1^1 ^ miJiiiiiEHE i^
^#eniiiSii^Hii{iis®i
ISIIBiHIISQIgll
BlIlllllQSigllE
mmmmmmni^m
ISIIEIiHIiSBIlll
illBn
(^B^nnjidiBiEZii^ii^
m
II
iiis#
Gc
977,
Odl
189=
M. L
G-^
3 1833 02559 6211
Gc 977.2 Odl 1395
'inde^pendent Order of Odd
j Fellows, Grand Lodge of
Proceedings of the R.W.
Grand Encampment . - .
GC
977.2
ODl,
1895,
MAY
Digitized by the Internet Archive
in 2010 with funding from
Allen County Public Library Genealogy Center
http://www.archive.org/details/proceedingsofmay1895inde
pIFTY=EIQHTH
Semi=Annual Communication
OF THE
Grand Lodge
I.O.O. R
^ 2LINDIANA.
HELD AT
Indianapolis, Ind.,
May 22d,
. . 1895 . .
Baker-Randolph Co., Printers, Indianapolis.
C\tf*'
^•^^^: .,,..-.
^30%^^-^Viti^^
Address of Grand Officers.
M. A. CHIPMAN Grand Master, Anderson.
C. F. NORTHERN Deputy Grand Master, Greensburg.
G. L. REINHARD Grand Warden, Indianapolis.
B. F. FOSTER Grand Secretary, Indianapolis.
JAS. A. WIIvDMAN Grand Treasurer, Indianapolis.
U. Z. WILEY G. REP. S. G. L., I. O. O. F., Fowler.
ENOCH G. HOGATE ....... G. Rep. S. G. L., I. O. O. F., Danville.
T. C. NEAL Grand Chapi^ain, North Manchester.
A. J. RUTLEDGE Grand Marshai, Newburg.
GEO. W. SOWERWINE Grand Conductor, Wilkinson.
OSCAR HADIvEY Grand Guardian, Plainfield.
FRED KIMBLEY Grand Herald, Orleans.
W. H. LEEDY Grand Instructor, Indianapolis.
I. O. O. F,
Kriicndshif>, Love and Trut^i.
PROCEEDINGS
Grand Lodge of Indiana
AT ITS
Fifty-Eighth Semi-Anniial Communication,
MAY 22, 1895.
Odd Fellows' Hall, )
Indianapolis, May 22, 1895. |
The Grand Lodge of Indiana, I. O. O. F., convened in
Semi- Annual Communication at 9 o'clock A. m., and was
called to order by M. A. Chipman, Grand Master.
The Grand Secretary reported a quorum present.
After singing the opening ode, and prayer by A. J.
Carey, Grand Chaplain, pro tern., C. F. Northern, Deputy
Grand Master, by order of the Grand Master, declared
the Grand Lodge duly open for the transaction of busi-
ness. .X,- C
S'e^ 8 0 ?.7 62 10
2290 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
\
The roll of Grand Officers was called and the toUowing
noted present :
M. A. CuiPMAN, Grand Master.
C. F. Northern, Deputy Grand Master.
G. L. Eeinhard, Grand "Warden.
B. V. Foster, Grand Secretary.
J AS. A. WiLDMAN, Grand Treasurer.
U. Z. Wiley, G. Rep. S. G. L., I. 0. 0. F.
Enoch G. Hogate, G. Rep. S. G. L., I. 0. 0 F.
A. J. RuTLEDGE, Grand Marshal.
Geo. W. Sowerwine, Grand Conductor.
Oscar Hadley, Grand Guardian.
Fred Kimbley, Grand Herald.
W. H. Leedy, Grand Iristructor.
The Grand Master appointed A. J. Carey Grand Chap-
lain, pro tern.
On motion of W. H. DeWolf, P. G. Kep,, the reading
of the Minutes of the last Communication was dispensed
with, the same having been printed and circulated.
The Grand Master then appointed the following
COMMITTEE ON CREDENTIALS.
P. G. J. E. Bodine of No. 124.
P. G. J. J. Lingle of No. 296.
P. G. A. C. Beecher of No. 159.
P. G. Harry C. Ray of No. 39.
P. G. W. I. Hughes of No. 222.
Which, on motion, was concurred in.
J. E. Bodine, P. G., from the Committee on Creden-
tials, submitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Loil(/c, J. O. O. F., of Indiana :
Your committee, to whom was referred the credentials of certain
Past Grands and Representatives, have examined the following,
and, finding them correct, would recommend their admission :
James F. Horton 1 P. G. and Rep
H. B. Davison 2 P. G. and Rep.
William H. Northcut :] P. G. and Rep
William Neaman 4 P. G and Rep.
ii073012
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2291
John H. Goldsmith 7 ,..P. G. and Rep
John H. Barrows 8 P. G. and Rep
Albert R. Wade 9 P. G. and Rep
W. J. Terry 10 P. G. and Rep
Fred Harper 11 P. G. and Rep
George M. Taylor 13 , P. G. and Rep
Phil Richards 14 P. G. and Rep
H. W. Eberhardt 15 P. G. and Rep
M. L. Bowmaster 17 P. G. and Rep
Chas.E. Rubush 18 P. G. and Rep
Joseph Pflieger 19 P. G. and Rep
James F. Lewis 20 P. G. and Rep
Charles E. Davis 22 P. G. and Rep
James A. Maudlin 23 P. G. and Rep
Lon Masters 24 P. G. and Rep
Mahlon L. Gephart 25 P. G. and Rep
William S. Thayer 28 P. G. and Rep
W. W. Meyer 29 P. G. and Rep
P. T. McCammon 30 P. G. and Rep
John C. White 31 P. G. and Rep
H. W. Robison 32 P. G. and Rep
F. Springman 33 P. G. and Rep
C. W. Merrill 34 . P. G. and Rep
Daniel M. Kinney .35 P. G. and Rep
J. W. Hewitt 36 P. G. and Rep
Amazon Ward 38 P. G. and Rep
Harry C. Vanway 39 P. G. and Rep
Charles W. King 40 P. G. and Rep
W. Kirman 41 P. G. and Rep
Edgar E. Kelsey 42 P. G. and Rep
George W. Hoftman 44 P. G. and Rep
A. E. Browning 45 P. G. and Rep
M. A. Dickover 46 P. G. and Rep
James P. Stinson 47 P. G. and Rep
Paul Howard 49 P. G. and Rep
Joe T. Akin 50 P. G. and Rep,
Wm. H. Bachelor ... 51 P. G. and Rep.
D. M. Butt 52 '....P. G. and Rep
H. G. Cole 55 P. G. and Rep.
Peter A. Marquart 56 P. G. and Rep
Joseph C. Russell 57 P. G. and Rep
Wm. F. Taylor 58 P. G. and Rep
Hugh L. Mullin 59 P. G. and Rep
David S. Mayer 60 P. G. and Rep
Samuel T. McDaniel 61 P. G. and Rep
M. Manley 62 P. G. and Rep
George Murray 63 P. G. and Rep
Wm. Lockhart 64.. P. G. and Rep
George Todd 66 P. G. and Rep
Charles Slagel 67 P. G. and Rep
J. P. Urbin 69. ..P. G. and Rep
M. T. Kelle^ 71 P. G. and Rep
Geo. Cunningham 71 P. G.
Andrew J. West 72 P. G. and Rep
2292 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
G. S. Henninger 73 P. G. and Rep.
William A. Meeker 74 P. G. and Rep.
Samuel Dunbar 75 P. G. and Rep.
A. Watson 76 P. G. and Rep.
John D. Stanford 77 P. G. and Rep.
Joseph A. Laming 77 P. G.
Henry M. Livingston 78 P. G. and Rep.
Arthur Johnson 80 P. G. 'and Rep.
Henry Ader , 81 P. G. and Rep.
A. A. Gillespie 82 P. G. and Rep.
Geo. B. Gardner, Jr 83 ....P. G. and Rep.
L. F. Powell 84 P. G. and Rep.
Louis Pelham 87 P. G and Rep.
Ed. McVaugh 88 P. G. and Rep.
H. N. Brown 89 P. G. and Rep.
A.I. Frank 92, P G. and Rep.
JohnPrather 94 P. G. and Rep.
W. A. Pruitt 95 P. G. and Rep.
E. E. Lawton 96 P. G. and Rep.
Samuel H. Hupp , 97 P. G. and Rep.
Edward G. McGraw 99 P. G. and Rep.
Thomas E. Houston 100 P. G. and Rep.
John Grames 101 P. G. and Rep.
R. W. Peters 102 P. G. and Rep.
Will Haas 103 P. G. and Rep.
E. H. Locke 104 P. G. and Rep.
H. W. Kline 105 P. G. and Rep.
Charles W. Davis 107 P. G. and Rep.
W. W. Ross 1(18 P. G. and Rep.
B. P. Sayers 110 P. G. and Rep.
J. 0. Bragg...: Ill P. G. and Rep.
J. R. Furgason 112 P. G. and Rep.
James A. Jenkins 113 P. G. and Rep.
Charles Lewis 114 P. G. and Rep.
John A. Pickel 115 P. G. and Rep.
John W. Meredith 120 P. G. and Rep.
James G. Demint 121 P. G. and Rep.
Frank M. Thorn..? 122 P. G. and Rep.
G. T. Pattison 123 P. G. and Rep.
Joseph Hall 124 P. G. and Rep.
James R. Christian 125 P. G. and Rep.
Thomas S. Leep 126 P. G. and Rep.
Charles Schabel 127 P. G. and Rep.
Henry A. Kolker 129 P. G. and Rep.
James L. Maxedon 130 P. G. and Rep.
A. Delkamp 131 P. G. and Rep.
Abin McDowell 133 P. G. and Rep.
W. R. Hickman 134 P. G. and Rep.
Albert White 135 P. G. and Rep.
Gains L. Howell.. 136 P. G. and Rep.
E. F. Haxton 137 P. G and Rep.
Lewis Ellerbusch 138 P. G- and Rep.
Ira T. Trusler 139 P. G. and Rep.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2293
James A. Karney 140 V. G. and Rep
A. W. Funkhouser .....142 P. G. and Rep
William H. Hoover 143 P. G. and Rep
David W. Shields 143 P. G.
John F. Richardson 144 P. G. and Rep
T. J. Cartwright 145 P. G. and Rep
F. M. Partin 146 P. G. and Rep
Robert Calvert 147 P. G. and Rep
Matthias Chirstman 149 P. G. and Rep
Thomas E. Lamb 150 P. G. and Rep
Henry Richter 151 P. G. and Rep.
William W. Carter 152 P. G. and Rep
D. H. Mcintosh 154 P. G. and Rep
Thomas Cassey 155 P. G. and Rep
William Gipe 156 P. G. and Rep
R. S. Brown 157 , P. G. and Rep
Samuel Elder 158 ....P. G. and Rep
H. T. Storn 158 P. G.
Chas A. Billman 159 P. G. and Rep
W. B. Harney 163 P. G. and Rep
W. B. Roderick 164 P. G. and Rep
William Kelly 165 P. G. and Rep
William Brookshire 166 P. G. and Rep
J. F. Mann 167 P. G. and Rep
Henry Taylor 168 P. G. and Rep
C. A. Moore.... 169 P. G. and Rep
W. A. Knapp 170 P. G. and Rep
John R. Harris 171 P. G. and Rep
Ed. Chance 172 P. G. and Rep
S. A. Jett 173 P. G. and Rep
Harry McCain 174 P. G. and Rep
R. C. Hammonder 175 P. G. and Rep
E. R. Meely 176 P. G. and Rep
August Uncle 177 P. G. and Rep
Warner Barkus 178 P. G. and Rep
Nial R. Nye 179 P. G. and Rep
William H. Lane 180 P. G. and Rep
J. T. Raskins *. 181 P. G. and Rep
Joseph A. Myers 182 P, G. and Rep
David H. Lutz ,...183 P. G. and Rep
E. A. Bunton 184 P. G. and Rep
C. R. Beck 187 P. G. and Rep
D. P. Etris 188 P. G. and Rep
John W. Eller.. 189 ..P. G. and Rep
Woodson Thrasher 190 P. G. and Rep
C. B. Hollingsworth 191 P. G. and Rep
Charles Morgan ,.192 P. G. and Rep.
W. J. Parrish 193 P. G. and Rep.
George M. Fowler 194 * P. G. and Rep.
S. P. Vanwinkle 195 P. G. and Rep.
James Kampel 196 P. G. and Rep
David Worland 197 P. G and Rep
Geo. W. Christian 198 P. G. and Rep
John Burkhardt 199 P. G. and Rep
2294 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
J. N. Decker 200 P. G. and Rep
William D. Helms 202 P. G. and Rep
A. W. Richey 203 P. G. and Rep
W. E. Hoadley 204 P. G. and Rep
M. F. Jones 205 P. G. and Rep
Jacob Trumpi 206 P. G. and Rep
John H. Rutenour 208 P. G. and Rep
Charles A. Wright .209 P. G. and Rep
William Gulzon 210 P. G. and Rep
Chas. Headley 211 P. G. and Rep
T. F. Ranceran 213 P. G. and Rep
Bailey M. Almon 214 P. G. and Rep
Charles Hammerstein 215 P. G. and Rep
L. E. Acker 217 P. G. and Rep
J. A. Swoveland 220 P. G. and Rep
George Shafer 221 P. G. and Rep
J. F. Brenaman 222 P. G. and Rep,
C. A. Miller 223 P. G. and Rep
C. H. Hockersmith 224 P. G. and Rep
A. J. Shirley 225 P. G. and Rep
A. T. Gardner 227 P. G. and Rep
Ferdinand Henkell 228 P. G. and Rep
John Tlueckiger 229 P. G. and Rep
Enoch M. Shockley 231 P. G. and Rep
John EI. Mayer 232 P. G. and Rep
Joseph C. Morgan 233 P. G. and Rep
Nathan Johnson 233 P. G.
Jacob Hahn 234 P. G. and Rep
D. A. Jordan 235 P. G. and Rep
John H. McCafferty..." 236 P. G. and Rep
Elijah Arthur 236 P. G.
A. D. Moore 237 P. G. and Rep
F. G. Smith 238 P. G. and Rep
Eugene Burch ...239 P. G. and Rep
John M. Lindsey 240 P. G. and Rep
E. M. Shockley 241 .P. G. and Rep
John Carpenter 242 P. G. and Rep
J. E. Heinmiller 243 .'. P. G. and Rep
J. J. Schofield 244 P. G. and Rep
Henry Worley 245 P. G. and Rep
Perry Roeers 246 P. G. and Rep
A. B. Barnard 247 P. G. and Rep
T. W. Baldwin 248 P. G. and Rep
F. B. Chamberlain 250 P. G. and Rep
John Green 251 P. G. and Rep
G. H. Timmons 252 P. G. and Rep
George W. Miller 253 P. G. and Rep
Frank Farmer , ...254 P. G. and Rep
Harvey J. Catt 255 P. G. and Rep
L; L. Lampkin 257 P. G. and Rep
Roller Johnson 259 P. G. and Rep
A. C. Willoughby 260 P. G. and Rep
William D. Corry 263 P. G. and Rep
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2295
J. W. Keane 264 P. G. and Rep.
Joseph Dunphy 265 P. G. and Rep.
David L. Pigeon 266 P. G. and Rep.
Marion Moore 267... P. G. and Rep.
William S. McCrum 268 P. G. and Rep.
John F. Kamman 270 P. G. and Rep.
William J. Merrifield 271 P. G. and Rep.
Adam Laun 272 P. G. and Rep.
John Meissnest 273 ......P. G. and Rep.
F. M. McNair 274 P. G. and Rep.
Jacob Crabbs 275 P. G. and Rep.
J. E. Jones 276 P. G. and Rep.
Edward S. Hill 277 P. G. and Rep.
Frederick Hermann 278 P. G. and Rep.
James Mathews 279 P. G. and Rep.
0. A. Curry 280 P. G. and Rep.
Theodore Bailey 281 P. G. and Rep.
Frank L. Kiplinger 282 P. G. and Rep.
John Goodin ...; 283 P. G. and Rep.
William Townsend 284 P. G. and Rep.
James 0. Hurst 285 P. G. and Rep.
John E. Neese 285 P. G.
A. D. McKnight 286 P. G. and Rep.
W. T. Taylor 287 P. G. and Rep.
H. W. Abbott 288 P. G. and Rep.
George Lommell 289 P. G. and Rep.
Isaac L. Riley 290, P. G. and Rep.
C. W. Emerson 291 P. G. and Rep.
T. A. Green 292 P. G. and Rep.
John A Fountain 293 P. G. and Rep.
Ben Peason : 294 P. G. and Rep.
Frank Sexton 295 P. G. and Rep.
Thomas J. Scully 296 P. G. and Rep.
W. S. Circle 297 P. G. and Rep.
T. C. Johnson 298 P. G. and Rep.
Joseph Forsythe 300 P. G. and Rep.
Sampson Shuey 301 P. G. and Rep.
C. L. Hefner 304 P. G. and Rep.
T. W. Day 305 P. G. and Rep.
D. G. Dean 306 P. G. and Rep.
George W. Kane 307 P. G. and Rep.
John Cotteral 308 P. G. and Rep.
L. H. Fenwick 309 P. G. and Rep.
Eli S. F. Wasson 310 P. G. and Rep.
F. M. Williams 312 P. G. and Rep.
William Ramer 314 P. G. and Rep.
A. A. France 316 P. G. and Rep.
Roberts. Rhea 317 P. G. and Rep.
Samuel Shuffelbarger 318 P. G. and Rep.
Simon Donges 319 P. G. and Rep.
G. B. Noland 320 P. G. and Rep.
W. W. Berden 321 P. G. and Rep.
G. W. Bell 322 P. G. and Rep.
Lea Acuft 323 P. G. and Rep.
2296 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
C. S. Goar 324 P. G. and Rep.
L. D. Holliday 325 P. G. and Rep,
W. C. Hamper 328 P. G. and Rep
F. W. Verbarg 329 P. G. and Rep
H. H. Brunt 330 P. G, and Rep,
Jesse Grice 331 P. G. and Rep
William McLaren 333 P. G. and Rep
Oscar Jocking... 334 P. G. and Rep
D. R. Barnell 335 P. G. and Rep
Jacob Goerlitz 336 P. G. and Rep
Thos. J. White 338 P. G. and Rep
A. H. Davidson 338 P. G.
George R. Bryant 340 P. G. and Rep
E. F. Healy 341 P. G. and Rep
James M. Waters 342 P. G. and Rep,
Wilhelm Krensel 343 P. G. and Rep,
Andrew N. Wolf 344 P. G. and Rep
Lewis Hillis 345 P. G. and Rep,
B. F. Butler 346 P. G. and Rep
M. M. Hutto 347 P. G. and Rep
W. Z. Hillis 348 P. G: and Rep
Frank P. R. Zimmerman 350 P. G. and Rep
William J. Smith 352 P. G. and Rep
B C. Selby 353 P. G. and Rep
W. G. Pray 354 P. G. and Rep
W. J. Markland 355 P. G. and Rep
R. H. Washburn 356 P. G. and Rep
Nathan Fisher 357 P. G. and Rep,
Samuel Summerville 358 P. G. and Rep,
Charles Birkhatters 359 P. G. and Rep,
James H. Hout 360 P. G. and Rep
T. M. Wingate 361 P. G. and'Rep
Clinton Rogers 362 P. G. and Rep
J. L. Monroe 363 P. G. and Rep
Jacob Butterbaugh 365 P. G. and Rep
L. M. Brown 367 P. G. and Rep
Henry H. Heacox 368 P. G. and Rep
Winfield W. Mullen 369 P. G. and Rep
L. C. Frederick 370 P. G. and Rep
Orland L. Cline 373 P. G. and Rep
Jesse P. Kendall 374 P. G. and Rep
R. S. Records 375 P. G. and Rep
Jacob Smith. 376 P. G. and Rep
Francis H. Wartoff 376 P. G.
Will Veach 377 P. G. and Rep
D. M. Pulver 378 P. G. and Rep
A. J. Hopkins 379 P. G. and Rep
F. P. Engle 380 P. G. and Rep
Harlan Hisley 381 P. G. and Rep
N. Stein, Jr 382 P. G. and Rep
Carl Lewis 383 P. G. and Rep
Thomas Bristow 384.. P. G. and Rep
James P. McWilliams 386 P. G. and Rep
J. W. Burrell 387 P. G. and Rep
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2297
G. F. Jones 389 P. G. and Kep.
R. F. Custer 390 P. G. and Rep.
James A. Horton 391 P. G. and Rep.
F. M. Wall 392 ! P. G. and Rep.
Charles E. Moody 394 P. G. and Rep.
George W. Lewis 397 P. G. and Rep.
F. C. Gray 399 P. G. and Rep.
William Sloppy 400 P. G. and Rep.
B. H. Cook 401 P. G. and Rep.
Solomon Arnsberger 403 P. G. and Rep.
Ellsworth Collins 404 P. G. and Rep.
L. E. Hardy 405 P. G. and Rep.
Henry C. Ross 40G P. G. and Rep.
William J. Harris 407 P. G, and Rep.
William L. Brewer.. ,..,., 408 P. G. and Rep.
C. Q. Twibell 410 P. G. and Rep.
W. H. Boyer 411 P. G. and Rep.
James F. Mattingly 412 P. G. and Rep.
Jesse A. Holmes 413 P. G. and Rep.
C. D. Muberline 413 P. G.
C. W.Stewart 415 P. G. and Rep.
Thomas Moore 416 P. G. and Rep.
J A. Anheir 417 P. G. and Rep.
H. W. Royce 419 P. G. and Rep.
James S. Smith 420 P. P. and Rep.
J. R. Davis 421. P. G. and Rep.
J. W. Brock 425 P. G. and Rep.
T. W. Crickle 426 V. G. and Rep.
Arthur McMahan 428 P. G. and Rep.
Leyi Zernburn 430 P. G. and Rep.
F. S. Byers 431 P. G. and Rep.
R. S. Armington 432 P. G. and Rep.
David W. Patterson 433 P. G. and Rep.
P. E.Sanders 434 P. G. and Rep.
George W. Weir 435 P. G. and Rep.
Wes McDaniel ...,437 P. G. and Rep.
William Carr 438 P. G. and Rep.
Aaron Stanfielcl 439 P. G. and Rep.
Thomas Gibson 440 P. G. and Rep.
John R. Karner 442^ P. G. and Rep.
D. B. Beanblossom 443 P. G. and Rep.
Stephen Crasier 444 P. G. and Rep.
William H. Good 445 P. G. and Rep.
Robin Proctor 447.... P. G. and Rep.
John E. Parritt 448 P. G. and Rep.
Worth Mewhinney 449 P G. and Rep.
William Rentzel 452 P. G. and Rep.
George F. Emma 453 P. G. and Rep.
T. P. Conn 455 P. G. and Rep.
P. C. Jolly 456 P. G. and Rep.
James Byers.. 457 P. G. and Rep.
J. L Custer 458 P. G. and Rep.
John B, Morris , 460 P. G. and Rep.
Edgar A. Adams 461 P G. and Rep.
2298 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ,
E. C. Laughlin. 463 P. G. and Kep
William Kemp 464 P. G. and Kep
James M. Barkley .465 P. G. and Rep
J. F. Lewis 466 P. G. and Rep
John D. Nash 467 P. G. and Rep.
J. W. Edwards 468 P. G. and Rep
Wm. E. Wells 470 P. G. and Rep.
J. T. Sutton 471 P. G. and Rep.
G. W. Myers 472 P. G. and Rep
G. C. Davidson 473 P. G. and Rep
James F. Morris 475 P. G. and Rep
James B. Holmes 476 P. G. and Rep.
Alonzo Shanks 477 P. G. and Rep
Alonzo N. Doty 478 P. G. and Rep
John F. Ashton 479 P. G. and Rep.
F. E. Bennett 480 P. G. and Rep.
Melvin Ice 481 P. G. and Rep.
Samuel Goodknight 482 P. G. and Rep
Wm. Smith 484 P. G. and Rep.
Charles E. Davis 4S5 P. G. and Rep
Harley B. Stewart 486 P. G. and Rep
W. T. Timmons 487 P. G. and Rep
N. C. Apgar 488 P. G. and Rep.
W. J. Beeson 493 P. G. and Rep.
J. R. Prather 494 P. G. and Rep.
F. L. Miller 495 P. G. and Rep,
Abraham Collins 498 P. G. and Rep.
Francis Doughty 499 P. G. and Rep,
J. M. Swarthout 499 P. G.
George H. Butler 500 P. G. and Rep.
J. A. Sudderth 501 P. G. and Rep.
R. E. Simmons 503 P. G. and Rep.
Joseph Court : 504 P. G. and Rep.
J. B. McCartney 505 P. G. and Rep.
Hiram B. Bridge 506 P. G. and Rep.
H. Hunt 507 P. G. and Rep.
Jesse Ballard 508 P. G. and Rep.
Addison W. Lewis 509 P. G. and Rep.
Luther T. Hale....: 510 F. G. and Rep.
Joseph Cropper 511 P. G. and Rep.
AlexSpinks 512 P. G. and Rep.
W. C. Smith 513 P. G. and Rep.
John T. Smith 513 P. G.
Edgar A. Phipps 514 P. G. and Rep.
Jerry Guinee 515 P. G. and Rep
George Emmons 516 P. G. and Rep
Jesse A. Holloway 517 P. G. and Rep
N. E. Austin 521 P: G. and Rep.
Jonathan Giffy 522 P. G. and Rep.
Harvey Wirtz 523 P. G. and Rep
John k. Wilson 524 P. G. and Rep
Michael Crow 525 P. G. and Rep
John A. McMahan 526 P. G. and Rep
George Phillipps 527 P. G. and Rep
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2299
C. W. Fisher 528 P. G. and Rep.
Michael Melbert 529 P. G. and Rep.
Robert Allen 530 P. G. and Rep.
Fred Hauser 531 P. G. and Rep.
M. C. Gregory 532 P. G. and Rep.
Jerome H. Scott 533 P. G. and Rep.
Orvin Klepper 534 P. G. and Rep.
A. E. Smith 535 P. G. and Rep.
T. M. Cottingham 536 P. G. and Rep.
T. D. W. Manchester 537 P. G. and Rep.
Lafayette Iliff 539 P. G. and Rep.
F. P. Foor 540 P. G. and Rep.
Fred Snyder 541 P. G. and Rep.
Samuel Fettinger 543 P. G. and Rep.
0. C. Larue 544 P. G. and Rep.
W. E. Buckner '. 545 P G. and Rep.
John Bennett 546 P. G. and Rep.
Truman Dason 547 P. G. and Rep.
Mason Todd... 548 P. G. and Rep.
Thomas J. Brown 549 P. G. and Rep,
William Martin 549 P. G.
George W. Burton 550 P. G. and Rep.
Benton C. Howell 551 P. G. and Rep.
C. R. Burroughs 552 P. G. and Rep.
Emmons Low 553 P. G. and Rep.
D B. Fox : 554 P. G. and Rep.
Amos L. Ray 555 P. G. and Rep.
George T. Townsley 556 P. G. and Rep.
D. H. Thiby 557 P. G. and Rep.
James E. Trinkle 558 P. G. and Rep.
George W. Lyons 559 P. G. and Rep.
Frank Nottingham 561 P. G. and Rep.
Henry L. Arnold 563 P. G. and Rep.
A. A. Rogers 564 P. G. and Rep.
James E. Twineham 565 P. G and Rep.
Alonzo Yates 566 P. G. and Rep.
William A. Bingaman 567 P. G. and Rep.
John Higley 568 P. G. and Rep.
William Vandiver 569 P. G. and Rep.
Henry A. Watts 570 P. G. and Rep.
R. L. Peltz 571 P. G. and Rep.
T. E. Littell 572 P. G. and Rep.
W. S. Canfield 573 P. G. and Rep.
Wm. F. Bopp 574 P. G. and Rep.
L. W. Myers 576 P. G. and Rep.
E. Wilson 577 P. G. and Rep.
J. D. Weddell 578 P. G. and Rep.
J. F. Pepper 579 P. G. and Rep.
F. A. Day 580 P. G. and Rep.
James D. Smith 581 P. G. and Rep.
B. F. Lance ' 582 P. G. and Rep.
O. W. Crow' 584 P. G. and Rep.
B. F. Hardin ,586 P. G. and Reg.
Thomas L. Imes 587 P. G. and Rep.
2300 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
J. W. Guiney 588 P. G. and Rep.
Benjamin Douglass 589 P. G. and Rep
M. Boland 591 P. G. and Rep
L. A. Vranbarger 592 P. G. and Rep
J. A. McLeland 593 P. G. and Rep
B. 0. Burkett 593 P. G.
E. B. Brown 594 P. G. and Rep
Wm. Denny 595 P. G. and Rep
L. W. Teabarger 595 P. G.
Andrew Arrick 598 P. G. and Rep
S. C. Keel 600 P. G. and Rep,
H. B. Dryer 601 P. G. and Rep
H. E. Gettil 602 P. G. and Rep
Charles Barnhart .603 P. G. and Rep
G. W. Scott 604 P. G. and Rep
Geo. H. Leaman 605 P. G. and Rep
PaulNast 606 P. G. and Rep
A. J. Daniels 60S P. G. and Rep
H. J. St. Clair 609 P. G. and Rep
W. S. Chapman 610 P. G. and Rep
James M. Austin 611 P. G. and Rep
Frank Holliday 612 P. G. and Rep
Charles Martin 613 P. G. and Rep
Geo. W. Clark 614 P. G. and Rep
C. T. Mahan 615 P. G. and Rep
John Handford 616 P. G. and Rep
Wilson Brugh 618 P. G. and Rep
George Gunn. 619 P. G. and Rep
H. C. Rundell 621 P. G. and Rep
Daniel McClannahan 622 P. G. and Rep
U. I. Newkirk 623 P. G. and Rep
Amos Musselman ...624 P. G. and Rep
Isaac Pennington 625 P. G. and Rep
Calvin McCoy 626 P. G. and Rep
William T. Bennett 627 P. G. and Rep
W. S. Pigg 628 P. G. and Rep
Curtis Mourer 629 P. G. and Rep
W. H. H. Tucker 630 P. G. and Rep
Jacob Bozarth 631 P. G. and Rep
P. V. Bardin 632 P. G. and Rep
Robert Pilkington 633 P. G. and Rep
I. N. Veley 634 ' P. G. and Rep
William Jarboe 635 P. G. and Rep
William F. Norwood 636 P. G. and Rep
H. D. Hunt 637 P. G. and Rep
John A. Tracey 638 P. G. and Rep
James Parsell 639 P. G. and Rep
John Reed 640 P. G. and Rep
William E. King 641 P. G. and Rep
J. J. Archer 642 P. G. and Rep
F. C. Pursley 643 P. G. and Rep
William Graper 644 P. G. and Rep
Charles W. Akers 645 P. G. and Rep
S. A. Singleton 646 P. G. and Rep
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2301
Lewis Fry 647.... P. G. and Eep.
F. J. Sanxter 648 P. G. and Rep.
John F. Zimmerman 649 P. G. and Rep.
E.G. Deeds 650 P. G. and Rep.
S. S. Heiny 651 P. G. and Rep.
I. N. Rich 652 P. G. and Rep.
James Boyle 653 P. G. and Rep.
0. C. Richey ,654 P. G. and Rep.
W. C. Aldridge 655 P. G. and Rep.
Ora Cheek 656 P. G. and Rep.
Charles Meador 658 P. G. and Rep.
John R. Fisher 659 P. G. and Rep.
C. C. Wright 660 P. G. and Rep.
James Wallis 661 P. G. and Rep.
Judson Wagstaft 663 P. G. and Rep.
Charles Appleman 664 P. G. and Rep.
H. D. Nicewanger 665 P. G. and Rep.
John Harris .666 P. G. and Rep.
Nathan A. Lindley 667 P. G. and Rep.
Amos Junod 668 P. G. and Rep.
Charles E. Wiesehan 669 P. G. and Rep.
Anderson Percifield 670 P. G. and Rep.
William T. Grattan 670 P. G.
C. A. Jenkins 671 P. G. and Rep.
A. L. Watkins 672 P. G. and Rep.
T. D. Tour 673 P. G. and Rep.
David M. Patterson 674 P. G. and Rep.
Josiah Bell 674 P. G.
J. M. Burlingame 675 P. G. and Rep.
Wilhelm Kuhn 676 P. G, and Rep.
Herbert E. Jones 677 P. G. and Rep.
Andrew Cook 678 P. G. and Rep.
F. J. Bowell 679 P. G. and Rep.
Melvin Tucker ...680 P. G. and Rep.
M. H. Sample 681 P. G. and Rep.
Dean Acuflf 682 P. G. and Rep.
Edwin Heller 683 P. G. and Rep.
Edward Terhune 684 P. G. and Rep.
J. F. Drake 685 P. G. and Rep.
Thomas Hudson -...686 P. G. and Rep.
George Ridlen 687 P. G. and Rep.
Major Taylor 687 P. G.
B. Bollinger 688 P. G. and Rep.
Mark Knapp 689 P. G. and Rep.
William H. Sapp 690 P. G. and Rep.
J. B. Cottrell 691 P. G. and Rep.
Geo. A. Brugh 692 P. G. and Rep.
Lewis E. Hughes 692 P. G.
N. G. Willis 693 P. G. and Rep.
B. W. Murphy 694 P. G. and Rep.
J. T. Sparks 695 P. G.
F. M. Shull 695 P. G. and Rep.
George Paugh 696 P. G. and Rep.
James P. Culver 697 P. G. and Rep.
2302 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
Thomas Conley 698 P. G. and Rep.
James C. Shelly 699 P. G. and Rep.
John W. Hetzer 700 P. G. and Rep.
H. P. Hopkins 701 P. G. and Rep
H. C. Summers 7Ul P. G.
Albert Herbst ,.702 P. G. and Rep.
P. A. Dailey 703 P. G. and Rep.
Francis M. Ferrell 705 P. G. and Rep.
I. N. Shake 706 P. G. and Rep.
J. C. Coulter 707 P. G. and Rep.
Thomas L. Patrick 708 P. G. and Rep.
Which, on motion, was concurred in.
The following Past Grands and Representatives, being
in waiting, were introduced by the Grand Marshal, and
were duly instructed in the Past Official and Grand Lodge
Degrees by the Grand Warden, assisted by the Grand In-
structor :
James F. Horton, of No. 1; William H. Northcut, of No. 3;
William Neaman, of No. 4; John H. Goldsmith, of No. 7;
John H. Barrows, of No. 8; Albert R. Wade, of No. 9; W. J.
Terry, of No. 10; George M. Taylor, of No. 13; Phil Richards, of
No. 14; H. W. Eberhardt, of No. 15; M. L. Bowmaster, of
No. 17; Chas. E. Rubush, of No. 18; Joseph Pflieger, of No.
19; James F. Lewis, of No. 20; Charles E. Davis, of No.
22; James A. Maudlin, of No. 23; Lon Masters, of No. 24;
Mahlon L. Gephart, of No 25; William S. Thayer, of No. 28;
W. W. Meyer, of No. 29; P. T. McCammon, of No. 30; John C.
White, of No. 31; H. W. Robison, of No. 32; F. Springman, of No.
33; C.W. Merrill, of No. 34; Daniel M. Kinney, of No. 35; J.W. Hewitt,
of No. 36; Amazon Ward, of No. 38; Harry C. Vanway, of No. 39;
Charles W. King, of No. 40; W. Kirman, of No. 41; Edgar E. Kel-
sey, of No. 42; George W. Hoflman, of No. 44; M. G. Fact, of No.
45 ; M. A. Dickover, of No. 46 ; James P. Stinson, of No. 47 ; Paul
Howard, of No. 49; Joe T. Akin, of No. 50; William H. Bachelor,
of No. 51; D. M. Butt, of No. 52; H. G. Cole, of No. 55; Peter A.
Marquart, of No. 56; Joseph C. Russell, of No. 57; William F. Tay-
lor, of No. 58; Hugh L. Mullin, of No. 59; David S. Mayer, of No.
60; Samuel T. McDaniel, of No. 62 ; M. Manley, of No. 62; George
Murray, of No. 63; William Lockhart, of No. 64; George Todd, of
No. 66; Charles Slagel, of No. 67; J. P. Urbin, of No. 69; M. T.
Kelley, of No. 71; George Cunningham of No. 71; Andrew J. West,
of No. 72; G. S. Henninger, of No. 73; William A. Meeker, of No.
74; Samuel Dunbar, of No. 75; A. Watson, of No. 76; John D.
Stanford, of No. 77; Joseph A. Laming, of No. 77; Henry M. Liv-
ingston, of No. 78; Arthur Johnson, of No. 80; Henry Ader,
of No. 81; A. A. Gillespie, of No. 82; George B. Gardner, Jr., of
No. 83; L. F. Powell, of No. 84; Louis Pelham, of No. 87;
Ed. McVaugh, of No. 88; H. N. Brown, of No. 89; A. J. Frank, of
No. 92; John Prather, of No. 94 : W. A. Pruitt, of No. 95; E, E.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2303
Lawton, of No. 96; Samuel H. Hupp, of No. 97; Edward G. Mc-
Graw, No. 99; Thomos E. Houston, No. 100; John Grames, No. 101,
R. W. Peters, of No. 102; Will Haas, of No. 103; E. H. Locke
of No. 104; H. W. Kline, of No. 105; Charles W. Davis, of No. 107:
W. W. Ross, of No. 108; B. P. Sayers, of No. 110; J. 0. Bragg, of No
1U; J. R. Furgason of No. 112; James A. Jenkins, of No. 113
•Charles Lewis, of No. 114; John A. Pickel, of No. 115; John W
Meredith, of No. 120; James G. Demint, of No. 121; Frank M
Thorn, of No. 122; G. T. Pattison, of No. 123; Joseph Hall, of No
124; James R. Christian, of No. 121; Thomas S. Leep, of No. 126
Charles Schabel, of No. 127; Henry A. Kolker, of No. 129
James L. Maxedon, of No. 130; A. Delkamp, of No. 131
Abin McDowell, of No. 133; W. R. Hickman, of No. 134
Albert White, of No. 135; Gains L. Howell, of No. 136;
E. T. Haxton, of No. 137; Lewis Ellerbusch, of No. 138; Ira T
Trusler, of No. 139; James A. Karney, of No. 140; A. W. Funk
houser, of No. 142; William H. Hoover, of No. 143; David W
Shields, of No. 148; John F. Richardson, of No. 144; T. J. Cart
Wright, of No. 145; F. M. Partin, of No. 146; Robert Calvert, of No
147; Matthias Christman, of No. 149; Thomas E. Lamb, of No. 150;
Henry Richter, of No. 151 William W. Carter, of No. 152; D. H.
Mcintosh, of No. 154; Thomas Cassey, of No. 155; William Gife, of
No. 156; R. R. Brown, of No. 157; Samuel Elder, of No. 158; H. F.
Stern, of No. 158; Chas. A. Billman, of No. 159; W. B. Harney, of
No. 163; W. B. Roderick, of No. 104; William Kelly, of No. 165;
William Brookshire, of No. 166; J. F. Mann, of No. 167; Henry
Taylor, of No. 168; C. A. Moore, of No. 169; W. A. Knapp, of
No. 170; John R. Harris, of No. 171; Ed. Chance, of No. 172;
S. A. Jett, of No. 173; Harry McCain, of No. 174; R. C. Ham-
monder, of No. 175; E. R. Meeley, of No. 176; August Uncle, of No.
177; Warner BarkUs, of No. 178; Nial R. Nye, of No. 179; William
H. Lane, of No. 180; J. T. Raskins, of No. 181; Joseph A.
Myers, of No. 182; David H. Lutz, of No. 183; E. A. Bun-
ton, of No. 184; C. R. Beck, of No. 187; D. P. Etris, of No.
188; John W. El'ler, of No. 189; Woodson Thrasher, of No. 190;
C. B. Hollingsworth, of No. 191; Charles Morgan, of No.
192; W. J. Parrish, of No. 193; George M. Fowler, of No. 194;
S. P. Fan winkle, of No. 195; James Kampel, of Nb. 196; David
Worland, of No. 197; Geo. W. Christian, of No. 198; John Burkhart,
of No. 199; J. N. Decker, of No. 200; William D. Helms of No. 202;
A. W. Richey, of No. 203; W. E. Hoadley, of No. 204; M. F. Jones,
of No. 205; Jacob Trempi, of 206; John H. Rutenour, of No. 208;
Charles A. Wright, of 209; William Gulzon of No. 210; Chas. Head-
ley of No. 211; T. F. Ranceran of No. 213; Bailey M. Almon, of
No. 214; Charles Hammerstein, of No. 215; L. E. Acker, of No. 217;
J. A. Swoveland, of No. 220; George Shafer, of No. 221; J. F.
Brennaman, of No. 222; C. A. Miller, of No. 223; C. H. Hocker-
smith, of No. 224; A. J. Shirley, of No. 225i; A. T. Gardner, of No.
227; Ferdinand Henkell, of No. 228; John Flueckiger, of No. 229;
Enoch M. Shockley, of No. 231; John H. Mayer, of No. 232;
Joseph C. Morgan, of No. 233; Nathan Johnson, of No. 233; Jacob
Hahn, of No. 234; D. A. Jordan, of No. 235; John H. McCafferty,
of No. 236; Elijah Arthur, of No. 236; A. D. Moore, ot No. 237;
F. G. Smith, of No. 238; Eugene Burch, of No. 239; John M.
2304 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
Lindsey, of No. 240; John Carpenter, of No. 242; J. E. Heinmiller,
of No. 243; J. J. Schofield, of No. 244; Henry Worley, of No. 245;
Perry Rogers, of No. 246; T. W. Baldwin, of No. 248; A. B. Barnard,
of No. 247; F. B. Chamberlain, of No. 250; John Green, of No. 251;
G. H. Timmons, of No. 252; George W. Miller, of No. 253; Frank
Farmer, of No. 254; Harvey J. Catt, of No. 255; L. L. Lampkin, of
No. 257; Roller Johnson, of No. 259; A. C. Willoughby, of No. 260;
William D. Corry, of No. 260; J. W. Ream, of No. 264; Joseph
Dunphy, of No. 265; J. E. Pedigo, of No. 266; David L. Pigeon, of
No. 266; Marion Moore, of No. 267; William S. McCrum,
of No. 268; John F. Kamman, of No. 2T0; William S.
Merrifield, of No. 271; Adam Laun, of No. 272; John
Meissnest, of No. 273; F. M. McNair, of No. 274; Jacob Crabbs,
of No. 275, J. E. Jones, of No. 276; Edward S. Hill, of No. 277;
Frederick Hermann, of No. 278; James Mathews, of No. 279; 0.
A. Curry, of No. 280; Theodore Bailey, of No, 281; Frank L. Kip-
linger, No. 282; John Goodin, No. 283; William Townsend, No. 284;
James 0. Hurst, of No. 285; John E. Neese, of No. 285; A. D. Mc-
Knight, of No. 286; W. T. Taylor, of No. 287; H. W. Abbott, of No.
288; George Lommell, of No. 289; Isaac L. Riley, of No. 290; C. W.
Emerson, of No. 291; T. A. Green, of No. 292; John A. Fountain,
of No. 293; Ben Pearson, of No. 294; Frank Sexton, of No. 295;
Thos. J. Scully, of No. 296; W. S. Circle, of No. 297; T. C. Johnson, of
No. 298; Jos. Forsythe, of No. 300, Sampson Shuey, of No. 301; C.
L. Hefner, of No. 304; T. W. Day, of No. 305; D. G. Dean, of No. 306;
George W. Kane, of No. 307; John Cotteral, of No. 308; L. H. Fen-
wick, of 300; Eli S. F. Wasson, of No. 310; F. M. Williams, of No.
312; William Ramer, of No. 314; A. A. France, of No. 316; Robert
E. Rhea, of No. 317; Samuel Shuffelbarger, of No. 318; Simon
Donges, of No. 319; G. B. Noland, of No. 320; W. W. Berden, of
No. 321; G. W. Bell, of No. 322; Lea Acuff, of No. 323; C. S. Goar,
of No. 324; L. D. Holliday, of No. 325; W. C. Hamper, of No. 328;
F. W. Verbarg, of No. 329; H. H. Brunt, of No. 330; Jesse
Grice, of No. 331; William McLaren, of No. 333; Oscar Jocking,
of No. 334; D. R. Barnell, of No. 335; Jacob Goerlitz, of No. 336;
Thos. J. White, of No. 338; A. H. Davidson, of No. 338; George R.
Bryant, of No. 340; E. F. Healy, of No. 341; James H. Waters, of
No. 342; Wilhelm Krensel, of No. 343; Andrew N. Wolf, of No.
344; Lewis Hillis, of No. 345; B. F. Butler, of No. 346; M. M.
Hutto, of No. 347; W. Z. Hillis, of No. 348; Frank P. R. Zimmer-
man, of No. 350; William J. Smith, of No 352; B. C. Selby, of No.
353; W. G. Pray, of No. 354; W. J. Markland, of No. 355; R. H.
Washburn, of No. 356; Nathan Fisher, of No. 357; Samuel Summer-
ville, of No. 358; Chas. Birkhatters, of No 359; Jas. H. Hout, of No.
360; T. M. Wingate, of No. 361; Clinton Rogers, of No. 362; J. L. Mon-
roe, of No. 363; Jacob Butterbaugh, of No. 365; L. M. Brown, of
No. 367; Henry H. Heacox, of No. 368; Winfield W. Mullen, of
369; L. C. Frederick, of No. 370; Orland L. Cline, of No. 373; Jesse
P. Kendall, of No. 374; R. S. Records, of No. 375; Jacob Smith, of
No. 376; Francis H. Wartoff, of No. 376; Will Veach, of No. 377; D M.
Pulver, of 378; A. J. Hopkins, of No. 379; F. P. Engle, of No. 380; Har-
lan Hisley, of No. 381; N. Stein, Jr., of No. 382; Carl Lewis, of No 383;
Thomas Bristow, of No. 384; James P. McWiUiams, of No. 386; J.
W. Burrell, of No. 387; G. F. Jones, of No. 389; R. F. Custer, of No.
390; James A. Horton, of No. 391; F. M. Wall, of No. 392; Charles
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2305
E. Moody, of No. 394; George W. Lewis, of No. 397; F. C. Gray of
No. 399; William Sloppy, of No. 400; B. H. Cook, of No. 401; Solo-
mon Arnsberger, of No. 403; Ellsworth Collins, of No. 404; L. E
Hardy, of No. 405 ; Henry C. Ross, of No. 406; William J. Harris,
of No. 407; William C. Brewer, of No. 408; C. Q. Twibell, of No. 410;
W. H. Boyer, of No. 411; James F. Mattingly, of No. 412; Jesse A.
Holmes, of No. 413; C. D. Muberline, of No. 413; C. W. Stewart, of
No. 415: Thomas Moore, of No. 416; J. A. Anheir, of No 417; H. W.
Royce.of No. 419; Jas. S. Smith, of No. 420; J. R. Davis, of No. 421;
J. W Brock, of No. 425; T. W. Crickle, of No. 426; Arthur McMa-
han, of No. 428; Levi Zernburn, of No. 430; R. S. Armington of
No. 432; David W. Patterson, of No. 433; P. E. Sanders, of No. 434;
George W. Weir, of No. 435; Wes McDaniel, of No. 437; William
Carr, of No. 438; Aaron Stanfield, of No. 439, Thomas Gibson of
No. 440; John R. Karner, of No. 442; D. B. Beanblossom, of No.
443; Stephen Crasier, of No. 444; William H. Good, of No. 445;
Robin Proctor, of No. 447; John E. Parritt, of No. 448; Worth Mew-
hinney, of No. 449; William Rentzel, of No 452; George F. Emma of
No 453; T. P. Conn, of No. 455; P. C. Jolly, of No. 466; James Byers,
of No. 457; J. L. Custer, of No. 458; John B. Morris, of No. 460;
Edgar A. Adams, of No. 461; E. C. Laughlin, of No. 463;
William Kemp, of No. 464; James M. Barkley, of No. 465; J. F.
Lewis, of No. 466; John D. Nash, of No. 467; J. W. Edwards, of No.
468; Wm. E. Wells, of No. 470; J. T. Sutton, of No. 471; G. W.
Myers, of No. 472; G. C. Davidson, of No. 473; James F. Morris, of
No. 475; James B. Holmes, of No. 476, Alonzo Shanks, of No. 477;
Alonzo N. Doty, of No. 478; John F. Ashton, of No. 479; F. F. Ben-
nett, of No. 480; Melvin Ice, of No. 481; Samuel Goodknight, of
No. 482; Wm. Smith, of No. 484; Charles E Davis, of No. 485;
Harley B. Stewart, of No. 486; W. T. Timmons, of No. 487; N. C.
Apgar, of No. 488; W. J. Beeson, of No. 493; J. R. Prather
of No. 494; F. L. Miller, of No. 495; Abraham Collins, of
No. 498; Francis Doughty, of No. 499; J. M. Swarth-
out, of No. 499; George H. Butler, of No. 500;
J. A. Sudderth, of No. 501; R. E. Simmons, of No. 503; Joseph
Court of No. 504; J. B. McCartney, of No. 505; Hiram B. Bridge, of
No. 506; H. Hunt, of No. 507; Jesse Ballard, of No. 508; Addison
W. Lewis, of 509; Luther T. Hale, of No. 510; Joseph Cropper, of
No. 511; Alex. Spinks, of No. 512; W. C. Smith, of No. 513; John
T. Smith, of No. 513; Edgar A. Phipps, of No. 514; Jerry Guinee, of
No. 515; George Emmons, of No. 516; Jesse A. Holloway, of
No. 517; N. E. Austill of No. 521; Jonathan Giflfy of No. 522,
Harvey Wirtz, of No. 523; John K. Wilson, of No 524;
Michael Crow, of No. 525; John A. McMahan, of No. 526;
George Phillipps, of No. 527; C. W. Fisher, of No. 528; Michael
Melbert, of No. 529; Robert Allen, of ;No. 530; Fred Hauser, of No.
531; M. C. Gregory, of No. 532; Jerome H. Scott, of No. 533; Orvin
Klepper, of No. 534; A. E. Smith, of No. 535, T. M. Cottingham, of
No. 536; T. D. W. Manchester, of No. 537; Lafayette Riff, of
No. 539; F. P. Poor, of No. 540; Fred Snyder, of No.
541; Samuel Fettinger, of No 543; 0. C. Larue, of No.
544; W. E. Buckner, of No. 545; John Bennett, of No. 546;
2306 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
Truman Dason, of No. 547 ; Mason Todd, of No. 548 ; Thomas J.
Brown, of No. 549; William Martin, of No. 549; George W. Burton,
of No. 550; Benton C. Howell, of No. 551 ; C. R. Burroughs, of No.
552 : Emmons Low, of No. 553 ; D. B. Fox, of No. 554 ; Amos L.
Ray, of No. 555 ; George T. Townsley, of No. 556 ; D. H. Thiby, of
No. 557 ; James E. Trinkle, of No. 558 ; George W. Lyons, of No.
557; Frank Nottingham, of No. 561 ; Henry L. Arnold, of No. 563;
A. A. Rogers, of No. 564; James E. Twineham, of No. 565; Alonzo
Yates,ofNo. 566; W. A. Bingaman, of No. 567; JohnHigley,of No. 568;
William Yandiver, of No. 569; Henry A. Watts, of No. 570; R. L.
Peltz, of No. 571; T. E. Littell, of No. 572; W. S. Canfield, of No.
573, Wm. F. Bapp, of No. 574; L. W. Myers, of No. 576; E. Wilson,
of No. 577; J. D. Weddell, of No. 578; J. F. Pepper, of No. 579; F.
A. Day, of No. 580; Jas. D. Smith, of No. 581; B. F. Lance, of No. 582;
O. W. Craw, of No. 584; B. F. Hardin, of No. 586; Thos. L. Imes, of
No. 587; J. W. Guiney, of No. 588; Benj. Douglass, of No.
589; M. Baland, of No. 591; L. A. Vranbarger, of No. 592;
J. A. McLeland, of No. 593; B. 0. Burkett, of No. 593;
E. B. Brown, of No. 594; William Denny, of No. 595;
L. W. Teabarger, of No. 595; Andrew Arrick, of No. 598; S. C.
Keel, of No. 600; H. B. Dryer, of No. 601; H. E. Gettil, of No.
602; Charles Barnhart, of No. 603; G. W. Scott, of No. 604; Geo.
H. Leaman, of No. 605; Paul Nast, of No. 606; A. J. Daniels, of
No. 608; H. J. St. Clair, of No. 609; W. S. Chapman, of No. 610;
James M Austin, of No. 611, Frank HoUiday, of No. 612; Charles
Martin, of No. 613; Geo. W. Clark, of No 614; C. T. Mahan, of
No. 615; John Handford, of No. 616; Wilson Brugh, of No.
618; George Gunn, of No. 619; H. C. Rundell, of No.
621; Daniel McClannahan, of No. 622; U. I. Newkirk, of No. 623;
Amos Musselman, of No. 624; Isaac Pennington, of No. 625; Calvin
McCoy, of No. 626; William T. Bennett, of No. 627; W. S. Pigg, of
No. 628; Curtis Mourer, of No. 629; W. H. H. Tucker, of No. 630;
Jacob Bozarth, of No. 631; P. V. Bardin, of No. 632; Robert Pil-
kington, of No. 633; I. N. Veley, of No. 634; William Jarboe, of
No. 635; William F. Norwood, of No. 636; H. D. Hunt, of No. 637;
John A. Tracey, of No. 638; James Parsell, of No.
