Skip to main content

Full text of "Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science. : Temperature of Lake Wawasee"

See other formats


This  is  a  digital  copy  of  a  book  that  was  preserved  for  generations  on  library  shelves  before  it  was  carefully  scanned  by  Google  as  part  of  a  project 
to  make  the  world's  books  discoverable  online. 

It  has  survived  long  enough  for  the  copyright  to  expire  and  the  book  to  enter  the  public  domain.  A  public  domain  book  is  one  that  was  never  subject 
to  copyright  or  whose  legal  copyright  term  has  expired.  Whether  a  book  is  in  the  public  domain  may  vary  country  to  country.  Public  domain  books 
are  our  gateways  to  the  past,  representing  a  wealth  of  history,  culture  and  knowledge  that's  often  difficult  to  discover. 

Marks,  notations  and  other  marginalia  present  in  the  original  volume  will  appear  in  this  file  -  a  reminder  of  this  book's  long  journey  from  the 
publisher  to  a  library  and  finally  to  you. 

Usage  guidelines 

Google  is  proud  to  partner  with  libraries  to  digitize  public  domain  materials  and  make  them  widely  accessible.  Public  domain  books  belong  to  the 
public  and  we  are  merely  their  custodians.  Nevertheless,  this  work  is  expensive,  so  in  order  to  keep  providing  this  resource,  we  have  taken  steps  to 
prevent  abuse  by  commercial  parties,  including  placing  technical  restrictions  on  automated  querying. 

We  also  ask  that  you: 

+  Make  non-commercial  use  of  the  files  We  designed  Google  Book  Search  for  use  by  individuals,  and  we  request  that  you  use  these  files  for 
personal,  non-commercial  purposes. 

+  Refrain  from  automated  querying  Do  not  send  automated  queries  of  any  sort  to  Google's  system:  If  you  are  conducting  research  on  machine 
translation,  optical  character  recognition  or  other  areas  where  access  to  a  large  amount  of  text  is  helpful,  please  contact  us.  We  encourage  the 
use  of  public  domain  materials  for  these  purposes  and  may  be  able  to  help. 

+  Maintain  attribution  The  Google  "watermark"  you  see  on  each  file  is  essential  for  informing  people  about  this  project  and  helping  them  find 
additional  materials  through  Google  Book  Search.  Please  do  not  remove  it. 

+  Keep  it  legal  Whatever  your  use,  remember  that  you  are  responsible  for  ensuring  that  what  you  are  doing  is  legal.  Do  not  assume  that  just 
because  we  believe  a  book  is  in  the  public  domain  for  users  in  the  United  States,  that  the  work  is  also  in  the  public  domain  for  users  in  other 
countries.  Whether  a  book  is  still  in  copyright  varies  from  country  to  country,  and  we  can't  offer  guidance  on  whether  any  specific  use  of 
any  specific  book  is  allowed.  Please  do  not  assume  that  a  book's  appearance  in  Google  Book  Search  means  it  can  be  used  in  any  manner 
anywhere  in  the  world.  Copyright  infringement  liability  can  be  quite  severe. 

About  Google  Book  Search 

Google's  mission  is  to  organize  the  world's  information  and  to  make  it  universally  accessible  and  useful.  Google  Book  Search  helps  readers 
discover  the  world's  books  while  helping  authors  and  publishers  reach  new  audiences.  You  can  search  through  the  full  text  of  this  book  on  the  web 


at|http  :  //books  .  google  .  com/ 


B     1.061.285 


!• 


I 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF  THE 


Indiana  Academy  of  Science 

1917 


LEE  F.  BENNETT,  Editor 


INDIANAPOLIS: 

WM    It    IIHIlFOItD,  Cd.NTUACTOU  FOR  STATK  I'ni.NTINlJ  AND  UINniN«; 
1918 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


^/\Uu^^^J^A^.4f<A^^ 


CONTENTS. 


PAGE 

Constitution 5 

By-Laws 7 

Appropriation  for  1917-1918 9 

Public  Offenses — Hunting  Birds — Penalty 10 

Officers,  1917-1918 11 

Committees  Academy  of  Science,  1917 11 

Officers  of  the  Academy  of  Science'  (A  Table  of) 12 

Members 15 

Fellows 15 

Non-Resident  Members  and  Fellowa 20 

Active  Members 24 

Minutes  of  the  Spring  Meeting 39 

Minutes  of  the  Thirty-second  Annual  Meeting. 43 

Program  of  the  Thirty-second  Annual  Meeting 49 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


CONSTITUTION. 


ARTICLE  I.  % 

Section  1.  This  association  shall  be  called  the  Indiana  Academy  of 
Science. 

Sec.  2.  The  objects  of  this  Academy  shall  be  scientific  research  and 
the  diffusion  of  knowledge  concerning  the  various  departments  of  science ; 
to  promote  intercourse  between  men  engaged  in  scientific  work,  especially 
in  Indiana;  to  assist  by  investigation  and  discussion  in  developing  and 
making  known  the  material,  educational  and  other  resources  and  riches 
of-  the  State;  to  arrange  and  prepare  for  publication  such  reports  of  in- 
vestigation and  discussion  as  may  further  the  aims  and  objects  of  the 
Academy  as  set  forth  in  these  articles. 

Whereas,  The  State  has  undertaken  the  publication  of  such  proceed- 
ings, the  Academy  will,  upon  request  of  the  Governor,  or  one  of  the  sev- 
eral departments  of  the  State,  through  the  Governor,  act  through  its 
council  as  an  advisory  body  in  the  direction  and  execution  of  any  investi- 
gation within  its  province  as  stated.  The  necessary  expenses  incurred 
in  the  prosecution  of  such  investigation  are  to  be  borne  by  the  State;  no 
pecuniary  gain  is  to  come  to  the  Academy  for  its  advice  or  direction  of 
such  investigation. 

The  regular  proceedings  of  the  Academy  as  published  by  the  State 
shall  become  a  public  document. 

ARTICLE  II. 

Section  1.  Members  of  this  academy  shall  be  honorary  fellows, 
fellows,  non-resident  members  or  active  members. 

Sec.  2.  Any  person  engaged  in  any  department  of  scientific  work, 
or  in  any  original  research  in  any  department  of  science,  shall  be  eligible 
to  active  membership.  Active  members  may  be  annual  or  life  members. 
Annual  members  may  be  elected  at  any  meeting  of  the  Academy;  they 
shall  sign  the  constitution,  pay  an  admission  fee  of  two  dollars  and  there- 
after an  annual  fee  of  one  dollar.  Any  person  who  shall  at  one  time  con- 
tribute fifty  dollars  to  the  funds  of  this  Academy  may  be  elected  a  life 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


member  of  the  Academy,  free  of  assessment.  Non-resident  members  may 
be  elected  from  those  who  have  been  active  members  but  who  have  re- 
moved from  the  State.  In  any  case,  a  three-fourths  vote  of  the  members 
present  shall  elect  to  membership.  Application  for  membership  in  any  of 
the  foregoing  classes  shall  be  referred  to  a  committee  on  application  for 
membership,  who  shall  consider  such  application  and  report  to  the  Acad- 
emy before  the  election. 

Sec.  3.  The  members  who  are  actively  engaged  in  scientific  work, 
who  have  recognized  standing  as  scientific  men,  and  who  have  been  mem- 
bers of  the  Academy  at  least  one  year,  may  be  recommended  for  nomina- 
tion for  election  as  fellows  by  three  fellows  or  members  personally  ac- 
quainted with  their  work  and  character.  Of  members  so  nominated  a 
number  not  exceeding  five  in  one  year  may,  on  recommendation  of  the 
Executive  Committee,  be  elected  as  fellows.  At  the  meeting  at  which 
this  is  adopted,  the  members  of  the  Executive  Committee  for  1894  and 
fifteen  others  shall  be  elected  fellows,  and  those  now  honorary  members 
shall  bcome  honorary  fellows.  Honorary  fellows  may  be  elected  on  ac- 
count of  special  prominence  in  science,  on  the  written  recommendation  of 
two  members  of  the  Academy.  In  any  case  a  three-fourths  vote  of  the 
members  present  shall  elect. 

ARTICLE  III. 

Section  1.  The  officers  of  this  Academy  shall  be  chosen  by  ballot  at 
the  annual  meeting,  and  shall  hold  office  one  year.  They  shall  consist  of 
a  President,  Vice-President,  Secretary,  Assistant  Secretary,  Press  Secre- 
tary, Editor,  and  Treasurer,  who  shall  perform  the  duties  usually  per- 
taining to  their  respective  offices  and  in  addition,  with  the  ex-presidents 
of  the  Academy,,  shall  constitute  an  Executive  Committee.  The  Presi- 
dent shall,  at  each  annual  meeting,  appoint  two  members  to  be  a  com- 
mittee, which  shall  prepare  the  programs  and  have  charge  of  the  ar- 
rangements for  all  meetings  for  one  year. 

Sec.  2.  The  annual  meeting  of  the  Academy  shall  be  held  in  the  city 
of  Indianapolis  within  the  week  following  Christmas  of  each  year,  unless 
otherwise  ordered  by  the  Executive  Committee.  There  shall  also  be  a 
summer  meeting  at  such  time  and  place  as  may  be  decided  upon  by  the 
Executive  Committee.  Other  meetings  may  be  called  at  the  discretion  of 
the  Executive  Committee.    The  past  Presidents,  together  with  the  officers 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


and  Executive  Committee,  shall  constitute  the  council  of  the  Academy, 
and  represent  it  in  the  transaction  of  any  necessary  business  not  espe- 
cially provided  for  in  this  constitution,  in  the  interim  between  general 
meetings. 

Sec.  3.  This  constitution  may  be  altered  or  amended  at  any  annual 
meeting  by  a  three-fourths  majority  of  the  attending  members  of  at  least 
one  year's  standing.  No  question  of  amendment  shall  be  decided  on  the 
day  of  its  presentation. 


BY-LAWS. 


1.  On  motion,  any  special  department  of  science  shall  be  assigned  to 
a  curator,  whose  duty  it  shall  be,  with  the  assistance  of  the  other  mem- 
bers interested  in  the  same  department,  to  endeavor  to  advance  knowl- 
edge in  that  particular  department.  Each  curator  shall  report  at  such 
time  and  place  as  the  Academy  shall  direct.  These  reports  shall  include^ 
a  brief  summary  of  the  progress  of  the  department  during  the  year  pre- 
ceding the  presentation  of  the  report. 

2.  The  President  shall  deliver  a  public  address  on  the  morning  of 
one  of  the  days  of  the  meeting  at  the  expiration  of  his  term  of  office. 

3.  The  Press  Secretary  shall  attend  to  the  securing  of  proper  news- 
paper reports  of  the  meetings  and  assist  the  Secretary. 

4.  No  special  meeting  of  the  Academy  shall  be  held  without  a  notice 
of  the  same  having  been  sent  to  the  address  of  each  member  at  least 
fifteen  days  before  such  meeting. 

5.  No  bill  against  the  Academy  shall  be  paid  without  an  order 
signed  by  the  President  and  countersigned  by  the  Secretary. 

6.  Members  who  shall  allow  their  dues  to  remain  unpaid  for  two 
years,  having  been  annually  notified  of  their  arrearage  by  the  Treasurer, 
shall  have  their  names  stricken  from  the  roll. 

7.  Ten  members  shall  constitute  a  quorum  for  the  transaction  of 
business. 

8.  An  Editor  shall  be  elected  from  year  to  year.  His  duties  shall 
be  to  edit  the  annual  Proceedings.  No  allowance  shall  be  made  to  the 
editor  for  clerical  assistance  on  account  of  any  one  edition  of  the  Pro- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


8 

ceedings  in  excess  of  fifty  ($50)  dollars  except  by  special  action  of  the 
Executive  Committee.     (Amendment  passed  December  8,  1917.) 

AN  ACT   TO   PROVIDE   FOR  THE   PUBLICATION   OF   THE   RE- 
PORTS AND  PAPERS  OF  THE  INDIANA  ACADEMY 
OF  SCIENCE. 

(Approved  March  11,  1895.) 

Whereas,  The  Indiana  Academy  of  Science,  a  chartered  scientific 
association,  has  embodied  in  its  constitution  a  provision  that  it  will,  upon 
the  request  of  the  Governor,  or  of  the  several  departments  of  the  State 
government,  through  the  Governor,  and  through  its  council  as  an  ad- 
visory board,  assist  in  the  direction  and  execution  of  any  investigation 
within  its  province  without  pecuniary  gain  to  the  Academy,  provided 
only  that  the  necessary  expenses  of  such  investigation  are  borne  by  the 
State;  and. 

Whereas,  The  reports  of  the  meetings  of  said  Academy,  with  the 
several  papers  read  before  it,  have  very  great  educational,  industrial  and 
economic  value,  and  should  be  preserved  in  permanent  form;  and, 

Whereas,  The  Constitution  of  the  State  makes  it  the  duty  of  the 
General  Assembly  to  encourage  by  all  suitable  means  intellectual,  scien- 
tific and  agricultural  improvement;  therefore. 

Section  1.  Be  it  enacted  by  the  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Indiana,  That  hereafter  the  annual  reports  of  the  meetings  of  the  Indi- 
ana Academy  of  Science,  beginning  with  the  report  for  the  year  1894,  in- 
cluding all  papers  of  scientific  or  economic  value,  presented  at  such  meet- 
ings, after  they  shall  have  been  edited  and  prepared  for  publication  as 
hereinafter  provided,  shall  be  published  by  and  under  the  direction  of  the 
Commissioners  of  Public  Printing  and  Binding. 

Sec.  2.  Said  reports  shall  be  edited  and  prepared  for  publication 
without  expense  to  the  State,  by  a  corps  of  editors  to  be  selected  and 
appointed  by  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Science,  who  shall  not,  by  reason  of 
such  service,  have  any  claim  against  the  State  for  compensation.  The 
form,  style  of  binding,  paper,  typography  and  manner  and  extent  of  illus- 
tration of  such  reports  shall  be  determined  by  the  editors,  subject  to  the 
approval  of  the  Commissioners  of  Public  Printing  and  Stationery.  Not 
less  than  1,500  nor  more  than  3,000  copies  of  each  of  said  reports  shall  be 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


published,  the  size  of  the  edition  within  said  limits  to  be  determined  by 
the  concurrent  action  of  the  editors  and  the  Commissioners  of  Public 
Printing  and  Stationery:  Provided,  That  not  to  exceed  six  hundred  dol- 
lars ($600)  shall  be  expended  for  such  publication  in  any  one  year,  and 
not  to  extend  beyond  1896:  Provided,  That  no  sums  shall  be  deemed  to 
be  appropriated  for  the  year  1894. 

Sec.  3.  All  except  three  hundred  copies  of  each  volume  of  said  re- 
ports shall  be  placed  in  the  custody  of  the  State  Librarian,  who  shall 
furnish  one  copy  thereof  to  each  public  library  in  the  State,  one  copy  to 
each  university,  college  or  normal  school  in  the  State,  one  copy  to  each 
high  school  in  the  State  having  a  library,  which  shall  make  application 
therefor,  and  one  copy  to  such  other  institutions,  societies  or  persons  as 
may  be  designated  by  the  Academy  through  its  editors  or  its  council. 
The  remaining  three  hundred  copies  shall  be  turned  over  to  the  Academy 
to  be  disposed  of  as  it  may  determine.  In  order  to  provide  for  the  pres- 
ervation of  the  same  it  shall  be  the  duty  of  the  Custodian  of  the  State 
House  to  provide  and  place  at  the  disposal  of  the  Academy  one  of  the 
unoccupied  rooms  of  the  State  House,  to  be  design^ated  as  the  office  of  the 
Academy  of  Science,  wherein  said  copies  of  said  reports  belonging  to 
the  Academy,  together  with  the  original  manuscripts,  drawings,  etc., 
thereof  can  be  safely  kept,  and  he  shall  also  equip  the  same  with  the  nec- 
essary shelving  and  furniture. 

Sec.  4.  An  emergency  is  hereby  declared  to  exist  for  the  immediate 
taking  effect  of  this  act,  and  it  shall  therefore  take  effect  and  be  in  force 
from  and  after  its  passage. 

APPROPRIATION   FOR  1917-1918. 

The  appropriation  for  the  publication  of  the  proceedings  of  the 
Academy  during  the  years  1916  and  1917  was  increased  by  the  Legisla- 
ture in  the  General  Appropriation  bill,  approved  March  8,  1915.  The  Act 
making  appropriation  for  the  years  1917-1918  and  1918-1919  was  ap- 
proved March  6,  1917.  That  portion  of  the  law  fixing  the  amount  of  the 
appropriation  for  the  Academy  is  herewith  given  in  full. 

For  the  Academy  of  Science :  For  the  printing  of  the  proceedings  of 
the  Indiana  Academy  of  Science  twelve  hundred  dollars:  Provided,  That 
any  unexpended  balance  in  1916  shall  be  available  for  1917  and  that  any 
unexpended  balance  in  1917  shall  be  available  in  1918. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


10 

PUBLIC  OFFENSES— HUNTING  WILD  BIRDS— PENALTY. 

(Approved  March  15,  1913.) 

Section  1.  Be  it  enacted  by  the  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Indiana,  That  section  six  (6)  of  the  above  entitled  act  be  amended  to 
read  as  follows:  Section  6.  That  section  six  hundred  two  (602)  of  the 
above  entitled  act  be  amended  to  read  as  follows:  Section  602.  It  shall 
be  unlawful  for  any  person  to  kill,  trap  or  possess  any  wild  bird,  or  to 
purchase  or  offer  the  same  for  sale,  or  to  destroy  the  nest  or  eggs  of  any 
wild  bird,  except  as  otherwise  provided  in  this  section.  But  this  section 
shall  not  apply  to  the  following  named  game  birds :  The  Anatidae,  com- 
monly called  swans,  geese,  brant,  river  and  sea  duck;  the  Rallidae,  com- 
monly known  as  rails,  coots,  mud-hens  and  gallinules;  the  Limicolae, 
commonly  known  as  shore  birds,  plovers,  surf  birds,  snipe,  woodcock, 
sandpipers,  tattlers  and  curlews;  the  Gallinae,  commonly  called  wild 
turkeys,  grouse,  prairie  chickens,  quails,  and  pheasants;  nor  to  English 
or  European  house  sparrows,  blackbirds,  crows,  hawks  or  other  birds  of 
prey.  Nor  shall  this  section  apply  to  any  person  taking  birds  or  their 
nests  or  eggs  for  scientific  purposes  under  permit  as  provided  in  the  next 
section.  Any  person  violating  the  provisions  of  this  section  shall,  on  con- 
viction, be  fined  not  less  than  ten  dollars  ($10.00)  nor  more  than  fifty 
dollars  ($50.00). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


11 


INDIANA  ACADEMY  OF  SCIENCE. 

Officers,  1918. 

President, 

E.  B.  Williamson. 

Vice-President, 

Charles  Stoltz. 

Secretary, 

Howard  E.  Enders. 

Assistant  Secretary, 

Philip  A,  Tetrault. 

Press  Secretary, 

Frank  B.  Wade. 

Treasurer, 

William  M.  Blanchard. 

Editor, 

Lee  F.  Bennett. 

Executive  Committee: 

Arthur,  J.  C,  Dryer,  Chas.  R.,  Mendenhall,  T.  C, 

Bennett,  L.  F.,  Eigenmann,  C.  H.,  Naylor,  Joseph  P., 

Bigney,  a.  J.,  Enders,  Howard  E,,  Noyes,  W.  A., 

Blanchard,  W.  M.,  Evans,  P.  N.,  Stoltz,  Charles, 

Blatchley,  W.  S.,  Foley,  A.  L.,  Tetrault,  P,  A., 

Branner,  J.  C,  Hay,  O.  P.,  Wade,  F.  B., 

Burrage,  Severance,  Hessler,  Robert,  Waldo,  C.  A., 

Butler,  Amos  W.,  Jordan,  D.  S.,  Wiley,  H.  W., 

Cogshall,  W.  a.,  McBeth,  W.  A.,  Williamson,  E.  B., 

Coulter,  John  M.,  Mees,  Carl  L.,  Wright,  John  S. 

Coulter,  Stanley,  Moenkhaus,  W.  J., 

Culbertson,  Glenn,  Mottier,  David  M., 

Curators: 

Botany J.  C.  Arthur. 

Entomology W.  S.  Blatchley. 

Herpetology   1 

Mammalogy     L A.  W.  Butler. 

Ornithology  J 

Ichthyology C.  H.  Eigenmann. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


12 


Committees  Academy  of  Science,  1918. 


Program. 
C.  C.  Deam,  Bluffton 
Frank  B.  Wade,  Shortridge  High 

School,  Indianapolis 
John  S.  Wright,  Indianapolis 

Norninations, 
Stanley  Coulter,  Lafayette 
W.  J.  Moenkhaus,  Bloomington 
J.  P.  Naylor,  Greencastle 

State  Library, 

W.  S.  Blatchley,  i^58  Park  Av- 
enue, Indianapolis 

A.  L.  Foley,  Bloomington 

Amos  W.  Butler,  State  House,  In- 
dianapolis 

Biological  Survey, 

Herbert  S.  Jackson,  Agr.  Experi- 
ment Station,  West  Lafayette 

Richard  M,  Holman,  Crawfords- 
ville 

M.  S.  Markle,  Richmond 

Will  Scott,  Indiana  University, 
Bloomington 

Distribution:  of  Proceedings, 
Howard  E.  Enders,  West  Lafay- 
ette 
Wm.  M.  Blanchard,  Greencastle 
U.   O.   Cox,    State  Normal,  Terre 

Haute 
George  Osner,  West  Lafayette 


Membership, 
¥,  M.  Andrews,  Bloomington 
M.  L.  Fisher,  West  Lafayette 
Mason  L.  Weems,  Valparaiso 

Auditing, 
Glenn  Culbertson,  Hanover 
RoLLo  Ramsey,  Bloomington 

Relation  of  the  Academy  to  the 
State. 

R.  W.  McBride,  1239  State  Life 
Building,  Indianapolis 

Glenn  Culbertson,  Hanover 

H.  E.  Barnard,  State  House,  Indi- 
anapolis 

John  S.  Wright,  3718  Penn.  St., 
Indianapolis 

W.  W.  Woollen,  1628  Penn.  St., 
Indianapolis 

Publication  of  Proceedings, 

Lee  F.  Bennett,  825  Laporte  Av- 
enue, Valparaiso 

Robert  Hessler,  Logansport. 

George  N.  Hoffer,  West  Lafayette 

R.  R.  Hyde,  Terre  Haute 

James  Brown,  5372  E.  Washington 
St.,  Indianapolis 

Advisory  Council, 
John  S.  Wright 
R.  W.  McBride 
Glenn  Culbertson 
Stanley  Coulter 
Wilbur  Cogshall 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


13 


X 
g 


c    S    5    5   ♦ 

•^  '5  'S  '-3  '_3  '^  '^  '^  2    §    S    S    a^    2?    S^    2?    ? 

PLH*      PLh'      PLh'      PLh'      PJ     OI      <  <d  f^      f^*      f^      ^      ^      ^      ^      ^      ^ 

6066666  6  ^^^d^^^>^>^^ 


0        Q) 

PQ   PQ 

s  s 


o 

o 


Q 

s 

l-H 

a 

O 

o 
o 


CO 


a  c  G  c  c 
00000 

.*3  .**  .»3  .»3  .»a 

C  fi  C  C3  S  ^  Z 

/S^  ^  i^  i^  i^  2  2 

PQ  PQ  pq  pq  pq  ^  ^ 

^  ^  ^  ^  ^<< 

6  6  6  6  o*  "^  '^'^ 

o  o  o  c3  o  o  o 


«    o    v    a>   3 
Sd    Sd   S)   5)  •€ 


N       N       N 


PQ    PQ    PQ    PQ    CC    CO 
^    ^    ^    ^    <    < 

^  <  <  ^  w  w 


t» 


» 


o 

PQ 

c 
o 

-s 


3  2  P5 


OP 

V 

0) 

/*^ 

o 

0 

V 

CJ 

*3 

•tJ 

^ 

'*i 

'-»j 

■»^ 

•t^ 

•*j 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

3 

PQ 

CQ 

PQ 

PQ 

PQ 

« 

PQ 

PQ 

^^^^^^g:     ^ 


o  .2^  .2f  3  .2^  .^  .2f  .2^  .Sf  .2^  .^ 
-a  'C  *C  *C  *C  *C  'C  *C  *C  'C  *c 

'^  cc  CO  o}  od  aj  aj  OQ  oj  od  ai 


s  a  s  s  I 

<  <  ^  ^  ^ 


o 
B 


M    JS    M    M    ^ 


Ja    M    JS    S    S 


r^     O     O     O     O     O     O     b     O     6 


H 
Z 

a 

CO 


u* 
O 

•-9 

03 

Q 


CD 

a 

a 
o 


3  0>      O) 

•^   o  "i 


o 

•-5 


PQ 


H   O 


^-      ^   < 


3      2^ 

o  o  ^ 

a  ^ 

^  H  d 


c 
3 

a  .2 

g  g 

3  « 

a  ^* 

d  d 


>.  PQ 


o 


00 


2^    »o    «o    t^    00    o 

Oi     O)     C)     O)     O^     w3 
00     00     00     00     00     00 


u 

> 


i  i  ^ 

00    o    ^ 


QO 


CO     4"     »0     CO     t^     00 

00     00     00     00     00     00 


^     C^     CO 
Cm     C»     oS 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


14 


CO 

< 


^   ^   ^   Xi   Ji 


0) 


<J  <  <  <  ^, 


3  ?  §  § 

09  c3  09  o3 

,a  ^  ^  ^ 

^  ^  ^  M 

G  G  a  G 

O  V  V  o 

o  o  o  o 

s  s  s  s 


^    ^    *s    ^    < 


--     ^     ^ 

I  s  § 


bC   CO 
O    ^ 


^^^^^^^^^^ 


PQ  PQ   PQ 


s  s  s  s 


^ 


J 

C 

o 
O 

O 

E 
o 


H 


44 

09 


o 

<  s 


o    o 

Xi    XI 
<    < 


<    <    < 

odd 


o 

TJ 


o  9  0^    .XS  .Z^  -^^ 

§  I  a  a  5  3  '6 

Ph   S  PQ  S   ^  >  ^. 

w  w  '^'  "^  ^*  ^*  ^  S 

^  ^-^  <j  <i  -<  w  w  d 


09 


03 

^    PQ 

o 


3      3 

PQ   PQ 

C     G 


S  6 

o  o 

OQ  00 

G  G 


93 
O 

^  ^  03  pa  CQ  pa  03  CQ 
S    S    b'    |ii   p^    Cih'    |x<    ^ 


^^    §33 


PlH* 


o  O)  a> 

^3  TS  -O 

;       ;              ;  C  G  C 

G>     a>     «     o     o  ^i  ^i  ^A 

.1  .1  .1  .1    &  ^  ^  ^ 

iS  S  3  3  S  g  J-  g 

^  i-s  ^*  •-»  i-j  g  g  ^ 


S3 


II 


o 


G 


Q  O  <   Plh'  d 


:  ^3 

.    o 
k.    PQ 

i§ 

^    o 


0(3 

o 


O      G 


PQ 


i 


o   ^ 


0)    j3 


£  ►-s'  *^  PQ 
%  <  ^  W 


CI     CO     "^J^     lO     O     t^     00 
Oi     Oi     Oi     Oi     Oi     Oi     0> 


w^     C^     O     O     O     O     O     Oi     O     Od 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


15 

MEMBERS.* 


FELLOWS. 

Anderson,  H.  W.,  Urbana,  111 tl912 

Department  of  Botany,  University  of  Illinois. 

Botany. 
Andrews,  F.  M.,  901  E.  10th  Street,  Bloomington 1911 

Associate  Professor  of  Botany,  Indiana  University. 

Plant  Physiology,  Botany. 
Arthur,  Joseph  C,  915  Columbia  St.,  Lafayette 1893 

Professor   (Retired)   of  Vegetable  Physiology  and  Pathology, 
Purdue  University. 

Botany. 
Badertscher,  J.  A.,  Bloomington 1917 

Professor  of  Anatomy,  Indiana  University. 

Anatomy. 
Barnard,  H.  E.,  Room  20  State  House,  Indianapolis 1910 

Chemist  to  Indiana  State  Board  of  Health,  State  Food  Admin- 
istrator. 

Chemistry,  Sanitary  Science,  Pure  Foods. 
Beede,  Joshua  W.,  404  W.  38th  St.,  Austin,  Texas 1906 

Bureau  of  Economic  Geology  and  Technology,  Univ.  Texas. 

Geology. 
Behrens,  Charles  A.,  West  Lafayette,  Ind 1917 

Professor  of  Bacteriology,  Purdue  University. 

Bacteriology. 
Bennett,  Lee  F.,  825  Laporte  Ave.,  Valparaiso 1916 

Professor  of  Geology  and  Zoologry,  Valparaiso  University. 

Geology,  Zoolog^r. 

•  Every  efTort  has  been  made  to  obtain  the  correct  address  and  occupation  of  each 
member,  and  to  learn  in  what  line  of  science  he  is  interested.  The  first  line  contains 
the  name  and  address ;  the  second  line  the  occupation ;  the  third  line  the  branch  of 
science  in  which  he  is  interested.  The  omission  of  an  address  indicates  that  mail  ad- 
dressed to  the  last  printed  address  was  returned  as  uncalled  for.  Information  as  to  the 
present  address  of  members  so  indicated  is  requested  by  the  secretary.  The  custom  of 
dividing  the  list  of  members  has  been  followed. 

t  Date  of  election. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


16 

Benton,  George  W.,  100  Washington  Square,  New  York,  N.  Y 1896 

Editor  in  Chief,  American  Book  Company. 
Bigney,  Andrew  J.,  Moores  Hill,  Ind 1897 

Professor  of  Biology  and  Geology,  Moores  Hill  College. 

Biology,  Geology. 
Bitting,  Mrs.  Katherine  Golden,  Washington,  D.  C 1895 

Miscroscopic  Expert,  Pure  Food,  National  Canners  Laboratory. 

Botany. 
Blanchard,  William  M.,  1008  S.  College  Ave.,  Greencastle,  Ind 1914 

Professor  of  Chemistry,  DePauw  University,  Greencastle,  Ind. 

Organic  Chemistry. 
Blatchley,  W.  S.,  1558  Park  Ave.,  Indianapolis 1893 

Naturalist. 

Botany,  Entomology,  and  Geology. 
Breeze,  Fred  J.,  Hunter  Avenue,  Bloomington 1910 

Graduate  School,  Indiana  University. 

Geography. 
Bruner,  Henry  Lane,  324  S.  Ritter  Ave.,  Indianapolis 1899 

Professor  of  Biology,  Butler  College. 

Comparative  Anatomy,  Zoology. 
Bryan,  William  Lowe,  Bloomington 1914 

President  Indiana  University. 

Psychology. 
Butler,  Amos  W.,  52  Downey  Ave.,  Irvington 1893 

Secretary,  Indiana  Board  of  State  Charities. 

Vertebrate  Zoology,  Anthropology,  Sociology. 
Cogshall,  Wilbur  A.,  423  S.  Fess  Ave.,  Bloomington 1906 

Associate  Professor  of  Astronomy,  Indiana  University. 

Astronomy. 
Coulter,  Stanley,  213  S.  Ninth  St.,  Lafayette 1893 

Dean  School  of  Science,  Purdue  University. 

Botany,  Forestry. 
Cox,  Ulysses  O.,  P.  O.  Box  81,  Terre  Haute 1908 

Head  Department  Zoology  and  Botany,  Indiana  State  Normal. 

Botany,  Zoology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


17 

Culbertson,  Glenn,  Hanover 1899 

Chair  Geolog^r,  Physics  and  Astronomy,  Hanover  College. 

Geology. 
Cumings,  Edgar  Roscoe,  327  E.  Second  St.,  Bloomington 1906 

Professor  of  Geolog^r,  Indiana  University. 

Geology,  Paleontology. 
Deam,  Charles  C,  Bluffton 1910 

Druggist,  Botanist,  State  Forester. 

Botany. 

Dryer,  Charles  R.,  Oak  Knoll,  Fort  Wayne,  or  Terre  Haute 1897 

Geography. 

Dutcher,  J.  B.,  1212  Atwater  St.,  Bloomington 1914 

Associate  Professor  of  Physics,  Indiana  University. 
Physics. 

Eigenmann,  Carl  H.,  630  Atwater  St.,  Bloomington 1893 

Professor  of  Zoology,  Dean  of  Graduate  School,  Indiana  Uni- 
versity. 
Embryology,  Degeneration,  Heredity,  Evolutipn  and  Distribu- 
tion of  American  Fish. 

Enders,  Howard  Edwin,  107  Fowler  Ave.,  Lafayette 1912 

Professor  of  Zoolog^r,  Purdue  University. 

Zoology. 
Evans,  Percy  Norton,  302  Waldron  Street,  West  Lafayette 1901 

Director  of  Chemical  Laboratory,  Purdue  University. 

Chemistry. 
Foley,  Arthur  L.,  Bloomington 1897 

Head  of  Department  of  Physics,  Indiana  University. 

Physics. 
Golden,  M.  J.,  West  Lafayette 1899 

Formerly   Director   of   Laboratories   of   Practical   Mechanics, 
Purdue  University. 

Mechanics. 
Hathaway,  Arthur  S.,  2206  N.  Tenth  St.,  Terre  Haute 1895 

Professor  of  Mathematics,  Rose  Polytechnic  Institute. 

Mathematics,  Physics. 

2—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


18 

Hessler,  Robert,  Logansport 1899 

Physician. 

Biology. 
Hoffer,  George  N.,  Littleton  St.,  West  Lafayette 1913 

Federal  Agent,  Purdue  University  Experiment  Station. 
Hufford,  Mason  E.,  Bloomington 1916 

Physics. 
Hurty,  J.  N.,  Indianapolis 1910 

Secretary,  Indiana  State  Board  of  Health. 

Sanitary  Science,  Vital  Statistics,  Eugenics. 
Hyde,  Roscoe  Raymond,  636  Chestnut  Street,  Terre  Haute 1909 

Assistant   Professor  Physiolog^r  and   Zoology,   Indiana   State 
Normal. 

Zoology,  Physiolog^r,  Bacteriology. 
Kenyon,  Alfred  Monroe,  315  University  St.,  West  Lafayette 1914 

Professor  of  Mathematics,  Purdue  University. 

Mathematics. 
Kern,  Frank  D.,  State  College  Pa 1912 

Professor  of  Botany,  Pennsylvania  State  College. 

Botany. 
Koch,  Edward  W.,  Eli  Lilly  Co.,  Indianapolis 1917 

Department  of  Research,  Eli  Lilly  Co. 

Physiology. 
Logan,  Wm,  N.,  320  S.  Fess  Ave.,  Bloomington 1917 

Professor  of  Economic  Geology,  Indiana  University. 

Geology. 
McBeth,  William  A.,  1905  N.  Eighth  St.,  Terre  Haute 1904 

Assistant  Professor  of  Geography,  Indiana  Normal  School. 

(Geography,  Geology,  Scientific  Agriculture. 
McBride,  Robert  W.,  1239  State  Life  Building,  Indianapolis 1916 

Lawyer. 
Middleton,  A.  R.,  629  University  St.,  West  Lafayette 1908 

Professor  of  Chemistry,  Purdue  University. 

Chemistry. 
Moenkhaus,  William  J.,  501  Fess  Ave.,  Bloomington 1901 

Professor  of  Physiology,  Indiana  University. 

Physiology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


19 

Morrison,  Edwin,  80  S.  W.  Seventh  St.,  Richmond 1915 

Professor  of  Physics,  Earlham  College. 

Physics  and  Chemistry. 
Mottier,  David  M.,  215  Forest  Place,  Bloomington 1893 

Professor  of  Botany,  Indiana  University. 

Morphology,  Cytology. 
Naylor,  J.  P.,  Greencastle 1903 

Professor  of  Physics,  DePauw  University. 

Physics,  Mathematics. 
Payne,  F.,  620  S.  Fess  Ave.,  Bloomington 1916 

Associate  Professor  of  Zoology,  Indiana  University. 

Cytology  and  Embryology. 
Pohlman,  Augustus  G.,  16  Yale  Ave.,  University  City,  St.  Louis,  Mo.  1911 

Professor  of  Anatomy. 

Embryology,  Comparative  Anatomy. 
Ramsey,  Rolla  R.,  615  E.  Third  St.,  Bloomington 1906 

Associate  Professor  of  Physics,  Indiana  University. 

Physics. 
Ransom,  James  H.,  323  University  St.,  West  Lafayette 1902 

Professor  of  General  Chemistry,  Purdue  University. 

General  Chemistry,  Organic  Chemistry,  Teaching. 
Rettger,  Louis  J.,  31  Gilbert  Ave.,  Terre  Haute 1896 

Professor  of  Physiology,  Indiana  State  Normal. 

Animal  Physiology. 
Rothrock,  David  A.,  Bloomington 1906 

Professor  of  Mathematics,  Indiana  University. 

Mathematics. 
Schockel,  Barnard,  Terre  Haute 1917 

Professor  of  Physical  Geography,  State  Normal  School. 
Scott,  Will,  731  Atwater  St.,  Bloomington 1911 

Assistant  Professor  of  Zoology,  Indiana  University. 

Zoology,  Lake  Problems. 
Shannon,  Charles  W.,  518  Lahoma  Ave.,  Norman,  Okla 1912 

With  Oklahoma  State  Geological  Survey. 

Soil  Survey,  Botany. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


20 

Smith,  Albert,  University  St.,  West  Lafayette. 1908 

Professor  of  Structural  Engineering. 

Physics,  Mechanics. 
Smith,  Charles  Marquis,  152  Sheetz  St.,  West  Lafayette 1912 

Professor  of  Physics,  Purdue  University. 

Physics* 
Stone,  Winthrop  E.,  Lafayette 1893 

President  of  Purdue  University. 

Chemistry. 
Van  Hook,  James  M.,  939  N.  College  Ave.,  Bloomington 1911 

Assistant  Professor  of  Botany,  Indiana  University. 

Botany. 
Wade,  Frank  Bertram,  1039  W.  Twenty-seventh  St.,  Indianapolis. .  1914 

Head  of  Chemistry  Department,  Shortridge  High  School. 

Chemistry,  Physics,  Geology,  and  Mineralog^r. 
Waterman,  Luther  D.,  226  Pratt  St.,  Indianapolis 1916 

Physician. 
Williamson,  E.  B.,  Bluffton 1914 

Cashier,  The  Wells  County  Bank. 

Dragonflies. 
Woollen,  William  Watson,  Indianapolis 1908 

Lawyer. 

Birds  and  Nature  Study. 
Wright,  John  S.,  care  Eli  Lilly  Co.,  Indianapolis 1894 

Manager  of  Advertising  Department,  Eli  Lilly  Co. 

Botany. 


NON-RESIDENT  MEMBERS  AND  FELLOWS, 

Abbott,  G.  A.,  Grand  Forks,  N.  Dak.,  Fellow 1908 

Professor  of  Chemistry,  University  of  North  Dakota. 

Chemistry. 
Aley,  Robert  J.,  Orono,  Me.,  Fellow 1908 

President  of  University  of  Maine. 

Mathematics  and  General  Science. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


21 

Branner,  John  Casper,  Stanford  University,  Calif. 

President  Emeritus  of  Stanford  University. 

Geology. 
Brannon,  Melvin  A.,  President  University  of  Idaho,  Moscow,  Idaho. 

Professor  of  Botany. 

Plant  Breeding. 
Burrage,  Severance,  Waco,  Texas 1898 

United  States  Public  Health  Work. 
Campbell,  D.  H.,  Stanford  University,  Calif. 

Professor  of  Botany,  Stanford  University. 

Botany. 
Clark,  Howard  Walton,  U.  S.  Biological  Station,  Fairport,  Iowa. 

Scientific  Assistant  U.  S.  Bureau  of  Fisheries. 

Botany,  Zoology. 
Cook,  Mel  T.,  New  Brunswick,  N.  J.,  Fellow 1902 

Plant  Pathologist,  New  Jersey  Experiment  Station. 

Botany,  Plant  Pathology,  Entomology. 
Coulter,  John  M.,  University  of  Chicago,  Chicago,  111.,  Fellow 1893 

Head  Department  of  Botany,  .Chicago  University. 

Botany. 
Davis,  B.  M.,  Oxford,  Ohio. 

Professor  of  Agricultural  Education. 

Miami  University. 
DufF,  A.  Wilmer,  43  Harvard  St.,  Worcester,  Mass. 

Professor  of  Physics,  Worcester  Polytechnic  Institute. 

Physics. 
Evermann,  Barton  Warren,  Director  Museum. 

California  Academy  of  Science,  Golden  Gate  Park,  San  Fran- 
cisco, Cal. 

Zoology. 
Fiske,  W.  A.,  Los  Angeles,  Cal.,  Occidental  College. 
Gilbert,  Charles  H.,  Stanford  University,  California. 

Professor  of  Zoology,  Stanford  University. 

Ichthyology. 
Goss,  William  Freeman  M.,  61  Broadway,  N.  Y.,  Fellow 1893 

President  The  Railway  Car  Manufacturers  Association. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


22 

Greene,  Charles  Wilson,  814  Virginia  Ave.,  Columbia,  Mo. 

Professor   of    Physiology   and    Pharmacology,    University    of 
Missouri. 

Physiology,  Zoology. 
Hargitt,  Chas.  W.,  909  Walnut  Ave.,  Syracuse,  N.  Y. 

Professor  of  Zoolog^r  and  Director  of  the  Laboratories  Syracuse 
University. 

Hygiene,  Embryology,  Eugenics,  Animal  Behavior. 
Hay,  Oliver  Perry,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Research  Associate,  Carnegie  Institute  of  Washington. 

Vertebrate   Paleontology^,   especially   that   of   the   Pleistocene 
Epoch. 
Huston,  H.  A.,  New  York  City,  Fellow 1893 

Secretary,  German  Kali  Works. 
Jenkins,  Oliver  P.,  Stanford  University,  California. 

Professor  of  Physiolog^r,  Stanford  University. 

Physiology,  Histology. 
Jordan,  David  Starr,  Stanford  University,  California. 

Chancellor  Emeritus  of  Stanford  University. 

Fish,  Eugenics,  Botany,  Evolution. 
Kingsley,  J.  S.,  University  of  Illinois,  Urbana,  111. 

Professor  of  Zoology. 

Zoology. 
KleinSmid  von,  R.  B.,  President  Univ.  of  Arizona,  Tucson,  Ariz. 
Knipp,  Charles  T.,  915  W.  Nevada  St.,  Urbana,  Illinois. 

Professor  of  Experimental  Physics,  University  of  Illinois. 

Physics,  Discharge  of  Electricity  through  Gases. 
Marsters,  V.  F.,  Kansas  City,  Missouri,  Care  of  C.  N.  Gould,  Fellow  1893 

Geologist. 
McDougal,  Daniel  Trembly,  Tucson,  Arizona. 

Director,  Department  of  Botanical  Research,  Carnegie  Insti- 
tute, Washington,  D.  C. 

Botany. 
McMullen,  Lynn  Banks,  State  Normal  School,  Valley  City,  N.  D. 

Head  Science  Department  and  Vice-Pres.  State  Normal  School. 

Physics,  Chemistry. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


23 

Mendenhall,  Thomas  Corwin,  Ravenna,  Ohio. 

Retired. 

Physics,  "Engineering,"  Mathematics,  Astronomy. 
Miller,  John  Anthony,  Swarthmore,  Pa.,  Fellow 1904 

Professor  of  Mathematics  and  Astronomy,  Swarthmore  College. 

Astronomy,  Mathematics. 
Moore,  George  T.,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Director  Missouri  Botanical  Garden. 

Botany. 
Noyes,  William  Albert,  Urbana,  111.,  Fellow 1893 

Director  of  Chemical  Laboratory,  University  of  Illinois. 

Chemistry. 
Reagan,  A.  B. 

Superintendent  Deer  Creek  Indian  School,  Ibopah,  Utah. 

Greology,  PaleonfAlogy,  Ethnology. 
Smith,  Alexander,  care  Columbia  University,  New  York,  N.  Y., 

Fellow 1803 

Head  of  Department  of  Chemistry,  Columbia  University. 

Chemistry. 
Springer,  Alfred,  312  East  2d  St.,  Cincinnati,  Ohio. 

Chemist. 

Chemistry. 
Swain,  Joseph,  Swarthmore,  Pa.,  Fellow 1898 

President  of  Swarthmore  College. 

Science  of  Administration. 
Waldo,  Clarence  A.,  401  West  18th  St.,  New  York  City 1893 

Mathematics,  Mechanics,  Geology  and  Mineralogy. 
Wiley,  Harvey  W.,  Cosmos  Club,  Washington,  D.  C,  Fellow 1895 

Professor  of  Agricultural  Chemistry,  George  Washington  Uni- 
versity. 

Biologlical  and  Agricultural  Chemistry. 
Zeleny,  Chas.,  1003  W.  Illinois  St.,  Urbana,  111. 

Professor  of  Experimental  Zoology. 

Zoology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


24 


ACTIVE  MEMBERS. 


Aldrich,  John  Merton,  316  S.  Grant  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Federal  Entomological  Station. 

Zoology,  Entomology. 
Allen,  William  Ray,  212  S.  Washington  St.,  Bloomington. 

Zoology,  Indiana  University; 
Allison,  Evelyn,  435  Wood  St.,  Lafayette. 

Care  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 

Botany. 
Anderson,  Flora  Charlotte,  327  South  Henderson  St.,  Bloomington. 

Botany,  Indiana  University. 
Atkinson,  F.  C,  2534  Broadway,  Indianapolis. 

Chemistry,  American  Hominy  Company. 
Baker,  William  Franklin,  Indianapolis,  care  Eli  Lilly  Co. 

Medicine. 
Balcom,  H.  C,  1023  Park  Ave.,  Indianapolis. 

Botany. 
Bamhill,  Dr.  John  F.,  Indianapolis. 

Professor  of  Surgery,  Indiana  University  School  of  Medicine. 
Barr,  Harry  L.,  Veedersburg. 

Botany  and  Forestry.  ^ 
Bates,  W.  H.,  403  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Associate  Professor  of  Mathematics,  Purdue  University. 

Mathematics. 
Beals,  Colonzo  C,  Russiaville. 

Botany. 
Berteling,  John  B.,  215  S.  Taylor  St.,  South  Bend. 

Medicine. 
Binford,  Raymond,  Richmond. 

Professor  of  Zoology,  Earlham  College. 

Zoology. 
Bishop,  Harry  Eldridge,  1706  College  Ave.,  Indianapolis. 

Food  Chemist,  Indiana  State  Board  of  Health. 
Black,  Homer  F.,  Valparaiso. 

Professor  of  Mathematics,  Valparaiso  University. 

Mathematics. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


25 


Bliss,  G.  S.,  Fort  Wayne. 

Medicine,  State  School  for  Feeble  Minded. 
Blose,  Joseph,  Spiceland. 

Physics. 
Bond,  Charles  S.,  112  N.  Tenth  St.,  Richmond. 

Physician. 

Biology,  Bacteriolog^y,   Physical   Diagnosis   and   Photomicrog- 
raphy. 

Bond,  Dr.  George  S.,  Indianapolis. 

Professor  of  Medicine,  Indiana  University  School  of  Medicine. 
Bourke,  A.  Adolphus,  2304  Liberty  Ave.,  Terre  Haute. 

Instructor,  Physics,  Zoology,  and  Geography. 

Botany,  Physics. 
Bowers,  Paul  E.,  213  W.  9th  St.,  Michigan  City. 

Medicine. 
Breckinridge,  James  M.,  Crawfordsville. 

Chemistry. 
Brossman,  Charles,  1616  Merchants  Bank  Bldg.,  Indianapolis. 

Consulting  Engineer. 

Water  Supply,  Sewage  Disposal,  Sanitary  Engineering. 
Brown,  James,  5372  E.  Washington  St.,  Indianapolis. 

Professor  of  Chemistry,  Butler  College. 

Chemistry. 
Bruce,  Edwin  M.,  2401  North  Ninth  St.,  Terre  Haute. 

Professor  of  Chemistry,  Indiana  State  Normal. 

Chemistry. 
Bushey,  Alfred  L.,  210  Waldron  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Botany,  Agriculture,  Purdue  University. 
Butler,  Eugene,  337  Pearl  St.,  Richmond. 

Physics  and  Mathematics. 
Bybee,  Halbert  P.,  University  Station,  Austin,  Texas. 

Geology,  University  of  Texas. 
Canis,  Edward  N.,  R.  F.  D.  No.  17,  Clermont. 

Officeman  with  William  B.  Burford. 

Botany,  Psychology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


26 

CaparOy  Jose  Angel,  Notre  Dame. 

Professor  of  Physics  and  Mathematics,  Notre  Dame  University. 

Physics. 
Carr,  Ralph  Howard,  27  North  Salisbury  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Professor  of  Agricultural  Chemistry,  Purdue. 
Chandler,  Elias  J.,  Bicknell. 

Farmer. 

Ornithology  and  Mammals. 
Chapman,  Edgar  K.,  506  S.  Grant  St.,  Crawfordsville. 

Professor  of  Physics,  Wabash  College. 
Clark,  Elbert  Howard,  Hiram,  Ohio. 

Mathematics. 
Clark,  Jediah  H.,  126  East  Fourth  St.,  Connersville. 

Physician. 

Medicine. 
Clarke,  Elton  Russell,  1433  Lexington  Ave.,  Indianapolis. 

Zoology. 
Cloud,  J.  H.,  608  E.  Main  Street,  Valparaiso,  Ind. 

Professor  of  Physics,  Valparaiso  University. 

Physics. 
Collins,  Anna  Mary,  Irvington,  Indianapolis. 

Student  of  Zoology,  Butler  College. 
Collins,  Jacob  Roland,  711  Vine  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Instructor  in  Physics,  Purdue  University. 
Conner,  S.  D.,  204  S.  Ninth  St.,  Lafayette. 

Chemistry,  Experiment  Station. 
Coryell,  Noble  H.,  Bloomington. 

Chemistry. 
Cotton,  Wm.  J.,  5363  University  Ave.,  Indianapolis. 

Physics  and  Chemistry. 
Crampton,  Charles,  515  Olive  St.,  Texarkana,  Texas. 

Psychology. 
Cromwell,  Hobart,  Salem,  Ind. 

Zoology. 
Crowell,  Melvin  E.,  Cambom,  B.  C. 

Chemistry  and  Physics. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


27 


CuUison,  Aline,  East  Chicago,  Indiana,  Box  404. 

Instructor,  Botany,  in  East  Chicago  High  School. 
Damron,  Oliver  E.,  Valparaiso. 

Mathematics,  Valparaiso  University. 
Daniels,  Lorenzo  E.,  Rolling  Prairie. 

Retired  Farmer. 

Conchology. 
Davis,  Melvin  K.,  215  W.  12th  St.,  Anderson. 

Instructor,  Anderson  High  School. 

Physiography,  Geography,  Climatology. 
Dean,  John  C,  University  Club,  Indianapolis. 

Astronomy. 
Demaree,  Juan  B.,  State  House,  Indianapolis. 

Deputy  State  Entomologist. 

Botany. 
Denny,  Martha  L.,  Arbutus  Apartments,  Bloomington. 

Graduate  Student  in  Zoology,  Indiana  University. 
Deppe,  C.  A.,  Franklin. 

Franklin  College. 
Dietz,  Harry  F.,  Federal  Horticultural  Hall,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Entomology,   Eugenics,   Parasitology,   Plant   Pathology. 
Doan,  Martha,  Richmond. 

Professor  of  Chemistry,  Earlham. 
Dolan,  Jos.  P.,  Syracuse. 
Dostal,  Bernard  F.,  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Laboratory  of  Physics,  University  of  Pennsylvania. 
Douglas,  Benjamin  W.,  Trevlac. 

Fruit  Culture. 
Downhour,  D.  Elizabeth,  2307  Talbott  Ave.,  Indianapolis. 

Zoology  and  Botany,  Teachers  College. 
Driver,  Chas.  C,  416  E.  4th  St.,  Bloomington. 

Graduate  Student  in  Zoology,  Indiana  University. 
DuBois,  Henry  M.,  1408  Washington  Ave,,  LaGrande,  Oregon. 

Palaeontology  and  Ecology. 
Duncan,  David  Christie,  State  College,  Pa. 

Assistant  Professor  Physics,  Pennsylvania  State  College. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


28 

Earp,  Samuel  E.,  643  Occidental  Building,  Indianapolis. 

Physician. 
Edmonson,  Clarence  E.,  822  Atwater  Street,  Bloomington. 

Graduate  Student,  Physiology,  Indiana  University. 

Physiology. 
Emerson,  Charles  P.,  Hume-Mansur  Bldg.,  Indianapolis. 

Dean  Indiana  University  Medical  College. 

Medicine. 
Epple,  Wm.  F.,  234  Pierce  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Assistant  in   Dairy   Chemistry,   Experiment   Station,   Purdue 
University. 
Essex,  Jesse  Lyle,  262  Chauncey  Ave.,  West  Lafayette. 

Chemistry,  Purdue  University. 
Estabrook,  Arthur  H.,  219  E.  17th  St.,  Indianapolis. 

Genetics,  with  State  Board  of  Charities. 
Evans,  Samuel  G.,  1452  Upper  Second  St.,  Evansville. 

Merchant. 

Botany,  Ornithology. 
Felver,  William  P.,  325^  Market  St.,  Logansport. 

Railroad  Clerk. 

Geology,  Chemistry. 
Fisher,  Homer  Glenn,  Johns  Hopkins  Medical  School,  Baltimore,  Md. 

Student  in  Medicine. 
Fisher,  L.  W.,  16  Salisbury  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Student,  Zoology,  Purdue  University. 
Fisher,  Martin  L.,  Lafayette. 

Professor  of  Crop  Production,  Purdue  University. 

Agriculture,  Soils,  Crops,  Birds,  Botany. 
Foresman,  George  Kedzie,  110  S.  9th  Street,  Lafayette. 

Instructor  in  Chemistry,  Purdue  University. 
Froemming,  Albert  H.,  Station  D.,  R.  R.  3,  Milwaukee,  Wis. 

High  School  Instructor. 
Fulk,  Murl  E.,  1793  E.  24th  St.,  Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Anatomy. 
Fuller,  Frederic  D.,  4220  West  28th  St.,  Bryan,  Texas,  Experiment 

Station. 

Chemistry,  Nutrition. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


29 


Funk,  Austin,  404  Spring  St.,  Jeifersonville. 

Physician. 

Diseases  of  Eye,  Ear,  Nose  and  Throat. 
Galloway,  Jesse  James,  Geology  Department,  Columbia  University. 

New  York  City. 

Geology,  Paleontology. 
Gatch,  Willis  D.,  Indianapolis,  Indiana  University  Medical  School. 

Professor  of  Surgery. 

Anatomy. 
Gates,  Florence  A.,  3435  Detroit  Ave.,  Toledo,  Ohio. 

Teacher  of  Botany. 

Botany  and  Zoology. 
Gidley,  William,  123  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Professor  of  Pharmacy,  Purdue  University. 
Gillum,  Robert  G.,  Terre  Haute. 

State  Normal  School. 
Glenn,  Earl  R.,  New  York  City. 

The  Lincoln  School  of  Teachers  College,  Columbia  University. 

Physics. 
Goldsmith,  William  Morton,  Gunnison,  Colo. 

Colorado  State  Normal  School. 

Biology. 
Gottlieb,  Frederic  W.,  Morristown. 
Care  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Assistant  Curator,  Moores  Hill 

College. 

Archaeology,  Ethnology. 
Greene,  Frank  C,  30  N.  Yorktown  St.,  Tulsa,  Okla. 

Geology. 
Hadley,  Murray  N.,  51  Willoughby  Bldg.,  Indianapolis. 

Physician. 
Hammerschmidt,  Louis  M.,  Studebaker  Building,  South  Bend. 

Science  of  Law. 
Hanna,  U.  S.,  Bloomington. 

Professor  of  Mathematics. 
Hansford,  Hazel  Irene,  110  S.  Fess  St.,  Bloomington. 

Graduate  Student  in  Botany,  Indiana  University. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


30 

Happ,  William,  South  Bend. 

Botany. 
Harding,  C.  Francis,  503  University  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Head  of  Electrical  Engineering,  Purdue  University. 
Harman,  Paul  M.,  Ill  N.  Dunn  St.,  Bloomington. 

Physiology. 
Heimburger,  Harry  V.,  St.  Paul,  Minn. 

Instructor  in  Biology  in  Hamline  University. 
Heimlich,  Louis  Frederick,  Littleton  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Instructor  in  Botany,  Purdue  University. 
Hemmer,  John  Edwin,  Bloomington. 

Graduate  Student  in  Botany,  Indiana  University. 
Hendricks,  Victor  K.,  615  Frisco  Building,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Assistant  Chief  Engineer,  St.  L.  &  S.  F.  R.  R. 

Civil  Engineering  and  Wood  Preservation. 
Hess,  Walter  E.,  Greencastle. 

Professor  of  Biology,  DePauw  University. 
Hetherington,  John  P.,  417  Fourth  St.,  Logansport. 

Physician. 

Medicine,  Surgery,  X-Ray,  Electro-Therapeutics. 
Hinman,  Jack  J.,  Jr.,  State  University,  Iowa  City,  la. 

Senior  Water  Bacteriologist  and  Chemist,  Laboratories  for   State 
Board  of  Health. 

Chemistry  and  Biology. 
Hoffman,  George  L.,  321  Fourth  St.,  Logansport. 

Bacteriology. 
Hoge,  Mildred  Kirkwood  (Mrs.  Aute  Richards,  Crawfordsville,  Ind.) 

Recently  Instructor  in  Zoology,  Indiana  University. 
Hole,  Allen  D.,  615  National  Road,  Richmond. 

Professor  Earlham  College. 

Geology. 
Holman,  Richard  M.,  Crawfordsville. 

Professor  of  Botany,  Wabash  College. 
Houseman,  H.  B.,  901  Wabash  Ave.,  Crawfordsville. 

Instructor  in  Chemistry,  Wabash  College. 
Huber,  Leonard  L.,  Hanover. 

Zoology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


31 


Hurd,  Cloyd  C,  Crawfordsville. 

Zoology. 
Huchinson,  Emory,  Norman  Station,  Ind. 

Zoology. 
Hutton,  Joseph  Gladden,  Brookings,  South  Dakota. 

Associate  Professor  of  Agronomy,  State  College. 

Agronomy,  Geology. 
Hyslop,  George,  65  Nagle  St.,  New  York  City. 

Cornell  Medical  School. 
Iddings,  Arthur,  Hanover. 

Geology. 
Imel,  Herbert,  South  Bend. 

Zoology. 
Irving,  Thos.  P.,  Notre  Dame. 

Physics. 
Jackson,  Herbert  Spencer,  940  7th  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Botany,  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 
Jackson,  Thos.  F.,  Carter  Oil  Co.,  Tulsa,  Okla. 

Geology. 
Jacobson,  Moses  A.,  West  Lafayette. 

Instructor  in  Bacteriology,  Purdue  University. 
James,  Glenn,  West  Lafayette. 

Mathematics,  Purdue  University. 
Jordan,  Charles  Bernard,  West  Lafayette. 

Director  School  of  Pharmacy,  Purdue  University. 
Kaezmarek,  Regedius  M.,  Notre  Dame. 

Professor  of  Zoology. 
Knotts,  Armenis  F.,  800  Jackson  St.,  Gary. 

Nature  Study. 
Kohl,  Edwin  J.,  105  Fowler  Ave.,  West  Lafayette. 
Lee,  C.  O.,  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 
Leigh,  Howard,  307  N.  7th  St.,  Richmond. 

Student  in  Zoology,  Earlham  College. 
Liston,  Jesse  G.,  R.  F.  D.,  No.  2,  Lewis. 

High  School  Teacher. 

Geology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


32 

Loomis,  Nathaniel  E.,  127  Waldron  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Assistant  Professor  of  Chemistry,  Purdue  University. 

Physical  Chemistry. 
Ludwig,  C.  A.,  R.  R.  1,  Brookville. 

Botany. 
Ludy,  L.  v.,  600  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Professor  Experimental  Engineering,  Purdue  University. 

Experimental  Engineering  in  Steam  and  Gas. 
Mahin,  Edward  G.,  27  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Associate  Professor  of  Chemistry,  Purdue  University. 
Mains,  E.  B.,  212  S.  Grant  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

U.  S.  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 

Plant  Pathology  and  Mycology. 
Malott,  Burton  J.,  2206  Calhoun  St.,  Fort  Wayne. 

Teacher  in  High  School. 

Physical  Geography  and  Geology. 
Malott,  Clyde  A.,  316  East  2nd  St.,  Bloomington. 

Geology. 
Markle,  M.  S.,  Richmond. 

Professor  of  Botany,  Earlham  College. 
Martin,  Dr.  H.  H.,  LaPorte,  Ind. 

Surgery  and  Urology. 
Mason,  Preston  Walter,  128  Andrew  Place,  West  Lafayette. 

Entomology,  Purdue  University  and  Experiment  Station. 
Mason,  T.  E.,  130  Andrew  Place,  West  Lafayette. 

Instructor  Mathematics,  Purdue  University. 

Mathematics. 
McCarthy,  Morris  E.,  224  Fowler  Ave.,  West  Lafayette. 

Student  in  Zoology,  Purdue  University. 
Mclndoo,  N.  E.,  7225  Blair  Road,  Takoma  Park,  Washington,  D.  C. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture,  Bureau  of  Entomology. 

Insect  Physiology. 
McKinley,  Lester,  Bloomington. 

Graduate  Student  in  Botany,  Indiana  University. 
Miller,  Fred  A.,  Greenfield. 

Botanist  for  Eli  Lilly  Co. 

Botany,  Plant  Breeding. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


33 


Molby,  Fred  A.,  525  S.  Park  Ave.,  Bloomington. 

Physics. 
Montgromery,  Charles  E.,  360  Augusta  Avenue,  DeKalb,  111. 

Assistant  Professor  of  Biology,  Normal  School. 
Montgomery,  Ethel,  South  Bend. 

Physics. 
Montgomery,  Dr.  H.  T.,  244  Jefferson  Bldg.,  South  Bend. 

Geology. 
Moore,  Bruce  V.,  710  S.  Fess  Ave.,  Bloomington. 

Graduate  Student  and  Assistant  in  Psychology. 
Morrison,  Harold,  Federal  Horticultural  Board,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Entomology. 
Morrison,  Louis,  80  S.  West  St.,  Richmond  (France). 
Munro,  G.  W.,  202  Waldron  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Mechanical  Engineering. 
Murray,  Thos.  J.,  Blacksbury,  Va. 

Bacteriology,  Virginia  Polytechnic  Institute. 
Myers,  B.  D.,  321  N.  Washington  St.,  Bloomington. 

Professor  of  Anatomy,  Indiana  University. 
Nelson,  Ralph  Emory,  125  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Chemistry,  Purdue  University. 
Nothnagel,  Mildred,  Gainesville,  Fla. 

Assistant  Plant  Physiology,  Experiment  Station,  Univ.  of  Fla. 
Noyes,  Harry  A.,  705  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Chemistry  and  Bacteriology,  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 
Oberholzer,  H.  C,  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Biology. 
O'Neal,  Claude  E.,  Delaware,  Ohio. 

Associate  Professor  of  Botany,  Wesleyan  University. 

Botany. 
Orahood,  Harold,  Kingman. 

Geology. 
Osner,  G.  A.,  216  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Assistant  Botanist  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 

Plant  Pathology. 

3—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


34 

Owen,  D.  A.,  200  South  State  St.,  Franklin. 

Professor  of  Biology.     (Retired.) 

Biology. 
Papish,  Jacob,  737  Atwater  St.,  Bloomington. 

Instructor  in  Chemistry,  Indiana  University. 
Peifer,  Harvey  Creighton,  115  Lutz  Ave.,  West  Lafayette. 

Head  of  Chemical  Engineering,  Purdue  University. 
Petry,  Edward  Jacob,  115  University  Street,  West  Lafayette. 

Assistant  Professor  of  Agricultural  Botany,  Purdue  University. 

Botany,  Plant  Breeding,  Plant  Pathology,  Bio-Chemistry. 
Pickett,  Fermen  L.,  Pullman  College  Station,  Washington. 

Botany. 
Pinkerton,  Earl,  Orleans,  Ind. 

Zoology. 
Pipal,  F.  J.,  114  S.  Salisbury  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Botany>  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 
Powell,  Horace,  Hazleton. 

Zoology. 
Prentice,  Burr  N.,  400  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Assistant  Professor  of  Forestry,  Purdue. 
Price,  Earl,  Valparaiso. 

County  Agent,  Harrisburg,  111. 
Ramsey,  Earl  E.,  Bloomington. 

Principal  High  School. 
Ramsey,  Glenn  Blaine,  Orono,  Me. 

Botany. 
Rice,  Thurman  Brooks,  Winona  Lake. 

Botany. 
Richards,  Aute,  409  S.  Water  Street,  Crawfordsville. 

Professor  of  Zoology,  Wabash  College. 
Rifenburg,  S.  A.,  Cutler. 

Instructor  in  Biologry,  Valparaiso  University. 

Botany. 
Riley,  Katherine,  56  Whittier  Place,  Indianapolis. 

Student  in  Zoology. 
Roark,  Louis,  221  E.  3rd  St.,  Bloomington. 

Assistant  Professor  of  Geology,  Indiana  University. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


35 


Robbins,  Fred  E.,  423  Russell  St,,  West  Lafayette. 

Agriculture,  Purdue  University. 
Schaeifer,  Robert  G.,  Montpelier. 

Principal  High  School. 

Science. 
Scott,  W.  R.  M.,  West  Lafayette. 

Agricultural  Botany,  Purdue  University. 
Sheak,  William  H.,  2008  Parrish  Street,  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Mammalogy. 
Shiner,  Dr.  Will,  Indianapolis. 

Director,  State  Laboratory  of  Hygiene. 
Showalter,  Ralph  W.,  Indianapolis. 

With  Eli  Lilly  &  Co. 

Biology. 
Silvey,  Oscar  W.,  College  Station,  Texas. 

Physics,  University  of  Texas. 
Smith,  Chas.  Piper,  College  Park,  Md. 

Associate  Professor,  Botany,  Maryland  Agricultural  College. 

Botany. 
Smith,  William  W.,  401  Russell  Street,  West  Lafayette. 

Biology,  Genetics,  Purdue  University. 
Snodgrass,  R.  E.,  2063  Park  Road,  Washington,  D.  C. 

U.  S.  Bureau  of  Entomology,  Extension  Division. 

Entomology. 
Southgate,  Helen  A.,  218  West  6th  St.,  Michigan  City. 

Physiography  and  Botany. 
Spitzer,  George,  1000  7th  Street,  West  Lafayette. 

Dairy  Chemist,  Purdue  University. 

Chemistry. 
Spong,  P.,  3873  East  Washington  St.,  Indianapolis. 

Biology. 
Stoltz,  Charles,  530  N.  Lafayette  St.,  South  Bend. 

Physician. 
Stone,  Ralph  Bushnell,  307  Russell  Street,  West  Lafayette. 

Mathematics,  Purdue  University. 
Stork,  Harvey  Elmer,  Huntingburg. 

Botany. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


36 

Taylor,  Joseph  C,  117  9th  St.,  Logansport. 

Student  in  University  of  Wisconsin. 
Terry,  Oliver  P.,  State  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Professor  of  Physiolog:y,  Purdue  University. 
Tetrault,  Philip  Armand,  West  Lafayette. 

Assistant  Professor  of  Biology,  Purdue  University. 
Tevis,  Emma  Louise,  122  West  18th  Sf.,  Indianapolis. 

Student  in  Zoology. 
Thompson,  Albert  W.,  Owensville. 

Merchant. 

Geology. 
Thompson,  Clem  O.,  105  N.  High  St.,  Salem. 

Principal  High  SchooL 
Thombum,  A.  D.,  Indianapolis,  care  Pitman-Moore  Co. 

Chemistry. 
Timmons,  George  D.,  Valparaiso. 

Dean  of  School  of  Pharmacy,  Valparaiso  University. 

Chemistry. 
Toole,  E.  H.,  719  N.  Main  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Assistant  Professor  of  Botany,  Purdue  University. 
Troop,  James,  West  Lafayette. 

Professor  of  Ent<Hnology,  Purdue  University. 
Tucker,  William  Motier,  Apartment  33,  Alhambra  Court,  Columbus,  O. 

Ohio  State  University,  Department  of  Geology. 
Tucker,  Forest  Glen,  Columbus,  Ohio. 

Geology  Department,  University  of  Ohio. 

Geology. 
Turner,  B.  B.,  Indiana  University  School  of  Medicine,  Indianapolis. 

Associate  Professor  of  Pharmacology. 
Turner,  William  P.,  222  Lutz  Avenue,  Lafayette. 

Professor  of  Practical  Mathematics,  Purdue  University. 
Vallance,  Chas.  A.,  R.  R.  J.  No.  1,  Box  132,  Indianapolis. 

Instructor  Emmerich  Manual  Training  School. 

Chemistry. 
Van  Doren,  Dr.  Lloyd,  Earlham  College,  Richmond. 

Chemistry. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


37 


Van  Nuys,  W.  C,  Box  No.  34,  Newcastle. 

Superintendent,  Indiana  Epileptic  Village,  Fort  Wayne. 
Voorhees,  Herbert  S.,  804  Wildwood  Ave.,  Fort  Wayne. 

Instructor  in  Chemistry  and  Botany,  Fort  Wayne  High  School. 

Chemistry,  Botany. 
Walters,  Arthur  L.,  Indianapolis,  care  Eli  Lilly  Col 
Warren,  Don  Cameron,  Bloomington. 

Graduate  Studept,  Zoology,  Indiana  University. 
Watson,  Carl  G.,  120  Thornell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Instructor  in  Physics,  Purdue  University. 
Weatherwax,  Paul,  Bloomington. 

Botany. 
Webster,  L.  B.,  Terre  Haute. 
Weems,  M.  L.,  102  Garfield  Ave.,  Valparaiso. 

Professor  of  Botany. 

Botany  and  Human  Physiology. 
Weyant,  James  E.,  336  Audubon  Road,  Indianapolis. 

Teacher  of  Physics,  Shortridge  High  School. 

Physics. 
Whiting,  Rex  Anthony,  118  Marstellar  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Veterinary  Department,  Purdue  University. 
Wiancko,  Alfred  T.,  230  S.  9th  St.,  Lafayette. 

Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops,  Purdue  University. 

Agronomy. 
Wiley,  Ralph  Benjamin,  770  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Hydraulic  Engineering,  Purdue  University. 
Williams,  A.  A.,  Valparaiso. 

Mathematics,  Valparaiso  University. 

Mathematics,  Astronomy. 
Williams,  Kenneth  P.,  Bloomington. 

Instructor  Mathematics,  Indiana  University. 
Wilson,  Charles  E.,  211  Dunn  St.,  Bloomington. 

Graduate  Student,  Zoology  and  Economic  Entor.iology,  Indiana 
University. 
Wilson,  Mrs.  Etta  L.,  2  Clarendon  Avenue,  Detroit,  Mich. 

Botany  and  Zoology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


38 

Wilson,  Guy  West,  Carmel. 

Mycology  and  Plant  Pathology. 
Wisner,  Eber  Hugh,  Valparaiso. 

Pharmacy,  Valparaiso  University. 
Wood,  Harry  W.,  1538  Rosemont  Avenue,  Chicago,  111. 
Woodbury,  C.  G.,  615  University  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Director  of  Experiment  Station. 
Wynn,  Frank  B.,  Indianapolis. 

Professor  of  Pathology,  Indiana  University  School  of  Medicine. 
Yoeman,  R.  C,  West  Lafayette. 

Highway  Engineering,  Purdue  University. 
Young,  Gilbert  A.,  739  Owen  St.,  Lafayette. 

Head  of  Department  of  Mechanical  Engineering,  Purdue  Uni- 
versity. 
Young,  Simon  J.,  Valparaiso. 

Physician,  Lt.  Col.,  M.  C,  N.  A. 
Zehring,  William  Arthur,  303  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Assistant  Professor  of  Mathematics,  Purdue  University. 

Mathematics. 

Fellows    '. . .  .     65 

Members,  Active  231 

Members  and  Fellows,  Non-resident 38 

Total 334 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


39 


Minutes  op  the  Spring  Meeting, 

INDIANA  ACADEMY  OF  SCIENCE, 

May  17  and  18,  1917. 


The  spring  meeting  of  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Science  was  held 
Thursday  and  Friday,  May  17  and  18,  1917,  at  Purdue  University,  in 
connection  with  the  dedication  of  the  new  biology  building,  Stanley 
Coulter  Hall  of  Biology. 

Thursday  Afternoon — 2:00  o'clock,  May  17th. 

Reception  of  the  building  for  the  University  and  address  by  President 

W.  E.  Stone. 
Brief  Addresses  by — 

President  W.  J.  Moenkhaus,  representing  the  Indiana  Academy  of 
Science; 

John  S.  Wright,  Esq.,  representing  the  Alumni; 

Dr.  H.  C.  Cowles,  Chicago  University,  on  Botany; 

Dr.  C.  H.  Eigenmann,  Indiana  University,  on  Zoology. 

A  complimentary  supper  was  served  to  members  of  the  Academy 
and  invited  guests,  at  6:00  o'clock,  in  Stanley  Coulter  Hall  of  Biology. 

Thursday  Evening — 8:00  o'clock. 
Address — 

"The  Modem  Biological  Laboratory  and  Public  Health,"  Professor 
W.  T.  Sedgwick,  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology. 

Friday,  May  18th,  Field  Trip. 
The  members  of  the  Academy  and  guests  assembled  at  Stanley 
Coulter  Hall  of  Biology  at  8:00  o'clock  a.  m.  The  loaded  automobiles 
started  out  at  half-minute  intervals  for  the  trip.  It  was  planned  espe- 
cially to  view  Pine  Creek  valley  and  vicinity.  The  automobiles  proceeded 
along  the  lowland  of  the  Wabash  River  to  Granville  Bridge,  thence  to 
Greenhill  and  across  the  upland  to  Rainsville,  thence  along  Pine  Creek 
to  the  "Narrows"  of  Mud  Creek,  one  of  its  tributaries,  where  luncheon 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


40 

was  served.  From  the  "Narrows"  the  party  proceeded  to  Mudlavia, 
thence  to  Attica,  and  then  to  Lafayette,  following  the  Wabash  River. 

The  trip  afforded  an  opportunity  to  visit  the  Native  White  Pine 
regions  of  northwestern  Indiana.  At  the  high  bridge  east  of  the  Warren 
County  Farm  detached  rocks  and  high  cliffs  were  of  extreme  interest  to 
geologists  and  students  of  physiography.  This  is  the  northern  extensioii 
of  the  geologic  features  which  occur  at  Turkey  Run. 

Many  of  the  party  walked  from  the  Warren  County  Farm  to  the 
"Narrows." 

Business  Session. 

The  meeting  was  called  to  order,  after  luncheon,  on  a  hill-side  near 
Mud  Creek  west  of  Attica,  by  President  W.  J.  Moenkhaus.  Sixty  mem- 
bers attended  the  meeting,  and  about  thirty  additional  persons  partici- 
pated in  the  field  trip  and  luncheon,  as  guests  of  the  Academy. 

In  the  absence  of  members  of  the  Membership  Committee  the  Sec- 
retary submitted  the  names  of  persons  proposed  for  membership.  On 
motion,  duly  passed,  they  were  elected  to  membership  in  the  Academy. 
The  new  members  are : 

Michael  James  Blew,  215  Indiana  AvenUe,  Bloomington. 

Hobart  Cromwell,  Terre  Haute. 

Richard  G.  Dukes,  West  7th  Street,  West  Lafayette. 

Loyal  W.  Fisher,  16  Salisbury  Street,  West  Lafayette. 

Armenis  F.  Knotts,  800  Jackson  Street,  Gary. 

Edwin  J.  Kohl,  105  Fowler  Avenue,  West  Lafayette. 

H.  H.  Martin,  M.  D.,  Laporte. 

CO.  Lee,  Russell  Street,  West  Lafayette. 

Morris  E.  McCarty,  224  Fowler  Avenue,  West  Lafayette. 

Louis  A.  Morrison,  80  S.  West  7th  Street,  West  Lafayette. 

George  W.  Munro,  202  Waldron  Street,  West  Lafayette. 

Robert  E.  Snodgrass,  1819  N.  New  Jersey  Street,  Indianapolis. 

Carl  G.  Watson,  120  Thomell  Street,  West  Lafayette. 

Charles  G.  Woodbury,  615  University  Street,  West  Lafayette. 

Amos  W.  Butler  reported  the  continuance  of  the  annual  appropria- 
tion of  $1,200  by  the  State  Legislature  for  the  purpose  of  printing  the 
Proceedings. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


41 

R.  W.  McBride  discussed  the  matter  of  urging  the  Printing  Board 
to  speed  up  its  work  on  the  1916  Proceedings. 

On  motion,  duly  passed,  a  committee  consisting  of  the  President, 
Secretary,  and  Judge  McBride,  is  authorized  to  visit  the  Governor  in 
an  effort  to  hasten  the  work  of  publication  of  the  Proceedings. 

On  motion,  Editor  Lee  F.  Bennett  is  empowered  to  use  his  discre- 
tion in  making  up  the  1916  Proceedings,  by  elimination  of  some  of  the 
papers,  or  to  reduce  their  length  if  they  would  otherwise  add  too  much 
to  the  size  and  cost  of  the  volume. 

It  is  further  urged  that  an  effort  be  made  to  embody  in  the  1916 
Proceedings  a  paper  by  Professor  Hadley  of  Monrovia,  on  "David  Worth 
Dennis — ^An  Appreciation." 

On  motion,  the  Committee  on  Distribution  of  Proceedings  is  to  fix 
prices  at  which  back  numbers  of  the  publication  may  be  procured,  and 
to  report  at  the  Fall  Meeting. 

The  following  resolutions  by  Frank  B.  Wynn,  on  the  State  Parks, 
and  by  Amos  W.  Butler,  on  Appreciations,  were  received,  and  passed  by 
the  Academy: 

Resolved,  That  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Science  most  heartily  ap- 
proves the  attitude  of  the  Governor  of  the  State  in  promoting  the  move- 
ments for  State  Parks;  first,  because  it  will  insure  the  preservation  of 
native  forests,  and  beautiful  natural  places  which  are  now  rapidly  being 
destroyed  and  can  not  be  replaced. 

Secondly,  We  urge  their  preservation  as  health  and  recreation  pre- 
serves for  all  the  people  for  all  time  to  come. 

In  the  midst  of  this,  the  largest  Spring  Meeting  of  the  Indiana 
Academy  of  Science,  we  express  our  appreciation  of  the  fine  hospitality 
of  Purdue  University,  which  has  made  this  occasion  a  remarkably  suc- 
cessful one.  To  President  Stone,  Dean  Coulter  and  all  of  his  associates, 
to  the  ladies  for  the  welcome  luncheon,  and  to  the  ladies  of  the  House- 
hold Economics  Department,  for  the  splendid  supper,  our  grateful 
acknowledgments  are  made,  and  to  all  who  have  contributed  to  this 
meeting  our  sincere  thanks  are  given. 

We  also  wish  to  make  formal  recognition  of  the  notable  advance 
made  by  Purdue  University  in  the  erection  of  the  new  biology  building, 
so  well  planned  for  its  purpose  and  so  well  built,  to  express  our  appre- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


42 

elation  of  the  wisdom  shown  in  naming  it  for  the  Head  of  the  Depart- 
ment of  Biology,  Dr.  Stanley  Coulter,  a  distinguished  and  beloved  mem- 
ber of  this  body. 

Professor  McBeth  of  the  State  Normal  School,  was  then  called  upon 
to  speak  briefly  of  the  geological  formation  of  the  region  covered  in  the 
field  trip,  after  which  the  meeting  adjourned. 

W.  J.  MOENKHAUS,  President. 

Howard  E.  Enders,  Secretary. 

Evening — Friday,  May  18th. 
Reception  to  members  of  the  Academy  in  Stanley  Coulter  Hall  of 
Biology,  by  the  University  Club. 

Saturday — May  19,  1917. 
A  number  of  the  members  of  the  Academy  joined  in  a  visit  to  the 
Tippecanoe  Battlefield  and  the  State  Soldiers'  Home. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


13 


Minutes  of  the  Fall  Meeting, 

INDIANA  ACADEMY  OF  SCIENCE, 

INDIANA  UNIVERSITY,  BLOOMINGTON,  INDIANA, 
December  6, 1917. 


The  Executive  Committee  of  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Science  met  in 
the  Faculty  Room  of  Maxwell  Hall,  and  was  called  to  order  by  the 
President,  W.  J.  Moenkhaus,  of  Bloomington.  The  following  members 
were  present:  F.  M.  Andrews,  Lee  F.  Bennett,  Wm.  M.  Blanchard,  H. 
L.  Bruner,  W.  A.  Cogshall,  C.  C.  Deam,  Howard  E.  Enders,  Edwin 
Morrison,  D.  M.  Mottier,  Will  Scott,  Charles  Stoltz,  and  John  S.  Wright. 

The  minutes  of  the  Executive  Committee  of  1916  were  read  and 
approved. 

The  reports  of  the  standing  committees  were  then  taken  up. 

Program  Committee — F.  M.  Andrews,  Chairman,  reported  the  work 
completed  as  indicated  by  the  printed  program  of  fifty-one  titles.  On 
motion,  the  following  title,  which  arrived  too  late  for  entry,  was  added  to 
the  program:  "Disposition  and  Intelligence  of  the  Chimpanzee",  by  W. 
Henry  Sheak,  of  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Committee  on  Distribution  of  Proceedings — Howard  E.  Enders, 
chairman,  reported  that  the  1915  Proceedings  had  been  sent  out  since  the 
last  meeting,  through  the  co-operation  of  the  State  Librarian,  and  that 
the  1916  issue,  now  in  page-proof,  will  be  mailed  as  early  as  possible. 

CoTnmittee  on  Restriction  of  Weeds  and  Diseases — D.  M.  Mottier, 
member,  reported  informally  upon  the  possible  value  of  the  work  of  such 
committee,  but  that  in  view  of  the  fact  that  the  State  Board  of  Health 
and  other  agencies  in  the  State  are  engaged  in  such  work,  it  would  seem 
to  be  unnecessary  to  continue  this  committee. 

On  motion,  duly  passed,  the  committee  is  discharged,  and  this  com- 
mittee hereafter  is  to  be  discontinued. 

Committee  on  Relations  of  the  Academy  to  the  State — John  S. 
Wright  reported  for  the  committee  that  the  customary  twelve  hundred 
($1,200)  dollar  appropriation  has  been  made  available  for  the  printing 
of  the  Proceedings. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


44 

Committee  on  Publication  of  Proceedings — Lee  F.  Bennett,  chairman 
and  Editor,  reported  on  the  incidents  in  delay  of  Proceedings.  Half  of 
the  page-proofs  are  now  in  hand,  and  others  will  be  received  soon. 

On  motion,  the  Editor  of  Proceedings  is  to  be  allowed  the  sum  of 
fifty  ($50)  dollars  for  expense  of  clerical  hire  for  the  1916  issue.  It  is 
the  sense  of  the  Executive  Committee  that  this  sum  be  continued  from 
year  to  year. 

Advisory  Council — John  S.  Wright  and  W.  A.  Cogshall  reported  for 
the  committee  that  they  had  conferred  with  the  Governor  of  the  State 
relative  to  the  matter  of  placing  properly  qualified  men  in  the  scientific 
offices  of  the  State,  and  that  he  had  given  assurance  of  such  co-operation. 

Committee  on  Academy  Foundation — The  report  of  this  special  com- 
mittee, appointed  a  year  ago,  was  read  by  the  chairman,  H.  L.  Bruner. 

On  motion,  the  report  is  hereby  received  and  is  to  be  submitted  to 
the  members  of  the  Academy  for  consideration  at  the  business  session  to- 
morrow. 

Wm.  M.  Blanchard,  Treasurer,  reported  as  follows: 

Balance  in  Treasury  December  2,  1916 $378  49 

Dues  collected  during  the  year 344  00 

Total $722  49 

Expenditures    197  91 

Balance  in  treasury,  December  1,  1917 $524  58 

The  report  was  received  and,  in  the  absence  of  P.  N.  Evans,  was 
referred  to  W.  A.  Cogshall  for  audit. 

There  were  no  reports  from  the  committees  on  State  Library  and 
Biological  Survey. 

H.  E,  Enders  reported  relative  to  the  matter  of  setting  a  price  for 
back  nimibers  of  the  Proceedings,  as  directed  at  the  Lafayette  Spring 
Meeting.  The  committee  advises  that,  inasmuch  as  the  State  pays  for 
the  publication  of  the  Proceedings,  we  have  no  authority  to  offer  for 
sale  or  receive  money  for  copies  of  the  Proceedings.  It  is  advised  that 
the  practice  be  followed  of  sending  copies  to  interested  workers  upon 
application,  and  prepayment  of  the  carriage  charges. 

On  motion,  a  committee  of  three  was  appointed  to  prepare  amend- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


45 

ments  to  the  Constitution  and  By-Laws  to  define  the  duties  of  Editor  of 
Proceedings,  and  to  recognize  the  position  as  an  officer  of  the  Executive 
Committee. 

John  S.  Wright,  Lee  F.  Bennett  and  W.  A.  Cogshall  were  appointed 
to  serve  as  members  of  this  committee. 

On  motion  it  is  recommended  that  the  1918  Program  Committee  de- 
termine the  feasibility  of  inviting  the  members  of  the  Illinois  Academy 
of  Science  to  hold  their  Spring  Meeting  as  a  joint  meeting  with  the 
Indiana  Academy  of  Science,  at  some  time  and  place  to  be  determined  by 
the  committees  of  these  Academies. 

Adjourned. 

W.  J.  MoENKHAUS,  President. 
Howard  E.  Enders,  Secretary. 

GENERAL   SESSION. 
Science  Hall,  10:15  a.  m.,  Dec-  7,  1917. 

The  meeting  called  to  order  by  President  W.  J.  Moenkhaus. 

In  accordance  with  the  arrangements  of  the  Progrram  Committee  the 
Academy  proceeded  at  once  with  the  reading  of  the  general  papers  num- 
bered 1  to  5,  after  which  the  body  went  into  bnsinss  session. 

Business: 

The  minutes  of  the  Executive  Committee  were  read  and  approved. 

The  report  of  the  committee  appointed  to  investigate  the  advisability 
of  establishing  a  research  endowment  fund  to  be  known  as  the  Academy 
Foundation,  was  received  and  was  considered  at  some  length,  after  which 
the  following  resolution  was  passed :  • 

Resolved,  That  the  Academy  expresses  sympathy  in  the  movement 
and  refers  the  matter  back  to  the  Committee  on  Academy  Foundation 
for  further  amplification,  and  for  private  publication  and  circulation 
among  members  of  the  Academy  during  the  ensuing  year,  with  a  view 
to  its  consideration  in  1918. 

Auditor  W.  A.  Cogshall  reported  upon  the  correctness  of  the  report 
of  the  Treasurer. 

Report  of  progress  in  the  Biological  Survey  was  made  by  chairman, 
C.  C.  Deam. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


46 

The  following  named  persons  were  proposed  for  membership,  and 
were  elected : 

Harold  R.  Brown,  Earlham  College,  Richmond,  Indiana. 

Anna  Mary  Collins,  Irvington,  Indianapolis,  Indiana. 

Martha  L.  Denny,  Bloomington. 

Charles  S.  Driver,  Bloomington. 

Walter  N.  Hess,  Greencastle. 

Richard  M.  Holman,  Crawfordsville. 

Moses  A.  Jacobson,  West  Lafayette. 

Jacob  Papish,  Bloomington. 

Louis  Roark,  Bloomington. 

Lewis  A.  Taylor,  Earlham  College,  Richmond. 

Eben  Henry  Toole,  West  Lafayette. 

The  following  named  members  were  elected  Fellows: 

J.  A.  Badertscher.  Professor  of  Anatomy,  Indiana  University. 

Charles  A.  Behrens,  Professor  of  Bacteriology,  Purdue  University. 

Edward  W.  Koch,  Department  of  Research,  Eli  Lilly  Co.,  Indian- 
apolis. 

William  M.  Logan,  Associate  Professor  of  Geology,  Indiana  Uni- 
versity. 

Barnard  Schockel,  Professor  of  Geography,  State  Normal  School. 

The  report  of  the  Nominating  Committee  was  as  follows: 

President — E.  B.  Williamson,  Bluffton. 
Vice-President — Dr.  Charles  Stoltz,  South  Bend. 
Secretary — Howard  E.  Enders,  West  Lafayette. 
Assistant  Secretary — P.  A.  Tetrault,  West  Lafayette. 
Treasurer — Wm.  M.  Blanchard,  Greencastle. 
Editor — Lee  F.  Bennett,  Valparaiso. 
Press  Secretary — Frank  B.  Wade,  Indianapolis, 

The  Committee  on  Amendments  moved  the  following  amendments 
to  the  Constitution  and  By-Laws,  for  final  action  to-morrow: 

Amendment  to  Constitution,  Article  III,  Section  1,  second  sentence,  by 
insertion  of  the  word  "Editor"  after  the  words  "Press  Secretary." 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


47 


The  article  and  section  so  amended  will  read: 


"Section  1.  The  officers  of  this  Academy  shall  be  chosen  by  ballot, 
at  the  annual  meeting,  and  shall  hold  office  one  year.  They  shall  con- 
sist of  a  President,  Vice-President,  Secretary,  Assistant  Secretary,  Press 
Secretary,  Editor,  and  Treasurer,  who  shall  perform  the  duties  usually 
pertaining  to  their  respective  offices  and  in  addition,  with  ex-presidents 
of  the  Academy,  shall  constitute  an  Executive  Committee.  The  Presi- 
dent shall,  at  each  annual  meeting,  appoint  two  members  to  be  a  com- 
mittee, which  shall  prepare  the  programs  and  have  charge  of  the  ar- 
rangements for  all  meetings  for  one  year." 

Amendment  to  the  By-Laws: 

"By-Law  8.  An  Editor  shall  be  elected  from  year  to  year.  His 
duties  shall  be  to  edit  the  annual  Proceedings.  No  allowance  shall  be 
made  to  the  Editor  for  clerical  assistance  on  account  of  any  one  edition 
of  the  Proceedings  in  excess  of  fifty  ($50)  dollars  except  by  special 
action  of  the  Executive  Committee." 

Afternoon  Session — 1:30  p.  m. 

Papers  numbered  6,  7,  and  8  were  read  in  general  session  after 
which  the  Academy  adjourned  to  sectional  meetings.  President  Moenk- 
haus  served  as  chairman  of  the  section  on  Bacteriology,  Botany  and 
Zoology;  and  Edwin  Morrison  presided  over  the  section  on  Astronomy, 
Chemistry,  Geology  and  Physics. 

Evening  Sessions. 

The  address  of  the  retiring  President,  Professor  W.  J.  Moenkhaus, 
was  delivered  at  the  informal  dinner,  at  the  Cafeteria,  at  7:00  p.  m. 

At  8:30  Professor  Charles  T.  Knipp,  of  the  University  of  Illinois, 
addressed  the  members  of  the  Academy  and  guests  on  the  subject :  "Elec- 
tric Discharge  in  Vacuum  Tubes — The  Electron."  The  extensive  equip- 
ment and  the  facilities  of  the  Department  of  Physics  made  it  possible  to 
illustrate  the  whole  of  the  lecture  in  a  striking  manner. 

A  smoker  and  informal  entertainment  was  given  by  the  Sigma  Xi 
Scientific  Fraternity  at  the  Faculty  Club  rooms  immediately  after  Pro- 
fessor Knipp's  address. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


48 

Saturday,  December  8, 1917. 
BtLsiness : 

The  meeting  was  called  to  order  at  8:45  by  President  Moenkhaus. 

The  amendments  to  the  Constitution  and  By-Laws  were  called  for 
second  reading,  and  were  passed  on  motion. 

The  following  named  Fellows  were  elected  Non-Resident  Fellows: 

Charles  Zeleny,  Professor  of  Experimental  Zoology,  University  of 
Illinois,  Urbana,  Illinois. 

Severance  Burrage,  Resident  of  Massachusetts,  now  with  a  medical 
commission  in  Serbia. 

The  matter  of  the  Spring  Meeting  was  discussed.  In  view  of  the 
fact  that  members  of  the  Illinois  Academy  of  Science  have  suggested 
that  a  joint  meeting  be  held  with  their  Academy  it  is  advised  that  the 
1918  Program  Committee  take  up  the  matter  and  determine  whether 
this  is  feasible;  if  so  to  complete  the  plans,  otherwise  to  determine  a 
place  and  time  for  an  independent  meeting. 

The  Academy  adopted  the  following  resolution  presented  by  Wm.  M. 
Blanchard : 

Resolved:  That  we  extend  to  Indiana  University,  and  particularly 
to  the  members  of  the  Academy  who  are  connected  with  the  University, 
as  well  as  to  our  special  visitor.  Professor  Charles  T.  Knipp,  a  vote  of 
thanks  for  the  entertainment  and  courtesy  manifested  at  this  December 
meeting  of  the  Academy. 

The  Academy  then  went  into  general  session  for  the  reading  such 
papers  as  remain  from  the  several  sections. 

Adjourned. 

W.  J.  Moenkhaus,  President. 
Howard  E.  Enders,  Secretary. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


49 
Program  op  the  Thirty-third  Annual  Meeting, 

OP  THB 

INDIANA  ACADEMY  OF  SCIENCE, 

RBLD  AT 

Indiana  University,  Bloomington,  Ind., 
Friday  and  Saturday,  December  7  and  8,  1917. 

OFFICERS. 

W.  J.  MOENKHAUS,  President 
Edwin  Morrison,  Vice-President 
Howard  E.  Enders,  Secretary 
William  M.  Blanchard,  Treasurer 
P.  A.  Tetrault,  Assistant  Secretary 
Frank  B.  Wade,  Press  Secretary 
Lee  F.  Bennett,  Editor 

PROGRAM  COMMITTEE. 

F.  M.  Andrews  H.  L.  Bruner 

Stanley  Coulter 

GENERAL  PROGRAM 
Thursday. 
Meeting  of  the   Executive  Committee  in  the   Faculty  Club 

Rooms    8 :00  p.m. 

Friday. 

Business  Session 11 :30  a.m. 

General  Session  10 :00  a.m. 

Sectional  Meetings  1 :30  p.m. 

Informal  Dinner  at  the  Cafeteria 7 :00  p.m. 

The  address  of  the  retiring  President,  Professor  William  J.  Moenkhaus, 

of  Indiana  University,  will  be  delivered  at  this  time. 
Address  by  Professor  Charles  T.  Knipp 8:30  p.m. 

4—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


50 

Subject:    Electric  Discharge  in  Vacuum  Tubes — ^"The  Electron,"  Science 

Hall,  Room  38. 

A  smoker  will  be  given  by  the  Sigma  Xi  Scientific  Fraternity  at  the 
Faculty  Club  Rooms  immediately  after  Professor  Knipp's  address. 

Saturday. 
Business  Session    8 :00  ajn. 

GENERAL  SESSION. 
Friday,  10:00  a.m. 

1.  Transplantation  of  Testes  into  Ovariectomized  Female  Guinea 

Pigs,  5  min By  Mathew  Winters 

Presented  by  Dr.  B.  D.  Myers,  Indiana  University. 

2.  The  Physiography  of  Indianapolis,  15  min.  (by  title)  .Chas.  R.  Dryer 

3.  The  Pygidiidae,  30  min C.  H.  Eigenmann,  Indiana  University 

4.  Some  criteria  of  Skeletal  Homologies,  15  min 

J.  S.  Kingsley,  University  of  Illinois 

5.  A  Fish  Epidemic  in  Huffman's  Lake,  10  min 

Will  Scott,  Indiana  University 

6.  Germinal  Changes  Affecting   Facet  Number  in  the  Bar-eyed 

Race  of  Drosophila,  10  min 

Charles  Zeleny,  University  of  Illinois 

7.  The  Dwarfing  Effect  of  Attacks  of  Mites  of  the  Genus  Eriophy- 

dae  upon  Norway  Maples,  10  min 

."Howard  E.  Enders,  Purdue  University 

8.  Where  the  Feeble-minded  are  Self-supporting,  12  min 

Hazel  I.  Hansford,  Indiana  University 

SECTIONAL  MEETINGS. 

Friday  1:30  p.m.  and  Saturday  8:30  a.m. 

Astronomy, 

1.  A  New  Form  of  Telescope  Mounting,  10  min 

W.  A.  Cogshall,  Indiana  University 

Bacteriology, 

2.  Bacterial  Action  on  Proteins  in  presence  of  Carbohydrates,  10 

min .  H.  M.  Weeter,  Purdue  Univ. ;  George  Spitzer,  Purdue  Univ. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


51 

3.  Hydrolysis  of  Proteins  and  Methods  of  Separating  the  Cleavage 

Products,  10  min Geo.  Spitzer,  Purdue  University 

Botany, 

4.  Plastids,  10  min.  (by  title) D.  M.  Mottier,  Indiana  University 

5.  Species  of  Martyniaceae,  5  min.. Flora  Anderson,  Indiana  University 

6.  Variation  and  Varieties  of  Zea  Mays,  10  min 

Paul  Weatherwax,  Indiana  University 

7.  Improved  Technique  for  the  Control  of  Pollination  in  Com,  10 

min Paul  Weatherwax,  Indiana  University 

8.  Dormant  Period  of  Timothy  Seed  after  Harvesting,  10  min 

M.  L.  Fisher,  Purdue  University 

9.  The  Plant  Succession  on  Niagrara  and  Hudson  River  Limestone, 

near  Richmond,  Ind.,  5  min.  (by  title) 

M.  S.  Markle,  Earlham  College 

10.  Notes  on  Microscopic  Technique,  5  min.  (by  title) 

M.S.  Markle,  Earlham  College 

11.  The  Ustilaginales  of  Indiana,  10  min 

H.  S.  Jackson,  Purdue  University 

12.  The  Uredinales  of  Indiana,  10  min H.  S.  Jackson 

13.  A  Suspected  Case  of  Live-Stock  Poisoning  by  Wild  Onion  (Al- 

lium Canadense) ,  10  min.   (by  title) 

F.  J.  Pipal,  Purdue  University 

14.  Additions  to  the  list  of  Plant  Diseases  of  Economic  Importance 

in  Indiana,  10  min.  (by  title) 

Geo.  A.  Osner,  Purdue  University 

15.  Reaction  of  Culture  Media,  10  min.  (by  title) 

H.  A.  Noyes,  Purdue  University 

16.  Studies  on  Pollen,  5  min F.  M.  Andrews,  Indiana  University 

17.  Stoppage  of  a  Sewer  Pipe  by  Roots  of  Acer  Saccharum,  5  min.. . 

F.  M.  Andrews,  Indiana  University 

18.  Anthocyanin  of  Beta  Vulgaris,  5  min 

F.  M.  Andrews,  Indiana  University 

19.  Improved  Forms  of  Maximow's  Automatic  Pipette,  5  min 

F.  M.  Andrews,  Indiana  University 

20.  The  Effect  of  Centrifugal  Force  on  Plants,  5  min • 

F.  M,  Andrews,  Indiana  University 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


52 

21.  The  Effect  of  Aeration  on  the  Roots  of  Zea  Mays,  5  min 

Colonzo  C.  Beals,  Indiana  University 

22.  Resistance  of  Mucor  Zygotes,  20  min 

Mildred  Nothnagel,  Indiana  Univerrity 

Chemistry. 

23.  The  Absorption  of  Iron  by  Platinum  Crucibles  in  Clay  Fusions, 

5  min W.  M.  Blanchard, 

DePauw    University;     Roscoe    Theibert,    DePauw    University 

24.  The  Injurious  Effect  of  Borax  in  Corn  Fertilizers,  10  min.  (by 

title) S.  D.  Conner,  Purdue    University 

25.  Chemical  Estimations  of  Fertility  in  Fulton  County  (Ind.)  Soils, 

15  min R.  H.  Carr  and  G.  A.  Cast,  Purdue  University 

26.  By-products  of  the  Preparation  of  Ether,  10  min.  (by  title) . . . 

P.  N.  Evans  and  G.  K.  Foresman,  Purdue  University 

27.  Quantitative  Precipitation  of  Manganese  as  the  Sulphide,  15 

min James  Brown,  Butler  College 

28.  The  Influence  of  Methyl  Iodide  Vapor  and  Tobacco  Smoke  on  the 

Growth  of  Certain  Bacteria  and  Fungi  (by  title) . .  C.  A.  Ludwig 

Geology, 

29.  Brief  Notes  on  the  New  Castle  Tornado,  10  min 

Colonzo  C.  Beals,  Indiana  University 

30.  "The  Mt.  Carmel  Fault,"  5  min W.  N.  Logan,  Indiana  University 

31.  "Some  Criteria  of  Dip,"  5  min W.  N.  Logan,  Indiana  University 

32.  "Possible  Utilization  of  Indiana  Kaolin,"  5  min 

W.  N.  Logan,  Indiana  University 

33.  "The  Physiographic  Divisions  of  the  United  States  as  made  by 

the  Fenneman  Committee,"  5  min 

F.  J.  Breeze,  Indiana  University 

34.  "Glacial  Boulders  in   Brown  and  Monroe  Counties,   South  of 

the   Limit   of   Glaciation,   15   min 

F.  J.  Breeze,  Indiana  University 

35.  "Field  Methods  in  the  Mid-Continental  Oil  Field,"  15  min 

. . . ; Louis  Roark,  Indiana  University 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


53 

Physics. 

36.  Energy  Loss  in  Commercial  Hammers,  15  min 

Edwin  Morrison  and  Robert  L.  Pelry,  Earlham  College 

37.  Some  Experiments  on  Resonance  of  Tubes  and  Horns,  5  min. . . 

Arthur  L.  Foley,  Indiana  University 

38.  Two  New  Photographic  Methods  of  Measuring  the  Speed  of 

Sound  Waves,  10  min Arthur  L.  Foley,  Indiana  University 

39.  Conditions  Affecting  the  Speed  of  Sound  Waves,  10  min 

Arthur  L.  Foley,  Indiana  University 

40.  The  Conduction  of  Heat  and  Electricity  Thru  Selenium,  10  min. 

Arthur  L.  Foley,  Indiana  University 

41.  Some  Observations  on  Fluorescence,  5  min 

Arthur  L.  Foley,  Indiana  University 

42.  Further  Notes  on  the  Identity  of  X-Rays  and  Light,  10  min.. . . 

Mason  E.  Hufford,  Indiana  University 

43.  An  improved  Form  of  High  Vacuum  High  Speed  Mercury  Vapor 

Air  Pump,  10  min Charles  T.  Knipp,  University  of  Illinois 

43a.  A  Possible  Standard  of  Sound .  Chas.  T.  Knipp,  University  of  Illinois 

44.  Visible  Color  Effects  in  a  Positive  Ray  Tube  Containing  Helium, 

10  min Chas.  T.  Knipp,  University  of  Illinois 

Zoology. 

45.  The  Effect  of  Artificial  Selection  upon  Bristle  Number  in  the 

Fruit  Fly  and  the  Interpretation  of  the  Results,  15  min. . . 
F.  Payne,  Indiana  University 

46.  The  Unionidas  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee,  20  min.  (by  title) 

....  Barton  Warren  Evermann,  California  Academy  of  Science ; 
Howard  Walton  Clark,  U.  S.  Biological  Station,  Fairport,  Iowa 

47.  A  Day  with  the  Birds  of  a  Hoosier  Swamp,  10  min.  (by  title) .  . . 

Barton  Warren  Evermann,  California  Academy  of  Science 

48.  Further  Experiments  with  the  New  Mutant,  Scarlet  in  the  Dro- 

sophila  Repleta,  10  min . .  ,^ H.  W.  Cromwell 

49.  A  Seasonal  Study  of  the  Stickleback  Kidney,  Cayuga  Jordan,  15 

min Walter  N.  Hess,  DePauw  University 

50.  On  the  Locus  of  the  Gene  for  the  Mutant,  Curved  (by  title) . . 

Roscoe  R.  Hyde,  Indiana  State  Normal 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


54 

51.  The  Erdmann  New  Culture  Medium  for  Protozoa,  20  min 

By  C.  A.  Beh- 

rens,  Purdue  University;  H.  C.  Travelbee,  Purdue  University 

52.  Disposition  and  Intelligence  of  the  Chimpanzee 

W.   Henry  Sheak,  Philadelphia,   Pa. 

53.  The  Uredinales  of  Delaware H.  S.  Jackson,  Purdue  University 

54.  The  Trees  of  White  County,  Indiana 

Louis  L.  Heimlich,  Purdue  University 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


55 

The  Physiography  of  Indianapolis. 


Charles  R.  Dryer,  Indiana  State  Normal  School. 


In  1820,  the  Indiana  Commissioners  fixed  upon  a  point  in  the  unin- 
habited wilderness,  "on  White  river  at  the  head  of  navigation"  and 
within  ten  miles  of  the  geographical  center  of  the  State  for  the  location 
of  the  future  capital.  Congress  had  granted  to  the  State  four  square 
miles  for  use  as  a  seat  of  government,  and  in  1821  a  plat  of  one  square 
mile  was  surveyed  which  now  comprises  the  official  and  commercial 
center  of  the  city.  The  area  was  situated  near  the  eastern  border  of  the 
flood  plain  of  White  River  and  a  few  feet  above  it,  but  was  traversed  by 
Pogues  Run,  a  small  tributary.  Fall  Creek,  a  much  larger  stream, 
entered  the  river  from  the  northeast  just  above  the  city  and  Pleasant 
Run  a  short  distance  below.  On  the  opposite  side  of  the  river.  Eagle 
Creek  came  in  from  the  west. 

The  present  metropolitan  district  would  be  enclosed  by  a  parallelo- 
gram 8  by  10  miles,  of  which  about  35  square  miles  are  built  up.  The 
underlying  bed  rocks  are  Devonian  limestones  and  shales  too  deeply 
buried  beneath  glacial  material  to  influence  topography.  The  Illinoian 
drift  sheet  of  compact  blue  clay,  varies  from  20  to  80  feet  in  thickness. 
A  few  feet  of  sand  and  gravel  separate  it  from  the  usual  bouldery  till  of 
Wisconsin  age,  the  whole  forming  a  mantle  70  to  170  feet  thick.  This 
glacial  subtratum  has  been  eroded  and  replaced  by  gravel  to  an  extent 
presently  to  be  described. 

In  the  absence  of  a  topographic  map  relief  can  be  described  only 
in  approximate  terms.  Central  Marion  County  is  crossed  from  north- 
west to  southeast  by  a  belt  of  undulating  drift  in  part  morainic  about 
ten  miles  wide,  its  surface  lying  about  800  feet  A.  T.  It  is  bordered  on 
the  south  by  massive  gravel  ridges  and  other  morainic  features.* 
Through  this  belt  nearly  at  right  angles.  White  River  and  Fall  Creek  cut 
a  trench  about  200  feet  deep,  having  its  bottom  on  or  near  bed  rock. 
During  the  period  of  glacial  retreat  this  trench  was  filled  half  full  of 
gravelly  outwash.    A  readvance  of  the  ice  margin,  accompanied  by  the 


•  Levorett,  Frank.    U.S.  Gcol.  Surv.  Monograph  LIII,  p.  96. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


56 


PHVSlC^t   MAP 

iNDiANAPOLlS 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


57 

escape  of  subglacial  streams,  deposited  near  the  western  border  of  the 
outwash  plain  a  belt  of  sand  and  gravel  hills  three  miles  long  and  rising 
in  the  sharp  knob  of  Crown  Hill  90  feet  above  the  plain  and  150  feet 
above  the  river.  White  River  passes  through  this  kame-moraine  in  a 
gorge  three  miles  long  and  half  a  mile  wide,  bordered  by  steep  bluffs 
40  to  80  feet  high.  The  gravel  plain  about  three  miles  wide  is  bounded 
on  the  east  by  a  gentle  rise  or  bluff  15  to  30  feet  high,  which  parallels 
Fall  Creek  and  touches  the  river  at  the  mouth  of  Pleasant  Run,  below 
which  the  plain  lies  on  the  west  side  of  the  river.  Its  surface  slopes  from 
about  740  feet  A.  T.  in  the  north  to  680  feet  in  the  south,  or  about  six 
feet  to  the  mile  and  is  cut  by  the  high  water  channels  of  the  river.  Fall 
Creek  and  Eagle  Creek,  into  a  series  of  low  but  well  defined  terraces.  The 
city  occupies  the  gravel  plain,  the  kame-moraine  and  the  gorge,  bluffs  and 
flood  plain  of  White  River,  and  extends  on  the  east  and  south  several 
miles  beyond  the  bluff  over  the  more  elevated  undulating  drift. 

The  physical  features  have  influenced  the  development  of  the  city, 
favorably  and  unfavorably,  in  various  ways.  White  River  is  a  commercial 
obstruction,  too  small  for  navigation,  inadequate  for  sewerage  and  en- 
tailing large  expense  for  bridges  and  levees.  It  pays  some  compensation 
in  water  supply  and  picturesque  sites  for  parks  and  residences.  The 
gravel  plain  makes  grading  and  excavation  inexpensive  and  surface 
drainage  rapid;  but  this  credit  account  is  balanced  by  a  debit  of  25,000 
wells  subject  to  serious  contamination.  Pogues  Run  has  cost  untold  sums 
in  damage  to  health  and  property  by  floods  and  the  expense  of  conversion 
into  a  covered  sewer,  but  furnishes  a  route  by  which  several  railroad 
lines  enter  the  city.  The  low  bluffs  and  terraces  of  Fall  Creek  and 
Pleasant  Run  are  utilized  for  boulevards  and  parkways.  The  Crown 
Hill  kame-moraine,  the  most  striking  and  attractive  natural  feature 
of  the  area,  is  admirably  suited  for  the  abode  of  the  living  or  the  dead 
and  forms  the  beautiful  site  of  Crown  Hill  Cemetery.  The  smooth  sur- 
face of  the  surrounding  drift  plain  is  a  prime  factor  in  the  accessibility 
which  makes  Indianapolis  the  largest  center  of  exclusively  land  trans- 
portation in  the  United  States. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


59 


The  Pygidiidae. 


Carl  H.  Eigenmann,  Indiana  University. 

There  is  a  widespread  belief  in  parts  of  South  America  that  a  fibh 
called  Candiru  has  the  vicious  habit  of  entering  the  urethra  of  bathers. 
Its  opercle  and  interopercle  bear  retrorse  spines  that  are  erectile.  The 
fishy  therefore,  cannot  be  withdrawn.  An  operation,  if  not  amputation.  Is 
necessary  to  get  rid  of  the  pest,  and  if  it  has  penetrated  to  the  bladder  it 
causes  death.  This  story  has  been  told  many  different  travelers.  Some 
have  rejected  it  as  beyond  belief,  others  have  added  to  the  marveloi^s, 
while  still  others  have  tried  to  identify  the  fish.  The  result  of  the  latter 
attempt  has  been  ludicrous  at  times,  inasmuch  as  the  identification  would 
require  the  reverse  of  the  well  recognized  principle  of  logic  that  the 
greater  cannot  enter  the  lesser.  Some  of  the  Candirus  reach  a  consid- 
erable size,  a  length  of  at  least  a  foot  and  a  thickness  of  at  least  two 
inches.    We  will  return  to  the  Candirds. 

I  have  finished  a  monograph  of  the  family  of  fishes,  the  Pygidiidae, 
of  which  the  smaller  Candirtis  are  members,  and  I  want  to  give  a  brief 
account  of  the  different  types  of  fishes  that  are  included  in  this  family. 
Other  species  of  the  family  have  well  authenticated  habits  as  remarkable 
as  those  of  the  Candiru,  and  I  am  figuring  all  the  species  I  can  get. 

I  find  that  there  are  nearly  a  hundred  well  defined  species  of  the 
Pygidiidae.  Many  of  these  are  very  rare.  Forty-four  are  known  from 
the  types  only,  several  have  been  recorded  from  but  two  localities.  The 
types  are  widely  scattered  in  the  museums  of  North  America,  South 
America,  and  Europe.  At  one  time  or  another  I  have  examined  prac- 
tically all  of  the  specimens  in  American  museums,  and  have  myself  dis- 
covered nine  of  the  nineteen  genera,  and  forty-three  of  the  ninety-seven 
species.  Eight  or  ten  of  the  types  are  in  Vienna,  two  are  in  Berlin, 
twelve  in  Paris,  eleven  in  London,  one  in  Torino,  two  probably  in  Mu- 
nich, one  in  Leipzig,  two  in  Copenhagen,  one  in  Berne,  three  presumably 
in  Santiago,  Chile,  three  in  Buenos  Aires,  three  in  Rio  de  Janeiro,  two  in 
Cordoba,  Argentine,  one  in  the  Field  Museum,  two  in  the  Philadelphia 


*  €k>ntribution  from  the  Zodlogical  Laboratory  of  Indiana  University,  No.  168. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


60 

Academy  of  Sciences,  eight  in  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  five 
in  Indiana  University,  one  in  Princeton  University,  twenty-four  in  the 
Carnegie  Museum.  The  type  of  one  species,  the  only  known  specimen 
of  the  species,  has  been  lost. 


-V       '^JJ^T.-^ 

Si^^^^ij^^^ 

■■■'. 

..E 

^ 

A  Pygidiuii}. 

~^^~ 

The  particular  type  of  catfish  underlying  all  of  the  Pygidiidae  is 
that  of  a  short  eel  with  a  little  barbel  on  the  anterior  nostril,  twin  bar- 
bels at  the  angle  of  the  mouth,  small  teeth  in  bands  in  the  jaws,  bunches 
of  spines  on  the  margin  of  the  preopercle  and  on  the  opercle,  the  first 
dorsal  and  pectoral  rays  not  spinous,  the  dorsal  placed  behind  the  middle 
of  the  body  and  not  followed  by  an  adipose  fin.  The  principal  peculi- 
arities are  the  twin  barbels  at  the  angle  of  the  mouth,  the  absence  of  an 
adipose  fin  and  the  development  of  opercular  and  interopercular  spines — 
never  mind  the  internal  economy.  Nobody  knows,  at  least  I  don't,  why 
there  are  ttvin  barbels  at  the  angle  of  the  mouth,  or  why  there  is  no 
adipose  fin.  It  is  easy  to  see  that  the  spines  on  interopercle  and  opercle 
are  important.  They  are  an  adaptation  to  the  insinuating  habit  and  pre- 
vent an  exsinuation  if  the  fish  objects  to  coming  out. 

From  this  basal  idea  of  the  Pygidiidae  have  been  developed  by  addi- 
tion, subtraction  and  modification  several  distinct  subfamilies,  each  with 
subsidiary  basal  ideas  and  a  larger  or  smaller  number  of  radiations. 
There  are  the  Nematogenyinse  with  barbels  on  the  chin,  remnants  really 
of  the  more  ancient,  less  specialized  cat-fishdom,  the  Pygidiidae  which 
are  the  least  specialized  of  the  Pygidiidae,  and  meander  over  all  the 
mountains  of  South  America,  both  east  and  west.  The  most  that  can  be 
said  of  them  is  that  there  are  a  lot  of  them  and  that  when  big  enough 
they  are  good  to  eat.  Then  there  are  the  Stegophilinae  with  a  broad, 
inferior  mouth  with  innumerable  fine  teeth  in  many  rows  on  lips  and 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


61 

jaws,  and  some,  at  least,  which  have  exaggerated  the  insinuating  habit 
to  the  extent  of  becoming  parasites  in  the  gills  of  other  fishes.  Also 
there  are  the  Vandelliinie,  in  which  the  lower  jaws  are  weak,  the  rami 
no  longer  meeting  in  the  middle,  the  teeth  largely  reduced  to  a  few 
pointed  ones  in  the  middle  of  the  upper  jaw,  with  which  they  make 
abrasions  in  the  skins  of  other  fishes  and  of  an  occasional  bather,  to 
drink  his  blood.  To  this  crowd  of  disreputables  belong  the  aforemen- 
tioned Candiru.  Finally  there  are  little  odds  and  ends  tied  into  the 
Tridentinae,  minute  creatures,  the  smallest  of  which  is  but  17  mm.  long, 
and  the  largest  but  27  mm.  The  most  that  we  can  say  of  them  is 
to  express  the  wonder  that  any  of  them  were  caught  at  all. 

The  Nematogenyinae  have  either  lost  or  never  got  opercular  spines. 
Nematogenys  is  large  enough  to  be  noticed.  It  has  received  the  common 
name  "Bagre",  and  reaches  a  length  of  over  ten  inches  at  least. 

The  Pygidiinae  flourish  in  the  mountains  from  southern  Panama  to 
southern  Patagonia,  and  in  southeastern  Brazil,  also  in  the  cataracts  of 
Guiana.  A  few  of  them  are  found  in  the  lowland,  but  their  optimum  is 
only  reached  in  high  altitudes,  and  with  Astroblepus,  a  representative  of 
another  catfish  type,  they  reach  the  highest  altitudes  attained  by  fishes 
in  South  America. 

One  of  them,  Eremophilus  mutisii,  is  exceedingly  abundant  on  the 
Plains  of  Bogota,  where  its  name,  "El  Capitan",  expresses  the  estimation 
in  which  this  Pygidiid  is  held.  It  has  the  habit  of  worming  its  way 
into  the  mud  and  into  the  banks  of  streams  and  lakes.  "El  Capitan"  is 
speckled  like  a  lake  trout,  and  it  is  all  but  confined  to  the  elevated  basin 
in  which  Bogota  is  situated.  In  the  mountain  brooks  of  Colombia  many 
species  of  the  genus  Pygidium  are  found  in  abundance.  I  recall  one 
sultry  day  sitting  in  a  cool,  clear,  shallow  brook  near  Honda,  Colombia, 
leisurely  raking  my  fingers  through  the  sand  and  pebbles  on  the  bottom. 
Minute  fishes  darted  out  of  the  sand  and  into  it  and  under  small  rocks. 
I  lined  a  dipnet  with  cheese-cloth  and  wfent  for  them,  dipping  up  sand, 
gravel  and  all.  I  soon  had  a  good  number,  eighty-nine  to  be  exact,  of  a 
new  species  of  the  genus  Pygidium.  Mr.  E.  B.  Williamson  caught  a 
specimen  of  another  species,  which  was  making  its  way  up  the  vertical 
wall  of  a  waterfall.  The  sixty- three  members  of  the  genus  Pygidium 
range  from  southern  Panama  to  Chile,  Guiana  and  Rio  Grande  do  Sul. 
Very  few  species  are  known  from  the  lowlands,  but  every  mountain 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


62 

brook  has  one  or  more  species,  never  many,  and  none  of  them  have  a 
wide  distribution.  They  are  abundant  in  Lake  Titicaca,  and  in  south- 
em  Chile  are  replaced  by  the  related  genus  Hatcheria. 

A  halfway  station  between  the  Pygidiin®  with  nasal  barbel,  free 
gill-membranes  and  ordinary  fish  mouth  and  the  small  commensals,  par- 
asites and  disreputables  without  nasal  barbels,  with  narrow  gill-openins:s 
and  inferior  mouth,  is  found  in  Pareiodon.  In  shape  and  size  Pareiodon 
resembles  the  Havanas  sold  to  tourists  in  Habana  for  a  dollar,  each  one 
put  up  in  an  individual  bottle,  a  corkscrew  furnished  gratis  with  each 
cigar. 

Some,  at  least,  of  the  Stegophilini  live  in  the  gill-openings  of  other 
fishes.  The  head  in  the  species  of  this  group  is  flat  below,  the  mouth  a 
transverse  slit,  the  teeth  are  minute  and  numerous,  there  is  no  nasal  bar- 
bel, the  gill-opening  is  greatly  restricted,  the  membrane  being  united 
with  the  broad,  flat  isthmus.  Some  of  them  roam  the  billows  free  as 
cats,  others  are  known  to  live,  occasionally  at  least,  as  commensals  or 
parasites  in  the  gill-cavities  of  other  fishes.  Reinhardt,  a  Danish  natur- 
alist living  for  the  time  at  Lagoa  Santa,  on  the  Rio  das  Velhas,  a  trib- 
utary of  the  San  Francisco,  was  the  first  one  to  note  this  fact  and  to 
secure  specimens.  Reinhardt  being  told  that  one  of  the  giant  catfishes, 
Pseudoplaty stoma  eoruscans,  carried  its  young  in  its  gills,  offered  a  re- 


Stegophiluit  insidionufi  Hcinhnrt. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


63 

ward  for  one  with  young.  Two  Platystomas  were  brought  with  young, 
but  instead  of  being  the  young  of  the  giant  catfish,  he  found  that  the 
small  fishes  were  the  types  of  a  distinct  parasitic  or  commensal  fish, 
which  he  called  "Stegophilus  insidiosus." 

It  is  certain  that  some  members  of  the  Stegophilini  live  in  the  open, 
very  probably  on  sandy  beaches;  in  fact,  while  but  one  species  is  known 
to  live  part  of  its  time,  at  least,  in  the  gills  of  other  fishes  there  are  a 
number  of  species  that  have  only  been  caught  in  the  open.  Several  years 
ago  Prof.  J.  D.  Anisits,  then  living  in  Asuncion,  Paraguay,  sent  me  one 
of  these  little  creatures,  which  he  had  caught  in  a  brook  near  Sapucay. 
He  tried  to  get  others  but  sorrowfully  reported  that  the  locality  was 
gone,  the  arroyo  was  dry.  While  the  original  member  of  the  Stego- 
philini came  from  a  medium  altitude,  the  members  of  the  subfamily  live 
largely  in  the  lower  levels  of  the  Amazon  and  La  Plata.  As  it  is  more 
probable  that  specimens  living  in  the  open  will  get  into  the  ichthyologists' 
bottles  than  those  living  in  the  gill-cavities  of  larger  fishes,  it  must  be 
left  an  open  question  whether  the  species  living  in  gill-cavities  are  more 
numerous  than  those  living  in  the  open,  and  whether  the  same  species 
live  in  the  open  and  in  gill-cavities  indiscriminately,  or  whether  they 
only  occasionally  get  into  gill-cavities  as  the  result  of  their  inborn,  in- 
sinuating habit  coupled  with  the  blood-sucking  specialization. 

The  three  known  species  of  the  Tridentin®,  all  collected  during  the 
Thayer  Expedition,  in  the  Amazon  Basin  near  the  boundary  between 
Brazil  and  Peru,  were  described  by  my  wife  and  myself  in  1898.  One  of 
them,  Miuroglanis  platycephalusj  captured  in  1866  by  the  combined 
efforts  of  James,  Thayer  and  Talisman,  in  the  Jutahy,  is  or  was  only 
seventeen  millimeters  long.  A  recent  effort  to  locate  the  specimen  has 
failed.  The  same  fate  seems  to  have  befallen  the  specimen  of  Tridens 
brevis.  It  was  but  twenty-one  millimeters  long,  and  caught  in  1866  by 
Bourget  at  Tabatinga.  The  third  and  last  of  this  group  is  Tridens 
melanops.  In  1866  the  future  philosopher,  William  James,  caught  twen- 
ty-seven of  them  at  Iga,  the  largest  only  twenty-seven  millimeters  long. 
In  1891  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology  sent  me  one  of  these,  which 
has  just  been  figured  for  my  monograph.  The  Tridentinse  are  fishes 
with  a  greatly  depressed  head  and  a  large  eye  placed  on  the  edge  of  the 
head;  in  one,  at  least,  they  look  down  rather  than  up. 

One  of  the  Vandelliini,  Branchioica  bertcni,  lives  in  the  gill-cavities 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


64 

of  a  large  Characin.  Several  years  ago  Mr.  Bertoni  sent  me  one  of  these, 
and  it  seems  that  I  at  once  described  it  with  much  gusto.  Later  Mr. 
Bertoni  sent  me  another  lot  of  minute  fishes,  and  this  summer  I  discov- 
ered that  two  of  these  were  taken  from  the  gills  of  a  Characin.  I  ag^ain 
described  them,  of  course,  as  a  new  genus  and  species.  Still  later  I 
found  the  totally  forgotten  original  specimen  and  description  carefully 
laid  away. 

Ribeiro,  of  the  National  Museum  of  Rio  de  Janeiro,  caught  another 
very  similar  member  of  a  related  genus,  Paravandellia,  among  the  weeds 
of  the  stream  near  San  Louis  de  Caceres  in  the  upper  Paraguay  Basin. 

With  fishes  as  rare  as  these  and  as  small  as  these,  the  question  some- 
times arises  whether  the  differences  are  due  to  the  fact  that  one  worker 
uses  a  hand  lens  and  the  other  a  binocular  dissecting  microscope  with 
an  arc  spotlight.  The  results  of  the  two  instruments  are  comparable 
to  the  effects  produced  by  an  old-fashioned  cannon  and  a  modern  forty- 
two-centimeter  howitzer. 

Two  species  I  have  just  described  with  the  three  previously  known, 
brings  the  number  of  Vandellias  up  to  five — maybe.  I  used  a  howitzer, 
and  my  distinguished  predecessors,  Pellegrin,  Castelnau,  Valenciennes 
and  Cuvier  used  hand  lenses.  The  Vandellias  are  long,  slender,  eel-like 
in  shape.  There  are  really  two  genera  in  the  genus  Vandellia,  but  I 
don't  yet  know  which  one  of  these  Valenciennes  had  when  he  named 
the  genus.  The  other  is,  for  the  present,  without  a  legitimate  name. 
When  we  know  which  one  can  legitimately  lay  claim  to  the  name  Van- 
dellia the  other  one  can  be  baptized  as  Urinophilus.  One  of  these,  pos- 
sibly two  of  them  if  they  are  different,  Vandellia  ka^emani  and  Vandellia 
tvieneri,  is  or  are  too  large  to  enter  the  urethra  of  man  when  it  is  or  they 
are  fully  grown.  On  the  other  hand,  Vandellia  cii^hosa,  sanguinea,  and 
plazai  could,  as  far  as  their  size  is  concerned,  enter  the  urethra.  Do 
they? 

Pellegrin,  who  has  written  on  this  subject,  quotes  Dr.  Jobert  who 
collected  fishes  in  Brazil  for  the  Jardin  des  Plantes.  Jobert  tells  that 
a  highly  reputable  physician  of  Belem,  Para,  Dr.  Castro,  told  him  he  had 
taken  a  Candiru  from  the  urethra  of  a  negress. 

Boulenger  (Proc.  Zool.  Soc.  London,  1897,  p.  901)  says  of  Van- 
dellia cirrhosa: 

"The  'Candiru*,  as  the  fish  is  called,  is  much  dreaded  by  the  natives 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


65 

of  the  Jurua  district,  who,  in  order  to  protect  themselves,  rarely  enter 
the  river  without  covering  the  genitalia  by  means  of  a  sheath  formed  of 
a  cocoanut-shell,  with  a  minute  perforation  to  let  out  urine,  maintained 
in  a  sort  of  bag  of  palm-fibers  suspended  from  a  belt  of  the  same  mate- 
rial. The  fish  is  attracted  by  the  urine,  and  when  once  it  has  made  its 
way  into  the  urethra,  cannot  be  pulled  out  again  owing  to  the  spines 
which  arm  its  opercles.  The  only  means  of  preventing  it  from  reach- 
ing the  bladder,  where  it  causes  inflammation  and  ultimately  death,  is  to 
instantly  amputate  the  penis;  and  at  Tres  Unidos,  Dr.  Bach  had  actually 
examined  a  man  and  three  boys  with  amputated  penis  as  a  result  of  this 
dreadful  accident.  Dr.  Bach  was  therefore  satisfied  that  the  account 
given  of  this  extraordinary  habit  of  the  'Candiru'  is  perfectly  trust- 
worthy. Mr.  Boulenger  further  showed  a  photograph,  taken  by  Dr.  Bach, 
•f  two  nude  Indians  wearing  the  protective  purse." 

It  is  to  be  noted  here  that,  while  this  evidence  is  quite  circumstantial, 
it  is  only  circumstantial.  Dr.  Bach  did  not  himself  operate  or  help  to 
operate  or  remove  the  Candiru,  and  a  much  simpler  operation  than 
amputation  would  have  been  suflicient  to  remove  it. 

Pellegrin  (Bull.  Soc.  Philom.  de  Paris,  (11),  I,  1909,  pp.  5-8)  further 
quoting  Jobert's  account,  says  that  at  Para  there  are  two  species  of 
Candirtis,  only  one  of  which  penetrates  the  urethra,  the  other,  the  horse 
Candiru,  attaches  itself  to  any  part  of  the  body  and  also  attacks  horses. 
Dr.  Jobert  himself,  who  went  in  bathing  near  Para,  was  attacked  within 
less  than  five  minutes  and  found  scratches  in  a  group  five  to  six  inches 
long  and  a  centimeter  or  more  wide.  He  did  not  secure  the  creature 
which  attacked  him. 

In  "Die  Natur",  XIX,  p.  180,  Muller,  in  reporting  on  the  travels  of 
Gustav  Wallis,  says  that  Wallis  noted  a  fish  in  the  Huallaga  called  the 
Candiru,  which  is  as  much  feared  in  the  water  as  mosquitoes  and  ants  on 
land.  This  Candiru  attaches  to  any  portion  of  the  body  like  a  leech  and 
spreads  retrorse  hooks  in  the  wound  so  that  it  is  only  with  considerable 
pain  that  it  can  be  removed.  It  prefers  the  most  secret  parts  of  the 
body  and  it  was  reported  to  him  that  the  consequent  operation  some- 
times causes  death.  One  specimen  of  this  Candiru  was  given  to  Leukart 
and  by  him  to  Liitken,  who  described  it  as  Acanthopoma  annectens.  It 
probably  belongs  to  the  Stegophilini. 

That  a  fish,  or  several  species  of  fishes,  found  in  the  Amazon  Valley 

ft— 11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


66 

and  called  Candiru  is  or  are  a  nuisance  is  certain.  Whether  the  widely 
distributed  belief  that  the  Candirus  are  tropic  to  urine  and  consequently 
have  a  tendency  to  enter  the  urethra,  or  whether  the  candiru's  tendency 
to  burrow  leads  them  accidentally  to  enter  the  urethra  are  all  matters 
that  must,  for  the  present,  remain  in  debate.  A  very  interesting  sub- 
sidiary question  is  whether,  if  Candirus  are  tropic  to  urine,  they  do  not 
also  enter  the  urethra  of  aquatic  mammals  and  large  fishes.  Further 
study  may  demonstrate  that  some  species  of  Candirus  have  become  para- 
sitic in  the  bladder  of  large  fishes  and  aquatic  mammals.  These  are  all 
questions  that  may  legitimately  be  taken  up  by  the  expeditions  that  wiU, 
I  hope,  result  from  this  article. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


67 
An  Epidemic  Among  the  Fishes  of  Huffman's  Lake. 

Will  Scott,  Indiana  University. 

This  paper  describes  an  epidemic  among  the  fishes  in  Huffman's 
lake  during  October  and  Norember,  1917.  The  data  indicate  that  these 
fish  died  from  poison  which  was  derived  from  a  blue-green  algae,  either 
by  its  metabolism  or  decay. 

Huffman's  lake  is  located  in  Kosciusko  County,  Indiana,  (Tp.  33  N., 
R.  5  E.)  about  one  mile  northwest  of  Atwood.  It  is  just  west  of  thfe 
Erie-Saginaw  interlobate  moraine  and  lies  in  a  slight  depression  of  the 
ground  moraine.  It  is  roughly  oval  in  outline.  Its  greatest  length  is 
about  one  mile  and  its  greatest  width  is  about  one-half  mile.  Its  longi- 
tudinal axis  extends  north  and  south.  Near  the  middle  of  the  lake  there 
are  three  small  islets  situated  along  the  major  axis  of  the  lake.  •  Its 
maximum  depth  is  9.8  meters. 

The  land  surrounding  the  lake  is  low.  Much  of  it  near  the  shore  is 
marshy.  To  the  east,  a  short  distance,  the  rougher  topography  of  the 
interlobate  moraine  begins.  The  lake  is  therefore  quite  exposed  to  the 
action  of  the  wind  especially  to  the  south,  west,  and  north. 

Dead  and  dying  fish  were  first  noted  in  large  numbers  after  a  storm 
that  occurred  on  October  29th.  This  storm  left  a  distinct  wave  deposit, 
some  distance  above  the  normal  lake  level.  On  November  16  the  fish 
were  counted  in  several  sections  of  this  deposit.  The  average  was  about 
one  fish  per  lineal  foot  of  deposit.  Six  species  were  collected  and  iden- 
tified, bluegill,  (Lepomis  pallidis  Mitchill) ;  large  mouthed  black  bass 
(Micropterus  salmoides  Lac^p^de) ;  calico  bass  (Pomoxis  sparoides  Ra- 
finesque) ;  sucker  (Catostomus  commersonii  Lac^pede) ;  hickory  shad 
(Dorosoma  cepedianum  Le  Sueur),  and  yellow  perch  (Perca  flavescens 
MitchiU). 

One  hickory  shad  was  identified  struggling  on  its  side  near  the 
center  of  the  lake.  It  was  able  to  avoid  a  dipnet  and  escape.  Near  the 
shore,  two  rock  bass  and  five  bluegills  were  taken  swimming  slowly  on 


*  I  am  under  oblii;ration  to  Mr.  Chauncy  Juday  for  identifyinjc  the  alfira,  to  Mr.  J.  H. 
Arminffton  for  the  Winona  Lake  temperatures,  and  to  Mr.  S.  L.  Blue  who  made 
the  field  work  possible. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


68 

their  sides.    Several  small  bluegills,  that  were  still  alive,  were  picked  up 
stranded  at  the  edge  of  the  water. 

Nothing  is  known  of  the  summer  conditions  of  this  lake.  The 
autumnal  overturn  in  Eagle  Lake  (Winona)  takes  place  the  latter  part 
of  November.  It  seemed  possible  that  there  might  be  a  deficiency  in 
oxygen  in  the  lower  levels  of  the  lake  that  was  killing  the  fish  as  their 
actions  simulated  those  of  fish  suffering  from  dyspnea. 

An  examination  of  the  water  for  dissolved  gases  and  carbonates 
demonstrated  that  the  lake  is  a  hard  water  lake  and  that  there  was  an 
abundance  of  oxygen.  (See  table.  4cc.  O.  per  liter.  Temperature  6°C.) 
The  fall  overturn  had  taken  place  but  the  water  was  only  about  half  sat- 
urated. It  is  barely  possible  that  the  first  fish  to  die  may  have  died 
from  dyspnea,  although  this  is  not  likely  on  account  of  the  shallowness 
of  the  lake,  the  contour  of  its  bottom,  and  its  exposure  to  the  wind.  It  is 
certain  that  the  fish  that  were  dying  in  November  were  not  suffering 

from  the  lack  of  oxygen. 

• 

TABLE  OF  TEMPERATURES  AND  DISSOLVED  GASES. 


T. 

O. 

7v  Sat. 

CO, 

Cb. 

Surface 

2M 

Bottom 

6.9 
6  9 
6.9 

4.09 
4.06 

49% 

1.51 
1  26 

42.72 
42.72 

Air  temperature  10°C. 

Secchi'g  disc  reading  .9  M. 

Gases  expressed  in  cc.  per  liter.    Cb.  is  COi,  as  carbonate. 

The  fish  were  examined  very  carefully  for  infections,  sporozoan  and 
bacterial,  but  the  tissues  showed  no  lesions  or  postules.  The  anus,  nares, 
mouth,  and  gills  were  examined  with  especial  care.  There  was  no  indica- 
tion of  gas  disease. 

It  has  been  suggested  that  the  lake  might  have  been  dynamited. 
There  were  no  ruptured  blood-vessels  to  indicate  that  the  fish  had  suffered 
from  concussion.  Moreover,  the  fish  were  dying  during  a  period  of  more 
than  six  weeks,  a  fact  that  would  preclude  their  having  been  killed  by  a 
single  charge  of  explosive. 

The  only  prenomenon  that  could  be  associated  with  the  death  of  the 
fishes  as  a  causal  factor  was  a  tremendous  growth  of  blue  green  alga 
Oscillatoria   prolifica    (Grenville)    Dumont.     This   alga   occurred   near 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


69 

the  surface  of  the  lake  in  enormous  quantities.  It  was  difficult  to  make 
a  quantitative  estimate  of  it  by  the  ordinary  limnological  methods  on  ac- 
count of  the  wind  drifting  it.  Some  notion  of  its  abundance  may  be 
gained  from  the  following  observations: 

At  10:00  a.m.  there  was  still  a  very  heavy  fog  on  the  lake.  When 
rowing  to  the  center  of  the  lake  the  water  appeared  pink  when  disturbed 
by  the  oars,  and  in  the  wake  of  the  boat.  By  3:00  p.m.  a  slight  breeze 
had  drifted  the  algae  in  a  solid  scum  along  the  east  side  of  the  lake. 
In  the  bays  this  scum  reached  a  thickness  of  4-6  mm.  The  alga  when 
concentrated  in  this  scum  had  a  rather  dark  brick-red  appearance. 

That  the  alga  caused  the  destruction  of  the  fish  is  probable  on  ac- 
count of  two  facts.  First,  it  is  the  only  associated  extraordinary  phe- 
nomenon. This  is  of  course  only  presumptive.  Second,  certain  blue- 
green  algae  (cyanophycae)  seem  to  produce  substances,  either  by  their 
metabolism  or  decay,  which  when  concentrated  are  toxic  to  vertebrates, 
and  may  even  cause  death. 

Arthur  ('83)  reports  two  instances  in  which  cattle  were  poisoned  by 
drinking  water  that  was  covered  with  a  thick  scum  of  blue-green  alga 
(Rivularia  fluitans  Cohn). 

Nelson  (*03)  after  discussing  the  cyanophycae  that  cause  "water 
bloom"  closes  with  these  words :  "In  several  instances  it  has  been  almost 
conclusively  proved  that  the  presence  of  one  or  more  of  these  species  in 
drinking  water  used  by  stock  has  caused  fatal  results." 

Cause  of  the  Excessive  Growth  of  Augje. 

This  lake  has  been  under  the  observation  of  Mr.  Maurice  Miller  for 
thirty-two  years.  He  reports  that  this  autumn  (1917)  is  the  first  time 
that  a  red  scum  has  appeared. 

Olive  ('05)  identified  this  algae  from  the  ice  in  Pine  Lake  (Wiscon- 
sin), where  there  evidently  had  been  a  considerable  growth  just  before 
the  lake  froze. 

Red  pigment  is  very  characteristic  of  the  plankton  of  arctic  and 
alpine  regions  (Steuer  1910,  pp.  277-8).  The  red  coloration  of  lakes  and 
ponds  in  the  Swiss  Alps  seems  to  be  a  rather  common  phenomenon. 

Brunn  ('80)  reports  the  ice  on  Lake  Neuchatel  being  colored  red 
with  a  growth  of  Pleurococcus  palustris  Kiintzig.    He  also  refers  to  the 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


70 

freezing  of  Lake  Moral  in  1825  in  which  the  ice  was  colored  by  Oscilla- 
toria  rufescens. 

Klausener   ('08)   made  a  study  of  the  so-called  "Blutseen"  of  the 
High  Alps.    Most  of  these  were  colored  by  Euglena  sanguinea  Ehr. 

TABLE  SHOWING  THE  MEAN  TEMPERATURES  FOR  OCTOBER     AND     NOVEMBER. 
DURING  THE  DECENNIUM  1908-1917. 

Station:    Winona    Lake,    ten    milea  from    Huffman's    Lake. 


Year. 

October. 

November. 

1908 

54.6 

42.1 

1909 

49.6 

48.4 

1910 

57.2 

35.8 

1911 

53.0 

36.2 

1912 

54.8 

41  4 

1913 

53.4 

45  7 

1914 

56.7 

41.9 

1915 

54.0 

42.8 

1916 

53  0 

41.4 

1917 

44  0 

39.0 

Mean 

53.0 

41.5 

The  appended  table  of  temperatures*  indicates  that  the  mean  for 
October,  1917,  was  5.6  degrees  F.  lower  than  for  any  other  October  in 
the  ten  years  preceding,  and  9  degrees  F.  colder  than  the  mean  for  this 
decennium.  This  means  that  the  lake  was  cooled  early  in  the  autumn 
and  remained  at  a  rather  low  temperature  for  six  to  eight  weeks  instead 
of  the  normal,  much  shorter,  period.  That  is,  arctic  conditions  main- 
tained in  this  lake  for  nearly  two  months.  This  is,  I  think,  one  of  the 
factors  that  caused  this  alga  to  develop  so  luxuriantly. 

Against  this  view,  are  the  observations  of  Hyams  and  Richards  ('01, 
'02,  '04),  and  others  on  O.  prolifica  in  Jamaica  Pond.  Here  the  max- 
ima occurred  in  the  warmer  months,  although  a  dense  growth  often  de- 
veloped just  before  the  ice  formed. 

In  the  present  state  of  our  knowledge  it  is  impossible  to  harmonize 
these  observations  with  those  on  the  so-called  "blood  lakes"  of  the  Alps, 
those  of  Olive  (loc.  cit.)  and  the  ones  here  presentd  on  Huffman's  lake. 

Brunn  ('80)  suggests  the  presence  of  iron  compounds  as  one  of  the 
conditions  for  the  development  of  red  pigment  in  the  blue-green  algae. 
This  condition  is  satisfied  by  the  large  amounts  of  iron  oxide  in  the  afflu- 
ent springs  at  its  margin. 


•These  tempernturcs  are  for  the  Winona  Lake  Station,  which  is  about  10  miles  east  of  Huff 
man's  Lake. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


71 


Remaining  Problems. 


It  remains  to  be  determined  experimentally  whether  or  not  this  alga 
produces  a  toxin,  the  nature  of  the  toxin,  the  action  of  the  toxin  on 
fishes,  etc. 

A  much  more  difficult  problem  is  to  determine  the  exact  condition 
under  which  this  alga  will  develop.  If  this  alga  reappears  this  problem 
will  be  attacked. 

Literature  Cited. 

Arthur,  J.  C,  '83.     Some  algae  of  Minnesota  supposed  to  be  poisonous. 

Bull  Minn.  Acad.  Nat.  Sci.,  Vol.  2,  pp.  1-12. 
Brun,  M.  J.,  '80,  L'eau  rouge  du  lac  de  Neuchatel.    Archiv.  d.  Sci.  phys. 

et  nat.,  T.  3,  p.  337. 
Hyams,  Isabel  F.  and  Richards,  Ellen  H.,  '01.     Notes  on  Oscillatoria 

prolifica  (Grenville).    I.    Life  History.    Tech.  Quart.,  Vol.  14.    No. 

4,  pp.  302-310. 

'02,  II.     Chemical  composition.     Ibid,  Vol.  15,  pp.  308-315. 

'04,  III.    Coloring  matter.    Ibid,  Vol.  17,  pp.  270-276. 
Klausener,  Carl,  '08.    Die  Blutseen  d.  Hochalpen.  Int.  Rev.  d.  Hydrog.  u. 

Hydrob.  B.I,  ss.  359-424. 
Nelson,  N.  P.  B.,  '03.     Observations  on  some  algae  that  cause  "water 

bloom."    Minn.  Bot.  Stud,  3rd.  Ser.,  Pt.  1,  pp.  51-56. 
Olive,   E.   W.,   *05.     Notes  on  the  occurrence  of  Oscillatoria  prolifica 

(Grenville)    Gomont  in  the  ice  of  Pine  Lake,  Waukesha  County, 

Wisconsin.  Wis.  Acad.  Sci.,  Art.  and  Letters,  Vol.  XV,  pp.  124-134. 
Steuer,  A.,  '10.    Planktonkunde  s.  277-8.    Leipzig. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


73 


Germinal  Changes  in  the  Bar-Eyed  Race  of  Drosophila 
During  the  Course  op  Selection  por  Facet  Number.* 


Charles  Zeleny,  University  of  Illinois. 


In  recent  discussions  two  explanations  of  the  effect  of  selection  have 
been  offered.  According  to  the  first  of  these  the  results  obtained  are  due 
merely  to  a  sorting  out  of  differences  existing  in  the  stock  at  the  begin- 
ning of  selection.  According  to  the  second,  new  germinal  differences 
arise  during  the  course  of  selection. 

Among  those  who  admit  the  continued  production  of  new  germinal 
differences  there  is  a  disagreement  as  to  the  manner  in  which  the  ger- 
minal changes  occur.  Some  hold  the  view  that  the  changes  consist  wholly 
of  the  production  of  new  unit  factors  or  genes.  Others  on  the  contrary 
believe  that  gradual  change  in  the  original  genes  is  the  principal  mode 
of  action  and  even  that  selection  itself  is  an  efficient  determiner  of  the 
direction  of  such  variation. 

It  is  my  intention  to  mention  briefly  some  of  the  results  bearing  on 
this  problem  which  have  been  obtained  in  the  course  of  selection  for 
facet  number  in  the  bar-eyed  race  of  Drosophila  ampelophila. 

Bar-eye  appeared  in  1913  as  a  single  mutant  male  in  a  full-eyed 
stock.  This  male  gave  rise  to  the  bar-eyed  stock  in  which  the  faceted 
region  of  the  eye  is  bar  shaped  and  the  facet  number  is  reduced  from 
one  thousand  or  more  to  about  one  hundred.  An  analysis  of  the  hered- 
itary behavior  of  bar-eye  shows  that  it  differs  from  full-eye  in  a  single 
sex-linked  genetic  factor  which  acts  as  an  incomplete  dominant,  the  het- 
erozygous condition  being  intermediate  between  bar  and  full-eye.  My 
stock  was  obtained  from  Professor  T.  H.  Morgan  in  January,  1914,  and 
since  that  time  experiments  on  selection  for  high-facet  and  for  low-facet 
number  have  been  in  progress,  but  not  in  a  continuous  series  because  of 
loss  of  the  lines  on  several  occasions.  In  these  experiments  it  has  been 
shown  that  selection  for  low-facet  and  for  high- facet  number  is  effective, 
and  low-bar,  high-bar,  emarginate  eye  and  full  eye  have  been  produced 


♦Contributions  from  the  Zoological  Laboratory  of  the  University  of  Illinois.  No.  110. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


74 

from  bar-eye.    The  analysis  of  the  factors  involved  has  yielded  the  fol- 
lowing results: 

1.  Grerminal  diversity  was  present  in  the  stock  at  the  beginning  of 
selection. 

2.  This  germinal  diversity  was  due  to  accessory  unit  factors  or 
genes  and  not  to  differences  in  the  bar-gene. 

3.  New  accessory  genes  producing  somatic  differences  of  small  de- 
gree have  appeared  during  the  course  of  selection.  Some  of  these  are 
located  in  the  autosomes. 

4.  New  accessory  genes  producing  somatic  differences  of  marked 
degree  have  also  appeared  during  the  course  of  selection.  These  also  are 
autosomal. 

5.  Reverse  mutation  in  the  bar  gene  causing  a  return  to  the  original 
full-eye  both  somatically  and  genetically  was  observed  several  times. 

Original  Germinal  Diversity. 
That  germinal  diversity  was  present  at  the  beginning  of  the  experi- 
ments is  indicated  by  the  pronounced  effect  of  the  early  selections. 
Crosses  between  the  high  selected  lines  and  the  low  selected  lines  show 
that  the  factors  causing  the  difference  are  not  sex-linked  as  is  the  main 
bar  factor.  This  absence  of  sex-linkage  shows  that  the  difference  be- 
tween high  and  low  lines  can  not  be  due  to  original  diversity  in  the  bar 
gene  nor  to  accessory  factors  originally  present  in  the  sex  chromosomes. 
The  factors  involved  must  be  in  the  autosomes.  Such  differences  in  auto- 
somal factors  might  have  been  present  in  the  parental  full-eyed  stock 
from  which  the  bar  was  derived.  They  would  then  have  been  trans- 
ferred to  the  bar-eyed  stock  at  the  time  of  its  formation,  which  involved 
not  only  change  in  the  bar  gene  in  a  single  male  but  also  the  crossing 
back  with  a  full-eyed  female  to  produce  the  bar-eyed  stock. 

Germinal  Changes  of  Small  Degree. 
That  the  original  diversity  is  not  a  sufficient  explanation  of  the 
effectiveness  of  selection  and  that  germinal  changes  continued  to  occur 
during  the  progress  of  selection  in  some  of  the  lines  is  indicated  by  the 
continued  effect  of  selection  in  these  lines  for  many  generations.  It  is 
highly  improbable  that  a  sustained  effectiveness  of  this  kind  could  have 
lasted  for  twelve  generations,  as  in  line  V,  merely  as  a  result  of  the  con- 
tinued sorting  out  of  an  original  diversity  without  additions  to  the  diver- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


75 

sity  due  to  the  formation  of  new  genes  or  change  in  old  ones.  After 
such  long  continued  and  still  effective  selection  reciprocal  crosses  between 
high  and  low  lines  still  give  no  indication  of  sex-linkage.  The  germinal 
changes  of  small  degree  which  must  be  assumed  to  explain  such  a  long 
continued  effect  of  selection  therefore  are  not  changes  in  the  bar  gene 
nor  are  they  due  to  new  accessory  genes  occurring  in  the  sex  chromosome. 
New  genes  must  have  arisen  in  the  autosomes.  Experiments  are  under 
way  to  determine  their  chromosomal  loci  more  definitely. 

Germinal  Changes  of  Marked  Degree. 

In  the  high  facet  selection  line  marked  mutations  have  occurred 
which  have  yielded  full-eyed  individuals  indistinguishable  from  the  wild 
ones  which  originally  mutated  to  form  the  bar  stock.  These  new  full- 
eyed  flies  are  genetically  of  two  distinct  types.  One  type  is  the  result 
of  a  reverse  mutation  involving  the  return  of  the  bar  gene  to  the  orig- 
inal full-eye-producing  condition.  Its  hereditary  behavior  is  similar  to 
that  of  the  wild  Drosophila  in  all  the  tests  that  have  been  made. 

The  other  type  retains  the  bar  gene  unchanged,  the  somatic  appear- 
ance of  full  eye  being  due  to  the  formation  of  a  modifying  gene  outside 
of  the  sex  chromosome.  This  new  gene  is  effective  in  producing  full  eye 
when  present  in  double  dose  in  females  heterozygous  for  the  bar  gene. 
Such  full-eyed  females  when  crossed  with  wild  full-eyed  males  produce 
males  half  of  whom  are  bar  and  females  half  of  whom  are  heterozygous 
bar. 

In  males  with  the  bar  gene  and  in  females  homozygous  for  bar  the 
double  dose  of  the  new  gene  produces  an  eye  which  is  nearly  full  but 
which  differs  from  full  in  the  presence  of  a  defect  at  the  anterior  margin. 
Such  an  eye  may  be  designated  by  the  term  "emarginate."  Emarginate 
females  when  crossed  with  full  wild  males  give  males  all  of  whom  are 
bar  and  females  all  of  whom  are  heterozygous  bar.  The  reciprocal  cross 
gives  males  all  of  whom  are  full  and  females  all  of  whom  are  heter- 
ozygous bar.  Numerous  tests  bear  out  in  detail  the  hypothesis  as  stated 
above  indicating  that  the  chromosomal  formula  for  this  type  of  female 

with  a  full  eye  is  —  ^-^    -^-^-^  for  the  emarginate-eyed  female  =^_  — 

m  B 

~ ,  and  for  the  emarginate-eyed  male      —   -— — -.     Experiments 

m  m 

are  under  way  to  determine  the  exact  locus  of  the  new  gene. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


76 

Conclusions. 
The  data  obtained  are  of  interest  in  a  number  of  ways: 

1.  Bar-eye  may  return  to  the  full-eyed  somatic  condition  by  two  dis- 
tinct routes,  (a)  Reverse  mutation  in  the  bar  gene  may  bring  the  in- 
dividual back  to  the  condition  of  the  full-eyed  stock  not  only  in  somatic 
appearance  but  also  in  genetic  behavior,  (b)  A  similar  somatic  ap- 
pearance of  full-eye  maV  be  produced  by  a  mutation  in  one  of  the  auto- 
somes which  leaves  the  original  bar  gene  unchanged,  as  proven  by  the 
fact  that  the  crosses  between  new  full-eyed  females  and  full-eyed  wild 
males  yield  low  bar  individuals.  Change  in  a  gene  and  production  of 
new  genes  without  change  in  the  principal  gene  may  produce  the  same 
result  somatically.  Breeding  tests  alone  can  show  the  difference.  The 
change  in  the  principal  gene  brings  the  individual  truly  to  its  original 
condition. 

2.  Both  of  these  mutations  occurring  as  they  did  in  the  course  of 
upward  selection  furnished  material  of  immediate  value  in  aiding  the 
prog^ress  of  upward  selection  so  that  it  is  proper  to  say  that  with  the 
aid  of  mutations  occurring  during  the  course  of  the  experiment  the  bar- 
eyed  mutant  was  returned  to  its  original  full  condition.  It  is  not  in- 
tended, however,  to  emphasize  the  fact  that  these  mutations  have  so  far 
appeared  only  in  the  high  line  and  not  in  the  low  line.  Whether  this  is 
merely  a  matter  of  chance  or  has  a*  fundamental  significance  can  be  de- 
termined only  by  further  observation. 

3.  The  genetic  behavior  of  the  type  of  full  eye  due  to  the  addition 
of  an  accessory  factor  is  similar  to  that  of  the  individuals  of  the  high 
selected  line  before  the  appearance  of  the  mutants  of  large  degree.  The 
difference  between  high  bar  and  low  bar  is  due  to  accessory  factors  in 
the  same  way.  In  other  words  the  accessory  factors  with  pronounced 
somatic  effect  are  different  in  no  respect  but  degree  from  the  the  acces- 
sory factors  with  small  effect  which  form  the  ordinary  materials  for  the 
action  of  selection. 

4.  It  is  evident  that  with  respect  to  this  one  character,  facet  num- 
ber, three  separate  conditions  contributed  to  the  effectiveness  of  selec- 
tion; first,  the  differences  in  accessory  autosomal  genes  present  at  the 
beginning  of  selection;  second,  the  new  autosomal  genes  arising  during 
the  course  of  selection,  and.  third   the  mutations  in  the  bar  gene.     The 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


77 

original  differences  are  comparatively  of  low  degree,  and  the  new  auto- 
somal genes  represent  in  some  cases  small  differences  in  somatic  appear- 
ance and  in  one  case  a  large  difference.  The  mutations  in  the  bar  gene 
so  far  have  been  of  large  degree  in  all  cases,  bringing  the  bar  stock  back 
to  its  original  condition. 

5.  The  demonstration  of  all  three  of  these  modes  of  producing  an 
effective  selection  in  the  case  of  a  single  character  indicates  clearly  that 
the  selection  problem  and  with  it  the  problem  of  stability  of  the  unit 
factor  or  gene  is  not  capable  of  solution  by  any  single  formula. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


79 


Dwarfing  Effect  of  Attacks  of  Mites  of  the  Genus 
Eriophyes  Upon  Norway  Maples. 


Howard  E.  Enders,  Purdue  University. 


The  peculiar  dwarfed  and  somewhat  blighted  condition  of  a  portion 
of  the  branches  of  Norway  maple  trees  in  and  about  the  town  of  Her- 
shey,  Pennsylvania,  attracted  my  attention  during  August  of  1917,  and 
an  effort  was  made  to  determine  the  cause  of  this  condition.     The  gen- 


Fig.   1.    Norway  maple  infested  with   mites    (Eriophyes)    for  a   period  of  at   least 
three  years.    Its  stunted  growth  is  suffsestive  of  excessive  trimming. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


80 

eral  appearance  (Figure  1)  of  the  trees  seemed  to  indicate  that  they  had 
been  heavily  pruned  one  or  more  seasons  ago.  They  were  greatly 
branched  in  a  manner  suggestive  of  the  excessive  branching  often  seen 
in  the  "witches'  brooms"  on  the  hackberry. 


Fig.  2.    Short  branches  of  infested  Norway  maple,  partially  defoliated  to 
show  the  dwarfed  condition  of  foliage  and  stems. 

At  the  time  of  observation  a  portion  of  the  terminal  branches  bore 
some  foliage  that  was  green  but  many  of  the  leaves  were  small  and 
brown-edged,  while  others  had  become  wholly  brown  in  the  affected 
regions.  A  weak  post-season  growth  of  an  inch  or  thereabout  had 
occurred  in  which  the  young  tender  foliage  was  expanding  in  an  appar- 
ently normal  manner.    This  type  of  post-season  growth  was  quite  sim« 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


81 

ilar  to  that  reported  by  Miss  A.  M.  Taylor  in  1914  (Journal  of  Agricul- 
tural Science,  Vol.  6),  as  characteristic  of  gooseberry — Ribes  grossularia 
— in  England,  infested  with  Eriophyes  ribis  (Nalepa).  In  the  plants 
which  she  studied  she  found  that  after  the  first  effects  of  the  attack  by 


Fig.  3.    Short  branches  of  infcated  Norway  maple,  partially  defoliated  to 
show  the  dwarfed  condition  of  foliage  and  stems.  « 

Eriophyes  were  overcome  the  later  growth  of  foliage  and  wood  was  ap- 
parently normal,  though  many  of  the  early  leaves  bore  "blisters"  that 
ranged  from  single  to  more  or  less  confluent  masses. 

The  maples,  however,  seemed  not  to  recover  until  too  late  in  the 
season  to  make  a  marked  growth.  The  foliage  bore  no  malformations, 
blisters,  typical  erineums,  or  galls  that  would  indicate  the  cause  of  in- 

6—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


82 

jury.  It  was  observed  that  many  of  the  leaves  bore  numerous  trichomes 
on  the  under  surface  at  the  proximal  portion  of  the  laminse  where  the 
veins  converge  toward  the  petiole. 

Large  numbers  of  mites,  identified  as  Eriophyes  sp(?),*  "wrere 
seen  to  crawl  from  beneath  and  among  the  trichomes  when  the  point  of 
a  teasing  needle  was  drawn  through  these  regions.  When  the  mites  are 
thus  disturbed  they  crawl  rapidly  over  the  under  surface  of  the  leaf,  or 


Fiflr.  4.  Eriophyes  vitis  from  Banks,  in  "The  Acarina  or  Mites."  It  is  here  repro- 
duced to  indicate  the  generic  character  of  the  maple  mites  rather  than  the  specific 
characters. 

stand  on  end  and,  attached  by  the  caudal  adhesive  disk,  sway  the  anterior 
end  of  the  body  in  a  circle;  others  seem  to  make  a  leap,  and  disappear 
from  sight.  No  effort  was  made  to  determine  the  relative  number  on 
each  infested  leaf,  but  it  was  estimated  to  be  a  hundred  or  more  for 
the  many  leaves  that  were  examined. 

During  the  cooler  hours  of  the  morning  the  mites  were  to  be  found 

♦  The  author  has  not  found  it  possible  to  procure  satisfactory  material  for  drawings, 
since  his  interruption  in  the  observations,  therefore,  a  drawing  of  Eriophyes  vitis  by 
Banks  (in  Report  No.  108.  Contributions  from  the  Bureau  of  Entomology,  U.  S.  Dept. 
Afirr.,  Washinprton,  D.  C,  1915.  on  "The  Acarina  or  Mites"),  is  introduced  to  indicate 
the  character  of  the  mites,  rather  than  the  species,  which  infest  the  Norway  maple. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


83 

among  the  trichomes  of  the  leaves,  but  during  the  warmer  periods  of  the 
day  a  few  were  found  usually  crawling  about  the  under  surface  of  the 
leaves,  chiefly  close  to  the  main  veins. 

Foliage  was  examined  after  a  light  frost  late  in  August,  and  again 
after  a  killing  frost  early  in  September.  In  the  first  instance  relatively 
few  mites  remained  among  the  trichomes,  and  after  the  killing  frost 
none  were  found  on  the  leaves,  but  a  much  smaller  nimiber — ^ten  to  twen- 
ty— ^was  found  in  the  axils  of  the  leaves,  and  around  the  young  buds 
where  they  seem  to  have  taken  shelter.  Three  instances  were  observed 
in  which  a  single  mite,  and  another  in  which  two,  had  pressed  into  the 
young  buds,  just  beneath  the  outer  scale-leaves. 

An  unexpected  interruption  in  the  observations  made  it  impossible 
to  trace  the  effect  of  cold  upon  the  mites,  and  to  study  their  method  of 
passing  the  winter,  if  it  actually  occurs.  Twigs  collected  through  the 
kindness  of  Mr.  Charles  Gemmill,  student  in  Lebanon  Valley  College, 
Annville,  Pennsylvania,  were  sent  me  early  in  October,  but  I  was  unable 
to  locate  the  mites  in  any  of  the  buds,  or  in  the  axils  of  such  leaves  as 
remained  attached  to  the  twigs.  None  of  the  buds  showed  any  swelling 
or  enlargement  that  could  suggest  the  "big  bud"  similar  to  that  observed 
in  the  black-currant  infested  with  Eriophyes  ribis  (Nalepa).  Miss  Tay- 
lor (Jour.  Agri.  Sci.,  Vol.  6)  in  1914  described  the  enlargement  of  buds 
on  black-currant  in  England,  when  so  infected.  In  that  instance  the 
mites  penetrate  the  buds,  causing  them  to  swell,  and  if  badly  infested,  to 
die  without  opening.  She  found  the  mites  to  breed  throughout  much  of 
the  year,  and  to  migrate  in  the  spring  when  the  buds  are  opening.  This 
may  be  suggestive  of  the  possible  mode  of  hibernation  of  Eriophyes 
(species  undetermined)  in  the  maple,  but  without  producing  hypertrophy 
of  the  buds. 

Similar  stunted  growth  of  Norway  maples  was  observed  in  other 
towns,  and  occasionally  along  the  highways  of  Lebanon  and  Dauphin 
counties  in  Pennsylvania,  in  sufficient  numbers  to  suggest  a  wide  dis- 
persal of  these  mites  through  the  agency  of  birds  or  insects  rather  than 
by  the  wind.  English  sparrows  crowded  into  the  trees  in  large  numbers 
in  Hershey,  and  it  is  quite  possible  that  they  may  carry  many  of  these 
small  mites  on  their  legs  and  body,  from  tree  to  tree,  and  even  from  vil- 
lage to  village  in  their  migrations. 

Though  the  trees  showed  no  very  serious  ill  effects  from  the  attack 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


84 

of  1917,  it  was  apparent  that  growth  had  been  retarded  and  that  sub- 
sequent attacks  would  mar  their  beauty  permanently.  An  extrwne  case 
of  injury  by  mites  is  clearly  indicated  in  the  accompanying  photographs 
(Figures  1,  2,  and  3),  of  a  tree  and  branches  which  have  been  infested 
for  a  period  of  at  least  three  years. 

The  remedies  which  Professor  Slingerland  found  effective  for  mites 
that  attack  other  plants  may  prove  effective  on  the  maple.  He  has 
found  that  they  can  be  exterminated  by  spraying  trees  iu  winter  with 
kerosene  emulsion  diluted  with  five  to  seven  parts  of  water.  This  will 
penetrate  buds  and  kill  the  mites  which  hibernate  there. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


85 
Where  the  Feeble-Minded  Are  Self-Supporting. 


Hazel  Hansford,  Indiana  University. 


It  has  long  been  recognized  that  many  of  the  feeble-minded  can  be 
made  self-supporting  in  a  relatively  simple  environment  if  properly 
trained  for  the  things  which  they  can  best  do.  This  is  being  done  for  a 
small  number  of  these  unfortunates  in  some  of  our  institutions.  The 
boys  are  being  taught  wood  work,  farming  under  supervision,  while  the 
girls  learn  to  cook,  sweep,  and  to  do  many  other  simple  household  tasks. 
In  this  way  they  earn  their  keep,  whereas  if  turned  loose  in  the  world, 
most  likely  they  would  become  dependents. 

Very  little  is  being  done  in  the  way  of  educating  our  mental  defec- 
tive to  earn  his  own  living.  Our  state  law  compels  him  to  attend  the 
public  schools  until  he  is  sixteen,  where  he  studies  the  same  things  as 
the  normal  children.  He  remains  in  each  grade  for  two  or  three  semes- 
ters, or  until  the  teacher  is  tired  and  is  ready  to  push  him  onto  the  next 
instructor.  As  a  result  he  ends  up  in  the  fourth  or  fifth  grade  with 
nothing  in  his  head  to  show  for  his  long  years  of  wasted  time,  the 
wasted  time  of  the  teacher,  and  the  other  pupils.  He  knows  no  arith- 
metic, grammar,  or  history.  All  has  gone  into  one  ear  and  out  of  the 
other.  He  is  turned  loose  with  no  training.  He  and  his  brothers  and 
sisters  go  into  unskilled  labor,  maybe.  Sometimes  their  life-long  profes- 
sion of  idleness  begins  immediately.  If  they  are  lucky  enough  to  reside 
some  distance  from  town,  they  will  probably  get  by  as  farm  tenants — the 
kind  that  moves  to  a  new  place  every  year. 

For  some  time  the  writer  has  been  making  a  study  of  a  family  of 
mental  defectives  and  it  has  been  interesting  to  note  the  kind  of  occupa- 
tions common  to  the  different  g^roups  within  the  larger  group.  To  give 
some  idea  of  two  of  these  groups  and  their  characteristic  employments, 
some  facts  concerning  the  family  will  be  given  very  briefly. 

About  1798  there  came  from  Virginia  to  Kentucky  a  man  whom  we 
will  call  John  Jones.  We  know  little  about  him  except  that  he  hunted 
most  of  the  time.  His  family  raised  com,  part  of  which  was  made  into 
commeal,  and  part  into  that  beverage  for  which  the  Kentucky  mountains 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


86 

are  famous.  He  had  eight  children  all  of  whom  lived  and  died  in  or 
near  the  old  homestead,  except  two,  who  came  to  the  southern  part  of  the 
State  of  Indiana.  About  all  the  descendants  of  children  numbers  2,  4, 
and  7  are  still  living  in  the  Kentucky  mountains  from  twenty  to  fifty 
miles  from  a  railroad.  The  descendants  of  child  number  5  settled  in 
Orange  County  of  this  State.  The  descendants  of  child  number  1  are  in 
two  groups,  the  legitimate  and  the  illegitimate.  The  former  are  also  in 
the  mountains  while  the  descendants  of  the  illegitimate  are  in  Indiana. 
In  1856  the  illegitimate  son  of  number  1  came  here  to  live.  He  and  his 
family  left  their  home  because  they  could  no  longer  make  a  living  there. 
For  two  years  the  crops  had  failed  to  grow  and  no  com  had  been  raised 
to  make  their  bread  and  mush.  Other  people  have  said  that  it  failed  to 
grow  because  the  family  was  too  shiftless  to  tend  it.  The  man  and  the 
three  older  children  walked,  while  the  wife  and  the  two  younger  ones 
rode  on  an  old  broken  down  mule.  He  carried  an  iron  skillet  in  his 
hand  and  when  night  came,  he  would  cook  what  he  could  find  or  beg. 
Haystacks,  bams,  and  sympathetic  country  folks  furnished  lodging.  In 
this  manner  they  finally  reached  the  south-central  part  of  Indiana. 

There  they  made  their  home,  and  from  that  time  until  this  they 
have  rapidly  multiplied  and  degenerated  until  their  name  is  a  synonym 
for  shiftlessness.  Eight  more  children  were  born  in  rapid  succession, 
the  last  six  of  whom  the  mother  never  saw  because  of  blindness.  The 
descendants  of  these  thirteen  children  form  the  first  group,  of  whose 
occupations  I  wish  to  speak.  ^ 

They  live  in  or  near  a  town  of  about  12,000  in  the  south-central  part 
of  Indiana.  There  is  plenty  of  work  in  this  town  for  unskilled  laborers 
in  the  factories,  stone  quarries,  and  on  the  streets.  But  in  spite  of  the 
fact  that  there  is  plenty  of  work,  the  majority  of  the  Joneses  are  unem- 
ployed most  of  the  time. 

Those  above  the  age  of  fifteen  years  have  been  uued  for  the  follow- 
ing figures:  Out  of  fifty-seven  men  and  women,  fifty-four  are  feeble- 
minded. They  have  been  found  to  be  so  in  one  of  the  three  following 
ways:  (1)  by  a  formal  examination  in  the  laboratory;  (2)  by  a  judg- 
ment of  the  field  worker  where  the  condition  was  so  apparent  that  no 
examination  was  necessary,  and  (3)  where  the  person  has  been  judged 
feeble-minded  by  his  reaction  to  society.  The  normal  individuals  <rf 
Jones  blood  are  the  result  of  marriages  into  fairly  good  families,  and 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


87 

each  of  these  have  normal  consorts.  They  are  self-supporting  and  do 
much  to  keep  some  of  the  relatives  from  becoming  entirely  dependent 
on  the  community. 

Of  those  fifty-four  feeble-minded  men  and  women,  thirty-four  have 
received  poor  relief  for  the  greater  part  of  their  lives;  in  poor  relief  I 
include  also  the  poor  asylum  cases;  ten  have  served  sentences,  and  one 
has  spent  most  of  his  life  in  an  insane  asylum.  Four  of  the  fifty-four 
have  worked  regularly,  the  other  fifty  only  when  the  spirit  moved  them. 

Fifteen  have  no  occupation  at  all. 

Seven  do  odd  jobs. 

Six  are  fairly  good  housekeepers. 

Four  are  farm  tenants. 

Three  work  in  factories  as  unskilled  laborers. 

Three  are  housemaids. 

Three  are  prostitutes. 

Two  are  washerwomen. 

Two  are  stone  quarry  laborers. 

One  was  a  brakeman. 

One  is  a  wood  cutter. 

One  is  a  barber. 

One  is  in  a  slaughterhouse. 

One  is  a  well  cleaner. 

One  is  a  street  cleaner. 

One  is  a  hod  carrier.  • 

Seven  per  cent,  of  these  are  entirely  self-supporting. 

Twenty-nine  per  cent,  are  non  self-supporting. 

Sixty-three  per  cent,  are  partly  self-supporting. 

The  simplest  environment  in  which  we  find  the  Joneses  living  is  down 
in  the  Kentucky  mountains  where  living  conditions  are  of  the  most  prim- 
itive to  be  found.  The  district  is  so  far  from  a  railroad  and  the  roads  so 
nearly  impassable  that  they  have  never  been  far  from  their  homes.  They 
raise  all  they  eat  and  eat  all  they  raise,  or  let  it  waste,  because  there  is 
no  market.  So  there  is  no  incentive  for  folk  to  be  ambitious,  but  to 
work  just  enough  to  feed  and  clothe  themselves.  On  the  other  hand,  it  is 
necessary  that  they  do  have  the  needful  things  of  life,  for  there  is  no 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


88 

kindly  poor  relief  law  to  care  for  them,  and  oftentimes  they  are  living  so 
far  from  neighbors  that  they  could  starve  before  help  would  arrive. 

Eighty-one  adults  who  are,  or  should  be,  earning  their  living  rep- 
resent this  group.  Of  this  number  fifty  are  feeble-minded  and  thirty-one 
are  normal.  The  normal  cases  will  be  eliminated  as  they  were  in  the 
Indiana  group.    Of  the  fifty  feeble-minded  people: 

Sixteen  have  no  occupation. 
Fifteen  are  farm  tenants. 
Eight  help  at  home. 
Five  are  farmers. 
Two  hunt  gingseng. 
Two  are  bootleggers. 
One  is  a  prostitute. 
One  does  odd  jobs. 
Total,  60. 

Six  of  those  listed  as  having  no  occupation  are  not  dependents  in  the 
real  sense  of  the  word.  They  manage  to  live  without  work,  but  also 
without  begging.  They  gamble,  steal,  and  hunt.  One  entire  family  lives 
mostly  on  the  squirrels  the  men  are  able  to  kill.  Oftentimes  their  aim  is 
so  poor  that  they  miss  the  squirrels  and  kill  sheep.  The  remaining  ten 
who  are  non-self-supporting,  are  idiots  and  imbeciles,  who  could  not  care 
for  themselves  in  any  environment,  so  this  20  per  cent,  is  not  really  com- 
parable to  the  29  per  cent  of  non-supporting  individuals  in  the  Indiana 
group.  .The  people  whose  mentality  was  of  the  same  level  as  the  Indiana 
paupers,  were  all  self-supporting  in  the  simpler  environment.  And  if 
we  exclude  those  idiots  and  low  grade  imbeciles,  we  have  no  non-self- 
supporting  mental  defectives  to  compare  with  those  of  Indiana. 

It  may  be  that  the  simple  environment  is  not  responsible  for  these 
figures,  but  there  are  other  instances  where  the  feeble-minded  are  self- 
supporting  in  a  relatively  simple  environment.  In  some  of  the  European 
countries  where  the  work  history  of  a  man  is  pretty  well  determined 
when  he  is  bom,  and  where  he  is  bound  by  certain  industrial  conditions 
which  we  do  not  have  here,  there  is  less  unemployment,  tramps  are  few- 
er, and  there  is  very  much  less  unrest  and  changing  about  than  among 
our  subnormal  laborers.  In  the  institutions  which  are  run  on  the  colony 
plan,  the  inmates  are  taught  to  do  certain  things  well,  and  are  kept  at 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


89 

those  particular  tasks  by  the  men  in  charge.  It  is  now  the  dream  of 
some  of  the  men  interested  in  the  problem  of  the  care  of  mental  defec- 
tives, that  in  the  near  future  we  can  have  large  farms  or  colonies  where 
these  people  can  be  kept  at  work,  protected  from  the  complex  conditions 
of  the  outside  world  which  they  are  unable  to  meet.  And  this  will  make 
it  possible  for  them  not  only  to  take  care  of  themselves,  but  to  relieve 
society  of  the  burden  placed  upon  it  by  the  crimes  and  other  social  evils 
to  which  this  class  is  naturally  addicted. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


91 

A  Study  of  the  Action  of  Bacteria  on  Milk  Proteins.* 


George  Spitzer  and  H.  M.  Weeter,  Purdue  University. 

It  is  generally  recogrnized  that  most  bacteria  have  an  action  on  or- 
ganic food  material  which  is  characteristic  for  different  species  and  is  in- 
fluenced by  their  previous  environment  and  the  kind  and  relative  propor- 
tion of  the  different  foods  in  the  media.  As  the  food  and  water  require- 
ments of  higher  plant  and  animal  life  and  of  bacteria  are  similarly  re- 
lated, bacterial  metabolism  involves  the  change  which  the  food  materials 
undergo  by  virtue  of  bacterial  action  and  is  determined  by  the  properties 
and  composition  of  the  end  products.  With  the  present  chemical  methods 
of  analysis  it  is  possible  to  determine  with  considerable  degree  of  ac- 
curacy the  initial  composition  of  the  bacterial  foods,  also  the  end  prod- 
ucts. Of  what  takes  place  within  the  organisms  little  is  known.  Infer- 
ences can  only  be  drawn  from  the  changes  in  the  medium  and  the  nature 
of  the  enzymes  secreted  by  the  bacteria.  When  bacteria  are  grown  in  a 
medium  containing  both  proteins  and  carbohydrates  it  has  been  found 
that  the  cleavage  products  are  modified,  depending  upon  the  source  and 
chemical  complexity  of  the  protein  and  carbohydrates. 

B.  Coli,  when  grown  in  a  nitrogenous  medium  in  presence  of  easily 
fermentable  carbohydrates,  fails  to  produce  indol  or  the  production  of 
indol  is  extremely  rare,  but  when  B.  Coli  is  g^rown  in  a  medium  contain- 
ing the  same  nitrogenous  foods  in  presence  of  carbohydrates  which  do 
not  ferment  readily  indol  is  produced.  The  character  of  the  proteins 
likewise  influences  the  growth  and  metabolism  of  bacteria  and  the  cleav- 
age products  are  not  of  the  same  kind  and  character.  The  proteins  are 
hydrolized  by  bficterial  enzymes  into  simpler  complexes,  such  as  pro- 
teoses, peptones,  and  possibly  peptids  and  amino  acids. 

There  is  a  marked  difference  depending  on  the  source  of  nitrogen, 
and  a  still  greater  difference  depending  on  the  species  of  bacteria,  in  the 
production  of  cleavage  products.  According  to  Taylor  (Ztschr.  f. 
Physiol.  Chem.,  Vol.  36),  B.  Coli  digests  casein  mainly  into  proteoses  and 
peptones  with  ihe  formation  of  only  a  small  per  cent,  of  amino  acids, 


•  "Contribution  from   Purdue  University  Agricultural   Experiment  Station.   Depart- 
ment of  Dairy  Husbandry." 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


92 

while  when  grown  in  egg  meat  mixture  according  to  Rettger  (Journal 
Bio.  Chem.,  Vol.,  13),  this  same  bacterium  produces  profound  changes, 
giving  indol,  skatol,  and  amino  acids. 

Also,  the  utilization  of  any  of  these  simpler  nitrogenous  products 
of  hydrolysis  depends  upon  the  life  history  and  the  species  of  the  bacteria 
and  of  food  material  other  than  the  nitrogen  compounds;  that  is,  carbo- 
hydrates, salts,  etc.  Concerning  the  utilization  of  the  amino  acids,  under 
certain  conditions  the  basic  amino  acids  or  diamino  acids  are  used  to  a 
greater  extent  as  a  source  of  nitrogen  instead  of  the  monoamine  adds, 
and  the  reverse  may  happen ;  the  monoamine  acids  are  used  more  readily 
and  fail  to  appear  in  the  final  products. 

From  our  own  work  during  the  past  year  on  bacterial  metabolism, 
unpublished  data  are  at  hand  showing  the  utilization  of  the  amino  acids. 
Lots  of  500  c.  c.  of  sterile  milk  were  inoculated  with  pure  cultures  of  B. 
proteus,  B.  liquifaciens,  B.  subtilis,  and  B.  megatherium.  These  lots  of 
inoculated  milk  were  stored  at  room  temperature  for  six  months.  The 
nitrogen  distribution  was  then  determined,  ammonia,  melanin,  amino 
acids,  etc. 

The  following  table  shows  the  per  cent,  of  monoamine  and  diamino 
acids  obtained  upon  hydrolyzing  the  milk  before  inoculation,  also  the  per 
cent,  of  the  same  amino  acids  after  inoculation  for  six  months. 

TABLE  I. 


Sterile  Milk. 

At  End  of  Six  Months*  Incubatioii. 

Monoamino 
Acid  N. 

% 

Diamino 
Acid  N. 

% 

Monoamino 
Acid  N. 

% 

Diamino 
Acid  N. 

% 

B.  proteus 

B.  liquifaciens 

B.  subtilis 

B.  megatherium 

56. 50* 
56.50 
56.50 
56.50 

23.66 
23.66 
23.66 
23.66 

42.14 
45.02 
54.14 
40.00 

5.61 
5.82 
7.61 
7.24 

*Per  cent,  of  total  nitrogen. 

In  Table  I  the  relative  proportion  of  the  utilization  of  the  two  groups 
of  amino  acids  is  shown  for  the  four  different  bacteria.  It  will  be  noted 
that  the  diamino  acids  are  used  in  greater  amounts  than  the  monoamino 
acids. 

Table  II  shows  the  per  cent,  of  the  total  monoamino  and  diamine 
acid  nitrogen  utilized  by  the  four  bacteria  calculated  from  Table  I. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


93 


TABLE  II. 

Monoaiuino 

Acid  N. 

% 

Diamino 
Acid  N. 

Vo 

B.  proteu8._ 

25.42 
20.32 
4.17 
29.15 

76.29 
75.40 

B.  subtilis 

B.  megatherium 

67.83 
69.40 

In  general,  this  is  in  agreement  with  the  work  of  Robinson  and  Tar- 
tar (Journal  Bio.  Chem.,  Vol.  XXX,  page  135).  However,  this  compar- 
ison can  only  be  roughly  made  since  their  medium  consisted  of  an  aqueous 
soil  extract  plus  a  nitrogenous  food  material;  i.  e.,  fibrin,  pep  ton,  egg 
albumen,  gliadin,  and  casein,  with  a  small  amount  of  carbohydrate  in 
the  form  of  mannite  and  synthetic  solution  of  salts  in  addition  to  the 
salts  extracted  from  the  soil. 

The  pure  cultures  used  by  Robinson  and  Tartar  were  B.  mycoides, 
B.  subtilis,  and  B.  vulgaris.  The  above  facts  concerning  the  utilization 
of  the  amino  acids  by  bacteria  are  in  harmony  with  the  work  of  most 
investigators  on  bacterial  metabolism.  No  doubt  the  utilization  of  the 
amino  acids  is  influenced  by  the  character  and  quantity  of  proteins  and 
carbohydrates  present  in  the  media.  We  know,  if  carbohydrates  are 
absent  or  hydrolyzed  into  compounds  which  do  not  yield  the  desired  food 
material — namely,  the  carbon — as  readily  as  the  original  carbohydrates, 
bacteria  must  necessarily  derive  their  carbon  supply  from  the  protein 
or  amino  acids.  There  is  no  quantitative  relation  connecting  the  in- 
crease of  acidity  with  the  loss  of  carbohydrates  by  bacterial  action  on 
the  respective  carbohydrates.  So  some  of  the  carbohydrates  must  be 
used  in  supplying  energy  to  the  organisms. 

About  six  years  ago,  while  the  senior  author  was  conducting  an 
extensive  investigation  concerning  the  keeping  qualities  of  butter  when 
placed  in  cold  storage,  the  results  of  the  investigation  suggested  to  him 
the  advisability  of  taking  up  a  systematic  study  of  pure  cultures  of 
known  bacteria  in  a  medium  composed  of  milk  proteins  in  presence  of 
carbon  compounds  such  as  lactose  and  lactic  acid,  etc. 

By  pursuing  this  method  of  investigation  it  will  be  possible  to  arrive 
at  more  definite  information  regarding  the  bacterial  action  on  milk  pro- 
teins and  the  character  and  quantity  of  the  final  cleavage  products.    The 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


94 

selection  of  the  respective  bacteria  are  those  frequently  found  in  milk, 
cream,  and  butter.  By  the  selection  of  these  bacteria  and  using  a  medium 
which  is  naturally  present  in  milk  products,  we  are  able,  in  a  great 
measure,  to  avoid  introducing  disturbing  factors  on  the  end  products, 
also  factors  foreign  to  our  previous  work  concerning  the  changes  pro- 
duced in  stored  butter. 

Our  preliminary  study  included  the  following  bacteria:  B.  proteus 
vulgaris,  B.  viscosus,  B.  butyricus,  B.  mycoides,  B.  lactis  acidi,  B.  mesen- 
tericus,  B.  liquifaciens,  B.  fluorescens  putidus,  B.  subtilis,  B.  megather- 
ium, and  B.  coli.  The  medium  was  sterilized  milk  to  which  the  pure 
cultures  were  added  and  kept  at  room  temperature.  The  pure  cultures 
were  previously  grown  in  the  same  media  and  transfers  were  made 
three  times  before  being  used  for  experiment.  At  intervals  of  three 
days  an  analysis  of  the  inoculated  milk  was  made.  The  following  prod- 
ucts were  determined  each  time  the  analysis  was  made:  acidity,  alde- 
hyde number*,  lactore  (polariscope) ,  ammonia  (Folin's  method),  and 
nitrogen  compounds  not  precipitated  by  phospho  tungstic  acid.  This  was 
continued  for  five  periods  or  during  a  period  of  sixteen  days.  (First 
period  four  days.) 

The  following  table  shows  the  changes  in  the  nitrogenous  constitu- 
ents of  the  milk  and  the  change  in  lactose  by  the  different  bacteria  at 
the  end  of  the  sixteenth  day. 

TABLE  III. 

Showing  the  per  cent,  of  gain  of  ammonia  (NHi)  and  amid  nitroKen  baaed  on  total  nitrogen 
and  the  loss  of  lactose  baaed  on  the  total  lactose. 


Ammonia  (NHi), 

Amid. 

Lactnse. 

N.  'ri  Gain. 

N.  ^c  Gain. 

%Lo«i. 

B.  proteua 

5  42 

1  63             ' 

27.65 

B.  >iscosu8 

11.01 

22.13 

50  30 

B.  butyricus 

4.49 

6  59             I 

23.04 

B.  mycoides 

10  28 

8.38              1 

14  84 

B.  Inctb  acidi 

2  04 

1.88 

34.87 

B.  mesentericus 

10  28 

12  38 

62.92 

B.  liquifaciens . 

20  20 

25  63 

60.00 

B.  fluorescens  putidus 

1  46 

2  13 

17  83 

B.  subtilis 

12  10 

22.84 

47.10 

B.  megatherium 

7  34 

24  64 

54.11 

B.coli 

3.66 

3  63 

17.63 

*  The   aldehyde    number   sravc    no   more   information    conceminsr   protein    hydrolysis 
than  did  phospho-tunsstic  acid. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


95 

Ammonia,  amid  nitrogen,  lactose,  and  acidity  were  estimated  in  the 
sterile  milk  before  inoculation  for  the  purpose  of  comparison.  This 
grave  for  lactose  4.99  per  cent.,  total  nitrogen  .56  per  cent.,  and  acidity 
.17  per  cent,  as  lactic  acid.  Ammonia  .89  per  cent,  and  for  amid  nitrogen 
2.87  per  cent,  based  on  total  nitrogen  present  in  the  sterile  milk. 

The  changes  in  acidity  for  the  different  bacteria  are  shown  in  Table 
IV. 

TABLE  IV. 
Showing  changes  in  acidity,  expressed  in  per  c«it.  of  lactic  acid,  during  the  period  of  sixteen  days. 


Per  Cent.  Lactic  Acid. 


B.  proteus 

B.  visooeus 

B.  butyricus 

B.  myooides 

B.  lactis  acidi 

B.  meeeotericuB 

B.  liquifaciens  

B.  fluoreacens  putidus. . 

B.  subtilis 

B.  megatherium 

B.  coli 


.027 
.324 
.180 
.261 
1.161 
.459 
.909 
.045 
.468 
.360 
.135 


Comparing  Tables  III  and  IV,  it  is  shown  that  the  acidity  of  the 
milk  medium  is  not  in  proportion  to  the  loss  of  lactose,  nor  gain  in 
ammonia.  Therefore  neither  the  production  of  ammonia  nor  the  acidity 
is  an  exclusive  measure  of  the  activity  of  the  organisms.  It  has  been 
stated  that  the  production  of  ammonia  is  an  index  of  the  metabolic  activ- 
ity of  the  organisms.  This  must  be  taken  with  some  qualification  inas- 
much as  proteolysis  does  not  take  place  by  leaps;  that  is,  that  the  differ- 
ent cleavage  products  are  produced  in  regular  order,  as  proteoses,  pep- 
tids,  amino  acids,  etc.,  but  it  is  more  natural  and  in  harmony  with  en- 
zymic  action  on  proteins  and  carbohydrates,  that  as  soon  as  proteolysis 
begins,  a  series  of  simpler  compounds  are  formed  and  all  the  cleavage 
products  appear,  the  proportion  depending  upon  the  medium,  kind  of  or- 
ganisms, and  enzymes  produced  by  each  specific  bacterium.  Since  it  is 
possible  to  measure  the  production  amino  acids  and  ammonia  at  short 
intervals  with  a  good  degree  of  accuracy,  it  has  given  additional  evidence 
to  show  the  mode  and  rate  of  the  activity  of  bacterial  metabolism  and 
their  proteolytic  power. 

Of  the  eleven  bacteria  studied  there  was  a  continual  change  in  acid- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


96 

ity  from  the  first  period  until  the  last,  except  the  lactic  acid  bacillus 
which  produced  its  maximum  acidity  within  the  first  period  (four  days) 
which  was  1.61  per  cent,  as  lactic  acid.  No  change  in  acidity  occurred 
after  this  period,  nor  was  there  any  increase  in  ammonia.  The  amid 
nitrogen  increased  slightly  at  the  expiration  of  four  days  and  there  was 
a  agin  of  amid  nitrogen  of  .0077  per  cent,  and  at  the  expiration  of  the 
sixteenth  day  there  was  a  gain  of  .0105  of  amid  nitrogen,  a  gain  of  .5 
per  cent,  on  total  nitrogen,  showing  a  continual  proteolytic  action  due 
either  to  enzymes  or  auto-proteolytic  digestion. 

It  may  be  noted  that  some  bacteria  utilizing  the  larger  amount  of 
lactose  were  also  quite  active  in  the  production  of  ammonia  and  amino 
acids.  On  the  other  hand,  in  Table  III  the  fermentation  of  lactose  was 
proportionately  greater  than  the  production  of  ammonia  and  amino  acids 
by  B.  proteus,  B.  butyricus,  B.  mesentericus,  B.  fluorescens  put.,  and  B. 
Coli. 

We  hope  to  study  further  the  action  of  these  organisms  in  pure  cul- 
ture on  nitrogen  from  different  sources,  the  effect  of  carbohydrates  and 
also  the  associative  action  of  these  cultures  on  milk  proteins. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


97 
Plastids. 


D.  M.  MOTTIER,  Indiana  University. 


(Abstract) 

The  major  part  of  the  results  of  an  extended  study  on  plastids  and 
similar  bodies  in  cells  of  various  plants,  of  which  the  following  is  an 
abstract,  has  been  published  in  the  Annals  of  Botany,  Vol.  32,  pp.  91-114, 
1918. 

The  investigation  was  concerned  chiefly  with  the  origin  of  leuco- 
plasts  and  chloroplasts  from  their  primordia,  as  found  in  meristematic 
cells.  The  primordia  of  leucoplasts  and  chloroplasts  appear  as  very 
minute,  granular  or  rod-shaped  bodies,  which  multiply  by  direct  division. 
From  such  primordia,  leucoplasts  develop  as  rounded  or  pear-shaped 
bodies  with  the  starch  inclusion  accumulating  within.  In  case  the  pri- 
mordium  is  rod-shaped,  the  leucoplasts,  in  such  tissues  as  the  root  tip  of 
Pisum,  take  on  the  foi-m  of  a  hand  mirror  with  the  inclusion  in  the  larger 
end. 

In  certain  typical  cases  the  primordium  of  the  chloroplast  may  first 
become  lenticular  with  a  pale  center  and  a  densely-staining  periphery. 
With  further  growth  they  finally  assume  the  form  present  in  the  adult 
plant  organ. 

Morphologically  the  primordia  of  leucoplasts  and  chloroplasts  are 
precisely  alike.  It  may  be  of  interest  to  note  that  the  morphological  iden- 
tity of  leucoplasts  and  chloroplasts  was  pointed  out  by  A.  F.  W.  Schimper 
about  thirty-eight  years  ago.  The  following  is  a  translation  of  his  sum- 
mary (Bot.  Zeit.,  p.  899,  1880) :  "The  results  of  this  brief  study  show 
that  the  deep  chasm  hitherto  supposed  to  exist  between  the  starch  form- 
ers in  assimilating  and  in  non-assimilating  cells  does  not,  in  fact,  exist. 
In  cells  free  from  chlorophyll  there  are  definite  organs  which  generate 
starch,  and  these  organs  are  none  other  than  undeveloped  chloroplasts 
(Chlorophyllkomer),  which  under  the  influence  of  light  are  able  to  de- 
velop into  the  latter.  On  the  other  hand,  chlorophyll  grains  are  not 
always  organs  of  assimilation  merely,  but  they  may,  in  the  conducting 
tissues  and  in  cells  which  contain  reserve  material,  function  as  starcn 

7—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


98 

formers  in  the  non-assimilating  cells;  they  produce  starch  from  assimi- 
lated materials  supplied  by  other  parts  of  the  plant." 

It  may  be  stated  also  that  the  origin  and  formation  of  starch  grains 
as  described  by  this  brilliant  Alsatian  was  essentially  correct,  as  later 
studies  of  others  have  shown.  At  that  date  the  technique  which  now  so 
clearly  brings  out  the  primordia  of  plastids  was  unknown. 

In  the  aleurone  layer  of  the  endosperm  of  Zea  Mays,  the  primordia 
of  the  aleurone  grains  are  first  recognized  as  very  minute,  rounded  gran- 
ules which  may  stain  densely  and  uniformly.  As  they  increase  in  size, 
they  become  globular  with  a  smooth  and  sharply-defined  contour  and  re- 
veal a  pale  or  colorless  center.  They  may  be  represented  by  making  a 
minute  circle  with  a  pencil.  As  they  become  older,  they  increase  in  size 
and  usually  take  on  a  pale  yellowish  or  orange  color  with  the  stains  used. 

It  may  be  remarked  also  that  the  starch  grains  in  the  endosperm  of 
Zea  originate  in  a  similar  manner  and  from  primordia  that  are  indis- 
tinguishable morphologically  from  those  of  the  aleurone  granules,  with 
the  difference  that  in  the  case  of  the  leucoplasts  the  starch  inclusion 
stains  blue  with  gentian  violet. 

In  addition  to  the  primordia  of  the  plastids  mentioned,  other  sim- 
ilar though  smaller  bodies  are  present — frequently  in  very  large  num- 
bers in  the  cells — ^which  do  not  become  either  leucoplasts  or  chloroplasts. 
To  these  I  have  confined  the  term  chondriosome.  Such  chondriosomes  are 
especially  well  demonstrated  in  cells  of  the  liverworts,  Antkoceros  and 
Marchantia. 

The  conclusion  reached  is  that  the  primordia  of  leucoplasts  and 
chloroplasts  and  the  bodies  here  designated  as  chondriosomes  are  per- 
manent organs  of  the  cell,  having  the  same  morphological  rank  as  the 
nucleus. 

The  function  of  chondriosomes  is  not  known.  It  is  generally  con- 
ceded that  they  are  concerned  in  certain  metabolic  activities  of  the  cell. 
Being  definite  organs  of  the  cell,  they  may  be  regarded  also  as  playing 
some  part  in  the  role  of  heredity. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


99 
Variation  and  Varieties  of  Zea  Mays. 


Paul  Weatherwax,  Indiana  University. 


Indian  com  is  commonly  known  to  be  a  very  variable  plant,  and  any 
farmer  can  name  ofF-hand  from  a  dozen  to  fifty  more  or  less  definite 
varieties.  Many  attempts  have  been  made  to  dispose  of  the  plant  in  a 
technical  way  by  naming,  describing,  and  classifying  these  varieties,  but 
the  layman,  and  even  the  botanist  who  has  not  made  a  special  study  of 
the  subject,  is  much  in  the  dark  as  to  what  nomenclature  is  advisable 
in  speaking  scientifically  of  com.  To  point  out  briefly  the  range  of  vari- 
ability of  the  plant  and  to  discuss  critically  some  of  the  technical  names 
that  have  been  applied  to  the  varieties  of  corn  is  the  object  of  this  paper. 

In  all  parts  of  the  maize  plant  there  is  a  striking  variability  of 
size.  I  have  grown  healthy  plants  in  a  normal  environment  which  were 
eighteen  inches  tall  at  maturity;  and  plants  twenty- four  feet  tall  have 
been  reported.  Some  plants  have  stems  no  larger  than  a  lead  pencil,  and 
the  stems  of  others  measure  six  inches  in  circimiference.  The  leaves  and 
other  vegetative  parts  vary  proportionately. 

Stalks  of  most  varieties  bear  only  one  or  two  ears,  but  as  many  as 
ten  well-developed  ears  have  been  seen  on  a  single  stalk.  An  ear  may 
have  from  four  to  thirty  rows  of  grains,  and  there  is  as  great  a  variation 
in  the  number  of  grains  in  a  row. 

The  fruit  of  the  plant,  being  the  economic  part  and  the  part  best 
known,  has  been  made  the  basis  of  most  classifications.  The  pericarp 
varies  from  white  through  shades  of  pink,  red,  and  yellow  to  a  dark 
brown,  and  definite  color  patterns  in  the  form  of  stripes  are  common. 
The  endosperm  is  usually  characterized  by  the  development  of  a  large 
amount  of  starch,  but  in  sweet  com  the  starch  is  partly  replaced  by  an- 
other carbohydrate.  In  physical  character  the  endosperm  is  partly  soft 
and  partly  corneous,  and  these  parts  have  a  more  or  less  definite  ratio 
and  arrangement  in  each  variety.  The  soft  portion  is  always  white;  the 
corneous  part  may  be  white  or  yellow.  The  aleurone  is  white,  red,  or 
blue  to  black,  and  mixtures  of  either  of  these  colors  with  white  occur  in 
definite  patterns  in  some  varieties.    The  largest  grain  I  have  ever  seen 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


100 

weighed  fifty-six  times  as  much  as  the  smallest.  The  fruits  of  most 
varieties  are  naked,  except  for  the  well-known  covering  of  husks,  but 
there  is  a  variation  from  this  in  the  podded  types,  each  grain  of  which 
has  a  separate  covering  composed  of  the  enlarged  glimies  and  palets. 

Still  further  illustrations  of  ordinary  variability  might  be  mentioned, 
but  these  will  suffice.  Besides  these,  there  are  some  less  conmion  varia- 
tions— sometimes  termed  mutations  and  sometimes  reversions — ^which  add 
interest  to  our  investigations  but  complicate  our  classifications.  A  few 
examples  may  serve  as  illustrations.  The  production  of  male  elements  in 
female  inflorescences  or  female  elements  in  male  inflorescences  is  of  com- 
mon occurrence,  and  varieties  breeding  true  to  these  characteristics  have, 
in  some  instances,  been  isolated.  Emerson  has  a  variety  whose  leaves 
have  no  ligules,  and  another — a  dwarf  variety — whose  ears  bear  her- 
maphrodite flowers.  Gemert  has  isolated  a  constant  strain  whose  ear  is 
a  loose  panicle. 

The  difficulty  at  the  bottom  of  any  attempt  to  classify  the  varieties 
of  maize  is  in  the  perplexing  lack  of  correlation  between  these  variant 
characteristics.  Some  authorities  maintain  that  definite  correlations  do 
exist,  and  others  are  as  confident  that  they  are  almost  if  not  quite  inde- 
pendent of  one  another.  The  merits  of  either  argument  is  irrelevant  to 
our  present  consideration.  That  certain  physical  correlations  do  exist 
is  accepted  without  arg^ument,  but  all  the  genetic  correlations  that  have 
ever  been  discovered  are  of  little  avail  in  classification.  If  the  various 
characters  had  a  tendency  to  remain  in  groups  affording  rigid  types,  a 
basis  for  classification  would  be  provided;  but,  in  a  practical  way,  it 
seems  possible  to  combine  in  a  single  plant  or  to  separate  at  will  any 
two  characteristics  which  are  not  connected  in  any  physical  way,  allelo- 
morphs of  course  being  excepted. 

Pure  botanists,  as  well  as  those  prompted  chiefly  by  a  utilitarian 
motive,  have  taken  their  turn  at  the  problem,  and  many  articles  have 
been  published  by  experiment  stations  and  other  institutions.  Without 
going  into  details,  we  might  analyze  the  principles  employed  and  see 
what  progress  has  been  made. 

I  have  made  no  attempt  at  a  thorough  investigation  of  the  tribula- 
tions through  which  the  maize  plant  originally  passed  in  getting  itselT 
named.  Suffice  it  to  say  that  all  that  we  usually  call  maize  or  Indian 
com  passes  technically  under  the  name  Zea  Mays  L.,  the  generic  root 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


101 

being  the  Greek  name  of  some  cereal,  and  the  specific  a  corruption  of  an 
Indian  name  for  the  plant. 

When  a  distinct  variation  from  the  described  limits  of  a  species  is 
found,  it  is  customary  to  make  of  it  a  new  species  or  to  include  it  as  a 
variety  of  the  parent  species.  Both  systems  have  been  applied  to  maize. 
*Sturtevant  adopted  the  plan  of  a  trinominal  nomenclature  to  distinguish 
seven  varieties,  as  follows:  Zea  Mays  tunicata,  pod  com;  Zea  Mays 
scLCcharata,  sweet  com ;  Zea  Mays  indentataf  dent  corn ;  Zea  Mays  indur- 
ata,  flint  com;  Zea  Mays  evertay  pop  com;  Zea  Mays  amylea,  soft  com; 
and  Zea  Mays  amylea-saccharata,  a  poorly-defined  type,  part  soft  and 
part  sweet.  Some  later  authorities  have  dropped  the  word  Mays  from 
these  names,  giving  the  types  specific  iiank. 

The  inadequacy  of  either  system  is  obvious  on  close  examination. 
It  is  based  upon  a  single  set  of  characteristics,  and  in  other  respects 
each  variety  or  species  is  subject  to  the  full  range  of  variation.  In  fact 
even  these  seven  varieties  are  not  distinct  with  regard  to  the  set  of 
charactristics  which  forms  the  basis  of  division ;  pod  com  necessarily  ex- 
ists in  one  of  the  other  six  forms  or  in  a  mixture  of  them.  The  name  of 
a  species  should  stand  for  a  description;  its  value  is  lessened  as  excep- 
tions to  this  description  are  found,  and  utterly  destroyed  as  soon  as  it 
overlaps  other  species  so  far  as  to  render  them  indisting^uishable.  If 
the  names  stand  for  nothing  but  individual  characters,  then,  it  would  be 
better  to  mention  the  character  than  the  variety  possessing  it.  There  is 
also  another  disadvantage  to  the  system;  it  establishes  a  bad  precedent, 
which,  with  a  little  encouragement,  would  soon  lead  to  a  condition  bor- 
dering on  absurdity;  in  fact,  I  am  not  sure  that  it  has  not  already 
reached  that  point.  Upon  this  basis  a  number  of  new  variety  names 
have  already  sprung  into  existence,  and  more  are  due  to  arrive  at  any 
time.  Blaringhem  mutilates  a  com  plant  and  gets,  or  thinks  he  gets,  as 
a  result,  a  number  of  new  varieties  which  breed  true.  To  these  he  gives 
such  names  as  Zea  Mays  praecox,  a  very  precocious  form  indeed  if  we 
accept  his  interpretations,  and  Zea  Mays  pseudo-androgyna,  pseudo  be- 
cause a  Zea  Mays  androgyna  already  existed.  Although  his  methods  and 
conclusions  are  a  trifle  shady,  his  naming  of  the  new  forms  illustrates 
the  point  in  question.  Seed  companies  advertise  Zea  gracillima,  Zea 
Mays  gigantea  qtuidricolor,  Zea  japonica,  and  Zea  Curagua;  and  the 
Department  of  Agriculture  is  now  offering  for  distribution  through  the 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


102 

Office  of  Seed  and  Plant  Introduction  a  new  discovery,  Zea  guatemal- 
ensis,  which  seems  to  be  ordinary  com  from  Guatemala.  Besides  these 
we  have  a  Zea  Mays  chinensia  and  a  Zea  Mays  pensylvanica,  and  in  this 
way  we  might  continue  ui;itil  we  run  out  of  habitats  and  combinations  of 
characteristics.  Gemert's  Branch  Com  was  hailed  as  a  new  seventh 
species,  Zea  ramosa,  Emerson  might  have  named  his  liguleless  variety 
Zea  Mays  aligulata  and  his  dwarf  variety  Zea  Mays  pygrnea-androgyna, 
and  Stewart  or  the  writer  might,  on  discovering  the  two- flowered  condi- 
tion of  the  female  spikelets  of  Country  Gentleman  sweet  com,  have  rev- 
eled in  the  invention  of  some  such  name  as  Zea  Mays  saccharata  gem- 
inata — ^but  none  of  us  did.  The  difficulty  is  not  in  finding  new  varieties 
or  in  naming  those  found,  but  in,  avoiding  being  led  to  more  ridiculous 
eitds — in  stopping  the  naming  process  soon  enough  to  permit  a  name  to 
mean  anything;  for  when  anyone  has  made  a  complete  list  of  all  the  vari- 
eties that  he  knows,  someone  else  can  always  add  a  few  more  that  he 
knows,  or,  if  need  be,  make  a  few  to  order  by  judicious  hybridization. 

The  cause  of  this  confusion  is  easier  to  find  than  is  its  remedy.  It 
lies  in  our  limited  knowledge  of  the  evolutionary  history  of  the  plant. 
No  wild  form  of  com  has  ever  been  seen  by  civilized  man.  When  Amer- 
ica was  discovered,  the  plant  cultivated  by  the  Indians  was  almost  as 
complex  as  it  is  today.  We  can,  however,  imagine  the  evolutionary 
process  reaching  a  place  where  its  product  was  a  plant  of  more  or  less 
uniform  character,  agreeing  with  the  generic  description  of  Zea.  Further 
evolution,  aided  by  reversion,  then  proceeded  to  produce  in  isolated  envir- 
onments a  number  of  varieties  possessing  in  definite  combinations  the 
various  characteristics  already  mentioned.  If  we  knew  what  these  com- 
binations were,  we  should  have  a  basis  for  naming  varieties.  But  the 
plant  readily  hybridizes  with  other  varieties  of  its  kind,  and  these  differ- 
ent original  types,  brought  together  and  mixed  by  the  savage  or  semi- 
civilized  agriculturist,  gave  us  the  heterogenous  combination  that  we 
know  com  to  be.  It  is  probably  safe  to  say  that  there  exists  nowhere 
in  the  world  today  a  primary  variety  of  com  that  has  not  been  com- 
plicated by  hybridization  with  some  other  variety.  Hybridization  with 
teosinte,  one  of  the  nearest  relatives  of  maize,  has  added  further  difficul- 
ties in  the  tropics,  and  it  is  probably  due  to  the  limited  habitat  of  teosinte 
as  compared  with  that  of  maize,  that  the  dividing  line  between  the  two 
genera  has  not  long  ago  been  obliterated.    Few  other  plants,  wild  or  cul  • 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


103 

tivated,  present  these  difficulties,  because  few  others  combine  such  a 
rang^e  of  variability  with  such  ease  of  hybridization. 

I  am  fully  aware  that  some  of  these  latter  remarks  are  not  in  accord 
with  the  commonly  accepted  theory  of  the  hybrid  origin  of  maize,  but  I 
do  not  believe  that  theory  to  be  the  correct  explanation  of  the  origin  of 
the  plant.    My  full  discussion  of  that  point  will  be  presented  elsewhere. 

A  specific  name  is  to  be  understood  as  only  an  abbreviated  descrip- 
tion, and  the  only  thing  about  maize  that  is  constant  enough  to  have  a 
fixed  description  is  the  whole  genus.  It  is  true  that  in  some  variations  it 
borders  closely  upon  some  other  genera  and  even  encroaches  upon  the 
territory  allotted  to  another  tribe  of  grasses,  but  its  limits  are  sufficiently 
definite  to  obviate  any  doubt  as  to  whether  or  not  a  plant  under  observa- 
tion is  corn. 

The  best  taxonomic  treatment,  then,  seems  to  be  to  consider  Zea  a 
monotypic  genus  and  discard  all  other  names  than  Zec^  Maya  L.  Refer- 
ence to  the  nimierous  variations  can  be  made  to  the  characteristic  di- 
rectly and  not  to  any  arbitrary  variety  possessing  that  characteristic 
in  varying  combination  with  other  properties. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


105 
Improved  Technique  for  Corn  Pollination. 


Paul  Weatherwax,  Indiana  University. 


Many  devices  have  been  described  for  the  control  of  pollination  in 
various  plants,  and  a  number  of  these  have  been  found  especially  ser- 
viceable in  the  extensive  work  that  has  been  done  in  com  breeding.  The 
best  points  of  two  or  three  of  these  methods  have  been  combined  and 
used  successfully  during  the  past  year. 

The  protection  of  the  female  inflorescence  is  made  of  an  8x12  sheet 
of  typewriter  paper.  Its  construction  can  best  be  explained  by  reference 
to  the  accompanying  diagram.  (Fig.  1.)  Half  an  inch  along  one  end 
of  the  sheet  is  folded  over  and  pressed  down  along  AA;  one  side  is  sim- 
ilarly folded  along  BB,  and  the  other  along  CC.  One  of  these  latter  folds 
is  glued  down  to  the  other,  and  the  result  is  a  long,  flat  envelope,  open 
at  both  ends  and  reinforced  at  one  end  by  the  half -inch  fold. 

The  glue  employed  may  be  any  of  the  common  brands  that  are  pur- 
chased ready  for  use;  this  can  be  rendered  almost  insoluble  by  the  addi- 
tion of  a  small  quantity  of  any  readily  soluble  chromate  and  drying  the 
pasted  article  in  sunlight.  To  make  the  envelope  waterproof,  a  solution 
of  hard  parafRn  in  benzole  is  applied  with  a  tuft  of  cotton.  The  evapor- 
ation of  the  benzole  leaves  the  paper  dry  and  smooth  but  impregnated 
with  paraffin. 

The  manipulation  of  the  device  is  simple.  It  is  usually  best  to  re- 
move the  lamina  of  the  leaf  in  whose  axil  the  ear  is  borne  and  to  slit 
its  sheath  down  the  sides.  The  reinforced  end  of  the  envelope  is  then 
slipped  over  the  ear  and  made  tight  by  means  of  a  tuft  of  cotton  stuffed 
in  from  below.  The  top  of  the  envelope  is  folded  over  and  fastened  with 
a  paper  clip,  which  is  tied  loosely  to  the  stem  of  the  plant.  (See  Fig.  2.) 
When  the  silks  have  appeared,  the  clip  is  removed  without  untying  from 
the  stalk,  the  pollen  poured  in,  and  the  clip  replaced. 

As  the  ear  continues  to  grow,  the  string  by  which  the  clip  is  tied 
slips  upward  on  the  stalk,  and  little  further  attention  is  required.  The 
tuft  of  cotton  is  compressed  to  make  room  for  the  increasing  thickness 
of  the  ear,  until  the  latter  is  large  enough  to  burst  the  envelope  witht)ut 
injury  to  itself.    By  this  time  the  silks  are  usually  no  longer  receptive. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


106 


i """"; 


Technique  for  corn  pollination. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


107 

The  best  method  yet  found  for  collecting  the  pollen  is  by  means  of 
ordinary  paper  bags,  the  size  depending  upon  the  size  of  the  com  tassM. 
Early  in  the  morning  the  bag  is  put  over  the  tassel  and  tied  or  pinned 
around  the  stalk  below.  The  anthers  open  soon  after  the  sun  begins  to 
shine  on  the  plants,  and  from  10:00  o'clock  until  noon  is  a  good  time  to 
do  the  pollenizing.    Pollen  is  shed  most  freely  on  warm,  clear  days. 

The  method  here  described  has  a  number  of  distinct  advantages 
when  used  with  com.  The  envelopes  are  easily  made;  after  a  little 
practice  one  person  can  make  25  or  30  in  an  hour.  The  worker  is  inde- 
pendent of  the  whim  of  any  manufacturer,  paper,  twine,  and  paper  clips 
being  the  only  manufactured  things  that  are  necessary.  The  device  is 
easily  applied  and  easily  manipulated;  while  the  bag  of  pollen  is  held 
with  one  hand,  the  clip  can  be  removed  and  the  envelope  opened  with  the 
other.  The  chance  for  contamination  by  stray  pollen  grains  is  minimized, 
for  the  envelope  is  never  removed. after  being  put  in  place,  the  silks  are 
never  touched  by  the  hands,  and  the  opening  of  the  envelope  exposes  only 
a  small  surface  for  a  short  time.  No  umbrella  or  other  protecting  de- 
vice is  needed.  The  cover  is  well  ventilated  through  the  cotton,  and  the 
silks  are  protected  from  extremes  of  temperature,  desiccation,  or  humid- 
ity. Well-filled  ears  have  often  resulted  from  a  single  pollination,  and 
no  failures  have  occurred  which  could  be  attributed  to  the  lack  of  effi- 
ciency of  the  device. 

While  this  method  has  been  used  chiefly  with  com,  it  is  capable  of 
adaptation  to  other  plants.  The  envelopes  may  be  made  in  any  size. 
When  used  over  bisexual  inflorescences  to  insure  self-pollination,  the 
envelope  can  be  permanently  closed  at  the  top.  A  support  can  be  pro- 
vided when  the  plant  is  too  small  to  hold  the  weight  of  an  envelope  large 
enough  to  cover  its  inflorescence. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


109 


A  Comparison  op  the  Plant  Succession  on  Hudson  River 

Limestone  with  that  on  Niagara  Limestone, 

Near  Richmond,  Indiana. 

M.  S.  Markle,  Earlham  College. 


The  outcrops  of  bed-rock  in  the  vicinity  of  Richmond,  Ind.,  consist 
of  two  kinds  of  rock,  namely,  Niagara  limestone  and  Hudson  River  lime- 
stone. The  marked  differences  between  these  two  kinds  of  rock  make 
a  study  of  the  plant  succession  on  the  outcrops  very  interesting. 

The  principal  outcrop  of  the  Hudson  River  limestone  is  in  the  gorge 
of  the  Whitewater  River,  where  it  passes  through  the  city  of  Richmond. 
This  gorge  is  about  three  miles  long,  200-300  feet  wide  and  up  to  100  feet 
or  more  in  depth.    This  gorge  is  supposed  to  have  been  formed  immedi 
ately  after  the  ice  age. 

Outcrops  of  Niagara  limestone  occur  only  south  of  the  city,  the 
principal  ones  being  in  the  gorges  below  the  falls  at  Elliott's  Mills  and 
at  Elkhorn  Mills,  two  and  three  miles  southeast  of  Richmond,  respec- 
tively. The  present  report  is  the  result  of  a  study  of  the  outcrops  in 
the  Whitewater  gorge  and  the  gorge  at  Elkhorn  Mills. 

The  principal  differences  between  the  two  kinds  of  rocks  is  in  their 
physical  character.  The  Hudson  River  limestone  is  composed  of  alter- 
nate layers  of  calcareous  shale  and  rather  soft  limestone.  These  con- 
stituents vary  greatly  in  amount,  the  rock  consisting  in  some  places  al- 
most entirely  of  shale  and  in  others  almost  entirely  of  limestone.  Gen- 
erally, however,  they  are  about  equal  in  amount.  The  Niagara  limestone 
is  not  accompanied  by  shale,  but  consists  entirely  of  hard  thick-bedded 
limestone. 

On  account  of  the  physical  character  of  the  Hudson  River  limestone, 
the  plant  succession  in  the  Whitewater  Gorge  is  very  rapid  for  a  rock 
clifF.  The  stage  of  the  succession  of  any  part  of  the  cliff  is  due  to  the 
length  of  time  that  has  elapsed  since  the  cessation  of  active  undercut- 
ting by  the  river.  All  stages  of  succession  from  the  plantless  rock  to 
the  climax  mesophytic  forest  are  to  be  found.  The  earliest  stage  in  the 
succession  occurs  where  the  cliff  is  being  actively  eroded  by  the  river. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


110 

The  walls  are  almost  vertical.  No  plants  exist,  except  those  hanging 
from  the  top  of  the  cliff.  In  most  successions  on  bare  rock,  lichens  are 
the  pioneer  plants,  being  found  in  the  most  xerophytic  situations.  No 
lichens  are  found  anywhere  on  the  Hudson  River  limestone,  on  account, 
no  doubt,  of  the  unstable  nature  of  the  substratum.  This  plantless  stage 
persists  until  after  active  undercutting  by  the  stream  has  ceased. 

Then  the  cliff  becomes  less  steep.  The  talus  accumulates  undisturbed 
by  the  stream,  and  bears  a  considerable  vegetation.  In  this  stage  occur 
the  pioneer  cliff  plants,  occupying  the  shelves  formed  by  projecting  lay- 
ers of  limestone.  The  most  of  the  plants  are  annuals  and  many  of  them 
are  plants  that  have  slipped  down  from  the  top  of  the  cliff.  The  follow- 
ing plants  are  common  in  this  pioneer  association:  Ambrosia  arte- 
misiaefolia,  Poa  compressa,  Lactuca  scariola,  Nepeta  cataria,  Melilotus 
alba,  Dipsacus  sylvestris.  Aster  spp. 

The  shale  layers  of  the  clifF  change  readily  to  soil,  which  is  washed 
down  by  rains.  Layers  of  limestone  thus  left  projecting  break  off  of 
their  own  weight  and  fall.  With  the  consequent  reduction  in  slope,  an 
increasingly  larger  number  of  plants  gain  a  foothold.  In  addition  to 
some  of  the  pioneer  plants  mentioned  above  occur  the  following:  Equi- 
setum  arvense.  Aster  nova-angliae,  Daucus  carota,  Heracleum  lanatum, 
Melilotus  officinalis,  Verbascum  thapsus,  Elymus  canadensis,  Comus 
paniculata. 

Up  to  this  point,  the  succession  has  been  controlled  almost  entirely 
by  physiogenic  factors.  The  stage  in  succession  depends  upon  the  slope 
of  the  cliff.  When,  however,  the  slope  has  become  sufficiently  gentle  to 
permit  the  accumulation  of  a  layer  of  soil,  biogenic  factors,  those  due  to 
other  organisms,  come  in.  The  plants,  particularly  the  grasses,  hold  the 
soil  and  retard  the  further  degradation  of  the  cliff.  The  slope  of  a  por- 
tion of  the  cliff  occupied  by  a  mesophytic  forest  is  about  the  same  as  that 
of  a  portion  occupied  by  the  bush  stage.  Each  plant  association  prepares 
the  way  for  the  succeeding  one  by  holding  the  soil,  accumulating  humus 
and  providing  shade. 

The  herbs  are  soon  partially  displaced  by  a  bush  association.  The 
most  common  species  is  Rhus  aromatica,  which  often  forms  large  col- 
onies. Comus  paniculata,  Salix  longifolia,  Rhus  toxicodendron,  Vitus 
vulpina,  Crataegus,  Psedera,  Ptelea  trifoliata  Rubus,  Ribes  and  others 
are  accompanying  species. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Ill 

The  shrub  stage  is  succeeded  by  a  xerophytic  tree  stage,  correspona- 
lug  probably  to  the  usual  oak-hickory  stage.  Ulmus  americana  is  the 
pioneer  tree.  With  it  occur  Celtis  occidentalis,  Crataegrus,  Robinia 
pseudo-acacia,  Cercis  canadenses,  Prunus  americana,  Gleditschia  tria- 
canthos,  Juglans  nigra  and  Sambucus  canadensis. 

The  pioneer  tree  association  gradually  merges  into  the  ultimate 
stage  of  the  region,  the  mesophytic  forest.  Mesophytism  is^  indicated  by 
the  following  species:  Fagrus  grandifolia,  Acer  saccharum.Cgoprinu^ car- 
oliniana,  Ostrya  virginica,  Asimina  triloba,  Impatiens  pallida,  I.  biflora, 
Viola  cucullata,  Galium  spp. 

For  a  more  complete  account  of  the  succession  in  the  Whitewater 
Gorge,  see  a  paper  by  the  writer  in  the  proceedings  of  the  Indiana  Acad- 
my  of  Science  for  1910. 

The  rock  exposed  in  the  gorge  at  Elkhom  Falls  is  Niagara  limestone. 
The  falls  are  occasioned  by  the  presence  underneath  the  hard  Niagara 
limestone  of  a  softer  layer,  which  is  probably  Hudson  River  limestone. 
Below  the  falls  is  a  gorge  about  one-half  mile  in  length  and  150  to  350 
feet  in  width.  On  the  walls  of  this  gorge,  various  stages  in  plant  succes- 
sion may  be  observed. 

In  general,  the  earliest  stages  in  the  succession  are  to  be  found 
nearest  the  falls,  though  they  may  be  found  wherever  a  rejuvenescence 
of  the  succession  has  occurred.  The  pioneer  association  consists  almost 
entirely  of  lichens,  a  large,  grray,  leathery  species  of  Umbillicaria  being 
the  most  prominent.  This  lichen  covers  the  rock  in  all  exposed  situa- 
tions, sometimes  growing  to  a  diameter  of  three  inches. 

The  lichen  association  is  followed  by  another,  made  up  of  a  small 
black  moss,  probably  a  species  of  Grimmia,  and  such  seed  plants  as  Poa 
compressa,  Nepeta  cataria,  Verbascum  thapsus.  Aster  and  Solidago. 

These  are  succeeded,  after  further  weathering  of  the  rock  and  the 
accumulation  of  humus  in  the  widening  cracks,  by  an  association  dom- 
inated by  Hydrangea  arborescens  and  Aquilegia  canadensis.  These  may 
be  accompanied  by  Psedera  quinquefolia. 

The  falls  overhang  a  distance  of  10  to  20  feet,  on  account  of  the 
weathering  away  of  the  softer  lower  stratum.  For  the  same  reason, 
the  cliff  soon  becomes  overhanging.  This  condition  is  more  marked  where 
stream  action  is  prominent.  Under  these  overhanging  cliffs  a  very  mes- 
ophytic association  develops.    Here  occur  Conocephalus,  Cystopteris  bul- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


112 

bifera,  Camptosorus  rhizophyllus,  Pilea  pumila,  Aquilegia  canadensis 
and  Hydrangea  arborescens.  Psedera  quinquefolia  hangs  in  long  stream- 
ers from  the  top  of  the  clifF.  On  the  edge  of  the  cliff  or  on  the  talus  be- 
neath, where  stream  action  is  absent,  occur  Ulmus  americana,  Ostrya 
virginica,  Prunus  serotina,  Celastrus  scandens  and  Vitis.  Under  the 
cliff  flourish  such  herbaceous  plants  as  Sedum  ternatum,  Pilea  pumila, 
Impatiens,  Equisetum  arvense,  Eupatorium  perfoliatum,  Ambrosia  tri- 
fida,  Stellaria  media,  Galium,  Carex  and  various  mesophytic  mosses.  The 
mesophytic  condition  is  due  largely  to  the  constant  shade. 

The  vegetation  becomes  more  and  more  mesophytic  as  the  cliff  be- 
comes more  overhanging.  On  account  of  the  stability  of  the  limestone, 
this  may  continue  until  the  cliff  overhangs  to  a  surprising  extent,  but 
eventually  overhanging  portions  of  the  cliff  fall  in  large  masses.  This 
process  is  aided  by  the  presence  of  prominent  cleavage  planes  in  two 
series  at  right  angles  to  one  another,  but  neither  parallel  to  the  edge  of 
the  cliff.  The  breaking  off  of  the  large  masses  gives  the  cliff  a  jagged 
appearance.  The  immediate  result  of  the  breaking  off  of  a  portion  of 
the  cliff  is  a  rejuvenation  of  the  succession.  The  mesophytic  vegetation 
beneath  the  overhanging  cliff  is  destroyed,  both  by  being  covered  by  the 
fallen  fragments  and  by  exposure.  Stream  action  on  the  base  of  the  cliff 
is  hindered  or  rendered  impossible  by  the  covering  of  the  soft  underlying 
stratum.  The  stream  is  too  weak  to  remove  or  wear  away  the  fallen 
fragments.  The  fallen  portions  of  the  cliff  eventually  become  covered 
with  vegetation.  The  new,  vertical  faces  of  the  cliff  after  a  longer  period 
are  clothed  with  plants.  Soil  and  humus  accumulate  more  readily  than 
before  the  interstices  of  the  fragments,  giving  better  conditions  for 
the  growth  of  trees.  With  the  increase  of  shade,  more  mesophytic  condi- 
tions prevail. 

Slowly  the  edge  of  the  cliff  and  the  fallen  masses  of  rock  are  crum- 
bled by  action  of  the  weather.  The  result  is  finally  a  gentle  slope  with 
occasional  remnants  of  the  cliff  projecting  through  the  soil.  The  climax 
mesophytic  forest  does  not  occur  here,  though  conditions  approaching  it 
are  found  at  the  lower  end  of  the  gorge.  Tilia  americana,  Robinia 
pseudo-acacia,  Morius  rubra  and  Fraxinus  americana  are  the  principal 
trees,  with  an  undergrowth  of  Sambucus  canadensis  and  such  herbs  as 
Galium,  Poa  pratense,  and  Sedum  ternatum. 

On  the  whole,  it  would  be  difficult  to  find  two  rock-cliff  successions 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


113 

more  different  than  the  two  just  described.  The  differences  become  more 
striking  when  it  is  considered  that  the  two  successions  are  both  on  lime- 
stone, in  the  same  region  and  on  cliffs  extending  in  the  same  general 
direction.  The  principal  differences  are  as  follows:  (1)  The  succession 
on  Hudson  River  limestone  is  more  rapid  than  that  on  Niagara  lime- 
stone. (2)  There  is  a  striking  contrast  in  the  pioneer  stages.  The 
pioneer  association  on  Hudson  River  limestone  is  characterized  by  the 
complete  absence  of  lichens,  liverworts,  xerophytic  mosses  and  ferns,  all 
of  which  are  prominent  on  Niagara  limestone.  (3)  In  the  Whitewater 
Gorge,  the  degradation  of  the  cliffs  of  Hudson  River  limestone  is  accom- 
plished by  the  crumbling  of  the  rock  into  small  fragments,  while  at  Elk- 
horn  Falls  the  fragments  of  Niagara  limestone  are  of  many  tons'  weight. 
(4)  On  account  of  the  overhanging  character  of  the  cliff  at  Elkhorn 
Falls,  an  intermediate  mesophytic  stage  is  introduced  into  the  succession. 


