Skip to main content

Full text of "Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London"

See other formats


2 Pi Pe Bet 
Pe a 

AU ine 
vy ely 


bay de 4 
Sy aneee 
4 


Sip. on 

ty “s Neko 8, Sense 14) 

A 400 Heb ee al ee 
Wl bier de Pern 

Sakis dae Che 


ran 
Wig a hd ena HW 


4 
Ss ae IE RAN attest 


‘ ; 
ee fete Rv ir sehewen ww 
BY 


Pion " aM we deem at a aan ia 

Ms Ra > A | ¥ + 4 

Cay NN) One w aes Ve “yu on be a biphes auts 
a) r ’ saab ek Ree, 


ea i 
Se 
ath 


sate urea ht A Sin 7 Sy aaa dat 
dan Res ! Ee Ty ig Co 
: Gita 


eecety eee 
sate 
naa 


ie BWA 
" 


’ 
viet it Geel 
3 te ben de 
ead 
uk 


3, 


ia 
ila 
ie 


ep fiee yep Sv SDA, 
cor 


iP una A 
aN y04 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


GENERAL MEETINGS FOR SCIENTIFIC BUSINESS 


OF THE 


ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY 


OF LONDON. 


/ f 
C4 


( p “ie ee 
1914, pp. 491-1077, 


witH 33 Puates and 129 TExtr-FIGURES. 


PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY, 
SOLD AT ITS HOUSE IN REGENT’S PARK. 
LONDON: 


MESSRS. LONGMANS, GRHEN, AND Co,, 


PATERNOSTER ROW. 


DAES 


lilt coeel 


OF THE 


COUNCIL 


AND OF FLOE RS 


OF THE 


ZOOLOGICAL 


SOCIETY 


OF LONDON. 


1914. 


Patron. 
His Masgesty THe Kina. 


COUNCIL. 
His Grace Tae Duke or Beprorp, K.G., F.R.S8., President. 


Ricard H. Burnt, Esq.,M.A., 
Vice-President. 

ALFRED H. Cocks, Esq., M.A. 
THe Rr. Hon. tur Ear. or 
Cromer. VPC.) G:CsB,, 

CeCvivGe eK Cis. I: 
Vice-President. 

F. G. Dawtrey Drewirr, Esq., 
M.A., M.D. 

CHarLes DrumMonp, 
Treasurer. 

THe Earu or Dunmore, V.C., 
M.V.O. 

Sir Waurer Roper LAwreNcE 


>) 


Esq., 


? 


Bt., G.C.L.K., Vice-President. | 


Ernest W. MacBrips, Esq., 
Mes. 2Se, URS. WVice- 


President. 


elas. ? 
|W. R. Octtvie-Grantv, Esq. 


EK. G. B. Mrapr- W Avo, Esa. 
Prof. Epwarp A. Muncuin, 
M.A., F.R.S., Vice-President. 
P. Cuatmers MircHeEyu, Esq., 
MA. DSc, LEDS Shakes 


Secretary. 


ABert Pam, Esq. 

ApRIAN D. W. Potxock, Esa. 

THe EaAru or PortsmoutH. 

THe Marquess oF Suico, 
F.S.A. 

OLDFIELD Tomas, Esq., F.R.S. 

ANTHONY H. WHuINGFIEDD, 
Ksq. 

Henry Woopwarp, Ksq., LL.D., 
ELRAS., Vice-President. 


PRINCIPAL OFFICERS, 


P. Cuatmers Mircnrnz, M.A., D.Sc., bab, 


Seeretary. 


Frank E. Bepparp, M.A., D.Sc.. F.R.S., Prosector. 


R. I. Pocock, F.R.S., F.L.S., 


Curator of Mammals and 


Tesident Superintendent of the Gardens. 
D. Sera-Smivu, Curator of Birds and Inspector of Works. 
Epwarp G. Bourencer, Curator of Reptiles. 
Prof. H. Maxwett Lerroy, Curator of Insects. 
- Henry G. Purnen, F.R.S., M.R.GS., Pathologist. 
Henry G. J. Peavor, Librarian and Clerk of Publications. 


Joun Barrow, Accountant. 
W. H. COLE, Chief Clerk. 


‘ 
/ 


LIS? OF CONTENTS. 


1914, pp. 491-1077. 


EXHIBITIONS AND NOTICES. 


The Szcrerary. Report on the Additions to the Society’s 
Menagerie during the month Olean OAS meet 2 


Mr. J. Taornton Carter, F.Z.8. Exhibition of Micro- 
photographs of Mitosis in the Cells of the Enamel 
Organ in Dasyurus viverrinus and Trichosurus vul- 
PACONGTRR ESOL Ge 2 BOR ne aOR BACHE ery URE HER OER i rere rere 


Mr. R. I. Pocock, F.R.S., F.LS., F.Z.S., Curator of 
Mammals. Exhibition of a white specimen of 
Poumuermes: Gazelle jase. tease a. ween adceee . seers 


The Rev. T. R. R. Sreppine, M.A., F.R.S., F.Z.8. Huval- 
lentinia, nom. n. for Vallentinia Stebbing............... 


The Secretary. Report on the Additions to the Society’s 
Menagerie during the months of June, July, August, 
MINOW pS\@) OUST OSTEND ee airline Bees Or cla: Aare Mer nReeeen ae 


Mr. R. H. Burne, M.A., V.P.Z.8. Exhibition of some adap- 
tations for the nourishment of embryos of Hlasmo- 
| TEATS 0S SRE b atone Breet Ca NEE Rea ne Oe ns Ben 


Mr. R. E. Savace. Exhibition of two abnormal Herrings. 


Messrs. EK. Heron-Apuen, F.LS., F.Z.8., and Arrnur 
Eartanp, F.R.M.S. Notice’ of Memoir on the 
Foraminifera of the Kerimba Archipelago, obtained 
by Dr, J. J. Simpson in the years 1907-8 ............ 


Page 


943 


943 


944 


944 


iv 


Mr. W. L. Disraxt. Notice of Repost on Rhynchota 
collected by the Wollaston Expedition in Dutch New 
(CUFTINry aio sat ade bobaieeates onpeaneasuse IsBtenennd snoddoonronots 


‘The Sucrerary. Report on the Additions to the Society's 
Menagerie during the month of October 1914 ......... 


The Secretary. Exhibition of a photograph of Oysters 
erowing upon mangroves at Lobito Bay, Portuguese 
Wiest Aitisi@a Wek ee no tcee eee soaastc na la! sam eench)aethe eee 


Mr. RB. H. Burne, M.A., V.P.Z.S. Exhibition of Simu- 
ibveren, ose Wikollllinisreria SINAIS, (oc cancsoccosnossconotndacaoacnadec 


Mr. H. BR. Hoee, M.A., F.Z.S. Notice of Report on the 
Spiders collected by the British Ornithologists’ Union 
and Wollaston Expeditions in Dutch New Guinea... 


Mr. Lewis H. James, B.A., F.Z.S. Notes upon the birth of 
a Porpoise at the Brighton Aquarium .................. 


Mr. BR. I. Pocock, F.R.S., F.L8., F.Z.8., Curator of 
Mammals. Exhibition showing some new points of 
difference between Pine and Beech Martens. (Text- 
ined nnetss EME Oh eee haope eocecneccsostucbaroddbsaneatbceoscousdise 


Mr. E. T. Newton, F.R.S., F.Z.S. Exhibition of bones of 
animals showing indications of natural repair, and 
some teeth of a female Physeter 


Messrs. E. Heron-Auten, F.LS., F.Z.S., and Arraur 
Earuann, F.R.M.S. Exhibition and Discussion on 
‘“ Purpose” and ‘“ Intelligence” in the Foraminifera. 


Mr. D. Sers-Suirs, F.Z.S8., Curator of Birds. Exhibition 
of an Egg of the New Guinea Rifle-bird (Puilorhis 
intercedens) laid in the Society's Gardens ............... 

Dr. Rosrerr Broom, C.M.Z.S. Exhibition of Mammalian 
Skulls showing Dental Variations ................... 

Dr. Rogert Broom, C.M.Z.S. ‘Exhibition of the Skull of 
a new Thecodont Reptile from South Africa. (Text- 
figures 1 & 2.) 


Cee decade rere emt anscececr ace ensececesee 


Page 


1060 


1060 


1061 


1061 


1061 


1061 


1062 


1069 


1069 


33. 


34. 


35. 


36. 


38. 


39. 


40. 


41. 


PAPERS. 


The Courtship-habits of the Great Crested Grebe 
(Podiceps cristatus); with an addition to the Theory 
of Sexual Selection. By Jurian 8. Huxtey, B.A., 
Professor of Biology in the Rice Institute, Houston, 
Texcarsamm (Ilaibes ae vcz dis) SS ES cole alte aa sabe cess 


On the Species of Alastor (Paralastor) Sauss., and some 
other Hymenoptera of the Family Eumenide. By 
R. C. L. Perxins, M.A., D.Sc., F.Z.S. (Plate I.) ... 


A Report on the Fauna of the Monte Bello Islands. 
By P. D. Monracur, B.A., Gonville and Caius 
College, Cambridge. (Plates I—-IV.)..............0c00008 


Stalk-eyed Crustaceans collected at the Monte Bello 
Islands. By Mary J. Rarapun, United States 
National Museum, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. (Plates 
IES ip ELS) WR eae, eats} see AC a A ee 


- Report on Mollusca collected at the Monte Bello 


Islands. By Tom Irepate. (Text-figure 1.) ......... 


Cephalopoda from the Monte Bello Islands. By G. C. 
RGESON, (Bo AG (Mext-teumecl.) 22 5. aeniss gar tas 2 anie=' 


Description of a new Lizard from the Canary Islands. 
Biya eeu UME SWr ss ania cocettesaesenon: cae stcte casas 


The Mechanism of Suction in the Potato Capsid Bug, 
Lygus pabulinus Linn. By P. R. Awart, B.A. (Can- 
tab.), D.I.C. (Lond.), Sir John Wolfe-Barry Research 
Scholar, Imperial College of Science, London. (Text- 
mieiees SC HOL)) warned sl See ag sors Ae Parasia Seige se scyoe 


Procolophon trigoniceps, a Cotylosaurian Reptile from 
South Africa. By D. M.S. Warson, M.S8c., F.Z.8., 
Lecturer on Vertebrate Paleontology in University 
College, London. (Plates I-III., and Text-figures 
1] thio) ee On cea ee eA mabe Nel geiko Ors Ea re See 


P 


Lon 
age 


491 


4) 


63 


(or) 
bo 
Or 


6 


6 


6 


6 


ay) 


65 


17 


81 


45. 


44, 


46. 


48, 


AQ, 


Vi 


. he Deinocephalia, an Order of Mammal-like Reptiles. 


By D. M.S. Watson, M.Sc., F.Z.S., Lecturer on Verte- 
brate Paleontology in University College, London. 
(Plates IV., V., and Text-figures AKSS Meas Sones sane 


Diagnoses of New Genera and Species of Zonitide from 
Equatorial Africa. By H. B. Prusrox, F.ZS. 
(U2) biitsiof EIB) ieee ssaanpe daddeuasorabnrpchoéaabendoncbooco pon 


On a second Collection of Batrachians and Reptiles 
made by Dr. H. G. F. Spurrell, F.Z.5., in the Choco, 
Colombia. By G. A. BounencEr, F.R.S., F.Z.8. 
(LEE Ri ese ea Oe Aso neMeRanSanRBe onausebopaconaobecseagnds00< 


. Zoological Results of the Third Tanganyika Expedition, 


conducted by Dr. W. A. Cunnington, 1904-1905,.—- 
Report on the Parasitic Hucopepoda. By WinuiAM 
A. Cunnineton, M.A., Ph.D., F.Z.S. (Plate L., and 
Mexbomoume ge). so oie chats ea noe ae once eee eee 


The Marine Fauna of British Kast Africa and Zanzibar, 
from Collections made by Cyril Crossland, M.A., 
B.Sc., F.Z.8., in the Years 1901-1902. Bryozoa 
Cyclostomata, Ctenostomata, and Endoprocta. By 
Artur Wm. Waters, F.L.S., F.G.8. (Plates I-IV., 
and Text-figure 1.) 


Cer ew meee ete s eect eens ese snc es occ ease ress e 


. Contributions to the Anatomy and Systematic Arrange- 


ment of the Cestoidea.—XIV. On a new Species of 
thabdometra, and on the Paruterine Organ in Oti- 
ditema. By Frank E. Bepparp, M.A., D.Sc., F.R.S., 
F.Z.8., Prosector to the Society. (Text-figures 1-11.) 


On the Facial Vibrisse of Mammalia. By R. I. 
Pocock, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.Z.8., Curator of Mammals. 
(Text-figures 1-13.) 


\c)e/sieleie:p/ei¢isis/eia\e}e je cjaiylejeieiejajsle/elalainie)syele?aicievetate 


On the Feet and other External Features of the Canidse 
and Urside. By R. I. Pococx, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.ZS., 
Curator of Mammals. (Text-figures 1-13.) 


- A remarkable new Cirripede from the Chalk of Surrey 


and Hertfordshire. By Tuomas H, Wiruers, F.G.S. 
(Plate L., and 'Text-fignre tS) 


#018 6) 0,)6)9\0\(0. 0/40 an e)els\e sisneldvale itinerary, 


Page 


787 


813 


819 


831 


859 


889 


51. 


52. 


53. 


o4. 


55. 


Vil 


Polycheta from the N.H. Pacific: The Chetopteride. 
With an Account of the Phenomenon of Asexual 
Reproduction in Phyllochetopterus and the Description 
of Two new Species of Cheetopteride from the Atlantic. 
By F. A. Porrs, M.A., Fellow of Trinity Hall, 
Cambridge, and Balfour Student of the University. 
(Plates I1.—VI., and Text-figures 1-i3.).................. 


Broomia perplexa, gen. et sp. n., a Fossil Reptile from 
South Africa. By D. M.S. Watson, M.S8c., F.Z.8., 
Lecturer on Vertebrate Paleontology in University 
College, London. (Plates VI., and Text-figures 1-5.) 


Hunotosaurus africanus Seeley, and the Ancestry of the 
Chelonia. By D, M..S. Watson, MSc, E.Z:s., 
Lecturer on Vertebrate Paleontology in University 
College, London. (Plate VII., and Text-figure 1.)... 


Notes on some Carnivorous Therapsids. By D. M.5. 
Watson, M.Sc., F.Z.8., Lecturer on Vertebrate Pale 
ontology in University College, London. (Text- 
SCOTT) 11a) ae a ee NSO ree tree RA a Nc 


Contributions to the Anatomy and Systematic Arrange- 
ment of the Cestoidea—XV. On a new Genus and 
Species of the Family Acoleide. By Frank E. 
Brpparp, M.A., D.Sc., F.R.S., F.Z.S., Prosector to 
mmepsocte iyi, (hext- Mo umesil Oe oe css s sac sje oon ses 


Page 


955 


995 


1011 


Dae 


ie Oe F ‘ ‘en 
j i _ ne Bs 
: sh hae in brisie: a, 


oh 


iA BECCA. Gist 
OF THE 
CONTRIBUTORS, 


With References to the several Articles contributed by each. 


(1914, pp. 491-1077.) 


Page 
Auten, HE. Heron-. See Heron- Aen, E. 
Awatt, P. R., B.A. (Cantab.), D.I.C. (Lond.). 
The Mechanism of Suction in the Potato Capsid Bag, 
Lygus pabulinus Linn. (Text-figures 1-29.)............... 685 
Bepparp, Frank E., M.A., D.Sc., F.R.S., F.Z.8., Prosector 
to the Society. 
Contributions to the Anatomy and Systematic Arrange- 
ment of the Cestoidea :— 
XIV. On a new Species of Rhabdometra, and on the 
Paruterine Organ in Otaditenia. (Text-figures 1-11.) ... 859 
XV. On a new Genus and Species of the Family 
meorerdeewe (Nexb-tommes 192) Oeil ecccsecseesseckces: 1039 


BovuLencer, Georce A., LL.D., F.R.S., F.Z.S. 


On a second Collection of Batrachians and Reptiles 
made by Dr. H. G. F. Spurrell, F.Z.S., in the Choco, 
Colermiiraien (eleiiesile MP eee ee s.r hs eles cac endo ee 813 


x 


Page 
Broom, Rosert, M.D., C.M.Z.S8. 

Exhibition of Mammalian Skulls showing Dental 
ICE Le RIUTOVa iBone “unre Nar nnena ne acbint see bene ane adie eM ares ous 1071 

Exhibition of the Skull of a new type of Thecodont 
Reptile (Youngina capensis) from the Upper Permian 
Beds of South Africa. (Text-figures 1 & 2.) ............... 1072 

Burne, Ricwarp H., M.A., V.P.Z.S. 

Exhibition of some adaptations for the nourishment 
of the embryos of Elasmobranchs ..............0...0:000000: 1059 

Exhibition of Simulacra of Molluscan and other 
PED S mere Meet sedi scab adae clive anaes eho te Ae eae 1061 

Carter, J. THorNToN, F.Z.S. 

Exhibition of Microphotographs of Mitosis in the 
Cells of the Enamel Organ in Dasyurus viverrinus and 
Driehoeumus wulpoowla 234i ae Oe, ee 943 

Cunnineton, Witiiam A., M.A., Ph.D., F.Z.S. 

Zoological Results of the Third Tanganyika Expedi- 
tion, conducted by Dr. W. A. Cunnington, 1904-1905,.— 
Report on the Parasitic Eucopepoda. (Plate I., and 
‘bes Feino (Uae 1) AN ee em aren De ML oo el 819 

Distant, WiLuiAM L. 

Notice of Report on the Rhynchota collected by the 

Wollaston Expedition in Dutch New Guinea............... 1060 


Earuannd, ArtuuR, See Heron-Auven, E. 


x1 


Heron-Atien, Epwarp, F.L.S., F.Z.8., and Haranp, 
Artruur, F.R.M.S. 


Notice of Memoir on the Foraminifera of the Kerimba 
Archipelago obtained by Dr. J. J. Simpson in the 
years 1907-8 


See eee CC CC tC a 


Exhibition and Discussion on ‘‘ Purpose” and “ In- 
telligence”” shown by the Arenaceous Foraminifera in 
the construction of their tests 


HocewriNnY i, MAL HZS. 


Notice of Report on the Spiders collected by the 
British Ornithologists’ Union and Wollaston Expeditions 
in Dutch New Guinea 


Houxtey, Juxian §., B.A. 


The Courtship-habits of the Great Crested Grebe 
(Podiceps cristatus) ; with an addition to the Theory of 
SexualySelections, (Plates Wd UN) n 00. \.ccbcseme sence = 


IREDALE, Tom. 


Report on Mollusca collected at the Monte Bello 
Islands. (Text-figure 1.) ..........:.cceeeeteee eects enene tens 


JAMES, Lewis H., B.A., F.Z.8. 


Notes upon the birth of a Porpoise at the Brighton 
JA ORURN GTO | 152 Alo kenan du asbag coe) pcoche AA HBHROeO nun oh age Searing 


Leurs, Dr. Pu. 


Description of a new Lizard from the Canary 
TISTIIGIS | GlectkeoenSehon doc npeorsdete och au. cc no co pALHCp ADSM oan pno 


Page 


1060 


1069 


1061 


491 


665 


1061 


X11 


MircuHecy, P. Caatmers, M.A., D.Sc., LL.D., F.R.S., F.Z.8., 


Secretary to the Society. 


Report on the Additions to the Society’s Menagerie 
dumne themonbh of Mays OA yee) ee ceehn.care seer nere 


Report on the Additions to the Society’s Menagerie 
during the months of June, July, August, and September, 
SU et nee se Je cto etal Oke eh UR mI is 2 ot cig aiallt miele 


Report on the Additions to the Society's Menagerie 
gurine thewmonth ot October l Qa eee he ceacecse scree 
Exhibition of a photograph showing Oysters growing 
upon mangroves at Lobito Bay, Portuguese West 


JANA GUAGE Wp oasee aa eters. 16 Se Tee eh hs te SA a a 
MownracuE, P. D., B.A. 
A Report on the Fauna of the Monte Bello Islands. 
(ERG eS BU IEV i. iy ieccne meeri. ation (tre ise Ue cue par ea 
Newron, Epwin T., F.R.S.,. F.Z.S. 


Exhibition of bones of animals showing indications of 


natural repair, and some teeth of a female Physeter ...... 


Perkins, Ropert C. L., M.A., D.Sc., F.Z.8. 


On the Species of Alastor (Paralastor) Sauss., and 


some other Hymenoptera of the Family Eumenide. 


(ESE ie Rk) RIE AP a eee eee oct g Da IRD Ze URN ity Ine Wc 


Pocock, Reerarp I; F.R.S., F.LS., F.Z.8., Curator of 


Mammals. 


On the Facial Vibrissee of Mammalia. (Text-figures 
1-13.) 


On the Feet and other External Features of the 
Canidee and Urside. (Text-figures L=13:) 


Exhibition, on behalf of Major C. P. Bradshaw, of a 


white specimen of Sémmering’s Gazelle 


Exhibition showing some new points of difference 
between the Pine Marten (Martes martes) and the Beech 
Marten (Martes foina). (Text-figures 1-4.) 


Page 


1069 


563 


889 


913 


944 


xi 
Ronis Ac. VE AG 


Polycheta from the N.E. Pacific: the Chetopteride. 
With an Account of the Phenomenon of Asexual 
Reproduction in Phyllochetopterus and the Description 
of Two new Species of Cheetopteride from the Atlantic. 
(Blabes We Vile ame Pext- tomes 30) a sess aa. vee: 


Preston, Hucu B., F.Z:S. 


Diagnoses of New Genera and Species of Zonitidee 


omemauatoartale Amica. (Plates ill) oo se scecc0..5- 


Rarupun, Miss Mary J. 


Stalk-eyed Crustaceans collected at the Monte Bello 
sland seuaG@ilaites: Uc ds MAC) Sie. .erteasvieeeencl se eladed. cece 


Rosson, G. C., B.A. 


Cephalopoda from the Monte Bello Islands. (Text- 
i@inine dl py Seeea dee nhe een riant Ome se eRe Ebene Seat onto anaes 


Savace, R. E. 


Exhibition of two abnormal Herrings, taken by trawl 
in the North Sea 


Seem em eee men enter ewe wees eee e reese eee e ee ee eee sere 


Sura-Smrra, Davin, F.Z.8., Curator of Birds. 


Exhibition of an Egg of the New Guinea Rifle-bird 
(Piilorhis intercedens) laid in the Society’s Gardens ...... 


Srepernc, The Rev. THomas R. R., M.A., F.B.S., F.LS., 
E.ZS. 


Serene ree 


Huweallentinia, nom, n. for Vallentinia Stebbing 


955 


787 


653 


677 


1060 


X1V 


WATERS, ARTHUR W., PLS. BGS. 


The Marine Fauna of British East Africa and 
Zanzibar, from Collections made by Cyril Crossland, 
M.A., B.Sc., F.Z.S., in the Years 1901-1902. Bryozoa— 
Cyclostomata, Ctenostomata, and Endoprocta. (Plates 
SII chats Neprareimeiiaey NS) Best ecooneccdeasspocedneeapoacacca: 


Watson, Davin M. §., M.Sc., F.Z.S. 


Procolophon trigoniceps, a Cotylosaurian Reptile from 
South Africa. (Plates I—ITI., and Text-figures 1-5.) ... 


The Deinocephalia, an Order of Mammal-like Reptiles. 
(eibneay HW, Wop eumal Wescoctnlegnaaess WIS) oascaonoceoseavsedion 


Broomia perplera, gen. et sp. n., a Fossil Reptile from 
South Africa. (Plate VI., and Text-figures 1-5.) 


Eunotosaurus africanus Seeley, and the Ancestry of 
the Chelonia. (Plate VII., and Text-figure 1.) 


Notes on some Carnivorous Therapsids. (Text- 
figures 1-7.) 


Wrruers, Tuomas H., F.G.S. 


A remarkable new Cirripede from the Chalk of Surrey 
and Hertfordshire. (Plate I, and Text-figure 1.) 


831 


INDEX. 
1914.—Pages 491-1077. 


[New names in clarendon type. 


Systematic references in italics. 


(z.8.1.) indicates additions to the Society’s Menagerie. | 


Abispa meade-waldoensis, sp. n., | 


623. 

Ablepharus muelleri: ethology, 641. 

Acanthopleura, 669. 

gemmata, 666, 668. 

spinosa, 666, 668. 

Acmea saccharina, var., 666, 670. 

Acridium maculicollis, 648. 

Actea affinis, 688. 

—— glandifera, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 5), 
658. 

Acte@odes affinis, 658. 

Actumnus setifer, 660. 

Adelosaurus, gen. n., 1009. 

huxleyi: structure (Fig. 5), 1008. 

JEpyprymnus rufescens: facial 
brissz (Fig. 3), 893. 

Africarion concavospira, sp. n. 
(Pl. II. fig. 20), 787. 

—— copiosa, sp. n. (Pl. Il. fig. 18), 
788. 

—— kagambahensis, sp. n. (PI. II. 
fig. 18), 789. 

—— kiduhaensis, sp. n. (Pl. I. 
fig. 16), 788. 

marsabitensis, sp. n. (Pl. IT. 

fig. 14), 788. 

orestias, sp. n. (Pl. II. fig. 15), 

788. 


Vi- 


—— oscitans, sp. n. (Pl, II. fig. 4), 


788. 
—— spatiosa, sp. n. (Pl. II. fig. 17), 
789. 


Africarion tenebrosa, sp. n. (PI. IL 
fig. 19), 789. 

Alastor, 563. 

Alectrion suturalis, 667. 

Alopex lagopus: feet: rhinarium: 
facial vibrissee (Fig. 7), 923. 

Alpheus bucephalus, 654: 

—— edwardsti, 6)4. 

Amalda elongata, 667. 

Amathia dichotoma, 848. 

distans, 848. ' 

-—— lendigera (Pl. IV. figs. 3, 4), 847, 
848. 

semiconvoluta, 847. 

vidovici (Pl. IV. figs. 1, 2), 848. 

Ammotragus lervia: facial vibrisse, — 
911. 

Amsacta marginata, 645. 

Amyna. octo, 647. 

spilonota, 647. 

Anastomus oscitans (Z. s. L.), 943, 

Anatomy. See Srrucrure. 

Anchistus inermis, 656. 

Ancilla elongata, 667. 

Anoa depressicornis (z. 8. u.), 1057. 

Anolis palmeri, 814. 

Anthela pudica, 646. 

Anthus australis montebelli, 635. 

Antigona tiara, 666, 668. 

Antilope cervicapra: facial vibrisse, 
911. 

Anumeta zuboides, sp. nu. (Pl. I. 
fis, 12), O47, 


xV1 


Aporus sp., 649. 

cingulatus, 649. 

ARACHNIDA : 
Aranee from Dutch New Guinea 

(see ‘ Transactions ’). 

Aramus giganteus (z. 8s. L.), 1058. 

Arca fusca, 666. 

Archimantis brunneriana, 648. 

Arctocephalus pusillus: facial vibrissee, 
901. 

Arctognathus 
1028. 

Arctops willistoni, gen. et sp. u.: 
structure (Figs. 3, 4), 1027. 

Arcularia suturalis, 657. 

Artamus leucorhynchus harterti, 654. 

Asanadopsis mgobergi, 65). 


curvimola: structure, 


Ascopodaria gracilis, 85. 
Atelopus spurrelli, sp. n. (Pl. I. 
fig. 1), 815. 
Atergatis floridus, 657. 
ocyroé, 657. 
Atherura africana: 
(Pig. 9), 903. 
Atractaspis irregularis (z. s.u.), 1059. 
Aves: 
from Monte Bello Islands: syste- 
matic: ethology, 632; Podiceps 
cristatus: courtship habits, 491 ; 
Ptilorhis 
1070. 
Axis axis: facial vibrisse (Fig. 12), 
909. 


facial yvibrissze 


intercedens: ethology, 


Barentsia gracilis, 855, 
Barracnuta : 
from Choco, Colombia: systematic, 
813. 
Bauria  cynops: 
(Fig. 1), 1021, 
Beania intermedia, 856. 
Belenois java, 644. 
—— teutonica, 644. 
cayennensis 


structure 


(skull) 


Belonopterus 
1050. 

Bembex (?) variabilis, 649. 

Blayneyella, gen. n., 799. 

—— kisengiensis, 
fiz, 21), 799. 


(z. S. L.), 


(Qt I 


sp. n. 


INDEX. 


Blayneyella microspiralis, sp. n. 
(Pl. I. fig. 18), 800. 

percivali, sp. n. (PI. I. fiz. 19), 

799. 

purpureocincta, sp.n. (Pl. I. 
fig. 20), 79). 

Boa imperator, 815. 

Bos frontalis: facial vibrissee, 911. 

Boselaphus tragocamelus: facial vi- 
brissee, 911. 

Bostrychopsis jesuitus, 647. 

Bowerhankia pustulosa, 851. 

Bradypus tridactylus: facial vibrissze, 
893. 

Broomia perplexa, gen. et sp. n.: 
structure (Pl. V. figs. 1-4), 995. 

Lruchigavia longirostris, 637. 

nove-hollandie longirostris, 637. 

Bryozoa. See Ponyzoa. 

Bufo coniferus, 813. 

Bu'laria columellaris, 667. 

Burungaélla, gen. n., 797. 

buhambaénsis, sp. n. (Pl. J. 


fig. 16), 798. 

imperforata, sp. n. (Pl. I. 
fig. 15), 798. 

mutandana, sp. n. (Pl. I. 


fic. 14), 798. 

oscitans, sp. n. (Pl. I. fig. 17), 
Tote 

Buskia nitens, 854. 


Callithrix jacchus: facial vibrisse, 898. 

Camelus bactrianus: facial Vibrissxe, | 
SU 

dromedarius: facial vibrissee, $11. 

Cancer dama, 662. 

Canis anthus: feet (Fig. 4), 918. 

mesomelas: feet: rhinarium : 

facial vibrissee (Fig. 7), 901 ; (Fig. 4) 

920. 

pallipes: feet (Fig. 1), 915. 

— sclateri: feet: rhinarium : facial 
vibrissx (Fig. 5), 920, 

Cardita incrassata, 666. 

Cardium dupuchense, 666. 

——— unedo, 666, 667. 

Curpilodes ruber, 657. 

Castor canadensis (z. 8. 1.), 1058, 


INDEX. 


Cavia rufescens: facial  vibrisse 
(Fig 10), 903. 

Centetes ecaudatus : 
(Fig. 4), 898. 

Cephalophus coronatus: facial vibriss 
(Fig. 13), 911. 

Cephalopyrus flammiceps 
1057. 

Cercopithecus: facial vibrisse, 898. 

Cerdocyon microtis: feet: rhinarium : 
facial vibrissee (Fig. 5), 920. 

Cerithium fasciatum, 606. 

Certhiola flaveola (z.s.u.), 1058. 

Cervus elaphus: facial vibrisse, 910. 

eldi: facial vibrisse, 909; (z.s.L.), 
1057. 

Chetopteride: structure: development 
(Pls. I-VI. figs. 1-13; Figs. 1-13), 
955. 

Chetopterus variopedatus: structure: 
development (Figs. 1, 2), 961, 978. 

Charadrius geoffroyt, 637. 

— mongolus, 637. : 

ruficapillus tormenti, 637. 

Chelonia: structure, 1011. 

Chelydra rossignont, 814. 

Chinchilla lanigera: facial vibrisse, 
903. 

Chiton cunninghamt, 669. 

Chiamys lentiginosus, var., 666. 

radula, 666. 

—— squamosus, var., 666. 

Chloridea arnugera, 646. 

Cheroichthys valenciennet, 650, 

Cheropotamus : facial vibrisse, 908. 

Chrysochloris asiatica: dental varia- 
tion, 1071. 

— hottentota : 
LOGE 

Chrysococcyx basalis wyndhami, 633. 

Cicinnurus regius (z. 8. u.), 1059. 

Cinnyris chalybeus (z. s. u.), 1058. 

Cirphis abdominalis, 647. 

Cissa chinensis (z. s. u.), 1060. 

Clupea harengus: abnormal, 1060. 

Coccinella transversalis, 647. 

Celogenys paca: facial vibrisse, 903. 

Coendu bicolor (z. s. u.), 1057. 

prehensilis: facial vibrisse, 903. 


facial vibrissa 


(Z. 8. U.), 


dental variation, 


iF 


XVll 


Collusa sp. ?, 646. 

Coluber arizone (z. s. u.), 1057. 

——- corais, 815. 

Connochxtes albojubatus (z, s. L.), 
1059, 

Conurus canicularis (z. s. L.), 948. 

Conus anemone, 667, 675. 

maculosus, 6795. 

Cormocephalus turneri, 650. 

Coryphistes cyanopterus, 648. 

Coua ruficeps (2. 8. u.), 1057. 

Crangon bucephalus, var., 654. 

edwardsii, 654. 

Cricetomys gambianus: facial vibrissee, 
902. 


Crisia circinata, sp. n. (Pl. I. 
fics. 7-9), 840. 

—— denticulata (Pl. IV. fig. 5), 
837. 


elongata (Pls. I. figs. 3, 4; IV. 
fig. 6), 838. 
inflata, sp. n. (Pl. I. figs. 1, 2), 
839. 
recurva, 839. 
sertularoides (Pl. I. figs. 5, 6), 
839. 
Crotaphytus collaris (z.s. u.), 1058. 
CRUSTACEA : 
from Monte Bello Islands: syste- 
matic: ethology, 653. 
Parasitic Kucopepoda: Tanganyika : 
River Nile: systematic, 819. 


Cirripedia: systematic: structure, 
945, 
Ctenostomata, 831. 
Cuon primevus: feet: rhinarium : 


facial vibrissx (Fig. 2), 916. 
Cyclostomata, 831. 
Cylindrecium giganteum, 854. 
Cymatium aquatile, 666. 
Cyprea caputserpentis, 667. 
caurica, 667. 

—— cylindrica, 667. 

——- erosa, 667. 

errones, 667. 

moneta, 567. 

Cyrtacanthus guttulosa, 648. 

Cystophora cristata: facial 
Gis. 7); 901; (@ s.u.), 943. 


vibrisse 


XVIl1 


CytTroLoGy: 


Manmarta: Dasyurus: Trichosurus: | 


enamel-cells, 9-43. 


Dama dama: facial vibrisse, 910. 
Damaliscus albifrons (z. s. u.), 1057. 
Danais chrysippus f. petilia, 644. 
Dardanus megistos, 656. 


Dasyprocta columbiana: facial vibrisse, 


903. 
Dasyurus viverrinus: facial vibrisse, 
891; cytology, 943. 

Daubentonia (Chiromys) madagascari- 
ensis: facial vibrissee (Fig. 6), 898. 
Deinocephalia: structure (Pls. 1V., V.; 

Figs. 1-18), 749. 
Demiegretta sacra: ethology, 638. 
Dendrohyrax dorsalis: facial vibrisse, 


906. 


Dendrolagus ursinus; facial vibrissee | 
o 


(Fig. 3), 895. 
Dermestes cadavorinus, 647. 
Deuterosaurus, 774. 
DEVELOPMENT: 


Mammatia: Cetacea: Phoczna cow- 


munis, 1061. 
Verminra: Phyllochetopterus, 972. 


Diademodon: structure (Figs. 3, 4), | 


1028. 
Didelpbys azar: 
(Fig. 1), 891. 
Dimetrodon: structure (Fig. 4), 1026. 
Diphyllodes hunsteini (z. s. u.), 1060. 
Dolichotis salinicola : 
903. 
Drymobius boddaertii, 815. 


facial 


Echidna hystrix: facial vibrisse, 891. 

Ectopatria aspera, 646. 

Egernia striolata (z. s. u.), 1058. 

Elaps spurrelli, sp. n. 
fig. 3), 817. 

Elgonella, gen. n., 795. 


—— angustior, sp. n. (Pl. IT. fig. 6), | 


797. 


brunnea, sp n. (PI. II. fig. 11), | 


796. 


—— discolorata, sp.n, (Pl. IL. fig.7), 


796. 


vibrissxe | 


facial yvibrisse, | 


(CEL elale | 


INDEX. 


Elgenella euloteformis, sp. n. 
(BIS ties9);) 796: 

——- flavidula, sp. n. (Pl. Il. fig") 
796. 

oribates, sp. n. (PI. II. fig. 8), 

197. 

robini, sp. n. (P1. Il. fig. 10), 

797. 

sobrina, sp. n. (PI. Il. fig. 12); 
797. 

Allipsidron inguinata, 648. 

Endoprocta, 831. 

Entalophora deflexa, 840. 
——— wasinensis, nom. un. 
figs. 1-4, 9: Fig. 1), 840. 

Eosuchia, subord. nov., 1077.. 
Epactrothynnus productus, 649. 
Ephbthianura albifrons (z. s. u.), 105°. 
——— tricolor distincta, 634. 
Hphutomorpha modesta, 649. 

morosa, 649. 


(eal Iu 


| Kpicrates cenchris, 815. 


Epimys norvegicus: facial vibrisse 
(Fig. 8), 901. 

Eptesicus pumilus : ethology, 631. 

Equide: facial vibrissx, 906. 


| KHremiornis carteri assimilis, 634. 


Erethizon dorsatum: facial yibrissz 

(Fig. 10), 903. 

Hrinaceus europexus: facial vibrissee 

(Big. 4), 895. 

ErnouoGcy: 

Aves: Podiceps cristatus: court- 
ship-habits, 491; Ptilorhis inter- 
cedens, 1070. 

Insecta: Paralastor, 563. 

Mouuusca: Ostrea, 1061, 

VermipEa: Mesocheetopterus, 938 3 
Phyllocheetopterus, 980. 

Prorozoa: Foraminifera, 1069, 

Eublemma dubia, 647. 

Huchelus atratus, 666. j 

Eulima montagueana, sp. n. 
(Fig. 1), 672. 


EHunotosaurus africanus : structure 
(Pl. VII.; Fig. 1), 1015. 
Euphractus villosus: facial yibrissz 


(Fig. 4), 898. 
Hupoda geoffroyi, 637. 


INDEX. 


Eupoda mongolus, 637. 

Euproctis chionitis, 646. 

Eutamias quadrivittatus : 
brissx, 903. 

Euvallentinia, nom. n. for Vadlen- 
dinia, 944. 

Euxoa radians, C46. 


facial vi- 


Falloonella, gen. n., 809. 

—— exquisita, sp. n. (Pl.I. fig. 9), 
809. 

—— —— gudei, subsp. n. (PI. I, 
fig. 10), 809. 

larogiensis, sp.n. (PI. I. fig. 11), 
809. 

Farrella atlantica (P\. LV. fig. 9), 852. 

gigantea, 854. 

Filisparsa irregularis, 844. 

— tubulosa, 842. 

Foraminifera: ethology, 1069: 
Kerimba Archipelago (see ‘ Trans- 
actions’). 

Fragum unedo, 667. 


from 


Galago crassicaudata: facial vibrissze 

(Fig. 6), 898. 

Gampsonyx swainsoni (z. 8. L.), 1058. 
Gazella semmeringi: variation, 944. 
Gehyra variegata : ethology, 640. 
Gelasimus forcipatus, 661. 
GEOGRAPHICAL: 

Fauna of Monte Bello Islands, 625, 
653, 665, 677. 

ReprtuiA: Colombia: systematic, 
813; South Africa (fossil), 739, 
749, 995, 1021; Lacerta: Canary 
Islands, 681. 

Barracura : Colombia: systematic, 
813. 

Insecta: Hymeuoptera : Paralastor : 
Australia, 563; Rhynchota: Dutch 
New Guinea (see ‘ Transactions’). 

Anracuyipa: Aranese: Dutch New 
Guinea (see ‘ Transactions *). 

Crustacna: Parasitic Eucopepoda: 
Tanganyika (River Nile), 819; 


Cirripedes from Chalk of Surrey | 
and Herts, 945. | 


ie 
GuoGRAPHICGAL (con.): 
Moutuvusca: Zonitide : Equatorial 
Africa, 787. 
Ponyzoa: B.E. Africa: Zanzibar 
831. 
VermipEA: Chetopteride ; N.E, 


Pacific: Atlantic: British Waters 
95d. 
Protozoa: Foraminifera ; Kerimba 
Archipelago (see ‘ Transactions’). 
Geopelia humeralis headlandi, 632. 
Geranoaétus imelanoleucus (z. s. L.), 
1060. 3 
Giraffa camelopardalis (z. s. u.), 1059. 
Glis glis: facial vibrissxe (Fig. 8), 902. 
Glyptoxanthus cymbifer, sp. n. 
(Pls. I., IL., figs. 6,7), 658. 
Gobius phalena, 650. 
Gonitis subulifera, 646. 
Gonocephalum meyricki, 647. 
Gonodactylus chiragra, 
664. 
Gorgonops: structure (Fig. 6), 1031, 
1034. 
Graninodes oceliata, 646. 
Gudeeélla aranea, sp. n. (Pl. III. 
fig. 20), 789. 


var. smithit, 


bartaensis, sp. n. (Pl. III. 
fig. 6), 790. 
consobrina, sp. n. (Pl. IIL. 


fig. 9), 794. 

consueta, sp. n. (PI. III. fig. 18), 
790. 

—— densesculpta, sp. n. (Pl. III. 
fig. 14), 791. 

—— elgonensis, 
fig. 19), 791. 

—— gerstenbrandti, sp. n. (Pi. IIT. 
fig. 7), 792. 

—— inclinans, sp. nu. (Pl. II1. figs. 1, 
8), 792. 


GO, ws Ce, MOE 


inflata, sp. n. (Pl, III. fig. 21), 
792. 

iridescens, sp. n. (Pl. III. 
fig. 15), 793. 

kampalaensis, sp. n. (Pl. III, 
fig. 10), 790. 

marsabitensis, sp. u. (PI. III. 


fig. 22), 798. 


xX 


Gudeélla masakaénsis, 

(PL IIL. fig. 16), 798. 

— mime, sp, n. (Pl. III. fig. 23). 791- 
mukandaensis, sp. n. (Pl. Il. 
fig. 11), 794. 

——, mutandana, 
(Pl. III. fig. 12), 794. | 
multistriata, sp. n. (Pl. III. 
fig. 3), 794. 
nemorum, 
fig, 24), 794. 
pallidior, sp, u. (Pl. III. fig. 5), 
795. 
tribulationis, sp. n. (Pl. III, 
fic, 4), 795. 
urguessensis, sp. n. (Pl. III. 
fig. 17), 790. 
usitata, sp. n. (Pl. III. fig. 2): 
791. 
woodhousei, sp. n. (Pl. III. 
fiz. 13), 792. 


Spey, tl. 


var. n. 


(Pl. IIT. | 


sp. n. 


Hematopus longirostris, 637. 
unicolor ophthalmicus, 637. 
Haleyon sanctus westralasianus, 633. 
sordidus melvillensis, 633. 
—— westralasianus, 633. 
Haliatius leucogaster : 
TIL), 638. 
Haliastur girrenera: ethology, 6389. 
facial vibrissz, | 


ethology (Pl. | 


Halicherus grypus: 
901. 

Haliotis squamata, 666. 

varia, 666. 

Halobates, 649. 

Helarctos malayanus: feet: rhinarium 
(Fig. 15), 936, 937. 

Henicospilus sp., 649. 

Hermatobatodes sp., 649. 

Heteronota binoet (PI. L. figs. 
ethology, 640, 641. 

Hinula australis, 642, 

tenuis, 642. 

Hippopotamus amphibius: facial  vi- 
brissze, 908. 

Hippuraria verticillata, 858. 

Holochila heathii aerata, subsp. 


1-3) : 


n., 640, 


INDEX. 


Homalocranium nigrum, sp. n. 
(Pl. II. fig. 2), 816. 

Hoplodactylus pacificus (z. s. u.), 1059. 

Hornera violacea, var. tubulosa, 842. 

Fuenia proteus, 661. 

Hyastenus oryx, 661. 

Hydrocherus hydrocherus: facial vi- 
brissee (Fig. 9), 904. 

Hydroprogne tschegrava strenua, 636. 

Hylodes ramiformis, 813. 

Hyrtacus eutrachelia, 648. 

Hystrix: facial vibrisse, 903. 


Idmonea interjuncta (Pl. II. fig. 5), 
846. 

—- wregularis, 843. 

milneana, 844. 

-— pedleyi, 846. 

pulcherrima, 846. 

—— radians (Pl. II. figs. 6-8), 844. 

—— —, var. erecta (Pl. II. fig. 10), 
844, 

Iguana tuberculata, 815. 

Insecta: 


Monte Bello Islands, systematic: 
ethology, 643. 

Hymenoptera: Paralastor: syste- 
matic, ethology, 563. 

Rhynchota: structure (suction - 
mechanism), 685; from Dutch 


New Guinea (see ‘Transactions ’). 
Irena turcosa (z, 8. t.), 1059. 
Isodon novitius, 647. 


Lsoodon barrowensis, 631. 


Jaculus jaculus?: facial vibrissee, 903. 
orientalis ; facial vibrisszx, 902. 


Lacerta czesaris, sp. n., 681. 

Lachesis schlegelii, 817. 

Lagenipora socialis, 856. 

Lagorchestes conspicillatus : ethology, 
630. 

Lagostomus trichodactylus: facial yi- 
brissze, 905. 

Lagothrix lagotrichia: facial vibrisse, 
898. 


INDEX. 


Lalage tricolor (z. 8. u.), 1058. 
Lama huanacos : facial vibrissee, 911. 


911; 


vicugna: facial vibrissie, 
(a. 8. u.), 1057. 

Lambrus (Rhinolambrus) 
663. 

Lamiasaurus newtoni, gen. et 
sp. n., structure (Figs. 8, 9), 750, 
768. 

Larogiella, gen. n., 800. 

—— angulifera, sp. n. (PI. II. fig. 1), 
800. 

—- fonticula, sp. n. (Pl. II. fig. 3), 
801. 

kombaensis, sp. n. (PI. IT. 

fig. 2), 801. 

malasanjiensis, sp. n. (Pl. I. 

fig. 25), 801. 

venatoris, sp. n. (Pl. I. fig. £2) 
800. 

Ledoulxia adjacens, sp. n. (Pi. I- 
fic. 8), 808. 

crassiplicata, sp. n. (Pl. I. 
fig. 1), 806. 

—— decussata, sp. n. (Pl. L. fiz. 7), 
806. 

—— elgonensis, sp. n. (Pl. L. fig. 4). 
807. 

—— eussoéngis, sp, n. (Pl. I. fig. 2), 
807. 

—— jingaénsis, sp. n. (PI. L. fie. 6), 
807. 

—-— levistriata nyeriensis, var. 
n. (Pl. I. fig. 3), 808. 

—— marsabitensis, sp. n. (Pl. I. 
fic. 5), 808. 

Lemur eatta: facial vibrissze, 898. 

fulvus: facial vibrissse. £98. 

mongos: facial vibrissx, 898. 

—-yarius: facial vibrisse (Fig. 6), 
898. 

Leontocebus leoninus ; 
(Fig. 6), 898. 

Lepidoblepharis intermedius, 
Span (alate 2), Cit. 

Lepralia poissonti, 856. 

Leptophis brevior, sp. n. (PI. II. 
fig. 1), 815. 


pelagicus, 


facial vibrissse 


XX1 


Lerneocera, 820, 822. 

-—— diceracephala, sp. n. (Pl. I. 
figs. 1-3), S24, 

haplocephala, sp. n. (Pl. I. 

figs. 4-7), 826. 

temnocephala, sp. n. (Pl. I. 
fies. 8, 9), 827. 

Liasis childreni, 643. 

Lima fragilis, 666. 

lima, 666. 

multicostata, 666. 

Lophactea granulosa, 658. 


_ Lophognathus gilberti, 641. 


Loxosoma singulare, 855. 

Lycaon pictus: feet: rhinarium : facial 
vibrisse (Fig. 3), 917. 

Lychas variatus, 650. 

Lycosuchus: structure (Fig. 7), 1035. 

Lygosoma bipes, 641. 

-—— isolepis,: ethology, 642. 

lesueurti: ethology, 642. 

moco (Z. 8. u.), 1059. 

tenue (z. Ss. u.), 1059. 

Lygus pabulinus: structure (suction- 
mechanism) (Figs. 1-29), 685. 


Maerocorax fuscicapillus (z. s. u.), 1059. 

Maeropus bennetti : 
895. 

billardieri: fazial vibrissx, 893. 

Matleus malleus, 666. 

MAMMALIA : 

Facial vibrissze, 889. 

Monte Bello Islands: systematic: 
ethology, 630. 

Canidz and Ursidz: systematic : 
structure (feet: rhinaria: facial 
vibrissz), 915. 

Chrysochloris asiatica : C. hottentota : 
dental variation, 1071. 

Gazella scimmeringi: variation, 944. 

Martes martes: M. foina : structure, 
1062. 

Phascolaretus cimereus : dental yaria- 
tion, L071. 

Phocsena communis: 


1061, 


facial vibrissze, 


development, 


XXi1 


MawManra (com.) = 

Trichosurus vulpecula : dental varia- 
tion, 1071. 

Manis tricuspis: facial vibrisse (Fig. 4), 
895. 

Marmosa elegans: facial vibrisse, 891. 

Martes foina: structure (Figs. 2, 3), 
1062. 

— martes: structure (Figs. 1, 38), 
1062. 

Mazama tema?: facial vibrissee, 908. 

Megapodius duperreyi (4 s. L.). 1059. 

Meles meles: facial vibrissx, 901. 

Melicleptria albivenata, sp. n. 
(Pl. I. fig. 11), 646. 

neurias, O46. 

Melursus ursinus: feet: 
(Figs. 12, 15), 933, 937. 

Mesocheetopterus, gen. n., 957, 967. 

—— minuta, sp. n.: structure (Pls. 
IL., ITI. figs. 7, 8; Figs. 4, 5), 958, 963. 

taylori, sp. n.: ethology: struc- 


rhinarium 


ture (Pls, I., III. figs. 5-6, 9; Figs. | 


1, 5), 957, 958. 
Metapeneus monoceros, 653. 
stridulans, 693. 
Microgomphodon oligocynus, structure 
(skull) (Fig. 2), 1028. 
Microtus sandayensis (z. s. t.), 1058. 
Mictotragus arachne, 647. 
Mictyris longicarpus, 661. 
Mikenoélla, gen. n., 802. 
——ahena, sp. nu. (Pl. II. fig. 26), 
802. 
—— elevata, sp. n. (PI. II. fig. 
802. 
— neglecta, sp. n. (PI. II. fig. £ 
803. 
Mimosella bigeminata, 
(Pl. ILI. figs. 1-3), 851. 
Mirounga leonina: facial vibrissx, 901. 
Modiolus philippinarum, 666, 667. 
Mo .uuscea : 
Monte Bello Islands: systematic: 
geographical, 665, 667. 
Ostrea: ethology, 1061. 
Zonitidee: Central Africa: systematic, 
737. 
Monitor gouldii, 642, 


sje ie 


INDEX. 


Moncecocestus erethizontis, gen. 
et sp. n.: structure (Figs. 1-9), 1039. 

Mormosaurus seeleyi, gen. et sp. 
n.: structure (Pl. TV. Figs. 1-4), 750, 
767. 

Murena thyrsoidea, 650. : 

Mus musculus : facial yibrisse, 901. 

rattus: ethology, 631. 

avellanarius : 


Muscardinus facial vi- 
brissee, 902. 
Myosoma spinosa, 804. 
Myrrapopa : 
Monte Bello Islands: 


649. 


systematic, 


Nacaduba biocellata, 644. 

Nakuruella soror, gen. et sp. n. 
(Pl. I. fig. 13), 802. 

Nanotragus pygmeus: facial vibrissz, 
911. 

Nataiina permembranaea, 800. 

Natica vitellus, 666, 674. 

Nawxia serpulifera, 661. 

Naxioides serpulifera (P1. 11. figs. 9, 10), 
development, 661. 

Nectarinia famosa (z. t. s.), 1058. 

Neosleptria punctifera, 646. 

Neolucia serpentata, 644. 

Nerita albicilla, 666. 

Nettopus coromandelianus (z 1. s.), 943, 
1057. 

Nomia flaviviridis doddi, 649. 

Notophoyx flavivostris (z.s.u.), 1059. 

Nototragus melanotis: facial vibrissz, 
SILL. 

Nyctipithecus trivirgatus: facial 
brisse (Fig. 6), 898. 


vi- 


Octodon degus: facial vibrissze, 903.- 
Odatria ocellata, 642. 

Opsanus diemensis, 650. 

Orectolobus tentaculatus, 650. 
Oreocincla lunulata (z.s. u.), 1058. 
Ornithorhynchus: facial vibrisse, 891. 
Orthederides, sp., 648. 

Orycteropus capensis (2. s. L.), 1058. 


| Oryetolagus cuniculus: facial vibrissee, 


905, 


INDEX. 


Oryx gazelle (z.s t.), 1057. 

Osmotreron griseicauda (z.s.x.), 1059. 

* Ostreca cucullata, 656. 

Ostrea: ethology, 1061. 

Otaria californiana: 
901. 

Otiditenia eupodotidis: structure (Fig. 
11), 879. 

Otocyon megalotis: feet: rhinarium : 
facial vibrisse (Fig. 8), 927. 

Oxybelis acuminatus, 816. 

brevirostris, 816. 

Oxyrhopus petolarius, 816. 


facial vibrissx, 


Oxytoxia argenteo-ornatus, 645. 


Pachycephala rufiventris collett?, 638... 

Pagurus punctulatus, 656. 

Pandesma submurina, 646. - 

Pandion haliaétus melvillensis (Pl. 11.), 
ethology,.639. 

Paphia literata, 666. 

Paracolletes perfasciatus, 648. 

Paradisea apoda (z. 8. u.), 1059. 

—— minor (z.s..1.), 1059. 

Paralastor: ethology, 563. 

abnormis,. 622. 

albifrons, 566,584. 

albocinctus, 586. 

—— alexandrie, sp. n. (Pl. I. figs. 
7, 22), 578, 618. 

—— anostreptus, sp. n., 577, 613. 

apicatus, 569, 584. 

—— arenicolor, sp. n., 578, 618. 

argentifrons, 573, 593. 

-— argyrias, sp. n., 574. 597. 

atripennis, sp. u. (PI. I. fig. 13), 

574, 602. 

aureocinctus, 574, 602. 

australis, 566, 621. 

—— bicarinatus, sp. n., 574, 601. 

—— brisbanensis, sp. n., 575, 606. 

—— brunneus, 577, 612. 

—— carinatus, 576, 609. 

— clotho, 566, 579. 

—— cognatus, 569, 581. 

—— commutatus, sp. n., 575, 608. 

—— comptus, sp. n., 578, 617. 

—— ——— rubescens, var. n., 578, 
617. 


XXL 


_ Paralastor conspiciendus, sp. n., 


569, 581. 

—— co7spicrus, sp.n., 569, 580. 

—— constrictus, sp. n., 577, 615. 

cruentatus, 566, 622. 

—— darwinianus, sp. n., 577, 617. 

debilis, sp. n. (Pl. IL. fig. 20), 

573, 599. 

debilitatus, sp. n., 576, 611. 

dentiger, sp. n. (Pl. I. fig. 11), 

574, 603. 

despectus, sp. n., 572, 58). 

—— donatus, sp. n., 572, 588. 

—— dubiosus, sp. n., 569, 580. 

—— dyscritias, sp. n., 577, 614. 

—— elegans, sp. n., 569, 581. 

—— emarginatus, 571, 585. 

—— erturgus, 573, 592. 

— euclidias, sp, n., 574, 598. 

—— eugonias, sp. n., 574, 596. 

—— eustomus, sp.n., 575, 604. 

—— fallax, sp. n., 575, 606. 

—— flaviceps, 566, 569, 583. 

—— frater, sp. n., 571, 585. 

JSraternus, 568, 53). 

—- graeffei, 526, 622. 

— habilis, sp. n., 569, 583. 

—— hilaris, sp. n., (Pl. I. fig. 18), 574, 
600. . 

hirtensis, 567. 

hirtiventris, (2>. 

-_— icarioides, sp. n. (Pl. I. fig. 2), 
578, 620. 

—— ignotus, sp. n., 578, 621. 

——imitator, sp. n. (Pl. I. fig. 10), 
573, 578, 595. 

infernalis, 568, 579. 

—— infimus, sp. n., 575, 603. 

insularis. 570, 585. 

— lachesis, 566, 599. 

—— leetus, sp. n., 571, 585. 

— lateritius, 566, 576. 

——~ leptias, sp. n., 578, 620. 

—— mackayensis, sp. n., 575, 607. 

—— maculiventris, 574, 601. 

—— medius, sp. n., 575, 604. 

—  mesochlorus, sp. n., 577, 616. 

——  mesochloroides, st. n., 

577, 616, 


XX1V 


Paralastor microgonias, sj. n., 
574, 596. 

mimus, sp. n., 573, 578, 594. 

—— multicolor, sp. n. (Pl. I. figs. 9, 
19), 577, 612. 

—-— mutabilis, sp. n., (PJ. I. fig. 8), 

576, 610. 

nautarum, 566, 573, 600. 

—— occidentalis, sp n., 574, 598. 

—— odyneripennis, sp. n., 576, 610. 

—- odyneroides, sp. n., 576, 610. 

Be olorissspn|( Gisele dtigs.4, 10) 
575, 608. 

optabilis, sp. n., (Pl. I. fig. 12), 
574, 587. 

—— ordinarius, sp. n., 571, 586. 

orientalis, sp. n. (Pl. I. fig. 21), 
574, 599. 

—— pallidus, sp. n., 570, 584. 

parca (Pl. I. fig. 1), 571, 585. 

picteti, 577, 615. 

—— placens, sp. n., 573, 592. 

—— plebeius, sp. n., 576, 611. 

—— princeps, sp. n., 575, 607. 

pseudochromus, sp. n. (Pl. I. 

fic. 14), 575, 605. 

punctwlatus (Pl. I. fig. 17), 571, 

586. 

pusillus, 588. 

—~—— roseotinctus, sp. n., 972, 591, 

—— rufipes, sp. n., 568, 579. 

sanguineus, 597. 

—— saussurei, sp. n., 368, 579. 

similis, 586. 

— simillimus, sp. n., 578, 619. 

—— simplex, sp. n., 573, 594. 

—— simulator, sp. n., 572, 588. 

smithi, 567, 622. 

solitarius, sp. n. (Pl. I. fig. 6), 

574, 600. 

subhabilis, sp. n., 569, 583. 

—— subobscurus, sp. n., 575, 593. 

—— suboloris, sp. n., 575, 608. 

——subplebeius, sp. n. (Pl. I. 
fig. 15), 576, 611. 

—— summus, sp. n., 975, 604. 

—— synchromus, sp. n., 578, 619. 

— tasmaniensis, 569, 582. 


INDEX. 


Paralastor tricarinulatus, sp. n., 
569,582. 

tricolor, sp. nu. (Pl. I. fig. 5), 
572, 590. 

—— tuberculatus (PJ. I. fig. 3), 576, 
585. 

unifasciatus, 569, 581. 

—— viduus, sp. n., 576, 609. 

—— vulueratus, 575, 605. 

—— vulpinis, 572, 587. 

—— -—. excisus, st. n., 572, 587. 

xanthochromus, sp. n., 077, 

614. 

xerophilus, sp. n., 572, 591. 

Parthenope (Rhinolambrus) pelagica, 
665. 

Pedicellina gracilis, 855. 

spinosa (Pl. IV. figs. 10, 11), 
854. 

Pelecanus conspicillatus, 638. 

Percivalia mnyiroénsis, gen. et. 
sp. n. (Pl. I. fig. 12), 806. 

Periclimenes hermitensis, sp. n. 
(Pl. I. figs. 1-3), 655. 

Peripia variegata, 640. 

Periplaneta concolor, 648. 

Perodicticus potto: 
898. 

Petreeca leggei (z. s.u.), 1058. 

pheenicea (z.s. u.), 1058. 

Petrogale penicillata: facial vibrissie, 
893. 

Petrophila 
1058. 

Phalaropus hyperboreus (z.s. u.), 1061. 

Phaneropis muelleri, 641. 


facial vibrisse, 


cinclorbyncha (4. 8. L.), 


Phascolarctus cinereus: dental varia- 
tion, 1U71. 

Philander 
891. 

Phoca vitulina: facial vibrissx, 901. 


Janiger; facial vibrisse, 


Phocena communis: development, 
1061. 
Phocosaurus megischion: structure 


(Figs 11, 18), 762. 
Phorocanthia (?) senio, 647. 
Phrygilus gayi (z. s. u.), 1060. 
Phrynonax pecitonotus, 815, 


INDEX. 


Phyllochetopterus, 990. 
——anglica, sp. n.: structure (Pl. 

VIL, Figs. 9, 10, 12), 984. 

— dioti: structure (Fig. 13), 986. 
pictus: development: structure 
(Fig. 13), 986. 

prolifica, sp. n.: structure: de- 

velopment: ethology (Pls. IV., V- 

Fig. 11), 972, 980. 

Phymodius ungulatus, 659. 
Physignathus gilberti (Pl. I. figs. 4-7): 

ethology, 641. 

Pilumnus cerulescens, var., 660. 
vespertilio, 660. 
Pionus maximiliana (z. s. L.), 948, 

1057. 

Pisa serpulifera, 661. 
Piscss: 

Monte Bello Islands: systematic, 
650. 

Clupea harengus : abnormal, 1060. 

Pisobia minuta ruficollis, 638. 

Pitta nove-guines (z.s.L.), 1059. 
Platypodia granulosa, 658. 

Plotosus angwillaris, 650. 

Pnigalion oweni, gen. et sp. n.: 
structure (Figs. 5-7, 12, 16), 750, 

767. 

Podiceps cristatus : 
(Ply Its, JE), aie 
Polychrus spurrelli, sp. n., (PI. I. 

fig. 3), 814. 

Polydesma lawsont, 647. 
marmarinopa, 647. 
Pelypus sp., 680. 
Pouyzoa : 

Cyclostomata, Ctenostomata, Endo- 
procta: B. EK. Africa : systematic : 
structure, 831. 

Polyzosteria sp., 648. 

Potamogale velox : facial vibrissx, 895. 
Precis vellida, 644. 

Proboscidea : facial vibriss, 906. 
Proboscina sertularoides, 839. 

Procavia capensis : 
(Fig. 11), 906. 
Procolophon trigoniceps: structure (Pls. 

I-III. ; Figs. 1-5), 735. 

Propatria mundoides, 646. 


courtship-habits 


facial vibrissz 


XXV 


Protosquilla trispinosa (P). IT. figs. 11, 
12), 663. 
Protozoa : 
Foraminifera from Kerimba Archi- 
pelago (see ‘ Transactions’). 

: ethology, 1069. 
Proverruca vinculum, gen. et 
sp. n. (Pl. I. figs. 1-9: Fig. 1), 946. 
Pseudalopex gracilis?: feet: rhina- 
rium: facial vibrisse (Fig. 6), 

922: 
Pseudochirus peregrinus: facial vi- 
brissee, 893. 
Pseudochromis fuscus, 650, 
Pseudozethus, gen. n., 622. 
australensis, sp. n., 623. 
Pteromys sp.: facial vibrisse, 903. 
Pteropus medius: facial vibrissz (Fig. 
5), 897. 
Ptilorhis intercedens: ethology, 1070. 
Pyrrbula erythrocephala (z. s. u.), 943. 


Rangifer tarandus (z. s. u.), 943. 
Ratufa indica: facial vibrisss (Fig. 8), 
903. 
Reithrodon typicus: facial vibrisse, 
902. 
REPTILIA: 
Choco, Colombia : systematic, 813. 
Monte Bello Islands: systematic : 
ethology, 640. 
South Africa (fossil) : 
systematic, 995. 
Carnivorous Therapsids: systematic : 
structure, 1021. 
Chelonia : 


structure : 


structure: systematic, 
1011. 
Deinocephalia: systematic: struc- 
ture, 749. 


Lacerta czsaris from Canary Islands, 
681. 
Procolophon trigoniceps : systematic: 
structure, 735. 
Youngina capensis (fossil): syste- 
matic: structure, 1072. 
Rhabdometra cylindrica, sp. n.: 
structure (Figs. 1-10), 859, 
Rhadinea decorata, 816. 
Rhamphastos cuvieri (z. s. u.), 943. 


Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. LX XITI. 73 


XXV1 


Rhinobatus armatus, 650. 

Rhinobothryum lentiginosum, 816. 

Rhinocerotidx : facial vibrissa, 908. 

Rhinopoma microphyllum: facial vi- 
brissx (Fig. 5), 898; (z. s. u.), 943. 

Ihodona bipes, 641. 

Rhodostoma auris-felis, 667, 675. 

thombocephalus letus, 649. 

morsitans, 649. 

Rhophalodon, 774. 

Rhynchium australense, sp. u., 
623. 


Salwis tuberculatus, 649. 

Saragus sp., 647. | 

Sarcophilus harrisi: 
(Fig. 1), 891. | 

Scalpellum vimineum, sp. n. (Pl. 
I. figs, 10-12), 952. | 

Scaphella hedleyi, nom. n., 674. 

reticulata, 674. 

——- volva, 667. 

zebra, var., 667, 674. 

Schizophrys dama, 662. 

Sciurus prevosti: facial vibrisse, 903. 

vulgaris: facial vibrissz, 903. 

Scolopendra leta, 649. 

morsitans, 649. 

Scymnognathus whaitsi ?: 
(Figs. 3-5), 1027. 

Scymnosuchus whaitsi, 1027. | 

Sepiadarium, 677. 

auritum, sp. n. (Fig. 1), 678. 

Sepioloidea, 677. 

Serialaria semiconvoluta, 847, 

Sertularia pustulosa, 851. 

Sesamodon : structure (skull), 1025. 

Sitta frontalis (z. s. u.), 1057, 

Sorex araneus: facial vibrissx, 896. 

Spelerpes parvipes, 813. 

Speothos venaticus: feet (Fig. 1), 914. 

Sphex australis, 649, 

Spilotes megalolepis, 815. 

pullatus, 815. 

Spiochetopterus, 990, 

Spreo hildebrandti (z. s, L.), LOGO. 

Stigmatops indistineta perpleaa, 635, 

Stomatopora: structure (PI. TV. fig. 7), 
858. 


facial vibrissx 


structure 


INDEX. 


Strepsiceros imberbis (z. s. u.), 1058. 
STRUCTURE: 

Mammaria: Facial vibrisse, 889; 
Canide: Ursids: feet: rhinaria: 
facial vibrisse, 913; Martes 
martes: M. foina, 1062; ‘Tri- 
chosurus : Phaseolarctus: Chry- 
sochloris : dental variations, 1071. 

Reprinta: (fossil) 8. Africa, 995, 
1011, 1021; Procolophon trigoni- 
ceps, 735; Deinocephalia, 749; 
Youngina capensis (fossil), 1072. 

Pisces : Clupea harengus : abnormal, 
1060. 

Insncra: Lygus pabulinus: suction- 
mechanism, 685. 

Crustacra : Cirripedia, 950. 

Motuusca: Cephalopoda, 677. 

Potyzoa: ovicells, ete., 831. 

Vermipea : Chetopteride, 955 ; Mo- 
neecocestus, 1059; Rhabdometra, 
Otiditenia, 859. 

Subularia montebelloensis, 

sp. n. (Fig. 1), 673. 

Sylochelidon strenwus, 636. 
Sylvilagus superciliaris : facial vibrissee 

(Fig. 10), 905. 

Sympetes sp. 647. 
Symphyletes sp., 647. 


Tamandua tetradactyla: facial vibrissz, 
895. 

Tapinocephalus atherstonei: structure 
(Fig. 10), 762. 

Tapirus indicus: facial vibrisse (Fig. 
11), 906. 

Tayassu (Dicotyles) tajacu: facial vi- 
brissee (Fig. 12), 908. 

Telepsavus sp.: structure (Figs. 6-8), 
969. 

Tervia folini, 844. 

wrregularis (Pl. LV. fig. 8), 843. 

Thalamita dispar, nom. n. (Pl. I. 
fig. 4), 657. 

savignyt, 657. 


Thalarctos maritimus: 
930. 


Thecadactylus rapicauda, 814. 


feet (Hig. 9), 


INDEX. 


Vhylacinus cynocephalus: facial vi- | 


brissxe (Hig. 2), 891. 

Thynnus sp. 649. 

Tiliqua australis, 642. 

Titanosuchus: structure (Figs. 17, 18), 
769, 774. 

Ferox (Pl. V.), 769. 

Trachycystis fusco-olivacea, 803. 

nigrotincta, 803. 

Trachysphex (?) pilosulus, 649. 

Tragulus kanchil: facial vibrisse (Mig. 
13), 908. 

Tremarctos ornatus: feet, 936. 

thibetanus: feet: 
(Figs. 11, 13), 932, 937. 

Trichosurus vulpecula: cytology, 943; 
dental variation, 1071. 

fuliginosus: facial vibrissee 
(Fig. 3), 893. 

Tridacna elongata, 666. 

Trochozonites buhambaensis, 
sp. n. (PL. II. fig. 23), 804. 

expatriata, sp. n. (Pl. II. 
fig. 21), 805. 

—-kempi, sp. n. (Pl. IT. fig. 22), 
805. 

— suturalis, sp. n. (PI. II. fig. 24), 
805. 

Tropidonotus fuliginoides (z. s. L.), 
1059. 

Tropidorhynchus corniculatus (z. s. L.), 
1058. 

Trox crotcht, 647. 

Trynga ruficotlis, 638. 

Turbo squamosus, 666, 669. 

Typhlops ammodytes, sp. n. (Pl. 
I. figs. 8-10), 642. 


rhinarium 


Uca forcipata (Pl. II. fig. 8), 661. 

Urguessella, gen. n., 803. 

—— capillata, sp.n. (PI. IIT. fig. 28), 
S04. 

— cuticularis, sp. n. 
fig. 27), 804. 

——- esau, sp. un. (Pl. III. fig. 
804. 

urguessensis, sp. n. (Pl. ILI. 

fig. 25), 803. 


(Pl. III. 


XXVI11 


Uromys bruijnii: facial vibrisse (Fig. 8) 
901. 

Ursus americanus: feet: 
(Figs. 10, 13), 950, 937. 
arctos: feet (Fig. 9), 935. 

horribilis: feet, 935. 
Utetheisa pulchelloides, 645. ° 


rhinariura 


Valenciennea longipimnis, 650. 
Valkeria uva, 853. 
—— vidovici, 848. 

Tallentinia now Huvallentinia, 944. 
Vanessa kershawi, 644. 

Varanus acanthurus, 642. 
giganteus (z.s.u.), 1058. 
gouldii: ethology, 642. 
VARIATION: 


Mamata: Gazella scemmeringi, 
944. 
VERMIDEA: 
Cestoda : Moncecocestus: structure: 


systematic, 1039; Otiditsenia : 
structure : systematic, 879; Rhab- 
dometra : 
359. 
Polychzta from N.E. Pacific: syste- 
matic: development (Pls. I—-VL.: 
Figs. 1-13), 955. 
Verrucide : stiology, 950. 
Vesicularia dichotoma, 848. 
Voluta ohlita, 667. 
Vulpes bengalensis: feet: rhinarium - 
facial vibrisse (Fig. 8), 926. 
vulpes: feet (Fig. 8), 925. 


structure: systematic, 


Xanthias atromanus, 659. 

Xanthodes atromanus, 659. 

Xenodon colubrinus, 816. 
Xenorhynchus asiaticus (z. s. L.), 1058. 


Youngina capensis, gen. et sp. n- 
(Figs. 1, 2), 1075. 
Younginide, fam. nov., 1077. 


Zingis aurea, 802. 
bullata, 802. 


XXV1H 


Zingis consanguinea, 796. 


gaziensis, 795. 
gregorti, 802. 
kempi, 796. 
papyracea, 799. 
planispira, 800. 


INDEX. 


Zonitide: Central Africa (Pls. I.-III.), 
787. 

Zoobotryon pellucidum: structure (Pls. 
II]. figs. 4-12; IV. fig. 12), 849. 

Zostcrops balstoni, 635. 

lutea balstoni, 635.. 


Zoneginthus castanotis roebucki, 636. 


?RINTED BY TAYLOR AN 


D FRANCIS, RED LION COURT, FLEBT STRERT. 


PROCEEDINGS 


GENERAL MEETINGS FOR SCIENTIFIC BUSINESS 


OF THE 


ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY 
OF LONDON. 


1914. 


PART III. 
CONTAINING Paces 491 ro 944, wit 24 Pratzs 
AND 93 TEXT-FIGURES. 


PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY, 
SOLD AT ITS HOUSE IN REGENT’S PARK. 


LONDON : 
MESSRS. LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CoO,, 
: PATERNOSTER ROW. 


[Price Twelve Shiliinys. | 


Y< 


se 


nd 


LIST OF CONTENTS. 


1914, Part III. (pp. 491-944). - 


EXHIBITIONS AND NOTICES. 


Page 
The Srcrurary. Report on the Additions to the Society’s Menagerie during the month 
Of May 19IA: eae seis oo ie inielernne tpiate cen elete = ie tedare as Rise teas wield ite 3s eee 943 
Mr. J. Tuornron Carter, F.Z.8. Exhibition of Microphotographs of Mitosis in the Cells 
of the Enamel Organ in Dasyurus viverrinus and Trichosurus vulpecula ......++.00- 943 
Mr. R. 1. Pocock, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.Z.8., Curator of Mammals. Exhibition of a white 
specimen of Sommering’s Gazelle ....+... 1.0... sere ees de alse, Co seine eae 944 


The Rev. T. RB. BR. Stassine, M.A., F.R.S. Huvallentinia, nom. n. for Vallentinia Stebbing 944 


PAPERS. 


33. The Courtship-habits of the Great Crested Grebe (Podiceps cristatus); with an 
addition to the Theory of Sexual Selection. By Jutian S. Huxury, B.A., Professor 
of Biology inthe Rice Institute, Houston, Texas. (Plates I. & IL.)...... ote 491 


34. On the Species of Alastor (Paralastor) Sauss.,and some other Hymenoptera of the 
Family Eumenide. By R. C. L. Peruins, M.A., D.Sc., F.Z.8. (Plate I.) ...... e- 563 


35. A Report on the Fauna of the Monte Bello Islands. By P. D. Monraeus, B.A., 
Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge. (Plates I-IV.) .........ceccssceececs 625 » 


36. Stalk-eyed Crustaceans collected at the Monte Bello Islands. By Mary J. Rarusun, 
United States National Museum, Washington, D.C., U.S.A. (Plates I. & II.) ...... 653 


37. Report on Mollusca collected at the Monte Bello Islands, By Tom Irepaut, - 
(Text-figure 1.) ....... PRR RE TERETE IM aT HE ORL LO GRECO EERE ee) oan 665 — 


Contents continued on page 3 of Wrapper, 


Pa ZS) SSIs sah ial Sag ae. \l. 


Bale & Danielsson, Lt¢ 


COURTING-HABITS ‘OF PODICHPS CRISTATUS. 


ae 


Re 


I 2) Sales Supe Ie i 


— ee 
vt ee vo GF br | 


cai | cas a 
—_——————. 


Bale & Danielsson, 1*¢ 


COURTING-HABITS OF PODICEPS CRISTATUS. 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF TIE 


GENERAL MEETINGS FOR SCIENTIFIC BUSINESS 


OF THE 


ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON. 


PAPERS. Se 


33. The Courtship-habits* of the Great Crested Grebe 
(Podiceps cristatus); with an addition to the Theory 
of Sexual Selection. By Junian 8. Huxtey, B.A., 
Professor of Biology in the Rice Institute, Houston, 
Texas f. 
[Received March 14, 1914: Read April 21, 1914. ] 


(Plates I. & IL.) 


Inp5Ex. 
J. GENERAL Parr. Page 
APR tr ochuctrOne es ecceresctessees cas eter ca varscedecaceccvn cuts e sad cone AOU 
Dor AN peaiian Cele vat My sesnuey setae acces eine ees aaeNeaecumcemcesverscs 402 
3. Annual History .. Fas OS SON ees Re anish GEE SCaE Aine TOME meram oa) 
4. Some Detouatane. Beeuaiannwenanec enact sstntescetes oes cees S200 


6. The Relations of We exces 
(Go) eihevactiotepanuinopeee ss eee eceee eet neces OOD 


(Gis) Courtship iene see te sence eerie: Se nosatpeeeadccesweceet OOS 
Gus) Nest=bunl din cesarean error teeecntesestastasiensea Oil/Z! 
(iv.) Relations of different pairs .. ...........c00 eee SLL 
(@eaynOthewmachivitiespaen cae tee tec e aes eeceweseienien MOLE 
6. Discussion 522 


* Tt was not until this paper was in print that I realized that the word Courtship 
is perhaps misleading as applied to the incidents here recorded. While Courtship 
should, strictly speaking, denote only axte-nuptial behaviour, it may readily be 
extended to include any behaviour by which an organism of one sex seeks to “ win 
over” one of the opposite sex. It will be seen that the behaviour of the Grebe 
cannot be included under this.  ‘‘ Love-habits”? would be a better term in some 
ways; for the present, however, it is sufficient to point out the inadequacy of the 
present biological terminology. 

i Communicated by the SECRETARY. 

{ For explanation of the Plates see p. 561. 


Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. XXXV, 35 


499, MR. J. 8S. HUXLEY ON THE 


II. Sprcrar Parr. Page 
7. Locality, methods, etc. Man Te ome aweweciveie OLS 
8. Abstract of Selous’s orien aac Pa One, 
9. Further details regarding the Relations a he ‘Sirase 

(Gig) SUREISTIE oc oncmcdodanence ood cpa csa vac noo ana cc enoteaes¥gn a0 536 

(Gin) ING OMTGMINE: co oconan see nasece snp oeacoc\Gods00 000 0020E 537 

(iii.) Relations of different pairs ........0..0..00:ccceeeeee) 588 

TOW MRecordstronn any Notes peetencees te eters eee eS 

TIT, Wits Rear GUESS. cecdosdonsasca sssebocemecosRoctencvceu@accoseco, SOs 

TOP Postscuiptyseeeecerccee 599 
13. List of eters and Ciena GNames! of Davi: men- 

arnaGal Ayn tio Attends Joss vaboqaneutdnspeceonrcesooosdandaseuppeecs) | (OA) 

Aas 


1. InrrRopucTION. 


In these days the camera almost monopolizes the time and 
attention of those who take an interest in the life of birds. 
It has rendered splendid service, but I believe that it has almost 
exhausted its first field. At the present moment both zoology and 
photography would profit 1f naturalists for a little time would 
drop the camera in favour of the field-glass and the note-book. 
For the many who do not care alone using a telescope, the 
prismatic binocular has more than doubled the possibilities of 
field-observation ; and when full advantage shall have been taken 
of those possibilities, not only will science be the richer for z 
multitude of facts, but then, and only then, will the photo- 
grapher, now hard-pressed for new subjects, suddenly find a 
number of fresh avenues opened up to him. 

This second paper on the courtship-habits of British birds, 
like the first, will, I hope, help to show what wealth of interesting 
things still lie hidden in and about the breeding places of familiar 
birds. A good glass, a note-book, some patience, and a spare 
fortnight in the spring—with these I not only managed to 
discover many unknown facts about the Crested Grebe, but also 
had one of the pleasantest of holidays. ‘Go thou and do 
likewise.” 


I shall first give a connected account of my own and others’ 
observations, followed by a discussion ; and in a second part or 
appendix I shall give in detail some of the material worked 
up in the first part, as well as some notes on various points not 
connected with the main subject of the paper. 


2. APPEARANCE, 


Structure first, function afterwards: I must describe something 
of the bird’s appearance before attempting to give an account of 
its habits, though I shall try to be as brief as possible, since any 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 493 


standard work of descriptive ornithology will give full details of 
the plumage and taxonomic characters. The Great Crested 
Grebe, then, is of course a water-bird, and essentially a diving-bird. 
Its tail is remarkable in being reduced to a few tiny feathers, 
and its legs are set as far back as possible, so as to have the 
position of a ship’s propellers. Its body is long and approaches 
the cylindrical; the neck is very long and flexible, the head flat, 
the beak sharp, long, and powerful. In colour, the Great 
Crested Grebe has back and flanks of much the same smoky 
mottled brown as its small cousin, the Dabchick; the underparts, 
however, including the chin, throat, and front of the neck, are of 
an exquisitely pure white (furnishing the ‘‘ Grebe” of commerce). 
The back of the neck is very dark brown. 

The chief ornament of the bird, the crest from which it takes 
its name, is reserved for the head. In these pages I shall use 
the word crest to denote all the erectile feathers of the head taken 
together. The crest, as thus defined, consists of two parts—the 
ear-tufts (or ears, a8 for brevity’s sake they may be called) and 
the ruff. 

Both are composed of special narrow, elongated feathers, stiff, 
and formed of comparatively few barbs. Those constituting the 
ears are black, all of about the same length, and spring in two 
tufts from the top of the head, above the tympanum. The ruff 
is bigger and more elaborate: it consists of a broad band of 
feathers springing from the sides of the face and head, their free 
ends pointing downwards and backwards on either side of the 
neck. If we take the part of the head behind the eye, we find 
that at first the feathers are of the ordinary length, then slightly 
elongated (the beginning of the ruff), and then longer and longer 
till we get to the hinder border of the ruff. Corresponding to 
the increase of length there is a change in colour., The proximal 
(upper) part of the ruff is white, then we get to vivid chestnut, 
and this deepens gradually to glossy black (see any good picture 
of the Crested Grebe). 

Both ruff and ears are extremely erectile; and as the birds 
make great play with them during all the actions of courtship, 
the various positions into which they can be put must be 
described. 

Let us begin with the ears. These, when depressed or shut, 
stretch straight out backwards, continuing the line of the flat 
head’s crown. When shut forcibly, the feathers of which they 
are made are close together and all parallel. 

Often, however, they are not thus “at attention,” but ‘standing 
at ease,” to use a military metaphor: then the tufts as a whole 
point in the same direction, but their component feathers diverge 
and bristle-out a bit, This seems to be the usual and most 
restful condition. 

Further, the tufts may be erected: and they may be erected in 
two ways—either laterally ov vertically. When erected laterally, 
they stick out horizontally at right angles to the head, so that 

35% 


494 MR. J. S. HUXLEY,ON THE 


from the sides they can scarcely be seen, as they are’ end-on to 
the eyes. When erected vertically, they seem, when viewed from 
the side, to be sticking straight upwards ; but when they are 
seen from in front, it is found that they diverge from each other 
at a considerable angle (Pls. I. & II. figs. 4, 5, 11). Durmeg 
erection, the individual feathers always diverge fanwise very 
considerably. Thus there are four conditions of the ear-tufts 
to be distinguished. 
They may be:—(a) Depressed. 
(1) Shut tight. 
(2) At rest (relaxed). 
(b) Hrected. 
(3) Vertically. 
(4) Laterally. 


The ruff is more complex in its attitudes, as im its structure. 
During depression it, too, may be either shut tight or lying easy. 
When really shut, it bears from the side a curious resemblance to 
the gill-covers of some eel-like fish : its rounded hinder border lies 
along the side of the cylindrical neck, whose outlines its own 
scarcely overlap, either dorsally or ventrally (fig. 1). When re- 
laxed (at rest), this resemblance disappears, for the feathers all 
diverge slightly, and the smooth appearance of the surface is 
lost. 

When the ruff is erected, the feathers composing it may be 
made to diverge in a single plane only, the original (longitudinal- 
vertical) plane of the “ gill-cover,” or they may diverge outwards 
as well, making an angle with the side of the head (movement in 
the transverse, as well as the sagittal plane). I do not think that 
they are ever moved in the transverse plane alone. Asa result 
of these movements, three chief forms can be taken on by the 
ruff. First there is the curtain form, m which motion in the 
vertical plane alone takes place, the ventral edge being brought 
forward till it makes an acute angle with the line of the chm 
(fig. 3), the two halves thus hanging like curtains on either side 
of the head. Then there is the pear-shaped condition (figs. 4, 
11), where there is a consideyable amount of forward and a 
moderate amount of transverse motion. The ruff in this state 
has its vertical height greater than its breadth (fig. 5). Owing 
to the transverse bristling of the feathers, the two halves of the 
vuff almost blend into a single whole; they can scarcely be 
distinguished either from the front or, stall less, from behind, 
whereas in the curtain form they are very distinct. Finally, 
there is the elliptical form, when, added to the same amount of 
Jongitudinal motion, the greatest possible amount of transverse 
bristling has taken place. The ruff is now actually broader than 
it is high (fig. 9), and the blending of the two halves is practically 
complete. There are, of course, intermediate states. Instead 
of “full pear-shaped,” you may have ‘half pear-shaped ” ; 


Ly | ; and 
between pear-shaped and elliptical there comes the circular. 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 495 


The three I have named, however, are those which the bird 
usually adopts. 
The ruff, therefore, may be :— 


(a) Depressed. 
(1) Shut tight (‘ gill-cover”). 
(2) At rest (relaxed), 

(b) Hrected. 
(3) Curtain-like (motion of feathers in one plane). 
(4) Pear-shaped 
(5) Elliptical 


By a combination of particular positions of ruff, ears, and neck, 
and sometimes wings and body too, the birds can assume a 
number of characteristic and often-recurring attitudes, which are 
the raw materials, so to speak, of all the elaborate habits of 
courtship. j 

Before giving any more definitions, I will now give an outline 
of the Grebe’s annual history, and then go on to describe some of 
the actual happenings that I saw, in order to give an idea of the 
problems to be solved. Then I shall try to define and classify 
the various courtship-habits, and discuss the general bearing of 
the facts. 


} (motion of feathers in two planes). 


3. ANNUAL History. 


This is somewhat as follows *. About the first week of 
February they leave the sea-coast and fly back in bands to the in- 
land waters where they breed. They live in flocks for about three 
weeks, and then start pairing-up. Pairing-up lasts altogether 
about a fortnight, bringing us to mid-March. From this time 
ou to the end of summer, the unit is neither the flock nor the 
individual, but the family, represented at first by the pair. 
About the beginning of April nest-building begins, and by the 
end of the month every nest will have eggs. The family parties 
live together through the summer, though apparently the cock 
leaves the hen to look after the young when they are half-grown 
(Pycraft, ’11). There is usually no second brood unless the first 
is destroyed. At the end of September they gather into flocks 
again, and live thus for well over a month, finally leaving for the 
sea-coast in the second week of November. 

The period of pairing-up itself I have unfortunately not been 
able to observe; the keeper tells me that there is much flying and 
chasing about. The part played by the “courtship” in the actual 
pairing-up is thus left uncertain. From analogy with other birds 
and with ourselves we should expect that the chasing was the 
expression of felt but unreasoned likes and dislikes, and that the 
courtship-actions were only gone through after the two birds had 
become fairly well-disposed towards each other. The courtship- 


* The dates refer to the movements of the birds at Tring Reservoir, and have 
been given me by the head-keeper there. 


496 MR. J. 8. HUXLEY ON THE 


actions, I am told, are at any rate to be seen immediately after 
pairing- up. 
4. Some DescrrPrions. 


(a) Let us start with the commonest of all the scenes of court- 
ship—the one which had first attracted and puzzled me years ago, 
and led me to choose the Grebe as a bird to watch. 

As the birds ride on the water, very little of their under- 
surface is usually visible; but now and then a twinkle of white is 
seen. This may be merely a bird rolling half over to preen its 
belly; but if it proceed from two birds close together, this form 
of courtship is almost sure to be in progress. In such a case, the 
glass reveals that the two birds are always a pair, cock and hen ; 
they are facing each other, their beaks perhaps a foot, perhaps a 
mere couple of inches apart, their necks held up perfectly straight 
and elongated to a truly surprising extent. It is this holding up 
of the neck that shows some of the white of throat and breast. 
Their ears ave erected vertically and their ruffs are full pear- 
shaped. he few little feathers that do duty for a tail are 
cocked up as far as they will go—that is to say, about half an 
inch (fig. 11). 

In this attitude the birds proceed to go through a curious set 
ritual. 

Let us describe a particular case. A pair of birds, cock and 
hen, that had been fishing not far apart, suddenly approached 
each other, raising their necks and rufts as they did so, till by 
the time they had got face to face they were in the attitude I 
have just described. Then they both began shaking their heads 
at each other in a peculiar and formal-looking manner. Each 
bird began by waggling its head violently from side to side, 
some four or five times in quick succession, like a man nodding 
emphatic dissent. Then the quick side-to-side motion gave place 
to a slow one, and the beak and head were swung slowly across 
and back, with a seemingly vague and enquiring action, as if the 
bird were searching the horizon for it knew not what. The head 
was moved back and forth perhaps a couple of times, and then 
the violent shaking beganagain. This alternation of shaking and 
slow side-to-side swinging was repeated over and over again by 
each bird: strangely enough, the pair kept no time with each 
ether—the violent shakings of the two neither coincided nor 
alternated, but each shook and swung without any apparent 
reference to the other’s rhythm. 

After six or seven repetitions of the performance another 
action came in. After the slow swing and before the wageling 
(or sometimes, I think, taking the place of the slow swinging), 
but not every time, the bird bent its neck right back and down as 
if to preen its wings, put its beak under some of the wing-feathers 
near the tail, raised them an inch or so, let them fall, and brought 
its head swiftly hack into position for another of the violent 
shakings. This action had obviously something to do with 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 497 


preening, but had an extraordinary look, as of a stereotyped 
and meaningless relic. The birds seemed to be performing some 
routine-action absent-mindedly and by mere force of association, 
as one may sometimes see a man wind up his watch in the day- 
time, just because he has been changing his waistcoat. 

Finally, after each bird had given about a dozen or fifteen 
violent shakes, with a corresponding number of slow swings and 
liftings of wings in between, they veered up into the wind almost 
simultaneously, lowered their crests, brought their necks down, 
and, in a word, became normal once more both in appearance and 
behaviour. 

One must have names for things if one is going to discuss them, 
as any philosopher will tell you. So I propose to call a whole 
performance such as that just described a bout of shaking; each 
little time of violent wagegling I shall call simply @ shake, and 
shall measure the length of a bout by the number of shakes in it 
(counting the shakes of both birds added together). Finally, the 
curious actions resembling preening I shall call habit-preening, 
because I believe them to have (or rather, to have had) something 
to do with real preening, but, in the per formance as gone through 
to-day, to have "eCoUne & : mere habit, vestigial so far as its or iginal 
function is concerned. 


(5) That is one little seene: now take another. 

A solitary bird, which proved to be a hen, came flying over from 
one reservoir to another. She alighted near one shore and began 
swimming slowly across towards the other, meanwhile alternating 
between two attitudes. 

First of all she arched her neck right forward till the bill, 
which pointed slightly downwards, was just above the water. 
The ears meanwhile were scarcely erected ; the ruff was thrown 
forward in curtain-form, and thus, since the head had been 
brought so far forwards and downwards, actually swept the 
water on either side (fig. 3). So she progressed, looking from 
side to side, and now and then giving a short barking call. 
After four or five of these calls, which represented perhaps 20 or 
30 seconds of time, she put down her ruff and raised her neck 
nearly straight up to enlarge her circle of vision. 

After some seconds of looking about her in this position, she 
relapsed again into the first attitude—‘ with neck outstretched, 
you fancy how.” This was repeated eight or nine times, til at 
last a cock, thirty or forty yards away, appeared to notice the 
ealling bird. He pricked up his neck, looked towards her for a 
short “une. and then dived. At eh she changed her whole 
demeanour. Up went her wings: back hebween them, with 
erected ruff and ears, went her head. A glance at fig. 7 will 
show her attitude. The wings were brought up, half- spread on 
either side of the body, with their antorion border pointing down- 
wards. They were almost in the transverse plane, but sloped 
slightly backwards from the water. 


498 MR. J. 8S. HUXLEY ON THE 


In this position the beautiful white bar formed by the marginal 
wing-coverts, along the anterior margin of the wing, and the 
broad white blaze formed by the secondaries, which are quite 
invisible when the wings are closed, shone out vividly. The gap 
between the wings was filled by the head ; this from the front 
somewhat resembled an old-fashioned picture of the sun, with the 
ruff rayed out considerably all round, and the ears were erected 
laterally so as to fit on to the top of the ruff on either side. 
Below the head shone the white of the puffed-out breast. The 
bird’s whole appearance was wonderfully striking, and as unlike 
as possible to that of its everyday self. 

All this took but an instant; directly the cock had dived she 
was in this attitude. As she waited for his re-appearance she 
turned eagerly from side to side, swinging nearly to the right- 
about and back again as if not to miss him. Kventually he came 
up, three or four feet on the far side, and facing away from her 
in the most amazing attitude. I could scarcely believe my eyes. 
He seemed to grow out of the water. First his head, the ruff 
nearly circular, the beak pointing down along the neck in a stiff 
and peculiar manner; then the neck, quite straight and vertical ; 
then the body, straight and vertical too; until finally the whole 
bird, save for a few inches, was standing erect in the water, and 
reminding me of nothing so much as the hypnotized phantom of 
a rather slender Penguin. 