639; John Reed, of No. 640; William E King, of
No. 641; J. J. Archer, of No. 642; F. C. Pursley, of No.
643; William Graper, of No. 644; Charles W. Akers, of No. 645;
S. A. Singleton, of No. 646; Lewis Fry, of No. 647; F. J. Sanxter, of
No. 648; John F. Zimmerman, of No. 649; E. 0. Deeds, of No. 650;
S. S. Heiny, of No. 651; I. N. Rich, of No. 652; James Boyle, of No. 653;
0. C. Richey, of No. 654; W. C. Aldridge, of No. 655; Ora Check, of
No. 656; Charles Meador, of No. 658; John R. Fisher, of No. 659;
C. C. Wright, of No. 660; James Wallis, of No. 661; Judson Wagstaff, of
No. 693; Charles Appleman, of No. 664; H D. Nicewanger, of No. 665;
John Harris, of No. 666; Nathan A. Lindley, of No. 667; Amos
Junod, of No. 668; Charles E. Wiesehan, of No. 669; Anderson
Percifield, of No. 670; William T. Grattan, of No. 670; C. A. Jen-
kins, of No. 671; A. L. Watkins, of No. 672; T. D. Tour, of No. 673;
David M. Patterson, of No. 674; Josiah Bell, of No. 674; J. M.
Burlingame, of No. 675; Wilhelm Kuhn, of No. 676; Herbert E.
Jones, of No. 677; Andrew Cook, of No. 678; F. J. Bowell, of, No.
679; Melvin Tucker, of No. 680; M. H. Sample, of No. 681; Dean
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2307
Acuff, of No. 682; Edwin Heller, of No. 683; Edward Terhune, of
No. 684; J. F. Drake, of No. 685; Thomas Hudson, of No. 686;
George Ridlen, of No. 687; B. Bollinger, of No. 688;
Mark Knapp, of No. 689; William H. Sapp, of No. 690; J. B. Cot-
trell, of No. 691; Geo. A. Brugh, of No. 692; N. G. Willis, of No.
693; B. W, Murphy, of No. 694; J. T. Sparks, of No. 695; F. M.
Shull, of No. 695; George Paugh, of No. 696; James P. Culver, of
No. 697; Thomas Conley, of No. 698; James C. Shelly, of No. 699;
John W. Hetzer, of No. 700; H. P. Hopkin^ of No. 701; H.
C. Summers, of No. 701; Albert Herbst, of No. 702; P. A. Dailey,
of No. 703; Francis M. Ferrell, of No. 705; 1. N. Shake, of No.
706; J. C. Coulter, of No 707; Thomas L. Patrick, of No. 708.
The Grand Master then announced the Standing Com-
mittees as follows :
COMMITTEE ON STATE OF THE ORDER.
G. Rep. W. H. Talbott of No. 296.
P. G. Rep. Jno. F. Wildman of No. 74.
P. G. Rep. J. E. C. F. Harper of No. 2.
P. G. Rep. W. H. DeWolf of No. 20.
P. G. Rep. C. P. Tuley of No. 166.
P. G. Rep. S. P. Stroup of No. 197.
P. G. Rep. A. C. Daily of No. 472.
P. G. Rep. W. R. Myers of No. 131.
P. G. J. 0. Pedigo of No. 470.
P. G. H. G.' Thayer of No. 94.
P. G. Rep. A. N. Grant of No. 295.
COMMITTEE ON LEGISLATION
P. G. Rep. W. H. Leedy of No. 465.
G. Rep. U. Z. Wiley of No. 460.
P. G. L. J. Monks of No 121.
P. G. 0. H. Bogue of No. 46.
P. G. T. W. Hutchison of No. 215.
P. G. J. F. Mann of No. 167.
P. G. J. W. Henderson of No. 212.
COMMITTEE ON GRIEVANCES AND APPEALS.
G. Rep. John B. Cockrum of No. 144.
P. G. Rep. J. B. Kimball of No. 316.
P. G. George Shirts of No. 125.
P. G. Rep. J. B. Kenner of No. 42.
G. Rep. E. G. Hogate of No. 123.
2308 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
COMMITTEE ON SUBORDINATE LODGE CONSTITUTIONS.
P. G. Rep. J. W. Cooper of No. 133.
P. G. D. C. SearlsofNo. 96.
P. G. R. P. Davis of No. 281.
P. G. Moses Remington of No. 35 >.
P. G. Morgan Manlej' of No. 62.
P. G. C. F. Crecelius of No. 142.
P. G. J. E. Edmonson of No. 166.
COMMITTEE ON FINANCE AND ACCOUNTS.
P. G. Rep. D. B. Shideler of No. 44.
P. G. Ed. Farrer of No. 35.
P. G. U. H. Hon of No. 130.
G. H. P. J. M. Lang of No. 147.
P. G. H. C. ScearceofNo. 211.
COMMITTEE ON UNFINISHED AND MISCELLANEOUS
BUSINESS.
P. G. John Ryan of No. 601.
P. G. Edgar E. Kelsey of No. 42.
P. G. W. R. Nesbit of No. 147.
P. G. George Sinex of No. 1.
P. G. L. J. Patty of No. 401.
COMMITTEE ON MILEAGE AND PER DIEM.
P. G. Rep. Lawrence Gates of No. 180.
P. G. J. S. Byer of No. 59.
P. G. L. G. AikinofNo. 690.
COMMITTEE ON DEGREE OF REBEKAH.
P. G. Rep. C. C. Binkley of No. 41.
P. G. M. H. Chappell of No. 99.
P. G. J. C. Livezey of No. 59.
P. G. F. G. Epply of No. 131.
P. G. W. W. Canada of No. 121.
P. G. George Rogers of No. 15.
P. G. John T. Leach of No. 19.
P. G. A. J. Stakebake of No. 121.
Grand Master Chipman declined to appoint the Com-
mittee on Petitions, and requested that D. D. Grand
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2309
Master C. F. Northern, appoint said committee, which he
made as follows :
COMMITTEE ON PETITIONS AND APPLICATIONS.
P. 0. R. E. Slater of No. 8.
L. E. Cowles of No. "iSS.
P. G. Will Haas of No. 103.
P. G. C. B. Steward of No. 143.
P. G. J. W. Tingle of No. 254.
PEOOF-READER.
P. G. J. H. Banning of No. 29.
Which appointments were approved by the Grand
Lodge.
U. Z. Wiley, Grand Rep., submitted the following res-
olutions :
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. F., of Indiana:
It is with deep and profound regret that this Grand Lodge has
learned of the sad bereavement of P. G. M. and G. Rep. elect to
Sovereign Grand Lodge, Bro. Will H. Talbott, in the recent death
of his daughter, and also of the present dangerous illness of his
beloved wife, which latter cause prevents his attendance at this
session. Therefore, be it
Resolved, That we, as the Representatives to, and members of this
Grand Lodge, extend to Bro. Talbott, our sincere and fraternal
sympathy, in the sorrows through which he has passed, in the
death of his daughter, and in his present deep anxiety and trial
through which he is passing, occasioned by the illness of his wife,
and that we all, with one heart and mind, hope and pray for her
speedy restoration to health.
Resolved, further. That the Grand Secretary be requested to trans-
mit forthwith to Bro. Talbott, a copy of these resolutions under the
seal of the Grand Lodge.
Which, on motion, was adopted unanimously by a
standing vote.
The Grand Officers' semi-annual reports were then sub-
mitted, as follows :
GRAND MASTER'S REPORT.
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. 0. F., of Indiana:
My Brothers — In the discharge of the high duties you are
called upon to perform, as representatives from all the Lodges in
this Grand Jurisdiction, you will find cause for congratulation, that
notwithstanding the widespread financial difficulties that surround
2310 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
our people, the stagnation in business and the cessation of progress
in business enterprises, the Lodges of our Order have met every
obligation, have prospered financially, and have generously pro-
vided for the relief of our vporthy brothers and all others entitled
to our care ; that we have more than held our own in point of
-numbers, and that the quality of membership, so long a matter of
just pride, has been maintained.
During the past six months, four new Subordinate Lodges have
been instituted and one has been resuscitated, and nineteen new
Rebekah Lodges have been instituted. The new Subordinate
Lodges instituted are as follows :
Liberty Lodge, No. 710, was instituted at Kempton, Tipton
county, February 20, 1895, by John Reynolds, Special Deputy.
Frankton Lodge, No. 711, was instituted at Frankton, Madison
county, March 6, 1895, by the Grand Master.
Martinsburg Lodge, No. 712, was instituted at Martinsburg,
Washington county, March 8, 1895, by B. W. Martin, Special Deputy.
Twelve Mile Lodge, No. 713, was instituted at Twelve Mile, Cass
county, 1895, by John E. Barnes, D. D. G. M.
LODGE RESUSCITATED.
Alamo Lodge, No. 230, was resuscitated at Alamo, Montgomery
county, December 15, 1894, by J. A.^overbeck, Special Deputy.
REBEKAH LODGES INSTITUTED.
Charters have been issued and the following Rebekah Lodges
have been instituted :
Stella Lodge, No. 468, was instituted at Lincolnville, Wabash
county, December 14, 1894, by Oliver H. Bogue, D. D. G. M.
Saratoga Lodge, No. 469, was instituted at Saratoga, Randolph
county, December 7, 1894, by W. W. Canada, D. D. G. M.
Sadie Lodge, No. 470, was instituted at Homer, Rush county,
November 28, 1894, by Edwin Farrer, D. D. G. M.
Star Lodge, No. 465, was instituted at Walkerton, St. Joseph
county, December 6, 1894, by Anna I. Henderson, Special Deputy.
Lone Star Lodge, No. 471, was instituted at Newtown, Fountain
county, December 18, 1894, by W. H. Webster, D. D. G. M.
Wilkinson Lodge, No. 472, was instituted at Wilkinson, Hancock
county, January 9, 1895, by S. P. Gordon, D. D. G. M.
Liberty Lodge, No. 473, was instituted at Stockwell, Tippecanoe
county, February 14, 1895, by Frank F. Carroll, D. D. G. M.
Martha Lodge, No. 474, was instituted at Bird's-Eye, Dubois
county, February 23, 1895, hj Benj. W. Smith, Special Deputy.
Samantha Lodge, No. 475, was instituted at Michigantown, Clin-
ton county, January 31, 1895, by Elias Morkert, D. D. G. M.
Charity Lodge, No. 476, was instituted at Denver, Miami county,
February 21, 1895, by M. Bappert, Special Deputy.
Arlington Lodge, No. 477, was instituted at Arlington, Rush
county, February 19, 1895, by Edwin Farrer, Special Deputy.
Welcome Lodge, No. 478, was instituted at Lawrence, Marion
county, March 4, 1895, by Edward .Springer, Special Deputy.
Naomi Lodge, No. 479, was instituted at Rees's Mills, Boone
county, March 14, 1895, by J. 0. Pedigo, D. D. G. M.
Oak Leaf Lodge, No. 489, was instituted at Attica, Fountain
county, March 30, 1895, by Belle Grimes, Special Deputy.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2311
Economy Lodge, No. 481, was instituted at Economy, Wayne
county, April 18, J895, by Francis W. Geeka.
Van Buren Lodge, No. 482, was instituted at Van Buren, Grant
county, April 25, 1895, by E. L. Coxe, D. D. G. M.
Eden Lodge, No. 483, was instituted at Eden, Hancock county,
May 1, 1895, by S. P. Gordon, D. D. G. M.
Evergreen Lodge, No. 484, was instituted at Leesburg, Kosciusko
county, April 26, 1895, by Geo. B. Ogden, D. D. G. M.
Anna Lodge, No. 485, was instituted at Patricksburg, Owen
county. May 3, 1895, by Chas. E. Crippen, Special Deputy.
ODD fellows' home.
At the November session, 1891, of this Grand Body, the Grand
Master and Grand Secretary were ordered to draw a warrant for
one-twelfth of the amount derived from dues from Subordinate
Lodges each six months, payable to the Treasurer of the Odd Fel-
lows' Home.
At the November session, 1894, the Committee on Finance and
Accounts recommended that this resolution be rescinded, and that
the Secretary be directed to calculate the amount due the Odd Fel-
lows' Home, and that an account be opened with said Odd Fellows'
Home, giving it credit for the amount then due under that resolu-
tion, to be paid when the location is definitely settled and the build-
ing is under construction. This was referred to a special committee,
(see p. 2168 Nov. session, 1894), which reported that the Ti'ustees of
the Home had agreed to waive any claim under the resolution re-
ferred to until such time in the future as the necessities thereof may
require, and until further notice of the Grand Lodge, and that no
further sum of money be set aside under the resolution until that
time, which resolution was concurred in by this Grand Body. (See
proceedings Nov. session, 1894, p. 2209-2210.)
The amounts appropriated by the resolution of the November
session, 1891, were never, in fact, drawn from the treasury, but were
lost with the other Lodge funds in the Indianapolis National Bank.
There is now unpaid to the Home under this resolution from this
Grand Body $4,200, and the Trustees of the Home now have five
acres of ground near Crown Hill Cemetery, north of this city, upon
which to build the Home, and state that if* this Grand Lodge will
pay the above sum, the Home can be built and put in operation this
year. 1 submit the correspondence from Bro. J. B Kenner, Presi-
dent of the Home, for your consideration, believing that your gen-
erous impulses will provide for this noble enterprise all that a pru-
dent regard for the interests of the Order in the present condition
of our Grand Lodge treasury will permit.
ORPHANS HOME.
In January, 1893, a number of Odd Fellows and Daughters of
Rebekah at South Bend established a home for the orphans of
Indiana Odd Fellows, and in August, 1893, it was incorporated
under the laws of the State. Thus far a noble work has been
done. There are now seven Odd Fellows' orphans receiving the
2312 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
loving care and tender attention of faithful Daughters of Rebekah
in that institution.
An effort was made to secure subscriptions from the Subordinate
and Rebekah Lodges of the State to insure the permanent success
of this most worthy enterprise. So far lour Subordinate and
Rebekah Lodges have responded and the subscriptions thus made
have only guaranteed the payment of 1317 per annum for the
support of these wards of ours.
In April I received a communication from Mrs. Henderson, the
secretary of the association, that has so generously given time and
money to make this home a success, stating that they must give it
up while they could honestly settle all its obligations and that on
25th of April they would wind up its affairs. Believing that|the
43,000 Odd Fellows of this good old State, who pledged themselves
at our altars to provide for the orphans of those who in life bore
their share in the great work of Odd Fellowship, would not permit
these fatherless babes to want for proper care, I requested those
in charge of this benevolent institution to postpone its abandon-
ment until this Grand Body should have an opportunity to express
itself, and this was done. I lay the interests of these little ones on
your hearts and commit their future to your fraternal care. The
correspondence, the articles of incorporation and by-laws, and all
other information in my possession will be submitted to the proper
committee.
REBEKAH ASSEMBLY.
Pursuant to the order of this Grand Body at its last annual
communication, your Grand Master and Grand Secretary prepared
a charter for a Rebekah Assembly for Indiana, and it was presented
and a Rebekah Assembly organized in this hall on the 21st of May,
1895, and it begins its career under the most flattering conditions.
DISTRICT MEETINGS.
Four district meetings were authorized for the current year.
One of these was held at Rushville, on the 8th day of May, which
was a decided success in every respect. A very large number of
Lodges were represetited. The whole city welcomed the visitors
and treated them with generous hospitality. A grand street parade
was a feature that excited great interest within, as well as without
the Order. The degree work, both in the Rebekah and subordi-
nate branches was of a high order, and the meeting will, no doubt,
be of great value in that section of the State.
DECISIONS.
In response to questions from Lodges and members, a great
many decisions have been made — too many to embody them in this
report. One of them involves a question that should be settled by
this Grand body.
Is a Past Grand of an old Lodge, who has never served as
Vice Grand, eligible as Representative in this body ?
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2313
Under Section 3, Article I, of the Constitution of this Grand
Lodge it is expressly provided that he is not, while in Section 1,
Chapter XIX, General Laws, the only qualification required is
that he shall be a Past Grand.
At the May session, 1887, page 1182, the question was presented
to the Legislative Committee of this body as to whether a Noble
Grand who had not filled the office of Vice Grand would be eligible
as Representative. The committee, citing Section 5, Chapter 3 of
the General Laws, held that he would be, but the section of the
Constitution above cited was not referred to in the decision, and
believing the provision of the Constitution and the section of the
General Laws are in conflict that the Constitution would control,
I held the Noble Grand under such circumstances would not be
eligible as Representative, and submit it to you for your approval
or disapproval.
The large financial and fraternal interests submitted for your ac-
tion at this session of this Grand Body will demand careful consid-
eration. The rights of members and of Lodges will be adjudicated
by you. Let us approach the discharge of these important duties
with a determination that justice and mercy shall both obtain, and
that our great Order shall reap some benefit from this meeting.
M. A. CHIPMAN,
Grand Master.
On motion of W. H. Leedy, P. G. Master, the following
resolution was adopted :
Resolved, That that part of the Grand Master's report, Lodges
instituted and resuscitated, be referred to the Committee on Peti-
tions and Applications; that part refei'iing to the institution of Re-
bekah Lodges and Rebekah Assembly, to Committee on Degree of
Rebekah ; that part I'eferring to Odd Fellows' Home, Orphans'
Home and District Meetings, to Committee on State of the Order;
that part referring to decisions of the Grand Master to the Legisla-
tive Committee.
GRAND SECRETARY'S REPORT.
To the Grand Lodge I. O. 0. F. of Indiana :
I herewith submit my report for the term ending December 31,
1894. From the statistics presented it will be seen that we have a
slight gain in membership, which is very gi'atifying when we con-
sider the financial crisis through which we have passed. For the
year ending the same period, our net gain over all losses by suspen-
sion and otherwise is seven hundred and seven !
Our relief report for the term may be summed up as follows :
Two thousand three hundred and fourteen brothers, and one hundred and
eighty-six widowed families have been relieved. The sum of $51,-
002.15 has been paid for the relief of brothers; $2,410.78 for the
relief of widowed families ; $254.99 for educating orphans; $13,960.40
for burying the dead, and $5,239.71 for other charitable purpose,s
2314
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
making the total amount of relief for the term $72,868.('3. If this
be added to the relief reported at the November session, 1894, we
have the large sum of $155,628.42 as the relief for the year ending
December 31, 1894.
Four new Subordinate Lodges and nineteen Rebekah Lodges have
been instituted since the last session of the Grand Lodge. For a
record of these you are referred to the report of the Grand Master.
The subjoined statement will show the work and condition of
the Subordinate Lodges for the term ending December 31, 1894:
Lodges per last report .... 610
Instituted since 4
Suspended 1
Lodges now effective 618
Number of members per last report 41,867
Additions by initiation 1,114
Admitted by card 186
Reinstated 147
Accessions 1,447 '
Total 43,314
Withdrawn by card 209
Suspended for cause 23
Suspended for non-payment of dues 967
Expelled 24 '
Deaths 203
Total abatements 1,426
Now in active membership 41,888
Rej ections J;0
Past Grands 14,887
Resources of Lodges $2,284,923 66
Receipts of Lodges 202,018 78
Expenses of Lodges 89 678 19
Dues to Grand Lodge 5,835 95
Brothers relieved 2,314
Widowed families relieved 186
Number of weeks sickness for which
benefits have been paid 13,848
Paid for relief of brothers 51,002 15
Paid for the relief of widowed familien^.. 2,410 78
Paid for educating orphans 254 99
Paid for burying the dead 13,960 40
Paid for other charitable purposes 5,239 71
Total for relief and charity $72,868 03
Total expense, including relief $162,546 22
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2315
The annexed statement will show the source of revenue, from
whence obtained, together with the amount and nature of dis-
bursements, and condition of the treasury May 1, 1895, date of
closing the books :
Charters
Books
Cards
General Laws
Charts, Forms and Odes
Dues
Balances
Veteran Jewels
Fines '.
Postage
Haughey's securities
Total amount of receipts $10,109 82
The following is the condition of the treasury :
Balance on hand per last report 100 29
Paid to Grand Treasurer as above 10,109 82
$265 00
642 85
451 95
344 96
113 50
5,849 57
70 74
48 00
20 00
2,295 48
Total $10,210 11
Cash borrowed by Grand Treasurer 4,000 00
Cash dividend Grand Lodge stock, to Jan. 1, 1895 4,920 00
Cash transfer. Grand Lodge Hall account 2,000 00
. Total $21,130 11
ORDERS PAID.
Mileage and per diem Grand Officers and Representa-
tives
OfiBcers' Salaries
Mileage and per diem Committee on Grievances and
Appeals
Mileage and per diem Committee on Mileage and Per
Diem
Mileage and per diem Committee oh Finance
Mileage and per diem Committee on Credentials
Expenses of District Deputy Grand Master's
W. B. Burford, printing and stationery
Assistance
Committee on Printing :
Sovereign Grand Lodge Supplies
Sovereign Grand Lodge Representative Tax
Paid loan and interest
Transfer Grand Lodge Hall
Grand Master's expense
District Meeting
Special Deputies
15,102 95
950 00
80
35
39 30
30
45
48 80
47
72
850
26
450
00
47
90
1,116
25
150 00
4,081
33
5,295
00
150 00
50
00
18
75
2316 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
Office Expense 234 72
Miscellaneous 163 69
Total $18,916 47
Balance in the Treasury 12,213 64
The following is my report on Rebekah Lodges :
It is with pleasure that we note the continued prosperity of the
Rebekah branch of the Order. Some nineteen Rebekah Lodges
have been instituted since the last session of the Grand Lodge.
For a record of these you are referred to the report of the Grand
Master. The following is the summary of the statistics gathered
from the reports received from three hundred and thirty-two Rebekah
Lodges for the year ending December 31, 1894;
Number of members per last report — brothers. 8,317
Number of members per last report — sisters... 10,817
Total )y,134
Admitted during the year— brothers 1,907
Admitted durin g the year — sisters 2,408
Accessions 4,315
Total 23,449
Withdrawn or dropped— brothers 1,204
Withdrawn or dropped — sister.* 1,020
Expelled — brothers 5
Expelled — sisters. . . , 2
Deceased — brothers 58
Deceased — sisters 99
Abatements 2,388
Members December 31, 1894 21,061
Assets December 31, 1893 $16,897 02
Receipts for the year ending December 31, 1894 18,805 46
Total $35,702 48
Amount paid for the relief of members $1,602 19
Amount paid for the relief of widowed families 587 10
Expenses during the year ending December
31, 1894 14,340 43
Total expenses, including relief $16,529 72
Total assets December 31,'l894 $19,172 76
The per capita tax received from three hundred and thirty-two Re-
bekah Lodges, as per record on file in the office, amounts to $681.32.
Bills paid for printing and postage, $16.75. Balance, $664.57, has
been paid to Mrs. Mary A. Poths, Secretary of the Rebekah Con-
vention. A record of all these Lodges, with the name, number
and location of each, and the amount paid by each, has also been
furnished to the Convention.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2317
CONCLUSION.
In reviewing the work of the term, it will be seen that there has
been no loss, but a slight gain. Since the beginning of the year
there has been a great activity among the Lodges, and from present
indications we anticipate a large gain for the term ending in June,
1895. With returning prosperity in the various branches of Indus
try, Odd Fellowship will continue its onward march in the fore-
front of the fraternal institutions of the land. Invoking the con-
tinued smiles of a kind and indulgent Providence, let us go forward
in our work of mutual relief and love, and a rich and golden
harvest will be the fruitage of our labors.
Fraternally submitted,
B. F. Foster,
Grand Secretary.
Which, on motion, was referred to the Committee on
Finance and Accounts.
GRAND TREASURER'S REPORT.
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. 0. F., of Indiana :
Herewith is submitted the report of your Grand Treasurer for
the term ending May 1, 1895:
fiENERAL FUND.
Dr.
Balance on hand per last report $100 29
Borrowed, per instructions Grand Lodge 4,000 00
Transferred from Grand Lodge Hall account 2,000 00
Received from B. F. Foster, Grand Secretary 10,109 82
Received dividend G. L. Hall stock July 1, 1893, to
Jan. 1, 1895 4,920 00
Total '. $21,130 11
Cr.
Am't paid for mileage and per diem $5,102 95
Am't paid for officers' salaries 950 00
Am't paid Committee G. and A 80 35
Am't paid Committee M. and P. D 39 30
Am't paid Committee on Credentials 48 80
Am't paid Committee on Finances 39 45
Am't paid for assistance 450 Oi)
Am't paid expense of D. D. G. Masters ... 47 72
Am't paid expense Committee on Print'g 47 90
Am't paid expense Special Deputies 18 75
Am't paid Wm. B. Burford for printing .. 850 26
2318 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
Am't Sovereign Grand Lodge supplies $1,266 25
Am't paid on loan and interest 4,081 33
Am't paid Grand Lodge hall fund 5,295 00
Am't paid Grand Master's expense 150 00
Am't paid for District Meeting 50 00
Am't paid for Miscellaneous 163 69
Am't paid for Office Expense 234 72
Balance 2.213 64
Total $21,130 11
GRAND LODGE HALL FUND.
Dr.
Balance on hand last report $1,733 84
Amount received from rents 5,607 52
Amount received from Grand Lodge, return of loan... 5,295 00
Amount received from T. P. Haughey securities 827 95
Total $13,464 31
CV.
Amount paid for janitor and furnace man
Amount paid for light and heat
Amount paid for water rent
Amount paid for insurance
Amount paid for taxes
Amount paid for night watchman
Transfer to Grand Lodge Fund
Amount paid for salaries
Amount paid A. B. Meyer & Co., coal
Amount paid for repairs
Dividends
Balance
Total
For a detailed statement of receipts and expenses, herewith find
submitted books and vouchers.
Fraternally submitted,
James A. Wildman,
Grand Treasurer.
Which, on motion, was referred to the Committee on
Finance and Accounts.
1 $431 25
303 53
47 50
325 00
1,009 93
26 00
2,000 00
50 00
37 03
235 75
6,952 50
2,045 82
$13,464 31
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2319
GRAND LODGE TRUSTEES' REPORT.
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. F., of Indiana :
The Trustees of the Grand Lodge Hall respectfully submit the
following statement of receipts and disbursements since their last
report :
Balance on hand November 1, 1894 $1,733 84
Amount received for rents —
Edward Schurmann, to Nov. 1, 1895 $300 00
Henry J. Huder, May 1, 1895 1,800 00
Merchant Police 60 00
J. W. Staub, May 1, 1895 600 00
W. W. Gates, May 1, 1895 100 02
John Reynolds, May 1, 1895 100 02
A. Blitz, May 1, 1895 100 02
A. Metzger, May 1, 1895... 210 00
G. W. Hofiman, May 1, 1895 75 00
H. H. Lee, May 1, 1895 999 96
Medearis Bros., May 1, 1895 450 00
0. F. Mutual Aid Association, May 1, 1895.. ■ 124 9S
Lodges 18, 44, 124 and 129, April 18, 1895.... 600 00
Encampments Nos. 5 and 57, April 1, 1895.. 87 52
Am't rec'd from T. P. Haughey securities... 827 95
G. L. Fund, return of loan 5,295 00
$11,730 47
$13,464 31
DISBURSEMENTS.
Amount paid for —
Janitor and furnaceman $431 25
Light and heat 303 53
Water rent 47 50
Insurance 325 00
Taxes 1,0C9 93
Night watchman 26 00
Transfer to G. L. Fund 2,000 00
Salaries 50 00
A. B. Meyer & Co., coal 37 03
Repairs 235 75
Dividends 6,952 50
Balance 2,045 82
$13,464 31
2320 PROCEEDINGS OP' THE
DIVIDENDS.
All dividends due from July 1, 1893, to January 1, 1895, on
Grand Lodge Hall stock have been paid, with the exception of
warrant No. 1,226, calling for $18.75. The warrant has not, as yet,
been presented for payment.
Respectfully and fraternally submitted,
Jno. a. Furgason,
John F. Wallick,
Geo. Shirts,
J AS. A. WiLDMAN, ex officio,
B. F. Foster, ex officio,
Trustees.
Which, on motion, was referred to the Committee on
Finance and Accounts.
W. H. Leedy, P. G. Rep., from the Committee on Leg-
islation, submitted the following
REPORT:
To the Gran,/ Lody,', I. O. O. F., of Indiana :
Your Committee on Legislation, at the November session, 1894,
(pages 2182-2183), were instructed to amend Section 13, Chapter
IV, of the General Laws by adding the following:
" It shall be the duty of each Subordinate Lodge to enact such
by-law for the enforcement of the provisions of this section as it
may deem most efficient, and such by-law shall be the only law for
the enforcement thereof.
"Should any member be dissatisfied with the enforcement of
said by law in any case, he may appeal to a Committee of Past
Grands in the same manner as provided for in Section 15 of this
Chapter."
By an inadvertance your committee overlooked your instruc-
tion, but take this, the first opportunity possible, to comply there-
with. Therefore, in compliance with and respect for your instruc-
tions, we recommend the adoption of the said amendment.
Which was concurred in.
J. B. Cockrura, G. Rep., submitted the following resolu-
tion :
To the Grand Lodge, J. 0. O. F., of Indiana :
Resolved, That this Grand Lodge tender to the Grand Lodge
Knights of Pythias of Indiana the use of this Grand Lodge Hall
for its annual convocation in June, 1895, and that we extend to it
our best wishes and fraternal greeting.
Which on motion, was concurred in.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2321
J. B. Keuner, from the Standing Comniittee on Print-
ing submitted the following
REPORT:
To the ara,ul l.uUj,; I. ( >. <). F., of Indiana :
Your Committee on Printing, in obedience to law, hereby report
the proceedings of the committee since the last annual session of
the Grand Lodge,
The contract for printing entered into by the committee on
December 14, 1893, for one year having expired, your committee
prior to the said 14th of December, 1894, advertised in two of
the leading newspapers of Indianapolis, that on December 19, 1894,
they would receive bids for the printing of the Grand Lodge, and
all stationery and supplies, and on said 19th of December, we met
and opened the bids, and finding the bid of the Baker-Randolph
Co., was the lowest and best bid. we contracted with them for one
year from December 19, 1894, to December 19, 1895, in writing, and
have their contract now in our possession. We believe we have a
very favorable contract for the Grand Lodge.
We have examined the material that has entered into the sup-
plies, stationery and printing, and find it fully up to contract and
of good serviceable quality.
Your committee are gratified to state that the bills allowed for
printing, stationery and supplies furnished since our last November
session is very light, amounting to only $522.19. This is very light
for that period ; but we can not estimate on these matters saiely
except we take a year, and possibly several years, as the work laps
over; but we are firmly of the opinion that by our new system we
shall be able to save money, and relieve our Grand Officers of a
burden that never ought to belong to them. Indeed we now know
that we have by the contract system saved money.
Which, on motion, was ordered printed.
The following telegram was received, which was ordered
printed in the proceedings, and the Grand Master and
Grand Secretary were instructed to send a suitable response
of fraternal greetings : *
Canton, Ohio, May 21, 1895.
B. F. Foster, Grand Secretary, I. O. O. F.:
The Grand Lodge of Ohio sends fraternal salutations to the
Grand Lodge of Indiana.
Jno. M. Broderick, Grand Master.
C. H. Lyman, Grand Secretary.
2322 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
H. C. Scearce, P. G., from the Committee on Finauce
and Accounts, submitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. O. /■'., of Indiana:
Your Committee on Finance and Accounts have carefully ex-
amined the books, vouchers and report of the Gi'and Treasurer,
also the books and report of the Grand Secretary, and find the
same in all things correct.
Which was concurred in.
H. C. Scearce, P. G., from the same committee, sub-
mitted the following
REPORT:
To (he Grand Lodge, T. 0. O. F., of Indiana :
We, your committee on Finance and Accounts, to whom was re-
ferred the books and vouchers of the Grand Lodge Hall Trustees,
would respectfully repoi-t that we have examined the same and find
them correct.
Which was concurred in.
The Committee on Grievances and Appeals submitted
their report as follows :
We, your Committee of Grievances and Appeals, hereby submit
our report. We have carefully considered all questions submitted
to us and have rendered our opinions thereon as we consider just
and proper. All of which is respectfully submitted.
No. 935. OPINION BY ENOCH G. HOGATE, G. REP.
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. O. F., of Lidianq :
J. T. Burton vs. Herndon Lodge, No. 95.
The charges in this case are as follows :
" We charge Bro. J. T. Burton with committing a fraud upon
Herndon Lodge by representing himself in good health when re-
instated July 8, 1890.
"Specification 1. That he admitted to the examining committee
that his sickness and disability commenced in May, 1890, some two
months prior to his being re-instated.
"Charge 2. We charge Bro. J. T. Burton with obtaining money
fraudulently.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2323
"Specification 1. By claiming and receiving benefits he knew he
was not entitled to.
"Specification 2. Knowing he was not entitled to benefits he
tried through his friends to induce the examining physicians to
make a favorable report on his case so he could continue his draft
on Lodge."
After motions to dismiss and to make the charges more certain
and specific, the appellant was put upon trial on the charges as
above set out. The committee reported the charges sustained by
a minority report, and a majority report was made not sustaining
the charges. The Lodge adopted the minority report and expelled
Bro. J. T. Burton from the Order.
The appellant assigns as one ground of appeal that the charges
and specifications are not sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The charge is fraud. Fraud consists in representing a thing to
be true when the person making the representation knows at the
time it is not true and the person to whom the representation is
made does not know the truth about it, but relies upon the repre-
sentation and acts to his damage.
So far as the first charge is concerned there is no allegation of a
fact in it. It does not disclose what Bro. Burton said in regard to
his health, nor to whom he said it. It does not charge that Bro.
Burton knew to the contrary in regard to his health, nor does it
say that the Lodge was ignorant of his condition of health and
relied on the statement of the appellant, whatever they may have
been. Mere epithets of fraud, without the facts constituting the
fraud, can not make a good ground of complaint. It is not necessary
to even use the word "fraud" if the tacts alleged show it. The
specification under this charge says "he admitted to the examining
committee that his sickness and disability commenced in May,
1890, some two months prior to his being re-instated." This specifi-
cation might serve as evidence of a properly laid charge of fraud,
but as an allegation of a fact it is worthless. If it is anything, it is
pleading the evidence. Again, if the committee mentioned in the
specification was the committee appointed by the Lodge to examine
the fitness of applicant for re-instatement, then he informed the
committee that his disability commenced in May, some two months
before he was re-instated, and consequently the Lodge had knowl-
edge of his state of health and was not misled by the statement of
Bro. Burton, whatever it might have been.
We do not think Lodges should be held to as high a degree of
nicety in pleading as is obseri^ed in our law courts, but when a per-
son is to be put on trial for fraud, involving his membership in the
Order, the charges ought to have a reasonable degree of certainty.
The defendant ought to be quite fully apprised of what he must
meet. It has been so often held that mere epithets in a pleading
will not answer the demands, but what was said or done that was
false and whether the other party acted upon it, must be alleged.
Chapter Xf, Section 2, General Laws, contains these words : " In
all cases of fraud, conduct unbecoming an Odd Fellow, or other
particular oflfense, it shall not be sufficient to state the same in
general terms, but the particulars thereof shall be stated with
reasonable certainty."
2324 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
This section of the law has been followed with many adjixdged
cases by this Grand Body :
Graham vs. Sugar Creek Lodge, May, 1888. page 1320.
Williams vs. Big Creek Lodge, November, 188^, page 73.
Snethan vs. Anoka Lodge, May, 1889, page 229.
Hutchison vs. Tell City Lodge, November, 1894, page 2175.
Wurtzbaugh vs. Columbia Lodge, November, 18S?., page 1878.
Starr vs. Everton Lodge, May, 1893, page 1650.
Barr vs. Philoxenian Lodge, November, 1891, page 1091.
The first charge does not come up to tne requirements of the
General Law, nor the decisions ot this Body in such cases.
The second charge and specifications under the same are bad for
the same reasons. They attempt to present a separate and distinct
cause of action. They do not do so. Nothing is shown by the
charge why he was not entitled to the benefits he received. We
can not look to the first charge, and say the money he got grew out
of his fraudulent re-instatement. Each charge must stand by itself
and be complete in itself
Knowles vs. Terre Haute Lodge, November, 1892, page 1476.
The second specification does not say what he did to induce his
friends to act; does not say that bis iriends acted ; does not say
that the Lodge was damaged by anything the appellant or his
friends said to the examining committee ot physicians.
There are many other questions arising in the record in this case,
such as the substitution of the minority for the majority report,
that the evidence does not sustain the finding of the committee,
etc., but having arrived at the conclusion that the charges are in-
sufficient, we do not examine the other questions.
We therefore offer the following;
Resolved, That the action of Herndon Lodge, No. 95, be reversed
and set aside ; that Bro. J. T. Burton be restored to membership,
and the Lodge given leave to prefer new charges if it so desire.
Enoch G. Hogate,
J. B. Kenner,
Geo. Shirts,
L B. Kimball,
John B. Cockrum.
No. 936. opinion by geo. shirts, a. rep.
To the Grand Lodge, 1. O. O. F., of Indiana:
Your Committee on Grievances and Appeals, to whom was re-
ferred the case of William Kiser vs. Wayne Lodge, No. 17, submit
the following report therein :
This was a trial upon charges, and the penalty inflicted was ex-
pulsion.
The charge was in four different counts, and upon the first one
the Trial Committee found the accused not guilty. This count,
therefore, need not be further noticed.
The secpnd, third and fourth counts were for adultery, associa-
ting with lewd women, and by his conduct bringing reproach upon
the Order.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2325
A motion was made by the accused to dismiss the second, third
and fourth charges, upon the ground of the alleged insufficiency
thereof, which motion was overruled.
It is now argued before this committee that this motion should
have been sustained. But your committee are of the opinion that
no question as to the sufficiency of these charges is pre.'^ented by
this appeal, for the reason that this motion is not contained in the
statement of appeal.
Sec. 15, Chap. XI, General Laws, provides : " The appeal shall be
taken by such person filing a statement of appeal in writing with
the Secretary of the Subordinate Lodge, which shall state, in plain
and concise language, the reasons for taking the appeal, which
statement shall be read- in open Lodge."
It is further provided that thereupon the Secretary, under the
direction of the Lodge, shall prepare an answer to such statement
of appeal, which answer shall likewise state why the appeal should
not be sustained.
It is also provided, in the same section, that the Grand Lodge
shall not have jurisdiction of any matter that has not first been
presented to and acted upon by the Subordinate Lodge interested.
It clearly appears, therefore, from these provisions, that before
any alleged error in such proceedings.can be reviewed here, it must
first be presented to the Subordinate Lodge; and, in case of the
motion here sought to be reviewed, must be embraced in the state-
ment of appeal and read to the Lodge below.
It must follow from this, that we can consider nothing on appeal,
except the matters complained of and stated in the statement of
appeal, and all others must be deemed waived and abandoned.
We decide, therefore, that in this case, no question arises which,
under our laws can be considered by us, touching the insufficiency
of the charges.
May, 1886, 210; May, 1889, 228.
A motion was also made to dismiss the cause for the alleged rea-
son that accused had once been put in jeopardy for the same alleged
offense. But how, or in what manner, he had been put in jeopardy
is not stated ; the motion was not supported by affidavit, nor was
any proof offered to support the same. If such fact existed, it was
the duty of the accused to bring forward his proof of the same,
and, failing to do so, the motion was correctly overruled.
In this connection, it is also argued that the committee erred in
excluding certain testimony. But the record does not show that
any testimony was excluded, nor offered, in which case we have
many times held that we can be guided only by the record.
Our laws wisely provide that all such matters shall be reduced to
writing, and incorporated in the record, which record, when prop-
erly certified to us, must be deemed to speak the exact truth. It
would be dangerous in the extreme to allow a recoi'd of a trial to be
explained, contradicted, added to or varied by oral statements made
when the appeal is being heard by the Grand Lodge.
The remaining errors assigned challenge the sufficiency of the
evidence, and assert that the judgment was contrary to law.
No reason is shown why it is contrary to law, and we have not
2326 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
been able to discover any. The evidence in the record fully sup-
ports the charges, and amply justified the finding of the Trial
Committee.
It has been urged before us that the witnesses who testified- for
the Lodge were not of good character. It was the duty of the ac-
cused to show that in some proper way, at the'trial, if he could.
But the Trial Committee had these witnesses before them, and were
the best, if not the sole, judges of their credibility. And, by the
finding, the committee having believed such witnesses, we can not,
on appeal, disturb the judgment on mere oral statements, made
here for the first time, touching their character.
We therefore offer the following :
Resolved, That this appeal be dismissed.
Geo. Shirts,
J. B. Kimball,
J. B. Kenner,
Enoch G. Hogate,
John B. Cockrum.
No. 937. OPINION BY J. B. COCKRUM, G. REP.
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. F., of Indiana :
Joel Males vs. Morgan Lodge, No. 211, I. 0. 0. F.
Your Committee on Grievances and Appeals, to whom is referred
the appeal of Bro. Joel Males against Morgan Lodge, No. 211,
I. 0. 0. F., submit the following report :
In this case charges were preferred on January 16, 1895, against
Bro Males, as follows ;
1. To having obtained money under false pretenses between the
date of September 24, 1894, and November 25, 1894; having charged
Bro. A. W. Farmer with five and three-fourths days' work more
than he actually did, at the rate of two dollars per day.
2. To lying*^ in that after acknowledging to the foregoing charge
before the Investigating Committee on December 28. 1894, and
promising to pay this money fraudulently obtained to Bro. Farmer
in ten days or two weeks— the time being fixed by Bro. Males him-
self, he has failed to fulfill this promise.
3. To violating the obligation taken during his initiation.
Notice was regularly served of these charges, and the same came
to trial before a regularly appointed Trial Committee, pursuant to
the requirements of the General Laws. Said committee met at
the lodge room on the 6lh day of February, 1895, and Bro. Males
and all witnesses were present. The evidence was heard, and the
Trial Committee made its finding, and on the 13th day of February,
1895, at the lodge room, the Noble Grand opened the package con-
taining the papers and proceedings in the case, and thereupon the
report of the Trial Committee was read, showing that they had in-
vestigated the charges, and, after due notice, had heard the case
and found the first charge of obtaining money under false pretenses
sustained, and the second charge of lying sustained.
GRAND LODGE OK INDIANA. 2327
The evidence is in the record, and goes to show that Bro. Males
had been at work for Bro. Farmer for thirty-six and one half days,
by the account kept by Bro. Farmer, and that Bro. Males had
charged Bro. Farmer with forty-two and one-fourth days' work. In
the evidence, it appears that when a settlement was had between
them, Bro. Farmer had charged against the account of Bro. Males
$43.00 ; whereas, Bro. Males had credited Bro. Farmer with $55.00,
and in the settlement, Bro. Farmer took the book of Bro. Males,
both as to the charge for time and the credit for the money paid.
When the Investigating Committee was looking into the charges
as first presented, they undertook to fix up a compromise, by which
Bro. Males was to pay back to Bro. Farmer, within ten days or two
weeks, a certain amount of money, and as he did not do it, they
then preferred the charges that he had falsely and fradulently ob-
tained the money from Bro. Farmer, and had lied to them about
the payment of it, and the Trial Committee found that hfe had
obtained money under false pretenses, and that he was guilty of
lying, as charged.
There is not one syllable of testimony in this case to show that
Bro. Males ever presented a bill to Bro. Farmer and demanded a
single penny, but that in settlement there was some dispute and
difference as to the time, whereupon Bro. Farmer accepted the
account kept by Bro. Males, and also accepted the account
Bro. Males, as to the money paid on the work theretofore
performed by Bro. Males for Bro. Farmer. It is simply the settle-
ment of an account between two neighbors, two friends and brothers
of the same Lodge. It strikes your committee that it is unfair to
drag into the Order cases which have no more foundation in fact
than the case under consideration. Odd Fellowship should be too
sacred ; teachings and principles of the Order should be too bind-
ing upon the consciences of all members to permit a dispute such
as this to find its way into the lodge-room and divide and separate
the members of the Lodge into factions, whereby a discord may
obtain that will ultimately work to the detriment of the Lodge
and decidedly against the better interests of the Order.
We do not believe the Investigating Committee had any right to
prefer the second charge; we know they had no right to prefer the
third charge, in which they speak of the brother having violated
his obligations. In the transcript, that portion of the obligation
which is set up as having been violated is a part of the secret work,
and the Investigating Committee, and all other members of the
Lodge who sanctioned its publication, have certainly forgotten the
binding force of their own obligations, or they would not have'
allowed this charge to have been published and the transcript that
is now in the hands of your committee to have obtained.
- There is absolutely no merit in this case. The brother has been
wrongfully dealt with in the opinion of your committee. The evi-
dence does not show that he obtained money under false pretenses.
He did promise the Investigating Committee that he would try
to fix this matter up. He did not do it as claimed. He claims he
had no opportunity to do it, so that the unsettled condition of an
account between two brothers is made the basis for the charges
against the brother, whereby he is to be suspended from the Lodge
2328 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
for eighteen months, as the finding in this case is — the action of the
Lodge being that the brother should be suspended for the period of
eighteen months.
Your committee can not concur in the action of the Lodge in
this behalf. We think a wrong has been done Brother Males. We
think the Lodge has exceeded its power and its duty toward
Brother Males. We therefore find that this appeal should be sus-
tained, and we recommend the adoption of the following :
Resolved, That the appeal of Brother Joel Males against Morgan
Lodge, No. 211, I. 0. 0. F., be sustained; that the action of Morgan
Lodge, No 211, as against Brother Males, beset aside, and that said
Lodge be directed to restore him to membership and to good stand-
ing in all things in so far as the action in this case is concerned.
John B. Cockrum,
Enoch G. Hogate,
J. B. Kimball,
J. B. Kenner,
. Geo. Shirts.
No. 938. OPINION by ,i. b. kimball, p. «. rep.
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. 0. F., of Indiana :
S. M. Stevens vs. Richland City Lodge, No. 577.
Your Committee on Appeals, to whom was referred the papers in
the case of appeal of S. M. Stevens vs. Richland City Lodge, No.
577, have carefully examined all the papers in this case and find
that Bro. Stevens was taken sick about February 6, 1895, and was
sick two weeks. Bro. Stevens was a married man but was not liv-
ing with his wife. He, Bro. Stevens, sent for his wife and she came.
He asked her to stay with him and nurse him during the day.
He, Bro. Stevens, claims that some of the Relief Committee told
him, also his wife and the landlord, to board Mrs. Stevens while
she was there and that the Lodge would pay her board. This is
denied and the Lodge refused to pay her board, which was $5.25.
This case is not in a proper shape for your committee to make a
decision as to the merits of this case, but we recommend that if
Bro. Stevens desires to do so, he and the Lodge may refer this
claim to a committee of Past Grands, as provided in Chapter IV,
Section 15, of the General Laws.
J. B. Kimball,
J. B. Kenner,
'" 'Geo. Shirts,
John B. Cockrum,
Enoch G. PIogate.
No. 940. opinion by enoch g. hogate, grand rep.
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. F., of Indiana :
B. F. Carl vs. Salamonia Lodge, No. 392.
It appears from the record in this case that prior to May, 1894,
charges were preferred against the appellant, and being convicted
on a trial he was fined $25.00 by his Lodge. On appeal to this Lodge
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2329
the judgment was atiirmed. See Carl vs. Salamonia Lodge, No. 392,
May, 1894, page 2020.
On the 26th day of January, 1895, the appellant filed in his
Lodge a petition, containing eight propositions, asking that said
fine be remitted because he was financially unable to pay the same ;
that he was in good health and his dues were all paid. We do
not set out the reasons given in appellant's petition in full, because
the view we take of the case renders it unnecessary. The petition
was accepted by the Subordinate Lodge and placed on file, and a
motion was made to remit the fine, which motion was lost. A
motion was then made to remit all of the fine but |5.00, and this
motion was lost. A motion was then made to suspend the appel-
lant for eighteen months for non-payment of the $25.00, and that
motion was lost. A motion was then made to expel the appellant
for the non-payment of said fine, and the record informs us that
more than two-thirds having voted to expel, the Noble Grand de-
clared him expelled. The appellant then gave notice of appeal
and filed his grounds in which he claims that the action of the
Lodge in expelling him was "unlawful, inoperative and void." The
Lodge answei'ed the grounds of appeal with a denial.
The judgment of the Lodge in assessing the fine against Bro.
Carl, having been affirmed by the Grand Lodge is forever at rest,
and the validity of that judgment can not now be questioned. Bro.
Carl must pay the fine, if the Lodge does not remit it, if he would
be in good standing with his Lodge. The only question to decide,
therefore, is the validity of the action of the Lodge in expelling
him for the failure to pay the fine.
Section 16, Chapter XV, General Laws, reads as follows:
" The refusal to pay any fine imposed according to law shall sub-
ject the delinquent so refusing to the penalty of suspension or ex-
pulsion, as the Lodge may determine."
We do not understand from this section that a member of a
Lodge, against whom a fine stands, can be expelled from the Lodge
for non-payment of the fine without charges preferred and a regu-
lar trial and finding showing his refusal to pay the fine. The Lodge
in this case acted summarily without notice to the appellant. He
was before the Lodge by petition asking mercy by reason, as he
says, of inability to pay. The Lodge refused this and proceeded
to expel the appellant, presumably from the fact that the records
of the Lodge showed an unpaid fine against the appellant. He
had no day in court to answer to a charge of refusal to pay, and it
should be borne in mind that the law says " refusal.'
It might be that the delinquent member could show an utter in-
ability, by reason of .sickness or lack of opportunity to earn the
money, and these might constitute valid defenses to a charge of "re-
fusal to pay." We do not, however, decide that they would be de-
fenses. This case is somewhat in the nature of a suit on a judg-
mient in our civil courts. There the judgment is pronounced and
is valid. Before a suit could be maintained on the judgment, the
defendant mu^t be notified that he may come into court and show
a payment of the judgment, or make any valid defense he may
have. The court in such a case can not take notice of the fact that
the records show an unpaid judgment and summarily enter a re-
newal of the judgment. In this case the brother was not informed
2330 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
that he was to be proceeded against for the non-payment of a fine.
He has not been heard on "refusing to pay," and yet the extreme
penalty of the law has been inflicted. We do not believe there is
any ofiense mentioned in Chapter XIV General Laws, or any of-
fense cognizable by the laws of our Order, where a penalty may be
inflicted, that the penalty can be imposed without notice to the de-
fendant.
Again the record of the vote showing the expulsion is not given.
The record says : "More than two-thirds having voted to expel for
non-payment of fine, Noble- Grand so declared him expelled."
It is decided over and over by this Grand Lodge that the record
made by the Lodge and the record on appeal must show how
many were present when the vote was taken, and the number
who voted for and and against. This is not done in this case.
May vs. Powers Lodge, No. 495, Nov. 1877, p. 399.
Wortman vs. Caldwell Lodge, No. 271, May 1879, p. 832.
Rollins tw. Princeton Lodge, No. 64, Nov. 1877, p. 350.
Dufor vs. Phcenix Lodge, No. 182, May 1884, p. 227.
For the errors pointed out, we think the action of Salamonie
Lodge, No. 392, in expelling Bro. B. F. Carl, ought to be reversed.
We therefore recommend that this cause be reversed, and that B.
F. Carl be restored to membership in his Lodge. But nothing
herein shall be construed as affecting the fine of twenty-five dollars
assessed against B. F. Carl.
Enoch G. Hogate,
John B. Cockrum,
Geo. Shirts,
J. B. Kimbali,.
No. 941. opinion by j, b. kimb\ll, p. g. rep.
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. F., of Indiana :
Sheridan Lodge, No. 691, vs. Delphi Lodge, No. 28.
Your Committee on Appeals, to whom was referred the papers
in the case of Sheridan Lodge, No. 691, against Delphi Lodge, No.
28, submit the following report :
This case is the original claim of Sheridan Lodge, No. 691,
against Delphi Lodge, No. 28, for $57, which it claims to have paid
Bro. Clayton E. Cox, a member of Delphi Lodge, No. 28, in good
standing, while living in the jurisdiction of Sheridan Lodge, No.
691, on account of sick benefits due to Bro. Cox. Delphi Lodge has
made its answer, but there is no evidence on either side submitted
to your committee by which we can arrive at a correct conclusion
in the case. We therefore recommend the adoption of the follow-
ing:
Resolved, That the case of Sheridan Lodge, No. 691 , against Delphi
Lodge, No. 2S, together with all papers therein, be referred to a
commissioner, to be appointed by the Grand Master, who shall pro-
ceed to notify said Lodges respectively when and where he will
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2331
hear the evidence offered by either Lodge. He shall thereupon
take the evidence, reduce the same to writing, and refer his finding
thereon to the next session of this Grand Lodge.
Respectfully submitted,
J. B. Kimball,
Geo. Shirts,
J. B. Kenner,
John B. Cockrum,
Enoch G. Hogate.
No. 942. opinion by geo. shirts, g. rep.
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. 0. F., of Indiana :
In the case of Aaron Chamberlain vs. Grand Prairie Lodge, No.
164, the record shows that appellant was tried and expelled upon a
charge of failing, neglecting and refusing to provide for his wife.
Two grounds of appeal are stated :
1 . 1 nsufficiency of the charge.