8—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


i 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


115 
Notes  on  Microscopic  Technique. 


M.  S.  Markle,  Earlham  College. 


During  the  past  few  years  I  have  been  using  very  successfully  a 
method  of  staining  a  number  of  slides  at  one  time,  a  description  of  whicn 
may  be  of  interest  to  others  who  have  occasion  to  prepare  large  nxmibers 
of  slides  for  class  use  or  for  research.  The  principal  features  of  the 
method  were  suggested  to  me  by  Miss  Louise  Sawyer  of  the  Department 
of  Biology  of  Beloit  College. 

As  shown  in  the  illustration,  the  slides  are  held  between  the  soils  of 
a  brass  spring  about  an  inch  in  diameter,  made  of  No.  13  wire  and  wound 
with  the  coils  in  contact.  By  holding  the  spring  in  the  left  hand  and 
forcing  the  first  two  coils  apart  with  the  thumb  nail,  the  first  slide  may 
be  inserted.  After  this,  pressure  applied  by  the  thxmib  upon  the  slide 
just  inserted  separated  the  coils  for  the  reception  of  the  next  slide. 

As  staining  jars,  I  am  now  using  Bausch  and  Lomb  preservation 
jars  No.  15166  holding  600  c.c,  but  Stender  dishes  about  100  mm.  deep 
might  prove  to  be  more  satisfactory.  Vessels  to  contain  stains  in  which 
the  slides  rest  for  a  time  (such  as  safrannin)  are  more  economical  of 
stain  if  larger. 

A  coil  long  enough  to  hold  12  to  15  slides  has  been  found  to  be 
most  satisfactory.  The  spring  is  kept  uppermost  until  the  final  xylol  is 
reached,  when  the  spring  is  reversed,  allowing  the  slides  to  be  pulled  out 
one  at  a  time  for  mounting.  It  is  easy  to  hold  the  rest  of  the  slides  with 
one  hand  while  removing  a  slide  with  the  other. 

The  spring  I  am  using  was  made  by  Orr  and  Lockitt,  Chicago;  a 
spring  about  18  inches  long  cost  65  cents  at  that  time.  Any  hardware 
dealer  ought  to  be  able  to  obtain  such  a  spring. 

I  have  found  it  desirable  to  use  3  jars  of  95  per  cent,  alcohol  as  well 
as  3  jars  of  xylol  in  the  series  of  reagents  through  which  the  slides  are 
run.  As  the  alcohol  becomes  loaded  with  stain  or  water,  the  lowest 
grade  is  discarded,  each  of  the  others  is  reduced  one  grade  and  the 
third  jar  refilled  with  pure  alcohol.  The  same  scheme  is  used  for  xylol. 
By  this  means,  one  always  has  one  vessel  of  pure  reagent.  Economy  of 
reagents  and  efficiency  of  work  are  facilitated. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


116 

Balsam  may  be  kept  from  spreading  beyond  the  cover-glass  and  leav- 
ing a  halo  on  the  finished  slide  by  wiping  off  the  slide  with  an  absorbent 
cloth  close  to  the  sections  before  putting  on  the  cover-glass.  The  balsam 
will  then  spread  to  the  edge  of  the  cover-glass  and  stop. 

A  small  amount  of  valuable  material  may  be  made  to  serve  for  a 
larger  number  of  slides,  smaller  covers  may  be  used,  sections  may  be 
Better  oriented  and  worthless  sections  discarded  if  sections  are  examined 
just  after  the  paraffin  ribbons  are  stretched.  Desirable  sections  may  be 
cut  out  by  rocking  a  round-edged  scalpel.  By  laying  a  new  slide  smeared 
with  fixative  on  the  table  in  close  contact  with  the  original  slide,  the  sec- 
tions may  be  transferred  to  the  new  slide  with  the  point  of  a  scalpel, 
after  adding  a  few  drops  of  water  to  facilitate  the  moving  of  the  sections. 
The  sections  may  be  more  easily  examined  while  in  the  paraffin  if  a  little 
Magdala  red  is  added  to  one  of  the  higher  alcohols  in  which  the  material 
is  dehydrated  .previous  to  imbedding.  The  small  amount  of  stain  ab- 
sorbed will  not  affect  future  staining  operations. 

Female  gametophytes  in  pine  ovules  usually  shrink  greatly  when 
fixed  and  imbedded.  This  may  be  almost  entirely  obviated  by  cutting 
a  slab  off  each  side  of  the  ovule  before  it  is  fixed.  A  Gillette  razor 
blade  is  very  satisfactory,  since  on  account  of  its  thinness  it  does  not 
crush  the  material. 

Seeds  of  the  pinyon  pine  (Pinus  edulis)  are  very  satisfactory  to 
illustrate  the  grross  anatomy  of  the  gymnosperm  seed,  since  they  are 
very  large  and  easily  dissected.  The  gametophjrte  and  contained  embryos 
or  the  embryos  alone  may  be  dissected  out,  soaked  in  water  a  short  time, 
fixed  and  imbedded.    They  cut  very  easily. 

A  modification  of  Land's  Fixative  (See  Botanical  Gazette,  Vol.  LIX, 
page  397),  has  been  used  very  successfully  for  refractory  sections  that 
will  not  adhere  readily  with  egg  albumen.  Land's  fixative  dries  very 
quickly,  causing  the  liquid  added  to  float  the  sections  to  spread  with 
difficulty.  By  using  the  following  formula,  the  liquid  spreads  as  easily 
as  with  egg  albumen: 

2%  gum  arabic  in  water 50  c.  c 

Glycerin    50  c.  c. 

Sodiimi  salicylate 1  gram. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


117 

Use  as  egg  albumen.  Float  sections  on  water  slightly  yellow  with 
potassium  dichromate.  Stretch  over  warm  plate.  Melting  the  paraffin 
does  not  impair  the  efficiency  of  the  fixative.  When  aqueous  stains  are 
used,  no  previous  treatment  is  necessary;  but  when  alcoholic  stains  only 
are  to  be  used,  it  is  best  to  set  the  slides  for  a  short  time  in  water  to 
dissolve  the  excess  of  fixative  adhering  to  the  slide.  Otherwise  this 
precipitate  will  take  the  stain  and  spoil  the  appearance  of  the  slide. 


Method  of  holding  microscopic  slides  in  brass  springs  for  staining. 

This  is  best  done  before  the  paraffin  is  removed  from  the  slides.     The 
slides  should  be  re-dried. 

A  hot-plate  for  stretching  paraffin  ribbons  that  is  a  great  improve- 
ment over  the  old  copper  plate  and  gas  fiame  may  be  made  by  putting 
an  incandescent  lamp  in  a  box  and  making  a  glass  lid.  The  heat  is 
uniform.  The  glass  plate  gives  better  contact,  though  it  is  better  to  fill 
the  space  between  the  slide  and  the  glass  lid  by  putting  a  drop  of  water 
on  the  lid  before  placing  the  slide  on  it.  A  small  box  may  be  made  of 
an  ordinary  chalk  box,  the  sliding  lid  of  which  is  replaced  by  a  dis- 
carded photographic  plate  or  other  piece  of  glass.  It  is  easier  to  remove 
the  slides,  however,  if  the  lid  is  flush  with  the  sides  of  the  box. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


119 


The  Ustilaginales  op  Indiana. 

H.  S.  Jackson — Purdue  University. 


The  following  list  of  the  Ustilaginales  or  "smuts"  of  Indiana  is 
based  primarily  on  the  material  in  the  writer's  herbarium  and  in  that 
of  the  Purdue  University  Agricultural  Experiment  Station.  All  of  the 
Indiana  material  in  the  herbarium  of  the  New  York  Botanical  Garden 
has  also  been  included,  most  of  the  specimens  deposited  there  being  col- 
lections made  in  Indiana  by  Dr.  L.  M.  Underwood  during  the  period 
when  he  was  connected  with  DePauw  University.  The  only  previous 
lists  of  the  smuts  of  Indiana  were  included  in  the  List  of  Cryptogams 
prepared  by  Dr.  Underwood,  which  appeared  in  the  Proceedings  of  the 
Indiana  Academy  for  1893,  and  in  the  Supplementary  list  of  1894.  A 
total  of  sixteen  species  were  recorded.  A  few  other  scattered  records 
appear  in  the  literature,  several  having  been  made  in  the  various  lists 
of  the  Fungi  of  Indiana,  by  Prof.  J.  M.  VanHook,  which  have  been 
published  in  the  Proceedings  at  various  times.  No  attempt  has  been 
made  to  include  all  the  localities  recorded  for  the  more  common  species. 
In  general  only  those  specimens  are  listed  which  the  writer  has  had  an 
opportunity  to  examine.  Several  species  are  included,  however,  which 
are  based  on  the  distribution  records  in  the  monograph  of  the  Ustilag- 
inales by  Dr.  G.  P.  Clinton,  published  in  the  North  American  Flora 
Vol.  7,  pt.  1,  1906. 

The  present  list  includes  a  total  of  forty-seven  species  on  as  many 
hosts.  A  large  number  of  other  species  undoubtedly  occur  in  our  range. 
The  writer  would  greatly  appreciate  it  if  collectors  would  furnish  dupli- 
cates of  specimens  not  recorded  here,  or  which  they  may  collect  in  the 
future,  for  use  in  preparing  a  supplementary  list. 

Acknowledgment  is  gratefully  made  to  all  those  who  have  fur- 
nished specimens  for  study  or  who  have  assisted  in  any  way  in  the 
preparation  of  the  list. 


*  Contribution  from  the  Botanical  Department  of  the  Purdue  University  Aflrricultura] 
Experiment  Station. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


120 

USTILAGINACEAE. 

1.  Cintractia  Caricis  (Pers.)  Magn.  Abh.  Bot.  Ver.  Prov.  Brand.  37:79. 

1896. 

Uredo  Caricis  Pers.  Syn.  Fung.  225.     1801. 

On  Cyperaceae: 

Carex  umbellata  Schk.,  beech  woods,  *^  mile  S.  W.  Chestnut  Ridge, 
May  11,  1913,  C.  C.  Deam  127116. 

This  species  has  a  wide  distribution  in  America  as  well  as  in  other 
parts  of  the  world  where  Carex  species  are  native.  It  should  be  found 
on  other  host  species  in  Indiana.  The  sori  occur  in  the  ovaries  and 
when  mature  are  rather  conspicuous  subspherical  bodies  3-4  mm.  in 
diameter. 

2.  Cintractia  Junci  (Schw.)  Trel.  Bull.  Torrey  Club  12:70.    1885. 

Caeoma  Junci  Schw.  Trans.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  II.  4:290.    1832. 

On  Juncaceae: 

JunciLs  diffusissimus  Buckley,  Versailles,  Ripley  County,  June  18, 
1915,  C.  C.  Deam  16087. 

Juncus  tenuis  Willd.,  Reynolds,  White  County,  Aug^ust  2,  1916,  G.  A. 
Osner. 

3.  Cintractia  Luzulae  (Sacc.)  Clinton,  Jour.  Myc.  8:143.    1902. 

Ustilago  Luzulae  Sacc.  Myc.  Ven.  Spec.  73.    1873. 

On  Juncaceae: 

Juncoides  campestre  (L.)  Kuntze,  Greensburg,  Decatur  County, 
May  10,  1889,  J.  C.  Arthur;  Terre  Haute,  Vigo  County,  May  12,  1917, 
C.  C.  Deam  22959;  Kramer,  Warren  County,  May  18,  1917,  C.  C.  Deam 
23104;  Salem,  Washington  County,  C.  C.  Deam  23194. 

Previously  known  from  North  America  only  from  the  one  collection 
made  in  1889  by  Dr.  Arthur  at  Greensburg,  Ind.  The  sori  are  in  the 
ovaries  but  are  inconspicuous  and  hence  easily  overlooked.  The  species 
is  doubtless  of  much  wider  distribution  in  this  State  than  the  above 
collections  would  indicate. 

4.  Cintractia  Montagnei   (Tul.)   Magn.  Abh.  Bot.  Ver.  Prov.  Brand. 

37:79.    1896. 

Ustilago  Montagnei  Tul.  Ann.  Sci.  Nat.  III.  7:88.    1847. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


121 

On  Cyperaceae: 

Rynchospora  glomerata  (L.)  VahL,  Michigan  City,  Laporte  County, 
September  13,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson  and  E.  B.  Mains. 

5.  Melanopsichium  austro-americanum   (Speg.)   G.  Beck,  Ann.  Nat. 

Hofmus.  Wien  9:122.    1894. 

Ustilago  austro-americana  Speg.  Anal.  Soc.  Ci.  Argent.  12:63. 
1881. 
On  Polygonaceae: 

Persicaria  pennsylvanica  (L.)  Small,  Plymouth,  Marshall  County, 
September  5,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson. 

A  species  causing  conspicuous  hard  black  sori  in  the  infloresence. 

6.  Schizonella  melanogramma   (DC.)    Schrot.  Beitr.  Biol.  Pfl.  2:352 

1877. 

Uredo  melanogramma  DC.  Fl.  Fr.  6:75.    1815. 

On  Cyperaceae: 

Carex  pennsylvanica  Lam.,  Shades,  Montgomery  County,  May  16, 
1913,  F.  D.  Kern;  Happy  Hollow,  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  May  3, 
1906,  G.  W.  Wilson  5485;  Battle  Ground,  Tippecanoe  County,  June  18, 
1916,  Evelyn  Allison;  Rochester,  Fulton  County,  May,  1894,  L.  M.  Un- 
derwood, Ind.  Biol.  Sur.  10,  May  17,  1894,  J.  C.  Arthur;  Pine  Creek, 
Warren  County,  May  5,  1917,  G.  N.  Hoffer. 

Carex  picta  Steud.,  Bloomington,  Monroe  County,  May  25,  1917,  J. 
M.  VanHook  3746,  June  9,  1917,  C.  C.  Deam  23569;  Brown  County, 
June  16,  1912,  C.  C.  Deam. 

A  very  conmion  species,  occurring  on  the  leaves,  forming  epiphyllous 
linear  black  sori,  which  superficially  resemble  those  of  a  rust. 

7.  Sorosporium  confusum  Jackson  Bull.  Torrey  Club  35:148.     1908. 
On  Poaceae: 

Aristida  sp.,  Elberfeld,  Warrick  County,  October  4,  1916,  H.  S. 
Jackson. 

An  inconspicuous  species  the  sori  of  which  occur  in  the  ovaries, 
which  remain  enclosed  in  the  glumes.  This  species  was  formerly  con- 
fused with  S.  Ellisii,  which  is  now  interpreted  as  occurring  only  on 
Andropogon. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


122 

8.  SoROSPORiUM  Syntherismae  (Peck)  Farl.;  Farl.  &  Seynu  Host  Index 

N.  Am.  Fungi  152.     1891. 

Ustilago  Syntherismae  Peck,  Ann.  Rep.  N.  Y.  State  Mus.  27:103. 
1875. 

On  Poaceae: 

Cenchrus  carolinianus  Walt.,  Michigan  City,  Laporte  County,  Sep- 
tember 13,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson  and  E.  B.  Mains,  Greencastle,  Putnam 
County,  October,  1892,  L.  M.  Underwood,  Ind.  Biol.  Sur.  6;  Dayton, 
Tippecanoe  County,  November,  1917,  H.  S.  Jackson. 

Panicum  dichotomiflorum  Michx.,  Muncie,  Delaware  County,  Sep- 
tember 29,  1915,  H.  S.  Jackson;  Hammond,  Lake  County,  October  14, 

1914,  F.  J.  Pipal. 

The  sori  of  this  species  as  a  rule  cause  the  abortion  of  the  entire 
infioresence. 

9.  Sphacelotheca  Sorghi  (Link)  Clinton,  Jour.  Myc.  8:140.    1902. 

Sporisorium  Sorghi  Link,  in  Willd.  Sp.  PL  6':86.    1825. 
On  Poaceae: 
Sorghum  vulgare  Pers.  Muncie,  Delaware  County,  September  29, 

1915,  H.  S.  Jackson;  West  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  September 
18,  1912,  E.  J.  Petry,  September  20,  1917,  G.  A.  Osner,  September,  1915, 
H.  S.  Jackson. 

This,  the  kernel  smut  of  sorghum,  is  evidently  quite  common.  The 
head  smut  *S.  Reilana,  which  generally  involves  the  whole  inflorescence, 
has  not  yet  been  collected  in  Indiana. 

10.  Ustilago  anomala  J.  Kunze,  Wint.  in  Rab.  Krypt.  Fl.  IMOO.  1881. 
On  Polygonaceae: 

Tiniaria  acandens  (L.)  Small,  Fern,  Putnam  County,  September, 
1893,  L.  M.  Underwood,  Ind.  Biol.  Sur.  1;  Crawfordsville,  Montgomery 
County,  September  20,  1908,  V.  B.  Stewart  8. 

11.  Ustilago  Avenae  (Pers.)  Jens.  Charb.  C^r^ales  4:1889. 

Uredo  segetum  Avenae  Pers.  Tent.  Disp.  Fung.  57.    1897. 

On  Poaceae: 

Avena  sativa  L.,  Greencastle,  Putnam  County,  June  1893,  L.  M. 
Underwood;  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  1893;  J.  C.  Arthur  (Und. 
Ind.  Biol.  Surv.  2) ;  West  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  June  10,  1M8, 
F.  D.  Kern,  June  25,  1916,  J.  C.  Summers;  Holman,  Dearborn  County, 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


123 

1889  (?),  H.  L.  Bolley;  Crawfordsville,  Montgromery  County,  June  1892, 
E.  W.  Olive;  Plymouth,  Marshall  County,  June  29,  1916,  G.  A.  Osner; 
Surrey,  Jasper  County,  July  10,  1917,  Chas.  Chupp;  South  Bend,  St. 
Joseph  County,  October  28,  1916,  M.  C.  Gillis;  Oaktown,  Sullivan  County, 
June  25,  1916,  J.  C.  Summers;  Lebanon,  Boone  County,  July  17,  1916, 
P.  S.  Lowe;  Griffiths,  Lake  County,  July  27,  1916,  G.  A.  Osner. 

12.  USTILAGO    Calamagrostidis    (Fuckel)    Clinton,   Jour.    Myc.    8:138. 

1902. 

Tilletia  Calamagrostis  Fuckel,  Symb.  Myc.  40.    1869. 
On  Poaceae: 

Calamagrostis  canadensis  (Michx.)  Beauv.,  Plymouth,  Marshall 
County,  June  21,  1916,  G.  A.  Osner. 

Evidently  a  rather  rare  species,  but  having  a  wide  distribution. 
The  sori  occur  on  the  leaves  and  sheaths  and  in  general  features  the 
species  resembles  U,  Striae formis. 

13.  USTILAGO  Crameri  Kom. ;  Fuckel,  Jahr.  Nass..Ver.  Nat.  27-28:11. 

1873. 
On  Poaceae: 

Chaetocfdoa  italica  (L.)  Scribn.,  West  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe 
County,  September  14,  1915,  H.  S.  Jackson. 

14.  USTILAGO  HORDEI  (Pers.)  Kellerm.  &  Swingle,  Ann.  Rep.  Kans.  Agr. 

Exp.  Sta.  2:268.    1890. 

Uredo  segetum  Hordei  Pers.  Tent.  Disp.  Fung.  57.    1797. 
On  Poaceae: 

Hordeum  vulgare  L.,  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  July  2,  1891, 
J.  C.  Arthur;  Auburn,  Dekalb  County,  July  19,  1917,  F.  J.  Pipal. 

This  is  the  so-called  covered  smut  of  barley.  It  is  undoubtedly 
much  more  common  than  the  above  listed  collections  would  indicate. 

15.  USTILAGO  LEVIS  (Kell.  &  Sw.)  Magn.  Abh.  Bot.  Ver.  Prov.  Brand. 

37:69.       1896. 

Ustilago  Avenae  levis  Kell.  &  Sw.  Ann.  Rep.  Kans.  Agr.  Exp. 
Sta.  2:259.     1890. 
On  Poaceae: 

Avena  sativa  L.,  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  June  1890,  J.  C. 
Arthur,  June  26,  1915,  C.  A.  Ludwig   (Barth.  Fungi  Columb.  4795) ; 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


124 

Griffiths,  Lake  County,  July  27,  1916,  G.  A.  Osner;  Greencastle,  Putnam 
County,  June  1893,  L.  M.  Underwood;  Lebanon,  Boone  County,  July  25, 
1916,  P.  S.  Lowe;  North  Liberty,  St.  Joseph  County,  August  9,  1916, 
G.  A.  Osner. 

16.  USTILAGO  NEGLECTA  Niessl,  Rab.  Fungi  Eur.  1200.    1868. 

Erysibe  Panicorum  Panici-glauci  Wallr.  Fl.  Crypt.  Germ.  2:216. 

1833. 
Ustilago  Panici-glauci  Wint.;  Rab.  Krypt.  Fl.  r:97.     1881. 
On  Poaceae: 

Chaetochloa  glauca  (L.)  Scribn.,  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County, 
1893,  J.  C.  Arthur  (Und.  Ind.  Biol.  Surv.  3) ;  West  Lafayette,  Tippe- 
canoe County,  September  24,  1915,  H.  S.  Jackson;  Middletown,  Henry 
County,  September  30,  1915,  H.  S.  Jackson;  Argos,  Marshall  County, 
September  26,  1916,  G.  A.  Osner. 

17.  Ustilago  nuda  (Jens.)  Kell.  &  Sw.  Ann.  Rep.  Kans.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta. 

2:277.    1890. 

Ustilago  HoYdei  nuda  Jens.  Charb.  C^r^ales  4.    1889. 

On  Poaceae: 

Hordeum  vulgarc  L.,  Manchester,  Dearborn  County,  June  20,  1889, 
H.  L.  Bolley;  Griffith,  Lake  County,  July  27,  1916,  G.  A.  Osner;  Lafay- 
ette, Tippecanoe  County,  July  2,  1891,  J.  C.  Arthur,  June  22,  1917,  H.  S. 
Jackson;  Fremont,  Steuben  County,  June  27,  1910,  0.  S.  Roberts;  Au- 
burn, Dekalb  County,  July  19,  1917,  F.  J.  Pipal. 

This,  the  loose  smut  of  barley,  is  everywhere  common  and  causes  con- 
siderable loss  each  year.  A  collection  made  in  the  greenhouse  showed 
infection  on  the  sheaths  and  leaves  as  well  as  the  infloresence. 

1§.    Ustilago  perennans  Rostr.  Overs.  K.  Danske  Vid.   Selsk.  Forh. 
1890:15.     Mr.  1890. 

Cintractia  Avenae  Ellis  &  Tracy,  Jour.  Myc.  6:77.  S.  1890. 
On  Poaceae: 

ArrhenatheruTti  elatius  (L.)  Beauv.,  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County, 
June  10,  1897,  Wm.  Stuart. 

19.    Ustilago  pustulata  Tracy  &  Earle,  Bull.  Torrey  Club  22:175.  1895. 

On  Poaceae: 

Panicufn  dichotomiflorum  Michx.,  Evansville,  Vanderburgh  County, 
October  4,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


125 

20.  USTILAGO  Rabenhorstiana  Kuhn.  Hedwigia  15:4.     1876. 
On  Poaceae: 

Syntherisma  sanguinale  (L.)  Dulac,  Greencastle,  Putnam  County, 
October  1892,  L.  M.  Underwood,  Ind.  Biol.  Surv.  5;  Oakland  City,  Gib- 
son County,  October  5,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson;  Michigan  City,  Laporte 
County,  September  13,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson  and  E.  B.  Mains;  Lafayette, 
Tippecanoe  County,  September  11,  1891,  J.  C.  Arthur;  West  Lafayette, 
Tippecanoe  County,  September  3,  19,  1915,  H.  S.  Jackson;  Paoli,  Orange 
County,  September  27,  1915,  H.  S.  Jackson;  Marion,  Grant  County, 
October  11,  1915,  F.  J.  Pipal;  Plymouth,  Marshall  County,  September 
12,  27,  1916,  G.  A.  Osner;  Goshen,  Elkhart  Co.,  October  10,  1916,  G.  A. 
Osner;  Evansville,  Vanderburgh  County,  October  4,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson. 

Perhaps  the  most  common,  at  least  the  most  frequently  collected 
smut  occurring  on  a  native  grass  in  our  region.  The  entire  infloresence 
IS  usually  affected. 

21.  USTILAGO  SPERMOPHORA  B.  &  C.  Sacc.  Syll.  Fung.  7':466.     1888. 
On  Poaceae: 

Eragrostis  major  Host.,  Middletown,  Henry  County,  September  30, 
1915,  H.  S.  Jackson. 

An  inconspicuous  but  probably  not  uncommon  species. 

22.  USTILAGO  sphaerogena  BurriU,  Sacc.  Syll.  Fung.  7':468.    1888. 
On  Poaceae: 

Echinochloa  Crus-galli  (L.)  Beauv.,  Blooming  Grove,  Franklin 
County,  September  7, 1913,  C.  A.  Ludwig;  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County, 
October  5,  1909,  A.  G.  Johnson,  October  1,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson. 

23.  USTILAGO  Tritici  (Pers.)  Rostr.  Overs.  K.  Danske  Vid.  Selsk.  Forh. 

1890:15.    Mr.  1890. 

Uredo  segetum  Tritici  Pers.  Tent.  Disp.  Fung.  57.     1797. 

On  Poaceae: 

Triticum  vulgar e  (collective),  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  1893, 
J.  C.  Arthur  (Und.  Ind.  Biol.  Surv.  4),  June  20,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson; 
Greencastle,  Putnam  County,  June  1893,  L.  M.  Underwood;  Brown 
County,  May  1893,  L.  M.  Underwood;  Crawfordsville,  Montgomery 
County,  June  1892,  M.  B.  Thomas;  Wabash  County,  June  20,  1888,  A. 
Miller  18;  Plymouth,  Marshall  County,  June  29,  1916,  G.  A.  Osner; 
Petersburg,  Pike  Co.,  October  18,  1910,  Blake  A.  Lamb;  Mt.  Vernon, 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


126 

Posey  County,  May  14,  1910,  A.  G.  Johnson;  Franklin  County,  July  1, 
1912,  C.  A.  Ludwig;  Claypool,  Kosciusko  County,  June  11,  1916,  R.  C. 
Hathaway. 

The  loose  smut  of  wheat  is  undoubtedly  present  in  all  counties  of 
the  State  and  is  estimated  to  cause  a  reduction  in  yield  of  3-4  per  cent 
for  the  State.  This  means  that  from  one  to  one  and  one-quarter  million 
bushels  are  lost  annually  from  this  disease. 

24.  USTILAGO  STRlAEFORMis   (Westend.)   Niessl,  Hedwigia  15:1.     1876. 

Uredo  striae formis  Westend.  Bull.  Acad.  Roy.  Belg.  18'; 406. 
1851. 

On  ^oaceae: 

Agrostis  alba  vulgaris  (With.)  Thurb.,  Plymouth,  Marshall  County, 
June  22,  1916,  G.  A.  Osner;  Brazil,  Clay  County,  June  22,  1917,  G.  A. 
Osner. 

Phleum  pratense  L.,  Greencastle,  Putnam  County,  May  1893,  L.  M. 
Underwood,  Ind.  Biol.  Surv.  9;  Plymouth,  Marshall  County,  June  22, 
1916,  G.  A.  Osner;  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  June  24,  1898,  Wm. 
Stuart;  Monroeville,  Morgan  County,  July  28,  1917,  G.  A.  Osner. 

Poa  pratensis  L.,  Plymouth,  Marshall  County,  June  21,  29,  1916, 
G.  A.  Osner. 

25.  USTILAGO  UTRICULOSA  (Nees)  Tul.  Ann.  Sci.  Nat.  III.  7:102.    1847. 

Caeoma  utriculosa  Nees,  Syst.  Pilze  1:14.    1817. 

On  Polygonaceae: 

Persicaria  amphibii  (L.)  S.  F.  Gray,  Wabash  County,  October  16, 
1890,  A.  Miller  10. 

Persicaria  pennsylvanica  (L.)  Small,  Michigan  City,  Laporte 
County,  September  13,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson  and  E.  B.  Mains;  Lafayette, 
Tippecanoe  County,  October  3,  1915,  H.  S.  Jackson;  Munde,  Delaware 
County,  September  29,  1915,  H.  S.  Jackson;  Plymouth,  Marshall  County, 
September  5,  1916,  G.  A.  Osner,  September  5,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson;  Oak- 
land City,  Gibson  County,  October  5,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson. 

26.  USTILAGO  ViLFAE  Wint.  Bull.  Torrey  Club  10:7.    1883. 
On  Poaceae: 

SporoboltLs  neglectus  Nash,  West  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County, 
October  23,  1912,  E.  J.  Petry. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


127 

27.  USTILAGO  Zeae  (Beckm.)  Unger,  Einfl.  Bodens  211.    1836. 

Lycoperdon  Zeae  Beckm.  Haimov.  Mag.  6:1330.     1768. 
Uredo  Zeae  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:71.     1822. 

On  Poaceae: 

Eucklaena  mexicana  Schrad.,  Bloomington,  Monroe  County,  Sum- 
mer 1917,  P.  Weatherwax. 

Zea  Mays  L.,  Greencastle,  Putnam  County,  October  1893,  L.  M.  Un- 
derwood, Ind.  Biol.  Surv.  7;  Plymouth,  Marshall  County,  September  5, 
1916,  H.  S.  Jackson;  Lebanon,  Boone  County,  August  1,  1916,  P.  S. 
Lowe;  Grovertown,  Starke  County,  August  22,  1917,  C.  R.  Hoflfer;  La- 
fayette, Tippecanoe  County,  September  1,  1917,  G.  A.  Osner. 

The  common  com  smut  is  known  in  every  county  of  the  State.  Only 
a  few  localities  are  listed,  which  include  those  from  which  specimens 
are  preserved. 

28.  USTILAGO  sp. 

On  Poaceae: 

Secale  cereale  L,,  Bainbridge,  Putnam  County,  June  1917,  G.  A. 
Osner;  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  June  5,  1917,  G.  A.  Osner;  Sur- 
rey, Jasper  County,  July  10,  1917,  Chas.  Chupp. 

A  loose  smut  of  rye,  indistinguishable  in  its  morphological  charac- 
ters from  the  loose  smut  of  wheat,  U.  Tritici,  has  been  found  in  three 
fields  in  Indiana.  Usually  only  a  portion  of  the  florets  are  infected. 
The  exact  status  of  this  smut  must  remain  in  doubt  till  infection  work 
has  been  conducted. 

TILLETIACEAE. 

29.  DOASSANSIA  DEFORMANS  Setch.  Proc.  Am.  Acad.  26:17.     1891. 
On  Alismaceae: 

Sagittwria  latifolia  Willd.,  Michigan  City,  Laporte  County,  Septem- 
ber 13,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson  and  E.  B.  Mains. 

This  species  causes  considerable  distortion  of  the  affected  parts. 
The  collection  recorded  above  consisted  in  the  main  of  a  distorted  flower 
stalk. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


128 

30.  DOASSANSIA  OPACA  Setch.  Proc.  Am.  Acad.  26:15.     1891. 
On  Alismaceae: 

Sagittaria  latifolia  Willd.,  Winona  Lake,  Kosciusko  County,  Augrust 

31,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson  and  G.  N.  Hoffer. 

This  species  forms  opaque  spore  balls  in  the  mesophyll  of  the  leaf 
causing  considerable  thickening. 

31.  Entyloma  australe  Speg.  Anal.  Soc.  Ci.  Argent.  10:5.     1880. 
On  Solanacbae: 

Phy salts  pubescens  L.,  Greencastle,  Putnam  County,  October  1893, 
L.  M.  Underwood,  Ind.  Biol.  Surv.  8. 

Physalis  subglabrata  Mackensie  and  Bush,  Urmeyville,  Johnson 
County,  November  1890,  E.  M.  Fisher  816. 

32.  Entyloma  crastophilum  S^acc.  Michelia  1:540.    1879. 
On  Poaceae: 

Muhlenbergia  mexicana  (L.)  Trin.,  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County, 
November  11,  1916,  E.  B.  Mains. 

This  collection  is  referred  to  this  species  somewhat  doubtfully.  We 
have  seen  no  other  record  of  a  species  of  Entyloma  on  this  host  species. 

33.  Entyloma  compositarum  Farl.  Bot.  Gaz.  8:275.    1883. 
On  Ambrosiaceae: 

Ambrosia  elatior  L.  (A.  art emisiae folia  L.),  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe 
County,  July  2,  1889,  J.  C.  Arthur. 

On  Carduaceae: 

Senecio  aureus  L.,  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  May  22,  1916,  H. 
S.  Jackson. 

34.  Entyloma  Floerkeae  Holway;  Davis,  Trans.  Wise  Acad.  11:170. 

1897. 

On  Limnanthaceae: 

Floerkea  proserpinacoides  Willd.,  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County, 
May  8,  1898,  J.  C.  Arthur. 

A  rather  rare  species  reported  otherwise  only  from  Illinois,  Ohio 
and  Wisconsin.    The  writer  has  also  collected  it  in  Delaware. 

35.  Entyloma  Lobeliae  Farl.  Bot.  Gaz.  8:275.    1883. 
On  Lobellvceae: 

Lobelia  inflata  L.,  Blooming^ton,  Monroe  County,  Campus  Indiana 
Univ.,  October  26,  1915,  J.  M.  VanHook  3664. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


129 

36.  Entyloma  microsporum    (Ung.)    Schrot.;   Rab.  Fungi  Eur.  1872. 

1874. 

Protomyces  microsporus  Ung.,  Exanth.  Pfl.  343.    1833. 
On  Ranunculaceae: 

Ranunculus  septentrionalis  Poir,  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  May 
17,  1883,  J.  C.  Arthur,  May  29,  1894,  K.  E.  Golden,  May  1,  1906,  G.  W. 
Wilson  5473,  October  29,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson. 

37.  Entyloma  polysporum   (Peck)   Farl.  Bot.  Gaz.  8:275.     1883. 

Protomyces  polysporus  Peck;  Thiim.  Myc.  Univ.  1813.     1881. 
On  Ambrosiaceae: 

Ambrosia  elatior  L.     (A.  art emisae folia  L.). 
Reported  on  the  above  host  from  Indiana  by  Clinton  (N.  A.  Flora 
7:62.    1906).    We  have  not  seen  specimens. 

38.  Entyloma  Saniculae  Peck,  Ann.  Rep.  N.  Y.  State  Mus.  38:100. 

1885. 
On  Ammiaceae: 

Sanicula  sp.,  Greencastle,  Putnam  County,  May  1893,  L.  M.  Under- 
wood. 

39.  Entyloma  speciosum  Schrot.  &  P.  Henn.  Hedwigia  35:220.     1896. 
On  Poaceae: 

Panicum  dichtomiflonim  Michx.,  Evansville,  Vanderburgh  County, 
October  4,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson. 

Otherwise  reported  on  this  host  (as  P.  proliferum)  from  North 
America  only  from  Illinois.  The  specimen  recorded  above  was  obtained 
from  the  same  plants  on  which  Ustilago  pustulata  was  collected. 

40.  Entyloma  Veronicas  (Wint.)  Lagerh.,  Pat.  &  Lagerh.  Bull.  Soc. 

Myc.  Fr.  7:170.     1891. 
Entyloma  Linariae   Veronicae   Wint;    Rab.-Wint.   Fungi   Eur. 
3001.     1884. 
On  Scropularlaceae: 

Veronica  perigrina  L.,  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  April  18, 1916, 
May  6,  19,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson;  Mt.  Vernon,  Posey  County,  May  11, 
1916,  H.  S.  Jackson. 

A  very  common  species  in  the  vicinity  of  Lafayette,  causing  yellow- 
ish or  whitish  well  defined  spots  on  the  leaves. 

9—11994  ♦ 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


130 

41.  TiLLETiA  LAEVis  Kuhii;  Rab.  Fungi  Eur.  1697.    1873. 

Ustilago  foetens  B.  &  C.  Grevillea,  3:59.    1874. 

On  Poaceae: 

Triticum  vulgare  (collective),  Haw  Patch,  July  17,  1889;  Jonesboro, 
Grant  County,  July  30,  1910,  Neill  and  VanHook;  Fort  Wayne,  Allen 
County,  July  21,  1910,  O.  S.  Roberts;  Franklin,  Johnson  County,  July 
5,  1909,  Comm.  E.  A.  Feight;  New  Carlisle,  St.  Joseph  County,  July  10, 
1917,  G.  A.  Osner. 

This,  the  "stinking  smut"  or  "bunt"  of  wheat,  is  much  more  wide- 
spread in  the  State  than  the  above  distribution  would  indicate. 

42.  TiLLETiA  Tritici  (Bjerk.)  Wint.  Rab.  Krypt.  Fl.  1»:110.     1881. 

Lycoperdon    Tritici   Bjerk.    K.    Sv.    Vet-Acad.    Handl.    36:326. 
1775. 
On  Poaceae: 
Triticum  vulgare  L.,  New  Carlisle,  St.  Joseph  County,  July  10,  1917, 
G.  A.  Osner. 

This  specimen  consists  of  a  single  head  found  mixed  with  the  pre- 
ceding species.  This  species  undoubtedly  occurs  not  infrequently  in  the 
northern  part  of  the  State.  It  is  not  to  be  expected  that  it  is  as  common 
as  T,  laevis  however. 

The  report  of  the  occurrence  in  Indiana  of  T.  Tritici  made  in  the 
Proceeding's  for  1915  (p.  396)  has  been  found  to  have  been  based  on  an 
error  in  determination. 

43.  Urocystis  Agropyri  (Preuss)  Schrot.  Abh.  Schles.  Ges.  Abth.  Nat. 

Med.  1869-72:7.     1870. 

Uredo  Agropyri  Preuss,  in  Sturm,  Deutsh.  Fl.  III.  25:1.    1848. 
On  Poaceae: 

Agropyron  repens  (L.)  Beau  v..  West  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County, 
May  30,  1915,  C.  R.  Orton  and  F.  D.  Fromme. 

Elynvus  virginicua  L.,  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  July  22,  1917, 
E.  B.  Mains. 

44.  Urocystis  Anemones  (Pers.)  Wint.;  Rab.  Kiypt.  Fl.  1*:123.    1881. 

Uredo  Anemones  Pers.  Tent.  Disp.  Fung.  56.    1797. 
On  Ranunculaceae: 

Anemone  virginiana  L.,   Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,   April  24, 
1906,  G.  W.  Wilson. 
t 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


131 

Hepatica  a4mtiloba  DC,  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  May  29, 
1893,  J.  C.  Arthur,  June  29,  1916,  G.  N.  Hoffer. 

45.  Urocystis  cepulae  Frost.  Farl.  Ann.  Rep.  Sec.  Mass.  Board  Ajjrr. 

24.    175.    1877. 
On  Alliaceae: 

Allium  cepa  L. 
Reported  by  Underwood  (Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.  1894:151.  1895),  as 
occurring  on  onions  in  market,  Putnam  County,  December  1893.  Clin- 
ton (N.  Am.  Flora  7:57.  1906),  also  reports  this  from  Indiana.  A  speci- 
men in  the  N.  Y.  Botanical  Garden,  collected  by  Underwood  in  Indiana, 
is  sterile.     The  species  undoubtedly  occurs  in  northern  Indiana. 

46.  Urocystis  Colchici   (Schlecht.)  Rab.  Fungi  Eur.  396.     1861. 

Caeoma  Colchici  Schlecht.  Linnaea  1:241.     1826. 

On  Liliaceae: 

Quamasia  hyacinthina  (Raf.)  Britton,  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe 
County,  May  30,  1907,  F.  Vasku,  May  22,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson,  May  1917, 
G.  N.  Hoffer. 

These  collections  are  referred  here  somewhat  doubtfully.  The 
writer  is  unaware  of  any  record  of  the  occurrence  of  Urocystis  on  this 
host  genus  though  he  has  made  similar  collections  in  Oregon  on  a  western 
member  of  the  genus. 

47.  Urocystis  occulta   (Wallr.)   Rab.;  Klotzsch.  Herb.  Viv.  Myc.  II. 

393.     1856. 

Erysibe  occulta  Wallr.  Fl.  Crypt.  Germ.  2:212.     1833. 
On  Poaceae: 

Secale  cereale  L.,  Plymouth,  Marshall  County,  June  20,  1916,  G.  A. 
Osner;  Avilla,  Noble  County,  June  23,  1908,  H.  H.  Whetzel;  Lafayette, 
Tippecanoe  County,  June  1917,  H.  S.  Jackson;  Brainbridge,  Putnam 
County,  June  27,  1917,  G.  A.  Osner. 

The  flag  smut  of  rye  is  evidently  not  uncommon,  but  usually  causes 
little  damage. 

host  index. 
Agropyron  repens  43.  Allium  cepa  44. 

Agrostis  alba  vulgaris  24.  Ambrosia  artemisiaefolia  33,  37. 

Alismaceae  29,  30.  elatior  33,  37. 

Alliaceae  45.  Ambrosiaceae  33,  37. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


132 


Ammiaceae  38. 
Anemone  virginiana  43. 
Aristida  sp.  7. 
Arrhenatherum  elatius  18. 
Avena  sativa  11,  15. 

Calamagrostis  canadensis  12. 

Carduaceae  33. 

Carex  pennsylvanica  6. 

picta  6. 

umbellata  1. 
Cenchrus  carolinianus  8. 
Chaetochloa  glauca  16. 

italica  13. 
Cyperaceae  1,  4,  6. 

Elymus  virginicus  42. 
Eragrostis  major  21. 
Euchlaena  mexicana  27. 

Floerkea  prosperpinacoides  34. 

Hepatica  acutiloba  44. 
Hordeum  vulgare  14,  17. 

Juncaceae  2,  3. 
J  unco  ides  campestre  3. 
Juncus  dilfusissimus  2. 
tenuis  2. 

Liliaceae  45. 
Limnanthaceae  34. 
Lobelia  inflata  35. 
Lobeliaceae  35. 

Muhlenbergia  mexicana  32. 


Panicum  dichotomiflorum  8,  19,  39. 

proliferum  39. 
Persicaria  amphibii  25. 

pennsylvanica  5,  25. 
Phleum  pratense  24. 
Physalis  pubescens  31. 

subglabrata  31. 
Poa  pratensis  24. 
Poaceae  7,  8,  9,  11,  12,  13,  14,  15, 

16,  17,  18,  19,  20,  21,  22,  23,  24, 

26,  27,  28,  32,  39,  41,  42,  43,  47. 
Polygonaceae  5,  10,  25. 

Quamasia  hyacinthina  4C. 

Ranunculaceae  36,  43. 
Ranunculus  septentrionalis  36. 
Rynchospora  glomerata  4. 

Sagittaria  latifolia  29,  30. 
Sanicula  sp.  38. 
Scrophulariaceae  40. 
Sccale  cereale  28,  47. 
Senecio  aureus  33. 
Solanaceae  31. 
Sorghum  vulgare  9. 
Sporobolus  neglectus  26. 
Syntherisma  sanguinale  20. 

Tiniaria  scandens  10. 
Triticum  vulgare  23,  41,  42. 

Veronica  perigrina  40. 

Zea  Mays  27. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


133 
The  Uredinales  op  Induna  II.' 


H.  S.  Jackson,  Purdue  University. 


The  following  records  of  Indiana  rusts  are  presented  at  this  time 
as  the  first  supplement  to  the  article  by  the  writer  on  "The  Uredinales 
of  Indiana/'  which  was  published  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy 
for  1915.  All  the  unrecorded  species  which  have  come  to  hand  since 
the  publication  of  that  list  are  included,  together  with  a  few  forms 
which  for  one  reason  or  another  were  omitted  at  that  time. 

A  large  number  of  collections  have  been  examined  which  add  many 
new  localities  and  a  number  of  new  hosts  for  previously  recorded 
species.  These  are  not  included  in  the  present  list  but  will  be  recorded 
at  another  time.  The  previous  list  contained  records  of  141  species 
exclusive  of  unconnected  species  of  Aecidium.  The  latter  are  included 
in  the  present  list  and  taken  together  with  other  accessions  brings  the 
number  of  species  known  from  the  State  to  a  total  of  155. 

In  order  to  avoid  making  new  combinations  the  older  and  more  fa- 
miliar nomenclature  is  used. 

The  writer  is  under  great  obligation  to  all  those  who  have  been 
kind  enough  to  furnish  specimens  for  study,  especially  to  Dr.  J.  C. 
Arthur,  Prof.  G.  N.  Hoffer,  Mr.  C.  C.  Deam  and  Mr.  J.  B.  Demaree, 
who  have  placed  their  collections  at  his  disposal. 

UREDINACEAE. 

142.  Melampsora  Euphorbiae-Gerardiana  W.  Miiller,  Centr.  Bakt. 
17*:210.     1906. 

On  Euphorbiaceae: 

Tithymalua  commutatns  (Engelm.)  K.  and  Garcke,  West  of  High 
Lake,  Noble  County,  June  11,  1916,  C.  C.  Deam  20083A;  Wea  Creek, 
S.  W.  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  April  22,  1917,  E.  J.  Petry. 

The  above  are  the  only  collections  of  this  species  from  North 
America  (Mains,  Phytopath.  7:102.    1917). 


*  Contribation    from   the   Botanical    Department  of   the    Purdue   University    Agricul- 
tural Experiment  Station. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


134 

The  second  collection  also  bore  some  Aecidium  TithymalL  Both 
species  develop  the  sori  on  a  diffused  mycelium. 

143.  Uredinopsis  Atkinsonii  Magn.  Hedwigia  43:123.     1904. 
On  Polypodiaceae: 

Dryopteris  thelypetris  (L.)  A.  Gray,  Winona  Lake,  Kosciusko  Coun- 
ty, August  31,  1916,  H.  S.  Jackson  and  G.  N.  Hoffer. 

144.  Uredinopsis  mirabilis  (Pk.)  Magn.  Hedwigia  43:121.     1904. 

Septoria  mirabilis  Pk.  Ann.  Rep.  N.  Y.  State  Mus.  25:87.    1873. 
On  Polypodiaceae: 

Onoclea  sensibilis  L.,  Winona  Lake,  Kosciusko  County,  August  31, 
1916,  H.  S.  Jackson  and  G.  N.  Hoffer. 

PUCCINIACEAE. 

145.  PucciNiA  Acetosae  (Schum.)  Kom.  Hedwigia  15:184.     1876. 

Uredo  Acetosae  Schum.  Enum.  PL  Saell.  2:231.    1803. 
On  Polygon aceae: 
Rumex  a^^etosella  L.,  North  Madison,  Jefferson  County,  May  14, 
1916,  J.  B.  Demaree. 

This  is  the  first  collection  which  we  have  seen  of  this  species  from 
any  inland  state.  It  is  known  otherwise  only  from  Atlantic  coast  states 
and  from  near  the  Pacific  coast  in  Oregon. 

146.  PucciNiA  LYSIMACHIATA  (Lk.)  Kem,  Mycologia  9:215.    1917. 

Aecidium  Lysimuchiae  Schw.  Schrift.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:67. 

1822. 
Puccinia  Limosae  Magn.  Amtl.  'Ber.  Vers.  Deutsch.  Naturf.  u. 
Aerzte  1877:200.     1877. 
On  Primulaceae: 
Naumbergia  thyrsi  flora   (L.)    Duby,  Ligonier,  Noble  County,  June 
18,  1917,  C.  C.  Beam  23665. 

Aecia  only  have  been  collected  in  Indiana.  Uredinia  and  telia  are 
recorded  from  the  eastern  and  middle  western  States  on  various  species 
of  Carex.  No  successful  culture  work  has  been  conducted  in  America, 
the  connection  having  been  established  by  European  authors. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


135 

147.  Uromycbs  HOUSTONIATUS   (Schw.)    Sheldon,  Torreya  9:55.     1909. 

Caeoma  (Aeeidium)  houstoniatum  Schw.  Trans.  Am.  Phil.  Soc. 
II.    4:293.    1832. 
On  Rubiaceae: 

Houstonia  eaerulea  L.,  Bennettsville,  Clarke  County,  May  30,  1917, 
C.  C.  Deam  23260. 

This  species  has  uredinia  and  telia  on  Sisyrinchium  sp.,  culture  work 
having  been  conducted  first  by  Sheldon  (1.  c.)  and  later  confirmed  by 
Arthur  (Mycol.  1:237.  1909).  The  telia  have  not  yet  been  collected  in 
Indiana. 

148.  Uromyces  magnatus  Arth.  Mycologia  9:311.     1917. 

Aecidium  magnatum  Arth.  Bull.  Torrey  Club  28:664.    1901. 
On  C0NVALI4ARIACEAE: 

Polygonatum  biflorum  (Walt.)  Ell.,  Ontario,  Lagrange  County, 
June  17,  1917,  C.  C.  Deam  23642. 

This  aecidium  has  not  before  been  reported  from  Indiana.  It  has 
recently  been  shown  by  Arthur  (1.  c.)  to  be  connected  with  uredinia 
and  telia  on  Spartina  formerly  included  with  Uromyces  acuminatus 
Arth.  (Nigredo  Polemanii  (Pk.)  Arth.).  The  telia  are  indistingruishable 
from  the  collective  species  which  has  aecia  also  on  various  members  of 
the  Caryophyllaceae,  Primulaceae  and  Polemoniaceae.  This  form  is 
here  listed  under  the  distinctive  name  as  the  aeciospores  are  considerably 
larger  than  the  forms  on  other  aecial  hosts  belonging  to  the  families 
mentioned  above. 

Telia  have  been  collected  in  Indiana  on  Spartina  Michauxiana  and 
reported  in  previous  lists  under  the  collective  name.  Aecia  are  also 
known  on  Polemonium  rep  tans, 

149.  Uromyces  seditiosus  Kern,  Torreya  11:212.    1911. 
On  Poacbae: 

Aristida  ramosissima  Engelm.,  Washington,  Daviess  Co.,  Septeipber 
29,  1910,  C.  C.  Deam  7618;  Elberfeld,  Warrick  County,  October  4,  1916, 
H.  S.  Jackson. 

Aecia  occur  on  various  species  of  Plantago  but  have  not  yet  been 
collected  in  Indiana. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


136 


UNCONNECTED  FORMS. 


150.  Aecidium  Boehmeriae  Arth.  Bull.  Torrey  Club  34:590.     1907. 

On  Urticaceae: 

Boehmeria  cylindrica  (L.)  Willd.,  Shades,  Montgomery  County,  May 
26,  1899,  J.  C.  Arthur. 

An  unconnected  Aecidium  the  relationship  of  which  is  uncertain. 
It  has  been  collected  otherwise  only  in  Tacoma  Park,  District  of  Co- 
lumbia. 

151.  Aecidium  Dicentrae  Trel.  Trans.  Wis.  Acad.   Sci.  6:136.     Nov. 

1884. 
On  Fumariaceae: 
Bicuculla    Cucullaria     (L.)     Millsp.,    Crawfordsville,    Montgomei-y 
County,  June  1893,  E.  W.  Olive. 

No  clue  to  the  relationship  of  this  interesting  aecidium  is  available. 

152.  Aecidium  Tithymali  Arth.  Bull.  Torrey  Club  45:151.    1918. 
On  Euphorbiaceae: 

Tithymalus  commutatus  (Engelm.)  Kl.  &  Garcke,  Lafayette,  Tippe- 
canoe County,  June  7,  1901,  H.  B.  Domer,  1905,  G.  W.  Wilson,  May  13, 
1910,  F.  D.  Kern  and  T.  Billings,  April  27,  1917,  E.  J.  Petry;  Craw- 
fordsville, Montgomery  County,  May  17,  1913,  F.  D.  Kern. 

While  many  attempts  have  been  made  to  culture  this  presumably 
heteroecious  form,  no  success  has  been  met  with  and  its  relationship 
is  still  in  doubt.  It  has  formerly  been  commonly  reported  as  A,  Euphor- 
biae  Pers.,  now  interpreted  as  a  European  species  not  occurring  in 
America. 

153.  Aecidium  Hydnoideum  B.  &  C.  Grevillea  3:61.    1874. 
On  Thymeliaceae: 

Dirca  palustris  L.,  Crawfordsville,  Montgomery  County,  1893,  E.  W. 
Olive;  Everton,  Fayette  County,  June  24,  1913,  May  14,  1915,  C.  A. 
Ludwig  (Barth.  N.  A.  Ured.  901;  Fungi  Columb.  4501) ;  West  Lafayette, 
Tippecanoe  County,  June  5,  1911,  G.  N.  Hoffer;  Urmeyville,  Johnson 
County,  1890,  E.  M.  Fisher  929. 

A  very  distinct  and  quite  common  heteroecious  form  which  has  not 
been  successfully  connected,  though  many  attempts  at  culture  have 
been  made. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


137 

154.  Aecidium  Physalidis  Burrill,  Bot.  Gaz.  9:190.     1884. 
On  Solanaceae: 

Physalis  heteropkylla  Nees,  Wea  Creek,  below  Elston,  Tippecanoe 
County,  June  27,  1900,  Wm.  Stuart. 

A  distinct  form  developing  from  a  diffused  mycelium.  Only  pycnia 
are  present  in  the  specimen  listed  above  though  the  species  has  f  r<equently 
been  observed  in  this  locality.  Another  collection  is  reported  by  Under- 
wood. 

155.  Aecidium  Trillii  Burrill,  Bot.  Gaz.  9:190.     1884. 
On  Trilliaceae: 

Trillium  sp.,  Lafayette,  Tippecanoe  County,  June  1894,  K.  Golden. 

Reported  by  Miss  Lillian  Snyder  in  the  Proceedings  for  1896,  p. 
218.  No  specimens  have  been  seen,  A  rather  rare  species  whose  rela- 
tionship is  unknown. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


139 


A  Suspected  Case  op  Stock  Poisoning  by  Wild  Onion 
(Allium  Canadense.)^ 


F.  J.  PiPAL,  Purdue  University. 


On  June  28,  1917,  a  case  of  live-stock  poisoning  had  been  reported 
by  Mr.  William  Feldt,  living  about  five  and  one-half  miles  southeast 
of  Lafayette.  Dr.  G.  M.  Funkhouser,  of  Lafayette,  who  investigated 
the  case,  reported,  in  substance,  the  following  facts: 

Five  cows  and  one  heifer  were  taken  from  a  timothy  pasture,  which 
was  rather  dry  and  short  at  that  time,  and  turned  into  a  woods  pasture 
on  Sunday  morning.  In  the  evening  of  the  same  day,  only  four  cows 
and  the  heifer  returned  from  the  pasture  to  the  farm  barnyard.  The 
fifth  cow  was  found  in  the  pasture  lying  down  and  unable  to  get  up. 
When  the  cows  were  milked  it  was  noticed,  with  one  exception,  that  the 
milk  emitted  a  very  strong  and  offensive  odor  and  had  considerably 
decreased  in  quantity.  The  breath  of  the  cows  was  also  strongly 
tainted  with  this  odor  and,  in  fact,  it  seemed  that  their  whole  bodies 
exhaled  it. 

On  the  following  morning  the  doctor  found  the  cow  left  in  the 
pasture  in  a  complete  paralytic  condition,  her  temperature,  however, 
being  quite  normal;  she  died  two  days  later.  One  of  the  cows  in  the 
barnyard  was,  by  this  time,  in  a  similar  condition  and  died  the  same 
day.  One  of  the  remaining  three  cows  stood  with  hen  head  erect,  the 
hair  bristling,  and  refused  to  move.  Another  had  a  tendency  to  draw 
her  head  to  one  side  and  when  compelled  to  move  went  around  in  a 
circle  and  fell  down.  The  third  had  a  staring  attitude  and  also  a 
tendency  to  move  in  a  circle.  The  temperature  of  all  three  animals  was 
normaL  All  died  on  the  following  day.  The  heifer  also  had  a  staring 
attitude  and  in  addition  showed  signs  of  cerebral  disturbance,  acting 
rather  wildly. 

The  post-mortem  examination  showed  that  the  inside  membrane  of 
the  paunch  was  strongly  affected,  appearing  as  though  scalded   and 


*  Contribution  from  the  Department  of  Botany  of  the  Purdue  University  Aerricultural 
Experiment  Station. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


140 

sloughing  off  very  readily.    The  feces  of  the  affected  animals  were  com- 
paratively thin  and  very  dark.     The  intestinal  tract  was  inflamed  and 


Wild  Onion  (Allium  canadcnse). 

showed  effects  similar  to  those  produced  by  gastro-enteritis.  The  con- 
tents of  the  paunch  also  emitted  a  very  strong  odor  identical  with  that 
noted  in  the  milk. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


141 

In  treating  the  animals  cathartics  and  stimulants  were  administered, 
but,  as  already  stated,  all  cows  died  and  only  the  heifer  survived  after 
a  long  struggle.  It  may  be  of  interest  to  note  that  this  heifer  refused 
feed  for  several  days  after  becoming  poisoned;  however,  when  a  bunch 
of  wild  onions  was  offered  to  her,  she  displayed  a  greedy  appetite  for 
it  and  would  have  devoured  it  had  she  been  permitted  to  do  so. 

The  strong  odor  detected  in  the  milk,  breath  and  the  paunch  of  the 
poisoned  animals  closely  resembled  that  of  wild  onion  and  provided  a 
clue  for  the  probable  cause  of  poisoning.  In  making  a  close  search  of 
the  pasture  in  question  a  good-sized  patch  of  wild  onion  (Allium  cana- 
dense)  was  foimd.  No  other  poisonous  plants  were  noticed.  The  onion 
patch  showed  much  evidence  of  recent  grazing  and  it  appeared  quite 
certain  that  the  cows  had  partaken  of  the  onions.  The  plants  in  ques- 
tion were  nearly  mature,  each  having  a  cluster  of  a  dozen  or  more 
aerial  bulblets.  The  leaves  were  nearly  all  dried  and  the  stems  were 
rather  tough.  It  was  quite  apparent,  therefore,  that  the  aerial  bulblets 
formed  the  main  portion  of  the  cows'  feast. 

All  evidence  seemed  to  point  to  the  onions  as  the  cause  of  the  poi- 
soning. This  particular  species  and  its  close  relative,  wild  garlic  (Al- 
lium vineale),  are  well  known  to  taint  dairy  products  and  the  flesh  of 
animals  feeding  on  them  in  the  pastures  of  southern  Indiana.  In  addi- 
tion to  the  tainting  effect,  they  may  also  produce  colic  and  diarrhoea, 
especially  in  horses.  No  effects  of  more  serious  consequence,  however, 
were  ever  recorded.  All  kinds  of  live-stock  are  fond  of  wild  onions  and 
garlic  and  will  usually  take  them  in  preference  to  any  forage  plants. 
However,  the  plants  are  generally  eaten,  whenever  found  in  the  pas- 
tures, in  their  tender  leaf  stage  early  in  the  spring.  The  young  plants 
are  very  mild  in  flavor  as  compared  with  the  mature  plants,  especially 
the  aerial  bulblets.  The  oil  which  gives  the  plants  their  characteristic 
odor  and  which  may  seriously  affect  the  grazing  animals,  is,  undoubtedly, 
developed  in  greater  proportion  in  the  bulblets  than  in  the  foliage  of  the 
young  plants.  This  may  account  for  the  fact  that  young  plants  cause 
no  serious  poisoning  while  plants  with  fully  developed  aerial  bulblets 
are  liable  to  prove  of  serious  consequence  when  eaten  in  excessive  quan- 
tities, especially  if  the  stock  is  not  accustomed  to  them.  Two  other 
heads  of  stock  had  been  in  the  pasture  in  question  throughout  the 
spring  months  and  no  doubt  pastured  on  the  onions.     Owing  to  the 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


142 

reasons  stated  above,  however,  they  did  not  seem  to  be  troubled  in  any 
way.  The  poisoned  animals  were  turned  in  from  a  pasture  in  which 
good  feed  was  very  scant  and  coming  upon  the  onion  patch,  they  un- 
doubtedly gorged  themselves  with  the  succulent  onion  bulblets. 

Literature  on  poisonous  plants  records  no  case  of  live-stock  poison- 
ing due  to  wild  onion.  The  Lily  family,  to  which  wild  onion  belongs, 
contains  several  poisonous  plants,  the  most  dangerous  of  which  are, 
perhaps.  Death  Camas  and  Colchicum,  the  latter  species  containing  an 
alkaloid  known  as  colchicin  (CMHaaNO«).  It  is  said'  that  "the  animals 
which  eat  the  plant  (Colchicum)  suffer  with  acute  gastro-enteritis,  coma, 
staggering,  weak  pulse  and  increased  urination."  Inasmuch  as  the 
cows  in  question  showed  some  of  these  symptoms,  particularly  the  first 
three,  it  appears  probable  that  the  onion  bulblets  contained  some  poi- 
sonous principles  similar  to  those  of  Colchicum.  Allium  unifolium,'  a 
close  relative  of  Allium  canadense,  is  said  to  be  poisonous  in  California. 

Pammel*  mentions  a  report  published  by  Dr.  W.  W.  Goldsmith  in 
the  Journal  of  Comparative  Pathology  and  Therapeutics,  and  later 
abstracted  in  the  American  Veterinary  Review  (36:63),  by  Prof.  A. 
Liautard,  upon  cattle  poisoning,  caused  by  the  garden  onion.  The  fol- 
lowing facts  are  submitted: 

"Loads  of  onions  partly  started  to  shoot  and  partly  decayed,  were 
unloaded  in  a  meadow  where  nine  head  of  cattle  were  grazing.  After 
a  week  the  cattle  seemed  sick  and  one  died,  displaying  the  following 
symptoms:  Intense  onion  odor;  tucking  up  of  flanks;  constipation  in 
some;  purging  freely  in  others;  one  vomited  abundantly;  another  very 
ill,  grunted,  was  much  constipated,  staggered  in  walking,  was  very 
tender  in  loins,  temperature  103°,  urine  dark  and  smelling  of  onions. 
Treatment:  Feeding  with  soft  food  and  hay.  Large  doses  of  linseed 
oil.  One  animal  that  was  very  ill  got  also  extract  of  belladonna  and 
carbonate  of  soda.  All  but  one  of  the  animals  recovered.  At  the  au- 
topsy of  the  dead  one,  the  rumen  was  found  inflated  and  also  the  bowels. 
Liver  enlarged  and  of  light  color.  Kidneys  dark  green  and  with  offensive 
odor.  Rumen  contained  large  quantity  of  onions  and  grass.  The  whole 
carcass  and  organs  smell  of  onions." 


'  Pammel :     Manual  of  Poisonous  Plants,  Part  II,  Page  375. 

'  Pammel :     Manual  of  Poisonous  Plants,  Part  I,  Page  104. 

*  Pammel :     Manual  of  Poisonous  Plants.  Part  II.  Pages  383-884. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


143 

The  oil  which  gives  all  species  of  the  onion,  family  their  charac- 
teristic odor,  consists  of  oxide  and  sulfides  of  allyl.  According  to  the 
National  Dispensatory,  rectified  oil  contains  mainly  a  sulfide  compound 
(C}H3)2S.  This  compound  is  said  to  possess  a  stimulating  effect  upon 
the  organs  of  the  digestive  system.  If  taken  in  excessive  quantities  it 
produces  nausea,  vomiting,  colic  and  diarrhoea.  When  in  contact  with 
the  skin  it  reddens  it  and  may  even  vesicate  it.  In  mucous  membranes 
this  effect  would  no  doubt  be  even  more  pronounced. 

In  summarizing  the  evidence  pointing  to  wild  onion  as  the  probable 
cause  of  poisoning  the  cows  in  question,  the  following  facts  stand  out 
prominently : 

1.  Apparently  healthy  cows  were  taken  from  a  pasture  where  feed 
was  scant  and  turned  into  a  woods  pasture  where  they  found  and  grazed 
heavily  on  a  patch  of  succulent  wild  onions. 

2.  Symptoms  of  poisoning  appeared  within  twelve  hours  after  pas- 
ture was  changed. 

3.  The  attending  veterinary  found  no  other  cause,  aside  from 
forage  poisoning,  which  might  have  been  responsible  for  the  condition 
of  the  affected  cows. 

4.  The  characteristic  odor  of  wild  onion  was  strongly  pronounced 
in  the  milk  and  the  whole  system  of  the  poisoned  animals. 

5.  No  other  plant  was  found  in  the  pasture,  aside  from  wild  onion, 
to  which  the  poisoning  could  be  attributed. 

6.  The  poisoned  cows  refused  to  eat  any  ordinary  feed,  but  when 
one  of  them  was  offered  a  bunch  of  wild  onions  she  manifested  a  greedy 
appetite  for  them. 

7.  The  oil  which  gives  the  species  of  Allium  their  characteristic 
odor  is  known  to  have  an  irritating  effect  on  skin  and  membraneous 
tissues,  and  causes  digestive  disturbances  if  taken  in  excess.  The  bulblets 
of  wild  onion  undoubtedly  contain  this  oil  in  comparatively  large  quan- 
tities. 

8.  A  number  of  plants  closely  allied  to  wild  onion  are  definitely 
known  to  be  poisonous,  and  some  of  the  symptoms  of  poisoning  pro- 
duced by  them,  such  as  gastro-enteritis,  coma,  and  paralysis,  are  quite 
similar  to  those  shown  by  the  cows  in  question. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


145 


II.    Additions  to  the  List  of  Plant  Diseases  of  Economic 
Importance  in  Indiana.^ 

George  A.  Osner,  Purdue  University. 


The  following  list  of  plant  diseases  represents  collections  and  ob- 
servations made  by  the  writer  and  other  members  of  the  staff  of  the 
Botanical  Department  of  the  Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  mainly 
during  the  past  season.  Specimens  of  the  diseases  listed  have  been  de- 
posited in  the  herbarium  of  the  Department  of  Botany,  Purdue  Univer- 
sity Agricultural  Experiment  Station.  Unless  otherwise  stated  the 
collections  were  made  by  the  writer. 

Barley,  (Hordeum  sp.). 

Leaf  Spot.    Helminthosporiuvi  sativum  P.  K.  B.    Tippecanoe,  June, 
1917   (H.  S.  Jackson).     Helminthosporium  teres  Sacc.     Tippe- 
canoe, June,  1917. 
Bean*  (Phaseohis  vulgaris  L.) 

Leaf  Spot    Phyllosticta  phaseolina  Sacc.     Wells,  Augrust,  1917  (H. 
V.  Knight).    This  disease  has  been  reported  previously  on  cow- 
peas.' 
Mosaic.     Cause  not  known,  Allen,  July,  1917;  Tippecanoe,  August, 
1917.    This  disease  was  very  common  during  the  past  season. 
Bean,  Lima  (Phaseolus  lunatus  var.  macrocarpus  Benth.). 

Mosaic.     Cause  not  known.     Marshall,  August,  1916;   Tippecanoe, 
July,  1917. 
Blue  Grass  (Poa  pratensis  L.). 

Ergot,  Claviceps  microcephala  (Wal.)  Tul.  Tippecanoe,  July,  1917. 
This  disease  has  been  reported  previously  on  orchard  grass  and 
timothy.* 


"This  list  is  supplementary  to  **A  List  of  Plant  Diseases  of  Economic  Importance  in 
Indiana/'  by  F.  J.  Pipal,  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.  Proc.  1915:  379-413,  and  to  "Additions  to  the 
List  of  Plant  Diseases  of  Economic  Importance  in  Indiana."  by  Geo.  A.  Osner,  Ind.  Acad. 
Sci.  Proc.  1916:    827-332. 

Contribution  from  the  Department  of  Botany,  Purdue  University  Af?ricultural  Sta- 
tion. Lafayette.  Indiana. 

'Osner.  Geo.  A.     Ind.  Acad.  Sci.     Proc.  1916:  328. 

*  Osner.  Geo.  A.     Ind.  Acad.  Sci.     Proc.   1916. 

10—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


146 

Leaf  Smut.     Ustilago  striae formis  (West.)  Niessl.    Marshall,  June, 
1916;  Tippecanoe,  July,  1917.     (See  also  under  red  top.)     This 
disease  has  been  reported  previously  on  timothy.* 
Calendula  {Calendula  officinalis  L.). 

Root  Rot.    Cortidum  vagum  B.  &  C.    Tippecanoe,  July,  1917  (C.  C. 
Rees).    This  disease  has  been  reported  previously  on  carnation, 
celery,  potato  and  bean." 
Clover,  Red   (Trifolium  pratense  L.). 

Leaf  Spot.     Cercospora  zebrina  Pass.     Tippecanoe,  July,  1917. 
Cucumber  (Cucumis  sativus  L.). 

Leaf  Spot.     Stemphylium  Cucurbitacearum  Osner.     Marshall,  Sep- 
tember, 1915;   St.  Joseph,  September,  1915    (W.  W.  Gilbert); 
Marshall,  St.  Joseph,  Starke,  September,  1916. 
June  Berry  (Amelanchier  Botryapium  D.  C). 

Leaf  Spot.    Fabrea  macxdata  (Lev.)  Atk.    Jasper,  July,  1917  (Chas. 
Chupp).     This  disease  has  been  reported  previously  on  quince 
and  pear.* 
Mignonette  (Reseda  sp.). 

Leaf  Spot.     Cercospora  Resedae  Fckl.     Tippecanoe,  August,  1907 
(H.  B.  Domer). 
Pansy  (Viola  tricolor  L.).  * 

Leaf  Spot.     Ascochyta  Violae  Sacc.     Tippecanoe,  July,  1917  (F.  J. 
Pipal). 
Potato  (Solanum  tuberosum  L.). 

Leaf  Roll.    Cause  not  known.    Laporte,  Tippecanoe,  July,  1917. 
Mosaic.     Cause  not  known.     Tippecanoe,  September,  1917. 
Silver  Scurf.     Spondylocladium  atrovirens  Harz.     Tippecanoe,  Au- 
gust, 1917;  Laporte,  Floyd,  December,  1917. 
Wilt.    Fu^arium  oxijsporum  Schl.    Tippecanoe,  Lake,  Augrust,  1917. 
Raspberry   (Rubus  sp.). 

Yellows.    Cause  not  known.     Laporte,  August,  1917. 
Red  Top   (Agrostis  alba  var.  vulgaris   (With.)   Thurb.). 

Leaf  Smut.     Ustilugo  striaeformis  (West.)  Niessl.    Marshall,  June, 
1916;  Clay,  June,  1917.     (See  also  under  blue  grass.) 


<  Underwood,  L.  M.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.  Proc.  1893:  48.  Pipal.  F.  J.  Ibid.  1915:  394. 
'  Osner.  Geo.  A.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.  Proc.  1916:  328.  331.  Pipal.  F.  J.  Ibid.  1915:  388. 
«  Pipal,  F.  J.    Ind.  Acad.  Sci.    Proc.  1915:  391,  392. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


147 

Rye  (Secale  cereale  L.). 

Anthracnose.  Colletotrichum  cereale  Manns.  Tippecanoe,  June, 
1917;  Monroe,  Allen,  July,  1917  (F.  J.  Pipal).  Severe  losses 
were  caused  by  this  disease  in  several  fields  during  the  past 
season.  This  disease  has  been  reported  previously  on  blue  gT&ss, 
timothy  and  wheat.' 

Stem  Smut  Urocystis  occulta  (Wal.)  Rab.  Marshall,  June,  1916; 
Tippecanoe,  Putnam,  June,  1917. 

Loose  Smut.  Ustilago  sp.  Tippecanoe,  Putnam,  June,  1917;  Jasper, 
July,  1917  (Chas.  Chupp).  This  disease  was  rather  rare  in 
the  three  fields  in  which  it  was  discovered.  The  fungous  shows 
close  resemblance  to  Ustilago  Tritici  (Pers.)  Jens.,  but  in  the 
absence  of  cross  inoculations  it  is  retained  as  Ustilago  sp. 
Sunflower  (Helianthtis  sp.). 

Leaf  Spot.    Cercospora  Helianthi  E.  &  E.    Tippecanoe,  July,  1907. 
Turnip   (Brassica  Rapa  L.). 

Albugo  Candida  (Pers.)   Houss.     Tippecanoe,  October,  1915   (G.  N. 
Hoffer).    This  disease  has  been  reported  previously  on  a  num- 
ber of  other  hosts.* 
Wheat  (Triticum  vulgare  L.). 

Ergot,  Claviceps  purpurea  (Fr.)  Tul.  Tippecanoe,  Elkhart,  July, 
1917;  Jasper,  July,  1917  (Chas.  Chupp).  This  disease  has  been 
reported  previously  on  rye.* 

Stinking  Smut,  Tilletia  Tritici  (Bjerk.)  Wint.  This  species  was  re- 
ported by  Pipal  in  1915.*"  Further  examination  shows  that,  the 
specimen  on  which  the  report  was  based  was  mislabeled,  the 
species  really  being  Ustilago  Tritici  (Pers.)  Jens. 


'Pipal,  F.  J.     Ind.  Acad.  Sci.     Proc.  1915:  384,  394.  395. 

« Underwood.   L.   M.     Ind.   Acad.   Sci.     Proc.   1893:   31;   1894:   153. 

Wilson,  G.  W.     Ibid.  1907:  81. 

Van  Hook,   J.  M.     Ibid.   1910:   206. 

Pipal.  F.  J.     Ibid.  1915:  392. 
•Underwood.  L.  M.     Ind,  Acad.  Sci.     Proc.  1893:  41. 

Wilson.  G.  W.     Ibid.   1894:  157. 

Pipal.  F.  J.     Ibid.  1915:  393. 
"Pipal,  F.  J.     Ind.  Acad.  Sci.     Proc.   1915:  396. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


149 

Reaction  of  Culture  Media. 


H.  A.  NoYES,  Purdue  University. 


The  reaction  of  culture  media  has  worried  every  bacteriologist  at 
some  time  in  his  career.  During  the  past  two  years  there  have  ap- 
I>eared  several  papers,  in  American  publications,  dealing  with  the  reac- 
tion of  bacteriologic  culture  media.  Among  these  may  be  mentioned 
those  by  Clark  (1),  (2),  (3),  (4);  Itano  (5);  Anthony  and  Ekroth 
(6).  Clark  and  Lubs  have  presented  papers  (3)  and  published  a  series 
of  articles  entitled,  "Colorimetric  Determination  of  Hydrogen  Ion  Con- 
centration and  Its  Applications  in  Bacteriolog^y"  (4).  This  work,  as 
well  as  all  papers  published  to  date,  including  those  presented  at  the 
1916  meeting  of  the  American  Society  of  Bacteriologists  shows  that 
bacterial  activities  in  general  are  greatest  when  the  culture  medium  is 
neutral  or  approximately  so.  A  simple,  practically  neutral  medium  is 
most  desirable  for  general  use.  Anything  which  tends  to  produce  or 
make  it  necessary  to  adjust  acidity  should  be  avoided  if  possible. 

Evidence  points  to  physical  and  chemical  laws  applying  to  culture 
media  just  as  well  as  they  do  to  water  solutions  of  pure  salts,  the  only 
difference  being,  media  are  more  complicated  and  not  as  fully  under- 
stood. Bacteriological  media  are  of  two  kinds,  liquid  and  solid.  This 
paper  is  almost  entirely  confined  to  solid  media.  The  bases  of  solid 
media  are  usually  agar  agar,  gelatin  or  silicate  jelly.  Chemicals  are 
added  to  these  bases  to  furnish  food  for  bacterial  life  and  to  make  the 
reaction  of  the  media  such,  that  bacteria  may  thrive.  More  attention 
has  been  paid  to  the  adding  of  chemicals  for  supposed  food  values  than 
to  the  ascertaining  of  the  reactions  that  take  place  between  the  chemi- 
cals themselves  and  the  basis  of  the  media. 

Acidity  or  alkalinity  of  culture  media  are  due  to  the  nature  of  the 
basic  substance  used  in  making  the  media,  and  to  the  nature  of  the 
chemicals  added  to  this  base.  The  resultant  equilibrium,  produced  by 
physio-chemical  phenomena,  notably  ionization  and  hydrolysis,  as  in- 
fluenced by  mass  action,  temperature  and  pressure  determines  the  reac- 
tion of  the  culture  media. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


150 

The  two  principal  methods  now  employed  to  determine  the  reaction 
of  media  are  the  determination  of  the  hydrogen  ion  concentration  by 
means  of  the  hydrogen  electrode,  and  the  total  titratable  acid  present 
as  determined  by  titration.  The  hydrogen  electrode  was  applied  to  bio- 
chemistry by  Sorensen  (7).  Since  1912  several  investigators  have  used 
the  hydrogen  electrode  in  the  study  of  bacterial  activities.  Among  these 
are  Michaelis  and  Marcola  (8) ;  Brunn  (9) ;  Clark  (1) ;  Itano  (5) ;  and 
Clark  and  Lubs  (10). 

The  advantages  of  the  hydrogen  electrode  in  bacteriologrical  work 
are  claimed  to  be  that  it  gives  the  hydrogen  ion  concentration  the  bac- 
teria are  in  contact  with  and  that  it  can  be  used  advantageously  in  col- 
ored solutions.  Its  disadvantages  are  that  it  can  not  be  used  in  solid 
media  and  that  for  every  grouping  of  chemicals  there  is  a  new  electro 
chemical  problem.  Different  investigators  working  with  the  hydrogen 
electrode,  from  a  purely  scientific  point  of  view,  have  not  agreed  on  the 
contact  potential  between  0.1  N,  HCL— 0.1  N.  KCl.   (11). 

This  paper  is  written  not  to  find  fault  with  the  hydrogen  electrode 
in  its  applications  to  bacteriology  but  to  point  out  some  factors  in  the 
making  of  culture  media  and  in  the  controlling  of  its  reaction  that  are 
as  important  as  the  method  by  which  the  reaction  is  determined.  It  is 
(so-called)  acidity  due  to  the  crude  methods  of  making  media  that  is 
discussed  in  the  following  paragraphs. 

Hot  Solutions. 

The  usual  procedure  followed  in  titrating  culture  media  is  crude. 
Titrations  are  conducted  in  hot  solutions  (12).  Hydrolysis  increases 
with  temperature  and  titrations  of  culture  media  containing  meat, 
peptone,  gelatine,  agar  agar  or  plant  extracts  when  made  at  high  tem- 
peratures are  much  greater  than  they  would  be  at  lower  temperatures. 
The  difference  between  hot  and  cold  titrations  is  often  more  than  the 
titration  of  the  media  at  room  temperature.  Clark  (1)  mentions  a  10 
per  cent  gelatine,  1  per  cent  peptone,  and  5  per  cent  meat  media  titrat- 
ing plus  1.0  per  cent  acid  when  hot  and  plus  0.5  per  cent  acid  at  room 
temperature. 

Small  Aliquots. 

Too  small  aliquots  of  media  are  generally  used.  Aliquots  are  pi- 
petted or  poured  out  from  graduated  cylinders.    These  methods  of  taking 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


151 

aliqnots  allow  errors  as  great  as  10  per  cent  of  the  5  cc.  aliquot  taken. 
An  error  of  .5  cc,  which  is  easily  made  with  a  graduate,  means  an 
error  of  10  cc.  per  100  cc.  of  media.  Again  an  error  of  .05  cc.  (one  drop) 
of  N/10  alkali  in  titrating  means  an  error  of  plus  or  minus  0.1  per 
cent  in  the  calculated  acidity. 

Indicator. 

Large  amounts  of  indicator  are  used.  In  the  literature  and  in  the 
standard  methods  (12)  1  cc.  of  a  %  per  cent  solution  of  phenolphthalein 
is  specified.  In  accurate  chemical  work  the  amount  the  mass  of  indi- 
cator affects  the  accuracy  of  the  determination  is  taken  into  considera- 
tion. One  or  two  drops  of  indicator  have  proven  sufficient.  Anthony 
and  Ekroth  (6)  give  a  list  of  shades  of  color  called  suitable  or  correct 
end-points  with  phenolphthalein.  The  colors  listed  vary  from  "first  trace 
of  pink"  to  "brilliant  red,"  Clark  (1)  presents  a  table  showing  that 
the  variations  in  acidity  of  a  1  and  a  5  per  cent  peptone  media  when 
these  media  were  titrated  by  four  chemists  and  four  bacteriologrists. 
The  acidities  calculated  from  the  titrations  of  the  different  workers 
varied  from  0.58  cc.  to  1.40  cc.  N/40  alkali  for  the  1  per  cent  and  from 
2.68  cc.  to  7.40  cc.  N/40  alkali  for  the  5  per  cent  media. 

Clark  and  Lubs  (4)  describe  indicators  which  undergo  rapid  color 
changes  at  certain  definite  hydrogen  ion  concentrations.  They  give 
Brom  thymol  blue  as  undergoing  color  changes  between  Ph  6.0  and  Ph  7.6. 
These  indicators  are  new  and  have  been  manufactured  (and  there, 
almost  under  protest)  by  only  one  chemical  supply  house.  Their  sta- 
bility and  the  exactness  with  which  they  can  be  used  under  the  crude 
conditions  phenolphthalein  has  been  used  are  unknown.  At  the  present 
time  it  is  fair  to  assume  that  these  new  indicators  will  come  into  gen- 
eral use,  but  as  long  as  different  investigators  do  not  agree  on  a  definite 
value  for  the  contact  potential  between  0.1  N.  HCl.  and  0.1  N.  KCl. 
phenolphthalein  is  not  to  be  discarded  for  use  under  exactly  defined  and 
proper  conditions. 

A  further  evidence  that  phenolphthalein  (properly  used)  is  satisfac- 
tory for  determining  neutrality  of  media  is  found  in  Itano's  work  on 
the  proteolysis  brought  about  by  certain  bacteria  when  put  under  known 
initial  hydrogen  ion  concentration.     The  reaction  of  all  the  media  (19) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


152 

changes  to  very  close  to  the  hydrogen  ion  concentration  at  which  phe- 
nolphthalein  changes  from  colorless  to  pink. 

The  last  report  (13)  of  the  conunittee  on  standard  methods  for  bac- 
teriological analysis  of  milk  makes  no  reconmiendation  as  to  the  adjust- 
ing of  the  reaction  of  the  media.  This  is  taken  as  an  indication  of  a 
growing  realization  by  this  committee  that  proper  selection  of  materials 
in  making  media  gives  a  media  near  to  neutral  in  reaction.  Other  evi- 
dence that  most  bacteria  will  thrive  when  media  are  somewhere  near 
neutral  is  brought  out  in  the  fact  that  most  ensymes  function  when 
kept  close  to  neutral. 

Carbon  Dioxide. 

Usually  some  carbon  dioxide  is  present  m  the  alkali  used,  and  many 
bacteriologists  consider  freshly  distilled  water  carbon  dioxide  free.  Car- 
bon dioxide  has  affected  the  accuracy  of  some  titrations,  for  we  have 
reference  to  where  investigators  advise  against  titrating  the  media  to 
a  low  per  cent  of  aciditiy  for  fear  of  volatilizing  ammonia  from  the 
ammonium  salt  used  in  making  the  media,  (14).  Ammonia  is  not  easily 
volatilized  from  acid  solutions  but  is  slowly  evolved  by  alkaline  solu- 
tions even  at  low  temperatures  (40°C.),  therefore  these  investigators  ^re 
making  their  media  nearer  neutral  than  they  think.  Slightly  alkaline 
media  saturated  with  carbon  dioxide  is  acid  to  phenolphthalein. 

Apparatus  supply  houses  are  advertising  water  stills  which,  ac- 
cording to  the  advertisements,  give  pure  distilled  water.  Quoting  from 
the  advertisement  of  one  of  the  leading  firms,  we  have  "water  of  the 
highest  purity — free  from  anmionia  and  all  gaseous  and  organic  im- 
purities." These  stills,  as  shown  by  the  titrations  given  in  the  following 
table  do  not  give  carbon  dioxide  free  water  where  the  water  used  in 
them  is  hard.  Freshly  distilled  water  made  from  the  same  local  hard 
water  supply  with  different  stills  gave  the  following  titrations  with  N/10 
carbonate  free  alkali  and  phenolphthalein.* 


*  The  water  from  which  distilled  water  is  prepared   in  many   localities  is  as   hard 
or  harder  than  that  in  this  locality. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


153 


TABLE  I. 

Cabbon  Dioxiob  in  Fushly  DurnixKD  Watbr. 

Titrated  at  room  temperature  22  "C. 

Make  or  Still. 

cc.  N/IO  Alkali  per  100  cc.  Hi(). 

Water  from            i           Water  Direct 
Collecting  Vessels.              from  Still  Outlet. 

Stokes  sUUa— 

No.  1 

No.2 

Larxe  local  plant 

0.40                                       .45 
0.05                                       .50 
0.08                                        .35 
065                                      2.10 

All  yield  water  containing  carbon  dioxide  and  the  amount  of  carbon 
dioxide  varied  with  the  same  make  as  well  as  different  makes  of  stills. 

Test  of  Effect  of  Carbon  Dioxide  on  Media  Titrations. 

The  results  reported  in  Table  II  were  an  attempt  to  find  out  how 
much  the  titration  of  media  would  be  affected  by  the  carbon  dioxide 
present  in  distilled  water  from  one  of  the  above  stills.  The  point  under 
investigation  being  to  determine  the  effect  of  carbon  dioxide,  the  water 
was  prepared  and  titrations  were  made  at  about  70  °C.  so  that  it  would  be 
evident  that  the  results  were  not  due  to  carbon  dioxide  being  absorbed 
by  the  media  or  water  from  the  air  of  the  room  while  cooling  to  room 
temperature.  Two  two-liter  flasks  which  had  previously  been  proven 
to  be  made  of  non-soluble  glass  were  filled  with  distilled  water.  The 
water  in  one  flask  was  boiled  for  about  five  minutes  to  remove  the  car- 
bon dioxide  present  while  that  in  the  other  flask  was  heated  to  75  °C. 

Duplicate  twenty-five  cc.  aliquots  of  each  media  were  weighed  into 
clean,  carbon  dioxide  free,  erlenmeyer  flasks;  100  cc.  of  the  hot  carbon 
dioxide  free  water  was  added  to  one  of  each  of  the  duplicate  aliquots 
of  media  and  100  cc.  of  the  hot  yet  unboiled  water  added  to  the  other 
flask  of  each  set  of  duplicates.  Two  drops  of  phenolphthalein  were  added 
to  each  flask  after  they  had  been  shaken  until  the  contents  appeared 
homogenous.  Titrations  were  made  with  carbonate  free  N/10  sodium 
hydroxide*  and  the  faintest  discernible,  yet  permanent  pink  coloration 


*  Make  a  solution  of  the  alkali  (sodium)  so  stronK  that  the  carbonate  contained  will 
be  precipitated.  Add  the  clear  supernatant  liquid  which  is  carbonate  free  to  carbon 
dioxide  free  water  and  standardize. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


154 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


/  155 

was  taken  as  the  end  point.     The  results  of  these  tests  with  23  lots  of 
media  are  shown  in  Table  II  and  Graph  I. 

TABLE  II. 
Acidity  of  Media  (*Calculated  in  Pkr  Cbnt.)  as  Aftkcted  by  Carbon  Dioxide  in  Distilled  Water. 


(1)  CO, 
Present 

in 
Dilution 
Water. 


(2)  CO, 

Free 
Dilution 
Water. 


(3) 

(4)  Actual 

Acidity 

Acidity  if 

Due 

Corrected 

to  CO,  in 

to  .80  by 

(1). 

(1). 

.61  (c) 

.19 

.61 

19 

.66 

.14 

.39-f 

—  41 

.18 

.62 

.60 

.2') 

.64 

.16 

.92 

—  .12 

.93 

—  .13 

.76 

.04 

.74 

.06 

55 

.25 

.91 

—  .14 

1.48 

-.68 

1  07 

—.27 

.12 

.68 

.56 

.24 

1.03 

—.23 

1.12 

-.32 

1.16 

-.36 

1.51 

—  .69 

.86 

-.06 

1.06 

—.26 

(5)  Actual 
Acidity  if 
Corrected 
to  .50  by 

(1). 


Agarf  (alone) 

Agar  and  1  gm.  starch 

Agar  and  2  gm.  starch 

Agar  and  10  gm.  soil 

Agar  and  ammonium  nitrate 

Agar  and  7.5  gms.  gelatine \ 

Agar  and  .05  gms.  peptone 

Agar  and  1.0  gms.  sodium  asparaginate 

Agar.  1  gm.  starch  and  10  gms.  soil 

Agar,  1  gm.  starch  and  1  gm.  (ammon.  nitrate 
(b)) 

Agar,  1  gm.  starch  and  7.5  gelatine •? 

Agar,  2  gm.  starch  and  7.5  gelatine 

Agar,  2  gm.  starch  and  .05  gm.  peptone 

Agar,  10 gms.  soil  and  1  gm.  (ammon.  nitrate).. 

Agar,  10  gms.  soil,  2  gms.  starch  and  7.5 

gelatine 

Lq>man  and  Brown's  "sjmthetic  agar". .  . 
II.  J.  Conn's  (sodium  asparaginate  agar) 


.07% 

.08 

.06 

.00— 

.58 

.12 

.16 

.08 

.10 

.04 

.44 
.11 
.16 
.10 

.08 
.72 

.08 
22 

.28 

.32 

.36 
1.38 
1.40 


alk 

alk 

alk. 

alk 

acid. 

nlk. 

alk 

alk 

alk 

alk. 

alk. 
alk. 
alk 
alk. 
alk. 
acid. 

alk. 
alk. 
alk. 
alk. 
alk. 
alk. 
alk. 


*1.00%  would  mean  the  requirement  of  1  cc.  normal  alkali  for  neutralisation  of  100  cc.  of  media. 
fFlfteen  grams  of  air  dry  agar  basis  of  all  media. 

(a)  Each  figure  given  represents  one  lot  of  media.    No  two  lots  of  same  media  were  made  on  same 
date. 

(b)  Phenolphthalein  is  not  the  most  desirable  indicator  to  use  when  ammonium  salts  are  present. 

(c)  Distilled  water  prepared  from  soft  water  is  often  practically  free  from  carbon  dioxide. 

The  table  shows — 

(1)  That  the  carbon  dioxide  normally  present  in  distilled  wate* 
prepared  from  hard  water  by  a  modem  still  affects  the  titration  of  media. 

(2)  That  the  titration,  due  to  carbon  dioxide  present  in  diluting 
water  may  be  much  greater  than  the  total  titration  of  the  acidity  of 
the  media  itself. 

(3)  That  the  carbon  dioxide  does  not  aifect  the  acidity  of  all  media 
in  the  same  proportion. 

(4)  Media  adjusted  by  results  of  titrations  made  of  aliquots  diluted 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


156 

with  water  containing  carbon  dioxide  are  always  less  acid  than  desired, 
in  fact  some  media  are  alkaline,  note  columns  headed  (4)  and  (5). 

Distilled  water  is  believed  by  so  many  to  be  carbon  dioxide  free,  no 
matter  whether  the  water  from  which  it  is  made  is  hard  or  soft,  that, 
as  a  rule  bacteriologic  culture  media  has  been  adjusted  to  a  less  degree 
of  acidity  than  planned  for.  Litmus  is  not  sensitive  to  carbonic  acid, 
thus  it  seems  fair  to  assume  that  acidities  of  culture  media,  observed 
with  phenolphthalein,  but  which  do  not  prove  out  with  litmus  may  be 
partly  due  to  the  carbon  dioxide  present  in  the  dilution  water  added  to 
the  aliquot  titrated.  Anthony  and  Ekroth  (6)  make  statements  con< 
ceming  the  work  of  MacNeal,  Muir  and  Ritchie,  Stilt,  and  others  con- 
cerning comparisons  between  litmus  and  phenolphthalein  titrations.  Ti- 
trations with  phenolphthalein  carried  out  near  the  boiling  point  of  the 
media  are  unreliable,  due  to  the  increased  hydrolysis  of  the  media  and 
to  the  fact  that  phenolphthalein  is  more  sensitive  in  cold  solutions  (15). 

Hot  and  Cool  Titrations  With  Especially  Prepared  Media. 

An  experiment  was  conducted  to  find  out  the  effect  of  temperature 
on  acidity  titrations  when  agar  agar  plus  gelatin  were  present  with 
salts  that  undergo  changes  in  hydrolysis  with  increasing  temperature. 
The  agar  agar  and  gelatin  used  were  selected  because  of  their  small 
changes  in  acidity  when  autoclaved  or  heated.  They  were  selected  by  a 
procedure  described  by  the  author  {V6)  in  another  article.  Unfiltered 
water  solutions  of  the  agar  and  gelatin  used  were  free  from  pre- 
cipitates and  thus  by  themselves  did  not  even  need  filtering. 

Two  basic  media  were  made  up  according  to  the  following  procedure: 

Agar  agar  Media, — Thirty  grams  of  agar  agar  were  dissolved  in 
the  inner  part  of  a  double  boiler  in  2,000  cc.  of  carbon  dioxide  free  dis- 
tilled water.  When  solution  was  complete  distilled  water  (carbon  diox- 
ide free)  was  added  to  make  the  weight  of  agar  and  water  up  to  2,000 
gms. 

Agar  plus  Gelatin  Media, — This  was  made  up  exactly  as  the  agar 
media  except  that  7.5  grams  of  gelatin  were  added  per  1,000  grams  of 
media. 

Fifty  gram  aliquots  of  each  media  were  weighed  out  into  clean 
250  cc.  erlenmeyer  flasks.  Thirty-four  aliquots  of  each  media  were 
taken.     The  chemicals  were  previously  prepared  by  making  water  solu- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


157 

tions  of  them  of  such  concentration  that  they  contained  .05  grams  of 
salt  per  cc.  of  solution.  One  cc.  aliquots  of  the  proper  solutions  were 
added  to  aliquots  of  the  media  using  a  1  cc.  pipette  graduated  to  .01  cc. 
This  was  to  give  a  concentration  of  the  salt  of  1.0  gram  per  liter  of 
media. 

The  flasks  were  tightly  plugged  with  cotton  and  autoclaved  for 
different  lengths  of  time  under  17  pounds  pressure  of  live  steam.  It 
was  assumed  from  previous  tests  that  the  one  cc.  of  water  added  with 
the  salt  would  be  lost  in  the  autoclaving.  As  soon  as  autoclaved  ap- 
proximately 100  cc.  of  boiling  carbon  dioxide  free  distilled  water  was 
added  to  each  flask.  Titrations  were  made  at  the  temperatures  specified 
using  2  drops  of  0.5  per  cent  solution  of  phenolphthalein  as  indicator 
and  N/10  carbonate  free  sodium  hydroxide.  The  results  are  given  in 
Table  III. 


TABLE  III. 

ArTDITY  OF  AOAB  AOAB  AND  AOAR  PlUS  GeLATIXE  MbDIA  AS  AfFBCTED  BY  SaLTS  AND  LeNOTH  OF  TIME 

OP  Sterilization. 
(Figures  express  cc.  normal  alkali  needed  to  neutralize  100  cc.) 


Hot  90*. 

40- 
to 
45». 

Increase 

90*  Over 

40^ 

Increase 
Due  to 
Salts. 

90**  40". 

Increase 
Due  to 
Gelatin. 
90"  40". 

Potassium  nitrate  (3) 

.03 

.30 

.84 

.03 
.04 
.04 
.03 
.03 

.01 
.30 
.80 

.01 
.03 
.03 
.03 
03 

.02 
.50 
.04 

Ammonium  nitrate  (3) 

Aluminum  nitrate  (3) 

Agar — 

Autoclaved  0.0  hours 

.02 
.01 

.01 
.00 
.00 

Autoclaved  1 . 0  hours 

Autoclaved  2.0  hours 

Autoclaved  4.0  hours 

.01     .00 
.01     .00 
.02     .01 
.00     .00 

Average  ,    .   

.008 

.02 
.02 
.01 
.00 

Agar  and  KNOr- 

Autoclaved  0 , 5  hours 

.05 
.05 
.05 
.03 

.03 
.03 
.04 
.03 

Autoclaved  1 . 0  hours     ....         

Autoclaved  2.0  hours 

Autoclaved  4 . 0  hours .    .                

Averages 

.013 

.15 
.18 
.15 

.22 

.01     .003 

.32     .18 
.34     .17 
.32     .17 
.37     .15 

Agar  and  NH«NO,- 
Autoclaved  0.6  hours 

Autoclaved  1.0  hours 

Autoclaved  2 . 0  hours 

.36 
.38 
.35 

.40 

.21 

.20 
.20 
.18 

Autoclaved  4.0  hojrs 

Avi»ragcs 

.176 

.338  .168 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


158 


TABLE  m-Continued. 


AKara^AKNOOr- 
AutoiNved  0.6  hours 
AutoclavM  1  0  hours 
AutocIavc(i2  OAjours 
A6toclaved4.0  1ur 


Ajcar  plus  Gelatin — 

Autoclaved  0.0  hours 
Autoclaved  0.5  hoars 
Autoolaved  1.0  hours 
Autoclaved  2 . 0  hours 
Autoclaved  4 . 0  hours 


Agar  plus  Golatino  and  KNOj— 
Autoclaved  0.5  hours 
Autoclaved  1 .0  hours 
Autoclaved  2.0  hours. 
Autocliived  4 . 0  hours . 


AKar  plus  Gelatin  and  NH,  NOi* 

Autoclaved  0.5  hours 

Autoclaved  1 . 0  hours 

Autoclaved  2 . 0  hours 

Autochived  4 . 0  hours 


f 


Af(ar  plus  Gelatin  and  A I  (NO«)a' 

Autoclaved  0.5  hours 

Autoclaved  1.0  hours 

Autoclaved  2 . 0  hours 

Autoclaved  4.0  hours 


Averages 


*  Precipitation  occjrrc.l  in  all  aliquots  of  this  scries. 

(1)  Figures  in  this  column  are  difference  between  the  media  without  and  with  added  } 

(2)  Figures  in  this  column  are  difference  between  corresponding  media  containing  no  i 

(3)  Thtisc  salts  were  used  because  they  are  typical  of  classes  of  salts  that  vary  in  hydrtf 

Table  III  brings  out  the  following: 

(1)  The  temperature  of  the  media  affects  the  titration. 

(2)  The  effect  of  temperature  on  titration  varies  with  the 
the  media  and  the  chemicals  used  in  making  the  media. 

(3)  Increasing  length  of  time  of  autoclaving  does  not  appre<f 
change  the  acidity  of  the  media. 

(4)  Potassium  nitrate  did  not  appreciably  change  the  acidity  o] 
agar  or  the  agar  plus  gelatin  media. 


zed  by  Google     f 


159 

(5)  The  effect  of  the  nitrates  used  seemed  to  be  due  more  to  the 
hydrolysis  of  the  nitrates  themselves  rather  than  to  reactions  taking 
place  between  them  and  the  agar  and  gelatin. 

(6)  Reaction  of  media  should  be  adjusted  by  titrations  made  at  the 
temperature  at  which  they  are  to  be  used. 

The  results  of  this  test  lead  one  to  presume  that  if  proper  care  was 
used  in  selecting  the  chemicals  to  be  used  in  culture  media,  the  acidity 
of  bacteriologric  culture  media  would  rarely  have  to  be  neutralized. 

Evidence  Drawn  From  Literature  in  Support  of  Contention  That 
Hydrolyzable  Substances  Should  Be  Avoided. 

Anthony  and  Ekroth  (6)  give  a  table  which  shows  the  reaction  of 
different  peptones  when  titrated  at  room  and  boiling  temperatures  with 
phenolphthalein  as  indicator.  The  results  show  that  the  variations  in 
acidity  of  the  different  peptones  are  large  but  that  the  peptone  having 
the  lowest  acidity  at  room  temperature  also  has  the  lowest  at  boiling 
temperature.  Witte's  peptone  has  been  almost  universally  agreed  upon 
as  the  best  and  is  it  not  fair  to  suppose  that  this  is  due  to  its  freedom 
from  hydrolyzable  material? 

The  same  authors  found  that  "Leibig's  Extract  of  Beef"  does  not 
undergo  the  hydrolysis  that  homemade  extracts  do.  They  say,  "This 
stability  is  due  probably  to  very  prolonged  heating  in  the  preparation 
of  the  beef  extract  itself."  In  other  words  the  more  stable  the  extract 
the  more  reason  for  its  use. 

Itano  (5)  working  with  the  hydrogen  electrode  finally,  after  experi- 
mentation, decided  on  a  medium  containing  both  "Leibig's  extract"  and 
Witte's  peptone.  He  found  that  if  these  constituents  were  sterilized 
before  mixing,  i.  e.,  if  they  were  stabilized,  "the  medium  prepared  from 
them  maintained  the  figured  Ph  fairly  constantly." 

Fellers  (17)  finds  that  soil  bacteria  prefer  a  very  slightly  acid,  a 
neutral  or  just  alkaline  media. 

Summarizing  the  results  obtained  •  by  these  recent  workers  and 
realizing  that  the  standard  method  of  titrating  media  (12)  gives  too 
high  titrations  and  thereby  low  acidity  of  adjusted  media,  it  seems 
probable  that  bacteriologic  media  in  most  cases  should  be  very  slightly 
acid  or  neutral  in  reaction. 

The  following  procedure  which  is  based  on  results  reported  in  Tables 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


160 

I,  II  and  III,  has  proven  satisfactory  for  the  titration  of  media:  Twenty- 
five  gram  aliquots  of  the  hot  media  are  weighed  out  into  350  cc.  erlen- 
meyer  flasks  (Jena,  pryex  or  non-sol),  which  have  just  been  rinsed  with 
carbon  dioxide  free  water.  Approximately  250  cc.  of  hot,  carbon  dioxide 
free  distilled  water  is  added  to  each  flask  and  the  flasks  are  shaken 
until  after  the  mixture  of  water  and  media  appear  homogeneous.  They 
are  then  loosely  stoppered  and  set  to  one  side  until  they  attain  room 
temperature.  Titrations  are  then  made  with  N/10  carbonate  free  alkali 
and  two  drops  of  a  ^  per  cent  solution  of  phenolphthalein.  The  end 
point  is  reached  on  the  appearance  of  the  faintest,  yet  permanent  pink 
color.  The  fainter  the  color  one  is  able  to  titrate  to,  the  more  accurate 
the  titration. 

Summary. 

(A)  Ideal  media  for  routine  bacteriological  work,  if  rightly  pre- 
pared from  selected  agar  agar  from  stabilized  peptone,  from  stabilized 
meat  extracts  and  from  chemicals  which  hydrolize  but  little,  does  not 
need  to  be  adjusted  in  reaction  unless  the  chemicals  inter-react  (which 
should  lead  to  a  choice  of  other  chemicals). 

(B)  It  is  fairly  well  established  that  most  bacteria  will  thrive  in 
a  neutral  medium.  The  standard  methods  (12)  have  allowed  media  to 
be  adjusted  to  nearer  neutral  than  the  figures  would  indicate. 

(1)  Titrations  have  been  carried  out  in  hot  solutions  where  hy- 
drolysis is  great  and  media  corrected  to  certain  standards  by  these  ti- 
trations is  always  nearer  neutral  when  at  blood  heat  or  a  lower  tem- 
perature. 

(2)  Many  have  used  alkali  and  water  containing  carbon  dioxide 
and  the  errors  resulting  have  caused  media  to  be  adjusted  to  lower 
acidity  than  desired. 

(C)  Hydrolyzable  chemicals  have  been  used  and  their  use  has  made 
results  uncertain. 

(D)  Meat  infusions,  peptones,  and  other  extracts  have  been  found 
to  vary  greatly  in  reaction.  Those  extracts  and  peptones  griving  best 
results  happen  to  be  those  that  are  most  stabilized. 

(E)  Some  organizims  tolerate  more  acidity  than  others  (3)  and 
the  hydrogen  ion  concentration  must  be  determined  if  classifications  are 
to  be  made  on  the  basis  of  tolerance  to  H  and  OH  ion  concentrations. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


161 

(F)  Workers  in  physical  chemistry  have  determined  that  for  each 
acid  there  is  a  dilution  beyond  which  the  per  cent  ionized  remains  con- 
stant. When  25  cc.  of  media  that  is,  at  most,  only  slightly  acid  is  further 
diluted  with  carbon  dioxide  free  water  (as  must  be  done  to  titrate  at 
room  temperature)  the  per  cent  acid  ionized  has  reached  its  limit.  The 
difference  between  the  value  obtained  with  the  hydrogen  electrode  and 
that  obtained  by  titration  under  proper  conditions  is  thus  small  or 
negligible. 

(G)  Itano  (5)  (X9)  has  found  that  proteolysis  is  optimum  when 
the  hydrogen  ion  concentration  of  media  is  in  or  at  the  range  where 
phenolphthalein  titrations  properly  carried  out  would  indicate  neutrality. 

Diiferent  investigators  have  suggested  brom  thymol  blue  and  phenol 
red  for  phenolphthalein.  This  has  not  been  done  because  the  paper  is 
intended  to  bring  out  errors  in  making  media  which  must  be  corrected 
if  any  indicator  is  used.  The  values  used  at  present  for  the  contact 
potential  prevent  one  from  adopting  any  shade  of  any  indicator  as  ab- 
solute neutrality. 

The  author  wishes  to  make  acknowledgment  to  Dr.  Redfield  of  the 
Bureau  of  Chemistry  for  criticisms  and  suggestions.  Acknowledgments 
are  also  due  to  Director  C.  G.  Woodbury,  for  it  is  only  with  his  consent 
that  the  writer  can  devote  any  time  to  consideration  of  this  subject. 

Bibliography. 

(1)  Clark,  Wm.  Mansfield: 

1915  Journal  of  Infectious  Diseases,  Vol.  17,  page  109. 

(2)  Clark,  Wm.  Mansfield: 

1915  Journal  of  Infectious  Diseases,  Vol.  17,  page  131. 

(3)  Clark,  Wm.  Mansfield,  and  same  author  with  H.  A.  Lubs. 

1916  Papers  presented  at  Meeting  of  American  Society  of  Bac- 
teriologists, December,  1916,  abstracted  in  Bacteriological  Ab- 
stracts, Vol.  1,  No.  1. 

(4)  Clark,  Wm.  Mansfield,  and  Lubs,  H.  A. 

1917  Journal  of  Bacteriology,  Vol.  2,  Nos.  1  and  2. 

(5)  Itano,  Arao: 

1916  Massachusetts  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  Bulletin 
No.  167. 

11—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


162 

(6)  Anthony,  Bertha  Van  H.,  and  Ekroth,  C.  V.: 

1916  Journal  of  Bacteriology,  Vol.  1,  No.  2. 

(7)  Sorensen,  S.  P.  L.: 

Ergebnisse  D.  Physiologie,  Vol.  12,  page  416. 

(8)  Michaelis  and  Marcova: 

1912  Zeitschr.  f.     Immunitatsforschung,  Vol.  14. 

(9)  Brunn: 

1913  Ueber  das  Desinfectionsvermogen  der  Sauren  Diss.  Berlin. 

(10)  Clark,  Wm.  Mansfield,  and  Lubs,  H.  A.: 

1915  Journal  of  Infectious  Diseases,  Vol.  17,  No.  1. 

(11)  Loomis,  N.  E.,  and  Meacham,  M.  R.: 

Note  at  end  of  article  in  1916  Journal  of  American  Chemical 
Society,  Vol.  38,  No.  11. 

(12)  Committee  on  Standard  Methods  A.  Pub.  Health: 

(1905-1913)  also,  Standard  Methods  examination  of  Water  and 
Sewage,  1912. 

(13)  Report  of  Committee  on   Standard   Methods   of   Milk  Analysis 

(Bacteriological) . 

1916  American  Journal  of  Public  Health,  Vol.  6,  No.  12. 

(14)  Conn,  H.  Joel: 

1915  New   York   Agricultural   Experiment   Station   Technical 
Bulletin  No.  38,  page  17.* 

(15) 

1894  The  Analyst,  page  256. 

(16)  Noyes,  H.  A.: 

1916  Science  New  Series,  Vol.  44,  No.  1144. 

(17)  Fellers,  C.  R.: 

1916  Soil  Science,  Vol.  2,  No.  3,  September. 

(18)  Stieglitz,  Acree,  Jones.  Noyes,  A.  A.,  etc.: 

Articles  in  Journal  of  American  Chemical  Society  and  their 
books  dealing  with  theory  of  indicators. 

(19)  Itano,  Arao: 

1916  Massachusetts  Agricultural  Experiment  Station  Bulletin 
167,  pages  173  and  184. 

(20)  Landolt  and  Berstein: 

Tables  on  ionization  constants  for  acids  and  bases. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


163 


Studies  on  Pollen. 


F.  M.  Andrews — Indiana  University. 


Since  the  time  of  Amici  it  has  been  known  that  pollen  grains  ger- 
minate and  send  out  one  or  two  tubes.  Amici  carried  on  his  studies 
on  this  point  on  the  plant  Portulaca  oleracea.  Ever  since  the  work  of 
Amici  various  investigations  have  been  made  on  the  germination  of 
pollen  and  especially  concerning  the  different  conditions  that  would 
promote  its  growth.  Even  yet,  many  points  remain  obscure  and  much 
investigation  will  be  necessary  before  these  are  solved.  As  the  chemical 
nature  of  the  stigmatic  fluid  is  complicated  and  varies  greatly  in  differ- 
ent plants,  it  renders  the  culture  medium  used  to  induce  growth  a  mat- 
ter of  one  experiment  after  another  with  different  media  in  order  to 
ascertain  which  will  induce  growth  or  is  best  adapted  to  the  various 
cases.  Of  course  it  is  known  that  in  a  good  many  cases  a  sugar  solu- 
tion will  cause  growth,  but  this  is  by  no  means  the  case  with  the  pollen 
of  all  plants,  so  that  other  means  frequently  have  to  be  tried.  Moreover 
the  physical  character  of  the  culture  medium  is  a  factor  that  has  been 
very  generally  overlooked. 

In  the  experiments  here  mentioned  I  have  investigated  to  date  the 
behavior  of  the  pollen  of  435  plants  with  respect  to  a  culture  medium  of 
cane  sugar.  Of  these,  110  showed  no  response  whatsoever  as  no  growth 
occurred.  The  remainder  showed  a  more  or  less  pronounced  growth. 
A  wide  range  in  the  percentage  of  the  cane  sugar  solutions  was  used 
so  that  ample  opportunity  for  growth  was  afforded  by  this  medium  if 
such  a  medium  would  produce  it.  Plants  from  many  different  families 
as  well  as  from  the  same  family  were  tried  so  as  to  see  in  how  far 
differences  in  germination  under  such  conditions  would  occur. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


165 
Stoppage  of  a  Sewer  Line  by  Roots  uf  Acer  Saccharum. 


F.  M.  Andrews — Indiana  University. 


The  many  well-known  examples  of  stoppage  of  sewer  and  pipe  lines 
is  probably  exceeded  from  the  standpoint  of  time,  at  least,  by  the  fol- 
lowing example: 

A  six-inch  sewer  pipe  line  was  laid  five  feet  deep  between  two 
trees  of  Acer  saccharum.  For  two  years  the  line  remained  perfectly 
clear  of  all  obstruction  and  no  difficutly  was  experienced.  Late  in  the 
summer  of  the  third  year  a  stoppage  of  this  line  suddenly  occurred. 
The  trees  above  referred  to  are  21  years  old,  about  6  inches  in  diameter 
and  about  50  feet  high  and  are  vigorous  specimens.  They  stand  on  a 
west  exposure  and  on  a  bank  in  the  open  where  they  are  subjected  to 
the  direct  rays  of  the  sun.  The  bank  was  a  narrow  one,  so  that  the 
ground  was  quickly  dried  out  and  the  most  actively  growing  part  was 
excessively  dry.  This  caused  the  roots  to  grow  down  very  quickly  in 
search  of  water  and  to  escape  the  upper  and  lateral  very  dry  layers  of 
the  soil.  On  nearing  the  pipes  there  was  also  a  chemotactic  attraction 
exerted.  The  roots  finding  a  small  opening  grew  in  quickly,  effecting  a 
complete  closure  of  the  tile  line  for  a  distance  of  fifteen  feet.  By  their 
further  quick  growth,  especially  after  entrance,  the  heavy  cement  joints 
were  completely  ruptured.  The  sewer  line  was  replaced  in  the  region 
affected  by  heavy  double-hub  cast-iron  pipe  whose  joints  were  sealed 
with  lead.  Within  the  space  of  a  few  months,  therefore,  the  roots  of 
these  trees  had  completely  blocked  the  pipes.  The  universally  known 
tendency  of  Populus  deltoides  as  well  as  the  roots  of  other  trees  and 
plants  to  grov/  into  sewer  and  water  pipes  is  common  knowledge.  The 
location  of  the  stoppage  in  a  sewer  line  may  be  ascertained  with  com- 
parative accuracy.  This  can  be  easily  done,  since  one  can  ascertain  the 
volume  of  a  given  section  of  the  pipe  and  the  metered  volume  of  water 
required  to  fill  the  pipe  from  stoppage  to  the  water  supply,  due  con- 
sideration of  course  to  be  paid  to  those  cases  in  which  the  stoppage  may 
not  be  complete  and  where  some  water  may  pass  through. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


167 


Anthocyanin  of  Beta  Vulgaris. 


F.  M.  Andrews — Indiana  University. 


If  a  freshly  made  solution  of  chlorophyll  is  placed  in  a  transparent 
vessel  in  the  direct  sunlight  it  is  well  known  that  in  a  few  hours  the 
chlorophyll  will  be  broken  down  and  will  become  more  or  less  brown  in 
color.  If,  however,  part  of  the  freshly  made  solution  of  chlorophyll  is 
placed  in  the  dark  it  will  remain  apparently  unchanged  in  color  even 
after  twenty-four  hours  or  longer.  The  above  mentioned  behavior  of 
chlorophyll  acts  quite  differently  from  the  anthocyanin  of  Beta  vulgaris. 
The  anthocyanin  of  this  plant  forms  one  of  those  examples  where  the 
pigment  forms  in  the  subterranean  parts.  The  behavior  of  this  pigment 
with  reference  to  the  light  is  quite  different  as  regards  preservation  in 
the  light.  If  a  strong  solution  of  the  anthocyanin  of  Beta  vulgaris  is 
placed  in  a  test-tube  in  darkness  it  will  continue  to  preserve  its  normal 
color  for  more  than  a  week.  Quite  different  from  chlorophyll  if  a  strong 
solution  of  this  anthocyanin  is  exposed  in  a  test-tube  in  direct  sunlight 
it  will  retain  its  normal  bright  color  for  a  week,  or  sometimes  more, 
or  until  broken  down  and  disorganized  by  bacterial  action.  This  latter 
effect  finally  happens  to  the  solution  of  anthocyanin  of  Beta  vulgaris 
in  the  dark.  So  that  whether  in  the  light  or  dark  the  color  remains 
almost  the  same  length  of  time.  While  it  is  clear  that  the  presence  of 
anthocyanin  in  various  plants  is  not  important  like  chlorophyll,  still  a 
comparative,  exhaustive  study  of  the  two  pigments  under  different 
physiological  conditions  is  much  to  be  desired  and  would  make  a  valu- 
able contribution. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


169 
Improved  Forms  of  Maximows'  Automatic  Pipette. 


F.  M.  Andrews — Indiana  University. 


Grafe*  figures  and  describes  the  automatic  pipette  of  Maximows 
(Fig.  1).  The  pipette  as  given  by  Maximows  is  very  practical  but  is 
in  part  difficult  of  manipulation  and  needs  some  improvements,  which 
I  have  supplied.  In  the  first  place  a  Woulfe  bottle  with  three  openings 
at  the  top  is  not  necessary  nor  is  a  bottle  with  a  tubulure  at  the  base 
absolutely  essential,  although  it  is  convenient.  Any  bottle  having  an 
opening  at  the  top  and  provided  with  a  stopper  having  four  holes  is 
sufficient.  The  funnel  shown  in  Maximows'  drawing  is  also  unnecessary. 
If,  as  Grafe  describes,  one  closes  A  and  B  (Fig.  1),  and  opens  C  the 
NaOH  in  D  flows  out,  creating  a  partial  vacuum  in  D  and  causing  the 
desired  solution,  in  this  case  baryta  water,  to  rise  in  the  pipette  E  if 
the  pinch  cock  F  is  open.  If  now  one  opens  B  air  will  enter  D,  allowing 
the  solution  in  E  to  sink  and  thus  measure  the  quantity  of  fluid.  In 
this  last  operation  is  the  chief  difficulty,  for  when  B  is  closed  after 
opening  the  solution  in  E  will  generally  not  cease  to  sink  at  once  owing 
to  the  reduced  pressure  in  D  produced  by  the  column  of  solution  in  E. 
Since  accuracy  is  the  prime  consideration  here  a  slight  error  is  fatal  for 
correct  results.  Furthermore  the  glass  tube  B  should  extend  below 
the  surface  of  the  NaOH  or  KOH  solution  to  insure  the  removal  of  all 
CO2  and  the  outside  air  not  be  allowed  to  enter  too  rapidly.  Aiso  it 
will  be  seen  according  to  Fig.  1  that  the  NaOH  or  KOH  solution  would 
be  wasted  in  the  Maximows  apparatus.  The  control  of  the  outflow  of 
the  solution  in  E  should  be  for  the  sake  of  accuracy  and  convenience 
not  at  B  but  at  the  lower  end  of  the  pipette  E.  Maximows  used  the 
funnel  A  for  refilling,  which  is  unnecessary. 

The  above  difficulties  I  have  removed  by  a  modification  of  Maximows' 
apparatus  as  shown  in  Figs.  2,  3,  and  4,  which  I  will  now  briefly  de- 
scribe. In  both  Figs.  2  and  3,  which  are  photographs,  bottles  with 
one  opening  at  the  top  could  be  used  instead  of  the  Woulfe  bottles. 


*  Grafe.    Dr.    Viktor — EmahrunKsphysioloyrisches    Praktikum    der    hoherer    Pflanzen, 
p.  360. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


170 

Fig.  2  shows  the  apparatus  in  a  position  on  the  ring  stana  A  loi 
filling  the  pipette  E.  If  one  opens  C  the  NaOH  solution  in  D  will  run 
into  G  which,  when  I  is  open,  will  cause  the  baryta  solution  to  rise  in 


f    o-O 


F^.r 


E  to  the  desired  height.  If  now  C  and  I  are  closed  and  B  opened  it 
will  allow  the  air  to  enter  D  when  J  is  opened  and  the  solution  allowed 
to  run  out.  The  NaOH  or  KOH  solution  in  D  will  arrest  any  CO2  pres- 
ent so  that  the  baryta  solution  will  remain  clear.  The  baryta  solution 
in  L  remains  clear  since  the  calcium  chloride  tube  K,  which  contains 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


171 

soda  lime,  extracts  the  COa  of  the  air  as  it  enters  L  when  any  of  the 
solution  is  drawn, into  the  pipette  E.  The  solution  of  NaOH  or  KOH  in 
D  in  Fig.  1  is  not  used  further  after  escaping  according  to  Grafe's 
figfure.     In  Fig.  2  I  show  that  it  is  collected  in  another  bottle  H,  which 


is  similar  in  size  and  construction  to  D.  By  elevating  the  bottle  G  to  a 
position  M  on  the  ring  stand  A  above  D  and  opening  J,  as  shown  by 
Fig  3,  the  same  solution  of  NaOH  or  KOH  runs  back  into  D  and  can 
be  used  again.  By  this  apparatus  a  large  number  of  measurements 
may  be  quickly  and  very  accurately  made.  The  tube  F  with  soda  lime 
is  not  necessary  in  Figs.  3  and  4  since  the  KOH  removes  the  COa. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


172 

Figure  4  is  a  photograph  of  the  apparatus  used  by  Detmer'  for 
estimating  the  amount  of  COa  produced  by  plants,  and  including  also 
the  titrating  apparatus  for  measuring  used  by  him.  The  apparatus  as 
shown  in  Fig.  4   is  given  only  to  demonstrate  an  improved   form   of 


Maximows*   automatic   pipette,  which  may  advantageously  be  used   in 
connection  with  the  Detmer  apparatus.' 

If  one  opens  the  pinch  cock  A  (Fig.  4),  the  baryta  water  in  B, 
freed  from  the  CO2  by  the  soda  lime  in  C,  flows  into  the  burette  D  as 
shown  by  Detmer  and  the  air  in  D  escaping  through  E.     If  now  one 

»  Detmer,    W.— Practical    Plant    Physiology.      Translation    by    S.    A.    Moor,    pp.    264 
and  267. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


173 

closes  A  and  E  and  opens  F  the  measured  baryta  water  in  D  will  flow 
into  the  Pettenkofer  tube  G.  This  outflow  from  D  will  cause  the  baryta 
water  in  the  Erlenmeyer  flask  M  to  rise  in  the  pipette  I.  It  goes  without 
saying  that  for  convenience  the  capacity  of  D  and  I  should  be  equal. 
Next  close  F  and  H  and  open  E  and  J.  The  air  will  then  enter  E  when 
the  COa  will  be  removed  by  the  soda  lime  in  O  before  entering  I  through 
K.  This  will  allow  the  measured  baryta  water  in  I  to  flow  out  of  J 
into  a  suitable  vessel  for  titration.  In  this  way  the  baryta  water  meas- 
ured into  G,  through  which  CO2  is  to  be  passed,  furnishes  the  power  in 
a  convenient  way  for  fllling  and  accurately  measuring  an  equal  amount 
in  I,  through  which  the  CO2  of  respiring  plants  is  passed  for  comparison. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


175 


The  Effect  of  Centrifugal  Force  on  Plants. 


F.  M.  Andrews — Indiana  University. 


The  effect  of  the  successive  displacement  of  contents  in  plant  cells 
has  never  been  carried  out  to  the  full  extent.  This  would  be  an  inter- 
esting piece  of  research  in  as  much  as  it  would  show  not  only  the 
capacity  of  plant  cells  to  resist  possible  injury  by  repeated  displace- 
ment of  the  contents  over  long  periods,  but  also  that  it  would  demon- 
strate the  recuperative  power  of  such  cells.  Especially  if  this  latter 
began  to  diminsh  it  would  be  important  to  know  when  and  how  rapidly 
the  protoplasm  reacted  in  this  respect.  I  have  already  performed  a  few 
experiments  of  this  kind  where,  however,  the  contents  of  Closterium 
moniliferum  was  displaced  only  a  few  times  successively.'  Approxi- 
mately no  difference  was  noticed  in  this  plant  when  centrifuged  suc- 
cessively a  few  times  and  the  specimens  kept  in  the  dark. 

I  have  more  recently  tried  the  same  experiments  on  Oedogonium 
ciliatum  with  similar  results.  The  following  four  experiments  will  show 
the  response  of  the  plant  when  centrifuged  15  minutes  at  26° C.  I  cen- 
trifuged Oedogonium  ciliatum,  using  1,500  gravities.  All  the  contents 
were  displaced  which  returned  in  the  light  in  7  days.  After  the  second 
centrifuging  the  contents  returned  in  6%  days.  After  the  third  centri- 
fuging  in  6  days  and  after  the  fourth  centrifuging  in  6V^  days.  Clearly, 
from  these  few  experiments,  the  protoplasm  is  apparently  not  detri- 
mentally affected  and  shows  that  a  large  number  of  such  experiments 
would  be  necessary  to  determine  this  point.  There  are  interesting  ques- 
tions to  be  ascertained  in  such  experiments,  among  them  being  that  of 
the  response  of  the  protoplasm  to  certain  stimuli  when  the  contents  are 
displaced. 


>Jarb<icher  fGr  wissenschaftlichen  Botanik.   1915,  Vol.  56,  pp.   229-233. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


177 


The  Effect  of  Aeration  on  the  Roots  of  Zea  Mays. — I. 


COLONZO  C.  Beals — Indiana  University. 


This  experiment  was  conducted  for  the  purpose  of  learning  the 
effect  of  aeration  on  the  roots  of  Zea  Mays.  In  water  cultures  as  com- 
monly conducted,  the  only  aeration  that  the  growing  plants  receive  comes 
from  the  surface  of  the  water. 


Effect  ofXaeration^on^rootfl  of  iSea  Mays. 

The  plants  were  grown  as  water  cultures  in  normal  solutions  minus 
the  sodium  chloride.  The  cylinders  used  had  a  capacity  of  one  and 
one-half  liters  and  the  solution  was  changed  at  frequent  intervals.  One 
cylinder  was  aerated  by  means  of  letting  a  stream  of  water  flow  through 
a  glass  tube  (a)  from  a  hydrant.  The  tube  protruded  slightly  through 
a  rubber  cork  fitting  tightly  in  the  larger  end  of  condensing  tube  that 
was  cut  in  two  pieces.  The  cork  should  have  an  opening  for  a  tube  to 
admit  air.  The  lower  end  of  the  tube  was  connected  to  a  second  one  (b) 
leading  to  a  cylinder  (d)  filled  with  water  resting  in  a  drain  pan.    The 

12—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


178 

larger  end  of  a  cutoff  condensing  tube  (c)  was  suspended  over  the  open 
end  of  the  small  bent  tube.  The  upper  end  was  connected  to  the  cylinder 
of  solution  by  a  glass  tube  (e)  which  extended  almost  to  the  bottom  of 
f.  All  connections  between  the  glass  tubes  were  made  by  tight-fitting 
rubber  tubing.  The  flow  of  air  was  regulated  by  varying  the  amount 
of  water  that  passed  through  the  hydrant.  A  drain  tube  carried  away 
the  excess  of  water  from  the  pan.  The  apparatus  stood  about  four  feet 
high  and  was  held  in  an  upright  position  by  a  ring-stand. 


F^-ar.Z 


Effect  of  aeration  on  roots  of  Zea  Mays 

This  apparatus  was  after  W.  Ostwald  as  given  in  his  Chemico-physi- 
cal  Measurements,  Aeration  of  plants  is  mentioned,  however,  by  Julius 
Sachs  in  his  Vorlesunger  iiher  Pflanzen-physiologiey  1887,  pages  268-269. 

The  glass  tube  fed  a  constant  supply  of  air  into  the  cylinder  of 
normal  solution.  The  two  plants  were  started  at  the  same  time  and 
received  like  treatment  except  the  aeration  of  the  solution. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


179 

The  following  table   gives  the  height  of  the  plants  at  different 
stages  of  growth: 

Aerated.  Nonaerated. 

2  days 2.8    cm.  1.9    cm. 

3  days 5.9    cm.  4.7    cm. 

6  days 14.50  cm.  12.00  cm. 

8  days 25.00  cm.  23.00  cm. 

11  days 28.00  cm.  24.00  cm. 

15  days 37.00  cm.  33.00  cm. 

20  days 47.00  cm.  37.00  cm. 

26   days 65.00  cm.  46.00  cm. 


Effect  of  nonaeration  on  roots  of  Zea  Mayts. 

After  three  months'  growth  in  the  greenhouse  under  as  nearly 
normal  growing  conditions  as  possible,  the  plants  were  removed  and 
burned.  The  ash  of  the  aerated  plant  including  the  roots  weighed  2.182 
grams,  while  the  ash  of  the  nonaerated  amounted  to  1.303  grams. 

A  cross-section  of  a  root  when  magnified  showed  that  the  cortex 
cells  of  the  aerated  plant  (Fig.  2)  were  uniform  in  size  with  no  con- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


180 

spicuous  air  cavities,  while  the  cortex  of  the  nonaerated  root  (Fig.  3) 
contained  large  air  cavities  separated  by  narrow  strands  of  tissue. 

This  experiment  shows  the  great  importance  of  the  presence  of  air 
not  only  for  the  normal  growth  of  plant  tissue  but  also  the  obtaining 
of  the  maximum  plant  growth. 

The  work  of  which  this  study  is  the  result  was  taken  up  at  the 
suggestion  of  Prof.  Andrews  of  the  Department  of  Plant  Physiology 
of  Indiana  University,  and  his  constant  interest  and  help  have  con- 
tributed to  its  completion. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


181 
Resistance  of  Mucor  Zygotes. 


Mildred  Nothnagel — Florida  Experiment  Station. 

In  the  fall  of  1916,  while  attending  Indiana  University,  various 
experiments  were  begun  to  test  out  the  resistance  of  Mucor  zygotes 
and  spores  to  desiccation,  to  heat,  and  to  different  chemicals. 

Fortunately  the  writer  had  a  good  culture  of  zygote  material  from 
which  fresh  zygotes  could  always  be  raised.  Since  the  zygotes  are  sup- 
posed to  be  more  resistant  than  the  asexual  spores,  the  experiments  were 
made  with  the  former  in  order  to  make  them  more  conclusive. 

After  sterilizing  the  bread,  inoculating  it  with  zygotes,  placing 
in  a  dark  place,  room  temperatures,  zygotes  in  unlimited  number  would 
be  found  in  5  to  7  days. 

The  work  was  carried  out  along  several  lines,  and  in  all  cases,  un- 
less otherwise  stated,  zygotes  that  had  been  just  freshly  matured,  and 
those  a  year  old,  were  used  in  order  to  make  comparison. 

Outline  of  Work. 

1.  Resistance  of  zygotes  to  desiccation. 

2.  Resistance  to  heat  of  zygotes  in  the  desiccator. 

3.  Resistance  to  heat  of  zygotes  upon  oven-dried  bread. 

4.  Resistance  to  heat  of  zygotes  placed  upon  bread  with  its  normal 
amount  of  moisture  present. 

5.  Resistance  to  heat  of  zygotes  in  presence  of  large  amount  of 
moisture. 

6.  Resistance  of  zygotes  to  various  chemicals. 

In  all  the  experiments  the  utmost  care  was  used  to  have  everything 
sterile  and,  in  case  water  or  nutrient  material  had  to  be  added,  every 
precaution  was  taken  so  that  spores  from  the  outside  would  not  be 
introduced.     Control  experiments  were  run  for  the  purpose  of  checking. 

1.  Resistance  of  Zygotes  to  Desiccation. — Into  sulphuric  acid  desic- 
cators were  placed  numerous  cultures  of  the  one-year  zygotes  as  well  as 
the  freshly  matured  zygotes  with  no  nutrient  material.    These  cultures 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


182 

were  left  in  this  environment  for  various  lengfths  of  time  ranging  from 
one  week  to  one  year.  At  the  end  of  these  respective  periods  the  small 
dish  with  the  mucTor  "within  it  was  removed,  and  with  the  utmost  care 
a  piece  of  moist,  sterilized  bread  was  introduced,  after  which  it  was 
set  aside  in  a  warm,  dark  place. 

In  all  cases  but  the  last  one  a  vigorous  growth  was  made  within 
seventy-two  (72)  hours  and  in  many  cases  zygotes  were  found  within 
a  week.  .««^ 

The  results  of  the  cultures  remaining  in  the  desiccator  for  one 
year  were  not  very  conclusive,  due  to  a  slight  accident.  The  culture 
of  the  zygotes,  that  was  freshly  matured  when  it  was  placed  in  the 
desiccator,  produced  growth  within  twenty-four  (24)  hours,  and  sporan- 
gia '^thin  forty-eight  (48)  hours,  but  the  culture  with  the  older  zygotes 
in  it  failed  to  grow  within  two  (2)  weeks  after  being  removed  from 
the  desiccator  and  moistened,  though  upon  further  moistening  a  vigorous 
growth  was  produced.  Unfortunately,  though,  when  the  culture  was 
being  moistened  the  second  time  the  lid  slid  oflF  for  an  instant  and  there 
is  a  slight  possibility  of  spores  from  the  outside  gaining  entrance. 

In  one  of  the  first  experiments  performed,  growth  failed  to  take 
place  until  further  moistening,  and  it  is  the  belief  of  the  author  that 
such  was  the  case  in  this  last  experiment. 

2.  Resistance  to  Heat  of  Zygotes  in  Desiccator,  —  Zygotes  were 
placed  upon  oven-dried  bread,  put  in  a  sulphuric  acid  desiccator,  and 
then  placed  in  an  oven  at  60  degrees  centrigrade  for  various  lengths  of 
time,  ranging  from  seventy-two  (72)  hours  to  five  (5)  weeks.  At  the 
end  of  these  periods  a  culture  would  be  removed  and  the  bread  moistened 
with  sterile  water.  In  all  the  cultures  the  zygotes  survived  the  heat, 
and  within  forty-eight  (48)  hours  after  being  removed  there  was  a 
vigorous  growth,  in  many  cases  zygotes  being  formed  within  a  week. 

Another  set  of  experiments  was  run  along  similar  lines,  through 
in  this  case  the  temperature  was  raised  to  seventy  (70)  degrees  centi- 
grade, the  time  ranging  from  one  week  to  one  month.  In  the  case  of 
the  freshly  matured  zygotes,  or  as  will  hereafter  be  termed  New  Zygotes, 
a  culture  was  able  to  survive  two  (2)  weeks  of  heat  and  desiccation, 
though  at  the  end  of  three  (3)  weeks,  no  growth  took  place  when 
placed  in  favorable  environment.     The  one  year  old  zygotes  were  not 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


183 

able  to  withstand  the  heat  and  desiccation  for.JaKo   (2)  weeks,  though 
the  culture  that  had  been  in  the  heat  for  one  week  germinated  readily. 

3.  Resistance  to  Heat  of  Zygotes  Upon  Oven-dried  Bread. — The 
bread  was  first  dried  in  an  oven,  the  temperature  of  which  was  kept* at 
110-120  degrees  centigrade  for  several  hours.  In  each  test  tube  was 
placed  a  small  cube  of  this  bread,  which  had  been  inoculated  with 
zygotes;  the  test  tubes  were  plugged  with  cotton,  and  then  placed  in 
the  oven  at  100  degrrees  centigrade  for  different  lengths  of  time^angfing 
in  close  series  from  1  min.  to  25  min.  After  the  cultures  were  removed 
and  allowed  to  cool  the  bread  was  moistened  with  sterile  water.  In 
every  instance,  up  to  and  including  those  remaining  in  the  heat  for 
17%  minutes,  zygotes  were  produced  within  a  week;  but  in  those  cul- 
tures remaining  in  the  heat  20,  22%,  and  25  minutes,  no  zygotes  were 
formed,  though  there  was  a  vigorous  growth. 

Other  cultures  were  placed  in  the  oven  at  a  temperature  of  60 
degrees  centigrade.  This  experiment  is  scarcely  complete,  since  the 
various  lengths  of  time  were  not  close  enough  together  to  warrant  any 
conclusions.  Cultures  remaining  in  this  heat  for  one  week  grew  vigor- 
ously after  being  removed  to  suitable  environment;  but  those  remaining 
in  the  heat  for  five  weeks  failed  to  germinate  after  being  removed  to 
room  temperature  and  moistened. 

The  third  set  of  experiments  under  this  heading  was  placed  in  an 
oven  at  seventy  (70)  degrees  centigrade,  the  duration  being  from  four 
(4)  days  to  three  (3)  weeks.  New  zygotes  produced  growth  after  they 
had  remained  at  seventy  (70)  degrees  centigrade  for  two  (2)  weeks, 
though  at  the  end  of  three  (3)  weeks  there  was  no  sign  of  germina- 
tion. Old  zygotes  did  not  resist  the  heat  as  long,  the  longest  duration 
being  one  week. 

4.  Resistance  to  Heat  of  Zygotes  in  Presence  of  Small  Amount  of 
Moisture. — In  these  cultures  the  amount  of  moisture  was  that  which  is 
ordinarily  found  in  fresh  bread.  Experiments  placed  in  the  oven  at 
sixty  (60)  degrrees  centigrade  for  one  week  showed  no  growth  after 
being  removed  to  favorable  environment  and  neither  did  cultures  after 
being  in  the  oven  for  only  forty-eight  (48)  hours  at  this  temperature. 

5.  Resistance  to  Heat  of  Zygotes  in  Presence  of  Large  Amount  of 
Moisture. — These  experiments  were  performed,  first,  by  thoroughly  soak- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


184 

ing  small  cubes  of  bread,  placing  one  in  each  test  tube,  sterilizing  them, 
and  then  inoculating  the  bread;  after  which  the  test  tubes  were  tightly 
plugged  and  placed  in  warm  water  the  temperature  of  which  ranged 
from  forty-five  (45)  to  seventy  (70)  degrees  centigrade. 

The  following  table  will  give  the  temperature  and  the  longest  time 
for  each  of  these  temperatures  that  the  zygotes  were  able  to  remain 
in  it,  and  still  retain  the  power  of  germination. 


TABLE  I. 

70'C. 

WC. 

eo'C. 

55-C. 

50«C. 

45*0. 

40*C. 

1  yr..  Zygotes 

New  Zygotes 

0  min. 
Omin. 

I  min. 
3  min. 

2  min. 
5  min. 

4  min. 
10  min. 

10  min. 
15  min. 

30*  min. 
30»min. 

45*  min. 
45*  min. 

*Exporimenta  of  longer  duration  were  not  made  for  this  temperature. 

6.  Resistance  of  Zygotes  to  Various  Chemicals. — The  resistance 
of  the  zygote  and  the  growing  mycelium  toward  a  few  chemicals  was 
tested  out.  Molecular  solutions  of  NaCl  (common  salt),  FciClo  12H30, 
CuSOi,  and  CiHdOH  (ethyl  alcohol)  were  the  solutions  used  and  were 
the  only  moisture  that  the  germinating  zygotes  and  growing  mycelia 
received.  Oven-dried  bread  was  moistened  with  the  chemical  and  then 
inoculated  with  zygotes  after  which  the  cultures  were  set  aside  in  a 
warm,  dark  place  to  germinate.  The  first  column  of  Table  II  indi- 
cates the  highest  molecular  solution,  or  fraction  of  molecular  solution, 
in  which  the  zygotes  and  the  mycelia  would  grow;  while  the  second 
column  shows  the  same  in  terms  of  per  cent  of  the  chemical  in  solution. 
Column  three  gives  the  highest  molecular  solution  in  which  a  vigorous 
growth  took  place,  the  last  column  indicating  the  same  thing  in  per 
cent  of  the  chemical  in  solution. 


TABLE  IL 


Highest  Concentration  in 
which  Growth  Occurred. 


Highest  Concentration  in  which 
a  Vigorous  Growth  Occurred. 


I        Mol.  Sol. 

%  Sol. 

Mol.  Sol. 

%Sol. 

NftCl 

FciCl.  12H/) 

CuS()4 

C.HiOH 

1 

I            Mol. 

..    .    .     1           M/11 

M/70 

3M-f 

5.48% 
1.2^ 
.213'7 
13.S%-f 

M/10 
1           M/15 

M/150 
1           2M 

.548% 

.808';; 

.0994% 
9.2% 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


185 


Discussion. 


It  has  been  generally  thought  that  zygote  material  of  Mucor  would 
not  retain  the  power  of  germination  for  more  than  one  year,  but  the 
first  experiment  demonstrated  that  they  retained  this  power  for  at 
least  two  years,  one  year  of  which  they  were  entirely  without  moisture. 
Since  this  is  the  case  one  might  expect  to  find  the  zygotes  in  the  air  for 
a  longer  period  than  that. 

When  heat  was  added  as  a  factor,  a  remarkable  power  of  resistance 
was  still  shown.  How  long  the  zygotes  would  be  able  to  resist  the 
sixty  (60)  degrees  centigrade  in  a  desiccator  remains  to  be  seen,  as 
five  (5)  weeks  was  the  longest  period  tried.  When  the  temperature 
was  raised  to  seventy  (70)  degrees  centigrade  the  old  zygotes  showed 
the  lesser  resistance,  not  being  able  to  withstand  the  heat  for  as  long  a 
period  as  the  newly  matured  ones. 

When  the  temperature  was  seventy  (70)  degrees  centigrade  the 
inoculated  oven-dried  bread  resisted  to  the  same  extent  as  those  in 
the  desiccator,  though  when  the  temperature  was  sixty  (60)  degrees 
centigrade  the  inoculated  oven-dried  bread  was  not  able  to  stand  the 
heat  as  long  as  the  zygotes  in  the  desiccator.  How  near  it  would  come 
to  it  was  not  ascertained.  The  only  explanation  that  the  author  can 
give  is  that  the  amount  of  moisture  that  would  be  present  at  sixty  (60) 
degrees  centigrade  in  the  oven  would  be  sufficient  to  be  detrimental  to 
the  zygotes. 

Those  experiments  in  which  the  zygotes  were  placed  upon  oven- 
dried  bread  in  an  oven  at  one  hundred  (100)  degrees  centigrade  would 
have  practically  the  same  degree  of  desiccation  as  the  three  experiments 
that  were  placed  in  the  desiccators.  In  this  experiment  there  is  shown 
the  most  remarkable  case  of  resistance,  twenty-five  (25)  minutes  in 
this  heat  not  being  sufilcient  to  kill  the  zygotes;  but  another  interesting 
fact  is  brought  out,  that  being,  that  the  ability  of  the  mucor  to  produce 
zygotes  is  gone  from  those  cultures  remaining  in  the  heat  over  17% 
minutes. 

According  to  the  present  understanding  of  the  formation  of  zygotes, 
there  must  be  what  is  termed  "two  strains."  By  the  term  "strain"  the 
author  means  not  different  varieties,  but  what  in  higher  plants  would 
probably  be  called  male  and  female  plants.  In  other  words,  there  is 
a  differentiation  of  mycelial  threads,  the  union  of  the  two   (2)   being 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


186 


1 

M 

c 

o 

M 

— 

|! 

11 

^    .5 

£     S 

_    .5 

£     S 

o 

S  1 

^    .S 

CO 

s    + 

S     if 

o      + 
O       "^ 

o      is 

g     if 

c 
S      S 

9 

^  .s 

§   e 

2     S 
"^     o 

^    .5 
S     S 
^    12 

p 
« 

^ 

s 

-- 

c 

S     E 
G    -1- 

.5 

.5 

.9 

^ 

I-' 

15 

1 
c 

'i 
1 

N 

1 

.s 

1 

> 

I 

1 

1 

1 

• 

1 
z 

] 

I 

> 
1 

1 

i 

H 

1 

X 

"a 

•c 

E 

g 

> 

1 

2; 

; 

II 


I 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


187 

necessary  for  the  formation  of  the  zygote.  If  this  is  the  case,  then 
one  of  the  "strains"  must  be  weaker  than  the  other  and  killed  out  by 
the  unfavorable  conditions,  since  zygotes  were  not  formed  in  those 
cultures  that  had  remained  in  the  one  hundred  (100)  centigrade  heat 
for  more  than  17%  minutes. 

The  difference  in  the  resistance  between  the  old  and  the  new  zygote 
material  in  this  set  of  experiments  was  not  ascertained,  as  only  the  new 
was  used. 

When  moisture  was  added  as  a  factor,  even  when  the  amount  was 
small,  the  resistance  of  the  zygotes  to  the  heat  declined  rapidly.  With 
the  amount  of  moisture  ordinarily  found  in  bread  it  was  found  to  be 
sufficient  to  kill  the  zygotes  in  less  than  forty-eight  (48)  hours,  when 
the  temperature  was  raised  to  seventy  (70)  degrees  centigrade,  the  time 
probably  being  only  a  matter  of  minutes  as  can  be  seen  from  comparing 
the  results  of  the  different  experiments  as  shown  in  Table  III. 

In  case  there  was  a  large  amount  of  moisture  there  was  a  very 
great  dropping  off  of  the  power  of  resistance  and  also  a  marked  differ- 
ence in  the  resistant  power  of  the  old  and  the  newly  matured  zygotes. 
The  rapid  decline  is  when  the  temperature  reaches  fifty  (50)  degrees 
centigrade.  How  long  the  zygotes  would  resist  the  temperature  of 
forty-five  (45)  and  forty  (40)  degrees  centigrade  was  not  ascertained. 

From  a  general  survey  of  all  the  experiments  (See  Table  III)  it 
will  be  seen  that  the  zygotes  are  able  to  withstand  a  large  amount  of 
heat  as  long  as  no  moisture  is  present;  but  the  addition  of  only  a  slight 
amount  causes  the  resistant  power  to  fall  off  very  rapidly.  Also  the 
factor  of  dessication  is  a  very  small  factor,  if  any,  in  the  lowering  of 
the  vitality  of  the  zygote.  On  the  other  hand  it  is  a  decided  factor  in 
increasing  the  power  of  resistance  to  heat. 

If,  then,  one  wishes  to  kill  mucor,  the  surest  way  to  do  so  is  to  use 
heat  and  moisture,  not  much  heat  being  necessary  in  this  case;  while  if 
moisture  is  not  present  a  high  temperature  and  a  long  application  will 
be  required. 

To  Dr.  F.  M.  Andrews  of  Indiana  University,  I  wish  to  express  my 
appreciation  for  the  encouragement  and  assistance  given  during  the 
progress  of  the  work.  The  author  also  wishes  to  express  her  apprecia- 
tion for  the  help  that  Miss  Flpra  Anderson  rendered  in  completing  some 
of  the  experiments. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


189 


The  Absorption  of  Iron  by  Platinum  Crucibles  in  Clay 

Fusions. 


W.  M.  Blanchard  and  Roscoe  Theibert — DePauw  University. 


A  short  time  ago  on  making  a  number  of  clay  analyses,  we  were 
surprised  at  the  persistent  gain  in  weight  of  our  platinum  crucibles  and 
the  repeated  appearance  of  ferric  oxide  after  reheating  a  crucible  that 
had  been  used  in  making  a  fusion.  No  note  of  such  phenomena  could 
be  found  in  the  standard  treatises  on  analytical  chemistry  at  hand,  no 
mention  of  the  absorption  of  iron  by  platinum  being  mentioned  by 
Fresenius,  Treadwell  and  Hall,  Olsen,  Morse,  or  Scott.  The  only  men- 
tion of  such  action  to  be  found  in  the  literature  available  was  in  a  paper 
by  Sosman  and  Hostetter,  Jour.  Washington  Academy,  5,  293-303,  and 
only  a  synopsis  as  given  in  Chem.  Abstracts,  9,  1580,  was  at  hand.  In 
this  paper  account  is  given  of  experiments  made  on  the  heating  of 
hematite  and  magnetite  in  platinum  crucibles  at  high  temperatures, 
resulting  in  the  absorption  of  iron  and  the  loss  of  oxygen.  The  state- 
ment is  made  that  it  is  a  generally  known  fact  that  platinum  crucibles 
will  absorb  small  quantities  of  iron  when  heated  to  high  temperatures 
with  ferric  oxide.  In  this  synopsis  in  Chemical  Abstracts  no  reference 
is  made  to  any  published  data. 

If  a  sample  of  ordinary  clay  is  mixed  with  the  usual  amount  of 
sodium  carbonate  and  the  mixture  fused  in  the  usual  manner,  the  cru- 
cible will  present  the  appearance  of  perfectly  clean  platinum  when  the 
product,  on  cooling,  is  removed  by  the  treatment  with  hydrochloric 
acid.  If  this  crucible  is  now  heated  for  several  minutes  over  the  blast 
lamp  or  No.  3  Meeker  burner,  the  lower  third  of  the  inside  of  the  cru- 
cible will  have  an  appearance  varying  from  that  of  ordinary  ferric 
oxide  to  that  of  certain  bronzes.  If  strong  hydrochloric  acid  is  now 
added  and  the  crucible  heated  gently,  what  appears  to  be  a  rather 
strong  solution  of  ferric  chloride  is  obtained.  If  this  is  removed,  the 
crucible  will  have  again  the  appearance  of  clean  platinum,  but,  in  many 
cases,  when  heated  a  second  time,  more  iron  will  be  driven  to  the  sur- 
face and  converted  into  ferric  oxide.     In  some  cases  it  has  been  found 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


190 

necessary  to  subject  the  crucible  to  several  successive  heatings  and 
treatment  with  strong  hydrochloric  acid  in  order  to  remove  all  of  the 
iron  absobed  in  a  single  fusion. 

In  order  to  determine  whether  this  amount  of  iron  is  what  might 
be  considered  merely  a  "trace''  or  whether  it  is  sufficient  to  make  an 
appreciable  difference  in  the  results  of  a  quantitative  analysis,  several 
determinations  were  made.  A  platinum  crucible  was  heated  to  constant 
weight  after  it  had  been  subjected  a  number  of  times  to  the  treatment 
just  mentioned.  A  clay  fusion  was  then  made  and  the  product  removed 
by  the  aid  of  20  per  cent  hydrochloric  acid.  The  heating  and  treat- 
ment with  the  acid  was  then  repeated  until  no  further  change  was 
observed.  The  combined  solutions  of  ferric  chloride  was  reduced  with 
stannous  chloride,  excess  of  mercuric  chloride  added,  and  the  amount 
of  iron  determined  by  means  of  a  standard  solution  of  potassium 
dichromate.    Some  of  the  results  obtained  are  as  follows: 

Weight  of  platinum  crucible  (from  previous  fusion)  after  successive 
heatings  over  an  ordinary  burner: 

25.0089     25.0089     25.0090     25.0089 
Same  crucible  after  successive  heatings  of  fifteen  minutes   each 
over  a  Meeker  burner: 

25.0097     25.0097     25.0095     25.0097 
After  treatment  with  the  acid  and  complete  removal  of  the  iron: 
25.0089     25.0090     25.0090     25.0089     25.0089 

A  fusion  of  a  mixture  of  0.5  gram  of  clay  and  2.5  grams  of  sodium 
carbonate  was  then  made  and  the  product  removed  by  the  aid  of  the 
acid.    Successive  heatings  over  the  Meeker  burner,  each  followed  by  re- 
moval of  the  iron  present,  left  the  crucible  weighing  as  follows: 
25.0099     25.0097     25.0099     25.0103 
After  removal  of  the  iron  successive  heatings  gave 

25.0089     25.0084     25.0088 
After  further  treatment  with  the  acid  and  successive  heatings,  the 
weights  ran  as  follows: 

25.0084     25.0083     25.0084     25.0081     25.0081     25.0082 
The  total  amount  of  iron  oxide  found  by  titration  with  the  potassium 
dichromate  was  0.00459  gram. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


191 

After  a  third  fusion,  removal  of  the  product,  and  heating  over  the 
Meeker  burner  the  crucible  weighed 

25.0097     25.0098 
After  removal  of  the  ferric  oxide  and  reheating, 
25.0080    25.0080    25.0080       25.0080 
Amount  of  ferric  oxide  by  titration,  0.0068  gram. 

After  a  fourth  fusion,  removal  of  fusion  product,  successive  heat- 
ings gave 

25.0103     25.0100    25.0100 
After  removal  of  the  iron  oxide, 

25.0085     25.0085 
Total  amount  of  ferric  oxide  by  titration,  0.0051. 

It  seems  that  in  fusing  the  clay  and  sodium  carbonate  mixture  a 
very  small  amount  the  ferric  oxide  formed,  or  the  ferrous  oxide  present 
is  reduced,  the  iron  dissolving  in  the  platinum.  When  the  crucible  is 
afterwards  heated  to  a  high  temperature,  the  iron  is  driven  to  the  sur- 
face and  reoxidized,  thereby  becoming  soluble  in  the  acid. 

It  was  thought  that  this  might  be  prevented  by  adding  a  small 
amount  of  potassium  nitrate  to  the  fusion  mixture  before  making  the 
fusion.    A  few  experiments  were  made  to  test  this  hypothesis. 

Weight  of  the  crucible  before  fusion,  25.0079. 

1*0  the  mixture  of  0.5  gram  clay  and  2.5  grams  sodium  carbonate 
was  added  0.3  gram  pure  potassium  nitrate,  the  fusion  made  and  the 
product  removed  in  the  usual  way.  The  crucible  was  then  heated  eight 
times,  fifteen  minutes  each,  and  weighed  after  each  heating,  the  ferric 
oxide  being  removed  before  the  succeeding  heating.  The  weights  were 
as  follows: 

25.0104    25.0103    25.0103    25.0103    25.0091    25.0087    25.0079    25.0079 
The  total  amount  of  ferric  oxide  obtained  by  titration,  0.0021  gn^am. 

A  second  fusion  with  the  addition  of  0.5  gram  of  potassium  nitrate 
brought  the  weights  of  the  crucible  to  the  following: 

25.0125     25.0122     25.0121     25.0120     25.0120     25.0120 
The  total  amount  of  ferric  oxide  by  titration,  0.0015  gn^am. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


192 

A  third  fusion,  using  again  0.5  grsim  of  potassium  nitrate  resulted 
in  the  following  weights: 

25.0154     25.0152     25.0149     25.0149     25.0149     25.0149 

No  ferric  oxide  was  detected  by  titration  although  a  trace  of  ferric 
oxide  was  observed  in  the  crucible. 

A  fourth  trial  with  0.5  gram  of  the  nitrate  resulted  as  follows: 
25.0182     25.0181     25.0181     25.0178     25.0170     25.0165     25.0165 
Total  amount  of  ferric  oxide  by  titration,  0.0025  gram. 

It  will  be  seen  that  the  amount  of  iron  absorbed  by  the  crucible 
is  sufficient  to  be  taken  into  account  in  making  an  accurate  analysis. 
In  other  words,  after  making  a  clay  fusion,  the  crucible  should  be 
heated  to  a  high  temperature  and  the  ferric  oxide  formed  dissolved 
out  and  added  to  the  vessel  containing  the  main  fusion  product.  Fur- 
thermore, it  is  seen  that  treatment  with  potassium  nitrate  is  not  a 
satisfactory  way  of  avoiding  the  trouble,  for  while  it  does  prevent  the 
absorption  of  the  iron  to  a  large  degree,  it  is  the  means  of  introducing 
other  foreign  substances  into  the  crucible  which  may  prove  undesirable. 

That  this  absorption  of  iron  is  not  a  peculiarity  of  this  particular 
crucible,  due  to  the  presence  of  some  other  metal  alloyed  with  the 
platinum,  would  seem  to  be  indicated  by  the  fact  that  the  same  phe- 
nomenon was  observed  in  connection  with  two  other  crucibles  purchased 
at  different  times  and  from  different  dealers;  that  it  was  not  due  to 
some  unusual  property  of  this  particular  clay  is  evidenced  by  the  fact 
that  the  same  thing  occurred  with  clays  obtained  from  widely  different 
sections  of  the  State. 

A  further  study  of  this  behavior  is  in  progress. 

Since  the  above  paper  was  submitted  for  publication,  the  chief  cause 
of  the  phenomena  described  has  been  discovered.  The  crucibles  in  which 
the  fusions  were  made  were  heated  over  Meeker  burners.  In  order  that 
they  might  be  heated  to  the  highest  temperature  obtainable  from  these 
burners  the  crucibles  were  supported  just  above  the  top  of  the  burners. 
As  a  result  they  were  more  or  less  enveloped  in  an  atmosphere  of  re- 
ducing gases  and  it  was  due  to  these  gases  rather  than  to  the  organic 
matter  in  the  clay  that  the  iron  was  brought  to  a  condition  to  be  ab- 
sorbed by  the  platinum.    When  these  fusions  are  made  with  a  good  blast 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


193 

lamp  directed  upon  the  crucible  at  a  considerable  angle,  practically  no 
iron  is  afterwards  found  in  the  platinum.  It  is  probably  because  these 
burners  have  not  generally  been  used  for  this  purpose  that  this  phe- 
nomenon has  not  been  observed  by  others.  It  is  clear  that  the  Meeker 
burner  is  not  a  satisfactory  substitute  for  the  blast  l^mp  in  making 
fusions  of  clays  or  silicates  that  contain  appreciable  amounts  of  iron. 


13—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


195 

The  Injurious  Effect  of  Borax  in  Fertilizers  on  Corn. 


S.  D.  CoNNERr— Purdue  University. 

About  June  1,  1917,  the  Experiment  Station  was  notified  that  in  a 
large  number  of  fields  near  Francesville  the  young  growing  com  had 
lost  its  green  color  and  had  turned  white  or  had  entirely  wilted  down. 
Together  with  Mr.  O.  S.  Roberts  of  the  State  Chemist's  Department,  I 
visited  the  cornfields  on  June  5th.  We  found  a  number  of  fields 
where  the  corn  was  entirely  white.  The  damage  was  all  on  land 
where  fertilizer  was  used,  and  by  far  the  greatest  damage  was  caused 
where  fertilizer  containing  5  per  cent  of  potash  and  5  per  cent  of 
available  phosphoric  acid  had  been  used.  There  appeared  to  be  no 
question  about  the  fertilizer  having  caused  the  damage  as  in  a  number 
of  fields  one  or  more  rows  of  unfertilized  corn  remained  good  alongside 
of  badly  damaged  fertilized  com.  In  some  fields  several  amounts  of 
fertilizer  had  been  used  and  the  damage  was  greatest  where  the  largest 
amounts  of  fertilizer  were  used.  The  fertilizer  injured  the  com  by  re- 
tarding germination,  also  by  turning  the  com  white  and  holding  it 
back  so  that  insect  damage  was  greater  where  the  com  was  fertilized, 
and  in  some  cases  the  corn  had  even  been  killed.  Some  of  the  com 
which  was  not  damaged  very  badly  was  said  by  the  farmers  to  be  look- 
ing better  than  it  had  a  few  days  before.  .  Later  reports  indicate  that 
some  of  the  white  com  recovered  almost  entirely  while  other  fields  had 
to  be  replanted,  while  still  other  fields  remained  more  or  less  dam- 
aged even  to  time  of  harvest. 

On  September  24th  another  visit  was  made  to  the  damaged  fields. 
Some  of  the  com  had  been  i>ermanently  damaged  probably  seventy 
per  cent.,  other  fields  much  less  and  in  some  cases  there  was  no  ap- 
parent damage.  The  damage  seemed  to  vary  on  different  types  of  soil, 
some  of  the  worst  was  on  light  sandy  and  some  on  peaty  soils.  As  a 
rule  there  was  not  so  much  damage  on  heavier  soils.  Corn  fertilizer 
in  Indiana  is  generally  drilled  along  the  row  where  the  com  is  checked 
or  drilled.  Fifty  pounds  of  the  5-5  fertilizer  per  acre  seldom  caused 
much  damage,  while  200  pounds  to  the  acre  nearly  always  caused  great 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


198 

damage.  Some  farmers  seemed  to  think  that  a  fertilizer  attachment 
with  a  spreader  was  better  than  an  attachment  that  placed  the  fertilizer 
directly  on  the  seed.  Differences  in  amount  of  injury  were  undoubtedly 
caused  by  the  different  weather  conditions,  such  as  rain  either  just 
before  or  after  planting. 

All  farmers  who  had  used  fertilizer  which  caused  damage  to  the 
corn  and  who  made  complaint  have  been  compensated  by  the  fertilizer 
company  selling  the  goods.  The  amount  of  damage  was  mutually 
agreed  upon  by  the  farmer  and  a  representative  of  the  fertilizer  com- 
pany with  O.  S.  Roberts,  Chief  Inspector  of  the  State  Chemist's  De- 
partment of  the  Experiment  Station,  acting  as  a  disinterested  referee. 

Experimental  Work. 

To  find  the  cause  of  the  damage,  the  writer  secured  a  sample  of 
the  5-5  fertilizer  which  produced  damage  in  one  of  the  fields.  Upon 
analysis  this  sample  was  found  to  contain  2.35  per  cent  boric  acid 
(HsBOa)  equivalent  to  1.92  per  cent  borax  (Na2B407)  soluble  in  water. 
Borax  is  an  ingredient  not  usually  found  in  fertilizer.  It  has  been 
found  by  other  investigators  to  be  harmful  when  used  in  very  large 
amounts.* 

With  the  assumption  that  borax  might  be  the  harmful  ingredient, 
quantities  of  soil  were  obtained  from  the  field  near  Francesville  dam- 
aged by  the  particular  sample  of  5-5  fertilizer  analyzed;  also  soil  from 
the  Experiment  Station  farm.  The  Francesville  soil  is  a  black  sandy 
loam  neutral  in  reaction.  The  Purdue  soil  is  brown  silt  loam,  acid  in 
reaction.  Ten  earthenware  pots  were  filled  with  each  type  of  <=oil  and 
fertilizer  applied  as  follows: 
Pot.  No. 

1.  No  treatment. 

2.  50  lbs.  per  acre  in  row  of  5-5  fertilizer  sold. 

3.  100  lbs.  per  acre  in  row  of  5-5  fertilizer  sold. 

4.  200  lbs.  per  acre  in  row  of  5-5  fertilizer  sold. 

5.  200  lbs  per  acre  broadcast  of  5-5  fertilizer  sold. 

6.  100  lbs.  per  acre  in  row  5-5  fertilizer  made  in  laboratory.    No 

borax. 

1  Cook.  T.  C.  and  Wilson.  J.  B.  in  Jour.  Asr.  Res..  Vol.  X.  No.  12,  1917  :  also  Naka- 
mura  In  Bui.  Col.  Akt.,  Tokyo,  1903  ;  also  Voclcker  in  Jour.  Roy.  A«:r.  Soc..  Vol.  76,  1915. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


199 

7.  200  lbs.     Same  as  No.  6. 

8.  100  lbs.  per  acre  in  row  of  5-5  fert.  made  in  laboratory  with 

2  per  cent  borax. 

9.  200  lbs.    Same  as  No.  8. 

10.     200  lbs.  per  acre  broadcast  5-5  fert.  made  in  laboratory  with 
2   per  cent  borax. 

Where  the  fertilizer  was  applied  in  the  row,  the  soil  was  furrowed 
out  and  the  fertilizer  applied,  then  the  corn  dropped  in  the  same  furrow 
and  covered.  The  broadcast  application  was  worked  in  the  entire  sur- 
face of  the  pot  two  inches  deep.  Corn  was  planted  October  8,  1917, 
and  the  pots  were  kept  uniformly  watered  in  a  greenhouse. 

The  notes  in  Table  I  indicate  the  results  on  the  test  up  to  January 
1,  1918.  Figures  1  and  2  show  the  appearance  of  the  corn  November 
26th. 

The  results  obtained  in  this  pot  test  show  that  without  doubt  the 
commercial  5-5  fertilizer  containing  1.92  per  cent  borax  will  injure 
com  if  applied  in  the  row  100  lbs.  or  more  to  the  acre.  Fifty  pounds 
to  the  acre  caused  no  damage. 

The  damage  is  caused  by  preventing  germination,  by  bleaching  the 
leaves  of  the  young  com  and  by  stunting  or  killing  the  young  plant. 
This  injury  is  identical  to  that  which  was  noted  in  the  field. 

A  5-5  fertilizer  made  from  kainit  and  acid  phosphate  did  not  bleach 
leaves  or  kill  the  plants  when  used  100  or  200  pounds  in  the  row.  In 
the  200  lb.  application,  this  fertilizer  caused  some  temporary  stunting 
which  later  disappeared. 

An  artificial  5-5  fertilizer  with  2  per  cent  borax  added  caused  bleach- 
ing and  even  worse  damage  than  the  commercial  sample  did. 

When  the  fertilizer  was  applied  200  lbs.  to  the  acre  broadcast  that 
containing  borax  caused  a  slight  bleaching  but  no  permanent  injury. 

There  seems  absolutely  no  question  but  that  2  per  cent  borax  in  a 
fertilizer  when  used  100  pounds  to  the  acre  in  the  row  will  bleach  the 
leaves  of  the  corn  plant  and  cause  more  or  less  permanent  injury. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


201 


Chemical  Estimation  of  the  Fertility  of  Soils  in  Fulton 
County,  Indiana. 

R.  H.  Carr  and  W.  K.  Gast— Purdue  University. 

During  recent  years  there  has  been  an  effort  on  the  part  of  many 
States  to  invoice  their  soils  as  to  plant  food  content  in  addition  to  mak- 
ing the  usual  survey  in  order  to  classify  them  into  types  and  series. 
This  invoice  is  useful  first  to  the  farmer  in  pointing  out  any  deficiencies 
or  excesses  in  the  soil's  food  supply,  and  second  to  the  State  in  estimat- 
ing the  wealth,  since  this  usually  resides  in  the  fertility  of  the  soils. 
Usually  only  the  plant  food  elements  are  determined  which  seem  to  be 
the  most  important  or  have  the  greatest  influence  in  modifying  crop 
yield.  They  are  the  following:  total  organic  carbon,  total  nitrogen, 
total  phosphorus,  total  potassium,  total  calcium,  total  inorganic  carbon. 
The  test  for  the  last  is  made  for  the  presence  of  limestone,  the  absence 
of  which  often  indicates  soil  acidity.  There  are  many  factors  other 
than  plant  food  concerned  in  producing  a  crop  on  any  piece  of  land, 
as  rainfall,  tillage,  drainage,  etc.,  but  deficiencies  in  these  can  be  de- 
termined often  by  observation.  But  a  deficiency  in  the  main  chemical 
elements  is  not  so  easily  estimated  and  is  a  matter  of  life  or  death  to  the 
plant. 

Availability  of  Plant  Food. 

Much  discussion  has  arisen  over  the  availability  of  these  plant  foods 
even  when  analysis  has  shown  plenty  to  be  present.  It  is  conceded, 
however,  that  it  is  possible  to  make  two  per  cent  of  total  nitrogen,  one 
per  cent  of  phosphorus  and  one-fourth  of  one  per  cent  of  potassium 
available  in  one  year  by  approved  agriculture  methods.  If  this  were 
true,  or  somewhere  near  true,  it  would  make  a  big  difference  in  the 
crop  yield  to  be  expected  whether  there  were  500  or  5,000  lbs.  of  phos- 
phorus or  nitrogen,  etc.,  present  per  acre  to  a  depth  of  six  and  two- 
thirds  inches. 

Plant  Foods  Present  in  a  Good  Soil. 

It  is  difficult  to  set  a  definite  standard  of  plant  food  content,  but  if 
we  choose  samples  of  our  productive  loam  soils  frequently  producing 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


202 

75  bushels  of  com  per  acre,  we  find  a  plant  food  content  about  as 
follows : 

Pounds  of  Plant  Food  Per  2,000,000  Pounds  of  Surface  Soil. 

Nitrogen  4,500  lbs.,  2  per  cent  possible  available  in  1  year 90  lbs. 

Phosphorus  1,500  lbs.  (too  low) ,  1  per  cent 15  lbs. 

Potassium  32,000  lbs.,  one-fourth  of  one  per  cent 80  lbs. 

Organic  matter,  160,500  lbs. 
Limestone  present,  350  lbs. 

A  50-bushel  corn  crop  would  need  about  74  lbs.  of  nitrogen,  11.5 
lbs.  of  phosphorus  and  35.5  lbs.  of  potassium  in  addition  to  the  other 
essential  elements  usually  present,  and  this  amount  of  plant  food  could 
more  than  be  supplied  in  a  soil  like  the  above. 

Plan  of  Invoicing  Fulton  County  Soils. 

The  soil  samples  chosen  numbered  128  and  they  were  collected  from 
the  eight  townships.  Most  of  the  soil  samples  were  taken  from 
surface  soil  (7  ins.  deep),  but  38  were  from  subsoils  (6  to  20  ins.). 
Twenty  of  the  samples  were  from  virgin  soil  and  represent  more  or 
less  the  original  fertility  of  the  soil  unchanged  by  cropping.  Many 
items  were  noted  while  the  samples  were  being  collected  (August,  1916) 
or  information  was  secured  from  the  people  living  on  the  farms  as  to 
the  prevalent  weeds,  stand  of  clover,  kinds  of  timber,  grain  yield  per 
acre,  use  of  fertilizers  and  manures,  etc.  The  following  determinations 
were  made  on  the  soil  samples:  first,  total  organic  matter;  second,  total 
nitrogen;  third,  total  phosphorus;  fourth,  presence  of  carbonates  and 
acidity  to  litmus.  An  attempt  was  made  to  correlate  this  data  with 
the  yield  of  com  per  acre.  It  was  thought  this  could  be  done  best  by 
means  of  graphs.  Since  the  presence  or  absence  of  organic  matter  is 
so  vitally  related  to  crop  yield,  the  soils  were  grouped  into  eight  series 
depending  on  the  amount  of  organic  matter  present  in  the  soil.  The 
samples  are  numbered  as  follows: 

Richland  Twp.,  1-10  and  108-111,  inclusive. 
Aubbeenaubbee,  11-19  and  106-107. 
Henry,  20-24  and  124-128. 
Newcastle,  25-27  and  112-123. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


203 

Rochester,  28-31  and  45-60  also  66. 
Liberty,  61-65  and  67-75. 
Wayne,  76-87  and  91-93. 
Union,  80-90  and  94-105. 

The  tables  and  graphs  which  follow  will  give  a  partial  composition 
of  the  soil  in  per  cents  and  pounds  per  acre  and  express  this  in  termu 
of  bushels  of  corn  i)er  yield. 

TABLE  I. 
The  N.  P.  and  Orgainic  Matter,  from  0.5  to  1^;  Orfcanic  Matter. 


Sample 

%  ().  M. 

Pounds  per 

No. 

Acre. 

I 

9  Subsoil 

.5143 

10,286 

2 

116  Subsoil 

.6664 

13.328 

3 

87  SubBOJl 

.6789 

13.578 

4 

103  Subsoil 

.7945 

15.89U 

5 

16  Subaoil 

.8014 

16,028 

6 

•68  Subeoil 

.8046 

16.092 

7 

2  Subsoil 

.8614 

17.228 

* 

79  Subsoil 

.9824 

19.648 

%N. 

Pounds  per 

%  P. 

Pounds  per 

Acre 

.Acre. 

.014 

280 

.0243 

486 

.017 

340 

.(H62 

924 

015 

300 

0725 

1.450 

.0042 

84 

0576 

1.152 

014 

280 

.0674 

1.348 

.027 

540 

.0364 

728 

00H4 

168 

.0553 

1,106 

.021 

420 

0580 

1.160 

•Acid. 


r^^SB^Ti   ^ 

Ski.  L^?^'%^Hr"""^^^^ 

1    L.-«^L^H|i^^|f^?yy^***"'  .>«#.J-J — ^....^^^H^^B 

wS£k^  ^'^^^^ 

iZ3,tl-^5rJ3 1. 

E^  ::^':^,ca  '  "^  *  "  ^ 

cr:— — — ^ 

v.  J  ^•-*«'  -^ 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


204 


TABLE  II. 
The  N.  P.  and  Organic  Matter,  from  I  to  2%  Organic  Matter. 


Sample 

%0.  M. 

Pounds  per 

TcN. 

Pounds  per 

%P. 

Pounds  per 

No. 

Acre. 

Acre. 

Acre. 

1 

12  Subsoil 

1  141 

22,820 

.025 

500 

0320 

640 

2 

98  Subsoil 

1.158 

23.160 

.015 

300 

0539 

1,078 

3 

5  Subsoil 

1  171 

23.420 

OIK 

360 

03S1 

762 

4 

•33  Subsoil 

1  233 

24.460 

.011 

220 

.0«4 

648 

5 

•96  Subsoil 

I  318 

26.360 

.043 

860 

.0677 

1.354 

6 

•55  Subsoil 

1  376 

27,520 

.046 

920 

.1072 

2,144 

7 

70  Subsoil 

1  389 

27.780 

.017 

340 

.0755 

1.510 

8 

89  Surface 

1  396 

27,920 

.018 

360 

.0239 

478 

9 

•110  Surface 

1  397 

27,940 

.029 

580 

.0694 

1.388 

10 

77  Subsoil 

1  404 

28.080 

.027 

540 

.0674 

1.318 

11 

•104  Virgin 
•61  Surface 

1  472 

29.440 

.034 

680 

.0485 

970 

12 

1  576 

31.520 

.029 

580 

.0398 

796 

13 

57  Subsoil 

1  646 

32.920 

.014 

280 

.0516 

1.032 

14 

•11  Surface 

1  711 

34.330 

.059 

1.180 

.0526 

1.052 

15 

67  Surface 

1  744 

34,880 

.041 

820 

.0644 

1.288 

16 

48  Surface 

1.814 

36.280 

.066 

1,320 

.0768 

1.536 

17 

•47  Surface 

1  844 

36.880 

.063 

1,260 

.0256 

512 

18 

•50  Virgin 

1  902 

38,040 

.053 

1.060 

.0310 

620 

19 

•102  Surface 

1  992 

39.840 

.050 

1.000 

.0465 

930 

20 

•86  Surface 

1.997 

39.940 

.050 

1.000 

.0613 

1,226 

•Acid. 

12.2%  of  Surface  Soils  in  thb*  organic  group. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


205 


TABLE  III. 
The  N.  P.  and  Organic  Matter,  from  2  to  3%  Orgamc  Matter. 


Sample 
No. 

%0.  M. 

Pounds  per 
Acre. 

%N. 

Pounds  per 
Acre. 

%P. 

Pounds  per 
Acre. 

1 

•60  Subsoil 

2  023 

40.460 

.018 

960 

.0745 

1,490 

2 

•97  Surface 

2  063 

41,260 

.069 

1,380 

.0559 

1.118 

3 

•64  Subsoil 

2  065 

42.300 

.021 

420 

.1543 

3,086 

4 

•76  Surface 

2.073 

41,460 

.a56 

1.120 

.1180 

2.360 

5 

•1  Surface 

2  114 

42,280 

.063 

1,260 

.0273 

546 

6 

•115  Surface 

2.197 

43.940 

.083 

1.660 

.0182 

364 

7 

•63  Surface 

2  198 

43.960 

.053 

1,060 

.0411 

822 

8 

•107  Surface 

2  245 

44.900 

.067 

1,340 

.0816 

1,632 

9 

tl3  Virgin 

2  307 

46.140 

.063 

1,260 

0654 

1.308 

10 

•21  Subaoil 

2  394 

47,880 

.032 

640 

.0762 

1,524 

11 

t29  Subeoil 

2  403 

8,060 

.022 

440 

.0162 

324 

12 

•56  Surface 

2.422 

48,440 

.077 

1,540 

.0634 

1.268 

13 

•31  Surfaoe 

2  442 

48.840 

.032 

1.240 

.0580 

1,160 

14 

•75  Surface 

2  475 

49.500 

.038 

760 

.1031 

2.062 

15 

•99  Virgin 

2  526 

.50,520 

.070 

1,400 

.ia3i 

2.062 

16 

•90  Subsoil 

2  564 

51.280 

.055 

1,100 

.0738 

1,476 

17 

•  Surface 

2  567 

51.340 

.070 

1,400 

.0849 

1,698 

18 

•32  Surface 

2.579 

51,580 

.0ft4 

1,280 

.0479 

958 

19 

51  Surface 

2  585 

51.700 

.076 

1.520 

.0499 

998 

20 

•4  Surface 

2  620 

52,400 

.081 

1,620 

.0580 

1,160 

21 

19  Subsoil 

2  679 

63,580 

.036 

720 

.0394 

788 

22 

65  Virgin 

2  722 

54.440 

.059 

1,180 

.0600 

1,200 

23 

t58  Virgin 
•105  Surface 

2  798 

55,960 

.039 

780 

.0620 

1,240 

24 

2  841 

56.820 

.011 

220 

.0229 

458 

25 

•111  Virgin 
95  Surface 

2886 

57.720 

.076 

1.520 

.1092 

2.184 

26 

2.935 

58,700 

.125 

2.500 

.0644 

1,288 

27 

•6  Virgin 

2  994 

59,880 

.076 

1,520 

.0519 

1.038 

•Acid.    tVery  acid. 

23.3%  of  Surface  Soils  in  this  organic  group. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


206 


TABLE  IV. 
The  N.  P.  and  Organic  Matter,  from  3  to  4%  Organic  Matter. 


Sample 
No. 

%0.M. 

Pounds  j>er 
Acre. 

%N. 

Pounds  per 
Acre. 

%P. 

Pounds  per 
Acre. 

1 

*09SuHaGe 

3.000 

60,000 

.085 

1,700 

.W)76 

1.152 

2 

34  Virgin 

3.006 

60,120 

.085 

1.700 

.0843 

1.686 

3 

118  Subsoil 

3.101 

62.020 

080 

1.600 

.0708 

1,416 

4 

•43  Surface 

3.131 

62.620 

.083 

1.660 

0718 

1.436 

5 

0  Subeoil 

3.164 

62.280 

.032 

640 

.0414 

828 

6 

•28  Surface 

3.170 

63,400 

.070 

1,400 

.0634 

1.268 

7 

52  SubaoU 

3.176 

63.520 

.028 

560 

.0209 

418 

8 

37  Surface 

3.202 

64,040 

.090 

1,800 

.0516 

1.032 

9 

122  Surface 

3.228 

65,160 

.118 

2,360 

.0738 

1.476 

10 

•62  Surface 

3  258 

65.360 

.102 

2.040 

.0839 

1,678 

11 

•10  Virgin 

3  291 

65.820 

.074 

1.480 

.0401 

802 

12 

02  Subeoil 

3.338 

66,760 

.062 

1.240 

.0445 

890 

13 

•42  Surface 

3  405 

68,100 

.111 

2.220 

.0704 

1.408 

11 

123  SubsoU 

3.433 

68,660 

.078 

1,560 

1,246 

15 

74  Surface 

3.489 

69.780 

.105 

2.100 

.0462 

924 

16 

•8  Surface 

3  589 

71,790 

.101 

2.020 

.0516 

1,032 

17 

•14  SuHacc 

3.837 

76,740 

.111 

2,220 

.0630 

1,260 

18 

•7Suriace 

3.861 

77,220 

.106 

2.120 

.0741 

1.482 

10 

•38  Surface 

3.905 

78,100 

.104 

2,080 

.0775 

1.550 

20 

46  Subsoil 

3.912 

78.240 

.062 

1.240 

.1132 

2.264 

21 

•15  Suriace 

3  913 

78,260 

.143 

2.860 

0593 

1,186 

•Acid. 

16.6%  of  Surface  Soils  in  this  organic  group. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


207 


TABLE  V. 
The  N.  P.  and  Oncanic  Matter,  from  4  to  6%  Organic  Matter. 


Sample 
No. 

%O.M 

Pounds  per 
Acre. 

%N. 

Pounds  per 
Acre. 

%P. 

Pounds  per 
Acre. 

, 

80  Virxin 

4.010 

80,200 

.109 

2,180 

.0812 

1,624 

2 

t20  Surface 

4.057 

81,140 

.113 

2,260 

.0593 

1,186 

3 

•17  Vinrin 

4  119 

82.380 

.118 

2.360 

.0937 

1,874 

4 

128  Virfin 
*«6  Surface 

4233 

84,660 

.099 

1.980 

.1014 

2.028 

5 

4.299 

85.980 

.146 

2.920 

.1078 

2.156 

6 

109  Surface 

4473 

89.460 

.133 

2.660 

.0317 

634 

7 

•83  Surface 

4.547 

90,940 

.120 

2.400 

.0600 

1.200 

8 

91  Surface 

4833 

96.660 

.140 

2.800 

0846 

1.693 

9 

126  Surface 

4.892 

97,840 

.112 

2.240 

.1001 

2.002 

10 

•85  Surface 

4.901 

98,020 

.164 

3,280 

.1099 

2.198 

11 

100  Surface 

5.110 

102.600 

.157 

3.140 

0620 

1.240 

12 

27SubeoU 

5.334 

106.680 

.0084 

168 

.0101 

202 

13 

•69  Surface 

5  335 

106.700 

.176 

3.520 

.0752 

1.504 

14 

•93  Virgin 

6  451 

100,020 

.175 

3,500 

.0866 

1,732 

15 

127  Subeoil 

5  504 

110.080 

.077 

1,540 

2123 

4.246 

16 

78  Surface 

5  579 

111,580 

.090 

1,800 

.0647 

1.294 

17 

119  Virgin 

5  703 

114.060 

.220 

4,400 

.1479 

2,968 

18 

125  Subsoil 

5  833 

116.660 

.108 

2.160 

.0696 

1.392 

19 

•30  Virgin 

5.996 

119.920 

.169 

3.380 

.0910 

1,820 

•Acid,     fVery  acid. 

17.7%  of  Surface  Soils  in  this  orc^anic  group. 


»\ATL    V 

;■•  :. 

V 

• 

"■yW     \ 

1    *    "                                         '    ' 

*^^  •            .        « 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


208 


TABLE  \a. 
The  N.  P.  and  Organic  Matter,  from  6  to  10%  Oreanic  Matter. 


Sample 
No 

%O.M 

Pounds  per 
Acre. 

%N. 

Pounds  per 
Acre. 

%P. 

Pounds  per 
Acre 

1 

117  Surface 

6.278 

125.560 

.195 

3,900 

.0667 

1.334 

2 

113  Subsoil 

6.462 

129,240 

.192 

3.840 

.0654 

1.308 

3 

73  Virgin 

6  737 

134,740 

.190 

3.800 

.1382 

2.764 

4 

72  Subeoil 

7  215 

144,300 

.167 

3.340 

.0317 

634 

5 

114  Virgin 
108  Surface 

7.437 

148.740 

.258 

5,160 

.1533 

3.066 

6 

7  603 

152,060 

.020 

400 

.1412 

2,824 

7 

112  Surface 

8  645 

172,900 

.307 

6.140 

.  1587 

3.174 

8 

18  Surface 

8  695 

173,900 

.245 

4,900 

0108 

216 

9 

94  Surface 

9  312 

186.240 

.076 

1.520 

0559 

1.118 

10 

23  Subsoil 

9  377 

187.540 

.227 

4,540 

.1031 

2,062 

11 

26  Surfane 

9  634 

192.680 

.274 

5.480 

.1122 

2,244 

12 

45  Surface 

9.836 

196,720 

.295 

5.900 

.1692 

3.3S4 

10%  of  Surface  Soils  in  this  organic  group. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


209 


TABLE  VIT. 
Tho  N.  P.  and  Organic  Matter,  from  10  to  40%  Organic  Matter. 


Sample 

%O.M. 

Pounds  per 

%N. 

Pounds  per 

%P. 

Pounds  per 

No. 

Acre. 

Acre. 

Acre. 

1 

25  Surface 

11.205 

224,100 

.409 

8,180 

1361 

2,722 

2 

24  Virgin 
121  SurTace 

11.891 

237.820 

.403 

8.060 

.1227 

2.454 

3 

12.009 

240.190 

.399 

7,980 

.0344 

688 

4 

82  Surface 

12.025 

240.500 

.000 

0,000 

.1301 

3,602 

5 

•71  Surface 

13.146 

262,920 

.391 

7.820 

.0839 

1.678 

6 

22  Surface 

13  228 

264.560 

.428 

8.560 

.0816 

1.632 

< 

84  Surface 

16.318 

326,360 

.610 

12.200 

.1752 

3.504 

8 

81  Surface 

20.026 

400.520 

.626 

12,520 

.2763 

5,526 

9 

39  Surface 

28.239 

564,780 

.994 

19,880 

.1995 

3,990 

10 

101  Surface 

33  230 

664,600 

1.205 

24.100 

.3936 

7,872 

•Acid. 

11. 1%  of  Surface  Soils  in  thin  organic  group. 


4  ;^^ 


i- 


.  1. 


:  i 


pLATt  a 

1 

jft. 

•  --r---^^^^^"- 

14—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


210 


TABLE  VIII. 
The  N.  P.  and  Organic  Matter,  from  40  to  85%  Organic  Matt«r. 


Sample 

%0.  M. 

PoundBper 

%N. 

Pounds  per 

%P 

Pounds  per 

No. 

Acre. 

Acre. 

Acre. 

I 

*120  Surface 

41.666 

416,660 

1  491 

14.910 

.0903 

903 

2 

41  Vincin 

51.778 

617.780 

1.529 

15.290 

.2258 

2,258 

3 

•36  Subsoil 

56.469 

564,690 

1.876 

18.760 

.2642 

2,642 

4 

t44  Surface 

64.652 

646.520 

2.138 

21,380 

.2116 

2.116 

5 

124  Surface 

66.196 

661.960 

2.124 

21.240 

.2035 

2.035 

6 

t35  Surface 

68.514 

685,140 

2.254 

22.540 

.3060 

3.060 

7 

106  Surface 

72.343 

723,430 

2.656 

26.560 

.3923 

3.923 

8 

53  Surface 

76.913 

769.130 

3.27o 

32.760 

.3572 

3.572 

9 

54  Subsoil 

80.661 

806.610 

3.157 

31.570 

.3478 

3.478 

10 

40  Subsoil 

81.260 

812.600 

1.928 

19.280 

.3977 

3.977 

U 

88  Surface 

84.698 

846.980 

2.496 

24,960 

.2912 

2.912 

•Acid.     tVery  acid.     *1, 000, 000  pounds  per  acre  6  2-3  in. = weight  of  muck  sail. 
8.8%  of  the  Surface  Soils  in  this  organic  ^oup. 

Summary. 

Analysis  shows  that  a  large  per  cent  of  the  soils  of  Fulton  County 
are  deficient  in  organic  matter.  About  half  of  them  are  below  4  per 
cent. 

The  soils  are  not  very  acid  to  litmus.  Only  six  samples  were  found 
to  be  unusually  acid  while  fifty-two  others  were  slightly  acid  to  the 
same  indicator.  Most  of  the  acid  samples  were  among  the  soils  con- 
taining a  low  amount  of  organic  matter. 

A  considerable  number  of  the  soils  contained  less  than  1,500  pounds 
of  phosphorus  and  nitrogen  per  acre  (6  2/3  in.).  These  amounts  are 
deficient  and  such  soils  would  undoubtedly  respond  profitably  if  fer- 
tilized with  these  elements. 

The  tables  show  a  considerable  decrease  in  content  of  plant  food  in 
cultivated  soil  compared  with  corresponding  virgin  soils. 

The  accompanying  graphs  indicate  that  there  is  a  close  relation- 
ship between  the  yield  of  corn  and  the  nitrogen  and  phosphorus  content 
of  the  soil.  As  the  nitrogen  and  phosphorus  content  increases,  the 
yield  increases. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


211 
Sulphur  By-Products  of  the  Preparation  op  Ether. 


p.  N.  Evans  and  G.  K.  Foresman — Purdue  University. 


The  formation  of  ethyl  ether  from  alcohol  and  sulphuric  acid  was 
first  explained  by  Williamson  in  1852.  According  to  his  theory  the 
first  reaction  is  the  formation  of  ethyl  sulphuric  acid  and  water,  accord- 
ing to  the  equation, 

CjH.OH  +  H^Oi  =  C3H6HSO4  -h  H,0. 

The  ethyl  sulphuric  acid  then  reacts  with  more  alcohol  to  form 
ether  and  sulphuric  acid, 

CjHsHSO,  -1^  CaH.OH  =  C.H50C,H5  +  H^SO*. 

If  these  changes  were  the  only  ones  taking  place  a  limited  quantity 
of  sulphuric  acid  might  convert  an  unlimited  quantity  of  alcohol  into 
ether  and  water. 

Experience  has  shown,  however,  that  there  is  a  limit  to  the  quantity 
of  alcohol  that  can  be  converted  into  ether  by  a  given  weight  of  sul- 
phuric acid,  and  two  explanations  have  been  offered  for  the  limitation. 

Many  writers  accept  the  theory  that  the  water  produced  in  the  first 
reaction  so  dilutes  the  sulphuric  acid  that  the  change  can  not  continue. 
It  has  been  shown,  however,  by  Evans  and  Sutton,  that  the  water  does 
not  accumulate  enough  to  prevent  the  reaction  but  distills  over  with 
the  ether,  normal  results  having  been  obtained  when  starting  with  very 
dilute  sulphuric  acid,  the  acid  becoming  concentrated  enough  for  its 
normal  effect  by  the  time  the  proper  temperature  (140°)  is  reached. 

Others,  including  the  present  writers,  accept  the  explanation  that 
the  sulphuric  acid  employed  is  gradually  converted  into  other  sulphur 
compounds,  either  carried  out  of  the  generator  with  the  ether  and 
water,  or,  if  remaining,  incapable  of  inducing  the  formation  of  ether. 
The  purpose  of  the  work  here  reported  was  to  determine  the  quantities 
of  these  sulphur  by-products  formed  during  the  heating. 

Numerous  by-products  have  been  reported  by  previous  workers, 
including  the  following:  Sulphur  dioxide,  sulphurous  acid,  ethyl  sul- 
phurous acid;  sulphuric  anhydride,  ethyl  sulphuric  acid,  ethyl  sulphate; 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


212 

ethyl  sulphonic  acid,  isethionic  acid,  ethionic  acid,  butyl  sulphonic  acid 
and  the  ethyl  esters  of  these  acids. 

Experimental. 
Outline. 
The  experimental  work  consisted  of  the  preparation  of  ether  in 
the  usual  way  from  ordinary  alcohol  and  strong  sulphuric  acid,  main- 
taining as  nearly  as  practicable  a  constant  temperature  of  140°,  as 
long  as  ether  resulted  from  introducing  fresh  alcohol.  The  distillate 
and  residue  were  then  examined  quantitatively  for  by-products  con- 
taining sulphur,  which  were  determined  as  of  three  classes:  sulphurous 
acid  and  sulphites,  sulphuric  acid  and  sulphates,  and  sulphonic  acids 
and  sulphonates;  no  distinction  was  made  between  the  different  pos- 
sible substances  within  any  class,  as  between  the  acid  and  its  esters, 
except  in  the  case  of  sulphuric  acid  and  its  esters. 

Sulphuric  Acid  Used. 

Twenty-five  cubic  centimeters  of  commercial  concentrated  acid  were 
used,  so-called  66°  Baume  or  1.84  sp.  gravity.  Unfortunately  an  ac- 
curate determination  of  its  concentration  was  not  made,  but  assuming 
that  the  material  used  was  in  accordance  with  its  specification  it  con- 
tained about  95  per  cent  HaSO*,  and  the  weight  of  pure  acid  used  was 
43.7  grams.  This  figure  agrees  fairly  well  with  the  total  sulphur  found 
in  the  products,  which  was  equivalent  to  45.25  grams  of  sulphuric  acid. 
The  work  is  being  repeated  with  accurate  observations. 

In  the  percentages  g:iven  below  reference  is  made  to  the  total  sul- 
phur found  by  direct  analysis  of  the  products,  and  not  this  43.7  grams 
of  sulphuric  acid. 

Ether  Preparation. 

The  apparatus  included  a  250  cc.  distilling  flask  provided  with  a 
thermometer  dipping  into  the  liquid,  and  a  dropping  funnel  delivering 
alcohol  just  above  the  surface  and  bent  away  from  the  thermometer; 
the  flask  was  attached  to  a  condenser,  connected  with  a  2\^  liter  receiv- 
ing bottle,  followed  by  two  wash-bottles  containing  bromine  water,  the 
entrance  tube  of  each  reaching  to  the  bottom,  to  catch  any  possible 
sulphur  dioxide  escaping  from  the  receiving  bottle.  Each  bottle  was 
provided  with  a  safety  tube  reaching  nearly  to  the  bottom,  which  in 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


213 

the  case  of  the  wash-bottles  served  also  for  the  introduction  of  bromine 
as  needed. 

In  the  flask  were  placed  25  cc.  concentrated  sulphuric  acid  and 
25  cc.  ordinary  strong  alcohol,  so-called  95  per  cent;  the  mixture  was 
heated  to  140°  and  the  temperature  maintained  as  nearly  constant  as 
possible,  alcohol  being  run  in  continuously  from  the  funnel.  The  dis- 
tillation lasted  a  total  of  33^  hours  exclusive  of  interruptions.  Air 
was  then  aspirated  through  the  whole  apparatus  to  sweep  out  remaining 
vapors;  a  small  quantity  of  black  residue  was  left  in  the  flask. 

Examination  of  the  Distillate. 

The  distillate  measured  4,100  cc.  from  4,700  cc.  of  alcohol  used; 
it  was  acid  to  litmus  and  its  gravity  was  0.880  at  18°. 

The  apparent  loss  is  due  largely  to  the  formation  of  ethylene,  evi- 
dence of  which  was  shown  by  a  layer  of  ethylene  bromide  in  the  wash 
bottles. 

One  liter  of  the  distillate  was  saponified  with  an  excess  of  sodium 
hydroxide,  to  convert  all  esters  into  the  corresponding  sodium  salts, 
and  distilled  down  to  50  cc,  the  distillate  being  again  distilled  down  to 
about  5  cc.  and  the  residues  were  mixed.    It  was  alkaline. 

Sulphur  as  Sulphur  Dioxide  and  Sulphites. 

The  alkaline  residue  was  diluted  and  an  aliquot  part  was  acidified 
with  hydrochloric  acid  and  distilled  into  bromine  water  to  convert  the 
sulphur  dioxide  evolved  into  sulphuric  acid,  which  was  determined  as 
barium  sulphate;  the  sulphur  found  amounted  to  1.03  per  cent  of  that 
employed  as  sulphuric  acid.  The  contents  of  the  two  wash-bottles  con- 
taining bromine  water  were  freed  from  bromine  and  precipitated  with 
barium  chloride  and  0.96  per  cent  of  the  original  sulphur  found.  Dur- 
ing the  preparation  of  ether,  therefore,  1.99  per  cent,  of  the  sulphur 
of  the  acid  used  was  lost  from  the  generating  flask  in  the  form  of  sul- 
phur dioxide  and  sulphites. 

Sulphur  as  Sulphuric  Acid  and  Sulphates. 

An  aliquot  part  of  the  alkaline  residue  from  the  saponification  was 
analyzed  for  sulphates  by  precipitation  as  barium  sulphate.  The  sul- 
phur found  amounted  to  89.42  per  cent  of  the  total  found. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


214 

In  order  to  distinguish  between  sulphuric  acid,  ethyl  sulphuric  acid 
and  ethyl  sulphate  in  the  ether  distillate,  the  residue  on  evaporation 
of  an  aliquot  part  was  dissolved  in  water  and  precipitated  with  barium 
chloride;  the  barium  sulphate  corresponded  to  46.54  per  cent  of  the 
total  sulphur  as  sulphuric  acid.  The  total  acidity  of  another  aliquot 
part  of  the  residue  of  the  ether  distillate  was  determined  by  titration 
with  standard  alkali;  the  free  sulphuric  acid  already  found  as  described 
was  subtracted,  and  the  remaining  acidity  considered  as  due  to  ethyl  sul- 
phuric acid,  the  sulphur  in  this  form  amounting  to  8.49  per  cent  of 
the  total  sulphur.  The  total  sulphur  in  the  ether  distillate  (89.42)  less 
the  sulphur  as  sulphuric  acid  (46.54)  and  that  as  ethyl  sulphuric  acid 
(8.49)  would  represent  the  sulphur  as  ethyl  sulphate,  namely,  34.39 
per  cent  of  the  total  sulphur. 

As  several  months  elapsed  between  the  preparation  of  the  ether 
and  this  examination  of  the  product  it  is  probable  that  there  had  been 
considerable  change  from  ethyl  sulphate  into  ethyl  sulphuric  acid  and 
sulphuric  acid,  on  account  of  the  hydrolytic  action  of  the  water  present. 
At  the  temperature  of  140°,  however,  sulphuric  acid  (boiling  point  of 
the  dihydrate  is  given  as  170-199°)  might  distill  as  readily  as  ethyl 
sulphate  (boiling  point  208°);  nothing  seems  to  be  known  as  to  the 
possibility  of  ethyl  sulphuric  acid  distilling  as  such. 

Sulphur  as  Sulphonic  Acids  and  Sulpkonates. 

The  filtrate  from  the  barium  sulphate  precipitate  obtained  in  the 
determination  of  sulphur  as  sulphuric  acid  and  sulphates  was  evap- 
orated to  dryness  and  the  residue  subjected  to  a  Carius  determination 
for  sulphur;  4.62  per  cent  of  the  total  sulphur  was  found. 

Examination  op  the  Residue. 

Suljihur  as  Sulphur  Dioxide, 

The  residue,  weighing  3  grams,  stood  several  months  in  the  closed 
distilling  flask.  Air  was  aspirated  through  the  flask  and  then  through 
bromine  water,  and  0.15  per  cent  of  the  total  sulphur  was  found  in  the 
bromine  water. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


215 

Sulphur  as  Sulphuric  Acid. 

The  residue  was  extracted  with  water  and  an  aliquot  part  of  the 
filtrate  was  treated  with  barium  chloride;  1.69  per  cent  of  the  total  sul- 
phur was  found. 

Sulphur  as  Sulphates, 

An  aliquot  part  of  the  filtrate  from  the  black  residue  was  saponi- 
fied with  sodium  hydroxide  and  total  sulphuric  acid  determined  as 
barium  sulphate.  Deducting  the  sulphuric  acid  found  without  saponifi- 
cation treatment,  0.99  per  cent  of  the  original  sulphur  was  found  as 
sulphates,  presumably  ethyl  sulphuric  acid  and  ethyl  sulphate. 

Sulphur  as  Sulphonic  Adds  and  Sulphonates. 
The  filtrate  from  the  barium  sulphate  obtained  in  the  determina- 
tion of  sulphur  as  sulphates  was  evaporated  to  dryness  with  potassium 
nitrate  and  barium  hydroxide,  and  the  residue  after  ignition,  was 
treated  with  dilute  nitric  acid,  filtered  and  weighed  as  barium  sulphate, 
showing  1.02  per  cent  of  the  original  sulphur. 

Sulphur  in  the  Insoluble  Carbonaceous  Residue. 
The  extracted  black  residue  was  fused  with  potassium  nitrate  and 
barium  hydroxide  and  the  resulting  barium  sulphate  was  weighed.     It 
corresponded  to  0.12  per  cent  of  the  original  sulphur. 

Conclusions. 
From  the  following  results  it  appears  that  the  formation  of  ether 

ceases  because  of  the  disappearance  of  the  sulphuric  acid   from  the 

generating  flask. 

Sulphur  was  found  in  the  following  forms  and  proportions,  referred 

to  their  total  as  100  per  cent. 

Sulphur  dioxide  escaping  from  the  receiver  during  dis- 
tillation         0.96  per  cent. 

Sulphur  dioxide  and  sulphites  in  ether  distillate 1.03 

Sulphuric  acid  and  sulphates  in  ether  distillate 89.42 

Sulphuric  acid  in  ether  distillate 46.54 

Ethyl  sulphuric  acid  in  distillate 8.49 

Ethyl  sulphate  in  ether  distillate 34.39 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


216  j 

Sulphonic  acids  and  sulphonates  in  distillate 4.62  ' 

Sulphur  dioxide  in  residue 0. 15  ' 

Sulphuric  acid  in  residue 1 .  69  I 

Ethyl  sulphuric  acid  and  ethyl  sulphate  in  residue 0.99  i 

Sulphonic  acids  and  sulphonates  in  residue 1 .  02 

Sulphur  in  insoluble  carbonaceous  residue 0.12 

Total    100.00 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


217 

The  Effect  of  Tobacco  Smoke  and  of  Methyl  Iodide  Vapor 
ON  THE  Growth  of  Certain  Micro-Organisms. 

(Abstract.    Published  in  full  in  Am.  Jour.  Bot.  5:  1918.) 


C.  A.  LuDWiG — Lawrence  University,  Appleton,  Wis. 


The  work  here  abstracted  was  carried  out  under  the  direction  of 
Prof.  F.  C.  Newcombe  at  the  University  of  Michigan  and  was  supple- 
mentary to  a  similar  investigation  in  which  illuminating*  gas  and  its 
constituents  were  employed. 

The  organisms  used  in  the  case  of  tobacco  smoke  included  14  species 
of  bacteria  and  2  of  fungi,  and  in  that  of  methyl  iodide  vapor  13  species 
of  bacteria  and  2  of  fungi.  The  cultures  were  on  glucose  nutrient  agar 
slants.  The  culture  chambers  were  tubulated  glass  bell  jars  set  in 
crystallizing  dishes  and  sealed  with  paraffin. 

The  methyl  iodide  was  introduced  into  the  chamber  on  a  pledget  of 
cotton  attached  to  the  end  of  a  glass  rod  fastened  in  a  stopper.  The 
stopper,  in  turn,  was  used  to  close  the  tubulature  in  the  bell  jar. 

When  smoke  was  used  it  was  introduced  by  means  of  a  tube  through 
a  two-hole  stopper  in  the  tubulature.  The  suction  was  provided  by  an 
aspirator  connected  with  the  interior  of  the  bell  jar  by  a  tube  through 
the  second  hole  in  the  stopper.  The  tobacco  was  burned  in  a  cob  pipe. 
In  some  tests  the  smoke  was  used  without  being  treated  in  any  way; 
in  others  it  was  passed  through  one  or  two  wash  bottles  of  water. 

The  results  indicated  that  tobacco  smoke  is  toxic  to  the  organisms 
tested  but  not  so  extremely  toxic  as  to  some  phanerogams.  In  view 
of  the  large  number  of  compounds  in  smoke  it  is  hardly  worth  while  to 
venture  an  opinion  as  to  what  substances  caused  the  results  observed. 
The  wash  smoke,  however,  showed  less  toxicity  than  the  unwashed 
smoke.  This  would  suggest  that  something  capable  either  of  being 
condensed  or  of  being  dissolved  in  water  has  some  part  in  causing  the 
results. 

The  effect  of  methyl  iodide  vapor  was  to  kill  the  cultures  where 
the  concentration  was  great  enough.  Where  the  concentration  was 
less  it  resulted  in  an  initial  great  retardation  in  the  development  of  the 
streaks  followed  later  by  a  very  vigorous  growth. 


^The   influence   of   illuminatinfir   gas   and   its   constituents   on    certain   bacteria   and 
fungi.    Am.  Jour.  Bot.  5:  1918. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


219 
Brief  Notes  on  the  New  Castle  Tornado. 


C.  C.  Beals — Indiana  University. 


A  number  of  destructive  tornadoes  occurred  in  Indiana  during 
1917.  The  first  one  of  these  passed  over  a  part  of  New  Castle.  Mr. 
Melvin  Kelleher  and  the  writer  mapped  the  tract  of  the  storm  under 
the  direction  of  the  Geology  Department  of  Indiana  University. 

The  New  Castle  tornado  formed  about  3:00  o'clock  in  the  afternoon 
on  March  11,  1917.  At  the  point  of  origin  objects  were  displaced  by 
two  currents  of  air.  One  from  the  southwest  and  the  other  from  the 
northwest,  meeting  in  Sec.  11,  Tp.  17  N,  R.  9  E.  The  wind  from  the 
southwest  seemed  to  be  a  straight  wind  but  the  one  from  the  north- 
west evidently  had  a  spiral  motion,  judging  from  the  direction  the 
fences,  trees  and  other  objects  fell.  The  first  evidences  of  wind  dis- 
turbance occurred  about  one  mile  southwest  of  Cadiz.  The  storm 
traveled  almost  due  east  exijept  for  a  few  short  curves.  It  struck  New 
Castle  about  the  center  on  the  west  side,  after  crossing  a  broad  glacial 
valley,  and  emerged  near  the  southeast  comer  of  the  town.  The  tor- 
nado continued  in  a  general  eastward  direction,  going  south  of  Hagers- 
town,  and  ceased  inflicting  damage  about  four  miles  southeast  of  that 
place. 

The  storm  evidently  continued  eastward  high  in  the  air,  going  about 
eight  miles  north  of  Richmond  into  Ohio.  Fragments  of  articles  were 
found  in  Ohio. 

One  interesting  feature  noted  was  in  a  large  wood  about  sixty  rods 
from  north  to  south  which  lay  in  the  path  of  the  wind  where  the  storm 
first  formed.  Trees  were  uprooted  and  broken  off,  all  falling  toward 
the  general  direction  of  the  wind  except  two  trees  at  either  end,  which 
were  crossed.  The  main  destruction  was  caused  by  the  portion  of  the 
storm  south  of  the  storm  center  and  the  crossing  was  produced  by  the 
opposite  current  in  the  whirl. 

The  track  of  4he  storm  could  be  easily  traced  except  at  two  points, 
where  there  was  no  disturbance  for  over  one-half  mile  in  each  case. 

The  storm  first  appeared  like  a  huge  mass  of  black  coal  smoke 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


220 

rolling,  tumbling  forward,  which  later  formed  a  black  cloud  with   a 
funnel-shaped  tail.    The  noise  made  by  it  was  described  as  being  like  a 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


221 


OUNT  Carmel  Fault. 


icted 
:t  of 

the 
»ther 
ime- 
tiga- 
'  the 

the 
itone 
»uth- 
L»aw- 
half 

and 
ches 

The 
inty, 
Mit- 

beds 
hich 
ex- 
,  the 
tone, 
•urg, 
;hese 
is  a 
nob- 

y  be 
rigin 
riow. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


222 

The  most  palpable  objection  to  this  view  is  the  fact  that  no  noncon- 
formity exists  between  the  Knobstone  and  the  Harrodsburg  limestone 
at  their  contact  a  few  miles  west  of  the  strip.  Another  objection  is 
that  the  bottom  of  the  channel,  at  present  at  least,  is  not  all  of  uniform 
elevation  throughout  its  length.  The  principal  objections  to  the  view 
of  a  double  fault  are  two — at  no  point  was  a  direct  vertical  contact 
of  Knobstone  and  limestone  visible,  nor  was  there  to  be  seen  any  of 
the  tilting,  crushing  and  shattering  which  usually  accompanies  faulting. 
On  the  other  hand,  as  the  vicinity  of  the  contact  line  is  approached 
the  shaly  layers  of  the  limestone  become  more  and  more  argillaceous 
and  apparently  pass  over  into  the  Knobstone.  To  determine  the  exact 
conditions  under  which  the  limestone  strip  was  laid  down  would  re- 
quire more  extended  study  than  is  consistent  with  the  scope  of  this 
report.  What  has  been  done  was  to  trace  upon  the  accompanying  maps 
the  outcrop  of  the  Bedford  oolitic  and  to  examine  the  bed  more  care- 
fully at  places  where  it  is  now  being  quarried,  namely  at  Heltonville 
and  Fort  Ritner." 

In  the  proceedings  of  the  Academy  of  Science  of  Indiana  for  1897, 
page  262,  J.  A.  Price  discusses  the  boundary  of  the  limestone  strip  and 
says  in  conclusion:  ''It  is  not  possible,  from  data  in  hand,  to  say 
surely  whether  this  strip  of  limestone  owes  its  existence  to  an  uncon- 
formity or  a  fault." 

In  1903  J.  F.  Newsom  published  a  description  of  a  "Geologic  Section 
Across  Southern  Indiana"  as  a  part  of  the  26th  Annual  Report  of  the 
State  Geologist.  On  pages  274  and  275  Newsom  refers  to  the  structure 
as  a  fault  in  the  Knobstone  area.  He  gives  its  extent  as  being  from 
near  Unionville  in  Monroe  County  to  a  point  in  .the  northern  part  of 
Washing:ton  County. 

In  referring  to  the  discussions  of  Siebenthal  and  Price  in  the 
27th  Annual  Report  of  the  State  Geologist,  1903,  on  page  90,  Ashley 
says:  "It  is  evident  that  if  the  limestone  strip  north  of  White  River 
is  due  to  a  fault  its  effects  should  continue  to  the  south  rather  than 
turn  and  follow  the  outcrop.  A  glance  at  the  map  in  the  region  north 
of  Campbellsburg  is  alone  sufficient  proof  of  the  fault  character  of  the 
disturbance." 

In  studying  this  structure  in  detail  the  writer  has  found  that  it  is 
much  more  extensive  than  Newsom  stated;  that  there  is  a  second  fault; 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


223 

that  other  disturbances  were  connected  with  it  and  that  the  actual 
contact  which  he  has  found  presents  some  interesting  features. 

Extent  of  the  Fault. — While  I  have  not  yet  been  able  to  trace  the 
fault  to  the  borders  of  the  State  at  either  of  its  extremities  I  have  been 
able  to  trace  it  far  beyond  its  mentioned  boundaries  and  feel  confident 
that  the  particular  disturbance  under  discussion  extended  from  the 
Ohio  to  the  Wabash  along  the  western  border  of  the  Knobstone  outcrop 
and  perhaps  beyond.  Tracing  the  fault  south  of  Campbellsburg  in 
Washington  County  is  difficult  because  the  area  on  each  side  of  the 
rift  is  occupied  by  limestone. 

Along  the  northern  end  of  the  displacement  glacial  deposits  conceal 
the  bedrock  to  such  an  extent  as  to  render  observation  difficult.  Undei 
these  circumstances  the  best  that  can  be  done  is  to  trace  the  disturbance 
by  the  reversal  of  dip  of  the  limestones,  as  the  finding  of  the  rift  will 
be  extremely  difficult.  By  such  observations  as  it  was  possible  to  make 
I  have  traced  the  disturbance  from  a  point  southeast  of  Campbellsburg 
in  Washington  County  to  a  point  northwest  of  Waveland  in  Montgomery 
County. 

Rift. — The  actual  contact  of  the  rocks  along  the  fault  plane  is 
revealed  in  only  a  few  places.  There  are  numerous  places  where  the 
harder,  more  resistant  stratum  of  limestone  stands  forth  like  a  wall  on 
one  side  of  the  rift,  but  the  opposite  side  is  occupied  by  mantle  rock 
which  was  derived  by  the  weathering  of  the  Knobstone  and  which  con- 
ceals the  actual  rift.  Excavations  made  at  such  places  would  doubtless 
reveal  the  actual  contact  of  the  limestone  and  the  Knobstone. 

In  a  few  localities  the  rift  is  exposed  and  the  plane  of  the  fault 
is  bordered  on  the  one  side  with  limestone  and  on  the  other  by  shale. 
One  outcrop  of  the  rift  zone  was  found  in  the  bed  of  the  north  fork  of 
Leatherwood  Creek  near  Heltonville.  At  this  point  the  Knobstone 
occurs  on  one  side  of  the  fault  plane  and  the  Harrodsburg  limestone  on 
the  other.  The  line  of  rift  is  distinct,  being  marked  by  a  thin  bed  of 
breccia.  The  brecciated  zone  is  composed  mainly  of  fragments  of  lime- 
.  stone  in  which  small  fragments  of  shale  are  intermingled.  These  frag- 
ments have  been  cemented  together  with  calcite  and  the  whole  zone  more 
or  less  marbleized.  In  a  cross-section  of  the  brecciated  rock  the  veins 
of  calcite  stand  out  clearly,  as  they  are  whiter  than  the  fragments  of 
limestone   and   shale   which   they   bind   together.     Small   quantities    of 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


224 

other  minerals  are  present  in  some  parts  of  the  brecciated  zone,  but 
there  is  an  absence  of  the  more  insoluble  minerals,  such  as  silica  or  the 
silicates.  This  fact  leads  to  the  conclusion  that  meteoric  rather  than 
thermal  waters  have  played  the  leading  role  in  the  concentration  of 
these  minerals. 

Periods  of  Movement, — The  question  of  whether  the  displacement 
took  place  all  at  one  time  or  was  intermittent  is  an  interesting  one.  All 
of  my  attempts  to  find  an  evidence  of  intermittent  movement  by  an  ex- 
amination of  surface  features  have  been  unsuccessful.  If  there  were 
intermittent  movements  of  any  considerable  extent  we  would  probably 
find  them  revealed  in  hanging  valleys  on  the  upthrow  side  and  the  rapid 
broadening  of  valleys  on  the  downthrow  side  of  the  fault.  In  case  there 
were  two  stages  of  movement,  and  the  movement  in  the  last  stage  an 
exceedingly  slow  one,  the  vertical  cutting  of  the  main  stream  might 
be  as  rapid  as  the  uplift,  but  still  the  rejuvenation  of  the  tributaries 
should  result  in  a  narrowing  of  the  valleys.  In  the  rift  zone  there  is 
evidence  of  two  stages  of  movement  though  the  amount  of  displacement 
in  the  second  stage  is  slight.  The  time  interval  between  the  two  move- 
ments was  of  considerable  leng:th,  since  the  fragments  of  the  brecciated 
zone  were  firmly  cemented  before  the  second  movement  took  place. 
Fragments  of  shale  which  were  included  in  the  limestone  fragments 
during  the  first  movement  were  faulted  by  the  second  movement.  These 
shale  inclusions  would  not  have  undergone  faulting  had  they  not  been 
held  rigidly  in  place  by  the  cementing  material. 

Amount  of  Throw. — The  amount  of  throw  of  the  fault  varies  prob- 
ably from  200  to  300  feet.  Opportunities  for  measuring  the  amount  of 
throw  are  not  numerous.  It  can  best  be  computed  by  estimating  the 
total  amount  of  eastward  dip  of  the  formations  along  the  line  of  con- 
tact between  the  Harrodsburg  and  the  Knobstone.  At  a  point  south 
of  Mt.  Carmel  the  difference  in  elevation  of  the  contact  above  sea  level 
is  50  feet  in  a  distance  of  one-fourth  mile.  Since  the  width  of  the 
down-thrown  block  is  at  least  one  mile  and  a  half  in  this  locality  the 
throw  of  the  fault  is  at  least  300  feet.  The  aniount  of  dip  of  the  down-* 
thrown  beds  in  other  localities  is  less  than  at  this  point,  so  much  less 
that  the  indicated  throw  is  not  more  than  200  feet. 

Age  of  the  Fault, — The  time  at  which  the  dislocation  occurred  can 
not  be  fixed  definitely.    It  is  probable  that  it  occurred  at  the  close  of  the 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


225 

Paleozoic  Era  when  the  Appalachian  revolution  which  resulted  in  the 
elevation  of  the  eastern  part  of  North  America  took  place.  Contem- 
poraneous with  or  subsequent  to  that  great  epeirogenic  movement,  fault- 
ing and  minor  folding  took  place  in  Indiana,  Illinois  and  Iowa,  and 
other  States  lying  as  far  west  as  these  from  the  region  of  maximum 
disturbance.  These  faults  like  the  one  under  discussion  have  a  north- 
west trend. 

The  Heltonville  Fault. — About  one  mile  west  of  the  Mt.  Carmel  fault 
there  is  a  second  fault.  This  I  have  named  the  Heltonville  fault  be- 
cause the  rift  is  exposed  a  short  distance  east  of  Heltonville  in  the  bed 
of  the  north  fork  of  Leatherwood  Creek,  at  a  point  just  east  of  the 
wagon  crossing  under  the  Southern  Indiana  railroad.  This  fault  lies  ap- 
proximately parallel  with  the  Mt.  Carmel  fault.  The  limestone  has  been 
faulted  down  against  the  Knobstone.  Slickenslides  have  been  produced  in 
the  limestone  and  it  has  been  much  fractured.  In  places  the  limestone 
has  been  thrust  backward  and  fragments  of  the  Knobstone  shales  have 
been  thrust  into  the  limestone.  In  places  these  formations  are  dove- 
tailed, fingers  of  limestone  projecting  into  the  Knobstone  and  vice  versa 
as  first  one  and  then  the  other  yielded  to  the  pressure.  The  fragments 
of  limestone  containing  inclusions  of  shale  have  been  united  by  calcite 
veins. 

Though  the  fault  character  of  the  disturbance  at  this  point  is  in- 
contestable it  is  not  equally  clear  at  other  points.  The  disturbance  ex- 
tends both  north  and  south  of  this  point,  but  it  probably  passes  into  a 
fold  in  both  directions.  In  Monroe  County  near  Unionville  there  is  an 
anticline  whiqh  occupies  about  the  same  position  in  relation  to  the  Mt. 
Carmel  fault  as  the  Heltonville  fault  does.  Similar  folds  have  been 
noted  at  intervening  points  and  also  to  the  south  of  Heltonville. 

Effect  Upon  Topography, — The  general  effect  upon  topogrraphic 
conditions  within  the  area  of  disturbance  has  been  to  produce  a  nar- 
row limestone  belt  extending  parallel  with  the  main  Knobstone  outcrop 
and  bordered  on  each  side  by  outcrops  of  Knobstone.  In  the  southern 
portion  of  the  faulted  area  the  western  belt  of  Knobstone  is  absent,  but 
its  nearness  to  the  surface  along  the  line  of  the  eastward  reversal  of 
dip  is  revealed  in  the  channels  of  many  streams  which  have  carved 
their  valleys  at  right  angles  to  the  line  of  reversal.  Probably  the  most 
marked   effect   is   on   the   drainage.      Both   surface    and   underground 

15—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


226 

drainage  lines  are  affected.  In  the  faulted  area  the  ground  waters 
which  have  found  their  way  through  the  limestone  have  a  tendency  to 
follow  the  eastward  sloping  surface  of  the  Knobstone  to  the  rift,  and 
near  this  point  often  come  to  the  surface  in  a  stream  valley  which  lies 
near  the  rift  and  generally  parallel  with  it.  This  tendency  of  the 
underground  streams  is  modified  by  local  dips  of  the  strata  north  or 
south. 

The  surface  streams,  especially  those  along  the  line  of  the  fault 
plane,  have  been  influenced  by  the  displacement.  They  have  worked  off 
the  harder  limestones  on  to  the  Knobstone  in  many  places.  These  fol- 
low the  line  of  rift  until  a  local  north  or  south  dip  has  caused  them  to 
change  the  direction  of  their  course.  Small  tributaries  of  the  larger 
cross-cutting  streams  have  developed,  as  has  been  noted  again  and 
again,  along  the  line  of  rift. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


227 


Utilization  of  Indiana  Kaolin. 

WiLUAM  N.  Logan — Indiana  University. 


Extensive  beds  of  kaolin  exist  in  Lawrence  and  Martin  counties  in 
the  horizon  of  the  Huron  formation.  The  kaolin  has  been  mined  and 
utilized  to  a  limited  extent  only.  Its  abundance  and  quality  justifies  a 
more  extended  use.  Attempts  have  been  made  to  use  it  as  a  substitute 
for  southern  kaolin  used  in  Indiana  in  the  manufacture  of  encaustic 
tile.  The  lack  of  bonding  power  is  evident  from  the  cracks  and  crazes 
which  occur  in  the  burned  ware.  The  writer  undertook  to  find  a  clay 
which  might  be  mixed  with  the  kaolin  for  the  purpose  of  supplying 
bonding  power  and  tensile  strength.  Mixtures  of  pottery  clays  and 
Indiana  fire  clays  were  made  and  the  objects  burned.  It  was  found 
that  tile  could  be  manufactured  successfully  out  of  the  kaolin  when 
from  25  to  40  per  cent  of  fire  clay  was  added. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


229 


Certain  Indicia  of  Dip  in  Rocks. 


William  N.  Logan — Indiana  University. 


The  object  of  this  paper  is  to  bring  together  certain  indications  of 
dip  and  the  direction  of  dip  in  rocks  which  the  writer  has  observed  in 
his  field  work.  Ali  of  these  indicia  have  been  noted  doubtless  by  other 
observers  of  geological  conditions.  However,  they  are  brought  to- 
gether here  in  the  hope  that  the  collection  may  be  of  assistance  to 
students  of  structural  problems  in  geology. 


.^ 

^<^'''T*T" 

-  -  -  -    — 

1     1           i<#^.>^                 1 

•:••  Ml:  ••:-.V..V|.--.--. •.••.=••  :|;:- 

■^:-:-\^;ji>^r^ 

si^'l'". '•' 

.•:V|::;.V:|V::;xv|:;::.:o|.V.;| 

1      •         1               1      '       1           >S7^             1             1            1           1               1 

'              '             . 

.       1      "     ^*«^?>**^ 

II                      1 

.     1      '.1               1..-. 

|.;.:.'v.-*M7r 

\x:y\: 

lv;-:7;l;^/:;d:;:;--l/////f:; 

.-L.-J-,_J 

1 

r^ 

i.-LJ„i-U.L 

Fi?.   1.     Cross-section  of  strata,   showing  dipping  beds  with  a  grulch  approximately 
at  right  angles  to  the  dip.     Right  surface  of  rocks  in  gulch  damp,  left  surface,  dry. 

Wet  or  Damp  Surfaces, — In  the  case  of  an  outcrop  extending  ap- 
proximately at  right  angles  to  the  dip  of  the  beds  the  exposed  surface 
of  the  rocks  on  the  lower  side  of  the  dipping  beds  may  be  bathed  in 
moisture.  The  presence  of  the  moisture  is  due  to  the  seepage  of  water 
from  the  porous  layers  in  the  rocks.  Such  seepage  can  take  place  only 
under  certain  conditions  of  humidity  and  would  not  be  noticeable  in  an 
arid  region.  If  the  outcrop  is  in  a  railroad  cut  or  in  a  stream  with 
precipitous  banks  the  outcrop  on  the  opposite  side  from  the  clamp  sur- 
face will  be  dry  because  the  water  is  conducted  away  from  its  surface, 
instead  of  toward  it.  The  conditions  are  illustrated  in  the  following 
diagram  in  which  the  shaded  side  of  the  cut  on  the  down-dip  side  is 
kept  moist  by  water  flowing  along  the  bedding  planes  and  through 
porous  layers,  while  the  surface  of  the  rocks  on  the  opposite  side  of  the 
cut  is  dry  because  the  water  is  conducted  away  from  the  exposure.     If 


Digit! 


zed  by  Google 


230 

the  dip  were,  say,  a  southwest  dip,  then  the  south warG  direction  of  the 
dip  would  be  revealed  by  wet  surfaces  on  the  north  side  of  outcrops, 
while  the  westward  dip  would  be  revealed  by  moisture  on  the  east  side 
of  exposures. 

Springs. — Such  conditions  as  have  been  outlined  above  often  result 
in  the  formation  of  springes.     Sometimes  a  chain  of  springs  is  formed 


Fif?.  2.  The  case  of  a  stream  cutting  ihroueh  strata  approxunately  at  risrht  angrles 
to  the  dippiner  beds.  Springs  will  be  formed  at  the  contact  of  porous  and  impervious 
layers  on  the  left  bank  of  the  stream. 


Fig.  3.  Showing  cross-section  of  a  partly  disectcd  anticline.  Sprinfts  may  be  formed 
in  the  valleys  on  each  side  of  the  axis  at  the  points  of  contact  of  pervious  and  imper- 
vious layers. 

along  an  exposure  on  its  down-dip  side.  The  essential  conditions  for  a 
spring,  such  as  a  porous  layer  overlying  an  impervious  one,  must  be 
present.  Springs  are  of  especial  value  as  indicia  in  cases  of  concealed 
outcrop.  Even  if  the  bed-rock  be  concealed  by  mantle  rock,  springs  often 
break  forth  at  the  point  of  contact  of  the  pervious  and  impervious  beds 
and  by  observing  the  position  of  these  along  the  valley  walls  of  cross- 
cutting  streams,,  as  in  the  case  of  wet  surfaces,  the  direction  of  dip 
may  be  determined. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


231 

Springs  are  also  good  indicia  of  reversal  of  dip.  Take  for  example 
the  occurrence  of  a  porous  bed  overlying  an  impervious  bed  in  an  anti- 
cline. Springs  will  be  formed  one  each  side  of  the  anticline  at  the 
point  of  contact  of  the  porous  bed  with  the  impervious  one.  If  the 
anticline  is  a  symmetrical  one  a  chain  of  springs  may  occur  at  about 
the  same  elevation  on  each  side  of  the  fold.  If  the  anticline  is  unsym- 
metrical  the  springs  may  occur  at  a  higher  elevation  on  one  side  than  on 
the  other. 

Springs  may  also  indicate  the  reversal  of  dip  produced  by  the  down- 
throw of  a  block  along  a  normal  fault.  The  springs  will  occur  on  the 
banks  of  depressions  following  the  general  direction  of  the  strike  and 
on  the  down-dip  side  of  the  outcrop. 


Fig.  4.     Shows  i)ool  of  water  formed  on  surface  of  dippinK  bed.     Note  position  of 
water  level  with  reference  to  position  of  bedding  planes  on  each  side  of  pool. 

Surface  of  Pools. — The  surface  of  pools  of  water  in  inclined  strata 
furnishes  a  horizontal  plane  by  means  of  which  even  slight  degrees  of 
dip  may  be  recognized.  The  conditions  most  favorable  to  such  observa- 
tions are  the  presence  of  inclined  beds  of  hard  rock  or  alternate  layers 
of  hard  and  soft  rock  which  have  been  crossed  by  a  stream  in  the  bed 
of  which  pools  have  been  formed.  Using  the  surface  of  the  water  in 
the  pool  as  a  level,  even  slight  dips  may  be  detected  by  the  difference 
in  the  elevation  of  the  surface  of  the  water  upon  layers  on  opposite  sides 
of  the  pool.  If  the  water  stands  on  the  uneroded  surface  of  a  hard 
layer  it  will  have  greater  depth  on  the  down-dip  side  of  the  pool. 

Stream  Channels, — The  channels  of  dry  streams  are  useful  in  de- 
termining the  direction  of  dip.  In  the  case  of  a  stream  trending  in  a 
line  which  is,  in  general,  parallel  with  the  strike  and  cutting  across 
hard  layers  or  beds  composed  of  alternate  hard  and  soft  layers  the 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


232 

stream  will  be  thrown  toward  the  down-dip  side.  The  channel  of  the 
stream  will  have  a  more  gentle  slope  on  the  up-dip  side  and  a  more  abrupt 
slope  toward  the  down-dip  side.  The  stream,  tending  to  follow  the  sur- 
face of  the  hard  layer  in  the  bottom  of  the  channel,  cuts  against  the 
bank  on  the  lower  side  of  the  inclined  bed  making  that  bank  more 
abrupt  by  under  cutting.  At  the  same  time  the  more  shallow  deposi- 
tional  area  of  the  stream  is  on  the  opposite  side  and  its  slope  is  ren- 
dered more  gentle. 