As I say, it grew out of the water, and as it grew it gradually 
revolved on its long axis until at its fullest height it came to face 
the hen. Though all this was done with an unhurried and 
uniform motion, yet of course it took very little time. Then 
from his stiff, erect position he sank slowly on to the surface; the 
hen meanwhile put down her wings and raised her neck; and the 
pair settled down to a bout of the head-shaking. Their attitudes 
and actions were practically the same as those of the pair described 
above, but the bout only lasted about half as long. It was ended 
by the two birds ceasing to shake and gradually drifting apart. 
Finally they put down their crests and went off together to preen 
themselves and fish. 

These actions, too, must now be named. I propose to call 
the attitude of the hen as she searched and called for her mate 
the Dundreary-attitude, for the two halves of the ruff in curtain- 
form give the bird, especially when seen from the front, a con- 
siderable resemblance to that famous personage of the drama. 
The attitude later assumed by the hen, with head back and wings 
arched, shall be the Cat-attitude, for the round ruff gives the bird 
the look of a very contented and somewhat fat cat. The cock’s 
combined dive and emergence I shall call the Ghost-dive. The whole 
ceremony I have called the Discovery Ceremony (see p. 512). 


(c) Now for the highest development of the courtship-actions 
that I have seen. The incident I am going to describe took place 
in the middle of the hour-and-a-half’s watching the results of 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 499 


which are recorded on p. 549. A pair of birds had been preening 
themselves and fishing, with occasional languid bouts of head- 
shaking. After a dive they came up not far apart and swam to- 
gether with outstretched necks, which, as they neared each other, 
they gradually raised, beginning to shake their heads a little at 
the same time. The raising and the shaking progressed simul- 
taneously, till when the birds were face to face they were in the 
regular ‘“‘shaking” attitude and waggling their heads with a 
vengeance. The bout of shaking thus begun was the longest I ever 
saw : between them the birds shook their heads no less than 84 
times, and with as much vigour at the eighty-fourth as at the first 
shake. There was rather a curious difference between the cock 
and the hen. At first neither of the birds did any of the wing- 
lifting, the strange parody of preening described above, and 
there named habit-preening. After the fifteenth shake, the hen 
began to give an occasional wing-lift, and these became more and 
more frequent on her part, until after about the sixtieth shake 
she was turning round and putting her beak under her wing- 
feathers between nearly every shake. The cock, on the other hand, 
did not begin this habit-preening until after the fortieth shake, 
and even after that only repeated the trick at rare intervals. 

At the close of the bout, the pair swung parallel, but did not 
bring their necks down. Nor did they lower their ruffs; on the 
contrary, they put them up still further, from the pear-shaped 
form customary for shaking to the extreme elliptical, bringing 
down their ears meanwhile from the vertical to the lateral posi- 
tion, so that the whole crest now appeared like a large chestnut- 
and-black Elizabethan ruff. This change in the crests made me 
think something exciting was going to happen. Sure enough, 
the hen soon dived. The cock waited in the same attitude, 
motionless, for perhaps a quarter of a minute. Then he, too, 
dived. Another quarter of a minute passed. Then the hen 
appeared again, and a second or two later, some twenty-five yards 
away, the cock came up as well. 

They were in a crouching position, with necks bent forward, 
ruffs still elliptical, and both were holding in their beaks a bunch 
of dark ribbony weed, which they must have pulled from the 
bottom. The hen looked about her eagerly when she first came 
up: when the cock appeared she put her head down still further 
and swam straight towards him at a good pace. He caught sight 
of her almost immediately too, and likewise lowering his head, 
made off to meet her. They did not slacken speed at all, and I 
wondered what would happen when they met. My wonder was 
justified : when about a yard apart they both sprang up from the 
water into an almost erect position, looking somewhat like the 
‘“‘shostly Penguin” already described. Sprang is perhaps too 
strong a word; there was no actual leap, but a very quick 
rising-up of the birds. The whole process, however, was much 
quicker and more vigorous than the slow “ growing out of the 
water ” of the ghost-dive. In addition, the head was here not 


500 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


bent down along the neck, but held slightly back, the beak hori- 
zontal, still holding the weed. Carrying on with the impetus of 
their motion, the two birds came actually to touch each other 
with their breasts. From the common fulcrum thus formed 
bodies and necks alike sloped slightly back—the birds would have 
fallen forwards had each not thus supported the other. Only the 
very tip of the body was in the water, and there I could see a 
great splashing, showing that the legs were hard at work. The 
appearance either bird presented to its mate had changed alto- 
gether in an instant of time. Before, they had been black and 
dark mottled brown : they saw each other now all brilliant white, 
with chestnut and black surrounding the face in a circle. 

In this position they stayed for a few seconds rocking gently 
from side to side upon the point of their breasts; it was an 
ecstatic motion, as if they were swaying to the music of a dance. 
Then, still rocking and still in contact, they settled very gradually 
down on to the surface of the water; so gradually did they sink 
that I should think their legs must have been continuously 
working against their weight. All this time, too, they had been 
shaking their heads violently at frequent intervals, and after 
coming down from the erect attitude they ended the performance 
by what was simply an ordinary bout of rather excited shaking ; 
the only unusual thing about it was that the birds at the begin- 
ning were still, I think, actually touching each other. The weed 
by this time had all disappeared: what had happened to it was 
very hard to make out, but I believe that some of it was thrown 
away, and some of it eaten by the birds while settling down from 
the Penguin position. 

In their final bout they shook about twenty times, getting less 
excited towards the end ; they eventually drifted apart, put their 
crests down, and almost at once began to pick food off the surface 
of the water. 

Let us call the diving for water-weed and the appearing again 
with it in the bill the weed-trick ; and the rapid swimming to- 
gether, with the subsequent figure erect breast-to-breast, let us 
call the Penguin-dance, for here once more the general resemblance 
to Penguins (exceptionally graceful ones, let us admit) forced 
itself upon the mind. 


(d) One last scene before we pass from mere description to the 
heavier task of analysis. 

Sitting on the bank one day, looking ‘out over a broad belt of 
low flags and rushes which here took the place of the usual 
Arundo, I saw a Grebe come swimming steadily along parallel to 
the bank, bending its head forward a little with each stroke, as is 
the bird’s way in all but very leisurely swimming. I happened 
to look further on in the direction in which it was going, and 
there, twenty or thirty yards ahead of it, I saw what I took to be 
a dead Grebe floating on the water, The body was rather humped 
up; the neck was extended perfectly straight in the line of the 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 501 


body, flat upon the surface of the water; the ruff and ears were 
depressed (fig. 8). So convinced was I that this was a dead bird 
that I at once began revolving plans for wading in and fetching 
it out directly the other bird should have passed it by. Mean- 
while, I wanted to see whether the living would show ary interest in 
the dead, and was therefore much interested to see the swimming 
bird swim up to the tail-end of the corpse and then a little way 
alongside of it, bending its head down a bit as if to examine the 
body. Then it came back to the tail-end, and then, to my 
extreme bewilderment, proceeded to scramble out of the water on 
to the said tail-end; there it stood for some seconds, in the 
customary and very ungraceful out-of-water attitude—the body 
nearly upright, leaning slightly forward, the neck arched back and 
down, with a snaky Cormorant-look about it, the ruff and ears 
depressed. Then it proceeded to waddle awkwardly along the 
body to the head end, slipping off thence into the water and 
eracefulness once more. Hardly had it done this when the 
supposed corpse lifted its head and neck, gave a sort of jump, and 
it, 400,.was Swimming in the water by the other’s side. It was 
now seen that the “ corpse” had been resting its body on a half- 
made nest whose top was scarcely above the water, and it was 
this which had given it the curious hunched-up look. The two 
swam about together for a bit, but soon parted company without 
evincing any further particular interest in each other. 

Both these birds had crests of very much the average size, so 
that it was hard to tell their sex ; but I think that the “ corpse” 
was a hen, the other bird a cock. 

The meaning of this action (which I only saw this one time) 
remained extremely problematical to me while I was at the 
Reservoirs. The mystery will, however, be solved in the next 
section, and so let us anticipate and call the attitude of the 
“corpse” the passive, that of the bird that climbed on the 


eS) 


*“ corpse’s ” back the active pairing attitude. 


5. Tar RELATIONS OF THE SEXES IN THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 
(i.) The Act of Pairing. 


As I say, it was especially the proceeding last described which 
puzzled me; and it was not till I had got home and looked up 
the literature, that I found a welcome paper by Selous (01) * 
which exactly dovetailed into my own observations. I had 
been mainly concerned with the behaviour of the birds on 
the open water and during incubation; he had paid special 
attention to nest-building and pairing His observations solve 
the mystery that has so far surrounded the Grebes’ actual 
pairing ; by them it is now established that the attitude which 
so puzzled me is adopted always, and only, for the purpose of 
coition, and that coition takes place solely on the nest. 1 should 


* A short summary of this paper will be found on p. 529, 


502 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


perhaps have said “on a nest”; for the birds may build several 
incomplete nests or platforms before one, finally chosen to be 
the true nest, is finished and laid in. 

From Selous’s observations, the actions and ceremonies con- 
nected with coition are quite elaborate—almost of the same 
order of elaboration as the courtship-ceremonies, though the 
two rituals are completely independent and appear to have 
developed along quite different lines. 

We have already got to know the passive and the active 
pairing attitudes. To complete the description of the mere 
attitudes, it remains to add that, before sinking down into 
the passive pairing attitude (which Selous calls “lying along 
the water’), the birds usually assume a curious fixed and rigid 
pose. I will quote Selous’s words:—“. . . curling his neck over 
and down, with the bill pointing at the ground [weeds], perhaps 
six inches above it, he stood thus, fixed and rigid, for some 
moments (as though making a point) before sinking down and 
lying all along. There was no mistaking the entirely sexual 
character of this strange performance, the peculiar fixed rigidity 
full of import and expression.” 

We must now see how the attitudes are combined in the 
actions themselves. 

In the first place, we have the active pairing attitude and 
the actions associated with it. These actions in pairing have 
been already once described, and they seem to show little 
variation. The bird leaps up, and comes down almost upright 
near the other’s tail. Copulation is then attempted. Selous 
found it hard to decide if such an attempt was successful or 
not. When it seemed successful, the birds apparently uttered a 
louder cry than usual, and afterwards their behaviour had a 
satisfied look. Once, however, when the birds seemed thus 
satisfied, he adds: ‘‘The time occupied was extremely short, 
and one would hardly have thought from the position of the 
two birds that actual pairing had been possible.” In other 
cases he could be fairly sure that the attempt was not successful. 
Whether successful or not, the act always ends in the peculiar 
way already described: the active bird waddles forwards along 
the other’s body, and walks somehow over its head into the 
water, upon which the passive bird raises its neck, leaves the 
nest or platform, and swims away in normal position. 

In the second place, we find that the passive attitude (‘lying 
along”) may take place either on the nest or platform itself, or 
else on the open water (but then apparently never far from the 
nest); the act of pairing itself, however, is possible only when 
the *‘ passive” bird is lying on some firm support. In the second 
place, both cock and hen go into this attitude (the precise attitude 
which the lower bird assumes during the act of coition) indis- 
criminately : Selous’s records give an approximately equal number 
of times for the two sexes. 

However, before trying to draw any general conclusions, let us 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 503 


take a particular case—that described by Selous on pp. 180-181 
of his paper :— 

About an hour earlier in the day there had been an attempt at 
pairing. Then, after a period of rest on the open water, the 
birds swam together towards the nest (which had been built 
the day before). When just outside the bed of reeds in which 
the nest was situated, the hen went into the passive attitude, 
on the open water. The cock came up to her, swam a few yards 
past her, went twice back to her and away again, then went 
right into the weeds and himself lay along the water in the 
passive attitude. While he was doing this (or immediately 
afterwards) the hen swam to the nest, leapt on to it, and sank 
down in the passive attitude once more. Upon this the cock 
came up to the nest, jumped on to the hen’s back, and they 
apparently paired successfully, both birds meanwhile uttering a 
special shrill screaming cry. 

Here are various points to be noticed. The joint approach of 
the birds to the neighbourhood of the nest is invariable when 
they have previously been some distance away. When one bird 
is sitting, or when both are already close to the nest, as when 
building is in progress, the case is of course different (p. 533); 
but in the period between nest-building and incubation they 
seem never to approach the nest singly. 

The passive attitude on the open water close to the weeds and 
nest may or may not be assumed. In the three cases where 
this happened and Selous is absolutely sure of his facts, the bird 
that assumed this position was the female, and was also the 
leader in the procession towards the weeds. (We want to know 
more about this. It seems probable, from other considerations, 
that it is a mere coincidence for the leader to have been always 
the hen; but, this being granted, it is quite likely that the 
leading bird would be the more eager, and so would hasten to 
put itself into the attitude which apparently expresses readiness 
to pair.) In other cases the birds swam straight to the nest, 
and one of them ascended it and then went into the passive 
position. 

Next, the way in which the cock swam about close to the hen 
while she was in the passive attitude, but still on the open water, 
“as though about to pair” (I quote Selous), is interesting. 
There must be a strong association established between the sight 
of the passive attitude and the desire to pair, so that the active 
bird shows its thoughts, so to speak, even when pairing is 
impossible (as when the passive bird is on the open water). 

When the passive bird has gone into position on the nest, it is 
very nearly always the case that the active bird comes up to the 
passive one and examines it or swims about a bit, whether an 
attempt to pair is afterwards made (Selous, ’01, pp. 180, 345) or 
not (loc. cit. pp. 165, 344, etc.). Sometimes the second bird is not 
eager, and refuses to come near at all (¢. 9., loc. cit. pp. 172, 456). 
At other times (loc. cit. p. 341, and perhaps p. 181) an attempt 


5O4 MR. J. 8S. HUXLEY ON THE 


to pair is made, and the active bird jumps up apparently 
at once, without any delay. In the case observed by me the 
active bird seemed very definitely to examine the passive one, 
poking its beak down close to it; but the examination was very 
short, the attempt at pairing following immediately. 

When the active bird is moderately eager but not quite eager 
enough to attempt to pair, it may swim up to the passive bird 
a number of times, each time make as if to spring up, and then 
decide not to, but swim away again. 

The assumption of the passive attitude by one bird is generally, 
so far as I can see, used as an invitation to the other bird to 
pair: perhaps I should express myself rather differently, and say 
that it always denotes readiness to pair, and is generally used as 
a primary excitant—i. ¢., it is the first sign given by either of the 
birds of readiness to pair. This is well brought out by incidents 
such as this:—Both birds are building the nest; suddenly the 
hen jumps up on to the nest and goes into the passive attitude, 
every now and then raising her neck and looking round at the 
cock (Selous, op. cit.). At other times it may be only a secondary 
excitant—a mere symbol, This may happen when one bird is 
sitting and the other approaches the nest; the sitting bird may 
then assume the passive position at each approach of the other. 
Here the approach is the primary stimulus, and the assumption 
of the passive attitude is called forth by it, and not by internal 
causes. In this second case a less degree of ‘‘ sexual feeling” is 
presumably needed to induce the passive attitude than in the 
first case. 

But we are going too fast. We must not omit to notice the 
curious action of the cock in himself copying the hen’s passive 
attitude. This action—one bird going into the passive attitude, 
the other coming up and examining it, and then going off and 
assuming the same attitude—appears only to occur when the first 
bird goes into position on the open water (and not on the nest), 
and even then not always. It seems, however, to happen in the 
majority of cases (though we are perforce generalizing from very 
few instances). It looks as if it were a signal to the first bird 
that the second was ready and willing to proceed further in the 
matter; for the birds after this may proceed together to the nest, 
where the first (Joc. cit. p. 180) or the second (ibid. p. 456) bird 
ascends the nest and assumes the passive attitude once more. 
In other cases, however (ibid. pp. 179, 454), the affair ended with 
the second bird’s assumption of the attitude. Here it looks as if 
a ritual ceremony was developing out of a useful action (see 
below). 

As regards the actual act of pairing (or its attempt, which for 
our present purpose comes to the same thing), the two sexes seem 
here also to play interchangeable roles. In 1900 Selous saw three 
attempts to pair, one apparently successful, two unsuccessful : 
in all three cases the active bird was the larger of the pair.. 
In 1901 he saw two attempts, both of which he thinks were 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE, 505 


successful: here the active bird was in both cases the smaller of 
the pair. 

Now, if we could be sure that the 1901 pair was the same that 
was there in 1900, all would be well: but we cannot be sure. 
There was a marked difference in the pairing-behaviour of the 
1900 and 1901 pairs—a difference that cannot be referred back 
to the fact that in 1900 the birds were building a true nest and 
were incubating, while in 1901 they had only got to the length 
of building a pairing-platform. In 1900 the smaller bird (that 
we have so far presumed to be the hen) was more forward in 
invitation, while the active pairing-position was adopted by the 
larger bird alone; im 1901 the case was exactly reversed. It 
would be, in my opinion, more remarkable that such a change 
of character should take place in two birds in the space of 
one year than that the same water should be occupied by two 
different pairs—albeit but a single one—in two successive years. 
Mr. Selous, however, writes to me that for various reasons 
(e. g., the site of the nest, etc.) he is practically convinced that 
the birds were the same in both years. However, whether the 
pair was the same pair or not, in both years there was a marked 
difference in size both of body and crest between the two birds 
of the pair, and, if all the books are not wrong, this should be 
quite enough to distinguish the sexes. Sometimes, it is true, 
the two birds of a pair are almost exactly alike; but nowhere 
do I find it stated that the hen is ever larger or has a better 
crest than the cock. It is the part of the professional orni- 
thologist to find out if this is ever so; till then, we must be 
content to say that it is extremely probable that either cock or 
hen can play the “active” part in copulation—what we should 
usually call the male part. This can be more easily imagined 
in birds than in almost any other animals in which copulation 
takes place, but even in a bird is remarkable enough. Definite 
attitudes of the two participating organisms have been evolved to 
facilitate the passage of genital products in a definite direction : 
and here, hey presto! although the genital products continue to 
pass in the same direction, yet the attitudes, developed only in 
relation with and accessory to this direction, are at will reversed. 

This facultative reversal of pairing-position would certainly be 
remarkable; but even for the moment supposing that it does 
not occur in our Grebe, it would merely appear as the as yet 
unattained end of a process of sex-equalization which in this 
species has already run a considerable course. This process 
consists in a gradual transference of all the secondary sexual 
characters of the male to the female, and vice versa. In its 
general aspect it will be discussed later; here it will be sufficient 
to consider it in relation to the pairing actions alone. 

Let us see what is without doubt common to both sexes in the 
Crested Grebe to-day. First of all, we find that either cock or 
hen may lead the way towards the pairing-platform. Secondly, 
either cock or hen may assume the passive pairing-positien (the 


506 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


position that one would naturally call Jemale) on the open water. 
Thirdly, either cock or hen may assume this position on the nest 
or pairing-platform. This is important, for the pairing-platform 
is never ascended except for the purpose of pairing, or for this 
position, which we may call the beginning of, or the invitation to, 
pairing, and the nest only ascended for these two purposes and for 
incubation. Fourthly, when one bird is in the passive position, 
the other, be it cock or hen, may come up to it, examine it, and 
make as if to leap up on to it, just as it often does before an 
actual attempt at pairing is made. The natural end of this 
sequence would be that, fifthly, either cock or hen might not 
only make as if to ascend into the active position, but actually 
do so. If the text-books are right in their descriptions of the 
sexes in the species, then we can say that this end has been 
reached, and that, as far as pairing-positions go, the sexes are 
interchangeable. If the text-books are wrong, then our evidence 
is simply insufficient. Here it can only be shown that, however 
incredible this reversal may appear, yet it is quite certain that 
in the Great Crested Grebe all the preliminary steps towards 
it have been already taken. 

Further, Selous (loc. cit.) places on record some remarkable 
facts which show that reversal of pairing-attitude does take place 
in tame Pigeons. Here he several times saw, immediately after 
the act of pairing, the “male” bird crouch, and the ‘“ female” 
then get into the normal male attitude. The act of pairing was 
then gone through a second time, but with the attitudes of the 
birds reversed. See also Selous ’02. 

We have therefore evidence that the full reversal can take 
place, aud now only want to be certain that it has taken place in 
this species. In any case we can say that characters (in this case 
attitudes and actions only) of the female have been transferred to 
the male, as well as characters of the male to the female. 

We must now go on to consider a very different question, 
which is also well brought out in the pairing-habits of the Great 
Crested Grebe: I mean the gradual change of a useful action 
into a symbol and then into a ritual: or, in other words, the 
change by which the same act which first subserved a definite 
purpose directly comes later to subserve it only indirectly 
(symbolically), and then not at all. The action in question 
here is the passive pairing-attitude, and the Grebe is interesting 
as showing all three stages of the process at one time—the 
passive attitude employed sometimes directly, sometimes sym- 
bolically, and sometimes ritually. Speaking phylogenetically, 
we have the following steps :— 

(1) The ascent on to a nest or platform, and the assumption 
of the passive attitude, are necessary if pairing is to take place, 
and the passive bird must get into position before the active 
bird can even begin its part in the coition act. 

(2) The ascent and the attitude are used by the passive bird as 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 507 


an incentive to the active bird, as a sign of readiness to pair. 
The active bird may or may not respond. 

(3) As a symbol, the attitude is obviously more important than 
the actual ascent on to the nest, since the attitude is used only in 
pairing, while the birds may ascend the nest for various purposes; 
and, in addition, the assumption of the attitude comes after the 
ascent, and is thus in time more immediately associated with 
the act of pairing. Thus the attitude by itself comes to be used 
on the open water (though always close to the nest) as a sign of 
readiness to pair. We may say that readiness to pair is indicated 
precociously —it is pushed back astep. Such processes of pushing 
back are very common in early ontogeny ; embryologists then say 
that the time of appearance of the character is cenogenetic (even 
though the character itself, as here, may be palingenetic). The 
phylogenetic change has here been precisely similar ; the only 
difference is that the displacement affects a mature instead of a 
very early period of lite. 

(4) The attitude being now sometimes a mere symbol can be, 
and is, employed by either the active or the passive bird. In 
fact, when one bird employs it thus symbolically, the other 
usually responds by immediately repeating this symbolic use. 

(5) From useful symbolism to mere ritual is the last step—one 
that has taken place often enough in various human affairs. It 
appears that these actions and attitudes, once symbolic of certain 
states of mind and leading up to certain definite ends, lose their 
active symbolism and become ends in themselves. When I say 
that they lose their active symbolism, I mean that they are now 
not so much associated with readiness to pair as with the vague 
idea of pairing in general. Thus associated with pleasurable and 
exciting emotions, they may become the channels through which 
these emotions can express themselves, and so change from 
purposeful stimuli to further action into merely pleasurable self- 
exhausting processes (see below). It is at least hard to see how 
to explain such happenings as that described on p. 534, (c) 6, 
where first one bird and then the other goes into the passive 
position on the open water, after which there is simply a 
resumption of feeding or preening. 

Another general point worth noticing is this:—-In the case of 
this Grebe the male has even less possibility of enforcing his 
desires than the majority of birds. In a few birds the male is 
not so helpless. The ordinary Barndoor Cock, for instance, is 
often rather forcible in his methods. In the Wild Duck (Anas 
boschas L.) the drakes often kill the ducks by continued tread- 
ing*. Somewhat similar forcible pairing is recorded of the 
Mute Swan (Cygnus olor). In such species it is by no means 
necessary for the race that the act of pairing should be par- 
ticularly pleasant to the female. In most birds, however, the 
female has the upper hand: she can always prevent the cock 

* Huxley, Biol. Centralbl. 1912. 
Proc. Zoot. Soc.—1914, No. XXXVI. 36 


508 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


from pairing with her, by simply running or flying away 
(cf. the Redshank, Huxley, ’12,). In our Grebe we are a step 
further still: not only must the female (or the passive bird, if we 
want to be precise; but this is, for the present, complicating the 
issue unnecessarily) be willing to pair, but she must also take the 
first steps-—-must ascend a nest or platform and assume a special 
position—before the cock can think of pairing. Here, therefore, 
supposing that the functions of the sexes had not been almost 
equally distributed, it would have been necessary for the hen to 
have had a strong impulse towards pairing ; it might be that she 
was impelled directly by a violent physiological stimulus, or 
more indirectly by association, through the act being extremely 
pleasurable. 

The phylogenetic course of events is hard to disentangle; we 
might suppose it to have been somewhat as follows :— 

(1) Owing to the need of a firm support for pairing, it became 
necessary, as above set forth, for the female to take the initiative 
in the act of pairing, by assuming a special position. 

(2) The male had thus no means of expressing his readiness 
to pair [whereas in most monogamous birds it is the male, as 
one would expect, who takes the initiative: cf the Warblers 
(Howard, ’13), the Redshank (Huxley, ’12,), ete.]. 

(3) Meanwhile, quite independently, a process, or tendency — 
eall it what you will—had shown itself, by which the characters 
of one sex might be or tended to be transferred to the other, and 
vice versa. 

(4) This was seized upon by Selection (we cannot as yet speak 
less metaphorically) and employed to supply the present want ; 
the pairing attitude of the female was transferred to the male to 
give him, too, a means of expressing his readiness to pair—to 
enable him, should he wish it, as well as the hen, to take the first 
step towards the performance of the act of copulation by the pair. 

(5) As so often oceurs, the process did not stop precisely at 
the desired spot (we still speak in metaphors, for brevity’s sake) ; 
with the female pairing-attitude was transferred the female 
pairing-instinct, and so came about the complete or nearly 
complete facultative reversal of the pairing habits. ; 

This naturally does not pretend to be more than a possible 
scheme ; but it is worth while setting out such a scheme, merely 
. aa how this ‘reversal of the sexes” could have come 
about. 


(ii.) Courtship. 


T have started with the subject of coition, because the first 
thing I want to make clear about the courtship-actions is their 
total lack of connection with the act of pairing itself—a notable 
fact, in which the Grebe differs radically, of course, from many 
other birds, especially those in which the sexes differ in appear- 
ance, é.g. the Bustard or the Peacock, but also some in which the 
sexes look alike, e.g. the Redshank. 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE, 509 


In relation to this, no doubt, is the fact that pairing only takes 
place on the nest, and that the nest is hidden away among the 
reeds, while the courtship actions are, I believe, aly ays gone 
through out on the open water. This, i in itself, ‘would not be 
conclusive evidence of total separation of the two sets of actions, 
for the performance out in the open might be followed directly 
by a veturn to the reeds and subsequent pairing. But there are 
two further facts which make it conclusive. In the first place, 
one of the reservoirs at Tring is completely bare of reeds, and con- 
sequently of Grebes’ nests too. Itis, however, the richest in fish, 
and numbers of Grebes fly over to it from the other reservoirs 
every day, and at all hours of the day, to feed. Now, in spite of 
the absence of reeds, and so of nests, and so of the possibility of 
pairing, the birds interrupt their fishing, or sleeping, or preening, 
to go through the ritual of courtship just as often on this 
reservoir as on any of the others. ‘That is point number one. 

Point number two goes still further. 

I frequently kept individual pairs under observation for a 
considerable length of time, and then, if I watched long enough, 
always found that one set of courtship-activities would in point 
of fact be followed by a pretty long interval of resting or fishing, 
and that then this time spent in every-day affairs would be 
again succeeded by another series of courtship-actions—a proof 
that these actions are what we may call self-exrhausting and not 
excitatory. The best record, because the longest, was on this 
same reedless reservoir. J had one pair under observation for an 
hour and forty minutes (section 10, record 11). During that time 
they had six simple bouts of shaking, and also two prodigious 
long bouts, followed each time by the diving for weed and then 
the strange Penguin-dance. And between all these elaborate 
displays of sexual emotion, no sign (or possibility) of pairing— 
nothing but swimming, resting, preening, and feeding. 

I was thus—much against my preconceived ideas—driven to 
think of all the complicated postures and evolutions of courtship 
in the Grebes as being merely an expression of emotion. 

The particular form of expression used is no doubt determined 
—predetermined—by the arrangement and innervation of certain 
structures which the birds possess: but the impulse to use the 
muscles and nerves is an emotional one—during courtship there 
must be in the mind of the bird an excitement, a definite feeling 
of emotion. Let us, to satisfy the physiologists, try to put it m 
terms of nerve-currents. One member of a pair is continually 
seeing its mate at its side. This, in its present physiological con- 
dition, stimulates certain tracts of its brain, charging them up and 
up until they are in a state of considerable tension (mental accom- 
paniment:—state of diffused emotional excitement). Finally, 
the tension reaches the critical point, and a discharge follows. 
This discharge flows down hereditarily-determined paths, and 
actuates the muscles concerned in courtship (mental accom- 
paniment :—violent and special emotion, quickly dissipating 


36% 


510 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


itself with a sense of ‘“ something accomplished, something 
done.”) 

This merely indicates the possible material mechanism ; of the 
actual, we know next to nothing. However, by comparing the 
actions of the birds with our own in circumstances as similar as 

ossible, we can deduce the bird’s emotions with much more pro- 
bability of accuracy than we can possibly have about their nervous 
processes: that is to say, we can interpret the facts psychologi- 
cally better than we can physiologically. I shall therefore (with- 
out begging any questions whatever) interpret processes of cause 
and effect in terms of mind whenever it suits my purpose so to 
do—which, as I just said, will be more often than not. 

Let us take the parallel from human affairs. Far be it from 
me to go into the matter with a heavy hand; let us merely 
look at a few familiar facts in an unfamiliar biological light. 
The “courtship-actions” of man are mostly predetermined by 
heredity : any young couple that you like to take will be pretty 
certain to ‘express their emotion” by holding each other’s hands, 
by putting their arms round each other’s waists, or by kissing 
each other; and of this last action kissing on the mouth is the 
‘highest development.” Let us merely notice that these actions 
are not perhaps exactly parallel with what we find in the Grebe— 
that they are altogether more fluid, less fixed, and that they are 
sometimes less self-exhausting and more excitatory in character: 
on the whole, however, they are not very different. Moreover, 
in thei case we know a great deal about the accompanying 
emotions, either from our own experience or from what others 
tell us. ‘To take only the most specialized form of human court- 
ship-actions, the kiss; although we know that it may act as an 
excitant (¢f. Dante’s famous lines on Paola and Fra ncesca) yet the 
accompanying emotion is in itself quite special, different from all 
others, and the emotional process is usually something an wnd fiir 
sich, expressing itself in the action, and exhausting itself in the 
process with a feeling of inevitability. In the memory, however 
it, leaves its trace, and as it were desires to repeat itself, but 
only when the emotional tension shall again have risen (think of 
Plato’s epigram to Agathon: or the lovers in Richard Feyerel ; 
or Romeo and Juliet). That will suffice to show what I mean by 
a self-exhausting expression of emotion. Such a process would 
be one that to the doer of it feels at the time almost inevitable 
though he can only do it at certain moments. At other times. 
determined by his general mental state (cf. section 10, record 1), 
the action, however pleasant to recollection, is not “ spon- 
taneously” possible, and if performed is forced or at least not 
fully pleasurable. When normally executed, the action is accom- 
panied by violent and pleasurable emotion, which usually dies 
down, or changes, into a quite different feeling, one of satisfaction 
meanwhile leaving its mark in the memory. Its recollection 
then acts as a partial stimulus, so that next time it is a little 
more easily performed. 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 511 


This will, in the first place, show how difficult, and almost 
inevitably futile, it is to try and deal with the emotional essence 
of things by the methods of “ordinary biology”; I think, how- 
ever, that it will serve to explain what I mean by a self-exhaust- 
ing expression of emotion, and will give the point of view from 
which to look at the facts of the Grebe’s courtship: let us now go 
on to examine the facts themselves more systematically. I will 
take the different forms of courtship-action one by one, describe 
their usual occurrence and their relation to other actions, and 
then mention the most important variations or exceptions that I 
have seen. 

The various attitudes already described are combined into 
definite actions or ceremonies. 

(a) The simplest form of courtship-action is the bout of shaking, 
of which I have described a typical example. As already seen, 
shaking may take place either before or after other courtship- 
actions, but in perhaps the majority of cases it is not thus a link 
in a chain of processes, but a single self-originating and self- 
exhausting process. It varies acertain amount in intensity and in 
length, and also in the amount of habit-preening that takes place. 
Of this there may be none, or, towards the end of a bout, there 
may sometimes be more preens than shakes. The bouts seem, to 
the casual onlooker, to start themselves—in reality, I think, each 
bird excites the other. One gently shakes its head under the 
force of rising emotional tension; the other bird had not quite 
got to that stage, but the sight of its mate shaking acts as a 
stimulus, and it too pricks up its head a little and gives a shake. 
This reacts on the first bird, and so the excitement is mutually 
increased and the process fulfils itself—a very good example of 
“‘ crowd-psychology,” and also a good example of an epigenetic 
process *, 

There is one well-marked variation of this form of courtship 
which seems to denote a higher level of excitement ; it is especi- 
ally common when a third bird has intruded into the domestic 
harmony of the pair and has been driven off (section 5, iv.). 

Here the beaks are pointed somewhat downwards, the neck 
brought a little forward instead of vertical, the whole head 
brought forward and curved over, and the ruff erected more than 
usual (fig. 6). This attitude is almost always confined to the 
beginning of a bout, the birds sooner or later relapsing into the 
ordinary position. 

The bout of shaking is not only the commonest form of court- 
ship-action, but it also forms part of all the other more elaborate 
forms. It always ends the series of actions, and often begins 
them as well. It is as it were the foundation on which they are 
built, and was probably (if I may express a mere opinion) the 
earliest to appear in phylogeny. 

The other ceremonies of courtship are all formed by the 


* See also p. 544, where one bird won’t shake, and the other wants to. 


512 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


combination, in various arrangements, of the shaking-bout, the 
Dundreary, the Cat, the Ghost-dive, the weed-trick, and the 
Penguin-dance; in addition, they may be slightly modified by 
jealousy. ; 

They can be divided into two groups: (1) those in which the 
Cat-position plays a prominent part, and (2) those into which 
weed-carrying enters. Let us consider them in this order. 

The Cit-position forms a part of two quite distinct ceremonies, 
which, simply for the sake of ready reference, I shall cali the Cere- 
mony of Discovery and the Display. he first of these is gone 
through, as far as I can make out, when the two birds of a pair 
find and rejoin each other after being separated for some time. 
‘The second always occurs in the middle of a bout of shaking; on 
such occasions I presume that the shaking has not been ‘self- 
exhausting,’ but that the emotional excitement that accompanies 
it has reached a slightly higher level than usual, with the result 
that it overflows into a new nervous channel, and so expresses 
itself in this new way. 

(b) The Ceremony of Discovery.—A typical case has already 
been described (p. 497). I should interpret the facts thus :——The 
two birds of a pair have become separated—perhaps they have 
gone off fishing in different directions, or one has been on the 
nest and the other has not stayed near by. ‘They wish to rejoin 
each other. ‘l'o this end the bird that is searching puts itself into 
a special attitude, which is probably adapted for uttering the 
special ery only heard on such occasions, and cruises about, alter- 
nating its signal-calls with moments of looking about it. On 
hearing the call, several neighbouring birds will usually prick 
up their necks and look about them; but I believe that it is 
usually only the searehing bird’s true mate who takesany further 
interest (this would doubtless depend on the emotional state of the 
neighbouring birds), Once this discovery of the missing mate has 
been made, a special ceremony takes place to celebrate the event. 
This ceremony is a peculiar one, and is practically confined to these 
occasions of discovery ; very possibly the memory of the ceremony 
and its excitement adds to the eagerness felt by one bird of a pair 
to rejoin the other. The ceremony itself usually consists in 
this—the bird has been discovered dives, upon which the 
searcher puts itself into what I have called the Cat-attitude, a 
bizarre but beautiful position obviously recalling the elaborate 
displays of many other birds. In this attitude the searcher waits, 
almost always in a state of great excitement, as shown by its 
turning itself hither and thither, from side to side. Jt is stimu- 
lated to this excitement by the diving bird: first of all, as the 
dive is very shallow, the diver’s approach is marked by a swift 
vipple of the surface ; and then, when the diver at length appears, 
it 18 in a shape as unlike that of everyday life as is the “ Cat- 
position ” of the searcher—albeit the two are at opposite poles of 
the Grebe’s capabilities, Sometimes the diver emerges when only 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 513 


a few feet from the searcher. This is merely to reconnoitre his 
position ; head and neck alone appear, the crest not erected, and 
are swiftly withdrawn again, The final appearance takes place 
almost always beyond the searcher, and the bird emerges with its 
back to the other, facing it only as, revolving on its axis, it settles 
down. The performance always ends with a bout of shaking. 

Although in my “typical” cases the searcher has always been 
the female, yet the male may also search for his mate in the same 
way. I have watched an obvious cock in the regular Dundreary 
(search) attitude for a long time; only on this occasion no mate 
responded to the call. Further watching is necessary to see 
whether it is merely an accident that my searchers have usually 
been hens, or whether my observations represent reality. (It may 
possibly be connected with the fact that the hens seem to spend 
more time on the nest than the cocks; but this is mere con- 
jecture. ) 

(c) The Display Ceremony is quite different. The birds are 
already together, and the display is simply a form of excitement 
similar to the bouts of shaking. In typical cases the pair will be 
indulging in a bout of shaking; suddenly one of them flies off a 
few yards and puts itself into the full Cat-position, showing its 
circular ruff and white-striped wings to its mate. There is no 
diving, however, and, after some seconds’ display, the birds swim 
together and there is another bout of shaking; after this they 
simply swim off, or separate, or feed. Hither eock or hen may go 
‘into the Cat- attitude. In one ease the first bout of shaking ‘had 
been preceded by a “ flirtation” (p. 521) on the part of the cock. 

To show how one ceremony may blend into another, I adduce 
the following instance :—There was a regular Discovery Ceremony, 
the hen calling to the cock, but with this difference, that they 
swam together, shook, and the hen flapped off and went into the 
Cat-position, oral that only then did the cock remember, so to 
speak, to do the ghost-dive (p. 498). Another mixed “cer emony,” 
this time more closely related to pure display, is related on p. 547. 

(2) Finally comes the ceremony of the Penguin-dance. I have 
little to add to the description already given (p. AQ9): Wwice, 
curiously enough, a single pair was seen to perform the dance 
‘twice In a morning. This might imply that some special physio- 
logical state, pr obal ly of high excitement, was necessary for the 
act, ror I only saw it on two other occasions, and Selous only saw 
it once. 

The performance can only be gone through when both 
are equally excited; for instance, once (p. 547) after a bout of 
shaking the cock dived and fetched weed from the bottom. The 
hen, however, was not stimulated to do so too, and when he came 
up he found no answering stimulus, and so dropped the weed as 
he swam towards his mate. 

There is no reason for supposing even this elaborate ceremony 
to have any direct relation whatever with coition. It is a form 


5IL MR. J. §S. HUXLEY ON THE 


of excitement and enjoyment, seemingly as thrilling to the birds 
as it is to the watcher, but, like all the other courtship-actions, 
self-exhausting. 3 : 

Very interesting “‘incomplete stages In development of this 
ceremony were seen in one pair of birds, ranging from simple 
diving to the complete ceremony (see below). 


(e) Other Courtship Ceremonies. 


(1) Back-to-back Ceremony. 


There are considerable individual variations in the courtship- 
activities of the Grebe, and I have seen occurrences which may 
well be interpreted as rudiments of new ceremonies. In one pair, 
for instance (section 10, record 12), the birds almost always went 
into a formal back to back, or rather tail to tail, attitude after 
each bout of shaking. 


(2) Diving Ceremony. 
Other actions seem to stand in some relation to the more highly- 
developed ceremonies. For instance (pp. 545, 552), simple diving, 
either by one or both birds, without any fetching of weed from 


the bottom, is introduced as part of the courtship between the 
two bouts of shaking. 
(3) Weed-trick Ceremony. 

In still other cases, the weed-trick is gone through and is 
followed immediately by a bout of shaking. In both pairs in 
which this was seen, one bird alone brought weed, although in 
one pair (not in the other) both had previously dived. I am 
inclined to believe (but more observations are needed) that two 
(distinct ceremonies are here involved: first, the fetching and 
offering of weed by one bird, usually the cock, to its mate; and, 
secondly, a typically “mutual” ceremony involving simultaneous 
diving of both birds of a pair: and on to this latter the “ penguin 
dance” has been grafted. 

The offering of weed is strongly reminiscent of occurrences in 
the sex-differentiated, non-mutual courtships of other birds, such 
as the Warblers, where the cock often carries Jeaves or twigs 
in his mouth during sexual ecstasy (Howard). It seems to me 
probable that, since diving is necessary for weed-fetching, the one 
has come to be associated with the other, and the two ceremonies 
have come to be mixed up: in the extreme case on one side there 
is no mutual ceremony—only an offering of weed by one bird to the 
other; at the other extreme we have the complete penguin dance 
as described on p. 499, where both cock and hen bring up weed ; 
and as intermediates we have mutual diving (p. 552) and mutual 
diving where the cock alone brings up weed (p. 552, end). 

Taken all in all, the courtship is chiefly mutual and self- 
exhausting: the excitatory, secondary-sexual forms of courtship 
such as weed-offering or pure display serve not as excitants to 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 515 


coition, as in most birds, but as excitants to some further act of 
courtship ; and this is always a mutual and also a self-exhausting 
one. ‘The excitants to coition are of a very special nature, and 
are symbols, rather than mere general excitants. 


Habit-Preening. (See p. 497.) 


This is very frequent, occurring in about half the bouts of 
shaking seen. The more excitement, the less preening, seems to 
be the rule ; long bouts may sometimes degenerate into practi- 
cally undiluted preening, the head simply being brought more or 
less up, but not shaken, between the “ preens.” It is always the 
hind end of the wings, I believe, which is raised and let fall by 
the beak. 

In some way there must be a strong association between 
preening and head-shaking in the Grebe, for solitary birds who 
were really preening themselves I have several times seen raise 
their heads, slightly bristle their crests, and give a rudimentary 
shake. Why or how the association has taken place is more 
difficult to say. I certainly believe that the action I call habit- 
preening has been derived from true preening, and has been 
ceremonialized in the process of becoming part of a courtship- 
action. For the present we must leave it at that, 


‘© Habit-Shaking.” 

That for some reason there is a very real association between 
shaking and preening is shown by the following facts. When 
actively engaged in real preening of themselves, the birds are 
often seen to lift their heads, give a rudimentary shake or two 
(without erecting ears or ruff) and then go back to business. 
This is generally seen when the bird is engaged in preening its 
hinder parts. We have observed it in autumn as well as in 
spring, and so it presumably takes place the year round ; there is 
thus obviously a real association between the preening and the 
shaking, and the shaking is not a mere release of simpler sexual 
energy. 

This is exactly the converse of what I have called ‘habit- 
preening,” and may therefore appropriately be styled “ habit- 
shaking.” 

There is thus a single association with a two-fold result. How 
it can possibly have arisen, or what purpose it can serve, remains 
to me at present an absolute mystery. I leave it as a puzzle to 
future bird-watchers and comparative psychologists. 


Fighting between Cocks. 


I saw very little of this beyond mere hostile expression (p. 521). 
Once, however, I saw two birds actually grappling: one was 
struggling half-submerged, while the other was more or less on 
top of it, and had hold of the feathers of the back of its opponent’s 
head. After some considerable splashing and struggling, they 
separated and swam apart. 


516 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


In birds which pair up early and remain “ married” for the 
season, hike the Grebe, one would, of course, not expect to find any 
of the regular combats seen in other species. It would be inter- 
esting to see whether there is more fighting in February, during 
the actual process of pairing-up. 


The question must now be put—‘ What for?” What is the 
good of all these divings and posturings, these actions of courtship, 
these ‘‘expressions of emotion”? ‘lo what end are colours and 
structures developed solely to be used in them, and what return 
is got for the time and energy spent in carrying them out ? 
They are common to both sexes, and so have nothing to do with 
any form of true sexual selection; they are self-exhausting pro- 
cesses, not leading up to or connected with coition, and so cannot 
be sexual excitants in the ordinary sense of the term. 

It must be, however, that they fulfil some function; and I 
believe I know what this function is. I believe that the court- 
ship ceremonies serve to keep the two birds of a pair together, 
and to keep them constant to each other. 

The Great Crested Grebe is a species in which the two sexes 
play nearly equal parts in allactivities concerned with the family. 
The cock shares equally in nest-building, -nearly eyually in in- 
cubation and early care of the young (it is only later that the 
young pass into the care of a single parent, probably the female, 
see Pycraft,’11). Thus, from the point of view of the species, 
it is obviously of importance that there should be a form of 
“marriage ””—a constancy, at least for the season—between the 
members of a pair. ‘The same result—marriage—is observable in 
such a species as man; but in man the main cause is a division of 
labour between male and female, whereas in the Grebe the sexes 
have been made as similar as possible. It would seem that the 
Grebes’ family affairs had simply required more labour to be spent 
on them, and that Evolution had happened to go along the simple 
path of increasing the quantity of labour, by bringing the male 
in to do female’s work, instead of improving the quality by 
adopting the principle of specialization. 

Birds have obviously got to a pitch where their psychological 
states play an important part in their lives. Thus, if a method is 
to be devised for keeping two birds together, provision will have 
to be made for an interplay of consciousness or emotion between 
them. It would be biologically enough if they could both quite 
blindly, and separately, attend to the common object—nest, 
eggs, or young; but with brains like theirs there is bound to be 
_a considerable amount of mental action and reaction between 
them. All birds express their feelings partly by voice, and very 
largely by motions of neck, wings, and tail; and not only this, 
but the expression can be, and is, employed as a form of language. 
This being so, we have here a basis on which can be reared various 
emotional methods of keeping birds of a pair together. As 
always, selection of accidental variations has led to very diverse 
results ; so that we see this ‘‘ emotional companionship ” playing a 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 517 


art in many apparently very different actions of birds. Herring- 
Gulls sit or stand close beside each other for hours together, 
occasionally rousing themselves to a joint ceremony of shaking 
their necks. As the Snipe drums overhead, there is often a call 
fromthe marsh below. Many birds when paired are always calling 
to each other, and probably singing birds sing partly to their 
mate; Dabchicks have a special spring note, usually given as a 
duet. As a very simple case, I have seen a pair of Blue Tits 
very recently paired up who, although feeding, were perpetually 
ealling to each other and at frequent intervals coming close up 
side by side; it was perfectly obvious that they simply took 
pleasure in each other’s presence, like the engaged couple that 
they were. 

We have thus the following train of reasoning. Many birds 
must be kept in pairs during the breeding-season. ‘This may be 
partly effected by the instincts of the separate birds—the mstinct 
to build a nest, to sit on eggs, to feed young; and partly by 
sustincts which only can find play when the two birds are 
together. ‘These latter are often very emotional, and the court- 
ship habits of the Grebe afford a very specialized example of this 
emotional bond between members of a pair. 

1f my contention is correct, it is clear that many actions and 
structures solely used in courtship are of use to the species, and 
not only to one sex of the species; these therefore must be 
maintained by Natural as opposed to Sexual Selection, 


(iii.) Nest- building. 


I rely almost entirely on the observations of Selous (01, and 
see my Summary, section 8). 

Materials —Selous’ nest was made mainly of dark ribbony 
weed, fetched from the bottom. Some surface-weed was also 
used. Besides this, such objects as water-lily stalks and large 
water-logged sticks are occasionally employed, the latter seeming 
to help anchor the nest. To steady the nest still further, the 
weeds are often woven among the stems of growing water-plants. 
As with other birds, the materials vary with the situation. In 
Avundo-heds the nest is very largely made of bits of reed-stem, 
though always with some weed; while elsewhere no reed is used 
at all. 

Time, etc—The main bulk of the nest appears to be built very 
quickly—in a few hours, in fact. This main portion is always 
built in the early morning (as with many other birds), and while 
on one day there may be no nest to be seen, by the next it may 
be nearly completed. In this very active building both cock and 
hen often take part simultaneously; they work very hard, 
averaging between them more than two cargoes of weed every 
minute, and gomg on for half an hour or an hour at a time 
without stopping. 

After one nest has been built, another may be started (and 


518 MR. J. 8. HUXLEY ON THE 


nearly finished) next day at no great distance. In the case 
noted by Selous, during the building of each nest the cock 
built himself a platform or rudimentary nest close to the bank 
and not far from the nest that was in progress. In the con- 
struction of this the hen did not share. 


FUNCTIONS OF NEST. 


There seem to be at least three kinds of nests—the true 
nests, the pairing platforms, and the cock’s platforms. 


(1) The true nests are bulky structures, rising well out of the 
water. A single pair of birds may build more than one. In one 
of these the eggs are finally laid. It is not known whether a pair 
always build more than one (probably not), nor whether, if more 
than one is built, it is always the last that is chosen to receive 
the eggs. 


(2) The pairing platform (one seen by Selous and one by me) is 
a sodden, messy-looking structure, apparently much trodden 
down, and practically flush with the surface of the water. It 
seems to be used only as affording the necessary support for the 
action of pairing, and is apparently built some time before the 
true nest, e. g. Selous (01, p. 339 e¢ segg) watched a pair for 
three weeks and saw no nest except a single platform, which 
was used exclusively for pairing (and pairing actions). It is 
distinctly improbable (from the appearance of all true nests that 
I have examined) that such a platform would be built up and 
turned into a true nest, though no evidence on this point is 
forthcoming. 

What is certain, however, is that pairing need not always take 
place on such a platform, since Selous saw it occur ona true nest, 
and one which had probably one egg already in it. It appears to 
me likely that such platforms are built early in the season, when 
only copulation (or the preliminaries thereto), and not incubation, 
isin progress. Then, later, true nests are necessary to lay the 
eggs in, and once these are built copulation can take place in 
them just as well as on the platforms—. e. the platforms are only 
temporary expedients, rendered necessary by the birds’ pairing 
habits, and would thus phylogenetically appear to be degenerate 
nests. 


(3) The platforms of the cock. These, too, are imperfect 
structures, and are probably also degenerate nests. In the case 
observed by Selous they were built close to the bank by the cock 
alone, during the construction of a true nest close by. When 
built, they were used (by the cock alone) as resting-places where 
he sat or, more frequently, stood. 

Their true purpose is hard to see. It cannot be that the cock 
needs a resting-place more than the hen (unless—merely to state 
a case !—we suppose that in the month of May both sexes need 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 519 


to rest on some firm support more than at other times, and that 
the hen incubates more than the cock, so that he has to build 
himself an extra resting-place). Possibly such platforms have 
something to do with receiving the young after hatching, and 
are built precociously. But this is mere guesswork—further 
watching must reveal their secret.. Mr. Selous, in a letter to me, 
says he thinks now that the platform is due to an aberration of 
the nest-building instinct inthe male. From Selous’ own records, 
however, it is clear that the male certainly uses it to rest on. 


Differences in building of the different kinds of nest. 


The bulk of the true nest is built by both birds together in a 
very short time. After that, it seems to be casually added to 
during the time of incubation. his is useful, for the nest would 
otherwise get gradually pressed down into the water. It also 
tends to lose its slightly cupped form, and to remedy this the 
sitting bird may often be seen to pick bits of weed from the inside 
or the outside of the nest and lay them on the rim. 

The cargoes of weed brought during incubation are often very 
small compared with those brought during the first building of 
the nest, and the whole action seems often to have rather the 
stamp of a habit about it—“ I am going to the nest, so perhaps 
I had better bring a weed or two along.” 

During the main building, one bird sometimes sits on the nest 
fer a short time ; during this period one bird might also lie along 
the nest in the passive pairing position, as an invitation to the 
other to pair. But apparently pairing and pairing-actions are 
gone through more often when the bulk of the nest is finished, 
or when a platform alone exists—nest-construction thus ap- 
pearing to use up most of the emotional energy of the birds. 

The cock’s platform.—It would be interesting to know if this is 
always made during the construction of the main nest, or if 
sometimes the cock set about it in cold blood, before or after the 
true nest was finished. It is quite possible that the cock and 
the hen stimulate each other to active nest-building as they do to 
courtship activities (p. 511), and that while they are in this 
excited state, and only then, some of the nest-building energy is, 
in the cock, diverted to his platform. 

The pairing platform.—This (only one recorded case) was 
already built when Selous first noticed it. Only small pieces of 
weed were added to it, and usually “in a very perfunctory 
manner” (Selous, 01, p. 342). After one bird had unsuccess- 
fully invited the other to pair, it often ‘‘manipulated the weeds 
a little with its bill” before coming off the platform. 

We thus badly want to know about the building of the pairing 
platform; and also whether, during its construction, the cock 
builds a platform for himself, as he does during the building of 
the true nest. 


Or 
i) 
oO 


MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


Share of the sexes in nest-building, 


The only data are based on the actions of a single pair—that 
observed by Selous in 1900; we must not, therefore, generalize 
too far. However, certain things emerge clearly. Both sexes 
work vigorously at the nest. During nest-building, the cock 
builds a platform by and for himself not far from the nest, In 
this particular pair the cock seemed slightly more active in nest- 
building, though the hen was more skilful. This may be, and 
probably is, merely an individual trait. As far as the building 
of the true nest goes, both sexes seem to be at least as similar as 
they are, for example, in appearance and in courtship habits. 
‘The mysterious platforms of the cock remain as one of the few 
truly secondary sexual characters of the species. 


Psychology. 


It seems probable that the same sort of psychological mechanism 
holds here as in courtship. Fetching weeds from the bottom and 
piling them in a heap is an instinctive act affording pleasure or 
relief. Although it is much easier to Imagine a bird deriving 
pleasure from solitary nest-building than from solitary courtship 
action, yet here, too, it seems as if the cock and hen are mutually 
stimulated to activity. This is, at all events, an eminently useful 
trait, for it ensures that the nest shall be quickly built, that 
the pair shall keep together, that they shall build one nest at 
a time (instead of two, perhaps widely separated ones), and so 
forth. 

That it is pleasurable may be further inferred from the fact 
that when the fever is upon them the birds may build two large 
nests in two successive days (Selous, loc. cit). This may seem 
wasteful, but here, as in so much else, Nature indulges in a 
considerable reserve—better too much than too little. This is 
the case with reserves of food, our own appetites, the number of 
times which most animals pair, the number of unpaired males 
in polygamous species and in Bees, etc., ete. Here, perhaps, the 
reserve is indirect rather than direct; it may not even be any 
advantage to have built two nests instead of one, but it may well 
be an advantage to have such a strong nest-building instinct that 
two or more nests happen to result, instead of one. 

Finally, again, as in the courtship, association plays its part. 
What has once been done with pleasure, is done again easily as a 
habit. So when a bird is near the finished nest. and especially 
when the birds are there together, weeds are often added, but 
almost always in a more or less perfunctory way. 

Why, after one bird has unsuccessfully invited its mate to pair 
on the platform, it should often dive and bring weed to the plat- 
form, I donot fully see. We can only say that diving and weed 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 521 


are connected by separate and perhaps roundabout mental paths 
with nest-building, courtship, and pairing; and that what we 
know is only an outline of the birds’ behaviour. 


(iv.) Relations of different pairs to each other. 
(Fuller details are given in Part J5)) 


The Great Crested Grebe, as we have already seen, pairs up very 
early in the season. What is the relation of the pairs of birds 
to one another ¢ 

Asa general rule, the two birds of a pair seem to take very 
little notice of the rest of their species. Oceasionally, however, 
there is some contact. There may be jealousy on the part of one 
bird, and this jealousy may, in any particular case, be merely 
precautionary, or actually justified by flirtatious behaviour on the 
part. of the other bird of the pair; or there may be hostility 
between members of one pair and members of another. 

Simple hostility is the rarer of the two: the only reason I can 
discover for it is the trespassing of one or both birds of a strange 
pair upon the * territory ” of another (p. 558). In its symptoms 
there is nothing very remarkable: the birds go into the threaten- 
ing Dundreary-attitude, often “barking” angrily at each other ; 
finally, one may fly or dive at the other and drive it away, but 
often the very mild form of hostility involved in staying quite 
still, assuming the threatening attitude, and barking at the 
enemy (who is also doing the same) is all that happens. 

Tt is much more interesting, however, to find in these birds 
what we had best call flirtation, aS an accompaniment to their 
monogamy. The whole thing is very human : when one member 
of the pair is rather excited and the other is either lethargic or 
far away, there 1s no channel for the relief of its excitement. If 
a bird of opposite sex is in the neighbourhood, however, this 
would provide the desired relief, and the result is that the 
“temptation ” is often too strong, and a bout of shaking ensues 
between two birds who are not mated. J have never actually 
seen such flirtations go beyond a bout of shaking; there is no 
yeagon that they should not, except that, as far as I could see, 
the birds did not seem to be used to each other, so to speak, 

Zand so their excitement often cooled down very quickiy. 

Tf the rightful mate sees what is going on, it is always 
roused to action, however lethargic it may have been before. 
Tt drives the odd bird away (often by a subaqueous attack with 
the beak) and then almost always has a strong pout of shaking 
with its mate. Thus all the anger of jealousy 1s directed against 
the usurper, not against the mate—which again 1s distinctly 
human! ‘The “erring spouse "is always equally ready to shake 
with his mate as with the tertium quid—and often more so. 

Here, again, the sexes are qualitatively alike—either will take 


522 MB. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


the initiative in flirtation, although from my records the cock 
seems to do so rather oftener than the hen. 

Where there is a simple pleasurable ceremony, for whose 
performance two birds are necessary, it would seem quite natural 
that flirtation would occur. If the ceremony is an advantageous 
one, flirtation represents an overshooting of the mark by Natural 
Selection—a slight disharmony. ‘‘ Adultery” I would think very 
improbable in this species, since the act of pairing is connected 
with a nest, built jointly by the pair, in a definite spot of their 
own territory. 


(v.) Other Activities. 
Incubation. 


It appears that both sexes sit, but that probably the hen sits for 
a much longer time. Mr. A.'T. A. Ritchie informs me that when 
there is a punt near the nest and the hen does not want to return 
to the eggs, the cock will often drive her to her duties. 


Care of the Young. 


After the young birds are hatched, both parents attend on 
them for some time; but later in the season, when the young are 
half-grown, the observations of Mr. W. P. Pycraft (Pyeraft, °11) 
make it certain that only a single bird, probably the hen, looks 
after the brood. 

Thus here there is no complete and qualitative division between 
the sexes, except in this last particular. 

There is, however, rather more of a quantitative division than 
usual. 


6. Discussion. 


There are various considerable difficulties concerned with the 
courtship-structures and actions of the Great Crested Grebe. 
In the first place, it is clear, from what has been said, that in this 
bird there is no sexual selection in the ordinary sense of the 
word ; the crest and the courtship-actions are almost identically 
developed in cock and hen alike. 

On the other hand, the crest is only fully developed in the 
breeding-season, thus resembling true secondary sexual characters; 
and, as I have pointed out (Huxley, ’12,) it is used only in 
courtship, so that if not “secondary,” it is at least “sexual.” 
Further, the crest is smaller (though but slightly) in the 
female than in the male, a fact which it is, at first sight, simplest 
to explain by assuming that the crest was acquired by the cock 
as a secondary sexual character, and has now been almost com- 
pletely transferred to the hen (cf. similar transference, complete 
or incomplete, in Lycenid and other butterflies (Weismann), 
Reindeer, mammz of mammals, colours of many birds). We 
will revert to this point. 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE, 523 


The courtship actions, however, can scarcely be explained by 
transference. ‘The Penguin-dance, for instance, can never have 
been anything but a joint ceremony, equally shared by both sexes. 
Furthermore, even in the Dabchick, although it (and it alone in 
the subfamily) lacks all courtship-structures on the head, there is 
a joint courtship-action—the two birds come face to face, stretch 
up their necks, and emit the well-known cry. This being so, it 
is fairly clear that the ancestral courtship-actions of the Grebes 
were not in the nature of a display by one sex, but were joint 
actions of the pair. ‘There is nothing especially remarkable in 
this. The display-courtships are, on the whole, more striking, 
and so have been more frequently described ; but (to draw on my 
own limited experience) Razorbills.and Herring-Gulls have very 
well-marked joint courtship-actions, although the actions are 
associated with no special structures whatever, and Selous has 
described other such actions in Swans, Divers, Guillemots, 
Fulmars, and other species. 

I should put forward the theory that the courtship-habits of 
birds are based upon at least two totally different foundations : 
in the first place the actions gone through by males alone, appa- 
rently as the direct result of sexual eagerness (solitary actions), 
and, in the second place. the actions gone through by male and 
female together, and perhaps often (though by no means always) 
connected or associated with nest-building (combined actions). 
Primitively in neither case would there be any special structure 
or colour associated with the action. For solitary actions this is 
well seen in the dowdy Warblers, so fully described by Eliot 
Howard; here the cocks resemble the hens, but go through 
elaborate droopings of wings and fannings of tail, with bristlings 
-of feathers on throat and crown. Later, Sexual Selection has 
stepped in, and naturally enough has taken what was already 
given, and added to it. The same instinctively-displayed parts— 
wings and tail, throat and crown—are the parts which are 
especially singled out for the development, first of special colours 
(Finches, Woodpeckers), then of special colours and structures 
combined (Turkey, Argus Pheasant, Blackcock, etc.). In com- 
bined actions a similar process has been gone through. In the 
Herring-Gull and Razorbill we have the instinctive actions pure 
and simple—a direct outcome of nervous excitement. Then, 
again, something has stepped in and used what was thus provided, 
and we get combined actions displaying colour (coloured mouths 
of Fulmar Petrels, Selous), and finally colour and structure, as in 
the Grebe. The members of the Heron tribe in general, and the 
Egrets in particular, have also ornamental structures common 
to both sexes; it would be very interesting to know the course 
of courtship in these birds. Pycraft (13) figures a mutual dis- 
play executed by the Kagu. 

The question now arises, How have such colours and structures 
arisen? By Sexual Selection followed by transference, or by 

Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. XXX VII. 37 


524 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE > 


some other process? Such other process can easily be imagined, 
and I feel confident that it has played a considerable part. We 
may call it Double or, better, Mutual Sexual Selection (Mutual 
Selection for short). Where combined courtship-actions exist, 
and a variation in the direction of bright colour or strange 
structure occurred, it would make the actions more exciting and 
enjoyable, and those birds which showed the new variation best 
would pair up first and peg out their “territories” for nesting 
before the others could get mates. The level would tend to be 
raised generation by generation. Mutual Selection is in a way 
a blend between Sexual and Natural Selection. The structures 
and actions arising under it have their immediate origin in the 
preferences of individual birds, not in anything outside the 
species, and in their immediate function they are entirely confined 
to the courtship. On the other hand, the mutual courtship 
itself, the activities of both birds taken together, may be of use 
to the species as a whole, in keeping the sexes together when 
necessary. ‘Then the indirect function of all the shaking-bouts 
and displays of the Grebe is a function of use to the species, and 
besides the direct origin there is added an indirect origin under 
the pressure of Natural Selection. 

Mutual Selection has a certain similarity with assortative 
mating, but is by no means the same thing. Like true Sexual 
Selection, it encourages an ever higher level in the development 
of a character, once variation has given it a basis to start from. 
In the Grebe the line of variation encouraged by Mutual Selection 
has been the tendency to produce ruffs and tufts of feathers on 
the head, and to go through actions involving, besides the use of 
these structures, diving and sporting with water-weed. 

The question in the Grebe is complicated, as noted above, by 
the slightly less developed crest of the hen ; this, however, might 
easily be accounted for by differences in the metabolism of cock 
and hen. The Discovery and (especially) the Display Ceremonies 
are also rather stumbling-blocks in the way of an explanation by 
Mutual Selection ; they seem so very like the Displays of solitary 
courtship. However, even here the second bird plays a part, 
which in the Discovery Ceremony is at least as important as that 
of the displaying birds. 

What is quite clear, however, is that, even supposing (what 
to me personally appears very doubtful) that ordinary Sexual 
Selection has “produced” the structures and the cat-position 
(we must know more about the habits of other species of the 
genus to decide this), yet it has gone hand-in-hand with a 
process of Mutual Sexual Selection as regards the majority of the 
actions. These actions (like the display of the Peacock, but 
unlike that of the Warblers) are much too elaborate and much 
too specialized to be considered as the immediate outcome of any 
form of physiological excitement. They obviously have a long 
and complicated evolution behind them, and, as they can only 


525 


On 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE, 


be performed by the two birds together, there is nothing to 
account for them as they now stand but some such process as I 
have just sketched under the name of Mutual Selection 

Then there comes the question of the facultative reversal of the 
act of pairing (or, possibly, only of preliminary pairing-attitudes). 
The other cases noted by Selous (Pigeon and Moorhen) differ in 
that the male crouched to the female directly after the act 
of pairing, who at once proceeded to play the male’s part. In 
the Grebe there was always a long interval before the ‘“ reversal 
of instinct ” took place. 

In all, however, it is very difficult to see how to account for it, 
except on the assumption that there has been a reciprocal 
“transference” of pairing-instincts. This transference may be 
apparent or real. It is apparent if we believe that the units for 
such sexual characters are equally present in the germ-plasm of 
both sexes, and that the chavacters themselves do not appear in 
the other sex (or only appear as rudiments) asa result of the 
great primary sex-difference. 

If the transference is real, then one must assume that the 
zygotic constitution of the two sexes is different in regard to 
secondary as well as primary differences, but that there is a 
constant tendency—depending on some as yet unknown process— 
to transfer such characters to the opposite sex. (Hybridization 
experiments, where the female of a species can transmit to her 
male hybrid offspring the secondary sexual characters of her own 
species, indicate that the first method isthe true one.) How else 
than in one of these two ways can we explain transference in 
both directions? This is seen, for example, in man, where a male 
organ, the moustache, appears rudimentarily in the female, and 
female organs, the mamme, appear rudimentarily in the male: 
in abnormal cases, besides, the transference may be complete, the 
organs being completely developed in the wrong sex. Such 
moustached women and men with breasts again support the idea 
that the transference is not a real transference, but consists in 
the removal of an inhibition only. 

(L would not trouble to mention the theory that these appear- 
ances of characters of one sex in the other are due to descent 
from a hermaphrodite ancestor, were it not actually the case 
that Metchnikoff has advanced it. It is enough to point out that 
if this were so, the primitive mammal must have been a herma- 
phro lite.) 

To us it makes little odds whether there is inhibition alone or 
transference followed by inhibition. In both cases the character 
will be in antagonism with the inhibitor: supposing that there 
is no longer any need to inhibit a character of one sex in the 
other, then on Darwinian and Weismannian principles the in- 
hibiting “force” will atrophy, and the character, remaining 
as strong as ever, will appear equally in both sexes. 

Apply this to the present case. Birds are for the most part 

Bi 


526 MR, J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


so constructed that impregnation would take place equally well 
whether the sexes are in normal or reversed position : that is to 
say, there is no necessity for keeping to the customary position— 
and accordingly “reciprocal transference” of the pairing atti- 
tudes (whether the transference be apparent or real) may, and 
quite probably will, take place. If so, then in one of our Grebes 
the instincts and reflexes for the pairing-actions proper to its 
sex co-exist side by side with those for the pairing-actions proper 
to the other sex. It is also obvious, first, that both cannot be 
gratified simultaneously ; and, secondly, that these two very 
different sets of actions must be associated with two very different 
sets of emotional states. The bird may ‘“‘feel female” or it may 
“feel male,” and according to its feelings, so will it tend to act. 
But, as we saw before, in discussing the pairing-attitudes, it 
appears that, owing to the difficulty of coition in the Grebe, the 
“female” (passive) pairing-attitude has become a mere symbol 
of readiness to pair. Thus Natural Selection has come in to 
assist the slow process of transference (at any rate, so far as 
pairing-attitudes are concerned), and since whatever involves 
them will probably involve coition itself as well, we have an 
additional reason for believing that actual reversal of pairing 
does take place, as Selous supposes, in the Grebe. 

At any rate, there can be no doubt about the reversal in the 
Pigeon and Moorhen. The sudden reversal that here takes place 
is rather different, but may be explained somewhat as follows :— 
Here, too, both active and passive instincts are now represented 
in either sex. A bird is ina state of sexual excitement ; this 
excitement releases itself in the performance of, say, the male part 
in the act of pairing. The excitement is not always completely 
exhausted by the act, and, if so, the act is repeated (just as the 
shaking-bouts of the Grebes are continued for a longer or shorter 
time, according to the degree of what we may call courtship- 
excitement). But supposing that general sexual excitement 
arouses both the male and female emotional states, then the per- 
formance of the act once in the male attitude will only exhaust 
the feeling of ‘male excitement,” leaving the ‘female feeling ” 
still a-tingle. The result will be, first, an inducement to repeat 
the act and, secondly, an inducement to repeat it with attitudes 
reversed. 

Thus such immediate reversal is more or less an accident of 
heredity, while the Grebe’s reversal is an accident aided by the 
usefulness of the transferred actions, which thus bring the acci- 
dent within the sway of Natural Selection, 

This treatment of the question is of necessity sadly speculative, 
but it is our duty at least to try to construct a coherent mechanism 
of theory to explain the isolated facts of observation. 

Finally, a word as to terminology. J have already pointed out 
(Huxley, ’12,) that the phrase secondary sexual cannot be applied 
to the Grebes’ ruff and ears or to their courtship-actions, because 


COURTSHIP OF 'THE GREAT CRESPED GREBE, 527 


this term always implies a difference between the two sexes, and 
yet the crest of the Grebe has a sort of secondary sexual look 
about it—unreflectingly, one would at once write it down as 
such. This is due to our incomplete classification. We begin 
by separating out sexual characters from all others—these being 
characters that are different in the two sexes. We divide them 
into primary, accessory, and secondary. The mammee of mammals 
(with the exception of man) have nothing to do with courtship 
or mating, yet they are usually included under the same heading 
as the tail of the Peacock, while the Grebes’ courtship-structures 
would be left out in the cold. 

Besides the mere criterion of difference in the two sexes, we 
must have some other criterion—a criterion of use. 

It is naturally impossible to draw up any completed classifi- 
cation that will satisfy every case. To do so would be beyond 
the powers even of a Herbert Spencer—and not of much use when 
done. 

It is enough to point out, first, that our group of Secondary 
Sexual Characters is a bit of an omniwm gatherum. Some of 
them, as the mimicry of the female Papilio, or the brown colour 
of the female Pheasant, are protective, of use to the individual 
and to her offspring. Others, such as the mammee of mammals, 
are of use only to the offspring; others, like the sexual differ- 
ences in the beak of the Huia, where male and female hunt in 
couples, one splitting open the wood, the other picking out the 
hidden grubs, have arisen by a division of labour, and are of use 
to the couple as a couple. One might go on, but it would be 
unprofitable. 

In the second place, we must recognize as a fact that the 
existence of individuals of separate sexes with wills of their own 
has led to the development of what we call courtship—simply a 
process in which a series of actions is carried out as the outcome 
of an emotional state based on sexual excitement. All courtship 
is based on sexual excitement, and characters connected with 
courtship merit a separate name of their own. This name lies 
ready to hand in Poulton’s term epigamic; we must, however, 
remember that the literal meaning of the term must not be 
pressed, for in many cases the courtship ceremonies do not lead, 
directly or indirectly, to the act of pairing. Let us rather turn 
it the other way about, and, defining an epigamic character as one 
that is used in courtship, go on to define courtship as a series of 
actions based immediately or remotely upon sexual excitement, 
and, to make ourselves clear, we must add that sexual excitement 
is not merely sexual desire, but that whole emotional state into 
which a member of one sex may be thrown by a member of 
the other. The necessity for the distinction is obvious, if 
we think of the conditions in Man. Sexual excitement, of 
course, includes mere sexual desire, and also includes the fighting 
of males among each other as a result of sexual desire. 


528 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


~ Tf we want a tabular statement, we can draw up something 
like the following * :—. 


(A) Characters different in the two sexes. 
(Sexual characters). 


(1) Primary. Of the gametes and gonads. 
(2) Accessory. Concerned with the union of the gametes. 
[Copulatory organs, pairing attitudes, 
sexual desire. | 
(3) Secondary. All others. 
(a) Developed through Natural Selection. 
(Huia beak; mamme; marsupium ; 
incubation by @ alone in birds, &e. } 
(b) Capable of being developed through Sexual > Epigamic. 


Selection. | (Courtship characters, i.e. all 

[Horns of deer; tail of Peacock, &e. | characters concerned with 

(B) Characters similar in the two sexes. r the selations of the sexes, 

(1) Capable of being developed through Mutual | excepting those connected 
Selection. immediately with coition.) 


[Grebes’ conrtship and crest ; Herring- 
Gull’s courtship, &c. } 
(2) All other characters. 


It might perhaps be better, as has been suggested to me, to 
restrict the term Secondary Sexual to 3b, and employ Sex-limited 
where I have employed secondary sexual. For one thing, how- 
ever, this would conflict with Darwinian use; also, I am at 
present more concerned to show the necessity for new thinking 
than for new terminology, which will be more suitable in a more 
general and definitive paper. 

IT will conclude by hoping that anyone who has the oppor- 
tunity will observe the habits of the Crested Grebe during the 
time of pairing-up in early spring; the full courtship of the 
Dabchick would also be of very great interest. In the near 
future, I hope to publish a more general paper upon Mutual 
Selection, so that any notes sent to me on this subject will be 
gratefully received and acknowledged. 


For some further discussion, I refer the reader to the Postscript 
(p. 559). 


PART II. 


7. Locatiry, Mrtuops, Erc. 


Through the kindness of the Hon. Walter Rothschild, I was 
given a permit to watch, and a punt to watch from, at the Tring 
Reservoirs. These consist of four large sheets of water in the 
eastern corner of Hertfordshire. Two have dense beds of reeds 


* Simple sexual desire, if we adopt this scheme, we may call an accessory sexual 
emotion. Sexual excitement includes this, and all the epigamic sexual emotions as 
well. Pairing attitudes are accessory sexual attitudes. Let it, by the way, never 
be forgotten that emotions and attitudes are just as much characters as are colours 
or structures. 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 529 


(chiefly Arundo phragmites) along one shore, affording cover for 
the nests of the Grebes, while the banks of the other two are 
bare. One of these latter is, however, very rich in fish, and a 
number of Grebes come over every day to feed on it. There, 
of course, they are nowhere near their nests, and this is of some 
importance in connection with the meaning of their courtship- 
actions. 

As there were thirty pairs or more on the water, I was never 
at a loss for “material.” In fact, it was often very hard for my 
pencil to keep up with the birds’ actions. 

Some of the watching was done concealed in the boathouses, 
and some from a screened punt, but the major part from the 
bank. This is in many ways the most useful. With ‘good 
instruments * (in this case Goerz-Trieder binoculars x12 and a 
telescope x30) every action can be easily followed, the birds 
are not seared, the field of view is uninterrupted, and it is far 
easier to follow the actions of the same pair of birds for a long 
period of time. 

This, as I say, is best for discovering the general course of 
events; but just as the microscopist must for certain details 
supplement his low-power lens with an immersion objective, 
so here, watching at close quarters must be adopted in order 
to work out the exact meaning of each separate bit of behaviour. 
Only when the general course of events has been roughly traced 
and some hypothesis, however vague, framed concerning it in 
the watcher’s mind, can the fine shades of behaviour have any 
meaning for him. It is impossible to notice or record everything, 
and only when some general idea has been gained can the value 
of any fact be properly appreciated. It is on this account that 
IT would say, always begin by distant watching; otherwise you 
will not be able to see the wood for the trees. 

My brother, Mr. N. T. Huxley, spent much time watching, 
and several of the incidents here recorded are from his notes. 
His help was most valuable, and I wish to acknowledge it here. 
To Mr. James Street, Head Keeper at the Tring Reservoirs, I 
am indebted for much information, and for his help in arranging 
hiding-places, ete. 


8. ABSTRACT OF SELOUS’S WoRK. 


T venture to append a short abstract which I had to make of 
Selous’s diary notes for my own use, in hopes that others may find 
it useful too. 


* A simple apparatus, which makes the task of simultaneous note-taking and 
observation very much easier, may be constructed as follows :—On to a folding 
camera tripod is screwed a ball-and-socket camera-holder (special telescope-holders 
can, I believe, be purchased) ; the field-glasses are clamped, by means of a long 
screw and nut, between two leather-lined pieces of wood, and the lower piece of 
wood can be screwed on to the platform of the ball-and-socket. Both for stationary 
and moving objects the fatigue of observation is enormously lessened hy this means ; 
in addition, one or both hands are left free, and so notes can be taken while 
watching—a necessity, almost, for reliable work. 


330 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


The place of observation was a single large sheet of water. 
In 1900 he watched, fairly continuously, from April 27th to 
May 25th, except for a break of nine days (May 8th to 17th). 
At first there was but a single pair of Grebes. A nest was built, 
probably shortly before May 3rd. On May 3rd the birds paired 
(or attempted to pair) on the nest. A single egg was laid by 
May 38rd, a second before May 8th; then came a gap, and on 
the 17th the nest was destroyed bya boy. There was nowa third 
bird, an odd male, on the lake. The hen ‘‘flirted” with him, but 
the “right” cock drove him away: and, although he stayed till 
the 22nd, he apparently remained alone and disconsolate all the 
time. In a single day (May 20th) the pair built a good portion 
of a second nest. This they continued to build during the 21st, 
the cock meanwhile building (by himself) a rudimentary nest or 
platform close to the bank. On the 22nd they were building 
another (third) nest in the reeds, the cock again building a 
(second) platform by the bank. On the 23rd there was an 
unsuccessful, and later a successful, attempt at pairing on the 
nest. On the 28th the nest seemed abandoned ; however, when 
Selous returned, towards the end of July, there were two nearly 
full-grown young. 

In 1901 he watched for a good part of April, then nearly 
continuously from April 22nd to May 14th, and then off and 
on till nearly the end of May. There was again a single pair 
on the water, and he believes these to have been the same birds 
as were there the year before. Before he started watching 
they had made a kind of nest, but a very poor one—a mere 
sodden heap of weeds scarcely showing above the surface and 
not at first sight to be easily distinguished from the growing 
weeds about it. ‘This appears to have been only a pairing- 
platform. On the 25th they paired on this platform. On 
May 2nd they executed a regular weed-trick and Penguin-dance, 
and, some time afterwards, paired again on the platform. As 
time went on they grew less and less interesting, and it finally 
grew clear that they were not going to lay. On June 12th, 
when Selous visited the place after a fortnight’s absence, there 
was no sign of the birds—they had gone for good. 

That is the bald diary ; now for the birds’ behaviour. Under 
different headings I will summarize the actions of the ‘1900 
pair,” and the ‘1901 pair.” (In passing, be it remarked that 
Selous has no proof that the birds he saw in 1901 were really 
the same as those of 1900. He says:—“‘ As they were the one 
and only pair on the same sheet of water, and as the nest was 
in approximately the same place, I assume and feel personally 
quite certain that they were.” However, there are certain 
definite differences in behaviour in 1900 and 1901, which make 
it at least possible that they were not the same pair.) 


Nest-building. 


(2) 1900.—Both birds may help in building the nest, usually 
diving to fetch weeds from the bottom, but sometimes gathering 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE, Ns) 


them from the surface. The mass of weeds brought up by the 
bird may be very large—a good deal larger than the bird’s head, 
indeed, with streamers trailing beyond the tail. One bird 
(usually the male) might bring weed to the nest while the 
other was incubating; when this was so, the sitting bird would 
generally arrange the weeds with its beak, though sometimes 
both would arrange the weed together. Weed was added to the 
nest for at least five days after the first egg was laid. 

In the building of the second nest, he saw one morning the 
cock build a few minutes alone; then both cock and hen build 
together very hard for about forty-five minutes (74 cargoes in 
forty minutes); then the hen build a little by herself. The cock, 
meanwhile, after a short rest, began building a platform, acting 
precisely as when building the true nest. After fetching 28 cargoes 
he stopped and rested. The next morning the same great activity 
was visible; but now the birds were building a third (true) nest. 
In fifty minutes (including a'pause) they brought 100 cargoes of 
weed, the last 10 or so being brought by the cock alone. This 
time the cock did not at first desert the nest altogether in favour 
of his platform, but every now and then diverted a cargo of weed 
to his own private platform-use. After a rest, however, he 
reversed his former behaviour; he now began working syste- 
matically at the platform, but occasionally took a cargo to the 
nest. Sometimes he seemed to hesitate between the nest and 
the platform. The next day there was a little more building, 
mainly by the cock, and after this no more records. 

As to the part played in nest-building by cock and hen 
respectively, Selous says in regard to this pair :—‘‘ The interest 
taken by the male in the nest has been very marked throughout, 
more so even—in appearance, at any rate—than that of the 
female, though in the actual building of it she has been yet 
more efficient than he” (/.c. p. 179). Although he never carried 
quite so large a cargo as the hen sometimes did, yet his average 
was as good as hers, and when he swam with his burden to the 
nest he went much faster. 

Sometimes the cock would pass his cargo of weeds to the hen, 
who (if she did not drop it) would put it on the nest. He never 
saw this action reversed, nor did he even see the heu help in the 
building of the cock’s platform, or building one for herself alone. 
The hen alone brought large sticks to the nest (however, the cock 
was seen to bring a stick to his platform). 

In the only recorded case where a nest was watched during 
incubation (Selous, J. c. pp. 161-170), the cock alone brought 
weeds to the nest, though the hen might arrange what he 
brought. This is probably of no importance. (The bulk of the 
nest was presumably built beforehand by both birds together.) 

(6) 1901.—This year the only “nest” seen by Selous seems to 
have been a mere pairing-platform, the actual building of which 
was not observed. Occasionally the birds would add-to it, but 
in a very perfunctory-looking way, and never more than a few 
bits of weed at a time, 


532 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


Courtship- Actions. 


Selous observed numerous bouts of shaking, which he refers to 
in various ways: ¢.g., ‘They front each other in the water, and, 
with their snaky necks reared up, ¢dter a little with the beak, or 
make little tosses of their heads in the air” (loc. cit. p. 341). 
He has not, however, attended accurately to the positions of ruff 
and ears. All that can be said is that his pair (or two pairs) 
of birds certainly went through the ceremony of shaking, and 
apparently in just the same way as the many pairs seen by me. 
As far as I can judge (though judging is difficult) they did not 
shake quite so often. The important thing to notice, however, 
is that they did shake, even when they were quite alone on the 
water. That either jealousy or choice of mates should be the 
immediate cause, or purpose, of the action is thus absolutely 
excluded. 

On p. 457 he says:—‘‘They front each other with reared necks 
in the way often alluded to; then, without tdter-ing, each throws 
up the head several times into the air, at the same time opening 
and closing the long, slender bill.” He obviously considers this 
as being different from the usual ceremony, and adds that he 
has seen the same action several times, though less pronounced. 
I think it probable, if not certain, that his eye was here simply 
caught by a somewhat more pronounced shake than usual, the 
process referred to as tdéer-ing being then what I should call a 
bout of languid shaking; but in the absence of further details 
one cannot be sure. 

A possible but rather rudimentary display ceremony is perhaps 
indicated on Selous’s p. 340:—‘Once, too, the male flies suddenly 
some way off over the water.” 

Then on p. 343 is described a very fine weed-trick and Penguin- 
dance. It started with a bout of shaking; then the hen dived 
and came up with a small piece of weed which she apparently 
dropped. Just before or just after the hen came up (probably 
before, to judge from my experience), the cock dived too, and 
brought up a large bunch of weed. They came face to face, 
and “all at once both leaped entirely upright in the water.” 
The hen took hold of the dangling end of the weed which the 
cock was carrying, and then they “chasséd,” “with little waddling 
steps” from side to side (in the case seen by me, the birds rotated 
slightly back and fro on their axis and did not actually move 
from side to side. I think Selous is mistaken: such an action 
as he describes would be impossible on open water). Finally 
they sank down again, the weed was dropped, and “the male sets 
off, full of intention, to the nest on the opposite shore.” After 
some time the act of pairing was gone through. This is im- 
portant as showing that this elaborate courtship-action may 
sometimes lead more or less directly to pairing, i.e. may act 
(more or less) as an excitant. 

Finally, I must just refer to two more scenes. (1) (p. 163) :— 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 533 


*¢ When just in front of each other one dives and brings up some 
weed, which they both discuss in the friendliest manner, pulling 
it about, and perhaps eating a little.” (2) (p. 340) :—‘ Once one 
of them—I think the male—comes up with something in his bill, 
which he dabbles about on the surface and seems to sport with, 
the other coming close up and appearing to take an interest.” 
This something Selous thinks was a bunch of weed. These 
actions may bear some relation to the weed-trick, and at all 
events, even if the main purpose was feeding, the common par- 
ticipation of the two birds denotes that some sexual flavour 
attached to the act. More light is needed on the habit. (It is, 
perhaps, connected with the arranging of the weeds on the nest 
by both birds together, as described on Selous’s p. 162.) 


Relations of the pair with other birds of the same species. 


For some days a solitary male appeared on the water where 
the single pair was living. The hen of the pair apparently * 
indulged in a little flirtation with the odd cock—a bout of 
shaking. This roused the jealousy of the rightful husband, who 
approached in the usual threatening ‘ Dundreary ” attitude, and 
dived to attack the third bird from below the surface, repeating 
the diving attack a second time. Later the rightful couple were 
together and apparently bore. down purposefully upon the odd 
male. The hen rested, while the cock drove his rival away 
by the attacking dive, and then returned, to go through an 
“excited” bout of shaking with his mate; first, however, “he 
swims about for a little, with the head still lowered, and in a 
proud sort of way.” 

Thus, as far as jealousy is concerned, Selous’s observations are 
in agreement with mine. 


Pairing-Actions. 


The most important of Selous’s observations are concerned 
with nest-building and pairing; indeed, the full sequence of the 
pairing-actions seems to have been witnessed by his eyes alone. 
I have already given a general account of his observations and 
the deductions to be drawn from them. Here I have simply 
tabulated some of his detailed descriptions. 


1900. 
(a) One bird on the nest. 


(1) May 3rd. The hen was on the nest; the cock swam up and 
attempted to pair. There is no record of the hen previously 
“going” into the passive position, but as this was at the 
very beginning of Selous’s observations, he may well not 
have grasped its significance. 


* T say apparently, for Selous is not quite certain as to the birds’ identity, This 
description, however, agrees excellently with my observations. 


534 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


(2) May 3rd. After this attempt the hen continued to sit ; the 
cock returned at intervals, and at one of his returns Selous 
noticed the hen assume the passive position. (Here there is 
again, perhaps, an error of omission. See the next entry.) 

(3) May 4th. The hen was sitting; the cock approached at least 
seven times, and at each approach the hen went into the 
passive position. In these last two cases (2 and 3) the cock 
paid no particular attention to the hen, save for the mere 
fact of his approaching the nest. 


(b) Both birds close to the nest. 


(4) May 21st. The birds were resting after having built most of 
a second true nest; they then began building again, and 
after about a quarter of an hour the hen jumped up on to 
the nest and assumed the passive position. The cock made 
no response. She soon came off, and the building went on. 

(5) May 22nd. Almost exactly the same scene as (4) on the 
previous day. 


(c) Both birds approach the nest together from a distance. 

(6) May 23rd. (Not recorded which bird led the way.) The 
hen assumed the passive attitude on the water; when she 
stopped the cock did the same, but remained in the attitude 
longer. 

(7) May 23rd. After (6) there was a pause of about forty 
minutes, during some of which the cock (alone) added to 
the nest; he then ascended the nest and assumed the 
passive attitude. The hen came up several times, and each | 
time acted as if about to leap up into the active attitude. 
Meanwhile the cock rose once or twice and then sank down 
again into the passive attitude. Finally he gave it up and 
took to the water. 

(8) May 23rd. After (7) there was a pause of a few minutes, 
during which the birds separated and went quite far afield. 
Then the hen ascended the nest and assumed the passive 
attitude. The cock came up, behaved just as the hen had 
done before (in 7), but finally leaped up, and there was an 
attempt to pair. 


[I have put (6), (7) and (8) together because each one seems 
to lead up to the next. If we were to separate them strictly, 
(7) should be under heading (b), for the birds remained fairly 
close to the nest all the time between (6) and (7). | 


(9) May 23rd. Nearly an hour later. This has been already 
described (p. 503). The hen incited the cock by lying along 
the water ; the cock responded by also going into the passive 
attitude ; the hen ascended the nest and assumed the passive 
attitude, and the cock then attempted to pair. 


Thus, in 1900, the three actual attempts at pairing were made 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 535 


by the cock. Of the “ incitations to pair” (when one bird goes 
into the passive attitude), seven were made by the hen and one 
by the cock. In the case of this one, the cock ascended the nest 
directly ; as to the hen, on two occasions she was already on the 
nest, on three she ascended the nest directly, and on two she 
assumed the attitude on the open water. 


1901. (Only a pairing-platform available.) 


(a) One bird sitting. (No instances, because the birds apparently 
do not sit on the pairing-platform.) 


(b) Both birds near the platform. No record. (There are two 
doubtful records where he first notices the birds already at 
the bed of weeds where the platform is, but here probably 
he had simply not noticed their previous approach.) 


(c) Both birds approach the platform together from a distance. 
(Fifteen records, counting the two doubtful ones.) 


(i.) One bird swims straight to the platform, ascends, and 
assumes the passive attitude. 


This was seen ten times ; once it was done by the hen, the 
other nine times by the cock. 


(ii.) One bird assumes the passive attitude on the water near 
the platform. 


This was observed five times; twice it was the female, once the 
male, and twice the sex was doubtful. (Here, therefore, there 
is not the preponderance of incitations by the male that was 
seen in (i.)). 

On April 25th the hen assumed the passive attitude, and 
nothing further happened (immediately). 

On May 11th the hen went into the passive attitude, upon 
which the cock followed suit by going into the attitude too. 
Some time afterwards the scene was repeated, but with the parts 
played by the sexes reversed (cf. 1900 (6) & (9), above). 

This passive attitude, adopted successively by both birds on 
the water, might or might not lead to one of them ascending 
the platform and there assuming the passive attitude. 

Very often an incitation might have no immediate result, 
but after a short pause further pairing-actions might be gone 
through. I will quote a couple of Selous’s records for whole 
mornings. 


April 25th. 


(a) (There have already been several approaches to the neigh- 
bourhood of the nest, and several bouts of shaking.) 
The hen goes into the passive attitude near the nest ; 
but there is no result, and both swim away. 

(3) “* Very soon afterwards” they return, and the cock goes 
straight to the platform, where he assumes the passive 


536 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


attitude. The hen very shortly jumps up, and pairing 
takes place. 

(y) A little later they again approach the platform, and the 
cock again goes into the passive attitude upon it. 
The hen, however, takes no notice, and the cock 
comes off. 

(8) He follows her, they both turn, and he repeats his 
previous action—again without result. He then comes 
off, and fetching a piece of weed, lays it on the nest. 
The female comes up, and they lay a few bits of weed 
on the nest together, but very perfunctorily. 


May \\th. 


(a) Not long after a bout of shaking, they swim together to 
the weeds. The hen assumes the passive attitude on 
the water. The cock approaches, “‘ appearing interested” 
(cf. p. 501), but suddenly turns round and also assumes 
the passive position (but not so pronouncedly), in such 
a way that the two are tail to tail. Both then rise 
up, the cock presses past the hen, and goes into the 
passive position on the nest. The hen makes but a 
slight response, and the cock, after adding a piece of 
weed to the nest, swims off in company with his mate. 

(8) After less than half an hour they swim towards the 
platform, the cock leading. The cock goes into the 
passive attitude, and is imitated by the hen when she 
arrives. There is, however, no further result, and 
the pair swim off in company. 

(y) After about forty minutes they again swim towards the 
platform; the cock is far ahead, and on reaching 
the platform he ascends it and assumes the passive 
attitude. On this, however, the hen apparently 
becomes coy, for she suddenly turns and swims off; 
but when the cock follows her, she turns and swims 
eagerly to him—a pretty piece of psychology. 


With this I have summarised the most important of Selous’s 
facts. Others will be found under the separate headings. 


9. FURTHER DETAILS REGARDING THE RELATIONS OF THE SEXES. 
(i.) Shaking. 


The typical bout of shaking is of ten or a dozen shakes, the 
crest erected in a definite way, the necks stretched straight up to 
their fullest extent, the two birds facing each other at a distance 
of a few inches only. 

It is usually initiated by the birds swimming towards each other 
at a moderate pace, meanwhile gradually raising their crests and 
necks, and giving a repeated double call rather resembling that 
up-and-down call of the Snipe as he sits in the marsh. i 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 537 


At the beginning of a bout the attitude often seems to express an 
extra degree of excitement, but especially so after a “flirtation”; 
the ruff is a little more circular, the ears pressed forward to their 
limit, and the neck curved over a little at the top, so that the 
heads and beaks are pointing somewhat downwards; this attitude 
never lasts long, and soon subsides into the ordinary one, in 
which the birds give somewhat the alert impression of a couple 
of smooth-haired Fox-terriers. Asa general rule, habit-preening 
does not begin until after a few shakes, and usually gets a little 
more frequent as the bout goes on. 

Usually, the bout is closed by the two birds simply drifting 
slowly apart, and gradually lowering their crests, or else one or 
both of them may turn sharp up into the wind with a more 
sudden closure of the crest. 

In the longest bout seen the pair gave 84 shakes, while in the 
shortest seen (which is also the shortest possible) each bird only 
gave a single shake. 