2. Refusal to allow accused to testify as to the cause of such
failure.
Your committee believe that the charge was insufficient for the
reason that it did not charge that such refusal was without cause.
But we do not rest this opinion upon that alone. Upon the trial
the Lodge contented itself with simply showing the fact of such
failure, without in any way attempting to show the cause thereof.
In his defense ajDpellant offered to show the reason why, but all
evidence on this subject was excluded by the Trial Committee. This
was error. If appellant had just grounds to part from his wife, or
for any cause had good grounds for his refusal to provide for her,
he was entitled to be heard. To say the least of it, he was entitled
to show all the circumstances surrounding the case in mitigation of
his supposed ofiense.
We therefore ofter tBe following :
Resolved, That this appeal be sustained ; that a new trial be
granted, and that future proceedings herein, if any, shall be had in
accordance with this opinion.
Enoch G. Hogate,
John B. Cockrum,
Geo. Shirts,
J. B. Kimball,
J. B. Kenner.
No. 943. opinion by j. b. kenner, p. g. m.
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. F., of Indiana :
S. J. Hinkle vs. Saratoga Lodge, No. 703.
Your Committee on Grievances and Appeals to whom was re-
ferred the grievance of S. J. Hinkle against Saratoga Lodge, have
had the same under consideration, and, from the record, find that
the brother was fined by his Lodge for not responding to a call by
his Lodge to watch with a sick brother.
2332 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
Brother H inkle claims he ought to be relieved from that duty
for the reason, as he alleges, that two members of his Lodge agreed
in his st^ad to relieve him of that duty whenever his turn came in
rotation on the roll.
Ee neglected to watch when hi» Lodge notified him, and the
matter seems to have been duly investigated by his Lodge, which
found the excuse and reasons urged by him insufficient and fined
him.
A Lodge has no right to fine a brother without a charge and
trial, but in this case the record shows that an investigation was
had, and after such investigation the fine was made.
We can not disturb the finding of the Lodge. Inasmuch as
they took the evidence we must assume that the evidence justified
the finding. The evidence is not in the record, except as shown by
the grievance and answer of the Lodge and the record. «
Under such circumstances, we must presume the action of the
Lodge correct. We therefore recommend that the grievance and
appeal of Brother Hinkle be dismissed.
J. B. Kennkr,
Enoch G. Uogate,
Geo. Sbirts,
John B. Cockrum,
J. B. Kimball.
No. 944. opinion by .j. b. cockrum, g. rep.
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. O. F., of Indiana :
Adam W. Meek vs. Hudson Lodge, No. 692, L O. O. F.
Your Committee on Grievances and Appeals, to whom was re-
ferred the case of Bro. Adam W. Meek against Hudson Lodge, No.
692, I. 0. 0. F., submit the following report f
In this case charges were presented to the Lodge against Bro.
Meek on the 14th day of September, 1894, and were referred by the
Noble Grand to an Investigating Committee, which Investigating
Committee reported reasonable grounds for the charges and pre-
ferred the same in the name of the committee. The charges were :
1. That Brother Adam W. Meek, at a special meeting of Hud-
son Lodge, No. 692, I. 0. 0. F., on Thursday evening, September
13, 1891, did enter the reception room of said Lodge in a maudlin
or intoxicated condition and attempt to work his way into said
Lodge ; failing in this did then and there use profane and boisterous
language.
2. That Bro. Adam W. Meek, on the evening of September 13,
1894, did use profane and boisterous language on a public street in
Hudson, Steuben county, Indiana, while in a maudlin or intoxi-
cated condition.
Upon these charges being presented the Noble Grand appointed
a Trial Committee. The accused was regularly notified and furn-
ished with a copy of the charges, and the time for the trial was
fixed for October 3, 1894, at two o'clock p. m., at the Lodge Hall of
Hudson Lodge, No 692. At the time Bro. Meek appeared before
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2333
the committee and pleaded guilty to the charges as made. He
submitted his plea of guilty in writing, and tlie committee ap-
pointed, after considering his plea, found both charges sustained,
whereupon they made their report to the Lodge accordingly, and,
on the Lodge night of October 18, 1894, the Noble Grand of the
Lodge announced the consideration of the report in order and
thereupon the Lodge voted by slip ballots, to sustain the finding
of the Trial Committee, and the Lodge then voted by slip ballots,
on the highest penalty, expulsion, which resulted fifteen in favor
of expulsion and four against, and the defendant, Bro. Adam W.
Meek, was declared expelled. And from such action and decision
of the Lodge in his case, Bro. Meek prosecutes his appeal to the
Grand Lodge, and submits his written statement of appeal to the
Grand Lodge, which has come to your committee.
The reasons assigned for an appeal are :
1. That the trial was irregular from the beginning, and the
Constitution and By-Laws governing such proceedings were wholly
disregarded.
In this contention your committee can not concur. The pro-
ceedings were entirely in conformity with the general laws, and
your committee do not find that the first specification as cause for
appeal is sustained.
The second assignment of appeal is that citizens that were not
members of the Order were cognizant and apprised of the proceed-
ings to be had in said Lodge in relation to the charges preferred
against Bro. Meek prior to the time the said charge was heard in
the said Lodge.
Of course this is a matter that should not have been given any
prominence at all, and the Lodge certainly took no action as a
Lodge by which the fact became public, and therefore, it could not
be charged againet the Lodge as a body that such an action was any
cause of irregularity upon the trial. The members of the Order
who thoughtlessly said anything about the trial being had upon any
such charges, if they did so, acted very wrongfully toward Bro.
Meek and toward their Lodge, but such action is not a matter that
can be taken advantage of in the consideration of this Appeal.
The third assignment of appeal is that the members that pre-
ferred the charges did, before the vote was taken to determine the
guilt or innocence of the accused, solicit, influence and request Bro.
Charles Parnell and others to vote to expel the accused.
Whether this be true or not, there is nothing in the record to
show the truth or falsity of the position assumed, and the bare
charge made as a cause for appeal of course will not be considered
by your committee. There is nothing in this specification of appeal
that entitles the claim of Bro. Meek to any consideration.
The fourth assignment is that an accurate vote was not taken
and counted by said Lodge on sustaining the decision of the Trial
Committee and that said vote was taken by and on paper slips, and
that the same was not tallied when taken, but that after said count,
on demand of members of the said Lodge, all of said paper slips
that could be found were re-counted and then tallied.
This assignment of irregularity and as cause for appeal of this
case to the Grand Lodge has been considered by your committee.
The law upon the subject of voting upon questions of this charac-
2334 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
ter is that the vote must be had by ballot. The vote on the de-
cision of the Trial Committee was properly taken, and therefore,
this charge is no cause for a reversal of this ca^e.
The fifth assignment for the appeal of Brother Meek, is that
when the vote was taken to expel the said member, paper slips
were used for ballots, one member of said Lodge writing and
making the ballots on slips for several other members of said
Lodge to vote, aside from himself.
Paper ballots could be used to vote upon this question, and there
was nothing wrong in one member writing and making ballots for
other members to vote. The law upon this subject is that the ballot
must be had upon the question of punishment, including the
question of whether or not the Lodge will expel a member, but the
kind of ballots is not mentioned, whether by ball ballots, paper
ballots, or slip ballots as in this case, so that the action of the
Lodge in this behalf was correct.
There are several other charges set out in the statement of
appeal of Brother Meek, which your committee do not deem it
advisable to take up the time of the Grand Lodge to cite, or to
recount, for the reason that the record does not show facts to base
them upon so that we come to the conclusion at this time that the
appeal in this case must be dismissed.
Your committee therefore recommend the following :
Resolved, That the appeal of Brother Adam W. Meek against
Hudson Lodge, No. 692, I. 0. O. F., be dismissed.
Geo. Shirts,
Enoch G. Hogatk,
John B. Cockrum, i
J. B. Kimball,
J. B. Kenner.
No. 945. opinion bv j. b. kimball, p. g. rep.
To the Grand- Lodge, I. 0. 0. F., of Indiana :
W. H. Fisher vs. Johnson Lodge, No. 76.
Your Committee on Appeals, having carefully considered the
appeal of Johnson Lodge, No. 76, from the Committee of Past
Grands, find that on November 9, 1894, Bro. W. H. Fisher received
a cut on his left hand that nearly severed the thumb from his hand.
He applied to his Lodge for benefits. The Relief Committee, after
investigating his case, reported adverse to allowing the claim. Bro.
Fisher then appealed to a committee of Past Grands, who were
properly appointed ; time was set to hear the case, the committee
met, and the only evidence introduced was that of Bro. Fisher and
the physician's certificate, which certificate and his evidence show
that he was entirely unable to use his left hand for any purpose.
Bro. Fisher was working as a hand in the meat-market of his son,
and says he was in the shop every day, but was unable to do any
work, except when a customer came to the shop, if there was meat
cut such as they wanted, he could weigh it for them. As a compen-
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2335
sation for his remaining in tlie shop he took what meat his family
used. There is nothing to show that he received any other com-
pensation. The Committee of Past Grands considered the case,
heard the evidence and reported, finding Bro. Fisher entitled to
three weeks' benefits, $15. From their decision Johnson Lodge ap-
peals to this Grand Lodge. That while it is true that Bro. Fisher's
affliction was not of such a nature as to confine him to his house, it
was of such a nature as to totally disable him from doing any work
that required both of his hands to perform it. We therefore
offer the following :
Resolved, That this appeal be dismissed and the report and find-
ing of the Committee of Past Grande be affirmed, and Johnson
Lodge directed to pay the amount of this claim.
Respect^Uy submitted,
J. B. Kimball,
J. B. Kenner,
Geo. Shirts,
John B. Cockrum,
Enoch G. Hcgatb.
No. 946. opinion by enoch a. hogate, g. rep. x^0^30dL2
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. O. F., of Indiana:
Thomas Williamson vs. Utilis Lodge, No. 260.
Your Committee on Grievances and Appeals report that they have
examined the papers in this case, and find the following facts in
substance :
Utilis Lodge, No. 260, at one time passed a by-law and submitted
the same to this Grand Body for ratification. This Lodge decided
that the by-law in question was one beyond the power of a Subor-
dinate Lodge to enact. Again the Subordinate Lodge passed a by-
law, embodying in it the substance of what the Grand Lodge had
ruled could not be enacted. Bro. Williamson appealed from the
action of the Lodge. The papers sent up are signed by the appel-
lant, Thomas Williamson, alone, and not in any official capacity,
and without a certificate of the Secretary and seal of the Lodge.
We can give this case no further consideration for the reason,
1. That " the Grand Lodge shall not have jurisdiction of any
grievance by petition, memorial or otherwise which shall not have
first been presented to and acted upon by the Subordinate Lodge
interested or involved in the matter."
2. The papers are not certified by the Noble Grand and Secre-
tary, and authenticated by the seal of the Lodge.
We therefore recommend that this appeal be dismissed.
Enoch G. Hogate,
John B Cockrum,
J. B. Kimball, ■
J. B. Kenner,
Geo. Shirts.
2336 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
No. 948. OPINION BY J. B. KENNER, P. G. M.
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. F., of Indiana :
G. B. Havens vs. Warrick Lodge, No. 379.
Your Committee on Grievances and Appeals to whom was re-
ferred the appeal of Bro. G. B. Havens from the action of Warrick
Lodge, No. 379, in expelling him, have had the same under consid-
eration. We find that Brother Havens was charged by a com-
mittee—
1. That he converted to his own use Lodge funds while Perma-
nent Secretary.
2. Pasturing on a lot belonging to the Lodge.
3. Improper language used in the course of debate.
4. Falsehood.
5. Dishonesty toward a person not a member of the Order.
Upon this charge he was tried, he having admitted the truth of
the second.
The Trial Committee sustained the first charge, the second sus-
tained in part, the third charge sustained, the fourth not sustained,
and the fifth was dismissed.
We find that the evidence under the first charge of converting
to his own use the money of the Lodge consisted of his being short
in his accounts as Permanent Secretary, about $2.00. This shortage
was found by the Auditing Committee, and Brother Havens promptly
paid it, and we are unable to find, from the evidence, any intention
upon the part of Brother Havens to willfully wrong the Lodge.
The evidence under the second charge shows that Brother Ha-
vens did pasture a horse on a lot that the Lodge owned, but the
committee finds that such pasturing did the lot no damage.
The evidence under the third charge shows that the improper
language used was language used in debate in the Lodge meetings,
or in conversations while the Lodge was not in session. We have
carefully read all the evidence, and find no language used which
would warrant expulsion from the Order. The members had heated
debates, and strong language was used on both sides, and, besides
this, certain rejjorts had been, it seems, circulated on the outside of
the lodge-room about Brother Havens, reflecting on his honesty; at
least Brother Havens heard such, and this exasperated him, and
probably caused him to be more intemperate in his language than
he otherwise would have been.
The fourth charge was not sustained.
This statement seems to be a fair abstract of the points shown
by the evidence.
While your committee always feel disposed to uphold the ver-
dict and findings of trials in Lodges, yet the membership of a
brother in our Order is too sacred to be taken from him unless he
is properly convicted of some oflense against the Order.
The evidence is so meager that it is doubtful whether it shows
any real offense. Certainly it is not strong enoiagh to warrant the
visitation on him of the highest penalty known to our Order.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2337
We fear that the disputes and wrangling in the Lodge prior to
the trial, placed some ot its members in a prejudiced frame of mdnd
against the accused, and operated against a fair trial.
We can not sustain this judgment.
We therefore offer the following ;
Resolved, That the appeal of Bro. G. B. Havens from the action
of Warrick Lodge, No. 379, in expelling him, be sustained, and the
action of the Lodge reversed, and that Bro. Havens be restored to
membership.
J. B. Kenner,
Enoch G. Hogate,
John B. Cockrum,
J. B. Kimball,
Geo. Shirts.
No. 949. OPINION OF J. B. COCKRaM, G. REP.
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. O. F., of Indiana :
Rossville Lodge, No. 183, I. 0. 0. F., vs. John J. Fisher.
Your Committee on Grievances and Appeals, to whom was
referred the appeal of Rossville Lodge, No. 183, I. O. O. F., against
Bro John J. Fisher, submit the following report :
This is an appeal from the action of a Committee of Past Grande
upon a claim for benefits presented to the appellant, Eossville
Lodge, No. 183, by Bro. John J. Fisher. His claim was presented
for benefits from August 29, 1894, to September 29, 1894, and the
same was rejected by the Lodge and an appeal was taken to a Com-
mittee of Past Grands, the Lodge selecting P. G. W. A. Morris, and
Bro. Fisher selecting P. G. W. H. McGuire, and the two so selected
selecting P. G. W. G. Morris, all of Frankfort Lodge, No. 108, to
try the case.
On the 20th day of December, 1894, the committee met at the
hall of Rossville Lodge, No. 183, and examined the witnesses. After
considering all of the case the committee made the following
report :
" We, the committee selected to hear the appeal case of Bro.
John J. Fisher against Rossville Lodge, No. 183, would make the
following report: We find that Bro. Fisher's disability commenced
August 29, 1894, and that the Relief Committee was formally
notified about October 13, 1894. Section IX, Article 4, By-Laws of
Rossville Lodge; also. Section VII, Chapter 4, General Laws of
Indiana, provide that no claim for sick benefits shall be allowed for
a longer period than four weeks prior to such notice being given. It
has been proven that Bro. Fisher was unable to follow his usual
vocation or to earn a livelihood from August 29, 1894, to Sej^tember
29, 1894. Therefore, benefit*? should commence four weeks prior to
notice, or September 15, 1894, and end at termination of sickness,
September 29, 1894.
2338 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
" We are, therefore, of the opinion that the action of the Lodge
should be reversed and that Bro. John J. Fisher be allowed two
weeks' benefits. Respectfully submitted in F., L. and T."
Signed by the committee.
The testimony in the record tends to support the action of the
committee and we think the committee was justified in its con-
clusion upon the evidence.
When the rej^ort made by the committee was submitted to the
Lodge, a motion was made that it be received and placed on the
minutes, which motion prevailed, and thereupon a motion was
made that the Lodge appeal to the Grand Lodge of Indiana from
the decision of the committee selected to try the case, and that the
Secretary make out the necessary transcript and forward the same
to the Grand Lodge, which was done.
The action of the committee of Past Grands in this case is
thoroughly sustained and justified by the evidence, and your com-
mittee is of the opinion that an injustice would be done both to
Brother Fisher and to Rossville Lodge, to disturb the action of the
Past Grands' Committee. We therefore offer the following :
Resolved, That the appeal of Rossville Lodge, No. 183, I. O. 0. F.
against Brother John J. Fisher be dismissed and that the action of
the Past Grands' Committee, selected by the Lodge and Brother
Fisher, be in all things approved, and Rossville Lodge be, and the
same is hereby directed to pay to Brother Fisher the benefits found
to be due to him by the Past Grands' Committee aforesaid.
j. b. cockrum,
Geo. Shirts,
• Enoch G. Hogate,
J. B. Kimball,
J B. Kenner.
No. 951. OPINION BY .J. B. KENNER, P. G. M.
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. F. , of Indiana :
Ashboro Lodge, No. 251, vs. Center Point Lodge, No. 700.
Your Committee on Grievances and Appeals, to whom was re-
ferred the grievance and claim of Ashboro Lodge vs. Center Point
Lodge, have considered the same, and find from the papers that
Center Lodge filed some sort of a charge against Ashboro Lodge,
and a Special Deputy was appointed to investigate the same, and
such proceedings were had as that the Special Deputy found no
merit in the charge, and dismissed it.
It seems that Ashboro Lodge brought some seven witness a dis-
tance of several miles, for the purpose of giving testimony. Now
Ashboro Lodge claims that Center Point Lodge should be com-
pelled to pay fees and mileage of these witnesses, together with
the services of the secretary in making the service, etc., and prays
this Grand Lodge to compel by mandate such payment in the
total sum of $15r65.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2339
While your committee believes there ought to be a law to tax
costs in such a case against the losing party, yet we know of no law
authorizing or warranting it under our laws at the present time.
We, therefore, recommend that the claim be dismissed.
J. B. Kenner,
Enoch G. Hogate,
• j. b. cockrum,
J. B. Kimball, ^
Geo. Shirts.
No. 952. OPINION BY J. B. KIMBALL, P. G. KEP.
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. O. F., of Indiana :
Daniel Emery vs. Oakland Lodge, No. 534.
Your Committee on Appeals, to whom was referred the papers
in the case of appeal of Daniel Emery vs. Oakland Lodge, No. 534,
having carefully examined all the papers in this case, find that
John W. Teal was initiated* in Oakland Lodge March 15, 1878, and
that on September 27, 1882, he applied for and received the three
degrees as per our present work, and they were conferred on him
without fee. At the May session of this Grand Lodge, 1882, the
following resolution was adopted (see page 1743 of this Grand
Lodge), as follows :
" Resolved, That all Lodges in this jurisdiction have the privilege
to confer the three degrees upon all initiatory members who apply
for the same within three months from July 1, 1882, without fee."
This brother applied for the degrees September 27, 1882, which was
within the three months specified, consequently he was entitled to
receive the degrees withovit fee. It seems that lately a controversy
has arisen among the members of Oakland Lodge about the pay-
ment of the degree fee, and Bro. Teal has offered to pay to the
Lodge five dollars, provided the Lodge would give him a receipt in
full for those degrees ; and this proposition the Lodge has accepted
and agreed to, and from this action Bro. Emery appeals, and from
this appeal your committee offer the following ;
Resolved, That this appeal be dismissed and the action of the
Lodge be affirmed.
J. B. Kimball,
John B. Cockrum,
Geo. Shirts,
Enoch G. Hogate,
J. B. Kenner.
2340 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
No. 953. OPINION BY J. B. COCKRUM, G. REP.
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. O. F., of Indiana:
Aaron B. Templeton vs. Capital Lodge, No. 124.
Your Committee on Grievances and Appeals, to whom is referred
the appeal of Aaron B. Templeton against Capital Lodge, No. 124,
L 0. 0. F., submit the following report:
In this case charges were presented on the 2d day of November,
1894, by an Investigating Committee, pursuant to the requirements
of the General Laws, charging Bro. Templeton with conduct unbe-
coming an Odd Fellow, specifying therein certain statements and
charges of public indecency on his part, the particulars of which
we do not deem it necessary to set out in this opinion.
The Noble Grand thereupon appointed a Trial Committee, to
whom the charges were referred, and subsequent thereto a trial
was had, and the finding of the committee was to the eflect that
one of the specifications set out in the charges was sustained and
the other specification was not sustained.
The specification that was not sustained was a specific charge of
indecency at a particular time in the presence of particular persons,
the names, circumstances and facts concerning which we do not
deem necessary to set out at length in this opinion.
The charge that was sustained was that on or about the 11th
day of October, 1894, the appellant was tried and found guilty in
the Police Court in the city of Indianapolis of the crime of public
indecency, which charge the evidence in the record fully sustained.
We do not need to set out the evidence of the particular wit-
nesses, nor to set out at length the finding of the Police Court, but
submit that it is true that the brother was charged upon affidavit
in the Police Court with the crime stated in the specifications, and
was found guilty in that court and sentenced to pay a fine of
twenty-five dollars ($25 00) and costs, which fine was replevied and
paid.
The evidence of certain witnesses in the record is to the effect
that the finding upon the charge in the Police Court is correct, as
several testified to certain acts which would go to show that the
offense had been committed as charged.
The grounds of appeal, as stated in the statement signed by the
appellant, in the opinion of your committee are not valid, and we
do not deem it necessary to take up the time of the Grand Lodge
or incumber the record with setting out at length any of the spe-
cific allegations of appeal.
We find that this case has been fairly tried, and the judgment
of the Lodge is that the offense committed by the brother, for
which he was found guilty, was sufficient to expel him from the
Order. In this judgment your committee fully concurs, and we
believe the evidence sustains the finding, the conclusions of the
committee and the Lodge, and further that the proceedings upon
the trial were all regular, and that this appeal should be dismissed.
We therefore recommend the following:
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2341
Resolved, That the appeal of Bro. Aaron B. Templeton against
Capital Lodge, No. 124, I. 0. 0. F., be dismissed and that the action
of Capital Lodge in this behalf be in all things affirmed.
John B. Cockrum,
Geo. Shirts,
Enoch G. Hogate,
J. B. Kimball,
J. B. Kenner.
No. 955. opinion by .i. b. kenner, p. g. m.
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. F., of Indiana :
Indianapolis Lodge, No. 465, vs. George W. Bone.
Your Committee on Grievances and Appeals to whom was re-
ferred the appeals of Indianapolis Lodge, No. 465, from the action
of a committee of Past Grands in awarding Bro. Bone one week's
sick benefits, have had the same under consideration.
We find that the brother claimed benefits for three weeks, but
his Lodge refused to allow him any part of it, whereupon a com-
mittee of Past Grands was duly appointed, and after taking much
testimony, awarded him one week's benefits.
Your committee have read over the evidence and we can not
say that the award pf the committee was wrong.
The Past Grands heard all the evidence carefully, saw each wit-
ness face to face, and could thereby judge best as to the credit to
be given to each and all, and your committee believe that their
finding should not be disturbed ; furthermore the appeal is very
irregular, as there is no statement of appeal nor any reasons given
why the finding should not be sustained, and for this reason alone
if none other existed, this appeal must be dismissed, but for the
reasons first set out we think the finding of the Committee of Past
Grands should be approved.
We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed, and the
award of the Committee of Past Grands be approved.
J. B. Kenner,
Enoch G. Hogate,
J. B. Kimball,
Geo. Shirts,
John B. Cockrum.
No. 956. opinion by j. b. kimball, p. g. rep. .
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. O. F., of Indiana :
John Vanzant vs. Richmond Lodge, No. 254.
Your Committee on Appeals have examined the papers in the
case of appeal of Richmond Lodge, No. 254, vs. a Committee of Past
Grands This is a case in which Bro. John Vanzant filed a claim in
his Lodge for two weeks' benefits, with a physician's certificate of
2342 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
his disability. The Relief Committee investigated his claim and
reported adversely to allowing his claim, after vphich Bro. Vanzant
asked an appeal to a committee of Past Grrands, and he selected
Past Grand C. E. Newman, of No. 41 ; the Lodge appointed Past
Grand Jepe. H, Brooks, of No. 212, and they selected Past Grand
C. A. Bartel, of No. 199. The committee organized with C. A. Bartel
as Chairman and C. E. Newman as Secretary, who also acted as at-
torney for Bro. Varzant. The Lodge appointed A. K. Deets as the
attorney for the Lodge. The committee met, heard the testimony,
which was reduced to writing, and we have had the evidence be-
fore us. Bro. Newman, on behalf of Bro. Vanzant, presented a
statement that Bro. Vanzant made to him (Bro. Newman), and
asked that it be taken as evidence. Bro. Deets, the attorney for
the Lodge, objected to its being received as evidence, for the reason
that the Lodge had no notice of such a statement being made and
therefore had no opportunity to question Bro. Vanzant in regard to
this statement. The Committee of Past Grands overruled this ob-
jection and did receive that statement as evidence. This, your
committee think, was an error. Bro. Vanzant should have been
present and given his testimony in person ; or the Lodge should
have had the privilege of being present when that statement was
made by Bro. Vanzant, so that they might have had the privilege
of knowing what that statement was before it was presented. The
next evidence, and, in fact, the only evidence produced by Bro.
Vanzant, was the certificate of J. S. Harold, M. D., which is as fol-
lows : " This is to certify that I examined John Vanzant on Sep-
tember 16, and found him suffering from chronic enlargement of
the liver, feeble circulation with general prostration, and that he
has been unable to perform manual labor from that time to this,
September 16 to 30." Bro. Vanzant, as it is shown, owned a small
farm, on which he kept some cows and horses, etc. His folks make
butter and he takes it to Richmond and sells and delivers it to his
customers. A number of witnesses testify that he, Vanzant, said,
at all times when visited, that he all the time fed his cows and
horse, cleaned out his stable and performed such other chores as
were necessary to be done. Bro. W. A. Johnson testified that he
had bought his butter of Bro. Vanzant for three or four years, and
that Bro. Vanzant delivered butter to him every week for which he
claims benefits, and he did not know that he was sick. The Noble
Grand, Vice-Grand and Secretary visited him, and also the doctor
that made the above certificate, and they all testify that the doc-
tor said that he knew Vanzant was a farmer and that he was able
to conduct his business and do such work as was necessary for him
to do. Your committee do not wish to be misunderstood. We have
not weighed the evidence in this case, but fail to find any evidence
that would sustain the findings. We therefore offer the following :
Resolved, That this appeal be sustained and the action of the Past
Grands' Committee be set aside. Respectfully submitted,
J. B. Kimball,
Enoch G. Hogate,
John B. Cockrum,
J. B. Kenner,
Gko. Shirts.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2343
No. 957. OPINION BY JOHN B. COCKRUM, G. REP.
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. 0. F., of Indiana :
George W. Pitts vs. Philoxenian Lodge No. 44, I. 0. 0. F.
Your Committee on Grievances and Appeals, to whom has been
referred the Appeal of Bro. Geo. W. Pitts, against Philoxenian
Lodge, No. 44, submit the following report;
The case is an appeal from the action of a committee of Past
Grands, appointed as provided in Section 15, Chapter IV of the Gen-
eral Laws, to try the question of whether or not Bro. Pitts was en-
titled to benefits from the Lodge from August 17, 1894, to October
10, 1894, amounting to $40. The committee of Past Grands were
selected at the request of Bro. Pitts, and was composed of members
of three different Lodges, none of them members of Philoxenian
Lodge. After a fair trial the committee of Past Grands found that
Bro. Pitts was not entitled to the benefits claimed. From this de-
cision the present appeal is prosecuted. The grounds of appeal most
strongly urged by Bro. Pitts are, (1) that the finding of the com-
mittee of Past Grands was contrary to law, and (2) that the finding
of the committee of Past Grands is contrary to the evidence. Your
committee have carefully gone over the record, and have heard the
argument offered by both parties, and after a full consideration we
can find no reason to disturb the action of the committee of Past
Grands. This Grand Lodge has repeatedly decided, and the de-
cisions have been for many years acted upon, that it will not re-
verse the action of a Past Grands' committee when there is evidence
in the I'ecord to support the finding of such committee. In this
case there is abundant evidence to sustain the Past Grands' com-
mittee, and your committee recommend the adoption of the follow-
ing :
Resolved, That the appeal of Bro. Geo. W. Pitts against Philox-
enian Lodge, No. 44, I. 0. 0. F., be dismissed.
John B. Cockrum,
Geo. Shirts,
J. B. Kenner,
J. B. Kimball,
Enoch G. Hogate.
No. 958. OPINION BY GEO. SHIRTS, G. REP.
To the. Grand Lodge, I. O. 0. F., of Indiana :
Your Conamittee on Appeals makes the following report in the
case of Bro. M Gish vs. Covington Lodge, No. 21 :
Appellant prosecutes this claim for benefits before a committee
of Past Grands, which committee found that appellant was entitled
to nothing.
The record on appeal is quite informal, but, as no objection has
been made thereto, and it eufficiently appears therefrom what the
controversy is, we have concluded to give our opinion on the
matter.
2344 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
Appellant joined said Lodge more than twenty years ago, but
never advanced farther than the Initiatory Degree. When he ap-
plied for the degrees, years ago, the Lodge refused to advance him
upon the grounds that at initiation he had represented that he was
in good health, when, in fact, he was then in bad health. But he
has remained an initiate member of said Lodge ever since, no
steps having been taken to revoke his membership for that, or
any other cause. The Lodge contested this claim for benefits upon
the sole ground of such alleged fradulent representations at initia-
tion, and did not introduce any proof upon the subject of his actual
condition during the period for which benefits were claimed, and,
we must assume that the committee of Past Grands decided for the
Lodge upon the ground thus assumed by it, for there can be no
doubt, under the evidence in this record, that appellant was entitled
to benefits unless debarred by such alleged representations. But,
under the decisions of the Sovereign Grand Lodge, as well as those
of this Grand Body, the Lodge can not successfully defend this
case upon the ground assumed by it. For many years the Lodge
has known of such representations, because when the degrees were
applied for the Lodge refused on account thereof. It was then the
duty of the Lodge promptly to cause charges to be preferred and
his membership severed. Having knowledge of the supposed
fraud, and failing to take steps promptly for its relief therefrom,
the Lodge must be held to have waiv'ed the same. And now, when
appellant has grown old in years, and after twenty years have
elapsed since the supposed representations were made, the Lodge
can not be permitted to urge them in defense of a claim for
benefits.
May ISSl, p. 1439.
We thereiore offer the following :
Resolved, That this appeal be sustained; that the finding and
judgment of the said Past Grands' committee be set aside, and that
any further proceedings herein shall be had and taken in accord-
ance with this opinion.
Geo. Shirts,
J. B. Kimball,
J. B. Kenner,
Enoch G. Hogate,
John B. Cockrum.
No. 960. opinion by geo. shirts, g. rep.
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. F., of Indiana :
A memorial from Bro. Alpheus Morris has been referred to your
committee. It asks for an opinion concerning his rights to further
benefits from Greencastle Lodge. We have concluded to answer it,
but of course this opinion can not be binding on said Lodge, for it
has not had notice.
Bro. Morris prosecuted a claim for benefits against said Lodge ;
the case was here one or more times, and finally went to the Sov-
ereign Grand Lodge. Eventually all matters growing out of such
claims were settled by agreement of the parties, and the Lodge
paid the sum agreed upon.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2345
With this Bro. Morris must be content. We know of no way to
open the matter up, nor any reason why it should be opened up, and
we therefore ask to be discharged from the further consideration of
this matter.
Geo. Shirts,
J. B. Kimball,
J. B. Kenner,
Enoch G. Hogatb,
John B. Cockrum.
No. 947. opinion by geo. shirts, g. rep.
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. F., of Indiana :
Your Committee on Appeals, in the case of Charles Mund vs.
Moltke Lodge, No. 674, report as follows :
The charge in this case recited that on the 14th day of November,
1894, the Circuit Court of Lake county handed down a judgment
in tlie case of the State of Indiana against appellant, wherein
appellant was fined 1100.00, sentenced to jail for five days and dis-
franchised for one year.
This charge was quite informal in that it only pleaded the evi-
dence, whereas it should have charged the accused with the crime.
To this charge appellant pleaded guilty, with some reservations,
and on that he was expelled.
If the case stood alone on the above facts, we would not feel
warranted in reversing the judgment. But there has been filed
with us the official statement of the D. D. G. M. of that district, to
the effect that the result of this case was not satisfactory to the
Lodge, and we have concluded that justice will be best subserved
by granting a new trial, when all parties may have a fair and im-
partial hearing, and we therefore offer the following:
Resolved, That this appeal be sustained; that the Lodge have
leave to prefer new charges, if it desires, and that any further pro-
ceedings herein shall be had and taken in accordance with this
resolution.
Geo. Shirts,
Enoch G. Hogatb,
J. B. Kimball,
J. B. Kenner,
Jno. B. Cockrum.
No. 950. opinion by geo. shirts, g. rep.
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. O. F., of Lidiana :
Your Committee on Appeals have examined the case L. H. Wil-
lis vs. Sullivan Lodge, No. 147, and beg leave to report :
Charges were preferred in said Lodge against the appellant on
the 19th day of January, 1894, for assault and battery with intent
to kill one Wm. C. Hultz, and, in another paragraph charging him
with the murder of said Hultz.
2346 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
A Trial Committee was duly appointed, and the yth day of Feb-
ruary, 1894, was set for the day of trial.
Upon notice given to the accused, he failed to appear at the trial,
and the Trial Committee so reported to the Lodge, without having
taken any evidence whatever upon the merits ot the case.
Thereupon, a new investigating committee was appointed, who
reported charges against appellant for contempt in failing to appear
and answer at said trial on Febi'uary 9, and, on notice of trial upon
said last named trial, appellant again failed to appear, and for these
reasons alone, he was tried and expelled for contempt.
It appears, without any dispute whatever, that the killing, which
was the subject of this controversy, occurred on the 24th day of
December, 1893, and that appellant was at once arrested and thrown
into the Sullivan county jail, and duly indicted for murder in the
first degree, under which charge, of course, he could not be ad-
mitted to bail. He was afterward transferred to the jail in Knox
county, where said criminal case had been sent on change of venue,
in which jail he remained until September 20, 1894, at which time
his trial for said alleged offense was concluded, resulting in- his
acquittal of said charge and release from imprisonment. From his
long imprisonment he was worn in body and mind, his farm and
property needed his attention, and time was required to straighten
out his financial affairs owing to the expense incident to his trial
and his enforced absence from his business.
We are met at the threshold of this case with a motion to dis-
miss this appeal on the ground that the appeal was not taken
within the time required by the law.
Section 15, Chapter XI, General Laws, provides that such appeal
shall be taken to the next session of the Grand Lodge, if possible.
It will thus be seen that the law does not absolutely cut off an ap-
peal if not taken to the next session, but leaves, for the decision of
every case, the question whether the failure to appeal is justified by
the circumstances.
The Lodge does not contend in this case that appellant lost his
right to appeal on account of not bringing the case here in May,
1894, because it admits that appellant was then in prison. But it
does contend that, appellant having been released September 20,
1894, that the appeal is barred because not taken to the November
session, 1894. But your committee think otherwise. We believe
that, under the extraordinary circumstances of this case, appellant's
long confinement, his trial for his life, and the consequent derange-
ment both of his physical nature and his financial affairs, that he
ought not to be denied the privilege of a hearing in the Grand
Lodge.
We are the more inclined to this opinion for the reason that we
believe he was not properly nor justly expelled from his Lodge.
As above shown, at the time the first charge was presented
against appellant he was incarcerated in the county jail, and he was
likewise so confined at the time of his expulsion. But his trial in
the State court, on the charge of murder, had not taken place, and
it was not proper to require him to disclose his defense thereto, nor
any part thereof, in a trial in the Lodge for the .same offense. It is
true the evidence shows that the sheriff was willing to take the ac-
cused to the lodge-room to attend these trials, but under such cir-
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2347
cumstances it is manifest that the accused would have stood upon
an unequal footing. Besides this, in the State law, a party accused
of crime can not be required to testify, nor can his refusal to do so
be commented upon by the State, much less be made the foundation
for an action for contempt. Our laws provide that in cases not pro-
vided for in our laws the laws of the State shall apply, and, we
think, in cases such as this, it ought not to be held that the accused
should be required to answer, or show cause, or take any steps in a
proceeding in the Lodge in advance of his trial in the civil courts.
We are the more inclined to this view where, as here, after a
regular trial in the courts, where eminent counsel on both sides
have been employed, the accused has been entirely exonerated
from the terrible crime charged.
We are, therefore, of opinion that it was not contempt for the
accused to fail to appear at these trials, under the peculiar and ex-
traordinary circumstances disclosed by this record, and that his ex-
pulsion from the Order on account thereof should not be allowed
to stand, and we offer the following:
Resolved, That this appeal be sustained ; that the judgment of
expulsion herein ,be set aside and that appellant be restored to
membership in his Lodge.
Geo. Shirts,
J. B. Kimball,
Enoch G. Hogate,
J. B. Kenner,
John B. Cockrum.
No. 959. OPINION BY ENOCH G. HOGATE, G. REP.
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. 0. F., of Indiana :
Reuben Koontz i;.<;. Greensboro Lodge, No. 247, I. O. O. F.
The Committee on Appeals, to whom was referred the above-
entitled cause, report as follows :
Brother Reuben Koontz had his index finger cut in an effort to
remove a fruit can from the hoof of his cow. The wound was a
painful one, and prevented the brother from performing all the
duties of his trade, that of carpenter. Brother Koontz filed a claim
in the Lodge for two weeks' benefits. The Lodge refused to pay,
and an appeal was taken to the Committee of Past Grands. The
result of the trial was that the committee denied the benefits
claimed, and allowed Brother Koontz nothing for his disability.
An appeal was properly taken.
If the Committee of Past Grands had decided this cause the
othei" way we would not feel, under the evidence, like recommend-
ing that such a decision be disturbed. There is evidence tending
to support the finding of the committee, and this being the case,
under the well settled rule of this Grand Lodge, we can not dis-
turb the finding ; to do so would constitute the Lodges judges of
the weight of the evidence and the credibility of the witnesses.
Brother Koontz makes complaint in his grounds of appeal that
the evidence is imperfectly set out in the record, and does not dis-
close the burden of what the witnesses testified to. We are in-
2348 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
clined to believe that this complaint is well founded. The evidence
is given in narrative form, and professes to be only the substance.
But Brother Koontz did not take any steps in the Subordinate
Lodge to have the record corrected and perfected. He only as-
signs it as a ground of appeal. If he v?ould have the record dif-
ferent, or fuller, or more perfect, he ought have looked after it be-
low, and if denied a completer record, then, by a proper showing,
this body could have ordered all the proceedings here for review.
We do not understand that there is more record in this case than
is before us. It may be not much of the evidence was taken. Of
this we can not say. We therefore recommend the following :
Resolved, That the appeal of Brother Reuben Koontz be dis-
> missed. Enoch G. Hogatb,
J. B. Kimball,
Geo. Shirts,
John B. Cockrum,
J. B. Kenner.
No. 954. opinion by enocii g. hogate, g. rep.
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. 0. F., of Indiana:
E. G. Coverdale vs. St. Mary's Lodge, No. 167.
Your committee begs leave to report on this case as follows :
Bro. E. G. Coverdale, a member of St. Mary's Lodge, No. 167,
filed in said Lodge a claim for benefits. The Lodge disallowed the
claim, and an appeal was taken to the Committee of Past Grands.
The committee heard the evidence and reported that Bro. Cover-
dale was not entitled to benefits. Bro. Coverdale appeals from the
.decision of the Past Grands, and assigns as grounds of appeal that
the finding is not warranted by the evidence.
We have read the evidence in this case over carefully, together
with the briefs of counsel, and find that there is evidence tending
to sustain the finding of the Past Grands. The evidence is con-
flicting. The witnesses were before the committee. They saw their
manner in testifying, and are better able to judge of the weight of
the evidence than are we. In this state of the case we must be
content with the finding of the committee.
Personette U5. Green's Fork Lodge, No. 184, May, 1880, p. 1151.
Laswell vs. Pisgah Lodge, No. 543, Nov., 1881, pp. 1569, 1585.
We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.
Enoch G. Hogatb,
J. B. Kimball,
Geo. Shirts,
John B. Cockrum.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2349
No. 961. OPINION BY ENOCH G. HOGATE, G. REP.
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. O. F., of Indiana:
Ex parte, J. R. Sutherlin.
Your Committee on Appeals, to whom was submitted the appeal
of J. R. Sutherlin, D. D. G. M., from the Grand Master, submit the
following :
The record in this case shows that one, H. C. Hobbs, applied for
membership in Salem Lodge, No. 67. His application was referred
to a committee, and that committee reported favorably, and the
ballot being spread, the said Hobbs was declared elected. At a
subsequent meeting of the Lodge the D. D. G. M., in a written
order filed with the Lodge, set aside the action of the Lodge in
electing said Hobbs to membership, and being again balloted on, he
was rejected. The Lodge then, by unanimous vote, appealed from
the decision of the D. D. G. M., and the Noble Grand appointed a
committee of three brothers to make the appeal papers and " to
fully inform the Grand Master of all the particulars regarding the
ballot and action of the Lodge." Afterwards the committee re-
ported that the Grand Master had reversed the decision of the
D. D. G. M., and the committee was discharged. The D. D. G. M.
appeals, and a properly certified record is sent up. We are asked
to reverse the decision of the Grand Master. Your committee is
at a loss to know what to decide in this case, as the decision of
neither the D. D. or the Grand Master are given. We can not tell
what the controversy is about, nor who is 'right or wrong. The D.
D. G. M. sends a statement which accompanies the papers, showing
the grounds on which he acted, but the decision of the Grand Master
is nowhere given, and so we decide nothing on the merits of this
appeal. We only say that no D. D. G. M or Grand Master has
any power to set aside the action of a Subordinate Lodge on electing
a person to become a member.
We believe, however, it will be profitable to state in this connec-
tion what we believe to be the proper rule of practice in the
decisions made by District Deputies and appeals therefrom to the
Grand Master.
It ought to be remembered that it is not the province of the Dis-
trict Deputy or the Grand Master to pass upon questions of fact.
Their decisions must be upon questions of law only, excluding all
facts except such as may be necessary to present the question to be
decided. Any contest involving a decision on the facts ought not
be submitted to the Grand Master or District Deputy, nor ought he
be called on to make a decision in such a case.
Fairview Lodge, No. 134, November, 1892, p. 1514.
Ex parte Washington Lodge, No. 11, May, 1893, p. 1658.
Section 8, Chapter XV 111, General Laws.
On page 80 of General Laws, under the head of "Redistricting
the State," is the following provision:
"liesolved. That the D. D. G. M. shall be the medium of com-
munication between the Lodges and the Grand Master on all ques-
tions of law, usage and custom of the Order arising in the Lodges;
and it is hereby re-affirmed as the law of this Grand Body that the
2350 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
Grand Master will not be required to decide questions of law, usage
or custom of the Order arising in the Lodges, excepting on an
appeal from the D. D. G. M."
These quotations from the law and the above citation of authori-
ties plainly indicate that the District Depvity and the Grand Master
pass only on questions of law.
As we conceive it, the proper method in these cases is for the
District Deputy to make his statement and decision in writing,
clearly indicating the law on the point made. This should be
spread on the minutes of the Lodge in full. If the Lodge appeals
from the decision of the District Deputy to the Grand Master, the
only matter to go to the Grand Master is the statement of the Dis-
trict Deputy as recorded on the minutes, properly certified by the
Secretary of the Lodge. No other matters or statement of facts
should go to the Grand Master. When the Grand Master sends
his decision to the Subordinate Lodge, that must be spread of record
in full. If an appeal should then be taken from the decision of
the Grand Master to the Grand Lodge, a certified copy of the
decision of the District Deputy and, also, the decision of the Grand
Master, together with the grounds of appeal, would constitute the
record. In such a case no question of evidence could arise. No
committee is necessary to prepare the papers on appeal. No state-
ments, outside of what the, minutes of the Subordinate Lodge
ought to show, are permissible. It is purely a question of law, and
this is the only matter the District Deputy or the Grand Master
can properly decide. It is not proper tor the District Deputy or
the Grand Master to pass upon and decide controverted questions
of fact. (Washington Lodge, No. 11, supra.) We, therefore, offer
the following : Resolved, That the appeal herein be dismissed.
Enoch G. Houate,
Geo. Shirts,
J. B. Kimball,
J. B. Kenner,
John B. Cockrum.
no. 962. opinion by j. b. kimball, p. u. rep.
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. F., of Indiana:
Your Committee on Appeals to whom was referred a letter
which comes in the shape of a memorial of G. W. White, from the
action of Mitchell Lodge, No. 242. This letter shows that G. W.
White was expelled from his Lodge. He claims to have applied
to his Lodge for a copy of the transcript of his Lodge in this 'case,
and says his request has been refused. We have no answer from
the Lodge, consequently give no opinion in this case ; but we offer
the following :
Unsolved, That Mitchell Lodge, No. 242, be ordered to furnish to
G. W. White a full transcript in his case and also allow him an
appeal if desired, or show cause to this Grand Lodge why they do
not do so.
J. B. Kimball,
J. B. Kenner,
Enoch G. Hogate,
Geo Shirts,
John B. Co<jkrum.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2351
No. 939. OPINION BY .J. B. KENNER, P. G. M.
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. O. F., of Indiana :
J. T. McShane vs. Carmel Lodge, No. 401.
Your Committee on Grievances and Appeals, to whom was re-
ferred the appeal of Bro. J. T. McShane, from the action of Zions-
ville Lodge, No. 28.5, in expelling him from the Order, have had the
same under consideration.
We find, from an examination of the whole record, that this case,
together with the former trials and proceedings connected with it,
have been in the Lodges or Grand Lodge since the early part of
1892, and in order that the Grand Lodge may have the history of
this case, and the facts as shown by the record, we will briefly set
out the ifacts.
On the 21st of January, 1893, charges were filed in Carmel Lodge,
No. 401, which, in substance, charged Bro. McShane with seducing
the wife of a brother, John A. Haines. Bro. McShane was at that
time a prominent physician, and resided at Carmel, in Hamilton
county.
On or about the 7th of January, 1892, Dr. McShane was called
to the house of said John A. Haines. Bro. McShane went, thinking
he was called in a professional way. When he arrived he found
John A. Haines and his wife there and no one sick, but Haines
immediately charged him with seducing his wife. Dr, McShane
at once became very angry and used some very strong language,
and this language is the basis of the first charge in this case. Bro.
McShane denied the charge made by Haines.
After the charges were filed in the Lodge, for seduction, the
Secretary took a copy of them to Bro. McShane, to his office, and
delivered them to him in the presence of his wife, and a number
of the doctor's patients. This conduct of the Secretary, at the
place and under the circumstances, greatly angered Dr. McShane a
second time, and he again indulged in the strong and intemperate
language that is set out in the second charge in this case now on
trial. Bro. McShane used improper and violent language, but, after
cooling down, he wrote out and sent to his Lodge a full apology.
The charge first spoken of, which charged Bro. McShane with
seduction, came in for trial upon Carmel Lodge, and upon change
of venue, was sent to Broad Ripple Lodge, and upon this trial he
was found not guilty.
A civil suit was also brought in the Circuit Court, but Haines
abandoned that.
We now come to the case now before us.
This case was first tried upon two charges:
The first charge set up that Bro. McShane when called
to the house of John A. Haines, and charged by Haines
of seducing his ( Haine's ) wife, used grossly vulgar and
profane language in response to the charge made by
Haines. The second charge is that when the Secretary
delivered a copy of the charges to Bro. McShane, in the' presence
of his wife and several other persons not members of the Order, he
renounced and denounced the Lodge and the Order in violent.
2352 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
defamatory, profane and oftensive language, and put the copy in
the fire. These charges were preferred alter the original charges
of seduction had been tried, and not sustained.
A trial was had on these charges in Carniel Lodge, and the
brother was expelled. There was an appeal to the Grand Lodge,
and the action of the Lodge was reversed. (See Pro. of Grand
Lodge, November, 1892, page 1469.)
After the case was sent back to Carmel Lodge, a change of venue
was taken, and the case was sent to Sheridan Lodge for trial. A
trial was had, and the brother was again expelled. An appeal was
taken again to this Grand Lodge, and again it was reversed and
sent back. (See Pro. of Grand Lodge, May session, page 1882.)
The case was returned to Sheridan Lodge, and by that Lodge
returned to Carmel Lodge. The case slept there until the 28th
of November, 1894. This was eighteen months after the Grand
Lodge had reversed it the last time.
On the 28th of November, 1894, the case was sent by Carmel
Lodge to Zionsville, and a trial had.
Many errors have been argued against the action of Zionsville
Lodge in expelling Bro. McShane.
Your committee has carefully examined this record, and the
evidence and proceedings in the case, and have heard able and full
oral arguments in the case by attorneys on both sides.
The accused was notified when the case was sent to Zionsville
Lodge, to appear and defend the case, and he appeared and filed a
plea to the jurisdiction of Zionsville Lodge over this case or the ac-
cused, on the ground that the record in Zionsville Lodge in this
case does not show that any investigating committee was ever ap-
pointed, and did actually prefer charges against him in this case.
We have carefully examined the record and find no appoint-
ment of an examining committee, whose duty it was to prefer
charges. Therefore, so far as the record is concerned, none was
ever appointed, and this Grand Lodge has decided again and
again, under our present law, that unless charges are preterred by
an investigating committee, no brother can be put upon trial, and
unless the record shows this to have been done, Zionsville Lodge
had no jurisdiction of the case or the person of the accused. The
plea to the jurisdiction should have been therefore sustained, and
it was error to overrule it.
After the plea to the jurisdiction was filed, the accused asked
the right to sustain his plea by proof, and that the Trial Committee
rule on the plea, but the committee refused to do either, but held
the plea and compelled the accused to go to trial on the merits,
and made up their report and sent the question of the validity of
the plea to the jurisdiction, to the Lodge, along with the report on
the merits.
We think this was error.
A Trial Committee has full power to decide all questions arising
on the trial, and settle all preliminary motions and questions, be-
fore going to trial on the merits.
If the plea to the jurisdiction was a valid one, and could have
been sustained, then no trial was necessary and could not legally
be held.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2353
Many other errors are alleged, and some of them, we think, are
well taken, but inasmuch as we have taken the above views, your
committee will not discuss all of them.
We now desire to give our views upon the case on its general
features and the evidence.
It seems to your committee that the great persistency with
which this case has been pressed after several reversals savors some-
what of persecution.
After Bro. McShane was acquitted of the charge of seduction
by Broad Ripple Lodge, it would seem that the main charge was
settled, and the hot, intemperate language of the brother growing
out of this charge was only an incident of the main charge, and is
accounted for by reason of a brother Odd Fellow charging him
with a most serious and grave charge, of which he was innocent.
After Dr. McShane had been acquitted of the charge of
seduction in Broad Ripple Lodge, out of which the charge in this
case grew, and he had been practically acquitted of it in a civil
court and given the manly apology to his Lodge which he did for
his violent and angry language, it does seem that the principles of
Odd Fellowship ought to have extended to him the principles of
charity and brotherly love. But it seems that no apology or re-
pentance on his part haa any weight in this case.
We do not approve of the language used by the brother in any
respect; it was angry and very intemperate, and wholly improper.
But there are in this case, as this Grand Lodge has held similar
language in other cases, extenuating and palliating circuinstances
for strong and intemperate language. See Proceedings of Grand
Lodge of Indiana, November Session, 1890, page 756.
What would any brother probably do or say when another
brother called him to his house and in the presence of his wife
charged him with ruining that wife, such charge being wholly
false, and on trial found to be false. We submit that most men
would boil over, and one would be inclined to express himself
strongly.
Then, again, when the Secretary of the Lodge presented copies of
charges to the brother, in the presence of his wife and other per-
sons, who were his patients and friends, it seems that either by in-
tent or inadvertence it was intended to humiliate our brother in
the presence of his wife and friends, and it is not to be wondered
at that Dr. McShane became very much agitated, and for the mo-
ment lost control of himself, and used the very improper language
which was used, but after he recovered his usual frame of mind he
promptly and fully apologized to his Lodge.
We are fully of the opinion that, under these facts, it is excessive
punishment to expel a brother who had always before been a good
man, and has always been since.
The strong and intemperate language used by Brother
McShane, in the presence of the Secretary, was hot, vio-
lent and profane, and we must condemn it, but, under the circum-
stances surrounding it, and provoked it, that there were extenuating
and palliating circumstances, which after the apology did not war-
rant the extreme penalty of expulsion ; besides this, your committee
2354 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
does not regard that the evidence sustains the charge of renouncing
the Order.
The brother did speak rashly about his Lodge, but it could not
be construed to renounce the Order.
Brother McShane got the idea in his mind that the Lodge was
under the influence ot the Haines' and their friends' influence, and
that they were persecuting him, and this fact called out the strong
language by the brother against the Lodge.
That part of the charge which sets out that the brother burned
the copies of the charges given him by the Secretary, was an im-
proper charge.
We believe it was error not to strike out that part of the second
charge, and it was error to hear evidence on that subject, for the
reason that when copies of charges are given to a brother, they are
the brother's property, and for his information, and he can do what-
ever he pleases with them, and if he destroys them, it is no offense
againt the Order.