Overhanging  Ledges, — Outcrops  of  rock  in  inclined  strata  which 
contain  layers  of  sufficient  induration  to  project  unsupported  form  on 
the  upper  side  of  the  inclined  beds  overhanging  ledges.  These  ledges 
occur  in  layers  of  hard  rock  but  are  more  pronounced  in  outcrops  con- 
taining alternate  layers  of  hard  and  soft  rock.     Slight  degrees  of  dip 


Fif?.  5.    Notch  cut  by  stream  in  dippins:  strata.     Note  erentle  slope  on  left  and  abrupt 
slope  on  rigrht. 

may  be  noted  by  observing  the  plane  of  shadows  under  these  overhang- 
ing rocks.  Frequently  the  direction  of  dip  may  be  determined  by  the 
movement  of  water  on  the  underside  of  these  ledges. 

Caves, — In  limestone  regions  the  position  of  caves  serves  as  an 
indication  of  the  direction  of  dip.  Wherever  a  stream  cuts  through  a 
thick  bed  of  inclined  limestone  the  valley  wall  opposite  the  down-dip 
side  of  the  stream  will  have  a  series  of  caves  which  mark  the  positions 
of  tributaries  or  of  former  tributaries  of  the  stream.  The  opposite  side 
of  the  valley  will  contain  no  caves  in  its  wall.  If  these  caves  occur  on 
the  west  side  of  a  valley  trending  north  and  south  the  direction  of  the 
dip  of  the  beds  is  eastward. 

In  the  case  of  a  stream  heading  in  an  inclined  bed  of  limestone  it 
frequently  happens  that  more  than  one  cave  is  formed.  Frequently 
one  at  each  terminal  of  the  small  tributaries.  If  these  tributaries  be 
close  together  and  approximately  parallel  one  will  necessarily  be  farther 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


233 

down  on  the  inclined  slope  of  the  beds  than  the  other.  Now  since  these 
tributaries  are  supplied  with  water  draining  down  the  surface  of  the 
impervious  layer  beneath  the  limestone  the  tributary  farthest  down 
on  the  slope  will  receive  the  greater  amount  of  water.  Thus  it  often 
happens  that  there  is  a  lower  cave  from  which  a  stream  of  water  is 
issuing  and  an  upper  cave  that  contains  little  or  no  running  water. 
In  regions  of  such  occurrences  the  cave  on  the  lower  part  of  the  slope 
is  referred  to  as  the  "wet  cave"  and  the  upper  one  as  the  "dry  cave." 
The  direction  of  dip  is  readily  determined  by  the  relative  positions  of 
these  caves. 


FiiT.  6.     Shows  valley  trending  at  ritirht  angles  to  the  dip  of  inclined  strata. 
and  overhansdng:  ledges  on  left. 


Cave 


Sink  Holes, — On  moderately  to  steeply  inclined  limestone  surfaces 
the  shape  of  the  sink  holes  may  be  an  indication  of  the  direction  of  dip. 
As  a  rule  the  longer  axis  of  the  sink  hole  will  lie  parallel  to  the  direc- 
tion of  dip.  Erosion  produced  by  water  flowing  into  the  sink  will  be 
greater  on  the  side  opposite  the  direction  of  dip.  The  slope  on  this  side 
of  the  sink  becomes  longer  and  more  gentle.  Very  frequently  there 
will  be  one  or  more  short  surface  streams  entering  the  sink  from  the 
side  of  this  gentler  slope. 

Length  of  Tributaries, — In  the  case  of  a  stream  cutting  in  a  direc- 
tion approximately  at  right  angles  to  the  direction  of  dip  the  tribu- 
taries which  follow  down  the  dip  will  be  longer  than  those  which  flow 
up  the  dip.  This  would  not  be  true  in  a  rock  of  uniform  hardness 
devoid  of  stratification.  Such  indications  are  more  noticeable  in  beds 
containing  hard  and  soft  layers  of  rock. 

Indurated  Surfaces, — The  surfaces  of  some  porous  beds  of  rock 
which  are  exposed  on  the  sides  of  cuts  opposite  the  direction  of  dip 
become  indurated  by  the  more  or  less  constant  evaporation  of  water 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


234 


containing  minerals  in  solution.  These  minerals  left  behind  fill  the 
pores  of  the  rock  and  unite  the  individual  grains  of  the  rock,  thus  hard- 
ening the  surface.  The  rocks  on  the  opposite  side  of  the  cut  may  lack 
this  degree  of  induration  because,  since  the  dip  is  away  from  the  out- 
crop, the  greater  part  of  the  water  is  drained  away  from  the  surface 
and  the  amount  evaporated  at  this  point  is  small. 


Fig.  7.     Croes-section  and  horizontal  section  of  strata  containinR  sink  holes.     Note 
lonffer  axis  of  holes  parallel  to  the  direction  of  dip. 

• 

Deposition  of  SedimenL — On  the  surfaces  of  layers  of  hard  rock 
which  are  inclined  either  in  quarries  or  stream  beds  the  deposition  of 
sediment  may  indicate  the  direction  of  dip.  The  thicker  accumulation 
of  sediment  will  occur  in  the  direction  of  the  dip.  In  the  case  of  quarry 
floors  which  are  formed  on  the  stratification  planes  the  distribution  of 
rock  dust  and  other  forms  of  debris  by  running  water  will  reveal  the 
direction  of  the  dip. 

Distribution  of  Vegetation. — In  inclined  beds  which  outcrop,  vegeta- 
tion is  sometimes  more  abundant  on  the  side  of  the  outcrop  opposite 
the  direction  of  dip.  This  greater  abundance  when  it  does  occur  is  due 
to  the  increased  amount  of  moisture  and  its  almost  constant  supply  to 
the  surface  of  the  outcrop  through  the  porous  layers  whi(:h  are  draining 
down  the  dip. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


235 


Brief  Notes  on  Field  Methods  Used  in  Geological  Work 
OF  Mid-Continent  Oil  Fields. 


Louis  Roark — Indiana  University. 


In  writing  this  article  the  writer  is  not  attempting  to  make  an 
elaborate  discussion  of  the  various  methods  nor  is  he  attempting  to 
suggest  new  methods  of  doing  field  work,  but  instead  is  endeavoring  to 
bring  together  in  a  compact  form,  various  methods  commonly  used,  for 
the  benefit  of  the  young  geologist  who  has  not  had  an  opportunity  to 
learn  them  by  actual  experience. 

No  doubt  many  will  take  issue  with  me  in  regard  to  the  value  of 
some  of  these  methods.  However  the  writer  has  found  them  quite  satis- 
factory under  certain  conditions  and  within  certain  limitations. 

The  geological  work  as  conducted  by  the  different  oil  companies 
of  the  mid-continent  field  is  based  upon  one  fundamental  principle, 
namely,  the  location  of  structure  favorable  to  the  production  of  oil. 
The  favorable  structure  as  all  know  is  the  anticline.  Therefore  the 
geologist  is  continually  searching  for  the  anticline. 

The  geologist  meets  with  many  and  varied  difficulties  in  this  work. 
He  must  follow  the  outcrops  of  the  various  rock  strata  and  obtain  eleva- 
tions at  intervals  of  at  least  one  quarter  mile  and  oftener  if  necessary. 
He  must  also  measure  the  vertical  interval  between  the  different  strata 
whenever  the  two  horizons  outcrop  close  together,  thus  presenting  an 
opportunity  to  make  such  measurement.  This  vertical  interval  should 
be  measured  frequently  in  order  to  catch  any  variation  in  the  interval. 
These  elevations  and  intervals  are  used  as  a  basis  for  drawing  the 
structural  contours,  thus  enabling  the  geologist  to  select  the  most  fa- 
vorable locations  for  drilling. 

The  following  methods  are  used  to  obtain  the  elevation  of  outcrops. 

1.  Plane  Table  and  Stadia  Traverse,  Using  Telescopic  Alidade. 

2.  Setting  Bench  Marks  with  Plane  Table  and  Stadia.  Geologist 
Using  Aneroid  Barometer. 

3.  Using  Aneroid  Barometer  with  Stationary  Barograph. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


236 

4.  Setting  Bench  Marks  with  Aneroid  Barometer. 

5.  Reconnaissance  (Scouting)  Using  Aneroid  Barometer  and  Hand 
Level. 

Method  No  1. 

For  close  detail  work  the  plane  table  and  stadia  traverse  is  by  far 
the  most  accurate  method  and  no  doubt  favored  by  all  geologists. 

With  this  method  the  party  consists  of  a  geologist  in  charge  and 
an  instrument  man.  The  geologist  carries  the  stadia  and  follows  the 
outcrop,  giving  stadia  readings  for  location  and  elevation  as  fre- 
quently as  he  deems  necessary.  Between  stations  the  instrument  man 
sketches  the  drainage,  roads  and  any  and  other  features  necessary  to 
make  a  complete  geological  map. 

At  intervals  of  an  hour  or  an  hour  and  a  half  the  geologist  should 
return  to  the  plane  table  and  sketch  the  various  outcrops  on  the  map 
and  record  the  vertical  interval  between  the  different  strata  he  has 
mapped. 

At  night  the  day's  work  is  inked  in  and  that  portion  of  the  map 
is  complete  with  exception  of  the  structural  contours. 

This  method  is  favored  for  open  country  and  areas  free  from  tim- 
ber growth,  and  is  fairly  rapid. 

The  small  telescopic  alidade  used  by  the  United  States  Geological 
Survey  is  commonly  used.  The  size  of  plane  table  depends  upon  hori- 
zontal scale  used,  varying  from  15  inches  to  24  inches  square. 

Method  No.  2. 

The  second  method  used  is  not  as  accurate  as  first  but  is  much 
more  rapid  for  use  in  timber-covered  areas. 

With  this  method  an  instrument  man  with  plane  table,  stadia  and 
a  rodman  are  sent  into  the  particular  area  to  be  mapped.  They  run 
a  stadia  traverse  along  the  roads,  establishing  bench  marks  at  the 
corners  and  other  conspicuous  places,  at  least  every  one-half  mile.  It 
the  roads  are  few  the  bench  marks  should  be  established  at  the  end  of 
spurs  that  extend  toward  the  main  stream  between  tributary  valleys.  A 
key  system  being  used  to  mark  the  bench  marks,  the  rodman  paints 
the  bench  marks  according  to  the  key  used.  The  elevation  and  number 
or  key  is  recorded  on  the  map  for  use  of  the  geologist. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


237 

The  geologist  now  takes  the  level  sheet  from  the  instrument  man 
and  by  use  of  the  aneroid  barometer  carries  the  elevation  along  the 
outcrop  of  rock  strata.  For  the  results  obtained  with  the  barometer 
to  be  of  any  value  care  should  be  taken  that  the  barometer  is  checked 
frequently. 

The  method  ordinarily  used  is  to  set  the  aneroid  barometer  at  same 
elevation  as  bench  mark  from  which  start  is  made  also  noting  time 
barometer  was  set,  which  is  essential.  Whenever  an  elevation  reading 
is  made  on  the  outcrop  the  time  of  reading  should  be  noted.  The 
barometer  must  be  checked  at  a  known  elevation  every  forty  or  forty- 
five  minutes  and  should  not  be  more  than  an  hour  between  checks  for 
accurate  results.  The  barometer  must  not  be  changed  after  being  set 
at  first  station  in  the  morning. 

At  night,  plot  a  curve  showing  amount  of  variation  of  barometer 
from  normal  during  day.  By  means  of  the  curve  correct  all  readings 
for  elevations  made  during  the  day  by  adding  or  subtracting  the  differ- 
ence from  normal,  to  the  reading  to  be  corrected. 

Example:  Suppose  correction  curve  shows  aneroid  barometer  was 
reading  22  feet  high  at  10:15  and  elevation  reading  on  outcrop  was 
953  feet  at  same  time.  To  get  correct  elevation  of  that  point  subtract 
22  feet  from  953  feet  which  gives  931  feet,  the  correct  elevation.  If 
aneroid  barometer  was  reading  low  at  10:15  the  22  feet  should  be  added 
to  give  correct  elevation  which  would  be  975  feet,  etc. 

While  geologist  is  walking  the  outcrop,  he  should  sketch  the  drain- 
age, roads,  trend  of  outcrop  of  rock  strata  and  other  features  necessary 
to  make  a  complete  geological  map. 

After  making  correction  of  barometer  readings  the  day's  work 
should  be  inked  as  finished,  so  that  the  work  will  not  be  lost  by  erasure 
during  work  the  next  day.  The  inking  should  be  up  to  date  at  all 
times. 

The  aneroid  barometer  most  commonly  used  is  2%  inches  in  diam- 
eter graduated  to  record  elevation  of  3,000  feet  with  10  feet  divisions. 
Frequently  larger  instruments  are  used,  some  as  much  as  6  inches  in 
diameter.     The  larger  aneroids  are  the  more  accurate. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


238 


Method  No.  3. 


The  third  method  is  not  as  accurate  as  either  of  the  first  two,  but 
much  more  rapid,  and  can  be  carried  on  with  less  expense,  as  the  plane 
table  and  operator  are  eliminated.  With  care  accurate  results  can  be 
accomplished  with  this  method. 

If  a  geologist  is  sent  into  a  field  to  do  a  rapid  piece  of  work  and 
time  available  for  doing  the  work  or  character  of  the  work  would  not 
pay  to  employ  the  use  of  plane  table  and  stadia  this  method  is  the 
most  satisfactory  one  to  use.  The  reader  must  keep  in  mind  that  the 
element  of  time  is  important  to  the  oil  geologist.  He  must  finish  his 
work  and  get  report  to  the  chief  geologist  to  pass  upon,  before  another 
company  has  an  opportunity  to  obtain  lease  on  valuable  acreage  that 
he  is  likely  to  report  favorable. 

In  this  method  a  barograph  can  be  used  to  an  advantage  in  con- 
nection with  the  ordinary  aneroid  barometer.  Set  the  barograph  at 
some  place  near  center  of  area  to  be  worked  and  proceed  with  aneroid 
barometer  as  in  Method  No.  2,  noting  time  all  reading^s  are  made.  At 
night,  instead  of  plotting  curve  as  before,  use  curve  of  barograph  and 
proceed  in  same  way  to  make  correction  for  elevations. 

If  a  barograph  is  not  available  use  two  aneroid  barometers,  one 
to  be  stationary  and  the  other  carried  by  geologist.  In  case  two  aneroids 
are  used  the  one  stationary  should  be  read  every  15  or  20  minutes 
throughout  the  day  and  a  curve  plotted  from  these  readings.  Proceed 
as  before  in  making  corrections  for  elevations. 

Method  No.  4. 

The  fourth  method  can  be  used  in  case  it  is  desirable  to  detail  a 
small  area  and  neither  a  plane  table,  barograph  or  extra  aneroid 
barometer  is  available  and  time  is  short  for  completing  the  work. 

The  geologist  uses  his  aneroid  to  establish  his  own  bench  marks. 
An  elevation  at  a  certain  point  may  be  assumed.  Set  aneroid  at  this 
assumed  elevation,  noting  the  time.  Drive  in  a  circle  making  readings 
at  points  where  bench  marks  are  desired,  noting  time  of  readings.  Re- 
turn to  starting  point  within  45  minutes  or  an  hour  from  time  of  start 
Repeat  circuit,  checking  previous  readings.  Now  these  points  can  be 
used  as  bench  marks,  making  circuits  from  these  points  establishing 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


239 

bench  marks  farther  out,  checking  and  rechecking  the  points  to  be  used 
as  bench  marks.  Continue  this  until  bench  marks  have  been  established 
over  area  to  be  detailed.  Plot  curve  and  make  corrections  for  eleva- 
tions of  points  to  be  used  for  bench  marks.  After  the  bench  marks 
have  been  established  the  method  of  procedure  is  same  as  in  Method  No. 
2  in  all  respects. 

This  method  is  very  good  and  quite  accurate  for  obtaining  quick 
results. 

Method  No.  5. 

The  fifth  method  is  simply  reconnaissance  work,  or  scouting,  as 
it  is  frequently  called. 

With  this  method  the  geologist  drives  over  the  country  observing 
the  dip  of  the  rock  strata  by  use  of  the  hand  level,  aneroid  barometer 
or  eye. 

Wherever  an  exposure  of  rock  is  observed  the  hand  level  is  used  to 
determine  the  approximate  amount  of  dip  in  any  distance.  The  direc- 
tion of  dip  may  be  obtained  by  use  of  the  compass.  The  geologist  must 
always  know  the  height  of  his  eye  from  the  ground. 

Example:  Suppose  strata  is  dipping  west  and  in  a  distance  of 
one-quarter  mile  the  geologist  finds  the  dip  to  be  five  times  the  height 
of  his  eye  which  is  5  feet  6  inches,  therefore  the  rock  would  be  dipping 
27  feet  6  inches  in  one  quarter  mile,  etc. 

The  aneroid  barometer  may  be  used  in  scouting  to  determine  ap- 
proximate amount  of  dip  for  short  distances.  Read  elevation  of  outcrop, 
then  follow  strata  for  distance  exposed,  with  occasional  readings,  noting 
amount  of  variation  from  first  reading.    This  gives  the  amount  of  dip. 

Example:  If  aneroid  reads  700  feet  at  a  given  point  and  outcrop 
is  followed  east  one-quarter  mile  and  then  reads  670  feet,  showing 
strata  dips  east  30  feet  in  one  quarter  mile.  Supposing  second  reading 
was  732  feet  then  strata  dips  west  32  feet  in  one  quarter  mile,  etc. 

An  experienced  geologist  should  be  assigned  to  scouting  work.  The 
greatest  value  of  this  method  is  that  it  permits  a  large  territory  to  be 
covered  rapidly  and  a  g^reat  part  eliminated.  An  experienced  man  will 
be  able  to  find  most  of  the  structure.  Later,  if  deemed  advisable,  the 
various  structures  reported  by  the  scout  can  be  worked  in  detail  by 
either  of  the  first  two  methods. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


241 


An  Improved  Form  of  Mercury  Vapor  Air  Pump. 


Chas.  T.  KNIPP—University  of  Illinois. 


(Abstract.) 

The  mercury  vapor  pump  described  in  this  paper  retains  the  same 
simple  valve  arrangement  described  recently  by  the  writer,*  but  on  the 
other  hand  replaces  the  umbrella  that  deflected  the  mercury  vapor 
downward  through  an  annular  throat  by  the  commonly  used  aspirator 
nozzle  through  which  the  vapor  issues  vertically  upwards.  This  neces- 
sitates an  interchange  of  connections  leading  to  the  supporting  pump 
and  the  vessel  to  be  exhausted. 

This  pump,  single  stage,  will  operate  on  any  oil  supporting  pump 
of  the  grade  of  the  Nelson  pump.  In  addition  to  its  speed,  its  simplicity 
of  design  and  ease  of  construction  are  important  points,  and  when  con- 
structed of  pyrex  glass  is  durable. 

The  paper  also  gives  the  data  obtained  when  several  of  these  pumps 
are  placed  in  tandem.  Again,  a  three-stage  pump  retaining  the  same 
general  principle  is  described,  designed  to  operate  on  a  poorly  working 
water  aspirator  as  a  supporting  pump.  The  mercury  vapor  for  each 
stage  is  supplied  from  the  same  boiler,  yet  at  different  pressures,  tlie 
highest  pressure  to  the  first  stage  exhausting  into  the  aspirator.  Sam- 
ple pumps  and  sketches  were  exhibited. 


*  Phys.  Rev..  N.  S.  IX,  No.  3.  March,  1917. 


le— 11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


243 
A  Possible  Standard  of  Sound. 


Chas.  T.  Knipp — University  of  Illinois. 


(Abstract.) 

The  paper  as  presented  described  a  source  of  sound  recently  brought 
to  the  writer's  attention,  while  blowing  a  mercury  vapor  trap  of  pyrex 
glass,  that  bids  fair  to  furnish  a  standard  of  sound  of  any  desired  pitch 
with  no  other  apparatus  than  the  trap  and  a  bunsen  burner.  In  its  sim- 
plest form  the  apparatus  is  an  ordinary  trap  as  shown  in  Fig.  1,  having 
the  usual  ring  seal  at  M. 

To  operate,  close  A  with  a  sliding  piston  of  cork,  let  C  remain  open, 
and  apply  a  bunsen  burner  (adjusted  to  give  a  fairly  hot  flame)  at  B. 
The  tube  AB  should  be  held  in  the  flame  at  an  angle  so  that  the  central 
portion  M  is  not  unduly  heated.  When  B  begins  to  glow,  a  pure  tone 
that  is  readily  audible  over  a  large  room  is  emitted  at  C.  The  pitch  of 
the  sound  is  dependent  upon  the  length  of  the  vibrating  column  AB  and 
also  upon  the  length  of  the  side  tube  MC.  Attaching  a  horn  at  C 
intensifies  the  sound  many  fold.  The  only  opening  is  at  C,  yet  a  candle 
placed  at  this  point  is  instantly  blown  out.  On  closer  examination  it 
was  noticed  that  a  current  of  air  enters  the  tube  C  around  its  edge, 
and  another  at  the  same  time  escapes  from  it  along  its  axis. 

There  are  other  conditions  that  affect  the  pitch.  Those  noted  thus 
far  are:  That  heating  the  region  about  M  destroys  the  sound;  but  on 
the  other  hand  if  the  flame  is  removed  from  B,  then  C  stopped  and  A 
opened,  the  tube  will  again  operate  on  heating  M  to  redness;  that  the 
pitch  is  raised  by  the  addition  of  extra  side  tubes  fused  to  the  vibrating 
column  at  M,  and  is  instantly  lowered  when  these  extra  branches  are 
in  turn  stopped. 

Tubes  having  different  dimensions  were  constructed.  These  can 
be  adjusted  over  wide  ranges — each  an  octave  or  more — and  all  give, 
apparently,  clear  tones  particularly  free  from  overtones.  By  supplying 
heat  to  the  end  B  at  a  constant  rate  (as  by  an  electric  furnace)  the 
pitch  may  be  kept  constant  for  an  indefinite  length  of  time.  The  ap- 
paratus should  therefore  furnish  a  standard  source  of  sound. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


2U 


E 
u 

O 


u 


B 


♦  8  mm 


I4mm 


M 


E 
E 


0> 


V    ?*."K».  ."  V    >''113''.A-* 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


245 
Energy  Losses  in  Commercial  Hammers. 


Edwin  Morrison  and  Robert  L.  Petry — Earlham  College. 

It  is  a  well-known  principle  of  mechanics  that,  in  case  a  moving 
object  impinges  against  another  object,  that  the  total  momentum  before 
impact  is  equal  to  the  total  momentum  after  impact.  In  other  words, 
"That  momentum  is  conserved  in  all  impacts,  be  it  between  elastic  or 
inelastic  objects."  This  law  does  not  permit  us  to  infer,  however,  that 
there  are  no  energy  losses  in  impacts.  In  fact  the  kinetic  energy  is 
always  less  after  impacts  than  before  impacts  of  two  impinging  objects. 
By  testing  this  out  by  ordinary  laboratory  methods  we  find  these  energy 
losses  to  vary  from  as  high  as  eighty  per  cent  in  case  of  inelastic  impacts 
to  as  low  as  two  per  cent  in  elastic  impacts. 

In  teaching  this  subject  I  have  for  a  number  of  years  attempted 
to  illustrate  and  fasten  these  principles  in  the  mind  of  the  student  by 
such  questions  as  the  following:  Suppose  a  carpenter  is  employing  a 
number  of  men  in  a  mechanical  process,  such  as  the  driving  of  nails 
with  a  hammer,  would  it  be  of  importance  for  him  to  look  into  the 
grade  of  hammers  used?  Or  again:  Suppose  a  railroad  company  is 
retracking  its  line  and  it  is  necessary  to  drive  thousands  of  spikes,  does 
it  matter  whether  the  sledge  hammers  used  are  made  of  cast  iron  or  a 
high  grade  of  steel? 

It  so  happened  that  my  present  class  inquired  as  to  whether  it 
would  be  possible  to  try  these  conditions  out  in  an  experimental  way. 
After  a  moment's  reflection  I  informed  them  that  it  would  be  a  very 
simple  matter  to  make  tests  by  substituting  a  hammer  for  one  of  the 
steel  spheres  in  our  impact  machine.  This  has  been  done  in  the  case 
of  four  hammers  with  considerable  care. 

The  apparatus  used  was  similar  to  that  employed  in  Experiment  6, 
page  62,  in  Millikan's  Mechanics,  Molecular  Physics,  and  Heat.  One  of 
the  steel  spheres  was  removed  and  the  hammer  to  be  tested  was  sub- 
stituted in  its  place  as  shown  in  Fig.  1.  In  order  to  support  the  dif- 
ferent hammers  as  nearly  as  possible  under  the  same  conditions,  a  frame 
was  suspended  by  four  adjustable  cords,  to  which  the  hammers  could  be 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


246 

rigidly  bolted.  The  experiment  consists  in  displacing  the  hammer  to  a 
certain  angular  position  to  one  side  the  normal  position  and  allowing  it 
to  drop  and  impinge  upon  the  steel  sphere,  noting  the  maximum  angular 
displacement  of  both  the  steel  sphere  mi  and  the  hammer  after  impact 


The  following  equations  are  applicable 
The  Coefficient  of  Restitution  =  ^  = 
The  percentage  loss  of  K.E.  =  1  =  (1  -  $») 


m 
mi  -  ni2 
and  w  are  measured  directly  upon  the  graduated  scale  ggi. 


^(l  —  cos  w)  —  J  (v.os  a  —  cos  p) 
4  (cos  a  —  cos  ff) 
'  (2)      The  values  of  a,  p,  «, 


TABLE  I. 


•si 
15 

1 

1 

i 

a 

1 

a 

1 

a 
d 

i 

e 

§1 

1 

1 

:?. 

^ 

s? 

H 

H 

^ 

u 

JJU» 

< 

No.  1 

2329 

6590 

123  3 

782.3 

297 

608 

10  0 

14.4 

.9539 

2.063 

No.  1 

232.9 

659  0 

123.3 

782.3 

2.97 

6.63 

11.0 

15.9 

.9405 

2.645 

2.354 

No.  2 

232  9 

518  8 

123.3 

634  1 

3.27 

5.82 

10  5 

13.8 

.8981 

5.193 

No.  2 

232.9 

518.8 

123  3 

634.1 

3.27 

6  29 

11  5 

15.2 

.8945 

5  364 

5.297 

No.  3 

232  9 

332  6 

1233 

455  9 

3.00 

4.70 

99 

11  8 

.8618 

8  693 

No.  3 

232  9 

332.6 

123.3 

455  9 

3  00 

5.71 

13.0 

15.5 

.8406 

9  921 

9.307 

No.  4 

232  9 

245  6 

123.3 

368.9 

3.02 

5.95 

15.0 

15.2 

.6829 

20.65 

No.  4 

232.9 

245.6 

123  3 

368.9 

3.02 

4.91 

12.0 

15.3 

.7265 

18  27 

19.46 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


247 

Hammer  No.  1  was  a  high-grade  machinist  hammer. 

Hammer  No.  2  was  a  claw  hammer  purchased  as  a  high-grade  tool. 

Hammer  No.  3  was  a  lower-grade  machinist  hammer. 

Hammer  No.  4  was  a  cast-iron  hammer  purchased  at  a  five  and  ten 
cent  store. 

The  steel  sphere  used  in  the  above  experiment,  when  tested  with  a 
similar  sphere,  gave  an  average  of  approximately  two  per  cent  energy 
loss. 

Conclusion:  The  experiment  justifies  the  conclusion  that  high-g^rade 
steel  hammers  conserve  to  a  much  larger  degree  the  kinetic  energy  of 
a  blow  than  low-grade  cast-iron  hammers. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


249 


The  Effect  of  Artificul  Selection  on  Bristle  Number 
IN  Drosophila  ampelophila. 


Fernandus  Payne — Indiana  University. 


The  following  brief  abstract  gives  a  summary  of  the  results  ob- 
tained in  an  experiment  designed  to  test  the  eifect  of  artificial  selection 
on  bristle  number  in  Drosophila  ampelophila,  and  to  find  out  in  what 
way  selection  is  active. 

The  normal  number  of  bristles  on  the  scutellum  is  four.  In  a  mass 
culture  which  had  been  bred  in  the  laboratory  about  three  months,  a 
female  was  found  with  one  extra  bristle,  or  five  in  all.  This  female 
was  mated  to  a  male  from  the  same  mass  culture.  Of  the  F  offspring, 
two  females  had  five  bristles.  These  two  females  were  mated  to  their 
normal  brothers,  and  gave  in  F%  935  normal  flies,  thirty-nine  with 
five  bristles,  and  four  with  six  bristles.  The  flies  with  extra  bristles 
were  again  mated  and  this  method  of  selecting  the  high-grade  par- 
ent has  been  continued  throughout  the  experiment.  The  per  cent  of 
extra  bristled  flies  and  the  mean  bristle  number  have  been  gradually 
increased  until  in  the  last  generations  of  selection  no  normal  flies  were 
found  and  the  mean  reached  9.089  in  the  twenty-eighth  generation. 
From  the  twenty-eighth  to  the  thirty-eighth  generations,  the  mean  re- 
mained practically  the  same.  A  back  selection  line  started  from  the 
eleventh  generation  was  without  effect. 

Selection  then  has  produced  decided  results.  The  larger  question 
is,  how  have  the  results  been  produced?  Have  they  been  produced  by 
selecting  somatic  variations,  by  selecting  the  variations  of  the  gene 
which  stands  for  bristle  number,  or  have  they  been  produced  by  piling 
up  or  getting  rid  of  modifying  factors?  The  first  possibility  can  be 
dismissed  without  much  consideration,  as  any  character  which  is  in- 
herited must  be  germinal.  Of  the  other  two  possibilities,  my  evidence 
is  in  favor  of  the  latter.  It  shows  quite  conclusively,  I  think,  that 
there  is  a  factor  in  the  X-chromosome  and  also  one  in  the  third  chromo- 
some which  modifies  bristle  number.  There  may  be  more  than  two 
such  factors.  One  was  no  doubt  present  at  the  beginning  of  the  experi- 
ment. The  others  probably  occurred  as  mutations  during  the  course 
of  selection. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


251 


The  UNiONiDiE  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee. 


By  Barton  Warren  Evermann, 

California  Academy  of  Sciences,  San  Francisco, 

and 

Howard  Walton  Clark, 

U.  S.  Biological  Station,  Fairport,  Iowa. 

During  the  physical  and  biological  survey  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee 
carried  on  by  the  writers  at  intervals  front  1899  to  1913,  under  the 
auspices  of  the  United  States  Bureau  of  Fisheries,  considerable  atten- 
tion was  devoted  to  the  freshwater  mussels  or  clams  (Unionidae)  in- 
habiting that  lake.  This  was  justified  by  the  rapid  and  astonishing 
development  of  the  pearl  button  industry  in  America,  which  is  dependent 
upon  the  shells  of  the  mussels  for  its  raw  material.  The  recent  develop- 
ment of  methods  whereby  several  species  of  Unionidae  are  now  success- 
fully propagated  artificially  adds  special  interest  to  the  study  of  these 
mollusks. 

Lakes  and  Ponds  as  the  Home  of  Mussels. 

Grenerally  speaking,  lakes  and  ponds  are  not  so  well  suited  to  the 
gn'owth  and  development  of  mussels  as  rivers  are ;  the  species  of  lake-  or 
pond-mussels  are  comparatively  few,  and  the  individuals  usually  some- 
what dwarfed.  Of  about  84  species  of  mussels  reported  for  the  State 
of  Indiana,  only  about  24  are  found  in  lakes,  and  not  all  of  these  in 
any  one  lake,  several  of  them  but  rarely  in  any.  Of  the  24  species 
occasionally  found  in  Indiana  lakes,  but  5  are  reported  only  in  lakes, 
and  only  3  or  4  of  the  species  common  to  both  lakes  and  rivers  seem  to 
prefer  lakes. 

In  rivers,  the  essential  feature  favorable  to  the  development  of  mus- 
sels is  the  current;  and  in  rivers  the  mussel  beds  reach  their  best  devel- 
opment on  riffles,  where  the  current  is  strongest.  The  importance  of  the 
current  to  the  well-being  of  the  mussels  is  indicated  by  the  position  these 
mollusks  naturally  assume  in  the  beds,  the  inhalent  and  exhalent  aper- 
tures of  the  creatures  being  upstream  against  the  current.  The  im- 
portance of  the  current  is  not  merely  as  a  bringer  of  food;  examina- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


252 

tions  show  that  the  mussels  of  the  plankton-rich  lakes  and  ponds 
usually  contain  more  food  material  than  those  of  the  rivers.  The  cur- 
rent gives  the  river-mussels  the  advantage  of  a  constant  change  of 
water,  which  means  a  more ,  abundant  supply  of  oxygen,  and  doubtless 
a  more  varied  supply  of  mineral  matter,  from  the  various  sorts  of 
soil  through  which  the  river  flows.  The  current  is  also  probably  of  con- 
siderable importance  in  assisting  in  the  fertilization  of  mussels,  one  of 
its  results  being  the  conveyance  of  sperm  from  mussels  in  upper  portions 
of  the  bed  to  other  mussels  below.  In  places  where  there  is  no  current, 
fertilization  must  be  more  largely  a  matter  of  chance. 

Although  the  majority  of  species  of  mussels  prefer  a  river  where 
there  is  a  good  current,  some  are  more  fitted  to  the  quieter  parts  of 
streams,  or  to  ponds.  These  are  chiefly  thin-shelled  species  with  weakly 
developed  or  undeveloped  hinge-teeth,  best  represented  by  the  genus 
Anodonta,  In  some  places  Anodontas  are  known  as  pond-mussels,  to 
distinguish  them  from  the  heavier  sorts,  or  river-mussels. 

The  distinction  between  lakes  and  rivers  is  not  constant  in  degree; 
we  have  all  sorts  of  gradations  from  the  extreme  form  of  lakes — 
isolated  bodies  without  outlet — through  lakes  with  relatively  large,  im- 
portant outlets,  to  such  lakes  as  are  simply  expansions  of  a  river-bed, 
examples  of  the  latter  type  being  Lake  Pepin,  Minn.,  of  the  upper  Mis- 
sissippi, and  the  former  English  Lake  in  Indiana,  an  expansion  of  the 
Kankakee.  As  a  usual  thing,  the  more  fluvatile  a  lake  is,  or  the  larger 
and  more  river-like  its  outlet,  the  more  river-like  will  be  its  mussel 
fauna,  both  in  abundance  and  species.  In  such  lakes  the  mussels  retain 
a  vital  continuity  with  the  mussel  beds  of  the  river.  In  the  less 
fluvatile  lakes  the  mussels  are  more  isolated,  and  there  is  more  in- 
breeding. The  large  number  (24)  of  lake-dwelling  species  recorded 
for  Indiana  is  due  to  the  fact  that  some  of  the  lakes  of  Indiana  are 
more  or  less  fluvatile,  and  contain  several  species  of  river  shells. 

Origin  and  Character  of  the  Maxinkuckee  Mussels. 
Lake  Maxinkuckee,  having  a  long,  narrow,  and  relatively  unim- 
portant outlet,  is  a  representative  of  one  of  the  less  fluvatile  types  of 
lakes,  forming  a  pretty  well  marked  contrast  to  the  various  lakes  cited 
above,  and  bearing  a  pretty  close  resemblance  to  the  neighboring  lakes, 
such  as  Twin  Lakes,  Pretty  Lake,  Bass  Lake,  etc. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


253 

The  Maxinkuckee  mussels  are  doubtless  derived  from  ancestors 
brought  up  the  Outlet  from  the  Tippecanoe  River  by  ascending  fishes. 
•  It  is  doubtful  whether  any  have  been  introduced  by  the  numerous  plants 
of  fish  in  the  lake,  though  such  a  thing  is  possible.  During  various 
times  the  lake  was  visited,  a  few  Tippecanoe  River  mussels  were 
planted  in  the  thoroughfare  between  the  lakes,  and  a  few  Yellow  River 
and  Kankakee  mussels  were  planted  in  the  main  lake. 

The  Outlet  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee  is  now  a  narrow,  shallow,  winding 
stream,  straightened  in  places  by  ditching,  and  bordered  on  each  side 
by  a  flat  sedgy  plain  which  indicates  the  former  breadth  and  importance 
of  the  stream.  The  colonization  of  the  lake  with  mussels  was  probably 
effected  chiefly  during  the  period  when  the  Outlet  was  a  broad  and 
relatively  important  stream.  The  situation  has  been  carefully  consid- 
ered and  seems  to  show  that  the  mussels  of  the  river  and  lake  are 
isolated  from  each  other  and  that  there  is  no  longer  any  vital  connec- 
tion between  them.  The  strongest  indication  of  the  independence  of  the 
lake  and  river  mussel  faunas  is  the  appearance  of  the  Maxinkuckee 
mussels  themselves;  these  are  lake-mussels,  easily  distinguished  for 
the  most  part  from  the  river-mussels  of  the  same  species,  and  many 
of  them  are  distinguishable  also  from  the  mussels  of  the  neighboring 
lakes. 

The  Tippecanoe  River  is  fairly  well  supplied  with  mussels.  Al- 
though the  number  of  species  is  considerably  fewer,  and  the  size  of  the 
individuals  is  generally  smaller  than  those  of  the  Wabash  into  which 
it  flows,  it  compares  very  favorably  with  rivers  of  its  size.  At  Belong, 
Ind.,  a  short  distance  above  the  mouth  of  the  Outlet  of  Lake  Maxin- 
kuckee, specimens  were  obtained  in  one  bed  representing  twenty-four 
species  of  mussels,  or  about  twice  the  number  of  kinds  found  in  Lake 
Maxinkuckee. 

Our  knowledge  of  the  extent  and  importance  of  migrations  of  fishes 
from  the  Tippecanoe  River  up  to  the  lake  and  from  the  lake  down  to  the 
river — a  question  which  has  a  marked  bearing  upon  the  relationship 
of  the  mussel  faunas — is  not  as  complete  as  it  should  be,  but  indications 
are  that  they  are  not  important  or  extensive.  Inasmuch  as  the  geo- 
graphic distribution  of  a  given  species  of  mussel  is  coextensive  with 
that  of  the  species  of  fish  which   serves  as  its  host,  this  question   is 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


254 

worthy  of  careful  consideration.  There  are  several  species  of  fishes  of 
the  Tippecanoe  River  (Etheostoma  camurum,  Hadropterus  evides,  Hy- 
bopsis  amblaps,  etc),  which  were  not  found  either  in  the  Outlet  or  in 
the  lakes,  and  other  species  (Hadroptertis  aspro,  Ericymba  bticcatcLf 
Diplesion  blennoides)  which  have  pushed  half  way  up  the  Outlet,  but 
were  found  no  further  up. 

In  this  connection,  the  mussel  fauna  of  the  Outlet  is  worthy  of  con- 
sideration, and  on  various  occasions,  but  especially  on  a  trip  down  the 
Outlet  September  30,  1907,  particular  attention  was  paid  to  this  feature. 

The  Outlet  is  not  particularly  well  suited  to  the  growth  and  life  of 
mussels.  The  bottom  is  either  a  firm  peaty  soil  or  fine  shifting  sand; 
moreover,  the  course  has  been  artificially  changed  in  some  places  and 
the  stream  has  naturally  shortened  its  length  in  others  by  making 
cutoffs.  In  addition  to  this  the  mussel  fauna  of  such  a  narrow  shallow 
stream  would  be  the  prey  of  muskrats,  minks,  etc.,  the  entire  length 
and  width  of  the  beds. 

On  the  trip  mentioned  above,  about  a  mile  below  Lost  Lake  a  fine 
example  of  Lampsilis  iris  was  found.  This  is  the  farthest  up  stream 
any  species  of  mussel  was  obtained,  and  as  this  species  is  fairly  common 
in  both  lakes  and  abundant  in  the  Tippecanoe  River,  we  have  here  the 
nearest  approach  to  a  continuous  fauna.  Some  dead  shells  but  no  living 
examples  of  Quadrula  undulata  were  found  a  little  farther  down. 
Farther  down  stream  from  a  quarter  to  half  a  mile,  a  short  distance 
above  the  second  cross-road  south  of  the  lake,  was  found  a  small  mussel- 
bed  of  about  forty  or  fifty  mussels,  the  great  majority  of  which  were 
Quadrula  undulata,  A  few  living  Lamrnlis  iris,  two  dead  Symphynota 
compressa,  one  living  Symphynota  costata  (gravid)  and  a  few  dead 
shells  of  Quadrula  coccmea,  complete  the  list.  Below  this  point  no  mus- 
sels were  found  until  near  where  the  Outlet  joins  the  Tippecanoe.  Here, 
a  few  rods  up  the  Outlet,  a  fair  bed  of  Quadrula  cocdnea  was  found. 
Of  the  five  species  of  mussels  found  in  the  Outlet,  only  two,  L.  iris  and 
Q.  cocdnea,  are  found  in  the  lake,  the  latter  but  rarely.  The  form  and 
general  appearance  of  the  Q.  undulata  of  the  Outlet  is  quite  peculiar 
and  they  can  be  picked  out  at  once  from  collections  from  the  various 
rivers  of  the  country.  They  are  unusually  elongate,  in  this  respect 
resembling  some  of  the  Tippecanoe  mussels  but  differing  from  them  in 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


255 

being  thinner,  and  in  having  the  furrows  between  the  plic«  unusually 
deep  and  sharp.  The  costse  on  the  posterodorsal  slope  are  very  marked, 
and  the  epidermis  is  jet  black.    The  umbones  are  considerably  eroded. 

Distribution  of  Mussels  in  the  Lake. 

In  rivers,  where  there  is  a  great  variety  of  conditions,  such  as  dif- 
ferences of  current,  bottom,  etc.,  one  finds  the  different  species  of  mus- 
sels inhabiting  different  localities  and  different  situations.  In  the  lakes, 
where  we  have  comparatively  few  species  of  mussels  and  not  such  im- 
portant differences  of  environment,  the  distribution  of  the  various 
species  is  much  the  same.  The  same  conditions,  such  as  rather  shallow 
water  and  moderately  firm  bottom,  are  equally  suitable  for  all.  A  few 
important  exceptions  may  be  noted,  as  for  example,  the  less  common 
species  of  the  lakes  are  often  more  or  less  local  in  distribution.  The 
only  well-marked  bed  of  Quadrula  rubiginosa  in  the  lakes  is  in  the  Lost 
Lake  mussel-bed  below  the  Bardsley  cottage,  and  this  is  the  only  place 
where  LampsUis  subrostrata  can  be  collected  in  any  considerable  num- 
bers. Lampsilis  glans  has  a  marked  preference  for  the  shallow  water 
at  the  edge  of  the  thoroughfare  between  the  lakes;  occasional  examples 
can,  however,  be  picked  up  almost  anywhere  along  the  shore,  and  it 
appears  to  be  increasing  considerably  along  shore  at  Long  Point.  Ano- 
danta  grandis  footiana,  which  can  live  in  softer  bottom  than  the  other 
mussels,  has  a  considerably  wider  distribution,  and  was  dredged  in 
deeper  water  than  any  of  the  other  mussels. 

The  mussels  are  to  be  found  almost  anywhere  in  water  from  2  to  5 
or  6  feet  deep  where  the  bottom  is  more  or  less  sandy  or  marly.  The 
beds  are  composed  chiefly  of  the  three  principal  species  of  the  lake, 
Lampsilis  luteola,  Unio  gibbosus  and  Anodanta  grandis  footiana,  with 
the  less  common  species  sparsely  interspersed.  Especially  good  mussel 
beds  occur  at  Long  Point,  along  shore  by  Farrar's  and  McDonald's, 
along  the  depot  grounds  in  Aubbenaubee  Bay  out  from  the  Military 
Academy,  and  in  the  shallow  water  just  beyond  the  mouth  of  Norris 
Inlet.  Mussels  are  fairly  well  scattered  from  Long  Point  more  or  less 
continuously  all  the  way  southward  to  beyond  Overmyer's  hill,  and  from 
a  little  north  of  the  ice-houses  all  the  way  around  to  the  Military 
Academy.     They  are  quite  abundant  in  the  neighborhood  of  Winfield's 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


256 

in  shallow  water,  and  occur  scattered  along  the  east  side  of  the  lake 
a  little  way  out  from  the  shore.  A  good  mussel  bed  is  found  in  Lost 
Lake  along  the  east  shore,  extending  from  a  little  south  of  the  Bardsley 
cottage  to  where  the  bullrushes  and  water  lilies  grow  thickly  in  the 
soft  black  muck  near  the  shore. 

Movements. — Closely  connected  with  the  question  of  distribution  is 
that  of  movement.  The  greater  number  of  mussels  of  the  lake,  espe- 
cially in  the  deeper  water,  spend  their  lives  in  a  state  of  quiescence. 
Young  mussels  appear  to  be  more  active  than  older  ones.  The  mussels 
retain  the  power  c*  locomotion  during  all  their  lives,  but  after  they 
have  got  well  settled  down,  they  only  occasionally  use  this  power.  The 
mussels  in  shallow  water  near  the  shore  move  into  greater  depths  at 
the  approach  of  cold  weather  in  late  autumn  or  early  winter  and  bury 
themselves  more  deeply  in  the  sand.  This  movement  is  rather  irregular 
and  was  not  observed  every  year.  It  was  strikingly  manifest  in  the 
late  autumn  of  1913,  when  at  one  of  the  piers  off  Long  Point  a  large 
number  of  furrows  was  observed  heading  straight  into  deep  water, 
with  a  mussel  at  the  outer  end  of  each.  The  return  of  the  mussels  to 
shore  during  the  spring  and  summer  was  not  observed.  Many  of  them 
are  probably  washed  shoreward  by  the  strong  waves  of  the  spring  and 
summer  storms,  and  some  are  carried  shoreward  by  muskrats  and 
dropped  there.  Occasional  mussels  were  observed  moving  about  in 
midwinter,  even  in  rather  deep  water.  During  the  winter  of  1900-1901, 
an  example  of  Lampsilis  luteolaf  in  rather  deep  water  in  the  vicinity  of 
Winfield's,  was  observed  to  have  moved  about  18  inches  in  a  few  days. 
Its  track  could  distinctly  be  seen  through  the  clear  ice. 

As  a  result  of  the  quiescence  of  the  lake  mussels,  the  posterior  half 
or  third  of  the  shells,  which  projects  up  from  the  lake  bottom,  is  usually 
covered  by  a  thick  marly  concretion  which  appears  to  be  a  mixture  of 
minute  algse  and  lime.  This  marly  concretion  grows  concentrically, 
forming  rounded  nodules,  its  development  increasing  with  the  age  and 
size  of  the  shell.  This  concretion,  though  most  abundant  on  shells,  is 
not  confined  entirely  to  them,  but  grows  also  on  rocks  that  have  lain 
undisturbed  cm  the  bottom.  When  growing  on  shells,  it  adheres  to  them 
very  closely;  ^md  upon  being  pried  loose  sometimes  separates  from  them 
.KiTith    as    the    matrix    separates    from    a    fossil,    and    leaves    the    epi- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


257 

dermis  of  the  mussel  clean.  In  other  cases  it  adheres  more  closely  and 
is  difficult  to  scrape  off  clean.  On  this  marly  growth,  colonies  of 
Ophrydiunif  much  the  size,  color,  and  general  appearance  of  grapes 
with  the  skin  removed,  are  often  found  growing,  and  in  the  cavities  and 
interstices  of  the  marl,  a  handsome  little  water-beetle,  Stenelmis  sulcatus 
Blatchley,  and  its  peculiar  elongate  black  larvs,  lives  in  considerable 
numbers  but  apparently  has  nothing  to  do  with  the  mussels.  Various 
species  of  hydrachnids,  one  of  them  strikingly  handsome  with  its  green 
body  sprinkled  with  bright  red  dots,  also  live  in  the  cavity  of  the  marl, 
and  offer  some  suggestion  as  to  how  the  parasitic  mite  Atax  went  a 
step  farther  and  took  up  its  habitation  within  the  mussel  itself. 

Food  and  Feeding, — An  examination  of  the  stomach  and  intestinal 
contents  of  the  various  species  of  mussels  of  the  lake  showed  no  notice- 
able difference  between  the  food  of  the  different  species.  Enough  of 
the  bottom  mud  is  generally  present  to  give  the  food  mass  the  color  of 
the  bottom  on  which  the  mussels  are  found.  Thus  the  stomach-contents 
of  the  mussels  found  in  the  black  bottom  of  Lost  Lake  were  usually 
blackish,  while  that  of  those  found  in  the  lighter  bottom  at  Long  Point 
were  grayish.  Intermixed,  however,  with  the  whole  mass  was  always 
enough  algae  to  give  it  a  somewhat  greenish  tinge,  this  grreen  being 
usually  intermixed  more  or  less  in  the  form  of  flakes.  A  striking  con- 
trast between  the  stomach  contents  of  mussels  inhabiting  lakes  and 
those  found  in  rivers  is  the  much  greater  preponderance  of  organic 
matter  in  the  food  of  the  lake  mussels.  The  stomach  contents  of  river- 
mussels  is  generally  chiefly  mud,  with  a  few  diatoms,  desmids.  See- 
nedsmus  and  Pediastrum  intermixed,  as  said  above.  Those  of  the  lake 
mussels  are  almost  always  full  enough  of  algae  to  be  more  or  less  flecked 
with  grreen  and  sometimes  the  whole  mass  is  decidedly  gn*eenish.  On 
being  placed  in  a  vial  of  preserving  fluid  (3  per  cent  formalin  was  gen- 
erally used)  and  shaken,  the  material  from  the  river  mussels  always 
retains  the  uniform  appearance  of  mud;  that  from  the  lake  mussels 
separates,  the  mud  settling  to  the  bottom  and  the  organic  material 
settling  as  a  light  flocculent  mass  above  the  more  solid  portion.  This 
top  layer  is  composed  of  the  various  plankton  elements  of  the  lake,  and 
was  found  to  vary  considerably  in  different  lakes.  In  the  Lake  Maxin- 
kuckee  mussels  it  was  found  to  consist  chiefly  of  such  species  as  Mt- 

17—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


258 

crocystih.  xruginosa,  Botryoccus  braunii^  CcBlosphssnum  kuetzingior- 
num,  various  diatoms,  such  as  species  of  Navicula,  Rhoicosphenia,  Gom- 
phenema,  Cyclotella,  and  Cocconema,  various  forms  of  desmids,  espe- 
cially Cosmarium  .and  Staurastrum,  various  forms  of  Scenedesmus, 
considerable  Peridinium  tabulatum,  and  short  filaments  of  Lyngbya, 
Pediastrum,  both  boryanum  and  duplex,  are  here,  as  almost  everywhere, 
rather  common  objects  encountered  in  the  intestines  of  mussels.  Casts 
of  the  rotifer  Ajiurxa  cochlearis,  and  one  of  the  small  entomostracan, 
Chydorus,  were  occasionally  encountered.  In  one  of  the  Lost  Lake  mus- 
sels, Dinobryon,  an  exceedingly  frequent  element  of  the  mussel-food  in 
Lake  Amelia,  Minn.,  but  rare  here,  was  found. 

No  opportunities  were  had  to  study  the  stomach  contents  during 
the  winter,  the  mussel  work  having  not  been  taken  up  to  any  extent 
during  the  earlier  part  of  the  survey.  Mussels  obtained  quite  late  in 
autumn  contained  much  the  same  material  as  in  summer.  The  open 
and  apparently  active  inhalent  and  exhalent  apertures  noted  through- 
out the  winter  in  some  individuals  would  indicate  that  the  mussels — at 
least  some  of  them — do  not  hibernate,  but  carry  on  life  processes  more 
or  less  actively  the  year  round.  The  presence  of  pretty  well-marked 
growth  rings  would  indicate,  however,  annual  rest  periods.  As  diatoms 
appear  to  be  much  more  abundant  in  the  water  during  the  winter,  it  is 
probable  that  they  enter  more  plentifully  into  the  mussel's  bill-of-fare 
during  the  late  autumn,  winter,  and  early  spring,  than  during  the  sum- 
mer. In  considering  the  mussels  as  feeders  on  plankton  elements,  it  is 
worth  while  to  investigate  whether  these  are  not  of  benefit  to  the  lake 
as  reducers  of  the  excessive  amounts  of  such  undesirable  elements  as 
Lyngbya,  Anabxna  and  Microcystis,  and  whether  a  considerable  in- 
crease in  the  mussel  population  by  means  of  artificial  propagation  would 
not  clear  up  the  lake  to  a  considerable  extent. 

The  following  studies  of  stomach  contents  and  table  of  mussel  food 
are  by  no  means  exhaustive,  but  represent  hurried  examinations  and  a 
record  of  the  more  easily  recognized  forms  out  of  a  mass  of  doubtful 
material.    They  are  intended  to  be  simply  suggestive. 

Closely  connected  with  the  question  of  food  and  nutrition  is  that  of 
the  size  of  the  mussels.  A  marked  feature  of  the  mussels  of  Lake 
Maxinkuckee,  as  well  as  of  the  neighboring  lakes,  is  the  dwarfing  of 
many  of  the  species,  and  this  is  rather  difficult  to  explain  when  one 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


259 

considers  the  large  amount  of  organic  material  they  ingest.  The  mus- 
sels of  a  few  northern  lakes  examined  were  thick-shelled  and  large. 
So  this  dwarfing  may  not  be  necessarily  associated  with  lake  conditions, 
that  is,  absence  of  current.  A  possible  explanation  is  that  of  close  in- 
breeding, there  being  no  admixture  of  new  blood  with  other  distant 
colonies,  such  as  is  possible  where  the  lake  Is  in  close  connection  with 
a  large  river  and  its  mussel  beds. 

Breeding  Habits,  Reproduction,  etc, — The  reference  to  inbreeding 
above  leads  to  a  consideration  of  breeding  and  breeding  habits.  At  first 
glance  it  would  appear  that  lakes,  having  no,  or  only  feeble,  currents, 
would  make  fertilization  of  the  ova  of  the  female  mussels  largely  a 
question  of  chance.  It  is  not  possible,  with  the  data  at  hand,  to  make 
precise  comparisons  between  number  of  gravid  females  of  the  mussels 
of  lakes  and  rivers  during  the  proper  seasons,  but  the  general  impression 
gained  from  having  examined  the  various  mussels  of  numerous  lakes  and 
rivers  through  the  different  seasons  is  that  there  are  fewer  of  the 
mussels  of  the  lake  that  succeed  in  having  their  ova  fertilized.  Gravid 
mussels  are  indeed  not  rare  in  the  lake  at  proper  seasons,  but  they 
seem  to  be  much  fewer  than  one  might  expect.  On  October  17,  1907, 
for  example,  of  252  Lampsilis  luteola  examined,  41  were  of  the  charac- 
teristic female  form  but  only  25  were  gravid.  Likewise,  of  18  Ano- 
dontas  examined  on  the  same  date,  only  2  were  g^ravid.  This  is  a  con- 
siderably lower  percentage  than  one  would  expect  in  rivers  at  this  date. 
There  are  other  indications  that  the  functions  of  reproduction  are  much 
less  prominent  in  the  lake  than  in  rivers.  In  the  height  of  the  spawn- 
ing season  certain  species  of  mussels,  especially  Lampsilis  ventricosa 
and  L,  multiradiata,  exhibit,  in  the  neighboring  rivers,  a  very  striking 
appearance,  due  to  the  excessive  development  and  high  coloration  of 
portions  of  the  mantle  near  the  inhalent  aperture.  Though  both  these 
species  are  found  in  the  lake,  none  was  observed  in  this  condition.  In 
some  rivers  in  densely  crowding  beds,  moreover,  one  frequently  en- 
counters precocious  individuals;  small  shells,  usually  apparently  only 
2  or  3  years  old  but  gravid  with  the  characteristic  female  contour  mark- 
edly developed.  This  is  possibly  related  to  opportunities  of  fertiliza- 
tion of  ova,  and  is  most  frequently  observed  in  L.  ventricosa  and  L. 
luteola.     No  such  precociously  developed  mussels  were  found  in  the  lakes. 

A  large  and  well  developed  female  Lampsilis  ventricosa  was  trans- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


260 

planted  from  Yellow  River  into  Lake  Maxinkuckee.  On  being  examined 
two  years  later  in  the  autumn,  when  this  species  is  usually  gravid,  it 
was  found  to  be  sterile. 

The  natural  infection  of  fishes  of  the  lake  with  the  glochidia  of 
the  mussels  does  not  appear  to  be  common.  The  grills  of  an  immense 
number  of  fishes  were  examined  for  parasites,  but  no  glochidia  were 
noted.  Some  young  bluegills  and  redeyes,  exposed  to  the  glochidia  of 
L.  luteola  in  the  autumn  of  1912,  took  very  readily. 

The  young  mussels  were  either  few,  or  very  difficult  to  find.  Dili- 
gent search  was  made  for  them,  especially  in  the  sandy  bottom  near 
Long  Point,  the  sand  being  scooped  up  and  seived  through  fine-meshed 
selves.  Numerous  and  varied  forms  of  life  were  thus  obtained,  such 
as  Sphxrium,  Pisidium,  caddis  cases,  etc.,  and  rather  small  but  by  no 
means  minute  examples  of  L.  luteola  found.  These  young  shells  were 
remarkably  brightly  rayed.  Half-grown  Q.  rubiginosa  were  fairly  com- 
mon in  the  beds  of  Lost  Lake. 

Proportion  of  Various  Species  in  the  Lake, — Of  a  collection  of  340 
living  mussels  collected  October  17,  1907,  at  Long  Point,  252  were 
Lampsilis  luteola,  41  L.  ventricosa,  21  Unio  gibbosus,  18  Anodonta 
grandis  footiana,  6  Strophitus  edentulus,  and  3  Lampsilis  subrostrata. 
In  deep  water  U.  gibbosus  and  Anodonta  would  have  g^ven  a  higher  per- 
centage, and  in  the  Lost  Lake  beds  Quadrula  rubiginosa  would  be  present 
in  considerable  relative  abundance. 

Parasites,  Enemies^  and  Diseases. — As  a  general  rule  the  mussels 
of  lakes,  ponds  and  bayous  are  more  heavily  infested  with  parasites 
than  those  of  the  swiftly  flowing  rivers,  the  probable  reason  being  that 
in  still  waters  the  parasites  can  migrate  more  easily  from  one  mussel 
to  another  than  where  there  is  a  swift  current.  The  mussels  of  the 
lake  are  not  nearly  so  badly  parasitized  as  those  of  the  sloughs  of  the 
Mississippi,  the  dead  waters  in  the  Maumee  above  the  dams,  or  those 
of  the  Twin  Lakes  a  few  miles  to  the  north.  The  parasites  will  be 
taken  up  more  fully  in  consideration  of  the  various  species  of  mussels. 
Several  species  of  Atax,  and  Cotylaspis  insignis  are  the  most  common 
pdrasites.  Unlike  the  mussels  of  most  of  our  rivers,  the  mussels  of  the 
lakes  are  comparatively  exempt  from  destruction  by  man.  A  few  are 
killed  and  used  for  bait,  and  now  and  then  a  mild  case  of  pearl  fever 
appears  at  the  lake,  but  it  is  soon  cured  by  the  examination  of  a  bushel 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


261 

or  two  of  mussels.  On  September  22,  1907,  a  man  was  seen  at  the 
south  end  of  the  lake  with  about  a  peck  of  shells  which  he  had  opened 
in  a  vain  search  for  pearls;  on  October  8  of  the  same  year,  a  pile  of 
about  a  half  bushel  of  shells,  which  had  evidently  been  opened  by 
pearlers,  was  found  in  Overmyer's  woods.  Another  pearler  was  seen 
in  1907  who  had  collected  a  few  slugs  of  almost  no  value.  One  of  the 
citizens  of  Culver,  in  1906,  submitted  a  small  vial  of  lake  baroques  for 
valuation,  but  they  had  no  worth  whatever.  The  greatest  enemy  of  the 
lake  mussels  is  the  muskrat,  and  its  depredations  are  for  the  most  part 
confined  to  the  mussels  near  shore.  The  muskrat  does  not  usually 
begin  its  mussel  diet  until  rather  late  in  autumn,  when  much  of  the 
succulent  vegetation  upon  which  it  feeds  has  been  cut  down  by  the 
frost.  Some  autumns,  however,  they  begin  much  earlier  than  others; 
a  scarcity  of  vegetation  or  an  abimdance  of  old  muskrats  may  have 
much  to  do  with  this.  The  rodent  usually  chooses  for  its  feeding 
grounds  some  object  projecting  out  above  the  water,  such  as  a  pier  or 
the  top  of  a  fallen  tree.  Near  or  under  such  objects  one  occasionally 
finds  large  piles  of  shells.  The  muskrat  apparently  has  no  especial 
preference  for  one  species  of  mussel  above  another,  but  naturally  sub- 
sists most  freely  on  the  most  abundant  species.  These  shell  piles  are 
excellent  places  to  search  for  the  rarer  shells  of  the  lake. 

On  September  24,  1907,  about  a  bushel  of  shells,  recently  cleaned 
out  by  muskrats,  was  found  at  Long  Point  where  a  pier  had  been 
removed  not  long  before.  The  shells  were  all  of  rather  small  size  and 
were  in  about  18  inches  of  water.  About  half  were  taken  and  examined. 
Of  these  shells,  358  were  Lampsilis  luteola,  167  Unio  gibbosus,  6  Lamp- 
sUis  iris  and  1  Lampsilis  multiradiata.  In  the  autumn  of  1913  freshly 
oi>ened  shells  of  Lampsilis  glans  were  common  along  shore  at  Long 
Point.  The  first  shells  killed  are  rather  small  and  are  probably  killed 
by  young  muskrats. 

In  the  winter  after  the  lake  is  frozen,  great  cracks  in  the  ice  ex- 
tend out  from  shore  in  various  directions,  and  this  enables  the  muskrat 
to  extend  his  depredations  some  distance  from  shore  in  definite  limited 
directions.  During  the  winter  of  1904  a  muskrat  was  observed  feeding 
on  mussels  along  the  broad  ice-crack  that  extended  from  the  end  of 
Long  Point  northeastward  across  the  lake.  The  ^nuskrat  was  about 
fifty  feet  from  the  shore.    It  repeatedly  dived  from  the  edge  of  the  ice- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


262 

crack,  and  reappeared  with  a  mussel  in  its  mouth.  Upon  reaching  the 
surface  with  its  catch,  it  sat  down  on  its  haunches  on  the  edge  of  the 
crack,  and,  holding  the  mussel  in  its  front  feet,  pried  the  valves  apart 
with  its  teeth  and  scooped  or  licked  out  the  contents  of  the  shell.  Some 
of  the  larger  mussels  were  too  strong  for  it  to  open,  and  a  part  of  these 
were  left  lying  on  the  ice.  The  bottom  of  the  lake  near  Long  Point, 
and  also  over  by  Norris's,  is  well  paved  by  shells  that  have  been  killed 
by  muskrats.  Muskrats  do  not  seem  to  relish  the  gills  of  gravid  mus- 
sels; these  parts  are  occasionally  found  untouched  where  the  animal 
had  been  feeding. 

Species  of  Mussels  Occurring  in  Lake  Maxinkuckee. 

1.  Quadrula  coccinea  (Conrad). 

Rare  at  the  lake;  this  is  a  river  rather  than  a  lake  shell  and  would 
be  expected  in  abundance  only  in  fluviatile  lakes,  or  lakes  with  broad  short 
outlets  and  vital  connection  with  river  faunas.  The  few  living  mussels 
of  this  species  found  in  the  lake  would  probably  represent  a  vanishing 
remnant  of  a  fauna  introduced  when  the  lake  had  a  broader  outlet  than 
at  present  and  communication  with  the  river  below  more  active.  A  few 
dead  shells  were  found  along  the  north  shore  at  various  times.  On 
October  25,  1907,  a  shell  1.75  inch  long  was  found  near  the  railroad 
bridge  at  Culver,  and  in  1909  another  small  shell  was  found  along 
shore  at  Aubeenaubee  Bay.  Some  fine  large  examples,  brought  up  from 
the  Tippecanoe  were  planted  in  the  thoroughfare  below  the  railroad 
bridge,  but  they  have  probably  been  covered  and  suffocated  by  sand. 

2.  Quadrula  rubiginosa  (Lea). 

More  common  in  Lake  Maxinkuckee  than  Q,  coccinea^  but  neverthe- 
less rather  rare,  only  a  few  dwarfed  shells  having  been  found.  In  Lost 
Lake  below  the  Bardsley  cottage  it  was  a  fairly  common  species.  None 
of  the  shells  found  was  of  large  size,  but  all  were  well-formed  and  hand- 
some. The  older  shells  are  almost  jet  black  and  peculiarly  elongate, 
with  the  umbones  markedly  anterior  in  position.  They  look  considerably 
unlike  those  of  either  the  Tippecanoe  or  Yellow  River,  but  a  form  much 
like  the  Lost  Lake  shells  was  found  in  the  lower  course  of  the  Kankakee. 
No  gravid  examples  were  found  in  the  lake.  Half  grown  examples  are 
rather  common  in  Lost  Lake,  but  as  they  are  usually  buried  consider- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


263 

ably  deeper  in  the  sand  than  the  older  shells,  they  are  harder  to  find. 
These  half-grown  shells  are  of  a  peculiarly  beautiful  golden  yellow 
color  with  a  satiny  epidermis,  and  are  of  the  same  shape  as  those  found 
in  the  neighboring  rivers,  that  is,  the  normal  or  usual  shape  of  the 
species.  The  peculiar  elongate  form  of  the  adult  is  therefore  evidently 
the  product  of  local  influences.  The  young  shells  are  very  iridescent 
and  translucent,  much  more  so  than  those  found  in  rivers. 

Q.  ruhiginosa  is  at  its  best  a  very  fair  button  shell,  but  the  lake 
shells  are  too  small  to  work  up  well.  This  species  appears  to  be  rather 
rare  in  lakes.  The  only  lake  examples  of  this  species  with  which  the 
Lost  Lake  shells  were  compared  were  some  obtained  in  Lake  Erie.  The 
Lake  Erie  shells  are  much  more  dwarfed,  but  very  solid. 

Food. 

The  following  is  the  result  of  an  examination  of  the  material  found 
in  the  intestines  of  Q.  ruhiginosa  from  Lost  Lake. 

Sample  1.  August  2,  1908.  Mass  fine  flocculent  rather  brownish 
green  material,  cohering  somewhat  in  cylinders;  looks  as  if  chiefly 
organic;  not  gritty  to  touch.  Organisms  present:  Scenedesmus,  Fra- 
gilaria,  Tetraedron,  Navicula,  Peridinium  tabulatiimf  Anurxa,  and  Bo- 
tryococcus  braunii. 

Sample  2.  August  20,  1908.  A  large  amount  of  material.  Appear- 
ance in  vial:  bottom  black,  top  a  fine  flocculent  sediment.  In  the  top 
material  are  Tetraedrorif  Scenedesmus^  Microcystis  seriginosa  and  many 
disassociated  minute  cells.  Black  bottom  composed  of  Anurxa,  Lyngbya 
xstuarii,  a  long  filament;  Scenedesmus,  many  Peridinium  tabulatum, 
Tetraedron,  Epithemia  Uirgida,  Merismopcsdia,  cast  of  Cyclops,  Melo- 
sira  crenulata,  Glasocapsa,  Staurastrum,  PedioLstrum  boryanum,  Gom- 
phonema,  Cksetophora,  Cos7narium,  sponge  spicule,  Gomphosphseria 
aponina,  and  Botryococcus  braunii. 

Sample  3.  August  20,  1908.  A  small  amount  of  flocculent  brownish 
material.  Microcystis  xruginosa,  Peridinium  tabulatum  many,  and  a 
good  many  empty  cuirasses,  Chydorus,  Eudorina,  a  few;  Scenedesmus, 
common;  Diatoms,  Pediastnim  duplex. 

Sample  4.  August  20,  1908.  Fine  blue-green  flocculent  material. 
Lyngbya  xstuarii,  several  filaments;   Microcystis  xniginosa,  common; 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


264 

Ccelosphxrium  kuetzingianum,  Peridinium  tabulaturn,  very  abundant; 
Chydorus,  Anurxa,  Botryococcus  braunii,  Coslastrum,  Staurastrum  1, 
small.     Naviculas,  several. 

Sample  5.  August  20,  1908.  Fine  bluish-green  material.  Peri- 
dinium tabulatum,  abundant;  Cocconema  cymbiformef  Navicula,  a  few; 
Anurxa  cochlearisy  Microcystis  xruginosa,  Chydorus ,  1  entire,  and  other 
fragments;  Pediastrum  duplex,  Ccslosphierium  kuetzingianum;  Cos- 
marium,  Coscinodiscus,  Scenedesmus,  very  common;  Merismopcedia 
glauca. 

Sample  6.  August  20,  1908.  A  small  amount  of  flocculent  grayish 
material.  Peridinium  tabulatum,  abundant,  agglutinated  in  masses; 
Microcystis  mruginosa,  very  common;  Navicula,  Staurastrum,  Cos- 
marium,  several;  Chydorus,  fragment;  Scenedesmus,  small  forms,  com- 
mon; Pediastrum  boryanum,  Cocconema  cymbiforme,  Tetraedron,  com- 
mon; various  diatoms;  Rotifer,  an  elongate  species;  Merismopc^ia 
glauca;  Ccelastrum,  Desmids. 

Sample  7.  August  21,  1908.  A  small  amount  of  rather  coherent 
fine  flocculent  greenish  material.  Peridinium  tabulatum,  very  common; 
Anuraea  cochlearis,  a  few;  Microcystis  aeruginosa,  frequent;  Lyngbya 
xstuaria,  short  filament;  Pediastrum  boryanum,  Cocconema  cymbiforme, 
Cymatopleura,  Epithemia  argus,  Gom,phonema,  Synedra,  Tetraedron, 
Scenedesmus,  occasional;  Dinobryon,  Staurastrum,  rather  slender  form. 

Sample  8.  August  20,  1908.  A  small  amount  of  flocculent  bluish 
material.  Peridinium  tabulatum,  most  abundant;  Co^losphxrium  kuet- 
zingianum; Pediastrufn  duplex.  Microcystis  aeruginosa,  Anurxa  coch- 
learis. Sponge  spicule.  Diatoms  (Navicula,  Cocconema,  etc.),  Scenedes- 
mus. 

Sample  9.  August  20,  1908;  a  fair  amount  of  flocculent  grayish 
brown  material  with  a  greenish  cast.  Peridinium  tabulatum,  most 
abundant;  Microcystis  mruginosa,  Anursea  cochlearis,  Staurastrum, 
Pediastrum  duplex,  Botryococcus  braunii;  Tetraedron  minimum,  Caelos- 
phssrium  kuetzingianum;  Pediastrum  boryanum,  Chydorus,  Lynbya 
mstuarii,  Gloeocupsa,  Diatoms — Cocconema  cymbiforme,  Navicula. 

3.     Unio  gibbosus  Barnes. 

This  mussel,  known  among  clammers  as  the  "spike"  or  "lady- 
finger"  is,  next  to  Lampsilis  luteola,  the  most  abundant  shell  in  the  lake. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


265 

It  is  found  wherever  the  other  mussels  are;  that  is,  in  sandy  or  some- 
what marly  bottom  in  rather  shallow  water  most  of  the  way  around 
the  lake,  and  in  the  shell-bed  in  Lost  Lake  below  Bardsley's.  In  Lake 
Maxinkuckee  one  of  the  best  beds  is  at  Long  Point.  It  is  abundant  also 
at  Norris  Inlet,  and  by  McDonald's  and  Farrar's. 

No  very  young  of  this  species  were  found  in  the  lake;  they  are, 
however,  hard  to  find  in  numbers  anywhere,  even  in  rivers  where  the 
species  is  abundant — except  in  cases  where  portions  of  the  river  go 
almost  dry,  and  this  of  course  never  happens  to  the  beds  in  the  lake. 
The  half-grown  examples  are  solid,  rather  cylindrical  shells,  the  same 
neat  form  that  is  known  as  the  "spike"  among  the  clammers.  The 
old  shells  develop  into  a  peculiar  form,  being  flattened,  arcuate  along 
the  ventral  border  and  very  thin  posteriorly,  so  that  they  usually  crack 
badly  in  drying;  they  represent  the  form  described  by  Simpson  as  vai. 
delicata.  In  general  outline  they  remind  one  somewhat  of  Margaritnna 
monodonta.  This  form  is  not  strictly  confined  to  the  lake;  some  similar 
shells  were  collected  in  the  Wabash  near  Terre  Haute. 

As  found  in  the  lake.  Unto  gibbosus  is  very  constant  in  its  charac- 
ters, the  only  noteworthy  difference  between  individuals  being  the  change 
in  shape  already  referred  to  as  being  due  to  age.  In  rivers  this  shell 
exhibits  considerable  variation  in  shape,  size,  color  of  nacre,  etc.,  but  the 
shells  of  the  lake  are  quite  constant  in  almost  every  respect.  The  nacre 
is  a  deep  purple,  never  varying  to  pink  or  white  as  it  frequently  does  in 
rivers. 

Like  Lampsilis  luteola  this  species  is  frequently  preyed  upon  by 
muskrats  and  the  cleaned  out  shells  are  common  where  these  rodents 
have  had  their  feasts. 

Although  U,  gibbosus  of  the  Tippecanoe  River  near  the  mouth  of  the 
Outlet  are  very  commonly  infested  with  a  distomid  parasite  along  thp 
hinge-line  which  brings  about  the  formation  of  irregular  baroques,  this 
parasite  does  not  occur  in  the  lake  so  far  as  known.  Small  species  of 
Atiix  are  common  parasites  of  this  species  in  the  lake,  and  in  1909  one 
was  found  affected  by  the  large  Atax  ingens. 

Even  the  large  strong  river  shells  of  Unio  gibbosus  have  as  yet 
no  value  in  the  manufacture  of  buttons  because  of  their  purple  color, 
and  lack  of  luster.     (The  white-nacred  shells  are  sometimes  used.) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


266 

The  only  other  lake  examples  with  which  the  Lake  Maxinkuckee 
specimens  of  this  species  have  been  compared,  are  some  collected  in 
Lake  Erie  at  Put-in-Bay.  The  Lake  Erie  shells  are  much  unlike  the 
Maxinkuckee  specimens,  being  short,  humped  and  remarkably  solid  and 
heavy.  Similar  shells  to  those  of  Lake  Erie  are  found  in  some  of  the 
small  southern  rivers. 

We  have  no  notes  referring  to  gravid  examples  in  the  lake.  This 
was  probably  because  the  most  active  work  in  collecting  and  examining 
mussels  was  carried  on  in  the  autumn,  and  the  breeding  period  of  this 
species  is  in  early  summer. 

4.  Alasmidonta  calceola  (Lea). 

Judging  from  the  dead  shells  found  scattered  along  shore,  this  is 
not  a  particularly  rare  species  in  the  lake.  The  shells  were  found  most 
abundantly  along  the  north  shore  of  the  lake,  although  they  were  also 
found  along  the  east  and  southeast  portion  and  were  not  infrequent 
between  Arling^n  and  Long  Point.  No  living  examples  were  found. 
On  account  of  its  small  size  and  its  habits,  this  is  a  rather  difficult  species 
to  And,  even  where  common,  except  under  favorable  conditions  such  as 
exceptionally  low  water,  when  the  mussels  move  about  more  or  less. 
Nothing  was  therefore  learned  of  its  habits  in  the  lake.  In  the  Tippe- 
canoe River  near  Delong,  Ind.,  this  species  was  rather  common  in  stiff 
blue  clay  near  shore,  and  it  is  fairly  abundant  in  Yellow  River  at  Ply- 
mouth. Here,  although  the  dead  shells  were  common,  the  living  examples 
were  difficult  to  find  until,  during  a  period  of  very  low  water,  they 
began  actively  moving  about  and  could  be  tracked  down.  The  species, 
which  reaches  an  unusually  large  size  in  Yellow  River,  was  there  found 
gravid  in  autumn  (September  and  October).  The  glochidia  are  of  the 
Anodonta  type,  chestnut-shaped  or  rounded-triangular  in  outline,  with 
large  hooks  at  the  ventral  tips  of  the  valves. 

5.  Anodonta  grandis  footiana  (Lea).  , 

Although  the  genus  Anodonta  is  generally  regarded  as  the  "Pond- 
mussel"  par  excellence,  the  species  of  which  might  naturally  be  expected 
to  be  at  home  in  lakes  and  ponds  and  thrive  in  such  places  even  better 
than  in  rivers,  the  Anodantas  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee  show,  along  with  the 
river  species  proper,  the  dwarfing  influence  of  the  lake.  Moreover,  Ano- 
donta is  not  as  one  might  naturally  expect,  the  most  abundant  mussel  in 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


267 

the  lake,  but  is  outnumbered,  in  some  beds  at  least,  by  both  Lampsilis 
luteola  and  Unio  gibbosus.  Its  relative  scarcity  in  some  of  the  shore  beds 
is  in  part  made  up  by  its  wider  distribution  in  the  deeper  waters  of  the 
lake  than  the  others  reach,  and  on  its  presence  on  the  isolated  bars, 
where  it  was  occasionally  taken  up  by  the  dredge. 

On  account  of  the  great  variability  of  Anodonta  grandis  and  the 
difficulty  in  distinguishing  the  various  forms,  particular  attention  was 
paid  to  this  species  as  found  in  the  lake,  and  the  lake  specimens  were  com- 
pared with  numerous  examples  from  the  neighboring  lakes  and  river. 
No  Anodontas  were  found  in  the  Tippecanoe  River  near  Lake  Maxin- 
kuckee  Outlet,  and  we  were  therefore  unable  to  compare  our  lake  speci- 
mens with  the  form  that  would  be  most  interesting  in  this  connection. 

The  mussels  of  Tippecanoe  Lake  at  the  head  of  Tippecanoe  River 
were  examined  in  this  connection.  Blatchley  (Indiana  Geological  Report 
for  1900,  p.  190)  has  reported  Anodonta  grandis  as  common,  and  the 
subspecies  footiana  as  frequent  in  Tippecanoe  Lake.  The  Anodontas 
of  that  lake  differ  markedly  both  in  the  size  and  shape  of  the  individuals 
from  those  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee.  The  difference  in  size  can  be  easily 
explained  by  the  more  favorable  conditions  in  Tippecanoe  Lake.  This 
body  of  water  is  more  fluviatile  than  Lake  Maxinkuckee,  being  directly 
connected  with  the  Tippecanoe  River,  which  is  already  a  fairly  large 
stream  when  it  leaves  the  lake,  and  the  mussel  beds  of  the  lake  and  river 
are  continuous.  The  upper  part  of  Tippecanoe  Lake  is  exceptionally 
favorable  for  Anodontas;  the  living  mussels  are  large  and  abundant, 
and  the  dead  shells  almost  pave  the  bottom  near  shore,  several  dead 
shells  often  being  telescoped  within  each  other.  Some  of  the  shells 
reached  a  size  not  often  surpassed  in  the  neighboring  rivers;  one  example 
measuring  172.5  mm.  long,  95  mm.  high  and  65  mm.  in  diameter.  A 
few  were  thickened  with  a  tendency  to  form  half  pearls,  or  "blisters", 
but  most  were  thin.  A  number  of  the  shells  approached  Anodonta  cor- 
pulenta  in  general  form,  and  one  flattened,  rounded  shell  resembled  A. 
subarbiculata.  The  Anodontas  from  other  lakes  of  the  Tippecanoe  River 
system,  such  as  Center  Lake  and  Eagle  Lake  near  Warsaw,  resemble 
those  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee,  but  are  generally  smaller  and  shorter. 

The  Anodontas  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee  were  also  compared  with  those 
of  Yellow  River  a  few  miles  to  the  north,  and  with  the  various  lakes 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


268 

of  the  Kankakee  system,  including  Upper  Fish  Lake,  Lake  of  the  Woods 
(Marshall  Co.)  Pretty  Lake,  Twin  Lakes,  Bass  Lake  and  Cedar  Lake. 
Some  of  the  Yellow  River  Anodontas  were  normal,  oval  shells  such  as 
are  common  in  the  rivers  of  Northern  Indiana;  a  few  were  exceptionally 
thin  and  exceedingly  inflated,  resembling  A,  corpulenta.  Those  of 
Upper  Fish  Lake — originally  a  fluviatile  lake  containing  other  fluviatile 
shells  such  as  Q,  undulata — were  large  shells  like  those  of  Tippecanoe 
Lake.  The  Anodontas  of  each  of  the  other  lakes  differed  more  or  less 
from  those  of  the  others,  though  all  probably  had  a  common  origin.  The 
only  lake  of  this  group  the  Anodontas  of  which  closely  resembled  those 
of  Lake  Maxinkuckee  is  Bass  Lake,  and  even  there  the  shells  were  some- 
what different,  being  smaller  and  with  the  epidermis  more  deeply  stained. 
Even  the  Anodontas  of  Lost  Lake  differ  slightly  from  those  of  Lake 
Maxinkuckee,  being  somewhat  more  inflated  and  with  the  epidermis 
green  rather  than  brown,  and  in  having  the  shell  usually  somewhat 
thinner.  Some  of  the  shells  near  the  outlet  of  Lost  Lake  are  exceed- 
ingly thin,  some  of  them  so  much  so  that  ordinary  print  can  easily  be 
read  through  them;  they  are  so  fragile  that  it  is  almost  impossible  to 
keep  them. 

Of  the  collection  from  Lake  Maxinkuckee,  mostly  from  Long  Point, 
26  examples  were  carefully  compared.  The  smallest  measured  68  nmi. 
long,  38  mm.  high  and  24.6  mm.  in  diameter,  and  the  largest  93.5  mm. 
long,  50  mm.  high  and  37  mm.  in  diameter.  Among  variant  forms  was 
one  female,  gravid  when  collected,  which  was  unusually  elongate,  its 
measurements  being  86  mm.  long,  43.5  mm.  high  and  32.5  mm.  in 
diameter.  In  outline  this  shell  closely  resembled  Anodontoides  feiiis- 
sadanus  subcylindraceus. 

Some  of  the  larger  specimens  are  rather  humped  and  arcuate,  the 
ventral  margin  of  one  being  somewhat  concave.  This  is  a  variation 
which  is  quite  likely  to  occur  in  old  shells  of  any  species. 

Although  gravid  Anodontas  were  found  rather  frequently  durinjr 
the  late  autumn,  no  infected  fishes  were  seen,  and  no  young  were  found. 

The  Anodontas  of  the  lake  are  fairly  free  from  parasites,  a  few 
A  tax  and  Cotylaspis  and  occasionally  a  few  distomids  on  the  mantle 
next  to  the  umbonal  cavity  being  the  only  ones  present  in  any  numbers. 
In  some  of  the  other  lakes  the  Anodontas  were  very  badly  infested;  a 
colony  found  in  one  of  the  Twin  Lakes  being  infested  to  a  remarkable 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


269 

degree  by  a  distomid  which  formed  cysts  in  the  margin  of  the  mantle. 

Food  and  Parasites  of  Various  Examples. — The  following  is  the 
result  of  the  examination  of  various  examples  of  Anodontas:  Sample 
No.  10.  Vial  containing  intestinal  contents  of  Anodonta  grandis  foot- 
iana,  Lost  Lake,  September  7,  1908.  The  vial  contains  a  considerable 
amount  of  material  (in  formalin)  which  was  separated  into  black  fine 
mud  below  and  fine  flocculent  light  green  above.  Upper  portion— 
Microcystis  xruginosa,  most  common;  Peridinium  tabulatunif  some; 
Pediastrum  horyanum;  Melosira  crenulata,  a  few  filaments;  Ccelastrum 
microporum,  Botryococcus  brcLUnii  and  Scenedesmus.  Bottom  layer — 
Lyngbya  xstuarii,  Microsystis  xruginosa,  very  common;  Peridinium 
tabulatum,  Anurxa  cochlearis,  Cocconema  cymhiforme  and  Navicula. 

Sample  No.  11.  Food  of  Anodonta  grandis  footianaj  Lake  Maxin- 
kuckee,  near  Norris  Inlet,  August  20,  1908.  A  good  mass  of  flocculent 
fine  green  material;  no  mud. 

Microcystis  xruginosa,  most  common,  Melosira,  filament,  OscillatoriGf 
short  filament;  Anuraea  cochlearis,  several;  Cocconema  cymbi forme; 
Gomphosphxria  aponina;  Peridinium  tabulatum;  Cmlosphxrium  keut- 
zingianum,  Lyngbya  xstuarii,  Epithemia  argus,  Chydorus,  and  what 
appears  to  be  fragments  of  Ceratium  hirundinella. 

Sample  No.  12.  Anodonta  grandis  footiana,  near  Norris  Inlet,  Lake 
Maxinkuckee,  August  20,  1908;  a  small  mass  of  flocculent  blue  matenal. 

Microcystis  aeruginosa  most  abundant;  Lyngbya  xstuarii,  Melosira, 
Epithemia,  Anurxa  cochlearis,  Pediastrum  boryanum,  Cosmarium  inter- 
medium and  a  few  others,  Staurastrum  sp?,  Spirulina  and  Pediastrum 
duplex. 

Sample  No.  13.  Anodonta  grandis  footiana,  97  mm.  long.  Edge 
of  Lake  Maxinkuckee  east  of  Norris  Inlet,  August  29,  1908. 

Parasites;  ,9  Atax,  free  among  gills.  Mussel  gravid,  with  anterior 
end  of  shell  indented  and  with  some  brown  spots  on  the  nacre.  Food 
mass  fine  golden  brown,  abundant  in  quantity,  containing  Anurxa 
cochlearis,  many;  Microcystis  xruginosa,  most  abundant  element;  Ling^ 
by  a  xstuarii,  frequent;  Scenedesmus,  a  few;  Botryococcus  braunii,  fre- 
quent; Cocconema  cymbiforme;  Staurastrum,  Navicula;  Fragilaria; 
Chydorus,  a  few;  Ccelosphwrium  kuetzingianum;  the  diatoms  are  not 
abundant. 

Sample  No.  14.    Anodonta  grandis  footiana  apparently  old,  90  mm. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


270 

long,  near  Norris  Inlet,  Lake  Maxinkuckee,  Ind.,  August  29,  1908,  the 
shell  stained  somewhat  brown  inside,  with  one  steel-blue  stain  on  the 
right  valve  anteriorly. 

Parasites;  Atax  7,  large,  full  of  eggs,  one  small,  one  very  small, 
these  all  free  among  the  gills;  Cotylaspis  insignis  1,  in  axil  of  gill. 

Food  abundant;  Microcystis  aeruginosa,  abundant;  Lyngbya  sestu- 
arii,  common;  Pediastrum  duplex,  Botryococcus  braunii,  a  few;  Cos- 
marium;  Anurxa  cochlearis,  several;  Scenedesmus ;  Ankistrodesmus,  and 
many  diatoms,  among  which  are  Cocconeis  pediculus,  Melosira,  Gompho- 
nema,  Navicula,  Epithemia  turgida,  etc. 

Sample  No.  15.  Anodonta  grandis  footiana,  101  mm.  long,  Lake 
Maxinkuckee,  near  shore,  by  Norris  Inlet.     August  29,  1908. 

Parasities;  5  Atax,  free  in  gills,  some  full  of  eggs,  2  smaller  in  size, 
larval  Atax  (black)  scattered  in  gills.  Cotylaspis-  insignis,  2,  axil  of 
inner  gill. 

A  large  amount  of  food  material  in  intestines,  very  fine,  of  a 
yellowish  brown  color. 

Microsystis  ssruginosa,  Anurssa  cochlearis,  Lyngbya  xstuarii, 
Botryococcus  braunii  CoRlosphxrium  keutzingianum,  Cosmarium,  Navi- 
cula, an  elongate  form,  Cocconema  cymbiforme,  Pediastrum  duplex,  P. 
boryanum;  red  cysts  apparently  of  Peridinium. 

Sample  No.  16.  Anodonta  grandis  footiana,  90  mm.  long,  sandy 
bottom  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee  near  Norris  Inlet.  August  29,  1908. 
Mussel  gravid.  Parasites:  Atex,  3,  free  among  gills,  Atex  embryos 
scattered  through  gills. 

Food  material  scarce,  fine  golden  brown  in  mass,  consisting  of 
Microcystis  aeruginosa,  abundant;  CoBlospJiasrium  keutzingianum,  abun- 
dant; Lyngbya  sestuarii,  a  few  filaments;  Anursea  cochlearis  and 
another  rotifer;  Botryococcus  braunii;  Sorastrum,  Ccelastrum,  Scenedes- 
mus, Pediastrum  duplex,  Navicula,  several;  Melosira  tabulata,  Synedra, 
Epithemia  turgida,  Cocconema  cymbiforme;  and  other  small  diatoms 
rather  numerous.     Cosmarium,  a  few. 

Sample  No.  17.  Anodonta  grandis  footiana,  93  mm.  long,  sandy 
bottom  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee  near  Norris  Inlet,  Augrust  28,  1908.  Mus- 
sel gravid.  Parasites:  1  Atax,  free  among  gills.  Intestines  almost 
empty.  Microcystis  seruginosa,  one  of  most  abundant  elements;  Lyng- 
bya  xstuarii,     Cwlosphxrium     kuetzingianum,    Botryococcus     braunii; 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


271 

Cosmarium,  Pediastnim,  Cocconeis  pediculus,  Epithemia  turgida;  Nazn- 
cula  (1  actively  moving),  Gomphonema,  Melosira  tabulata,  Anurxa 
cochlearis,  Chydorus, 

Sample  No.  18.  Anodonta  grandis  footiana,  95  mm.  long.  Lake 
Maxinkuckee  near  Norris  Inlet,  August  29,  1908.  Mussel  gravid.  Para- 
sites: 6  Atax  free  among  gills,  one  a  minute  red  species.  Many  young 
Atax  embryos  in  inner  side  of  mantle,  not  in  gills. 

Food  material  golden  brown,  with  some  green  intermixed,  very  fine. 
Microcystis  xruginosa,  common;  Lyngbya  xstuarii,  a  few  filaments; 
Coelosphxrium  keutzingianum;  Botryococcus  braunii;  Pediastrum  du- 
plex; Anurxa  cochlearis  a  few;  Epithemia  turgida;  Navicula,  common; 
Cocconema  cymbiforme;  Cocconeis  pediculus,  several;  Cosmarium;  Chy- 
dorus, 

Sample  No.  19.  Anodonta  grandis  footiana,  Lake  Maxinkuckee, 
near  Winfield's.  Mussel  gravid.  Parasites:  Young  Atax  in  gills;  Dis- 
tomids  on  mantle  (a  slug  pearl  near  hinge.) 

Food:  Botryococcus  braunii;  Microcystis  aeruginosa;  Lyngbya  ses- 
tu^rii,  Coelosphxrium  kuetzingianum,  Pediastrum  duplex,  Navicula, 
Cocconema  cymbiforme. 

Sample  No.  20.  Anodonta  grandis  footiana.  Lost  Lake.  Young 
transparent  shell,  gravid,  length  77  mm.,  height  41  mm.,  diameter  30  mm., 
live  weight  1  oz.,  shell  1-4  oz.  Parasites,  several  Cotylaspis  insignis  in 
axil  of  gills,  food  chiefly  Microcystis  aeruginosa;  considerable  Botryococ- 
cus braunii. 

Sample  No.  21.  Anodonta  grandis  footiana,  Lost  Lake.  Parasites: 
1  young  Ata^  in  gill;  Cotylaspis  insignis  in  axil  of  gill.  Food  chiefly 
Microcystis  xruginosa,  a  little  Botryococcus  braunii,  Lyngbya  sestu- 
arii  and  Pediastrum  boryanum, 

6.     Strophitus  edentulus  (Say).     Squawfoot. 

Not  very  common  in  the  lake.  Occasional  shells  can  be  picked  up 
along  shore,  especially  between  Long  Point  and  Arlington,  and  along 
the  north  shore.  Living  examples  were  also  taken  in  small  numbers  from 
the  mussel  bed  at  the  mouth  of  Norris  Inlet,  and  at  Long  Point.  In  a 
collection  of  about  300  living  mussels  collected  at  the  latter  place  in  the 
autumn  of  1907,  only  three  were  of  this  species. 

As  found  in  the  various  rivers  of  the  country,  this  is  one  of  the 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


272 

most  variable  of  shells,  and  the  exact  limits  of  the  species  and  its 
various  forms  are  not  yet  well  worked  out.  The  lake  examples,  though 
differing  considerably  from  those  of  the  neighboring  rivers  and  from 
river  shells  in  general,  do  not  exhibit  a  very  large  range  of  variation. 
They  are  all  markedly  dwarfed,  the  average  length  being  about  2  1-2 
inches  or  63.5  mm.  All  have  a  well-developed  rounded  posterior  ridge. 
The  epidermis  is  deeply  stained,  that  of  the  exposed  portion  of  the 
shell  being  a  rich  yellowish  brown,  while  the  anterior  portion,  in  the 
living  shell  buried  in  the  soil  of  the  bottom,  is  a  deep  shining  brown 
black.  The  anterior  margin  is  not  nearly  so  heavy  and  produced  as  one 
frequently  finds  it  in  river  examples.  The  beaks  of  the  lake  shells  are 
not  so  angular  as  they  usually  are  in  river  shells,  and  the  high  wavy 
ridges  are  more  numerous  and  pronounced.  In  the  Maxinkuckee  shells, 
also,  a  number  of  fine  hair-like  lines  or  ridges,  much  like  growth  lines, 
extend  along  the  posterior  border  of  the  umbone,  parallel  with  the 
posterior  ridge  of  the  earlier  stages  of  the  shell. 

The  nacre  of  the  lake  shells  is  a  rich  rosy  salmon.  Unlike  the  salmon 
color  of  "Anodonta  sahnonea",  this  is  a  natural  color,  not  due  to  diseased 
conditions;  the  nacre  surface  is  very  smooth  and  the  color  extends  deeply 
into  the  shell.  In  some  cases  the  inner  nacreous  surface  appears  to  be  a 
secondary  thickening  of  the  shell,  laid  on  the  older  portions  like  an 
enamel.  Below  this  extra  nacreous  deposit  the  growth  lines  are  very 
distinct  on  the  inner  surface  of  the  shell.  The  rest  periods  are  distinct 
black  lines,  often  plainly  visible  through  the  translucent  shell  when 
held  up  to  the  light.  Rays  are  always  invisible  by  reflected  light  in 
the  lake  shells,  but  in  some  examples  they  were  visible  by  transmitted 
light.  The  animal  has  orange-colored  flesh.  The  few  living  examples 
examined  indicate  that  parasites  are  common;  one  contained  three  old 
Atax  ypsilophorus,  and  several  young. 

One  gravid  example  was  found,  October  17,  1907.  The  youngest 
example  found  was  42  mm.  long  and  exhibited  four  rest  periods. 

7.     Lampsilis  glans  (Lea). 

Fairly  common  in  the  main  lake;  dead  shells  are  often  found  along 
shore,  and  occasionally  the  living  mussels  are  to  be  seen  in  shallow  water 
at  the  various  mussel  beds  at  the  lake.  It  is  quite  abundant  along  the 
edges  of  the  thoroughfare  joining  the  lakes,  and  is  common  in  Lost  Lake. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


273 

The  examples  found  in  the  thoroughfare  and  Lost  Lake  were  of  unusu- 
ally large  size;  this  is  one  of  the  few  species  of  mussels  which  are 
as  large  or  larger  in  the  lake  than  in  the  neighboring  rivers.  L.  glavs 
appears  to  prefer  shallow  water  along  shore.  A  good  number  of  shells 
recently  cleaned  out  by  muskrats  was  found  near  the  water's  edge  at 
Long  Point  in  the  late  autumn  of  1913. 

In  the  Tippecanoe  River  at  Delong  this  was  a  very  abundant  species 
in  the  greasy  whitish  blue  clay  along  shore,  and  was  here  one  of  the 
favorite  morsels  of  the  muskrat.  With  the  exception  of  Micromya 
fabalis  this  is  the  smallest  species  of  mussel  found  in  the  lake.  It  can 
be  easily  recognized  by  its  black  epidermis,  small  size  and  purple  nacre. 

8.     Lampsilis  iris  (Lea). 

Rather  common  in  the  lake  in  shallow  water  near  shore,  found 
scattered  among  the  other  species  in  the  various  shell-beds.  There  is  a 
good  colony  in  the  Lost  Lake  bed,  and  it  is  fairly  abundant  off  the 
Depot  grounds,  by  Kruetzberger's  pier,  at  Long  Point,  and  at  the  bed 
near  the  mouth  of  Norris  Inlet. 

The  lake  shells  differ  markedly  from  those  of  the  neighboring  rivers 
so  much  that  it  is  easy  to  separate  the  lake  and  river  shells  at  a  glance. 
The  lake  shells  are  considerably  more  elongate,  and  the  epidermis  's 
stained  a  deep  brown,  mostly  concealing  the  rays;  when  these  are  visible 
they  are  brownish  rather  than  green,  and  the  umbones  are  rather  eroded. 
The  shells,  indeed,  resemble  somewhat  the  males  of  L.  subrostrata,  with 
which  they  are  associated.  The  lake  shells  exhibit  a  tendency  to  have 
their  posterior  margin  somewhat  broader  than  the  river  shells,  and  the 
shells  are  flatter  at  the  posterior  tip,  becoming  somewhat  produced. 
The  river  shells  are  more  solid  and  heavy. 

Lampsilis  iris  is  one  of  the  few  species  of  mussels  which  does  not 
show  a  marked  decrease  of  size  in  the  lake;  indeed,  some  of  the  larger 
lake  examples  run  actually  larger  than  those  from  the  neighboring 
rivers.  Some  of  the  largest  lake  shells  examined  have  the  following 
dimensions : 

No.  Length  mm.  Alt.  mm.  Diam.  mm. 

1  69.6  37.3  21.0 

2  65.9  34.9  21.0 

3  68.0  34.6  22.0 

18—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Alt.  mm. 

Diam.  mm 

35.8 

22.7 

36.8 

20.9 

33.8 

21.5 

274 

No.  Length  mm. 

4  64.9 

5  67.0 

6  67.7 

No  young  shells  were  found,  even  the  smallest  appear  rather  old. 
The  smallest  three  measure: 

Length  mm.  Alt.  mm.  Diam.  mm. 

41.4  21.2  12.5 

38.9  21.5  12.5 

37.0  20.0  12.3 

For  comparison  with  the  lake  shells,  the  dimensions  are  given  of  the 
largest  two  shells  found  in  Yellow  River: 

No.  Length  mm.  Alt.  mm.  Diam.  mm. 

1  67.0  34.5  22.9 

2  64.0  33.5  21.0 

Only  one  gravid  example  was  found;  this  was  obtained  at  Lost  Lake 
bed  September  7,  1908. 

Of  all  the  species  of  mussels  in  the  lake,  L,  iris  has  the  best  con- 
nection, through  scattered  individuals  along  the  Outlet,  with  the  shells 
of  the  Tippecanoe  River,  a  few  shells  having  been  found  almost  through 
the  whole  length  of  the  Outlet.  The  Outlet  shells,  like  those  of  the 
rivers,  are  brightly  rayed.  The  species  is  abundant  in  the  Tippecanoe 
River  at  Delong.  A  number  of  examples  were  noted  in  spawning  condi- 
tion there  in  late  August  and  early  September  in  1908.  Observations 
in  the  Maumee  River  indicate  that  this  species,  L.  parva  and  L.  multi- 
radiata,  do  not  have  exactly  the  same  breeding  season  as  many  other 
species  of  Lampsilis  (luteola,  recta,  ligameniina,  etc.),  but  are  some- 
times fertilized  in  July,  spawning  in  August  and  September.  Being 
small  and  an  early  developing  species,  it  is  probable  that  they  have 
somewhat  different  habits;  indeed,  it  is  possible  that  they  have  more 
breeding  seasons  per  year  than  the  other  species. 

The  Tippecanoe  mussels  of  this  species  were  a  favorite  food  of  the 
muskrat,  and  were  killed  in  great  numbers  every  autumn,  the  dead 
shells  being  thickly  strewn  along  the  bank,  or  piled  in  heaps  at  the 
bases  of  rocks  which  the  rodent  used  as  a  feeding  place. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


275 

Lampsilis  iris  has  a  well  marked  tendency  in  the  lakes  and  Outlet 
to  produce  pearls  and  baroques;  but  these  are  too  small  to  be  of  any 
value. 

9.     Lampsilis  subro strata  (Say). 

Lampsilis  suhrostrata  reaches  its  best  development  along  the  muddy 
shores  of  lagoons,  not  being  perfectly  at  home  either  in  swiftly  flowing 
streams  or  in  perfectly  quiet  lakes,  although  occasional  examples  may  be 
found  in  either.  It  is  considerably  more  abundant  in  Lake  Tippecanoe 
and  Upper  Fish  Lake  than  in  any  other  Indiana  lakes  examined.  Along 
the  edges  of  the  Mississippi  sloughs  it  is  fairly  common  and  reaches  a 
large  size,  often  distinguished  with  difficulty  from  Lampsilis  fallaciosa 
except  for  the  thinness  of  the  shell  and  the  black  epidermis.  It  is  rare 
in  Lake  Maxinkuckee,  only  a  few  examples  having  been  obtained  from 
the  mussel  bed  near  Norris  Inlet.  It  is  much  more  common  in  Lost  Lake 
in  the  large  bed  along  shore  south  of  the  Bardsley  cottage.  Mr.  Blatchley, 
in  a  short  report  on  the  mollusks  of  the  lake  (25th  annual  report. 
Department  of  Geology  and  Natural  Resources  of  Indiana,  1900,  p.  250), 
says  of  this  species :  "Not  common  in  the  main  lake ;  more  so  in  the  muck 
and  mud  along  the  margins  of  Lost  Lake,  where  a  well-marked  variety, 
with  a  larger  and  broader  beak,  was  taken.  A  specimen  of  this  was 
sent,  among  others,  to  Mr.  Chas.  T.  Simpson,  of  the  Smithsonian  Insti- 
tution, for  verification.  In  his  reply  he  says:  *The  variety  of  subro- 
strattLs  which  you  send  is,  so  far  as  I  know,  confined  to  northern  Indiana. 
It  is  quite  remarkable,  and  would  seem  to  be  almost  a  distinct  species. 
I  have  seen  quite  a  number  of  specimens  of  it,  and  at  first  thought  it 
a  variety  of  U,  nasutus,  but  there  seem  to  be  intermediate  forms  con- 
necting it  with  U,  subrostratus.'  " 

With  the  exception  of  the  differences  due  to  sex,  all  the  Maxin- 
kuckee and  Lost  Lake  shells  are  very  uniform  in  appearance,  much  more 
so  than  L.  Ititeola,  and  are  hardly  distinguishable  from  examples  from 
Lake  Tippecanoe,  Upper  Fish  Lake,  or  a  specimen  collected  in  the  Wa- 
bash River  at  Terre  Haute  by  Dr.  J.  T.  Scovell.  They  are  dark  brown 
in  color  with  very  faint  rays.  The  species  appears  to  be  rare  in  the 
Tippecanoe  River  at  Delong.  One  example  wa§  obtained  there,  which 
is  somewhat  shorter  and  stouter  than  those  of  the  lake,  and  not  so  badly 
stained;  it  shows  faint  rays  posteriorly.    The  Lost  Lake  shells  are  some- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


276 

what  larger  than  those  found  at  the  other  lakes.  No  young  were  found, 
the  smallest  shell  obtained  being  a  half-grown  example.  One  gravid 
specimen  was  found  at  Lost  Lake  September  7,  1908.  The  marsupium 
closely  resembles  that  of  L.  iris,  being  a  kidney  shaped  mass  filling  the 
hinder  portion  of  the  outer  gill,  this  mass  marked  into  segments  by 
rather  deep  radiating  furrows.  The  very  edge  of  the  marsupium  is 
white,  beyond  the  dusky  submarginal  area,  the  white  making  a  chain- 
like area  at  the  edge  of  the  gill.  Like  L.  iris,  this  species  has  a  tendency 
to  form  pearls,  but  they  are  too  small  to  be  of  any  value. 

Food  of  individuals:  The  following  is  the  result  of  the  examina- 
tion of  the  contents  of  the  intestines  of  L.  subrostrata  from  Lost  Lake 
at  various  dates. 

Sample  22.  August  20,  1908.  A  small  amount  of  flocculent  bluish- 
gray  material.  Peridvnium  tahulatum,  abundant;  Microcystis  serugi- 
nosa,  abundant;  Anurxa  cochlearis;  Pediastrum  boryanum;  Diatoms — 
Synedra;  Cocconema  cymbiforme. 

Sample  23.  August  20,  1908.  A  very  small  amount  of  flocculent 
grayish  material.  Peridinium  tabulatum,  a  few;  Microcystis  xniginosa, 
a  little;  Pediastrum  boryanum;  Cosmarium;  Tetraedron  minimum; 
Scenedesmus;  Euglyphia  alveolata;  Peridinium,  a  smaU,  sharp-spined 
form.  Diatoms  make  up  the  grreater  part,  including  Cocconema  cymbi- 
forme;  Naincula;  Fragilaria;  Coscinodiscu^ ;  and  Epithemia. 

Sample  24.  September  7.  A  large  amount  of  material,  black  mud 
below,  greenish  flocculent  material  above.  The  upper  portion  contains 
chiefly  Botryococcus  braunii  and  Microcystis  aeruginosa.  Bottom  por- 
tion— Microcystis  seruginosa,  common;  Botryococcus  braunii;  Peridinium 
tabulatum;  Peridinium,  a  small-spined  species;  Scenedesmus,  frequent; 
Statirastrum;  Pediastrum  duplex;  Coelastrum,  a  few;  Anursea  coch- 
learis; Tetraedron;  Docidium;  Cfxlosphserium  kuetzingianum;  Sponge 
spicule;  Lyngbya  xstuarii;  Diatoms,  Synedra;  Xavictila;  Gomphonema; 
etc. 

10.     Lampsilis  luteola  (Lamarck).     Fat  Mucket. 

Lampsilis  luteola  is  the  most  widely  distributed  of  the  American 
Vnionidse,  its  range  extending  over  nearly  all  of  North  America  east 
of  the  Rocky  Mountains.  It  lives  and  thrives  under  a  great  variety  of 
conditions,  being  frequent  in  both  lakes  and  rivers. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


277 

In  Lake  Maxinkuckee  this  is  the  most  common  mussel,  being  found 
almost  everywhere  in  water  from  2  to  5  or  6  feet  deep  where  the  bot- 
tom is  suitable.  It  prefers  a  rather  solid  bottom  with  some  admix- 
ture of  sand  or  gravel,  but  occurs  also  even  where  the  bottom  is  of 
a  rather  firm  peaty  nature  as  in  some  places  in  Outlet  Bay.  It  is, 
however,  rather  scarce  and  widely  scattered  in  such  localities.  The  best 
beds  are  found  at  Long  Point,  at  Farrar's,  in  front  of  McDonald's,  by 
the  old  Kruetzberger  pier,  and  in  Aubeenaubee  Bay  off  from  the 
Military  Academy.  In  Lost  Lake  it  was  abundant  in  the  large  mussel 
bed  below  the  Bardsley  cottage,  and  a  few  shells  were  found  in  the 
north  end  of  the  lake. 

The  Lake  Maxinkuckee  shells  are  smaller  and  thinner  than  those 
of  the  rivers;  they  closely  resemble  those  of  most  of  the  neighboring 
lakes  with  which  they  were  compared,  such  as  Twin  Lakes,  Pretty  Lake, 
Bass  Lake,  etc.  The  L.  luteola  of  Upper  Fish  Lake  are  much  larger 
and  more  like  river  shells.  Compared  with  specimens  of  more  remote 
lakes,  those  of  Lake  Erie  are  much  smaller,  more  solid  and  not  stained, 
the  rays  being  quite  distinct.  The  L.  luteola  of  Lake  Pokegama,  Minn, 
are  unlike  any  of  those  above  cited,  being  large,  thick  and  heavy,  fur- 
nishing excellent  button  material. 

Lampsilis  luteola  is  represented  in  Lake  Maxinkuckee  and  Lost  Lake 
by  two  forms;  although  these  forms  are  well  connected  by  intergrades 
the  extremes  are  pretty  markedly  distinct. 

The  colony  in  Lost  Lake  is  composed  of  compressed,  elongate  shells, 
almost  as  large  as  those  found  in  rivers,  but  considerably  thinner.  It  is 
in  the  females  of  this  group,  and  only  in  part  of  them,  that  the  greatest 
variation  occurs.  The  males  are  not  much  unlike  the  ordinary  well- 
known  form  of  the  neighboring  rivers.  The  most  strongly  aberrant 
females  are  markedly  compressed,  and  flare  out  broadly  in  the  post- 
basal  region.  The  umbones  are  far  forward  and  they  remind  one  some- 
what in  contour  of  the  marine  species,  Modiola  plicatula.  Some  of  them 
closely  resemble  Lampsilis  radiata  of  the  Atlantic  drainage.  The  Lost 
Lake  mussels  of  this  species  are  stained  a  peculiar  attractive  ash-gray 
which  does  not  greatly  obscure  the  rays.  They  are  not  so  heavily  en- 
crusted with  marl  as  are  those  in  the  Lake  Maxinkuckee  beds.  Typical 
Lake  Maxinkuckee  specimens  are  dwarfed  and  stained  a  deep  brown, 
which  obscures  the  rays.     Most  of  them  are  thickly-coated  posteriorly 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


278 

with  incrustations  of  marl.  It  is  principally  this  species  which  has  asso- 
ciated with  it  the  little  water-beetle,  Stenelmis  sulcatus  Blatchley.  At 
Long  Point,  where  L.  luteola  is  the  most  common  mussel,  examples  of  the 
peculiar  Lost  Lake  form  are  rather  frequent.  In  comparing  sets  of 
shells  from  the  various  mussel  beds  of  the  lake,  Long  Point,  Farrar's 
and  the  Norris  Inlet  beds,  it  was  noted  that  the  mussels  of  each  bed, 
as  one  approached  the  upper  portions  of  the  lake,  averaged  somewhat 
smaller. 

As  regards  food,  movements,  reproduction,  etc.,  L.  luteola  does  not 
differ  greatly  from  the  other  mussels  of  the  lake  with  the  exception  that 
it  appears  to  be  considerably  the  most  active  species  in  the  lake.  A 
few  more  were  observed  moving  about  during  the  winter  of  1900-1901. 
The  deep  water  individuals  rarely  move  about  at  all.  In  the  autumn  of 
1913  the  migration  of  those  near  shore  into  deep  water  was  strikingly 
shown  in  a  series  of  numerous  furrows,  with  a  mussel  at  the  deep 
water  end  and  extending  from  shore  outward  near  Long  Point. 

As  with  the  other  mussels  of  the  Lake,  reproduction  is  a  rather 
inconspicuous  phenomenon,  not  attended  with  the  marked  display  com- 
mon in  the  larger  river  examples.  Of  252  examples  collected  at  Long 
Point,  October  17,  1907,  25  contained  glochidia  in  the  gills,  some  being 
very  full  and  much  distended.  One  was  found  gravid  May  24,  1901, 
and  on  August  22,  1906,  some  in  Lost  Lake  appeared  to  be  about  ready 
to  spawn. 

The  young  of  this  species  were  found  rather  frequently  in  the  lake, 
much  more  frequently,  indeed,  than  any  other  kind.  The  smallest  ex- 
amples were  obtained  while  seiving  sand  for  Sphieriums  at  Long  Point 
These  young  mussels  live  buried  in  the  fine  sand  near  shore.  Specimens 
up  to  about  a  half-inch  long  are  very  crinkly,  being  covered  with  narrow 
elevated  parallel  ridges,  generally  five  in  number,  each  consisting  of  two 
open  loops  placed  end  to  end,  the  sides  of  the  loops  being  rou^rhly 
parallel  with  the  ventral  margin  of  the  shell;  the  ends  where  they  join 
form  a  sharp  curve  upward  toward  the  umbone.  These  double  loops  are 
followed  by  a  number  of  broken  irregular  ridges.  The  markings  just 
described  persist  on  the  umbones  of  the  older  shells  until  eroded  away. 
The  half  grown  shells  are  beautifully  rayed  with  green  on  a  whitish 
background.  As  the  shells  grow  older  they  become  gradually  stained 
a  deep  uniform  brown,  obscuring  the  rays. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


279 

Most  of  the  mussels  of  the  lake  are  slightly  parasitized,  none  abun- 
dantly; they  contain  a  few  examples  of  a  small  reddish  Atax,  and  a  few 
Cotylaspis  insignis,  A  small  round  worm,  somewhat  like  a  vinegar 
eel,  was  found  very  active  in  the  intestine  of  one  specimen;  it  was 
probably  parasitic. 

Small  irregular  pearls  or  slugs  are  produced  but  they  are  of  no 
value.  In  some  rivers  this  species  produces  an  abundance  of  small 
round  pearls.  Some  of  the  pearl-bearing  river  specimens  were  planted 
in  the  lake  in  1912  to  see  if  they  would  infect  the  lake  shells. 

The  Lampsilis  hUeola  of  the  rivers  is  a  fair  button  shell,  but  the 
Lake  Maxinkuckee  shells  are  too  small  and  thin  to  have  much  value. 
It  is  a  remarkable  fact  that  in  Lake  Pokegama,  Minn.,  L.  luteola  grows 
abundantly  in  shallow  bottom  among  the  weeds,  and  there  produces  a 
handsome  thick  heavy  shell,  one,  indeed,  concerning  which  the  pearl 
button  manufacturers  are  very  enthusiastic,  so  much  so  that  the  shells 
at  that  distant  point  from  the  market  brought  $22.00  per  ton;  in  the 
summer  of  1912,  two  carloads  of  these  shells  were  shipped  to  Europe. 

Just  why  the  Lake  Maxinkuckee  shells  are  not  like  the  excellent  ones 
of  Lake  Pokegama  remains  as  yet  unanswered,  but  seems  to  be  largely 
a  question  of  breed.  It  would  certainly  be  worth  while  to  introduce  the 
Lake  Pokeg^ama  breed  into  Lake  Maxinkuckee. 

Following  is  the  results  of  the  examination  of  various  individuals 
of  the  Maxinkuckee  and  Lost  Lake  shells: 

Sample  25.  L.  luteola.  Lost  Lake,  September  7,  1908.  Mussel 
gravid.  Leng^th  100  nrni.,  altitude  62  mm.;  diameter  33  mm.  Live 
weight  2^  oz.;  shell  1%  oz.  Parasites:  7  free  Atax  among  gills,  young 
Atax  in  gills  and  numerous  Atax  eggs  on  interior  surface  of  mantle. 
Food  chiefly  Microcystis  xruginosa;  Botryococcus  braunii,  Lyngbya 
sesturaii;  Melosira;  Navicula. 

Sample  26.  L.  luteola.  Lost  Lake,  September  7,  1908:  Mussel 
gravid:  Length  95  mm.,  alt.  60  mm.,  diam.  38  mm.  Live  weight  3% 
oz.;  shell  1%  oz.  Parasites:  .7  free  Atax  in  .gills,  and  Atax  eggs  in 
the  mantle.  Food,  chiefly  Microcystis  asruginosa;  also  Botryococcus 
braunii;  Navicula;  Lyngbya  sestuarii;  and  Anursea  cochlearis. 

Sample  27.  L.  luteola.  Lost  Lake  by  Bardsley's  September  7,  1908. 
Live  weight  3U  oz.;  shell  1^^  oz.,  length  97  mm.,  alt.  54  mm.,  diam.  33 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


280 

mm.  Parasites:  7  free  Atax  among  gills.  Many  small  red  eggs  of 
Atax  on  inner  surface  of  mantle.  Food  chiefly  Microcystis  xruginosa; 
Botryococcus  braunii;  and  Navicula, 

Sample  28.  Lampsilis  luteola.  Lost  Lake,  September  7,  1908.  Live 
weight  3%  oz.;  length  104  mm.,  alt.  54  mm.,  diameter  33  mm.  Para- 
sites: Atax  6,  free  among  gills,  eggs  of  Atax  on  inner  side  of  mantle, 
young  in  pits  on  side  of  foot.  Food,  Microcystis  ssruginosa,  most  com- 
mon; Lyngbya  xstuarii;  Navicula;  Melosira;  Anurxa;  and  Cocconenuju 

Intestinal  contents  of  two  examples  of  L.  luteola  obtained  in  Lake 
Maxinkuckee  August  27,  1908,  near  the  shore  just  north  of  the  ice 
office  gave  the  following  results: 

Sample  29.  Microcystis  oeruginosa,  main  mass;  Anurxa  cochlearis, 
a  few;  Botryococcus  brauniif  rather  common;  Cocconema  cymbiforme^ 
one;  Lyngbya  xstuariif  1  filament;  Navicula,  2  examples;  Synedra,  a 
few. 

Sample  30.  Microcystis  xruginosa,  main  mass;  Botryococcus 
braunii,  very  common;  Lyngbya  sestuarii,  several  filaments;  Anurxa 
cochlearis,  a  few;  Synedra,  some;  Navicula,  one  example  very  lively; 
Cosmarium,  one;  Round  worm  like  vinegar  eel,  very  lively. 

Sample  31.  Lost  Lake,  1908.  A  good  mass  of  material,  blackish 
below,  flocculent  greenish  above.  Lyngbya  aestuarii,  a  few  filaments, 
Microcystis  xruginosa,  quite  abundant;  Anurxa  cochlearis;  sponge 
spicule;  Pediastrum  duplex;  Staurastrum;  Botryococcus  braunii;  Peri- 
dinium  tabulatum,  a  few;  Peridinium,  a  small  spiny  species  1;  Pedias- 
trum boryanum;  several  diatoms — Navicula;  Coscinodiscus ;  Melosira; 
Cocconema  cymbiforme ;  Microcystis,  is  the  most  abundant  element;  Peri- 
dinium is  rather  scarce. 

Sample  32.  Lake  Maxinkuckee,  August  27,  1908:  A  small  amount 
of  brownish  green  flocculent  material.  Anurxa  cochlearis,  quite  fre- 
quent; Lyngbya  xstuarii,  short  filament;  Peridinium  tabulatum,  a  few; 
Coelastrum  microponim;  Ccelosphxrium  kuetzingianum;  Pediastrum 
boryanum;  Scenedesmus,  very  few;  Chydorus,  fragment.  Diatoms,  Epi- 
themia  turgida;  Navicula;  Cocconema  cymbiforme;  Gomphonema;  Cos- 
cinodiscus, 

Sample  33.  Lake  Maxinkuckee,  August  27,  1908 :  A  fair  amount  of 
brownish   green   material,  muddy  below,  flocculent   green   above.     The 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


281 

grreen  top  material  consisting  chiefly  of  Microcystis  xruginosa;  with 
some  Anurxa  cochlearis;  Lyngbya  sestuariiy  Microsystis  xruginosa; 
Bulbochaste,  bristle;  Ccelastrum  microporum;  Merismopoedia  glauca; 
Pediastrum  boryanum;  Diatoms — Navicula,  Coscinodiscus;  etc. 

Measurements : — 

The  following  is  a  series  of  measurements  of  Lost  Lake  examples : 

Measurements  in  mm. 

Remarks. 
Fanshaped  female. 
Fanshaped  female  gravid. 
Fanshaped  female. 
Fanshaped  female. 
Fanshaped  female. 
Male. 
Male. 
Male. 
Male. 
Male. 
Most  of  these  shells, 
blistered  posteriorly. 
The  males  are  fairly  like  those  of  river  examples;  the  females  arc 
more  fan-shaped.    Weight  of  the  10  shells,  15  oz.;  only  a  few  are  rayeJ 

11.     Lampsilis  ventricosa   (Barnes).     Pocket-book. 

Rather  common  at  the  Long  Point  mussel  bed;  a  few  found  in  the 
bed  by  Farrar's  and  a  few  in  Lost  Lake.  The  species  as  found  in  the 
lake  is  markedly  dwarfed  and  quite  different  in  appearance  from  the 
usual  river  form.  There  are  two  types  in  the  Long  Point  bed,  one  con- 
sisting of  females  and  having  the  post-basal  inflation  of  the  shell  char- 
acteristic of  that  sex,  not  exactly  as  in  the  river  form,  however,  but 
somewhat  more  restricted;  this  feature,  along  with  a  peculiar  stain  ct 
the  epidermis  which  conceals  the  normal  coloring  of  the  shell,  causes 
them  to  resemble  very  closely  a  short  female  L.  luteola.  The  other  type, 
an  oval  shell  without  the  post-basal  inflation,  was  at  first  taken  to 
represent  the  males,  but  some  of  them  were  found  to  contain  glochidia. 
These,  too,  bear  a  marked  resemblance  to  L.  luteola,  and  the  only  way 


No. 

Date, 

1908. 

Length. 

Alt. 

Diam. 

1189 

Aug. 

20. 

85. 

54. 

32. 

1260 

Sept. 

7. 

97.4 

55. 

31. 

1215 

Aug. 

20. 

87. 

46. 

35.6 

1224 

Aug. 

20. 

98. 

56. 

26. 

1245 

Aug. 

20. 

90. 

51. 

32.8 

1235 

Aug. 

20. 

98. 

48.9 

36.3 

1188 

Aug. 

20. 

102. 

53. 

36. 

1221 

Aug. 

20. 

100. 

51. 

37. 

1223 

Aug. 

20. 

96. 

51.4 

34.8 

1228 

Aug. 

20. 

102.3 

53.7 

33. 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


282 

to  distinguish  the  two  species,  as  they  occur  in  the  lake,  was  by  an 
examination  of  the  umbonal  sculpture.  This  in  ventricosa  consists  of  a 
a  few  coarse  parallel  ridges;  in  luteola  the  sculpture  is  of  numerous  fine 
wavy  lines. 

The  lake  L.  ventricosa  was  so  markedly  different  from  the  species 
as  usually  known  that  it  was  compared  with  a  large  series  of  both  lake 
and  river  forms.  Of  river  shells  only  a  few  from  the  central  part  of 
the  Maumee,  where  for  some  reason  the  shells  are  markedly  dwarfed, 
bore  any  close  resemblance  to  it.  None  was  found  in  any  of  the  neigh- 
boring lakes  with  which  to  compare  them.  In  some  of  the  small  lakes 
of  Michigan  where  Dr.  Robert  E.  Coker  had  collected  he  had  experienced 
a  similar  difficulty  in  distingfuishing  between  L.  ventricosa  and  L.  luteola 
and  had  sent  sets  of  critical  specimens  to  Mr.  Bryant  Walker  of  Detroit, 
Mich.,  who  identified  the  shells  with  a  few  coarse  straight  undulations 
on  the  beaks  as  Lampsilis  ventricosa  canadensis  and  the  others  as  L. 
luteola. 

The  Maxinkuckee  specimens  were  also  compared  with  L.  ventricosa 
from  Lake  Champlain,  and  were  found  to  be  much  like  them.  The 
Champlain  examples  which  were  free  from  staining  of  the  epidermis 
more  closely  resembled  in  color  the    ventricosa  of  the  rivers. 

The  specimens  of  L.  ventricosa  differed  considerably  in  the  different 
beds.  Lost  Lake  examples  are  usually  rather  small,  and  are  stained  a 
peculiar  ashy-gray.  Those  from  the  beds  near  Farrar's  are  mostly 
small  and  apparently  young  and  are  rather  well  rayed;  they  resemble 
river  forms  more  closely  than  any  others  in  the  lake. 

The  large  oval  L.  ventricosa  of  Long  Point  are  the  heaviest  shells 
of  the  lake.  A  peculiarity  of  several  of  these  shells  is  a  conspicuous 
rib-like  thickening  on  the  inside,  extending  from  near  the  umbonal  cavity 
postero-ventrally.  The  nacre  is  soft  satiny  in  luster,  and  not  very 
iridescent.  This  oval  form  of  ventricosa  found  at  Long  Point  furnishes 
the  only  shell  in  the  lake  that  could  be  used  to  any  advantage  in  the 
manufacture  of  buttons,  and  even  it  produces  rather  inferior  material. 
Some  of  these  shells  were  sent  away  to  a  button  factory  at  Davenport 
and  buttons  were  made  of  them.  The  following  is  a  set  of  measuremer.ts 
of  these  large  shells: 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


283 


No. 

Date,  1907. 

Lgth.  mm. 

Alt.  mm. 

Dia.  mm. 

Remarks. 

1 

Sept. 

.24. 

114. 

74.8 

53. 

Female  gravid. 

2 

Oct. 

30. 

107.6 

65.5 

54.8 

3 

Oct. 

2. 

105.2 

63.7 

52.5 

4 

Oct. 

30. 

92.5 

60.4 

53.7 

Female  gravid. 

5 

Oct 

30. 

103.7 

67.3 

49.3 

Dorsal  baroques. 

6 

Oct. 

17. 

98.6 

60.2 

55.5 

Arcuate,  baroque  found. 

7 

Oct. 

20. 

101.7 

63.6 

52.2 

8 

Oct. 

30. 

94.6 

58.4 

53.2 

Nacre  diseased  and 
blistered. 

9 

Oct. 

17. 

95.6 

55.7 

49. 

10 

Oct. 

17. 

91.5 

60.4 

49.5 

Although  the  reproductive  phase  of  L.  ventricosa  of  the  Lake  is 
much  less  conspicuous  than  in  the  river  mussels,  most  of  them  appar- 
ently succeed  in  reproducing  themselves.  Most  of  the  females  found 
later  in  autumn  have  more  or  less  numerous  glochidia  in  the  gills.  No 
infected  fishes  or  very  young  mussels  of  this  species  were  seen. 

The  most  common  parasite  is  Atax,  and  it  is  not  particularly 
abundant.  Of  6  examples  collected  near  Farrar's  July  24,  1909,  the  first 
contained  9  of  the  mites,  the  second  4,  the  third  15,  with  Atax  eggs  in 
mantle  and  body,  the  fourth  12  Atax  and  numerous  eggs  of  the  mite  on 
the  inner  surface  of  the  mantle,  the  fifth  3  Atax  with  eggs,  and  the 
sixth  7  Atax  with  eggs  and  egg  scars.  No  other  parasites  were  noted. 
No  pearls  were  found,  only  a  few  irregular  slugs. 

In  1906  some  of  the  immense  L.  ventricosa  of  Yellow  River  were 
planted  in  the  lake  near  shore  not  far  from  the  old  ice  office.  A  few 
died  shortly  after  planting  but  near  the  same  place  two  years  later 
some  of  the  mussels  were  found  alive  and  apparently  thriving.  Two  of 
the  large  females  were  killed  and  examined.  Although  this  was  at  a 
time  when  this  species  is  usually  gravid,  one  of  these  individuals  was 
sterile,  apparently  having  failed  to  become  impregnated.  The  influence 
of  its  residence  in  the  lake  was  marked  by  a  dark  stain  which  covered 
the  exposed  portion  of  the  shell.  The  other  had  a  few  eggs  in  the  gills, 
and  numerous  marginal  cysts  in  the  mantle.  About  10  Atax  among  the 
gills,  and  numerous  distomids  on  the  outside  surface  of  the  mantlo  in 
iht*  umbonal  cavity. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


284 

12.  Lampsilis  multiradiata  (Lea). 

Not  abundant  in  the  lake;  occasional  shells  are  found  along  .•shoi-ei 
and  now  and  then  they  are  encountered  in  the  piles  of  shells  where 
muskrats  have  been  feeding.  A  few  living  examples  were  found  in  the 
mussel  bed  near  the  mouth  of  Norris  Inlet  and  a  few  at  Long  Point  bed. 
In  all  hardly  a  dozen  living  examples  were  secured;  of  563  shells  taken 
from  a  pile  left  by  a  muskrat  at  Long  Point  in  1907,  only  one  was  of 
this  species.  This  mussel,  as  it  occurs  in  the  lake,  is  not  nearly  so 
attractive  as  river  specimens,  being  dwarfed,  and  so  deeply  stained  that 
the  rays  are  inconspicuous,  being  usually  black  or  dull  brown  instead 
of  green. 

This  species  was  found  in  unusual  abundance  in  the  Tippecanoe 
River  at  Belong,  and  a  considerable  number  was  observed  spawning  dur- 
ing the  autumn  of  1908.  While  spawning,  this  mussel  is  very  conspic- 
uous in  its  habits.  It  lies  either  on  its  back,  or  more  usually  with 
the  posterior  end  directly  upward,  and  the  showy  edges  of  the  mantle, 
which  are  of  a  yellowish  brown  color,  and  cross-barred  with  narrow 
lines  which  are  continuous  with  the  fine  rays  of  the  epidermis,  look  a 
good  deal  like  a  small  darter  lying  on  the  bottom.  Long  waving  pennant- 
like flaps,  with  showy  black  spots  at  the  base  of  each  are  developed, 
and  this  portion  of  the  mussel  is  made  still  more  conspicuous  by  reason 
of  periodic  violent  spasmodic  contractions. 

In  the  Tippecanoe  River  near  Belong  this  is  one  of  the  favorite 
foods  of  the  muskrat,  and  it  must  be  difficult  for  them  to  hold  their 
own  against  that  rodent. 

1 3 .  Micromya  fabalia  (  Lea ) . 

Rare;  previous  to  1913  only  one  shell  had  been  found;  this  was 
picked  up  on  the  north  shore  of  the  lake  in  1907.  In  1913  several 
shells,  recently  cleaned  out  by  some  animal,  probably  a  muskrat,  wei*e 
found  at  the  wagon  bridge.  This  species  is  fairly  common  in  Tippecanoe 
Lake  and  still  more  so  in  the  Tippecanoe  River  at  Belong,  where  it  was 
collected  in  shallow  water  near  shore  in  rather  stiff  blue  clay.  It  is 
the  smallest  of  our  Unionidse.  The  white  or  bluish  white  nacre  has 
an  exceedingly  brilliant  luster. 

Several  other  species  of  mussels  have  been  recorded  for  the  lake, 
among  them  Quadrula  lachrymosa  (Lea),  Margaritana  marginata  Say, 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


285 

Unto  pressus  Lea,  Anodonta  aubcylindracea  Lea,  Anodonta  imbecillis 
Say,  Unio  phaseolus  Hildreth,  Unto  circulus  Lea,  Unio  parvus  Barnes, 
and  Lampsilis  grdcilis  (Barnes).  We  have  seen  representatives  of  none 
of  these  species  from  the  lake,  and  while  some,  such  as  Anodonta  im- 
becillis* and  A,  subcylindra^ea  are  very  probably  present,  the  presence  of 
the  others  is  very  improbable. 


•  Since  the  above  was  written  a  singrle  specimen  of  Anodonta  imbecillis,  from   Lost 
Lake,  has  been  seen. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


287 


Further  Experiments  with  the  Mutant,  Scarlet,  from 
Drosophila  Repleta. 


HoBART  Cromwell. 

The  mutant,  scarlet,  from  Drosophila  repleta,  was  first  described 
by  Hyde  in  the  American  Naturalist,  1914,  Vol.  49,  p.  183.  This  new 
eye-color  was  found  to  be  a  recessive  Mendelian  unit,  giving  a  ratio  of  3 
to  1  in  the  Fi  generation.  In  order  to  familiarize  myself  with  Mendel- 
ism,  I  undertook  to  determine  whether  or  not  the  black-eyed  flies  of  the 
Fj  generation  were  in  the  ratio  of  one  homozygous  to  two  heterozygous 
as  the  Mendelian  formula  demands. 

The  following  tables  give  the  results  of  the  crosses  between  scarlet 
and  the  wild  stock.  All  the  F,  flies  had  black  eyes  like  those  of  the 
original  wild  parents.  These  were  then  inbred  in  mass  culture,  as  Is 
shown  in  Tables  I.  and  II. 


TABLE  I. 
F,  Flies  of  the  Croes,  Scarlet  Female  by  Wild  Male. 


CiTLTCTRK  Number. 

Wild  Type, 
Femafoe. 

Wild  T>T)e, 
Males. 

Scarlet, 
Females. 

Scarlet, 
Males. 

187 
425 
410 
211 
123 
190 
200 
115 

■  ■ '    ■ 

202 
418 
410 
200 
152 
175 
210 
115 

64 
123 
124 
67 
52 
64 
61 
43 

59 

128 

^■'  '.'.'.'.'.'.   '.'.'..'.'.'.'.    ■.'.'..'.'.'.'.'.   '.'.'.'.'.'.'.   '. 

90 
70 
38 
40 
58 
31 

Total 

1,861 

1,982 

598 

534 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


288 


TABLE  II. 
Ft  Flics  of  the  Cross,  Scarlet  Male  by  Wild  Female. 


CuLTURB  Number. 

Wild  Type, 
Females. 

Wild  Type. 
Males. 

Scarlet, 
Females. 

Scarlet. 
Males. 

I 

r:::::::::;;:::::::::::.:::;:::::;::::: 

4..                         

447 
714 
284 
445 
193 
215 
122 
562 
326 
228 
195 
149 
341 

456 
692 
292 
415 
171 
220 
110 
462 
304 
262 
178 
157 
302 

120 
186 
68 
108 
64 
75 
32 
155 
108 
105 
66 
51 
87 

146 
203 
92 
123 

5 

65 

6 

77 

7 

38 

8  .                             

142 

,?::••:: 

112 
69 

11 

12  .. 

63 
53 

13 

116 

Total 

4,221 

4.021 

1,225 

1,299 

In  the  Fi  generation  from  the  scarlet  female  (Table  I),  there  was 
a  total  of  3,843  wild  type  flies  and  1,132  scarlet,  which  is  approximately 
a  ratio  of  3  wild  type  to  1  scarlet.  In  the  F2  generation  from  the  scarlet 
male  (Table  II),  there  were  8,242  of  the  wild  type  and  2,524  of  the 
scarlet,  which  makes  a  ratio  of  3.22  wild  type  to  1  scarlet.  The  extracted 
scarlets  have  since  bred  true. 

Crosses  were  made  to  scarlet  with  the  Fa  wild  type  flies  from  both 
the  original  cross  and  its  reciprocal.  To  insure  virgin  flies  the  sexes 
were  separated  every  twelve  hours.  These  back-crosses  were  made  in 
pairs  to  determine  how  many  of  the  flies  of  this  generation  were  homo- 
zygous and  how  many  were  heterozygous.  If  the  scarlet  eye-color  is  a 
simple  recessive  unit,  all  the  homozygous  blacks  mated  to  scarlet  should 
give  only  wild  type  offspring,  while  the  heterozygous  blacks  mated  to 
scarlet  should  give  equal  numbers  of  blacks  and  scarlets.  The  results 
of  these  crosses  are  shown  in  Tables  III  to  VI. 

Table  III  gives  the  results  of  back-crossing  to  scarlet  the  F2  female 
wild  type  flies  from  the  original  parents,  scarlet  female  by  wild  male. 
This  table  shows  that  82  such  matings  were  made.  Of  these  82  females, 
27  proved  to  be  homozygous  and  55  heterozygous,  a  ratio  of  two  to  one. 
Table  IV,  showing  the  reciprocal  cross  of  Table  III,  gives  18  homozygous 
and  59  heterozygous.  Table  V  gives  the  results  obtained  by  back-cross- 
ing to  scarlet  the  F2  wild  type  female  from  the  original  parent  cross 
scarlet  male  by  wild  female.     Of  these  females,  25  proved  to  be  homo- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


289 

zygous  and  39  heterozygous.  Table  VI,  the  reciprocal  cross  of  Table  V, 
shows  a  result  of  14  homozygous  and  16  heterozygous  males. 

A  sum  total  of  all  the  results  of  Tables  1 1 1- VI  gives  84  homozygous 
Fa  flies  and  169  heterozygous,  making  a  ratio  of  one  to  two,  which  agrees 
with  the  calculated  ratio. 

I  am  indebted  to  Dr.  R.  R.  Hyde  for  material  and  helpful  suggestions. 

TABLE  III. 
Pi.     Scarlet  Female  by  Wild  Male.    Reaults  of  Crossing  Wild  Type  Fi  Female  Flies  to  Scarlet  Malc«. 


Culture  Number. 

Wild  Type. 
Females. 

Wild  Type. 
Mal«. 

Scarlet. 

Females. 

Scarlet, 
Males. 

1 

2 

8 
17 
17 
24 
21 
17 
31 
31 
43 

"  -83  

102 
10 
28 
27 
52 
19 
48 
23 
78 
18 
14 
15 

37+ 
25 
62 
37 
46 
61 
7 
30 
44 
24 
40 
38 
78 
30 
.58 
34 
26 
39 
78-f 
20 
44+ 
23+ 
23+ 
38+ 
24  + 
75+ 
19 
10+ 

9 

8 
15 
31 
17 

8 
22 
22 
19 

82 
04 

6 
14 
36 
38 

9 

33 
21 
76 
15 
16 
17 

37+ 
22 
63 
30 
48 
69 
15 
35 
40 
16 
49 
38 
79 
22 
35 
32 
31 
33 
78  + 
18 

44  + 
23+ 
23+ 
38+ 
24+ 
75+ 
19 
10+ 

6 

9 

3 

13 

19 

fc25 

1        15 
16 
17 

4 

5 

6  .               

13 

28 
22 

30 

8 

9 

lot 

14 
41' 

11    

12 

13 

14 

15 

16                             .    . 

12 
35 
37 
15 
30 
19 

20 
40 
30 

17 

18     

19 

20 

8 

35 
26 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

13 
16 

8 

28+ 
16 

18 

11 

15 

28+ 

11 

27                      

2S 

29                  

.30 

31                    

32 

33 

34 

35     

36 

18 
14 
32 
43 

27 
22 
38 
31 

37 

38 

39 

40 •.    . 

41 

42                                                 

20 
30 
39 
24 
23 

29 
29 
39 
34 
27 

43       

44 

45 

46 

47 

48 

49 

16 

40+ 

11  + 

25+ 

35+ 

21+ 

10 

40+ 
11  + 
25+ 
35+ 
21  + 

50 

51 

19—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


290 


TABLE  III— Continued. 


Culture  Number. 

Wild  Type. 
Females. 

Wild  Type. 
Males. 

Scarlet. 
Females. 

Scarlet. 
Males. 

52 

464- 

46+ 

53 

37+ 

37+ 

27+ 

27+ 

54 

12 

10 

8 

7 

55 

25 

19 

27 

15 

56 

6 

5 

3 

8 

57 

16 

13 

13 

16 

68 

67 

55 

59 

17 

17 

17 

22 

60 

18 

20 

25 

21 

61 

23 

18 

16 

18 

62 

8 

4 

3 

8 

63 

33 

33 

64 

12 

13 

66 

5 

2 

2 

66 

4 

3 

2 

3 

67 

7 

5 

8 

5 

68 

19 

13 

60 

89 

90 

7n      .                                      .       . 

56 
73 

56 
65 

71 

72 

18+ 

26+ 

18+ 

28+ 

73 

42 

28 

28 

15 

74 

23 

31 

19 

21 

75....* 

24 

22 

17 

26 

76  .. 

63 
27 

63 
33 

77 

40 

25 

78 

29 

25 

27 

15 

79 

49 

57 

80 

29 

34 

23 

35 

81 

43 

39 

44 

35 

82  

20 

23 

24 

15 

Total:    27  homozygous  and  55  heterozygous, 
t  Heterozygous. 


TABLE  IV. 
Pi  Scarlet  Females  by  Wild  Males.     Kosults  of  Crossing  Wild  Type  Ft  Males  to  Scarlet  Females. 


Culture  Number. 

Wild  Type, 
Females. 

'''iU^' 

Scarlet, 
Females. 

Scarlet. 
Males. 

1 

2 

4 

2 

4 

2 

13 

4 

9 

4 

3 

17 

3 

12 

3 

4 

24 

25 

10 

6 

5 

14 

23 

17 

14 

6 • 

52 

41 

30 

50 

64 

64 

S   .'. 

52 

40 

18 

16 

9 

31 

36 

34 

29 

10 

47 

34 

39 

55 

11 

20 

27 

25 

20 

12 

56 

40 

53 

60 

13 

28 

34 

27 

26 

14 

22 

28 

18 

11 

15 

39 

58 

61 

51 

16 

63 

39 

100 

63 

17 

30 

25 

33 

34 

18 

40 

53 

19 

21 

19 

28 

30 

28 

22 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


291 


TABLE  IV— Continued. 


CuLTURB  Number. 

Wild  Type. 
Females. 

Wild  Type. 
Males. 

Scarlet. 
Females. 

Scarlet, 
Males. 

20 

86 
136 
24 

92 
149 
42 

21                                                                  ... 

22 

31 

22 

23 

94 
24 

20 

ia5 

37 
19 

24  . . .                

26 

20 

21 

26 

23 

31 

19 

24 

27 

24 

29 

32 

40 

2S 

36 

31 

40 

43 

29 

85 

123 

43 

46 

30 

46 

34 

41 

45 

31 

43 

38 

33 

34 

32 

54 
55 

40 
71 

39 
28 

55 

33 

39 

34  .    .    .           

77+ 

77+ 

35 

20 

15 

16 

21 

36 

45 

45 

41 

47 

37 

63 

23 

23 

26 

38 

55 

14 

20 

24 

39 

47 

57 

59 

37 

40 

131 

107 

41 

27 

32 

21 

26 

42 

52+ 

52+ 

.  55 

47 

43 

102 

95 

44 

20 

22 

35 

26 

45 

120 

91 

46 

22 

19 

21 

22 

47                                

120+ 
26 

120+ 

48 

22 

19 

24 

49 

93 

96 

50 

43 

37 

32 

32 

51 

62 

52 

52t 

53 

83 

71 

54 

53 

36 

55 

55 

55 

41 

43 

56 

24 

29 

22 

21 

57 

52+ 

52+ 

35+ 

35+ 

58 

46+ 

46+ 

50+ 

50+ 

5Q 

42 

43 

25 

22 

60 

41 

44 

30 

51 

61 

38+ 

38+ 

26+ 

26+ 

62 

6 

7 

63 

15 

9 

7 

64 

7 

19 

2 

14 

65 

9 

8 

8 

13 

66 

29 

30 

13 

14 

67 

21 

24 

23 

11 

68 

23 

12 

10 

5 

69 

39 

70t 

71 

26 

25 

20 

9 

72 

27 

29 

16 

14 

73 

40 

23 

74 

20 

15 

13 

10 

75 

9 

6 

5 

5 

76     

5 

18 

7 
23 

8 

14 

77 

Total:     18  proved  homozygous  and  59  heterozygous. 
tNoted  as  heterozygous,  but  no  count  made. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


292 


Pi  Scarlet  Male  by  Wild  Female. 


TABLE  V. 
Result  of  Crossing  Wild  Type  Fj  Male  to  Scarlet  Female. 


Total:    25  homozygous  and  39  heterozygous. 

t Noted  as  heterozygous,  but  no  accurate  count  made. 


Culture  Number. 

Wild  Type, 
Females. 

Wild  Type, 
Males. 

Scarlet. 
Females. 

Scarlet. 
Males. 

1      

50 
61 

52 
49 

2 

44 

49 

3     

74 
5 

63 
10 

4 

6 

5 

5 

27 

10 

20 

12 

6 

26 
86 
93 
21 
34 

28 
65 
83 
15 
30 

7.             

8 

9                      

10 

40 

43 

11 - 

19 

14 

16 

15 

12 

11 

10 

13 

12 

13 

45 

53 

33 

40 

14 

42 

48 

54 

54 

15 

46 

49 

37 

41 

16 

29 

21 

17 

14 

15 

18 

28+ 

28+ 

19 

51 

36 

34 

32 

20 

61 

47 

21 

2 

9 

12 

11 

22 

17 

19 

23 

17 

11      > 

24 

87 

88 

.    ... 

25 

22 

28 

20 

25 

26 

16 

10 

10 

11 

27 

37 

27 

31 

28 

28 

45 

36 

29 

31 

38 

3i 

27 

30 

38 

26 

26 

31 

31 

20 

16 

19 

21 

32 

78 

70 

33 

42 

51 

34 

34 

46 

39 

38 

35 

84 

72 

36t 

37 

20 

23 

13 

22 

38 

7 

8 

65+ 

65+ 

39 

46 

68 

38 

30 

40 

70 

74 

41 

31 

35 

32 

41 

42 

38 

23 

21 

12 

43 

10 

6 

5 

5 

44 

32 

41 

17 

28 

45 

3 

4 

6 

4 

46 

10 

12 

18 

6 

47 

30 

7 

19 

10 

48 

23 

20 

22 

18 

49 

7 

3 

6 

3 

50 

3 

2 

8 

4 

51 

.     60 

66 

52 

84+ 

84+ 

53 

24 

21 

54 

27 

25 

28 

20 

5,") 

21 

20 

21 

19 

56 

11 

12 

57 

14 

11 

10 

9 

58 

5 

1 

2 

5 

59 

14 

5 

6 

4 

60 

61 

25 

34 

15+ 

15+ 

16+ 

16+ 

62 

63 

64 

10 

8 

15 

13 

5 

2 

2 

3 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


293 


TABLE  VI. 
Pi  Scarlet  Male  by  Wild  Female.    Reeults  of  CrosBing  Wild  Type  Ff  Female  to  Scarlet  Male. 


CuLTURK  Number. 

'^jlilir- 

Wild  Type. 
Males. 

Scarlet. 
Females. 

Scarlet, 
Males. 

^ 

89 
49 
51 

111+ 
25 
45 
88 
10 
31 
71 
49 
54 
19 
71 
12 
50 
17 
53 
28 
50 
7 
19 
13 
29 
35 
56 
68 

89 
48 
50 

lll-f 
20 
40 
75 
17 
31 
79 
46 
56 
29 
75 
14 
41 
22 
50 
34 
39 
13 
19 
23 
30 
36 
52 
40 

2 

23 

36 

3 

4 

5 

15 
62 

14 

« 

7 

50 

8 

9 

17 

26 

10 

11 

12 

13 

21 
25 

24 

14 

15 

17 

16  . 

17 

18 

27 

19 

19 

20 

21 

37 
46 
4 
14 

29 
41 
6 

22..                  

21 

23 

24  

25 

23 

18 

26.  .              

20 

31 

27 

28t                  

29 

30 

30 
26 

31 
24 

21 
21 

26 
23 

Total:    14  homoiygous  and  16  heterozygous. 
fNoted  as  heteroiygoja,  but  no  accurate  count  made. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


295 


A  Seasonal  Study  of  the  Kidney  of  the  Five-Sfined 
Stickleback,  Encalia  Inconstans  Cayuga  Jordan. 


Walter  N.  Hess — DePauw  University. 


During  the  greater  part  of  the  year  the  male  kidney  is  an  excretory 
organ.  At  the  breeding  season,  however,  the  kidney  tubules,  for  about 
one-third  of  their  extent,  as  well  as  the  urinary  ducts,  the  bladder  and 
the  common  urinai-y  duct  become  modified  for  the  purpose  of  producing 
slime.  This  secretion,  which  is  used  by  the  fish  in  constructing  its  nest, 
is  produced  entirely  by  the  male  kidneys  and  only  at  the  breeding  season. 

In  the  process  of  slime  secretion,  the  behavior  of  the  nuclei  is  such 
that  they  evidently  pour  into  the  cell  bodies  certain  products,  in  the 
form  of  secretion  granules,  which  function  in  breaking  down  the  gran- 
ular cytoplasm  of  the  cells,  and  thus  form  the  secretion.  These  secre- 
tion granules  appear  to  be  produced  from  certain  products  of  the  kary- 
oplasm,  as  this  substance  gradually  diminishes  in  amount  during  this 
process.  Since  the  nuclei  become  irregular  and  flattened,  it  is  possible, 
but  not  probable,  that  the  nucleolus  functions  in  this  process. 

Only  one  kind  of  secretion  is  produced  for  constructing  the  nest. 
This  material  is  not  silk,  nor  is  it  composed  of  fine  fibrils,  but  appears 
as  a  fine  granular  slime-like  substance.  It  is  sometimes  exuded  in 
ribbon-like  masses,  but  it  probably  functions  more  as  an  adhesive  sub- 
stance, than  as  a  string,  in  binding  the  materials  of  the  nest  together. 

At  the  end  of  the  breeding  season  the  cytoplasmic  granules  arc 
regenerated.  They  begin  to  appear  on  all  sides  of  the  nucleus  at  the 
time  that  the  nucleus  begins  to  enlarge  and  become  spherical.  Since  they 
form  about  the  nucleus  and  wander  into  the  other  parts  of  the  cell  it 
would  seem  that  the  nucleus  must  be  the  active  agent  in  their  formation. 

During  the  resting  or  winter  stage  the  cells  which  form  the  slime 
during  the  spring  appear  much  like  the  cells  near  the  glomeruli  which 
secrete  urine,  except  that  their  nuclei  are  much  smaller  and  they  contain 
only  one  nucleolus.  At  this  season  the  nuclei  of  the  urinary  secreting 
cells  are  very  large,  often  occupying  at  least  half  of  the  cell  contents. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


296 

This  investigation  justifies  the  conclusion  that  the  whole  kidney  is 
not  transformed  periodically  into  a  silk  or  slime  producing  gland,  as  is 
maintained  by  certain  authors,  but  that  the  process  of  slime  secretion 
is  due  to  the  activity  of  the  epithelial  cells  of  various  ducts  and  tubes  of 
the  system  not  engaged  in  the  excretory  function.  It  is  comparable  to 
the  secretion  of  slime  by  the  genital  ducts  of  Amphibia  during  the 
breeding  season. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


297 
The  Erdmann  New  Culture  Medium  for  Protozoa. 


C.  A.  Behrens  and  H.  C.  Travelbee>— Purdue  University. 

It  is  a  well-known  fact  that  the  first  culture  in  vitro  of  a  pathogenic 
trypanosome  (Tryponosoma  Brucei)  was  obtained  by  Novy  and  Mac- 
Neal^  in  1903.  The  medium  used  was  a  meat  extract  agar  plus  two 
parts  of  defibrinated  rabbit's  blood.  Of  fifty  animals  tested  only  4,  or 
8%  i)ositive  cultures  resulted.  In  1905  Smedley*,  using  a  similar  medium, 
foimd  that  three  out  of  ten  attempts,  or  30%,  were  successful. 

Because  of  the  inconsistent  results  we  deemed  it  advisable  to  at- 
tempt an  improvement  of  the  medium.  The  first  attempts  along  these 
lines  were  in  1909*.  The  media  with  their  per  cent,  of  positive  growths 
are  as  follows: 

1  Novy  MacNeal  blood  agar 25% 

1 A  Novy  MacNeal  blood 0% 

2  Bean  and  pea  extract  blood  agar 53% 

2A  Bean  and  pea  extract  blood 0% 

3  Nicolle  blood  agar 48% 

3A  Nicolle  blood 0% 

4  Dialyzed  meat  extract  blood  agar 80% 

4A  Dialyzed  meat  extract  blood 0% 

5  Dialyzed  meat  extract  dilute  serum  agar 100% 

5A  Dialyzed  meat  extract  dilute  serum 0% 

6  Dialyzed  meat  extract  inactivated  serum  agar 100% 

6A  Dialyzed  meat  extract  inactivated  serum 0% 

7  Dialyzed  meat  extract  dilute  red  blood  cells  agar 38% 

7 A  Dialyzed  meat  extract  dilute  red  blood  cells 0% 

8  Dialyzed  meat  extract  Ascitic  fluid  agar 0% 

8A  Dialyzed  meat  extract  Ascitic  fluid 0% 

9  Veal  extract  blood  minus  white  blood  cells  agar 100% 

9A  Veal  extract  blood  minus  white  blood  cells 0% 

*Joar.  Amer.  Med.  Assn..  1903.  41.  p.  1266;  Jour.  Infect.  Dis..  1904.  1.  p.  1. 

»Jour.  Hyfir..  1905.  5,  p.  38. 

'Joar.  Infec.  Dis..  1914.  15.  1.  p.  4. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


298 

The  above  table  indicates  that  successful  cultures  ranging  from 
25  to  100  per  cent,  are  obtained  when  the  solid  type  of  medium  is  em- 
ployed and  that  in  every  case  where  the  liquid  medium  is  used  negative 
results  occurred.  In  the  successful  cultures  growth  always  resulted  in 
the  water  of  condensation  after  a  period  of  incubation  from  one  to  four 
weeks  at  a  temperature  ranging  from  25°  to  28°  C. 

We  therefore  naturally  were  very  much  interested  when  in  1914 
Rh.  Erdmann*  announced  a  new  liquid  culture  medium  for  Trypanosoma 
Brucei.  Erdmann  states  that  by  using  the  plasma  of  the  host  as  the 
medium  she  grew  Trypanosoma  Brucei  in  hanging-drop  cultures  and 
kept  them  in  normal  condition  for  an  indefinite  period.  The  technique 
employed  in  brief  was  as  follows:  The  plasma  was  obtained  by  the 
method  of  Harrison",  Burrows*,  and  Walton*.  **The  blood  from  the  in- 
fected rat  was  taken  and  put  into  a  small  drop  of  plasma  on  a  cover- 
glass  and  then  this  was  further  diluted  with  plasma  in  order  to  reduce 
the  number  of  blood  corpuscles  in  the  hanging-drop  which  was  taken 
from  this."  The  cover  glass  with  hanging-drop  was  either  placed  on  a 
depression  or  regular  slide  and  sealed.  Precautions  to  secure  aseptic 
conditions  were  taken. 

We  attempted  to  follow  the  technique  thus  outlined  as  nearly  as 
possible.  These  cultures  showed  no  signs  of  bacterial  contamination  at 
the  end  of  forty-five  days.  In  only  a  few  instances  were  actively  motile 
survivals  in  evidence  for  more  than  five  days  when  kept  at  ICC.  In 
preparations  incubated  at  20'*C,  or  above  no  survivals  were  observed 
after  forty-eight  hours. 

In  the  course  of  an  extensive  series  of  attempts  using  heterologous 
and  homologous  sera  under  various  conditions  we  found  it  impossible  at 
any  time  to  obtain  a  second  generation  by  the  Erdmann  method.  The 
homologous  sera  used  were  rat  and  guinea  pig.  The  heterologous  sera 
were  human,  horse,  beef,  sheep,  pig,  rabbit  and  chicken.  These  sera 
were  used  in  a  dilute  one  to  one,  inactivated,  and  normal  form  and  the 
preparations  were  incubated  at  temperatures  of  10,  15,  20,  25,  28,  30, 
35,  37^/^,  and  40 ''C.    Ascitic  fluid  was  also  used  without  success. 

It   is   true   that   trypanosomes   will   multiply   and   remain   actively 


*  Soc.  Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.,  1914.  XII.  p.  57. 

»  Proc.  Soc.  Exp.  Biol,  and  Med.,  1907,  IV,  p.  40  :  Jour.  Exp.  Zool..  1910,  IX,  p.  787. 

"Jour.  Amer.  Med.  Assn.,   1910,  LV ;  Jour.  Exp.  Zool.,  1911,   X,  p.  63. 

'  Proc.  R.  S.  L..   Ser.  B.,  87,  p.  452. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


299 

motile  when  first  placed  in  a  medium  such  as  described  by  Erdmann. 
We  have  especially  noticed  this  in  connection  with  our  work  with  solid 
media.  Good  survival  forms  of  other  pathogenic  trypanosomes  as  those 
causing  human  sleeping  sickness,  dourine,  and  mal  de  caderas  were 
observed  as  late  as  the  twenty-eighth  day,  but  in  no  case  did  these 
forms  result  in  positive  growth  or  second  generation  when  transplanted 
to  similar  medium  under  similar  conditions. 

In  summing  up  our  work  we  can  positively  say  that  at  no  time, 
under  no  conditions  were  we  able  to  obtain  a  positive  culture  using  the 
Erdmann  cultural  medium.  As  a  matter  of  fact  the  easily  cultivated 
trypanosome  of  Lewis  would  not  develop  successfully  on  this  medium. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


301 
Disposition  and  Intelligence  of  the  Chimpanzee. 


W.  Henry  Sheak — Philadelphia,  Pa. 

I  shall  not,  in  this  brief  paper,  attempt  to  prove  aught  of  the  dis- 
position and  intelligence  of  Anthropopithecus  troglodytes  by  force  of 
argument.  I  shall  merely  set  forth  a  few  of  my  own  personal  observa- 
tions.   You  may  draw  your  own  conclusions. 

The  chimpanzee  is  a  native  of  tropical  Africa,  ranging  from  about 
twelve  degrees  north  of  the  equator  to  ten  degrees  south  of  this  line,  and 
from  the  Atlantic  Ocean  on  the  west,  to  the  Blue  Nile  on  the  east.  But 
these  interesting  animals  seem  to  be  much  more  abundant  in  the  western 
part  of  their  range  than  in  the  eastern;  at  least,  most  of  the  specimens 
we  get  in  captivity  come  from  near  the  Atlantic.  The  chimpanzee  is 
not  nearly  so  large  as  the  gorilla,  and  possibly  not  quite  so  large  as 
the  orang-utan,  but  there  is  not  much  difference  in  size  between  the 
chimpanzee  and  the  orang.  The  adult  males  reach  a  height  of  about 
four  feet  five  inches  and  a  weight  of  from  one  hundred  and  forty  to 
one  hundred  and  sixty  pounds.  The  females  are  not  quite  so  large.  The 
color  is  black,  both  the  hair  and  skin  being  black.  In  some  specimens, 
however,  the  face  is  quite  light  in  color,  and  in  others  there  may  be 
found  considerable  ashy-gray  hair  among  the  black. 

The  chimpanzee  is  the  most  friendly  and  docile  of  the  great  apes, 
differing  in  this  way  from  his  near  relative,  the  gorilla,  which  is  savage 
and  morose,  refusing  to  make  friends  with  man.  I  have  seen  a  young 
chimpanzee  fresh  from  the  jungles,  on  being  taken  from  the  shipping 
box  in  which  he  came  to  America,  throw  his  arms  about  a  man's  neck 
he  had  never  seen  ten  minutes  before,  and  hug  him  affectionately.  To 
me,  one  of  the  most  interesting  things  about  these  great  apes  is  that 
they  know  how  to  express  affection  and  gratitude  by  hugging  and  kissing 
without  being  taught.  A  few  years  ago  I  had  a  big  chimpanzee  called 
Mike,  who  insisted  on  kissing  me,  and  kissing  me  on  the  lips,  when- 
ever I  came  near  him.  This  was  not  the  most  delightful  of  experiences, 
because  Mike's  lips  were  not  always  clean.     Joe,  a  smaller  specimen. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


302 


Sko\'too  .>f  .t  i'hi'utxintoo.  showinc  cl  >«*  rv:*«'rahlan<v  in  structure  to  nian. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


303 

very  intelligent  and  affectioiiate,  and  my  special  pet,  would  often  cuddle 
up  close  to  me,  and  if  I  did  not  voluntarily  put  my  arm  about  him,  he 
would  take  hold  of  my  arm  and  fold  it  about  his  shoulders  or  waist. 

When  Joe  was  only  a  baby,  he  fell  into  the  habit  of  pulling  my  hand 
to  his  mouth  and  biting  my  fingers,  while  I  was  talking  to  the  people 
about  him.  He  was  only  playing  and  did  not  intend  to  hurt  me;  but 
often,  in  his  efforts  to  get  my  hand  to  his  face  and  in  snapping  at  my 
fingers,  he  would  bite  harder  than  he  intended.  Then,  too,  it  was  tire- 
some to  have  him  pulling  on  me  when  I  was  trying  to  talk.  One  morn- 
ing I  got  tired  of  his  pulling  and  biting.  I  was  carrying  a  small  stick 
and  gave  him  a  light  tap  on  the  bare  arm.  He  stopped  instantly,  lifted 
his  pretty  brown  eyes  to  mine  with  an  expression  of  pained  surprise  and 
incredulity  upon  his  face,  as  if  he  could  not  believe  I  would  hit  him 
After  looking  at  me  thus  intently  for  fully  half  a  minute,  he  put  up  hi.^ 
hands,  folded  his  little  black  arms  about  my  neck,  and  hugged  me,  three 
times,  before  he  would  let  me  go.  This  display  of  wounded  feeling  and 
tender  affection  almost  brought  tears  to  my  eyes. 

The  chimpanzee  is  also  affectionate  towards  members  of  his  ov;n 
species  and  towards  other  animals,  especially  his  nearest  relatives,  the 
simians.  Recently  we  had  three  chimpanzees  in  our  collection,  Mike  and 
Joe,  already  mentioned,  and  Jerry,  a  baby  about  thirteen  months  old. 
Joe  and  Mike  were  both  devoted  to  the  baby  and  were  always  readj'  to 
fight  for  him.  Mike  usually  mothered  the  little  fellow,  keeping  him 
under  his  especial  care,  and  was  jealous  of  Joe.  One  morning  Joe  ap- 
propriated the  baby  and  sat  on  the  floor  holding  him  on  his  lap,  much 
the  same  way  that  a  very  small  boy  holds  his  very  big  baby  brother. 
Mike  wanted  the  baby  and  insisted  upon  having  him.  The  two  almost 
came  to  blows  (or  bites)  over  the  youngster.  Mike  was  itching  for  a 
fight  but  knew  that  sure  and  condign  punishment  awaited  him  if  ho 
hurt  his  smaller  companion.  First,  he  took  a  handkerchief  and  tried  to 
strike  Joe  with  it,  much  in  the  spirit  of  the  young  man  who  wanted 
to  fight,  but  was  afraid,  and  exclaimed,  "Fm  so  mad  at  you  I  could 
chew  paper."  Then  he  doubled  up  his  fist  and  commenced  a  fusillade 
of  very  light  taps,  delivered  in  very  rapid  succession  about  the  neck 
and  shoulders  of  his  rival,  just  to  show  him  what  he  would  like  to  do, 
if  he  dared. 


Digitized  by  VjOOQIC 

I 


304 


Fresh  from  the  Old  Sod— A  big  Chimpanzee. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


305 

One  day  baby  Jerry  was  on  top  of  a  cage,  when  he  caught  hold  of  a 
large  wooden  ring  suspended  from  a  rope,  and  swung  off.  He  was  now 
quite  a  distance  from  the  floor,  and  was  afraid  to  drop.  He  could  not 
swing  back  to  the  cage.  Mike  saw  his  dilemma,  got  on  top  of  the  cage, 
reached  out,  caught  the  baby,  folded  him  in  his  arms,  and  carried  him 
in  safety  to  the  floor.  The  keepers  had  always  to  be  on  their  guard 
when  handling  Jerry,  for  fear  Mike  would  mistake  their  intentions  and 
attack.  One  evening,  in  Rochester,  N.  Y.,  a  little  girl  came  behind  the 
guardrail,  attracted  by  the  cunning  antics  of  the  baby,  when  Mike  hit 
her  a  blow  in  the  face  that  brought  the  blood. 

When  Jerry  died,  Mike,  who  had  been  sleeping  with  him,  went  into 
the  box  and  felt  all  over  the  body.  When  the  body  was  taken  in  to  the 
basement,  Mike  insisted  on  following,  and  had  to  be  driven  back  with  a 
shovel.  He  went  to  bed,  but  when  he  found  out  Jerry  was  not  there, 
he  got  up  and  came  out  again.  He  then  sat  about  for  an  hour  or  more, 
grieving  and  crying  in  the  strangely  human-like  voice  of  his  species. 
For  several  days  he  was  listless  and  spiritless. 

After  years  of  experience  in  studying  these  animals  and  living  with 
them,  I  have  come  to  the  careful  and  deliberate  conclusion  that,  up  to 
about  four  years  of  age,  the  chimpanzee  babe  is  not  only  more  precocious, 
but  more  intelligent  than  a  human  child  of  the  same  age.  But  after 
about  four  years  the  chimpanzee  babe  begins  to  fall  behind  and  the 
human  child  to  go  ahead. 

Joe  learned  to  brush  his  hair  with  a  hairbrush,  to  dust  his  clothes 
with  a  whiskbroom,  to  wipe  his  nose  with  a  handkerchief,  to  eat  out  of 
a  cup  with  a  spoon  as  well  as  any  human  child,  to  bore  holes  with  a  brace 
and  bit,  to  use  a  handsaw  quite  dexterously,  to  take  screws  out  of  the 
guardrail  with  a  screwdriver,  to  drive  nails  with  the  hammer  and  pull 
them  out  again  with  the  claw  of  the  hammer,  to  play  on  a  toy  piano, 
and  to  play  on  a  mouthharp.  This  last  is  a  very  diflicult  trick  to  teach 
an  animal.  You  can  not  tell  him  to  expel  the  air  from  his  lungs  and 
you  can  not  show  him  how  to  do  it.  He  must  pick  it  up  himself.  I 
have  known  two  or  three  elephants  to  learn  this  trick,  but,  aside  from 
these,  Joe  was  the  only  other  I  ever  knew  to  accomplish  the  feat.  All 
these  tricks  he  learned  with  little  or  no  teaching.     He  was  a  very  close 

20—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


t    a 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


307 

observer,  and  whatever  he  saw  his  human  friends  do,  he  would  try  him- 
self, until  he  had  acquired  a  long  string  of  accomplishments. 

In  Chicago  an  employe  of  the  menagerie  brought  from  a  Chinese 
restaurant  a  menu  card  printed  in  red  ink.  Joe  seemed  much  interested 
in  this  and  carefully  kept  it  for  a  week  or  ten  days.  With  considerable 
deliberation  he  would  spread  it  out  on  the  floor,  then  follow  the  lines 
slowly  with  his  finger,  as  if  reading.  I  have  observed  that  most  chim- 
panzees are  right-handed,  but  Joe  was  left-handed.  He  always  used  a 
hammer  or  saw  in  his  left  hand,  and  in  studying  this  menu  card  he 
would  follow  the  lines  with  the  index  finger  of  his  left  hand. 

Like  human  children,  chimpanzees  are  fond  of  candy.  But  sweets 
are  forbidden  the  menageries,  owing  to  the  fact  that  the  chimpanzee 
stomach  will  bear  but  little  sugar.  In  spite  of  the  printed  placards, 
however,  well-meaning  but  unwise  visitors  would  often  throw  them 
candy.  One  afternoon  Joe  was  enjoying  to  the  full  a  morsel  of  the  pro- 
scribed dainty,  when  he  saw  his  master  approaching.  He  cunningly 
ducked  his  head  under  a  blanket  so  the  cruel  tyrant,  as  he  doubtless 
considered  his  humanu  persecutor,  could  not  see  what  he  was  eating. 
His  cleverness  was  awarded  by  telling  him  to  eat  the  candy.  Joe  dearly 
loved  to  tease  a  small  Mexican  hairless  dog,  called  Harry,  which  usually 
slept  on  the  stage  near  the  chimpanzee  cage.  He  would  reach  through 
the  bars,  give  the  dog  a  punch,  pinch  him,  or  pull  his  tail,  then  jerk 
his  hand  before  Harry  could  nip  him.  In  this  way  he  kept  the  dog  irri- 
tated much  of  the  time,  and  he  was  always  ready  to  bite  him.  One 
morning  the  manager  came  in  with  some  oranges,  a  fruit  of  which  the 
chimpanzee  is  very  fond.  To  see  how  Joe  would  solve  the  problem,  he 
placed  one  of  the  oranges  directly  under  the  dog*s  nose. 

Joe  was  puzzled  at  first,  but  he  soon  had  an  idea.  He  brought  the 
hammer  from  the  other  end  of  the  cage,  and  with  this  in  his  right  hand 
began  punching  at  Harry.  The  dog  was  ready  for  a  fight,  as  usual,  and 
began  biting  at  the  hammer  handle.  In  this  way  he  gradually  enticed 
him  away  from  the  orange,  then  he  reached  out  with  his  left  hand  and 
took  the  fruit. 

While  exhibiting  our  animals  in  Kansas  City,  we  kept  the  chim- 
panzees in  a  big  cage,  almost  as  large  as  an  ordinary  bedroom.  To  the 
top  of  the  cage  we  had  several  ropes  attached  by  means  of  bolts,  with  a 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


308 

ring  for  a  head.  The  chimpanzees  would  swing  on  these  ropes,  chasing 
each  other  from  end  to  end  of  the  cage.  We  found  that  the  more  exer- 
cise they  took,  the  longer  they  would  live  in  captivity.  One  day  one  of 
the  bolts  came  loose  and  fell  to  the  floor.  The  manager  got  into  the 
cage,  picked  up  the  bolt  and  handing  it  to  Joe,  told  him  to  put  it  up  there 
in  place,  pointing  to  the  hole,  and  hold  it  until  he  could  make  it  fast. 
Joe  took  the  bolt,  climbed  to  the  top  of  the  cage,  put  it  into  its  proper 
hole  and  held  it  there  until  the  manager  got  on  top  and  fastened  it.  The 
head  keeper  was  standing  near,  and  exclaimed,  "By  George,  that's  going 
some."  His  words  expressed  the  thought  of  all  us.  It  was  the  strongest 
manifestation  of  intelligence  I  had  ever  seen  from  an  animal. 

One  Christmas  morning  a  gentleman  with  a  Great  Dane  came  into 
the  room.  Mike  and  Joe  were  much  excited  and  not  a  little  afraid  of 
the  dog.  Joe  climbed  over  the  senior  partner's  back.  Mike  got  a  piece 
of  board  into  which  Joe  had  been  driving  nails,  and  made  desperate  at- 
tempts to  throw  it.  He  would  swing  his  arm  back  and  forth,  but  did 
not  seem  to  understand  just  when  to  let  go,  and  the  board  was  just  as 
likely  to  go  back  over  his  shoulder  as  toward  the  dog.  But  now  and 
then  he  came  very  near  the  dog  and  hit  him  a  telling  blow.  Mike  kept 
practicing  at  throwing  till  he  became  expert.  He  got  into  the  infamous 
habit  of  throwing  the  hammer  out  among  the  people  in  front  of  the  stage, 
and  we  had  to  keep  it  out  of  his  reach.  The  wife  of  the  manager  came 
out  of  the  kitchen  with  a  half  head  of  cabbage  and  cast  it  over  the  bars 
onto  the  stage,  there  being  no  top  on  to  the  chimpanzee  cage  at  that 
time.  Mike  picked  up  the  cabbage  and  tossed  it  back  to  her  with  just 
as  much  dexterity  and  precision  as  she  had  used. 

We  once  had  a  very  intelligent  chimpanzee  called  Sallie.  A  negro 
connected  with  the  menagerie  had  a  needle  and  thread  with  which  he 
mended  his  clothes.  Sallie  watched  the  operation  very  intently.  A  little 
later  she  was  noticed  with  a  string  trying  to  find  an  eye  in  a  nail.  She 
was  given  a  small  darning  needle,  and  a  heavy  cotton  thread,  and  at  once 
threaded  the  needle,  just  as  she  had  seen  the  negro  do.  After  that  she 
could  not  be  deceived.  When  given  a  nail  or  piece  of  wire,  she  would 
look  for  an  eye  and,  if  there  was  none,  she  would  throw  away  the  coun- 
terfeit. She  would  begin  by  wetting  the  end  of  the  thread  in  her  mouth, 
would  place  the  eye  of  her  needle  in  line  with  her  eye,  insert  the  thread 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


309 

from  behind  forward,  then  pull  the  thread  the  remainder  of  the  way  with 
her  lips.  She  often  tried  to  tie  a  knot,  too;  but  in  this  she  was  never  suc- 
cessful. She  always  tried  to  make  the  knot  in  the  thread  up  next  to  the 
needle.  After  a  nimiber  of  successful  attempts  at  this,  she  would  go  to 
work  on  her  dress,  and  sew,  and  sew,  and  sew,  pulling  the  thread  clear 
at  every  stitch.  Sometimes  she  would  amuse  herself  in  this  way  for  half 
an  hour. 

I  often  wondered  if  these  very  intelligent  animals  really  understood 
the  meaning  of  words,  or  whether  they  only  comprehended  a  sentence  or 
phrase  as  a  whole  or  got  the  idea  from  my  gestures  or  the  order  of  the 
performance.  One  morning  I  saw  an  opportunity  to  test  the  matter.  We 
had  a  little  hat  which  I  would  hand  to  Sallie  and  tell  her  put  on  her 
"five  dollar"  hat.  This  she  would  generally  do  very  neatly  and  skillfully, 
but  sometimes  in  the  morning,  when  she  had  just  gotten  out  of  bed,  or 
at  night,  when  she  was  tired  and  sleepy,  she  would  respond  very  indiffer- 
ently, either  getting  the  hat  on  one  side  or  missing  her  head  altogether. 
I  always  had  her  put  on  her  hat  immediately  after  shaking  hands  at  the 
beginning  of  the  lecture.  On  the  morning  in  question,  the  hat  had  fallen 
to  the  stage  floor  near  her  feet.  Shortly  after  the  lecture  commenced,  as 
I  was  finishing  the  talk,  I  said  to  her  without  changing  my  tone  or 
looking  toward  the  hat,  "Sallie  put  on  your  five  dollar  hat."  Without  the 
slightest  hesitation,  she  reached  down,  picked  up  the  hat,  and  put  it  on 
her  head. 

Joe  learned  the  order  of  the  performance,  and  when  I  got  through 
describing  his  hand  to  the  audience,  he  would  proffer  his  foot.  He 
seemed,  too,  to  understand  the  meaning  of  "posterior  limb,"  for,  although 
I  might  change  the  order  of  the  lecture,  the  instant  I  sad  "posterior 
limb,"  he  would  put  up  his  foot. 

One  afternoon,  in  Detroit,  some  one  had  given  Mike  something  to 
eat  in  a  common  earthenware  bowl.  When  I  came  up,  he  had  almost  emp- 
tied the  vessel.  I  knew  he  would  throw  it  to  the  floor  and  break  it,  so 
I  stepped  behind  the  guardrail  and  said,  "Mike,  hand  me  that  bowl." 
Immediately  he  set  down  the  bowl  and  put  out  his  hand.  I  saw  at  once 
that  I,  not  he,  had  blundered.  The  word  "bowl"  was  new  to  him,  he  had 
never  heard  it  before;  but  as  I  had  told  him  to  hand  me  the  bowl,  he  set 
down  the  vessel  and  offered  me  his  hand.     So  I  changed  the  form  of  the 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


310 

command,  "Give  me  that  cup."  He  was  perfectly  familiar  with  the 
word  "cup",  as  he  kept  one  on  the  platform  and,  when  he  was  thirsty, 
gave  it  to  the  keeper  to  fetch  him  a  drink  of  water.  Without  hesitation 
he  picked  up  the  bowl  and  gave  it  to  me,  doubtless  considering  it  merely 
a  cup  of  larger  size. 

One  day,  when  our  Joe  was  a  little  fellow,  he  and  one  of  the  keepers 
got  into  an  argument.  The  keeper  wanted  Joe  to  sit  on  his  chair,  but  he 
refused  to  do  so.  Bad  temper  and  angry  passions  were  prevailing  on 
both  sides.  The  keeper  had  a  whip  and  was  threatening  to  strike.  Joe 
was  showing  his  teeth  and  threatening  to  bite.  I  stepped  behind  the 
guardrail  and  sent  the  keeper  on  an  errand  out  of  the  room.  I  spoke  a 
few  soothing  words  to  Joe.  He  stopped  screaming  and  got  up  on  his 
chair.  In  a  moment  he  had  forgotten  his  trouble.  A  bystander  wanted  to 
know  the  secret  of  my  influence  over  the  animal.  It  was  kindness  and 
love. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


311 
The  Uredinales  op  Delaware.^ 


H.  S.  Jackson — Purdue  University. 


The  following  account  of  the  Uredinales  of  Delaware  is  the  result 
of  a  study  of  the  rust  flora  of  that  State  begun  in  1906,  during  the  time 
when  the  writer  was  connected  with  the  Delaware  College  and  Experi- 
ment Station.  A  preliminary  manuscript  was  prepared  at  that  time  and 
has  since  been  revised  and  amplified  at  various  times  and  finally  rewrit- 
ten in  the  present  form  in  the  winter  of  1916-1917.  A  few  changes  and 
additions  have  since  been  made  to  bring  the  notes  up  to  date. 

The  records  include  all  the  material  in  the  Herbarium  of  the  Dela- 
ware College  Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  together  with  the  collec- 
tions made  by  the  writer  during  a  period  of  three  years,  and  most  of  the 
collections  made  by  the  late  Mr.  A.  Commons  of  Wilmington,  Delaware. 

Mr.  Commons  made  a  very  extensive  collection  of  the  Phanerogams 
and  Fungi  of  the  State,  largely  during  the  period  from  1885  to  1895. 
Most  of  the  fungi  were  determined  by  Mr.  J.  B.  Ellis  and  duplicates  of 
the  specimens  are  now  in  the  herbarium  of  the  New  York  Botanical 
Garden.  A  manuscript  list  of  the  fungi  was  prepared  by  Mr.  Commons, 
but  never  published. 

The  writer  enjoyed  the  privilege  of  a  conference  with  Mr.  Comi.:ons 
in  1907  and  was  permitted  to  make  a  record  of  the  rusts  from  his  manu- 
script list.  His  collection  was  not  available  for  consultation  at  the  time, 
having  been  stored  in  boxes  in  a  garret  in  Wilmington.  Duplicates  of 
most  of  the  specimens,  however,  have  been  found  and  examined  in  the 
Ellis  herbarium  at  the  New  York  Botanical  Garden.  Only  those  speci- 
mens which  the  writer  has  seen  are  included  in  the  present  account. 

A  total  of  129  species  are  recorded  from  the  State,  including  the 
unconnected  species  of  Aecidium  and  one  uncertain  Uredo.  These  are 
recorded  on  232  different  hosts.  A  total  of  about  450  collections  are 
included,  the  greater  number  of  which  were  made  by  the  writer. 

In  recording  the  collections,  the  nearest  poLtoffice  is  given,  together 


*  G)ntribution    from    the    Botanical    Dcpartmenl   of    the    Purdue    University    Agricul- 
tural  Experiment  Station. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


312 

with  the  date  and  name  of  the  collector  if  made  by  another  person  than 
the  writer.  The  numbers  in  parentheses  following  the  date  are  the 
writer's  accession  numbers.  Collections  made  at  Seaford,  July  9,  1907, 
at  Clayton,  July  24,  1907,  and  at  Lewes,  August  14,  1907,  were  made  in 
company  with  Dr.  M.  T.  Cook.  In  the  case  of  collections  made  by  Mr. 
Commons  the  numbers  given  are  those  of  his  manuscript  list. 

An  attempt  has  been  made  to  include  in  the  notes  a  review  of  all 
the  American  culture  work,  together  with  some  reference  to  similar  work 
conducted  by  European  workers. 

A  number  of  field  observations  which  were  made  at  the  time  of 
collecting  the  specimens  have  since  been  used  by  Dr.  J.  C.  Arthur  as 
the  basis  for  successful  culture  work  and  have  been  recorded  elsewhere. 
A  considerable  number  of  collections  of  material  for  culture  work  were 
supplied  him,  a  number  of  special  trips  having  been  made  primarily  for 
this  purpose,  the  expenses  for  which  he  provided  from  the  funds  of  the 
Purdue  University  Agricultural  Experiment  Station.  Many  of  the  speci- 
mens collected,  especially  those  on  grasses  and  sedges,  were  identified  by 
Dr.  Arthur  or  his  associates  in  rust  work.  Many  others,  originally  de- 
termined by  the  writer,  were  sent  him  from  Delaware  for  confirmation. 
Throughout  the  period  of  time  when  the  collections  were  being  made,  a 
continuous  correspondence  was  carried  on  with  Dr.  Arthur  which  proved 
very  stimulating  and  the  writer  is  under  special  obligations  to  him  for 
this  assistance.  Acknowledgment  is  also  gratefully  made  to  any  others 
who  have  in  any  way  aided  in  the  work. 

COLEOSPORIACEAE 

1.    COLEOSPORIUM  CARNEUM  (Bosc.)  comb.  nov. 

Tubercularia  camea  Bosc.  Ges.  Nat.  Freunde  Berlin  Mag.  5:88.  1811. 
Coleosporium  Vernoniae  B.  &  C.  Grevillea  3:57.  1874. 
Peridermium  carneum  Seymour  &  Earle,  Econ.  Fungi  550.     1899. 
On  Carduaceae:  II,  III. 

Vernonia   novehoracensis    (L.)    Willd.,    Lewes,   Aug.    14,    1907, 

(1680) ;  Collins  Beach,  Oct.  1,  1907,  (1912) ;  Newark,  Oct.  25, 

1907  (1978.) 

Arthur    (Mycol.   4:29.      1912),   in   1910   proved  that  Peridermium 

cai^eum  is  genetically  connected  with  Coleosporium  Vernoniae.    Success- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


313 

ful  infection,  resulting  in  the  formation  of  uredinia  and  telia  was  ob- 
tained by  sowing  aeciospores  from  Pinus  taeda  on  Vemonia  crinita,  from 
Florida.  These  results  were  confirmed  in  1911  by  the  same  author 
(Mycol.  4:57.  1912),  who  obtained  successful  infection  on  V,  gigantea, 
using  aecial  material  from  Mississippi;  and  again  in  1913  and  1914 
(Mycol.  7:80,  84.  1915),  when  infection  of  V,  fasciculata  was  obtained 
from  aecial  material  on  P.  taeda  and  P.  palustris  collected  in  Florida. 

The  type  of  Tubercularia  camea  has  not  been  seen,  and  presumably 
is  not  in  existence.  It  seems  desirable,  if  this  name  is  to  be  retained  at 
all,  to  restrict  its  use  to  the  Vemonia  combination  or,  in  case  it  should 
later  be  found  desirable  to  unite  this  species  with  C,  Elepkantopodis,  for 
the  combined  species.  Hedgcock  &  Long  (Phytopath.  7:66-67.  1917) 
record  culture  work  indicating  that  the  two  species  may  be  identical. 
See  also  Phytopathology  8:321,  325.     1918. 

2.    C0LEX)SP0RiUM  DELiCATULUM  (Arth.  &  Kem)  Hedgcock  &  Long,  Phyto- 
path. 3:250.  1913. 
Peridermium  delicatulum  Arth.  &  Kem,  Bull.  Torrey  Club  33:412. 
1906. 

On  Carduaceae:  11,  III. 
Euthamia  graminifolia    (L.)    Nutt.,  Newark,   September  1888, 
F.  D.  Chester;  Clayton,  July  24,  1907,  (1706);  Felton,  Sept. 
5,  1907,  (1746);  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,  (1990). 
This  species  until  recently  has  been  included  with  C.  Solidaginis, 
The  first  suggestion  leading  to  a  true  understanding  of  its  relationship 
was  made  by  Clinton  in  1912  (Conn.  Agr.  Exp.  Station  Report  1912:352., 
1913)  who  observed  P.  delicatulum  on  Pinv^  rigida  in  Conilecticut  associ- 
ated in  the  field  with  Coleosporium  on  Solidago  graminifolia.    He  pointed 
out  a  morphological  correlation  between  the  spore  wall  markings  of  the 
aeciospores  and  the  urediniospores  of  the  two  forms  but  no  cultures  were 
attempted. 

Hedgcock  and  Long  in  1913  (1.  c.)  showed  by  infection  experiments 
that  this  form  is  distinct  and  is  connected  genetically  with  Peridermium 
delicatulum.  Uredinia  developed  on  Euthamia  when  inoculated  with 
aeciospores  of  P.  delicatulum  on  Pinuji  rigida. 

For  a  record  of  additional  culture  work  see  Phytopathology  8:321. 
1918. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


314 

3.  COLEOSPORiUM  Elephantopodis  (Schw.)  Thiim.  Myc.  Univ.  953. 1878. 

Uredo  Elephantopodis  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:70.  1822. 
On  Carduaceae:  II,  III. 
Elephant  opus    caroUniana   Willd.,    Greenbank,    Aug.    24,   1886, 
A.  Commons  (318) ;  Selbyville,  Oct.  4, 1907,  (1753). 
Hedgcock  &  Long  (Phytopath.  7:66-67.     1917)  record  culture  work 
which  indicates  that  this  species  is  identical  with  C.  Vemoniae,    Further 
information  regarding  this  situation  is  to  be  found  in  Phytopathology 
8:321,  325.     1918. 

4.  COLEOSPORIUM   IPOMOEAE    (Schw.)    Burr.   Bull.  111.   Lab.   Nat.  Hist. 
2:217.  1885. 

Uredo  Ipomoeae  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:70.     1822.    Pen- 
dermium  Ipomoeae  Hedge.  &  Hunt,  Mycologia  9:239.     1917. 
On  Convolvulaceae:  II,  III. 
Ipcmoea  hederacea   (L.)   Jacq.,  Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907,   (1683); 

Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,  (1982). 
Ipomoea  pandurata  (L.)  Meyer, — Faulkland,  Sept.  18,  1885,  A. 

Commons   (219). 
Ipomoea  purpurea    (L.)    Roth. — Lewes,  Aug.   14,  1907   (1694). 
Newark,  Sept.  15,  1905   (1539). 
Hedgcock  &  Hunt  (Phytopath.  7:67.  1917)  have  shown  that  a  pre- 
viously undescribed  foliicolous  species  of  Peridermium,  to  which  they 
give  the  name  P.  Ipomoea e,  is  the  aecial  stage  of  this  species. 

5.  COLEOSPORIUM  PiNi  Gall.  Jour.  Myc.  7:44.  1891. 

Gallowayd  Pint  Arth.  Result.  Sci.  Congr.  Bot.  Vienne  336.   1906. 
On  Pinaceae:  III. 

PinuH  virginiana  Mill. — Seaford,  June  4,  1908,  (2095). 

This  species  represents  the  type  of  the  genus  Gallowaya  Arth.  which 
up  to  the  present  time  remains  monotypic.  It  is  in  its  life  history  a 
short  cycle  Coleosporium  bearing  the  same  relation  to  that  genus  that 
Necium  Arth.  does  to  Melampsora  Cast,  and  Chrysomyxa  Ung.  to  Me- 
lampsoropsis  (Schrot.)  Arth.,  etc.,  as  proposed  in  the  revised  classifica- 
tion of  Arthur  (1.  c). 

Galloway  (Bot.  Gaz.  22:433-452.  1896)  has  made  a  very  thorough 
investigation  of  the  life  history,  pathological  histology  and  the  effect  of 
this  fungus  on  this  host.    A  large  series  of  inoculations  were  carried  out 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


315 

proving  conclusively  that  the  fungus  is  autoecious  and  that  telia  only  are 
included  in  the  life  cycle. 

6.    COLEOSPORIUM  SoLiDAGiNis  (Schw.)  ThUm.  Bull.  Torrey  Club  6:216. 
1878. 
Uredo  Solidaginis  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:70.  1822. 
Periderminum  acicolum  Und.  &  Earle,  Bull.  Torrey  Club  23:400. 
1896. 

Peridermium  montanum  Arthur  &  Kern,  Bull.  Torrey  Club  33:413. 
1906. 

On   PiNACEAE:   I. 
Pinus  rigida  Mill.— Seaford,  June  5,  1908,   (2066,  2094)  ;  Har- 
rington, June  5,  1908  (2257). 
On  Carduaceae:  II,  III. 

Solidago    canadensis    L. — Newark,    September,    1888,    F.    D. 
Chester;  Seaford,  July  9, 1907,  (1644) ;  Clayton,  July  24,  1907, 
(1704) ;  Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907,  (1697,  1701). 
Solidago  rugosa  Mill.,  Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907,  (1698). 
Aster  paniculatus  Lam.  Newark,  October,  1907,  (2265,  2248). 
The  life  history  of  this  species  was  first  worked  out  by  Clinton 
(Science  N.  S.  25:289.  1907.  Ann.  Rep.  Conn.  Exp.  Sta.  1906:320.  1907; 
1907:375.     1908).     He  successfully  infected  Solidago  rugosa  with  aecio- 
spores  of  Peridermium  acicolum  on  Piinis  rigida.     The  aecial  material 
used  was  collected  in  three  localities  in  Connecticut  and  three  trials  were 
made,  all  of  which  resulted  in  the  development  of  uredinia.     Telia  fol- 
lowed in  two  cases. 

More  recently  Hedgcock  (Phytopath.  6:65.  1916)  and  Wier  and 
Hubert  (Phytopath.  6:68.  1916)  working  independently,  have  shown  that, 
in  Montana,  the  species  under  discussion  has  for  its  aecial  stage  a 
Peridermium  common  in  the  west  on  the  needles  of  various  pines,  known 
as  P.  montanum  Arth.  &  Kern.  Hedgcock  sowed  aeciospores  collected  on 
Pinus  contorta  in  Montana  on  various  hosts  and  obtained  the  development 
of  aecia  and  telia  on  Aster  conspicuous,  Wier  &  Hubert  also  sowed 
aeciospores  from  the  same  host  and  State  on  a  number  of  local  hosts  for 
Coleosporium  and  obtained  infection  resulting  in  aecia  on  Solidago  cana- 
densis, S.  missouriensis  and  Aster  laevis  geyeri, 

A  review  of  the  present  knowledge  with  reference  to  this  species  can 
be  found  in  Phytopathology  8:324.     1918. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


316 


UREDINACEAE. 


7.    Cronartium  cerebrum    (Peck)    Hedgcock  &  Long,  Jour.  Agr.  Res. 
2:247.    1914. 
Peridermium  cerebrum  Pk.  Bull.  Buff.  Soc.  Nat.  Sci.  1:68.  1873. 
Aeeidium  giganteum  Mahr.  Wald.  Nordam.  120.  1890. 
Cronartium  Quercuum  Miyabe;  Shirai,  Bot.  Mag.  Tokyo  13:74.  1899. 
Peridermium  fusiforme  Arth  &  Kern,  Bull.  Torrey  Club  33:421. 1906. 
On  Pinaceae:  I. 

Ptnu5  virginiana  Mills.,  Seaford,  April  1908,  (2250). 
On  Fagaceae:  II,  III. 

Quercus  coccinea  Wang.,  Seaford,  July  9,  1907,  (1645). 
Quercus  digitata  (Marsh.)  Sudw.,  Seaford,  July  9,  1907,  (1641, 
1642)    (Barth.  Fungi  Columb.  2720) ;  Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907, 
(2249). 
Quercus   marylandica  Moench.,   Seaford,  July  9,   1907,    (1646, 
1647,  1652),  (Barth.  Fungi  Columb.  2719);  Lewes,  Aug.  14, 
1907. 
Quercus  nigra  L.,  Seaford,  July  9,  1907,  (1643). 
The  first  record  of  culture  work  with  this  species  was  made  by 
Shirai    (Bot.  Mag.   13:74.    1899).     He  successfully  inoculated  Quercus 
serrata,  Q.  variabilis  and  Q.  glandulosa  in  Japan,  with  aeciospores  of 
Peridermium  giganteum  (Mahr.)  Tubeuf  from  native  Pinus  sp. 

Shear  (Jour.  Myc.  12:89.  1906)  was  the  first  in  America  to  report 
successful  inoculation  indicating  the  connection  of  Peridermium  cerebrum 
with  the  American  Cronartium  on  Quercus  sp.  He  conducted  out-of- 
door  inoculation  experiments  in  the  vicinity  of  Washington,  D.  C,  using 
aeciospores  of  Peridermium  cerebrum  on  Pinus  virginiana  to  infect  Q. 
coccinea.  The  experiments  resulted  in  the  formation  of  uredinia  followed 
by  telia.  He  also  records  convincing  field  observations  confirming  the 
above  mentioned  culture  work. 

Arthur  in  the  same  year  (Jour.  Myc.  13:194.  1907)  confirmed  Shear's 
results  under  greenhouse  control  by  obtaining  successful  infection  on  Q. 
rehdina  which  resulted  in  the  formation  of  uredinia  and  telia  following 
Aowings  with  aeeial  material  furnished  by  Dr.  Shear,  on  Pinus  tnrginiana. 
These  result?  were  confirmed  by  the  same  author  in  1910  (Mycol.  4:26. 
1£I12)  when  iofection  was  obtained  on  Q.  rubra  using  aecia  on  P.  tnr- 
^tftlcma  from  the  same  locality. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


317 

Hedgcock  in  1908  (Phytopath,  1:131.  1911)  infected  Q.  lobata,  Q. 
rubra  and  Q.  densifolia  echinoides  by  sowing  with  aeciospores  from 
Pirvus  virginiana  and  P.  echinataf  resulting  in  the  formation  of  uredinia 
and  telia  on  all  hosts.  He  also  records  further  inoculation  experiments 
in  1909  and  1910  in  which  14  additional  species  of  Quercus  were  success- 
fully infected  as  was  also  Castanopsis  chrysophylla.  Typical  galls  were 
produced  on  five  species  of  pines  by  introducing  teliospores  from  the  oak 
into  wounds  on  the  limbs.  Many  cross  inoculations  are  recorded  between 
species  of  Quercus  in  which  uredospores  were  used. 

Later  Hedgcock  &  Long  (Jour.  Agr.  Res.  2:247.  1914)  record 
further  inoculation  work  extending  as  well  as  confirming  the  above  re- 
sults and  also  show  by  carefully  conducted  inoculation  experiments  that 
Peridermium  fuaiforme  is  a  synonym  of  the  species  under  discussion. 

Arthur  in  1913  (Mycologia  7:79.  1915)  confirms  Hedgcock  and 
Long's  findings  with  reference  to  Peridermium  fusiforme,  obtaining  suc- 
cessful infection  of  Q.  rubra  and  Q.  Phellos,  following  sowings  with 
aeciospores  from  typical  galls  of  this  species  on  Pinus  taeda  from  Ala- 
bama. 

A  more  recent  view  with  reference  to  the  relation  of  Peridermium 
cerebrum  and  P.  fusiforme  to  the  Cronartium  on  oaks  will  be  found  in 
Phytopathology  8:315-316.    1918.. 

8.   Cronartium  pyriporme  (Peck)  Hedgcock  &  Long,  Alt.  Stage  Perider- 
mium pyriforme  3,  1914. 
Cronartium  Comundrae  Peck,  Bot.  Gaz.  4:128.  1879. 
Peridermium  pyriforme  Peck,  Bull.  Torrey  Club  6:13.  1875. 
On  Santalaceae:  II,  III. 

Comandra  umbellata    (L.)    Nutt.,   Harrington,   June    6,    1908, 
(2070). 
Orton  &  Adams  (Phytopath.  4:25.  1914)  record  convincing  field  ob- 
servations made  in  Pennsylvania  which  led  to  the  conclusion  that  the 
aecial  stage  of  this  species  was  the  much  confused  Peridermium  pyri- 
forme Pk.     No  cultures  were  attempted. 

Hedgcock  and  Long  (1.  c.)  were  the  first  to  conduct  cultures.  They 
succeeded  in  infecting  Comandra  umbellata  by  sowings  with  aeciospores 
from  Pinu^  ponderosa,  resulting  in  typical  uredinia. 

In  a  later  publication  (Bull.  U.  S.  Dept.  Agr.  247:5.  1915)  the  same 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


318 

authors  discuss  this  fungus  at  considerable  length  and  record  in  detail 
the  results  of  infection  experiments. 

Kirkwood  (Phytopath.  5:223-224.  1915)  records  field  infection  ex- 
periments conducted  in  1912  in  which  Comandra  pallida  was  infected  by 
aeciospores  from  Pinus  ponder osa.  The  results  were  inconclusive.  In 
1914  teliospores  were  inserted  in  incisions  in  the  bark  of  young  pine 
trees  resulting  in  a  development  of  mycelium  in  the  tissues,  which  on 
histological  examination  resembled  the  condition  found  in  trees  known 
to  be  natually  infected.  Further  field  infections  similar  to  those  con- 
ducted in  1912  were  carried  out  in  1914. 

9.  Hyalopsora  Polypodii   (DC.)   Magn.  Ber.  Deuts.  Bot.  Ges.  19:582. 

1901. 
Uredo  Polypodii  DC.  Fl.  Fr.  6:81.  1815.. 
On  Polypodiaceae  : 

Felix  fragilis   (L.)    Und.,  Stanton,  July  4,  1894,  A.  Commons 

(2466) ;   Mt.  Cuba,  July  1894,  A.  Commons   (Distributed  in 

Ellis  &  Ev.  Fungi  Columb.  765). 

The  evidence  at  hand  at  the  present  time  leads  to  the  conclusion 

that  this  species  and  other  members  of  the  genus  Hyalopsora  are  heteroe- 

cious.     Bartholomew   (Bull.  Torrey  Club  43:195.  1916)   shows  that  the 

mycelium  of  this  species  is  binucleate  in  all  its  forms  on  the  above  host. 

No  clues  to  the  alternate  host  have  been  suggested. 

10.  KUEHNEOLA  Uredinis   (Lk.)   Arth.  Result.  Sci.  Congr.  Bot.  Vienne 

342.     1906. 
Oidium  Uredinis  Lk.  in  Willd.  Sp.  PI.  6':123.     1824. 
Clirysomyxa  albida  Kiihn,  Bot.  Centr.  16:154.    1883. 
Uredo  Muelleri  Schrot.  Krypt.  Fl.  Schles.  3*:375.  1887. 
Coleosporium  Ruhi  Ellis  &  Holw.  Sacc.  Syll.  Fung.  7:759.   1888. 
On  Rosaceae: 

Rubufs  nigrobacciis  Bailey,  Faulkland,  Sept.  15,  1885,  A.  Com- 
mons   (175),    Oct.    1,    1886,   A.    Commons    (175a)     (type   of 
Coleosporium  Rubi  Ell.  &  Holw.  issued  in  Ellis  &  Ev.  N.  Am. 
Fungi  1878);  Newark,  Sept.  5,  1905  (1629). 
Rnbus  frondosus  Biyel.  Newark,  Sept.  1907  (2012). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


319 

11.  Melampsora  Bigelowii  Thiim.  Mitth.  Forstl.  Vers.  2:37.    1879. 
Uredo  Bigeloivii  Arth.  Result.  Sci.  Congr.  Bot.  Vienne  338.     1906. 

On  Salicaceae:  II,  III. 
Salix   nigra   Marsh.,   Wilmington,   Oct.    4,    1889,   A.    Commons 
(1022);  Newark,  Oct.  6,  1905  (1634),  Sept.  10,  1907  (1729). 
Arthur  in  1903  (Jour.  Myc.  11:60.  1905)  was  the  first  to  show  that 
this  American  species,  like  certain  European  forms  on  Salix,  develops 
its  aecial  stage  on  Larix.     He  obtained  the  development  of  aecia  on 
Larix  decidua  by  using  for  infection,  telial  material  on  Salix  amygda- 
loides,  from  Wisconsin.     These  results  were  confirmed  in  1906   (Jour. 
Myc.  13:194.  1907)  when  similar  successful  infection  was  obtained  on  L. 
decidvxL  following  exposure  to  germinating  telia  on  Salix  sp.  from  In- 
diana.    Wier  and  Hubert  (Phytopath.  6:372.  1916)  used  telia  on  Salix 
Bebbiana  from  Montana  to  successfully  infect  L.  occidentalism  and  on 
S.  cordata  ma^kenzieana  from  Idaho  to  infect  L.  Europea,    Pycnia  and 
aecia  developed  in  abundance  from  both  infections.     (See  also  Phyto- 
path 7:109.     1917;  8:826.     1918.) 

12.  PucciNiASTRUM  Agrimoniae  (Schw.)  Tranz.  Script.  Bot.  Hort.  Univ. 
Petrop.  4:301.   1895. 

Caeoma  Agrimoniae  Schw.  Trans.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  II,  4:291.  1832. 
On  Rosaceae:  II,  III. 

Agrimonia  hirsuta  (MUhl.)    Bicknell,  Newark,  Sept.  19,  1905, 

(1547);  Oct.  1907   (2235). 

No  culture  work  leading  to  the  detection  of  the  alternate  form  of  the 

species  has  been  conducted.     The  aecia,  in  common  with  other  North 

American  species  of  Pucciniastrum,  doubtless  occur  on  the  leaves  of 

Abies  or  Tsuga. 

13.  Pucciniastrum  minimum    (Schw.)    Arth.  Result.  Sci.  Congr.  Bot. 

Vienne  337.     1906. 
Uredo  minima  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:70.    1822. 
Peridermium  Peckii  Thum.  Mitth.  Forstl.  Vers.  Oest.  2:320    (24). 
1880. 

On  Ericaceae:    II. 

Azalea  viscosa  L.,  Collins  Beach,  Oct.  1,  1907  (1910). 
Eraser  in  1910    (Mycol.   4:184.  1912)   was  the  first  to  show  that 
the  alternate  host  for  this  species  is  Tsuga  canadensis.    He  obtained  suc- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


320 

cessful  infection,  resulting  in  pycnia  and  aecia  on  leaves  and  cones  of 
Tsuga  canadensis  (referred  to  Peridermium  Peckii)  by  sowings  with 
telial  material  from  Rhodora  canadensis, 

A  comparison  of  the  morphology  of  all  the  spore  stages  of  this 
species  with  the  following,  taken  together  with  the  close  relationship  of 
the  hosts  involved,  strongly  suggests  that  they  should  be  united  under 
one  name. 

See  also  Phytopathology  8:329-330.     1918. 

14.  PucciNiASTRUM  Myrtilli   (Schum.)   Arth.  Result  Sci.  Congr.  Bot. 
Vienne  337.    1906. 

Aecidium  Myrtilli  Schum.  Enum.  PL  Saell.  2:227.    1803. 
On  Vacciniaceae:  II. 
Vacdnium  vacillans,  Kalm.,   Newark,   Sept.   17,   1907    (2008) ; 
Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907  (1989). 

Clinton  (Rep.  Conn.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  1909-1910:719.  1911)  was  the 
first  to  show  that  the  aecial  stage  of  this  species  occurred  on  Tsuga 
canadensis.  He  successfully  infected  GayliLssacia  ba^cata  by  sowing 
with  aeciospores  from  Tsuga,  resulting  in  the  development  of  the  tjrpical 
uredinia  of  this  species. 

Eraser  in  1912  (Mycol.  5:237.  1913)  confirms  Clinton's  work  by 
obtaining  the  development  of  aecia  on  the  leaves  of  Tsuga  canadensis 
following  sowings  from  teliosporic  material  on  Vacdnium  canadense. 
The  same  author  in  1913  (Mycol.  6:27.  1914)  obtained  aecia  on  Tsuga 
canadensis  following  sowing  of  teliosporic  material  from  Galussacia  re- 
sinosa.  The  aecia  developed  in  these  experiments  are  similar  to  those 
of  Peridermium  Peckii  Thiim.  but  may  represent  an  undescribed  form. 

15.  PUCCINIASTRUM  Pyrolae  (Pers.)  Dietel,  in  Engler  &  Prantl  Nat.  Pfl. 

1,1**  :47.     1897. 
Aecidium  Pyrolae  Pers.  Gmel.  Syst.  Nat.  2:1473.     1791. 
On  Pyrolaceae: 

Chimaphila  maculata  (L.)  Parsh.,  Seaford,  June  5, 1908.  (2075). 

16.  PUCCINIASTRUM  PUSTULARUM    (Pers.)   Dietel,  in  E.  &  P.  Nat.  Pfl. 

1,1**  :47.     1897. 
Uredo  pustulata  Pers.  Syn.  Fung.  219.   1801. 
Pucciniastrum  Epilobii  Otth.  Mitth.  Nat.  Ges.  Bern  1861:72.  1861. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


321 

Pucciniastrum  Abieti-Cfiamaenerii  Kleb.  Jahrb.  Wiss.  Bot.  34:387. 
1900. 

On  Onagraceae:  II. 

Epilobium  coloratum  Muhl.,  Mt.  Cuba,  Sept.  20,  1893,  A.  Com- 
mons (2262). 

Klebahn  (Zeits.  Pflanzenkr.  9:22-26.  1899)  and  other  European  in- 
vestigators have  shown  that  the  aecial  stage  of  the  rust  on  species  of 
Epilobium  belonging  to  the  section  Chamaenerion  occurs  in  Europe  on 
Abies  pectinata. 

Eraser  in  1910  (Mycol.  4:176.  1912)  was  the  first  in  America  to 
record  successful  cultural  experiments  with  this  species.  He  showed 
that  the  aecia  were  found  on  Abies  balsamea  using  for  infection  telia 
from  Epilobium  angustifolium  collected  in  Nova  Scotia.  The  aeciospores 
thus  produced  were  used  to  infect  Epilobium  angustifolium,  and  the 
typical  uredinia  of  this  species  resulted.  Weir  and  Hubert  (Phytopath. 
6:373.  1916)  using  telial  material  from  the  same  host  collected  in  Idaho 
obtained  development  of  pycnia  on  Abies  lasiocarpa. 

It  will  be  noted  that  all  the  cultural  work  has  been  conducted 
with  but  one  American  species  of  Epilobium  which  belongs  in  the  same 
group  as  those  successfully  cultured  in  Europe.  It  is  probable  that 
there  are  at  least  two  distinct  biological  races  involved.  Sydow  (Monog. 
Ured.  3:442-444.  1915)  recognizes  two  species. 

See  also  Phytopathology  8:328-329.  1918  for  a  review  of  more 
recent  work. 

17.  Uredinopsis  Atkinsonii  Magn.  Hedwigia  43:123.  1904. 

On  Polypodiaceae: 

Dryopteris  Thelypteris   (L.)   A.  Gray,  Stanton,  July  13,  1894, 

A.  Commons  (2471). 

Eraser  in  1912  (Mycol.  5:236.  1913)  proved  that  this  species  has  its 

aecial  stage  on  Abies  balsamea  (Peridermium  balsameum  Pk.  p.  p.)  by 

successfully    infecting   Dryopteris    Thelypteris    with    aeciospores    from 

Abies  balsamea  with  production  of  uredinia. 

18.  Uredinopsis  mirabilis  (Pk.)  Magn.  Hedwigia  43:121.  1904. 
Septoria  mirabilis  Pk.  Ann.  Rep.  N.  Y.  Mus.  25:87.    1873. 

On  Polypodiaceae: 

Lorinseria  areolata  (L.)  Presl.,  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,  (1755). 
Onoclea  sensibilis  L.,  Newark,  Oct.  1907,   (2259). 

21—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


322 

Fraser  in  1910  (Mycol.  4:189.  1912)  conducted  inconclusive  culture 
experiments  indicating  that  this  species  on  Onoclea  sensibilis  had  for  its 
aecial  stage  a  Peridermium  on  Abies  balsaniea.  In  1912  (Mycol.  5:236. 
1913),  however,  the  same  author  demonstrated  conclusively  that  such  was 
the  case.  Teliosporic  material  on  Onoclea  sensibilis  L.  was  used  to  suc- 
cessfully infect  the  leaves  of  Abies  balsamea  resulting  in  pycnia  and 
aecia  of  Peridermium  balsameum.  In  three  trials  using  aeciospores 
from  Abies  balsamea,  uredinia  developed  on  Onoclea.  In  1913  (Mycol. 
6:25.  1914)  the  results  of  1912  were  repeatedly  confirmed.  The  species 
of  the  genus  Uredinopsis  are  separated  on  rather  slight  morphological 
characters.  Fraser  reports  the  results  of  experiments,  however,  that 
indicate  that  this  species  is  at  least  biologically  distinct. 

PUCCINIACEAE. 

19.     Gymnoconia  interstitialis  (Schlecht.)   Lag.  Tromso  Mus.  Aarsh. 
16:140.     1894. 
Caeoma  interstitiale  Schlecht.    Horae  Phys.  Berol.  96.     1820. 
Aecidium  nitens  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:69.     1822. 
Puccinia  Peckiana  Howe;  Peck,  Ann.  Rep.  N.  Y.  State  Mus.  23:57. 

1872. 
Puccinia  tripustulata  Peck,  Ann.  Rep.  N.  Y.  State  Mus.  24:91.   1872. 
Gymnoconia  Peckiana  Trotter,  Fl.  Ital.  Crypt.  1":338.     1910. 
Kunkelia  nitens  Arth.  Bot.  Gaz.  58:504.     1917. 
On  Rosaceae:   I. 

Rubtis  allegheniensis  Porter,  Newark,  May  1889,  F.  D.  Chester. 

Rubus  villosus  Ait.,  Newark,  May  15,  1907,    (1620),  June  16, 

1907,  M.  T.  Cook,  (1661). 

Tranzschel   (Hedwigia  32:257.  1893)  was  the  first  to  report  success 

in  culturing  this  species.     He  succeeded  in  obtaining  the  development  of 

Puccinia  Peckiana  Howe  on  Rubus  saxatilis  by  sowing  spores  of  Caeoma 

nitens  Bur  rill. 

In  America  Clinton  (Bot.  Gaz.  19:116.  1895)  confirmed  Tranzschel's 
work  by  successfully  infecting  Rubus  villosus  with  production  of  telia. 
He  used  aecial  material  from  the  same  host. 

Kunkel  (Bull.  Torrey  Club  40:361-366.  1913;  Am.  Jour.  Bot.  1:37- 
47.     1914)   has  shown  that  Caeoma  nitens  on  Rubus  frondosus  behaves 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


323 

like  a  short  cycle  telial  form  comparable  to  Endophyllum,  since  the  so- 
called  aeciospores  germinate  like  teliospores.  In  a  later  study  (Bull. 
Torrey  Club  43:559-569.  1916)  Kunkel  concludes  that  there  are  two 
forms  of  orange  rust  of  Kubus  in  North  America.  He  found  that  in 
certain  collections  the  spores  germinate  as  aeciospores  with  germ  tube, 
while  in  others  they  germinate  as  teliospores.  Arthur  (1.  c.)  concurs 
in  this  view  and  establishes  the  genus  Kunkelia  for  the  short  cycled 
form.  Atkinson  (Am.  Jour.  Bot.  5:79-83.  1918)  presents  evidence  in  sup- 
port of  the  contention  that  only  one  species  should  be  recognized  and 
that  it  represents  a  form  whose  life  history  is  unstable  and  that  the 
spores  may  germinate  either  as  aeciospores  which  on  infection  develop 
teliosi>ores  of  Puccinia  Peckianay  or  as  teliospores  which,  following  in- 
fection, result  in  a  repetition  of  the  caeomoid  aecial  form.  He  considers 
that  the  behavior  of  the  spores  is  dependent  on  certain  conditions,  the 
most  important  of  which  is  temperature.  Until  more  evidence  is  avail- 
able it  seems  best  to  continue  to  list  this  species  under  the  old  name. 

20.     Gymnosporangium  Botryapites   (Schw.)   Kern,  Bull.  Torrey  Club 
35:506.     1908. 

Caeoma  Botryapites  Schw.  Trans.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  II.  4:294.     1832. 

Gymnosporangium  biseptatum  Ellis,  Bull.  Torrey  Club  5:46.     1874. 
On  Juniperaceae:    III. 

Chamaecyparis  thyoides  (L.)  B.S.P.,  Seaford,  April  14,  1908. 

Dr.  W.  G.  Farlow  (Anniv.  Mem.  Bost.  Soc.  Nat.  Hist.  35:1880)  was 
the  first  to  attempt  infection  experiments  with  this  species.  He  reports 
success  in  obtaining  pycnia  on  Crataegus  tomentosa.  It  is  noteworthy 
that  later  studies  have  not  confirmed  the  occurrence  of  the  species  on 
Crataegus.  Later  (Proc.  Am.  Acad.  Nat.  Sci.  12:313.  1885)  spermo- 
gonia  were  obtained  on  leaves  and  stems  of  Amelanchier  canadensis. 
Dr.  R.  Thaxter  (Proc.  Am.  Acad.  Nat.  Sci.  14:263.  1887)  obtained  the 
development  of  aecia  on  Amelanchier  canadensis  which  were  recognized 
to  be  Roestelia  Botryapites  (Schw.)  C.  &  E.  These  results  were  later 
repeatedly  confirmed   (Conn.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Bull.  107:4.     1891). 

Dr.  J.  C.  Arthur  (Mycol.  1:240.  1909)  records  successful  infection 
of  Amelanchier  intermedia  from  telial  material  collected  by  the  writer 
at  Newfield,  N.  J.,  pycnia  only  resulting. 

Dodge    (Torreya  15:133-134.     1915;   Bull.  Torrey  Club  42:519-542. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


324 

1915)  conducted  an  extensive  investigation  of  this  species  in  comparison 
with  G.  transformans.  In  connection  with  this  work  he  repeatedly 
obtained  infection  by  using  telia  from  galls  on  Chamaecyparis  thyaides, 
on  A.  canadensis.  A,  intermedia  and  A,  Amelanchier  which  resulted  in 
the  development  of  Roestelia  Botryapites,  (c.  f.  27).  He  failed  to  obtain 
any  infection  on  Aronia. 

21.     Gymnosporangium   clavariaeforme    (Jacq.)    DC.    Fl.   Fr.   2:217. 
1895. 

Tremella  clavariaeformis  Jacq.  Coll.  2:174.     1788. 
On  Malaceae:    I. 

Amelanchier  canadensis  (L.)  Medic,  Felton,  June  8,  1893,  F.  D. 
Chester. 

The  alternate  host  for  this  species  occurs  on  Juniperus  communis 
L.  and  J.  sibirica  Burgsd. 

Oersted  (Overs.  Vid.  Selsk.  Forh.  210,  1867;  Bot.  Zeit.  222,  1867) 
was  the  first  to  carry  out  infection  experiments  with  this  species.  He 
successfully  infected  Crataegtis  oxycantha  following  sowings  with  telial 
material.  This  species  has  since  been  frequently  cultured  by  European 
investigators  and  the  results  have  been  fully  summarized  by  Klebahn 
(Die  Wirtswechselden  Rostpilze  339-345.     1904). 

In  America,  Thaxter  (Proc.  Am.  Acad.  Sci.  22:262.  1887;  Bot.  Gaz. 
14:166.  1889)  was  the  first  to  conduct  definite  cultures.  He  succeeded 
in  obtaining  the  development  of  an  abundance  of  pycnia  and  aecia  on 
Crataegus  tomentosa  and  Amelanchier  canadensis. 

Dr.  J.  C.  Arthur  (Jour.  Myc,  14:19.  1908)  in  1907  succeeded  in 
obtaining  infection  of  Amelanchier  intermedia  following  sowings  of 
sporidia  from  Juniperus  sibirica  with  development  of  pycnia  only.  In 
1908  (Mycol.  1:239.  1909)  aecia  were  obtained  on  Amelanchier  erecta 
following  sowings  of  sporidia  from  J,  sibirica  from  Colorado.  In  1910, 
(Mycol.  4:24.  1912)  using  similar  infection  material,  the  same  author 
succeeded  in  obtaining  pycnia  and  aecia  on  Amelanchier  erecta  and 
pycnia  on  Crataegus  punctata.  In  1911  (Mycol.  4:56.  1912)  the  same 
results  on  Amelanchier  erecta  were  obtained  as  in  1910,  using  telial 
material  from  the  same  locality.  In  1913  (Mycol.  7:79.  1915)  pycnia 
were  obtained  on  Crataegus  cerronus,  following  inoculation  with  telia 
from  Colorado  on  Juniperus  sibirica. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


325 

22.     Gymnosporangium  germinale    (Schw.)    Kern,  Bull.  Torrey  Club 
35:506.     1908. 

Caeoma  germinale  Schw.  Trans.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  II.  4:294.     1832. 

Gymnosporangium  clavipes  Cooke  &  Peck;  Cooke,  Jour.  Quek.  Club 
2:267.     1871. 

Roestelia  aurantica  Pk.  Bull.  Buffalo  Soc.  Nat.  Sci.  1:68.     1873. 
On  Malaceae:    I. 

Cydonia  vulgaris    (L.)    Pers.,   Smyrna,  July   15,   1895,  comm. 
J.  C.  Stockley;  Felton,  Aug.  1897,  F.  D.  Chester. 
On  Juniperaceae:    III. 

Juniperus  virginiana  L.,  Iron  Hill,  May  1897,  F.  D.  Chester; 
Seaford,  April  14,  1908,   (2252). 

Dr.  W.  G.  Farlow  was  the  first  to  conduct  culture  experiments  with 
this  species.  In  1883  (Proc.  Am.  Acad.  Sci.  2b:313.  1885)  using  telia 
from  Juniperus  virginiana  he  succeeded  in  obtaining  the  development  of 
pycnia  on  leaves  of  Malus  Mahis,  Aronia  arbuti folia  and  Amelanchier 
canadensis,  but  aecia  did  not  develop. 

Dr.  R.  Thaxter  (Bot.  Gaz.  11:236.  1886;  Proc.  Am.  Acad.  Sci. 
22:264.  1887)  conducted  similar  cultural  work  obtaining  well  developed 
aecia  on  Amelanchier  canadensis  and  pycnia  on  Malus  Malus. 

Dr.  J.  C.  Arthur  in  1907  (Jour.  Myc.  14:18.  1908)  using  material 
on  Juniperus  sibirica  from  Illinois  secured  infection  on  leaves  of  Amelan- 
chier intermedia  and  on  fruit  of  A.  erecta  with  development  of  pycnia 
only.  In  1908  the  same  author  (Mycol.  1:239.  1909)  using  telial  ma- 
terial from  J.  virginiana  from  Kentucky  succeeded  in  developing  pycnia 
and  aecia  on  Crataegus  sp.  In  1909  (Mycol.  2:229.  1910)  successful 
infection  of  Amelanchier  erecta  with  development  of  aecia  in  abundance 
and  of  Crataegus  punctata  with  development  of  pycnia  only  was  ob- 
tained. Telial  material  from  J.  sibirica  from  Michigan  was  used  in 
these  experiments.  In  1910,  (Mycol.  4:24.  1912)  using  telial  material 
from  Wisconsin  on  J.  sibirica,  successful  infection  of  Amelanchier  erecta 
and  Crataegus  tomentosa  was  obtained  resulting  in  abundant  aecia  in 
both  cases.  Aeciospores  from  the  Amelanchier  were  used  in  June  1910 
to  inoculate  J.  sibirica  resulting  in  the  development  of  telia  the  follow- 
ing spring. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


326 

23.  Gymnosporangium  globosum  Farl  Anniv.  Mem.  Boston  Soc.  Nat, 

Hist.  18.     1880. 
On  Malaceae:    I. 

Crataegus   phaenopyrum    (L.    f.)    Medic,   Newark,   Oct.    1888, 
F.  D.  Chester. 

Dr.  W.  G.  Farlow  (Anniv.  Mem.  Boston  Soc.  Nat.  Hist.  34:1880 
and  Proc.  Am.  Acad.  N.  S.  12:312.  1885)  was  the  first  to  conduct 
infection  experiments  with  this  species.  He  succeeded  in  obtaining 
pycnia  only  on  Crataegus  tomentosa,  C.  Douglasii,  C.  oxya^anthu,  fol- 
lowing sowings  with  telial  material  from  J,  virginiana.  Dr.  R.  Thaxter 
(Proc.  Am.  Acad.  Sci.  22:263.  1887;  Bot.  Gaz.  14:167.  1889)  succeeded 
in  obtaining  infection  resulting  in  aecia  on  Crataegus  coecinea  and 
Malus  Malus  and  spermogonia  on  Sorbus  americana  and  Cydonia  vul- 
garis. 

In  a  later  report  (Conn.  Agr.  Exp.  Sta.  Bull.  107:4.  1891)  addi- 
tional work  is  recorded  confirming  the  previous  results  on  Malus  Malus 
and  recording  successful  infection  of  Sorbus  amei^ana  resulting' in  the 
development  of  aecia. 

Dr.  J.  C.  Arthur  in  1906  (Jour.  Myc.  13:200.  1907)  using  a  telial 
material  from  Juniperus  virginiana  from  Indiana  obtained  aecia  on 
Crataegus  Pringlei.  Similar  material  from  West  Virginia  gave  aecia 
on  Sorfetts  americana  and  pycnia  on  Crataegus  Pringlei  and  Malus  coro- 
naria.  In  1907,  (Jour.  Myc.  14:18.  1908)  infection  from  telial  material 
from  Indiana  resulting  in  aecia,  was  secured  on  Malus  Malus.  In  1908 
(Mycol.  1:239.  1909)  infection  resulting  in  aecia  was  obtained  on  Cra- 
taegus Pringlei,  using  telial  material  from  Massachusetts.  Pycnia  were 
also  obtained  on  Crataegus  sp.  using  telial  material  from  Kentucky.  In 
1909  (Mycol.  2:229.  1910)  successful  infection  resulting  in  aecia  was 
obtained  on  Crataegus  coecinea  using  infecting  material  from  North 
Carolina. 

24.  Gymnosporangium   Juniperi-virginianae   Schw.    Schr.   Nat.    Ges. 

Leipzig  1:74.     1822. 
Gymnosporangium  macropus  Lk.  in  Willd.  Sp.  PI.  6^:128.     1826. 
Aecidium  pyratum  Schw.  Trans.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  II.  4:309.     1832. 
Roestelia  jryrata  Thax.  Proc.  Am.  Acad.  22:269.     1887. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


327 

On  Malaceae:    I. 

Pyrus  coronaria  L.,  Wilmington,  Aug.  26,  1886,  A.  Commons. 
Pyrm  malus  L.,  Felton,  Sept.  5,  1907   (1737). 
On  Juniperaceae:    III. 

Juniperus    virginiana    L.,    Georgetown,    May    18,    1892,    F.    D. 
Chester;  Lincoln  City,  May  1906,  H.  S.  Jackson. 

The  species  recorded  above  is  the  common  cedar-apple  rust  known 
throughout  the  eastern  United  States  and  is  one  of  the  serious  apple 
diseases  often,  in  epidemic  years,  causing  enormous  losses.  An  account 
of  this  disease  in  Delaware  with  a  list  of  susceptible  and  immune  varie- 
ties has  been  prepared  by  Chester  (Del.  Exp.  Sta.  Rep.  8:63-69.     1896). 

Farlow  in  1877  and  1883  (Aniv.  Mem.  Boston  Soc.  Nat.  Hist. 
35:1880;  Proc,  Am.  Acad.  20:313,  314.  1885)  was  the  first  to  attempt 
culture  work  with  this  species.  He  obtained  incomplete  proof  of  the 
life  history.  In  1886  Thaxter  (Proc.  Am.  Acad.  22:257.  1887)  first 
conducted  cultures  establishing  the  genetic  relation  of  the  common  apple 
rust  (Roestelia  pyrata)  and  G.  macroptis.  He  succeeded  in  obtaining 
aecia  on  Pyrus  mains  following  sowing  of  teliospores  from  J,  virginiana. 
The  results  were  repeated  and  confirmed  in  1887  (Bot.  Gaz.  14:166. 
1889).  Halsted  in  1886  (Bot.  Gaz.  11:190.  1886;  Bull.  Iowa  Agr.  Coll. 
Dept.  Bot.  69.  1886)  obtained  infection  on  Pyrus  lowensis  resulting  in 
aecia. 

Stewart  and  Carver  in  1896  (Rep.  N.  Y.  (Geneva)  Exp.  Sta.  14:535. 
1896)  conducted  culture  experiments  in  New  York  and  Iowa  and  obtained 
infection  of  apples  in  New  York  using  telia  collected  in  Iowa  as  well  as 
locally,  with  successful  development  of  aecia  on  some  varieties.  In  Iowa 
infection  could  only  be  obtained  on  wild  crab  when  either  New  York  or 
Iowa  telia  were  used.  The  results  are  recorded  in  considerable  detail 
and  are  exceedingly  interesting  and  difficult  of  explanation. 

In  1901  Panmiel  (Bull.  Iowa  Exp.  Sta.  84:24.  1906)  conducted 
cultural  experiments  and  reports  infection  of  Pyrus  lowensis  and  Cra- 
taegtis  mollis  and  C.  pinnatifida  with  development  of  aecia  using  telial 
material  from  both  New  York  and  Missouri. 

Arthur  in  1905  (Jour.  Myc.  12:13.  1906)  using  telial  material  from 
Iowa  and  North  Carolina  obtained  infection  resulting  in  abundant  pycnia 
on  the  apple  from  both  sources.    In  1906  and  1907  and  1910  (Jour.  Myc. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


328 

13:200.  1907;  14:17.  1908;  Mycol.  4:24.  1912)  pycnia  were  again 
obtained  on  apple  following  sowings  from  telial  material  from  Indiana. 
In  1916  Reed  and  Crabill  (Tech.  Bull.  Va.  Exp.  Sta.  9:43-45.  1915) 
report  the  results  of  numerous  infection  experiments-  on  different  varie- 
ties of  cultivated  apples.  Their  experiments  bring  out  strongly  the 
well  established  fact  that  some  varieties  are  susceptible  and  other  rela- 
tively or  totally  immune.  They  also  show  that  only  young  leaves  are 
susceptible. 

25.  Gymnosporangium   Myricatum    (Schw.)    Fromme,   Mycol.   6:229. 

1914. 
Caeoma  (Aecidium)   Myricatum  Schw.   Trans.   Am.   Phil.   Soc.   II. 
4:294.     1832. 

Podisoma  Ellisii  Berk.  Grevillea  3:56.     1844. 
Gymnosporangium  Ellisii  Farl.,  Ellis  N.  A.  Fungi  271.     1879. 
On  Myricaceae:    I. 

Myrica  cerifera  L.,  Seaford,  July  9,  1907   (1648). 
On  Juniperaceae:    III. 