Often there are somewhat abortive bouts, without enthusiasm 
on the part of either bird; these do not last long, never for more 
than seven or eight shakes, and the crests and necks are often 
not erected to their proper position. There are degrees of excite- 
ment. In the lowest the neck is in the graceful curve of the 
ordinary swimming position, the ruff is relaxed, and the ears are 
searcely half-raised. In the next stage, the ears are fully raised : 
then, the ruffs are slightly expanded as well: then, the neck is 
raised more and more: and finally both ruff and neck come to 
their typical extension. 

A certain frame of mind is necessary for shaking, and some- 
times even the expressed desire of the other bird to shake cannot 
arouse this state (see p. 544); for still further details the reader 
is referred to section 10. 


(ii.) Nest building. 


There is one curious habit connected with nest-building about 
the significance of which I am not at all sure: this is the tram- 
pling down of the nest. Lying in a punt in the reeds I have 
heard this trampling, first on one side, then on the other— 
squelch, squelch, squelch,—sounds of some creature trampling 
heavily with alternate feet on something sodden. 

This is the water-birds treading down their nests. The Grebe 
does it, and, I believe, the Coot, and possibly other birds as well. 
The one occasion where I saw it well is worth recording, partly 
on this account and partly for another reason, as will shortly be 
seen. A pair had been fishing and resting; the cock then stayed 
perfectly still, not very far from the nest, for some minutes, and 
the hen went off and fished. The cock moved slowly towards 
the nest, and was there joined by the hen; after a short time 
the hen got on to the nest, there, in the usual ungainly upright 
position, stamped heavily twelve or fourteen times on the sodden 
weeds, and then settled down into a sitting position She 


538 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


remained thus for about two minutes, then got off, apparently 
put a few bits of weed on the nest, and swam “off with the cock, 
who for his part had remained quite quiet all the time. When 
I went to inspect the nest later in the day, I found that there 
were no eggs, and that it seemed to be a mere pairing-platform— 
old, sodden, low, and covered with excreta. 

This is thus the only case on record where a bird has ascended 
the pairing-platform or nest except for the purpose of incubation 
or to go into the passive pairing-attitude. 

The cock of course uses his special platform to rest on, so it is 
possible that the pairing-platform is used by the hen as a corre- 
sponding resting-place. Or, in amplification of what I have 
already suggested (p. 518), that when the true nest is built the hen 
incubates longer and so uses that as a resting-place, the cock has 
his platform, and both sexes use the pairing-platform. 

A third possibility (but not a very likely one) is that the 
sitting on the nest (platform ) in this case was in reality only 
the first step towards assuming the passive attitude, but that the 
bird’s sexual excitement was not high enough to ‘complete the 
action. 

Most probably this, like many other bits of behaviour, was an 
“accidental” and useless release of ener ey, rendered possible by 
the mechanism of the bird’s mind. 

(iii.) Details of the Relations of Different Pairs 
to each other. 


I have thought it worth while to go into this at some length, 
in order to show how extremely complicated the birds’ mental 
states are, and how like may at a moment’s notice be turned into 
dislike. We will consider the relations of a pair with an odd 
bird in the neighbourhood. 

Let us for brevity’s sake call the three birds X, Y, and “ Y.” 
“VY” is the intruder, whom we also call the odd bird; X and Y 
are the pair, or the paired birds, cock and hen; Y is of the same 
sex as “ Y,” X of the opposite sex. This will serve when we 
want general formule. In particular cases, where the sexes 
have been accurately observed, we can employ a similar formula, 
eg. 6, 9,“9, or 6, 9, “6d,” according as the odd bird is a 
cock or hen; or we can simply say “Y”=“ 3” or “9” asithe 
case may be. 

Now for our general statements :— 


1, The disposition of X towards ““ Y” may be (a) well-disposed 
—in other words, X may be at the moment flirtatiously 
inclined in general. 

(6) Indifferent. Then X does nothing in particular, and Y 
drives “ Y” away. 
(c) Hostile. Then X helps Y drive “ Y” away ; 
but the actual initiative, the first step towards a “flirtation,” 
may be taken (1.) by X, (i1.) by ‘“ Y.” 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 539 


2. The disposition of Y towards “ Y”; this is always more or 
less hostile, but there are variations (w) in the time at which the 
hostility is first shown, and (4) in the way in which it is shown. 


(a) Time. Y becomes hostile 


(i.) on passing near ‘‘Y,” although “‘Y” has been quite 
inactive ; 
(ii.) on passing near “ Y,” but only after ‘‘ Y ” has first gone 
into the hostile Dundreary attitude ; 
(111.) only when X (its mate) makes as if to approach “ Y” ; 
(iv.) only when its mate actually begins to shake with ** Y” ; 
(v.) only after its mate has shaken for some time with “ Y.” 


(b) Method. 


Y may (i.) simply swim at “Y”; 
(i1.) assume the hostile attitude and swim towards “ Y” ; 
(i11.) fly at ‘“ Y” along the surface of the water ; 
(iv.) dive and endeavour to come at ‘‘ Y” with the beak 
from below the surface. 


In addition, these actions may be gone through in succession ; 
if so, they are always gone through in this order, except that (iii.) 
and (iv.) may be reversed. ; 


3. The disposition of ‘‘ Y.” 


““Y” may be (a) simply indifferent to the presence of the pair ; 
(6) hostile to the pair ; 
(c) eager to “ flirt” with X. 


Here again the initiative may be taken (i.) by X, (ii.) by ‘“ Y.” 


Combinations of these pretty well exhaust the possibilities ; 
here I shall give an idea of the most usual happenings. 

When the two birds of a pair are swimming along together, 
and they pass close to a third bird, X usually takes no notice, 
and Y goes into the Dundreary attitude while passing “ Y,” 
sometimes swimming a little towards ‘“Y.” The odd bird, “ Y,” 
may be, and usually is, entirely indifferent to the pair, though it 
may adopt a threatening (Dundreary) attitude as a response to 
the similar threat of Y; and I once saw ‘“* Y” take the initiative 
in threatening. 

On the other hand, I have never seen any sign of a flirtation 
between X and the odd bird in these circumstances. 

That X should be willing or desirous to flirt with “ Y,” it 
seems necessary that its mate should either be absent or fairly 
distant, or, if close at hand, lethargic (see section 10, record 1), or 
unwilling to perform any courtship-actions. When a. flirtation 
does ensue, “ Y” may have taken the initiative, by swimming 
close up, calling, or going into the searching Dundreary attitude ; 
or X may have taken the initiative by swimming up te a 


Proc. Zoot. Soc.—1914, No, XX XVIII, 38 


54O MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


perfectly innocent “Y.” The former, from my records, seems to be 
more usual (as one would expect: it is more probable that a lone 
bird will be more eager to “shake” than one whose mate is near 
at hand). 

One interesting fact emerges from table A (p. 542): in seven 
out of eight cases where there was a flirtation and I could be sure 
of the sexes, “ Y” was a female, while of the cases where X was 
indifferent or hostile to “ Y,” ““ Y” was female in about half the 
number. 

This is probably not merely chance; I believe that here the 
male Grebe possesses a little more of the normal characteristics 
of males. 

I have several records where “ Y” is very threatening from 
the first; here the pair always seem to make common cause 
against the intruder. I do not see how these cases can have 
anything to do with a desire of “ Y” to shake, ete., nor is there in 
the behaviour of the pair any sign of jealousy. ‘There seems to 
be only hostility, and [am disposed to think that in all such 
eases the pair has been trespassing on another's territory 
(see p. 558). 

Y may drive “ Y” right off, or content itself with going into 
the threatening attitude. ‘“Y” is always driven off if Y sees a 
flirtation going on; but when the pair are simply swimming past 
the odd bird, Y contents itself with going into the threatening 
attitude (in one doubtful case only was “ Y” driven away) ; 
here we have association at work. In cases where “ Y” hangs 
about, it may be driven off by Y even though no flirtation takes 

lace. 

If Y wishes to drive “ Y” off, it usually dives. Sometimes 
““Y” is completely taken by surprise, and, as it flies off, its place 
is at once taken by the jealous one. Presumably Y’s beak 
sometimes actually comes into play, which must be very. un- 
pleasant for ‘“Y.” At other times “‘ Y” sees Y dive, and is off 
at once. 

The mere presence of an odd bird is not sufficient stimulus to 
induce a bout of shaking between the pair. Shaking is usual 
(though not invariable) after a flirtation and subsequent driving 
away of ‘ Y.” 

When a bout of shaking does take place after flirtation, it 
always seems to begin in the forward position. This position 
in its full development I have never seen except after an odd 
bird has been driven away, so that we have here an interesting 
example of a definite form of courtship-action used exclusively 
under the influence of jealousy. 

Let us close with one or two interesting cases—actual hap- 
penings. Here is one:— 

1. The cock of a pair, saw an odd bird (? sex) near by, and 
drove it off, by flying at it, spluttering along the water. He 
then came back towards his mate, and from his attitude I thought 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 541 


he was going to shake with her. However, he then saw another 
odd bird (¢ sex) not far off, and, his pecker presumably being up, 
went off and drove it away too. After this he came back, and 
a short but vigorous bout of shaking ensued. I do not suppose 
he would have driven the second bird off if he had not been roused 
by the first. 

2. Then a second:—An odd cock was seen ‘in a very threat- 
ening attitude,” some twenty yards away from a pair. They got 
close together, the cock going into a fairly good threatening 
attitude: they then swam, the cock leading, towards the intruder, 
but suddenly turned tail; however, they soon faced round again, 
and waited a bit. ‘ Y” was now only about ten yards off. ‘Then 
the pair swam a little away (this is very odd) and then all three 
dived ; asa result, ““Y” was driven a short distance away, and 
the pair made as if to shake, but did not. “ Y” approached 
again, and the same scene was re-enacted almost identically (most 
ludicrous to watch, it was !); finally came several long dives on 
the part of all three birds, and “ Y” was driven right off. Strange 
to say, no shaking followed. 

Here, in face of an obviously hostile third bird, the pair 
united at once in common action (cf. Selous, in the case of Ring- 
Dotterel). 

3. Once I saw the odd bird approach “like a dolphin ”—pro- 
gressing for the most part subaqueously, but now and then lifting 
first head and then back out of the water, only to disappear 
again. What this may mean I do not know. 

4, In one case where there had been a flirtatious shake (‘ Y ” 
= 2), the rightful hen came up, and instead of at once driving 
“Y” away, started shaking, so that for a short time there was a 
parti a trois. She then drove “ Y” off, and then returned and 
had a long shake with X. This I have only seen once. 

5. Once where “ Y” (a hen) had called, X swam almost up to 
her, but at the last moment was seized with a ‘fit of repentance,” 
returned to his mate, and shook with her. Perhaps it was not 
repentance at all; perhaps on seeing her mate go off towards 
“Y,”’ the hen gave some sign that she was ready to shake, or 
rather that she was roused enough to shake. This would be all 
the cock wanted, and, seeing this, he came back. This is only a 
possible explanation, but it at least has its parallels in our own 
affairs. 

6. A variation on the above was given by the same cock a little 
earlier; this time he had actually shaken a bit with ““ Y”, but on 
seeing his mate approaching, he suddenly turned on “Y” and 
drove her off. The rightful hen did not trouble herself further ; 
but there was, curiously enough, no shaking on the part of the 
pair. 

7. An odd bird approached; Y (? sex) swam towards it. Both 
went into the threatening attitude and remained perfectly 
motionless, looking very fierce at each other at a distance of only 


38* 


542, MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


five or six feet, calling (‘‘ barking”) the while. - At length Y 
came up with a loud trumpet call, there was a great flying of all 
three, “ Y” was driven off, and the pai had a short bout of 
shaking. 

This is something like 2—hostility evinced from the start by 
“VY,” the pair acting together against the intruder, 

8. I only once saw two pairs come into conflict; and un- 
fortunately could not make out much. There was much diving, 
and, finally, two birds went off together; the other two had a 
short bout of shaking. 

Finally come the two cases where apparently two “odd birds” 
meet. 

9. In one I saw a short bout of shaking. Then the cock went 
off in the search (Dundreary) attitude; the hen, though quite 
close, took no notice, and the cock finally went right off. I am 
almost sure it was this same hen who later shook with another 
cock. 

10. Jn the other (p. 546), a cock came flying over, settled near 
a hen, and they had a short bout of shaking. Then the cock dived ; 
the hen still kept her ruff up expectantly, but the cock came up a 
long way off, swimming away from her, and she put it down ; 
and so the scene ended. 

In both these cases it is pretty clear that the birds were not a 
pair, but that, finding themselves together, they tried a bout of 
shaking. This, however, was somehow not satisfactory—it was 
not what they were accustomed to; and they parted. Both 
times one bird (as it happened, the male) was obviously searching 
for his mate, and it may be that this “ prepossession’’ led to the 
flirtation being quickly broken off. 


(RABEE AL 


Disposition of X to “ Y.” 


AS Les = Ey 
Sex of SiYer 
| lie = erase a H 
3 2 P 
| (@) X flirtatiously disposed to “Y” .........-........ sy ie 
(OD) PPXGindifterentytopVacu se oe 4 | 3 2 
(Oxo rostilertow ayy et Ue a iS) Ste ik ila we 1 | 2 2 


* In two of the seven cases, X (3) later became hostile to “Y” when his own 
mate approached, and in a third case he was almost entirely indifferent to “ Y.” 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE, 543 


TasLe B. 


Disposition of ‘‘ Y ” to the pair. 


Ficures in brackets include doubtful possibilities. 


| 


_A,—X and Y (the pair) swimming together in a | 
definite direction. 


SexOh saver 


(a) “Y” (the odd bird) threatening : 


(Ge) ee acenba kesh taentni tiativicmea sy eameseeeeeeece = | 
(ii.) ““ Y” does not take the initiative 
(Qe NE HAN CTEHODISS Hrgtoppaoceadbnes rosa onusecHnecesea|| 


(c) “Y indifferent ...... 


| B.—X and Y fishing, resting, ete.—not swimming. 


| 
| 


vice to any future observers. 


(a) “Y” threatening : 


(G5) erantalkespulelimibiaytivieneessceerreerte- eer | 


(ii.) ‘““ Y” does not take the initiative ....,.... 


(ii.) Doubtful 
(b) oy flurtatious 8 


(Go) peeveretakeshihepmniibiatiyer spear eee ae 
(u.) “ Y” does not take the initiative 
(it, Domo cacccooce 

(c) “¥ ” indifferent ...... 


Sk Caen 
1 
1 | 
1 5 | 
1 (2) 0) | 
loay| 
Day Ps l1@) 
2 | 
1(2)| 2 )1@2) | 
2 bea 


10. Recorps rrom my Notes. 


Here follow a number of actual incidents which may be of ser- 
Among other things, they show 


very clearly the individual differences between different pairs. 


I have numbered these scenes, and append here a little index 


showing where descriptions of various courtship activities may be 
found :— 


Courtship-action. 


Scene. 


Bout of shaking 
Display ceremony ...... seinen te ceas a 
Discovery ceremony 
Diving alone 
Weed-trick 
Complete Penguin-dance ............ are 
Flirtation 


Cr i i i a i ii aca 
ee ee ee 
ee eC i a ie id 
weer etree ores 


Hostility to birds of other pairs 


per oee! 


Lo 
joel 
Or 


Ome ams 
a 


~ 


2 


~ 


ay 
~ 


bs 
— 
Or 


[xis Ja 
| 
ware} 
Or 


~ 


Dayo wwe pe 
— ee bh bd © 


— 


~~ 


jA44 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


1. April 10. 4.8—4.40 p.m. 


A pair, ¢ and Q easily distinguishable. 

When I first saw them they were indulging in a typical shake 
of moderate length, ended by one turning away from the other. 
After this for about 17 minutes they moved slowly in one direc- 
tion, the hen always leading the way. When not swimming she 
did some fairly vigorous preening. Sometimes she was 30 or 40 
yards ahead of her mate, but malic she got as far away as this, 
she always swam back and joined the ‘cock. (Pleasure merely 
in each other’s presence, and dislike of being separated, 1 
marked in many monogamous birds.) He spent most of ae 
time with his head under his wing, but now and then woke 
up, looked about him, and gave some rapid strokes towards 
the hen ; occasionally he did a ‘Tittle preening. Not only was the 
hen more active and awake than the cock; she was also more 
emotionally inclined. She kept on coming close up to him and 
shaking her head slightly, trying obviously to stimulate him to 
respond. The first time she did this (4. 13) the cock just raised 
his head from under his wing, gave a couple of scarcely-visible 
shakes, without extending his neck, and relapsed into somnolence ; 
while to her later advances he responded not at all. She was 
very restless ; would swim up, give two or three shakes, swim a 
few yards off, turn, come back, swim off again, and so on, maybe 
three or four times in quick succession, then she would make up 
her mind and swim steadily off, only to come back again after a 
few minutes’ interval. This she did four times. By 4.26, after 
17 minutes of this, she began to think of feeding, for she dived 
twice. Her previous emotional state had, however, not quite 
died down, for she then came back right up to the cock, though 
this time without any actual shaking. At 4.32 she went right 
off, and began fishing a good eighty yards away. At 4.35 she 
caught a big fish, swallowed it, and went on diving. The cock 
meanwhile rested and preened himself, and at 4.40 I lost sight 
of both. 

This well illustrates the way in which the physiological and 
emotional states of individual birds vary from hour to hour. 
That the male was capable of normal excitement is shown by his 
shaking in the usual way at 4.8. This exhausted his emotional 
fires fos the time being, but left the hen still with a good deal of 
pent- up excitement. It seems (as one would expect) to be “no 
fun” to shake all by oneself, and so her potential energy had to 
be released through other channels, giving as a result the quarter 
of an hour’s restlessness. 

At 4.43 a bird which is recorded as “ 3, probably the same as 
that lost sight of at 4.40,” went into the regular Cat-position, 
and its mate appeared in the usual way, rising erect closely from 
below the surface. (Discovery Ceremony.) If they were the 
same pair, it is obvious that the half-hour’s rest had restored to 
the cock all his emotional energy, and the variation in emotional 
states is still more clearly brought out. 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREB®. = FAD 


2. April11. 1.50—2.30 p.m. 


A pair: ¢ and Q rather hard to distinguish. 

1.50. I just saw the end of a shake. 

1.51-2.0. They swam about vaguely, occasionally diving. 

2.1. I was watching one (sex ?) when suddenly the other came 
into the field of view, carrying in its beak a big bunch 
(bigger a good deal than its own head) of dark, ribbony 
weed, which must have just been fetched from the bottom. 
The bird was swimming fast and rather low, in the ordinary 
position adopted when approaching its mate with weeds. It 
came right up to its mate, and the pair shook (without 
habit-preening) for 10 seconds or so. Then (I am practically, 
but not absolutely, sure) the weedless bird took some of the 
weed, and shaking began again. This lasted a still shorter 
time—“ then ” (I quote from my notes) “ both birds turned 
head to wind—and lo, their ruffs were down, and there was 
no weed in their mouths!” They then swam off together. 

2.3-2.10. Lost to sight behind reeds. 

2.11. Out again. They turned to face each other, and then 
shook five or six times. To start with, strange to say, their 
necks were right down in the normal swimming position. 
As they shook, they gradually raised them till they were 
half pear-shaped. They then stayed motionless for about 
20 seconds, then shook twice, and swam slowly apart. 

2.12-2.27. For fifteen minutes, as near as may be, they did 
absolutely nothing—merely drifting and swimming aimlessly 
about. 

2.27. One preened itself ; and then they faced each other, shook 
7 or 8 times, turned up wind, and swam off into the reeds. 


3. April1ll. 5 p.m. 


I caught a pair in the middle of a bout of shaking. There 
were 7 or 8 shakes, with an occasional habit-preen, and then they 
swam apart, but with their necks still straight up and crests 
erected. One stayed nearly stationary; when the other had got 
some fifteen yards away, the stationary one dived. It came up 
close to the other, and shaking began again, much as before. 
After seven shakes they stopped and went off together, only 
gradually letting necks and crests subside to their ordinary 
positions. It must have then been feeding-time, for they took 
three long dives across to ‘‘ Fish Corner” and began fishing. 

This scene is unusual, for diving as a part of courtship-ritual 
is usually associated either with the cat-position or with the 
weed-fetching. The slow subsidence of neck and crest after 
shaking is also not common. 


4. April12. 8.20a.m. A pair. 


After drifting about for 5 minutes or so, they began shaking. 
They shook 10 or 12 times, with habit-preening; they then put 


546 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


their ruffs down, and drifted slowly apart. When they were 
separated by about twenty yards the cock dived and came up 
close to the hen, upon which the pair began shaking once more. 
After a very few shakes they stopped, the cock put his crest down 
and swam off at a moderate pace ; the hen, however, stayed where 
she was and kept her crest up. When the male was about forty 
yards off, he went into the cat-position: on looking at the hen, 
I saw that she had done the same, with wings fairly well arched. 
The cock had at first scarcely arched his wings. but when the hen 
went into position, up went his wings to the full for an instant. 
It was but an instant, for then he dived; ‘‘a ripple was seen 
coming quickly towards the hen along the surface of the water 
(most exciting!)”; when it had nearly reached her, the 
cock appeared, slowly erecting himself out of the water in the 
usual way. He seemed to be facing her all the time. He 
settled down, and a very long shake began. There was no 
habit-preening for the first ten or a dozen shakes, nor very much 
at any time. Eventually they drifted apart, put their ruffs 
down, and did nothing in particular for the five minutes or so 
1 went on watching. 

This shows again that courtship-diving may take place apart 
from the cat-position or from weed-fetching ; and also that, 
although the cat-position seems usually to be employed as a 
stimulus to induce a bird of the opposite sex to do the Penguin- 
dive, yet the diving bird, too, may go into the same attitude 
before it dives. 


5. April 12. 8.50 a.m. 


A cock flew over from another reservoir and alighted near a 
hen. In under a quarter of a minute they had begun 
shaking. They only shook seven or eight times, with habit- 
preening, and then drifted apart. Soon the cock dived; the hen 
kept her ruff up, but the cock had dived away from her, and 
appeared a long way off. On seeing this, the hen lowered her 
crest. 

This seems to show that when one bird dives, and dives deep 
so as to produce no ripple on the surface, the other is left in a 
state of suspense which is exciting enough to make it keep its 
crest up. : 

Whether the two birds were a paired couple or not could 
only have been proved by further watching; but I should say 
that they probably were not a pair, but that their close 
proximity and the absence of their real mates excited them. The 
emotion found expression in the usual actions, but then the 
strangeness of the hen proved unsatisfactory to the cock. 


6. April 16. a.m, A pair. 


I caught them shaking. After 6 or 7 shakes they separated ; 
when they were some way apart, the hen went into a feeble cat- 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE, 547 


attitude. The cock dived, and came up five or six yards off 
with a fair-sized bunch of weeds in his mouth. Strange to say, 
he was in something very like the normal swimming attitude, 
though his ruff was fairly well erected. On seeing him the hen 
to my surprise put her crest down, turned, and swam away, and 
the cock could do nothing but drop his weed, lower his crest, too, 
and swim after her. Nothing particular happened in the sub- 
sequent five or ten minutes. 

Here, when the emotional excitement reached a certain pitch, 
the hen had a sudden attack of “coyness” (ef. similar behaviour 
in the female Redshank, Huxley, 12,, p. 651). 


7. April 16. 1.30 p.m. 


I caught a pair shaking. Suddenly, and for no apparent 
reason, the hen flew off, flapping along the water. 1 followed 
her, but she simply settled in an ordinary attitude. However, 
on looking back at the cock again, I found him engaged in 
shaking with another hen. The first hen, therefore, must have 
been a casual acquaintance, who departed hastily on seeing the 
rightful mate coming up. The rightful pair shook 4 or 5 times 
(without any habit-preening), and then on a sudden the cock 
flew a few yards off, and put himself into the best cat-attitude 
IT have seen. He turned round, first one way and then the 
other, just as the Peacock does when in display, and then, 
gradually un-arching his wings and raising his neck, swam back 
to begin shaking once more with his mate. This time they shook 
about ten times; habit-preening began about halfway through, 
and at the same time the ruffs were half lowered. ‘Then they 
both dived nearly simultaneously, and I saw them no more (they 
must have made a very long dive and got into the reeds). 

This is a very good example of the pure Display ceremony (see 
p. 513), here induced by the extra excitement of the previous 
“ flirtation.” 


8. April17. 1.30 p.m. A pair. 


I saw a pair shaking; they went on for a very long time (no 
notes as to habit-preening), and finally one (sex ®) dived. As it 
did so, I saw the other convert its crest into an “ Klizabethan 
ruft”; after a few seconds it too dived. Both came up with weed 
in their mouths, fairly close to each other, and the usual Penguin- 
dance was gone through, followed by a short bout of shaking. 
They then put their crests down, and swam off together. To 
progress faster, they took three long dives, each time going under 
almost simultaneously. After the third dive they came up close 
to a single bird (sex ?), which at once went into the Dundreary- 
attitude, Then all three dived in quick succession, and after 
some time two, which I presume to have been the original pair, 
came up close together, and at once began to shake, starting in 
the excited forward position. After that I lost sight of them. 


548 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


9. April 17. 2.25-3.5 p.m. 


2.25. A pair were swimming about fairly close to each other, 
resting and preening by turns. 

2.28. The hen three times went into the Dundreary-attitude 
with short intervals between. 

2.35. After resting for some minutes, she barked five times in 
succession, and relapsed into the resting position, never, 
however, shutting her eyes. 

2.44. One bird swam off out of sight; the other barked several 
times. After a little bit the first one came back into view, 
and they both began preening themselves. 

2.50. Suddenly a third bird (sex ?) came swimming towards them, 
and when about thirty yards off went into the Dundreary- 
attitude, at the same time giving five long, loud, rolling 
barks. At once both birds of the pair put themselves into 
the same attitude,and faced round on the third Grebe, uttering 
at the same time a series of short, low, and quickly-repeated 
barks. The intruder changed its course a few points and 
went off towards the reeds; directly it was out of the way, 
the pair “ got up and shook.” The shaking, however, only 
lasted for a short time, and they then relapsed into their 
previous state of preening and swimming about. 

2.55. After they had swum out of sight and back again, I saw 
one of them (sex ?) go to one side in Dundreary-attitude, 
calling repeatedly, and on looking further afield discovered 
the reason for this in the shape of an intruding single 
bird (sex ?) (probably not the previous intruder) who 
was approaching in the same position and uttering the same 
ery, about thirty yards away. This single bird then dived 
and came up not six feet away from the other. They were 
now in an attitude I had never seen before—hbest de- 
scribed as the most hostile possible form of the “ Dundreary,” 
differing from the typical form chiefly in that the heads 
were not quite so low down. For some time they stayed 
thus facing each other, still, or moving a little forwards as if 
to attack, and then at once thinking better of it, and all the 
time giving the low, quick bark. Finally the second bird 
of the pair came up, giving a loud grinding trumpet-call, and 
then all of a sudden there was a great flying of all the three at 
each other, and at the end of it one bird went off, and two 
(undoubtedly the original pair) were left together ; they at 
once approached and shook; the shaking, however, only 
went on for a short time, and then, after a few minutes’ 
preening, I lost them. 

Here, twice over, it is obvious that the presence of a third bird 
has screwed excitement to the shaking-point ; the remarkable 
thing in both cases is, that the bouts of shaking thus induced 
should last so short a time, whereas on another occasion (April 16, 
1.30 p.m.) a similarly-induced bout ended very differently. 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 549 


10) Ape lis) “p.m: 

A single bird (I think a hen) was swimming about, gave the 
double-trumpet twice or thrice, and then looked about. Another 
bird, some forty yards off, noticed the call and turned, and they 
swam quite slowly towards each other. When they had reached 
each other, they began shaking, very excitedly at first. After 
six or seven shakes, the hen suddenly turned straight away from 
the cock, and flew or spluttered some eight yards away. She 
. then put herself into a fine cat-attitude, and began turning from 
side to side—all this without uttering any call. The cock watched 
her thus for several seconds, and then dived and swam just below 
the surface, making a ripple, and as this approached her, the hen 
drew her head down ever lower on her breast. When four or five 
feet off, the cock put his head and neck out—apparently to see 
where he was, for he disappeared again at once. When he 
finally appeared if was three feet beyond the hen, and he was 
facing away from her as he “ grew out of the water” into the 
customary ghostly Penguin ; he turned to face the hen as he 
subsided, and finally shook with her. This bout was only a short 
one, however, and after it they swam some distance apart. After 
a minute or so the hen gave two double-trumpets, but then 
relapsed into the state, from which the cock had never emerged, 
of doing nothing in particular, and in this state some minutes 
later I left them. | 

This differs from the typical Discovery ceremony in two points: 
(1) the birds do not usually swim together thus, but one dives at 
once, (2) the cock does not generally wait and watch the hen’s 
display (“ cat-attitude ”) before making his “ ghost-dive.” 


11. April 18. 10.40 a.m. to 12.17 p.m. A pair. 


10.40. I saw a pair close together, the cock and hen easily 
distinguishable. 

10.45. They preened close together for some time. 

10.48. They swam off together and got close inshore. 

10.52. Both dived once or twice, I think for fish. 

After preening themselves for a bit (10.56-10.59) they began 
diving again near the bank, and the cock caught a small fish. 

11.0. They came up close together and began shaking; but they 
only gave three or four shakes, and their ruffs were scarcely 
half expanded. 

11.2. Again after a dive they came up close together, and again 
had a bout of shaking. This time they shook 10 or 12 
times, and their ruffs were well up; there was no habit- 
preening. 

11.8. After some minutes’ swimming about further out from 
the bank, occasionally picking up things from the surface of 
the water, they swam together with outstretched necks 
(the forward swimming - attitude), the hen swimming 
much the faster. As they approached, and while their 
necks were still stretched forward, they began to shake, but 


MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


they never put their ruffs properly up, and after five or six 
shakes, during which the necks were gradually raised, but 
not to their full height, the shaking degenerated into habit- 
preening, and this into real preening. 


11.10. They swam off and began diving again near the bank. After 


the second dive they came up only about three yards apart, 
and both shook their heads three or four times; the shaking 
was not very vigorous, and ‘‘ had not much reference to the 
other bird ”—i. e. they did not come and face each other in 
the customary way. They then swam out from the bank. 
As they passed a solitary hen some way off, the hen of the 
pair, who was between her cock and the single bird, went 
into the Dundreary-attitude. From 11.12--11.22 they swam 
about, picked things off the surface, fished, and took long 
“‘ progressive ” dives, ending up near the opposite bank of 
the reservoir. 


11.23-11.28. After a dive they came up fairly close together, 


and swam towards each other with outstretched necks, which 
they gradually raised as they neared each other, beginning 
to shake their heads at the same time. <A prodigious bout 
of shaking ensued, and was followed by diving for weed, 
swimming together, beautiful penguin-actions, and final 
bout of shaking. The whole thing has been already de- 
scribed in detail in section 4c, p. 499. Here suffice it to say 
that the hen began habit-preening before the cock, and once 
begun, practised it more than he. She too dived first, came 
up first, and had more weed in her mouth. 


11.29-11.39. They swam back towards where I first saw them, 


often picking things off the surface. A. solitary cock was 
close to the line of route, and our cock went into the 
Dundreary-attitude as he passed the odd bird. 


11.40. They dived. The cock came up first, and gave a couple 


of shakes “to himself” (cf.11.10). Then the hen came up, 
and they shook together four or five times, but without 
raising their crests at all, or their necks to their full extent; 
they then went on fishing near the bank. 


11.49. They stopped fishing; the hen began preening. The 


cock swam towards her from some thirty yards off. She 
came a little way to meet him, and they shook seven times 
with their ruffs half-up. The bout ended in habit- 
preening. 


11.56. After swimming about and preening they had another 


shake. This again was a very long one, like that at 11.23 
(I did not count the number of shakes, as I was more intent 
trying to make out various details of attitude); indeed it 
was almost a precise replica of this previous long one, and 
had the same sequel—a fine ‘ Penguin-dance.” The only 
differences I could see were that their ruffs were not quite so 
“sun-like” before diving, that both brought up plenty of 
weed, that I am almost sure a good deal of the weed was 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 551 


eaten, and that the final bout of shaking was less than half 
as long. 

12.0-12.15. The birds now swim about, preen themselves, dive, 
and pick things off the surface. The cock is now more 
active in searching for food than the hen, while previously 
the reverse had been true. At 12.8 they passed another 
bird (sex ?). My hen went close up to it, then swam rather 
rapidly away, then close up again. However, nothing 
happens, and neither bird goes into the Dundreary-attitude. 

12.15. They pass neara single bird, which I think is a hen—the 
cock, who was leading, took no notice of it; but the hen 
went into the straight-necked (or angry) Dundreary-attitude 
and, without giving any call, swam at the third bird. ‘The 
solitary one turned, swam away, and finally flew some 
fifteen yards off, upon which my hen turned, assumed 
a normal attitude, and swam back towards her mate. No 
shaking or other expression of emotion, however, took place. 

12.17. They began fishing close inshore. 

12.18. I took my eyes off them, and when I looked back could no 
longer be sure of them among the several birds along the 
shore. 

My notes on this pair I have given in full because I had them 
under continuous observation for a considerable time (over an 
hour and a half). Their behaviour is of interest in various ways. 
In the first place, we see how, in this pair at least, outbursts of 
violent emotional actions alternate with calm periods during 
which the birds rest or feed, occasionally indulging in a short 
and rather languid bout of shaking. When passing near a third 
bird, one of the pair usually went into the threatening attitude 
(Dundreary). In every case I could be sure about, the bird that 
did this was of the same sex as the third or single bird. The 
pair had marked idiosyncrasies of its own, both as regards what it 
did do and what it did not do: and besides this, both cock and 
hen had tricks of their own in performing the courtship-actions, 
which I think were certainly permanent and not due to changeable 
physiological states. 

All this took place on the reedless reservoir, where there are no 
nests, and consequently far away from the scene of actual pairing. 
Physiologically, therefore, the ‘‘ courtship ” and the act of pairing 
are entirely detached from each other. 


12. April 18. 2.30 p.m. 

A pair shook about forty times, with habit-preening. At the end 
they turned their backs on one another, still shaking and habit- 
preening—to themselves, as it were,—but gradually letting their 
erests sink. When about twenty yards apart they turned, swam 
slowly together, and shook a little, but without raising their crests. 
Then for about a quarter of an hour they stayed quietly facing 
each other, preening themselves. After this there was a short 
bout of shaking, then a rest, then another bout of some thirty 


552 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


shakes. This, like the long first bout, was followed by their turning 
their backs on each other and shaking “ to themselves ”—a couple 
of shakes and 6 or 7 “ habit-preens.” This time, however, instead 
of turning, both dived suddenly and simultaneously; they 
emerged about forty yards apart, swam rapidly in the forward 
swimming-attitude towards each other, and shook about fifteen 
times. After a couple more short bouts, one of them (sex ?) 
drove off a third bird which had been following at a little 
distance, then came back and shook with its mate. Another 
short bout with ruff down, and then they rested for some time, 
waking up once to give four languid shakes. A solitary hen 
suddenly called some way off; my cock roused himself and 
advanced towards her. She first retired, but then came towards 
him, and they began to shake. This did not last long, however, 
for the cock’s rightful mate dived and came up between the 
two that were shaking. She drove the stranger away, and then 
came back and had a bout of twenty shakes or so with her mate. 
After a time of resting they had a longish bout—some twenty- 
five shakes—and as before turned back to back. This time the 
procedure was again altered. When 20 or 25 yards away, the cock 
dived; the hen waited for him, with her ruff down. He appeared 
after nearly half a minute, with some weed in his bill, a little 
closer to the hen. He approached, but dropped the weed before 
getting to her, and they only indulged in a short bout of shaking. 
They then rested and swam to and fro, till a solitary hen 
appeared near by, when my cock went up to her. They started 
to shake, but suddenly the cock changed his attitude and drove 
the stranger away. ‘This change of front was probably due to, 
and certainly coincident with, the approach of its rightful mate. 
Then both swam off in one direction. The cock, who was leading 
by about 50 yards, went close up to a solitary hen who was 
ealling, but at the last moment turned and swam back to his 
mate, with whom he had a short bout of shaking. After a long 
spell of swimming about and fishing, they called to each other, 
approached, and had a long bout of.shaking, with less habit- 
preening than usual. Again they ended by doing the “ back-to- 
back” trick, and again they dived simultaneously. This time, 
however, when they came up (some twenty yards apart), though 
the hen had nothing, the cock had a very large bunch of weed 
in his mouth. They swam together and went through the 
regular penguin-actions, he shaking the weed from side to side. 
Unfortunately, here again it could not be seen what eventually 
happened to the weed. When they settled down on to the 
water they did not shake, but separated and swam off together 
for fifty yards or so. Then he dived; she followed suit after two 
or three seconds. They came up about twenty-five yards apart, 
he once more with weed, she once more without it. They swam 
together, but he dropped the weed when only a couple of feet off, 
and all they did was to shake for a short time. They then went 
off fishing, and were lost sight of. 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE, 553 


This pair is also interesting in various ways. The “ back-to- 
back’”’ position was never seen in any other birds. Here, too, the 
pair itself and both the individual birds of the pair had well- 
marked idiosynerasies. ‘The very frequent bouts of shaking, the 
several ‘ flirtations” of the cock, and the fact that the cock 
brought weeds up three times (the hen not at all) are all worthy 
of note. The twice-repeated dropping of the weed just before 
the cock reached the hen is very curious; perhaps the hen’s 
having no weed had something to do with it. 

Once more, too, it is seen that all these emotional actions may 
take place far from the nest, and so without any direct relation 
to the act of pairing. 


13. April18. 2.50-3.35 p.m. 


Two birds, one certainly a cock, the other doubtful, were 
swimming about and fishing, 10 to 30 yards apart. Each 
frequently went into the Dundreary attitude and barked, 
apparently at the other, the obvious cock less frequently. Once 
the doubtful bird dived and came up a dozen yards or so from the 
other; both advanced a couple of yards, stopped, regarded each 
other for some moments (rather fiercely, it seemed to me), and 
then retreated. I watched them for three-quarters of an hour, 
and their general behaviour was the same throughout, except 
that they ‘‘ Dundrearied ” less frequently as time went on. 

I do not understand the relation between these two birds. I 
think it was a hostile one; possibly they were two cocks on the 
borders of their respective territories and jealous of their 
_ frontier rights. 


14. April19. 6.30-6.40 p.m. Close to the reeds. 


Here was a curious little “‘ domestic drama” :— 

A. pair was swimming about together, and a solitary hen with 
a very small ruff was not far off. She was obviously very much 
wanting some emotional excitement, for she kept on swimming 
up towards the cock, especially when the other and ‘“ rightful” 
hen was some way off. ‘he lone bird would swim up to within 
three or four yards, eagerly, yet nervously, then turn and go off 
as if frightened. The cock was rather indifferent ; once or twice 
he began swimming after her, but never got far. Once he was 
left mid-way between the two hens, and behaved exactly like the 
legendary Ass between the two equidistant bundles of hay. He 
looked first one way, then the other, back and forth, back and 
forth. At length his mate came a bit nearer, and he at once 
turned and swam towards her. 

At length the cock’s mate dived: the ‘“‘ wrong” hen at once 
dived too, and when she came up found the other hen between 
herself and the cock. After a minute or so she approached again, 
and this time all three birds dived several times, and finally the 
single bird was driven right away. 


5d4 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


Throughout, curiously enough, there was no sound, nor any 
erection of crests, nor any going into Dundreary-position ; all 
three birds stayed always in the normal swimming attitude. 
Whether the late hour had anything to do with this I cannot say. 
The diving and driving away, however, showed that there was 
some very real jealousy aroused. 

It is worth noting that the second time his mate dived to drive 
the strange hen away, the cock joined her, but not the first time. 


15. April 20. a.m. 


I noticed two birds shaking vigorously. At the close of the 
bout, a third bird—a hen—came slowly up to the shakers from 
where she had been resting some twenty yards away. As she 
came nearer, the cock seemed to look with some hostility at the 
bird with whom he had just been shaking. This bird, as the 
event conclusively proved, was only a stranger, and the hen that 
had been approaching was his rightful mate. The ‘‘right ” hen 
then swam at the “ wrong” one and drove her away (no flying or 
diving); then she turned and swam towards the cock. When 
still three or four feet apart they started shaking, in the excited 
forward shaking-attitude, with ruffs well up. There were about 
twenty shakes; as the bout went on the birds lapsed into the 
ordinary shaking-attitude, The strange hen stayed close by, but 
after the shaking was over, the cock’s rightful mate swam at her, 
and there was “‘ confused diving,” eventually ‘ involving ” all three 
birds, aud ending in the odd bird being driven off. 

The stimulus given to emotional excitement by jealousy is here 
well brought out; but it is curious that the cock’s true mate, 
although so close, did not interfere until his bout of shaking with 
the stranger was over and done with. 


11. MisceLLAngEous Novres. 

1. Fishing. 

The birds may often be seen to pick small objects off the surface 
of the water, often going on for a considerable time. These 
objects seem certainly to be eaten, but what they are I do not 
know. This habit does not appear to have been previously 
noted. 

One bird which I saw fishing by itself for over an hour (a 
very long time for a Grebe to do anything continuously) had a 
curious habit of putting its head right down into the water 
with bill vertical, till the eyes were just covered. It once 
stayed like this for a good quarter of a minute, but usually it 
took its head out after a few seconds, then after a few more 
seconds put it in again, and so on, all the while swimming slowly 
forwards. It was apparently looking for prey. I saw it dive 
while its head was below the surface, but it once dived from the 
normal position—7. e. without any preliminary searching. In 
other Grebes I have never noticed this habit. 

When fishing, they often go along the bank and look for shoals 


COURTSHIP OF TIE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 55D 


of small fish, for when they dive for food close in shore one often 
sees swarms of little silvery fish spring into the air all round. 


2. Relations with birds of other species. 


When a Grebe is on the nest, it resents the too close proximity 
of other birds. One hen that I saw sitting was twice annoyed by 
Moorhens coming too close; she raised herself from the resting 
position, bent her neck forward, and definitely (though rather 
shghtly—about to the ‘‘ half pear- shaped position”) erected her 
ruff (I am doubtful as to her “ ears”). Once she was silent, but 
once she gave a low rasping note. On this the Moorhens 
retreated. 

This same hen was also roused from her snoozing by the call 
of a Coot near by; their sleep on the nest must be very light. 

Onee, on the open water, I saw a hen Tufted Duck happen to 
come close by a Grebe. The Grebe, strange to say, seemed 
greatly alarmed, flapped off for some yards, and dived, regaining 
ealm again when the surface was regained at a safe distance. 

When neither bird is sitting, the Grebes’ nests and platforms are 
often ascended by other birds. Several times I have seen Moor- 
hens climb on to nests with covered eggs, peck about for food, 
and swim off. On what was probably a pairing-platform I once 
or twice saw a pair of Wild Duck, and several times a pair of 
Shovellers ; they were enjoying a comfortable nap ! 

On one occasion a Maliard was seen on a nest: a Grebe came 
along with a mouthful of weed for the nest, and at its approach the 
intruder hastily got off; the Grebe, bower. , pursued him for three 
or four yards, before turning and laying the weed on the nest. 


3. The Grebe essentially diurnal. 


In the spring of 1911 I had been on the Welsh coast, where 
> there was an abundance of shore-birds. Of these, certainly the 
Redshank, Sheldrake, and Curlew (and very likely others) seemed 
to be as wakeful by night as by day, and the special and unmis- 
takable courtship-notes of the first two species were heard all 
night long, especially on moonlight nights. 

My brother and I each slept out a night at the reservoirs to see 
whether the Grebes behaved in a similar way. During the dark 
hours, however, there was nothing to be seen or heard of the 
ines. In the early morning, at the first faint showing of the 
false dawn, a few Grebes began to call, and various other birds, 
too, showed signs of activity. Unfortunately, between this and 
actual sunrise I fell asleep again. My brother, however, watched 
the whole period without noting anything of interest. Pyeraft 
(11) finds the same hold good in September. Selous (’01) says 
that, like many other birds, the Grebe is most active in the first 
hour or two after it has become light. 

The Crested Grebe is thus a pur ely diurnal species : such birds 
as Owls and Nightjars are purely nocturnal (or perhaps late- 


Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. XX XIX, 39 


556 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


crepuscular would be more accurate, especially for the Nightjar, 
who is silent for at least the three or four midnight hours); 
while in some species, like the Redshank (or the cock Nightingale 
in spring), periods of activity and rest alternate throughout the 
twenty-four hours. 


4. Rest and reserve. 


In spite of its being active only during the daylight hours, the 
Grebe spends many of these resting, in the attitude so well 
described by Selous as resembling a pork-pie (see Pl. I. fig. 2). 
This is but one further instance of the principle of reserve that 
runs through all life. In watching birds two forms of this are 
especially brought under notice—the reserve of time and the 
reserve of nervous energy that are present in normally favour- 
able conditions. 

In the Grebe, the many hours of the day spent in sleeping, 
or at least in what Sidis calls the hypnoidal state, represent 
the time-reserve. These extra hours of sleep, of course, in- 
crease the energy-reserve. This latter is,in most birds, got rid of 
in actions which seem entirely without biological significance— 
they merely excite pleasure by releasing the energy in bodily 
movement or in sound: think of the pleasure-flights of gulls in 
early spring, or of swallow-broods in late summer (here accom- 
panied by twitterings), or the antics of wagtails in fine autumns 
on the lawns. In the spring, however, the surplus energy of 
many birds has been seized upon by Sexual Selection, and used 
up in fighting or in display (ef. Wallace's general ideas on the 
role of energy in Sexual Selection, and Howard (713)).) 
the Grebe, similarly, it has been diverted into fresh channels 
through Mutual Selection, and thus pressed more directly into 
the service of the species. 


5. Powers of learning by experience. 


As an interesting side-light on the psychology of these birds, I 
will record an incident seen by my brother. 

A Grebe had caughta very large fish and was trying to swallow 
it in the usual way, first throwing its head violently back and 
then stopping it suddenly, thus jerking the fish (which, of course, 
is held so that its head was foremost) down the throat. This fish 
however, was too big. After a long period of fruitless jerking, 
the bird was forced to put the fish out into the water. The fish, 
being still alive, swam off. This was too much for the Grebe, 
who at once dived, caught it again, and again attempted i 
swallow it. Naturally it had again to put it out and the whole 
process was repeated. It attempted to swallow the fish four times : 
the fifth time it let it swim off as best it could. The whole thing 
is thus a reflex chain: ‘“ See fish—catch fish—try to swallows 
use—put fish out:—See fish....” and soon. It did, however 
profit by experience, for each time it made rather fewer efforts th 
swallow it, and at last stopped its fruitless trying altogether, 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE, NG 


6. Calls. 


I give a brief list of the chief calls employed by the Grebe. As 
we should expect in a bird with such a complex emotional life, 
different calls are used in different cireumstances—we have in 
them another method of expressing emotions. 

(i.) Zhe groan.—Typically, a deepish, fairly loud groaning 
sound, not guttural or rolling ; occasionally it was given on a 
somewhat higher note, and then “ rolled ” slightly. 

This is not acommon call: I only heard it coming from birds 
in the reeds. I do not know with what emotions or actions it is 
associated. 

(i1.) The bark.—This is given when one bird is searching for its 
mate (first stage of Discovery ceremony), or as an indication of 
hostility towards a bird of another pair; and, I think, on no other 
occasions : it seems, also, only to be uttered when the bird is in 
the Dundreary attitude. There are two chief variations -—_ 


(2) A loud, rolling, rather shrill and “trumpeting ” bark, 
several times repeated. 

() A much less loud bark, not so long, not shrill at all, nor 
rolling ; repeated quite quickly, but only a few times. 


(1i1.) Zhe shaking call.—This is only given during a bout of 
shaking. I believe the two are always associated (except 
perhaps at the end of very long bouts). It is especially marked 
when shaking takes place in the “ forward ” position. 

It consists in a rapid alternation of two sounds on two notes — 
a consonantal sound—4’p or #c—on the low note, and an indefinite 
vowel sound about a tone higher. 

(iv.) Zhe “ Double Trumpet.”—This is a very strange-sounding 
call, generally given from the reeds, often when near the nest. 
It is somewhat of the same timbre as the love-call of the Tufted 
Duck, but lower, louder, and more throaty—being, indeed, 
extremely guttural. 

It is composed of two halves, with a slight pause between. 
The first half is something like ah or aw, three or four times 
repeated, and rises very slightly. The second half may be repre- 
sented thus :—swaa-aa-ah: it sinks rapidly, and is as it were 
pressed out, being loudest in the middle. 

(v.) The “ Dentist-cull.”—I have given it this name as it re- 
minded me irresistibly of that rotating instrument of torture 
used by dentists for boring. Imagine the biggest burr grinding 
very stiffly for a few seconds, then suddenly running more freely 
and whirring for a little. This will give a very good idea of the 
sound: and this double sound is repeated several times. I have 
only heard it from the reeds: it often follows the “« groan.” 

(vi.) Zhe Owl call.—This very much resembles the common 
“ker-wick” of the Brown Owl, except that the initial k and w are 
not given by the Grebe. It may be repeated, and is often heard. 
Perhaps it is the simplest, least definitely emotional call-note 
(recognition-note). 

39* 


558 MR. J. S. HUXLEY ON THE 


7. Territories. 
For a general review of the subject, see H. Eliot Howard (13). 


Like most (or all) monogamous birds, each pair of Grebes 
appears to stake out for itself a definite region or territory, 
from which intruders of the same species are jealously driven off. 

The Grebe, however, differs from birds like the Warblers, and 
from the Kingfisher. Such birds live almost exclusively in their 
own territory during the whole of the breeding-season, feeding, 
sleeping, courting, and nesting in it. With the Grebe, on the 
other hand, the territory (to judge from my own experience and 
from certain of Selous’s observations) is a comparatively small 
piece of water in the vicinity of the nest, and therefore near the 
reeds. The open water and the shore, when bare of reeds, is 
‘Common Land,” so that almost all the fishing is free to all. 
And thus, as a matter of observation, nearly all the feeding and 
nearly all the courtship of the birds takes place on this common 
ground. This fits in very well with the fact that all the hostilities 
I have ever seen on open water were apparently always due to 
sex-jealousy. It is only in respect of nesting, of pairing and 
the pairing-ceremonies (and probably of sleeping) that the birds 
restrict themselves to their territories. 

So far as the relation of food and territories go, one might 
draw parallels between birds and man; the affairs of the Warblers 
would correspond to (present-day) agricultural conditions, the 
Kingfisher gives us riparian ownership of fisheries, while the free 
deep-sea fisheries are represented by the common open-water 
of the Grebe. 


8. Swimming Abilities. 


Two feats of skill call for notice. In the first place, I have 
twice seen birds swimming forwards, in a comparatively straight 
line, and apparently with intention, while their heads were tucked 
away under their wings. 

In the second place, I have seen a Grebe, when frightened off 
her nest, dive and swim a good forty yards under water before 
rising, although the water was so shallow that she made a ripple 
on the surface all the time, and so overgrown with reeds that the 
bird’s course had to swerve continually round the obstacles. 


9. Stretching of Wings. 


Every bird-watcher must be familiar with the habit of Cor- 
morants and Shags, of holding their wings out from the body, 
apparently for the purpose of sunning them. I have observed 
this in the Grebe, but curiously enough only in one bird, which 
acted thus twice in ten minutes. It had been preening itself, 
and suddenly, raising its anterior end slightly, it stretched its 
wings horizontally. They were much arched, and showed the 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE. 559 


white bars very distinctly. After 15 or 20 seconds, during which 
I think a little further preening was done, the wings were brought 
back to the normal position. 


12. Postscript. 


Owing to accidental circumstances, it was unfortunately only 
after the completion of the MS. of this paper that I was able to 
read Mr. W. P. Pyeraft’s interesting book on the Courtship of 
Animals (Pyeraft, 713). 

As Lintend to attack the problem of the relations of Mutual 
and Sexual Selection in a more general article, it will be un- 
necessary to discuss bis general conclusions here m detail. Let 
me only say that had I, before writing this paper, read his general 
discussion of female choice and of the modifications required in 
Darwin’s original Sexual Selection theory, much of my own 
theoretical conclusions would have been differently expressed, 
although perhaps not essentially altered. 

Let it be particularly noted, however, that Mr. Pycraft himself 
is careful to point out that Darwin’s main conclusions stand firm. 
As I understand it, the chief modification necessary relates to 
female choice. Display and ornament do not act on the esthetic 
sense of the female, but on her emotional state; they are—using 
the words in no narrow or unpleasant sense—excitants, aphro- 
_ disiaes, serving to raise the female into that state of exaltation 

and emotion when alone she will be ready to pair. This is 
brought out most vividly in the nuptial behaviour of the Newts 
(Pycraft, “13, p. 170). No one, after reading this, can fail to 
understand not only that the pure Darwinian theory needs 
modifying, but also the direction in which it must be modified. 

But the element of choice does, in another form, remain. In 
animals such as Birds, where there is a regular pairing-up season, 
and where, too, the mental processes are already of considerable 
complexity, it is impossible to doubt but that mating may be, and 
in some species is, guided by impulse, unanalysable fancies, indi- 
vidual predilection. There, in a rudimentary state, we find that 
form of “ choice ”—intuitive, unreasoned, but none the less im- 
pervious, and none the less in its results a true choice—which 
reaches its highest stage of development in the intensely-felt 
affinities of man and woman—in that condition known as “ falling 
in love,” where the whole of the subconscious mental activities 
become grafted on to the inherited sexual passions, the whole 
past of the mental organism is summed up in the present, in 
the intensely real act of choice which chooses one from among 
thousands and says, whether in words or no, “that one being, 
and no other, is the being that I desire for my mate.” 

That a choice of this type can exist in birds is shown by the 
subject of this memoir. ‘The individual variations in the court- 
ship-actions provide the raw material for preferential mating, 
and the fact that the birds of a pair often both show some 


560 MR, J. 8S. HUXLEY ON THE 


special variation in the form of action, in itself proves that 
such preferential mating may and does occur. 

The first modification of Darwin’s ideas leads to a second—to a 
modification of the way in which Sexual Selection works. If 
display is normally an excitant, then there is no ‘“ need” for a 
preponderance of males, nor for actual rivalry between several 
males. Selection is primarily a matter of level. The female does 
not choose the “ best” out of a bunch of suitors ; but those males 
in which the ornaments and display-habits do not reach a certain 
standard, will not be able to raise the female’s emotional state to 
the requisite pitch, and so will die without offspring. (‘This state- 
ment as it stands goes too far; it will serve, however, for the 
time, to show the general idea.) 

This primitive condition has been modified in two ways (and 
on the existence of these two quite distinct lines of development 
I feel Mr. Pycraft has not laid sufficient stress). In the first 
place, in polygamous and polyandrous (and perhaps “ promis- 
cuous ”?) species there may bea rivalry between several males 
in the presence of the females, as in the Ruffand Prairie Hen. 

Jn the second place, the line of mutual selection was started. 
Whether in origin mutual displays too acted as excitants, it is 
not yet possible to say until more observations are at hand. That 
such may be the case, is possible from some observations of my 
own on the Herring-Gull. At any rate, in specialized forms of 
this form of courtship, such as that of our Grebe, this excitatory 
function is completely in abeyance. 

With Mr. Pycraft’s insistence, first, on the principle of Ortho- 
genesis and its importance for the origin of sexual (and other) 
forms of ornamentation, and secondly, on the necessity for a 
psychological pomt of view in our interpretation of the courtship- 
phenomena of animals, I am in entire agreement. 


List or LrreraturReE. 


713. Howarp, H. Exior.—The British Warblers. Parts 1-8. 
Londen, 1907-13. 

*12,, Huxuey, J. S.—A First Account of the Courtship of the 
Redshank (Yotanus calidris Linn.). 
P. ZS. 1912, pp. 647-655. 

Z12.. " 55 The Great Crested Grebe and the idea 
of Secondary Sexual Characters. 
Science, n. s. vol. xxxvi. pp. 601— 
602. 

"11. Pycrarr, W. P.—Habits of the Great Crested Grebe. 
Bield, vol. exviii.- Oct.. 7, @l9ii 
pp. 823-824. 

ES, ° The Courtship of Animals. Hutchin- 
son & Co. London, 1913. 


COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE, 561 


701. Senous, E.—An Observational Diary of the Habits—mostly 
domestic —of the Great Crested 
Grebe (Podicipes cristatus). Zoolo- 
gist, May 1901, pp. 161-183, Sept. 
1901, pp.339-350, Dec. 1901, pp. 454— 
462, Apr. 1902, pp. 133-144. 


02. i (Reversed pairing in Moorhens.) Zoologist, 
May 1902, pp. 196, 197. 
"13. Pe (Display of Swans.) Zoologist, Aug. 1913, 


pp- 294-313. 


Screntiric NAMES OF BIRDS MENTIONED IN THE TEXT. 


To save constant reference to birds by both English and scien- 
tific names, and to help foreign readers, T append this list. 


Blue Tit. Parus ceruleus L. 
Bustard. Otis tarda L. 

Coot. Fulica atra L. 

Dabchick. Podiceps fluviatilis (Tunst.). 
Egret. Ardea, Egretta, Herodias, Garzetta. 
Fulmar Petrel. Fulmarus glacialis (1L.). 
Guillemot. Uria troile (L.). 

Heron. Ardea. 

Herring-Gull. Larus argentatus Gmel. 
Kagu. Rhinochetus jubatus. 
Mallard. Anas boschas L., 3. 
Moorhen. Gallinula chloropus (l.). 
Peacock. Pawo cristatus L. 

Prairie Hen. Tympanuchus americanus. 
Razorobill. Alcea torda L. 

Redshank. Totanus calidris (L.). 
Shoveller. Anas clypeata (L.). 

Snipe. Gallinago celestis (Frenz.). 
Swan (Whooper). Cygnus musicus Bechst. 
Tufted Duck. Fuligula cristata (Leach). 
Warblers. Sylviidee. 

Wild Duck. Anas boschas L. 


EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. 


[The figures were drawn from my notes and rough sketches by Miss Woodward, 
to whom I am much indebted for the interest and_ care she has shown. Taken as a 
whole, they give a far more graphic and accurate idea of the birds’ general appearance 
and behaviour than any other illustrations of which I know. | 


All figures refer to Podiceps cristatus. 


PruateE I. 


Fig. 1. Head and neck, showing ruff and ears relaxed. 
2. Resting attitude. Note the position of the head, and the curve of breast 
and rump. In most figures these are erroneously represented. 
3. Search (Dundreary) attitude. Note the ears relaxed, the crest spread 
longitudinally (sometimes it may touch the water). 


ON THE COURTSHIP OF THE GREAT CRESTED GREBE, 


. Head and neck in Shaking-attitude (ears erected vertically, ruff pear-shaped). 
. Shaking-attitude from behind. Note the curious shape of the lower part of 


the neck. 


. A pair in the Forward (exeited) Shaking-attitude. Note the head bent 


down, the neck strained forward; the slope of the body and cock of the 
tail are also very characteristic. 


. The Cat-attitude (Display). The general attitude is very well represented. 


More white should show on the breast; and the dark portion of the 
wings should be grey. ‘To represent them black lessens the effect of the 
real black on the crest, which in actual life is the central aud most con- 
spicuous part of the picture. 


. The Passive Pairing-attitude. Note the strange stiff appearance, the humped 
b=) i=) ) 


back, and the total closure of the crest. 


Prare II. 


. The “ Ghostly Penguin” (attitude on emergence of the diving bird in the 


Display Ceremony). Note the head bent down, and the forward curve 
ot the top of the neck. 


. The same as fig. 9, side-view. Owing to the short time occupied in the 


action, Icamnot myself be sure that all the details in figs. 9 and 10 are 
accurate. The general appearance, however, is well given. 


. A pair shaking. Note the erect necks, and the tails slightly cocked up. 
. Display Ceremony : the diving bird just fully emerged. (This is the only 


tigure which is not satisfactory. It gives the positions etc. well, but does 
not recall reality in the vivid way done by the others.) 


. The Penguin Dance. Here again the whole ceremony takes such a short 


time that I cannot vouch for details; but the general appearance is very 
well suggested. 


P Z. S. 1914, PERKINS. Pl. I. 


= > = 
Ue aay 
| 
= 
“ 
7 


lo |4 8 
Cn i 
l! 
15 17 
AS aN hat By 
\2 16 
13 
20 
22 


R.C.L. Perkins, del. Bale & Deamelsacn lc imp - 


STRUCTURAL CHARACTERS OF PARALASTOR, SAUSS. 


ON THE WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 563 


34. On the Species of Alastor (Paralastor) Sauss. and some 
other Hymenoptera of the Fanily Humenidee. By R. 
C. L. Perzins, M.A., D.i8e., F.Z.8. 
[Received April 9, 1914; Read May 19, 1914.] 
(Plate 1.*) 


INDEX. 
Ethology : Pages 
Paralastor, mimetic colour-groups of ............... 6... 563-565 
Geographical : 
Paratastor, am Australian Genus) 22. 5.).21..6 02. -20---e---e 563 
Systematic :' 
Paralastor, division of Alastor Sauss., raised to generie¢ 
PUN ra Seas raeea sore Gedennd ecieromae hacen Se 563 
A NE WeSPEGCIES Oli seh ecu eoess seen Seek eee) (B79=621 
Pseudozethus australensis, gen. et sp. N..........-....... 622-623 
JETT OPOCUIO COUSUREHKAD OR S\05 Wo ga3d06 bab 5d00ce 264 05a 464 oo dcr 623 
Abispa meade-waldoensis, Sp. 0. .....-...-seveeeee eee ee ees 623 


The name Paralastor was given by Saussure to one of the several 
divisious of the genus Alastor which were characterized by him. 
It includes all the species of the Australian region, except one, 
Paralastoroides clotho Lep., and this differs but little from the 
other Australian species. 

Paralastor is a valid genus, and has no close affinity with the 
non-Australasian forms included in Alastor. Its most remark- 
able character lies in the structure of the antennz of the male, the 
peculiarities of which were quite overlooked by Saussure, as they 
were also in other genera of Eumenide, such as Abispa and 
Pachodynerus. The antenne of Paralastor g consist always of 
eight well-developed joints, followed by four, three, or two small, 
or often very minute, ones. This deficiency in the normal 
number of joints of the male is always accompanied in both sexes 
by a thoracic structure, so different from that of the Alastor of 
other countries that the genus is extremely well defined. The 
thoracic characters have been so clearly stated by Saussure that 
it is not necessary to repeat them here. 

The 8. African species Alustor brawnsi Meade- Waldo, and Alastor 
variolosus Bingham from Ceylon are members of one group, 
quite distinct from Paralastor, having ordinary male antenne 
with the normal number of joints (13), as in Odynerws and like 
European Alastor. On the other hand, the E. African Khynch- 
alastor fuscipennis M.-W. is more related to the S. American 
species, such as A. melanosoma Sauss., but the clypeus is pointed 
at the apex and the 2nd ventral segment of the abdomen has a 
costate sulcature followed by a deep large impression, and is not 
merely flattened between lateral carinations. 

The coloration of the species of Paralastor is interesting, in 
that, like the Odynerus of the Hawaiian Islands and elsewhere, 


* For explanation of the Plate see p. 624. 


564 DP. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


the species form a number of distinctive colour-groups, which are 
quite different from the groups formed by them when characters 
of structure are considered, Particularly interesting are the 
species of the second division of the genus as arranged by me, 
since several of these closely resemble small species of Australian 
Icaria, social wasps, which are found in the same localities. 
‘he resemblance is rendered far more perfect from the fact that 
in these Paralastor the basal abdominal segment is reduced in 
size and is less wide than usual, so that the abdomen approaches 
in form that of some of these social wasps. 

As to the other division of Paralastor, the species not only form 
colour-groups amongst themselves, but these groups mostly, and 
perhaps all of them, reproduce the colours and patterns of other 
genera of solitary wasps, Odynerus, Rhynchiuvm, and Abispa. 
Even the bees of the genus Hylaeoides (Prosopide) are drawn 
into these colour-groups, and both in these bees and some of the 
Odynerus the resemblance extends beyond the matter of colour, 
so that certain peculiarities of structure are reproduced in all. I 
have elsewhere (Ann. & Mag. N.H. (8) ix. 1912, p. 108, Hylacoides, 
and p. 121, Abispa) referred to cases of this structural mimicry 
combined with mimicry in colour. How great is the resemblance 
may be judged from Saussure’s description of Alastor fraternus, 
of which he says: ‘‘ Presque identique par la coloration avec les 
Odynerus clypeatus et concolor; formes les mémes,” ete.; but this 
case, naturally, does not compare in interest with that of the bee 
HHylaeoides, where structures identical with those of Paralastor 
are assumed, these structures being unique in that family of bees 
to which Hylaeoides belongs. In the case of the Odynerus and 
other Eumenid genera, where structural and colour mimicry are 
combined, we are at least dealing with members of a single 
family, however distinct the genera themselves may be. 

All the species of Paralastor from Tasmania that I have myself 
seen, are extremely similar in appearance, with nearly white 
markings and two very narrow abdominal bands. Odynerus of 
quite similar appearance were taken with these by Mr. R. E. 
Turner last year. 

In N. Queensland, P. optabilis, which has a coloration entirely 
unlike any other Queensland species of its genus, is mark for 
mark the same as an Odynerus occurring with it, and both have 
similar structural peculiarities. 

At Adelaide in 8. Australia and in Victoria are numerous 
species with deep dull orange or red markings, superficially either 
entirely or nearly resembling one another, though falling into 
the most diverse structural groups. These species seem to vary 
in their patterns individually, and it would appear that different 
species exhibit similar variations of pattern. 

Orange-marked species (though found elsewhere) are abundant 
in Queensland, while W. Australia has a very distinct colour- 
group, the thorax of the species being largely red, and the basal 
abdominal segment similarly coloured, while the rest is black. It 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 565 


is interesting to note that the four members of this last colour- 
group that are at present known fall each in a totally different 
group structurally. Of course, W. Australia has species other- 
wise coloured, which resemble those from other parts of the 
country. 

North Queensland has a number of species remarkable for the 
ornamentation being nearly confined to the large 2nd abdominal 
segment, the pattern of this being very distinctive, sometimes 
ferruginous, sometimes yellow or nearly white. 

It is evident that many and perhaps most of the species exhibit 
considerable variety in colour or pattern of colour, as also in 
smaller details of structure, but to what extent this is the ease, 
whether as regards individuals from one station or those from 
separate localities, the material at my disposal is far too limited 
to decide. This material consists of the British Museum Collec- 
tion, excluding the actual types of Saussure and Smith (most of 
which, however, I have examined), of the collection in the Hope 
Department of Zoology in the Oxford Museum, including types, 
and of my own collection. The total number of specimens is 
only 333, although 2000 or more would hardly be adequate for 
dealing with the genus satisfactorily. Moreover, as six species 
together account for 101 of the 333 examples, it will be seen that 
about 90 species are represented very poorly indeed. There is 
no doubt that great numbers of species and local forms remain 
to be discovered, and the genus will ultimately prove to be very 
difficult. Even at present the species are not at all easy, com- 
pared with the Hawaiian Odynerus, which about equal them in 
number. 

A great deal of the material in the British Museum and at 
Oxford is very old and often dirty, and has, further, been badly 
mishandled in the desire to extend the wings. 

In Alastor, Odynerus, and kindred genera, the abdomen should 
always be kept flat on the ventral surface, and not bent at the 
suture between the first and second abdominal segments, as is often 
the case. It should, however, be bent downwards at the petiolar 
articulation, so as to fully expose the propodeum. If properly 
mounted in this way, the base of the second ventral segment will 
be fully exposed and the structure of the segment readily observ- 
able. Tio anyone who has handled many hundreds of species of 
Kumenidz, proper preparation of the specimens is of minor con- 
sideration, as he will easily make allowance for the retraction or 
flexure of the second ventral segment, but to one not so circum- 
stanced, the difference in appearance caused by poor preparation 
may be a source of serious error. 

Two species which I have described on single specimens have 
not the neuration of Paralastor, but of Odynerus, the second 
cubital cell not being petiolate. Whether they are constant in 
this character or not, remains to be proved. It isin any casea 
very feeble one, for in some species the petiole of the cell is very 
much reduced, so that it was quite certain that sometimes, either 


566 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


as a variation or as a specific character, it would be altogether 
wanting. The importance placed on small differences in neura- 
tion in Hymenoptera has been much overrated, and there is little 
to commend these characters, excepting the fact that they are 
obvious at a glance. 

Some described species it is impossible for me to tabulate, as I 
have never seen specimens of them, and the descriptions, admir- 
able as Saussure’s are in general, omit certain important points. 
Some, not included in the tables, I have referred to subsequently 
with regard to their probable position. .The following may be 
brietly mentioned here :— 


P. albifrons Fabr. If the tegule have a coarse, deep, and con- 
spicuous puneturation, this species would appear to be 
extremely closely allied to P. habilis and subhabilis, but 
superficially distinct by having only ‘“‘ deux trés petits points 
orangés sur le prothorax” and the apical band of the 2nd 
abdominal segment semicireularly emarginate, the emargina- 
tion being much deeper in the other two. 

P. australis Sauss. This would fall in my table in the group of 
P. princeps, oloris, ete. If Saussure’s specimen was correctly 
stated to be a female, the yellow clypeus and front of the scape 
of the antennz would distinguish it from the females known 
to me, which resemble it otherwise in colour, as well as the 
spot on the mesopleura from either males or females of this 
section. 

P. clotho Lep. I know no species with this pattern, except 
Alastor unifasciatus Sm., which lacks the scutellar spots, has 
dark tegule and very dark wings with violet iridescence, 
and is not an Australian species. 

P. cruentatus Sauss. I think it is impossible to identify this 
species without seeing the type. 

P. flaviceps Sauss. I have included this in my table where it 
would appear to belong. If the tegule are coarsely pune- 
tured it is correctly placed. In any case it is distinct 
superficially from all the species which have an entirely 
black basal segment by the sulphur-yellow head with a black 
oval mark on the vertex, enclosing the ocelli. 

P. graefei Sauss. This species from Ovalau is unknown to me 
and not included in my table. 

P. lachesis Sauss. Not included in my table, as the sculpture of 
the tegule is not indicated in the description. Superficially 
it resembles P. orientalis P. 

P. lateritius Sauss. I suspect this of being a slight colour-variety 
of P. carinatus Sm. 

P. nautarum Sauss. Probably tabulated rightly; as it is one 
of the species with “un tubercle saillant en dessous du 
deuxiéme segment,” an emarginate clypeus, and the abdo- 
men all black, except the orange basal segment, it cannot be 
confused with any other known to me. 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 567 


P. smithi Sauss. I unfortunately failed to examine the type of 
this species, which is in the British Museum, and I cannot 
place it in my tables from the-description nor identify it 
with any of those described by me. 

P. hirtiventris Cameron. IhaveseenCameron’s ¢ type. Itisthe 
largest species of the genus, the tibie with long conspicuous 
hairs beneath. The second ventral segment is greatly raised 
behind the suleature, prominent at the top of the truncation 
medially, and clothed with long erect hairs all over, the 
following segments densely hairy. The thorax is all black, 
the 1st and 2nd abdominal segments with wide orange apical 
bands clothed very conspicuously with erect hairs. 


T have to thank the authorities of the British Museum for the 
loan of their specimens for description. Several of these bore 
type-labels of Saussure’s, but the species were not deseribed by 
him. I have, except in one instance, adopted the names applied 
by him to these species. Prof. E. B. Poulton very kindly sent 
me the whole of the Hope Museum collection of this genus. 
To Mr. Meade-Waldo I am particularly indebted for examining 
special structures in some of the British Museum type-specimens, 
which I had overlooked in the limited time at my disposal there, 
and for sending me descriptions of some others which I needed 
to complete this paper. 

In the following descriptions the measurements are always 
taken from the front of the head to the apical margin of the 
2nd abdominal segment. 

In my description of the 2nd ventral segment I use the adjec- 
tive “elevatus” as applied to the part which lies behind the 
transverse sulcus, because it is convenient and natural to reverse 
the insect in examining this segment. Of course in reality the 
segment is not raised, but produced downwards behind the 
sulcus. 

When a species is contained in more than one of the three 
collections examined by me, the actual type-specimen has always 
been selected from the British Museum Collection. 


The genus Paralastor may be divided into two main sections, 
one of which contains by far the greater number of species and 
exhibits by far the greater variety of structure. The species of 
the small division (the Divisio secunda of the following table) 
may be characterized as follows :— 

Species semper graciliformes ; segmentum primum abdominale 
conspicue parvum, nunquam fortissime transversum, sed sub- 
campanuliforme, secundo semper, basim versus, utrinque con- 
spicue angustato. Segmentum 2 dorsale basim versus fortissime 
convexum, ita ut semper (a latere visum) supra segmentum 
basale fortiter aut fortissime elevatum appareat; secundum 
ventrale, insecto resupinato, post suleum suum transversum 
semper supra partem suam basalem (sive presulcalem) fortissime 


568 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


oblique elevatum, elevatione summa media nunquam antice pro- 
ducta aut tuberculiformi. Propodeum (excepto P. picteti, cujus 
propodeum nigrum est, abdominis segmento primo rufo, postice 
pallide-marginato) colore signatum. 

There is no absolute discontinuity between the two sections, 
and one or two species I have placed in both tables. For the 
most part, however, the insects of either group are separable at 
a glance by the characters above given, and since the one or 
two dubious forms are included in both tables, I do not think 
there can be the least difficulty in placing any of the known 


forms. 
It is clearly the small size of the basal segment that gives the 


species in the second division their characteristic superficial 
appearance, and by this also their resemblance to some of the 
small Australian species of /caria is made much more perfect. 

Ali species that have not the above characters are necessarily 
referable to the Divisio prima. 


Divisio prima. 


Thorax, pronoto excepto, semper totus niger ; abdominis seg- 
mentum basale aut totum nigrum, aut linea aut fascia 
subabbreviata, hand ad angulos ipsos laterales extensa, sed 
ante hos evanescente, decoratum. 

(Clypeus semper emarginatus, et abdominis segmentum 
2 dorsale basim yersus haud conspicue convexim 
elevabum))...2%os-aeae wh atesiaecms pocaces toe ea eda oe eee eee 1 

Thorax spe aliter decoratus ; segmentum abdominis basale 
nunquam totum nigrum, sed fascia apicali integra, aut non- 
nullis in speciebus ex majore parte colore ornatum ............ 16 

1. Ale anteriores tot, aut fere totw, nigricantes aut profunde 
infumatz et conspicue ubique cruleo-nitentes; clypeus 
utrinque carina longa, bene exstante, ad aut post medium 
extensa, haud munitus. 

(Abdominis segmentum primum totum nigrum) ............ 2 

Alz anteriores in A. wnifasciato Sm. solo ubique violaceo- 
nitentes, quo in casu carinis longis, post medium extensis, 
Glypeusestprseditus, 136: 2ie tac as on une eit ee eee oe ee 4 

2. Abdominis segmentum 2 rufo-brunneum aut brunneo-auranti- 
acum, triangulo elongato, nigro, mediano, a basi post 
medium segmentum extenso, ornatum ............... saussuret, Sp. Nn. 

Abdominis segmentum 2 nigrum, fascia apicali flava, rufescente, 
aut aurantiaca, haud basim suam utrinque attingente, 


GUI HULA ee fe gae toe aca ONCE er eters MeCN CP OE he 3 
3. Femora, trochanteres et tibie nigra; fascia segmenti 2 ab- ~ 
dominalis antice emargimata ..................0..00.00s infernalis Sauss. 
Femora, trochanteres et tibie rufescentia; fascia segmenti 
2 abdominalis angusta, perpaullo utrinque latior... rufipes, sp. n. 
4, Clypeus fortissime emarginatus, emarginatione, ac semicirculus, 
zeque profunda, aut etiam hoc profundiore ..................... 5 
Clypeus haud profundissime emarginatus, emarginatione arcum, 
Semi(cireul OMMINOLeMestOrmanle eee teee eee eee eee aan eee a 


5. Ale anteriores et posteriores fere squaliter profunde in- 
fuscatze (parte costali nigriore); abdominis segmentum 
2 totum rufo-brunneum, aut brunneo-aurantiacum, margine 
postico primi angustissime, in parte media, cum secundo 
CONCOLOLE Brena in meee Se ene yas See eae Fraternus Sauss. 


10. 


Il 


12. 


13. 


14. 


15. 
16. 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 569 


Alz haud distincte ubique fortiter infumate, sed ex magna 
parte hyaline aut subhyalinz ; abdominis segmentum secun- 
dum s#pius nigro aut fusco colore variegatum ; si unicolor 
est, margo segmenti primi posterior haud coloratus ......... 6 
Abdominis segmentum 2 ad apicem suum sat late nigrum, 
parte basali (triangulo mediano parvo excepto) colore albo- 
flavo ornata, fasciam, profunde angulariter postice excisam, 
POWMAMLC MRR estes eect ee eet meh eee Ce sinc Secs conspicuus, sp. Nn. 
Abdominis segmentum 2 totum pallidum, aut macula nigra aut 
fusca elongata mediana, nonnunquam marginem basalem, 
nonnunquam apicalem attingente, ornatum, picturatione 
variabili ; color segmenti, ut apparet, testaceo-flavus, aut 
pallide ferrugineus (an post mortem discolor?) ... duwbiosws, sp. n. 
Stigma alarum nigrum aut atro-brunneum; tegule minu- 
tissime punctate, nonnunquam in disco puncta pauca 
grossiora ferentes, aut plus minusve leves, et parce obso- 
letim punctate; clypeus aut duabus carinis longis, bene 
elevatis, conspicue instructus, aut obscurius tricarinatus ... 8 
Stigma alarum pallidum ; tegule grossissime et conspicue, seepe 
rugosim, punctate ; clypeus carina utrinque conspicua, bene 
elevata, carens (deflexione tamen clypei laterum marginem 
acutum nonnunquam formante) nec obscurius tricarinatum . 13 


. Alz anteriores et posteriores atro-infuscate ; abdominis seg- 


mentum 2 dorsale totum ferrugineum, aut nigrum fascia 

apicali flava aut aurantiaca ornatum ........................ 20.205 g) 
Ale haud atrz, anteriores sole in parte costali atro-infus- 

cate, ceteris partibus hyalinis aut leviter infumatis ; 

abdominis segmentum secundum aliter picturatum ............ 10 
Alz haud vyiolaceo-colore conspicue nitentes ; segmentum 

abdominis 2 dorsale totum ferrugineum aut opace auran- 

LOLOL HIG Gena bobh lane oannee Seem oe a NDOG Soe SOR RCE oR Cente Ses cognatus Sm. 
Alze conspicue violaceo-nitentes; segmentum abdominis 2 

dorsale fascia apicali tantum ornatum ............... unifasciatus Sm. 
Clypeus utrinque fortiter longitudinaliter carinatus, carinis 

foxutiterrenacupese! evabisn CO) espe beet eee tee erence tee 11 
Clypeus obscure longitudinaliter tricarinatus, inter carinam 

medianam et laterales depressus, apice leviter emarginato 

avixed 1 LOMUDALOR (om) Peneeer ert ceteris orate pincers sence seers 12 
Abdominis segmentum secundum fascia basali, latissima, 

pallide flava, postice late emarginata, ornatum ... conspiviendus,sp.n. 
Abdominis segmentum 2 pallide flavum, plagam magnam sub- 

triangularem nigram includens ........................ elegans, sp. Nn. 
Segmentum 2 dorsale abdominis subsanguineum, plaga basali 

nigra (haud ad segmentum medium extensa) notatum ; seg- 

mentum primum spatio lunulato ejusdem coloris apicali 

CIBACHEIEAY onan was bb nae nae SoBe eaws on bene SAG Re Ere ens tricarinulatus, sp. n. 
Abdominis segmentum 2 dorsale ferrugineum aut aurantiacum, 

totum pallidum, triangulo basali nigro et brevi excepto. 

tasmaniensis Sauss. 

Abdominis segmentum 2 dorsale plaga nigra mediana, a basi 

ad medium aut post medium extensa, ornatum ............... 14 
Caput sulphureo-flavum, ocellis plaga nigra ovali circumdatis. 

flaviceps Sauss. 

Caput nigrum, macula utrinque postoculari, et macula inter- 


EAT RETAIN, MORIAH o" Aad alee bab beaameuc sueece Sone SEA RR OS SeLeGne eRe MeeS 15 
Ad brayesipil es) Tauivaranteehentt 8 ote a dei fan Ae ead on Poe habilis, sp. n. 
Tegularum margo exterior pallidus ..................... subhabilis, sp. 1. 
Thorax totus niger; abdominis segmenta 2 basalia tota 

Hern cinea ene dat nay vale occ Daa Cais Ree Sar apicatus Sm. 


SOOGIES milter GOlkorna. 65 Suk ke nhs ete ee ee SES e Nee PARC See sunelee 17 


570 DR. R. GC. L. PERKINS ON THE 


17. Abdominis segmentum 2 dorsale pallide flavum, aut ochraceum, 
macula nigra basali triangulari ornatum, apice trianguli nigri 
fere ad medium segmentum extenso, segmentis sequentibus 
et margine primi posteriore cum secundo fere concoloribus ; 
thorax niger, pronoto solo maculis flavescentibus ornato. 
pallidus, sp. n. 
Species colore precedenti valde dissimiles .....................-.. 18 
18. Pronotum, scutellum fere totum, postscutellum, tegule, cum 
propodei lateribus, ochraceo-flava ; abdominis segmentum 
primum eotlem fere colore fasciatum, fascia media quadrato- 
emarginata ; secundum nigrum, apice vix pallescente (¢). 
insularis Sauss. 
Species colore preecedenti valde dissimiles ........................ 19 
19. Abdominis segmentum 2 ventrale post suleum suum trans- 
versum in parte media peroblique aut convexim elevatum, 
et ibidem hand aut vix ad altitudinem, quam pars sua basalis, 
majorem surgens ; clypeus emarginatus ....................00.: 85 
Abdominis segmentum 2 ventrale post suleum suum trans- 
versum in parte media sepissime fortissime (aut saltem 
distincte) supra partem suam basalem elevatum ; aut si pars 
postsulealis partem przesulealem (sive basalem) altitudine 
haud superat, a suleco sat abrupte surgit pars posterior, et 
clypeus “troncabus estore crass oe nconale ian eaeec cin ae eee 20 
20, Abdominis segmentum 2 ventrale, post sulenm suum trans- 
versum, tantum ad partis basalis sue altitudinem elevyatum ; 
clypets Semper pcm ea iis paeeer a eee te ene 81 
Abdominis segmentum 2 ventrale, post suleum suum trans- 
versum, sepius fortissime supra partem suam basalem 
elevatum, aut semper distincte altius quam pars basalis ... 21 
21. Clypeus (lateribus deflexis exceptis) usque ad basim perfecte 
deplanatus (nee concayus sive impressus) et parti frontis 
Interantennali deplanatze, quam perfectissime, adaptatus ; 
postscutellim: simplex, imerme ..........-.......+.)-)s)sesee eee 70 
Clypeus basin versus aut ubique plus minusve conyexus aut 
rare impressus ; si usque ad basim deplanatus, postscutellum 
medium tuberculatum aut spiniferum est ........................ 22 


22. Clypeus sat fortiter emarginatus, et nonnullis in aspectibus 
paullo inter dentes laterales prominens, ita ut, plus minusve 
obscure, quasi tridentatus appareat ...............0.cc0c0eeee eee 63 

Clypeuspaliten Porm aus eee esses ree eee none eee 23 

23. Clypeus carinis acutis duabus elongatis longitudinalibus, bene 

exstantibus sporceci hte. qe.) noe ee 62 
Clypeus haud ita carinatus, sed margines deflexi laterales 
nonnunquam aciem acutam formant .............................. 24 

24. Postscutellum medium spina brevi aut tuberculo distincte 

acre Tih 1s peel ae Se a ated HMI ee EES Gl 65 
Wostscutellam)/inerme | 7:0..04..4....10..2ccersoe ca 25 


25. Tegule perconspicue grosse punctate, marginem versus 


exteriorem puncta hee grossa ferentes; clypeus semper 
@marcing DUS eberter ast eats) h nt ee acl a ieee ae 52 


Tegule sepe minutissime punctate ex parte majore, aut fere 
leeves, puncta majora marginem exteriorem versus conspicua 


rare ferentes, quo in casu clypeus truncatus est ............... 26 
26. Abdominis segmentum 2 dorsale in formam conicam fortissime 
et abrupte (oblique tamen) elevatum ; clypeus truncatus ... 79 


Abdominis segmentum 2 dorsale nonnunquam fortiter convexim 


elevatum, sed haud vere conico-tuberculatum, aut si conicum, 
el ypeustesbemancina busses stick te yea 27 


27. Abdomen fasciis unicoloribus duabus (una in specie compluribus) 
flavis, seepissime albido-flavis, rarius lete flayis, ornatum ; 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 7 Il 


fascia prima plerumque lineari, rarissime circiter partem 

segmenti dimidiam, desuper aspecta, occupante; fascia 

secunda haud majorem quam quintam partem segmenti 

secundi occupante; pronoto antice bimaculato, maculis a 

tegulis longissime remotis, propodeo nigro ..................... 28 
Abdomen aut aurantiaco, aut rufescente colore fasciatum ; aut 

fascia una aut altera aut ambabus distinctissime bicoloratis ; 

nonnullis in speciebus segmentum primum, desuper aspectum, 

totum aut fere totum est coloratum, propodeo nonnunquam 

haud toto nigro, maculis pronotalibus nonnunquam ad 


tegulas aut fere ad tegulas extensis ..................0...0000005. 34 a 
28. Species duabus fasciis abdominalibus ornate ..................... 29 
Species unica, fasciis compluribus albido-flavis ornata ......... 33 


29. Mesonotum in parte dimidia posteriore aut grosse aut densim 
et rugose punctatum; frons inter antennas maculata ; 
antenn ey cail-arhiculatcom eee nner ena nee eee nee 30 
Mesonotum in parte pesteriore haud grosse punctatum, punctis 
inter se remotioribus aut irregulariter dispositis ; frons inter 
antennas nigra; antenne ¢ 12-articulate ..................... 34 
Aneguli laterales pronoti anteriores distincti, evidenter pro- 
minuli; mesonotum opacum, et cum scutello ubique quam 
densissime rugoso-punctatum. (Tegule flavo-marginatz.) 
: emarginatus Sauss. 
Anguli laterales pronoti anteriores parum distincti, haud 
promimentes ; mesonoti puncturatio minus densa quam in 
precedente, punctis (nonnullis in partibus) imter se 
GIS GIT CTI SMe reece teN ene eae ee ere mace cans Ae een Ry 31 
31. Tegule, ex magna parte aut tote, testacez, haud flavo-notate ; 
abdominis seementum primum postice angustissime lineariter 
fasciato, fascia ipsa haud vel sparsissime punctata. 

(Abdomen in exemplis recentibus pilis longis ubique 
vestitum; dG segmentum ventrale apicale pilis sat 
longis erectis vestitum; ad basim suam utrinque 
pilis densis erectis preditum, his seepe sub segmento 
preecedenteraloditis)hoesete eee oeece eset esete parca Sauss. 

Tegule sepe flavo-maculate ; abdominis segmentum primum 
postice minus anguste fasciatum, fascia ipsa punctis multis 
Conspicuegora ditay eine seas ees tee eee eee creer tien ae eens 32 

32. Abdominis segmentum tertium et sequentia (a latere visa) 
pilis erectis parce vestita; fascia flava segmenti primi 
antice media emarginata;. dG segmentum ventrale ab- 
dominis apicale pilis erectis sat longis vestitum; Q 
THAN GKOYER INI 2) > = hrs BOA Se BNR At Maa ae aoSiatanoL eee Se seace Pee sp. n. 

Abdominis segmentum tertium et sequentia solum tomentosa ; 
fascia flava primi haud antice emarginata; ¢ segmentum 
ventrale abdominis apicale pilis brevissimis vestitum ; 

(OV ST TGOP AINE) ieee deta bedaoSE Dae Gomes saree CBNoRpeT TESMeDROR ee frater, sp. n. 
33. Clypeus leviter lateque emarginatus, albo-flavus, macula 
mediana nigro-signata ; mesonotum dense distincteque 
punctatum, tegulis externe testaceis, postice flayo-notatis ; 
alee parum fortiter infuscate (Q) ..................... ordinarius, sp. 1. 
34. Abdomen fasciis duabus angustissimis flavo-albis; corpus 
totum pilis longis vestitum, forma graciliore; tegule fere 
nigre ; abdominis segmentum primum haud fortissime 
transversum; clypeus aut truncatus aut vix evidenter 


30 


emarginatus; antenne J 12-articulate ............ punctulatus Sauss. 
34a. Clypeus fortiter aut fortissime, levissime aut leviter emar- 
Sinatiis, emMaroinatusbalMenm lates stetdsvooe en svedeescese eee. 35 
Clypeus aut recte aut subrotundatim truncatus .................. 73 


Proc. Zoo. Soc.—1914, No. XL. 40 


ie DR. R. GC. L. PERKINS ON THE 


35. Abdominis segmentum 2 dorsale (lateraliter visum) pilis longi- 
oribus erectis, sat numerosis, conspicue vestitum ; pronotum 
antice binotatum, propodeo nigro, puncturatione mesonotali 
confusa, leviter impressa. (Tegule testacee ; anguli pronoti 
humerales parum distincti.) 

Abdominis segmentum secundum pilis brevibus erectis sparsim 
vestitum, aut fere nudum ; pronotum nonnullarum specierum 
ad tegulas aut longe has versus coloratum ; propodeo non- 
inillempunal CoM KorysySitereR HNO) moor epee enie cr sca ts-nae) 1ecbosdecoctacsda: 

36. Abdominis segmentum primum fascia distincte picolerate 
semper ornatum, fascize margine anteriore haud aut vix 
emarginato 

Abdominis segmentum primum fascia sepissime fere unicolore 
ornatum, fascia ipsa, quam precedentis, semper latiore, et 
antice conspicue emarginata 

37. Abdominis segmentum secundum nigrum, haud fasciatum 

Abdominis segmentum secundum fascia colorata ornatum ...... 

38. Abdominis seementum primum et secundum (aut ex his unum) 
fascia distincte bicolorata ornata, aut segmentum primum, 
desuper aspectum, fere totum rubricolor est, margine postico 
FEAR) pete coh cress sizpad sais Slee Nae See HEE Swe EL AR Ete dO Talal eae ah 

Abdominis nec segmentum primum nec secundum coloribus 
CUObUSmVAT eo aban, ms seeasteesacaee neeem ineeaceh apres aa tes Bee re ent 

39. Anguli humerales pronoti anteriores distincte prominentes. 

(Tegularum margo exterior albidus aut flavescens; tibia 
posteriores ferruginez aut rufescentes, macula elongata 
i lors Ehohereteh on) lone nbeemeden comaner aac nuacaantacoue ie simulator, 

Anguli humerales pronoti anteriores aut fere recti aut obtusi, 

had: produto. citessiige casio mere Se sanodt snide pekese tas eee Re Ean 

Tegule nitidissime, perpolite ; parte interiore excepta, levis- 

simee, haud) subtilissime punctate .......sscssseces+ ee. sceeeenetes 

Teeule in parte exteriore subtilissime punctulate ............... 

41, Clypeus Q levis, nitidus, glaber, distincte, remote punctatus ; 
teeule (ex magna parte) flavescentes aut albide ; mesopleura 
maculata ; tibiz intermedi et postice longe albido-maculatez, 
tarsis rufescentibus. 

¢ tibiis omnibus, metatarsisque intermediis et posterioribus 
Supca, allie! vtec near e nae eanen cece eRe eee 

Clypeus 2 conspicue minute pubescens, apice (quodam in 
aspectu) elevato, grossius subdensim punctatus ; tegulze 
nigricantes; mesopleura nigra; tibie posteriores albido- 
flavo notate, tarsis nigrescentibus. (¢ ignotus 

42. Abdominis segmentum primum, desuper visum, rubricolor, 
colore hoe antice nigro-emarginato, postice anguste flayo- 
marginato ; mesonotum profunde, zqualiter, sat grosse 
punctatum ; clypeus (Q) antice distincte marginatus. 


4.0 


tricolor, sp. 


43. Abdominis segmentum 2 dorsale valde fortiter a basi conico- 
elevatum ; hoc, cum primo, late fasciato, fascia prima partem 
segmenti (desuper aspecti) maximam occupante, antice tri- 
angulariter nigro-emarginata. Macule pronotales ab angulis 
posterioribus dorsalibus longe remote 


Abdominis segmentum secundum haud distincte conico- 
tuberculatum 


44, Pronotum usque ad angulos dorsales posteriores coloratum “8 
Macule pronotales a tegulis longe remoti.......................... 


45. Segmenta nonnulla abdominis apicalia, et dorsalia et ventralia, 
nigra BE RESO ROCIO TIA HOU EE oA CE ere ARH 


. Segmenta abdominalia omnia ‘colorata abies enlen Sepoe Bunnies s (aha 
46. Scutellum sat convexum, quam densissime rugoso-punctatum ; 
thorax post partem pronotalem niger (J); Q incognita. 


zerophilus, 


36 


37 


SEE er een Cee RE Sao a rere eee ser vulpinus Sauss. 