It appears in this whole transaction that Dr. McShane has always
borne the reputation of a good man, both before and since this
trouble, besides being eminent in his profession. This being the
case, should a case of mere contempt against his Lodge, for that is
all that we can make out of this charge, expel a brother from our
Order who has been an honored member for more than twenty
years ?
Your committee believe this case ought to be reversed, and inas-
much as Dr. McShane has been tried three times and compelled to
spend time and money to defend himself, and inasmuch as he
rendered a manly apology, we think this ought to be an end of
this case. We therefore offer the following :
Resolved, That the action of Zionsville Lodge, in expelling Bro.
J. T. McShane, be in all things reversed.
J. B. Kenner,
Enoch G. Hogate,
J. B. Kimball,
J. B. COCKRUM.
The various reports were then considered, and the fol-
lowing unanimously concurred in, without debate : Nos.
935, 936, 937, 938, 940, 941, 942, 943, 944, 945, 946, 948,
949, 951, 952, 953.
The next report. No. 955, Indianapolis Lodge, No. 465
vs. George W. Bone, was then read and considered. The
question of concurrence was discussed by Bros. Bartley,
Percifield, Shideler, Kenner, Cockrum and others.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA 2355
J. M. Bartley, P. G., then moved to refer the report
back to the committee, with instructions to reverse the
action of the Past Grands' committee and sustain the ac-
tion of the Lodge.
Discussion ensued on the motion to refer back, and a
vote was taken, which decided in the negative.
The report of the Committee on Grievances and Ap-
peals was then concurred in.
Reports Nos. 956, 957, 958, 960, 947 were then con-
sidered and concurred in.
Report No. 950, L. H. Willis vs. Sullivan Lodge, No.
147, was taken up and made the special order for 1:30
o'clock, this afternoon.
W. H. DeWolf, P. G. Rep., from the Committee on the
State of the Order submitted the following
R E P (.) R 'r :
To the Grand Lodge, T. O. 0. F., of Indiana:
Your Committee on the State of tlie Order, to which was referred
so much of the Grand Master's report as relates to the Orphans'
Home established at South Bend, beg leave to report that we have
given the subject careful consideration, and from the documents
submitted to us we believe the Home is a most worthy institution,
and commends itself strong^ly to the minds and hearts of all Odd
Fellows in this jurisdiction. It appears, however, to have been
organized and incorporated as a merely local Home, without the
sanction of this Grand Lodge, and therefore can have no legal claim
against this body. And in the present condition of our treasury
your committee can not see its way clear to recommend the Lodge
to make an appropriation to aid the Home at this time, however
much we might desire to do so under different conditions. Besides,
the Lodges to whom the parents of the orphans now at the Home
belonged are under legal obligations to maintain them. We are
also informed that the organization of the "Odd Fellows' Home"
contemplates the support of the orphans of the Order as well as of
old and disabled and indigent members, and as it is expected that
this Home will be in operation within a few months, we ofier the
following resolution:
Resolved, That it is inexpedient for this Grand Lodge to make an
appropriation from its treasury to aid the Orphans' Home at South
Bend.
Which, on motion, was concurred in.
2856 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
On raotion of W. H. Leedy, P. G. Rep., the Grand
Lodge adjourned until 1:30 p. m.
May 22, 1895, 1:30 p. m.
The Grand Lodge re-assembled, pursuant to adjourn-
ment, at 1:30 p. M., Grand Master M. A. Chipman in the
chair. The roll of Grand Officers was called and were
noted present, same as at the morning session.
On motion, the reading of the minutes of the morning
session was dispensed with.
J. E. C. F. Harper, P. G. Rep., submitted the follow-
ing resolution :
Resolved, That annotation No. 42, under Sec. 4, Chap. IV, Gen-
eral Laws, be stricken out, and in lieu thereof the following be in-
serted :
42. If a brother has been sick thirteen weeks at the time a by-
law is adopted reducing the benefits after thirteen weeks, or if he
has been pick one year at the time the Lodge adopts a byrlaw re-
ducing the benefits after one year's consecutive sickness, the reduc-
tion applies to such brother immediately, from and after the pas-
sage of the by-law. See proceedings G. L. of Indiana, November,
1888, pages 8U and 81; White's Digest, Sees. 27 and 28; also decision
of Grand Master, November, 1891, page 1055.
Which was laid over under the rules.
The special order for ]:30 p. m., the further considera-
tion of the report of the Committee on Grievances and
Appeals, viz., No. 950, L. H. Willis vs. Sullivan Lodge,
No. 147, was taken up. The report was read by Geo.
Shirts, P. G.
John S. Bay^, P. G. , moved the following resolution :
Resolved, That the report of the Committee on Grievances and
Appeals, in the case of the appeal of L. H. Willis from Sullivan
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA 2357
Lodge, No. 147, I. O. 0. F., be not received, and that the case be
referred back to said committee, and that they be instructed to
sustain the action of said Sullivan Lodge and aflfirm their said find-
ing in said case.
The question of adoption of the resolution was discussed
by Bros. Bays, Shirts, Shideler, Cockrum and Leach. A
vote was then taken and the resolution was declared lost.
The report of the committee was then concurred in.
The following reports from the same committee were
concurred in without discussion : Nos. 959, 954, 961.
J. B. Kimball, P. G. Rep , from same committee, called
up the report in the case of the memorial of G. W. Wtiite
from the action of Mitchell Lodge, No. 242 (found on
page 2350, printed proceedings), and on motion the resolu-
tion submitted by the committee was concurred in.
Report No. 989, J. T. McShane vs. Carmel Lodge, No.
401, was taken up and considered, and after discussion by
Bros. Grant, Shirts, Patty and Cockrum, Bro. Patty
submitted the following resolution :
Resolved, That this case be referred back to the committee, with
instructions to sustain the action of Zionsville Lodge, No. 285, I. 0.
O. F., in expelling Bro. J. T. McShane.
A standing vote was taken on the adoption of the reso-
lution, which was decided in the affirmative by a large
majority.
The following telegram was directed to be sent to the
Grand Lodge, I. O. O. F., in session at Canton, Ohio, in
response to a telegram of fraternal greetings :
Indianapolis, Ind., May 22, 1895.
Grand Master Grand Lodge, I. O. O. F., Canton, 0.:
The Grand Lodge, I. 0. O. F., of Indiana, now in session, on
behalf of forty-two thousand Odd Fellows of the State, send
greetings to the Grand Lodge, I. O. O. F., of Ohio, and bid you God
speed in the grand principles of our Order.
B. F. Foster, M. A. Chipman,
Grand Secretary. Grand Master.
2358 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
J. W. Tingle, P. G., from the Committee on Petitions
and Applications, submitted the following
•REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. O. F., of Indiana :
Your Committee on Petitions and Applications to whom was re-
ferred that part of the Grand Master's report relating to the insti-
tuting of Frankton Lodge, No. 711; Martinsburg Lodge, No. 712,
and Twelve Mile Lodge, No. 713, by dispensation, would respect-
fully report that we have had the same under consideration, and
find that a full compliance with all laws and rulings in such cases
has been faithfully carried out, and we recommend that charters be
granted to the Lodges above specified.
Which on motion was concurred in.
J. W. Tingle, P. G., from the same committee, sub-
mitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand IMc/e, I. O. O. F., of Indiana :
Your committee to whom was referred the petition of Manches-
ter Lodge, No. 613, asking permission to solicit aid from the in-
dividual membership of our Order, to assist them in building a
hall — they being entirely without any place of meeting — report
that we have had the same under consideration, and find that
Manchester Lodge has been for some time subject to some sickness
among its members; we further find that this Lodge has not been
extravagant in building their Lodge Hall, but have built as econo-
mically as could well be done ; we, therefore, recommend that Man-
chester Lodge, No. 613, be granted permission to appeal to the in-
dividual members of this jurisdiction for assistance.
Which was concurred in.
J. W. Tingle, P. G., from the same committee sub-
mitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. O. F, of Indiana :
Your Committee on Petitions and Applications to whom was re-
ferred the petition of Monroeville Lodge, No. 283, praying that the
sentence of suspension against Bro. R. E. Elliott be set aside and
that he be restored to full membership in good standing, would re-
spectfully report that we have had the same under^onsideration
and find that this committee is not in possession of sufficient infor-
mation upon which to base a report, the Lodge neglecting to state
the charges, the time of the investigation of the same or the length
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2359
of time for which Bro. Elliott was suspended. We therefore recom-
mend that Monroeville Lodge be instructed to furnish the informa-
tion above cited to this Grand Lodge at the November, 1895,
Which was concurred iu.
L. R. Cowles, P. G., from the same committee, sub-
mitted the following
REP (.) K T ;
To the (J rand Lodge, I. O. O. F., </ Indian,, :
We, your Committee on Petitions and Applications, to whom
was referred the petitions of the following named Lodges asking
permission to re-instate the following named expelled members :
Lawrence Lodge, No. 375, to re-instate David Richardson ;
Cecelia Lodge, No. 166, to re-instate H. E. Massa ;
Tipton Lodge, No. 220, to re-instate J. H. Coppock ;
New Ross Lodge, No. 397, to re-instate James M. Smith;
Eureka Lodge, No. 142, to re-instate D. L. Allen and Qeo. W.
Gilbert ;
Deerfield Lodge, No. 293, to re-instate Samuel McGiff ;
Osceola Lodge, No. 173, to re-instate C. L. Coolman;
Shannondale Lodge, No. 187, to re-instate J. H. Goldsborough;
Have examined the papers in those petitions and, finding the law
has been in all things complied with, would recommend they be
granted.
Which, on motion, was concurred in.
R. E. Slater, P. G., from the same committee, submit-
ted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, L O. O. F., of Indiana :
We, the committee to whom was referred the petitions request-
ing your honorable body for re-issue of their charters of Scipio
Lodge, No. 509, and Bee Lodge, No. 572, whose charters were
destroyed by fire, do heartily recommend that their requests be
granted, and also recommend that the Grand Lodge furnish said
Lodges with rituals free.
Which on motion was concurred in.
2360 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
R. E. Slater, P. G., from thesara« committee, submitted
the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. O. F., of Indiana :
We, your Committee on Petitions and Applications, to whom was
referred the petition of Kossuth Lodge, No. 81, asking the priv-
ilege of soliciting aid from their sister Lodges to aid them in
building a new hall, would respectfully report, after having exam-
ined the case, that we do not think it well to grant such request,
and recommend that it be not granted.
Which was concurred in.
C. B. Stewart, P. G., from the same committee, sub
mitted the following
R E P () R 'J' :
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. O. F., of Indiana:
Your Committee on Petitions and Applications, to whom was re-
ferred the petitition of VanBuren Lodge, No. 633, asking to re-
instate John Barnes, suspended six months for drunkenness, would
respectfully report that as six months for drunkenness is a very
light sentence, we recommend that the petition be not granted.
Which was concurred in.
C. B. Stewart, P. G., from the same committee, sub-
mitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, I O. O. F, of Indiana .
Your Committee on Petitions and Applications, to whom was re-
ferred the petition of Pleasantville Lodge, No. 408, praying that
consent of this Grand Lodge be given for the re-instation of George
Martin, would report that we have had the same under considera-
tion, and find that Pleasantville Lodge has neglected to furnish any
information by which a report may be made. We therefore recom-
mend that the petition be returned to Pleasantville Lodge, No. 408,
for the full record in the case, and we further recommend that in
all cases where such leniency of this Grand Lodge is asked for, that
they be required to furnish a full transcript of the trial and convic-
tion, to the end that your committee may act intelligently.
Which was concurred in.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2361
Will Hass, p. G., from the same committee, submitted
the following
R E P U R T :
To i],e Grand Ijodye, J. O. O. F., of Indiana :
Your Committee on Petitions and Applications, to whom was re-
ferred the petition of Carpentersville Lodge, No. H5, asking for
permission to remove from Carpentersville to Roachdale, taking the
name of Roachdale, but retaining their number (115), have exam-
ined their request, and would respectfully report that it would be,
in our opinion, for the good of the Lodge to make such removal,
and we recommend that their petition be granted, and a duplicate
charter be granted them in place of the one destroyed by fire.
Which was concurred in.
R. E. Slater, P. G., from the same committee, submitted
the following
REPORT:
To the Grand lodge, I. O. (). F., of Indiana:
Your Committee on Petitions and Applications, to whom was re-
ferred the petition of Setting Sun Lodge, No. 583, unanimously
asking permission to remove their Lodge from Eugene to Cayuga,
have carefully examined the same, and believing it would benefit
said Lodge, would recommend that their petition be granted.
Which was concurred in.
L. R. Cowles, P. G., from the same committee, sub-
mitted the following
R E P O R T :
To the Grand Lodye, I. O. 0. F., of Indian: :
We, your committee to whom was referred the petition of
Liberty Lodge, No. 710, asking for a charter in lieu of dispensation
granted by the Grand Master, would respectfully report that we
have carefully examined into this case, and would recommend their
petition be granted.
A lengthy discussion ensued pro and con, on the adop-
tion of this report. A standing vote was finally taken
which resulted in 201 in the affirmative and 197 in the
negative, as announced by the Acting Grand Master, C.
F. Northern.
2362 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
J. W. Tingle, P. G. , from the same committee, submitted
the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. O. F., of Indiana :
Your Committee on Petitions and Applications, to whom was
referred the petition of Hardinsburg Lodge, No. 501, asking per-
mission of the Grand Body to solicit aid from the sister Lodges to
assist in building a Lodge hall, report that we have had the same
under consideration and find the said Lodge has sustained a loss
by fire of their Lodge property. We find that they were insured
for $1,180. We further find by the report of the Secretary of
Hardinsburg Lodge to the Grand Secretary June 30, 1894, the re-
sources of said Hardinsburg Lodge was 13,333.56, which would in-
dicate that this Lodge is in a very healthy condition financially,
and we are of the opinion that they are amply able to take care of
themselves. Therefore, we recommend that the petition be not
granted.
Which was concurred in.
At this point in the proceedings a motion was made to
appeal from the decision of the Acting Grand Master in
deciding the vote on the report of the Committee on Peti-
tions and Applications in granting a charter to Liberty
Lodge, No. 710, in lieu of the dispensation granted by the
Grand Master, and referring the question to a vote by
Lodges. A point of order was raised by J. B. Cockrum
that it was too late. The Acting Grand Master stated
that he would decide the question on point of order to-
morrow morning.
J. W. Henderson, P. G. , from the Legislative Commit-
tee, submitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, T. 0. O. F., of Indiana :
Your Committee on Legislation, to whom was referred the ques-
tion presented by Edwards Lodge, No. 178, I. 0. 0. F., would
respectfully report that in our judgment, in a case where a widow
of a deceased brother of a Lodge dies leaving no children or
dependent relatives, or relatives on whom she is dependent, and
also leaving an estate sufficient to pay her funeral expenses, that
no person is entitled to said benefits, but that the same should
remain in the Lodge treasury.
Which was laid over until to-morrow.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2363
The following amendment was submitted by J. F. Mann,
from the Legislative Committee, without reading :
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. O. F., of Indiana :
We hereby offer the following as an amendment to Section 2,
Article II, of the Constitution, viz.:
Sec. 2. The Grand Lodge shall hold one Communication in each
year commencing on the first Wednesday after the third Tuesday
in November. The Grand Lodge may adjourn from day to day,
until the business of the session is disposed of All meetings of
the Grand Lodge shall be held in the city of Indianapolis.
Provided, That commencing with the year 1899, there shall be
two regular Communications in each year, commencing on the first
Wednesday after the third Tuesday in May and November. The
May session to be designated as the Semi-Annual Communication
and the November session as the Annual Communication.
Laid over until to-morrow, and referred to the Legisla-
tive Committee.
O. H. Bogue, P. G., submitted the following amend-
ment to the General Laws without reading:
1 hereby submit and ask the adoption of proposed amendment
to General Laws :
CHAPTER IV.
" Section 4. Each member who shall have attained the three
degrees of a Subordinate Lodge, and having been for not less than
six months a contributing member in full fellowship, and who is
not under any of the restrictions set forth in the General Laws,
shall be entitled, should he become sick or otherwise disabled, and
thereby unable to earn a livelihood, to a sum not less than three
dollars per week out of the funds of the Lodge, and in like manner
to the sum of two dollars per week should he have attained the
second degree, and to the sum of one dollar per week should he
have attained only the first degree : Provided, however, That
such sickness or disability shall not have been caused by in-
temperance or debauchery, or by any immoral conduct or practice,
and which allowance and payment shall commence with the ■second
week of such sickness or disability, and continue so long as there is
so much money in the Lodge treasury, or until such sickness or dis-
ability shall have been removed, not exceeding, however, in any
case, the period of fifty-two weeks from any one sickness or disabil-
ity, or any amount of sickness or disability arising from the same
proximate cause, and no benefits shall be paid for the first week's
sickness or disability.
"Subordinate Lodges may provide by written by-laws for the
payment of larger sums on account of sick benefits than above
specified: Provided, That in each such cases funds shall be provided
2364 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
for such increased payments by increasing the amounts to be paid
in by members as dues and in the following sums and manner,
and in no other way, to-wit :
"When dues are $5.20 per annum, sick benefits shall be $3 per
week ; when dues are $6 per annum, sick benefits shall $4 per week;
when dues are $6.60 per annum, sick benefits shall be $5 per week ;
when dues are $7.20 per annum, sick benefits shall be |6 per week ;
and for each additional seventy cents per annum collected as
dues, an additional sum of $1 per week shall be paid as sick bene-
fits, and in no other way or ratio shall sick benefits be regulated or
paid, except in the manner and ratio herein stipulated."
Laid over until to-morrow.
Oq motion, the Grand Lodge adjourned until 9 A. M.
to-morrow.
Indianapolis, May 23, 1895,
9 o'clock a. m.
The Grand Lodge met pursuant to adjournment at 9
o'clock A. M., Grand Master M, A. Chipman presiding.
The Grand Secretary reported a quorum present.
After singing the opening ode, and prayer by the Grand
Chaplain, the Deputy Grand Master, by order of the Grand
Master, declared the Grand Lodge duly opened for the
transaction of business.
The roll of Grand Officers was called and were found
present as follows : '
M. A. Chipman, Grand Master.
C. F. Northern, Deputy Grand Master.
G. L. Eeinhard, Grand Warden.
B. F. Foster, Grand Secretary.
Jas. a. Wildman, Grand Treasurer.
U. Z. Wiley, G. Rep. S. G. L., I. 0. 0. F.
Enoch G. Hogate, G. Rep. S. G. L„ I. 0. O. F.
A. J. RuTLEDGE, Grand Marshal.
Geo. W. Sowerwine, Grand Conductor.
Oscar Hadley, Grand Guardian.
Fred Kimbley, Grand Herald.
W. ll. Leedy, Grand Instructor.
A. J. Carey, Grand Chaplain, pro tern.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2365
On motion of D. B. Shideler, P. G. Rep., the reading of
the Minutes of yesterday's session was dispensed with,
the same having been printed and circulated.
J. J. Tingle, P. G., from the Committee on Credentials,
submitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, I. (). O. F., of Tndiana :
Your committee to whom was referred the credentials of certain
Past Grands and Representatives, have examined the same, and
finding them correct, would recommend their admission.
Which was concurred in.
J. W. Tingle, P. G., submitted the following resolution :
Resolved, That in the discussion of any question presented to-day
in this Grand Lodge, speeches shall be limited to five (5) minutes.
Which was concurred in.
J. B. Kenner, P. G. Rep , from the Committee on
Grievances and Appeals, called up the report No. 939,
made by that committee on yesterday, in case of J. T.
McShane vs. Carmel Lodge, No. 401, and in accordance
with instructions submitted the following :
No. 939. OPINION BY J. B. KENNER, P. G. M.
To the Grand Ijodge, I. 0. 0. F., of Indiana :
J. T. McShane vs. Carmel Lodge, No. 40L
Your Committee on Grievances and Appeals, to whom was re-
ferred the appeal of Bro. J. T. McShane, from the action of Zions-
ville Lodge, No. 285, in expelling him from the Order, have had the
same under consideration.
We find, from an examination of the. whole record, that this case,
together with the former trials and proceedings connected with it,
have been in the Lodges or Grand Lodge since the early part of
1 892, and in order that the Grand Lodge may have the history of
this case, and the facts as shown by the record, we will briefly set
out the facts.
On the 21st of January, 1893, charges were filed in Carmel Lodge,
No. 401, which, in substance, ciaarged Bro. McShane with seducing
2366 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
the wife of a brother, John A. Haines. Bro. McShane was at that
time a prominent physician, and resided at Carmel, in Hamilton
county.
On or about the 7th of January, 1892, Dr. McShane was called
to the house of said John A. Haines. Bro. McShane went, thinking
he was called in a j^rofessional way. When he arrived he found
John A. Haines and his wife there and no one sick, but Haines
immediately charged him with seducing his wife. Dr, McShane
at once became very angry and used some very strong language,
and this language is the basis of the first charge in this case. Bro.
McShane denied the charge made by Haines.
After the charges were filed in the Lodge, for seduction, the
Secretary took a copy of them to Bro. McShane, to his office, and
delivered them to him in the presence of his wife, and a number
of the doctor's patients. This conduct of the Secretary, at the
place and under the circumstances, greatly angered Dr. McShane a
second time, and he again indulged in the strong and intemperate
language that is set out in the second charge in this case now on
trial. Bro. McShane used improper and violent language, but, after
cooling down, he wrote out and sent to his Lodge a full apology.
The charge first spoken of, which charged Bro. McShane with
seduction, came in for trial upon Carmel Lodge, and upon change
of venue, was sent to Broad Ripple Lodge, and upon this trial he
was found not guilty.
A civil suit was also brought in the Circuit Court, but Haines
abandoned that.
We now come to the case before us.
This case was first tried upon two charges ;
The first charge set up that Bro. McShane when called
to the house of John A. Haines, and charged by Haines
of seducing his ( Haines' ) wife, used grossly vulgar and
profane language in response to the charge made by
Haines. The second charge is that 'when the Secretary
delivered a copy of the charges to Bro. McShane, in the presence
of his wife and several other persons not members of the Order, he
renounced and denounced the Lodge and the Order in violent,
defamatory, profane and ofiensive language, and put the copy in
the fire. These charges were preferred after the original charges
of seduction had been tried, and not sustained.
A trial was had on these charges in Carmel Lodge, and the
brother was expelled. There was an appeal to the Grand Lodge,
and the action of the Lodge was reversed. (See Pro. of Grand
Lodge, November, 1892, page 1469.)
After the case was sent back to Carmel Lodge, a change of venue
was taken, and the case was sent to Sheridan Lodge for trial. A
trial was had, and the brother was again expelled. An appeal was
taken again to this Grand Lodge, and again it was reversed and
sent back. (See Pro. of Grand Lodge, May session, page 1882.)
The case was returned to Sheridan Lodge, and by that Lodge
returned to Carmel Lodge. The case slept there until the 28th
of November, 1894. This was eighteen months after the Grand
Lodge had reversed it the last time.
On the 28th of November, 1894, the case was sent by Carmel
Lodge to Zionsville, and a trial had.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2367
Many errors have been argued against the action of Zionsville
Lodge in expelling Bro. McShane.
Your committee has carefully examined this record, and the
evidence and proceedings in the case, and have heard able and full
oral arguments in the case by attorneys on both sides.
The accused was notified when the case was sent to Zionsville
Lodge, to appear and defend the case, and he appeared and filed a
plea to the jurisdiction of Zionsville Lodge over this case or the ac-
cused, on the ground that the record in Zionsville Lodge in this
case does not show that any investigating committee was ever ap-
pointed, and did actually prefer charges against him in this case.
We have carefully examined the record and find no appoint-
ment of an examining committee, whose duty it was to prefer
charges. Therefore, so far as the record is concerned, none was
ever appointed, and this Grand Lodge has decided again and
again, under our present law, that unless charges are preferred by
an investigating committee, no brother can be put upon trial, and
unless the record shows this to have been done, Zionsville Lodge
had no jurisdiction of the case or the person of the accused. The
plea to the jurisdiction should have been therefore sustained, and
it was error to overrule it.
After the plea to the jurisdiction was filed, the accused asked
the right to sustain his plea by proof, and that the Trial Committee
rule on the plea, but the committee refused to do either, but held
the plea and compelled the accused to go to trial on the merits,
and made up their report and sent the question of the validity of
the plea to the jurisdiction, to the Lodge, along with the report on
the merits.
We think this was error.
A Trial Committee has full power to decide all questions arising
on the trial, and settle all preliminary motions and questions, be-
fore going to trial on the merits.
If the plea to the jurisdiction was a valid 'one, and could have
been sustained, then no trial was necessary and could not legally
be held.
Many other errors are alleged, and some of them, we think, are
well taken, but inasmuch as we have taken the above views, your
committee will not discuss all of them.
We now desire to give our views upon the case on its general
featurs and the evidence.
It seems to your committee that the great persistency with which
this case has been pressed after several reversals savors somewhat
of persecution.
After Bro. McShane was acquitted of the charge of seduction by
Broad Ripple Lodge, it would seem that the main charge was set
tied, and the hot, intemperate language of the brother growing out
of this charge was only an incident of the main charge, and is ac-
counted for by reason of a brother Odd Fellow charging him with a
most serious and grave charge, of which he was innocent.
After Dr. McShane had been acquitted of the charge of seduc-
tion in Broad Ripple Lodge, out of which the charge in this case
grew, and he had been practically acquitted of it in a civil court and
given the manly apology to his Lodge which he did for his violent
and angry language, it does seem that the principles of Odd Fellow-
2368 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
ship ought to have extended to him the principles of charity and
brotherly love. But it seems that no apology or repentance on his
part had any v^eight in this case.
We do not approve of the language used by the brother in any
respect; it was angry and very intemperate, and wholly improper.
But there are in this case, as this Grand Lodge has held similar lan-
guage in other cases, extenuating and palliating circumstances for
strong and intemperate language. See proceedings of Grand Lodge
of Indiana, November session, 1890, page 756.
What would any brother probably do or say when another
brother called him to his house and in the presence of his wife
charged him with ruining that wife, such charge being wholly false,
and on trial found to be false. We submit that most men would
boil over, and one would be inclined to express himself stongly.
Then, again, when the Secretary of the Lodge presented copies
of charges to the brother, in the presence of his wife and other per-
sons, who were his patients and friends, it seems that either by in-
tent or inadvertance it was intended to humiliate our brother in
the presence of his wile and friends, and it is not to be wondered
at that Dr. McShane became very much agitated, and for the mo-
ment lost control of himself, and used the very improper language
which was used, but after he recovered Lis usual frame of mind he
promptly and fully apologized to his Lodge.
We are fully of the opinion that, under these facts, it is excessive
punishment to expel a brother who had always before been a good
man, and has always been since.
The strong and intemperate language used by Brother McShane,
in the presence of the Secretary, was hot, violent and profane, aud
we must condemn it, but, under the circumstances surrounding it,
and provoked it, that there were extenuating and palliating cir-
cumstances, which after the apology did not warrant the extreme
penalty of expulsion ; besides this, your committee does not regard
that the evidence sustains the charge of renouncing the Order.
The brother did speak rashly about his Lodge, but it could not
be construed to renounce the Order.
Brother McShane got the idea in his mind that the Lodge was
under the influence of Haines and their friends' influence, and that
they were persecuting him, and this fact called out the strong lan-
guage by the brother against the Lodge.
That part of the charge which sets out that the brother burned
the copies of the charges given him by the Secretary, was an im-
proper charge.
We believe it was error not to strike out that part of the second
charge, and it was error to hear evidence on that subject, for the
reason that when copies of charges are given to a brother, they are
the brother's property, and for his information, and he can do what-
ever he pleases with them, and if he destroys them, it is no offense
against the Order.
It appears in this whole transaction that Dr. McShane has always
borne the reputation of a good man, both before and since this
trouble, besides being eminent in his profession. This being the
case, should a case of mere contempt against his Lodge, for that is
all that we can make out of this charge, expel a brother from our
Order, who has been an honored member for more than twenty
years ?
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2369
Your committee believe tliis case ought to be reversed, and inas-
much as Dr. McShane has been tried three times and compelled to
spend time and money to defend himself, and inasmuch as he ren-
dered a manly apology, we think this ought to be an end of this
case. We therefore offer the following :
Resolved, That the action of Zionsville Lodge, in expelling Bro.
J. T. McShane, be in all things reversed.
J. B. Kenner,
Enoch G. Hogate,
J. B. Kimball,
J. B. COCKRUM.
By instructions of the Grand Lodge the action of Zionsville Lodge
in expelling Bro. J. T. McShane is affirmed.
J. B. Kenner.
Which was concurred in.
Deputy Grand Master C. F. Northt rn in deciding the
question on point of order in the appeal taken from his
decision adopting the report of the Committee on Petitions
and Applications, granting a charter to Liberty Lodge,
No. 710, in lieu of dispensation, stated that as there was
some question as to the correctness of the vote taken yester-
day another vote might be taken by unanimous consent,
which was agreed to. Another vote was taken with fol-
lowing result: Affirmative, 418; negative not counted.
Pending further consideration, on motion ofD. B. Shideler,
the report was concurred in by unanimous vote.
The following appeal was submitted :*
Notice is hereby given that I appeal to the Sovereign Grand
Lodge, I. 0. 0. F., from the action of the Grand Lodge of Indiana
in the case of John T. McShane vs. Carmel Lodge, No. 401, at the
May session of said Grand Lodge of Indiana.
John T. McShane.
Appeal granted.
S. P. Stroup, P. G. Rep., from the Committee on the
State of the Order, submitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. O. K, of Indiana:
Your Committee on the State of the Order, to which was referred
so much of the report of the Grand Master as relates to the privi-
2370 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
lege granted to the Grand Jurisdiction of North Dakota to solicit
aid in our jurisdiction, would report that we have examined all the
papers coming into our hands in connection with such subject, and
find that the Grand Jurisdiction of Indiana contributed the sum of
$971.51, for which the Grand Lodge of North Dakota commends
this Grand Jurisdiction for its liberality.
Which was concurred in.
J. E. C. F. Harper, P. G. Rep., from the same com-
mittee, submitted the following :
REPORT:
To the Gram! Lodge, I. O. O. F., of Indiana :
Your Committee oij the State of the Order, to which was refer-
red so much of the Grand Master's report as relates to the Odd
Fellows' Home, have duly considered the same, and respectfully
report the following resolution:
Resolved, That the Trustees of this Grand Lodge be instructed to
pay to the Odd Fellows' Home the amount now due them from the
Grand Lodge, in such sums as may from time to time be necessary,
and raise the same by loan or otherwise.
Which was concurred in.
J. E. C. F. Harper, P. G. Rep., from the same com-
mittee, submitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, I: 0. O. F., of Indiana :
Your Committee on the State of the Order has had under con-
sideration the following statement from Richmond Lodge, No. 254 :
" To the Grand Lodge of Indiana, I. 0. 0. F.:
" Richmond Lodge, No. 254, desires to submit the following
statement:
"On the 22nd of October, 1894, the application for membership
by card of Thomas F. Swain was received in this Lodge. On the
evening of the 29th of the same month the Committee of Investi-
gation reported favorable. The Secretary was then instructed to
ask Chinkaroror Lodge, No. 120, for a dispensation to admit him
(he living nearer their Lodge than ours), Bro. Swain having taken
his card from Webster Lodge, No. 371. (The accompanying dia-
gram will illustrate the location of all the Lodges interested.) On
November 3rd, 1894, Chinkaroror Lodge, by resolution, refused to
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2371
grant such dispensation. (See paper marked ' A,' and herewith
enclosed.) On the 12th of the same month Richmond Lodge
instructed the Secretary to ask a reason for such refusal.
(See paper marked 'B'.) Then, again, on the 17th of the same
month, Chinkaroror Lodge refused to recede from its former action,
and also refused to give any reason therefor. (See paper marked
'C'.) Now, therefore, Richmond Lodge petitions this Grand Body
and prays that this Grand Lodge cause Chinkaroror Lodge, No. 120,
to assign a reason for such refusal or prefer charges against Bro. P.
O. Swain for annulment of card. (Signed C. R. Tingle, N. G., A. K.
Deets, Sec'y, with the seal of Richmond Lodge, No. 254, attached)."
Your committee finds upon examination of the correspondence
between the two Lodges that the above statement is substantially
correct.
The correspondence does not show, however, that the proceed-
ings in the matter have been in accordance with Section 10, Chap-
ter II, General Laws, on page 22 of July edition, 1894. A refer-
ence to that section will show that the whole matter is under con-
trol of the Grand Master, and from his decision there can be no
appeal.
Your committee therefore asks to be discharged from the further
-consideration of the subject.
Which was concurred in.
Representatives Wm. Lockhart, of No. 64, and J. H.
<joldsmith, of No. 7, submitted the following :
Amend Section 2, Article II, of the Constitution as follows : After
the word "Indianapolis" insert — ''Provided, however, That the
Semi-annual Communication of May, 1896, be dispensed with. "
Which was laid over until next session and referred to
the Legislative Committee.
L. J. Monks, P. G., from the Legislative Committee, sub-
mitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. O. F., of Indiana :
Your Committee on Legislation, to whom was referred the de-
cisions of the Grand Master, to-wit :
"Is a Past Grand of an old Lodge, who has never served as Vice
Grand, eligible as Representative in this body ?
" Under Section 3, Article I, of the Constitution of this Grand
Lodge it is expressly provided that he is not, while in Section 1,
Chapter XIX, General Laws, the only qualification required is that
he shall be a Past Grand.
2372 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
" At the May session, 1887, page 1182, the question was presented
to the Legislative Committee of this body as to whether a Noble
Grand who had not filled the oflBce of Vice Grand would be eligible
as Representative. The committee, citing Section 5, Chapter III, of
the General Laws, held that he would be, but the section of the
Constitution above cited was not referred to in the decision, and
believing the provision of the Constitution and the section of the
General Laws are in conflict, that the Constitution would control, I
held the Noble Grand under such circumstances would not be eli-
gible as Representative, and submit it to you for your approval or
disapproval " — have had the same under consideration, and recom-
mend that the same be approved.
Which was concurred in.
L. J. Monks, P. G., from the same committee, submitted
the following resoution :
Your Committee on Legislation recommend the adoption of the
following resolution :
Resolved, That Section 3, of Article I of the Constitution, be
amended to read as follows :
Sec. 3. No person shall be eligible to a seat in this Grand Lodge
unless he shall have served regularly as a V. G and N. G. at least
one legal term in some Subordinate Lodge (except only in the case
of the first N. G. and the first V. G. of a new Lodge), and in the
case provided for in Section 5 of Chapter IlT of the General Laws.
And these qualifications shall be, in all cases, certified io by the N.
G. and Secretary of all Lodges concerned, and sealed with the seal
of the same, before the Grand Lodge Degree shall be conferred upon
any applicant for membership or Representative elect."
Laid over until next session under the rules.
The hour for the Special Order, viz., the exemplification
of the secret work, having arrived, W.' H. Leedy, Grand
Instructor, assisted by J. B, Kenner, P. G. Rep., gave the
instruction therein.
The second Special Order, the Nomination of Grand
Officers, was then taken up and the following nominations
were made :
For Grand Master :
C. F. Northern, of No. 103.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2373
For Deputy Grand Master :
Geo. L. Reinhard, of No. 140.
For Grand Warden :
L. J. Monks, of No. 121.
R. P. Davis, of No. 181.
0. H. Bogue, of No. 46.
W. M. Coval, of No. 44.
H. L. Williamson, of No. 14.
M. H. Chappell, of No. 99.
Jno. T. Lowe, of No. 32.
W. S. Jacobs, of No. 92
Geo. A. Sinex, of No. 1.
.Anderson Percival, of No. 670.
Jno. E. Edmondson, of No. 166.
Michael Keefe, of No. 472.
L. R. Cowles, of No. 658.
J. D. Adair, of No. 158.
Edwin Farrer, of No. 35.
H. B. Stark, of No. 420.
R. H. Washburn, of No. 486.
E. S. Nichols, of No. 437.
R. E. Slater, of No. 8.
Wm Solenberg, of No. 876.
Chas. H. Clark, of No. 60.
U. H. Hon, of No. 130.
James H. Lewis, of No. 20.
A. C. Soller, of No. . ■
E. Stewart, of No. 417.
F. H. Austin, of No. 277.
H. Jones, of No. 677.
E. C. Boyse, of No. 140.
Jno T. Leach, of No. 19.
J. Conklin, of No. 164. •
A. E. Johnson, of No. 155.
H. G. Thayer, of No. 91.
For Grand Secretary :
B. F. Foster, of No. 11.
For Grand Treasurer :
J. A. Wildman, of No. 44.
For Representative to Sovereign Grand Lodge, I.
O. O. F. :
M. A. Chipman, of No. 131.
For Trustee Grand Lodge :
Jno. F. Wallick, of No. 124.
2374 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
D. B. Shideler, P. G. Rep., submitted the following
resolution :
Resolved, That the Grand Treasurer be allowed a compensation of
$150 per term for services as such Grand Treasurer,
Which was adopted unanimously.
T. W. Hutchison, P. G., from the Legislative Com-
mittee, submitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, T. 0. O. F., of Indiana :
Your Committee on Legislation, to whom was referred the ques-
tion presented by Edwards Lodge, No. 178, I. 0. 0. F., would
respectfully report that in our judgment, in a case where a widow
of a deceased brother of a Lodge dies leaving no children or de-
pendent relative, or relatives, on whom she is dependent, and also
leaving an estate sufficient to pay her funeral expenses, that no per-
son is entitled to said benefits, but that the same should remain
in the Lodge Treasury.
Which was concurred in.
Edwin Farrer, P. G., from the Committee on Finance
and Accounts, submitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodgr, /. O. (). F., of Indiana:
We, your Committee on Finance and Accounts, respectfully re"
port that we have examined the following claims, and recom'
mend that they be allowed and warrants be drawn for the several
amounts, to-wit:
To J. F. Wallick for assistance during session $15 00
" John Reynolds for expenses in instituting Lib-
erty Lodge, No. 710 3 25
" John A. Hornbeck for expenses in re-organiz-
ing Alamo Lodge, etc 7 50
" J. H. Banning for services as proof-reader 2 00
" J. A. Wildman, G. Treas., for assistance 15 00
Which was concurred in.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2375
Edwin Farrer, P. G. , from the same committee, sub-
mitted the following
REPORT^
To the Grand Lody,-, I. O. O. F., of Indiana :
We, your Committee on Finance and Accounts, would respect-
fully recommend that warrants be drawn on the G. Treas. for the
following amounts in full of mileage and per diem of the members
of the Committee on Grievances and Appeals, on Credentials, on
Mileage and Per Diem, and on Finance and Accounts, to-wit;
GRIEVANCES AND APPEALS.
John B. Cockrum, 7 days @ $2....' $14 00
J. B. Kimball, 7 days and mileage 22 00
J. B. Kenner, 7 days and mileage 19 25
Enoch G. Hogate, 7 days and mileage 14 95
George Shirts, 7 days and mileage 15 10
MILEAGE AND PER DIEM.
Lawrence Gates, 2 days and mileage $12 05
J. S. Byer, 2 days and mileage 6 20
L. G. Aikin, 2 days and mileage 4 20
CREDENTIALS.
J. E. Bodine, 3 days .. $6 00
John J. Lingle, 3 days and mileage 12 05
A. C. Beecher, 3 days and mileage 14 10
Harry C. Ray, 3 days and mileage 7 35
Walter I. Hughes, 3 days and mileage 8 40
FINANCE AND ACCOUNTS.
D. B. Shideler, 3 days , $6 00
Edwin Farrer, 3 days and mileage 7 95
H. C. Scearce, 3 days and mileage 7 60
J. M. Lang, 3 days and mileage 10 90
U. H. Hon, 3 days and mileage 9 70
Which was concurred in.
Edwin Farrer, P..G., from the same committee, submit-
ted the following
REPORT:
To (he Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. K, of Indiana:
We, your Committee on Finance and Accounts, would respect-
fully report that we have examined the following claims of District
Deputy Grand Masters for postage, etc., and recommend that they
be allowed and warrants drawn for the several amounts, to-wit :
E. P. Summerfield, D. D. G. M., Jennings county.. ,. $1 06
Jno. 0. Spurgeon, D. D. M. (for 1894), Grant county, 2 00
James Alexander, D. D. G. M., Knox county, 3 00
J. R. Sutherland, D. D. G. M., Washington county, 1 00
Which was concurred
in.
2376 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
J. W. Cooper, P. G. Rep., from the Committee on
Subordinate Constitutions and Laws, submitted the fol-
lowing
REPORT:
To the- rmnnl hnd,,r, I. O, <). F., of Indiana:
We, Your Committee on Subordinate Lodge Constitutions and
By-Laws, to whom was submitted " By-Laws and Rules of Order" of
Alamo Lodge, No. 230, beg leave to report that we have carefully
examined the same, and respectfully recommend their approval by
this Grand Body. .
Which was concurred in.
R. P. Davis, P. G., from the same committee, submitted
the following
REPORT:
To the Grand J.odge, J. O. O. F., of Indiana:
Your Committee on Subordinate Lodge Constitutions, to whom
was referred the proposed By-Laws of Young America Lodge, No.
243, would submit the following report:
We have carefully examined the proposed By-Laws and find that
they are in accord with and do not conflict with any of the pro-
visions of the General Laws. We would recommend that the num-
bers of the sections in Article IV be changed so as to make Section
10 take the place of Section 3, and the sections following changed
to conform with their respective positions in the article.
Which was concurred in.
D. C. Searles, P. G., from the same committee, submitted
the following
R E P O R T :
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. <). F, nf Indiana :
Your Committee on Subordinate Lodge Constitutions, to whom
was referred the proposed By-Laws of Cardonia Logde, No. 589, beg
leave to submit the tollowing report: That we have carefully ex-
amined the same and find that they conform to the General Laws
with the following exceptions : In Article V, Section 5, we recommend
that the words, "the Relief Committee" be stricken out and the
words " a Lodge " be placed in lieu thereof In Article VI, Section 1,
we recommend that the words " One-half mile from the residence"
be stricken out, and the words " to the place of interment" be sub-
stituted therefor. We recommend that all of Article XI be stricken
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2377
out, as being an attempt to change qualification for membership.
We recommend that all of Article XII be stricken out, as being
contrary to law.
With the above corrections we recommend that said By-Laws be
approved.
Which was concurred iu.
Morgan Manley, P. G., from the same committee, sub-
mitted the following ,
REPORT:
To the Grand Ij„hn\ L O. O. F., nf Indiana :
Your Committee on Subordinate Lodge Constitutions and By-
Laws, to whom was referred the By-Laws of Star Lodge, No. 236,
I. 0. 0. F., located at Glendale, Ind., would respectfully report that
we have examined the same and find them in accordance with the
General Laws, and would recommend that they be approved, with
the following exceptions :
1. Section 3, Article III, fixing the amount of the bond of the
Permanent Secretary at $300 be changed to |500.
2. That the title of Section 8, Article IV, be changed to read
"funeral expenses" instead of "funeral benefits."
Which was concurred in.
J. W. Cooper, P. G. Rep., from the same committee,
submitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand J.odye, I. 0. O. F., of Indiana :
Your Committee on Subordinate Constitutions, to whom was
referred the By-Laws of Golden Star Rebekah Lodge, No. 452, of
Whiting, Indiana, have had the same under consideration, and
make the following report ; While we find many of the provisions
contained in said By-Laws which seem to us not necessary to the
proper administration of the affairs of that branch of the Order, we
have permitted them to remain because not in conflict with the
Constitution and Laws of this Grand Lodge. We have, however,
found many of the provisions thereof not in harmony therewith,
and have therefore made such changes by erasures and insertions,
as well as additions, as we believe will harmonize them with the
General Laws. These changes have been so numerous that to set
them out in detail in this report would extend the same to an
unreasonable length, and we believe would not serve any good pur-
pose.
We therefore recommend that said By-Laws, as so changed by
the committee, be approved.
Which was concurred in.
2378 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
C. F. Crecelius, P. G., from the same committee, sub-
mitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand LoJyf, I., O. 0. F., of Indiana:
Your Committee on Subordinate Lodge Constitutions and By-
Laws, to whom was referred the By-Laws of Manchester Lodge,
No. 613, have examined the same and report that we find nothing
therein which conflicts with the Constitution and Laws of this
Grand Lodge. We would therefore recommend that the same be
approved.
Which was concurred in.
J. W. Tingle, P. G., from the Committee on Petitions
and Applications, submitted the following
REPOR'J':
To the. Grand Lodge, I. O. O. F., of Indiana :
Your Committee on Petitions and Applications, to whom was
referred the circular letter from the Grand Master of the Jurisdic-
tion of Wyoming asking permission to appeal to the Lodges of this
jurisdiction for aid to assist in rebuilding a hall at Cheyenne,
Wyoming, recently destroyed by fire, respectfully report that we
have had the same under consideration and desire to say to our
sister I'urisdiction that we deeply deplore their great financial loss
and extend them our fraternal sympathies, but, in view of the
numerous calls of a similar nature coming from our own jurisdic-
tion, we deem it inexpedient to grant such request at this time, and
recommend that the petition be not granted.
Which was concurred in.
M. H. Chappell, P. G., from the Committee on the
Degree of Rebekah, submitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand lodge, I O. O. F., of Indiana :
We, your Committtee on the Degree of Rebekah, to whom was
referred so much of the Grand Master's Report concerning the
granting of dispensations for Charters for Rebekah Degree Lodges,
beg leave to report that we have examined the petitions for the
same, and recommend that the Grand Lodge concur in granting
charters to the following Lodges :
Stella, No. 468; Saratoga, No. 469; Sadie, No. 470; Star, No. 465;
Lone Star, No. 471 ; Wilkinson, No. 472; Liberty, No. 473 ; Martha,
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2379
No. 474; Samantha, No, 475; Charity, No. 476; Arlington, No. 477;
Welcome, No. 478; Naomi, No. 479; Oak Leaf, No. 480; Economy,
No. 481 ; Van Buren, No. 482; Eden, No. 483 ; Evergreen, No. 484;
Anna, No. 485.
Which was concurred in.
M. H. Chappell, P. G., from the same committee, sub-
mitted the following
R E P (3 R T :
To (he Grand Ijodge, I. O. O. F., of Indiana:
Your Committee on Degree of Rebekah, to whom was referred
the petition of Sister Sarah Walker and forty-three others, members
of Ruth Lodge, No. 63, Degree of Rebekah, at Aurora, Indiana, rep-
resenting that for want of harmony in said Lodge it does not suc-
ceed and is not prospering, and asking that where a certificate is
presented from the D. D. G. M. of the district to which said Lodge
belongs showing that withdrawal cards are held by him for the
petitioners for the charter, have considered the same and recom-
mend that when the application for a charter accompanied by the
proper certificates of membership by the petitioners is presented to
the Grand Master, that he direct that a charter be issued to said
petitioners.
Which was concurred in,
Frank G. Epply, P. G., from the same committee, sub-
mitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, T. O. O. F., of Indiana :
We, your Committee on the Degree of Rebekah, to whom was
referred the petition of Bro. George W. Worley and nine (9) others,
whose withdrawal cards accompany petition, asking the institution
of a Rebekah Degree Lodge at Silver Lake, Kosciusko county,
would recommend the prayer of the petitioners be granted, and a
charter be issued in accordance therewith.
Which was concurred in.
John T. Leach, P. G., from the same committee, sub-
mitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. O. F., of Indiana:
We, your Committee on the Degree of Rebekah, to -whom was
referred the petition of Lawrence Lodge, No. 388, whose effects were
2380 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ,
destroyed by fire on the 4th of December last, and now asking aid
from sister Lodges and duplicate charter, beg leave to report
against soliciting aid, and recommend the granting of a duplicate
charter.
Which was concurred in.
W. W. Canada, P. G., from the same committee, sub-
mitted the following
REPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. 0. F., of Indiana :
We, your Committee on the Degree of Rebekah, beg leave to
report that we have carefully examined the By-Laws of Evening
Star Lodge, No. 465, and have corrected such sections as conflict
with the General Laws ; also those of Victoria Lodge, No. 467. We
would therefore recommend the approval of both.
Which was concurred in.
B. W. Smith, P. G., submitted the following resolution:
Resolved, That the Grand Representatives of this Grand Lodge be
instructed to stand by the action of the Sovereign Grand Lodge
upon the question of the qualifications for membership in the Re-
bekah Degree Lodges.
Which was concurred in.
J. F. Mann, P. G., from the Committee on Legislation, I
submitted the following
R E P 0 R ^r :
To the Grand Lodge, T. O. O. F., of Indiana:
The Committee on Legislation, to whom was referred the amend-
ment proposed by J. F. Mann on yesterday, found on page 2363, and
proposing to amend Sec. 2, Article II, of the Constitution, as fol-
lows:
" To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. F, of Indiana :
" We hereby offer the following as an amendment to Section 2,
Article II, of the Constitution, viz.:
" Sec. 2. The Grand Lodge shall hold one Communication in
each year, commencing on the first Wednesday after the third
Tuesday in November. The Grand Lodge may adjourn from day to
day, until the business of the session is disposed of All meetings
of the Grand Lodge shall be held in the city of Indianapolis.
Provided, That, commencing with the year 1899, there shall be
two regular Communications in each year, commencing on the first
Wednesday after the third Tuesday in May and Noveml)er. The
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2381
May session to be designated as the Semi-Annual Communication
and the November session as the Annual Communication. "
Your committee would recommend that the consideration of the
proposed amendment be postponed until the next session of this
Grand Body, as provided by law.
Laid over until next session.
, A. N. Grant, P. G. Rep., submitted the following reso-
lution :
Rssolved, That the Secretaries of Carmel Lodge, No. 401, Sheri-
dan Lodge, No. 691, and Zionsville Lodge, No. 285, be and are
hereby directed to prepare and transmit under seal of said Lodges a
complete transcript of all proceedings had (if any not heretofore
forwarded) in said Lodges in the case of Carmel Lodge vs. Bro.
John T. McShane, to the Grand Secretary of this Grand Lodge,
and that said complete record be sent up to the Sovereign Grand
Lodge in the transcript required by law to be forwarded under seal
of this Grand Lodge, and if any part of said record should not be
paid for by Bro. McShane, then the same to be paid for by said
Carmel Lodge.
Which was concurred in.
W. H. Leedy, P. G. Rep., called up the following re-
port submitted at yesterday's session :
To the Grand Lodge, I. 0. 0. F., of Indiana :
Your Committee on Legislation, at the November session, 1894,
(pages 2182-2183), were instructed to amend Section 13, Chapter
IV, of the General Laws by adding the following :
" It shall be the duty of each Subordinate Lodge to enact such
by-law for the enforcement of the provisions of this section as it
may deem most efficient, and such by-law shall be the only law for
the enforcement thereof.
" Should any member be dissatisfied with the enforcement of
said by-law in any case, he may appeal to a Committee of Past
Grands in the same manner as provided for in Section 15 of this
Chapter. "
By an inadvertance, your committee overlooked your instruction,
but take this, the first opportunity possible, to comply therewith.
Therefore, in compliance with and respect for your instructions, we
recommend the adoption of the said amendment.
On motion the report was concurred in.
2382
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
Lawrence Gates, P. G. Rep., from the Committee on
Mileage and Per Diem, submitted the following
KEPORT:
To the Grand Lodge, I. O. 0. F., of Indiana :
Your Committee on Mileage and Per Diem would respectfully
report that they have completed the mileage and per diem of the
Officers and Representatives of this Gra"nd Lodge, and would sub-
mit the following report ;
M. A. Chipman, Grand Master . . .
C. F, Northern, Deputy Grand Master
George Reinhard, Grand Warden . .
U. Z. Wiley, Grand Rep. S. G. L. . .
A. J. Gary, Grand Chaplain, pro tem .
A. J. Rutlidge, Grand Marshal . . .
G. W. Sowerwine, Grand Conductor .
O, Hadley, Grand Guardian
Fred Kimbley, Grand Herald ....
W. H. Leedy, Grand Instructor . . .
$1 80
2 35
$4 00
4 10
1 65
9 50
1 55
70
6 05
I -I
$5 80
6 35
4 00
8 10
6 65
13 50
5 55
4 70
10 OJ
4 00
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
REPRESENTATIVES.
2383
•Lodges
New Albany
Monroe . .
Jeffersonville
Friendship .
Morning Star
Union . . .
Patiiot . . .
New Albany
Washington.
Chosen Friends
Fort Wayne
Lafayette , ,
Wayne . . .
Center . . ,
Harmony .
Wabash .
Friendship
Hoosier .
Spartan .
Heneosis Adel
Delphi . .
South Bend
Penn. . .
Fayette .
Charity ....
Attica . . .
Elkhart County
Franklin . . .
Laporte . . .
Montgomery ,
Shelby ....
Logan ....
White Water .
Lafontaine . .
Philoxenian . .
Putnam . . .
St. Anas. Mesnil
Rochester. . .
Mount Vernon
Carlisle ...
Terre Haute .
Miami ....
Representatives
J. F. Horton . .
H, B. Davison .