Chamaecyparis  thy  aides  (L.)  B.  S.  P.,  Seaford,  April  14,  1908 
(2251). 
Fromme  (1.  c.)  has  shown  by  infection  experiments  and  field  obser- 
vations that  the  well  known  Gymnosporangium  Ellisii  has  for  its  aecial 
stage  Aecidium  Myricatum,  This  is  especially  remarkable  since  only 
one  other  Gymnosporangium  (G,  Blasdaleanum)  has  been  definitely 
shown  by  infection  experiments  to  have  aecia  of  the  cupulate  type,  and 
since  no  other  species  of  Gymnosporangium  is  known  to  have  an  aecial 
host  in  other  than  the  Rosales. 

26.  Gymnosporangium  nidus-avis  Thaxter,  Bull.  Conn.  Exp.  Sta.  107:6. 

1891. 
On  Juniperaceae:    III. 

Juniperus  virginiana  L.,  Lewes,  April  16,  1908  (2243). 
This  species  produces  largely  "witches'  brooms"  on  the  red  cedar. 
Thaxter  conducted  culture  experiments  in  1886  and  in  1887  (Proc. 
Amer.  Acad.  22:264.  1887;  Bot.  Gaz.  14:167.  1889)  in  which  he  infected 
Amelanchier  canadensis  with  production  of  pycnia  and  aecia  in  abun- 
dance using  sporidia  of  the  above  species,  at  that  time  undescribed,  but 
referred  to  G.  conicum.    In  1891  Thaxter  (1.  c.)   stated  "infections  with 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


329 

this  species  have  been  conducted  every  year  since  the  spring  of  1886 
.     .     .     and  the  results  in  all  the  cultures  were  identical." 

Arthur  in  1907  (Jour.  Myc.  14:19.  1908),  using  sporidia  from 
•/.  virginiana  collected  in  Illinois,  obtained  successful  infection  of  Mains 
Maltis  with  production  of  pycnia  followed  by  aecia,  but  failed  to  obtain 
infection  of  Amelanchier  intermedia.  In  1909  (Mycol.  2:230.  1910) 
successful  infection  of  Crataegus  PHnglei  with  production  of  pycnia 
only,  and  of  Malus  lowensis  with  development  of  aecia  was  obtained,  but 
without  infection  on  Amelanchier  canadensis.  In  1910  (Mycol.  4:25. 
1912)  infection  of  Cydonia  vulgaris  and  Amelanchier  vulgaris  with  pro- 
duction of  pycnia  only  is  recorded.  In  1911  (Mycol.  4:56.  1912)  using 
sporidia  from  New  Jersey  successful  infection  of  Amelanchier  erecta 
resulted  in  the  production  of  aecia  on  fruits;  using  sporidia  from  Ne- 
braska successful  infection  of  Malus  coronaria  with  production  of  pycnia 
only  is  recorded.  In  1914  (Mycol.  7:83.  1915)  Amelanchier  vulgaris 
was  inoculated  with  telial  material  from  Massachusetts  and  abundant 
production  of  pycnia  and  aecia  resulted. 

27.     Gymnosporangium  transformans   (Ellis)   Kern,  Bull.  N.  Y.  Bot. 
Gard.  7:463.     1911. 

Roestelia  transformans  Ellis;  Peck,  Bull.  Torrey  Club  5:3.     1874. 

Gymnosporangium  fratemum  Kern,  Bull.  N.  Y.  Bot.  Gard.  7:439. 
1911. 

On  Malaceae:    I. 

Aronia  arbutifolia  (L.  f.)   Ell.,  Seaford,  June  1908   (2262). 

The  above  collection  is  of  pycnia  only. 

Dodge  (Torreya  15:133-134.  1915;  Bull.  Torrey  Club  42:519-542. 
1915)  has  studied  the  foliicolous  form  occurring  on  Chamaecyparis 
thyoides  which  until  Kern's  monographic  study  (1.  c.)  had  been  con- 
sidered a  form  of  G.  biseptatum.  His  work  clearly  shows  that  this  leaf 
form  has  for  its  aecia  Roestelia  transformans  on  Aronia  having  repeat- 
edly obtained  infection  followed  by  development  of  aecia  on  A.  arbuti- 
folia and  A.  nigra.  He  also  claims  to  have  obtained  infection  with  the 
leaf  form  on  Amelanchier  intermedia,  A.  canadensis  and  A.  Amelanchier, 
resulting  in  the  development  of  aecia  having  the  morphology  of  R.  Bot- 
ryapites  which  has  been  repeatedly  shown  to  go  to  the  branch  form 
known  commonly  as  G.  biseptatum.     The  young  infections  of  G.  bisep- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


330 

tatum  which  occur  on  the  young  twigs  may  easily  be  confused  with  the 
leaf  form  unless  microscopically  examined,  and  might  have  been  mixed 
with  the  material  of  G.  fratemum  used  in  the  infection  experiments. 

28.  Phragmidium  americanum  Diet.  Hedwigia  44:124.    1905. 

On  Rosaceae: 

Rosa  Carolina  L.  Collins  Beach,  Oct.  1,  1907. 
Rosa  humilis  Marsh.,   Seaford,  June   4,   1908    (2050) ;   Lewes, 
Aug.  14,  1907   (1685). 

29.  Phragmidium  disciflorum   (Tode)  J.  F.  James,  Cont.  U.  S.  Nat 

Herb.  3:276.     1895. 
Ascophora  disciflora  Tode,  Fungi  Meckl.  1:16.     1790. 
On  Rosaceae: 
Rosa  sp.  (cultivated),  Newark,  September  1888,  F.  D.  Chester. 

30.  Phragmidium   Duchesneae    (Arth.)    Sydow,   Monog.    Ured.   3:93. 

1912. 
Kuehneola  Duchesneae  Arthur,  N.  A.  Flora  7:185.     1912. 
Frommea  Duchesneae  Arthur,  Bull.  Torrey  Club  44:504.     1917. 
On  Rosaceae: 

Duchesnea  Indica  (Ards.)  Focke,  II,  Newark,  May  1908,  H.  S. 
Jackson;  III,  Wilmington,  Nov.  1,  1890,  A.  Commons  (1686). 
This  species  and  the  following  possess  only  uredinia  (primary  and 
secondary)  and  telia  in  their  life  cycle  differing  from  the  commoner 
species  occurring  on  Rubus  and  Rosa  in  the  absence  of  any  Caeoma 
stage.  As  suggested  by  Arthur  (Phytopath.  6:100.  1916;  Bull.  Torrey 
Club  44:501-511.  1917)  their  affinities  are  with  Phragmidium  rather 
than  with  Kuehneola  which  doubtless  belongs  in  the  Uredinaceae.  In 
the  classification  of  the  Uredinales  based  on  the  length  of  life  cycle, 
proposed  by  Arthur  (Result.  Sci.  Congr.  Bot.  Vienna  in  1906)  these 
species  would  represent  a  genus  in  the  Phragfmidiatae  bearing  the  same 
relation  to  Phragmidium  and  Earlea  that  Bullaria  does  to  Dicaeoma 
and  Dasyspora  in  the  Dicaeomatae.  Frommea  Arthur  (1.  c.)  has  been 
proposed  as  the  name  of  this  genus. 

31.  Phragmidium  triarticulatum  (B.  &  C.)  Farl.,  Bull.  Bussey  Inst 

1:433.     1876. 
Aregma  triarticulatum  Berk.  &  Curtis;  Berk.  Grevillea  3:51.     1874. 
Kuehneola  obtiLsa   Arthur   N.   A.    Flora   7':  185.     1912.     p.   p. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


331 

Phragmidium  Potentillae-canadensis  Diet.  Hedw.  Beibl.  42;]  79.  1903. 
Frommea  obtnsa  Arth.  Bull.  Torrey  Club  44:503.     1917. 
On  Rosaceae: 

Potentilla  canadensis  L.,  Newark,  September  1907   (2004). 

32.  PiLEOLARiA  ToxicoDENDRi  (Berk.  &  Rav.)  Arth.  N.  A.  Flora  7=:147. 

1907. 
Uromyces  Toxicodendri  Berk  &  Rav.  Grevillea  3:56.     1874. 
On  Sapindaceae: 

Rhus  radicans  L.,  Stanton,  Sept.  10,  1885,  A.  Commons   (184). 

33.  POLYTHELis  FUSCA  (Pers)  Arth.  Result  Sci.  Congr.  Bot.  Vienne  341. 

1906. 
Aecidium  fuscum  Pers.  Linn.  Syst.  Nat.  2=":  1873.    1791. 
Puccinia  fusca  Wint.  Rabh.  Krypt.  Fl.  1:199.     1884. 
On  Ranunculaceae: 

Anemone  quinquefolia  L.,  Newark,  April  13,  1908,  (2255). 
The  mycelium  of  this  species  is  perennial  as  first  shown  by  DeBary 
(Monatsber.  K.  Akad.  d.  Wiss.  Berlin  1865).  Plants  affected  by  this 
rust  are  deformed,  slightly  dwarfed  and  seldom  if  ever  flower.  The 
leaves  are  paler  and  narrower  than  normal  and  are  considerably 
thickened. 

34.  Puccinia  Agropyri  E.  &  E.  Jour.  Myc.  7:131.     1892. 

On  Poaceae: 

Agropyron  repens  L.,  Newark,  August  23,  1907  (1716). 
No  successful  culture  work  has  been  conducted  with  this  sub-epider- 
mal leaf  rust  on  this  host.  It  is  indisting^uishable  from  the  normal  form 
of  P.  tomipara  Trel.  on  Bromus  sp.  and  with  other  similar  forms  on 
various  grasses  described  under  a  variety  of  names  including  P.  oblit- 
erata  Arth.  on  Agropyron  sp.,  P,  alternans  Arth.  on  Bromus  sp.  and 
P.  cinerea  Arth.  on  Poa  sp.  Considerable  culture  work  has  been  done 
by  Arthur  showing  that  these  forms  have  aecia  on  Ranunculaceae  and 
are  probably  identical.  It  is  to  be  expected  that  aecia  for  leaf  rust  on 
Agropyron  repens  will  also  be  found  to  be  on  Ranunculaceae.  The  most 
probable  connection  is  with  Clematis. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


332 

35.  PucciNiA  Aletridis  B.  &  C.  Grevillea  3:52.    1874. 

On  Liliaceae: 

Aletris  farinosa  L.,  Newark,  April  7,  1892,  A.  Commons  (1924)  ; 

Townsend,  Oct.  9,  1896,  A.  Commons  (2785) ;  Selbyville,  Oct. 

3,  1907   (1756). 

The  specimen  from  Newark  collected  by  Commons  which  is  in  the 

Ellis  collection  at  the  New  York  Botanical  Garden  is  labeled  as  occuring 

on  Chamalerion.    The  host  is  clearly  Aletris. 

No  aecia  are  known  for  this  rather  rare  species  and  its  life  history 
is  in  doubt.  Only  three  other  collections  have  been  seen  by  the  writer 
from  Massachusetts,  Florida  and  Mississippi. 

36.  PucciNiA  Anemones- Virgin  IAN  AE  Schw.  Schrift.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig 

1:72.     1822. 
On  Ranunculaceae: 

Anemone  virginiana  L.,  Faulkland,  Aug.  13,  1886,  A.  Commons 
(293). 
The  above  collection  was  also  issued  in  Ellis  &  Ev.  N.  A.  Fungi  1847. 

37.  PUCCINIA  Andropogonis  Schw.  Trans.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  II,  4:295.  1834. 
Aecidium  Pentastemonis  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:68.     1822. 

On  Scrophulariaceae:    I. 

Melampyrum  linear e  Lam.    (M.  americanum  Michx.),  Seaford, 
June  4,  1908  (2051). 
On  Poaceae:    II,  III. 

Schizachyrium  scoparium  (Michx.)  Nash  (Andropogon  scopa^ 
rius  Michx.),  Lewes,  Nov.  16,  1907. 
This  species  on  Andropogon  was  first  cultured  by  Arthur  in  1899 
(Bot.  Gaz.  29:27.  1900)  who  succeeded  in  obtaining  infection  resulting 
in  aecia  on  Pentstemon  pubescens  using  telia  from  A.  scoparius  from 
Indiana.  In  1904  and  1906  the  same  author  (Jour.  Myc.  10:11.  1904; 
13:197.  1907)  using  telia  of  A.  scoparius  collected  in  Nebraska,  obtained 
infection  resulting  in  aecia  on  P.  hirsntus.  In  1910  (Mycol.  4:17.  1912) 
telia  from  A.  virginicus  from  W.  Virginia  were  successfully  cultured  on 
P,  hirsutus  and  from  A.  scoparius  from  Colorado  on  P.  alpinus.  In  1903 
Kellerman  (Jour.  Myc.  9:10.  1903)  verified  the  results  of  Arthur  by 
obtaining  successful  infection  on  P.  hirsutus  resulting  in  pycnia  follow- 
ing sowing  of  telia  from  A.  scoparius  collected  in  Indiana. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


333 

This  aecidium  on  Melampynim  included  here  is  known  on  this  host 
otherwise  only  from  Connecticut  and  Massachusetts.  It  somewhat  re- 
sembles A.  Melampyri  Kuntze  &  Schum.,  which  has  been  shown  by  Juel 
(Obv.  K.  Vet.  Akad.  Foch  1894.  503)  and  Klebahn  (Kulturv.  VIII  402) 
to  go  to  Puccinia  nemoralis  Juel  on  Molina  caerulea.  The  American 
aecia  differs  however  from  the  European  in  the  larger  thick  walled 
aeciospores  and  in  the  character  of  the  peridial  cells  and  since  no  telial 
form  referrable  to  the  European  species  has  yet  been  found  in  America 
it  is  probable  that  the  Aecidium  under  discussion  goes  to  some  American 
grass  or  sedge  rust.  It  is  scarcely  distinguishable  from  the  aecia  of 
P.  Andropogonis  Schw.  which  occur  on  other  Scrophulariaceae  in  the 
same  range  and  is  tentatively  referred  here  till  positive  cultures  are 
conducted. 

38.     Puccinia  angustata  Pk.  Bull.  Buff.  Soc.  Nat.  Hist.  1:67.    1873. 
Aecidium  lycapi  Ger.;  in  Peck  Bull.  Buff.  Soc.  Nat.  Hist.  1:68.   1873. 
On  Boraginaceae:    I. 

Lycopus  virginicus  L.,  Newark,  May  25,  1908,  (2236),  Seaford, 
June  4,  1908,  (2068). 
On  Cyperaceae:    II,  III. 

Sdrpiis  atrovirens  Muhl.  Newark,  Oct.  4,  1905,  (1635). 
Scirpus   cyperinus    (L.)    Kunth.,    Selbyville,    October    4,    1907, 

(1812). 
Scirpus  georgianus  Harper,   Newark,   September  1907,    (1818, 
1820). 
This  species  has  for  its  aecial  stage  Aecidium  lycopi  Ger.  on  Lycopus 
sp.  as  first  shown  by  Arthur  in   1899   (Bot.  Gaz.  29:273.     1900),  who 
succeeded  in  infecting  Scirpus  atrovirens  with  aeciospores  from  Lycopus 
americanus.    These  results  were  confirmed  in  1901,  1903,  1904,  1906  and 
1907  (Jour.  Myc.  8:53.    1902;  11:58.    1905;  13:196.    1907;  14:14.    1908) 
by  sowing  teliospores   from   Scirpus   atrovirens  on  leaves  of  Lycopus 
americanu^  resulting  in  each  case  in  the  development  of  aecia.     Keller- 
man  in  1903   (Jour.  Myc.  9:226.     1903)  confirms  Arthur's  results  using 
the  same  hosts,  collecting  his  telial  material  in  Ohio.     In  1908   (Mycol. 
1:234.     1909)  Arthur  infected  Lycopus  communis  and  L.  americanus  by 
sowing  with  teliospores  from  Scirpus  cyperinus.    In  1910  (Mycol.  4:17. 
1912)  the  results  of  1901-1907  were  confirmed  and  in  1911  (Mycol.  4:54. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


334 

1912)  the  results  of  1908  were  confirmed  in  part.  In  1912  (Mycol  7:70. 
1915)  infection  resulting  in  the.  development  of  aecia  was  again  obtained 
on  L.  americanus  using  telial  material  on  5.  atrovirens  from  Indiana  and 
Ontario. 

39.  PucciNiA  Anthoxanthi  Fckl.  Symb.  Myc.  Nachtr.  2:15.     1873. 

On  Poaceae: 

Anthoxanthum  odoratum  L.,  Newark,  June  1908,  (2244). 

40.  PucciNiA  ASPARAGI  DC.  Flora  Fr.  2:595.     1805. 

On  Con vallariaceae  : 

Asparagus  officinalis  L.,  Hare's  Comers,  October  1896,  F.  D. 
Chester;  Smyrna,  October  1904,  C.  0.  Smith;  Lewes,  Aug.  14, 
1907,  (1681). 
A  discussion  of  the  economic  importance  of  this  rust  in  Delaware 
will  be  found  in  Delaware  Experiment  Station  bulletins  57  and  63. 

Sheldon  (Science  N.  S.  16:235.  1902)  shows  that  this  species  is 
autoecious  and  that  the  urediniospores  may  carry  the  fungus  over  the 
winter.  He  also  claims  to  have  successfully  infected  Allium  cepa,  all 
three  stages  having  been  produced  on  that  host. 

41.  PUCCINIA  ASPERiFOLii   (Pers.)   Wettst.  Verb.  Zool.-Bot.  Ges.  Wein. 

35:541.     1885. 

Pucdnia  dispersa  Erikss.  Zeitsch.  f.  Pflanzkr.  4:257.     1894. 

Aecidium  asperifolii  Pers.  Obs.  Myc.  1:97.     1896. 
On  Poaceae: 

Secale  cereale  L.,  Newark,  May  25,  1908,  (2263). 

DeBary  (Monatsber.  K.  Akad.  d.  Wiss.  Berlin  211.  1866)  was  the 
first  to  show  the  connection  between  the  leaf  rust  of  rye  and  Aecidium 
asperifolii  Pers.  by  sowing  sporidia  on  Anchusa  officinalis  L.  and  on 
Lycopsis  arvensis,  pycnia  and  aecia  resulting.  Uredinia  and  telia  were 
obtained  on  rye  following  sowing  of  aeciospores  from  the  above  men- 
tioned aecial  hosts. 

In  America,  Arthur  (Mycol.  1:236.  1909)  records  successful  infec- 
tion experiments  resulting  in  the  production  of  pycnia  on  Lycopsis  ar- 
vensis  L.  following  sowings  of  sporidia  from  Secale  cereale  L.  The  Ly- 
copsis plants  were  grown  from  seed  secured  in  Europe.  These  cultures 
prove  that  the  leaf  rust  of  lye  in  Europe  and  America  is  identical. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


335 

42.  PucciNiA  AsTERis  Duby,  Bot.  Gall.  2:888.     1830. 

On  Carduaceae: 

Aster  paniculatus  Lam.,  Newark,  September  1905,  (1636)  ;  Sep- 
tember 10,  1907,   (1728). 
Aster  salicifolius  Lam.,  Newark,  September  10,  1907,  (1728). 

43.  PUCCINIA  ASTERUM   (Schw.)  Kern,  Mycol.  9:224.     1917. 
Aecidium  asterum  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:67.     1822. 
Puccinia  extensicola  Plowr.  British  Ured.  &  "Ust.  181.     1889. 
Puccinia  vulpinoidis  Diet.  &  Holw.;  Dietel,  Bot.  Gaz.  19:304.     1894. 
Puccinia  Caricis-Erigerontis  Arth.  Jour.  Myc.  8:53.    1902. 
Pticcinia  Caricis-Asteris  Arth.  Jour.  Myc.  8:64.     1902. 

Puccinia  Caricis-Solidaginis  Arth.  Bot.  Gaz.  35:21.     1903. 
Puccinia  Dulichii  Syd.  Monog.  Ured.  1:684.    1903. 
On  Carduaceae:    I. 

Erigeron  annuus  (L.)  Pers.,  Newark,  June  1907,  (1669). 
Euthamia  graminifolia  (L.)  Nutt.,  Seaford,  June  4,  1908,  (2043, 

2065). 
Solidago  altissima  L.,  June  5,  1908,  (2076). 
Solidago  rugosa  Mill.,  Seaford,  June  9,  1907,  (2013,  2014). 
Solidago  sempervirens  L.,  Seaford,  June  4,  1908,  (2086). 
On  Cyperaceae:    II,  III. 

Carex  albolutescens  Schw.,  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,  (1808,  1809). 
Carex  festucacea  Willd.,  Seaford,  Nov.  15,  1907,  (1759). 
Carex  Leersii  Willd.,  Seaford,  June  4,  1908,  (2057a,  2061b). 
Carex  Muhlenhergii  Schk.,  Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907,   (1699). 
Carex  radiata  (Wahl)   Small,  Newark,  Sept.  1907,  (1826). 
Carex  rosea  Schk.,  Seaford,  June  4,  1908,  (2062a). 
Carex  stipata  Muhl.,  Newark,  Sept.  1907,   (1821,  1827). 
Carex  straminea  Willd.,  Seaford,  Nov.  14,  1907,  (1770),  Nov.  15, 

1907,  (1859). 
Carex  vulpinoidea  Michx.,  Lewes,  Aug.  16,  1907,  (1678) ;  June  7, 
'  1908,  (2087) ;  Collins  Beach,  Oct.  1,  1907,  (1783) ;  Newark, 
Aug.  23,  1907,  (1717,  1725),  Sept.  1907,  (1733),  April  5,  1908, 
AprU  11,  1908,  Felton,  Sept.  5,  1907,  (1740,  1741);  Seaford, 
April  23,  1908,  (2032),  June  4,  1908,   (2077,  2080,  2081). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


336 

Dulichium  arundinaceum  (L.)  Britt.,  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907, 
(1803,  Barth.  Fungi  Columb.  2662) ;  Seaford,  Nov.  14,  1907, 
(1761). 

In  1901  Arthur  (Jour.  Myc.  8:54.  1902)  first  began  culture  work 
showing  that  aecia  which  occur  commonly  on  Aster,  Solidago  and  related 
hosts  are  genetically  connected  with  uredinia  and  telia  on  various  species 
of  Carex.  The  culture  work  conducted  by  Arthur  is  extensive  and 
extends  over  a  period  of  years  from  1901-1914.  In  this  series  of  culture 
work  aecia  have  been 'produced  on  various  species  of  Aster,  Solidago, 
Erigeron,  Leptilon  and  Euthamia,  using  telia  from  many  species  of 
Carex  from  various  parts  of  North  America  and  from  Dulichium.  (Jour. 
Myc.  8:54.  1902;  11:58.  1905;  12:15;  1906;  14:13.  1908;  Bot.  Gaz. 
35:15,  21.  1903;  Mycol.  1:233.  1909;  2:224.  1910;  4:15,  16.  1912; 
7:70,81.  1915).  Eraser  in  1911  (Mycol  4:181.  1912)  confirms  Arthur's 
results  in  part  by  successfully  infecting  Aster  acuminatus  using  telial 
material  from  Carex  trisperma. 

This  study  has  also  shown  that  the  species  as  here  considered  is  a 
composite  form  made  up  of  several  distinct  physiological  races. 

The  species  is  separable  from  all  other  American  species  of  Puccinia 
on  Carex  by  the  presence  of  two  pores  in  the  upper  part  of  the  rather 
small  (12-19  by  16-23ii)  uredospores,  and  the  medium  sized  (12-20  by 
35-50ii)    teliospores. 

44.  Puccinia  Batesiana  Arth.  Bull.  Torrey  Club  28:661.    1901. 

On  Carduaceae: 

Heliopsis  helianthoides    (L.)    B.   S.   P.,  Newark,  Oct.   4,   1905, 
(1510). 
This  species  has  not  been  recorded  otherwise  on  this  host  but  has 
been  collected  in   Iowa,  Minnesota  and   Nebraska  on  Heliopsis  scabra 
Dunal. 

45.  Puccinia  Vernoniae  Schw.  Proc.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  II.  4:296.    1832. 
Puccinia  bullata  Schw.  Schrift.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:74.    1822. 

On  Carduaceae: 

Vemonia  noveboracensis    (L.)    Willd.,  Clayton,  July  24,   1907, 
(1707). 
This   very   common   species   is   apparently   confined   to   the   United 
States  and  is  the  only  one  so  far  recorded  north  of  Mexico.     The  name 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


337 

first  proposed  by  Schweinitz  was  based  on  collections  made  at  Salem, 
North  Carolina,  occurring  "erumpent  from  the  dried  stems  of  various 
plants,  e.  g.  Ambrosia,  Chenopodium."  In  his  later  publication  he  cites 
it  as  occurring  in  Pennsylvania  on  V.  noveboracensis.  An  examination 
of  the  material  in  the  Schweinitz  collection  at  the  Philadelphia  Academy 
of  Science,  made  by  Dr.  J.  C.  Arthur,  shows  that  there  are  three  packets, 
containing  in  the  aggregate  9  pieces,  of  similar  stems  bearing  large  sori 
up  to  3  cm,  long.  The  original  packet  reads  "P  bullata  LvS.  Salem  & 
Beth,  in  caulibus  varies.''  The  stems  all  appear  to  be  of  Vernonia  and 
the  rust  whep  examined  microscopically  does  not  differ  from  similar 
material  on  Vernonia  stems  (now  interpreted  as  V.  altisshna)  collected 
by  L.  M.  Underwood  at  Fern,  Putnam  Co.,  Indiana,  and  distributed  in 
Ellis  &  Ev.  N.  A.  Fungi  2988  and  other  exsiccati  under  the  name  P, 
Vemoniae  Schw.  No  other  rust  with  which  this  could  possibly  be  con- 
fused is  known  to  occur  on  the  stems  of  Ambrosia  or  Chenopodium,  or 
on  any  other  host  within  the  range  of  this  species. 

That  the  rust  on  the  stems  is  the  same  as  the  more  common,  or  at 
least  more  frequently  collected,  form  on  the  leaves  has  been  shown  by 
Dr.  Arthur  who,  in  1916,  using  telial  material  from  the  stems  of  Ver- 
nonia sp.  collected  by  C.  H.  Crabill  at  CliflFview,  Va.,  and  communicated 
by  Dr.  F.  D.  Fromme,  succeeded  in  obtaining  the  development  of  pycnia 
and  uredinia  on  the  leaves  of  Vernonia  sp.  This  culture  also  demon- 
strates that  this  rust,  whose  life  history  has  long  been  in  doubt,  is  a 
brachy-form  referrable  to  the  genus  Bullaria.  Pycnia  have  not  been 
observed  in  any  field  collections  thus  far  studied. 

46.     Puccini  A    canaliculata    (Schw.)    Lagerh.    Tromso    Mus.    Aarsh. 
17:51.     1894. 
Sphaeria  canaliailata  Schw.  Trans.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  11,  4:209.     1832. 
Aecidium  compositarum  Xanthii  Burr.;  DeToni  in  Sacc.  Syll.  Fung. 
7:799.     1888. 

On  Carduaceae:    I. 

Xanthhim  echinatum  Murr.,  Seaford,  June  4,  1908,   (2049). 
On  Cyperaceae:    II,  III. 

Cyperus  esailentus  L.,  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,  (1794). 
Cyperus  filiculmis  Vahl.,  Felton,  Sept.  5,  1907,  (1742). 
Cyperiis  lancastnensvi  Porter,  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,   (1813). 

22—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


338 

Cyperus  ovularis  (Michx.)  Torr.,  Felton,  Sept.  5,  1907,  (1744); 

Newark,  Oct.  20,  1907,  (2258). 
Cyperus  refractus  Engelm.,  Newark,  Aug.  23,  1907,  (1718). 
Cyperus  strigosus   L.,   Felton,  July   30,   1906,    (1618);   Lewes, 

Aug.  14,  1907,  (1693). 
Cyperus  Torreyi  Britton  (C  cylindricus  (Ell.)  Britton),  Selby- 
ville,  Oct.  4,  1^07,  (1810). 
Arthur  (Jour.  Myc.  12:23.     1906)  conducted  culture  experiments  in 
1905  which  showed  that  an  aecidium  on  Xanthium  canadense  is  con- 
nected with  this  species  on  various  species  of  Cyperus.     Following  sow- 
ings of  aeciospores  from  X.  canadense,  collected  in  Indiana,  uredinio- 
spores  developed  on  C  esculentus. 

47.  PucciNiA  Caricis-strictae  Dietel,  Hedw.  28:23.    1889. 
Uromyces  Caricis  Pk.  Ann.  Rep.  N.  Y.  State  Mus.  24:90.     1872. 

On  Cyperaceae:    II,  III. 

Carex  stricta  Lam.,  Seaford,  Nov.  14,  1907,   (1757,  1762,  1763, 
1764,  1765,  1766). 

48.  PucciNiA  Chrysanthemi  Roze,  Bull.  Soc.  Myc.  Fr.  17:92.     1900. 

On  Carduaceae: 

Chrysanthemum    sinense    Sabine,    Camden,    September    1905, 
(1536) ;   Wyoming,  November  1907. 
This  rust  causes  considerable  damage  to  cultivated  chrysanthemums. 
The  life  history  is  somewhat  in  doubt.     In  America  the  rust  exists  only 
in  the  uredinial  stage. 

49.  PUCCINIA  CiRSii  Lasch.  in  Rab.  Fungi  Eur.  89.     1859. 

On  Carduaceae: 

Carduu^  altissimus  L.,  Faulkland,  Oct.  20,  1886,  A.  Commons, 
459;  August  1887,  A.  Commons,  137. 
The  latter  specimen  was  issued  in  E.  &  E.  N.  A.  Fungi  2253  as 
P.  compositarum  Schlecht,  f.  Cnid  altissimL  This  is  a  brachy-Puccinia 
developing  pycnia  with  the  uredinia  and  occurs  most  commonly  on  the 
under  surface  of  the  leaves.  It  occurs  throughout  the  United  States  on 
species  of  Carduus  other  than  C.  lanceolatus. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


339 

50.  PucciNiA  CLAYTONIATA  (Schw.)  Peck,  Bull.  N.  Y.  state  Miis.  6:226. 

1899. 
Caeoma  (Aecidium)  claytoniatum  Schw.  Tran.  Am.   Phil.  Soc.   II. 
4:294.     1832. 

Puccinia  MaHae-Wilsoni  G.  W.  Clinton,  Bull.  Buff.  Soq.  Nat.  Sci. 
1:166.     1873. 

Allodus  claytoniata  Arth.  Result.  Sci.  Congr.  Bot.  Vienna  345.    1906. 
On  Portulacaceae: 

Claytonia  virginica  L.,  Newark,  May  2,  1907,  I,  (1578) ;  May  29, 
1907,  III,  (1658);  April  19,  1908,  I,  (2241); 
Orton  (Mem.  N.  Y.  Bot.  Gard.  6:177.  1916)  is  the  authority  for 
the  statement  that  this  species  has  been  cultured  by  Fromme.  He  sowed 
aeciospores  from  primary  aecia  on  the  same  host  and  obtained  the 
development  of  telia  of  the  scattered  type  indicating  that  repeating 
aecia  do  not  occur  in  this  species.  An  examination  of  specimens  in  the 
Arthur  herbarium  has  failed  to  reveal  any  collection  of  aecia  not  accom- 
panied by  pycnia. 

51.  Puccinia  Cnici  Mart.  Fl.  Mosq.  226.     1817. 

Puccinia  Cirsii-lanceolati  Schroet.  Pilze  Schles.  1:317.     1887. 
On  Carduaceae: 

Carduus  lanceolatus  L.,  Newark,  October  1907,   (2009). 
This  species  produces  aecia  of  a  peculiar  character  having  a  rudi- 
mentary aecidium.    All  stages  occur  most  abundantly  on  the  upper  sur- 
faces of  the  leaves. 

Kellerman  (Jour.  Myc.  9:229.  1903)  has  shown  through  carefully 
conducted  culture  experiments  that  this  species  is  an  eu-Puccinia  and 
autoecious.    In  America  it  is  known  only  on  the  above  host. 

52.  Puccinia  Convolvulvi  (Pers.)  Cast.  Obs.  Myc.  1:16.    1842. 
Uredo  Betae  Convolvidi  Pers.  Syn.  Fung.  221.     1801. 

On  Convolvulaceae  : 

Convolvulus  sepium  L.,  Wilmington,  Aug.  17,  1886,  III,  A.  Com- 
mons  (302);  Lewes,  April  1908,  I,   (2260). 
The  collection  by  Commons  was  issued  in  E.  &  E.  N.  Am.  Fungi 
1857  as  on  Ipomoea  pandurata  (L.)   Meyer.     The  host  is  certainly  Con- 
volvulus.   Arthur  (Bot.  Gaz.  29:270.     1900)  has  shown  that  this  species 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


340 

is  autoecious.  Teliospores  from  C,  sejnuvi  were  sown  in  the  greenhouse 
on  the  same  host  with  subsequent  abundant  development  of  pycnia  and 
aecia. 

53.  PucciNiA  Cryptotaeniae  Pk.  Rep.  N.  Y.  State  Mus.  25:114.    1873. 

On  Ammiaceae: 

Deringia  canadensis   (L.)    Kuntze,  Wilmington,  Nov.  14,  1888, 
A.  Commons   (909);  Newark,  May  1907,   (1667). 
This  is   a  micro-Puccinia  correlated  with  Puccinia  microica  Ellis 
which  is  an  opsis  form.    The  latter  was  originally  reported  as  occurring 
on  Sanicula  sp.,  which  was  an  error  for  Deringia  canadensis, 

54.  Puccinia  Cyani   (Schleich.)   Pass.  Rabh.  Fungi  Eur.  1767.     1874. 
Uredo  Cyani  Schleich.  PI.  Helv.  95. 

On  Carduaceae: 

Centaurea  cyanus  L.,  Newark,  May  20,  1913,  C.  O.  Houghton. 

55.  Puccinia  Eatoniae  Arth.  Jour.  Myc.  10:18.    1904. 

Aecidium  Ranunculi   Schw.    Schr.    Nat.   Ges.    Leipzig   1:67.      1822. 
(Not  A.  Ranunculi  Schum.     1803.) 
On  Ranunculaceae:    I. 

Ranunculus  abortivus  L.,  Newark,  May  1,  1905,  C.  O.  Smith. 
Issued  as  A.   Ranunculi   Schw.   in   E.   &   E.   Fungi   Columb. 
2107.     Newark,  May  1,  1908,   (2238). 
On  Poaceae:    II,  III. 

Sphenopholis  pallen^   (Spreng.)   Schrib.,  Newark,  May  1,  1908, 

II,   (2237),  June  1,  1908,  III    (2234,  2239). 
Sphenopholis   nitida    (Spreng.)     Schrib.,    Newark,    June    1908, 
(2269). 
Arthur  in  Jour.  Myc.  10:18.     1904,  shows  by  culture  that  Aecidium 
Ranunculi  Schw.  has  its  telial  stage  on  Sphenopholis  pallens   (Eatonia 
pennsylvanica   (DC.)    A.  Gray),  having  obtained  infection  on  E.  penn- 
sylvanica  resulting  in   uredinia   by   inoculation  with   aeciospores   from 
Ranunculus  abortitnis.     Field  observations  made  by  the  writer  in  con- 
nection with  the  collections  listed  above  lend  confirming  evidence  to  the 
cultural  results  by  Dr.  Arthur.    On  May  1  the  writer  collected  Aecidium 
Ranunculi  Schw.   (2238).     Almost  in  contact  were  found  the  leaves  of 
grass  at  that  time  not  yet  fruiting,  bearing  fresh  uredinia  (2237).    The 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


341 

over-wintering  leaves  of  this  grsiss  were  found  to  bear  telia.  On  June  1 
at  the  same  place  this  grass  was  found  in  fruiting  condition  bearing 
fresh  telia  (2239).  The  grass  proved  to  be  Eatonia  pallens.  Examina- 
tion showed  the  rust  to  be  that  described  by  Arthur  on  P,  Eatoniae, 

56.  PucciNiA  Eleocharidis  Arth.  Bull.  Iowa  Agr.  College  Nov.  156. 

1884. 
Aecidium   compositarum   Eupatorii    DeToni    in    Sacc.    Syll.    Fung. 
7:798.     1888. 

On  Carduaceae:    I. 

Eupatorium  perfoliatum  L.,  Seaford,  June  4,  1908,  (2054,  2061a, 

2074,  2079). 
Eupatorium  purpureum  L.,  Seaford,  June  4,  1908,  '(2058b,  2060, 

2062b,  2067,  2072). 
Eupatorium  rotundi folium   L.,   Seaford,   June   4,   1908,    (2055, 
2069). 
Arthur  conducted  culture  experiments  in  1905   (Jour.  Myc.  12:23. 
1906)   showing  that  an  aecidium  resembling  in  eveiy  way  the  common 
one  on  Eupatorium  species  could  be  induced  by  sowings  with  teliospores 
from  Eleocharis.    He  used  teliospores  on  Eleocharis  palustris  from  Wis- 
consin to  successfully  infect  Eupatorium  perfoliatum,  with  subsequent 
development  of  aecia — two  trials.    These  results  were  confirmed  in  1906 
and  1908  by  the  same  author  (Jour.  Myc.  13:197.     1907;  Mycol.  1:233. 
1909)    when  typical   aecia  were   produced  on  Eupatorium  perfoliatum 
following  infection  by  teliospores  from  E,  palustris  collected  in  Kansas 
and  Indiana. 

57.  PUCCINIA  Ellisiana  Thiim.  Bull.  Torrey  Club  6:215.     1878. 
Pucdnia  aTtiericana  Lagerh.  Tromso  Mus.  Aarsh.  17:45.     1895. 

On  Poaceae:    II,  III. 

Andropogon  scoparius  Mchx.,  Newark,  Oct.  1907  (1830) ;  March 
30,  1908,   (2246). 
This  species  has  been  separated  from  P.  Andropogonis  by  the  pos- 
session of  thick  walled  verrucose  uredospores. 

Long  (Phjrtopath.  2:164.  1912)  carried  on  successful  experiments 
with  this  species  in  1910,  1911,  and  1912  reporting  successful  infection 
of  Viola  fimbriatula,  V.  hirsutula,  V.  sagittata,  V,  papilionacea,  with 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


342 

development  of  aecia  following  sowings  of  teliospores  from  A.  virginicus, 
Uredinia  were  produced  on  Andropogon  when  aecia  were  used  for  in- 
fection. 

Arthur  in  1912  (Mycol.  7:71.  1915)  using  telia  from  Andropogon 
sp.  from  North  Dakota  obtained  the  development  of  aecia  on  V.  cucullata 
and  V,  Nut t aim. 

In  a  later  paper  Long  (Jour.  Agr.  Res.  2:303-319.  1914)  presents 
the  results  of  an  extensive  research  dealing  with  this  species  and  P. 
Andropogonis  Schw.  in  which  he  claims  to  prove  "that  the  ordinary 
Pentstemon  rust  P.  Andropogonis,  can  be  produced  from  the  Viola  rust 
P.  Ellisiana,  by  simply  passing  the  Viola  rust  through  Pentstemon  as 
an  aecial  host."  Numerous  culture  experiments  were  conducted  in  sup- 
port of  the  above  conclusion. 

58.  PucciNiA  EMACULATA  Schw.  Trans.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  II,  4:295.    1834. 

On  Poaceae: 

Panicum  capillare  L.,  Newark,  Sept.  15,  1905,  (1615) ;  Felton, 
Sept.  5,  1907,  (1750). 
Successful  cultures  have  never  been  conducted  with  this  common 
rust  though  many  attempts  have  been  made.  Morphologically  it  is  very 
like  P.  Pammelii  (Trel.)  Arth.  (P.  Panici  Diet.)  and  perhaps  should  be 
united  with  it.  On  account  of  the  resemblance  to  that  species  the  aecia 
should  be  looked  for  on  Euphorbiaceous  hosts.  It  is  convenient,  however, 
to  retain  it  as  a  separate  form  till  cultures  establishing  its  relationship 
have  been  successfully  carried  out. 

59.  PucciNiA  EPIPHYLLA    (L.)    Wettst.  in  Verb.  Zool.-Bot.   Ges.   Wien 

35:541.     1886. 
Lycoperdon  ejnphylliim  L.  Sp.  PI.  1653.     1753. 
Aecidium  Tussilaginis  Pers.  in  Gmel.  Syst.  Nat.  2:1473.     1791. 
Pucdnia  poarum  Nielsen  Bot.  Tidsskr.  Ill,  2:34.     1877. 
On  Poaceae:    II. 

Poa  annua  L.,  Newark,  June  1908,  (2245). 

Poa  pratensis  L.,  Seaford,  June  4,  1908,  (2053a,  2042)  ;  Newark, 

June  1908,   (2268). 

Nielsen  was  the  first  to  show  the  relation  betweeij  this  rust  and 

Aecidium  Tussilaginis.    He  succeeded  in  infecting  P.  annua,  P.  trivialis, 

P.  nemoralis,  P.  fertilis  and  P.  pratensis  by  sowing  aeciospores  from 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


343 

Tussilago  farfara.     He  infected  the  fecial  host  by  sowing  with  telio- 
spores  from  P.  annua. 

Additional  observations  and  culture  work  have  been  recorded  by 
various  European  authors,  which  has  been  summarized  by  Klebahn  (Die 
Wirtw.  Rostpilze  290.     1904). 

60.  PucciNiA  Fraxinata  (Lk.)  Arth.  Bot.  Gaz.  34:6.     1902. 
Aecidium  Fraxini  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:66.     1822.     (Not 

A.  Fraxini  Kom.) 

Caeoma  Fraxinatum  Lk.  in  Willd.  Sp.  PI.  6':62.     1825. 
Puccinia  Sparganioides  Ellis  &  Barth.  Erythea  4:2.     1896. 
On  Oleaceae:    L 

Fraxinus  lanceolata  Borck.,  Newark,  1897,  F.  D.  Chester,  June 
17,  1907,  (1663);  May  1908:    (2240). 
On  Poaceae:    IIL 
Spartina  cynosuroides  (L.)   Roth  (S.  polystachya  Ell.),  Collins 

Beach,  Oct.  1,  1907,  (1784). 
Spartina  stricta  (Ait.)  Roth  (S.  glabra  Muhl.),  Lewes,  Nov.  16, 
1907,   (1772,  1773,  1849,  1850a,  1851);  Collins  Beach,  Oct.  1, 
1907,   (1785,  1786). 
The  Aecidium  on  Fraxinus  known  as  A.  Fraxini  Schw.  was  first 
shown  by  Arthur   (Bot.  Gaz.  29:275.     1900)   to  have  telia  on  Spartina 
cynosuroides.     He  obtained  the  development  of  aecia  on  F.  viridis  fol- 
lowing sowings  of  telial  material  from  Iowa  and  Nebraska.     In  1904, 
1905,  1907  and  1909  (Jour.  Myc.  11:57.    1905;  12:16.   1906;  14:14.    1908; 
Mycol.  2:225.    1910)  similar  results  were  obtained  on  F.  lanceolata  using 
telia  from  Iowa,  Kansas,  Nebraska  and  North  Dakota. 

In  1908  the  writer  sent  telial  material  collected  at  Lewes  on  S.  cyn- 
osuroides and  S,  stricta  to  Dr.  Arthur  for  culture  work.  Successful 
infection  of  F.  lanceolata  with  development  of  aecia  was  obtained  from 
cultures  with  telia  from  both  hosts. 

61.  Puccinia  Heuanthi-mollis  (Schw.)  Jackson,  Brooklyn  Bot.  Gard. 

Mem.  1:250.     1918. 
Aecidium  Helianthi-nwllis  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1 :68.   1822. 
Puccinia  Helianthi  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:73.    1822. 
On  Carduaceae: 

Helianthus  annuus  L.,  Newark,  Sept.  1907,    (2006). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


344 

Heliantkus  angustifolius  L.,  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,  (1993). 

Helianthus  decapetalus  L.,  Newark,  Sept.  7,  1905,  (1553,  1624), 
Aug.  23,  1907,  (1724). 
Carleton  (Science  13:250.  1901)  was  the  first  in  America  to  record 
culture  experiments  shov^ing  that  the  species  is  autoecious.  These  results 
were  confirmed  by  Arthur  (Bot.  Gaz.  35:17.  1903)  whose  work  indi- 
cates, however,  that  there  may  be  biological  races.  Further  evidence  of 
this  was  obtained  in  1903  (Jour.  Myc.  10:12.  1904)  and  in  1904  (Jour. 
Myc.  11:53.  1905),  on  further  evidence,  the  conclusion  is  made  that 
"P.  Helianthi  Schw.  is  a  single  species  having  many  races,  for  which 
H,  annnus  acts  as  a  bridging  host."  Further  cultural  results  were  re- 
corded in  Jour.  Myc.  12:18.     1906. 

62.     PucciNiA  HiBiSCiATUM    (Schw.)   Kellerm.  Jour.  Myc.  9:110.     1903. 
Caeoma  Hibisciatum  Schw.  Trans.  Am.  Phil    Soc.  11,  4:293.     1834. 
Aecidhim  Napaeae  Arth.  &  Holw.;  Arthur  in  Bull.  Iowa  Agr.  Coll. 
1884:166.     1885. 

Aecidium  Callirrhoes  Ell.  &  Kellerm.  Jour.  Myc.  2:4.     1886. 
Puccinia  Muhlenbergiae  Arth.  &  Holw.  Bull.  Lab.  Nat.  Hist.  Univ. 
Iowa  5:317.    1902. 

Puccinia  tosta  Arth.  Bull.  Torrey  Club  29:228.     1902. 
On  Poaceae:    H,  III. 

Muhlenbergia  sobalifera    (Muhl.)    Trin., — Wilmington,  Oct.  26, 

1891,  A.  Commons   (1867). 
Muhlenbergia  Schreberi  Gmel.    (M.   diffusa  Willd.), — Newark, 
Sept.  1907,   (1817,  1828). 
Kellerman   (Jour.  Myc.  9:110,  232.     1903)  was  the  first  to  conduct 
successful  culture  experiments  leading  to  an  understanding  of  the  life 
history  of  this  species.     An  extensive  series  of  inoculations  with  telial 
material  on  Muhlenbergia  mexicana  from  Ohio,  in  which  many  Malva- 
ceous  hosts  were  used,  resulted  in  obtaining  successful  infection  of  Hi- 
biscus mocheutos  and  H.  militaris  with  production  of  typical  aecia  of 
A.  Hibisciatum  Schw. 

Arthur  in  1908  (Mycol.  1:251.  1909)  first  showed  that  this  species 
also  has  for  its  aecial  stage.  A,  Napaeae  A.  &  H.  Infection  of  Callirrhoe 
invohicrata,  resulting  in  aecia,  was  obtained  following  sowings  of  telio- 
spores  from  M,  mexicana  from  Kansas.     These  results  were  confirmed 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


345 

in  1909  (Mycol.  2:226.  1910)  using  telial  material  on  M,  glomerata 
from  Kansas  and  in  1910  (MycoL  4:18.  1912)  successful  infection  fol- 
lowed sowings  with  teliospores  from  M.  racemosa  collected  in  North 
Dakota. 

In  1914  (Mycol.  7:80.  1915)  Arthur  also  showed  that  Puccinia  tosta 
on  SporoboltLs  asperifolius  has  for  its  aecial  stage,  Aecidium  Sphaeral- 
ceae.  Successful  infection  of  Sphaeralcea  incana  was  obtained  following 
sowings  of  telial  material  from  New  Mexico.  Infection  of  S.  lobata  was 
also  obtained  when  telial  material  from  Texas  was  used.  A  comparison 
of  the  aecia  and  of  the  telia  showed  P.  tosta  to  be  inseparable  from  the 
form  of  Muhlenbergia. 

63.  Puccinia  Hieracii  (Schum.)   Mart.  Flora  Mosq.  226.     1817. 
Uredo  Hieracii  Schum.  Enum.  Plant.  Saell.  2:232.     1803. 

On  Cichoriaceae: 

Hiera^num  scahrum  Michx.,   Newark,    Sept.    5,   1905,    (1623) ; 
Lewes,  April  25,  1908,    (2035). 

64.  Puccinia  Impatientis  (Schw.)  Arth.  Bot.  Gaz.  35:19.    1903. 
Aecidium  Impatientis  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:67.     1822. 
Puccinia  perminuta  Arth.  Bull.  Torrey  Club  34:584.     1907. 

On  Balsaminaceae:    I. 

Impatiens  aurea  Muhl.,  Newark,  June  17,  1907,  (1664). 
On  Poaceae:    II,  III. 

Agrostis   hyemalis    (Walt.)    B.    S.    P.,   Seaford,  June   4,   1908, 

(2045). 
Agrostis  perrenans    (Walt.)    Tuckerm.  Woodland  Beach,  Aug. 

1890,  J.  H.  Holmes  (Phan.  spec.  312). 
Elymus  canadensis  L.,  Newark,  Aug.  23,  1907,  II,  (1722). 
Arthur  has  shown  that  Aecidium  Impatientis  Schw.  is  connected 
with  a  telial  form  on  Elymus  virginicas  L.  which  previously  had  been 
called  P.  rubigo-vera  (Bot.  Gaz.  35:18.  1903).  He  obtained  the  develop- 
ment of  aecia  on  Impatiens  aurea  following  inoculation  with  germinat- 
ing teliospores  on  Elymus  virginicus  from  Indiana.  Further  cultures 
made  in  1903  and  1904  (Jour.  Myc.  10:11.  1904;  11:57.  1905)  gave 
identical  results  when  telial  material  from  Indiana  and  Wisconsin  were 
used  for  inoculation.  In  1909  (Mycol.  2:226.  1910)  teliospores  from 
Elymus  striatum  were  used  by  Arthur  to  successfully  inoculate  Impatiens 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


346 

aurea,  Uredinia  were  also  obtained  on  E,  virginicuSf  E,  canadensis, 
and  E.  striatus  following  infection  with  aeciospores  from  Impatiens 
aurea. 

65.  PUCCINIA  IRIDIS  (DC.)  Wallr.  Rabh.  Krypt.  Fl.  Ed.  1,  1:23.     1844. 

Uredo  Iridis  DC.  Encycl.  8:224.     1808. 
On  Iridaceae: 

Iris  versicolor  L.,  Newark,  July  24,  1906,   (1565). 
The  life  history  of  this  common  rust  is  still  in  doubt,  only  uredinia 
and  telia  are  known. 

66.  PUCCINIA  LOBELIAE  Ger.  Bull.  Buffalo  Soc.  Nat.  Sci.  1:68.     1873. 

On  Campanulaceae: 

Lobelia  puberula  Michx.,  Wilmington,  Sept.  1893,  A.  Conmions, 

(issued  also  in  E.  &  E.  Fungi  Columb.  261) ;  Newark,  Sept. 

8,  1893,  A.  Commons,   (2213). 
Lobelia  syphilitica  L.,  Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907,    (1696),  August, 

1907,   (2242). 

67.  PUCCINIA  LYSIMACHIATA    (Link)   Kern,  Mycol.  9:215.     1917. 
Aecidium  Lysimachiae  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:67.     1822. 
Caeoma  lysimachiatum  Link,  in  Willd.  Sp.  PI.  6':  45.     1825. 
Puccinia  Limosae  Magn.  Amtl.  Ber.  Vers.  Deutsch.  Naturf.  u.  Aerzte 

1877:200.     1877. 

On  Primulaceae:    L 

Lysimachia  terrestris  (L.)  B.  S.  P.,  Seaford,  June  5,  1908, 
(2084). 
Klebahn  (Jahr.  Wiss.  Bot.  34:396.  1910)  has  shown  that  the  Euro- 
pean A.  Lysimachiae  Schlecht.  is  genetically  connected  with  P.  Limosae 
Magn.  He  succeeded  in  obtaining  infection  resulting  in  the  development 
of  urediniospores  on  Carex  limosa  following  sowings  with  aeciospores 
from  Lysimachia  thyrsi  flora  and  L.  xmlgaris.  No  cultures  have  been 
conducted  in  America,  but  since  no  essential  morphological  difference 
can  be  detected  in  the  aecia  and  several  collections  on  Carex  have  been 
recognized  by  Arthur  which  agree  with  European  material  referred  to 
P.  LimosaCf  there  seems  to  be  no  good  reason  for  considering  the  Amer- 
ican form  distinct  from  the  European. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


347 

68.  PucciNiA  MACROSPORA   (Pkl)   Arth.  Mycol.  1:244.     1909. 
Aecidium  macrosporum  Pk.  Ann.  Rep.  N.  Y.  State  Mus.  23:61.   1873. 

On  Smilaceae:    I. 

Smilax  rotundifolia  Seaford,  July  9,  1907,  (1651);  Lewes,  Aug. 
14,  1907;  June  6,  1908,  (2089);  Townsend,  June  11,  1890;  A. 
Commons  (1437) ;  Newark,  July  1891,  A.  Commons  (Distrib- 
uted in  E.  &  E.  N.  A.  Fungi  2708). 
On  Cyperaceae:    II,  III. 

Carex  comosa  Boott,  Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907,  II,  (1686),  Nov.  16, 
1907,  III,  (18B3). 
As  noted  above,  on  Aug.  14,  1907,  the  writer  collected  the  uredo 
stage  of  a  rust  on  Carex  comosa  at  Lewes.  Nearby  was  a  vine  of  Smilax 
rotundifolia  bearing  aecia  of  Aecidium  macrosjwrum  Pk.  Aecidium 
Nesaeae  Ger.  on  Decodon  verticillata  was  also  collected  at  Lewes  in  the 
immediate  vicinity  of  the  rust  on  Carex  comosa. 

The  material  collected  was  sent  to  Dr.  Arthur,  who  stated  that  the 
form  on  Carex  com/)8a  probably  represented  an  undescribed  species.  A 
trip  to  the  same  vicinity  was  made  at  Dr.  Arthur's  request  in  November 
1907  for  the  purpose  of  collecting  this  and  other  forms  for  culture  work. 
Telia  were  collected  on  Carex  comosa  at  that  time,  showing  the  form  to 
be  a  Puccinia.  The  following  spring  Dr.  Arthur  (Mycol.  1:243.  1909) 
sowed  this  on  various  hosts,  including  Smilax  hispida  and  the  typical 
aecia  of  Aecidium  macrosporum  Pk.  were  produced. 

69.  Puccinia  malvacearum  Bert.  Gay's  Hist,  de  Chile  8:43.     1852. 

On  Malvaceae: 

Althaea  rosea  Cav.,  Newark,  Oct.  16,  1909,  J.  Taubenhaus. 
Malva  rotundifolia  L.,  Newark,  May  24,  1913,  Julia  Clark,  May 
25,  1916,  C.  0.  Houghton. 

70.  Puccinia  marylandica  Lindr.  Medd.  f.  Stockh.  Hogsk.  Bot.  Inst. 

4:  (2).     190L 
On  Ammiaceae: 

Sanicula  canadensis  L.,  Collins  Beach,  Oct.  1,  1907,  (1815). 

71.  Puccinia  Menthae  Pers.  Syn.  Fung.  227.     1801. 

On  Labiatae: 

Koellia  muiica  (Michx.)   Britt.,  Clayton,  July  24,  1907,  (1709). 
Monarda  punctata  L.,  Seaford,  July  9,  1907. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


348 

72.  PucciNiA  MiNUTissiMA  Arth.  Bull.  Torrey  Club  34:587.     1907. 
Aecidium  Nesaeae  Ger.   Bull.   Torrey  Club  4:47.     1873.      (Not  P. 

Nesaeae  E.  &  E.     1895.) 
On  Lythraceae:    I. 

Decodon  verticillata  (L.)  Ellis,  Seaford,  July  9,  1907,  (2256); 
Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907,  (1690). 
The  Aecidium  on  Decodon  was  shown  by  Arthur  in  1914  (Mycol. 
7:86.  1915)  to  be  the  aecial  stage  of -P.  minutissima.  Typical  aecia 
were  developed  on  Decodon,  following  inoculation  with  telial  material 
on  Carex  filifomiis  from  Ontario.  The  telial  stage  has  not  been  found 
in  Delaware  and  has  apparently  been  collected  but  rarely.  Species 
referred  here  in  the  Arthur  herbarium  occur  on  C,  teretiuscula,  C.  fili- 
formis  and  C.  aquatilis, 

73.  PUCCINIA  Nesaeae  Ell.  &  Ev.  Bull.  Torrey  Club  22:363.    1895. 

(Not  Aecidium  Nesaeae  Grer.     1873.) 
Aecidium  Ludwigiae  E.  &  E.  Proc.  Phil.  Acad.  1893:155.     1893. 
Puccinia  Ludwigiae  Holw.  N.  A.  Ured.  l':72.     1907.     (Not  P.  Lud- 
wigiae Tepper  1890.) 

Allodus  Ludwigiae  Orton,  Mem.  N.  Y.  Bot.  Card.  6:189.    1916. 
On  Onagraceae:    I. 

Ludungia  sphaerocarpa  Ell.,  Ellendale,  Sept.  1,  1892,  A.  Com- 
mons, (1983). 
This  collection  is  the  type  of  Aecidium  Ludwigiae  E.  &  E.  The 
name  here  used  for  this  species  was  applied  by  Ellis  and  Everhart  to  a 
rust  thought  to  be  on  Necium  (Decodon).  The  host  has  been  shown  by 
Holway  (1.  c.)  to  be  Ludungia  polycarpa.  The  name  has  frequently 
been  misapplied  to  Aecidium  Nesaeae  Ger.  on  Necium  which  has  been 
shown  by  Arthur  (Mycol.  7:86.  1915)  to  be  the  aecial  stage  of  P. 
minutissimu  (c.  f.  67). 

The  rust  is  evidently  an  opsis  form.  Telia  have  been  rarely  collected, 
occurring  in  the  Arthur  herbarium  only  on  L.  polycarpa  from  Iowa  and 
on  L.  virgata  from  Florida. 

74.  Puccinia  nolitangeris  Corda,  Icones  4:16.     1840. 
Puccinia  argentata  Wint.  Rabh.  Krypt.  Fl.  l':194.     1881. 

On  Balsaminaceae:    III. 

Impatiens  biflora  Wald.,  Newark,  Sept.  7,  1905;  Sept.  15,  1906; 
Sept.  1907;    (1552,  1535,  2005). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


349 

Bubak  (Cent.  Bakt.  10=: 574.  1903)  has  show©  by  cultures  that  the 
European  P,  argentata  has  its  aecial  stage  on  Adoxa  moschatellina, 
Arthur  in  1910  (Mycol.  4:20.  1912)  successfully  infected  Impatiens 
aurea  by  sowing  with  aeciospores  from  Adoxa  moschatellina  collected 
in  Iowa,  thus  proving  the  American  and  European  rusts  are  the  same. 

75.  PucciNiA  OBTECTA  Pk.  Bull.  Buffalo  Soc.  Nat.  Hist.  1:66.    1873. 
Aecidium   compositarum   Bideniis    Burrill;    DeToni,   in    Sacc.    Syll. 

Fung.  7:799.     1888. 

On  Cyperaceae: 

Scirpus  ftuviatilis  (Torr.)  A.  Gray?  Wilmington,  Nov.  5,  1886, 

A.  Commons  (1076). 
Scirpus  americamis  Pers.,  Wilmington,  Oct.  11,  1889,  A.  Com- 
mons (1026). 
Arthur  in  1907  (Jour.  Myc.  14:20.     1908)  has  shown  that  P,  obtecta 
Pk.  has  its  aecial  stage  on  Bidens.     Successful  sowings  of  teliospores 
from  A.  americanus  collected  in  Indiana  were  made  on  B.  frondosa  and 
B.  comata. 

76.  PUCCINIA  ORBICULA  Pk.  &  Curt.  Ann.  Rep.  N.  Y.  State  Mus.  30:53. 

1879. 
On  Cichoriaceae: 

Nabalus  sp.,  Newark,  1907,  M.  T.  Cook. 

77.  Puccinia  Pammelii  (Trel.)   Arth.  Jour.  Myc.  11:56.     1905. 
Puccinia  Panici  Diet.  Erythea  3:80.     1895. 

Aecidiiim  Pammelii  Trel.  Trans.  Wis.  Acad.  Sci.  6:136.     1885. 
On  Poaceae: 

Panicum  virgatum  L.,  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,   (1789). 

Stuart  (Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.  1901:284.  1902)  shows  by  cultures 
that  Aecidium  Pammelii  on  Euphorbia  corollata  is  the  aecial  stage  of 
P.  panici.  These  results  were  confirmed  by  Arthur  in  1904  and  1905 
(Jour.  Myc.  11:56.  1905;  12:16.  1906)  by  sowing  telial  material  on 
P.  virgatum.  from  Indiana,  on  E,  corollata  with  resulting  infection  and 
development  of  aecia.  In  1907  (Jour.  Myc.  14:16.  1908)  successful 
infection  on  E.  ma^ulata  was  obtained  following  sowings  of  teliospores 
from  the  same  host  collected  in  Nebraska.  At  the  same  time  negative 
results  were  obtained  on  E.  corollata.  These  results  indicate  the  presence 
of  physiological  races  in  this  species. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


350 

78.  PucciNiA    PiMPBNELLAE    (Strauss)    Mart.    Fl.    Mosq.    Ed.    11:226. 

1817. 
Uredo  Pimpinellae  Strauss,  Wettst.  Ann.  2:102.     1810. 
Aecidium  Osmorrhizae  Pk.  Ann.  Rep.  N.  Y.  State  Mus.  24:92.    1872. 
Puccinia  Osmorrhizae  C.  &  P. ;  Peck  in  Ann.  Rep.  N.  Y.  State  Mus. 
29:73.     1878. 

On  Ammiaceae: 

Washingtonia:  brevistylis  DC,  Newark,  May  2,  1907,  I   (1575), 
May  29,  1907,  III,   (1659). 

79.  Puccinia  poculiformis  (Jacq.)  Wettst.  Verhl.  Zool.-Bot.  Ges.  Wien 

35:544.     1885. 

Lycoperdon  poculiforme  Jacq.  Coll.  Austr.  1:122.     1786. 

Aecidium  Berberidis  Pers.  in  J.  F.  Gmel  Syst.  Nat.  2:1473.     1791. 

Puccinia  graminis  Pers.  Neues  Mag.  Bot.  1:119.     1794. 

Puccinia  Phlei-pratensis  Erikss,  &  Henn.  Zeit.  f.  Pflanzenkr.  4:140. 
1894. 

On  Poaceae: 

Agrostis  alba  L.,  Newark,  Aug.  23,  1907,   (1715,  1713). 
Phleum  pratense  L.,  Newark,  Aug.  23,  1907,   (1720). 
Triticum  vulgar e  L.,  Newark,  Aug.  23,  1907,   (1721). 

DeBary  (Monatsber.  K.  Akad.  d.  Wiss.  Berlin  25.  1865)  was  the 
first  to  show  that  the  well  known  Puccinia  graminis  developed  its  aecial 
form  on  Berberis.  In  1864  he  first  sowed  telia  from  Agropyron  repens 
and  Poa  pratensis  on  leaves  of  Berberis  resulting  in  the  development  of 
pycnia  and  aecia.  He  later  (1865)  infected  Secale  cereale  by  sowing 
aeciospores  from  Berberis.  This  is  the  first  record  of  the  connection 
of  two  stages  of  an  heteroecious  rust  by  inoculation.  Since  DeBary's 
first  publication  of  the  life  history  of  this  species  a  large  number  of 
mycologists  in  all  parts  of  the  world  have  conducted  culture  work  con- 
firming DeBary's  results  and  adding  to  our  knowledge  of  the  species. 
For  a  review  of  this  work  see  Klebahn  (Die  Wirtswechs  Rostpilze  Berlin 
205-235.     1904). 

In  America  the  most  important  work  has  been  conducted  by  Carle- 
ton  (Div.  Veg.  Phys.  &  Path.  U.  S.  D.  A.  Bull.  16.  1899;  Bur.  PI.  Ind. 
U.  S.  D.  A.  Bull.  63.     1904);  Arthur   (Jour.  Myc.  8:53.     1902;   11:57. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


351 

1905;  12:17.  1906;  13:198.  1907;  14:16.  1908;  Mycol.  2:227.  1910; 
4:18.  1912);  Freeman  &  Johnson  (Bur.  PI.  Ind.  U.  S.  D.  A.  Bull.  216. 
1911);  Stakman  (Minn.  Exp.  Sta.  Bull.  138.  1914;  Jour.  Agr.  Research 
4:193-199.  1915)  ;  Stakman  and  Piemeisel  (Jour.  Agr.  Research  6:813- 
816.     1916;  10:429-495.     1917). 

80.  PucciNiA  PODOPHYLLI  Schw.  Schrift.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:72.     1822. 

On  Berberidaceae  : 

Podophyllum  peltatum  L.,  Newark,  May  1890,  F.  D.  Chester, 
May  15,  1906,  I,  (1621),  June  19,  1907,  III,  (1660) ;  Hockessin, 
May  5,  1913;  CO.  Houghton. 

81.  PucciNiA  POLYGONI-AMPHIBII  Pers.  Syn.  Meth.  Fungi  227.     1801. 
Aecidium   Geranii-maculati    Schw.    Schr.    Nat.    Ges.    Leipzig    1:67. 

1822. 

Aecidium  Sanguinolentum  Lindr.  Eot.  Nat.  1900:241.     1900. 
On  Geraniaceae:      L 

Geranium  maculatum  L.,  Wilmington,  June  29,  1893,  A.  Com- 
mojis  (2099). 
On  Polygon aceae  :    II,  III. 

Persicaria  muhlenhergii  (S.  Wats.)  Small  (Polygonum  ernersum 
(Michx.)   Britton),  Wilmington,  Aug.  17,  1886,  A.  Commons 
(297). 
Persicaria   pennsylvanicum    (L.)    Small    (Polygonum   pennsyl- 
vanicum  L.),  Newark,  Sept.  17,  1890,  F.  D.  Chester. 
Dr.  Tranzschel  first  showed    (Centr.  f.  Bakt.   11=^:106.     1903)    that 
this  species  on  Polygonum  was  connected  with  Aecidium  Sanguinolentum 
on  Geranium  sp.     These  results  were  confirmed  in  America  by  Arthur 
(Jour.  Myc.  11:59.     1905)   who  used  aeciospores  from  Geranium  macu- 
latum to  inoculate  Polygonum  ernersum,     Uredinia  and  telia  developed 
from  this  culture.    In  1905  (Jour.  Myc.  12:18.    1906)  these  results  were 
confirmed  by  successfully  sowing  teliospores  from  Polygonum  ernersum 
on  Geranium  maculatu^n  resulting  in  the  typical  aecia  of  A.  Sanguino- 
lentum.    These  results  prove  that  the  European   and   American   rusts 
referred  to  this  species  are  identical. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


352 

82.  PucciNiA  PoLYGONi-CoNVOLVULi  Hedw.  f.,  Poiret.  Encycl.  Meth.  Bot. 

8:251.     1808. 
Puccinia  Polygoni  A.  &  S.  Consp.  Fung.  132.     1805.     (Not  P.  Poly- 
goni  Pers.     1794.) 

On  Polygon aceae: 

Polygonum  Convolvulus  L.,  Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907,  II,  (1692). 

83.  Puccinia  pustulatum  (Curtis)  Arth.  Jour.  Myc.  10:18.    1904. 
Aecidium  pustulatum  Curtis;   Peck,  Ann.  Rep.   N.  Y.   State  Mus. 

23:60.     1873. 

On  Poaceae: 

Schizachyrium  scoparium   (Michx.)    Nash    (Andropogon  scopa- 
rius  Michx.),  Seaford,  Nov.  15,  1907,   (1760). 

This  species  of  Andropogon  rust  is  difficult  to  separate  from  P. 
Andropogonis  Schw.  In  the  latter,  however,  the  uredospore  markings 
are  finely  verrucose-echinulate  with  the  pores  3-4  scattered  (rarely 
appearing  equatorial)  while  in  the  form  here  considered  the  uredospore 
markings  are  of  the  echinulate  type  and  the  pores  4-6  scattered. 

The  life  history  of  this  heteroecious  rust  was  first  determined  by 
Arthur  in  1903  (Jour.  Myc.  10:17.  1904).  He  sowed  germinating  telio- 
spores  from  Andropogon  furcatu^  and  A.  scoparium  collected  in  Indiana 
on  Comandra  utnhellata  and  obtained  the  development  of  pycnia  and 
aecia  of  Aecidium  pustulatum.  These  experiments  were  successfully 
verified  in  1905  and  1910  (Jour.  Myc.  12:16.  1906;  Mycol.  4:17.  1912) 
using  telial  material  on  A.  furcatus  from  Indiana  and  Colorado. 

84.  Puccinia  recedens  Syd.  Monog.  Ured.  1:146.    1902. 

On  Cardu aceae: 

Senecio  aureus  L.,  Naaman's  Creek,  July  28,  1893,  A.  Commons 
(2129). 
This  species  has  previously  been  confused  with  P,  Asteris  Duby. 
It  is  a  micro-Puccinia  common  on  Sinecio  aureus  in  the  northeastern 
United  States.     It  is  known  on  other  hosts  from  the  Atlantic  to  the 
Pacific  in  the  more  northern  states. 

85.  Puccinia   Rhamni    (Pers.)    Wettst.   Verhl.   Zool-Bot.   Ges.   Wein. 

35:545.     1885. 
Aecidium  Rhamni  Pers.  in  Gmel.  Syst.  Nat.  2:1472.     1791. 
Puccinia  coronata  Corda,  Icones  1:6.     1837. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


353 

On  Poaceae: 

Avena  saliva  L.,  Newark,  July  17,  1903,  C.  O.  Smith;  Clayton, 
July  24,  1907,   (1708). 

This  species  is  the  common  coronate  spored  rust  and  occurs  through- 
out the  United  States  on  cultivated  oats  and  on  a  great  variety  of  native 
grasses.  DeBary  '(Monat.  Akad.  Wiss.  211.  1866.)  was  the  first  to 
conduct  culture  experiments  indicating  the  genetic  connection  with  aecia 
on  Frangula  and  Rhamnus  in  Europe.  Since  that  time  many  European 
authors  have  conducted  culture  experiments,  a  summary  of  which  has 
been  made  by  Klebahn  (Wirtw.  Rostp.  254-262.     1904). 

In  America  this  species  has  been  studied  by  Carleton  (Div.  Veg. 
Phys.  &  Path.  16:48.  1899),  who  obtained  uredinia  on  cultivated  oats, 
Arrhenatherum  elatius  and  Phalaris  caroliniana  by  sowing  aeciospores 
from  Rhamnus  lanceolata.  Carleton  also  carried  out  extensive  cross 
inoculations  between  oats  and  many  native  grasses.  (See  also  Bur.  PI. 
Ind.  Bull.  63:15.     1904.) 

At  about  the  same  time  Arthur  (Bull.  Lab.  Nat.  Hist.  State  Univ. 
Iowa  4:398.  1898)  obtained  infection  on  oats  with  aeciospores  from 
R.  lanceolata.  In  1904  the  same  author  (Jour.  Myc.  11:58.  .1905)  suc- 
cessfully confirmed  the  results  of  European  and  other  investigators  by 
sowing  aeciospores  from  Rhamnus  cathariica^  R,  caroliniana,  R.  lanceo- 
lata on  Avena  saliva  resulting  in  the  production  of  urediniospores  in  all 
cases.  In  1910  the  same  author  (Mycol.  4:18.  1912)  successfully  in- 
fected Rhamnus  calhartica  by  sowing  teliospores  from  Calamagroslis 
canadensis  from  Nova  Scotia. 

86.     PucciNiA  RUBELLA   (Pers.)   Arth.  Bot.  Gaz.  34:15.     1902. 
Aecidium  rubellum  Pers.  in  Gmel.  Syst.  Nat.  2:1473.     1791. 
Uredo  Phragmiles  Schum.  Enum.  PI.  Saell.  2:231.     1803. 
Puccinia  Phragmiles  Koem.  Hedwigia  15:179.     1876. 
On  Poaceae: 

Phragmiles  Phragmiles  (L.)  Karst.,  Wilmington,  Nov.  1,  1893, 

A.  Commons  (2364). 

Winter  (Hedwigia  14:115.    1875)  was  the  first  to  show  the  relation 

between  Puccinia  Phragmiles  and  Aecidium  rubellum.     He  successfully 

infected  Rumex  hydrolapathum  with  sporidia  from  Phragmites.    He  also 

infected  the  latter  host,  using  aeciospores.     These   results  have  been 

23—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


354 

confirmed  by  several  European  investigators.  The  summary  of  their 
results  will  be  found  in  Klebahn  (Die  Wirtsw.  Rostp.  283.     1904). 

Arthur  in  1899  (Bot.  Gaz.  29:269.  1900)  produced  aecia  on  Rumex 
crispus  and  R,  obtusifoliiis  with  sowings  of  teliospores  from  P.  Phrag- 
mites.  These  results  have  been  repeatedly  confirmed  by  the  same  author 
and  reported  in  Jour.  Myc.  9:220.  1903;  14:15.  1908;  and  Mycol.  2:225. 
1910;  4:54.    1912. 

Bates  (Jour.  Myc.  9:219.  1903)  made  some  interesting  field  cul- 
tures and  observations  on  the  natural  occurrence  of  the  aecial  stage  on 
Rheum  and  Rumex  (3  species)  lending  confirmatory  evidence  to  the 
results  of  previous  investigators. 

87.     PUCCINIA  Sambuci   (Schw.)   Arth.  Bot.  Gaz.  35:15.     1903. 
Aecidium  Sambuci  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:67.     1822. 
Puccinia  Bolleyana  Sacc.  Am.  Microsc.  Jour.  169.     1889. 
Puccinia  Atkinsoniana  Diet,  in  Atk.  Bull.  Cornell  Univ.  3:19.     1897. 
Puccinia  Thompsonii  Hume,  Bot.  Gaz.  29:353.     1900. 
On  Caprifoliaceae:    I. 

Sambucus  canadensis  L.,  Seaford,  July  9,  1907,   (1650),  April 

23,  1908,  (2022). 
Sambucus  pubens  Michx.,  Newark,  June  9,  1907,  (1665). 
On  Cyperaceae:    II,  III. 

Carex  bullata  Schk.,  Seaford,  June  4,  1908,   (2083). 
Carex    lurida   Wahl.,    Newark,    Aug.    and    Sept.,    1907,    (171if, 
1819);  Felton,  Sept.  5,  1907,   (1738);  Collins  Beach,  Oct.  1, 

1907,  (1788) ;  Seaford,  Nov.  14,  1907,  (1767,  1858) ;  June  5, 

1908,  (2082). 

Arthur  in  1901  conducted  culture  experiments  (Jour.  Myc.  8:55. 
1902)  proving  that  Aecidium  Sambuci  on  Sambucus  canadensis  was  spe- 
cifically connected  with  Puccinia  Bolleyana  on  Carex  trichocarpa.  In 
1902  further  experiments  were  conducted  (Bot.  Gaz.  35:14.  1903)  con- 
firming the  above  results  and  showing  that  Puccinia  Atkinsoniana  on 
Carex  lurida  is  also  a  synonym  and  has  its  aecial  stage  on  Sambucus. 
See  also  the  results  of  culture  work  in  1904  (Jour.  Myc.  11:58.  1905) 
and  1905  (Jour.  Myc.  12:14.  1906)  and  1906  (Jour.  Myc.  13:195.  1907) 
in  which  Carex  lupulina  and  C  Frankii  are  definitely  proven  to  bear  telia 
of  P.  Sambuci.  The  results  of  1902  were  confirmed  in  1908  (Mycol.  1:233. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


355 

1909).  Kellerman  (Jour.  Myc.  9:7.  1903)  confirmed  Arthur's  results 
as  to  the  connection  of  Aecidium  Sambuci  with  P.  Atkinsoniana  on  Car  ex 
lurida  and  with  P.  Bolleyana  on  C.  trichocarpa. 

88.  PucciNiA  Smilacis  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:72.     1822. 
Aecidium  Smilacis  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:69.     1822. 

On  Smilaceae: 

Smilax  glauca  Walt.,  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,   (1752). 

Smilax  rotundifolia  L.,  Newark,  October  1907,  (2007)  ;  Collins 

Beach,  Oct.  1,  1907,  (1816);  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,  (1754). 

This  is  an  autoecious  long  cycle  rust  common  throughout  the  eastern 

United  States.    No  aecial  collections  have  been  made  in  Delaware.    The 

aecia  may  be  distinguished  from  the  aecia  of  Puccinia  m^a^rospora  (Pk.) 

Arth.,  which  occur  on  Smilax  in  the  same  range,  by  the  size  of  the 

aeciospores.    In  P.  Smilacis  the  aecioopores  are  17-22x20-30ijl  with  the  wallj 

1-1. 5ii  while  the  aecispores  of  P.  macrospora  measure  32-42x37-51ii.  with  thick 

walls  1.5-2.5^1,  thickened  above  to  5-10ijl. 

89.  Puccinia  Sorghi  Schw.  Trans.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  II.  4:295.     1832. 
Puccinia  Maydis  Bereng.  Atti  Sci.  Hal.  6:475.     1844. 
Aecidium  Oxalidis  Thiim.   Flora  59:425.     1876. 

On  Poaceae: 

Zea  Mays  L.,  Faulkland,  Sept.  8,  1885,  A.  Commons    (210); 
Newark,  Sept.  17,  1890,  F.  D.  Chester;  Sept.  1907;  Felton, 
Sept.  5,  1907,   (1735). 
The  com  rust  is  very  common  in  Delaware  and  has  been  repeatedly 
observed  but  apparently  does  little  damage. 

Arthur  in  1904  (Bot.  Gaz.  38:64.  1904;  Jour.  Myc.  11:65.  1905) 
shows  that  the  com  rust  has  its  aecial  stage  on  Oxalis.  These  results 
were  confirmed  in  1905  by  the  same  author  (Jour.  Myc.  12:17.  1906) 
who  successfully  infected  corn  with  aeciospores  from  Oxalis  cymosa, 

90.  Puccinia  subnitens  Diet.  Erythea  3:81.     1895. 

On  Chenopodiaceae  :    I. 

Atriplex  hastata  L.,  Lewes,  April  1908,   (2041),  June  6,  1908, 
(2038). 
On  Cruciferous  seedling:    I. 

Lewes,  April  23,  1908,  (2025). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


356 

On  Polygon aceae:    I. 

Polygonum  aviculare  L.,  Lewes,  April  25,  1908,   (2020). 
.  On  Poaceae:    II,  III. 

Distichlis  spicata   (L.)    Greene,  Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907,   (1677), 

Nov.  16,  1907,  (1854,  1855),  April  25,  1908,  (2021),  June  6. 

1908,   (2039). 

Arthur  (Bot.  Ga^.  35:19.     1903  first  showed  that  the  above  species 

has  its  aecial  form  on  Chenopodiaceae  having  produced  aecia  on  Cheno- 

podium  album  by  sowings  of  teliospores  from  Distichlis  spicata.    In  1904 

(Jour.   Myc.   11:54.     1905)    he  records  successful  infection  results  on 

Chenopodium  album,  Cleome  spinoia,  Lepidium,  apetalum.,  L,  virginicum, 

Sophia  incisa,  Erysimum  a^perumy  from  sowings  of  teliospores   from 

Distichlis  spicata.     This  is  remarkable  since  the  above  hosts  represent 

three  distinct  families  of  flowering  plants. 

In  1905  (Jour.  Myc.  12:16.  1906)  Bursa  Bursa  pastoris  is  added 
to  the  above  list,  since  aecia  were  produced  following  sowings  of  telio- 
spores from  Distichlis  spicata.  Further  results  are  recorded  by  the 
same  author  in  1906  (Jour.  Myc.  13:197.  1907)  and  in  1907  (Jour.  Myc. 
14:15.     1908). 

In  1908  Arthur  records  successful  infection  on  Chenopodium  album 
resulting  from  sowings  of  teliospores  from  Distichlis  spicata  collected 
at  Lewes,  Del.,  and  sent  to  Dr.  Arthur  by  the  writer  (Mycol.  1:234. 
1909).  Cultures  from  Nebraska  made  in  the  same  year  were  successful 
on  C.  album.  Material  from  Nevada  successfully  infected  C  album, 
Atriplex  hastata,  and  Sarcobatu^  vermiculatus. 

Further  culture  work  with  this  species  is  recorded  by  Arthur  in 
Mycol.  2:225.  1910;  4:18.  1912.  (See  also  Bethel,  Phytopath.  7:92-94. 
1917.) 

91.     PucciNiA  Taraxaci    (Rebent.)    Plowr.   Brit.   Ured.   and   Ust.    186. 
1889. 
Puccinia  Phaseoli  var.  Taraxaci  Rebent.  Fl.  Neomarch  256.     1804. 
On  Cichoriaceae  : 

Taraxacum    Taraxaciim     (L.)     Karst.,  —  Newark,    July    1907, 
(1671). 
This  is  doubtless  a  brachy-form  though  no  pycnia  have  yet  been 
demonstrated   to   accompany   the   primary  uredinia.     Cultures   will   be 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


357 

necessary  to  determine  its  life  history  with  certainty.     It  seems  prob- 
able that  the  uredinia  are  able  to  carry  the  fungus  over  the  winter. 

92.  PucciNiA  TRiTiciNA  Erikss.  Ann.  Sci.  Nat.  VIII,  9:270.     1899. 

On  Poaceae: 

Tritictiin  vulgare  L.,  Newark,  July  2,  1907,  (1882),  June  21, 
1907,  (1662). 
This  is  the  common  leaf  rust  of  wheat  found  in  all  parts  of  the 
United  States  as  well  as  in  most  sections  of  the  world  where  wheat  is 
cultivated.  The  life  history  is  unknown.  It  is  a  sub-epidermal  form  and 
is  morphologrically  very  similar  to  leaf  rusts  on  wild  grasses  commonly 
referred  to  P.  tomipara  and  P.  Agropyri  (P.  clematidis  (DC.)  Lagerh.), 
having  aecia  on  Thalictrum,  Clematis  and  other  Ranunculaceous  hosts. 

93.  PucciNiA  URTICATA  (Lk.)  Kem,  Mycologia  9:214.    1917. 
Aecidium  Urticae  Schum.  Enum.  PI.  Saell.  2:222.     1803. 
Caeoma  urticatum  Link,  in  Willd.  Sp.  PI.  6':62.     1825. 
Puccinia   Urticae  Lagerh.   Mitt.   Bad.  Ver.   2:72.     1889.      (Not  P. 

Urticae  Barcl.  1887.) 

On  Cyperaceae:    II,  III. 

Carex  stricta  Lam.,  Seaford,  April  23,  1908,  (2029). 

Magnus  in  1872  (Vehr.  Hot.  Ver.  Prov.  Brandbg.  14:1872.)  first 
showed  that  Aecidium  Urticae  on  Urtica  dioica  was  the  aecial  stage  of 
P.  Caricis  (Schum.)  Rebent.  on  Carex  hirta.  Many  other  European 
investigators  have  repeated  this  work  with  additional  hosts,  including 
Schroeter,  Comu,  Plowright,  Ed.  Fischer  and  Klebahn.  A  general  review 
is  given  by  Klebahn  (Wirtsw.  Rostp.  293.     1904). 

In  America  Arthur  (Bot.  Gaz.  29:270.  1900)  was  the  first  to  con- 
duct successful  cultures.  He  obtained  the  development  of  uredinia  on 
Carex  stricta  by  inoculating  with  spores  of  Aecidium  Urticae, 

Later  cultures  (Jour.  Myc.  8:52.  1902;  Bot.  Gaz.  35:16.  1903) 
showed  that  aeciospores  developed  on  Urtica  gracilis  following  sowings 
of  teliospores  from  Carex  stricta  collected  in  Nebraska  and  C.  riparia 
from  Iowa.  In  1905  (Jour.  Myc.  12:15.  1906)  teliospores  on  C.  stipata 
from  Indiana  and  from  C  aquatilis  collected  in  Colorado,  were  used  in 
successful  cultures  on  U,  gracilis.  In  1907  (Jour.  Myc.  14:14.  1908) 
Arthur  again  conducted  successful  sowings  of  teliospores  from  Indiana 
material  on  C  stipata  and  from  Nebraska  material  on  C.  riparia.     In 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


358 

1909  the  same  author  (Mycol.  2:223.  1910)  used  teliospores  from  C. 
aristata  from  North  Dakota  to  successfully  infect  U.  gracilis  with  pro- 
duction of  aecia.  In  1910  (Mycol.  4:17.  1912)  the  results  of  1909  were 
repeated  and  successful  sowings  on  U,  gracilis  were  again  made  by  using 
Indiana  material  to  infect  U,  gracilis. 

Kelierman  In  1902  (Jour.  Myc.  9:9.  1903)  was  also  successful  in 
obtaining  infection  on  U.  gracilis  by  using  telial  material  on  C.  riparia 
and  C.  stricta  from  Ohio. 

94.  PucciNiA  ViOLAE  (Schum.)   DC.  Fl.  Fr.  6:62.     1815. 
Aeddium  Violae  Schum.  Enum.  PI.  Saell.  2:224,     1803. 

On  Violaceae: 

Viola  afflnis  LeConte,  Newark,  May  15,  1906,  I,   (1622). 
Viola  Labradorica  Schw.   (?),  Faulkland,  Aug.  1,  1884,  II,  III, 

A.  Commons,  (193). 
Viola  lanceolata  L.,  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907.   (1938). 

95.  PUCCINIA  WiNDSORiAE  Schw.  Trans.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  II  4:295.     1832. 
Aeddium  Pteleae  Berk.  &  Curtis;  Berkeley,  Grevillea  3:60.     1874. 

On  Poaceae:    II,  III. 

Tricuspis  seslerioides  (Michx.)  Torr.,  Lewes,  Nov.  16,  1907, 
(1852);  Newark,  Oct.  16,  1907,  (1834). 
This  species  has  been  shown  to  be  connected  with  Aeddium  Pteleae 
on  Ptelea  trifoliata  by  Arthur  in  1899  (Bot.  Gaz.  29:273.  1900).  He 
succeeded  in  obtaining  the  development  of  typical  uredinia  of  this  spe- 
cies on  Tricu^pis  seslerioides  by  inoculating  with  aeciospores  of  Aecidium 
Pteleae  from  Indiana.  These  results  were  confirmed  in  1902  (Bot.  Gaz. 
35:16.     1903)   and  again  in  1904   (Jour.  Myc.  11:56.     1905). 

96.  Puccini  A  Xanthii  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:73.     1822. 

On  Ambrosiaceae: 

Ambrosia  trifida  Mill.,  Newark,  Sept.  15,  1905,  (1556) ;  July  26, 

1906,  (1616);  Aug.  23,  1907,  (1723). 

Xanthium  sp.,  Newark,  Sept.  15,  1905,  (1540) ;  Lewes,  Aug.  14, 

1907,  (1691). 

This  common  species  is  a  lepto-form  possessing  telia  only  in  the 
life  history. 

Carleton  (Bur.  PI.  Ind.  U.  S.  D.  A.  Bull.  63:26.  1904)  in  1897  and 
1898  conducted  culture  experiments  showing  that  this  species  is  auto- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


359 

ecious.  He  repeatedly  infected  Xanthirm  seedlings  by  inoculating  with 
teliospores  from  same  host  but  was  unable  to  infect  Ambrosia  trifida. 
He  believes  this  species  to  be  distinct  from  the  form  on  Ambrosia  trifida. 

In  1905  and  1906  Arthur  (Jour.  Myc.  12:20.  1906;  13:198.  1907) 
confirmed  Carleton's  work.  He  also  failed  to  infect  Ambrosia  trifida 
with  spores  from  Xanthium.  No  pycnia  have  been  found  in  herbarium 
specimens  nor  did  they  develop  in  the  cultures  recorded  above. 

It  is  evident  from  these  culture  experiment?  that  we  have  here  a 
rust,  while  morphologically  indistinguishable  on  the  two  host  genera, 
yet  exists  in  two  independent  races. 

97.  Ravenelia  epiphylla  (Schw.)  Dietel,  Hedwigia  33:27.     1894. 
Sphaeria  epiphylla  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:40.     1822. 

On  Fabaceae: 

Cracca  virginiana  L.,  Townsend,  June  11,  1890,  A.  Conmfions 
(1438). 

98.  Tranzschelia  punctata    (Pers.)    Arth.   Result   Sci.    Congr.   Bot. 

Vienna  340.     1906. 
Aecidium  punctatum  Pers.  Ann.  Bot.  Usteri  20:135.     1796. 
Puccinia  Pruni-spinosae  Pers.  Syn.  Fung.  226.     1801. 
On  Ranunculaceae:    I. 

Anemone  quinquefolia  L.,  Newark,  May  8,  1897,  F.  D.  Chester, 

May  10,  1907,   (1656). 
Hepatica  Hepatica    (L.)    Karst,   Faulkland,   May   3,   1884,   A. 
Commons,  Newark,  May  22,  1907,  (1566),  May  1908,  (2254). 
On  Amygdalaceae:    II,  III. 

PrumLs  serotina  Ehrh.,  Greenbank,  Aug.  24,  1886,  A.  Commons 
(26). 
Dr.  Tranzschel  in  1904  (Trans.  Mus.  Bot.  Acad.  St.  Petersb.  11 :67- 
69.  1905)  first  showed  that  Aecidium  punctatum  on  Anemone  was  the 
aecial  stage  of  P.  Pruni-spinosae.  He  succeeded  in  obtaining  the  char- 
acteristic uredinia  of  this  species  on  Amygdalus  communis ,  Prunus 
spinosa  and  P.  divaricata  following  sowings  with  aeciospores  from  Ane- 
mone coronaria,  Aecia  on  Anemone  ranunculoides  were  also  used  to 
infect  Prunus  spinosa  with  similar  results. 

In  America  Arthur  in  1905  (Jour.  Myc.  12:19.     1906)   showed  that 
this  species  has  its  aecia  on  Hepatica  acutiloba   (Aecidium  Hepaticum 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


360 

Schw.)  having  successfully  infected  Prunvis  serotina  with  aeciospores 
from  that  host.  These  results  were  confirmed  in  1906  (Jour.  Myc. 
13:199.  1907);  a  successful  infection  resulting  in  uredinia  having  been 
obtained  on  P.  serotina  and  P.  pumila  following  inoculation  with  aecia 
on  Hepatica.  Failure  to  obtain  infection  on  P.  americana,  P,  cerasus 
and  Amygdalus  Persica,  however,  indicates  that  in  America  at  least 
there  are  distinct  races. 

It  is  probable  that  the  uredinial  spores  are  able  to  carry  this  species 
over  the  winter  in  some  localities. 

The  aecial  stage  is  perennial  and  the  affected  leaves  are  character- 
istically modified.  On  Hepatica  the  leaves  stand  upright  and  are  much 
reduced  in  size  and  g^reatly  thickened. 

99.  Uromyces  appendiculatus  (Pers.)  Fries,  Summa  Veg.  Scand.  514. 

1849. 
Uredo  appendiculata  Pers.  Ann.  Bot.  Usteri  15:16.     1795. 
Uromyces  Phaseoli  Wint.  in  Rab.  Krypt.  Fl.  r:157.     1881. 
Nigredo  appendiculata  Arth.  Result.  Sci.  Congr.  Bot,  Vienna  343. 
1906. 

On  Fabaceae: 

Phaseolus  vulgaris  L.,  Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907,   (1684)  ;  Newark, 

September  1905,   (1632);  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,   (1981). 
Strophostyles  helvola  (L.)  Britt.,  Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907,  (1682); 

Felton,  Sept.  5,  1907,   (1736). 
Strophostyles  umbellata    (Muhl.)    Britt.,  Selbyville,  October  4, 
1907,   (1987);  Wilmington,  Oct.  11,  1907,   (1932). 
That  the  above  is  an  autoecious  form  was  shown  by  Arthur  in  190n 
(Jour.  Myc.  10:14.     1904).    He  cultured  the  form  on  Strophostyles  hel- 
vola.    Pycnia  and  aecia  followed  inoculation  with  over-wintered  telio- 
spores  on  the  same  host. 

100.  Uromyces  Caladii   (Schw.)   Farl.  Ellis,  N.  A.  Fungi  232.     1879. 
Aecidium  Caladii  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:69.     1822. 
Vromyces  Peltandrae  Howe,  Bull.  Torrey  Club  5:3.     1874. 
Nigredo  Caladii  Arth.  Result.  Sci.  Congr.  Bot.  Vienna  343.     1906. 

On  Araceae: 

Ay-isaema  dracontium  Schott,  Faulkland,  June  4,  1885,  A.  Com- 
mons. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


361 

Arisaema  tnphyllum  (L.)  Schott,,  Newark,  May  1892,  I,  F.  D. 
Chester,  May  15,  1906,  (1619) ;  Faulkland,  July  18,  1885,  III, 
A.  Commons. 

Peltandra  virginica  (L.)  Kunth,  Symma,  June  9,  1894,  A.  Com- 
mons; Seaford,  July  9,  1907,  (1672,  1864);  Lewes,  Aug.  14, 
1907,  (2261);  Wilmington,  Oct.  11,  1907,  (1931). 

101.  Uromyces  caryophyllinus   (Schrank.)   Wint.  in  Rab.  Krypt.  Fl. 

r:149.     1881. 
Lyeoperdon  caryophyllinum  Schrank.  Baier.  Fl.  2:668.     1789. 
On  Cabyophyllaceae: 

Dianihus  caryophyllus  L.,  Wilmington,  Jan.  1909,  C.  0.  Hough- 
ton. 

102.  Uromyces  Eragrostidis  Tracy,  Jour.  Myc.  7:281.     1893. 
Nigredo  Eragrostidis  Arth.   Result.   Sci.   Congr.   Bot.   Vienna   343. 

1906. 

On  Poaceae: 

Eragrostis  pectinacea  (Michx.)  Steud.,  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907, 
(1792). 

103.  Uromyces  fallens   (Des.)   Kern,  Phytopathology  1:6.     1911. 
Uredo  fallens  Desmaz.  PI.  Crypt.  1325.     1843. 

Nigredo  fallens  Arth.  N.  Am.  Flora  7':254.     1912. 
On  Fabaceae: 

Trifolium  incamatum  L.,  Newark,  spring  1905,  C.  0.  Smith. 
Trifolium  pratense  L.,  Newark,  October  1888,  F.  D.  Chester; 
Nov.  10,  1910,  C.  O.  Houghton;  Seaford,  July  9,  1907,  (1654) ; 
Clayton,  July  24,  1907,  (1710) ;  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907  (1992). 
The  rust  on  red  clover  is  widely  distributed  in  the  state  and  prob- 
ably occurs  wherever  this  host  is  cultivated.    It  is,  however,  rare  on  the 
crimson  clover;  only  one  other  collection  in  America  is  known  to  the 
writer,  and  that  was  collected  in  South  Dakota.    This  species  is  readily 
separated  from  the  only  other  long  cycled  Uromyces  on  Trifolium  oc- 
curring in   North   America  by  the  uredinial  pore  characters.     In  the 
species  under  discussion  the  pores  are  4-6,  scattered,  while  in  V.  Trifolii 
the  pores  are  3-4  in  an  equatorial  zone. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


362 

104.     Uromyces  graminicola  Burrill,  Bot.  Gaz.  9:188.     1884. 

Uromyces  Panici  Tracy,  Jour.  Myc.  7:281.     1893. 

Nigredo  graminicola  Arth.  Result  Sci.  Congr.  Bot.  Vienna  343.   1906. 
On  Poaceae: 

Panicum  virgatum   L.,   Collins   Beach,   Oct.    1,    1907,    (1779)  ; 
Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,  (1790). 

This  species  is  inseparable  morphologrically  from  Puccinia  Panici 
Diet,  except  in  the  number  of  cells  in  the  teliospore.  The  Puccinia  has 
been  studied  culturally  by  Stuart  (Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.  1901:284.  1902) 
and  Arthur  (Jour.  Myc.  11:56.  1905;  12:16.  1906;  14:16.  1908)  and 
shown  to  be  connected  genetically  with  Aecidium  Pammelii  Trel.  on 
Euphorbia  corollata  in  Indiana  and  E,  marginata  in  Nebraska.  Aecia 
on  various  Euphorbiaceous  hosts  have  also  been  referred  to  that  species 
on  morphological  grounds. 

While  no  cultures  of  the  Uromyces  have  been  successfully  carried 
out,  it  is  probable  that  the  aecial  stage  will  be  found  on  some  member 
of  the  Euphorbiaceae.  The  field  evidence  at  present  available  suggests 
that  A.  Stellingiae  Tracy  &  Earle,  which  occurs  on  various  species  of 
Stellingia  and  Sebastina  in  the  south  and  southwest  is  a  very  probable 
aecial  connection.  This  aecidium  is  morphologically  indistinguishable 
from  A.  Pammelii  and  it  is  possible  that  some  of  the  forms  now  referred 
to  that  species  will  be  found  to  belong  here. 

105.  Uromyces  Halstedii  DeToni  in  Sacc.  Syll.  Fung.  7:557.     1888. 
Uromyces  digitatus  Halsted,  Jour.  Myc.  3:138.    1887.     (Not  U.  digi- 

talus  Wint.  1886.) 

Nigredo  Halstedii  Arth.  N.  Am.  Flora  7':226.     1912. 
On  Poaceae: 

Homalocenchrus  oryzoides    (L.)    Poll.    (Leersia  oryzoides    (L.) 
Sw.),  Seaford,  April  23,  1908,  (2034). 
The  aecial  stage  of  this  rather  rare  grass  rust  is  at  present  un- 
known.   The  telial  stage  is  known  to  the  writer  on  the  above  host  other- 
wise only  from  Wisconsin  and  South  Dakota. 

106.  Uromyces  Hedysari-paniculati   (Schw.)   Farl.  Ell.  N.  A.  Fungi 

246.     1879. 
Puccinia  Hedysari-paniculati  Schw.   Schr.   Nat.   Ges.   Leipzig   1:74. 
1822. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


363 

Nigredo  Hedysari-paniculati  Arth.  Result  Sci.  Congr.  Bot.  Vienna 
343.     1906. 

On  Fabaceae: 

Meibomia  Dillenii    (Darl.)    Kuntze,  Faulkland,  Aug.  24,  1886, 

A.  Commons   (319);  Newark,  Sept.  10,  1905,   (1626);  Aug. 

23,  1907,  (1726). 
Meibomia  laevigata   (Nutt.)   Kuntze,  Selbyville,  July  18,  1895, 

A.  Commons  (946). 
Meibomia    Marylandica    (L.)    Kuntze,    Felton,    Sept.    5,    1907, 

(1748);   Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,   (1986). 
Meibomia  obtusa   (Muhl.)   Vail,  Felton,  Sept.  5,  1907,   (1747). 
Meibomia  paniculata  (L.)  Kuntze,  Felton,  Sept.  5,  1907,  (1745)  ; 

Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,  (1985) ;  Lewes,  Aug..  14,  1907,  (1200) ; 

Newark,  Aug.  23,  1907,   (1714). 
Meibomia   stricta    (Pursh)    Kuntze,    Selbyville,    Oct.    4,    1907, 

(1984). 

107.  Uromyces  houstoniatus  (Schw.)  J.  Sheldon,  Torreya  9:55.  1909. 
Aecidium  hoiistoniatum  Schw.  Tran.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  II.  4:309.  1832. 
Nigredo  hoiLstoniata  Sheldon,  Torreya  9:55.    1909. 

On  Rubiaceae: 

Houstonia  coerulea  L.,  Newark,  May  1908,  I,  (2267) ;  Wilming- 
ton, May  31,  1914,  C.  0.  Houghton. 
Sheldon  (1.  c.)  was  the  first  to  prove  by  culture  experiments  that 
Aecidium  houstoniatum  Schw.  on  Houstonia  coerulea  was  genetically 
connected  with  a  telial  form  occurring  on  Sisyrinchium  gramineum. 
Arthur  (Mycologia  1:237.  1908)  confirms  Sheldon's  work  using  living 
plants  of  Hov^tcnia  coerulea  bearing  aecia  collected  by  the  writer  at 
the  above  noted  locality  near  Newark,  and  sent  to  Dr.  Arthur  at  his 
request  for  that  purpose.  A  search  was  made  for  the  telial  stage  in 
the  field  but  without  success.  The  telia  have  been'  collected  only  in 
Maine  and  West  Virginia. 

108.  Uromyces  Howei  Pk.  Ann.  Rep.  N.  Y.  State  Mus.  30:75.     1879. 
On  Asclepiadaceae: 

Asclepias  pulchra  Shrk.,  Newark,  Sept.  14,  1905,  (1631). 

Asclepias  Syriaca  L.,  Wilmington,  August  1894,  A.  Commons 
(issued  as  E.  &  E.  Fungi  Columb.  648) ;  Newark,  Sept.  7, 
1905,   (1551);  Wilmington,  Oct.  11,  1907,   (1930). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


364 

The  life  history  of  this  common  species  is  in  doubt.  It  seems 
probable  that  it  is  autoecious  though  no  aecia  have  ever  been  collected. 
Attempts  to  culture  this  species  have  been  unsuccessful  owing  to  a 
failure  of  the  teliospores  to  germinate.  In  future  study  of  this  species 
it  should  be  borne  in  mind  that  the  species  may  be  heteroecious  or  a 
brachy-form. 

109.  Uromyces   Hyperici-frondosi    (Schw.)    Arth.   Bull.   Minn.   Acad. 

Nat.  Sci.  2*:  15.     1883. 
Aecidium  Hyperici-frondosi   Schw.    Schr.   Nat.    Ges.    Leipzig  1:68. 
1822. 

Nigredo  Hyperici-frondosi  Arth.  Result  Sci.  Congr.  Bot.  Vienna 
344.     1906. 

On  Hypericaceae: 

Hypericum  mutilum  L.,  Felton,  Sept.  5,  1907,    (1751) ;   Selby- 

ville,  Oct.  4,  1907,  (1991). 
Triandeum    virginicum    (L.)     Raf.,    Selbyville,    Oct.    4,    1907, 
(2247). 

110.  Uromyces  Junci-effusi  Sydow,  Monog.  Ured.  2:290.    1910. 
Nigredo  Junci-effusi  Arth.  N.  Am.  Flora  7':239,     1912. 

On  Juncaceae: 
Juncus  effusus  L.,  Newark,  Oct.  14,  1905,  (1537) ;  Clayton,  July 
24,  1907,   (1703);  Collins  Beach,  Oct.  1,  1907,   (1779). 
This  species  is  common  throughout  the  eastern  United  States  on 
this  host  and  is  separated  from  U,  Silphii  on  Juncus  by  the  presence 
of  3-4  equatorial  germ  pores  in  the  uredospores.     In  the  latter  there 
are  but  2  pores  arranged  slightly  above  the  middle. 

111.  Uromyces  Lespedezae-procumbentis   (Schw.)   Curt.  Cat.  PI.  N. 

Car.  123.     1867. 
Puccinia  Lespedezae-procumbentis   Schw.    Schr.   Nat.    Ges.    Leipzig 
1:73.     1822. 

Nigredo  Lespedezae-procumbentis  Arth.  N.  Am.  Flora  7:247.     1912. 
On  Fabaceae: 

Lespedeza  frutescens  (L.)  Britton,  Felton,  Sept.  5,  1907,  III, 
(1749) ;  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,  III,  (1983)  ;  Newark,  Sept. 
11,  1905,  III,  (1625). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


365 

Lespedeza  hirta  (L.)  Hornem.,  Clayton,  July  24,  1907, 1,  (1705). 

Lespedeza  virginica    (L.)    Britt.,  Newark,  Sept.   10,  1907,  III, 

(1730);  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,   (1988). 

This  species  is  very  common  and  widely  distributed  east  of  the 

Rocky  mountains  on  various  species  of  Lespedeza  and  has  been  shown 

to  be  autoecious  by  Arthur  (Jour.  Myc.  10:14.    1904).    The  aecial  form 

known  as  A.  leucostictum  having  been  produced  by  infecting  Lespedeza 

eapitata  with  teliospores  from  the  same  host. 

112.  Ubomyces  Medicaginis  Pass.  Thiim.  Herb.  Myc.  Oecon.  156.    1874. 
Nigredo  Medicaginis  Arth.  N.  Am.  Flora  7:256.     1912. 

On  Fabaceae: 

Medicago  lupulina  L.,  Wilmington,  June  22,  1889,  A.  Commons 
(920). 
The  aecia  of  this  species  in  Europe  have  been  shown  by  Schroeter 
(Krypt.   Fl.   Schl.  3':306.     1887)    and  by  Trebaux    (Ann.   Myc.  10:74. 
1912)  to  occur  on  various  species  of  t^uphorbia. 

No  aecia  in  America  have  been  found  which  can  be  referred  to  this 
species.  There  is,  however,  no  evidence  at  present  available  for  believ- 
ing the  American  species  different  from  the  European. 

113.  Uromyces  pedatatus   (Schw.)   Sheldon,  Torreya  10:90.     1910. 
Caeoma  pedatatum  Schw.  Trans.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  II.  4:293.     1832. 
Uromyces  Andropogonis  Tracy,  Jour.  Myc.  7:281.     1893. 

On  Violaceae:    I. 

Viola  lanceolata  L.,  Lewes,  April  25,  1908,   (2036). 
Viola  sagittata   L.,   Newark,   June   12,   1897,   F.    D.    Chester; 
Porters,  June  1908;  Lewes,  April  14,  1908. 
On  Poaceae:    II,  III. 

Andropogon  glomeratiis    (Walt.)    B.   S.   P.,   Selbyville,  Oct.  4, 

1907,  (1795,  1805,  1796,  1797),  (Barth.  Fungi  Columb.  3088); 

Lewes,  Nov.  16,  1907,   (1857). 

Andropogon  virginicus  L.,  Newark,  Sept.  10,  1907,  III,  (1732) ; 

Lewes,  April  23,  1908,  II,   (2037),  June  7,  1908,  III,   (2088). 

Dr.  J.  L.  Sheldon  (Torreya  9:55.     1909)  was  the  first  to  show  that 

in  West  Virginia  the  aecial  stage  of  this  species  on  Andropogon  occurred 

en  Viola,  having  obtained  successful  infection  resulting  in  aecia  by  using 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


366 

teliospores  from  Andropogon  virginicus  L.  Arthur  in  1909  (Mycol. 
2:229.  1910)  confirmed  the  results  of  Sheldon  by  obtaining  infection 
resulting  in  abundant  pycnia  on  Viola  cucullata  following  sowings  of 
teliospores  from  Andropogon  virginicus  sent  by  Sheldon  from  West 
Virginia. 

Long  (Phytopath.  2:165.  1912)  reports  successful  infection  of 
Viola  primulifolia  and  V.  cucullata  by  inoculation  with  teliosporic  ma- 
terial from  the  same  telial  host  used  by  Sheldon  and  Arthur.  Aecio- 
spores  from  V.  primulifolia  were  used  to  inoculate  the  telial  host  result- 
ing in  typical  uredinia  of  U,  pedatatUrS. 

114.     Uromyces  perigynius  Halsted,  Jour,  Myc.  5:11.     1889. 
Uromyces  caricina  E.  &  E.  Bull.  Torrey  Club  22:58.     1895. 
Uromyces  Solidagini-Caricis  Arth.  Jour.  Myc.  10:16.     1904. 
Nigredo  perigynia  Arth.  Result  Sci.  Congr.  Bot.  Vienna  334.     1906. 
On  Cyperaceae: 

Carex  scoparia  Schk.,  Newark,  Sept.   10,  1907,    (1731,   1734), 
April  5,  1908;  Felton,  Sept.  5,  1907,   (1743);  Collins  Beach, 
Oct.  1,  1907,   (1775). 
Carex  tribuloides  Wahl.,  Collins  Beach,  Oct.  1,  1907,   (1782); 
Felton,  Sept.  5,  1907,    (1739). 
This  species  is  correlated  with  a  Puccinia  occurring  on  Carex  and 
Dulichium  which  has  been   referred  to  under  various  specific  names. 
(See  P.  asteratum,)     The  species  are  morphologically  indistinguishable 
except  in  the  number  of  cells  in  the  teliospore. 

The  Uromyces  has  been  studied  in  culture  by  Arthur  and  Eraser. 
The  first  study  leading  to  an  understanding  of  the  species  was  made 
by  Arthur  (Jour.  Myc.  10:16.  1904)  who  used  telial  material  on  Carex 
varia  from  Indiana  and  obtained  infection  resulting  in  aecia  on  Solidago 
canadensis,  S,  serotina,  S,  flexicaulis  and  iS.  caesia.  The  results  were 
confirmed  in  1910  by  the  same  author  (Mycol.  4:21.  1912)  when  infec- 
tion resulting  in  aecia  was  obtained  on  S.  rugosa  using  telial  material 
on  C  deflexa  collected  in  Nova  Scotia  and  Maine.  This  species  was,  at 
this  time,  also  shown  to  have  aecia  on  Aster  by  successful  sowings  of 
teliospores  from  Carex  intumescens  collected  in  Nova  Scotia  on  A.  pani- 
culatus  and  from  C.  deflexa  from  Maine  on  A.  ericoides. 

Eraser    in    1911     (Mycol.    4:181.      1912)    successfully    infected    S. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


367 

rugosa  (?)  and  5.  bicolor  by  sowing  teliospores  from  Car  ex  deflexa  from 
Nova  Scotia.  Similar  results  were  obtained  on  Euthamia  graminifolia 
when  infected  with  teliospores  from  C,  scoparia  and  on  Solidago  sp. 
from  C  intumescens. 

Arthur  in  1912  (Mycol.  7:75.  1915)  reports  infection  of  Aster 
paniculatus  and  5.  canadensis  following  sowings  of  teliospores  from 
C.  intumescens  collected  in  New  York  and  in  1914  (Mycol.  7:83.  1915) 
on  A.  Tweedyi  from  C.  tribuloides  collected  in  Indiana. 

The  aecia  obtained  in  these  cultures  are  indistingfuishable  from  the 
aecia  resulting  from  sowings  of  the  correlated  Puccinia.  Field  collec- 
tions of  aecia  on  Aster,  Solidago,  etc.,  can  be  properly  referred  only 
when  close  observations  of  the  source  of  infection  are  made. 

115.  Uromyces  PLUMBARitJS  Peck,  Bot.  Gaz.  4:127.  1879. 
Uromyces  Oenotherae  Burrill,  Bot.  Gaz.  9:187.  1884. 
Nigredo  plumbaria  Arth.  N.  Am.  Flora  7:262.     1912. 

On  Onagraceae:    I. 

Oenothera  biennis  L.,  Newark,  May  1908,  I   (2266). 
Oenothera  laciniata  Hill,  Seaford,  June  4,  1908,  I   (2044). 

116.  Uromyces  Polemonii  (Peck)  Barth.  N.  Am.  Ured.  597.    1913. 
Aecidium  Polemonii  Peck,  Bot.  Gaz.  4:230.     1878. 

Uromyces  acuminatiis  Arth.  Bull.  Minn.  Acad.  Sci.  p.  35.     1883. 

Nigredo  Polemonii  Arih,  N.  Am.  Flora  7':231.     1912. 
On  Poaceae:    II,  III. 

Spartina  glabra   altemifolia    (Loisel)    Merr.,   Lewes,   Oct.    16, 
1907,  (1774,  1850). 

When  teliosporic  material  from  5.  cynosuroides  collected  in  Ne- 
braska was  used  by  Arthur  to  inoculate  Steironema  ciliata  (Jour.  Myc. 
12:25.  1906;  14:17.  3908)  aecia  developed.  In  1909  Arthur  (Mycol. 
2:229.  1910)  confirmed  the  results  with  5.  ciliata  and  also  records 
successful  infection  of  5.  lanceolata.  In  1910  (Mycol.  4:29.  1912)  the 
development  of  aecia  was  obtained  on  Polemonium  rep  tans  following 
sowings  of  teliospores  from  5.  cynosuroides  collected  in  North  Dakota 
and  Colorado. 

Fraser  in  1911  (Mycol.  4:186.  1912)  obtained  infection  resulting 
in  aecia  on  Arenaria  lateriflora  following  sowings  with  teliosporic  ma- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


368 

terial  from  Spartina  Michauxiana  and  on  Spergula  canadensis  from 
Spartina  glabra  var.  altemifolia  and  on  Spergula  canadensis  from 
Spartina  patens. 

In  1912  Arthur  again  conducted  cultures  (Mycol.  7:77.  1915)  and 
obtained  infection  and  development  of  aecia  on  Collomia  linearis  when 
telial  material  from  Colorado  was  used. 

From  these  successful  results,  taken  together  with  the  negative 
resultis  recorded  by  the  investigators  mentioned,  it  would  £vppear  that 
well  marked  biological  races  of  this  species  exist  or  that  distinct  species 
are  here  included. 

Orton  (Mycol.  4:202.  1912)  pointed  out  that  it  is  not  possible  to 
distinguish  this  species  from  Puccinia  Distichlidis  E.  &  E.,  the  telial 
stage  of  which  occurs  on  Spartina  sp.,  except  in  the  possession  of  one- 
celled  teliospores.  Arthur  in  1915  (Mycol.  8:136.  1916)  has  shown 
that  the  aecial  stage  of  the  Puccinia  develops  on  Steironema  and  is 
morphologically  identical  with  Aecidium  Polemonii,  thus  strengthening 
the  morphological  evidence  of  the  relationship  between  the  two  forms. 

117.  Uromyces  Polygoni   (Pers.)   Fuckl.  Symb.  Myc.  64,     1869. 
Puccinia  Polygoni  Pers.  Neues  Mag.  Bot.  1:119.     1794. 

Nigredo  Polygoni  Arth.  Result  Sci.  Congr.  Bot.  Vienna  344.     1906. 
On  Polygonaceae  : 

Polygonum  atnculare  L.,  Newark,  Aug.  17,  1907,  III,  (1712). 
Polygonum  erectum  L.,  Newark,  September  1888,  F.  D.  Chester, 
June  21,  1907,  II,   (1668). 

118.  Uromyces  Pontederiae  W.  Gerard,  Bull.  Torrey  Club  6:31.    1875. 
Nigredo  Pontederiae  Arth.  N.  Am.  Flora  7':238.     1912. 

On  Pontederiaceae  : 

Pontederia  cordata  L.,  Milford,  Sept.  1,  1892,  A.  Commons 
(1986). 
This  species  is  evidently  rather  rare,  having  been  recorded  in  North 
America  by  Arthur  (1.  c.)  in  but  four  states  on  the  Atlantic  coast  from 
New  York  to  Florida  and  in  Missouri.  Only  four  other  collections  are 
known  to  the  writer.  It  also  occurs  in  South  America.  This  species  is 
assumed  to  be  autoecious  though  no  aecia  have  been  found. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


369 

Hi).     Uromyces  proeminens  (DC.)  Pass.  ivab.  Fungi  Eur.  1795.    1873. 

Vredo  proeminens  DC,  Fl.  Fr.  2:236.     1805, 

Uromyces  Euphorbiae  C.  &  P.;  Peck,  Ann.  Rep.  N.  Y.  State  Mus. 
25:90.     1873, 

Nigredo  proeminens  Arth.  N.  Am.  Flora  7^:259.     1912. 

On    EUPHORBIACEAE: 

Euphorbia    maculata    L.,    Newark,    September    1905,     (1633), 
Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907,  (1695),  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,  (1980). 
Euphorbia  Preslii  Guss.,  Newark,  Sept.  14,  1907,  III,    (1630), 
Seaford,  July  9,  1907,  I,  (1666) ;  July  9,  1907,  II,  III,  (1655), 
Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,   (1994). 
That  this  species  is  autoecious  was  first  demonstrated  by  Arthur  in 
1899  (Bot.  Gaz.  29:270.     1900)  and  later  confirmed  by  the  same  author 
(Jour.   Myc.  8:51.     1902;   Bot.  Gaz.  35:12.     1903).     The  results,  how- 
ever, indicate  that  well  marked  biological  forms  are  present. 

120.  Uromyces  Rhyncosporae  Ellis,  Jour.  Myc.  7:274.     1893. 
Nigredo  Rhyncosporae  Arth.  Result  Sci.   Congr.   Bot.   Vienna  344. 

1906. 

On   CYPERACfiAE:    11,  III. 

Rynchospora  axillai^    (Lam.)    Britton,  Lewes,  Aug.   14,  1907, 

(1687). 
Rynchospora  glomerata    (L.)    Vahl.,    Selbyville,   Oct.    4,    1907, 
(1801,  1811);  Seaford,  Nov.  15,  1907,  (1768,  1769),  April  23, 
1908,  (2031);  Lewes,  Nov.  16,  1907,  (1856). 
All  cultures  so  far  attempted  with  this  species  have  yielded  negative 
results.     It  is  very  close  morphologically  to  Uromyces  perigynius  which 
has  been  shown  to  have  aecia  on  Aster  and  Solidago.     In  spite  of  the 
fact  that  attempts  to  infect  these  genera  by  Arthur  (Mycol.  7:65.   1915) 
were  unsuccessful,  the  writer  is  inclined  to  the  view  that  it  will  ulti- 
mately be  shown  that  this  species  has  its  aecia  on  Aster  and  Solidago. 

121.  Uromyces  Scirpi  (Cast.)   Bur  rill.  Par.  Fungi  111.  168.     1885. 
Uredo  Scirpi  Cast.  Cat.  PI.  Mars.  214.     1845. 

On  Ammiaceae:    I. 

Hydrocotyle  Canbeyi  C.  &  R.,  Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907,  I,   (1688), 
June  6,  1908,  (2090). 

24—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


370 

Stum   cicutaefolium   GmeL,   Wilmington,  July   11,   1890,   1,   A. 
Commons   (1488). 
On  Cyperaceae:    II,  III. 

Scirpus    americanus   Pers.,   Lewes,   Aug.    14,   1907,   II,    (1679, 
1689),  June  6,  1908,  (2091);  Selbyville,  Oct.  4,  1907,  (1806). 
Scirpus  fiuviatilis  (Torr.)  A.  Gray,  Collins  Beach,  Oct.  1,  1907, 
III,   (1787). 

In  Europe  P.  Dietel  (Hedwigia  29:149.  1890)  was  the  first  to 
successfully  connect  this  species  with  its  aecial  form.  He  showed  by 
cultures  that  aecia  are  produced  on  Sium  latifolium  and  Hippurus  vul- 
garis. Plowright  (Card.  Chron.  III.  7:682.  1890)  added  Glau^  mari- 
lima  as  an  aecial  host  of  this  species.  Bubak  in  Bohemia  (Cent.  Bakt. 
9':  926.  1902)  discovered  a  form  which  only  infected  Berula  angusiifolia. 
Further  cultures  carried  out  by  Klebahn  (Jahr.  Hamb.  Wiss.  Anst. 
20:33.    1903)  brought  out  new  hosts  and  interesting  biological  relations. 

In  America  Arthur  in  1906,  1907  and  1908  (Jour.  Myc.  13:199. 
1907;  14:17.  1908;  Mycol.  1:237.  1909)  showed  that  in  America  Cicuta 
maculata  was  an  aecial  host.  Fraser  (Mycol.  4:178.  1912)  confirmed 
Arthur's  work  using  telia  on  Scirpus  campestris  paludosus. 

The  aecidium  on  Hydrocotyle  Canbeyi  is  included  here  partly  on 
morphological  grounds  and  partly  on  field  observations.  As  noted  above 
the  writer  collected  at  Lewes,  on  Aug.  14,  1907,  the  aecidium  on  Hydro- 
cotyle. The  aecia  were  old  and  there  was  no  evidence  of  uredinia  or 
telia  of  P.  Hydrocotyles  (with  which  form  the  aecidium  has  previously 
been  combined)  on  any  of  the  affected  leaves  or  on  other  plants  in  the 
vicinity.  Surrounding  the  plants,  however,  were  plants  of  Scirpus 
americanus  abundantly  affected  with  the  uredinia  of  U,  Sdrpi,  Obser- 
vations and  collections  were  again  made  in  the  same  spot  on  June  6, 
1908,  when  aecia  were  again  found  in  abundance  showing  evidence  of 
having  been  mature  for  about  two  weeks.  A  few  culms  of  Scirpus  were 
growing  in  such  a  position  that  the  tips  were  hanging  immediately 
above  the  Hydrocotyle  plants  bearing  the  aecia.  On  these  tips  fresh 
uredinial  sori  of  U.  Scirpi  were  present.  No  infection  on  Scirpus  was 
found  elsewhere  at  that  date  though  the  plants  were  very  abundant 
over  a  wide  area. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


371 

122.  Uromyces  seditiosus  Kern,  Torreya  11:212.     1911. 

Aecidium  Plantaginia  Burrill,  Bull.  111.  Lab.  Nat.  Hist.  2:232.    1885. 

Nigredo  seditiosa  Arth.  N.  Am.  Flora  7:225.     1912. 
On  Poaceae: 

Aristida  sp.,  Lewes,  1908. 

Culture  experiments  reported  by  Arthur  (Bot.  Gaz.  35:17.  1903) 
prove  the  aecidial  stage  of  Uromyces  Aristidae  to  be  Aecidium  Planta- 
ginis.  He  used  telial  material  on  A.  oligantha  Michx.  from  Texas  and 
successful  infection  of  Plantago  Rugelii  was  obtained  followed  by  pycnia 
and  aecia. 

Field  observations  made  by  Arthur  and  Fromme  indicate  also  that 
Aecidium  Oldenlandianum  Ellis  &  Tracy,  which  occurs  on  various  spe- 
cies of  Houstonia  in  the  southern  states,  also  belongs  here  though  con- 
firming cultures  have  not  yet  been  made. 

123.  Uromyces  Silphii  (Burrill)  Arth.  Jour.  Myc.  13:202.     1907. 
Aecidium  Silphii  Sydow,  Ured.  1546.     1901. 

Nigredo  Silphii  Arth.  N.  Am.  Flora  7:239.     1912. 
On  Juncaceae: 

J  uncus  dichotomus  Ell.,  Sussex  Co.,  June  18,  1875,  A.  Commons. 

Juncus  tenuis  Willd.,  Lewes,  Aug.  14,  1907,   (1700) ;  Newark, 

Aug.  23,  1907,   (1714) ;  Sept.  1907,   (1823,  1824) ;   Selbyville, 

Oct.  4,  1907,   (1793,  1800). 

Arthur   (Jour.  Myc.  13:202.     1907;  14:17.     1908)   has  shown  that 

this  conunon  species  has  its  aecia  on  Silphium.    Using  telial  material  on 

J.   tenuis  from  Indiana,  West  Virginia  and  Nebraska,  five  successful 

infections  of  Silphium  perfoliatum  were  obtained,  all  of  which  resulted 

in  the  development  of  pycnia  and  aecia.     The  aecia  on  Silphium  have 

been  collected,  so  far  as  known  to  the  writer,  only  in  the  Mississippi 

Valley  from  Ohio  to  Wisconsin,  Kansas  and  Missouri,  on  three  species 

of  Silphium.    The  range  of  the  telial  collections  referred  here,  however, 

is  much  greater  including  nearly  the  entire  United  States  and  Canada 

except  the  south  Pacific  slope.    It  seems  probable  that  some  plants  other 

than  Silphium,  at  present  unrecognized,  also  serve  as  aecial  hosts  for 

this  species.     From  field  observations  it  seems  probable  that  certain 

species  of  Aster  serve  as  hosts  for  the  aecia  of  this  species  in  some 

localities. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


372 

This  species  is  distinguished  from  the  only  other  Uromyces  on 
Juncus  occurring  in  the  eastern  United  States  (U.  Junci-ejfusi  Syd.) 
which  occurs  commonly  on  J,  effusus,  by  the  number  and  position  of  the 
pores  in  uredospores.  In  U,  Silphii  there  are  two  superequatorial  pores; 
while  in  U.  Junci-effiisi  the  pores  are  3-4  and  equatorial. 

124.  Uromyces  Spermacoces  (Schw.)  Curt.  Cat.  PL  N.  Car.  123.    1867. 
Puccinia  Spermacoces  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:74.     1822. 
Nigredo  Spermacoces  Arth.  N.  Am.  Flora  7:266.     1912. 

On  Rubiaceae: 

Diodia  teres  Walt.,  Newark,  Sept.  18,  1905,  (1627) ;  Selbyville, 

Oct.  4,  1907,   (1934) ;  Cooch's  Bridge,  Sept.  18,  1915,  C.  0. 

Houghton. 

This  is  doubtless  an  autoecious  form  though  no  cultures  have  been 

conducted.    It  is  a  very  common  species  in  the  south  and  south  central 

States.     The  above  collections  are  near  the  northeastern  limits  of  its 

range. 

Unconnected  Forms. 

125.  Aecidium  Apocyni  Schw.  Schr.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:68.     1822. 
On  Apocynaceae: 

Apocynum  pubescens  L.,  Seaford,  July  9,  1907,  (1649,  1653), 
June  4,  1907,  (2053);  Clayton,  July  24,  1907,  (2253). 
This  Aecidium  is  known  otherwise  only  from  North  Carolina  and 
New  Jersey  on  the  above  host  and  on  A.  cannabinum  L.  only  from  the 
District  of  Columbia  and  North  Carolina  (according  to  Schweinitz). 
It  is  easily  separated  from  Aecidium  obesum  Arth.,  which  occurs  on 
A,  Sibiricum,  by  the  possession  of  a  firm  peridium  and  much  smaller 
aeciospores  with  thin  walls.  The  latter  agrees  with  A.  Cephalanthi 
Seym,  which  has  been  shown  by  Arthur  (Jour.  Myc.  12:24.  1906;  Mycol. 
1:236.  1909;  4:19.  1912)  to  be  the  aecial  form  of  Puccinia  Seymouri- 
ana  Arth.  with  uredinia  and  telia  on  Spartina. 

126.  Aecidium  Compositarum  Authors. 
On  Carduaceae: 

Rudbeckia  triloba  L.,  Naamans  Creek,  April  27,  1894,  A.  Com- 
mons. 
This  Aecidium  like  many  others  on  Compositae  is  doubtless  heter- 
oecious  and  may  belong  with  telia  on  some  Cyperaceous  or  Juncaceous 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


373 

host.     Since  its  exact  affinities  are  at  present  unknown  it  is  best  for 
the  present  referred  to  as  above.^ 

127.  Aecidium  Ivae  sp.  nov. 

0.  Pycnia  amphigenous,  crowded  in  yellowish  spots,  3-15  mm.  in 
diameter,  noticeable,  subepidermal,  light  yellow  to  light  chestnut-brown, 
punctiform,  80-160  by  95-160^,  ostiolar  filaments  up  to  SO^i,  long. 

1.  Aecia  usually  hypophyllous,  sometimes  amphigenous,  crowded  on 
spots  with  the  pycnia,  cupulate,  0.2-0.4  mm.  in  diameter;  peridium 
brownish  yellow,  recurved,  erose;  peridial  cells  rhomboidal  in  longitudial 
section,  19-27  by  35-51jx,  overlapping,  wall  5-7^  thick,  outer  wall  smooth, 
transversely  striate,  inner  wall  closely  and  coarsely  verrucose;  aecio- 
spores  globoid  or  ellipsoid  21-29  by  26-23{i;  wall  colorless  or  pale  yellow, 
2-3\i  thick,  finely  and  closely  verrucose. 

On  Ambrosiaceae: 

Iva  ovaria  Bartlett  (7.  frutescens  A.  Gray  not  L.),  Lewes, 
Aug.  14,  1907,  (1676). 
This  species  is  evidently  a  heteroecious  form  and  occurs  otherwise, 
so  far  as  is  known,  in  salt  marshes  along  the  Atlantic  coast  and  Gulf 
of  Mexico  in  Virginia,  Florida  and  Louisiana.  It  differs  from  Aecidium 
intermixtum  Pk.  (Puccinia  intermixta  Pk.)  in  the  larger  aeciospores 
and  in  the  fact  that  the  aecia  develop  from  a  limited  mycelium. 

128.  Aecidium  Uvulariae  Schw.  Nat.  Ges.  Leipzig  1:69.    1822. 
On  Convallariaceae: 

Uvularia  sessifolia  L.,  Seaford,  June  4,  1908,  (2059) ;  Cooch's 
Bridge,  May  25,  1915,  C.  O.  Houghton. 
The  above  Aecidium  is  scarcely  distinguishable  from  Aecidium 
Majanthae  Schum.  which  has  been  shown  by  European  investigators 
to  be  connected  with  uredinia  and  telia  on  Phalaris.  In  America  aecidia 
occurring  on  Salamonia,  Unifolium  and  Vagnera  have  been  similarly 
referred  to  P,  Majanthae  (Schw.)  Arth.  (P.  sessilis  Schw.)  though  no 
successful  cultures  have  been  made.     Since  slight  morphological  differ- 


*  Since  the  above  was  written  cultures  conducted  in  this  laboratory  and  reported  by 
Arthur  (Mycol.  9:307.  1917)  show  that  aecia  on  Rudbcckia  laciniata  are  genetically  con- 
nected with  uredinia  and  telia  on  Carex  referred  to  Uromyeca  pcrigyniua  (cf.  114).  He 
obtained  successful  infection  resulting  in  aecia  on  R.  laciniata  following  exposure  to 
germinating?  telia  on  Carcx  sparganioidea.  It  iu  therefore  probable  that  the  collection 
listed  here  from  Delaware  on  R.  triloba  should  be  similarly  referred. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


374 


ences  exist  between  the  form  on  Uvularia  and  those  mentioned  above 
it  seems  desirable  to  retain  it  as  a  separate  species  for  the  present. 

129.     Uredo  Andromedae  Cooke,  DeToni  in   Sacc.   Syll.   Fung.  7:853. 
1888. 
On  Ericaceae: 

Pieris  mariana    (L.)    Benth.  &  Hook.,  Wilmington,  Oct.  1891, 

A.  Commons  (in  E.  &  E.  N.  Am.  Fungi  2717). 
Xolisma  ligustrina  (L.)  Britt.,  Selbyville,  Oct  4,  1907,  (1941). 
This  species,  included  by  Arthur  in  Melampsoropsis  Cassandrae 
(P.  &  C.)  Arth.  (N.  Am.  Flora  7:119.  1907)  is  clearly  not  that  species, 
as  the  urediniospores  are  echinulate.  Its  affinities  are  probably  with 
Pucciniastrum.  The  ostiolar  cells  of  the  peridium  however  are  not  well 
developed  and  it  seems  best  to  retain  it  under  the  above  name  for  the 
present. 


Index  to  Species. 


Aecidium  Apocyni  125. 
asperifolii  41. 
asterum  43. 
Berberidis  79. 
Caladii  100. 
Callirrhoes  62. 
Cephalanthi  125. 
Compositarum  126. 
compositarum  Bidentis  75, 
compositarum  Eupatorii  56. 
compositarum  Xanthii  46. 
Fraxini  60. 
fuscum  33. 
Geranii-maculati  81. 
giganteum  7. 
Helianthi-mollis  61. 
Hepaticum  98. 
Hibisciatum  62. 
houstoniatum  107. 
Hyperici-frondosi  109. 


Impatientis  64. 
intermixtum  127. 
Ivae  127. 
leucostictum  111. 
Ludwigiae  73. 
Lycopi  38 
Lysimachiae  67. 
macrosporum  68. 
Majanthae  128. 
Melampyri  37. 
Myrtilli  14. 
Napaeae  62. 
Nesaeae  68,  72. 
nitens  19. 
obesum  125. 
Oldenlandianum  122. 
Osmorrhizae  78. 
Oxalidis  89. 
Pammelii  77,  104. 
Pentastemonis  37. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


375 


Plantaginis  122. 

Polemonii  116. 

Pteleae  95. 

punctatum  98. 

pustulatum  83. 

pyratum  24. 

Pyrolae  15. 

Ranunculi  55. 

Khamni  85. 

rubellum  86. 

Sambuci  87. 

Sanguinolentum  81. 

Silphii  123. 

Smilacis  88. 

Sphaeralceae  62. 

Stellingiae  104. 

Tussilaginis  59. 

Urticae  93. 

Uvulariae  128. 

Violae  94. 
AUodus  claytoniata  50. 

Ludwigiae  73. 
Aregma  triarticulatum  31. 
Ascophora  disciflora  29. 
Caeoma  Agrimoniae  12. 

Botryapites  20. 

(Aecidium)  claytoniatum  50. 

Fraxinatum  60. 

germinale  22. 

Hibisciatum  62. 

interstitiale  19. 

lysimachiatum  67. 

(Aecidium)  Myricatum  25. 

nitens  19. 

pedatatum  113. 

urticatum  93. 
Chrysomyxa  albida  10. 


Coleosporium  cameum  1. 

delicatulum  2. 

Elephantopodis  3. 

Ipomoeae  4. 

Pini  5. 

Rubi  10. 

Solidaginis  2,  6. 

Vemoniae  1. 
Cronartium  cerebrum  7, 

Comandrae  8. 

pyriforme  8. 

Quercuum  7. 
Frommea  Duchesneae  30. 

obtusa  31. 
Gallowaya  Pini  5. 
Gymnoconia  interstitialis  19. 

Peckiana  19. 
Gymnosporangium  biseptatum  20, 
27. 

Blasdaleanum  25. 

Botryapites  20. 

clavariaeforme  21. 

clavipes  22. 

conicum  26. 

EUisii  25. 

fraternum  27. 

germinale  22. 

globosum  23. 

Juniperi-virginianae  24. 

macropus  24. 

Myricatum  25. 

nidus-avis  26. 

transformans  20,  27. 
Hyalopsora  Polypodii  9. 
Kuehneola  Duchesneae  30. 

obtusa  31. 

Uredinis  10. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


376 


Kunkelia  nitens  19. 
Lycoperdoa  caryophyllinum  101. 

epiphyllum  59. 

poculiforme  79. 
Melampsora  Bigelowii  11. 
Melampsoropsis  Cassandrae  129. 
Nigredo  appendiculata  99. 

Caladii  100. 

Eragrostidis  102. 

fallens  103. 

graminicola  104. 

Halstedii  105. 

Hedysari-paniculati  106. 

houstoniata  107. 

Hyperici-frondosi  109. 

Junci-effusi  110. 

Lespedezae-procumbentis  111. 

Medicaginis  112. 

perigynia  114. 

plumbaria  115. 

Polemonii  116. 

Polygon!  117. 

Pontederiae  118. 

proeminens  119. 

Rhyncosporae  120. 

seditiosa  122. 

Silphii  123. 

Spermacoces  124. 
Oidium  Uredinis  10. 
Peridermium  acicolum  6. 

balsameum  17,  18. 

carneum  1. 

cerebrum  7. 

delicatulum  2. 

fusiforme  7. 

intermedium  3. 

Ipomoeae  4. 


montanum  6. 

Peckii  13,  14. 

pyriforme  8. 
Phragmidium  americanum  28. 

disciflorum  29. 

Duchesneae  30. 

Potentillae-canadensis  31. 

triarticulatum  31. 
Pileolaria  Toxicodendri  32. 
Podisoma  Ellisii  25. 
Polythelis  fusca  33. 
Puccinia  Agropyri  34,  92. 

Aletridis  35. 

alternans  34. 

americana  57. 

Andropogi  37. 

Andropogonis  37,  57,  83. 

Anemones- Virginianae  36. 

angustata  38. 

Anthoxanthi  39. 

argentata  74. 

Asparagi  40. 

asperifolii  41. 

asteratum  114. 

Asteris  42,  84. 

asterum  43. 

Atkinsoniana  87. 

Batesiana  44. 

Bolleyana  87. 

bullata  45. 

canaliculata  46. 

Caricis  93. 

Caricis-Asteris  43. 

Caricis-Erigerontis  43. 

Caricis-Solidaginis  43. 

Caricis-strictae  47. 

Chrysanthemi  48. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


377 


cinerea  34. 

Cirsii  49. 

Cirsii-lanceolati  51. 

claytoniata  50. 

Clematidis  92. 

Cnici  51. 

compositarum  f.  Cnici  altissimi 

49. 
convolvuli  52. 
coronata  85. 
Cryiwtaeniae  53. 
Cyani  54. 
dispersa  41. 
Distichlidis  116. 
Dulichii  43. 
Eatoniae  55. 
Eleocharidis  56. 
EUisiana  57. 
emaculata  58. 
epiphylla  59. 
extensicola  43. 
fraxinata  GO. 
fusca  33. 
graminis  79. 
Hedysari-paniculati  106. 
Helianthi  61. 
Helianthi-mollis  61. 
Hibisciatum  62. 
Hieracii  63. 
Hydrocotyles  121. 
Impatientis  64. 
intermixta  127. 
Iridis  65. 

Lespedezae-procumbentis  111. 
Limosae  67. 
Lobeliae  CG. 
Ludwigiae  7C. 


lysimachiata  67. 
macrospora  68,  88. 
Majanthae  128. 
malvacearum  69. 
Mariae-Wilsoni  50. 
marylandica  70. 
Maydis  89. 
Menthae  71. 
microica  53. 
minutissima  72. 
Muhlenbergiae  62. 
nemoralis  37. 
Nesaeae  73. 
nolitangeris  74. 
obliterata  34. 
obtecta  75. 
orbicula  76. 
Osmorrhizae  78. 
Pammelii  58,  77. 
Panici  58,  77,  104. 
Peckiana  19. 
perminuta  64. 
Phaseoli  var.  Taraxaci  91. 
Phlei-pratensis  79. 
Phragmites  86. 
Pimpinellae  78. 
poarum  59. 
poculiformis  79. 
Podophylli  80. 
Polygoni  82,  117. 
Polygoni-amphibii  81. 
Polygoni-Convolvuli  82. 
Pruni-spinosae  98. 
pustulatum  83. 
recedens  84. 
Rhamni  85. 
rubella  86. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


378 


rubigo-vera  64. 

Sambuci  87. 

sessilis  128. 

Seymouriana  125. 

Smilacis  88. 

Sorghi  89. 

Sparganioides  60. 

Spermacoces  124. 

subnitens  90. 

Taraxaci  91. 

Thompsonii  87. 

tomipara  34,  92. 

tosta  62. 

tripustulata  19. 

triticina  92. 

Urticae  93. 

urticata  93. 

Vemoniae  45. 

Violae  94. 

vulpinoidis  43. 

Windsoriae  95. 

Xanthii  96. 
Pucciniastrum  Abieti-chumaencrii 
16. 

Agrimoniae  12. 

Epilobii  ih, 

minimum  13. 

Myrtilli  14. 

pustulatum  16. 

Pyrolae  15. 
Pvavenelia  epiphylla  97. 
Koestelia  aurantiaca  22. 

Botryapites  20,  27. 

pyrata  24. 

transformans  27. 
Septoria  mirabilis  18. 


Sphaeria  canaliculata  46. 

epiphylla  97. 
Tranzschelia  punctata  98. 
Tremella  clavariaeformis  21. 
Tubercularia  camea  1. 
Uredinopsis  Atkinsonii  17. 

mirabilis  18. 
Uredo  Andromedae  129. 

appendiculata  99. 

Betae  Convolvuli  52. 

Bigelowii  11. 

Cyani  54. 

Elephantopodis  3. 

fallens  103. 

Hieracii  63. 

Ipomoeae  4. 

Iridis  65. 

minima  13. 

Muelleri  10. 

Phragmites  86. 

Pimpinellae  78. 

Polypodii  9. 

proeminens  119. 

pustulata  16. 

Scirpi  121. 

Solidaginis  6. 
Uromyces  acuminatus  116. 

Andropogonis  113. 

appendiculatus  99. 

Aristidae  122. 

Caladii  100. 

caricina  114. 

Caricis  47. 

caryophyllinus  101. 

digitatus  105. 

Eragrostidis  102. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


379 


Euphorbiae  119. 
fallens  103. 
grraminicola  104. 
Uromyces  Halstedii  105. 
Hedysari-paniculati  106. 
houstoniatus  107. 
Howei  108. 

Hyperici-frondosi  109. 
Junci-effusi  110,  123. 
Lespedezae-procumbentiF  111. 
Medicaginis  112. 
Oenotherae  115. 
Panici  104. 
pedatatus  113. 
Peltandrae  100. 

Host 
Abies  balsamea  16,  17,  18. 

lasiocarpa  16. 

pectinata  16. 
Adoxa  moschatellina  74. 
Agrimonia  hirsuta  12. 
Agropyron  repens  34,  79. 
Agrostis  alba  79. 

hyemalis  64. 

perrenans  64. 
Aletris  farinosa  35. 
Althaea  rosea  69. 
Allium  cepa  40. 
Ambrosia  trifida  96. 
Ambrosiaccae  96,  127. 
Amelanchier  Amelanchier  20,  27. 

canadensis  20,  21,  22,  26,  27. 

erecta  21,  22,  26. 

intermedia  20,  21,  22,  26,  27. 

vulgaris  26. 
Ammiaceae  53,  70,  78,  121. 


perigynius  114,  120,  126. 
Phaseoli  99. 
Uromyces  plumbarius  115. 
Polemonii  116. 
Polygoni  117. 
Pontederiae  118. 
proeminens  119. 
Rhyncosporae  120. 
Scirpi  121. 
seditiosus  122. 
Silphii  110,  123. 
Solidagini-Caricis  114. 
Spermacoces  124. 
Toxicodendri  32. 
Trifolii  103. 

Index. 
Amygdalaceae  98. 
Amygdalus  communis  98. 

Persica  98. 
Anchusa  officinalis  41. 
Andropogon  furcatus  83. 

glomeratus  113. 

scoparius  37,  57,  83. 

virginicus  37,  57,  113. 
Anemone  coronaria  98. 

quinquefolia  33,  98. 

ranunculoides  98. 

virginiana  36. 
Anthoxanthum  odoratum  39. 
Apocynaceae  125. 
Apocynum  cannabinum  125. 

pubescens  125. 

Sibiricum  125. 
Araceae  100. 
Arenaria  lateriflora  116. 
Arisaema  dracontium  100. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


380 


triphyllum  100. 
Aristida  oligantha  122. 
Aronia  arbutifolia  22,  27. 

nigra  27. 
Arrhenatherum  eiatius  85. 
Afclepiadaceae  108. 
Asclepias  pulchra  108. 

Syriaca  108. 
Asparagus  ofTicinalis  40. 
Aster  acuminatus  43. 

conspicuous  6. 

ericoides  114. 

laevis  geyeri  6. 

paniculatus  6,  42,  114. 

salicifolius  42. 

Tweedyi  114. 
Atriplex  hastata  90. 
Avena  sativa  85. 
Azalea  viscosa  13. 
Balsaminaceae  64,  74. 
Berberidaceae  80. 
Berula  an gusti  folia  121. 
Bidens  comata  75. 

frondosa  75. 
Boraginaceae  38. 
Bursa  Bursa  pastoris  90. 
Calamagrostis  canadensis  85. 
Callirrhoe  involucrata  62. 
Campanulaceae  66. 
Caprifoliaceae  87. 
Carduaceae  1,  2,  3,  6,  42,  43,  44,  45, 
46,  48,  49,  51,  54,  56,  61,  84, 
126. 
Carduus  altissima  49. 

lanceolatus  49,  51. 
Carex  albolutescens  43. 

aquatilis  72,  93. 


aristata  93. 

bullata  87. 

comosa  68. 

deflexa  114. 

festucacea  43. 

filiformis  72. 

Frankii  87. 

hirta  93. 

intumescens  114. 

Leersii  43. 

limosa  67. 

lupulina  87. 

lurida  87. 

Muhlenbergii  43. 

radiata  43. 

riparia  93. 

rosea  43. 

scoparia  114. 

stipata  43,  93. 

straminca  43. 

stricta  47,  93. 

teretiuscula  72. 

tribuloides  114. 

trichocarpa  87. 

trisperma  43. 

varia  114. 

vulpinoidea  43. 
Caryophyllaceae  101. 
Castanopsis  chrysophylla  7. 
Centaurea  cyanus  54. 
Chamaecyparis  thyoides  20,  25,  27. 
Chenopodiaceae  90. 
Chenopodium  album  90. 
Chimaphila  maculata  15. 
Chrysanthemum  sinense  48. 
Cichoriaceae  63,  76,  91. 
Cicuta  maculata  121. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


381 


Claytonia  virginica  50. 
Cleome  spinosa  90. 
Collomia  linearis  116. 
Comandra  pallida  8. 

Umbellata  8,  83. 
Convallariaceae  40,  128. 
ConVolvulaceae  4,  52. 
Convolvulus  sepium  52. 
tiracca  virginiana  97. 
Crataegus  cerronus  21. 

coccinea  23. 

Douglasii  23. 

mollis  24. 

oxycantha  21,  23. 

phaenopyrum  23. 

pinnatifida  24. 

Pringlei  23,  26. 

punctata  21,  22. 

tomentosa  20,  21,  23. 
Cydonia  vulgaris  22,  23,  26. 
Cyperaceae  38,  43,  46,  47,  68,  75, 

87,  93,  114,  120,  121. 
Cyperus  cylindricus  46. 

esculentus  46. 

filiculmis  46. 

lancastriensis  46. 

ovularis  46. 

refractus  46. 

strigosus  46. 

Torreyi  46. 
Decodon  verticillata  68,  72. 
Deringia  canadensis  53. 
Dianthus  caryophyllus  101. 
Diodia  teres  124. 
Distichlis  spicata  90. 
Dryopteris  Thelypteris  17. 
I*uchesnea  Indica  30. 


Dulichium  arundinaceum  43. 
Eatonia  pallens  55. 

pennsylvanica  55. 
Eleocharis  palustris  56. 
Elephantopus  carolinianus  3. 
Elymus  canadensis  64. 

striatus  64. 

virginicus  64. 
Epilobium  angustifolium  16. 

coloratum  16. 
liragrostis  pectinacea  102. 
Ericaeae  13,  129. 
Erigeron  annuus  43. 
Erysimum  asperum  90. 
Eupatorium  perfoliatum  56. 

purpureum  56. 

rotundifolium  56. 
Euphorbia  corollata  77,  104. 

maculata  77,  119. 

marginata  104. 

Preslii  119. 
Euphorbiaceae  119. 
Euthamia  graminifolia  2,  43,  114. 
Fabaceae  97,  99,  103,  106,  111,  112. 
Pagaceae  7. 
Felix  fragilis  9. 
Fraxinus  lanceolatus  60. 

viridis  60. 
Gaylussacia  baccata  14. 

resinosa  14. 

Geraniaceae  81. 
Geranium  maculatum  81. 
Glaux  maritima  121. 
Helianthus  angustifolius  61. 

annuus  61. 

decapetalus  61. 
Heliopsis  helianthoides  44. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


382 


scabra  44. 
Hepatica  acutiloba  98. 

Hepatica  98. 
Hibiscus  militaris  62. 

mocheutos  62. 
Hieracium  scabrum  63. 
Hippurus  vulgaris  121. 
Homalocenchrus  oryzoides  105. 
Houstonia  coerulea  107. 
Hydrocotyle  Canbeyi  121. 
Hypericaceae  109. 
Hypericum  mutilum  109. 
Impatiens  aurea  64,  74. 

biflora  74. 
Ipomoea  hederacea  4. 

pandurata  4,  52. 

purpurea  4. 
Iridaceae  65. 
Iris  versicolor  65. 
Iva  frutescens  127. 

ovaria  127. 
Juncaceae  110,  123. 
J  uncus  dichotomus  123. 

effusus  110,  123. 

tenuis  123. 
Juniperaceae  20,  22,  24,  25,  26. 
Juniperus  communis  21. 

sibirica  21,  22. 

virginiana  22,  23,  24,  26. 
Koellia  mutica  71. 
Labiatae  71. 
Larix  decidua  11. 

Europea  11. 

occiden  talis  11. 
Leersia  oryzoides  105. 
Lepidium  apetalum  90. 

virginicum  90. 


Lespedeza  capitata  111. 

frutescens  111. 

hirta  111. 

virginica  111. 
Liliaceae  35. 
Lobelia  puberula  66. 

syphilitica  66. 
Lorinseria  areolata  18. 
Ludwigia  polycarpa  73. 

sphaerocarpa  73. 

virgata  73. 
Lycopus  americanus  38. 

arvensis  41. 

communis  38. 

virginicus  38. 
Lysimachia  terrestris  67. 

thyrsiflora  67. 

vulgaris  67. 
Lythraceae  72. 
Malaceae  21,  22,  23,  24,  27. 
Malus  coronaria  23,  26. 

lowensis  26. 

Malus  22,  23,  26. 
Malva  rotundifolia  69. 
Malvaceae  69. 
Medicago  lupulina  112. 
Meibomia  Dillenii  106. 

laevigata  106. 

Marylandica  106. 

obtusa  106. 

paniculata  106. 

stricta  106. 
Melampyrum  americanum  37. 

lineare  37. 
Molina  caerulea  37. 
Monarda  punctata  71. 
Muhlenbergia  diffusa  62. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


383 


glomerata  62. 

mexicana  62. 

racemosa  62. 

Schreberi  62. 

sobalifera  62. 
Myrica  cerifera  25. 
Myricaceae  25. 
Nabalus  sp.  76. 
Oenothera  biennis  115. 

laciniata  115. 
Oleaceae  60. 
Onagraceae  16,  73,  115. 
Onoclea  sensibilis  18. 
Oxalis  cymosa  89. 
Panicum  capillare  58. 

virgatum  77,  104. 
Peltandra  virginica  100. 
Pentstemon  alpinus  37. 

hirsutus  37. 

pubescens  37. 
Persicaria  muhlenbergii  81. 

pennsylvanicum  81. 
Phalaris  caroliniana  85. 
Phaseolus  vulgaris  99. 
Phleum  pratense  79. 
Phragmites  Phragmites  86. 
Pieris  mariana  129. 
Pinaceae  5,  6,  7. 
Pinus  contorta  6. 

echinata  7. 

palustris  1. 

ponderosa  8. 

rigida  2,  6. 

taeda  1,  7. 

virginiana  5,  7. 
Plantago  Rugelii  122. 


Poa  annua  59. 

fertilis  59. 

nemoralis  59. 

pratensis  59,  79. 

trivialis  59. 
Poaceae  34,  37,  39,  41,  55,  57,  58, 
59,  60,  62,  64,  77,  79,  83,  85, 
86,  89,  90,  92,  95,  102,  104,  105, 
113,  116,  122. 
Podophyllum  peltatum  80. 
Polemonium  reptans  116. 
Pclygonaceae  81,  82,  90,  117. 
Polygonum  aviculare  90,  117. 

Convolvulus  82. 

emersum  81. 

erectum  117. 

pennsylvanicum  81. 
Polypodiaceae  9,  17,  18. 
Pontederia  cordata  118. 
Pontederiaceae  118. 
Portulaceae  50. 
Potentilla  canadensis  31. 
Primulaceae  67. 
Prunus  americana  98. 

cerasus  98. 

divaricatus  98. 

pumila  98. 

serotina  98. 

spinosa  98. 
Ptelea  trifoliata  95. 
Pyrolaceae  15. 
Pyrus  coronaria  24. 

lowensis  24. 

Malus  24. 
Quercus  coccinea  7. 

densifolia  echinoides  7. 

digitata  7. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


384 


glandulosa  7. 

lobata  7. 

marylandica  7. 

nigra  7. 

Phellos  7 

rubra  7. 

serrata  7. 

variabilis  7. 

velutina  7. 
Ranunculaceae  33,  36,  55,  98. 
Ranunculus  abortivus  55. 
Rhamnus  caroliniana  85. 

carthartica  85. 

lanceolata  85. 
Rhodora  canadensis  13. 
Rhus  radicans  32. 
Rosa  Carolina  28. 

humilis  28. 

sp.  29. 
Rcsaceae  10,  12,  19,  28,  29,  30,  31. 
Rubiaceae  107,  124. 
Rubus  allegheniensis  19. 

frondosus  10,  19. 

nigrobaccus  10. 

saxatilis  19. 

villosus  19. 
Rudbeckia  triloba  126. 
Rumex  crispus  86. 

hydrolapathum  86. 

obtusifolium  86. 
Rynchospora  axillaris  120. 

glomerata  120. 
Salicaceae  11. 
Salix  amygdaloides  11. 

Bebbiana  11. 

cordata  mackenzieana  11. 


nigra  11. 
Sambucus  canadensis  87. 

pubens  87. 
Sanicula  canadensis  70. 
Santalaceae  8. 
Sapindaceae  32. 
Sarcobatus  vermiculatus  90. 
Schizachyrium  scoparium  37,  83. 
Scirpus  americanus  75,  121. 

atrovirens  38. 

campestris  paludosus  121. 

cyperinus  38. 

fluviatilis  75,  121. 

georgianus  38. 
Scrophulariaceae  37. 
Secale  cereale  41,  79. 
Senecio  aureus  84. 
Silphium  perfoliatum  123. 
Sisyrinchium  gramineum  107. 
Sium  cicutaefolium  121. 

latifolium  121. 
Smilaceae  68,  88. 
Smilax  glauca  88. 

hispida  68. 

rotundifolia  68,  88. 
Solidago  altissima  43. 

bicolor  114. 

caesia  114. 

canadensis  6,  114. 

flexicaulis  114. 

graminifolia  2. 

missouriensis  6. 

rugosa  6,  43,  114. 

sempervirens  43. 

serotina  114. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


385 


Sophia  incisa  90. 
Sorbus  americana  23. 
Spartina  cynosuroides  60,  116. 

glabra  60. 

glabra  altemifolia  116. 

Michauxiana  116. 

patens  116. 

polystachya  60. 

stricta  60. 
Spergula  canadensis  116. 
Sphaeralcea  incana  62. 

lobata  62. 
Sphenopholis  nitida  55. 

pallens  F5. 
Sporobolus  asperifolius  62. 
Steironema  ciliata  116. 

lanceolata  116. 
Strophostyles  helvola  99. 

umbellata  99. 
Taraxacum  Taraxacum  91. 
Triandeum  virginicum  109. 
Tricuspis  .<;eslerioides  95. 
Trifoliura  incarnatum  103. 

pratense  103. 
Triticum  vulgare  79,  92. 
Tsuga  canadensis  13,  14. 
Tussilago  farfara  59. 

Purdue  University,  Lafayette,  Ind. 


Urtica  dioica  93. 

gracilis  93. 
Uvularia  sessifolia  128. 
Vacciniaceae  14. 
Vaccinium  canadense  14. 

vacillans  14. 
Vemonia  altissima  45. 

crinita  1. 

fasciculata  1. 

gigantea  1. 

noveboracensis  1,  45. 
Viola  affinis  94. 

cucuUata  57, 113. 

fimbriatula  57. 

hirsutula  57. 

Labradorica?  94. 

lanceolata  94,  113. 

Nuttallii  57. 

papilionacea  57. 

primulifolia  113.    * 

sagittata  57,  113. 
Violaceae  94,  113. 
Washingtonia  brevistylis  78. 
Xanthium  canadense  46. 

echinatum  46. 

sp.  96. 
Xolisma  ligustrina  129. 
Zea  Mays  89. 


25—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


THE  TREES  OF 
WHITE  COUNTY,  INDIANA 

WITH  SOME  REFERENCE  TO 
THOSE  OF  THE  STATE 


A  Thesis 

Submitted  to  the  Faculty  of  Purdue  University 

by 

Louis  Frederick  Heimlich 

Candidate  for  the  Degree  of  Master  of  Science 
June,  1916 


is  papei  wu  fabmitted  for  publication  in  the  1916  Proceedings,  bat  the  publication  was  deferred  one 
ear  on  account  of  the  many  long  papers  sabmitted  n  1916.— Editok 


(387) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


CONTENTS. 


PAtJFS 

I .     Introduction 391 

II .     Geographical  and  Physical  Aspects 392 

III.  The  Native  Species  of  Trees. 395 

Authenticity  and  Acknowledgements 395 

List  of  Native  White  County  Trees 396 

Species  Likely  to  be  Found  Later . .  398 

Comparison  with  Number  of  State  Trees 400 

Some  Cultivated  Trees  in  the  County 401 

IV.  Distribution 401 

General  Intimation 401 

Some  Trees  of  the  Dune  Area  of  Ind 403 

The  Oaks 405 

The  White  Oaks 407 

The  Black  Oaks 430 

The  Hickories 433 

Revised  List  for  the  State 436 

Trees  Restricted  to  the  Tippecanoe 439 

Two  New  Species?  and  a  New  Variety  for  the  State 447 

Species  Generally  Distributed  Qver  the  County 452 

V.     Economic  Uses 462 

History  of  White  County  Sawmills 463 

Data  on  White  County  Timber 454 

Timber  in  U.  S.    How  Indiana  Ranks 466 

VI.     Summary 469 

VII.     Bibliography 469 

PLATES. 

Plate                      I.    Political  Map,  White  County 393 

II.    Map,  Roads  Travelled 402 

III.    Illustration,  White  County  Acorns 406 

Illi.    General  Distribution  of  Oaks  and  Hickories 408 

IV-XI.    Illustrations,  Quercus  alba  Leaves 410-418 

(388) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


389 


PAGES 

Plate        XII-XIII.     Illustrations,  Q.  bicolor  Leaves 419-420 

XIV,  XI Vi,  XV.     Illustrations,  Q.  palustris  Leaves 421-423 

XVI.    Range  Map,  Q.  alba 424 

XVII.    Range  Map,  Q.  macrocarpa ^25 

XVIII.    Range  Map,  Q.  bicolor 426 

XIX.    Range  Map  Q.  imbricaria 427 

»         XX.    Range  Map,  Q.  palustris 428 

XXI.    Range  Map,  Q.  coccinea 429 

XXII.    Illustration,  Q. ? 432 

XXIII.  Map,  Tippecanoe  Trees 440 

XXIV.  Range  Map,  Betula  lutea 444 

XXV.    Illustration,  Crataegus  albicans? 446 

XXVI.     Illustration,  Salix  missouriensis 448 

XXVI 1.    Range  Map,  Salix  missouriensis 450 

XXVIII.    Map,  General  Distribution 451 

XXIX.    Range  Map,  Salix  amygdaloides 453 

XXX.    Range  Map,  Malus  ioensis 456 

XXXI.    Range  Map,  Viburnum  lentago 460 

XXXII.    Range  Map,  V.  prunifolium 461 

TABLES. 

1 .  Crops,  Fertility,  Returns  of  White  County  Soils 394 

2.  Comparison  of  State  and  County  Species  by  Number 400 

3.  White  County  Lumber 464 

4.  White  County  Lumber  and  Railroad  Ties 464 

5.  White  County  Lumber 465 

6.  White  County  Lumber  and  Railroad  Ties 465 

7.  White  County  Lumber  and  Railroad  Ties 465 

8.  Comparison  of  Lumber  Cut  by  Species,  Softwoods 467 

9.  Comparison  of  Lumber  Cut  by  Species,  Hardwoods 467 

10.  Rank  of  Indiana  in  Total  Lumber  Cut 467 

11 .  Rank  of  Indiana  by  Species  of  Lumber  Cut 468 

12.  Number  of  Indiana  Sawmills  Ranked  according  to  Output 468 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


390 

LISTS.  PAGES 

1.  Native  White  County  Trees 396 

2.  Species  Likely  to  be  Found  in  White  County 398 

3.  Partial  List  of  Cultivated  Trees 401 

4. ,  Some  Trees  of  the  Dune  Area  of  Indiana 403 

5.  White  County  Oaks  and  Hickories  Plate  Ill-i 408 

6.  Revised  List  of  Hickories  for  Indiana 436 

7.  Trees  Restricted  to  the  Tippecanoe  River  Banks »  440 

8.  General  Distribution  of  Species  over  the  County 451 


I 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


391 


The  Trees  op  White  County,  Induna,  with  Some 
Reference  to  Those  of  the  State. 


For  a  long  time  botanists  have  been  busy  describing  species  and 
working  out  their  distribution  over  the  surface  of  the  earth.  Dendrolo- 
gists,  more  particularly,  have  been  contented  with  the  description  and 
distribution  of  trees.  From  studies  and  reports  made  thus  far,  the 
general  ranges  of  trees  and  most  flowering  plants  are  fairly  well  known. 
One  might  well  suspect  what  plants  grow  in  a  certain  area,  but  definite 
reports  are  to  be  preferred. 

Now  the  significant  way  to  study  vegetation  is  from  an  ecological 
standpoint.  Completeness  is  not  attained  by  noting  the  species  of  a 
certain  group  within  any  political  boundary.  Armed  with  the  reliable 
information  of  a  geologist,  the  distribution  and  number  of  species  and 
individuals,  from  unicellular  plants  in  the  soil  and  water  to  the  most 
complex  flowering  types,  should  be  worked  out  by  the  taxonomist-ecol- 
ogist.  This  of  course  would  take  time,  but  taking  each  county,  or 
stream  and  then  working  in  the  intervening  spaces,  as  a  unit  for  the 
working  field,  the  completed  report  would  show  a  new  natural  map 
with  a  far  greater  meaning  than  isolated  and  incomplete  reports  coming 
from  various  sections.  This  would  become  very  far-reaching,  taking 
into  account  plant  diseases,  and,  being  but  a  step  to  animal  parasites 
on  plants,  an  account  of  the  complete  fauna  of  the  region  as  well  as  a 
complete  flora  as  hinted  at  above,  would  be  still  more  desirable.  We 
should  then  have  some  really  effective  Life  Zones. 

A  complete  flora  for  the  State  is  the  aim  of  the  committee  on  the 
Biological  Survey  of  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Science.  To  my  knowledge 
there  is  no  similar  committee  or  thought  of  a  complete  fauna  for  the 
State. 

The  Indiana  State  Board  of  Forestry  is  interested  in  determining 
just  what  species  of  trees  grow  in  Indiana  and  just  what  their  ranges 
in  the  State  are.  In  the  Eleventh  Annual  Report  of  the  State  Board 
of  Forestry,  1911,  is  to  be  found  the  most  authentic  record  of  Indiana 
trees  up  to  the  present  time.  There  is  no  pretense  that  the  report  is 
complete  either  for  the  total  number  of  species  in  the  State,  or  much 
less  so  for  the  ranges  of  those  reported.  Some  counties  have  been  very 
thoroughly  worked,  others  only  partly,  and  some  not  at  all — at  least 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


392 

reports   are   lacking:.      White    County   happens   to   fall    into   this   last 
category. 

Under  these  circumstances  the  general  aim  of  this  thesis  has  been 
a  systematic  report  on  the  Native  Trees  of  White  County,  their  species 
and  relative  numbers.  Other  related  features  have  been  included  as 
the  result  of  a  growing  interest  in  the  subject.  The  matter  of  ecology 
was  thought  of  seriously,  but  due  to  the  lack  of  time  and  the  as  yet 
unavailable  soil  report  of  the  county*,  this  part  has  been  reduced  to  a 
very  brief  review  of  the  physical  and  geographical  aspects  of  the 
county,  and  a  consideration  of  the  Tippecanoe  River  trees,  with  the 
general  distribution  of  trees  over  the  county.  As  regards  the  economic 
phases  of  White  County  trees,  some  isolated  but  interesting  figures  were 
obtained.  In  this  connection  some  historical  data  attaches  another  bit 
of  interest.  Comparisons  with  State  and  national  distribution  by  the 
use  of  maps,  illustrate  clearly  among  other  things  the  need  for  further 
work  as  well  as  the  correction  of  past  limits  or  errors.  Attention  is 
also  called  to  a  new  list  of  Hickories  for  the  State  according  to  Sar- 
gent's latest  determinations.  Besides  other  miner  features  which  need 
not  be  mentioned  here,  I  have  been  fortunate  enough  to  include  a  new 
variety  of  willow  for  the  State,  and  possibly  a  new  species  of  that 
same  genus. 

Geographical  and  Physical  Aspects  op  White  County. 

Before  proceeding  at  once  to  the  primary  aim  of  this  thesis,  the 
report  of  species  and  relative  numbers,  I  have  deemed  it  desirable  to 
point  out  certain  other  features,  giving  a  general  notion  of  the  county, 
topography,  fertility  of  soil,  drainage,  transportation  facilities,  etc. 

White  County  is  located  in  the  northwestern  part  of  Indiana  and 
possesses  some  of  the  best  agricultural  land  in  the  world.  The  soil  is 
especially  fertile  in  the  southwestern  half  of  the  county,  which  is  prairie 
land.  Black,  rich  soil  in  this  area  produces  monster  crops  of  com  and 
oats,  with  nearly  all  the  ground  surface  taken  up  in  cultivation.  Com- 
paratively less  timber  is  to  be  found  in  this  region  and  very  likely  the 
region  has  always  been  the  less  wooded  part  of  the  county — being  for- 
merly a  vast  sea.  Boulders  of  the  glacial  age  in  many  cases  have  been 
removed  to  the  fence  rows. 

*  Soil  Survey  made  by  U.  S.  Bureau  of  Soils,  Summer  1916. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


393 


Plate  I. 

WHITE  COUNTY. 

507  Square  Miles — 324,480  Acres. 


Low  sand  ridges  are  especially  characteristic  of  Honey  Creek  and 
Monon  townships  and  also  parts  of  Princeton.  This  area  is  very 
densely  covered  with  forests  of  oak  (almost  exclusively  Q.  alba,  palustris, 
velutina,  coccinea). 

In  the  environs  of  the  Tippecanoe  River  and  eastward  the  topog- 
raphy is  rather  more  rugged.  Very  good  farm  lands  are  also  found  in 
this  area.  Formerly  almost  every  foot  of  this  region  was  heavily 
wooded. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


394 

The  following  statistics,  taken  from  the  U.  S.  1910  Census,  give 
some  notion  of  the  fertility  and  returns  of  White  County  soils. 

(Table  1.) 

Total  land  area  in  acres 324,480 

Acres  under  cultivation: 

Cereals 165,106 

Hay    28,550 

Potatoes 750 

All  other  crops 893 

Small  fruits 35—      195,334 

Per  cent  of  total  land  area  cultivated 60 

Number  of  farms 2,091 

Average  number  of  acres  per  farm 150.4 

Value  of  all  crops  (except  nuts,  etc.) $2,951,637 

Expense : 

Labor $184,833,  or  88% 

Fertilizer 23,758,  or  12%—      208,591.00 

Net  crop  returns $2,743,146.00 

Net  returns  per  acre 14.04 

Land  value  per  acre 77.69 

Per  cent  of  net  per  acre  to  value  per  acre 18.2 

The  total  population  in  1910  (U.  S.  Census)  was  17,602  with  only 
6,511  as  being  included  in  towns. 

Nearly  all  of  the  507  square  miles  in  White  County  are  drained 
by  the  Tippecanoe  River  and  its  tributaries.  The  county  as  a  whole  is 
rather  flat  and  much  dredging  and  tile-ditching  has  been  done  in  recent 
years.  Parts  of  natural  streams  have  been  dredged  several  times  and 
also  extended.  Possibly  in  this  case  more  erosion  would  be  gladly  wel- 
comed. The  Tippecanoe  is  a  geologically  young  and  very  beautiful 
watercourse,  fed  by  clear  lake-water  at  its  head  in  Noble  County  and 
by  numerous  springs  along  its  banks. 

Since  national  and  local  interests  are  crystallizing  more  and  more 
in  the  direction  of  natural  beauty  spots — parks  and  pleasure  resorts — 
I  suggest  that  very  appealing  tracts  can  be  found  along  the  Tippecanoe, 
especially  north  of  Monticello,  near  Norway  and  up  toward  Buffalo. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


395 

Transportation  facilities  in  the  county  are  excellent.  The  Monon 
and  Pennsylvania  Lines  cross  the  county.  A  system  of  good  roads  is 
in  existence,  about  400  miles  of  which  are  macadamized  or  made  of 
gravel. 

Limestone  quarries  are  located  at  Monon  and  recently  other  deposits 
have  been  found  several  miles  southwest  of  Reynolds.  Good  clay  de- 
posits and  tile  factories  at  Chalmers,  Seafield  and  Wolcott  have  been 
in  operation  for  a  number  of  years. 

A  far  more  accurate  and  much  more  detailed  statement  covering 
the  part  here  alluded  to  will  be  found  in  the  forthcoming  report  of  the 
U.  S.  Bureau  of  Soils  for  White  County,  which  will  be  ready  for  dis- 
tribution within  a  few  months. 

The  Native  Species  of  Trees. 

Parts  of  the  summer  of  1915  and  the  fall  of  1914  were  spent  in 
making  collecting  trips  over  various  parts  of  the  county.  The  regular 
routine  work  was  done  single-handed,  and  the  specimens  disposed  of  and 
mounted  according  to  standard  methods  now  form  a  permanent  part  of 
my  private  herbarium. 

Realizing  very  thoroughly  that  the  work  of  determination,  espe- 
cially in  some  genera,  is  not  such  a  self -satisfying  matter  to  any  careful 
botanist,  I  endeavored  to  make  my  collection  as  authentic  as  possible. 
Any  specimen  still  remaining  in  doubt  is  either  entirely  omitted  or 
expressly  given  as  doubtful. 

Specimens  in  the  Purdue  Herbarium  and  many  specimens  of  Oaks 
and  Hickories,  collected  last  summer  by  Mr.  Deam  and  Prof.  Hoffer 
and  recently  determined  by  Sargent,  were  available  for  comparison. 
Dr.  Sargent  has  verified  or  determined  all  the  specimens  of  Salix,  Hico- 
ria,  Crataegus,  Malus,  and  many  Oaks.  Mr.  F.  W.  Pennell,  Assistant 
Curator  of  the  New  York  Botanical  Garden,  has  determined  specimens 
of  Fraxinus  and  Comus.  Mr.  W.  W.  Eggleston  of  the  Bureau  of  Plant 
Industry  was  also  consulted.  I  am  permitted  to  add  Salix  longifolia 
variety  argophylla  (determined  by  Sargent)  to  my  list,  by  the  courtesy 
of  Mr.  C.  C.  Deam  of  Bluffton,  Indiana,  who  was  ever  ready  to  help. 
Acknowledgments  are  also  due  Professor  G.  N.  Hoffer  of  Purdue,  not 
least  of  which  are  for  a  kindly  interest  in  the  work.  Grateful  appre- 
ciation to  Dean  Stanley  Coulter,  under  whom  this  thesis  was  written, 
is  here  expressed,  for  help,  encouragement  and  his  stamp  of  approval. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


896 

Thanks  are  also  tendered  to  Mr.  Ed  Newton  of  Monticello,  Indiana,  for 
historical  accounts,  and  to  my  sister  Frieda  for  data  in  connection 
with  Part  V. 

As  designated  in  the  1911  Report  of  the  State  Board  of  Forestry, 
"the  number  of  trees  included  in  this  list  is  wholly  arbitrary,"  so  I 
have  included  some  species — small  trees,  or  large  shrubs,  not  considered 
in  that  report.  Further  consideration  of  each  species  is  deferred  to 
another  part  of  this  paper. 

The  following  is  a  complete  list  of  all  species  collected: 

(List  1.) 

Native  White  County  Trees. 

Juniperus  virginiana  L. 
Salix  amygdaloides  Anders, 
interior  Rowlee. 
humulis  Marsh, 
discolor  Muhl. 
nigra  Marsh, 
missouriensis  Bebb. 
longifolia  var.  argophylla  Sarg. 
Populus  alba  L. 

grandidentata  Michx. 
heterophylla  L. 
tremuloides  Michx. 
deltoides  Marsh. 
Juglans  nigra  L. 

cinerea  L. 
Hicoria  cordiformis   (Wang)   Britton. 
ovata  (Mill)  Britton. 
laciniosa  (Michx)   Sarg. 
alba  (L)  Britton. 
ovata  var.  fraxinifolia  Sarg. 
Corylus  americana  Walt. 
Carpinus  caroliniana  Walt 
Ostrya  virginiana   (Mill)   Willd. 
Betula  lutea  Michx. 
Fagus  grandifolia  Ehrh. 


r 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


397 


Quercus  alba  L. 

macrocarpa  Michx. 

bicolor  Willd. 

Muhlenbergii  Englm. 

rubra  L. 

palustris  DuRoi. 

coccinea  Muench. 

ellipsoidalis  E.  J.  Hill. 

velutina  Lam. 

imbricaria  Michx. 
Ulmus  americana  L. 
fulva  Michx. 
Celtis  occidentalis  L. 
Morus  rubra  L. 
Toxylon  pomiferum  Raf. 
Liriodendron  tulipifera  L. 
Asimina  triloba   (L)   Dunal. 
Sassafras  variifolium  (L)  Karst. 
Hamamelis  virg^iniana  L. 
Plantanus  occidentalis  L. 
Malus  malus  (L)   Britton. 

ioensis  (Wood)  Britton. 
Amelanchier  canadensis   (L)   Med. 
Crataegus  crus-galli  L. 

pruinosa  (Wendl)  Koch, 
albicans  Ashe.  ? 
calpedendron  (Ehrh)  Britton. 
Prunus  americana  Marsh. 

serotina  Ehrh. 
Cercis  canadensis  L. 
Gleditsia  triacanthos  L. 
Gymnocladus  dioica  (L)  Koch. 
Robinia  Pseudo-acacia  L. 
Zanthoxylum  americanum  Mill. 
Ptelea  trifoliata  L. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


398 

Rhus  glabra  L. 
copallina  L. 
hirta  (L)  Sudw. 
Ilex  verticillata  (L)  A.  Gray. 
,Staphylea  trifolia  L. 
Acer  negundo  L. 

sacchanim  Marsh, 
saccharinum  L. 
nigrum  Michx. 
Aesculus  glabra  Willd. 
Tilia  americana  L. 
Nyssa  sylvatica  Marsh. 
Comus  altemifolia  L. 

stolonifera  Michx. 
asperifolia  Michx. 
femina  Mill, 
florida  L. 
Fraxinus  americana  L. 

pennsylvanica  Marsh. 
Cephalanthus  occidentalis  L^ 
Vibumam  Lentago  L. 

pruni folium  L. 
Sambucus  canadensis  L. 

It  may  and  likely  will  be  necessary  to  add  a  few  species  not  included 
in  the  above  to  make  the  list  complete.  Such  probable  species  occurring 
in  the  county  are  considered  in  the  list  dealing  with  the  details  of  each 
species.    The  following  is  merely  a  suspected  list  of  those  species. 

(List  2.) 

Species  Likely  to  Be  Found  in  White  County. 

Salix  alba  L. 

lucida  Muhl. 
Hicoria  microcarpa  (Nutt)   Britton. 

glabra  (Mill)   Britton. 
Alnus  rugosa  (DuRoi)  Spreng. 
Crataegus  margarette  Ashe, 
succulenta  Schra. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


399 

Acer  rubrum  L. 

Fraxinus  quadrangulata  Michx. 

nigra  Marsh. 
Moms  alba  L. 

It  is  stated  in  the  1911  Report  (p.  87)  that  "it  is  believed  that 
about  one-half  of  our  trees  are  found  in  nearly  every  county  of  the 
State."  In  that  report  forty-seven  genera  with  125  species  of  trees  are 
considered.  The  following  table  compares  the  number  of  species  for 
each  genus  as  given  in  the  report,  with  the  number  of  the  same  species 
in  the  same  genus  for  White  County.  Other  species  in  the  same  genus 
not  reported  are  added  in  a  third  column.  Varieties  and  species  of  still 
other  genera  are  included  in  other  columns. 

Recalling  the  statement  referred  to  above,  it  will  be  seen  that  White 
County  has  representatives  of  over  half  the  genera  and  about  "one-half" 
the  species,  there  being  33  out  of  47  genera  represented,  with  62  species. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


400 


TABLE  II. 


Table  Comparing  Number  of  Genera  and  Number  of  Their  Species  Reported  for  Indiana,  with 
Number  of  Same  Genera  and  Same  Species  for  White  County. 


Gkncb. 


Pinus 

Larix 

Tsuga 

Taxodium  . . . . 

Thuja 

JuniperuB 

Salix 

Populus 

Juglans 

Hicoria 

Carpinus 

Ostrya 

Betula 

Alnufl 

FagUB 

Castanea 

OuercuB 

Ulmus 

Celtis 

Moms 

Toxylon 

MapoUa 

Linodendron . 

Asimina 

Saasaf  ras 

Liquidamber 

Platanus 

Malus 

Amelanchier.. 

Crataegus 

Pninus 

Ccrcis 

Gleditsia 

Gyronocladus 
Robinia 

Ailanthus 

Ilex 

Acer 

AcMnilus 

TilU 

Nyssa 

Comus 

Dioepyrufl .  .  . . 

Fraxinus 

Forestiera . . . 
Catalpa 

Vibumam . . 
Total 


^[>ecie8 

for 
Indiana. 


3 
1 

1 
1 
1 
1 
4 
5 
2 
7 
1 
1 
1 
2 
1 

17 
4 
3 
2 
1 
1 
1 
1 
1 

1 
2 

18 
4 

1 

2 


125 


^;)ecie8 

for 

White  Co. 


0 
0 
0 
0 
0 

2 
5 
2 
4 

1 

1 
0 

1 
0 
10 
2 

1 
1 
0 

1 

1 
0 

1 
1 

4 

2 

1 
1 
1 


Other  Species 

in  White 

County  not 

Given  in  1911 

Report. 


4  and  1  variety. 


4  and  1  variety. 


9  and  2  varietira. 


Species 
of 

Other 
General 
Included. 


Corylus 1 


Hamamelis. ...  1 


Zanthoxylum..! 
Ptelea 1 


Rhus 1 

Staphyiea 1 


Cephalanthos. 


SambucuB 


Total  number  of  Genera:    Indiana,  47;  White  County,  34. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


401 

Below  is  appended  a  partial  list  of  cultivated  trees  known  to  exist 
in  White  County. 

(List  3.) 

Partial  List  of  Cultivated  Species  of  Trees  in  White  County, 

Omitting  the  Usual  Orchard  Trees. 

Gingko  biloba Gingrko  or  Maidenhair  Tree. 

Thuja  occidentalis  L Arbor  Vitae. 

Chamaecyparis  obtusa? Cypress. 

Picea  abies  (L)  Karst Norway  Spruce. 

Larix  larcina  (DuRoi)  Koch Larch-Tamarack. 

Populus  nigra  L Black  Poplar. 

var.  italica  DuRoi Lombardy  Poplar. 

Castanea  dentata  (Marsh)  Borkh Chestnut. 

Aesculus  Hippocastanum  L Horse-chestnut. 

Ailanthus  glandulosa  Desf Tree-of-Heaven. 

Acer  palmatum Japanese  Maple. 

Acer  spicatum  Lam Mountain  Maple. 

Rhus  cotinoides  Nutt Smoke  Tree. 

Pyrus  americana  (Marsh)   DC American  Mountain  Ash. 

Vibumam     opulus     L.     var.     americanum 

(Mill)  Ait Cranberry  Tree. 

Diospyrus  virginiana  L Persimmon. 

Catalpa  speciosa  Warder Catalpa. 

catalpa  (L)  Karst Catalpa. 

Kaempferi Japanese  Dwarf  Catalpa. 

Betula  alba  L European  White  Birch. 

IV.    DISTRIBUTION. 
1.   General  Intimation. 

As  noted  previously,  White  County  embraces  507  square  miles  or 
324,480  acres.  I  have  often  been  over  much  of  this  area  and  have  in 
a  general  way  for  a  long  time  known  most  of  the  trees.  In  making  a 
definite  report,  however,  a  definite  procedure  seems  to  be  desirable. 

The  map  on  page  402  shows  the  territory  covered  during  the  last 
summer.  The  red  lines  represent  the  actual  highways  travelled,  mostly 
by  bicycle,  some  by  automobile.     Many  side  trips  were  made  on  foot. 

26—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


402 

As  I  recall  it,  many  days  were  totally  unfit  for  the  collector  owing: 
to  the  continuous  heavy  rains.  As  a  result  of  this  many  thickets  were 
miry  or  filled  with  water.  As  a  further  consequence,  the  mosquito  hordes 
too  often  interfered  with  the  pleasure  of  the  work  if  nothing  else.  Such 
experiences,  more  or  less  trivial,  must  be  evident  to  most  collectors  and 
serve  only  to  hint  at  other  difiiculties  besides  those  of  determination. 

In  attempting  to  say  something  about  the  distribution  of  each  spe- 
cies in  the  county,  references  are  made  to  the  general  distribution  and 

Plate  II. 
WHITE  COUNTY. 

Red  Lines  Show  Actual  Roads  Traveled  in  Collecting  Specimens. 


i 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


403 

the  reported  distribution  in  the  State.  Some  maps  covering  these  fea- 
tures reveal  several  matters  of  interest.  First,  it  becomes  evident  that 
the  definition  of  the  general  limits  of  any  species  is  a  big  task,  always 
changing,  and  a  graphical  representation  of  a  number  of  species  for 
Indiana  shows  quite  clearly,  among  other  things,  that  some  counties 
have  been  quite  thoroughly  worked,  whereas  others  have  had  little  or 
no  attention  at  all.  Elkhart,  Benton,  Clinton,  Jasper,  Newton,  Ohio, 
Perry,  Pike,  Pulaski,  Rush,  Switzerland,  Tipton,  Vanderburgh,  Warrick, 
Whitley  and  White  Counties  are  not  mentioned  in  a  single  published 
report.  As  the  maps  show,  the  counties  bordering  on  the  Wabash  River 
and  extending  in  a  continuous  line  from  Posey  to  Steuben  County,  have 
been  the  most  thoroughly  worked,  as  have  Wells  County  (by  Deam), 
the  group  of  Delaware,  Jay,  Randolph  and  Wayne  (by  Phinney),  Jef- 
ferson (by  Coulter),  Clark  (Baird  and  Taylor),  area  of  New  Albany, 
Floyd  (Clapp),  Hamilton  (Wilson),  and  Franklin  (Meyncke).  (See 
Range  maps  pp.  424-429,  444,  450,  453,  456,  460,  461.) 

Nearly  two  decades  ago  Dr.  Cowles  of  the  University  of  Chicago 
made  an  ecological  study  of  the  shores  of  Lake  Michigan.  The  results 
of  his  investigations  were  published  in  the  Botanical  Gazette.  Though 
none  of  these  contain  a  definite  list  of  plants  for  the  borders  of  the 
Indiana  Dune  area  on  Lake  Michigan,  I  have  been  able  to  pick  out  a 
number  of  trees  mentioned  in  the  articles  as  occurring  in  that  area. 
And  since  these  references  seem  to  have  had  no  acknowledgments  in 
later  records,  I  include  a  list  of  trees  below,  taken  mostly  from  the 
Botanical  Gazette,  Vol.  27,  No.  4,  April,  1899.  Most  of  the  species 
occur  at  Dune  Park  in  Porter  County. 

(List  4.) 

Some  Trees  of  the  Dune  Area  of  Indiana. 

Pinus  strobus  L. 

Banksiana  Lamb. 
Abies  balsamea  (L)  Mill. 
Tsuga  canadensis  (L)   Carr. 
Thuja  occidentalis  L. 
Juniperus  virginiana  L. 
communis  L. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


404 

Salix  glaucophylla  Bebb. 

adenophylla  Am.  auth.,  not  Hook. 

humilis  Marsh. 
Populus  monilifera  Ait.  (P.  deltoides  Marsh). 

balsamifera  L. 
Juglans  cinerea  L. 
Ostrya  virginiana   (Mill)   K.  Koch. 
Betula  payrifera  Marsh. 
Fagus  ferruginea  Ait.   (F.  grandifolia). 
Quercus  coccinea  tinctoria  A.  DC.  (Q.  velutina  Lam.). 

alba  L. 
Ulmus  fulva  Michx. 
Celtis  occidentalis  pumila  Muhl. 
Sassafras  officinale  Nees  and  Eberm. 
Hamamelis  virginiana  L. 
Amelanchier  canadensis  (L)  Med. 
Prunus  pumila  L. 

virginiana  L. 
Ptelea  trifoliata  L. 
Rhus  canadensis  Marsh. 

copallina  L. 
Acer  saccharinum  L. 
Tilia  americana  L. 
Comus  stolonifera  Michx. 

fiorida  L. 
Fraxinus  americana  L. 
Viburnam  acerifolium  L. 

The  Range  maps  included  for  the  distribution  of  some  selected 
species  indicate  the  opportunity  for  someone  to  make  a  careful  collection, 
an  accurate  determination  and  a  report,  covering  one  or  more  counties, 
either  to  the  State  Board  of  Forestry  or  the  chairman  of  the  Committee 
on  the  Indiana  Botanical  Survey. 

When  reports  for  all  counties  are  complete  it  will  be  interesting  to 
note  from  just  what  counties  certain  species  are  actually  absent  and  to 
seek  the  reason  for  this  absence  in  terms  of  ecology  or  otherwise. 

Besides  the  matter  of  distribution  in  itself,  I  have  endeavored  to 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


405 

add  other  details  of  more  or  less  importance.  The  following,  then,  is  a 
brief  consideration  of  each  species  collected  in  White  County — first  the 
Oaks,  next  the  Hickories,  a  study  of  the  Tippecanoe  flora,  followed  by 
the  Willows  and  other  species  generally  distributed  over  the  county. 

2.   The  Oaks. 

The  Oaks  constitute  the  most  important  trees  in  White  County  in 
point  of  utility  and  quality  as  well  as  in  number  of  species  in  any  one 
genus  represented,  or  as  regards  the  number  of  individuals  in  the  genus. 

Seventeen  species  of  oaks  have  been  reported  for  Indiana.  This  is 
the  number  contained  in  both.  Coulter's  Flora  and  in  Beam's  1911  Re- 
port. The  former,  however,  lists  Quercus  texana  Buckley  (Texan  Red 
Oak— Gibson,  Posey,  Knox— Dr.  Schneck?)  and  Q.  Phellos  L.  (Willow 
oak — Gibson,  Posey,  Knox) — omitting  Quercus  Schneckii  Britton 
(Schneck's  oak),  and  Q.  ellipsoidalis  E.  J.  Hill    (Hill's  oak). 

Quercus  Schneckii  Britton  is  a  species  yet  in  doubt  (Deam).  It 
may  be  referable  to  Q.  texana,  but  the  new  flora  of  Britton  and  Brown 
says  it  "has  been  confused  with  Q.  texana."  It  closely  resembles  Quercus 
rubra  L.  and  may  supplant  the  latter  to  an  unaware  extent.  Thus  far 
it  has  been  reported  from  Bartholomew  (Elrod) ;  Gibson,  Knox,  Posey 
and  Vermillion  (Schneck);  Knox  (Ridgway) ;  Posey  and  Wells  (Deam). 
"It  is  believed  that  it  is  more  or  less  frequent  along  the  Wabash  and  its 
tributaries,"  and  so  may  occur  in  White  County  along  the  Tippecanoe 
or  southeastern  part  of  the  county. 

Quercus  phellos  L.  references  for  Indiana  have  been  changed  to 
Q.  imbricaria  Michx.     (See  Deam,  1911  Report,  pp.  91-92.) 

Quercus  ellipsoidalis  E.  J.  Hill  was  described  (E.  J.  Hill,  Bot.  Gaz. 
27:204,  1899)  after  Coulter's  Catalogue  was  published. 

Other  oaks  (Q.  ilicifolia  Wagn.  and  Q.  nigra  L.)  have  been  reported 
for  our  area,  but  for  apparently  sufficient  reason  have  been  referred  to 
other  species,  being  in  most  cases  variant  forms.     (1911  Report  p.  91.) 

Ten  out  of  the  seventeen  species  reported  for  Indiana  were  found  in 
White  County.  Of  the  seven  remaining  species,  Q.  lyrata  Walt.,  Q. 
Michauxii  Nutt.,  Q.  falcata  Michx.,  are  quite  restricted  to  the  extreme 
southwestern  counties;  Q.  stellata  Wang.,  Q.  Prinus  L.,  and  Q.  mary- 
landica  Muench.,  are  southern  or  local;  the  distribution  of  Q.  Schneckii 
is  discussed  above. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


406 


Plate  III. 

TYPICAL  ACORNS 

Of  Oaks  Indigenous  to  White  County. 


Q.maorooarpa  Miohx. 
Q.alba  L.  Q.Muhlenbergii  Englm. 


Q. 

bioolor 
Willd. 


Q.palU8tri8  Muench. 


Q. rubra  L. 


Q.ooccinett  Wang. 


Imbrlcarla 

Michx. 


Q.velutina  Lam. 


Q.ellipBOldalia 
E.J.Rlll. 


(See  p. 53) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


407 

Just  exactly  how  generally  some  of  the  ten  species  collected  are 
distributed  over  the  county  I  am  unable  to  say.  This  matter  will  be 
discussed  with  each  species  separately. 

The  White  Oaks. 

Four  species  of  the  White  Oak  group  appear  in  White  County. 
These  in  point  of  number  of  individuals,  rank  as  follows:    (1)  Q.  alba  L. 
(2)   Q.  macrocarpa  Michx.     (3)  Q.  bicolor  Willd.     (4)  Q.  Muhlenbergii 
Engelm. 
Quercus  alba  L.    White  Oak.     (Sp.  PL  996-1753.) 

The  White  Oak  is  one  of  the  most  numerous  and  perhaps  the  most 
valuable  tree  of  the  county.  The  largest  of  these  trees,  as  well  as  many 
others  of  less  maturity,  have  long  ago  disappeared.  Some  fairly  large 
trees  are,  however,  still  to  be  found.  The  species  is  quite  generously 
distributed  over  the  entire  county. 

The  White  Oak  is  readily  distinguished  from  other  oaks  in  spite  of 
the  fact  that  it  shows  much  diversity,  in  nearly  all  parts,  among  indi- 
viduals of  its  own  small  group  or  species.  The  bark  character  varies 
on  many  trees.  On  most  younger  trees  and  on  many  older  ones  it  is 
comparatively  thin  and  flaky.  On  not  infrequent  large  trees  it  is  rather 
deeply  fissured  with  a  thickness  approaching  three  inches  or  more.  The 
outer  appearance  of  the  bark  on  these  trees  is  a  peculiar  gray  as  a 
rule,  the  inner  part  being  a  rich  brown. 

The  leaves  vary  considerably  in  size  and  shape.  Specimen  No.  289 
(p.  410),  is  the  typical  form.  Nos.  443  and  257,  also  No.  446,  show  slight 
variation  in  size  and  shape.  The  leaves  in  No.  283  show  a  tendency 
toward  less  deep  lobing  and  the  one  with  the  lobes  more  divergent  are 
still  further  amplified  in  No.  467,  giving  a  hint  toward  the  leaf  char- 
acter of  Q.  stellata  Wang.  No.  292  is  simply  a  large  shallow  lobed 
form.  The  lobes  of  Nos.  469  (p.  417)  and  282  (p.  418)  are  extremely 
shallow  and,  by  an  amateur,  the  latter  may  be  almost  mistaken  for  the 
Swamp  White  Oak  (Q.  bicolor  Willd.).* 

A  decided  difference  is  also  noted  in  the  thickness  of  twigs  and  size 
of  the  winter  buds  in  different  individuals.  In  some,  Nos.  469  (p.  417) 
and  282    (p.  418),  the  twigs  are  especially  thin  with  correspondingly 


•See  Q.  bicolor  p.  411  for  distineruishing  leaf  characters. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


408 


Plate  Illi. 
WHITE  COUNTY. 


General  Distribution  of  the  Oaks  and  Hickories 


HICORIA 

/  cordlforml8(Wang)Brlt. 
^  ovata  (Mill)  Brit. 

3  ovata  var.fraxlnifolia  Sarg, 

4  laclniosa  (Michx.f.)  Sarg« 

5  alba  (L)  Brit. 
4  unidentified. 


(Thefle  ranges  are 
incomplete) . 


QUERCtJS 

'  alba  L. 

imacrooarpa  Tilchx. 
^bicolor  Willd. 
)Muhlenbergli  Kngelm. 

rubra  L. 

paluetriA  Tiuench. 
icoccinea  Mucnch. 

ellip80idali«  E.J.Hill, 
^velutina  Lara. 

imbricaria  Michx. 
r ^   (See  p. 52). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


409 

small  buds,  due  perhaps  mostly  to  general  shaamg  of  the  trees  from 
which  these  specimens  were  taken.  In  others,  of  which  No.  446  (p.  414) 
is  an  example,  the  twigs  are  particularly  heavy  and  large.  This  speci- 
men also  shows  a  decidedly  vigorous  type  of  acorn  with  a  long  stalk 
and  a  broad  cup. 

Some  of  the  differences  are  so  conspicuous  and  constant  for  a  num- 
ber of  individuals  that  there  appears  to  be  several  races  or  varieties  in 
this  species. 

Scarcely  more  than  a  third  of  the  counties  (33)  have  reported  this 
well-known  tree.  It  would  be  interesting  for  others  while  reporting  this 
species  to  note  if  these  racial  characteristics,  if  such,  are  found. 

Quercus  macrocarpa  Michx,  Mossy-cup,  Blue  or  Bur  Oak,  Mossy-cup 
White  Oak,  Scrub  Oak.  (Hist  Chen.  Am.  2  pi.  23,  1801.  Q.  olivae- 
formis  Michx.  f.  1812.) 
The  Bur  Oak  is  more  widely  spread  than  perhaps  any  other  oak  in 
the  United  States.  It  has  been  reported  from  30  counties  in  Indiana. 
In  White  County  it  occurs  chiefly  along  the  Tippecanoe  and  the  lower 
stretches  of  the  creeks  emptying  into  that  river.  Not  many  trees  were 
noted  west  of  the  Monon  Railroad.  A  single  tree  of  fair  size,  about 
three  miles  directly  north  of  Reynolds,  enjoys  an  isolation  by  a  radius 
of  several  miles.  A  number  of  this  species  are  to  be  found  about  two 
miles  south  of  Reynolds.  I  very  much  doubt  its  occurrence  in  Princeton 
Township  and  likewise  for  Westpoint.  It  does,  however,  occur  west  of 
these  places,  for  I  have  seen  it  in  abundance  along  Carpenter  Creek  in 
Jasper  County,  near  Remington.  It  is  usually  found  in  moist,  rich  soil, 
near  or  some  small  distance  from  streams.  Specimens  were  taken  from 
trees  near  the  Ward  School,  three  and  three-fourths  miles  southeast  of 
Reynolds.  The  Bur  Oak  leaves  an  impression  of  a  rather  coarse  appear- 
ing tree  throughout,  easily  distinguished  from  all  other  oaks. 

Querctis  bicolor  Willd,     Swamp  White  Oak.     (Neue  Schrift  Geo.  Nat. 

Fr.  Berlin  3:396.  1801),  (Quercus  Prinus  platanoides  Lam.  1873. 

Q.  platanoides  Sudw.  1893). 

The  range  of  the  Swamp  White  Oak  in  the  United  States  is  much 

more  restricted  than  that  of  the  two  other  white  oaks  here  reported. 

In  Indiana  it  is  reported  from  25  counties    (scattering).     It  is  very 

much  less  frequent  in  White  County  than  other  oaks.     Several  trees  of 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


410 


Plate  IV. 


QuerouB  alba  L. 

lTo.289.     8epteBft>er  7.1914. 

R«ynoldB,  Ind.  In  Bar- 
donner'e  woode.  Light 
sandy  eoll. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


411 

small  size  are  to  be  found  in  Ward's  thicket  about  one  mile  south  of 
Reynolds.  Other  trees  of  this  species  were  noted  south  of  the  Dyer 
school,  five  and  three- fourths  miles  northeast  of  Brookston,  near  the 
Carroll  County  line.  It  is  found  exclusively  in  swampy  or  low,  moist, 
rich  soil. 

The  leaves  of  the  Swamp  White  Oak  are  broadly  obovate  or  oblong- 
ovate,  rather  coarsely  round-toothed  or  pinnatifid.  Unlike  the  White 
Oak  the  veins  nearly  always  end  in  a  glandular  sharp  tip.  In  the  case 
of  the  White  Oak  there  is  more  often  a  noticeable  depression  at  the  vein 
ending  in  the  lobe.  The  bark  on  the  younger  branches  peels  back  and 
curls  over  in  a  stiff  and  persistent  papery  layer,  exposing  the  new  lighter 
brown  bark.  This  is  quite  characteristic,  as  is  also  the  long-peduncled 
acorns. 

Quercns  MuhXenhergii  Engelm,    Chestnut  or  Yellow* Oak,  Chinquapin  or 

Chinkapin,  Oak,  Tanbark  Oak,  etc.    (Trans.  St.  Louis  Acad.  3:391. 

1887),   (Q.  Prinus  acuminata  Michx.  1801.     Q.  acuminata  Sarg. 

1895.) 

This  oak  is  reported  from  35  counties  in  all  parts  of  the  State. 

It  is  sometimes  confused  with  Q.  Prinus  L.,  resembling  it  closely,  as 

the  historical  account  above  indicates.     In  White  County  it  was  noted 

only  along  the  Tippecanoe  River.    The  acorns  readily  distinguish  it  from 

other  oaks  indigenous  to  White  County. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


412 


Plate  V. 


Quorcue  alba  Lt. 

Ho«893«  SepteabM  7. 1914. 

ReynoldB,  Ind«   In  Bar- 
donnor*8  woods*  Light i 
aandy  soil. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


413 


Plate  VI. 


Queroua  alba  L. 
Ho. 443 •       Septcober  4. 1915. 
AlonR  road,  on  8pinn  farm,  limi. 
north  of  B^ynolda.  Low,  rich 
fcround.  Trae  40*h.~  14"d. 

lTo.357.       Saptanbar  7. 1914. 
8oaarc7  farn,  1  mi.  north-aaat 
of  Raynolda*  Lowyrich^black  aoil. 
Traa  40»h.-a2«d, 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


414 


Plate  VII. 


QuercuB  alba  L. 

Vo.446.     Sept«Bib«r  4.1915. 

Korth  sldf  of  road,  near 
Weetfall  farm  house,  3  ml. 
north  of  Reynolds.  Low 
elevation,  a  rich-  sandy 
soil. 


Digit! 


ized  by  Google 


415 


Plate  VIll. 


No.283.       S«pteBib«r  4.1SI4. 

Cn  a  low  eandridRe  in  Fleh- 
•r'8  woods,   1  ir.l.    bouth  of 
Heynolds.  Rich  leaf  mold. 


^^ 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


416 


Plate  IX. 


Quercus. alba  L. 

No.  467.   8«pt.l8a915. 

Specimen  ftoai  Vothftr*f 
"Forty*,   1  mi.  north- 
east of  Reynolds.  Lo*i 
somewhat  sandy  soil, 
near  edse  of  sloufdi. 
Tree     35»h.-  6"d. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


417 


Plate  X. 


Quarous  alba  L. 

No. 468 •   8«pt«16«191&« 

From  Moth«r*e  "Forty T 
1  mi*  north-«aet  of 
Raynolda.  Low,  eoma- 
what  eandy  eoil,  naar 
•dga  of  slough • 
Traa  30*h«-  6«d« 


27—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


418 


Plate  XI. 


QuercuB  alba  I 

No.282.       Septenibtr  4.1914. 

Rear  edse  of  a  low  eand- 
rldse^    in  Fisher *e  woods, 
1  mi«    south  of  Peynolds. 
Tree  40 'h*-  10»d. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Plate  XII. 


419 


Queroua  bicolor  Willd. 

Ho. 456.  Sept. ?• 1915. 

Along  read, 5(mi. north- 
east of  Brookston^Ind. 
South  of  Dyer  sohool. 
Low,  rloh,black  soil. 
Tree  30 'h,-  6»d. 
Swaop  White  Oak. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


420 


Plate  XIII. 


Qu«rcu8  bicolor  Willd. 

Ho. 448.      8«pt«6.1915. 

In  Waxd«B  thicket, lai. 
south  of  HeynoldSf  Ind. 
Low,  rich  soil-  ewaapy. 
Tree  d5*h.-  4«d. 
Swamp  White  Oak. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


421 


Plate  XIV. 


QuercuB 

palustrls  Ifuenoh. 
No. 365.       Aug.3.1915f 


In  Ward^B  thic)c6t«   1  mi. 
eouth  of  Reynolds.  Low, 
molBt,  black  soil.Svafflpy 
Tree  40«h.-  7»d. 
Determined  by  Sargent. 


Ho. 473.        Sept. 18. 1915. 


Bordering  north  and  east 
edge  of  an  old  elough^low, 
rich,  blaok  eoil.  Mother's 
Forty,   1  mi.e.of  Reynolde. 
Tree  40»hr  8"d. 
Determined  by  Sargent. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


422 


Plate  XlVi. 


QuerouB  paluetrls 

Mudiich* 
No. 473.     Sept. 18. 1915. 

On  border  of  an  old 
alougji*  Low,     rlchi 
blaok  soil.  Mother >0 
Forty  I   1  mi*  east  of 
Reynold 0. 
Tree  50«h-.10»d. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


423 


Plate  XV. 


^   Quercus  paluetria  Muench. 

No. 351.       Sept.  3.  1915. 
Edge  of  a  wooded  eandridge, 
low,  moist,  rich,  black  soil. 
Bunnell's,  east  of  Reynolds. 
Tree  30«h.-6"d. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


424 


Plate  XVI. 

RANGE  OF 

Quercus  alba  L. 

IN  THE  UNITED  STATES  AND  INDIANA. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


425 


Plate  XVU. 

RANGE  OF 

Quercus  macrocarpa  Michx. 

IN  THE  UNITED  STATES  AND  INDIANA. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


426 


Plate  XVIII. 

RANGE  OF 

Quercus  bicolor  Willd. 

IN  THE  UNITED  STATES  AND  INDIANA. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


427 


Plate  XIX. 

RANGE  OF 

Quercus  imbricaria  Michx. 

IN  THE  UNITED  STATES  AND  INDIANA. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


428 


Plate  XX. 

RANGE  OF 

Quercus  palustris  Du  Roi. 

IN  THE  UNITED  STATES  AND  INDIANA. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


429 


Plate  XXI. 

RANGE  OF 

Quercus  coccinea  Muench. 

IN  THE  UNITED  STATES  AND  INDIANA. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


430 

The  Black  Oaks. 

The  Black  Oaks  form  a  difficult  group  in  the  identification  of  spe- 
cies. Numerically,  the  individuals  in  members  of  this  group  are  many 
and  well  distributed  over  White  County. 

Querctis  imbricaria  Michx.  Shingle  Oak,  Lea,  Jack  or  Laurel  Oak. 
(Hist.  Chen.  Am.  9  pi.  15,  16.  1801.) 
This  oak  has  been  reported  from  25  counties  in  Indiana  and  no 
doubt  occurs  in  many  others.  It  is  the  only  entire-leaved  oak  in  White 
County,  and  in  our  area  it  is  a  medium-sized  tree.  Specimens  were 
found  east  of  Monon,  northwest  of  Reynolds,  up  in  Princeton  township, 
also  southwest  and  east  of  Reynolds,  at  Norway,  east  of  Chalmers  near 
Big  Creek,  and  east  of  Brookston.  In  a  small  grove  just  northwest  of 
Brookston  it  forms  an  almost  pure  stand  of  fair-sized  trees.  It  occurs 
in  rich,  moist  soils  or  near  the  edges  of  low  sand  ridges. 

Quercus  palustris  Muench,  (and  DuRoi?)  Pin  Oak,  Swamp  Oak,  Swamp 
Spanish  Oak.  (Harbk  2:268  pi.  5-14.  1772.) 
Q.  palustris  has  been  reported  from  26  counties.  It  is  said  to  be 
less  frequent  in  the  northern  tier  of  counties.  In  White  County  it  is 
frequent  in  low  places,  associated  with  other  black  oaks,  but  occupying 
the  borders  of  former  swamps  rather  than  higher  soil  of  the  other 
nearby  oaks.  It  is  readily  distinguished  by  its  small  acorns,  small,  thin, 
shallow  cups,  smoother,  bark  than  other  indigenous  oaks,  wide  divergent 
leaf  lobes,  and  tardy  pruning  deflexed  dead  branches.  (See  pp.  421-423, 
428.) 

Quercus  eoccinea  Wang.     Scarlet  Oak.     (Amer.  44  pi.  4  f.  9.  1787.) 

Though  common  throughout  Indiana,  the  published  records  of  this 
oak  include  but  16  counties.  It  is  more  or  less  common  in  White  County. 
The  fairly  large  top-shaped  cup  (2.5  cm.  or  more  broad),  with  its  glab- 
rous, glossy,  closely  appressed  brown  scales  or  bracts  about  half  enclos- 
ing the  oblong-ovoid  nut  with  its  white  kernel,  makes  this  species  readily 
recognizable. 

Querais  valutina  Lam.    Black  Oak,  Quercitron,  Yellow-bark  Oak.     (En- 
cycl.  1:721.  1783.     Q.    tinctoria  Bartram.     Name  only,  1791.     Q. 
eoccinea  var.  tinctoria  A.  Gray,  1867.) 
Velutina  is  a  very  common  species  of  oak  in  White  County.     It  is 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


431 

also  rather  common  in  the  State,  being  reported  from  25  counties.  It  is 
said  to  consist  of  several  races,  differing  in  leaf-lobing,  amount  of 
pubescence,  and  size  of  acorns.  The  large,  somewhat  loose  bracts  of 
the  acorns  with  the  upper  ones  rather  squarrose  or  tips  horizontally 
wrinkled  are  characteristic.  Leaves  which  I  have  taken  from  sucker 
growth  measure  over  a  foot  in  length  and  over  9  inches  in  breadth. 
They  are  very  variable — some  are  deeply  lobed,  others  almost  entire. 
The  leaves  on  vigorous  trees  are  also  often  comparatively  large.  The 
inner  bark  is  a  deep  orange.  Chewed  bits  of  the  twigs  are  said  to  give 
the  saliva  a  yellowish  discoloration  in  contradistinction  to  the  Red  Oak 
and  the  Scarlet  Oak,  if  not  as  well  for  other  black  oaks.  (See  pp.  406, 
408,  429.) 

Quercus  ellipsoidalis  E,  J,  Hill,  Hill's  Oak.  (Pin  Oak,  Yellow  or  Black 
Oak.  Bot.  Gaz.  27:204.  1899.) 
There  is  no  certainty  how  plentiful  this  oak  is  in  White  County. 
Sargent  has  verified  a  specimen  taken  about  a  mile  northeast  of  Rey- 
nolds on  a  low  sand  ridge.  The  tree  was  about  30  feet  high  and  6  inches 
in  diameter.  "In  Indiana  it  has  been  reported  from  Lake  County  only." 
Very  likely  it  will  be  found  to  occur  at  points  between  White  County 
and  Lake  Michigan. 

Quercus  rubra  L.     Red  Oak.     (Sp.  pi.  996.  1753.) 

This  is  the  "largest  and  most  valuable  of  the  biennial  oaks,"  It  is 
distributed  throughout  the  State.  In  White  County  it  is  rather  restricted 
to  the  Tippecanoe  area.  The  leaves  are  usually  much  less  deeply  lobed 
than  those  of  the  other  black  oaks.  The  acorn  when  mature  is  usually 
larger  than  the  acorns  of  any  other  White  County  oak,  except  macro- 
carpa.     (See  p.  406.) 

Quercus    .    .    .    ? 

A  rather  peculiar  specimen  of  oak  was  taken  about  four  and  one- 
fourth  miles  northeast  of  Brookston,  in  an  oak  forest  on  low,  rich,  black 
soil.  Two  such  trees  were  growing  just  beside  each  other.  The  bark 
is  close,  almost  black,  and  shallow  fissured.  These  trees  were  about  45 
feet  high  and  10  inches  in  diameter.  Leaf  specimens  with  twigs,  buds 
and  acorns  were  collected  on  September  7,  1915. 

From  the  specimens  and  data  at  hand,  at  least  three  authorities 
have  disagreed  as  to  the  status  of  this  oak.     All  say  it  is  a  variable 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


432 


Plate  XXII. 


Quercue 
No.  455. 


Sept.?. 1915. 


r 


Near  road,  in  forest  en 
low,  rich,  black  soil, 
4^  ml.  N-.E.  of  Brooks  ton « 
Trees  (2)  45»h..  lO'd. 

See  discusaicn  pp.52 

and  53 • 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


433 

form  and  admit  the  difficulty  of  determination.  It  has  been  said  to  be 
a  variable  form  of  Q.  texana  Sarg,,  not  Buckley  ?,  possibly  synonymous 
with  Q.  Schneckii  Brit.  Q.  borealis  Michx.,  or  Q.  falcata  Michx.,  or  a 
hybrid  of  these  two  have  been  mentioned,  as  has  also  Q.  velutina  Lam. 

My  own  idea  coincides  exactly  with  none  of  these.  Q.  borealis 
Michx.  does  not  occur  in  the  State,  so  far  as  known.  Not  a  single 
reference  to  it  is  made  in  either  Coulter's  Catalogue  or  Beam's  1911 
Report.  Q.  falcata  Michx.  has  been  reported  from  but  three  counties 
in  the  State,  viz.,  Gibson,  Posey  and  Fountain,  which  last  is  somewhat 
exceptional.  Evidently  the  specimen  under  consideration  is  neither  of 
these  or  could  possibly  be  a  hybrid  of  them.  Since  more  or  less  doubt 
shrouds  the  texana-Schneckii  determination  from  more  than  one  stand- 
point, and  since  these  are  the  same  or  different  species  according  to 
different  authors,  I  hesitate  in  applying  either  name,  whether  of  the 
same  or  different  species. 

Q.  velutina  Lam.  does  not  seem  to  be  very  conclusive. 

The  supposed  typical  leaves,  fruit,  etc.,  used  in  various  keys  for 
the  same  species  many  times,  vary  considerably.  So  in  this  case.  The 
leaves  in  this  instance  compare  very  favorably  with  those  .shown  for 
Q.  rubra  L.,  in  Hough's  Handbook  of  the  Trees  of  the  Northern  States 
and  Canada. 

I  have  associated  it  most  closely  with  Q.  rubra  L.,  being  a  rather 
variable  form  of  that  species  or  a  hybrid  of  it  with  velutina  or  coccinea. 
I  add  this  note  from  Hough's  handbook :  "Gray's  Oak,  Q.  borealis  Michx. 
f.,  (also  Q.  ambigua  Michx.  f.),  a  large  tree,  occasionally  found  from 
Ontario  to  Quebec  to  the  mountains  of  North  Carolina,  bearing  leaves 
like  Q.  rubra  L.,  and  fruit  like  Q.  coccinea.  It  is  considered  by  some 
a  distinct  species  and  by  others,  and  probably  more  correctly,  only  an 
aberrant  form  of  Q.  rubra  L." 

3.   The  Hickories. 
With  a  Revised  List  for  the  State, 

The  Hickories  are  very  difficult  of  determination  and  authors  are 
by  no  means  agreed.  If  I  may  venture  upon  a  suggestion,  it  seems  to 
me  that  a  more  careful,  thorough  and  extensive  study  in  the  field  is 

2S— 11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


434 

necessary  before  the  genus  can  be  satisfactorily  divided  into  its  species 
and  varieties. 

In  the  first  place,  the  group  has  been  favored  with  three  genus 
names,  viz.,  Juglans  (L.  1753.) ;  Hicoria  (Raf.— 1808.— Scoria  Raf.  1808, 
Hicorius  Raf.  1817,  Hicoria  Raf.  1836,);  and  Carya  (Nutt.  1818.). 

The  walnuts  and  butternuts  and  our  present  hickories  were  all 
included  under  the  term  Juglans.  The  group  was  split  up  on  the 
strength  of  whether  the  husk  was  dehiscent  or  not,  and  of  course  the 
so-called  hickories  emerged  as  a  separate  genus.  Without  going  further 
into  the  historical  side  of  the  matter,  both  Hicoria  and  Carya  as  a 
genus  name  are  commonly  applied.  I  favor  the  term  Hicoria,  derived 
from  the  aboriginal  or  American  Indian  name  with  its  apparent  priority 
in  print.  Be  this,  however,  as  it  may,  the  names  and  descriptions  given 
to  species  are  infinitely  more  troublesome. 

The  last  7th  Edition,  of  Gray's  Manual,  describes  eight  species  with 
all  of  these,  possibly  excepting  Hicoria  aquatica,  within  the  borders  of 
Indiana.  Britton  and  Brown,  new  (2nd  Ed.)  Flora,  contains  12  species, 
including  but  the  same  species  as  given  in  Gray  for  Indiana.  Doubt 
shrouds  several  of  these  species  as  admitted  in  the  texts. 

Beam's  1911  Report  lists  seven  species  as  occurring  in  Indiana. 
Except  in  name,  this  checks  exactly  foi  those  given  in  Coulter's  Cata- 
logue. Very  brief  notes  on  the  Indiana  species  are  noted  below,  old 
and  new  records  are  given  in  a  list  following  these  notes. 

1.  HicoHa  Pecan  (Marsh)  Brit.   Pecan,  Illinois  Nut,  Soft-shell  Hickory. 

(See  p.  436.) 
This  tree  does  not  occur  in  White  County.  Its  range  as  given  in 
the  1911  Report  is  the  lower  Wabash  and  lower  stretches  of  its  tribu- 
taries. (See  p.  — .)  Without  doubt  this  species  occurs  in  some  as  yet 
.unreported  counties.  In  a  letter  from  Mr.  Deam,  Jan.  31,  1916,  he 
says  that  H.  Pecan  extends  ip  the  Ohio  Valley  at  least  as  far  as  Clark 
County.     This  species  and  the  next  are  not  difficult  of  determination. 

2.  Hicoria  cordiformis  (Wang)  Brit,    Bitter-nut,  Swamp  Hickory,  Pig- 

nut, etc.     (See  p.  436.) 
This  species  is  said  to  occur  throughout  Indiana,  being,  however, 
nowhere  abundant   (Deam  1911   Report).     In  White  County  it  is  per- 
haps the  most  abundant  in  the  central  townships. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


435 

3.  Hicoria  ovata  (Mill)  Brit.    Shagbark,  Shellbark  Hickory,  etc.    (See 

p.-.) 
Common  in  all  parts  of  Indiana.    Common  in  White  County  in  rich, 
moist  soils  or  the  edges  of  sand  ridges.     Sargent  has  split  the  species 
by  designating  two  varieties.     (See  p.  437.) 

(a)  Hicoria  ovata  fraxini folia  Sargent, 

As  noted  in  the  appended  list,  this  variety  occurs  in  three  other 
counties  besides  White.  Without  attempting  any  description  here,  I 
simply  add  that  Sargent  verified  a  specimen  for  me,  taken  one  and  one- 
half  miles  southwest  of  Reynolds. 

(b)  Hicoria  ovata  var.  Nuttallii  Sargent. 

This  variety  occurs  in  Indiana  according  to  two  determinations  by 
Sargent.  Specimens  were  taken  in  Dekalb  County,  south  of  Auburn. 
Leaflets  5.     (Deam's  Nos.  19,  291,  19,  293.) 

4.  Hicoria  laciniosa  (Michx.  f.)  Sarg.  Big  Shagbark,  Kingnut,  etc.    (See 

p.  437.) 
This  species  bears  a  close  resemblance  to  the  preceding  species.    At 
this  time  I  am  unable  to  define  its  distribution  in  White  County  other 
than  to  say  that  it  occurs  in  Honey  Creek  Township.     Rich  soil,  edges 
of  sand  ridges. 

5.  Hicoria  microcarpa  (Nutt)  Brit.    Small-fruited  Hickory,  Little  Pig- 

nut or  Shag-bark. 
The  habitat  and  range  of  this  species  has  not  been  well  studied 
(Deam  1911  Report).  Sargent  now  calls  the  old  microcarpa,  ovalis — 
Carya  ovalis  Sarg. — or  Hicoria  ovalis,  and  has  singled  out  no  less  than 
four  varieties  under  the  species.  Since  hickories  are  more  or  less 
abundant  in  White  County  this  species  with  one  or  more  of  its  varieties 
may  be  found  there.  I  say  this  in  view  of  my  limited  number  of  speci- 
mens and  its  reported  occurrence  in  Tippecanoe  County.  (See  list  p.  437.)  ' 

6.  Hicoria  alba  (L)  Brit.    White  Hickory,  Bull-Nut,  Mocker  Nut,  etc. 

Said  to  be  rather  rare  in  the  northern  part  of  the  State.  Locally 
more  or  less  abundant  in  Honey  Creek  Township  (White  County),  which 
with  its  low  sand  ridges  is  more  suited  to  its  drier  situations. 

7.  Hicoria  glabra  (Mill)  Brit.    Black  Hickory,  Pignut,  etc. 

Sargent  now  styles  this  species  porcina.    I  have  taken  no  specimens 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


436 

of  it  in  White  County,  but  owing  to  its  wide  distribution  it  seems  rea- 
sonable to  expect  it  there. 

(a)  Hicoria  glabra  var,  megacarpa  Sargent, 

Another  of  Sargent's  new  varieties.  "Franklin  County,  on  high 
ground,  west  of  Metamora.     Bark  tight,  leaflets  5." 

Without  further  comment  I  am  permitted  to  add  the  following 
revised  list  for  this  very  puzzling  genus  Hicoria.  The  determinations 
represent  Sargent's  latest  efforts. 

(List  6.) 

Revised  List  of  Hickories  for  Indiana. 

The  determination  of  all  the  new  records  were  made  by  SargenU 
Specimens  of  these  new  records  were  collected  by  C.  C.  Deam,  Prof. 
G.  N.  Hoffer  and  by  myself,  and  are  deposited  in  the  Deam  Herbarium, 
Bluff  ton,  Ind.;  Purdue  Herbarium,  Purdue  University;  Arnold  Arbor- 
etum, Harvard  University,  and  in  my  own  herbarium.  The  chief  change 
noted  in  the  revised  list  is  Sargent's  recognition  of  seven  new  varieties. 

1.  Hicoria  Pecan  (Marsh)  Brit.  Pecan,  Illinois  Nut,  Soft-shell 
Hickory.  Juglans  Pecan  Marsh.  1785;  Carya  olivaeformis  Nutt,  1818; 
Carya  illinoiensis   (Wang)   K.  Koch.  ?;  H.  Pecan  Brit.  1888. 

Old  Records:  Franklin  (Meyncke — from  a  cultivated  tree?) ;  Gibson 
(Schneck) ;  Jefferson  (Young);  Knox  (Thomas);  Posey  (Schneck), 
(Deam)   and   (Wright);  Vigo   (Blatchley). 

No  new  records, 

2.  Hicoria  cordiformis  (Wang)  Brit.  Bitter-nut,  Swamp  Hickory, 
etc.  J.  alba  minima  Marsh.  1785;  J.  cordiformis  Wang.  1787;  C.  amara 
Nutt.  1818;  H.  minima  Brit.  1888;  H.  cordiformis  Brit.  1908. 

Old  Records:  Carroll  (Thompson) ;  Delaware,  Jay,  Randolph  and 
Wayne  (Phinney) ;  Fountain  (Brown) ;  Franklin  (Meyncke)  ;  Gibson 
and  Posey  (Schneck);  Hamilton  and  Marion  (Wilson);  Knox  (Ridg- 
way) ;  Noble  (VanGorder)  ;  Parke  (Hobbs) ;  Steuben  (Bradner) ;  Vigo 
and  Monroe  (Blatchley) ;  Wayne  (Petry  and  Markle) ;  Montgomery 
(Thompson) ;  Posey  (MacDougal  and  Wright) ;  Putnam  (Grimes)  ; 
Tippecanoe  (Coulter) ;  Adams,  Delaware,  Hamilton,  Jennings,  Knox. 
Montgomery,  Owen,  Vermillion,  Warren  and  Wells   (Deam). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


437 

New  Records:  Allen,  Bartholomew,  Fountain,  Franklin,  Johnson, 
Knox,  Switzerland  (Deam  and  Hoffer) ;  White  (Heimlich). 

3.  Hicoria  ovata  (Mill)  Brit.  Shag-bark,  Shell-bark  Hickory,  etc. 
J.  ovata  Mill.  1768;  C.  alba  Nutt.  1818,  not  J.  alba  L.;  H.  ovata  Brit. 
1888. 

Old  Records:  Cass  and  Tippecanoe  (Coulter);  Clark  (Baird  and 
Taylor) ;  Delaware,  Jay,  Randolph  and  Wayne  (Phinney) ;  Franklin 
(Meyncke) ;  Gibson  (Schneck) ;  Hamilton  and  Marion  (Wilson) ;  Knox 
(Ridg:way)  and  (Thomas);  Kosciusko  (Clark)  and  (Scott);  Posey 
(Schneck)  and  (MacDougal  and  Wright);  Vigo  (Blatchley) ;  Wayne 
(Petry  and  Markle) ;  Jefferson  (Young) ;  Monroe  (Blatchley) ;  Mont- 
gomery (Evans) ;  Putnam  (Grimes)  and  (MacDougal) ;  Clark,  Dela- 
ware, Hamilton,  Jennings,  Owen,  Posey,  Steuben  and  Wells  (Deam). 

New  Records:  Allen,  Clark,  Crawford,  Franklin,  Gibson,  Jay,  Knox, 
Owen,  Pike,  Steuben  and  Wells  (Deam  and  Hoffer);  White  (Heimlich). 

3.  Hicoria  ovata   (Mill)   Brit. 

(a)  var.  fraxinifolia  Sarg.  1916.    Ash-leaved  Shag-bark  or  Shell- 
bark  Hickory. 

No  old  records. 

New  Records:  Daviess,  Martin,  Wells  (Deam  and  Hoffer);  White 
(Heimlich). 

(b)  var.  Nuttallii  Sarg.  1916. 
No  old  records. 

New  Records:    Dekalb  (Deam). 

4.  Hicoria  laciniosa  (Michx.  f.)  Sarg.  Big  Shag-bark,  King  Nut, 
etc.  C.  sulcata  Nutt.  not  J.  sulcata  Willd.;  J.  laciniosa  Michx.  f.  1810; 
H.  sulcata  Brit.  1888;  H.  laciniosa  Sarg.  1894. 

Old  Records:  Carroll  (Thompson);  Clark  (Smith);  Dearborn  (Col- 
lins) ;  Delaware,  Jay,  Randolph  and  Wayne  (Phinney) ;  Franklin 
(Meyncke) ;  Gibson  and  Posey  (Schneck) ;  Jefferson  (Coulter)  and 
(Young) ;  Knox  (Ridgway) ;  Kosciusko  (Clark) ;  Miami  (Gorby) ;  Noble 
(VanCrorder) ;  Parke  (Hobbs)  ;  Putnam  (Grimes) ;  Steuben  (Bradner) ; 
Tippecanoe  (Coulter) ;  Vigo  (Blatchley)  ;  Harrison,  Marion,  Posey,  Ver- 
million and  Wells   (Deam). 

New  Records:  Allen,  Bartholomew,  Floyd,  Gibson,  Jay,  Jefferson, 
Martin,  Washington,  Wells   (Deam  and  Hoffer);  White   (Heimlich). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


438 

5.  Hicoria  ovalis.  (C.  ovalis  Sarg.  1916.)  H.  microcarpa  (Nutt) 
Brit.  J.  alba  odorata  Marsh.  1785;  C.  microcarpa  Nutt.  1818;  H.  micro- 
carpa Brit.  1888;  H.  glabra  var.  odorata  Sarg.  1895.  Small-fruited 
Hickory,  Little  Pignut  or  Shag-bark. 

Old  Records:  Clark  (Baird  and  Taylor);  Delaware,  Jay,  Randolph 
and  Wayne  (Phinney) ;  Franklin  (Meyncke)  ;  Gibson  (Ridgway)  and 
(Schneck) ;  Hamilton  and  Marion  (Wilson);  Jefferson  (Coulter)  and 
(Young);  Knox  (Ridgway);  Kosciusko  (Scott);  Miami  (Grorby) ;  Posey 
(Schneck)  and  (MacDougal  and  Wright);  Tippecanoe  (Coulter);  La- 
porte,  Vermillion,  Warren  and  Wells   (Deam). 

New  Records:  Allen,  Bartholomew,  Daviess,  Floyd,  Franklin,  Gib- 
son, Jay,  Lagrange,  Lawrence,  Steuben,  Sullivan,  Washingfton,  Wells 
(Deam  and  Hoffer). 

5.  Hicoria  ovalis.    (Carya  ovalis  Sarg.) 

(a)  var.  odorata  Sarg.  1916. 
No  old  records. 

New  Records:  Allen,  Jefferson,  Lagrange,  Steuben  and  Wells  (Deam 
and  Hoffer). 

(b)  var.  obovalis  Sarg.  1916. 
No  old  records. 

New  Records:  Grant,  Jackson,  Lagrange,  Steuben,  Washington  and 
Wells   (Deam  and  Hoffer). 

(c)  var.  obcordata  Sarg.  1916. 
No  old  records. 

New  Records:  Grant,  Lagrange,  Porter  and  Wells  (Deam  and 
Hoffer). 

H.  ovalis.     (C.  ovalis  Sarg.) 

(d)  var ?? 

No  old  records. 

New  Records:  "These  specimens  seem  to  be  a  new  variety,"  Sargent 
1916.  No  name  has  been  given.  Specimens  are  from  Knox  and  Gibson 
(Deam  and  Hoffer). 

6.  Hicoria  alba  (L)  Brit.  White-heart  Hickory,  Mocker-nut,  Bull- 
nut,  etc.  J.  alba  L.  1753;  J.  tomentosa  Lam.  1797;  C.  tomentosa  Nutt. 
1818;  H.  alba  Brit.  1888. 