Rife stein aide ee ate vulpinus excisus, st. n. 


sp. 1. 


donatus, sp. 0, 


... despectus, sp. 0. 


nh. 


Sedo o eee ae roseotinclus, sp. 1. 


44, 
45 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 573 
Scutellum lave, parum convexum, haud densim ubique pune- 
tatum, punctis interstitialibus minutis distinctis ; scutellum, 
postscutellum et propodeum late aurantiaco-ornata __. placens, sp. n. 


47. Clypeus antice distinctissime marginatus ; species magna et 
TROVE, cesandeea es 3 
48. Pronotum haud aut indistincte marginatum ad truncationem 


(Picturatio abdominis segmenti 2 dorsalis pervariabilis, 
nonnunquam colore rufo aut rufo-aurantiaco fasciam 
apicalem tantum formante, nonnunquam totum seg- 
mentum, triangulo nigro basali excepto, occupante.) 


SOO PAUGADNOO Soc DUnaumoniaaooBnBenA care Eee eriurgus Sauss. 


argentifrons Sm. 


Abdominis seementum tertium et sequentia haud bene colorata, 
marginibus apicalibus tantum obscure pallidioribus. Clypeus 
3 haud marginatus, quam in precedente fortius emarginatus ; 
abdominis segmentum primum multo minus fortiter trans- 
versum, secundi fascia apicalis haud ant parum ampliata ; 


GRINGO CTU Awe ies Veale St ah ypim ek ateN tees ite ts subobscurus, sp. n. 


basim juxta inflexis 
52. Thorax (mesonoto nigro aut tantum bimaculato excepto) et 
Segmentum primum abdominale in aspectu dorsali ubique 


DoS ORa Dp aU NGO OAS TEAR MRE me pet ce aaa MIMUS, Sp. N. 


rufa aut aurantiaca, ceteris segmentis abdominalibus nigris. 53 
Species aliter colorate, abdominis segmento secundo semper 
CONGO CHOPIN oo cssccascoscabone: SpE OD aERtOLUAArs Dok URE OOS B ame Loe, 54. 
53. Species parva, angustula, colore rubro ornata, alis hyalinis, 
parte subcostali perpaullo infuscata .................. imuitator, sp. n. 


Species sat robusta, aurantiaco-decorata, alis infumatis, parte 
subcostali nigrescente ., 
54. Species, quarum propodeum nigrum est, pronoto antice macu- 


(Pronotum antice fere recte truncatum (sive levissime 
concavum), angulis lateralibus distinctis, bene elevato- 
marginatum ; clypeus levissime emarginatus ; abdominis 


segmentum secundum densissime, grosse et conspicue 


ape tsloUanal seanetet stellate a fer-velreistaepet state ee eee nautarum Sauss. 


Sys) 


59 


RO WITe Caytitanias)) pret cks-t eres ey ye en NS eal debilis, sp. n. 


' Abdominis segmentum secundum postice latissime rufo aut 
aurantiaco-rufo colore fasciatum, fascia utrinque valde 
ampliata, plus minus angulariter profunde (nonnunquam 
profundissime) nigro-emarginata, segmentis sequentibus 
coloratis 


57 


57. 


58. 


59. 


61. 


4 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


Abdominis segmentum secundum, margines versus laterales, 

distincte punctatum, scilicet punctis bene separatis ........ : 58 
Abdominis segmenti 2 dorsalis margo posterior (desuper 

inspectus) utrinque fortiter postice productus, angulis 

acutis prominentibus conspicue munitus (¢) ...... eugonias, Sp. Nn. 
Abdominis segmenti 2 dorsalis margo posterior utrinque dis- 

tincte angulatus, angulis ipsis per paullo prominentibus (9). 

microgonias, Sp. nl. 

Abdominis segmentum primum basisque secundi pulchre pubes- 

centia argentea utrinque ornata, propodei lateribus similiter 

vestitis; fascia abdominalis segmenti secundi ad, aut paullo 

ante, medium utrinque producta (q)).............-..-. argyrias, Sp. 1. 
Abdomen haud pubescentia argentea ornatum; fascia ab- 

dominalis segmenti 2 fere ad basim utrinqgue antice 

jorovolbventay (( ocosnsanacas asd shscoqeseuasoDisaeHaraoEnen iC euclidias, sp. n. 
Abdominis segmentum 2 ventrale fortissime post suleum supra 

partem basalem suam abrupte elevatum, truncatione summa 

antice subproducta et prominula, tuberculiformi ............... 60 
Abdominis segmentum 2 ventrale post suleum transversum 

distincte, sed haud fortissime, supra partem suam basalem 

elevatum, truncatione summa haud subangulatim antice 


PLoOductayet wUberculito nM | eee te ee ble pein ee sees eee neste 61 
Segmentum abdominale tertium cum sequentibus nigrum ; 

SOROS! MNES (EH) cn canconeoasdgnantoussencondadoo coos occidentalis, sp. n. 
Seementum tertium et sequentia aurantiaco-ornata ; species 

magnitudine mediocris (gf Q).......-.....20-e0e es .... orientalis, sp. n. 


Abdominis segmentum 2 ventrale nigrum, postice aurantiaco- 

marginatum, post truncationem leviter impressum (<j). 

solitarius, sp. N. 

Abdominis segmentum 2 ventrale colore flavo et rufo-brunneo 

ornatum, nulla parte nigra, post truncationem valde late 

depressum, ita ut truneatio summa incrassationem elevatam, 

plerumque curvatam, prabeat (d)...............-..... hilaris, sp. n. 
Thorax, pronoto excepto, niger; abdominis segmentum secun- 

dum dorsale flavum, colore flayvo maculam magnam nigram 

subtriangularem includente. Postscatellum tubereulatum. 

maculiventris Sauss. 

Thoracis pars post-pronotalis flavo-maculata ; abdominis seg- 

mentum 2 nigrum, postice flavo-fasciatum, fascia nonnunquam 

utrinque fortiter basim versus producta ; postscutellum 

lidteperoasy he SARA A, Ot se eee el eR TT mare cia a Sth oe bicarinatus, sp. n. 


. Abdomen fasciis 2 abdominalibus flavis aut sulphureis, an- 


gustis, haudyuaquam dilatatis, tantum ornatum ; pronotum 
antice et scutellum maculis duabus, pallide flavis, ornata. 
(Amitennee U2 -articulatess))) eee eee eee eee eee optabilis, sp. n. 
Picturatio cum colore valde diversa .............. Hiei aes an emis 64 


, Alee atree, ubique (in quodam aspectu) violaceo-tinctee ; ab- 


dominis segmentum 2 latissime fasciatum, fascia antice 

angulato-emarginata. Thorax exempli unici totus niger, 

postsecutello. tuberculo debili munito (Q) ........... . atripennis, sp. n. 
Ale fusco-nitentes (subasneo-micantes); abdominis segmen- 

tum 2 fascia apicali aurantiaca, fere simplici, ornatum ; 

thorax, mesonoto excepto, ubique aurantiaco-ornatus, post- 

scutello hand tuberculato (QO) 0... ee. eee teen e ees awreocinctus Guér. 


. Clypeus profundissime emarginatus, emarginatione multo, quam 


semicirculus, profundiore, dentem utrinque longum et ob- 

WUHAN, WOMTEAAIE. ” Gorictneopnesaneen sacs Eesti AL nce ieee a, meine 5 69 
Clypeus haud ita emarginatus ................. SNe cit aN ae Fe 66 
Thorax (mesonoto excepto) ubique rubro-decoratus ; abdominis 

segmentum primum rubrum, basali parte nigra, segmentis 

ceeteris nigris........ bai decinaiea dent ee ap reat s---svene entiger, Sp, n. 
Species a preecedente colore valde diverse ........................ 


67. 


68 


69. 


70 


Tile 


72, 


73. 


76, 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 


Species aurantiaco-ornatus ; scutellum macula magna trans- 
versa, vix aut haud divisa, ornatum(d) ............ infimus, Sp. Ds 
Species una aurantiaco-ornata, altera colore flaviore, vix 
aurantiaco, decorata; scutellum maculis duabus, late 
SCOMUTTILAISL,,Onpatranany (lO) ek ae, See cee ee ora oe eee a 
Fascia abdominalis prima fere simplex, lata; secunda late 
emarginata, latera versus ante medium segmentum basim 
versus producta ; propodeum nigrum (Q)............ sUMMUS, SP. D; 
Fascia abdominalis prima antice conspicue emarginata ; 
secunda fere simplex, latera versus perpaullo ampliata (Q). 
mredius, sp. n. 
Mesonotum solum nigrum, partibus ceeteris thoracis dorsalibus 
aurantiaco - decoratis; abdcminis segmentum secundum 
fascia apicali, vyix aut perpaullo latera versus dilatata, 
ORTIA LUM re nC PREECE LO horn ee. ORM ORV Cn Une eustomus, Sp, n. 
Thorax totus, duabus maculis pronotalibus exceptis, niger ; 
abdominis Bepmontom 2 fascia latissima, antice emarginata, 
utringue ante medium segmentum producta, ornatum (@). 


68 


pseudochromats, sp. 


Clypeus profundissime emarginatus, emarginatione semicir- 
culum formante, aut semicirculo profundiore ; frons capitis 
OUGUITAT Lay os yn tear ee PEON gn pace ene ain ETADAS TOPS AN SEE 6) Os 

Clypeus late, leviter emarginatus ; frons capitis duabus lineis 
leevibus, ammetas et elevatis, conspicue munita ........ 72 

Species parva, sed sat robusta ; abdominis segmentum 2 dorsale 
fascia, utrinque valde anmyelhinge, ornatum ; pronotum solum 
maculatum, thoracis partibus ceteris nigris (Q ), 

(Clypeus colore variabilis, aut totus niger aut rufo- 
AMACHIAUISS hare veeiet rycen cia aang eae 

Species magnitudine mediocris; abdominis segmentum secun- 
dum, cum sequentibus, nigrum ; thorax, mesonoto excepto, 
TEPER OVA Mey AVIS CO) )) eaeses Se cel ARAE ona a ori ares eee Miers fallax, sp. n, 

Species aurantiaco-ornata; abdominis segmentum primum 
fascia lata aurantiaca, haud aut vyix emarginata, ornatum ; 
scutellum, margine posteriore excepto, aurantiacum (@ ). 


nN. 


vulneratus Sauss, 


brisbanensis, €p, ns 


Species flavo-ornata; vix aurantiaca; abdominis segmentum 
primum fascia flayescente, antice conspicue emarginata, 
ornatum; scutellum maculis duabus, bene  separatis, 
Sigma human VON eur ten aay oma ee met oar Peay OB 

Species maxima (14-15 mm. ad apicem seg. 2 abdominalis) ; 
abdominis segmentis 2 basalibus aurantiaco-fasciatis, fasciis 
haud latis, secunda simplici, hand aut vix latera versus dila- 
tata, segmentis sequentibus nigris. Tibiee nigre ; posteriores 
macula rufa aut flava signatee; intermedie et posteriores 


(nisi attritz) pilis longis sparsim vestitee ............ princeps, sp. n, 
Species aut preecedente multo minores, aut colore dissimiles ,.. 74 
Segmenta 2 basalia abdominis fasciata, ceeteris nigris ; species 

graciles plus minusve paralleliformes ........................--. 75 
Segmenta abdominis complura aut omnia colorata; species 

77 


adeer act OSpane etre a centr enue ey aioe: ents eke sane ta semasle ae 
Pronotum colore rufo fere ad tegulas decoratum ; clypeus 9 
UO MAC Ul aye Aen eR aa erat Sher a eee eee commutatus, sp. 
Pronotum aut nigrum aut maculis parvis duabus aurantiacis 
ab ronSsvormatum~siclypeus O)miger ..)- 622.6 )-5s- ok. esse: 7 
G abdominis segmenta 5 apicalia pilis erectis sat conspicue 
vestita; tibiz utriusque sexus nigra, basi et apice nonnun- 
quam pallescentibus, 
(oi Ghyaswes tikyares, ©) amiensie)) 4) oaubuoccna-neceeanees suboloris, sp. n. 
d abdominis segmenta apicalia pubescentia minuta depressa _ 


tantum vestita; tibie omnes cum tarsis rufescentes. 
oloris, KP. D. 


mackayensis, ep. 


Nn, 


n. 


576 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


le heh Claes) THENTUG) sa6.cnbocoreescocose soa sepconstss Oe ane ear a 78 
© @ Clypeus totus, aut ex parte magna, niger ..... pasH a cooeads 80 
78. Clypeus in parte sua media longitudinaliter impressus, utrinque 
carinis subobsoletis (rotundatis nec acute eleyatis) parallelis 
instructus ; antennze (ut opinor) tantum 10-articulate, 
articulis 2 apicalibus minutissimis. Cellula 2 eubitalis 
haud petiolata (an semper?) Segmentum abdominis ven- 
traley fasab fOrbiber COMVEXUMD =o... tesa. dasisee sar = -ls odyneroides, sp. Tt. 
Clypeus more solito formatus, convexus ; antennze 12-articu- 
latee,fortiter clavate, articulis 4 ultimis parvis sed distinctis ; 
segmentum abdominis ventrale 7 deplanatum. 

(Abdominis seementum 2 dorsale fortiter elevatum pilis- 

que longis erectis vestitum.) ..................64 viduus, Sp. Te 
79, Abdomen fasciis duabus, hand utrinqgue ampliatis, ornatum, 
prima angustissima, secunda haud lata; clypeus utrinque 
longitudinaliter flavescens aut albido-flavus. Abdominis 
segmentum 2 dorsale pilis erectis longioribus vestitum. { 
: tuberculutus Sauss. 
80. Tibis tarsique rufescentes ; cellula 2 cubitalis petiolata. 

(Color variabilis ; abdominis segmentum secundum late 
ferrugineo- aut aurantiaco-brunneo-fasciatum, fascia 
nonnunquam basim segmenti utrinque attingente.) 

carinatus Sm. (=lateritivs Sauss., var. ?} 
Tibise tarsique nigrescentes, his plus minusve atro-brunneis, 
articulis nonnullis testaceis ; tibize posteriores, basim versus, 
in parte interiore, rufescentes. Cellula 2 cubitalis hand 
petiolata (an semper ?). Segmenta abdominalia fasciis fer- 
rugineis aut brunneo-aurantiacis ornata, fasciis apicalibus, 
quam basales, pallidioribus. 
(Nescio quomodo sint variabiles picturatio et alarum 
THE UN EULOS)) Mag veeartas ae ne cee oe ava odyneripennts, sp. D. 
81. Abdominis segmentum primum fascia sat lata, unicolore, rnbra, 
antice angulariter nigro-emarginata, ornatum (Q)). mutabilis, sp. 1. 
Abdominis segmentum primum fascia flava, albido-flava, aut : 
flavo-aurantiaca anguste marginatum, aut fascia latiore, 


ConSplcuel bicolonaba, Gecone tind sare: eeniey ee seeeessieeee ames 82 
82. Abdominis segmentum primum fascia apicali unicolore 
OLcYe(oha7h nbbns Danener ony n Oaenoe eee eb Rana aM an Gaad anoeaPincconmadee 83 
Abdominis segmentum primum fascia conspicue bicolore 
ornatum. 


83. Mesopleura tegulas juxta seepe flavo-notata ; abdominis seg- 
mentum primum transversim parum evidenter depressum : 
species evidenter minor : 

a. Mesopleura flavo-notata, abdominis fascia (aut prima) 
pallide flavescentes aut albido-flave (Q). plebeiws, sp. n. 
b. Mesopleura haud notata ; abdominis fasciz-flavee... var. a. 
Mesopleura haud fiavo-notata ; abdominis segmentum primum 
transversim sat conspicue depressum; species evidenter 
major, fasciis abdominalibus aurantiaco-flavis, prima, quam 
in specie preecedente, latiore et sat copiose punctata ( Q ). 
subplebetus, sp. 1. 

84. Species parva, angusta; antennsee Q fortiter ¢ fortissime 
clavate, his 12-articulatis, articulis tribus apicalibus uncum 
[SRRETTENA TOWNE WONT OIS, co. ocnadesaeecocsaues suuncegsoson ee debilitatus, sp. 1. 

85. (Hac in sectione maris (ubi mas est cognitus) antennze tantum 
10-articulate sunt, articulis duabus apicalibus minimis, intra 
articulum octayum receptis.) 

Abdominis segmentum primum, parte nigra excepta, unicolor, 
aut flavum aut aurantiacum aut subrufum .................. We 87 
Abdominis segmentum primum, parte nigra basali (si colo 
niger adest) excepta, colore rufescente et flavo distincte 
COLOLADUNTMI MME a emma sae mats cranes enaaue ore oases eaten : 36 


86. 


87. 


88. 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. od 


Clypeus $ Q lete flavus; macula capitis ocellaris Q utrinque 
ad, aut fere ad antennarum insertionem utrinque producta. 
nvulticolor, sp. n. 
Clypeus 9 rufescens aut ferrugineus ; macula capitis ocellaris 
antice emarginata, parte utrinque producta ab insertione 
antennarum longe remota. G4 mihiincognitus... brwnnews Sauss. 
Abdominis segmentum secundum juxta apicem transversim 
impressum, ita ut incrassatio, distincte subelevata, formetur, 
incrassatione postice abrupte verticali, haud obliqua, mar- 
gine apicali deplanato lato. Color niger, rufo-decoratus (9 ). 
anostreptus, sp. n. 
Abdominis segmentum secundum juxta apicem plus minus 
incrassatum, incrassatione haud antice elevata, et postice 
plus minus oblique truncata; partes colorate plerumque 
aurantiace aut flave aut plus minus rufo-aurantiace......... 88 
Clypeus 9 aurantiaco-rufus ; oculi usque ad eclypeum colore 
marginati; maculi pronotales fere ad angulos dorsales 
posticos extensi; species nigra, rufo-ornata...... dyscritias, sp. 1. 
Clypeus 9 niger, lateribus deflexis flavescentibus, apice rufes- 
cent2; oculi haud usque ad clypeum marginati; pronotum 
antice maculis triangularibus ornatum ; species nigra, flavo- 


OIA IEDT As vanontas abies darter OBOSe OHO Mees cando aud saben wanthochromus, sp. 1. 


Divisio secunda. 


Thorax et abdomen bicolorata, nigra et rufa sive ferruginea ... 14 
Corpus nonnulla in parte semper flavo aut albido aut auran- 
tiaco-flavo colore ornatum, spe tricoloratum .................. 
Teeule (parte interiori thoracem juxta excepta) ex magna 
parte polite, impunctate aut fere impunctate, sculptura 
nulla aut vix videnda, puncta rare hic illic disposita non- 
TU TENA TELE TILE Supra ener eee GEV ee erst steal stettele ae res 3 
Tegulze plerumque subtilissime sed distinctissime in parte 
exteriori punctate, nonnunquam sat copiose et grosse 


12) 


punctate, aut puncta grossa et minuta intermixta ferentes... 8 
Abdominis segmentum primum supra rubens, margine postico 

LEWTO 2 [OOO IAM TUK 55 coc sey coasoucdvoomece picteti Sauss. 
Abdominis segmentum primum aliter coloratum; propodeo 

DY Coloration setters as t-ceeet ater ts ace pemeiermcte ne seme ere tea A 


Abdominis segmentum secundum postice fascia flavo-aurantiaca 
lata ornatum, partem, majorem quam quartam, segmenti 
occupante, ad basim utrinque conspicue aurantiaco- 
maculatum. 
(Clypeus truncatus aut parum emarginatus.). constrictius, sp. n. 
Abdominis segmentum secundum nonnunguam haud fasciatum, 
aut fascia pallide flava, aut obscuricolore ornatum ; si aur- 
antiaco-fasciatum, fascia minus lata est, haud quartam 
segmenti partem occupans. 
Color flavus superficiem totam posteriorem segmenti primi 
ocecupans, colore nigro, si adest, superficiem declivem solam 
OC CUP ATC Mees ie -1- Say ao ETT. SRE PRE rs eee 6 
Abdominis segmentum primum fascia apicali tantum ornatum. 7 
Tegule Q haud flavo-maculatx, feminz et maris punctis non- 
nullis grossioribus et profundioribus signatee ...  mesochlorus, sp. n. 
Tegule femine flavo-maculate, feminze et maris punctis minus 
grossis et profundis signatze ......... mesochlorws mesochloroides, st. N. 
Abdominis segmentum 2 ventrale medium haud impressum ; 
Q clypei apex late leviterque emarginatus ; mesonotum 
duabus lineis elongatis subparallelis ornatum; 3 incognitus. 
(Abdominis color atro-brunneus, segmentis fasciis albido- 
LIENS OMAN AMISY)) Danacomad adckad .geboctap ae qonnoAtn sods . darwinianus, sp. D. 


578 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


Abdominis segmentum 2 ventrale post sulcum transversum 
conspicue impressum, ita ut truneatio summa rotundatim 
elevatur (¢). 
(a) Thorax nigrum, flavo-notatum ............... comptus, sp. 1. 
(b) Pronotum rufum, flayo-notatum, mesonoto medio rufo. 
comptus, var. rwbescens, 1. 


8. Abdomen brunneum, rufo-brunneum aut atro-brunneum, et 


colore albido aut flavo-albido variegatum ......................-. uy 
Abdomen nigrum, colore sulphureo, flavo aut aurantiaco 
VLELE Deu bl pe yop eney yon. Ae ATU. coc s a SbUdide wistote ells asian oie 10 


9. Tegulz subtilissime ubique punctate ; puncta nonnulla majora 
sed levissime impressa adsunt; abdominis segmentum 2 dor- 

sale maculis basalibus carens. aut his minimis...... alecandriz, sp. n. 
Tegule subtilissime punctate et etiam punctis grossioribus, 
et, quam in precedente, majis conspicuis, signatze ; abdominis 
segmentum 2 dorsale maculis duabus, conspicuis, basalibus 


OUTA DDI erat ety ahah oee cs ac nvacelaeee nas ace arenicola, sp. n. 
10. Clypeus truncatus aut vix emarginatus ; ¢ tegule fere ubique 
grosse et conspicue punctate. 9 imcognita ...... simillimus, sp. Tl. 


Clypeus distincte, sed leviter, emarginatus; tegule minu- 
tissime copiose punctate, punctis grossioribus inter punetula 
Minuta NOMDUNGUAM IMNGETSPETSIS ............... eee cece eee ee ee inl 

11. Abdominis seementum 2 basalinm fasciz evidenter bicolores, 
antice aut aurantiace aut rufescentes, ilies flavescentes 
EEN ] OSVE(CONMNIES Sam anpoaroaes soo scobceasanenondsee ; 12 

Abdominis seementum secundum plerumque nigrum, aut postice 
tantum piceo-marginatum, aut fasciam incompletam habens ; 
primum in aspectu dorsali totum (aut fere totum) flavum, aut 
yoMMOHE CET, IEHOUSL loRKeoMKO MARTIN oO ok apd ghennonnenn cre ron ook 13 

‘12. Femora posteriora ubique aut ex magna parte fulvescentia ; 
Pee facie sua et forma cum finitimis congruens: 


a. Stigma lucide flavescens ...... vce Synchromus, sp. 1. 
b. Stigma obscure flavescens aut aoe venice tte RS 


Femora posteriora nigricantia, apicibus plus minus rufescenti- 
bus; species elongata, angustissima, abdominis segmento 
secundo plus, quam solito, elongato et angusto. 


(Stigma atro-brunneum aut nigrescens.) ........._ leptias, sp. n. 
13. Pronotum ¢ totum flavum aut subaurantiacum ; alarum stigma 
atrum. 


(Abdominis segmentum primum supra aurantiaco-flaypm. 
secundum fascia imperfecta apicali, duabusque maculis 
parvis subbasalibus, vix conspicuis, ornatum; anten- 
narum flagellum nigrum, apice extremo rufescente. 
Picturatio segmenti 2 abdominis an constans ?) ¢. 

tgnotus, Sp. NT. 
Pronotum g et Q haud totum flavum, nonnunquam antice 
flavo-notatum ; alarum stigma lucide flayum. 

(Abdominis segmentum primum supra flavum, secundum 
nonnunquam totum nigrum aut margine apicali piceo 
aut rufescente ; pronotum colore variabilis, supra rufum 
aut nigrum, aut rufo-marginatum, nonnunquam antice 


ornatum maculis duabus distinctis flavis.) ... icamotdes, sp. D. 
14, Tegule ubique copiose, subtilissime punctate ; species major. 
mimus. 


Tegulz conspicue grosse punctate, inter puncta nitidee, pune- 
tulis minutis, vix aut haud diseernendis ..........., imitatoy. 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 579 


1. Paratasror (Paralastoroides) cLorHo Lep. 


Distinct from all other species by the suture of the first 
abdominal segment and by the coloration. I have not seen this 
species, and J do not not know whether Saussure saw more than 
a single example. He says that the suture is ‘ more or less 
distinct.” 


Hab. Australia. 


2. PARALASTOR SAUSSUREI, sp. 0. 


2. Nigra, fronte interantennali rufo-punctata, capitis vertice 
utringque minute flavo-notato; abdominis segmento secundo, 
triangulo elongato nigro mediano excepto, cum sequentibus, ferru- 
gineo, aut plus minus aurantiaco. Clypeus nitidus, haud densim, 
sed plus minus strigose, punctatus, apice distincte, levius 
emarginato. Frons capitis grosse et distincte punctata, linea 
leevi, semicirculari, ocellum anteriorem includente, instructa. 
Capitis vertex et thorax densissime rugoso-punctati, postscutello 
medio elevatulo, sive tuberculato, et, cum propodeo, opaco et 
multo, quam scutellum, subtilius sculpturato. Tegule fortiter 
conspicue punctate. Abdominis segmentum primum, pars 
secundi dimidia basalis, partes frontis capitis orbitales, et basis 
et latera deflexa clypei, albido-tomentosa, partibus abdominis 
ceteris aureo-tomentosis. Al superiores fortiter infuscate, et 
cexruleo-nitentes. Segmentum abdominis 2 ventrale post suleum 
valde fortiter elevatum, elevatione summa prominente. Long. 
a fronte usque ad apicem segmenti 2 abdominis 15 mm. 


Hab. North Queensland (Dodd). 


3. PARALASTOR INFERNALIS Sauss. 


The band of the second abdominal segment varies in colour 
from pale orange-yellow to deeper orange, and is sometimes 
angulately sometimes roundly emarginate. The facial markings 
of the male vary, the clypeus sometimes being wholly yellow, 
sometimes only yellow basally, with intermediate conditions. 
The sinus of the eyes is sometimes yellow, the scape in front and 
a medio-frontal spot probably always so. The pronotum is 
usually spotted with yellow, more rarely black. Three apical 
joints of the antenne small, but distinct. Tegule with 
conspicuous, deep, coarse punctures. 

Hab. Cairns (3 (N. Queensland) and Port Darwin. Twenty-four 
exainples examined. 


4, PARALASTOR RUFIPES, Sp. Nn. 


Agrees generally in form and in sculpture with P. infernalis, 
but is at once distinguished by the red legs and the narrower 
apical band of the second abdominal segment, which is only a 
little dilated at the extreme sides. The postscutellum is without 
the distinct tubercle of infernalis 9, in which species it may be 


580. DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


obscure in the male, but is well developed in the other sex. Size 
of infernalis. 
Hab. North Queensland (Dodd), 1 2. 


5. PARALASTOR FRATERNUS Sauss. 


The male has the clypeus (at least for the most part), the frontal 
spot, and the front of the scape of the antenne orange or 
yellowish orange. The tegule are for the most part very minutely 
punctured and clothed with very short hairs or tomentum. 

Hab. The single male in the Oxford Museum is from New 
South Wales, the female type in the British Museum has no 
special locality assigned to it. 


6. PARALASTOR CONSPICUUS, Sp. N. 


3. Niger; clypeus, macula elongata frontalis huie adjuncta, 
articulus antennarum primus antice, maculeque 2 pronotales 
pallide flava, aut albido-flavescentia. Abdominis segmentum 
secundum fascia lata pallida basali, postice profunde triangulariter 
emarginata, et antice plus minus nigro-emarginata, ornatum, 
Clypeus profundissime emarginatus. Frons capitis ante ocellum 
anteriorem grosse punctata, punctis inter se distinctis. Anguli 
pronotales prominuli. Mesonotum sat grosse et distincte punc- 
tatum, exemplorum recentium dense nigro-tomentosum, pilisque 
erectis breviorilbus subpallidis vestitum. Scutellum tuberculo 
prominente munitum, propodeo antice grosse punctato. Tegule 
dense et minutissime ex parte majore punctate, punctis magnis 
nonnullis presentibus. Abdominis segmentum primum fortiter 
crebre punctatum, punctis sepe sub tomento denso abditis ; 
segmentum 2 ventrale post suleum valde fortiter elevatum, 
elevatione summa prominente; segmentum 7 ventrale_pilis 
erectis minus brevibus vestitum. Antennarum articuli 3 ultimi 
minimi., Al, costali parte excepta, hyaline. Long. 11-12 mm. 

Hab. North Queensland, Cairns district (Dodd). Vive 
examples. 

The sculpture of the tegule, as in fraternus, is quite different 
from that of P. imfernalis and its allies, the coarse punctures 
being altogether confined to their inner half (or almost so), the 
outer part bearing the very fine puncturation. 


7. PARALASTOR DUBIOSUS, sp. n. 


3. Hardly differs from P. conspicua in structure, and is pro- 
bably only a race of that species. The second abdominal segment 
is entirely pale, or has a more or less extensive median longitudinal 
dark marking, The silvery tomentum, that fills the ocular sinus 
and extends down over the deflexed sides of the clypeus, is more 
dense and conspicuous and the sculpture of the latter beneath it is 
somewhat changed in accordance. 

This form varies much in detail of colouring, as shown partly 
in the table of species above. In one example the pronotal spots 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 581 


are extremely small, while in another they form a broad band, 
slightly interrupted in the middle. 

Hab. Queensland, Mackay (Zurner), 5 3; Queensland, from 
E. Saunders’s collection, 2 3. 


8. PARALASTOR COGNATUS Sm. 


This species is entirely distinct from and not closely allied to 
P. fraternus, which it resembles in colour, and of which Smith 
thought it might be the male. Its comparatively slightly 
emarginate, bicarinate clypeus distinguishes it at once. 

Hab. Doro (Wallace); type in the Oxford Museum. 


9. PARALASTOR UNIFASCIATUS Sm. 


Clypeus formed as in P. cognatus; the tegule shining, with 
the minute puncturation not, or barely at all, discernible, whereas 
in cognatus their surface is nearly dull, and there is a copious 
though excessively fine puncturation, 


Hab. Aru (Wallace) ; type in the Oxford Museum. 


10. PARALASTOR CONSPICIENDUS, Sp. n. 


@. Nigra; clypei pars basalis et macula interantennalis, 
nonnunguam sinus ocularis, macula magna utrinque postorbitalis, 
pronoti margo anterior late, fasciaque lata basalis segmenti 
secundi abdominalis, postice emarginata, flava aut albido-flava. 
Clypeus late lunulato-emarginatus, utrinque carina, bene elevata, 
acute munitus. Frons capitis. dense aureo-tomentosa, distincte 
fortiter punctatus, tomento remoto. Anguli pronotales distincti, 
haud prominuli, Mesonotum tomentosum, et pilis erectis sat 
evebre vestitum, postscutello haud evidenter tuberculato. Tegule, 
marginem exteriorem versus, minutissime punctulate, ibique 
haud aliter punctate. Ale, costali parte atro-fusca excepta, fere 
hyaline. Abdominis segmentum 2 ventrale fortissime abrupte 
supra suleum elevatum, elevatione summa antice prominula. 
Long. 12-13 mm. 

Hab. Queensland, Inkerman, near Townsville (Stalker), 1 9 ; 
Townsville, 1 2 (Dodd); Queensland, 1 92, from EH. Saunders. 
All in the British Museum Collection. 


11. PARALASTOR ELEGANS, Sp. n. 

2. Colore et picturatione P. maculiventris Sauss. (Hit. Masar. 
et Suppl. pl. xvi. f. 3). 

This species differs from Saussure’s description of P. maculi- 
ventris only as follows :—The clypeal emargination between 
the teeth is not straight, but slightly rounded; there is only a 
yellow spot on the inner orbits, the head is very densely clothed 
with golden tomentum, not blackish. The fascia of the first 
abdominal segment is incomplete, failing before the lateral 
angles. 


582 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


The clypeus has two very strongly raised longitudinal carine, 
not mentioned by Saussure, but which, as Mr. Meade-W aldo has 
kindly informed me, are present in the type, the face of which is 
asymmetrical or somewhat deformed. In most respects P. elegans 
resembles P. conspiciendus, apart from the quite different colour- 
pattern, but the clypeus is much shorter and the propodeum 
shorter and more rounded, less quadrate. 


Hab. N. Queensland (#7. P. Dodd), 2 2. 


12. PARALASTOR TRICARINULATUS, Sp. 0. 

3. Niger, clypeo, maculaque elongata interantennali, huie 
adjuncta, flavis, macula parva verticis postoculari utrinque 
aurantiaca. Abdominis segmentum primum spatio lunulato 
apicali rufo-decoratum, secundum ferrugineo-rufum, macula 
basali, haud ad medium segmentum extensa, nigra, segmentis 
sequentibus cum tibiis tarsisque aurantiacis aut ferrugineis. 

Clypeus leviter emarginatus, apice lato, anguste _nigro- 
marginato, evidenter, sed parum _ acute, longitudinaliter 
3-carinatus. Frons capitis rugoso-punctata. Pronoti truncatio 
vix marginata. Mesonotum grosse et rugose punctatum. 
Scutellum postice conspicue foveatum. Postscutellum medium. 
subproductum sive subtuberculatum. Abdominis segmentum 
primum transversim subconspicue impressum, puncturatione sua, 
quam mesonotali, minus grossa; segmentum 2 ventrale post 
sulcam abrupte fortiter elevatum, elevatione summa _paullo 
rotundatim prominula, grossim et copiose punctatum ; segmentim 
7 ventrale pilis erectis sat longis conspicue vestitum, medium 
longitudinaliter sulcatum. Ale, costali parte excepta, subhyaline. 

Long. 13-14 mm. 

Hab. Victoria (C. French), 1 3. 


13. PARALASTOR TASMANIENSIS Sauss. 


This species was described by Saussure from a headless male, 
and is said by him to inhabit Tasmania, but I have only seen 
Queensland examples. 

In the male the clypeus, medio-frontal spot, and front of the 
scape of the antenne and the postocular spots of the vertex are 
yellow, the latter sometimes redder or orange. In the female 
the apical portion of the clypeus is black, the rest orange or fer- 
ruginous brown. The scape of the antenne black or largely 
ferruginous or reddish brown in front. The tegule are very 
coarsely punctured, the punctures extending to (or almost to) 
the outer margin. The apical ventral segment of the male is 
wide and widely impressed, and bears only very short hairs, as 
do the preceding segments. 

Hab. Queensland, Brisbane; in Oct., Jan., Dec., and March 
(Hacker). I suspect that the locality (Tasmania) given by Saus- 
sure 1s erroneous. 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 583 


14, PARALASTOR HABILIS, sp. n. 


Abdomen nigrum, segmento secundo pallide flavo, macula, 
magna subtriangulari nigra, ad aut post medium segmentum 
extensa, signato. o clypeus, macula interantennalis, articulus 
antennarum primus antice, macule parve verticis postoculares, 
macule pronotales (nonnunquam fasciam fere integram 
formantes), pallide flava; @ clypeus antice niger, postice 
aurantiacus ; antennarum articulus primus (basi extrema pallida 
excepta) niger. Ale hyaline, costali parte infuscata, plus minus 
flavescente. _Tarsi posteriores, articulo ultimo excepto, nigri 
aut atro-fusci ; tibie aut nigricantes aut rufescentes. 

Clypeus distincte, nee profunde emarginatus; frons grosse 
punctata. Mesonotum, quam densissime, rugoso-punctatum, 
parum dense pilosum; tegulis nigris, grosse usque ad marginem 
exteriorem punctatis ; posteutellum haud aut vix tuberculatum. 
Abdominis segmentum primum pernigrum, dense punctatum, 
inter puncta quasi subtilissime granulatum, secundi pars nigra 
similiter sculpturata, sed remote punctata ; segmentum 2 ventrale 
post suleum fortissime abrupte elevatum, elevatione summa 
prominula; septimum segmentum ¢ ventrale latum, lateque 
impressum, parum conspicue pilosum, pubescentia brevi vestitum. 

Long. 11-13 mm. 


Hab. North Queensland (Dodd); 2 5,1 @. 


15. PARALASTOR SUBHABILIS, Sp. 0. 


Precedenti simillimus, ut apparet, paullo gracilior, alarum parte 
costali magis flavescente, et ibidem venis pallidioribus. Tarsi 
posteriores ubique, aut ex majore parte, pallidi.  Tegule, 
marginem exteriorem versus, pallide. Segmentum tertium 
abdominale plerumque flavo-marginatum, aut plus minusve 
pallidum, rare nigricans, sequentibus segmentis etiam spe 
pallidis. . 

Possibly only a race of the preceding, but superficially quite 
distinct. The pattern of the second abdominal segment is different 
from that of Aabilis, the black median marking narrower and not 
of the same subtriangular form. Unless it has become changed 
post mortem, the ground-colour is also different, the yellow more 
ochreous, or in some examples approaching orange, not pale clear 
yellow or whitish yellow. The colour of the clypeus in the female 
is not constant ; sometimes it is nearly entirely yellow, sometimes 
black on the apical part. 

Hab. Queensland, Mackay, 6 examples (Zurner) ; Queensland, 
1 S$ from EK. Saunders’s collection. 


16. PARALASTOR FLAVICEPS Sauss. 


I have not examined the type of this species, but should the 
tegule have a very coarse puncturation extending to the outer 
margin, then it would be placed in my table next to habilis and 


584 DR. R. CG. L. PERKINS ON THE 


subhabilis, being easily distinguised by its “ téte jaune de soufre ; 
sur le vertex un ovale noir, qui enveloppe les ocelles” (Saussure). 
In any ease this character of coloration will distinguish it from 
any other of the species that have the first abdominal segment 
wholly black. 

Hab. Australia. 


17. PARALASTOR ALBIFRONS Fabr. 


I have not examined the type of this species, but Mr. Meade- 
Waldo has very kindly examined it for me, as to certain 
structural points, from which I infer it should be placed next to 
P. habilis. In fact, I do not feel sure that the latter may not be 
a variety or race of the Fabrician species. 

Hab. Australia (Banks collection). 


18. PARALASTOR APICATUS Sin. 


Tbe type specimen is from Aru, Examples from Papua 
(Odynerus lorentzi Cam.) are at the most slight colour-varieties, 
quite unworthy of a special name. The tegule are punctured on 
their inner portion, smooth and polished outwardly ; the second 
abdominal segment seen in profile rises up strongly above the 
level of the first; ventrally, it rises up strongly, but rather 
obliquely, from the transverse suleus, and the truncation is not at 
all prominent or produced forwards at its highest point. 

Hab. Aru (Wallace), type in the British Museum and 1 ¢ in 


the Oxford Museum. I have seen several examples from New 
Guinea. 


19. PARALASTOR PALLIDUS, Sp. n. 


2. Nigra, clypeo flavo-bimaculato, aut macula curvata basali 
ornato. Frons interantennalis flavo-maculata ; macule pronotales 
flavescentes. Tegule externe flavescentes aut rufo-flave. 
Abdominis segmentum secundum  ochraceo-flavum, macula 
triangulari basali signatum, sequentibus similiter pallide coloratis, 
margine etiam primi postico pallide fasciato, fascia hac media 
emarginata. Femorum apices, tibie, tarsique rufescentia. Ale 
subhyaline, parte costali infuscata. Clypeus nitidus, iregulariter 
punctatus, apice distincte, nec profunde, emarginato, margine 
elevato. Mesonotum densissime punctatum, postscutello inermi. 
Abdominis segmentum primum obscurius punctatum, secundum 
ventrale fortissime post sulcum abrupte elevatum, elevatione 
summa prominente. Tegule ex magna parte dense distinctissime 
et subtilissime punctate. 


Unlike any other species superficially. The second dorsal 
segment is only a little more than ordinarily convex on its basal 
portion. 


Hab. Queensland (E. Saunders’s collection), 1 9 ; Mackay 
(Turner), 1 &. 


> 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 58 


>) | 


20. PARALASTOR INSULARIS Sauss. 


Unlike any other species superficially, the second abdominal 
segment black, with the extreme apex only indistinctly pale. 
Hab. Australia, Swan River; 1 ¢. 


21. PARALASTOR TUBERCULATUS Sauss. (PI. I. fig. 3.) 


A very distinct species, of which I have seen six females, four in 
the British Museum Collection and two in the Oxford Museum. 
This species should be removed from this position and placed 
next to P. odyneroides (no. 67). 

Hab. Tasmania; Adelaide: Victoria (Yrench). In the latter 
locality the abdominal bands are deeper yellow, in one example 
more orange-colourcd. 


22. PARALASTOR EMARGINATUS Sauss. 


Hab. Tasmania, 1 @ in the Oxford Museum; Eaglebawk 
Neck, 5.H. Tasmania, Feb. 12th—March 3rd, 1913,1 9 (Zurner). 


23. PARALASTOR PARCA Sauss. (PI. I. fig. 1.) 


In one or two females the clypeus is quite truncate at the apex, 
and others are intermediate between these and those in which 
it is quite distinctly, though always shallowly, emarginate. 

Hab. Tasmania, Franklin; Mt. Wellington and Eaglehawk 
Neck (Turner); Victoria (French). 


24, PARALASTOR LETUS, sp. n. 


3. Niger, clypeo, antennarum articulo primo antice, macula 
interantennali, duabusque postocularibus, tlavis. Pronotum, 
scutellum et nonnunquam postscutellum, flavo-bimaculata. 
Mesopleura sub tegulis flavo-notata, his ex magna parte rufes- 
centibus, et nonnunquam flavo-notatis, Abdominis segmenta 
2 basalia fascia flava apicali ornata, fascia prima media levius 
emarginata, secunda simplici, haud lata. ‘Tibie tarsique 
rufescentes. Ale distincte infuscate. Clypeus distincte, nec 
profunde, emarginatus, pilis pallidis ubique vestitus. Frons 
capitis dense rugoso-punctata, capite pilis longis vestito. 
Mesonotum dense punctatum, postscutello mermi; propodei 
lateribus rotundatis. Abdominis segmentum primum fortiter 
transversum, parte apicali excepta rugosissime puncturatum ; 
segmentum secundum dorsale basim versus mediocriter convexum, 
pilis erectis longioribus parce vestitum; secundum ventrale 
fortissime et abrupte post suleum elevatum, elevatione summa 
prominente ; segmentum apicale ventrale pilis erectis sat longis 
vestitum, haud distincte depressum. Long. 9-10 mm. 

Hab. Fremantle, Australia (British Museum), 2 ¢. 


25. PARALASTOR FRATER, Sp. n. 


3. Niger, capite thoraceque ut in P. lato, maculatis. 
Abdominis fascia prima et secunda fere wqualiter lati, simplices ; 


586 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


postscutellum nigrum. A P.leto segmento tertio dorsali cum 
sequentibus pilis nullis erectis vestito, segmento 7 ventrali, cum 
preecedentibus, pilis erectis tantum brevissimis vestito, facile 
distinguendus. Tegule minutissime punctate. Abdominis 
segmentum primum latissimum et cum secundo nigerrimum. 


Certainly distinct from the preceding by the differently clothed 
apical male ventral segment—a very important character. In 
both the tegule are for the most part feebly and very minutely 
punctate, the punctures feebly impressed. 

Hab. Albany (Brewer); 1 3 in the Oxford Museum. 


26. PARALASTOR ORDINARIUS, Sp. n. 

9. Nigra, clypeo albido-flavo, macula diseali nigra; macula 
interantennalis, una utrinque postocularis, et due pronotales, 
pallide flave. Tegule nigricantes, in parte exteriore testacesx, 
postice flavo-notatee. Abdominis segmentum primum postice 
albido-flavo-fasciatum, fascia utrinque paullo dilatata ; segmenta 
sequentia simpliciter (nec late) fasciata. Tibi  tarsique 
rufescentes. Clypeus latus, brevior, apice late et levissime 
emarginatus. Frons capitis crebre punctata. Mesonotum dense, 
minus grosse punctatum, postscutello inermi. Propodei latera 
fere equaliter rotundata. Tegule ex parte magna lzevissime, 
polite, impunctate, Abdominis segmentum primum subcrebre 
punctatum, fascia pallida apicali puncta multa ferente. Ab- 
dominis segmentum secundum dorsale basim versus subfortiter 
convexum, ventrale, post suleum, fortiter elevatum, elevatione 
summa haud prominente. Ale subhyaline, parte costali magis 
infuscata, stigmate medio pallescente. Long. 85mm. 

A rather commonplace species, chiefly noticeable as having 
several pale abdominal bands. 

Hab. Victoria, Wimmera (coll. Froggatt), 1 2. 


27. PARALASTOR PUNCTULATUS Sauss. (PI. I. fig. 17.) 

(3 =P. albocinctus Sm.% 2, var. =similis Sauss. 2) 

In this species the apex of the clypeus is not always quite 
truncate, but is sometimes very faintly concave or has the margin 
a little sinuate. The basal abdominal segment is less strongly 
transverse than in many of the allied species. It is certainly 
variable both in small details of colour and structure, and I 
believe that P. albocinctus Sm. is only a male of this species, and 
similis Sauss. a slight variety. Saussure, in his first deseription 
of the latter, says that the second ventral segment of the abdomen 
is “sans tubercule,” and in his supplement he gives the presence 
or absence of a tubercle as the only distinctive character between 
the two forms. As in other species I have found that the trun- 
cation of the segment is sometimes more evidently raised or 
produced in some examples than in others, this minute distinction 
seems hardly sufficient. 

The male of punctulatus is abundantly distinct from any of 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 587 


the similar forms described by Saussure by its 12-jointed (not 
11-jointed) antenne. 

Hab. Tasmania, Mt. Wellington and Eaglehawk Neck, Jan., 
Feb., and March, 1913 (Turner); Hobart; Mt. Kosciusko, 
6000 ft., N.S.W. (Waterhouse). 

28. PARALASTOR OPTABILIS*, sp.n. (PI. I. fig. 12.) 

Picturatio capitis, thoracis et abdominis, cum P. fratris et 
P. leti picturatione congruens. Species robusta, alis infuseatis. 
Clypeus 9 medius niger. Clypeus distincte dentato-emarginatus, 
margine apical inter dentes laterales medio leviter rotundato, sive 
paullo producto, quasi tridentato. Caput cum thorace sat dense 
pilis longis vestitum. Anguli pronotales parum distincti. Meso- 
notum tomentosum, punctis sepe plus minus tomento obscuratis, 
postice haud dense (sc. irregulariter) punctatum, postscutello 
rotundato, imermi. Abdominis segmenta 2 basalia tomento 
nigerrima, puncturatione spe plus minus abdita, sive obscurata ; 
primum fortissime transversum, secundum pilis erectis crebre 
ubique vestitum; fascize abdominales minus late, fere recte. 
Abdominis segmentum 2 ventrale fortiter abrupte post suleum 
elevatum, elevatione summa prominente; segmentum ventrale 
3 apicale, eque ac precedentia, perconspicue et dense pilis 
erectis vestitum. Antenne g 12-articulate. Tibi tarsique 
rufescentes aut testacei, plus minusve (presertim in ¢ ) flavo- 
notati. Femora anteriora et imtermedia ¢ flavo-notata, his 
in © etiam flavo-notatis. Long. 12(¢ )-14(2) mm. 

Hab. North Queensland (Dodd). 


29. PARALASTOR VULPINUS Sauss. 


In its typical form this species is distinct to the naked eye by 
its narrow first abdominal fascia, which, like the second. is pale 
yellow posteriorly and orange- _brown or brown in front, and its 
robust form—the latter ehenacien distinguishing it from other 
species which have similarly bicolorous fasciz. The first abdominal 
band becomes narrower towards the sides. 

Other specimens often show little or no trace of the bicoloration 
of the fascie, which are often orange; the first is then excised 
or emarginate in the middle, so that it is notably widened on 
either side. This form may, with larger and better material, 
prove to be distinct; but I can see no satisfactory structural 
difference. It may be known as P. vulpinus st. excisus, n. 

The well-clothed second dorsal segment of the abdomen, in well- 
preserved examples, is characteristic of both forms. The apical 
ventral segment of the male, if fully exserted, bears at its base a 
remarkable tuft of dense erect hairs, but these may be withdiawn 
beneath the sixth segment. Similar tufts oceur in P. simulator, 
which is evidently allied to vulpinus. The antenne of the male 
are 11]-jointed. 

* This species should be placed next to P. awreocinctus and atripennis, as in the 
table. 

Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. XLI. A] 


588 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


I have seen seven examples of P. vulpinus and ten of the race 
excisus ; most of them are in bad condition. 

Hab. Typical form: Adelaide, 1 2, Oxford Museum, and 
1 2, British Museum; Victoria (French), 1 9 ; Croydon, 1 d 
(Froggatt); the rest without special locality. Race excisus: 
Pt. Stephen, 1 small 2 ; Melbourne (French), 1 2 ; Mittagong, 
N.S.W., 1 2 ; Cumberland, N.S.W. (Zurner), 1 2 ; Woodford, 
GOK 


39, PARALASTOR SIMULATOR, Sp. n. 


Picturatio thoracis et abdominis picturationi P. vulpini fere 
similis; mesopleura seepissime nigra, innotata; scutellum non- 
nunquam bimaculatum; clypeus 9 macula magna curvata 
basali ornatus, aut hac bipartita. Tibiz tarsique ferruginel ; 
tibie posteriores linea albida ornate: ale hyaline costali parte 
sola distincte infuscata. Tegule nitide aut subnitide, flavo- 
marginate, aut albido-marginate, plus minusve_ subtilissime 
punctate. Clypeus leviter aut levissime emarginatus, 9 nitidus, 
parcissime distincte punctatus, inter puncta hee majora sub- 
tilissime distincte punctulatus. Frons capitis dense punctata. 
Angul pronotales distincte prominentes. Caput cum thorace 
puis crebre vestitum. Mesonotum et scutellum crebre, plus 
minus grosse, punctata, scutello inermi. Abdominis segmentum 
primum fortissime transversum; secundum dorsale (precipue 
maris) fortiter supra primum convexim elevatum, ventrale 
fortiter post suleum elevatum, elevatione obtusa, parum pro- 
minente; segmenta sequentia ventralia ¢ brevissime pubescentia. 
Antenne ¢ 11]-articulate, articulis 3 ultimis minutissimis. Long. 
6°5-9'5 mm. 

Hab. Adelaide, 2 ¢ ; Victoria (french), 1 9; 2 g andl 9 
without special locality. 


31. PARALASTOR PUSILLUS Sauss. 


This species is of the same general appearance and structure as 
P. simulator, but should easily be distinguished by the prothoracic 
angles being indistinct or not at all produced and the second 
ventral seginent having the top of the truncation in the middle 
produced into a spiniform tubercle. No mention is made of a 
white or yellow margin to the tegule, nor of the conspicuous 
white or yellow line on the hind tibiz. 

The examples that I have. before me from the British Museum 
and Oxford, named pusillus, are partly P. simulator and partly 
other species. 

Hab. “ Lia Nouvelle-Galles du Sud ” (coll. F. Smith). 


32. PARALASTOR DONATUS, sp. n. 


Colore P. simulatori fere assimilis. Abdomen fasciis duabus 
bicoloratis ornatum, secunda latera versus ampliata. Clypeus 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 589 


$ albido-flavus, 2 niger, macula permagna, curvata, basali, 
aurantiaco-tincta, ornatus. 3 antennarum articuli 2 primi 
antice, maculaque interantennalis albido-flavescentes; 2 arti- 
culus primus antennalis antice aurantiacus, macula inter- 
antennali bicolore. Macule postoculares verticis minute, 
flavescentes. Macule pronotales sat magne, aut bicolores, aut 
rufescentes. Scutellum bimaculatum; mesopleura aut flavo- 
aut aurantiaco-maculata. Propodeum utrinque juxta basim 
suam notatum. ‘Tibiz omnes ¢ cum metatarsis intermediis 
et posterioribus fere tote albide; 2 tibize intermedia et 
posteriores supra longe albescentibus ; femora posteriora utrius- 
que sexus ferruginea; anteriora et intermedia plus minusve 
albido-variegata. Tegule albido-cincte. Clypeus levissime 
emarginatus, ¢ opacus, convexus, dense argenteo-pubescens, 
olsoletim punctatus, inter hec puncta majora densissime et 
subtilissime punctulatus ; 2 pernitidus, distincte sparsim punc- 
tatus, inter hee puncta parcissime, vix evidenter, minutissime 
punctulatus. Frons capitis parum profunde punctata. Anguli 
pronotales fere recti, haud prominentes. Scutellum distincte, 
nec dense, punctatum, postscutello inermi; propodei lateribus 
rotundatis. Abdominis segmentum secundum dorsale haud 
fortiter convexim elevatum, tomentosus, pilis erectis carens; 
ventrale, post sulcum transversum, sat fortiter, suboblique supra 
partem basalem suam elevatum, elevatione summa haud pro- 
minente. Segmentum < ventrale 7 pilis brevissimis erectis 
vestitum. Ale hyaline, costali parte sola infuscata; .tegulis 
glaberrimis, nitidis, ex majore parte impunctatis. Long. 8— 
9 mm. 

Hab. Bacchus (or Bocchus?) Marsh; given to me by my late 
friend, G. W. Kirkaldy. 


33. PARALASTOR DESPECTUS, Sp. n. 


2. Nigra, parte basali clypei macula, antice emarginata, 
aurantiaca ornata. Frons interantennalis aurantiaco-notata. 
Antennarum articulus primus antice flavo-lineatus. Macule 
postorbitales verticis minime, flave. Pronotum rufescens, 
antice utrinque plus minusve flavescens, nigro-marginatum. 
Postscutellum utrinque macula parva aurantiaca aut rufescente 
ornatum. Abdominis segmentum primum, parte nigra declivi 
excepta, fere totum rufescens et postice albido-flavo-marginatum ; 
secundum fascia simili decoratum, antice emarginata, latera 
versus fere ad medium segmentum extensa. Clypeus levissime 
emarginatus, margine apicali elevato, sat dense, grossius punc- 
tatum, et cum oculorum sinu conspicue albo-pubescens. Anguli 
pronotales haud prominentes. Mesonotum cum scutello nitidum, 
illo Gense et grosse punctato, postscutello inermi. Tegule ex 
majore parte glabree, polite, nigra, margine ipso testaceo. Ale 
fere hyalinz, costa magis infuscata. Abdominis segmentum 2 
dorsale ad basim fortiter convexum ; ventrale post sulenm fortiter 

4\* 


590 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


supra partem suam basalem elevatum, elevatione summa hand 
prominente sive tuberculiformi. Tibie ferruginee, intermedize 
et posteriores intra infuscate sive nigricantes, his supra flavo- 
lineatis, tarsis nigricantibus, articulo apicali pallescente. Antenne 
breves et crasse. Long. 8 mm. 


Hab. W. Australia; 1 2 in the British Museum. 


34. PARALASTOR TRICOLOR, sp.n. (PI. I. fig. 5.) 


2 colore P. despecto simillima, sed postscutello haud binotato, 
scutello bimaculato, mesopleuris notatis, abdominis segmento 
secundo minus late fasciate, fascia fere recta. 

3 clypeus flavus aut flavus et aurantiacus, medius fusco- aut 
nigro-maculatus, Antennarum articulus primus rufescens, 
antice flavescens, secundus nonununguam rufescens. Macula 
interantennalis, macule pronotales, scutellares et mesopleurales 
aurantiace, aut plus minus flavescentes aut rufescentes. Tegule 
rufescentes aut flavo-variegate. Abdominis segmentum primun 
supra rufum, antice nigro-emarginatum, postice flavo-mar- 
ginatum. ‘Tibiz tarsique rufescentes. 

' Q ac 6 fere similiter colorata, sed clypeus ex magna parte 
est niger, lateribus flavis aut aurantiacis, tibiis supra sepe longe 
flavescentibus. 

3 clypeus distincte nec profunde emarginatus, parce pune- 
tatus, puncturatione minutissima, inter puncta majora, distincta. 
2 clypeus plerumque levius, quam maris, emarginatus, et 
crebrius, distinctissime punctatus. Mesonotum fortiter denseque 
punctatum, postscutello inermi, propodeo rotundato, distincte 
punctato, angulis pronotalibus parum distinctis. Abdominis 
segmentum secundum dorsale pilis erectis, haud densis (et facile 
detritis), ubique vestitum, basim versus (precipue ¢) sat con- 
vexum. Segmentum 2 ventrale fortissime post suleum trans- 
versum elevatum, elevatione summa prominula, Segmentorum 
sequentium apices sepe aurantiace, aut plus minus pallide. 
Alarum pars costalis distinete infuscata, partibus ceteris leviter 
infuscatis. ¢ antenne 1] articulate ,articulis 3 ultimis minutis, 
? haud plus quam solito insvassate. Long. 8-9 min. 


This species somewhat resembles the preceding P. despectus, 
but is probably not very closely allied, as the female—this being 
the only sex known of the other—has the elypeus much less short 
and much less convex, and the punctures are much less close. 
The second ventral abdominal segment is more strongly raised, 
the top of the truncation in the middle being of more pointed 
form, the second dorsal segment less abruptly and strongly raised 
from the base ete., and the coloration of the insect is brighter. 
It is excessively like P. picteti Sauss. in the other section of the 
genus. The emargination of the clypeus is very shallow in some 
females, rather deeper in others. 

’ erane : 
Hab. Queensland, Cains, 2 9,1 $, July; Kuranda (Dodd), 


1 9; Mackay and Kuranda, several examples (Turner). 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR, 591 


35, PARALASTOR ROSEOTINCTUS, sp. nD. 

@. Nigra; abdominis segmentum primum supra (se. parte 
declivi excepta) fere totum pailide aurantiacum, antice nigro- 
emarginatum ; segmentum secundum fascia lata apicali, lateraliter 
feve ad medium attingente, ornatum. Clypeus maculis duabus 
curvatis magnis lateralibus, nonnunquam ad basim una con- 
junctis, notatus; macula interantennalis magna, postorbitalis 
parva, Antennarum articulus primus antice, aut totus, aut 
basim versus, aurantiacus aut rufescens. Macule pronoti 
magne, ad medium ejus longitudinem attingentes, nonnunquanmr 
una conjuncte (sc. haud interrupte), et fasciam formantes. 
Mesopleura notata ; tegule mesonotum juxta nigricantes. Scu- 
tellum, postseutellum et propodeum aut utrinque notata, aut 
tota nigra. Ale hyaline, parte costali parum late infuscata. 
Tibie tarsique rufescentes. Color picturaticnis est insolitus, 
pallide roseo-tinctus. Clypeus subnitidus, fortiter punctatus, 
puncturatione minutissima interstitiali sat distincta, apice leviter 
emarginato. Frons capitis densissime (nec. profunde) rugose 
punctata. Anguli pronotales distincti, nee acuti. Mesonotum 
sat grosse rugoso-punctatum, tegulis in parte exteriori haud 
evidenter punctulatis, postscutello inermi. Abdominis seg- 
mentum primum haud evidenter transversim impressum, rugoso- 
punctatum ; secundum dorsale fortissime in formam conicam 
elevatum ; ventrale, post suleum suum, distincte (nec fortissime) 
supra partem suam basalem elevatum, elevatione summa late 
rotundata, haudquaquam subacute prominula. Long. 8°5 mm. 


The variation in the colour of the hind parts of the thorax is 
unusual, but I have no doubt the two examples are of the same 
species. The clothing of the thorax is not at all dense, so that 
the sculpture is very easily seen. The very strong and pointed 
elevation of the second dorsal segment of the abdomen is like that 
of P. tuberculatus Sauss. alone of all the species known to me. 

Hab. Australia, Swan River, 1 9 ; W. Australia, 1 2. 


36, PARALASTOR XEROPHILUS, sp. n. 


dé. Niger; clypeus, macula interantennalis, lineaque orbitalis, 
in oculorum sinus extensa, flavescentia, Antennarum articulus 
primus antice aurantiacus, et plus minus flavescens. Macule 
postoculares verticis minores, elongate, aurantiace. Pronotum, 
desuper aspectum, fere totum lete aurantiacum, propodeo 
utrinque macula parva (an semper ?) rufescente ornato, Femora, 
tibie tarsique aurantiaca. Abdominis segmentum primum 
dorsaliter totum aurantiacum, hoe colore in partem declivem 
extenso, basi nigra; segmentum secundum late aurantiaco- 
fasciatum, fascia fere recta, aut tantum antice paullo concavo ; 
Segmenta 2 sequentia aurantiaco-fasciata. Clypeus distincte, 
nee profunde, emarginatus, haud dense, grossius sed leviter, 
punctatus, et inter puncta majora dense minutissime punctulatus, 
argenteo-pubescens. Frons capitis, cum mesonoto et propodeo, 


592 DR. RB. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


quam densissime rugoso-punctata, postscutello inermi. Anguli 
pronotales distincti, truncationis margine distincte elevato. 
Tegule in parte exteriore, qua sunt latissime, impunctate vel 
fere impunctate, puncturatione minuta absenti. Ale sub- 
infuscate, parte costali saturatiore, basim versus flavescente. 
Abdominis seementum primum rugoso-punctatum, medium im- 
pressum ; secundum dorsale basim versus subfortiter convexuin ; 
ventrale, post suleum costatum, fortiter elevatum, elevatione 
summa paullo prominula, ibique grosse rugoso-punctatum ; seg- 
menta apicalia tomentosa, ultimo pilis paucis brevioribus sub- 
erectis vestito, minutissime dense punctulato, haud impresso. 
Long. cirea 11 mm. 


Hab. Central Australia, Hermansburg (17. J. Hillier), 1 ¢o. 


37. PARALASTOR PLACENS, sp. n. 


2. Nigra, clypeo, macula interantennali, et duabus verticis 
postocularibus, pronoto, maculis subtegularibus, duabus magnis 
scutellaribus et propodealibus, duabus postscutellaribus, abdominis 
segmentum primum, triangulo elongato nigro basali, cujus apex 
superficiem superiorem intrat, excepto, margine postico secundi 
sat late, femoribus, tibiis tarsisque aurantiacis aut rufo- 
aurantiacis. Fascia segmenti secundi media antice excisa, seg- 
mentis sequentibus nigris. Tegule ex majore parte aurantiace, 
Ale subhyaline, costali parte infuscata. Clypeus nitidus, sub- 
tiliter perparce punctatus, punctis minutissimis etiam pareis, 
apice distincte, nec profunde, emarginato. Frons capitis grosse 
punctata, punctis sat distinctis. Pronoti truncatio haud mar- 
ginata. Mesonotum dense subrugosim distincte punctatum, 
punctis scutellaribus remotioribus. Postscutellum distincte 
punctatum, inerme. Tegule polite, puncturatione minutissima 
in parte exteriore carentes. Abdominis segmentum primuwn 
subirregulariter punctatum, medium impressum: secundum 
dorsale sat elongatum, lateribus perpaullo rotundatis, fascia 
apicali excepta, tomento nigerrima; ventrale, post sulcum, 
fortissime abrupte elevatum, post elevationem haud grosse 
punctatum. Long. cirea 9 mm. 


Hab. Australia, Swan River, 1 9. 


38. PARALASTOR ERIURGUS Sauss. 


The only examples of this large and robust species that I have 
seen with a definite locality-label are from Queensland. The 
apex of the clypeus is very distinctly margined, at least in 
the female. 

The male has the usual 11-jointed antennee, with the three 
apical joints minute. The third and following ventral segments 
of the abdomen are quite densely hairy, the apical segment 
bearing quite long erect hairs, being finely punctured and without 
an impression. The clypeus is densely pubescent, the larger 
punctures obsolescent, the minute puncturation dense. The 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 593 


tegule in both sexes have a close minute puncturation on their 
outer portion. The amount of black on the clypeus of the female 
varies and probably may be altogether absent, while in some 
the orange colour is reduced to a wide curved or horseshoe- 
shaped mark. ‘The single male has only a small black spot near 
the apex. 

Hab. Queensland, Brisbane (Hacker), 4 92 taken singly in 
JanweetebreMarchy and. April, 9 Hou other 9 and 1 ¢ 
examined. 


39. PARALASTOR ARGENTIFRONS Sunith. 


This species structurally seems to be almost identical with 
P. eriurgus and is perhaps only a southern race of the Queensland 
form, but is very different in superficial appearance. It varies 
greatly in the width of the abdominal fasciz of the first two 
segments. Of the 13 examples before me I do not think that 
there are even two that are alike in the pattern of coloration of 
the second dorsal segment. One example, in which the black 
forms an equilateral basal triangle, bears a MS. label, ‘“ saucius 
Sauss. Type.” The clypeus in the single male bears a black median 
apical spot, in the female it may be all black or marked at the 
base ; it also varies in puncturation, and in some examples is quite 
dull, in others more shining. ‘The pronotal spots may be absent. 
In some examples the upper edge of the truncation of the second 
ventral segment is less pointed in the middle (as in the type) than 
in others, but I have examples taken in company which differ in 
this respect, but not otherwise. The silvery pubescence of the 
sides of the clypeus and adjoining orbits is more distinct and 
conspicuous 1n some than in others. The male characters are as 
in P. eriurgus. 

Hab. Adelaide (my collection), 3 9, 19 & 1 3 (Oxford 
Museum); 8. Australia, 1 @ (Oxford Mus.) and 1 @ (British 
Museum); Victoria (/rench), 4 2; 2 9 without special locality. 


40, PARALASTOR SUBOBSCURUS, Sp. n. 


3. Niger, clypeo flavo, medio nigro-punctato, macula elongata 
interantennali maculaque parva verticis postoculari,  flavis. 
Macule pronotales, mesopleurales, et scutellares aurantiace, 
Tegule aurantiaco-marginate. Abdominis segmenta 2 basalia 
postice rufo-marginata (vix aurantiaca) fasciis fere rectis, minus 
latis. Tibiee tarsique ferruginei aut rufescentes. Ale infuscatee, 
parte costali saturatiore. 

Species villosa, P. eriwrgo et argentifronte angustior. Clypeus 
fortiter emarginatus, nitidus, remote punctatus, minus pubescens. 
Frons rugoso-punctata. Pronoti truncatio haud evidenter mar- 
ginata, angulis tamen lateralibus distinctis. Mesonotum grosse 
punctatum, punctis distinctis, minus confluentibus. Postscutellum 
inerme. Propodeum distincte punctatum, Abdominis segmentum 
primum subequaliter punctatum, pilis longis vestitum ; secundum 


594 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


dorsale pilis brevibus erectis sparsim vestitum, dense nigro- 
tomentosum; ventrale fortissime post: suleum transversum 
elevatum, elevatione summa acutius prominula, puncturatione 
vix grossa aut densa; segmentum ultimum, cum precedentibus, 
pilis sat longis erectis vestitum. ‘Tegule in parte exteriore 
minutissime punctulate, punctis subobsoletis. Long. 9°5 mm. 


Hab, North Queensland (Dodd), 1 3. 


4]. PARALASTOR SIMPLEX, sp. n. 


2. Nigra, macula interantennali, aliisque duabus minutis 
postocularibus aurantiacis. Pronotum et mesopleura maculis 
magnis aurantiacis ornata. Scutellum juxta marginem suuin 
posteriorem et postscutellum fascia interrupta aurantiaca ornata, 
Yeoule pallide; alee subflavo-infuscate. Tibi tarsique ferru- 
ginei, illisaut externe aut subtus nigricantibus, articulis tarsorum 
nonnullis etiam plus minusve infuseatis. Abdominis segmenta 2 
basalia aurantiaco-fasciata, fasciis haud latis, fere zequalibus. 
Clypeus levissime emarginatus, parce subtilins punctatus, inter 
puncta majora parce subtilissime punctulatus, opacus. Pronoti 
truncatio (parte media excepta) fortiter elevato- marginata. 
Mesonotum fortiter densissime punctatum, postscutello inermi. 
Abdominis segmentum primum quam densissine punctatum ; 
secundum dorsale dense nigro-tomentosum, basi haud convexim 
elevata; ventrale, post suleum transversum, fortissime elevatuin, 
elevatione summa conspicue prominente. Tegule opace, punctis 
paucis majoribus exceptis, impunctate. Long. 13 mm. 

This appears to be a very distinct species, but the single 
example is much abraded, and the flavescent appearance of the 
wings may be partially due to age, but on the other hand these 
may be still yellower in fresh examples, as the stigma itself is 
more or less pale in colour. 


Hab. Albany (Brewer), 1 9. 


42. PARALASTOR MIMUS, Sp. n. 


@. Angusta, nigra; macula interantennalis, cum duabus elon- 
gatis postocularibus, pronotum, tegule, scutellum, postscutellum, 
propodeum, macule mesopleurales, abdominis segmentum primum 
(parte decliva majore excepta), femora, tibiz tarsique, nonnunquam 
etiam coxe et trochanteres, rufa aut flavo-rufa. Clypeus aut 
totus niger, aut totus rufescens, aut niger, rufo-tinctus. Ale, 
costali parte excepta, parum infuscate. Clypeus distinete emar- 
ginatus, punctis majoribus et minutissimis commixtis signatus, 
pubescens. Mesonotum postice irregulariter punctatum ; post- 
scutellum inerme. Tegule minutissime punctate, puncta com- 
pliva majora nonnunquam ferentes. Abdominis segmentum 
prmum breviter campanulatum, vix densissime punctatum ; 
secundum ad basim conspicue angustatum, lateribus fere rectis 
aut parum rotundatis, satis foneuu basim versus fortiter con- 
vexum. Segmentum 2 ventrale post sulcum  transversum 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 695 


fortissime elevatum, elevatione summa haudquaquam acute 
prominente, fortiter punctatum. Long. circiter 9 mm. 


Very distinct from any of the preceding species by its colour, 
narrow elongate form, the longer first abdominal segment, lone 
subparallel- -sided second segment, ete. It might almost be placed 
in the other division of the! species here described, and is included 
in the tables of both divisions. 

Hab. Australia, Swan River, 3 2 (two in the Oxford and one 
in the British Museum); 1 @2 in very bad condition is labelled 
‘** New South Wales,” probably in error. 


43. PARALASTOR IMiITATOR, sp.n. (PI. I. fig. 10.) 


2. Preecedenti simillima, sed minor, tegulis grosse punctatis, 
puncturatione minutissima absente, antennis brevibus et crassis 
facile distinguenda. 


Form, colour, and general appearance almost exactly as in 
P. mimus. In the single specimen the clypeus is black on about 
the apical third, its apex is very lightly emarginate. The fourth, 
fifth, and sixth antennal joints are extremely strongly transverse. 
The tegule are very shining, conspicuously, coarsely, and deeply 
punctured, and without the numerous minute punctures that 
form the chief sculpture in P?. mimus. The wings are still clearer, 
with very little infuscation along the costa. ‘The basal abdominal 
segment is rather shorter and the second less abruptly narrowed 
at the base. The second ventral segment 1s considerably less 
strongly raised behind the transverse sulcus. Long. 7°D mm. 

This species is very distinct. 


Hab. Australia, Champion Bay, | @. 


44, PARALASTOR DEBILIS, sp. n. | (CEM, dU, dite, 20.) 


3. Niger, clypeo, antennarum articulo primo antice, maculaque 
postoculari minuta, flavescentibus. Pronoti fascia, utrinque 
dilatata, pars tegularum exterior, note parve scutelli due, fascia 
sat lata postscutellaris, abdominis segmentum primum, parte 
declivi excepta, faseia secundi apicalis, aurantiaca aut aurantiaco- 
rufa. Tibiee ferruginez, tarsis ex majore parte fusco-brunneis. 
Clypeus brevis, sat convexus, apice levissime emarginato, dense 
argenteo-pubescens. Frons capitis pilis crebre vestita. Pronoti 
truncatio fere recta, aut perpaullo concava, distincte elevato- 
marginata. Mesonotum densissime fortiter punctatum, scutello 
similiter punctato, postscutello inermi. Tegule nitide, grosse 
et conspicue punctate. Abdominis segmentum primum, quam 
densissime, grosse punctatum, secundum etiam densissime ubigue 
punctatum, basi fortiter convexim elevata. Segmentum 2 
ventrale post suleum transversum distincte (sed haud fortissime) 
supra partem basalem suam elevatum, elevatione summa haud- 
quaquam acutius producta, post hance late et conspicue im- 
pressum, et crebre punctatum; segmenta apicalia appresse 


596 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


pubescentia, ultimo pilis paucis longiovibus erectis vestito. 
Long. circa 7 mm. 

The pronotal band at its widest hardly reaches the middle of 
the length of the pronotum; the second abdominal segment is 
thinly clothed with more or less erect hairs, its apical fascia 
is not dilated at the sides, and only moderately wide, not 
occupying more than about one-fifth of the segment. 

Hab. West Australia, Swan River, 1869, 1 ¢ (de Boulay), in 
the Oxford Museum. 


45, PARALASTOR EUGONIAS, sp. n. 


3. Niger; clypeus maculaque interantennalis elongata auran- 
tiaco-flavescentes. Pronoti macule due, et tegule ex majore 
parte, rufescentes. Segmentum abdominis primum et secundum 
postice rufo-marginata, fascia prima latera versus angustata, 
secunda utrinque valde dilatata, ibique ante aut ad medium 
segmenti longitudinem extensa, ceteris segmentis (saltem ex 
majore parte) rufis aut aurantiacis. Tibiz tarsique rufescentes. 
Species minor, sed haud gracilis. Clypeus lunulato-emarginatus, 
ex majore parte subdeplanatus, distincte, remote, haud grosse 
punctatus, basi lateribusque suis argenteo-pubescens. Frons 
cum thorace crebre pilosa. Mesonotum dense punctatum, 
scutello inermi. Tegule grosse et conspicue punctate. Ab- 
dominis segmentum secundum dorsale dense, grossius punctatum, 
parte basali fortiter convexa; ventrale, post sulcum, fortiter 
abrupte elevatum, et postice grosse denseque punctatum., Anguli 
posteriores segmenti 2 dorsalis conspicue acute producti. Long. 
circiter 8 mm. 


Hab. Adelaide (A. K. Davis), 1 6. 


46. PARALASTOR MICROGONIAS, sp. n. 


3. Preecedenti simillimus, clypeo breviore et angulis segmenti 2 
dorsalis abdominis posterioribus perpaullo productis distinguendus, 
Long. circiter 7 mm. 

Exactly like the preceding in general appearance, but the 
elypeus is distinctly less produced apically and less flattened, and 
its puncturation rather coarser. The lateral angles of the hind 
margin are only very slightly produced backwards. The wings 
are hardly infuscate, except along the costa, where the infuscation 
is dark and conspicuous. In the preceding species the wings are 
folded and appear dark, but this may be only due to the folding. 
Both species have a small postocular spot on each side of the head, 
which was not mentioned in my description of the preceding, 

In both, the apical antennal joints are excessively minute, 
forming a sort of small tubercle in the concavity of the eighth, and 
it is ditticult to tell whether two or three joints are here present, 
but I have satisfied myself that there are three, so that the 
antenne are normal for the genus, 11-jointed. 


Hab. Adelaide, 1 ¢ (British Museum). 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR, 597 


47, PARALASTOR SANGUINEUS Sauss. 


I examined the type of this species in the British Museum, but 
unfortunately have not been able to make an actual comparison 
between it and the two preceding, one or other of which may be 
only a variety of sanguineus. It has the apex of the clypeus much 
more widely black, in the preceding only the actual margin being 
black. From a rough sketch that I made, it is also, possibly, more 
produced. The red apical band of the second dorsal segment 
of the abdomen is produced further towards the base on each side. 
These colour-characters, however, would of themselves be in- 
sufficient for specific distinction. I did not observe the hind 
angles of the second dorsal segment. 

It certainly appears probable that one or other of these males 
belongs to the female described as vulneratus Sauss.. but the very 
different clypeus forbids us to associate them without further 
evidence. It is usual for the male clypeus to be more deeply 
emarginate than that of the female, whereas in the males and 
females in question, the clypeus of the female is extraordinarily 
deeply emarginate, far more strongly than in the male. Never- 
theless, I suspect that sanguinews Sauss. and vulneratus Sauss. 
are sexes of one species. 


Hab. Australia (British Museum). 


48, PARALASTOR ARGYRIAS, Sp. n. 


3 colore P. sanguineo Sauss., congruens, sed clypeo toto flavo, 
antennarum articulo primo antice flavescente, maculisque pro- 
notalibus magnis, fasciam vix interruptam, utrinque dilatatam, 
formantibus. Ale hyaline, costali parte infuscata. Clypeus fere 
zqualiter conspicue convexus, parum profunde et fere equaliter 
punctatus, puncturatione interstitiali crebra, ubique argenteo- 
pubescens. Oculorum sinus utrinque flavo-notatus. Anguli pro- 
notales parum distincti. Mesonotum dense punctatum, scutello 
inermi, propodeo brevi et rotundato, tegulis grossissime punctatis. 
Abdominis Segmentum primum dense, distincte punctatum, 
lateribus suis, cum lateribus basalis partis secundi, conspicue 
argenteo-tomentosis. Segmentum secundum dorsale latera versus 
copiose, sed haud densissime, punctatum, basali parte fortiter 
supra segmentum primum convexim elevata, fascia apicali utrinque 
fere ad medium segmentum attingente, antice emarginata; seg- 
mentum 2 ventrale, post sulcum transversum, fortiter abrupte 
elevatum, post elevationem summam depressum, puncturatione 
distincta, haud densa; segmentum septimum pubescentia decum- 
bente vestitum, pilis longis erectis carens. Long. circiter 9 mm. 

A very distinct species structurally, but resembling P. ewgonias 
in colour and pattern, except for the yellow front of the scape 
and the much greater development of the pronotal markings. 


Hab. New South Wales, Wagga (Froggatt), 1 3g. 


598 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


A9, PARALASTOR EUCLIDIAS, Sp. n. 

d picturatione fere P. argyriw ornatus, sed fascia segmenti 2 
abdominalis fere ad basim utrinque protracta. Clypeus, anten- 
narum articelus primus antice, macula elongata iterantennalis, 
due postoculares, flavescentia aut flavo-aurantiaca. Macule due 
pronotales aurantiace. Tegule incomplete rufo-marginate. Ab- 
dominis segmentum primum postice late aurantiaco-fasciatum, 
fascia antice emarginata ; fascia secundi fere ad basim segmenti 
utringue producta (sc. segmentum secundum anrantiacum, et 
triangulo magno nigro basali ornatum). ‘Tibize, tarsi apicesque 
femorum aurantiaco-fulvescentes. Segmentum abdominalis ter- 
tium dorsale, cum sequentibus, aurantiacum, segmentis ventralibus 
(que post secundum posita sunt) atris, apicibus pallidioribus. 
Clypeus sat longus, distincte emarginatus, obscure sparsissime 
punctatus, et ubique densissime et minutissime punctulatus, 
ubique argenteo-pubescens. Frons capitis dense, nee profunde 
punctata. Mesonotum crebre punctatum, scutello sat convexo, 
postscutello inermi, tegulis grosse punctatis, propodeo utrinque 
rotundato. Abdominis segmentum primum rugose punctatum ; 
secundum (in aspectu laterali) basim versus fere equaliter 
curvatum, sive convexum, latera versus punctis Inter se ex magna 
parte distinctis, haud ubique rugosim confluentibus. Abdominis 
segmentum 2 ventrale post suleum suum transversum, fortissime 
elevatum, elevatione summa conspicue prominente, post eleva- 
tionem depressum et subfortiter sed vix grosse punctatum ; 
segmentum ultimum latum, brevissime pubescens. Ale, costali 
parte excepta, levissime infuscate. Antenne 11-articulate, 
Long. circiter 10 mm. 

As in many species, there is a silvery pubescence, conspicuous 
in some aspects, along the lower part of the inner orbits and 
filling the sinus of the eyes. 

Hab. Victoria, Gippsland (Froggatt). 


50. PARALASTOR OCCIDENTALIS, sp. n. 


3. Niger, clypeo, macula elongata interantennali, articulo primo 
antennarum antice, duabusque notis postocularibus, aurantiacis. 
Pronotum, angulis deflexis inferioribus exceptis, totum, scutellum 
postscutellumque, macula magna mesopleuralis, coxe (basi ex- 
cepta), femora, tibiz tarsisque, cum lateribus propodei, duabusque 
maculis mesonotalibus triangularibus, rufescentibus, vix auran- 
tiacis. Tegule partibus thoracis ceteris pallidius colorate. 
Abdominis segmentum primum (parte declivi excepta), fasciaque, 
minus lata, apicalis segmenti secundi, rufa. Clypeus sat longus, 
apice distincte, leviter emarginatus, densissime munutissime 
punctulatus, punctis majoribus paucis interspersis, argenteo- 
tomentosus. rons capitis rugose punctata. Pronotum fere 
recte truncatum, truncatione bene elevato-marginata. Pronotum, 
mesonotum et scutellum densissime punctata, scutello haud evi- 
denta armato. Tegule profunde et grosse punctate. Abdominis 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 599 


segmentum primum densissime rugoso-punctatum, secundum 
basim versus haud fortiter convexim elevatum, a latere visum, 
tantum mediocriter convexum. Segmentum 2 ventrale, post- 
suleum, fortissime abrupte elevatum, elevatione summa conspicue 
prominente, sive tuberculata; segmentum ultimum Jatum, sub- 
depressum, brevissime pubescens. Alarum pars costalis usque ad 
stigma pallidum conspicue flavescens, parte cetera plus minusve 
violaceo-nitente. Antenne Il-articulate. Long. 12 mm. 


Hab. Australia, Swan River; 1 ¢ in the British Museum. 


51. PARALASTOR ORIENTALIS, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 21.) 


Niger, clypeo, macula interantennali, duabusque postocularibus, 
antennarum ¢ articulo primo antice, pronoto supra usque ad 
tegulas, scutelli et postscutelli aut fascia completa aut maculis 
duabus, propodeo utrinque, abdominis segmento primo (parte 
declivi except) fere toto, apicali fascia secundi cum sequentibus, 
tibiis tarsisque et sepe parte femorum majori, aurantiacis. 
Clypeus et macula interantennalis sape, quam macule cetere, 
flavescentiores. Ale distincte ubique infuscatee, costali parte 
saturatiore. Clypeus distincte, nec profunde emarginatus, 
fortiter, ¢ multo obscurius, punctatus, puncturatione minutissima 
densa et conspicua. Mesonotum dense rugoso-punctatum, scutello 
inermi, tegulis fortiter punctatis. Abdominis segmentum primum 
distincte punctatum, pilis erectis perparce vestitum : ; segmentum 
secundum tomento pernigrum, pilis erectis carens, fascia apical 
latera versus paullo latiove. Segmentum 2 ventr ale, post sulcum, 
fortissime elevatum, elevatione summa prominula, anterius 
producta, segmento ultimo ¢ subdepressum, pubescens, pilis 
erectis parum vestito. Long. 9-11 mm. 

The orange colour varies in depth, being redder in some and 
yellower in others. Sometimes there are two orange spots on the 
mesonotum in front. There is also variation in the amount of 
puncturation of the tegule. I have seen only six examples, and 
four of these are without special locality. 

Hab. New South Wales, 1 2 (British Museum); 1 2, Queens- 
land, Bundaberg, taken by myself: 2 ¢ 2 2, Oxford Museum, 
and 1 2, British Museum, without special locality. 


52. PARALASTOR LACHESIS Sauss. 


This species has the same coloration as P. orientalis, and may be 
identical with it. Owing to the fact that the sculpture of the 
tegulz is not referred to in Saussure’s description, I cannot place 
it in my tables. The clypeus is said to be “ strongly emarginate,” 
whereas the term is not as a rule used by Saussure for species 
which have the clypeus no more strongly emarginate than 
P. orientalis. 

Hab. Yasmania, according to Saussure, but I have seen no 
Tasmanian species with this style of ccloration, which is so 


600 DR. R. CG. L. PERKINS ON THE 


common on the mainland. Two other species, P. picteti and 
P. tasmaniensis, recorded from Tasmania, are known to me only 
from Queensland, and the possibility of error in Saussure’s 
localities seems to be considerable. 


53. PARALASTOR NAUTARUM Sauss. 


This species, described on a single male, should probably be 
placed near P. orientalis, as I have a note that the tegule are 
very coarsely punctured, the clypeus distinctly, but not deeply, 
emarginate. Superficially at least it is quite distinct from this 
or allied forms, by the first segment of the abdomen being orange 
with a black spot on its declivous basal portion, the second and 
following ones being entirely black. The ventral surface of the 
abdomen has a short dense pubescence. 

Hab, Australia (British Museum), 


54, PARALASTOR SOLITARIUS, sp.n. (PI. I. fig. 6.) 


3g. P. orientali colore et vestitu simillimus, sed minor, orbitis 
interioribus aurantiaco-fasciatis, maculis postocularibus magnis, 
elongatis, ante medium oculorum marginem exteriorem extensis, 
fascia pronotali haud ad tegulas extensa, tegulis ipsis inter puncta 
majora minutissime punctulatis, abdominis segmento 2 ventrali, 
post suleum, multo minus fortiter elevato, elevatione summa haud 
aut vix antice producta, facillime distinguendus. Long. circiter 
7 mm. 


T have seen only one example of this species, which in general 
appearance and sculpture resembles P. orientalis. The orange of 
the basal segment is emarginate with black in the middle in front, 
as in the other, but the second segment is less conspicuously deep 
black, owing to the less dense tomentum, and the puncturation 
therefore appears much more distinct. The tegule bear less 
numerous punctures than is usual in this group. 


Hab. Queensland, Bundaberg, 1 ¢, taken by myself. 


55. PARALASTOR HILARIS, sp. n. (Pl. I. fig. 18.) 


3. Caput flavum, colore flavo postoculari ab colore flavo fron- 
tali separato, vertice nigro, hoc colore late in frontem producto. 
Antennarum articulus primus, cum maxima mandibularum parte, 
flavus. Pronotum, scutellum, postscutellum, propodeum utrin- 
que, mesopleura antice, et tegule, flava, plus minusve hie illic 
aurantiaco-tincta. Coxe, trochanteres, femora, tibie tarsique 
flava, nonnullis in partibus brunnescentia. Abdominis seg- 
mentum primum, parte declivi excepta, flavum, antice nigro- aut 
brunneo-nigro emarginatum; segmentum secundum ad basim 
brunneum, medium nigrum, postice sat late flavo-marginatum, 
segmentis sequentibus plus minusve flavis. Antennarum flagellum 
- subtus plus minusve rufescens. Clypeus sat longus, apice dis- 
tincte emarginato, subeequaliter nec dense punctatus, puncturatione 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 601 


minutissina inter puncta majora densa. Frons capitis cum 
thorace brevissime pilosus. Mesonotum nitidum, densissime, 
‘ortiter punctatum, scutello inermi, tegulis grosse et profunde 
vunctatis. Abdominis segmentum primum latissimum, fortiter 
punctatum, pubescentia minutissima decumbente excepta, fere 
nudum; segmentum secundum fortiter convexim elevatum, pilis 
erectis carens, distincte crebreque punctatum. Segmentum 2 
ventrale post sulcum sat abrupte, sed minus fortiter, supra partem 
suam basalem elevatum, elevatione summa quasi incrassationem 
transversam formante, post hane depressum et subtilius nec dense 
punctatum ; segmentum ultimum pilis erectis evidenter vestitum, 
leviter convexum, et subtiliter, nec dense, punctatum. Ale fere 
hyaline, costali parte conspicue infuseata. Long. circiter 7 mm. 
Hab. Northern Australia, Port Darwin; North Queensland ? 
(Dodd). , 


56. PARALASTOR MACULIVENTRIS Sauss. 


I think it probable that this species may be identical with my 
P. elegans, described above. Saussure says nothing of the strongly 
raised elongate clypeal carine, which Mr. Meade- Waldo informs 
me occur in Saussure’s ty pe, as in P. elegans. He also informs 
me that the type specimen is deformed, the sides of the face being 
asymmetrical. The only difference, so far as I can judge, between 
the two forms is that in P. maculiventris the apical band of the 
first abdominal segment is entire, not disappearing before it 
attains the lateral angles, that the head is said to be covered with 
a blackish tomentum (pale in P. elegans, and conspicuously golden 
in front), the ‘inner borders of the eyes are yellow” (only a 
yellow spot in the sinus in P. elegans), while the latter has the 
postscutellum hardly perceptibly tuberculate. 
Hab. Australia. Type in the British Museum. 


57. PARALASTOR BICARINATUS, Sp. N. 


Niger, macula interantennali, duabus postocularibus, duabus 
pronotalibus, maculis duabus, aut una magna, scutellaribus, 
duabus propodealibus, tegulis, segmentum primum abdominis 
(parte declivi excepta) ex majore parte, secundique fascia apical, 
plus minusve antice utrinque producta, cum parte apicali seg- 
mentorum sequentium, flavis. ¢ clypeus totus, antennarumque 
articulus primus antice, flavi; 2 clypeus medius, cum lateribus 
extra carinas niger. Al fere hyaline, costali parte infuscata, 
stigmate atro-fusco. Tibi tarsique apicesque femorum flaves- 
centes. Color flavus plus minus aurantiaco-tinctus. Clypeus 
fortiter emarginatus et acute dentatus, parce punctatus, inter 
puncta majora minutissime punctulatus, fortiter productus, et 
duabus carinis elongatis, acute elevatis, munitus. Frons capitis 
grosse et distincte punctata, interstitiis inter puncta minute 
punctulatis. Mesonotum grosse punctatum, pilis erectis longi- 
oribus vestitum, pronoto antice parum distincte marginato, 


602 ‘DR. R, C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


sentello inermi. Tegule parum nitide, minutissime obsoletim 
punctulate, punctis nonnunquam tribus aut duobus majoribus 
notandis. Abdominis segmentum primum minus for titer punc- 
tatum ; secundum ad basin subfortiter convexum. Segmentum 
2 ventrale post sulecum fortissime elevatum, elevatione summa sat 
fortiter prominente; segmentum ultimum subconvexum, haud- 
quaquam depressum, breviter pilosum. Long. 9-11 mm. 


In the male the yellow of the first segment is nearly straight in 
front, in the female it is emarginate in the middle. The ‘apical 
band ah the second segment in the male does not reach the middle 
of the segment, in the female it extends far beyond the middle 
basally. “T think this is mere individual variation and probably 
not a constant sexual difference. 


Hab. Queensland, Mackay (Z'urner); 1 g and 1 Q. 


58. PARALASTOR ATRIPENNIS, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 13.) 


2 color colori varietatum P. argentifrontis nounullarum per- 
fecte similis, sed alis atris ubique violaceo-nitentibus primo 
aspectu distinguenda. Macule parve interantennales cum 
duabus postocularibus aurantiace. Segmentum primum ab- 
dominis fascia apicali fere recta, haud dimidiam partem suam in 
aspectu dorsali occupante, seeds fascia lata rufescente, antice 
emarginata, latera versus ante medium segmentum protracta, 
ornatum, exteris segmentis his fasciis colore fere similibus, 
Tibie tarsique r -sufescentes. Tegulee obscurius rufescentes. Clypeus 
fortiter emarginatus, dentibus lateralibus obtusis, inter hos 
margine nonnullis in aspectibus perpaullo prominente, ut quasi 
obscure tridentatus appareat, nitidus, antice fortius, postice 
subtilius punctatus, et inter puncta majora minutissime punctu- 
latus. Frons eapitis rugosa, punctis obscurissimis. Mesonotum 
subopacum, puncturatione inwquali, punctis nonnullis grossioribus, 
nonnullis minus grossis commixtis. Postseutellum medium paula 
productum, sive ance ure tuberculatum.  Tegule dense minutis- 
sime punctate, punctis perpaucis majoribus presentibus. Ab- 
dominis segmentum secundum ventrale post suleum transversum 
fortissime abrupte elevatum, elevatione summa prominula, Long. 
circa 14 mm. 


IT have seen only one old example in dirty condition. It is 
very distinct from any other that has similar coloration and 
markings. The clypeus is more or less flat over most of its 
surface, excepting the base and the decurved sides. 


Hab. Adelaide (Wilson); 1 2 in the Oxford Museum. 


59. PARALASTOR AUREOCINCTUS Guer. 


There is a single female of this species in the British Museum, 
bearing a label ce Alastor eriurgus, var.” Practically it resembles 
eriurgus in colour, but in structure it is extremely close to the 
preceding, to which it has no superficial hkeness. The tegule 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 603 


have the same dense, distinct, minute puncturation and the clypeus 
is nearly of the same form, as also is the general sculpture. The 
postscutellum has even less evidence of a tubercle than that of the 
preceding species. Length about 15 mm. 

Hab. Australia, without definite locality; 1 2 in the British 
Museum. Judging from the coloration, one would expect to find 
this species in Queensland. 