W. II. Northcutt
William Nearman
J H. Goldsmith
John H. Barrows
A. R Wade
W. J. Terry
Fred Harper
G. W. Taylor
Phil Richards
H. M. Eberhard
M. L. Bowmaster
Charles E. Rubush
J. Pflieger ....
J. F. Lewis . . .
Charles E. Davis
James A. Maudlin
L. Mester . , .
M. L. Gephart .
W. S. Thayer . .
W. W. Meffer .
P. T. McCammon
John C. White .
H. W. Robinson
F. Springman . .
C. W. Merrill .
D. M. Kinney .
J. W. Hewitt . .
A. Ward ....
H. C. Van Way
C. W. King . .
W. Kerman . .
E. E. Kelsey . .
G. W. Hoffman .
N. G. Each . .
M. A. Dickover .
J. P. Stinson . .
P. Howard . . .
J, T. Aikin . . .
W. H. Bechelder
D. M. Butt . . .
116 $5
86 4
108
102
180
90
115
115
8(5
$4 00
$9 75
8 30
9 40
9 10
13 00
8 50
9 75
9 75
8 30
8 50
9 90
20
10
40
60
60
10
8 10
6 85
8 .40
7 90
11 35
5 95
11 40
6 15
5 35
7 85
7 40
9 36
4 CO
5 90
8 40
8 90
13 35
9 45
7 66
7 75
2384
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
REPRESENTATIVES— Continued.
V
Lodges.
Representatives.
6
o
i
1
^
^
to
bb
Tippecanoe
H. G. Coe
64
3 20
4 00
7 20
66
Chequeuk . .
P. A. Marquart , . .
162
7 60
4 00
11 60
67
Warren . . .
[. C. Russell ....
86
4 36
4 00
8 25
58
Columbus . .
. . . j'Wm. F. Taylor . . .
41
2 05
4 00
6 05
59
Fidelity . . .
. . . H. L. Mullen . . .
44
2 20
4 00
6 20
60
Pulaski . . .
. . . D. S. Mayer ....
157
7 85
4 00
11 85
61
Ridgely . . .
. . . jSam T. McDaniel . .
89
1 95
4 00
5 96
62
Kosciusko . .
. . . lM. Manley
122
6 10
4 00
10 10
63
Protection . .
. . . George Murray . . .
73
3 65
4 00
7 05
64
Princeton . .
Wm. Lockhart . .
162
8 10
4 00
12 10
66
Ringgold . .
George Todd ....
94
4 70
4 00
8 70
67
Salem ....
Charles Schlagel . .
132
6 60
4 40
10 60
69
Eden ....
J. P. Erben ....
107
5 35
4 00
9 35
71
Howard . . .
M.T. Kelley . . . .
62
3 10
4 OL'
7 10
72
Madison . . .
A. J. West
86
4 30
4 00
8 30
73
Mt. Ida. . . ,
G. S. Henninger . .
86
4 30
4 00
8 30
74
Muncie . . .
W. A. Meeker . . .
54
2 70
4 00
6 70
75
Mesheku'no'qh
Sam Dunbar ....
110
6 50
4 00
9 60
76
Johnson . . .
A. Watson ....
21
1 05
4 00
5 05
77
Burlington . .
John D. Stanford . .
69
3 46
4 00
7 45
78
Chapman . .
H. M. Livingston
101
5 05
4 00
9 05
80
Magnolia . .
Arthur Johnson . . .
80
4 00
4 00
8 00
81
Kossuth . . .
H. Ader
92
4 60
4 00
8 60
82
Amana . . .
A. A. Gillespie . .
63
3 15
4 00
7 15
83
Hope ....
Geo. B. Gardner . .
115
6 lb
4 00
9 76
84
New Harmony.
L. F. Powell ....
62
3 10
4 00
7 10
87
Pendleton. . .
L. Pelham
207
10 S6
4 00
14 35
88
Olive Branch .
Ed. McVaugh . . .
28
1 40
4 00
6 40
89
Americus
. *.
H. M. Brown ....
61
,2 56
4 00
6 55
92
Tabor ....
A. I. Frank ....
108
5 40
4 CO
9 40
94
^harlestown .
John Prather ....
104
5 20
4 00
9 20
95
Herndon . . .
W. A. Pruitt . .
31
1 56
4 00
5 66
96
Mississinewa .
E. Lawton
68
3 40
4 00
.7 40
97
Fall Creek . .
Sam H. Hupp . . .
45
2 26
4 00
6 25
99
Knightstown .
E. G. McGraw . . .
34
1 70
4 00
5 70
100
James ....
Thos. E. Huston . .
222
11 10
4 00
15 10
101
Dufour . . .
John Grames ....
86
4 30
4 00
8 30
102
Reserve . . .
R. W. Peters ....
67
3 35
4 00
7 36
103
Decatur . . .
W. Haas
47
2 36
4 00
6 35
104
Vewburgh . .
E. H. Locke ....
190
9 60
4 00
13 50
105
Russiaville . .
H. W. Cline ....
62
3 10
4 00
7 10
107
Monticello . .
Charles W. Davis . .
84
4 20
4 00
8 20
108
Frankfort.. . .
. . .
W. W. Ross . . . . 1
47
2 35
4 00
6 36
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
REPRESENTATIVES -Continued.
2385
Lodges.
Representatives.
110
111
112
113
114
115
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
129
130
131
183
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
142
143
144
145
146
147
149
150
151
152
164
l55
156
157
158
159
163
Liverpool
Milton .
Utica. .
Orange
BluflFton
Carpentersville
Chinkaroror
Winchester
Crescent .
Silcox . .
Capital
Noblesville
Indiana .
Moore's Hill
Germania
Reliance .
Anderson
Kokomo .
Fairview .
Greenfield
Westville .
Worthington
Schiller .
Everton .
Spencer .
Eureka. .
Iroquois .
Hebron .
Relief . .
Owen . .
Sullivaa .
Glenn . .
Silvers . .
Camden .
Union City
Abington .
Morton .
Walnut Level
Fort Harrison
North Salem .
Star in the West
Covenant . .
B. P. Sayers .
J. O. Bragg .
J. R. Ferguson
J, A. Jenkins .
Charles Lewis .
John A Pickel
J, W. Meredith
J. G. Demint .
F, Thorn . .
G. T. Pattison .
Joseph Hall . .
J. R, Christian
Thos. S. Leep .
Charles Schabel
H. A. Kolker .
J. L. Maxedon
A. Delcamp .
Alvin McDowell
W. R. Hickman
Albert White .
G. L. Howell
E. F. Haxton
L. Ellerbuch .
I. T. Trusler .
J. A. Karney .
A. W. Funkhouser
W. H. Hoover .
J. F. Richardson
T. J. Cartwright
F. M. Partin
Robert Calvert ,
M, Christman
Thos. E. Lamb
Henry Richter
W. W. Carter
D. H. Mcintosh
Thomas Casey
William Gipe
R. S. Brown .
Samuel Elder .
Charles A. Billman
W. B. Harney . .
46
10
171
8
110
5
216
10
89
4
44
2
98
4
51
2
$11 15
6 75
9 70
10 55
8 65
6
7
7
13
4
4
5
9
8
4
10 45
5 80
6 70
8 10
6 06
11 10
7 55
18 00
7 35
14 80
12 55
9 50
14 80
8 45
6 20
8 90
6 55
7 60
7 50
8 20
7 56
7 56
6 75
7 55
5 40
12 20
6 86
238(;
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
REPRESENTATIVES -Continued.
Lodges.
Representatives.
164
166
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
187
188
189
190
191
192
198
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
202
203
204
205
206
208
209
210
211
Grand Prairie
Clinton .
Cecelia. .
St. Marys.
Winamac .
Oxford . .
Parker . .
Richland .
Delaware
Osceola .
Carroll . .
Pacific . .
Columbia .
Shawswick
Edwards .
Stewart. .
Angola . .
Trafalgar .
Phoenix. .
Rossville .
Greensfork .
Shannondale
Brownsburg.
Selma. . . .
Francesville
Wildey. . .
Terrell . . .
Hiawatha .
Purity . . .
Crown Point
Morgantown
Waldron .
Greenwood
Hermann
Quincy . .
Ogden . .
Bourbon .
Seymour .
Clayton .
Tell City
Farmland .
Canal. . .
Teutonia .
Morgan .
W. B. Roderick
Wm. Kelley .
Wm. Brookshire
J. F. Mann .
H. Taylor . .
C. A. Moore .
W. A. Knapp
J. R. Harris .
Ed. Chance .
S. A. Jett . .
H. McCain . .
R. C. Hammonder
E. R. Meely .
August Unkel
W. Barcus . .
N. R. Nye . .
W. H. Lane .
T. J. Paskins .
J. A. Myers .
D. H. Lutz . .
E. A. Burton .
C. R. Beck . .
D. P. Etris . .
John W. EUer
W. Thrasher .
C. B. Hollingsworth
Charles Morgan .
W. J. Parish . .
Geo. M. Fowler
S. P. Vanwinkle
James Kemfpel .
David Warland .
Geo. W. Christian
John Burkhart .
J. N. Decker . .
W. D. Helms . .
A. W. Richie . .
W. E. Hoadley .
M. F. Jones . .
J. Trumpi . . .
J. H. Rittenhour
Charles A. Wright
William Guelzow
Charles Hadley .
$3 75
3 20
3 00
6 30
5 10
8 05
2 00
70
3 00
5 15
2 15
2 40
1 60
4 15
7 55
1 70
1 70
55
3 40
2 00
1 85
5 00
2 95
1 00
10 90
3 26
9 50
7 40
76
$4 00
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
REPRESENTATIVES -Continued.
2387
Lodges.
213
214
215
217
220
221
222
223
224
225
227
228
229
281
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
250
251
252
253
254
255
257
259
260
262
Springfield .
Stewartsville
Brazil . . .
Waveland .
Tipton . . .
Waterloo . .
Necessity
Crawfordsville
Border . . . ,
Galveston . ,
Luther . . .
Concordia ,
Adullum . .
Fremont
Losantville .
McCarty . .
Humboldt .
Gregg . . .
Star
Cadiz . . .
Larwill . .
Mt. Pleasant
lUiana . . .
York. . , .
Mitchell . .
Young America
Holton . .
Lowell
Laughery Valley
Greensboro .
Trenton . .
Azur ....
Ashboro . .
Cicero . . .
New Haven
Richmond .
Carthage . .
Pierceton
Osgood . . .
Utilis . . .
Hartford City
Representatives.
T. F. Ranceran
B. M. Almon .
Charles Hammerstein
L. E. Acker . ,
A. Swoveland
George Shafer
T. F. Brenaman
C. A. Miller . ,
C. H. Hockersmith
A. J. Shirley . .
A. T. Gardner .
Ferd Henkel . .
John Flueckiger
Moses Kinsey
John H. Moyer .
Joseph C. Morgan
Jacob Hahn . .
D. A. Jordan . .
J. H. McCaferty
A. D. Moore . .
F. G. Smith . .
Eugene Burch .
J. M. Lindsay .
E. M. Shockley .
John Carpenter
J. E. Heinmiller
J. J. Schofield .
Henry Werley .
P. Rogers . . .
A. B. Barnard
T. W. Baldwin .
F. B, Chamberlain
John Green . . ,
G. H. Timmons
George W. Miller
Frank Farmer .
H. J. Catt . .
L. L. Lampkins
R. Johnson , .
A. C. Willoughby
J. E. Poage . .
131
65
05
85
96
95
30
35
15
3 95
3 00
1 40
5 90
7 70
8 40
2 80
70
75
05
50
00
25
50
55
15
80
50
$4 00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
4 00
4 00
$9 65
14 05
6 85
6 96
5 95
11 30
6 35
6 15
7 95
7 00
5 40
9 90
11 70
12 40
6 80
4 70
9*76
11 06
11 50
6 00
10 25
12 50
8 55
8 16
8 80
7 50
7 80
11 20
8 90
6 90
7 25
10 60
7 30
5 40
10 15
7 40
5 95
10 55
8 40
9 75
7 55
2388 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
REPRESENTATIVES— Continued.
Lodges.
Representa,tives.
263
264
265
266
267
268
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279,
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
296
296
297
298
300
301
304
305
306
Argos
North Manchester
Michigan Cify
Spiceland.
Excelsior .
Jubilee. .
Milan . .
Caldwell .
Tell . . .
Sigel. . .
Martinsville
Little River,
Ako . .
Charlottsvill
Robert Blum
Acton .
White River.
Omega .
Butler .
Monroeville
Schuyler . ,
Zionsville
Monitor. . ,
Spartansburg
Magenta
Fortuna
Hillsboro
Fort Branch.
DeWolf .
Deerfield .
Lynn . .
Wildman
Orleans. .
Ridgeville
Ellettsville
Grandview
Rockfield
Mount Etna.
Blountsville
Dunkirk
W. D. Corry .
J. W. Ram .
Joseph Dunphy
D. L. Pigeon .
M. Moore . .
W, >^. McCrum
John F. Kamman
W. J. Merrifield
Adam Laun . .
John Meissnest .
F. M. McNair .
Jacob Krabs . .
J. E. Jones . . .
E. S. Hill . . .
F. Hermann . .
James Mathews .
O. A. Curry . .
Theo. Bailey . .
F. L. Kiplinger .
John Goodin . ,
William Townsend
James O. Hurst .
A. D. McKnight
W. T. Taylor . .
H. W. Abbott .
George T. Lommell
J. L. Riley . . .
C. W. Emerson .
T. A. Green . .
John A. Fountain
Ben Pearson . .
Frank Sexton
Thomas J. Scully
W. S. Circle . .
T. C. Johnson .
J. Forsythe . .
S. Shuey ....
C. L. Hofner . .
T. W. Day . . .
D. G. Dean . .
$4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
REPRESENTATIVES— Continued.
2389
Lodges.
Representatives.
307
308
309
310
312
314
316
317
318
319
820
321
322
323
324
325
328
329
330
835
836
838
340
841
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
350
352
353
354
355
356
357
339
Sanders . . .
Oakland City
Daleville. .
East Boston .
South Boston
Walton. . .
Kendallville
Eminence. .
Waverly . .
Guttenberg .
Beacon . . .
Sugar Creek
Loon Creek .
Hobah . . .
Goldsmith .
Galveston .
Greentown .
North Vernon
Waynetown
Prospect .
Earle. . .
Allemania
Grant. . .
Alma.
McCordsville
Loogootee
Dunreith
Pittsboro .
Shoals . .
Greenville
Yorktown.
Goodland.
Sharpsville
Greencastle
Brownsville
Shideler. .
Newtonville
Monrovia
Whitestown
Amant . .
Coatsville.
Kingman
G. W. Kane . .
J. Cotterall . . .
L. H. Fenwick .
S. F. Wasson .-
F. N. Williams .
William Ramer .
A. A. France . .
R. E. Rhea . .
S. ShufFelberger .
S. Doenges . . .
G. B. Noland . .
W. W. Berden .
G. W. Bell . . .
Lea Acuff . . .
C. S. Goar .
L. D. Holliday .
W. C. Hamper
F. W. Verbarg .
H. H. Brunt . .
J. V. Grice . . .
William McLaren
O. Jocking . . .
D. R. Barnell .
J. Goerlitz . . .
Thos. J. White .
George R. Bryant
E. F. Healy , .
J. M. Waters . .
W. Krensel . . .
A. M. Wolf . . .
L. Hollis ....
B. F. Butler . .
M. M. Hutto . .
W. F. Hillis . .
P. R. Zimmerman
W. J. Smith . .
B. C. Selby . .
W. G. Pray . .
W. J. Markland
R. H. Washburn
Nathan Fisher .
J. M. Cory . . .
28
$4 00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
2390
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
REPRESENTATIVES— Continued.
V
tp
o
Lodges.
Representatives.
^
i
0
i
Q
a
iz;
i
s
1
^
358
Nereis
Sam Somerville . . .
Charles Burkhalter .
65
57
$8 26
2 85
$4 00
4 00
$7 25
359
Mulberry . . .
6 85
360
Martz ....
J. H. Hout ....
75
3 75
4 00
7 75
361
Heart and Hand
T. N. Wingate
64
3 20
4 00
7 20
362
Markle . . .
C. Rogers . .
115
6 75
4 00
9 75
363
Laurel ....
J. L. Monroe .
75
3 75
4 00
7 75
365
Shequoit . . .
P. Butterbaugh
92
4 60
4 00
8 60
367
Arcadia . . .
L. M. Brown .
31
1 55
4 00
5 66
368
Clay ....
H. H. Heacox
53
2 65
4 00
6 66
369
BunkerHill . .
W. N. Mullen
67
3 35
4 00
7 36
370
Harrell . . .
L. C. Frederick
126
6 30
4 00
10 30
873
Maxinkuckee .
0. L. Cline . .
110
5 50
4 00
9 50
374
Home ....
J. P. Kendall .
40
2 00
4 00
6 00
375
Lawrence . . .
R. S. Records
8
40
4 00
4 40
876
Randolph . ,
Jacob Smith .
76
3 80
4 00
7 80
877
Springport . .
Will Veach .
50
2 00
4 00
6 00
378
Beaver . . .
D. M. Pulver .
127
6 35
4 00
10 36
379
Warrick . . .
A. T. Hopkins
208
10 40
4 00
14 40
380
North Star . .
F. P. Engle .
150
7 50
4 00
11 60
381
Fairmount.
H. Hisley . .
58
2 90
4 00
6 90
382
Goethe . . .
N. Stein, Jr. .
71
3 55
4 00
7 65
383
New Cumberlanc
1
Carl Lewis . .
68
3 40
4 00
7 40
384
Pike
Thomas Bristow
J. P. McWilliams
172
216
8 60
10 80
4 00
4 00
12 60
386
Lynnville . .
14 80
387
Venus ....
J. W. Burrell . .
99
4 95
4 00
8 95
389
Hazelton . . .
G. F. Jones .
131
6 56
4 00
10 65
390
Pleasant Valley
R. F. Custer .
71
3 65
4 00
7 65
391
Rexville . . .
J. A. Horton .
86
4 30
4 00
8 30
392
Salamonie . .
F. M. Wall .
85
4 25
4 00
8 25
394
Southport . .
C. E. Moody .
7
36
4 00
4 35
397
New Ross . .
G. W. Lewis .
33
1 66
4 00
6 65
399
Beech Grove .
F. C. Gray . .
32
1 60
4 00
6 60
400
Mexico . . .
William Sloppy
86
4 30
4 00
8 80
401
Carmel ....
B. H. Cook .
16
80
4 00
4 80
403
Sevastopol . .
Sol Arnsberger
120
6 00
4 00
10 00
404
Rising Sun . .
E. Collins . .
103
5 15
4 00
9 15
405
Lexington . .
L. E. Hardy .
87
4 35
4 00
8 36
406
Paragon . . .
H. C. Ross . .
37
1 85
4 00
5 85
407
Grantsburg . .
W. J. Harris .
159
7 96
4 00
11 95
408
Pleasantville .
William Brewer
99
4 95
4 00
8 95
410
Montpelier . .
C. L. Twibell
80
4 00
4 00
8 00
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
REPRESENTATIVES -Continued.
2391
to
0
Lodges.
Representatives.
v
1)
l*J
tuO
Q
o
!/5
rt
e2
d
V
1-.
1^
411
Warrington . . . .
W. H. Beyer ....
J. F. Mattingly
33
$1 65
$4 00
$5 65
412
Blue River .
130
6 50
4 00
10 60
413
Hart . . .
J. A. Holn\es ....
35
1 76
4 00
5 76
415
Staunton . .
C. W. Stewart
61
3 05
4 00
7 05
416
Rural . . .
Thomas Moore . . .
11
55
4 00
4 56
417
Eel River .
J. A. Anheir ....
77
3 86
4 00
7 85
419
Crothersville
H. W. Royce ....
71
8 65
4 00
7 56
420
Prairie . . .
J. S. Smith
92
4 60
4 00
8 60
421
Butlerville .
J. R. Davis ....
69
3 45
4 00
7 45
425
New Corner.
J. W. Brock ....
60
3 00
4 00
7 00
426
Akron
Thomas W. Crickle .
106
5 80
4 00
9 30
428
Independence
A. McMahon ....
58
2 90
4 00
6 90
430
Lake City .
Levi Zernburn . . .
122
6 10
4 00
IC 10
431
Annapolis .
F. S. Byers . .
60
3 00
4 00
7 00
482
Leesburg. .
R. S. Armington . .
128
6 40
4 00
10 40
483
Laban . . .
D. W. Patterson
72
3 60
4 00
7 60
434
New Waverly
P. E. Sanders . . .
82
4 10
4 00
8 10
435
Center . . .
George W. Weir . .
105
5 25
4 00
9 25
437
Walkerton .
Wes McDaniel . . .
131
6 65
4 00
10 66
438
Windfall . .
William Carr . .
59
2 95
4 00
6 95
489
Stockwell .
A. Stanfield ....
51
2 55
4 00
6 55
440
Fisher . . .
Thomas Gibson . . .
15
75
4 00
4 76
442
Star City . .
J. R. Karmen . . .
96
4 80
4 00
8 80
448
Mauckport .
D. B. Beanblossom .
153
7 65
4 00
11 65
444 Flat Rock .
S. Crasier
128
6 40
4 00
10 40
445 Atlanta . .
W. H. Good ....
34
1 70
4 00
5 70
447
Milltown . .
R. Proctor
148
7 15
4 00
11 15
448
Bristol . . .
J. E. Parritt ....
166
8 26
4 00
12 25
449
Clear Creek .
Charles Creek . . .
74
3 70
4 00
7 70
452
Lessing . .
William Rentzel . .
75
8 75
4 00
7 75
458
Tampico . .
George F. Emma . .
78
3 66
4 00
7 66
455
Onward . .
T. P. Conn
65
3 25
4 00
7 25
456
Spring Station
P. C. Jolly
207
10 35
4 00
14 35
457
Bloomfield .
James Byers ....
80
4 00
4 00
8 00
468
Michigan
J. L. Custer . . .
81
4 06
4 00
8 05
460
Fowler . .
T. B. Morris ....
92
4 60
4 00
8 60
461
Big Creek .
*
E. A. Adams ....
80
4 00
4 00
8 00
468
Boswell
E, C. Laughlin . . .
91
4 55
4 00
8 55
464
Star of Hope
William Kemp
113
5 65
4 00
'9 66
465
Indianapolis
J. M. Barkley . . .
4 00
4 00
466
Dupont . .
J. F. Lewis ....
72
' 3 60
4 00
7 60
467
Newark ...
John D. Nash . . .
71
3 55
4 00
7 55
2392
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
REPRESENTATIVES— Continued.
Lodges.
Representatives.
a
<U CI
III
468
470
471
472
473
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
484
485
486
487
488
493
494
495
498
499
500
501
508
504
505
506
507
608
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
617
521
522
628
624
Sandborn .
Galena . ■ . ,
Homer . .
Ben Adhem
Sycamore
Summitville
Vigo .
Morse .
Milford
Boone .
Meridian
Midway
Kempton
Aldine .
Linton .
Shiloh .
Sharon
Brownstown
Atwood
Cement
Burrows
Parke .
Six Mile
Lockport
Hardinsburg
Evening Star
Fort Red .
Paris . . .
Beechwood .
Bee Hunter .'
Irvington
Scipio . . .
Point Isabel
Augusta . .
Fountain . .
Bowling Green
Freedom
Claypool
Bloomingsburg
Windsor . .
Tempa . . .
Coal City .
Veedersburg
Monon . . .
J. W. Edwards .
William E. Well
J. T. Sutton .
G. W. Myers .
G, C. Davidson
J. F. Morris .
J. B. Holmes
A. Shanks . .
A. N. Doty .
J. F. Ashton .
F. E, Bennett
M. Ice . . . .
Sam Goodknight
William Smith
C. E. Davis .
H. B. Stewart ,
W. T. Timmons
W. C. Apgar .
W. J, Beeson .
J. R. Prather .
F. L. Miller .
A. J. Collins .
F. Doughty
G. H. Butler .
J. A. Sudderte
R. E. Simmons
Joseph Court .
J. B. McCarntey
H, B. Bridge
H. Hunt . .
J. Ballard .
A. W. Lewis
L. T. Hale .
Joseph Cropper
A. Spinks
W. C. Smith .
E. A. Phipps .
J. Guinea . .
George Emmons
J. A. HoUoway
N. E. Austin . .
John Giffy . . ,
H. Wirtz . . .
J, K. Wilson . .
$4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
4 00
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
REPRESENTATIVES— Continued.
2393
Lodges.
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
639
540
541
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
561
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
Fellowship
Flora . .
Bicknell .
Cynthiana
Dalton . .
New Salisbury
Mozart . .
Heltonville
Metosinia .
Oakland . .
Centenary .
Dearborn .
Denver . .
Peru ....
Allen . . .
Orland . .
Pisgah . . .
Rising Star .
Owensburg .
Forest . . .
Bruceville .
Broad Ripple
Lone Star .
New Marion
Hackleman
Jackson .
Nebraska
Blue Ridge
Miller . .
Idaville .
Palace . ,
Valeene .
Clarksburg
Cowan . .
Algiers . .
Ivy . . .
Anchor
Lovely Dale
Myrtle . .
Falmouth
Glenwood
Representatives.
M. Crow . . .
J. A. McMahan
George Phillips
C. W. Fisher .
M. Melbert .
Robert Allen
Fred Hauser .
M. C. Gregory
J. H. Scott . .
O. Klepper . .
A. E, Smith .
T. M. Cottingham
T. D. Manchester
L. IliflF ....
F. P. Foor . . .
Fred Snyder . .
Samuel Fettinger
O. C. Larue . .
W. E. Buckner .
John Bennett . .
T. Dason ....
M. Todd ....
T. J. Brown . .
George W. Burton
B. C. Howell .
C. R. Burrough
Emmons Low
D. B. Fox .
A. L. Ray . .
George T. Townsley
D. H. Thiby
James E. Trinkle
George W. Lyons
Frank Nottingham
H. L. Arnold .
A. A. Rogers . .
J. E. Twineham
A. Yates . . .
W. A. Bingaman
John Higley . .
William Vandiver
$5
$4 00
00
75
90
70
50
90
15
75
50
75
86
00
80
50
40
30
00
15
15
90
60
75
95
60
15
25
2 90
2 80
6 75
4 10
5 70
6 60
4 30
2 50
2 35
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
CO
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
4 00
2394
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
REPRESENTATIVES— Continued.
i
a
Lodges.
Representatives.
f
o
6
^
s
w
s
1
570
571
572
573
574
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
586
587
588
589
591
592
593
594
595
598
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
618
619
Kent .
Cutler .
Bee . .
Noble .
Gotthard
Silver. Lake
Richland City
Elizabeth
Eagle . .
Fulton . .
Dana. . .
Spurgeon .
Setting Sun
Graysville
Livonia .
Brimfield
Marion
Cardonia .
Mentor .
Sexton .
Scircleville
Vermillion
Olive . .
Orion . .
Green Oak
Calumet .
Garrett. .
Hymera .
Bird's Eye
Otterbein .
Amon . .
Kennard .
Skelton .
North Madison
Springtown
Colfax . .
Manchester
Mount Ayr
Comet . .
Oriole . .
Leiter's Ford
South Milford
H, A. Watts .
R. L. Peltz . .
T. E. Littell .
W. S. Canfield
W. F. Bopp .
L. W. Myers .
E. Wilson . .
J. D. Woddell
J. F. Pepper .
James Bryan
J. D. Smith . .
B. F. Lane
John T. Higgins
O. W. Crow . .
B. F. Hardin . .
Thomas L. Imes
J. W. Guiney
Benj. Douglass .
M. Boland . . .
L. A. Vranberger
J. A. McLeland
E. B. Brown .
William Denny
A. Arrick . .
S. C. Keel . .
H. B. Dryer .
H. E. Gettil .
Charles Barnhart
G. W. Scott .
G. H. Leaman
Paul Nast . . ,
A. J. Daniels .
H. J. St. Clair
W. S. Chapman
James M. Austin
F. Holliday .
Charles Martin
G. W. Clark .
C. T. Mahan ,
John Handford
W. Brugh . .
George Gunn .
94
$4 70
$4 00
61
3 05
4 00
100
5 00
4 00
132
6 60
4 00
77
3 85
4 00
110
5 50
4 00
218
10 90
4 00
130
6 50
4 00
180
9 00
4 00
97
4 85
4 00
75
3 75
4 00
81
4 05
2 00
150
7 50
4 00
107
5 35
4 00
138
6 90
4 00
154
7 70
4 00
66
3 30
4 00
61
3 05
4 00
146
7 30
4 00
58
2 90
4 00
53
2 65
4 00
76
3 80
4 00
163
8 15
4 00
99
4 95
4 00
94
4 70
4 00
163
8 15
4 00
145
7 25
4 00
93
4 65
4 00
167
8 35
4 00
75
3 75
4 00
154
7 70
4 00
36
1 80
4 00
207
10 35
4 00
84
4 20
4 00
148
7 40
4 00
64
2 70
4 00
79
3 95
4 00
110
5 50
4 00
92
4 60
4 00
90
4 50
4 00
98
4 90
4 00
153
7 65
4 00
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
REPRESENTATIVES— Continued.
2395
Lodges.
Representatives
'
g
V
,n
M
Q
OJ
u
;§
s
^
200
$10 00
$4 00
87
4 35
4 00
108
5 40
4 00
87
4 35
4 00
7fc
8 90
4 00
110
5 50
4 00
25
1 25
4 00
92
4 60
4 00
148
7 40
4 00
71
3 65
4 00
126
6 30
4 00
80
4 00
4 00
97
4 85
4 00
90
4 50
4 00
185
9 26
4 00
222
11 10
4 00
85
4 25
4 00
60
3 CO
4 00
162
8 10
4 00
94
4 70
4 00
124
6 20
4 00
69
2 95
4 00
66
3 25
4 00
3
16
4 00
133
6 66
4 00
206
10 30
4 00
87
4 35
4 00
166
8 30
4 00
164
8 20
4 00
85
4 25
4 00
52
2 60
4 00
54
2 70
4 00
60
2 50
4 00
43
2 16
4 00
4
20
4 00
52
2 60
4 00
4 00
70
3 50
4 00
105
6 25
4 00
185
9 25
4 00
80
4 00
4 00
77
3 85
4 00
95
4 70
4 00
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
636
636
687
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
646
646
647
648
649
650
661
662
653
654
656
656
658
659
660
661
663
664
666
Gentryville .
Farmersburg
Pleasant . .
Newberry .
Swayzee . .
Medarysville
Valley . . .
Lyonton . .
New Amsterd
Anoka . . .
Yellow River
Tangier . .
Van Buren .
Geneva. . .
Dubois . . .
Chandler . .
Unity . . .
Rose ....
Salem Center
Lincolnville .
Georgetown .
Bright Light
Carlos City .
Harris . . .
Silver Valley
Dale. . . .
Lyons . . .
Hamilton . .
Newton Stewart
Deedsville .
Mooreland .
Energy . .
Harper. . .
Milroy . . .
Brightwood.
New Point .
Samaritan .
Battle Ground
Monterey -
Elberfeld .
Cedar . . .
Amboy . .
Landess . .
H. C. Rundell .
D. McCIannahan
U. I. Newkirk
A. Musselntian
I. Pennington
Calvin McCoy
W. T. Bennett
W. S. Pigg .
Curtis Mourer
W. H. H. Tucker
Jacob Bozarth
P. V. Bardin ,
Robert Pilkington
I. N. Veley . .
William Jarboe
W. F. Norwood
H. D. Hunt .
John A. Tracey
James Parsell .
John Reed . .
W. E. King .
J. J. Archer .
F. C. Pursley .
William Graper
C. W. Akers .
S. A. Singleton
Lewis Fry . .
F. J. Sanxter .
J. F. Zimmerman
E. O. Deeds .
S. S. Heiny .
I. N. Rich . .
James S. Boyle
O. C. Richey .
W. C. Aldridge
O. A. Cheek .
Charles Meador
J. R. Fisher .
C. C. Wright .
James Wallis .
J. Wagstaff . .
Charles Appleman
H. D. Nisewanger
$14 00
8 36
9 40
7 90
9 50
5 25
8 €0
11 40
7 55
10 30
8 00
8 85
8 50
13 25
15 10
8 25
7 00
12 10
8 70
10 20
6 95
7 25
4 16
10 65
14 30
8 35
12 30*
12 20
8 25
6 60
6 70
6 50
6 15
4 20
6 60
4 00
7 50
9 25
13 26
8 00
7 85
8 70
2396
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
REPRESENTATIVES— Continued.
i
O
1-1
Lodges.
Representatives.
hi
S
.2i
O
6
«•
^
^
666
St. Bernice ....
John Harris ....
82
$4 10
$4 00
$8 10
667
Young's Creek
N. A. Lindley . . .
135
6 75
4 00
10 76
668
Shipshewana .
Amos Junod ....
189
9 46
4 00
13 45
669
Spades . .
Charles E. Wisehan
68
3 40
4 00
7 40
670
Stone Ezel .
A. Percifield ....
47
2 36
4 00
6 35
671
St Joe . . .
C. A. Jenkins . . .
166
7 80
4 00
11 80
672
Banquo . .
A. L. Watkins . . .
92
4 60
4 00
8 60
673
Tiosa . . .
T. D. Tour ...
103
5 16
4 00
9 15
674
Smith's Valley
D. M. Patterson . .
13
66
4 00
4 66
675
Velpen. . .
J. M. Burlingame . .
190
9 60
4 00
13 60
676
Moltke . . .
W. Kuhn ....
163
8 16
4 00
12 15
677
East Chicago
H. E. Jones ....
163
8 16
4 00
12 16
678
Puritan . .
A. Cook
4 00
4 00
679
Rolling Prairie
F. J. Powell ....
157
■ 7 86
4 00
11 85
680
Lucerne . .
M.Tucker
88
4 40
4 00
8 40
681
Westport .
M. H. Sample . . .
61
3 05
4 00
7 06
682
Oolitic . . .
D. Acuff
60
2 50
4 00
6 60
683
Linn Grove
E. Heller
97
4 85
4 00
8 85
684
Mt. Zion . .
E. Terhune ....
89
4 46
4 00
8 46
685
Youngstown
J. F. Drake ....
79
3 95
4 00
7 96
686
Avilla . . .
Thos. Hudson . . ,
138
6 90
4 00
10 90
687
Wiley . .
George Ridlen . . .
99
4 95
4 00
8 96
688
West Point .
B. Bollinger ....
115
5 75
4 00
9 76
689
Wheatfield .
M. Knapp
140
7 00
4 00
11 00
690
Mapleton
W. H. Sapp ....
4
20 4 00
4 20
691
Sheridan . .
J. B. Cottrell ....
28
1 40
4 00
5 40
692
Hudson . .
G. A. Brugh ....
156
7 80
4 00
11 80
693
Carbon . .
W. G. Willis ....
53
2 66
4 00
6 66
694
North Judson
B. W. Murphy . . .
113
6 65
4 00
9 65
696
Yeddo . . .
F. M. Shull ....
76
3 75
4 00
7 76
696
Fraternity .
George Paugh . . .
167
8 36
4 00
12 35
697
Alton . . .
J. P. Culver ....
181
9 05
4 00
13 05
698
Rosedale . .
Thomas Conley . . .
83
4 15
4 00
8 16
699
Tuscarora
J. C. Shelley . . .
111
5 66
4 00
9 55
700
Center Point
John W. Hetzer . .
67
3 35
4 00
7 36
701
Amo ....
H. R. Hopkins . . .
26
1 26
4 00
5 26
702
Sellersburg .
A. Herbst
99
4 96
4 00
8 96
703
Saratoga . .
P. A. Daily ....
90
4 50
4 00
8 50
706
Eden . . .
F. M. Ferrell . . .
25
1 26
4 00
6 26
706
Elnora . . .
I. N. Shake . . . -.
93
4 66
4 00
8 66
707
Amico . . ,
J. C. Coulter ....
71
3 66
4 00
7 55
708
Hanna . . .
Thomas L Patrick .
125
6 26
4 00
10 26
Respectfully submitted,
Which was concurred in.
Lawrence Gates,
Jno. S. Byer,
L. G. Akin.
GRAND LODGE OF INBIANA.
2397
Attest :
There appearing no fur-
ther business, after sing-
ing the long meter Doxol-
ogy, and prayer by the
Grand Chaplain, the Grand
Lodge adjourned, sine die.
Orand Master.
Grand Secretary.
EEATTA.
In the Grand Master's report on " Orphans' Home," page 2312,
fourth line from the top, for "four Subordinate and Rebekah Lodges,"
read, " few Subordinate and Rebekah Lodges."
APPENDIX.
2400
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
■pxv^ s^ganaa .sji88a\. -on
-pnpni 'sasnadxa ibjoj,
•sasod
•pB8(i 3q:> SniiCana
soBqdJO Sntj'Bonpa
saiiiraBj psMOpiAi. Jo
•sjaqjojg JO
jaiiaa: loj piBJ ijunorav
p9A3iiaa: 'roBj -pTAl 'ON
) ^ CO : T-H C-.
1 m ^ ic ■'J^ t^ ic I
I CO lO (M .I •* (M I
I CO .-I lO CO CO IM c
I ^ CO -^ "'^ "O "=■ '
1 ^O OOCS OlO
^^SS
oooooo-^oooioooo oooooooovooooo
OOOOOOOOCDO(NiOOiO^OiOOOO(NOi:-COOOO
OO • • O "* O O IC O lO O O :000 ,0 ; : O O O
OO \ I :0 CDlOO(NOt-00 ;iOOO ; (N ; jOOO
- -^ lo 1-H ITS •«* ic o jc^icoio • io : '^loo
ISSi
§§g8g§2
goooooo
) OO O lOO o c
)0(Mt^COTf^ir20C?0^tDli:i<MCOt^t^01ClO<Ml£5^-^0(OCO
H(MOcoooDiomcocoo^r^cocO(NcDOcor^ooo^c-i-^i^io
paAaiieH sjamojg }o -qm
I -* 00r~C5O5.
•a3poT puBJO 01 Sana
SSljoicS^S?SooC05CC^!^CCCCrHOC^oI^010e>)0
O'-HCOr^^-c^i-toiO'M'^'^^aoco^otoccoCt-i'.^ci-^T-Hto
•aSpoi JO sasuadia
ifTt^r-ooiccccit-f-io^t^ior-oo^ooO'^coioo^irso
^C000t0l^C;lOCD10O':OU:i(MOC0OiC(MCir^(^C0CD'^<M00
C<IOI^CC^lClOlOCD00(NC0C<I'^00C<lt^00CCa-. OCOTJ-^OO
-^- — ^■ocsicrHCO'*^cDa:"^iccococ^i:^^HT-Ha;coc*'
— 1 TJi C-IC-I rt
( to o e^ (M T-1 ^
lOlCO OO oc
slOOlOWOrHOOlOlCCMCOO
OrHOOlOlCCMCOO
O O O) (?) U5 CO to «>
•aSpoT^ JO sjdjaoau
jo« in r-o t
•aSpoi aqi JO saDjnosa^
ItMOCOC-lcOt^CDCOCOOt^OC^Ot^COlC
-:t(tOr-ll0001005COOOTtiOOIMOOtECCCOiraC<IO>^COO^t005
0001>-T-l-*t~CO-rHCOlC^tC'300-.-l-*010tOO>COOO:03t^
■^cDr^ioc^r^-'tvnr^cDcococ^cocOT-ico^coooOfMoot^co
cocom-io-^-oco-^-^- go^-cc^r^Vfgf^-co-c-ro-tC,,-^^-
•sjaqniaw
SnittiqutnOQ jo -om
^ to t^ eo O cc 1
icccto-^co-^co-^cotJ:)-^-
ico-»cocoe-)Tfmtocoii
•sqiBaq
•snoisfndxa
•Q '3 'N JOJ pf'ddojci
•papnadsng
•parBisnjaH
•pj^a iSq nMBjpqtiAl
•pj^o ^q pa^timpv
•snonoaCa^i
.c.cc^r-coo>02co*2^2Sgc3S?5SSS§gS?
S a) fc,' O 00 taDiQ * S o'rt
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
2401
lOOOOO^ :0 <
OO ; : (N »0 CO CO t^ O 05 T-H rf CN CO t^ CO QO CO c
rt -* : : CO c^ CO rt r- >-i CO c~ 16 lo co co ti n
) ^ 10 -^ OD C^ CO
H lO •* CO tH r-1 CO
§g^^§5S2^SgiSS§§§SS!g2^Kg§SS
S^KgSS^gg
3SS?igg§
S
195
504
247
844
272
641
621
195
198
499
329
031
445
311
799
g||£gg||||g2
siisisg-i
^ig
^^^-^
1
1-1 T-l C^(N Tl
-H rt
—
8§S§S{2§§g|2§§8§§gS^S§gg?§§§§
gggH^SgSgg
iS?
igg
0
"giliigiipiii«l~i-iiiSHsi
SI-§S-sl-P
;g^
;ii
s
:S§
ggg
I2g
gs
gggg
ggs i
§
iSS
§gSgi
iS
igg
is^
°i"
ss
2f:
■OMOg
oj^r- i
10
iss
^^Srtfr
•tN
igS
gggggSS ig§S
igg
g :§ :gSi
:§
s
s
i
igg
8
g
|SSgg§8 jg^S
j|g
g ii2 ig?g
il
1
1
g
;l-
g
§
j i
i i i
j !
s
1
I
S
:§
s ig
:88§
8 Ig ;
: :
igg
s^
?
?
jS
s ;s
|2S°^
0:0:
M
• 2S
tOrt
§
o>
ooooooogooooooo
oogoogooooooooooooogo
igg
Igg
8
-s-ii2iiiii--s^
i^r-s^ssaip
3gS£|g2^|
;|s
iss
^
. :rH : i^c^cc I : :,^co^
: : -^^ : i 1
: :-
: :«
'-'
lO05t^i-lC0Q01O00tOCO(MI>
K> t- CO I- ^ 10 JH CO t£
:-?S
f2S§§^5JSiSS§S§§Sg
8S5;§s§S^f2§ig?5£5
ssssssgss
§s§g
^Sg§S
^SS?53=^S^^^3gS°^3
^SS»^g53532c:3«^
c^ow^-gcos
x^O*
'■"SS
-
§§25l§?:S5Sg£g§25§
g§igB2S?Sg§SS
SgS^SSKgg
sss?iS'§ss;
180
1,273
122
390
182
251
120
534
2,048
506
110
832
123
57
690
si§i-i5i§is"
§Sg?SgSS?3§
s|S
-r
l:~
iiOiot^Cft^i-Ht-ooootrii-HOoor-c^c
)coot^r^(M<NOr^i-<ooooc505T-fiO'^-i^ooc
)icoo»occic^»Oi-ic^^coiO'^ioc^ *^J^ CO :n CO <
)C--cO»CC^COOiAlO'^'^«OTj-io^OOCftlOOi'^lCO
)^OCD^OC
) o CO o C-; cn
)coai05rHOi5oaocriioooiooocot^cr)ir:)i-(i>,-iioo:>
• r-»cocoioiooiio.-iC:ir~oaiTf(X'COc^oa»Gom'^co
> o ^to oj c^ cc c^r^'fl^^Gs^co r-^c^ "^^ cnco ic o i-i -M lO
'cTc-^ ZD cS^ CO<^<^oicfS'cOCO-^fS'rl^-rpCO<:Sa>'QO-r^
iocfi050ioo^(NiO(Ni:^coasa20i-((Naji-c^cocicot^o>aii-ics-^
Oi-(COOCO(Mir-t-COCOlO-#CC'^'^Oi^«3(MCiO^C<l'^OCOOr-lCSi-H
)Tjt'rJ<-<J<t^cOiM:OCOCOi-HrHlOCOi-ia>t--Tji(M
^C<IOC<la0aiOC0Or-tC0i-l030^C0^OC<»i-l
1 C<J "^^ tDOi-HCCi-Hi-iTjiiOCTJiOOiOOr-iCO
fo^oftD"Ttrio'oo"co"i>rcq"co* y^^c^Tr-T cd"o~ IC
5§222|Sg||§|g§SS|5f2|2|SSg^SigS§SSSgJS^2SgSgB'-S
S5?§^^SgggS§S!5^SS§SgSS^S;?553SSg^SS5;ggS2!§§5~S5g^g
-^
<M^rt ^CO
r^rH : ;
rtc^^ :c^ :-H
-H^ojwiM :m : :c^
<N : :
• i i i"
:
• :
: :
• :
I : •'^
•
: i :
: :
c^
'^ i
CO 10
I
Tf. ;
2
I>Tfl05i-(
-'
CO CO CO
^ :
^-"-'
»«rto^ :
i
:
I i : •
•
•
'-I
i"^
:'-'
■■^ : ;
i
:
l'^
I
-^
'^
-'
'^ ;
;
^ : i =
:
I
^
^
rHrH
^ :
- -^ :
rH : : :c^
10
'-'
•'^
l'^
'^
^ i
coco :^ : 1
: -^ • :
•
:'-'
: :
'^ i'^ :2
.-llOTtt
^
§§SSS§§Sg?55Ji:!gS^^g5gl§g!c§g§3SSSS5gf:?JJ2?:KSf:s§sg£S£
§ is
2402
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
piBj siganaa: .S3[93Ai. 'O^
'sasnadx
-pnpnj 'sasnadxa mox
I iM O CO 05 ct; o) o t
ss^Si
SS§§S2§§§
S§^
8§§Sgggggg
-inj SiqBiUBqo aaqio
oooo
■p^aa 9q:j 3nTi£ina
•BUBqdio SnuBonpa
J9I18JI joj piBj Vnnouiv
o oo
30000000000000000000
•Siaqiojg JO
jaitaa loj piBj ^nnouiv
paAansa 'niBj -piAV -on
paAai[aa saamojg }o -ojj
CO ; CO lo to c
5C0C0O :e<<
aSpoi pu'BiQ o; saner
)ONcoc^oiOrtr-iiommcootocoonococot:-(Ni-(r-o
^l^OC^CCO-^^t^C0CCn-(i-l»0'3'lCC0C^G0OC^T}«0^r^C0
< T-Hio 00 1~ in ic c^ to o 00 to rt CO c<i !M lo o t- C-) in CO coio
aSpoi JO sasnadx^
;gf:f§s
• loo^r-inoioioooc
iinooo^comooc
ICiSOO-^OlOCOlO-^
•aSpoT JO siidiaoaa:
(OOiqOOplOOlOlQOrHOOOCOOinOOOOOlO
-oa>cOTjicoo-9ioo
OOOOlOtOO r-<00
• lOiMr-oc^ eo
•aSpoi aqj jo saoinosa^j
oi>cnioo^o-*T)i
- cq o_to_ en cs o .-I o g
•siaqniaj^
gnT^nqutnoQ jo 'Ojj
I- O O 00 o c
. Tt^ -^ UD O^ QO 00 C
•SpnBJQ ^8BJ
)OOO^^OI>OC
•sq^Bag
:c^i .1-1 :i-i T
•snoisrndxa-
•q d -N JOf paddojg
•papuadsng
•pa}-B}saT9}i
•pjBQ iCq nAJBjpmiAV
•piBj itq pa^iinipv
•snouoaCa^j
•jaqraiiM
.OOOOOOOO.
OS'S
£?= =
S S 5
ft,0Cl3<]HoWSpiHMt?«MQ:2;«§fr<3SC30SuO^
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
2403
s
SSScaglS
^S
?
SUSSES
S^~3gg JCOO j^5
§
sgs^^g^^^
:SS!2
359 62
374 91
1,141 90
369 00
307 83
413 63
806 03
242 63
614 89
87 75
414 79
472 92
329 20
223 30
530 80
160 50
147 50
127 25
95 00
596 60
324 48
263 63
■■■■32"25
348 44
713 00
265 89
236 65
132 28
833 82
96 59
643 62
109 50
276 66
27 18
545 76
318 56
273 96
49 75
15 00
167 45
29 88
124 93
234 50
238 00
898' 25
196 00
102 55
228 00
536 00
183 50
290 25
396 50
65 00
24 00
348 00
269 00
154 00
514 50
160 50
116 00
27 25
9 00
91 00
244 50
140 00
""24'o6
40 00
214 00
216 00
190 00
62 60
669 25
45 00
450 75
74 00
20 00
6 00
346 25
219 40
64 00
11 00
15 00
54 00
21 00
75 00
36 50
15 00
10 00
12 00
18 55
o.,n
:gg :g
j-^ =2
i;:^ is i i ! i i :§
§¥5§S§ : •§§ ig 1 : i ;
100 00
20 00
433 00
20 00
"ioob
375 00
30 00
15 00
150 00
: :§ :§§ : : :§§§ i§ \ \ :§SS :§ j i :§§§
; il ;Kg i i jsss js i \ jgsi ]'$ i \ i§gs
i i l§
Mis
jS i j j
•CO ; I •
§
M M i
iMMMMM
-niiiiii
: : : :
I : : :
8g i ; i
°^ i : i
:Sg i :
;mNHNm
\\\m\
; i : I
98 00
183 00
405 00
164 00
84 00
208 00
161 00
137 50
96 00
215 50
65 00
24 00
278 00
120 00
154 00
420 00
130 50
116 00
16 00
9 00
56 00
184 50
120 00
g'oo
40 00
214 00
186 00
140 00
45 00
503 00
40 00
321 00
56 00
20 00
6 00
210 00
139 00
44 00
8 00
15 00
54 00
21 00
60 00
(M^c^ I :e^ : : :co I joiio :::::::::;:::;::
: : : : : <N 1-1 : : : : : :
m-]Ooor-oii-coooo(Ncot-;co2» :^-^?cicoooco :-^c^ :co.nin^u5«i-«r-(Oj>-co^oa^f^^
1
r-^cooiwcoogw^^oooo^^o^o^or^ : ^ ^ c. t~ cog co t^g. co t^ o. w co^ t~ « co o. o-.
398 65
505 50
1,113 60
302 85
303 60
611 61
698 80
148 40
1,101 61
549 68
52 00
419 60
776 89
342 05
546 05
229 95
296 10
234 70
495 75
117 00
1,003 47
207 00
535 12
4335
250 77
290 10
115 55
389 48
357 55
1,210 05
164 51
951 70
273 10
489 00
46 32
695 26
331 05
349 86
168 60
166 30
187 35
58 46
676 17
2,056 00
3,997 20
10,422 18
3,763 49
4,263 72
4,004 68
16,274 92
2,979 15
6,671 50
9,530 98
2,380 00
10,318 32
15,640 52
5,390 56
1,641 00
6,033 62
6,720 00
4,604 00
8,280 81
4,902 65
4,461 74
4,868 16
6,519 17
70322
1.347 86
14,413 33
2,685 26
3,612 67
4,482 71
6,004 75
3.348 70
5,795 57
2,509 68
2,599 41
605 23
10,148 41
13.649 03
7,476 52
4,646 27
1,175 00
1,491 71
714 36
7,114 83
2^ggl2§|^S|g§g£SSSS|?;S§2 :Sg|SS;f=|SgS5;2§§f=gSggSg
3
SgK^JSgJJ!^?2^5S??g :!5S^?5§5^^ :^SSSg§SSS?5?;'°ggS?S^SSg
:o^
-H :<N :^
; :^ i : •
• : :^ :
• 1 : : i : i'^ : • • : = = :
Tnco : : :
-1 : I :t- : :(mco<n :
<Nooi-^c^ :^ :^ :^(M :^ .
•:::::
^ :
: : : :
:•:::::::::
^^^<N : :
rH^
^ : 1 : :
:-! : :^ : :« : : I
" :^ • i ; : i -^^ : i : =
:^ ■ i^ ':
i : : = i
l'^ : I : 1 I : • • :
rt^ .^ : :^ : j^^ f i | •
■■■.:■:
(M 1
: = : i i
•^ :'^ :^ 1 i 1 ■ :
:^ : :-^-i . :-h : : : : :<m
; = : = ••
i 1
^'^ : 1 : 1 : i ; 1 !
: : :(M : : : I : : : I : : I
^cooo-* :-*-Hwcqco
^c^ : I ic^coco :-! :co I : :w :
ociin^co-HO : : :o^
lM(NIN0q(M(N<MCOC
■ iMcOTjiincoixno-He^iTKiocot^oooicOTXincot-oooio-Hc
iTj<T)i<^^T)i-^^mmmmmu3mmincococococococot^t*i
ill^ll Um ^lll ^> Is III iln1ii|f^ii > ilMlrsll i
2404
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
•prad siganag .s^iaaAi on
§ j-^S
g-'SSSK
CCTCClOrHO-.TCOCJ :rH
s'-^
" !
•jsipa: Sni
-pnpni 'sasnadxa i-bjox
$757 48
571 17
228 00
69 43
142 08
133 42
464 94
466 03
52 33
88 30
85 54
139 65
82 72
504 88
104 05
1,132 43
151 25
35 87
347 39
67 00
176 31
276 09
357 74
14 09
^ -jaiiaa IBlox
$427 50
400 00
228 00
12 00
85 00
57 00
195 45
238 00
9 00
72 00
12 00
107 34
33 00
107 65
96 00
62 00
86 00
■■"is'oo
48 00
113 00
156 00
181 00
•sasod
g i :§§ i§g I
; : :2 :g : .8 ;
i : is i5i i is :
j j
8 :
o •
•pwa sq; anting
8 i 188 1 .
2 ; i-i 1 .