Old  Records:  Cass  (Benedict  and  Elrod) ;  Clark  (Baird  and  Tay- 
lor)   and    (Smith);   Dearborn    (Collins);   Fountain    (Meyncke);   Gibson 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


439 

and  Posey  (Schneck)  and  (Deam) ;  Hamilton  and  Marion  (Wilson); 
Jefferson  (Coulter)  and  (Young) ;  Knox  (Ridgway) ;  Kosciusko  (Clark) 
and  (Scott) ;  Miami  (Gorby) ;  Vigo  (Blatchley) ;  Wabash  (Benedict 
and  Elrod) ;  Tippecanoe  (Coulter). 

New  Records:  Daviess,  Franklin,  Harrison,  Jackson,  Jay,  Jefferson, 
Knox,  Lawrence,  Sullivan,  Washington  (Deam  and  Hoffer)  ;  White 
(Heimlich). 

7.  Hicoria  porcina.  (C.  porcina  Sarg.  1916.)  Pignut  Hickory,  Black 
Hickory.  Hicoria  glabra  (Mill)  Brit.  J,  glabra  Mill.  1768;  C.  porcina 
Nutt.  1818;  H.  glabra  Brit.  1888;  H.  glabra  hirsuta  Ashe.  1896. 

Old  Records:  Cass  and  Wabash  (Benedict  and  Elrod);  Carroll 
(Thompson) ;  Clark  (Baird  and  Taylor)  and  (Smith) ;  Dearborn  (Col- 
lins) ;  Delaware,  Jay,  Randolph  and  Wayne  (Phinney) ;  Franklin  (Hay- 
mond)  and  (Meyncke) ;  Gibson  and  Posey  (Schneck) ;  Hamilton  and 
Marion  (Wilson) ;  Jay  (McCaslin) ;  Jefferson  (Coulter)  and  (Young) ; 
Knox  (Ridgway)  and  (Thomas) ;  Noble  (VanGorder) ;  Parke  (Hobbs) ; 
Putnam  (Grimes)  and  (MacDougal) ;  Steuben  (Bradner) ;  Tippecanoe 
(Coulter) ;  Vigo  (Blatchley) ;  Delaware,  Owen,  Posey  and  Warren 
(Deam). 

New  Records:  Crawford,  Floyd,  Franklin,  Harrison,  Lawrence, 
Martin,  Sullivan   (Deam  and  Hoffer). 

7.    Hicoria  .porcina.    (Carya  porcina  Sarg.) 
(a)  var.  megacarpa  Sarg.  1916. 

No  old  records. 

New  Records:    Franklin   (Deam). 

4.    Trees  Restricted  to  the  Tippecanoe  River  Banks. 

As  indicated  by  the  list  and  map  on  page  440,  about  half  (23  out 
of  62)  the  species  found  in  White  County  are  totally  or  in  some  cases 
nearly  exclusively  confined  to  the  Tippecanoe  River  banks.  Some  few 
of  these  are  found  at  a  distance  from  the  river  or  the  lower  stretches 
of  creeks.     These  include  the  Bur  Oak,  the  Prickly  Ash  and  others. 

Though  not  restricted  to  the  above  area,  the  Red  Cedar,  the  Black 
Walnut,  Sassafras,  and  a  few  others,  receive  their  best  development  in 
the  vicinity  of  the  Tippecanoe.  The  largest  sassafras  trees  were  noted 
near  Buffalo,  east  bank  of  the  river;   the  most  abundant  and  largest 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


440 


Plate  XXIII. 
WHITE  COUNTY. 


.••Tree*  Restricted   to  the  TippeCvXnoe  River  Banks,.. 


®  Querous  macroceirpa  Michx* 

®  Ifuhlenbergii  EnRelro. 

®        rubra  L. 

P   PopulUB  beteropbylla  L» 

z  Zantboxylum  amerioanum  Mill. 

^  Acer  nigrum  Uiobx. 

J  Juglane  cinerea  L* 

f   Platanus  occidentalie  L. 

•  LirlOvlendron  Tulipifera  L, 

j«:  Celtls  occidentalie  L, 

o    Ostrya  virj^iniana  (Mill)Willd 

A  Cercia  canadensie  L* 

a   Tilia  americana  L. 

•  Gldditsia  triacantbos  L. 


#  Oymnocladua  diooia(L)Koch. 
/?Robinia  Pseudo-acaala  L. 
a  Aesculua  glabra  Willd, 
F Fagua  grand if olia  Ebrh, 
tPtelea  trifollata  L. 
TStapbyllea  trifoliata  L, 
(TCornuB  florida  L. 
e       alternifolia  L.f. 
t  Asimina  triloba  (L)Dunal. 
tCarpinua  carollniana  L, 
•HHaraamella  virgin iana  L. 
wBatula  lutea  Michx. 
^Crataegua  albicans  Aahe  t 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


441 

Cedars  were  seen  south  of  Monticello,  especially  along  the  lower  course 
of  Big  Creek.     (See  map,  p.  451.) 

Quercus  macrocarpa  Michx,     See  p.  409. 

Quercus  Muhlenbergii  Engelm,     See  p.  411. 

Quercus  rubra  L.    See  p.  431. 

Populus  heterophylla  L.  Swamp  or  Downy  Poplar,  River-  or  Swamp 
Cotton- wood.,  Balm-of-Gilead.  In  Indiana  this  tree  is  "rare  and  local, 
except  in  the  lower  Wabash  bottoms."  The  published  records  of  the 
distribution  are  as  follows:  Delaware,  Jay,  Randolph  and  Wayne  (Phin- 
ney) ;  Franklin  (Meyncke) ;  Gibson  and  Posey  (Schneck)  ;  Hamilton 
(Doane) ;  Jay  (McCaslin) ;  Knox  (Ridgway) ;  Miami  (Gorby)  ;  Vigo 
(Blatchley) ;  Blackford,  Laporte,  Posey,  Wells   (Deam). 

I  found  specimens  near  the  Carroll  County  line,  five  and  three- 
fourths  miles  northeast  of  Brookston,  in  low,  rich  soil;  trees  25  or  more 
feet  high  and  up  to  6  inches  in  diameter.  (See  p.  454  for  other  species 
of  Populus.) 

Acer  nigrum  Michx,  Black  Sugar  Maple,  Black  or  Hard  Maple. 
I  cannot  speak  with  certainty  of  the  exact  distribution  of  maples  in  the 
county.  Species  of  this  genus  are  very  frequently  used  as  shade  trees 
and  all  have  some  escapes.  Members  of  this  genus  were  found  in 
abundance  near  Buffalo  and  south  along  the  Tippecanoe.  Some  trees 
are  also  to  be  found  in  oak  forests  of  Honey  Creek  Township.  A.  nigrum 
was  found  about  three  miles  south  of  Monticello.  The  group  consisted 
of  a  number  of  large  trees  (70  feet  high  by  17  inches  diameter)  on  a 
sandy,  gravelly  slope.     (See  other  Maples  p.  458.) 

Juglans  cinerea  L.  Butternut,  White  or  Lemon  Walnut,  Oilnut. 
Reported  from  many  counties,  but  said  to  occur  in  very  sparing  numbers 
in  some.  It  is  rather  rare  in  White  County  and  adheres  to  the  banks 
of  the  Tippecanoe.  Specimens  were  taken  from  fair-sized  trees  on  high, 
rich,  gravelly  soil,  east  of  Lowe's  bridge,  about  four  miles  southwest 
of  Buffalo.     (See  p.  454  for  nigra.) 

Platanus  Occident  alls  L.  Sycamore,  Button-wood,  Button -ball.  Plane 
Tree.  This  is  Indiana's  distinctive  tree.  Found  in  all  parts  of  the 
State,  more  or  less  frequent  along  streams  or  the  borders  of  lakes.  It 
has  the  distinction  of  being  the  largest  deciduous  tree  in  North  America. 
(Tree  at  Worthington,  Indiana,  over  44  feet  in  circumference  and  150 
feet  high.) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


442 

I  have  seen  some  comparatively  large  individuals  along  the  Wabash 
up  to  the  mouth  of  the  Tippecanoe.  It  is  found  along  the  entire  extent 
of  the  latter  river  through  White  County.  It  was  also  found  in  Honey 
Creek  Township  (Ward's  thicket),  near  Spring  Creek  (J.  P.  Erickson 
farm)  about  three  and  one-half  miles  northeast  of  Brookston,  and  along 
Big  Creek,  four  miles  east  of  Chalmers. 

Liriodendron  tulipifera  L.  Tulip-tree,  Yellow  Poplar,  Canoe-wood, 
Lime-tree,  White-wood.  The  published  lists  for  Indiana  cover  41 
counties.  Rather  rare  in  some  localities.  One  of  Indiana's  largest  and 
most  useful  trees.  Not  plentiful,  but  found  along  the  entire  length  of 
the  Tippecanoe  through  White  County.  "It  is  practically  free  from 
insect  and  fungous  diseases"  and  is  an  excellent  tree  for  re-enforcing 
the  woodlot — a  good  shade  tree. 

The  following  trees  are  more  or  less  common  along  the  Tippecanoe 
and  usually  are  not  found  far  from  the  watercourse.  Some  of  them 
have  made  their  way  along  the  creeks  for  several  miles,  notably  Spring 
Creek,  east  of  Brookston,  Big  Creek,  Big  Monon,  and  Pike  Creek. 

Celtis  occidentalis  L.     Hackberry,  etc. 

Ostrya  virginiana  (Mill)  Willd.     Hop-hornbeam. 

Carpinus  caroliniana  Walt.  Am.  Hornbeam,  etc. 

Cercis  canadensis  L.     Red-bud,  Judas-tree. 

Tilia  americana  L.     Linden,  Basswood. 

Gymnocladus  diocia  (L)  K.  Koch.     Coffeenut-tree. 

Aesculus  glabra  Willd.     Ohio  Buckeye. 

Fagus  grandifolia  Ehrh.     Beech. 

Comus  florida  L.  Flowering  Dogwood. 

alternifolia  L.  f.     Green  Osier,  etc. 

Asimina  triloba   (L)   Dunal.     Pawpaw. 

Ptelea  trifoliata  L.     Hop-tree,  Shrubby  Trefoil. 

Hamamelis  virginiana  L.     Witch-hazel. 

Staphylea  trifoliata  L.     American  Bladder-nut. 

The  last  three  of  the  above  list  are  not  included  in  Deam's  1911 
Report.  These  are  large  shrubs  or  small  trees.  There  are  Ptelea  at 
Norway,  15  feet  high  and  3  inches  in  diameter.  The  foliage  when 
bruised  has  an  unpleasant  odor.  The  fruit  is  bitter  and  has  been  used 
as  a  substitute  for  hoi^n.     According  to  Coulter  it  is  found  in  Jefferson, 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


443 

Tippecanoe,  Monroe,  Vigo,  Putnam,  Gibson,  Posey,  Jay,  Delaware,  Ran- 
dolph, Wayne,  Clark,  Franklin,  Hamilton,  Cass  and  Fayette  Counties. 

The  Witch-hazel  is  interesting  because  of  its  flowering  so  late  in 
the  season  (October  to  December).  The  bony  seeds  ripen  in  early  spring 
and  may  be  "shot"  several  yards  from  their  capsules.  Some  shrubby 
specimens  near  Norway  were  eight  feet  or  more  high.  Distribution 
given  in  Coulter's  Catalogue:  Kosciusko,  Laporte,  Jefferson,  Tippecanoe, 
Clark,  Noble,  Delaware,  Jay,  Randolph,  Wayne,  Franklin,  Monroe,  Vigo, 
Cedar  Lake,  Hamilton,  Putnam  and  Steuben. 

The  Bladder-nut,  which  may  be  a  small  tree  in  the  south,  is  more 
nearly  a  large  shrub  in  our  area.  Specimens  seen  at  Norway  were 
rather  tall  (perhaps  15  feet  high).  Distribution  given  in  Coulter's 
Catalogue:  Jefferson,  Tippecanoe,  Monroe,  Vigo,  Putnam,  Gibson,  Posey, 
Kosciusko,  Hendricks,  Decatur,  Knox,  St.  Joseph,  Hamilton,  Marion, 
Steuben  and  Fayette. 

Gleditsia  triacanthos  L.  Honey  Locust.  This  is  a  rather  charac- 
teristic and  imposing  tree  along  the  Tippecanoe.  It  is  sometimes  found 
along  the  lower  portions  of  creeks. 

Robinia  pseudo-acasia  L.  Common  Black  Locust.  This  locust  was 
noted  several  miles  south  of  Monticello  and  also  near  Lowe's  bridge. 
It  is  cultivated  in  all  parts  of  the  county  and  escapes  are  occasionally 
found. 

Betula  lutea  Michx.  Yellow  Birch.  This  species  has  been  confused 
with  Betula  lenta,  which,  according  to  Deam,  does  not  occur  in  our 
area.  In  Indiana  it  is  rare  and  local.  It  has  not  been  reported  south 
of  Miami  County  except  in  Crawford  County,  associated  with  the  laurel 
(Kalmia  latifolia),  which  is  the  only  station  of  the  latter  in  the  State, 
except  possibly  another  record  for  Floyd  County. 

Specimens  were  taken  from  two  trees  about  two  miles  south  of 
Buffalo  near  the  water's  edge  of  the  river.  These  were  thought  to  be 
different  species  at  first,  but  they  are  likely  both  lutea.  It  is  certain 
that  one  is  lutea  and  the  other  will  likely  be  found  to  be  so  when  fresh 
material  is  available.  A  mere  guess  at  the  height  of  these  trees  would 
place  them  about  40  feet  high.  They  were  associated  with  maples,  ashes, 
sycamores  and  honey-locusts. 

Zanthoxylum  americanum  Mill.     Prickly  Ash,  Toothache  Tree,  An- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


444 


Plate  XXIV. 
RANGE  OF 
Betula  lutea  Michx. 
IN  THE  UNITED  STATES  AND  INDI 


^^iSR 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


445 

gelica  Tree,  etc.  This  species  is  conspicuous  along  some  parts  of  the 
Tippecanoe  (Norway  and  Buffalo).  Several  trees  were  found  in  Ward's 
thicket,  about  a  mile  south  of  Reynolds,  and  also  along  Big  Creek,  four 
miles  east  of  Chalmers.  It  is  variously  called  a  small  tree  or  a  large 
shrub  and  is  not  included  in  the  1911  Report.  Some  of  the  specimens 
found  were  about  10  feet  high  and  3  inches  in  diameter. 

In  Coulter's  Catalogue  it  is  reported  from  Posey,  Vigo,  Cass,  Kos- 
ciusko, Steuben,  Jefferson,  Randolph,  Franklin,  Shelby  and  a  dozen  other 
counties. 

The  Thcms  constitute  one  of  the  most  puzzling  genera  in  the  plant 
kingdom.  More  field  work  is  necessary  before  statements  of  ranges  and 
abundance  of  each  species  in  White  County  is  possible.  It  is  likely  that 
more  species  occur  in  the  county  than  is  given  here.     (See  p.  457.) 

Crataegus  pruinosa  (Wendl)  K,  Koch,  Waxy- fruited  Thorn.  (C. 
populifolia  Ell.  1821;  not  Walt.;  Mespilus  pruinosa  Wendl.  1823;  C. 
pruinosa  K.  Koch.  1853;  C.  Porteri  Brit.  1900.  Specimens  of  this  thorn 
were  obtained  east  of  Norway  across  the  river  in  the  vicinity  of  the 
mouth  of  Pike  Creek.  A  number  of  thorn  trees  are  present  in  this 
locality,  this  species  being  perhaps  locally  abundant.  On  gravelly  soil, 
low  river  bank.  Trees  12  feet  high,  4  inches  in  diameter.  Determined 
by  Sargent. 

Deam  says  this  thorn  is  well  distributed  in  Indiana.  Specimens 
have  been  seen  from  the  following  counties:  Decatur,  Delaware,  Gibson, 
Hamilton,  Madison,  Steuben,  Warren,  Wells  (Deam) ;  Putnam  (Grimes). 

Crataegtis  albicans  Ashe?  Tatnall's  Thorn.  C.  albicans  Ashe  1901; 
C.  Tatnalliana  Sarg.  Feb.  1903;  C.  polita  Sarg.  Apr.  1903.  I  quote  the 
following  from  a  letter  from  W.  W.  Eggleston:  "Your  specimen  of 
Crataegus  sent  me  ....  is  received.  It  belongs  in  the  Coccineae 
and  seems  to  be  C.  albicans  Ashe?  More  complete  material  showing  the 
leaves  on  the  vegetative  shoots  is  desirable  to  be  sure  of  the  identifica- 
tion, for  with  this  material  I  could  not  be  quite  sure  that  it  is  not 
C.  coccinea  L."  Britton  and  Brown,  2nd  Ed.,  makes  the  following  dis-, 
tinction  between  the  two  species: 

Leaves  on  vegetative  shoots  cuneate,  C.  coccinea. 
Leaves  on  vegetative  shoots  cordate,  C.  albicans. 

It  will  be  noted  that  C.  albicans  has  not  been  reported  as  occurring 
in  the  State.     Its  general  range  is  given  as  "Western  New  England  to 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


446 


Plate  XXV. 


Crataegus  albicans  i( she? 

No* 434.     September  1.1S15. 

Along  east  bank  of  Tippe- 
canoe river  ^  mi.  south 
of  Buffalo.  High, gravelly 
soil.   Tree  20'h.-5^d. 
retermined  by  W.W.Eggleston. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


447 

southern  Michigan,  south  to  Delaware  and  in  the  mountains  to  north- 
eastern Tennessee." 

C.  coccinea  has  the  following  record  for  the  State:  Floyd  (Deam) ; 
Noble  (VanGorder) ;  Steuben  (Deam). 

The  specimen  taken  was  from  a  lone  tree,  one-fourth  mile  south  of 
Buffalo  on  a  high,  gravelly  river-bank.  Tree  20  feet  high,  5  inches  in 
diameter.  No.  343.  September  1,  1915.  Additional  material  is  not  to 
be  had  before  the  completion  of  this  thesis  and  so  the  exact  determina- 
tion must  be  deferred  till  some  later  date.  (See  p.  457  for  other  Haws, 
also  p.  449.) 

Thus  the  Tippecanoe  River  has  some  28  species  clinging  closely  to 
its  banks,  besides  claiming  specimens  of  all  other  species  in  White 
County,  except  possibly  one  or  two  species  of  willows,  Quercus  ellip- 
soidalis  and  Malus  ioensis. 

5.   Report  of  a  New  Species  and  a  New  Variety  for  the  State. 

Salix  missouriensis  Bebb,  Missouri  or  Diamond  Willow,  Heart- 
leaved  Willow.     1895. 

S.  cordata  Muhl.  1803;  S.  angustata  Pursh.  1814;  S.  cordata  angus- 
tata  (Pursh)  Anders.  1867;  S.  acutidens  Rydb.  1901. 

The  above  are  the  synonyms  given  in  Britton  and  Brown,  2nd  Ed., 
with  S.  cordata  Muhl.  preferred. 

Sargent,  who  determined  my  specimen,  called  it  S.  missouriensis. 

In  Gray's  Manual,  7th  Ed.,  cordata  and  missouriensis  are  treated 
as  separate  species,  the  last,  however,  with  this  note:  "A  poorly  under- 
stood tree,  said  to  flower  earlier  than  S.  cordata;  perhaps  a  variety 
(var.  vestita  Anders.)  of  that  species." 

In  Hough's  Handbook  of  the  Trees  of  the  Northern  States  and 
Canada,  the  Missouri  Willow  is  given  as  Salix  missouriensis  MuehL, 
with  the  synonym  of  S.  cordata  var.  vestita  Sarg. 

In  the  face  of  all  the  above,  hybridization  is  mentioned  by  each  of 
the  contending  authors.     (See  ranges  given  on  map,  p.  450.) 

This  willow  has  hitherto  been  unreported  for  the  State  except  that 
S.  cordata  Muhl.  and  S.  cordata  angustata  (Pursh)  Anders,  are  reported 
in  Coulter's  Catalogue,  the  former  with  the  record:  "In  a  few  counties 
in  rather  sparing  numbers,  growing  in  low,  moist  soils.  More  abundant 
southward.     Flowers  in  April  and  May.     Putnam   (MacDougal)  ;  Vigo 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


448 


Plate  XXVI. 


Salix  mieeouriensie  Eebb. 

No. 374.   Auguet  4.  1915. 

Along  road  ditchy   near 
Pennsylvania  railroad. 
It  mi.  east  of  Reynolds. 
Lowy  wet,  rich  soil. 
Bushes  about  10  ft.  high. 
Determined  by  Sargent. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


449 

(Blatchley);  Tippecanoe  (Coulter)."  The  last  mentioned  has  this 
record:  "In  wet  soil  in  the  northern  part  of  the  State.  Flowers  from 
April  to  May.     Steuben   (Bradner)." 

I  have  seen  no  specimens  of  the  above  for  comparison.  The  report 
of  missouriensis  may  or  may  not  be  new  to  the  State.  Owing  to  the 
hybridizing  character  of  the  willows  and  the  difficulty  of  separation, 
much  additional  work  is  necessary  before  the  status  of  this  genus  is 
settled  satisfactorily. 

The  specimens  I  found  in  White  County  consisted  of  a  small  group 
of  shrubby  growth  not  more  than  10  feet  high,  one  and  three-fourths 
miles  east  of  Reynolds,  near  the  Pennsylvania  Railroad,  growing  along 
a  road  ditch  in  low,  wet,  rich,  black  soil.  Specimens  with  fruiting  parts 
were  taken  on  August  4,  1915.  Stems  with  catkins  were  also  collected 
on  April  16,  1916. 

Salix  longi folia  var.  argophylla  Sarg.  1916.  By  the  courtesy  of 
Mr.  Deam,  I  am  allowed  to  report  this  new  variety  of  willow  for  the 
State.  A  specimen  was  taken  by  Mr.  Deam  "on  the  bank  of  the  big 
dredge  ditch  (Little  Monon  Creek),  meeting  the  railway  from  the  south, 
about  a  mile  east  of  Seafield,  White  County.     Determined  by  Sargent." 

I  took  s^^pecimens  of  S.  longifolia  Muhl.,  determined  by  Sargent  as 
S.  fli'viatilis,  about  three  and  one-half  miles  north  of  the  above  place, 
along  the  same  creek,  and  also  about  three  miles  northeast  of  this  place 
on  the  banks  of  the  Hoagland  ditch. 

The  latest  floras  do  not  include  the  above  variety.  (See  S.  interior 
Rowlee,  p.  452.)  (S.  sessifolia  Nutt,  S.  argophylla  Nutt.,  S.  fluviatilis 
argophylla  Sarg.) 

Crataegus  albicans  Ashe?  Tatnall's  Thorn.  If  the  above  determi- 
nation can  be  verified,  it  will  increase  the  already  long  list  of  thorns  for 
the  State.  As  has  been  indicated  on  p.  445,  Eggleston  favors  this  deter- 
mination with  the  material  at  hand.  If  Salix  missouriensis  does  not 
prove  to  be  new  to  the  State  this  species  may  be.     (See  p.  446.) 


29—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


450 


Plate  XXVII. 

RANGE  OF 

Salix  Missouriensis  Bebb. 

IN  THE  UNITED  STATES  AND  INDIANA. 


HOVCH. 


SKITTOH  and  RHjO\WAi^2r^  tAu 

»«*^3aliK  cordaia,  MuTil. 

S.  missotcYiensis  BeO* 


Sa.lix  cordditL  Muhl. 


Digitized  by  VjOOQ  Ic 


451 


Plate  XXVIII. 
WHITE  COUNTY. 


Salix 
>:interior  Rovlee. 
:^nigra  Marsh. 
Xanygdaloidea  Anders, 
xdisoolor  Uuhl. 
^humilis  Harsh. 
>^longifolia  var. 

argophylla  Sarg. 

Toxylon  pomiferum  Raf . 


Gen^iral    Dietrltution   of   Trees   over    the   County    — 
OEittirg    the  OAKS  ar.d   HICKORIES,    and   also   those   Specieo 
r.ore   Typiacally   Restricted    to    the   Tiprecance. 

ix  Amelanehic:  canaden8is(L)Med.^CoryIus  amerioana  Walt. 

pPopulua  alba  L.  ®Horus  rubra  L. 

P  grandidentata  Mlchx.  V!/uibu8  americana  L. 

F  tromuloides  Michx.       ^  fulva  Miohx. 

^  deltoldes  Marsh.  Aprunus  americana  Marsh. 

^Sassafras  sassafras  (L)Kar8t.*  serotina  Ehrh. 

2)Malus  malus  (L)  Brltton.  ^Cophalanthus  ocoldentalis  L. 

2  ioenBis(Wood)Britton.   CTCcrnus  femina  Mill. 

^  Nyssa  sylvatica  Marsh.  (^  stolonlfsra  Miohx. 

^  Crataegus  Crua-galli  L.  ^Zanthoxylum  amerioanum  Marsh. 

*  Calpodendron(Ehrh)Medlo.  ^ Sambuous  canadensis  L. 

•^  Ilex  verticillata(L)A.Gray.    ^Rhus  copallina  L. 

4Aoer  saccharinum  L.  ^  hirta  8udw. 

▲  saccharum  Marsh*  t  glabra  L. 

A  negundo  L.  •Juniperun  virt:iri  icirn   L. 

rfraxinus  acericana  L.  /Viburnan  prunifolium  L. 

T  pennsylvanicaMarsh*/  Lentago  L. 

81 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


452 


6.    Species  Generally  Distributed  Over  the  County. 


Salix  interior  Rowlee,  Sandbar  Willow.  The  willow  referred  to  as 
the  Sandbar  willow  of  various  authors  suffers  various  scientific  names 
without  much  apparent  agreement.  The  record  in  Britton  and  Brown 
is  as  follows:  S.  longifolia  Muhl.  1803;  not  Lam.  1778;  S.  interior  Row- 
lee 1900;  S.  linearifolia  Rydb.  1901.  Has  been  confused  with  S.  fluvia- 
tilis  Nutt.  (S.  Wheeleri  (Rowlee)  Rydb from  N.  B.  to  lU.,  dif- 
fers in  having  the  leaves  permanently  silky.).  Gray's  7th  Ed.  says  that 
S.  longifolia  Muhl.  is  the  Sandbar  willow.  Synonym,  S.  interior  Rowlee; 
S.  fluviatilis  auth.,  not  Nutt.  Hough  gives  S.  fluviatilis  Nutt.  as  the 
Sandbar  willow  with  the  synonym  of  S.  longifolia  Muhl. 

Thus  the  trials  and  patience  of  the  amateur,  and  I  should  also 
include  the  expert,  are  once  more  exemplified,  if  not  sorely  pressed. 
One  wonders  in  so  many  cases  if  no  agreement  ever  will  result.  At  any 
rate,  the  species  which  answers  the  description  of  S.  interior  Rowlee  is 
abundant  along  the  streams  of  White  County. 

This  species  is  not  given  in  the  1911  Report.  In  Coulter's  Catalogrue 
the  record  is  as  follows:  Salix  fluviatilis  Nutt.,  Syn.  S.  longifolia  Muhl. 
Tippecanoe  (Cunningham);  Putnam  (MacDougal)  ;  Vigo  (Blatchley); 
Jefferson   (J.  M.  Coulter);  Clark   (Baird  and  Taylor). 

Due  perhaps  chiefly  to  their  tendency  to  hybridize,  the  willows  are 
admittedly  difficult  of  determination.  The  remaining  forms  considered 
as  occurring  in  White  County  seem  to  be  less  confusing. 

Salij-  nigra  Marsh.  Black  Willow.  This  willow  is  more  or  less 
abundant  in  White  County.  Specimens  were  taken  from  Honey  Creek 
Township.  Its  range  is  more  than  the  total  eastern  half  of  the  United 
States. 

Salix  amygdaloides  Anders,  Peach-leaved  Willow.  Although  hav- 
ing a  large  range  in  North  America,  from  Quebec  through  Saskatchewan 
to  British  Columbia,  and  through  northern  Kentucky  to  the  Rio  Grande 
in  New  Mexico,  along  the  mountains  to  Oregon  and  Washington,  this 
species  is  not  mentioned  in  Coulter's  Catalogue,  and  in  the  1911  Report 
the  published  record  is  but  from  one  county,  Kosciusko  (Scott),  with 
the  then  new  record  of  a  specimen  each  taken  in  Lake  County  by  Urn- 
bach  and  Deam.  Distribution  in  White  County  uncertain,  specimen 
taken  from  Honey  Creek  Township. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Plate  XXIX. 

RANGE  OF 

Salix  amygdaloides  Anders. 

IN  THE  UNITED  STATES  AND  INDIANA. 


453 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


454 

Salix  discolor  MuhL  Glaucous  Willow.  This  form  has  been  omitted 
from  the  1911  Report.  In  Coulter's  Catalogue  it  is  reported  from  Tippe- 
canoe (Cunnington) ;  Jefferson  (Barnes)  ;  Vigo  (Blatchley) ;  Kosciusko 
(Coulter);  Clark  (Baird  and  Taylor);  Gibson  and  Posey  (Schneck); 
Knox  (Spillman) ;  Hamilton  (Wilson);  Steuben  (Bradner).  It  is  more 
or  less  abundant  in  White  County.  Specimens  were  taken  in  Monon 
and  Honey  Creek  Townships. 

Salix  humilis  Marsh,  Prairie  Willow.  This  willow  is  not  included 
in  the  1911  Report,  nor  is  it  mentioned  in  Hough's  Handbook  of  the 
Trees  of  the  Northern  States  and  Canada.  The  range  for  Indiana  as 
given  in  Coulter's  Catalogue  is  as  follows:  Laporte  (Barnes);  Putnam 
(MacDougal) ;  Vigo  (Blatchley) ;  Tippecanoe  (Coulter) ;  Hamilton  (Wil- 
son);  Steuben   (Bradner). 

In  this,  as  in  many  other  instances,  the  attention  is  drawn  to  the 
number  of  well-worked  counties.  It  occurs  in  Honey  Creek  Township 
and  is  very  likely  in  other  townships. 

Populus  tremuloides  Mich^.  American  Aspen,  Quaking  Asp  or 
Aspen,  1803.  The  Quaking  Aspen  is  a  very  familiar  tree  in  White 
County.  Very  abundant  in  low,  wet  places.  Sometimes  found  growing 
with  the  Cottonwood. 

Popuhis  deltoides  Marsh.  Cottonwood,  Necklace  Poplar.  (P.  caro- 
linensis  Moench.  1785;  P.  monilifera  Ait.  1789;  P.  angulata  Ait.  1789.) 
This  is  a  much  larger  tree  than  the  Quaking  Aspen.  Common  through- 
out the  county.     Said  to  consist  of  several  races. 

Populus  grandidentata  Michx,  Large-toothed  Aspen.  Scattered 
throughout  the  county  in  low,  rich  soils,  or  near  the  edges  of  sand  ridges. 

Populus  alba  L.  White  or  Silver-leaf  Poplar.  Introduced  from 
Europe.  Escapes  in  all  parts  of  the  State,  although  the  published  rec- 
ords are  meagre.  Escapes  in  several  places  in  White  County.  Speci- 
mens were  taken  from  trees  along  Big  Creek  about  four  and  one-fourth 
miles  east  of  Chalmers. 

For  Populus  heterophylla  see  p.  441.  The  above  species  of  this  genus 
are  arranged  in  the  order  of  their  frequency  in  White  County. 

Juglans  nigra  L.  Black  Walnut.  Common  throughout  the  State. 
Found  along  the  Tippecanoe  River  and  also  some  distance  from  its  banks 
in  locally  abundant  numbers.  Cultivated  throughout  the  county.  (Sec 
p.  464.)      (J.  cinerea,  see  p.  441.) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


455 

Corylus  a^nericana  Walt.  Hazelnut,  Filbert.  The  hazel  sometimes 
becomes  a  rather  large  shrub.  It  is  very  abundant  in  White  County, 
as  well  as  throughout  the  State. 

Ulmus  americana  L.  American  or  White  Elm.  Reported  from  29 
counties  in  the  State.  Of  general  distribution  in  White  County  along 
^with — 

Ulmus  fulva  Michx.  Slippery,  Red,  or  Moose  Elm.  Said  to  be  in 
more  sparing  numbers  in  the  State  than  the  preceding,  but  nevertheless 
reported  from  an  extra  county.  Not  abundant,  merely  local  in  White 
County. 

Moras  rubra  L,  Red  Mulberry.  Isolated  trees  or  very  small  groups 
in  various  parts  of  the  county.  Along  the  lower  stretches  of  Spring 
Creek  it  is  associated  with  elms,  hop-hornbeams,  etc. 

Toxylon  pomiferum  Raf,  Hedge,  Osage  Orange.  The  natural  range 
of  this  species  covers  only  the  adjacent  borders  of  Texas,  Oklahoma, 
Indian  Territory,  Arkansas  and  Louisiana,  or  from  Missouri  and  Kansas 
south  to  Texas.  It  has  been  cultivated  over  a  considerable  part  of  the 
country  and  escapes  are  more  or  less  frequent.  Escapes  in  Indiana  are 
given  for  Decatur  (Ballard) ;  Franklin  (Meyncke) ;  Hamilton  (Wilson) ; 
Jefferson  (J.  M.  Coulter) ;  Tippecanoe  (Thompson) ;  Vigo  (Blatchley) ; 
Montgomery  (Evans) ;  Putnam  (Grimes) ;  Knox  (Deam). 

In  various  parts  of  White  County  it  has  a  tendency  to  spread  away 
from  the  fence  rows.  Reports  of  isolated  trees  occurring  along  the 
Tippecanoe  are  likely,  but  at  this  time  must  be  given  as  uncertain. 

Sassafras  varii folium  (L)  Karst.  Sassafras.  Although  but  one 
species  of  Sassafras  is  recognized,  two  forms  are  known  and  attention 
to  the  difference  is  here  noted.  "One  is  known  as  White  Sassafras, 
which  is  nearly  all  sap  wood,  and  the  bark  of  the  roots  is  white.  In 
contact  with  the  soil  the  wood  soon  rots.  The  other  is  known  as  the 
Red  Sassafras.  The  bark  of  the  roots  and  the  greater  part  of  the  wood 
is  red,  and  is  durable  in  contact  with  the  soil."*  Both  forms  are  com- 
mon in  White  County.  The  larger  trees  are  found  along  the  Tippecanoe 
near  Buffalo. 

Malus  malus  (L)  Brit,  Apple.  The  apple  tree  has  escaped  in 
various  parts  of  White  County  and  large  trees  are  sometimes  found. 


*  Deam   1911   Repoi-t.  pagre  238. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


456 


Plate  XXX. 

RANGE  OF 

Malus  ioensis  (Wood)  Britton. 

IN  THE  UNITED  STATES  AND  INDIANA. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


457 

It  is  not  included  in  the  1911  Report  nor  in  Coulter's  Catalogue.  Why 
should  it  not  receive  the  same  treatment  as  other  escapes?  (Toxylon, 
Populus  alba,  Ailanthus,  etc.) 

Malus  ioensis  (Wood)  Brit,  Western  Crab  Apple.  This  is  a  west- 
em  form,  as  the  range  map  shows  (p.  456).  A  broad-leaf  and  a  narrow- 
leaf  form  are  described  in  the  1911  Report.  Both  forms  occur  in  White 
County.  Specimens  were  taken  from  trees  on  a  low  sand  ridge  about 
one  mile  northeast  of  Reynolds.  (See  Deam  1911  Report,  pp.  248  and 
250.) 

Ainelanchier  canadensis  (L)  Medic,  Service-berry,  June-berry,  May 
or  Sand-cherry.  The  June-berry  remains  a  small  tree  in  White  County 
and  is  met  with  in  very  sparing  numbers  in  different  parts  of  the 
county.  The  specimens  taken  were  somewhat  variable,  but  it  is  thought 
all  belong  to  the  same  species. 

Crataegus  crus-galli  L,  Cockspur  Thorn,  Newcastle  Thorn.  A  small 
tree,  said  to  be  well  distributed  in  Indiana,  but  with  reports  only  from 
the  following  counties:  Decatur  (Mrs.  C.  C.  Deam);  Knox  and  Gibson 
(Schneck) ;  Owen  (Grimes) ;  Vigo  (Blatchley) ;  Crawford,  Jackson, 
Lawrence,  Posey  and  Wells  (Deam).  More  or  less  abundant  along  the 
Tippecanoe  and  in  sparing  numbers  over  the  county. 

Crataegus  calpodendron  (Ehrh)  Med,  Pear  Thorn,  Pear  or  Red 
Haw.  (C.  Crus-galli  Mill,  not  L.;  C.  tomentosa  DuRoi,  not  L.;  C.  Chap- 
man i  Ashe;  etc.).  Specimens  of  this  thorn  were  found  in  Honey  Creek, 
Monon  and  Union  Townships.  It  is  likely  to  be  found  in  others.  Speci- 
mens have  been  examined  from  the  following  counties:  Putnam 
(Grimes);  Marion,  Posey  and  Wells   (Deam). 

The  national  as  well  as  the  State  distribution  of  the  thorns  must 
be  as  yet  rather  uncertain.  For  notes  on  other  White  County  thorns 
see  pp.  445,  446. 

Prunus  americana  Marsh.  Wild  Red  Plum.  Found  throughout 
Indiana  and  reported  from  thirty-four  counties.  Single  trees  and  small 
clumps  in  various  parts  of  White  County. 

Prunus  serotina  Ehr,  Wild  (Black)  Cherry.  Common  in  all  parts 
of  the  State.  Very  common  in  White  County.  The  wood,  bark  and 
fruit  are  each  of  some  economic  importance. 

Zanthoxylum  americanum  Mill,  Prickly  Ash.  Toothache  Tree. 
According  to  Coulter's  Catalogue,  "A  small  tree,  sometimes  reduced  to 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


458 

a  shrub,  which  is  generally  distributed  over  the  State."  In  White 
County  it  is  most  commonly  found  along  the  Tippecanoe.  It  was  also 
noted  in  Ward's  thicket  in  Honey  Creek  Township  and  along  the  lower 
part  of  Big  Creek. 

Rhus  hirta  (L)  Sudw,  Staghorn  Sumac.  (Rhus  typhina  L.)  Said 
to  be  frequent  but  not  especially  abundant  in  any  of  its  stations  in 
various  parts  of  the  State.  Rather  abundant  in  some  places  of  White 
County.     Perhaps  the  most  common  sumac  in  the  county. 

RhiLs  glabra  L,  Smooth  Upland  or  Scarlet  Sumac.  This  sumac  is 
similar  to  the  preceding,  but  is  glabrous  throughout.  Reported  as  being 
more  common  in  the  State  than  the  above  species.  Well  distributed  but 
not  so  abundant  in  White  County. 

RhiLs  copallina  L,  Dwarf  Black  or  Mountain  Sumac.  Upland  Su- 
mac. This  form  becomes  a  distinct  small  tree  in  White  County.  Noted 
mostly  in  Honey  Creek  Township. 

The  above  three  species  are  rich  in  tanin  and  are  extensively  used 
for  tanning.  None  of  them  are  poisonous,  but  the  last  two  should  be 
handled  with  care  by  persons  with  thin,  sensitive  skins.  Another  species 
of  rhus,  R,  Toxicodendron  L.  (or  R.  radicans  L.) ,  the  Poison  Ivy,  which 
grows  both  as  a  climbing  vine  or  as  a  low  shrub,  is  very  poisonous.  The 
berries  are  not  poisonous  and  are  largely  eaten  by  birds.  The  poison 
ivy  is  commonly  met  with  in  different  parts  of  the  county. 

Ilex  verticillata  (L)  A,  Gray,  Virginia  Winter-berry,  Black  Alder, 
Fever-bush.  This  is  a  shrub,  attaining  a  height  of  6  feet  or  more. 
Abundant  in  White  County  as  well  as  in  the  State. 

Acer  saccharinum  L.  Soft,  Silver,  or  White  Maple.  Reported  from 
many  counties.  In  White  County  most  abundant  near  the  Tippecanoe. 
A  few  large  trees  (60  to  70  feet  high)  are  to  be  found  in  Fisher's 
Woods  one  mile  south  of  Reynolds.     Extensively  used  as  a  shade  tree. 

Acer  sacchariim  Marsh,  Sugar,  Rock,  or  Hard  Maple.  Reported 
as  frequent  to  common  in  all  parts  of  Indiana.  Of  uncertain  distribu- 
tion in  White  County.  Specimen  from  a  small  tree  about  four  and  one- 
fourth  miles  southeast  of  Chalmers  along  a  small  stream  near  the  banks 
of  Big  Creek. 

Acer  negundo  L.  Box  Elder,  Ash-leaved  or  Cut-leaved  Maple.  Rare 
east  of  the  Appalachians,  rare  to  infrequent  in  northern  Indiana.  Used 
to  some  extent  as  a  shade  tree  in  White  County.     Rather  inferior  tree. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


459 

escapes  easily.  Specimens  were  found  along  the  Tippecanoe,  near  Tioga, 
and  also  near  Buffalo.  Its  natural  migration  into  White  County  seems 
doubtful.  Escapes  were  also  noted  in  Honey  Creek  Township.  (For 
notes  on  A.  nigrum  see  p.  441.) 

Nyssa  sylvatica  Marsh.  Gum,  Black  or  Sour  Gum,  Pepperidge. 
Well  distributed  in  Indiana.  Frequent  to  common  in  White  County. 
A  tall  tree  attaining  a  greater  diameter  than  most  trees  in  the  county. 
The  leaves  are  variable  and  are  not  to  be  mistaken  for  those  of  N. 
aquatica  L.,  which  has  been  off  the  list  of  Indiana  trees.  (See  Deam 
1911  Report  p.  93,  also  pp.  321-323.) 

Comus  stolonifera  Michx.  Red  Osier,  Kinnikinnik.  Absent  from 
the  extreme  southern  counties,  but  abundant  in  the  northern  counties 
(Coulter's  Catalogue).  Found  in  all  parts  of  White  County.  Readily 
distinguished  by  its  bright  purple  twigs  at  some  distance.  Sometimes 
a  rather  tall,  thick-stemmed  shrub. 

Comus  femina  Mill,  Panicled  Cornel  or  Dogwood.  White-fruited 
Dogwood.  (C.  paniculata  L'Her.  1788;  C.  caudissima  Marsh.  1785;  not 
Mill.  1768.)  Reported  in  Coulter's  Catalogue  from  various  parts  of  the 
State.  Taller  in  White  County  than  is  noted  in  the  preceding  reference 
(3  to  6  feet  high).  Britton  and  Brown  give  it  a  height  of  6  to  15  feet. 
Many  specimens  in  White  County  arc  between  these  figures.  Often 
found  in  great  clumps  in  low,  wet  places  in  woods  or  in  the  open.  The 
fruit  is  white  and  usually  abundant.     (For  other  Cornels  see  p.  442.) 

Fraximis  americana  L.  White  Ash,  Gray  Ash.  This  ash  is  very 
common  along  the  Tippecanoe  and  is  distributed  over  the  county  gener- 
ally. Marked  differences  in  the  twigs  of  older  and  younger  trees  and 
other  minor  differences  were  noted.  Frequent  t^  common  in  all  parts 
of  the  State. 

Fraxinus  pennsylvanica  Marsh.  Curiously  enough  this  ash  is  vari- 
ously known  as  the  White,  Gray,  Black,  Green,  Red,  Blue,  Water, 
Swamp,  or  River  Ash.  It  also  bears  at  least  three  other  scientific  names, 
(F.  pubescens  Lam.;  F.  lanceolata  Borck.;  F.  viridis  Michx.  f.)  Its 
leaves,  and  especially  its  fruit,  are  very  variable.  (See  Deam  1911 
Report,  illustrations  p.  334.)  More  or  less  frequent  in  all  parts  of 
Indiana,  but  reported  from  only  twenty-two  counties.  Its  distribution 
for  White  County  is  not  determined;  specimens  were  taken  from  Honey 
Creek  Township,  southwest  of  Reynolds. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


460 


Plate  XXXI. 

RANGE  OF 

Vibumam  Lentago  L. 

IN  THE  UNITED  STATES  AND  INDIANA. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


461 


Plate  XXXII. 

RANGE  OF 

Viburnam  prunifolium  L. 

IN  THE  UNITED  STATES  AND  INDIANA. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


462 

The  above  two  species  were  the  only  ones  of  this  genus  found  in 
the  county.  This  was  a  disappointment,  since  F.  quadrangulata  Michx., 
and  F.  nigra  Marsh.,  are  reported  from  Cass,  Tippecanoe  and  a  number 
of  other  counties.     Both  of  these  may  occur  in  the  county. 

Cephalanthus  occidentalis  L,  Button-bush,  Honey-balls,  Pond-Dog- 
wood, etc.  An  abundant  shrub  or  small  tree  (20  feet  high)  in  all  parts 
of  the  State  (Coulter).  Found  in  all  parts  of  White  County,  though 
not  so  abundant  as  a  medium-sized  shrub.  Easily  recognized  by  its 
flowers. 

Vihurnam  lentago  L.    Sheep-berry,  Nanny-berry,  Black  Haw,  etc. 

Vibumam  prunifolium  L.  Black  Haw,  Stag-bush,  etc.  It  is  some- 
what surprising  to  find  that  the  latter,  having  a  much  smaller  range  in 
the  United  States,  should  be  reported  from  so  many  more  counties  in 
Indiana  than  the  former  with  its  very  great  range.  (See  range  maps 
pp.  460  and  461.)  In  so  far  as  I  have  been  able  to  discover,  the  former 
is  far  more  plentiful  in  White  County,  sometimes  forming  great  patches 
on  cut-over  areas.     The  fruit  of  both  is  sweet  and  edible. 

Sambucus  canadensis  L,  Elder-berry.  Abundant  throughout  the 
State  in  various  situations  (Coulter).  Common  in  White  County.  The 
flowers  and  fruit  have  strong  medicinal  properties.     (Brit.  &  Br.) 

Juniperus  virginiana  L.  Red  Cedar,  Juniper,  etc.  This  is  the  only 
native  evergreen  of  the  county.  Reported  from  various  counties  with 
different  degrees  of  abundance.  Well  distributed  in  White  County, 
reaching  its  best  development  along  the  Tippecanoe.  Many  trees,  some 
of  fair  size,  were  found  about  two  miles  up  from  the  mouth  of  Big 
Creek. 

(For  other  species  distributed  more  or  less  generally  over  the  county 
see  The  Oaks,  pp.  405-433,  and  the  Hickories,  pp.  433-436.) 

V.    ECONOMIC  USES. 

The  original  forest  of  White  County  must  have  been  extensive  and 
must  have  exhibited  a  high-grade  quality  of  timber  quite  generally.  For 
several  decades  after  1830  there  were  numerous  sawmills  operating  in 
various  parts  of  the  county.  Some  of  the  pits,  wells  or  other  vestiges 
of  these  mills  are  still  to  be  seen,  though  perhaps  the  location  of  most 
of  them  is  a  matter  of  speculation. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


463 

The  results  of  individual  inquiry  concerning  the  specific  activities 
of  these  early  sawmills  were  very  meagre,  but  through  the  efforts  of 
Mr.  Ed  Newton  of  Monticello,  Ind.,  I  am  able  to  cite  a  few  definite 
historical  accounts. 

Historical  Sketch  of  the  Sawmills  of  White  County. 

In  1830  Joseph  Rothrock  built  a  brush  dam  across  the  Tippecanoe 
River  at  Tioga,  south  of  Monticello,  and  installed  a  sawmill,  which  was 
probably  the  first  mill  built  in  White  County.  It  never  amounted  to 
much  and  its  location  is  now  only  a  memory. 

A  Norwegian,  Hans  Erasmus  Hiorth,  bought  a  thousand-acre  tract 
of  land  in  1832  and  laid  out  the  town  of  Norway,  north  of  Monticello. 
He  built  a  timber  dam  across  the  Tippecanoe,  set  up  two  sawmills  and 
operated  them  by  power  obtained  from  the  dam.  They  were  run  very 
successfully  for  many  years,  but  have  now  been  dismantled  for  over  a 
third  of  a  century. 

In  1848  a  dam  was  built  across  the  Tippecanoe  at  Monticello  and 
in  the  following  year  Zebulin  Sheetz  built  the  first  sawmill  in  Monti- 
cello, operating  it  with  power  obtained  from  the  dam.  A  second  mill 
was  built  later  by  Hoagland  &  Conklin.  Both  of  these  mills  have  been 
dismantled  for  some  forty  years  and  their  very  location  is  forgotten. 

In  1882  W.  E.  Meyers  built  a  steam  sawmill  at  Idaville,  capable  of 
cutting  from  6,000  to  8,000  feet  of  lumber  per  day.  This  mill  was  run 
for  several  years  very  successfully,  but  has  gone  the  way  of  all  the 
preceding. 

Definite  history  for  a  mill  operated  by  the  Wrights  along  the  Tippe- 
canoe between  Monticello  and  Buffalo  was  not  available. 

At  present  there  are  a  number  of  portable  sawmills  distributed  over 
the  county.  These  are  operated  by  thrashing-machine  engines  and  their 
owners  will  locate  wherever  there  is  10,000  feet  or  more  of  timber  to  cut. 

The  only  active  stationary  mills  coming  to  my  knowledge  are  those 
of  Pierce  &  Son  at  Bumettsville  and  that  of  John  H.  Knickerbocker  at 
Monticello.  The  Pierce  mill  has  been  running  for  several  years,  but 
the  latter,  which  uses  electric  power,  was  staited  only  last  summer. 
But  very  little  of  the  material  cut  at  either  mill  is  shipped,  most  of  the 
lumber  being  used  in  the  immediate  vicinity. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


464 

The  lumber  concerns  of  Monticello  report  no  sales  of  native  timber 
for  a  number  of  years.  This  is  also  true  for  concerns  in  Idaville  and 
Brookston.  The  Colbom-Dye  Company  of  Wolcott,  however,  in  looking 
over  their  files  for  the  past  five  years,  find  the  following  statistics: 

Table  III. 

White  County  Oak  Bought  and  Sold  by  the  Colbom-Dye  Company 

of  Wolcott, 

1911   25,100  feet. 

1912 8,878  feet. 

1913   7,868  feet. 

1914   22,622  feet. 

1915   11,813  feet. 

Total    76,271  feet. 

"We  have  probably  had  3,000  to  4,000  feet  from 
our  local  people,  which  is  not  included  in  the  above. 
The  figures  given  above  are  all  for  oak  timber  shipped 
from  Burnetts  Creek." 

Several  carloads  of  walnut  were  shipped  from  Monticello  in  the 
spring  of  1915. 

Messrs.  Reed,  Spencer  &  Wright  of  Wolcott  have  bought  and  are 
cutting  for  shipment  a  quantity  of  white  oak  cast  of  Monticello. 

The  figures  for  a  mill  near  Rejmolds,  covering  four  active  years, 
are  as  follows.      (Thomas  Lemon.) 

Table  IV. 

1907.  1908.  1912.  1914.  Total. 

Feet  of  lumber 51,704  63,490  76,819  6,345  198,358 

Cords  of  wood 719  1,158            211  2,086 

Railroad  ties 3,159  4,906  583  8,648 

Fence  posts 3,501          3,501 

A  reply  from  Brookston  (M.  B.  Yount)  enumerates  various  cuts  of 
lumber  aggregating  51,000  feet,  as  follows: 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


465 


Table  V. 


7,000  feet  1-inch  board  finishing  lumber  @  $30-$50  per  100  feet. 
15,000  feet  2%-inch  bridge  plank  @  $30  per  100  feet. 

7,000  feet  1-inch  boards  @  $25  per  100  feet. 
22,000  feet  of  2  x  4  and  2  x  6,  8,  10,  12,  14,  16  feet  long,  @  $25. 
All  oak — some  white  oak,  little  black  oak,  remainder  red  oak.  (1915.) 

Table  VI. 

Jacob  Dieter  of  Reynolds  reports: 

5,000  railroad  cross-ties. 
245,000  feet  of  lumber. 

5,000  fence  posts. 
All  black  and  white  oak. 

Mr.  Wm.  F.  Prall  has  done  much  cutting  on  the  Bunnell  estate 
near  Reynolds  and  reports  the  following  figures  for  the  period  of  Sep- 
tember, 1915,  to  March,  1916: 

Table  VII. 

10,000  railroad  cross-ties. 
25,000  feet  of  lumber. 

In  nearly  this  same  time  he  has  cut  200,000  feet  of  lumber  in  Car- 
roll County  just  across  the  White  County  line. 

The  reports  from  the  above  five  sources  make  a  grand  total  of 
574,129  feet  of  lumber,  43,648  railroad  cross-ties,  8,501  fence  posts  and 
2,086  cords  of  wood.  Other  mills  in  the  county  will  show  as  high  and 
possibly  higher  figures.  Besides  the  output  of  these  portable  mills  using 
up  native  timber  there  is,  speaking  comparatively,  a  considerable  amount 
of  timber  cut  up  as  cord  wood  and  fence  posts.  The  supply  is  becoming 
less  and  less  each  year,  and  were  the  county  at  once  deprived  of  all 
the  timber  now  left,  the  lack  of  this  valuable  resource  still  remaining, 
I  am  sure,  would  be  keenly  felt. 

Much  timber  land  has  been  cleared  for  agricultural  purposes  and 
this  work  is  still  in  progress.    Very  often  parties  have  been  so  anxious 

30—11994 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


466 

to  clear  a  section  that  timber  was  given  away  for  the  work  of  its 
removal.  Practices  in  clearing  have  often  been  very  wasteful.  I  men- 
tion this  with  the  very  contrasting  idea  in  mind  of  how  governments 
and  foresters  are  taking  every  precaution  to  conserve  the  rapidly  dimin- 
ishing forests  by  preventing  and  controlling  fires,  insect  and  fungous 
pests.  Man  seems  to  enter  as  the  most  destructive  agent  of  all,  not 
alone  by  being  merely  uneconomical  but  by  lacking  judgment  in  making 
cause  for  erosion,  or  perhaps  denuding,  a  place  entirely  unfit  for  any 
other  purpose.  Forest  management  and  care  of  trees  generally  is  almost 
entirely  unknown  in  White  County,  as  it  doubtless  is  in  many  other 
counties  of  the  State.  Further  than  that,  any  admonition  to  take  care 
of  the  forests  would  seem  absurd  to  most  citizens.  And  yet  some  have 
seen  fit  to  set  out  little  groves  of  the  much  heralded  but  rather  over- 
rated catalpa.  White  County  is  an  integral  part  of  the  hardwood  area 
of  the  country  and  as  such  merits  its  share  of  attention. 

Below  is  given  a  summary  covering  some  interesting  features  taken 
from  a  report  of  the  Department  of  Labor  and  Commerce,  Bureau  of 
Corporations  (The  Lumber  Industry,  Part  I,  Standing  Timber,  Jan.  20, 
1913).  Figures  for  White  County  in  comparison  with  the  following 
data  are  not  available.  Those  acquainted  with  the  area  or  any  other 
part  of  the  State  may  draw  their  own  conclusions.         ' 

The  total  amount  of  standing  timber  in  the  continental  United 
States,  suitable  for  the  manufacture  of  lumber  under  present  standards 
in  the  industry,  is  about  2,800  billion  board  feet,  of  which  2,200  billion, 
or  787',  is  privately  owned.  (Unit  is  the  board  foot,  which  is  1  foot 
square  and  1  inch  thick.) 

The  present  (1913)  commercial  value  of  the  privately  owned  stand- 
ing timber  is  about  $6,000,000,000,  and  is  becoming  more  and  more  val- 
uable. The  yearly  drain  on  saw  timber  is  about  fifty  billion  board  feet. 
Only  fifty-six  years'  supply  remains. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


467 


TABLE  VIII.    COMPARISONS  OF  CUT  OF  LUMBER  BY  SPECIES.* 

SofTWOODS. 


United  States. 

Indiana. 

Illinois. 

Ohio. 

Michigan. 

Active  mills  reporting 

Total  lumber  cut 

Yellow  pine 

48,112 

44,509,761 

16,277.185 

4.856,378 

3.900,034 

3.051,399 

1,748.547 

1,499.485 

955.635 

521.630 

108.702 

346,008 

204,022 

157.192 

89.318 

1,604 
556,418 

827 
170,181 

1.632 
542.904 

1,323 
1.889.724 

Douglas  fir 

203 
8.415 

78 

White  pine 

Hemlock 

Spruce 

64 
432 

153 

258,080 

614.622 

21,797 

Western  pine... 

Cypress 

4.186 

Redwood 

Bal<iam  fir 

9.645 
17.647 

■  44.956  ' 

Cedar 

I^rch 

Tamarack 

White  fir     

595 

30 
152 

16 

48' 

Total  softwood 

33.896.959 

1.216 

4.521 

10.389 

996.747 

TABLE  IX. 
Hardwoods. 


United  States. 

Indiana. 

Illinois. 

Ohio. 

Michigan. 

Oak 

4,414.457 
1.106.604 
858.500 
706.945 
663,891 
511,244 
452.370 
399.151 
347,456 
265,600 
291.209 
333,929 
96,676 
46.108 
56.511 
24.594 
37.557 

228.343 
43,644 
29,174 
23.649 

2.789 
98.729 

1.216 
13.917 
40,364 

4.143 

23,488 

23.513 

262 

7,669 
11,003 

1,969 

1,330 

101,279 
7.163 
3.628 
9,748 

259.410 
43.852 
42,317 

2.194 
16.424 
49.421 
856 
16,007 
33.182 

2.944 
25,753 
21.774 

40,023 

Maple 

Yellow  poplar 

Red  pim 

Chestnut 

543,214 

Beech 

Birch 

Basewood 

Elm 

Cottonwood 

Ash 

Hickory 

Tupelo 

1.472 

475 

587 

12.102 

3.939 

2,894 

11.095 

764 

5.051 

5.073 

163 

227 

111,340 
64,341 
69,453 
58,321 

6,384 
24.865 

1.850 

Walnut 

Sycamore 

Cherry 

All  others 

8,580 
5.243 
2.105 
2.453 

184 

749 

1.587 

666 

Total  hardwood 

10,612.802 

555,202 

165.660 

532,515 

922.977 

•Table  18,  pp.  88,  89,  90,  91,  92.    Department  of  Commerce  and  Labor,  Bureau  of  Corporations. 
The  Lumber  Industry,  Part  I,  January,  1913. 

Table  X. 

Indiana  ranks  26th  in  total  lumber  cut  in  the  United  States. 

Indiana  ranks  9th  in  hardwoods  cut. 

Indiana  is  a  poor  last  in  softwoods  cut.     (Illinois  next.) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


468 


The  greatest  softwood  States  in  the  Union  in  order  are:  Wash- 
ington, Louisiana,  Mississippi,  Texas,  Oregon,  North  Carolina,  Alabama, 
Minnesota,  Virginia,  Wisconsin,  Arkansas,  Georgia,  California,  etc. 

The  greatest  hard  wood  States  in  the  Union  in  order  are:  Ten- 
nessee, Michigan,  West  Virginia,  Kentucky,  Arkansas,  Pennsylvania, 
Virginia,  Wisconsin,  Indiana,  Ohio,  Missouri,  Mississippi,  North  Caro- 
lina, etc. 


Indiana  ranks  9 
7 
7 
7 

15 
2 

14 
7 
3 

12 
5 
5 

14 
2 
1 
5 
9 


Table  XL 
n  Oak. 
n  Maple, 
n  Yellow  Poplar, 
n  Red  Gum. 
n  Chestnut. 

n  Beech.    (Mich,  first.) 
n  Birch, 
n  Basswood. 
n  Elm.    (Wis.,  Mich.) 
n  Cottonwood. 

n  Ash.    (Ark.,  Wis.,  O.,  Mich.) 
in  Hickory.    (Tenn.,  Ark.,  Ky.,  Mo.) 
n  Tupelo.    (La.,  Va.) 

n  Walnut.    (O.,  Ind.,  Ky.,  Tenn.    Supply  very  short) 
n  Sycamore.  (Ind.,  Mo.  close  second.  Ark.  poor  third.) 
n  Cherry.    (W.  Va.,  Pa.,  N.  Y.,  O.,  Ind.) 
n  all  others.    (Ky.  big  first.) 


Table  XII. 

Number  of  Indiana  Sawmills,  Grouped  According  to  Output, 

Total  sawmills 1,599  1,000-  2,500  M 80 

Less  than  50  M 195  2,500-  5,000  M 26 


50-    500  M 1,121 

500-1,000  M 173 


5,000-10,000  M 3 

10,000-15,000  M 1 


The  pioneers  in  White  County  used  much  timber  for  log  houses, 
fuel,  and  rail  fences.  Much  is  still  us3d  for  house  and  barn  sills,  bridge 
stringers  and  planks.     Fence  posts  and  corner  braces,  with  wire,  have 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


469 

long  ago  taken  the  place  of  rail  fences,  although  one  can  still  find  some 
rail  fences  in  existence.  Old  settlers  tell  of  much  wood  being  formerly 
used  as  fuel  by  the  railroads  at  their  inception.  For  domestic  use  wood 
is  still  the  chief  fuel  in  the  county.  Formerly  most  fuel  wood  was  cut 
in  "full  cord  wood"  length,  now  it  is  nearly  all  cut  in  "block  wood" 
length.  Not  much  pole  wood  is  sold.  So  far  as  I  know,  very  little 
White  County  timber  gets  to  manufacturing  establishments. 

VI.    SUMMARY. 

With  the  completion  of  this  thesis  it  is  not  meant  that  the  final 
word  on  Trees  of  White  County  has  been  said.  More  observation  is 
necessary  to  complete  ranges  within  the  county,  and  more  material  is 
necessary  to  determine  some  species  definitely.  Very  likely  a  few  species 
have  escaped  observation. 

Sixty-two  out  of  125  trees  reported  for  the  State  have  been  found 
in  White  County;  17  small  trees  or  large  shrubs  are  noted,  in  addition 
to  two  new  varieties  for  the  State. 

The  likelihood  of  a  new  willow  and  a  new  thorn  for  the  State  are 
mentioned.     A  new  variety  of  willow  is  also  reported. 

The  peculiar  oak  found  northeast  of  Brookston  needs  further  inves- 
tigation, as  do  all  of  the  above,  and  other  species  as  well. 

Lack  of  time  has  precluded  further  data  being  included. 

Bibliography. 

1.  American  Forestry  Magazine,  Vol.  21,  No.  260.     Aug.,  1915. 

The  Tulip-tree  or  Yellow  Poplar. 

2.  American  Forestry  Magazine,  Vol.  21,  No.  263.     Nov.,  1915. 

The  Sugar  Maple.     By  S.  B.  Detwiler. 

3.  American  Forestry  Magazine,  Vol.  21,  No.  264.     Dec,  1915. 

The  White  Ash.     By  S.  B.  Detwiler. 

The   Biggest    Shade   Tree   Is    Also   the   Best.      (Sycamore   at 
Worthington.) 

4.  American  Forestry  Magazine,  Vol.  22,  No.  265.     Jan.,  1915. 

The  American  White  Oak.     By  S.  B.  Detwiler. 

5.  Anderson,  H.  W.     Proc.  Ind.  Acad,  of  Sci.,  pp.  197-202.     1913. 

The  Taxation  of  Forest  Lands  in  Indiana. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


470 

6.  Andrews,  F.  M.     Proc.  Ind.  Acad,  of  Sci.,  pp.  203-212.     1913. 

Forests  and  Floods. 

7.  Blakeslee,  A.  F.,  and  Jarvis,  C.  D.    Macmillan  Co.,  N.  Y.     1913. 

Trees  in  Winter. 

8.  Britton,  N.  L.     Henry  Holt  &  Co.,  N.  Y.     1908. 

North  American  Trees. 

9.  Britton,  N.   L.,   and   Brown,   A.     Charles  Scribner's   Sons,   N.    Y. 

Second  Edition. 
Illustrated  Flora  of  the  Northern  States  and  Canada. 

10.  Cockerell,  T.  D.  H.     Cycl.  of  Am.  Agri.,  Vol.  1,  p.  20. 

Life  Zones  of  North  America. 

11.  Coulter,  Stanley. 

Flora  of  Indiana. 

12.  Coulter,  Stanley.     Ind.  State  Bd.  of  Forestry.     1912. 

Suggestions  for  the  Improvement  of  Indiana  Woodlots. 

13.  Coulter,  Stanley.     Proc.  Ind.  Acad,  of  Sci.     1913. 

First  Steps  in  Indiana  Forestry. 

14.  Coulter,  Stanley.     Proc.  Ind.  Acad,  of  Sci.     1914. 

Notes  Upon  the  Distribution  of  Forest  Trees  in  Indiana. 

15.  Cowles,  H.  D.     Bot.  Gazette,  Vol.  27,  No.  2.     Feb.,  1899. 

The  Ecological  Relations  of  the  Vegetation  of  the  Sand  Dunes 
of  Lake  Michigan. 

16.  Cowles,  H.  D.     Bot.  Gazette,  Vol.  31,  No.  2.     Feb.,  1901. 

The  Physiographic  Ecology  of  Chicago  and  Vicinity. 

17.  Cowles,  H.  D.     Bot.  Gazette,  Vol.  31,  No.  3.    March,  1901. 

Continuation  of  the  above. 

18.  Deam,  C.  C.     Eleventh  Annual  Report  of  the  Indiana  State  Board 

of  Forestry.     1911. 
Trees  of  Indiana. 

19.  Deam,  C.  C.     Report  Indiana  State  Board  of  Forestry.     1912. 

Shade  Trees. 

20.  Fuller,  G.  D.     Bot.  Gazette,  Vol.  38,  No.  3.     Sept.,  1914. 

Evaporation  and  Soil  Moisture  in  Relation  to  the  Succession  of 
Plant  Societies. 

21.  Fuller,  G.  D.     Bot.  Gazette,  Vol.  52,  No.  3.     Sept.,  1911. 

Evaporation  and  Succession. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


471 

22.  Gates,  R.  R.     Bot.  Gazette,  Vol.  61,  No.  3.     March,  191G. 

On  Pairs  of  Species. 

23.  Gray's  New  Manual  of  Botany,  7th  Ed.     1908. 

24.  Hough,  R.  B.     Handbook  of  the  Trees  of  the  Northern  States  and 

Canada.     1907. 

25.  Livingston,  B.  E.     Bot.  Gazette,  Vol.  39,  No.  1.    Jan.,  1905. 

The  Relation  of  Soils  to  Natural  Vegetation  in  Roscommon  and 
Crawford  Counties,  Michigan. 

26.  Moore,  Barrington.     Bot.  Gazette,  Vol.  61,  No.  1.     Jan.,  1916. 

Notes  on  the  Succession  from  Pine  to  Oak. 

27.  Sargent,  C.  S.     Houghton,  Mifflin  Co.,  N.  Y.     1905. 

Manual  of  the  Trees  of  North  America. 

28.  Huntington,  Annie  Oaks.     Knight  &  Millet,  Boston.     1905. 

Studies  of  Trees  in  Winter. 

29.  Schimper,  A.  W.  F.     Authorized  English  Translation.     By  Wm.  R. 

Fisher.      Revised   by   Groom   and    Balfour,   Oxford,    Eng. 
Clarendon  Press.     1903. 
Plant  Geography  Upon  a  Physiological  Basis. 

30.  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agri.     Forest  Service. 

Statistical  Atlas.     1907. 

31.  U.  S.  Dept.  of  Agri.     Bulletin  No.  316.     By  Geo.  N.  Lamb. 

Willows:    Their  Growth,  Use  and  Importance. 

32.  U.    S.   Dept.   of  Commerce  and   Labor.     Bureau   of   Corporations. 

Jan.  20,  1913. 
The  Lumber  Industry.     Part  I.     Standing  Timber. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


INDEX 


A. 

PAGE 

Act  for  Publication  of  Reports 8 

Appropriation  for  1917-1918 ' 9 

Andrews,  F.  M. — 

Studies  on  Pollen 163 

Stoppage  of  a  Sewer  Line  by  Roots  of  Acer  Saccharum 165 

Anthocyanin  of  Beta  Vulgaris 167 

Improved  Forms  of  Maximows'  Automatic  Pipette 169 

The  Effect  of  Centrifugal  Force  on  Plants 175 

The  Absorption  of  Iron  by  Platinum  Crucible  in  Clay  Fusions,  Wm. 

M.  Blanchard  and  Roscoe  Theibert 189 

Artificial  Selection  on  Bristle  Number  in  Drosophila  Ampelophila, 

The  Effect  of,  Fernandus  Payne 249 

Anthocyanin  of  Beta  Vulgaris,  F.  M.  Andrews 167 

B. 

By-laws 7 

Beals,  C.  C— 

The  Effect  of  Aeration  of  the  Roots  of  Zea  Mays 177 

Brief  Notes  on  the  New  Castle  Tornado 219 

Behrens,  C.  A.,  The  Erdmann  New  Culture  for  Protozoa 297 

Blanchard,  William,  The  Absorption  of  Iron  by  Platinum  Crucible 

in  Clay  Fusions 189 

C. 

Constitution 5 

Committees,  1918 12 

A  Comparison  of  Plant  Succession  on  Hudson  River  Limestone  with 

That  on  Niagara  Limestone,  M.  S.  Markle 109 

Chemical  Estimation  on  the  Fertility  of  Soils  in  Fulton  County, 

Indiana,  R.  H.  Carr  and  W.  K.  Gast 201 

Carr,  R.  H.,  Chemical  Estimation  on  the  Fertility  of  Soils  in  Fulton 

County,  Indiana 201 

Clark,  Howard  Walton,  The  Unionidae  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee 251 

Cromwell,  Hobart,  Further  Experiments  with  the  Mutant,  Scarlet, 

from  Drosophila  Repleta 287 

Conner,  S.  D.,  The  Injurious  Effect  of  Borax  in  Fertilizers  on  Com  195 
Com  Pollination,  Improved  Technique  for,  Paul  Weatherwax 105 

(473) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


474 

D. 

PAGE 

Dryer,  Charles  R.,  The  Physiography  of  Indianapolis 55 

Dwarfing  Effect  of  Attacks  of  Mites  of  the  Genus  Eriophyes  Upon 

Norway  Maples,  Howard  E.  Enders 79 

Disposition  and  Intelligence  of  the  Chimpanzee,  W.  Henry  Sheak . .  301 

E. 

Eigenmann,  Carl  H.,  The  Pygidiidae 59 

An  Epidemic  Among  the  Fishes  of  Huffman's  Lake,  Will  Scott 67 

Enders,  Howard  E.,  Dwarfing  Effect  of  Attacks  of  Mites  of  the 

Genus  Eriophyes  Upon  Norway  Maples 79 

The  Effect  of  Centrifugal  Force  on  Plants,  F.  M.  Andrews 175 

The  Effect  of  Aeration  of  the  Roots  of  Zea  Mays,  C.  C.  Reals 177 

The  Injurious  Effect  of  Borax  in  Fertilizers  on  Com,  S.  D.  Conner. .  195 

Evans,  P.  N.,  Sulphur  By-products  of  the  Preparation  of  Ether 211 

The  Effect  of  Tobacco  Smoke  and  of  Methyl  Iodide  Vapor  on  the 

Growth  of  Certain  Micro-organisms,  C.  A.  Ludwig 217 

Energy  Losses  in  Commercial  Hammers,  Edwin  Morrison  and  Robert 

Retry 245 

Further   Experiments  with  the  Mutant,   Scarlet,  from   Drosophila 

Repleta,  Hobart  Cromwell 287 

The  Erdmann  New  Culture  Medium  for  Protozoa,  C.  A.  Behrens 

and  H.  C.  Travelbee 297 

Evermann,  Barton  Warren,  The  Unionidae  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee. .  251 

F. 

Fall  Meeting,  Minutes  of 43 

Foresman,  G.  K.,  Sulphur  By-products  of  the  Preparation  of  Ether  211 
Where  Feeble-minded  Are  Self-supporting,  Hazel  Hansford 85 

G. 

Germinal  Changes  in  the  Bar-eyed  Race  of  Drosophila,  Chas.  Zeleny     73 
Gast,  W.  K.,  Chemical  Estimation  of  the  Fertility  of  Soils  in  Fulton 

County,  Indiana 201 

H. 

Hunting  Wild  Birds— Penalty 10 

Hansford,  Hazel,  Where  the  Feeble-minded  are  Self-supporting. ...     85 
Hess,  Walter  N.,  A  Seasonal  Study  of  the  Kidney  of  the  Five-spined 

Stickleback   295 

Heimlich,  Louis  F.,  The  Trees  of  White  County,  Indiana 387 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


475 
I. 

PAGE 

Certain  Indicia  of  Dip  in  Rocks,  William  N.  Logan 229 

J. 
Jackson,  H.  S. — 

The  Ustilaginales  of  Indiana 119 

The  Uredinales  of  Indiana,  II 133 

The  Uredinales  of  Delaware 311 

K. 
Knipp,  Charles  T. — 

An  Improved  Form  of  Mercury  Vapor  Air  Pump 241 

A  Possible  Standard  of  Sound 243 

L. 
Logan,  William  N. — 

The  Mount  Carmel  Fault 221 

Utilization  of  Indiana  Kaolin 227 

Certain  Indicia  of  Dip  in  Rocks 229 

Ludwig,  C.  A. — 

The  Effect  of  Tobacco  Smoke  and  Methyl  Iodide  Vapor  on  the 

Growth  of  Certain  Micro-organisms 217 

M. 

Members — 

Active 24 

Fellows 15 

Non-resident  Members  and  Fellows 20 

Mottier,  D.  M.,  Plastids 97 

Markle,  M.  S.— 

A  Comparison  of  Plant  Succession  on  the  Hudson  River  Lime- 
stone with  That  on  Niagara  Limestone 109 

Notes  on  Microscopic  Technique 115 

Microscopic  Technique  Notes  on  Maximows'  Automatic  Pipette,  Im- 
proved Forms  of,  F.  M.  Andrews 169 

The  Mount  Carmel  Fault,  William  N.  Logan 221 

Mercury  Vapor  Air  Pump,  An  Improved  Form  of,  Charles  Knipp. .  241 

Morrison,  Edwin,  Energy  Losses  in  Commercial  Hammers 245 

N. 

Noyes,  H.  A.,  Reaction  of  Culture  Media 149 

Nothnagel,  Mildred,  Resistance  of  Mucor  Zygotes 181 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


476 

PAGE 

Brief  Notes  on  Field  Methods  Used  in  Geological  Work  of  Mid-con- 
tinental Oil  Fields,  Louis  Roark 235 

New  Castle  Tornado,  Brief  Notes  on,  C.  C.  Beals 219 

O. 

Officers  of  1918 11 

Officers  of  Former  Years 13 

Osner,  George  A.,  Additions  to  the  List  of  Plant  Diseases  of  Eco- 
nomic Importance  in  Indiana 145 

P. 

Petry,  Robert  L.,  Energy  Losses  in  Commercial  Hammers 245 

Payne,  Fernandus,  Artificial  Selection  in  Bristle  Number  in  Droso- 

phila  Ampelophila 249 

Progi-am  of  Thirty-third  Annual  Meeting 49 

The  Physiography  of  Indianapolis,  Charles  R.  Dryer 55 

The  Pygidiidae,  Carl  H.  Eigenmann 59 

Plastids,  D.  M.  Mottier 97 

Pipal,  F.  J.,  A  Suspected  Case  of  Stock  Poisoning  by  Wild  Onions. .  139 
Plant  Diseases  of  Economic  Importance  in  Indiana,  Addition  to  the 

List  of,  George  A.  Osner 145 

Pollen,  Studies  on,  F.  M.  Andrews 163 

R. 

Reaction  of  Culture  Media,  H,  A.  Noyes 149 

Resistance  of  Mucor  Zygotes,  Mildred  Nothnagel 181 

Roark,  Louis,  Brief  Notes  on  Field  Methods  Used  in  Geological  Work 

of  Mid-continental  Oil  Fields 235 

S. 

Spring  Meeting,  Minutes  of 39 

Scott,  Will,  An  Epidemic  Among  the  Fishes  of  Huffman's  Lake 67 

A  Study  of  the  Action  of  Bacteria  on  Milk  Proteins,  George  Spitzer 

and  H.  M.  Weeter 91 

Spitzer,  George,  A  Study  of  the  Action  of  Bacteria  on  Milk  Proteins  91 
Stock  Poisoning  by  Wild  Onion,  Allium  Canadense,  A  Suspected  Case 

of,  F.  J.  Pipal 139 

Stoppage  of  a  Sewer  Line  by  Roots  of  Acer  Saccharum,  F.  M.  An- 
drews     165 

Sulphur  By-products  in  the  Preparation  of  Ether,  P.  N.  Evans  and 

G.  K.  Foresman 211 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


47 


PAGE 

Standard  of  Sound,  A  Possible,  Charles  T.  Knipp 243 

A   Sectional  Study  of  the  Kidney  of  the  Five-spined  Stickleback, 

Walter  N.  Hess 295 

Sheak,  W.  Henry,  Disposition  and  Intelligence  of  the  Chimpanzee. .  301 

T. 

Theibert,  Roscoe,  The  Absorption  of  Iron  by  Platinum  Crucible  in 

Clay  Fusions 189 

Travelbee,  H.  C,  The  Erdmann  New  Culture  Medium  for  Protozoa  297 

The  Trees  of  White  County,  Indiana,  Louis  F.  Heimlich 387 

U. 

The  Ustilaginales  of  Indiana,  H.  S.  Jackson 119 

The  Uredinales  of  Indiana,  II,  H.  S.  Jackson 133 

Utilization  of  Indiana  Kaolin,  William  N.  Logan 227 

The  Unionidae  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee,  Barton  Warren  Evermann  and 

Howard  Walton  Clark 251 

The  Uredinales  of  Delaware,  H.  S.  Jackson 311 

V. 
Variation  and  Varieties  of  Zea  Mays,  Paul  Weatherwax 99 

W. 

Weatherwax,  Paul — 

Variation  and  Varieties  of  Zea  Mays 99 

Improved  Technique  for  Com  Pollination 105 

Weeter,  H.  M.,  A  Study  of  the  Action  of  Bacteria  on  Milk  Proteins    91 

Z. 

Zeleny,  Charles,  Germinal  Changes  in  the  Bar-eyed  Race  of  Droso- 

phila  73 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


PROCEEDINGS 


I  ndiana  Academy  of  Science 

1918 


LEE  F.  BENNETT,  Editor 


INDIANAPOLIS : 

WM.    B.    BURPORD,    CONTRACTOR     FOR    STATE    PRINTING    AND    BINDING 
1919 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


CONTENTS. 


H. 


f\ 


PAGF 

Constitution 6 

By-Laws 7 

"^        Public  Offenses — Hunting  Birds — Penalty 9 

Officers,  1918-1919 10 

rj        Committees,  Academy  of  Science,  1919 11 

<        Officers  of  the  Academy  of  Science  (A  Table  of) 12 

'        Members 14 

Fellows 14 

Non-Resident  Members  and  Fellows 18 

Active  Members 21 

Minutes  of  the  Spring  Meeting 32 

Program  of  the  Thirty-fourth  Annual  Meeting 37 

j^    Minutes  of  the. Thirty-fourth  Annual  Meeting 42 

J        Papers — President's  Address 45 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


CONSTITUTION. 


ARTICLE  I. 

Secttion  1.  This  association  shall  be  called  the  Indiana  Academy  of 
Science. 

Sec.  2.  The  objects  of  this  Academy  shall  be  scientific  research  and 
the  diffusion  of  knowledge  concerning  the  various  departments  of  science ; 
to  promote  intercourse  between  men  eng^aged  in  scientific  work,  especially 
in  Indiana;  to  assist  by  investigation  and  discussion  in  developing  and 
making  known  the  material,  educational  and  other  resources  and  riches 
of  the  State;  to  arrange  and  prepare  for  publication  such  reports  of 
investigation  and  discussion  as  may  further  the  aims  and  objects  of  the 
Academy  as  set  forth  in  these  articles. 

Whereas,  The  State  has  undertaken  the  publication  of  such  proceed- 
ings, the  Academy  will,  upon  request  of  the  Governor,  or  one  of  the 
several  departments  of  the  State,  through  the  Governor,  act  through  its 
council  as  an  advisory  body  in  the  direction  and  execution  of  any  inves- 
tigation within  its  province  as  stated.  The  necessary  expenses  incurred 
in  the  prosecution  of  such  investigation  are  to  be  borne  by  the  State;  no 
pecuniary  g^ain  is  to  come  to  the  Academy  for  its  advice  or  direction  of 
such  investigation. 

The  regular  proceedings  of  the  Academy  as  published  by  the  State 
shall  become  a  public  document. 

ARTICLE  II. 

Section  1.  Members  of  this  Academy  shall  be  honorary  fellows, 
fellows,  non-resident  members,  and  active  members. 

Sec.  2.  Any  person  engaged  in  any  department  of  scientific  work, 
or  in  any  original  research  in  any  department  of  science,  shall  be  eligible 
to  active  membership.  Active  members  may  be  annual  or  life  members. 
Annual  members  may  be  elected  at  any  meeting  of  the  Academy;  they 
shall  sign  the  constitution,  pay  an  admission  fee  of  two  dollars  and  there- 
after an  annual  fee  of  one  dollar.  Any  person  who  shall  at  one  time 
contribute  fifty  dollars  to  the  funds  of  this  Academy  may  be  elected  a 
life  member  of  the  Academy,  free  of  assessment.  Non-resident  members 
may  be  elected  from  those  who  have  been  active  members  but  who  have 
removed  from  the  State.  In  any  case,  a  three-fourths  vote  of  the  mem- 
bers present  shall  elect  to  membership.     Application  for  membership  in 

(5) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


6  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

any  of  the  foregoing  classes  shall  be  referred  to  a  committee  on  appli- 
cation for  membership,  who  shall  consider  such  application  and  report 
to  the  Academy  before  the  election. 

Sec.  3.  The  members  who  are  actively  engaged  in  scientific  work, 
who  have  recognized  standing  as  scientific  men,  and  who  have  been  mem- 
bers of  the  Academy  at  least  one  year,  may  be  recommended  for  nom- 
ination for  election  as  fellows  by  three  fellows  or  members  personally 
acquainted  with  their  work  and  character.  Of  members  so  nominated  a 
number  not  exceeding  five  in  one  year  may,  on  recommendation  of  the 
Executive  Committee,  be  elected  as  fellows.  At  the  meeting  at  which 
this  is  adopted,  the  members  of  the  Executive  Committee  for  1894  and 
fifteen  others  shall  be  elected  fellows,  and  those  now  honorary  members 
shall  become  honorary  fellows.  Honorary  fellows  may  be  elected  on 
account  of  special  prominence  in  science,  on  the  written,  recommendation 
of  two  members  of  the  Academy.  In  any  case  a  three-fourths  vote  of 
the  members  present  shall  elect. 

•      ARTICLE  III. 

Section  1.  The  officers  of  this  Academy  shall  be  chosen  by  ballot  at 
the  annual  meeting,  and  shall  hold  office  one  year.  They  shall  consist  of 
a  President,  Vice-President,  Secretary,  Assistant  Secretary,  Press  Secre- 
tary, Editor,  and  Treasurer,  who  shall  perform  the  duties  usually  per- 
taining to  their  respective  offices  and  in  addition,  with  the  ex-Presidents 
of  the  Academy,  shall  constitute  an  Executive  Committee.  The  President 
shall,  at  each  annual  meeting,  appoint  two  members  to  be  a  committee 
which  shall  prepare  the  jkrograms  and  have  charge  of  the  arrangements 
for  all  meetings  for  one  year. 

Sec.  2.  The  annual  meeting  of  the  Academy  shall  be  held  in  the  city 
of  Indianapolis  within  the  week  following  Christmas  of  each  year,  unless 
otherwise  ordered  by  the  Executive  Committee.  There  shall  also  be  a 
summer  meeting  at  such  time  and  place  as  may  be  decided  upon  by  the 
Executive  Committee.  Other  meetings  may  be  called  at  the  discretion  of 
the  Executive  Committee.  The  past  Presidents,  together  with  the  officers 
and  Executive  Committee,  shall  constitute  the  council  of  the  Academy, 
and  represent  it  in  the  transaction  of  any  necessary  business  not  espe- 
cially provided  for  in  this  constitution,  in  the  interim  between  general 
meetings. 

Sec.  3.  This  constitution  may  be  altered  or  amended  at  any  annual 
meeting  by  a  three-fourths  majority  of  the  attending  members  of  at  least 
one  year's  standing.  No  question  of  amendment  shall  be  decided  on  the 
day  of  its  presentation. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


By-Laws. 
BY-LAWS. 


1.  On  motion,  any  special  department  of  science  shall  be  assigpied  to 
a  curator,  whose  duty  it  shall  be,  with  the  assistance  of  the  other  mem- 
bers interested  in  the  same  department,  to  endeavor  to  advance  knowl- 
edge in  that  particular  department.  Each  curator  shall  report  at  such 
time  and  place  as  the  Academy  shall  direct.  These  reports  shall  include 
a  brief  summary  of  the  progress  of  the  department  during  the  year 
preceding  the  presentation  of  the  report. 

2.  The  President  shall  deliver  a  public  address  on  the  morning  of 
one  of  the  days  of  the  meeting  at  the  expiration  of  his  term  of  office. 

3.  The  Press  Secretary  shall  attend  to  the  securing  of  proper  news- 
paper reports  of  the  meetings  and  assist  the  Secretary. 

4.  No  special  meeting  of  the  Academy  shall  be  held  without  a  notice 
of  the  same  having  been  sent  to  the  address  of  each  member  at  least 
fifteen  days  before  such  meeting. 

5.  No  bill  against  the  Academy  shall  be  paid  without  an  order  signed 
by  the  President  and  countersigned  by  the  Secretary. 

6.  Members  who  shall  allow  their  dues  to  remain  unpaid  for  two 
years,  having  been  annually  notified  of  their  arrearage  by  the  Treasurer, 
shall  have  their  names  stricken  from  the  roll. 

7.  Ten  members  shall  constitute  a  quorum  for  the  transaction  of 
business. 

8.  An  Editor  shall  be  elected  from  year  to  year.  His  duties  shall  be 
to  edit  the  annual  Proceedings.  No  allowance  shall  be  made  to  the  Editor 
for  clerical  assistance  on  account  of  any  one  edition  of  the  Proceedings 
in  excess  of  fifty  ($50)  dollars,  except  by  special  action  of  the  Executive 
Conmiittee.     (Amendment  passed  December  8,  1917.) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


8  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

AN    ACT    TO     PROVIDE     FOR    THE    PUBLICATION    OF     THE 

REPORTS  AND  PAPERS  OF  THE  INDIANA 

ACADEMY  OF  SCIENCE. 

(Approved  March  11,  1895.) 

Whereas,  The  Indiana  Academy  of  Science,  a  chartered  scientific 
association,  has  embodied  in  its  constitution  a  provision  that  it  will, 
upon  the  request  of  the  Governor,  or  of  the  several  departments  of  the 
State  government,  through  the  Governor,  and  through  its  council  as  an 
advisory  board,  assist  in  the  direction  and  execution  of  any  investigation 
within  its  province*  without  pecuniary  gain  to  the  Academy,  provided 
only  that  the  necessary  expenses  of  such  investigation  are  borne  by  the 
State;  and, 

Whereas,  The  reports  of  the  meetings  of  said  Academy,  with  the 
several  papers  read  before  it,  have  very  great  educational,  industrial 
and  economic  value,  and  should  be  preserved  in  permanent  form;  and. 

Whereas,  The  Constitution  of  the  State  makes  it  thie  duty  of  the 
General  Assembly  to  encourage  by  all  suitable  means  intellectual,  scien- 
tific and  agricultural  improvement;  therefore. 

Section  1.  Be  it  enacted  by  the  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Indiana,  That  hereafter  the  annual  reports  of  the  meetings  of  the 
Indiana  Academy  of  Science,  beginning  with  the  report  for  the  year 
1894,  including  all  papers  of  scientific  or  economic  value,  presented  at 
such  meetings,  after  they  shall  have  been  edited  and  prepared  for  pub- 
lication as  hereinafter  provided,  shall  be  published  by  and  under  the 
direction  of  the  Commissioners  of  Public  Printing  and  Binding. 

Sec.  2.  Said  reports  shall  be  edited  and  prepared  for  publication 
without  expense  to  the  State,  by  a  corps  of  editors  to  be  selected  and 
appointed  by  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Science,  who  shall  not,  by  reason 
of  such  service,  have  any  claim  against  the  State  for  compensation.  Th« 
form,  style  of  binding,  paper,  typography  and  manner  and  extent  of 
illustration  of  such  reports  shall  be  determined  by  the  editors,  subject 
to  the  approval  of  the  Commissioners  of  Public  Printing  and  Stationery. 
Not  less  than  1,500  nor  more  than  3,000  copies  of  each  of  said  reports 
shall  be  published,  the  size  of  the  edition  within  said  limits  to  be  deter- 
mined by  the  concurrent  action  of  the  editors  and  the  Commissioners  of 
Public  Printing  and  Stationery:  Provided,  That  not  to  exceed  six  hun- 
dred dollars  ($600)  shall  be  expended  for  such  publication  in  any  one 
year,  and  not  to  extend  beyond  1896:  Provided,  That  no  sums  shall  be 
deemed  to  be  appropriated  for  the  year  1894. 

Sec.  3.  All  except  three  hundred  copies  of  each  volume  of  said  re- 
ports shall  be  placed  in  the  custody  of  the  State  Librarian,  who  shall 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Public  Offenses.  9 

furnish  one  copy  thereof  to  each  public  library  in  the  State,  one  copy  to 
each  university,  college  or  normal  school  in  the  State,  one  copy  to  each 
high  school  in  the  State  having  a  library,  which  shall  make  application 
therefor,  and  one  copy  to  such  other  institutions,  societies  or  persons  as 
may  be  designated  by  the  Academy  through  its  editors  or  its  council. 
The  remaining  three  hundred  copies  shall  be  turned  over  to  the  Academy 
to  be  disposed  of  as  it  may  determine.  In  order  to  provide  for  the  pres- 
ervation of  the  same  it  shall  be  the  duty  of  the  Custodian  of  the  State 
House  to  provide  and  place  at  the  disposal  of  the  Academy  one  of  the 
unoccupied  rooms  of  the  State  House,  to  be  designated  as  the  office  of 
the  Academy  of  Science,  wherein  said  copies  of  said  reports  belonging 
to  the  Academy,  together  with  the  original  manuscripts,  drawings,  etc., 
thereof  can  be  safely  kept,  and  he  shall  also  equip  the  same  with  the 
necessary  shelving  and  furniture. 

Sec.  4.  An  emergency  is  hereby  declared  to  exist  for  the  immediate 
taking  effect  of  this  act,  and  it  shall  therefore  take  effect  and  be  in  force 
from  and  after  its  passage. 

PUBLIC  OFFENSES -HUNTING  WILD  BIRDS— PENALTY. 

(Approved  March  15,  1913.) 

Section  1.  Be  it  enacted  6y  the  General  Assembly  of  the  State  of 
Indiana,  That  section  six  (6)  of  the  above  entitled  act  be  amended  to 
read  as  follows:  Section  6.  That  section  six  hundred  two  (602)  of  the 
above  entitled  act  be  amended  to  read  as  follows:  Section  602.  It  shall 
be  unlawful  for  any  person  to  kill,  trap  or  possess  any  wild  bird,  or  to 
purchase  or  offer  the  same  for  sale,  or  to  destroy  the  nest  or  eggs  of  any 
wild  bird,  except  as  otherwise  provided  in  this  section.  But  this  section 
shall  not  apply  to  the  following  named  game  birds:  The  Anatidae,  com- 
monly called  swans,  geese,  brant,  river  and  sea  duck;  the  Rallidae,  com- 
monly known  as  rails,  coots,  mud-hens  and  gallinules;  the  Limicolae, 
commonly  known  as  shore  birds,  plovers,  surf  birds,  snipe,  woodcock, 
sandpipers,  tattlers  and  curlews;  the  Gallinae,  commonly  called  wild 
turkeys,  grouse,  prairie  chickens,  quails,  and  pheasants;  nor  to  English 
or  European  house  sparrows,  blackbirds,  crows,  hawks  or  other  birds  of 
prey.  Nor  shall  this  section  apply  to  any  person  taking  birds  or  their 
nests  or  eggs  for  scientific  purposes  under  permit  as  provided  in  the 
next  section.  Any  person  violating  the  provisions  of  this  section  shall, 
on  conviction,  be  fined  not  less  than  ten  dollars  ($10.00)  nor  more  than 
fifty  doUars  ($50.00). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


10  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

INDIANA  ACADEMY  OF  SCIENCE. 


Arthur,  J.  C, 
Bennett,  L.  F., 
BiGNEY,  A.  J., 
Blanchard,  W.  M., 
Blatchley,  W.  S., 
Branner,  J.  C, 
BuRRAGE,  Severance, 
Butler,  Amos  W., 
COGSHALL,  W..A., 
Coulter,  John  M., 
Coulter,  Stanley, 

CULBERTSON,  GLENN, 


Officers,  1919. 

President, 

E.  B.  Williamson. 

Vice-Presiden  t, 

Charles  Stoltz. 

Secretary, 

Howard  E.  Enders. 

Assistant  Secretary, 

Philip  A.  Tetrault. 

Press  Secretary, 

Frank  B.  Wade. 

Treasurer, 

William  M.  Blanchard. 

Editor, 

Lee  F.  Bennett. 


Executive  Committee: 
Dryer,  Chas.  R., 

ElGENMANN,  C.  H., 

Enders,  Howard  E., 
Evans,  P.  N., 
Foley,  A.  L., 
Hay,  O.  p., 
Hessler,  Robert, 
Jordan,  D.  S., 
McBeth,  W.  a., 
Mees,  Carl  L., 
Moenkhaus,  W.  J., 
MoTTiER,  David  M., 


Mendenhall,  T.  C, 
Naylor,  Joseph  P., 
Noyes,  W.  a., 
Stoltz,  Charles, 
Tetrault,  P.  A., 
Wade,  F.  B., 
Waldo,  C.  A., 
Wiley,  H.  W., 
Williamson,  E.  B., 
Wright,  John  S. 


Curators  : 

Botany J.  C.  Arthur. 

Entomology W.  S.  Blatchley. 

Herpetology   1 

Mammalogy     [ A.  W.  Butler. 

Ornithology  J 

Ichthyology C.  H.  Eigenmann. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Committees. 
Committees  Academy  op  Science,  1919. 


11 


Program. 

C.  C.  Beam,  Bluffton. 

Frank  B.  Wade,  Shortridge  High 

School,  Indianapolis. 
John  S.  Wright,  Indianapolis. 

Nominations. 

Stanley  Coulter,  Lafayette. 
W.  J.  MoENKHAUS,  Bloomington. 
J.  P.  Naylor,  Greencastle. 

State  Library. 

W.  S.  Blatchley,  1558  Park  Ave., 

Indianapolis. 
A.  L.  Foley,  Bloomington. 
Amos    W.    Butler,    State    House, 

Indianapolis. 

Biological  Survey. 

Herbert  S.  Jackson,  Agricultural 
Experiment  Station,  West  La- 
fayette. 

Richard  M.  Holman,  Crawfords- 
ville. 

M.  S.  Markle,  Richmond. 

Will  Scott,  Indiana  University, 
Bloomington. 

Distribution  of  Proceedings. 

Howard  E.  Enders,  West  Lafay- 
ette. 

Wm.  M.  Blanchard,  Greencastle. 

U.  O^  Cox,  State  Nonnal,  Terre 
Haute. 

George  Osner,  West  Lafayette. 


Membership. 

F.  M.  Andrews,  Bloomington. 
M.  L.  Fisher,  West  Lafayette. 
Mason  L.  Weems,  Valparaiso. 

Auditing. 

Glenn  Culbertson,  Hanover. 
ROLLO  Ramsey,  Bloomington. 

Relation  of  the  Academy  to  the 
State. 

R.  W.  McBride,  1239  State  Life 
Building,  Indianapolis. 

Glenn  Culbertson,  Hanover. 

H.  E.  Barnard,  State  House,  Indi- 
anapolis. 

John  S.  Wright,  3718  Pennsyl- 
vania St.,  Indianapolis. 

W.  W.  Woollen,  1628  Pennsyl- 
vania St.,  Indianapolis. 

Publication  of  Proceedings. 

Lee  F.  Bennett,  Janesville,  Wis. 
Robert  Hessler,  Logansport. 
George  N.  Hopper,  West  Lafayette. 
R.  R.  Hyde,  Terre  Haute. 
James  Brown,  5372  E.  Washington 
St.,  Indianapolis. 

Advisory  Council. 

John  S.  Wright. 
R.  W.  McBru)e. 
Glenn  Culbertson. 
Stanley  Coulter. 
Wilbur  Cogshall. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


12 


Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


saasssd  6 


._  c  c  cs  ^ri  d  as 
o  c;  o  V  V  od  >- 
-  •-&  i-a  i-»  i-»  i-a  J> 


Pt^  Qh  p4  P^  p4  &<  -<J 
6666660 


03 


q   q    q   q*©   S'S'oj'aScQCQCQ 

GQ  GQ  GO  C»    «    C    O  ^    O  S  S  ^, 

^.  ^  ^  ^  H  H  H  H  H  *1  "**;  '^. 


o 

O 

CO 

o 

Q 

-»: 
o 

< 
1-1 

O 

1-1 

W 
H 

O 

W 
O 

o 


m 

CO 


§   § 


qqqqq^4^^ 

pQpQnqQCQ-^.o.c 
,fl  ,fi  ,fi 


0000 


00 


6  <  ^  < 

0)    U    0)      .      .      . 

O  c5  O  O  O  O 


a; 


CO 


1^  c  a 

^    o3    5 

o   fe   C   o   «   ^ 


-  „  „  ^  ^       «5  «^ 


• « 

ACQ 
§§ 

00      00 

d 


s 


6  B 

o  o 

s  i 

08  S 


CO 


Ih      l>«      l>«      l>«      Ih 

<U     <U     fl?     C^     O     CJ     o 


3     3 

n  p; 


3    3 


333 

PQ  PQ  PQ 


QC   &0   M)   60   bC   60   bClSb   bO   M>^ 


S  g 


O    O 


goo 

III 


3        O  ._i  .^  .^  ._.  .^  ._-  .„  .^  .„ 
PQ       '^^uUUt^UUUh^ 

"*    ''woooaoocdcQtnaiaJ 


o 


'/: 

H 

53 
p: 

Oh 


^^     3     3     C 


.  ^  •-&  PQ 

o     .  o 

^   1-3    H5 


0!    g 

d  ^ 


S   ^^«  xS^wOF  >.PQS^ 


^;« 


S:<xHddQSW^d 


CO 

00 


Q000000000«00' 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Officers. 


13 


tj  -d  13  ^p  'p 

i  i  i 

i.lM^^^ 

cBeth 
cBeth 
cBeth 
cBeth 

|||||)PQ»PQPQPQ 

^^^:^ 

SSSS^SpqSSS 

<<<  < 

•-5  "-i  •-& 

i  1  a  a  a  a  a 

^^^^^^^ 

lark.  . 

dhams 

rt 

rt.  ... 

r>    -IJ    -^    -M 
V^    .«d    ^    ^ 

O    08    oS 

^  ja  Xi  Xi 

i  3  5 

5^  QQ  CQ 

^666666 

■s  ■§ -S 1  "S  "S  ■§ 

o<<<^\ji^ 

^^^^^^^ 

^<<< 

d   o   o 
-S  S  ^ 

CQ  CQ  CQ  CQ  CQ  OQ  PQ 

oddd 

^S.S 

Ph  P£4  fo  Pe4  Pl,  Pl,  Ph 

:   d'   d 

:  £  2    :    :    :    : 

.   a>   Q}   d 

.    P    o 

1  i  1 1 1^1 

•     d     d     S    -fa    ^   <4J 

•|  W  H  3  5  J3  i 

w  tf  3  S  S  ^  ^ 

"'■S'S^^^^ 

ww^^ 

i-d  PQ  PQ 

s  1  i«-.i  -<  ^ 

•-^•-;<5<i<iwwdwwwPH'ti^PL^ 

c  d 

•    GO    <a    oD    <a 

a;    S     •     - 

:  S  S  S  fe 

3     3'* 

d 

llg§ 

s  >»  >^ 

>.  >.  s^'*'  WWW 

ss  1 1 

«ll 

lllwwww 

a  cQ  S  (i 

^'  a  s  s  s  s  1 1 1 1 
s 1 ^  i  i  i  1 1 II 

J^h:!':: 

o<ti<;<{<<jwwww 

2  ^ 


08  Si 


.1§l 


-31 


I  PQ 


^2i 


O  -<  A^  d  H^  P  OT 


03 


±i  ►-a  ^ 


d   d. 

o  o 

GO      CR 

gi 


PQ  CQ 


f—l.—li—(*-l*-l*-l«— !»-<«— 105 

O)   Od   Od   03   Od   O)    Oi    Oi   03    ^H 


O)   O)   O)   O)    O)    03    OS    03    ^~* 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


14  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

MEMBERS.* 


FELLOWS, 

Andrews,  F.  M.,  901  E.  10th  St.,  Bloomington fl^ll 

Associate  Professor  of  Botany,  Indiana  University. 

Plant  Physiology,  Botany. 
Arthur,  Joseph  C,  915  Columbia  St.,  Lafayette 1893 

Professor  Emeritus  of  Botany,  Purdue  University. 

Botany. 
Badertscher,  J.  A.,  312  ,  S.  Fess  Ave.,  Bloomington 1917 

Professor  of  Anatomy,  Indiana  University. 

Anatomy. 
Beede,  Joshua  W.,  404  W.  38th  St.,  Austin,  Texas. 1906 

Bureau   of    Economic   Geology   and    Technology,   University  of 
Texas. 

Geology. 
Behrens,  Charles  A.,  217  Lutz  Ave.,  West  Lafayette 1917 

Professor  of  Bacteriology,  Purdue  University. 

Bacteriology. 
Bennett,  Lee  F.,  Janesville,  Wis 1916 

With  The  H.  W.  Gossard  Company. 

Geology,  Zoology 
Benton,  George  W.,  100  Washington  Square,  New  York,  N.  Y 1896 

Editor  in  Chief,  American  Book  Company. 
Big^iey*  Andrew  J.,  Syracuse,  N.  Y 1897 

Professor  of  Physiology,  Syracuse  University. 
Blanchard,  William  M.,  1008  S.  College  Ave.,  Greencastle,  Ind 1914 

Professor  of  Chemistry,  DePauw  University,  Greencastle,  Ind. 

Organic  Chemistry. 
Blatchley,  W.  S.,  1558  Park  Ave.,  Indianapolis 1893 

Naturalist. 

Botany,  Entomology,  and  Geology. 

*  Every  effort  has  been  made  to  obtain  the  correct  address  and  occupation  of  each 
member,  and  to  learn  in  what  line  of  science  he  is  interested.  The  first  line  contains 
the  name  and  address :  the  second  line  the  occupation ;  the  third  line  the  branch  of 
science  in  which  he  is  interested.  The  omission  of  an  address  indicates  that  mail  «<^ 
dressed  to  the  last  printed  address  was  returned  as  uncalled  for.  Infonnation  as  to  the 
present  address  of  members  so  indicated  is  requested  by  the  secretary.  The  cuttrnn  of 
dividing  the  list  of  members  has  been  followed. 

t  Date  of  election. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Fellows.  15 

Breeze,  Fred  J.,  Muncie 1910 

Branch  State  Normal  School. 

Geography. 
Bruner,  Henry  Lane,  324  S.  Ritter  Ave.,  Indianapolis 1899 

Professor  of  Biologry,  Butler  College. 

Comparative  Anatomy,  Zoology. 
Bryan,  William  Lowe,  Bloomington 1914 

President  Indiana  University. 

Psychology. 
Butler,  Amos  W.,  52  Downey  Ave.,  Irvington 1893 

Secretary,  Indiana  Board  of  State  Charities. 

Vertebrate  Zoology,  Anthropology,  Sociology. 
Cogshall,  Wilbur  A.,  423  S.  Fess  Ave.,  Bloomington 1906 

Associate  Professor  of  Astronomy,  Indiana  University. 

Astronomy. 
Coulter,  Stanley,  213  S.  Ninth  St.,  Lafayette 1893 

Dean  School  of  Science,  Purdue  University. 

Botany,  Forestry. 
Cox,  Ulysses  O.,  P.  O.  Box  81,  Terre  Haute 1908 

Head  Department  Zoology  and  Botany,  Indiana  State  Normal. 

Botany,  Zoology. 
Culbertson,  Glenn,  Hanover 1899 

Chair  Geologry)  Physics  and  Astronomy,  Hanover  College. 

Geology. 
Cumings,  Edgar  Roscoe,  327  E.  Second  St.,  Bloomington 1906 

Professor  of  Geology,  Indiana  University. 

Geology,  Paleontology. 
Deam,  Charles  C,  Bluffton 1910 

Drugg:ist,  Botanist,  State  Forester. 

Botany. 
Dryer,  Charles  R.,  Oak  Knoll,  Fort  Wayne 1897 

Geography. 
Dutcher,  J.  B.,  1212  Atwater  St.,  Bloomington 1914 

Associate  Professor  of  Physics,  Indiana  University. 

Physics. 
Eigenmann,  Carl  H.,  630  Atwater  St.,  Bloomington 1893 

Professor  of  Zoology,  Dean  of  Graduate  School,  Indiana  Uni- 
versity. 

Embryology,  Degeneration,  Heredity,  Evolution  and  Distribution 
of  American  Fish. 
Enders,  Howard  Edwin,  107  Fowler  Ave.,  Lafayette 1912 

Professor  of  Zoology,  Purdue  University. 

Zoology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


16  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Evans,  Percy  Norton,  302  Waldron  St.,  West  Lafayette 1901 

Director  of  Chemical  Laboratory,  Purdue  University. 

Chemistry. 
Foley,  Arthur  L.,  Blooming^ton 1897 

Head  of  Department  of  Physics,  Indiana  University. 

Physics. 
Hessler,  Robert,  Logansport 1899 

Physician. 

Biology. 
Hoffer,  George  N.,  Littleton  St.,  West  Lafayette 1913 

Federal  Agent,  Purdue  University  Experiment  Station. 
Hufford,  Mason  E.,  Bloomington 1916 

Physics. 
Hurty,  J.  N.,  Indianapolis 1910 

Secretary,  Indiana  State  Board  of  Health. 

Hygiene  and  Chemistry.' 
Hyde,  Roscoe  Raymond,  636  Chestnut  St.,  Terre  Haute 1909 

Assistant    Professor    Physiology    and    Zoology,    Indiana    State 
Normal. 

Zoology,  Physiology,  Bacteriology. 
Kenyon,  Alfred  Monroe,  315  University  St.,  West  Lafayette 1914 

Professor  of  Mathematics,  Purdue  University. 

Mathematics. 
Kern,  Frank  D.,  State  College,  Pa 1912 

Professor  of  Botany,  Pennsylvania  State  College. 

Botany. 
Koch,  Edward  W.,  Buffalo,  N.  Y 1917 

Care  of  University  of  Buffalo  Medical  School. 

Pharmacology. 
Logan,  Wm.  N.,  924  Atwater  St.,  Bloomington 1917 

Professor  of  Economic  Geology,  Indiana  University. 

State  Geologist. 
McBride,  Robert  W.,  1239  State  Life  Building,  Indianapolis 1916 

Lawyer. 
Middleton,  A.  R.,  629  University  St.,  West  Lafayette 1908 

Professor  of  Chemistry,  Purdue  University. 

Chemistry. 
Morrison,  Edwin,  80  S.  W.  Seventh  St.,  Richmond 1915 

Professor  of  Physics,  Earlham  College. 

Physics  and  Chemistry. 
Mottier,  David  M.,  215  Forest  Place,  Bloomington 1893 

Professor  of  Botany,  Indiana  University. 

Morphology,  Cytology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Fellows.  17 

Naylor,  J.  P.,  Greencastle 1903 

Professor  of  Physics,  DePauw  University. 

Physics,  Mathematics. 
Nieuwland,  J.  A 1914 

Notre  Dame  University. 

Botany  and  Organic  Chemistry. 
Payne,  F.,  620  S.  Fess  Ave.,  Bloomingrton 1916 

Associate  Professor  of  Zoology,  Indiana  University. 

Cytology  and  Embryology. 
Po^lman,  Augustus  G.,  16  Yale  Ave.,  University  City,  St.  Louis,  Mo..  1911 

Professor  of  Anatomy. 

Embryology,  Comparative  Anatomy. 
Ramsey,  Rolla  R.,  615  E.  Third  St.,  Bloomington 1906 

Associate  Professor  of  Physics,  Indiana  University. 

Physics. 
Ransom,  James  H.,  2015  West  End  Ave.,  Nashville,  Tenn 1902 

Professor  of  Chemistry,  Vanderbilt  University. 

General  Chemistry,  Organic  Chemistry. 
Rettger,  Louis  J.,  31  Gilbert  Ave.,  Terre  Haute 1896 

Professor  of  Physiology,  Indiana  State  Normal. 

Animal  Physiolo^. 
Rothrock,  David  A.,  Bloomington 1906 

Professor  of  Mathematics,  Indiana  University. 

Mathematics.  . 
Schockel,  Barnard,  Terre  Haute 1917 

Professor  of  Physical  Geography,  State  Normal  School. 
Scott,  Will,  Bloomington 1911 

Assistant  Professor  of  Zoology,  Indiana  University. 

Zoology,  Lake  Problems. 
Shannon,  Charles  W.,  518  Lahoma  Ave.,  Norman,  Okla 1912 

With  Oklahoma  State  Geological  Survey. 

Geology. 
Smith,  Albert,  University  St.,  West  Lafayette  (Army  Service) 1908 

Professor  of  Structural  Engineering. 

Physics,  Mechanics. 
Smith,  Charles  Marquis,  152  Sheetz  St.,  West  Lafayette 1912 

Professor  of  Physics,  Purdue  University. 

Physics. 
Stone,  Winthrop  E.,  Lafayette 1893 

President  of  Purdue  University. 

Chemistry. 

2—16668 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


18  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Van  Hook,  James  M.,  939  N.  College  Ave.,  Bloomington 1911 

Assistant  Professor  of  Botany,  Indiana  University. 

Botany. 
Wade,  Frank  Bertram,  1039  W.  Twenty-seventh  St.,  Indianapolis. .  .1914 

Head  of  Chemistry  Department,  Shortridge  High  School. 

Chemistry,  Physics,  Geology,  and  Mineralogy. 
Williamson,  E.  B.,  Bluffton 1914 

President,  The  Wells  County  Bank.. 

Dragonflies. 
Woollen,  William  Watson,  Indianapolis 1908 

Lawyer. 

Birds  and  Nature  Study. 
Wright,  John  S.,  3718  N.  Pennsylvania  St.,  Indianapolis 1894 

Manager  of  Advertising  Department,  Eli  Lilly  Co. 

Economic  Botany. 


NON-RESIDENT  MEMBERS  AND  FELLOWS, 

Abbott,  G.  A.,  Grand  Forks,  N.  Dak.,  Fellow 1908 

Professor  of  Chemistry,  University  of  North  Dakota. 

Chemistry. 
Aldrich,  John  Merton,  Washington,  D.  C 1918 

Custodian  of  Diptera,  U.  S.  National  Museum. 

Dipterologist. 
Aley,  Robert  J.,  Orono,  Me.,  Fellow 1908 

President  of  University  of  Maine. 

Mathematics  and  General  Science. 
Branner,  John  Casper,  Stanford  University,  California. 

President  Emeritus  of  Stanford  University. 

Geology. 
Brannon,  Melvin  A.,  President  Beloit  College,  Beloit,  Wis. 

Plant  Breeding,  Botany. 
Burrage,  Severance,  Denver,  Colo 1898 

United  States  Public  Health  Work. 
Campbell,  D.  H.,  Stanford  University,  California. 

Professor  of  Botany,  Stanford  University. 

Botany. 
Clark,  Howard  Walton,  U.  S.  Biological  Station,  Fairport,  Iowa. 

Scientific  Assistant  U.  S.  Bureau  of  Fisheries. 

Botany,  Zoology. 
Cook,  Mel  T.,  New  Brunswick,  N.  J.,  Fellow 1902 

Plant  Pathologist,  •  New  Jersey  Experiment  Station. 

Botany,  Plant  Pathology,  Entomology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Non-Resident  Members  and  Fellows.  19 

Coulter,  John  M.,  University  of  Chicasfo,  Chicasfo,  111.,  Fellow 1893 

Head  Department  of  Botany,  Chicagfo  University. 

Botany. 
Davis,  B.  M.,  Oxford,  Ohio. 

Professor  of  Agricultural  Education. 

Miami  University. 
Duff,  A.  Wilmer,  43  Harvard  St.,  Worcester,  Mass. 

Professor  of  Physics,  Worcester  Polytechnic  Institute. 

Physics. 
Evermann,  Barton  Warren,  Director  Museum. 

California  Academy  of  Science,  Golden  Gate  Park,  San  Fran- 
cisco, Cal. 

Zoology. 
Gilbert,  Charles  H.,  Stanford  University,  California. 

Professor  of  Zoology,  Stanford  University. 

Ichthyology. 
Goss,  William  Freeman  M.,  61  Broadway,  New  York,  Fellow 1893 

President  The  Railway  Car  Manufacturers  Association. 
Greene,  Charles  Wilson,  814  Virginia  Ave.,  Columbia,  Mo. 

Professor  of  Physiology  and  Pharmacology,  University  of  Mis- 
souri. 

Physiology,  Zoology. 
Hargitt,  Chas.  W.,  909  Walnut  Ave.,  Syracuse,  N.  Y. 

Professor  of  Zoology  and  Director  of  the  Laboratories,  Syracuse 
University. 

Hygiene,  Embryology,  Eugenics,  Animal  Behavior. 
Hay,  Oliver  Perry,  U.  S.  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Research  Associate,  Carnegie  Institute  of  Washington. 

Vertebrate  Paleontology,  especially  that  of  the  Pleistocene  Epoch. 
Huston,  H.  A.,  New  York  City,  Fellow 1893 

Secretary,  German  Kali  Works. 
Jenkins,  Oliver  P.,  Stanford  University,  California. 

Professor  of  Physiology,  Stanford  University. 

Physiology,  Histology. 
Jordan,  David  Starr,  Stanford  University,  California. 

Chancellor  Emeritus  of  Stanford  University. 

Fish,  Eugenics,  Botany,  Evolution. 
Kingsley,  J.  S.,  University  of  Illinois,  Urbana,  111. 

Professor  of  Zoologry. 

Zoology. 
KleinSmid  von,  R.  B.,  President  University  of  Arizona,  Tucson,  Ariz. 
Knipp,  Charles  T.,  915  W.  Nevada  St.,  Urbana,  111. 

Professor  of  Experimental  Physics,  University  of  Illinois. 

Physics,  Discharge  of  Electricity  Through  Gases. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


20  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Marsters,  V.  F.,  Kansas  City,  Mo.,  care  of  C.  N.  Gould,  Fellow 1893 

Geologist. 
McDougal,  Daniel  Trembly,  Tucson,  Ariz. 

Director,  Department  of  Botanical  Research,  Carnegie  Institute, 
Washington,  D.  C. 

Botany. 
McMuUen,  Lynn  Banks,  State  Normal  School,  Valley  City,  N.  D. 

Head    Science    Department   and    Vice-President    State    Normal 
School. 

Physics,  Chemistry. 
Mendenhall,  Thomas  Corwin,  Ravenna,  O. 

Retired. 

Physics,  "Engineering,"  Mathematics,  Astronomy. 
Miller,  John  Anthony,  Swarthmore,  Pa.,  Fellow 1904 

Professor  of  Mathematics  and  Astronomy,  Swarthmore  College. 

Astronomy,  Mathematics. 
Moore,  George  T.,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Director  Missouri  Botanical  Garden. 

Botany. 
Noyes,  William  Albert,  Urbana,  111.,  Fellow 1893 

Director  of  Chemical  Laboratory,  University  of  Illinois. 

Chemistry. 
Reagan,  A.  B. 

Superintendent  Deer  Creek  Indian  School,  Ibopah,  Utah. 

Geology,  Paleontology,  Ethnology. 
Smith,  Alexander,  care  Columbia  University,  New  York,  Fellow 1893 

Head  of  Department  of  Chemistry,  Columbia  University. 

Chemistry. 
Springer,  Alfred,  312  E.  Second  St.,  Cincinnati,  O. 

Chemist. 

Chemistry. 
Swain,  Joseph,  Swarthmore,  Pa.,  Fellow : 1898 

President  of  Swarthmore  College. 

Science  of  Administration. 
Waldo,  Clarence  A.,  401  W.  18th  St.,  New  York  City 1893 

Mathematics,  Mechanics,  Geology  and  Mineralogy. 
Wiley,  Harvey  W.,  Cosmos  Club,  Washington,  D.  C,  Fellow 1895 

Professor  of  Agricultural  Chemistry,  George  Washington  Uni- 
versity. 

Biolog:ical  and  Agricultural  Chemistry. 
Zeleny,  Chas.,  1003  W.  Illinois  St.,  Urbana,  111. 

Professor  of  Experimental  Zoology. 

Zoology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Active  Members.  21 

ACTIVE  MEMBERS. 

Acre,  Harlan  Q./  Denison,  O. 

Botany. 
Allen,  William  Ray,  212  S.  Washington  St.,  Bloomingrton. 

Zoology,  Indiana  University. 
Allison,  Luna  E.,  435  Wood  St.,  Lafayette. 

Care  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 

Botany. 
Anderson,  Flora  Charlotte,  Route  No.  5,  Crawfordsville. 

Botany. 
Atkinson,  F.  C,  2534  Broadway,  Indianapolis. 

Chemistry,  American  Hominy  Company. 
Baker,  William  Franklin,  Indianapolis,  care  St.  Vincent's  Hospital. 

Medicine,  Roentgenology,  Pathology. 
Bamhill,  Dr.  T.  F.,  Indianapolis. 

Professor  of  Surgery,  Indiana  University  School  of  Medicine. 
Barr,  Harry  L.,  Stockland,  111. 

Botany  and  Physics. 
Bates,  W.  H.,  403  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Associate  Professor  of  Mathematics,  Purdue  University. 

Mathematics. 
Beals,  Colonzo  C,  103  Russell  St.,  Hammond. 

Botany. 
Berteling,  John  B.,  228  W.  Colfax  Ave.,  South  Bend. 

Medicine. 
Binford,  Raymond,  Guilford,  N.  C. 

President  of  Guilford  College. 

Zoology. 
Bishop,  Harry  Eldridge,  551  E.  40th  St.,  Indianapolis. 

Food  Chemist,  Indiana  State  Board  of  Health. 
Black,  Homer  F.,  2719-2721  Michigan  Ave.,  Chicago,  III. 

Professor  of  Mathematics,  Chicago  Technical  College. 

Mathematics. 
Bliss,  G.  S.,  Fort  Wayne. 

Medicine,  State  School  for  Feeble  Minded. 
Blose,  Joseph,  Spiceland. 

Physics. 
Bond,  Charles  S.,  112  N.  Tenth  St.,  Richmond. 

Physician. 

Biology,  Bacteriologry,  Physical  Diagnosis  and  Photomicrography. 
Bond,  Dr.  George  S.,  Indianapolis. 

Professor  of  Medicine,  Indiana  University  School  of  Medicine. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


22  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Bonns,  Walter  W.,  Indianapolis,  care  of  Eli  Lilly  &  Co. 

Plant  Physiology. 

Director  of  Botanical  Department. 
Bourke,  A.  Adolphus,  2304  Liberty  Ave.,  Terre  Haute. 

Instructor,  Physics,  Zoology,  and  Geography. 

Botany,  Physics. 
Brossman,  Charles,  1503  Merchants  Bank  Bldg.,  Indianapolis. 

Consulting  Engineer. 

Water  Supply,  Sewage  Disposal,  Sanitary  Engineering. 
Bruce,  Edwin  M.,  2401  N.  Ninth  St.,  Terre  Haute. 

Professor  of  Chemistry,  Indiana  State  Normal. 

Chemistry. 
Bybee,  Halbert  P.,  University  Station,  Austin,  Texas. 

Adjunct  Professor  of  Geology,  University  of  Texas. 
Canis,  Edward  N.,  Route  A-2,  Box  372-A,  Indianapolis. 

Nature  Study. 
Caparo,  Jose  Angel,  Notre  Dame. 

Professor  of  Physics  and  Mathematics,  Notre  Dame  University. 

Mathematics,  Physics  and  Electrical  Engineering. 
Carr,  Ralph  Howard,  27  N.  Salisbury  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Professor  of  Agricultural  Chemistry,  Purdue. 
Carter,  Edgar  B.,  2615  Ashland  St.,  Indianapolis. 

Director  of  Scientific  Work,  Swan-Myers  Coiiipany. 

Chemistry  and  Bacteriology. 
Chandler,  Elias  J.,  Bicknell. 

Farmer. 

Ornithology  and  Mammals. 
Chapman,  Edgar  K.,  506  S.  Grant  St.,  Crawfordsville. 

Professor  of  Physics,  Wabash  College. 
Clark,  Jediah  H.,  126  E.  Fourth  St.,  Connersville. 

Physician. 

Medicine. 
Cloud,  J.  H.,  608  E.  Main  St.,  Valparaiso,  Ind. 

Professor  of  Physics,  Valparaiso  University. 

Physics. 
Collins,  Anna  Mary,  5248  Kensington  Ave.,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Zoology. 
Collins,  Jacob  Roland,  711  Vine  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Instructor  in  Physics,  Purdue  University. 
Conner,  S.  D.,  204  S.  Ninth  St.,  Lafayette. 

Chemistry,  Experiment  Station. 
Coryell,  Horace  N.,  New  York  City. 

Columbia  University. 

Geology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Active  Members.  23 

Cromwell,  Hobart,  Salem,  Ind. 

Zoology. 
Cullison,  Aline,  East  Chicago,  Ind.,  Box  404. 

Instructor,  Botany,  in  East  Chicago  High  School. 
Daniels,  Lorenzo  E.,  Rolling  Prairie. 

Retired  Farmer. 

Conchology. 
Dean,  John  C,  University  Club,  Indianapolis. 

Astronomy. 
Denny,  Martha  L.,  Manhattan,  Kan. 

Kansas  Agricultural  College. 

Zoology.  « 

Deppe,  C.  A.,  Franklin. 

Franklin  College. 
Dietz,  Harry  F.,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Federal  Horticultural  Board. 

Entomology. 
Doan,  Martha,  Richmond. 

Professor  of  Chemistry,  Earlham. 
Dolan,  Jos.  P.,  Syracuse. 
Douglas,  Benjamin  W.,  Trevlac. 

Fruit  Culture. 
Downhour,  D.  Elizabeth,  2307  Talbott  Ave.,  Indianapolis. 

Zoology  and  Botany,  Teachers  College. 
Driver,  Chas.  C,  808  Atwater  Ave.,  Bloomington. 

Graduate  Student  in  Zoology,  Indiana  University. 
DuBois,  Henry  M.,  1408  Washington  Ave.,  LaGrande,  Ore. 

Paleontology  and  Ecology. 
Dukes,  Richard  G.,  Comer  Seventh  and  Russell  Sts.,  West  Lafayette, 
Purdue  University. 

Engineering. 
Earp,  Samuel  E.,  643  Occidental  Bldg.,  Indianapolis. 

Physician. 

Medicine. 
Edmonson,  Clarence  E.,  822  Atwater  St.,  Bloomington. 

Graduate  Student,  Physiology,  Indiana  University. 

Physiology. 
Emerson,  Charles  P.,  602  Huhie-Mansur  Bldg.,  Indianapolis. 

Dean  Indiana  University  Medical  College. 

Medicine. 
Epple,  Wm.  F.,  311  Sylvia  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Assistant  in   Dairy   Chemistry,    Experiment    Station,   Purdue   Uni- 
versity. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


24  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Estabrook,  Arthur  H.,  219  E.  17th  St.,  Indianapolis. 

Genetics,  with  State  Board  of  Charities. 
Evans,  Samuel  G.,  1452  Upper  Second  St.,  Evansville. 

Merchant. 

Botany,  Ornithology. 
Felver,  William  P.,  325%  Market  St.,  Logansport. 

Railroad  Clerk. 

Geology,  Chemistry. 
Fisher,  Homer  Glenn,  Johns  Hopkins  Medical  School,  Baltimore,  Md. 

Student  in  Medicine. 
Fisher,  L.  W.,  Rossville. 

Zoology. 
Fisher,  Martin  L.,  Lafayette. 

Professor  of  Crop  Production,  Purdue  University. 

Agriculture,  Soils,  Crops,  Birds,  Botany. 
Foresman,  George  Kedzie,  110  S.  Ninth  St.,  Lafayette. 

Instructor  in  Chemistry,  Purdue  University. 
Fuller,  Frederic  D.,  4520  W.  28th  St.,  Bryan,  Texas. 

Experiment  Station. 

Chemistry,  Nutrition. 
Funk,  Austin,  519  E.  Ninth  St,  New  Albany. 

Physician. 

Diseases  of  Eye,  Ear,  Nose  and  Throat. 
Galloway,  Jesse  James,  Geology  Department,  Columbia  University,  New 
York  City. 

Geology,  Paleontology. 
Gatch,  Willis  D.,  Indianapolis,  Indiana  University  Medical  School. 

Professor  of  Surgery. 
Gates,  Florence  A.,  3435  Detroit  Ave.,  Toledo,  O. 

Teacher  of  Botany. 

Botany  and  Zoology. 
Gidley,  William,  250  Hillside  Ave.,  Jamaica,  N.  Y. 

Pharmacy,  with  E.  R.  Squibb  &  Sons,  New  York. 
Gillum,  Robert  G.,  Terre  Haute. 

State  Normal  School. 
Gingery,  Walter  G.,  Shortridge  High  School,  Indianapolis. 

Mathematics. 
Glenn,  Earl  R.,  New  York  City. 

The  Lincoln  School  of  Teachers  College,  Columbia  University. 

Physics. 
Goldsmith,  William  Morton,  Gunnison,  Colo. 

Colorado  State  Normal  School. 

Biology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Active  Members.  25 

Gj;B,y,  Harold,  2813  Ruckle  St.,  Indianapolis. 

Research  Chemist,  Eli  X^illy  &  Co. 

Chemistry. 
Greene,  Frank  C,  30  N.  Yorktown  St.,  Tulsa,  Okla. 

Geology. 
Hadley,  Murray  N.,  608  Hume-Mansur  Bldg.,  Indianapolis. 

Physician. 

Surgery. 
Hanna,  U.  S.,  Bloomington. 

Professor  of  Mathematics. 
Hansford,  Hazel  Irene,  710  S..  Fess  Ave.,  Bloomington. 

Graduate  Student  in  Botany,  Indiana  University. 
Happ,  William,  South  Bend. 

Botany. 
Harding,  C.  Francis,  503  University  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Head  of  Electrical  Engineering,  Purdue  University. 
Harman,  Paul  M.,  314  N.  Dunn  St.,  Bloomington. 

Physiology. 
Heimburger,  Harry  V.,  St.  Paul,  Minn. 

Instructor  in  Biology  in  Hamline  University. 
Heimlich,  Louis  Frederick,  495  Littleton  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Instructor  in  Botany,  Purdue  University. 
Henmier,  Edwin  John,  Somerville. 

Botany. 
Hendricks,  Victor  K.,  1273  Railway  Exchange  Bldg.,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Assistant  Chief  Engineer,  St.  L.  &  S.  F.,  Mo.,  Kan.  &  Texas;  Mo., 
Okla.  &  Gulf  Railroads. 

Civil  Engineering  and  Wood  Preservation. 
Hess,  Walter  E.,  Greencastle. 

Professor  of  Biology,  DePauw  University. 
Hetherington,  John  P.,  417  Fourth  St.,  Logansport. 

Physician. 

Medicine,  Surgery,  X-Ray,  Electro-Therapeutics. 
Hinman,  Jack  J.,  Jr.,  State  University,  Iowa  City,  Iowa. 

Senior   Water   Bacteriologrist   and   Chemist,   Laboratories   for   State 
Board  of  Health. 

Chemistry  and  Biology. 
Hoffman,   George   L.,   care   of  Western   Pennsylvania   Hospital,   Pitts- 
burgh, Pa. 

Bacteriology,  Serology. 
Hole,  Allen  D.,  615  National  Road,  Richmond. 

Professor  Earlham  College. 

Geology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


26  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Holman,  Richard  M.,  Crawfordsville. 

Professor  of  Botany,  Wabash  College. 
Houseman,  H.  V.,  300  S.  Bradford  St.,  Platteville,  Wis. 

Chemistry  and  Physics. 
Huber,  Leonard  L.,  Hanover. 

Hanover  College. 

Chemistry  and  Biology. 
Huchinson,  Emory,  Norman  Station,  Ind. 

Zoology. 
Hutton,  Joseph  Gladden,  Brookings,  S.  Dak. 

Associate  Professor  of  Agronomy,  State  College. 

Agronomy  and  Earth  Science. 
Hyslop,  George,  65  Nagle  St.,  New  York  City. 

Cornell  Medical  School. 
Irving,  Thos.  P.,  Notre  Dame. 

Physics. 
Jackson,  Herbert  Spencer,  940  Seventh  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Botany,  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 
Jackson,  Thos.  F.,  Carter  Oil  Co.,  Tulsa,  Okla. 

(jreology. 
Jacobson,  Moses  A.,  West  Lafayette,  care  of  Teknion  House. 

Instructor  in  Bacteriology,  Purdue  University. 
Jopling,  John  C,  421  Emerson  St.,  Princeton. 

Chemist. 
Jordan,  Charles  Bernard,  West  Lafayette. 

Director  School  of  Pharmacy,  Purdue  University. 
Kaczmarek,  Regidius  M.,  Notre  Dame. 

Professor  of  Biology  and  Bacteriology. 
Knotts,  Armenis  F.,  800  Jackson  St.,  Gary. 

Nature  Study. 
Kohl,  Edwin  J.,  105  Salisbury  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Biology,  Purdue  University. 
Lee,  C.  0.,  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Pharmacy,  Purdue  University. 
Liston,  Jesse  G.,  R.  F.  D.  No.  2,  Lewis. 

High  School  Teacher. 

(jreology. 
Ludwig,  C.  A.,  R.  R.  1,  Brookville. 

Agriculture,  Botany. 
Ludy,  L.  v.,  600  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Professor  Experimental  Engineering,  Purdue  University. 

Experimental  Engineering  in  Steam  and  Gas. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Active  Members,  27 

Luten,  Daniel  B.,  1056  Lemcke  Annex,  Indianapolis. 

Brids^e  Engineer. 

Applied  Civil  Engineering. 
Mahin,  Edward  G.,  27  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Associate  Professor  of  Chemistry,  Purdue  University. 
Mains,  E.  B.,  212  S.  Grant  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

U.  S.  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 

Plant' Pathology  and  Mycologry. 
Malott,  Burton  J.,  2206  Calhoun  St.,  Fort  Wayne. 

Teacher  in  High  School. 

Physiography  and  Geology. 
Malott,  Clyde  A.,  521  E.  Second  St.,  Bloomington. 

Geology. 
Markle,  M.  S.,  Richmond. 

Professor  of  Botany,  Earlham  College. 
Martin,  Dr.  H.  H.,  Laporte,  Ind. 

Surgery  and  Urology. 
Mason,  T.  E.,  130  Andrew  Place,  West  Lafayette. 

Instructor  Mathematics,  Purdue  University. 

Mathematics. 
McCarty,  Morris  E.,  224  Fowler  Ave.,  West  Lafayette. 

Student  in  Bacteriology. 
Mclndoo,  N.  E.,  7225  Blair  Road,  Takoma  Park,  Washington,  D.  C. 

U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture,  Bureau  of  Entomology. 

Insect  Physiology. 
McKinley,  Lester,  Bloomington. 

Graduate  Student  in  Botany,  Indiana  University. 
Molby,  Fred  A.,  226  Lorraine  Ave.,  Cincinnati,  0. 

Physics,  University  of  Cincinnati. 
Montgomery,  Dr.  H.  T.,  244  Jefferson  Bldg.,  South  Bend. 

Geology. 
Morrison,  Harold,  Bureau  of  Entomology,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Entomology. 
Morrison,  Louis,  80  S.  West  St.,  Richmond. 
Munro,  G.  W.,  202  Waldron  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Mechanical  Engineering. 
Myers,  B.  D.,  321  N.  Washington  St.,  Bloomington. 

Professor  of  Anatomy,  Indiana  University. 
Nelson,  Ralph  Emory,  112  W.  Wood  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Chemistry,  Purdue  University. 
Nothnagel,  Mildred,  Gainesville,  Fla. 

Assistant    Plant    Physiology,    Experiment    Station,    University    of 
Florida. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


28  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Noyes,  Harry  A.,  Mellon  Institute,  Pittsburgh,  Pa. 

Research  Chemist  and  Bacteriologist.  ' 

Oberholzer,  H.  C,  National  Museum,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Biology. 
O'Neal,  Claude  E.,  247  W.  Lincoln  Ave.,  Delaware,  0. 

Botany  and  Bacteriology. 
Orahood,  Harold,  West  Middleton,  Howard  County. 

Geology. 
Osner,  G.  A.,  Broadview,  Mont. 

Plant  Pathology. 
Owen,  D.  A.,  200  S.  State  St.,  Franklin. 

Professor  of  Biology.     (Retired.) 

Biology. 
Papish,  Jacob,  Ithaca,  N.  Y. 

Department  of  Chemistry,  Cornell  University. 

Chemistry. 
PefFer,  Harvey  Creighton,  412  N.  Salisbury  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Head  of  Chemical  Engineering,  Purdue  University. 
Petry,  Edward  Jacob,  210  Ingalls  St.,  S.  Ann  Arbor,  Mich. 

Botany,  University  of  Michigan. 

Botany,  Plant  Breeding,  Plant  Pathology,  Bio-Chemistry. 
Pickett,  Fermen  L.,  Pullman  College  Station  No.  36,  Washington. 

Botany. 
Pinkerton,  Earl,  Hutsonville,  111. 

Biology  and  Agriculture. 
Pipal,  F.  J.,  114  S.  Salisbury  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Botany,  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 
Prentice,  Burr  N.,  400  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Assistant  Professor  of  Forestry,  Purdue. 
Ramsey,  Glenn  Blaine,  Orono,  Me. 

Botany. 
Richards,  Aute,  307  E.  Jefferson  St.,  Crawfordsville. 

Professor  of  Zoology,  Wabash  College. 
Richards,  Mrs.  Mildred  Hoge,  307  E.  Jefferson  St.,  Crawfordsville. 

Zoology. 
Rifenburgh,  S.  A.,  Valparaiso,  Ind. 

Instructor  Botany,  Valparaiso  University. 

Botany. 
Riley,  Katherine,  Robert  W.  Long  Hospital,  Indianapolis. 
Roark,  Louis,  Box  1162,  Tulsa,  Okla. 

Roxana  Petroleum  Company. 

Petroleum  Geologist. 
Scott,  W.  R.  M.,  West  Lafayette. 

Agricultural  Botany,  Purdue  University. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Active  Members.  29 

Sheak,  William  H.,  703  N.  19th  St.,  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Mammalogy. 
Showalter,  Ralph  W.,  Indianapolis. 

Director  Biological  Department,  Eli  Lilly  &  Co. 

Biology. 
Silvey,  Oscar  W.,  College  Station,  Texas. 

Physics,  University  of  Texas. 
Smith,  Chas.  Piper,  Hyattsville,  Md. 

State  Seed  Inspection  Officer. 

Systematic  Botany. 
Snodgrass,  R.  E.,  2063  Park  Road,  Washington,  D.  C. 

U.  S.  Bureau  of  Entomology,  Extension  Division. 

Entomology. 
Spitzer,  George,  1000  Seventh  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Dairy  Chemist,  Purdue  University. 

Chemistry. 
Spong,  Philip,  3873  E.  Washington  St.,  Indianapolis. 

Biology. 
Stoltz,  Charles,  530  N.  Lafayette  St.,  South  Bend. 

Physician. 
Stone,  Ralph  Bushnell,  307  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Mathematics,  Purdue  University. 
Sulzer,  Elmer  G.,  Madison. 

Geologry. 
Taylor,  Joseph  C,  117  Ninth  St,  Logansport. 

Student  in  University  of  Wisconsin. 
Terry,  Oliver  P.,  State  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Professor  of  Physiology,  Purdue  University. 
Tetrault,  Philip  Armand,  607  University  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Assistant  Professor  of  Biology,  Purdue  University. 
Tevis,  Emma  Louise,  122  W.  isth  St.,  Indianapolis. 

Department  Experimental  Medicine,  Eli  Lilly  &  Co. 
Thompson,  Clem  0.,  105  N.  High  St.,  Salem. 

Superintendent  of  Schools. 

Biology. 
Thombum,  A.  D.,  Indianapolis,  care  Pitman-Moore  Company. 

Chemistry. 
Toole,  E.  H.,  719  N.  Main  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Assistant  Professor  of  Botany,  Purdue  University. 

Botany,  Plant  Physiology  and  Pathology. 
Troop,  James,  West  Lafayette. 

Professor  of  Entomology,  Purdue  University. 
Tucker,  William  Motier,  Apartment  33,  Alhambra  Court,  Columbus,  O. 

Ohio  State  University,  Department  of  Geology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


30  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

\ 
Turner,  B.  B.,  1017  Park  Ave.,  Indianapolis. 

Associate  Professor  of  Pharmacology,  Indiana  University  School  »cft 
Medicine. 
Turner,  William  P.,  222  Lutz  Ave.,  Lafayette. 

Professor  of  Practical  Mechanics,  Purdue  University. 
Vallance,  Chas.  A.,  R.  R.  J-1,  Box  132,  Indianapolis. 

Instructor  Emmerich  Manual  Training  School. 

Chemistry. 
Van  Doren,  Pr.  Lloyd,  Earlham  College,  Richmond. 

Chemistry. 
Van  Nuys,  W.  C,  Box  No.  34,  Newcastle. 

Superintendent  Indiana  Epileptic  Village,  Fort  Wayne. 
Voorhees,  Herbert  S.,  804  Wildwood  Ave.,  Fort  Wayne. 

Instructor  in  Chemistry  and  Botany,  Fort  Wayne  High  School. 

Chemistry. 
Wildman,  E.  A.,  care  of  Eli  Lilly  &  Co.,  Indianapolis. 

Director  of  Chemical  Research. 

Chemistry. 
Watson,  Carl  G.,  120  Thornell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Instructor  in  Physics,  Purdue  University. 
Weatherwax,  Paul,  Athens,  Ga. 

Associate  Professor  of  Botany,  University  of  Georgia. 

Botany. 
Weems,  M.  L.,  102  Garfield  Ave.,  Valparaiso. 

Professor  of  Botany. 

Botany  and  Human  Physiology. 
Weyant,  James  E.,  336  Audubon  Road,  Indianapolis. 

Teacher   of   Physics,   Shortridge   High   School   and   Indiana   Dental 
College. 

Physics. 
Whiting,  Rex  Anthony,  118  Marstellar  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Veterinary  Department,  Purdue  University. 
Wiancko,  Alfred  T.,  230  S.  Ninth  St.,  Lafayette. 

Chief  in  Soils  and  Crops,  Purdue  University. 

Agronomy. 
Wiley,  Ralph  Benjamin,  770  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Hydraulic  Engineering,  Purdue  University. 
Williams,  A.  A.,  Valparaiso. 

Mathematics,  Valparaiso  University. 

Mathematics,  Astronomy. 
Wilson,  Charles  E.,  Brazil. 

Zoology  and  Economic  Entomology. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Active  Members.  31 

Wilson,  Mrs.  Etta  L.,  2  Clarendon  Ave.,  Detroit,  Mich. 

Botany  and  Zoology. 
Wood,  Harry  W.,  1538  Rosemont  Ave.,  Chicago,  111. 

Geography  and  Geology. 
Woodbury,  C.  G.,  615  University  St.,  West  Lafayette. 

Director  of  Experiment  Station. 
Wynn,  Frank  B.,  Hume-Mansur  Bldg.,  Indianapolis. 

Professor  of  Pathology,  Indiana  University  School  of  Medicine. 
Young,  Gilbert  A.,  739  Owen  St.,  Lafayette. 

Head  of  Department  of  Mechanical  Engineering,  Purdue  University. 
Zehring,  William  Arthur,  303  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette, 

Assistant  Professor  of  Mathematics,  Purdue  University. 

Mathematics. 

Fellows 58 

Members,  Active   186 

Members  and  Fellows,  Non-resident 38 

Total    282 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


32  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Minutes  of  the  Spring  Meeting. 

INDIANA  ACADEMY  OF  SCIENCE. 

May  24  and  25,  1918. 


The  Illinois  Academy  of  Science  joined  the  Indiana  Academy  of 
Science  in  its  Spring  Meeting  on  Friday  and  Saturday,  May  24  and  25, 
1918,  in  the  new  State  Park,  Turkey  Run,  in  Parke  County,  and  at 
The  Shades,  in  Montgomery  County.  Seventy-two  members  and  guests 
of  the  two  Academies  were  in  attendance  at  the  meeting. 

Touring  parties  were  organized  at  the  park  entrance  under  com- 
petent guides  as  groups  of  individuals  arnved  by  automobile.  They 
devoted  the  forenoon  of  Friday  to  exploring  the  magniiAcent  forest,  the 
rugged  trails,  picturesque  ravines  and  the  watercourses  of  the  park. 
A  basket-luncheon  at  noon  afforded  opportunity  to  renew  old  acquaint- 
ances and  to  make  new  ones  among  kindred  spirits. 

After  luncheon  the  groups  were  reassembled  for  the  trip  across  the 
swaying  suspension  bridge  and  a  tramp  into  Rocky  Hollow  to  the  rugged, 
moss-covered  gorges  where  giant  kettle-holes  and  eroded  or  broken  rocks 
indicate,  of  the  past,  a  rush  of  water  quite  out  of  proportion  to  the 
amount  that  now  trickles  over  the  same  ledges  on  its  way  into  Sugar 
Creek.  Enthusiastic  groups  of  individuals  explored  the  narrow  ravines 
and  slippery  trails  to  study  the  geological  formations  or  to  try  the  cool 
waters  of  an  isolated  kettle-hole. 

About  four  o'clock  a  long  procession  of  automobiles  carried  the 
Academy  party  over  the  intervening  fifteen  miles  of  rugged  country 
covered  with  magniificent  forests  and  beautiful  streams  to  The  Shades, 
where  dinner  was  provided  in  the  spacious  dining-room  of  The  Shades 
Hotel.  The  freedom  of  the  park  was  extended  through  the  courtesy  of 
Mr.  Frisz,  the  proprietor  and  manager. 

A  general  session  of  the  Academies  was  held  in  the  grove  after 
the  dinner. 

The  broad  verandas  and  beautiful  grove  about  the  hotel  afforded 
opportunity  for  further  visiting  until  long  after  the  more  sedate  mem- 
bers had  gone  into  slumber-land. 

Saturday,  May  25,  1918. 

After  breakfast  at  The  Shades  Hotel,  tramping-parties  were  quickly 
organized  to  explore  the  beauties  of  The  Shades  Park,  the  waterfalls 
and  eroded  ravines,  the   Devil's   Punchbowl  and  other  geological   for- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Minutes — Spring  Meeting.  33 

mations  of  unusual  interest.  The  fantastic  shapes  of  rocks  seem  to 
have  appealed  to  some  imaginative  soul  who  believed  they  could  have 
had  no  use  but  to  the  devil,  therefore  ascribed  them  to  his  satanic 
majesty  as  articles  of  domestic  use.  The  Devil's  Backbone  then  became 
the  objective  point  of  others  who  followed  the  narrow,  beaten  trail 
along  Sugar  Creek  to  the  interesting  high  ridge  of  exposed  rocks  that 
bears  this  name.  The  return  to  the  hotel  afforded  opportunity  to  see 
the  points  of  interest  that  had  been  missed  on  our  way.  After  a  hearty 
luncheon  and  a  brief  exchange  of  experiences  the  groups  dispersed  with 
the  feeling  that  the  1918  Spring  Meeting  had  brought  a  new  outlook 
and  new  experiences. 

The  following  members  of  the  Illinois  and  Indiana  Academies  and 
their  guests  attended  the  Spring  Meeting: 

Flora  Anderson,  Bloomington. 
W.  S.  Bayley,  Urbana,  111. 
Mrs.  W.  S.  Bayley,  Urbana,  111. 
Miss  E.  E.  Bayley,  Urbana,  111. 
C.  A.  Behrens,  West  Lafayette. 
Elliot  Blackwalder,  Urbana,  111. 
Mrs.  Elliot  Blackwalder,  Urbana,  111. 
W.  S.  Blatchley,  Indianapolis. 
F.  J.  Breeze,  Terre  Haute. 
Edwin  M.  Bruce,  Terre  Haute. 
Stanley  Coulter,  Lafayette. 
Ulysses  O.  Cox,  Terre  Haute. 
Mrs.  Kate  Meehan  Cox,  Terre  Haute. 
M.  K.  Davis,  Terre  Haute. 
Mrs.  Davis,  Terre  Haute. 
Chas.  C.  Deam,  Bluffton. 
Chas.  S.  Driver,  Bloomington. 
Howard  E.  Enders,  West  Lafayette. 
Arthur  L.  Foley,  Bloomington. 
Mrs.  Loretta  Foley,  Bloomington. 
L.  W.  Fisher,  West  Lafayette. 
M.  L.  Fisher,  West  Lafayette. 
W.  G.  Gingery,  Indianapolis. 
W.  F.  Gidley,  West  Lafayette. 
Richard  M.  Holman,  Crawfordsville. 
Geo.  N.  Hoffer,  West  Lafayette. 
H.  S.  Jackson,  West  Lafayette. 
L.  E.  Kennedy,  Urbana,  111. 
Chas.  T,  Knipp,  Urbana,  111. 
Mrs.  Knipp,  Urbana,  111. 

a— 16668 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


34  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Miss  Knipp,  Urbana,  111. 

P.  L.  Knipp,  Urbana,  111. 

Wm.  A.  McBeth,  Terre  Haute. 

Mrs.  Wm.  McBeth,  Terre  Haute. 

J.  W.  McCarty,  Lafayette. 

Eula  D.  McEwan,  Washington,  D.  C. 

M.  S.  Markle,  Richmond. 

A.  R.  Middleton,  West  Lafayette. 

C.  F.  Miller,  Urbana,  111. 

W.  J.  Moenkhaus,  Bloomington. 

Edwin  Morrison,  Richmond. 

W.  A.  Noyes,  Urbana,  111. 

Mrs.  Noyes,  Urbana,  111. 

F.  Payne,  Bloomington. 

Burr  N.  Prentice,  West  Lafayette. 

R.  R.  Ramsey,  Blooming^ton. 

Mrs.  Clara  Ramsey,  Bloomington. 

R.  D.  Reed,  Urbana,  111. 

A.  Richards,  Crawfordsville. 

Mildred  H.  Richards,  Crawfordsville. 

Katherine  Riley,  Indianapolis. 

R.  D.  Salisbury,  Chicago,  111. 

Will  Scott,  Bloomington. 

Mrs.  E.  L.  Stevens,  St.  Louis,  Mo. 

Charles  Stoltz,  South  Bend. 

W.  E.  Stone,  West  Lafayette. 

Mrs.  Stone,  West  Lafayette. 

Oliver  P.  Terry,  West  Lafayette. 

Mrs.  0.  P.  Terry,  West  Lafayette. 

P.  A.  Tetrault,  West  Lafayette. 

Emma  L.  Tevis,  Indianapolis. 

W.  Tomlinson,  Urbana,  111. 

E.  H.  Toole,  West  Lafayette. 

Frank  B.  Wade,  Indianapolis. 

Mrs.  F.  B.  Wade,  Indianapolis. 

L.  D.  Waterman,  Indianapolis. 

John  S.  Wright,  Indianapolis. 

Wright,  Indianapolis. 

Frank  B.  Wynn,  Indianapolis. 
Mrs.  F.  B.  Wynn,  Indianapolis. 
Charles  Zeleny,  Urbana,  111. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Minutes — Spring  Meeting,  35 

Business  Meeting  and  General  Session,  Friday,  May  24,  1918. 

A  business  meeting  of  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Science  and  a  gen- 
eral meeting  of  the  Indiana  and  Illinois  Academies  of  Science  was  called 
to  order  by  the  Vice-President,  Dr.  Charles  Stoltz,  in  the  grove  near 
The  Shades  Hotel. 

The  Membership  Committee  proposed  the  following  names  of  persons 
for  membership: 

Harlan  Q.  Acre,  Shoals,  Botany. 

Walter  G.  Gingery,  Indianapolis,  Mathematics. 

Howard  M.  Lahr,  Markle,  Botany  and  Chemistry. 

On  motion,  duly  passed,  they  were  elected  to  membership  in  the 
Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

On  motion  the  reprints  from  the  Proceedings  are  to  have  the  imprint 
of  the  volume,  date  of  publication,  and  paging  of  the  issue  from  which 
they  are  taken. 

The  matter  is  referred  to  the  Publication  Committee  with  power 
to  act. 

On  motion  the  Secretary  is  ordered  to  telegraph  President  E.  B. 
Williamson  an  expression  of  keen  regret  in  his  absence  from  the  Spring 
Meeting,  and  to  extend  greetings  and  best  wishes  of  the  Academy  for 
his  speedy  recovery  to  good  health. 

Vice-President  Stoltz  then  appointed  Stanley  Coulter  to  take  charge 
of  the  informal  meeting  that  followed  and  to  call  upon  various  persons 
for  addresses. 

Dr.  Coulter  gave  a  brief  history  of  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Science 
and  its  relation  to  the  scientific  activities  of  the  State.  He  expressed 
our  appreciation  of  the  presence  of  so  large  a  number  from  the  Illinois 
Academy,  and  pointed  out  that  a  number  of  these  persons  formerly  were 
members  of  the  Indiana  Academy  and  had  an  important  part  in  its 
early  achievements  and  activities. 

A  number  of  persons  then  were  called  upon  to  speak. 

Dr.  Frank  B.  Wynn  of  Indianapolis:  "Why  I  am  a  pathologist  rather 
than  a  naturalist."  He  pointed  out  the  force  of  curiosity  in  the  life  of 
the  investigator,  and  by  means  of  a  number  of  striking  examples  em- 
phasized the  fact  that  curiosity  is  a  driving  power  in  achievement. 

Doctor  W.  A.  Noyes  of  the  University  of  Illinois  expressed  pleasure 
of  the  opportunity  to  attend  this  meeting  and  to  renew  acquaintances 
in  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Science,  of  which  he  was  a  charter  member. 
He  spoke  of  the  early  years  of  the  Academy  and  of  its  influence  in 
academies  and  institutions  of  the  country. 

John  S.  Wright  of  Indianapolis  spoke  on  the  needs  of  an  endowment 
for  the  promotion  and  publication  of  research  in  the  Academy.     A  por- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


36  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

tion  of  this  endowment  very  properly  should  come  from  the  State.  The 
effect  of  the  war  upon  the  matter  of  giving  will  mean  much  for  the 
financial  future  of  the  Academy. 

Doctor  R.  D.  Salisbury  of  the  University  of  Chicago,  representing 
the  Illinois  Academy  of  Science,  spoke  on:  "The  effect  of  the  war  to 
bring  about  a  revaluation  of  the  things  which  we  have  regarded  as 
unimportant."  The  academies  of  science,  represented  by  their  chemists, 
physicists,  biologists,  and  others,  are  interested  in  the  public  health  of 
the  army  at  home  and  in  the  service.  Geologists  have  been  used  by  our 
enemies  to  aid  in  a  determination  of  the  nature  and  kind  of  trenching, 
the  tools  required,  etc.,  and  the  water  supply  for  any  given  region.  Our 
government  has  come  to  realize  the  service  which  its  scientists  in  every 
branch  may  perform,  and  it  is  to  be  hoped  that  enlarged  support  of 
scientific  work  by  the  government  will  come  as  a  result  of  such  re- 
valuation of  the  services  of  science. 

Professor  M.  L.  Fisher  of  Purdue  University  reported  for  the  bird- 
study  group  that  fifty-five  species  of  birds  had  been  observed  during 
the  day. 

Professor  Wm.  McBeth  of  the  State  Normal  School,  Terre  Haute, 
discussed  the  geological  formations  in  the  State  Park,  at  Turkey  Run, 
and  outlined  the  chief  pQints  of  interest  in  the  geology  of  The  Shades 
Park. 

Professor  S.  H.  Jackson  of  the  Agricultural  Experiment  Station, 
Purdue  University,  reported  on  the  species  of  rusts  found,  and  made  a 
special  appeal  for  the  eradication  of  the  barberry,  the  intermediate  host 
of  our  destructive  grain  rust.  He  urged  the  importance  of  its  eradica- 
tion as  a  war-measure  that  is  being  undertaken  by  every  State  in  the 
Union. 

Miss  Flora  Anderson,  student  in  zoology  in  Indiana  University, 
reported  upon  the  number  of  snakes  observed  or  collected  during  the 
day. 

A  rising  vote  of  thanks  was  tendered  Mr.  J.  W.  Frisz,  manager  and 
proprietor  of  The  Shades  Park,  for  his  numerous  courtesies  and  the 
freedom  of  the  park. 

Adjournment. 

Charles  Stoltz,  Vice-President 
Howard  E.  Enders,  Secretary. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Program  of  the  Thirty-Fourth  Annual  Meeting* 

or 

THE  INDIANA  ACADEMY  OF  SCIENCE, 

HELD   AT 

The  Claypool  Hotel,  Indianapolis, 
Thursday,  Friday  and  Saturday,  December  5,  6  and  7. 


OFFICERS. 

E.  B.  Williamson,  President. 
Charles  Stoltz,  Vice-President. 
Howard  E.  Enders,  Secretary. 
William  M.  Blanchard,  Treasurer. 
P.  A.  Tetrault,  Assistant  Secretary. 
Frank  B.  Wade,  Press  Secretary. 
Lee  F.  Bennett,  Editor. 

PROGRAM  COMMITTEE. 

C.  C.  Deam.  John  S.  Wright. 

Frank  B.  Wade. 

GENERAL  PROGRAM. 

Thursday. 

Meeting  of  the  Executive  Committee,  Claypool  Hotel 8:00  p.  m. 

Friday. 

Business  Session  9 :30  a.  m. 

General  Session 10 :00  a.  m. 

Sectional  Meetings  2 :00  p.  m. 

Informal  Dinner  at  the  Claypool  Hotel 6 :30  p.  m. 

The  address  of  the  retiring  President,  E.  B.   Williamson,  of  Bluffton, 

will  be  delivered  at  this  time.    Title,  "How  Should  the  Student  Body 

Be  Recruited?" 
Principal  Business  Session 8:00  to  8:30  p. m. 

*  The  fall  meeting  was  cancelled   because  of  the  influenza  epidemic.     The  business 
was  held  in  the  Claypool  Hotel.  Indianapolis.  December  7,  1918. 


(37) 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


38  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

FRroAY,  8;30  p.m. 

Assembly  Room,  Claypool  Hotel. 

Symposium  on  Important  Contributions  of  Science  to  Military  Efficiency. 

Leaders. 

For  Astronomy Prof.  W.  A.  Cogshall,  Indiana  University 

For  Bacteriology Dr.   Will   Shimer 

Director  State  Laboratory  of  Hygiene 

For  Botany Prof.  R.  M.  Holman,  Wabash  College 

For  Chemistry F.  R.  Eldred 

Director  of  Scientific  Department,  Eli  Lilly  &  Co.,  Indianapolis 

For  Geology Prof.  L.  F.  Bennett,  Valparaiso  University 

For  Physics Prof.  Chas.  M.  Smith,  Purdue  University 

For  Physiography.  ..Prof.  W.  A.  McBeth,  Indiana  State  Normal  School 
For  Zoology Prof.  H.  L.  Bruner,  Butler  College 

Saturday. 
Business  Session 9  a.  m. 


GENERAL  SESSION. 
Friday  10:00  a.m. 

1.  The  Proposed  Conservation  Bill — Governor  Goodrich.     To  be  given 

on  arrival  of  Governor  Goodrich. 

2.  The  Barberry  and  Its  Relation  to  the  Stem  Rust  of  Wheat  in  In- 

diana, 20  minutes — F.  J.  Pipal,  Purdue  University. 

3.  Evolutionary  Philosophy  and  the  German  War — A.  Richards,  Wa- 

bash College. 

4.  Geography  in  Colleges  and  Universities  of  the  United  States,  20 

minutes — F.  J.  Breeze,  Indiana  State  Normal  School. 

5.  The  Life  of  the  Late  Dr.  Luther  D.  Waterman — A.  L.  Foley,  In- 

diana University. 

6.  In  Memoriam,  Prof.  Geo.  I).  Timmons — L.  F.  Bennett,  Valparaiso 

University. 

7.  Biography  of  the  Scientific  Work  of  William  James  Jones,  Jr. — 

S.  D.  Conner,  Associate  Chemist,  Agricultural   Experiment  Sta- 
tion, Purdue  University. 

8.  Observations   on   1,500   Registrants   of  the   First  Conscription,  30 

minutes — Dr.  Chas.  Stoltz,  South  Bend. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Program.  39 

9.    Mental  Defectives ;  the  Problem ;  Conditions  in  Indiana,  20  minutes — 
Miss  Edna  R.  Jatho,  Psychologist,  Philadelphia  Public  Schools. 
10.    Textbook  Treatments  of  Diffusion  and  Osmosis,  15  minutes — Paul 
Weatherwax,  Indiana  University. 


CONTINUATION  OF  GENERAL  SESSION,  FOLLOWED  BY 
SECTIONAL  MEETINGS. 

FRroAY  2:00  P.  M  and  Saturday  9:30  a.m. 

Bacteriology, 

11.  Number  of  Colonies  for  a  Satisfactory  Soil  Plate — H.  A.  Noyes  and 

G.   L.   Grounds,   Agricultural  Experiment   Station,  Purdue  Uni- 
versity. 

12.  The  Length  of  Time  to  Incubate  Petri  Plates— H.  A.  Noyes,  J.  D. 

Luckett    and    Edwin    Voigt,    Agricultural    Experiment    Station, 
Purdue  University. 

13.  Bacteria  in   Frozen   Soil — H.   A.   Noyes,  Agricultural   Experiment 

Station,  Purdue  University. 

Botany, 

14.  Reproduction  in  Coleochaete  Scutata,  8  minutes    (lantern) — M.   S. 

Markle,  Earlham  College. 

15.  Some  Abnormalities  in  Plant  Structure,  2  minutes — M.  S.  Markle, 

Earlham  College. 

16.  Plants  of  Boone  County,  Kentucky  (by  title) — James  C.  Nelson. 

17.  Plants  New  or  Rare  to  Indiana,  VIII,  10  minutes — Chas.  C.  Deam, 

Acting  State  Forester. 

18.  The   Morphological   Basis   of   Certain   Problems   in    Inheritance   in 

Maize,  12  minutes — Paul  Weatherwax,  Indiana  University. 

Chemistry. 

19.  Analysis  of  100  Soils  in  Allen  County,  Indiana — R.  H.  Carr  and 

V.  R.  Phares,  Purdue  University. 

20.  Relation  of  Nitrogen,  Phosphorus  and  Organic  Matter  to  Com  Yield 

in   Elkhart  County,  Indiana — R.  H.   Carr  and  LeRoy  Hoffman, 
Purdue  University. 

21.  Flame  Reactions  of  Thallium,  10  minutes — Jacob  Papish,  Purdue 

University. 

22.  Sulphur  Dioxide  as  a  Source  of  Volcanic  Sulphur,  5  minutes — Jacob 

Papish,  Purdue  University. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


40  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Geology. 

m 

23.  A  Preliminary  Report  on  the  Origin  of  Indianaite  in  Indiana,   10 

minutes — Wm.  N.  Logan,  Indiana  University. 

24.  The  Occurrence  of  Coal  in  Monroe  County,  Indiana,  5  minutes — 

Wm.  N.  Logan,  Indiana  University. 

25.  The  Occurrence  of  Indianaite  in  Monroe  County,  Indiana,  5  min- 

utes— Wm.  N.  Logan,  Indiana  University. 

26.  Notes  on  the  Paleontology  of  Certain  Chester  Formations  in  South- 

ern Indiana,  10  minutes — Allen  D.  Hole,  Earlham  College. 

27.  Soil  Survey  of  Cass  County,  10  minutes — Colonzo  C.  Beals,  Indiana 

University. 

Physics, 

28.  A  New  Method  of  Measuring  the  Velocity  of  Sound,  15  minutes 

(lantern) — A.  L.  Foley,  Indiana  University. 

29.  The  Instantaneous  Velocity  of  Sound  at  Points  Near  the  Source, 

5  minutes   (lantern) — A.  L.  Foley,  Indiana  University. 

30.  An   Experimental   Determination   of   the   Relation    Between    Sound 

Velocity  and  Intensity,  5  minutes  (lantern) — A.  L.  Foley,  Indiana 
University. 

31.  An   Experimental  Determination  of  the  Duration  and  Luminosity 

of  an  Electric  Spark,  10  minutes  (lantern) — A.  L.  Foley,  Indiana 
University. 

32.  A  Simple  Method  of  Determining  the  Character  and  Frequency  of 

the  Oscillation  of  Machine  Parts,  5  minutes    (lantern) — A.    L. 
Foley,  Indiana  University. 

33.  Energy  Losses  in  Commercial   Hammers,  5  minutes — Edwin   Mor- 

rison, Earlham  College. 

34.  New  Surface  Tension  Apparatus,  5  minutes  (lantern) — Edwin  Mor- 

rison, Earlham  College. 

35.  Effect  of   Certain   Dissolved    Salts   Upon   the   Surface   Tension    of 

Water,  10  minutes  (lantern) — Edwin  Morrison,  Earlham  Collegre. 

Physiography. 

36.  The  Chester  Series  of  Indiana  and  Their  Correlation  with  Those  of 

Kentucky,  10  minutes — Clyde  A.  Malott  and  James  D.  Thomp- 
son, Jr. 

37.  A  Peculiar  and  Remarkable  Adjustment  of  Drainage — the  Case  of 

"The  American  Bottoms"  of  Greene  County,  Indiana,  10  minutes — 
Clyde  A.  Malott  and  Frederick  J.  Breeze. 

38.  A  Notable  Case  of  Successive  Stream  Piracy,  10  minutes — Clyde  A. 

Malott 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Program.  41 

39.  Monadnocks  and  Similar  Physiographic  Features,  10  minutes — Clyde 

A.  Malott. 

40.  A  New  Explanation  of  the  Valley  Filling  of  Southwestern  Indiana 

and  Associated  Regions,  10  minutes — Clyde  A.  Malott. 

Zoology, 

41.  The    Crustaceans    of    Lake    Maxinkuckee — Barton    W.    Evermann, 

Director  of  the  Museum  of  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences, 
and  Howard  W.  Clark,  Scientific  Assistant,  U.  S.  Bureau  of 
Fisheries  Biological  Station,  Fairport,  Iowa;  20  minutes. 

42.  The  Insects  of  the  Lake  Maxinkuckee  Region — Barton  W.   Ever- 

mann, Director  of  the  Museum  of  the  California  Academy  of 
Sciences,  and  Howard  W.  Clark,  Scientific  Assistant,  U.  S.  Bureau 
of  Fisheries,  Biological  Station,  Fairport,  Iowa. 

43.  Aphids  on  Fruit  Trees,  5  minutes — S.  D.  Conner,  Associate  Chemist, 

Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  Purdue  University. 

44.  Some  Further  Experiments  for  Low  and  High  Bristle  Number  in  a 

Mutant  Strain  of  Drosophila  Ampelophila,  10  minutes — F.  Payne, 
Indiana  University. 

45.  A  Memorial,  Albert  Homer  Purdue — George  H.  Ashley,  Washing- 

ton, D.  C. 

46.  A  Memorial,  Prof.  M.  J.   Golden — R.   B.   Trueblood,  Purdue  Uni- 

versity. 

47.  Some  Trees  of  Indiana — F.  M.  Andrews,  Indiana  University. 

48.  Ascomycetes  New  to  the  Flora  of  Indiana — Bruce  Fink  and  Sylvia 

C.  Fuson,  Miami  University. 

49.  The  Dormant   Period  of  Timothy   Seed   After  Harvesting — M.   L. 

Fisher,  Purdue  University. 

50.  The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes  of  Northwestern  Indiana — C.  W.  G. 

Eifrig,  Oak  Park,  111. 

51.  A  Synopsis  of  the  Races  of  the  Guina  Flycatcher — Harry  C.  Ober- 

holser,  the  U.  S.  National  Museum. 

52.  Erosional  Freaks  of  the  Saluda  Limestone — Elmer  G.  Sulzer,  Mad- 

ison. 

53.  Remnant  Monuments  Near  Madison — Elmer  G.  Sulzer,  Madison. 

54.  A   Kinetic  Model  of  the  Electron  Atom — R.  R.   Ramsey,  Indiana 

University. 

55.  New  Methods  of  Measuring  the  Speed  of  Sound  Pulses  Near  the 

Source — Arthur  L.  Foley,  Indiana  University. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


42  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

MiNuras  OF  THE  Fall  Meeting, 

INDIANA  ACADEMY  OF  SCIENCE, 

Claypool  Hotel,  Indianapous,  Ind.,  December  7,  1918. 


The  Executive  Committee  of  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Science  met 
at  the  Claypool  Hotel  and  was  called  to  order  by  the  President,  E.  B. 
Williamson.  The  following  members  were  present:  F.  M.  Andrews, 
L.  F.  Bennett,  Wm.  Blanchard,  A.  W.  Butler,  W.  Cogshall,  S.  Coulter. 
C.  C.  Deam,  R.  W.  McBride,  J.  P.  Naylor,  C.  Stoltz,  P.  A.  Tetrault, 
F.  B.  Wade,  E.  B.  Williamson  and  J.  S.  Wright. 

The  reports  of  the  standing  committees  were  first  taken  up. 

Program  Committee — Oral  reports  by  C.  C.  Deam  and  F.  B.  Wade. 
On  account  of  the  influenza  epidemic,  the  printed  report  was  not  carried 
out,  but  all  papers  submitted  will  be  printed  in  the  regular  Proceedings, 

Committee  on  Biological  Survey — Written  report  submitted  to  the 
President  by  the  Chairman,  H.  S.  Jackson,  was  read  by  the  Secretary. 
A  number  of  investigations  are  in  progress,  and  it  is  hoped  that  the 
work  under  way  will  be  in  shape  for  publication  in  the  Proceedings  of 
the  Academy  at  an  early  date. 

Committee  on  Distribution  of  Proceedings — Due  to  the  absence  of  the 
Chairman,  H.  E.  Enders,  the  report  was  given  by  Wm.  Blanchard.  The 
delay  in  the  distribution  of  the  Proceedings  was  explained. 

Committee  on  Amendments — Work  being  completed,  the  committee 
was  discharged. 

Committee  on  Relation  of  Academy  to  State — On  motion  a  special 
committee  of  five  was  appointed  by  the  President,  the  President  acting 
as  Chairman,  to  consider  the  publication  of  the  Evermann  Report  on 
the  Biology  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee. 

Adjourned  at  1:00  p.m.  for  luncheon. 

Meeting  reopened  at  2:00  p.m. 

On  motion  a  committee  was  appointed  to  confer  with  the  Senator 
and  Representative  appointed  by  the  Governor  to  frame  the  bill  for  the 
naming  of  a  Conservation  Commission.  The  object  is  to  have  the  fol- 
lowing embodied  in  the  bill: 

Three  men  appointed  from  each  of  the  following  institutions:  Indiana 
Academy  of  Science,  Indiana  Horticultural  Society,  Indiana  Sportsmen'? 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Minutes — Fall  Meeting.  43 

Association,  the  higher  institutions  of  the  State,  including  universities, 
colleges  and  normal  schools,  who  shall  constitute  a  committee  to  nom- 
inate the  director  of  the  commission. 

The  following  committee  was  appointed  by  the  President;  R.  W. 
McBride,  J.  S.  Wright,  F.  B.  Wynn,  W.  Cogshall,  S.  Coulter. 

Wm.  M.  Blanchard,  Treasurer,  reported  as  follows: 

Balance  in  treasury  December  2,  1917 $524  58 

Dues  collected  during  the  year 224  00 

Total $748  58 

Expenditures 286  51 

Balance  in  treasury  December  1,  1918 $462  07 

The  report  was  received  and  referred  to  the  Auditing  Committee. 

The  Membership  Committee  proposed  the  following  names  of  persons 
for  membership: 

Frank  Gf.  Bates,  908  E.  Atwat^r  Ave.,  Bloomington — Political  Science. 

Walter  W.  Bonns,  care  of  Eli  Lilly  &  Co.,  Indianapolis — Plant 
Physiology. 

Edgar  Brock  Carter,  2615  Ashland  Ave.,  Indianapolis — Chemistry 
and  Bacteriology. 

Frank  R.  Eldred,  3325  Kenwood  Ave.,  Indianapolis — Chemistry. 

Harold  Gray,  2813  Ruckle  St.,  Indianapolis — Chemistry. 

Aubrey  Chester  Grubb,  427  Russell  St.,  West  Lafayette — Chemistry. 

Jas.  Wm.  Jackson,  Shortridge  High  School,  Indianapolis — Chemistry. 

John  C.  Jopling,  421  — .  Emerson  Ave.,  Indianapolis — Chemistry. 

Daniel  B.  Luten,  1056  Lemcke  Annex,  Indianapolis — Civil  Engi- 
neering. 

Thomas  E.  Nicholson,  N.  Park  Ave.,  Bloomington — Psychology. 

Mrs.  L.  W.  Pressey,  N.  Park  Ave.,  Bloomington — Psychology. 

S.  L.  Pressey,  N.  Park  Ave.,  Bloomington — Psycholog^y. 

Paris  Stockdale,  425  S.  Grant  St.,  Bloomington — Geologfy. 

Elmer  G.  Sulzer,  Madison — Geology. 

Myron  W.  Tatlock,  Shortridge  High  School,  Indianapolis — Physics 
and  Chemistry. 

David  H.  Thompson,  Dayton — Biology. 

E.  A.  Wildman,  care  of  Eli  Lilly  &  Co.,  Indianapolis — Chemistry. 

Committee  on  Academy  Foundations — The  report  was  laid  on  the 
table. 

Printing  Committee — Report  was  accepted,  and  on  motion  the  Editor's 
bill  is  to  be  included  in  this  year's  expenses. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


44  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Professor  J.  M.  Aldrich  was  elected  a  Fellow  of  the  Academy. 

On  motion  Professor  J.  M.  Aldrich's  name  was  transferred  to  the 
non-resident  list. 

On  motion  it  was  decided  that  only  paying  Fellows  and  members, 
both  resident  and  non-resident,  are  to  receive  the  Proceedings. 

On  motion  the  Secretary  and  Treasurer  are  instructed  to  nominate 
Fellows  and  members  to  be  placed  on  the  non-resident  list,  such  Fellows 
and  members  to  be  chosen  from  those  who  remain  in  active  scientific 
work.  These  same  are  to  be  voted  on  at  the  regular  meeting  of  the 
Executive  Conmiittee,  subject  to  the  approval  of  the  Ac&demy. 

Nominating  Committee — The  report  of  the  committee  was  to  the 
effect  that  the  present  officers  should  continue  in  office  till  the  next  reg- 
ular meeting.  The  canceling  of  the  annual  meeting  of  the  Academy 
has  brought  about  conditions  which  make  it  impossible  to  hold  an  elec- 
tion at  this  time. 

Adjourned  3:45  p.m. 

E.  B.  Williamson,  President. 

P.  A.  Tetrault,  Assistant  Secretary. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


President's  Address. 


E.  B.  Williamson. 


HOW  SHOULD  THE  STUDENT  BODY  BE  RECRUITED? 

Some  time  after  the  English  blockade  went  into  effect,  a  public  official 
learned  to  his  surprise  that  there  was  some  relation  between  fats  and 
explosives.  The  relation  was  not  clear  in  his  mind,  but  he  said  he 
understood  it  was  a  recent  discovery.  Since  then  there  has  been  a  more 
or  less  insistent  demand  in  England  that  more  science  should  be  included 
in  the  university  curricula  offered  those  who  were  to  become  the  public 
men  of  the  British  Empire. 

Prior  to  the  war  these  curricula  have  been  much  debated  in  all  coun- 
tries. During  the  past  twenty-five  years  high  school  courses  have  gone 
to  the  maximum  of  subjects  and  the  minimum  of  thoroughness.  The 
requirements  generally  in  the  science  course  in  universities  specify  that 
the  student  must  study  French  or  German,  overlooking  the  obvious  fact 
that  a  student  who  progresses  to  a  point  where  either  foreign  language 
is  essential  requires  both.  To  a  dispassionate  observer,  therefore,  it 
seems  that  the  making  over  of  curricula  has  resulted  in  small  if  any 
improvement.  Certainly  the  present  curricula  are  giving  us  no  products 
of  a  more  gigantic  stature  than  the  Huxleys,  Kelvins  and  Haeckels  of 
a  past  generation,  themselves  often  critics  of  these  very  curricula. 

Is  it  not  possible  that  some  other  more  important  factor  is  involved 
here?  May  it  not  be  the  composition  of  the  student  body  which  is  at 
fault?  Through  elective  courses  and  studies  students  dictate  the  cur- 
ricula to  a  considerable  extent.  For  on  their  selection  depends  largely 
the  relative  strength  of  the  various  departments  in  every  university. 
It  seems,  therefore,  that  the  composition  of  the  student  body  is  of  more 
immediate  concern  than  the  subject-matter  studied.  Professors  cannot 
select  or  make  students.  Students  can  determine  their  professors;  and 
it  was  an  old  Scotch  professor  who  said :  "The  university  is  a  fine  place 
if  it  were  not  for  the  students." 

Universities,  their  faculties  and  students  are  an  economic  burden  to 
be  borne  only  as  society  receives  a  commensurate  return  for  their  activi- 
ties. There  is  every  reason  to  believe  that  following  the  war  such  insti- 
tutions will  be  scrutinized  as  possibly  they  have  never  been  in  the  past. 
The  composition  of  the  student  body  will,  I  believe,  largely  determine 
the  verdict  under  which  such  institutions  must  prosper  or  decline. 

(45) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


46  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

How  is  the  composition  of  the  student  body  determined,  or,  in  other 
words,  how  is  the  student  body  recruited? 

In  the  early  winter  of  1917  a  leading  weekly  naively  remarked  that 
the  criticism  sometimes  made  that  the  sons  of  the  rich  and  well-to^ 
were  not  doing  their  part  in  the  war  was  disproved  by  the  decreased 
university  enrollments.  Or,  to  put  it  bluntly,  the  institutions  dependent 
on  taxes  or  on  endowments  made  valuable  through  the  labors  of  society 
as  a  whole  were  attended  by  the  children  of  only  a  portion  of  this  soci- 
ety, parental  wealth  being  the  determining  factor.  High  school  teachers 
of  experience  will  know  exactly  what  I  mean.  The  matter  is  as  obvious 
as  it  is  objectionable.  Under  unsettled  social  conditions  it  is  a  matter 
that  might  determine  the  very  life  of  the  institutions  we  all  wish  to  see 
prosper,  believing  as  we  do  that  the  salvation  of  the  world  is  in  their 
hands. 

The  answer  to  our  problem  is  so  easy  and  so  just  that  one  can  only 
wonder  why  so  plain  a  reform  has  been  so  long  delayed.  It  is  not  to 
be  solved  by  the  wholesale  education  of  all  high  school  graduates  of  a 
certain  age  as  the  government  has  recently  undertaken  as  a  war 
measure.  Rather  it  is  to  be  solved  along  the  lines  of  the  following 
tentative  plan: 

The  faculty  of  each  commissioned  and  certified  high  school,  the 
county  superintendent,  the  superintendent  of  each  school,  and  the  town- 
ship trustees  or  board  of  education  shall  at  commencement  designate 
209^  or  259^  of  the  graduates  of  each  school  as  beneficiaries  under  this 
plan.  The  basis  of  selection  of  beneficiaries  shall  be  the  class  record  of 
graduates  during  their  high  school  course.  Each  beneficiary  shall  be 
permitted  to  select  any  course  of  study  desired  in  any  school  in  the  State 
approved  by  the  State  Board  of  Education,  provided  that  any  course  so 
selected  must  be  in  advance  of  high  school  work.  Each  beneficiary  shall 
be  paid  for  work  done  in  any  such  school  as  follows:  $325  for  the  first 
year,  $350  for  the  second  year,  $375  for  the  third  year,  and  $400  for 
the  fourth  year,  provided  that  during  his  course  he  shall  carry  at  least 
fifteen  hours  recitation,  or  its  equivalent,  per  week.  Payment  shall  be 
made  to  the  beneficiary  at  the  end  of  each  month  or  term  in  which  such 
collegiate  work  is  done,  subject  to  passing  grades  in  each  course  of  work 
pursued.  Failure  to  make  passing  grades  shall  deprive  beneficiary  of 
further  privileges  under  this  plan;  and  in  case  of  dismissal  from  his 
college  for  any  cause  all  privileges  are  forfeited,  subject  to  an  appeal  to 
the  State  Board  of  Education,  which  board  may  grant  permission  to 
enter  another  school,  subject  to  the  approval  of  such  school,  in  which 
the  beneficiary  shall  again  be  granted  the  privilege  of  this  plan. 

The  funds  for  carrying  out  this  plan  shall  be  raised  by  a  county  tax 
in  those  counties  in  which  commissioned  and  certified  high  schools  are 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


How  Should  the  Student  Body  Be  Recruited?  47 

located.  By  taxation  a  fund  shall  be  created  and  held  by  each  county 
treasurer.  Each  beneficiary  shall  be  paid  by  a  draft  drawn  by  him 
through  the  bursar  of  the  college  where  said  beneficiary  is  pursuing  his 
work,  and  such  draft  shall  be  an  order  on  the  treasurer  of  the  county 
in  which  the  beneficiary  resides  to  pay  the  amount  of  such  draft. 

The  purpose  of  this  plan,  as  thus  tentatively  outlined,  is  to  give  a 
stimulus  to  better  high  school  work,  resulting  in  a  sharper  differentia- 
tion of  those  capable  of  more  advanced  education  from  those  less  capable. 
It  aims  to  make  capacity  and  ambition  rather  than  the  accident  of  birth 
the  criterion  for  higher  education.  It  is  believed  that  it  will  result  in 
a  serious  and  purposeful  student  body  and,  in  a  few  years,  in  a  more 
enlightened,  moral  and  capable  citizenship.  To  the  exceptional  few  who 
are  capable  of  educating  themselves  under  present  existing  conditions 
this  plan  gives  an  added  stimulus,  permitting  them  to  go  farther  than 
would  otherwise  be  possible.  Finally,  it  may  be  remarked  that  the 
economic  burden  of  the  student  body  on  society  would  be  less  under  this 
plan  than  under  conditions  now  existing.  Education  of  individuals 
delected  after  the  usual  four-year  college  course  should  be  provided  for 
by  scholarships,  which  should  be  available  only  for  post-graduate  work. 

This  subject  of  financial  aid  to  students  may  not  appeal  to  you  at 
first  glance  as  a  matter  of  fundamental  importance.  But  I  wish  to 
insist  that  it  is.  Other  things  being  equal,  that  family  or  tribe  or 
nation  which  gets  for  the  family,  tribe  or  nation  the  benefit  of  what  it 
breeds  will  succeed  over  its  neighbors  or  competitors.  Biology  has  con- 
tributed one  fundamental  idea  or  concept  to  human  thought — the  idea 
of  evolution.  And  legislation  can  be  in  harmony  with  or  conform  to 
evolutionary  trends.  Education  of  the  most  fit  at  public  expense  is,  I 
believe,  such  legislation.  Such  legislation  would  tend  to  give  the  nation 
the  benefit  of  what  it  breeds,  a  condition  now  imperfectly  realized  be- 
cause our  college  students  are  largely  recruited  from  a  numerically 
inferior  portion  of  our  population. 

"Heredity  may  confer  some  advantage;  but  genius  generally  mocks 
at  heredity,  and  the  frequent  rise  by  sheer  ability  of  men  from  the 
ranks  of  manual  workers  seems  to  prove  that  brain  power  in  the  case 
of  a  fairly  homogeneous  race  exists  in  due  proportion  in  all  classes. 
The  object  of  national  education  must  be  to  provide,  so  far  as  possible, 
equal  chances  for  natural  talent  wherever  it  is  to  be  found.  Otherwise 
there  must  be  loss  of  national  efficiency.  At  the  same  time,  it  must  be 
remembered  that  marked  intellectual  power  will  always  be  the  posses- 
sion of  a  minority,  that  real  leadership  will  always  be  rare,  and  that 
training  in  all  classes  may  be  wasted  if  carried  beyond  the  inherent 
capacity  of  the  individual  boy  or  girl.  *  *  *  Of  about  600,000  chil- 
dren (in  England)  who  now  leave  the  elementary  schools  annually,  only 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


48  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

about  1  per  1,000  reaches  a  university.  This  is  far  too  low  a  propor- 
tion, and  it  indicates  the  denial  of  that  equality  of  opportunity  which 
must  be  our  ideal."* 

"We  are  not  limited,  however,  to  a  military  objective,  for  when  the 
war  is  over  the  international  competitions  of  peace  will  be  resumed. 
No  treaties  or  leag^ies  can  prevent  that,  and  it  is  not  desirable  that  they 
should,  for  no  nation  can  afford  to  be  without  the  stimulus  of  com- 
petition. 

"In  that  race  the  same  power  of  science  which  has  so  amazingly 
increased  the  productive  capacity  of  mankind  during  the  past  century 
will  be  applied  again,  and  the  prizes  of  industrial  and  commercial  leader- 
ship will  fall  to  the  nation  which  organizes  its  science  forces  most 
effectively."  * 

>  Lord  Sydenham.  Science.  N.  S.  Vol.  XLVIU.  pp.  482  and  483.  1918. 
3  Elihu  Root.  I.  c.  pp.  583  and  534. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Contributions  of  Botany  to  Military  Efficiency. 


R.  M.  HOLMAN,  Wabash  College. 


Certainly  no  science  seems,  at  first  thought,  to  be  more  remotely 
related  to  military  pursuits  than  does  the  science  which  deals  with 
plants.  In  chemistry  we  recognize  at  once  one  of  Mars'  chief  servitors; 
for  even  in  the  days  before  men  fought  with  deadly  gases,  the  products 
of  chemical  research,  leaders  in  military  affairs  were  indebted  to  the 
science  of  chemistry  for  the  development  of  more  and  more  destructive 
explosives  and  for  a  great  number  of  other  essential  though  minor  war 
materials.  In  physics,  too,  we  recog^nize  a  science  whose  contributions 
to  the  business  of  warfare  are  scarcely  to  be  enumerated.  But  so  many 
and  varied  are  the  factors  which  play  their  part  in  the  successful 
pursuit  of  modem  warfare,  and  so  extensive  are  the  applications  of  the 
sciences  today  to  practical  problems,  that  every  science  has  been  called 
upon  to  make  its  contributions  to  military  efficiency.  Thus  the  science 
of  botany  has  come  to  play  a  by  no  means  inconsiderable  part  in  the 
organization,  equipment  and  operation  of  an  army.  In  the  time  allotted 
to  me  it  would  not  be  possible  to  consider  all  the  particulars  in  which 
this  science  has  aided  directly  or  indirectly  in  the  pursuit  of  war,  but 
I  shall  call  to  your  attention  two  or  three  phases  of  botanical  work 
which  have  been  of  rather  direct  assistance. 

The  very  considerable  shortage  of  cotton  which  existed  during  the 
greater  part  of  the  w^r  period,  and  the  great  demand  for  this  material 
for  civilian  and  military  clothing  and  for  the  manufacture  of  explosives, 
suggested  late  in  1914  a  search  for  a  suitable  substitute  for  the  cotton 
so  extensively  used  in  surgical  dressings.  The  material  which  proved 
best  fitted  to  this  use  was  sphagnum  moss,  which  grows  so  abundantly 
in  peat  bogs  and  by  its  accumulation  has  built  up  very  largely  the  great 
deposits  of  peat  which  are  utilized  as  sources  of  fuel  in  some  parts  of 
the  world.  This  moss,  which  was  in  fact  employed  to  a  limited  extent 
for  surgical  dressings  in  the  Russo-Japanese  War,  has  the  two  great 
virtues  of  being  very  abundant  and  of  possessing  a  remarkable  power 
of  absorbing  liquids.  In  this  latter  respect  it  is  many  times  as  efficient  as 
cotton.  By  no  means  all  species  of  the  genus  Sphagnum  are  suitable 
for  use  in  the  preparation  of  surgical  dressings.  The  species  which  can 
be  used  for  this  purpose,  and  which  are  found  in  the  United  States, 
are:  Sphagnum  imhrioatum,  S.  pcUustre,  S,  papillosum,  and  5.  magU- 
lanieum.    These  species  are  not  found  in  the  numerous  bogs  in  the  region 


4—16668  (49) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


50  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

of  the  Great  Lakes,  but  are  restricted  to  the  bogs  of  the  North  Pacific 
and  North  Atlantic  coastal  regions.  The  recognition  of  the  numerous 
species  of  the  genus  Sphagnum  is  by  no  means  easy,  and  on  that  account 
there  has  fallen  to  the  few  botanists  of  this  country  who  are  familiar 
with  the  genus  the  task  of  supervising  the  collection  of  suitable  material 
for  the  use  of  the  Red  Cross.  The  British  War  Office,  the  Canadian 
Red  Cross,  and  the  American  Red  Cross  have  used  large  quantities  of 
sphagfnum  moss  for  the  making  of  dressings,  and  so  satisfactory  has  it 
proven  that  it  seems  likely  that,  even  in  times  of  peace,  it  will  continue 
to  be  extensively  used  for  this  purpose.^ 

In  a  symposium  on  War  Problems  in  Botany  at  the  meeting  of  the 
American  Association  for  the  Advancement  of  Science  at  Pittsburgh  in 
December,  1917,  an  appeal  was  made  by  Dr.  G.  R.  Lyman,  pathologist 
in  charge  of  the  plant  disease  survey  of  the  United  States  Department 
of  Agriculture,  for  effective  organization  of  botanists  and  correlation  of 
their  efforts  toward  the  increase  in  food  production  and  conservation  of 
food  so  essential  to  the  military  success  of  ourselves  and  our  allies.  The 
principal  practical  outgrowth  of  this  appeal  was  the  organization  at 
Pittsburgh  of  the  War  Board  of  American  Pathologists  by  the  members 
of  the  American  Phytopathological  Society  there  present  The  War 
Board  had  as  its  object  the  increase  of  the  product  of  land  already  under 
cultivation  by  means  of  emergency  plant  disease  research,  and  by  a  more 
extensive  application  of  the  measures  known  to  plant  pathologists  for 
the  reduction  of  crop  diseases;  and  the  reduction  of  the  losses  by  disease 
of  fruits,  vegetables  and  other  plant  products  in  transit  or  storage. 

In  the  pursuit  of  these  objects  a  number  of  measures  were  carried 
out  by  the  War  Board.  A  man-power  survey  was  undertaken  to  deter- 
mine what  botanists,  not  already  engaged  in  plant  pathology,  were  pre- 
pared and  willing  to  do  emergency  work  on  plant  diseases.  This  survey 
was  made  necessary  not  only  by  the  extensive  program  of  work  planned 
by  the  War  Board  but  also  by  the  large  number  of  trained  pathologists 
which  had  been  lost  for  the  time  being  to  the  science  by  reason  of 
enlistment  and  conscription. 

Estimates  were  prepared,  showing  more  accurately  than  any  previous 
estimates  had  shown,  the  losses  due  to  diseases  of  the  staple  crops  in  the 
year  1917.  These  figures  revealed  that,  in  spite  of  the  absence  of  any 
serious  epidemic  during  that  year,  the  loss  in  cereals  alone,  due  to  plant 
diseases  largely  preventable  by  already  known  methods,  was  over  four 
hundred  million  bushels;  and  that  the  control  of  two  diseases  of  wheat — 

'  For  the  facta  in  this  paragraph  the  author  is  indebted  to  the  article  entitled. 
"Sphasmum  as  a  Surj^ical  DressinK,"  by  J.  W.  Hotson.  Science,  N,  S.  Vol.  XLVIT. 
No.   1235. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Contributions  of  Botany  to  Military  Efficiency.         51 

loose  smut  and  bunt— during  that  year  would  have  resulted  in  saving 
thirty-three  million  bushels  of  that  grain.  This  might  have  been  added 
to  the  quantity  furnished  to  our  allies  in  Europe,  and  might  well  have 
been  an  important  factor  in  the  military  situation.  It  is  clear  that  these 
loss  estimates  were  important  in  the  execution  of  the  plans  of  the  War 
Board  to  reduce  these  losses  in  the  interest  of  the  armies  and  the  civilian 
populations  of  the  United  States  and  her  allies. 

Early  in  1918  conferences  were  held  in  the  six  districts  into  which 
the  country  had  been  divided  for  the  organization  of  the  emergency 
plant  disease  work.  At  these  conferences  the  plant  pathologists  of  each 
district  met  together  with  one  or  more  of  the  commissioners  of  the  War 
Emergency  Board  to  discuss  fully  and  informally  the  plant  disease 
problems  of  the  district.  Leaders  were  elected  for  the  work  on  each 
special  problem,  and  co-operation  for  the  earliest  possible  solution  of 
such  problems  was  arranged  among  the  workers  specially  interested. 

In  addition  to  the  man-power  survey,  the  crop  loss  estimates  and  the 
emergency  research  organized  at  the  district  conferences,  the  War 
Emergency  Board,  through  one  of  its  commissioners,  carried  on  a  pub- 
licity campaign  through  all  available  channels  for  the  wider  dissemi- 
nation of  information  as  to  the  importance  and  methods  of  plant  disease 
control.  Provision  was  also  made  for  the  prompt  exchange  among  path- 
ologists of  emergency  information  on  methods  of  control.  Thus  it  was 
sought,  by  means  of  mimeographed  sheets  mailed  frequently  to  all  work- 
ers, to  make  available  at  the  earliest  date  important  new  facts  which 
could  be  utilized  in  an  intensive  campaign  against  crop  diseases.  The 
delay  which  would  have  attended  publication  through  the  usual  channels 
was  thus  avoided. 

Another  department  of  the  work  was  concerned  with  the  gathering 
and  distribution  of  information  as  to  supplies  and  prices  of  the  impor- 
tant fungicides  and  spraying  machinery.  The  production  and  marketing 
of  these  most  important  agencies  of  plant  control  had  been  greatly  inter- 
fered with  by  war  conditions  in  the  industries  and  in  transportation. 

The  early  and  unexpected  termination  of  the  war  prevented  the 
activities  of  the  War  Emergency  Board  from  bearing  the  fruit  in  in- 
creased food  supply  for  the  allied  nations  which  might  have  been  ex- 
pected in  the  second  and  subsequent  years  of  its  existence.  Ten  months 
from  the  conception  of  the  plan  the  war  was  over,  and  the  possibility 
of  its  making  further  contribution  to  military  efficiency  through  adding 
to  the  food  supply  had  ceased.  This  fact,  and  the  impossibility  of  esti- 
mating the  results  secured  after  so  short  a  period  of  operation,  should 
not  prevent  us  from  recognizing  the  value  of  this  unprecedented  move- 
ment for  co-operation  in  increasing  knowledge  in  what  is  probably  the 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


52  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

most  important  field  of  applied  botany,  and  for  the  effective  application 
of  this  knowledge  to  the  problems  of  the  farmer,  the  fruit  grrower,  the 
gardener,  and  the  shipper. 

Forestry  is  another  branch  of  applied  botany  which  has  contributed 
to  the  successful  prosecution  of  the  war.  Its  contributions  have  been 
more  direct  in  their  bearing  upon  purely  military  affairs  than  have 
those  of  plant  pathology. 

Two  regiments  of  engineers  (forest)  were  organized  during  the  year 
following  our  entry  into  the  war.  Trained  foresters  largely  officered  the 
first  of  these  regiments,  and  the  second  drew  about  25  per  cent  of  its 
officers  from  the  ranks  of  professional  foresters.  The  companies  making 
up  these  regiments  were  employed  in  the  forests  of  France  in  the  felling 
of  trees,  in  the  sawing  of  timbers  and  boards  for  military  construction, 
in  hewing  ties  for  army  railroads,  and  poles  and  props  for  use  in  the 
trenches  and  elsewhere.  The  forester  officers  found  abundant  oppor- 
tunity to  utilize  their  experience  in  supervising  this  work,  for  the  French 
forests  have  in  the  past  been  managed  with  the  highest  skill  and  effi- 
ciency. It  was  necessary  that  the  work  of  the  forest  engineer  regiments 
be  carried  on  with  the  least  possible  waste,  and  with  due  regard  to  the 
future  of  the  forests  worked. 

The  entry  of  the  United  States  into  the  world  war  and  the  initiation 
of  our  ambitious  aircraft  construction  program  offered  a  great  oppor- 
tunity for  service  to  that  branch  of  forestry  which  is  concerned  with 
the  study  of  forest  products.  On  account  of  its  virtues  of  lightness, 
strength  and  elasticity,  wood  is  very  largely  employed  in  airplane  con- 
struction. Different  parts  of  the  airplane  in  the  construction  of  which 
wood  is  used  call  for  lightness,  strength  and  elasticity  in  varying  degree. 
In  the  building  up  of  the  framework  much  more  consideration  may  be 
given  to  the  matter  of  lightness  than  in  the  case  of  a  part  such  as  the 
front  of  the  fuselage,  which,  by  reason  of  the  weight  of  the  motor,  os 
subject  to  great  shock  in  landing.  Lightness  must  also  be  sacrificed  to 
strength  and  resilience  in  choosing  suitable  wood  for  the  tail  skids  and 
for  the  landing  skids  on  the  lower  planes.  Special  demands  are  also 
made  upon  the  material  employed  for  the  engine  bed.* 

The  careful  tests  upon  which  was  based  the  choice  of  the  best  woods 
for  the  purposes  mentioned  and  for  others  in  connection  with  airplane 
construction  were  made  largely  by  or  under  the  supervision  of  foresters 
trained  in  the  study  of  forest  products.  A  large  part  of  this  work  and 
of  other  work  on  forest  products  connected  with  the  airplane  program 
was  carried  out  at  the  Forest  Products  Laboratory,  Madison,  Wisconsin, 

'  The  facts  in  this  parasrraph  and  many  others  used  here  were  secured  from  an 
article  entitled,  "Our  Air  Fleet  in  the  Makingr."  by  Samuel  J.  Record.  Yale  Forestry 
School  News.  July  1.  1918. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Contributions-  of  Botany  to  Military  Efficiency,         53 

which  is  administered  by  the  Forest  Service  of  the  Department  of  Agri- 
culture in  co-operation  with  the  University  of  Wisconsin.  How  extensive 
was  this  work  may  be  judged  by  the  fact  that  on  September  1,  1918,  all 
or  part  of  ten  buildings  were  being  utilized  by  the  Forest  Products 
Laboratory  and  approximately  400  persons  were  engaged  in  its  work. 
At  that  time  75  per  cent  of  the  work  of  the  laboratory  was  concerned 
directly  with  the  airplane  problems.' 

The  great  demand  for  airplane  woods  rendered  it  impossible  to  depend 
upon  the  slow  method  of  air  drying  and  necessitated  tests  of  different 
types  of  kilns,  various  kilning  procedures,  their  suitability  for  different 
species,  and  the  effect  of  kilning  on  strengfth.  Satisfactory  kiln  drying 
^  methods  were  determined,  and  these  were  introduced  into  commercial 
kiln  drying  establishments  engaged  in  the  curing  of  airplane  stock. 
Research  was  also  undertaken  upon  the  factors  which  determine  the 
suitability  of  certain  species  for  steaming  and  bending  into  the  various 
bent  wood  parts  employed  in  airplane  construction,  as  well  as  upon  the 
best  conditions  for  bending  and  the  effects  of  bending  on  the  strength 
of  the  wood. 

A  particularly  interesting  feature  of  the  work  was  that  relating  to 
the  utilization  of  thin  plywood  for  fuselage  walls,  the  pontoons  of  flying 
boats,  and  eventually  for  the  covering  of  the  wings  themselves.  Since 
these  were  entirely  new  uses  for  laminated  wood,  tests  were  necessary 
for  the  best  species  and  for  the  best  combinations.  It  was  also  necessary 
to  test  the  efficiency  of  various  joints  and  splices,  and  the  effect  of  vibra- 
tion on  plywood  strength,  and  to  determine  the  best  methods  for  stamp- 
ing and  molding  the  new  construction  material.  By  September,  1918, 
tests  on  the  strength  of  plywoods  had  been  carried  out  with  56  series  of 
panels,  each  series  consisting  of  40  panels  and  requiring  240  tests. 
Twenty-five  species  of  wood  were  represented  in  these  56  series.  Ply- 
wood was  also  found  to  be  an  excellent  material  for  different  parts  of 
the  airplane  framework.  For  such  uses  a  core  of  yellow  poplar  with 
thin  layers  of  birch,  mahogany  or  black  walnut  was  shown  to  be  sat- 
isfactory. 

Laminated  construction  is  also  used  in  the  airplane  propeller,  al- 
though here  the  laminations  are  of  much  greater  thickness  than  in  ply- 
wood. Six  to  ten  layers  of  something  less  than  one  inch  thickness  each 
are  used  in  building  up  the  propellers.  At  the  Forest  Products  Labora- 
tory extended  studies  were  made  to  determine  what  wood  species  are 
most  suitable  for  this  very  exacting  use,  what  types  of  construction  are 
best,  and  what  conditions  of  manufacture  and  what  finish  are  most  effec- 

'  For  these  and  other  statementH  relative  lo  the  aircraft  worl<  of  the  Forest  Products 
Laboratory  the  writer  is  indebted  to  the  "Aircraft  Research  Program"  and  other  reports 
of  the  laboratory  furnished  throusrh  the  kindness  of  the  Acting  Director. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


54  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

tive  in  preventing  loss  of  balance  or  change  of  shape  under  the  strains 
of  service  and  in  varying  humidities. 

The  species  which  proved  to  best  combine  the  properties  desirable  in 
a  propeller  wood — i.e.,  relative  freedom  from  checking,  warping  and 
splitting;  good  glueing  qualities;  moderate  hardness;  and  abUity  to  be 
pierced  by  a  bullet  without  being  split  or  shattered — are  the  Central 
American  and  African  mahoganies  and  the  black  walnut.  These  arc 
used  on  combat  planes,  where  motors  of  great  power  are  employed  and 
the  demands  upon  the  propeller  are  particularly  heavy.  For  training 
planes,  however,  white  oak  (quartered),  cherry,  birch,  and  the  various 
species  known  in  the  trade  as  Philippine  mahogany  were  found  suitable 

There  fell  also  to  the  Forest  Products  Laboratory  the  task  of  train- , 
ing  many  of  the  inspectors  essential  in  the  carrying  out  of  the  airplane 
program.  It  was  necessary  for  these  men  to  inspect  material  and  parts 
after  various  steps  in  manufacture,  such  as  kilning,  glueing  and  fin- 
ishing. Some  of  them  must  also  identify  wood  species  and  discern 
defects  in  the  wood,  often  very  difficult  to  detect,  but,  if  overlooked, 
sufficient  to  cause  the  destruction  of  a  costly  machine  or  even  the  loss 
of  an  aviator's  life.  Decay,  knots  and  brittleness  or  brashiness  are  rela- 
tively easy  to  detect;  but  pitch  pockets  well  below  the  surface  are  very 
difficult  to  make  out,  as  are  also  the  so-called  heart  breaks.  The  origin 
of  the  latter  defect  is  still  somewhat  obscure,  but  it  is  probably  due  to 
injuries  to  the  tree  by  high  winds  while  still  standing,  or  to  damage 
in  felling.  In  planing,  the  fibers  are  sometimes  broken  in  such  a  way 
as  to  closely  simulate  a  heart  break,  and  thus  it  becomes  more  diflScult 
for  the  inspector  to  detect  this  source  of  weakness.  Diagonal  and  spiral 
grain  are  important  sources  of  weakness  in  airplane  stock.  Spiral  grain 
is  due  to  a  peculiar  development  of  the  tree  itself,  but  diagonal  grain  is 
due  to  mistakes  in  sawing,  a  tapering  log  being  cut  not  parallel  to  its 
outer  surface  but  to  the  center  line.  In  some  woods  the  direction  of  the 
grain  is  easily  detected,  but  in  others  it  can  be  made  out  only  with  diffi- 
culty. For  some  purposes  wood  with  a  greater  divergence  than  one  inch 
in  thirty  must  be  rejected. 

The  extensive  research  carried  out  by  the  Forest  Products  Labora- 
tory in  connection  with  the  airplane  program  which  has  been  briefly 
summarized  above  does  not  constitute  the  only  war  work  of  the  labora- 
tory. Investigations  undertaken  in  co-operation  with  the  Chemical  War- 
fare Section  of  the  War  Department  had  important  results,  the  confi- 
dential nature  of  which  prevent  their  publication.  Work  was  also  con- 
ducted bearing  on  wooden  ship  building,  gun  stock  manufacture,  and 
the  construction  of  artillery  wheels  and  various  military  vehicles.  Thus 
the  laboratory  was  called  upon  to  investigate  the  seasoning  of  the  tree- 
nails or  wooden  spikes  employed  in  large  numbers  in  fastening  parts  of 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Contributions  of  Botany  to  Military  Efficiency.         55 

wooden  ships.  For  the  turning  of  these  treenails  black  locust  is  the 
preferred  material,  but  the  supply  of  this  wood  became  so  limited  in 
certain  districts  that  it  was  necessary  to  substitute  live  oak  for  it.  The 
Emergency  Fleet  Corporation's  specifications  called  for  thoroughly  air- 
seasoned  treenails.  Stocks  of  air-seasoned  live  oak  were  soon  exhausted, 
and  in  a  number  of  the  shipbuilding  districts  green  or  incompletely  cured 
material  was  used.  As  a  result  serious  defects  in  the  ships  developed 
through  shrinkage  of  the  treenails  and  loosening  of  joints.  On  that 
account  the  services  of  the  Forest  Products  Laboratory  was  sought  and 
the  whole  situation  was  investigated  by  the  experts  of  the  laboratory. 
It  was  decided  that  the  long  time  necessary  for  air  drying  of  live  oak 
made  it  impracticable  to  insist  upon  the  Emergency  Fleet  Corporation's 
specifications  as  to  curing  of  treenail  stock.  Recommendations  were 
made  for  the  kiln  drying  of  such  stock  at  central  points  in  each  pro- 
ducing region  and  for  the  best  kiln  drying  procedure. 

Difficulties  encountered  in  the  bending  of  heavy  oak  for  the  rims  of 
artillery  wheels  were  made  the  subject  of  experiments  by  the  laboratory, 
which  resulted  in  the  development  of  satisfactory  methods.  These  were 
introduced  into  the  factories  engaged  in  this  work.  A  schedule  pre- 
pared by  the  laboratory  for  the  curing  of  walnut  blanks  for  rifle  stocks 
came  to  be  widely  used  by  the  manufacturers. 

The  molding  of  stock  for  the  construction  of  army  vehicles  of  many 
sorts  called  for  investigation  of  the  fungi  concerned  and  of  the  methods 
by  which  mold  development  might  be  prevented.  Mold  which  devel- 
oped during  the  period  between  the  felling  and  the  arrival  at  the  factory 
was  particularly  troublesome  in  the  case  of  wood  for  the  manufacture 
of  spokes.  As  a  result  of  extensive  experiments,  one  series  of  which 
involved  the  testing  of  forty-three  different  antiseptics,  means  were 
found  which  were  largely  effective  in  removing  this  trouble. 

Not  all  the  cases  have  been  here  mentioned  in  which  experts  in  forest 
products  gave  direct  aid  in  the  solution  of  problems  arising  in  the  indus- 
tries engaged  in  the  production  of  equipment,  munitions  and  ships. 
Other  branches  of  applied  botany  than  those  touched  upon  here  might 
be  cited  which  have  contributed  no  less  truly,  although  less  directly, 
perhaps,  to  that  great  complex  of  factors  which  made  for  the  success  of 
our  army.  Sufficient  has  been  said,  however,  to  indicate  that  a  by  no 
means  unimportant  place  among  the  sciences  in  the  matter  of  contri- 
butions to  military  efficiency  belongs  to  the  science  of  botany. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


36  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Geology  and  the  War. 


L.  F.  Bennett. 


The  geology  of  a  country  is  one  of  the  most  important  factors  which 
determine  the  location  of  its  cities,  its  various  industries,  its  population 
both  as  to  number  and  occupation,  its  political  aspirations  and  possibili- 
ties, and  its  relation  to  the  countries  bounding  it. 

It  is  the  geology  of  a  country  which  determines  its  natural  resources, 
and  these  have  had  a  peculiar  bearing  upon  the  recent  history  of  Ger- 
many. Very  much  of  Germany's  iron  and  coal  and  her  petroleum  and 
potash  deposits  lie  close  to  her  frontiers.  This  has  compelled  her  to 
strongly  fortify  these  frontiers,  especially  next  to  France,  and  for  this 
reason  the  giving  back  of  Alsace  and  Lorraine  to  France  will  be  a  great 
economic  blow  to  Germany. 

In  the  last  analysis  it  was  the  geological  factors  that  gave  Germany 
her  great  commercial  and  political  importance  and  which  determined 
her  plan  of  attack  upon  France  and  Russia. 

A  glance  at  the  geological  map  of  northern  France  gives  the  reason 
why  Germany  was  compelled  to  attack  France  through  Belgium  if  she 
expected  to  reach  Paris  quickly.  The  series  of  escarpments  to  the  east 
of  Paris  were  the  best  of  natural  fortifications.  Th^y  were  practically 
impossible  to  scale  when  well  protected  by  Frenchmen  and  French 
cannon.  The  immortal  Verdun,  one  of  the  gateways  into  France,  was 
made  such  by  the  steep  slopes  on  the  west  and  the  outlying  ridges  which 
could  be  easily  fortified  by  the  defending  army.  The  rocky  barriers  of 
northeastern  France  were  too  much  for  the  wonderful  military  machine 
of  Germany.  The  geological  "stars  in  their  courses"  were  marshaled 
against  the  invading  Huns  and  helped  the  gallant  French.  It  was  the 
geology  of  the  region  that  made  Paris  so  easily  protected  from  the 
invading  armies  from  the  east.  Its  geological  defenses  are  among  the 
wonderful  geological  features  of  Europe. 

In  western  Russia  the  geological  features  are  of  glacial  origin.  There 
are  numerous  lakes,  extensive  marshes  and  morainic  ridges.  The  area 
is  easily  defended  by  an  army  well  supplied  with  means  for  defense 
"The  (Germans  could  not  get  past  the  Russian  troops  so  long  as  they 
formed  heroic  fighting  units  instead  of  radical  debating  societies." 

The  retreat  of  the  Russians  was  masterful.  Their  various  positions 
were  determined  by  the  rivers,  and  the  lakes  and  marshes  formed  other 
barriers  to  their  foe. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Geology  and  the  War.  57 

The  mountain  passes  of  Galicia  were  the  only  practical  ways  into 
and  out  from  the  plains  of  Hungary  on  the  east.  The  valley  of  the 
Danube  was  a  most  effectual  barrier  for  Serbia  until  she  was  over- 
whelmed by  the  great  armies  of  the  Central  Powers.  The  numerous 
mountain  passes  of  the  Balkan  States,  large  and  small,  were  alike  help- 
ful and  harmful  in  offensive  and  defensive  warfare. 

The  engineering  feats  of  the  Italian  and  Austrian  troops  as  they 
fought  in  the  high  mountain  barriers  of  their  respective  countries  have 
won  the  admiration  of  the  world.  The  wonderful  bravery  of  these  troops 
will  ever  be  matters  for  historical  comment  like  the  defense  of  the  im- 
mortal Greeks  at  the  pass  of  Thermopylae. 

How  different  would  the  political  apd  economic  history  of  the  whole 
of  southern  Europe  have  been  had  the  area  been  a  great  plain  like  much 
of  Russia  instead  of  the  series  of  almost  impassable  mountain  ridges. 

It  has  been,  it  is  now,  and  probably  always  will  be  mainly  a  geolog- 
ical question  as  to  where  many  of  the  boundaries  between  countries  will 
be  located.  It  was  thousands  of  centuries  ago  when  the  political  history 
of  Europe  was  largely  determined.     It  was 

"When  you  were  a  tadpole  and  I  was  a  fish" 

that  the  shores  of  the  Paleozoic  seas  were  very  different  from  the  present 
shore  lines  and  thick  sediments  were  deposited  over  the  region  that  is 
now  southern  Europe,  and  it  was  much  later  that  these  sea  beds  were 
elevated  and  eroded  into  the  mountains  of  today. 

"The  violation  of  Belgian  neutrality  was  predetermined  by  events 
which  took  place  in  western  Europe  several  million  years  ago.  Long 
ages  before  man  appeared  on  the  world  stage  Nature  was  fashioning 
the  scenery  which  was  not  merely  to  serve  as  a  setting  for  the  European 
drama  but  was,  in  fact,  to  guide  the  current  of  play  into  blackest 
tragedy.  Had  the  land  of  Belgium  been  raised  a  few  hundred  feet 
higher  above  the  sea,  or  had  the  rock  layers  of  northeastern  France  not 
been  given  their  uniform  downward  slope  toward  the  west,  Germany 
would  not  have  been  tempted  to  commit  one  of  the  most  revolting  crimes 
of  history  and  Belgium  would  not  have  been  crucified  by  her  barbarous 
enemy."  * 

But  what  did  the  geologists  do  and  what  can  geologists  do  in  time 
of  war?  It  is  sure  that,  should  there  ever  be  another  great  war,  the 
geologists  would  be  a  more  important  factor  than  ever  before.  They 
will  be  among  the  first  of  our  scientists  to  be  organized  into  an  efficient 
working  corps. 

The  following  is  an  abstract  of  an  article  from  "Economic  Geology," 
July,  1918,  entitled  "The  Geologist  in  War  Times;  the  United  States 
Geological  Survey's  War  Work,"  by  Philip  S.  Smith: 

^Topography  and  Stratesry  in  the  War,  Dougrlas  Wilson  Johnson. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


58  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

"There  are  two  hundred  and  sixteen  members  of  the  Survey  in  mili- 
tary service,  one  hundred  and  fifty  of  whom  came  from  the  topograph- 
er's branch.  One  of  the  Survey  geologists  in  the  Engineer  Officers' 
Reserve  Corps  fills  an  important  scientific  post  on  General  Pershing's 
staff  that  requires  a  knowledge  of  geology.  One  of  the  Survey  topo- 
graphic engineers  was  also  assigned  to  General  Pershing's  staff,  where 
he  occupies  a  position  that  requires  special  knowledgre  of  topographic 
engineering. 

"As  soon  as  war  was  declared  every  member  of  the  Survey  who 
could  be  spared  took  up  war  emergency  work.  They  became  members 
of  various  national  committees  necessary  for  the  successful  conduct  of 
the  war.  The  geologic  branch  was  called  upon  to  supply  information 
concerning  the  mineral  resources  of  the  United  States  and  of  foreign 
countries.  A  systematic  search  of  the  United  States  has  been  made  for 
the  minerals  which  we  have  depended  upon  foreign  countries  to  supply, 
and  we  cong^ratulate  ourselves  upon  the  results  of  this  search.  Ores  of 
manganese,  chromium,  tungsten,  quicksilver  and  sulphur  have  been  most 
sought.  The  results  of  the  search  for  potash  rewarded  the  Survey 
beyond  expectations.  There  has  been  an  attempt  to  bring  consumers 
and  producers  of  supplies  closer  together. 

"Surveys  containing  topographic,  geographic  and  geologic  informa- 
tion have  been  made  of  the  several  cantonment  districts.  Different 
kinds  of  coal  have  been  carefully  investigated  at  the  request  of  the 
Secretary  of  the  Navy,  and  also  for  the  War  Minerals  Committee.  Over 
forty  skilled  topographic  engineers  have  been  sent  to  Europe.  Camera 
mapping  is  being  carefully  studied. 

"The  water  resources  of  the  Survey,  in  addition  to  performing  its 
routine  work,  has  been  called  on  to  furnish  much  special  information 
that  is  immediately  pertinent  to  the  work  of  the  War  and  Navy  De- 
partments. In  co-operation  with  the  geologic  branch,  it  furnished  data 
concerning  the  camp  water  supplies  of  all  the  border  States  except 
those  contiguous  to  Canada;  made  tests  of  the  water  and  estimates  of 
the  quantity  available  at  the  sites  of  war  industries  plants  to  be  erected 
in  the  eastern  part  of  the  country;  reported  to  the  Surgeon  (Jeneral's 
office  on  the  quality  of  the  water  at  thirty-three  cantonments  in  twenty- 
three  States;  determined  the  quantity  and  quality  of  the  ground  water 
available  at  seven  aviation  camps;  made  a  field  si-rvey  of  the  water 
conditions  along  the  Mexican  border  west  of  Nogales,  Ariz.;  made  com- 
parison of  the  quality  of  the  water  of  European  and  American  springs; 
made  recommendations  to  solve  the  problem  of  contamination  of  the 
water  supplies  of  the  Kansas  River  by  sewage  below  Camp  Funston; 
and  reported  on  available  waterpower  and  quality  of  boiler  water  at 
Yorktown,  Va. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Geology  and  the  War.  59 

""The  war  has  emphasized  the  economic  importance  of  geology  in 
every  branch  of  its  science.  It  has  done  its  work  at  home  in  the  ways 
mentioned  above,  and  on  the  battle  front  the  geologist  has  been  most 
important  in  determining  the  best  possible  places  for  camps,  hospitals 
and  the  lines  of  defense/' 

May  this  emphasis  not  be  forgotten.  May  the  United  States  Govern- 
ment be  always  willing  to  contribute  liberally  to  the  (Geological  Survey 
for  work  in  all  of  its  departments.  May  the  geologists  themselves  pursue 
all  problems  with  the  thought  not  only  of  developing  their  science  but 
to  promote  the  "general  welfare  of  the  people  of  the  United  States." 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


60  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Physiography  and  War. 


Wm.  a.  McBeth,  Terre  Haute,  Indiana  State  Normal  School. 


The  relation  of  physiography  and  war  is  clear  and  pervasive.  Most 
of  the  wars  of  history  have  had  their  causes,  have  run  their  courses 
and  have  had  their  results  determined  under  the  influence  of  geograph- 
ical environment.  Raids  were  made  into  fertile  territories  for  plunder 
or  for  permanent  possession.  Desert  and  mountainous  regions  have 
sent  out  their  hungry  hordes  to  conquest  and  pillage.  Mountains,  rivers 
and  marshes  have  furnished  favorable  lines  of  defense.  Mountain  passes, 
valley  ways  and  easy  river  crossings  have  been  sought  as  points  of 
attack.  Climatically  men  prefer  to  march,  go  into  battle,  and  carry  on 
other  activities  of  war  in  good  weather.  Winter  often  causes  long  and 
almost  complete  suspension  of  hostilities.  Heavy  rains  turn  fields  and 
roads  into  quagmires,  impede  movement  of  troops,  block  transportation 
of  munitions  and  food,  and  make  impossible  the  handling  of  heavy 
artillery,  causing  unexpected  delay,  change  of  plan,  and  possibly  disaster. 

Military  and  naval  strategy  take  into  account,  even  build  on  the 
groundwork  of  natural  features.  An  account  of  the  campaigns  of  any 
war  of  recent  times  clearly  shows  this  fact.  The  significance  of  the 
Hudson-Champlain  Valley,  with  its  nearly  continuous  line  of  water 
communication,  in  the  French  wars  and  in  the  War  of  the  Revolution, 
is  a  striking  illustration.  The  strategy  of  the  Civil  War  in  the  United 
States  centers  in  the  Allegheny  Mountain  barrier,  with  the  Ohio  River 
as  a  secondary  line  of  operations.  The  Mississippi  River,  the  Chatta- 
nooga Gap,  the  Potomac  River  as  lines  of  movement  by  either  of  the 
contending  armies  are  familiar  to  all  students  of  history.  Naval  opera- 
tions to  enforce  a  blockade  were  carried  on  along  the  Southern  coasts 
by  the  Federal  forces,  while  the  Confederates  sought  to  break  through 
and  destroy  this  sentinel  cordon. 

In  the  World  War  the  armies  of  the  Central  Powers  broke  into  and 
across  Belgium  because  the  smooth  Flanders  plain  gave  easier  entrance 
into  France  than  the  way  across  the  mountainous  frontier  between 
France  and  Germany  farther  south,  where  Verdun  withstood  shock  after 
shock  unconquered.  The  Somme,  Aisne  and  Marne  are  names  of  rivers 
flowing  west  in  France  along  which  the  invading  armies  undertook  to 
make  their  way  toward  the  channel  ports  or  Paris,  and  Amiens,  Soissons 
and  Chateau-Thierry  are  important  points  of  effective  resistance,  the 
last  a  crossing  of  the  Marne,  where  the  Huns  were  finally  stopped  and 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Physiography  and  War.  61 

faced  about  to  a  last  retreat  and  defeat.  Numerous  examples  of  the 
dependence  of  strategy  on  geographical  conditions  appear  in  all  the  other 
fields  of  operation  in  the  war,  and  volumes  on  this  aspect  of  the  subject 
might  be  written. 

The  importance  of  physiographic  knowledge  and  science  in  war  is 
suggested  by  mention  of  a  few  of  its  contributions  to  war  plans  and 
work.  Most  countries  have  war  colleges,  general  staffs,  or  other  organi- 
zations for  the  study  of  strategical  problems  and  the  development  and 
formulation  of  plans  of  attack  and  defense  in  war. 

In  our  own  country  the  leading  geographers  volunteered  their  serv- 
ices and  organized  in  the  national  capital  a  Board  of  Geographical  In- 
formation that  gave  valuable  aid  to  the  government  in  the  prosecution 
of  the  war. 

Accurate  maps,  indispensable  for  such  study  and  planning,  are  pre- 
pared with  great  detail  and  accuracy  in  many  countries.  The  Ordnance 
Survey,  large  scale  maps  of  Great  Britain  and  France,  are  marvels  and 
models  of  the  map  maker's  art.  The  relief  of  the  country,  its  streams, 
lakes,  railways,  roads,  canals,  cities,  villages  and  even  farmhouses  are 
accurately  indicated.  Outline  and  slope  are  shown  in  contours  or  shad- 
ing, height  by  figures  or  contour  intervals.  Shores  and  off-shore  waters 
are  mapped,  and  depths,  channels,  shoals,  lights  and  landings  are  indi- 
cated. Such  maps  are  useful  and  instructive  under  peaceful  as  well  as 
belligerent  conditions,  and,  strange  as  it  may  seem,  are  easily  obtain- 
able by  schools  and  the  general  public  in  and  outside  of  the  countries  in 
which  they  are  published.  That  such  maps  easily  get  into  the  hands  of 
possible  present  or  future  enemies  admits  of  no  doubt,  and  those  who 
want  them  get  them  by  means  of  indirection  or  espionage  if  not  openly. 
The  United  States  Geological  Survey  maps  and  the  maps  of  the  Coast 
and  Geodetic  Survey  and  of  the  Mississippi  Commission  are  most  excel- 
lent in  accuracy  and  execution,  and,  while  not  published  primarily  for 
military  use,  have  a  high  value  in  that  direction. 

The  army  Signal  Service  calls  to  its  aid  the  expert  meteorologist, 
who  observes  the  changes  in  the  air  and  reports  present  and  probable 
future  weather  conditions  for  the  use  of  the  various  branches  of  the 
army.  The  infantry  makes  use  of  such  information  in  timing  attacks, 
such  movements  preferably  being  made  in  fair  weather,  unless  in  case 
of  intended  surprise.  The  artillery  finds  great  advantage  in  knowing 
the  air  pressure,  the  direction  and  velocity  of  the  wind,  and  even  the 
temperature  and  humidity  conditions  of  the  atmosphere  in  finding  ranges 
in  firing. 

Weather  observations  and  predictions  are  even  more  important  in 
the  Flying  Service.  The  strength  and  direction  of  the  wind,  the  prev- 
alence of  cloud,  or  the  probability  of  fog  or  cloud,  are  great  factors  in 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


62  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

successful  flight  for  either  observation  or  combat.  London  came  to 
expect  an  air  raid  on  any  still,  clear  night,  and  the  Germans  are  re- 
ported to  have  taken  care  to  have  their  best  forecasters  select  the  most 
favorable  time  and  conditions  for  these  attacks. 

Many  engineering  problems  are  primarily  geological  or  geographical 
problems,  and  the  education  of  the  civil  or  military  engineer  includes  a 
knowledge  of  these  subjects.  The  location  of  camps,  with  the  associated 
matters  of  drainage,  of  transportation,  food  supply  and  equipment, 
require  geographical  knowledge.  The  location  of  coast  defenses,  the 
laying  out  of  military  roads,  canals  and  lines  of  defense  within  a  coun- 
try, the  improvement  of  waterways,  and  many  other  matters,  are  in 
the  field  of  the  geographer,  and  his  knowledge  and  advice  are  essential 
to  the  engineer,  whether  in  the  interests  of  war  or  of  peace. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Barberry  and  its  Relation  to  the  Stem  Rust  of 
Wheat  in  Indiana. 


F.  J.  PiPAL,  Purdue  University. 


It  has  now  been  over  250  years  since  the  European  farmers  began 
to  observe  that  the  common  barberry  bush  (Berberis  vulgaris)  had 
harmful  effects  upon  the  grain  fields,  particularly  those  of  wheat, 
through  severe  rusting  of  the  straw,  and  causing  considerable  shriveling 
of  the  grain.  As  early  as  1660  a  law  was  passed  against  it  in  the 
district  of  Rouen,  France.*  In  later  years,  as  the  barberry  was  intro- 
duced into  other  European  countries,  frequent  complaints  were  made  by 
the  farmers  that  the  bush  was  responsible  for  a  great  deal  of  injury  to 
the  grain  growing  in  its  vicinity.  One  writer  (Djorup')  remarks  in 
this  connection:  "Many  of  the  inhabitants  reaped  only  straw,  which, 
of  course,  could  not  be  thrashed."  In  many  instances  the  barberries 
were  eradicated,  either  voluntarily  or  through  force  of  law,  or  by  the 
injured  farmers  themselves.  There  was  no  consensus  of  opinion,  how- 
ever, as  to  the  guilt  or  the  innocence  of  the  barberry,  and,  as  Lind 
relates  in  his  article,  a  rather  dramatic  war  was  waged  over  the  ques- 
tion. In  1863  DeBary  finally  demonstrated,  through  cross-inoculations, 
that  one  stage  (aecial)  of  the  stem  rust  of  wheat  (Puccinia  graminis) 
passed  its  life  on  the  leaves  of  the  barberries.  Even  after  this  dis- 
covery, however,  it  was  not  agreed  that  the  barberry  was  in  any  way 
responsible  for  the  rust  infection,  and  not  until  about  thirty  years  ago 
was  this  fact  generally  accepted  by  the  botanical  profession. 

During  the  seventeenth  century  the  barberry  was  introduced  into 
America,  where  it  is  now  used  extensively  as  an  ornamental  shrub. 
It  is  of  interest  to  note  that  a  law  was  passed  against  it  in  Connecticut 
in  1726,  and  in  Massachusetts  in  1755.  It  is  doubtful,  however,  if  the 
laws  were  ever  enforced. 

Owing  to  a  lack  of  definite  information  regarding  the  extent  to  which 
the  common  barberry  and  its  purple-leaved  variety  were  responsible  for 
the  stem  rust  infection  in  this  country,  no  special  effort  was  made  here- 
tofore to  bring  about  the  eradication  of  this  shrub.  The  great  World 
War  and  the  urgent  need  of  food  presented  an  opportunity  to  bring  up 
the  question  of  the  eradication  of  the  barberry,  which,  it  was  believed, 
would  reduce  stem  rust  infection  and  save  millions  of  bushels  of  valu- 


'  J.  Lind,  Berberisbusken.  or  Berberislovcn.     Denmark,  1915. 
'  Quoted  in  Lind's  article.     See  note  >. 

(03) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


64  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 

able  grains.  The  agitation  of  this  question,  enlivened  by  the  fact  that 
a  very  severe  rust  infection  in  1916  caused  a  loss  of  over  200,000,000 
bushels  of  wheat,  resulted  in  the  present  barberry  eradication  campaign, 
comprising  the  upper  Mississippi  and  the  Western  States,  with  Montana 
as  the  western  and  Ohio  as  the  eastern  limits.  The  campaign  is  con- 
ducted by  the  Office  of  Cereal  Investigations,  of  the  United  States  De- 
partment of  Agriculture,  in  co-operation  with  the  State  Agricultural 
Colleges. 