60. PARALASTOR DENTIGER, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 11.) 


3 colore et picturatione fere P. mimi (q.v.) ornatus. Notex 
postoculares minores, clypeo aurantiaco, margine apicali et non- 
nunquam linea mediana nigris. Alee ubique infuscate. Clypeus 
fortiter emarginatus, nitidus, parte media nitida, glabra, de- 
planata, basi lateribusque decurvatis et dense argenteo-pubescenti- 
bus. Frons dense et rugose punctata. Mesonotum densissime 
punctatum, postscutello tuberculo spinoso conspicue armato, 
tegulis puncturatione densissima et minutissima carentibus, sed 
punctis nonnullis majoribus plerumque distinctis. Abdominis 
segmentum primum transversim subdepressum, plus minusve 
rugoso-punctatum, colore rufo antice profunde, sed anguste, nigro- 
emarginato; segmentum secundum dorsale basim versus leviter 
convexum ; ventrale, post sulcum suum transversum, fortissime 
elevatum, elevatione summa prominente; segmentum ultimum 
cum precedentibus pilis erectis evidenter vestitum. Antennz 
1l-articulate, tribus apicalibus articulis minutis. Long. 11-5 mm. 


This is a more robust species than P. mimus and imitator, which 
it so much resembles superficially. The posterior face of the 
propodeum is more extensively black than in the former. Struc- 
turally it is entirely distinct from both. 

Hab. Champion Bay and Swan River; 2 ¢ in the British 
Museum. 


61. PARALASTOR INFIMUS, Sp. n. 


3 picturatione, forma, et colore P. eriurgo simillimus, sed apice 
clypei haud distinctissime elevato-marginato, et scutello sat 
conspicue tuberculato bene distinguendus. Clypeus leviter 
emarginatus, grosse punctatus, nitidus, basi lateribusque dense 
argenteo-pubescentibus. Frons dense rugoso-punctata. Tegulee 
densissime et minutissime punctulate. Thorax sat grosse punc- 
tatus, pilis erectis ubique conspicue vestitus. Abdominis seg- 
mentum primum medium impressum, margine apicali excepto, 
crebre punctatum. Abdominis segmentum 2 ventrale, post 
suleum fortissime elevatum, subopacum, crebre punctatum, 
elevatione summa prominula, hoe segmento cum sequentibus 
pilis erectis fere xquilongis vestito, segmento ultimo spatium 
medianum nitidius, lineis elevatulis definitum, prabente. Long. 
12°5 mm. 


Hab. Queensland, Brisbane (Hacker), 1 3d in December. 
Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. XLII. 42 


604 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


62. PARALASTOR SUMMUS, Sp. N. 


@.. Nigra, clypei lateribus deflexis (parte apicali excepta), macula 
interantennali, duabus postocularibus, pronotalibus, mesopleura- 
libus et scutellaribus cum parte tegularum, flavescentibus, aut 
plus minus aurantiaco-flavis. Abdominis segmentum primum et 
secundum late aurantiaco-marginata, fascia secunda utrinque 
ante medium segmentum protracta, segmentis sequentibus, plus 
minusve aurantiacis.  Tibie tarsique rufescentes. Clypeus 
(lateribus deflexis exceptis) deplanatus, nitidus, fortiter in parte 
apicali punctatus, apice subfortiter emarginato et producto. 
Frons cum thorace fusco-pilosa. Mesonotum grosse punctatum, 
inter puncta minutissime punctulatum, sive quasi granulatum, 
postscutello tuberculato, tegulis densissime punctulatis, opacis. 
Ale subhyaline, parte costali infuscata. Abdominis segmentum 
primum ex majore parte subtilius nec dense punctatum, secundum 
basim versus minus fortiter convexum, tomento pernigro vestitum, 
pilis erectis parcissimis. Segmentum 2 ventrale post suleum 
suum fortissime elevatum, elevatione summa, desuper visa, sub- 
angulata. Long. cireiter 12 mm. 


This is a less robust species than the preceding, and the thorax 
is notably longer. The flat portion of the clypeus becomes very 
narrow posteriorly, being closely adapted to, and continuing the 
plane of, the interantennal plate, when viewed from the side. 


5 {oapn] 
Hab. Queensland, Cairns, 1 °. 


63. PARALASTOR MEDIUS, Sp. n. 


2 precedenti cognatissima, clypeo breviore, hasim versus fortiter 
sed sparsim punctato, propodeo utrinque maculato, distinguenda. 


Very similar to the preceding, but the coloration is still 
yellower (less orange), the clypeus is reddish apically and the 
yellow colour of the sides extends to the apical teeth. The 
yellow pronotal markings nearly reach the tegule, instead of 
being confined to the front half; the band of the basal abdominal 
segment is different in form, being emarginate in the middle of its 
front margin, and the second is only a little widened at the sides ; 
the legs are much more pale in colour. Strueturally, the clypeus 
easily separates the two forms. 


Hab. Queensland, Mackay, 1 2 (Zurner). 


64. PARALASTOR EUSTOMUS, Sp. Nn. 


QO. Nigra, clypeo utrinque late, macula elongata interantennali, 
parte articuli primi antennalis antica, notis postorbitalibus duabus, 
pronoto fere toto, tegulis, fascia scutellari et postscutellari, pro- 
podeo utringue, femoribus, tibus tarsisque, segmento (parte 
magna basali declivi excepta) primo, fasciaque apicali, vix dilatata, 
secundi, cum segmentis sequentibus, aurantiaco-rufis. Clypeus 
profundissime emarginatus, emarginatione, quam semicireulus, 
profundiore, post hane depressus, nitidus, punctatus, lateribus 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 605 


deflexis opacis et pubescentibus. Frons capitis et thorax densius 
pilosi, pilis minus longis. Pronotum antice fere recte truncatum, 
parum distincte marginatum. Tegule dense minutissime punc- 
tulate, fere opace. Postscutellum medium tuberculo spiniformi 
armatum. Abdominis segmentum primum transversim subde- 
pressum, haud grosse punctatum ; secundum dorsale, basim versus, 
haud convexim elevatum ; ventrale, post sulcum transversum, 
fortissime elevatum, fortiter nec dense punctatum. Ale in- 
fuscatee. Long. circiter 12 mm. 


Owing to the depression of the clypeus anteriorly, behind the 
emar zination, two blunt or rounded carine are formed where the 
sides are deflexed. 

Hab. Australia, no special locality. Two old and dirty examples 
in the British Museum. 


65. PARALASTOR PSEUDOCHROMUS, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 14.) 


2 colore et picturatione P. argentifrontis Sm. ornata, et ut 
probabile, eodem modo variabilis; structura a P. ewstomo vix 
distinguenda. Long. 10°3-12 mm. 

Two long curved spots on the sides of the clypeus and the 
medio-frontal and postocular spots orange, those on the clypeus 
reduced in size and redder in one example. Pronotal spots, which 
are small, and the pale part of the tegule orange or red. Both 
the first and second fascize of the abdomen are broad and laterally 
dilated, the second at its middle reaching about to the middle of 
the segment, and towards the sides considerably nearer still to 
the base. The coloration is not the same as that of P. eustomes, 
but is rather that described by Saussure as “ sanguineus.” Ex- 
cepting that it appears to be of rather more slender and elongate 
form, the species in structure is much like P. eustomus. Since 
the two exawples, that I have seen, exhibit some variation, further 
material is necessary to decide whether the present species and 
P. eustomus are more than local colour-forms of one species. 

Hab. Victoria (French); two examples. 


66. PARALASTOR VULNERATUS Sauss. 


This small but robust species appears to vary in the pattern of 
the second abdominal segment, like P. argentifrons Sm., or rather, 
I should say, like the examples I refer to that species. The 
clypeus may be all black, or may have small or large, orange or 
red, basal markings. 

The extraordinary prolongation and flattening of the clypeus, 
with its very deep emargination, and the flattening of the plate 
between the antenne to adapt it to the base of the clypeus, sepa- 
rate it from any other, except the following. The extremely deep 
and coarse puncturation of the tegule, the form of the insect and 
its sculpture, and the condition of the hind angles of the second 


abdominal segment, are altogether like P. sanguineus Sauss., 
42% 


606 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


of which I suspect it may be the female. No two of the three 
females are alike in detail, but the material is quite insufficient 
for a proper understanding of the species. The clypeus is 
normally extraordinarily dull, and I suspect this is due to some 
special excretion, as a specimen I possess shows some more shining 
spaces and some dull raised lumps, as if the excretion had not 
been distributed in the usual even manner. ‘The scutellum is 
unarmed, and the second ventral segment is very strongly and 
abruptly raised behind the transverse suleature. 

Hab. Victoria, 1 Q (French); 1 2, without special locality, in 
the Oxford Museum; 1 9, Adelaide, in my collection. 


67. PARALASTOR FALLAX, sp. 0. 


2 picturatione et colore P. mimi (q.v.) et dentigert ornata. 
Clypei pars deplanata antice nigra, postice rufa. Ale fere 
hyaline, parte costali perconspicue infuscata. P. vulnerato 
structura evidenter cognatissima, sed: major, clypeo nitidissimo, 
mesonoto magis nitido, abdominis segmento 2 dorsali, basim 
versus, leviter convexo, facile distinguenda. Long. 10 mm. 


The markings are red, as in various other species from Western 
Australia, which it entirely resembles superficially. I cannot be 
certain whether the clypeus is always highly polished, as in the 
single example described, or whether it may not be sometimes 
dull, as in vulneratus, but in any case the species is easily 
distinguished structurally by the small convexity of the second 
abdominal segment, which in vulneratus, viewed laterally, rises 
convexly above the first to a distinctly more conspicuous degree. 

Hab. W. Australia, 1 2 (British Museum). 


68. PARALASTOR BRISBANENSIS, Sp. N. 


@. Nigra, clypeo utrinque, macula parva interantennali dua- 
busque postocularibus, pronoto (desuper aspecto) ex majore parte, 
tegulis, fascia lata scutellari, fascia postscutellari, macula utrinque 
mesopleurali, abdominis segmento primo (parte declivi excepta) 
ex majore parte, fascia secundi segmenti minus lata, fere recta, 
cum marginibus posterioribus segmentorum sequentium, auran- 
tiacis. Al infuscate, parte costali saturatiore. Clypeus leviter 
late emarginatus, opacus, equaliter, subtiliter punctatus, et 
lateribus deflexis argenteo-pubescentibus exceptis, ubique de- 
planatus. Frons inter antennas deplanata, clypeo quam _perfec- 
tissime adaptata, spatio depresso, ocellum anteriorem includente, 
lineis curvatis levibus et elevatis late marginato. Mesonotum 
grosse punctatum, postice tri-sulcatum, sulcis lateralibus ad 
pronoti marginem interlorem extensis, postscutello inermi, 
tegulis nitidis, sat conspicue grosse punctatis. Abdominis seg- 
mentum primum profunde, sed minus grosse, punctatum, inter 
puncta quam densissime punctulatum, sive granulatum. Seg- 
mentum 2 dorsale pernigrum, densissime inter puncta minutissime 
sculpturatum, basim versus fortiter convexum ; segmentum 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 607 


2 ventrale, post sulcum, fortissime elevatum, elevatione summa 
prominente. Long. 11-5 mm. 

The clypeus is wide and much less produced than in P. vul- 
neratus, and is only feebly emarginate, but it is flattened in the 
same perfect manner, and the “front, between the antenne, is. 
similarly flattened. The raised smooth lines of the front of the 
head are found only in this and the following allied form. The 
femora all have a conspicuous yellow apical spot outwardly, which 
contrasts strongly with the ferruginous tibiz and tarsi. 

Hab. Queensland, Brisbane. I captured 1 @ on Christmas 
Day, 1904. 


69. PARALASTOR MACKAYENSIS, sp. n. 


2 structura preecedenti fere similis, sed abdomine flavo-ornato, 
pedibus pallidioribus, fascia prima abdominali antice sat profunde 
nigro-emarginata, pronoti maculis multo minoribus, scutello post- 
scutelloque binotatis, haud fasciatis, distinguenda. 


In the very poor material at my disposal I see no structural 
character that could be relied on, as constant, to separate this 
form from the preceding, of which it is probably a more northern 
race. In markings and in colour of the markings the two are 
very distinct, the deep orange colour of brisbanensis being 
replaced by a more ochreous or pale orange in mackayensis. 

Hab. Queensland, Mackay, 2 2 (Turner); 1 2 from the same 
locality from E. Saunders. 


70. PARALASTOR PRINCEPS, Sp. n. 


Niger, valde longipilosus, macula parva interantennali, dua- 
busque minutis postocularibus, ornatus. Macule due ee 
pronotales, fascizeque due abdominales, minus late, aurantiac 
d clypeus cum parte articul antennarum primi antica Cee ne 
Species grandis, pilis longis ubique conspicue vestita, capite 
quadrato -incrassato, clypeo (precipue ¢) brevi, lato, apice 
truncato, pilis longis erectis conspicue vestito; clypei 2 punctis 
majoribus alisque minutis sat densis. Frons media dense 
rugosim sculpturata, antennas versus et in sinu oculari utroque 
pilis longis nigricantibus conspicue vestita. Mesonotum et 
seutellum quam densissime sculpturata, postscutello inermi. 
Abdominis segmentum primum pilis longis griseis, secundo 
etiam et sequentibus pilis erectis longis et conspicuis vestitis. 
Ale (costali parte excepta) exemplorum recentium parum 
infuseate. Tegule subtiliter punctate, minutissime etiam 
punctulate. Abdominis segmentum 2 ventrale post suleum 
suum transversum fortissime elevatum, elevatione summa 
prominente, pilis longissimis vestitum, segmento d ultimo 
minutissime punctato, punctis paucis majoribus intermixtis, 
pubescente, et pilis erectis sparsim vestito. Femora, tibie 
tarsique nigra, aut nigricantia, tibiis posterioribus basin versus 


608 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


maculatis, pilis longis tenuibus sparsim vestitis. Long. 14- 
15 mm. 

This large hairy species with truncate clypeus cannot be 
confused with any other. There is a good female in the British 
Museum bearing a MS. label, ‘ Alastor australis,’ which is a 
‘smaller species with ferruginous tibie and tarsi, and otherwise 
different. There is a single male, deprived of the greater part 
of its antenne, and a very old abraded female in the Oxford 
Museum, which have the wings more infuscate or discoloured 
by age. 

Hab. W. Australia, 1 3, 2 2, as referred to above. 


71. PARALASTOR SUBOLORIS, Sp. n. 


Mas mari precedentis colore, vestitu et sculptura similis, sed 
statura multo minore, thorace toto nigro, abdominis fascia prima 
latissima, partem majorem segmenti, desuper aspecti, oecupante ; 
tarsis omnibus tibiarumque apicibus testaceis, facillime distin- 
guendus. ong. 10 mm. 

Apart from the above characters, the apical ventral segment is 
still broader, its minute puncturation is less dense, and the few 
slightly larger punctures are hardly noticeable, while the second 
ventral segment is much more finely punctured. A single 
female in the British Museum may belong to this species. It 
lacks the minute imterantennal spot of the male, but has two 
small prothoracic ones. Its second dorsal segment is very long 
and parallel-sided. It is in a dirty condition. 

Hab. W. Australia, 1 ¢ in the Oxford Museum. 


72. PARALASTOR OLORIS, sp. n. (PI. I. figs. 4 & 16.) 

Mas mari P. suboloris forma, sculptura, vestitu et colore 
simillimus, sed minor, antennarum articulo primo nigro, tibiis 
tarsisque ferrugineis facile distinguendus. 

A small narrow species, with the basal orange fascia deeply 
emarginate in front, the 2nd ventral segment with large sparse 
punctures, and the top of the truncation in the middle still more 
strongly raised and prominent than in the preceding species. 
The apical ventral segment is less wide, very dull from the 
extreme density of the sculpture, which is hardly to be distin- 
guished as puncturation, between the fine and sparse feeble 
punctures, that can be distinguished as such. The clothing of 
this segment consists of excessively short pubescence or tomentum, 
long, erect hairs being absent. ‘he second ventral segment is 
almost bare except just behind the tubercle, and the following 
ones are merely tomentose. Antenne 1] -jointed, with the three 
apical ones minute, as in P. suboloris. 

Hab. Australia, Swan River; 1 ¢ in the British Museum. 


73. PARALASTOR COMMUTATUS, sp. n. 


ae ¢ : 
©. Nigra, angustula, clypei macula basali magna, curvata, 
macula interantennali, duabus postocularibus minutis, pronote 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 609 


ex parte maxima, maculis 2 rotundatis scutellaribus, duabus 
minutis mesopleuralibus, fascia latissima segmenti 1 abdominalis, 
faseia secundi fere recta et, quam fascia prima, multo minus lata, 
tibiis tarsisque omnibus, rufescentibus. Clypeus truncatus, ex 
majore parte dense, subtiliter ruguloso-punctatus. Mesonotum 
posterius irregulariter aut vix dense punctatum, postscutello 
inermi. Tegule vix nitide, ex majore parte subtilissime, vix 
evidenter sculpturate, puncturatione minutissima distincta 
carentes. Abdominis segmentum primum haud  fortissime 
transversum, parte declivi excepta fere totum rufum; secundum 
elongatum, lateribus fere parallelis, basi haudquaquam convexim 
elevata. Segmentum 2 ventrale post sulcum fortissime elevatum, 
elevatione summa fortissime prominente, tuberculum fortem 
formante. Long. 9 mm. 

I have seen only a single female of this distinct species and 
it is in dirty condition. The wings appear to be infuscate, but 
this may be partly due to this condition. In any case the costal 
portion is much darker than the rest. 

Hab. Australia, Champion Bay; 1 9 in the British Museum. 


74, PARALASTOR CARINATUS Sm. (? LATERITIUS Sauss., var.). 


I have before me a single female from the Oxford Museum, 
which I refer, as a slight variety, to this species. It has a pair of 
small orange basal spots on the clypeus, and the black colour of the 
second abdominal segment is more extensive, forming a basal 
band, angulated in the middle and with irregular sinuations on 
each side of this. The clypeus is truncate, punctate, and more or 
less strigose, turned upwards on its apical portion, and with a 
fovea in the middle adjoining the apical margin. There is in 
some aspects a faint trace of tuberculation in the middle line of 
the postscutellum. The second ventral segment is very strongly 
raised behind the transverse sulcature, and somewhat pointedly 
produced in the middle at the top of the truncation ; it is rather 
finely and not very unevenly punctured, with very distinct 
interstitial minute puncturation. 

Hab, Adelaide, 1 9, Oxford Museum. The type is in the 
British Museum and must nearly, if not altogether, agree with 
the Oxford specimen, except in slight points of colour, which vary 
shnilarly in other species. 


7). PARALASTOR VIDUUS, Sp. n. 


3. Niger, clypeo, articulo antennarum primo antice, maculis- 
que 2 postocularibus, flavis. Pronotum colore aurantiaco-flavo 
bimaculatum, scutello minute binotato. Abdominis segmenta 
2 basalia sat late aurantiaco-fasciata, segmentis nonnullis sequen- 
tibus etiam fasciatis. Clypeus nitidus, late truncatus, minus 
inequaliter punctatus, pilis erectis, aut suberectis, pallidis 
vestitus. Frons cum thorace pilis longis subfuscis conspicue 
vestita. Pronoti truncatio evidenter marginata. ‘Tegulie nitidi, 


610 DR. R. GC. L. PERKINS ON THE 


ex maxima parte vix punctate. Postscutellum inerme. Abdominis 
segmentum primum transversim depressum, margine posteriore 
elevatulo, medium subfoveatum, puncturatione confusa ; secundum 
dorsale pilis parcis longis erecte vestitum, fortissime convexim 
elevatum ; ventrale, post suleum suum, fortiter elevatum, eleva- 
tione summa haud prominente, cum sequentibus hirsutissimum, 
segmento ultimo pilis erectis brevioribus sat dense vestito. 
Antenne fortiter clavate, 12-articulate, articulis 4 ultimis parvis. 
Long. circiter 11 mm. 


Hab. Victoria, 1 $ (French). The specimen bears several 
labels: “C.F. 8.00”; “Macedon 1.3.93”; ‘‘ Melbourne, Vic- 
toria.” 


76. PARALASTOR ODYNERIPENNIS, Sp. Nn. 


2 colore fere precedentis, sed clypeo nigro, ad basim flavo- 
aurantiaco-maculato, scutello et antennis nigris, tibiis nigri- 
cantibus, tarsis ex majore parte atro-brunneis. 

Structurally this appears to me to be almost identical with 
P. carinatus, but the dark legs (the hind tibize inwardly at the 
base being rufescent) easily distinguish it. The second cubital 
cell is triangular and not at all petiolate. The second abdominal 
fascia does not occupy half the length of the segment. 


Hab. Victoria (French). 


77. PARALASTOR ODYNEROIDES, sp. Nn. 


3g colore P. vidui, sed macula interantennali elongata flava, 
scutello nigro, maculis pronotalibus minutioribus aurantiacis, 
distinguendus. Structura valde distinctus. Clypeus fere recte 
truncatus, medius depressus, utrinque quasi rotundatim cari- 
natus, obscure punctatus. Mesonotum grosse punctatum, post- 
scutello inermi, tegulis nitentibus, ex majore parte obsoletissime 
minutissime punctulatis. Abdominis segmentum primum fortiter 
transversum, rugosissime grosse punctatum, parte declivi media 
longitudinaliter carinata. Segmentum 2 dorsale fortiter basim 
versus convexim elevatum, fascia utrinque ante medium seg- 
mentum extensa, profunde rotundatim antice emarginata, seg- 
mentis ceteris aurantiacis. Segmentum 2 ventrale post suleum 
fortiter abrupte elevatum, elevatione summa subangulatim 
producta; segmentum ultimum fortiter convexum, pilis erectis 
vestitum. Antenne 11-articulate, articulis 3 ultimis minimis. 
Cellula 2 cubitalis haud petiolata. Long, circiter 11 mm. 


Hab. Australia; 1 ¢ in the Oxford Museum. 


78. PARALASTOR MUTABILIS, sp.n. (PI. I. fig. 8.) 

Q. Nigra, clypei macula basali transversa, antice emarginata, 
duabus minutis postocularibus, duabus pronotalibus, tegularum 
parte exteriori, fascia lata abdominalis segmenti primi, antice 
emarginata, fascia secundi, aut fere simplici, aut ytrinque valde 


WASP GENU PARALASTOR. 6i1 


dilatata, et fere ad basum segmenti extensa, rufis aut rufescen- 
tibus. Clypeus latus, truncatus, subeequaliter punctatus, et 
minutissime punctulatus. Mesonotum crebre fortiter punc- 
tatum, scutello inermi, tegulis nitidis, punctis majoribus non- 
nullis, param fortiter impressis, presentibus. Ale infuscate, 
parte costali saturatiore. Abdominis segmentum secundum 
dorsale ad basim subfortiter convexum; ventrale, post suleum, 
sat abrupte elevatum, parte antesulcali parti postsulcali alti- 
tudine subquali, elevatione summa haudquaquam prominente. 
Long. 9-10 mm. 


With this species begins a series of forms with the hind part 
of the second ventral segment raised only to about the height of 
the basal portion, and with the clypeus always truncate apically. 

Hab. Victoria (French); 2 2, Sept. 1901. The two examples 
have a quite different pattern of the second abdominal segment, 
and they are in a dirty condition. 


79. PARALASTOR PLEBEIUS, sp. 1. 


2. Nigra, macula clypeicurvata basali, notis 2 postocularibus, 
duabus maculis pronotalibus, nonnunquam notis 2 scutellaribus, 
margine postico segmentorum 2 basalium abdominis angustius, 
flavis. Clypeus truncatus aut paullo antice rotundatus, fortiter 
equaliter punctatus. Frons capitis cum mesonoto dense punc- 
tata, pilisque brevioribus sat crebre vestita, scutello inermi. 
Tegule nitide, parum distincte sculpturate. Abdominis seg- 
mentum primum fortiter transversum; secundum ad_ basim 
fortiter convexum, pilis erectis brevioribus ubique, nec dense, 
vestitum ; secundum ventrale, ut in precedente formatum. 
Al fusco-hyaline, parte costali multo magis infuscata. Tibi 
tarsique rufescentes. Long. 9-10 mm. 


Hab. Adelaide, 1 9, British Museum; 1 9, Oxford Museum ; 
Victoria (Yrench), 1 ©. 


80. PARALASTOR SUBPLEBEIUS, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 15.) 


2 precedenti cognatissima, sed major, fasciis abdominalibus 
minus angustis, flavo-aurantiacis, segmento primo abdominis 
conspicue transversim depresso, facile distinguenda. Long. 
12 mm. 

This is probably the representative in Queensland of P. plebeius, 
but, apart from colour, the form of the basal abdominal segment 
is too distinct to permit the two to be considered as varieties of 
one species. 


Hab. North Queensland (Dodd), 2 2. 


81. PARALASTOR DEBILITATUS, Sp. n. 


Color fere P. pusilli Sauss. et P. simulatoris mihi. Fascize 
abdominales bicolores, antice rufescentes aut subaurantiacie, 
postice flave. -clypeus flavus, 2 parte posteriori sola flava 


612 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


aut aurantiaca. Antennarum articulus primus ¢ antice flavus, 
2 aut plus minus rufescens aut totus niger. Macule pronotales 
bicolores. Scutellum seepius binotatum, tegulis subtestaceis. 
‘Tibiz tarsique rufescentes. Species parva, angusta, clypeo et 
segmento 2 ventrali ut in spp. precedentibus formatis, forma 
gvacillimi facile distinguenda. Long. 7-8 mm. 

In this and the three preceding species the antenne are very 
clavate, the fifth joint being wider than long and the following 
becoming still more transverse. The males, except that of 
P. debilis, are not known. In this male the antenne are very 
strongly clavate, the fifth joint not longer than its apical width, 
the sixth and seventh strongly transverse. Inall there are twelve 
joints, the three apical ones recurved to form a small hook, the 
preceding one being larger, but small. The wings are nearly 
hyaline, except along the costa, in one example, darker in the 
others, which are in abraded condition. One example in the 
Oxford Museum bears a MS. name, ‘‘ Alastor pusillus Sauss.,” 
but this is clearly an error. 

Hab. Victoria (French), 2 9, in the British Museum; 1 d, 
Adelaide (Wilson), and 1 9 without locality, Oxford Museum. 


82. PARALASTOR BRUNNEUS Sauss. 


With this species is begun a short series of allied species, which 
are quite distinct from any others by the form of the second ventral 
segment, which, behind the longitudinally costate suleature, rises 
very obliquely from this to a height not, or but little, exceeding 
the level of the base of the segment. ‘he clypeus is always very 
distinctly emarginate and plentifully and coarsely punctate, the 
punctures in the male being, however, more feebly impressed than 
in the female. The tegulz, over at least a considerable part of 
their surface, always bear coarse punctures, the puncturation 
being frequently rugose, but owing to the generally pale colour 
of the surface, the puncturation is usually less conspicuous than 
it would be were the tegule dark in colour. 

Hab. Australia, 2 9 and the type in the British Museum 
(unter). 


83. PARALASTOR MULTICOLOR, Sjo ilge, (Uedle isatiegs S) 1G )5) 


Precedenti cognatissimus, sed paullo minor; Q clypeo flavo 
et macula verticis nigra, utrinque usque ad antennas producta, 
facile distinguendus. Clypeus distincte dentato-emarginatus, 
productus, minus latus, subgrosse, crebre punctatus, flavus. 
Caput cum thorace perparce, vix evidenter, pilosum. Mesonotum 
et scutellum densissime punctata, postscutello inermi. Abdominis 
segmentum primum crebre rugosim punctatum, haud transversim 
depressum ; secundum dorsale (a latere visum) fortiter sub- 
equaliter convexim curvatum; ventrale, post suleum, oblique, 
parum fortiter, elevatum, et late subdepressum; segmentum 
ultimum ventrale ¢ brevissime pubescens. - Antenne 3, ut 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 613 


apparet, tantum 10-articulate, articulis 2 ultimis minutissimis. 
Long. circiter 7-7-5 mm. 

The colour of this little Ulee is variable. The colour of the 
whole front of the head is pale (the clypeus always yellow, but 
in other parts the yellow becomes partly or wholly orange), except 
that in the female the black of the vertex is produced down 
to the antenne in two broad stripes, which sometimes become 
reddish towards the antenne. In the male the black colour is 
prolonged downwards on each side for only a short distance, 
being arcuately emarginate just in front of the anterior ocellus. 
The posterior orbits are widely yellow or orange, and connected 
with this same colour of the anterior ones. Around the ocelli 
the vertex is black, but behind these may be either black or red. 
The pronotum, senile, and propodeum (except in the posterior 
concavity) are for the most part yellow or orange, the pronotum 
sometimes more brownish or reddish posteriorly. The meso- 
notum may be all black or nearly all red. ‘The second abdominal 
segment is more or less brown or reddish in front of the orange- 
yellow apical band, sometimes nearly entirely so. The basal 
segment is yellow or orange-yellow apically, shading into brown 
or reddish, black basally. The sides of the thorax may be black 
or red, with yellow markings. Legs all pale, usually fulvous, 
with bright yellow hnes on the tibiz and femora. 

_ Very closely allied to P. brunneus, but the edges of the lateral 
deflexed parts of the clypeus are not so sharply defined, and the 
colour is very different. 

T can Ce distinguish ten joints in the male antenne, and this 
character may be peculiar to the group. 

Hab. Port Darwin (Dodd). 


84. PARALASTOR ANOSTREPTUS, Sp. ND. 


@. Nigra, clypeo, antennarum articulis duabus  basalibus, 
orbitis anterioribus et posterioribus (haud interrupte), macula elon- 
gata mediofrontal, a clypeo fere ad ocellum anteriorem extensa, 
pronoto ex maxima parte, postscutello et scutello fere totis, 
maculis magnis propodei lateralibus, parte magna mesopleurali, 
fascia latissima segmenti abdominalis primi, fascia apicali, 
utrinque subdilatata, secundi, cum pedibus omnibus, refescen- 
tibus. Segmentum abdominis tertium et sequentia, plus minusve 
colorata, Tegule brunnescentes, plus minus testacee. Clypeus 
fortiter rugoso-punctatus, apice producto, parum lato, subfortiter 
emarginatus, partibus deflexis argenteo-pubescentibus, utrinque 
in parte apicali subcarinatus. Frons densissime 1ugoso-punctata, 
pilis brevissimis vestita. Thorax haud aut vix pilosus, ubique 
densissime punctatus, postscutello inermi, propodei lateribus 
argenteo-tomentosis. Abdominis sesmentum primum cam panuli- 
forme, sat longus, subdepressus, secundum densissime punc- 
tatum, ex majore parte longitudinis fere equaliter et fortiter 
convexim rotundatum, apicem suum versus fortiter transversim 


614 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


incrassatum, margine ipso valde abrupte dejecto. Ale ubique 
fusco-nitid, parte costali saturatiore, basim versus subflavescente. 
Long. 9 mm. 


Hab. N.W. Australia, 8. Heywood I.; 1 2 in the British 
Museum. 


85. PARALASTOR DYSCRITIAS, Sp. n. 


2 precedenti forma, colore et picturatione simillima, sed 
abdominis segmento secundo ante incrassationem apicalem haud 
transversim depresso, bene distinguenda. Long. 9 mm. 


Differs slightly in colour from the preceding, as follows :— 
The markings of the head and abdomen tend to a more orange- 
red colour, and those behind the eyes do not extend beyond about 
the middle of the length of these organs. There is a roundish 
mesopleural spot beneath the tegule and only a very small one 
beneath this; the tegule are much redder, the legs paler, more 
fulvous. The apical dorsal segment is concolorous with the 
orange ones preceding it. The third antennal joint is nearly 
all red (only somewhat reddish in the other). These colour- 
differences may be quite inconstant, but in dyscritias the tegule 
are coarsely rugosely punctate over nearly the whole surface, 
smooth, shining, and sparsely punctured over a considerable area 
in anostreptus. The actual hind margin of the second segment is 
more abruptly depressed in the latter, and its incrassation is 
raised on the basal side from the general surface of the segment, 
whereas in dyscritias it is not at all defined in front from the 
rest of the surface. 

Hab. Australia, 1 2 in the British Museum, without locality. 


86. PARALASTOR XANTHOCHROMUS, sp. n. 


@. Nigra, clypeo utrinque, macula interantennali, antennarum 
articulo (ferrugineo) primo antice, maculis duabus elongatis 
postocularibus, duabusque in sinu oculorum sitis, duabus pro- 
notalibus, scutellaribus, mesopleuralibus et propodealibus flavis, 
sive aurantiaco-flavis. Abdominis segmentum primum late 
flavo-fasciatum, fascia profunde nigro-emarginata; secundum 
cum sequentibus fascia apicali ornatum. Pedes fulvescentes, 
partibus nonnullis flavescentibus. Long. 9 mm. 


Extremely close to the preceding in structure, but entirely 
different in appearance. The tegule have the same coarse 
puncturation. The clypeus is a little more strongly produced, 
and the front of the head rather more distinctly punctured, 
while the apical margin of the second dorsal segment of the abdo- 
men is less strongly and abruptly depressed. 

A single male that I possess, from Townsville, does not agree 
with either this or the preceding species, but is very like 
dyscritias 2 in its markings, which, however, are orange- 
coloured, not red, and there is a pair of large red spots towards 
the base of the second ventral segment, not connected with the 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 615 


apical band. The structure of the second dorsal segment apically 
is rather different from either species, but, in the absence of the 
male sex of the others, it is too close to be worth describing as 
distinct. This male was taken on March 15th, 1902, by Mr. F. 
P. Dodd. 

Hab. Queensiand, Cairns, 1 2. 


87. PARALASTOR PICTETI Sauss. 


With this species begins a series of allied forms, forming my 
second division. It is Saussure’s division of Alastor picteti, 
which he characterized as having the abdomen subpetiolate. 
All the specimens of picteti that I have seen come from Queens- 
land. The details of coloration in this species vary a little, and 
I think none exactly agrees with Saussure’s description. He 
gives “ Tasmania ” as the locality for his insect, but, as with 
some other species already referred to, I doubt the correctness 
of this. The tegule are for the most part smooth and polished. 

Hab. Queensland, Bundaberg and Cairns, taken by myself ; 
Mackay, three bad specimens (Z’wrner); Kuranda, May to June, 
1913, eleven examples. 


88. PARALASTOR CONSTRICTUS, Sp. n. 


@. Nigra, clypei parte basali nigra, apice lateribusque flavis, 
picturatione variabili. Macula interantennalis, margines oculares 
antice posticeque plus minus—variabiles tamen sunt—pronoti 
fascia irregularis anterior, ad tegulas lineatim utrinque producta, 
macule scutellares, postscutellares, propodeales et mesopleurales, 
segmentum abdominale (parte declivi excepta) ex majore parte 
primum, fascia secundi lata cum duabus maculis magnis basalibus, 
et segmentorum fascie sequentium, aurantiaca. Pedes fulves- 
centes, femorum parte apicali sepe flavo-notata. Antennarum 
articulus primus antice flavescens aut fulvus, flagello seepe subtus 
rufescente. Clypeus truncatus aut vix emarginatus, margine 
apicali recto aut perpaullo concavo, fortiter punctatus, punctura- 
tione minuta interstitiali distinctissima. Frons cum thorace 
pilis erectis brevioribus suberebre vestita, capite densissime punc- 
tato. Mesonotum densissime grosse punctatum, puncturatione 
distinctissima, sed subrugosa. Ale subhyaline, costali parte 
fusco-flavescente, stigmate pallido, cellula marginali infumata. 
Tegule ex magna parte leves, polite. Abdominis segmentum 
primum grosse, sepe rugose punctatum, parte basali segmenti 
secundi remote aut irregulariter punctata. Long. 9-11 mm. 


I-have seen only five examples of this species and no two are 
alike in details of markings or sculpture, but I think they 
certainly all belong to a single species. 

Hab. Queensland, Bundaberg, 2 9, taken by myself (June 
1904); 1 2, Queensland (ea coll. H. Sawnders); Mackay (Turner), 
2 Qe 


In one of my Bundaberg examples the orbits are entirely 


616 DR. R. GC. L. PERKINS ON THE 


black, in the other they are yellow from the clypeus to the middle 
of the ocular sinus; in Saunders’s example they nearly connect 
with the postocular orbital stripes. 


89. PARALASTOR MESOCHLORUS, sp. 0. 

@ precedenti cognatissima, sed pronoti maculis haud ad 
angulos humerales extensis, segmento 2 abdominalis ad basim 
nigro, aut tantum maculis rufescentibus ornato, colore primi 
leete aut pallide flavescente, distinguenda. Long. circiter 9 mm. 


This species is again variable, and there are evidently two dis- 
tinct forms of it, but the material is far too poor for a proper 
understanding either of its definite specific characters or of its 
variation. Of the typical form there are 2 males and | female. 

In the female the clypeus is almost truncate, red at the apex 
and along the sides, the antenne are red beneath, infuscate above, 
the scape and following joint less so than the others. There is a 
yellowish interantennal spot and a small orange one behind the 
eyes. The pronotum is red-marked in front medially and this 
colour extends back to the tegule very narrowly as a sutural line. 
The scutellum, postscutellum, and propodeum have large red 
markings, the tegule are reddish brown. Basal abdominal seg- 
ment above bright (slightly orange) yellow. Second with a dull 
orange band not occupying one-fourth of the segment, the 
following ones also with apical b bands. Hind tibie dark at the 
apex, at least inwardly. Mesopleura with a red spot. 

Clypeus of the male lightly emarginate, yellow, becoming red- 
dish basally at least in the middle, otherwise the head coloured 
much like that of the female. Pronotum with red markings, 
produced to the humeral angles and along the suture to the 
tegule. The other thoracic markings are like those of the female, 
iba bright yellow, a little orange- tinted, nearly concolorous with 
the basal abdominal segment; second segment either all black 
or coloured much as in the female, the basal spots reddish or 
brownish, if present. 


PARALASTOR MESOCHLORUS MESOCHLOROIDES, st. n. 


Female clypeus as in the preceding, but the coloured parts are 
yellow or partly yellow. Inner orbits with a yellow line from 
the clypeus extending into the sinus. Pronotum only with two 
obscure spots or faintly reddish on the suture medially. Thoracic 
markings bright lemon-yellow, the black median part of the pro- 
podeum less wide than in the male of the preceding, which these 
females resemble in appearance. Basal abdominal segment nearly 
concolorous with the thoracic markings. Second all black, the 
apical margin at most obscurely alee Tegule bright yellow 
inwardly, bad at the point of their deflexion less coarsely and 
deeply punctured than in the ples cans form. Male not known. 

Hab. Queensland, Mackay, 2 ¢, 1 2 typical form, in Sept. and 
Oct. 1899 (Turner); race mesochloroides, 2 © at Kuranda, Feb. 
and April, 1902 (Zurner). 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR, 617 


90. PARALASTOR DARWINIANUS, sp. n. 


@. Nigra, clypeo cum parte mandibularum basali et anten- 
narum articulo primo antice, macula mediana post clypeum, fere Ad 
ocellum anteriorem extensa, orbitis interioribus et posterioribus 
(haud una conjunctis), fascia transversa pronotali, ad tegulas 
lineatim postice producta, utrinque dilatata, fere ad mesopleura 
producta, macula mesopleurali, tegulis thoracem versus, lineis 
duabus mesonotalibus elongatis, maculis 2  scutellaribus, post- 
scutellaribus et propodealibus, margine postico sat late seemen- 
torum abdominalium, flavis. Antenne cum parte majore pedum 
brunnescentes. Abdominis segmentum primum et secundum 
brunnea, plus minus atro-suffusa. Clypeus latus, minus fortiter 
productus, nitidus, subtiliter punctatus, apice emarginato, margine 
elevatulo. Fronscum thorace breviter erecte pilosa. Mesonotum 
distincte, vix dense punctatum. Abdominis segmentum primum 
haud ubique densissime punctatum, medium subfoveatum. Alze 
subfusce, nitentes, stigmate pallido. Tegule leves, nitidissime. 
Long. vix 10 mm. 


A very distinct species. The yellow colour of the inner orbits 
curves round on each side behind the ocelli, but the extremities 
do not meet, and are well separated from the broad postocular 
stripes. 

Hab. Port Darwin, 1 2 (Dodd). 


91. PARALASTOR COMPTUS, Sp. n. 


3. Niger, clypeo, macula mediana excepta, mandibularum parte 
basali, macula elongata frontali, orbitis interioribus ad sinus 
oculorum et sinubus ipsis, macula parva verticali oculos juxta, 
orbitis posterioribus lineatim ex majore parte, pronoti margine 
antico, macula mesopleurali, tegulis ex magna parte, maculis 
duabus scutellaribus, postscutellaribus et propodealibus, margine 
postico segmentorum 2 basalium abdominis, tibize omnes externe, 
et parte exteriore femorum intermediorum, flavis. Antennarum 
flagellus subtus fulvescens, supra infuscatus, rufo-tinctus. Stigma 
alarum atrum. Clypeus distinctissime angulatim emarginatus, 
punctis majoribus sparsissimis, albo-pubescens. Mesonotum cum 
scutello profunde grosse punctatum, punctis inter se distinc- 
tissimis. Tegule ex majore parte leves et polite. Postscutelluin 
cum propodeo distincte et profunde punctatum, punctis quam 
mesonotalibus paullo minus grossis. Abdominis segmentum 
primum grossissime punctatum. Segmentum 2 ventrale post 
suleum late depressum, depressione antice elevato-marginata, 
segmento ultimo pilis sparsis erectis longioribus vestito. Long. 
7-8 mm. 


_ Var. RUBESCENS, nov. 


Pronotum ex majore parte et pars mesonoti media late, rufes- 
centia. Fascia prima abdominalis vage rufo-marginata. Seg- 
mentum secundum atro-brunneum. 


618 DR. R. CG. L. PERKINS ON THE 


I have seen only two males of this species, differing greatly in 
colour, as above described. The antenne are 11-jointed, the 
three apical ones very minute, and difficult to see in my speci- 
mens, being sunk in the apical cavity of the eighth joint. 

Hab. North Queensland, Herberton (Dodd). 


92. PARALASTOR ALEXANDRIA, sp.n. (PI. I. figs. 7, 22.) 


With this species begins a small series of forms, distinguished 
at once from any of the preceding by the sculpture of the tegule, 
which are either densely minutely punctured over nearly all their 
surface or bear coarse and conspicuous punctures, with evident 
fine ones between these, towards the outer margin on the anterior 
part. 

Brunneus, capitis vertice, nonnunquam etiam fronte, et rarius 
parte mesonoti antica, nigris. Clypeus ¢ totus, 2 utrinque, 
macula interantennali, orbitis internis et externis (nonnunquam 
vix interrupte), maculis duabus pronotalibus, mesopleuralibus, 
scutellaribus, postscutellaribus et propodealibus cum majore tegu- 
larum parte, albo-flavis. Segmenta 2 basalia postice albido-flavo 
marginata, fascia prima lata, segmentis sequentibus etiam plus 
minusve fasciatis. Antenne subtus plus minus rufescentes, 
articulo primo sepe antice albido-flavo, aut toto ferrugineo, aut 
supra nigrescente, colore variabili. Ais hyaline, parte costali 
plus minus infuseata, cellula marginali ex majore parte infuscata. 
Tibize omnes cum femoribus anterioribus et intermediis albido- 
lineatee. Clypeus distincte emarginatus, 2 remote punctatus, 
interstitiis minutissime punctatis, d obscure punctatus, punctis 
sat magnis, sed levissime impressis, ubique albo-pubescens. Caput 
cum thorace tomentosus, hoc pilis erectis perpaucis aut nullis 
vestito. _Mesonotum postice sparsim aut irregulariter punctatum, 
superficie interstitiali conspicue minute punctata. Tegule crebre 
et minutissime punctate. Abdominis segmenti secundi margo 
apicalis fortiter depressus, latus; segmentum 2 ventrale antice 
grosse, postice subtilius, punctatum. Long. 75-9 mm. 


Hab. N. Australia, Alexandria, Dec. 1905,2 9, January, 1907, 
1 Sg andl 9 (W. Stalker); Adelaide River,2 9: all in the British 


Museum. 


93. PARALASTOR ARENICOLA, Sp. n. 


Q. Caput nigrum, clypeo rufescente, utrinque flavescente ; 
lineis orbitalibus, in sinum oculorum a clypeo productis, maculaque 
interantennali, flavescentibus, lineis postorbitalibus usque ad 
verticem capitis extensis. Pronotum rufescens, antice albido- . 
flavo aut aurantiaco-flavo colore variegatum ; mesonotum nigrum, 
plus minusve rufo-suffusum aut rufo-notatum; scutellum, margine 
antico excepto, cum postscutello rufescente, ambobus flavo-bino- 
tatis. Propodeum rufescens, latera versus nonnunquam flavescens. 
Mesopleura macula flavescente ornata, rufescentia aut nigro- 
variegata. Pedes rufescentes, tibiis albido-flavo lineatis. Abdomen 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 619 


rufescens, segmento primo ante fasciam apicalem, latam, albido- 
flavam, nonnunquam nigro, secundo fascia fere simplici lata ornato, 
maculaque utrinque magna basali, pallide flava aut albida decorato. 
Clypeus levissime, sed sat distincte,emarginatus. Long. 7°5 mm. 


Allied to the preceding, with generally similar sculpture and 
the apical margin of the second abdominal segment similarly de- 
pressed and wide. Easily distinguished by the fairly numerous 
and conspicuous large punctures of the tegule, and the rougher 
postscutellum, which is rather differently formed, 

Hab. Central Australia, Hermannsburg, 2 2 (4H. J. Hillier). 
The specimens are not in very good condition, the one which is 
not mutilated being probably somewhat discoloured. 


94, PARALASTOR SIMILLIMUS, Sp. n. 


Picturatio et color fere P. constricti (q. v.), sed statura minore. 
Clypeus ¢ flavus, 2 macula parva nigrescente signatus, apice 
truncato, aut vix evidenter emarginato. 

2 clypeo obsoletius punctato (se. punctis parum fortiter im- 
pressis), antennis crassioribus, tegulis opacis aut vix unitidis, 
puncta grossiora ferentibus, distinguenda. Long. 8 mm. 


As the female of this species is unique and the male of P. con- 
strictus is unknown, I have only been able to compare this female 
example with the latter species, and unfortunately I do not feel 
quite sure that this single female belongs to the males that I a ssign 
to simillimus. On account of the better material, I have taken a 
male as the type and not this unique female. It lacks the pair of 
large basal spots on the second abdominal segment at the base and 
the tegule are less punctured than in the male. Seen in profile, 
the second segment is much more evenly rounded above than in 
P. constrictus, and this is also, to a less extent, true of the male, 

The male has the tegule very coarsely punctured over nearly the 
whole surface, the clypeal punctures are feebly impressed and the 
apex of the clypeus is truncate or almost so. The general 
sculpture is nearly the same as that of constrictus. The second 
ventral segment is not flattened or slightly depressed behind the 
transverse sulcus as it is in constrictus. The apical ventral 
segment has a very short pubescence, which is decumbent or sub- 
decumbent. 

The species is quite distinct, and it is highly probable that the 
sexes are correctly associated. 

Hab. Queensland, Mackay (Zurner), 1 g, 1 9. I took the 
former sex at Bundaberg, but no °. 


95. PARALASTOR SYNCHROMUS, Sp. n. 

Picturatio P. constricti picturationi fere similis, sed 2 clypeo 
ruto, basim versus utrinque flavo-ornato, pronoto, desuper aspecto, 
ex majore parte aut ubique colorato, rufo flavoque colore variegato, 
scutello postscutelloque flavo-fasciatis (illo haud maculis bene 


Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. XLIII. 43 


620 DR. R. C. L. PERKINS ON THE 


separatis ornato), fasciis integris, aut vix interruptis, maculis 
propodealibus rufis aut flavo-rufis, segmento 2 abdominali maculis 
basalibus carente, distinguenda. do ¢ tegulis minutissime evi- 
denter punctulatis et clypeo distinctissime emarginato, facile 
distinguendi ; a P. simillimo clypeo distincte emarginato, primo 
aspectu separandi. Long. 8-9°5 mm. 


The apical margin of the second abdominal segment is quite 
strongly depressed and rather wide; ventrally behind the sulca- 
ture it is depressed, and very remotely punctured. The apical 
ventral segment of the male is subconvex and clothed with erect, 
but not long, hairs. 

Hab. Queensland, Mackay, ¢ 9, 6 examples (Zurner) ; Bunda- 
berg, 1 ¢,1 @, and Cairns, 1 2, taken by myself. 


96. PARALASTOR LEPTIAS, Sp. n. 


Clypeus 3, macula interantennalis, linea orbitalis sinum 
oculorum intrans (nonnunquam ex parte obliterata aut rufescens), 
antennarum articulo primo ¢ antice, plerumque pallide flaves- 
centia aut albo-flava. Pronotum ex magna, aut ex majore parte, 
scutellum et postscutellum maculatim, propodeum latera versus, 
rufescentia, hic illic flavo-variegata. Tegule plus minusve flayo- 
notate. Abdominis segmenta 3 aut, 2 flavo-albido marginata, 
fasciis his antice rufo-variegatis. Pedes colore variabiles, rufes- 
centes plus minus flavo-albido-variegati, femoribus posterioribus 
plerumque nigris. Mandibule rufescentes, ¢ albido-notate. 
Clypeus 9, et antennarum articulus primus antice, rufescentes, 
illo plerumque utrinque albido-maculato. Clypeus ¢ sepe plus 
minus antice rufo-notatus. Mesopleura rufo-maculata, macula 
nonnunquam plus minus flavescente. Ale, costali parte excepta, 
parum infuscatee.—Species elongata, gracilis, abdominis segmento 
primo campanuliformi, secundo elongato, angusto, lateribus sub- 
parallelis, basim juxta angustatis. Clypeus subfortiter emar- 
ginatus. Caput cum thorace pilis brevioribus erectis vestitum. 
Mesonotum et scutellum grosse, distincte punctata, puncturatione 
mesonotali postice irregulari aut minus densa. Abdominis seg- 
mentum ventrale g apicale pilis brevissimis vestitum, leviter 
convexum. Antenne ¢ 11-articulatze, articulis 3 ultimis minimis, 
in conecavitate articuli 8 receptis. Long. 7°5-8°5 mm. 


On account of its very narrow second segment of the abdomen, 
this species appears rather out of place in this division, the first 
segment appearing less small in comparison with the hinder 
parts. It varies a good deal in details of coloration, the second 
abdominal segment sometimes having two conspicuous rufescent 
basal spots and sometimes lacking these. The lines along the 
outer orbits are usually distinctly bicolorous, and are abbreviated 
in some specimens. The tegule have a minute and plentiful 
puncturation, and generally a few larger, but feeble, punctures 
are noticeable. 

Hab. Adelaide; collected for me by some of the late T. B, 
Blackburn's pupils. 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 621 


97. PARALASTOR IGNOTUS, sp. n. 


3. Clypeus, antennarum articulus primus antice, pronotum, 
tegule, macula mesopleuralis, scutellum postscutellumque et pro- 
podeum utrinque, aurantiaco-flavescentia. Abdominis segmentum 
primum, plaga nigra basali excepta, cum pronoto fere concolor, 
secundo fascia simili, irregulari, apicali, duabusque maculis 
basalibus obscurioribus, ornato. Pedes ex majore parte aurantiaco- 
flavescentes, femoribus posterioribus nigris. Stigma alarum 
atrum. Antennarumarticulus 8 plus minus rufescens. Clypeus 
subfortiter dentato-emarginatus, subcrebre punctatus, dense 
argenteo-pubescens. Mesonotum fortiter punctatum, nitidum. 
Abdominis segmentum ultimum ventrale pilis erectis, sat con- 
spicuis, densius vestitum, subtilissime distincte punctatum. 
Tegule nitide, puncturatione minuta distincta, paucis punctis 
majoribus presentibus. Long. circiter 9 mm. 

Hab. Australia, Swan River, 1 ¢. 


98. PARALASTOR ICARIOIDES, sp.n. (Pl. I. fig. 2.) 


Colore et picturatione fere P. mesochloro var. mesochloroidet 
assimilis, maculis scutellaribus, propodealibus et postscutellaribus 
cum abdominis segmento primo citrinis, sed tegulis minute et 
copiose punctatis facillime distinguendus. 


This species varies in details of coloration, the pronotum 
above being sometimes nearly all red, sometimes only spotted 
with red in front, and may have two quite distinct yellow spots 
in the red colour. The clypeus may be entirely yellow in the male 
or yellow only at the base, the rest being reddish or brownish 
red. In the female it is usually red, sometimes, however, more or 
less yellow at the sides towards the base. The inner orbits may 
be yellow or red, or with the markings wanting. The second 
abdominal segment is all black or may become piceous along the 
apical margin, or with a brownish apical fascia. The wings are 
vellowish along the costa, the marginal cell conspicuously infumate, 
the stigma pale. The apical margin of the second abdominal seg- 
ment is strongly depressed, the flattened margin wide. Antenne 
brown, often paler beneath, sometimes nearly wholly fulvescent, 
the scape yellow in front in the male. Length 7-9 mm.; the 
former measurement from a small male. 

I have examined fourteen examples. The species is quite 
distinct from P. mesochlorus by the different scutellum, apart 
from the tegular sculpture. 

Hab. Queensland, Townsville (Dodd & Stalker); Kuranda near 
Cairns (Zurner §& Dodd); Cairns, taken by myself. 


Species que sedis incerte sunt, aut haud supra enumeratze. 


I have in the first part (g. v.) of this paper suggested the 
probable position of some of the following species or otherwise 
referred to them :— 


99. P. AUSTRALIS Sauss. 


Hab. Australia. 
43 


622 DR. R. GC. L. PERKINS ON THE 


100. P. GRUENTATUS Sauss. 
Hab. Australia. 


101. P. GR#FFEI. 
Hab. Fiji; Ovalau. 


102. P. smirut Sauss. 
Hab. Australia. 


103. P. HrRTIveNtTRIS Cameron. 
Hab. New Guinea. 


104. P. aBnormis* Bingham. 
Hab. W. Australia. 


PsEUDOZETHUS, gen. nov. 


3. Clypeus transversus, subrotundatus, clypeo generis [schno- 
celie fere similis. Mandibule breves, robustz, apice obliquo, 
dentibus 4 armato, dentibus 2 intermediis minoribus.  Palpi 
maxillares 6-articulati, articulis 4 basalibus haud multo longi- 
tudine inequalibus, his omnibus sat fortiter elongatis, articulo 
quarto duobus ultimis, una conjunctis, vix breviore. Ligula 
sat elongata, haud setosa, quam mentum circiter bis longior. 
Palpi labiales 4-articulate, articulo primo gracili, perlongo, apice 
dilatato, quam secundum (quod elongatum est, et sat robustum), 
multo longiore ; articulis 2 ultimis elongatis, gracilibus, sub- 
equalibus, una conjunctis secundo vix longioribus. Antenne 
13-articulate, articulo ultimo uncum fortem formante. Pronotum 
ad truncationem suam emarginatum, angulis distinctis, margine 
acute elevato. Postseutellum postice truncatum, desuper visum 
postice emarginatum, angulis lateralibus conspicue productis. 
Propodeum medium impressum et profunde foveolatum, impres- 
sione angustula, lateribus suis rotundatis. Abdomen ut in 
nonnullis speciebus generis Zethi formatum (cf. 7. cwrulei- 
pennis F.), Segmenti primi pars pedicellata sat elongata; pars 
postpetiolaris subglobosa, aut valde supra convexa, ante marginem 
apicalem profunde transversim sulcata. Segmentum secundum 
longe campanulatum, basi valde constricta, quasi breviter pedi- 
cellata. 

Tibie intermediz duobus calcaribus distinctis instruct. 
Alarum cellula 2 cubitalis supra brevissime petiolata. Hoe 
excepto, neuratio fere /schnocelie. Tarsorum ungues bifide. 

2 incognita. 


* T have recently been able to examine this species. Bingham’s remarks (Tr. Ent. 
Soc. 1912, p. 381) on the antennz are incorrect. In the examples he described, a 
moderately strong le1is shows the antennz to be normal for Paralastor, i.e. 11-jointed. 
The species should be placed next to P. orientalis. 


WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR. 623 


PsEUDOZETHUS AUSTRALENSIS, Sp. n. 


Niger, clypeo, linea mandibulari, articulo antennarum primo, 
pronoti fascia transversa, tegulis, maculis scutelli duabus, spinis 
postscutellaribus, tibiis, tarsis, femorumque apicibus, fascia lata 
postpetiolari et margine apicali segmentorum sequentium, colo- 
ratis, partibus nonnullis colore flavo-aurantiaco, nonnullis rufo 
decoratis. Thorax sat nitidus, grosse punctatus, propodeo rugo- 
sim punctato et opaco. Abdominis pars postpetiolaris seomenti 
primi fortiter punctatus, suleo apicali trifoveato. Segmentum 
secundum fusco-tomentosum, medium juxta marginem apicalem 
foveatum, subtilius remote punctatum, fascia apicali circa partem 
quintam segmenti occupante. Ale flavo-hyaline, costam juxta 
flavescentes. Long. 13 mm. 


The clypeus and the mandibular lines are orange-yellow, the 
other markings orange-red or red. The third abdominal segment 
is less distinctly foveate at the middle apically than the preceding 
one. Allied to Hlimus, but the spinose angles of the post- 
scutellum and the Zethus-like form of the basal abdominal 
segment are very distinctive. 


Hab. N. Queensland, Australia (F. P. Dodd). 


RHYNCHIUM AUSTRALENSE, Sp. n. 


3. Aurantiaco-flavum, clypeo, et antennarum articulo primo 
antice, flavis. Propodeum abdominisque segmenta 2  basalia 
nigra aut nigricantia. Margo apicalis segmenti primi obscure, 
secundi late, aurantiacus. Pedes posteriores ex majore parte 
nigre. Ale flavescentes, apicibus late nigris. Apex clypei 
levissime emarginatus, utrinque subcarinatus. Mesonotum minus 
grosse punctatus, postice leve et impunctatum ; seutellum im- 
punctatum ; ; propodeum rugosum, lateribus spinosis, concavitate 
sua ex majore parte levi et nitida, postice transversim oblique 
rugosa. Abdominis segmentum primum remote subtilius punc- 
tatum, secundum similiter punctatum, fascia aurantiaca partem 
circiter dimidiam apicalem occupante; segmentum apicale 
ventrale, basi excepta, pilis longioribus erectis vestitum. 

Long. 14mm. @ incognita. 

In the single example examined, the propodeum is tinged with 
ved at the sides, the mesosternum and the larger part of the 
mesopleura are black. 


Hab. North Queensland (Dodd). 


ABISPA MEADE-WALDOENSIS, Sp, 0. 


Almost exactly resembles in appearance the giant Odynerus, 
or more probably Khynchiwm, described as Abispa par aqiuides 
by Meade-Waldo, but is a true Abispa, excessively close to 
A. ephippium and perhaps only a local race of this. I can see no 
structural difference other than may well be individual. The 


624 


ON THE WASP-GENUS PARALASTOR, 


whole thorax above and beneath is brownish red, the pronotum, 
scutella, and propodeum laterally orange. The tomentum of the 
mesonotum is pale, not black as in other species, Abdomen as 
in A. ephippium. Length 24 mm. 

Hab. Port Darwin (Dodd). 


Fig. 


COmNIOoO FP w 


EXPLANATION OF THE PLATE. 


. Part of Ist and 2nd abdominal segments of P. parca Sauss., in lateral 


aspect. 1d. 1st dorsal segment; 2d. 2nd dorsal: 2v. 2nd ventral. 


. Part of the first and the following segments of P. icarivides P. The third 


and fourth segments were withdrawn within the second. 


. Part of first and second abdominal segments of P. tuberculatus Sauss., in 


lateral aspect. 


. Median longitudinal section of the 2nd ventral segment of P. olovis in 


lateral aspect (diagrammatic). 


. The same of P. tricolor LP. 
. The same of P. solitarius P. 


The same of P. alexandrie P. 


. The same of P. mutabilis P. 

. The same of P. multicolor P. 

. Apex of clypeus of P. imitator, very lightly emarginate. - 

. The same of P. dentiger, somewhat strongly emarginate. 

. The same of P. optabilis (clypeus quasi tri-dentatus). 

. The.same of P. atripennis (also quasi tri-dentatus). 

. The same of P. pseudochromus (clypeus fortissime emarginatus). 

. The same of P. subplebeius; clypeus truncate, but slightly rounded. 
. The same of P. oloris (clypeus recte truncatus). 

. The five apical joints of the antenne of P. punctulatus 3. 

. The small 9th, 10th and 11th antennal joints of P. hilaris, and the apical 


portion of the 8th, in the terminal cavity of which the others lie. 


. Three terminal joints of P. multicolor, the two latter very small and 


lying in the apical cavity of the 8th. 


. Tegula of P. debilis, showing the coarse puncturation of its outer portion. 
. The same of P. orientalis. The coarse punctures are uot equally 


numerous in all examples, but the sculpture is very different from that 
of species which have the tegulz very minutely punctured. 


. The same of P. alexandria. ‘The other parts of the tegul are, of course, 


sculptured, but only that part (or some of that part) which gives the 
best specific characters in different species is shown in this and the 
preceding figures. 


P. Z. S.1914, MONTAGUE, P1. I. 


Bale & Danielsson, Itt 


REPTILIA ETC., FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 


‘LSAN NI SISNATIATAN SOLAYVITVH NOICGNVd DONNOA 


pil ‘wossjetued y aed 


Siig, 


WL “Tet “SION ULINGOWNT “HALL IS) ZL 


TALS vOOOMAT “Siar = tOr san Mess. Sei 


oat “moOSssTeatueq W Ile 


“TH el “SNOW GINOIN, “WISL -S “ZZ ‘at 


GNvVaisl Hive wo NOMVLaoash ¥  NOOD vy anion 


pyl ‘wossrerueqd B ee 


ralicns 


NEES 


MU el “SOOWV INOW “HIS “SS “A “al 


ON THE FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS, 625 


35. A Report on the Fauna of the Monte Bello Islands. 
By P. D. Monracun, B.A., Gonville and Caius College, 
Cambridge *. 

[Received March 18, 1914; Read June 9, 1914.] 
(Plates I-IV.+) 


INDEX. Pace 
Moute Bello Islands: Physical; geographical .................. 625 
Systematic : 
WEVOTTTAITEY  Sadecoconisd-cedaeos usadaanteleeeadanadaa se case uct ae ere HT3.0) 
Myo RUOPSi An nOOY CES, Se Ma ase ea ea eeeeeseteesces.0ce-) O42 
Risces on mdalacoonss el (Ca alate Recaniy)i esses scycee. 2. | G50 
Uh OPAL OCE Ameer nessee eee eee cones cma e nc tect near eaten cet OLA! 
THIGE GOCE. Gasicks Sobers codtodined doupaeatae aCe Sas E AR oe aneee =, a emetenmT of 159 
Melicleptrianalovuenatcsps Ml. seen eee eee. O46 
AUP OTQTE PFA OOCHHES. (0% TNS oan cceeedasbouasengucereonsesoecee ene | LOLs 
WGleop erat ae tee tee esterase ce ih esate GAG 
Orthop herageerantecsacecs eects eae eee ce det amends ML GAS 
iv men op benam a7 praaseenes -cteme. garth teal ach same Net citer ee VGA 
Wivrmayyool, — (Dir, Ireveypralbia)) » co. cocstossoeeosassobopoucerasceacan’ (eo) 
Stomimamy ainGl Comets 5. s0-cceosssocccelsedososcessovensunscae, Bd) 


Off the coast of Western Australia, from the North-West Cape 
to Port Walcott, there stretches an archipelago of small desert 
islands, the zoology of which has been but little investigated. 
Lying as they do, in a shallow sandy sea, and for the most part 
in sight of the low shores and mangrove-swamps of the mainland, 
it is unlikely that their fauna should exhibit any marked insular 
characters, but they offer great opportunities of considering the 
typical forms which inhabit them in relation to their somewhat 
peculiar environmental conditions. Of all these islands the 
Monte Bello Group is the most isolated, and so from its position 
the most likely to repay investigation. 

Mr. T. H. Haynes, a gentleman engaged in experimenting 
upon the artificial cultivation of Pearl Oysters, was for some 
time living upon these islands, and in his leisure collected 
various zoological specimens, which he sent to the British and 
West Australian Museums. His house was subsequently wrecked 
by a eyclone, and he was obliged to abandon his investigations. 
Since many of Mr. Haynes’ specimens presented features of 
interest, Mr. Bernard Woodward, Director of the West Australian 
Museum, thought it desirable that the group should be thoroughly 
investigated, and a grant was offered for the purpose. As this 
was insufficient a special application was made to the Royal 
Society, resulting in a further grant of £50. These grants 

* Communicated by Prof. J. Srantey GarpineR, M.A., F.R.S., F.Z.S. 
+ For explanation of the Plates see p. 652. 


626 MR. P. D. MONTAGUE ON THE 


enabled the writer, accompanied by Mr. L. Burns, of Perth, W.A., 
as assistant, to spend from May 29th to August 29th, 1912, 
collecting upon the islands. Mr. Burns has since been drowned 
while duck-shooting at the Forrest River, near Wyndham. He 
was a very able collector and a delightful companion. 

I must here acknowledge the very great assistance received 
from Professor Stanley Gardiner at home, from Mr. Woodward 
and Mr. W. B. Alexander in Western Australia, and from 
Mr. Gregory Mathews and workers in various departments of 
the British Museum (Natural History), who have so kindly helped 
in identifying the specimens. 


A detailed description of a local fauna is incomplete without 
some account of its environment; it is therefore necessary to 
consider the prevailing physical conditions and geographical 
features of the locality before proceeding to an account of the 
various forms inhabiting it. 

The group lies approximately in lat. 20° 25’ S., long. 115° 30! E., 
105 miles E.N.E. of North-West Cape, and 40 miles from the 
mouth of the Fortescue River—the nearest point on the main- 
land. It is near this latitude that the rainfall on the West 
Australian coastal region reaches its minimum, averaging under 
8 inches per annum; it is of very irregular occurrence, droughts of 
two or even three consecutive years being not infrequent. The 
rain falls in the summer, usually in January or February, and is 
frequently attended by a particularly severe form of’ eyclone 
known locally as a ‘ Willi-willi.” These storms strike the West 
Australian coast between latitudes 18° and 23°, and cause much 
destruction to buildings and shipping. Their wind velocity has 
never been accurately measured, but lines of short iron telegraph- 
poles bent in the middle through as much as 45° testify to the 
force attained. Cyclones may occur between November and 
March; from mid-April until October, comparatively calm and 
dry weather may be depended upon. During these months there 
are occasional winter showers, which become more frequent and 
regulay further from the coast. Hence the islands are favoured 
with’ a slightly higher rainfall, and the vegetation is in conse- 
quence a little more luxuriant and less scattered than that of the 
mainland in the corresponding latitude. Though these showers 
are refreshing when they do occur, they are really very scanty, 
and contribute but little to the average, for the bulk of the rain 
falls in one or more tropical downpours during the course of a 
few hours. 

The temperature is not excessive; during our visit the shade 
temperature at mid-day averaged 82°3°, never rising above 
90-0° F. 

The geological formation throughout is of sandy post-tertiary 
limestone, similar to that of the mainland, which extends in an 
interrupted belt down the greater length of the west coast of the 
continent, and is supposed to have accumulated by wind-action. 


FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 627 


The Monte Bello rock is comparatively poor in Foraminifera, 
but contains numerous fragments of broken shell. Most of the 
lime is concentrated near the surface, and the bare hill-tops on 
Hermite Island are covered in places with an extremely dense 
and hard marble-like surface deposit, only a few inches in thick- 
ness, formed by rapid surface-evaporation drawing up the water 
from the lower levels and depositing its mineral contents. 

The main geographical features of the group are indicated on 
any map. It lies at the northern extremity of an extensive 
shoal, which stretches in a southerly direction to within fifteen 
miles of the mouth of the Robe River, including Barrow, a com- 
paratively large island lying twelve miles S. by S.W. of the 
Monte Bello Group. The southern portion of this shallow area, 
known as Barrow Island Shoals, has soundings of 23 fathoms, 
and dries in patches at low water. This closely approaches 
another bank, which lies between the mouths of the Cane and 
Robe rivers, including the Mary Anne Islands. The passage 
between these shoals is only four miles wide, and nowhere more 
than nine fathoms in depth. Half encircling the Monte Bello 
Group on the north and west sides is Breakin’s Reef, which is the 
actual limit of the bank. It is nota coral formation, although 
there are plenty of corals upon it, and it dries in patches at low 
water with the spring tides. Outside the ‘reef? soundings of 
40-50 fathoms are struck almost immediately. It seems likely 
that this shallow area at one time formed an extensive triangular 
cape, of which the Monte Bello Islands formed the northern 
extremity, having become separated at a comparatively recent 
period. Barrow Island was probably connected with the Monte 
Bello Islands long after its separation from the mainland, a 
supposition supported by zoological evidence hereafter to be 
dealt with. 

It will be weil now to describe the respective characters of the 
two main islands, Hermite and Trimouille. 

Hermite Island, the largest and most fertile, measures rather 
over six miles from N. to S., and about one and three-quarters 
across at its widest part. The coast-line is irregular, and ex- 
tensive shallow inlets run far inland amongst low undulating 
hills, nearly dividing the island longitudinally into an Eastern 
anda Western portion. The coasts facing the open sea are rocky 
and irregular, with low rugged cliffs and stony beaches; but 
the shores of the inlets are regular and characteristic, the hills 
sloping down to a flat rocky terrace, which is bare of vegetation 
and washed by the sea at very high tides in windy weather. 
This terrace descends nearly perpendicularly to the regular tidal 
flat, and its edge is much undercut, owing to the tides which flow 
swiftly up and down the long and narrow inlets, and to the 
absenee of big seas, which would break up the configuration. 
Since these inlets are locally called ‘lagoons,’ I shall continue to 
speak of them as such, though they have nothing to do with the 
true lagoons associated with coral formations. In the sheltered 


628 MR. P. D. MONTAGUE ON THE 


bays and inlets, there are growths of ‘mangrove’ comprising 
an Avicennia, which grows to a considerable size and forms a 
belt of varying width skirting the sandy flats Just below high- 
water mark. Further out in the lagoon, the Avicennia gives place 
suddenly to a true mangrove of the genus Bruguiera, which forms 
another zone, and at the head of the large lagoon extends right 
across to the Avicennia belt along the opposite shore. 

The highest point on the island is 180 feet above sea-level. 
Though the hills and ridges are low, their slopes are steep, with 
much bare and weathered rock showing between the scanty 
vegetation, The level plains are covered with a light, sandy, red 
soil, very fertile when sufficiently watered. The vegetation is of 
a type known collectively as ‘ Spinifea-serub,’ which covers large 
tracts of north-western Australia. Spinifex is the predominant 
plant over most areas; it grows in dense prickly tufts and 
patches, in some places the shrubs so close together that walking 
amongst them is a tortuous and somewhat painful business. 
Next in abundance to the Spinifex is Myoporwm acununatum, 
a shrub with bright green foliage and small white tlowers, very 
attractive to Lycenid butterflies. An Olearia is also common ; 
it is a tall and wiry shrub, with insignificant flowers, and 
small and rather scanty linear leaves, giving little cover. The 
branches generally bear the large cobwebs of a big and handsome 
spider, Vephyla meridionalis. Of the less abundant shrubs must 
be mentioned a Cassia, apparently near C. oligvelada, and a species 
of Croton (Kuphorbiacez), a coarse, rough bush, generally affecting 
the upper slopes of the ridges. Characteristic of the areas 
along the shores may be mentioned a Chenopodiaceous plant, 
Rhagodia billardieri R. Br., forming a bush of moderate pro- 
portions with clusters of inconspicuous green flowers, attractive to 
insects. The almost universally distributed Salsola hah, Linn., 
occurs abundantly, and Frankenia pauciflora grows commonly on 
the limestone rocks, around the sheltered lagoons being seen in 
isolated patches almost down to the water’s edge. Of the more 
abundant herbaceous plants may be mentioned T'richolesma 
seylanicum R. Br., which usually stands alone or in loose clusters 
on bare patches of soil, its bright blue flowers very conspicuous. 
A species of Senecio is also rather common, remarkable in that it 
usually forces its way up through dense patches of Spinifex. 

This brief account of the characteristic vegetation applies only 
after a period of drought, such as there had been previous to our 
visit to the islands. A good shower had fallen in April 1912, 
but it was in all probability insufficient to bring up the majority 
of the herbaceous annuals, which are short-lived, and flourish 
only for a month or two after the heavy tropical rains. At such 
times the island may present a different aspect. 

There is no surface-water on Hermite—or in fact, on any of 
the islands—during the dry season; our water-supply was 
derived from a well, which had ‘been sunk for fifteen feet through 
the porous rock, and which yielded us a permanent though scanty 


FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 629 


supply. After the rains, water may be obtained from surface- 
diggings in the sand-hills situated to the west side of the island. 

Trimouille in many respects differs markedly from Hermite 
Island. The coast-line is far more regular, and there is but one 
inlet. This is quite unlike the lagoons of Hermite, for there are 
no rocky margins, and the dunes rise directly from shores of 
white sand. It forms, in fact, a more or less circular bay, with 
a narrow entrance. From the south side there runs off a tidal 
creek, around which there is a considerable growth of mangrove, 
but the Avicennia and Brugwera are intermixed, and do not 
form separate zones. The vegetation here is also peculiar, con- 
sisting almost entirely of Chenopodiaceous plants comprising 
both shr ubs and herbs, mostly of the genus Atriplex, A. isatidea 
Mog. covering large areas of the sandy foreshore. 

This particular spot is the chief haunt of a small bird, Zon- 
eginthus castanotis roebucki, which though widely distributed on 
the mainland, is in the Monte Bello Group confined to Trimouille, 
though individuals occasionally cross over to South-East Island, 
which lies off its south-eastern end. (See p. 636.) 

Nearly the whole of Trimouille is covered with blown sand, 
which towards the north-western end has collected into dunes 
of considerable size, two of which are particularly prominent, 
the largest rising to a height of 120 feet. At the foot of this 
hill, fresh water can be permanently obtained by shallow digging. 
The sand at the south-eastern extremity of the island is very 
coarse in texture, almost gravel, becoming gradually finer 
towards the north-western end. This sifting effect, due to the 
wind, was possibly of only a temporary nature, the result of a 
recent gale. 

As might be anticipated, the vegetation is far less luxuriant 
and more scattered than on Hermite Island, though it is quite as 
varied. Spinifex is much in evidence, and on the sand-hills 
facing the sea one frequently meets with the widely-distributed 
Tpomeca pes-capre, growing in a form with immensely long 
trailing stems, with erect tufts of glossy green leaves and pink 
flowers, separated by internodes as much as 20 feet in length. 
Ls ribulus cistoides Linn., Boerhaavia diffusa Linn., and B. mesic 
are all common, the latter often trailing up over the shrubs like 
a regular climber, though it grows equally well alone. 

Of the smaller islands little need be said, for they embody to 
a greater or lesser extent characteristics already deseribed. There 
is quite a varied flora on some of the smallest outlying islets, for 
the soil has an extra fertility imparted to it by the *mutton- 
birds,’ which breed in large numbers in burrows in the sand and 
holes in the rocks. 


In the following survey of the animals represented, stress has 
been laid upon small differences which may indicate zoological 
isolation, and trinomials have been adopted wherever it was 
thought desirable, but only where the series show uniformity. 


630 MR. P. D. MONTAGUE ON THE 


Owing to the general scarcity of life, in consequence of the arid 
conditions prevailing, it was often not possible to get a really 
sufficient number of specimens. Particularly in the case of 
insects, the matter is complicated by the fact that, where there 
is no great abundance of individuals, any collected at the same 
time and place are liable to be of the same brood. Thus all may 
exhibit a slight peculiarity, and give a false impression of 
uniformity in a character which may really be quite exceptional. 


MAMMALIA. 


There are now two indigenous animals inhabiting these islands, 
a Hare Wallaby, Lagorchestes conspicillatus (Gould)*, and a Bat, 
Liptesicus pumilus Gray. There was formerly a Bandicoot, 
Isoodon barrowensis 'Thom., which until very recently inhabited 
Hermite Island, but has now been exterminated. 

Of introduced species, cats and black rats (J/, rattus rattus) 
are numerous, and, as in other places, doing great damage 
to the endemic fauna, The brown rat (J/. decwmanus) has already 
established itself in a store-shed used by one of the pearling fleets, 
but it does not appear to be thriving, for all the examples 
observed were in a weak and diseased condition. 


1. LAGoRcHEsTES consPicILLatus (Gould). 


This species is closely allied to the more slender and agile 
rufous-coloured “subspecies” ZL. c. leichardti, which is widely 
distributed over tropical Australia. It is now confined to 
Hermite and Barrow Islands, and Mr. Oldfield Thomas, who has 
kindly identified the species, can detect no difference between 
examples from the two localities. There is a specimen in the 
British Museum, a co-type from the Gould collection, which is 
recorded as having been obtained from ‘ Trimouille I., Dampier 
Archipelago.” It is more than likely that this is a Monte Bello 
example, for there is no island of that name in the Dampier 
Archipelago, and on some of the older charts the Monte Bello 
Group is represented by a single island named ‘Trimouille. 
Whether it actually came from Trimouille, and not from Hermite 
Island, it is impossible to decide, but at the present time the 
species lives only on the latter, though old pearlers say that it 
was formerly abundant on the former. The majority of known 
specimens are from Barrow Island, where the species stil! occurs ; 
I am aware of no other locality. 

In habits it is nocturnal, hiding by day amongst the thick 
Spinifex-tutts, and coming out just after sunset to feed upon the 
bark and young shoots and foliage of various herbs and bushes. 
It is unlikely that it will exist for many years longer, as 


* The parentheses around the names of authors placed after scientific names im 
this paper are used in accordance with Article 23 of the International Rules of 
* Nomenclature (Proc. 7th Int. Cong. Boston, 1907, p. 44 (1912))—Eprtor. 


FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 631 


it is one of the most defenceless animals that can well be 
imagined. It is easily dislodged from its hiding-place amongst 
the Spinifex, from which it often rises in an awkward fashion, 
tripping up and rolling over before getting away. Though it is 
able to hop swiftly for a short distance, it rapidly becomes ex- 
hausted, and is not difficult to obtain by simply running after 
it and catching it by the tail. 

The breeding:season appears to be during the summer and is 
possibly dependent upon the rains, for we saw no half-grown 
specimens, and as the rains of the previous summer had failed, 
they may not have bred at all. It is possible, however, that the 
eats had accounted for all the young ones. The pouches of all 
the females were empty, but in the middle of August males and 
females were often seen in pairs. 

The species under consideration offers a very striking example 
of “degeneration” resulting from isolation and consequent 
absence of enemies. Owing to the lack of surface-water upon 
these islands, it has never had to face the dingo and the 
aborigines, who would make short work of an animal so easily 
caught. It is remarkable that it has been able to brave the 
climatic conditions for so long, and has not succumbed to a par- 
ticularly severe drought or cyclone. ‘The identity of this species 
with that of Barrow Island indicates a comparatively recent 
land-connection, but from all the other smaller islands, which 
presumably formed part of the same land-mass, the species has 
disappeared. 


9. IsooDON BARROWENSIS Thom. 


Only shrivelled skins and bones of this species were discovered, 
but skulls correspond in all essentials with specimens from Bar- 
row Island, with which it is in all probability identical. The 
cats have evidently been responsible for its extermination. Its 
distribution corresponds exactly with that of the species last 
described, and here again it is quite distinct from the corres- 
ponding mainland form. 


3. Epresicus PUMILUS Gray. 


This little bat occurs on the North-West Australian mainland, 
and is not uncommon over the whole Monte Bello Group, 
appearing upon the wing about sunset. It was generally 
observed near rocks and cliffs, where it probably spends the 
day. 


Introduced species.—It is curious to find Mus rattus particularly 
common on the small outlying islands of the group which have 
never been inhabited, frequenting the beaches and sand-hills 
near the coast. It occurs on practically every island, and its 
presence is attributed to a pearling-schooner which was wrecked 
some twenty years ago. All the specimens we obtained were 


632 MR. P. D. MONTAGUE ON THE 


well-grown examples of typical J. rattus, with long black fur 
and dark grey underparts—not the brown, light-bellied var. 
alexandrinus which is more usually found in such situations. 
They appeared to feed upon small crabs on the shores between 
the tide-marks, and to derive their water-supply from gnawing 
the stems and leaves of succulent plants. Their tracks were very 
noticeable on the sand-hills, in some places forming well-worn 
paths, which usually led to holes in the rocks, where they 
breed. 

The cats which have been introduced into Hermite Island 
appear to be breeding rapidly ; wherever introduced they soon 
become exceedingly shy and wary, and grow to a very large size. 
They will, no doubt, in a few years time have accounted for the 
wallabies, as they have for the bandicoots. If they cannot kill 
a full-grown wallaby—though I am inclined to believe they do— 
they make short work amongst the young ones. 


AVES. 


In the following notes, the nomenclature adopted is that of 
Mr. Gregory Mathews, to whom I am greatly indebted for his 
very kind assistance in identification. The numbers after the 
names given in the notes on the different species refer to 
Mathews’ *‘ Reference List of the Birds of Australia,” 1912. 


LAND BIRDS. 


1, GEOPELIA HUMERALIS HEADLANDI. 50 B. Pale Barred- 
shouldered Dove. 


Compared with the type, these birds agree in all necessary 
detail. The species frequents the more bushy parts of the islands, 
feeding upon fallen berries and seeds. They roost and nest in 
the mangroves, constructing a loose platform of sticks amongst 
the branches, upon which two white eggs are laid. The nesting- 
season is dependent upon the rains, occurring usually in January 
or February, but after a shower of rain on July 8th, 1912, the 
males at once began to show signs of courtship, and by the end 
of the month a small percentage of the birds were breeding. 

Individuals were nearly always to be seen around the well and 
an abandoned water-tank containing brackish water, into which 
they used to fly to drink and bathe. The problem at once sug- 
gests itself as to how they fared before these tanks were built. 
The dews are usually heavy, and the smaller birds were some- 
times observed drinking the dew-drops from the bushes in the 
early morning, but, when the easterly winds are blowing, this 
source fails entirely for days in succession. The only other 
species which frequented artificial water-supplies is the little 
“ finch,” Zoneginthus castanotis roebucki, which visited the 
“ well” on Trimouille in flocks. Although at the time of our 
arrival the well was choked, and several inches of material had 


FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 633 


to be removed before any water collected at all, yet the damp 
sand was pitted and scored all over the surface by the beaks of 
birds. 

The distribution of this dove ranges from about Sharks Bay 
to the mouth of the Shaw River. 

3: wing 137 mm.; culmen 18; tarsus 21°. 

fe) 4 | WEBI mms 7G LS 20. 

Iris orange-red; bill dark slate-colour; feet salmon-pink, 
claws black. 


9. FIALCYON SANCTUS WESTRALASIANUS. 557. Western Sacred 
Kingfisher. 

Halcyon westralasianus Campbell, Emu, vol. i. p. 25, 1901. 

One specimen, not fully adult, agrees with specimens from 
S.W. Australia rather than with H. s. ramsayi Mathews, from 
the N.W. of the continent. The specimen was shot in its haunts 
among the mangroves, where it did not seem to beat all common. 

@ (immature): wing 90 mm. ; culmen 36; tarsus 12. 

Tris brown; bill slaty black, pale at base of lower mandible ; 
feet brown, claws black. 


3. Halcyon SORDIDUS MELVILLENSIS. 560A. Northern Man- 
grove Kingfisher. 
Mathews, Austral Avian Record, vol. 1. p. 38, 1912. 


Two immature examples agree in size and general appearance 
with birds from Melville Island. The specimens were obtained 
amongst the thick mangroves of Hermite. 

Q (immature): wing 97 mm.; culmen 49; tarsus 13. 

Tris brown ; bill slaty black, pale at base of lower mandible ; 
feet brown, claws black. 


4. CHRYsococcyx BASALIS WYNDHAMI. 586. Western Narrow- 
billed Bronze Cuckoo. 


Five examples of this bird, from the unbarred immature form 
to the fully adult, agree with the western bird described by 
Mathews. ‘The species was found only upon Hermite, where it 
is not uncommon, especially in the dense mangrove-forest at the 
head of the Large Lagoon. It is a shy bird, but usually betrays 
its presence by its shrill note—a clear whistle several times 
repeated. 

S (adult): wing 104 mm. ; culmen 12; tarsus 18. 

Q (adult): ,, O(joumy ES Pep betrays 

Tris dull orange-red ; culmen dark brown ; feet brown. 

Young : iris grey. 

5. PACHYCEPHALA RUFIVENTRIS COLLETTI. 698A. Northern 


Thickhead. 


Mathews, Austral Avian Record, vol. i. p. 41, 1912; Parry’s 
Creek, North-West Australia. 


634 MR. P. D. MONTAGUE ON THE 


An immature male resembles the north-western bird described 
by Mathews as above. 

The specimen was shot late in June. It was in company with 
several others of the same species, but, before or after that date, 
no others were seen. It is probably a casual visitor to the 
islands. 

S (immature): wing 91 mm.; culmen 13; tarsus 20. 

Iris brown; culmen light brown, dark at tip; feet dark 
brown. 


6. EPTHIANURA- TRICOLOR pDisTINcTA. 845. Northern Tri- 
coloured Chat. 


One male example has a much darker back than the type of 
the above bird; darker, indeed, than any specimens examined, 
but the species is variable in this respect. 

The species occurs very sparingly upon Hermite; only two 
examples were observed, frequenting the thick bushy localities 
on the east of the island. 

3: wing 69 mm.; culmen 13°5; tarsus 19°5. 

Iris brown; culmen dark brown ; feet dark brown. 


7. EREMIORNIS CARTERI ASSIMILIS. Island Desert Bird. 
Montague, Austral Avian Record, vol. i. p. 181, 1913. 

Differs from JZ. c. carteri in its smaller size, proportionately 
larger bill, and in the colour of the head, which is of a deeper 
and richer chestnut-brown. 

The mainland representative (2. c. carteri) is a somewhat scarce 
bird inhabiting the Spinzfex-country in the region of North-West 
Cape. The Monte Bello form is found principally upon the 
Spinifes-plains of Hermite, where it is rather common, It fre- 
quents the low scrub, slipping with ease and rapidity amongst the 
very thickest and most prickly bush, making goo use of its long 
tail to guide and balance itself in so doing. Occasionally it will 
appear for an instant at the summit of a bush or tuft, utter a 
harsh clucking note, and disappear almost immediately, or make 
a short and hurried flight to the next thicket. 

3: wing 60 mm.; culmen 12; tarsus 19-5. 
OR era comin, ae, | sob Miers 
Iris brown ; culmen dark brown ; tarsus brown. 


8. ARTAMUS LEUCORHYNCHUS HARTERTI. 992. Western White- 
rumped Wood-Swallow. 


This bird belongs to the West Australian form described by 
Mathews. It was met with commonly upon all the islands, 
usually to be seen hawking insects upon the wing, or, towards the 
middle of the day, resting upright upon bare twigs or stumps, in 
parties of three or four toa dozen. It would often accompany 
us while walking over the plains, and catch insects as they were 
dislodged from the Spinifex. 


FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 635 


9. ZOSTEROPS LUTEA BALSTONI, 1099. Carnarvon White-eye. 


Zosterops balstoni Grant, Ibis, 1909, p. 663. 

Specimens agree with the type of the above bird from Car- 
narvon, North-West Australia. The species is a small, dull- 
coloured form of Zosterops lutea Gould, though it would be more 
correct to look upon the type lutea as an island form of the far 
more widely distributed balstoni. It is much the most numerous 
bird inhabiting the Monte Bello Group, living upon all the 
islands, however small, where there is sufficient scrub to afford 
food and protection. It appears to be omnivorous in diet, feeding 
upon berries and seeds, and searching for insects amongst the 
foliage of the mangroves, in the vicinity of which it is always to 
be seen. 

The nesting season is probably in October. In August, the 
males were in full song, and at the end of that month a half- 
constructed nest was discovered, suspended amongst the foliage 
of a dense Druguiera, but it was not completed when I left. 

3: wing 57 mm.; culmen 9:5; tarsus 17. 

Oe =, OO Taming stare OR Mk Aen cal Liiy 

Iris brown ; bill ath feet dark brown. 


10. STIGMATOPS INDISTINCTA PERPLEXA. 1201. Allied Least 
Honey-eater. : 

The specimens agree with birds from mid-Westralia. On the 
Monte Bello Islands the species was met with exclusively in the 
larger mangrove-forests of Hermite, frequenting the densest 
parts of the Brugwiera-zone. During July and August the males 
were in full song. The song is particularly pleasing, s somewhat 
suggestive of that of the European Reed-Warbler, but more 
musical and less harsh. When singing amongst the dense and 
tangled vegetation the bird is extremely difficult to locate. 

3d: wing 69 mm.; culmen 14°5; tarsus 20. 

Oar Oormmn: af WA Oe eee OHSe 

Iris greyish brown ; bill blackish brown; feet dark brown. 


11. ANTHUS AUSTRALIS MONTEBELLI, Montebello Pipit. 
Montague, Austral Avian Record, vol. i. p. 181, 1913. 


This is a pale subspecies, in which the dark centres of all the 
feathers are much reduced, and the spotting on the breast is 
comparatively sparse. It lacks any rufous tinge. 

This is a common bird over the whole group, being perhaps 
especially abundant upon’ Trimouille. It is the only species of 
land-birds which was observed to fly from island to island over 
passages more than two hundred yards across. It was met 
with everywhere on the open country, both on the rocky hill- 
slopes and on the sandy plains. 

3: wing 89 mm.; culmen 12; tarsus 24. 

Oe CONNIE TAS Sa eis aller 18 

Iris brown ; bill black ; feet light brown. 

Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. XLIY. 44 


636 MR. P. D. MONTAGUE ON THE 


12. ZoNEGINTHUS CASTANOTIS ROEBUCKI. 1347. Dark Chest- 
nut-eared Finch. 


This bird resembles the form from Roebuck Bay in being dark 
above, and in having the dark ear-patch. The species in its 
various forms is widely distributed over the Australian continent. 
On the Monte Bello Group it is confined to Trimouille and South- 
East Island. Its head-quarters is the lagoon towards the north-. 
west end of the island, which has already been described. Large, 
loose spherical nests, composed of dry herbaceous stems and lined 
with feathers and soft grass, were often to be met with amongst 
the branches of Avicennia, and one was found amongst the rocks 
under an overhanging cliff-edge. They contained no eggs; the 
breeding- season probably commences in October. 

dé: wing 99 mm.; culmen 10; tarsus 14. 
QS 48 Bane oe LA ie eae onae Mel bs 155 

Iris orange-red ; bill orange; feet flesh-colour. 


Land-birds alone are likely to furnish indications of zoological 
isolation and pre-existing land-connections. It will be seen that, 
with one exception, the above list only comprises birds which 
inhabit the North-West of Western Australia. ‘The exception 
is Halcyon sanctus westralasianus, the subspecies inhabiting 
the South-Western region. The fact is of interest, as one would 
naturally have expected to find H. s. ramsayi, the North- 
Western bird, and the occurrence of South-Western forms on 
the Monte Bello Group is found also in the invertebrate fauna. 
Of the peculiar forms, Hremiornis carteri assimilis might have 
been anticipated, as it is a bird addicted to one locality and 
apparently incapable of prolonged flight. It has not been re- 
ported from Barrow Island, however, where there occurs in its 
stead a blue JdZalwrus, which is absent from the Monte Bello 
Group. It is curious, on the other hand, that a bird so 
widely distributed and strong on the wing as Anthus australis 
should be also represented by a readily distinguished subspecies, 
whereas the Zosterops, a no less characteristic and abundant 
bird, of a genus quite remarkable for its insular forms, should be 
identical in every respect with the type from Carnarvon. 


SEA-BIRDS, WADERS, AND BIRDS OF PREY. 


13. HYDROPROGNE TSCHEGRAVA STRENUA. 128. Caspian Tern. 

Sylochelidon strenwus Gould, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1846. 

This bird is distributed around the coasts of South and 
Western Australia, and was found in scattered pairs frequenting 
the low flat islets at the north of the group. A single half- 


erowh young one was discovered among the rocks on a beach of 
Trimouille, at the end of July. 


FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 637 


14. BRUCHIGAVIA NOVE-HOLLANDLE LONGIROsSTRIs. Silver Gull. 


B. longirostris Masters, Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S. W., vol. ii. 
pe flsy lsat 

The range of the form extends from 8.W. to N.W. Australia. 
Around the Monte Bello Islands it is not abundant ; the whole of 
the north-western region is, in fact, remarkable for the comparative 
scarcity of sea-birds, in spite of the existence of extensive flats and 
shallows which ought to furnish an abundant food-supply. 

A few old nests, apparently of this species, were found upon 
Long Island and several of the outlying rocks, and the 
breeding-season is said by the pearlers to be in December and 
January. The nesting-time of the gulls varies enormously and 
individually upon the various island groups around the West 
Australian coast, occurring, it would appear, any time between 
October and April. 


15. H#®MATOPUS LONGIROSTRIS. 


Fairly numerous around the sandy shores and mud-flats, 
feeding in small parties, often in company with the next species. 