J 1
:8 :8 :8 jSS :8 IS
i§ is is i§g is i§
i i
•snBqdJO Sup-Bonpa
: i i
NMiHiM
M
Ii
j9II3a JOj piBj^ ^anoray
1 i i§ : i
: : :o> • :
=88 : i iS : ; i :s i
•siaqioja: JO
J9I19H; loj pi-Bj ^unorav
$242 00
o'oo
331 00
118 00
12 00
48 00
52 00
190 00
228 00
9 00
42 00
12 00
60 00
33 00
36 00
96 00
12 00
36 00
3"00
48 00
53 00
156 00
132 00
•p3A9ii9a -niBj -PIAV -ON
■P9A9119H sjaqiojg: jo on
o i^^OT-oioccooe^co — c-icMcoc^e-i— :rtC^(Mi-t- :
•aSpoT pnBJQ o^ Sana
$17 00
16 68
7 43
24 97
15 55
2 08
8 32
10 81
9 29
9 92
4 20
5 00
10 03
9 97
4 56
16 62
8 41
5 61
5 36
1 45
10 37
4 86
16 97
13 10
25 84
1 82
•eSpoq JO sasnadxa
$329 98
"r66"79
171 17
"""57"43
57 08
76 42
269 49
208 03
43 33
16 30
73 54
32 31
49 72
397 23
8 05
1,070 43
65 25
35 87
329 39
19 00
63 31
120 09
176 74
14 09
•eSpoT JO sidpoay;
$730 35
408 70
572 29
1,107 73
319 15
115 00
435 88
273 42
637 66
318 25
101 18
114 10
200 70
255 36
125 45
332 50
189 00
198 33
118 70
66 90
1,975 44
97 20
339 45
479 20
1,034 57
48 67
•aSpoi aqj JO saoinosaa
$18,505 27
2,600 00
3,545 90
8,204 76
3,453 43
1,323 60
11,490 95
2,555 28
3,268 62
6,641 80
1,074 18
3,187 62
4,062 47
3,804 82
485 42
3,899 45
2,819 60
1,257 41
1,161 00
2,402 96
2,124 18
1,009 50
3,007 63
5,753 11
10,276 83
1,540 13
•sigqmaiv
anxjnqujnoo jo -on
|§rt£2g3|?2SPSS§S«§5??g?S^-^SSgS
•spnmo ISBj
gg3^S25^S§5^g§^2gS^2S^?§Sgg2
•s^^■B^a
^ ::•'"' :
: = : •'^ : : i'^ l"'^ : : •'^ : : :
•snoisrndxg
• ='-' i :: = i ::: = = •;•:• :
•a •<! -N Joj pgddojQ
: :
:^ : :^ : : : : :in-H :t-t~ :
•papuedsng
::::::
: 1
: i'^ •::::: i :: = :
: ■ •
•pajBjsaiaa
1 : i'^ • :
; i : : i'^ : : : :" = ;
• :
•pi-BO Aq nAi-eapqiiAi
: : :^c^ :
• I
^ :
•pj-Bo iSq pajiitnpv
'^ i : : 1 -"^^ : I
: :^ :^ : :^ : :^ : :
1 i
•saoTjoafeH
'^ : i : : i'^ ; i
; = 1 1 i : : : : : : : :
-saop-Biiini
"^ :
•jaqranN
?:j2Sf:SS§S3gSSSsSSg5;S§SSgSSg
i%
rt rt r-( r-l rt rt --l -H -H 1-1 ^ .-1 r-l ^ rl r-1
i
ii
• : i
: : •
Mi
Greensfork
Shannondale
Brownsburg
Selma
Francesville . ...
Wildey
Terrell
Hiawatha
Puritv
Crown Point
Morgantown . ...
Waldron
Greenwood .......
■ = i
II
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
2405
ot-sj^-HcoiMaoc-imoi
•i — I tC in -X O CO TO lO '
TOCOC<IC^t^CCO ;OC^TOmiHOe^
TT to TO CC IM
107 00
293 00
117 00
554 00
274 00
42 00
231 20
153 82
516 00
130 00
54 20
169 90
S3 00
112 00
1 00
40 00
340 00
63 00
122 00
260 00
233 00
138 00
26 00
59 00
253 00
187 50
408 20
214 50
81 65
48 00
88 50
90 00
259 00
69 00
70 00
5 00
30 00
22 10
81 00
17 00
3 00
138 00
24 00
§§
to
§
to
g
o
g
g
8gg
g
lO
^
45 00
180 00
375 "o6
30 00
§
§
§§
§
8
§g
gg
gggg
i
ggg
g
g ;
s 1
i :
1
§ 1 i
S
g
g
gg^g
ss;i-
62 00
108 00
117 00
179 00
224 00
39 00
171 10
114 00
384 00
130 00
33 00
169 90
""ioe'oo
1 00
20 00
300 00
63 00
62 00
260 00
130 00
38 00
26 00
59 00
187 00
102 50
273 75
132 00
47 00
18 00
36 00
45 00
109 00
69 00
70 00
30 00
8 00
61 GO
, 17 00
3 00
123 00
24 00
.'-i::;:TO:::::'Hrt:;:::.tM.-i::.-i^cirt
:::::::
•::•:::
C;00t^C^O-J'a0TOOt0CCt^C<110'^^'1*C;t0<Mt^OtOC:C^tOt01CI^(MOm^^t0t^l0t^C5TOOC^^^
cot^tOt-iiot^'^0'Tft^-j''-H^ioi^T-itoa;t^TO:o^c^ir:!'^OiCoio»-i'^TOC<toocooc^T-<toiCTt<THtooo
lC^C<lt^OtOOmr^OOOCCrHlC'WTOT-HTO»C!MOCC*^ClCOOCOlOOOOtOC-10I^tOt^C^i-t'^IMC^tO'»t
m co-*^ :to
OJ CO 0-. <N en 1
OtO Oi^ c^
lOlCOiOOO'^lOOCNOOOOO
tOTO100TO^COTOTOC<lIr-^001Tf
rtOlC^Oin-rtOOOt-OOOQOlOOOOtOOOOJO
C<l(MOJTj<CCOOCOi-IC^ltOtOCnc-1005100t~OOt--,vHTticO(N
10 0itNQ001CO^mOC<Il01C10'^05CDCOOSOOt^CO-^CCtNNOC^t^lO-t*10'MO'^C5lOOtOT-H«OOCO»C
■*0qi.0TOOOl:^lOO(N'»'1<0103T)<-*-*C0OOTt<C0TH0iC0(M.HTfa0t^rtr)>^OC^i-(rtOl0000>iHt-Tl<
^totci>oo^c^i-(Mt-occo»r-inTOioooc^ii:~cC'^-*Tt<r-t-oooooo-*ooifflTOOtocooir-
^r^OOTOOC<»tOt^TO^TO^t-lOTOT-tCOr-(T}<OCOt^CnTOr^TO-rH^^OOOt^01Ct^TOICOC<IOi0^tO!MtOCC
^ooc^iot-tNOTOtor^otoTOooocNtOT^crs-^TOoc^a^ ^_co 1-i »-H as ^ in_o ^ to o^ ^ to o ic^to '^ t^^c^^
ioin".-rc<rto''TirTO''r-rx'(>f cc" to' evT'S-'co" c^<:^^r-^cc-r^Smci!>^T^i-i(>i'^-'^ »h"(n" ^t^t^ ^"Vr--
^|g§g^K3gS^§^^5S|S^g^££gS^3S^S^5!|?3Sg?!g^§;^^?^^^S
SS2K^gS^g§^gS^S§gg3^giggS5SgSSg;SSSI2S?S?5^S=°S2;~g^
^CN :io^
c^ :::::: :-!
r-.^
: i-H
:
I ; : i
1 = i i • i = • =
i ■ ■ : I : \^ :
^ ■ :
•
:
TOio^ :
^.H<N
TO :^ 1^^ :oicsi
TO^
■■■^
; :
•'^ : • -"^ = :
1
I
:^ :'-'
'^
= : ;
'^ 1
'^ :
'-'
'^ 1
'=■';•!: = = •
cq
:
;
'-'
: •'"
■ ^
\^
\^
'^ = :::'": :
:
TO
-I
^^^
■^
\'^
:
^^
1'-^
:
i
:
:oi.H :
•
'^ ■ :"
■ :
• I
: :
: 1 : • : i'^--'^
•
i"^ :
203
204
205
206
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
217
220
221
222
223
224
225
227
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
250
261
252
253
ItStS"
i^2
: >»o
2406
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
•ptBd siganaa .s^iaaM "ON
^"^
■"^8 i2?§J3^S
:;:J'='
to
§S2^"g? i3§?
^
-pniorii 'sasnadxa i^^ox
1,022 64
233 18
398 16
72 52
228 19
126 00
28 17
263 38
655 38
63 23
233 54
115 75
""74'i9
179 77
186 12
488 36
445 35
212 62
185 57
104 72
334 10
27 32
262 57
774 52
277 29
•piiaa TOOX
8559 95
21 00
.338 05
24 25
149 00
126 00
"'218"5b
121 60
53 00
155 00
102 00
""45'ob
38 00
105 00
279 00
258 25
97 25
136 00
12 00
164 00
""5900
318 00
172 10
•S3S0d
-an J 8iq'BjiiBq3 aaqio
S :§g :g :g§ = :
gg ;sg jg :gg =
SS 1^2 is i^2 i
•pB9(i sqj SnijJjTia
Ig j :g : :8
is ! is 1 is
; ;g
M^
: 1 I jg i jgg
: i i is i iss
•snBqdiQ SnUBonpa
j i
MMMN
i N i M i
:
i ig : :§ i ; = i ;
i : i i i : i
0
s
•saaqiojg jo
8406 00
21 00
228 00
19 25
84 00
96 00
""m"66
99 00
53 00
140 00
102 00
""450b
8 00
80 00
200 00
258 25
56 00
126 00
12 00
124 00
'"53'ob
132 00
134 00
•p3A8tpa -ra^^ -PIAV -ON
-^ :<» il-i: I : I :::::::::::::: :n
■paAajiaa saaqjoia jo -on
'•^c^-ecAmm :t~^T).r~n. : <n (n Tf oo u; to r- <n t- ' fi- to lo
•a3poi pnBaa o^ sana
829 53
14 84
13 36
4 58
10 85
13 54
5 77
15 50
8 82
3 27
14 72
3 73
9 76
13 48
15 58
17 62
7 73
5 32
16 08
1 96
9 77
23 43
7 55
•aSpoi JO sasuedxa:
8462 69
212 18
60 11
48 27
79 19
""28"r7
44 88
533 78
10 23
78 54
13 75
""29 '19
141 77
81 12
209 36
187 10
115 37
49 57
92 72
170 10
27 32
203 57
456 52
105 19
•9Spoi JO s:jdpo9H
81,144 17
356 00
342 07
91 63
290 40
324 94
156 95
989 84
65 40
311 60
136 15
39r"25
202 35
989 35
428 00
352 00
468 10
208 34
106 30
609 74
39 50
328 98
546 50
254 76
aSpoi aq^ jo saajnosaa
84,443 48
3,106 21
4,806 15
1,791 82
8,761 17
6,507 46
1,505 94
4,949 21
9,370 61
780 28
3,952 43
1,681 20
1,550 61
2,426 75
4,076 00
15,550 00
7,586 22
2,308 79
2.179 00
7,277 82
1,590 08
3,419 36
6,376 59
2,340 80
•sjaqniapv
Snunqiajuoo jo -cm
|S|gggg^E:S|g3 :S!$Kg§gggS2SSf2
•spuBio ISBJ
g^^ss^sss;:^:^ ;sS3:ssj!?gS52sg?s?
■s^%^3^a
: -.^ I
: : I • : : : 1 ;
•snoisindxa
:::::.:::.:
: : :'-i : : : : :
•a •J'N-ioj paddoiQ
. :tp^
:::-:: :cot-
•papnadsns
: :
: : : : : i-^ :
: : jT-i : : : : :
•pajTJjsniaa
'^1:1:'^ = :
::--(: :r-( :co :
•pj^O iJq HM-BipmiAV
: :
: I'^iM : :r-( :
rH : : : i^sq^^
•pjBD iCq pawimpv
-* :
.:::;:::
<^ ::::::: iri
•snoTjoafaa
::-'::.::
.-.- :^ -.CA -.^ ■ :
•snoij'Btiini
tocc-H :-*co :^^ :c<i
: .--I-
:oito : :co :co^ :
•jaqniTi^i
rHlOt~00(NC0^10tOt-0000-l(MeCT|llOtOI>«10JO-<M
O
p
s
1
ill
Osgood
Utilis
Hartford City...
Argos
N. Manchester..
Michigan City...
Spiceland
Excelsior
i L
111
i
J
a.
Martinsville
Little River
Alto
CharlottsviUe ...
Robert Blum
Acton
White River
1
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
2407
!2^ =
<lO'*iMC^asC0C0(M'*»O'-it^i-HC
O lO O CO »o
S?i!Si
>oioomiocoi>'U
) 1-1 oo Oi OOO lO<Mt
? (M 05 C- O C^
> Oi 00 CO O :
>tNi0C<I'<J<Oa0OC^li-HOC<lC000O^"#C^rHC0t^-1<i-'i--IOOC0^-O'^O0000O'^0:OO'*O(>ir-tpCC
iCvir-OOOr^-fOC^lOOC^llOWCDOl'rfOCOC'lOOT-lO -^CS»OaiCOCOGOCOl--CO <X>'tDOiOiQ:>T^G:>-r-*-
199 00
78 00
155 00
81 40
24 00
140 00
193 70
sbo
16 00
33 00
57 00
138 60
57 00
52 00
§
8§
g
28 00
52 00
8 00
44 00
""q85"32
8§§
i
2
§§
too
§
i
9 00
21 64
65 00
204 00
234 00
4 00
83 00
§g
§§
o
i° \
i i i
ij
i i i i iS? : iS
! : i i i^ i Is
§
\ \
: : :
g
s is
§§ :
sg i
: : :
:
III
liliii
: :
«n
§ 1 l§° 1
: :
: i :
: : :
: =
i-
i 1 ! i i§ i i
I i
• : I
1
i :8
;M
:;§::§ i i : i :§: i
iS
i : \
105 00
60 00
68 00
71 00
24 00
80 00
152 00
s'oo
16 00
33 00
57 00
138 60
32 00
48 00
15 00
97 00
109 50
30 00
12 00
51 00
116 50
28 00
12 00
8 00
44 00
52 00
24 00
140 00
122 00
26 00
160 00
184 00
9 00
12 00
65 00
J 49 00
234 00
4 00
08 00
116 00
33 00
: :c^ : 1 ::::::: I :::: i-i ::::::: I"-! :::::: I i'^ ;: i:;: I
jc^io :-
C^'l
m :o
^^'^
hur
to cow
StCHrtMIOOO .COCr
CO
JXMtOtOCOtOI-lOOrHt
iC00100lO.-IOrtt^lOl003I>rt<«5T-Hi-ICOC<H>05r-T)l-
1 t^ T-H C<J CO O CO lO
iOica^icocot^iOT-ic5c
) O (N C- O O
O TJ. O) <M CO C
oc^ COO) ait-
t-i-l O^ CO Tl<
• rt in CO (M lo c-i t
scoocoocoococoo
coococococoooi>coor-'^cooc-t
i-ioojcocoint^oooMOcnonoocic
> T-H r- 00 -01 o
cqr-.-icocococ>ioaiiooNOt
Tf»cait-i:-r-<-^oir:)co(Mcnir5c
(NC^^t-lT-icO-^COCOOlOCOOC
ofiNco'co'corH CO c^eim t^i
>(M100C-l.-(350l/
gs^ss
s
SS^S
S^?:
^KSc^g
gssggs
sss
»
^SKSSSSS
?3SSS
ssss
s:§3ss^
2
^
°^^
S2S
sg??ss
?3Sa^2^
;:^Sg
§SSg?2SS2
ssssss
g3gj
" :
" : -.o)^
1
i
■
: I
:
'-' :
-^
^ :"
i : :
^ i
i :
:
^
: :
:
1 ■ :
i'^ ;
: 1 i • : 1"
• • : = :
• = = :
• : : ; i = :
1 = 1 : = : i :
: = 1
" :
TK
j-<<N
T)H
■
:>o^
'-I . :
^ ■ I i 1 : i
: :^
•
= = : 1 =
i : 1 :
• ; • : 1 : i
• = : ;
. : : :iM : :
•
: ; : :
•'"' :
i'^
: :
•-'
•
■■^
<M : :
: : : :^
1 i =•:
:<M : i jrH,-.
= '-' :
•^
•^ : : i
" 1 1
;••■:''
^
= ^ ;
; 1"
^ :
• l'^ 1
: i i
: : :
^
^ : : : :
:::::::
^
: l^
: : :
r^e^c^ : : ; :
CONCO
"*
:co :
i :
c^co
CO :
CN
-'
^ :
COrt^
:co :
5S^^
§ g>.S ^ « o J
! B S5-5;S --ssj g^«;^ s « s s s g'^'-g ii||:^ s s, J a
2408
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
•prej s^ganea .n^^/A 'ON
-r^
- i^S'^- :;2j5nSI2°^^25!^*'^
•jOTjaH 3nt
»51 00
69 30
133 96
201 75
53 80
82 5G
219 39
171 97
297 67
452 22
118 87
83 59
354 94
62 61
427 22
119 86
204 05
51 00
176 18
120 45
192 63
115 33
59 91
76 63
•jaiiaa wox
§§§§§ggS§g§S§§§§l28§S§g8§ ig
-jna aiq'BjTJBqo iaq:>o
; i§ i i
is-" jg ! i
MM
: M M
i 18 jg
•pBaci sqi Sni^jng
is-ii
^ :
75 CO
25 00
40 00
'Ho'bo
"so'oo
8 1:8
M
: :
•suBqdio SniiBonpa
M : 1 i
j 1
: j
: : i
: ^
I :
■saniufB^ paMopTAV JO
jajiay: aoj piB^j janoniv
i N N
• -^ i
: =8 : i i
In!
j :
•siaqjojg jo
J8T[9H: JOj piBj ^nnouiv
»21 00
36 00
10 00
10 60
18 00
24 00
64 00
64 50
""45'bo
9b 00
43 00
78 00
60 00
112 15
8 00
56 00
40 00
101 00
68 00
12 00
8 00
•paAaioa -mvi -pTAV "ON
: : : ; : : =^ : : = ="^ : ■ 1 = i = i : : : : 1 =
•paAaTiaa: siaqiojg jo -om
CO :(M,-.^^ icocOTC :.oco(N^corr^ :.ococ^(N^ : :
•aSpoq pHBiQ 01 Sana
84 44
3 91
5 55
13 46
7 11
8 78
11 90
8 77
13 18
10 97
8 61
9 20
8 20
12 64
9 12
6 63
9 75
3 73
9 83
5 55
8 64
6 50
10 10
4 03
4 72
■aSpo^ JO sagaadxg;
830 00
18 30
68 96
191 15
35 80
12 26
205 39
102 82
158 67
342 72
78 87
38 59
178 94
19 61
349 22
29 80
91 10
18 00
120 18
80 45
46 63
47 33
47 9f
63 63
•aSpoq JO sjdiaoaa
S88 70
90 25
111 10
297 25
142 30
184 44
232 00
192 10
483 99
438 94
344 50
254 15
394 90
325 94
238 89
132 60
214 80
186 70
201 15
115 20
111 00
303 79
130 60
278 64
80 60
94 40
•aSpoi Q^% JO saoinosay;
8747 35
2,735 16
1,380 00
1,574 00
462 33
3,007 62
1,533 68
6,834 25
5,342 56
415 56
2,025 65
6,894 37
1,834 29
1,652 82
1,541 10
1,236 29
735 48
4,464 18
1,660 05
1,698 74
2,778 26
821 70
3,574 00
543 95
1,120 99
•sjaqraaj^
Sui;nqtJinoo jo -om
gS^gSSS^SSSSS^ig^SggiS'^SSSgjg
•spn^aO iSBj
SSS=--2S§iS§S!53?3S;32S;^SS^?5SSSSg5
•sqiTOa
= : : =
•snoisrndxg:
: : •: I :
• : : : : -"^ : I : ; : : • : :
: : : :
•a 'd 'N Joj paddoja
<Nr-l ;OC^
: :io .rtoo ;inw . : -.^ ; -.i^
:"="• =
•papnadsng
: = = 1 :
: ■ \ :^ ■ •
•;:• = :::
•pa^Bjsaiaa
: : : : :
: -.^ :
: :
: : :rH :ti. : :rt -„r-: :
■pivct Xq nAi-wpqiiAi
'-' = :: =
" ■
; : : : i = 1 : ^'^ I 1 :
•pa-80 Aq pa;iiuipv
■^ : :
^ :
1 i : •'^ I ; : i'^^ : :
•snoT^oaCaa;
1^ 1 !
l-^
= i 1 = ;■::;: = ; :
•saoTiBjiini
•jaqtanN
iiiiiiiii^lssiiiiii'iiiiiii
LODGES.
Grant
Alma
McCordsville ...
Kingman
Loogootee
5P4CO
5 Es
1^1
111
M
iili
Whitestown
Amant
Coatsville
Nereis
Mulberry
:'9
iS
ii
i
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
2409
~gg
M
:S jS j i :^
?
WOOL- I,
Ol
"•^ ;: S ^
" i'~
'" '-^ '^ Z
•^=°2K??
~
-
X
"S :g
86 68
113 00
710 01
63 84
106 90
47 49
225 97
■■■■23'97
•19 75
108 00
236 73
30 62
199 95
20 00
85 90
37 12
172 42
65 05
158 80
77 06
1,003 45
163 15
221 44
209 67
88 96
106 07
150 63
43 91
73 17
232 16
182 19
250 97
116 00
98 10
82 00
164 89
91 67
257 68
5 00
582 76
150 28
27 00
113 00
300 00
13 00
66 00
■■■■■-■-
29 75
130 00
"ios'oo
140 00
12 00
09 00
20 00
72 20
18 60
33 40
44 00
75 00
50 00
12 00
87 45
. 24 00
72 20
118 63
27 00
32 00
105 00
164 00
174 25
95 00
45 00
82 00
32 00
38 00
142 00
'"384"o6
12 00
5 1
lO I
iSg j : : j
g i : ;§8? : :
I i
■: ;§f§ 1 =g ;^ ;
1:2 i is§ j" i
g : j8
§ i ii§
;8
i
i : :g : : ;g
M h M !»
! i i
1 F i i§
i is I Is
: l§ i§ i
i -g Ik j
g
ig:g
is Is
N
i
M M : M
Mi
\ \
• :*:
INI
\\\
ei f-? __
00 09
00 e
00 01
00 01
g : : ig
g ; : :S
\ \
\\\
g j i ;
g
\ \ i
12 00
98 00
290 00
8 00
16 00
■■■'84"00
"■i24"o6
""Woo
100 00
12 00
90 00
20 00
21 00
6 00
32 00
44 00
75 00
50 00
12 00
87 45
24 00
32 00
118 00
16 00
32 00
40 00
164 00
08 00
95 00
45 00
50 00
32 00
12 00
82 00
12 00
"::~:::~':::::":::'^'::::::::::::'^:::::::::::::
S 49
10 15
17 80
3 50
3 00
1 43
4 87
2 22
2 57
13 15
5 66
10 20
6 11
2 42
3 11
4 44
5 46
6 69
2 08
10 05
5 35
6 82
8 22
9 24
6 35
9 70
4 35
3 94
3 32
G 40
7 00
10 64
0 18
3 47
7 99
14 07
7 18
2 28
23 10
6 18
fSSg ;gg§gg§i§25?3gf:gSS22?;g2
§«g ;22|Sg^5||S33??25S2ie?;g
H"n'"S2
104 70
•235 75
574 70
70 15
60 05
296"06
28 60
221 62
"'.""333"69
49 50
51 55
328 55
126 45
235 10
122 30
213 09
62 35
88 95
109 70
295 12
41 60
322 10
308 35
210 72
220 97
214 70
159 50
• -261 15
87 10
98 90
76 50
231 90
217 32
212 80
183 70
69 40
22(i 90
285 47
469 30
45 50
610 67
176 16
2,559 75
5,824 40
4,059 86
2,208 69
2,964 14
■■■2'619"44
652 69
1,859 86
""l,532"05
560 60
040 00
1,819 31
1,156 57
3,183 64
1,615 18
1,247 38
771 03
2,039 75
2,004 12
2,264 75
339 85
2,956 20
810 20
2,617 53
2,038 08
2,520 92
3,454 49
2,782 '23
1.317 34
1,452 71
302 88
1,411 14
790 94
090 00
10,465 20
800 65
2.318 94
1,88G '27
1,989 71
475 00
1,474 02
5,103 81
SSgg^ 1^=:^ :-^gS?i:5S5S?5^5!K2gSgg3^SSgS^gggSg5Si§S2S
?;§§^ : :S=^S i222c5S^g5S5 :=°S?g2S2JS5?5§SS2§SS§gig-§iSS-s?i
;:•:::= i : 1 1 1" ::•::••= =
■ •" ■ \ ■ : • ■ ■ ■'^ i --^
:^ :co
:::::::::!:■::::•:::::
•'^ ::•:•::::: I : :
: ; ■.'^
<N : :co
: : 1 ; = I 1 : : = : = ; ; ; ; 1 1 1 : ; i
:•:••;• =^ ::• :"^"^ :::::• :
::"':"' i" :::: ■'^ : 1
: : -.''
: i- •'^ : = : 1 : ! :^^ i^ : " = 1 •
1 ;; = ="; f : = 1 ■-^'- ■."" ■ \ • i
; • 1 : = i = 1 = • = i 1-"" :''!;;":
: : 1 ; ! 1 i ; • ; i- ! = ■ 1 ; 1-
; i ; : ■ = r : • = : ; 1 = : •- I i ; ! :
; =•:: = ; = :- i--^ :;.;•:
■:'^<^ i" i^ ! : : :--T«c-.^^- .;-
jcc«e
■ r-t^r^ooaooooocooocoooososoasaiOiCsoooo
So30>oooSoooo.-cS2S2i
6og i" a ^
2410
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
•piBjs^yoaDa.sJiaaAV "ox
^?;2
i"^"
I""
./
i^-
'^"'Z" • 2 '.3
^^
1:: ■ • S
-pnpni 'sasaadxa ibjox
$101 13
116 71
146 88
203 00
41 72
572 70
21 20
20 71
112 67
58 96
61 20
101 90
187 14
125 66
41 48
83 22
43 20
13 68
98 68
106 25
145 57
105 92
136 67
23 93
260 69
•janan wox
00 to I
00 6
00 t6
00 t
00 8
66 99
00 Oi
00 9S
00 Sf
00 t
05 18
06 811
00 8
OS 9t
00 OS
00 98
00 8
00 60S
00 S8
OS 811
8i 86
00 988
•sasod
NJM
1 1
:gg i § : :
§ : i
o: : :
•p-Baa aqi Sni^ng
1111
j i
§
1 i = i :§
i ! i i ;5
Hi
•saBqdJO aaWBOnpa
il
M
1- i
i M il 1
::■::•
•saiiiniBj paMopTAi Jo
: i
j \
i
i ; i : : :S i
•sjamojg JO
jati9H 10} piBj ^nnoiuv
00 toi
00 6
00 68
00 t
00 8
00 09
oq__ot___
00 SI
00 St
00 t
00 se
00 801
00 8
00 S8
00 98
008
00 eos
00 S8 _
00 to
00 96
00 988
■poAaiiaH •ni'Bj -ptM "ON
■p3Aaii9a; siamojg jo -on
: : = : I i : : : 1 : : : : i : i 1 •'^ i i : 1 :
■aSpoq pn-BJO o; sana
J6 99
4 42
9 42
9 91
2 54
9 34
1 77
5 33
5 24
4 33
3 11
6 65
16 75
13 18
3 24
8 26
3 34
3 93
4 68
5 65
7 14
5 58
6 18
1 56
4 36
-aSpoi JO sasnadxa
$65 13
17 93
33 38
203 00
9 72
367 70
21 20
17 71
76 67
38 96
15 00
93 90
68 24
44 16
37 48
41 22
17 20
13 68
28 68
39 30
142 57
101 92
42 67
14 93
156 69
•aSpoq JO sjdiaoaa
8175 85
88 50
203 95
278 20
76 79
599 60
35 40
126 30
143 25
115 85
66 40
132 95
552 20
317 22
107 55
165 33
88 35
78 45
112 00
325 95
142 92
111 75
143 00
32 20
330 70
oSpoi aqi JO saoinosan
$2,305 58
3,241 29
1,107 56
4,906 00
1,083 71
1,745 19
825 00
2,225 06
1,847 10
2,593 43
1,595 26
805 77
5,246 73
1,657 82
1,302 28
2,001 93
1,216 96
1,893 19
1,850 18
1,876 88
461 82
1,615 23
1,031 29
1,525 95
1,886 75
•saaqiuaw
SuTinquanoo jo -o^
3S§S2f221g?g^S|SSSi^SS5gS^S??
•spuBio %9Vi
S?5S^^§2S§22;::;S§SJg3='?5g5SS!2SS2
•sqi^aa
.::::: :^ ::::: :
•snoisrndxa
::::::::::
::::->::: :-^ :.:: :
•a 'J "N JOj paddoia
:^«:mTP<N :<Nrt :
:-i"o : : : : :-H t^^ :<n
■papnadsns
::::::::::
::::::::
:
: :r^
•paj'B;saiaH
: :co : :^^ : -.^
T^-H ::::«:
:
: : :
•pjBO Xq uAi-BipqjiM
: 1 • i-^' : :- ■
•-' = :: 1^ :
,-,
T-i ; :
•pjBD Xq pawiuipv
; : : -H : -^ : : "-^ :
::::>-';::
: -^ -H : :
•snonoaCaa
: :-"^ :.:::: -H ::: : : :
:- : : ;
•saoTi-Biimi
: :c^-i- :-t- : : :^ :«-p-^ : :<noo :
■>>::::
•jaqraiiN
l^illliiiiillSISIIISflsss
i
lit
i
II
u
Stockwell
Fisher
Star City
Mauckport
Flat Rock._
Atlanta
MilltAwn..
§1
ill
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
2411
rH rt r-^ . C-J C>) C-
) •* -o M e-) to :
[ic^tC(M01lO«OOOOOTf<(M0 10ira(
'P2aS'-=!»5S
5^s?^S?.t:Ss
.-• o C' t r- -1' o :
ioc5t^ooriicor~tcoscociict^^-^if:)i-iu:)t^r^c^-^rHoa;^oo:)cr. {^^cooal(Mcocoxcc■(^l'^3-i*^oc':
'«010(MC-. (M010-*OOaOrttcc^T)<(MOOCO-)ilO-1<-f?-:00(Min«COl0 10 0 00.^^t£«tO-.OT1<C'
119 50
8 75
44 00
19 00
246 60
97 00
260 00
48 75
273 80
14 25
96 20
30 00
274 00
122 25
84 00
40 31
'"Isi'oo
147 75
111 00
21 00
4 00
24 00
16 00
33 00
70 90
44 00
104 00
44 00
""32"00
35 00
75 00
13 00
18 00
92 00
47 00
"""i.V'oo
19 00
77 00
8 : i i i
128S
fo 1
i8;e
\ \
: 188 i
i i^^ i
i i
8 188 1
i i
25 00
15 00
55 30
25 00
50 00
45 00
30 00
30 00
110 00
■30 66
40 00
1
§ i 1
18
30 00
"so'oo
15 00
\\Z\
N
MM
i j
18 i
f. i
\ \
I 1
» Mi
i i
:■* :
iiQ :
18
\ :
: :8
s'oo
'"ss'oo
60 00
8 :
00 :
""44"()0
4"o6
191 30
52 00
210 00
""eo'oo
6 00
96 20
■"liy'oo
■""92"2'5
44 00
33 00
"""ge'oo
141 00
81 00
21 00
4 00
24 00
16 00
18 00
15 00
8 00
104 00
9 00
'""32''o6
8 188 ;888
I 1 i : : • 1 : : i'^ 1 : = : : : : : :^«' i 1 : I I i-^ = l'^ : ^^ "^ = 1 f i : i = =
l"^ : ■.'■
m^a
;-*(N>r
J'*
cr
■*
cr
Tf^-*
^co-
^c
:^(N
:c-,cM :
0'^tO<M<MC^CClO'TC
' 'X* 00 O o 10 C
lO O 10 O -* Oi O
g8§S?S?g8i§58SI5?3§g8SSSSgggS8S;: i i^^SSSJ
io^-^Tt*o^r-t^^cCit^u^t^cDTticoooioiot^(Mioooo^or^r^
ooeomcoooooc^c-jcooqtocoo-. 'j'c^co.-HTtitoici^C'jcoioc-iio
JlOlOl-OlOOlCOlCOinOO-^lO-l-O^JOOOOlOOOOO^OCOOOOlO^lOOOIMtOOOOl
40'^C^lCWOOCOt-OC^Tf^(MO'^(M05lOCOCC(Nt^OlOCS-*'*rtlO^OC<»'^COC<ICDtMt^COC-l^t
jo-.-(io>-icoooa50-*0'i'c^o--Hioio(N05tOT)icoo>t^tot-too^ooooaooio^i-uor--Ttiom-o'<:
)OOtOe005t~rt5DOOtOaOt~M«10-*05 50 10--HMOai00100<M(NO!05t~50tOIMeCOOOCO-*t-000
)-^t^00O0SC000-i'aa'^0000O(NC0C0'«*'^'^^T-HC0t*O»0'^OC0t^«0C0T-ll0t^O00OCM'^0SC0OC0
30(Nioo5tsio«t~ocoo5!Ocot~-*iooi-iice«oico>oiM-*otoO'-i,He<io-iior~oaicoioCTjio-*
^oD-l^o<£>c^l■g'"^^0'^^^o•^lOt^or-co•-Ht^cO(^^t^osot£'ccoco■r1*^:3ooc5t^t^oooot^(^^lO^-t^^lC
JCSClOCCOCiOO'^COCCOSCSltCl 0_CC O 05 OS IM^OS^I^^OO C^ OJ t^ 10 5D O^t- COCOt^Ot^OOOSCO O^Ol^i-H^CC C-l^OS
J'Mt*WC<lU5lO(>lC<imi0IMO0iO10Oi-Hr^0S-^0P0SiHi-Ht0'^C0(MOl0O«0O«000100S'M0S00aD?£>'^
JTl-COe-ll:~(Mt~0"OCOt^t~lOC010.-iCOCO«lO-*-^lMC-OC^10tOTrC010COC^COT((^Tj.rt0 10CO^(MCO
SOOeOOSlCGOOSOOOt^i-HCO'^COt^CO^t^C^-^O'^lO
cqGOi---*^-*o>K50>aoio.-ic
I ^ e-j e^ (N i-H ^ WM ^^
^ : :w^^
['^
^^ :
• =^ 1 ;
:
'^
1^ 1 :
:'-
: :
:
: ;
: :^ = :
: : : :
;
^^
ccc^
"'"*m'~ :^
"^
^ :rtc-i
CO :
lOM
^
:
: :
: : :
1
•: •
1 •
:
• :
:
.
I-^
'- :
^rH
^^^
^ :
\^
'-'
-^ :
:-"
-^ i
: : :
:
: :
1 :
^
:
^
I'-'
" :
I : I
: : •'"
1
•
:
^^
u,^.H^t--H :^e^ :o
:o= :ti-^(n :^ :
^
'"
wo
■^
i5ggSS||S|C|S5g.^KS5^g|^^|S||||5S^||S|SS|S§|g
ng Station..
mfield
higan
ghurst
a
1^
a =3
in
s
1
: a
'1=
i
F
h
"c
,
Mile
kport
dinsburg
ningStar
t Red.
lli
1
t^3§ffli2SmMMP^<BOW(a!BtB>S)S«!i§M^3MMm<!o«(Sin3Wwfe(2m«w!B(2
2412
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
piBd sjyanaa .s-j^iidj^ -ox
^" i i i^~
"-
"=2 2^'
: -2 :2
-rojic -.^
'-j; :S
inuani 'sasaadxg; iBiox
J44 70
64 05
35 05
175 07
90 08
159 00
48 33
99 50
412 20
85 45
320 20
90 44
107 23
110 08
317 82
4(; 78
64 00
203 81
154 46
198 17
226 95
217 61
86 75
15 00
424 76
-j9j[aH Wox
»12 00
(IS 00
69 00
34 20
81 .50
130 .50
31 25
19 00
■■■"ig'oo
83 00
8 75
40 00
36 00
91 00
116 06
15 00
48 00
53 00
71 00
6 00
79 00
■sasod
1 : :g :
: : io :
iS i : i§ IS
52 i i3 !■"
: 1 IS
: : i^oi
! i :
\
•p^aa ^m SniXjna
nniii
m
is i i
ggg :
S i 1
s i i
•snBqdjQ 3un«onpa
i i : : i
1
ininn
i ■ : :
i I : i
H!
\
satiiniB^ paAvopTAi Jo
g i i i iggg i ig i :gt2
* i i i i-*^^ \ T \ ;""
i iS :
•sjeqjoja JO
00 (U
00 t
00 li
00 8S
00 8t
00 01
00 G9
00 It
00 91
00 Ot
00 9i___
00 6
SS 18
00 S9
00 81
00 is
00 ts
00 89
00 98
•paAan.^>I •raT?,^: -piM -on
-•if: -"'-^ : : .'- : --^ : ■ : ;=^ : • : 1 1 • i
•paAaii'^H saaqiojg jo 'ON
r-, : : :-c-0Mio^e.i<N : :c^ :^ -- i,o «--ccco(n :x :
33poT poBJO 01 sana
87 21
3 30
3 59
11 85
4 10
() 55
2 93
8 92
9 80
(> 80
5 60
4 16
9 86
4 04
2 70
3 32
10 02
11 10
10 58
12 43
10 03
8 35
2 42
4 75
CO
■aSpoT JO saauadxa
832 70
64 05
35 05
113 07
22 08
90 00
14 13
18 00
281 70
54 29
301 20
90 44
58 23
27 08
309 07
6 78
28 00
112 81
38 40
183 17
178 95
164 61
15 75
9 00
aSpoi JO s^diaoa^j
8197 35
99 00
sa 70
237 05
132 09
131 50
515 35
220 07
319 10
151 77
222 40
83 44
197 31
132 40
399 09
66 39
213 75
531 07
211 65
321 89
200 70
167 10
48 40
101 31
613 80
76 41
s»apoT: aq; JO saomosaH
$1,412 57
1,561 51
610 00
2,636 61
1,570 08
842 17
1,229 01
1,880 71
2,722 86
865 96
4,164 15
1,352 66
4.202 90
1,078 15
639 45
1,135 00
2,015 56
3,862 17
2,443 81
2,127 98
1,491 28
1,770 79
1,164 99
1,015 45
7,278 32
1,842 73
•sjaqraayj
SnnnqTjjnoo jo "Om
^?^SS?§i§?2^SEl3Si;^Sf:^g3?gS;;|«
•spuwoiSBd , =*£«=-2;:2:;S23gS2SSaSSffl5SJSJ5a^SH2SS
•sqma 1 : : : 1 :" 1
;'-'-' :
. . : : :
•snoiSfndxa | :::.:::
: ; : :
: : : : :
•a -J -N JOJ paddOKI , ; :^«>c : :
-.5 1- :-i-«..ro : :
^ :<M=;- ■;
papnadsns
-:::::::
: : : :
: : : : :
■paj-BjsataH
:::'-:—::
: : . : :
■paBo :£q nMBjpqjiM
: i i ; : : i
:--:::::;
^-H :-
-H : :w :
•pjBO Iq paWtrapv | :::::::
: : : : .-^ i-H
. : : :
. : ." :
•suoijoaCaH \ -. ■. -. . ■.'^ -.
: : :oi . . ; .
::::-::.:;
•suouBijinj
1- :-Hoi .- :
.:;■ .^^oioi- ; „ ci -- - lo LOCI :-,o :
•jaqtatiM
-NCOTTlOeCt-
gggggsSiiiissgiigii
lOiOOOlOlOlO
LODGES.
Augutta
Fountain
Bowling Green..
Freedom
Claypool
Bloomingsburg.
Windsor
i is?
ic|i
III!
! • : i
.g" : : cj
2 :— O
>iJll'
I"! M
ill
a c3 a £
i
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
2413
o : : 05
§^g£
g?3§gf25
.•^2K§2^g^gSg§S35£S
S§^.SJ
^§§5Sg§
gsss
31
Sg^S^^gSJ
^?3§2S!§?5f?|§=^giI^|||^SS
-|o|-^g--
^SSK
s?
:?
ig5§^ i
igggggggggggggggg
sgg?
igSS^gg
gg ig
'■S%
i^
:^2si? ;
;g:5g22|S=^S§§^S¥§s^
-Sgf
•
3^ is
g?
i?
:
: =25 ;
1 :
:
: : : :
gg
S i
: : :
g
:g
-HCJ
•a
i :§ i
0-*
'^ :
'^
•CO
;g
;
g ;§ 1
: :
gg : : :gg
g
g
•ggg
g :g
;
= g
f-
is
2 is
1 :
-4
4-
s?
; 1 :^^
-
^
-
?
;!2i!;
£
-
;^
-p
-H
11
-j-
ii
-4
-
i i?
•
1-
-g
:;::
-
-
is
-
i :g
-
: :;^i
-
-f
4-|
i"
i " ■ :
• 1 (M <M
:^ : : : :
§s
i IS
• :-2
M
§i
i:
= §§§§ :
igggg =gggg :gggggg
igg:?
iggg^^gg
gg :g
•3^
il
rccrfcDO :
\^^B^ I'S^^s i^s^^sssss
:°'r?^
;^?2|"S§
3g :2
i'^ : : i 1
= J'^'-' •:::::•; = •'^<=~'
• :"
• :'^'-' : : :
-t-
:"-
:^^„„ :
:rf-M^M :CO-^TH^ :<MN(N<MC^(N
:rH«5M :(M^t-^-H«
:c-i :rH
§!;
S?
SgggigK
t-
fl!2t2g§-gS^§E^?S§2SSg
S^§2
S§g5S'-§5?S
12 gig 12
l^co
-^S
m oo I" ri CO -H
^iot~(Nio-i<cocOTticoco«t^ooooicir
!M lO O tr
^C^GCM-JOCO^
coe^co^
3g
§i
SS3ggS5
§
S2S i2Sg
^ :gg§S3^
ir
:gg?
^SSSlt :g
gSS2
'S
^1
ssggss^
^
""k i§"
^ ;2Sg|SS
Tf
\U^^
S^SSS'" :S
§2£g
ICllOOOt~C001"OOOOOt~Ot~1010COOOOOCOi00 10C»010COOmTl<OOC<10'MOOOO-
iO'Mcct~oconH(Mt--sit~o(»ooi-it~-t<<»oco-t<-:J>05CO(Mc-icoe^coiot^-*t~cocooioiof--i^;oc
'!C'Ojior--*iooo^'Oioo«mo-fQccot~iNco-Ht-(rH-HC3in.-HOoortO:j'3't-i-i050r~oKScDq>50
■MtH^MC-. 0V-(O«I:~t^iMTfC-. COci5t~MlOOI:--10CO.-H«0 1CCC-H«<:Ort<io>-ICOt-C5COO^!OCOOC
■^00'OO500C0THT-l-^CDO5IOIM(M00asCOCO'^CO — Oi-HODOi^Q-tO^OOCOOOl^CIOO^CSCp-^COtOC'INri
McSincOrttCOOOva5rtCO-H(Mf-lC-l-*t-050Jt--Te-IOOTt<r^^CMMCOINC0050)OilCt-COaiCOCT-. OlJJCl
i~c«cc-i>o«oa6ir~co«(>iinicocJioi:-t---cc«.-flOJoocococcmt~c-ioo«-ioiai.Hcci»coo>if:iin-H«^iar)
= = •:!; = = •
1 :
-'
^^
; ■ ; : :
-H :c^rt
:!'-'•:••
• • i :
1 ; : : i : = • =
1 : : ! :
1 ; :
•"
= • : :
^ ■
"
•^ : : :
: •
■ ■
:
■ : : i"^
: : :
: .
: : : .
:
'-
• : ■
-^ .
'^
: I- :-
■ •
:
:
l^-H
• : : f^
1-"
'^ : : •
^ :-,
; :
':" ■ i
i-^ = ; 1
- i-H-i
• : i •
:
•
■ : : :
:-^-^ : • : :
-^
22 ■<^'^'^'=^
•-"^ i
TJ.
^ : ;^„^^ : :_^^m .^„ ; jt- .
-^
-^
i«)-*in«ot-oooOrtiM«T)<mcoir~ooo5>-imTiiiotot-oocno.
S i32|*aa.S:2 -J iaig i J
So
I p ^
2414
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
■piBj sjyonog .s^ioaAV 'ox
^
c-i :c-
""
"^ :"*=:?
'"
i^
i i"
I iS2 i ;:;"'?i
■pupni 'sosaadxy; ^ox
8313 96
63 30
221 31
56 76
65 77
126 99
66 93
51 20
447 75
887 26
225 58
85 71
102 91
245 00
143 53
78 (0
50 77
146 98
104 00
165 58
"'l69"82
301 80
10 15
393 58
■jai[3H TOOX
00 221
00 9
00 on
00 f 2
00 8f
00 fOI
00 901
00 86
06 I
00 02
02 62
8f 9i
62 6f8
66 6f
00 91
iO i2
00 61
00 i
00 9i
00 12
06 822«
•sasod
-inj aiquiUBqo jaq^o
: ! i ;s§ is i i
M M M M i
•pBea aqi SniJCang
s i i
NN
g i
1 i : 1 ! i : :§
: ! i i i ! i is
•BUBqdJo Sni^'Bonpa
MM
1 I
• \ : ■ \ • I \ :
•saiiiniBj poAvopiAV JO
jojiaH JOi piBj ;unoaiv
§ : i
U : i
i i ;S
n :
oi :
■sjgqiojg jo
00 26
00 9
00 on
OOfo
00 8f
00 fOl
00 901
00 86
00 01
02 62
00 12
00 992
00 ff
00 91
iO i2
00 61
00 i
00 16
00 9
00 f9$
•paAOTian sjsqioia jo -on
^> : : : : . : <m .-.::•:.:::::.: :
tc^i :-coe^ :<Mt^c-i :^ : :•.; : : :" : :3'-'«
aSpoq pnBJO oi sana
2
i
4 99
15 20
3 .52
6 88
6 63
2 49
2 92
13 37
16 05
13 63
4 52
4 62
6 05
3 55
5 41
2 76
4 23
11 55
4 51
4 02
4 78
2 58
14 73
•83poi }o sasuadxa
42 30
145 31
49 76
46 77
99 92
66 93
35 20
397 76
149 15
60 51
82 91
95 00
143 53
25 00
50 77
40 98
■■■■'85"82
191 80
4 15
271 58
•agpoi JO s^diaoaH
S317 10
99 90
366 66
100 40
169 60
169 63
49 80
95 39
006 57
677 95
272 60
65 39
102 60
161 00
82 28
108 35
88 50
174 80
259 50
229 02
104 20
80 40
264 35
59 50
294 60
aSpoi aq; jo saojnosaa
S3,018 .19
4,588 46
2,928 07
668 30
2.142 S3
1,355 47
706 72
793 54
3,331 82
3,936 74
907 30
401 31
1,524 28
1,190 55
500 00
671 72
877 33
1,274 64
542 35
2,183 36
433 00
843 44
1,056 74
316 20
3,801 87
•sjaqniaw
3nTinqxj;noo jo -ok
r.;^Sc^ig:;?§?5|sig§:s^s^??;?g^^ss??&
■spnviQ iSBd
?
;:i2 2?:{?5?j^2:;^',::;;2?;5"2:22^'"S3223
•sqi^aa
; = i ; i-"^
: : = i : ; : : : i --^
■snois[ndx3
: : : .
:::::::
:::::::::"::
•a d N m paddoja
N-H : :
: ;«.^iO :«
:co« : : : : -M oi ?i ; .
•papuadsns
;:.:::::::;
•paiBjsaiay:
; :«>-'
:--:::.:
..:::::.:.::
•pjBO ^q nMBjpqjiAi
c,,fj-. ,„ . . . .^c., /■
i-H : : : : : ;-H : :r-
■paBO Xq pawirapv
-::-::-:: :c-.<M
-^ :-.;:: :^ :;: :
•snoTioaCan
:::;:;.:: i-H :«.-:: ; : ; : ; ;
•saow-Biimi
•laqran^
iilgiiliiiiiiiii
o-H«eoTrw«,ooo>
«otccocoto«otototo
LODGES.
c
1
1
>
Olive
Orion
Green Oak
Calumet
S
>
2^c
Sc
N. Madison....
Springtown
Colfal
Manchester
Mt. Ayr
Comet
Oriole
Leiter's Ford...
South Milford...
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
2415
(M ■ p- -1. QO 'JD t- O
3 C^ -t CO C<l -^ CTJ Ci 1
iO'roc^ooc^OirtiMO-HOo>^cooorH^otoot~Oi-imo jt^cNotor-ooootoot-iSioMOO
CO<»T-1COOO!0200C5U7!N— l«rt-fOIN10C005C0<Me^<NOt~10O rcOrtCOCiinrtOt^CO-Hr-COmpiC
56 00
203 00
21 00
30 50
'""i'J'oo
193 70
86 27
81 00
15 00
33 00
" "30'TO
193 45
23 25
■""55"6o
15 00
136 00
27 00
60 00
253 50
51 00
80 00
72 00
48 00
81 00
30 00
""Woo
'""ss'oo
125 00
139 00
95 50
32 00
6 00
92 85
75 00
36 00
52 00
129 33
76 00
15 00
gg :§ 1
g
§
MP!
g i
i
nnKnMsnisn
\ \
g
60 00
15 00
15 00
;;;;;;;;;
■■so^oo
i i
M M Ms M M
i i^JS : :
\ \
iiiii
1 I
i i
i
MMMMiM
: : :
: • :
g 1 :g I
i
i : : i 1
: :
jmjmm
ili
45 00
3 00
21 00
15 00
■""12 06
60 00
40 00
21 00
"■"is'oo
""■so'oo
129 45
15 00
■""is'oo
15 00
136 00
22 00
60 00
232 50
51 00
80 00
72 00
48 00
81 00
30 00
""■32"o6
'■■■'8i"o6
48 00
139 00
95 50
32 00
6 00
91 00
75 00
36 00
12 00
109 04
76 00
15 00
-H : :'H :: :rH :::::::::::-.:::::::::: I ::: III 1 ::::: :
Tf^r^N :(N^T(.M : r :M-o« :io««5m« -.M^^^mco .a :ic^iOK,<s,^^^cic^m^K
■ C^ 00 CD CO (M <:i
)i-(:S(NDOC:OTH-rfC^waOU:itClCOO-*
■ ^ if^ iC O CO O O •"
._ , - . _>oo-n<i-i-roio»oo^ii
:r-CMOtDt-COOOCDC^t^=Ol«
:rH^O-:t-CDCDcO^CO(O^CO
.1-H'^CD-^OCOl-^ t-CDtMlO
3 O »0 O 10 IJ
)CO 10 Oi Tt<
OGOOOOiOlOCOTftOOlOiOt^lOlOCDOOOOOCDOlCOlCOOQlClO
C^ -M C^ lO Ol tM -
iS§gg?i?8?
I^ss;
^8^:
ioi^omc^oo3co5<i
^'^Y-Hcooco^o-^t^ooio-^c^CiOor-coooootciccococoic
^ J5 g 00 o o 10 50 p;
'MCCOOOC^^r-C^IOC-l'^OOQO-
I--Tt*t0OC<lC00^"^«Dt^C010C0'
00 to -^ C-. — := I-l (N — ' 1-1 to OO C-1 1
l^i^Sc
;3§s;
) lo ■* «o c-1 T-i 10 « S-.
)OClrHT)<TfrH0510^00>C
I rt :(M CO : .-H
-lOcot^ooasOi-iC^cc-^iCtoir^oDOiOf-nMcc^iotoc^xOiOi-i^'^ii:;
Ph : ?
i '-5.
>
.111
Ul
a 2 S ^ rt-os o fc 2= a a fl^ ^-r; S » S 0.SP7: fc t> ® o § ^ « g 2 S-^^ S
Sfl'2is5§?2
J3 «
2416
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
•piud siganoa ,S3133av 'ON
i :"g1 i2
•joipa 3ni
-pnpui 'sasnadxa WOX
8139 43
28 99
133 10
63 72
427 38
58 70
.55 39
28 05
19 65
175 12
115 85
381 69
207 26
69 98
125 10
128 98
99 57
173 17
106 91
131 02
76 80
107 25
59 22
67 67
1.39 12
159 03
17 69
179 57
•piiaa mox
00 SOI_
00 69
00 8
00 21
00 9
00 f-f-
00 68
02 86
00 n
00 98
02 98
00 81
02 06
00 68
00 8
00 9
00 98
00 o8
00 68
•sasod
-jnj aiq-BiuBqo JsqiO
: iS : j ; : : ig :g i :S : :§ j : :
i is i i i ! ; i"' i» i is : is I i i
iM
: :
•p^aa am aujAina
iiililii
INIHlnii
sN
HI
snBqdJO SupBOnpa
i i i i i i • i i
= I : M i -S i 1 :
• h M M i- M i
I : :
: i :
sailjOTT)^ paMopiAl Jo
jaiiaa JO} piBj ^unoni-v
i : i i i i 1 i i
•mmlllll
: : :
i ! i
II
•sjaqjoja JO
}3il8H Joj piBj ;nnoniv
89 00
■■45"6o"
12 00
36 00
6 00
8 00
""Woo
""so 'Ob
90 50
.18 00
62 00
36 00
14 00
67 50
""sg'oo
44 00
soo
69 00
' "7700
■poAaiiaH -niBj -piM "On
:.::::::::::::::::::::::::::
paAanaa siaqiojg jo -0^
.-H :««ioc-)c^ : :-* -. c^ 10 •» m f ca ^ :m(N-. : :-hio : :
•aSpoT puBJo o; Sana
13 74
2 47
4 40
3 58
12 04
5 90
5 65
2 60
2 42
5 41
12 41
9 04
7 06
7 13
6 61
5 68
5 85
8 47
4 59
6 77
7 56
9 08
4 81
7 36
6 66
5 98
00 r-.