The  barberry  has  been  introduced  into  Indiana  probably  during  the 
second  half  of  the  nineteenth  century.  Bushes  have  been  found  in  the 
State  which  the  owners  claim  to  be  over  fifty  years  old.  Most  of  the 
plantings,  however,  are  of  a  more  recent  origin.  The  barberry  scouts, 
who  made  a  careful  survey  4ast  spring  and  summer  of  the  cities  and 
larger  towns  in  the  northern  thirty-six  counties,  located  approximately 
1,500  plantings.  It  is  estimated  that  there  are  not  less  than  3,000  plant- 
ings within  the  State.  The  barberries  are  not  so  numerous  in  the  coun- 
ties south  of  the  Indianapolis  line,  especially  in  the  extreme  southern 
end  of  the  State,  where  they  are  very  rare.  Some  of  these  plantings 
were  very  extensive,  each  containing  several  hundred  bushes.  Along  the 
main  line  of  the  Pennsylvania  Railroad,  running  from  Chicago  to 
Columbus,  Ohio,  there  was  a  planting  at  nearly  every  station.  Some 
were  hedges  several  hundred  to  1,000  feet  long.  At  Valparaiso,  Ander- 
son and  other  cities  large  lots  and  even  whole  city  squares  were  sur- 
rounded by  barberry  hedges.  The  country  districts  seem  to  be  com- 
paratively free  from  barberries,  so  far  as  can  be  judged  from  general 
observations.  Several  communities  have  been  found,  however,  where 
bushes  were  growing  on  the  farms  and  playing  a  very  important  role, 
as  will  be  pointed  out  later,  in  starting  local  rust  epidemics. 

The  earliest  recorded  mention  of  wheat  rust  causing  serious  injury 
in  Indiana  is  found  in  the  annual  report  of  the  Indiana  State  Board  of 
Agriculture  for  1868,  pp.  364-365,  in  which  Professor  R.  S.  Brown,  in 
discussing  this  disease  and  its  control,  makes  this  statement:  "Culti- 
vating early  varieties  of  wheat,  and  immediately  cutting,  if  the  rust 
strikes  the  straw,  are  the  only  remedies  we  have  to  propose  for  this  evil, 
which  so  often  blasts,  in  a  night,  the  brightest  prospects  of  the  fanner." 
The  rust  collection  of  the  Department  of  Botany,  Purdue  University 
Agricultural  Experiment  Station,  contains  specimens  of  wheat  stem  rust 
from  nearly  every  section  of  the  State. 

In  1892  Dr.  Arthur'  reported  the  following  observation:  "At  one 
edge  of  a  field  of  wheat  on  the  Experiment  Station  farm  at  Lafayette, 
Indiana,  were  many  large  barberry  bushes,  forming  a  thicket  some 
twenty-five  by  fifty  feet.     The  season  was  favorable  to  the  production 

'  Proc.  Soc.  Prom.  Aflrric.  Sci.  23d  Ann.  Rep. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Barberry  and  Its  Relation  to  Stem  Rust.  65 

of  rust,  and  the  barberry  bushes  were  all  covered  with  aecidia.  By  the 
first  week  in  July  the  wheat  field  was  also  well  rusted.     *     *     *" 

The  survey  made  last  summer  in  the  northern  part  of  the  State  and 
in  a  few  districts  of  the  southern  part  showed  that  prevalence  of  the 
stem  rust  of  wheat  followed  closely  the  distribution  of  the  barberries. 
In  sections  having  large  numbers  of  barberry  buslies  there  was  a  com- 
paratively heavy  rust  infection,  while  in  sections  where  no  barberries 
were  found  little  or  no  rust  was  observed.  In  every  instance  where  a 
severe  rust  infection  was  reported  and  investigated  there  was  no  diffi- 
culty in  locating  barberry  bushes  in  the  immediate  or  near  vicinity  of 
the  damaged  $elds. 

The  following  specific  cases,  investigated  last  summer,  are  presented 
to  show  the  guilt  of  the  barberry  in  spreading  the  stem  rust  of  wheat 
in  Indiana: 

Case  1.  Franklin  County.  A  barberry  bush  was  growing  in  the 
yard  of  Ed.  Heap's  farm  near  Drewersburg.  Another  bush  was  growing 
in  the  corner  of  a  field  across  the  road  from  the  house.  Mr.  Heap's 
and  two  of  his  neighbors'  wheat  fields  were  very  heavily  rusted.  The 
grain  from  these  fields  was  refused  by  the  local  dealers  as  being  worth- 
less for  milling  purposes,  and  the  County  Agricultural  Agent  had  to 
obtain  a  special  permission  from  the  County  Food  Administrator  to 
allow  the  farmers  to  feed  this  grain  to  their  stock.  It  was  very  notice- 
able in  this  case  that  practically  all  infection  took  place  on  the  wind- 
ward side  of  the  barberries. 

Case  2.  Franklin  County.  Several  barberries  were  found  on  the 
farm  of  Bradbury  Hudson,  several  miles  from  Brookville.  Other  bushes 
are  said  to  be  growing  in  this  neighborhood.  All  wheat  in  this  com- 
munity was  reported  by  Mr.  Hudson  to  be  badly  rusted. 

Case  3.  St.  Joseph  County.  The  following  paragraph  appears  in 
the  annual  report,  for  1918,  of  the  Agricultural  County  Agent,  J.  S. 
Bordner:  "In  1915  an  urgent  request  came  from  Madison  Township  to 
come  to  the  farm  of  Jonas  Loucks,  where  an  entire  field  of  wheat  had 
been  ruined  by  some  disease.  Investigation  showed  the  most  pronounced 
attack  of  black  rust  which  the  writer  had  ever  seen.  Additional  inves- 
tigation showed  infection  in  other  fields,  but  not  as  pronounced,  because 
most  of  the  wheat  of  the  neighborhood  matured  from  four  to  ten  days 
earlier  than  this  particular  field.  Damage  from  red  and  black  rust  has 
been  found  each  season  in  this  community.  This  year  an  organized 
effort  was  made  to  locate  the  source  of  infection.  The  accompanying 
cuts  speak  for  themselves.  The  barberry  was  found  red-handed.  One 
barberry  hedge  several  rods  in  length  has  been  responsible  for  the  pres- 
ence of  rust  in  the  entire  surrounding  country,  the  actual  damage 
ranging  from  2%  to  50%,  the  field  adjoining  the  barberry  hedge  sus- 

5—16568 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zedbyLjOOgle 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


68  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 

taining  the  greatest  loss."  Infected  barberry  leaves  were  found  when 
the  field  was  inspected. 

Case  4.  St.  Joseph  County.  Mr.  Bordner  also  reports  the  following: 
''Another  striking  case  of  damage  was  found  in  the  field  of  Charles 
Bunch  near  Lakeville,  and  upon  thorough  investigation  we  found  bar- 
berry in  the  neighbor's  back  yard  some  ten  rods  away." 

Case  5.  Wayne  County.  A  few  miles  east  of  Centerville  stands  a 
country  church  with  a  cemetery  about  eighteen  rods  from  the  building. 
A  barberry  hedge  is  growing  on  both  sides  of  the  walk  leading  from 
the  church  to  the  cemetery.  Within  a  radius  of  about  one-half  of  a 
mile  from  this  hedge,  especially  on  the  windward  side,  all  wheat  fields 
were  badly  rusted.  In  the  nearest  field,  on  the  McConaha  farm,  a 
prospective  yield  of  thirty  bushels  of  wheat  to  the  acre  was  reduced  to 
less  than  ten  bushels. 

Case  6.  Wayne  County.  W.  0.  Seoney,  Boston  Township,  suffered 
considerable  losses  from  wheat  rust  for  many  years.  A  couple  of  years 
ago  the  crop  was  nearly  ruined.  Mr.  Seoney  wrote  to  the  Agricultural 
Experiment  Station  and  asked  for  a  specialist  to  examine  the  crop  and 
determine,  if  possible,  the  cause  of  the  trouble.  When  the  investigator 
found  that  the  unusually  heavy  infection  was  due  to  the  stem  rust  he 
searched  the  vicinity  for  barberry  bushes  and  found  a  large  one  twenty 
rods  from  the  wheat  field.  The  bush  was  immediately  removed.  Last 
year  Mr.  Seoney 's  wheat  was  free  from  rust  for  the  first  time  in  many 
years,  although  a  very  heavy  infection  occurred  in  another  section  of 
the  county  not  far  from  his  farm. 

Case  7.  Jasper  County.  A  barberry  hedge  was  found  on  a  farm 
two  and  a  half  miles  north  of  Rensselaer.  A  wheat  field  across  the  road 
was  heavily  rusted.     (Reported  by  W.  E.  Leer.) 

Case  8.  Rush  County.  The  stem  rust  practically  ruined  the  wheat 
crop  in  Orange  Township  on  the  farms  of  J(»s.  Brown,  John  Douthett, 
Chas.  Ov/ens  and  several  others  belonging  to  the  same  threshing  ring. 
In  one  case  the  crop  was  a  complete  loss,  as  the  grain  did  not  even  have 
any  value  as  a  stock  feed.  An  investigation  of  the  trouble  resulted  in 
locating  an  old  abandoned  nursery  on  a  farm  in  the  center  of  the  affected 
community.  Many  barberry  bushes  formerly  grew  on  this  farm,  but 
were  dug  up,  as  claimed  by  the  owner,  a  couple  of  years  ago.  A  further 
inquiry,  however,  disclosed  the  fact  that  a  number  of  bushes  were  grow- 
ing along  the  border  of  the  farm  woodlot  which  were  not  removed  until 
last  summer,  after  rust  infection  had  already  taken  place.  It  is  prob- 
able that  there  are  other  bushes  growing  wild  in  this  community  which 
have  come  up  from  seeds  scattered  by  birds. 

Case  9.  Rush  County.  Two  very  severe  cases  of  stem  rust  infec- 
tion were  found  on  the  farms  of  T.  A.  Coleman  and  Wm.  Garten,  situ- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Barberry  and  Its  Relation  to  Stem  Rust.  6^ 

ated  about  two  and  a  half  miles  northeast  of  Rushville.  A  careful 
search  of  the  community  resulted  in  locating  a  twelve-foot  hedge  of 
barberry  bushes,  most  of  which  were  over  ten  feet  high.  The  infected 
fields  were  about  three-quarters  of  a  mile  in  direct  line  of  the  prevailing 
wind  from  the  barberries. 

Case  10.  Jefferson  County.  A  barberry  hedge  and  several  group 
plantings  were  found,  late  in  the  fall,  about  one  and  a  half  miles  north- 
east of  Madison.  When  the  relation  of  the  barberry  to  the  stem  rust 
cf  wheat  was  explained  to  one  of  the  owners  she  recalled  that  a  severe 
rust  infection  occurred  last  summer  in  a  wheat  field  across  the  road 
from  the  barberries. 

Case  11.  Wabash  County.  Six  infected  barberries  were  found  on 
the  grounds  of  the  Childien's  and  Orphans'  Home,  three  miles  south  of 
Wabash.  Just  across  the  fence  from  them  was  a  wheat  field  in  which 
the  crop  was  badly  rusted.     (Reported  by  W.  E.  Leer.) 

Case  12.  An  old  planting  of  six  large  and  several  small  barberry 
bushes  was  found  on  a  farm  eight  miles  southwest  of  North  Manchester. 
The  older  bushes  were  about  fifteen  feet  high,  with  stems  several  inches 
in  diameter.  A  considerable  rust  infection  was  observed  in  wheat  fields 
in  this  community  within  a  radius  of  nearly  two  miles,  especially  in 
the  windward  direction.  A  field  of  oats  and  another  of  rye,  about  a 
quarter  of  a  mile  from  the  barberries,  were  also  heavily  rusted.  (Re- 
ported by  W.  E.  Leer.) 

Case  13.  Wabash  County.  A  severe  case  of  stem  rust  infection  was 
reported  by  Nathan  Gilbert  on  his  farm  five  miles  southwest  of  Wabash. 
Upon  investigation  it  was  found  that  numerous  barberry  bushes  covered 
a  hillside  just  across  the  road  from  the  wheat  field  in  question  (see 
Fig.  2).  The  bushes  showed  abundant  infection  of  the  aecial  stage  of 
the  rust.  The  entire  wheat  field  was  heavily  infected,  especially  within 
a  distance  of  about  100  feet  of  the  road,  where  the  grain  was  black 
with  rust.  Another  wheat  field  situated  about  three-quarters  of  a  mile 
from  the  barberries  also  had  a  considerable  infection,  but  much  less 
severe  than  the  nearer  field.  The  prospective  yield  of  the  first  field 
was  reduced  by  at  least  60  per  cent.  A  number  of  local  farmers  held 
a  meeting  at  this  field  to  see  the  havoc  wrought  by  the  barberries. 
The  guilt  of  the  bush  was  so  firmly  established  in  their  minds  that  they 
went  on  record  with  the  following  resolution: 

We,  the  undersigned  farmers  of  Wabash  County,  Indiana,  at 
a  meeting  at  the  farm  of  Nathan  Gilbert  in  Noble  Township  on 
July  19,  1918,  called  for  the  purpose  of  observing  the  ravages  of 
the  black  stem  wheat  rust  on  the  seven  teen-acre  wheat  field, 
desire  to  go  on  record  as  follows: 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


70  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

1.  We  are  fully  convinced,  after  making  these  observations, 
that  there  is  a  connection  between  the  common  barberry  and  the 
black  stem  wheat  rust.  On  the  south  side  of  this  ruined  field  is 
a  large  planting  of  common  barbeny  bushes,  which  have  been 
badly  infested  by  the  rust.  We  have  observed  that  the  rust 
started  on  the  side  of  the  field  next  to  these  bushes  and  that 
now  the  worst  infestation  is  on  the  side  nearest  the  barberries. 

2.  We  desire  to  go  on  record  as  favoring  any  legislation 
looking  toward  the  complete  eradication  of  the  common  barberry 
bush,  believing  it  to  be  of  no  value,  but  on  the  other  hand  a 
serious  menace  to  the  wheat-growing  industry. 

(Signed) 

Nathan  Gilbert.  John  Shambaugh. 

N.  L.  Gilbert.  H.  H.  Behny. 

David  Flora.  L.  R.  Miller. 

R.  D.  Flora.  W.  Curtis. 

S.  A.  Ungar.  Alvah  Dubois. 

Dan  Cooper.  Jacob  Stauffer. 

E.  E.  Stouffer.  W.  E.  Walker. 
Department  of  Botany,  Purdue   University  Agricultural  Expert' 
ment  Station,  Lafayette,  Ind, 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Evolutionary  Philosophy  and  the  German  War. 


A.  Richards,  Wabash  College. 


In  the  writings  of  the  German  intellectual  classes  during  the  early 
part  of  the  war  much  was  said  about  the  biological  justification  for  the 
conflict,  and  the  German  mind  built  up  a  biological  argument  which 
was  faultless  in  logic,  if  the  premises  be  granted.  It  is  an  argument 
which  is  readily  comprehended  in  view  of  the  historical  development  in 
Germany  of  the  Darwinian  doctrine  of  the  survival  of  the  fittest.  This 
conception  early  took  firm  hold  of  the  biological  public  of  that  country 
to  the  practical  exclusion  of  those  other  explanations  of  the  evolution 
process  that  have  held  scientific  attention  in  other  countries.  The  lead- 
ing advocates  of  the  principle  of  selection  have  been  mostly  eminent 
German  scholars,  many  of  whom  have  been  even  more  ardent  selec- 
tionists than  Darwin  himself.  Owing  to  the  stress  they  place  upon 
selection  as  a  factor  of  evolution,  they  comprise  the  school  of  Neo- 
Darwinians,  and  it  is  they  who  have  carried  Darwinism  to  the  extreme 
in  applying  it  to  the  problems  of  mankind.  Obviously  Darwin  never 
anticipated  such  an  application. 

By  selection  the  biologist  means  that  of  a  race  of  individuals  certain 
ones,  especially  desirable  on  the  basis  of  some  criterion  established  in 
the  case,  are  chosen  to  be  the  parents  of  the  next  generation;  and  of 
the  next  progeny,  those  which  show  this  same  desirable  character  are 
chosen.  In  this  way  the  domesticated  races  of  animals  and  plants  have 
been  established,  as  is  well  known  to  the  practical  breeder.  Natural 
selection,  which  Darwin  assumed  to  be  the  chief  factor  in  the  evolution 
of  species,  behaves  in  the  same  manner  that  artificial  selection  in  the 
hands  of  the  breeder  does;  that  is,  the  conditions  of  nature  establish 
the  criterion  to  which  species  must  conform,  and  those  members  of  the 
species  which  are  best  adapted  to  the  conditions  in  which  they  are  placed 
will  be  the  ones  that  survive  the  inevitable  struggle  and  give  rise  to 
the  next  generation.  Whenever  variations  arise,  however  small  in  char- 
acter they  may  be,  if  they  give  the  individual  possessing  them  any 
added  advantage  over  its  fellows,  they  will  be  perpetuated  because  of 
their  usefulness.  By  the  gradual  accumulation  of  these  small  continu- 
ous variations  the  race  is  more  and  more  adapted  to  its  surroundings, 
and  progress  in  evolution  is  made. 

In  spite  of  their  zeal  in  the  study  of  the  selection  factor,  German 
scholars  have  not  taken  a  leading  part  in  the  recent  phases  of  investi- 
gation  into   evolutionary  phenomena.     It   is   true   that  since   Darwin's 


(7\) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


72  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

original  announcement,  the  most  important  single  contribution  to  the 
understanding  of  these  processes  has  been  made  by  the  leader  of  the 
Neo-Darwinians,  Weismann.  To  him  is  due  the  conception  of  the  con- 
tinuity of  the  germ  plasm,  and  the  corrollary  from  this  that  body  char- 
acters acquired  in  a  single  generation  cannot  be  inherited.  In  other 
words,  the  germinal  substance  is  carried  from  parent  to  offspring  with- 
out interruption,  and  the  variations  which  appear  in  the  offspring  are 
not  inherited  from  the  parent  unless  they  are  of  such  a  nature  that  the 
germinal  substance  can  carry  them  on.  Thus  an  extra  finger  would  be 
inherited,  in  all  probability,  but  a  bent  one,  due  to  an  accident,  would 
not  be. .  The  importance  of  Weismannism  lies  in  this,  that  it  is  the 
foundation  for  the  studies  in  genetics  and  eugenics  which  have  occupied 
the  center  of  the  biologrical  stage  in  this  country  and  elsewhere  for  the 
last  twenty  years.  To  these  subjects  the  active  German  investigators 
of  the  present  time  have  contributed  little.  This  fact  should  not  min- 
imize the  contribution  of  Weismann,  but,  nevertheless,  it  does  serve  to 
explain  to  a  certain  degn'ee  the  lack  of  German  appreciation  of  the  other 
factors  of  evolution,  such  as  mutation,  which  are  now  known  to  be  of 
the  greatest  importance  in  producing  new  species  or  races.  German 
scholars  are  not  now  taking  an  active  part  in  the  modem  studies  of 
genetics;  rather  they  explain  most  evolutionary  phenomena  on  the  basis 
of  natural  selection,  and  the  German  national  philosophy  is  likewise 
based  upon  the  acceptance  of  natural  selection  applied  without  modifi- 
cation to  human  life  and  society. 

To  the  mind  of  most  German  biologist-philosophers,  struggle  is  the 
rule  among  all  the  different  groups  of  organisms,  human  groups  in- 
cluded. Through  all  the  ages  that  mankind  has  been  developing,  he 
owes  his  progress  to  the  same  factors  that  influence  the  evolution  of 
other  groups  of  animals  and  especially  to  the  factor  of  natural  selection. 
Selection  is  accomplished  as  the  result  of  a  bitter  struggle  for  existence 
as  ruthless  in  its  outcome  in  the  case  of  man  as  in  that  of  beetles  or 
snails  or  the  beasts  of  the  field.  It  follows  that  war  is  necessary  that 
the  best  of  the  world's  peoples  may  overcome  their  weaker  neighbors 
and  demonstrate  their  own  superiority.  The  following  paragraph  from 
Kellogg  explanatory  of  the  German  views  helps  to  set  before  us  the 
implicit  Teutonic  reliance  in  selection  and  in  the  irresistible  consequences 
of  the  struggle  for  existence. 

"This  struggle  not  only  must  go  on,  for  that  is  the  natural  law, 
but  it  should  go  on,  so  that  this  natural  law  may  work  out  in  its  cruel, 
inevitable  way  the  salvation  of  the  species.  By  its  salvation  is  meant 
its  desirable  natural  evolution.  That  human  group  which  is  in  the  most 
advanced  evolutionary  stage  as  regards  internal  organization  and  form 
of  social  relationship  is  best,  and  should,  for  the  sake  of  the  species, 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Evolutionary  Philosophy  and  the  German  War.         73 

be  preserved  at  the  expense  of  the  less  advanced,  the  less  effective.  It 
should  win  in  the  struggle  for  existence,  and  this  struggle  should  occur 
precisely  that  the  various  types  may  be  tested  and  the  best  not  only 
preserved  but  put  in  position  to  impose  its  kind  of  social  organization — 
its  Kultur — on  the  others,  or  alternately,  to  destroy  and  replace  them." 
The  so-called  biological  argument  for  the  war,  as  it  has  shaped  itself 
in  the  German  mind,  may,  I  believe,  be  formulated  in  three  propositions. 
From  these  logically  follows  a  conclusion,  if  the  premises  be  granted, 
that  abundantly  justifies  the  German  nation  in  carrying  on  the  war  for 
its  own  glory,  and  in  taking  measures  of  any  nature  whatever — no 
matter  how  horrible — which  would  make  them  dominant  over  the  rest 
of  the  world.     These  propositions  are  the  following: 

1.  In  the  evolution  of  any  group  of  organisms  natural  selection  is 
the  chief,  if  not  the  exclusive  factor  in  bringing  about  progress.  Nat- 
ural selection  is  effective  because  there  must  always  be  a  struggle,  either 
between  individuals  of  the  same  group  for  space,  food,  etc.,  or  between 
different  groups  for  favorable  living  conditions,  or  between  the  indi- 
viduals in  question  and  the  forces  of  nature,  as  climate,  flood,  etc.  In 
the  struggle  for  existence  the  individuals  best  fitted  for  the  conditions 
of  their  environment  will  be  selected  to  carry  on  the  race  and  their  char- 
acters preserved. 

2.  The  principle  of  natural  selection  is  applicable  to  the  human  race, 
to  the  nations  of  the  world,  just  as  it  is  to  groups  of  lower  animals, 
and  there  is  to  be  expected  a  struggle  for  existence  between  the  various 
nations.  War  is  the  usual  form  of  struggle,  and  it  offers  an  opportunity 
for  the  best  among  the  nations  to  come  to  the  front  at  the  expense  of 
the  other  less  fortunate  ones.  There  is  something  in  the  innate  char- 
acter of  nations  which  finally  makes  them  irreconcilable,  and  in  the  long 
run  the  principle  of  mutual  aid,  which  is  applicable  to  ameliorate  the 
struggle  within  groups,  cannot  act  to  diminish  the  realness  or  the  sever- 
ity of  the  inevitable  struggle. 

3.  The  German  nation  is  the  mightiest  and  greatest  nation  upon 
the  earth,  and  its  social  and  political  development  has  outstripped  that 
of  any  other  people.  Since  this  is  true,  anything  which  operates  to 
deprive  Germany  of  her  rightful  place  of  dominance  among  the  powers 
of  the  earth  is  wrong  and  cannot  be  allowed  to  stand.  War  is  a  worthy 
occupation  for  the  German  people,  for  it  creates  an  opening  by  which 
their  dominant  traits  are  given  the  opportunity  for  full  expression  and 
development.  The  policy  of  terrorism  is  justified,  for  it  aids  the  selected 
German  nation  to  maintain  itself  over  its  weaker  neighbors,  and  along 
with  the  natural  results  of  war,  it  serves  to  remove  the  inferior  and 
unfit  peoples  from  the  contest  and  thus  make  more  room  for  the  better 
fitted  survivors. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


74  Proceedings  of  Indiarui  Academy  of  Science. 

That  the  points  in  the  argument  for  war  are  not  overdrawn  as  here 
formulated  might  easily  be  shown  by  quotations  from  many  Grerman 
writers.  From  eminent  as  well  as  from  humble  sources  might  be  drawn 
proof  that  this  point  of  view  is  part  of  the  mental  fabric  of  that  nation. 
Many  articles  are  available  to  show  that  the  above  propositions  rep- 
resent the  average  opinion  of  the  dominant  classes,  while  from  Prussian 
sources  come  utterances  that  make  the  version  here  given  seem  woefully 
understated.  Actual  quotations  here,  however,  appear  unnecessary  in 
view  of  the  many  statements  in  newspapers,  magazines  and  authoritive 
publications  of  the  years  since  the  war  began  which  depict  plainly  the 
German  attitude. 

The  purpose  of  this  discussion  is  to  show  that  when  critically  exam- 
ined this  argument  is  not  in  every  respect  biologically  sound.  Indeed 
the  points  in  the  argument  are  only  half  truths,  and  as  such  can  not 
be  used  as  a  basis  from  which  to  draw  general  conclusions.  Not  only 
is  the  biology  of  the  present  time  set  against  war  as  an  instrument  of 
racial  progress,  but  recent  investigations  go  to  show  that,  in  some  of 
its  aspects  at  least,  war  tends  to  retard  the  development  of  the  nations 
which  pursue  it.  Biology  has  said  nothing  for  which  it  merits  the  taint 
left  upon  it  by  this  false  argument.  To  grant  the  fallacious  premises 
is  possible  only  upon  misinterpretation  of  the  facts  and  teachings  of 
nature. 

Of  the  points  advanced  in  the  supposed  biological  argument  for  war, 
the  first  is  the  all  importance  of  the  factor  of  natural  selection  in  evo- 
lution. Evidence  for  and  against  this  view  is  familiar  to  all  biologists 
and  needs  only  be  mentioned  here.  In  Darwin's  theory  of  evolution, 
natural  selection  was  indeed  the  chief  factor  by  which  progressive  de- 
velopment was  thought  to  be  accomplished;  but  he  admitted  that  there 
might  also  be  other  factors  of  importance.  Natural  selection  depends 
upon  the  usefulness  of  the  character  under  consideration;  that  is,  in 
the  struggle  for  existence  it  is  the  character  which  is  most  useful,  which 
is  best  fitted  to  the  environment  wherein  the  struggle  is  conducted,  that 
is  preserved.  Darwin  supposed  that,  as  the  small  variations  accumu- 
lated, they  gradually  fitted  the  individual  possessing  them  more  and 
more  to  its  surroundings,  and  thus  were  passed  to  the  next  generations. 
Even  the  most  minute,  the  continuous  variations  were  to  be  interpreted 
thus.  Discontinuous  variations,  by  which  offspring  markedly  different 
in  some  particular  character  are  produced,  were  recognized  occasionally 
to  occur  in  nature,  but  they  were  thought  to  be  rare  and  therefore 
insignificant.  Darwin  also  recognized  that  his  factor  fails  to  account 
for  the  perpetuation  of  minute  variations  until  they  are  sufficiently 
developed  to  be  of  importance  to  the  organism.  Natural  selection  with- 
out doubt  plays  its  part  in  the  case  of  a  useful  character.  The  white 
coat  of  the  polar  bear  renders  that  animal  inconspicuous  on  the  snow 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Evolutionary  Philosophy  and  the  German  War.         75 

fields  of  its  habitat;  but  it  is  hardly  to  be  supposed  that  the  first  patch 
of  white  hair  that  appeared  upon  the  ancestral  type  of  bear  was  per- 
petuated because  it  offered  any  great  degree  of  security  to  its  owner. 
Natural  selection  here  loses  its  force,  while  discontinuous  variations 
come  into  consideration.  It  is  now  known  that  the  discontinuous  type 
of  variations,  or  mutations  as  they  are  called,  is  less  rare  than  Darwin 
believed.  To  mutations  is  now  attributed  the  larger  share  in  the  origin 
of  races  and  species.  The  role  played  by  mutations  is  illustrated  by 
the  recent  experiments  in  the  inheritance  of  the  fruit  fly,  Drosophila. 
In  laboratory  cultures  of  these  fruit  flies  there  occur  strains  without 
eyes,  other  strains  with  vestigeal  wings  that  can  have  no  possible  use- 
fulness, as  well  as  numerous  other  strains  with  characters  widely  dif- 
ferent from  those  of  the  parent  stock.  If  they  had  arisen  in  nature 
they  would  have  been  recognized  without  question  as  distinct  sub-species 
at  least,  and  probably  as  distinct  species.  Natural  selection,  as  this  and 
other  cases  that  might  be  cited  show,  is  not  by  any  means  all-powerful 
in  producing  new  races  and  species. 

In  late  years  the  selection  problem  itself  has  been  attacked  from 
many  angles,  and  a  great  deal  of  experimental  work  has  been  done 
on  it.  The  problem  resolves  itself  into  these  questions:  Are  organisms 
indefinitely  variable,  and  by  constant  selection  can  we  hope  to  develop 
a  character  at  will,  or  can  we  carry  on  our  selection  only  to  a  certain 
point,  beyond  which  it  is  not  effective?  As  yet  no  definite  answer  has 
been  made,  and  controversy  has  divided  students  of  inheritance  into  two 
schools.  Both  agree  that  positive  results  come  from  selection,  but  one 
school  holds  that  a  limit  is  soon  reached,  after  which  selection  is  no 
longer  effective.  According  to  these  geneticists,  selection  results  in  a 
sorting  of  the  different  strains  of  which  any  organism  is  composed  into 
the  ori^nal  pure  lines.  Thus  the  bristles  numbers  on  the  thorax  of  a 
fly  may  be  selected  for  perhaps  thirty  generations  with  an  increase  in 
the  mean,  but  at  lengrth  continued  selection  causes  no  further  rise  in 
the  mean  of  the  bristles  number.  If  further  selection  is  to  be  effective 
a  new  mutation  must  occur.  Without  some  such  change  in  the  germ 
plasm  selection  cannot  be  responsible  for  continued  progressive  develop- 
ment. 

According  to  the  other  school  of  biologists,  germinal  modifications 
are  necessary  before  selection  can  bring  about  any  real  change  in  the 
organism,  but  these  germinal  changes  are  of  such  common  occurrence 
that  it  is  possible  practically  to  continue  development  by  selection  in  the 
direction  desired.  Between  these  two  widely  different  viewpoints  no 
decision  can  be  reached,  for  sufficient  experimental  evidence  is  not  at 
present  available.  Certainly  there  is  not  enough  exact  scientific  data 
to  justify  relying  solely  upon  natural  selection,  or  making  a  fetish  out 
of  the  conception  of  the  struggle  for  existence. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


76  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

'One  more  important  criticism  of  the  narrow  Darwinian  interpreta- 
tion should  be  pointed  out.  Evolutionists  in  the  last  quarter  of  a  cen- 
tury have  come  to  see  that  the  struggle  so  much  stressed  in  the  years 
immediately  following  Darwin's  life  is  by  no  means  an  unmitigated  one, 
but  that,  on  the  other  hand,  those  communities  of  animals  that  are  most 
highly  developed  are  the  ones  in  which  there  is  a  division  of  labor  and 
in  which  co-operation  takes  the  place  of  bitter  competition.  Co-operation 
results  in  community  prosperity  and  growth.  This  is  the  principle  of 
mutual  aid,  and  even  a  cursory  examination  of  the  facts  of  nature  will 
show  that  it  is  not  an  unimportant  one.  It  depends  upon  several  obser- 
vations which  may  be  easily  verified.  There  is  not  a  vast  number  of 
species  of  animals  that  lead  isolated  lives,  but  there  are  numberless 
species  that  live  in  societies  which  seem  to  have  their  raison  d^etre  in 
better  means  for  defense,  for  securing  food,  or  for  rearing  offspring. 
A  fairly  keen  competition  and  warfare  may  often  be  noted  between 
animals  which  are  members  of  different  classes  or  species,  or  even  be- 
tween different  tribes  of  the  same  species,  but  among  individuals  of  the 
same  community  or  tribe  peace  is  the  rule.  And  if  an  entire  population 
is  forced  to  struggle  against  the  unfavorable  conditions  of  drought,  flood, 
famine,  disease,  wind  or  weather,  the  survivors,  weakened  by  such  a 
contest,  can  at  best  produce  offspring  with  insufficient  vigor  to  bring 
about  the  progressive  development  of  the  species.  It  is  common  knowl- 
edge that  when  a  pestilence  of  any  kind  has  swept  an  animal  commu- 
nity, the  remnant  of  the  population  is  years  in  restoring  its  former 
numbers.  Finally  the  degree  of  development  of  any  group  of  animals 
is  measured  by  the  degree  in  which  social  life,  co-operation  for  mutual 
good,  and  division  of  labor  obtain,  with  the  corresponding  avoidance  of 
severe  competition.  The  social  species  prosper,  while  many  of  the  un- 
social ones  tend  toward  decay.  The  principle  of  mutual  aid  presents 
another  aspect  of  the  story  of  development  in  the  animal  world  which 
must  not  be  overlooked,  and  shows  that  struggle  is  not  in  every  case 
the  chief  characteristic  of  progress.  This  principle  doubtless  does  not 
deserve  the  rank  of  the  chief  factor  in  evolution  given  it  by  Kropotkin, 
one  of  its  proponents;  but  neither  does  the  struggle  for  existence  deserve 
the  prominence  which  the  German  Neo-Darwinians  have  given  it.  The 
isolated  species  of  animals  struggling  against  his  kin,  his  neighbors  and 
his  physical  environment  cannot  longer  be  looked  to  for  the  entire  cause 
of  progressive  evolution;  rather  we  must  look  to  both  the  social  and 
unsocial,  and  remember  that  probably  no  single  factor  is  broad  enough 
to  account  for  all  the  complexities  of  animal  development. 

These  objections  to  and  arguments  against  the  Darwinian  factor  of 
natural  selection,  and  especially  the  narrow  Neo-Darwinian  interpreta- 
tion of  it,  constitute  abundant  reasons  why  it  cannot  be  accorded  the 
chief,  the  all-important  place  in  the  progressive  development  of  animals. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Evolutionary  Philosophy  and  the  German  War.         77 

They  do  not  in  any  way  constitute  a  denial  that  progressive  develop- 
ment takes  place,  for  that  is  a  matter  of  common  observation,  but  they 
do  deny  that  natural  selection  is  the  all-powerful  causal  factor  in  bring- 
ing about  that  development. 

The  second  point  of  the  German  war-biologists  is  that  natural  selec- 
tion is  applicable  to  the  human  race  and  the  nations  of  the  world  just 
as  it  is  to  the  lower  animals.  It  must  be  admitted  without  question  that 
there  is  a  tendency  for  mankind  to  follow  the  same  natural  laws  that 
the  lower  forms  of  life  do,  but  this  tendency  is  very  often  modified. 
Man  does  not  owe  his  development  to  any  one  factor  exclusively,  whether 
it  be  natural  selection  or  any  other.  Man  differs  from  the  lower  animals 
in  the  degree  to  which  the  particular  factor  in  question  is  applicable  in 
his  evolution.  Most  animals  are  forced  to  adapt  their  mode  of  life  to 
the  conditions  in  which  they  live,  but  man  can  by  his  superior  intelli- 
gence and  ability  adapt  the  environment  to  his  own  needs.  He  has 
ameliorated  the  severity  of  the  struggle  with  clim&te  and  other  physical 
forces  not  by  growing  heavy  fur  or  seeking  caves,  but  by  taking  the 
skins  of  other  animals  or  the  product  of  the  fields  to  make  himself 
clothing,  and  by  building  shelters  which  render  him  almost  completely 
master  of  the  elements.  The  individual  whose  eyes  are  too  weak  to 
endure  a  severe  struggle  with  unfavorable  nature  or  more  vigorous 
competitors  is  not  at  a  disadvantage,  for  he,  or  rather  those  with  whom 
he  co-operates,  have  devised  lenses  by  which  the  eyes  are  strengrthened 
and  he  is  enabled  to  occupy  his  rightful  place  among  his  fellows.  The 
human  individual  is  rendered  superior  to  his  environment;  his  form  of 
adaptability  to  the  conditions  of  nature  consists  in  an  ability  to  adapt 
them  to  himself.  Furthermore,  what  is  true  of  the  individual  is  only 
true  in  a  larger  measure  of  whole  nations. 

Co-operation  is  the  keynote  in  the  life  of  mankind.  Individuals 
organize  themselves  into  communities,  even  among  the  most  primitive 
of  peoples,  and  the  communities  band  themselves  together  for  the  mu- 
tual benefit  of  all  their  members.  In  each  community  there  is  a  division 
of  labor  by  which  all  of  society  is  helped  to  a  more  successful  life.  The 
city  nations  of  the  Europe  of  the  Middle  Ages  have  given  way  to  the 
state  nations  of  the  present  time,  and  now  peaceful  and  harmonious 
dwelling  together  prevails  over  large  areas,  to  the  increasing  prosperity 
of  the  inhabitants,  where  formerly  conflict  and  warfare  was  the  rule 
between  the  subjects  of  separate  cities  or  of  neighboring  feudal  lords. 
As  allegiance  to  cities  gave  way  to  allegiance  to  states,  co-operation  was 
extended.  In  no  other  nation  was  the  principle  of  such  organization 
more  developed  than  in  Germany.  The  Germany  of  Kaiser  Wilhelm  II 
owed  its  strength  and  efficiency  to  its  organization  and  co-operation. 
German  thinkers  of  the  present  time  are  fond  of  saying  that  no  nation 
that  does  not  have  an  extremely  centralized  form  of  government  devel- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


78  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

oped  on  the  basis  of  a  strict  and  complete  organization  can  really  become 
great  and  continue  so.  This  is,  of  course,  nothing  more  than  the  prin- 
ciple of  mutual  aid  carried  to  a  nation-wide  extent.  And  if  the  life  of 
a  nation  is  made  more  effective  by  co-operation,  does  not  the  same  rule 
apply  to  neighboring  world  powers?  The  logic  that  proves  co-operation 
to  be  the  best  means  to  develop  the  people  of  a  nation  should  be  carried 
further  and  demand  the  co-operation  of  the  nations  themselves.  Ger- 
many has  not  felt  the  full  force  of  the  logic  of  its  own  situation.  There 
co-operation  has  worked  effectively  by  removing  competition  and  struggle 
from  the  inhabitants  of  an  empire  where  formerly  conflict  was  the  rule 
and  peace  the  exception.  And  this  co-operation  within  the  empire  is 
completely  at  variance  with  the  philosophy  that  regards  conflict  and 
struggle  between  nations,  the  downfall  of  one  people  and  the  exaltation 
of  another,  as  the  working  out  of  natural  law.  The  argument  that 
natural  selection  and  struggle  for  existence  must  be  applied  to  peoples 
is  most  effectively  disproven  by  the  development  and  life  of  the  German 
people  itself.  In  every  nation  the  highest  development  of  its  society  is 
based  upon  the  complete  application  of  the  principle  of  co-operation. 
And  the  highest  development  of  the  society  of  the  world  will  await  the 
co-operation  of  the  nations  which  dominate  and  control  the  world's 
destiny. 

The  final  point  in  the  arg^ument  is  the  pre-eminence  of  the  German 
people.  Very  few  will  be  found  to  admit  that  this  people  represent  the 
highest  development  of  mankind  and  are  the  best  fitted  to  rule,  for  such 
an  admission  would  imply  a  very  narrow  understanding  of  the  meaning 
of  best  fitted.  At  the  beginning  of  the  war  Germany  was  certainly  the 
best  organized  nation  for  military  purposes;  but  when  all  is  said,  mili- 
tary strength  will  never  give  any  people  the  first  rank  as  the  best 
developed  of  mankind.  Intellectually  Germany  has  stood  well  to  the 
front,  but  it  is  noteworthy  that  this  position  is  not  due  to  the  politicians 
and  soldiers  of  Prussia  but  to  the  general  interest  in  culture  and  learn- 
ing that  prevails  in  the  south  and  west  of  Germany.  Even  Prussian 
Von  Billow  remarked  that  "German  intellect  had  already  reached  its 
zenith  without  the  help  of  Prussia."  Spiritually  the  life  and  perform- 
ances of  Germany  will  not  stand  close  scrutiny.  The  misdeeds  and 
moral  corruption  of  the  jGerman  military  authorities  are  probably  the 
most  outstanding  feature  of  the  war.  Certain  it  is  that  the  life  and 
deeds  of  the  German  nation  do  not  stand  in  the  eyes  of  the  world  as 
the  finest  and  most  fitted  type  of  manhood.  No  attempt  in  the  defense 
of  this  people  can  ever  give  them  the  place  that  they  claim. 

For  all  these  reasons,  therefore,  biology  cannot  rightfully  be  charged 
with  having  furnished  a  foundation  upon  which  to  construct  a  phil- 
osophy of  war. 

November,  1918, 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


IN    MEMORIAM. 

George  D.  Timmons. 


L.  F.  Bennett. 


George  Deming  Timmons  was  bom  August  10,  1867,  in  Warren 
County,  Indiana.  He  received  his  early  education  in  the  common  schools 
of  his  county  and  in  the  Green  Hill  Seminary.  He  taught  in  the  public 
schools  from  1884  to  1895.  He  entered  Valparaiso  University  in  1895 
and  graduated  with  honors  from  the  Pharmacy  class  of  1897.  Soon 
after  graduation  he  was  appointed  Assistant  Professor  of  Chemigtry  at 
Valparaiso.  In  1909  he  was  promoted  to  the  position  of  Head  of  the 
Department  of  Chemistry,  and  in  1912  he  was  made  Dean  of  the  School 
of  Pharmacy.  During  this  time  he  did  graduate  work  in  Chemistry  in 
Chicago  University. 

Under  Mr.  Timmons'  leadership  the  School  of  Pharmacy  became  one 
of  the  most  important  and  most  completely  organized  and  best  equipped 
departments  of  the  University.  His  acquaintance  with  members  of  the 
profession,  his  activity  to  place  the  School  of  which  he  was  Dean  among 
the  most  efficient  in  the  country,  a  constant  and  conscientious  endeavor 
tD  be  loyal  to  the  best  interest  of  the  students,  the  University,  the  ethics 
of  his  chosen  work,  and  the  spirit  of  his  subject,  made  of  him  a  distinct 
personality. 

A  fellow  teacher  wrote  of  him:  "A  scholar  without  pedantry,  a 
chemist  whose  world  was  not  limited  to  chemical  theories  and  formulae, 
a  teacher  of  a  difficult  subject  who  made  it  so  attractive  that  even  dull 
students-  got  some  insight  into  its  laws  and  its  poetry,  a  worker  who 
never  knew  when  to  quit,  a  man  with  a  heart  big  enough  to  feel  the 
thrill  of  life  intensely,  its  pathos,  its  heroism,  its  incongruities — such 
he  seems  as  I  try  to  set  it  down.  Possibly,  however,  it  was  his  amazing 
vitality  and  capacity  for  work  that  used  to  impress  me  most.  So  strong 
was  this  impression  that  he  was  the  last  man  with  whom  I  should  have 
connected  the  idea  of  death.  Of  his  remarkable  gifts  as  a  teacher  I 
am  not  well  qualified  to  speak,  but  I  knew  enough  to  be  sure  that  he 
was  a  teacher  born  and  made.  He  entered  his  classroom  with  a  quick 
step  of  confidence  and  animation.  He  loved  to  teach — and  to  learn; 
and  so  it  was  that  one  would  have  sought  far  before  finding  a  more 
alert,  conscientious  or  inspiring  teacher." 

Mr.  Timmons  and  I  were  colleagues  for  twenty  years,  and  during 
all  of  this  time  we  never  had  a  single  disagreement.  I  will  always 
remember  him  for  the  many  times  he  laid  aside  his  own  work  in  order 
that  he  might  explain  to  me  a  chemical  equation  or  reaction.     He  was 


(79) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


80  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

never  too  busy  to  help  me.  I  can  recall  now  how  he  would  reach  for 
his  numerous  volumes  of  chemistry  and  would  say,  "Well  see  what" 
this  one  or  that  one  "says  on  the  subject,"  and  then  he  would  tell  me 
what  he  thought  was  the  best  explanation.  And  what  he  did  for  me 
he  did  for  many  others.  His  whole  life  was  one  of  helpfulness.  His 
greatest  pleasure  seemed  to  be  to  help  his  students.  He  had  had  a  hard 
struggle  to  reach  his  present  position  and  was  very  sympathetic  toward 
one  who  was  trying  to  learn.  He  was  too  tenderhearted  for  his  own 
good.  When  he  should  have  been  resting  he  was  off  on  a  trip  with  his 
students  or  giving  them  extra  help  or  writing  a  helpful  letter  to  some- 
one who  needed  encouragement. 

He  was  never  idle  a  minute.  Between  terms  he  would  carefully 
inspect  the  laboratories  and,  if  anything  needed  fixing,  he  would  do  it 
himself  rather  than  not  have  it  ready  for  the  new  term.  His  mechanical 
skill  was  second  only  to  his  ability  as  a  teacher. 

Mr.  Timmons  was  not  only  a  chemist;  he  was  a  student  of  many 
cf  the  poets  and  prose  writers.  He  was  a  lover  of  Riley.  His  colleagues 
will  never  forget  the  address  he  gave  upon  Riley  and  his  poems.  It 
would  have  done  credit  to  a  profound  student  of  literature. 

He  was  a  member  of  the  Indiana  Academy  but  a  few  years  and  he 
never  took  an  active  part.  He  was  an  active  member  of  the  American 
Pharmaceutical  Association  and  of  the  American  Chemical  Society.  He 
was  serving  his  third  term  as  a  member  of  the  Valparaiso  City  Council 
at  the  time  of  his  death. 

Mr.  Timmons  published,  in  1914,  "Experiments  in  General  Chem- 
istry, I  and  II,"  and,  in  1917,  "Qualitative  Chemical  Analysis."  At  the 
time  of  his  death  he  was  engaged  in  gathering  data  for  a  further  pub- 
lication. 

Last  May  Mr.  Timmons  was  given  a  vacation  for  the  summer  and 
was  advised  to  take  a  much-needed  rest.  Instead,  he  took  a  position 
made  vacant  by  the  draft  in  the  offices  of  the  Eli  Lilly  Company  of 
Indianapolis.  He  died  July  18th  after  a  week's  illness  of  typhoid  fever. 
His  funeral  was  held  in  the  Auditorium  of  Valparaiso  University  and 
was  largely  attended  by  both  students  and  townspeople. 

A  local  paper  paid  the  following  tribute:  "The  death  of  Prof.  G.  D. 
Timmons  has  left  a  great  vacancy  in  the  life  of  the  city  and  the  Uni- 
versity. To  his  duties  as  alderman  he  brought  an  unflinching  loyalty 
to  the  cause  of  clean  politics  and  efficient  government.  Whatever  made 
for  progress  and  advancement  always  received  his  whole-hearted  sup- 
port and  devotion.  No  man  ever  deserved  more  justly  to  be  called 
public  spirited  in  the  best  sense.  In  his  work  at  the  University,  where 
he  was  head  of  the  Pharmacy  Department,  he  was  indefatigable.  The 
unstinted  admiration  of  all  those  who  were  in  any  way  associated  with 
him  is  a  glowing  tribute  to  his  sincerity  and  earnestness." 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


In  Memoriam.  81 

William  James  Jones,  Jr. 


S.  D.  Conner,  Purdue  University. 


William  James  Jones,  Jr.,  was  one  of  the  most  prominent  officials  in 
the  United  States  in  charge  of  fertilizer  and  feeding  stuff  inspection 
and  control.  His  opinions  were  always  given  great  weight  in  the  meet- 
ings of  the  Association  of  Official  Agricultural  Chemists,  of  which  he 
was  a  member.  As  an  official  of  the  Federal  Food  and  Drug  Depart- 
ment has  stated,  "We  regarded  him  as  a  model  of  the  efficient  food 
control  chemist."  , 

Professor  Jones  was  bom  at  Watseka,  Illinois,  December  9,  1870. 
He  studied  in  the  public  schools  of  Illinois  until  prepared  for  college. 
He  took  the  science,  course  at  Purdue  University,  graduating  with  high 
honors  in  1891.  Immediately  after  graduation  he  became  assistant  to 
Dr.  W.  E.  Stone,  then  head  of  the  Chemistry  Department.  In  1892  he 
received  the  degree  of  Master  of  Science  and  in  1893  that  of  Analytical 
Chemist.  In  1892  he  was  appointed  Assistant  State  Chemist  under 
Prof.  H-  A.  Huston.  Continuing  in  that  department,  he  was  made  Chief 
Deputy  in  1903  and  State  Chemist  in  1907,  holding  that  office  until  his 
death  on  August  31,  1917. 

Professor  Jones*  high  sense  of  honor  and  integrity,  together  with  his 
thorough  training  and  tireless  energy,  well  fitted  him  as  a  leader  against 
fraud  in  commercial  fertilizer  and  feeding  stuffs.  He  was  instrumental 
in  framing  the  Indiana  Feedings  Stuff  Control  Law  of  1907,  which  has 
proved  so  satisfactory  and  successful  that  it  has  been  used  as  a  model 
by  other  States  and  the  Federal  Department  in  framing  similar  laws. 
This  law  was  so  administered  by  Professor  Jones  that  it  has  proven  of 
vast  benefit  to  both  consumer  and  the  honest  manufacturer.  It  may 
be  safely  said  that  both  the  feed  and  fertilizer  sold  in  Indiana  are  now 
almost  universally  up  to  the  guarantees. 

His  administration  of  the  laws  under  his  charge  was  without  fear 
or  favor.  He  forced  the  condimental  stock  food  manufacturers  to  regis- 
ter and  sell  their  products  under  the  feeding  stuff  law.  This  ruling 
was  disputed  by  the  International  Stock  Food  Company,  who  fought  the 
case  through  all  the  courts  until  the  United  States  Supreme  Court 
decided  in  agreement  with  Professor  Jones*  interpretation  of  the  law. 

Professor  Jones  had  a  natural  taste  for  investigation,  and  it  is  un- 
fortunate that  his  regular  duties  prevented  him  from  giving  more  time 
to  research.     While  his  publications  of  a  research  nature  were  few,  he 


6—16568 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


82  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

was  of  great  assistance  to  his  colleagues.  His  work  on  the  Composition 
of  Maize  at  different  stages  of  its  growth,  published  in  collaboration 
with  H.  A.  Huston  in  Bulletin  175,  Purdue  Experiment  Station,  is 
recognized  as  standard. 

He  designed  the  Indiana  fertilizer  sampler,  which  has  been  adopted 
as  official  by  over  twenty  States.  It  is  recognized  as  the  most  practical 
instrument  made  for  the  accurate  sampling  of  commercial  fertilizer  and 
similar  products.  His  feed  sampler,  which  is  a  modification,  is  also 
widely  used.  He  designed  a  stirring  machine  for  the  rapid  precipitation 
of  phosphorous  and  similar  reactions.  Professor  Jones  carried  on  ex- 
tensive experiments  in  collaboration  with  Prof.  H.  A.  Huston  on  the 
action  of  fertilizers  on  sugar  beets  and  also  on  the  effect  of  potash  and 
other  fertilizers  on  peat  soil.  This  data  is  unpublished  and  it  is  to  be 
hoped  that  it  may  be  made  available  some  time. 

He  was  the  author  and  contributor  of  over  twenty  fertilizer  reports 
and  ten  feeding  stuffs  bulletins.  Besides  a  report  of  inspection,  his 
bulletins  contained  much  valuable  information  upon  the  subject  under 
consideration.  Some  of  his  compilations  of  feeding  stuff  definitions  have 
been  used  as  texts  in  college  work.  He  helped  form  the  Association  of 
American  Feed  Control  Officials  and  served  as  president  and  on  the 
executive  board  of  this  association.  He  was  a  member  of  the  American 
Chemical  Society  and  the  American  Peat  Society.  He  was  a  Fellow  of 
the  American  Association  for  the  Advancement  of  Science,  and  had  long 
been  a  member  of  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Science.  He  was  a  charter 
member  of  the  Purdue  chapter  of  Sigma  Xi. 

Dr.  W.  E.  Stone  fittingly  described  his  life  when  he  said:  "On  every 
side  he  displayed  the  highest  qualities,  as  a  man,  a  citizen,  a  public 
officer,  a  scientist,  and  an  alumnus  of  the  University.  Such  men  are 
rare.  We  shall  long  remember  his  exemplary  life  and  mourn  him  as 
a  staunch  friend  and  a  valued  associate." 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Feeble-Mindedness — The  Problem — Conditions  in 

Indiana. 


Edna  R.  Jatho,  Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Employed  on  Survey  of  Indiana  under  Indiana  Committee  on 

Mental  Defectives. 


In  the  three-fold  problem  of  Mental  Defect  we  have  Insanity,  Epi- 
lepsy and  Feeble-mindedness.  Insanity  and  epilepsy,  while  not  properly 
understood,  are  popularly  recognized  and  are  looked  upon  as  explaining 
and  excusing  social  irregularities  and  crime.  But  feeble-mindedness, 
which  includes  by  far  the  largest  proportion  of  mental  defectives,  is 
unrecognized,  misunderstood  and  condemned. 

The  feeble-minded  are  adult  children;  their  struggle  to  lead  adult 
lives  in  competition  with  their  normal  fellows  is  a  pitiful  succession  of 
social  and  economic  failures.  For  a  few  minutes  I  want  to  discuss  the 
problem  of  feeble-mindedness  from  its  psychological  basis  and  then  pro- 
ceed to  the  rehearsal  of  stories  of  real  folks — stories  that  show  how 
these  adult  children  fall  short  in  their  effort  to  take  a  proper  place  in 
community  life. 

Feeble-mindedness,  or  amentia,  is  an  absence  of  the  quality  that 
makes  for  normality.  It  is  the  place  at  which  mankind  loses  his  high 
birthright  of  reasoning  power,  and  becomes  something  less  than  the 
man  who  has  developed,  through  his  years  of  childish  growth  and  the 
struggles  of  adolescence,  that  perfect  mind  that  makes  him  the  highest 
of  all  creatures,  a  reasoning  being.  Amentia  is  a  unit  character,  and 
represents  a  level  of  mentality  lower  than  normal  in  all  its  manifesta- 
tions. It  does  away  with  the  old  "faculty"  psychology.  A  feeble-minded 
person  could  not  be  an  idiot  in  powers  of  attention  and  have  a  good 
memory;  nor  will  he  reason  well  and  perhaps  fail  to  have  imagination; 
nor  will  he  have  strong  volition  and  lack  judgment.  His  mental  pro- 
cesses will  be,  on  the  whole,  those  of  a  normal  child  of  the  age  at  which 
his  (the  feeble)  mind  reached  its  level.  In  so  far  as  any  normal  child 
will  vary  in  special  mental  aptitudes,  just  so  far  will  a  feeble-minded 
person  vary  in  ability  for  specific  kinds  of  mental  activity.  But  he  will 
in  no  point  rise  above  his  mental  level — he  will  do  no  more  in  other 
lines  than  a  normal  child  of  the  same  mental  age,  gifted  with  a  one- 
sided talent.  For  example,  a  man  of  thirty,  having  a  mentality  of  eight 
years,  may  be  a  very  good  reader.  He  has  a  peculiar  aptness  for  the 
recognition  of  symbols   and  for  stringing  them  together;   but  he  will 


(83) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


84  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

understand  no  more  than  a  normal  child  of  eight  who,  it  happens,  is 
better  at  reading  than  at  anything  else. 

Believing  with  me  that  the  mental  level  determines  the  ability  of 
the  feeble-minded  individual,  I  may  mention  in  passing  the  three  great 
levels  at  which  we  classify  subnormal  mentality.  There  is  first  and 
lowest,  the  Idiot,  who  attains  a  mental  ability  equal  to  that  of  babies 
one  and  two  years  old.  Some  idiots  can  feed  themselves  and  move  about 
as  smart  babies  do — others  cannot.  Many  idiots  of  mature  age  are  as 
helpless  and  as  dirty  as  tiny  babies.  The  Imbecile  rises  a  little  higher 
in  the  scale — he  attains  to  a  mind  like  that  of  normal  children  from 
three  up  to  eight  years  of  age.  Low-grade  imbeciles  play  a  little,  show 
interest  in  their  surroundings  and  can  make  known  their  physical  needs. 
As  we  come  higher  in  the  scale  of  imbecility  we  find  these  aments  able 
to  do  simple  routine  tasks  and  run  easy  errands.  Above  the  imbeciles 
are  the  Morons — those  whose  mental  power  resembles  that  of  children 
from  eight  up  to  twelve  years  of  age.  These  Morons  can  do  simple 
tasks  with  only  a  little  supervision — they  make  good  household  helpers 
(not  managers) — they  can  run  machinery  and  often  work  without  super- 
vision— but  they  cannot  plan.  The  difference  between  the  occupational 
ability  in  low,  middle  and  high-grade  Morons  is  almost  as  startling  as 
the  vivid  contract  between  normal  and  defective. 

Mental  level  or  "mental  age"  is  a  result  of  a  gradual  slowing  up 
and  final  and  complete  stoppage  of  mental  development.  The  limitations 
manifest  themselves  between  infancy  and  adolescence,  leaving  the  sub- 
normal individuals  at  a  mental  standstill  somewhere  between  infancy 
and  twelve  years  of  age,  while  their  bodies  go  on  with  the  passing  of 
the  years,  and  the  evolution  of  physical  phenomena  makes  them  men 
and  women  in  the  flesh  while  still  they  are  children  in  the  mind. 

For  nearly  a  year  I  have  helped  to  search  the  highways  and  towns 
of  certain  counties  of  Indiana  to  find  these  defectives.  They  have  not 
been  hard  to  find,  because  they  are  to  be  found  everywhere.  Every 
State  has  them;  no  community  escapes;  no  kind  or  amount  of  industry 
can  free  you  from  them;  no  legal  rigor  can  expel  them  (except  to  some 
other  community).  Your  State  needs  a  farm  colony — it  needs  more 
than  one — for  the  feeble-minded.  I  can  tell  you  of  one  place  in  a  beauti- 
ful town  where  you  would  have  a  colony  ready-made  by  building  a  fence 
around  the  slums.  There  is  a  section  of  about  twelve  blocks  where  in 
every  one  of  the  fifty  houses  there  is  defect  of  one  kind  or  another— 
pauperism,  syphilitic  infirmities,  and  immorality  walking  hand  in  hand 
with  feeble-mi ndedness.  Some  of  the  homes  are  clean,  some  are  too 
filthy  to  talk  about.  There  are  about  eight  family  names  represented 
in  this  community  and  they  all  belong  to  each  other  somehow.  As  one 
old  Moron  woman  said,  "Yes,  mom,  we  air  all  kin  here.     I  jest  found 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Feeble-Mindedness — Indiana.  85 

out  after  I  took  my  second  man  that  he  were  some  kind  of  a  cousin  to 
my  kids."  The  people  who  live  in  the  beautiful  homes  of  this  fine  town 
know  they  have  these  folks  in  their  back  yards,  but  they  say,  "What 
can  we  do?"  And  I  repeat  it,  "What  can  they  do?"  I  know  another 
very  beautiful  and  prosperous  town  in  Indiana  with  a  black  spot  like 
that  in  it — not  so  big,  but  one  in  which  the  problem  of  prostitution 
assumes  alarming  proportions. 

The  feeble-minded  population  of  towns  and  accessible  couijtry  dis- 
tricts shifts  with  the  tides  of  business.  In  the  woods  about  the  lakes 
and  in  the  isolation  of  river  bottoms  we  find  the  defectives  persisting, 
in  spite  of  barrenness,  starvation  and  inconvenience.  Their  wants  are 
few  and  easily  satisfied.  In  the  lake  community,  in  the  northern  part 
of  the  State,  are  found  several  groups  of  defectives  who  have  lived  in 
the  same  spot  for  two  or  three  generations.  One  such  family  contained 
sixteen  children,  three  of  whom  are  normal,  have  married  and  have 
normal  families.  Two  others  are  low-grade  Morons,  and  the  remaining 
eleven  are  idiots,  resembling  some  of  their  paternal  kinfolks,  among 
whom  idiocy  and  imbecility  were  not  uncommon.  Seven  of  these  eleven 
idiots  could  not  walk  and  none  of  them  could  talk.  Only  three  of  them 
are  now  living.  The  home  that  shelters  them  and  their  mother  was  left 
to  them  by  their  father.  It  is  a  tiny  four-room  cabin  in  the  hills,  in- 
accessible except  by  footpath.  One  room  of  this  house  has  fallen  away 
from  the  rest,  and  the  other  three  rooms  are  small  and  dark,  with  wide 
cracks  between  the  logs,  through  which  the  rain  and  snow  drifts  in  on 
their  beds. 

You  must  hear  about  a  family  living  in  the  river-bottoms  in  the 
southern  part  of  the  State.  Because  of  the  great  number  of  adult  feeble- 
minded we  were  finding  in  this  community  we  often  went  two  together, 
because  we  felt  more  sure  of  our  judgment  in  a  given  case,  when  we 
could  talk  it  over  afterwards.  The  man  who  drove  our  car  would  try 
any  kind  of  a  road;  but  half  a  mile  down  the  field  towards  this  house 
he  gave  it  up  and  walked  with  us  through  the  fields  until  a  turn  in  the 
path  took  him  out  of  sight  of  the  car,  which  he  wanted  to  watch.  Leav- 
ing him  there  to  await  our  return,  we  went  through  the  woods,  across 
a  freshly  ploughed  field,  through  a  field  of  tall  corn,  and  at  last  we 
reached  the  house  of  our  search.  We  could  never  have  found  it  had 
not  the  voices  of  the  boys  in  the  barn  guided  us  to  it.  It  was  in  the 
lowest  and  wettest  part  of  the  field,  set  like  an  ark  on  a  scarcely  dry 
mount.  The  vapor  was  so  heavy  that  it  kept  us  coughing.  Here  in 
dirt  and  disorder  lived  a  family  of  five,  all  Morons.  Twin  boys  are  of 
low  grade,  the  parents  only  middle  grade,  and  an  eighteen-year-old  girl 
a  little  brighter  than  the  others.  Their  isolation  was  as  complete  as  if 
they  were  on  another  planet.     The  mother  said  her  husband  was  not 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


86  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

strong  and  no  one  would  rent  him  a  good  farm.  This  farm  is  under 
water  two  months  in  the  flood  season,  and  in  the  winter  they  cannot 
get  out  because  of  snow.  Yet  they  never  try  to  better  themselves — they 
accept  their  condition  with  calm  indifference. 

The  broad  highway  of  town  and  open  country  has  its  fascination  for 
the  feeble-minded  just  as  it  has  for  the  rest  of  us.  I  cannot  walk  on 
the  street  at  any  time  and  fail  to  see  defectives.  But  when,  as  in 
Indiana,,  it  has  been  my  ''job''  to  hunt  for  them,  I  need  only  to  select 
my  section  of  the  town  and  then  go  into  house  after  house  and  talk 
with  them.  I  like  to  talk  with  a  Moron  mother  or  father — ^they  will 
tell  so  guilelessly  just  what  I  want  to  know:  "Katy's  baby  ain't  got  no 
father.  No,  no,  Katy  never  was  real  bright — she  didn't  learn  nothing 
in  school.  John?*  He's  fourteen  and  in  the  fourth  grade — ^he's  smarter 
than  the  others.  John  can  write  his.  name  real  nice.  The  old  man,  you 
say?  Nope.  He  can't  read.  My  first  man  could,  though,  but  not  the 
second  one.  This  man  can't  keep  no  steady  job;  he's  working  on  the 
coal  bank  now.  Henry?  Oh,  Henry's  in  school  in  Indianapolis."  I  ask, 
"Is  he  in  Plainfield?"  "Yes,  that's  the  place.  Seems  like  hell  never 
get  out.  My  least  boy,  he's  ain't  stout  and  he  has  red,  sore  eyes;  the 
teacher  can't  learn  him  nothing  'cause  he  can't  see.  My  other  big  girl, 
she's  got  red,  sore  eyes,  too "  and  so  on. 

Behind  it  and  through  it  all  I  can  read  the  old,  old  story  of  prosti- 
tution, illegitimacy,  delinquency  and  general  no-accountness  of  the  feeble 
minds  behind  it.  You  may  think  I  made  up  this  story,  but  it  is  the  story 
I  heard  from  a  gaudily  dressed  low-grade  Moron  mother,  who  did  not 
know  that  I  knew  that  she  herself  was  a  prostitute. 

'In  the  towns  and  cities  the  presence  of  the  feeble-minded  complicates 
our  social  service;  it  increases  the  number  of  accidents  and  adds  to  the 
list  of  the  unemployed.  The  school  system  is  corroded  with  the  lower 
3  per  cent  of  its  population  mentally  unfit  to  profit  by  its  teaching. 
The  administration  of  poor  relief  by  the  overseers  of  the  poor  lends 
almost  all  of  its  time  and  money  to  the  feeble-minded  of  the  township. 
I  just  had  one  township  trustee  tell  me,  with  something  like  disgust, 
that  two  of  his  many  paupers  had  married  the  only  two  paupers 
(widows)  in  a  nearby  township — thereby  clearing  one  record  and  adding 
two  families  of  feeble-minded  children  to  his  list.  Later  in  the  same 
day  the  trustee  who  had  lost  his  two  pauper  women  and  their  families 
told  me  the  same  story — but  he  thought  it  was  funny!  Poor  farms  are 
filled  with  feeble-minded  folk  who  never  did  get  along,  and  many  of 
them  entered  the  farm  between  twenty  and  forty  years  of  age  and  have 
spent  many  years  there.  I  talked  with  one  woman  in  a  county  farm 
who  had  married  four  times,  her  last  two  husbands  being  inmates  of 
the  same  poor  farm.    She  had  one  epileptic  daughter.    That  girl  is  now 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Feeble-Mindedness — Indiana.  87 

an  inmate  of  the  farm  at  twenty  years  of  age,  and  last  summer  she 
gave  birth  to  an  illegitimate  baby,  which  fortunately  died  at  birth. 

You  may  turn  your  head  as  you  will,  you  still  face  mental  defect, 
and  the  bulk  of  it  is  feeble-mindedness.  We  have  established,  as  the 
result  of  the  survey  of  ten  counties  in  Indiana,  that  2.2  per  cent  of  the 
population  is  defective.  Of  this,  1.7  per  cent  is  feeble-minded.  Much 
of  our  crime,  nearly  all  of  our  pauperism,  a  large  proportion  of  school 
failures,  practically  all  public  prostitution,  and  a  share  of  the  gamut 
of  ills  that  society  is  heir  to,  springs  from  among  the  feeble-minded. 
It  is  none  of  their  fault.  They  stumble  along  the  pathway  of  life, 
poorly  prepared  for  the  battle  they  fight.  They  are  only  grown-up 
children,  and  as  such  should  not  be  blamed,  imprisoned  or  cast  aside, 
but  sheltered,  trained  and  supervised. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


88  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


A  Method  of  Teaching  Diffusion  and  Osmosis  in  Connec- 
tion WITH  Biological  Work. 


Paul  Weatherwax,  Indiana  University. 


Osmosis  and  diffusion  are  processes  met  with  in  many  lines  of  bio- 
logical science,  and  the  problem  involved  in  an  attempt  to  make  the 
phenomena  clear,  especially  to  an  elementary  class,  is  often  a  difficult 
one.  It  is  not  proposed  to  add  here  anything  new  from  the  physical  or 
chemical  standpoint  to  the  array  of  facts  already  clustered  around  these 
subjects;  it  is  intended,  rather,  to  give  clear,  concise  definitions  of  the 
terms  and  to  present  a  method  of  teaching  the  subjects  which  has  been 
found  successful  in  connection  with  elementary  botany.  The  need  of 
such  presentation  has  been  felt  after  the  perusal  of  twenty-five  or  thirty 
text-books  on  general  botany  and  plant  physiology,  most  of  which  are 
noncommittal  or  inconsistent  with  facts  when  discussing  these  phe- 
nomena. 

When  the  name  o87nosis  was  coined,  the  process  was  little  understood 
and  many  irrelevant  considerations  were  connected  with  it.  Since  then 
the  process  has  been  found  to  be  of  much  more  general  occurrence  than 
was  at  first  supposed,  and  our  definitions  and  explanations  must  be 
generalized  to  meet  our  better  understanding  of  it.  A  brief  history  of 
the  explanations  of  diffusion  and  osmosis  that  have  been  before  biologists 
of  the  last  few  years  will  help  to  clear  up  the  situation. 

Pfeffer  looked  for  the  secret  of  osmosis  in  the  behavior  of  solutions 
of  cane  sugar,  potassium  nitrate,  etc.,  when  separated  from  the  pure 
srlvent,  usually  water,  by  membranes  of  various  kinds.  He  did  much 
to  bring  the  process  to  the  attention  of  biolog^ists,  but  he  necessarily  saw 
only  a  limited  portion  of  the  field  to  be  covered. 

Van't  Hof  attempted  to  generalize  the  problem  and  asserted  that  in 
dilute  solutions  the  dissolved  substance  behaved  approximately  as  it 
would  in  the  gaseous  form,  the  temperature  and  volume  being  the  same 
as  that  of  the  solution,  and  osmotic  pressure  being  substituted  for  gas 
pressure.  But  this  hypothesis  has  been  found  to  attempt  to  explain  too 
much  even  for  dilute  solutions  and  is  of  no  avail  at  all  in  connection 
with  more  concentrated  solutions,  which  are  also  capable  of  demonstrat- 
ing osmotic  pressure.  It  also  has  the  defect  of  not  making  sufficient 
allowance  for  membranes  that  are  not  perfectly  semipermeable. 

The  kinetic  theory  offers  an  explanation  based  upon  the  assumption 
that  certain  molecules  bombarding  a  membrane  are  able,  because  of 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


A  Method  of  Teaching  Diffusion  and  Osmosis.         89 

some  characteristic,  presumably  size,  to  make  their  way  through  even 
against  a  gi:eater  pressure  than  they  themselves  are  exerting  by  their 
motion,  while  certain  others  fail  to  penetrate  the  membrane,  even  when 
aided  by  a  difference  of  pressure.  The  most  obvious  objection  to  any 
consideration  on  this  basis  is  found  in  the  fact  that  certain  liquids  having 
large  moIe,cules — as  some  of  the  alcohols — are  able  to  pass  through  cer- 
tain membranes  more  readily  than  water. 

Kahlenberg  reports  numerous  experiments,  both  qualitative  and  quan- 
titative, to  show  the  fallacy  of  many  of  these  theories.  He  makes  no 
attempt  to  deal  with  the  subject  on  a  biological  basis,  but  his  results 
bring  us  near  a  working  explanation  for  biological  purposes.  He  at- 
tributes osmotic  pressure  to  the  relative  affinities  of  two  fluids  for  each 
other  and  for  the  separating  membrane. 

The  report  of  the  recent  symposium  of  the  Faraday  Society  on  the 
subject  of  osmotic  pressure  was  consulted  in  the  hope  that  it  would  be 
of  material  aid;  but  it  was  found  to  contain  little  that  is  tangible  or 
serviceable  from  our  standpoint.  Like  Pfeffer's  classic  works,  it  was 
found  to  contain  much  about  the  mathematics  of  osmotic  pressure  and 
little  about  the  process  of  osmosis. 

The  text-book  definitions  and  discussions  of  osmosis  and  diffusion 
have  been  based  upon  one  or  a  mixture  of  the  theories  here  outlined.  The 
prevailing  influence  of  Pfeffer's  work  is  evident  in  most  of  them,  and, 
conseqiuently,  we  see  in  them  much  about  water  and  aqueous  solutions 
of  various  densities.  Osmotic  pressure  is  too  often  emphasized  at  the 
expense  of  osmosis,  and  students  of  biology,  who  should  be  trying  to 
understand  the  nature  of  the  process  and  its  relation  to  the  plant,  are 
still  bored  by  having  to  read  books  and  listen  to  lectures  which  empha- 
size the  stupendous  pressures  exerted  in  cells;  many  a  student  finishes 
his  course  with  a  firmly  fixed  idea  that  relative  density  is  the  thing  that 
makes  the  gases  of  the  air  and  the  water  of  the  soil  enter  the  plant 
body,  and  that  density  alone  prevents  all  the  sap  of  a  plant  from  leaking 
out  through  the  root  hairs. 

By  means  of  a  condensation  and  organization  of  what  is  known  of 
the  processes  involved,  there  has  been  worked  out  a  set  of  definitions 
and  a  method  of  presenting  the  subject  which  is  believed  to  be  superior 
to  that  g^ven  in  most  text-books  of  botany  and  plant  physiology. 

The  first  step  in  the  teaching  process  is  the  well-known  experiment 
of  placing  a  crystal  of  some  colored  soluble  salt,  such  as  copper  sulphate 
or  sodium  bichromate,  in  the  bottom  of  a  tall  glass  jar  of  water  and 
watching  the  color  ascend  for  a  few  days.  The  process  is  named  dijBfu- 
sion,  and  the  student  is  encouraged  to  work  out  his  own  definition.  Dif- 
fusion is  seen  to  consist  of  the  dispersal  of  the  particles  of  one  substance 
among   the  particles  of  another  substance,   without   aid  from  external 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


90  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

sources.  It  is  also  pointed  out  that  an  energy  transformation  has  taken 
place  in  the  migration  of  the  particles  of  the  salt  upward  through  the 
water;  the  source  of  this  energy  is  in  the  chemical  affinity  between  the 
salt  and  the  water. 

The  next  step  is  to  demonstrate  the  existence  of  this  energy  in  its 
static  form.  The  ordinary  osmosis  experiment,  in  which  a  parchment 
diffusion  shell  filled  with  a  thick  sugar  syrup  is  immersed  in  a  jar  of 
water,  is  set  up.  When  the  difference  in  level  has  been  established,  the 
process  that  has  taken  place  is  named  osmosis,  and  a  definition  of  osmosis 
is  in  order.  It  is  seen  that  the  syrup  and  water  have  tended  to  diffuse 
into  each  other  through  the  membrane,  but  the  water  has  been  more 
successful  than  the  syrup  in  getting  through ;  in  other  words,  the  mem- 
brane is  more  permeable  to  the  water  than  to  the  syrup.  Osmosis  may 
be  defined,  then,  as  the  diffusion  of  two  fluids  through  a  membrane  that 
tends  to  be  semipermeable. 

It  is  necessary  to  speak  of  two  fluids,  rather  than  two  liquids,  as 
many  texts  do,  because  the  process  is  characteristic  of  gases  also  under 
proper  conditions,  and  this  phase  of  the  process  is  a  very  important  one 
in  a  biolog^ical  connection.  It  is  not  deemed  wise  to  complicate  Uie  defi- 
nition or  the  explanation  with  reference  to  the  few  cases  in  which 
osmosis  has  been  shown  to  take  place  between  a  solid  and  a  liquid. 

It  seldom,  if  ever,  happens  in  practical  work  that  the  membrane  is 
perfectly  semipermeable.  If  we  were  defining  the  ideal  process,  it  might 
be  well  to  speak  of  an  ideally  semipermeable  membrane;  but,  after  all, 
our  aim  is  to  make  the  situation  clear  to  a  student  of  biology,  and  he 
seldom  has  to  deal  with  questions  of  complete  semipermeability.  To 
define  osmosis  as  merely  diffusion  through  a  membrane,  as  some  texts 
do,  is  insufficient,  for  a  membrane  equally  permeable  to  both  fluids  would 
not  demonstrate  osmosis. 

It  will  be  noted  that  the  student  is  not  confused  by  the  introduction 
of  relative  density  into  the  definition  here  proposed.  The  density  idea 
is  a  remnant  of  the  day  when  the  full  application  of  the  process  was 
not  understood — when  combinations  of  solution  and  pure  solvent,  sepa- 
rated by  a  suitable  membrane,  constituted  practically  the  only  system 
that  had  been  thoroughly  investigated.  Now  osmosis  is  known  to  take 
place  between  numerous  combinations  of  pure  substances,  and  numerous 
examples  are  afforded  where  the  old  rule  of  density  works  the  wrong 
way. 

The  reference  to  density  is  especially  deceptive  in  certain  cases  where 
one  of  the  diffusing  substances  is  a  gas.  An  interesting  illustration  of 
this  is  afforded  by  an  experiment  often  made  to  show  the  "lifting  power 
of  evaporation."  A  thistle  tube  filled  with  water  has  a  piece  of  wet 
bladder  tied  over  the  larger  end  in  contact  with  the  water,  and  Uie  tube 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


A  Method  of  Teaching  Diffusion  and  Osmosis,         91 

is  supported  in  a  vertical  position  with  the  smaller  end  dipping  into 
mercury.  As  evaporation  removes  water  from  the  wet  membrane,  water 
from  the  tube  takes  its  place,  and  compensation  is  made  for  the  de- 
creased pressure  by  a  rise  of  mercury  into  the  lower  end  of  the  tube. 
But  this  is  really  a  demonstration  of  osmosis.  Evaporation  in  this  case 
is  merely  the  diffusion  of  water  and  air,  and  the  process  takes  place 
through  a  membrane  which  allows  water  to  pass  more  readily  than  air. 
It  will  be  noted  that  the  major  flow  is  from  water  to  air  rather  than 
from  a  less  dense  medium  to  a  more  dense. 

It  is  true  that  when  a  solution  and  the  pure  solvent  are  considered, 
density  may  sometimes  act,  both  qualitatively  and  quantitatively,  as  an 
indicator  within  certain  limits;  but  we  are  by  no  means  sure  that  it 
will  work  in  all  cases.  It  is  probably  worth  mentioning  that  most  of  the 
experimental  work  that  has  been  done  with  solutions  and  pure  solvents 
have  dealt  with  solutions  whose  density  is  greater  than  that  of  the  pure 
solvent;  but  some  combinations  are  possible  in  which  the  opposite  is  the 
case,  and  some  interesting  results  might  come  from  experiments  with 
some  of  these.  In  the  cases  where  the  comparative  density  rule  does 
work  in  determining  the  direction  of  the  major  flow  and  the  ultimate 
pressure  produced,  color  would  probably  serve  as  well  for  an  indicator 
if  a  colored  solute  were  selected  and  a  sufficiently  sensitive  method  of 
measuring  intensity  of  color  were  devised;  yet  no  one  would  think  of 
connecting  color  with  the  fundamentals  of  the  process.  Density  has 
about  the  same  relation  to  the  process  as  has  color;  chemical  affinity  is 
the  driving  force  and  the  only  consistent  indicator  of  the  qualitative  and 
quantitative  features  of  the  process. 

It  will  be  seen  that  much  depends  upon  the  nature  of  the  membrane 
through  which  the  diffusion  takes  place,  and  to  the  physical  chemist  or 
the  research  student  of  physiology  this  is  a  very  important  thing.  But 
to  the  student  of  the  elementary  aspects  of  biology,  whose  welfare  is  now 
being  considered,  the  mechanism  of  the  membrane  is  less  important  if 
he  knows  that  for  some  reason  it  tends  to  be  semipermeable.  Whether 
the  permeability  of  living  membranes  can  be  explained  on  a  purely 
physico-chemical  basis,  or  whether  we  must  still  have  recourse  to  a 
vitalistic  explanation  until  physics  and  chemistry  have  made  sufficient 
progress  to  include  these  phenomena,  is  still  an  interesting  problem  of 
research. 

It  must  be  emphasized  that,  from  the  biological  point  of  view,  the 
effort  expended  in  explaining  diffusion  and  osmosis  is  lost  if  we  fail  to 
make  clear  their  definite  application  to  problems  of  plant  and  animal 
life,  and  many  of  our  text-books  fail  to  do  this  satisfactorily.  Many 
of  the  texts  examined  make  the  assertion  or  leave  the  impression  that 
the  cell  wall  is  the  osmotic  membrane  concerned,  and  many  leave  with 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


92  Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

the  student  the  impression  that  osmosis  takes  place  only  in  root  hair? 
and  is  concerned  only  with  supplying  the  plant  with  water  and  mineral 
food.  The  student  should  be  led  to  connect  osmosis  with  his  knowledge 
of  cell  structure  and  to  see  the  general  nature  and  importance  of  the 
process.  All  the  living  matter  (protoplasm)  in  the  plant  or  animal  body 
is  disposed  in  definite  units  (cells),  whose  unity  is  determined  by  the 
plasma  membrane.  The  whole  normal  contact  of  the  cell  with  its  physio- 
logical environment — food,  water,  soil,  air,  digestive  fluids,  other  cells, 
etc. — is  defined  and  regulated,  in  so  far  as  it  is  regulated  at  all,  by 
this  membrane.  Thus,  it  is  seen  that  all  the  life  processes — respiration, 
photosynthesis,  imbibition  by  living  tissues,  transpiration,  secretion,  ex- 
cretion, etc. — which  involve  the  exchange  of  fluids  between  the  cell  and 
its  environment,  depend  upon  the  selective  influence  of  semipermeable 
membranes. 

I  take  this  opportunity  to  acknowledge  valuable  assistance  given  me 
in  the  study  of  this  problem  by  Professor  O.  W.  Brown  of  the  Depart- 
ment of  Chemistry,  Indiana  University. 

References. 

It  is  not  deemed   necessary  to   g^ive  here  a   detailed  bibliography) 
Standard  texts  will  illustrate  the  defects  pointed  out;  the  historical  side 
of  the  question  is  given  in  most  good  texts  on  physical  chemistry.    Kah- 
lenberg's  work  is  described  in  the  Journal  of  Physical  Chemistry,  Vol- 
ume 10. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Number  of  Colonies  for  a  Satisfactory  Soil  Plate. 


H.  A.  NoYES  and  G.  L.  Grounds,  Purdue  University. 


The  uniformity  between  the  number  of  colonies  developing  on  petri 
plates  carrying  equal  sized  aliquots  has  been  used  as  the  basis  for  ascer- 
taining the  number  of  colonies  satisfactory  for  one  plate.  Prucha^  said 
in  1916:  "Further  study  is  needed  to  give  sufficient  basis  for  drawing 
definite  conclusions,  but  the  results  so  far  point  to  the  conclusion  that 
the  average  of  three  plates  from  the  same  dilution  approaches,  reason- 
ably closely,  to  the  average  of  a  hundred  plates  made  from  the  same 
dilution,  when  that  average  is  between  one  and  two  hundred  colonies 
per  plate." 

The  following  points  have  served  as  the  basis  for  determining  the 
number  of  colonies  satisfactory  for  a  soil  plate:  Soil  may  be  a  medium 
for  the  growth  of  all  kinds  of  micro-organisms;  the  rate  at  which  dif- 
ferent bacteria  multiply  varies  considerably,  and  the  antagonisms  be- 
tween organisms  are  affected  by  media,  etc. 

The  plan  for  determining  the  number  of  colonies  for  a  satisfactory 
soil  plate  was:  First,  to  make  many  dilutions  and  platings  of  a  pre- 
pared soil  and  study  the  numbers  of  colonies  developing  in  three,  seven 
and  ten  days  incubation.  Second,  to  compare  the  number  of  colonies 
developing  from  the  different  dilutions  for  evidence  that  plates  from  the 
higher  bacterial  dilution  carried  one-tenth  the  number  of  colonies  of  the 
lower  dilution  when  the  lower  dilution  did  not  give  above  the  maximum 
number  of  bacteria  that  could  be  developed  into  colonies  on  the  plates. 
Third,  to  give  confirmation  of  the  conclusions  reached  by  routine  labora- 
tory data. 

Unpublished  results  (obtained  in  this  laboratory)  show  rather  con- 
clusively that  practically  all  micro-organisms  can  be  grown  on  a  simple 
media.  Differences  in  growth,  in  addition  to  being  due  to  the  virulence 
of  the  organisms  and  their  natural  characteristics,  result  from  the  media 
becoming  unfavorable  for  growth,  due  to  the  presence  of  acid  or  basic 
reacting  substances  and  specific  end  products  of  bacterial  metabolisms. 
The  importance  of  the  proper  conditions  of  aeration  cannot  be  over- 
emphasized. It  has  been  noted  that  duplicate  plates  from  pure  cultures 
often  agree  well  when  even  more  than  two  hundred  colonies  are  present 
per  plate.  Each  organism  in  a  pure  culture  multiplies  under  similar 
conditions  and  unfavorable  media  and  end  products  stop  rate  and  extent 

*  Pnicha,  M.  J.     Journal  of  Bacteriologry,  Vol.  1,  No.  1,  p.  92. 

(93) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Many  colonies  but  all  slow  growing. 
(Good  platQ.) 


Fig.  2. 


Many  colonies  of  many  character?. 
^ Doubtful  plate.) 


Fig.  3.     Poor  distribution  on  plate. 
(Tnaatisfactory  plate.) 


Fig.  4.     Few  colonies  rapid  growing  and  pooriy 

distributed. 

.  Unsatisfactory  plate.) 


Fig  5.     Few  rapidly  growing  and  well  dintributed 

coloniosi. 

((Ioo<l  plate.) 


Fig.  6.     Rapidly  growing  colooiect. 
'^     •    fulpli 


Plate  I. 


(Doubtful  plate.) 

Digitiz 


tizedbyCjOOgle 


Colonies  for  a  Satisfactory  Soil  Plate.  95 

of  growth  rather  than  stop  the  growth  of  any  individual  organism. 
With  mixed  cultures  the  media  may  be  suitable  for  the  growth  of  all 
the  organisms  present,  but  the  differences  in  rate  of  growth  and  specific 
end  products  cause  uneven  plates.     (See  Plate  I.) 

The  literature  does  not  furnish  figures  on  duplicate  and  triplicate 
platings  where  the  bacterial  dilutions  were  made  from  large  aliquots 
(10  cc.  or  more).  In  milk  it  has  been  noted  that  platings  giving  as  low 
as  forty  colonies  are  satisfactory.*  The  soil  is  so  much  more  ununiform 
than  milk  that  the  technic  worked  out  at  this  station,'  and  depending 
on  large  aliquots  for  diluting  and  plating,  was  followed. 

Experimental  Work. 

A  black  sandy  soil  was  air  dried  and  sieved  to  unify  both  the  soil 
and  its  flora.  Triplicate  platings  were  made  from  1-40,  1-400,  1-4,000, 
1—40,000  and  1-400,000  bacterial  dilutions.  Counts  were  made  after 
three,  seven  and  ten  days'  incubation  at  20*"  Centigrade.  Especial  care 
was  taken  in  handling  the  plates  to  prevent  contaminations.  The  check 
plates  were  in  most  cases  entirely  free  from  bacterial  growth  and  their 
average  has  been  deducted  from  the  figures  given.  The  results  are 
g^iven  in  Table  I. 

2  Conn,  H.  W.  Public  Health  Reports.  U.  S.  Public  Health  Service,  Vol.  30,  No.  33. 
AuKuat,   1915. 

'  Noyea,  H.  A.,  and  Voisrt,  Edwin,  in  ProceedinKS  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 
1916,   pp.   272-301. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


96 


Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


TABLE  I. 
D2crea8z»  in  Numbera  of  Bacterial  Colonies  on  Plates  with  Increasing  Length  of  Time  of  Incubation. 


Colony  numbors  between. . 

..2.900  and  3.000 

Average  Counts 

3  days 

7  days. 

10  dajTs      . 

2.905 

2.045 

1,680 

Colony  numbers  between . . 

.  .2.000  and  2.100 

2.030 

1,790 

1.610 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

..1,700  and  1.800 

1.750 

1,570 

1.003 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

.1,600  and  1.700 

1.600 

1.050 

860 

Colonv  numbers  between . . 

..1.500  and  1.600 

1,590 

1,400 

960 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

.1.400  and  l.flOO 

1.456 

1.256 

1.021 

Colony  numbers  between . . 

..1.300  and  1.400 

1.380 

1,150 

840 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

.1,200  and  1.300 

1.240 

960 

820 

l! 

Colony  numbent  between. . 

.1.100  and  1.200 

1.135 

918 

830 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

.1,000  and  1.100 

1.070 

1.010 

940 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

. .    900  and  1.000 

910 

840 

825 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

..    800  and     900 

852 

778 

677 

f,    6 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

..    600  and     700 

659 

582 

488 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

..    500  and     600 

541 

480 

440 

Colony  numbers  between . . 

..    400  and     500 

450 

409 

387 

^21 

..    300  and     400 

340 

327 

308 

A.  11 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

..    250  and     300 

279 

288 

275 

«,i 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

..    200  and     250 

222 

220 

213 

o    2 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

..    175  and     200 

195 

200 

200 

S   3 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

..    150  and     175 

163 

168 

172 

&   3 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

..    125  and     150 

129 

136 

136 

•o    I 

Col<my  numbers  between . . 

..    100  and     125 

115 

125 

128 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

. .      90  and     100 

95 

108 

109 

3   8 
'^   5 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

. .      80  and       90 

83 

91 

92 

Colony  numbers  between . . 

. .      70  and      80 

72 

80 

85 

4 

Colony  numbers  between . . 

. .      60  and       70 

65 

71 

79 

3 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

. .      50  and       60 

54 

57 

57 

7 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

. .      40  and       50 

43 

53 

55 

7 

Colony  numbers  bet-ween . . 

. .      30  and       40 

35 

44 

46 

9 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

. .      20  and       30 

22 

30 

33 

12 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

. .      10  and       20 

14 

19 

24 

6 

Colony  numbers  between. . 

0  and       10 

7 

12 

15 

The  table  shows  the  following: 

1.  Increases  in  counts  resulted  from  additional  incubations  when 

less  than  200  colonies  were  present  after  three  days'  incu- 
bation. 

2.  Whether  the  counts  increased  or  decreased,  the  counts  after 

seven  d^ys*  incubation  fall  between  the  three-  and  ten-day 
counts. 

3.  Two  hundred  or  more  colonies  gave  unreliable  results. 

4.  The  optimum  number  of  colonies  is  probably  much  nearer  100 

than  200  per  plate. 

The  ratios  between  the  number  of  colonies  developing  after  ten  days' 
incubation  of  the  1-40,000  and  1-400,000  bacterial  dilutions  of  soils 
taken  at  different  times  from  differently  cropped  areas  are  given  in 
Table  II.  In  carrying  out  the  dilutings  and  platings  the  lower  dilutions 
were  made  and  plated  before  the  higher  dilutions  were  prepared,  since 
it  is  believed  that  multiplications  of  the  organisms  have  little  effect  on 
the  higher  dilutions  under  these  conditions. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Colonies  for  a  Satisfactory  Soil  Plate. 


97 


TABLE  IT. 
Colony  Counts  on  PUtUs  of  Different  Bacterial  Dilutions  Cover  Crop  Investigations. 


Plot  Supportxnq 


Nothing 

Nov.  14,  1914 

Feb.  6,  1915 

Mar.  2,  1915 

Mar.  27,  1915 

April  15,  1915 

MUlett 

November  14. 1914. 
February  6,  1915  . . . 

March  2.  1915 

March  27,  1915 

April  15,  1915 

Soy  Beans 

November  14,  1914 . 
February  6,  1915... 

March  2,  1915 

March  27,  1915 

Aprill5,  1915 

Nothing 

November  14,  1914. 
February  6,  1915 .... 

March  2,  1915 

March  27,  1915 

April  15,  1915 

Hairy  Vetch 

November  14,  1914 . 
February  6,  1915. . . . 

March  2,  1915    

March  27,  1915 

April  15,  1915 

Winter  Rye  (Sown  early) 
November  14.  1914. 
February  6,  1915. . . . 

March  2.  1915 

March  27.  1915 

April  15,  1915 

Nothing 

November  14,  1914. 
February  6,  1915... 

March  2.  1915 

March  27,  1915 

April  15,  1915 

Winter  Rye  (Sown  late) 
November  14.  1914. 

February  6.  1915 

March  2.  1915 

March  27.  1915 

April  15,  1915 

Crimson  Clorer 

November  14,  1914. 
February  6.  1915... 

March  2,  1915 

March  27,  1915 

April  15,  1915 

7—16568 


Average  of  Triplicate  Platea. 


Dilution  1-40.000 

Dilution  1-400,000 

69.f  colonies 

8.3*  colonies 

73.0      " 

11.6 

107.2       " 

10.7*      •• 

,      62.0      " 

7.7*       " 

94.0      " 

6.0 

99.3       " 

11.3'       •• 

92.0      " 

18.6 

172.7       " 

22.7 

88.3      " 

11.4 

193.3      " 

27.0 

75.3      •• 

10.3 

125.3      " 

26.3 

1(J5.7      " 

17.0*      •• 

112.0      " 

12.0*       " 

80.0       " 

10.7 

62.3       " 

8.3 

833       " 

10.6 

82.0       " 

19.3 

113.3       " 

11.0*     •• 

145.0       " 

12.7 

109.0       " 

8.7        " 

163.0      •' 

20.6 

225.3      " 

36.7 

175.0      " 

16.0»       •• 

185.7       " 

29.3 

122.0       •' 

8.7 

226.0       " 

31.6 

245.5       •' 

13.7 

114  3       " 

16.0 

200.0       " 

27.6 

65.3       •• 

9.7 

129.7       •• 

22.0 

173.7       •' 

13.3 

72.3       •' 

6.7*       •• 

110.3       " 

15.0 

70.0      " 

7.0*      •• 

68.7       " 

14.0 

145.0      " 

16.3 

127.0       " 

15.7 

167.0       " 

27.3 

44.7       " 

3.3*       " 

91.0      " 

15.6 

254.3       " 

23.3 

46.0       " 

6.7 

122.2       " 

16.7 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


98 


Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


TABLE  II— Continued. 
Colony  CounU  on  Plates  of  Different  Bacterial  Dilutions  Cover  Crop  Invealigaliona. 


Fun  SuppoRTiNa 


Average  of  Triplicate  Plates. 


Dilution  1-40,000        DUutJon  1-400,000 


Nothing 

November  14.  1014 

February  6,  1916 

March  2,  1915 

March  27. 1916 

April  16,  1916 

Buckwheat 

Novembers,  1914 

February  6,  1915 

March  2.  1916 

March  27, 1915 

April  16,  1916 

Natural  Growth  of  Weeda 

November  14.  1914 

February  6. 1915 

March  2,  1915 

March  27,  1916 

April  16, 1915 

Average  of  all  60  oompariaons 
Average  of  15  oomporiMnis*. . 


62.0 
93.0 
181.0 
43.0 
96.0 


6.3» 
17.3 
13.3 
3.0» 
9.7 


60.0 
121.3 
163.0 

86.0 
119.7 


10.3 
21.3 
15.0* 
6.4 
14.0 


54.7 
100.3 
152.5 

82.3 
108.0 


S.7* 
23.3 
33.6 
11.0 
13.7 


117.16 
94.4 


14.8 
9.4 


These  results  show: 


The  ratio  between  the  number  of  colonies  on  plates  from  the 
1-40,000  and  1-400,000  bacterial  dilutions  is  dependent  on 
the  number  of  organisms  present  rather  than  on  the  crop- 
ping system  or  the  time  of  the  year  the  soil  samples  were 
taken. 
The  averages  show: 

(a)    That  the  average  of  all  comparisons  for  the  1-40,000 

bacterial   dilutions   was   too   great   for   satisfactory 

plates. 
(6)    That  the  results  from  the  two  dilutions  tend  to  check 

when  the  number  of  colonies  on  the  plates  from  the 

1-40,000  bacterial  dilutions  is  under  100. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Colonies  for  a  Satisfactory  Soil  Plate. 


99 


Table  III  has  been  compiled  to  show  the  ratios  between  the  counts  of 
the  two  dilutions  when  the  number  of  colonies  developing  on  the  1-40,000 
bacterial  dilution  is  under  100.  These  results  are  the  cases  where  the 
counts  from  twenty-four  soil  samples  averaged  under  100  on  the  1-40,000 
bacterial  dilution. 


TABLE  III. 

Colonies  on  t-40,000  and  1-400,000  Bacterial  Dilutions. 
(Count*  on  1-40,000  Bacterial  Dilutions  between  47  and  100.) 


l-40,000** 

1-400,000 

94.5 

12.0 

91.7 

12.3 

88.0 

13.5 

88.0 

11.0 

86.3 

9.0* 

80.3 

7.8* 

74.0 

8.0* 

65.3 

8.0* 

65.0 

5.3' 

56.0 

7.0* 

51.0 

4.0* 

48.0 

5.0* 

47.0 

5.3* 

Average  all  71.9 

8.3 

Average*    63.6 

6.6 

**Coimt8  are  averages  of  triplicate  plates. 

*The0e  numbers  multiplied  by  10  are  within  15  of  the  numbers  obtained  in  the  lower  bacterial 
dilution. 

Table  III  brings  out  that,  while  100  colonies  per  plate  are  quite 
satisfactory,  the  10  to  1  ratio  is  more  nearly  approximated  when  much 
less  than  100  colonies  were  present  per  plate. 

To  further  substantiate  the  evidence  that  results  are  reliable  when 
relatively  small  numbers  of  colonies  are  present  per  plate,  the  ten-day 
counts  from  the  1-40,000  and  1-400,000  bacterial  dilutions  of  a  sandy 
soil,  low  in  organic  matter,  are  given  in  Table  IV. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Colonies  for  a  Satisfactory  Soil  Plate. 


101 


TABLE  IV. 

Colonies  on  1-40,000  and  t-J^OOfiOO  Bacterial  DUutiona. 
(Coloniea  on  1-40,000  Dilutiona  number  under  90.) 


DILXmONS 


1-40,000 

MOO.OOO 

29.0 

3.3* 

•• 

26.7 

2.3* 

26.0 

3.0» 

25.3 

3.0* 

24.7 

2.0* 

•• 

23.0 

3.0* 

22.3 

2.1* 

20.7 

3.3* 

20.7 

2.0* 

ft 

20.3 

3.0* 

20.0 

3.0* 

10.0 

3.0» 

17.7 

2.0* 

•• 

17.3 

1.7* 

•« 

16.0 

3.0* 

16.0 

2.3* 

•• 

13.0 

2.0* 

•• 

11.7 

2.0* 

11.3 

3.3* 

11.0 

l.O* 

•• 

10.0 

2  0* 

Averaiceofall  19.1 

2.5 

Average  of*      19.5 

2.5 

Averageof**21.0 

2.2 

All  figures  are  averages  of  triplicate  plates. 

*CouDt8  for  1-400,000  dilution  are  within  1.5  colonies  of  0.1  of  number  on  1-40,000  dilution. 

*  **Counts  for  1-400.000  dilution  are  within  0.7  colonies  of  0.1  number  on  1  40,000  dilution. 

Summary. 

1.  These  and  other  tests  (of  which  these  are  representative)  have 
shown  that  thirty  is  near  the  optimum  number  of  colonies  for  a  petri 
plate  100  mm.  in  diameter.     Plate  II. 

2.  The  averages  of  a  sufficient  number  of  plates  carrying  between 
10  and  100  colonies  are  satisfactory  for  computing  bacterial  numbers. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


102        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


The  Length  op  Time  to  Incubate  Petri  Plates. 


H.  A.  NOYES,  Edwin  Voigt  and  J.  D.  Luckett,  Purdue  University. 


Investigations  of  the  steps  entering  into  the  plate  method  for  the 
enumeration  of  the  number  of  bacteria  present  in  soil  are  few.  So  little 
agreement  was  observed  in  the  procedures  followed  in  different  soil  bac- 
teriology laboratories  that  investigations  were  undertaken  in  this  station 
to  develop  a  reasonably  accurate  technic  for  the  bacteriological  exam> 
ination  of  soils.^  The  present  paper  gives  data  in  support  of  the  ten-day 
period  of  incubation  at  20*  C.  for  soil  plates.  The  work  was  done  jointly 
with  that  on  methods  of  sampling  soil  for  bacteriological  analysis'  and 
the  number  of  colonies  satisfactory  for  a  petri  plate.*  Among  the  soil 
factors  considered  in  connection  with  the  length  of  time  to  incubate 
plates  were  the  kind  of  soil,  the  nature  of  its  flora,  temperature  when 
sampled,  the  uniformity  of  sampling,  the  moisture  content,  and  the  con- 
dition of  aeration. 

It  was  early  decided  that  probahly  the  chief  rea>son  why  confidence 
is  lacking  in  the  significance  of  plate  counts  is  because  the  organisitis 
have  not  usually  been  given  the  proper  chance  to  develop  into  colonies. 

Table  I  has  been  prepared  to  show  how  differently  organisms  develop 
into  colonies  under  different  periods  of  incubation.  The  technic  followed 
was  that  previously  described,'  and  the  figures  are  based  on  the  average 
of  three  plates  in  each  case. 

^  Noyes.  H.  A.,  and  Voisrt,  Edwin,  in  Proceedinsrs  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 
1916,  pp.  272-301. 

»  Noyes,  H.  A.,  in  Journ.  Amer.  Soc.  of  Agrron..  No.  5,  1916.  pp.  239-249. 

*  Noyes,  H.  A.,  and  Grounds,  G.  L.,  in  Proceedinsrs  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 
1918. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Length  of  Time  to  Incubate  Petri  Plates. 


103 


TABLE  I. 
Cover  Cropped  Soila 
Percent  Counts  at  S,  S,  and  7-Daya  Incubation  are  of  10-Day9  Counts.* 


B  acterial)  DrLunoN 

Cropped  to 

1-40.000 

1-400.000 

3 

5 

7       1  10  Days 

3       1       5 

7 

10  Dayh 

Nothing 

November  14,  1914 

February  6.  1915 

March  2,  1915 

30.1% 

15.5 

56.4 

25.3 

13.4 

84.1 
54.4 
66.2 

s^7' 

93  4 
68.9 
85.2 

100.0% 

100.0 

100.0 

100.0 

100.0 

437^ 
42.9 
12.5 
29.8 

52.2% 

62.6 

88.4 

46.3 

70.2 

••% 
62.6 
86.4 
58.8 
93.0 

100.0% 
100.0 
100  0 

March  27.  1915 

100  0 

April  15,  1915 

100  0 

Average 

27.8 

67.0 

83.9     1     100  0 

32.1 

63.0 

75.2 

100.0 

MiiUt 

November  14,  1914 

February  6,  1915 

March  2,  1915 

33.2 
21.9 
48.6 
32.8 
26.7 

58.4 
84.6 
94.6 
79.2 

82.8 

•• 
100.0 
93.1 
90.6 
92  2 

100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 

•• 
24.1 
33.8 
14.2 

7.4 

55.9 
60.3 
77.5 
54.3 
67.9 

•• 
56.4 
87.5 
80.0 
82.7 

IOC  0 
100.0 
100.0 

March  27,  1915 

100.0 

April  15,  1915 

100  0 

Average 

32.8 

80.0 

94.0 

100.0 

19.9    I    63.2 

76.7 

100.0 

Soy  Beans 

November  14,  1914 

February  6, 1915 

March  2   1915 

18.6 
33.0 
40.4 
30.0 
12.5 

42.9 
65.4 

88.2 
70.9 
85.7 

•• 
80.8 
994 
88.2 
98  2 

100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 

*• 
18.5 
36.5 
22.6 
11.1 

54.8 
54.2 
74.6 
61.3 
75.0 

•• 
66.7 
88.8 
58.1 
91.5 

100.0 
100.0 
100  0 

March  27, 1915 

100.0 

April  15,  1915 

100  0 

Average 

26.9 

70.8 

01  7 

100.0 

22.2     1     64.0 

76.3 

100.0 

Nothing 

November  14,  1914 

February  6, 1915 

March  2. 1915         .... 

20.3 
53.2 
44  1 

36.2 

18  8 

54.5 
97.6 
84.3 
77.3 
73  3 

•• 
100.0 
83.1 
91.4 

78.4 

100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 

•• 
36.3 
14  3 
20.1 
15.8 

60.0 
85.3 
71.4 
50.0 
73.7 

88.2 
81.4 
67.6 
100.0 

100.0 
100.0 
100  0 

March  27,  1915    

100  0 

April  15,  1915 

100  0 

Average |    34  5 

77.4     1     88  2     1     100.0 

21.4     1     68.1 

84.3 

100.0 

Hairy  Vetch 

November  14.  1914 19.6 

February  6,  1915 30.7 

March2.  1915 43.8 

March  27,  1915 28.1 

April  15,  1915 1     15  3 

40.1 
63.8 
8:1.2 
71.4 
84.9 

•• 
84.4 
97.2 
100.0 
94.1 

100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 

•• 
20.3 
20.2 
28.5 
29.5 

42.3 
54.7 
73.7 
69.4 

68.2 

•• 
85.9 
88.5 
89.1 
88.6 

100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
lOO.O 
100.0 

Average 

27.5 

69.7 

93.9 

100.0 

24.6    1     61.7 

88.2 

100.0 

Winter  Rye  (Sown  Early) 

November  14,  1914 

February  6,  1915 

March  2,  1915 

26.5 
46.1 
46.5 
30  3 
24.5 

.55.2 
4S.9 
63.2 
76.4 

84.8 

75.1 
79  4 

100.0 
100  0 

inn  n 

•  • 
16.5 
43  4 
22.4 
10.8 

35.5 
49.5 
84.9 
44.9 
63.8 

•• 
53.6 
84.9 
65.3 
86.8 

100.0 
100.0 
100  0 

March  27,  1915 

86.9     I     100  0 
88.0     1     100.0 

100.0 

April  15,  1915 

100.0 

Average 

34.8 

65.1     1     82.4          100.0 

23.3     1     66.7 

72.7 

100.0 

Nothing 

November  14.  1914 

February  6,  1915 

March  2,  1915 

25.1 

22.9 
61  8 

57.3 
68.3 
83  7 
66  7 
42.3 

•• 
74.7 
101.6 
77  5 
52.7 

100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 

•  • 
38.2 
32.7 
23.7 
13.3 

34.5 
77.9 
69.2 
64.3 
73.3 

•• 
94.1 
90  4 
61.9 
97.7 

100.0 
100.0 
100  0 

March  27.  1915 

April  15.  1915 

23.6 
8.3 

100.0 
100.0 

Average  ... 

28  3 

61.7 

76.6^ 

100.0 

27.0 

63.9 

^86.0 

100.0 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


104        Proceedings  of  India7ia  Academy  of  Science. 

TABLE  I— Continued. 

.   Cover  Cropfbd  Soils 

Percent  CounU  at  5.  5,  and  7-Day  Incubation  are  oftO-Daya  Counts* 


Bacterial  Dilution 

Cropped  to 

1-40,000 

1-400.000 

3       1       5 

7       1  10  Day» 

3       ,       5 

7 

10  Dayc 

Winter  Rye  fSowi.  Late) 

November  14,  1914 

February  6,  1915 

Blarch  2, 1915 

20.9 
26.2 
52.9 
27.6 
14.0 

40.9 
85.0 
85.6 
68.0 
66.2 

♦• 
86.4 
98.9 
82.4 
85.2 

100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 

•• 
20.3 
31.1 
16.6 
20.7 

38.0 
68.5 
70.5 
43.8 
54.8 

•• 
85.2 
83.6 
58.3 
86.6 

100.0 
100  0 
100  0 

March  27. 1915 

100.0 

April  15. 1915 

100  0 

Average 

28.3 

69.1 

88.2 

100.0 

22.2 

55.1 

78.4 

100.0 

Crimton  Clover 

November  14. 1914 

February  6.  1915 

March  2.  1915      

20.5 
36.6 
55.8 
28.1 
10.3 

41.3 
91.2 
86.9 
59.4 
68.4 

99.6 
93.6 
90.6 
85.8 

100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 

26.5 
36.6 
33.3 
10.0 

44.9 
44.9 
80.5 
66.6 
78.0 

•• 
65.3 
85.4 
66.6 
92.0 

100  0 

ino.o 

100  0 

March  27.  1915 

100  0 

April  15,  1915     

100  0 

Average 

'29.9 

69.4 

92.4 

100.0 

26.6 

63.0 

77.3     .     1000 

Nothing 

November  14.  1914 

February  6,  1915 

March  2,  1915 

24.7 

18.6 
50.0 
31.7 
16.0 

47.3 
86.7 
76.5 
62.8 
76.8 

•• 
93.5 
83.0 
95.4 
92.3 

100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 

•• 
9.2 
34.6 
36.9 
17.2 

42.0 
62.9 
^76.9 
44.4 
55.2 

•• 
79.6 
73.5 
66.7 
89.6 

100  0 
lOO.O 
100  0 

March  27,  1915 

100.0 

April  15.  1915 

100  0 

Average 

28.2 

70.0 

91.1 

100.0 

24.5 

56.3 

77.4 

Buckwheat 

November  14,  1914 

February  6.  1915 

March  2,  1915 

12.0 
19.2 
40.5 
26.7 
21.2 

50.0 
94.7 
80.7 
53.5 
77.2 

105.2 
87.1 
77  1 

100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
inn  n 

25.7 
40.5 
20.0 
11.9 

64.5 
65.1 
80.7 
55.0 
866 

•• 
69.7 
91.2 
55.0 
83.3 

1000 
1000 
100  0 

March  27.  1915 

100.0 

April  15,  1915 

84.1     1     100.0 

100.0 

Average. . . . 

23.9 

71.2 

88.4     1     100.0 

24.5 

66.6 

74.8 

1000 

Natural  Growth  of  Weedt 

November  14.  1914 

February  6.  1915 

March  2,  1915 

22.5 
31.2 
55.1 
27.1 
22.5 

53  1 
85.0 
73.7 
71.3 
81.7 

•• 
100.0 
85.8 
88.3 
96.0 

100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 

•• 
31.9 
35.4 
20.5 
17.1 

64.7 
75.0 
70  8 
55.9 
85.3 

•• 

84.7 
72.6 
73  5 
97.6 

100.0 
lOO.O 
lOO.O 

March  27.  1915 

100  0 

April  15.  1915 

100.0 

Averagee 

November  14. 1914 

February  6.  1915 

March  2.  1915 

22.8 
29.6 

48.7 
28.8 
16.9 

49.7 
78.8 
80  8 
66.8 
74.2 

•• 
90.7 
91.7 
86.4 
86.0 

100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 
100.0 

•• 
25.8 
34.9 
22.5 
16.2 

49.1 
63.4 
80.3 
54.7 
69.3 

•• 
74.3 
84.5 
66.5 
90.8 

1000 
100.0 
100.0 

March  27,  1915 

100.0 

Aprill5,  1915 

100.0 

AverageM  of  All 

31.7 

74.0 

92.5 

100.0 

26.2 

70.3 

82.1 

100.0 

**Cottnt8  not  made. 
Temperature  of  Incubation  20"  C 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Length  of  Time  to  Incubate  Petri  Plates. 


105 


The  variations  between  the  per  cent  of  the  colonies  that  developed 
is  from  7.4  to  43.4  per  cent  for  the  three  days'  incubation,  34.5  to  88.4 
per  cent  for  the  five  days'  incubation,  and  from  53.6  to  100.0  per  cent 
for  the  seven  days'  incubation.  The  figures  are  taken  from  the  1-400,000 
bacterial  dilutions,  where  the  number  of  colonies  was  small  enough  to 
allow  for  all  organisms  to  develop  into  colonies.  The  plates  for  the 
1-40,000  bacterial  dilutions  in  many  cases  had  too  many  organisms  for 
satisfactory  counts,  and  this  is  shown  in  the  general  averages  for  this 
dilution  as  compared  to  those  for  the  1-400,000  bacterial  dilution.  The 
cropping  system,  the  aeration  of  the  soil  and  soil  temperature  very 
evidently  influence  the  rate  at  which  the  organisms  of  soil  develop  into 
discernable  colonies  on  petri  plates. 

One  contention  for  the  use  of  the  bacteriologist's  soil  sampler'  was 
that  it  sampled  the  soil  accurately  to  the  depth  desired  and  kept  the 
sample  under  field  conditions  of  aeration  until  analyzed.  Table  II  gives 
data  showing  how  the  methods  of  sampling  can  be  compared  by  the 
relative  distribution  of  the  rapid  and  slow  growing  organisms  present 
in  the  different  samples. 

TABLE  II. 

Percent .?,  6,  and  7-Dav  Counts  of  10-Day  Countt  *•. 
{GraveUy  »oil  sodded  and  containing  about  7%  moisture. ) 


Time  of  Incubation 

3 

5 

7 

10  Days* 

Bacteriolosist's  Soil  Sampler 

15.3% 

20.8% 

53.8% 

100. 0% 

2 

11.8 

394 

49.0 

1000 

3 

11.1 

26.1 

46.3 

1000 

Average 

12.7 

28.8 

49.7 

P.  E.  Brown's  Method 

1 

U.5 

46.0 

72.8 

100.0 

2 

29.2 

43.8 

65.7 

100.0 

3 

,4., 

26.4 

45.0 

100.0 

Average  . 

18.3 

38.4 

61.2 

Slice  Method 

1 

20.5 

48.2 

64.0 

100.0 

2 

4.8 

42.8 

63.2 

100.0 

Average    

12.7 

45.5 

63.6 

Average  of  all        ' 

14.8 

37.7 

57.4 

*Coaiit8  after  10  days  incubation  at  20°C  taken  as  100%  those  at  other  times  are  stated  as  partft  of 
thb.    Bacterial  Dilution  1-400,000. 


••Counts  were  about  3,0  million  per  gram  of  dry  soil. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


106        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

This  test  showed: 

1.  That  the  organisms  present  in  this  packed  sodded  land  were 

principally  slow  growers. 

2.  That  the  uniformity  of  the  development  of  colonies  varied  with 

the  method  by  which  the  samples  were  drawn. 

We  have  found  by  numerous  tests  that  the  number  of  organisms 
found  in  sodded  soil  at  or  below  a  depth  of  four  inches  is  much  less 
than  nearer  the  surface;  and,  further,  it  has  been  observed  that  those 
organisms  occurring  at  the  lower  depths  do  not  usuaUy  multiply  as 
rapidly  on  aerobic  plates  as  those  occurring  nearer  the  surface.  The 
samples  procured  with  the  bacteriologist's  soil  sampler  evidently  had 
near  their  proper  proportions  of  slowly  multiplying  organisms. 

In  testing  out  the  quantities  of  soil  necessary  for  bacteriological 
examinations  some  tests  were  made  with  air-dry  samples  to  show  that 
even  when  samples  were  unified  by  air-drying  a  large  quantity  was 
necessary  for  accurate  results.  Table  III  gives  the  development  of 
colonies  after  different  periods  of  incubation  on  air-dry  soil  sieved  to 
pass  1  millimeter,  while  Table  IV  gives  results  secured  on  the  same 
sample  of  air-dry  soil  when  further  unified  by  using  only  that  portion 
passing  a  sixty-mesh  sieve. 

TABLE  III. 

Percent  6  and  T-Day  Counts  are  of  10-Day  Countt, 
{Air  Dry  Loam  Soil,  tiered  C  pau  1  mm.) 


TiMB  OF  Incubation 

5 

7 

10  Da>-8* 

Sample  No. 

Sise  of  Sample 

50  grams 
50  grams 
50  grams 

72.7% 

79.4 

73.0 

92.1% 

91.2 

88.6 

100.0*^4 
100.0 

100.0 

10  grams 
10  grams 
10  grams 

87.9 
95.4 
58.8 

95.0 
96.8 
85.8 

100  0 

100  0 

100  0 

5  grams 
5  grams 
5  grams 

71.2 
67.8 
75.8 

91.8 
85.2 
97.1 

100  0 

100.0 

100.0 

10        

ill 

86.4 
72.1 
74.9 

95.2 
80.5 
80.3 

100.0 

100.0 

12     

100.0 

13 

0.5  gram 
0.5  gram 
0.5  gram 

64.7 
79.3 
62.5 

85.0 
85.2 
79.4 

100.0 

100.0 

15 

100.0 

Average    , .    .    i . . 

74.8 

88.6 

100.0 

,  I 


*Count8  after  10  daya  incubation  at  20**  C  taken  as  100.0%. 
Other  oounta  states  as  parts  of  these. 
Bacterial  DiluUon  1-400,000. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Length  of  Time  to  Incubate  Petri  Plates. 


107 


TABLE  rV. 

Percent  6  and  7-Daif  Countt  are  of  tO-Day  Counts. 
(Air  Dry  Loom  sieved  to  paaa  90  meak.) 


Time  or  Incubation 

5 

7 

lODays* 

Sample  No. 

Size  of  Sample 

1 

50  grams 
50  grams 
50  grams 

79.9% 
67.0 

89.8 

96.8% 
100.0 
100.0 

100.0% 
100.0 

2              

3 

100.0 

4 

10  grams 
10  grams 
10  grams 

63.7 
72.6 

74.7 

72.1 
91.0 
100.0 

100.0 

5     

100.0 

6 

100.0 

7 

5  grams 
5  grams 
5  grams 

85.2 
90.8 
63.4 

93.2 
95.7 
73.2 

100.0 

8     

100.0 

9 

100.0 

13                

1.0  gram 
1.0  gram 
1.0  gram 

93.7 
63.6 
62.8 

100.0 
75.3 

85.8 

100  0 

14 

100.0 

15 

100.0 

16 

0.5  gram 
0.5  gram 
0.5  gram 

64.3 
66.5 
74.9 

73.7 
100.0 
77.5 

100.0 

17 

100.0 

18            

100.0 

Average 

74.2 

88.9 

100.0 

*Coant8  after  10  days  incubation  at  20*C  taken  as  100%. 
Other  counts  stated  as  parts  of  these  Bacterial  dilution  1-400,000. 

The  results  g^iven  in  the  previous  tables  show: 

1.  That  the  greater  proportion  of  the  organisms  present  in  this 

air-dry  soil  develop  into  colonies  after  five  days'  incubation. 

2.  The  larger  the  aliquot  of  soil  used  the  more  uniformity  be- 

tween the  development  of  colonies  on  the  plates. 

3.  In  five  cases  out  of  the  fifteen  all  the  colonies  were  counted 

after  seven  days'  incubation  when  the  soil  was  sieved  to  pass 
a  sixty-mesh  sieve. 

It  has  been  observed,  in  soil  bacteriology  investigations  in  an  apple 
orchard  where  different  systems  of  soil  management  are  practiced,  that 
the  organisms  multiply  into  colonies  at  different  rates,  dependent  on  the 
system  of  management  practiced.  The  results  of  this  work  are  given 
in  Table  V. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


108        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

TABLE  V. 

Average  Percent  6  and  7-Day  Counts  are  of  lO-Day  Counta, 
{Silt  Loam  Subjected  to  Different  Syetema  of  Soil  Management.) 


Time  or  Incubation 

5 

7 

10  Day?* 

I 

41. »% 

100.0% 

100.0=7 

Clean  Cultivation 

2 

27.2 

97.3 

100.0 

3 

23.5 

100.0 

100.0 

1 

42.3 

82.3 

lOO.O 

Sod 

2 

41.5 

78.8 

1000 

3 

33.3 

79.0 

lOO  0 

1 

65.1 

85.3 

100.0 

Straw  Mulch 

2 

55.2 

87.4 

100.0 

3 

65.2 

81.7 

100. 0 

1 

67.3 

88.2 

100.0 

Light  Grai»  Mulch 

2 

58.3 

96.9 

lOO.O 

3 

37.0 

82.2 

lOO.O 

Average  All    

46.5 

88.3 

lOO.O 

A  verase  Clean  Cultivation 

30.9 

99.1 

lOOO 

39.0 

80.0 

lOO.O 

Averase  Straw  Mulch 

61.8 

84.8 

lOOO 

Averaire  Liitht  Qraas  Mulch 

54.2 

89.1 

lOO.O 

Table  V  shows: 

1.  The  rate  of  development  of  colonies  varies  with  the  system  of 

soil  management. 

2.  Those  conditions  which  unify  differences  in  soil  aeration  are 

present  where  the  rates  of  development  of  colonies  check 
closest. 

3.  Short  periods  of  incubation  would  not  show  the  relative  num- 

bers of  bacteria  actually  present  in  the  soils. 

Many  sets  of  plates  have  been  counted  after  twelve  and  fifteen  days' 
incubation,  but  very  rarely  have  counts  increased  at  all  after  ten  days' 
incubation.  With  suitable  media  the  counts  obtained  after  seven  days' 
incubation  have  unifojrmly  shown  the  comparisons  between  samples,  and 
this  does  not  mean  that  the  increases  from  seven  to  ten  days  are  numer- 
ically or  proportionately  the  same. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Length  of  Time  to  Incubate  Petri  Plates.  109 

Summary. 

Counts  made  after  ten  days'  incubation  at  20**  C.  of  petri  plates, 
made  from  bacterial  dilutions  of  soil,  give  reliable  results  as  to  the 
bacterial  content  of  the  soil,  providing  the  number  of  colonies  present 
per  plate  is  small  enough  for  all  organisms  to  develop  into  colonies. 

The  rapidity  with  which  bacteria  develop  into  colonies  has  been 
shown  to  vary  with  the  soil,  and  to  be  influenced  by  soil  temperature, 
moisture  and  aeration. 

Much  of  the  lack  of  confidence  in  results  obtained  by  the  plate  method 
is  due  to  having  too  many  colonies  present  per  plate*  and  not  allowing 
sufficient  time  of  incubation  of  the  petri  plates. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


110        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 
Bacteria  in  Frozen  Soil. 


H.  A.  NOYES,  Purdue  University. 


Two  soil  bacteriologists  have  published  data  as  showing  that  the 
number  of  bacteria  in  soil  increases  when  the  soil  is  frozen.  These 
reported  increases  in  numbers  are  so  contradictory  to  general  belief  con- 
cerning bacterial  activities  at  low  (about  freezing)  temperatures  that 
not  only  the  experimental  data  but  abstracts  of  the  technic  followed  are 
given  below. 

Figure  1  gives  the  data  presented  in  Cornell  University  Agricultural 
Experiment  Station  Bulletin  No.  338.  The  following  is  an  abstract  of 
the  technic  followed: 

"Samples  of  soil  were  usually  taken  with  an  auger  or  by  the  com- 
bined use  of  an  auger  and  pick  when  the  ground  was  frozen.  During 
the  winter  of  1909-1910  a  pick  alone  was  used.  When  an  auger  was 
employed  the  proceeds  from  two  or  three  borings  were  combined,  except 
in  winter,  when  only  one  hole  was  made;  but  when  the  pick  alone  was 
used  it  was  impossible  to  take  any  such  pains  in  order  to  obtain  a  rep- 
resentative sample.  *  *  *  The  depth  of  sampling  was  six  to  eight 
inches,  although  in  winter  1909-1910  it  varied  more  than  during  the 
remainder  of  the  period.  *  *  *  The  soil  was  carefully  mixed,  in 
summer  by  sieving  through  a  sieve  as  fine  as  the  moisture  content  would 
allow,  in  winter  by  stirring  after  thawing.  Of  this  soil  0.5  gram  was 
added  to  sufficient  sterile  water  to  make  a  volume  of  100  cc.  *  *  * 
The  samples  taken  from  any  one  of  these  four  spots  must  have  all  been 
from  within  a  circle  of  six-inch  radius.  The  media  used  varied;  the 
one  most  extensively  used  was  soil  extract  gelatin  containing  0.1  per  cent 
dextrose.  Plates  were  incubated  seven  days  at  19**  to  20*  C.  for  gelatin 
and  usually  two  weeks  for  agar." 

The  following  statement  is  taken  from  the  author's  summary  of  the 
work*:  "Quantitative  determinations  *  *  *  have  shown  *  *  * 
an  increase  in  numbers  of  bacteria  in  frozen  soil." 

FifiTure  2  gives  the  data  presented  in  Research  Bulletin  No.  4  of  the 
Iowa  Experiment  Station.  The  following  is  an  abstract  of  the  technic 
followed : 

"The  samples  were  drawn  from  the  plot  already  described  within 
an  area  of  about  five  feet  square.     *     *     *     They  were  taken  to  a 

»Conn.  H.  J.,  in  Centrab't  fur  Bakt  II  Abteil.  28    (1910),  p.  422. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Bacteria  in  Frozen  Soil  111 

depth  of  20  cm.  by  means  of  a  2.5-inch  auger,  except  during  the  time 
that  the  soil  was  frozen,  when  it  became  necessary  to  substitute  a  mat- 
tock or  grub  hoe  for  the  auger.  The  samples  were  collected  on  a  sterile 
mixing  cloth  and  then  placed  in  sterile  glass  jars  and  taken  to  the 
laboratory  and  innoculations  performed  as  quickly  as  possible.  *  *  * 
In  this  work  it  was  deemed  inadvisable  to  permit  such  a  multiplication 
of  organisms  to  occur  in  the  sample  as  would  undoubtedly  take  place  if 
they  were  allowed  to  stand  long  enough  to  thaw  out  completely.  Con- 
sequently the  frozen  samples  employed  here  were  thoroughly  commin- 
uted by  means  of  a  sterile  spatula,  carefully  mixed,  and  then  subsam- 
pled  for  innoculations.  The  maximum  time  required  to  prepare  the 
sample  in  this  way  was  ten  minutes.  *  *  *  loo  gram  quantities  of 
the  soil  prepared  *  *  *  were  shaken  for  five  minutes  with  200  cc. 
portions  of  sterile  distilled  water.  Lipman  and  Brown  'synthetic  agar' 
was  used  and  counts  made  after  three  days'  incubation  at  22''  C.  Re- 
sults are  averages  of  two  dilutions  which  agreed  closely  in  every  case." 
The  author  sununarizes  the  results  given  in  Figure  2  as  follows: 

1.  "By  means  of  the  'modified  synthetic'  agar  plate  method,  bacteria 
are  shown  to  be  present  in  large  numbers  in  a  typical  Wisconsin  drift 
soil  when  it  is  completely  frozen  and  the  temperature  is  below  zero 
degrees  Centigrade;  furthermore,  increases  and  decreases  in  numbers 
of  organisms  occur  during  this  period  and  larger  numbers  are  found 
after  the  soil  has  been  frozen  for  a  considerable  period  than  before  it 
begins  to  freeze." 

2.  "During  the  fall  season,  the  number  of  bacteria  present  in  the 
soil  diminishes  gradually  with  the  lowering  of  the  temperature." 

The  methods  of  sampling  and  the  technic  employed  in  getting  the 
results  rejwrted  in  the  above  mentioned  publications  were  so  different 
from  those  adopted  in  this  laboratory,  after  much  testing,  that  the 
results  of  data  on  bacterial  counts  obtained  on  different  dates  from 
samples  of  a  silt  loam  variously  cover  cropped  are  given  in  Fig^ure  3. 
The  technic  of  sampling,  diluting  and  plating  is  that  previously  de- 
scribed.' 

It  is  to  be  noted  that  the  numbers  of  bacteria  found  in  the  soil  when 
the  temperature  was  32**  or  lower  were  greater  than  those  found  at 
other  times  during  the  winter.  The  soil  thermometers  were  at  a  depth 
of  nine  inches  and  the  samples  were  drawn  to  this  depth.  It  had  been 
found  impracticable  to  take  samples  when  the  ground  was  solidly  frozen, 
and  samples  were  taken  (on  the  dates)  starred  just  as  the  soil  had 
thawed  enough  so  that  the  samplers*  could  be  used.     The  question  thus 

*  Noyes,  H.  A.,  Voigrt,  Edwin,  in  Proceedingrs  Indiana  Academy  of  Science.  1916. 
pp.  272-301. 

*  Noyes,  H.  A.,  in  Joum.  Amer.  Soc.  Agron.  Vol.  7.  No.  6   (1916). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


112        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


IS..     , 


'I  - 


Ul 


i  // 


•^ 


I 


;? 


i{;:H|ji;iK!t^!^i;!tfW» 


«i  -  ■  '"f ^■ 

■    1    t 


'1 


4     ^       ^-       :!l---:-i----i^.-:-^-.-.H^--il.^ 


!      / 

;... 


__i 


7' 


1"     J 


I     I 


;t 


-'xr 


-V 


-J-^. 


;      1 

N-!:- 

i 

J. 

\            ■ 

! 

^i.^tML.     .. 


/^  '  *^  r 


-^  .^^>^.-^j^*- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Bacteria  in  Frozen  Soil. 


113 


gIffITd"i^Js;::ih-Hi:rd:^tl[r=^Hi=t:=ir^IT^■!■;:r^-^r 


n^m 


ifflllMiilvL  ft.i.l_ 


*4  ^  " 

^         ^         J^ 


......,|. 


5        US' 
*^       l*.      ^ 
J^         ft         *..      J: 


4<  .■: 


- 

3 

■: 

j[^[ 

•  1-17   *?*TT   AL 


jniliiini;^ii:iii;M;[i:;;ti[i;IJ?r4JiHliJJi^^^^^ 


8—16568 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


114        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 

naturally  arose  as  to  whether  the  counts  obtained  in  this  and  the  pre- 
vious work  were  not  due  to  increased  bacterial  activities  as  the  ground 
thawed. 

To  give  more  definite  information,  special  experiments  have  been 
carried  out.  A  special  bacteriologist's  soil  sampler'  reinforced  with  steel 
was  secured  and  driven  down  into  solidly  frozen  soil.  The  sampler  con- 
taining the  frozen  soil  was  brought  into  the  warm  laboratory  and  in  a 
half  hour  it  was  possible  to  push  the  core  of  frozen  soil  out  of  the 
sampler.  This  core  was  placed  on  a  laboratory  table.  A  wire  was 
pushed  into  the  core  from  time  to  time  and  it  was  found  that  thawing 
took  place  very  slowly.  It  was  forty-six  hours  from  the  time  that  the 
sample  was  laid  out  on  the  table  before  it  had  thawed  enough  for  the 
wire  to  be  thrust  through  it. 

To  see  if  the  bacterial  numbers  in  soil  were  not  increased  on  the 
thawing  out  of  the  soil  due  to  different  layers  of  the  soil  being  brought 
successively  under  more  favorable  conditions  for  bacterial  development, 
the  following  test  was  made: 

A  sample  of  frozen  loam  soil  was  obtained,  brought  to  the  laboratory, 
pushed  out  of  the  sampler,  then  taken  to  a  room  having  a  temperature 
below  0°  C,  where  it  was  halved  lengthwise  by  chopping  with  an  axe. 
One-half  was  chopped  and  mixed  and  fifty  grams  weighed  out  and 
analyzed  immediately  for  its  bacterial  content.  The  other  half  was 
brought  to  the  laboratory  and  allowed  to  stand  twenty-four  hours.  It 
thawed  out  in  this  time.  The  sample  was  mixed  and  its  bacterial  con- 
tent determined.  The  results  of  this  test  were  that  the  sample  allowed 
to  thaw  out  before  it  was  analyzed,  gave  over  three  times  the  bacterial 
count  that  the  one  analyzed  immediately  did. 

The  following  experiment  is  the  latest  one  we  have  conducted  on 
this  subject,  and  it  is  left  to  the  reader  to  judge  from  this  in  connection 
with  the  other  work  reported  as  to  whether  bacteria  multiply  in  frozen 
soil.  About  twenty  kilos  of  soil  (silt  loam)  were  procured  by  taking 
soil  from  between  the  depths  of  four  and  seven  inches  of  a  plot  where 
millet  had  been  plowed  under  each  of  the  two  preceding  springs.  This 
soil  was  mixed  and  sieved  through  a  screen  having  eight  meshes  to  the 
inch.  The  portion  passing  the  screen  was  mixed  thoroughly  and  then 
quartered.  One  quarter  (about  five  kilos)  was  brought  to  the  labora- 
tory. Sterile  12-ounce  bottles  plugged  with  cotton  had  been  previously 
prepared  and  150  grams  of  the  mixed  and  prepared  sample  were  weighed 
out  into  each  of  twenty-six  bottles.  The  soil  in  the  bottles  was  then 
compacted  by  dropping  them  on  the  bench  thirty  times.  The  bottles 
were  then  divided  into  three  groups  and  these  groups  were  incubated  in 
the  following  places: 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Bacteria  in  Frozen  Soil. 


115 


A..A .  i ..  1 3  i__ 


5 


£. 


.  ij7  **iiU, 


.4:.:i 


■  J'n.li!^ 


itfUMG      F>* 


■ii 

■■1-::: 

■iilii 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


116        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

A.  An  ice  box,  temperature  around  45**  F. 

B.  In  a  cold  storag^e  room  in  a  creamery,  temperature  36**  F.  to 

42**  F. 

C.  Cold  room  in  creamery,  temperature  between  27*  F.  and  30"  F. 

The  counts  obtained  from  these  tests  are  given  in  Table  I. 

TABLE  I. 
Ckanget  in  BadtrM  Content  of  Soil  Stored  in  Different  Refrigerating  Room%. 


Lengths  of  Time  of  TncubBtion 

Temp.  45*  F 

Temp.  39'  F 

Temp.  29-  F 

Odaya 

12. 4* 

12.4 

12.4 

21 

11.7 

9.5 

5.5 

78 

0.7 

4.8 

4.5 

*Figures  are  millions  per  cram  of  soil  as  used. 

Summary. 

It  is  known  to  be  difficult  to  get  accurate  figures  of  the  numbers  of 
bacteria  present  in  frozen  soil.  It  is  not  known  that  the  layer  of  soil 
just  below  the  constantly  increasing  layer  of  frozen  soil  is  not  very 
favorable  for  the  multiplication  of  certain  classes  of  bacteria. 

The  data  reported  in  this  paper,  obtained  in  this  laboratory  and  from 
the  work  of  others  does  not  prove  that  the  number  of  bacteria  present 
in  soil  is  increased  when  the  soil  is  frozen. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Some  Abnormalities  in  Plant  Structure. 


M.  S.  Markle,  Earlham  College. 


In  looking  over  large  numbers  of  microscopic  slides  made  during  the 
past  few  years,  I  have  noted  many  instances  of  abnormalities  in  struc- 
ture, some  of  which  have  not  been  reported,  to  my  knowledge.  Assuming 
that  some  of  them  may  be  of  interest  to  members  of  the  Academy,  I 
submit  drawings  of  a  number  of  them. 

In  cutting  some  fern  prothallia  of  an  undetermined  species  collected 
in  the  Washington  Park  greenhouse  at  Chicago,  I  noticed  large  numbers 
of  imbedded  archegonia  and  a  few  instances  of  deeply  imbedded  anther- 
idia.  As  will  be  seen  from  the  drawings,  these  structures  occurred 
several  cells  below  the  surface  of  the  prothallium.  An  imbedded  arche- 
gonium  was  generally  associated  with  an  ordinary  one,  though  not 
always.  The  imbedded  archegonium  begins  as  a  single  cell,  distinguish- 
able by  its  larger  nucleus  and  denser  cytoplasm.  The  axial  row  develops 
like  that  of  an  archegonium  of  the  usual  type,  except  that  there  are 
usually  two  neck  canal  cells,  if  such  they  can  be  called  here,  instead  of 
the  usual  single  binucleate  one.  This  is  perhaps  due  to  the  differences 
in  the  pressure  of  the  surrounding  cells.  A  variation  in  the  imbedded 
archegonia  was  found  in  one  instance,  in  which  there  were  two  arche- 
gonia, with  the  position  of  the  cells  in  the  axial  rows  reversed,  as  shown 
in  the  figure. 

Stages  in  the  development  of  the  imbedded  antheridia  were  not 
found. 

In  sectioning  some  ovaries  of  Lilium  of  unknown  origin,  I  found 
several  sacs  in  which  the  four  free  nuclei  following  the  second  mitosis 
all  gathered  at  one  end  of  the  sac,  instead  of  two  at  each  end,  as  usual. 
One  instance  of  a  mature  embryo-sac  that  had  evidently  resulted  from 
the  further  development  of  such  a  condition  as  that  mentioned  above 
showed  six  nuclei  at  one  end  of  the  sac  completely  surrounded  by  walls, 
while  two  nuclei  remained  free. 

The  "three-story"  reproductive  branch  of  Vaucheria  shown  in  the 
figure  was  found  in  some  material  which  was  collected  near  Baton  Rouge, 
Ala.  The  other,  in  which  a  secondary  sexual  branch  was  formed  in  the 
place  of  an  oogonium,  was  collected  near  Earlham  College,  Richmond, 
Indiana. 

The  megaspore  tetrad  of  Selaginella  shown  in  the  figure  shows  the 
outer  wall  of  the  spore  continuous  around  the  group  of  spores  instead 
of  surrounding  the  individual  spores. 


(117) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


118        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


Fi«  1 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Some  Abnormalities  in  Plant  Structure. 


119 


Fig.  2. 


O 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


120        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


Fig.  3. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Some  Abnormalities  in  Plant  Structure. 


121 


F  g.  4. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


122        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


Fi«.5. 


Fif.  6. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Some  Abnormalities  in  Plant  Structure.  123 


< 


Fig  7. 


FiA.8. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


124        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


Fig.  9. 

Explanation  of  Figures. 

Fig.  1.    Initial  6f  imbedded  archegonium. 

Fig.  2.    Completely  formed  imbedded  archegonium. 

Fig.  3.    Two  imbedded  archegonia  with  axial  rows  reversed. 

Fig.  4.    Imbedded  antheridium. 

Figs.  5  and  6.    Abnormal  embryo*sacs  of  Lilium. 

Figs.  7  and  8.    Abnormal  sexual  branches  of  Vaucheria  geminata. 

Fig.  9.    Abnormal  megaspore  tetrad  of  Selaginella. 


*  i 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Plants  of  Boone  County,  Kentucky. 


James  Carlton  Nelson,  Salem,  Ore. 


The  following  is  a  list  of  plants  collected  in  that  part  of  Boone 
County,  Kentucky  lying  along  the  Ohio  River  opposite  the  Indiana 
counties  of  Ohio  and  Switzerland,  extending  along  the  river  from  the 
town  of  Grant  to  the  mouth  of  Gunpowder  Creek — some  ten  miles — and 
back  from  the  river  an  average  distance  of  seven  miles.  The  region 
belongs  geologically  to  the  "Cincinnati  Uplift,"  and  is  very  hilly,  except 
in  the  wide  East  Bend  river-bottom.  There  is  no  exposed  rock,  such  as 
forms  the  picturesque  limestone  cliffs  farther  down  the  Ohio,  except  a 
soft  blue  shale  in  deep  stream-channels,  and  some  large  masses  of  con- 
glomerate marking  the  terminal  moraine  of  the  Ice  Age,  which  extends 
inland  from  the  Ohio  at  "Split  Rock,"  opposite  the  mouth  of  Laughery 
Creek,  to  a  point  about  three  miles  west  of  the  town  of  Union.  The 
flora  of  this  morainic  district  presents  a  marked  contrast  to  that  of  the 
rest  of  the  county.  The  region  was  originally  covered  with  a  dense 
forest  of  deciduous  trees,  which  have  been  largely  cleared  away,  leaving 
a  very  rich  soil,  which  is  rapidly  washed  away  on  the  steep  slopes,  so 
that  the  prevailing  soil  is  a  tough  yellow  clay  mixed  with  fragments  of 
extremely  hard  blue  fossiliferous  limestone.  The  chief  crop  is  tobacco, 
which  has  rapidly  exhausted  the  soil  and  rendered  it  in  many  places 
sterile  and  unproductive.  These  collections  were  made  during  the  years 
1881-1893.  I  had  no  assistance  in  the  work  except  such  as  was  afforded 
by  Gray's  Manual,  and  the  determinations  represent  in  nearly  every  case 
simply  my  own  unsupported  opinion.  The  nomenclature  is  that  of  Gray's 
Manual,  Seventh  Edition.  In  making  the  determinations  I  usei  the 
Fifth  and  later  the  Sixth  Edition  of  this  Manual.  I  am  indebted  to 
Mr.  Chas.  C.  Deam  of  Bluffton,  Indiana,  for  his  kindness  in  looking  over 
the  entire  list  and  offering  suggestions  based  on  his  own  wide  knowledge 
of  the  plants  of  Indiana.  These  suggestions  I  have  in  every  case  incor- 
porated in  the  list.  The  region  lies  well  within  the  limits  of  Gray's 
Manual,  and  there  was  little  intrusion  of  extra-limital  species.  The 
Northern  collector  will  note,  however,  the  predominance  of  Southern 
types.  Noteworthy  is  the  total  absence  of  Ericaceae  proper  and  Orchid- 
acese,  and  the  scanty  representation  of  Umbelliferae.  No  attempt  was 
made  to  determine  ferns,  grasses  and  sedges. 


(125) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


126        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

POLYPODIACEAE: 

Adiantutn  pedatum  L.     In  rich  woods,  common. 

(Two  or  three  other  members  of  this  family  occur,  but  I  was 
unable  to  determine  them.) 

Ophioglossaceae  : 

Botrychium  virginianum  (L.)   Sw.     Occasional  in  woods. 

Equisbtaceae: 

Equisetum  arvense  L.     Abundant  in  low  ground. 
Equisetum  hyerruUe  L.,  var.  robttstum  (A.  Br.)   A.  A.  Eaton.    Low 
ground,  not  common. 

PiNACEAE: 

Junipems  virginiana  L.    Occasional  on  open  hillsides. 
Typhaceae: 

Typha  latifolia  L.    Not  common,  owing  to  absence  of  any  large  area 
of  marshy  ground  in  the  district. 
Alismaceae: 

Sagittaria  latifolia  Willd.     Moist  river-shores,  infrequent. 
Gramineae: 

No  attempt  was  made  to  determine  these.  The  only  species 
that  I  can  positively  affirm  as  growing  in  the  district  were: 

Andropogon  virginiciis  L.     Common  in  sterile  soil. 

Panicum  capillare  L.     Abundant  in  cultivated  fields. 

Echinochloa   Crus-galli    (L.)    Beauv.      Common   in    barn-yards  and 
waste  places. 

Digitaria  sanguinalis  (L.)   Scop.     Common  in  door-yards. 

Setaria  viridis  (L.)   Beauv.     Abundant  in  fields. 

Phleum  pratense  L.     A  common  escape. 

AgroHtis  alba  L.     Not  cultivated,  but  common. 

Eleusine  indica  Gaertn.     Common  in  door-yards. 

Eragrostis  hypnoides  (Lam.)   BSP.     Abundant  on  river-shores. 

Dae ty lis  glomerata  L.     An  occasional  escape. 

Poa  pratensis  L.     Common  in  cultivation,  and  freely  escaping. 

Elymus  virginictcs  L.     Dry,  open  ground,  common. 

Hyatrix  patula  Moench.     Common  in  woods. 
Cyperaceae: 

Here  again  nothing  was  done.  The  genera  Eleocha/ris,  Cyp- 
eruSf  Scirpus  and  Carex  were  all  represented,  but  not  fully,  owing 
to  the  infrequency  of  marsh-land.  The  most  characteristic  Carex 
was  a  form  with  broad  evergreen  leaves,  growing  in  woods.  It 
evidently  belonged  to  the  section  Careyanae^  and  I  suspect  was 
C.  platyphyila  Carey. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Plants  of  Boone  County,  Kentucky.  127 

Araceae: 

Arisaema  triphyllum  (L.)   Schott.  Common  in  woods. 

Arisaema  Dracontium  (L.)  Schott.  With  the  last,  but  less  common. 

Ac(yni8  Calamus  L.     An  occasional  escape  in  dry  ground. 

COMMELINACEAE: 

Tradescantia  virginica  L.     Common  in  meadows. 

Juncaceae: 

Juncus  bufonius  L.     Common  along  streams. 
Juncus  tenuis  Willd.     Abundant  in  dry  soil. 
Juncus  effujius  L.     Less  common  than  the  other  two. 
Luzula  campestris  L.  var.  multiflora  (Ehrh.)   Celak.     Occasional  in 
woods. 

Liliaceae: 

Uvularia  grandiflara  Sm.     Rich  woods,  not  infrequent. 

Allium  canadense  L.     Occasional  in  dry,  stony  ground. 

HemerocaJlis  fulva  L.     A  common  escape. 

Lilium  canudense  L.    Very  rare. 

Erythronium  americanum  Ker.     Rich  woods,  not  common. 

Erythronium  alhidum  Nutt.     With  the  last,  but  much  more  common. 

Rarely  flowers. 
Camxissia  esculenta  (Ker)   Robinson.     Not  common. 
Omithogalum  umbellatum  L.     An  occasional  escape. 
Asparagus  officinalis  L.     Escaped  to  roadsides  and  meadows. 
Smila^na  racemosa   (L.)   Desf.     Common  in  woods. 
Polygoruitum  biflorum  (Walt.)   Ell.     Common  in  woods. 
Polygonatum  commutatum  (R.  &  S.)  Dietr.     Common  in  woods  and 

grass-land. 
Trillium  sessile  L.     Very  common  in  rich  woods. 
Trillium  erectum  L.     With  the  last,  but  less  common. 
Smilax  herbacea  L.     Occasional  in  woods. 
Smilax  rotundifolia  L.     Common  in  thickets. 
Smilax  glauca  Walt.     In  thickets,  scarce. 
Smilax  hispida  Muhl.     Rich  woods,  rare. 

Dioscoreaceae  : 

Dioscorea  villosa  L.     Common  in  thickets. 

Iridaceae: 

Sisyrinchium  angtustifolium  Mill.     Common  in  meadows. 

Salicaceae: 

Salix  nigra  Marsh.     Abundant  on  river-shores. 

SaXix  alba  L.  var.  vitellina  (L.)   Koch.     A  frequent  escape. 

Salix  longifolia  Muhl.     Along  streams,  rather  rare. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


128        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

ScUix  discolor  Muhl.     River-banks,  common. 

Salix  purpurea  L.    An  occasional  escape  along  the  river,  where  it  is 

cultivated  for  basket-work,  etc. 
Popuhis  grandidentata  Michx.     Occasional  along  streams. 
Populus  deltoides  Marsh.     Abundant  along  the  river. 
Juglandacbae: 

Juglans  cinerea  L.     Rich  woods,  less  common  than  the  next. 

Juglans  nigra  L.    Very  common  throughout. 

Ca/rya  alba  (L.)   K.  Koch.     Rich  hillsides,  common. 

Gary  a  ovata  (Mill.)  K.  Koch.     With  the  last,  but  less  common. 

Gary  a  glabra  (Mill.)  Spach.    Open  woods. 

Gary  a  cordiformis  (Wang.)   K.  Koch.     Low  woods. 

Betulaceae: 

Ostrya  virginiana  (Mill.)   K.  Koch.     In  woods,  not  infrequent. 

Garpiniis  caroliniana  Walt.     Common  in  rich  woods. 

Alnus  rugosa   (Du  Roi)    Spreng.     A  single  specimen  on  the  river- 
shore. 
Fagaceae: 

Fagus  grandi folia  Ehrh.    Very  common  in  rich  woods. 

Quercus  alba  L.    The  commonest  species  and  our  largest  tree.    Some 
specimens  reached  a  diameter  of  eight  feet. 

Quercus  niacrocarj)a  Michx.     In  rocky  woods. 

Quercus  Muhlenbergii  Engelm.     With  the  last. 

Quercus  rubra  L.    Common  on  dry  hillsides. 

Quercus  paXustris  Moench.     Low  ground,  not  common. 

Quercus  velutina  Lam.     Rich  soil,  not  common. 

Quercus  imbrica/ria  Michx.     At  a  few  stations  in  the  interior. 
Urticaceae: 

Ulmus  fulva  Michx.    Rich  woods,  less  common  than  the  next. 

Ulmus  americana  L.     Very  common. 

Geltis  occidentalis  L.     Woods,  especially  along  the  river,  common. 

Gannabis  sativa  L.     Occasional  in  waste  places.     Not  cultivated. 

Humulus  Lupulus  L.    An  occasional  escape. 

Morus  rubra  L.     Rich  woods,  common. 

Urtica  gra^cilis  Ait.    Common  in  fence-rows,  etc. 

Laportea  canadensis   (L.)   Gaud.     Rich  woods,  common. 

Pilea  pumila  (L.)  Gray.     Rich  woods,  common. 

Boehmeria  cylindrica  (L.)   Sw.     Low  ground  along  streams. 

Parietaria  pennsylvanica  Muhl.     Shaded  banks,  common. 
Loranthaceae: 

Phoradendron  flavescens  (Pursh)   Nutt.     Common,  especially  on  Ul- 
mus and  Gleditsia, 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Plants  of  Boone  County,  Kentucky.  129 

Aristolochiaceae  : 

Asarum  canadense  L.     Common  in  rich  woods. 
Aristolochia  Serpentaria  L.     In  wooded  districts,  rare. 

Polygon  ACEAE; 

Rumex  Britannica  L.     In  wet  places,  rather  scarce. 

(This  probably  should  be  R,  cUtissimus  Wood.  Mr.  Deam  tells 
me  that  Britannica  occurs  in  Ind.  only  in  the  northern  counties, 
while  altissimus  is  common  along  the  Ohio  R.) 

Rumex  crispus  L.     Abundant  in  fields  and  meadows. 

Rumex  obtusifolius  L.     Very  common  about  dwellings. 

Rumex  Acetosella  L.     Common  in  poor  soil. 

Polygonum  aviculare  L.     Abundant  in  door-yards,  etc. 

Polygonum  erectum  L.     With  the  last. 

Polygonum  amphibium  L.     Occasional  in  wet  places. 

(This  species  has  been  found  in  Ind.  by  Mr.  Deam  but  twice, 
while  P.  Muhlenbergii  (Meisn.)  Wats.,  which  in  Gray's  5th  Ed. 
was  not  separated  from  amphibium,  is  abundant  in  the  counties 
along  the  Ohio,  so  my  report  is  doubtless  an  error,  and  should  be 
changed  to  Muhlenbergii,) 

Polygonum  Hydropiper  L.     Wet  ground,  common. 

Polygonum  acre  HBK.    Abundant  in  waste  places. 

Polygonum,  orientale  L.     An  occasional  escape  about  dwellingfs. 

Polygonum  xnrginianum  L.     Rich  thickets,  common. 

Polygonum  sagittatum  L.    Occasional  in  low  ground. 

Polygonum  Convolvulus  L.    Very  common  in  cultivated  fields. 

Polygonum  scandens  L.     Common  in  thickets. 

CHENOPODI  ACEAE : 

Chenopodium  ambrosioides  L.    Common  on  river-shores  and  in  waste 
places. 

Chenopodium  Botrys  L.     Sandy  soil  near  the  river,  never  inland. 

Chenopodium  hybridum  L.     Infrequent  in  waste  places. 

Chenopodium  album  L.    Abundant  about  dwellings  and  in  fields. 
Amaranthaceae  : 

Amjaranthus  retroflexvji  L.     Very  common  in  cultivated  ground. 

Amaranthu^  hybridum  L.     With  the  last,  but  less  common. 

Amaranthu^  paniculatus  L.     Occasional  near  dwellings. 

Amaranthus  spinoau^  L.    Waste  ground  near  the  river,  infrequent. 

Acnida  tuberculata  Moq.     River-shores,  common. 

Acnida  tuberculata  Moq.  var.  subnuda  Wats.     With  the  last. 

Acnida  tuberculata  Moq.  var.  pi^ostrata   (Uline  &  Bray)    Robinson. 
With  the  last. 
Phytolaccaceae : 

Phytolacca  decandra  L.     Rich  soil  in  low  grounds,  common. 

9—16568 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


130        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 

ILLECEBRACEAE : 

Anychia  polygonoides  Raf.     Open  places,  rather  scarce. 
Anychia  canadensis  (L.)  BSP.    Dry  woods,  common. 

AlZOACEAE: 

Mollugo  vertidllata  L.     Sandy  river-shores  and  tobacco-fields,  com- 
mon. 
Caryophyllaceae  : 

Stellaria  pubera  Michx.     Rocky  woods,  common. 

Stellaria  media  (L.)  Cyrill.    Abundant  about  dwellings. 

Cerastium  vulgatum  L.    Conmion  in  fields  and  meadows. 

Agrostemma  Githago  L.    Common  in  grain-fields. 

Silene  antirrhina  L.    Occasional  in  cultivated  ground. 

Silene  virginica  L.    Open  woods,  rather  rare. 

Silene  stellata  (L.)   Ait.  f.     Shaded  banks,  not  infrequent. 

Saponaria  officinalis  L.     An  occasional  escape. 
PORTULACACEAE: 

Claytonia  virginica  L.    Common  in  woods. 

Cla/ytonia  caroliniana  Michx.    With  the  last,  but  much  less  common. 

Portulaca  oleracea  L.     Abundant  in  cultivated  and  waste  ground. 
Ranunculaceae  : 

Ranunculus  sceleratus  L.    Wet  places,  scarce. 

Ranunculus  abortivus  L.     Shady  places,  very  common. 

Ranunculus  recurvatus  Poir.    In  woods,  common. 

Ranunculus  septentrionalis  Poir.    Moist  ground,  common. 

Thalictrum  dioicum  L.     Rocky  woods,  common. 

Thalictrum  polygamum  Muhl.     River-banks  in  rich  soil. 

Anemonella   thalictroides    (L.)    Spach.     In   woods   in   early   spring, 
common. 

Hepatica  a^itiloba  DC.     Only  on  moraines,  where  it  is  common. 

Anemone  virginiana  L.     In  meadows  and  fence-rows. 

Anemone  canadensis  L.     Low  ground,  especially  in  river-bottoms. 

Clematis  virginiana  L.     River-banks,  not  infrequent. 

Isopyrum  bitematum  (Raf.)  T.  &  G.    Common  in  thickets. 

Aquilegia  canadensis  L.     Rocky  woods,  infrequent. 

Delphinium  tricome  Michx.     Meadows  and  thickets,  common. 

Cimicifuga  racemosa  (L.)  Nutt.    Common  in  rich  woods. 

Actaea  alba  (L.)   Mill.     Not  infrequent  in  rich  woods. 

Hydrastis  canadensis  L.     In  rich  woods,  rare. 
Magnoliaceae: 

Liriodendron  Tulipifera  L.     In  river-bottoms,  becoming  scarce. 
Anonaceae: 

Asimina  triloba  (L.)  Dunal.    Thickets  and  hillsides,  common. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Piants  of  Boone  County,  Kentucky.  131 

MENISPERM  ACEAE : 

Menispermum  canadense  L.     Thickets  along  streams,  common. 

Berberidaceae  : 

Podophyllum  peltatum  L.    Common  in  rich  woods. 
Jeffersonia  diphylla  (L.)   Pers.     Woods,  common. 
Caulophyllum  thalictroides  (L.)  Michx.     Woods,  infrequent. 

Lauraceae: 

Sassafras  variifolium  (Salisb.)  Kuntze.     In  woods,  becoming  scarce. 
Benzoin  aestivale  (L.)  Nees.     Damp  woods,  not  rare. 

Papaveraceae: 

Sanguinaria  canadensis  L.     Open  woods,  common. 
Stylophorum   diphyllum    (Michx.)    Nutt.     In    rich   woods,   common 
locally. 

FUMARIACEAE: 

Dicentra  Cucullaria  (L.)  Bernh.  Common  in  woods. 
Dicentra  canadensis  (Goldie)  Walp.  With  the  last. 
CorydcUis  flavula  (Raf.)  DC.     Rich  soil,  not  uncommon. 

Cruciferae: 

Lepidium  virginicum  L.    Waste  places  and  fields,  common. 

Capsella  Bursa-pastoris  (L.)   Medic.     Abundant  in  waste  and  culti- 
vated ground. 

Brassica  alba  (L.)   Boiss.     About  dwellings,  infrequent. 

Bra^sica  nigra  (L.)  Koch.     With  the  last,  but  much  more  common. 

Sisymbrium  officinale   (L.)    Scop.  var.  leiocarpum  DC.     Common  in 
fields. 

Hesperis  matronalis  L.    A  rare  escape. 

Radicula  palustris  (L.)  Moench.    Common  on  river-shores. 

Radicula  Armorada  (L.)  Robinson.     An  occasional  escape. 

Barbarea  vulgaris  R.  Br.     Roadsides,  infrequent. 

lodanthus  pinnatifidus  (Michx.)   Steud.     Rich  soil  near  the  river. 

Dentaria  diphylla  Michx.     Woods,  not  common. 

Dentaria  laciniata  Muhl.    Very  common  in  woods. 

Cardamine  bulbosa  (Schreb.)   BSP.     Occasional  in  wet  places. 

Cardamine  Douglassii  (Torr.)   Britton.     Rich  woods  in  early  spring. 

Cardamine  pennsylvanica  Muhl.     Damp  ground,  rather  scarce. 

Arabis  laevigata  (Muhl.)  Poir.     Rocky  woods,  infrequent. 
Capparidaceae: 

Polanisia  graveolens  Raf.     Gravelly  river-shores,  common. 
Crassulaceae: 

Penthorum  sedoides  L.    Muddy  shores,  common. 

Sedum,  tematum  Michx.     Rocky  woods,  common. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


132        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Saxifragaceae: 

Saxifraga  virginiensis  Michx.     Steep  wooded  hillsides,  local. 

Heuchera  americana  L.     Woods  on  moraine,  local. 

Mitella  diphylla  L.     Rich  woods,  common. 

Hydrangea  arborescens  L.     Rocky  hillsides,  infrequent. 

Ribes  floridum  L'Her.     Thickets,  not  common. 
Platan  aceae: 

Platanus  occidentalia  L.     Common  on  river-banks. 
Rosaceae: 

Anlncus  Sylvester  Kost.     Rocky  woods  on  moraine. 

Gillenia  stipulacea  (Muhl.)   Trel.     In  dry  soil  by  roadside  near  Ve- 
rona, 20  miles  from  the  river.     The  only  station. 

Pyrus  Malus  L.    A  frequent  escape  to  thickets  and  roadsides. 

Crataegus  Crus-galli  L.     Infrequent  in  thickets. 

Crataegus  punctata  Jacq.     Open  hillsides,  not  common. 

Crataegus  tomentosa  L.     Very  common. 

(I  did  not  have  the  benefit  of  Eggleston's  thorough  revision 
of  this  genus.  It  is  doubtful  if  tomentosa  as  now  restricted 
occurs  in  Ind.,  and  my  plant,  according  to  Mr.  Deam,  was  prob- 
ably C.  mollis  (T.  &  G.)   Scheele.) 

Fragaria  virginiana  Duchesne.     Common  on  grassy  slopes. 

Potentilla  monspeliensis  L.     Common  in  cultivated  ground. 

Potentilla  canadetisis  L.     Grassy  places,  infrequent. 

Geum  canadense  Jacq.     Borders  of  woods,  common. 

Geum  virginianum  L.    With  the  last. 

Geum  vemum  (Raf.)  T.  &  G.    Common  in  meadows,  etc. 

Rubus  occidentalis  L.    Thickets  and  fence-rows. 

Rubus  allegheniensis  Porter.     Very  common  on  open  hillsides. 

Rubus  villosiis  Ait.    Grassy  open  places,  not  common. 

Agrimonia  gryposepala  Wallr.     Rich  soil  in  thickets,  common. 

Rosa  setigera  Michx.     Borders  of  thickets,  not  common. 

Rosa  rubiginosa  L.     Pastures  and  roadsides,  common. 

Rosa  humilis  Marsh.     In  dry  soil,  scarce. 

Prunu^  serotina  Ehrh.     In  rich  woods,  rather  common. 

Prunus  americana  Marsh.     In  thickets,  frequent. 
Leguminosae  : 

Gymnocladus  dioica  (L.)  Koch.     Rich  woods,  infrequent. 

Gleditsia  triacanthos  L.    Very  common,  especially  in  low  ground. 

Cassia  marilandica  L.    Rich  soil,  common. 

Cassia  Chamaecrista  L.  -  Sandy  river-shores,  not  common. 

Cercis  canadensis  L.    Rich  woods,  common. 

Baptisia  australis  (L.)  R.  Br.    Gravelly  river-shores,  rare. 

Trifolium  pratense  L.     Common  in  meadows,  and  often  cultivated. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Plants  of  Boone  County,  Kentucky.  133 

Tri folium  stoloniferum  Muhl.    Occasional  in  open  ground. 

Trifolium  repens  L.    Abundant  in  meadows. 

Melilotiis  alba  Desr.     Common  on  roadsides  near  the  river,  but  not 
found  farther  inland. 

Robinia  Pseudo-Aea^na  L.    Open  hillsides,  very  common. 

Astragalus  canadensis  L.    Dry  soil,  not  common. 

Desmodium  nudifiorum  (L.)  DC. 

Desmodium  pauciflorum  (Nutt.)  DC. 

Desmodium  canescens  (L.)  DC. 

Desmodium  broA^teosum  (Michx.)  DC. 

Desmodium  Dillenii  Darl. 

Desmodium  paniculatum  (L.)  DC. 

(This  genus  seems  to  be  the  dominant  one  of  the  family  here, 
much  like  Astragalus  in  the  Rocky  Mountain  region  and  Lupinus 
on  the  Pacific  Slope.  All  the  species  are  in  thickets  and  at  the 
borders  of  woods,  and  are  exceedingly  troublesome  on  account  of 
their  burs.) 

Lespedeza  capitata  Michx.    On  moraines,  rare. 

Apios  tuberosa  Moench.    Rich  woods,  common. 

Stropkostyles  helvola  (L.)  Britton.     Abundant  in  river-thickets. 

Amphicarpa  monoica  (L.)  Ell.    Rich  woods,  common. 

OXALIDACEAE: 

Oxalis  violorcea  L.     Rocky  woods,  not  infrequent. 
Oucalis  comiculata  L.     Dry  ground,  very  common. 
Geraniaceae: 

Geranium  maculatum  L.     Open  woods  and  meadows,  common. 

RUTACEAE: 

Zanthoxylum  americanum  Mill.     Rocky  woods,  infrequent. 
SiMABUBACEAE: 

Ailanthv^  glandulosa  Desf.     An  occasional  escape. 
Polygalaceae: 

Poly  gala  Senega  L.     Open,  rocky  soil;  not  common. 
Euphorbiaceae: 

Acalypha  virginica  L.     Fields  and  waste  places,  common. 

Phyllanthus  caroliniensis  Walt.     In  meadows,  rare. 

Euphorbia  Preslii  Guss.    Dry  soil,  common. 

Euphorbia  ma^culata  L.    Open  places,  common. 

Euphorbia  humistrata  Engelm.    Not  uncommon  in  rich  soil. 

Euphorbia  coroUata  L.    Rich  soil,  scarce. 

Euphorbia  dentata  Michx.     In  rich  soil,  not  common. 

Euphorbia  commutata  Engelm.     Dry  woodlands,  not  common. 

Euphorbia  Cyparissias  L.    An  occasional  escape. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


134        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Anacardiaceae: 

Rhus  typhina  L.    Dry  soil,  common. 

Rh\i8  glabra  L.    With  the  last. 

Rhus  copallina  L.    Dry  hillsides,  not  common. 

Rhus  Toxicodendron  L.     Thickets  and  fence-rows,  very  common. 

Celastraceae: 

Evonymus  atropurpureus  Jacq.    Thickets,  common. 

Evonymus  obovatus  Nutt.    Low  ground,  not  common. 

Celastrus  seandens  L.     Common  in  thickets. 
Staphyleaceae: 

Staphylea  trifolia  L.    Damp  thickets,  common. 

ACERACEAE: 

Acer  saccharum  Marsh.     The  commonest  forest- tree  of  the  district. 
Acer  rubrum  L.     Low  woods,  common. 
Acer  Negundo  L.     Low  ground,  common. 
Sapindaceae: 

Aescuhis  glabra  Willd.    Rich  woods,  common. 

Aesculv^  octandra  Marsh.     With  the  last,  but  less  common. 

Balsaminaceae: 

Impatiens  pallida  Nutt.    Along  streams  in  rich  soil,  common. 
Impatiens  biflora  Walt.    With  the  last. 

Vitaceae: 

Psedera  quinquefolia  (L.)   Greene.     Common  in  thickets. 

Vitis  aestivalis  Michx.    Thickets,  common. 

Vitis  cordifolia  Michx.     River-banks,  not  infrequent. 

Tiliaceae: 

Tilia  americana  L.     Rich  woods,  common. 

Malvaceae: 

Abutilon  Theophrasti  Medic.     Common  in  cultivated  ground. 

Sida  hermaphrodita  (L.)  Rusby.    A  single  station  on  river-bank. 

Sida  spinosa  L.    Common  in  cultivated  ground. 

Malva  rotundifolia  L.    Common  about  dwellings. 

Napasa  dioica  L.    A  single  station  on  the  bank  of  Gunpowder  Creek. 

Hibiscus  militaris  Cav.     Wet  river-shores,  not  common. 

Hypericaceae: 

Hypericum  perforatum  L.    In  fields,  common. 

Hypericum  punctatum  Lam.     With  the  last,  but  less  common. 

Hypericum  prolificum  L.     On  moraines,  rare. 

Hypericum  mutilum  L.    Damp  river-shores,  common. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Plants  of  Boone  County,  Kentucky.  135 

ViOLACEAE: 

HyhanthiLs  concolor  (Forster)  Spreng.    Rich  woods,  common. 

Viola  papilionacea  Pursh.    Meadows  and  thickets,  very  common. 

Viola  palmata  L.    Dry  woods,  infrequent 

Viola  pub'escens  Ait.    Rich  woods,  common. 

Viola  canadensis  L.     Rich  woods,  rather  scarce. 

Viola  striata  Ait.     Meadows  and  borders  of  woods,  common. 

Passifloraceae: 

Passi flora  lutea  L.     Thickets,  not  common. 

Lythraceae: 

Rotala  ramosior  (L.)  Koehne.    Wet  river-shores,  common. 
Ammannia  coccinea  Rottb.     With  the  last. 
Ly thrum  alatum  Pursh.     A  single  station  on  the  river-shore. 
Cuphea  petiolata  (L.)  Koehne.     Dry  fields,  common. 

Onagraceae: 

Ludvigia  alternifolia  L.     Damp  river-shores. 

Ludvigia  polycarpa  Short  &  Peter.    With  the  last,  but  less  common. 

Ludvigia  palustris  (L.)   Ell.     Wet  places,  very  common. 

Epilobium  coloratum  Muhl.     Wet  places,  infrequent. 

Oenothera  biennis  L.    Open  places,  common. 

Circaea  alpina  L.     Rich  woods,  common. 

(Since  this  species  is  rare  in  Ind.,  and  C.  lutetiana  L.  very 

common,  I  agree  with  Mr.  Deam  that  my  plant  probably  is  to 

be  referred  to  the  latter  species.) 

Arauaceae: 

Aralia  racemosa  L.    Rich  woods,  infrequent. 

Panax  quinquefolium  L.     Rich  woods,  becoming  rare. 

Umbeluferae: 

Sanicula  marilandica  L.     Open  grround,  common. 

Sanicula  canadensis  L.    Borders  of  woods,  not  so  common  as  the  last. 

Erigenia   bulbosa    (Michx.)    Nutt.     Rich   woods,  common;   the  first 

spring  flower. 
Chaerophyllum  procumhens  (L.)  Crantz.     Moist  woods,  common. 
Osmorhiza  Claytoni  (Michx.)  Clarke.    Rich  woods,  common. 
Cicuta  nuumlata  L.     River-banks,  common. 
Cryptotaenia  canadensis  (L.)  DC.     Shady  places,  common. 
Taenidia  integerrima  (L.)   Drude.     Dry  woods,  infrequent. 
Pastinac'a  sativa  L.     A  common  escape  to  roadsides,  etc. 
Daucus  Carota  L.     An  occasional  escape. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


136        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Cornaceae: 

Comus  florida  L.    Common  in  woods. 

Comus  Amomum  MiU.     River-banks,  infrequent. 

Nyssa  sylvatica  Marsh.    Rich  woods,  infrequent. 

Ericaceae: 

Monotropa  unifiora  L.     Deep  woods,  rare. 
Primulaceae: 

Samolus  floribundua  HBK.    Occasional  in  wet  places. 

Lysimachia  quadrifolia  L.     Moist  soil,  common. 

Lysimachia  terrestris  (L.)  BSP.    Low  ground,  scarce. 

Lysimachia  Nummularia  L.     Escaped  to  roadsides  and  thickets. 

Steironema  ciliatum  (L.)   Raf.     Low  gn^ound,  common. 

Steironema   lanceolatutn    (Walt.)    Gray.      With    the   last,   but  less 
common. 

Anagallie  arvensis  L.     Sandy  fields,  rare. 
Ebenaceae: 

Diospyros  virginiana  L.     Old  fields,  infrequent. 
Oleaceae: 

Fra^inus  americana  L.     Rich  woods,  common. 
Gentianaceae  : 

Gentiana  quinquefolia  L.     Along  streams,  not  common. 

Frasera  carolinensis  Walt.    Dry  hillsides,  rare. 
Apocynaceae: 

Vinca  minor  L.    A  common  escape  abQut  dwellings. 

Apocynum  androsaemi folium  L.    Dry  thickets,  not  infrequent 

Apocynum  cannabinum  L.     Borders  of  woods,  common. 

ASCLEPIADACEAE : 

Asclepias  tuherosa  L.    Dry  soil,  not  common. 

Asclepias  incamata  L.     Wet  places,  common. 

Aaclepias  syriaca  L.     Alluvial  soil,  very  common. 

Asclepias  quadrifolia  Jacq.    Dry  woods,  infrequent. 

Asclepias  verticillata  L.    Open  ground,  common. 

A  cerates  viridiflora  Ell.    Dry  soil,  not  common. 

Gonolobus  laevis  Michx.     River-banks  and  cultivated  ground,  very 

common. 
Vincetoxicum  hirsutum   (Michx.)    Britt.     A  single  station  in  rocky 

oak  woods. 

CONVOLVULACEAE : 

Ipomaea  coccinea  L.    Waste  places,  rare. 
Ipomnea  hederacea  Jacq.     Common  in  cultivated  fields. 
Ipomaea  purpurea  (L.)  Roth.     An  occasional  escape. 
Ipomaea  pandurata  (L.)  Mey.    Occasional  on  dry  river-banks. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


I 

Plants  of  Boone  County,  Kentucky.  137 

Convolvulus  sepium  L.    Along  streams,  common. 

Cu^seuta  arvensis  Beyrich.    Dry  soil  on  various  Compositae,  common. 

Cuseuta  Gronovii  Willd.    River-shores  on  Salix,  common. 

POLEMONIACEAE: 

Phlox  divaricata  L.    Damp  woods,  common. 
Polemonium  rep  tans  L.    Rich  woods,  common. 

H  YDROPHYLLACEAE : 

Hydrophyllum  nuierophyllum  Nutt.    Rich  woods,  common. 
Hydrophyllum  appendieulatum  Michx.    Damp  woods,  common. 
Ellisia  Nyctelea  L.    Damp  thickets,  infrequent. 
PhcLcelia  bipinnatifida  Michx.     Shaded  banks,  common. 
Boraginaceae: 

Heliotropium  indicum  L.    A  single  station  on  sandy  river-shore. 
Cynoglossum  officinale  L.     A  common  weed  in  pastures,  etc. 
Cynoglossum  virginianum  L.    Open  woods,  not  common. 
Lappula    virginiana    (L.)    Greene.      Thickets    and    roadsides,    very 

common. 
Mertensia  virginica  (L.)  Link.    Rich  soil  in  woods,  rather  scarce. 
Lithospermum  arvense  L.     Sandy  roadsides,  not  common. 
Onosmodium  virginianum  (L.)  DC.     Dry  hillsides,  occasional. 
Onosmodium  hispidissimum  Mack.    River-banks,  rare. 

Verbenaceae: 

Verbena  urticasfolia  L.     Thickets  and  roadsides,  common. 

Verbena  hastata  L.    Low  ground,  common. 

(V.  bracteosa  Michx.  was  common  on  the  river-shore  at  Rising 
Sun,  Ind.,  but  was  never  found  on  the  Ky.  side.) 

Lippia  lanceolata  Michx.     Damp  river-shores,  common. 
Labiatae: 

Teu>crium  canadense  L.     Common  in  rich  soil. 

Isanthus  brachiatas  (L.)  BSP.    Dry  soil  on  moraines,  rare. 

Scutellaria  lateriflora  L.    Low  ground,  common. 

Scutellaria  versicolor  Nutt.     Rich  woods,  not  infrequent. 

Scutellaria  canescens  Nutt.    In  woods,  rather  scarce. 

Scutellaria  nervosa  Pursh.    Rich  woods,  not  common. 

Marrubium  vulgare  L.    Dry  soil,  infrequent. 

Agasta^e  nepetoides  (L.)  Ktze.    Borders  of  woods,  common. 

Nepeta  Cataria  L.    Conmion  about  dwellings. 

Nepeta  hederojcea  (L.)  Trevisan.     Shady  places,  common. 

Prunella  vulgaris  L.    Fields  and  meadows,  very  common. 

Synandra  hispidula  (Michx.)  Britt.     Rich  woods,  infrequent. 

Ltconurus  Cardia^a  L.    Waste  places,  common. 

Stachys  tenuifolia  Willd.    Wet  ground,  common. 

Sta^hys  cordata  Riddell.    Dry  thickets,  rather  common. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


I 
138        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Monarda  fistulosa  L.    Dry  ground,  common. 

Blephilia  ciliata  (L.)   Raf.     Borders  of  woods,  not  infrequent 

Blephilia  hirsuta  (Pursh)  Benth.    Moist  thickets,  rare. 

Hedeoma  pulegioides  (L.)  Pers.    Dry  soil,  very  common. 

Melissa  officinalis  L.    An  occasional  escape. 

Lycoptis  virginicus  L.     Moist  soil,  not  infrequent. 

Lyeoptis  americantis  Muhl.    With  the  last. 

Mentha  spicata  L.    An  occasional  escape  in  dry  ground. 

Mentha  piperita  L.    An  occasional  escape  along  streams. 

Cotlinsonia  canadensis  L.    Rich  soil  in  woods,  not  infrequent. 

Solan  acbae: 

Solanum  nigrum  L.     Rich  soil,  common. 
Solanum  carolinense  L.    Sandy  soil,  common. 
Physalis  pubescens  L.    Open  ground,  common. 
Physalis  heterophylla  Nees.     Alluvial  soil,  common. 
Nicandra  PhyscUodes    (L.)    Pers.     A  single  specimen  on   the  river- 
shore. 
Lycium  halimiflorum  Mill.     An  occasional  escape  in  fence-rows,  etc 
Datura  Stramonium  L.     Waste  places,  less  common  than  the  next 
Datura  Tatula  L.    Waste  places,  very  common. 

SCROPHULARIACEAE : 

Verbascum  Thapsus  L.    Dry  fields  and  roadsides,  very  common. 

Verbascum  Blattaria  L.  Open  places,  common.  (Only  the  white- 
flowered  form.) 

Linaria  vulgaris  Hill.     Fields  and  roadsides,  very  common. 

Scrophularia  murilandica  L.  Fence-rows  and  borders  of  woods, 
common. 

Pentstemon  hirsutus  (L.)   Willd.     Dry,  rocky  hillsides;  not  common. 

Pentstemon  laevigatus  Ait.     Rich  soil,  infrequent. 

Chelone  glabra  L.     Low  ground,  not  common. 

Mimulus  ringens  L.     Wet  places,  common. 

Mimulus  alatu^  Ait.     With  the  last,  but  less  common. 

Conobea  multifida  (Michx.)  Benth.  On  muddy  river-shores,  infre- 
quent. 

Ilysanthes  dubia  (L.)  Bamhart.     On  river-shores,  common. 

Gratiola  virginiana  L.     Muddy  places,  common. 

Veronica  Anagallis-aquatica  L.     Wet  places,  rather  scarce. 

Veronica  serpyllifolia  L.     Damp  grassy  places,  common. 

Veronica  peregrina  L.     Cultivated  ground,  common. 

Veronica  arvensis  L.    With  the  last,  and  equally  common. 

Gerardia  flava  L.    Occasional  in  oak  woods. 

Gerardia  tenuifolia  Vahl.     In  a  single  station  on  the  river-shore. 

Pedicularis  canadensis  L.     Moist  banks  on  moraine. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Plants  of  Boone  County,  Kentucky.  139 

Orobanchaceae  : 

Epifagus  virginiana  (L.)  Bart.     Common  in  beech- woods. 
Conopholis  americana  (L.  f.)  Wallr.     In  oak  woods,  scarce. 

BiGNONIACEAE: 

Tecoma  radicans  (L.)  Juss.    Common  on  river-banks. 

Catalpa  bignonioides  Walt.    Occasional  in  thickets  near  the  river. 

ACANTHACEAE: 

Dianthera  americana  L.     Gravelly  river-shores,  scarce. 

Ruellia  dlioaa  Pursh.    In  dry  soil,  not  common. 

Ruellia  strepens  L.    In  rich  soil,  rather  common. 
Phrymaceae: 

Phryma  leptostachya  L.    Deep  woods,  not  infrequent. 
Plantaginaceae  : 

Plantago  major  L.    Door-yards  and  waste  places,  abundant. 

Plantago  lanceolata  L.    In  meadows,  common. 

Plantago  Purshii  R.  &  S.    Sandy  soil,  not  common. 

Plantago  aristata  Michx.     Dry  soil,  scarce. 

Plantago  virginica  L.     Sandy  soil,  not  common. 
Rubiaceae: 

Galium  Aparine  L.    Very  common  in  thickets  and  fence-rows. 

Galium  circaezans  Michx.    In  rich  woods,  not  infrequent. 

Galium  asprellum  Michx.    Rich  soil  in  thickets,  not  common. 

Galium  triflorum  Michx.     Rich  woods,  common. 

Sperma^oce  glabra  Michx.     A  single  station  on  gravelly  river-shore. 

Mitchella  repens  L.    Dry  woods,  not  common. 

Cephalanthus  occidentalis  L.     Common  in  wet  places. 

Hov^tonia  purpurea  L.     Borders  of  woods,  not  common. 
Caprifoliaceae  : 

Lonicera  sempervirens  L.     In  thickets,  not  common. 

Symphoricarpos  orbiculatu^  Moench.     Open  hillsides,  locally  abun- 
dant. 

Viburnum  prunifolium  L.     Open  woods,  not  common. 

Sambucus  canadensis  L.    In  rich  soil,  common. 
Valerianaceae: 

Valeriana  pauciflora  Michx.    Rich  woods,  scarce. 

Valerianella  radiata  (L.)  Dufr.    In  low  ground,  rare. 

DiPSACACEAE: 

Dipsacu^  sylvestris  Huds.    On  barren  hillsides,  locally  abundant. 

CUCURBITACEAE: 

Sicyos  angulatus  L.    River-banks,  common. 

Echinocystis  lobata   (Michx.)   T.  &  G.     With  the  last,  but  less  fre- 
quent. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


140        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Campanulacbae: 

SpeciUaria  perfoliata  (L.)  A.  DC.    In  dry  fields,  common. 
Campanula  americana  L.     Borders  of  thickets  in  rich  soil,  common. 

LOBELIACnBAE: 

Lobelia  cardinalis  L.    Thickets  on  river-shores,  scarce. 
Lobelia  siphiliticfa  L.    Low  ground,  rather  common. 
Lobelia  inflata  L.    Dry  fields,  common. 

COMPOSITAE: 

Vemonia  altissima  Nutt.    Rich  soil  in  pastures,  common. 

Elephantopus  ca/rolinianus  Willd.    Low  ground  along  streams,  scarce. 

Eupaiorium  purpureum  L.     Low  ground,  common. 

Eupatorium  aerotinum  Michx.    Rich  soil,  rather  common. 

Eupaiorium  perfoliatum  L.    Low  ground,  common. 

Eupatorium  urticaefolium  Reichard.    Rich  woods,  common. 

Eupatorium  coelestinum  L.    In  rich  soil,  not  infrequent. 

Solidago  caesia  L.    In  woods,  rare. 

Solidago  ulmifolia  Muhl.    Rocky  oak  woods,  scarce. 

Solidago  lati folia  L.    In  woods,  rather  common. 

Solidago  canadensis  L.    Roadsides  and  pastures,  very  common. 

(Revision  of  this  species  since  the  list  was  first  made  makes 
it  probable  that  this  should  be  referred  to  S.  altissima  L.,  accord- 
ing to  Mr.  Deam.) 

Solidago  rupestris  Raf.     Rocky  river-banks,  rare. 

Solidago  serotina  Ait.    Borders  of  woods,  rather  scarce. 

Solidago  graminifolia  (L.)   Salisb.     Open  hillsides,  infrequent 

Aster  divaricatus  L.    Woods,  scarce. 

Aster  novae-anglia^  L.     Stream-banks,  scarce,  but  common  in  culti- 
vation. 

Aster  patens  Ait.    Thickets,  not  frequent. 

Aster  Shortii  Lindl.    Wooded  banks,  not  common. 

Aster  undulatv^  L.    Thickets,  rather  frequent. 

Aster  cordifolius  L.    Woods,  common. 

Aster  multiflorus  Ait.     Dry,  open  hillsides;  common. 

Aster  vimineus  Lam.    Open  ground,  infrequent. 

Aster  prenanthoides  Muhl.     Along  streams  in  woods,  not  common. 

Aster  umbellatus  Mill.    In  thickets,  scarce. 

Erigeron  pulchellu^  Michx.     Moist  banks,  scarce. 

Erigeron  philadelphicus  L.     Rich  soil,  rather  common. 

Erigeron  annuus  (L.)  Pers.    An  abundant  weed  in  pastures. 

Erigeron  ramosus  (Walt.)   BSP.     Common  in  fields  and  meadows. 

Erigeron  canadensis  L.     A  very  common  weed. 

Pluchea  petiolata  Cass.    Occasional  on  river-shores. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Plants  of  Boone  County,  Kentucky.  141 

Antennaria  plan tagini folia  (L.)   Richards.     Dry  soil,  common. 

(Revision  of  the  original  species  would  probably  throw  my 

plant  into  A.  fallow  Greene,  which,  according  to  Mr.  Deam,  is  very 

common  in  Ind.,  while  he  has  but  one  authentic  record  of  A, 

plantaginifolia  as  now  understood.) 
Gnaphalium  polycephalum  Michx.    Dry  soil,  common. 
Gnaphalium  uliginosum  L.     Not  infrequent  on  river-shores. 
Inula  Helenium  L.    An  occasional  escape  to  pastures,  etc. 
Polymnia  canadensis  L.    Moist  woods,  common. 
Polymnia  canadensis  L.  var.  radiata  Gray.     With  the  last,  but  much 

less  common. 
Polymnia  uvedalia  L.    Fence-rows  and  roadsides,  not  common. 
Silphium  trifoliatum  L.     Dry  banks,  infrequent. 
Silphium  perfoliatum  L.    In  rich  soil  along  streams,  conmion. 
Ambrosia  trifida  L.    Abundant  in  rich  soil. 
Ambrosia  artemisiifolia  L.     A  very  common  weed. 
Xanthium  spinosuw,  L.    Occasional  in  waste  places  near  the  river. 
Xanthium  canadense  Mill.     Sandy  shores  and  fields,  very  common. 
Heliopsis  helianthoides  (L.)  Sweet.     Wooded  banks,  not  frequent. 
Heliopsis  scabra  Dunal.     Open  ground,  more  common  than  the  last. 
Eclipta  alba  (L.)  Hassk.    Muddy  river-shores,  common. 
Rudbeckia  hirta  L.    Occasional  in  grass-land. 
Rudbeckia  laciniata  L.     Thickets  near  river,  rather  infrequent. 
Lepachys  pinnata  (Vent.)  T.  &  G.     In  dry  soil,  not  uncommon. 
HelianthvLs  annuus  L.    An  occasional  escape. 
Helianthus  microcephalus  T.  &  G.    In  rocky  oak  woods,  scarce. 
Heliantkus  tracheliifoliiis  Mill.    In  thickets,  rare. 
Helianthus  tuberosus  L.    An  occasional  escape. 
Actinomeris  altei-nifolia  (L.)  DC.     Rich  soil,  common. 
Bidens  frondosa  L.    Low  ground,  common. 
Bidens  connata  Muhl.     Along  streams,  rather  common. 
Bidens  cernua  L.    Wet  places,  common. 
Bidens  laevis  (L.)   BSP.     River-shores. 

(I  have  never  felt  that  this  was  correct,  because  of  being  so 

far  out  of  range.     Mr.  Deam  thinks  my  plant  was  B,  aristosa 

(Michx.)    Britt.,  which  occurs  on  river-banks  in  many  parts  of 

Ind.) 
Bidens  bipinnata  L.     Rich,  damp  soil;  common. 
Bidens  trichosperma  (Michx.)   Britt.     Frequent  on  river-banks  after 

the  great  flood  of  1884,  but  never  found  above  high-water  mark. 
Galinsoga  parviflora  Cav.    River-shores,  scarce. 
Helenium  autumnale  L.    Low  ground,  common. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


142        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Achillea  Millefolium  L.    A  frequent  escape. 

Antheims  Cotula  L.    Abundant  in  barnyards,  etc. 

Chrysanthemum  Leucanthemum  L.  var.   pinnatifidum  Lecoq  &  La- 

motte.    Common  in  waste  places. 
Tana>cetum  vulgare  L.  var.  crispum  DC.    An  occasional  escape. 
Artemisia  biennis  WiHd.    Not  uncommon  in  waste  places. 
Artemisia  annua  L.     River-banks  and  waste  places,  where  it  was 

common  before  1881,  though  not  mentioned  in  the  Fifth  Edition 

of  Gray's  Manual. 
Erechtites  hieraci folia  (L.)  Raf.    Common  in  clearings. 
Cacalia  svuveolens  L.    Rich  woods,  rare. 
Cacalia  atripliei folia  L.    Woods,  rather  common. 
Senecio  aureus  L.    In  meadows  and  thickets,  locally  common. 
Arctium  minus  Bernh.    An  abundant  and  troublesome  weed. 
Cirsium  lanceolatum  (L.)  Hill.     Very  common  in  pastures. 
Cirsium  discolor  (Muhl.)   Spreng.     Rich  soil,  not  common. 
Cicharium  Intybus  L.    Roadsides,  not  common. 
Krigia  amplexicaulis  Nutt.    Wooded  banks,  not  infrequent. 
Taraxacum  officinale  Weber.     Yards  and  pastures,  abundant. 
Sonchus  oleraceus  L.     Cultivated  ground  near  dwellings,  common. 
Sonchus  asper  (L.)  Hill.     Roadsides  and  waste  ground,  common. 
Lactuca  integrifolia  Bigel.    In  thickets,  not  uncommon. 
Lactuca  villosa  Jacq.    Rich  soil,  frequent. 

Lactuca  spicata  (Lam.)  Hitchc.    With  the  last,  and  equally  common. 
Hieracium  scabrum  Michx.    Common  in  dry  woods. 
Hieracium  Gronovii  L.     Sandy  soil  near  river,  not  common. 

•The  following  species  were  collected  in  the  vicinity  of  Hanover, 
Jefferson  County,  Indiana,  during  the  years  1887-1890,  but  were  never 
found  in  Boone  County,  owing  perhaps  to  the  complete  change  in  geo- 
logical horizon,  although  the  two  districts  are  less  than  sixty  miles  apart : 

Pellaea  atropurpurea  (L.)  Link. 
Camptosorus  rhizophyllus  (L.)  Link. 
Oakesia  sessilifolia  (L.)  Wats. 
Muscari  botryoides  (L.)  Mill. 
Trillium  recurvatum  Beck. 
Hypoxis  hirsuta  (L.)  Coville. 
Orchis  spectabilis  L. 
Habenaria  peramoena  Gray. 
Corallorhiza  odontorhiza  Nutt. 
Aplectrum  hyemale  (Muhl.)   Torr. 
Saururus  cemuus  L. 
Madura  pomifera  (Raf.)   Schneider. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Plants  of  Boone  County,  Kentucky.  143 

Anemone  quinque folia  L. 
Clematis  Vioma  L. 
Magnolia  acuminata  L. 
Sullivantia  Stdlivantii  (T.  AG.)  Britt. 
Hamamelis  virginiana  L. 
Liquidambar  Styraciflua  L. 
Spiraea  tomentosa  L. 
Pyrus  arbutifolia  (L.)  L.  f. 
Amelanchier  canadensis  (L.)  Medic. 
Waldsteinia  fragarioides  (Michx.)  Tratt. 
Rhus  canadensis  Marsh. 
Viola  blanda  Willd. 
Aralia  spinosa  L. 
Thaspium  aureum  Nutt. 
Thaspium  barbinode  (Michx.)   Nutl. 
JJomus  altemifolia  L.  f. 
Obolaria  virginica  L. 
Convolvulus  spithamaeus  L. 
Lamium  amplexicaule  L. 
Salvia  lyrata  L. 
Orobanche  uniflora  L. 
Hou^tonia  caeruleq,  L. 
Triosteum  perfoliatum  L. 
Trios  teum  angusti folium  L. 
Viburnum  a^erifolium  L. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


144        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


Plants  New  to  Indiana.    VIII. 


Chas.  C.  Deam. 


Specimens  of  the  species  reported  are  deposited  in  my  herbarium 
under  the  numbers  given.  The  Gramineae  were  determined  at  the  U.  S. 
Department  of  Agriculture;  the  Carices  by  K.  K.  Mackenzie;  the'Carya 
and  Crataegus  by  C.  S.  Sargent;  the  Viola  and  Rubus  by  Brainerd; 
the  remainder  were  checked  at  Gray  herbarium. 

Pdspalum  supinum  Bosc. 

Greene  County,  August  10,  1918.  No.  26,090.  Near  the  base  of 
a  wooded  beech  slope  about  one  and  one-half  miles  west  of  Stanford. 
Monroe  County,  August  9,  1918.  No.  26,068.  Growing  on  a  slope 
with  Hedeoma  pulegioides  and  Vemonia  altissima  in  a  pasture  field 
about  three  miles  northeast  of  Blooming^n.  Orange  County,  August 
14,  1918.  No.  26,231.  In  a  clover  field  between  Paoli  and  Mitchell. 
Perry  County,  September  24,  1918.  No.  26,735.  Along  a  little  used 
wagon  road  over  the  crest  of  a  wooded  sandstone  ridge  about  eight 
miles  southeast  of  Cannelton^ 
Andropogon  Elliottii  Chapmaru 

Clark   County,  October   30,   1918.     No.   26,865.     On   the   Forest 
Reserve  in  forest  tract  No.  16,  near  the  border  of  the  tract  which 
borders  the  wooded  slope  of  the  "Knobs." 
Panicum  yadkinense  Ashe, 

Perry  County,  June  4,  1918.    No.  25,101.    In  Section  22  of  Union 
Township  at  the  base  of  a  black  oak  slope,  associated  with  Hydro- 
phyllum  macrophyllum,  Tradescantia  virginiana,  etc. 
Zizania  aquatica  L, 

Lagrange  County,  August  30,  1914.  No.  15,045.  In  Pigeon  River 
about  two  miles  east  of  Ontario.  The  base  of  the  plant  in  water. 
Steuben  County,  August  19,  1916.  No.  20,913.  In  shallow  water  on 
the  north  side  of  Lime  Lake.  This  is  the  Zizania  aquatica  of  Lin- 
naeus, not  of  Authors. 
Muhlenbergia  glahriflorus  Scribn. 

Posey  County,  September  21,  1918.  No.  26,645.  Low,  flat  woods 
on  the  south  side  of  Half  Moon  Pond,  which  is  about  ten  miles  south- 
west of  Mount  Vernon. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Plants  New  to  Indiana.  145 

SpoToholtis  canovirens  Nctsh, 

Elkhart  County,  September  13,  1918.     No.  26,362.     On  a  sandy 
knoll  along  the  roadside  two  and  a  half  miles  east  of  Bristol.    Asso- 
ciated with  Andropogon  scoparius,  etc. 
Agro8tis  Elliottiana  Schultes. 

Floyd  County,  May  31,  1917.  No.  23|298.  In  an  alfalfa  field 
along  the  Ohio  River  about  six  miles  west  of  New  Albany.  Lawrence 
County,  May  16,  1918.  No.  24,808.  About  a  quarter  mile  east  of 
Tunnelton  in  an  open  woods  pasture  on  an  exposed  point  of  the  high 
bluff  of  White  River.  Associated  with  Sagina  decumbens,  Rumex 
Acetosella,  Poa  pratensis,  etc. 
Poa  autumnalis  Muhl, 

Clark  County,  May  11,  1913.  No.  12,706.  On  the  Forest  Reserve 
in  a  wooded  ravine  just  north  of  forest  tract  No.  28.  Jackson  County, 
May  15,  1918.  No.  24,762.  Growing  in  the  shade  in  a  flat  woods 
about  five  miles  southwest  of  Seymour.  Associated  with  Fagus, 
Liquidamber,  Nyssa  sylvatica,  Quercus  Michauxii  (Gray's  Manual, 
7th  ed.),  etc.  Jennings  County,  May  14,  1918.  No.  24,748.  In  a 
flat  woods  about  seven  miles  south  of  Vernon.  In  low  ground  with 
Fagus,  Liquidamber,  Impatiens  biflora.  Podophyllum,  etc. 
Bromus  commutatus  Schrad, 

Warrick  County,  June  11,  1918.     No.  25,308.     Common  on  the 
sandy  bank  of  the  Ohio  River  about  one  and  a  half  miles  east  of 
Newburg. 
Scleria  oligantha  Michx. 

Perry  County,  June  3,  1918.    No.  25,069.     Frequent  over  a  small 
area  on  the  dry,  wooded  slope  of  a  spur  of  the  sandstone  ridge  about 
eight  miles  southeast  of  Cannelton.     Associated  with  Quercus  velu- 
tina,  Fagus,  Fraxinus  biltmoreana,  Acer  saccharum,  etc. 
Carex  hormathodes  var,  Richii  Femald. 

Harrison  County,  June  4,  1917.    No.  23,417.    In  a  swampy  woods 
one  and  a  quarter  miles  east  of  Palmyra.     Associated  with  Carex 
Buxbaumii,  Carex  lanuginosa,  etc. 
Carex  Shriveri  Britt. 

Whitley  County,  June  19,  1917.     No.  23,704.     Moist,  sandy  shore 
of  the  north  side  of  New  Lake,  about  ten  miles  northwest  of  Columbia 
City. 
Carya  alba  subcaridcea  Sarg. 

Posey  County,  September  20,  1911.  No.  10,182.  A  large  tree  on 
the  east  bank  of  the  Cypress  Swamp,  about  thirteen  miles  southwest 
of  Mount  Vernon. 

10—16668 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


146        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Carya  Buckleyi  arkansana  Sarg. 

Knox  County,  Augfust  28,  1916.     No.  18,232.     In  the  Knox  sand 
on  the  ridge  just  east  of  what  was  formerly  a  cypress  swamp,  at 
Vollmer,  or  about  two  miles  north  of  Decker. 
Carya  ovalis  var,  obcordata,  fonna  vestita  Sarg, 

Knox  County,  Octgber  5,  1917.     No.  24,144.    A  very  large  tree  in 
a  low  woods  bordering  Dan's  Pond,  which  is  14.3  miles  southwest  of 
Decker. 
Rynchospora  comiculata  (Lam.)  Gray,  var,  interior  Femald, 

Harrison  County,  October  13,  1916.     No.  22,407.     In  a  swampy 
woods  one  and  a  quarter  miles  east  of  Palmyra.     Associated  with 
Carex  louisianica,  etc. 
Polygonum  exsertum  SmxUl. 

Greene  County,  October  2,  1917.     No.  24,082.     In  low  ground  at 
the  edge  of  a  field  where  it  borders  Horseshoe  Pond,  about  three 
miles  southeast  of  Lyons.    Associated  with  Chamaesyce  Preslii,  Eupa- 
torium  serotinum,  Cyperus  sp.,  etc. 
Calycocarpum  Lyoni  (Pursh)  NutL 

Posey  County,  October  13,  1917.  No.  24,323.  Wooded  border  of 
a  slough  about  twelve  miles  southwest  of  Mount  Vernon.  Also  noted 
as  common  on  the  wooded  bank  of  the  east  side  of  the  cypress  swamp 
about  thirteen  miles  southwest  of  Mount  Vernon.  Spenc^  County, 
June  8,  1918.  No.  25,210.  In  anthesis  at  this  time.  A  common  vine 
in  a  slough  about  six  miles  southwest  of  Rockport,  climbing  trees 
and  shrubs  to  a  height  of  eight  to  twelve  feet.  Noted  also  in  Perry 
County  about  eight  miles  southeast  of  Cannelton,  but  no  specimen 
was  preserved. 
Barbarea  vema  (Mill.)  Aschers. 

Jefferson  County,  May  1,  1918.    No.  24,582.     Frequent  along  the 
roadside  and  rocky  adjoining  bluff  of  the  Ohio  River  about  two  miles 
west  of  Madison. 
Crataegus  arduennae  Sargent. 

Allen  County,  May  31,  1915.     No.  15,834.     A  large  tree  on  the 
south  bank  of  the  St.  Mary's  River  just  south  of  Fort  Wayne. 
Crataegus  conjuncta  Sargent. 

Wells  County,  May  12,  1915.     No.  15,625.     On  the  border  of  a 
pond  in  a  white  oak  woods  on  the  south  side  of  the  lake  in  Jackson 
Township. 
Crataegus  Dodgei  Ashe. 

Lagrange  County,  May  17,  1915.  No.  15,662.  Roadside,  about 
one  mile  northwest  of  Howe.  Wells  County,  May  12,  1915.  No. 
15,624.     A  tree  ten  feet  high  and  one  and  a  quarter  inches  in  diam- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Plants  New  to  Indiana.  147 

eter  breast-high  on  the  border  of  a  pond  in  a  white  oak  woods  on 
the  south  side  of  the  lake  in  Jackson  Township. 

Ruhus  Bailey  anus  x  Enslenii. 

Vanderburg  County,  May  10,  1917.  No.  22,894.  In  clay  soil  on 
the  slope  of  a  roadside  cut  about  one  mile  west  of  Darmstadt. 

Lathyrus  latifolius  L, 

Lawrence  County,  August  13,  1918.  No.  26,215.  In  the  vicinity 
of  the  site  of  the  former  dwelling  house  and  in  the  deep  adjoining 
woods  on  the  Donaldson  farm,  about  three  miles  southeast  of  Mitchell. 
There  has  been  no  dwelling  here  for  at  least  fifteen  years,  and  the 
plant  has  spread  into  the  orginal  forest,  where  several  large  colonies 
were  noted.  It  is  to  be  noted  that  Vinca  minor  has  invaded  the 
original  forest  here  and  forms  a  complete  mat  over  several  acres 
and  is  fast  spreading  in  the  dense  forest. 

Viola  hirsutula  x  missouriensis. 

Clark  County,  May  30,  1917.  No.  23,261.  On  the  slopes  of  a  wooded 
ridge  two  miles  northwest  of  Bennettsville.  Associated  with  Quercus 
Prinus  (Gray's  Man.,  7th  ed.),  Quercus  velutina,  Quercus  alba, 
Pinus  virginiana,  Houstonia  caerulea,  etc.  Prefers  to  grow  in  hard 
clay  in  exposed  places. 

Viola  missouriensis  Greene, 

Clark  County,  May  30,  1917.  No.  23,261.  On  a  wooded  slope  two 
miles  northwest  of  Bennettsville,  associated  with  the  preceding. 
Daviess  County,  May  3,  1917.  No.  22,667.  In  a  low,  flat  woods  one 
mile  west  of  Plainville.  Also  along  the  roadside  six  miles  southeast 
of  Elnora.  Gibson  County,  May  6,  1917.  No.  22,809.  In  a  low,  flat 
woods  three  miles  northwest  of  Patoka.  Greene  County,  May  2, 
1917.  No.  22,654.  In  alluvial  soil  along  a  creek  four  miles  north- 
west of  Bloomfield.  Knox  County,  May  6,  1917.  No.  22,741.  In  a 
low  woods  on  the  border  of  Claypole  Pond  about  eleven  miles  south- 
west of  Decker.  Associated  on  the  border  of  Claypole  Pond  with 
Quercus  palustris,  Ulmus  americana,  Liquidamber,  Phlox  divaricata, 
etc.  Owen  County,  May  1,  1917.  No.  22,622.  Alluvial  bank  of  Eel 
River  on  the  road  between  Coal  City  and  Worthington.  Vigo  County, 
May  12,  1917.  No.  22,934.  Alluvial  soil  along  the  bank  of  Wabash 
River,  three  miles  west  of  Prairieton. 

Viola  missouriensis  x  sororia, 

Knox  County,  May  3,  1917.  No.  22,681.  In  a  sandy  black  and 
white  oak  woods  two  miles  east  of  Bicknell.  Also  taken  in  a  sandy 
black  and  white  oak  woods  four  miles  southeast  of  Vincennes.  Sul- 
livan County,  May  11,  1917.  No.  22,913.  In  a  wooded  creek  bottom 
two  miles  west  of  Sullivan.    Tippecanoe  County,  May  16,  1917.    No. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


148        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

23,061.  Frequent  on  the  white  oak  slope  of  the  Wabash  River  terrace 
just  north  of  the  Soldiers*  Home.  Vanderburg  County,  May  10,  1917. 
No.  22,895.  In  a  black  and  white  oak  woods  one  mile  west  of  Dann- 
stadt. 

Viola  missouriensis  x  triloba. 

Daviess  County,  May  3,  1917.  No.  22,679.  Low  woods  one  mile 
west  of  Plainville.  Abundant  here  and  associated  with  Ulmus  ameri- 
cana,  Betula  nigrra,  Quercus  bicolor.  Phlox  divaricata,  Claytonia  vir- 
grinica,  Cardaraine  bulbosa,  etc.  Greene  County,  May  2,  1917.  No. 
22,640.  Associated  with  oak  at  the  top  of  a  beech  slope  about  ten 
miles  southeast  of  Bloomfield.  Also  in  a  sandy  woods  one  mile  north 
of  Newberry.  Associated  with  Fagus,  Sassafras,  Quercus  alba, 
Quercus  velutina.  Podophyllum,  Polygonatum  biflorum,  etc.  Knox 
County,  May  6,  1917.  No.  22,733.  In  a  low  woods  bordering  Claypole 
Pond,  about  eleven  miles  southwest  of  Decker.  Lawrence  County, 
June  8,  1917.  No.  23,556.  In  an  old  fallow  field  about  three  miles 
southeast  of  Mitchell.  Associated  with  Rubus  Enslenii,  Panicom 
commutatum.  Sassafras,  etc. 

Viola  viarum  Pollard, 

Knox  County,  May  6,  1917.  No.  22,719.  In  moist,  sandy  soil 
along  the  railroad,  about  four  miles  south  of  Vincennes.  Closely 
associated  with  Viola  affinis  and  Viola  sororia. 

Decodon  verticillatua  laevigatus  T,  &  G, 

Jackson  County,  August  16,  1913.  No.  14,025.  In  a  bog  about 
a  half  mile  south  of  Chestnut  Ridge.  Lagrange  County,  August  29, 
1914.  No.  14,979.  On  the  west  shore  of  Twin  Lakes.  Lake  County. 
August  23,  1915.  On  the  east  shore  of  Cedar  Lake.  Owen  County, 
September  22,  1917.  No.  23,874.  On  the  shore  of  Stogdill  Pond, 
about  four  miles  southeast  of  Spencer. 

Oenothera  triloba  Nutt, 

Jefferson  County,  May  1,  1918.  No.  24,580.  Common  on  a 
washed,  sterile,  sparsely  wooded  slope  of  the  bluff  of  the  Ohio  Rhrcr 
just  east  of  Madison.  Associated  with  Opuntia  Rafinesque,  Plantago 
virgfinica,  etc.  A  specimen  of  this  species  was  sent  me  from  Wash- 
ington County  in  June,  1917,  from  near  Salem,  by  W.  H.  Rudder. 
Oenothera  triloba  parvifiora  Wats,  was  reported  in  Coulter's  Cata- 
logue for  Blatchley  from  Monroe  County,  but  Blatchley's  original 
manuscript  of  the  flora  of  Monroe  County  does  not  give  this  species, 
but  doei  give  Oenothera  biennis  parvifiora.  In  Coulter's  Catalogue 
the  species  was  reported  under  a  revised  nomenclature,  and  it  i* 
believed  an  error  was  made  in  transferring  it.  Therefore  it  is  here 
proposed  to  drop  from  our  flora  Oenothera  triloba  var.  parviflora, 
which  is  as  yet  known  only  from  the  area  west  of  the  Mississippi. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Plants  New  to  Indiana.  149 

Oxydendrum  arboreum  (L)  DC. 

VevTY  County,  June  3,  1918.  No.  25,071.  A  few  trees  on  the 
lower  slope  of  a  beech-sugrar  maple  spur  of  the  sandstone  wooded 
ridge  about  eight  miles  southeast  of  Cannelton.  The  largest  tree 
was  about  six  inches  in  diameter  breast-high  and  about  forty  feet 
high.  This  species  was  closely  associated  with  Fagus,  Cornus  florida, 
Nyssa  sylvatica,  etc. 
Styrax  americana  Lam. 

Posey  County,  June  15,  1918.    No.  25,420.    Frequent  in  a  swampy 
place  in  a  fiat  woods  about  ten  miles  southwest  of  Mount  Vernon. 
A  shrub  four  to  six  feet  high.     Associated  with  Cephalanthus  occi- 
dentalb  and  the  next. 
Trachelospermum  difforvie  (Walt.)  A.  Gray. 

Posey  County,  June  15,  1918.  No.  25,442.  A  vine  climbing  a 
button-bush  to  a  height  of  six  feet,  in  a  swampy  place  in  a  low,  fiat 
woods  about  ten  miles  southwest  of  Mount  Vernon.  Closely  asso- 
ciated with  the  last.  This  plant  was  detected  by  the  fragrance  of 
its  flowers,  which  could  easily  be  smelled  for  a  rod  distant. 
Myoaotis  micrantha  Pallas. 

Parke  County,  May  24,  1918.    No.  25,037.    A  common  weed  about 
the  Administration  Building  in  Turkey  Run  State  Park. 
H^deoma  hispida  Pursh. 

Putnam  County,  June  24,  1915.     No.  1,094.     Collected  by  Earl  J. 
Grimes   in  a  barren   pasture  field   four  miles   east  of  Russellville. 
Uncommon. 
lAnaria  minor  (L.)  Desf. 

Vigo  County,  July  5,  1918.    No.  25,791.    Frequent  in  ballast  along 
the  Vandalia  Railroad  at  the  Haeckland  switch,  about  four  miles 
southeast  of  Atherton. 
Veronica  Toumifortii  Gmelin. 

Wells  County,  July  16,  1917.  No.  23,761.  Common  in  the  lawn 
of  Geo.  T.  Kocher  on  South  Main  street,  Bluffton.  Also  common  in 
a  lawn  on  East  Cherry  street,  Bluffton.  This  weed  was  kept  under 
observation  in  1918,  and  it  appears  that  the  lawn  mower  does  not 
stop  its  progress,  and  it  should  be  regarded  as  an  aggressive  weed. 
TJtricula/ria  cleistogam^i  (Gray)  Britt. 

This  record  was  founded  on  a  sheet  in  the  Schneck  herbarium 
which  is  now  in  my  herbarium.  I  had  the  specimen  examined  by 
Dr.  J.  H.  Barnhart,  a  specialist  on  this  genus,  and  he  says  it  is 
Utricularia  gibba;  that  it  is  small  and  depauperate  because  it  devel- 
oped late  in  the  season.  It  is  here  proposed  to  drop  this  species  from 
our  flora. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


150        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Lonicera  japonica  Thunb. 

Clark  County,  September  7,  1915.  No.  18,770.  Roadside  half  a 
mile  south  of  Charleston.  In  this  county,  near  Sellersburg,  this 
species  was  noted  where  it  had  invaded  a  clearing  and  had  formed 
a  complete  mat  over  an  acre.  It  climbed  all  of  the  shrubs  of  the 
area  and  was  bending  them  down.  This  vine  is  already  recognized 
in  several  counties  as  a  great  pest.  Floyd  County,  June  8,  1913. 
No.  13,216.  Common  along  the  roadside  about  three  miles  west  of 
New  Albany.  Jefferson  County,  May  28,  1911.  Frequent  on  the 
rocky  bluffs  of  the  Ohio  River  between  Madison  and  North  Madison. 
Perry  County,  May  19,  1918.  No.  24,910.  Sandy  roadside  two  and 
a  half  miles  north  of  Tobinsport.  A  veritable  pest  here.  Posey 
County,  July  5,  1915.  No.  16,852.  Roadside  one  mile  northeast  of 
Poseyville. 

Aster  macrophyllus  var,  ianthinus  (Burgess)  FemalcL 

Clark  County,  September  12,  1917.  No.  23,794.  On  a  white  oak 
ridge  on  the  Forest  Reserve. 

Eupatorium  incamatum  Walt. 

Perry  County,  September  24,  1918.  No.  26,732.  Along  a  woods 
road  over  the  crest  of  the  wooded  sandstone  ridgre  about  eight  miles 
southeast  of  Cannelton.  Noted  also  near  a  spring  at  the  base  of  the 
bluffs  of  the  Ohio  River  about  six  miles  east  of  Cannelton. 

Taraxicum  erythrospermum  Anderz, 

I  thought  this  species  had  been  reported  many  years  ago,  but  I 
find  no  mention  of  it.  It  no  doubt  is  found  in  lawns  and  fields  in 
all  parts  of  the  State.  I  have  specimens  from  the  following  counties: 
Grant  County,  May  23,  1916.  No.  19,804.  Roadside  nine  miles  east 
of  Marion.  Huntington  County,  May  24,  1916.  No.  19,774.  Common 
in  an  open  woods  pasture  two  miles  south  of  Mount  Etna.  Jasper 
County,  May  8,  1916.  No.  19,419.  Abundant  along  the  Pennsylvania 
Railroad  about  two  miles  east  of  Goodland.  Newton  County,  May  8, 
1916.  No.  19,397.  Frequent  in  a  blue-grass  pasture  about  one  and 
a  half  miles  east  of  Brook.  Noble  County,  May  12,  1916.  No.  19,624. 
Moist,  sandy  shore  of  the  east  side  of  Diamond  Lake.  Porter  County, 
May  10,  1916.  No.  19,496.  In  sandy  soil  along  roadside  two  and  a 
half  miles  south  of  Valparaiso.  Randolph  County,  May  16,  1916. 
No.  19,630.  Abundant  in  beech  woods  pasture  five  miles  north  of 
Winchester.  St.  Joseph  County,  May  10,  1916.  No.  19,548.  Along 
roadside  eight  miles  west  of  South  Bend.  Wells  County,  May  23, 
1916.  No.  19,814.  In  an  open  woods  about  three  miles  south  of 
Mount  Zion.  Noted  also  in  many  places  in  the  county  and  very 
common  in  lawns.  In  many  places  it  is  more  common  than  the  other 
species  of  dandelion,  especially  in  sandy  soil. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Analyses  of  One  Hundred  Soils  in  Allen  County, 

Indiana. 


R.  H.  Carr  and  V.  R.  Phariis,  Purdue  University. 


The  soils  of  Indiana  present  about  as  varied  types  and  are  as  diflFer- 
ent  in  fertility  as  any  that  can  be  found.  They  include  such  famous 
areas  as  the  sand  dunes  about  Valparaiso,  the  peppermint  fields  of 
Mishawaka,  and  the  limestone  country  about  Bedford.  There  is  quite  a 
difference  in  soils  not  only  between  neighboring:  counties  but  even  be- 
tween adjacent  farms,  differences  which  the  casual  observer  seldom 
notices,  because  to  him  all  soils  look  alike  and  are  "just  dirt." 

Calung  the  "Soil  Doctor." 

Soils  are  usually  studied  only  after  a  series  of  failures  of  wheat, 
clover,  etc.,  and  the  question  naturally  arises,  "Why  can  I  not  grow 
crops  like  father  used  to?"  It  is  at  this  stage  of  the  soil's  depletion 
that  the  "soil  doctor"  is  called  often  to  prescribe  for  the  sick  soil.  The 
ability  of  the  doctor  to  diagnose  the  case  through  analysis  has  been 
overestimated  somewhat  in  the  popular  mind.  Nevertheless  it  usually 
g^ves  the  best  answer  as  to  why  the  wheat  or  clover  failed  to  do  well. 
Of  all  the  soils  investigated  in  this  county  by  the  writers,  it  was  found 
that,  where  the  physical  conditions  permitted,  the  crop  yield  was  closely 
related  to  the  amount  of  organic  matter  and  plant  food  present,  as  shown 
in  the  graphs  which  follow. 

Value  of  Soil  Analysis.  "* 

One  reason  for  the  questioning  by  many  scientific  men  the  value  of 
analysis  as  a  means  of  measuring  fertility,  is  the  varying  results  in 
pot  and  field  work  and  the  inability  to  correlate  or  interpret  the  results 
with  the  known  composition  of  the  soil.  The  conflicting  results  are 
often  due  to  artificial  surrounding  conditions  or  to  the  use  of  seed  of 
variable  vitality,  etc.  Hence  it  was  the  puri)ose  of  this  investigation  to 
visit  the  growing  plant,  especially  com,  in  its  natural  home  and  there 
seek  the  reason  of  its  good  growth  or  the  cause  of  its  failure. 

Plan  op  Investigation. 

All  the  soils  studied  were  secured  in  Allen  County.  They  are  of 
glacial  origrin,  70%   belonging  to  the  Miami  series  and  18.5%  to  the 

(151) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


152        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 


fir-  •/    i* 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Analyses  of  One  Hundred  Sails. 


153 


ClT<i#  series.  The  samples,  100  in  all,  were  taken  from  all  parts  of  the 
county  and  from  the  various  soil  types.  Many  conditions  were  noted 
when  the  samples  were  taken  (September,  1917),  as  the  condition  of 
the  crops,  prevalent  weeds,  trees,  etc.  Information  as  to  the  use  of 
lime  fertilizer,  crop  yield,  was  obtained  from  the  man  in  charge  of  the 
farm.  The  following  data  was  obtained  by  analysis:  First,  amount 
of  volatile  orgranic  matter;  second,  per  cent  of  phosphorus;  third,  per 
cent  of  nitrogen;  fourth,  presence  of  carbonates  and  acidity  of  the  soil 
to  litmus  paper.  The  data  from  these  soils  is  recorded  in  the  tables 
which  follow: 

Discussion  of  Tables. 

It  will  be  noticed  from  the  tables  that  there  are  many  soils  of  this 
county  quite  high  in  organic  matter,  only  11%  being  below  4%,  while 
45  Vr  range  from  4  to  T'^/  ;  SI  7c  range  from  7  to  IbVc,  and  6%  are  above 
that  amount.  It  might  be  expected  that  this  high  organic  content  would 
carry  a  considerable  amount  of  nitrogen,  and  this  was  found  to  be  the 
case.  Every  per  cent  of  increase  in  org^anic  matter  carried  with  it  an 
increase  of  519  pounds  of  nitrogen  and  72  pounds  of  phosphorus  per 
acre.  This  is  much  less  phosphorus  than  is  to  be  expected  in  these 
soils,  and  in  most  cases  they  would  respond  profitably  to  an  application 
of  that  fertilizer.  It  is  shown  in  Charts  1  and  2  that  nitrogen  has  more 
to  do  with  high  com  yield  than  phosphorus.  There  is  a  serious  lack  of 
calcium  carbonates  in  over  half  of  the  soils  tested;  559^  are  acid  to 
litmus.  This  condition  makes  a  good  clover  stand  nearly  impossible 
and  is  the  main  cause  of  "clover  sickness"  frequently  reported. 

TABLE  I. 
Organic  Matter  0  to  4%-    Nitrogen  and  PkoaphoruB  Content. 


Sample 

Per  Cent. 
Organic 
Matter 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbe.  per 

No. 

Acre 

Nitrogen 

Acre 

Phosphorus 

Acre 

25 

2.19 

43.800 

.0714 

1.428 

.0827 

1.654 

3« 

4.00 

80,000 

.1834 

3.668 

.0781 

1.562 

as" 

1.66 

33.200 

.2226 

4.452 

.0660 

1.320 

14" 

1  75 

35.000 

.2002 

4.004 

.0946 

1,892 

16* 

3.40 

68.000 

.1106 

2.212 

.0410 

1,820 

17* 

4.00 

80,000 

.2122 

4,244 

.0990 

1,978 

235 

3.81 

76,200 

.0840 

1,680 

.0754 

1,508 

27° 

3.66 

73,200 

.1414 

2,828 

.0722 

1,444 

285 

4.01 

80,200 

.0980 

1.960 

.0930 

1.860 

45* 

3.72 

74,400 

.2525 

5.a50 

.0740 

1.480 

475" 

3.47 

69,400 
68.433 

.2240 

4.480 
3,667 

.0800 

1.600 
1.696  a  ve. 

This  ^roup  oonstitutes  11%  of  total. 
•—Acid  condition. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


154        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


TABLE  II. 
Organic  Matter  4  to  6%.    Nitrogen  and  Pkoapkorut  Content  of  Tkit  Group. 


Sample 

Per  Cent. 
Organic 
Matter 

Lbe.per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbe.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbs.  per 

No 

Acre 

Nitrogen 

Acre 

Phosphorus 

Acre 

V   ' 

AM 

91.200 

.1792 

3.584 

.0822 

1,644 

78 

5.04 

100. OOO 

.1064 

2.128 

.0647 

1.291 

ir 

4.70 

94.000 

.4270 

8,540 

.0585 

1.170 

13 

4.80 

96,000 

.2534 

5,064 

.1131 

2.262 

198' 

4  29 

85.800 

.3038 

6.076 

.0552 

1.104 

26« 

4.97 

99.400 

.0602 

1.204 

.0808 

1.616 

32' 

4.91 

98.200 

.1570 

3,140 

.0848 

1.696 

33 

4  53 

90.600 

.1428 

2,856 

.0808 

1.616 

35' 

4.91 

98,200 

.2030 

4.060 

.0849 

1.688 

36' 

4.11 

82.200 

.1470 

2.940 

.0808 

1.616 

378 

4.91 

98.200 

.1498 

2.996 

.0808 

1,616 

418" 

4.43 

88,600 

.1939 

3.878 

.0740 

1.480 

Sfts" 

4.78 

95.600 

.1386 

2.772 

.0657 

1.314 

658 

4.75 

95.000 

.0798 

1.596 

.0983 

1.966 

148* 

4.03 

80,600 

.0900 

1.800 

.0552 

1,104 

92,914 

• 

4.312 

1,671  ai*. 

a — Subsoil.    This  group  con.stitutoe  15%  of  total. 
*— Acid  condition. 


TABLE  III. 
Organic  Matter  5  to  6%.     Nitrogen  and  Pkoapkorua  Content  of  Group. 


Sample 

Per  Cent. 
Organic 
Matter 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Ctfnt. 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbs.  per 

No. 

Acre 

Nitrogen 

Acre 

Phosphorus 

Acre 

9' 

5.49 

109.800 

.1624 

3,248 

.0754 

1,508 

15 

5.17 

103.400 

.2688 

5,376 

.0768 

1.536 

18" 

5.72 

114.400 

.1909 

3,818 

.0916 

1.832 

20' 

5.20 

104,000 

.1764 

3.528 

.0935 

1.870 

31" 

5  21 

104.200 

.1796 

3.592 

.0889 

1.778 

34* 

5.57 

111,400 

.1746 

3.482 

.0795 

1.590 

358" 

5.60 

112.000 

.2058 

4.116 

.0687 

1.374 

388 

5.22 

104,400 

.1232 

2.464 

.0970 

1.940 

62" 

5.04 

100,800 

.2366 

4.732 

.0949 

1.898 

648 

5.14 

102,800 

.1274 

2.548 

.1360 

2.720 

67" 

5  41 

108,200 

.1092 

2,184 

.1104 

2.304 

67s 

5.21 

104.200 

.0952 

1,904 

.1063 

2.126 

44" 

5.91 

118.200 

.1890 

3.780 

.0957 

1.914 

53 

5.46 

109,200 

.3052 

6.104 

.1582 

3.164 

25" 

5.23 

104,600 
108.018 

.1820 

2,640 
3.658 

.0808 

1.616 
1,764  »▼«. 

8 — Subsoil.    This  group  constitutes  15%  of  total. 
" — Acid  condition 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Analyses  of  One  Hundred  Soils. 


155 


TABLE  rv. 
Organic  Matter  6  to  7%.     Nitrogen  and  Phoapkorut  Content  of  Group. 


Sample 

Per  Cent. 
Oricanic 
Matter 

Lbs.  per 

Percent. 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbs.  per 

No. 

Acre 

Nitroeen 

Acre 

Phosphorus 

Acre 

2» 

6.08 

121.600 

.2226 

4,452 

.1147 

2.294 

to 

6.33 

126.600 

.1008 

2,016 

.0741 

1.482 

23* 

6.25 

125.000 

.2184 

4.368 

.1066 

2.132 

26* 

6.99 

139,800 

.0644 

1.288 

.1082 

2.164 

60b* 

6.49 

129.800 

.2100 

4.200 

.0902 

1.804 

«2b- 

6.06 

121,200 

.1848 

3,696 

.0687 

1,374 

64 

6.00 

120.000 

.1604 

3.388 

.1360 

2.720 

70' 

6.93* 

138,600 

.1484 

2.968 

.1010 

2,020 

41 

6.63 

132.600 

.3164 

6.328 

.0701 

1,402 

43* 

6.62 

132.400 

.2254 

4.508 

.2760 

5,520 

438* 

6.89 

137,800 

.0840 

1,680 

.0625 

1,250 

51  • 

6.95" 

139,000 

.1890 

3.780 

.0943 

1,886 

52* 

6.77« 

135,400 

.1512 

3.024 

.1010 

2,020 

55 

6.10 

122.000 

.2380 

4.760 

.1002 

2,004 

81* 

6.39 

127.800 
130.309 

.2212 

4,424 
3.935 

.0833 

1.266 
2,312 

8 — SubBoil.    This  group  constitutes  15%  of  total. 
• — Acid  condition. 


TABLE  V. 
Organic  Matter  7  to  9%.    Nitrogen  and  Pkoapkorua  Content  of  Group. 


Sample 

Per  Cent. 
Organic 
Matter 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbe.per 

No. 

Acre 

Nitrogen 

Acre 

Phoephorus 

Acre 

7" 

7.19 

143.800 

.3136. 

6.270 

.0016 

1.832 

19 

7.37 

147.400 

.2828 

5,656 

21 

7.46 

149.200 

.2590 

5.180 

.1065 

2.130 

28- 

7  45 

149,000 

.2576 

5.152 

.0983 

1.966 

65- 

7.63' 

152.600 

.1974 

3.948 

.1320 

2,640 

49' 

7.78- 

155,600 

.2766 

5.532 

.0746 

1.492 

50 

7.07- 

141,400 

.2100 

4,200 

.0956 

1,912 

8 

8.79 

175.800 

.3094 

6.188 

.0867 

1,734 

4s 

8.67 

173.400 

.2026 

4.052 

.1119 

2.238 

47 

8.57' 

171,400 

.3220 

6.440 

.1015 

2.030 

52b 

8.84' 

176,800 

.0826 

1.652 

.0741 

1,482 

54s 

8.97° 

179.400 

.1604 

3.208 

.0680 

1.360 

56 

8.46' 

169,200 

.2716 

5.432 

.0956 

1.912 

708 

8.63 

172,600 

.0840 

1.680 

.0875 

1,750 

728 

8.18* 

163.600 

.0826 

1,652 

.0875 

1.760 

22* 

8.29 

165.800 

.2926 

5.852 

.1441 

2,882 

24* 

8.28 

165,600 

.2226 

4.452 

.1199 

2.398 

29 

8.67 

171,400 
158.323 

.2828 

5,656 
5,366 

.0983 

1,966 
2,074  ave. 

8— Subsoil.    This  group  constitutes  18%  of  total. 
" — Acid  omdition. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


156        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


TABLE  VI. 
Organic  Matter  9  to  11%.     Nitrogen  and  Pkotpkorut  CotUetU. 


s— Sub!>oil.    Thifl  group  constitutes  10%  of  the  totul. 
"—Acid  condition. 


TABLE  Vn. 
Organic  Matter  Jl  to  15%.    Nitrogen  and  Phosphorus  Content. 


-Subsoil.    This  group  constitutes  9%  of  total 
-1,000.000  lbs.  per  acre  6^3  ms. 
—Acid  condition 


TABLE  VIH. 
Organic  Matter  from  15  to  79%.     Nitrogen  and  Phosphorus  Content  0/ Group. 


s — Sub'<oiI.    This  group  constitutes  6%  of  total. 
♦— 1,0(X).000  lbs.  per  acre  6N  ma. 
* — Acid  condition. 


Sample 

Percent. 
Organic 
Matter 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbtper 

No. 