16. H#MATOPUS UNICOLOR OPHTHALMICUS. 


The Montebello Sooty Oystercatcher is the bird described as 
above, distinguished from H. w. berniert by the bare orange-red 
space around the eyes. It is really a North Australian bird, 
and the Monte Bello Islands must be near the southern limit of 
its range, H. w. berniert being the typical West Australian form. 


17. EKupopa Georrroyi. 201. Large Sand Dottrel. 

Charadrius geoffroyi Wagler, Syst. Av., Charadr. sp. 19, 1827 ; 
Java. 

The distribution is from Southern Siberia southwards to 
Australia, where it occurs during summer, and in the northern 
part of which it has often been taken in full breeding plumage. 

Observed in small numbers, usually feeding in company ‘with 
EH. mongolus and C. ruficupillus on the tidal flats of Hermite, 
throughout June, July, and August. The specimen obtained 
was shot on July 9th. 

3d: wing 133mm.; culmen 23; tarsus 33. 

Bill dark brown; iris brown; feet dark brown, claws black. 


18. EKupropa Moncouus. 202. Mongolian Sand Dottrel. 


Charadrius mongolus Pallas, Reise Russ. Reichs, vol. ii. 
p. 700, 1776 ; Mongolia. 

The same remarks apply as to the former species. 

@: wing 129 mm.; culmen 17:5; tarsus 30. 


19. CHARADRIUS RUFICAPILLUS TORMENTI Mathews. 205. Pale 
Red-capped Dottrel. 


Specimens agree with the above pale subspecies described by 
44* 


63 MR. P. D. MONTAGUE ON THE 


Mathews ; it is distinct from the eastern bird. It is distributed all 
along the coasts of Mid- and Western Australia and the Northern 
Territory. 

Observed throughout June, July, and August; being seen 
generally on the tidal flats at low water, but flying about in 
flocks when the tide is high along the outer shores. Specimens 
were shot on June 10th and July 4th. 

3: wing 102-105 mm.; culmen 13:5; tarsus 25. 


20. PISOBIA MINUTA RUFICOLLIs. 230. Little Stint. 

Trynga ruficollis, Pallas, Reise Russ. Reichs, vol. in. p. 700, 
1776; Siberia. 

The same remarks apply as to Hupoda geoffroyi and mongolus. 
Specimens obtained on July 10th. 

3: wing 109 mm.; culmen 17°5; tarsus 17°5. 

OF VON mame oes 16; iy ee LE 


91. DemreGRerrA sAcRA. Reef Heron. 


This species was observed commonly, and both white and grey 
forms were seen, though only the latter , which is by far the most 
plentiful, was obeuned: They were generally to be found about 
the rocks and cliffs of the outer aioe seldom frequenting the 
more sheltered inlets. A nest, containing three eggs, was dis- 
covered on a small flat islet to the north of Hermite. It formed a 
lining of loose sticks to a depression in the rock, a few feet above 
high-tide level. Only a yard or two away there was an Osprey’s 
nest with newly-hatched chicks; although this bird will not 
tolerate another nest of its own species upon the same island, it 
does not in the least resent the presence of that of a different 


bird. 
92. PELECANUS CONSPICILLATUS. New Holland Pelican. 


Observed in small parties, usually of a dozen or so, around the 
islands to the north of the group. ‘They do not breed in the 
vicinity. 


23. HaAuiairus LeucoGAsTER Cuv. White-bellied Sea-Hagle. 
G2, WE) 


This species, which enjoys a wide distribution, from the coasts 
of India, Ceylon, Malay Archipelago, and Australia to Western 
Polynesia and Tonga, occurs abundantly on the islands off North- 
Western Australia. Two pairs were nesting upon the Monte Bello 
Group, one at the extreme south-eastern end of Trimouille, and 
another on a small flat islet tothe north of Hermite. The former 
nest was placed upon a sloping ledge of a cliff, and a great 
quantity of material was employed to bring the outer edge to the 
level of the inner portion ; it was consequently a bulky structure, 
5 ft. 6 in. in diameter—composed of sticks and seaweed, with no 
obvious cavity or lining—forming a safe and level platform for 
the single chick. In the second instance, there was practically 


FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 639 


no nest, the single newly-hatched chick lying in a depression in 
the flat rock, into which had been placed a scanty collection of 
grass and sticks as a lining; here there was no danger of the egg 
or young bird falling out and being destroyed. 

The species seems to subsist entirely upon fish and sea-snakes, 
never molesting the sea-birds (at least the adults), though the pair 
upon Trimouille were subject to violent attacks from a pair of 
Ospreys which were nesting upon a neighbouring rock. Whenever 
they were in the air together, the Ospreys would circle above the 
Eagle, screaming loudly, and then suddenly swoop down upon it. 
The latter bird would usually turn sharply sideways or almost 
upon its back, holding out its formidable talons and thus warning 
off its assailants, a feat of balance and flight fascinating to watch, 


24. HALIASTUR GIRRENERA Vieill. 


This species occurs around the coasts of Northern and Eastern 
Australia, and New Guinea. The N.W. Cape and Monte Bello 
Islands are near the southern limit of its distribution on the 
west side of the continent. In the region of the Ashburton 
River it is not uncommon, and two pairs were observed upon the 
Monte Bello Islands, where they seem to subsist almost entirely 
upon small rock-crabs. On Trimouille one of these birds was 
observed to leave a heap of broken limbs and empty carapaces, 
which formed a pile more than a yard across upon a slab of rock in 
a large shallow cave to the east of the island. A nest contain- 
ing similar remains was discovered amongst the mangroves on 
Hermite. It was placed in the fork of a Bruguiera, and was 
deep in form, about equal in size to that of a crow and composed 
of sticks, seaweed and Spinifex, with no distinct lining. It con- 
tained a single egg, dirty white in ground-colour, with scanty and 
minute streaks and sparks of rusty brown. 


25. PANDION HALIAHTUS MELVILLENSIS. 373. Northern White- 
headed Osprey. (PI. IT.) 
Mathews, Austral Avian Record, vol.1. p. 34,1912; Melville I. 


This Western Australian form of the almost cosmopolitan species 
occurs very abundantly, particularly frequenting the archipelago of 
flat rocks and islets lying to the north of the group, upon neariy 
every one of which there was a nest. The majority had laid early in 
June, but fresh eggs were obtained late in July and early in August. 
The nest isa conspicuous and bulky structure, ranging from about 
11 inches to 5 feet in height, but always measuring about 3 ft. 6 in. 
in internal and about 5 feet in external diameter. It is composed 
of sticks, drift-wood, seaweed and bits of coral, etc., the shallow 
cavity being lined with finer seaweeds and any other soft 
material. Only one nest is ever found upon an island, though 
nests may be in close proximity if separated by water. When 
situated upon a low rock, the nest is usually four to five feet high 
and forms a conspicuous object. On the larger islands it is 


640 MR. P. D. MONTAGUE ON THE 


generally a smaller structure, placed in some elevated position 
such as the top of a steep hill or a cliff overlooking the sea. 

The eggs in nearly every case were three in number, one of 

which was often addled, creamy white in ground-colour, boldly 
blotched with deep reddish brown and underlying markings of 
purple-grey. Average measurements, 60x47 mm. The young 
when hatched are covered with grey down, and in their first 
plumage the head and breast are much streaked with brown. 
The food, judging from remains found in the nest, consists 
mostly of sea-snakes aud a sphyreenid fish, known locally as 
‘ Pike,’ which swims near the surface over the sandy shallows. In 
catching prey so slippery and narrow in girth, the conical and 
sharply pointed enlarged scales under the feet must be of especial 
service. As has often been observed in other localities, the prey 
is always carried lengthwise. 


REPTILIA, 


The following is a list of the Reptiles inhabiting the group. 
The nomenclature adopted is that of Boulenger, Brit. Mus. Cat. 
of Lizards, 1885, and Cat. of Snakes, 1893. I have to thank 
Mr. Boulenger for his kind assistance in identification. 


1, HEeTERoNOTA BINOEI Gray. (PI. I. figs. 1-3.) 
Gray, Cat. p. 159; Boulenger, B.M. Cat. vol. i. p. 151. 
This species is distributed over Western Australia and the 
islands off the coast. On the Monte Bello Group it is very 
abundant, and the individuals are of large size and extremely 
variable in colour. It is nocturnal in habit, hiding by day under 
stones or pieces of wood, but at night it may be seen in numbers 
with the aid of a lantern, moving about rather sluggishly over 


the sand in search of the small beetles and spiders upon which it 
feeds. 


2, GuHYRA vaRrEGATA, B.M. Cat. vol. i, p. 151. 

Perwpia variegata Gray, Cat. p. 159. 

This little gecko is widely distributed over Australia and 
Polynesia, though most of the records are from the north and 
west of the continent. On the Monte Bello Islands, it occurs 
quite commonly on the sandy plains which are well clothed with 
scrub, hiding by day in the sand, and ascending the bushes at 
night in search of insects. Nearly all the examples were obtained 
at night upon stumps and posts which had been ‘ sugared’ for 
moths, preying upon the insects as they alighted. 

The specimens obtained, which are all from Hermite, are of 
small size, and show in every case four longitudinal rows of light 
spots down the dorsal surface, which are absent from the majority 
of examples examined from other localities. It is remarkable 


FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 641 


that on Hermite this species and //. binoei bear a strong super- 
ficial resemblance to one another, both in size and coloration. 
The resemblance in size is perhaps the most remarkable, as the 
following figures will show :— 

H, binoet: length, B.M. Catalogue, 80 mm.; Hermite speci- 


mens, 103 mm. 

G. variegata: length, B.M. Catalogue, 147 mm.; Hermite 
specimens, 87 min. 

The discrepancy between the Monte Bello forms is largely 
accounted for by the long slender tail of H. binoei, the average 
measurements of the largest specimens from snout to base of 
tail being in the two cases, 7. binoei 58°4 mm. and G@. varregata 
54mm. Furthermore, it may be observed that the white spots on 
G. variegata correspond to some extent In position and appearance 
to the white tetrahedral scales on the back of H/. binoei. The 
fact is interesting, as the two species are found together on the 
same ground, though the one obtains its food on the sand and 
the other on the bushes above. 


3. PHYSIGNATHUS GILBERTI. (Pl. I. figs. 4-7.) 


B. M. Cat. vol. i. p. 396. 

Lophognathus gilberti Gray, Cat. p. 12. 

This large and handsome lizard was seen very abundantly on 
Hermite Island, and occurs on nearly all the other islands. On 
warm and sunny days it could be seen almost anywhere, running 
and jumping with great agility over the rocks and trees, feeding 
mostly upon a large and abundant grasshopper, Cyrtacanthacris 


guttulosa. 
The species is distributed over Northern and Western Aus- 


tralia. Montebello examples are greatly below the average size. 


4, ABLEPHARUS MUELLERI, B. M. Cat. vol. iii. p. 356. 

Phaneropis muellert Fisch., Arch. f. Nat. 1881, p. 236, pl. xii. 

This lizard is probably common, for the regular waved track, 
formed by its burrowing through the surface sand, was 
frequently seen in the early morning, an indication that the 
species 1s nocturnal in its movements. Owing to the great 
rapidity with which it burrows, it is hard to capture, and our 
examples were obtained by turning over loose rocks in large 
numbers. It had previously been recorded only from Western 
Australia. 


5. Lycosoma srpEs, B. M. Cat. vol. ii. p. 337. 

Rhodona bipes Fisch., Arch. f. Nat. 1882, p. 292, pl. xvii. 
‘figs. 10-15. 

Apparently resembles in habit the preceding species, and 
obtained from the same locality in the same manner. It is 
apparently confined to N.W. Australia. 


642 MR. P. D. MONTAGUE ON THE 


6. Lygosoma LEsuEURII, B. M. Cat. vol. iil. p. 225. 


Hinula australis Gray, Cat. p. 77. 

Tiliqua australis Gray, Ann. Nat. Hist. ii. 1838, p. 291. 

This species is fairly abundant on all the larger islands, 
frequenting generally the limestone slopes of the hills, and during 
the heat of the day running about with great activity. Distributed 
over Western Australia. 


7. Lygosoma 1soLepts, B. M. Cat. vol. iii. p. 234, pl. xv. fig. 1. 

Hinula tenuis Gray, Cat. p. 76. 

Rather common on the Spinifex-plains of Hermite. Diurnal, 
feeding upon flies and the smaller Orthoptera. Distributed over 
Western Australia. 


8. VaRANus GouLpit, B. M. Cat. vol. 1. p. 320. 

Monitor gouldi Gray, Cat. p. 12. 

This large species, which occurs over Northern and Western 
Australia and New Guinea, is abundant over the whole Monte Bello 
Group, wherever there are flat sandy plains of sufficient extent. 
In places the ground is riddled with its fattened burrows, which 
usually descend to a depth of two feet or so, and ascend again to 
a second entrance, though they often branch and intersect. The 
reptile is only in evidence on very hot days, and is generally 
shy and wary, running with great rapidity. It feeds upon the 
larger Orthoptera, possibly also upon small birds. On _ the 
mainland in this vicinity it is known by the name of ‘ Bung- 
arra,’ derived from the aborigines, amongst whom it forms a 
source of food. It is supposed to do considerable damage to 
young chickens and eggs in settled localities. 


9. VARANUS ACANTHURUS, B. M. Cat. vol. ii. p. 324. 

Odatria ocellata Gray, Cat. p. 8. 

This reptile is apparently scarce, for only one specimen was 
seen, being obtained on a Spinifex-plain of Hermite. On the 
mainland it is found over the north and west of the continent. 


10. TyPHLops AMMoDyTES, sp. n. (PI. I. figs. 8-10.) 


Snout rounded and strongly projecting; nostril lateral. Rostral 
narrow, the upper portion nearly one-third the width of the head, 
not extending quite to the level of the eyes. Nostril between two 
nasals, the inferior of which comes just in contact with the lower 
portion of the preocular. Upper nasal nearly as broad as the 
rostral. Frontal small, prefrontal and parietals larger than 
the scales of the body. Eyes distinct. Four upper labials. 
20 scales around the middle of the body. Tail slightly longer 
than broad, conical, ending in a short spine. Colour a uniform 
pale greyish brown, somewhat lighter on the under surface. 

Length 230mm. Diameter of body, 4mm. 

Found in the sand, under a loose rock, Hermite Island. 


FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 643 


This species holds quite an isolated position. In most respects 
it approaches 7’. braminis, from which it is readily distinguished 
by the inferior nasal not extending to the upper surface of the 
head. 


11. Lrasis CHILDRENI Gray. 


Gray, Zool. Miscell. 1842, p. 44; Cat. p. 93; Dum. & 
Bibr. Erp. Gén. vi. p. 439, 1844. 

Only one specimen of this snake was seen and obtained. 
Apparently it is not common, though probably more in evidence 
in the very hot weather. It is distributed over Northern Australia 
to the islands in Torres Straits. J am aware of no previous 
record so far south as the Monte Bello Group. 


From the above list, it will be seen that the reptilian fauna is 
typically North-West Australian, and it is quite possible that 
the new Z'yphlops will be found also to occur on Barrow Island 
and the mainland. With one or two exceptions, however, the 
island forms have undergone a marked reduction in size. 

The following measurements of total lengths illustrate to what 
extent this reduction has taken place :— 


Brit. Mus. Cat. Largest specimen obtained. 
LENO UN OCU ence anes, 80 mm. 103 mm. 
G. variegata ...... 147 ,, Sime 
Jee OIWERGS. doenbande ANGIS) |p BOO)» oe 
A. muelleri......... She AEs 
Ib, WYVES hoonoocoede Bi. op 82h, 
Ibe OSHA DIS saoone oon OSS WAY 
Vis gould ttre 3. LOO LOMO 
V. acanthurus .. 665 ,, OO 
* INSECTA. 


The collections of insects from the Monte Bello Islands are 
small. The islands were worked only during the dry months, 
when probably not one-third of the species were in the imago 
state, and it is probable that after the tropical rains very 
different results might have been obtained. On the other hand, 
the rainfall is so erratic that there are really no fixed seasons for 
emergence, and, the average temperature being high, a shower of 
rain in July may cause the emergence in small numbers of a 
species occurring abundantly after a heavy storm in October. 
To this cause I attribute the large percentage of odd examples, 
for showers occurred in April and in July, after a prolonged 
period of drought—the tropical rains of the previous season having 
failed. It is interesting to note, that with the common Pierid 
butterfly, Belenois teutonia, though the majority were of the 
dry-season form with the black on the margins of the wings 
reduced, about 20 per cent. were intermediate, and a few examples 
even approached the wet-season form. The collection, therefore, 


644 MR. P. D. MONTAGUE ON THE 


may be more representative than might at first be supposed. In 
any case the number of species inhabiting the islands is likely to 


be small. 


LEPIDOPTERA. 
Rhopalocera. 


Of butterflies frequenting the Monte Bello Islands there are 
eight species, the majority of which are common and _ widely 
distributed forms, though one, possibly two, of the Lycnids are 
distinct island forms. ‘lhe specimens have been compared with 
forms in the British Museum. 


1. BeLenors TevronrA Fabr. 

Belenois java Waterhouse, Cat. Rhop. of Australia, no, 1 
memoir, N.S.W. Naturalists’ Club, 1903. 

A well-known Austro- Malayan species, very abundant. 


2. PRECIS VELLIDA (Fabr.). 
One example of this widely-distributed and rather variable 
butterfly. 


3. VANESSA KERSHAWI McCoy. 

Another wideily-distributed form, the Australian representative 
of the familiar V. cardui. In the Monte Bello examples, the 
fifth (anterior) spot on the under surface of the hind wing is much 
reduced or absent. Though in this respect the Monte Bello series 
is uniform, yet these spots are generally somewhat variable, and 
no systematic distinction can be made. 


4. Danats curysippus Linn., form petilia (Stoll). 
An Austro-Malayan form, not uncommon on Hermite. 


5. NEoLuciA sERPENTATA H.-Sch. 

The Monte Bello series is again very uniform, and differ from 
most examples in having only one ocellus at the hind margin of 
the lower surface of the hind wing. The general coloration 
of the lower surface is brighter than in specimens from East and 
South Australia, and less bright and distinct than in specimens 
from Port Darwin and the tropical North. It is identical with 
specimens from Wallaby Island in the British Museum collection, 
and is possibly an island form. Very common over the whole 
group. 


6. NAcADUBA BIOCELLATA Felder. 

This butterfly extends over Western Australia, being parti- 
cularly abundant on the islands off the north-west coast. ‘The sets 
obtained on Hermite, Long and Trimouille Islands are identical 
with examples from Queen’s Islet, N.W.A. The species was very 
abundant from June to the end of July, frequenting the flowers 
of Myoporum. 


FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 645 


7. HoLocHILA HEATHII AERATA, subsp. n. 


This is a common Monte Bello form of H. heathii Cox. It is 
somewhat smaller, and the male shows a bronze rather than 
a purple sheen upon the upper surface of the wings, and is 
of generally darker coloration. In the female, the blue on the 
upper surface of the fore wings is much reduced, in some examples 
being confined to the base of “the interspace between the first and 
second veins. Both sexes have six very distinct marginal spots 
upon the lower surface of the fore and hind wings, in this 
respect resembling the type and differing from examples from 
the south-west and central parts of Western Australia, in which 
these spots are generally indistinct and sometimes absent. 


8. OXYTOXIA ARGENTEO-ORNATUS Hew. 


A large series, mostly from Hermite. 


Heterocera. 


It is by no means sure that the majority of species in the 
following list are not accidental visitors to the islands. By far 
the greater number of the Noctuze were taken upon sugar on 
one or two evenings, notably June 20th and from June the 29th 
to the first few days of July, 1912. Though sugar was applied 
almost every evening throughout our three months’ visit, yet it 
was only upon these few occasions that moths were taken. The 
nights in question were warm and still, following upon periods of 
strong easterly and south-easterly winds, which had blown for 
several daysin succession. It would not be surprising that winds 
of this nature, which several times enveloped the islandsin clouds 
of dust from the deserts of the mainland, should bring with them 
winged insects capable of fairly prolonged flight. There are, 
however, several forms which are apparently new, two of which 
are described here. Other apparently new species require 
comparison with type-specimens in Australia. As the N.W. 
Australian fauna is at present but little known, it would be 
unsafe to base any zoo-geographical conclusions upon insects so 
easily transported. 


1. AMSACTA MARGINATA Donov. 


Three examples, similar to specimens in the British Museum 
from the Sherlock River district, including a yellow-bodied 
aberration, which is also identical in every respect. In the red- 
bodied specimens, the black spots on the margins of the hind 
wings are much reduced, whereas in the yellow-bodied specimen 
they are very prominent. 


2. UYETHEISA PULCHELLOIDES Hainps. 


Identical with specimens from Port Darwin and Baudin 
Island. 


646 MR. P. D. MONTAGUE ON THE 


3. Evproctris curoniris Turner. 
A very abundant species distributed over most of Australia 


4, AnTHELA Walk. (Darala W alk.) PUDICA Swinh. 
A somewhat dark form of this West Australian species. 


5. CoLtusa sp. ? near C. flavala. 


6. EUxoA RADIANS. 
Distributed all over Australia. 


7. CHLORIDEA ARMIGERA Hiibn. 
Agrees with specimens from North Australia, in which the 
orbital stigma is nearly obsolete. 


8. NEOCLEPTRIA PUNCTIFERA Walk. 
Distributed over Northern and Western Australia. 


9. MELICLEPTRIA NEURIAS Meyr. 

Agrees with the light West Australian form from the Sherlock 
River. 

10. MELICLEPTRIA ALBIVENATA, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 11.) 


Head and thorax light brown ; abdomen white below, yellowish 
above. Fore wings yellowish brown, the veins white, narrowly 
bordered on each side with dark brown. In some specimens, the 
wing more or less diffused with scattered white scales, with the 
exception of the diseoidal cell, which stands out rather clearly, 
and the region near the outer margin. A terminal series of dark 
points, but often indistinct. Hind wings white, suffused with 
brown except upon the terminal and costal areas. Expanse, 
27 mm. 

In general appearance resembles J/. canusina Swinh. (Hamps., 
B.M, Cat, vol, iv. p. 99) from the Sherlock River district, but 
distinguished by the white nervures and suffusion. 

Taken on sugar, Hermite, July 1912. 


11. Proparria MUNDOoIDES Lower. 
Widely distributed upon the mainland of Australia. 


12. EcropaTRIA ASPERA Walk. 

Distributed over Australia and New Zealand. 
13. PANDESMA SUBMURINA Walk. 

Australia and New Guinea. 


14. Grammopus ocELLATA Tepper. 
Two typical examples. Distributed over Australia. 


15. GoNITIS SUBULIFERA Guen. 
A few examples of this almost cosmopolitan species. 


FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS, 647 


16. ANUMETA ZUBOIDES, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 12.) 


This may prove to be merely a form of Anwmeta zuba Swinh., 
to which in any case it is very closely allied. Compared with 
specimens in the British Museum, the following distinctions are 
readily observed : somewhat larger in size; the white line across 
the fore wings in the majority of specimens much more distinct, 
waved instead of straight ; hind wings darker in colour. Expanse, 
50 mm. 

The specimens were taken on sugar, Hermite, July 1912. 


17. CIRPHIS ABDOMINALIS Walk. 
Recorded from North Australia. Hermite, scarce. 


18. Amywna ocro Guen. 
Widely distributed, occurring from India to the New Hebrides. 


19. Amyna sprtonota Lower. 
A North Australian species, recorded from Port Darwin. 


20. EUBLEMMA DUBIA Butler. 
Distributed over the greater part of the Australian continent. 


21. PotypEsMA LAwsont Feld. 


Western Australia. Specimens identical with examples from 
the Sherlock River. 


PoOLYDESMA MARMARINOPA. 
Also identical with specimens from the Sherlock River. 


COLEOPTERA. 


The following very meagre provisional list comprises all the 
beetles found upon the islands, although considerable pains were 
taken in their collection. Searching the sand and vegetation at 
night by the aid of a lantern yielded the best results, but there 
ean be few species and those by no means abundant. Of these 
three appear to be new, but they are not now described, as many 
type-specimens of West Australian species have not been examined. 
The list will serve at least to show the type of the fauna. 


Trox crotchi Har.. Hermite. 

. Isodon novitius Blackb. Hermite. 

. Coccinella transversalis Fabry. Hermite. 
Dermestes cadavorinus Faby. From a dead Cat. 
. Gonocephalum meyricki Blackb. Hermite. 
. Sympetes, (2?) sp. n. Hermite. 

. Saragus, (?) sp.n. Hermite. 

. Mictotragus arachne Pascoe. All islands. 

. Phorocantha, (2) senio Newm. Hermite. 
Symphyletes, (2) sp.n. Hermite. 
Bostrychopsis jesuitus Fabr. All islands. 


ow oo bo Ee 


is 
HOw naASD 


648 MR. P. D. MONTAGUE ON THE 


ORTHOPTERA. 


The Orthoptera, as is usually the case in warm and arid 
localities, comprise a large and characteristic section of the insect 
fauna of the Monte Bello Islands. There are few species, but of 
those that do occur, some are extremely abundant. The larger 
winged species are mostly of wide distribution, but the smaller 
wingless forms comprise several undescribed (¢) species. 

The aeridiids include such forms as the large Cyrtacanthus 
guttulosa, which occurs in great numbers upon all the islands, 
forming the main food-supply of the larger Reptiles. This insect 
is capable of prolonged flight, though it is only upon rare occasious 
that it exerts this faculty, and then can be observed flying in 
swarms through the Spinifex, usually about sunset. The ‘ Blue- 
winged Locust,’ Coryphistes cyanopterus Charpentier, also occurred 
but the examples were mostly of small size. The species is of 
wide distribution. Another large form, Acridiwm maculicollis, 
was also recorded, though it was not common. 

Of the mantids, only two were met with in numbers, 
Archimantis brunneriana Sauss., a North Australian species, and 
a smaller species of the genus Orthoderides, near O. ministralis 
Fabr., but as yet undetermined. This insect was always found 
upon the foliage of Wyoporum acuminatum, the leaves of which it 
closely assimilates both in form and colour. 

Three species of cockroach were obtained, two of them identical 
with, or closely allied to, Periplaneta concolor Walk. and 
Ellipsidron inquinata Walk., and the third apparently a new 
species of the genus Polyzosteria. One female phasmid was 
also obtained, clearly a form of or closely allied to Wyrtacus 
entrachelia (Westwood). 


HYMENOPTERA. 


The species of Hymenoptera from N.W. Australia are little 
known. Consequently any geographical conclusions based on 
collections from Monte Bello are likely to be erroneous. The 
following is a provisional list showing the type of the fauna, but 
the ants have been omitted. 


1. PARACOLLETES PERFASCIATUS Cock. 


This species has been identified by Mr. G. Meade-Waldo, British 
Museum, who contributes the following note. 

“The type of this species, described by Cockerell (Ann. Mag. 
Nat. Hist. (7) xvii. p. 25, 1906) from a specimen in very pocr 
condition, has ‘Western Australia’ as its only locality. It may be 
useful to give a few remarks on the pubescence, which is 
much spoiled by wetting in the type. For structure, Cockerell’s 
description is excellent. The thorax in fine fresh specimens is 
densely clothed with brownish-buff pubescence, thickly inter- 


FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 649 


mingled with black hairs; the median segment is clothed with 
whitish pubescence on the surface of the truncation, and the scopa 
on the posterior tibie and tarsi is composed of long and dense white 
hairs. Two females collected on Hermite Island, July 1912.” 


2. NoMIA FLAVIVIRIDIS, subsp. doddi, Cock. 


Also identified by Mr. Meade-Waldo. Another W. Australian 
species. 
. Epactrothynnus productus Turner. Hermite. 
. Thynnus, (?) sp. n. Hermite. 
. Bembex, (2) variabilis Sm. Hermite. 
. Sphex australis Sauss. Hermite. 
. Trachysphex, (2) pilosulus Turner. 
. Saluis tuberculatus Sm. Hermite. 
. Aporus cingulatus Fabr. 
. Aporus, (?) sp. n. Hermite. 
11. Ephutomorpha morosa Westw. Hermite. 
12. Ephutomorpha modesta Smith. Hermite, Trimouille. 
13. Henicospilus sp. ? 


Oo MIS Oe Co 


= 


Of other insects the Hemiptera were not well represented, the 
majority of forms being Homoptera. Two species of water-bugs 
were obtained from the Home Lagoon, Hermite, one closely 
resembling Hermatobatodes marche: Coutiére et Martin (Bull, 
Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris, vii. 1907, p. 214) and the other Halobates 
wulterstorfii (Frauenf.)* ; both appear to have points of specific 
difference. 


MYRIAPODA. 


Identified by Professor K. Kraepelin. 

The species are all forms found upon the West Australian 
mainland, though one is apparently an insular variety. The 
specimens were largely collected from under stones during the 
daytime, but some were found running about in the sand by the 
aid of a lantern at night. 


1. RHOMBOCEPHALUS L&TUS Haase. 

Scolopendra leta Haase, Abh. Mus. Dresden, No. 5, p. 51, 
pl. iii. fig. 51 (1887). 

Recorded from Western Australia and New South Wales. 
Fairly numerous on Hermite. 


2. RHoMBOCEPHALUS MoRSITANS (Linn.). 


(Scolopendra morsitans Linn.) 


Probably imported from Asia by way of the mainland, where 
it is now established. ‘The species is now almost universally 
distributed in the warmer parts of the world. 


* Ofr. F. B. White, ‘ Challenger’ Report, p. 40, 


650 MR. P. D. MONTAGUE ON THE 


3. CoRMOCEPHALUS TURNERI Pocock. 


Pocock, Annals & Mag. Nat. Hist., 7th Series, vol. viii. p. 456 
(1901). 

Three examples, taken on Hermite, differ from the type from 
Perth, Western Australia, in that the last tergum has a distinct 
median groove, which is lacking in the mainland form. 


4, ASANADOPSIS MJOBERGI Kraepelin. 


At the time of writing, Professor Kraepelin’s description of this 
species, which was sent to him by Dr. Mjéberg from North- 
Western Australia, was not yet published. Professor Kraepelin 
considers this second example from Hermite to be identical, 
though he could not be absolutely certain, for he had sent back 
the type and was consequently unable to compare the two. 


One species of scorpion was obtained on Hermite. It is 
identified by Dr. Kraepelin as Lychas variatus Thor. 


PISCES. 


The following fishes are inhabitants of the tidal lagoons. They 
nave been identified by Mr. C. Tate Regan. 


1. Orectolobus tentaculatus Peters. 
Rhinobatus armatus Gray. 

. Murena thyrsoidea Richards. 
Plotosus anguillaris Bloch. 
Cheroichthys valenciennei Kaup. 
Pseudochromis fuscus Miller & Trosch. 
Valenciennea longipinnis Benn. 

. Gobius phalena Cuy. & Val. 

. Opsanus diemensis Lesueur. 


oe wt 


Io 


woe 2) 


SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS. 


In considering the relation between these islands and the main- 
land, a feature of primary importance is the extreme shallowness 
of the sea between them and the mainland, in all probability 
indicating a separation of comparatively recent date. The 
invertebrate fauna of Barrow Island is unfortunately little known. 
The identity of the Wallaby, Lagorchestes conspicillatus, and the 
Bandicoot, /soodon barrowensis, support the theory that Barrow 
and the Monte Bello Group were continuous long after their 
separation from the mainland. 

The fauna, however, is not typical Vorth-West Australian, such 
as is met with in the Ashburton district, but comprises many 
Northern and South-Western forms. There are, furthermore, few 
species, and these are of mixed distribution. Many characteristic 
North-Western forms are entirely absent, though a high per- 
centage of those species not. easily transported (such as the 
Reptiles and Chilopoda) are identical with, or slightly modified 
representatives of, the species occurring in the immediate vicinity 
upon the mainland. Mr. Hogg, in dealing with the spiders, has 


FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 651 


pointed out the absence from the collections of several species so 
widely spread as to be generally found in any locality in Australia. 
He suggests, therefore, that the islands have once been largely 
denuded of the original spider fauna, and were repopulated 
subsequently with other species. These seem mostly to have come 
from the south-west by the trade-wind course, for the majority 
could certainly have been wind-borne. ‘These remarks in some 
measure seem to apply to other groups of animals, though many 
species are northern, occurring in Queensland and the Northern 
Territory, probably having come down by the hurricane course. 

That an almost complete depopulation of the islands could have 
occurred is by no means an improbability, when their small size 
and the prevailing meteorological conditions are considered. It 
will be noted that the vast majority of the specimens recorded are 
from Hermite. ‘This island was certainly the most thoroughly 
worked, though the others were frequently visited, but its fauna 
was at least three times as large as that of any of the smaller 
islands. This is merely a demonstration of the obvious fact that 
the smaller the island, the less will be the chance of a sufficient 
number of individuals surviving to perpetuate the species after a 
particularly severe and prolonged period of drought. It is indeed 
remarkable that the Wallaby has been able to survive, considering 
that it lives entirely in the open, and has nowhere to shelter 
except amongst the Spinifex during the hurricanes, when trees 
and bushes are torn up by their roots, and sand and shells blown 
about with such violence as to cut deeply into wood. 

In considering this point, it 1s well to remember that little work 
has been done in the North-West of Australia, and the distribution 
of some species may be found to be much more extended than is 
at present supposed. Moreover, other forms, which might be 
looked upon as island species, may really be quite common on the 
mainland, though as yet unrecorded. However, the well-known 
generalisations with regard to island faunas ( using the word 

‘island’ in the zoological sense) hold good:—the wingless forms 
not easily transported comprise most of the undescribed forms, 
being In many instances clearly the modified representatives of 
mainland species, whereas the easily transported winged species 
are for the most part of wide distribution. There are many 
anomalies, which can only be explained by considering individually 
the habits of each species and the prevailing meteorological 
conditions. Amongst the Longicorn beetles, for example, there 
are two abundant species, of which one, Mictotragus arachne, has 
the elytra completely fused, and is absolutely identical with the 
form occurring abundantly upon the mainland opposite. The 
other, Symphyletes, sp.n.(?), a form with well-developed wings, is 
confined to Hermite. A possible factor in such local distributions 
is perhaps to be looked for in the whirlwinds which area character- 
istic weather-feature of the district. These disturbances can be 
observed almost any day, and must certainly be regarded as an 
important distributing factor. Of the two beetles in question, the 


Proc, Zoou, Soc.—1914, No, XLY, 49 


652 ON THE FAUNA OF THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 


Mictotragus is almost invariably found walking about freely upon 
the surface of the sand, and has an extremely thick and hard 
cuticle, being therefore well adapted for wind transportation. 
The Symphyletes, on the other hand, was only found upon its 
particular plant, Zricholesma zeylanicum R. Br., clinging to the 
stems just below the clusters of flowers and buds, from which it 
was not easily dislodged. 

Of the birds, one new subspecies, Hremiornis cartert assimilis, 
is a bird of very weak flight, seldom fluttering more than a few 
yards at a stretch, and taking shelter in the densest thickets. It 
is therefore not surprising that it should differ from its mainland 
representative. In the subspecies of Anthus australis, however, 
the case is different, for it is a bird of powerful flight, often 
observed crossing the passages between islands, and inhabiting the 
open plains. It is suprising that this bird should exhibit even 
more marked differences from the mainland form than the last- 
named, 


EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. 


Prats I. 
Heteronota hinoei. 


Figs. 1, 


. Showing variation in markings. 
Individual with regenerating tail. 


ws) 


Physignathus gilberti. 


. Male, nat. size. 

. Under surface of head, showing general outline and gular fold, 
. Female, nat. size. 

. Under surface of head of female. 


TAA 


Typhlops ammodytes, sp. n. 
8. Head, dorsal view. 
9. Head, ventral view. 
0. Tail, ventral view. 
11. Melicleptria albivenata, sp. n., nat. size. 


12. Anumeta zuboides, sp. n. 


Prate II. 


Young Pandion haliaétus melvillensis in nest. 


Prare III. 


Nest and young of Haliaétus leucogaster. 


Prate LV. 


Home Lagoon and Vegetation of Hermite Island. 


PZ.S.1914.RATHBUN.PLI, 


Huth, London. 
CRUSTACEA FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 


PZ.8.1914.RATHBUN PLU 


Huth,London, 
CRUSTACEA FROM THE MONTE BEL nO- tS Anieee 


ON CRUSTACEA FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 653 


36. Stalk-eyed Crustaceans collected at the Monte Bello 
Islands. By Mary J. Ratrusun, United States 
National Museum, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.* 


[ Received March 18, 1914: Read June 9, 1914.] 
(Plates I., II.+) 


InpDEx. 

Systematic : Page 
Periclimenes hermitewsis, Sp. We... ...ceceeecsevseeenserreveee 650 
fiaitknarates WES Dery INOVNS Ts“ pocenseencca casos bnonoaesaeeqesnces HSK / 
AIGTED: GUS ARLy FD Ws oop coscovsvcncondeneccassceanoecseonnc oats) 
Glyptowanthus cymbifer, SP. MN. ... ccc see eee seeseeseesrsensese 858 


This little collection, numbering only 28 species, contains three 
new species and variations of several old ones. Incidentally a 
hew name is given to one of the numerous forms of Zhalamita 
related to 7. admete, which in time ean perhaps be lined up as 
subspecies or varieties of that species. ‘The most notable of the 
new species is the Glyptoxanthus, a genus new to the Indo-Pacific 
region. 

A remarkable discovery is the fact that at least one of the 
marine crabs, Vasxioides serpulifera, undergoes transformation to 
the adult form while it is still within the breod-pouch of the 
mother. Furthermore, it there passes through two adult stages, 
but whether the first is hatched directly from the egg or not, it 
is impossible to tell. It has long been known that the fresh- 
water crabs (Potamonide) develop into the adult form before 
leaving the mother, and in some cases at least pass through a 
megalops stage. Careful researches into the metamorphoses of 
marine crabs would doubtless disclose other cases similar to that 
here recorded. 


Order DECAPODA. 
Family PENEID A. 


METAPENEUS MoNOCEROS (Fabricius) £. 

Metapeneus monoceros Alcock, Catal. Ind. Dee. Crust. Ind. 
Mus., Part iii. Fasc. i. 1906, p. 18, pl. iii. figs. 7—7e. 

Dredged off Hermite; 2 fathoms; July 7, 1912; No. 110: 
1 S juv., about 47 mm. long. 


METAPENEUS STRIDULANS Alcock 2 


Metapeneus stridulans Aleock, Catal. Ind. Dec. Crust. Ind. 
‘Mus., Part: iii. Fase. i. 1906, p. 27, pl. v. figs. 14, 14 a-d, and 
synonymy. 


* Communicated by Prof. J. Srannny Garprner, M.A., F.R.S., F.Z.S. 

+ For explanation of the Plates see p. 664. 

{ [The parentheses around the names of authors placed after scientific names in 
this paper are used in accordance with Article 23 of the International Rules of 
Nomenclature (Proc. 7th Int. Cong. Boston, 1907, p. 44 Gore) pat Dinos 

45 


654 MISS M. J. RATHBUN ON CRUSTACEA 


Monte Bello Islands ; special locality not given: 19. 

In the main, this specimen agrees with Alcock’s description 
and figures. There are 17 ridges in the stridulating organ near 

he posterior corners of the carapace. The telson and the 
helyeum differ from typical stridulans. The telson has 5 (not 4) 
pairs of marginal spines, 4 pairs of which are movable, and the 
posterior pair immovable. The thelycum has the plate between 
the legs of the fifth pair similar to that in fig. 14d, loc. eit.; the 
plate between the legs of the fourth pair is trilobate or in the 
shape of a clover-leaf; the bar between those two plates is longer 
(from front to back) and narrower than the same plate in 
Alcock’s figure. 

On p..50 of his Catalogue (op. cit.), Dr. Alcock suggests the 
identity of my akayebi with stridulans. M. akayebi, however, is 
quite distinct ; the body and rostrum are more slender, the teeth 
on the latter more prominent; the antennal, hepatic and branchi- 
ostegal spines are larger; the second and third segments of the 
antennular peduncle are longer and more slender; subterminal 
prominence on carina of fifth abdominal segment obtusangular, 
not dentiform; sixth segment longer and narrower than in 
stridulans. The thelyecum is similar to that of the female from 
the Monte Bello Islands. 


Family CRANGONID& (=Alpheide), 


CRANGON EDWARDsII (Audouin). 


Alpheus edwardsii de Man, Jour. Linn. Soe. London, Zool., 
vol. xxii. 1888, p. 266, and synonymy. 

Home Lagoon, Hermite; Aug. 12, 1912; No. 140: 1 9 ovig., 
51 mm. long. 

Monte Bello Islands; special locality not given ; 2 specimens; 
the larger one lacks both pairs of chelipeds, the smaller one lacks 
the larger cheliped of the first pair. 


The two specimens possessing chelipeds of the second pair 
belong to the variety in which the first and second joints of the 
carpus are of the same length. The larger of these specimens 
shows a faint notch in the upper margin of the smaller manus of 
the first pair. 


CRANGON BUCEPHALUS (Coutiere), var. 


Alpheus bucephalus Coutiere, Alpheide in Gardiner’s Mald. & 
Laccad. Archip., 1905, p. 890, pl. Ixxviii. figs. 29-297; De Man, 
Alpheide ‘ Siboga,’ 1911, p. 316. 

Dredged off Hermite; sandy bottom; July 9-12, 1912; No. 
109: 13, about 12°5 mm. long. 

The differences between our specimen and the type are so few 
that the former probably represents no more than a variety of 
the latter. The specimen in hand is considerably larger than the 


FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 655 


type; it has not so longa rostral tooth, and consequently the 
sinuses between that tooth and the orbital prominences are not 
so deep; the antennal peduncle is not so long as in Coutiére’s 
fig. 29, although it is a little longer than the antennular peduncle ; 
the merus of the larger cheliped has a tooth at the lower distal 
angle, not unlike the tooth shown in Coutiére’s fig. 29 a’, but he 
says (p. 821) “le méropodite est inerme,” and in the figure, the 
tooth is applied against the carpus so that it is inconspicuous. 


Family PALHMONIDS®. 


Subfamily Pontoniine. 


PERICLIMENES HERMITENSIS, sp. n. (PI. I. figs. 1-3.) 


Hermite; under rock; Aug. 17, 1912; No. 159, 1 2 ovig. 

Dimensions. Type @, length from: tip of rostrum to tip of 
telson, approx., 39 mm.; length of carapace, 14 mm. 

A Perielimenes with thorax strongly arched from front to back 
as well as from side to side. Rostrum reaching to middle of 
third segment of antennular peduncle, compressed, thin; upper 
margin convex, armed with six teeth, the posterior of which is 
slightly behind the orbit ; tip acute ; lower limb shallower than 
upper, margin slightly convex, unidentate. An antennal and an 
hepatic spine present; no supraorbital spine. Branchiostegal 
angle of carapace rounded. Eyes small. Seale of antennulee 
narrow-ovate, reaching nearly to end of second segment, basal 
spine curved, acuminate. Peduncle of antenne reaches just to 
end of first segment of antennul, basal spine small; scale ovate- 
oblong, most produced at inner angle, its outer spine small, scale 
reaching beyond the peduncle of the antennule but not so far as 
their flagella; the flagellum of the antenne when bent back 
reaches half the length of the abdomen. 

The added lengths of the last two articles of the third maxilliped 
exceed that of the antepenultimate article. The chelipeds of the 
first pair when extended reach beyond the acicle by the length of 
their chelze ; merusand carpus subequal, manus 13 times as long as 
fingers and 2 as long as carpus. Chelipeds of second pair sub- 
equal, reaching beyond the acicle by the length of the chele ; 
merus cylindrical, unarmed; carpus cup-form, a large V-shaped 
notch in the lower, outer portion of the distal margin; manus 
subcylindrical, gradually widening a little distally ; fingers nearly 
as long as palm, prehensile edges entire and meeting or over- 
lapping when closed except at the base, where there is a very low 
tooth on the fixed finger between two similar ones on the dactylus ; 
tips spiniform, turned sharply toward each other. 

The dactyli of the third, fourth and fifth feet are short 
(about 1 as long as the propodi), curved ; lower margin convex at 
the base, but without spines or other protuberance. 

The first three segments of the abdomen are very broad ; sixth 
segment not much longer than wide and 2 as long as the telson ; 


656 MISS M. J. RATHBUN ON CRUSTACEA 


the latter is triangulate, with nearly straight sides, and an ob- 
tuse angled tip armed with three pairs of spinules, of which the 
intermediate pair is longest and the outer pair shortest. Uropods 
broad-oval, longer than the telson, the outer pair broader and a 
very little longer than the inner pair. 

Colour. 'The specimen, which is preserved in formalin and gly- 
cerine, is handsomely marked with lines of crimson and purple 3 
on the pleura of the first three abdominal segments there are four 
incomplete oval areas partly outlined with narrow crimson stripes ; 
the same colour forms aring on the end of each uropod, the inner 
ring smaller than the outer; the tip of the telson is also outlined 
in the same colour; within these five areas of the tail-fan, the 
colour is a lighter yellowish-red, Dorsal face of carapace a brown- 
ish-orange. Chelipeds of second pair with a narrow stripe of 
purple at the distal end of the merus, carpus and manus, and « 
more crimson stripe on the distal half of the fingers. The third, 
fourth, and fifth feet have similar purple stripes on the three 
principal segments. 

This species is not very nearly related to any other. It has 
the same rostral formula, . as P. parvus Borradaile (see Willey, 


Zool. Results, Part iv. 1900, p. 407, pl. xxxvi. figs. 3-3), but 
that species is more slender, with lower rostrum and larger eyes. 


ANCHISTUS INERMIS (Miers). 
See Borradaile, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (7) vol. ii, 1898, p. 387. 


Hermite, in mantle-cavity of Pinna; July 7, 1912; No. 112: 
19 ovig., about 26 mm. long. 

This corresponds in the main with the description and figures 
given by Miers (Crust. ‘ Alert,’ 1884, p. 291, pl. xxxii. figs. B, b, 
b'). In the Hermite specimen, the telson has at the end four 
sete, the outer pair stouter than the slender inner pair but nearly 
as long; Miers’s fig. b shows five setze, one median and two lateral 
pairs, the outer pair about half as long as the inner. The smaller 
cheliped of the second pair in our specimen has the tooth on the 
dactylus feebly developed, and fitting into a cavity in the fixed 
finger; in Miers’s'type this tooth was not developed, but the 
specimen was smaller. 

Miers described the species from Port Molle, Queensland ; he 
also had a specimen taken from a Pinna at Sharks Bay, West 
Australia. 


Family PagURID 4. 


DarpANus MEGISTOS (Herbst). 


Pagurus punctulatus Aleock, Catal. Ind. Dec. Crust. Ind. Mus., 
Part il. Fase. i. 1905, p. 81, pl. viii. fig. 1. 

One specimen, of medium size. he species is distributed 
throughout the Indo-Pacitfie region. 


‘FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS, “657 


Family PorRTUNIDA. 


THALAMITA DISPAR, hom. n. (PI. I. fig. 4.) 


Thalamita savignyt de Man (not A. Milne-Edwards), Zool. 
Jahrb., Syst., vol. viii. 1895, p. 564. 

Monte Bello Islands; 3¢. 

Dimensions. Type and largest 3: length of carapace 15:2 mm.; 
width 25°4 mm. 

This is the same species as that described by de Man (oe. cit.), 
for I have at hand for comparison one of his specimens from 
Palos Bay, West Celebes ; but it cannot be the true savignyi of 
A. Milne-Edwards (Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris, vol. x. 1861, 
p- 357), because in the figure of this in Savigny’s ‘Egypte’ (Crust. 
pl. iv. fig. 4) the inside of the hand shows coarse granules. 

Carapace pubescent except on the elevated ridges. These are 
prominent; the posterior one across the cardiac region with a 
smal] piece on the branchial region, though bare and elevated, 
lacks the distinct granulated edge which characterizes the other 
ridges. Lobes of front separated by an open median slit. Fourth 
tooth of lateral margins absent. Five crests on upper and outer 
surface of palm, the two uppermost crests each with three spines, 
of which the terminal one is short and subacute; third crest 
tuberculate, fourth and fifth obscurely granulate, the fifth very 
finely so; the first three interspaces each with some coarse 
granules and also pubescent ; in the smallest of the three speci- 
mens, the third interspace is smooth; there may be a line of 
pubescence above the lowest crest but it is not constant. 

The above characters suffice to differentiate this from other 
members of the admete group. 

The Celebes specimen is an adult female smaller than any of the 
males. It differs from them in having a very shallow and small 
median emargination in the front. There is a minute rudiment 
of a fourth lateral tooth on the right side only. 


Family XANTHID&. 


CARPILODES RUBER A. Milne- Edwards. i 

Carpilodes ruber A. Milne-Edwards, Nouv. Arch. Mus. Hist. 
Nat. Paris, vol. i. 1866, p. 228, pl. xi. figs. 4-40. ; 

Without special locality ; 2 9 immature, 13 mm. and 14°4 mm. 
wide. They retain a deep crimson colour in alcohol. 

Home Lagoon, Hermite ; under stones; July and August, 1912; 
No. 108: 3 2 (1 mature, 2 young). 


ATERGATIS OCYROE (Herbst). 

Atergatis floridus Aleock, Jour. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, vol. xvii. 
1898, p. 98. 

Without special locality: 1 g,1 2 juv. 


858 MISS M. J. RATHBUN ON CRUSTACEA 


PLATYPODIA GRANULOSA (Riippell). 


Lophactea granulosa Alcock, Jour. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, vol. 
Ixvii. 1898, p. 101. 


Without special locality: 3 ¢,2 9,2 juv. 


ACTA AFFINIS (Dana). 


Acteodes affinis Dana, Crust. U. 8. Expl. Exped., vol. i. 1852, 
p- 197; Atlas, 1855, pl. xi. fig. 3. 

Home Lagoon, Hermite; under stones; July 1912; No. 105: 
Se: 


ACT#HA GLANDIFERA, sp.n. (PI. I. fig. 5.) 


Type-locality. Monte Bello Islands: special locality not given ; 
26,1 2 (1 @ is type). 

Additional locality. Home Lagoon, Hermite, under stones ; July 
OZ aN On Oil aL Os. 

Dimensions. Type 3g, length 8:4 mm., width 12 mm, 

Closely related to Actea spinosissima Borradaile*, from which 
it differs in the character of its tubercles and spines rather than 
in their position. The tubercles of the dorsal surface are broad 
and arcuate as in spinosissima, but are thicker and less flattened 
and less petaloid, those toward the lateral margins being acorn- 
shaped. This is also the form of the five antero-lateral spines 
behind the orbit; in spinosissima they are long spines. The 
projections of the front are simply crenulations, not spines nor 
spiniform teeth. Spines of chelipeds short, stout, acorn-shaped, 
and directed a little forward as are those on the carapace. The 
spines on the legs are longer than on the chelipeds and are stout 
and subacute, not slender and elongate as in spinosissima. 

Although the five specimens are all larger than any specimen 
of spinosissima yet recorded, there is no indication of intergrading 
from one species to the other. 


GLYPTOXANTHUS CYMBIFER, sp.n. (Pls. J., I. figs. 6, 7.) 


Type-locality. Monte Bello Islands ; no special locality given : 
2 3 (lis type), 1 9. 

Dimensions. Type $, length of carapace 10°6 mm., width of 
same 17mm. Paratype 9, length of carapace 12°7 mm., width 
of same 20 mm. 

The carapace is closely covered with small bead granules, and 
is deeply areolated; the protogastric regions are divided into two 
oblong lobules by a longitudinal furrow; the branchial region 
bears about six lobules of irregular size, the two next the inner 
angle of the region being connected by a posterior elevation. 
There are four small tuberculiform teeth on the lateral margins 


* In Gardiner, Fauna Mald. & Laccad. Arch. i. Part 3, 1902, p. 256, text-tig. 53. 


FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 659 


behind the angle of the orbit; they are widely separated by a 
granular rim ; all these teeth except the posterior one are above 
the true margin, which inclines downward toward the angle of 
the buccal cavity, as in all the members of this genus. The 
frontal lobes are obliquely truncate, and separated by a broad, 
shallow V. 

The upper-outer surface of the carpus and the upper surface 
of the manus are occupied by deep, more or less rounded cavities, 
with rims which are microscopically granulated but appear smooth 
in relation to the general granulation of the body. The blackish- 
brown colour of the fingers runs far back on the lower part of the 
palm in the male, but is confined to the digits in the female; 
their granules are set in a felt-like background. 

The ambulatory legs are remarkable in having the upper 
surface of the carpal and propodal segments each occupied by a 
deep cavity bordered on the posterior margin by a thin rim, 
somewhat resembling a longitudinal section of a serpulid tube, 
and on the anterior margin by a thick band of pointed granules 
irregularly placed. 

Lower surface of crab hairy, the hairs of two kinds, one fine, 
the other coarse, but both soft. 

Glyptoxanthus has hitherto been known only from the coasts 
of middle America, West Africa, and the Cape Verde Islands. 

G. erosus (Stimpson) from the West Indian region attains a 
width of about 4em. When small, about the size of these spe- 
cimens of G. cymbifer, it has a granulated surface; with age 
the granules wear down smooth, giving it a much more eroded 
appearance. 

Our species differs from all the other described species in the 
curious hollows or cups on the chelipeds and legs. 


XANTHIAS ATROMANUS (Haswell). 


Aanthodes atromanus Haswell, Catal. Austral. Crust. 1882, 
joe AS), alle ie cies, I 


Home Lagoon, Hermite; June 1912; No. 106: 3 2 ovig., 
varying from 8°7 mm. to 13°6 mm. in width. 


PHYMODIUS UNGULATUS (Milne-Edwards). 


For variations, see Phymodius wngulatus Rathbun, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. 
vol. xxxv. 1907, p. 46, pls. iti. & iv. 


Monte Bello Islands: 1 9 immature. 

Length of carapace 8 mm., width 11 mm.; width of front, orbital 
angle excluded, 4 mm. 

In this specimen the areoles of the carapace are very much 
subdivided, the lateral marginal lobules obtuse except the last 
which has a very short spinule at the tip, the chelipeds are sub- 
equal, the palms have subparallel margins and acute tubercles, 
the fingers are slightly curved and have a narrow gape. 


660 MISS M. J. RATHBUN ON CRUSTACEA 


PILUMNUS VESPERTILIO (Fabricius). 


Pilumnus vespertilio Alcock, Jour. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, vol. Ixvii. 
1898, p. 192, and synonymy. 

Under stones, Home Lagoon, Hermite; July 1912; No. 106: 
EONS 


PILUMNUS CHRULESCENS A. Milne-Edwards, var. 


? Pilumnus cerulescens Aleock, Jour. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, vol. 
Ixvii. 1898, p. 196; Rathbun, Kgl. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. 
Skrifter, 7 Rekke, naturv. og mathem., vol. v. p. 355, pl. 1. 
fig. 15. 

Under stones, Home Lagoon, Hermite; July 1912; No, 106: 
orc 

Dimensions. Length of carapace 12:6 mm., width 16°8 mm. 

This is the same form as that which I recorded from the Gulf 
of Siam (doc. cit.). The specimen is considerably larger than any 
examined at that time, and some of the features are more sharply 
marked. Although all of the regions are ornamented with 
granules, they are not closely placed. The outer dentiform lobe 
of the front is separated from the rest of the front by a U-shaped 
gap. The two emarginations in the upper border of the orbit 
are well marked. The antero-lateral projections and also the 
subhepatic one are well developed spines; the orbital and sub- 
hepatic spines are shorter than the other three; these last have 
a stout base and form at the middle a shoulder from which a 
cluster of hairs proceeds. A striking feature of the cheliped is 
the presence on the upper margin of the merus of two strong 
white spines, one terminal, the other subterminal and larger. 
The carpus is armed with short, stout spines, the manus with 
granules; neither spines nor granules are closely placed, and the 
granules are absent from the lower distal corner of the larger 
palm. The ornamentation of the whole upper surface is obscured 
by the coarse hairs of uneven length. 

The colour in formalin and glycerine is brownish; the carapace 
has a ground of yellowish-brown, overlaid with patches of reddish- 
brown ; upper surface of legs with two patches of brownish-red 
on the merus, the carpus, and the propodus. 


ACTUMNUS SETIFER (de Haan). 


Actumnus setifer Alcock, Jour, Asiat. Soc. Bengal, vol. Ixvii. 
1898, p. 202. 

Monte Bello Islands: 1 ¢@. 

The areole of the undenuded carapace are high and very deeply 
separated and the lateral teeth very prominent; otherwise this 
individual does not differ from typical specimens from Japan. 


FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS, 661 


Family OcyPoDID &. 


Subfamily Ocypodinz. 


Uca rorcipata (Adams & White). (PI. II. fig. 8.) 


Gelasimus forcipatus Adams & White, Zool. * Samarang,’ 
Crust. 1848, p. 50. 

3 d, large, medium, and small, 

The cheliped of the largest specimen has the large distal tooth 
of the dactylus at more than 4 the distance from the tip; in the 
medium gpecimen, the tooth is at just the distal third. In the 
smallest specimen this tooth is absent, the specimen representing 
‘“‘form 2” of the species. 


Subfamily Mictyrine. 
Mictyris LoncicarPus Latreille. 
Mictyris longicarpus Alcock, Jour. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, vol. bxix. 
1900, p. 384, and synonymy. 
Monte Bello Islands: 10 3,2 @. 


Family [INACHID 2. 


Subfamily Acanthonyching. 


Hernia proteus (de Haan). 

Huenia proteus Aleock, Jour. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, vol. lxiv. 1895, 
p. 195, and synonymy. 

Dredged off Hermite; July 12,1912; No.115: 19 immature. 


Subfamily Pisinz. 


Hyastrenus oryx A. Milne-Edwards. 


Hyastenus oryx Alcock, Jour. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, vol. bxiv. 
1895, p. 214, and synonymy. 

Under stones in ‘lagoons’; June to Aug., 1912; No. 114: 
OR uve 


NAXIOIDES SERPULIFERA (Guérin), (PI. IT. figs. 9, 10.) 

Pisa serpulifera Guérin, Icon. Régne Anim., Crust. pl. vii. 
figs. 2, 2a, 2b, 2d. 1 

Nawia serpulifera Milne-Edwards, Hist. Nat. Crust., vol. 1. 
1834, p. 313. 

Monte Bello Islands: 1 2 mature. 

Under stones in ‘lagoons,’ June to Aug., 1912; No. 114: 1 9 
Juv. 

Dimensions. Length of carapace of large female to end of 
horns, 92 mm. ; width, exclusive of spines, 59 mm. 

An elongated sponge covers the upper surface of the right 


662 MISS M. J. RATHBUN ON CRUSTACEA 


rostral horn, and two other sponges are growing on the gastric 
region. 

The abdominal cavity is filled with young crabs in the adult 
state. The cavity is about 40 mm. wide, 39 mm. Jong, and about 
20 mm. high at the greatest extent ; the abdominal “appendages 
are very slender, so that the bulk of the space is occupied by the 
young, which number 162. These represent two stages, those of 
the first or earlier stage being 13 in number with carapace about 
3°5 mm. long; while those of the next or older stage are 149 in 
number and about 5:°7 mm. long. 

The younger ones although thin-shelled are harder and more 

opaque than the next stage, and correspond to what is known 
along the Atlantic coast of the United States as ‘ paper-shell ” 
evabs ; ; they are covered with minute red pigment spots; the 
carapace is almost smooth and naked, its shape is oblong, not 
subtriangular as in adults; the postocular tooth is well-formed, 
triangular and separated by a shallow sinus from the supraocular 
eave; this latter shows no trace of a spine; as to the tip of the 
rostrum, the inner of the two spines is well-developed and forms 
the true end of the horn ; on its outer side there is a faint prom- 
inence, which is later to become the strong lateral spine of the 
adult; the eyes are large, protruding, the cornea of a light 
br ownish-red colour. 

By the next moult, which takes place within the brood-pouch 
of the mother, the crab increases by more than half its former 
size, and undergoes several notable changes. The carapace is of 
similar form, bat the whole integument is soft and devoid of 
colour spots; it is no longer smooth and naked, but uneven and 
covered with crowded tubercles or granules, with the beginnings 
of the more prominent tubercles of the ‘adult ; the surface is 
more or less hairy, there being clusters of hooked hairs as in the 
adult, and above all, a row on each rostral horn which is con- 
tinued back on the carapace proper; the postocular cup forms a 
tooth which is separated by a triangular sinus from the supra- 
ocular eave, which last is armed witha small spine; rostral horns 
elongate, each armed with two subequal spines. In the adult, 
the postocular cup is separated from the supraocular eave only by 
a closed fissure. This indicates that WV. serpulifera is generically 
removed from the other Vaxioides and should be placed in the 


neighbourhood of Lissa Leach (Zool. Mise. vol. ii. 1815, p. 69). 


Subfamily Schizophrysine. 


SCHIZOPHRYS DAMA (Herbst). 


Cancer dama Herbst, Naturg. Krabben u. Krebse, vol. iil. 
part 4, 1804, p. 5, pl. 59. fig. 5. 

Schizophrys dama Miers, Challenger Rept. vol. xvii. part 49, 
1886, p. 67. Alcock, Jour. Asiat. Soc. Bengal, vol. lxiv. 1895, 
p- 245 and synonymy, but not “ Schizophrys aspera, p. pt.” 


FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 663 


Milne-Edwards, given in Kossmann’s synonymy; Illus. Zool. 
‘Investigator,’ Crust. Part vi. 1898, pl. xxxv. figs. 2, 2a. 

Under stones in ‘lagoons’; Monte Bello Islands; June to 
Aug., 1912; No. 114: 1 2 juv. 20°3 mm. long, including rostrum, 
14 mm. wide. 

This specimen already shows the second or posterior spine on 
the outer margin of the rostral horn; it is considerably smaller 
than the anterior spine. It is not shown in the ‘ Investigator’ 
figure. 

Distribution. Straits of Malacca (Alcock) ; West Australia, 
3 to 5 fathoms (ers). 


Family PARTHENOPID4S. 


PartHENOPE (RHINOLAMBRUS) PELAGICA (Riippell). 

Lambrus (Rhinolambrus) pelagicus Alcock, Jour. Asiat. Soc. 
Bengal, vol. Ixiv. 1895, p. 267, and synonymy. 

Home Lagoon, Hermite; June 13, 1912; No. 103a: 16. 

Special locality not given: Go 


Order STOM ATOPODA. 


PRorosquInnA TRISPINOSA (Dana). (PI. IL. figs. 11, 12.) 
See Borradaile, in Willey’s Zool. Results, Part iv. 1902, p. 400. 


Dredged off Hermite, 3 fathoms ; in hole in piece of rock; 
Silva, NOM pINow) Wi: Oe 

Special locality not given: 1 @, variety. 

Length of larger specimen (variety) 41 mm., of smaller speci- 
men 25 mm. 

The smaller specimen agrees with Borradaile’s amended 
description and figure, except that the fourth abdominal segment 
is corrugated much as the fifth is, only more faintly ; the sides of 
the first, second, and third segments are also lightly carinated 
with three or four smooth ridges. 

The larger specimen, which I take to be the same species, has 
some curious differences. The fourth abdominal segment and the 
sides of the first, second, and third are nearly smooth, which 
brings the specimen nearer to Borradaile’s, which was of the 
same size. ‘he fifth segment is bordered posteriorly by fine 
spinules. On the sixth and seventh segments, the spinules are 
shorter and stouter than in the small specimen, telson considerably 
wider than long, its three knobs less circular than in Borradaile’s 
figure and in our small specimen, the outer knobs pear-shaped, 
the inner one subtriangular; the marginal lobes are not curved 
inward and are separated by shorter slits than in the smaller 
specimen ; there is a carina parallel to the lateral margin, armed 
like the margin with spinules. 

Colour-markings. —Vhe specimens are preserved in formalin and 


664 ON CRUSTACEA FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 


glycerine. The larger one has small brownish spots regularly 
arranged in transverse rows: two pairs on the carapace, one pair 
anterior, one pair more widely separated, at the middle, and a 
row of four on the posterior half; a row of four on the sixth 
thoracic segment, and the first, third, and fourth abdominal seg- 
ments; a row of two on the second, fifth, and seventh abdominal 
segments. Knobs on telson olive-green, mottled. Uropods with 
a broad band of reddish-brown across the middle. Swollen part 
of chela white. The spotting of the smaller specimen is not so 
distinct and there are in addition many finer, branched spots 
down the middle of the animal, much as in Borradaile’s figure. 


GoNoDACTYLUS CHIRAGRA (Fabricius) var. smirHit Pocock. 

See Borradaile, in Willey’s Zool. Results, Part iv. 1902, p. 400. 

Home Lagoon, Hermite, under rock; July 13,1912; No. 117a: 
le he 

‘his is the variety (Borradaile, loc. cit.), in which the keels of 
the sixth abdominal segment and telson are considerably com- 
pressed ; the keels of the sixth segment are produced without 
constriction into long spines; the upper edge of the middle keel 
of the telson is produced backward into a spine; and the flukes 
of the anchor are formed by two narrow ridges running forward 
from the hinder end of that keel. The dark spots on the first 
five abdominal segments are not visible as the whole body is very 
dark in the preserved specimen except the swollen part of the 
chele, that of the manus being a deep blue, and of the dactylus a 
pinkish-red. 


EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. 


Prate I. 
Fig. 1. Periclimenes hermitensis, type 2, side view, X 2. 
. Periclimenes hermitensis, type 9 , rostrum, side view, X 5}. 
. Periclimenes hermitensis, type 2, rostrum and antenne, dorsal view, X 44. 
. Thalamita dispar, type 8, dorsal view, X 2. 
. Actea glandifera, type 3, dorsal view, X 3. 
Glyptoxanthus cymbifer, 2, dorsal view, X 2. 


> OV 9 be 


PuateE II. 


Vig. 7. Glyptoxanthus cymbifer, type g, ventral view, * 2. 
8. Uca forcipata, showing outer surface of chela of largest , X 11. 
9. Nasxioides serpulifera, young, first stage, < 12. 
10. Nawioides serpulifera, young, second stage, X 12. 
11. Protosquilla trispinosa, 2, dorsal view, X 2. 
12. Protesquitla trispinosa, variety, 2 , dorsal view, X 2. 


ON MOLLUSCA FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 665 


37. Report on Mollusca collected at the Monte Bello 
Islands. By Tom Irepate * 


[Received March 18, 1914: Read June 9, 1914. ] 


(Text-figure 1.) 


INDEX. Page 

Geooraphicalerel ations Myspace seteee se eereeeeesescese-eeseicnitecinneaseie eters OOD 

Bistrot Shellsicollectedteaee-.eetrernceecre costo ceserceeeeesesencaciaensccte crs: OOO 
Systematic :— ; 

J UETOR TACs, SIS 1D oocigeeesn sen abo pbnnOn ebb ox non DedccDoneEcHEEE | OL 

Subularia montebelloensis, sp.N. ....... Be bon Cac coucer so Ree ere mn oH Ka) 

Scaphella hedleyi, nom. nov., for 8. act depsmeeeacoaree od ON 


The small collection brought back by Mr. P. D. Montague is 
still of much interest on account of the geographical position of 
the group. 

Hedley, in the Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. vol. xxvii. pp. 876— 
883 (1903), introduced divisional names to indicate the different 
faunal elements recognisable in the Marine Fauna of Australia. 
He determined four primary divisions, to which he gave the 
names Adelaidean, Peronian, Solanderian, and Dampierian 
Regions. The limits of the Adelaidean Region were noted as 
probably being Wilson’s Promontory in Victoria and Geraldton 
in West Australia, embracing the whole southern coast of 
Australia and round the south-west corner. The Peronian 
Region designated the East Coast from Wilson’s Promontory 
north to Moreton Bay in South Queensland. The Solanderian 
Region was given to the remainder of the Queensland coast 
northwards to Torres Straits; whilst the Dampierian Region 
extended westwards from Torres Straits to Houtmann’s Abrolhos, 
scarcely north of Geraldton, West Australia. 

Verco (Trans. Roy. Soc. South Austr. vol. xxxvi. pp. 202-205, 
1912) has now given a list of common Geraldton and Houtmann’s 
Abrolhos marine molluses, which have been clearly shown to 
belong to the Adelaidean Region, as out of a total of 150 species, 
71 per cent. were also found in South Australia. This suggests 
that the limit of the Adelaidean must be placed north of 
Houtmann’s Abrolhos, and I can now show that few Adelaidean 
forms extend as far north as the Monte Bello Group. 

Hedley recently catalogued the Queensland Marine Molluscan 
Fauna (Proc. Austr. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Brisbane, 1909, pp. 343— 
371 & 809-810), when he mentioned over 1800 species. Very 
numerous additions have since been made. 

No list: of West Australian Marine Mollusca is known to me, 
but it would be of great advantage to zoogeographers were such, 
when prepared, shown under Hedley’s regional names. 


* Communicated by Prof. J, Srantey Garprner, M.A., F.RS., F.Z.8. 


666 MR. TOM IREDALE ON MOLLUSCA 


The present collection only numbers forty-four species and 
it is typically Dampierian; only one Adelaidean form, Conus 
anemone Lamarck, occurring in it. The nomenclature and 
sequence of species here used are based upon Hedley’s Queensland 
List above noted, the few alterations made being accompanied by 
notes which I submit to Mr. Hedley’s consideration. For it must 
be acknowledged that all work on Australian molluses has 
been rendered easy by the unparalleled energy displayed by 
Mr. Hedley, and his knowledge of the literature and forms is 
so complete that I know I am more likely than he to have 
erred. 

In the British Museum there is preserved a collection made at 
the Monte Bello Islands and presented to that Institution by 
Mr. T. H. Haynes. This collection has not been determined, and 
includes about fifty additional species. I have not had time to 
investigate the nomenclature of these forms, but as far as z0o- 
eeosraphical relations are concerned they seem to confirm the 
present collection in its entirety. 

In the following List I note the word Solanderian against all 
those included in Hedley’s Queensland List :— 


Arca fusca Bruguiere, 1789, Solanderian. 
Malleus malleus Linne, 1758, do. 
Ostreea cucullata Born, 1778. do. 
Chlamys radula Linné, 1758. do. 

5 squamosus Gmelin, 1791, var. 

55 lentiginosus Reeve, 1853, var, do. 
Lima lima Linné, 1758, do. 


,, multicostata Sowerby, 1843. 
» fragilis Chemnitz. 


Modiolus philippinarum Hanley, 1844. do. 
Cardita incrassata Sowerby, 1825. do. 
Cardium dupuchense Reeve, 1845. do. 
is unedo Linneé, 1758. do. 
Tridacna elongata Lamarck, 1819. do. 
Antigona tiara Dillwyn, 1817. do. 
Paphia titerata Linné, 1758. do. 
Acanthopleura spinosa Bruguiére, 1792. do. 
gemmata Blainville, 1825. do. 

Haliotis sguamata Reeve, 1846. do. 
= varia Linné, 1758, var. do. 
Euchelus atratus Gmelin, 1791. do. 
Turbo squamosus Gray, 1847, do. 
Nerita albicilla Linné, 1758. do. 
Acmeea saccharina Linné, 1758, var. do. 
Cerithium fasciatum Bruguiére, 1792. do. 


Hulima montagueana, sp.n. 

Subularia montebelloensis, sp. n. 

Cymatium aquatile Reeve, 1844. do. 
Natica vitellus Linné, 1758. do. 


FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 667 


Cyprea caputserpentis inne, 1758. Solanderian. 
5 caurica Linné, 1758. do. 
x cylindrica Bon, ess do. 
iS erosa Linné, 1758. do. 
a errones Linné, 1758. do. 
moneta Tiara 1758. do. 
Scaphella volva Gmelin, Weeike do. 
Bs zebra Leach, 1814, var. do. 


a. hedleyi, nom. nov. 
Voluta oblita Smith, 1909 (=norrisii auct.). 


Ancilla elongata Gray, 1847. do. 
Conus anemone Lamarck, 1810. 

Arcularia suturalis Lamarck, 1822. do. 
Rhodostoma auris-felis Bruguiére, 1789. do. 


Bullaria columellaris Menke, 1843. 


Note.—As regards generic denominations I would consider the 
following alterations preferable :— 


Cardium unedo should be Fragum unedo. 
Ancilla elongata is Amalda elongata. 
Arcularia suturalis , Alectrion suturalis. 


The species noted seem to differ sufficiently from the types of 
the genera first named to merit generic distinction. 

Cardita incrassata Sowerby and Cyprea caputserpentis Linné 
occur in Verco’s Geraldton List, but as both are marked as not 
occurring in South Australia, they are obviously stragelers from 
the north, and probably there reach their southern limit. 

It will at once be observed that almost all the species occur 
also in the Solanderian Region, whilst it is certain that some of 
those not so marked do occur there, e.g. Lima multicostata 
Sowerby*. The element characterising the Dampierian Region is 
not well marked in the present eollection, the only notable species 
being the Scaphelle, but it must again be observed that the 
Adelaidean element is almost completely absent, which fact is of 
some importance. 


Mop10oLus PHILIPPrINARUM Hanley, 1&44. 


Under this name I include specimens which I compared with 
the presumptive type specimens in the British Museum. I, how- 
ever, cannot see any differences worthy of consideration between 
these and the type (presumably) specimens of J/odiola metcalfei 
Hanley. 

In the Proc. Zool. Soc. (Lond.) 1844, pp. 14-17, there is a 
paper entitled “‘ Descriptions of a new species of Mytilacea &c.,’ 
by Sylvanus Hanley. This paper was read Feb. 13, 1844, and 
published in July 1844. On p. 14 is described Modiola metealfei 
from “ Hab. ?, Mus. Cuming, Hanley”; and on p. 15, JL. philippi- 
narum from “Hab. Zebu, Philippinarum, Mus. Cuming, Hanley.” 

* J note that Hedley (Mem. Austr. Mus. iv. 1902, p. 309) regarded this as simply a 


variety of Lima lima Linné 1758, which would account for its omission from his 
Queensland List. 


Proc. Zoot. Soc.—1914, No. XLVi. 46 


668 MR. TOM IREDALE ON MOLLUSCA 


If this were the first introduction, I/. metcalfei has priority, but 
in Hanley’s ‘ Bivalve Shells,’ these two species are again described 
and figured. ‘The locality given for both species is the Philippine 
Tslands, and the specimens above noted from the Cuming Collection 
are so labelled. Both names appear on the same page, but here 
again I. metcalfei appears first. According to the data given 
in the Introduction to the work this page appeared in 1843! 
Whichever appeared first, I conclude that MZ. metcalfer would 
claim usage in preference to MZ. philippinarum. Ii 1t be conceded 
that both species were described from the same locality, there 
cannot be the slightest hesitation in accepting the identity of 
the two species, the very slight difference in form being almost 
certainly due to age. 

ANTIGONA TIARA (Dillwyn, 1817) *. 

In illegally rejecting Cytherea of Bolten 1798 and accepting 
Antigona Schumacher 1817 in its stead, Jukes-Browne (Proce, 
Malac. Soc. (Lond.) vol. xi. p. 70, 1914) has unwittingly selected 
the most appropriate name. For a valid reason for the rejection 
of Cytherea Bolten 1798 exists in the fact that there is a prior 
Cytherea of Fabricius, Ent. Syst. vol. iv. p. 413, 1794, as well as 
a Cythere O. F. Miller, Entomostraca, p. 63, 1785. This was 
unknown to Jukes-Browne and overlooked by Dall, Hedley, 
and Suter, who have recently used Bolten’s name. According to 
nomenclators, Antigona Schumacher 1817 was predated by Aznta- 
gonus Htibner 1816, and hence, according to British usage, 
invalid ; but Sherborn has shown that Antigonus was not 
published by Hiibner until 1820, leaving Antigona unassailable. 
This detail was also unknown to Jukes-Browne as to most 
malacologists. 


ACANTHOPLEURA SPINOSA (Bruguiere, 1792). 
Specimens of large size were obtained, and these seem inter- 


esting on account of the southern distribution, this being the 
furthest south record I have traced. 


ACANTHOPLEURA GEMMATA (Blainville, 1825). 


For the past five years I have been studying the forms of the 
genus Acanthopleura, especially with relation to those grouped by 
Pilsbry (Man. Conch. vol. xiv. pp. 221-226, 1893) under the name 
Acanthopleura spiniger Sowerby. This would seem an appropriate 
place to note generally the points raised. 

Hedley has accepted for the species name Linné’s Chiton 
aculeatus, but I agree with Pilsbry in rejecting this as indeter- 
minable. Pilsbry, however, discarded Chiton gemmatus Blainville 
(Dict. Sci. Nat. vol. xxxvi. p. 544, 1825) and selected Chiton 
spiniger Sowerby (Mag. Nat. Hist. 1840, p. 287, Suppl. pl. xvi. 
fig. 2) instead. 

* {The parentheses around the names of authors placed after scientific names in 


this paper are used in accordance with Article 23 of the International Rules of 
Nomenclature (Proc. 7th Int. Cong. Boston, 1907, p. 44 (1912))—Epiror. | 


FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 669 


T can see no flaw in Blainville’s description, and the locality 
“New Holland” suggests that it might have been brought home 
from Torres Straits where it was very common, or it might even 
have been collected by Peron and Lesueur at Shark’s Bay, West 
Australia, whence Thiele (Die Fauna Siidwest Australiens, 
vol. i. p. 398, 1911) has recently recorded it under the name 
Acanthopleura spuriger Sowerby. 

Sowerby’s Chiton spiniger was of unknown locality, and the 
figure 1s somewhat abnormal as to the length of the spines on 
the girdle. 

Pilsbry included A. spiniger Sowerby in the typical subgenus 
(A. spinosa (Bruguiere) being the type of the genus) and proposed 
a new subgenus Amphitomura (Nautilus, Jan. 1893, p. 105) for 
Ch. borbonicus Deshayes, admitting Ch. brevispinosus Sowerby 
as distinct from that species but referable to the same subgenus. 
These two are practically from the same locality, and typical 
specimens prove their identity. 

From the Red Sea comes a form which has just as commonly 
been referred to A. “ spiniger” as to any other species, Pilsbry 
making note of this. I have examined ma ny Specimens, and this is 
undoubtedly referable to the species brevispinosa, but as certainly 
subspecifically separable. This form, which should bear Roche- 
brune’s name balanse, completely breaks down any subgeneric 
distinction between brevispinosa and gemmata; but the latter is 
just as clearly subgenerically recognisable when contrasted with 
spinosa. 

Pilsbry included Ch. echinatus Barnes under Acanthopleura, 
though forming a subgenus (Jesotomura, Nautilus, Jan. 1893, 
p. 103) for it. I would reject this species from the genus, so that 
my genus Acanthopleura would read :— 


ACANTHOPLEURA. 
Subgenus Acanthopleura. 
spinosa Bruguiere. 
Subgenus dAmphitomura. 
brevispinosa Sowerby 
(=borbonica Desh.) 
with several subspecies. 
gemmata Blainville 
=spuriger Sowerby) 
with several ‘subspecies. 
Subgenus Maugeria. 
granulata Gmelin. 


I must note that dissection of the type of Chiton cunninghami 
Reeve, described from ‘ Australia,” proves that shell to be 
identical with brevispinosa and the locality incorrect. 


TURBO SQUAMOSUS Gray, 1847. 

Hedley included in his List a Turbo foliaceus Philippi, 1846. 

In the Zeitschr. fiir Malak. (Menke) 1846, p. 98, Philippi 
46* 


670 MR. TOM TREDALE ON MOLLUSCA 


described Turbo lamellosus. In the Conch.-Cab. {Kiister) Turbo, 
p- 41, Philippi figured this species, but renamed it Turbo foliaceus 
as his former name was preoccupied by Broderip. This would 
seem to be the entry quoted by Hedley, the titlepage of the 
volume giving 1846. In the British Museum copy of this work 
the dates of publication have been collated, as the titlepage date: 
veferred only to the first few pages. I there find that page 41 
appeared in 1847. 

Gray, in the Narr. Surv. Voy. ‘ Fly,’ vol. ii. p. 359, fig. 8, pl. 1. 
1847, described the same shell from Port Essington under the 
name J'urbo squamosus. There is no question of priority, how- 
ever, as there is a prior J'urbo foliaceus Gmelin (Syst. Nat. p. 3602, 
1791) invalidating Philippi’s name, : 

I have noted that Reeve (Conch. Icon. Turbo, fig. 17, 1848) 
gave the name 7urbo laminiferus to the same species, and that 
specimens from Torres Straits were independently named Z'urbo 
foliaceus by Hombron and Jacquinot, which name was published 
by Rousseau in the Voy. Péle Sud, vol. v. 1854, p. 60. The 
ficures (Moll. pl. xiv. figs. 34-37) may have been issued earlier, 
but I have no data, and the invalidity of the name obviates any 
inquiry. 


AcM#A SACCHARINA (Linné, 1758), var. 


Under the above name I have included two specimens. 

In his Queensland List Hedley admitted two species of Aemea 
under the names, Aemcea costata Sowerby 1839, and dAemaa 
saccharina Linné 1758. Why the former name was used I cannot 
say, as in the Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 1904, p. 189, Hedley himself 
went into the matter of the nomenclature of the Sydney shell 
known as Acmca costata Sowerby and endeavoured to prove that 
name inapplicable, and that the correct name was dAemea alti- 
costata Angas (Proe Zool. Soc. (Lond.) 1865, p. 56, pl. ii. fig. 1) 
given toa South Australian form. I have not seen any contro- 
version of Hedley’s argument, so with the help of Mr. G. C, 
Robson, of the British Museum, I tried to clear the matter 
up. Working at this group Mr. Robson recovered the spe- 
cimen from which the figure of Lottia? costata Sowerby (Zool. 
Beechey’s Voy. 1839, p. 147, pl. xxxix. fig. 1) was prepared, and 
it proves to have the data “ Arica, Peru” on the back of the 
tablet. It is obviously not the Australian shell, and this discovery 
absolutely disposes of Sowerby’s name as referable to the Sydney 
Acmea. 

The same species occurs in South Queensland, but in North 
Queensland it is replaced by a different species, which Hedley 
catalogued as Acmea saccharina Linné 1758. At Port Curtis. 
I collected a series of specimens, and the determination of the 
name to be used has caused quite a lot of trouble. 

Mr. Robson has investigated the question of the type locality 
of Linné’s Acmea saccharina and has fixed this as the Philippine 


FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 671 


Islands. This is necessary, as there can be no question that, due 
to the wide range of the species, it can and must be divided into 
subspecies. In the latest Monograph of the family, Pilsbry (Man. 
Conch. vol. xiii. p. 49 et seg., 1891) did not determine these but 
admitted demca saccharina Linné, quoting as a synonym Patella 
lane Reeve: p. 50, var. stellaris Q. & G., giving as synonyms 
stella Lesson and %octoradiata Hutton, and naming p. 50, var. 
perplexa nov., from Australia, quoting under this name 2 stellaris 
Reeye and octoradiata Hutton. He accepted Sowerby’s name 
costata for the Australian shell, synonymising with it Angas’s 
alticostata. In the Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 1904, p. 188, 
Hedley put on record that Pilsbry’s var. perplexa was absolutely 
Hutton’s octoradiata, and that this was a valid species. There 
can be no question about this, but Hedley accepted Hutton’s 
name, whereas he should have chosen Pilsbry’s, as Hutton’s name 
was invalidated by Patella octoradiata Gmelin, Syst. Nat. p. 3699, 
1791. 

Suter, reviewing New Zealand Acmeide (Proc. Malac. Soc. 
(Lond.) vol. vii. pp. 315-326, 1907), recognised in Patella stella 
Lesson (Voy. ‘Coquille,’ vol. 11. p. 421, 1831) the shell commonly 
known as corticata Hutton, but admitted the form Hutton named, 
with subspecific rank. He also pointed out its alliance with the 
Australian 4. alticostata Angas. The New Zealand species is 
- certainly specifically distinct from every form of sacchurina. 

At the same place Suter admitted octoradiata Hutton, and 
placed these two species in a subgenus Collisellina. This name 
was proposed by Dall (Amer. Journ. Conch. vol. vi. p. 259, 1871) 
for his section B, which covered saccharina Linné and borneensis 
Reeve. In the Voy. de l’Astrol., Zool. vol. iii. pt. ii. p. 349, 1835, 
Quoy and Gaimard introduced their genus Patellotda for southern 
Limpet-like forms with distinct anatomical features. In 1847 
Gray designated as type P. rugosa Q. & G., and as this is one of 
the original members of the genus this selection must stand. 
I suggest that P. rugosa Q. & G. is a member of the present 
group, and that Patellotda Quoy and Gaimard should displace 
Collisellina Dall. The group is well defined and easily recog- 
nisable. 

Patelloida stellaris Q. & G. for a New Ireland shell, which is 
certainly not identical with the North Australian form, is invalid 
on account of Bolten’s Patella stellaris (Mus. Bolten. p. 12, 1798) 
given to a different form of A. saccharina. 

Patella lanw Reeve was described from Japan. 

Other early names given to saccharina-like shells are all in- 
applicable to the Australian form, which is therefore unnamed. 
These differ appreciably from typical specimens, whether specimens 
from Monte Bello Islands, Port Essington, Cape York, or Port 
Curtis are contrasted, and I therefore note them as 4. saccharina 
Linné, var. 

Verco referred the shells from South-West Australia to 4. alti- 
costata, and specimens in the British Museum labelled West 


672 MR. TOM IREDALE ON MOLLUSCA 


Australia and Swan River, West Australia, confirm this dis- 
position, as they closely approach the South-Kast Australian species 
and are very different from any form of Aemea saccharina. 

These sketchy remarks must well show the confusion that exists 
in this family, and the urgent need of ‘a skilful and careful 
monographer. 

My notes would read easily if summarised thus :—dAemea 
saccharina Linné. ‘Type locality, Philippine Islands, divisible 
into subspecies: Patella lanx Reeve, Japan, one valid name. 
Patelloida stellaris Quoy & Gaimard, New Ireland: form probably 
recognisable, name invalid, Subspecies ranging from Cape York 
westwards to Monte Bello Islands and southwards to Port 
Curtis, recognisable but unnamed. 

Acme saccharina, var. perplexa Pilsbry is a distinet species, 
commonly called Aemea octoradiata Hutton, but Hutton’s name 
is Invalid. 

Acnuea alticostata Angas is the name for the Sydney shell, 
which ranges southwards through Bass Straits and then west- 
wards to Geraldton, West Australia, and this is quite a valid 
species. Sowerby’s Lottia ? costata (type preserved in the British 
Museum) came from Arica, Peru, and has no connection with the 
Australian shell erroneously so-called, 

Acmea stella Lesson, from New Zealand, is closely allied to 
A. alticostata Angas, bar is certainly separable as a distinet 
species. 

The group is well marked and has been classed under Colli- 
sellina Dall 1871, but Quoy and Gaimard’s genus name Patelloida 
seems to claim usage on account of Gray’s designation of P rugosa 


Q. & G. as type. I regard this species as certainly referable to 
this group. 


EULIMA MONTAGUEANA, sp. n. (Text-fig. 1 A, B.) 


Shell of medium size for the genus, thin, smooth, solid, glassy, 
imperforate, not translucent, variced, many-whorled, sutures 
impressed. Colour milk-white. In shape it 1s she anply conical 
with the spire somewhat tending backwards. The largest specimen 
has the apex missing, but fourteen whorls remain. The next in 
size, which I select as the type, has the apical whorl somewhat 
bulbous and succeeded by fifteen whorls, the basal three or four 
whorls showing a peripheral keel. Varices regularly sueceeding 
and advancing | spirally can be observed on the last ten whorls - 
on the spire shins these are too indistinct for recognition. 

Aperture obliquely pyriform, outer lip simple but not thin, 
base somewhat contracted; columella straight and reflected as a 
slight callus which extends across the body-whorl to join ‘the 
outer lip at the posterior angle. 

Length of type 17-5 mm., “breadth 5:5 mm. 


Pavia. Off Hermite Island, Monte Bello Group. Dredged in 
4 fathoms 


FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 673 
Remarks. Melanella Bowdich 1822 has been shown to have 
priority over Hulima Risso 1826; but as the type of the former 
is a “humpbacked” species it has been suggested that these 
might be separated generically, and Hulima might be retained 
with the conventional usage. 
I have not yet examined the type of Melanella, but Austra- 
lasian “ humpbacks ” seem to have apical features very distinct 
from species of Hulima occurring with them. 


Text-figure 1. 


’ 


Cc 


A, Side view of Hulima montagueana showing lateral ascending varices. 
B. Front view of Hulima montaqueana. 
C. Subularia montebelloensis. 


SUBULARIA MONTEBELLOENSIS, sp. n. (Text-figure | C.) 


Shell small, thin, not translucent, slender, aciculate, imper- 
forate, glossy, white, many-whorled, smooth. Apex very slender, 
the apical whorl minute with sixteen succeeding whorls, the 
sutures indistinct but followed by a transparent band, the 
remainder of the whorl milky. 

The last whorl has the periphery rounded and varices do not 
appear to be present. The aperture is oval, anteriorly broadened 
and subehannelled ; columella truncate, advancing obliquely and 
slightly reflected as a callus extending across the body-whorl, 

Length of type 12°5 mm., breadth 3 mm. 


674 MR. TOM IREDALE ON MOLLUSCA 


Habitat. Off Hermite Island, Monte Bello Group. Dredged in 
4 fathoms. 

Remarks. A vague resemblance to Lulima acicula Gould may 
account for the previous non-recognition of this species. Tryon 
(Man. Conch. vol. viii. 1886) synonymised with that species, 
aciculata Sowb.. pyramidalis Sowb., and vitrea A. Ad., an in- 
congruous combination needing no criticism, but since that time 
little work appears to have been done on this group as regards 
Indo-Pacific species. 

Tryon placed these in Zulima in the section Subularia Monte- 
rosato, which name was proposed to replace Leiostraca Adams, 
which was considered preoccupied. As there is a prior Leio- 
stracus as well as Liostraca and Liostracus, | would agree in 
rejecting Letostraca. 

This species is not a typical Subularia, but might be refer- 
able to Monterosato’s section Acicularia, but that name 1s pre- 
occupied. 


Natica virecivs (Linné, 1758). 


I had determined the Monte Bello shell as Verita rufa Born, 
and noted its absence from Hedley’s Queensland List, before I 
received my friend’s latest paper (Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 
vol. xxxvili. 1913), where on p. 299 he recorded this species from 
Palm Island, Queensland, and noted that the correct name for 
the species was as given above. 


SCAPHELLA ZEBRA Leach, 1814, var. 


The shells do not agree with typical S. zebra, from the East 
Coast of Australia. In the British Museum, similar shells from 
West Australia were named S. ellioti Sowerby. Upon investi- 
gation this name was found to have been given to a North 
Avstralian shell (Journ. de Conch. 3rd ser. vol. iv. p. 358, 1864; 
vol. v. p. 25, pl. 11. fig. 19, 1865), and the figure did not agree 
with West Australian examples. As far as I can trace, no name 
has yet been given to the West Australian shell. I, however, 
forbear its nomination, and in preference record it as above: 
it cannot be called S. tuwrneri, as the figure of Voluta turnert 
Griffith and Pidgeon (Anim. Kingdom Cuy, vol. xii. Moll. pl. x. 
fig. 1, Index, p. 601, 1834: no locality given) shows quite a 
different shell. 


SCAPHELLA HEDLEYI, nom. nov. 


Scaphella reticulata (Reeve) does not appear in Hedley’s 
Queensland List, but was added to that fauna by Shirley (Proce. 
Roy. Soc. Queensland, vol. xxiii. p. 99,1911) from the Gulf of 
Carpentaria. 

The species was described by Reeve in the Proc. Zool. Soe. 
(Lond.) 1845, p. 144, under the name Voluta reticulata, and 
figured in the Conch. Icon., Voluta, sp. 25, pl. xi. figs. 25, a-b. 


FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 675 


That name, however, had been previously utilised by Linné 
(Syst. Nat. 12th ed. p. 1190, 1767) and Martyn (Univ. Conch. 
vol. iv. fig. 126, 1787), and as I have noted no synonymy I 
propose to rename Reeve’s species as above. It gives me great 
pleasure to associate with such a beautiful shell the name of my 
friend Mr. C. Hedley. Sowerby’s V. gatliffi, described from North 
Australia, differs in shape as well as coloration, and I know no 
other species that can be compared with this. 


Conus ANEMONE Lamarck, 1810. 


Tn his latest paper cited above Hedley (p. 307) gave some notes 
on this species, observing that the West Australian shell seemed to 
be typical and noted it from Port Essington and also Tasmania. 
My specimens from Monte Bello Islands agree with his conclusions, 
so I anticipate that Verco’s Geraldton record would also agree. If 
it be conceded that the East Australian shells are only sub- 
specifically distinct (my own shells from Sydney, New South Wales, 
and Lord Howe Island agree with Hedleys remarks) then the 
names to be used would be 


Conus anemone Lamarck. North, West, and South Australia ; 


of which C. novehollandie A. Adams is an absolute synonym ; 
and 


Conus maculosus Sowerby. Hast Australia and Lord Howe 
Island ; 


with jukesii Reeve, maculatus Sowerby, and rossitert Brazier, as 
absolute synonyms. 


R#HODOSTOMA AURIS-FELIS (Bruguiére, 1789). 