•aSpoi JO sasnadxg
-
8130 43
28 99
56 85
31 72
391 38
52 70
47 39
28 05
19 65
1.52 12
65 85
342 69
116 76
51 98
38 60
92 98
85 57
79 67
106 91
92 02
32 80
101 25
44 22
67 67
131 12
90 03
•aSpoi JO s^diaoaH
8126 15
423 90
145 42
82 50
243 80
171 48
113 20
55 35
107 43
164 81
.539 66
457 00
175 35
189 45
225 28
128 80
140 05
209 86
91 90
135 50
261 45
186 67
96 30
155 07
192 35
142 15
177 80
423 65
•.iSpoT aqi JO saDJnosay
8315 10
485 66
791 33
545 43
2,760 70
840 68
270 60
178 94
701 33
900 46
1,573 81
1,180 80
721 34
805 46
456 65
114 07
726 00
935 53
722 16
295 90
887 68
516 52
385 08
501 37
526 42
275 66
500 00
1,.567 68
•sjaquiajv
Snnnqujnoo jo -Ofj
?;23?sS!?;SSS?§gSSg2?S^S§^:S§i5S5!S8
■spoBio ;sBd
i--t^ x-^ t~ r- . -(»-:= -00 u; -.o « brj «5 «> r- U5 0 c^ «= to T.. U5 05 00 M .0
•sq^Bacr
::;::::: T :'H ::::::: I ::::: :
■snoistndxa
:::::::: i-H :::::::;::.::: :
-■ :
•a-<iKr.iojpaddoja
"::::: :cc-Hco«a>o, : :c.t~ : :,Hcqc.co : .-
Tl.^-
papnadsng
I : \ • I ■ ■. • I
: : : ; 1 : • • : : i'^ : : •
; :
•pa;BjsaiaH
: ; i 1'^ i'^ • •
■ : -^ : ■ ■. ■'^ • l ■ : ■ ■
n :
•pjBQ Xq oMBapqiiAv
• -^ : :"<^''^-^
1 i = : 1'=^ i • : : :" : : :
: :
•pjBO Xq paiiimpv
i I : i'^ 1 : : : = I : : : :
•,7^
•snonoaCaH
: • : 1 i : : : :
•::.:::::::::::
; :
•saoijBiijai
: : : :.-i.-i 1-1 : :
•laqumH
iiiilsssSsiggSiiiSiiisiliiii
1
St. Bernice
Orange
Shipshewana ...
Spades
Stone Ezel
St. Joe
Banquo
Tiosa
Smith's Valley..
Velmn
Moltke
East Chicago
Puritan
Rolling Prairie..
Lucerne
Westport,
Oolitic
Linn Grove
Mt. Zion
Youngstown
Avilla
Wiley
mi
ii
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
2417
I o -H c: : -r .I
gg§??s§§§§§
to -f lO X' o « cc to o «
-H e-i « o to to f-
o o o o o o o
oooo oo o
^ M eo ri< T-i N .-I :c^
i!t lO cr. c-.
emo mo
OM !0 0
io-rt-')<r~co-.occcct~»r-toiooi
^inoOlOtOTPClO
S io K §
<N L-5 :s o
oioomuooooooicicuooc^
cocot^t^wotoiomt— t^r-ccict^
COO«<M-Ht~CO^ttOOI:~lCOTtO
(Nao0wi-^t0"^'-cccco:0'i*c — f— .
(N^— llM00ma0C010T)(<N1000^O
^CD'^-^CMC'lT-t'rl^cOi-ttO.OCDOSI:^
■*e-io-*!oto-i'-.s-*t~tO!N i"^
oa)SSo3SO'3So=S-=
as
10
--Ǥs^s?gs^i?.gs|;s_
: :
■ : : :
: ■:
i
\ ■ '■
^^
-^ i
: ;
: : ■ :
• ; : =
-^ :
: i
" • i
"
= : iZ'
: : (M :rt :
■
• : :""
|||||||S|S3|SS|
5£
-■^
««
ss
S??5^
"^-^oo
— * o o>
tS
^SsS
*;4
S "•^
60 i
£ : : :
■S-d
•2;3
f of Wid. Fam
ating Orphans
ing the Dead,
ble Purposes..
^l>
111
«2|
'O'O'O 2
•S-S'SS
HHs
(Sfifio
!Z5
£S?;
'««-,.«--. .
;3g
0.^=0 "HO
■■3.2J5.S g.ag.^
'3 ^^ S ? 3 P ^ ^
2418
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
OFFICERS
FOR THE TERM COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 1895.
r
Lodges.
1
'A
1
i
Location. [
Noble Grand.
Secretary.
Night of
Meeting.
New Albany
2
3
4
7
8
9
10
11
13
14
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
85
36
38
39
40
41
42
44
45
46
47
49
60
51
52
55
56
57
58
6(
61
62
63
64
66
67
71
New Albany
Madison
Geo. M. Deark
Jas. K. White
V. F. Clark
0. B. Waldo
Leo. F. Leach
W. Caplinger
Chas. Wallace
D. K. Walton
D. B. Norcross
Eugene Toutl
W. C. Nave
J. W. Buck
Monday.
Monday.
JeflfersonviUe
Monday.
Friendship
Morning Star....
Union
Tuesday.
Evansville
Chas. R. Backer ..
Louis Hamman ..
Thursday.
Lawrenceburg
Patriot
New Albany
Madison
Monday.
Wednesday
New Albany....
WaBhington
Chosen Friends.
Fort Wayne
Lafayette
Wayne
John S. Mace
F. P. McKay
Geo. W. Wood....
J. F. Webelhoer.
[. W. Carpenter...
J. A. Hamilton...
Wm. H. Rubush..
Jno. N. Pfeiffer...
Geo. D. Glover....
D. T. Hedge
Joshua Beers
Ora Monger
A. W. Sherwood..
H. Ulrich
Geo. D. Hall
F. M. Jackson
G. E. Dennett
H. F. Churchill...
Thursday.
Fred Harper
Alva Fish
Tuesday.
Monday.
Tuesday.
Friday.
Tuesday.
Fort Wayne
Duncan McLeish
L. H. Briar
Cambridge City...
Indianapolis
Fort Wayne
JohnR. Gray
Geo. P. Anderson
J. N. Kelsey
J F Lewis
Harmony
Wabash
Covington
Friendship
Hoosier
Thursday.
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Covington
J. A. Duncan
G B King
Lafayette..-
CentreviUe
Friday.
Saturday.
Theo. Monger
Geo. H. Reiboldt
T. S. Walker
J. H. Madara
H. H. Penrod
J. G. Fieber
C. W. Hatton
C. W. Ayres
W. H. Robinson..
A. A. Meyer
J. A. Armstrong
G. E. McReyn'lds
W. H. Webster...
Almet Wilson;....
F. 0. Berolh
F. W. Robinson..
A. D. Mohler
W. F. Landes
A. B. Phillips
W. R. Craybill ...
M. A. Baker
A. R. Cook
Saturday.
HeneosisAdei'n
Delphi
Hagerstown
Delphi
Thursday.
Monday.
Wednesday
Brookville
Wednesday
Fayette
Connersville -
Perrysville
Attica
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Wednesday
Attica
M. J. Rupert
C. L. Dreese
C. C. Wyatt
H. Oberreich
Geo. Rumble
W. A Neu
Elkhart County
Franklin
Goshen
Rushville
Thursday.
Wednesday
Laporte
Crawfordsville
Shelbyville
Friday.
Montgomery....
Shelby
Friday.
Monday.
A. C. Nay lor
C. H. Robinson...
Dave Class
Monday.
White Water .
Richmond
Friday.
Lafontaine
Tuesday.
Indianapolis
Greencastle
Wabash
Rochester
P. F. Tall
Wednesday.
Jno. A. Keller
C. E. Lassen
M. C. Chestnut ...
J.W.Andrews
Mason Bruner
Grant White
J. W. Brooks
C. J. Brown
T. H. Heard
G. W. Salts
Tuesday.
St. Anas. M'L...
Wednesday
Wednesday
Mount Vernon
Carlisle
Thursday.
Carlisle
A. M. Morris
W. H. Taber
J. T. Armitage ...
D. J. Davidson ...
P. A. Marquardt
Andrew Lutz
M. A. Barick
H. L. Mullen
W. H. Anderson..
Geo. T. Parker...
Wm. Klingle
J. C. Gordon
Geo. W. Shopbell
Monday.
Terre Haute»...
Terre Haute-
Peru
Friday.
Tippecanoe
Chequeuk
Lafayette
Valparaiso....
Monday.
William sport
Columbus
Monday.
Chas. Curola
S. E. Roof
A. L. Gotwalt
O, W. Nicholdson
B. W. Cummings
Chas. M. Wright.
B. H. Brooks
D. H. Pratt
F. S. Munkelt....
J. M. Wond
Monday.
Fidelity
Pulaski „
New Castle
Elkhart
Friday.
Monday.
Bidgely
Ladoga
Monday.
Wednesday
Protection
Metamora
Saturday.
Princeton
Princeton
Friday.
Wednesday
$^alem
Salem
J. B. Neal
Monday.
P. H. Barnett
W.J.White
Saturday.
*ioward
RockviUe
Robt. Davidson.
Friday.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
OFFICERS— Continued.
2419
Lodges.
1
B
Location.
Noble Grand.
•Secretary.
Night of
Meeting.
Madison
7'2
73
74
75
76
77
78
80
81
82
83
84
87
88
89
90
91
92
94
95
96
97
90
100
101
10-2
103
104
105
107
108
110
HI
112
113
114
115
120
121
122
12a
124
125
126
127
129
130
131
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
142
143
144
14J
i4e
14'
14'
Madison
J fl Shambaek ...
J M Orrell
E R Smock
Tuesday.
Thos B Reed
J A Brown
Wednesday
Muncie
W A Meeker
Jas Rhodarmel...
W C Parsons
W H Franklin.. ..
Geo C Miller
A Johnston
Tuesday.
Liberty Mills
Franklin
G M Rice
Saturday.
B R Kansdell
B F Davis
Monday.
Burlington
Wednesday
C W Ulrich
Magnolia..!
Fairfield
Will N Loper
L J Bodkin
Saturday.
Wednesday
N S Candy
W D Amack
A H McQuiddy...
JCRea
Friday.
New Albany
Geo B Landrum..
Alex Caldwell
Harrison Sanders
Wm Crossley
A T White
Friday.
Saturday.
New Harmony.
New Harmony
Pendleton
Wednesday
Monday.
Frank Thomas...
T P Smith
Dublin
Friday.
H Moodv
Saturday.
Plymouth
G Shearer
Gustav Wolf
J W Jacobs
Thursday
JeffersonvUle
Charlestown
C 0 Davenport ...
W Minor
Tuesday.
Charlestown ....
L Spriestabach...
WS Hood
Friday.
C J Hamilton
John Swisher
H B Cassell
Tuesday.
Mississinnewa .
Fall Creek
Marion
Middletown
J F Carmichael ..
J 0 Lambert
W R Steele
Monday.
Tuesday.
Knightstown...
Knightstown
J H Bundy
G W Rial
Tuesday.
Thursday.
Geo H May
RainsvUle
W R Grames
H Densniore
CTPleak
CFStennle
Saturday.
SDHill
Tuesday.
J L Luchte
Newburg
J C Thomas
J Chappell
J B McKinney
T B Fryar
Monday.
RnsainvillA
Russiaville
Saturday.
Wednesday
W A Tillett
RL Harvey
C F Butz
Frankfort
W H Morris
MM Jackson
B Wagner
Friday.
B P Metcalf
Milton
Milton
EM Morris
Wednesday
Utica
Utica
Jas Deark . .
Geo Beark
Saturday.
Orangeville
JnoFLaswell
Jno N Hatfield ...
W C Harris
J W Meredith
Thos Klinck
A Longfellow
R T Hollowell
Grant Carroll
F N Kellogg
J 0 Parker
A C Reynolds
S D Fox
Saturday.
Bluffton
CarpentersvUle
Chinkaroror
Winchester
Car pen tersville
Williamsburg
Wednesday
Saturday.
Thursday.
SL Drain
C-i
Danville
J H Wilson
Wednesday
Indianapolis
NoblesviUe
Vevay
0 W Vansickle ..
J 0 Clarke
Friday.
Noblesviiie
Wednesday
Wednesday
Jno Kiesel
E G Fancher . ...
N Justis
Moore's Hill....
Moore's Hill
Indianapolis
Paoli
P Loftus
Saturday.
Thursday.
Jacob Hahn
WTKrimbell
EWFinnell
J C Creson
M Ginz
A BHam
Anderson
J L Grouse
EL Danner
Tuesday.
Fairview
S J Myers
H P Goodwin ....
ARottman
FV Martin
W F Hansford
Fred Raider
LCockefair
Wednesday
Greenfield
S B Webb
Friday.
Saturday.
Wm Hansford ...
Jas Carroll
Worthington...
Worthington
Tuesday.
Friday.^
WmRahm, Jr....
JO Steele
Everton „
Rockport
o
J Gillett
WH Brown
Jno W Breeden .
J F Antrim
A J Carnahan ....
T J Cartwright...
W S Lundy
I N Snow
Tuesday.
Eureka
Leavenworth
Rensselaer
N M Barnett
Jno TSayler
J T Richardson...
J W Elliott
Thursday.
Thursday.
Hebron
Boonville
Pennville
Saturday.
Monday.
Will Brighton ....
L E Townsley
W B Lynch
Tuesday.
Sulliyan
Sullivan
Friday.
'Olenn
Darlington
A R Peterson
Thursday.
2420
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
OFFICERS— Continued.
Lodges.
Night of
Meeting.
tjilvers
Camden
Union City
Abington
Morton
Walnut Level...
Fort Harrison...
North Salem
SUr in the West
CoTenant
Grand Prairie...
Clinton
Cecelia
St. Mary's
Winamac
Oxford
Parker
Richland
Delaware ...
Oaceola
Carroll
Pacific
Columbia...
Shawswick
Edwards....
Stewart
Trafalgar
PhcBnix
Rossville
Greensfork...
Shannondale.
Brownsburg..
Selma
Francesville.
Wildey
Terrell
Hiawatha
Purity
Crown Point....
Morgantown
Waldrou
Greenwood...
Herrmann....
Quincy
Ogden
Bourbon
Seymour
Clayton
Tell City
Farmland
Canal
Teutonia
Morgan
Woodward....
Springfield ...
Stewartsville.
Brazil
Waveland
Tipton
Waterloo
Necessity ,
150 Economy
loliCamden
lo2iUnion City
154 Abington
Liberty
E. Germantown.
Terre Haute
North Salem
Lagrange
St. Paul
Brookston
Michigantown. .
Bloomington
Decatur
Winamac
Oxford
Parker
Newtown
Delaware
Thorntown
Delphi
Petersburg
Columbia City....
Bedford
Fortville
Owensville
Angola
Trafalgar
Vevay ,
Rossville„
Greensfork
Shannondale
Brownsburg
Selma
Francesville
Lewisville
Elizabethtown....
Smithland
Mixerville
Crown Point
Morgantown
Waldron ,
Greenwood ,
Richmond
Elwood
Ogden
Bourbon
Seymour
Claytott
TeUCity
Farmland
Canal
Laporte
Mooresville
Richmond
South Whitley
Stewartsville
Brazil
Waveland
Tipton
Waterloo
Alexandria
Chas Hurst :.Ino O Edwards
Heury Richter ..
H R Swisher
EEDye
R M White
Wm Carpenter ..
Wm Sheftuer
S E Thompson ...
Geo Timmis
F W Bailey
J E Roadrick
G HHam
C E Reeves
M L Byers
Peter Haughley ..
B JStemble
EO Smith
Jno H Smith
J W Hamilton ...
RBNoe
Jno Brookbank...
A W selby
W L Vance
C E Nary ...
E West
NRNye ...
J E Waugh
C J Slack ..
W m Brown
Ed Smith...
Geo Lindermaun
Frank Johnson
E E McCrory ...
Jno Kller
Jas Payne
M J Hayes
C Burns
WM Melroy ...
Geo M Fowler ..
TBLee
A R Moser
J W Lautz
Jno R Thomas
Louis Crome ....
O A Armfleld ..
L Melbron
S W Jackson ....
E S Himebaugh
Geo A Harvey ,
Jno Herr, Jr
A. JPursley
M T Butcher ....
EdSalzer
Frank Sheets....
B A Bescher
Geo W Miller...
C Steinbrenuer.
Henry Sueddon
Clark Jarvis
OP Green
DSoule
W H Lipps
Isaac Wolf ,
• •FKarl
J N Swallow ....
Albert Sahm
Calviu Gehr
CMFreelaud....
Granville Davis.
CSStroup
F W Metzler
I J Bordner
GM Lee
J G Scroggin
AK Grubb
O P Stamats
V M Benedict....
Jno M Good
W L Reeves
J F Lamb
C W Johnson
Harry Arnold ....
M J Brady
A D Green ,
J D Vanderburg.
Rob Collins
A. WSprague
HLHutson
G A Gillaspy
A PDufour
S O Weaver
Jno Gilmore
W P Camden
J M Miller
CW Smith
WL Busch
Geo R Boone
RBColvin
J A Cortney
HBess
E Crowell
J V King
Chas Paugh
V D George
Henry Greive
Elias Todd
Wm McKee
H C Duckett
Joe F McClellan..
G W Stone
George Grabhorn
H DGood
J M Brammer
F W Meissner
Elam Harvey
W W Daffer
Jno L Bonebrake
Jos T Welborn ...
G ELuce
Chris Alspaugh ..
Omer Legg
Jno Koons ,...
J F Smith
Tuesday.
Thursday.
Wednesday
Saturday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Friday.
Friday.
Thursday.
Monday.
Saturday.
Thursday,
iday.
irsday.
Monday.
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Friday.
Thursday.
Monday.
Thursday.
Monday.
Thursday..
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Wednesday
Tuesday.
Monday.
Thursday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Friday.
Saturday
Monday.
Saturday. »
Thursday.
Thursday.
Friday.
Saturday.
Wednesday-
Tuesday.
Monday.
Monday.
Wednesday
Saturday.
Wednesday
Wednesday
Wednesday
Monday.
Saturday.
Monday.
Monday.
Monday.
Tuesday.
Thursday.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
OFFICERS— Continued.
2421
Lodges.
1
g
X
223
224
225
227
228
229
231
232
233
231
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
250
251
950
Location.
Noble Grand.
Secretary.
Night of
Meeting.
Crawfordsville..
Border
Crawfordsville
College Corner, 0..
Elmore Hobson ..
Frank Fowler
D L Cameron
ITShockley
Jno Wackmiller..
H B Sallwasser ...
Henry McCarten.
L W Johnson, Jr
Robt Nicholson ..
Chas Groscurth...
GR Cunningham
J D Franklin
C M Cooper
F W Hartson
Lorenzo Burch ...
W M Adams
S D Williams
Geo L Wood
Saml Turner
E E .Tackson
LLamphier
CH Marshall
GeoBargelt
W A King
Monday.
Saturday.
A C Gibson
Karl Bahliuger...
N Weiler
Tuesday.
Wednesday
Concordia
Fort Wayne. .
Michigan City
Fremont
Steuben
Oscar E Miller
PL Holadav
0 W Swearengin
Fred Vogel
Geo C Irwin
N Grefiory .
Tuesday.
Wednesday.
McCarty
Plainfield
Friday.
Humboldt
Greg?
New Albany
Corydon
Wednesday
Friday.
Saturday.
Star
Glendale
Cadiz
Cadiz
G W Thompson.
W A King
LarwiU
LarwiU
Wednesday
Metz
lUiana
State Line
Little York
A J Johnson
D H Thompson...
J HCrim
E V Rice .
Saturday.
York.
Saturday. <•
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Friday.
Mitchell
Mitchell
Young America
Young America...
Jas Demaree
S Miller..
Lowell .. .
Lowell
Laughery
Laughery Val'y
Nathnn Weaver..
W H Vuncanon..
W W Hunt
W H Brown
Saturday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Trenton
Trenton P 0
Campbellsburg
Ashboro. .
Prior Harvey
W P Holaday
Isaac Sharp
Azur
E 0 Pollard
D C Witty
Ashboro
Saturday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Monday.
Tuesday.
Tuesday.
Monday.
Saturday.
LN Chew
S T Dunham
C W Cook
New Haven
253
254
New Haven
GeoGunder
C R Tingle
Richmond
A K Deets
Carthage
Pierceton
Frank Porter
EOGalbreath
JH Hill
257
259
260
262
263
264
265
266
267
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
'>78
W H Kerr
Utllis _
Florence
Wm Thatcher
E W Duff
Edgar Peak
CWMorow
Wm Goodwin
Hartford City....
Argos
Hartford City
Argos
J M Daubenspeck
B EStauffer
C G Nicklas
TF Hodson
W A Gilbert
J K Elder
Saturday.
Friday.
N Manchester..
N.Manchester
Michigan City
Spiceland .
Michigan City..
Spiceland
EMByrkit
Thursday.
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
C B Rifner
W L Jackson
BF Hamlin
Jubilee
Etna Green
PoseyvUle
Milan
Milan
T W Sarkley
LW Wilson
Jno Greriger
W A Curtis
Saturday.
Wednesday
Wednesday
Thursday.
Thursday.
Monday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Thursday.
Saturday.
Friday.
Tuesday.
Wednesday
Tuesday.
Monday.
Wednesday
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Wednesday
Saturday.
Monday.
Caldwell .
Oaktown
J S Shepperd
Aug Happel
Chris Neubauer..
W Asher
Tell
Jefferson ville
Sigel
Martinsville
Martinsville
H H Nutter.
Little River
T H Pickle
G W Stump
0 N Zell
Alto
Alto
Charlottsville
South Bend
Jno Pitzer
Charlottsville ...
Robert Blum ....
AH Thomas
Franz Seopa
N Bolander
C M Miles
H Poehlmann ...
C C Weaver
Edward Ecker ...
J E Bishop
Acton
279
Acton
White River
Edwardsport
Portland
W V Barr
Omega
281
282
283
284
285
28^
289
290
291
W B Magill
W A Mason
Jno D Allegar
Jos Turner
Butler ..
Butler
C M Lewis
Monroeville
Schuyler
Monroeville
Remington
L H Edwards
W H Marquen ...
J M Kennaman..
C H Finch
JnoMartz... ......
Wm Turner
A L Jackson
C A Arnold
H W Schneider...
J H Cord
Mishawaka
Spartansburg
Wheeler
Spartansburg....
Magenta
Fortuna
I S Taylor
H W Abbott
Chas Weshart
J W Newlin
A J Stram
Lawrencebnrg.„..,
Hillsboro
Hillsboro
Fort Branch
Fort Branch
DC Foster
2422
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
OFFICERS— Continued.
Lodges.
1
S
55
Location.
Noble Grand.
Secretary.
Night of
Meeting.
DeWolf
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
300
301
304
305
Wheatland
H Williams
T H Green
Wednesday
Deerfleld
Deerfield
Jno Q Pierce
A Campbell
A B Wall
F Hollingsworth
S P Mast
Lynn
Lynn
Tuesday.
Orleans
Wm Waldup
D W McFarland.
EdMoberly
Thursday.
Monday.
Friday.
I'riday.
Ridgeville ....
Ridgeville. .
A Monical
EllettsTille
Kirklin
CF Kelly
Grandview
Lewis Woolfolk..
A F Kennedy
E A Chenoweth..
0PM Thompson
Geo M Vanhorn..
Jno McAvoy, Jr..
F M Jonhson
E F Good
LFGage
Rockfield
Rockfield
Mount Etna
Mount Etna
W E Gitner . .. .
Saturday
R JC Bird
Fred S Koenig ...
W Pickens
Tuesday.
Wednesday
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Sanders
^0"
Cloverdale
Oakland City ....
Daleville
308
309
310
312
814
816
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
327
328
329
830
331
834
335
336
339
840
341
342
343
344
Oakland City
Daleville
D W Christmas...
J M Fenwick
Thomas Davis ...
WM Ashabroner
W H Crim
Joe C Pyle
S F Huston
JBouth Boston....
South Boston
Walton
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Wednesday
Saturday.
Friday.
Wednesday
Walton
Jas Davis
KendaUville
KendaUville
Eminence ..
CHKimmel
C F Scott
Eminence
W H Wooden
E Shufflebarger ..
A Diller
Waverly
Guttenberg
Connersville
Converse
Fickard's Mills
Andrews
P RusterhoUz ....
CEHiatt
J W SnydRr
Sugar Creek
TPickard
R Wimborough...
E B Graves
Saturday.
Friday.
Tuesday.
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Thursday.
Saturday.
Thursday.
Thursday.
Monday.
Monday.
Friday.
Wednesday
Monday.
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Wednesday
Saturday.
Monday.
Monday.
Thursday.
Friday.
Tuesdav.
Loon Creek
G W Adams.
Hobah
AFMcCrearv
J H C Graham
M L Hoover
J W Kendall
C H Stevens
M Wolf
Gtoldsmith
Goldsmith
J B Devaney
A B Hoover
W H Cummins ...
John P Pool
JD Kidd
CCWestfall
J H Eckles
WheeUng
Wheeling
Mechanicsburg.
Greentown. .. .
Mechanicsburg. ...
Greentown..
North Vernon
Waynetown
Harlan
Waynetown
Prospect
John Harnsell
W C Eminger
Earle
Hobart
John Matthews...
Herman Thiel....
J W Griffith
Phil Linck
Allemania
FBenikampen....
WT Hudson
John Kirsch
Wm Bills
Red Key
Alma
Boonville
McCordsville.
McCordsville ......
F E Tred
Jacob McGinuis..
Loogootee
Warren Lyon
J S Bennett
Henry Hoak
D E Hawkins
EL Ellis
Pittsboro
Pittsboro .
Noah Wright
L Mackey .
Shoals ..
Shoals
RFMain
Yorktown .. ..
Yorktown
M Z Rudy. .
Wm Overmire
Walter Kemper „
LPHutto
Rube Allison
John Cox
Sharpsville
i
352
353
§s
356
857
358
359
360
361
362
368
Sharpsville . ...
Greencastle
T J Ford
L MHanna
Wednesday
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Thursday.
Saturday.
Monday.
Friday .
Saturday.
Saturday.
Friday.
Thursday.
J W Jackson
JP Richards
Shideler
Upland .
Lou Morman
Geo Hitcheock ...
Nixon Henley
I B Goodwin
D W James
Newtonville
Newton ville
Monrovia
Whitestown
Monrovia
C P White
Whitestown
Amant
W M Church
W W Cole
(Joatsville
Coats ville
Levi Harlan
0 D Hollingsw'th
R H Burkhalter ..
TB Coan
GBFriddle
WReed
ER Ellis
Nerie
West Middleton...
Mulberry
E A Strattan
TH Wade
Martz
Clay City
John Neal
Albany
J L Thurston
Markle
Laurel
Calvin Christie...
John W Blunt
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
OFFICERS— Continued.
2423
Lodges.
M
a
1
Location.
i
Noble Grand.
Secretary-.
Night of
Meeting.
Shequoit
385
.367
368
369
370
371
373
IS
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
386
387
390
391
392
393
394
397
399
400
401
403
404
405
406
407
408
410
411
412
413
415
416
417
419
420
421
425
426
428
430
431
432
433
434
435
437
438
43S
44C
W J Conner
A J Correll
Saturday.
Saturday.
Friday.
Wednesday
Thursday.
Saturday.
Clay
And'w Hamilton
Jacob Delawter...
F L Falls
RHilliar
Peter Keegan
O M Colvin
Bunker Hm
Harrell
Bunker HiU
Union
Webster
Maxinkuckee...
Maxinkuckee
New Maysville
Lawrence
John Wiklger
J Modlin
W L Warner
J B Bowen, Jr
W E Hunter, Sr..
Lawrence
G W Johnson
Saturday.
Randolph
Springport
Henry Foreman..
D M Pulver
J A Marshall
BE Miller
Saturday.
J C Murphy
A J Hopkins
FLShafer
Warrick
Selvin
Saturday.
Tuesday.
North Star
Albion
SO Mart
OttoSchulz
Jacob Briles
Geo. Schroeck
\VP Shaw
M Thompson....
H McKeynolds...
Wm Dearmin
CE Jones
Everett Johnson
TS Vawter
J H Goss
Goethe
Terre Haute
New Cumberland
Arthur
Thursday.
N.Cumberland.
Pike
John Frame
Wm H Bottom....
W J Cox
Saturday.
Saturday.
LynnviUe
Saturday.
Wednesday
Monday.
Hazleton
Hazleton
JHTisdal
Pleasant Valley
Rexville
W EFflll
Rexville
Thos N Russell...
PHMetcalf
Geo Facker
S H Brewer
Thursday
Warren
Saturday.
Wednesday
Saturday.
Thursday.
Friday.
A G VanScoyoc.
Otto Fisher
F J Booker
Southport .
Southport
New Ross
W 0 Conner
H M Hauk
T H Rucker
Mexico
Mexico
Grant Beecher
J W Melborn
Chas Jones
0 P Kotterman..
Chas Graves
Joel Telmon
W C Riggs
Carmel
Carmel
Saturday.
Sevastopol
Rising Sun
Lexington
Saturday.
Wednesday
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Wednesday
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Wednesday
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Thursday.
Wednesday
Saturday.
Thursday.
Friday. "
Saturday.
Friday.
Tuesday.
Tuesday.
Saturday.
J PLong
Wm McCutchin ..
J M Bowman
Amos Adkins
Rolla Collins
A Underwood
A Neibarger
Geo M King
L P Hamilton ....
Harvey Riggs
Frank Peterson..
T W Darrah
H 0 Moore
Jno Quinn
T R Randall
MH Scott
Grantsburg
Pleasantville....
Montpelier
Warrington
Blue River.
Hart
Grantsburg
Pleasantville
W R Douthitt
Warrington
A J Gilliland....
W L Pennington
E M Reagan
F A Taber ....
Fredericksburg...
Rees' Mills
Staunton
Rural
Trader's Point ...
Logansport
Eel River
J D Allison
Crothersville
Crothersville
Shelburn
C L Robb
Prairie
CS Lloyd
John W Davis
W W McMahan .
E S Barrett
A. T. Hazelrigg..
A Henderson
JW McKinley..
C F Hoover
Batlervllle
New Corner
Akron
New Corner
Akron
Independence...
Lake City
Annapolis.
Rlgdon P. 0
Warsaw
M N Hunt
A Gemmill
J B Matthews
AH Lee
S F Armington...
Wm Lewis
TM Lehew
Annapolis
Leesburg
Sweetser
F S Byers
Leesburg
W F Armington.
OB Bunnell
SL Black .....
Laban...
New Waverly...
Center
New Waverly
Richland Center..
Walkerton
J F Hogentogler.
Wm Clark
Saturday.
Saturday.
Monday.
Thursday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Saturday
Wednesday
Harrison Walker
W F Young
H M Springer
W C Peed
Walkerton
J R Abner
Windfall
Windfall
WGNuU
StockweU
StockweU
TRohler
Fisher
Fisher's Switch...
BFShafer
WLong
NT Caudle
Star City
F W Robinson ..
B W Reagan
E S Butler
Mauckport
Flat Book
44S
444
44£
Mauckport
W R Mclntire ....
ELesh
Maples
Atlanta
Atlanta
FCollingwood...
MDintz
2424
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
OFFICERS -Continued.
Lodges
MiUtown ...
Bristol
Clear Creek ,
Lessing
Tampico ,
Onward-
Spring Station
loomfi
Bloom field
Michigan ....
Bringhurst....
Fowler
Big Creek
Boswell
Star of Hope
Indianapolis ,
Dupont
Newark
Sandborn
Galena
Homer
Ben Adhem .
Sycamore
Summitville
Vigo
Morse
Milford
Meridian
Midway
Kempton
Aldine ,
Linton„
Shiloh ,
Sharon
Brownstown ...,
Atwood
Cement
Burrows
Parke
Six Mile
Lockport
Hardinsburg...
Evening Star...
Fort Red
Paris
Beech wood
Bee-Hunter
Irvington
Scipio
Point Isabel....
Augusta
Fountain
Bowling Green.
Freedom
Claypool
Bloomingsburg.
Windsor
Tempa
Coal City
Veedersburg....
Monon
Fellowship ,
Milltowu ,
J E Jackson
L J Greenan ....
Jno W Ward ....
(ihristBischoff .
H F Starr
Henry Hass
Bristol...
Cory
Peru
Tampico
Onward .
Chrisney 'J Atwood
Bloomfield
Bellview
Bringhurst
Fowler ,
Marble Corner
Boswell
Brown's Corners.,
Indianapolis
Dupont
Newark
468, Sandborn ,
(Galena ..
Homer....
Lebanon.
473|Giro
175iSummitville.,
Prairie Creek ,
Deer Creek....
Milford
Laconia ,
Indianapolis...
Midway
Kempton
Wolcottville ...
Pimento
Ireland
Colfax
Brownstown..,
Atwood
Prather
Burrows
Marshall
Frank Ramsey.
J R Smith
C WStott
VV R Bolder
Jerry Higbie
Jno Garland...
Henry Hussey.
David Meyers .
Thos Lander ...
L C Pryor
Jno Anderson .
Chas Coffman ..
Ed Plummer ...
Jno Bart
T H Phillips ...
JN Webb
Havden
Riley P. O
Hardinsburg...
Wilkinson
Barnard
Paris Crossing.
Deputy
Switz City
Irvington
Mt. CarmelP. 0..
Point Isabel
New Augusta
Snoddy's Mills
Bowling Green
Freedom
Claypool
Bloomingsburg
Windsor
Folsomville
Brazil
H Mater
WC Yakey
HC Davidson....
W A Bynum
J D Maries
John Pearson
Wm M Smith
M Pontius
Geo WSullens...,
W S Sweeney
EM Dukes
W S Porter
S Parker
Henrv Diebel
R L Miller
Wm Dooley
W E Hillerman..,
GeoTremmer
Geo A Bringle ....
B M Forbes
J L Wright
" B Weeks
N Blocher
Chas Wakefield...
W M Wilson
D C Jenkins
J T Davis"
Peter Power ....
Jno Hermling,
Otto Melton.. .
I L Cousins
T R Jamison ..
F A Myers
TE Dickson...
A A Lamar
Jas Morris
Secretary.
Night of
Meeting.
Veedersburg |0 V Simmerman
Monon IC A McCallister
T L Bvrum
F M Aitken
Chas Wyatt
F Rastaetter ....
Geo F Emma....
Robt Benson ....
Wm Carv
R J Corbley
J W Denny
P H Plank
D J Eastburu....
J H Johnson ....
R Granberg
Francis Reber...
A Dickerson ....
P A Graston ....
W L Livingston
J W East
Jas Miller
J W Arbuckle..
C F Langjahr....
E H Rudy
E W Johnson ...
B C Trueblood .,
J M Groninger ..
E H Groves
O L Huston
E C Thomas
J L Hale
J W Johnson
J D Raber
Thos Hook
E Morgan ,
GC Harbaugh...
Jas Basley
S APyle
J E Brown
W Porter
BB Powell
J W Dundon
D L Sylvester
G W Hoffman....
G W Sowerwine,
N H Bartlett
Geo W Dodd
Wm Gudgel
Chas Wakefield .
T W Wonnell....
L L Biddinger...
P M Brizendine..
L N Neldlinger..
J H Lipton
Otis Drake
Elza Strouse
.A J Scott
M W Hodge
M Davisson ,
J W Roberts
W B Carrigan
Frank Diehl
A Ball
Saturday,
Tuesday.
Tuesday.
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Wednesday.
Friday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Friday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Friday.
Saturday.
Thursday.
Wednesday
Saturday.
Saturday.
Monday.
Thursday.
Tuesday.
Thursday.
Saturday.
Thursday
Saturday.
Wednesday
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Wednesday
Saturday,
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Thursday.
Friday.
Saturday.
Friday.
Thursday.
Thursday.
Saturday,
Friday.
Friday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Thursday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Monday.
Saturday
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Thursday.
Thursday.
Saturday.
Zanesville Nelson Byrd |G W Diffendorfer Wednesday
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
OFFICERS— Continued.
2425
Lodges.
a
Location.
Noble Grand.
Secretary.
Night of
Meeting.
Flora
fiT,
Klora
G W Allen
Joseph Bell
Walter Kensler...
Bicknell
527
628
52!)
6311
631
532
533
534
635
636
537
539
540
641
542
543
544
515
546
547
548
649
550
551
55i
553
554
556
556
557
558
559
561
663
564
365
566
667
568
669
570
571
572
673
574
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
683
584
586
587
588
589
591
592
593
594
Bicknell
W D Lemen
Alex L Marvel ...
0 L Dennis
John Rosbottom
Wm Thomas
J W Cornett
Robert Carter
J E Sellers
Dal ton.
Dalton
W S Farlow
Monday.
New Salisbury ..
Mozart
New Salisbury
Indianapolis
Hellonville
John Dietz
Friday.
Helton ville
R W Hunter
J P Thompson ..
W T Corv
Metosinia
Lafontaine
Saturday.
Oakland .
Thursday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Clifty
J C JolliflF
Elmer Allen
T W Cortingham
W F See
Dearborn .
Wilmington
EVKlinglehofTr
Geo L Woolley...
W F Schultz
Jos Sampsell
M SCoukey
JasGold
Peru
Peru
Jno F Smith
C W Palmer
Frank Whitney.
J A McCord
FCorn
Tuesday.
Allen
Macy
Orland
Saturday-
Saturday
Silver Link
Alfordsville
Piagah
Friday.
Wednesday
JnoCGpddes
CM Graham
F P Leppo
Z T Conway
WEBuckner
W H Coolman
Geo Sharum
Erven Fisher
J G Heischman..
Geo W Burton....
B F Albert
Oweusburg
Owensburg
Friday.
Forest
Laud
Tuesday.
Geo W Mayfleld..
A H Bowen
Broad Ripple
Broad Ripple
Independence
New Marion
Saturday.
W A Rodbertus...
Theo Casner
A L Mart
New Marion
Hackleman
Saturday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Saturday,
Saturday.
Monday.
Jacksouburg
Nebraska
CC CofiFman
Jas Toole .
John H Carr
A S Oriell
Nebraska.
Blue Ridge
Miller
M L Yager
Wm Ensminger .
A Thompson
Geo E Miner
Idaville
Idaville
Palace
Win slow . .
J H McConneii...
J ETrinkle
A C Shumm
Jno Will
Wm F Myers
C F Pickrell
A J Campbell
EP Blanu
Geo L Ireland
CPSauford
W D McCrackeu..
J FClevenger
J H Barr
Tuesday.
Valeene
Valeene
Clarksburg
Clarksburg
Monday.
Wednesday
Algiers
Friday.
Saturday.
Ivy
New Goshen
W CRhyan ...
Anchor
Sugar Branch
Monroe City
Royal Center
Falmouth ,
D N Haydon
EC Vankirk
CE Beckley
J T Jackson
D Martin
WHLyle
T C Bonebrake...
P Gallaher
Thursday.
Myrtle
(JBeauchamp
J A McMlllen
J B Hensley
Falmouth
Saturday.
Glenwood
Saturday.
Saturday.
Friday.
Saturday.
Weduesday
Wednesday
Thursday.
Geo Shegley
B J Miller
Bee
Plainville
Noble
Union Mills
R L Freeman
Geo Weigand
Geo W Yotter
G D Ely
JC Burney
H Maver
Gotthard
Silver Lake
Silver Lake
C L Leonard
John Fodder ....
W^ S Twell
Richland City...
Elizabeth ..
Lake
Thursday.
Monday.
Friday.
Saturday.
Wednesday
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Thursday
Saturday.
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Thursday.
Tuesday.
Elizabeth
C T Black
Eagle
Ed Kelty
J G Barrows
D F Martin
Fulton
Fulton
AH Copner
John R Swain
Alfred Taylor
Dana
J W Redman
L McWilliams
J 0 Higgins
A W Nible
Spurgeon
Spurgeon
Livonia
Livonia... .
H Fulton . .
J W Wolf
Brimfield
Brimfield
CT Hart
J M Lov
Marlon
Patricksburg
Cardonia
A Merrill
A Densmore
Cardonia
Jas Burt ..
Mentor
MB Willis
Scircleville
Scircleville
SCLuttrell
J A Graham
J M Hopkins
Vermillion
Newport
Eli White
2426
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
OFFICERS— Continued.
Lodges.
1
a
Location.
Noble Grand.
Secretary.
Night.
Meeting.
Olive
600
601
fiO''
New Carlisle
C A Parker
G M McCarty
J G Kerlin
Tuesday.
Orion
Wolcott
E A Walker. .
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Green Oak
Green Oak
E Vanduyne
G PC Newman...
FSchulthess
J L Scott
PEShelton
L W Miller
Thursday.
Garrett
Garrett
C S Stewart
Carl Maban
J W Grant
Monday.
fins
Saturday.
Bird's Eye
604
605
606
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
618
619
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
632
633
684
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
66(1
661
663
664
66f
Bird's Eye
E M Critchfield...
John Ice
A C Bergholtz
M E Newby
Saturday.
Saturday.
Wednesday
Michigan City
Fred Richter
L E Vance
Wednesday
James Todd
E E Duffy
J A Billup
Saturday.
Friday.
Friday.
N Madison
N Madison
R H Patton
Springtown
Colfax
Marengo
A J Scott
William Carle
WS Hanger
H J Short
Carl C Cross
L T Quigley
J A Stark
Knightsville
Wednesday
Mount Ayr
Samuel Warner...
R H Woodrow
J E Griffith
Tuesday.
Oriole
C Littlejohn
Wm H Cook
A H Barber
FJMcKasson
D C Forbes
Tuesday.
Leiter's Ford ...
Leitfr'sFord
South Milford
Gentryville
S Newcomer
Saturdav.
Gentryville
Farmersburg ...
J J Roberts
Friday.
Farmersburg
Bennington
Albert Dial
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Levi Lewis
W A Tucker
Theo Hubbard....
William Cox
Jesse Pence
J WGamfill
J M Yontsler
Geo W Richason
C J Lundin
0 Copeland
G W Pilkington.
L L Mason
J W Poston
L Quackenbush..
E D Covalt
Newberry
Swayzee
Medarysville
Valley
Newberry
Thursday.
Tuesday.
Friday.
Medarysville
Wm H Tilton
Jas M Tyner
F A Wilkinson...
J J Majors
Cass PC
Saturday.
New Amsterdam..
Anoka
Saturday.
Wednesday
Anoka
N B Richason
J M Chidester
S Lindley
Fridav.
Tangier
Van Buren
Saturday.
Saturday.
Van Buren..
G W Camblin
F F Gregg
Fridav.
Dubois
Chandler
Huntingburg
Chandler
RobtBoling'
PhilSteinmutz...
W W Beasley
J N Corner
Fred Brown
B F Musgrave
TG Morgan
A C Cosand
RMBell
Charles Gift
F M Martin
C A Cress
Friday.
Saturdav.
Salem Center....
Lincolnville... .
Salem Center
Lincolnville
Geo Ousterhout...
Charles Batty
Phil Berg
Saturday.
Saturday.
Georgetown
Bright Light...
Carlos City
Tuesday.
Coal Bluff
HP Davis
G W Mills
Friday.
Saturday.
Hugh McBroom..
H Buckhart
S E Kemp
Sam McBroom ...
Chas McKinley...
F F Hostetter....
D W Ax
Silver Valley...
Dale
New Providence ..
Dale
Thursday.
Saturday.
R E Lumerman ..
Chas Kepler
C C Osburn
Tuesday.
Friday.
Hamilton
Hamilton'.
T W Thomas
HA Dean
G W Lockhard...
0 Hodson
Newton Stewart
Newton Stewart.
Deedsville
Mooreland
Thursday.
Deedsville
C Wildmau
N D Jester
Saturday.
Tuesday.
Jos Wolfrom
0 G Ziegner
Edward Fisher...
C E Doty
J W Loughlin...
Jas Cassiday
J I Elder
N D Powers
L F Brooks
L S Barnard
W L Sherrock...
Jno S Hilliard...
C L Faucett
J K Smith
Harper
St. Louis Crossing
Milroy
Saturdav.
Milroy
Saturday.
Brightwood
New Point
Wednesday
New Point
Wednesday
West Baden
West Baden
Saturday.
W. Indianapolis...
Battle Ground....
Thursday.
Saturday.
Saturday.
Battle Ground
J B Swisher
P Fansler..).
Rich Connor
ThosjFoxworthy.
B F Smith
M K Thompson..
Wm Matthews...
Geo Heldt
Elberfeld
Elberfeld
Cedar
Coal City
M WBenham....
W P Miller
Tuesday.
Amboy
Wednesday
Landess
Landess
W D Boiler
Wm Lee
Wednesday
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
OFFICERS— Continued.
2427
Lodges.
g
'4,
LocatiOTi.
Noble Grand.
Secretary.
Night of
Meeting.
St. Bernice
Orange
666
667
668
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
68fi
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
'£
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
70fi
St. Bernice
Young's Creek ...
Shipshewana
Spades
Geo McCown
W T Winetur
J CDoble
J P Hartsook
Chas De Tarr
Chas Habbert....
Jno Munger
M Myers
F A Jenkins
Frank Emeston..
Wm Reynolds....
F W Colbert
Jones Kemp
Louis Roth
Friday.
Saturday.
Shipshewana...
Ripley
Stone Ezel
Thursday.
Nashville
Sam Kelly
Tuesday.
St Joe
St Joe
W N Lyon
Tuesday.
Saturday.
Wednesday
J S Charles
Tiosa
Tiosa . . .'.
I N Good
Smith's Valley
Velpen
Smith's Valley ...
Velpen
G M Harden
G W Cockriel
DD Deworack....
S T Johnson
0 P Turpin
J V Hickman
Jno Backus
C Talkington
Wm A Spicer
Wm Wechter
N E Rogers
OP Smith
Jno W Potter
Chas Francis
A M Burns . .
Saturday.
Saturday.
Moltke
Friday.
Tuesday.
Friday.
East Chicago...
Puritan
East Chicago
Haughville
Rolling Prairie...
Lucerne
C M McClelland.
Edgar Pratt
C B Carlton
Jas Swain
Rolling Prairie
Lucerne
Wednesday
Saturday.
Westport
Oolitic
Westport . . .
Thursday-
Stinesville
W E Emery
D Baumgartner...
J 0 Houser . ..
Linn Grove
Linn Grove
Wednesday
Mt ZioQ
Mt Zion
Friday.
Tuesday.
Tuesdav.
Youngstown ...
Avilla
Youngstown
Avilla
MT Andrick
F HHersh
Wiley
GeoKeister
TDHockensmith
E W Phelp
West Point
Bippus
Wednesday
Wheatfield
Wheatfield
F W Fisher
EH Miller
WE Tweedy
J W Morrison
J L Vanfossen ..
James Jerret
F Philpott
Tuesday.
Friday.
Mapleton
Mapleton
LBallen
A B Stephenson.
Elam Beard
G Q Shortridge...
G W Lawrence...
F AShoaf
Sheridan
Sheridan
Wednesday
Saturday. "
Hudson
Hudson
Carhon
Carbon
Thursdav.
North Judson..
Yeddo
North Judson
Yeddo
Whiting
Wednesday
Tuesdav.
Fraternity
Alton
I C Brett
T J Griffith
Friday."
J T Boyd
Rosedale . .
Rosedale
J Boatman
Geo A Hunter ...
Jas Burroughs ...
T A Vaughn ....
E N Wicht
T W Johnson
W H Graves
O P Barrett .f ...
W H Morris
C W Kellv
GeoEDeuehie ...
Wm Klusmeier...
Henry Rule
C H Masten
A CCrim
Saturday.
Tuscarora
Centre Point ...
Amo .
Montgomery
Centre Point
Amo
Wednesday
Thursday.
Thursday.
Sellersburg
Saratoga..
Sellersburg
Saratoga
DeGonia Springs
Eden
W A Wilmore ....
J T Partridge ....
J E Jarrett
Harry Hitchcock
RCShoflfner
G H Grieger
Saturday.
Hancock
Friday.
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
Terre Haute
Hanna
Hanna
Jas Wells
Otter Creek
Burnett
Liberty
Frankton
TCMcMuUen ....
CR Wright
H H Heist
J W Mott
Frankton
W E Grose
Thos Shepherd...
T L Hoover
Martinsburg ...
Twelve Mile....
Martinsburg
Twelve Mile
Marvsville
T M Barr
Marysville
Ilion
J C Hardy
ilion
2428
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
OFFICERS OF REBEKAH LODGES.
FOR THE TERM COMMENCING JANUARY 1, 1895.
Lodges.
Secretary.
Ruth
Ruth
Naomi
Olive Branch
Social
JefFersonville
Olive Branch
Naomi
Martha Washington
Colfax
Charity
Charity
Charity
Colfax
Unitv
Fidelity
Sarah
Hermania
Salome
Eden
Eden
Harmonia
Colfax
Pleasant
Miriam
Cicero
Schuyler
Concordia
Selma
Naomi
Lima
Three Link
Leah
Nightingale
Charity
Friendship
Naomi
Liberty
Evergreen
Siloam
Sarah
Matilda
May Flower
Ruth
Charity
Naomi
Esther
Miriam
Prospect
Philo
Salome
Abiah
Eureka
Adina
Fortville
Argos
Paradise
Noah's Dove
Olive
Naomi
North Star
Flo. Nightingale
New Albany
Lebanon
Muncie
Spartensburg ,
Knightstown
JefFersonville
Indianapolis
Union City
} Crawfordsville . ..
Jonesboro
New Haven
Dunkirk
New Castle
Abington
Butler
Mishawaka
Brownsburg
Richmond
Warsaw
Camden
Richmond
Indianapolis ,
Evansville
Angola
Andrews
Cicero
South Bend
Fort Wayne
Selma
Pierceton
Waverly
Larwell...
Rockfield
Bourbon
Waldron
Ladoga
Dublin^
Liberty
Rochester
Waveland
Evansville
Danville
Brazil
Aurora
Valparaiso
Elkhart
Dillsborough
Alto
Harlan
Greensburg
Mitchell
Frankfort
Washington
Delphi
Fortville
Argos
Blufifton
Converse
Decatur
Bedford
Albion
Newburgh
Rosa Lee Mitchell..
Elsie Potts
Mary Youngman...
Lulu Morgan
Mary St Clair
Sallie Maxwell
Bessie Skinner
Vic Buckingham ...
Mrs G W Brown
Ida O Van Metre....
Nettie Davis
Frances Matthew...
Mrs M E Wisehart..
Jane Roby
OUie Brunstriter ...
Cora Meise
Estella M Crouch .,
Eliza Kuhlmann...
Ollie Roberts
Myrtle Payton
Hattie Spekenhier..
Ernestine Krieger.
Mary E Silver
Jennie Parsell
Viola Small
Hattie Dick
Kate Krauser
Sophie Schuly
Sadie Hufford
Mabel Machett
Luetta Shuffleb'ger
Sarah A Essig
Lulu Mellinger
Jennie Ritehey
Lucretia Paugh
Alice Smythe
Lizzie Hammond-
Rose Far r
Ella LRoss
Nancy C Bridges ...
Louisa Rischraaun
Lou Tomlinton
Orpha James
Blanch Shutts'
Cordelia Cornell
Clara Hooper
Ida Smith
Mary F Petzer
Jane Ritchie
Sallie McKee
Sarah C White
Ada Petty
Libbie Bogner
Nellie Madara
Ella Arnett
Augusta Chapman
Emma Mason
Anna Tuey
Chas Suttles
Kittle Day
Christie ASchaff...
Kate Schuitz
Emma Clark.
Nora Trumel.
Jennie Winser.
John Hough.
Jessie Cole.
Lydice Graff.
Belle Sellers.
Mary A Smuck.
Mrs. Benj. Oliver.
Elijah Custer.
Lillie A. Miller.
Sarah Miranda.
Eva Gough.
Anna Brown.
Jennie Lewis.
Chas Finch.
Nora Hopkins.
Chas G Marshall.
Virginia Rigdon.
Maggie Wolf.
Ora Strattan.
Barbara Zubel.
Helen Kuehn.
Agues Johnston.
Orville D Adams.
Sue Slack.
Anna Treyermuth.
Mary Krapft.
Emma Fertick.
Anna B Beed.
Clara Prescott.
Florence Essig.
Pearl Plinck.
Edith Keller.
Chas Paugh.
Bettie Smythe.
Maggie Binkley.
Bessie Driggs.
Adele Ross.