Acre 

Nitrogen 

Acre 

Phosphorus 

Acre 

5" 

9.62 

192.400 

.3127 

6.254 

1322 

2.644 

6 

9  10 

182.000 

.3746 

7.492 

.0970 

1.940 

39 

9.60 

192.000 

.2940 

5.880 

.1227 

2.454 

54 

9.29 

195,800 

.2912 

5,824 

.1536 

3.072 

38 

9.F0 

198.000 

.3312 

6.624 

.1146 

2,292 

4 

10  32 

206.400 

.5012 

10.024 

.1350 

2.718 

67' 

10.00 

200,000 

.3808 

7.616 

.1110 

2,220 

60 

10.34 

206,800 

.3038 

6,076 

.1150 

2.300 

72 

10.44 

208.800 

.1876 

3,752 

.1027 

2,QU 

50s 

10.10 

202.000 
196,911 

.1218 

2.435 
6,615 

.0647 

1,294 
2.410  svt 

Sample 

Percent. 
Organic 
Matter 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbs.  per 

1     Per  Cent. 

Lha  per 

No. 

Acre 

Nitrogen 

Acre 

'   Phosphorus 

1 

Acre 

40 

11.07 

221,400 

.3780 

7,560 

1 

.1165 

2,3» 

48 

11.07 

221.400 

.1386 

2.772 

i        .1038 

2.076 

66 

11.15 

223.000 

.2562 

5,124 

1        .1027 

2.064 

58 

12.07 

241,400 

.2786 

5,572 

'        .0916 

1.832 

63« 

12.21 

244.200 

.2968 

5,936 

'        .1388 

2.776 

lOs 

12.62 

252,400 

.3248 

6.496 

1        .0983 

1.966 

59 

12.86 

257,200 

.3858 

7.716 

'        . 1616 

3.233 

46 

13.65 

273.000 

.4998 

9,996 

1         .2810 

5.620 

30 

14.26 

285.200 

.4284 

8.568 
6.655 

.1145 

1 

1 

2.290 

245,850* 

2, 779  ave. 

Sample 
No 

Per  Cent. 
Organic 
Matter 

Lbs.  per 
Acre 

Per  Cent. 
Nitrogen 

Lbs.  per 
Acre 

Per  Cent. 
Phosphorus 

Lb«.  per 
Acre 

698 

10 

69 

71 

12 

718" 

17.80 
21.45 
24.82 
66  86 
70.36 
78.25 

356.000 
429.000 
496.400 
668.600 
703.600 
782.500 

.0596 
.4656 
.6496 
.5936 
.9184 
.4172 

1.192 
9.312 
12,992 
5.926 
9.184 
4.172 

9.356 

.1037 
.1065 
.1621 
.1017 
.1555 
.0855 

2.074 
2.130 
3.242 
1.017 
1.5&5 
855 

674. 400* 

l.OM 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Analyses  of  One  Hundred  Soils. 


157 


Plofc    I 

R&lahon  of  hifrocfen  ib  Crop 
Yield 


- 

A 

*» 

r  ^. 

-J^^  ^ 

r      ■  -0^ 

u  vV4  r 

j'^V_  (t/ 

.-,          4 

^        - 

.1 

t 

j 

0       »*iS     ^        *        ^        X        S        T        8        5        to       11       M 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


158        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


Plate    E 

Relation   of  Rho9f>horu»  to  Crop 
Yield 


& 

2 

' 

w 

• 

i 

^ 

-v 

'     A 

\l   - 

"^ 

---J 

..^ 

I 

«•>    / 

yv 

"^ 

■* 

/ 

H 

p 

n 

J 

7 

]2 

«««o 

Pct/ncfj  /^**'    Acre 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Analyses  of  One  Hundred  Soils, 


159 


Plate  m 

Ret  of  ton  of  Organic  Ma#er  +o  Yield 


yJGPoo      9oo-        M50'         eoo'        rsc.o 

'P9uf9d9    tfyir/y/c    Mmifer   Pitr   \%r^ 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


160        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


The  Relation  of  Nitrogen,   Phosphorus  and  Organic 
Matter  to  Corn  Yield  in  Elkhart  County,  Indiana. 


R.  H.  Carr  and  Leroy  Hoffman,  Purdue  University. 


The  fertility  of  the  soil  is  so  closely  related  to  the  progrress  of  a 
community  that  any  considerable  increase  in  the  productiveness  of  the 
soil  from  any  cause  is  reflected  in  greater  community  prosperity.  It  is 
therefore  important  to  study  the  soil  and  its  needs. 

Invoice  of  the  Soil. 

Just  as  an  invoice  of  the  stock  of  goods  in  a  store  aids  the  merchant 
in  estimating  his  resources,  so  an  invoice  of  the  plant  food  in  the  soil 
enables  the  farmer  to  get  a  rating  of  his  possible  crop  yield  and  enables 
him  to  plan  intelligently  for  future  soil  improvement.  A  supply  of  plant 
food  does  not  necessarily  insure  a  good  crop  yield,  as  there  are  present 
sometimes  counteracting  conditions.  Examples  of  such  are  found  in 
Samples  1,  10  and  51.  But  these  are  usually  evident,  and  the  data  to 
be  presented  shows  that  crops  are  generally  produced  where  there  is 
present  sufficient  plant  food. 

Release  of  the  Soil's  Food  Supply. 

The  soil  is  composed  of  small  fragments  of  rock  particles  mixed  with 
more  or  less  organic  matter  in  various  stages  of  decay.  Only  a  small 
part  of  the  plant  food  in  the  rock  particles  is  available  at  any  time. 
It  is  thought  that  the  food  elements  contained  in  these  rock  particles 
alone,  are  not  liberated  fast  enough  from  year  to  year  to  produce  a 
paying  crop.  This  is  not  so,  however,  with  that  stored  in  organic  mat- 
ter, especially  the  fresh  organic  matter,  which  not  only  releases  its  plant 
food  rather  rapidly,  through  bacterial  action,  but  also  aids  materially 
in  freeing  that  tied  up  in  the  rock  particles  of  the  soil.  In  view  of  this 
important  part  played  by  soil  organic  matter,  it  was  thought  best  to 
classify  all  soils  collected  according  to  the  amount  of  organic  matter 
they  contained. 

Plan  of  Invoicing. 

The  samples  of  soil  (total  57)  from  eleven  soil  types  were  collected 
late  in  September,  1917,  in  order  to  estimate  more  accurately  the  pos- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Relation  of  Nitrogen. 


161 


sible  com  yield  of  that  year.  Much  data  was  obtained  relative  to  fer- 
tilizer treatment,  kinds  of  weeds  prevalent,  the  use  of  limestone,  and 
especially  the  approximate  crop  yield  as  estimated  by  the  man  in  charge 
of  the  farm.  The  following  determinations  were  made  on  soil  samples: 
First,  total  organic  matter;  second,  total  nitrogen;  third,  total  phos- 
phorus ;  fourth,  presence  of  carbonates  and  acidity  to  litmus  paper.  The 
tables  which  follow  will  give  a  partial  composition  in  per  cent  and 
pounds  per  acre  (6.66  ins.  2,000,000  lbs.),  together  with  the  yield  of 
com  per  acre  where  the  samples  were  secured: 


TABLE  I. 
Content  of  Nitrogen,  Pkoapkcrua  and  Acre  Yield.    Otot%  Organic  Matter. 


Sample 

Bushels  of 

Per  Cent. 
Organic 
Matter 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbe.per 

No. 

Corn 

Acre 

Nit. 

Acre 

Phoe. 

Acre 

32 

18 

1.75 

35.000 

.095 

1.910 

.062 

1,242 

33 

0 

1.32 

26.400 

.070 

1.400 

.079 

1.580 

34 

0 

.99 

19.800 

.039 

785 

.073 

1.460 

35 

10 

1.47 

29.400 

.030 

612 

.116 

2.322 

14 

27.660 

1.177 

1.661  ave. 

TABLE  IL 
Content  of  Nitrogen,  Pkoapkonu  and  Acre  Yield,    t  to  J^%\Organic  Matter. 


Sample 
No. 


Bushels  of 
Com 


Per  Cent. 
Orsnnic 
Matter 


Lbs.  per 
Acre 


Per  Cent. 
Nit. 


Lbs.  per 
Acre 


Per  Cent. 
Phoe. 


Lbs.  per 
Acre 


2x 

13x 

14 

16x 

15x 

18 

26z 

27x8 

35v 

39x 

.56 

5V8 


30 
40 


35 
40 
35 


40 
15 


2.53 
3.12 
3.36 
3.25 
3.62 
3.48 
3.30 
2.58 
2.51 
3.67 
2.23 
3.79 


50,600 
62.400 
67.200 
65,000 
72.400 
69.600 
66.0(X) 
51,600 
50,200 
73.400 
44.600 
75.800 

62,400 


.105 
.113 
.110 
.101 
.140 
.105 
.091 
.073 
.066 
.105 
.087 
.157 


2.100 

.210 

4.212 

2,267 

.098 

1.960 

2.204 

.135 

2,700 

2.030 

.078 

1,666 

2.800 

.089 

1,782 

2.100 

.108 

2.160 

1.820 

.012 

2.056 

1.466 

.124 

2.480 

1.330 

.135 

2,700 

2.100 

.129 

2,592 

1.750 

.480 

2,970 

3,150 

.132 

2.656 

2.093 

2.486  ave. 

X — Soil  acid. 
V — ^Virgin  soil, 
s — Subwil. 


11—16568 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


162        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


^^ 


Reproduction  of  Soil  Biap  made  by  U.  8.  Bureau  of  Soils  of  Klkhart-  County,  showing  arcan  of  difTerent  type  and 

places  where  samples  were  taken. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Relation  of  Nitrogen. 


163 


TABLE  III. 
Content  of  Nitrogen,  Phoaphorus  and  Acre  Yield.    4  to  6%  Organic  Matter. 


Sample 

BushelB  of 

Per  Cent. 
Organic 
Matter 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbs.  per 

No. 

Corn 

Acre 

Nit. 

Acre 

Phos. 

Acre 

3 

40 

4.63 

02.600 

.140 

2.800 

.135 

2,700 

9b 

4.03 

80,600 

.077 

1,540 
2,160 

.095 

1.906 

12 

20 

4  73 

94.600 

.108 

.113 

2.268 

25z 

35 

4.53 

90.600 

.152 

3,050 

.116 

2,322 

40x 

40 

4.46 

89.200 

.140 

2,800 

.243 

4,860 

45z 

30 

4.08 

81.600 

.098 

1.860 

.078 

1,586 

46z 

50 

4.89 

97.800 

.124 

2.485 

113 

2,278 

47x 

30 

4  70 

94,000 

.150 

3.000 

.086 

1,728 

53 

4  53 

90.600 
82,000 

098 

1,900 

.107 

2,140 

54 

40 

4.10 

.097 

1,942 

.103 

2,060 

35.5 

89,360 

2.359 

2.385  aye. 

X— Acid  roil, 
s — Subeoil. 


TABLE  rV. 
Content  of  Nitrogen,  Phoaphorus  and  Acre  Yield.    6  to  8%  Organic  Matter. 


Sample 
No 

Bushels  of 
Com 

Per  Cent. 
Organic 
Matter 

Lbs.  per 
Acre 

Per  Cent. 

Nit. 

Lbs.  per 
Acre 

Per  Cent. 
PhoB. 

Lbs.  per 
Acre 

4 
6z 
17v 

35 
35 

5.20 
6.45 
5.08 
5.94 
5.71 
5.75 
5.85 
5.75 
5.01 
5.90 

104,000 
100.000 
101,600 
118.800 
114,200 
116,000 
117.000 
115.000 
100,200 
118,000 

111.280 

.161 
.100 
.186 
.141 
.098 
.122 
.175 
.129 
.119 
.144 

3.220 
2.000 
3,720 
2.834 
1,960 
2,450 
3,450 
2,580 
2,380 
2,880 

2.748 

.221 
.099 
.108 
.121 
.129 
.162 
.189 
.421 
.087 
.119 

4.428 
2.000 
2,160 

24 

36z 

41x 

49 

50 

52 

40 
0 
50 
60 
30    . 

2.430 
2,592 
3,240 
3,780 
4,212 
1.755 

55 

45 

42.14 

2.380 
2,898  a  ve. 

X— Acid 
V — ^Virgi 

soil, 
nsoil. 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


164        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

TABLE  V. 
Content  of  Nitrogen^  Pkotphorua  and  Acre  Yield.    6  to  8%  Organic  Matter. 


Sample 

BushelB  of 

Per  Cent. 
Organic 
Matter 

Lb«.  per 

Percent. 

Lbs.  per 

Per  Cent. 

Lbeper 

No. 

Cora 

Acre 

Nit. 

Acre 

Ph06. 

AciT 

6 

50 

7.20 

144.000 

.210 

4.200 

.145 

2.916 

7 

75 

7.05 

141.000 

.252 

5.040 

.272 

5.454 

8 

35 

7.10 

142.000 

.171 

3.420 

.094 

1.890 

IQx 

15 

6.60 

132,000 

.157 

3,140 

.105 

2.106 

22x 

40 

6.87 

137.400 

.157 

3,150 

.183 

3.672 

2ta 

15 

6.13 

122.600 

.098 

1.969 

.094 

1,880 

30v 

7.02 

140.400 

.119 

2.380 

.113 

2,278 

37x 

45 

6.10 

122,000 

.132 

2,650 

.188 

3.760 

38| 

30 

6.12 

122.400 

.165 

3,305 

.097 

1,944 

421 

55 

7.39 

147.800 

.192 

3.840 

154 

2.916 

Iz 

0 

7.46 

149,200 

.260 

5.200 

.270 

5.400 

31x 

35 

7.qp 

141,200 

.140 

2.800 

.143 

2.862 

48 

40 

7.11 

142.200 

.210 

4.200 

.124 

2.483 

40.45 

137,200 

3.484 

3.043  ave. 

X— Acid  soil. 
V — Virgin  soil. 


TABLE  VI. 
Content  of  Nitrogen,  Pkoepkonig  and  Acre  Yield.    8  to  10%  Organic  Matter. 


Sample 
No. 

BiuhelB  of 
Cora 

Per  Cent. 
Organic 
Matter 

Lbs.  per 
Acre 

Percent. 
Nit. 

Lbs.  per 
Acre 

Per  Cent. 
Phoe. 

Lbs.  per 
Acre 

llx 

21 

23 

65 
80 
55 

66.6 

8.52 
8.37 
8.35 

170,400 
167.400 
167,000 

168.233 

.218 
.252 
.226 

5,260 
5.040 
4.524 

4.941 

.116 
.216 
.197 

2.322 
4.320 
3.942 

3.52S  ave. 

X— Add 

»oU. 

TABLE  VII. 
Content  of  Nitrogen,  Phoaphorua  and  Acre  Yield.    10  to  16%  Organic  Matter. 


Sample 
No 

BushelB  of 
Cora 

Percent.        t  h«  n<.r 
Organic          ^Acrf 
Matter            ^^^« 

Per  Cent. 
Nit. 

Lbe.  per 
Acre 

Percent. 

PhOB. 

Lbeper 
Acre 

43 
44 

51x 

60 
65 
0 

10.04 
13.00 
12.54 

200,800 
260.000 
250,800 

237.200 

.297 
.267 
.434 

5.950 
5,346 

8.680 

6.659 

.180 
.240 
.259 

3.780 
4.800 
5.184 

4.588  ave. 

X — ^Acid  soil. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Relation  of  Nitrogen, 


165 


TABLE  VIII. 
Content  of  Nitrogen,  Pkospkorut  and  Acre  Yield.    15  to  85%  Organic  Matter, 


Sample 
No. 

Bushela  of  1   ^w?!?^        Ll>«.  por* 
0-on«      ;     ^ter             Acre 

Per  Cent. 
Nit. 

Lbs.  per 
Acre 

Per  Cent.       Lbs.  per 
Phos               Acre 

19x 
20x 

Onions              78.16 
Onions              81  18 

781,800* 
811.800 

2.800 
3.010 

28,000 
30.100 

29.050 

.398 
.426 

3,980 
4.260 

, 

796,700 

4.120  Bve. 

•— Wt.  muck  soil,  1,000.000  lbs.  per  acre  6  ^s  ma. 
X — Arid  soil. 

Discussion  of  Results. 

About  50%  of  the  soils  of  Elkhart  County  are  of  the  Miami  loam 
and  Miami  sandy  loam  types,  and  about  279^  are  of  the  Plainfield  sandy 
loam  type.  These  soils  are  rather  low  in  organic  matter  and  51%  are 
acid.  The  crop  yield  as  given  by  the  man  in  charge  of  the  farm  and 
corroborated  as  to  the  possible  yield  when  the  samples  were  secured 
bears  a  close  relation  to  the  organic  matter  present,  and  this  in  turn  is 
closely  associated  with  the  amounts  of  nitrogen  and  phosphorus  present. 
There  were  only  three  samples — 1,  10  and  51 — which  were  exceptions 
to  the  general- rule  that  high  plant  food  content  equals  good  com  yield. 
Sample  1  is  a  greenish  ferrous  iron  soil  turning  brown  when  exposed 
to  air  on  plowing.  Sample  10  is  a  sandy  soil,  low  in  potassium.  There 
may  be  other  causes  also  for  the  com  on  this  soil  turning  yellow  when 
it  is  about  two  or  three  feet  high.  The  reason  for  the  poor  yield  of 
Sample  51  has  not  been  investigated.  Summarizing  the  data  in  Tables 
1-6,  relating  to  plant  food  content  and  corn  yield,  it  is  noted  that  the 
difference  in  yield  between  the  0-2%  and  the  8-10%  organic  matter 
averages  25.6  bushels.  Using  this  figure  as  a  standard  for  organic 
matter  increase,  it  is  shown  that  on  average  field  conditions  for  every 
increase  of  2,672  pounds  of  organic  matter,  71.6  pounds  of  nitrogen  and 
35.7  pounds  of  phosphorus  per  acre  (2,000,000  pounds)  there  is  an 
increase  of  one  bushel  of  corn. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


166        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 


Flame  Reactions  op  Thallium. 


Jacob  Papish,  Purdue  University. 


The  terms  spectra  of  the  first  and  of  the  second  order  were  given  by 
Pliiker  and  HittorT  to  what  are  known  now  as  band  and  as  line  spectra. 
Mitscherlich'  proved  that  the  channeling  of  the  band  spectrum  is  due  to 
the  existence  of  a  compound  of  a  metal  in  the  flame,  while  the  line  spec- 
trum is  produced  by  the  elementary  metal.  When  halogen  compounds 
of  barium  are  introduced  in  the  Bunsen  flame  they  produce  their  own 
fugitive  spectra,  but  on  dissociation  in  the  flame  they  all  exhibit  the 
band  spectrum  of  barium  oxide  and  also  the  x-line  (=5535.69)  of  the 
metal.  Mitscherlich's  work  points  to  the  fact  that  the  final  spectrum 
produced  by  a  halogen  salt  of  barium  is  the  result  of  a  chemical  change 
that  had  been  undergone  by  the  salt  in  question. 

The  well-known  luminescence  of  a  flame  charged  with  compounds  of 
sodium  is  undoubtedly  due  to  the  existence  of  metallic  sodium  in  the 
flame.  MendeleelT  arrived  at  this  conclusion  from  the  following  experi- 
ments: If  hydrochloric  acid  gas  be  introduced  into  a  flame  colored  by 
sodium  it  is  observed  that  the  sodium  spectrum  disappears,  owing  to  the 
fact  that  metallic  sodium  cannot  remain  in  the  flame  in  the  presence  of 
an  excess  of  hydrochloric  acid.  The  same  thing  takes  place  on  the 
addition  of  ammonium  chloride,  which  in  the  heat  of  the  flame  gives 
hydrochloric  acid.  If  a  porcelain  tube  containing  sodium  chloride  (or 
sodium  hydroxide  or  carbonate) ,  and  closed  at  both  ends  by  glass  plates, 
be  so  powerfully  heated  that  the  sodium  compound  volatilizes,  then  the 
sodium  spectrum  is  not  observable ;  but  if  the  salt  be  replaced  by  sodium, 
then  both  the  bright  line  and  the  absorption  spectra  are  obtained,  ac- 
cording to  whether  the  light  emitted  by  the  incandescent  vapor  be 
observed,  or  that  which  passes  through  the  tube.  Thus  the  above  spec- 
trum is  not  given  by  sodium  chloride  or  other  sodium  compound,  but  is 
proper  to  the  metal  sodium  itself.  If  every  salt  of  sodium,  lithium  and 
potassium  gives  one  and  the  same  spectrum,  this  must  be  ascribed  to 
the  presence  in  the  flame  of  the  free  metals  liberated  by  the  decompo- 
sition of  their  salts. 

Reference  has  been  made  from  time  to  time  to  the  fact  that  free 


>  Phil.  Trans.  1885.  166. 

3  Posts:.  Ann.  116,  419  (1862)  ;  121,  459  (1868). 

'"Principles  of  Chemistry",   1,  663   (1891). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Flame  Reactions  of  Thallium,  167 

carbon  is  found  in  the  ordinary  luminous  flames'  and  that  the  lumi- 
nescence is  due  to  this  carbon.  Heumann'  pointed  out  that  when  a  feebly 
luminous  hydrocarbon  flame  be  charged  with  chlorine  or  with  bromijie, 
the  luminosity  of  the  flame  is  greatly  increased.  The  chemical  activity 
of  chlorine  and  of  bromine  brings  about  the  separation  of  carbon,  which, 
on  incandescence,  increases  the  luminosity  of  the  flame. 

While  investigating  the  structure  of  luminous  flames,  Smithells' 
proved  that  free  carbon  is  found  in  the  luminous  portion  of  a  hydro- 
carbon flame.  His  conclusion,  which  is  in  agreement  with  the  view  of 
Kersten,^  is  that  the  separation  of  carbon  in  a  flame  is  due  simply  to  the 
decomposition  of  the  hydrocarbon  by  heat.  He  also  asserts  that  the 
glow  of  carbon  in  the  luminous  region  is  due  to  the  heat  of  its  own 
combustion,  and  is  increased  probably  by  the  concomitant  combustion  of 
hydrogen.  Smithells*  also  succeeded  in  precipitating  copper  from  a 
flame  charged  with  cupric  chloride. 

Hodgkinson*  obtained  a  deposit  of  sulphur  from  a  moderate-sized 
sulphur  flame. 

Bancroft  and  Weiser,'  who  experimented  with  a  number  of  metallic 
salts,  proved  that  these  salts  dissociate  at  the  temperature  of  the  Bunsen 
flame,  of  the  hydrogen-air  flame  and  of  the  oxyhydrogen  flame,  the 
metals  being  set  free. 

Papish"*  investigated  the  behavior  of  compounds  of  selenium  and  of 
tellurium  in  the  Bunsen  flame  and  in  the  hydrogen-air  flame.  Elemen- 
tary selenium  and  tellurium  can  be  easily  obtained  by  depressing  the 
flames  with  a  cold  object. 

In  all  cases  mentioned  above  the  luminescense  can  be  traced  back  to 
the  existence  of  an  elementary  substance  in  the  flame.  In  some  cases 
a  particular  luminescence  is  due  to  the  existence  or  formation  of  a 
certain  compound  in  a  given  zone  of  the  flame.  The  work  described  in 
this  paper  was  undertaken  with  the  purpose  of  throwing  more  light  on 
the  nature  of  flame  reactions  in  general  and  of  the  reactions  of  thallium 
in  particular. 

Thallous  Chloride  in  the  Bunsen  Flame, — "Chemically  pure"  thallous 
chloride  was  distilled  and  redistilled  in  a  hard  glass  tube.     The  flnal 

^Hilgard:  Liebie'e  Ann.  92.  129  (1854):  Liebig's  Jahresb.  1854.  287;  Landlot: 
VoK9.  Ann.  99,  389    (1856). 

»Chem.  Centrb.  1.     1876.  801. 
»Jour.  Chcm.  Soc.  51.  223  (1892). 
-•J.  prak.  Chem.  84,  290   (1861). 
5  Phil.  Mag.   (5)   39.  127   (1895). 
«Chem.  News  61.  96   (1890). 
'Jour.  Phys.  Chcm.  18.  259   (1914). 
*«  Ibid.  22,  430  (1918)  ;  Ibid.  p.  640. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


168        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


product,  which  consisted  of  fine  crystals,  fused  to  a  clear  liquid  on  heat- 
ing and  sublimed  without  leaving  any  residue.  On  examination  by 
means  of  the  spectroscope  it  was  found  to  give  the  thallium  line  and 
very  faint  sodium  lines.  This  salt  was  introduced  in  a  hard  glass  tube, 
one  end  of  which  was  drawn  to  a  capillary  and  inserted  in  a  small  hole 
bored  in  the  stem  of  a  Bunsen  burner.  The  other  end  of  the  tube  was 
connected  with  the  air  blast.  A  very  slow  current  of  air  was  turned 
on,  the  burner  was  lighted,  and  the  thallous  chloride  in  the  hard  glass 
tube  was  heated  to  volatilization.  The  vapors  of  this  salt  on  entering 
the  flame  imparted  to  it  the  characteristic  thallium  green  color.  On 
depressing  the  flame  with  a  cold  object,  such  as  an  evaporating  dish, 
a  metallic  mirror  of  a  brownish  appearance  was  obtained.  That  this 
mirror  was  due  to  the  deposition  of  thallium  was  proved  by  moistening 
it  with  a  drop  of  hydrochloric  acid  and  impinging  a  Bunsen  flame  on  it; 
the  characteristic  green  color  flashed  up. 

Thallous  Chloride  in  the  Hydrogen-Air  Flame, — Resublimed  thallous 
chloride  was  placed  in  a  hard  glass  tube  provided  with  a  platinum  tip. 
Hydrogen,  generated  from  zinc  and  sulphuric 
acid  and  washed  through  a  solution  of  silver 
nitrate,  was  passed  through  the  tube  and 
igniited  above  the  platinum  tip.  The  thallous 
chloride  was  now  heated  with  a  flattened 
Bunsen  flame.  The  flame  of  the  burning  hydro- 
gen, on  becoming  charged  with  the  vapors  of  the 
thallium  salt,  was  seen  to  consist  of  a  long,  slen- 
der inner  cone,  deep  green  in  color,  surrounded 
by  a  film  which  was  almost  colorless.  The  middle 
cone,  which  constituted  the  main  part  of  the 
flame,  was  green  for  about  two- thirds  of  its 
length,  its  lower  third  being  blue.  The  outer 
cone,  which  formed  the  tip  of  the  flame,  was  of 
an  intense  green  color.  The  terms  inner,  middle 
and  outer  cones  are  used  for  the  purpose  of  sim- 
plifying the  description  of  the  flame.  Reference 
to  the  accompanying  diagram  will  show  that  in 
practice  the  flame  consists  of  five  different  zones, 
each  zone  having  its  own  characteristic  lumi- 
nescence. On  depressing  the  inner  zone  (a)  with 
a  cold  object  a  lustrous  dark  metallic  mirror  of 
a  brownish  tinge  was  obtained.  But  no  deposit 
of  thallium  was  obtained  when  the  part  of  the 
flame  above  the  inner  zone  was  depressed. 


Diattiani  of  the  |[y<lroi?en- 
Air  Flarne  cha'-Ke  1  with 
Thallous  Chloride, 
a,  deep  Kreen;  h,  almost  rol- 
filrr 


orless  film: 
o,  deep  green, 


blue;  d.  green; 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Flame  Reactions  of  Thallium,  169 

Conclusions. 

Thallous  chloride,  when  introduced  in  the  Bunsen  flame,  dissociates, 
yielding  the  metal.  This  metal  can  be  condensed  on  a  cold  object  in 
the  form  of  a  brownish  mirror.  The  characteristic  luminescence  of  the 
flame  is  to  be  traced  to  the  existence  of  the  free  metal  in  it. 

When  the  hydrogen-air  flame  is  charged  with  the  vapor  of  thallous 
chloride,  five  different  zones,  each  disting^uishable  by  a  different  lumi- 
nescence, can  be  observed.  A  lustrous  metallic  mirror  of  a  brownish 
tinge  can  be  obtained  on  a  cold  object  by  depressing  the  inner  cone  of 
the  flame.  The  luminescence  here  again  is  to  be  traced  to  the  element 
thallium.  No  deposit  of  thallium  is  obtained  when  the  cold  object  is 
introduced  in  the  outer  zone;  the  luminescence  in  this  region  is  undoubt- 
edly due  to  the  formation  of  an  oxide  or  oxides  of  thallium. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


170        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 
Sulphur  Dioxide  as  a  Source  of  Volcanic  Sulphur. 


Jacob  Papish,  Purdue  University. 


The  reaction  expressed  by  the  equation  H>S  +  S0«  =  HaO  +  2S  was 
investigated  by  Cluzel^  as  far  back  as  1812.  This  reaction  was  accepted 
by  geologists  and  chemists^  as  being  back  of  the  origin  of  volcanic  sul- 
phur: hydrogen  sulphide  and  sulphur  dioxide  gases,  escaping  from  vents 
and  fumarolesy  come  in  contact  and  bring  about  the  formation  of  sul- 
phur. Brun'  opposes  this  theory  of  the  orig^in  of  sulfatara  sulphur,  and 
he,  in  turn,  is  opposed  by  others.  The  reader  is  referred  to  the  literature 
on  geochemistry  for  details.* 

In  case  of  sulphur  deposition,  where  hydrogen  sulphide  is  detected 
as  a  volcanic  exhalation,  it  is  supposed  that  the  sulphur  is  formed  as  a 
result  of  the  partial  oxidation  of  the  hydrogen  sulphide.' 

While  investigating  the  flame  reactions  of  the  sulphur  group  of 
elements,  I  noticed  that  when  a  mixture  of  sulphur  dioxide  and  illu- 
minating gas  is  heated  in  a  glass  tube,  an  opalescence  is  produced 
due  to  the  precipitation  of  sulphur.  Illuminating  gas  is  a  mixture 
of  different  reducing  gases,  and,  on  the  whole,  the  reaction  resembles 
the  one  described  by  Berthelot,*  which  is  expressed  by  the  equation 
SQa  +  2C0  =  2C0a  +  S.  Since  volcanic  exhalations  contain  carbon 
monoxide,  as  well  as  methane  and  hydrogen,  then  why  not  suppose  that 
volcanic  sulphur  is  formed  from  sulphur  dioxide  through  a  reaction  of 
reduction,  say,  with  carbon  monoxide?  The  sulphur  thus  formed  will 
have  to  cool  and  condense  before  it  comes  in  contact  with  oxygen,  other- 
wise it  will  burn  back  to  sulphur  dioxide.  Some  means  of  sudden  cool- 
ing is  especially  favorable  for  its  formation  instantly  upon  reduction 
from  sulphur  dioxide.  Such  a  means  is  to  be  found  in  the  case  of  the 
sulphur  recovered  from  Lake  Ponto,  which  is  a  crater  lake  in  the  south- 
western part  of  Kunashiri  Island,  Japan.'  The  water  of  this  lake  is 
strongly  acid*  and  has  a  temperature  of  40°  C.     Around  the  margins 

1  Ann.  Chim.  Phys.  84,  162  (1812)  :  Jour.  Phys.  Chem.  15,  1   (1911). 

^  Ries'  "Economic  Geolo{fy",  4th  ed.,  p.  293  ;  Roscoe  and  Schorlemmer*s  "Treatise 
on  Chemistry"  1,  365  (1905)  ;  Erdmann's  "Lehrb.  anorg.  Chemie",  2nd  ed.,  p.  236   (1900). 

"Chem.  Zeit.  15,  127   (1909). 

'  Clarke's  "Data  on  Geochemistry",  3rd  ed.,  pp.  270  and  576. 

i^Habermann:    Zeit.  f.  anorg.  Chem.  38,  101    (1904). 

•Compt.  rend.  96.  298   (1888). 

7  Y.  Oinouye:    Jour,  of  Geology  24,  806  (1916). 

'Professor  Oinouye,  in  a  private  communication  dated  April  29.  1918,  informs  me 
that  the  water  smells  of  sulphur  dioxide. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Sulphur  Dioxide.  171 

through  innumerable  small  fissures  sulphur  is  deposited,  and  the  country 
rock  is  strongly  impregnated  with  it.  The  amount  of  gas  emitted  is 
ordinarily  not  very  great,  but  is  increased  enormously  when  the  at- 
mospheric pressure  is  low.  During  periods  of  crater  activity,  paroxys- 
mal eruptions  of  gas  and  water  are  noticed  near  the  center  of  the  lake 
at  intervals  of  from  one  to  three  hours,  and  whenever  the  bubbling 
begins,  workmen  row  to  the  spot.  By  means  of.  a  pulley  attached  to  a 
framework  resting  upon  two  boats,  the  men  lower  an  iron  bucket  in  the 
center  of  the  bubbling  area  to  the  bottom  of  the  lake.  When  the  bucket 
is  withdrawn  it  is  practically  filled  with  sulphur  grains.  In  this  man- 
ner, while  the  crater  is  active,  a  hundred  buckets  of  sulphur  are  easily 
brought  up  in  a  day.  This  sulphur  is  for  the  most  part  dark  grey  in 
color  and  consists  of  oolitic  grains. 

The  process  of  sulphur  deposition  just  desAibed  is  not  to  be  taken 
as  typical,  and  Oinouye  himself  remarks^  that  the  production  of  sulphur 
in  crater  lakes  is  very  unusual  even  in  sulfatara  sulphur  fields.  But 
^his  particular  process  illustrates  strikingly  the  possibility  of  sulphur 
coming  from  sulphur  dioxide.  The  fact  that  the  water  of  Lake  Ponto 
is  charged  with  sulphur  dioxide  bears  unmistakable  evidence  of  the 
existence  of  this  gas  as  a  volcanic  exhalation.  Its  reduction  to  elemen- 
tary sulphur  can  be  assumed  to  take  place  through  its  interaction  with 
carbon  monoxide,  which  is  very  commonly  found  in  volcanic  exhalations 
together  with  other  reducing  gases.  The  freshly  formed  sulphur  cools 
suddenly  on  coming  in  contact  with  the  water  in  the  lake  and  condenses 
in  the  form  of  oolitic  grains. 

The  theory  set  forth  in  this  paper  is  not  meant  to  displace  other 
accepted  theories  on  the  origin  of  sulphur,  but  rather  to  supplement 
them.  No  one  theory  can  explain  the  orig^in  of  the  different  deposits  of 
sulphur;  each  deposit  has  to  be  dealt  with  separately,  and  it  is  hoped 
that  some  cases  of  sulphur  deposition  can  be  explained  on  the  basis  of 
this  theory. 

The  study  of  the  origin  of  sulphur  was  undertaken  at  the  suggestion 
of  Dr.  W.  N.  Logan  of  Indiana  University,  to  whom  my  sincerest  thanks 
are  due. 


Since  this  note  has  been  written  an  article  by  J.  B.  Ferguson 
appeared  on  "The  Equilibrium  Between  Carbon  Monoxide,  Carbon  Di- 
oxide, Sulphur  Dioxide  and  Free  Sulphur."*  Mr.  Ferguson  states  that 
he  undertook  his  work  with  the  purpose  to  shed  some  light  on  the  role 
of  sulphur  gases  in  volcanic  activity. 

*  Loc.  cit. 

2  Jour.  Amer.  Chem.  Soc.  40,  1626   (1918). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


172        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 
The  Occurrence  of  Coal  in  Monroe  County. 


W.  N.  Logan,  Indiana  University. 


(A  Preliminary  Report.) 

The  occurrence  of  coal  in  small  outcrops  has  been  known  for  three 
quarters  of  a  century  among  a  few  inhabitants  of  the  southwest  part 
of  the  county.  No  reference  to  the  occurrence  of  coal  is  mentioned  in 
any  of  the  geologrical  reports,  except  that  T.  F.  Jackson,  in  discussing 
the  Pennsylvanian  of  th«  Bloomington  quadrangle,  says:  "Carbonaceous 
layers  varying  in  thickness  from  a  thin  streak  to  a  few  inches  in  thick- 
ness are  found  here  and  there  in  the  sandstone  shale  part  of  the  fo^ 
mation.  None  of  these  layers  appear  to  have  a  very  wide  horizontal 
distribution."  *  In  this  report  Jackson  does  not  definitely  locate  any  of 
these  occurrences  within  Monroe  County,  though  he  may  have  intended 
to  include  such  area.  About  twenty-five  years  ago  Mr.  Frank  Coleman, 
living  in  Indian  Creek  Township,  opened  a  coal  prospect  in  the  south- 
east quarter  of  Section  4.  He  first  opened  a  drift  and  took  out  several 
tons  of  coal,  which  he  sold  to  local  blacksmiths.  When  the  roof  of  the 
drift  caved  in  during  a  rainy  season,  he  went  back  about  thirty  feet 
from  the  mouth  of  the  entry  and  put  down  a  shaft,  entered  the  coal 
vein  and  took  out  twenty-six  bushels  of  coal  from  a  hole  about  four  feet 
square.  Before  he  could  get  the  shaft  lined  the  upper  part  of  it  caved 
in  and  he  abandoned  the  mining  project.  Coal  was  also  found  in  the 
bottom  of  a  well  in  the  southeast  quarter  of  Section  3  on  the  David 
Koontz  farm. 

In  the  late  fall  of  1917  Hall  and  Timberlake  of  Bloomington  leased 
the  Coleman  farm  and  began  prospecting  for  coal.  They  first  opened 
up  near  the  old  drift  and  exposed  a  layer  of  coal  about  fourteen  inches 
thick,  a  clay  parting  of  the  thickness  of  one  foot,  and  a  lower  layer  of 
coal  sixteen  inches  thick. 

As  the  entry  was  driven  back  under  the  hill  the  clay  diminished  in 
thickness  and  the  coal  Increased  in  thickness  to  that  extent.  They  also 
opened  up  the  old  shaft  and  found  a  thickness  of  twenty-six  inches  of 
good  hard  coal.  They  then  drilled  a  well  with  a  core  drill  midway 
between  the  occurrence  on  the  Coleman  place  and  the  one  on  the  Koontz 
place,  and  the  well  record  which  they  kept  shows  six  feet  of  coal  at 
this  point.     On  the  David  Koontz  place  they  then  sank  a  shaft  to  a 

'Sep  Thirty-ninth  Annual  Report,  GoiloRical  J^urvey  o^  Indiana,  1914,  P-  227. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Occurrence  of  Coal  in  Monroe  County.  173 

depth  of  seventeen  feet  and  struck  a  vein  of  coal  having  a  thickness  of 
about  two  feet.  In  an  entry  running  in  the  direction  of  the  well  above 
mentioned  the  coal  shows  evidence  of  thickening.  The  coal  at  this  point 
underlies  seventeen  feet  of  grayish  colored  sandstone.  Underlying  the 
coal  is  a  layer  of  fire  clay. 

The  deep  well  above  mentioned  was  drilled  at  an  elevation  of  about 
970  feet  above  sea  level.     The  strata  pierced  are  as  follows: 

Feet. 

Soil  (top) 6 

Ironstone  7 

White  shale 5 

Ironstone  6% 

Blue  sandstone 34 

Coal 6 

Blue  shale  containing  pyrite 22% 

Blue  sandstone 17 

Ironstone  and  ore 27% 

Limestone 3 

Total 133 

Composition  of  Monroe  County  Coal. 

A  sample  of  the  coal  taken  from  the  reopened  shaft  on  the  Coleman 
farm  was  analyzed  by  Mr.  H.  M.  Burlage  of  the  Chemical  Department 
of  Indiana  University.  The  sample  was  obtained  by  taking  a  bushel  of 
the  mine-run  coal,  crushing  and  quartering  down  to  about  one  pound  of 
crushed  coal,  which  was  turned  over  to  the  analyst.  The  results  ob- 
tained from  the  analysis  are  recorded  below: 

Analysis  of  Monroe  County  Coal. 

Per  cent. 

Volatile  matter 42.74 

Fixed  carbon 52.96 

Ash 4.3 

Sulphur  2.76 

B.  T.  U 14,599.70 

Comparing  this  analysis  with  the  analyses  of  115  samples  of  Indiana 
coals,  this  sample  showed  the  highest  amount  of  fixed  carbon ;  only  three 
samples  run  higher  in  volatile  matter;  only  six  are  lower  in  ash;  and 
it  is  the  highest  in  recorded  B.  T.  U. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


176        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

The  analysis  of  another  sample  taken  from  the  same  locality  was 
made  by  Thomas  J.  Dee  &  Co.,  Chicago,  111.  The  results  recorded  are 
as  follows: 

Per  cent. 

Hydro  carbon 44 .  90 

Fixed  carbon 43.20 

Ash 3.00 

Moisture 8.90 

Sulphur    1.56 

Coal  is  now  being  mined  by  Hall  and  Timberlake  from  the  shaft  on 
the  David  Koontz  place.  The  coal  is  being  used  locally  for  domestic 
purposes  and  for  blacksmithing. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Note  on  Occurrence  of  Indianaite  in  Monroe  County, 

Indiana. 


W.  N.  Logan,  Indiana  University. 


During  field  work  in  1917  the  writer's  attention  was  attracted  to  an 
outcrop  of  reddish  colored  clay  containing  fragments  of  a  white  clay 
near  the  public  road  in  Section  3  of  Indian  Creek  Township.  A  later 
examination  of  the  white  clay  showed  it  to  be  Indianaite,  a  variety  of 
halloysite. 

In  the  spring  of  1918,  Mr.  Dick  Hall  located  a  number  of  outcrops 
of  the  same  kind  of  clay  in  the  township.  One  of  these  outcrops  is  on 
the  public  road  near  the  John  Koontz  place  in  Section  10.  The  section 
exposed  consists  at  the  bottom  of  a  shale  containing  sandy  layers  near 
the  upper  part,  overlying  this  i§  a  layer  of  mahogany-colored  clay  of  a 
thickness  of  thirty  inches,  containing  fragments  of  Indianaite,  and  above 
is  a  five-foot  layer  of  sandstone.  The  Indianaite  occurs  under  and  in 
most  cases  immediately  in  contact  with  the  sandstone.  Where  the  sand- 
stone is  compact  and  unfissured  the  Indianaite  is  more  abundant.  The 
thickness  of  the  mahogany  clay  is  variable,  pinching  and  swelling.  In 
some  places  it  may  have  a  thickness  of  four  feet  and  pinch  down  to 
less  than  half  that  amount  in  less  than  ten  feet. 

At  one  point  in  Section  28  of  Van  Buren  Township,  in  a  sandstone 
layer,  there  is  a  thin  layer  made  up  of  the  fragments  of  Indianaite. 
This  occurrence  shows  that  the  Indianaite  had  been  formed,  eroded  and 
redeposited.  Below  the  sandstone  there  occurs  a  layer  of  mahogany 
clay  which  contains  small  fragments  of  Indianaite.  The  mahogany  clay 
rests  on  a  thin  bed  of  sandstone,  which  in  turn  rests  on  a  bed  of  greenish 
colored  shales.  In  the  shale  there  are  irregular,  lens-like  masses  of 
limestone.  Where  exposed  at  the  surface  these  limestone  masses  are 
surrounded  with  mahogany  clay  in  which  fragments  of  the  white  Indi- 
anaite were  found. 

Distribution, — In  Van  Buren  Township,  Indianaite  has  been  found  in 
Sections  27,  28,  83  and  34.  The  outcrops  occur  on  the  slopes  of  a  ridge 
which  rises  about  900  feet  above  sea  level  and  forms  a  part  of  the 
divide  between  Clear  Creek  on  the  east  and  Indian  Creek  on  the  south- 
west. On  the  road  which  connects  West  pike  with  the  Rockport  pike, 
passing  through  the  center  of  Section  28  and  intersecting  the  above- 
mentioned  ridge,  there  are  a  number  of  outcrops  of  Indianaite.  On  the 
northern  slope  of  the  ridge,  at  the  point  where  the  road  crosses  it,  there 

12—16668  (177) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


FiK.  1. 


Outcrop  of  mahogany  clay  with  white  kaolin  at  top.    Sandstone  above  and  shale  below. 
Coal  bloetiom  junt  below  note  book  and  below  mahogany. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


180        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

is  an  outcrop  of  mahogany  clay  which  contains  a  considerable  quantity 
of  Indianaite.  Underlying  the  clay  and  separating  it  from  a  bed  of 
shale  is  a  thin  layer  of  sandstone.  A  bed  of  sandstone  having  a  thick- 
ness of  twenty-five  feet  overlies  the  clay.  The  clay  has  a  thickness  of 
four  feet  at  the  outcrop,  but  pinches  down  to  about  half  that  in  a  dis- 
tance of  six  feet.  The  Indianaite  occurs  in  hard,  irreg^ular  fragments 
and  also  as  white  plastic  streaks  in  the  red-colored  clay.  On  the  same 
slope,  below  this  outcrop,  there  are  some  greenish  gray  shales  containing 
irregular  masses  df -litnestone  surrounded  by  mahogany  clay.  This  clay 
also  contains  some  fragments  of  the  white  Indianaite. 

On  the  same  ridge,  farther  east  on  the  north  side,  there  is  an  outcrop 
of  Indianaite  six  feet  thick  on  the  side  of  a  sinkhole.  On  the  south  side 
of  this  ridge,  in  the  southeast  quarter  of  Section  28,  Indianaite  occurs 
under  the  sandstone,  capping  the  top  of  the  ridge,  at  about  the  same 
elevatioi\  as  that  on  the  north  side.  West  of  the  road  above  mentioned, 
in  Section  33,  there  is  an  outcrop  of  mahogany  clay  containing  consider- 
able Indianaite.  The  clay  occurs  between  layers  of  sandstone  of  very 
fine  grain.  The  overlying  sandstone  has  a  thickness  of  about  thirty 
feet.  The  mahogany  layer  is  irregular  in  thickness,  pinching  and  swell- 
ing. Similar  outcrops  have  been  found  in  Section  27,  on  the  southwest 
side  of  the  ridge,  and  in  Section  34,  on  the  east  side. 

Indian  Creek  Township, — Indications  of  the  presence  of  Indianaite 
have  been  found  at  several  places  along  the  ridge  which  forms  the 
divide  between  Indian  Creek  and  Clear  Creek  in  this  township.  In 
Section  3  outcrops  occur  in  the  west  half  of  the  section.  In  Section  10 
outcrops  of  mahogany  clay  occur  at  several  points,  also  in  Sections  9 
and  17.  In  the  northwest  corner  of  Section  10,  near  the  public  road, 
there  is  an  outcrop  of  a  layer  of  mahogany  clay  having  a  thickness  of 
about  thirty  inches  in  places,  but  thinning  down  to  about  half  that  in 
other  places.  White  Indianaite  occurs  in  the  clay  in  small,  irregfular 
fragments,  which  are  most  abundant  under  the  compact  and  unfrac- 
tured  portions  of  the  roof  of  sandstone.  The  underlying  rock  is  shale, 
which  passes  into  very  sandy  shale  and  lenses  of  sandstone  just  below 
the  mahogany  clay.  The  geological  section  exposed  at  this  point  is 
as  follows: 

Feet. 

No.  8.  (Top.)    Shale 5 

No.  7.  Sandstone  in  thin  beds 5 

No.  6.  Shale,  sandy 6 

No.  5.  Sandstone  5 

No.  4.  Shale  20 

No.  3.  Sandstone,  thick  layers 10 

No.  2.  Mahogany  clay  and  Indianaite 2^ 

No.  1.  (Bottom.)    Shale,  sandy  toward  top 12 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


! 


Fig»  3.    Tunnel  of  Hall  and  Timbcrlake  kaolin  mine  in  Sectiai  27,  VanBuren  Tounship.    White 

maMses  in  front  are  fraKinenU  of  kaolin  taken  from  mine.  CjOOQIc 


182        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

This  mahogany  clay  lies  near  the  unconformity  in  the  Mississippian 
system  of  rocks.  The  shales  above  and  below  the  mahogany  belongs  to 
the  Mississippian. 

State  of  Development, — Small  pits  have  been  dug  at  several  places 
on  the  outcrop  of  the  mahogany  clay,  but  no  serious  attempt  at  develop- 
ment has  been  made.  In  order  to  determine  whether  the  Indianaite 
occurs  in  sufficient  quantities  to  warrant  commercial  development  will 
require  the  drilling  of  wells  along  the  sandstone  ridge  at  some  distance 
from  the  outcrop.  Near  the  outcrop  the  clay  is  nearly  always  stained 
with  oxides  of  iron. 

The  number  and  thickness  of  the  outcrops  offer  promise  of  workable 
beds  of  the  white  clay.  A  tunnel  has  been  driven  at  one  point  to  a 
distance  of  130  feet.  Six  feet  of  fairly  white  kaolin  was  found  in  this 
tunnel,  and  the  indications  are  that  a  marketable  quantity  exists. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Notes  on  the  Palaeontology  of  Certain  Chester 
Formations  in  Southern  Indiana. 


Allen  D.  Hole,  Earlham  College. 


In  the  course  of  an  examination  of  the  Chester  formations  of  southern 
Indiana  in  the  summer  of  1918,  especial  care  was  taken  at  a  few  points 
to  secure  a  representative  collection  of  the  fossils  present.  The  study 
of  the  collections  made  at  that  time  has  not  yet  been  completed,  but 
enough  has  been  done  to  make  clear  certain  interesting  relations  between 
the  formations  exposed  in  Indiana  and  those  which  have  been  examined 
in  southern  and  southwestern  Illinois,  and  for  this  reason  it  has  seemed 
worth  while  to  record  the  results  apparent  in  the  work  thus  far. 

The  localities  from  which  the  largest  number  of  species  were  col- 
lected are  all  in  Orange  County,  and  the  horizons  yielding  the  greatest 
abundance  of  well-preserved  specimens  were  of  limestone,  three  in 
number. 

Renault  Limestone. 

The  lowest  of  the  three  limestones  referred  to  yielded  the  following 
forms : 

Talarocrinus,  somewhat  abundant,  one  or  two  species. 

Pentremites,  somewhat  abundant,  including  some  very  small  forms. 

Cup  coral   (Zaphrentis?). 

Bryozoans  (Archimedes  rarely  present). 

Cliothyridina  sublamellosa  (Hall). 

Composita  sulcata,  Weller. 

Composita  trinuclea  (Hall). 

Diaphragmus  elegans  (Norwood  and  Pratten). 

Eumetria  vera  (Hall). 

Girtyella  (cf.)  indianensis  (Girty). 

Orthothetes  kaskaskiensis   (McChesney). 

Productus  ovatus,  Hall. 

Productus  parvus.  Meek  and  Worthen. 

Spirifer,  sp.  (near  breckenridgensis,  Weller). 

The  above  fauna,  considered  in  connection  with  the  relation  of  this 
limestone  to  the  other  formations  exposed,  seems  to  afford  sufficient  evi- 
dence to  justify  the  correlation  of  this  horizon  with  the  Renault  of 
Illinois  as  defined  by  Weller. 

(183) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


184        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Paint  Creek  Limestone. 

The  middle  one  of  the  three  limestones  examined,  found  in  some 
places  eighty  to  ninety  feet  higher  stratigraphically  than  the  lowest 
one,  yielding  the  forms  named  below,  and  is  consequently  correlated 
with  the  Paint  Creek  formation  of  Weller  in  Illinois.  The  uncertainty 
recorded  as  to  species  in  some  cases  is  to  be  understood  as  indicating 
more  or  less  difference  from  described  forms;  some  of  these  may  be 
new  species,  while  others  may  deserve  to  be  classed  merely  as  variations 
marking  less  than  specific  divergence.  The  fauna  as  made  out  so  far 
follows : 

Gastropods  sp?. 

Cup  corals  (Zaphrentis?). 

Crinoid  stems,  locally  abundant,  some  of  large  size. 

Pentremites  numerous,  larger  than  in  the  lowest  limestone. 

Archimedes,  not  numerous,  but  somewhat  more  abundant  than  in  the 
lowest  limestone. 

0 

Pygidia  of  trilobites.     Phillipsia?. 

Chonetes  chesterensis,  Weller. 

Cliothyridina  sublamellosa  (Hall). 

Composita  sulcata,  Weller. 

Diaphragmus  elegans  (Norwood  and  Pratten). 

Eumetria  verneuiliana  (Hall). 

Girtyella  (cf.)  indianensis  (Girty). 

Martinia  (cf.)  sulcata,  Weller. 

Orthothetes  kaskaskiensis  (McChesney). 

Productus  (cf.)  ovatus.  Hall. 

Pustula  sp?. 

Spirifer  sp?. 

Okaw  Limestone. 

The  upper  of  the  three  limestones  here  referred  to  is  found  in  some 
places  within  the  areas  examined  seventy  to  eighty  feet  higher  strati- 
graphically than  the  middle  limestone,  and  on  the  basis  of  the  fauna 
collected  and  the  relations  observed  is  correlated  with  the  lower  Okaw 
as  defined  by  Weller  from  studies  in  Illinois.  The  fauna  collected  shows 
the  following  forms: 

Gastropods  sp?,  a  few. 

Cup  corals  sp?,  many  partly  silicified  in  places. 

Bryozoans  including  abundant  Archimedes. 

Crinoids  numerous;  mostly  in  fragmental  state  including  wing  plates 
of  Pterotocrinus  sp?. 

Pentremites  abundant;  some  large  forms. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digitized  by 


I    Of      J 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Palaeontology  of  Certain  Chester  Formations.        185 

tes;  pygidia  of  Phillipsia?. 
ophoria  explanata  (McChesney). 
rridina  sublamellosa  (Hall). 
Bita  sulcata,  Weller. 
eita  trinuclea  (Hall), 
rtus  sp?. 
A  sp?. 
ir  sp?. 

iition  to  the  fauna  listed  and  correlated  above,  a  brief  examin- 
I  made  of  the  massive  limestone  beds  lying  below  the  formation 
Bd  as  Renault  limestone.  In  the  best  exposure  found  good 
I  of  fossils  were  not  abundant,  and  the  exact  location  of  the 
tester  bed  was  therefore  not  ascertained.  Stems  of  Platycrinus 
fte,  Wachsmuth  and  Springer,  were,  however,  found  at  forty-five 
feet  below  the  limestone  named  here  Renault,  thus  indicating 
mce  of  the  Ste.  Genevieve  as  defined  by  Weller,  and  fixing  the 
Hit  of  the  Chester  and  therefore  the  upper  limit  of  the  Ste. 
^  at  a  level  not  more  than  forty-five  or  fifty  feet  below  the 
tons  Renault  limestone  layer. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


186        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 
Soil  Survey  of  Cass  County,  Indiana. 


CoLONZO  C.  Beals,  Indiana  University. 


Description  of  the  Area, — Cass  County  lies  in  the  north  central  part 
of  Indiana.  It  is  bounded  on  the  north  by  Pulaski  and  Fulton,  on  the 
east  by  Miami,  on  the  south  by  Howard  and  Carroll,  and  on  the  west 
by  Carroll  and  White  counties.  The  greatest  length  north  and  south  is 
twenty-four  miles,  while  the  maximum  width  is  twenty-two  miles.  On 
the  west  boundary  line  it  follows  an  irregular  course.  Commencing-  with 
the  northwest  corner  of  the  county,  it  runs  twelve  miles  south,  three 
miles  east,  three  miles  south  and  eleven  miles  east  to  the  southeast 
comer  of  the  county.  Cass  County  has  a  total  area  of  420  square  miles 
and  is  divided  into  fourteen  civil  townships:  Boone,  Harrison,  Beth- 
lehem, Adams,  Miami,  Clay,  Eel,  Noble  and  Jefferson  on  the  north  side 
of  the  Wabash  River,  and  Clinton,  Washington,  Tipton,  Jackson  and 
Deer  Creek  on  the  south  side. 

The  county  is  roughly  divided  into  a  north  and  south  portion  by  the 
Wabash  River,  which  flows  in  a  general  east  and  west  direction  through 
the  county.  In  the  immediate  vicinity  of  the  Wabash  and  Eel  rivers 
the  country  is  undulating  and  broken.  After  leaving  the  rivers,  to  the 
south  the  surface  is  level.  All  the  southern  portion,  in  its  natural  state, 
was  heavily  timbered  with  hardwood,  bottom  and  table  land;  the  central 
portion  is  mostly  bottom  with  high  bluffs;  the  northern  part  is  largely 
prairie. 

The  drainage  of  the  county  depends  upon  the  large  valley  of  the 
Wabash  and  Eel  rivers,  which  extends  in  an  east  and  west  direction 
through  the  center  of  the  county;  the  highland  in  Tipton  and  Washing- 
ton townships  south  of  the  Wabash  River;  the  highland  in  Jackson  and 
Deer  Creek  townships,  and  the  highland  of  Harrison  and  Boone  town- 
ships. Deer  Creek  flows  west  near  the  central  part  of  Jackson  and 
Deer  Creek  townships,  emptying  in  the  Wabash  River  near  Delphi. 
Rock  Creek  rises  in  the  southwest  part  of  Tipton  Township,  and  flowing 
west  through  the  southern  part  of  Washington  Township,  empties  into 
the  Wabash  River  north  of  Rockfield  in  Carroll  County.  Pipe  Creek 
rises  in  the  southeast  portion  of  Miami  County  near  Xenia,  and  flowing 

<*  The  soil  survey  was  done  under  the  direction  of  Edward  Barrett,  State  Geolofdft. 
in  a  similar  way  to  the  surveys  of  the  past  eight  years.  Mr.  James  Mathes  assisted  in 
making  the  survey  which  was  done  in  the  field  season  of  1917.  Thanks  are  extended 
to  those  persons  who  assisted  in  makins:  the  survey  a  success. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Soil  Survey  of  Cass  County,  Indiana.  187 

in  a  south  of  northwest  direction,  enters  Cass  County  about  two  miles 
below  where  the  Wabash  River  enters,  keeping  the  general  direction 
until  it  is  south  of  Lewisburg,  when  it  turns  sharply  to  the  north,  empty- 
ing into  the  Wabash  River  just  below  that  town.  Pipe  Creek  derives 
its  name  from  the  fact  that  for  the  greater  part  of  its  course  in  Cass 
County,  the  channel  is  carved  in  the  limestone  which  comes  to  the  sur- 
face at  that  place.  Twelve  Mile  Creek  drains  the  southern  portion  of 
Adams  Township  and  a  part  of  Bethlehem  Township,  emptying  into 
Eel  River.  Indian  Creek  flows  northwest,  and  Little  Indian  Creek  drains 
west,  both  emptying  into  the  Tippecanoe  River.  Crooked  Creek  rises  in 
the  southwest  portion  of  Bethlehem  Township  and,  after  making  many 
turns  in  flowing  to  the  west,  bends  to  the  south  and  enters  the  Wabash 
River  near  Georgetown. 

Lake  Cicott  is  nine  miles  west  of  Logansport,  a  little  to  the  south- 
west of  the  center  of  Jefferson  Township.  It  is  one  mile  long  east  and 
west  and  has  an  average  width  of  one-fourth  of  a  mile  north  and  south, 
and  its  greatest  depth  is  sixty-four  feet.  Bluffs  twenty-five  feet  high 
surround  it  on  all  sides  except  the  east,  where  during  high  water  it 
drains  by  means  of  an  old  outlet  through  a  former  lake  bed  into  Crooked 
Creek. 

Abandoned  Valleys, — A  few  well-marked  abandoned  valleys  occur 
near  the  present  Wabash  Valley.  The  first  one  is  around  Waverly — 
in  fact  the  town  is  in  the  valley.  The  channel  enters  the  county  in 
Sections  22  and  27,  just  east  of  Waverly,  where  it  forms  a  valley  almost 
a  mile  wide,  narrowing  to  one-half  of  a  mile  near  the  Miami-Cass 
County  line.  Nearly  a  mile  west  of  Waverly  the  valley  turns  to  the 
south,  entering  the  present  Wabash  Valley  a  short  distance  west  of 
Lewisburg.  The  boundaries  of  the  channel  are  rather  uniform,  except 
for  a  few  gullies  that  enter  on  either  side.  Dr.  M.  N.  Elrod  and  Mr. 
A.  C.  Benedict,  in  discussing  the  geology  of  Cass  County  in  the  nine- 
teenth annual  report  of  the  Indiana  Department  of  Geology  and  Natural 
Resources  for  1894,  say: 

''This  stream  occupies  a  preglacial  channel  that  starts  west  from  the 
mouth  of  the  Mississinewa,  above  Peru,  and  runs  in  a  western  direction 
until  it  reaches  a  point  about  one  mile  west  of  Waverly,  where  it  turns 
south  and  intersects  the  Wabash  one-half  mile  west  of  Lewisburg.  At 
the  time  of  our  visit  a  diminutive  streamlet  was  trickling  over  the  rocks 
where  once  a  volume  of  water  poured." 

We  have  shown  that  stream  as  an  intermittent  stream  on  the  accom- 
panying map. 

Another  interesting  valley  occurs  west  of  Logansport  in  Clinton 
Township,  where  it  roughly  parallels  the  present  channel  of  the  Wabash 
River.    This  channel  leaves  the  county  one-fourth  mile  north  of  Clinton 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


188        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Township,  where  it  is  about  one-fourth  of  a  mile  wide.  In  places  it  has 
'  a  width  of  about  one-half  of  a  mile.  Near  the  east  end  as  it  approacht» 
the  river  a  large  area  of  muck  occurs.  This  channel  seems  to  enter  the 
Wabash  Valley  in  the  western  edge  of  Section  36.  Another  deep  valley 
enters  the  Wabash  Channel  in  the  eastern  half  of  Section  31,  heading 
toward  the  southeast.  It  starts  just  north  of  the  present  State  insane 
institution  at  Long  Cliff.  Near  the  western  end  this  valley  has  almost 
perpendicular  walls  and  a  width  of  over  one-fourth  mile.  The  southern 
escarpment  of  the  two  channels  in  Clinton  Township,  taken  as  a  whole, 
show  a  very  irregular  outline  with  numerous  gullies  and  V-shaped  val- 
leys, indicating  very  extensive  erosion,  while  on  the  opposite  side  no 
indication  of  stream  erosion  exists.  At  present  it  is  occupied  by  a  feu- 
small  streams,  but  no  large  ones. 

Early  History, — Until  1824  Cass  County  was  included  in  Tippecanoe 
County.  The  organization  of  the  county  was  completed  April  13,  1829, 
under  acts  of  the  State  legislature,  passed  December  18,  1828,  and 
January  19,  1829.  At  that  time  it  contained  all  that  portion  of  the 
State  now  included  in  the  counties  of  Miami,  Wabash,  Fulton,  Marshall, 
Kosciusko  and  St.  Jpseph  and  parts  of  Laporte,  Starke  and  Pulaski. 
The  county  seat  was  located  at  Logansport,  August  10,  1829. 

The  first  owners  of  the  soil  of  Cass  County  were  the  Pottawottomie 
and  Miami  Indians.  The  former  owned  the  land  north  of  the  Wabash, 
and  the  latter  that  upon  the  south.  The  first  cessions  of  lands  was 
made  by  the  Miamis  in  the  treaty  of  1818,  in  which  they  gave  up  the 
land  west  of  the  mouth  of  Eel  River.  The  Pottawottomies  surrendered 
the  land  north  of  the  Wabash  in  1876  at  the  Mississinewa  treaty  and  at 
subsequent  times  and  by  various  other  treaties. 

Logansport  was  named  in  honor  of  Captain  Logan,  a  Shawnee  chief, 
who  lost  his  life  in  November,  1812,  because  of  his  fidelity  to  the  whites, 
and  not  for  Logan  the  Mingo,  as  many  suppose.  The  original  plot  of 
the  town  contained  111  lots,  with  streets  66  feet  wide,  except  Broadway, 
which  is  82^  feet  wide. 

Roads. — December  31,  1918,  Cass  County  had  452%  miles  of  free 
gravel  roads  and  340  miles  of  unimproved  roads.  Rural  free  delivery 
extends  to  all  parts  of  the  county,  which  stimulates  the  extension  of 
good  roads. 

Population, — The  following  table  is  based  pn  the.  returns  of  the 
Federal  Census,  including  estimated  population  for  1920: 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Soil  Survey  of  Cass  County,  Indiana.  189 

1910.  1900.  1890.       Efltimated. 

Cass  County  36,368  34,535     31,152     38,200 

Adams  Township 984          974          962      

Bethlehem  Township   999      1,047       1,113      

Boone  Township,  including  Royal  Center  1,802      1,807      1,680      

Royal  Center,  town 909  657         527      1,010 

Clay  Township 745          765         838      

Clinton  Township   970       1,568       1,415      

Deer  Creek  Township 1,376       1,557       1,672      

Eel  Township,  including  Logansport 20,239     17,237     14,052      

Logansport  city 19,050  16,204     13,328     21,900 

Harrison  Township 1,231       1,258       1,189      

Jackson  Township,  including  Galveston.  1,748       1,725       1,655      

Galveston,  town,  incorporated  in  1904 . .  658      675 

Jefferson  Township 1,029       1,096       1,127      

Miami  Township 854          926          938      

Noble  Township 1,221       1,141          916      

Tipton  Township,  including  Walton 1,975       2,038       2,015      

Walton,  town 579  498         469         625 

Washington  Township   1,195       1,406       1,580      

Logansport,,  estimated  in  1917 20,754  

Hoover,  estimated  in  1910 100      

Lucerne,  estimated  in  1910 500      

Young  America,  estimated  in  1910 600      

Lincoln,  estimated  in  1910 250      

Waverly,  estimated  in  1910 90 

Onward,  estimated  in  1910 250      

Lake  Cicott,  estimated  in  1910 50      

Adamsboro,  estimated  in  1910 150      

Kennith,  estimated  in  1910 250      

Clymers,  estimated  in  1910 125      

The  above  table  shows  that  the  movement  of  population  has  been  to 
build  up  the  cities  and  larger  towns  at  the  expense  of  the  rural  dis- 
tricts. This  is  due  to  the  fact  that  the  younger  generation,  who  replen- 
ish the  working  class,  flock  to  the  factories  in  town.  The  present  (or 
just  past)  war  conditions  will  cause  the  "from  the  farm  to  the  city" 
exodus  to  continue. 

Agriculture, — Cass  County  had  2,656  farms  in  1900,  while  by  1910 
the  number  had  decreased  to  2,443.  In  1916  the  number  of  farms  con- 
taining over  five  acres  amounted  to  2,261,  containing  256,229  acres. 

The  number  of  farms,  classified  according  to  size,  were  as  follows 
in  1910: 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


190        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 

Under  3  acres 4 

3  to       9  acres 87 

10  to     19  acres 113 

20  to     49  acres 300 

50  to     99  acres 765 

100  to  174  acres 786 

175  to  259  acres 212 

260  to  499  acres 79 

500  to  999  acres 6 

1,000  acres  and  over 1 

In  1910,  the  average  farm  contained  102.3  acres;  93.8  per  cent  of  the 
total  land  area  was  in  farms,  and  82.7  per  cent  of  this  was  improved; 
35,392  acres  were  classed  as  wood  land.  In  1916  the  waste  land 
amounted  to  4,067  acres. 

Sixty-four  and  three-tenths  per  cent  of  all  farms  were  operated  by 
owners  in  1910,  which  was  a  decrease  of  1.4  per  cent  in  ten  years; 
twenty-three  farms  were  operated  by  managers,  a  decrease  of  four  in 
ten  years.  Eight  hundred  eighty-four  of  the  farms  operated  by  the 
owners  were  free  from  mortgage  debt,  while  669  had  mortgages. 

A  crop  that  is  on  the  increase  is  that  of  the  soy  bean — 797  acres 
were  devoted  to  it  alone  and  271  acres  in  combination  with  other  crops. 
It  can  be  used  in  the  silo,  thrashed  for  seed,  or  hogged  down  in  the 
fall.  Cow  peas  showed  an  acreage  of  seventy  acres  where  grown  alone 
and  thirty-three  acres  where  they  were  mixed  with  another  crop  or 
crops. 

The  crops  cut  for  ensilage  during  1917  amounted  to  4,591  acres, 
which,  we  will  suppose,  were  put  in  the  456  silos  found  in  the  county 
that  fall.  The  greater  percent  of  those  crops  consisted  of  com,  with 
some  using  part  soy  beans  or  cow  peas. 

The  county  had  934  acres  devoted  to  white  potatoes  in  1917. 

Most  of  the  small  fruit  and  truck  crops  occur  in  small  farm  gardens, 
but  one  acre  was  devoted  to  onions,  two  acres  to  tomatoes,  five  acres  to 
cabbages,  nine  acres  to  watermelons,  and  fifteen  acres  to  muskmelons 
(cantaloupes).  Strawberries,  blackberries  and  raspberries  occupied  sixty- 
four  acres,  while  we  find  43,849  bearing  apple  trees,  18,203  peach  trees, 
and  11,455  pear  trees. 

Cass  County  is  a  grain-producing  county,  with  a  great  deal  of  stock 
to  consume  the  grain  on  the  farm.  Fifty-eight  thousand  six  hundred 
three  acres  of  corn  were  harvested  in  1917,  which  did  not  give  a  normal 
yield  that  year  because  of  the  early  frost. 

During  1917  Cass  County  harvested  28,293  acres  of  wheat,  but  planted 
a  larger  acreage  that  year,  amounting  to  37,826  acres.     The  farmers 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Soil  Survey  of  Cass  County,  Indiana.  191 

planted  31,754  acres  in  oats,  or  a  little  more  than  the  amount  devoted 
to  wheat. 

A  great  deal  of  the  rye  planted  was  devoted  to  pasturage  or  plowed 
under  in  the  spring  as  a  green  manure.  Some  may  be  used  as  a  winter 
cover  crop  where  land  tends  to  erode.  The  crop  for  1917  amounted  to 
5,493  acres,  while  almost  double  that  area  was  sown  in  the  fall,  or 
9,032  acres. 

Some  barley  is  grown  in  this  region,  eighty-four  acres  in  1917,  and 
considerable  land  is  devoted  to  buckwheat,  for  the  seed  principally,  and 
secondarily  to  be  used  as  a  source  for  honey;  and,  last  but  not  least, 
buckwheat  is  used  as  a  restorer  of  fertility  and  friability  of  the  soil; 
fifty-four  acres  were  devoted  to  this  crop  alone. 

The  hay  produced  in  Cass  County  is  an  important  factor  in  the 
agricultural  economy,  the  largest  item  of  which  was  10,298  acres  of 
land  growing  timothy  hay  during  1917.  Some  of  it  is  sold  and  leaves 
the  county;  the  greater  part  of  it  is  fed  nearby  and  returned  to  the 
farms  in  the  form  of  manure.  Twenty  acres  of  land  were  devoted  to 
millet  and  Hungarian  grasses. 

A  crop  that  has  a  great  beneficial  effect  on  the  soil  and  should  have 
a  greater  acreage  is  clover,  of  which  8,787  acres  were  used  for  hay, 
while  3,317  acres  were  cut  and  thrashed  for  seed.  The  combined  acreage 
could  easily  be  one-fourth  of  the  combined  acreage  of  the  oats  and  wheat 
grown,  and  the  farming  interests  would  profit  by  the  change. 

In  1917  there  were  ten  pure-bred  horses  and  colts,  fifteen  milk  cows, 
and  200  hogs  in  Cass  County  (reported  to  the  township  assessor).  At 
that  time  there  were  10,604  horses,  1,686  mules,  8,066  milk  cows,  56,630 
hogs  and  5,923  sheep.  There  were  4,417  sheep  sheared,  yielding  an 
average  fleece  of  7.2  pounds. 

In  1917  Cass  County  had  only  173  colonies  of  bees,  which  yielded 
2,550  pounds  of  honey.  It  would  be  safe  to  say  that  more  than  that 
amount  of  honey  was  "wasted  on  the  desert  air"  in  the  county  because 
no  bees  were  present  to  save  it. 

The  farmers  of  Cass  County  bought  862  tons  of  fertilizers  in  1917 
and  used  a  great  deal  of  it  on  their  wheat  land. 

The  farmer^  had  forty-two  tractors  on  their  farms  the  same  year 
to  aid  in  increasing  the  amount  of  their  farm  crops.  They  also  had 
1,491  cream  separators  in  use  on  their  farms. 

Climatology. — In  a  general  way  Cass  County  has  the  same  kind  of 
climate  that  north  central  Indiana  ^experiences.  The  following  data  is 
based  on  a  record  of  twenty-eight  years  in  the  city  of  Logansport  about 
two  squares  north  of  Eel  River  at  an  elevation  of  620  feet.  (The  coun- 
try is  slightly  rolling.)  The  average  date  of  the  last  killing  frost  in 
the  spring  is  April  27th,  and  the  last  killing  frost  in  the  fall  is  October 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


192        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

13th.  The  latest  killing  frost  in  the  spring  occurred  May  16th,  and  the 
earliest  killing  frost  in  the  fall  was  September  21st.  The  average  grow- 
ing season  is  169  days,  ranging  from  144  days  in  1895  and  1904  to  210 
in  1902. 

The  prevailing  direction  of  the  wind  is  from  the  west  throughout 
the  year. 

The  only  available  data  on  average  hourly  wind  movement  (miles), 
mean  relative  humidity  (percentage),  and  sunshine  (percentage)  is 
from  Fort  Wayne  from  a  five-year  record.      (See  table  below.) 

The  precipitation  of  Cass  County  is  adequate  for  all  cix)p  require- 
ments of  that  region,  and  it  is  uniformly  distributed  over  the  growing 
season.  The  greatest  amount  of  the  year  faUs  during  the  summer 
months.  Dry  and  wet  spells  are  not  unknown,  but  they  do  not  nor- 
mally destroy  the  crops.  The  dry  spells  usually  occur  during  the  middle 
or  late  summer,  while  the  wet  season  normally  comes  in  the  winter  or 
spring,  as  the  spring  high  water. 


M 

g 

g 

i 

B 

H 

, 

H 

g 

s 

"5 

"0       1 

Months. 

1 

J 

3 

•s. 

1 

go 

1 

1 

s 

s 
a 

ii 

1 

ii 

1 

1 

g 
1 

1 

> 

1 

1 

s     1 

?  1 

1  1 

i 

1 

Oh 

< 

S 

>> 

s 

X 

■s 

rt 

X 

X 

January  

6.1 

2.32 

9.6 

25.4 

34.6 

18.2 

69 

26 

9.6 

82 

82  , 

30 

February 

6.7 

4.7 

0.4 

trace 

0 

2.64 
2.91 
3.31 
4.31 
3.73 

li 

10.6 
11.5 
9.3 

26  4 
37.6 
51.1 
62.3 
71.5 

35.1 

47.8 
61.4 
74.1 
83.7 

17.1 
28.6 
40.3 
50.2 
58.7 

69 
87 
91 
101 
103 

24 
3 
15 
28 
37 

U  3 
10.8 
11.1 
9.3 

8.1 

81 
80 

78 
78 
76 

77  1 
74 
70  1 

62  , 

44 

March 

52 

April 

56 

May 

59 

June 

70 

July 

0 

3.25 

8.3 

75.5 

87.7 

62.4 

106 

43 

7.2 

78 

64  1 

67 

August 

0 

3.11 

6.9 

72.5 

85.4 

60.2 

103 

41 

7.5 

85 

68 

61 

September 

0 

3.22 

7.2 

66.3 

78.9 

53.6 

102 

30 

7.7 

85 

73 

62 

October 

trace 

2.56 

7.2 

53  9 

65.7 

41.5 

91 

18 

8.4 

87 

72  ■ 

51 

November 

1.0 

3.15 

8,4 

40.5 

49.6 

30.9 

80 

3 

11.8 

81 

73  1 

42 

December 

42 

2.54 

8.2 

29.6 

37.4 

22.7 

70 

15 

10.5 

83 

80  1 

30 

Season 

23.1 

37  5 

10.4 

51.0 

61.8 

40.4 

106 

25 

9.6 

82 

72 

1 

52 

Soils. 

Definition, — Soils  consist  of  the  broken  and  decomposed  portions  of 
rocks  mixed  with  more  or  less  organic  matter  in  various  stages  of  de- 
composition. To  the  agriculturist  it  is  that  portion  of  the  earth's  sur- 
face into  which  the  roots  of  plants  may  penetrate  and  obtain  nourish- 
ment. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Soil  Survey  of  Cdss  County,  Indiana.  193 

Physical  Properties, — In  former  years  it  was  thought  that  the  chem- 
ical analysis  of  a  soil  was  of  the  most  importance;  but  since  the  subject 
has  been  better  understood,  the  physical  side  has  gained  in  emphasis. 
A  factor  of  prime  importance  to  the  agriculturist  is  the  absorbing  ca- 
pacity of  a  soil  and  its  ability  to  retain  and  furnish  moisture  to  the 
growing  plant  as  needed.  In  fact  the  ability  of  a  soil  to  furnish  an 
adequate  amount  of  water  to  the  grrowing  crop  is  of  far  more  importance 
than  its  chemical  ingrredients.  Pure  sand  holds  water  poorly,  so  that 
sand  is  ordinarily  a  dry  soil.  At  the  other  extreme,  clay  holds  moisture 
very  tenaciously,  so  that  a  pure  clay  soil  is  soggry  and  apt  to  be  very 
wet.  A  mixture  of  the  two,  forming  a  loam,  is  not  subject  to  either 
objections  and  is  an  ideal  soil. 

Liberation  of  Plant  Food, — Ground  limestone  and  decaying  organic 
matter  are  the  principal  materials  which  the  farmer  can  utilize  most 
profitably  to  bring  about  the  liberation  of  plant  food.  The  ground  lime- 
stone corrects  the  acidity  of  the  soil  and  thus  encourages  not  only  the 
nitrogen-gathering  bacteria  which  live  in  the  nodules  found  on  the 
growing  roots  of  the  growing  plants  of  clovers,  cow  peas,  alfalfa  and 
other  leguminous  plants,  but  also  the  nitrifying  bacteria  in  the  soil, 
which  have  the  power  to  make  into  plant  food  the  insoluble  and  un- 
available organic  products.  At  the  same  time  the  products  of  this 
decomposition  also  make  available  the  insoluble  minerals  found  in  the 
soil,  such  as  the  potassium  and  magnesium,  as  well  as  the  insoluble  lime- 
stones and  phosphates,  which  can  be  applied  by  the  agriculturist  in  a 
very  low-priced  form. 

One  of  the  chief  sources  of  loss  of  organic  matter  in  the  com  belt 
is  the  burning  of  the  corn  stalks.  If  the  farmers  would  only  realize 
the  loss  they  incur  they  certainly  would  discontinue  the  practice.  Prob- 
ably no  form  of  organic  matter  acts  to  form  good  tilth  better  than  the 
plowing  under  of  com  stalks.  It  is  true  they  decay  slowly,  but  that 
only  prolongs  the  desired  conditions  of  the  soil.  The  nitrogen  in  a  ton 
of  stalks  is  one  and  a  half  times  that  of  a  ton  of  manure,  while  a  ton 
of  dry  stalks  when  ultimately  incorporated  with  the  soil  is  equal  to  four 
times  that  amount  of  average  farm  manure,  but  when  they  are  burned 
the  humus-making  element  and  nitrogen  are  both  gone  and  lost  to 
the  soil. 

Upland  Soils, — The  upland  soils  of  Cass  County  are  mapped  in  three 
series,  namely:  Clyde,  Miami  and  Dunkirk  types,  and,  in  addition,  the 
miscellaneous  type  known  as  Muck.  These  types  are  all  due  to  a  dif- 
ference in  soil  content  and  color  and  to  surface  conditions  resulting  from 
erosion.  The  Miami  and  Clyde  series  occur  side  by  side,  perhaps  coming 
from  a  similar  glacial  till,  but  those  areas  having  a  better  natural 
drainage  and  smaller  amount  of  organic  remains  for  humus  become  the 


13—16568 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


194        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

light-colored  clay  land  or  the  Miami  series,  while  the  depressed  areas 
with  poor  drainage,  or  no  drainage,  in  swamp  or  marsh  conditions, 
become  the  black  or  brown  areas  known  as  the  Clyde  series;  or,  where 
there  was  a  great  abundance  of  partly  decomposed  organic  matter,  they 
become  Muck.  The  Dunkirk  comprises  the  sand  ridges  and  the  loamy 
sand  of  a  light  yellowish  brown  color. 

Alluvial  Soils, — The  alluvial  soils  of  Cass  County  are  the  sediments 
deposited  in  the  stream  valleys  by  flood  waters.  A  loam  in  the  humid 
region  always  has  a  very  luxuriant  growth  of  vegetation  where  it  has 
an  adequate  supply  of  water. 

One  of  the  effects  of  the  presence  of  humus  is  to  produce  granules, 
forming  a  mellow,  easily  worked  soil.  Where  a  soil  is  cultivated  without 
adding  to  the  supply  of  humus,  the  soil  becomes  more  compact  and  runs 
together,  producing  decreasing  crops  and  reducing  the  moisture- 
retaining  capacity.  Cultivation  loosens  the  soil,  promoting  aeration, 
and  increases  the  amount  of  available  plant  food. 

Chemical  Properties, — A  chemical  analysis  of  a  soil  will  show  the 
amounts  of  the  different  plant  foods,  such  as  nitrogen,  phosphorus, 
potassium,  calcium,  etc.;  but  the  difficulty  is  that  it  does  not  even  give 
a  hint  as  to  the  form  in  which  the  elements  occur  in  the  soil.  The 
analysis  shows  correctly  the  total  organic  carbon,  but  as  a  rule  this 
represents  about  one-half  the  organic  matter,  so  that  20,000  pounds  of 
organic  carbon  in  the  upper  six  inches  of  an  acre  represent  but  twenty 
tons  of  organic  matter.  But  this  twenty  tons  is  largely  in  the  form  of 
old  organic  residues  that  have  accumulated  during  the  centuries  because 
they  were  so  resistant  to  decay;  so  two  tons  of  clover  plowed  under  as 
a  green  manure  would  have  greater  power  to  liberate  plant  food  for  a 
growing  crop  than  all  the  twenty  tons  of  old  residue  of  organic  remains. 

The  sediments  came  from  the  uplands  adjacent  to  the  valleys  of  the 
different  streams,  and  a  certain  kind  of  upland  gave  rise  to  a  different 
type  of  alluvial  soil.  The  overflow  land  is  placed  in  the  Genesee  series.^ 
The  Fox  series  consists  of  terrace  soils,  deposited  perhaps  by  the  glacial 
waters,  which  were  a  great  deal  more  abundant  than  the  waters  of  the 
present  time.  The  meadow  land  has  not  been  mapped,  but  much  of  the 
land  along  the  smaller  streams,  classed  as  Genesee,  belongs  to  this  type. 

Miami  Silt  Loam. 

Characteristics, — The  Miami  silt  loam  consists  of  a  dark  gray  or  a 
light  brown  friable  silt  loam  having  an  average  depth  of  ten  inches. 
It  is  usually  deeper  in  depressed  or  level  areas  and  somewhat  shallower 
on  the  crest  of  ridges  and  on  steep  slopes.  When  moist  the  surface 
becomes  almost  uniformly  grayish  or  yellowish  brown,  but  when  dry  it 
becomes  a  li^ht  ashy  gray. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Soil  Survey  of  Cass  County,  Indiana.  195 

The  immediate  subsoil  consists  of  a  yellow  or  yellowish  brown  silty 
clay  loam  having  a  depth  of  from  twenty  to  thirty  inches.  This  is 
immediately  underlain  by  a  yellowish  clay  or  yellowish  gritty  or  sandy 
loam  with  usually  more  or  less  amount  of  coarse  sand,  ^  gravel  and 
boulders.  As  a  rule  the  material  consists  chiefly  of  fragments  of  lime- 
stone, a  mixture  of  crystallines  of  various  kinds. 

The  silt  loam  has  a  more  brownish  color  near  the  streams,  where 
the  ground  is  more  or  less  broken,  and  on  the  well-drained  ridges.  This 
is  due  to  greater  oxidation  because  of  better  drainage.  The  white  clay 
knolls  will  take  on  a  darker  color  when  better  drained  and  aerated. 

The  different  soil  areas  mapped  as  the  Miami  silt  loam  will  vary 
from  the  above  description  in  one  or  more  particulars,  but  will  agree  in 
the  main.  The  Miami  silt  loam  has  a  level  to  undulating  or  rolling 
surface  and  occurs  throughout  the  country,  with  the  Clyde  series  occur- 
ing  in  the  depressions. 

Origin. — The  Miami  silt  loam,  in  common  with  other  members  of 
the  Miami  series,  is  due  to  the  glaciation  of  the  region  in  which  it 
occurs.  The  retreating  ice  left  the  till  with  a  very  uneven  surface, 
composed  of  numerous  ridges  and  valleys  or  depressions.  During  the 
process  of  erosion  and  weathering  since  that  time,  the  ridges  have  tended 
to  become  lower,  thus  filling  the  depressions  with  the  organic  remains 
and  the  finer  sediments  from  the  higher  lands.  The  better  natural 
drainage  and  lack  of  a  large  amount  of  humus  would  produce  a  light- 
colored  soil  with  a  high  clay  and  silt  content.  This  condition  is  well 
shown  along  the  larger  watercourses,  where  the  surplus  water  rapidly 
drains  away,  producing  a  wide  strip  of  the  Miami  series  on  either  side 
without  any  or  with  very  few  areas  of  the  Clyde  series  even  in  the 
largest  depressions. 

Drainage. — The  fine  texture  and  uniform  structure  causes  ground 
water  to  move  slowly  and  makes  natural  drainage  inadequate  in  the 
Miami  silt  loam.  This  condition  can  be  remedied  by  the  use  of  tile 
drainage,  but  care  should  be  taken  by  not  using  too  small  tile  as  lateral 
lines.  The  drains  not  only  remove  the  surplus  water  in  wet  weather, 
thus  lowering  the  ground  water  table,  but  also  help  to  aerate  the  soil 
in  dry  weather.  In  most  cultivated  soils  the  pore  space  is  from  25% 
to  50%  of  the  volume,  and  this  is  the  maximum  water  capacity  or  satu- 
ration capacity.  The  amount  of  this  space  occupied  by  water  for  the 
maximum  development  of  most  plants  is  from  40%  to  50%  of  the  pore 
space,  which  leaves  one-half  or  more  to  be  occupied  by  air.  The  pres- 
ence of  a  large  amount  of  oxygen  in  the  soil  is  essential  to  the  best 
growth  of  the  plant  crops  as  well  as  the  liberation  of  the  necessary 
plant  food. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


196        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Tilth. — It  is  well  to  have  in  mind  that,  aside  from  fertility,  drainage 
and  tillage,  one  of  the  main  factors  of  a  good  soil  is  good  physical  con- 
dition, or  tilth.  The  Miami  silt  loam  is  in  good  tilth,  but  since  it  has 
a  small  percent  of  sand  is  very  fine  grained  and  easily  injured  by  the 
tramping  of  live  stock  in  the  spring  and  fall  on  the  stalk  or  stubble 
grround  and  by  plowing  or  working  the  ground  when  too  wet.  Clods 
will  result  from  these  practices,  and  it  usually  requires  considerable 
time  and  work  to  put  the  soil  in  good  tilth  again.  An  occasional  appli- 
cation of  ground  limestone,  followed  with  a  crop  of  clover  or  some 
soiling  crop,  will  produce  good  tilth.  In  fact  good  physical  conditions 
depend  to  a  large  extent  upon  the  amount  of  humus  present  in  the  soil. 

Crops. — Corn,  wheat,  oats,  clover  and  timothy  do  well  on  the  Miami 
silt  loam.  It  is  not  as  good  corn  land  as  the  Clyde,  but  it  produces 
good  crops  where  the  soil  is  well  cared  for.  To  do  the  best  a  field 
should  not  be  in  corn  two  years  in  succession.  Wheat  and  oats  do  well ; 
in  fact  the  Miami  silt  loam  is  better  for  wheat  and  oats  than  any 
member  of  the  Clyde  series,  as  it  is  apt  to  grow  too  rank  and  fall  down 
when  grown  on  the  latter  soils.  Clover  and  timothy  do  well,  but  it  is 
better  not  to  grow  the  timothy  alone,  as  it  has  a  strong  tendency  to 
deplete  the  fertility  of  the  soil.  Some  potatoes  are  grown  on  the  Miami 
silt  loam,  but  it  does  not  give  a  high  yield.  Some  orchards  are  grown 
on  this  type  and  seem  to  give  good  results. 

Improvement. — As  has  been  stated  before,  the  Miami  silt  loam  should 
be  kept  in  good  tilth  by  proper  drainage,  cultivation  and  the  growing 
of  crops  for  soiling  purposes.  All  the  manure  produced  on  a  farm 
should  be  carefully  taken  care  of  and  spread  over  the  land  where  it  is 
most  needed.  It  is  well  to  follow  a  rotation  where  the  com  is  planted 
on  clover  sod.  The  number  of  crops  and  kinds  used  in  rotation  will 
depend  on  the  size  of  the  farm  and  the  type  of  farming  practiced,  but 
should  include  one  (two  would  be  better)  year  of  clover.  Where  the 
ground  seems  to  be  "clover  sick"  only  an  application  of  ground  lime- 
stone is  needed  to  insure  a  change.  Commercial  fertilizers  may  be 
resorted  to  under  some  conditions,  but  we  believe  that  they  should  not 
be  constantly  used  with  all  crops. 

Ml\mi  Loam. 

Properties. — The  Miami  loam  is  a  transition  between  the  silt  loam 
and  the  sandy  loam,  and  the  boundary  between  them  is  usually  arbi- 
trary. It  has  a  higher  percent  of  sand  and  has  perhaps  a  little  darker 
color  than  the  silt  loam. 

The  subsoil  of  the  Miami  loam  has  a  higher  percent  of  sand  and 
fine  gravel  than  the  silt  loam  and  is  variable  in  color  and  texture.     On 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Soil  Sjirvey  of  Cass  Co^inty,  Indiana.  197 

the  one  hand  it  grades  into  the  silt  to  loam  type,  while  on  the  other  it 
may  he  sandy,  grading  into  the  sandy  loam. 

The  difference  in  the  character  of  the  till  as  left  by  the  glacier  and 
the  removal  of  the  silt  by  the  weathering  and  eroding  agents  are  prob- 
ably responsible  for  the  present  structure  of  the  Miami  loam.  The 
topography  is  similar  to  that  of  the  Miami  silt  loam. 

Drainage. — The  drainage  of  the  Miami  loam  is  usually  good  on 
account  of  the  open,  porous  structure  of  the  soil  and  the  large  amount 
of  sand  and  gravel  in  the  subsoil.  In  some  cases,  however,  the  subsoil 
is  hard  and  compact,  producing  a  poor  natural  drainage.  In  such  cases 
artificial  drainage  would  be  beneficial  and  greatly  increase  the  pro- 
ducing capacity  of  the  soil. 

Crops  Grown. — The  crops  grown  on  this  type  are  similar  to  those  of 
the  Miami  silt  loam  and  they  yield  as  good  crops.  Owing  to  the  pres- 
ence of  sand  it  can  be  more  readily  kept  in  a  state  of  good  tilth,  but  it 
quickly  responds  to  good  farming  methods.  The  same*  farming  methods 
will  apply  equally  well  in  the  Miami  loam  as  in  the  silt  loam  types. 

Location. — The  Miami  loam  is  about  as  extensive  as  the  silt  loam 
and  is  largely  south  of  the  Wabash  and  Eel  rivers.  It  is  valued  about 
the  same  as  the  silt  loam  types. 

Miami  Sandy  Loam. 

Characteristics. — The  upper  six  inches  consist  of  a  grayish  to  dark 
brown  fine  sandy  loam  or  fine  loamy  sand.  The  subsoil  is  a  yellowish 
brown  heavy  loam  grrading  at  about  eighteen  inches  into  a  sticky  fine 
sandy  loam  or  clay  loam.  In  some  places  it  changes  to  a  yellowish  sand 
mixed  with  some  clay. 

Location. — It  occurs  in  Cass  County  north  of  the  Wabash  River, 
becoming  less  sandy  towards  the  river.  A  great  deal  of  gravel  occurs 
around  Adamsboro  and  Georgetown.  The  sandy  phase  is  associated 
with  the  sand  ridges  where  the  sand  has  been  blown  over  the  nearby 
land.  The  ridges  are  usually  more  sandy  or  gravelly,  while  the  valleys 
contain  a  greater  percent  of  clay.  The  topography  ranges  from  level 
to  undulating  or  rolling.  Part  has  a  morainic  surface  with  more  or 
less  boulders. 

Drainage. — The  drainage  of  the  Miami  sandy  loam  is  more  abundant 
and  is  apt  to  be  somewhat  droughty  in  more  sandy  areas.  The  depres- 
sions usually  develop  swamps  which  have  little  or  no  drainage.  A  num- 
ber of  open  ditches  have  been  made,  heading  in  the  Muck  and  Clyde 
areas.  Numerous  wet  quicksand  areas  occur  on  the  hillside,  where  the 
water-bearing  sands  and  gravel  are  exposed.  These  places  are  difficult 
to  drain  because  of  the  continuous  water  supply. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


198        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Crops  Grown, — This  type  produces  good  yields  of  com,  oats,  wheat, 
clover  and  potatoes.  Apples,  pears,  peaches,  grapes  and  small  fruits 
should  do  well  on  this  type  of  soil.  A  few  orchards  have  been  planted 
and  seem  to  do  well. 

Where  sand  ridges  occur  in  the  sandy  loam,  care  should  be  taken 
to  keep  the  sand  from  blowing  in  the  spring  of  the  year.  The  sand  not 
only  uncovers  the  young  crops  on  the  ridges  but  it  covers  up  the  plajits 
in  drifting.  Blowing  sand  does  great  damage  by  lacerating  the  leaves. 
The  more  sandy  ridges  should  have  cover  crops  during  the  spring  of 
the  year,  such  as  rye. 

The  fine  sandy  loam  is  easily  cultivated  and  requires  less  labor  to 
secure  a  good  seedbed  than  the  other  upland  soils.  The  yields  are 
slightly  below  those  of  the  heavier  types. 

Care  should  be  taken  not  to  cultivate  sandy  land  when  too  wet  The 
water  soon  sinks  down  and  the  surface  soon  dries  off,  but  below  the  first 
inch  the  soil  is  to©  wet.  If  stirred  too  wet,  the  soil  loses  too  much  water 
by  evaporation. 

The  application  of  barnyard  and  green  manures  is  very  important. 
Clover  and  other  leguminous  crops  should  be  grrown  for  green  manure. 
It  is  well  to  remember  that  sandy  land  loses  fertility  easier  than  clay 
soil  from  leaching. 

Clyde  Silty  Clay  Loam. 

Characteristics, — The  surface  of  the  Clyde  silty  clay  loam  is  a  silty 
loam  to  a  depth  of  from  ten  to  sixteen  inches.  It  then  grades  into  a 
sandier  brown  clay  loam  having  an  average  depth  of  sixteen  inches. 
The  subsoil  consists  of  a  drab  or  a  dark  blue,  mottled  with  a  yellowish 
to  a  rusty  brown  plastic  clay  loam.  When  wet  its  surface  is  dark  brown 
or  black,  but  when  dry  its  surface  becomes  a  grayish  brown  to  brown. 
When  dry  the  soil  crumbles,  forming  cubical  blocks.  The  surface  forms 
deep  cracks. 

The  Clyde  silty  clay  loam  grades  on  one  side  into  the  Peat  and  Muck 
series,  while  on  the  other  side  it  merges  into  the  surrounding  Miami 
soils. 

The  topography  is  naturally  level,  with  perhaps  an  occasional  slight 
elevation  on  the  surface. 

Origin, — The  Clyde  silty  clay  loam,  in  common  with  the  Clyde  series, 
is  due  to  depressions  in  the  surface  after  the  retreat  of  the  glacier. 
The  depressions  had  a  very  poor  natural  drainage  and  became  marshes 
and  swamps  in  the  case  of  the  glaciated  regions.  The  areas  are  con- 
nected in  most  cases  by  long,  narrow,  usually  parallel  lines,  where  the 
water  slowly  drained  from  the  higher  swamps  to  the  lower  ones  and 
finally  reached  the  smaller  tributaries  of  the  streams.     The  swamps 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Soil  Survey  of  Cass  County,  Indiana.  199 

slowly  filled  with  organic  remains  from  the  surrounding  higher  land  in 
addition  to  the  rank  vegetation  that  flourished  in  the  swamps  them- 
selves. The  organic  matter  settled  to  the  bottom,  where  it  decayed  and 
became  mixed  with  the  fine  clay  sediments  that  were  washed  into  the 
depressions.  The  poor  drainage  produced  the  heavy  phase,  while  the 
better  and  more  free  drainage  gave  rise  to  the  silt  loam  with  a  bright 
yellow  to  reddish  subsoil  at  a  depth  of  two  feet. 

Drainage. — The  Clyde  series  of  soil  types  requires  artificial  drainage 
to  lower  the  water  level  below  the  surface  of  the  soil.  In  fact,  when 
the  country  was  hrst  settled,  the  black  land  was  all  under  water,  but 
after  thorough  drainage  it  was  considered  the  best  soil  type. 

The  Clyde  silt  clay  loam  contains  a  very  high  percent  of  humus, 
which,  united  with  the  clay,  forms  a  porous,  friable  soil  which  absorbs 
moisture  readily  and  is  easily  cultivated. 

Crops  Grown. — The  Clyde  soil  is  the  leading  corn  land  of  the  country. 
It  yields  fifty  to  seventy-five  and  sometimes  eighty  to  ninety  bushels  per 
acre.  Timothy  is  a  good  crop  to  grow  on  the  more  chaffy  phases,  where 
other  crops  have  a  tendency  to  dry  up.  Oats  yields  well  and  wheat  does 
good,  but  both  crops  tend  to  produce  too  rank  a  growth  of  straw  and 
consequently  to  lodge.  Wet,  open  winters  are  bad  for  wheat.  The 
open,  loose  texture  admits  water  freely,  and  freezing  heaves  the  soil, 
pulling  the  wheat  out  of  the  ground.  A  relatively  dry  winter  season, 
with  a  few  inches  of  snow  for  protection,  is  followed  by  good  results. 

The  Clyde  silty  clay  loam,  or  silty  loam  as  it  is  sometimes  called, 
occurs  typically  south  of  the  Wabash  River.  The  Muck  is  always  asso- 
ciated with  or  surrounded  by  this  soil  type. 

Clyde  Loam. 

Properties. — The  Clyde  loam  is  a  grayish  brown  to  a  brownish  black 
soil  with  an  average  depth  of  about  ten  inches.  The  subsoil  is  a  grayish 
brown  in  color,  increasing  in  clay  content  as  it  descends,  and  at  about 
eighteen  inches  to  two  feet  grading  into  a  mottled  bright  yellow  material. 
It  is  sometimes  streaked  with  a  reddish  color  and  with  the  steel  gray. 
This  type  occurs  in  shallower  depressions,  and  the  color  of  the  surface 
soil  is  sometimes  almost  midway  between  the  surrounding  Miami  soil 
and  the  darker  Clyde  silty  clay  loam. 

Crops  Grown. — The  Clyde  loam  is  well  adapted  to  the  growing  of 
corn,  clover,  wheat,  oats  and  timothy.  It  is  first  and  last  a  corn  soil; 
in  fact,  in  some  parts  of  the  county  that  crop  seems  to  be  the  only 
one  grown. 

A  crop  rotation  should  be  practiced,  including  a  crop  of  clover  or 
some  leguminous  crop,  every  four  or  five  years  to  enrich  the  soil.     The 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


200        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

farmers  are  planting  the  soy  bean  in  the  corn  rows  and  also  as  separate 
crops.     This  will  help  to  improve  the  soil. 

Location, — The  Clyde  loam  is  developed  throughout  the  county,  but 
principally  south  of  the  Wabash. 

Clyde  Sandy  Loam. 

Properties. — The  Clyde  sandy  loam  consists  of  a  variable  black  to  a 
brownish  black  loam  about  sixteen  inches  deep.  The.  subsoil  is  a  light 
drab  or  sticky  fine  sandy  or  loam  mottled  with  brown  or  drab  and 
grading  at  about  thirty  inches  into  a  gravelly  yellowish  clay. 

Below  this  and  along  the  border  of  the  lake  plain  the  subsoil  and 
the  substratum  is  often  of  heavier  glacier  till.  In  places  the  top  soil 
is  Muck  but  has  the  typical  Clyde  subsoil.  In  other  cases  the  subsoil 
grades  into  a  fine  water-bearing  sand. 

Location, — This  type  occurs  in  the  lake  plain  region  and  to  the  east 
north  of  the  Wabash,  where  it  occupies  the  low  depressed  areas  between 
the  more  sandy  ridges.  It  is  intermingled  with  higher,  island-like  areas, 
usually  of  Miami  sandy  loam. 

The  surface  is  level  or  very  slightly  undulating.  The  Clyde  sandy 
loam  is  due  to  an  accumulation  of  an  abundant  growth  of  marsh  grass 
mixed  in  with  the  sand  and  clay  and  washed  in  from  the  higher  bor- 
dering ridges. 

Formerly  it  was  covered  with  water  and  marsh  grass,  but  at  present 
a  system  of  dredge  ditches  and  lateral  drain  tile  form  fairly  adequate 
drainage.  Care  must  be  taken  in  the  spring  of  the  year,  as  numerous 
marshy  or  boggy  places  occur,  due  to  the  excess  of  water  and  probably 
the  presence  of  quicksand  near  the  surface.  This  is  a  great  hindrance 
to  farming  operations.  Perhaps  one  of  the  greatest  factors  is  a  lack 
of  sufficient  drainage,  but  this  will  be  remedied  in  time. 

The  Clyde  sandy  loam  is  the  most  extensive  and  most  important  soil 
type  of  the  lake  region,  in  fact  of  northwestern  Cass  County.  Between 
80%  and  90%  of  this  is  in  cultivation. 

Crops  Grown, — Com  and  oats  are  the  principal  grain  crops  grown, 
yielding  as  much  as  eighty  bushels  per  acre.    Some  wheat  is  also  grown- 

Before  the  Clyde  sandy  loam  was  drained  most  of  it  was  used  for 
marsh  hay  and  pasture. 

Perhaps  potash  is  the  best  fertilizer  to  use,  as  experiments  have 
shown  an  increase  of  from  ten  to  twenty  bushels  per  acre  of  com  from 
its  use. 

This  type  is  used  for  trading  purposes  more  than  any  other  type. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Soil  Survey  of  Cass  County,  Indiana.  201 

Fox  Loam. 

Properties, — The  Fox  loam  has  a  surface  of  a  gray  to  a  brownish 
color  with  a  friable  loamy  texture  to  an  average  depth  of  ten  inches. 
The  surface  becomes  lighter  in  color  as  the  amount  of  sand  increases. 
The  subsoil  becomes  sandy,  while  in  some  cases,  as  near  Hoover,  it 
changes  to  gravel.    The  surface  is  level  to  slightly  undulating. 

The  natural  drainage  of  this  type  of  soil  is  usually  good,  although 
during  dry  seasons  it  has  a  tendency  to  drought. 

Crops  Grotvn, — The  crops  grown  and  yield  per  acre  are  similar  to 
those  of  the  Miami  series. 

Fox  Sandy  Loam. 

Properties. — The  surface  soil  of  the  Fox  sandy  loam  is  a  gray  to 
brownish  sandy  loam.  TTie  subsoil  is  lighter  in  color  and  in  the  upper 
part  has  the  same  composition  as  the  top  soil,  but  becoming  heavier 
with  depth.  At  a  depth  of  twenty-four  inches  it  is  a  fine  sandy  clay, 
becoming  lighter  in  color,  often  changing  to  a  layer  of  sand  in  the 
three-foot  section.  Coarse  gravel  also  may  occur.  This  type  occurs  as 
a  river  terrace  along  the  stream  valleys.  The  surface  is  level  or  pitted 
and  sometimes  rolling,  due  to  erosion. 

The  Fox  sandy  loam  with  the  clay  subsoil  around  Hoover  holds  the 
moisture  during  the  dry,  growing  season,  as  the  clay  prevents  evapo- 
ration. It  yields  from  forty  to  fifty  bushels  of  com,  fifteen  to  thirty 
bushels  of  wheat  and  about  fifty  bushels  of  oats  per  acre. 

Genesee  Loam. 

Properties. — This  soil  consists  of  a  light  brown  loam  to  a  sandy  or 
silty  loam.  The  subsoil  is  very  similar  in  texture  to  the  soil,  but  is 
usually  lighter  brown  in  color.  Below  eighteen  to  twenty  inches  the 
substratum  is  frequently  made  up  of  horizontal  beds  of  sand  and  clay. 

The  Genesee  loam  is  an  alluvial  soil  and  its  variation  in  structure 
is  due  to  the  same  causes  as  in  the  case  of  the  sandy  loam.  It  has  a 
level  to  somewhat  broken  topography  and  occurs  along  the  sources  of 
streams. 

Agricultural  Conditions. — The  Genesee  loam  is  used  for  the  growing 
of  grain  crops,  particularly  com.  It  is  productive,  easily  cultivated, 
and  readily  kept  in  good  condition.  A  great  deal  of  the  land  is  used  for 
pasture  purposes. 

The  drainage  is  usually  good,  but  it  does  not  stand  dry  weather  as 
well  as  soils  with  a  very  high  clay  content. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


202        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Genesee  Fine  Sandy  Loam. 

Characteristics, — The  Genesee  fine  sandy  loam  consists  of  a  variable 
light  brown  to  dark  brown  medium  heavy  fine  sandy  loam  rang^ing  from 
ten  to  twenty  inches  deep. 

The  subsoil  has  about  the  same  texture,  but  usually  of  a  lighter 
color.  There  are  in  places  local  variations  from  the  typical  Genesee, 
due  to  the  variations  of  the  flow  of  the  depositing  water.  Sand  and 
silt  areas  are  due  to  erosion  and  depositing  by  the  overflow  waters. 
It  is  subject  to  frequent  or  annual  overflow. 

The  Genesee  forms  the  flood  plains  of  all  the  streams.  Some  of  the 
areas  mapped  as  Genesee  are  the  same  as  those  usually  called  meadow 
land.  The  two  were  not  separated.  The  boundary  between  the  Clyde 
series  and  the  Genesee  series  is  not  distinct.  Since  the  Genesee  fine 
sandy  loam  is  an  alluvial  soil,  it  varies  in  short  distances,  owing  to  the 
changes  in  the  current  of  the  streams  at  various  flood  stages.  Near 
the  streams  and  across  the  sharper  bends,  where  the  currents  were 
sharp,  the  coarser  particles  were  deposited,  and  in  many  cases  the  soil 
has  a  large  proportion  of  coarse  sand.  Near  the  larger  bends,  or  where 
the  water  found  settling  basins,  where  the  water  was  less  turbulent, 
the  finer  material  was  deposited,  giving  rise  to  the  heavier  and  more 
silty  type,  usually  of  a  darker  color.  Mixture  of  the  fine  clay  or  silty 
material  with  the  right  proportion  of  sand  is  the  basis  of  the  Genesee 
fine  sandy  loam. 

Agricultural  Conditions, — The  bottoms  are  flooded  annually,  or 
oftener,  and  in  places  are  cut  by  smaller  streams  and  branches  tributary 
to  the  main  stream.  The  drainage  is  usually  good  and-  the  land  dries 
rapidly  after  a  rain.  It  is  a  soil  that  is  friable,  easy  to  till,  and,  where 
protected  from  overflow,  is  admirably  adapted  to  com,  oats,  clover  or 
timothy.     A  great  deal  of  the  rougher  land  is  in  pasture. 

The  fertility  of  the  Genesee  fine  sandy  loam  is  renewed  each  time 
it  is  flooded  by  high  water,  making  the  growing  of  leguminous  crops  of 
less  importance.  Thorough  cultivation  is  necessary  to  keep  down  the 
large  number  of  weeds  springing  up  from  the  seed  brought  in  by  high 
water. 

The  flood  of  1913  took  off  all  the  top  layer  of  soil  of  a  field  along 
the  Wabash  River.  It  was  planted  in  com  that  year  and  yielded  ten 
bushels  to  the  acre.  Oats  made  ten  bushels  per  acre  the  next  year,  but 
a  good  stand  of  clover  was  obtained.  Two  years  later  the  field  yielded 
eighty  bushels  of  corn  per  acre.  This  goes  to  show  the  vital  importance 
of  clover  on  river-bottom  land. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Soil  Survey  of  Cdss  County,  Indiana.  203 

Dunkirk  Loamy  Fine  Sand. 

Characteristics. — The  surface  of  this  type  is  a  yellowish  gray  to 
brown  fine  sandy  loam.  At  six  to  ten  inches  it  gradually  changes  to  a 
fine  yellowish  sand,  with  perhaps  a  small  amount  of  clay.  The  subsoil 
is  variable,  ranging  from  almost  pure  sand  to  a  very  sandy  loam. 

The  topogrraphy  of  the  Dunkirk  fine  loamy  sand  ranges  from  almost 
level  to  a  rolling  surface  comprised  of  a  series  of  sand  ridges,  the 
valleys  holding  the  Clyde  fine  sandy  loam.  The  Dunkirk  loamy  fine 
sand  usually  borders  the  muck  patches,  forming  sand  ridges. 

Drainage. — The  drainage  is  good,  except  in  the  narrow,  depressed 
valleys,  which  are  poorly  drained. 

Crops  Groum. — Corn  and  oats  do  well  on  this  type  where  the  organic 
content  is  well  supplied.  Wheat  does  well  when  it  has  a  favorable 
-winter.  Cow  peas  seem  to  be  the  best  crop  to  supply  plant  food,  as  it 
can  be  grown  more  easily  than  clover.  Most  of  the  crop,  however, 
should  be  plowed  under.  The  agricultural  practices  given  for  the  Miami 
series  apply  here. 

Dunkirk  Fine  Sand. 

Characteristics. — The  Dunkirk  fine  sand  occurs  as  a  fine  yellowish 
sand  in  ridges  on  the  border  of  the  lake  plane  region.  These  ridges  are 
resting  on  a  clay  bottom.  In  some  instances  the  clay  seems  to  form  the 
core  of  the  ridge,  the  sand  forming  a  sort  of  veneer.  The  loose  drift 
sand  was  formed  in  unequal  ridges  by  the  wind  blowing  it  in  one  direc- 
tion, forming  a  gentle  slope  on  the  windward  side  and  a  sharp,  abrupt 
slope  on  the  leeward  side. 

The  sand  blows  on  the  surrounding  land,  smothering  the  vegetation 
and  beating  the  tender  leaves  to  strings  in  the  early  spring.  Care  must 
be  taken  to  keep  a  cover  crop  on  all  ridges  and  sandy  areas  that  have* 
a  tendency  to  be  moved  by  the  wind.  Rye  is  a  good  crop  for  this 
purpose. 

Crops  Groum. — Com  and  oats  do  moderately  well  on  this  type.  Wheat 
does  very  well,  while  navy  beans  are  grown  to  some  extent.  A  sand 
ridge  is  always  damp  just  under  the  surface  during  the  dryest  weather. 
The  crop  yield  is  usually  limited  by  the  amount  of  available  plant  food. 
This  is  difficult  to  retain  because  of  the  bleaching  power  of  the  soil 
water.  Clover  is  a  good  crop  for  green  manure,  or  perhaps  a  better 
crop  is  cow  peas. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


204        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Muck. 

Characteristics, — Muck  is  a  dark  brown  to  black  mixture  composed 
of  the  organic  remains  of  swamp  vegetation  in  various  stages  of  oxida- 
tion, mixed  with  varying  quantities  of  sand,  clay  and  silt.  It  ranges 
from  two  or  three  feet  to  many  feet  in  depth.  On  the  outer  margins 
the  muck  merges  into  the  Clyde  series. 

Most  of  the  muck  occurs  north  of  the  Wabash  and  in  many  areas  is 
bordered  by  sand  ridges.  The  surface  is  level,  and  before  it  is  drained 
it  is  covered  with  water,  forming  a  marsh.  Many  of  the  areas  were 
known  as  prairie  by  the  early  settlers.  They  were  covered  with  a 
growth  of  sedges,  marsh  grass,  etc.  At  the  present  time  it  is  usually 
drained  by  dredge  ditches.  When  it  is  properly  drained  and  sown  in 
grass  it  forms  fine  meadow  or  pasture  land,  in  fact  that  seems  to  be 
the  most  satisfactory  farm  crop  to  use. 

Crops  Groivn. — It  produces  good  crops  of  corn  where  the  frost  does 
not  get  it  in  the  late  spring  or  early  fall,  but  this  land  is  affected  most 
of  all.  Most  muck  is  deficient  in  potash,  which  can  be  supplied  by 
manure  and  potash  salts.  Grains  grow  too  rank  and  lodge  badly.  Muck 
is  well  adapted  to  the  growth  of  onions,  celery,  cabbage,  lettuce,  beets, 
turnips,  cauliflower  and  Irish  potatoes.  It  is  especially  used  for  gar- 
dening when  close  to  town. 

Meadow. 

Meadow  represents  the  variable  soil  conditions  encountered  in  the 
narrow,  trough-like  valleys  of  the  streams.  It  consists  of  alluvial  mate- 
rial, varying  from  almost  pure  sand  to  silt  or  clay,  and  is  usually  sub- 
ject to  overflow  with  very  high  water.  Part  of  it  is  in  cultivation,  but 
most  of  it  is  in  pasture,  trees,  underbrush  and  weeds.  This  type  is  not 
shown  separately  on  the  map,  but  is  included  with  the  Genesee  series. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Velocity  op  Sound  Waves  in  Tubes. 


Arthur  L.  Foley,  Indiana  University. 


(Author's  Publication  No.  45.) 

In  1862-63  Regnault,  in  Paris,  made  an  elaborate  series  of  experi- 
ments on  the  velocity  of  sound  in  newly  laid  water  pipes.  As  sources 
of  sound  he  used  a  pistol,  explosions,  and  musical  instruments.  Both 
ends  of  the  pipe  were  closed  and  the  sound  was  produced  at  one  end. 
Thus  the  wave  passed  back  and  forth  through  the  pipe  many  times,  its 
time  of  arrival  at  the  ends  being  recorded  on  a  chronograph  drum  by 
a  stylus  operated  electrically  when  the  sound  wave  impinged  on  a  thin 
membrane  and  closed  an  electric  circuit.  Figure  1  shows  graphically 
the  results  of  Regnault's  experiments. 


5000  10.000  15.000 

0/ stances  traversed  m  the  Pipes 

Fig.  1. 
(205> 


20.000 
Metres 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


206        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

It  will  be  noted  that  Regnault  obtains  a  velocity  of  334.2  m./sec.  near 
the  source  in  a  pipe  110  cm.  in  diameter,  and  that  the  velocity  at  2,000  m. 
from  the  source  has  decreased  to  330.5  m./sec.  A  pipe  10.8  cm.  in  diam- 
eter gave  a  smaller  initial  velocity  and  a  much  more  rapid  variation  of 
that  velocity  with  distance  from  the  source.  (The  curve  indicates,  too, 
a  much  greater  total  variation  in  the  case  of  a  small  pipe.)  Regnault 
concluded  that:  (1)  The  velocity  of  sound  in  pipes  varies  inversely  w^ith 
the  diameter;  (2)  the  velocity  decreases  as  the  distance  from  the  source 
increases;  (3)  the  limiting  velocity  is  the  same  for  all  sources. 

Rink  objected  to  Regnault's  deductions  and  explained  the  greater 
initial  velocity  as  due  to  the  fact  that,  during  the  first  few^  coursings, 
the  sound  wave  would  be  traveling  in  air  moving  bodily  as  the  result 
of  the  explosion  which  produced  the  wave. 

TABLE  I. 
Rink's  Analytia  of  RegnauWt  E:periment». 


No.  of 
Experi- 
ment. 

Charge 
of  Gun 
Powder 
in  Pistol 
in  Gm«. 

Speed  in  cm.  per  Sec.  of  Each  Passage  of  Sound  Along  Pipe 
110  cm.  Diameter. 

Meaa 
Speed  for 

Given 

Charge  of 

Ponder 

3rd 
Passage 

4th 
Passage 

6th 
Passage 

6th 
Passage 

7th 
Passage 

8th 
Passage 

1 
2 
3 
4 
6 
6 

0.5 
1.0 
1.5 
2 

1 
1 

330.02 
330.36 
330.29 
330.60 
330.04 
330.36 

330.29 
330.59 
330.57 
330.51 
330.26 
330.37 

330  15 
330.57 
330.54 
330.84 
330.26 
330.50 

330.21 
330.61 
330.47 
330.44 
330.23 
330.67 

330.11 
330.44 
330.47 
330.44 
330.15 
330.55 

330.13 
330.42 
330.53 
330.30 
230.22 
330.50 

330.152 
330  498 
330  433 
330  513 
330.193 
330.492 

MeanSpee 
PaB8ai;e 

d  for  each 

330.278 

330.428 

330.477 

330.452 

330.360 

330.330 

The  above  table  gives  the  results  of  Rink*s  analysis  of  Regnault's 
experiments  and  appears  to  confirm  Rink's  contention  that  the  true 
velocity  of  sound  in  a  given  pipe  is  constant,  the  result  for  a  pipe  110  cm. 
in  diameter  being  330.5  m./sec.  For  a  pipe  7  cm.  in  diameter  LeRoux, 
using  Regnault's  methods,  obtained  a  velocity  of  330.66  m./sec. 

Regnault,  in  1865,  by  the  reciprocal  firing  of  guns,  the  explosion 
breaking  an  electrical  circuit  at  the  source,  the  wave — by  moving  a 
membrane — breaking  another  circuit  at  a  distant  point,  both  circuits 
making  stylus  records  on  the  same  chronograph,  obtained  velocities  of 
331.37  m./sec.  and  330.7  m./sec.  at  distances  respectively  of  1,280  m. 
and  2,445  m.  from  the  source.  In  all  of  Regnault's  experiments  efforts 
were  made  to  determine  and  to  correct  for  the  time  lag  of  the  recording 
apparatus.  The  error  due  to  this  cause  can  not  be  entirely  eliminated 
for  two  reasons.  In  the  first  place  the  lag  depends  on  the  intensity  of 
the  wave  and  is  therefore  a  function  of  the  distance  from  the  source. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Velocity  of  Sound  Waves  in  Tubes. 


261 


In  the  second  place  the  sound  produced  by  a  pistol  or  cannon  is,  near 
the  source,  a  pulse  whose  wave  curve  is  short  and  steep.  As  the  dis- 
tance from  the  source  increases  the  wave  type  changes.  This  change 
of  wave  form  would  of  itself  cause  a  variation  in  the  time  lag  of  the 
device.  However,  the  unavoidable  sources  of  error  in  Regnault's  work 
are  not  sufficient  to  cast  doubt  on  his  conclusions  that  the  velocity  of 
sound  decreases  as  the  intensity  decreases.  Indeed,  other  experimenters 
using-  other  methods  have  arrived  at  a  similar  conclusion,  a  conclusion 
in  accord  with  theory. 

Referring  to  Rink's  table  of  Regnault's  results  from  which  Rink 
concludes  that  the  velocity  of  sound  in  a  pipe  110  cm.  in  diameter  is 
practically  constant,  one  may  conclude  that  the  apparent  constancy  is 
due  to  the  fact  that,  in  such  a  tube,  the  intensity  of  the  sound  wave 
varies  very  slowly  with  the  distance  from  the  source.  In  very  small 
tubes  and  in  tubes  with  rough  walls  or  with  walls  of  material  capable 
of  absorbing  some  of  the  energy  of  the  wavies,  the  intensity  would  vary 
more  rapidly  with  increasing  distance  from  the  source,  and  one  would 
expect  a  greater  variation  in  the  velocity.  Experiments  confirm  this 
conclusion. 

TABLE  11. 


Observer 

Method 

Frequency 

Diameter  and 
Material  of  Tube 

Velocity 

m  /sec. 

Wertheim,  1844 

Organ  Pipe 

1.0  cm.  Brass  .     . 

2.0  cm.  BraHs 

2.0  cm.  Glass 

4.0  cm.  Brass 

329  12 

330.11 
330.23 
332  10 

Fiegnault.  Mem.  de  I'Acacl 

Paris.  37.  I.  3.  1868.  C.  R. 
B  66.  s  209,  1868. 

See  Fig.  2  and  explana- 
tion. 

Rink,  Pork.  .Ann.  B  149 

See  Fig.  2  and  explana- 
tion. 

Explosion. . 

110  cm.  Iron 

330.5 

a  533.  1873. 

Kundt.   P(m.  Ann.  B  135 

8  333U.  527.   1868. 

Double  Kundt 's  tube  . 

9 

3.5  cm.  Glass 

6.5  cm.  Glass 

13.0  cm.  Glass 

305.42 
323.00 
329.47 

Seebeck.   Pogg.  Ann.  B  139 

s  104,  1870. 

Kundt 's  tube 

320 
320 
320 
512 
512 
512 

.34  cm.  Glass 

.9   cm.  Gla.ss 

1.75  cm.  Glass  ..  . 

.34  cm.  Glass 

.9   cm.  Glass 

1.75  cm.  Glass 

317  26 

328.02 
329.24 
322.98 
328.44 
330.92 

IjB  Roux.  Ann.  Chem.  Phys 

Sim i  liar  to  Rcgnault's 
method 

ExploHion. . 

7.0  cm 

330.66 

(4)  12.  345,  1867 

BJaikley.  Phil  Mag.  V  16 

p.  447,  1883. 

Special  form  of  organ 
pipe. 

105 

1.17cm.  Brass.... 
1.95  cm.  Brass   ... 
3.25cm.  Brass.... 

5.41  cm.  Brass 

8.82  cm.  Brass.... 

324.56 
326.90 
328.78 
1329.72 
330.13 

Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


208        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


TABLE  II— Continued. 


Observer 

Method 

Frequency 

Diameter  and 
Material  of  Tube 

Velocity 

m./sec. 

J.  Muller.  Ann.  d.  Phys 

Kundt's  tube 

903 

903 

902 

2.482 

.372cm.  Glass.... 

.678  cm.  Glass ... 
1.552  cm.  Glass... 

.372  cm.  Glass... 

.678cm.  Glass..   . 
1.552  cm.  Glass 

317.2 

B  11.  8  331.   1903. 

322  9 
327.3 
323.0 
325.4 
330.2 

Schulue.  Ann.  d.  Phys 

Quincke's  double  tube 

384 
384 
612 
512 
384 
384 
512 
512 
512 

.101  cm.  Glass... 
.151  cm.  Glass. ... 
.101cm.  Glass... 
.151cm.  Glass  ... 
.099cm.  Brass  ... 
.148  cm.  Brass... 
.099cm.  Brass.... 
.148  cm.  Brass... 
.  150  cm.  Rubber.. 

258 

B  l.t.  8  1060.   1904. 

282 
265 
290 
189 
230 
208 
253 
195 

In  Table  II,  I  have  tabulated  some  of  the  results  obtained  by  a  few 
of  the  many  observers  who  have  determined  experimentally  the  velocity 
of  sound  in  tubes.  The  results  shown  are  not  uniform,  but  in  general 
they  tend  to  show  that — 

(1)  The  velocity  of  sound  in  tubes  is  less  than  in  free  air. 

(2)  The  smaller  the  tube  the  smaller  the  velocity. 

(3)  The  higher  the  frequency  the  less  the  retardation. 

(4)  The  velocity  depends  more  or  less  upon  the  material  of  the 

walls  of  the  tube. 

(5)  The  greater  the  intensity  of  the  sound  the  greater  is  its 

velocity. 

The  last-named  conclusion  is  not  drawn  from  Table  II,  but  from  the 
origrinal  papers  there  referred  to.  It  must  be  said,  however,  that  the 
observers  referred  to  are  not  a  unit  in  supporting  the  five  conclusions 
above  named.  Other  observers  are  equally  at  variance.  For  instance, 
Violle  and  Vautier*  after  a  study  of  the  velocity  of  sound  in  a  masonry 
conduit  3  m.  in  diameter,  the  sounds  being  produced  by  various  musical 
instruments  and  rang^ing  in  frequency  from  32  to  640,  arrived  at  the 
conclusion  that  in  such  a  pipe  the  velocity  is  constant  to  within  one  part 
in  a  thousand.  Rink's  analysis  of  Regnault's  results,  given  in  Table  I, 
v^rould  seem  to  show  a  velocity  independent  of  sound  intensity. 

As  a  whole,  however,  the  conclusions  given  are  supported  by  experi- 

1  Violle  and  Vautier.     Ann.  Chem.  Phys.   (8)   5.     208,   1905. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Velocity  of  Sound  Waves  in  Tubes. 


209 


ment,  and  are  in  accord  with  the  theoretical  conclusions  of  Helmholtz,' 
Kirchoff,'  Rayleigh,'  and  others  who  have  attacked  the  subject.  The 
equations  of  both  Helmholtz  and  Kirchoff  may  be  reduced  to  the  form 


v(l- 


2rjx  n 


where  i''  is  the  speed  of  sound  of  frequency  n  in  a  pipe  of  radius  r,  and 
V  is  the  velocity  in  free  air.  According  to  Helmholtz  c  is  the  viscosity 
of  the  gas,  according  to  Kirchoff  it  is  a  term  depending  on  the  heat 
conduction  between  gas  and  pipe  walls,  according  to  Miiller^  the  equa- 
tion has  no  general  validity,  according  to  Schulze'  the  "constant"  c  was 
found  to  range  between  0.0075  and  0.025,  depending  on  the  diameter  and 
nature  of  the  tube. 


FiK.  2. 

Sturm*  found  that  Kirchoff *s  formula  was  not  valid  for  different 
tubes  and  frequencies.  On  the  other  hand  Wertheim's'  results  supported 
the  equation,  while  Schneebele'  and  Seebeck*  obtained  results  that  sup- 

1  Helmholtz,   Wessensch.  Abhandl.   B   1.  b  383,   1882. 
=  Kirchoflf.  Pog.  Ann.   B   134,  a  77.   1868. 

'  Rayleigh's  Theory  of  Sound,  Vol.  — ,  p.  — .  Also  Lamb's  Dynamical  Theory  of 
Sound,  p.   190. 

*  See  Table  II. 

5  See  Table  II. 

«J.    Sturm.   Ann.   d.   Phys.   B    M.   s   822,   1904. 

'  Citation  in  Table  II. 

"PoKK.  Ann.  B  136,  8  296,  1869. 

»See  Table  II. 

14—16568 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


^10        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

ported  the  equation  only  as  far  as  concerns  variation  of  speed  with 
diameter  of  pipe,  and  were  in  disagreement  as  to  the  effect  of  pitch. 
There  is  therefore  no  consensus  of  opinion  on  any  of  the  points  con- 
cerning the  velocity  of  sound  waves  in  tubes.  It  will  be  noted,  however, 
that  in  no  case  has  an  observer  claimed  a  greater  speed  in  pipes  than  in 
the  open.     The  writer  has  obtained  such  results. 

Figure  2  shows  the  general  arrangement  of  the  apparatus  used  in 
this  experiment.  The  reader  is  referred  to  earlier  papers*  for  a  more 
detailed  description  and  explanation.  It  will  suffice  here  to  say  that 
two  spark  gaps  S  and  I  are  in  series  and  connected — through  two  vari- 
able gaps  G,  G — to  the  terminals  of  a  powerful  electrostatic  machine. 
When  the  gaps  G  and  G  are  shortened  a  discharge  passes  through  the 
commutator  C  to  the  circuit  including  the  sound  gap  S  and  the  illumin- 
ating gap  I,  the  latter  spark  being  retarded  slightly  by  a  variable  ca- 
pacity K.  By  varying  the  capacity  K  and  the  length  of  the  gap  I,  the 
light  from  the  spark  at  I  can  be  adjusted  to  cast  a  shadow  on  a  photo- 
graphic plate  P  of  the  sound  wave  produced  by  the  spark  at  S. 

Plate  I  shows  such  a  wave.  The  sound  spark  was  produced  just 
behind  the  center  of  the  circular  screen  (a  hard  rubber  disk)  D,  the 
screen  being  used  merely  to  prevent  fogging  the  dry  plate  by  the  light 
of  the  sound  spark.  T  is  an  end-on  shadow  of  a  portion  of  a  piece  of 
brass  tubing  3  cm.  in  diameter  and  5  cm.  long.  The  projecting  arms 
are  four  pieces  of  brass  tubing,  respectively  0.25  cm.,  0.48  cm.,  0.8  cm., 
and  1.15  cm.  in  internal  diameter,  each  of  them  2.4  cm.  long.  They  were 
soldered  radially  in  holes  whose  diameters  corresponded  respectively  to 
the  outside  diameters  of  the  tubes.  Almost  half  of  the  side  wall  of  the 
supporting  tube  was  then  cut  away,  to  permit  the  sound  wave  to  travel 
out  on  one  side  in  free  air,  while  on  the  other  side  the  wave  was  arrested 
except  for  the  portions  passing  through  the  four  radial  tubes.  The 
sound  gap  was  placed  as  accurately  as  possible  at  the  center  of  the 
supporting  tube  and  the  point  of  intersection  of  the  axes  of  the  radial 
tubes. 

In  order  to  show  at  a  glance  just  what  has  happened  with  the  posi- 
tion of  the  sound  gap  as  center  I  have  drawn  a  broken  line  circle.  To 
avoid  confusion  I  have  drawn  the  circle  C  just  outside  the  main  wave  W. 
It  will  be  noted  that  the  waves  through  the  tubes  lie  well  without  the 
circle,  showing  that  the  waves  in  the  tube  traveled  more  rapidly  than 
the  wave  in  free  air,  and  that  apparently  the  velocities  in  the  several 
tubes  were  the  same,  although  the  tube  diameters  were  in  the  approxi- 
mate ratios  of  1,  2,  3  and  5. 

On  the  negative  from  which  Plate  I  is  a  reduced  print  the  waves 

*  Physical  Review,  Vol.  36,  p.  373,  1912.  Also  Proceedinsrs  Indiana  Academy  of 
Science,  p.  305,  1915. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Velocity  of  Sound  Waves  in  Tubes. 


211 


through  the  tubes  measured  .48  cm.  in  advance  of  the  free  air  wave 
and  the  tube  length  shadows  were  4.56  cm.  long.  Assuming  that  the 
entire  gain  in  space  traversed  occurred  while  the  waves  were  inside 
the  tubes  (an  assumption  which  I  think  is  not  entirely  true)  we  would 
have  a  relative  increase  of  velocity  within  the  tubes  of  .48  -^  4.56,  or 
10.5  percent. 


Plate  I. 

It  happens  that  none  of  the  observations  of  Table  II  was  made  with 
a  tube  of  the  same  size  as  the  smallest  one  used  by  the  author.  For 
a  tube  about  40  percent  larger  Seebeck  and  Miiller  obtained  values 
approximately  5  percent  less  than  the  free  air  velocity — depending  on 
the  pitch  of  the  sound.  Thus  it  would  appear  that  the  total  difference 
between  their  and  the  writer's  results  is  in  the  neighborhood  of  15 
percent. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


212        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 

Plate  II  was  obtained  by  replacing  the  four  short  tubes  with  two 
longer  tubes,  of  internal  diameter  .25  cm.  and  1.15  cm.  respectively, 
each  10  cm.  long,  and  adjusted  radially  as  in  Plate  I.  Note  that  in 
this  case  the  wave  through  the  small  tube  is  actually  slightly  in  advance 
of  the  wave  through  the  large  tube,  the  distances  on  the  original  plate 


Plate  II. 

being  .89  cm.  and  .84  cm.  respectively.  The  wave  near  the  gap  is  the 
reflected  wave  from  the  side  of  the  box  which  enclosed  the  gaps  and 
dry  plate.  The  percent  increase  in  velocity  in  this  case  is  obtained  as 
before  by  dividing  .89  by  16.5,  the  length  of  the  tube  shadow  on  the 
negative.  This  gives  5.4  percent,  about  half  the  value  obtained  with  the 
shorter  tubes,  which  were  about  one-fourth  as  long  as  the  two  shown  on 
Plate  II.     The  gain  in  distance  traversed  was  0.48  cm.   for   the  small 


Digiti 


zedbyGodgle 


Velocity  of  Sound  Waves  in  Tubes.  213 

tube  when  2.4  cm.  long,  and  0.89  cm.  when  10  cm.  long.  It  would  appear 
from  this  that  more  than  half  the  gain  was  made  in  the  first  fourth  of 
the  tube's  length,  and  that  if  the  tube  were  long  enough  the  velocity 
might  drop  to  the  values  obtained  by  other  experimenters,  or  even  below 
— for  their  results  are  averages  over  considerable  leng:ths  of  tubes. 

The  writer  gives  the  calculations  above — far  Plates  I  and  II — merely 
as  an  illustration  of  what  occurred  in  these  two  cases,  and  not  because 
he  attaches  any  significance  whatever  to  the  numbers  given.  As  a 
matter  of  fact,  the  numbers  have  no  significance.  In  every  case  I  have 
tried,  the  waves  through  the  tubes  have  been  in  advance  of  those  in 
free  air,  but  the  gain  has  been  quite  variable.  I  am  now  endeavoring 
to  determine  the  cause  of  the  increased  velocity,  and  the  reasons  for 
its  variation.  I  have  secured  a  number  of  photographs  of  the  waves 
through  a  10  cm.  and  a  15  cm.  tube  placed  side  by  side,  with  their  ends 
at  different  distances  from  the  sound  spark.  This  investigation  is  not 
complete,  but  it  has  gone  far  enough  for  me  to  say  that  the  velocity  of 
a  pulse  through  a  tube  is  greatest  when  the  end  of  the  tube  is  nearest 
the  sound  spark,  indicating  that  it  is  a  question  of  sound  intensity. 
The  sound  for  a  time  travels  faster  in  the  tube  than  it  does  outside 
because  the  intensity  of  the  wave  in  the  tube  decreases  less  rapidly  than 
in  free  space. 

This  experiment  appears  to  settle  conclusively  the  question  as  to  the 
dependence  of  sound  velocity  upon  intensity  independent  of  any  varia- 
tions caused  by  motion  of  air  in  a  body,  as  contended  by  Rink  in  the 
case  of  Regnault's  experiments.  I  shall  discuss  in  a  later  paper  the 
question  of  what  happens  to  the  air  when  a  spark  passes. 

Physics  Laboratory,  Indiana  University,  January,  1919. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Dr.  Luther  D.  Waterman. 


(211) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Luther  Dana  Waterman. 


Arthur  L.  Foley. 


Dr.  Luther  Dana  Waterman  was  born  in  Wheeling,  West  Virginia, 
November  21,  1830;  died  at  Indianapolis,  Indiana,  June  30,  1918,  age 
eighty-seven  years,  seven  months  and  nine  days.  Dr.  Waterman  was 
the  son  of  Joseph  Aplin  and  Susan  (Dana)  Waterman,  the  father  being 
a  native  of  Cornish,  New  Hampshire,  the  mother  of  Belfry,  Ohio.  The 
mother  died  in  1837,  leaving  five  young  children,  of  whom  Luther,  the 
subject  of  this  sketch,  but  seven  years  old,  was  next  to  the  oldest.  On 
the  death  of  the  mother  Luther  went  to  live  with  his  grandmother  at 
Oxford,  Ohio.  Although  his  father  later  remarried,  Luther  continued 
to  make  his  home  with  his  grandmother  until  he  had  completed  the  work 
of  the  public  schools  of  Oxford  and  entered  upon  a  college  course  at 
Miami  University. 

The  -father,  Joseph  Aplin  Waterman,  was  a  farmer  in  his  earlier 
years.  Later  he  became  a  physician  and  still  later  a  Methodist  minister. 
It  appears  that  he  was  successful  in  each  of  these  callings,  particularly 
as  a  minister.  It  is  said  that  he  was  not  only  a  zealous  expounder  of 
the  Gospel  but  that  he  was  an  earnest  and  capable  biblical  student.  He 
died  at  Oxford,  Ohio,  at  the  age  of  fifty-five  years. 

Luther's  maternal  great-grandfather  was  Captain  William  Dana, 
who  was  in  charge  of  one  of  the  companies  from  New  England  that, 
under  General  Putnam,  settled  at  Fort  Marietta,  now  the  city  of  Ma- 
rietta, Ohio. 

Dr.  Waterman's  early  education  was  obtained  in  the  public  schools 
at  Oxford,  Ohio,  where  he  was  known  as  a  very  capable  and  ambitious 
lad.  After  completing  the  work  of  the  public  schools,  he  attended  Miami 
University  four  years,  and  the  Medical  College  of  Ohio,  at  Cincinnati, 
two  years.  During  his  college  work  he  was  frequently  obliged  to  drop 
out  and  teach  a  term  to  get  money  to  continue  his  college  work.  At  one 
time  while  a  student  in  Cincinnati  he  got  so  near  the  end  of  his  resources 
that  his  only  alternative  appeared  to  be  to  drop  his  medical  work  and 
seek  employment.  As  a  last  resort  he  decided  to  try  for  a  prize  of  fifty 
dollars  offered  by  one  of  the  Cincinnati  papers  for  the  best  poem  for 
the  coming  New  Year's  edition.  By  New  Year's  day  young  Waterman's 
funds  were  so  low  that  he  did  not  have  money  enough  to  buy  a  paper 
to  see  whether  or  not  he  had  won  the  prize,  and  it  was  by  accident  that 


(216^ 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


216        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

he  learned  of  his  success.  He  spent  a  part  of  the  prize  money  to  buy 
a  pocket  set  of  surgical  instruments.  He  used  these  instruments  during 
his  forty  years  of  surgical  practice  and  it  was  with  pride  that  he  ex- 
hibited them  to  his  friends,  particularly  after  he  and  the  instruments 
had  "retired." 

Dr.  Waterman  graduated  from  the  Medical  College  of  Ohio  in  1853. 
For  two  years  after  graduation  he  practiced  medicine  in  Cincinnati, 
and,  like  the  usual  young  doctor,  was  not  burdened  with  patients.  Con- 
cluding that  he  could  do  better  in  a  smaller  town,  he  moved  to  Kokomo, 
Indiana,  in  1855,  and  established  a  partnership  with  Dr.  Cory  don  Rich- 
mond. The  move  proved  to  be  a  very  wise  one.  The  population  of  the 
town  and  surrounding  country  grew  rapidly  and  with  it  the  practice 
and  reputation  of  the  firm  of  Richmond  &  Waterman.  For  several  years 
these  doctors  led  a  very  strenuous  life — with  an  office  full  of  patients 
and  constant  calls  for  country  trips  through  swamps  and  over  corduroy 
roads.  Although  Dr.  Waterman  remained  in  Kokomo  but  six  years, 
leaving  there  in  1861  to  become  a  surgeon  in  the  Union  Army,  never- 
theless it  was  at  Kokomo  that  he  got  the  practical  experience  that  made 
his  work  with  the  army  so  successful,  and  it  was  there  that  he  secured 
the  nucleus  of  his  later  fortune. 

Being  a  man  of  strong  idealism  and  patriotism,  Dr.  Waterman  did 
not  hesitate  a  moment,  when  the  integrity  of  the  Union  was  threatened, 
to  sacrifice  a  large  and  lucrative  practice  to  offer  his  services  to  the 
Government.  In  August,  1861,  he  was  commissioned  Surgeon  of  the 
Thirty-ninth  Regiment,  Indiana  Volunteer  Infantry.  Although  his  total 
service  in  the  Army  extended  over  a  period  of  three  years  and  two 
months,  nevertheless  he  was  not  with  the  Thirty-ninth  Regiment  much 
of  the  time,  being  frequently  detailed  to  other  companies  and  to  hos- 
pitals. During  his  three  years  of  service  he  was  Surgeon  of  the  Eighth 
Indiana  Cavalry,  Medical  Director  of  the  Second  Division  of  the  Second 
Army  Corps,  Army  of  the  Cumberland,  then  Medical  Director  of  the 
First  Division  of  the  same  Corps,  and  during  the  absence  of  superior 
officers  was  Medical  Director  for  a  month  of  the  Corps  under  General 
Phil  Sheridan.  He  was  Surgeon  at  the  hospitals  at  Huntsville,  Ala- 
bama, and  at  Bridgeport  and  Chattanooga,  Tennessee.  He  was  twice 
captured  by  Confederate  forces,  once  at  Harpeth  Shoals,  Tennessee,  and 
again  at  Newman,  Georgia.  He  was  held  for  three  weeks  in  the  prison 
stockade  at  Macon,  Georgia,  and  then  transferred  to  the  workhouse 
prison  at  Charleston,  South  Carolina.  He  was  later  released  (exchanged) 
near  Fort  Sumpter. 

At  the  conclusion  of  the  war  Dr.  Waterman  located  at  Indianapolis 
and  once  again  began  to  build  up  a  practice.  He  soon  came  to  be  rec- 
ognized as  a  successful  surgeon  and  one  of  the  best  general  practitioners 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Luther  Dana  Waterman.  217 

in  the  State.  He  was  for  several  years  one  of  the  surgeons  of  the  City 
Hospital  and  was  one  of  the  charter  organizers  of  the  old  Indiana  Med- 
ical College,  in  which  he  was  Professor  of  Anatomy  from  1869  to  1873, 
and  Professor  of  Principles  and  Practice  of  Medicine  from  1875  to  1877. 
With  the  consolidation  of  the  several  medical  schools  of  the  State  into 
the  Indiana  University  School  of  Medicine,  Dr.  Waterman  became  Emer- 
itus Professor  of  Medicine.  He  was  for  many  years  an  active  member 
of  the  Indiana  State  Medical  Society,  and  was  Secretary  and  President 
of  that  organization.  It  was  in  May,  1878,  as  President  of  the  Society, 
that  he  gave  an  address  entitled  "Economy'  and  Necessity  of  a  State 
Board  of  Health."  The  address  was  published  by  the  Society  and  five 
thousand  copies  were  distributed  throughout  the  State.  In  that  address 
his  arguments  were  so  conclusively  presented  that  they  caused  a  state- 
wide movement  which  resulted  eventually  in  the  establishment  of  a 
State  Board  of  Health  in  Indiana.  Up  to  that  time  but  thirteen  States 
in  the  Union  had  provided  for  state  medical  boards,  and  all  these  had 
been  established  within  the  previous  decade. 

Dr.  Waterman  retired  from  active  practice  in  1893,  at  the  age  of 
sixty-three  years,  after  forty  years  of  practice  of  medicine  and  surgery. 
Nowadays  when  a  physician  retires  not  many  know  about  it  or  care. 
In  this  day  of  specialists,  when  a  different  one  is  employed  for  each 
and  every  ailment,  physician  and  patient  rarely  know  one  another  inti- 
mately; indeed,  they  may  not  even  be  acquaintances.  Once  each  family 
had  but  one  doctor,  regardless  of  the  nature  of  the  case.  Whatever 
such  a  physician  lacked  that  the  specialist  possesses  was  balanced  by 
the  former's  broad  and  comprehensive  knowledge  and  experience,  his 
understanding  of  the  patient's  history,  habits  and  peculiarities,  and  a 
sympathy  and  personal  interest  that  many  times  amounted  to  genuine 
affection.  Dr.  Waterman  was  such  a  physician,  a  family  physician  of 
the  highest  type,  and  there  was  sincere  regret  in  thousands  of  homes 
when  he  announced  his  retirement  from  active  practice. 

Dr.  Waterman  was  not  only  a  progressive  and  successful  physician 
and  surgeon;  he  was  a  man  of  wide  intellectual  interests,  a  constant 
reader,  all  his  life  a  student  of  science,  language  and  literature,  himself 
a  writer  of  ability. 

The  writer  remembers  well  the  first  time  he  met  Dr.  Waterman, 
then  eighty  years  of  age.  He  was  attending  a  dinner  of  the  Indiana 
Academy  of  Science  and  sat  beside  the  writer — in  order  to  discuss  the 
electron  theory.  The  last  time  the  writer  ever  saw  the  Doctor  alive 
was  when  the  Doctor  accompanied  him  on  a  two-hundred-mile  auto  trip 
to  attend  a  meeting  of  the  Indiana  Academy  at  Turkey  Run  and  The 
Shades — only  a  month  before  the  Doctor's  death.  He  was  still  inter- 
ested in  the  electron  theory.     He  was  interested,  too,  in  the  research 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


218        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 

work  of  the  Waterman  Institute  and  discussed  minutely  the  work  in 
progress.  But  what  impressed  the  writer  even  more  than  the  aged 
Doctor's  knowledge  of  and  continued  interest  in  science  was  his  knowl- 
edge of  language,  literature  and  history.  He  rarely  faltered  on  Latin 
or  Greek  derivatives  and  he  read  Spanish  readily.  In  fact,  he  was  at 
that  time  reading  a  history  of  Mexico  in  Spanish.  He  had  made  an 
extended  trip  into  Mexico  in  1886  and  had  acquired  some  knowledge  of 
the  Spanish  language.  Thirty  years  later,  at  an  age  of  more  than  four 
score,  we  find  him  reading  Spanish  and  studying  Mexican  history.  Here 
we  find  the  secret  of  Dr.  Waterman's  success.  He  had  the  desire  to 
know,  and  he  had  the  perseverance  and  energy  required  to  acquire  the 
knowledge.  In  addition  he  had  the  instincts  of  the  scientist,  the  faculty 
of  observing  details  and  appreciating  their  importance.  This  is  strik- 
ingly illustrated  in  a  paper  presented  to  the  writer  a  few  years  ago. 
It  is  a  ^our-page  description  of  an  aurora  witnessed  by  the  Doctor  when 
a  young  man,  written  as  the  display  was  taking  place.  For  vividness 
of  description  and  terse,  straight-forward  English  it  is  superior  to  most 
of  the  studied  memoirs  published  in  our  magazines  of  science.  Dr. 
Waterman's  ability  was  recognized  by  his  felma  mater,  Miami  Univer- 
sity, by  conferring  upon  him  in  1892  the  honorary  degree  M.  A. 

Dr.  Waterman  was  originally  a  Whig,  but  became  a  Republican  when 
that  party  came  into  ascendancy  and  remained  a  staunch  Republican  all 
his  life.  When  Fremont  was  running  for  President  the  Doctor  stumped 
Howard  County  in  his  behalf.  Throughout  his  life  he  remained  more 
or  less  active  in  his  party's  councils. 

At  the  time  of  his  visits  to  Europe,  1878  and  1881,  also  to  Mexico, 
1886,  Dr.  Waterman  wrote  a  number  of  articles  for  the  Indianapolis 
papers  descriptive  of  his  travels.  He  published  a  paper  on  "The  Regi- 
mental Surgeon"  in  the  Indiana  Medical  Journal,  February,  1906,  and 
a  book  of  verse,  entitled  "Phantoms  of  Life,"  in  1883.  In  this  little 
volume  he  "presented  his  philosophy  of  existence  in  stately  phrasing. 
The  ideals  there  shown  are  high,  and  those  who  knew  him  may  well 
believe  that  he  tried  to  fulfill  them."  Dr.  Waterman,  the  son  of  a 
minister,  was  not  himself  an  enrolled  member  of  any  church.  Yet  he 
was  in  thought  and  deed  a  deeply  religious  man.  At  his  funeral  both 
Jew  and  (Jentile  attested  to  the  nobility  of  his  character  and  the  grief 
his  death  brought  to  them. 

At  a  meeting  of  the  Trustees  of  Indiana  University,  May  12,  1915, 
Dr.  Waterman  placed  in  their  hands  deeds  to  property  amounting  in 
value  to  one  hundred  thousand  dollars  for  the  purpose  of  founding  an 
Institute  for  Scientific  Research.  This  is  the  largest  gift  for  scientific 
research  ever  made  in  Indiana.  Dr.  Waterman  believed  the  highest 
form  of  charity  is  to  discover  useful  truth,  and  for  this  purpose  he 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Luther  Dana  Waterman.  21d 

gave  the  savings  of  a  frugal  and  industrious  life.  The  Luther  Dana 
Waterman  Institute  for  Research  began  its  work  in  September,  1917. 
It  is  a  satisfaction  to  know  that  Dr.  Waterman  lived  to  see  the  work 
inaugurated  and  to  express  interest  in  its  progress.  It  is  to  be  regretted 
that  he  did  not  live  to  see  at  least  one  publication  from  the  Institute 
which  with  wisdom  and  generosity  he  had  established. 

At  the  Indiana  University  commencement  exercises,  June  23,  1915, 
President  Bryan  chose  Dr.  Waterman's  life  as  a  theme  for  his  address 
to  the  senior  class.  No  more  fitting  conclusion  to  this  biography  could 
be  written.     I  therefore  quote  from  President  Bryan's  address: 

"I  wish  to  say  a  few  words  to  the  oldest  member  of  our  faculty — 
Dr.  Luther  Dana  Waterman,  professor  of  medicine  emeritus. 

"Surgeon  in  the  Federal  Army,  prisoner  of  war  at  Macon  and 
Charleston,  in  civil  life  physician  and  professor  of  medicine,  you  have 
in  eighty-four  years  won  position  and  honors  and  fortune  such  that 
many  would  for  them  sacrifice  everything  else  in  the  world.  But  I 
wish  these  my  children  to  see  that  you  have  made  your  way  up  to  a 
great  practical  success  without  sacrificing  everything  else  in  the  world. 
You  have  not  sacrificed  your  interest  in  the  worlds  that  lie  outside  of 
your  vocation  of  physician.  Most  men  of  every  calling  are  caught 
within  the  trap  of  their  own  business.  Not  you.  You  have  escaped 
that  trap.  You  have  traveled  far  among  men  and  books  and  ideas. 
You  are  not  of  those  who  bear  a  title  from  the  college  of  liberal  arts 
and  are  yet  aliens  from  its  spirit.  In  the  world  of  the  liberal  arts  you 
are  a  citizen.  You  are  friend  with  Plato  and  Virgil  and  Darwin  and 
their  kind.  You  know  that  these  are  not  dead  names  in  the  academic 
catalogue,  but  living  forces  and  makers  of  society.  In  that  world  you 
have  spoken  your  own  word  in  verses  which  are  resolutely  truthful, 
discriminating  and  brave.  The  joy  of  living  as  you  have  done  in  the 
wide,  free  and  glorious  world  of  the  liberal  arts  is  such  that  many  for 
it  have  sacrificed  everything  else,  including  that  practical  success  which 
you  have  not  sacrificed. 

"But  besides  your  successes  inside  and  beyond  your  calling  you  have 
had  another  fortune.  Long  ago  there  came  to  you  an  idea.  You  had 
lived  from  the  days  of  the  tallow  candle  and  a  thousand  things  which 
went  with  that  to  the  days  of  the  electric  light  and  a  thousand  things 
w^hich  go  with  that.  Within  your  lifetime  you  had  seen  an  incredible 
access  of  power,  enlightenment  and  freedom,  from  the  discovery  of  truth 
of  which  all  preceding  generations  had  been  ignorant.  You  had  then 
the  insight,  the  conviction  that  the  Great  Charity  is  the  discovery  of 
truth,  which  is  thenceforth  light  and  power  and  freedom  for  all  men. 
This  conviction  became  your  deepest  purpose.  Thirty- two  years  ago 
you  wrote: 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


220        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 

He  who  would  make  his  life  a  precious  thinff 
Must  nurse  a  kindly  purpose  in  his  soul. 

•  "These  lines  were  your  confession.  There  was  a  great  secret  purpose 
which  you  were  cherishing.  You  worked  for  that.  You  saved  for  that. 
For  that  you  had  the  secret  joy  of  living  sparely,  austerely  as  a  soldier. 
"Sir,  you  have  no  son.  But  the  scholars  who  work  upon  the  foun- 
dation which  you  have  established  here  shall  be  your  sons.  Far  down 
the  years  when  all  of  us  are  in  the  dust  your  virile  sons  shall  be  here 
keeping  alive  your  name  and  your  hope.  And  so  shall  be  fulfilled  your 
saying  that 

They  live  longest  in  the  future  who 
Have  truest  kept  the  purposes  of  life." 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


New  Methods  of  Measuring  the  Speed  of  Sound  Pulses 
Near  the  Source. 


By  Arthur  L.  Foley,  Waterman  Research  Professor  and  Head  of 
Department  of  Physics,  Indiana  University. 


In  the  Proceedings  of  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Science  for  1915  the 
writer  showed  that  the  relative  speeds  of  sound  pulses  at  some  distance 
from  the  source  and  of  different  intensity  are  apparently  the  same.  The 
experiments  described  threw  no  light  on  the  question  of  the  actual  speed 
of  a  pulse  at  different  distances  from  the  source.  This  paper  deals  with 
a  method,  rather  with  two  methods,  of  finding  the  actual  and  instanta- 
neous speed  of  the  pulse  at  any  point  less  than  a  meter  or  so  from  the 
source.  The  method  could  be  used  for  greater  distances  by  increasing 
the  intensity  of  the  spark  producing  the  sound  pulse,  so  as  to  give  the 
wave  sufficient  intensity  to  cast  a  "shadow"  on  a  plate  or  film. 


.^^ 


FIG.;. 

Figure  1  shows  the  arrangement  of  the  apparatus  used  in  this  experi- 
ment. M  is  a  plane  steel  mirror  made  by  grinding  and  polishing  the 
flat   surface   foi-med   by   cutting  an   axial   longitudinal   section   20    cm. 

(221) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


222        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

long  from  a  piece  of  steel  shafting  about  5  cm.  in  diameter.  The 
shaft  was  arranged  for  rotation  at  a  high  speed  inside  a  light-tight 
box  Y  connecting  with  another  light-tight  box  X,  with  a  rectang^ular 
opening  O,  2x15  cm.  between  them.  Bi  and  Ba  are  boxes  to  hold 
the  full  and  empty  spools  for  photographic  film.  Guides  F  on  each 
edge  of  the  film  caused  it  to  lie,  when  unwound,  on  the  surface  of 
a  cylinder  with  the  rotating  mirror  M  on  the  axis.  Just  in  front  of  the 
mirror  is  a  horizontal  rod  R,  of  small  diameter.  A  spark  from  the 
terminals  E  of  an  electric  machine  jumps  the  gaps  Gi,  Cra,  S  and  L,  the 
spark  at  S  occurring  before  the  one  at  L.  When  the  sound  spark  occurs 
the  light  passes  through  O,  falls  upon  the  mirror  M,  and  is  reflected  on 
the  film,  the  rod  R  producing  a  shadow  Ri  on  the  film.  Suppose  that 
the  sound  pulse  arrives  at  W,  by  the  time  the  retarded  light  spark 
occurs.  A  part  of  the  shadow  of  Wi  is  intercepted  by  the  wall  of  the 
box.  A  part  passes  through  O,  falls  upon  the  mirror  at  Ws,  Ws,  and  is 
reflected  on  the  film  at  W„  W»,  together  with  a  second  shadow  of  the 
rod  R,  now  at  Ra,  due  to  the  fact  that  the  mirror  has  rotated  through 
a  measurable  angle  during  the  interval  between  the  sound  spark  and  the 
light  spark.  The  distance  between  the  shadows  Ri  and  Rj  together  with 
the  mirror  speed  and  the  distance  from  the  mirror  to  the  film,  enable 
one  to  calculate  the  time  interval  between  the  sparks. 

From  the  measured  distance  W, — W«,  together  with  the  distance  from 
the  light  spark  to  the  sound  spark,  and  from  the  sound  spark  to  the 
mirror,  and  thence  to  the  film,  one  gets  the  true  radius  of  the  sound 
wave.  The  quotient  of  the  radius  by  the  time  gives  the  average  speed. 
If  one  plots  radius  by  time  for  a  considerable  number  of  observations 
the  tangent  at  any  point  on  the  curve  gives  the  instantaneous  speed  at 
that  point. 

The  films  used  were  eight  inches  wide  and  four  feet  long,  and  in- 
cluded about  sixty  degrees  of  the  arc  about  the  mirror.  As  the  image 
rotates  twice  as  fast  as  the  mirror  it  is  evident  that  if  the  sparks  were 
produced  at  random,  there  would  be  but  one  chance  in  twelve  of  the 
mirror  being  in  the  proper  position  to  give  a  picture.  To  avoid  this 
difficulty  and  to  enable  one  to  get  several  pictures  on  the  same  film  a 
metal  rod  was  fastened  in  such  a  position  on  the  end  of  the  mirror  shaft 
that  it  shortened  the  gap  Ga  to  such  an  amount  as  to  cause  a  spark  to 
pass  at  the  proper  time.  The  position  of  the  gap  G2  was  varied  by  fixing 
the  electrode  J  at  different  points  along  the  arc  A.  J  was  arranged  so 
it  could  be  slid  back  and  forth  through  a  sleeve.  When  a  spark  was 
desired  J  was  pushed  forward  and  the  gap  Ga  thus  shortened  until  a 
spark  occurred.  The  gap  was  then  lengthened  before  the  electric  ma- 
chine had  time  to  generate  a  sufficient  potential  for  a  second  spark.  In 
practice,  however,  this  device  was  found  to  be  somewhat  erratic,  prob- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


New  Methods  of  Measuring.  223 

ably  due  to  the  powerful  air  currents  set  up  by  the  whirling  electrode. 
Nevertheless  it  was  possible  to  get  three  or  four  pictures  on  each  film 
and  to  get  sufficiently  well  defined  sound  pulse  and  rod  shadows  to  permit 
of  reliable  speed  calculations  for  waves  of  radius  greater  than  2  or  3  cm. 
The  polish  of  the  metal  mirror  was  not  sufficiently  good  to  give  well- 
defined  wave  pictures  close  to  the  source,  where  the  wave  is  more  or  less 
confused  with  other  spark  effects.  It  was  decided,  therefore,  to  eliminate 
the  mirror  entirely  and  get  the  picture  directly  on  a  moving  film.  The 
mirror  shaft  was  removed  and  in  its  stead  was  placed  a  shaft  carrying 
an  eight-inch  fiat-face  steel  pulley  two  feet  in  diameter.  The  film  was 
fastened  to  the  face  of  the  pulley  and  rotated  within  1  cm.  of  the  open- 
ing O,  across  the  center  of  which  the  rod  R  was  fastened  in  a  horizontal 
position  and  exactly  in  line  with  the  sound  and  light  sparks.  The  dis- 
tance on  the  film  between  the  sound  spark  and  the  light  spark  shadows 
of  R  together  with  the  pulley  speed  gave  the  time  interval  between  the 
sparks.  From  the  radius  of  the  wave  shadow  together  with  the  dis- 
tances from  the  light  and  sound  sparks  to  the  film  the  true  radius  of 
the  sound  pulse  was  calculated.  As  before,  the  quotient  of  radius  by 
time  gave  the  sound  speed. 

The  definition  of  both  sound  wave  and  rod  shadows  was  much  better 
in  this  case  than  when  the  rotating  steel  mirror  was  used.  However, 
the  experiment  did  not  yield  better  results  for  waves  of  small  radius, 
because  it  was  impossible  to  rotate  the  film  fast  enough  to  make  the 
distance  between  the  rod  shadows  sufficiently  large  to  be  measured  with 
accuracy,  when  the  time  interval  was  small.  The  film  was  thrown  off 
and  torn  to  fragments  whenever  the  speed  exceeded  some  twenty-five 
revolutions  per  second,  regardless  of  the  precautions  taken  to  hold  the 
film  on  the  pulley.  Even  when  both  the  edges  and  the  ends  of  the  film 
were  cemented  to  the  pulley,  the  film  was  thrown  off  at  a  speed  of  some 
twenty  turns  per  second.  The  highest  rotational  speed  was  obtained 
when  the  film  was  held  on  the  pulley  by  placing  over  it  a  strip  of  strong 
cotton  net  of  about  5  cm.  mesh,  with  edges  laced  securely  on  the  inside 
of  the  pulley  rim.  The  string  shadows  were  readily  differentiated  from 
the  rod  and  wave  shadows,  and  were  not  so  objectionable  as  the  writer 
feared  they  might  be. 

On  account  of  the  limited  speed  at  which  the  film  could  be  rotated, 
the  increase  in  the  accuracy  of  the  time  interval  measurements  resulting 
from  the  better  definition  of  the  rod  shadows  was  offset  by  the  fact  that 
the  distance  between  the  shadows  was  much  less  than  by  the  rotating 
mirror  method.  Both  the  rotating  mirror  method  and  the  moving  film 
method  gave  results  that  show  that  if  there  is  any  difference  between 
the  speed  of  a  sound  pulse  of  the  intensity  us'ed  and  the  speed  of  an 
ordinary  sound  wave,  the  difference  is  less  than  two  per  cent. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


224        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

The  writer  is  now  at  work  on  a  third  method  which  promises  more 
accurate  results  than  either  of  the  ones  described  in  this  paper. 

It  may  be  noted  that  a  photographic  method  of  measuring  sound 
speed  eliminates  sources  of  error  found  in  all  methods  where  the  sense 
of  hearing  or  any  mechanical  device  is  used  to  register  the  time  of 
arrival  of  a  sound  wave,  and  where  the  distances  traversed  by  the  wave 
are  large.  There  is  no  question  as  to  personal  error,  time  lag,  wind 
velocities,  differences  in  temperature,  humidity,  density,  change  of  wave 
form,  etc.  The  method  gives  the  instantaneous  speed  at  points  up  to  the 
source  of  sound  itself.  These  points  will  be  discussed  and  data  submitted 
in  a  later  paper. 

The  writer  wishes  to  thank  Professor  Cogshall  of  the  Department  of 
Astronomy,  of  Indiana  University,  for  his  kindness  in  grinding  and 
polishing  the  steel  mirror  used  in  this  experiment. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Crustaceans  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee. 


By  Barton  Warren  Evermann, 
Director  of  the  Museum  of  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences, 

and 

Howard  Walton  Clark, 

Scientific  Assistant,  U.  S.  Bureau  of  Fisheries  Biological  Station, 

Fairport,  Iowa. 


During  the  physical  and  biological  survey  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee, 
Indiana,  carried  on  more  or  less  intermittently  from  July,  1899,  to 
October,  1913,  for  the  United  States  Bureau  of  Fisheries,  considerable 
attention  was  given  to  the  Crustaceans  inhabiting  the  lake  and  its  con- 
necting waters.  The  full  detailed  report  on  those  investigations  will, 
it  is  hoped,  be  published  elsewhere.  In  the  present  paper  it  is  our  pur- 
pose to  present  only  the  more  important  considerations  and  conclusions, 
largely  omitting  the  vast  body  of  details  and  observed  facts  upon  which 
the  present  contribution  is  based. 

A  very  comprehensive  study  of  the  Plankton  was  made  by  Professor 
Chancey  Judah,  now  of  the  University  of  Wisconsin.  It  is  hoped  the 
results  of  Professor  Juday's  studies  may  be  published  soon.  A  similar 
thorough  study  of  the  Parasitic  Copepods  was  made  by  Dr.  Charles  B. 
Wilson,  a  brief  summary  of  whose  report  is  made  part  of  this  paper. 

Except  during  the  summer  of  1899  and  1900,  the  field  work  on  Lake 
Maxinkuckee  was  nearly  all  done  by  one  or  two  investigators  only. 
This  made  it  impossible  to  pay  equal  attention  to  all  the  groups  of 
animals  and  plants;  indeed,  many  groups  could  receive  scarcely  more 
than  passing  notice,  while  others  had  to  be  wholly  neglected.  Among 
those  groups  which  received  but  slight  attention  are  the  worms,  poly- 
zoans,  protozoans,  smaller  crustaceans,  insects,  and  the  like.  Although 
considerable  collections  were  made  in  some  of  these  groups,  insurmount- 
able difficulty  was  experienced  in  finding  specialists  to  work  them  up. 
Our  reports  on  several  of  those  groups  are  therefore  necessarily  brief 
and  general  in  character. 

Occasional  notes  and  memoranda  were  made  regarding  various  spe- 
cies which  we  did  not  have  opportunity  to  observe  regularly  or  method- 
ically. Such  of  these  as  seem  to  possess  some  value  or  interest  are  given 
in  the  following  pages. 

^  Published  by  permission  of  the  U.  S.  Commissioner  of  Fish  and  Fisheries. 
16—16668  (225) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


226        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Collecting  Stations. 

Lake  Maxinkuckee  is  in  Marshall  County,  Indiana,  34  miles  south  of 
South  Bend,  94  miles  southeast  of  Chicago,  and  32  miles  north  of  Lo- 
gansport.  Its  elevation  above  sea-level  is  735  feet.  It  is  about  2.6  miles 
long  from  north  to  south,  about  1.6  miles  wide,  and  its  surface  area  is 
1,854  acres.     Its  greatest  depth  is  about  90  feet. 

Observations  were  made  and  collections  obtained  in  all  sorts  of  places 
and  situations  in  and  about  the  lake.  Certain  localities  mentioned  spe- 
cifically in  this  series  of  papers  may  be  more  definitely  described  as 
follows : 

Arlington, — A  flag  station  on  the  west  side  of  the  lake,  at  the  base 
of  Long  Point. 

Aubeenaubee  Creek, — A  small  stream  entering  the  lake  near  the 
middle  of  the  east  side. 

Birch  Swamp, — About  two  miles  west  of  the  lake. 

Bruce  Lake, — A  small  lake  a  few  miles  southwest  of  Lake  Max- 
inkuckee. 

Culver  Inlet, — A  small  stream  entering  the  lake  at  the  northeast 
comer. 

Drained  Lake, — An  old  lake  bed  a  mile  northwest  of  the  lake. 

Farrar*s  Creek, — A  small  creek  entering  the  lake  at  the  south- 
west end. 

Green*8  Marsh, — A  few  acres  of  wet  ground  between  Long  Point  and 
the  railroad  on  the  west  side  of  the  lake. 

Long  Point, — A  small  peninsula  projecting  into  the  lake  on  the 
west  side. 

Lo8t  Lake, — A  small,  shallow,  muck-bottomed  lake  lying  west  a  few 
rods  from  Lake  Maxinkuckee. 

N orris  Boathouse, — On  the  southeast  shore  of  the  lake. 

N orris  Inlet, — The  principal  inlet  of  the  lake,  entering  the  lake  at 
the  southeast  corner. 

Outlet  Bay, — A  small  bay  on  the  north  side  of  Long  Point. 

Outlet, — The  small  stream  through  which  the  water  flows  from  Lake 
Maxinkuckee  into  Lost  Lake. 

Spangler  Creek. — A  small  brook  entering  the  lake  from  the  east. 

Walley's, — A  farm  on  the  outlet  creek  just  below  Lost  Lake. 

Weedpatch. — An  east-and-west  bar  about  1,200  feet  long  and  500 
feet  wide,  in  Lake  Maxinkuckee,  in  lO-foot  water  southeast  of  Arlington. 

Winfield*8, — On  west  side  north  of  Outlet  Bay. 

For  convenience  of  treatment,  the  Crustaceans  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee 
may  be  divided  into  five  groups,  as  follows:    (1)  the  Plankton  species; 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Crustaceans  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee.  227 

(2)  the  Parasitic  Copepods;  (3)  the  Amphipods  or  Beach  Fleas;  (4)  the 
Isopods  or  Sowbugs;  and  (5)  the  Crawfishes. 

The  Plankton  Species. 

The  list  of  species  contained  in  the  Plankton  collections  of  1899  and 
1900,  and  a  discussion  of  their  abundance,  distribution  and  habits,  will 
be  found  in  Professor  Juday's  report.  A  few  additional  species  were 
later  obtained  in  the  small  ponds  about  the  lake. 

Of  the  individual  species  not  much  can  be  said;  our  studies  were  too 
general  for  that  purpose.  It  may  be  stated,  however,  that  plankton 
species  of  crustaceans  constitute  a  large  part,  probably  nearly  all,  of 
the  first  food  of  the  young  of  many  fishes,  and  much  of  the  food  of 
some  species  of  fishes  throughout  their  entire  lives.  The  little  Stickle- 
back (Eucalia  inconstans)  ^  for  example,  may  be  mentioned  as  one  of 
such  species.  Examples  of  this  species  kept  in  an  aquarium  fed  eagerly 
on  any  and  all  plankton  crustaceans  which  we  placed  in  the  aquarium 
with  them.  We  observed  also  that  these  small  crustaceans  are  captured 
and  eaten  -freely  by  those  curious  carnivorous  plants,  the  bladderworts. 

Of  the  whole  group  it  can  be  said  that  they  are  present  throughout 
the  year  in  greater  or  less  abundance.  The  abundance  varies  greatly, 
however,  from  time  to  time,  as  shown  by  Juday.  On  September  6, 
1906,  peculiar  ripples  were  observed  on  the  surface  of  the  otherwise 
smooth  lake.  Upon  cautiously  approaching  the  spot  it  was  found  that 
the  disturbance  was  caused  by  large  schools  of  young  black  bass,  circling 
about  and  feeding  voraciously.  Upon  drawing  a  towing-net  through  the 
place  great  quantities  of  several  species  of  plankton  crustaceans  were 
obtained. 

On  many  occasions  the  lake  surface  in  large  areas  was  seen  to  be 
covered  with  a  thin  scum  which,  on  examination,  was  found  to  consist 
chiefly  of  the  cast-off  skins  of  minute  crustaceans.    \ 

On  November  5,  1906,  Entomostraca  were  present  in  such  remark- 
able abundance  at  and  near  the  surface  of  the  lake  that  the  water  had 
the  appearance  and  consistency  of  thick  soup,  the  little  animals  actually 
crowding  each  other  in  the  water.  The  next  day  great  windrows  of  these 
crustaceans  were  found  washed  up  on  the  shore  at  Long  Point.  Two 
days  later  they  were  again  observed  forming  dense  clouds  at  and  near 
the  surface  of  the  lake  off  the  Norris  boathouse.  A  4-drachm  vial  was 
simply  dipped  into  the  water  and  about  100  of  the  creatures  were 
secured. 

A  quantity  of  plankton  collected  July  7,  1909,  and  examined  quali- 
tatively by  Professor  A.  A.  Doolittle  of  the  department  of  biology, 
Washington,  D.  C,  high  schools,  gave  the  following  results : 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


228        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

species.  Per  cent. 

Diaptomus  oregonensis  Lilljeborg 0.38 

Cyclops  leuckarti;  (edax  Forbes) 4 .  11 

Diaphanosoma  leuchtenbergianum  Fischer 0.40 

Daphnia  retrocurva  Forbes,  var 1 .06 

Daphnia  hycUina  Leydig 84 .02 

Total 99.97 

The  Copepods  (free-swimming  species)  frequently  bear  attached 
Protozoa,  sometimes  in  such  numbers  as  to  make  them  appear  bristly. 
They  seem  to  be  more  abundant  in  winter  when  the  lake  is  covered  with 
ice.  Whenever  holes  are  cut  through  the  ice  these  crustaceans  often 
come  crowding  to  the  light  and  air. 

The  Cladocera  are^  generally  speaking,  the  larger  and  more  showy 
element  of  the  crustacean  plankton.  Their  stomach  contents,  which  at 
times  forms  conspicuous  masses,  was  found  to  be  composed  largely  of 
phyto-plankton  elements,  especially  Botryococcus  brauni,  which,  because 
of  its  color,  was  easily  recognizable.  One  of  the  smaller  Cladocera, 
Chydorus,  was  found  to  constitute  an  important  part  of  the  food  of  the 
Unionidse  or  mussels  of  the  lake,  as  it  also  does  of  the  small  fishes. 

One  of  the  most  notable  species  of  the  Zoo-plankton  was  LepUuiora 
hyalina.  This  is  usually  a  deep-water  species,  but  on  September  2, 
1906,  it  was  taiken  in  quantities  in  a  surface  tow-net  in  Outlet  Bay. 
Though  one  of  the  largest  of  the  plankton  crustaceans,  this  species  was 
so  transparent  as  to  be  quite  invisible  except  by  its  movements  among 
the  associated  individuals  of  Lyngbya, 

Two  other  species  of  Entomostraca  not  usually  classed  as  plankton 
were  noted,  namely,  the  fairy  shrimps.  One,  BrancMppus  serratus,  was 
found  dead  in  large  numbers  floating  on  the  surface  in  deep  water  July 
11,  1899.  Later  ir^  the  same  day  considerable  numbers  were  seined  in 
shallow  water  off  Norris  Inlet.  Again,  on  August  21  and  31,  a  few 
were  seen  floating. 

Another  species,  BrancMppus  vemalis,  was  found  abundantly  in 
small  temporary  ponds  west  and  south  of  the  lake  in  the  spring  of 
1901.  A  school  of  these  curious  crustaceans  of  delicate  structure  and 
pearly  appearance,  apparently  usually  swimming  on  their  backs,  their 
numerous  gill-feet  moving  rapidly  in  the  water,  makes  a  very  pretty 
sight. 

The  Parasitic  Copepods  are  reported  on  by  Dr.  Wilson.  It  may 
be  here  remarked  that,  as  compared  with  other  bodies  of  water, 
these  forms  are  comparatively  rare  in  Lake  Maxinkuckee.  In  certain 
rivers  which  we  have  examined,  particularly  the  Kankakee,  Maumee, 
and  sloughs  along  the  Mississippi,  certain  large  species  of  Lemasocera 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Crustaceans  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee.  229 

are  so  abundant  during  the  summer  and  fall  that  they  infest  most  of 
the  rock  bass,  crappies,  and  bluegills.  They  seemed  to  be  worst  on  the 
rock  bass,  nearly  every  one  of  which  was  bleeding  in  one  or  more  places 
where  these  parasites  had  fastened  in  their  skin.  At  this  season  these 
fishes  are  said  to  be  "wormy"  and  are  rejected  by  anglers  and  others 
who  chance  to  catch  them. 

The  Isopods  or  Sowbugs  are  represented  at  the  lake  by  two  aquatic 
species,  one  in  the  lake  proper,  the  other  (Porcellio  scaber)  in  the  wood- 
land ponds  and  in  damp  places.  The  lake  species  is  abundant  all  the 
year  round  among  the  Chara,  especially  in  Outlet  Bay.  It  is  one  of  the 
most  important  fish  foods,  particularly  of  rock  bass  and  bluegills.  It 
sometimes  forms  the  greater  part  of  the  food  of  those  species.  Little 
or  nothing  was  learned  of  the  habits  of  the  pond  species.  There  are, 
of  course,  several  land  species  of  these  curious  ^crustaceans. 

The  Amphipods  are  represented  by  several  species  in  the  lake  and 
the  neighboring  ponds.  •  A  large  species  (probably  Gamrtvarus  pulex) 
was  found  near  the  shore,  and  a  smaller  form  (probably  Hyalella  knick- 
erbockeri)  farther  out  in  the  lake  among  the  aquatic  plants.  The  Horse- 
tail (Ceratophyllum  demersum)  was  one  of  its  favorite  haunts.  Some 
of  our  herbarium  specimens  of  this  plant  were  found  full  of  these  beach 
fleas.  Many  specimens  were  obtained  from  the  plants  raked  up  from 
various  depths.  The  Amphipods  could  be  obtained  by  washing  the  plants 
in  a  tub  or  bucket  of  water.  A  few  were  taken  at  night  in  the  towing- 
net.  Some  were  found  in  stomachs  of  fishes  seined  August  3,  1906, 
south  of  Arlington  station. 

The  freshwater  shrimp  (Palsemonetes  exilipes)  was  not  common  in 
or  about  the  lake.  Only  a  few  were  obtained,  one  on  August  2,  1899, 
one  on  September  6,  1899,  and  one  on  October  23,  1900,  all  in  the  Outlet. 
Two  were  secured  in  Lost  Lake,  one  on  August  1,  the  other  September  1, 
1900.  Another  was  taken  November  27,  1900,  upon  a  mass  of  aquatic 
plants  dredged  some  distance  from  shore  in  the  lake.  This  species  there- 
fore appears  to  be  rather  rare  at  this  lake.  In  Little  River  near  Aboite, 
Allen  County,  Indiana,  immense  numbers  of  this  shrimp  were  found  in 
masses  of  Ceratophyllum,  from  which  the  transparent  creatures  jumped 
with  great  alacrity  when  hauled  up  out  of  the  water.  They  were  found 
in  great  abundance  also  in  Chester  River  near  Chester,  Md, 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


230        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 
The  Copepod  Parasites. 


By  Charles  B.  Wilson,  Professor  of  Biology,  State  Normal  School, 
Westfield,  Mass. 


Three  species  of  Argulu^,  two  of  Erg  ostitis,  and  one  of  Achtheres 
were  found  upon  the  fish  of  the  lake.  The  species  of  Argulus  have  all 
been  described  elsewhere  (Proc.  U.  S.  Nat  Mus.,  XXV,  pp.  709,  715, 
718).  The  life  history  of  one  species.  A,  maculosus,  was  obtained  in 
full,  and  a  brief  account  was  published  in  1907  (Proc.  U.  S".  Nat.  Mus., 
XXXII,  p.  416).  Of  the  two  species  of  ErgasiltLS,  one  (E,  centrarchi- 
darum)  has  been  described  by  Wright.*  This  species  is  common  every- 
where on  all  fishes  of  the  perch  family.  The  other  species  was  new  to 
science;  it  was  named  E.  versicolor,  and  a  full  description  with  figures 
was  published  in  1911  (Proc.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.,  XXXIX,  p.  341:  pi.  45). 

The  single  species  of  Achtheres,  A,  percarum,  has  also  been  described 
by  Wright,  Nordmann,  Kroyer  and  others,  but  several  details  were  here 
supplied  that  had  hitherto  been  lacking. 

The  complete  life-history  was  also  worked  out  for  both  genera;  that 
of  Achtheres  had  been  partially  described  before  by  Claus  and  Kellicott, 
while  not  a  single  detail  had  ever  been  published  for  Ergasilus, 

1.  Argulus  catostomi  Dana  &  Herrick. 

Found  in  the  gill-cavity  of  the  white  sucker,  Catostomus  commersonu 
The  discovery  of  this  species  in  Indiana,  together  with  those  recorded 
from  Lake  Champlain  and  the  rivers  of  Massachusetts,  Connecticut  and 
New  York,  shows  the  distribution  of  this  parasite  to  be  identical  with 
that  of  the  host  it  infests.  The  specimens  here  obtained  and  those  from 
Lake  Champlain  include  males,  the  first  of  that  sex  to  be  recorded  for 
this  species. 

2.  Argulus  americanus  Wilson. 

Found  on  the  outside  surface  of  the  Dogfish  or  Bowfin  (Amia  calva). 
This  species  does  not  appear  to  be  very  common  at  Lake  Maxinkuckee, 
but  possibly  an  examination  of  a  larger  number  of  fish  would  show  a 
different  result.  This  is  the  first  instance  of  the  species  having  been 
obtained  from  fish  in  their  native  haunts. 

3.  Argulus  mdculosus  Wilson. 

Found  on  the  outside  surface  of  the  Common  Bullhead  {Ameiurus 
nebulosus),  the  Yellow  Catfish  (Ameiurus  natcUis),  and  the  Rock  Bass 
or  Redeye  (Ambloplites  rupestris).  Only  two  females  were  found  on 
the  Redeye;  both  were  full  of  ripe  eggs;  evidently  they  were  hunting 


«  Proc.  Canadian  Institute  (N.  S.).  U  P.  248. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Copepod  Parasites.  231 

for  a  suitable  place  to  deposit  them,  and  were  only  using  the  Redeye 
as  a  temporary  host. 

The  Yellow  Cat  is  the  true  host  of  this  Argulus,  and  nearly  half  the 
fish  of  that  species  that  were  examined  yielded  specimens  of  this  parasite. 

4.  ErgcLsilxis  centrarchidarum  Wright. 

Found  on  the  gill-filaments  of  the  Calico  Bass  (PoTtioxis  sparoides), 
the  Redeye  (Ambloplites  rupestris),  the  Warmouth  {Chsenohryttus 
gtdosus),  the  Bluegill  (Lepomis  pallidiLs),  the  Small-mouthed  Black 
Bass  (Micropterus  dolomdeu),  the  Large-mouthed  Black  Bass  (M. 
salmaides),  the  Yellow  Perch  (Perca  flavescens),  and  the  Walleyed  Pike 
(Stizostedion  vitreum),  and  would  have  been  found  almost  certainly 
upon  the  different  sunfishes  had  there  been  an  opportunity  to  examine 
them. 

As  its  name  rightly  implies,  it  is  a  family  rather  than  a  specific 
parasite,  and  is  very  widely  distributed,  as  are  the  hosts  upon  which 
it  lives. 

5.  Ergasilus  versicolor  Wilson. 

Found  only  on  the  two  species  of  Catfish  (Ameiurus  nehuXosus  and 
A,  natalis),  the  latter  of  which  was  the  more  badly  infested.  This 
species  was  not  found  upon  any  other  fish  in  the  lake,  although  many 
hundreds  of  them  were  searched  for  it,  nor  was  Ergisiltis  centrarchi- 
darum so  common  on  the  other  fish,  ever  found  on  these  catfish. 

E,  versicolor  has  since  been  obtained  from  the  Channel  Cat  (Ictalurus 
punctatus),  and  the  Eel  Cat  (Ictalurus  anguilla),  in  the  Mississippi 
River. 

The  species  is  thus  distinctively  a  Catfish  parasite  in  sharp  contrast 
to  E.  centrarchidarum,  which  is  a  Perch  parasite. 

The  life  history  of  ErgaMlu^  worked  out  upon  these  two  Maxinkuckee 
species  was  published  in  Vol.  39,  Proc.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mus.,  pp.  313-326, 
and  still  stands  as  the  only  contribution  to  the  ontogeny  of  the  entire 
family. 

6.  Achtheres  ambloplitis  Kellicott. 

Found  on  the  gill  arches  of  the  Redeye  (Ambloplites  rupestris) ,  the 
Bluegill  (Lepomis  pallidus),  the  Small-mouthed  Black  Bass  (Microp^ 
terus  dolomieu),  the  Large-mouthed  Black  Bass  (M,  salmoides),  and 
the  Walleyed  Pike  (Stizostedion  vitreum).  It  was  particularly  common 
on  the  Redeye  and  the  Small-mouthed  Bass,  two-thirds  of  the  specimens 
examined  being  infested  with  this  parasite.  Like  the  first  species  of 
Ergasilus  mentioned  above,  it  is  a  family  rather  than  a  specific  parasite, 
as  its  name  implies.  But  it  is  even  more  widely  distributed;  for  it  is 
as  common  on  the  European  as  on  the  American  Perch,  and  is  probably 
as  widely  distributed  as  the  Perch  family  itself. 

The  life  history  of  this  species  appeared  in  Vol.  39,  Proc.  U.  S.  Nat. 
Mus.,  pp.  194-224:  pis.  29-36. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


232        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 
The  Crawfishes. 


By  William  Perry  Hay,  Head  of  the  Department  of  Biology  and 
Chemistry,  Washington,  D.  C,  High  Schools. 


Crawfishes  are  quite  common  in  Lake  Maxinkuckee  and  in  Lost  Lake; 
on  the  land  about  the  lakes  they  are  less  frequent.  The  truly  aquatic 
species  are  found  chiefiy  in  the  shallower  depths,  hiding  under  rocks, 
sticks,  and  among  Chara  and  other  aquatic  vegetation.  But  even  at 
their  best,  not  as  many  will  be  taken  in  the  seine  as  will  be  secured  in 
similar  collecting  in  sluggish  streams.  The  g^reatest  number  taken  in 
one  haul  of  the  seine  in  Lake  Maxinkuckee  was  twenty-two. 

In  the  collections  turned  over  to  me  for  identification  and  study, 
four  species  are  represented,  namely:  Cambarus  blandingi  acutus,  C. 
diogenes,  C.  propinquus,  and  C  immunis  spinirostris ;  or,  using  English 
names  instead  of  Latin  combinations,  we  may  designate  these  four  spe- 
cies as  the  Pond  Crawfish,  the  Solitary  Crawfish,  the  Gray  Rock  Craw- 
fish, and  the  Rock  Crawfish.  Of  these,  the  first  three  have  long  been 
known  to  occur  in  northern  Indiana,  but  C.  immunis  spinirostris  has 
not  heretofore  been  known  north  of  Terre  Haute.  One  or  two  other 
species  probably  occur  in  the  Maxinkuckee  region.  C.  argillicola  Faxon 
has  been  reported  from  several  localities  north,  east  and  south  of  Lake 
Maxinkuckee,  and  C.  nisticus  Hagen  has  been  taken  near  Mount  Etna, 
Huntington  County,  Indiana. 

Beyond  doubt,  the  crawfish  fauna  of  this  lake,  or  of  any  other,  wiD 
repay  careful  study.  The  habits  and  economic  importance  of  these 
animals  are  only  poorly  known;  but  it  must  be  that,  as  a  source  of  food 
supply  for  other  animals,  or  as  scavengers,  they  fill  a  field  of  usefulness. 

As  the  species  of  crawfishes  are  rather  difiicult  to  distinguish,  and 
as  the  present  account  is  for  the  general  public  rather  than  for  the 
zoologist,  it  will  be  impracticable  to  give  more  concerning  the  structural 
characters  of  these  than  is  absolutely  indispensable  for  their  recogni- 
tion. Before  beginning  this,  however,  it  must 'be  stated  that  the  male 
crawfish  may  be  distinguished  from  the  female  by  the  presence  of  two 
pairs  of  rigid  appendages  which  are  attached  to  the  first  two  joints  of 
the  abdomen  or  tail,  and  which,  projecting  nearly  straight  forward,  lie 
in  a  sort  of  groove  between  the  bases  of  the  walking  legs.  In  the  female 
the  abdomen  is  broader  than  in  the  male,  and  the  appendages  of  the 
first  two  joints  are  slender  and  flexible  like  those  which  follow.  The 
rostrum  is  the  beak-like  projection  of  the  shell  (or  carapace)  above 
the  eyes. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Crawfishes.  233 

1.  Camharas  hlandingi  acutus  (Girard).     Pond  Crawfish. 

This  species  may  be  at  once  distinguished  by  the  fact  that  in  the 
males  the  third  and  fourth  pairs  of  walking  legs  bear  a  hook  on  the 
third  joint  from  the  base.  The  rostrum  is  long  and  approximately 
triangular,  with  a  pair  of  small  teeth  quite  close  to  the  tip.  The  large 
pincers  and  the  legs  which  bear  them  are  long,  slender,  and  roughly 
granular. 

This  crawfish  is  represented  in  the  collection  by  two  males  and  seven 
females  from  Aubeenaubee  Creek,  one  male  and  one  female  from  Culver 
Inlet,  eight  males  and  two  females  from  Spangler  Creek,  and  by  two 
males  and  one  young  female  from  Bruce  Lake. 

This  is  the  pond  crawfish  of  the  region,  its  home  being  in  woodland 
ponds.  Individuals  were  seen  from  time  to  time,  but  they  usually 
escaped  under  the  leaves.  Several  dead  ones  were  found  in  ponds. 
Generally  speaking,  it  is  not  a  very  abundant  species  anywhere.  It  is 
occasionally  met  with  in  the  sloughs  of  the  Mississippi. 

2.  Cambarus  diogenes  Girard.    The  Solitary  Crawfish. 

This  crawfish  is  an  inhabitant  of  the  lake  at  certain  times  only.  It 
visits  the  water  early  in  the  spring  for  the  purpose  of  producing  its 
young,  but  during  the  remainder  of  the  year  each  individual  lives  alone 
in  a  burrow  over  which  it  constructs  a  chimney  of  mud  pellets.  This 
habit  is  so  peculiar,  being  shared  by  only  ona  other  Indiana  species, 
that  it  alone  should  be  almost  enough  to  distinguish  the  solitary  craw- 
fish; but  as  some  of  our  readers  may  wish  to  know  what  the  animal  is 
like,  the  following  description  is  given:  The  body  is  high  and  com- 
pressed; the  rostrum  is  short,  thick-edged,  and  without  teeth  near  the 
tip;  the  two  longitudinal,  curved  lines  on  the  back  run  together  through- 
out the  whole  part  of  their  length,  so  that  only  small  triangular  spaces 
are  left  between  them  in  front  and  behind.  The  color  is  usually  quite 
brilliant  for  a  crawfish,  the  claws,  rostrum,  and  the  elevations  on  the 
shell  being  more  or  less  marked  with  crimson  and  yellow. 

Represented  in  our  collections  by  one  large  female  and  seven  young 
from  Aubeenaubee  Creek.    Other  examples  were  noted  in  1901  as  follows : 

March  31,  a  good-sized  female  caught  in  a  pool  at  the  birch  swamp; 
April  1,  one  dead,  in  ditch  east  of  railroad,  in  Green's  marsh;  April  2, 
remains  of  several  seen  in  the  Outlet;  April  3,  remains  of  one  found  in 
Green's  marsh;  April  4,  two  caught,  copulating  east  of  the  railroad,  in 
Green's  marsh,  and  one  caught  in  the  marsh  north  of  Lost  Lake ;  April  9, 
three  living  ones  seen,  two  caught,  and  remains  of  great  numbers  at 
the  drained  lake;  April  11,  one  big  one  caught  at  mouth  of  Farrar's 
Creek,  and  one  at  mouth  of  Aubeenaubee  Creek;  April  15,  several  seen 
in  creek  at  south  end  of  the  lake,  two  caught;  April  17,  a  female  with 
eggs  caught  on  west  side  of  lake;  April  19,  a  large  one  dead  at  water's 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


234        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

edge  just  east  of  the  depot;  May  3,  chimneys  abundant  east  of  Lost 
Lake  outlet;  May  17,  one  caught  at  edge  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee  at  Long 
Point,  with  small  young  attached  to  it.  This  is  a  large,  "meaty"  species 
with  heavy  pincers,  and,  except  where  its  natural  habitat  gives  it  a 
muddy  flavor,  makes  an  excellent  food. 

3.    Cambarus  propinquus  Girard.     The  Gray  Rock  Crawfish. 

This  species  may  be  recognized  at  once  by  the  fact  that  the  upper 
surface  of  the  rostrum  has  a  low  median  longitudinal  ridge.  This  is  too 
low  to  be  visible,  but  may  be  detected  by  passing  the  tip  of  one's  finger 
across  from  side  to  side,  when  the  elevated  portion  may  easily  be  felt. 
The  species  is  usually  an  inhabitant  of  running  water  and  will  probably 
be  found  to  occur  most  abundantly  about  the  inlets  and  outlets  of  the 
lake.  It  is  represented  in  our  collections  by  fifteen  males  and  twenty- 
nine  females  from  Aubeenaubee  Creek,  nine  males  and  five  females  from 
Lake  Maxinkuckee,  seven  males  and  ten  females  from  Culver  Inlet,  one 
male  and  one  female  from  outlet  of  lake,  and  four  males  and  seven 
females  from  East  Inlet. 

This  is  the  common  crawfish  of  the  lake.  It  is  found  in  considerable 
abundance  everywhere  among  rocks  and  in  the  Chara.  The  lake  form 
is  brownish  gray  in  color.  It  is  too  small  to  be  of  much  use  as  human 
food.  This  species  is  also  found  in  Yellow  River,  near  Plymouth,  and 
appears  to  be  the  most  common  species  of  the  region.  They  do  not 
burrow,  but  hide  under  rocks  or  bits  of  boards  or  sticks,  under  which 
they  may  make  small  excavations.  Of  many  notes  taken  the  following 
may  be  given  here: 

April  27,  1901,  several  seen  in  the  bottom,  one  bluish  in  color;  two 
copulating.  June  3,  a  large  shed  carapace  in  Outlet  Bay.  June  7, 
several  caught;  they  hide  under  boards;  one  very  small  one  with  its 
mother.  June  12,  many  caught,  more  seen;  almost  every  blunt-nosed 
minnow's  nest  is  watched  by  one  or  two.  June  13,  a  good  many  at 
minnows'  nests.  June  16,  some  caught  at  minnows'  nests.  June  22, 
still  at  minnows'  nests.  In  1904,  October  19,  a  common  content  of  fish 
stomachs;  fishermen  report  that  they  are  the  best  bait  now;  one 
angler  caught  six  black  bass  with  crawfish  and  one  with  a  minnow. 
October  3,  many  at  the  head  of  the  Outlet,  about  eight  seen  in  a  small 
space;  one  was  eating  at  a  dead  grass  pike;  it  stayed  there  a  good 
while.  October  31,  one  still  eating  in  the  morning  at  the  pike;  very 
little  of  the  pike  eaten.  November  2,  still  eating  at  the  pike.  Novem- 
ber 14,  one  near  shore  east  of  Long  Point  eating  a  minnow.  Novem- 
ber 22,  two  caught  while  copulating.  November  25,  two  caught  copu- 
lating east  of  Long  Point.  January  1,  1905,  three  seen  together,  two 
smallish,  copulating,  and  a  big  one  nearby. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Crawfishes.  235 

From  numerous  observations  of  the  crawfishes  of  the  lake  the  fol- 
lowing conclusion  may  be  drawn: 

There  appears  to  be  no  special  time  for  mating,  and  no  special  breed- 
ing period  was  observed;  nor  again,  any  special  time  for  moulting.  It 
is  probable  that  in  the  fairly  uniform  temperature  of  the  lake  the  lives 
of  the  crawfishes  are  not  so  markedly  divided  into  seasons  as  they  are 
in  the  river  crawfishes.  Generally,  in  rivers  heavily  populated  with 
crawfishes,  one  can  find  immense  numbers  of  moulted  shells  at  certain 
periods — usually  about  the  beginning  of  July — but  in  Lake  Maxinkuckee 
only  occasional  and  scattered  cast-off  skins  can  be  found. 

The  nature  of  the  food  was  not  easily  discovered  by  examination  of 
stomach  contents,  as  the  material  was  too  finely  comminuted.  A  few 
were  seen  eating  dead  fishes  as  mentioned  above.  They  are  usually 
found  in  the  vicinity  of  minnow  nests,  and  probably  devour  fish  eggs 
to  some  extent.  Various  fishes,  especially  walleye  and  bass,  eat  them 
at  times,  and  they  are  one  of  the  principal  foods. of  the  soft-shelled 
turtle.  The  lake  species  are  rarely  used  for  bait,  perhaps  because  of 
the  difficulty  of  obtaining  soft-shells  or  "peelers"  in  the  lake;  river 
crawfishes  are  sometimes  used. 

The  crawfishes  of  the  lake  often  have  protozoa  attached  to  the*  gills, 
but  this  probably  does  not  seriously  inconvenience  them. 

4.    Cambarus  immunis  spinirostris  Faxon.     The  Rock  Crawfish. 

In  general  form  and  appearance  this  species  is  somewhat  like  the 
last,  but  it  lacks  the  longitudinal  ridge  on  the  rostrum.  The  teeth  of 
the  rostrum  are  apt  to  be  very  small  and,  in  the  males,  the  tips  of  the 
first  abdominal  appendages  are  slender,  blade-like,  and  recurved. 

Represented  in  the  collections  by  nine  males  and  eight  females  from 
Aubeenaubee  Creek,  one  male  from  Culver  Inlet,  and  twelve  young 
females  from  Norris  Inlet. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


236        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


Notes  on  Certain  Protozoa  and  Other  Invertebrates  of 
Lake  Maxinkuckee. 


By  Barton  Warren  Evermann, 

Director,  Museum,  California  Academy  of  Sciences, 

and 

Howard  Walton  Clark, 

Scientific  Assistant,  U.  S.  Bureau  of  Fisheries  Biological  Station, 

Fairport,  Iowa. 


The  field  work  upon  which  these  notes  are  based  was  carried  on 
under  the  auspices  of  the  United  States  Bureau  of  Fisheries,  at  irregu- 
lar intervals  between  July,  1899,  and  October,  1913,  in  connection  with 
a  physical  and  biological  survey  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee,  Indiana. 

The  Protozoans  and  Ccelenterates. 

No  special  attention  was  paid  to  the  Protozoa  of  the  lake;  only  those 
forms  were  noted  which  thrust  themselves  upon  the  attention. 

The  protozoan  life  of  the  lake  is  not  conspicuous  except  for  a  few 
forms  which  are  found  in  such  abundance  as  to  attract  attention. 

The  list  of  species  identified  is  a  short  one,  not  because  these  organ- 
isms are  rare  at  the  lake,  but  because  no  one  of  the  party  engaged  in 
the  study  of  the  lake  was  especially  interested  in  or  familiar  with  them. 
An  attempt  was  made  to  collect  and  preserve  all  forms  that  attracted 
the  attention,  but  these  were  naturally  only  a  small  proportion  of  the 
species  present.  Whenever  time  from  our  other  multifarious  and  more 
pressing  duties  permitted,  attempts  were  made  to  collect  these  organ- 
isms, and  at  one  time,  stimulated  by  the  handsome  figures  of  some  of 
the  more  ornate  forms  figured  by  Leidy  and  Kent,  an  especial  attempt 
was  made  to  obtain  some  of  the  more  striking  forms,  but  the  search 
was  rather  fruitless.  It  so  happened  that  the  plankton,  which  should 
have  contained  a  number  of  these  organisms,  was  submitted  to  two 
different  experts,  one  interested  in  Algse,  the  other  in  Crustacea,  with 
the  result  that  such  Protozoa  as  there  were  went  by  default. 

Forms  of  doubtful  affinity,  by  some  placed  among  Algse  and  by  others 
as  animals,  such  as  Peridiniufn,  Ceratium  and  Volvox,  are  included, 
Volvox  especially  exhibiting  characters  which  strongly  suggest  a  position 
in  the  animal  series. 

Following  are  our  notes  upon  the  few  species  identified: 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Certain  Protozoa  and  Other  Invertebrates.  237 

1.  Arcella  vulgaris  Ehrenberg 

Upon  examining  the  stomachs  of  a  number  of  tadpoles  caught  at  the 
edge  of  Aubeenaubee  Bay  in  August  (1906),  a  goodly  number  of  Arcella 
vulgaris  were  obtained.  The  tadpoles  when  caught  were  busy  sucking 
the  surface  of  weeds  and  sticks,  as  is  their  habit,  and  from  these  they 
probably  obtained  the  Protozoa.  It  is  probable  that  Protozoa  form  an 
important  part  of  the  food  of  young  tadpoles.  On  other  occasions  we 
have  seen  them  taking  in  large  numbers  of  Paramoecium. 

Arcella  vulgaris  was  abundant  September  3  (1906),  with  other  mate- 
rial (PararruBcium)  forming  a  scum  over  water  in  a  tumbler  where 
some  duckweeds  were  kept.  It  was  also  present  in  hand-gathered  mate- 
rial obtained  at  the  dam  in  the  Outlet,  October  30,  of  the  same  year. 

2.  C entropy xis  aculeata  Stein 

Taken  occasionally  in  the  summer  and  autumn  of  1906  in  gatherings 
in  shallow  water  near  shore. 

3.  Euglypha  alveolata  Dujardin 

Obtained  in  collections  near  shore,  summer  and  autumn  of  1906. 

4.  Dinobryon  sp. 

Found  occasionally  near  shore  in  Lost  Lake,  but  not  abundant.  In 
the  small  lakes  about  St.  Paul,  Minn.,  where  it  is  very  abundant,  it 
furnishes  an  important  item  in  the  food  of  the  fresh-water  mussels. 

5.  Euglena  virndis  Ehrenberg 

Some  found  in  a  scum  in  pools  in  Green's  marsh.  The  great  amount 
of  vegetation  makes  the  water  almost  as  rich  as  an  infusion.  Obtained 
August  22  (1906).  Euglena  formed  a  bright  green  scum  over  the  small 
pools. 

6.  Volvox  aureus  Ehrenberg 

Not  found  by  us  at  all  in  the  lake,  but  exceedingly  abundant  in 
Farrar's  Pond  and  a  pond  east  of  the  lake,  in  the  spring  of  1901,  large 
swarms  being  seen  there,  a  single  dip  of  a  common  dipper  always  con- 
taining several  examples.  A  large  number  of  examples  obtained  from 
a  small  pond  near  the  lake  April  24  (1901).  Its  favorite  habitat  is  in 
shallow  pools,  easily  warmed  throughout  and  containing  in  the  bottom 
an  abundance  of  dead  leaves  or  similar  fertilizing  matter.  This  species 
was  exceedingly  abundant  in  the  shallow,  well-fertilized  carp  ponds  at 
Washington,  D.  C,  in  the  spring  of  1906. 

7.  Peridinium  tabulatum  (Ehrenberg) 

Taken  rather  less  frequently  in  the  vertical  hauls  than  its  relative, 
Ceratium  macroceras,  and  apparently  not  very  .common.  One  might 
naturally  expect  it  to  be  more  common  near  shore.  It  was  not  noted 
often  in  surface  hauls.  It  is  a  species  of  world-wide  distribution,  and 
probably  is  abundant  where  conditions  are  favorable. 

There   is   very   little  difference  between   the   genera   Ceratium  and 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


238        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Peridinium,  the  horns  or  projections,  which  are  the  distinguishing  char- 
acteristics, occurring  in  all  degrees  of  development. 

8.  Ceratium  macroceras  Schrenk 

Common  in  the  vertical  plankton  hauls,  occurring  in  the  great  ma- 
jority of  hauls,  but  not  common  in  the  surface  towings.  A  similar  form, 
C.  tripos,  was  collected  in  towing  near  shore  at  Eagle  Lake.  The  long 
horns  or  projections  of  this  species  are  developed  perhaps  as  much  to 
give  buoyatice  to  the  form  as  for  protection.  The  Peridinales,  repre- 
sented by  this  and  the  two  preceding  species,  are  claimed  by  both  botan- 
ists and  zoologists. 

9.  Stentor  cmndeus  Ehrenberg 

While  raking  up  weeds  through  a  hole  in  the  ice  at  the  Weedpatdi, 
January  15  (1901),  it  was  noted  that  the  water  dripping  from  the  plants 
turned  the  snow  a  vivid  green.  The  snow  thus  colored  was  taken  home 
and  examined,  and  the  green  color  was  found  to  be  due  to  multitudes  of 
green  stentors.  These  were  kept  in  a  vessel  for  some  time.  On  Janu- 
ary 6  they  began  to  gather  on  sticks,  on  snail  shells,  on  the  sides  of  the 
vessel,  and  on  the  under  surface  of  the  water,  assuming  a  globular  form. 
The  species  was  probably  casruleus. 

On  February  7,  on  looking  through  the  ice  on  Outlet  Bay,  it  seemed 
full  of  a  reddish  fine  material  like  stirred-up  mud.  Examination  re- 
vealed the  presence  of  small  diatoms  and  many  green  stentors. 

10.  Stentor  sp. 

Among  our  notes  mention  is  made  of  another  Stentor,  larger  than 
the  green  one,  brownish  and  with  a  large,  flat  peristomal  disc,  circular, 
with  a  side  cleft,  like  a  water-lily  leaf. 

On  October  14  (1907)  it  was  noted  that  brown  stentors  were  attached 
to  the  under  side  of  lily  pads  in  Hawk's  marsh. 

11.  Vorticella  chlorostigma  Ehrenberg? 

On  June  26  (1901)  white,  fluffy  little  globules,  which  shrank  to 
minute  size  when  touched,  and  which  proved  upon  examination  to  be 
composed  of  colonies  of  Vorticella,  were  found  very  abundant  on  the 
submersed  tips  of  Ceratophyllum  leaves  at  the  Inlet.  Late  in  the  autumn 
of  1904  (October  31,  November  2  and  16),  the  same  objects  were  noted, 
but  in  considerably  longer  and  larger  patches,  on  various  weeds,  such 
as  Myriophyllum,  etc.,  in  the  vicinity  of  Winfield's.  Ag^ain,  in  the 
autumn  of  1906,  they  were  exceedingly  abundant  in  various  weeds, 
especially  dying  leaves  of  Vallisneria,  in  Outlet  Bay.  So  far  as  we 
have  observed,  these  organisms  seem  to  increase  greatly  during  the 
autumn.  Both  white  and  green  colonies  were  found,  alike  in  everything 
except  color,  and  it  is  probable  that  they  were  the  same  species  under 
different  conditions.  The  green  forms  showed  distinctly  against  the 
dead  Vallisneria  leaves,  which  had  faded  to  a  papery  white.    It  may  be 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Certain  Protozoa  and  Other  InveHebrates.  239 

it  was  common  during  the  summer,  but  concealed  by  its  green  sub- 
stratum. June  22  (1906)  it  was  plentiful  on  the  weeds  in  Lost  Lake. 
In  a  note  of  June  26,  concerning  this  species,  occurs  the  remark, 
"This  is  a  larger  sort;  there  are  also  other  smaller  isolated  ones  pres- 
ent." On  July  25,  and  previously,  it  was  common  in  both  lakes  in 
weedy,  stag^nant  places,  forming  a  white  halo  along  stems,  not  in  balls. 
In  addition  to  these  there  are  minute  free  Vorticella-like  organisms 
attached  to  the  parasitic  copepods  on  the  gills  of  fishes,  and  on  August 
28  (1908)  a  number  of  minute  clear  Vorticellas  were  found  on  the  body 
of  a  Cyclops.  A  species  of  Vorticella  was  abundant  July  31  (1906)  on 
Anabxna  in  plankton  scum.  Small  Vorticellas  are  found  in  myriads  on 
objects  in  Hawk's  marsh.  They  can  be  found  there  more  abundantly 
than  anywhere  else  about  the  lake. 

12.  Epistylis  sp. 

A  species  of  Epistylis,  probably  plicatilis  Ehrenberg,  was  observed 
forming  a  dense  growth  on  the  shells  of  a  small  Planorbis,  March  25 
(1901)  near  Chadwick's  pier. 

The  copepods  of  the  same  region  at  that  time  presented  a  very  fuzzy 
appearance,  and  upon  examination  were  found  to  be  thickly  overgrown 
with  the  same  or  a  similar  protozoan. 

13.  Opercularia  irritabilis  Hempel 

Abundant  during  the  summer  and  autumn  of  1906  upon  the  lower 
surface  of  the  shell  (pldstron)  and  also  on  the  skin  of  various  turtles, 
especially  the  painted  and  snapping  turtles,  making  a  close,  short,  brown 
fuzzy  growth.  The  turtles  were  botanic  gardens  above  and  zoological 
gardens  below.  The  organisms  seemed  to  do  them  no  injury,  and  were 
gotten  rid  of  when  the  turtles  shed  their  scutes.  It  sometimes  forms  a 
halo  about  the  heads  of  small  turtles,  in  which  case  it  was  at  first  mis- 
taken for  Saprolegnia.  It  is  usually  the  head  of  the  Musk  Turtle  that 
is  affected.  In  this  case  it  appears  to  do  no  harm,  as  the  turtles  are 
quite  lively. 

Something  very  like  this,  probably  the  same  thing,  was  observed 
abundantly  (August  6,  1907),  on  the  shoulders  of  a  dragonfly  larva. 

14.  Vaginicola  leptosoma  Stokes 

A  species  of  Vaginicola,  perhaps  leptosoma,  was  rather  common 
along  the  shore  of  the  lake  by  Overmyer's  hill,  attached  to  algse,  Octo- 
ber 28  (1906).  There  were  at  least  six  examples  on  one  small  bunch 
of  algse.  The  sheath  was  brownish  and  transparent.  When  jarred,  the 
animal  retracted  into  the  sheath,  usually  doubling  up  somewhat  into  a 
sigmoid  curve. 

15.  Tokophrya  quadripartita  (Claparede  &  Lachmann)   Butschli 
Common,    intermixed   with    Opercularia   irritabilis,    on    the    ventral 

scutes  of  a  Musk  Turtle,  September  12   (1906).     It  was  also  found  to 
some  extent  on  the  back. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


240        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

16.  Ophrydium  sp. 

By  far  the  most  abundant  and  conspicuous  protozoan  in  the  lake  was 
a  species  of  Ophrydium  which  formed  large  blue-green  gelatinous  colo- 
nies about  the  size  of  a  hazelnut,  or  larger.  These  semitransparent 
blue-green  balls  remain  in  about  the  same  condition  the  year  round. 
They  are  found  abundantly  wherever  the  carpet  Chara  grows,  and  are 
usually  attached  to  it  or  to  pebbles ;  or,  quite  frequently,  to  mussel  shells 
either  alive  or  dead.  Clear  colonies,  remarkable  for  their  unusual  trans- 
parency, were  found  on  submerged  pieces  of  tile,  August  and  September 
(1907).  At  certain  times,  as  August  1  (1906),  and  August  1  and 
October  12  (1907),  great  quantities  are  washed  ashore.  The  colonies 
are  sometimes  hollow,  as  were  many  of  those  washed  ashore  August  1 
(1907). 

17.  Hydra  fuaca  L. 

Not  frequently  encountered  in  the  lake.  On  October  31  (1906), 
however,  multitudes  were  found  under  leaves  at  the  water's  edge  on 
the  east  side,  and  on  November  13  more  were  found  in  a  similar  posi- 
tion. November  18  one  was  found  attached  to  floating  Wolffiella  in 
Norris  Inlet. 

The  Worms. 

Our  notes  on  this  group  are  few  and  very  unsatisfactory.  We  give 
here  only  such  of  them  as  seem  to  possess  some  value. 

The  attention  we  were  able  to  give  to  these  forms  was  so  little  that 
we  are  unable  to  say  much  regarding  their  relative  or  actual  abundance, 
their  distribution,  or  their  relation  to  the  biology  of  the  lake. 

Flat-worms  or  Planarians,  small,  soft,  flat  objects,  gray  above,  white 
below,  and  oval  in  outline,  were  common  on  rocks  and  among  weeds  in 
the  lake.  In  certain  material  (Vorticella,  etc.),  obtained  near  Norris 
Inlet,  they  were  quite  common.  They  were  often  abundant  on  Cerato- 
phyllum  also.  They  were  so  soft  that  they  often  pulled  apart  when  at- 
tempts were  made  to  remove  them  from  the  rocks. 

Small  pinkish  parasites  (probably  a  species  of  Distomum),  resem- 
bling minute  leeches,  were  found  quite  common  in  the  stomachs  of  fishes, 
particularly  the  Straw  Bass  (Micropterus  salmoides)  and  the  Skipjack 
(Labidesthes  sicculiis).  Usually  during  the  winter  the  stomachs  of 
these  fishes  contained  little  or  no  food,  but  in  most  cases  from  one  to 
several  of  these  parasites  were  found  in  each. 

Round-worms,  resembling  Asca'ris,  are  frequent  intestinal  parasites 
of  the  snakes  of  this  region,  and  one  small  form  was  found  in  the  intes- 
tine of  a  mussel. 

Tapeworms  were  almost  invariably  present  in  the  several  shrews 
(Blarina  brevicauda)  examined.     They  were  also  common  in  the  yellow 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Certain  Protozoa  and  Other  Invertebrates.  241 

perch  and  walleyed  pike,  and  practically  every  dogfish  (Amia  calva) 
examined  was  heavily  loaded  with  them.  Many  duck  stomachs  exam- 
ined, especially  those  of  the  ruddy  duck,  contained  from  a  few  to  many 
tapeworms. 

Angleworms  or  Fishworms  are  not  abundant  in  this  region.  The 
country  about  the  lake  is  chiefly  sandy,  a  soil  not  favorable  to  angle- 
worms. At  the  edges  of  ditches,  marshes  and  woodland  ponds,  where 
the  soil  is  a  black  loam  with  some  admixture  of  clay  and  decaying  vege- 
tation, a  rather  small  species  of  Lumhricus  is  fairly  abundant.  Fisher- 
men who  know  these  places  are  usually  able  to  secure  all  they  need  for 
bait.  The  farmers  and  farmers'  boys  and  the  boys  of  the  village  are 
the  ones  who  make  most  use  of  fishworms  in  their  angling. 

On  December  7  (1904),  worms  which  resembled  angleworms  were 
observed  in  considerable  numbers  coiled  up  under  a  submerged  water- 
soaked  board  at  Long  Point,  where  they  evidently  were  passing  the 
winter  in  that  condition.  These  worms,  however,  possessed  no  annular 
ring.  In  alcohol  they  display  a  fine  opalescent  iridescence  in  reflected 
light.    One  seemed  to  be  dividing  by  a  constriction  near  the  middle. 

Some  very  small  worms,  resembling  fishworms  in  general  appearance 
when  alive,  were  seen  at  the  mouth  of  a  ditch  April  19  (1901). 

Cotylaspis  insignis  Leidy  is  a  common  parasite  of  the  mussels  of 
Lake  Maxinkuckee  and  Lost  Lake.  To  the  naked  eye  this  parasite  looks 
like  a  minute  yellowish  leech.  Its  position  in  the  mussel  is  close  up  in 
the  axils  of  the  gills.  It  was  found  in  Lampsilis  luteola  and  also  in 
Anodonta  grandis  footiana,  from  one  to  several  being  found  in  nearly 
every  example  of  these  species  examined  August  23  (1906).  It  was 
also  found  in  mussels  taken  on  September  28  following,  in  Little  River 
near  Fort  Wayne. 

The  so-called  Horsehair  Snake  or  worm  (Gordius  sp.)  is  very  abun- 
dant in  and  about  Lake  Maxinkuckee.  According  to  anglers,  many  of 
the  grasshoppers  used  by  them  for  bait  are  infested  with  this  parasite. 
On  Augrust  2  (1906)  large  numbers  were  seen  writhing  about  in  mud 
among  snails  along  the  Outlet  where  it  had  been  suddenly  lowered  by 
a  dam  at  the  railroad  bridge.  We  suspect  that  they  may  be  parasitic 
in  this  snail  also.  They  were  frequently  found  in  fishes,  either  free  in 
the  lower  intestine  or  encysted  and  coiled  up  in  some  of  the  internal 
organs.  The  bluegill  appears  to  be  especially  liable  to  infection  by 
Gordius.  It  may  be  that  the  fish  become  infected  through  the  grass- 
hoppers they  devour.  On  August  6  (1906)  these  worms  were  noted  in 
considerable  numbers  in  shallow  water  on  the  east  side  of  the  lake. 

A  long,  slender,  brownish  worm,  probably  a  species  of  TubifeXy  was 
found  in  considerable  numbers  projecting  up  into  the  shallow  water  from 
the  soft  mud  bottom  of  Lost  Lake.     These  were  first  observed  June  8 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


242        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

(1901),  when  the  bottom  near  the  shore  was  seen  to  be  covered  with 
small  whitish  mounds  about  the  size  of  buckshot,  which  gave  a  peculiar 
mottled  or  dappled  appearance.  When  some  of  this  mud  was  dipped  up 
and  examined  the  small  mounds  were  seen  to  be  small  sand  tubes  in 
which  the  worms  were  and  from  which  they  waved  about  in  graceful 
undulations.  They  were  observed  again  at  the  same  place  on  June  15. 
On  June  18  many  were  seen  in  the  creek  under  the  railroad  bridge,  and 
on  June  25  some  were  noted  at  the  south  end  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee. 
And  finally,  on  November  4  (1904),  numerous  burrows  were  seen  in 
shallow  water  near  shore  in  Lost  Lake. 

Thorn-head  worms  (Acanthocephali)  were  found  to  be  common  in- 
testinal parasites  of  various  fishes  and  turtles.  Among  fishes  the  redeye 
appeared  to  be  most  affected.  The  carnivorous  turtles,  such  as  the  soft- 
shelled  and  the  snapper,  were  especially  subject  to  them,  while  the  herb- 
ivorous species,  particularly  the  painted  turtle,  were  comparatively  free. 

Record  may  here  be  made  of  a  Bryozoan,  Plumatella  polymarpha^ 
possibly  related  to  the  Gephyrean  worms.  Plumatella  potymorpha  is  a 
compound  animal,  many  individuals  budding  off  from  one  another,  as 
in  plants.  The  moss-like  colonies  of  this  species  were  very  conmnon  in 
the  lake  among  the  Chara  and  other  plants.  They  were  noted  in  the 
Chara  near  the  depot  pier,  off  Long  Point,  near  Winfield's,  and  at  the 
south  end  near  the  Farrar  cottage.  Indeed,  it  appears  to  be  distributed 
generally  through  the  lake  wherever  there  are  patches  of  vegetation. 
Among  the  Charas  it  forms  a  brown,  upright,  bushy  growth.  In  the 
Weedpatch  it  was  common  on  the  leaves  of  Potamogeton  amplifolius. 
On  October  23  (1900)  it  was  found  to  be  abundant  on  Ceratophyllum 
in  rather  deep  water.  A  week  later  (October  29)  a  good  deal  was  gotten 
on  Myriophyllum.  Early  in  the  spring  (March  1,  1901),  it  was  seen 
growing  on  Potamogeton  robbinsiiy  and  a  little  later  it  was  found  in 
abundance  in  front  of  Arlington  station.  It  was  often  found  on  Chara 
and  other  aquatic  plants  dredged  at  various  times.  It  was  also  found 
growing  on  tile  piles  September  1   (1906). 

During  the  autumn  of  1900  the  stadioblasts  were  frequent  in  plankton 
scum  along  shore,  often  being  present  in  great  abundance.  They  some- 
what resemble  floating  sand  grains,  but  are  lighter  in  weight,  being 
minute  circular  brown  discs,  uniform  in  shape  and  size.  Under  mag- 
nification they  show  series  of  facets  like  the  compound  eye  of  insects. 

On  October  18  (1900),  one  of  the  buoys  which  had  been  for  some 
time  anchored  out  in  the  lake  was  found  to  be  covered  with  a  flat, 
creeping  growth  of  this  species. 

As  Plumatella  polymorpha  occurs  in  this  lake  it  is  highly  worthy  of 
its  specific  name,  as  it  shows  great  variation  in  form  and  general 
appearance. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Certain  Protozoa  and  Other  Invertebrates.  243 

The  leaves  upon  which  it  grrows  are  often  eaten  by  fishes,  probably 
for  the  sake  of  the  Plumatella.  The  yellow  perch  and  bluegill  are  the 
species  in  whose  stomachs  we  found  it  most  abundantly.  The  stomach 
of  a  bluegill  caught  at  the  Weedpatch  October  26  (1904)  was  full  of 
stadioblasts.  During  the  autumn  of  1904  it  was  noted  as  exceedingly 
abundant. 

So  far  as  we  know,  Plumatella  polymorpha  is  the  only  Bryozoan 
in  this  lake. 

The  Sponges. 

Sponges  are  not  especially  abundant  in  the  lake.  In  some  of  the  not 
far  distant  lakes,  as  Winona  Lake,  they  frequently  form  a  thick  coating 
around  the  submerged  portions  of  bulrushes  growing  out  in  the  water, 
but  at  Lake  Maxinkuckee  this  was  not  observed.  They  are  not  common 
on  the  rocks.  On  September  9  (1906)  some  were  found  forming  a  coat- 
ing on  submerged  rocks  on  the  east  side,  and  some  of  these  were  col- 
lected a  few  days  later.  On  November  5  (1906)  some  flat  ones  found 
on  rocks  on  the  east  side  were  apparently  being  eaten  by  insect  larvae. 
On  September  22  (1907)  Prof.  U.  O.  Cox  of  the  Indiana  State  Normal 
found  some  flat  sponges  covering  a  rock  where  the  lake  enters  the  Outlet 
at  the  wagon  bridge,  and  there  were  more  on  a  rock  farther  down  be- 
tween the  wagon  and  railroad  bridges.  This  completes  the  record  for 
the  flat  sponges. 

A  long,  green,  string-like  form  found  hanging  among  the  weeds  at 
the  lake,  especially  at  the  Weedpatch,  was  much  more  common.  This 
was  observed  quite  frequently  and  often  obtained  when  collecting  aquatic 
plants.  Occasionally  these  long  strings  were  washed  up  near  shore. 
On  October  27  (1900)  these  sponges  were  observed  forming  stadioblasts 
on  the  weeds  in  Lost  Lake. 

Occasionally  the  sponges  form  small,  blue-green,  spherical  masses, 
like  bullets,  around  the  stems  of  Chara.  On  January  22  (1901)  some 
of  these  spherical  sponges  were  observed  on  carpet  chara  about  five  feet 
out  from  the  Arlington  Hotel. 

Sponges  are  quite  common  in  creeks  and  ponds  near  the  lake.  The 
long  form  is  common  in  Twin  Lakes.  There  are  long,  finger-like  forms 
in  Yellow  River,  and  they  were  abundant  in  the  Outlet  about  the  bridge 
below  Walley's. 

The  sponges  were  submitted  for  identification  to  Mr.  Edward  Potts, 
of  Media,  Pa.,  who  in  a  letter  dated  May  24  (1905)  writes  so  interest- 
ingly regarding  the  material  that  we  here  quote  his  letter  in  full: 

Yours  with  package  of  material  was  received  by  first  mail 
yesterday  A.  M. ;  and  having  nothing  important  on  hand,  I  ex- 
amined the  vials  at  once,  with  the  following  results: 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


244        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

First,  I  must  express  my  pleasure  in  finding  that  you  had 
sent  only  Sponges;  that  is,  remembering  that  frequently  even 
workers  in  other  lines  of  science  are  utterly  unfamiliar  with 
these  forms,  and  hence  send  one  gelatinous  and  otherwise  in- 
congruous articles.  I  was  glad  to  learn  that  you  know  a  sponge 
when  you  see  it.  The  only  possible  exception  is  in  your  No.  5, 
which,  as  you  supposed,  is  not  a  sponge  but  only  a  puzzle,  which 
may  perhaps  be  explained  by  considering  the  fibres  to  be  a  form 
of  alga,  or  more  probably,  the  stems  or  stipes  (as  the  "Micro- 
graphic  Dictionary"  calls  them)  of  some,  possibly  all,  those 
Diatoms  now  found  at  the  outer  surface  of  the  sub-spheres.  I 
have  frequently  found  Diatoms  so  growing. 

No.  1  is  Carterius  tubisperma  Mills,  and  is,  I  am  sorry  to 
say,  the  only  sponge  in  satisfactory  condition  for  safe  deter- 
mination. Nos.  2  and  4  are,  I  fully  believe,  of  the  same  species 
as  No.  1,  and  they  have  plenty  of  gemmules  or  statoblasts;  but 
these  are  so  far  from  maturity  that,  if  the  same  species,  the 
chitinous  coat  is  extremely  thin  and  it  apparently  has  not  yet 
developed  the  foraminal  tubules,  the  granular  crust,  and  protec- 
tive birotulate  spicules  which  should  be  the  determining  points. 
I  do  not  understand  why  this  should  be  so  with  the  date  given 
(November  15  and  later) ;  but  I  suppose  it  possible  that  cold 
spring  water  or  its  unusual  depth  may  have  retarded  develop- 
ment to  a  date  later  than  that  with  which  I  have  been  familiar. 
This  is  further  suggested  by  No.  3,  in  which  I  have  failed  to 
find  any  gemmules,  and  which  reminds  me  of  the  appearance 
and  condition  of  forms  that  I  have  sometimes  called  perennial 
or  evergreen  sponges,  which  apparently  continue  their  growth  all 
through  the  winter,  at  least  in  deep  water.' 

No.  3  is  clearly  a  different  sponge  from  the  others,  as  shown 
by  its  shorter  and  more  robust  spicules  (skeletal),  which,  as  you 
will  see,  are  covered  with  very  minute  spines.  I  should  have 
been  much  pleased  to  find  the  stadioblasts  of  this  sponge.  The 
skeleton  spicules  suggest  Meyenia  leidyi  Carter,  although  in  that 
species  they  are  rarely  microscopical.  You  may  meet  with  it 
again  under  more  favorable  circumstances.' 

Although  I  fear  they  are  too  soft  for  safe  transportation, 
I  propose  to  pack  with  the  vials  returned,  two  trial  slides.  No.  1, 
showing  Carterius  tubispermaf  in  which  you  may  see  the  for- 
aminal tubules  before  mentioned  and  ■  the  armature  of  radial 
birotulate  spicules,  beside  the  skeleton  and  dermals;  and  No.  2, 
showing  separated  spicules  of  the  same. 


^  See  my  Monograph,  pp.  246  and  246. 
'  See  fig.  1,  plate  X,  of  ^y  Monograph. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Aphids  and  Ants  on  Fruit  Trees. 


S.  D.  Conner,  Purdue  University  Agricultural  Experiment  Station. 


As  an  amateur  horticulturist  I  have  had  quite  a  lot  of  trouble  with 
aphids  on  fruit  trees,  particularly  those  trees  around  the  residence. 
Year  after  year  I  have  seen  the  young,  growing  shoots  of  the  apples, 
cherries  and  peaches  literally  covered  with  various  kinds  of  aphids  until 
the  young  leaves  curled  up  and  stopped  growth.  Without  doubt  the 
growth  of  the  young  trees  has  been  very  much  set  back  and  the  vitality 
of  the  trees  sapped.  I  have  used  nicotine  sprays  with  more  or  less 
success,  but  it  takes  eternal  vigilance  and  many  expensive  sprayings  to 
keep  them  down. 

In  observing  the  habits  of  the  aphids  I  have  noticed  the  well-known 
fact  that  ants  were  very  much  in  evidence  wherever  the  aphids  were 
present.  I,  of  course,  had  been  told  that  the  ants  did  no  damage  to 
the  trees,  but  nevertheless  I  hated  to  see  them  profiting  from  such  a 
pest  as  the  aphids,  so  in  the  early  spring  of  1917  I  purchased  a  can  of 
tree  tanglefoot  and  applied  a  two-inch  band  of  this  sticky  material  about 
one-fourth  inch  thick  around  each  tree,  for  the  purpose  of  keeping  the 
ants  and  any  other  crawling  insect  off  the  trees.  Well,  I  stopped  the 
ants  and,  much  to  my  surprise,  I  had  no  aphids  on  the  trees.  The  aphids 
have  wings,  but  they  did  not  seem  to  use  them  to  good  advantage,  for 
wherever  there  were  no  ants  there  were  no  aphids.  Some  weeks  later 
I  noticed  on  an  apple  tree  some  aphids  and,  looking  closer,  I  saw  some 
ants.  I  examined  the  sticky  band  on  the  tree  trunk  and  found  that 
some  tall  grass  had  bridged  it  over,  allowing  the  ants  to  get  up  the 
tree,  where,  I  presume,  they  carried  the  aphids.  I  removed  the  grass, 
sprayed  the  tree  with  nicotine  and  had  no  more  aphids  on  that  tree. 
It  appeared  to  me  that  my  young  trees  made  a  much  more  vigorous 
and  sustained  growth  than  the.^  ever  did  before. 