The genus name here used was introduced by Swainson, Treat. 
Malac. pp. 208, 344, 1840, the species cited being coffe Chemn. 
120, f. 1043; fabula Feér. Tab. Syst. 105, n. 24; and nucleus id. 
ib. n. 26. In the Tab. Syst. Moll. Férussac, p. 109 (or 105) 
included fabula in Auricula (Conovulus), and then proposed 
Auricula (Cassidula) felis Lamarck=coffea Chemn., and added 
Auricula nucleus without any subgeneric designation. Cassidula 
has been used for the group typified by auris-felis Bruguiére 
(=coffea Chemn.) ever since this introduction, which only dates 
from 1821. In the Syst. Anim. p. 348, 1801, twenty years pre- 
viously, Lamarck had proposed Cassidulus for an Echinid, which 
name is now generally accepted as invalidating Cassidwla. 


ON CEPHALOPODA FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 677 


38. Cephalopoda from the Monte Bello Islands. 
By G. C. Rozson, B.A.* 


[Received March 18, 1914: Read June 9, 1914. | 


(Text-figure 1.) 


INDEX. 
Structure : Page 
Radula, mandibles, poe ee of Sepiadariwm 
CUFURHT Oy SDo1s- sonaccocooc9 sosonayocconscoodeacceannne LOE (ots) 


Variation, &c.: 
Differences between Peay eee and Sa ees 


stunmarized . paene ee 677 
eeuie sar imm natnibuam, sp. n., Gntern me vediate betwe een 
epiadarium and Sepioloided .............20000-..... 877 


Geographical Zoology : 
Distribution of Sepiadariwn auritum, probably 


DUO MALO USA eae ee ee ee Ons 
Systematic : 
SCPC PONTO. GOUFUCRUID, SOs Ne cosooenceacdonscosespouane Whe’ 


Of the two species of Cephalopoda obtained by Mr. P. D. 
Montague from the Monte Bello Islands, one specimen is of 
considerable interest—-a Myopsid which has been referred after 
some hesitation to Sepiadarium. 

The differences between the latter genus and the closely-allied 
Sepioloidea, though they have been touched upon by several 
authors, have not been fully summarized as yet. The following 
table gives the more important differences :— 


Sepradarium Steenstrup. Sepioloidea d’Orb. 

1. Funnel attached to mantle by a .... by cartilaginous plugs of the 

ligament (1) (2). mantle that fit into sockets on 
the funnel (1) (2). 

2. Ventral pores absent (2). .... present (2). 

3. Mantle fringe absent (2). .... present (2). 

4. Fins short (4). 65 0 komme (2); 

5. The hectocotylized arm bearing Suckers of the hectocotylus per- 
on its distal half a series of sisting as small papille ; the arm 
transverse ridges, which are the grooved diagonally on its inner 
laterally produced peduncles of side (4). 


the suckers (4). 


In respect of Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 5 in the above list, the form 
here described is referable to Sepiadarium. The length of the 
fins, on the other hand, suggests aftinity with Sepioloidea. It is 
not desirable on such slender grounds, however, to create a new 
genus intermediate between the two forms under discussion for 
the reception of this species. But it is certain that in the 
present state of our knowledge we are entitled to regard this as 
an unusual form of Sepiadariwm, intermediate in respect of one 
character between that genus and Sepoloidea. 


* Communicated by Prof. J. Sranzey Garprner, M.A., F.RS., F.Z.8., and 
published by permission of the Trustees of the British Museum. 


678 MR. G. C. ROBSON ON CEPHALOPODA 


Up to the present Sepioloidea appears to be regarded as the 
Australian form of the two Sepiadarian genera, while Sepia- 
darium is considered the Pacific form. We now find that the 
latter extends its range to W. Australia, though not by a typical 
member of the genus. Whether, in the first instance, the 
distinction of the two forms into Pacific and Australian rested 
upon secure and sufficient evidence we camnot say as yet. If the 
investigation of the Cephalopod faunas of these areas upholds 
this distinction, the interest and importance of this species of 
Sepiadarium with Sepioloidea-chavacters, as occurring in the 
distributional area of the other genus, will be increased. 

The structure of the hectocotylus corresponds closely with that 
described by Brock (5) for Sepiadarium. It should be observed 
that the series of transverse ridges or bars (Brock’s ‘‘ Quer- 
balken”) are of such a shape as to suggest the obvious con- 
clusion that they represent the fused bases of the pairs of 
suckers, a proximal member of the morphologically posterior 
row being fused with a distal member of the morphologiealiy 
anterior row. 


1. SEPIADARIUM AURITUM, sp. n. (Text-fig. 1.) 


External appearance.—The animal is small and squat, the 
width of the mantle area being about equal to its length. The 
fins are rather long and ear-shaped, the inferior portion being 
slightly broader than the superior. ‘The mantle-insertion at the 
neck is tolerably broad, while posteriorly the edge of the mantle 
exhibits a very slight concavity. 

There is a very feebly developed interbrachial membrane. 
On the arms the suckers are arranged in two alternating rows, 
save at the distal third, where they become abruptly smaller and 
more irregularly disposed. 

The tentacular arms are provided with a short membrane 
conterminous with the area occupied by the suckers. 

The colour (formalin-preserved specimen) is dull grey, covered 
on the dorsal surface by numerous small round patches of pale 
red or brown and fine black or dark-brown spots. Only the 
latter are continued on to the ventral surface and the arms. The 
patches and spots are found, though more sparsely, upon the fins. 
For character of the hectocotylized arm, v. text-fig. 1, C. 

Dimensions :— 


Mantle, max. length 00. 11:25 mm. 
- max. breadth’ -9°%).\' 0. ea ae 
Wencthror tinsm tees: wn toe. 8°75 


Total length (from apex of mantle 
to interbrachial membrane of 
the weulbia) aeMis)\ sg... a 17 
Length of arms: Ist pair......... 7 
PASC Lape aes es Se 6°8 
9 
7 


FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 679 


Text-figure 1. 


— 


cy He Mb : 


| 


Sepiadarium auritwm. 


A. Dorsal view. X2: a, outline of fin. 
1. Attachment of funnel to mantle. X 2. 
C. Hectocotylus. x 6. 

D. Mandibles. x 12. 

E. Radula. 4 oc. X 6 obj. 


680 ON CEPHALOPODA FROM THE MONTE BELLO ISLANDS. 


Internal characters.—The mandibles (text-fig. 1, D). 

The radula (text-fig. 1, E) resembles that of S. kochii figured 
by Appellof (3) pretty closely ; but differs in the condition of the 
basal plate of the median tooth, which is much deeper and of a 
different shape, in certain characters of the lateral tooth and of 
the inferior marginal. It is unfortunately impossible to give a 
fuller account of the internal characters, owing to the fact that 
only one specimen is available for examination. 

Locality. Dredged off Hermite I. (Monte Bello Islands), 
W. Australia. 

Type in the British Museum (Zoological Department). 


2. POLYPUS sp. 


Two specimens from the same station (one immature). 
This form, which might be referable to more than one Pacific 
species, cannot be satisfactorily identified. 


Literature referred to. 


. JouBIN, L. Meém. Soc. Zool. France, xv. 1902, p. 81. 
. Sreenstrur, J. K. Danske Vidensk. Selsk. Skrift., 6 Raekke, 
1881, p. 214. 
. Appettor, A. Abh. Senckenb. Naturf. Ges., Bd. xxiv. 1898, 
p- 061. 
Petseneer, P, Lankester’s Treatise of Zoology. Mollusca. 
Brock, J. Zeitschrift fur wiss. Zool. xl. 1884, p. 105, 


we 


ae 


ON A NEW LIZARD FROM THE CANARY ISLANDS. 681 


39. Description of a new Lizard from the Canary Islands *. 


By Dr. Pu. Lenrs f. 
[Received May 14, 1914; Read May 19, 1914. | 


LACERTA CHSARIS. 
Abstract P. Z.8. 1914, p. 41 (May 26th). 


Physiognomy and general proportions of Lacerta galloti, but 
much smaller and, from a phyletic point of view, of a more 
primitive pattern of coloration. 

Head rather large, difference in size according to sexes not so 
marked as in Z. galloti and its larger allies. Length of head 
1 of length to vent in the male, very little less in the female. 
‘he cheeks not noticeably swollen in the male. Width of head 
+ of the length, depth 3, width of pileus 4 in both sexes. Snout 
as long as the postocular part of head (to posterior border of 
tympanum) in the female, slightly longer in the male. 

Weck distinctly narrowed. ody slightly flattened. 

Tail long, more than two-thirds total length. 

Limbs elongate, the fore limb im both sexes reaching the 
nostril, the hind limb reaching the collar or not quite so far in 
the female, a little beyond in the male. 

Rostral usually touching the nostril {, separated from the 
frontonasal. 

Frontonasal as long as broad or slightly longer. 

Frontal a little shorter than its distance from the end of the 
snout in the female, but slightly in the male; twice as long as 
broad (on its narrowest point) in the female, slightly longer in 
the male; not touching the first supraocular. 

Supraoculars separated from superciliaries by a series of 
granules. 

Parietals as long as, or slightly longer, rarely shorter § than 
the frontal in the male, usually a little longer in the female, 
strongly bent down on the temple, occupying the place usually 
held by the supratemporals ||. 

Occipital at least as broad as the interparietal, usually con- 
siderably broader, and constantly broader than long; on an 
average larger in the male than in the female 4. 

Asingle postnasal. 5 upper labials anterior to the subocular **. 


* [The complete account of the new species described in this communication 
appears here, but since the name and a preliminary diagnosis were published in the 
‘Abstract,’ No. 134, 1914, the species is distinguished by being underlined.-— 

Eprrox, | 

+ Communicated by Dr. G. A. BounenGErR, F.R.S.. F.Z.S. 

{ Exceptions rare: for instance in Nos. 3 and 14 of the annexed table. 

§ Fer instance in No. 13. 

|| The author does not wish to support the theory of a fusion of the said shields. 
As is generally the rule in the species of Lacerta. 
abe superposed anterior loreals on each side in No. 4, double anterior subocwars 
in No. 12. 


DR. PH. LEHRS ON A NEW LIZARD 


aie SE 


*G.0 $7.9 arvpRd.r0q Ut uIMghog » 


.Q atvpeoraqur umynog | 


ig 


¢ 
. 


6:0 


Ag 


eH Ee Se oa 
= SS Se ei. ec Sy eo iS Total length. 
Ss) SS @ & (eo CG ey ey gs 
Ss ee SS OS SSS 
& Be eee en RS OL Se From end of snout 
rs Gh. Ep ca Ss Se eS to vent. 
= Be a 
= — = = 2 = (Jeo) foo} = ~T on n - 
= Fi co fe © oo S Tail. 
S Gm oR te. oo ee ee aS | 5 
ee € 2 es H 
ny] *, . 
bo RS RS GS RS OS Se SS From end of snout 
oo Se otes LoS er Cel Tes ey tS to fore limb. 
(a ay | en — ey ee) ae) 
Lae gece Senge Gabe mcrae (core ie eok eek (ee) Length of head. 
or On or 
BEEP SP — roe - 
CON RO! SI REAS Oi TES) SES LISS MRO IRS Width of head. 
Or or or 
a TOD 0 ODO DM SD HM Depth of head. 
or Or or or 
= See nye Mae 2 coy ey ieee Ge Width of pileus. 
Or or or or ~I 
ur 
S SBS SES RRS sll Pore limb, 
4 Si Soe Sho Nice onlcon EMTS x & | ‘Hind limb. 
© iS) eo eo. ie cD) OS) eS) Os eo ee Dorsal scales across | 
od Ne CA =e SO OOS ee Ca middle of body. 
fot Cena sine MALES oat aes. 
ae en LoS Se Ss Sa Ss Longitudinal series 
me SA i ae I ty he de a 8 of vertral plates. 
bo bo pK 
is oe © BO © wo © © w | jeecee se series of 
= Fe NG a SON COD (ORO ee [ ventral plates. 
) 1S 0 www " 
bo ba J = = or Or or = 
gs Ub ere STB (a. 2 ONT LO ey nee Width and length 
i pk NT kh AN oT a a | of frontal shield. 
bo bo rm w » bo 5 i 
on oS Or or or ao on | 
= Siete tet ae See 
a ot COR oma Curate ets Width and length 
ge Smee. So eetn y Cees lee of interparietal 
H Fe Fe = Pe FP Fe bw bw a 
x eae eS PN TON eT ar RS) shield. 
or or or Or Ou On * oO Or Or oO | 
‘S Dn tye Ek ww tw we we & | ; 
xn Ch Se SS a oo : 
ie EE Me ey oT el eee Lane ars Width and length 
a Pepe ee Be ob Pw eH wp SD of occipital shield. 
bo Or bo or “I “I ~T bo bf bo 
On Or oO OT oO on oO | 
2 m i © GG 9 MSs iss 8) 1 : 
o bt oo CO oa coe (a) (S) = oO = Gular scales. 
S Ne HERP Gar y eeene. op RN Ea Nee bee Collar plates. 
bo to eg © W fs OS) 
® oo tm tw = & S' S fs 2 & Femoral pores 
= LS ESS eS! 0S) TS Rey Se RS es r] i 
tg iS 2 2 ss Se (right/left). 
Sonata 
2 Y Con TSE Gog CON eke Loe Subdigital lamelle. 


FROM THE CANARY ISLANDS, 683 


Temporal scutellation granular, often finely, with more or less 
developed masseteric and tympanic shields; a series of small 
supr atemporals. 

Scales covering the lower eyelid extremely small and granular, 
those in the centre scarcely, if at all, differentiated. 

Dorsal scales very small, rhombic- granular, more or less dis- 
tinctly keeled, 90-110 across the middle of the body; 3 or 4 
series corresponding to one ventral plate. 

Upper caudal scales much smaller than the dorsals. 

Gular scales 33-44 on a line between the collar and the third 
pair of chin-shields; gular fold distinct, collar not serrated, 
composed of 7-11 plates. 

Ventrals in 10 or 12 longitudinal and 29-31 Ponsvene series. 

Anal comparatively small. 

Femoral pores 24-31. 

Subdigital lamelle 30-36 under the fourth toe. 

Coloration (from life). Pileus of a dark or light bronze-brown, 
more or less profusely speckled with black. 

Superciliary streak, if distinct, on each side running entirely 
upon the parietal and continued to the base of the tail, or 
beyond; this streak of a bright yellow in life. 

A light streak along the spine, well defined from the bronze 
colour of the dorsal region. 

A short subocular streak, of a duller yellow than the super- 
ciliary, and often interrupted, extends a little way beyond the 
tympanum in the middle of the dark brown temporal band, 
which is edged below by a continuous dull yellow streak, extend- 
ing from below the tympanum to the base of the hind limb, 
reappearing again on the side of the tail. 

The dark bands in some specimens (young males) with small 
light, dark-edged spots without any tendency to form transverse 
series. Larger bright spots on the limbs. 

Lower surface of head blackish grey, or even black in full- 
grown specimens; the dark shade sometimes extending to the 
breast. Belly dirty white, or pale greyish, without any spots ; 
a few roundish, ileal white spots sometimes present on the 
margin. 

Frequently a small sky-blue spot on the dark temporal band 
above the insertion of the fore limb, another of the same colour 
on the upper arm. In a few adult females the whole lower 
surfaces of the thighs of the same bright blue. 

In some fully adult males the markings become very indistinct 
or may nearly entirely vanish, such specimens being blackish 
brown. 

Iris silvery. 

Habitat: Hierro, Canary Islands; a large number of speci- 
mens were collected by Dr. Caesar Boettger at Las Lapas, in 
the “ Golfo” of Hierro, and presented to me in August, 1913. 

The types, which I received alive, are preserved in my private 
collection. é 

This species belongs to the same group as the well known 


Proc. Zoou. Soc. 914, No. XLVII. 47 


684 ON A NEW LIZARD FROM THE CANARY ISLANDS. 


L. galloti D. B., from which it differs to the same extent as 
LL. simonyi Steind., from the “ Roques del Zalmore,” near Hierro, 
but in an opposite direction. 
' It differs from JZ. galloti in its smaller size, in its broader 
occipital shield, in the downward extension of the parietal shields, 
in fewer longitudinal rows of ventral shields (10-12, instead of 
12-14), in the higher number of dorsal scales (90-110, instead of 
80-98), in the more primitive pattern of coloration, as well as in 
the feeble degree of secondary sexual differentiation. 

In my opinion it represents the most primitive type of the 
L. galloti group. 


ON THE MECHANISM OF SUCTION IN LYGUS. PABULINUS. 685 


40, The Mechanism of Suction in the Potato Capsid Bug, 
Lygus pabulinus Linn. By P.R. Awart, B.A. (Cantab.), 
D.LC.(Lond.), Sir John Wolfe-Barry Research Scholar, 
Imperial College of Science, London *. 

[ Received January 31, 1914: Read March 17, 1914} 


(Text-figures 1-29.) 


INDEX. Page 
Introduction ..... BA ro ACS DNE ERE HUST IO EUnet RBS Geos ape ETE oF =D 
Material and Method .. PREP Ra Meatainngein en ptt ee eae) ORG. 
Hiomolerencothenviont erat Bopean esa cua cunbondtos68 doc aastas Doon oleH7/ 
Moxpholosyotstheviea dm rieece nesters cetseeenchcckc emcees ore cern Oe 
Tentorium ..... sel Bua edauels cutaiscon sate Aveueaeas son Mer Meaty ia AO 
Muscles of the Head RA ate dean can enero e cae ita) APD 
LEVEN a1ixg 8 For Hse a Ghanseidoeusacoa Da adelaaeetie ee On terlace Cac Roe a see pene eee aA LS) 
Gustatory Cues Sot nice cada care Dap caso BA caamec Doaaeouee EE MCE ERY OT 
PUMIp-ap Parabus ceawes see eee ese tee hs censotem ee encca teens teres CO 
Mechanism pacncnion Bn Renee Suen ee nantaNy eR Re a TA eae aR ees LO 
B31) StOyeRIEY OD) Fae ena neaasuees anu coc aBeNs ode Gee Hes ectdunas ScbaC ee noeseRe omen 732 

INTRODUCTION. 


The investigation of the mechanism of suction in Lygus 
pabulinus arose out of an inquiry by Professor Lefroy, of the 
Imperial College of Science, and Mr. Horne into the production 
by insects, on the foliage of the potato, of symptoms resembling 
those produced by fungi and by bacteria. They had produced 
definite symptoms by the infection of potato foliage with a Capsid 
(Lygus), a Jassid (Hupteryx), and other sucking insects; the 
symptoms were markedly characteristic of the differ ent species ; 
and the investigation of the actual mechanism of suction thus 
became necessary. I took up this inquiry at the suggestion of 
Professor Lefroy, who was in India at the time. 

The insect is common on the potato and other plants during 
the summer. More than one species of Lygus is concerned with 
the damage to the plants. The species used in this investigation 
has been identified by Mr. W. L. Distant at the Natural History 
Museum as Lygus pabulinus Linn. 

The scope of this paper is limited. It does not pretend to 
give full anatomical or morphological descriptions, but it describes 
the different structures of the head, both morphologically and 
anatomically, as far as they appear to be important in the 
mechanism of suction. 

I very gratefully acknowledge my indebtedness to Prof. Lefroy 
for his help and encouragement during the whole of my work, to 
Mr. Clifford Dobell for his valuable criticism and suggestions, and 
to Mr. H. G. Newth for his assistance in preparing the paper for 
press, 

* Communicated by Prof. H. Maxwett Lerroy, M.A., F.Z.S. 


47* 


686 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


MaTEeRIAL AND METHOD. 


I began my work in the Chelsea Physic Gardens of the 
Imperial College of Science, but, since the specimens were scarce, 
I had to go to Wisley, where I got good material through the 
kindness of Mr. F. Chittenden, the Director of the Wisley 
Horticultural Laboratory. 

The following reagents were used for fixing the insects :— 

(i.) Bouin’s solution, 
(ii.) Carnoy solution (Formula No. IJ), 
(iii.) Petrunkevitch solution ; 


and all of these have given satisfactory results. 

The insects were kept in the fixing reagent for 24 hours, and, 
without being passed through the lower grades of alcohol, were 
thrown into 90 per cent. alcohol, in which they were allowed to 
remain for several weeks. Thus treated, they were sufficiently 
hardened for section-cutting, and it was, therefore, not necessary 
to keep them in absolute alcohol for more than three hours. After 
immersion for. one hour in a mixture of equal parts of absolute 
alcohol and chloroform, they were transferred to pure chloroform, 
in which they were left for 24 to 36 hours. They were now 
imbedded in paraftin-wax (melting-point 56° C.) in the following 
way :—A saturated chloroform solution (in the cold) of wax of 
the same melting-point was prepared and the specimens were 
allowed to lie in it for two or three days at the temperature of 
the laboratory. They were then transferred to pure molten wax 
in the oven, where they remained for five hours. A block was 
then prepared in the usual way. 

The importance of attention to the details of the above routine 
cannot be overrated. There is in the literature, so far as I can 
find, no single detailed description of a method by which good 
sections of hard insects can be got, and it is notoriously difficult 
to find any but diagrammatic illustrations to the papers of those 
who have investigated such forms. As the result, however, of 
my experiments, | have found that it is possible to obtain series 
of excellent sections, not only of Zygus, but of such hard and 
thickly-chitinised insects as the bed-bug, without using any 
reagent for softening the chitin. I am therefore justified in 
giving some prominence to the technique. 

Long soaking in a mixture of chloroform and wax was found 
to be the only way to obtain proper impregnation, and the time 
given is the optimum—a shorter time is insufficient, a longer 
causes the tissues to become brittle. The length of the soaking 
differs with different imsects, according to the quality of their 
chitin. 

The sections were stained, in the ordinary way, with Ehrlich 
hematoxylin, orange G, and picric acid (saturated solution in 
90 per cent. alcohol). 

For macerating purposes, potash (10 per cent.) was used. A 
few drops of acetic acid were found useful. The specimens were 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 687 


generally cleared in turpineol, which did not make them brittle, 
even if they were kept in it for a long time. 


HoMo.LoGigEs oF THE MoutH-PArts oF RHYNCHOTA. 


The problem of the true homologies is very difficult, and has 
only recently been solved. In this section I propose to give a 
summary of the literature dealing with this problem. 

Fabricius gave the name “ Rhynchota” to the insects comprised 
in the class “‘ Hemiptera,” on account of their sucking mouth- 
parts. But till the time of Savigny (42), no attempt was made 
to homologise their mouth-parts with those of other (biting) 
insects. He hit upon the interpretation which is now generally 
accepted, According to him, the mouth-parts of the Rhynchota 
are homologous with those of the biting insects; the maxille, 
the mandibles, and the labium being represented in these forms 
by the internal stylets, the external stylets, and the proboscis, 
respectively. His interpretation has been endorsed by Kirby 
and Spence, Burmeister, and lately by Heymons and Leon. 

Savigny and Cuvier, one with Wepa cinerea, and the other 
with Ranatra linearis, had found the labial palps articulated to 
the proboscis. But they could not discover any trace of the 
maxillary palps, which are well-developed structures in the biting 
insects. They had not, therefore, good evidence for the homologies 
of the maxille. 

These matters will be better elucidated if the history of the 
homologies of each part be treated separately. 


The Proboscis, or Schnabelscheide. 


There were two views with regard to the structure of the 
proboscis before 1880 :— 


(i.) Burmeister (5), Latreille, and Graber held that the proboscis 
was formed by the second maxille fusing together with the labial 
palps. Burmeister has stated this view in very general and 
vague terms, but it was Kraepelin (25, 26) who elaborated it in 
detail. According to him the first segment of the proboscis 
corresponds to the submentum and mentum together, and the 
three segments, 2, 3, 4, to the three segments of the labial palps 
of the biting insects. This view had been supported by the fact 
that there were, on the second joint of the proboscis, certain 
strong chitinous tubercles which were supposed by him to be 
the rudiments of the organs, 7. e. extremities of external and 
internal lobes of the palps. Leon (30), however, takes them 
to be the -chitinous supports for the muscles of the proboscis, 
running into the head. 

This view has been exploded, and no present-day writers think 
seriously of it, its interest being now purely historical. 

(ii.) The second view was first formulated by Savigny and 
Cuvier, and is now generally accepted. Savigny, in Vepa cinerea, 
and Cuvier, in Ranatra linearis, discovered certain jointed 


688 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


structures articulated to the proboscis, which they took to be 
the labial palps. The palps are, therefore, in this view, separate 
from the proboscis, and do not take any part in its formation, 
the proboscis being formed by the fusion of the second maxille 
only. 

After Savigny comes Gerstfeldt (14). He elaborated this 
view as Kraepelin had done the earlier one. According to him: 

‘‘ Das erste Glied das nach Burmeister allein die Unterlippe 
darstellt, wire an das submentum und entsprache den Cardines 
der Lippenkiefer, das zweite Glied bestande aus den beiden 
Stipites und wire analog dem Mentum, das dritte und vierte 
Glieder gehérten zusammen den Endlappen der Unterlippe an und 
entsprachen entweder nur den ausseren Laden (Paraglossx) oder 
nur den unteren Laden (Ligulz), oder aber, was mir noch wahr- 
scheinlicher ist, beiden mit einander vereinigten Ladenpaaren 
zugleich.” 

Leon (29-33) has fully dealt with the question of the homo- 
logies of the proboscis. His examples are taken from the 
Belostomide. He clearly demonstrated the presence of the labial 
palps as distinct from the proboscis, and came to the following 
conclusion, after examining all the examples : 

“Hs ist ganz gleichgiiltig, in welcher Weise die Glieder der 
Scheide von einer Art zur andern, sei es als Form, Grosse, als 
Borstenanzahl, als Chitinerhebungen, etc. variieren mochten, eins 
bleibt immer constant, das die Scheide aus derselben Zahl von 
Gliedern besteht, die immer dieselbe Stellung zu einander haben 
und die vollkommen homolog sind den Bildungsgliedern des 
Labiums der beissenden Insecten.” 

In the meantime, Dr. R. Heymons (18) had published the 
result of his study of the development of certain rhynchotous 
forms. His conclusions are:—(1) the labial palps have entirely 
disappeared in the adult Rhynchota; (2) the so-called labial 
palps are secondary structures from the third segment of the 
proboscis ; they appear in the embryo but they degenerate and 
disappear in the later stages. Leon, however, does not agree 
with these conclusions. Heymons has deduced them from the 
study of the comparative embryology of these forms; while Leon 
has come to his different conclusions from the study of their — 
comparative anatomy. His conclusions are :—(1) The labial palps 
persist in the adult forms; (2) they have been discovered in 
Nepa, Ranatra, and certain Belostomide ; (3) it is not possible 
for any secondary structures to originate at the same place where 
the primary structures had been before, and to perform the same 
function as the latter. 

While the homologies of the labium were being discussed in 
Europe, a novel interpretation of the same structures was 
put forward in America by Prof. J. B. Smith (45), who had 
brought his special knowledge of the mouth-parts of Diptera to 
bear upon this question. He held that the proboscis was a part 
of the first maxille; the basal segment of the proboscis being the 
cardo ; the second, subgalea; the third and the fourth, the two 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 689 


segments of the galea. <All that remained of the labium was the 
mentum—a boat-shaped process lying between the stylets. This 
was an original view, confined to Smith alone. It was shown, 
the next year, to be erroneous by Marlatt (34), and, after a few 
years, by Meek (36), according to whom the boat-shaped process— 
the mentum of Smith—was the pharynx. 

Thus far no one has definitely demonstrated the presence or 
absence of the labial palps. All the recent writers are unani- 
mous in the view that the proboscis is formed by the fusion of 
the second maxille, which consist of the submentum, mentum, 
paraglosse, and ligule—the view held by Gerstfeldt long ago. 
But here unanimity ends, and different views prevail as to the 
existence of the labial palps. 

(i.) Leon holds that they are present in the adult forms. He 
deals with this question from the anatomical standpoint. 

(ii.) Heymons holds that the labial palps appear only in the 
embryonic stages, and disappear in the adult forms. He writes: 
“Wenn einigen Autoren auch gewisse Anhange an der Unter- 
lippe, also Palpi labiales angesprochen worden sind, so wird man 
sich diese Deutungen gegeniiber skeptisch verhalten miissen, da 
weder die Entwickelungsgeschichte, noch die vergleichende 
Anatomie zu Gunsten solecher Ausnahmen sprechen.” 


Maxille, or inner Borstenkiefer, or Stechborsten. 


Savigny long ago, and others who have followed him, have 
homologised the inner stylets of the Rhynchota with the first 
maxille of the biting insects. But they have not clearly shown 
what parts correspond to cardo, stipes, etc., and what becomes 
of the maxillary palps—which are conspicuously absent in the 
Hemiptera. 

Kraepelin (25) held that the grooved inner stylets were 
mandibles, which formed the tube for suction, while the maxille 
were on the outside of the mandibles. This view is not now 
accepted. 

Huxley (48) denied the homologies of the inner stylets with 
the first maxille of the other (biting) insects, because the former 
do not happen to possess the maxillary palps of the latter. 

Mecznikow (49) has also denied the homologies of the internal 
and the external stylets in the Homoptera. According to 
him the true maxille and mandibles appear in the embryonic 
stages only, but they degenerate and disappear later on. Both 
stylets of the adults are produced from the retort-shaped 
(‘‘retortenformigen”) organs situated in the head. They are 
therefore not homologous with the maxille and the mandibles of 
the biting insects. 

Witlaczil (50) has demonstrated, however, that the embryonic 
mandibles and maxille do not disappear at all, but persist in 
the adult stages, though there is a marked change in their 
position. In early stages they are situated on the outside, but 
later on they sink into the head and become entirely internal. 


690 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


This sinking in, or involution, of these structures has been 
brought about by the greater development (overgrowth) of the 
clypeus and the labrum. The retort-shaped organs are nothing 
but the swollen bases of these stylets. Not only are these organs 
found in the Homoptera but they are also found in the Hetero- 
ptera; though in the latter they are not so prominent as in 
the former, owing to their degeneration. In the Homoptera 
they have been recently demonstrated by Davidson (9). 

The fact that both the stylets sink into the head owing to the 
overgrowth of the clypeus, has been recently shown by Heymons. 

The mandibles and the maxille, then, do not disappear but 
persist in the later stages, though in different positions. ‘‘ Man- 
diblen und Maxillenladen ziehen sich bei den Rhynchoten 
in tiefe taschenformigen Hohlungen zuruck und scheiden die 
chitinosen Stechborsten aus.” Thus writes Heymons. The 
retort-shaped organs of Mecznikow, in the Homoptera, are the 
‘‘taschenformigen Hohlungen” of Heymons, in the Hemiptera in 
general. 

Prof. J. B. Smith (45) was the first to call attention to the 
fact that the maxillary stylets form but a part of the first maxille. 
Each maxilla consists of two parts: the maxillary sclerite or 
segment, and the maxillary stylet; but he was not able to 
identify them separately. 

It was not until Heymons had published his “ Beitrige zur 
Morphologie und Entwickelungsgeschichte der Rhynchoten” (20), 
that the relation between the maxillary segment or plate and 
the maxillary stylet was clearly understood. According to Smith 
the two pairs of stylets with the lateral (maxillary) sclerites 
posterior to the mandibles, together with the proboscis, represent 
the first maxille ; the stylets representing the lacinia and stipes ; 
the sclerite representing the palpus and the proboscis. He had 
made both the stylets arise from the same place. He is apparently 
led astray in his interpretation by a faulty dissection, which was 
shown to be the case by Marlatt (34). 

Heymons is the first writer to explain clearly the homologies 
of the first maxille. He has studied their development in certain 
Hemipterous (both Heteropterousand Homopterous) forms. He 
has clearly demonstrated that a maxilla arises as a single structure, 
but that soon after it is divided into two parts :—(i.) a median 
piece, or maxillenlade; (ii.) a lateral piece, maxillenhécker, or 
maxillary plate (segment). 

(i.) Lhe maaxillenlade.—This becomes elongated and transformed 
into a long tapering stylet, two of which (one from either side) 
combine together to form two tubes, one for suction of the sap, 
and the other for ejection of the saliva. 

(ii.) The maxillary plate—This represents the stem of the 
maxilla (cardo and stipes) of the biting insects. It forms the 
antero-lateral piece of the head-wall, and has therefore nothing 
to do with the mouth-parts proper—except in so far as it forms 
the support to the protractor muscles of the maxille. 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 691 


The Maxillary Palps. 


The presence of maxillary palps is one of the distinguishing 
features of the first maxille of the biting insects, but they 
have completely disappeared in the Rhynchota. The maxille 
become elongated in these insects, and work inside plant or 
animal tissues. Sensory apparatus in the form of palps is 
superfluous. 

Maxillary palps had been described long ago by Ratzeburg 
(1827-34) in certain species. Hach palp was found to be three- 
jointed. Burmeister (1835) had, however, found that they were 
not palps but horny tubercles marking the attachment of the 
maxillary muscles. 

Heymons has, as far as possible, elucidated the question of the 
maxillary palps. According to Smith, the maxillary sclerite and 
the palps fused together to form one structure. Heymons, 
however, holds another view. The maxillary palp is distinct 
from the sclerite, and the maxillary plate has a process (processus 
maxillaris) which he interprets to be the remains of a maxillary 
palp. In some species of Tingide there are certain processes— 
which were taken to represent the labial palps—but which are 
now regarded as the maxillary palps. 

Rudimentary palps are present in some Hydrocoridee—in 
Nepa they are onion-shaped—but in Gymnocerata they are 
identified with the Bucculz (?). 


Mandibles, or external Stechborsten. 


These were recognised as such long ago, though Kraepelin (25) 
had mistaken them for the maxille, and had therefore made 
them the sucking organs. The views of Mecznikow have been 
given above. Prof. Smith, while working on the nymph of 
Cicada, described a mandibular sclerite corresponding to that of 
the maxilla, and a mandibular stylet also corresponding to the 
maxillary. Heymons, too, has described the mandibular sclerite 
(lamina mandibularis) and stylet in Cicada. The mandibular 
sclerite is very well marked in the Homoptera, but in the 
Heteroptera it is not present at all, or is rudimentary. These 
structures are distinct in the later stages, though they have been 
derived from the same structure in the embryo; the connection 
between them is lost. The protractors of the mandibular stylets 
are not attached to the mandibles but to their levers at one 
end and, at the other, to the mandibular sclerite. 

This interpretation of Heymons has been recently called in 
question by Muir and Kershaw (22, 23, 24). The so-called 
mandibular plates are not derived, according to them, from 
the mandibles, and therefore have no relation whatever to 
them. They are mandibular folds or sulci. 

The most recent view therefore is :—(i.) The mandibles of the 
biting insects are represented by the external stylets. (i1.) The 
mandibles are not divided into two parts, one corresponding to the 


692 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


cardo and stipes of the maxille and the other to the maxillary 
stylet. (iii.) The protractor muscles of the mandibles are attached 
to the levers and not to the mandibles. 


Labrum. 


This is the least disputed structure. Its homology with the 
labrum of the mandibulate insects has been determined with 
certainty. It is not, however, one of the appendages of the head 
but a continuation of the clypeal sclerite, from which it is not 
easily to be distinguished externally. 


Tue Morro tocy or tHE Heap. (Text-fig. 1.) 


The head of Lygus pabulinus consists of the following parts :— 

(1) The Epicraniwm.—tThis lies between the two large eyes. 
It is continued into 

(2) The Clypeus. (The frons, the intermediate portion between 


Text-figure 1. 


Lygus pabulinus. 


Mount of the whole head, macerated in potash (10 per cent.), and stained with 
saturated picric in 90 per cent. alcohol; showing the internal chitinous 
structures. Ob. 3 & Oc. 4. 

The lines numbered 2, 4, 5 indicate the planes of the longitudinal sections 
shown in the corresponding figures. 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 


695 


epicranium and clypeus, is not well marked.) The sides of the 
clypeus have sunk into the head, forming clypeal folds to which 
the protractors of the mandibles are attached, and which are 
fused with the ventral wall of the pharynx (text-fig. 17, Clp.F.). 
(8) The Labrum.—tThis is merely a continuation of the clypeus, 
and there is no sign of external differentiation between the two 


structures. 


It extends as far as the first segment of the labium, 
and tapers to a point, the base being broader. 


It has rather a 


deep groove underneath to hold the stylets in place, since the 
labial groove at this point is too shallow and flat to do this. 
There are three external longitudinal ridges on its dorsal surface ; 
its sides are ornamented with small rounded lobes, and its surface 


Explanation of Lettering. 


. Antagonistic Muscles. 
. Afferent Salivary Duct. 
. Anterior Wall of the Pump- 


chamber. 


- Buccal Fold. 
. Cambium. 
. Circumesophageal Com- 


missure. 


p. Clypeo-labrum. 

». Clypeo-labrum. 

. Clypeal Fold. 

. Clypeal Sclerite. 

. Constrictor Muscles. 

. Cortex. 

. Cribriform Plate. 

. Cardiac Valve. 

. Dorsal Arms of the Ten- 


torium. 


. Divaricator Muscles. 
. Ejection Canal. 
. Epicranium. 


Epidermis. 


. Epipharynx. 

. Endodermis. 

. Efferent Salivary Duct. 

», Gustatory Organs. 

. Hypopharynx. 

. Lumen of the A.S.D. 

. Labium. 

. Labial Groove. 

. Labial Muscles. 

r, Labrum. 

. Ligament for A.M. 

. Ligament for D.M. 

. Ligament for P.M. 

. Mandibles. 

. Mandibular Articulation. 
. Mandibular Lever. 

. Protractors of the Man- 


dibles. 


. Retractors of the Man- 


dibles. 


. Cavity of the Mandibles. 
. Hooks of the Mandibles. 
. Mandibular Sheath. 

. Mouth of the A.S.D. 


| 


Mx.C. 
Mx.F. 
Mx.L. 
Mx.P. 
Mx.R. 
Mx.Md. Art. 


Mx.Md.M. 


Cavity of the Maxillary 
Stylet. 

Maxillary Fold. 

Maxillary Lever. 

Protractors of the Maxillary 
Stylets. 

Retractors of the Maxillary 
Stylets. 

Maxillo - mandibular Arti- 
culation. 

Maxsillo - mandibular 
Muscles. 


Sc. Maxillary Sclerite. 

. Maxillary Sheaths. 

. Maxillary Stylets. 

. Operculum. 

. (sophagus. 

. Posterior Arms of the 


Tentorium. 


y. Pump-cylinder. 

. Pump-chamber. 

. Piston. 

. Handle of the Piston. 
. Pharyngeal Duct. 

. Pharynx proper. 

. Phloem. 

. Pump Muscles. 

. Retort-shaped Organs. 
. Pump-stem. 

. Posterior 


Wall of the 


Pump-chamber. 


. Maxillary Process or Sup- 


porting Strut. 


. Suction Canal. 
. Supra - esophageal Gang- 


lion. 


. Sub-cesophageal Ganglion. 
. Salivary Duct. 

. Body of the Tentorium. 

. Trachea. 

<. Tip of the Maxillary Stylet. 
. Tip of the Mandible. 

. “V” or ventral wall of the 


Pharynx. 


. Valvular muscles. 
. Xylem. 


694 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


is covered dorsally with small hairs or papillz, and is very smooth 
ventrally. It is complementary in its function to the labium, 
i. €. it is applied closely against the labium to form the deep 
groove which keeps the stylets in place and prevents their lateral 
movement (text-fig. 9, Lbr.). 

(4) The Maxillary Sclerite—This is situated laterally to the 
epicranium just below the eyes, and forms the lateral boundary 
of the mouth. As stated above, it is one of the parts of the em- 
bryonic maxilla. The protractors of the maxille areattached to it. 

(5) The Labiwm (text-figs. 1, 29, Lb.).—This structure consists 
of four segments. The first is broader and shorter and has 
practically no groove, or, if there is any, it is very shallow and 
flat. The first joint—i. e. the joint between the first and second 
segments—is swollen, and this swelling is due to a great develop- 
ment of chitinous ‘‘tendons” to which the labial muscles are 


Text-figure 2, 


7 (615 14:13 
21 Ch. V. Mee wae Ay keSies 


Nerve 
to G Gre 


Ph. 

V. Ph. 

Op. 

Chitinous rods 
in muscles 


Many, 


LUT 


MUN 


Mh 
UD 


ACT 
Wo 


“il 
LUT 


Gs. CV. Sub.G. 


Lygus pabulinus. 
Diagrammatic median longitudinal section. Ob. 3 & Oc. 4. 


The lines numbered 9 to 22 indicate the levels of the sections shown in the 
corresponding figures, 
N.B.—In all the sections the microscope tube is not drawn out to its 
proper length. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 695 


attached (text-figs. 2, 16, Lb.M.). Moreover, it acts as a hinge 
upon which the whole of the labium is bent and doubled. This 
is one of the characteristic features of the insect. In enables 
the insect to get at the required tissues of a plant. The stylets 
are thrust into tissues containing food, the depth of which below 
the surface varies in different parts of the same plant. The 
deeper such tissue lies, the greater is the bend of the labium at 
the first joint. Its bend is scarcely appreciable when the insect 
is sucking sap from tissues which are superficial. 

The stylets cannot be increased in length, but this mechanism 
by shortening the proboscis enables the insect artificially to 
protrude them further into the plant tissue. The labial muscles 
facilitate this bending (text-figs. 2, 16, Lb.M.). 


Text-figure 3. 


Pump-apparatus of Lygus pabulinus. 
Sagittal section. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


The second, the third, and the fourth segments are long and 
narrow and gradually taper to a point. The groove, which is 
shallow and flat in the first segment, begins to deepen in the 


696 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


second, and, in the last segment, forms a tube enclosing the 
stylets.. Cross-sections of the last segment show one tube within 
the other. The inner tube enclosing the stylets is formed by the 
groove; and the labium is the outer tube which encloses the 
former (text-fig. 8, Lb.G.). 

The. tip of the labium is encircled with bristles which are of 
two sorts, fine and stiff. They are arranged in a definite way, 
and function as sensory hairs. The insect feels the surface of a 
leaf with them before thrusting its stylets into it. 

The labrum and the labium together keep the stylets in place. 
In the first segment, where the labial groove is too flat and 
shallow to do it and where the labium hasa bend inwards, thereby 
leaving the stylets free, the labrum encloses them in its groove. 
Distally the labium takes over this function of holding the 
stylets, since its groove becomes deeper and deeper, Thus the 
stylets are always found in the groove of one or the other, and 
are prevented from that lateral movement which would make 
piercing and sucking impossible. 

The labium protects the stylets in the groove, but its more 
important function is very ingenious. The stylets are very thin, 
needle-like structures which have, however, to pierce the tough 
and cuticularised epidermis of a leaf. As they are very delicate, 
they would bend in the act of piercing, were they not enclosed in 
the proboscis. The lumen of the tubular tip of the proboscis is 
so small that the stylets fit into it tightly (text-fig. 8). There 
is no empty space in it for them to bend. The tip of the labium 
is closely applied to the surface of the leaf; the protractor 
muscles of the stylets contract; and the stylets are forced out 
of the proboscis and driven against the epidermis, which they 
cannot fail to pierce. Once in, their forward progress to the 
required tissue is mechanical owing to the bend of the labium 
at the first joint. 

It is thus obvious that the labium is an important structure in 
the sucking apparatus of this insect ; it is one, moreover, on the 
structure of which stress has not been laid by previous writers. 


(6) The Stylets, or Stechborsten. (Text-figs. 1, 6, 23.) 
(1) MorpHonoey. 


(¢) The Maxillary Stylets or Internal Stechborsten. (Text- 

figs. 1, 5, 6, 23, Mx.St.) 

It is shown above that the stylet is a part of the maxilla and 
not the maxilla itself, Each maxilla is divided, in the embryonic 
stage, into two parts, one of which forms the stylet or Stechborste. 
The maxillary stylets are situated between the pharynx and the 
mandibles on either side. They are not, however, on the same 
level with either of them: they are just above the pharynx and 
below the mandibles. They are hollow, and their cavities are 
continuous with the body-cavity. 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. - 697 


Each of them consists ons 


(i.) an external part, projecting beyond ite head and forming 
the complementary half of the sucking tube ; 

(ii.) an internal part, separate from its complemént and going 
to one side of the pharynx. 


(i.) The external part. This tapers to a fine and curved point. 
In cross-sections it shows a groove which is divided into two 
gutters by a longitudinal ridge which runs through it, from end 
to end. In short, the whole structure looks in cross-section like 
a W, and one groove is thus divided into two small, separate, and 
non-intercommunicating groovelets. The two stylets from either 
side come together and by approximation of these groovelets form 
two complete tubes—one dorsal facing the labrum and functioning 


Text-figure 4. 


D.A. 


Lygus pabulinus. 


Nearly median longitudinal section, showing the supporting structure, the body 
of the tentorium, the pump muscles, ete. Ob. 3 & Oc. 4. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


698 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


as the suction-canal, and one ventral facing the labium, func- 
tioning as the ejection-canal, through which saliva is forced down 
by the salivary pump (text-figs. 8, 9, 10, Mx.8t., Su.C., E.C.). 

There are not any extra-chitinous structures to unite the two 
stylets to form the canals; the three ridges of each stylet 
apparently uniting with those of the other. They can be detached 
from one another with a little force. This fusion may easily be 
seen in a series of cross-sections. 


Text-figure 5. 


Lygus pabulinus. 


Lateral longitudinal section, showing the arrangement of the muscles 
in the head. Ob. 3 & Oc. 4. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


The tips of the stylets are smooth and lancet-shaped, as might 
be expected from their function (text-fig. 23). In certain aquatic 
forms they are ornamented with minute incurved hooks (0. 
Geisse (18). Within the plant-tissues the tips of the maxille do 
not end simultaneously ; one of them is pushed a little further 
than the other (text-fig. 25). 

(ii.) The internal part. This lies within the head. It gets 
gradually flatter and broader when it is traced back. Hach stylet 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 699 


ends internally in a swollen base. These swollen bases, which 
are oval, have their importance in history, which has been referred 
to above. They are known as the retort-shaped organs of 
Mecznikow, or the Taschen-formigen organs of Heymons (text- 
figs. 5, 6, 20, 21, Poc.Or.). 


Text-figure 6. 


Lygus pabulinus. 


Reconstructed from numerous vertical sections, showing the relation of the 
muscles to the stylets, the pump, etc. Ob. 3 & Oc. 4. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


There is no trace of the maxillary groove upon the swollen 
bases, but it begins a little below. The structure of the groove is 
the same here as described in the external part, though on a 
minute scale. The stylets are, of course, separate in the head, as 
they pass one on either side of the pharynx (text-figs. 1, 5, 6, 
11-19). 

Proc. Zoot. Soc.—1914, No. XLVIII. 48 


700 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


(6) The Mandibles. (Text-figs. 1, 5, 6, 23, Md.) 


These are single structures from the beginning. ‘The embryonic 
mandibles are the adult mandibles, there being no mandibular 
sclerite. The present view of their homologies has been given 
above. 

Their external structure corresponds with that of the maxille. 
They lie just above them and do not go so deep into the head. 


Text-figure 7. 


Lygus pabulinus. 


Reconstructed from numerous vertical sections, showing the relation of the 
muscles to the stylets, the pump, ete. Ob. 3 & Oc. 3. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 701 


They are flat and hollow and end in retort-shaped organs like 
the maxillary stylets; but unlike them :— 

(i.) They never form tubes, as they do not unite and have no 
grooves on them. They are separate from end to end. Each of 


Text-figure 8. 


>_. _\ 5a 


Lygus pabulinus. 
Transverse section of the tip of the labium. Immersion-lens & Oc. 4. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


Text-figure 9. 


Lygus pabulinus. 


Transverse section of the tip of the labium, showing the labrum and the labium 
enclosing the stylets. Immersion & Oc. 4. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


49* 


MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


Text-figure 10. 


Lygus pabulinus. 


A & B. Transverse sections, showing the epipharynx, gustatory organs, the 
pharyngeal duct, the efferent salivary duct, etc. Ob. 6 & Oc. 4. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 703 


them is connected with the maxilla of its side by an interlocking 
arrangement. 

(ii.) The tips, which are pointed, are ornamented with recurved 
hooks, the number and size of which seem to vary in different 
species. The number varies from 7 to 9 in L. pabulinus. They 
are bigger towards the tips of the mandibles but get reduced 
posteriorly. The hooks will tear the tissues when withdrawn 
from them with the maxillary stylets, though this arrangement 
will not prevent their entrance into tissues. Their function will 
be clear later on (text-fig. 23, T.Md.). 


(II.) Anatomy. 


The stylets are chitinous, the chitin being lined by the chitino- 
genous epithelium which forms a continuous layer under it. 
Kach of the stylets is enclosed in a sheath which is continuous 
with the integument of the head. This shows that both stylets 
have been invaginated in the course of their development, as is 
demonstrated by Heymons (text-figs. 4-7, Mx.Sh., Md.). 

The retort-shaped organs. (Text-figs. 5, 6, 20, 21, Poc.Or.).— 
These are characteristic of the Rhynchota (Heteroptera and 
Homoptera). Mecznikow (49) has described them as the structures 


Text-figure 11. 


, Lygus pabulinus. 
Transverse section, showing thickening of the floor of the pharyngeal duct 
(cf. figs. 10 A and 12). 
For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


from which the new maxille and the mandibles are formed, but, 
as is shown above, they are not new structures at all. They are 
nothing, in fact, but the swollen bases of the stylets, the swelling 
being formed during development. They are the same as the 
Taschen-formigen structures of Heymons. 

They are oval and curved laterally outward. They are found 


704 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


in the middle part of the head and show a curious structure in 
cross-sections, appearing as areas of glandular tissue surrounded 
by a chitinous ring which disappears in more distal sections. 

The Interlocking Arrangement of the Stylets (external and 
internal). (Vext-figs. 8-16, Mx.Md.Art., Md.Art.).—As shown 
by Davidson (9), the maxille and the mandibles of Schizo- 
neura lanigera are round and lie loose from each other. In 
Lygus pabulinus, however, they are never separate outside the 
head, but are interlocked. Within the head the members of both 
pairs lie loose; the maxillee and the mandibles being smooth and 
oblong without any processes (text-figs. 18-20, Md., Mx.St.). 
Anteriorly in the labral region, they have a different structure. 
The mandibles give rise dorsally to longitudinal ridges (which in 
section appear as knobbed processes), which attach them to the 
labrum or epipharynx. These disappear, however, beyond the 
labrum. This arrangement demonstrates the importance of the 
labrum in keeping the stylets in place and preventing their lateral 
sliding. 

The maxille also have small processes, of a similar nature and 
function, which attach them firmly to the mandibles. These 
structures are clearly visible in cross-sections. In the fourth 
segment of the Jabium they are more pronounced. 


It is obvious, therefore, that the mandibles and maxille are 
inseparably attached to one another, and, the space between them 
being exceedingly small, friction will ensure their simultaneously 
working up and down; the mandibles accompanying the maxille 
all the time and all the way in and out of the plant-tissues, unless 
a differential force be applied *. Inside the head they are always 
prevented from lateral movement by structures which are in- 
vaginations or infoldings of the outer walls of the head, and 
which enclose them successively at different levels. 

These folds are formed by :— 


(i.) The hypopharynx. (Text-figs. 15-15, Hyp.) 
(ii.) The buccal fold. (Text-figs. 16-19, Bu.F.) 
(iii.) The labial fold or the maxillary fold, formed by the 


infolding of the maxillary sclerite. (Text-figs. 16-19, 
Mx.F.) 


These are very prominent structures in cross-sections of the 
head. They are not, however, found in the heads of those forms 
which require lateral movements of their mouth-parts, 7. e., in the 
biting insects. 


Tuer TENTORIUM OR ENDOSKELETON. 


(Text-figs. 1, 4, 6, 7,17, 19-22.) 


This has already been described by various writers: Burmeister, 
Wedde, Léon, Bugnion, ete. Its description by Comstock and 


* The existence of such a force will be demonstrated later on. 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 705 


Text-figures 12 and 13. 


Lygus pabulinus. 


6 2AO ex: Se 


ee SG 
ee 


Text-fig. 12.—Transverse section, showing the maxillo-mandibular articulation, the 
mandibular articulation, the pump-chamber, the pump-stem, etc. Ob. 6 & Oc. 4. 


6.St. 


PSE. 


Text-fig. 13.—Transverse section, showing the maxillo-mandibular articulation, the 
mandibular articulation, the pump-chamber, the pump-stem, etc. Ob. 6 & Oc. 4. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


Text-figures 14 and 15. 
Lygus pabulinus. 


Clp. Lbr. 


Lig. 


Md. Art. 


Mx. Md. Art. 
Mel Mr St 
Ma.C. Md. 
P St. Ee 
Bu.F. S. SE. 
PCA. 
PCy. 
FAG “y: 
A.S.D, 


Text-fig. 14.—Transverse section, showing the maxillo-mandibular articulation, the 
mandibular articulation, the pump-chamber, the pump-stem, etc. Ob. 6 & Oc. 4. 


Text-fig. 15.—Transverse section, showing the piston, the afferent salivary duct, the 
divaricators, the protractors of the stylets, the labial muscle, ete. Ob. 6 & Oc. 4. 
For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


ON THE MECHANISM OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 707 


Kocchi (6) has the special advantage of a simple terminology, 
which I have accordingly adopted here. 


Text-figure 16. 


Lygus pabulinus. 


Transverse section, showing the piston, the afferent salivary duct, the divaricators, 
the protractors of the stylets, the labial muscle, ete. Ob. 3 & Oc. 4. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


The endoskeleton of Lygus pabulinaus consists of hollow chitinous 
rods which are covered by a thin hypodermal (chitinogenous) 
layer. They are nothing but involutions of the chitin of the 
head, and therefore are called “ Apodemes.” The fact that the 
tentorium consists of these hollow structures is very significant. 


708 MR, P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


Great stresses have to be borne, and economy of skeletal material 
has been effected and a maximum of rigidity attained, by forming 
this material into hollow tubes instead of into solid rods. Many 
parallel cases may be instanced from the plant kingdom—of 
hollow stems which resist great stress. 


Text-figure 17. 


Lygus pabulinus. 
Transverse section, showing the clypeal folds, salivary ducts. Ob. 2 & Oc. 12. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


The tentorium consists of the following parts :— 


(I.) The Body of the Tentorium, or Tentorium proper. (Text- 

es. A. 7, 9) es) 

This is formed by the fusion of the different arms of the endo- 
skeleton. It lies between the pump below and the pharynx 
above. It is found at the place where, if it were absent, there 
would be great probability of the pharynx on the one hand and 
the pump on the other, being dragged out of their positions 
by contractions of their powerful muscles. It furnishes a firm 
support for both these organs. 

Its structure is interesting ; both its surfaces (dorsal toward the 
pharynx, and ventral facing the pump) are curved and form two 
grooves. The groove facing the pharynx is V-shaped and corre- 
sponds exactly to the shape of the ventral wall of the pharynx, 
which fits closely into it. They are joined together by con- 
nective tissue. 

The shape of the other groove, 7.e. the ventral one, is roughly 
semicircular, and into it the pump is wedged, and kept there by 
connective tissue. 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 709 


Text-figure 18. 


Ph, 


Md Art. 
-— Mx. F. 

V. PA 
Md. & Ma... 


Mx. St. & 
Mx.C: 


Lygus pabulinus. 


Part of a transverse section, showing the stylets magnified, and their 
arrangement. Ob. 3 & Oc. 12. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 

(II.) The Dorsal Arms. (Text-figs. 4, 17, 18, D.A.) 

These are short and do not reach the walls of the head but lie 
free within it. The sides of the V (.e., the ventral wall of the 
pharynx) are firmly attached to these arms by connective tissue. 

(IIL.) The Posterior Arms. (ext-figs. 1, 4, 5, 7, 20-22, P.A.) 


These are more important than the dorsal arms. They run 


Text-figure 19. 


Lygus pabulinus. 


Transverse section, showing the mandibular levers, stylets magnified, and 
their arrangement. Ob. 8 & Oc. 12. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


710 MR. P, R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


posteriorly from the tentorial body to the posterior wall of the 
head. They are broad, elongate, and flattened dorso-ventrally. 
The pharynx is supported by them (text-fig. 20) just behind the 
tentorial body, their connection with the pharynx being through 
connective tissue. 

At the far end, towards the wall of the head, the arms begin to 
bifurcate, one armlet going straight to the posterior wall and the 
other to the side of the head (text-fig. 5). 

Their functions are very important in the mechanism of 
suction :— 


(i.) They support the pharynx at the place where there is great 
tension. 
(ii.) The pump muscles are attached to them ventrally. 
(iu1.) The valvular muscles find support in them. 
(iv.) The maxillary levers are supported by them. 


Tt will be seen that the pharynx has support on all sides, 7. ¢. 
ventrally, laterally, and dorsally (see below). 


(IV.) The Levers. (Text-figs. 1,5, 6,19, 20, Mx.L., Md.L.) 
Besides the tentorium proper, there are other chitinous struc- 
tures which are connected to the outer and inner stylets. They 


Text-figure 20. 


Lygus pabulinus. 


Transverse section, showing the antagonistic muscles, the retort-shaped organs, 
the posterior arms of the tentorium, etc. Ob. 3 & Oc. 12. 
For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


are known as the mandibular and the maxillary levers, and are 
placed at right angles to the direction of the stylets. 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS., ul 


(A) The Mandibular Levers. (Text-fig. 19, Md.L.) 


These are attached proximally to the lateral wall, or maxillary 
sclerite, just below the bases of the antenne, and distally to the 
mandibles through a igament. Their distal connection enables 
the levers to pull down the mandibles when the protractor muscles, 


Text-figure 21. 


0.M._ 


Mx. St... 
with 


Mx.L. 


Lygus pabulinus. 
Transverse section, showing the maxillary levers, ete. Ob. 3 & Oc. 8. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


which are attached to the former, contract. Proximally, at the 
bases of the levers, there is no hinge-like device but, on the 
contrary, they are fused with the sclerite. They are bifurcated 
distally, the mandibles passing through the fork. 

Their functions are :— 


(i.) They give attachment to the protractor muscles of the man- 
dibles, which muscles are attached to the distal ends only. 
(u.) The maxillo-mandibular muscles are attached to them. 
(Text-figs. 20, 21, Mx.Md.M.) 
(ui.) The antagonistic muscles, which serve to bring back the 
levers to their normal positions, are also attached to them. 
(Text-figs. 5, 20, A.M.) 
(iv.) The mandibles are supported by them. 


(B) The Maxillary Levers. (Text-figs. 1,5, 21, Mx.L.) 


These are narrow and elongate, and have no connection with 
the lateral walls of the head. Their proximal attachment is to 
the posterior arms of the tentorium, and distally they are con- 
nected with the maxille. They taper gradually towards their 


NY MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


bases, and are curved as they pass below the maxillary stylets, 
to which they are closely applied. 


Text-figure 22. 


Lygus pabulinus. 


Transverse section, showing the supra-cesophageal ganglion, the retractor 
muscles, etc. Ob. 3 & Oc. 8. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


Their relations are :— 
(i.) They support the maxillary stylets. 
(1i.) The maxillo-mandibular muscles are attached to them. 
(iii.) They never give attachment to any of the maxillary muscles, 
which are attached to the maxillary stylets themselves. 


Tue MUSCLES OF THE HEAD, 


The musculature of the head is very complicated. The diversity 
of the muscles is correlated with the diversity of function of the 
structures which are required for effecting suction. 

The groups of muscles are as follows :— 


(1) The Divaricators. (Text-fig. 2, D.M.) 


These muscles are attached to the upper wall of the pharynx ; 
the mode of their attachment varying in different parts of the 
head. In the clypeal region they are attached to the ligament of 
the operculum (the upper wall of the pharynx); while in the epi- 
cranium they are attached to the pharynx directly. 

T find that these muscles are strengthened by chitinous rods 
comparable perhaps to the tendons in the muscles of the verte- 
brates (text-fig. 2). 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 713 


These muscles fall into two groups, according to the mode of 
their attachment and arrangement :— 


(a) The fan- or feather-shaped muscles. (Text-figs. 14-21).— 
These are arranged like barbson a feather vein or rachis, alternating 
with one another on either side. This arrangement begins in the 
clypeal region and gradually disappears posteriorly. They are 
attached to the opercular ligament, which is the continuation of 
the soft chitin lining the operculum. In the clypeo-labral region, 
1.€.,1n the region where the gustatory organs are situated, the 
ligament passes between those organs to give attachment to these 
muscles. The gustatory organs consist of four lobes arranged in 
pairs on either side of the dorsal wall of the pharynx. (Text- 
figs. 27, 28.) 

The fan-shaped arrangement is found in the region where there 
isa great amount of work done; the work being to produce a 
vacuum sutticiently powerful to suck in the sap which is being 
accumulated in the pharyngeal duct. This vacuum is produced 
by contractions of these muscles, the operculum being pulled ont 
of the ventral wall of the pharynx. The arrangement described 
gives a large surface for the attachment of the muscles. 

(b) The strap-shaped muscles.—These are found in the epi- 
cranial region, where they are directly attached to the upper wall 
of the pharynx, which has here lost its character of operculum. 
Here its ventral wall also loses its chitin, and the whole structure 
is gradually transformed into the soft and thin cesophagus which 
is no longer concerned with suction. These muscles are attached 
to the dorsal wall of the head in the median line. 

The divaricators occupy a large area in the head, beginning in 
the clypeo-labral region and ending in the anterior part of the 
epicranium. 


(2) The Pump muscles, or Aspirators. (Text-figs. 2, 4, 5, 7, 
17, etc. P.M.) 


These are next to the divaricators in order of importance, 
though they do not occupy such a large space. They are very 
compact and powerful, as may be seen from the mode of their 
arrangement and attachment. They lie below the pharynx in the 
median line, but they diverge on either side towards the posterior 
arms of the tentorium, to the ventral surface of which they are 
fused. At the other end they are attached to the handle of the 
piston of the pump. 

When they contract they pull out the piston of the pump, the 
posterior arms of the tentorium being very strong and rigid at the 
sides. This pulling out cannot be an easy thing, small as the 
pump is, because the posterior wall, of which the piston forms a 
part, is made of thick, unyielding, though elastic, chitin, the 
resistance of which must be enormous. Hence their dispropor- 
tionate size and the mode of their attachment can easily be 
understood. 


14 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


(3) The Protractors of the Stylets. (Text-fig. 6, Mx.P., Md.P.) 


(a) The Protractors of the Mandibles. (Text-figs. hes 19, 
etc., Md.P.) 

These muscles are attached at one end to the distal ends of the 
levers of the mandibles (and not to the mandibles themselves), and 
at the other to the clypeal folds, which run into the head to a 
considerable distance. They are short and thick, and run obliquely 


Text-figure 23. 


| 


| 


Yd Se me Mx. St. 


Md C 


Md.H. 


T. Mx. 


T. Md. 


Lygus pabulinus. 
Tips of the stylets, showing the recurved hooks of the mandibles and smoothness 
of the maxillary stylets. Immersion-lens & Oc. 4. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


from one to the other. Their attachment at the distal ends of 
the levers makes it easy to pull the latter down with the mandibles. 
There is no hinge-like device at the bases of the levers, but when 
they are pulled down they do not, I think, regain their normal 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 715 


positions by their own elasticity alone or that of the side-walls of 
the head. ‘They are brought to their original positions by the 
antagonistic muscles. 

The protractors are the chief agents in bringing about pro- 
trusion of the mandibles. 


(5) The Protractors of the Maxille. (Text-figs. 16, 19, 21, etc., 
Mx.P.) 
They are attached at one end to the sides of the maxillary 


Text-figure 24. 


Lygus pabulinus. 
Hand section, showing the styiets in the plant-tissue. Stained with saturated 
picric in 90 per cent. alcohol. Ob. 3 & Oc. 4. 
For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


9 4S Now MUILIEX, 49 


Proc. Zoou. Soc. 


716 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


stylets (and not to the levers), and at the other to the maxillary 
sclerite. It has been shown above that the latter is nothing but 
the maxillary plate, the second half of the embryonic maxilla. 


(+) The Retractors of the Stylets. (Text-figs. 16, 19, 21.) 


These are attached to the sides of the mandibles and the 
maxillary stylets just below the retort-shaped organs at one end, 
and to the posterior walls of the head at the other. The stylets 
show peg-shaped structures for the attachment of the muscles 


Text-figure 25. 


Md. — 


= ae 


Refer to pp.l2. 


Lygus pabulinus. 


Transverse section of a petiole, showing the maxillary stylets forward and the 
mandibles behind, one of the hooks (*) of the latter being attached to the 
cellular wall. Immersion lens & Oc. 4. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


é OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. (Alii 


(text-fig. 6), which are spread at their other ends over a large part 
of the posterior wall of the head. 

The retractors of the mandibles consist of two groups which 
pass above and below the optic nerve (text-tig. 5). 


(5) The Maxillo-mandibular Muscles. (Text-figs. 20, 21, Mx. 
Md.M.) 


These run from the mandibular levers to the levers of the 
maxillary stylets on either side. It will be remembered that the 
mandibles and the maxillary stylets do not lie at the same level, 
one being above the other, and at the same time the maxillary 
stylets project further back into the head than the mandibles. In 
the normal position the tips of the mandibles and the maxillary 
stylets are level, and in this position they are thrust into the 
plant-tissue. 

When these muscles contract, they pull in the mandibles and 
push forward the maxillary stylets a little. Thus there is no 
hindrance to suction by the maxille, as they are free from the 
mandibles. At the same time the mandibles get themselves fixed 
into the cellular walls by means of their recurved hooks and thus 
steady the maxille for suction, as the latter are firmly attached 
to the former by the interlocking device. Thus these muscles 
play a useful part in the mechanism of suction. 


(6) Zhe Antagonistic Muscles. (‘Text-figs. 5, 6, 20, A.M.) 


These muscles are attached to the mandibular levers at one end 
and to the postero-dorsal wall of the head at the other. They are 
ealled antagonistic because they oppose the protractors of the 
mandibles in their action, inasmuch as they bring the levers 
back to their normal positions. They are very important, as there 
is no other device to effect this readjustment. 

They have nothing to do with the pharynx, as Bugnion and 
Popoff (4) seem to think, who describe these muscles as ‘ Antagon- 
istique ou Abaisseur du Pharynx.” The description that they 
are attached to “une lame horizontale rattachée au Pharynx par 
une expansion,” is absolutely inaccurate. This horizontal blade 
(lame) is nothing but the mandibular lever, which has nothing 
to do with the pharynx, but which is attached to the mandible. 
‘Ta lame horizontale tendant a effectuer un mouvement de bascule, 
Veffet de l’antagoniste doit étre d’abaisser le pharynx ou tout au 
moins de le maintenir en place au moment oti le dilatateur entre 
en action.” “La fonction du muscle antagoniste est de maintenir 
Yappareil en place.” With due respect to these authors, I think 
that their description is absolutely beside the mark. These 
muscles have nothing to do with the pharynx. Wedde, however, 
holds that there is no need for such antagonistic muscles of 
Bugnion. He says, “‘ Antagoniste fiir die Schlundmuskulature 
sind nicht vorhanden, es wirken als solche die héchst elastichen 
chitinteile des Pharynx selbst.” 

49* 


718 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


Wedde, however, thinks that they are the clypeal muscles, 
which have nothing to do with the mandibular lev ers, but whtteli 
ave attached to them. He does not seem to have understood the 
nature of the “horizontal bar,” which is nothing less than the 
mandibular lever. 


(7) The Constrictors or Circular Muscles. (Text-figs. 2, 7, 
Con.M.) 


These muscles are found in the cesophageal region. They lie 
outside the external epithelium of the cesophagus. Their con- 
traction and relaxation produce a kind of peristalsis which forces 
the sap onward into the stomach. Bugnion (4) says, “ quant au 
constricteur, son role doit étre de pousser dans lcesophage le 
liquide absorbe.” 


(8) The Valvular Muscles. (Text-fig. 7, V.M.) 


They are short and thin and extend from the base of the cardiae 
valve in the cesophagus to the posterior arms of the tentorium, to 
both of which they ave attached. When they contract, the sides 
of the valve are pulled apart, the valve thus opens, the lumen of 
‘the csophagus widens, and the sap, which is under a great 
pressure behind, is forced onward into the stomach, I cauinan 
find them described by any previous writer. 


(9) The Labial Muscles. (Text-figs. 2, 16, Lb.M.) 


These are found in the first segment of the labium, and seem 
to be important in increasing the amount of protrusion of the 
stylets by bending the labium. They are attached at one end to 
the supporting struts (buccal folds) on either side of the pump- 
cylinder, and at the other to the first joint of the labium, which is 
swollen, and thus offers a large area for the attachment of these 
muscles. 

It will be remembered that the proboscis bends upon itself, the 
bending occurring at the first joint. The deeper the required 
piant-tissue les, the greater 1s the bending of the proboscis. 
There must be some device to effect this bending, and such 
device is supplied by these labial muscles. When the muscles 
contract, the first joint is pulled up and acts as a hinge—the 
proboscis bending on it. 

According to Geise, Wedde, and Nietsche they are elevators 
and depressors of the labium. In the insect under consideration 
no muscles are found that could possibly function in this way. 


(10) Zhe Muscles of the Antenne. 


As these have nothing to do with suction, they will not be 
described. 

N.B.—Wedde has described two pairs of protractor muscles of 
the maxillary stylets, one of which is attached to the maxillary 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS., 719 


sclerite, the other passing below the pharynx. It seems that 
the latter pair does not represent the protractors but the pump 
muscles. 


Tur PHARYNX, on ScHLUNDKOPF. (Text-fig. 2.) 


This is one of the interesting and characteristic organs of the 
Rhynchota. In transverse sections it resembles roughly the 
pharynx of a sucking Dipterous insect (Nuttall and Shipley (40)). 
There are, no doubt, some differences in each case, but the general 
plan is the same throughout. In all these cases suction is effected 
by the production of a partial vacuum inside the pharynx, in 
order to fill which the sap or blood flows up the proboscis. 

The pharynx is a long, chitmous organ with a narrow 
lumen. Its structure varies in different regions of the head, and 
therefore it is proper to treat its several parts under different 
names, 

There are three distinct modifications in different regions :— 

(i.) The Pharyngeal duct, in the clypeal region, where the 
operculum as such does not exist, and the whole structure—here 
formed from the lower wall of the pharynx alone—forms one 
round duct which opens into the suction-canal. (Text-figs. 11-13, 
PhD») 

(ii.) The Pharynx proper, in the clypeal region and the anterior 
part of the epicranium, where its upper wall, as the operculum, is 
clearly distinguishable. (Text-figs. 14-21, Ph.) 

(ili.) The Csophagus, in the epicranial region, where the walls 
of the pharynx are soft, and the operculum as such disappears. 
(Text-figs. 2, 22, Cis.) 


(i.) Zhe Pharyngeal duct. 


This is the continuation of the pharynx proper into the labral 
region where it opens into the suction-canal. It is the modified 
pharynx, the modification consisting in a gradual elimination of 
the epipharynx from the upper wall of the pharyngeal duct, from 
behind forward. The lower wall at the same time gradually gets 
thinner and more rounded and ultimately forms a duct by itself. 
The divaricator muscles of the pharynx have disappeared with the 
operculum. At the place where the pharynx ends and the duct 
begins there are found the gustatory organs communicating with 
the lumen of the duct through the ecribriform plate (text fig. 26, 
G.Or., Cri.P].) In this region the hypopharynx (text-figs. 13, 14, 
Hyp.) is well developed, forming a folded structure supporting 
the maxillary stylets and the mandibles laterally, and enclosing 
the efferent salivary duct underneath. It supports the pharyngeal 
duct in the region where it has no other support, neither that 
of the body of the tentorium nor that of the tentorial arms. 
Anteriorly the hypopharynx becomes smaller and smaller and less 
folded. It brings the efferent salivary and the pharyngeal ducts 
nearer to each other (text-figs. 11-13, Ph.D., E.S.D.), and finally 


720 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


disappears, leaving free these ducts, which open ultimately into 
the suction- and the ejection-canals respectively (text-figs. 10 A 
and 10 B). 

The pharyngeal duct runs to a considerable distance into the 
suction-canal before it ends, The importance of this arrangement 
lies in the fact that it makes allowance for the movements—-up and 
down—of the maxillary stylets. Had this duct run to a shorter 
distance into the suction-canal, there would have been some 
danger of its slipping out when the stylets were pushed down 
to their natural limit of extension. 


(ii.) The Pharynx proper. 


This is found to begin in the clypeal region behind the clypeal 
folds and to end in the anterior part of the epicranium, It is 
bent anteriorly, and its bend corresponds to that of the head. 
Posteriorly it is straight and runs directly into the csaphagus, 
It is different in structure from the pharyngeal duct and from 
the esophagus. It is the chief organ of suction in the insect. 

When seen in transverse section it consists of two distinct parts : 
the ventral part and the dorsal, The first may be called the “ V ” 
and the second the operculum. ‘They are different in shape and 
structure. (Text-figs. 14-21.) 


(a) The “V” or ventral wall of the pharynx (V.Ph.).—This is 
more or less V-shaped in section, its angle being considerably 
drawn out in some places. In the anterior and the posterior 
regions this angle gets rounder, and the characteristic form of the 
“V" is lost, as in the pharyngeal duct and the esophagus. In 
the clypeal region, where the pharynx proper begins, the arms of 
the “ V” are elongated and fused with the clypeal folds running 
into the head (text-figs. 16, 17, 19, Clp.F.). Thus it is dorsally 
supported by these folds. 

In the same region, moreover, the ‘‘ V” is wedged ventrally 
into the body of the tentorium and retained there by the connec- 
tive tissue, its ventral shape corresponding exactly to the dorsal 
groove in the latter (text-figs. 17, 19, T.B., V.Ph.). The dorsal 
arms of the tentorium run parallel with those of the ‘*V” and 
support it laterally. It is this part of the pharynx which needs 
support because it is here that the sucking force is applied, 

The posterior arms of the tentorium as they run backward 
also support the pharynx to some extent, but they soon diverge 
laterally and leave it (text-fig. 20, P.A.). 

The “ V ” is of thick chitin which, however, becomes thin and 
soft anteriorly and posteriorly in the pharyngeal duct and the 
cesophagus. 

(b) Lhe Operculum or dorsal wall of the pharynx (Op.).—Its 
structure is entirely different from that of the “V”. It is closely 
apposed to the “V” in its normal position, which is regained 
by its own elasticity, and from which it is pulled by contraction 
of the divaricator (pharyngeal) muscles. It is obvious that there 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 021 


is no space left in the lumen of the pharynx when the operculum 
is in the normal position, but a strong vacuum is produced in it 
when it is pulled out. 

It is lined with a thin and soft chitin which is continued 
dorsally into a ligament to which the divaricators are attached. 

Posteriorly it loses its character as an operculum (text-fig. 22) ; 
it is no longer introversible though it remains flexible. The “ V” 
and the operculum form together, in this posterior part, one 
structure, which is more or less circular and is continued in the 
esophagus. In this region the muscles are directly attached to it 
instead of to the ligament. As it passes anteriorly into the 
pharyngeal duct it also loses its flexibility and introversibility. 
It fuses with the epipharynx (labrum) which now covers the 
ventral wall, and the muscles are again no longer attached to it. 
Thus in both directions (anteriorly and posteriorly) the pharynx 
proper loses its character as such, both in respect of the “ V” 
and the operculum. 

There is a hinge-like fold of chitin upon which the operculum 
turns inside out. It will be understood from the figure (text- 
fig. 20). 

The supports of the pharnyx proper are :— 


(i.) The hypopharynx. 

(ii.) The clypeal folds. 
(iii,) The body of the tentorium with its dorsal arms. 
(iv.) The posterior arms of the tentorium, 


All these supports make the “ V” immovably and firmly fixed 
in its proper place, while the operculum remains all the time 
flexible and introversible. 

The function of the pharynx proper is very important since it 
is the chief organ of suction. The pharyngeal duct cannot start 
suction as there ave no muscles attached to its dorsal wall, which * 
is no longer introversible; as explained above the operculum in its 
normal position is closely apposed to the “ V,” and thus there is 
no empty space between them. The muscles contract, the oper- 
culum is pulled out, and a strong vacuum is produced. To fill it 
up, the sap, which is now present in the pharyngeal duct, is sucked 
into it, 

Gil.) The Hsophagus. 

There is no sharp external demarcation between the pharynx 
proper and the cesophagus, the transition is gradual, the “ V ” and 
the operculum losing their characteristic structures. In some 
other species there is, at the entrance to the cesophagus, a constric- 
tion, which is due to the fact that the thick chitin of the pharynx 
proper ends suddenly where the cesophagus begins. ‘The nerve- 
mass, consisting of the supra-csophageal ganglia, the lateral 
commissures, and the sub-csophageal ganglia, surrounds the 
esophagus, which then opens straight into the stomach through 
the cardiac valve. 


~I 
BS 


MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


The csophagus is lined with the layers of an epithelium, and, 
innermost of all,a soft chitin, which disappears posteriorly : from 
this point, the outer layer of the cesophagus is generally one cell 
thick, the cells being small. The inner layer consists of elongated 
cells which have vacuoles in them, and which are greatly developed 
in the stomach. Outside the outer epithelial layer are found the 
vonstrictor and the valvular muscles. (Text-fig. 2, Con.M., V.M.) 

The Cardiac Valve (text-figs. 2, 7, C.V.)—This is very short, 
and it seems that its position in the cesophagus varies in different 
insects. In Schizoneura lanigera it is present at the end of the 
cesophagus (Davidson (9)), but in Lygus the valve is in its middle. 
It is formed by the doubling of a part of the cesophagus upon 
itself. The valvular muscles are attached to the base of the valve. 
It remains closed in the normal position until the muscles contract, 
when it is opened. 

It prevents any return-flow of the sap from the stomach into 
the cesophagus. 


Tue Gustatory Oreans. (Text-figs. 26-28.) 


That these are a specialised part of the supracesophageal 
ganglia is proved beyond doubt. They are situated upon the 


Text-figure 26. 


Nucleus. 


Nerve fibre. 


Nerve from the brain Cribriform Plate 
to the G.Or. with pores. 


Lygus pabulinus. 


Longitudinal section, showing the histological structures of the gustatory 
organs with the cribriform plate, etc. Ob. 6 & Oc. 4. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


operculum in the clypeo-labral region. There is a nerve running 
from the brain to these organs on the upper wall of the pharynx. 
Their histoiogical str uctures, though specialised, are similar to 
those of the brain, 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. G25 


In vertical sections, they show four lobes, arranged in pairs on 
either side of the operculum. The ligament passes through them 
to give attachment to the divaricators (text-figs. 27, 28, G.Or., 
Lig.). There are nerve-fibres running into the pharynx, and 
also from one lobe to the other. There are, moreover, small 
nerves issuing from them and distributing themselves over the 
epipharyngeal region. 


The Cribriform Plate (text- figs. 27, 28, Cri.P].).— The 
chitinous plate upon which these organs are situated is per- 
forated, and through it the nerve-fibres communicate outward 


Text-figure 27. 


G.0r. 


_ Nerve fibres joining 
the lobes. 


Upper wal! of — 
the Pharynx. 


Cribriform Flate- 


Gils | tase 


Lygus pabulinus. 
Vertical section of the gustatory organs with the cribriform plate, showing 
nerves passing to the periphery, etc. Ob. 6 & Oc. 4. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


with the lumen of the pharynx. This cribriform plate seems to 
be analogous with that found in the mammals, in which the 
olfactory nerve-fibres pass through its pores to the olfactory 
sense-organ. 

These organs seem to be gustatory. Their function seems to 
be to taste the sap as it comes into the pharyngeal duct. 


724 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


Text-figure 28. 


tig. 


Upper wall of 
the Pharynx. 


Nucle/. 
Nerve fibres 
Joining the lobes. 


Nerves to the 
Periphery, 


ee Soonr US. 
Vertical section of the gustatory organs with the cribriform plate, showing 


nerves passing to the periphery, ete. Ob. 6 & Oc. 4. 


For explanation of the lettering see p. 693. 


Tur PumMP-APPARATUS, OR WANZEN-SPRITZE. 


This apparatus is one of the characteristic structures of the 
Rhynchota, and has been described, though not in detail, by 
many writers. It was’ first discovered by Landois (28) in 
Cimex, and described later on by Wedde (46), in some: detail, 
in Pyrrhocoris. 

It has been found in almost all rhynchotous forms except the 
Anoplura. Wedde has attached so much importance to it as to 
divide the Hemiptera into two groups: (i.) Rhynchota setifera— 
with the pump-apparatus, and (ii.) Pediculide—without it. It is 
possible that, in the Pediculide, it may have escaped the notice 
of investigators, since it must be very minute. I am the more 
encouraged in this belief because Grove (16) says that the pump- 
apparatus is not found in Siphonophora rosarum (a tolerably big 
form), though he has figured it in his drawings (fig. 7 loc. cit.). 
He further says, ‘‘In exactly the same position in the small 
pointed under-lip.... which closes the mouth on its posterior 
margin, where the above authors have described the salivary 
pump, is a small U-shaped rod of solid chitin.” This small rod 
of solid chitin is nothing but the pump-cylinder. 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 725 


The pump may conveniently be divided into four parts for 
description :— 
(i.) The pump-cylinder with the pump-chamber and the 
Bre ae) (Wexp-test 2.03 (7) [4015216 POys 
-UD., £ OU.) 

(ii.) The piston with the handle. (Text-figs. 15,16; Pi., 

lei dls)) 
(iii.) The efferent salivary duct. (Text-figs. 3, 10-15, E.S.D.) 
(iv.) The afferent salivary duct. (Text-figs. 2, 3, 16, ete. 

A.S.D.) 


(i.) The pump-ceylinder with the pump-chamber and the pump- 
stem.—The pump-chamber is more or less oval in section, and its 
thick and rigid chitinous lining (constituting the pump-cylinder) 
consists of two walls, an anterior and a posterior, which differ 
from one another in structure and shape, though there is no 
discontinuity of chitin between them. 

(a) The anterior wall (A.W.P.). This is roughly semicircular 
in section. Its middle portion is drawn out anteriorly into a 
thickened solid process, which fuses with the hypopharynx, and 
this thick portion of the pump is known as the pump-stem (text- 
fig. 3, P.St.), which is perforated by the efferent salivary duct. The 
chitin of the anterior wall is thick, elastic, and incompressible. 
It gets, however, thinner laterally, and is continued into the 
posterior wall dorsally; but ventrally it lines the entrance of 
the afferent salivary duct. 

(6) The posterior wall. This is apposed to the anterior wall in 
the normal position. Its middle portion is swollen and is called 
the piston. This is continued backward to form the handle. 
Its chitinous lining is elastic, introversible, and can be retracted 
from the anterior wall to a certain extent when the pump 
muscles act. These muscles have already been described above. 

(c) The pump-chamber. The space between the walls, anterior 
and posterior, of the pump-cylinder constitutes the pump-chamber, 
In the normal position, when the posterior wall is apposed to the 
anterior, its capacity is reduced to a minimum. JIntroversion, of 
course, increases this capacity. Into the chamber opens antero- 
ventrally the afferent salivary duct, and from it issues antero- 
dorsally the efferent salivary duct, which latter finds its way out 
through the pump-stem to open into the ejection-canal of the 
maxille. (Text-figs. 3, 10 B., P.Ch.) 

(d) Attachment. The pump-cylinder is attached by connec- 
tive tissue to the body of the tentorium, which is situated just 
above it; the ventral groove of the tentorium corresponds 
exactly to the dorsal semicircular contour of the pump-cylinder. 
The attachment of the cylinder to the hypopharynx through the 
pump-stem has already been mentioned under (a). 


(ii.) The piston with the handle.—The middle portion of the 
posterior wall is swollen and continued backward to a considerable 


726 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECIANISM 


distance as a solid rod of chitin. To this the pump muscles 
are attached. This structure constitutes the piston and the 
handle, the swollen portion being the piston and the backward 
continuation the handle. The latter is flattened dorso-ventrally. 


(ii.) The efferent salivary duct.—This is a long and narrow 
duct, issuing antero-dorsally from the pump-chamber. It has 
a very narrow lumen and runs through the pump-stem and 
perforates the hypopharynx before it opens anteriorly into the 
ejection-canal. It has been shown above that the pharyngeal 
duct also runs through the same region of the hypopharynx on 
its way to the suction-canal. These ducts are thus brought 
together and connected with one another by the hypopharynx. 
Jt is the only connection between them; otherwise they are 
distinct from each other. They do not communicate with one 
another. And yet there are many misrepresentations about it. 
Many of the previous writers are very doubtful of the facts, and 
do not seem to know whether the efferent duct runs straight 
into the ejection-canal or the labial groove, or opens into the 
pharyngeal duct. Muir and Kershaw (22) write: ‘“ The syringe 
or salivary pump. . . opens on the basal part of the labium 
beneath the hypopharynx.” This statement is too vague to be 
eriticised. According to them, it seems that the efferent salivary 
duct opens into the labial groove. The same mistake has been 
made by Grove (16), and is also found in many text-books. The 
efferent salivary duct opens neither into the labial groove nor 
into the pharyngeal duct, but, on the contrary, runs straight into 
the ejection-canal and opens there. In short, the ducts, pharyn- 
geal and efferent salivary, are separate from one another and 
open into the suction- and ejection-canals of the maxillary stylets 
respectively. (Text-fig. 10, Su.C., E.C.) 
The efferent duct is supported by 


(i.) The pump-stem, and 
(ii.) The hypopharynx. 


It runs a considerable distance into the ejection-canal before 
it ends. This prevents its slipping out of the canal when the 
maxille are pushed down by their protractors. (Cf. pharyngeal 
duct.) 


(iv.) The afferent salivary duct.—The two salivary ducts issuing 
from the reservoirs on either side come together in the head and 
form the afferent or common salivary duet under the brain. 
This afferent duct is seen, in median longitudinal sections, 
running underneath the pump-cylinder and. opening antero- 
ventrally into the pump-chamber. It has a lumen bigger than 
that of the efferent salivary duct, and its walls are flexible and 
elastic. There is not a trace of a valve at its entrance into the 
pump-chamber. 


The salivary ducts (text-fig. 7, $.D.)—There are two salivary 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS, 127 


ducts, one on each side, issuing from the salivary reservoirs in 
the thoracic region. ‘They are narrow and Jong, and run straight 
into the head, where they join together and form the common 
salivary duct. They are always full of secretion, and as they 
are thin and elastic, their walls are distended. The secretion is 
therefore under pressure. 


The Function of the Pump. 


The structures of the pump, described above, will show that it 
is used to force the salivary secretion forward into the efferent 
salivary duct and thence into the ejection-canal of the maxillary 
stylets. Hence it has been called a force-pump. 

The ejection-canal pours the secretion straight into a wound in 
a leaf made by the stylets. The secretion does not leak out since 
the canal is air-tight, which will be seen from cross-sections. 
The shape of the cylinder in different species depends upon the 
degree of force required to drive the secretion through the 
efferent duct. The more minute this duct the more cylindrical 
is the pump: the return-stroke of the posterior wall is more 
powerful in proportion to the force required to pull out the 
piston. The posterior wall of the pump may be compared to 
a bow. 

In the normal position the posterior wall is apposed to the 
anterior, and the capacity of the chamber is reduced to a 
minimum. When the pump muscles, which are attached to 
the handle, contract, the piston is pulled out and with it the 
posterior wall. The capacity of the chamber slowly increases 
and a partial vacuum is produced. Now, either the secretion 
from the efferent duct or that from the afferent duct must flow 
into the chamber to fill up this vacuum. The former case is 
impossible, as the efferent duct is very short and empties itself 
into the ejection-canal as soon as it is charged with the secretion, 
and when empty its lumen would tend to collapse owing to the 
thinness of its walls. On the other hand, the salivary ducts are 
always full of secretion under pressure, and their walls are always 
distended by their contents. As soon, then, as a vacuum is pro- 
duced in the chamber, the secretion in the afferent duct flows 
forward into it. Thus, every time the muscles contract and the 
vacuum is produced, fresh secretion from the reservoirs flows into 
the pump-chamber. 

When the muscles relax, the posterior wall of the cylinder 
begins to return to its former position, the return-stroke being 
effected by its own elasticity. The fluid in the chamber 1s 
gradually being compressed, and is forced along the line of least 
resistance, which lies through the efferent salivary duct. This 
duct is empty now, while the afferent duct is full of secretion 
under pressure. The secretion therefore must flow into the 
efferent duct. The space of the chamber is gradually being 
reduced, and the entrance of the afferent duct into the chamber 


728 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


is closed when that critical point is reached at which the pres- 
sure inside the chamber becomes higher than that in the afferent 
duct. This closure is effected by the posterior wall itself, which 
slides over and closes the entrance to the duct. Thus there is no 
necessity for a valve, and the saliva, once in the chamber, never 
flows back into the afferent duct. 

To sum up:— 

(i.) The pump is a force-pump. 

(ii.) The return-stroke of the posterior wall is effected by its 
own elasticity, when it has been pulled from the anterior wall by 
the pump muscles. 

(iii.) The efferent salivary duct is short and empties itself into 
the ejection-canal as soon as it is charged with secretion, It is 
therefore empty when the return-stroke begins. 

(iv.) The afferent salivary duct is always full of secretion, 
which is always under pressure. It is longer than the efferent 
duct. 

(v.) No valve is required at the mouth of the afferent duct into 
the chamber ; nor are there any muscles to open it. Its opening 
and closing are automatic. 


Tur MECHANISM OF SUCTION. 


The functions of the different parts concerned in suction 
have now been described under their respective headings. The 
present section gives a connected account of the mechanism, 
summarising, at the same time, what has been said above. The 
following is a picture of the mechanism as it might be imagined 
from the arrangement of the different structures described. 

The mechanism consists of many structures in the dead co- 
ordinated with one another, from the piercing of the epidermis 
of a leaf by the stylets to the digestion of the sap in the stomach. 


(1) The stylets inside a leaf. 


The insect begins to feel the surface of a leaf with the sensory 
hairs at the tip of the proboscis (text-fig. 29). It is trying to 
find a good place for piercing. When it is found, the proboscis 
is applied to it, the stylets are driven forward, the protractors 
contract, and the epidermal layer is pierced, however thick it 
may be. 


(2) The bending of the proboscis. 


Once in, the stylets are pushed down into the tissue by direct 
mechanical force, 2.e. by the bending of the proboscis. This 
feature has already been alluded to. It increases artificially the 
protrusion of the stylets and enables them to reach the tissue 
which eontains food. It seems that the insect is not confined to 
any particular plant-tissues. The stylets may be found in the 
xylem, the phloem, or in the cortex which contains food-substances 
(text-figs. 24, 25). 


“I 
to 
ble) 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 


Text-figure 29. 


The growwe of 
the Proboscis. 


3° Joint: 
Sensory or 
tactile hairs, 


Tip of the 
Frobosciss 


Lygus pabulinus. 


Mount, showing the labium macerated in potash and stained with saturated 
picricin, 90 per cent. ale. 


(3) Injection of Saliva into the wound. 


When the stylets reach the particular tissues, the maxillo- 
mandibular muscles begin to act. Their function has already 
been dealt with. The mandibles, when they are pulled in by 
these muscles, get fixed into the cellular walls by means of their 
recurved hooks (text-fig. 25). The maxillary stylets are made 
steady in them action by the mandibles because of their 
interlocking arrangement. 

Before the sap is sucked through the suction-canal, 1t seems 
that saliva is injected into the wound made by the stylets. It is 
possible that the saliva, by being mixed with the sap, may trans- 


730 MR, P. R. AWATI ON THE MECIIANISM 


form starch into sugar and thus help its digestion. Plateau (41) 
has proved that the saliva of insects has this effect. It is 
doubtful whether the sap is coagulated by exposure to air, but if 
so, the saliva may prevent its coagulation. A third possibility 
is that saliva may make the sap less viscid. 


(4) Turgidity of the Cells. 


This may be important indirectly in forcing the sap mixed 
with saliva into the suction-canal of the maxillary stylets. The 
cells of a tissue are always turgid and their walls are stretched to 
their utmost capacity. They collapse if pricked, and squirt out 
the sap with some force. The maxillary stylets pierce the cells, 
the sap of which may thus be forced into the empty suction- 
canal, since the other canal is full of the salivary secretion. I 
attach no great weight to this possible factor in suction. 


(5) Capillarity. 

This factor may now come into action, and by its means the 
sap would begin to ascend in the suction-canal if this were open 
at the top. The sap reaches the pharyngeal duct, which hangs 
into the suction-canal, and is thus immersed in the sap. 


(6) Suction. 


The divaricators of the pharynx begin to act. Those of the 
anterior part of the clypeus contract first. The operculum is 
pulled out and a vacuum is formed between it and the “ V.” 
The sap is sucked into the pharynx from the pharyngeal duct. 
The muscles relax, and the operculum regains its former position. 
Meanwhile the muscles lying posteriorly contract, the operculum 
is pulled out, and the sap is forced onwards. The muscles lying 
still more posteriorly, do the same thing, and the same process is 
repeated. Thus there is a wave of contraction of muscles passing 
backwards, and the sap is continuously forced on towards the 
stomach. It is prevented from flowing back, because there is no 
empty space behind, since the operculum regains its normal 
position with relaxation of the anterior muscles. 