Sarah E Mcintosh.
Anna Lotzevich.
Alice Otis.
Frances E. Brown.
Spica McKain.
Martha Kellogg.
Mary Carl in.
Anna Smith.
Laura Kemp.
Jenny Keener.
Ida Ridout.
Emma Sutherland.
Mary Landis.
Dora Biddinger.
Lucy Moretman.
Robt Collins.
J D Townsend.
Elizabeth C Bender
Ina Keegler.
Nellie M Blackb'n.
Cordia Duggy.
Eva Eagles.
Carrie Locke.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2429
OFFICERS OF REBEKAH LODGES— Continued.
Secretary.
Mount Olive
Esther
Star
Winchester
Ruth
Bee Hive
Prairie City
Harmony
Moriah
Deborah
Americas.
Ruth
Hope
Naomi
Fidelity
Mary
Sophronia ,
Purity
Social
Rushville
Gaston
Kewanna
Leah
Falls City
Victoria
Philanthropic...
Eden
Victoria
Martha
Martha
Bernice
Lina
Chrystal Fount .
Elizabeth
Naomi
Hope
Salem
Ruth
Summit
Vermillion
Silver Star
Omega
LaGrange
Frienpship
Hope
Covenant
Eudora
Evening Star....
Prairie Creek....
Alpha
Faith
Lake
Mystic Jewel
Esther
Lucretia
Friendship
Mizpah
Lilly
Mutual Love
Eureka
Fidelity
Magnum
Morning Star....
Eastern Star
North Vernon ,
North Manchester
Peru
Winchester
Moore's Hill
Greencastle
Terre Haute
Goodland
Kokomo
Fort Wayne
Parker
Markle
Greenfield ,
Plainfleld
Holton
Staunton
Winamac
Logansport
Moutpplier
Rushville
New Corner
Kewanna
Mexico
Pendleton
Hagerstown
Hazleton
Thorn town
Delphi
Corv
Bunker Hill
Sweetser
State Line
Oakland City
Elizabethtown ,
Chrisney ,
Atwood
Francesville
Carlisle
Fowler
Clinton
Westville
Oxford
Lagrange
Brookville
Lawrenceburg
St. Paul
Monticello
Petersburg
Prairie Creek
Mulberry
Columbus
Lake P. O
Macy
Paris Crossing
Rising Sun
Elizabeth
Monon
Scottsburg
Clay City
Rising Sun
Indianapolis
Etna Green
Bellview ,
Dalton
Ida Perkins
Laura Naftger
Alice Hay
Margaret Ginger....
Oara Bigney
Alice Kerr
Anna Tomlinson...
Lulu Butler
Lily O Hull
Sue Zimmer
Mollie Davis
Martha Stockman ..
Mollie Winslow
Rebecca Palmer
Clara CMcFatridge
EvaBrandrifiF
Lillie Magee
Maud Wise
Lillie Bawlings
Allie Aldridge
Mattie Nelson
Ora Patty
Mollie Personett....
Hattie G Taylor
Dora Martin
A C Sisson
Adda Masters
Ida Brookbank
Melissa James
Elizabeth Lestore...
Frances M Bragg ...
Emma Madara
Lillie M Colven
Bell Meyers
Sallie Murray
Minnie Creighton.
W.D. Bush
Carrie Aken
Orna White
Laura Weatherwax
Emma Link
Dora Warnai
Susie Hinckley
AnnaDennet.".
Carrie B Schneider
Minnie Lee
Jennie Reprogle....
Etta Farmer
Emma Beard
Jennie Attic
Ida Barrick
Jennie Cruse
Angle Belt
Ola Rowland
Louisa Bloss
Laura Hildebrand
CoraMcBee
Liz7.ie Thompson..
Ruth Miller
Laura Bennett
Maud Wonnell
Rhoda Elder
Mollie Cope
Myrtle Farlow
Carrie Schwake.
Hattie Mills.
Delora Trippe.
Mollie Reinheimer
Ida Schabel.
David E Badger.
Julia B Yeley.
Eva Weidenbaker.
Ida Sipe.
Jennie Windsor.
Lou Clevenger.
W Reed.
Sarah A Areley.
Daisy Fogolman.
L Moon.
Minnie Anderson.
Ida Kroft.
Grace Toby.
Grace Brunman.
Daisy Brown.
Jas W Hannan.
Florence Yarbro.
Sadie Junkin.
Laura Brown.
Mollie Walker.
W L Sission.
Mary Mayer.
Alice Clark.
Nevada Wyatt.
Robt C Foor.
Leatha Blackman.
Stella Woods.
Ella Colven.
Anna Trent.
S N Shrode.
David S Welch.
Mrs Bucht'nhirc'er
Julia A Cowle.
Emma B Alkire.
Lillie Birt.
Libbie Dodd.
Eliza C Moore.
Cassia Macha.
Martha Butler.
Louisa Koehler.
Nora Metzler.
Eva Short.
Anna Shandy.
Rachel Gobin.
Maud Ohl.
Lida Beaty.
Ellis Wilson.
Rosa E Tracy.
Elijah T Dixon.
Lydia Linscott.
Bettie Rush.
Flora McBee.
Ida Ridlen.
Belle Molten.
Fannie M. Larend.
Evangeline Bartley
James Watson.
John W Denny.
Linley Dennis.
2430
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
OFFICERS OF REBEKAH LODGES— Continued.
Ix)dges
Eel River Valley..
Mt. Lebanon
Mystic Tie
BluflFCity
Charity
Colfax „
Ridgely
Marion
Esther
Ruth
Rula
Sullivan
Elwood
Crescent
Diana
Atlanta
Kenner
Charity
Warren
Alexandria
Zeurah
Hope
Eden
Sarai
Vistula
Evening Star
DeGonia Springs..
Esta
Fountain City
Ridge ville
Frances
Margaret
Forest
White Rose
Deerfield
Triumph
Star City :.
Peru
Magnolia
Emerald
Grace
Faith ,
Sarah
Maze
Florence
Ruth
Tipton
Wabash
Fairmount
Acme ,
Alpha
Trenton
Dale
LaGro
Violet
Charity
Columbia
Hamilton
Ida
Blonda
Odon
Edwards
Shining Light
Evelyn
South Whitley
Greencastle
Prather
Rockport
Middletown
Harmony
Roanoke
Marion
Owensville
Florence
Riley
Sullivan
Elwood
Auburn
Evansville
Atlanta
Garrett
Huntington
Warren
Alexandria
Farmland
Newport
Windfall
Morocco
Orland
Ft. Branch
DeGonia Springs...
Colfax
Flora
Ridgeville
Hymera
Eminence
Forest
Dugger
Deerfield
Lafayette
LaFayette
Peru
Cardonia'
Connersville
Metamora
Waterloo
CoalBluflf
Sharpsville
Canal
Spurgeon
Tipton
Wabash
Fairmount
Chandler
Portland
Trenton
Dale
La Gro
Linton
Loogootee
Tell City
Hamilton
Greensfork
Charlotts ville
Odon
Terre Haute
Rockville
Centreville
Secretary.
Electa Foster
Kate Hartgrove
Carrie Gibson
Mrs W F Simpers...
Emma Lambert
Jennie Hamilton-
Florence Delany ...
Laura Ragan
Hester Lockhart
Zerelda Thatcher .,
Lizzie Stratton
Emma Rummel
Nettie Holler
Jennie Larue
Mary Kriug
Delia Manuel
Cassie Cruley
Florence Goss
Nancy Arnett
India'Clayton
Louise Dillon
RoxieBoldon
Maria A Hope
Lena Fain
Sadie Lowe
Annie Jones
Mrs Lou Rich
Jemima McC'rmick
Lizzie Yegner
Mrs L Stutsman
Laura M Mamnan .
Luella Fancher
Katura Fabieno ...
Flo Brown
Alice Beers
Jennie Nelson
Huttie Welch
Rebekah Dowling..
Susie Rieman
Kate Senour
Mary Morell
Mary Camps
Rebekah Arbuckle
Letitia Heiner
Polly J. Lorton ....
Lida McBridge
Onia Grover
Ida Brandenburg.
Eugene P Shelton.
Stella Gibson.
Etta Sargent.
Mattie Young.
Lizzie Rammage.
John Moore.
Maud Middleton.
Lute Matthews.
John A Keith.
Edna Sheets.
MoUie Willis.
Metta Pierson.
Belle Richards.
Estell Whitt'nbuck
N H Roads.
Nora Cobler.
Lena Zeller.
Rosa E Tracy.
Kate Gillett.
Lillie Clavton.
ISue Whetsel.
Clara Summers.
BF Roadruck.
Sue B Alcott.
Nellie Grave.
Jennie Wilkenson.
Rose Cumberworth
Lizzie Stechle.
Delia Allen.
Miss L Badera.
Chas F Scott.
Mary Peters.
John E- Moore.
Ella Conklin.
Nellie Howell.
Daisy Miller.
N E Underwood.
George H. Dodge.
Ella Tucker.
J C Gordon.
Cora Barholorum.
Samuel Camps.
Victora Mills.
Mary E Nunn.
Jennie Davis.
Anna Thomas.
Mary Mitten.
Clara Myers ISadie L Briles,
Maud Lawrence
Samantha Roll
Cora L Coffin
Anna Wallace
Millie Adams
Susie Morgan
Maiia Brown
Frances Boger
Mary McCool
Lenora Clawson ....
Florence Addison..
Cinthia Leach
ME Henderson ....
Maud Davidson ....
Effie Smith
Mary Lawrence.
Mrs Ray Stewart.
Bettie L Johnson.
Sallie Singleton.
Adda Todd.
Lilly Mott.
Hannah A Major.
Mary Kuentsler.
Grace McHenry.
S Elizabeth Brown.
Hattie G Oldham.
Eva Seeply.
Sarah Kirkham.
Clara Goatley.
Mable Leesou.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2431
OFFICERS OF REBEKAH LODGES— Continued.
Lodges.
Queen Esther ..
Lafontaine
Myrtle
Silvia
Knightsville
Ohio
White Lilac
Selvin
Ida
Beulah
Carlos City
Olive
Angerona
Industry
Beatrice"
Ruth
Tilla
Stella
Friendship
Rensellaer
Hazel
Brown's Corners,
Winona
Mary
Sarah Ellen
Royal Center
Banner
Losantville
McQuiddy
Goshen
Rachel
Magnetic
Mary Hilton ...
Lydia
Ivy
Neola
Gosport
Honey Creek ....
White Plain
Madison
Tippecanoe
Rachel
North Star
Star
Mary
Naomi
Gas Center
Dove
Brookston
Kendallville....,
Wolcottville
Purity
Ivy
Bethel
Remington
Rolling Prairie.
Grace
Kempton
Lawrence
Beatrice
Rachel
Merom
Mary
Edinburg
Century
Fort Wayne
Lafontaine
Mt. Jackson
Geneva
Knightsville ..,
Cannelton
Osgood
Selvin „
Austin
North Madison
Carlos City
Otterbein
Huntingburg..
Muncie
340 1 Helton ville ....
311 Columbia City.
Upland
Centre ,
Monroe City ....
Rensellaer
Cambridge City
3 18 Brown's Corners..
Michigan City
Daleville..
Shelburn
Royal Center
Coatesville ...
Losantville ...
Shelbyville ...
Goshen
Russiaville ...
Orleans
Union Mills
Winslow
Richmond....
Brightwood ..
Gosport
Amboy
Lyonton
Battle Ground...
Onward
Monterey
Falmouth
Boswell
Gentry ville
Summitville. ...
Freedom
Brookston
Kendallville
Wolcotville
North Salem ....
Anderson
Laud ,
Remington
Rolling Prairie..
Patriot
Kempton
Plainville
Kokomo
Somerset
Medarysville....
Knox
Edinburg
Hartford ('ity ....
Secretary.
Mamie Lingmaster
Anna Thompson..,
Ida Farley
Laura Weeks ,
Emma Clements ..,
Belle Sutton
Stella Glasgow
Mattie Taylor
Martha Carr
Lizzie Chapman ..,
Lora Shepherd
Libbie Ambler
Klva Barnes ,
Sadie Twibell
Mrs D P Gregory .
Mollie Waidlich ...
Dora McDonough..
Mary Bruen .:
Mary Sampson
Rebecca Porter
Fannie Cornell ...
Adclia Chesterman
Stella Byrkit
Mamie Forrest ...
Eifle Anderson...
Sadie NeflF.
Deanne Masters .
Lydia Wine
Dotia Huestes
Olie James
Clara F Rutclifif .
Hattie Talbott ...
Belle Terrv
EffaBethell
Kate Norris
Lucy A Mulholand
Alice Dagley
Anna Whitt
Hanna Scott
H H Murray
Lizzie E Foster
Lottie Benson
Margaret Wright..
Minnie Garden
Mrs M E Martin ...
Ella Williams
Sarah J Clark
Jennie Mcintosh ..
Harriet Chilton . .
Ella Berkalter
Minnie Wildman ..
Nettie Chick
Kate Wagoner
Dinah Bennett
EllaStoutt
GeniaO. Walt
Maria Dibble
Lulu Booker
Esie Burks."
Millie Devels
Maggie Harris
Alice P Williams...
Bertha Beeman... .
Bettie McGoughey.
Lulu Wilier
innie Bittner.
Ida Morris.
Cora Nickerson.
Minnie Luedaker.
Robt Salmond.
Maggie Chilton.
Lotta McCalister.
N E Tilman.
I W Blunt.
Cordia Patton.
Lottie Miller.
Sallie Chenoweth.
Mrs E Worsham.
Diantha Nihart.
Fannie Ross.
Fannie Green.
Jas W Lyon.
Mattie Hercules.
Catharine Berry.
Laurie T Shields.
Mary J Hinshaw.
Mrs D Reber.
Florence Nordyce.
S A Cornelius. '
Sue Moore.
Lou Terrel.
Mollie E Gamboldt
P L Holaday.
Lulu Amman.
Myrti Barbar.
Addie Cline.
Bessie Conder.
Allie Teeple.
Jas Anderson.
Sue M Thomas.
Laura Clampit.
Lottie Criss.
J C Whitt.
Ella McGrew.
Jennie Custer.
Lizzie Steen.
Eliza Kalb.
G W Clemens.
Jos Jackson.
Edith Lawson.
Kate Kellams.
Kate Webb.
Lizzie Pryor.
Ora Geiger.
Eva Ruthven.
Alice Sherman.
Nora Trotter.
Greta Hileman.
Thos. E. Hall.
Ida Allison.
Mary Bartmess.
Lou Bodkiu.
May Lyons.
Lida Trotter.
Hattie Evans.
Mrs Ross Weesner.
Ophelia Jones.
Emma C Kratli.
Bertha Cupp.
Lizzie Gable
2432 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
OFFICERS OF REBEKAH LODGES— Continued.
Lodges.
Nolile (rrand.
Secretary.
Progress
Ella
New Carlisle ...
Columbia
Harmony
Lucille
Naomi
Esther
Grace
Miriam
Rose
Social
Wheatfleld
Dorcas
Marietta
Lizzie
Anna
Love's Labor .
South Milford.
Hudson
Honor
Charity
Sarah
Mt Olive
Rose of Sharon
Parthenia
Hammond
Columbian ....
Liberty
Oakland
Hebron
Martha
Mary
Hannah Ruth....
Omega...
Celestial
Lucy
Venus
Union
Vevay
Sylvia
Independence....
Western Star ....
Schuyler
Olive
Mary
Silver Star
Margaret
Evergreen
Golden Star
Sunbeam
Bernice
Margaret
Salem Centre ....
Esther
Pride of Wabash..
Bertha
Pocahontas
Esther ,
May
Alpha
Social
Evening Star
395 Haughville Jessie Harmon
39(j Levvisville Ella Boone
398 New Carlisle Ollie Denney
399 Monroeville Carrie Strass
400 Swayzee Mary E Firemood.
401 Blouutsvillc Addie Routh
402 Anoka Adna Dykeman ...
404 Youngstown Sarah .Johnson
406 Greentown Florence Poole
407' East Chicago Mary Jefferson
408 LaPorte E E. Bennethew ...
409 Loughrey Susan Weaver
410 Wheatfieldt Eliza Fisher
411 Newark Cynthia Hoke
412 Redkey Maggie D Sage
413 Ellettsville Mary E Chamber...
414 Burrows Annie B Wassen...,
415 Ambia Mary Kister
41G South Milford Felica Reed
417 Hudson Mary Frederick ....
418 West Indianapolis Amand M Earle ....
419 North Judson Esther Hecox ,
420 Deedsville EllaFites
421 Mt Etna Dess Calvert
422 Carmel Ida Beeson
423 New Ross Lizzie Powell
424 Hammond..., Mary Rinebach
42.5 St Bernice Alda McCown
426 Clifty India Barnes
427 Oaklandon' Clar^ Pickle
428 Akron Sarah Strong. ".
429 E. Germantown ... Alma Hes?
430 Blue Ridge Ellen Whisman ....
431 Rosedaie Maggie Conley
432 Farmersburg Fannie Taylor
433 Albany Annie Barger
435 Manchester Sarah I.Turner
437 Franklin Lizzie Solenburg....
438 Laurel Mary Hendricks ...
439 West Middleton ... Lou Somerville
440 Vevay Lou M Kiesel
441 Mapleton Lida Hubbard
442 Independence Rilla Stacker
443 Mooreland Almeda Main
44(5 Avilla LuellaFinley
447 North Cumberland Alice Wharton
448 St. Louis Crossing.. Kate Linke
449 Carbon Mary Sheldon
4.30 Pittsboro Effie M Mills
451 Shipshewana Effie Halbert
452 Whiting Jennie Knapp
4.53 Carthage Eunice Publow
4.54 Monrovia Viola Hornaday....
455 Dunreith Minnie J Custer
45G Salem Centre Ella Dale
457 Clayton Lucy M Harvey
4.58 Vincennes R A Greenhord ... .
459 Lewis Eizzie Peters
460 Milfori Hattie Davidson....
461 Edwardsport Carrie F. Reeve
462 Grajieville Candice Pugh
463 Owensburg Aliee Brandon
464 Yorktown 'Emma E Overman.
465 Walkerton 'M R Burger
Mollie Connor.
Hattie Johnston.
Hattie Vincent.
Edna Miller.
E D Covalt.
Zella Y'ockey.
Lottie Persinger.
Linnie Davis.
Ida Hamer.
Ida Williams.
Sarah Keeler.
Inez G Miller.
Carrie Johnson.
Nannie Casner.
Cora E Sage
Cora Allen.
Nanie Snyder.
Frank Rictenour.
Althea Rowland.
Mary Strawser.
Aurora Elder.
Rosa Garing.
Mrs S E Deeds.
Laura Giltner.
Cora Haines.
Minnie Bronagh.
Tillie Kolb.
Maud Ayers.
Alice Allen.
Alice Pickle.
Rosa Sibert.
Nettie Gipe.
Esta Yager.
Laura Montgomery-
Ida Wood.
Augusta Oliver.
Jennie Piatt.
Alice Par.sons.
Emma H Pike.
Lizzie McCool.
Lulu Boyd.
Dora Barker.
Alice Y^ount.
T E Moore.
Maud Hooper.
Emma Dunn.
Annie Rogers.
Edna Dorries.
Nora E Hubble.
Orpha Junod.
Florence HelmaQ
Laurice Henley.
Geo Long.
Fanny Haye-s.
Cynth A merman
M McCormick.
Nettie Berry.
R N Woodrow.
Bettie Servoss.
Lillie Reeve.
Nolia Poeue.
Emma Fields.
Maud Warfel.
Lulu Nichols
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2433
OFFICERS OF REBEKAH LODGES— Continued.
Lodges.
Location.
Noble Grand.
Secretary.
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
Metz
Addie Sewell
Lucy Hauna-
Lillian Derbyshire
Vif>tf>rin
Cowan
David M Hays
Saratoga
Homer..."
Newtown
Alice Stewart
Delia Hinkle
Ida Plummer
Laura Harris
Nora Reeves.
Vienna Grams
Jennie Arnold
J W Jacobs
Liberty
Stockwell
Bird's-Eye
Michigantown
Denver
Arlington
Lawrence
Reese's Mills
Bessie Osborne.
Martha
H H Bonner
Raohel Kelley
Emma Tharp
Grace Van Why.
Charity
Ella Bell
Arlington
Belle McDaniel
Anna Records
Ina Umberline
Hattie Rupert
Lizzie Osboru
Bessie Rucker.
Welcome
Emily W Thomas.
Eva B Miller.
Oak Leaf
Attica
Lou Poole.
Economy
Jennie Lonsberry.
Eden
Eden
Effie Alford
Irvin Barnard.
Leesburg
Fatricksburg
Dora Hall
May Diehl.
Myrtle Harrold.
11
2434 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
SUSPENSIONS.
Delphi No. 28 — 0. P. Wilson, six months, for drunken-
ness.
Mississinewa No. 96 — Fred A. Ragan, eighteen months, for
drunkenness and insulting a lady.
Anderson No. 131 — R. B. Pettit, six months, for drunken-
ness.
Clinton No. 165 — 0. W. Louden, six months, for drunk-
enness and disorderly conduct.
Clinton No. 165 — G. W. Lowden, six months, for drunk-
enness.
Shannondale No. 187 — W. H. Burroughs, three months, for
conduct unbecoming an Odd Fel-
low.
Tipton No. 220 — J. H. Van Valkenberg, three months,
for profanity.
Gregg No. 235 — C. D. Coughlin, three months, for con-
duct unbecoming an Odd Fellow.
Larwill No. 238 — G. E. Smith, ten months, for drunken-
ness.
Mitchell No. 242— G. W. White, six months, for drunken-
ness.
Utilis No. 260 — James Slack, six months, for using
language unbecoming an Odd Fel-
low.
Spiceland No. 266 — C. W. Griffin, three months, for whip-
ping his daughter.
Charlottsville No. 277 — W. L. Smith, three months, for drunk-
enness.
Monroeville No. 283 — Robert Elliott, twelve months, for
drunkenness and fighting.
Dearfield No. 293 — Frank Sipe, twelve months, for con-
tempt.
Yorktown No. 345 — C. F. Esther, twelve months, for gamb-
ling.
Onward No. 455 — George Helvie, eighteen months, for
drunkenness and wife beating.
Tempa No. 521 — William I. Kelley, three months, for
drunkenness.
Pisgah No. 543— Benjamin McCord, eighteen months, for
using indecent language.
Falmouth No. 568— Charles Sims, eighteen months, for
drunkenness.
Garrett No. 602 — A. W. Beehler, three months, for in-
toxication.
Oriole ..No. 616 — David James, three months, for drunk-
enness.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2435
Milroy No. 654— M. Richey, six months, for using inde-
cent language.
Samaritan No. 658— J. M. Townsend, three months, for de-
serting his wife.
Cedar No. 663 — Alexander Andrews, for conduct un-
becoming an Odd Fellow, time not
stated.
Wiley No. 687— C. M. McCormick, eighteen months,
for conduct unbecoming an Odd
Fellow.
2436
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
EXPULSIONS.
Washington. No. 11-
Fidelity No. 59-
Mississinewa No. 96-
Schiller No. 138-
Cecelia No. 166-
Young America ...No. 243-
Laughery Valley. .No. 246-
Charlottsville No. 277-
Fortuna No. 2^9-
Sharpsville No. 347-
Linden No. 393-
Eel River No. 417-
StarCity No. 442-
Bristol No. 448-
Idaville No. 556-
Richland City . . No. 577-
Oriole No. 616-
Battle Ground No. 659-
Cedar No. 663-
Cedar No. 663-
Velpen No. 675-
Hudson No. 692-
-J. W. Bishop, lor drunkenness and as-
sociating with lewd women.
-Aug. L. Eiler, for forgery.
-Samuel Morton, for public indecency.
-H. Weiler, for contempt.
-H. Massey, for drunkenness.
-Samuel Spitler, for drunkenness and
keeping a saloon.
-F. P. Miller, for drunkenness and con-
duct unbecoming an Odd Fellow.
-L. E. Sample, for contempt.
-William Mueller, for false pretense.
-M. S. Cox, for drunkenness and con-
duct unbecoming an Odd Fellow.
-B. Y. Perkins, for embezzlement.
-W. H. Huff, for abandonment and con-
duct unbecoming an Odd Fellow.
-C. R. Nelson, for fraud.
-A. Storn, for abandonment and de-
sertion.
-C. M. Jones, for drunkenness.
H. McKinney, for fraud and abandon-
ment.
-W. S. Lockard, for keeping a saloon.
-B. A. Boyles, for drunkenness.
-E. Holan, for drunkenness and con-
duct unbecoming an Odd Fellow.
-John Holden, for drunkenness and
conduct unbecoming an Odd Fel-
low.
-James Morton, for abandonment.
-A. Meek, for drunkenness and disor-
derly conduct.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA.
2437
DEATHS.
New Albany No. 1 — John H. Turner, Past Grand.
Jefferson No. 3— A. P. Dustin, Past Grand.
Friendship No. 4 — G. W. Bennett, Past Grand.
Friendship No. 4 — Ernest Smith, Past Grand.
New Albany No. 10— Fred Smith, Third Degree.
New Albany No. 10 — J. P. Hannan, Initatory.
Washington No. 11 — L. V. Fleming, Past Grand.
Fort Wayne No. 14— J. W. Baird, Third Degree.
Fort Wayne No. 14— Williatn H. Brooks, Third Degree.
Fort Wayne No. 14— John Glockle, Third Degree.
Lafayette No. 15— James A. Cole, Past Grand.
Lafayette No. 15— Moses Fox, Third Degree.
Wayne No. 17 — Isaac Clark, Third Degree.
Centre No. 18— Milton Pouder, Third Degree.
Wabash No. 20— P. Coan, Third Degree.
Heneosis Adern...No. 25— E. C. Rudy, Third Degree.
Penn No. 30— C. E. Russell, Third Degree.
Penn No. 30— L. D. Quick, Third Degree.
Penn.. ...No 30 — James Collett, Third Degree.
La Porte No. 36— Lynn Boyd, Third Degree.
Shelby No. 39— S. W. Jones, Third Degree.
Shelby No. 39— Thomas Deval, Third Degree.
Logan No. 40— J. A. Beall, Third Degree.
White Water No. 41 — 0. H. Clark, Third Degree.
Philoxenian No. 44 — H. E. Schaefer, Third Degree.
Philoxenian No. 44 — W. M. Loring, Third Degree.
Philoxenian No 44— J. E. Franklin, Third Degree.
Philoxenian No. 44— D. C. Cravens, Third Degree.
Philoxenian No. 44 — J. W. Axtell, Third Degree.
Philoxenian No. 44— R. E. Shuffleton, Third Degree.
Rochester ..No. 47 — John Kewney, Past Grand.
Miami No. 52- John Toll, Past Grand.
Tippecanoe No. 55 — Beniamin Boyle, Past Grand.
Tippecanoe No. 55— E. E. Anderson, Third Degree.
Chequeuk No. 56— Cyrus Axe, Past Grand.
Columbus No. 58— D. N. Williams, Third Degree.
Columbus No. 58 — M. Bond, Third Degree.
Protection No. 63— T. R Sherwood, Past Grand.
Princeton No. 64— D. G. Powell, Third Degree.
Princeton No. 64 — William R. Criswell, Third Degree.
Ringgold No. 66 — John G. Young, Third Degree.
Salem No. 67 — W. C. Lowden, Third Degree.
Salem No. 67 — Charles Hancock, Past Grand.
Howard No. 71 — J. C. Mann, Third Degree.
Howard No. 71 — J. S. Rogers, Past Grand.
Muncie No. 74 — I. L. Case, Past Grand.
Muncie No. 74 — Charles Schaefer, Third Degree.
2438
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
Johnson No. 76— George Githens, Third Degree.
Johnson No. 76— S. C. Brown, Third Degree.
New Harmony No. 87 — William V. Wiley, Third Degree.
Olive Branch No. 89 — Joseph Reed, Past Grand.
Olive Branch No. 89 — John Barnard, Past Grand.
Americus No. 91 — Robert H. Cox, Third Degree.
Charlestown No. 94— W. A. Patterson, Third Degree.
Charlestown No. 94 — Henry Wright, Third Degree.
Mississinewa No. 96 — J. R. Fitzgerald, Past Grand.
Knightstown No. 99— R. M. Forbes, Third Degree.
James No. 100 — M. Rathsom, Past Grand.
Decatur No 103— T. J. Coy, Third Degree.
Frankfort No. 108— C. Thompson, Third Degree.
Frankfort No. 108— J. D. Norris, Past Grand.
Frankfort. No. 108 — John Kyme, Past Grand.
Liverpool No. 110 — Thomas Brooks, Third Degree.
Liverpool No. 110 — William Ragsdale, Third Degree.
Liverpool No. 110 — John Kempp, Third Degree.
Liverpool No. 1 1 0 — A . A ikman , Third Degree.
Orange No. 113— D.H. Higgins, Past Grand.
Bluffton No. 114— W. S. Heckman, Third Degree.
Bluftton No. 114— J. L. Coflfman, Third Degree.
Crescent No. 122 — G. A. Mauntell, Past Grand.
Crescent No. 122— G. W. Ellanhead, Past Grand.
Crescent No. 122— J. J. McCourt. Third Degree.
Capital No. 124— D. W. Ragsdale, Third Degree.
Capital No. 124 — Samuel L. Fisher, Past Grand.
Capital No. 124— F. P. Peacock, Third Degree.
Capital No. 124— E. V. Herryman, Third Degree.
Germania No. 129— C. Reitzel, Past Grand.
Germania No. 129 — Fred Deitz, Past Grand. ■
Germania, No. 129 — J. Remacher, First Degree.
Kokomo No. 133 — Henry Hunt, Third Degree.
Kokomo No. 133 — C. W. Crumbaugh, Third Degree.
Greenfield No. 135— H. Bohm, Third Degree.
Worthington No. 137 — W. C. Andrews, Past Grand.
Worthington No. 137 — George Wills, Past Grand.
Everton No. 138— James White, Third Degree.
Spencer No. 140—1. Wright, Third Degree.
Owen No. 146— C. Crouch, Past Grand.
Owen No. 146— H. S. Seay, Third Degree.
Morton No. 155 — William Samuels, Past Grand.
Fort Harrison No. 157— Z. T. Bosley, Third Degree.
Fort Harrison No. 157— G. W. Hamilton, Past Grand.
Fort Harrison No. 157— D. S. Huston, Third Degree.
Fort Harrison No. 157— F. Brittlebank, Third Degree.
Star in the West.. .No. 159— C. A. Jones, Past Grand.
Cecelia No. 166- C. F. Dodds, Past Grand.
Cecelia No. 166 — J. W. Berry man. Past Grand.
Carroll No. 174— J. C. Bell, Past Grand.
Edwards No. 178 — H. Humphrey, Third Degree.
Shannondale No. 187 — S. M. Freeman, Third Degree.
Wildey No. 191— T. D. Gregar, Third Degree.
Hiawatha No. 193 — Edward Courtney, Past Grand.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2439
Purity No. 194 — J. Montgomery, Past Grand.
Greenwood No. 198— Henry Todd, Third Degree.
Greenwood No. 198— C. F. Fix, Past Grand.
Bourbon No. 203— D. Walmer, Past Grand.
Seymour No. 204— C. Able, Third Degree.
Seymour No. 204 — A. Rosenberg, Past Grand.
Tell City No. 206— F. Meisner, Third Degree.
Tell City No. 206— F. Raess, Third Degree.
Tell City No. 206— C. T. Schlotfield, Past Grand.
Tell City No. 206— John Feir, Past Grand.
Woodward.. No. 21 2 -M. O'Connor, Third Degree.
Woodward No. 212- D. S. Bellis, First Degree.
Crawfordsville No. 223 — James Gaspell, Third Depree,
Concordia No. 228— Chris Laible, Third Degree.
Adullum No. 229— F. E. Miller, Past Grand.
Humboldt No. 234— John H. Auss, Third Degree.
Gregg No. 235 — J. A. Burnes, Third Degree.
Star No. 236— P. A. Harroll, Third Degree.
Star No. 236— John E. Smith, Third Degree.
Larwill No. 238— J. N. Clayton, Initiatory.
York No. 241— J. H. Owens, Past Grand.
Mitchell No. 242— Hugh McNabb, Past Grand.
Trenton No. 248 — John X. Rogers, Past Grand.
Richmond No. 254-7D. L. Gorman, Third Degree.
Richmond No. 254— J. C. Fry or. Initiatory.
Utilis ^.No. 260 — Henry Essman, Past Grand.
Caldwell No. 271— R. S. Drummond, Third Degree.
Monroeville No. 2S3— W. H. Wright, Past Grand,
Zionsville No. 285 — W. A. Denson, Past Grand.
Magenta No. 288 -V. T. Clement, Past Grand.
Magenta No. 288— S. Sidney Reed, Past Grand.
Fortuna No. 289— M. Schotter, Past Grand.
Deerfield No. 293— W. B. Smiley, Third Degree.
Rockfield No. 301— U. W. Van Tundy, Past Grand.
Dunkirk No. 306 — T. M. Lister, Past Grand.
Daleville ; No. 309— J. L. Thomas, Past Grand.
Kendallville No. 316— A. B. Park, Third Degree.
Loon Creek No. 322— T. H. Lee, Third Degree.
Dunreith No. 341 — J. S. Bungard, Third Degree.
Greenville No. 344 — Julius Garot, Third Degree.
Goodland No. 346 -J. T. Wilson, Past Grand.
Greencastle No. 348 — D. L. Peter, Past Grand.
Greencastle No. 348 — J. A. Johnston, Third Degree.
Newtonville No. 353— J. C. Gilham, Third Degree.
Neries No. 358— W. R. Smith, Past Grand.
Warrick No. 379 — H. Ingrim, Third Degree.
Grantsburg No. 407 — John Thorne, Third Degree.
Grantsburg No. 407 — M. D. Dillman, Third Degree.
Warrington No. 411 — William Trees, Past Grand.
Staunton No. 415— B. F Willoughby, Past Grand.
Staunton No. 415 — J. M. Huffman, Past Grand.
Eel River No. 417— W. C. Gundell, Past Grand.
Eel River No. 417 — H. C. Hammontree, Third Degree.
Eel River No. 417— A. L. Zook, Third Degree.
2440 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
New Corner No. 425— C. F. Besser, Past Grand.
Atlanta No. 445— C. L. Patton, Third Degree.
Boswell No. 463— W. H. Hufferman, Third Degree.
Newark No. 467— J. Roudebush, Third Degree.
Sandborn No. 468 — J. A. Delay, Third Degree.
Homer No. 471— J. R. Warfield, Third Degree.
Ben Adhem No. 472— R. Colgrove, Third Degree.
Summitville No. 475— Charles S. Waim, Past Grand.
Vigo No. 476— A. S. Paddock, Past Grand.
Midway No. 481— G. W. McVey, Past Grand.
Brownstown No. 488— R. J. Winscott, Past Grand.
Burrows No. 495— M. H. Smith, Past Grand.
Evening Star No. 503— William Vandenbark, Third Degree.
Tempi No. 521— W. J. Husk, Third Degree.
Coal City No. 522— J. P. Houck, Third Degree.
Mozart No. 531 — George Noerr, Third Degree.
Heltonville No. 533 — J. D. Browning, Past Grand.
Valeene No. 558 — A. Fagan, Past Grand.
Clarksburg No. 559— Hugh McDonald, Third Degree
Kent No. 570— C. E. Stutsman, Third Degree.
Bee No. 572— E. E. Killion, Third Degree
Bee No. 572— William H. Crosby, Third Degree.
Noble No. 573— J. E. McCarty, Third Degree.
Elizabeth No. 578— John Jansen, Third Degree.
Cardonia No. 589— George Burt, Third Degree.
Cardonia No. 589 — William Lowrey, Third Degree.
Hymerfl No. 603 — David Stiltz, Initiatory.
Bird's-Eye No. 604— M. J. Waddle, Third Degree.
South Milforrl....-..No. 619— C. C. Bartlett, Third Degree.
Valley No. 627 -D. W. Place, Past Grand.
New Amsterdam ..No. 629 — J. H. Bennett, Third Degree.
New Amsterdam... No. 629 — L. Friedley, Third Degree.
Unity No. 637 — Andrew Gastineau, Third Degree.
Moltke No. 676-C. Brunswick, Initiatory.
GRAND LODGE OF INDIANA. 2441
DIGEST OF LAWS AND DECISIONS.
Decisions —
Of Grand Master 2312, 2313
On amending Chapter IV, Section 13 of the General
Laws 2320,2381
STANDING RESOLUTIONS.
1. Resolved, That the Grand Secretary be and he is hereby in-
structed to keep on hand, at all times, a sufficient quantity of cards
and supplies to answer all calls for the same from Subordinate
Lodges.
2. Resolved, That the hour of 10 o'clock of the second day's ses-
sion be assigned at the semi annual and annual communications for
the exemplification of the unwritten work by Grand Repre-
sentatives.
3. Resolved, That at the semi-annual sessions the nomination of
officers shall be next in order after the exemplification of the un-
written work, and at the annual session the nomination and elec-
tion of officers shall follow immediately after the exemplification of
the unwritten work.
4. Resolved, That the report of the Grand Representatives be
made through the Grand Secretary, and be referred to a Special or
Standing Committee for distribution, without "being read, unless
otherwise ordered by a majority vote of the Grand Lodge.
5. Resolved, That after the terms of the present Grand Officers
have expired, services as Grand Master shall not of itself be consid-
ered as establishing any claim to an election to the office of Grand
Representative.
{Proceedivgs Grand Lodge, November Session, 1888.
RESOLUTIONS OF SOVEREIGN GRAND LODGE.
Resolved, That a member of the Order in good standing, evi-
denced by holding an unexpired visiting card, issued in conformity
to the laws of the Order by his Lodge or Encampment, and having
the A. T. P. W., being in distress, or pretending so to be, and need-
ing money, and who, having asked for and received from a Lodge
or Encampment, or a member thereof, a sum of money, under the
assurance and promise that he will return or repay the same within
a given time, or as soon as he returns home, but who shall neglect
so to do after a reasonable time thereafter, without a satisfactory
excuse being rendered, shall be deemed guilty of conduct unbe-
2442 PROCEEDINGS OF THE
coming an Odd Fellow ; and due notice of such facts having been
officially communicated to his Lodge by the Lodge or Encampment
so loaning him the money, it shall be the duty of his Lpdge to no-
tify him of such indebtedness or loan, and to demand payment
thereof, and if he then refuses or neglects to pay the same, his Lodge
shall prefer charges against him, try him, and if found guilty, and
without sufficient mitigating circumstances, to expel him from the
Order. If there be such mitigating circumstances, then to impose
such penalty as the Lodge may deem best.
Resolved, That the respective State Grand Lodges cause the fore-
going resolution to be embodied in their proceedings, and the at-
tention of the Subordinate Lodges and Encampments especially
called to it. {Proceedings 3. G. L. U. S., 1874, pages 6310, 6326.)
INDKX.
PAGE.
Adjournment — Grand Lodge 2397
Appeals — Report of Committee —
J. T. Burton vs. Herndon Lodge, No. 95 2322-2324
William Kiser vs. Wayne Lodge, No. 17. 2324-2326
John Males vs. Morgan Lodge, No. 211 2326-2328
L. M. Stevens vs. Richland City Lodge, No. 577 2328
B. F. Carl vs. Salamonie Lodge, No. 392 2328-2330
Sheridan Lodge, No. 691, vs. Delphi Lodge, No. 28 2330-2331
Aaron Chamberlain vs.Grand Prairie Lodge, No. 164 2331
S. J. Hinkle vs. Saratoga Lodge, No. 703 2331, 2332
Adam W. Meeks vs. Hudson Lodge, No. 692 2332-2334
W. H. Fisher vs. Johnson Lodge, No. 76 2334,2335
Thomas Williamson vs. Utilis Lodge, No. 260 2335
G. B. Havens vs. Warrick Lodge, No. 379 2336,2337
Rossville Lodge, No. 183, vs. John J. Fisher 2337, 2338
Ashboro Lodge, No. 251, vs. Centre Point Lodge,
No. 700 2338,2339
Daniel Emery vs. Oakland Lodge, No. 534 2339
Aaron B. Templeton vs. Capital Lodge, No. 124... 2340, 2341
Indianapolis Lodge, No. 465, vs. George W. Bone.. 2341, 2354
John Vanzant vs. Richmond Lodge, No. 254 2341,2342
George W. Pitts vs. Philoxenian Lodge, No. 44 2343
M. Gish vs. Covington Lodge, No. 21 2343,2344
Memorial of Bro. Alpheus Morris 2344,2345
Charles Mund vs. Moltke Lodge, No. 674 2345
L. H. Willis vs. Sullivan Lodge, No. 147 2345-2347-2356
Reuben Koonts vs. Greensboro Lodge, No. 247 2347, 2348
E. G. Coverdale vs. St. Mary's Lodge, No. 167 2348
J. R. Sutherlin, D. D. G.'M. Ex parte 2349,2350
G. W. White vs. Mitchell Lodge, No. 242 2350
J. T. McShane vs. Carmel Lodge, No. 401
2351-2354-2357-2365-2369
2444 INDEX.
PAGE.
Appendix —
Reports of Subordinate Lodges for the term end-
ing December 31, 1894 2400-2417
Officers of Subordinate Lodges for the term com-
mencing January 1, 1895 241^-2427
Officers of Rebekah Lodges for the term com-
mencing January 1, 1895 2428-2433
Suspensions 2434,2435
Expulsions ; 2436
Deaths 2437-2440
Digest of Laws and Decisions 2441,2442
Committees —
Credentials.
Appointment of 2290
Report of 2290-2302,2365
Degree of Rebekah.
On Grand Master's report granting certain char-
ters for Rebekah Lodges 2378,2379
On petition for new Rebekah Lodge at Aurora 2379
On petition for new Rebekah Lodge at Silver Lake 2379
On petition of Lawrence Rebekah Lodge, No. 388.. 2379, 2380
On By-Laws of Rebekah Lodges, No. 465 and 467.. 2380
Finance and Accounts.
On books of Grand Secretary and Grand Treasurer 2322
On books Grand Lodge Hall Trustees 2322
On allowance of certain claims 2374, 2375
Legislative.
On amending Chapter IV, Section 13 of General
Laws 2.320-2381
On question presented by Edward's Lodge, No. 178 2362-2374
On amending Article II, Section 2 of the Constitu-
tion 2363-2380
On amending Chapter IV, Section 41, General
Laws 2363-2364
On decisions of the Grand Master 2371,2372
On amending Article I, Section 3 of the Constitu-
tion 2372
Mileage and Per Diem.
Report of 2382-2396
On Printing.
Report of committee 2321
2445
Petitions.
On Grand Master's report granting dispensations
for Nos. 711, 712 and 713 2358
On petition of Manchester Lodge, No. 283 2358
On petition of Monroeville Lodge, No. 283 2358
On petition of certain Lodges for reinstations 2359
On granting duplicate charters to No. 509 and 572 2359
On petition of Kossuth Lodge, No. 81 2360
On petition of Van Buren Lodge, No. 633 2360
On petition of Pleapantville Lodge, No. 408 2360
On petitions of Nos. 115 and 583 for charge of loca-
tion 2361
On petition of Liberty Lodge, No. 710 2361- 2362-2369
On petition of Hardinsburg Lodge, No. 501 2362
On circular letter of Grand Master of Wyoming.... 2378
Standing 2307-2309
On the State of the Order —
On Grand Master's report with reference to Or-
phans' Home 2355
On papers of Grand Master relating to North Da-
kota 2369
On Grand Master's report with reference to the Odd
Fellows' Home 2370
On statement of Richmond Lodge, No. 254 2370, 2371
On amending Article II, Section 2, of the Consti-
tution 2371
Subordinate Lodge Constitutions and By Laws—
On By-Laws of Alamo Lodge, No. 230 2376
On By-Laws of Young America Lodge, No. 243 2376
On By-Laws of Cardonia Lodge, No. 589 2376
On By-Laws of Star Lodge No. 236 2377
On By-Laws of Golden Star Rebekah Lodge, No.
452 2377
On By-Laws of Manchester Lodge, No. 613 2378
Exemplification of Unwritten Work 2372
Nomination of Officers 2372, 2373
Opening of Grand Lodge 2289
Report of Grand Master 2309-2313
Report of Grand Secretary 2313-2317
Report of Grand Treasurer 2317-2318
Report of Grand Lodge Hall Trustees 2319-2320
2446 INDEX.
FACE.
Proof Reader —
Appointment of 2309
Fraternal Greetings —
From Grand Lodge of Ohio 2321
Kesponse to Grand Lodge of Ohi. 2357
Notice of Appeal 2369
Eesolutions —
Of fraternal sympathy for Bro. W. H. Talbott, P.
G. M 2309
On distributing Grand Master's Report 2313
On granting use of Grand Lodge to Grand Lodge
Knights of Pythias 2320
On compensation of the Grand Treasurer 2374
That Grand Representatives be instructed to sus-
tain the new Rebekah law in the Sovereign
Grand Lodge 2380
On instructions to Secretaries of Nos. 401, 691 and
285 2381
GRAND MASTERS.
^Joseph Barkley, No. 1, New Albany 1837
*Richard D. Evans, No. 1, New Albany 1838
<'William Ford, No. 2, Madison 1839
^Christian Bucher, No. 2, Madison 1840
John Neal, No. 4, Rising Sun 1841
*James W. Hinds, No. 2, Madison 1842
=>Noah H. Cobb, No. 10, New Albany 1843
William Cross, No. 3, Jefforsonyille 1844
*JohnH. Taylor, No. 2, Madison 1845
*Joel B. McFarland, No. 15, Lafayette 1846
John Green, No. 40, Logansport 1847
^Philander B. Brown, No. 21, Covington 1848
*Job B. Eldridge, No. 21, Logansport 1849
■•i-Milton Herndon, No. 38, Crawfordsville....l850
*01iver Dufour, No. 6, Vevay 1851
*Joseph L. Silcox, No. 39, Shelbyville 1852,
*Wm. K. Edwards, No. 51, Terra Haute 1853
^Oliver P. Morton, No. 23, Centreville 1854
John B. Anderson, No. 83, New Albany. ...1855
""James H. Stewart, No. 28, Delphi 185C
■>?. A. Hackleman, No. 35, Rushville 1857
A. H. Mathews, No. 36, Laporte 1858
'-Thomas Underwood, No. 15, Lafayette 1859
*Sol Meredith, No. 17, Cambridge City 1860
*William H. Dixon, No. 92, JeflFersonville...l861
* Jonathan S. Harvey, No. 44, Indianapolis....l862
<"Denuis Gregg, No. l. New Albany 1683
Harvey D. Scott, No. 51, Terre Haute 1864
<'Thos. B. McCarty, No. 46, Wabash 1865
Joseph A. Funk, No. 62, Warsaw 1S66
i-John T. Sanders, No. 3, Jeffersonville 1867
>S. L. Adams, No. 123, Danville 1868
J. A. Wildman, No. 133, Kokomo 186S
W. H. DeWolf, No. 20, Vineennes 1870
*J. W. McQuiddy, No. 1, New Albany 1871
Piatt J. Wise, No. 14, Fort Wayne 1872
'^'Richard Owen, No. 87, New Harmony 1873
D. B. Shideler, No. 82, Jonesboro 1874
J. B. Kimball, No. 316, Kendallville 1875
i=Leonidas Sexton, No. 35, Rushville 1876
W. R. Myers, No. 131, Anderson 1877
Enoch Cox, No. 28, Delphi 1878
■••■D. W. LaFoUette, No. 83, New Albany 1879
Will Cumback, No. 103, Greensburg 1880
N. P. Richmond, No. 133, Kokomo 1881
S. P. Oyler, No. 76, Franklin 1882
*II. McCoy, No. 520, Indianapolis 1883
John F. Wildman, No. 131, Muucie 1884
J. B. Kenner, No. 42, Huntington 1885
A. N. Grant, No. 295, Kokomo 1886
L. T. Miehener.No. 39, Shelbyville 1887
J. E. C. F. Harper, No. 93, Madison 1888
C. C. Binkley, No. 41 1889
W. H. Leedy, No. 465 1890
U. Z. Wiley, No. 460 1891
Enoch G. Hogate 1892
Will H. Talbott 1893
M. A. Chipman, Anderson 1894
GRAND SECRETARIES.
*Jared C. Joceyln, No. 1, New Albany 1837
Nicholas Karns, No. 1, New Albany 1838-39
Lewis L. Garner, No. 1, New Albany....- 1840
*A. C. Christfield, No. 2, Madison 1840-41
*E. S. Ayres, No. 2, Madison 1841-42
?fB. B. Taylor, No. 2, Madison 1842-43
A. S. Berryhill, No. l,New Albany 1843-44
«John H. Taylor, No. 2, Madison. 1844-4&
*S. W. Cayce, No. l,New Albany 1845-46
'-John Dixon, No. 3, Jeffersonville 1846-47
•-Laz. Noble, No. 23, Centreville 1847-50
Willis W. Wright, No. 44, Indianapolis..l850-58
*E. H Barry, No. 35, Rushville 1858-71
B. F. Foster, No. 11, Madison 1871-94
GRAND TREASURERS.
*John Evans, No. 1, New Albany 1837
*William Clark, No. 1, New Albany 1838-39
*John Verry, No. 2, Madison 1840-41
*Wm. Ford, No. 2, Madison.......... 1841-42
♦Deceased,
*Geo. Brown, No. 2, Madison 1842-46
Thos. S. Saylor, No. 2, Madison 1843-46
*Jacob B. McChesney, No. 18, Ind'p'l's 1846-59
Theo. P. Haugbey, No. 124, Ind'p'l's 1859-92
James A. Wildman 1894
Price of Books, Cards, Etc,
Subordinate Lodge Rituals, per copy .... o,.. $2.20
Degree Rebekah Rituals, per copy z.20
Degree Charts . 2.20
Subordinate Lodge Floor Work 40
Rebekah Lodge Floor Work • • . . . .40
Secretary's Receipt Books, per copy . 2.00
Treasurer's Order Bm)ks 2.00
Treasurer's Receipt Books „ 2.00
Initiation Registers ..... ,. 1. 75
Visitors' Registers . l.oc
Officers' Roll Books . . . , , <, 1. 00
Book of Forms 0 . 1. 00
Members' Diplomas ,...,■ 75
Visiting and Withdrawal Cards, per dozen 3.00
Visiting and Withdrawal Cards, Degree of Rebekah, per dozen . . 3.0c
Dismissal Certificates, Degree of Rebekah, per dozen 3 00
Dismissal Certificates, per dozen 3 00
Wife and Widows' Cards, per dozen ..... 3 00
Odes, Subordinate Lodge, per dozen .-: . . 50
Odes, Subordinate Lodge, with Music (10 cents each), per dozen . . 1 20
Book of Odes, Subordinate Lodge, Encampment and Degree of
Rebekah, with Music, per copy 60
Odes, Degree of Rebekah, per dozen 50
Odes, Degree of Rebekah, with Music (10, cents each), per dozen . 1.20
Anniversary Ceremonies, per dozen 3 00
Funeral Ceremony, with Responses, per dozen 3 00
Funeral Ceremony, Daughters of Rebekah (15 cents single copy),
per dozen , 1.50
Memorial and Decoration Ceremony, Combined (25 cents each), per
dozen 3 00
Anniversary Odes, per dozen . .50
Funeral Odes, with Responses, per dozen ............ .50
Digest Sovereign Grand Lodge, per copy ... ........ 3.00
Digest Grand Lodge of Indiana, per copy . ........... 1. 00
General Laws, paper cover (15 cents single copy), per dozen .... 1.50
Forms of Incorporation, per dozen .30
Forms of Petition for Membership, Subordinate Lodges, per dozen, .30
Forms of Petition for Membership, Rebekah Lodges, per dozen . . .15
Veteran Jewels, Subordinate and Rebekah 4.00
Blank Orders for P. W., per dozen ............... ,30
The MOXET mn^tt accompanj^ all orders for any of the above
snpplieM. ISnbordinate Liodg'e and Rebekah Rituals can be sent
by express only, or by any accredited member.
Secretaries of JLodg^es -will please note the following resoln°
tion :
"Resolved, That Grand Scribes and Grand Secretaries are hereby prohibited from
delivering or transmitting Visiting or Witlidrawal Cards to any person whatever, or
to any Encampment or Lodge, excepting upon the order, in writing, of an Encamp-
ment or Lodge, signed by its Scribe (in the case of ah Encampment), or by its Secre-
tary (iu case of a Lodge), and authenticated by the official seal of the Encampment
or Lodge."— Journal G. L. U. S., p. 3478.
All orders for snpplies must be sigrned by the Secretary and
attested b.y the seal ot the liOdge, and must state whether to
send by M4.IL. or KXPRK.SS. If by MAIL., send the requisite
number of STAMPS to prepay the postage. If by EXPRESS
state to ^vhat office or ^tation, and to ^vhose care.
Enclose a stamp in all letters requiring a replyo
ii^ESSiifiRn^
»Slllill^iiS>Hira®3£
DX®>^DtiK®|Bf CAAS €3I£|
IIISfSQIIil
IIHB
flJUl^
dSlllBBSflSIII
Sll
ryyyi
t>xm}^miii9f^ eAA9
01
I ^•S!UI ■
iiiasQiiiiiaiB
ssiimn^ie^iiin