Among  other  trees  I  banded  was  a  sour  cherry  standing  near  a 
fence.  The  tanglefoot  was  applied  high  to  this  tree.  A  water  sprout 
that  came  out  below  the  tanglefoot  was  soon  completely  covered  with 
black  aphids,  while  not  an  aphid  was  to  be  seen  above  the  band  until 
some  weeks  later,  when  the  limbs  near  the  fence,  becoming  heavy  with 
fruit  and  new  growth,  sagged  and  touched  the  fence.  Then  ants  and 
aphids  appeared  on  that  side  and  gradually  spread  all  over  the  whole 
tree.  I  watched  my  trees  all  sumn.rr,  and  so  long  as  I  kept  the  ants 
off  the  trees  I  saw  only  a  few  scattering  aphids.    I  saw  one  good  colony 


(245) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


246        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

of  aphids,  on  a  peach  tree,  that  must  have  obtained  a  foothold  by  flying. 
This  colony  was  destroyed  by  means  of  nicotine  spray,  and  I  had  no 
further  trouble  with  that  tree. 

At  intervals  during  the  summer  the  sticky  band  had  to  be  freshened. 
I  used  a  band  about  two  inches  wide  and  from  one-eighth  to  one-fourth 
inch  thick.  None  of  my  trees  seem  to  have  been  injured  in  the  least 
at  the  end  of  a  year  and  one-half.  The  experience  of  1917  was  repeated 
with  practically  the  same  results  in  1918. 

It  may  be  wondered  why,  if  the  aphids  can  fly,  they  did  not  get  on 
the  trees  above  the  sticky  bands.  In  reading  Farmers'  Bulletin  No.  362, 
U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture,  on  "The  Common  Mealy  Bug  and  Its 
Control  in  California,"  I  ran  across  a  good  explanation.  Ants  were 
found  to  carry  and  protect  the  mealy  bugs  in  the  same  way  they  do  the 
aphids.  Woglum  and  Nuels  in  this  bulletin  say:  "Remarkable  results 
have  been  secured  by  keeping  the  Argentine  ant  off  of  trees  infested 
with  mealy  bugs  by  banding  with  a  sticky  mixture.  In  1915  and  1916, 
trees  that  when  first  freed  from  ants  were  infested  severely  with  the 
mealy  bug  became  commercially  clean  without  exception  within  a  period 
of  six  weeks  to  three  months."  It  seems  that  the  ant  not  only  carried 
but  protected  the  mealy  bug  from  its  natural  enemies,  the  brown  lace- 
wings  and  a  ladybird  beetle. 

It  seems  logical  to  suppose  that  the  same  relation  would  exist  between 
the  aphids,  the  ants  and  the  enemies  of  the  aphids,  such  as  the  ladybugs. 
Although  the  mealy  bug  does  not  fly,  as  does  the  aphid,  the  fact  remains 
that  the  aphid,  like  the  mealy  bug,  seems  to  depend  upon  the  ant  for 
protection  and  cannot  long  survive  the  attacks  of  its  enemies  when  this 
protection  is  withdrawn. 

One  entomologist  told  me,  "You  keep  the  aphids  off  your  trees  and 
the  ants  will  not  bother  you."  But  I  say,  "Keep  the  ants  off  and  you 
will  not  be  bothered  with  aphids."  It  is  much  easier  to  work  from  the 
ant  end  of  the  game  than  it  is  from  the  aphid  end. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Memorial  of  Albert  Homer  Purdue. 


By  George  H.  Ashley,  The  United  States  Geological  Survey. 


(Reprinted  from  the  Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of  America, 
Vol.  29,  pp.  55-64,  pi.  7.     Published  March  31,  1918.) 

Published  by  request  in  Proceedings  of  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Albert  Homer  Purdue,  late  State  Geologist  of  Tennessee,  was  bom 
March  29,  1861,  in  Warrick  County,  Indiana,  near  Yankeetown — a  small 
village  in  the  loess-covered  hills  bordering  the  Ohio  River — an  hour's 
ride  by  trolley  east  from  Evansville.  While  the  people  of  the  town  came, 
as  a  rule,  from  Yankeeland,  one  of  Mr.  Purdue's  g^randfathers  had  been 
an  early  settler  in  western  middle  Tennessee.  His  early  education  was 
obtained  at  Yankeetown  and  later  at  the  Indiana  State  Normal  School 
at  Terre  Haute,  from  which  he  graduated  in  1886.  In  1886-1887  Mr. 
Purdue  taught  at  Sullivan,  Indiana.  In  1887-1888  he  was  superintend- 
ent of  public  schools  at  West  Plains,  Missouri.  In  1887,  at  Indianapolis, 
Indiana,  he  married  Miss  Bertha  Lee  Burdick,  who  died  of  consumption 
a  year  later.  From  1889  to  1891  he  was  assistant  superintendent  of  the 
United  States  Indian  School  at  Albuquerque,  New  Mexico.  Part  of  his 
duties  were  the  selection  of  children  from  the  reservation  for  the  schpol 
and  the  rounding  up  of  boys  who  had  run  away — a  line  of  work  that  led 
to  many  interesting  experiences.  From  1891  to  1894  he  was  at  Stanford 
University,  from  which  he  obtained  the  degree  of  A.  B.  in  1893.  While 
there  he  made  geologic  studies  on  the  San  Francisco  Peninsula,  and 
during  1892-1893  was  an  assistant  geologist  for  the  Arkansas  Geolog^ical 
Survey  with  the  writer,  studying  the  southern  part  of  the  Ouachita 
uplift.  This  association  with  Purdue  in  the  field  during  the  summer 
and  fall  of  1892  was  one  of  the  pleasantest  epochs  in  the  writer's  life. 
We  were  living  on  the  country,  in  a  reg^ion  little  settled  at  that  time, 
and  Purdue's  vivid  description  of  his  week's  experience,  when  we  got 
together  at  the  end  of  each  week,  gave  an  air  of  romance  and  adventure 
to  the  whole  undertaking.  This  work  and  that  in  the  Coast  Range 
Mountains  of  California,  both  under  the  eye  of  Branner  and  with  his 
counsel,  Purdue  counted  as  among  the  most  valuable  training  experi- 
ences he  could  have  had,  as  he  could  not  help  getting  somewhat  of 
Branner's  broad  point  of  view  and  critical  study  of  details.  In  1894, 
after  a  year  of  graduate  work  at  Stanford,  he  became  a  candidate  for 
the  elective  position  of  State  Geologist  of  Indiana;  but  his  long  absence 


(247) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


248        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 


A.  H.  Purdue. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Albert  Homer  Purdue,  249 

from  the  State  had  put  him  out  of  touch  with  the  political  personnel  of 
the  Republican  party  and  he  failed  to  get  the  nomination.  Perhaps  he 
would  have  succeeded  if  he  had  listened  to  the  demands  of  those  who 
wished  the  promise  of  places  which  they  were  not  prepared  to  fill.  The 
winter  following  he  was  principal  of  the  high  school  at  Rensselaer, 
Indiana.  Then  came  a  year  of  graduate  work  as  a  Fellow  at  the  Uni- 
versity of  Chicago. 

His  professional  career  began  in  1896,  when  he  was  elected  Professor 
of  Greology  at  the  University  of  Arkansas,  his  position  after  1902  being 
that  of  Professor  of  Geology  and  Mining.  Here  his  executive  ability 
and  judgment  were  early  recognized,  and  as  time  went  on  more  and 
more  of  the  administrative  committee  work  of  the  university  fell  on  his 
shoulders.  He  was  chairman  of  the  Committee  on  Student  Affairs  and 
of  the  Classification  Committee,  which  had  in  charge  the  arrangement 
of  courses,  etc.  In  1898  he  married  Miss  Ida  Pace,  of  Harrison,  Arkan- 
sas, at  that  time  Associate  Professor  of  English  at  the  university — a 
woman  of  unusual  mental  and  social  attainments,  who  comes  of  a  family 
distingfuished  in  the  life  of  Arkansas.  In  1895,  again  in  1901,  and  from 
then  on  Mr.  Purdue  was  a  field  assistant  on  the  United  States  Geological 
Survey,  devoting  his  summers  to  field-work.  With  the  Survey  he  had 
the  reputation  of  being  one  of  the  very  few  teaching  geologists  whom 
that  organization  could  count  on  to  carry  out  a  progrram  not  only  in 
the  field  but  in  the  oflice  preparation  of  his  reports.  At  the  time  of  the 
St.  Louis  Exposition  he  was  made  Superintendent  of  Mines  and  Metal- 
lurgy for  the  State.  In  1907  Mr.  Purdue  was  made  State  Geologist 
ex  officio  of  the  Arkansas  Survey.  Though  having  at  his  disposal  only 
very  meager  funds,  Purdue  was  able  to  prepare  or  have  prepared  a 
number  of  highly  creditable  reports,  including  one  on  the  sla*tes  of  the 
State,  by  himself;  one  by  Prof.  W.  N.  Gladson  on  the  water  powers  of 
the  State,  and  one  by  Prof.  A.  A.  Steel  on  mining  methods  in  the  coal 
fields  of  the  State. 

As  a  teacher,  Purdue  brought  to  his  work  the  results  of  his  normal- 
school  preparation,  and  the  training  received  under  Branner  and  J.  P. 
Smith  at  Stanford,  and  Salisbury,  Chamberlain  and  others  at  Chicago, 
together  with  his  own  rathef  varied  experience  along  that  line.  He  was 
not  a  believer  in  the  lecture  method  of  instruction,  but  rather  in  the 
students  working  out  their  results  under  the  stimulus  of  actual  contact 
with  the  problems  in  the  field  and  laboratory,  and  in  this  knowledge 
being  reinforced  by  repeated  review  and  by  application  to  new  and 
practical  problems.  He  had  little  regard  for  the  student  who  would  not 
work  and  he  would  bar  such  students  as  much  as  possible  from  his 
classes.  The  great  energy  he  put  into  his  teaching  ip  both  the  class- 
room and  field  wonderfully  impressed  his  students  and  assistants,  so 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


250        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

that  he  constantly  inspired  them  to  obtain  g^reater  results  and  attain 
higher  ideals.  When  he  left  the  University  of  Arkansas  the  students 
presented  him  a  silver  loving  cup  as  a  token  of  the  respect  they  held 
for  him  as  a  teacher.  His  students  speak  of  his  class-work  being  as 
good  as  any  course  in  logic,  as  he  led  them  to  analyze  their  data  and 
taught  them  how  to  draw  proper  conclusions  therefrom;  so  that,  aside 
from  those  who  decided  to  take  up  geology  as  a  profession,  his  old 
students,  scattered  all  over  the  United  States,  look  back  to  the  work  in 
his  classes  as  one  of  the  most  profitable  experiences  of  their  university 
life.  Among  his  students  who  were  led  into  adopting  geology  as  a  life 
work  may  be  named  Miser  and  Mesler,  of  the  United  States  Geological 
Survey;  Carl  Smith,  Munn,  McCreary,  Hutchinson,  and  others,  who, 
after  more  or  less  time  spent  with  the  national  organization,  have  gone 
into  consulting  or  professional  work  in  the  oil  industry. 

Purdue  had  great  faith  in  the  constructive  ability  of  the  boy  brought 
up  on  the  farm,  in  which  class  most  of  his  students  fell,  and  in  a  talk 
a  few  years  ago  he  explained  the  reason  for  that  ability  as  due  to  the 
constant  association  in  labor  of  father  and  son  on  the  farm,  the  son 
getting  the  advantage  of  the  father's  example  and  counsel  as  they 
worked  together  in  the  fields  or  gardens,  and  thus  acquiring  ideals  of 
industry,  efficiency  and  initiative  commonly  lacking  in  the  city-  or  town- 
bred  boy. 

In  1912  Mr.  Purdue  was  elected  State  Geologist  of  Tennessee,  which 
position  he  filled  with  honor  to  himself  and  the  State  until  his  death, 
on  December  12,  1917.  Of  his  success  as  State  Geologist  of  Tennessee 
the  best  testimony  is  the  steady  stream  of  high-grade  publications  that 
flowed  fro/n  his  office.  Equally  convincing  from  another  direction  is  the 
fact  that  during  the  session  of  the  last  State  legislature  his  work  and 
its  value  to  the  State  received  unstinted  praise,  and  the  enlarged  appro- 
priation for  the  work  of  the  Survey  went  through  practically  without 
question  or  opposition. 

Purdue  had  for  thirty  years  suffered  at  times  from  intestinal  trouble 
that  had  proved  more  and  more  of  a  handicap  as  time  went  on.  Last 
spring,  after  a  winter  of  unusual  demand,  he  suffered  a  sudden  attack 
of  this  old  trouble,  which  for  a  time  undermined  his  health  and  threat- 
ened to  require  an  immediate  operation.  A  number  of  trips  to  the  field 
and  for  rest  led  to  his  regaining  somewhat  his  old  vigor,  though  not 
entirely. 

The  last  week  of  November  he  made  an  automobile  trip  into  east 
Tennessee  for  the  purpose  of  studying  the  manganese  deposits  of  that 
reg^ion.  He  became  so  ill  that  he  stored  his  car  and  returned  to  Nash- 
ville by  railroad.  He  was  taken  immediately  to  a  local  hospital  and, 
after  a  few  days,  underwent  an  operation,  with  the  hope  of  having  his 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Albert  Homer  Purdue.  251 

health  restored.  The  morning  of  the  operation  he  dictated  for  publica- 
tion in  the  Resources  of  Tennessee  a  paper  giving  the  results  of  his 
recent  investigation  of  manganese.  Then  he  walked  into  the  operating 
room  as  calmly  as  if  he  were  going  into  his 'office  for  a  day's  work. 
At  first  everything  indicated  a  speedy  recovery,  but  complications  arose 
and  he  died  a  week  later  from  uremic  poison. 

Mr.  Purdue  was  quiet  and  unassuming — a  man  who  disliked  display, 
who  sought  always  to  keep  his  own  personality  and  achievements  in  the 
background,  yet  a  man  who  made  friends  that  stuck,  because  he  could 
prove  himself  a  true  friend  under  all  circumstances;  a  man  whose  judg- 
ment was  sought  by  many ;  a  man  whose  influence  was  always  for  sanity, 
for  uplift,  for  scientific  accuracy,  even  in  the  simple  things  of  life.  I 
still  remember  that  when  we  were  working  together  in  the  mountains 
of  Arkansas,  it  was  my  method  to  fall  into  the  ways  of  the  people  with 
whom  we  were  living,  especially  in  adopting  the  vernacular  of  the 
region — a  habit  to  which  Purdue  always  objected  and  for  which  he  often 
chided  me.  He  would  insist  that,  as  educated  men,  we  had  no  right 
not  to  give  the  mountain  people  a  glimpse  of  correct  English.  This 
same  regard  for  the  Queen's  English  is  seen  in  the  painstaking  care 
with  which  he  edited  all  of  the  manuscripts  published  by  him  as  State 
Geologrist. 

As  a  field  geologist,  Purdue  was  tireless,  painstaking  and  thorough, 
and  the  same  energy  and  careful  attention  characterized  all  of  the  prep- 
aration of  his  reports.  This  desire  for  high  quality  and  accuracy  doubt- 
less reduced  somewhat  the  number  and  length  of  papers  prepared  by 
him,  but  his  work  made  up  in  quality  what  it  lacked  in  volume. 

While  he  was  at  the  University  of  Arkansas  he  spent  the  summer 
months  in  the  field  in  that  State — most  of  the  time  in  camp  with  a  party 
of  from  one  to  three  of  his  students — and  wrote  his  reports  at  odd 
moments  during  the  school  year.  Although  his  field-work  was  varied, 
it  consisted  mainly  of  detailed  areal  mapping  for  the  United  States 
Geological  Survey  in  a  number  of  quadrangles  in  the  northwestern  and 
west-central  parts  of  the  State.  Whenever  funds  were  appropriated  by 
the  Arkansas  legislature  for  the  State  Survey  he  made  it  count  as  much 
as  possible  by  co-operating  with  the  United  States  Geological  Survey. 
Most  of  his  geologic  work  in  Tennessee  was  administrative,  but  he  found 
time  to  make  numerous  short  field  trips  into  different  parts  of  the  State. 
Much  of  the  work  carried  on  under  his  administration  as  State  Geologist 
in  that  State  was  done  in  co-operation  with  the  United  States  Geolog^ical 
Survey  and  the  United  States  Soil  Survey. 

Among  his  more  important  papers  are  the  Winslow  and  Eureka 
Springs-Harrison  folios  and  the  De  Queen-Caddo  Gap  and  Hot  Springs 
folios,  awaiting  publication;  the  slate  deposits  of  Arkansas,  besides  a 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


252        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 

large  number  of  shorter  publications  issued  by  the  United  States  Cteo- 
logical  Survey,  State  Surveys  of  Arkansas  and  Tennessee,  and  many 
others  published  in  magazines  or  elsewhere.  Considering  the  large 
amount  of  administrative  work  in  the  University  of  Arkansas  that  fell 
to  his  lot,  this  is  a  rather  remarkable  showing  of  scientific  results  for  a 
teaching  professor  occupying  practically  the  whole  bench  of  geology. 

Mr.  Purdue  was  a  member  of  the  American  Institute  of  Mining 
Engineers,  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Sciences,  the  National  Geographic 
Society,  and  the  Seismological  Society  of  America.  He  was  a  Fellow 
of  the  American  Association  for  the  Advancement  of  Science,  the  Geo- 
logical Society  of  America,  and  the  Geological  Society  of  London.  He 
often  attended  the  meetings  of  State  Geologists,  of  the  Conservation 
Congress,  and  of  the  Southern  Commercial  Congress.  While  at  the 
University  of  Arkansas  he  was  made  a  teacher  member  of  the  Kappa 
Alpha  fraternity.  In  1907  he  was  elected  to  the  Stanford  chapter  of 
Sigma  Xi.  The  commencement  following  his  resignation  as  Professor 
of  Geology  at  the  University  of  Arkansas  that  institution  conferred  on 
him  the  degree  of  LL.D.  There  was  no  recognition  that  he  prized  more 
highly  than  his  election,  in  1911,  to  the  Council  of  the  Geological  Society 
of  America.  He  was  President  of  the  Tennessee  Academy  of  Sciences 
at  the  time  of  his  death  and  was  already  considering  possible  subjects 
for  the  next  annual  address. 

As  a  citizen,  Mr.  Purdue  was  always  public-spirited,  entering  in 
large  degree  into  the  life  and  activities  of  the  place  of  his  home  and 
of  the  State  at  large.  In  Nashville,  besides  his  interest  in  the  Com- 
mercial Club,  he  was  active  in  other  civic  and  social  clubs,  including 
the  Rotary,  Freolac,  Tennessee  Historical  Society,  Nashville  Engineer- 
ing Society,  Reynolds  Lodge,  Knights  of  Pythias,  Phoenix  Lodge,  Free 
and  Accepted  Masons,  and  was  a  generous  subscriber  to  the  work  of 
various  organizations.  His  home,  with  two  boys  now  of  college  age, 
was  always  a  place  for  real  Southern  hospitality,  for  Purdue  had  a 
large  sense  of  humor  and  a  live  personal  interest  in  the  welfare  of  all  his 
friends,  and  a  wife  whose  intellectual  attainments  and  personal  charms 
not  only  added  to  the  welcome  of  the  home  but  were  a  constant  inspira- 
tion to  the  man.* 

There  is  appended  a  list  of  titles  of  papers  and  addresses,  including 
several  prepared  but  not  yet  published. 

Bibliography. 

1895.    Observations  on  the  glacial  drift  of  Jasper  County,  Indiana.    Pro- 
ceedings of  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Sciences,  1894,  pages  43-46. 
The  Charleston  (Missouri)   earthquake.    Proceedings  of  the  Indi- 
ana Academy  of  Sciences,  number  5,  pages  51-53. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Albert  Homer  Purdue.  253 

'^UdG.    Review  of  sketch  of  the  geology  of  the  San  Francisco  Peninsula, 
by  Andrew  C.  Lawson.     Journal  of  Greology,  volume  4,  pages 
640-644. 
Some  mounds  of  Vanderburg  County,  Indiana.     Proceedings  of 
the  Indiana  Academy  of  Sciences,  pages  68-70. 

1897.  A  strange  village.    "The  Ozark." 

Review  of  the  former  extension  of  the  Appalachians  across  Mis- 
sissippi, Louisiana  and  Texas,  by  J.  C.  Branner.  Journal  of 
Geology,  volume  5,  pages  759-760. 

1898.  The  geography  of  Arkansas   (text).     American  Book  Company, 

Cincinnati. 
The  function  of  Greek-letter  fraternities.    "The  Ozark." 

1899.  The  geography  of  Arkansas.    Arkansas  School  Journal. 
Review  of  the  department  of  geology  and  natural  resources  of 

Indiana,   Twenty-third   Annual    Report.     Journal   of   Geology, 
volume  7,  pages  720-721. 

1901.  Valleys  of  solution  in  northern  Arkansas.     Journal  of  Geology, 

volume  9,  pages  47-50,  2  figfures. 

Physiography  of  the  Boston  Mountains.  Journal  of  Geolog^y,  vol- 
ume 9,  pages  694-701,  2  figures. 

Responsibilities  of  university  students.     "The  Ozark." 

Illustrated  note  on  a  miniature  overthrust*  fault  and  anticline. 
Journal  of  Geology,  volume  9,  pages  341-342,  1  figrure. 

Lead  and  zinc  deposits  of  north  Arkansas.  Lead  and  Zinc  News, 
St.  Louis,  volume  1,  number  2. 

1902.  Review   of  evolution  of  the   northern   part  of   the  lowlands  of 

southeastern  Missouri,  by  C.  F.  Marbut.     Journal  of  Geologry, 
volume  10,  number  8,  pages  919-921. 
Demands  upon  university  curricula.     Proceedings  of  the  Ninth 
Annual  Meeting,  Southern  Educational  Association,  pages  188- 
199. 

1903.  Geographic  processes.    New  York  Teachers*  Monograph,  volume  5, 

number  2. 
Is  the  normal  school  passing?   Atlantic  Educational  Journal. 
The  saddle-back  topography  of  the  Boone  chert  reg^ion,  Arkansas 

(abstract).     Science,  new  series,  volume  17,  page  222. 
On  the  origin  of  geographic  forms.     Arkansas  School  Journal. 

1904.  A  topographic  result  of  the  alluvial  cone.     Proceedings  of  the 

Indiana  Academy  of  Sciences,  1903,  pages  109-111,  6  figures. 
Notes    on    the   wells,   springs,    and    general    water    resources   of 
Arkansas.      United    States    Geological    Survey    Water-supply 
Paper  102,  pages  374-388. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


254        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

1905.  Water  resources  of  the  Winslow  quadrangle,  Arkansas.     United 

States  Geological  Survey  Water-supply  Paper  145,  pages  84-87, 

1  figure. 
Underground   waters   of   the   eastern    United    States  —  northern 

Arkansas.      United    States    Geological    Survey    Water-supply 

Paper  114,  pages  188-197,  4  figures. 
Concerning  the  natural  mounds.     Science,  new  series,  volume  21, 

pages  823-824. 
Water  resources  of  the  contact  region  between  the  Paleozoic  and 

Mississippi  embayment  deposits  in  northern  Arkansas.     United 

States  Geological  Survey  Water-supply  Paper  145,  pages  88- 

119. 
Address  representing  the  faculty  at  the  inauguration  of  J.  N. 

Tillman  as  President  of  the  University  of  Arkansas,  Septem- 
ber 20. 

1906.  Is  the  multiplication  of  mining  schools  justifiable?    Mines  and 

Minerals,  voliune  26,  pages  411-412. 
A  discussion  of  the  structural  relations  of  the  Wisconsin  zinc  and 
lead  deposits,  by  Professor  Grant.    Economic  Geology,  volume  1, 
number  4,  pages  391-392. 

1907.  Developed    phosphate    deposits    of    northern    Arkansas.      United 

States  Geological  Survey,  Bulletin  315,  pages  463-473. 

On  the  origin  of  limestone  sink-holes.  Science,  new  series,  vol- 
ume 26,  pages  120-122. 

Cave-sandstone  deposits  of  the  southern  Ozarks.  Bulletin  of  the 
Geological  Society  of  America,  volume  18,  pages  251-256,  1 
plate,  1  figrure.  Abstract,  Science,  new  series,  volume  25,  page 
764. 

United  States  Geological  Survey  Greological  Atlas,  Winslow  folio 
(number  154),  6  pages,  4  figures,  2  maps,  and  columnar-section 
sheet. 

1908.  A  new  discovery  of  peridotite  in  Arkansas.     Economic  Geology, 

volume  3,  number  6,  pages  525-528,  2  figfures. 

1909.  The  slates  of  Arkansas.    Arkansas  Geological  Survey,  pages  1-95, 

7  plates. 
Structure  and  stratigraphy  of  the  Ouachita  Ordovician  area,  Ar- 
kansas (abstract).    Bulletin  of  the  Geological  Society  of  Amer- 
ica, volume  19,  pages  556-557. 

1910.  The  collecting  area  of  the  waters  of  the  hot  springs.  Hot  Springs, 

Arkansas.     Proceedings  of  the  Indiana  Academy  of  Sciences, 
1909,   pages  269-275;   Journal   of   Geology,  volume   18,  pages 
279-285. 
The  slates  of  Arkansas.     United  States  Creological  Survey,  Bulle- 
tin 430,  pages  317-334. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Albert  Homer  Purdue.  255 

Mineral  deposits  of  western  and  northern  Arkansas.  Fort  Smith 
Times-Record,  pages  123-127. 

The  stored  fuels  of  Arkansas  (booklet).  Published  by  Fort  Smith 
Conmiercial  League,  1910;  also  Proceedings  of  Arkansas  Bank- 
ers' Association. 

Possibilities  of  the  clay  industry  in  Arkansas  (booklet).  Pub- 
lished by  the  Brick  Makers'  Association  of  Arkansas,  Little 
Rock. 

Some  essentials  of  public  speaking  (abstract).  University  Weekly, 
Fayetteville,  Arkansas. 

1911.  The  operation  of  the  mine-run  law  in  Arkansas.     Arkansas  Ga- 

zette. 

Recently  discovered  hot  springs  in  Arkansas.  Journal  of  (Jeologry, 
volume  19,  number  3,  pages  272-275,  2  figrures. 

The  operation  of  the  mine-run  law  in  Arkansas.  The  Trades- 
man, volume  66,  number  19,  pages  27-28. 

1912.  Some  neglected  principles  of  physiography.     Proceedings  of  the 

Indiana  Academy  of  Sciences,  1911,  pages  83-87,  1  figrure. 

Reported  discovery  of  radium  in  northern  Arkansas.  Science, 
new  series,  volume  35,  number  904,  page  658. 

Compendium  of  the  mineral  resources  of  Arkansas.  [Little  Rock] 
Board  of  Trade  Bulletin,  30  pages. 

On  the  impounding  of  waters  to  prevent  floods.  Tennessee  Geo- 
logical Survey,  The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  2,  num- 
ber 6,  pages  226-230. 

The  waste  from  Hillside  wash.  Tennessee  Geological  Survey, 
The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  2,  number  6,  pages  250- 
254. 

Administrative  report  of  the  State  Geological  Survey,  1912.  Ten- 
nessee State  Geological  Survey,  Bulletin  15,  17  pages. 

The  iron  industry  of  Lawrence  and  Wayne  counties.  Tennessee 
Geological  Survey,  The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  2,  num- 
ber 10,  pages  370-388,  7  figures. 

Failure  of  the  Nashville  reservoir.  Eng^ineering  Record,  volume 
66,  number  20,  page  539. 

The  zinc  deposits  of  northeastern  Tennessee.  Tennessee  Geologi- 
cal Survey,  Bulletin  14,  69  pages,  1  plate  (map),  30  figures. 

The  zinc  deposits  of  northern  Tennessee.  Mining  Science,  volume 
66,  pages  249-251,  2  figures. 

1913.  The  importance  of  saving  our  soils.     Tennessee  Geological  Sur- 

vey, The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  3,  number  1,  pages 
50-53. 
Water  supply  for  cities  and  towns.    Tennessee  Creological  Survey, 
The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  3,  number  2,  pages  80-83, 
1  figure. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


256        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Geology  and  Engineering.  Tennessee  Geological  Survey,  The  Re- 
sources of  Tennessee,  volume  3,  number  2,  pages  105-109,  3 
figures. 

Failure  of  the  reservoir  at  Johnson  City,  Tennessee.  Engineering 
Record,  volume  67,.  number  22,  page  600. 

The  gullied  lands  of  west  Tennessee.  Tennessee  Geological  Sur- 
vey, The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  3,  number  3,  pages 
119-136,  8  figures. 

The  minerals  of  Tennessee,  their  nature,  uses,  occurrence,  and 
literature  (literature  by  Elizabeth  Cockrill),  Tennessee  Geo- 
logical Survey,  The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  3,  number 
4,  pages  183-230. 

Field  and  office  methods  in  the  preparation  of  geolog^ic  reports; 
note  taking.     Economic  Geology,  volume  8,  number  7,  page  712. 

The  education  of  and  for  the  farm.  Tennessee  Agriculture,  Pro- 
ceedings of  the  Middle  Tennessee  Farmers'  Institute,  Twelfth 
Annual  Convention,  pages  425-428. 

1914.  The  State  Geologist  and  conservation.    Tennessee  Geological  Sur- 

vey, The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  4,  number  1,  pages 
24-28. 

A  double  waste  from  hillside  wash.  Tennessee  Geological  Survey, 
The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  4,  number  1,  pages  3-37. 

The  education  of  mine  foremen   (an  address). 

Bauxite  in  Tennessee.  Tennessee  Geological  Survey,  The  Re- 
sources of  Tennessee,  volume  4,  number  2,  pages  87-92,  2 
figrures. 

Road  materials  of  Tennessee.  Tennessee  Geolog^ical  Survey,  The 
Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  4,  number  3,  pages  132-135. 

Some  neglected  principles  of  physiography  (abstract).  Transac- 
tions of  the  Tennessee  Academy  of  Sciences,  volume  1,  pages 
92-94. 

Zinc  mining  in  Tennessee.  Engineering  and  Mining  Journal, 
volume  98,  number  10,  pages  419-421,  4  figures,  map. 

Administrative  report  of  the  State  Geolog^ist,  1914.  Tennessee 
Geological  Survey,  Bulletin  18,  17  pages. 

1915.  Why  not  call  things  by   their   right  names?    Engineering  and 

Mining  Journal,  volume  100,  number  19,  pages  765-766. 
The  call  of  the  world  (an  address). 

1916.  Oil  and  gas  conditions  in  the  Central  Basin  of  Tennessee.     Ten- 

nessee Geological  Survey,  The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  6, 
number  1,  pages  1-16,  1  plate,  1  figure. 
Oil  and  gas  conditions  in  the  Reelfoot  Lake  district  of  Tennessee. 
Tennessee  Geolog^ical  Survey,  The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  vol- 
ume 6,  number  1,  pages  17-36,  3  figures. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Albert  Homer  Purdue.  257 

A  plea  for  better  English.  Stanford  Alumnus,  volume  17,  num- 
ber 5,  pages  182-184. 

Notes  on  manganese  in  east  Tennessee.  Tennessee  Geolog^ical 
Survey,  The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  6,  number  2,  pages 
111-123. 

Materials  of  Tennessee  that  invite  the  chemist.  Manufacturers' 
Record,  volume  70,  number  11,  page  110. 

The  nature  of  private  reports.  Engineering  and  Mining  Journal, 
volume  102,  number  13,  page  546. 

United  States  Geological  Survey  Geological  Atlas,  Eureka  Springs- 
Harrison  folio    (number  202),  22  pages,  6  plates,  13  figures. 
(By  A.  H.  Purdue  and  H.  D.  Miser.) 
1917.    The  State  Geologist  and  conservation.     Science,  new  series,  vol- 
ume 45,  number  1159,  pages  249-252. 

Administrative  report  of  the  State  Geolog^ist.  Tennessee  Geo- 
logical Survey,  The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  7,  number  1, 
pages  5-25. 

By-product  coke  and  oven  opportunities  in  Tennessee.  Tennessee 
Geologrical  Survey,  The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  7,  num- 
ber 1,  pages  26-39,  2  figrures. 

The  Glenmary  oil  field.  Tennessee  Geological  Survey,  The  Re- 
sources of  Tennessee,  volume  7,  number  2,  pages  105-108. 

General  oil  and  gas  conditions  of  the  Highland  Rim  area  in  Ten- 
nessee. Tennessee  Geological  Survey,  The  Resources  of  Ten- 
nessee, volume  7,  number  4,  pages  220-228. 

Things  the  farmer  should  know.  Cumberland  Valley  National 
Bank  letter,  Nashville,  Tennessee. 

Bauxite  in  the  United  States,  1916.  Mineral  Industry  during 
1916,  pages  42-47. 

Unpublished  Reports. 

Manganese  deposits  of  Bradley  County.     Tennessee  Geological  Survey, 

The  Resources  of  Tennessee,  volume  8,  number  1,  January,  1918,  pages 

46-47.     (In  press.) 
Gravel  deposits  of  the  Caddo  Gap  and  De  Queen  quadrangles.     United 

States  Geological   Survey,  Bulletin  690-B.      (By  A.  H.  Purdue  and 

H.  D.  Miser;  in  press.) 
Asphalt  deposits  and  oil  and  gas  conditions  in  southwestern  Arkansas. 

United  States  Geolog^ical  Survey  Bulletin.      (By  A.  H.   Purdue  and 

H.  D.  Miser;  in  preparation.) 
United   States   Geological   Survey   Geological   Atlas,  Hot   Springs  folio. 

(By  A.  H.  Purdue  and  H.  D.  Miser;  in  preparation.) 
United  States  Geological  Survey  Geological  Atlas,  De  Queen-Caddo  Gap 

folio.     (By  A.  H.  Purdue  and  H.  D.  Miser;  in  preparation.) 

17—16668 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


258        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


Professor  M.  J.  Golden,  Noted  Educator,  Called  by 

Death. 


R.  B.  Trueblood,  Purdue  University. 


In  the  death  of  Michael  Joseph  Golden,  for  years  a  member  of  the 
Purdue  University  faculty,  which  occurred  December  18,  1918,  at  his 
home,  320  State  Street,  West  Lafayette,  Ind.,  this  community  and  the 
professions  of  engrineering  and  education  lose  a  noted  educator  and 
highly  esteemed  citizen.  Professor  Golden  retired  as  an  active  member 
of  the  faculty  in  1916,  after  rendering  extraordinary  service  since  1884. 
He  was  beloved  by  students,  faculty  and  alumni,  and,  although  he  was 
a  strict  disciplinarian,  he  was  ever  eminently  square  in  his  dealings  with 
the  student  body,  to  whom  he  was  familiarly  known  as  "Mike."  That 
in  the  university  community  Professor  Golden  was  not  fully  appreciated 
by  the  freshmen  was  a  result  of  intent  on  the  part  of  upperclass  men 
to  inspire  awe  and  even  fear  in  the  hearts  of  the  first-year  men.  This 
was  possible  in  some  measure  because  of  Professor  Golden*s  manner 
of  speech  to  his  freshmen  classes,  which  was  well  designed  to  inspire 
respect  for  things  good  and  true,  and  to  discourage  the  habits  of  in- 
attention, indolence  and  dishonesty.  Even  these  students,  however,  soon 
learned  that  their  interests  were  his  interests,  for  he  was  in  sympathy 
with  all  student  activities  and  took  prominent  part  in  many  of  them. 

He  believed  in  practicing  what  he  preached.  He  was  always  ready 
and  willing  to  help  those  who  helped  themselves  and  needed  help,  and 
on  the  other  hand  he  believed  it  was  the  right  and  privilege  of  every 
student  to  be  allowed  to  get  his  own  education. 

He  took  advantage  of  every  opportunity  presented  by  critical  situa- 
tions in  the  activities  of  students  to  urge  them  to  dealings  of  justice, 
honesty  and  courtesy  among  themselves  and  with  their  opponents.  He 
was  one  of  the  staunchest  advocates  of  athletics  Purdue  had,  and  his 
brilliant  personality  and  keen  sense  of  humor  made  him  a  figfure  much 
sought  after  in  all  gatherings  of  students  and  alumni.  He  was  for 
years  a  member  of  the  board  of  insignia  of  the  athletic  association. 
Probably  no  other  individual  in  the  university  community  wielded  so 
widespread  and  so  effective  an  influence  for  the  better  things  in  the 
university  life  of  the  student  as  did  he. 

None  knew  better  than  his  colleag^ues  his  professional  ability,  his 
kindliness  and  his  generosity.  His  was  a  character  of  strength.  No 
adjectives  are  required  in  such  a  description.     He  was  honest,  frank 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


*     Professor  M.  J,  Golden.  259 

and  fearless.  He  was  loyal  to  his  family,  to  his  friends,  to  his  Alma 
Mater,  and  last  of  all  to  himself.  His  feeling  of  loyalty  to  Purdue 
weighed  heavily  against  flattering  offers  which  would  take  him  away. 

So  he  remained,  striving  with  all  his  energy  to  make  his  department 
in  the  university  do  its  work  so  well  that  there  was  no  other  anywhere 
doing  it  better.  His  constant  aim  was  to  co-ordinate  the  work  of  prac- 
tical mechanics  with  the  needs  of  the  employers  of  engineering  gradu- 
ates. In  this  problem  the  interests  in  contact  are  many  and  varied, 
so  that  progrress  was  necessarily  slow;  but  every  line  of  work  in  the 
department  reflects  his  effort,  which  was  tireless. 

Professor  Golden  was  a  Canadian  by  birth,  having  been  born  in 
Stratford,  Can.,  November  17,  1862.  He  received  his  early  education 
at  Lawrence,  Mass.,  and  was  for  some  time  a  special  student  at  the 
Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology.  For  one  year  he  was  instructor 
in  mechanical  drawing  at  the  high  school  at  Hyde  Park,  Mass.  He 
came  to  Purdue  in  1884  as  instructor  in  shop  work.  In  1894  he  received 
his  degree  from  Purdue  University  as  a  mechanical  engineer.  From 
1889  until  June,  1916,  he  served  as  professor  in  practical  mechanics  at 
Purdue,  and  has  been  Director  of  the  practical  mechanics  laboratory 
since  1907.  In  shop  management  and  shop  experiments  he  was  intensely 
interested.  On  one  trip  east  for  a  short  period  of  time  he  began  making 
experiments  with  ball  bearingfs,  and  he  is  said  to  have  been  one  of  the 
first  experimenters  in  that  line.  Upon  his  return  these  experiments 
were  continued  here,  and  valuable  conclusions  resulted  from  the  data 
received  from  them.  Keen  appreciation  of  manufacturing  conditions,  fine 
perception  and  good  judgnnent  prompted  Professor  Golden  in  the  de- 
velopment of  his  department,  which  increased  in  size  and  effectiveness 
under  his  guidance,  becoming  a  model  of  its  kind.  His  course  of  shop 
lectures  was  perhaps  the*best  and  most  comprehensive  in  existence  and 
proved  of  almost  inestimable  value  to  the  young  engineer;  so  much  so 
that  it  is  indeed  seldom  but  that  a  returning  alumnus  speaks  of  his 
indebtedness  for  this  work. 

His  last  notable  work  was  in  connection  with  the  instruction  in 
mechanical  drawing.  This  work  was  developed  to  such  a  state  that 
the  results  were  highly  satisfactory  to  both  students  and  instructors, 
and  by  it  the  efficiency  of  this  part  of  his  department  was  very  consid- 
erably increased.  His  educational  work  was  more  far-reaching  than 
was  generally  known.  He  was  the  author  of  texts  used  in  correspond- 
ence-school instruction. 

He  spent  a  great  deal  of  time  in  research,  in  collaboration  with  his 
sister,  Mrs.  Bitting,  investigating  microscopically  the  structure  of  wood. 
For  this  work  he  designed  and  built  much  special  apparatus.  His  talents 
in  photography  lent  themselves  well  to  this  work,  the  results  of  which 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


260        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

are  highly  appreciated  by  investigators  as  well  as  commercially.  Pro- 
fessor Golden's  appreciation  of  the  beautiful  in  nature  and  in  art  was 
greater  than  usually  is  the  lot  of  the  layman.  Among  those  who  have 
received  most  generously  of  his  most  willing  aid,  and  who  mourn  him 
most  sincerely,  are  the  Sisters  of  St.  Francis  of  St.  Elizabeth  Hospital, 
where  he  lectured  and  taught,  planned  and  advised,  taking  of  his  own 
time  unselfishly  for  this  work. 

In  June,  1916,  Professor  Golden  was  granted  a  leave  of  absence 
because  of  ill  health,  and  he  retired  from  the  faculty  in  1917.  Professor 
Golden  was  a  member  of  the  Theta  Xi  fraternity,  Indiana  Academy  of 
Science,  American  Society  of  Mechanical  Engineers,  the  American  Soci- 
ety of  Naval  Engineers,  and  the  Manual  Training  Teachers'  Association 
of  America.  He  was  a  devout  member  of  St.  Mary's  Church  and  was 
for  many  years  chancellor  for  the  Knights  of  Columbus,  relinquishing 
this  post  because  of  ill  health. 

Since  his  retirement  in  1916,  he  had  devoted  his  time  to  traveling, 
in  the  hopes  of  benefiting  his  failing  health.  Professor  Golden  is  sur- 
vived by  three  sisters:  Miss  Josephine  Golden,  320  State  Street,  West 
Lafayette;  Miss  Helen  Golden,  professor  in  mechanical  drawing  at 
Purdue,  and  Mrs.  Katherine  Bitting  of  Washington,  D.  C. 

Professor  Golden  was  the  author  of  "A  Laboratory  Course  in  Wood 
Turning"  and  "Pattern  Making  Notes,"  both  used  in  the  imiversity  as 
texts;  "Shop  Lecture  Notes,"  which  were  so  used  for  years;  "Pattern 
Making,"  which  he  wrote  for  the  International  Correspondence  School, 
and  "Molding,"  which  he  prepared  for  the  same  school.  Besides  these 
he  has  written  brochures  and  pamphlets  descriptive  of  "Purdue  Uni- 
versity Shops,"  "Tests  of  Ball  Bearings,"  and  other  engineering  papers. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Some  Trees  op  Indiana. 


By  F.  M.  Andrews. 


Some  trees  that  are  exceptional  for  size,  or  for  some  other  facts, 
have  been  mentioned  from  time  to  time.  A  few  of  these,  together  with 
some  facts,  will  be  briefly  referred  to  here. 

One  of  our  largest  and  most  beautiful  trees,  Liriodendron  Tulipifera 
L.,  has  attained,  as  is  well  known,  great  dimensions  both  in  height  and 
in  diameter.  Britton*  in  his  Illustrated  Flora  gives  this  tree  often  a 
height  of  190  feet  and  a  diameter  of  12  feet.  A  tree  of  Liriodendron 
Tulipifera  L.  having  a  diameter  of  11  feet  was  cut  down,  a  good  many 
years  ago,  about  one  mile  north  of  Bloomington,  Indiana.  It  divided 
into  two  large  branches  some  considerable  distance  above  the  ground 
and  probably  attained  a  height  of  175  feet.  Sargent'  states  that  this 
species  of  tree  may  sometimes  attain  a  height  of  200  feet. 

In  describing  Liriodendron  Tulipifera,  Wood'  says:  "Near  Bloom- 
ington, Indiana,  wq  measured  a  tree  of  this  species  which  had  been 
recently  felled.  Its  circumference  four  feet  from  the  ground  was  23 
feet;  80  feet  from  the  grround  its  dimension  was  five  feet;  the  whole 
height  was  125  feet.    The  trunk  was  perfect,  straight  and  cylindric." 

When  in  the  lumber  business  a  good  many  years  ago,  I  cut  into 
lumber  many  fine  specimens  of  this  species.  I  recall  one  specimen  which 
was  seven  feet  in  diameter  three  and  one-half  feet  from  the  ground. 
The  trunk  was  straight  and  was  free  of  all  branches  for  a  height  of 
90  feet,  where  it  was  three  feet  in  diameter.  Where  this  tree  was  cut 
oflP  three  and  one-half  feet  from  the  ground,  a  cavity  some  inches  in 
size  was  found  about  10  inches  from  the  circumference,  which  had  been 
chopped  out  many  years  before.  Evidently  the  party  who  had  chopped 
out  the  block  of  wood  concluded  that  it  would  not  split  easily  enough 
for  the  making  of  fence  rails,  which  was  a  necessary  occupation  in 
that  day.  The  wound  thus  made  had  grown  completely  over  in  the 
usual  manner  and  left  no  trace  of  its  existence  on  the  surface  of  the 
-trunk.  The  Fifteenth  Annual  Report  of  the  Indiana  Board  of  Forestry 
shows  on  page  107  a  partial  view  of  a  yellow  poplar  seven  feet  in 
diameter.    No  sawmills  exist  in  this  part  of  the  country  that  would  saw 

»  N.  L.  Britton  and  A.  Brown,  An  Illustrated  Flora  of  the  U.  S.  and  Canada.  1913. 
Second  Edition.  Vol.  II.  p.  63. 

3  C.  S.  Sargent,  Manual  of  the  Trees  of  North  America.  1905.  p.  326. 
^Alphonso  Wood.  Class  Book  of  Botany,  1868.  p.  215. 


(261) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


262        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

into  lumber  without  waste  such  log^s  as  those  of  Liriodendron  Tulipifera 
having  a  diameter  of  12  feet  as  given  by  Britton,*  or  even  a  diameter 
of  10  feet  as  given  for  this  tree  by  Sargent.'  Therefore,  in  order  to 
handle  these  large  logs,  they  were  often  split  or  quartered  by  bursting 
with  gninpowder,  so  that  they  could  be  handled  in  the  mill  on  the  saw- 
carriage.  The  large  double  saw  rigs  having  both  a  large  upper  and 
lower  circular  saw  would  lack  a  good  deal  of  being  able  to  handle  such 
sticks  of  timber  without  previous  reduction.  The  waste  even  then  and 
in  logs  of  moderate  size  is  great  when  it  is  remembered  that  the  ordi- 
nary gauge  of  sawmill  circular  saws  cut  away  one-fourth  of  an  inch 
of  timber  for  each  "line"  or  board  that  is  sawed.  Therefore,  in  logs 
12  feet  in  diameter  and  12  feet  long  a  large  amount  of  good  timber, 
if  the  log  is  sound,  will  be  cut  away  in  the  form  of  sawdust  and  wasted. 
In  proportion  smaller  log:s,  of  course,  lose  in  sawing.  Band  sawmills 
are  more  economical,  since  the  kerf  of  most  such  saws  is  usually  one- 
eighth  of  an  inch.  Trees  of  the  yellow  poplar  seven  feet  in  diameter 
are  now,  however,  rarely  found  in  Indiana,  and  no  specimen  11  feet  in 
diameter  now  exists.  The  scores  of  sawmills  in  Indiana  have  been  one 
large  agency  in  the  removal  of  the  timber.  Most  of  these  mills  are 
equipped  with  circular  saws  and  can  cut  from  a  few  hundreds  or  thou- 
sands of  feet  of  lumber,  daily  up  to  many  thousands  of  feet.  Since, 
however,  the  strain  on  a  circular  saw  is  considerable,  and  this  increases 
greatly  with  the  increase  in  velocity  of  the  "feed,"  a  large  circular 
sawmill  cannot  be  safely  operated  when  cutting  more  than  80,000  feet 
of  lumber  per  day.  Much  timber  is  now  being  cut  into  lumber  that 
thirty  or  forty  years  ago  would  have  been  rejected,  or  only  used  for 
fuel,  if  even  that.  A  band  sawmill,  besides  being  more  economical  as 
to  narrowness  of  kerf,  will  cut  more  lumber  per  day,  and  for  the  same 
capacity  requires  less  power  to  operate  than  the  circular  sawmill.  The 
large  "stationary  sawmill"  in  various  parts  of  the  country  use  "band" 
or  "gangsaws"  and  often  cut  hundreds  of  thousands  of  feet.  For  ex- 
ample, the  plant  of  the  Great  Southern  Lumber  Company,  Bogalusa, 
Louisiana,  has  the  largest  sawmill  in  the  world.  It  has  cut  1,018,000 
feet  of  lumber  in  a  single  day.'  With  such  factors  as  the  sawmill,  con- 
sumption for  railroad  ties,  etc.,  and  the  "proverbial  forest  fires,"  the 
forests  are  rapidly  disappearing. 

Near  Worthington,  Indiana,  stands  what  is  probably  the  largest  tree 
in  this  State.  It  is  Plantanus  occidentalis,  is  42  feet  3  inches  in  cir- 
cumference and  100  feet  high.     Wood*  also  says  of  this  species  that, 

*N.  L.  Britton  and  A.  Brown,  I.e. 

»C.  S.  SarKent.  I.e. 

'American  Forestry,   1018,  June,  Vol.  24.  p.  338. 

*  Wood.  Alphonso.  i.e.,  p.  640. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Some  Trees  of  Indiana.  263 

"Along  the  Western  rivers  trees  are  found  whose  trunks  measure  from 
40  to  50  feet  in  circumference."  Britton'  gives  it  a  diameter  of  14  feet, 
and  Gray*  gives  it  a  diameter  of  2  to  4.2  m.  and  calls  it  "our  largest 
tree."  A  partial  view  of  this  tree  is  given  in  the  Fifteenth  Annual 
Report  of  the  Indiana  State  Board  of  Forestry  for  1915,  page  109. 

In  my  yard  is  a  hickory,  Gary  ovata,  which  was  formerly  very  tall. 
It  is  about  three  feet  in  diameter  and  at  present  only  about  100  feet 
high.  Formerly  it  was  170  feet  high,  but  70  feet  of  the  top  has  been 
cut  off. 

There  are  still  a  number  of  areas  of  native  forests  containing  good- 
sized  trees  in  Indiana.  Among  these  may  be  mentioned  Turkey  Run.^ 
The  farm  of  Mr.  W.  L.  Jennings  near  Lexington,  Scott  Gounty,  Indiana.' 
This  farm  is  reported  to  have  100  acres  of  fine  forest.*  The  farm  now 
belonging  to  Indiana  University  near  Mitchell,  Indiana,  has  about  80 
acres  of  fine,  large  oak  and  poplar  and  some  other  kinds  of  trees.  But 
these  and  other  areas  still  exist  only  because  the  pony  sawmill,  the  pro- 
verbial forest  fire  ai^d  other  timber-devouring  agencies  have  been  thus 
far  kept  out. 

»  Britton.  I.e..  Vol.  2,  p.  242. 

^  Gray,  New  Manual  of  Botany.  7th  Edition,  p.  464. 
*  Fifteenth  Annual  Report  of  the  State  Board  of  Forestry,  1915. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


264        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


ASGDMYCETES  NEW  TO  THE  FLORA  OP  INDIANA.^ 


Bruce  Fink  and  Sylvia  C.  Fuson,  Miami  University,  Oxford,  Ohio. 


This  work  is  presented  as  a  contribution  to  a  knowledge  of  the 
ascomycetes  of  Indiana.  The  collecting  was  begnin  by  the  authors  in 
Union  County,  July  21,  1917,  and  most  of  the  collections  were  made 
during  August  and  September  of  the  same  summer  in  the  following 
counties:  Franklin,  Hendricks,  Montgomery,  Parke,  Tippecanoe,  and 
Union.  Thus  far,  about  six  hundred  and  twenty-five  specimens  have 
been  brought  together,  representing  thirty-eight  counties.  Of  this  num- 
ber, fifty-five  were  obtained  from  the  herbarium  of  Purdue  University 
and  about  the  same  number  from  the  herbarium  of  Wabash  College. 

It  is  the  intention  to  record  in  this  first  paper  a  list  of  the  ascomy- 
cetes found  which  have  not  been  published  previously  for  the  State. 
Of  these  there  are  about  one  hundred  and  forty,  including  two  new 
species.  A  second  paper,  which  is  to  follow,  will  consist  of  an  arrange- 
ment of  all  the  ascomycetes  now  known  to  Indiana. 

The  classification  used  in  this  paper  follows  that  initiated  by  Bruce 
Fink  in  "The  Ascomycetes  of  Ohio,"*  published  in  Bulletin  5  of  the 
Ohio  Biological  Survey,  June,  1915. 

Full  sets  of  the  species  are  preserved  in  the  herbaria  of  Bruce  Fink 
and  Sylvia  C.  Fuson,  and  a  partial  set  was  sent  to  the  herbarium  of 
Purdue  University. 

Unless  otherwise  stated,  all  collections  were  made  by  the  authors. 
Other  collectors  mentioned  are  H.  W.  Anderson,  J.  C.  Arthur,  F.  E. 
Bryant,  G.  W.  Clark,  Miss  Katherine  Longhead,  C.  P.  Orton,  J.  R- 
Schram,  Miss  Simonds,  and  M.  B.  Thomas. 

The  authors  are  under  obligations  to  the  following  persons  for  help 
in  collecting,  or  for  the  furnishing  of  facilities  for  collecting:  H.  W, 
Anderson,  J.  C.  Arthur,  J.  W.  Clokey,  A.  N.  Fuson,  Mrs.  A.  N.  Fuson, 
H.  S.  Jackson,  C.  A.  Ludwig,  D.  P.  Miller,  John  Miller,  L.  0.  Overholtz, 
George  A.  Ross,  J.  M.  Van  Hook,  and  Miss  Bemice  Wren.  We  are  also 
indebted  to  Dr.  E.  J.  Durand  and  to  Dr.  C.  L.  Shear  for  determining 
some  difficult  species. 

The  list  of  species  not  previously  reported  from  Indiana  follows. 

*  Contributions  from   the  Botanical   Laboratories  of  Miami   University — ^XV. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Ascomycetes  New  to  the  Flora  of  Indiana.  265 

PEZIZALES. 
Pezizaceae. 

Geopyxis  nebvXosa  (Cooke)   Sacc. 

On  rotten  logs  in  woods.    Parke,  Montgomery. 
Humaria  fusispora  Berk. 

On  moist  ground  in  grassy  wood.    Jasper  (Arthur  1903). 
Lachnea  setosa  (Nees)  Phill. 

On  old  stumps  in  wood.     Montgomery. 
Peziza  bronca  Peck. 

On  soil  in  open  wood.    Tippecanoe. 

ASCOBOLACEAE. 

AscoboltLs  atroficscus  Phill.  and  Plow. 

On  burnt  soil  in  open  wood.    Montgomery. 
Ascophanus  cameus  (Pers.)  Boud. 

On  sheep  dung  under  bell  jar.    Tippecanoe  (Arthur  1896). 
Ascophanus  testaceus  (Moug.)  Phill. 

On  old  sacking.    Tippecanoe  (Arthur  1903). 
Saccobolus  neglectus  Boud. 

On  cow  dung  in  open  pasture.    Montgfomery. 

Helotiaceae. 

Chlorosplenium  chlora  (L.  and  S.)  Mass. 

On  rotten  logs  in  woods.    Montgomery,  Parke,  Tippecanoe. 
Helotium  fratemum  Peck. 

On  petioles  in  low  wood.    Parke. 
Helotium  lutescens  Fries. 

On  old  log  in  Sayre's  wood.    Union. 
Lachnum  leucophaeum  (Pers.)  Karst. 

On  dead  pokeberry  stems  on  low,  open,  flood  plain.     Montgomery. 
Lanzia  helotioides  Rehm. 

On  old  log  in  low  wood.    Montgomery. 
PhicUea  scutula  (Pers.)  Gill. 

On  dead  balsam  and  other  decaying  stems  on  flood  plain  of  Sugar 
Creek.    Montgomery. 
Sclerotinia  tuberosa  (Hedw.)  Fuck. 

On  soil  in  wood.    Tippecanoe  (Reed). 

MOLLISIACEAE. 

Belonidium  minutissium  Fries. 

On  dead  tree  trunks  in  Sayre's  wood.    Union. 
Beloniella  dehnii  (Rabenh.)  Rehm. 

On  rough  cinquefoil.    Tippecanoe  (Orton  1911). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


266        Proceedings  of  Indmna  Academy  of  Science. 

Mollisia  cinerea  (Batsch)  Karst. 

On  decaying  logs  in  wood  at  Turkey  Run.    Parke. 
Orbilia  leucostigma  Fries. 

On  dry  sticks  in  woods.     Montgomery,  Parke,  Tippecanoe,  Union. 
Orbilia  vinosa  (Alb.  and  Schw.)   Karst. 

On  osage  orange  in  open  woods.     Montgomery,  Union. 
Tapesia  dnerella  Rehm. 

On  rotten  logs  in  woods.    Parke,  Tippecanoe,  Union. 

Cenangiaceae. 

Dermatea  carpinea  (Pers.)   Rehm. 

On  dead  tree  trunk  in  Sayre's  wood.    Union. 
Sarcosoma  rufa  (L.  and  S.)  Rehm. 

On  soil  in  Sayre's  wood.     Union. 

Patellariaceae.    . 

Karschia  fusispora  (Cooke  and  Peck)   Sacc. 

On  logs  in  wood.    Montgomery. 
Patellaria  atrata  (Hedw.)   Fries. 

On  log:s  in  wet,  open  woods.    Montgomery,  Tippecanoe. 

LECANORALES. 
Lecideaceae. 

Bacidia  inundUUa  (Fries)  Koerb. 

On  moist  bricks,  limestone,  and  other  rocks,  usually  in  woods.     Mon- 
roe, Montgomery,  Putnam,  Tippecanoe,  Union. 
Bacidia  rubella  (Hoffm.)  Mass. 

On  bark  of  willow  in  open  wood.    Tippecanoe. 
Bacidia  schweinitzii  (Tuck.)   Fink. 

On  bark  of  beech  in  Sayre's  wood.    Union. 
Buellia  myriocarpa  (Lam.  and  DC.)  Mudd. 

On  board  fences   and   telephone   poles   along  roadsides.     Franklin, 
Montgomery,  Union. 
Lecidea  coarctata  (J.  E.  Smith)  Nyl. 

On  bricks,  limestone,  and   other  moist  rocks  in  Crawford's  wood. 
Montgomery. 
Lecidea  enteroleuca  Ach. 

On  flat,  exposed  rocks  in  open  pasture.    Union. 
Lecidea  myrioca/rpoides  Nyl. 

On  rotten  stump  on  Indiana  University  Campus  wood.     Monroe. 
Lecidea  uliginosa  (Schrad.)  Ach. 

On  rotten  stumps  in  woods.    Hendricks,  Montgomery,  Union. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Ascomycetes  Neiv  to  the  Flora  of  Indiana,  267 

Cladoniaceae. 

Cladonia  baeUlaris  (Del.)   Nyl. 

On  stumps  in  open  pasture.    Hendricks. 
Cladonia  cariosa  (Ach.)   Spreng. 

On  soil  in  Crawford's  wood.    Montgomery. 
Cladonia  coniocraea  (Floerke)  Spreng. 

On  rail  fences  and  old  logs  in  woods.     Hendricks,  Montgomery,  Tip- 
pecanoe, Union. 
Cladonia  madlenta  Hoffm. 

On  rail  fences  and  old  logs  in  woods.  Montgomery,  Tippecanoe, 
Union. 

COLLEMACEAE. 

Leptogium  tremelloides  (L.)   S.  F.  Gray. 

On  shaded,  mossy  rocks  along  creek.    Montgomery. 

Pyrenopsidaceae. 

Pyrenopsis  fuscoatra  Fink  sp.  nov. 

Thallus  of  brown-black,  minute,  flat  or  convex,  usually  scattered, 
sometimes  disappearing  granules,  these  often  forming  a  more  or 
less  broken  crust;  apothecia  minute,  0.1  to  0.3  mm.  in  diameter, 
concolorous,  scattered  or  clustered,  hemispherical  or  flattened, 
pyrenocarpic  or  finally  more  or  less  open,  with  a  flesh  pink  to 
concolorous  disk;  hypothecium  pale  or  tinged  brown;  hymenium 
pale  below  and  brown  above;  asci  clavate  or  ventricose;  para- 
physes  slender,  hyaline,  distinct  to  coherent  semi-distinct,  brown 
tipped;  spores  simple,  hyaline,  oblong-ellipsoid,  13  to  22  mic.  long 
and  7  to  10  mic.  wide,  8  in  each  ascus. 

On  limestone  in  low,  moist,  open  fields.     Montgomery. 

Peltigeraceae. 

Peltigera  horizontalis  (L.)   Hoffm. 

On  rocks  at  The  Shades.    Montgomery. 
Peltigera  praetextata  (Sommerf.)   Fink  comb.  nov. 

On  limestone  rocks  in  wood.     Tippecanoe. 

ACAROSPORACEAE. 

Acarospora  cervina  (Wahl.)  Koerb. 

On  granite  boulders  in  open  pasture.    Montgomery. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


268        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Lecanoraceae. 

Leeanora  dispersa  (Pers.)  Floerke. 

On  chistose  and  granite  boulders  in  open  fields.     Franklin,   Mont- 
gomery, Union. 
Leeanora  hqgeni  Ach. 

On  fences,  old  stumps,  and  limestone  rocks.     Monroe,  Montgomery, 
Union. 
Leeanora  varia  (Hoffm.)   Ach. 

On  bark  of  hickory,  old  stumps,  and  picket  fences.    Hendricks,  Mont- 
gomery, Union. 

Pertusariaceae. 

Pertusaria  pustulata  (Ach.)  Nyl. 

On  apple  bark  in  Sayre's  wood.    Union. 

Parmeliaceae. 

Parmelia  ciliata  (Lam.  and  D.  C.)  Fink  comb.  nov. 

On  bark  of  sycamore  in  Sayre's  wood.     Union. 
Parmelia  eons^persa  (Ehrh.)  Ach. 

On  granite  boulders  in  Crawford's  wood.     Montgomery. 
Parmelia  rudecta  Ach. 

On  bark  in  woods.    Franklin,  Hendricks,  Montgomery,  Parke,  Tipi>e- 
canoe.  Union. 

Usneaceae. 

Ramalina  fraxinea  (L.)   Ach. 

On  fence  posts  in  open  country.     Union. 

Teloschistaceae. 

Placodium  aurellum  (HoflPm.)  Fink  comb.  nov. 

On  limestone  and  on  sandstone  conglomerate.     Montgomery,  Union. 
Placodium  microphyllinum  Tuck. 

On  board  and  rail  fences.    Montgomery,  Union. 
Placodium  pyraceum  (Ach.)   Fink. 

On  dead  roots  in  open  pasture.     Montgomery. 
Placodium  sideritis  (Tuck.)   Fink  comb.  nov. 

On  limestone  boulders  in  open  woods.     Franklin,  Montgomery,  Put- 
nam. 
Placodium  ulmx>rum  Fink  comb.  nov. 

On  bark  in  wood.     Tippecanoe. 
Placodium.  variaJbile  (Pers.)  Nyl. 

On  exposed  limestone  boulder  on  open  hillside.     Franklin. 
Teloschistes  lychneus  (Ach.)   Tuck. 

On  maple  bark  in  open  field  along  road.    Montgomery. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Ascomycetes  New  to  the  Flora  of  Indiana.  269 

Physciaceae. 

Physcia  aquila  (Ach.)  Nyl. 

On  bark  in  woods.     Montgomery. 
Physcia  dstroidea  (Fries)  Nyl. 

On  walnut  bark  in  woods.     Franklin,  Montgfomery. 
Physcia  endochrysea  (Hampe)  Nyl. 

On  bark  and  rocks  in  woods.     Hendricks,  Montgomery,  Tippecanoe. 
Physcia  leucoleiptes  (Tuck.)  Fink  comb.  nov. 

On  bark  in  woods  and  along  roadsides.     Franklin,  Monroe,  Mont- 
gomery. 
Physcia  obscura  (Schaer.)  Nyl. 

On  bark  in  woods  and  along  open  roadsides.    Franklin,  Montgomery, 
Union. 
Physcia  piUverulenta  (Schreb.)   Nyl. 

On  stumps,  tree  trunks,  and  paling  fences.     Franklin,  Montgomery, 
Union. 
Physcia  tribacia  (Ach.)   Nyl. 

On  old  posts  and  on  bark,  usually  toward  base  of  trees,  in  woods. 
Hendricks,  Montgomery,  Parke,  Union. 
Pyxine  sorediata  (Ach.)  Fries. 

On  old  logs  in  wood  along  creek.    Montgomery. 
Rinodina  lecanorina  Mass. 

On  homblend  granite  in  Crawford's  wood.     Montgomery. 

HELVELLALES. 

Geoglossaceae. 

Leotia  stipitata  (Bosc.)  Schrot. 

On  grassy  place  in  open  wood.    Montgomery. 

Helvellaceae. 

Helvetia  crispa  (Scop.)   Fries. 

On  ground  in  grassy  wood.    Montgomery. 
Helvetia  sulcata  (SchaflP.)  Afz. 

On  open  hillside  along  road.    Montgomery. 

PHACIDIALES. 
Stictidiaceae. 
Stictis  radiata  (L.)  Pers. 

On  dead  stems  of  pokeberry  on  low,  open,  flood  plain  of  Sug^r  Creek. 
Montgomery. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


270        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

HYSTERIALES. 
Hysteriaceae. 

Gloniopsis  gerarcUana  Sacc. 

On  old  limbs  in  Crawford's  wood.    Montgomery. 
Gloniopsis  lineolata  (Cooke)   Sacc. 

On  rail  fence  along  roadside.    Hendricks. 
Glontum  linea/re  (Fries)  Sacc. 

On  sycamore  bark  in  open  pasture.     Union. 
Glonium  nitidum  Ell. 

On  exposed  logs  in  open  wood.     Montgomery  (Miller). 
Glonium  stellatum  Muhl. 

On  old  logs  in  wood.    Montgomery  (Anderson). 
Hysterium  insidens  Schw. 

On  rail  fence  in  woods.    Hendricks,  Montgomery. 
Hysterographium  cinertiscens  Schw. 

On  fallen  tree.    Montgomery. 
Hysterographium  lesquereauxii  (Duby)   Ell.  and  Ev, 

On  old  logs  in  wood.    Union. 
Hysterographium  rousselii  De  Not. 

On  exposed  paling  in  open  wood  along  road.     Montgfomery. 
Hysterographium  vaHabile  Cooke  and  Peck. 

On  decorticate  wood,  rails,  and  fence  posts,  in  woods,    Montgomery, 
Parke,  Tippecanoe.  , 

Graphidaceae. 
Opegrapha  varia  Pers. 

On  bark  in  woods.    Parke,  Tippecanoe. 

Arthoniaceae. 

Arthonia  dispersa  (Lam.  and  DC.)   Duf. 

On  maple  bark  in  woods.    Montgomery,  Union. 
Arthonia  leddeella  Nyl. 

On  bark,  usually  in  woods.     Hendricks,  Montgomery,  Parke,  Tippe- 
canoe, Union. 
Arthonia  radiata  (Pers.)  Ach. 

On  basswood  bark  in  low  wood.    Tippecanoe. 

HYPOCREALES. 
Hypocreaceae. 

Chromocrea  gelatinosa  (Tode)   Seaver. 

On  old  log  in  wood  at  Turkey  Run.    Parke. 
Hypocrea  lenta  (Tode)  Berk,  and  Br. 

On  exposed  logs  along  border  of  wood.     Montgomery. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Ascomycetes  New  to  the  Flora  of  Indiana.  271 

Hypocrea  aulphurea  (Schw.)   Sacc. 

On  Exidia  over  decorticate  wood  in  Sayre's  wood.    Union. 
Nectria  episphaeria  (Tode)   Fries. 

On  osage  orange  bark  in  open  field  along  Sugar  Creek.    Montgomery. 
Nectria  sanguinea  Fries. 

On  dead  stems  of  common  ragn^eed  on  low  ground  near  Sugar  Creek. 
Montgomery. 

DOTHIDIALES. 

DOTHIDIACEAE. 

Dothidea  glumarum  Berk,  and  Curt. 

On  couch-grass  in  wood.    Montgomery  (Thomas  1893). 
Phyllachora  potentillae  Peck. 

On  cinquefoil  in  wood.    Montgomery  (Thomas  1893,  1913). 

SPHAERIALES. 

Chaetomiaceae. 

Chaetomium  bostrychodes  Zopf. 

On  sheep  dung  in  pasture.    Tippecanoe  (Arthur  1896). 

SORDARIACEAE. 

Sporormia  minima  Auersw. 

On  cow  dung  in  open  pasture.    Montgomery. 

Sphaeriaceae. 

La^siosphaeria  hirsuta  (Fries)  Ces.  and  De  Not, 

On  decaying  logs  in  wood  at  Turkey  Run.     Parke. 
Lasiosphaeria  kispida  (Tode)   Fuck. 

On  old  wood  along  dry  branch.    Montgomery. 
LaMosphaeria  ovina  (Pers.)   Ces.  and  De  Not. 

On  old  logs  in  Sayre's  wood.     Union. 
Leptosphaeria  borealis  Ell.  and  Ev. 

On  ash  in  wood  along  creek.    Montgomery. 
Leptosphaeria  doliolum  (Pers.)  Ces.  and  De  Not. 

On  old  aster  stems  in  low,  open  field,    Montgomery. 
Leptosphaeria  dumentorum  Niessl. 

On  stems  of  giant  ragweed  and  mint  in  open  field  near  Sugar  Creek. 
Montgomery. 
Leptosphaeria  subacuta  (Cooke  and  Peck)  Sacc. 

On  stems  of  giant  rag^veed  in  low,  open  field.    Montgomery. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


272        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Leptosphaeria  subconica  (Cooke  and  Peck)   Sacc. 

On  dead  stems  of  actinomeris  in  low,  open  field  near  creek.    Mont- 
gomery. 
Teichospora  ohducens  (Fries)  Fuck. 

On  ash  bark  in  open  wood.    Union. 
Trichosphaeria  pilosa  (Pers.)  Fuck. 

On  old  sticks  in  wood.    Montgomery. 

Ceratostomaceae. 

Ceratostomella  barbarostra  (Duf.)  Sacc. 

On  maple  bark  on  Indiana  University  Campus.    Monroe. 

Amphisphaeriaceae. 

Amphisphaera  incmstans  Ell.  and  Ev. 

On  old  wood  in  open  pasture.    Montgomery. 

Pleosporaceae. 

Ophioboltis  acuminatus  (Sow.)  Duby. 

On  dead  grape  stems  in  low,  open  field.     Montgomery. 
Opkiobolus  anguillides  (Cooke)   Sacc. 

On  dead  stems  of  giant  ragweed  in  low  field.    Montgomery. 
Opkiobolus  solidaginis  (Fries)  Sacc. 

On  dead  stems  of  giant  ragweed  in  low  ground  near  Sugar  Creek. 
Montgomery. 

Valsaceae. 

Diaporthe  albocamis  Ell.  and  Ev. 

On  dead  twigs  in  wood.    Montgomery.     (Anderson.) 
Diaporthe  orihoceras  (Fries)  Nits. 

On  dead  stems  of  actinomeris  in  open  ground.    Montgomery. 
Eutypa  ludibrunda  Sacc. 

Old  wood  along  roadside.    Montgomery. 
Eutypella  cerviculata  (Fries)   Ell.  and  Ev. 

On  log  in  wood.    Tippecanoe. 

Diatrypaceae. 

Diatrype  asterostoma  Bock,  and  Curt. 

On  beech  twigs  in  open  pasture.     Union. 

Melogrammataceae. 

Botryosphaeria  sumachi  (Schw.)  Cooke. 

On  sumach  bark  in  open,  flood  plain.    Montgomery. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Ascomycetes  New  to  the  Flora  of  Indiana,  273 

Xylariaceae. 
Hypoxylon  insidens  Schw. 

On  exposed  board  in  wood.    Montgomery. 
Hypoxylon  stigmateum  Cooke. 

On  hickory  log  in  woods.    Montgomery,  Union. 
Xylaria  digitata  (L.)  Grev. 

On  old  log  in  wood.     Montgomery. 

PYRENULALES. 

Verrucariaceae. 

Verrucaria  epigea  (Pers.)  Ach. 

On  exposed  soil  in  Sayre's  wood.     Union. 
Verrucaria  mura^is  Ach. 

On   exposed  bricks,   sandstone,   and   limestone   boulders.     Franklin, 
Monroe,  Montgomery,  Putnam. 
Verrucarna  nigrescens  Pers. 

On  exposed  limestone  boulders  in  open  field.     Montgomery,  Putnam, 
Tippecanoe. 
Verrucaria  rupestris  Schrad. 

On  exposed  sandstone  in  open  wood  along  road.    Montgomery. 
Verrucaria  sordida  Fink  sp.  no  v. 

Thallus  partly  hypolithic,  the  epilithic  portion  thin,  sordid,  rough- 
ened, clinky-areolate,  the  poorly  defined  areoles  minute,  0.2  to 
0.5  mm.  across;  apothecia  numerous,  concolorous  or  darker, 
minutfe,  0.15  to  0.25  mm.  across,  semi-immersed,  dimidiate,  the 
superficial  portion  subconical  and  surmounted  by  a  minute  and 
obscure  ostiole;  hypothecium  and  hymenium  pale;  paraphyses 
gelatinizing  and  disappearing  early;  asci  clavate,  becoming  dis- 
tended and  variously  shaped;  spores  simple,  hyaline,  oblong- 
ellipsoid,  16  to  22  mic.  long  and  9  to  12  mic.  wide,  8  in  each  ascus. 
On  limestone  boulders  along  dry  run.  Montgfomery. 
Verrucaria  viridula  Ach. 

On  rock  on  north  side  of  barn.     Montgomery. 

Pyrenulaceae. 

Pyrenula  cinerella  (Flot.)   Fink. 

On  cultivated  cherry  bark  in  Sayre's  wood.     Union. 
Pyrenula  leucoplaca  (Wallr.)  Karst. 

On  beech  bark  in  wood  at  Turkey  Run.    Parke. 
Pyrenula  nitida  (Weig.)  Ach. 

On  bark  in  wood  at  Turkey  Run.     Parke. 

18—16568 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


274        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 

Dermatocarpaceae. 

Endocarpon  pusillium  Hedw. 

On  limestone  and  granite  boulders  in  woods,    Franklin,  Montgomery, 
Union. 
Thelocarpon  prasinellum  Nyl. 

On  board  along  Sayre's  wood.    Union. 

Trypetheliaceae. 
Trypethelium  virens  Tuck. 

On  beech  bark  in  wood.    Tippecanoe. 

PERISPORIALES. 
Erysibaceae. 

Microsphaera  euonymi  (DC.)  Sacc. 

On  cultivated  spindle  tree.    Tippecanoe  (Orton). 
Sphaerotheca  humuli  fuliginea  (Schlecht.)   Salm. 

On  tamarix  and  heal-all  on  low  ground.    Montgfomery. 

ASPERGILLALES. 

ASPERGILLACEAE. 
Penicillium  crustaceum  L. 

On  canned  fruit.    Tippecanoe  (Simonds  1906). 

EXOASCALES. 

EXOASCACEAE. 

Exoascus  mirabilis  Atkins. 

On  wild  plums.    Jefferson  (Clark  1898),  Orange  (1909). 
Taphrina  caenUescens  (Mont.)  Tul. 

On  scarlet  oak  in  wood.    Montgomery  (Thomas  1893). 
Taphrina  potentUlae  (Farl.)  John. 

On  cinquefoil  (Potentilla  canadensis),    Vigo  (Arthur). 

Bibliography. 

Haines,  Mary  P.  List  of  ferns,  mosses,  hepaticae,  and  lichens  collected 
in  Wayne  County.    Ind.  Geol.  Surv.    1879:     235-239.    1879. 

Ludwig,  C.  A.  Fungous  enemies  of  the  sweet  potato  in  Indiana.  Proc. 
Ind.  Acad.  Sci.    1912:     103,  104.    1912. 

O'Neal,  Claude  E.  Some  species  of  NummtUaria  common  in  Indiana. 
Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.    1914:    235-241.    1914. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Ascomycetes  New  to  the  Flora  of  Indiana.  275 

Osner,  Geo.  A.     List  of  plant  diseases.     Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.     1916: 
•      327-332.    1916. 
Osner,  Geo.  A.    List  of  plant  diseases.    Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.    1917:    145- 

147.    1917. 
Owens,  Charles  E.     A  monograph  of  the  common  Indiana  species  of 

Hypoxylon.    Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.     1911:    291-308.    1911. 
Pipal,  F.  J.    List  of  plant  diseases.    Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.    1915:    379- 

397.    1915. 
Ramsey,  Glen  B.    The  genus  Rosellinia  in  Indiana.    Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci. 

1914:    251-259.    1914. 
Rose,  J.  N.    The  mildews  of  Indiana.    Bot.  Gaz.  11:    60-63.    1886. 
Underwood,  L.  M.    List  of  cryptogams  at  present  known  to  inhabit  the 

State  of  Indiana.    Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.    1893:    30-67.    1893. 
Underwood,  L.  M.    Report  of  the  botanical  division  of  the  Indiana  state 

geological  survey  for  1894.     Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.     1894:     144-156. 

1894. 
Van  Hook,  J.  M.    Indiana  fungi.    Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.    1910:    205-212. 

1910. 
Van  Hook,  J.  M.    Indiana  fungi  II.    Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.    1911:     347- 

354.    1911. 
Van  Hook,  J.  M.    Indiana  fungi  III.    Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.    1912:    99- 

101.    1912. 
Van  Hook,  J.  M.    Indiana  fungi  III.    Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.    1915:     141- 

146.    1915. 
Wilson,  Guy.     Flora  of  Hamilton  and  Marion  counties,  Indiana.     Proc. 

Ind.  Acad.  Sci.    1894:     156-176.    1894. 

Note:  The  following  papers  are  said  to  have  been  read  before  the 
Indiana  Academy  of  Science,  but  we  have  been  unable  to  obtain  either 
of  them: 

Brannon,  M.  A.     Some  Indiana  mildews.     Read  in  1887.     Never  pub- 
lished. 
Evans,  W.  H.     Lichens  of  Indiana,  1887.     Said  to  have  been  published. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


276        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


The  Dormant  Period  of  Timothy  Seed  Ater  Harvesting. 


M.  L.  Fisher,  Purdue  University. 


The  suggestion  for  this  study  came  in  August,  1916,  through  a 
request  from  the  Illinois  Seed  Company,  Chicago,  Illinois,  asking  for 
data  as  to  the  length  of  time  after  harvesting  until  timothy  seed  reached 
its  maximum  germinating  power.  No  such  data  were  at  hand  and  a 
very  careful  search  of  all  the  available  literature  revealed  but  one  men- 
tion of  any  previous  work  on  the  subject.  In  Fuhling's  Landwirth- 
schaftliche  Zeitung  for  March  15,  1894,  there  was  reported  such  a  study 
of  several  different  kinds  of  seeds,  and  from  that  study  a  conclusion  had 
been  drawn  that  timothy  seed  reaches  its  maximum  germinating  percent 
in  four  weeks  after  harvest. 

At  the  time  of  receiving  the  above  inquiry  it  was  too  late  to  make 
an  investigation  for  the  season  of  1916.  In  the  season  of  1917  an  inves- 
tigation was  begun.  Heads  of  timothy  were  harvested  from  a  lot  back 
of  the  Agricultural  Building  at  Purdue  University.  It  was  decided  to, 
make  the  study  in  two  parts. 

1.  A  study  of  the  germinating  qualities  of  individual  heads  was 
made  to  see  if  there  was  such  a  thing  as  individuality  in  heads. 

2.  A  number  of  heads  were  shelled  together  for  a  mass  selection  and 
this  was  used  in  duplicate.  The  shelled  seed  was  allowed  to  stand  in  an 
open  pan  in  the  laboratory.  The  timothy  heads  were  not  ripe  enough 
to  shatter  from  the  spikes,  but  were  easily  shelled.  The  culms  below 
the  spikes  were  still  green.  The  heads  were  harvested  August  11th, 
and  the  first  tests  set  at  once.  The  second  test  was  set  August  20th, 
and  the  third  test  September  5th.  For  the  individual  head  testing,  five 
heads  were  selected.  A  small  amount  of  seed  was  shelled  from  the  base 
of  the  spikes  and  one  hundred  seeds  (more  or  less  accurately)  counted 
out  for  testing.  For  the  mass  tests  duplicate  lots  of  one  hundred  seeds 
(more  or  less  accurately  counted)  were  taken.  The  seeds  were  tested 
on  blotters  in  moist  chambers  formed  by  turning  one  plate  over  another. 
The  following  tables  show  the  results  of  these  tests: 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


3 
? 


1 

I*: 

8 

s 

II 

s 

oa 

•      <-! 

« 

4 

CO 

g 

s 

e« 

«D 

•o 

■c 

^ 



•C 

s 

_s 

s 

C4 

i 

M 

3 

ss 

^o 

-g 

s 

ii 

•o 

s 

sg 

5S 

"<•« 

'S* 

•-4 

00 

U9 

l^ 

00 

Si 

s 

s 

II 

^ 

55 

e>« 

3 

:l| 

r* 

5 

s 

w 

r- 

eo 

1 

1     w 

6^ 

t 

s 

$ 

s 

11 

s 

M 

o 

l^ 

4 

S8 

s 

s 

w 

o> 

^^ 

00 

,^ 

00 

!? 

1 

M 

•*!• 

» 

«^ 

13 

s 

-s 

s^ 

s 

ij 

^ 

s 

§ 

5! 

M 

Ifl 

o 

cj 

i;*^ 

s 

s 

s 

•♦ 

II 

g 

«s 

• 

^ 

^J 

^ 

5 

s 

CI 

r>- 

1^ 

'S* 

B^ 

S5 

2§ 

s 

g 

i 

II 
^1 

3 
^ 

^ 

oo 

s 

CO 

111 

S 

S 

CO 

s 

s 

ii 

1 

ok 

t 

3 

1 

J 

i 

i 

8 

1 

111 

pa 

(277^ 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


278        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


TABLE  II— SuMMART  OF  Tail*  I. 


Series  I 

From  harvest. 

days— none. 

Series  II 

From  harvest, 

days— 10 

Series  III 

From  harvest. 

day8-25 

Hard  seed  from 

Series  I 
From  harvest. 
day»— 31,  plus 

first  test 

Hard  seed  from 
Series  II 

From  harvest. 

days-50.phis 
first  test 

% 

% 

%      1      % 

% 

% 

% 

% 

Head  1... 

27.7 

58.7      

96.0 

90.7 

Head  2. . . 

26.2 

46.5    1 

99.0 

48.5 

Heads... 

28.0 

41.0    i 

98.0 

84.4 

Head  4... 

3».7 

88.3 



100.0 

91.2 



Head  5. . . 

18.4 

53.1 

98. 

85.4 



Massl.... 

6.6 

1    «•* 

88 

78.8 

Maa8  2. ... 

3.2 

1    80.0' 

88 

1 

Ave 

28.0 

4.4 

57.5     1    72.2 

1 

98.2 

88 

78.8 

80.3 

In  Table  1  are  given  the  detailed  results  obtained  from  the  individual 
heads  and  from  the  duplicates  in  the  mass  tests.  In  Series  I  it  is  to  be 
observed  that  in  every  case  there  was  a  large  percentage  of  hard  seed. 
After  the  first  five  days,  or  first  count,  very  few  seed  germinated.  The 
majority  of  the  seed  that  germinated  did  so  during  the  first  five  days. 
After  twenty-four  days  had  passed  and  no  germination  had  taken  place 
for  several  days  this  series  was  broken  up.  However,  upon  a  second 
thought  it  was  decided  to  see  what  effect  letting  these  seed  dry  out  and 
then  retesting  would  have.  The  hard  seed  from  one  of  the  mass  tests 
was  used  for  this  purpose,  and  the  table  shows  that  60.5%  of  the  hard 
seed  germinated.  However,  after  a  period  of  seventeen  days  no  more 
seed  would  germinate  in  this  lot.  In  Series  II  it  was  decided  to  try  out 
the  hard  seed  from  all  of  the  tests  by  first  letting  them  dry  out  on  the 
pads.  The  data  in  the  table  show  the  results  of  these  tests.  In  Series  III 
there  was  so  small  a  percentage  of  hard  seed  that  it  was  not  deemed 
necessary  to  retest.  In  Table  2  is  shown  the  summarized  results  of  the 
tests.  From  the  data  presented  above  we  may  make  the  following 
observations : 

1.  Immediately  after  harvesting  only  a  very  small  percentage  of 
germination  may  be  expected  from  timothy  seed.  In  the  case  of  the 
individual  heads  tested,  an  average  of  28  percent  was  obtained,  while  in 
the  mass  selections  only  an  average  of  4.4  percent  was  obtained.  In 
ten  days  after  harvesting  the  individual  heads  had  practically  doubled 
their  germinating  power,  averaging  57.5  percent.  The  mass  selections 
had  very  greatly  improved,  averaging  72.2  percent.    In  twenty-five  days 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Dormant  Period  of  Timothy  Seed.  279 

after  harvesting  the  individual  heads  had  practically  reached  their 
maximum  percent,  averaging  98.29^,  while  the  mass  selections  had 
reached  a  satisfactory  germinating  percentage — 88%  (U.  S.  Gov.  stand- 
ard being  85-90  percent).     (Yr.  Bk.  U.S.  D.  A.  1896,  p.  623.) 

2.  Alternate  drying  and  wetting  increases  the  germinating  percent- 
age. However,  where  seed  was  kept  wet  throughout  the  period  no 
further  germination  took  place  in  the  hard  seeds. 

3.  The  testing  of  the  five  individual  heads  showed  that  there  is  some 
variation  in  the  germinating  quality  of  the  single  heads,  as  illustrated 
by  head  No.  4  in  the  test. 

4.  The  individual  heads  reached  a  higher  percentage  of  germination 
than  the  mass  selections.  Possibly  this  was  due  to  the  fact  that  in 
individual  heads  the  seed  remained  attached  to  the  spikes  until  shelled 
off  for  testing,  while  in  the  case  of  mass  selections  the  seed  was  shelled 
off  of  the  spikes  as  soon  as  harvested.  The  first  condition  is  the  one 
which  would  prevail  under  farm  practice. 

5.  Seed  alternately  wetted  and  dried  will  eventually  reach  a  high 
percentage  of  germination. 

6.  It  seems  reasonable  to  conclude  from  the  data  obtained  that  be- 
tween three  and  four  weeks  from  the  time  of  harvesting  is  necessary 
for  timothy  seed  to  reach  its  maximum  germinating  power. 

7.  If  timothy  seed  which  has  been  harvested  and  threshed  before  it 
has  reached  its  maximum  germinating  power  is  kept  from  heating  and 
sown  at  once  it  would  eventually  give  a  fair  stand  of  plants. 

BiBLIOCRAPHY. 

Fiihling's  Landwirthschaftliche  Zeitung,  March  15,  1894. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


280        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes  of  Northwestern  Indiana. 


C.  W.  G.  EiFRiG,  Oak  Park,  Illinois. 


The  region  covered  by  this  list  is  not  the  entire  area  of  sand  dunes 
in  Lake  and  Porter  counties,  but  is  the  "Dunes"  in  the  narrower  sense, 
i.  e.,  the  strip  of  dune  country  immediately  adjoining  the  south  end  of 
Lake  Michigan  to  a  width  of  from  one  to  two  miles,  extending  from 
Gary  to  Michigan  City,  a  distance  of  about  twenty-five  miles.  This  is 
an  immensely  interesting  region  to  nature  lovers  and  students  of  various 
branches  of  natural  history  or  science.  It  is  interesting  to  the  physiog- 
rapher, g:eologist  and  geographer,  as  here  may  be  seen  the  destructive 
as  well  as  the  constructive  forces  of  nature  actually  at  work.  It  is  a 
perfect  Eldorado  to  the  zoologist,  especially  those  devoted  to  the  study 
of  ornithology  and  entomology,  as  well  as  the  botanist.  And  in  few 
other  regions  can  studies  in  ecology  be  carried  on  as  well  as  here.  All 
of  this  needs  no  further  elucidation  in  this  connection.  Most  phases  of 
it  have  been  written  upon,  as,  e.  g.,  by  Prof.  W.  S.  Blatchley  and  Mr. 
A.  W.  Butler  in  the  twenty-second  annual  report  of  the  Indiana  Depart- 
ment of  Geology  and  Natural  Resources  for  1897;  by  Dr.  H.  C.  Cowles, 
in  his  "Plant  Societies  of  Chicago  and  Vicinity";  by  R.  D.  Salisbury, 
in  "The  Geography  of  Chicago  and  Its  Environs";  by  V.  E.  Shelf ord, 
in  his  "Animal  Communities";  and  others.  There  is  also  a  well- written 
account  of  the  Dunes  by  Mr.  A.  F.  Knotts  of  Gary  in  the  Indiana  geo- 
logical report  for  1916.  Lately,  artistically  gotten-up  books  on  the 
Dunes  are  beginning  to  appear,  as  "The  Sand  Dunes  of  Indiana,"  by 
E.  S.  Bailey;  "The  Dune  Country,"  by  E.  H.  Reed,  and  others. 

Since  the  publication  of  Mr.  Butler's  "Birds  of  Indiana"  in  the  1897 
report,  which  is  one  of  the  best  if  not  the  best  state  list  of  birds  known 
to  the  writer,  little  has  been  published  on  the  avifauna  of  the  Dunes. 
Some  short  notes  have  been  published  on  certain  rare  species  here  by 
Mr.  H.  L.  Stoddard,  of  the  Harris  Public  School  Extension  of  Field 
Museum,  who  has  spent  much  time  in  the  Dunes  in  connection  with  his 
work.    The  notes  are  to  be  found  in  the  "Auk,"  Vols.  33  and  34. 

The  writer's  idea  in  compiling  this  list  is  not  so  much  to  quote  old 
records,  but  to  give  the  present  status  of  the  avifauna  of  this  section. 
He  has  spent  many  days  in  the  Dunes,  in  every  month  of  the  year,  and 
has  also  accumulated  material  from  the  observations  of  members  of  the 
Chicago  Ornithological  Society,  many  of  whom  also  go  to  the  Dunes  as 
often  as  they  can.    As  an  example  of  what  may  be  seen  here,  at  a  time 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


'^  The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes.  281 

when  very  little  of  interest  can  usually  be  seen  in  most  places  in  this 
latitude,  I  quote  the  species  I  saw  during  my  last  three  visits  to  the 
Dunes,  on  November  30th,  December  21st  and  27th,  1918,  namely. 
Evening  Grossbeaks,  Pine  Grossbeaks,  Tufted  Titmouse,  Red-breasted 
Mergansers,  Hooded  Mergansers,  Herring  Gulls,  Red-headed  Woodpeck- 
ers, Chickadees,  Blue  Jays,  Tree  Sparrows,  Juncos,  Cardinals,  White- 
breasted  Nuthatches,  Redpolls,  Downy  Woodpeckers,  and  Crows.  Any- 
one familiar  with  bird  conditions  will  see  how  difficult  it  would  be  to 
duplicate  this  list  in  most  places.  The  writer  deplores  his  lack  of  time 
to  enter  into  the  subject  more  fully,  and*  hopes  to  be  able  to  do  so  at 
some  future  time.  In  the  meantime,  everyone  able  to  do  so  ought  to 
lend  his  aid  to  the  proposal  to  make  a  part  of  this  alluring  regiocn  a 
national  park.  Let  it  remain  a  monument  of  nature  and  a  high  school 
of  and  in  nature  forever! 

Order  Pygopodes:    Diving  Birds. 

1.  Colynibus  aurittiSy  Horned  Grebe.  A  none  too  common  migrant, 
especially  in  spring,  and  one  may  now  and  then  breed  in  Long  Lake, 
near  Millers,  or  some  others  of  the  larger  and  not  too  accessible  lakes 
that  are  between  the  dunes  or  along  the  southern  end  of  them.  They 
are  seen  on  Lake  Michigan  in  April,  and  several  have  been  seen  or 
taken  on  Long  Lake,  April  3rd,  15th  and  21st,  1916,  and  April  25th 
and  May  5th,  1917. 

2.  PodilymhtL8  podiceps.  Pied-billed  Grebe.  A  common  migrant  and 
breeding  species,  nearly  every  pond  or  lake  harboring  one  or  several 
pairs.  Late  records  are:  April  1,  1916;  June  2  and  6,  1916,  nests  with 
four  to  seven  eggs  found  in  Long  Lake;  July  18,  1911,  family  of  old 
with  young. 

No  doubt,  if  a  competent  observer  would  stay  here  throughout  at 
least  one  whole  year  and  patrol  the  beach  daily,  he  would  also  see  Hol- 
boell's  Grebe  and  the  Eared  Grebe,  but  the  writer  knows  of  no  late 
records. 

3.  Gavia  immer,  Loon.  Formerly,  no  doubt,  a  common  breeder  here, 
but  is  so  no  longer.  This  shy  bird  does  not  stay  where  the  genus  homo 
becomes  abundant,  as  is  now  the  case  in  the  Dunes,  but  it  still  tarries 
here  in  migration.  April  1,  1915,  one  swam  about,  a  short  distance  from 
shore,  at  Tremont. 

What  has  been  said  in  the  case  of  the  Grebes  undoubtedly  holds  good 
for  the  Loons,  too.  The  Red-throated  Loon  would  probably  also  be  seen 
by  continuous  observation.  And  this  is  still  more  true  of  the  species  of 
the  next  order,  the  Longipennes.  Nearly  all  the  far  northern  Jaegers, 
Gulls  and  Terns  probably  put  in  an  appearance  here,  especially  in  long, 
severe  winters  and  after  strong  northerly  gales,  but  it  takes  more  than 
ordinary  fortitude  to  be  out  on  the  lake  shore  then. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


282        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Order  Longipennes:    Long-wing«d  Swimmers. 

4.  Stercorarius  longicaudus,  Long-tailed  Jaeger.  This  is  an  instance 
of  what  painstaking  search  may  reveal.  Mr.  H.  L.  Stoddard  shot  a  fine 
male  of  this  species  at  Dune  Park,  September  21,  1915.  Mr.  F.  M. 
Woodruff,  of  the  Chicago  Academy  of  Science,  mentioned  several  other 
occurrences  of  this  boreal  species  to  me. 

5.  Larus  hyperboreas,  Glaucous  Gull.  One  was  shot  at  Millers, 
August  8,  1897,  which  is  in  Mr.  Woodruff's  collection. 

6.  Larus  argentatus,  Herring  Gull.  An  abundant  winter  resident, 
and  a  few,  probably  unmated  individuals  may  be  seen  even  in  summer. 
April  24,  1915,  there  were  many  over  the  lake  at  Tremont;  August  30, 
1916;  about  ten  at  Millers.  At  the  latter  place,  where  there  is  a  fisher- 
men's colony  on  the  beach,  it  is  one  of  the  common  sights  to  see  one 
perched  on  the  top  of  every  post  in  the  lake  and  numerous  others  flying 
about. 

7.  Larus  delawarensis.  Ring-billed  Gull.  Almost  as  abundant  as  the 
preceding  species,  some  days  even  predominating  in  numbers.  A  female 
was  taken  as  early  as  August  3,  1915.  Often  flies  up  close  to  the  walker 
along  the  beach,  as  if  to  inspect  him. 

8.  Larus  Philadelphia,  Bonaparte's  Gull.  Although  this  is  next  to 
the  Herring  and  Ring-billed  Gulls  the  commonest  of  the  migrating  gulls 
on  Chicago  River  and  off  the  lake  shore  at  the  parks,  we  do  not  see  it 
nearly  so  often  as  the  two  other  gulls  at  the  south  end  of  the  lake. 
Probably  we  have  just  missed  the  days  of  their  abundance.  May  10, 
1917,  I  saw  about  ten  flying  about  in  the  harbor  of  Michigan  City. 

9.  Sterna  ca^pia,  Caspian  Tern.  This  now  turns  out  to  be  a  rather 
regular  and  not  uncommon  migrant  here.  In  late  August  and  early 
September  as  high**  as  twenty  have  been  seen  at  one  time  over  the  lake 
at  Mineral  Springs.  Stoddard  took  specimens  August  30,  1914,  and 
September  4,  1915.     I  saw  one  at  Millers  August  30,  1916. 

10.  Sterna  forsteri,  Foster's  Tern.  An  abundant  migrant,  at  about 
the  same  time  as  the  preceding  species.  August  30,  1916,  a  flock  of 
about  two  hundred  were  fishing  parallel  to  the  water  line  near  Millers, 
two  or  three  rods  from  shore,  where  they  were  continually  diving  from 
about  twenty  feet  above  the  water  into  the  schools  of  minnows  in  the 
shallow  water  below,  making  as  much  noise  as  possible,  reminding  one 
of  a  lot  of  small  boys  on  a  rampage.  Most  still  had  the  black  crown 
of  their  nuptial  dress. 

11.  Sterna  hirundo,  Common  Tern.  May  almost  be  called  a  summer 
resident,  as  it  is  common  after  the  first  of  August,  and  I  have  seen 
twenty  as  late  as  May  20  (1915),  at  Mineral  Springs.  Some  days  this 
species  makes  up  the  bulk  of  the  tern  flocks  over  the  lake,  on  others 
the  preceding  leads  in  numbers. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes.  283 

12.  Sterna  dougalli,  Roseate  Tern.  A  specimen  of  this  rare  acci- 
dental visitor  to  inland  waterbodies  was  secured  by  Mr.  Stoddard  on 
the  beach  between  Millers  and  Dune  Park,  August  14,  1916.  This 
seems  to  be  the  first  clear  record  for  this  bird  in  Indiana,  for  the  records 
cited  by  Mr.  A.  W.  Butler  in  his  "Birds  of  Indiana"  either  are  for 
adjoining  states  only  or  do  not  state  whether  the  specimen  was  taken 
or  not, 

13.  Hydrochelidon  nigra  surinamensis.  Black  Tern.  This  species  is 
extremely  common  in  August  and  September  at  the  southern  end  of 
Lake  Michigan,  where  we  have  taken  specimens  as  late  as  August  30 
(1916),  still  in  the  entirely  black  breeding  plumage.  If  they  do  not 
nest  in  the  region  under  discussion,  they  certainly  do  in  the  immediate 
vicinity,  as  on  Wolf  and  Hyde  Lake,  almost  on  the  state  line,  also  in 
larger  sloughs  a  little  south  of  the  dune  region. 

Order  Steganopodes:    Totipalmate  Swimmers. 

14.  Phalacrocorax  auritus  auritus,  Double-crested  Cormarant.  Al- 
though we  have  no  recent  records  for  the  occurrence  of  this  species, 
there  are  numerous  ones  for  the  inmiediate  neighborhood  of  the  dune 
region  in  a  wider  sense  than  as  used  above,  such  as*  Liverpool,  Lake 
County,  three  miles  south  of  Millers,  where  one  was  taken  October  16, 
1896;  it  is  frequently  seen  in  Chicago,  at  the  lake  in  the  south  end  of 
the  metropolis,  and  in  the  adjoining  parts  of  Michigan.  Mr.  K.  W. 
Kahmann,  the  Chicago  taxidermist,  frequently  has  specimens  sent  to 
him  from  Kouts,  Porter  County.  Hence  there  can  be  no  doubt  as  to 
the  occurrence  in  the  dune  region  in  the  restricted  sense  indicated  above. 

15.  Pelecanus  erythrcrhynchos,  White  Pelican.  Mr.  F.  M.  Woodruff 
reports  two  at  Millers,  seen  in  the  fall  of  1896,  and  I  have  seen  a  speci- 
men at  Mr.  K.  W.  Kahmann's  shop,  taken  at  Kouts,  Porter  County. 
There  can  be  no  doubt  as  to  the  casual  occurrence  of  this  species  in  the 
dune  area. 

Order  Ansers:    Lamelli  rostral  Swimmers. 

16.  Mergus  americanus,  Merganser.  This  is  a  common  migrant  and 
winter  resident.  They  were  common  at  Millers  December  17,  1895,  and 
on  January  14,  1897;  four  were  seen  there. 

17.  Mergus  serrator.  Red-breasted  Merganser.  Of  the  same  status 
as  the  preceding  species.     Saw  two  at  Millers,  November  30,  1918. 

18.  Lophodytes  cucullatus,  Hooded  Merganser.  Another  common 
migrant  and  winter  resident  all  over  the  southern  end  of  Lake  Mich- 
igan, with  the  added  difference  that  it  also  breeds  in  the  vicinity,  along 
the  Kankakee  River.  It  no  doubt  formerly  bred  along  the  Grand  and 
Little  Calumet,  and  near  the  larger  dune  ponds,  and  may  do  so  still. 


•  Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


284        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

19.  Anas  platyrhynchos,  Mallard.  A  common  sojourner  during  mi- 
gration, and  probably  would  breed  if  there  were  not  so  many  hunters 
at  Lfong  Lake.  I  saw  about  ten  fly  over  the  dunes  from  this  lake  on 
March  18,  1916. 

20.  Anas  rubripes,  Black  Duck.  Of  similar  status  as  the  preceding, 
only  not  so  abundant.  Stoddard  took  a  male.  May  5,  1917,  at  Millers, 
Lake  County,  out  of  eight  he  saw  there. 

21.  Chaulelasmus  streperus,  Gadwall.  A  rare  migrant,  or  probably 
accidental  visitor.  A  specimen  was  taken  October  18,  1896,  at  Liver- 
pool, Lake  County,  practically  in  the  dune  region. 

22.  Ma/reca  americana,  Baldpate.  A  conmion  migrant  and  not  in- 
frequently breeds  in  the  neighborhood  of  the  Dunes.  May  12,  1917,  I 
saw  a  pair  and  approached  it  quite  closely,  at  Long  Lake,  which  acted 
as  though  very  much  at  home.  They  have  been  found  breeding  along 
the  Kankakee  and  in  the  adjoining  parts  of  Illinois  and  Michigan. 

23.  Nettion  carolinense,  Green- winged  Teal.  A  migrant  of  some- 
what uncertain  status.  Mr.  Stoddard  saw  a  pair  at  Dune  Park,  April  1, 
1917. 

24.  Querquedula  discors,  Blue-winged  Teal.  A  common  migrant  and 
rather  common  breeder  over  the  whole  region.  May  30,  1916,  I  saw  two 
in  Long  Lake,  which  indicates  their  breeding  there.  May  31,  1912,  I 
saw  three  or  four  on  Hyde  Lake  in  Illinois,  right  over  the  Indiana  line. 
When  once  the  Dunes  are  made  a  state  or  national  park,  or  when  at 
least  the  present  federal  law  regarding  spring  shooting  is  enforced 
strictly,  also  against  the  "original  squatters"  in  this  region,  who  now 
consider  themselves  above  such  laws,  this  species,  as  well  as  the  Mallard, 
the  Hooded  Merganser,  the  Wood  Duck,  the  Baldpate  and  others  will 
no  doubt  breed  here  again  as  in  former  years. 

25.  Spatula  clypeata,  Shoveller.  Of  similar  status  as  the  preceding, 
perhaps  not  quite  as  common.  I  saw  two  pair  in  Long  Lake,  April  24, 
1916,  and  May  31,  1912,  three  in  Hyde  Lake,  near  the  Indiana  line. 

26.  Dafila  acuta.  Pintail.  A  common  migrant.  E.  W.  Nelson  in  his 
"Birds  of  Northeastern  Illinois"  states  that  he,  in  1876,  found  several 
pair  nesting  in  the  sloughs  near  the  Calumet  River,  which  may  have 
been  within  this  region. 

27.  Aix  sponsa,  Wood  Duck.  The  quiet  and  often  rather  large 
ponds  on  the  south  margin  of  and  between  the  Dunes  are  ideal  breeding 
places  for  this  beautiful  duck,  and  it  is  no  doubt  only  owing  to  the 
relentless  persecution  of  past  years  that  it  now  is  seldom  or  never  seen 
in  summer.  Let  us  hope  for  better  times  for  them  in  the  near  future. 
It  is  almost  criminal  in  my  eyes  to  shoot  and  pluck  such  beauty. 

28.  Marila  americava,  Redhead.  » 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes,  285 

29.  Ma/rila  valisneria.  Canvas-back.  These  two  species  were  formerly 
abundant  on  Wolf  and  George  Lakes,  at  the  edge  of  the  dune  country, 
also  at  Liverpool,  Lake  County,  where  a  large  flock  of  the  latter  were 
seen  February  28,  1896,  by  Mr.  J.  G.  Parker,  but  now  they  are  far  less 
common. 

30.  Marila  marila,  Scaup  Duck.  March  18  and  April  24,  1916,  I 
saw  flocks  of  fifteen  and  seven  on  Long  Lake  which  I  took  to  be  this 
species.  There  is  absolutely  no  reason  why  they  should  not  be  here, 
as  well  as  Marila  affinis,  since  they  breed  from  Minnesota  northward 
and  winter  from  there  south  and  southeastward,  thus  being  almost  com- 
pelled to  cross  over. 

31.  Marila  affinis,  Lesser  Scaup  Duck.  An  abundant  migrant  over 
the  whole  region  of  which  the  Dune  region  is  the  centre. 

32.  Marila  collaris,  Ring-necHed  Duck.  Also  this  species  can  hardly 
avoid  being  found  here  during  migration,  although  I  have  no  positive 
dates  at  my  command.  It  is  simply  a  matter  of  having  enough  time  to 
be  there  continually  during  migration  to  find  this  and  other  species  of 
similar  habits  and  range. 

33.  Clangula  clangula  americana.  Golden-eye.  A  common  winter 
resident  throughout  the  southern  end  of  Lake  Michigan.  This  is  a 
hardy  species  and  is  in  some  places  called  Winter  Duck.  March  18, 
1916,  I  saw  about  twenty-five  on  Long  Lake. 

34.  Charitonetta  albeola,  Buffle-head.  Not  as  common  as  the  pre- 
ceding one,  since  it  spends  the  winter  farther  south  as  a  rule.  Mr. 
Stoddard  took  a  female  out  of  a  small  flock  on  Long  Lake,  April  25,  1917. 

35.  Harelda  hyemalis.  Old-squaw.  An  abundant  winter  resident. 
Mr.  J.  G.  Parker,  Jr.,  and  Mr.  F.  W.  Woodruff  saw  large  flocks  of  them 
at  Millers  in  January  and  February,  1897. 

The  Eiders  and  Scoters  would  probably  in  time  nearly  all  be  seen 
by  one  who  would  have  the  time  and  hardihood  to  patrol  the  beach  daily 
during  the  winter,  as  there  are  records  for  them  from  as  near  the  south 
end  of  the  lake  as  Chicago. 

36.  Erismatura  jamaicensis,  Ruddy  Duck.  Early  records  show  that 
this  species  not  only  visited  here  but  bred  in  this  region.  Mr.  H.  K. 
Coale  found  two  males  and  a  female  together  at  Tolleston,  now  a  part 
of  Gary,  May  9,  1877.  It  no  doubt  still  returns  to  the  ponds  and  slug- 
gish streams  so  well  loved  by  it,  as  the  Grand  and  Little  Calumet. 

What  has  above  been  said  concerning  the  Eiders  and  Scoters  prob- 
ably holds  good  for  the  various  Geese,  of  which  we  have  no  definite 
record  for  the  narrow  region  under  discussion.  They  would  probably 
nearly  all  be  seen  in  time.  Mr.  Stoddard  saw  six  Snow  Geese  off  Gary 
October  21,  1916,  which  I  would  put  down  as  Chen  hyperboreus  hyper- 
boreus,  since  that  is  the  form  whose  breeding  range  is  west  of  Hudson 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


286        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 

Bay,  and  would  probably  come  south  on  the  west  side  of  Lake  Michigan, 
while  those  coming  southwest  in  fall  along  the  coast  from  Michig^an 
should  be  the  eastern  form,  Chen  hyperboreus  nivalis. 

37.  Chen  caerulescens.  Blue  Goose.  Mr.  Stoddard  saw  a  flock  of 
about  forty  off  Gary,  October  21,  1916,  one  of  which,  a  fine  male,  he 
collected.  He  concludes  that  this  species  is  probably  common  for  a  few 
days  in  fall  along  the  southern  end  of  the  lake. 

38.  Branta  canadensis  canadensis,  Canada  Goose.  This  species  not 
so  long  ago  bred  in  the  Calumet  marshes,  adjacent  to  our  area,  and  is 
now  a  common  migrant  and  winter  resident.  March  18,  1916,  a  flock 
of  about  forty  were  holding  a  sort  of  convention,  apparently,  at  the 
edge  of  the  ice,  off  Millers,  where  they  were  very  noisy,  as  though 
debating  hard.  April  1,  a  flock  of  twelve  flew  northward,  later  a  flock 
of  thirty  came  in  wedge  formation,  then  formed  a  broad  line  front,  and 
then  suddenly,  as  if  by  command,  broke  and  plunged  down  on  the  lake. 

39.  Olor  columbianus,  Whistling  Swan.  Mr.  Woodruff  reports  see- 
ing several  specimens  that  had  been  taken  at  Liverpool,  Lake  County, 
and  he  himself  shot  one  near  Hyde  Lake  in  Indiana.  It  no  doubt  still 
flies  over  our  region  in  its  migration. 

Order  Herodiones:    Storks,  Herons,  Ibises. 

40.  Botaums  lentiginosus,  Bittern.  A  common  summer  resident, 
April  24,  1916,  I  heard  two  "pumping"  at  Mineral  Springs. 

41.  Ixobrychus  exilis.  Least  Bittern.  A  common  summer  resident  in 
the  fringe  of  cat-tail  around  most  ponds,  especially  at  Long  Lake,  where 
I  scared  up  one  September  25,  1915.  Stoddard  found  a  nest  under  con- 
struction there  June  2,  1916. 

42.  Ardea  herodias,  Great  Blue  Heron.  A  migrant  of  diminishing 
numbers,  and  a  few  pairs  may  still  breed  along  the  Calumet,  as  they 
formerly  did  in  considerable  numbers.  I  saw  one  August  13,  1915,  at 
Millers. 

43.  Butorides  virescens  virescens,  Green  Heron.  A  rather  common 
summer  resident.  They  like  to  place  their  nests  in  button  bush  (Cepha- 
lanthus  occidentalis)  and  other  growth  forming  dense  masses,  and  this 
is  found  along  the  edge  of  sloughs  in  abundance.  April  24,  1916,  we 
saw  one  at  Dune  Park,  also  June  24. 

44.  Nycticorax  nycticorax  naevius,  Black-crowned  Night  Heron. 
While  we  have  not  seen  or  taken  this  species  lately  in  the  Dunes,  it  is 
rather  common  in  the  whole  neighborhood,  e.  g.,  Hyde  Lake,  Kouts,  etc, 
so  it  cannot  fail  to  at  least  visit  the  region  occasionally. 

45.  Grus  mexicana,  Sandhill  Crane.  Mr.  Stoddard  saw  three  near 
Dune  Park,  April  7,  1917.  He  is  familiar  with  the  species  from  a  resi- 
dence of  years  in  Florida.    They  have  lately  been  reported  from  a  num- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes.  287 

ber  of  neighboring  locations  also,  such  as  Crete,  Illinois,  near  the  Indi- 
ana line. 

46.  Rallus  elegans.  King  Rail.  A  common  summer  resident  in  the 
large  and  small  cat-tail  areas  of  the  region.  Dates  range  from  April  13 
to  October  21. 

47.  Rallus  virginiantis,  Virginia  Rail.  Also  a  summer  resident,  per- 
haps not  quite  as  common  as  the  preceding  species.  May  30,  1916,  I 
saw  three  at  Mineral  Springs. 

48.  Porzana  Carolina,  Sora.  Abundant  migrant,  but  probably  less 
conunon  breeder  than  the  two  preceding  species.  April  24  and  May  20, 
1916,  I  saw  one  and  two  respectively  at  Mineral  Springs. 

There  can  be  no  doubt  that  the  Yellow  and  Black  Rails  are  also 
found  here,  but  owing  to  their  small  size,  secretive  habits,  the  difficulty 
of  flushing  them,  and  aversion  on  the  part  of  the  dune  hiker  to  thor- 
oughly explore  the  areas  of  cat-tail,  they  have  so  far  escaped  detection, 
but  have  been  seen  at  Hyde  and  Wolf  Lakes,  immediately  adjoining. 

49.  Gallinula  galeata,  Florida  Gallinule.  Nests  rather  commonly  on 
Long  Lake.  April  22,  1917,  the  first  ones  of  the  year  were  seen  there, 
and  June  6,  1916,  a  nest  of  seven  partly  incubated  eggs  was  found. 

50.  Fidica  americana.  Coot.  An  abundant  migrant  and  sparing 
nester.  They  would  no  doubt  nest  commonly  if  left  undisturbed.  A 
few  nest  on  Long  Lake.  January  6,  1917,  we  found  a  dead  one  that 
appeared  to  have  died  recently. 

Order  Limicolae:    Shore  Birds. 

If  one  could  for  a  whole  year,  or  at  least  throughout  the  spring  and 
fall  migration,  patrol  the  beach  of  the  dune  country  systematically, 
many  more  species  of  Limicolae  would  undoubtedly  be  seen  than  are 
here  recorded,  for  it  is  the  logical  place  for  them  to  be  met  with. 
Whether  they  come  in  fall  along  the  east  or  west  shore  of  LaVe  Mich- 
igan, they  must  come  here,  the  south  end  of  the  lake. 

51.  Philohela  minor,  Woodcock.  A  summer  resident  which  is  not 
very  common.  The  many  campers  and  dune  prowlers  probably  make 
this  region  increasingly  distasteful  to  it.  July  18,  1911,  I  flushed  two 
from  a  willow  thicket  at  the  border  of  a  small  pool  at  Millers,  and  I 
have  seen  them  at  Mineral  Springs. 

52.  GaUinago  delicata,  Wilson's  Snipe.     A  common  migrant. 

53.  Macrorhamphus  griseus  griseiLS,  Dowitcher.  A  rare  migrant. 
Mr.  F.  W.  Woodruff  saw  one  or  more  of  them  at  Liverpool,  Septem- 
ber 2,  1892. 

The  Stilt  Sandpiper,  MicropaJ,ama  himantopus,  has  also  been  taken 
near  our  region,  and  no  doubt  is  also  one  of  the  rare  sojourners  among 
the  shore  birds. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


288        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

54.  Tringa  canuttis,  Knot.  A  migrant,  probably  not  as  rare  as  usu- 
ally thought.  Mr.  Stoddard  took  two  specimens,  both  in  spring  plumage, 
June  2,  1917,  and  September  2,  1916,  at  Millers,  and  I  took  one  at  the 
same  place  from  among  a  flock  of  Sanderlings,  September  25,  1916. 

56.     Pisohia  maculata,  Pectoral  Sandpiper.     An  abundant  migrant 

56.  Pisohia  bairdi,  Baird's  Sandpiper.  A  rare  migrant.  A  few  may 
be  seen  during  August  and  September  on  the  beach  near  Millers,  which, 
by  the  way,  seems  to  be  the  best  place  for  Sandpipers,  especially  the 
rare  ones.  Mr.  Stoddard  secured  two  fine  specimens  at  Dune  Park, 
August  23,  1916,  and  two  at  Millers,  September  2,  1916. 

57.  Pisohia  minutilla.  Least  Sandpiper.  A  common  migrant  The 
small  troops  of  scurrying  sandpipers  on  the  beach  are  largely  made  up 
of  this  species.    August  13,  1916,  I  saw  about  ten  at  Millers. 

58.  Pelidna  alpina  sakhalina,  Red-backed  Sandpiper.  A  common 
spring  migrant  over  the  whole  neighborhood,  so  it  must  at  times  be 
found  here  also.  Mr.  G.  F.  Clingman  took  a  specimen  here,  on  the 
beach,  June  1,  1879. 

59.  Ereunetes  pusillus,  Semipalmated  Sandpiper.  A  common  mi- 
grant along  the  beach,  where  it  may  be  seen  in  the  company  of  the 
Least  Sandpiper,  Sanderling  and  others.  August  14th,  23rd  and  30th, 
1916,  they  were  plentiful  on  the  beach  at  Millers. 

60.  Calidris  leiLCophaea,  Sanderling.  An  abundant  migrant.  The 
earliest  record  for  the  fall  migration  is  July  18  (1911),  when  I  took 
two  from  a  flock  of  fifteen  at  Millers.  From  then  on  they  are  common 
up  to  about  October  1.  One  taken  by  Stoddard,  August  23,  1916,  at 
Millers,  was  still  in  breeding  plumage,  but  after  that  date  all  were  in 
the  fall  dress.  June  2,  1917,  Stoddard  saw  several  in  full  nuptial 
plumage  near  Dune  Park. 

61.  Limosa  haenmstica^  Hudsonian  Godwit.  Probably  a  rare  mi- 
grant. Mr.  Charles  Brandle  took  one  on  Wolf  Lake,  Indiana,  Septem- 
ber 16,  1898,  which  is  close  to  our  region. 

62.  Totanus  Melanoleucus,  Greater  Yellow-legs.  Migrant.  Mr.  J. 
G.  Parker  has  seen  them  as  early  as  March  30  (1895)  at  Liverpool. 

63.  Totanus  flavipes,  Yellow-legs.     Of  similar  status  as  the  last. 

64.  Helodromas  solitarius  solitarius,  Solitary  Sandpiper.  A  not  un- 
common migrant.     May  20,  1916,  I  saw  one  at  Mineral  Springs. 

65.  Catoptrophonis  semipalmatus  inomatus,  Western  Willet.  Mr. 
F.  W.  Woodruff  refers  the  Willets  seen  along  the  beach  near  Millers  to 
the  western  form.  He  has  taken  many  there.  It  is  seen  occasionally 
from  August  1  to  the  15th  of  September,  also  late  in  April  or  early  in 
May.    (Woodruff.) 

The  chances  are  that  both  the  eastern  and  western  forms  occur  here. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes.  289 

66.  Bartramia  longicauda,  Upland  Plover.  Apparently  a  rare  breeder 
in  our  restricted  region,  but  common  along  the  southern  edge  of  it. 
Mr.  A.  W.  Butler  gives  several  breeding  records  for  Lake  County  and 
the  Calumet  marshes  in  Indiana. 

67.  Tryngites  subruficollis,  Buff-breasted  Sandpiper.  Apparently  a 
rare  migrant.  Mr.  Stoddard  took  a  fine  specimen  at  Millers  on  August 
30,  1916.  Up  to  the  publishing  of  Mr.  Butler's  "Birds  of  Indiana,"  there 
was  only  one  record  of  its  having  been  taken  in  the  state.  This,  then, 
would  be  the  second. 

68.  Actitis  macularius,  Spotted  Sandpiper.  A  common  summer  resi- 
dent.   April  24,  1916,  I  saw  two  at  Mineral  Springs,  and,  on  May  20,  six. 

The  Curlews  seem  to  be  a  thing  of  the  past. 

69.  Squatarola  squatarola.  Black-billed  Plover.  Rather  rare  along 
the  beach.  Stoddard  saw  three  on  August  30,  1916,  at  Dune  Park; 
September  2,  1916,  he  collected  four  fine  specimens  between  Millers  and 
Gary,  ranging  from  full  breeding  dress,  through  the  eclipse  plumage  of 
a  few  black  feathers  only  on  belly,  to  entire  fall  dress.  The  last  one 
noted  by  him  was  October  15,  1916,  near  Gary. 

70.  Charadrius  dominicus  dominicus,  Golden  Plover.  Probably  now 
rarer  here  than  the  preceding  species.  Both  are  migrants,  of  course. 
I  saw  two,  April  24,  1915,  at  Tremont. 

71.  OxyechtLs  vociferus,  Killdeer.     A  common  migrant  and  breeder. 

72.  Aegialitis  sewipalmata,  Semipalmated  Plover.  A  migrant,  asso- 
ciating with  Semipalmated  and  Least  Sandpipers  on  the  beach. 

73.  Aegialitis  meloda,  Piping  Plover.  Formerly  a  common,  now  a 
rather  rare  breeder.  Despite  the  overrunning  of  its  peculiar  breeding 
grounds  on  the  part  of  campers,  bathers,  dune  prowlers,  ecology  classes 
and  others,  this  dapper,  attractive  little  beach  sprite  has  survived  here 
as  breeder  to  probably  a  half  dozen  pairs  between  Millers  and  Mineral 
Springs.  Its  peculiar  habitat  is  the  depression  between  the  first  two 
low,  incipient  dunes,  a  few  rods  back  from  the  lake.  Sets  of  eggs  are 
found  nearly  every  year.  Stoddard  has  taken  specimens  August  23, 
1916,  in  full  summer  dress;  August  23,  1916,  in  the  eclipse  plumage, 
and  September  2,  1916,  in  full  winter  dress. 

74.  Arenaria  interpres  interpres,  Turnstone.  A  migrant.  Mr.  Stod- 
dard took  one  June  2,  1917,  at  Millers  in  full  breeding  plumage.  They 
are  here  again  by  August  5  (1916),  when  he  took  another  specimen  yet 
in  full  spring  dress.  One  taken  August  23,  1916,  was  partly  changed, 
and  the  last  of  September  2,  1916,  was  entirely  in  winter  plumage. 

Order  Gallinae:    Gallinaceous  Birds. 

75.  Colinus  virginianus  virginianus.  Bob-white.  This  attractive  spe- 
cies is  not  as  common  here  as  one  would  wish.     Their  musical  call  is 


19—16668 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


290        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

heard  but  rarely.  March  11,  1916,  we  saw  a  covey  of  about  twelve  at 
Mineral  Springs;  August  24  we  heard  one;  August  13,  1915,  I  saw  two 
on  the  dune  immediately  behind  the  electric  railway  station  at  Millers. 

76.  Bonasa  umbellus  umJbelhvs,  Ruffed  Grouse.  This  fine  species  still 
holds  its  own  in  the  dense  covers  of  scrubby  oak,  juniper,  sumac,  etc., 
between  the  middle  dunes  and  in  the  woods  on  the  southern  fringe  of 
them.  No  more  than  three  or  four  at  the  highest  are  seen  in  a  day's 
walk.  March  11,  1916,  I  flushed  three  at  Mineral  Springs;  on  the  18th, 
one  at  Millers;  July  16,  1915,  also  one  at  the  last-named  place;  one 
January  6,  1917,  and  one  February  17,  1917. 

77.  Tympanuchus  americamis  americanus,  Prairie  Chicken.  Very 
rare  here.  Mr.  Stoddard  saw  two  near  Mineral  Springs  in  the  fall  of 
1913.  They  had  probably  sought  refuge  there  from  the  persecution  of 
hunters  a  little  farther  south. 

Order  Columbae:    Pigeons  and  Doves. 

77.  Zenaidura  nuLcroura  carolinensis.  Mourning  Dove.  A  rather  com- 
mon summer  resident,  but  present  in  spring  and  fall  as  well.  April  1, 
1916,  two  were  seen  at  Millers;  on  the  24th,  four  at  Mineral  Springs; 
May  20th,  six  at  Millers,  one  nest  on  ground,  with  two  eggs. 

The  last  records  of  the  memorable  Passenger  Pigeon,  which  is  a 
thing  of  the  past  for  this  region,  are  probably  those  given  by  Mr.  Wood- 
ruff in  his  "Birds  of  the  Chicago  Area,"  where  he  quotes  from  the 
"Auk,"  Vol.  12,  page  389,  as  follows:  "April  8,  1894,  Mr.  Edward  J. 
Geckler  saw  a  flock  of  about  fifteen  Wild  Pigeons  flying  while  in  a 
woods  near  Liverpool,  Indiana. 

"Mr.  Kaempfer,  a  taxidermist  of  this  city,  had  a  fine  male  Passenger 
Pigreon  mounted  on  one  of  his  shelves  which  was  brought  in  on  March 
14,  1894.  The  gentleman  who  brought  it  said  he  shot  it  near  Liverpool, 
Indiana,  and  saw  quite  a  number  of  them  at  that  time." 

Order  Raptores:    Birds  of  Prey. 

79.  Cathartes  aura  septentrionalis,  Turkey  Vulture.  A  rare  acci- 
dental visitor,  though  one  would  expect  it  to  be  more  common.  Stoddard 
saw  three  at  Tremont,  July  4,  1917.  For  hawks  this  is  a  great  region, 
as  is  to  be  expected,  considering  the  great  number  of  small  rodents  and 
large  and  small  swamp  birds  found  here. 

80.  Circus  hudsonius,  Marsh  Hawk.  This  is  the  commonest  hawk, 
where  it  finds  the  many  large  and  small  swales  to  its  liking  for  feeding 
and  nesting.  They  come  early  and  stay  late.  March  11,  1916,  five  or  six 
were  seen  at  Mineral  Springs;  on  the  18th,  two;  April  1,  1916,  four,  or 
rather  two  pair,  were  observed  mating  at  Millers.  May  20,  1916,  we 
saw  seven  at  Mineral  Springs  and  found  a  nest  in  a  large  swale  with 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes.  291 

five  half -incubated  eggs.  May  30th  another  nest  with  four  eggs  was 
found  there.  Stoddard  located  six  nests  within  a  radius  of  one  mile  of 
Mineral  Springs. 

81.  Accipiter  velox,  Sharp-shinned  Hawk.  A  much  rarer  breeder. 
March  11,  1916,  we  saw  one  at  Mineral  Springs;  April  1st,  two;  August 
13,  1915,  I  saw  one  at  Millers;  May  12,  1917,  one  in  immature  plumage 
at  Mineral  Springs. 

82.  Accipiter  cooperi,  Cooper's  Hawk.  This  species  is  a  little  com- 
moner than  the  preceding.  It  has  picked  on  the  stand  of  large  timber 
in  the  Mineral  Springs-Tremont  sector  as  being  to  its  liking.  April  1, 
1916,  we  saw  four  at  the  former  place;  May  2,  one;  May  25,  1914,  Stod- 
dard found  a  nest  with  four  partly  incubated  eggs  45  feet  up  in  a  tam- 
arack. July  13,  1915,  he  took  four  young,  nearly  ready  to  fly,  from  a 
nest  at  the  latter  place.  The  next  year  he  located  a  nest  in  the  same 
place,  also  with  four  eggs,  on  May  21st.  We  saw  two  there  February 
17,  1917. 

83.  Astur  atricapillus  atricapilliis,  Goshawk.  Probably  a  rare  winter 
visitant  I  saw  one  February  17,  1917,  at  Mineral  Springs,  carrying  a 
cottontail  in  his  talons. 

84.  Buteo  borealis  borealis.  Red-tailed  Hawk.  A  rather  uncommon 
siunmer  resident,  commoner  in  migration.  April  24,  1916,  we  saw  two 
at  Mineral  Springs;  May  12,  1917,  one. 

85.  Buteo  lineatus  lineatus,  Red-shouldered  Hawk.  This  is  after  the 
Marsh  Hawk  the  commonest  hawk.  One  or  more  can  be  seen  at  every 
visit  to  the  Dunes.  Dates  are:  April  24,  1915,  one  seen  at  Tremont; 
May  29,  1916,  one  at  Mineral  Spiings;  March  11,  1916,  four  at  Mineral 
Springs;  April  1,  one  at  Millers;  August  20,  1916,  one  at  Mineral 
Springs;  September  25,  1915,  one  at  Millers.  Mr.  Stoddard  found  a 
nest  at  Mineral  Springs. 

86.  Buteo  platypterus,  Broad-winged  Hawk.  Seems  to  be  rare  here, 
probably  common  enough  on  some  days  during  migration.  Mr.  Butler 
quotes  Mr.  C.  E.  Aiken,  who  says  that  it  breeds  in  Lake  County.  I  saw 
two  at  Whiting,  Lake  County,  April  18,  1914. 

87.  Archihuteo  lagopus  sancti-johannis,  Rough-legged  Hawk.  Mr. 
Butler  quotes  Mr.  J.  G.  Parker  as  saying  that  this  is  the  commonest  of 
the  large  hawks  in  Lake  County  in  winter.  I  saw  one  November  30, 
1918,  near  Millers. 

88.  Haliaetus  leucocephalus  leucocephaXuSy  Bald  Eagle.  Up  to  within 
twenty  years  or  less  ago  this  great  bird  was  almost  a  common  sight  in 
the  Dunes,  nesting  regularly.  When  the  number  of  foolish  gunners  in- 
creased, it  had  to  go;  but  it  still  comes  back  from  time  to  time  as  if  to 
survey  its  former  realms  again.  Mr.  Stoddard  saw  a  bird  in  the  imma- 
ture plumage  at  close  range  at  Millers,  October  15,  1916,  and  Mr.  W.  D. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


292        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Richardson,  who  spends  more  time  in  the  Dunes  than  anybody  I  know 
of,  saw  three  at  Mineral  Springs,  June  17,  1917. 

89.  Falco  columbarius  columbarius,  Pigeon  Hawk.  Probably  not  as 
rare  as  supposed.     We  saw  one  at  Mineral  Springs,  March  11,  1916. 

90.  Falco  sparverius  sparverius.  Sparrow  Hawk.  Rather  rare  here. 
I  saw  one  at  Millers,  September  29,  1915. 

The  Osprey  can  hardly  fail  to  at  least  pass  over  our  region  at  times, 
but  I  have  no  recent  dates.  Mr.  Stoddard  and  I  saw  one  near  Kouts, 
Porter  County,  just  a  few  miles  south  of  the  Dunes,  May  6,  1916. 

91.  Asio  tvilsonianus,  Long-eared  Owl.  Apparently  a  rare  migrant 
and  breeder,  but  is  perhaps  only  more  secretive  than  rare.  Stoddard 
has  seen  several  at  Mineral  Springs,  and  found  a  nest  of  them  with 
three  partly  feathered  young,  May  25,  1914. 

92.  Asio  flammexiSy  Short-eared  Owl.  Should  be  common  here,  as  the 
swales  that  attract  the  Marsh  Hawk  are  equally  attractive  to  it,  but  it 
is  not.  It  must  nest,  as  adults  were  frequently  seen  during  May  and 
June,  1914,  at  Mineral  Springs. 

93.  Cryptoglaux  acadica  acadica.  Saw- whet  Owl.  Probably  a  rare 
permanent  resident,  as  witness  these  dates:  Mr.  Stoddard  took  one 
February  15,  1914,  at  Millers,  and  one  April  4,  1915,  at  Mineral  Springs. 

94.  Otus  asio  asio,  Screech  Owl.  Like  the  Sparrow  Hawk,  this  is 
not  as  common  as  one  would  expect.  It  is,  of  course,  a  permanent 
resident.  We  saw  one  near  Millers  on  March  18th  and  on  August  30th, 
1916. 

95.  Bubo  virginianus  virginianus,  Great  Horned  Owl.  Contrary  to 
expectations,  this  species  is  commoner  here  than  the  Screech  Owl  or 
Short-eared  Owl  seem  to  be.  In  a  walk  between  the  dunes  from  Millers 
to  Mineral  Springs,  three  or  four  may  be  scared  up,  and  there  is  a  pair 
staying  in  the  dark  tamarack  and  pine  swamp  at  the  latter  place,  and 
another  one  nearby.  We  saw  three,  e.g.,  March  11th  and  18th,  1916; 
August  30,  we  saw  one  near  Millers  being  pestered  by  crows.  Stoddard 
has  found  three  nests  in  one  season  alone,  to  which  were  added  three 
or  four  more  near  to  Dune  Park  or  Mineral  Springs  the  following  sea- 
sons. Here  are  nesting  data:  March  15,  1914,  a  nest  was  found  with 
three  slightly  incubated  eggs  in  a  scrub  pine,  forty  feet  up;  March  17th, 
two  eggs  were  found  in  the  cavity  at  the  top  of  a  large  dead  pine  stub. 
The  third,  containing  three  downy  young,  in  a  similar  location,  was 
found  April  4th.  February  25,  1917,  a  nest  with  two  eggs  was  found 
near  Dune  Park,  thirty  feet  up  in  a  pine,  in  an  old  crow's  nest.  March 
4th  there  were  three  eggs,  which  are  now  in  my  collection.  February  24, 
1918,  one  was  found  in  the  same  neighborhood,  probably  built  by  the 
same  pair,  containing  two  eggs,  in  a  Banksian  Pine,  of  which  fine  photo- 
graphs were  secured  by  Mr.  W.  D.  Richardson,  who  succeeded  in  taking 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes.  293 

pictures  of  the  female  on  the  nest,  as  well  as  of  the  young  later  on. 
The  nest  was  discovered  by  Dr.  Alfred  Lewy.  On  one  of  the  nests  the 
remains  of  a  Ruffed  Grouse  were  found,  on  another  those  of  a  Bittern. 

Order  Coccyges:    Cuckoos  and  Kingfishers. 

96.  Coccyzus  americanus  americaniLS,  Yellow-billed  Cuckoo.  A  sum- 
mer resident  which  is  not  exactly  common.  I  have  seen  one  at  Millers 
on  each  of  the  following  dates:    May  20,  July  18,  and  August  30,  1916. 

97.  Coccyzus  erythraphthalmuSf  Black-billed  Cuckoo.  Much  rarer  as 
mig^rant  and  breeder  than  the  preceding  species. 

98.  Ceryle  alcyon,  Belted  Kingfisher.  A  moderately  common  breeder 
in  the  region.  April  1,  1916,  we  saw  three  on  the  way  from  Gary  to 
Millers  along  the  Grand  Calumet.  Here  and  along  the  creek  at  Tremont 
they  are  seen  all  summer  and  fall. 

Order  Pici:    Woodpeckers. 

99.  Dry  abates  villosus  villosus.  Hairy  Woodpecker.  Rare  here,  as 
indeed  it  seems  to  be  over  most  of  its  range.  I  saw  one  April  24th  and 
May  20th,  1916,  at  Mineral  Springs,  the  latter  date  showing  that  it 
breeds. 

100.  Dryobates  pubescens  medianxis,  Downy  Woodpecker.  A  com- 
mon migrant,  not  as  numerous  as  breeder.  March  11  and  18,  1916, 
several  were  seen  attacking  old  cattail  stalks  at  Mineral  Springs. 

101.  Picoides  arcticiis,  Arctis  Three-toed  Woodpecker.  A  rare  win- 
ter visitant.     Mr.  Stoddard  secured  a  male  of  this  species  March  11, 

1917.  Mr.  Butler  does  not  give  this  species  at  all,  so  this  seems  to  be 
the  first  record  for  Indiana. 

102.  Sphyrapicus  varius.  Yellow-bellied  Sapsucker.  A  very  common 
migrant.     Some  dates  are:    March  30,  April  1  and  24,  1916,  Tremont. 

103.  Melanerpes  erythrocephalus,  Red-headed  Woodpecker.  A  not 
very  common  summer  resident;  when  there  is  a  good  acorn  crop,  a  few 
sometimes  winter  in  the  Dunes.  April  24,  1915,  several  were  seen  at 
Tremont;  May  20,  1916,  I  saw  six  at  Mineral  Springs;   November  30, 

1918,  about  fifteen  near  Millers. 

104.  Colaptes  auratus  luteus,  Northern  Flicker.  A  common  migrant 
and  breeder.  Now  and  then  an  odd  one  stays  over  winter.  Thus  we 
saw  one  at  Mineral  Springs,  February  14,  1917. 

Order  Macrochires:    Goatsuckers,  Swifts,  etc. 

105.  Antrostamus  vociferus  voci ferns,  Whip-poor-will.  Must  be  called 
a  rare  migrant  here  and  should  breed,  although  I  have  no  dates  for  it, 
unless  one  seen  May  20,  1915,  at  Mineral  Springs,  indicates  breeding. 
The  Whip-poor-will  seems  to  me  to  be  decidedly  decreasing  in  numbers. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


294        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

106.  Chordeils  virginianus  virginianus,  Nighthawk.  There  must  be 
days  or  evenings  when  this  species  passes  over  in  numbers,  but  we  have 
never  been  here  then,  nor  have  we  dates  that  indicate  nesting,  but  a 
few  pair  probably  do.  May  20,  1916,  I  found  a  dead  one  along  the 
railway  track  between  Gary  and  Millers,  which  seemed  to  have  flown 
against  a  wire,  an  unusual  thing  for  such  an  accomplished  flier. 

107.  Chaetura  pelagica,  Chimney  Swift.  Cannot  be  called  common 
here  in  the  usual  meaning  of  that  word  as  applied  to  Chimney  Swifts. 
A  pair  or  two  are  seen  around  the  farm  buildings  of  the  region  and  a 
few  more  in  the  village  of  Millers.  They  arrive  during  the  last  week 
in  April  and  are  gone  by  the  end  of  August,  with  a  few  stragglers 
flying  over  in  September. 

These  last  two  species  seem  to  me  to  be  extending  their  fall  migra- 
tion farther  into  autumn  every  year. 

108.  Archilochus  colubris,  Ruby- throated  Hummingbird.  This  is  the 
only  member  of  the  order  that  can  be  called  common,  even  if  only 
locally  so.  What  comes  near  to  being  a  nesting  colony  of  them  was 
discovered  by  Mr.  Stoddard  and  Mr.  Richardson  along  the  creek  at 
Tremont,  where  they  found  nine  nests  within  a  rather  small  radius. 
We  also  found  an  old  nest  in  Mineral  Springs,  25  feet  up  in  a  black 
birch,  10  feet  out  on  a  limb. 

Order  Passeres:    Perching  Birds. 

109.  Tyrannus  tyr annus.  Kingbird.  A  moderately  common  breeder, 
but  abundant  on  certain  days  in  migration.  Thus  on  August  13,  1915, 
on  a  walk  from  Gary  to  Millers,  it  seemed  to  be  the  most  prominent 
bird.  On  the  other  hand.  May  20,  1916,  we  saw  only  two  at  Mineral 
Springs. 

110.  Myiarchus  crinitiis,  Crested  Flycatcher.  For  this  species  the 
Dunes  and  adjacent  swampy  woods  are  a  metropolis.  Stoddard  found 
several  pairs  nesting  where  the  B.  &  0.  Railroad  passes  through  such 
woods  near  Millers,  June  21,  1914.  May  20,  1916,  we  saw  about  twelve 
at  Mineral  Springs,  and  August  3,  1915,  about  four  at  Millers;  May  30, 
1916,  five  at  Mineral  Springs. 

111.  Sayomis  phoebe,  Phoebe.  A  few  pair  only  breed  in  the  Dunes. 
March  30,  1916,  Stoddard  must  have  struck  a  migrating  flight  of  them, 
for  he  saw  twelve  near  Millers;  April  1,  along  the  Calumet  from  Gary 
to  Millers,  we  saw  only  two,  one  singing  or  twittering  ecstatically  in 
flight,  which  I  never  saw  a  Phoebe  do  before. 

112.  Nuttallomis  borealis,  Olive-sided  Flycatcher.  Rather  common 
in  migration  from  the  middle  of  August  to  the  first  week  in  September, 
between  and  on  the  dunes  just  back  from  the  lake.  August  23,  1916, 
Stoddard  took  four  at  Mineral  Springs,  and  saw  a  number  of  them 
August  30  near  Millers. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes.  295 

113.  Myiochanes  virens,  Wood  Pewee.  The  melancholy  note  of  this 
small  flycatcher  is  not  nearly  as  often  heard  as  one  would  suppose  from 
the  wooded  condition  of  the  Dunes.  On  the  other  hand  it  cannot  be 
called  rare. 

114.  Empidonax  flaviventris,  Yellow-bellied  Flycatcher.  A  probably 
not  uncommon  mig^rant.  We  saw  one  or  two  at  Mineral  Springs,  May 
20  and  30,  1916. 

115.  Empidonax  virescens,  Acadian  Flycatcher.  Uncommon  over  most 
of  the  Dunes,  but  nests  rather  commonly  in  the  damp  woods  along  the 
creek  at  Tremont.  Stoddard  found  nests  on  the  following  dates:  July 
30,  1915,  one  with  two  partly  feathered  young;  June  28,  1916,  one  with 
one  young  and  one  addled  egf^,  and  one  on  the  same  day  with  two 
freshly  laid  eggs,  at  Mineral  Springs. 

116.  Empidonax  trailli  traillif  Traill's  Flycatcher.  A  few  nest  in 
bushes  in  the  open  swamps. 

117.  Empidonax  minimus,  Least  Flycatcher.  A  common  enough  mi- 
grant, but  scarce  breeder.  May  20,  1916,  there  were  about  six  in  a 
migratory  wave. 

The  Shore  Lark  or  Horned  Lark  (Otocoris  alpestris  alpestris)  prob- 
ably occurs  here  in  company  with  the  Snow  Buntings  and  Longspurs, 
which  frequent  the  beach  at  times  in  fall  and  winter,  but  I  have  no 
records. 

118.  Otocoris  alpestris  praticolay  Prairie  Horned  Lark.  A  rare 
breeder  in  our  circumscribed  area,  common  enough  just  a  little  south 
of  the  Dunes. 

119.  Cyanocitta  cristata  cristata.  Blue  Jay.  A  common  permanent 
resident;  especially  common  in  the  tamarack  swamp  at  Mineral  Springs, 
which  is  protected  from  the  cold  north  wind  by  several  dunes. 

120.  Corrms  brachyrhynchos  brachyrhynchos.  Crow.  A  rather  com- 
mon breeder  and  quite  a  few  stay  over  winter.  The  flocks  of  migrating 
crows  show  what  seems  to  be  a  crossing  of  migration  routes  here.  Flocks 
coming  from  southwest  in  spring  cross  over  to  the  eastern  shore  of  Lake 
Michigan,  while  others  coming  from  southeast  seem  to  make  for  the 
western  shore  of  the  lake,  heading  toward  Wisconsin,  thus  crossing  their 
paths.  In  fall  it  is,  of  course,  reversed.  We  believe  to  have  noticed  the 
same  thing  with  other  migrants,  too,  e.  g..  Bluebirds. 

121.  Dolichonyx  oryzivoms.  Bobolink.  A  common  summer  resident, 
breeding  in  the  swales  and  moist  meadows  adjoining  the  dunes  on  the 
south. 

122.  Molothrus  ater  ater,  Cowbird.  This  is  a  decided  nuisance  in 
our  region.  April  24,  1915,  I  saw  several  hundred  on  a  walk  of  two 
miles  from  Tremont  to  Mineral  Springs,  and  most  were  apparently  look- 
ing for  nests.  To  this  I  ascribe  the  fact  that  there  are  relatively  so 
few  small  birds  found  here  in  summer,  such  as  warblers,  finches,  etc. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


296        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

Cowbird  eggs  or  young  are  found  in  many  if  not  most  of  the  nests  of 
small  species  found  here.    They  should  be  tlynned  out. 

123.  Agelaius  phoeniceus  phoeniceus,  Red- winged  Blackbird.  A  com- 
mon summer  resident.  They  arrive  the  first  and  second  week  in  March 
and  some  stay  late  into  November. 

124.  Stumella  magna  magna,  Meadowlark.  A  common  summer  resi- 
dent in  the  same  places  as  the  Bobolink.  We  saw  one  at  Mineral  Springs 
March  11,  1916.  Mr.  H.  K.  Coale  asserts  that  the  form  breeding  in 
Indiana  and  Illinois  is  Sturnella  mugna  argutula,  Southern  Meadowlark, 
which  is  probably  correct. 

125.  Icterus  galbula,  Baltimore  Oriole.  A  moderately  common  sum- 
mer resident. 

'    126.     EupJiagus  carolinus,  Rusty  Blackbird.     A  migrant  of  somewhat 
uncertain  behavior  in  regard  to  time  and  appearance. 

127.  Quiscalus  quiscalus  aeneus,  Bronzed  Crackle.  An  abundant  mi- 
grant, but  not  very  common  as  breeder.  Arrives  at  the  same  time  as 
the  Redwing  and  is  found  late  into  fall. 

128.  Hesperiphona  vesper tina  vespertina,  Evening  Grosbeak.  This 
rare,  erratic  northern  visitant  now  turns  out  to  be  a  very  common  win- 
ter resident  in  the  Dunes.  They  were  first  discovered  by  Mr.  Stoddard, 
February  6,  1916,  along  the  Calumet  between  Gary  and  Millers,  making 
their  quarters  in  a  densely  grown  ravine  on  the  north  side  of  the  river. 
At  first  a  flock  of  about  forty-five  was  seen,  then  we  saw  small  flocks 
at  Mineral  Springs  on  March  11  and  18;  March  30,  flocks  of  seventy-five 
and  fifty  were  seen.  Then  more  and  more  disappeared,  until  May  4  the 
last  one  was  seen.  They  reappeared  in  the  same  places,  but  not  so 
many,  in  November  of  the  same  year,  1916,  and  were  seen  now  and  then 
also  in  Chicago  till  the  last  week  in  May,  when  Mr.  H.  K.  Coale  saw 
one  in  Highland  Park.  We  saw  small  flocks  of  six  to  eight  March  24, 
1917,  at  Mineral  Springs,  and  Stoddard  took  one  there  May  15. 

The  reason  for  this  preference  for  the  Dunes  became  apparent  when 
I  examined  the  stomach  contents  of  several  taken;  this  consisted  mostly 
of  the  berries  of  Rhus  trilobata,  Rhu^  aromatica,  and  even  Toxicoden- 
dron  vemix.  The  first  two  are  extremely  abundant  near  Millers,  the 
last  at  Mineral  Springs.  November  30,  1918,  I  saw  about  eighteen  at 
Millers,  and  again  December  21st  and  28th. 

129.  Pinicola  enucleator  leucura,  Pine  Grosbeak.  A  rare,  irregular 
winter  visitant.     I  took  one  out  of  two  seen  November  30,  1918. 

130.  Carpodacus  purpureus  purpureus,  Purple  Finch.  Another  most 
erratic  visitant,  only  with  this  difference  that  it  may  also  be  seen  in 
summer.  We  have  not  found  it  often  in  the  Dunes.  April  1,  1916,  we 
saw  two  near  Gary,  and  January  6,  1917,  there  was  a  solitary  one  in 
the  big  timber  at  Mineral  Springs. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes.  297 

131.  Loxia  curvirostra  minor.  Crossbill. 

132.  Loxia  lencoptera,  White- winged  Crossbill.  These  two  erratic 
northern  visitants  were  reported  as  ni-merous  for  Lake  County  during 
the  sununer  of  1869  and  during  the  following  winter,  as  quoted  by  Mr. 
Butler.  They  still  turn  up  every  winter,  mostly  the  former,  at  Beach, 
near  Waukegan,  north  of  Chicago,  and  it  is  unthinkable  that  they  would 
not  also  visit  the  extensive  stands  of  conifers  at  the  south  end  of  the 
lake. 

133.  Acanthis  homemanni  exilipes,  Hoary  Redpoll.  On  December 
23,  1916,  Mr.  Stoddard  noticed  among  the  numerous  redpolls,  then  in 
the  tamarack  swamp  at  Mineral  Springs,  a  small  flock  of  larger  and 
whiter  ones  than  linaria.  He  secured  one,  which  proved  to  be  this  form; 
the  rest  took  flight  and  never  showed  themselves  again. 

134.  Acanthis  linaria  linaria,  Redpoll.  March  11,  1916,  there  were 
hundreds  in  the  swamp  at  Mineral  Springs.  By  November  25th  of  the 
same  year  they  were  back  again  and  were  seen  December  23,  January  6, 
1917,  on  which  days  about  five  hundred  were  here.  By  March  24th  they 
had  dwindled  down  to  about  fifteen,  at  least  that  is  all  we  saw.  They 
fed  on  the  seeds  of  black  birch  and  alder.  They  were  abundant  in  many 
places  around  Chicago  that  winter. 

There  is  every  likelihood  that  the  other  forms  of  Acanthis  linaria 
turn  up  here  at  times,  as  they  have  done  at  Chicago,  but  there  is  no 
one  here  to  register  it. 

135.  Astragalinus  tristis  tristis.  Goldfinch.  A  common  summer  resi- 
dent, and  some  flocks  stay  over  winter.  April  24,  1915,  they  were  com- 
n^on  at  Tremont;  May  30th,  about  fifty  at  Mineral  Springs;  also  July 
18th;  August  13th,  families  of  old  and  young  could  be  seen;  August  30, 
1916,  on  the  other  hand,  I  saw  only  one  at  Millers. 

136.  Passer  domesticus,  English  Sparrow.     This  pest  is  here,  too. 

137.  Spinus  pinus,  Pine  Siskin.  An  irregularly  abundant  migrant. 
October  12,  1919,  a  flock  of  about  500  were  at  Mineral  Springs. 

138.  Plectrophenax  nivalis.  Snow  Bunting.  An  irregular  migrant 
and  winter  visitant.  Sometimes  arrives  about  the  middle  of  October,  in 
other  years  later.  Stoddard  took  three  October  28,  1916,  near  Tremont; 
October  24,  1915,  January  6  and  February  17,  1917,  a  little  fleck  was 
on  the  beach  near  Mineral  Springs.  They  are  always  on  the  beach,  not 
among  the  Dunes. 

139.  Calcarius  lapponicus  lapponicus,  Lapland  Longspur.  Not  com- 
mon. March  18,  1916,  we  saw  a  flock  of  about  twenty  at  Dune  Park, 
where  the  dunes  have  been  removed  and  a  large,  level,  weed-grown  area 
is  now  found  instead. 

140.  Pooecetes  gramineus  gramineus.  Vesper  Sparrow.  A  few  breed 
here;  they  are  found  from  March  30th   (1916)  to  October  28th   (1916). 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


298        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

141.  Passerculus  sandtvichensis  savcmna,  Savannah  Sparrow.  Also  is 
not  common  here.  April  24,  1916,  there  were  quite  a  number  on  the 
large  swale  at  Mineral  Springs. 

142.  Pdsserherbulus  henslowi  hensloun,  Henslow's  Sparrow.  What 
might  almost  be  called  a  breeding  colony  is  found  in  the  same  large 
swale  mentioned  under  the  preceding  species.  They  were  first  noticed 
April  24,  1915,  and  1916.  In  May  their  harsh  "tsrcuy"  call  is  very  notice- 
able. 

143.  Passerherbulus  lecontei,  Leconte's  Sparrow.  A  rare  migrant 
Stoddard  collected  one  at  Mineral  Springs,  October  19,  1916. 

144.  Passerherbulus  nelsoni  nelsoni,  Nelson's  Sparrow.  Mr.  Butler 
quotes  H.  K.  Coale  and  others,  who  say  they  have  found  this  elusive 
species  repeatedly  in  Lake  County,  next  to  the  Dunes. 

145.  Zonotrichia  leucophrys  leucophrys,  White-crowned  Sparrow.  A 
not  too  common  migrant. 

146.  Zonotrichia  albicollis,  White-throated  Sparrow.  An  abundant 
migrant. 

147.  Spizella  monticola  inonticola.  Tree  Sparrow.  An  abundant  mi- 
grant and  winter  resident. 

148.  •  Spizella  passerina  passerina.  Chipping  Sparrow.  A  rather  un- 
common summer  resident.  This  sparrow  is  strangely  rare  in  northeast- 
em  Illinois  and  northwestern  Indiana,  although  common  or  abundant  in 
most  places  of  its  range.  Stoddard  found  one  of  the  few  nests  of  a 
season  at  Tremont  on  July  15,  1917,  containing  one  young  and  one  Cow- 
bird.  During  migration  they  are  common  enough  on  some  days;  thus, 
April  14,  1915,  there  were  many  at  Tremont;  May  29,  1916,  I  saw  about 
fifteen  at  Mineral  Springs,  but  on  the  30th  only  three. 

149.  Spizella  pusilla  pusilla,  Field  Sparrow.  A  more  common  breeder 
than  the  foregoing  species.  They  arrive  about  the  beginning  of  April. 
On  the  first  of  that  month,  1916,  we  saw  one  near  Millers. 

150.  Junco  hyemalis  hyemalisy  Slate-colored  Junco.  An  abundant 
migrant  and  winter  resident.  September  25,  1915,  we  saw  about  twenty 
near  Millers,  and  April  24,  1916,  there  were  still  many  at  Tremont 

151.  Melospiza  melodia  melodia^  Song  Sparrow.  A  very  common 
summer  resident,  because  the  many  bush-fringed  pools  and  small  water 
courses  are  just  to  its  liking.  They  come  early  in  March,  and  Mr.  Stod- 
dard saw  one  as  late  as  December  23   (1916). 

152.  Melospiza  lincolni  lincolni,  Lincoln's  Sparrow.  A  rare  migrant; 
perhaps  only  rarely  seen  because  so  secretive.  Stoddard  took  one  May 
20,  1916,  at  Mineral  Springs. 

153.  Melospiza  georgiana,  Swamp  Sparrow.  An  abundant  migrant 
and  less  common  summer  resident.  April  1,  1916,  we  saw  one;  May  20 
about  ten  at  Mineral  Springs. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes.  299 

154.  Passerella  iliaca  iliacaf  Fox  Sparrow.  A  common  migrant;  not 
seen,  however,  in  such  numbers  as  Z.  albicollis.  April  1,  1916,  we  saw 
six  on  the  way  from  Gary  to  Millers. 

155.  Pipilo  erythrophthulmus  eryth/rophthalmus,  Towhee.  This  is  one 
of  the  commonest  summer  residents  in  this  region,  from  April  1  (1916) 
to  late  in  October. 

156.  Cardinalis  cardinalis  cardinalis.  Cardinal.  A  permanent  resi- 
dent, but  seen  only  in  a  few  chosen  places.  At  Mineral  Springs  and 
Tremont,  and  especially  along  the  roads  leading  from  there  to  the  beach, 
from  one  up  to  a  dozen  may  be  seen  any  day,  summer  or  winter.  Novem- 
ber 30,  1918,  I  saw  about  fifteen  near  Millers. 

157.  Zamelodia  ludoviciana,  Rose-breasted  Grosbeak.  A  rare  sum- 
mer resident. 

158.  Passerina  cyanea,  Indigo  Bunting.  A  sunwner  resident  which 
is  somewhat  more  numerous  than  the  preceding,  but  dannot  be  called 
common. 

159.  Piranga  erythromelas,  Scarlet  Tanager.  A  rather  rare  summer 
resident,  something  like  the  Rosebreast  in  numbers.  A  little  more  nu- 
merous in  mig^ration. 

160.  Progne  subis  subis.  Purple  Martin.  A  summer  resident  which 
cannot  be  called  plentiful.  May  30,  1916,  I  saw  only  about  six  on  the 
way  from  Millers  to  Mineral  Springs,  a  distance  of  about  twelve  miles. 

161.  Hirundo  erythrogastra,  Bam  Swallow.  A  little  more  numerous 
than  the  preceding.  Both  form  small  colonies  about  the  farm  buildings 
on  the  southern  edge  of  the  Dunes.  Thus  on  the  walk  above  referred 
to  from  Millers  to  Mineral  Springs,  1  saw  about  fifteen  of  this  species. 

162.  Iridoprocne  bicolar,  Tree  Swallow.  During  migration  many  can 
be  seen  gracefully  skimming  over  Long  Lake,  but  only  a  few  stay  to 
nest.  On  June  19,  1915,  I  saw  a  pair  at  a  nesting  hole  in  a  dead  cotton- 
wood  on  top  of  a  dune  at  Millers,  and  Mr.  Stoddard  found  a  nest  with 
four  fresh  eggs  in  a  hole  in  a  telegi-aph  pole  near  Long  Lake,  June 
8,  1914. 

The  Cliff  Swallow  will,  no  doubt,  occasionally  be  found  here,  too. 

163.  Riparia  riparia,  Bank  Swallow.  This  is  the  only  swallow  that 
can  be  called  common,  and  this  only  locally.  There  are  several  fair-sized 
colonies  in  precipitous  places  en  the  first  dune  from  the  beach,  on  the 
side  facing  the  lake,  near  Millers.  July  9,  1915,  about  three  hundred, 
mostly  young,  were  perching  on  the  sand  of  the  beach  there  or  flying 
about  aimlessly. 

164.  Stelgidopteryx  serripennis,  Rough- winged  Swallow.  A  rare 
breeder.  June  10,  1915,  a  pair  was  at  the  nesting  hole  in  the  same 
Cottonwood  in  which  the  tree  swallows  were. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


300        Proceedings  *  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

165.  Bomby cilia  cedrorum,  Cedar  Waxwing.  A  locally  common  sum- 
mer resident,  and  some  will  probably  be  found  in  winter,  too. 

The  Bohemian  Waxwing  (Bomby cilia  gzrrula)  has  been  reported 
once  or  twice  from  Whiting,  Lake  County. 

166.  Lanius  Borealis,  Northern  Shrike.  Mr.  Stoddard  shot  one  of 
this  species  at  Mineral  Springs,  December  23,  1916. 

167.  Lanius  ludovicianiLs  migrans^  Migrant  Shrike.  A  rather  rare 
summer  resident.  There  is  a  pair  yearly  building  its  nest  at  Mineral 
Springs,  near  the  electric  railway  station;  but  that  is  the  only  pair  I 
know  of. 

168-171.  The  Vireos  are  represented  by  the  Red-eyed  (Viroesylva 
olivacea)  and  the  Warbling  Vireos  {Vireosylva  gilva  gilva)  as  summer 
residents,  the  former  moderately  common,  the  latter  rare;  and  the  Phil- 
adelphia (Vireosylva  philadelphica)  and  the  Blue-headed  Vireos  (Lani- 
vireo  solitarius  splitarius)  as  uncommon  migrants.  The  Yellow-throated 
(Laniviree  flavifrons)  should  be  here,  but  we  have  not  yet  seen  it. 


In  respect  to  Wood  Warblers  the  Dunes  are  a  disappointment,  both 
as  regards  nesting  and  migrating  ones.  There  must  be  something  in 
the  biological  or  physiographic  conditions  that  is  repellant  to  most  spe- 
cies. In  the  woodland  tract  just  south  of  the  Dunes  proper,  they  are 
abundant  enough  during  migration,  but  in  the  Dunes  only  certain  species 
as  the  Myrtle,  Magrnolia  and  Palm  Warblers  are,  or  they  may  be  nor- 
mally numerous  at  certain  points  where  a  large  tract  of  woodland  par- 
takes of  the  character  of  the  non-dune  forest,  as  at  Tremont. 

The  following  species  breed  here:  The  Black  and  White  Creeping 
(Mniotilta  varia),  the  Yellow  Warbler  (Dendrocia  aestiva  aestiva),  the 
Ovenbird  (Seiurus  aurocapilbcs) ,  the  Maryland  Yellow-throat  (Geoth- 
lypis  trichas  trichas)^  the  Redstart  (Setophaga  ruiicilla) ,  the  Chat 
(Icteria  virens  virens).  Of  these  the  Yellow-throat  is  the  commonest, 
the  shrubbery  along  the  many  pools  proving  congenial  to  it;  next  comes 
the  Yellow  Warbler,  which  is  common  in  a  few  bushy  pools  near  Millers 
and  Dune  Park,  then  the  Ovenbird,  but  only  at  Tremont.  The  Black 
and  White  Creeper  is  not  common,  the  Redstart  still  rarer,  and  the  Chat 
has  been  found  only  one  summer  and  in  one  place.  The  Pine  Warbler 
(Dendroica  vigorsi)  and  the  Prairie  Warbler  (Dendroica  discolor)  prob- 
ably breed  here,  since  they  each  have  been  found  once  in  breeding  time 
or  nearly  so,  as  the  latter,  July  16,  1916,  at  Tremont  by  Dr.  A.  Lewy. 

The  following  may  breed  here  occasionally,  as  they  have  been  found 
in  all  the  adjoining  area  around  the  Dune  region:  The  Worm-eating 
Warbler  (Helmitheros  vermivortis)  ^  the  Prothonotary  Warbler  (Proton- 
otaria  citrea),  which  nests  abundantly  at  Kouts,  Porter  County;  the 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes.  301 

Blue-winged  Warbler  (Vermivora  pinus),  the  Golden-winged  Warbler 
{Vermivora  chrysoptera) ,  the  Cerulean  Warbler  (D.  cerulea),  the  Louis- 
iana Water-Thrush  (Seiurus  motacilla),  the  Kentucky  Warbler  (Opo- 
romis  formosus) ,  and  possibly  the  Sycamore  Warbler  (/>.  dominica  albi- 
lora).  The  Louisiana  Water-Thrush  has  been  seen  by  Mr.  Stoddard  at 
Mineral  Springs,  May  5th,  1917,  and  it  breeds  abundantly  just  south 
of  our  region.  The  Cerulean  I  have  found  at  South  Bend  and  at  Addi- 
son, Illinois,  east  and  west  of  the  Dunes,  and  is  reported  just  to  the 
south,  too.    The  same  holds  good  for  the  rest. 

The  following  are  the  migrant  warblers:  The  Nashville  Warbler 
(F.  r.  rubricapilla) ,  taken  May  20th,  1916,  at  Mineral  Springs;  the 
Orange-crowned  Warbler  (V.  c.  celata),  taken  by  me  May  27,  1919, 
near  Millers;  the  Tennessee  Warbler  {V.  peregrina),  which  we  took 
at  Mineral  Springs,  May  20th  and  August  30th,  1916;  the  Cape  May 
Warbler  (D.  tigrina),  taken  August  30th,  1916;  the  Black-throated  Blue 
Warbler  (D,  caerulescens)  ^  seen  April  24th,  1915;  the  Myrtle  Warbler 
(Z>.  coronata),  the  Magnolia  Warbler  (D.  magnolia)  ^  the  Chestnut-sided 
Warbler  (/>.  pensylvanica) ,  the  Bay-breasted  Warbler  (Z>.  castanea), 
the  Black-poll  Warbler  (D.  striata),  the  Blackburnian  Warbler  (D. 
ftisca),  the  Black-throated  Green  Warbler  (Z>.  virens),  the  Palm  Warbler 
(/>.  palmanim),  the  Northern  and  Grinnell's  Water-Thrushes  (S.  w. 
noveboraccnsis  and  5.  noveboracensis  notabilis) ,  the  Connecticut  Warbler 
(Oporomis  agilis),  taken  May  21st,  1916,  at  Mineral  Springs;  the 
Mourning  Warbler  (O.  Philadelphia),  seen  in  numbers  by  me  May  27, 
1919,  along  Long  Lake;  Wilson's  Warbler  (Wilsonia  pusilla  pusilla),  and 
the  Canada  Warbler  (W»  canadensis),  taken'by  Mr.  Stoddard  even  so  late 
as  July  1st,  1917,  at  Tremont.  Of  these  only  the  Myrtle,  Magnolia,  and 
Palm  Warblers  seem  to  be  common  during  migration,  while  of  species 
as  the  Black-throated  Blue  and  Green,  the  Chestnut-sided,  the  Black- 
burnian, and  others,  usually  so  common  in  migration  elsewhere,  only  one 
or  two  individuals  are  seen  in  a  hunt  of  several  hours  in  the  most  favor- 
able places,  such  as  was  May  20th,  1916,  at  Mineral  Springs.  As  Kirt- 
land's  Warbler  (D,  kirtlandi)  has  been  reported  from  a  number  of  points 
in  surrounding  country,  it  must  almost  of  necessity  also  pass  through 
here  occasionally. 
(Nos.  172-210.) 

211.  Anthus  Tubescens,  Pipet.     This  has  been  reported  from  Liver- 
pool, October  18,  1895,  as  quoted  by  Mr.  Butler. 

212.  Dumetella  carolinensis.  Catbird.    A  common  migrant  and  breeder. 
May  20,  1916,  I  saw  about  twenty  at  Mineral  Springs. 

213.  Toxosioma  rufum,  Brown  Thrasher.     A  less  common  breeder 
than  the  foregoing  species. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


302        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

214.  Thryothorus  L  ludovicianus,  Carolina  Wren.  Since  the  Car- 
dinal is  here  in  some  numbers,  and  the  Yellow-breasted  Chat  has  been 
seen  a  whole  summer,  this  species  should  not  be  too  uncommon,  especially 
at  Tremont,  where  conditions  are  ideal  for  it,  but  it  is  almost  absent. 
Mr.  Stoddard  has  taken  one  at  Mineral  Springs,  November  25,  1916. 
I  expect  it  to  move  into  here,  however,  sooner  or  later. 

215.  Troglodytes  aedon  parkmani,  Western  House  Wren.  This  is, 
over  certain  parts  of  our  area,  a  rather  common  summer  resident, 
notably  on  the  first  dune  from  the  lake,  between  Millers  and  Dune  Park, 
where  it  likes  to  make  its  nest  in  old,  vine-covered  stumps  on  the  top 
of  the  dune. 

216.  N annus  hiemalis  hiemalis,  Winter  Wren.  A  not  uncommon  mi- 
grant.    They  are  commonest  from  April  1st  to  24th   (1916). 

217.  Cistcthorus  stellaris.  Short-billed  Marsh  Wren.  I  have  never 
seen  a  place  where  this  species  was  so  numerous,  at  least  locally,  as  in 
this  region.  At  Mineral  Springs,  in  the  large  swale,  there  is  a  regular 
colony  of  them.  May  29th,  1916,  I  counted  about  fifty  here.  Their  song 
is  a  sharp  "psit  tsit  tsit,"  ending  in  a  trill  that  sounds  like  the  knocking 
tofi^ether  of  pebbles.  Henslow's  Sparrow  is  its  neighbor  here,  as  also 
the  Marsh  Hawk. 

218.  Telmatodyies  palustris  iliacus,  Prairie  Marsh  Wren.  This  west- 
ern form  of  the  Long-billed  Marsh  Wren  is  extremely  common  in  all 
larger  cat-tail  sloughs  in  the  Dunes.  They  arrive  about  the  middle  of 
April.  May  30th,  1916,  I  saw  about  75  along  Long  Lake  alone..  Of  the 
numerous  nests  seen,  some  contained  two  to  three  eggs.  By  July  18th 
their  fully  grown  young  still'  further  increase  their  numbers.  At  Cary, 
Illinois,  I  found  some  in  the  marsh  as  late  as  October  17th. 

219.  Certhia  faniiliaris  americana.  Brown  Creeper.  A  common  mi- 
grant. April  24th,  1916,  I  saw  about  30  at  Mineral  Springs.  I  would 
not  be  surprised  to  find  a  pair  breeding  some  summer  at  Tremont  or 
nearby,  as  they  have  been  found  at  Kcuts,  25  miles  south. 

220.  Sitta  carolinensis  carolinensis,  White-breasted  Nuthatch.  A  not 
common  migrant  and  scarcer  breeder.  Even  on  great  migration  days 
not  more  than  three  or  four  are  seen.  This  species  seems  to  me  to  be 
decreasing  in  number  over  a  large  part  of  its  rang^. 

221.  Sitta  canadensis,  Red-breasted  Nuthatch.  An  even  rarer  mi- 
grant than  the  last  species. 

222.  Baeolophns  bicolor.  Tufted  Titmouse.  A  rare  resident.  Has  so 
far  been  found  at  Tremont  only,  June  28th  and  December  23rd,  1916 
(Stoddard). 

223.  Penthestes  a.  atricapillus,  Chickadee.  An  abundant  winter  resi- 
dent and  moderately  common  breeder,  mostly  again  at  Mineral  Springs 
and  Tremont.    March  11,  1916,  a  large  flock  was  attacking  cat-tail  stalks 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes.  303 

of  the  previous  season  along  the  edge  of  the  tamarack  swamp  at  Mineral 
Springs. 

224.  Regulus  satrapa  satrapa,  Golden-crowned  Kinglet. 

225.  Regultis  c.  calendula,  Ruby-crowned  Kinglet.  Both  are  abundant 
mig^'stnts.  In  the  cold  spring  of  1916,  I  saw  about  thirty  of  the  latter 
as  late  as  May,  20th  at  Mineral  Springs. 

226.  Polioptila  caerulea,  Blue-gray  Gnatcatcher.  A  rare  migrant  and 
breeder.    April  18th  (1914)   is  the  earliest  date  I  have  for  them. 

227.  Hylocichla  ustelina,  Wood  Thrush.  A  rare  summer  resident, 
although  it  should  be  plentiful  in  such  a  fine  place  as  Tremont. 

228.  Hylocichla  fuscescens  fuscescens,  Veery.  A  not  very  common 
migrrant.  What  percentage  of  them  is  the  western  form,  salicicola,  is 
hard  to  say  without  taking  a  great  many,  which  one  does  not  like  to  do. 
But  the  chances  are  that  both  occur. 

229.  Hylocichla  a,  aliciae,  Grey-cheeked  Thrush.  On  a  few  days 
during  migration  a  more  abundant  species  than  the  preceding,  e.  g.. 
May  20th,  1916,  when  about  ten  were  seen  at  Mineral  Springs. 

230.  Hylocichla  ustulata  swainsoni,  Olive-backed  Thrush.  Of  about 
the  same  status  as  the  foregoing. 

231.  Hylocichla  guttata  pallasi,  Hermit  Thrush.  A  somewhat  more 
abundant  migrant  than  the  two  preceding  species.  The  earliest  date  we 
have  is  April  1st  (1916). 

232.  Planesticus  m.  rnigratorius,  Robin.  In  the  Dunes  proper  a  not 
very  abundant  summer  resident.  Some  days  in  summer  one  sees  only 
about  two  all  day;  more  common  about  the  farms  along  the  southern 
edge  of  the  Dunes. 

233.  Sialia  sialis  sialis,  Bluebird.  Also  not  so  common  here  as  in 
farming  regions,  but  more  so  than  the  preceding.  The  earliest  date  I 
have  is  March  11  (1916),  but  they  probably  appear  before  this  in  mild 
seasons. 

Bibliography. 

F.  M.  Woodruff,  "Birds  of  the  Chicago  Area,"  1907. 
A.  W.  Butler,  "The  Birds  of  Indiana,"  1897. 
Some  manuscript  notes  by  Mr.  H.  L.  Stoddard. 
My  own  notes. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


304        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


A  Synopsis  of  the  Races  of  the  Guiana  Flycatcher, 

MYIARCHUS  FEROX  (GMELIN). 


Harry  C.  Oberholser,  The  U.  S.  National  Museum. 


The  present  status  of  the  forms  of  Myiarchus  ferox  (Gmelin)  seems 
not  to  be  wholly  satisfactory.  The  following  notes  are  offered  as  an 
attempt  to  aid  in  their  elucidation,  and  also  to  call  attention  to  the 
need  of  more  definite  information  regarding  the  various  subspecies, 
particularly  their  geographic  distribution. 

For  the  use  of  material  the  writer  is  indebted  to  the  authorities  of 
the  United  States  National  Museum,  the  American  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  and  the  Carnegie  Museum  at  Pittsburgh,  Pennsylvania. 

The  geographic  distribution  of  Myiarchus  ferox  as  a  species  extends 
from  Costa  Rica  and  the  Island  of  Tobago  south  through  the  continent 
of  South  America  to  northern  Argentina.  At  present  four  subspecies 
are  current:  Myiarchus  ferox  ferox,  Myiarchus  ferox  venezuelensis, 
Myiarchus  ferox  panamensis,  and  Myiarchus  ferox  actiosus.  An  addi- 
tional race,  Myia/rchu^  ferox  insulicola,  has  been  recently  described  by 
Messrs.  Hellmayr  and  von  Seilem;  and  two  others,  Myiarchus  ferox 
cantans  and  Myiarchus  ferox  pJiaeocephalu^,  have  been  recognized.  In 
addition  to  these  we  find  it  necessary  to  add  another,  Myiarchus  ferox 
ferocior  Cabanis,  making  now  a  total  of  eight  subspecies.  The  bird 
known  as  Myiarchus  cephalotes  Taczanowski,  which  some  authors  sup- 
pose to  be  a  subspecies  of  Myiarchus  ferox,  is  without  much  doubt  a 
distinct  species. 

Myiarchus  ferox  ferox  (Gmelin). 

[Muscicapa]  ferox  Gmelin,  Syst.  Nat.,  vol.  I,  part  2,  1789,  p.  934 
(Cayenne;  based  primarily  on  Tyrannus  cayanensis  Brisson,  Omith., 
vol.  II,  1760,  p.  398). 

Subspecific  characters, — Size  moderate;  upper  parts  dark  and  oliva- 
ceous; gray  of  throat  and  yellow  of  posterior  lower  parts  also  of  a 
rather  deep  shade. 

Measurements, — Male:  wing,  85.5-88  mm.;  tail,  86-89;  exposed  cul- 
men,  19. 

Female:  wing,  82.5-86  mm.;  tail,  83-88;  exposed  culmen,  18-19. 

Type  locality, — Cayenne. 

Geographic  distribution. — French  Guiana,  British  Guiana,  Trinidad, 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Races  of  the  Guiana  Flycatcher.  305 

eastern  Venezuela,  and  northern  Brazil  south  to  the  Amazon  valley  and 
west  at  least  to  the  Madeira  River. 

Remarks. — This,  the  typical  form  of  the  species,  was  originally 
described  by  Gmelin  as  Muscicapa  ferox,^  based  chiefly  on  the  Tyrannus 
cayanensis  of  Brisson.'  This  is  without  doubt  the  species  now  known 
as  Myiarchus  ferox,  so  that  the  proper  application  of  the  name  ferox 
to  this  species  is  clear  and  the  currently  accepted  desigrnation  correct. 
This,  with  the  exception  of  Myiarchus  ferox  insulicola,  is  the  darkest 
race  of  the  species.  The  exact  limits  of  its  geographic  distribution 
remain,  however,  yet  to  be  determined. 

Myiarchus  ferox  insulicola  Hellmayr  and  von  Seilern. 

Myiarchus  ferox  insulicola  Hellmayr  and  Von  Seilern,  Verb.  Omith. 
Gesell.  Bayem,  vol.  XII,  Heft  3,  July  25,  1915,  p.  202  (Man-o*-War  Bay, 
Tobago  Island). 

Subspecific  characters. — Similar  to  Myiarchus  ferox  ferox,  but  wing 
and  tail  much  longer;  bill  stouter;  upper  parts  darker  and  more  grayish 
(less  greenish)  ;  throat  and  jugulum  darker;  and  rusty  margins  of  the 
rectrices  more  conspicuous. 

Measurements, — Male:  wing,  94  mm.;  tail,  94;  exposed  culmen,  21. 

Type  locality, — Man-o'-War  Bay,  Island  of  Tobago,  West  Indies. 

Geographic  distribution. — Island  of  Tobago. 

Remarks. — This  recently  described  subspecies  is  very  distinct  from 
Myiarchus  ferox  ferox,  and  is  the  darkest  race  of  the  species.  It  seems 
to  be  confined  to  the  Island  of  Tobago. 

Myiarchus  ferox  venezuelensis  Lawrence. 

Myiarchus  venezuelensis  Lawrence,  Proc.  Acad.  Nat.  Sci.  Phila., 
vol.  XVII,  February,  1865,  p.  38   (Venezuela). 

Subspecific  characters. — Similar  to  Myiarchus  ferox  ferox,  but  upper 
parts  lighter  and  more  grayish  or  brownish. 

Measurements. — Male:  wing,  84-87  mm.;  tail,  86-89;  exposed  cul- 
men, 17. 

Female:  wing,  80-84  mm.;  tail,  81-86;  exposed  culmen,  16.5-17.5. 

Type  locality, — Venezuela. 

Geographic  distributioti. — Middle  and  western  Venezuela,  west  to 
central  Colombia. 

Remarks. — This  bird,  originally  described  as  a  distinct  species,  is 
without  doubt  a  subspecies  of  Myiarchus  ferox,  and  its  representative 
in  western  Venezuela  and  eastern  Colombia. 


*  Syst.  Nat.,  vol.  I,  part  2,   1789,  p.  934. 
=  Ornith.,  vol.  II,  1760,  p.  398. 

20—16568 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


306        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 

Myiarchus  perox  panamensis  Lawrence. 

Myiarchus  Panamensis  Lawrence,  Ann.  Lye.  Nat.  Hist.  N.  Y.,  vol. 
VII,  1862   (May,  1860),  p.  284  (Isthmus  of  Panama). 

Subspecific  characters, — Similar  to  Myiarchtis  ferox  venezuelensis,  but 
largfer;  upper  parts  lighter  and  more  grayish  (less  brownish),  particu- 
larly on  head  and  neck;  yellow  of  lower  parts  paler. 

Measurements,^ — Male:  wing,  87-96.5  mm.;  tail,  80.5-93.5;  exposed 
culmen,  17.5-21. 

Female:   wing,  88.5-100.5  mm.;  tail,  84-96;  exposed  culmen,  19-22. 

Type  locality, — Canal  Zone,  Panama. 

Geographic  distribution, — Panama  and  western  Colombia. 

Remarks. — This  flycatcher  is  clearly  but  a  subspecies  of  Myiarchus 
ferox  ferox,  being  connected  with  that  form  through  Myiarchus  ferox 
venezuelensis. 

Myiarchus  ferox  actiosus  Ridgway. 

Myiarchus  ferox  actiosus  Ridgway,  Proc.  Biol.  Soc.  Wash.,  vol.  XIX, 
September  6,  1906,  p.  116  (Pigres,  mouth  of  the  Gulf  of  Nicoya,  Costa 
Rica). 

Subspecific  characters, — Similar  to  Myiarchus  ferox  panamensis,  but 
with  upper  parts  anteriorly  more  grayish,  posteriorly  darker  and  paler, 
and  yellow  of  lower  surface  paler. 

'  Measurements,^ — Male:  wing,  92-97  mm.;  tail,  85.5-91;  exposed  cul- 
men, 18.5-21.5. 

Female:  wing,  89.5-95.5  mm.;  tail,  85.5-91;  exposed  culmen,  18.5- 
21.5. 

Type  locality, — Pigres,  mouth  of  the  Gulf  of  Nicoya,  Costa  Rica. 

Geographic  distribution, — Pacific  coast  of  Costa  Rica. 

Remarks. — This  seems  to  be  a  well-differentiated  race,  distinguished 
from  Myiarchus  ferox  panamensis  as  above  noted,  but  it  seems  to  be 
confined  to  Costa  Rica. 

Myiarchus  ferox  phaeocephalus  Sclater. 

Myiarchus  phsBocephahis  Sclater,  Proc.  Zool.  Soc.  Lond.,  1860,  p.  281 
(Babahoyo,  western  Ecuador). 

Subspecific  characters, — Similar  to  Myiarchus  ferox  actiosus,  but  gray 
of  head  and  neck  not  so  much  tinged  with  olive  brown;  yellow  of  lower 
parts  darker. 

Type  locality, — Babahoyo,  western  Ecuador. 

Geographic  distribution, — Ecuador  and  Peru. 

J  Ridifway.  Bull.  U.  S.  Nat.  Mua.,  No.  50,  pt.  IV,  1907,  p.  641. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Races  of  the  Guiana  Flycatcher.  307 

Remarks. — This  rather  well  difTerentiated  subspecies  is  apparently 
the  representative  of  the  Myiarchus  ferox  group  in  Ecuador  and  Peru, 
but  its  limits  of  distribution  are  at  present  undefined.  It  is  of  interest 
to  note,  however,  that  in  color  it  much  more  closely  resembles  the  Costa 
Rican  Myiarchus  ferox  actiosus  than  it  does  the  intervening  Myiarchus 
ferox  panamensis. 

Myiarchus  ferox  ferocior  Cabanis. 

Myiarchus  ferocior  Cabanis,  Journ.  f.  Omith.,  vol.  XXXI,  No.  162, 
April,  1883,  p.  214  (Tucuman,  Argentina). 

Subspecific  characters. — Similar  in  size  to  Myiarchus  ferox  ferox,  but 
upper  parts  lighter  and  more  brownish  (less  greenish)  olive;  gray  of 
throat  lighter. 

Measurements. — Male:  wing,  90  mm.;  tail,  89;  exposed  culmen,  19. 

Female:  wing,  85  mm.;  tail,  86;  exposed  culmen,  16.5. 

Type  locality. — Tucuman,  northern  Arg^entina. 

Geographic  distHbution. — Northern  Argentina  and  Paraguay,  with 
probably  also  Bolivia  and  southwestern  Brazil. 

Remarks. — This  seems  to  be  a  recognizable  race,  differing  from  both 
Myiarchtis  ferox  ferox  of  Guiana  and  Myiarchus  ferox  swainsoni  of 
southeastern  Brazil.  No  specimens  have  been  examined  from  south- 
western Brazil  or  from  Bolivia,  but  in  all  probability  this  is  the  form 
of  the  species  that  occupies  those  areas.  Further  investigation,  how- 
ever, must  settle  this  point. 

Myiarchus  ferox  swainsoni  Cabanis  and  Heine. 

Mlyiarchus].  Swainsoni  Cabanis  and  Heine,  Mus.  Hein.,  part  2, 
September  30,  1859,  p.  72   (Brazil). 

Myiarchus  cantans  Pelzeln,  Omith.  Bras.,  1869,  pp.  117,  182.  (Rio 
Janeiro,  Sapitiba,  Ypanema,  and  Curytiba,  Brazil)  (type  locality,  Cury- 
tiba.  State  of  Sao  Paolo,  Brazil). 

Subspecific  characters. — Similar  to  Myiarchus  ferox  ferocior,  but  bill 
shorter,  upper  parts  paler,  somewhat  more  grayish,  and  more  uniform, 
the  pileum  and  auricular s  not  noticeably  darker  than  the  surrounding 
parts,  as  is  the  case  in  Myiarchus  ferox  ferocior. 

Description.— Adult  male.  No.  177677,  U.  S.  N.  M.;  San  Carlos  do 
Pinhal,  September,  1895.  Upper  parts  dark  citrine  drab,  the  darker 
centers  of  the  crown  feathers  dull  olive  brown,  and  the  upper  tail-coverts 
slightly  rufescent;  tail  warm  fuscous,  the  outer  webs  of  the  outer  pair 
of  tail-feathers  and  the  very  narrow  tips  of  all,  pale  brown;  all  but 
the  exterior  pair  of  rectrices  basally  edged  with  rufescent  brown;  wings 
fuscous,  the  tertials  edged  on  the  outer  webs  with  buffy  white,  the  pri- 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


308        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

maries  and  all  the  superior  wing-coverts,  excepting  the  primary  coverts, 
margined  with  pale  dull  brown,  these  edgings  darker  and  more  rufescent 
on  the  lesser  coverts;  sides  of  head  and  neck  like  the  upper  parts,  but 
somewhat  more  grayish;  lores  paler  and  somewhat  buffy  grayish;  throat 
and  jugulum  pale  smoke  gray;  lining  of  the  wing  barium  yellow,  some- 
what clouded  by  brownish  gray;  remainder  of  lower  parts  pale  primrose 
yellow. 

Measurements, — Male :  wing,  94.5  mm. ;  tail,  88 ;  exposed  culmen,  16.5. 

Female:  wing,  83.5  mm.;  tail,  83.5;  exposed  culmen,  17. 

Type  locality, — Southeastern  Brazil. 

Geographic  distribution. — Southeastern  Brazil,  north  at  least  to  Ba- 
hia,  probably  also  to  Pemambuco. 

Remarks. — This  race  has  already  been  revived  by  Mr.  Hellmayr,* 
under  the  name  Myiarchus  ferox  cantans,  and  it  apparently  can  be  dis- 
tinguished from  both  Myiarchus  ferox  ferox  and  Myiarchus  ferox  fero- 
cior.  From  Myiarchus  ferox  ferox  it  differs  in  its  smaller,  paler  bill, 
its  much  paler,  more  grayish  or  brownish  (less  greenish),  and  more 
uniform  upper  parts,  and  in  its  paler  ventral  surface.  How  far  to  the 
northwestward  in  Brazil  it  ranges  remains  yet  to  be  determined. 

Whenever  recognized,  this  race  has  been  known  as  Myiarchus  ferox 
cantans  Pelzeln,  but  it  should  apparently  be  called  Myiarchus  ferox 
swainsoni,  Cabanis  and  Heine,  in  describing  their  Myiarchus  swainsoni,^ 
gave  as  its  locality  only  Brazil,  and  they  included  in  their  literature 
citations  also  localities  that  belong  under  Myiarchus  ferox  ferodor;  but 
the  diagnosis  is  clearly  applicable  to  the  bird  from  southeastern  Brazil, 
called  later  Myiarchus  cantans  by  von  Pelzeln.'  Since  Myiarchus  swain- 
soni Cabanis  and  Heine  has  several  years*  priority  over  Myiarchus  can- 
tans Pelzeln,  it  is  the  name  that  should  be  used  for  the  present  sub- 
species. 

'Novit.  Zool.,  vol.  XVII.  No.  3,  December  15.  1910,  p.  302. 
-  Mus.  Hein..  part  2,  September  30,   1859,  p.   72. 
•Ornith.   Bras.,   1869,  pp.   117,   182. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Erosional  Freaks  op  the  Saluda  Limestone. 


Elmer  G.  Sulzer,  Madison. 


In  the  Madison  region,  the  Saluda  Limestone  presents  many  peculiar 
freaks  of  erosion.  The  best  exposures  of  these  peculiarities  are  on  the 
Hitz  Hill,  immediately  noi-thwest  of  Madison. 

There  is  exposed  in  part  of  the  quarry  (extreme  east  part)  about 
ten  feet  of  typical  limestone.  Its  top  is  distinctly  formed  and  above 
it  are  several  feet  of  white,  chalky  clay,  doubtless  formed  by  the 
decomposition  of  this  same  formation.  The  section  as  above  described 
extends  for  about  thirty  feet.  Beyond  there  is  a  ^arp,  clean-cut 
projection  of  the  rock.     Where  this  projection  is  supposed  to  join  the 


Figure  showinsr  the  irregrularity  of  erosion  of  the  saluda  limestone. 

main  body,  however,  a  crack  from  one  to  three  inches  wide  intervenes. 
This  gives  rise  at  first  to  the  supposition  that  there  may  be  a  fault,  but 
this  possibility  is  speedily  ruled  out  when,  by  minutely  tracing  the  rock 
courses,  similar  occurrences  of  them  on  a  smaller  scale  are  found. 

Probably  the  most  wonderful  thing  about  this  section  and  many 
similar  ones  in  this  locality  is  the  presence  of  this  chalky  stratum  at 
different  levels.  This  stratum  is  at  times  both  overlaid  and  underlaid 
by  limestones  and  does  not  blend  into  them  but  is  separated  from 
them  by  distinct  lines  of  contact.  In  the  section  discussed  above  chalky 
strata  also  occur  in  the  projection  but  at  a  very  different  level.  At  the 
same  level  in  the  main  quarry  is  the  solid  limestone. 

(309j 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


310        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


Remnant  Monument  Near.  Madison. 


Elmer  G.  Sulzer,  Madison. 


In  1898  Dr.  Chas.  R.  Dryer*  described  Jug  Rock,  a  peculiar  example 
of  erosion  in  Martin  County,  Indiana.  The  existence  of  monuments  of 
a  similar  character  near  Madison  is  well  known  to  only  the  few  scien- 


Fig.  1.    Complete  pinnacle. 


Fij?.  2.     Wide  monument  with  cave  formation. 
*  Proc.  Ind.  Acad.  Sci.,   1898,  p.  268. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Remnant  Monument  Near  Madison. 


311 


lists  who  have  had  occasion  to  do  work  there.  These  curiosities  have 
been  formed  from  the  Laurel  Limestone  of  the  Niagara  series.  The 
most  eastern  exposures  of  this  formation  on  the  Ohio  River  occur  only 
about  two  miles  east  of  Madison.  By  the  time  the  formation  reaches 
Madison  practically  its  entire  thickness  is  exposed.  The  monuments  are 
first  found,  going  west,  in  Wilburs  Woods,  one-half  mile  north  of  Mad- 
ison.    The  accompanying  illustrations  serve  to  give  some  idea  of  their 


FiR.  3.    Isolated  monument. 

character.  They  are  a  very  noticeable  feature  along  the  river  some 
distance  below  Hanover  Landing,  but  their  full  development  is  found  in 
the  above  mentioned  locality.  I  have  noticed  these  monuments  in  Jef- 
ferson County  at  times  standing  individually  as  Jug  Rock,  at  times 
maintaining  a  partial  connection  with  the  mother  rock,  and  again  being 
only  a  pinnacle.  They  can  be  seen  in  all  stages  of  development  in  this 
locality. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


312        Proceedings  of  Indixina  Academy  of  Science. 


A  Kinetic  Model  of  the  Electron  Atom. 


R.  R.  Ramsey,  Indiana  University. 


Modem  theories  of  the  structure  of  an  atom  assumes  one  or  more 
electrons  in  motion  in  or  about  a  central  body  or  positive  nucleus. 
Probably  the  experiment  which  has  been  the  most  helpful  in  giving  an 
idea  as  to  the  structure  of  an  atom  is  the  Mayer  experiment  of  the 
floating  needles.  (Experiments  with  Floating  and  Suspended  Magnets, 
Illustrating  the  Action  of  Atomic  Forces,  the  Molecular  Structure  of 
Matter,  AUotropy,  Isomerism,  and  the  Kinetic  Theory  of  Gases.  Alfred 
M.  Mayer,  Scientific  American  Supplement,  Vol.  5,  p.  2045,  June  22, 
1872.)  This,  together  with  the  work  of  J.  J.  Thomson,  has  become 
almost  classic.  (Phil.  Mag.,  Vol.  7,  p.  237,  1504.)  The  experiment 
gives  an  idea  of  the  possible  structure  of  atoms  and  may  account  for 
the  periodic  variations  of  the  properties  of  the  atoms.  Thus  one  by 
assuming  that  an  atom  of  large  atomic  weight  has  more  electrons  than 
one  of  small  atomic  weight,  may  account  for  the  periodic  table.     The 


•  .  •  •     • 


•■••••■> 

«     •    •     d 


»    •    » 


Fig.  1. 


L 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


A  Kinetic  Model  of  the  Electron  Atom.  313 

periodic  variations  of  the  properties  of  the  atoms  may  be  illustrated  by 
the  periodic  variation  of  the  number  of  needles  in  any  of  the  rings,  the 
inside  ring,  say.  This  has  been  done  by  Lyon.  (Phys.  Rev.,  Vol.  3, 
p.  232,  1914.)  Figure  1  is  a  reproduction  of  the  groupings  of  the  needles 
taken  from  Mayer's  orig^inal  article.  The  following  table  taken  from 
Thomson's  work  g^ives  the  theoretical  groupings  of  the  magnets  from 
one  to  one  hundred.  The  lower  row  of  figures  gives  the  number  of 
magnets  in  the  inside  ring,  and  the  upper  row  of  figures  gives  the  num- 
ber in  the  outside  ring.  The  intervening  rows  give  the  number  in  the 
intervening  rings. 

Table. 

Number  of  Corpuscles  in  Order. 

12    3    4    5 

5    6    7    8    8    8    9  10  10  10  11 
11112333455 

11  11  11  12  12  12  13  13  13  13  13  14  14  15  15 
5  6  7  7  8  8  8  8  9  10  10  10  10  10  11 
11111233    3    3445    55 

15  15  15  16  16  16  16  16  16  16  17  17  17  17  17  17  17 
11  11  11  11  12  12  12  13  13  13  13  13  13  14  14  15  15 

5  6  7  7  7  8  8  8  8  9  9  10  10  10  10  10  11 

11111122333344555 

17  18  18  18  18  18  19  19  19  19  20  20  20  20  20  20  20  20  20  21  21 

15  15  15  15  16  16  16  16  16  16  16  16  16  17  17  17  17  17  17  17  17 

11  11  11  11  11  12  12  12  12  13  13  13  13  13  13  13  14  14  15  15  15 

5  5  6  7  7  7  7  8  8  8  8  8  9  9  10  10  10  10  10  10  11 

111111112223333445555 

21  21  21  21  21  21  21  21  22  22  22  22  22  22  22  22  23  23  23  23  23  23  23  24 
17  18  18  18  18  18  19  19  19  19  19  20  20  20  20  20  20  20  20  20  20  21  21  21 
15  15  15  15  16  16  16  16  16  16  16  16  16  16  17  17  17  17  17  17  17  17  17  17 
11  11  11  11  11  12  12  12  12  12  13  13  13  13  13  13  13  13  14  14  15  15  15  15 
5  5  6  7  7  7  7  8  8  8  8  8  8  9  9  10  10  10  10  10  10  10  11  11 
111111111222333334455555 

24  24  24  24  24  24  24 
21  21  21  21  21  21  21 
17  18  18  18  18  18  19 
15  15  15  15  16  16  16 
11  11  11  11  11  12  12 

5    5    6    7    7    7    7 

1111111 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


314        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

The  object  of  the  present  paper  is  to  describe  an  extension  of  the 
Mayer  experiment  in  which  the  magnets  or  needles  are  rotated.  In 
order  to  understand  how  the  experiment  illustrates  the  structure  of  an 
atom  it  will  be  well  to  point  out  some  of  the  properties  of  atoms.  All 
atoms  have  mass  and  all  the  atoms  of  the  same  element  have  the  same 
mass.  We  find  that  the  elements  have  different  atomic  weights.  Hydro- 
gen has  the  atomic  weight,  one;  and  uranium,  the  heaviest,  has  the  atomic 
weight,  238.  Thus  the  mass  of  the  uranium  atom  is  238  times  that  of 
the  hydrogen  atom. 

The  atoms  of  certain  elements  have  the  ability  to  unite  with  certain 
other  elements  to  form  compounds.  Certain  elements  form  the  bases 
and  certain  others  the  acid  radicals  of  the  compounds.  Or  certain  are 
said  to  be  electropositive  and  others  are  said  to  be  electronegative. 
If  we  examine  the  elements,  starting  with  the  lightest,  hydrogen,  and 
taking  them  one  by  one  in  order  of  their  atomic  weight  or  mass,  we  find 
that  this  property  of  combining  varies  periodically.  In  this  manner  we 
can  form  the  periodic  table. 

All  elements  have  a  definite  spectrum.  That  is,  they  give  off  light 
of  a  certain  wave  length.  Light  is  a  vibratory  motion  of  the  ether. 
The  wave  length  or  frequency  depends  upon  the  source.  Thus  the  atoms 
or  something  in  the  atoms  must  vibrate  with  certain  frequencies.  The 
same  as  in  music,  when  one  hears  the  note  middle  C  one  knows  that 
there  is  a  string,  reed,  or  something  vibrating  so  as  to  make  261  vibra- 
tions per  second.  In  the  same  manner  when  one  sees  the  D  line  of 
sodium  one  knows  that  there  must  be  something  in  the  sodium  atom 
which  makes  5.  X  10"  vibrations  per  second. 

The  X-rays  are  known  to  be  due  to  a  wave  disturbance  whose  wave 
length  is  one  thousandth  that  of  sodium  light.  Thus  when  a  swiftly 
moving  electron  or  cathode  ray  strikes  an  atom  of  platinum  there  must 
be  a  disturbance  set  up  in  the  atom  whose  frequency  of  vibration  is  one 
thousand  times  that  which  produces  the  disturbance  which  we  call  light 

Besides  the  radiations  or  wave  disturbances  of  the  ether  which  arc 
set  up  by  the  atom,  there  are  the  corpuscular  radiations  which  are  given 
off  by  the  atom,  such  as  in  the  photo-electric  effect,  ionization  by  hot 
objects  and  flames,  and  the  cathode  rays,  in  all  of  which  electrons  are 
shot  off  from  the  atom. 

A  theory  of  atomic  structure  must  account  for  all  of  these  phenom- 
ena. Several  theories  and  modifications  have  been  suggested,  all  of 
which  involve  electrons  rotating  about  or  in  a  central  body  or  reg^ion  of 
force  which  has  been  called  the  positive  nucleus. 

The  Mayer  experiment  with  the  extension  which  I  propose  can  be 
used  as  an  analogy  or  as  an  illustration  of  what  happens  in  an  atom. 
The  various  phenomena  of  wave  motion  and.  corpuscular  radiations  can 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


A  Kinetic  Model  of  the  Electron  Atom. 


315 


be  explained  by  assuming  them  to  be  due  to  certain  motions  and  dis- 
turbances which  are  seen  in  the  experiment.  The  experiment  lends  itself 
to  any  or  all  of  the  theories  as  the  fundamental  assumptions  may  be 
changed  to  fit  the  particular  theory  in  question. 

The  classical  method  of  performing  the  experiment  is  by  floating 
magnetized  needles  by  means  of  corks  in  water.  I  have  found  that 
small  bicycle  balls  floated  on  mercury  are  much  more  convenient.  (Pro- 
fessor Merritt  used  this  method  at  Cornell  University  in  1900.)  The 
mercury  surface  lends  itself  admirably  for  projection  with  reflected  light. 
In  projection  it  is  well  to  focus  not  on  the  balls  but  on  a  plane  a  short 
distance  above  the  balls  or  on  the  focal  point  of  the  concave  mirror  made 
by  the  depression  caused  by  the  balls.  The  position  of  the  ball  is  then 
shown  on  the  screen  as  a  point  of  light.  Fig.  5a  is  a  photograph  of 
three  balls;  the  time  of  exposure  is  one-fifth  of  a  second.  Fig.  5b  is  a 
photograph  of  some  thirty  balls;  the  time  of  exposure  is  one-hundredth 
of  a  second.  In  this  the  balls  are  shown  as  points  so  fine  that  one  can 
scarcely  see  them  in  the  photograph. 


Fig.  2. 

Fig.  2  shows  diagrammatically  the  arrangement  of  the  apparatus  for 
projection.  A,  C,  and  L  are  the  arc,  the  condensing  lenses,  and  the 
objective  lense  of  a  vertical  projection  lantern.  M  is  a  mirror  with 
which  the  light  is  thrown  down  on  the  mercury  in  the  tray,  T.  L'  is  a 
lense  with  which  an  image  of  the  balls  floating  on  T  is  focused  on  the 
screen,  I.  M'  is  a  mirror.  N  &  S  is  an  electro  magnet  which  serves  as 
the  positive  nucleus. 

In  the  classical  Mayer  experiment  the  balls  are  fixed.  There  is  no 
motion.     There  is  nothing  to  suggest  how  the  atom  may  radiate.     The 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


316        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

atom  is  dead.  The  motion  of  the  atom  must  be  imag^ined.  It  is  usual 
to  imagine  the  needles  to  rotate  about  the  center  with  a  constant  angfular 
velocity.  This  is  contrary  to  the  laws  of  planetary  motion  as  illustrated 
in  the  Solar  system. 

While  working  with  this  experiment  the  thought  came  to  me  to  rotate 
the  mercury  and  thus  rotate  the  balls.  A  wooden  tray  was  made  with 
an  electrode  at  the  center  and  four  electrodes,  one  at  each  comer  which 
are  connected  in  multiple.  By  sending  a  current  in  at  the  center  elec- 
trode  and  out  at  the  corners  one  has  an  approximately  radial  current 
flowing  at  right  angles  to  the  magnetic  field  of  the  magnet  which  plays 
the  part  of  the  positive  nucleus  in  the  experiment.  This  causes  the 
mercury  to  rotate  and  carry  the  balls  with  it.  The  apparatus  consists 
of  a  wooden  tray  as  shown  in  Fig.  3.    The  dimensions  are  15  x  15  cm. 


A   . 

tJ 

miL 

ah= 

1 

1 

C      M^ 

0                   -c 

="B 

"1 

N 

S 

- 

p-" 

Fig.  4. 


Fig.  3. 


and  2  cm.  in  depth.  The  electrodes  C  and  M  are  made  of  platinum. 
It  has  been  found  later  that  the  electrodes  C  can  be  made  of  iron  without 
appreciably  distorting  the  magnetic  field.  A  and  B  are  binding  posts 
which  are  connected  to  the  electrodes  by  wires,  shown  by  dotted  lines, 
which  are  in  grooves  on  the  under  side  of  the  box.  The  apparatus  can 
be  centered  up  by  placing  one  ball  on  the  mercury  surface  after  the 
current  has  been  turned  on  through  both  the  magnet  and  the  tray  and 
then  shifting  the  tray  until  the  ball  remains  practically  still  at  the  center 
of  the  rotating  mercury. 

When  two  balls  are  placed  on  the  rotating  surface  they  do  not  rotate 
about  the  center  on  the  same  circle  as  one  would  expect  from  the  Mayer 
experiment.  No.  1  first  rotates  about  No.  2,  and  then  No.  2  rotates  about 
No.  1,  their  paths  resembling  rotating  elipses.    Figs.  5d,  5e,  and  5f  are 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


A  Kinetic  Model  of  the  Electron  Atom,  317 

photographs  showing  various  phases  of  the  motion.  The  time  of  ex- 
posure is  about  one-half  a  second. 

With  three  balls  the  motion  is  more  complicated,  the  three  balls  tak- 
ing turns  in  the  center.  Figs.  5g,  5h,  and  5i  give  photographs  of  the 
motion  of  three  balls.  The  motion  reminds  one  of  a  complicated  game 
of  leap  frog. 

With  a  number  of  balls  the  motion  becomes  very  complicated.  The 
mercury  at  the  edges  of  the  tray  is  stationary  while  the  central  portion 
is  rotating.  The  angular  velocity  increases  as  we  go  from  the  edge  to 
the  center;  the  balls  floating  on  the  surface  tend  to  take  up  the  same 
angular  velocity  as  the  mercury  on  which  they  float.  Thus  there  is  a 
tendency  for  the  balls  to  take  up  a  motion  which  may  approximate  to 
planetary  motion.  Thus  we  may  assume  that  they  obey  Kepler*s  law. 
This  is  shown  in  Fig.  5j.  This  photograph  also  shows  two  balls  ex- 
changing rings. 

In  the  Mayer  experiment,  balls  stationary,  when  there  are  a  number 
of  rings  any  one  ball  is  held  in  its  place  by  the  central  force  and  the 
mutual  repulsion  of  the  neighboring  balls.  The  balls  of  one  ring  flt  into 
the  crotches  of  the  neighboring  rings.  When  the  balls  are  rotating  and 
the  angular  velocity  of  the  outer  ring  is  less  than  that  of  the  inner  ring 
there  is  a  slipping  of  one  ring  with  respect  to  the  one  next  to  it.  This 
slipping  produces  a  perturbation  or  a  vibratory  motion  which  is  super- 
imposed on  the  regular  circular  motion.  This  perturbation  may  be  said 
to  be  the  source  of  some  sort  of  radiation,  light  perhaps. 

When  a  ball  is  allowed  to  come  in  from  the  outside  there  is  a  great 
disturbance  of  the  whole  system.  This  is  shown  in  Fig.  5c,  where  a 
ball  has  been  caught  coming  from  the  bottom  of  the  photograph  into  the 
system.  In  this  case  the  balls  were  not  rotating.  If  the  balls  represent 
electrons  this  disturbance  may  be  said  to  be  the  source  of  X-rays  as 
when  a  cathode  ray  hits  an  atom  of  platinim,  say.  With  a  large  number 
of  balls  the  motion  is  very  much  more  complicated  than  one  would  expect. 
At  times  a  ball  will  start  out  from  the  outer  ring  and  apparently  seem 
to  try  to  escape  from  the  system.  Due  to  the  friction  of  the  mercury 
and  the  nature  of  the  field  the  ball  always  returns.  If  a  ball  were  to 
escape  it  would  cause  a  rearrangement  of  the  others  or  a  disturbance 
similar  to  that  caused  by  an  added  ball.  This  tendency  of  the  balls  to 
fly  off  is  especially  great  if  the  current  through  the  mercury  is  increased, 
or  if  the  system  is  absorbing  energy.  This  may  be  an  illustration  of 
what  takes  place  in  the  photo-electric  effect  or  in  the  case  of  ionization 
produced  by  hot  bodies. 

In  the  case  when  a  ball  flies  out  when  rotating  at  normal  or  constant 
velocity  we  have  an  explanation  of  gamma  rays  caused  by  beta  rays. 
Or  we  may  let  the  balls  represent  alpha  rays,  helium  atoms,  or  that 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


318        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


H 

a 

c 

' 

^^^■■■■B^^H 

■ 

6               \ 

e 

' 

1 

■ 

L 

Si 

I 

iH 

■, 

Fig.  5. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


A  Kinetic  Model  of  the  Electron  Atom.  319 

which  in  the  atom  makes  alpha  rays  or  helium  atoms  after  they  have 
escaped,  and  we  have  an  illustration  of  a  radioactive  substance.  To 
illustrate  the  disintegration  of  an  atom  of  radium  through  its  several 
disintegration  products  I  made  a  tray  in  which  I  imbedded  a  ring  of  iron 
so  as  to  make  a  magnetic  field  which  is  strong  at  the  center  and  dimin- 
ishes as  we  go  along  a  radius  passing  through  a  minimum  and  then 
through  a  maximum  over  the  ring  of  iron.  Fig.  4  is  a  cross-section  of 
the  tray  and  central  magrnet.  N,  S,  is  the  central  magnet.  R,  R,  is  a 
cross-section  of  the  iron  ring.  A  and  B  are  binding  posts  by  which  the 
current  is  led  in  and  out.  The  variations  of  the  field  is  represented  by 
lines  of  force. 

To  use  this  the  current  is  turned  on  the  magnet  and  a  number  of 
balls  are  placed  in  the  center  of  the  tray,  forming  the  characteristic 
figfure  due  to  the  particular  number  as  in  the  Mayer  experiment.  The 
current  is  then  turned  through  the  tray,  causing  the  balls  to  rotate. 
When  a  ball  at  irregular  intervals  starts  out  on  a  tangent  it  will  be 
caught  and  held  by  the  intense  field  over  the  iron  ring  at  R.  Thus  if 
the  ball  represents  an  alpha  particle,  the  escape  of  beta  rays  and  the 
gamma  radiation  may  be  explained  as  being  due  to  the  disturbance  in 
the  atom  due  to  the  rearrangement  of  the  electrons  in  the  atom.  As 
many  as  eight  or  ten  balls  may  escape  from  the  system,  each  rearrange- 
ment of  the  system  representing  one  of  the  products  in  the  radioactive 
series.  Fig.  5k  is  a  photograph  of  this.  The  four  white  spots,  one  at 
the  top  and  one  at  the  bottom  and  one  on  either  side,  are  balls  which 
have  been  thrown  out  and  caught  and  held  stationary  over  the  staples 
which  hold  the  iron  ring  in  place.  At  the  top  of  the  photograph  is  shown 
the  path  of  a  ball  which  is  being  tkrown  out  and  caught  by  the  ring. 

Getting  the  conditions  right  is  a  matter  of  trial.  Some  three  or  four 
trays  were  made  before  one  was  satisfactory.  The  dimensions  of  this 
tray  are  as  follows:  Length,  10  cm.;  breadth,  10  cm.;  depth,  2  cm.  The 
iron  ring  is  made  of  a  2% -millimeter  rod  bent  into  a  ring  of  6  cm. 
diameter. 

No  doubt  many  analogies  will  occur  to  the  operator  which  have  not 
been  mentioned  in  this  paper.  The  worst  difficulty  with  the  experiment 
is  with  the  mercury.  The  mercury  must  be  clean.  Any  film  of  dirt  or 
dross  on  the  surface  of  the  mercury  prevents  the  free  motion  of  the  balls. 

The  magnet  and  tray  may  be  connected  in  series,  but  it  is  more 
convenient  to  have  two  circuits  which  may  be  manipulated  independently. 

Department  of  Physics^  Indiana  University. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


320        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 


Some  Contributions  of  Physical  Science  to  Military 

Efficiency. 


C.  M.  Smith,  Purdue  University. 


The  technical  and  popular  press  has  of  late  been  offering  much  valu- 
able material  which  shows  the  contributions  of  the  physicist  and  the 
research  laboratory  to  war  problems.  Moreover  before  these  Proceed- 
ings are  printed  and  circulated  it  is  certain  that  much  more  information 
along  the  same  line  will  be  released.  It  is  not  the  purpose  of  this  paper 
to  grive  a  complete  catalog  of  the  achievements  of  physical  science  in  the 
war,  nor  to  set  forth  in  detail  the  devices  which  have  been  developed  and 
applied.  It  is,  however,  my  purpose  to  sketch  briefly  some  of  the  general 
lines  along  which  the  physicist  gave  aid  to  the  military  forces,  and  to 
point  out  some  of  the  valuable  results  which  have  followed  from  the 
large  activities  and  generous  appropriations  which  were  called  out  by 
the  pressure  of  war  conditions. 

It  will  undoubtedly  appear  that  instances  are  rare  where  war-inspired 
research  has  resulted  in  the  discovery  of  any  distinctly  new  principle  or 
law.  The  lay  public,  keenly  alert  for  some  wonderful  invention  or  dis- 
covery, which  should  overwhelm  the  opponent  as  by  a  great  cataclysm, 
frequently  voiced  the  question  why  our  active  scientists  were  not  bring- 
ing forward  this  all-important  achievement.  But  the  hoped-for  result 
did  not  come  about.  Rather  the  achievements  of  physical  science  in  the 
war  consisted  in  the  application  of  already  well-known  principles,  but 
with  a  refinement  and  a  precision  heretofore  not  realized.  The  careful 
consideration  from  the  standpoint  of  theory  of  the  lines  and  balance  of 
a  shell,  of  the  form  of  its  ends,  and  of  the  proper  width  and  thickness 
of  its  copper  band  resulted  in  the  addition  of  miles  to  its  range  and 
increased  the  accuracy  of  gunfire  manyfold.  Such  precision  studies, 
often  highly  theoretical  in  nature,  growing  in  numbers  to  scores  or  hun- 
dreds, all  contributed  to  an  increased  efficiency  of  the  military  forces, 
and  their  full  value  cannot  at  this  time  be  realized. 

Studies  similar  to  the  above  resulted  in  our  becoming  free  from 
European  markets  in  the  matter  of  high-g^rade  optical  glass.  Precision 
methods  of  glassworking,  amounting  almost  to  quantity  production,  were 
developed,  and  lenses  and  prisms  large  and  small,  and  plane  parallel 
plates  were  turned  out  in  large  numbers  with  an  exactness  heretofore 
hardly  thought  possible.     In  photography,  in  the  great  development  of 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Contributions  of  Physical  Science.  321 

photographic  map  making,  ray  filters  were  devised  for  eliminating  the 
effects  of  haze.  By  means  of  these,  landscape  details  were  clearly  delin- 
eated, while  without  them  the  plates  revealed  little  more  than  a  bank  of 
clouds. 

In  the  development  of  suitable  instruments  for  giving  the  aviator 
information  as  to  his  position,  altitude  and  speed,  and  for  enabling  the 
accurate  dropping  of  bombs  upon  assigned  target  areas,  the  combined 
skill  of  many  specialists  brought  results  of  surprising  value.  With  a 
dynamo-generator  attached  to  the  frame  of  the  airplane,  driven  by  the 
air  stream  and  with  a  control  so  perfect  that  in  spite  of  the  inevitable 
large  variations  in  speed  practically  a  constant  voltage  could  be  main- 
tained for  the  radio  equipment,  the  aviator  was  enabled  to  signal  or  talk 
with  ground  stations,  with  other  aircraft  or  with  his  companions  in  the 
same  machine. 

In  the  science  of  acoustics  many  old  and  well-known  principles  have 
been  revived,  extended  and  applied  in  a  variety  of  ways.  Of  especial 
value  were  those  applications  to  sound-ranging,  for  locating  positions, 
and  even  determining  caliber  of  enemy  guns.  Moreover  the  observer  is 
enabled  to  distinguish  between  sounds  due  to  discharge,  flight  and  burst- 
ing of  the  shell.  Highly  developed  listening  devices  gave  invaluable 
information  in  locating  enemy  aircraft,  in  detecting  mining  operations, 
and  in  submarine  detection.  The  widely  used  methods  of  ground  teleg- 
raphy, invaluable  in  communication,  recall  the  early  experiments  long 
antedating  modem  radio. 

Meteorology  has  taken  its  place  as  essentially  a  new  department  of 
physical  science,  and  a  careful  study  of  the  earth's  atmosphere  has  led 
to  results  of  the  highest  importance  in  determining  wind  conditions 
before  and  after  gas  attacks,  in  correcting  data  for  artillery  fire,  in 
revealing  favorable  conditions  for  the  aviator,  in  foreseeing  conditions 
which  will  aid  or  hinder  transport  service  and  in  predicting  fog  and  rain. 

In  the  field  of  electricity  the  vacuum  tube  or  electron  relay  has  dem- 
onstrated its  indispensability  for  countless  uses;  telephonic  and  other 
communication  devices  have  been  perfected  to  an  astonishing  degree; 
the  dangers  of  electrostatic  charges  on  balloon  fabrics  have  been  studied 
and  methods  of  control  devised;  and  the  quality  of  small  portable  bat- 
teries has  been  much  improved  and  their  life  increased.  In  radio  com- 
munication, already  highly  developed  before  the  war  period,  startling 
results  have  been  realized.  Closed  coil  reception  has  proved  successful 
in  the  absence  of  large  antenna  installations,  and  has  made  possible 
satisfactory  work  in  uni-directional  sending  and  receiving,  in  triangula- 
tion  and  in  receiving  on  submerged  submarines  even  at  transatlantic 
distances.  Without  the  vacuum  tube  much  of  this  important  work  would 
have  been  impossible. 

21—16568 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


322        Proceedings  of  Indiaiui  Academy  of  Science. 

Finally,  however,  the  student  of  the  scientific  achievement  of  the  war 
period,  whether  in  applications  of  known  laws  and  perfection  and  refine- 
ment of  existing  devices,  or  in  pure  research,  cannot  but  be  impressed 
by  the  large  body  of  knowledge  and  experience  which  has  come  as  a 
by-product  of  the  study  of  war  problems.  During  the  war  both  govern- 
ment and  private  laboratories  left  no  promising  clue  untraced,  and  no 
suggestion  was  ignored  if  it  seemed  to  contain  any  germ  of  expectation. 
Although  a  large  part  of  this  activity  did  not  result  in  devices  or  pro- 
cesses directly  useful  or  applicable  to  war  problems,  nevertheless  out  of 
it  all  is  sure  to  come  a  wealth  of  results  of  value  to  our  scientific  and 
industrial  life.  Now  that  the  immediate  need  for  high  pressure  research 
is  at  an  end,  there  should  be  no  decline  in  the  research  spirit.  Now, 
more  than  before,  the  effort  should  be  made  to  maintain  and  advance 
the  effectiveness  of  all  existing  organizations  and  agencies  which  en- 
courage and  promote  diligent  research  in  physics. 

One  outgrowth  of  the  intense  activity  in  physical  research  has  been 
a  growing  interest  in  physical  science  and  its  applications.  Our  stu- 
dents have  been  keener  and  more  alert  and  the  instructor  has  before  him 
a  wealth  of  illustrations  with  which  to  enrich  his  classroom  and  labora- 
tory work.  Also  in  the  popular  press,  setting  aside  the  purely  sensa- 
tional, there  has  been  given  to  the  reading  public  much  stimulating 
material,  and  the  people  at  large  have  been  brought  to  a  wider  appre- 
ciation of  scientific  laws  and  facts. 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


INDEX 


A 

PAGE 

Act  to  Provide  for  Publication 8 

Some  Abnormalities  in  Plant  Structure.    M.  S.  Markle 117 

Analyses  of  One  Hundred  Soils,  Allen  County,  Indiana.    R.  H.  Carr 

and  V.  R.  Phares 151 

Aphids  and  Ants  on  Fruit  Trees.     S.  D.  Connor 245 

Ashley,  George  H.    Memorial  of  Albert  Homer  Purdue 247 

Andrews,  F.  M.    Some  Trees  of  Indiana 261 

Ascomycetes  New  to  the  Flora  of  Indiana.    Bruce  Fink  and  Sylvia 

C.   Fuson   264 


B 

By-Laws 7 

Bennett,  L.  F.    Geology  and  the  War 56 

Bennett,  L.  F.    In  Memoriam.    George  D.  Timmons 79 

The  Barberry  and  Its  Relation  to  the  Stem  Rust  of  Wheat.     F.  J. 

Pipal   63 

Bacteria  in  Frozen  Soil.    H.  A.  Noyes 110 

Beals,  Colonzo  C.    Soil  Survey  of  Cass  County,  Indiana 186 

The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes  of  Northwestern  Indiana.     C.  W.  G. 

Eif rig   280 

C 

Constitution  5 

Committees,  1919 11 

Contribution  of  Botany  to  Military  Eufficiency.     R.  M.  Holman 49 

Conner,  S.  D.    William  James  Jones 81 

Conner,  S.  D.     Aphids  and  Ants  on  Fruit  Trees 245 

Colonies  for  a  Satisfactory  Soil  Plate,  Number  of.     H.  A.  Noyes 

and  G.  L.  Grounds 93 

Carr,  R.  H.    Analyses  of  One  Hundred  Soils,  Allen  County,  Indiana.  151 
Carr,  R.  H.    The  Relation  of  Nitrogen,  Phosphorus  and  Organic  Mat- 
ter to  Corn  Yield  in  Elkhart  County,  Indiana 160 

Coal  in  Monroe  County,  the  Occurrence  of.    W.  L.  Logan 172 

(323) 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


324        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science. 

PA(X 

The  Crustaceans  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee.    Barton  W.  Evermann  and 

Howard  W.  Clark 225 

Clark,  Howard  W.    The  Crustaceans  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee 225 

Clark,  Howard  W.     Certain  Protozoa  and  Other  Invertebrates  of 

Lake  Maxinkuckee 236 

The  Copepod  Parasites.    Chas.  B.  Wilson 230 

The  Crawfish,  Wm.  Perry  Hay 232 

D 

Deam,  Chas.  C.    Plants  New  to  Indiana.    VIII 144 

The  Dormant  Period  of  Timothy   Seed   after  Harvesting.     M.   L. 
Fisher  276 

E 

Evolutionary  Philosophy  and  the  German  War.    A.  Richards 71 

Evermann,  Barton  W.     Certain  Protozoa  and  Other  Invertebrates 

of  Lake  Maxinkuckee,  Notes  on 236 

Evermann,  Barton  W.    The  Crustaceans  of  Lake  Maxinkuckee 225 

Eifrig,  C.  W.  G.     The  Birds  of  the  Sand  Dunes  of  Northwestern 

Indiana   280 

Erosional  Freaks  of  the  Saluda  Limestone.     Elmer  G.  Sulzer 309 

F 

Feeble-Mindedness— The  Problem.     Edna  R.  Jatho 83 

Foley,  Arthur  L.    The  Velocity  of  Sound  Waves  in  Tubes 205 

Foley,  Arthur  L.    Luther  Dana  Waterman 215 

Foley,  Arthur  L.     New  Methods  of  Measuring  the  Speed  of  Sound 

Pulses  Near  the  Source 221 

Fink,  Bruce.    Ascomycetes  New  to  the  Flora  of  Indiana 264 

Fuson,  Sylvia  C.    Ascomysetes  New  to  the  Flora  of  Indiana 264 

Fisher,  M.  L.     The  Dormant  Period  of  Timothy  Seed  after  Har- 
vesting      276 

Flame  Reactions  of  Thallium.    Jacob  Papish 166 

G 

Geology  and  the  War.     L.  F.  Bennett 56 

Grounds,  G.  L.    Colonies  for  a  Satisfactory  Soil  Plate 93 

Golden,  Prof.  M.  J.     B.  B.  Trueblood 258 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Index.  325 

H 

PAGE 

Holman,  R.  M.    Contributions  of  Botany  to  Military  Efficiency 49 

Hoffman,  Leroy.    The  Relation  of  Nitrogen,  Phosphorus  and  Organic 

Matter  to  Com  Yield  in  Elkhart  County,  Indiana 160 

Hole,   Allen  D.     Paleontology   of   Certain    Chester   Formations   in 

Southern  Indiana,  Notes  on  the 183 

Hay,   Wm.    Perry.     The   Crawfish 232 

I 

Indianaite  in  Monroe  County,  Notes  on  the  Occurrence  of.     W.  L. 
Logan    177 

J 

Jatho,  Edna  R.     Feeble-Mindedness,  the  Problem 83 

Jones,  William  James.    S.  D.  Conner 81 

i: 

A  Kinetic  Model  of  the  Electron  Atom.    R.  R.  Ramsay 312 

L 

Luckett,  J.  I).     Time  to  Incubate  Petri  Plates 102 

Logan,  Wm.  L.     Coal  in  Monroe  County 172 

Logan,  Wm.   L.     Indianaite  in   Monroe  County,   Notes   on   Occur- 
rence of   177 

M 

Members  14 

Active 21 

Fellows    14 

Nonresident   18 

Minutes  of  Spring  Meeting 32 

Minutes  of  Fall  Meeting 42 

McBeth,  Wm.  A.    Physiography  and  War 60 

Method  of  Teaching  Diffusion  and  Osmosis.     Paul  Weatherwax. ...  88 

Markle,  M.  S.     Some  Abnormalities  in  Plant  Structure ^  117 

New  Methods  of  Measuring  the  Speed  of  Sound  Pulses  Near  the 

Source.    Arthur  L.  Foley 221 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


326        Proceedings  of  Indiana  Academy  of  Science, 

N 

PAGE 

Noyes,  H.  A.     Colonies  for  a  Satisfactory  Soil  Plate ^^ 

Noyes,  H.  A.     Length  of  Time  to  Incubate  Petri  Plates 1?2 

Noyes,  H.  A.     Bacteria  in  Frozen  Soil 11^ 

Nelson,  James  C.    Plants  of  Boone  County,  Kentucky 125 

O 

Officers,  1919 10 

Officers,  List  of 12 

Oberholzer,  Harry  C.     A  Synopsis  of  the  Races  of  the  Guiana  Fly- 
catcher     304 

P 

President's  Address,  How  Should  the  Student  Body  Be  Recruited? 

E.  B.  Williamson 45 

Public  Offenses 9 

Program  of  Thirty-fourth  Annual  Meeting 37 

Physiography  and  War.    Wm.  A.  McBeth 60 

Pipal,  F.  J.     The  Barberry  and  Its  Relation  to  the  Stem  Rust  of 

Wheat    63 

Plants  of  Boone  County,  Kentucky.    James  C.  Nelson 125 

Plants  New  to  Indiana.    VIII.    Chas.  C.  Deam 144 

Phares,  V.  R.     Analyses  of  One  Hundred  Soils,  Allen  County,  In- 
diana   151 

Papish,  Jacob.     Flame  Reactions  of  Thallium 166 

Papish,  Jacob.     Sulphur  Dioxide  a  Source  of  Volcanic  Sulphur 170 

Palentology  of  Certain   Chester  Formations  in   Southern   Indiana, 

Notes  on  the.    Allen  D.  Hole 183 

Certain   Protozoa   and   Other  Invertebrates   of   Lake  Maxinkuckee. 

Barton  W.  Evermann  and  Howard  W.  Clark 236 

Purdue,  Alfred  Homer,  Memorial  of.     George  H.  Ashley 247 

Physical  Science  to  Military  Efficiency,  Some  Contributions  of. 

C.  M.  Smith 320 

R 

Richards,  A.    Evolutionary  Philosophy  and  the  German  War 71 

The  Relation  of  Nitrogen,  Phosphorus  and  Organic  Matter  to  Corn 

Yield.     R.  H.  Carr  and  Leroy  Hoffman 160 

Remnant  Monument  Near  Madison.     Elmer  G.  Sulzer 310 

Ramsay,  R.  R.    A  Kinetic  Model  of  the  Electron  Atom 312 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


hidex.  327 

S 

PAGE 

Sulphur  Dioxide  a  Source  of  Volcanic  Sulphur.    Jacob  Papish 170 

Soil  Survey  of  Cass  County,  Indiana.    Colonzo  C.  Beals 186 

A  Synopsis  of  the  Races  of  the  Guiana  Flycatcher.    Harry  C.  Ober- 

holzer 304 

Sulzer,  Elmer  G.     Erosional  Freaks  of  the  Saluda  Limestone 309 

Sulzer,  Elmer  G.    Remnant  Monument  Near  Madison 310 

Smith,  C.  M.     Some  Contributions  of  Physical  Science  to  Military 

Efficiency    320 

T 

Timmons  George  D.,  In  Memoriam.     L.  F.  Bennett 79 

Time  to  Incubate  Petri  Plates,  The  Length  of.    H.  A.  Noyes,  Edwin 

Voight  and  J.  D.  Luckett 102 

Trueblood,  R.  B.     Prof.  M.  J.  Golden 258 

Some  Trees  of  Indiana.     F.  M.  Andrews 261 

V 

Voight,  Edwin.    Length  of  Time  to  Incubate  Petri  Plates 102 

The  Velocity  of  Sound  Waves  in  Tubes.    Arthur  L.  Foley 205 

W 

Williamson,  E.  B.     President's  Address 45 

Weatherwax,  Paul.    Method  of  Teaching  Diffusion  and  Osmosis ....  88 

Waterman,  Luther  Dana.     Arthur  L.  Foley 215 

Wilson,  Chas.  B.     The  Copepod  Parasites 230 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


^roccetJings  of  tfgt 

Inliiana  QlcaliemiJ 
of  Science 


tots 


Digitized  by' 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


Digiti 


zed  by  Google 


l&l 


;S3^/, 


m