Thus, in the pharynx there are two complementary factors 
which force the sap onwards towards the esophagus :— 


(i.) The vacuum produced by the raising of the operculum. 
(il.) Elasticity of the operculum, which enables it to regain 
its normal position. 


(7) The Gsophagus. 


The sap is forced into the cesophagus, the walls of which are 
soft and flexible and have attached to them the constrictor 
muscles. As the sap distends the walls, the muscles contract, 
and a peristalsis is produced which forces the sap onwards towards 
the cardiac valve. 


— 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 73 


(8) The Cardiac Valve. 


The valvular muscles contract, the valve opens, and the sap is 
forced into the stomach. 


(9) fhe Stomach. 


This is a bag-like strueture and stores the sap. 


To sum up :— 
There are the following factors at work :— 


G.) Capillarity in the suction-canal, helped by turgidity of the 
cells. 

(ii.) Suction produced by the vacuum through the raising of 
the operculum. 

(ii.) The peristalsis in the cesophagus by means of the 
constrictors. 

(iv.) The valvular action, which prevents the sap from flowing 
back into the cesophagus from the stomach. 


The pharyngeal duct hangs into the suction-canal and is 
immersed in the sap. A question arises whether it is possible 
for the sap to avoid the duct and flow into the body-cavity from 
the suction-canal. The sap cannot do so because (i.) there is no 
difference of pressure to force the sap into the body-cavity, and 
because (ii.) there is active suction through the pharyngeal duct. 

Another important thing for suction is that the suction- and 
ejection-canals must be separate and distinct from each other. 
The least intercommunication will stop the whole mechanism. 
Also one canal cannot serve two contradictory purposes—one of 
sucking and the other of ejecting saliva. The whole mechanism, 
therefore, depends upon the presence of the two canals. (But, 
curiously enough, the Bed-bug, Cimesx, is stated to present such 
an anomalous case. It has only one canal for sucking the blood 
and ejecting the saliva as well. Recently it has been described 
by Dr. Max Braun (1): “In shape the maxille resemble two 
gutters, the concave surfaces of which face one another and so 
forma tube. This serves to conduct the blood from the wound 
into the pharynx and also saliva into the wound. In other 
Hemiptera food and saliva are conveyed by two distinct channels 
formed by the longitudinal ridge which runs down the groove of 
each maxilla, dividing it into two parts.” This is not the case 
actually, as I hope shortly to show by figuring sections of its 
mouth-parts.) 


Damage to the Plant. 


That Lygus pabulinus does some damage to potato plants 
has been conclusively proved by the elaborate experiments of 
Prof. Lefroy, of the Imperial College of Science, and Mr. Horne. 

It is sufficient to say here that the insect drills into the leaves 
holes which are bordered afterwards by brown rims. It does not 

Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. L. 50 


52 MR. P. R. AWATI ON THE MECHANISM 


come within the scope of this paper to deal with the pathological 
effects due to the insect-bites; but the way in which these holes 
ave drilled is described below. 

The structure and the shape of the stylets have been described 
above. The tips of the maxillary stylets are smooth and lancet- 
shaped, but those of the mandibles are deeply serrated (text- 
fig. 23). The tip of the proboscis is covered with stiff hairs and 
is blunt. How the stylets work inside the plant-tissue has been 
described above. The insect is found on the same place for hours 
at a stretch. It withdraws its stylets every few minutes from the 
plant-tissues and thrusts them in again. ‘This process is repeated 
many times. Since the mandibles can only be withdrawn by 


tearing the cells each time they are taken out with their. recurved 


hooks (text-fig. 25), and as this process is repeated many times, 
a big area 1s “ultimately macerated and a hole is formed there 
afterwards. 

Tt was held by many writers—Dr. Riley being one of them— 
that the Heteroptera made holes with the proboscis, the Homo- 
ptera with the stylets. This view is absolutely inaccurate, since 
it is found that the proboscis is incapable of drilling holes, its 
tip being too thick and blunt to pierce the epidermis. Sections 
of plants taken with the stylets iz situ show that the stylets 
enter the tissues, the proboscis itself remaining outside, as 


deseribed above. 
BIBLIOGRAPHY. 


(1) Braun (Max). 1910.—A Handbook of Practical Parasitology. 

(2) Biseen (M.). 1891.—Der Honigtau. Jena. Zeitschr., Bd. xxv. 

(3) Boenton (B.) et Pororr (N.). i903.—L’appareil salivaire des Hémiptéres. 
Arch. d’Anat. micr., t. x. fase. ii.; t. xi. fase. iv. 

(4) Buenron (E.) et Poporr (N.). 1911.—Les piéces buccales des Hémiptéres. 
Premiére partie. Arch. Zool. expér., sér. 5, tome vil. 

(5) Burmetster. 1835.—Handbuch der Entomologie, II. Rhynchota. 

(6) Comstock and Koocnt., 1902.—The Skeleton of the Head of Insects. The 
American Naturalist, vol. xxxvi. 

(7) Craee (Capt.). 1913.—Studies on the Mouth-parts and the Sucking Apparatus 
of the Blood-sucking Diptera. Scientific Memoirs by Officers of the 
Medical and Sanitary Department of the Government of India, 
Nos. 58, 59. 

(8) DANEDSON | (J.). 1913.—Biological Study of Schizoneura lanigera. Q.J.M.S, 
vo vill. 

(9) Dimmockx. 1881.—The Anatomy of the Mouth-parts and the Sucking 
Apparatus of some Diptera. 

EO) ae oa: 1866.—Zur Anatomie der Hemipteren. Stettin. Entom. Zeit., 

ahrg. 27. 

(11) Dreyrvus (L.). 1894.—Phylloxeriden. Zool. Anz. Bd. xvii. pp. 221-235. 

(12) Dvrour (L). 1821—Anatomie de la Rantre linéaire et la Népe cendrée. 
Ann. Génér. des Sciences phys. nat. Bruxelles, t. vil. 

(18) Gets (O.). 1883.—Mundtheile der Rhy nchoten. Archiv f, Naturg. 
Bd. xlix. pp. 315-373. 

(14) ae 1853.—Ueber die Mundtheile der saugenden Insekten. 

eipzig. : 
(15) GrapeEr. 1877.—Die Insekten, Theil I. (Muiinchen.) 


(16) Grovs (A. J.). 1909.—Anatomy of Stphonophora rosarum. Parasitology, . 


vol. i1., 1909. 

(17) Handbuch der Vergleichenden Physiologie, 1911. Bd. ii. Halfte i.. 2 

(18) Heymons (R.). 1896.—Die Mundtheile der Rhynehota (Homoptera— 
Heteroptera). Entom. Nachrichten, Jahre. xxii. No. 11. 


a 


OF SUCTION IN LYGUS PABULINUS. 733 


Huymons (R.). 1897.—Ueber die Zusammensetzung des Insekten-Kopfes. 
Sitzber. Ges. nat. Freunde, Berlin. 

Heymons (R.). 1899.—Beitrige zur Morphologie u. Entwickelung. der 
Rhynchoten. Nova Acta, vol. Ixxiv.; Zool. Centralbl. vii. pp. 33-36. 
Kersuaw (J. C.). 1911.—Notes on the Salivary Glands and Syringe of two 

species of Hemiptera. Ann. Soc. Entom. Belgique, tome ly. 

Kersuaw (J. C.) and Murr (F.). 1911—The Homologies and Mechanism of 
the Mouth-parts of Hemiptera. Psyche, vol. xviii. No. 1. 

Kerrsuaw (J. C.) and Murr (F.). 1912.—The Development of the Mouth. 
parts in the Homoptera, with Observations on the Embryo of Siphanta. 
Psyche, vol. xix. No. 3. 

Kersuaw (J. C.) and Murr (F.). 1911.—Later Embryological Stages of the 
Head of Pristhesancus papuensis. Psyche, vol, xviii. No. 2. 

KRAEPELIN ol 1882.—Ueber die Mundtheile der saugenden Insekten. 
(Leipzig. : 

KRAEPELIN (G.). 1884.—Ueber die systematische Stellung der Puliciden. 
(Hamburg.) 

Ktncxen (J.). 1866—Recherches sur les organes de Sécrétion chez les 
Insectes de ordre des Hémiptéres. Compt. rend. de l’Acad. de Sc. Paris, 
t. Ixiii. 

Lanvpors (L.). 1868-69.—Zur Anatomie der Bettwanze, etc. Zeit. f. wiss. 
Zoo). Bd. xvili. & xix. 

Lron oer 1887.—Beitrige zur Kenntniss der Mundtheile der Hemipteren, 
(Jena. 

Leon (N.). 1892.—Labialtaster bei Hemipteren. Zool. Anz., Bd. xv. 
pp. 145, 146. 

Leon (N.). 1894.—E. Schnudts Lippentaster. Zool. Anz., Jahrg. xvii, 
No. 146. 

Leon (N.). 1897.—Beitrage zur Kenntniss des Labiums der Hydrocoren. 
Zool. Anz., Bd. xx. pp. 73-77. 

Leon (N.). 1901.—Rech. morph. sur les piéces labiales des Hydrocores. 

Maruattr (C. l.). 1895—The Hemipterous Mouth. Proc. Entom. Soc. 

Washington, vol. ii. No. 4. 

Martarr (C. L.). 1898.—The periodical Cicada. U.S. Dep. Agric., Divis. 

Entomology, Bulletin 14. 

Mayer (P.). 1874-75.—-Anatomie von Pyrrhocoris apterus. Reichert und 

du Bois-Reymond’s Arch. f. Anat. u. Physio. 

Merx (W. J.). 1903.—The Mouth-parts of the Hemiptera. Kansas 

University Science Bulletin, vol. ii. No 9. 

Newerort (G.). 1839.—Insects. Cyclop. Anat. Physiol., vol. ii. 

Nietscue (V.). 1907.—Die Mundtheile der Rhynchoten. Mitth. nat. Ver. 
Steiermark, Bd. xliv. 

Nourratt and Surprey. 1903.—The Journal of Hygiene, vol. iii. No, 2. 

PratEav. 1874.—Recherches sur les phénoménes de la digestion chez les 
Insectes. (Bruxelles.) 

Savieny (G.). 1816.—Meém. sur les Animaux sans Vertébres. J., 1. 

ScHaupinn (F.).—Arbeiten, 

Scumipr (E.). 1891.—Lippentaster bei Rhynchoten und Systematische 
Beziehung der Nepiden und Belostomiden. 

Suiru (J. B.). 1892—The Structure of the Hemipterous Mouth. Science, 
April, pp. 189-190. 


- Weppke (H.). 1885.—Beitrage zur Kenntnis des Rhynchotenriissels. Archiv 


f. Natureg., Jahre. li. 

Wirraczit (E.). 1886.—Die Saugapparat der Phytophthives. Zool. Anz. 
Bad. ix. 

Houxtey (T. H.). 1858.—On the Organic Reproduction and Morphology of 
Aphis. Trans. Linn. Soc.‘vol. xxii. 

Mecznixow (N.). 1869.—Beitrage zur Embryonalentwickelunz der Insekten. 
Troschel’s Arch. f. Naturg. Jahre. xxxv. 

Wrrracatt (K.). 1882.—Zur Anatomie der Aphiden. Arb. a. d. Zool. Inst. 
Univ. Wien, vol. iv.; Zool. Anz. 

Rosinson (L. E.) and Davtpson (J.).—The Anatomy of Argus persicus. 
Parasitology. vol. vi, No. 1. 


ie 
_ = 


cal 


‘SAHOINODSIG.L NOHAO TW o0dd 


pal UossisIued ® aed 


di Wel “INO'SUINAWN “GIG SA al 


TSSLEOMMC DUS, INOs(slOMOOjske! 


‘uossfetueqd FY 3x[eg 


pri 


i “iel, INOS ENINA, PIG IL $S)— Ze tel 


ASELEFOMNCOFDSHIL, INONSelO MUO O)OVvStel 


pyl ‘Uossfaued BF eTeg 


“UNE “el INOS WWM “HIG S92 “al 


ON A FOSSIL REPTILE. aw 


41. Procolophon trigoniceps, a Cotylosaurian Reptile from 
South Afriea. By D. M. 8. Watson, M.Sc., F.Z.S., 
Lecturer in Vertebrate Paleontology in University 
College, London. 


[Received May 18, 1914: Read June 9, 1914. | 
(Plates I.-ITi.* and Text-figures 1-5.) 


INDEX. 
Page 
Structureweyei 7 ae ee eect | Yio 
Systema ticpae yen cca eee erence) 6 HA: 


The little reptile Procolophon has long been known, and the 
work of Owen, Seeley, Woodward, and Broom has made us 
acquainted with much of its structure. During my visit to South 
Africa, I was fortunate enough to collect in the original locality, 
Donnybrook, Upper Zwaart Kei, Dist. Queenstown, a nearly 
complete skeleton (hereafter referred to as the female skeleton) 
and several skulls and fragments. On the farm, Haslop Hill, 
which lies about fifteen miles north of Donnybrook, I obtained 
another almost absolutely complete and very well - preserved 
skeleton, which I shall call the male skeleton. 

This material, together with that in the British Museum, is 
perhaps the most extensive in existence for the study of any 
early reptile, and gives knowledge of almost every detail of the 
structure. 

Skull.—The general structure of the skull has long been known, 
but it is now possible to deseribe the basis cranii and brain-case 
in detail. 

The basioccipital is a comparatively small bone whose posterior 
end is formed by the transversely widened condyle, which is 
rounded. The upper surface of the bone carries the exoccipitals 
at the sides,-and the middle part of its upper surface is somewhat 
depressed and supports the brain. On the ventral surface the 
bone is soon covered by the basisphenoid but contributes to 
the tubera. 

The basisphenoid is a large and remarkable bone; on its lower 
surface two strong ridges continue the tubera forward and termi- 
nate in the basipterygoid processes, whose flat articular faces look 
well to the front. It is possible that the basipterygoid process 
is pierced by a foramen Vidii, but this is not certain. Between 
these ridges is a very deep groove, which in front passes upwards 
into the skull, separating the basipterygoids. From the sides of 
the bone immediately below and in front of the fenestra ovalis, a 
short but relatively powerful process passes outwards and back- 
wards and ends freely. On the upper surface the basisphenoid is 


a 


* For explanation of the Plates see p. 747. 


736 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


much excavated in the middle, and its lateral borders rise to the 
opisthotics. The upper surfaces of the processes spoken of above 
are deeply grooved, and the grooves from them pass on to the body 
of the bone, forming a depression stretching right across it. In 
front of this is a ridge which marks the posterior border of the 
pituitary fossa, whose surface is not very well preserved in any 
case. 
Text-figure 1. 


BSP Vest. BOc. 


Procolophon trigoniceps. 


A. Base of skull and otic region viewed from below and the right side. X 2. 

B. View of lett side of brain-cavity. 2. 

B.Oc., Basioccipital ; B.Pr., Basipterygoid processes ; B.Sp., Basisphenoid ; 
Ev.Oc., Exoccipital ; F.Jug., Foramen jugulare; #.V., Foramen Vidii? ; 
Fen.Ov., Fenestra ovalis; Op.O., Opisthotic; P7.0., Pro-otic; Vesti., 
Vestibule. 

The exoccipital is a bone of medium size, articulating with the 
upper surface of the basioccipital. It is comparatively long, and 
is pierced at about the middle of its length by two small foramina 
for the twelfth nerve, which he just above its lower border. 
These two openings soon join and open ina single foramen on 
the outside of the cranium. The bone extends outwards for a 
little distance with its upper part in contact with the posterior 
surface of the paroccipital, from which bone it is separated below 
by the large, round foramen jugulare. The exoccipital forms the 


A FOSSIL REPTILE. (avi 


side-wall of the foramen magnum, and its upper end is in contact 
with the supraoccipital. 

The opisthotic is a large and powerful bone. Its inner end 
was largely cartilaginous, and its ossified part does not touch the 
basis craniil. Part of its posterior face is covered by the ex- 
occipital, lateral to which it forms the very deep and massive 
paroccipital process, the distal upper corner of which is connected 
with the tabulare. The front of the paroccipital process is 
covered by the pro-otic, and the two bones combine to form a 
rounded groove on the lower surface in which the stapes lies. 

The pro-otic is applied to the anterior face of the opisthotic, 
and resembles that bone in having a largely cartilaginous inner 
end. This is, however, larger in area and is clearly pierced by a 
foramen, or possibly two, for the VIIthand VIIIth nerves. On 
the inner side of the skull the inner ear is widely open and lies 
high in the side-wall of the brain-cavity. The whole condition is 
extremely like that in a tortoise. The front edge of the pro-otic 
has a large incisura for the trigeminus, below which is a pro- 
minent process. The fenestra ovalis is a very large irregular 
hole in the bony skull. 

Text-figure 2. 


ja 
EZ Zi) = 


Procolophon trigoniceps. 
A. Posterior aspect of skull. 1. 
B. Right lateral aspect of skull. X 1. 
Composite figures from three perfect skulls. 


The supraoccipital is a very delicate bone, whose inner aspect is 
not known; externally it is exactly like that of a lizard, touching 
the parietals by a very small point, if at all directly. 

The stapes is a relatively thick rod, whose outer end is expanded 
into a plate. 

There is a slender epipterygoid, which expands below and is 
broadly fastened on to the outer surface of the pterygoid just 


738 MR. D. M. 8. WATSON ON 


outside its articulation with the basisphenoid. This rises in the 
skull till its upper end nearly touches the parietal lateral to the 
parietal foramen. 

The general structure of the roof of the skull is already quite 
familiar from the figures and descriptions of Seeley, Smith 
Woodward, and Broom. The figures in this paper will, I hope, 
explain any doubtful points: the relations in important regions 
are described below. 

The quadrate is a comparatively small bone; it has a small 
condyle for the mandible, above which it rises vertically. The 
body of the bone is in contact with the very large and massive 
quadratojugal at its lateral border; it is then separated from 
this bone by the quadrate foramen. Above this level the whole 
posterior surface of the quadrate is covered by the squamosal. 
The quadrate sends a long process inwards which is covered 
posteriorly by the posterior ramus of the pterygoid. 

The squamosal isa bone of medium size which may be described 
as consisting of three parts. The posterior and largest of these 
covers much of the back of the quadrate; it curves round to 
form the second region, which lies entirely on the outer side of 
the skull, having sutures with the quadratojugal, jugal, post- 
orbital, and tabulare. The third part arises from the other two 
and passes inwards and backwards over the otic notch to nearly 
or quite touch the parietal. The whole of this part is covered by 
the tabulare. 

The tabulare is a very large bone forming the posterior corner 
of the flat upper surface of the skull. Its anterior end overlaps 
the parietal and squamosal to a very large extent, but its hinder 
margin is free, and is deflected to meet the upper posterior corner 
of the paroccipital. 

Of postparietals there is usually no trace, but in the skull of 
the female skeleton, which is well preserved, there are quite 
clearly a pair of small bones articulating with the pointed mesial 
posterior ends of the parietals. These are very small, only about 
1 millimetre square, but can only be interpreted as vestigial post- 
parietals. They stand out quite freely and touch no underlying 
bones. 

An interesting point is that the nasal cavity is very largely 
separated from the very large orbit by plates arising’ from the 
lachrymal and prefrontal. 

The septomaxilla is a small bone articulating with the pre- 
maxilla and nasal and forming the posterior border of the nostril. 

‘The material at my disposal has shown no trace of a para- 
sphenoid, but Dr. Broom has recorded it in an Albany Museum 
specimen. 

A curious feature of the very well-preserved skull of the male 
skeleton is the presence of a small depression with rather stee 
walls on the outer surface of the maxillaand nasal, just behind the 


upper end of the septomaxilla. This prabably lodged a superior 
labial gland. 


A FOSSIL REPTILE. 739 


One feature of the skull about which there has been some 
dispute is the presence or absence of a foramen in the temporal 
region. There is no doubt that Broom is quite correct in denying 
its, presence, but in justice to Prof. Seeley and the British Museum 
mason, it should be pointed out that the hole in this region in 
their skulls i is not an artifact, but is due to a rotation inwards of 
the posterior edge of the postorbital as a result of slight 
crushing. 


Text-figure 3. 


Procolophon trigoniceps. 


(A) Outer, and (B) Inner aspects of lower jaw. X 1. 


Ang, Angular; Cr., Coronoid; Den., Dentary; P.Art., Prearticular ; 
Sp., Splenial; Sur. Ang., Surangular. 


Composite figures from two specimens. 


The structure of the lower jaw will be understood from text- 
fig. 3. The sutures separating the prearticular from the articular 
and angular are not clear in any specimen, but I think they are 
faintly shown as figured in the skull of the female skeleton. 
Every other suture is obvious. 

The coronoid extends forward between the dentary and splenial 
for some distance. 

Vertebral column.—There are twenty-six presacral vertebre. 
The axis has a powerful spine, very long anteroposteriorly ; and 
powerful posterior zygapophyses, which are continued forwards 
into a broad table. There is a large intercentrum between the 
centrum of the axis and the odontoid. The odontoid is not known 
in detail. 

The atlantal intercentrum is large and its anterior face forms 
part of the cup for the occipital condyle. There is a pair of 
neural arches to the atlas. These are separated posteriorly by 
the neural spine of the axis; each has a facet on its inner face by 
which it articulates with the odontoid, anteriorly it has an 
articular face for the basioccipital. In front its upper surface is 
overlapped by the proatlas, and behind it articulates with the 


740 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


prezygapophysis of the axis. The atlas is very short from back 
to front. The proatlas is paired (and articulates with the skull ?). 

The remaining presacral vertebre are all much alike, but their 
neural arches become heavier as they are traced backward. The 
centra are completely pierced by the notochord and are consider- 
ably constricted, the lower surfaces, however, being flattened. 
The articular ends are expanded. There are intercentra between 
all the presacrals ; these are single crescentic bones of an ordinary 
character. Broom records paired intercentra between the third 
and fourth vertebree. I have not seen this region. 

The neural arches are heavy, extremely so in the posterior 
part of the column. The articulating faces of the zygapophyses 
are flat and placed horizontally throughout. The neural spines 
are only represented by very short projections on the top of the 
swollen neural arch. 

The rib articulations are single, carried at the end of a short 
transverse process, contributed to by both arch and centrum, in 
the anterior part of the column; with the progressive increase 1n 
size of the neural arch this process becomes obsolete, but the rib 
articulation remains essentially similar. 

The first sacral vertebra is very short anteroposteriorly ; it 
carries a very large rib articulating with both arch and centrum, 
and its neural arch is heavy. The anterior zygapophyses are 
wide apart, but the posterior facets are placed close together. 
The second and third sacral vertebre have slender arches, but 
their articulation-faces are still flat and horizontal. The caudal 
vertebre are not well exposed in any specimen ; anteriorly they 
resemble the posterior sacrals, but further back they develop 
fairly high spines and long chevron bones. It is not known how 
far back they carry ribs. 

The ribs are single-headed throughout and present no feature 
of interest. There is some evidence of a rib on the atlas, and 
there are certainly ribs on all the other presacral vertebra except, 
perhaps, the last two or three, on which I have not seen any; 
even in a well-preserved skeleton, if present, they were short. 

Abdominal ribs.—Three specimens show the whole series of 
abdominal ribs. The plastron is extremely reduced, consisting of 
at most five series of transverse rows each composed of six very 
small slender elements. These are divided into two groups, which 
do not meet in the middle line. The whole arrangement is about 
a centimetre from back to front, and lies about 15 mm. behind 
the pectoral girdle, cf. text-fig. 4, B. 

Pectoral girdle—The general features of the pectoral girdle 
have long been known. 

The scapula stands nearly vertically and is a simple bone with- 
out an acromion. It has a ridge down its outer surface and 
thickens considerably at the glenoid cavity. The anterior part of 
the lower margin of the bone is in contact with the precoracoid, 
and for the anterior half of this union the external surface of 
one bone is directly continued on to the other. Posteriorly this 


A FOSSIL REPTILE. 741 


surface is interrupted by the notch which forms the glenoid 
cavity. The posterior part of this is formed by the coracoid, 
which articulates with the scapula and precoracoid, and extends 
backwards behind them for a long distance. 

The glenoid cavity thus formed by all three bones looks almost 
directly outwards and is essentially a trihedral pit; it must have 
been covered during life by a thick pad of cartilage, but can never 
have shown any trace of the screw-shape shown in early Coty- 
losaurs such as Diadectes, Labidosaurus, and, to a less extent, 
“ Pariasaurus.” . 

Text-figure 4. 


Procolophon trigoniceps, 6. 


A. Right lateral aspect of shoulder-girdle.  X 1. 

A’. Ventral aspect of shoulder-girdle. X 1. 

B. Ventral aspect of shoulder-girdle, and abdominal ribs. X 1. 
C. Right side of pelvis from outside. 1. 


The so-called notch in the precoracoid proves when fully 
exposed to be really a foramen passing through the bone and 
opening on its upper surface. Its most remarkable feature is 
the strong rounded ridge which forms its anterior border on the 
lower surface. 

The clavicles are large bones, beginning at the upper margin 
of the scapula; they run down the whole anterior border of that 
bone and then turn suddenly in, being vertically expanded and 
applied to the anterior face of the T-shaped interclavicle. 

The humerus of Procolophon is a very remarkable bone. The 


742 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


head is a large triangular area, obviously covered by a thick pad 
of cartilage during life. 

The anterior lower corner of the head gives rise toa ridge 
which rapidly subsides into the shaft and forms the only repre- 
sentative of the deltoid crest. 

The anterior upper corner also gives rise to a ridge which 
passes down the dorsal and anterior edge of the humerus until it 
in turn passes into the shaft. 

The posterior lower corner of the triangular head gives rise to 
a pronounced ulnar crest of much greater size than the radial 
expansion. The bone has a narrow shaft which expands into the 
wide lower end of the bone. This bears a prominent condyle for 
the head of the radius and one for the ulna. There is a large 
entepicondyle with a foramen. 

The radius and ulna present no marked features. 

The carpus and manus are exactly as Dr. Broom has already 
figured them; the radiale is unossified; in the male skeleton 
traces of its cartilage were preserved. 

Pelvic limb.—The pelvis, as shown in my specimens, is rather 
different from that of Dr. Broom’s specimen. 

The ilium is high and narrow, it is supported by the three 
sacral ribs, and placed almost vertically; it forms about a third 
of the acetabulum, above which it is thickened to form the usual 
process. 

The pubis is an extremely massive bone, nearly square when 
seen from below, and pierced by the foramen ; it articulates with 
its fellow so that the lower surfaces meet in an angle considerably 
less than two right angles; in other words, the lower surface of 
the pelvis is not flat. The upper surface of the pubis slopes 
down very rapidly in front. 

The ischia present no special features. 

The hind leg has already been well described and figured by 
Seeley and Broom; my specimens agree exactly with theirs. 

The restoration of the skeleton in a walking attitude, text- 
fig. 5, is drawn entirely from the male skeleton. 

The length of the neck depends on the actual position of the 
pectoral girdle in the specimen, which is quite undisturbed, lying 
on the ventral surface with the fore legs placed straight back 
along the body and the soles of the two feet together along the 
tail. The head is turned sharply to the right, but as every bone is 
in close and accurate articulation this position must be a possible 
one. In the female skeleton the head is in a similar position, 
and the shoulder-girdle equally far back. The tail in the 
restoration is completed from the entire series of caudals of the 
female skeleton. 

Taken as a whole Frocolophon is very lizard-like in build, 
although it is rather massively constructed. 

The male and female skeletons are of exactly the same length, 
as are their skulls. The dentition is quite similar in the two 
specimens, and I think there is not the slightest doubt that they 


A FOSSIL REPTILE. 743 


belong to the same species. The female skeleton is, however, 
much more lightly built, having narrower and more slender limb- 
girdles, and limbs which are less than three-quarters as long as 
those of the male skeleton and much less robust. Mr. Boulenger 
tells me that differences of this kind often distinguish the 


Text-figure 5. 


Procolophon trigoniceps. 


Restoration of the skeleton of a male, all the bones except those in dotted 
outline being drawn from a single individual. X 2. 


744 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


sexes in living Lizards, and I think it is extremely probable that 
the same reason accounts for the difference between my two 
skeletons. 


Affinities of Procolophon. 


That Procolophon is a Cotylosaurian has been recognised by all 
recent workers. Its right to inclusion in this group depends 
on its roofed skull (it is perfectly obvious from the examination 
of well-preserved skulls that the large opening on either side is 
entirely an enlarged orbit and not, as has sometimes been sug- 
gested, a joint orbit and temporal fossa), and on the typically 
Cotylosaurian vertebre which are very similar to those of 
Labidosaurus. 

Mere reference of an animal to the Cotylosauria means very 
little, as that great group includes animals which differ at. least 
as much from one another as do a Lizard and Sphenodon, or even 
a Tortoise and a Crocodile. 

When discussing Pariasaurus recently I divided all Cotylo- 
sauria, after the removal of the very primitive Seymouria, into 
two groups, from the way in which they obtained a vertically 
standing quadrate, one process leading to the obliteration of the 
otic notch, the other to its exaggeration. 

To the first group belong the Captorhinids, Pariotichids, and 
Pantylids; to the second, Diadectids and Pariasaurids. 

Procolophon has an enormous otic notch, and of course falls 
into the second group. 

Procolophon and its allies are the latest of all Cotylosauria, 
occurring, so far as is definitely known, only in the Trias after 
the disappearance of all other types. In consideration of their 
age we should expect to find many advances in their structure. 
[Any study of paleontology shows that all allied animals tend, 
with mere passage of time, to change their structure in certain 
definite ways which are common to whole groups and occur 
independently in different lines of descent. These changes, 
which are usually independent of the adaptations of the animals 
in which they occur, take place at different rates in the distinct 
lines, and the sets of changes of different parts of the same 
animal are independent and may proceed at very different rates. 
Changes of this type I refer to as advances; they are quite 
different from specialisations, which themselves are of two kinds, 
adaptations to some special mode of life, and what are usually 
regarded as specific characters, 7.e. such differences between 
animals as form the typical Mendelian allelomorphs; it is very 
probable that these characters once established, perhaps as salta- 
tions, are very stable, and may persist in a recognisable form 
during a long series of advances. | 

The advances in the structure of Procolophon are :— 


1. The rounded occipital condyle. 
2. The vertical quadrate. 


A FOSSIL REPTILE. Ae 


3. The loss of the primitive connection between the squa- 
mosal and pterygoid. 

The loss of the ‘‘ supra-” and inter-temporal bones. 

The reduction of the lachrymal so that it no longer 
reaches the nostril. i 

The release of the distal end of the stapes from the 
quadrate. 

7. The short atlas and long axis. 

8. The long neck. 

9 


Ou 


Se 


c=) 
9. The extreme reduction of the plastron. 


10. The loss of the cleithrum. 

11. The loss of the supraglenoid and glenoid foramina. 

12. The loss of the screw-shaped glenoid cavity. 

13. The loss of the fifth distal carpal. 

14. The loss of the centralia tarsi and the fifth distal tarsal. 


The specialisations in the structure of Procolophon are :— 


1. The enlarged tabulare. 

The enlarged quadratojugal. 

The enlarged orbit. 

The dentition. 

The characteristic humerus. 

The non-ossification of the radiale. 
The three sacral vertebre. 


MI OU HE Oe bo 


No other Cotylosaurians approach Procolophon in the number 
of its advances, no other form has the lachrymal excluded from 
the nostril, and none other has completely lost the screw-shaped 
glenoid cavity. These differences, however, are not of such a 
character as to preclude the possibility of Procolophon having 
been derived from some known earlier form; they are merely 
a result of its lateness in time. 

The very large otic notch seems by itself to render any con- 
nection with the Captorhinide impossible; but of even greater 
importance is the difference in the brain-cases. Procolophon has 
the vestibule of the inner ear occupying the whole side-wall of 
the cranium, and in wide connection with the brain-cavity, exactly 
as ina Tortoise or Sphenodon. The Captorhinids, although the 
material is not sufficiently good for certainty, seem to have the 
vestibule placed very low down, as in a Therapsid; a difference 
of this character seems to me to render any idea of a close 
connection between the groups quite unbelievable. 

So little is known of Pariotichus and Pantylus that their 
affinities are quite uncertain. | 

Pariasaurus differs from Procolophon in its very long, low 
brain-cavity, with a bony separation of the inner ear from the 
cranial cavity. It is, of course, a very much less advanced type, 
retaining a concave occipital condyle, a trace of the connection 
of the squamosal and pterygoid, a lachrymal reaching the nostril, 


TAG. MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


a cleithrum, a screw-shaped glenoid cavity, and a fifth carpal. 
‘A blood relationship between Procolophon and Pariasaurus is 
more probable than one between Procolophon and Labidosaurus, 
despite the very different specialisation of the two types. 

Diadectes resembles Procolophon in its large otic notch, and 
apparently, to some extent, in the features of the cranial cavity. 
It differs, however, in the complete closure of the post-temporal 
fossee by a union of the widened supraoccipital with the tabulares 
and postparietals. In addition to these phylogenetically im- 
portant differences are many due to the very much less advanced 
nature of the type. 

Limnoscelis differs in the apparent obliteration of the otic 
notch and in its closed post-temporal fossz, in addition to the 
retention of many primitive structures. 

The work of Boulenger and v. Huene has shown the very 
great resemblance between Telerpeton and Procolophon, and I 
have been able to confirm their accounts on a magnificent new 
skeleton of the latter lent to me by Mr. Taylor of Llanbryde. 

Dr. Broom, when he first examined Procolophon, expressed 
his opinion that whilst technically a Cotylosaur it was really a 
primitive “ Diaptosaurian,” picking Paleohatteria as perhaps its 
nearest known relative. This choice was rather an unfortunate 
one, for it now seems almost certain that Paleohatteria is really 
a Therapsid. 

This suggestion was, in fact, really founded on such features as 
the digital formula and the presetice of abdominal ribs, which 
have proved to be common to all early reptiles. At the same 
time, the structure of the neural part of the skull does recall 
very strongly that of Sphenodon, or, so far as the interior of the 
cranial cavity is concerned, a Tortoise. 

As I believe very strongly in the value of this part of the 
skeleton as an indicator of affinities, I think it probable that 
Procolophon has some real relationship to the unknown group of 
Cotylosaurs from which these two very diverse forms of reptiles 
sprung. I have carefully examined the skeleton of Procolophon 
in this connection, but can find no other resemblances between 
it and the more modern reptiles which are not also common to 
many other early forms. In particular the glenoid cavity seems 
incapable of having given rise to that of reptiles with a single 
coracoidal element, being curiously advanced in a different 
direction. 


For the opportunity of collecting the material on which this 
paper is based, I am indebted to the assistance of the Percy 
Sladen Trustees, and to G. W. Crozier, Esq., of Donnybrook, 
W. Southey, Esq., of Tentergate, and P. Goosen, Esq., of Haslop 
Hill, S. Africa, without whose hospitality and interest I could 
have done nothing. 

The beautiful preparation of the male skeleton was made by 
Mr. R. Hall, of the British Museum. 


A FOSSIL REPTILE. 


EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. 


Puate I, 


Procolophon trigoniceps. 


Dorsal aspect of the nearly complete skeleton of a male (B.M. R. 4087). 


Collected by the avthor at Haslop Hill, Dist. Tarka, 8. Africa. 


Prater II. 
Procolophon trigoniceps. 


Ventral aspect of the specimen shown in PI. I. 


Prats III. 


Procolophon trigoniceps. 


The specimen shown in Pi. I., from the left side. 


Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. LI. 51 


pre oy Fi; 
Bd se ee es Be ht rss 5 a f 
te meee oe Lael eclieae 
AO he a ea ea MID Vicar dn Ead wan faye pervs ns 

FI ol dia ure SME, AR a scot eg 


- Pee: ¥ 7 
< so ! 
ae bs be Oger be 
4, OO ie ecu pene 
ivi 
‘ ‘ ahs Py 
: ; : = betta ie, 
4 yd of F : nea geleheel 
¥ 5 « 
“- 
k : 
= 4 
« © 
. We Five 
7 x . . Vers, ay; 
‘ 
2 cree 
: > SPN Wer 


a. : ope Sia 
PMA oct, ht ae : oes .\ 5 eu ae 
Bee 1 - Gib 


aah a i 


roan 


IP a5 Sa OIA MNWEAIETSIOING, Jet, INV, 


Bale & Danielsson, rtd 


2. 


MORMOSAURUS SEELEY. 


XOdFT SNHONSONVLIL 
prt “wosspfetueqd Ww sTeg 


-———— 


eee ee 


OA D9rap OG NG Aen are. VSS Tal ete wal 


ON MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES. 749 


2. The Deinocephalia, an Order of Mammal-like Reptiles. 
By D. M. 8. Watson, M.Sc., F.Z.8., Lecturer on 
Vertebrate Paleontology in University College, 
London. | 

[Received May 7, 1914: Read May 19, 1914. | 


(Plates IV., V.* & Text-figures 1-18.) 


INDEX. Page 
IGINGROGIECUNOS sedabo decoed soeBhe one coor once aacookee sen e OAT EC Racec EERE) 
Systematic : 

Mormosaurus seeleyi, gen. et SP. De ........cccccceeee vee ees 767 
Pnigalion oweni, gen. et sp. n. WES Ee See TOT: 
Lamiasaurus newtoni, gen. et sp. 1 Temes Ses SS ee ee erecey SOS, 
Structure : 
Tapinocephaloids : 
Skull, statement of material ................. ......0..... 750 
» Description ....... Gp Bone Ga Ra teecces soomepeny Goll 
Post-cranial skeleton, material ........... Basic spree cha LO 
S Description... .. 763 
Dentition SRB SSE Hae ARB iano coe SERS EEAGc HU ONR ACER LER Een ERT ame LOT A 
Titanosuchids : 
SkllctabeMmentT Onn abe ria) ieee ees en 7/GO 
6) IWESGRNAOM soo ccose Se stsnaasitects meee eed OO, 
Post-cranial skeleton, material irae OAT ch Te 773 
a ys IDESOMNUOD sciccocoobssascceesesocs 03 
General discussion : : 
Deuterosaurus a Tapinocephaloid ...... Bea seacrnone ane 
Rhophalodon compared with Titanosuchids ............. 774 
Affinities of Titanosuchus .. 774 
Relation of Deinocephalia ‘to other South African 
Therapsids ..... S Beak ded ender CAL 
Relation of Deinocephalia to Pelyco cosauria . es Lo 
The Auditory Arrangements of Therapsids ............... 779 
ANG WON SATO coneacdoo.saqvsoceocséosoncn ecdeseaddbndacnoskannena eufhers 


In 1851 Andrew Geddes Bain forwarded to the Geological 
Society of London a series of fossil bones from the River Gamka, 
Great Karroo, South Africa, which he recognised as different 
from all the others he had collected. 

These bones—a femur, humerus, ilium, vertebre, and portions 
of skull-bones—were the first fragments of a Deinocephalian to be 
found in South Africa. Many years before, however, the copper 
mines of the Ural Mountains had yielded fragmentary bones 
which were described by Kutorga; these are now known to 
belong to Deinocephalians. The first South African type to be 
described was TVapinocephalus atherstonei Owen, the snout of 
which was excellently figured and shortly described in the 
‘Catalogue of Fossil Reptiles of South Africa in the British 
Museum. In this work Owen described some vertebre and 
limb-bones belonging to Deinocephalia, but by a confusion in 
localities attributed many of them to Pariaswurus. Some years 
later Owen described the very fragmentary remains of Z%tano- 


suchus. 
* Wor explanation of the Plates see p. 786. 
| 51* 


750 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


The first account of a skull which was in any way complete 
was written by H. G. Seeley on material of Rhophalodon and 
Deuterosaurus from the Urals. Subsequently the same author 
described a good skull belonging to the South African Museum 
as Delphinognathus conocephalus. 

Except for purely systematic descriptions by Broom of four 
new genera and five new species founded on most unsatisfactory 
material, nothing further was published till, in 1909, this author 
gave a short and, as it has proved, somewhat inaccurate account 
of two skulls in the British Museum collected by Prof. Seeley. 
Subsequently Broom published a much better account of the 
type skull of Delphinognathus and brief descriptions of several 
new genera, one of which gave a complete knowledge of the 
lower jaw. 

Finally, Haughton has published a short account of a large 
skull referred, perhaps correctly, to Vapinocephalus atherstoner. 

The British Museum (Natural History) contains a large amount 
of Deinocephalian material in the form of more or less frag- 
mentary skulls and small associated sets of bones. From this it 
is possible to get some idea of the form and structure of a 
member of the group, and to give a nearly complete account of 
the morphology of the skull. 


The description of the Tapinocephaloid skull now given is 
founded on the following material :— 

I. R.1705. The type skull of Zapinocephalus atherstonei, 
represented by the right side of the occipital region up to the 
orbit, the left supraorbital region, and the anterior part of the 
face. 

Il. R. 3594. The skull already described by Broom as T'apino- 
cephalus atherstonet which really belongs to a new genus (Pl. IV. 
and text-figs. 1-4). 

This skull has lost the basioccipital condyle and the left 
quadrate region. It is very slightly distorted by pressure but 
otherwise is very well preserved, having been completely freed 
from a most intractable matrix by Mr. R. Hall, of the British 
Museum. When Dr. Broom described it, the whole outer surface 
was covered with a thin layer of matrix which has proved to be 
readily removable, so that all the sutures of the face are clearly 
and definitely shown; most of those figured by Broom are 
wrong. 

III. R. 3596 is a specimen in the Seeley collection from 
De Cypher, Gouph, consisting of a skull (text-figs. 5-7) from 
which the face in advance of the prefrontal had fallen away 
before fossilisation, the two dentaries, with some limb-bones and 
vertebre. Although also referred by Broom to Vapinocephalus, 
this skull is generically distinct not only from this type but also 
from R. 3594. 

TV. 49385 is a specimen, Q of T. Bain’s collection, from Warm 
Bad, Gouph, which consists of the posterior part of the skull, 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES, 751 


lacking most of the quadrates, and the anterior part of the face, 
which is only connected with it by documentary evidence (text- 
figs. 8, 9). This specimen also represents a new genus. 


Text-figure 1. 


Pr. Fr. PR. FR. 


Mormosaurus seeleyi, gen. et sp. n. 


R. 3594 B.M.N.H. Type-skull. Right lateral aspect*, X + 

J., Jugal; Lac., Lachrymal; Mx., Maxilla; Na., Nasal; P.O., Postorbital; Pr. 
Pterygoid; Pr.FR., Postfrontal; Pr.FR., Prefrontal; P.Mx., Premaxilla; 
Qu., Quadrate; Qu.J., Quadratojugal; S.Mx., Septomaxilla; Sq., Squa- 
mosal; Tas., Tabulare. 


Although these skulls belong to four different genera, they 
agree so closely in their fundamental architecture that I have 
used them all in the following description, which is, however, 
founded as far as possible on R. 3594, from which the account 
of the face and palate are almost wholly drawn. 

[This method I hold to be perfectly legitimate ; it is as if we 
were describing the characteristic structure of a mammal’s skull 
from incomplete but complementary skulls of a bear, a dog, and 
a cat. 

ite Tapinocephaloid skull (text-figs. 1-9) has an extraordinarily 
large and massive cranial portion beside which the often sharply 
marked off face seems rather feeble. The whole of the bones 
on the dorsal surface of the postorbital region fuse together and 
thicken probably throughout the animal’s life, until as much as 


%* Skulls from the Karroo of South Africa are usually distorted; in many cases 
this is of the nature of a simple sheer, which is very easily corrected in making 
drawings. In the figures of this paper this correction has been made, and each side 
is restored by comparison with the other. Nothing is introduced into them without 
clear evidence on at least one side. All the figures are projections and not perspective 
drawings. 


752 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


fifteen centimetres of solid finely cancellar bone may be formed 
over the brain. The bones of the face, although they may be two 
centimetres thick, never fuse, and were readily disarticulated in 
the adult skull. 


Text-figure 2. 


IL [Pain 


| si 
UA \\ EEA 


Pep Ex: 
Mormosaurus seeleyi. Dorsal aspect of the type-skull, X 7. 


Reference-letters as before, with :—Fr., Frontal; I.Par., Interparietal ; 
Par., Parietal. 


The whole occipital and otic region of the skull (text-figs. 3, 7) 
has fused into a mass of bone in which no sutures are visible in 
the material at my disposal. On the whole this region is very like 
the corresponding part of Lystrosawrus which I have already 
described. It forms a thick, vertically placed plate of bone 
pierced through the middle by the relatively small brain-cavity. 
This is throughout higher than wide, and has not been cleaned in 
any specimens; fractures, however, show that it possessed the 
characteristic Therapsid character of having the large opening to 
the vestibule placed very low down in the skull. The floor of 
the brain-cavity rises considerably towards the front. 

The basioccipital condyle (text-figs. 5, 4, 7) is single, large, and 
slightly pedunculate (R. 3596); it has a slight median depression 
representing the notochordal pit. Below the condyle, the basi- 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES. 753 


occipital forms a vertical area, which may be very high and wide 
(text-fig. 7) (R. 3596) or comparatively small. The sides of this 
area must be formed by the paroccipitals for some distance, as 
the fenestre ovales lie at the sides well below the condyle. The 
corresponding flat area in front is formed by the basisphenoid. 
There are no distinct tubera basisphenoidalia, or basipterygoid 
processes, but the posterior ends of the pterygoids articulate and 
indeed fuse with the lower margin of the vertical area. From 


Text-figure 3. 


} 


(Ce fi i ’ ip Wr SQ. 
VS Borin Dy * Se 


Mormosaurus seeleyi. Posterior view of the type-skull, x 4. 


Reference-letters as before, with :—B.Oc., Basioccipital; Par.Oc., Paroccipital ; 
P.T.F., Post-temporal fossa; Sr., Stapes. 


between them the narrow parasphenoid rises as a vertical plate, 
separated from much of the front of the basisphenoid by the deep, 
short notch which is the pituitary fossa. This fossa is bounded 
laterally by very low ridges which run upwards on the vertical 
anterior face of the basisphenoid until they terminate in low pro- 
cesses which are the processi anteriores prootici. The prootic of 
course contributes to the fenestra ovalis, above which it is 
perforated by the aqueeductus fallopii for the VIIth nerve. 

The otic and supraoccipital regions of the skull are in contact 
with the following bones :— 

The upper outer corner of the posterior face of the large 
paroccipital process with the tabulare. 

The outer end and front face of the paroccipital process with the 
squamosal. 

The lower part of the front face of the paroccipital process with 
the quadrate. 

The posterior surface of the supraoccipital region is covered by . 
the interparietal and tabulares. Its upper margin (and part of 
the front face?) by the parietal (and postorbital 2). 


754 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


The parasphenoid (text-fig. 9, Par.Sp.), as has been described 
above, rises from the front face of the basisphenoid. It is very 
short antero-posteriorly and rises nearly vertically in the skull 
about to the level of the anterior inferior process of the prootic ; 
its upper end is then split and receives the lower end of the 
ethmoid. 

The ethmoid is a remarkable bone extremely like that of 
Endothiodon. 

Its lower border is clasped by the split upper edge of the 
parasphenoid, from which it rises as a narrow vertical plate; in 
front this 1s continued to the roof of the skull, but behind it 


Text-figure 4. 


Mormosaurus seeleyi. Palatal aspect of the type-skull, x +. 


Reference-letters as before, with :—Pr.V., Prevomer; Pat., Palatine ; 
Tr., Transverse boue. 


splits into two branches which rise to the frontals and leave 
between them a small cavity for the olfactory lobes of the brain. 
The nasal nerves leave by a pair of openings between the median 
septal part of the ethmoid and the rest of that bone. The 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES. 755 


ethmoid is received in a groove on the lower surface of the 
frontals (and parietals?) and extends so far backwards that it 
nearly, if not quite, touches the supraoccipital. 

The interparietal (I. Pax.) is a flat bone entirely on the back of 
the skull, where it overlaps the supraoccipital below and the tabu- 
lares at the sides. The rest of its front face is in contact with 
the hinder ends of the greatly thickened parietals. 

The tabulare (TaB.) is a large bone forming a good deal of the 
occipital surface. It is wedged in between the postorbital and 
interparietal (R. 3594), and passes outwards above the post- 
temporal fossa to touch the outer end of the paroccipital. The 
outer part of its front face is in contact with the squamosal, and 
its thick outer border joims with this bone to make a distinct 
auditory meatus. 


Text-figure 5. 


r, 79> 


ul! 


Bk 


te )-au. 


Prigation oweni, gen. et sp. n. 
Right lateral aspect of the type-skull. R. 3596 B.M.N.H. X }. 


Reterence-letters as before. 


The squamosal (S@.) is a large bone which has a powerful arti- 
culation with the end of the paroccipital process; above the arti- 
culation a strong ramus runs inwards along the front face of the 
tabulare to overlap the postorbital. Immediately to the outside 
of its articulation with the paroccipital process the bone overlaps 
the upper end and some of the posterior surface of the quadrate. 
Finally, the bone is completed by a powerful ramus which forms 
part of the outer wall of the skull, articulating with the lateral 
border of the quadrate and ending in suture with the quadrato- 
jugal, jugal, and postorbital. 

None of the specimens shows clearly all the sutures bounding 


756 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


the parietal, but it is certain that the two bones met in a median 
suture which is only interrupted by the long cylindrical tunnel 
which forms the large pineal foramen. 

The posterior border of the bone is covered by the interparietal. 
Anteriorly it must meet the frontal, but the suture is never 
visible. The lateral border is completely covered by the post- 
orbital. 

The excessive thickness of the bones makes them come into 
contact with the upper border and anterior face of the supra- 
occipital. 

The postorbital (P.O.) is a large and very remarkable bone. 
It forms the massive bar behind the orbit, and has a very long 
suture with the squamosal in the zygomatic arch below the 
temporal fossa. 

Above the orbit in R. 3594 it meets the small post-frontal, but 
in that specimen on its lower surface (on the right side) it can 
be distinctly seen to join the prefrontal in a long suture running 
inwards nearly to the middle line. The extremely thick and 
massive bone then meets the parietal and covers the whole of its 
outer surface, sending out a process in contact with the front face 
of the interparietal and tabulare to be finally covered by the tip 
of the parietal ramus of the squamosal, so that the temporal fossa 
is entirely bounded by these two bones. 

The sutures between the postorbital, frontal, and prefrontal 
are not visible on the outside of the skull. 

The postfrontal (Pr.FR.) is a very small bone forming a small 
part of the orbital margin and entirely surrounded by the 
prefrontal and postorbital (R. 3594). 

The prefrontal (Pr.FR.) is a very massive bone forming the 
front upper quadrant of the orbital margin. On its ventral 
surface it has a long suture with the postorbital and likewise 
joins the postfrontal, frontal, nasal, and lachrymal. 

The lachrymal (Lac.) (R. 3594) is a small bone forming the 
front of the orbit and articulating with the prefrontal, nasal, 
maxilla, and jugal. There is no lachrymal foramen. 

The nasal (Na.) (R. 3594) is a large bone which plays a great 
part in the structure of the face. The two bones are in contact 
in the middle line posteriorly, where they are very thick, but their 
thinner anterior portions are separated by the very long internarial 
processes of the premaxille. The outer border of the nasal has a 
suture with the prefrontal, lachrymal, maxilla, and septomaxilla, 
and is entirely excluded from the nostril by the latter bone. 
The visceral surface of each nasal has a sharp ridge, the two 
together forming a groove for the olfactory nerves. 

The premaxilla (P.Mx.) of R. 3594 is a very remarkable bone. 
It has a suture with its fellow, with which it forms the rounded 
extremity of the snout. Its tooth-bearing margin is short and 
wide, and its inner edge forms part of the anterior border of the 
posterior naris. Medial to this opening it sends back a process 
along the upper surface of the prevomer. The dorsal surface of 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES, 757 


this process forms a floor to the anterior part of the nasal cavity, 
and its outer border is in contact with the septomaxilla. The 
outer side of the premaxilla has a powerful articulation with 
the maxilla, In R. 3594 the facial part of the bone is continued 
upwards by a long and slender internarial process which separates 
the nasals for a great distance. 


Text-figure 6. 


Pnigalion oweni. Type-skull, dorsal aspect, X 2. 


The maxilla (Mx.) is a bone with few remarkable features; in 
front it joins the premaxilla, and thence backwards forms a 
large area of the face. It is completely excluded from the border 
of the external naris by the septomaxilla, with which in R. 3594 it 
has a long suture. In this specimen it then has a short contact 
with the nasal and is finally terminated by sutures with the 
lachrymal and jugal. On the palate the maxilla is only repre- 
sented by its wide tooth-bearing edge and forms part of the 
border of the choana; for the rest of its length it is in contact 
with the palatine and transverse bones. 

The septomaxilla (S.Mx.) is a variable bone in Tapinocepha- 
loids. In R. 3594 it has an internarial part which unites by 
suture with the premaxilla to form a floor to the nasal cavity ; 
it then sends back a large facial part which forms the whole of 
the posterior border of the nostril and separates the nasal and 


158 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


maxilla for a long distance; it is in contact with the maxilla 
throughout its length, but is separated from the nasal just behind 
the nostril by a foramen about a centimetre long and *5 cm. wide. 

In 49385 the septomaxilla is entirely within the nostril, in 
which it forms an irregular curved plate, having a suture with the 
premaxilla and forming a rudimentary floor to the nasal cavity. 
Tts outer border is in contact with the maxilla except for a small 
foramen of irregular shape (text-figs. 1, 2). 

The jugal (J.) is a comparatively small bone which forms about 
a quarter of the orbital margin : in front 1t terminates in sutures 
with the lachrymal and maxilla, and on its inner surface with the 
transverse bone. Behind the orbit it has a suture with the 
quadratojugal, squamosal, and postorbital. 

The quadratojugal (Qu.J.) is a small bone on the side of the 
skull; its end covers the outer border of the quadrate, from which 
it is not separated by a foramen quadrati. Above it touches the 
squamosal and in front the jugal. 


Text-figure 7. 


—— 
—— 


\\ 


NN 


Pnigalion oweni. Type-skull, posterior aspect, X ¢- 


Reference-letters as before. 


The quadrate (Qu.) is a large bone whose lower border forms 
the double condyle for the lower jaw; above this it rises in the 
skull with its outer edge connected with the quadratojugal and 
squamosal. The upper end of the bone and some of its hinder 
surface is overlapped by the squamosal. . 

Passing inwards from the body of the bone is a powerful 
pterygoid ramus, which overlaps from the squamosal on to the 
front face of the paroccipital process. Much of the rest of the 
posterior face of this ramus is overlapped by the pterygoid. 
Some distance above the condyle, where the pterygoid ramus joins 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES, 759 


the body of the quadrate, there is a step which may (R. 3596) be 
for the outer end of the extremely massive stapes. 

The posterior end of the pterygoid is lightly applied to and 
probably usually fused with the lower end of the basisphenoid at 
the side of the parasphenoid. From the side of the bone in this 
region (49385) a small process is given off which curves round so 
as to shield the front of the fenestra ovalis. From this process a 
slender rod rises very high in the skull with its posterior edge 
nearly in contact with the front of the prootic: although not 
separated by visible suture it is probable that this bone is the 
epipterygoid. In R. 3594 there is a small fragment in contact 
with the parietal in the region of the hinder end of the ethmoid 
which may be the upper end of this bone. 

From its articulation with the basiphenoid the pterygoid passes 
forwards and outwards; the outer wing is the quadrate ramus, 
which on account of the remarkable form of the skull and the 
forward throw of the quadrate, forms a nearly flat, horizontally 
placed sheet of bone overlapping the posterior surface of the 
quadrate. In front of this the pterygoid narrows and then rather 
suddenly widens and passes outwards to the transverse bone. 
Much of the anterior border is in contact with the palatine in 
a straight suture, but there is in 49385 a small medial process 
which extends forwards to touch the prevomer. 

The dorsal surface of the anterior part of the pterygoid is 
produced into a high flange rising in contact with its fellow 
(with which it may be fused, 49385) as a median septum in the 
facial part of the skull. 

The transverse bone (TR.) is separated from the pterygoid by 
incomplete but quite definite and certain sutures on both sides 
of R. 3594. It unites with the pterygoid to form a low flange 
against the side of the lower jaw, and runs outwards, having a 
long suture with the palatine in front to the maxilla and jugal. 
Where the maxilla, palatine, and transverse meet there is 
apparently a very small suborbital fossa only about °5 em. in 
diameter. 

The palatine (PAt.) is a bone of medium size which has a suture 
with the transverse and pterygoid posteriorly, with the pterygoid 
and prevomer medially; its anterior border forms a good deal of 
the posterior naris and its outer edge has a long suture with the 
maxilla. 

The prevomer (PR.V.) is a rather remarkable bone. Behind it 
has a suture with the palatine, for some distance its medial surface 
is separated from that of its fellow by the thin vertical plate made 
by the pterygoids. Further forward the two bones meet in the 
middle line, and from this point forwards their upper surface isto a 
variable extent overlapped by special processes of the premaxille. 
The outer edge of the prevomer forms the whole of the inner 
margin of the posterior naris. From the upper margin of the 
bone a thin flange rises which leans inwards till its upper edge 
touches that of the septum formed by the pterygoids. This flange 


760 MR, D. M. 8S. WATSON ON 


gradually declines in height, but in R. 3594 separates the sub- 
narial process of the premaxille for some distance. _ 

In 49385 the prevomer underlies the premaxille to the 
posterior edge of the alveoli. 


Text-figure 8. 


A 


. * \ ‘ q \ 
AW" 
ll . 


os 


/ J // y 
1) Wn iY Cie 
ZF ys 


B 


Lamiasaurus newtoni, gen. et sp. n. 
A. Right lateral aspect of the type-skull, x 4. B.M.N.H. 49385. 


. There is no evidence of the relative position of the back of the skull and the snout. 
B. Posterior aspect of the type-skull, x 4. 
C. Anterior part of the palate of the type-skull, <2. 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES. 761 


The stapes (St.) in all Deinocephalia is a massive rod with few 
features; in 49385 it apparently fuses with the posterior lip of 
the fenestra ovalis. In R. 3596 it is of extraordinary size; the 
distal end, which is directly and powerfully articulated with the 
quadrate, being nearly 5 centimetres wide and 2 thick. It is not 
perforated for a stapedial artery. 


Text-figure 9. 


—— 
= 
ta 


PAR 


—— S 


Type-skull of Lamiasaurus newtoni, external aspect of the bones of 
the brain-case. 
Reference-letters as before, with :—Eru., Ethmoid; E.Pr., Epipterygoid; Par.Sp., 
Parasphenoid; Prr., Pituitary fossa; VII., 1-foramen fallopii. 


The Tapinocephaloid lower jaw is represented in the British 
Museum only by the two dentaries of R. 3596 (text-fig. 16, A); 
as Dr. Broom has recently published an account of the jaw this 
lack is of little importance. 


762 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


The post-cranial skeleton of Tapinocephaloids is represented by 
the following material :— 

The type of Tapinocephalus atherstonei :—The matrix of this 
specimen isa dark blue grey limestone full of small lamellibranchs ; 
these are the only bones in the collection in such a matrix. 

The fragmentary skull, two nearly complete and several other 
dorsal vertebree, and some caudals. 

The type of Phocosawrus Seeley :—A sacrum and ten imperfect 
dorsal vertebrae. The two ilia and pubes, one ischium, two im- 
perfect femora, a tibia, two fragmentary scapule, and pre- 
coracoids, one coracoid, two humeri, and one ulna. 

The only fragment of skull associated with this is a bit of 
palate showing part of the two pterygoids and a part of the 
palatine. This agrees exactly with R. 3594, but is about half as 
large again. 


Text-figure 10. 


- = iy } 


A dorsal vertebra of the type-specimen of Tapinocephalus 
atherstonei Owen, X}- 


A. Anterior aspect. | B. Lateral aspect. 
R. 1706 B.M.N.H. 


Associated with the skull R. 3596 are several dorsal centra and 
one arch, three femora, all extremely similar, a tibia, and a 
humerus and atlantal intercentrum. 

The atlas and axis of Moschops capensis have been described 
and figured by Broom, Bull. American Mus. Nat. Hist. vol. xxxiii. 
p. 139, fig. 5. 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES. 763 

The anterior vertebre are not well represented in the Museum 
collection, but have short deeply concave centra and massive 
arches with short transverse processes ; the articular facet for the 
rib seems to be continuous and to be carried on the arch and 


Text-figure 11. 


7 PINS 
| GN 
If} 


f a 


ha = 
i 
/ 


| 


Nae 


\\ 


Right scapula, coracoid and precoracoid of the type-specimen of Phocosaurus 
megischion Seeley, X 3- 
The part of the scapula between the lines which cross it is restored. It is known 
from the evidence of other specimens that the length is approximately corvect. 
C., Coracoid; P.C., Precoracoid; Sc., Scapula. 


Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. LIT. 52 


764 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


centrum equally (text-fig. 10). The later dorsals have centra like 
those of the anterior vertebre, but the rib-facet is high up and 
near the front border. The arches are high and massiveand carry 
long transverse processes directed nearly horizontally. The zyga- 
pophysial articulations are flat and inclined to one another and 
the spines not very high. 

The sacrum of Phocosaurus is composed of four vertebrae whose 
centra are fused. The sacral ribs are articulated with both 
centrum and arch; those of the anterior two vertebre are very 
massive and of about the same size, the other two are much 
smaller. One interesting feature is that the distal ends of the 
anterior sacral ribs meet and fuse before they reach the ilium. 


Text-figure 12. 


Right humerus of the type of Pnigalion oweni, X +. 


The caudal vertebre are very short, and the series belonging to 
the type of Tapinocephalus seems to taper rapidly, so that the 
tail was undoubtedly short. 

The shoulder-girdle of Tapinocephaloids seems to be very large 
and massive in comparison with the skull. 

The scapula (Sc., text-fig. 11) is represented by its well-preserved 
lower and upper ends in Phocosaurus and by an isolated bone 
which gives the length. It has a flat blade with no indication of 
an acromial process. The lower end has a long, straight face for 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES. 765 


articulation with the precoracoid. Behind this it thickens and 
forms the upper part of a glenoid cavity which looks outwards 
and slightly backwards. 

The precoracoid (P.C., text-fig. 11) is a very large bone arti- 
culating by a long suture with the scapula and bearing a long 
articular face for the coracoid. It is pierced by a foramen which 
opens into a distinct pit on the visceral surface. The coracoid 
(C., text-fig. 11) is a large bone which has a long surface for 
contact with the precoracoid, and whose upper anterior corner 
articulates with the scapula. Behind this contact it forms the 
lower portion of the glenoid cavity, which is entirely formed by 
the scapula and coracoid. 


Text-figure 13. 


Y <K ( 
NX 
aN 


‘ ys : \ 
BW Nana 


| 


Sacrum and pelvis of the type-specimen of Phocosaurus megischion Seeley ; 
seen obliquely from front. + nat. size. 


Iz., [lium ; Is., Ischium; Pu., Pubis; 8., Sacrum. 


The humerus (text-fig. ]2) is a very massive bone with expanded 
ends which are in planes at a considerable angle to one another. 
The head is cylindrical and directly continuous with the enormous 
deltoid crest, which, after extending more than halfway to the 
distal end of the bone, suddenly subsides into the shaft. The 

52* 


766 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


shaft is relatively slender but very short, and soon expands into 
the broad distal end. This is furnished with two articulating 
faces: one almost entirely represented by a low knob on the 
anterior face of the bone for the radius, the other on the end for 
the sigmoidal fossa of the ulna. There is a large entepicondyle, 
and a foramen piercing the shaft just at the end of the deltoid 
crest. 

The ulna is a short massive bone, with a pronounced olecranon 
process and a facet for the head of the radius. 

The pelvis of Phocosawrus (text-fig. 13) has already been de- 
scribed by Seeley, and its general character will be best under- 
stood from the figures of this paper. The interesting features 
are the small pubic foramen, the absence of any obturator foramen, 
and the enormous size of the acetabulum. 

The four sacral ribs articulate with the inner surface by large 
facets, which are continuous with one another. 


Text-figure 14. 


Left femur of the type of Prigalion oweni, X1. R. 3596. 


The femur (text-fig. 14) is a very large bone with a rounded 
head and long and large external trochanteric ridge, which slowly 
subsides on to the shaft. The lower end is provided with two 
condyles, which are only obscurely separated from one another. 
The bone as a whole is flattened dorso-ventrally. 

The tibia is a bone with very few features ; it has an expanded 
head and a short, thick shaft. 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES. 767 


The restoration of the skeleton (text-fig. 15) founded on all this 
material gives one an idea, which is probably generally correct, of 
the habit of the group. The striking features are the small head 
and very massive limb-girdles. Phocosaurus is relatively more 
heavily built than “ Pariasaurus” baine. 


Text-figure 15. 


Restoration of the skeleton of a Tapinocephaloid. 


Skull, humerus, femur, and tibia from the type of Pnigalion oweni ; 
other bones from the type of Phocosaurus. 


Dentition and Systematics of Tapinocephaloids. 


The type-specimen of TZapinocephalus atherstoner has been 
ground down so as to show many sections of uncut tooth-crowns 
and of the roots of functional teeth, Judging from these the 
teeth are similar all round the upper jaw, there being no enlarged 
canine. 

The teeth-crowns, as shown by the series of sections which cut 
them at many levels, consist of a sharp upstanding cusp, the outer 
side of which is rounded and the inner side flattened ; from the 
lower border of this cusp the crown is continued inwards on a 
large shallowly concave area surrounded by ridges descending from 
the sides of the anterior cusp ; these seem to be smooth, and the 
outer is the larger. An isolated tooth (text-fig. 16, B) in the 
Museum collection seems to agree with the tooth-crown restored 
from the sections shown in this type-specimen. 


R. 3594, which may be called 


Mormosaurus seeleyi, gen. et. sp. n. (Pl. IV.), 


has an extremely feeble dentition, which is quite uniform 
throughout so far as can be judged from the usually imperfect 
crowns and alveoli. Each tooth seems to consist solely of a cusp 
which is oval in section and has a coarsely serrated edge. 


R. 3596 may be called 


Prigalion owent, gen. et sp. n. 


The dentition of the upper jaw is not known, but there is no 
sign of an enlarged canine in the dentary. The teeth seem to 
be similar all round the mouth. Each tooth consists of a high 


768 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


outer cusp with a rounded external surface and a deep groove 
down its inner side. All round the inner side and front and 
back of this cusp rises a strong cingulum, whose margin is raised 
and serrated so as to form a cup in the middle of the crown. 


Text-figure 16. 


ii 


ih 


JN 
if F Pl 


Deinocephalian teeth. 


A. Right dentary of type-specimen of Pnigalion oweni, X 5. 
B. Tapinocephalus?, X 3. 
C. Series of teeth of one individual of unknown genus, X 1. 


No. 49585 may be called 


Lamiasaurus newton, gen. et sp. n. 


The dentition of the upper jaw consists of four large incisors 
represented only by their alveoli, which are oval in shape and 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES. 769 


suggest that the teeth may have been like those of Dewtero- 
SMUTUS. 

There is a single canine, which is large, strongly inclined 
forwards, and circular in section. Behind this there are three 
molars, shown in transverse section to be circular and relatively 
small; it is probable that there was one more only. 

One important difference between this type and the preceding 
three is that whilst they all have very numerous replacing teeth, 
which are not in the same stage and were thrust up indefinitely 
like those of a crocodile, in Lamiasaurus there is no trace of 
successional teeth. 

The other types of South African Tapinocephaloids which have 
been described are :— 

Delphinognathus conocephalus, a much smaller form without 
large canines, of which the details of the dentition are not 
known. 

Moschops capensis, also a small form with no canines and with 
no details of the dentition. 

Taurops macrodon, a large form apparently with teeth some- 
what like those of Tapinocephalus, but not sufficiently described 
or figured to be definitely identified at present. 

Eccasaurus priscus, founded on a humerus of rather unusual 
type, to which is referred a tooth of the general plan of Tapino- 
cephalus but of a narrower oval form and more cuspidate. 

Moschognathus whaitsi, founded on a figured lower jaw which, 
as it seems to contain no teeth, is indeterminable. 


The Titanosuchid branch of the Deinocephalia is represented by 
the following skull-material in the British Museum (Natural 
History) :— 

An imperfect skull (Pl. V., & text-figs. 17, 18) consisting of 
the dorsal surface from behind the nostrils to the back, with the 
squamosals and part of the zygomatic arch; and a block which 
has a rather poor fit with the upper part, but contains a good 
deal of the maxilla and prevomers and a small fragment of the 
palatine. 

This specimen (R. 3595) was collected by Prof. Seeley at 
Tamboer Fontein. The only other skull-materials I have used 
are the premaxille of the type-specimen (49370), which itself 
consists of the associated remains of two individuals of identically 
the same size. The maxille of these agree exactly, so far as can 
be seen, with that of the specimen mentioned above. 

Nothing is known of the basicranial part of the skull, but the 
supraoccipital above the post-temporal fossz is present in the 
Tamboer specimen. It is a flat wide plate with rather large post- 
temporal fossze bounding it below, and the upper part of the 
deep and narrow brain-cavity impressed on its lower surface. Its 
posterior surface is overlapped by the interparieta 1 and tabulares, 
and its upper edge is in contact and perhaps fused with the 
parietals. 


770 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


A small part of the ethmoid remains in contact with the under 
surface of the frontals, and is a small bone with a very small cavity 
for the olfactory lobes of the brain. 

The interparietal (I. Par., text-fig. 17) is a very large vertically 
placed plate on the back of the skull. Its anterior face is in con- 
tact with the upper part of the supraoccipital and the posterior 
ends of the parietals. Laterally it overlaps the parietal rami of 
the postorbital and squamosal and the tabulare. 


Text-figure 17. 


Titanosuchus. Dorsal aspect of skull. Premaxille from type. 
The remainder from R. 3595 B.M.N.H. x2. 
P.O., Postorbital; Sq., Squamosal; I.Par., Interparietal; Tas., Tabulare. 


The tabulare (Tas., text-figs. 17 & 18 B) is a large bone, 
whose medial border is covered by the interparietal and whose 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES, Hapah 


anterior face has a contact with the supraoccipital, postorbital, 
and squamosal. Its lower border forms the upper side of the 
post-temporal fossa, and its outer edge is thickened and with the 
squamosal forms a long, vertically placed auditory groove, 

The squamosal (S8q., text-fig. 17) is only incompletely preserved ; 
as shown it has a parietal ramus, which covers much of the front 
face of the tabulare and extends inwards to overlap the posterior 
end of the postorbital. With the tabulare it forms the auditory 
groove on the postero-lateral corner of the skull, and beyond this 
sends forwards a massive zygomatic part on the outer surface of 
the skull. 


Text-figure 18. 


A. Titanosuchus. Wateral aspect of the same specimen as text-fig. 17. 
B. Titanosuchus. Posterior aspect of skull. B.M.N.H. X ¢- 
I.Par., Interparietal; Tas., Tabulare. 


Except for the suture with its fellow and the frontal, the 
parietal is completely shown. It is a small bone in contact with 
its fellow except for the pineal foramen, which is a round hole. 
The two bones form a special little projection raising the opening 
more than a centimetre above the general line of the surrounding 
bone. 


(CU MR. D. M. 8S. WATSON ON 


The sutures surrounding the postorbital (P.O.) are all visible, 
but that with the postfrontal only on the ventral surface. The bone 
forms a massive sheet at the back of the orbit, and forms the 
hinder part of the extraordinary mass of bone which overhangs 
it; it sends back a powerful process along the side of the parietal, 
which forms the inner border of the temporal fossa, and thence 
runs outwards along the front face of the tabulare to be covered 
by the squamosal. 

The sutures separating the postfrontal from the postorbital and 
prefrontal are only visible on the under surface; they are straight 
and run inwards for a very long distance with the postfrontal as 
a narrow strip between them. It probably forms a good deal of 
the knob above the orbit. 

The sutures between the prefrontal and lachrymal ete. are not 
visible, but on the under surface it seems that the nasals are 
narrow bones, each carrying a sharp-edged rib, so as to form a 
groove on the lower surface. 

At the anterior end the specimen shows on the outer surface 
traces of the sutures between the internarial processes of the pre- 
maxillz and the nasals. It is evident that they were very long. 

The premaxille known from the type-specimen have a flat facial 
surface and rather broad internarial processes, the nares being on 
the dorsal surface some distance behind the snout. 

The palatal surface of the premaxilla is entirely formed by its 
tooth-bearing edge, and the lateral border is in contact with the 
maxilla. 

The maxilla is a large bone with a great facial expansion. 
Its palatal exposure is solely formed by its dentigerous margin, and 
it is in contact with the palatine. Thereare large prevomers with 
a long interchoanal bar, the dorsal surface of which rises into a 
high thin flange. Of the quadrate only the articular edge is 
known, which gives no indication of its size. 

The type-specimen of 7itanosuchus ferox gives many bones of 
the lower jaw, all disarticulated. The articular is a small bone 
with a cotylus for the quadrate condyle, which apparently faces 
very nearly backwards. The postarticular part is only repre- 
sented by a small process on the lower side of the bone. The 
anterior part rapidly narrows and finishes in a point. There 
are well-marked articulating surfaces for the prearticular and 
surangular, The angular is flat, and has a deep and very narrow 
notch covered with a reflected lamina exactly as in a Gorgo- 
nopsid. The dentary is a very massive bone, with a deep groove 
on its inner surface for the prearticular, surangular, and angular 
The bone seems to give evidence that there was no freely project- 
ing coronoid process. One interesting feature is that there is a 
very shallow, but quite definite, step in the dentigerous margin 
behind the canine, as in Gorgonopsids, but, of course, relatively 
very much smaller. 

The lower surface of the dentary has a broad surface for the 
splenial, which must have formed the whole of the lower border of 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES. WHS 


the anterior part of the jaw, and had a large symphysis with its 
fellow. 

The post-cranial skeleton of Titanosuchids is represented by 
two series of bones :— 

The type-specimen of Zitanosuchus ferox (two individuals) : 
neural arch and intercentrum of atlas, vertebree, scapule, cora- 
coid, cleithra, clavicle, three humeri, femur, and fibula. 

A series of associated bones of another genus, comprising 
vertebre, ribs, ilium, humerus, femora, tibia, and skull-fragments. 

The atlantal neural arch is absolutely identical with that of 
the Dicynodont Aannemeyeria, as is the intercentrum. They 
give evidence that the whole ‘complex was similar to that of 
M oschops, as described by Broom. 

The vertebre of 7itanosuchus are all extremely unsatisfactory, 
but seem to be generally similar to those of Tapinocephaloids, 
with longer neural spines and shorter transverse processes ; it is 
just possible that the capitulum and tuberculum were connected 
by a very thin web. 

The other specimen has very high neural spines. 

Certain fragments of bone belonging to the type of Titano- 
suchus suggest the presence of relatively feeble abdominal ribs. 

The scapule are very much weather ed, but are extremely large 
and massive bones, giving no evidence of an acromion. 

The coracoid is essentially identical with that of the Tapino- 
cephaloids, and shows clearly that the precoracoid was excluded 
from the glenoid cavity. 

The cleithrum is a fine bone, nearly 8 centimetres wide and 
2 thick; it has an articular facet for the front edge of the scapula. 

What is almost certainly the lower end of the clavicle is 
represented by an unsymmetrical sheet of bone about 20 em. by 
30 em., which has the root of a powerful process arising from one 
surface just within the edge. There is no other bone in the 
skeleton it can possibly be, and, if it is correctly determined, the 
interclavicle must have Reon an extraordinary wide flat sheet. 

The humerus as figured by Seeley, Phil. Trans. 180 B, pl. xx 
figs. 1 & 2, gives a rather misleading idea of the bone. Tt is in 
essentials much like that of the Tapinocephaloids, but differs in 
its relatively narrower lower end, in having the facet for the 
head of the radius still more on the front of the bone, and the 
two openings of the entepicondylar foramen on the same side of 
the shaft. Finally, there is a small ectepicondylar foramen. 

A single ulnare is present in the material; it is a rather small 
but thick bone with a notch in one border, ‘forming part of the 
ordinary foramen between the ulnare and the intermedium. 

The ilium is very incomplete, but is a short bone, apparently 
similar to that of the Tapinocephaloids. 

The femur differs from that of the Tapinocephaloids in its 
relative slenderness and the lesser size of the trochanter. 

The tibia does not differ essentially from that of Tapino- 
cephaloids. 


U4 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


General Discussion. 


That the animals whose structure I have discussed under the 
heading of Tapinocephaloids are all closely allied admits of no 
discussion, and is self-evident in every detail of their structure. 

To the same group belongs the Russian type Dewterosaurus. 
As shown clearly by Eichwald’s figures, the dentition is absolutely 
characteristic, the powerful incisors which interlock are struc- 
turally identical with those of Zapinecephalus. The enlarged 
canine so clearly shown in his figures occurs in the remarkable 
type Lamiasaurus which I have described above, and the presence 
of only a single molar is a variation of slight importance. The 
skull figured by Prof. Seeley has all the characteristic features 
of the group, the broad zygomatic arch with the postorbital 
obviously widely meeting the squamosal and the covering of the 
side of the parietal by the postorbital (as shown and lettered 
““post-frontal ” in Seeley’s figure) being identical with the struc- 
tures in the South African forms. Even the slight difference in 
the narrowness of the intertemporal bar and the erest on the 
parietals can be matched in a fragment from South Africa in 
the British Museum. Seeley’s figure also seems to show that 
there was the very characteristic vertical area of basioccipital 
below the condyle and the large quadrate characteristic of the 
group. 

The Russian type Rhophalodon and that described by Twelve- 
trees as Cliorhizodon orenbergensis (R. 4077), which is perhaps 
generically identical with the previously deseribed Deinosaurus, 
are apparently closely allied to Vitanosuchus. Cliorhizodon (at any 
rate, as shown by the beautifully preserved type-specimen in the 
British Museum) is extraordinarily like a small Zitanosuchus, 
as was, in fact, recognised in the original description. ‘There is 
nothing in the whole structure of the skull to prohibit a 
connection. 

Whether Zitanosuchus is really closely allied to the Tapino- 
cephaloids, or whether it is a specialised Gorgonopsid, as Broom 
now believes, is perhaps more doubtful. It resembles the Tapino- 
cephaloids in the extraordinary thickening of its skull and in the 
whole texture of all the bones. 

The whole structure of the temporal region, the form of the 
squamosal, and the relations of the tabulares (postorbitals, parietals, 
and squamosals) are identical in the two types. The very curious 
auditory groove is the same in each type. The premaxille of 
Trtanosuchus have a thoroughly Tapinocephaloid appearance, and 
the position of the external nares far behind the end of the 
snout on the dorsal surface is unparalleled in Therapsids, except 
in that group. 

If Rhophalodon is indeed related to Titanosuchus, then in the 
large quadrate and the vertical area of basioccipital below the 
condyle we have very striking resemblances to the contemporary 
Tapinocephaloids. 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES, 775 


Finally, so much of the palate of Vitanosuchus as is known is 
quite unlike that of any Gorgonopsid, whilst it strikingly resembles 
in detail that of Lamiasaurus. We are, I think, therefore 
justified in regarding the two as divergent branches of the great 
order Deinocephalia. 

That the Deinocephalia are Therapsids has never been questioned 
of recent years. The whole character of the limb-bones, par- 
ticularly the humerus, is quite lke that of the corresponding 
parts of an Anomodont, and is unknown in any other group. 
The shoulder-girdle with the precoracoid excluded from the 
glenoid cavity is extremely like that of a Gorgonopsid, and, except 
for its lack of an acromion, that of Dicynodon. No similar 
arrangement is known in any other group of reptiles. In the 
more fundamental features of its skull-structure, the wide 
occipital plate with the small and greatly separated post-temporal 
fosse, the high brain-cavity, and the low position of the vestibule 
of the ear, it agrees exactly with all South African Therapsids. 
As is shown clearly by Dr. Broom’s figures of the lower jaw 
and by that of 7itanosuchus, it has the characteristic flat angular 
and notch of the Therapsids. 

The group has, however, a very special importance, because alone 
amongst the South African forms it retains a large quadrate. 
The Tapinocephaloid quadrate is relatively as large as in any 
other reptile—as large, for instance, as that of a Tortoise. The 
importance of this is that it shows that the reduction of the 
quadrate, which is so noticeable a feature of the Anomodonts 
and “‘Carnivorous” Therapsids, is not an essential feature of 
Therapsid structure, but has developed in comparatively ‘late 
times in at least two branches independently (I intend to adduce 
evidence in support of this statement in a later paper). Some 
years ago, in describing the skull of Diademodon, I pointed out 
that this reduction of the quadrate was part and parcel of a whole 
series of changes which led to the reduction of all regions of the 
skull (the basisphenoidal, basioccipital, and exoccipital regions 
in particular) which lay below the base of the brain. This 
generalisation is justified by all subsequent work on Therapsids, 
and is well illustrated by the great depth of the basicranium in 
Deinocephalia, an arrangement which may to some extent be 
paralleled in Deinosaurs. 

The exact relation of the Deinocephalia to other South African 
groups of Therapsids is not easily determined. 

The skull of Zitanosuchus bears a very considerable resem- 
blance to that of a Gorgonopsid, modified, of course, by its great 
thickness and the large bony bosses over the orbits. It is dis- 
tinctly more primitive in many features—for instance, in the less 
widely spread zygomatic arches. The skulls of the more primi- 
tive Gorgonopsids, however, show no trace of the vertical area 
of basioccipital below the condyle; and there are no features of 
the auditory region of the brain-case which in any degree suggest 
that they have been derived from a type with a Deinocephalian 


776 MR. D. M. 8. WATSON ON 


structure. It will be remembered that Rhophalodon, which is in 
many ways extremely like a Gorgonopsid, has this characteristic 
Deinocephalian structure. So far as the lower jaw goes, the 
Gorgonopsids could be derived directly from a lightly built 
Titanosuchid. The post-cranial skeleton, so far as is known, is 
also very similar, allowing for the differences due to the great 
weight of all well-known Deinocephalians or, using as a term of 
comparison, the relatively slender bones from the Ural copper- 
mines. 

In fact, it is legitimate to assume that Deinocephalia and the 
Gorgonopsids arose from a not very distant common ancestor, but 
that they subsequently pursued quite different paths. 

Perhaps the most interesting comparison is with the Anomo- 
donts. In many features (the upturned parasphenoid and the 
structure of the ethmoid, for example) there is a distinct resem- 
blance between the two groups, which also resemble one another 
to some extent in the shortness of the brain-cavity—in some types, 
at any rate. Further, many Anomodonts have a considerable 
vertically placed area of bone below the basioccipital condyle, 
which may be compared with that in Tapinocephaloids. As this 
area does not exist in Yndothiodon, whilst it is most pronounced 
in Lystrosaurus, it is probably a secondary specialisation inde- 
pendently acquired within the group. Connected with this 
feature, however, is the development of that curious process of 
the vestibule which carries the fenestra ovalis down to the lower 
border of the skull. This curious detail is found even in 
Endothiodon, a rather primitive type, and is apparently quite a 
fundamental character of the group. 

Although the cavity of the inner ear has not been cleared in 
any Deinocephalian, there can be no doubt that a similar structure 
did occur in that group—a fact which suggests a nearer relation- 
ship between the two groups than either of them hold with the 
Gorgonopsid line. 

At the same time the Deinocephalia differ from all other 
South African Therapsids in the mode of articulation of the ribs 
in the dorsal region. 

The most interesting comparison is between the Deinocephalia 
and the Pelycosauria, using that term to cover all the “Texas ” 
Therapsids. 

If we compare a Deinocephalian with the very primitive 
Varanosaurus, we find many resemblances. We have, to begin 
with, the characteristic Therapsid characters of the occiput and 
lower jaw. In addition, we find that there are striking resem- 
blances between the quadrates of the two types in their size, 
relation to the squamosal and quadratojugal, and in the power- 
ful step for the distal end of the stapes. Another resemblance is in 
the form of the squamosal, which in both types is a simple sheet 
folded round the back of the quadrate, and not produced outwards 
as in the Anomodonts and Therocephalia. The occurrence of a 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPLILES. ata 


vestigial ‘ supratemporal” in Varanosaurus is a primitive feature 
of little importance. 

Comparison of a Tapinocephaloid with Dimetrodow leads to 
some interesting results, as Broom has already pointed out. 
There is a resemblance in shape, owing to the very short teim- 
poral regions and high and compressed form of the skull in 
both groups. The basicranial region of Dimetrodon, although 
more specialised than that of Varanosaurus, shows no suggestions 
of the characteristic Deinocephalian structure, and is, in fact, 
extremely like that of the more primitive of the Gorgonopsids. 
The very peculiar parasphenoid is identical in the Deinocephalia 
and Dimetrodon, and it is probable that the ethmoids are also 
similar. The quadrate of Dimetrodon is modified from its 
primitive condition by that development backwards of the 
posterior angles of the skull which is shown by the curious 
backwardly directed processes of the outer ends of the paroccipital 
processes. Making allowance for this modification, its relations to 
the surrounding bones are essentially those held by the corre- 
sponding bone of Mormosaurus, so far, at any rate, as can be 
judged from published descriptions. In the palate also there are 
distinct resemblances in the development of the high vertical 
flanges from the pterygoids and prevomers. The two types are, 
however, specialised in directly opposite directions, one with a 
short face for a herbivorous diet, the other with the elongated 
gape which is necessary to a carnivorous animal with the charac- 
teristic reptilian habit of grasping its prey after a single snap. 

The occiput of Hdaphosaurus, as figured by Williston and Case, 
is extremely like that of Pnigalion, and, if we may judge by 
Varanosaurus, was essentially similar in structure. 

Finally, as Broom has pointed out, the face of Dimetrodon is 
structurally very similar to that of such a Deinocephalian as 
Mormosaurus—it is perhaps even more similar to that of Deutero- 
SaUrUs. 

On the whole, the Deinocephalian skull resembles that of the 
Pelycosaur more closely than it does any other South African 
Therapsid. | 

As Broom has already shown, the lower jaw of a Tapino- 
cephaloid, except for the differences due to the oppositely 
specialised dentitions, is structurally very similar to that of 
Dimetrodon. It differs, however, in the more greatly developed 
Therapsid notch. 

Broom has already shown the very striking resemblance between 
the Pelycosaur vertebrae (particularly those of Dimetrodon) and 
those of Tapinocephaloids. 

In the rest of the post-cranial skeleton, however, there is very 
much more similarity between the Tapinocephaloids and the 
other South African Therapsids than between that group and 
the earlier Pelycosaurs. 


In the cartilaginous shoulder-girdle the precoracoid is entirely 


778 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


‘excluded from the glenoid cavity, and there is no trace of the 
screw-shaped form of the articular surface which is an essential 
feature of the primitive type. The humerus also is of a more 
modernised form, its action being an up and down movement 
instead of one which is nearly parallel to the ground. ‘The 
very broad lower end of the clavicle of Titanosuchus is, however, 
a point of resemblance with the earlier forms. 

In the pelvic limb we find a somewhat similar mixture of 
characters. 

The whole pelvis, for example, is somewhat similar to that of 
Dimetrodon, particularly in the production of the outer corner of 
the front border of the pubis and its deflection, more so perhaps 
than to any South African type; but the femur is of a modernised 
type strongly resembling that of Dicynodon. 

The final result is that the presence of the Deinocephalia 
makes it impossible to exclude the American Lower Permian 
and Carboniferous Pelycosaurs from the later South African 
Therapsids. Such a division could at any time have been drawn 
only on the more primitive limbs and large quadrate of the early 
forms; the fact that in Deinocephalia we have types with a 
quadrate as large as that of the Pelycosauria combined with 
modernised limbs renders the foundation of a great group- 
division on these characters quite impossible. 

For this great stem ef the Reptilia, including all the mammal- 
like reptiles, many names are available. I am myself inclined to 
extend Broom’s Therapsida, a most appropriate name, to the 
whole of them, but I fully recognise that Cope’s earlier names of 
Theromorpha and Theromora have been used in the same sense ; 
these names were never very clearly defined by Cope, and have 
at one time or another included nearly all Permian reptiles. If 
anyone should wish to resuscitate these names in this connection, 
I would point out to them that Owen’s term Anomodontia was 
used by that author in 1860 in a wide sense to include the 
Dicynodonts and also carnivorous Therapsids from South Africa, 
and has at least as good a claim to be used as Cope’s later terms. 


Discussion of Special Features of the Skull. 


The septomaxilla of Deinocephalia is of interest on account of 
its variability. It resembles that of all other Therapsids, except 
certain Cynodonts and Anomodonts, in the fact that there is a 
foramen behind it opening from the outer surface into the nasal 
cavity. It is of interest that this foramen was first described by 
Case in Dimetrodon. It is evident in the majority of the more 
primitive South African “Carnivorous” Therapsids, and is clearly 
shown in a British Museum skull of Hndothiodon and in 
Prof. Sollas’s model of Dicynodon. Its function is unknown, the 
only suggestion I have yet found is that it may mean that the 
ductus naso-lachrymalis opened on the surface; it will be re- 
membered that in the small Temnospondylous Stegocephalian 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES. 779 


Micropholis this duct runs forwards completely in the lachrymal 
bone to the posterior end of the septomaxilla, and it appears from 
its mode of development to have been primitively a mere surface- 
groove. 

The squamosal of Deinocephalia is of some interest; in its 
relations to all other bones, particularly those of the otic capsule, 
the quadrate, tabulare, postorbital, and parietal, it agrees exactly 
with the corresponding bone of the more primitive Gorgonopsids, 
which is clearly identical with the squamosal of Diademodon, 
which is clearly homologous with the bone of the same name in 
Mammals. The squamosal of a Deinocephalian is clearly the 
same as the large temporal element in Varanosaurus, having 
similar relations to the paroccipital, postorbital and tabulare, and 
only differing in retaining its primitive connection with the 
pterygoid. As this type retains a small ‘‘supratemporal,” there 
is now no doubt that the squamosal is the outer of the three 
temporal bones in primitive Reptilia. 


The Auditory Arrangements of the Therapsids. 


Of recent years belief in the truth of Reichert’s hypothesis of 
the homologies of the mammalian ossicula auditus has been 
gradually growing, and the fine work of Gaupp has practically 
placed it beyond question. At the same time, Broom, following a 
suggestion of Seeley’s, has shown how in the gradual increase in 
size in the dentary and the decrease of the other elements of the 
jaw and the quadrate, the “carnivorous” Therapsids gradually 
approach the mammalian condition. The same author has pointed 
out that the stapes is articulated with the quadrate in Therapsids 
just as is the stapes of mammals with the incus. Finally, 
following on my own more accurate account of the Therapsid 
jaw, Mr. Palmer has shown the extraordinary similarity in detail 
between the lower jaw (including the dentary, malleus, pre- 
articular, and tympanic) of a mammary foetus of Perameles and 
that of the advanced Cynodont Diademodon. 

The homologies of the various bones being now placed beyond 
dispute by the work of these authors, it is desirable to carry the 
inquiry further and discuss the position and changes of the 
tympanic membrane and other parts of the ear. 

The stapes of Therapsids is in all cases where the condition is 
known articulated with the quadrate. In the following types, 
Cynognathus, Trirachodon, Nythosaurus, Arctognathus, Lyco- 
saurus, Dicynodon, Lystrosaurus, Dicelurodon, Kannemeyeria, 
Mormosaurus, Prigalion, Lamiasaurus, Dimetrodon, Varanosaurus, 
which cover the superorder very fairly, the stapes has actually 
been seen in place; the facet on the quadrate for its distal end is 
shown in very many more forms. 

Quite recently, when discussing the primitive Therapsid Varano- 
saurus, | pointed out that in many ways it greatly recalled the 


Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No, LILI. 53 


780 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


Cotylosaurian family of the Captorhinide, so much so that a 
blood-relationship between them seemed most probable. 

Prof. Williston had still earlier expressed a similar opinion :— 
“That we have in Labidosaurus and its allies a persistence of 
those generalized characters which gave origin to the peculiar 
specializations of the Pelycosaurs.” One of the peculiarities of 
these Captorhinids, in which they differ from all other known 
Cotylosaurs, is the fact that they have a stapes whose distal end 
is articulated with the quadrate. We have therefore some 
justification for assuming that this peculiar condition in the 
Therapsids has not arisen within that group, but has descended 
to it from its ancestors. 

I have shown that there are very strong reasons for believing 
that the reptiles have arisen from the embclomerous Stegocephalia, 
which are the only group of Tetrapods known in Lower Carboni- 
ferous rocks. In figure A, in the plate of my paper on ‘The 
larger Coal-Measure Amphibia,” Manchester Memoirs, vol. lvii. 
pt. i., there is shown a very definite depression on the upper 
surface of the quadrate and pterygoid. ‘This definite pit occurs 
in all embolomerous Stegocephalia in which I have examined 
this region, and is obviously of importance. The only explanation 
I can find for it is that it received the outer end of the stapes. 
It is important to note that in the uncrushed skull it must have 
looked towards the auditory region. There is thus a suggestion 
of evidence that the Cotylosaurs of the family which gave rise to 
the Therapsids and the Captorhinids received the condition of 
having the distal end of the stapes articulated with the quadrate 
from their amphibian ancestors, as they in turn passed it on to 
their descendauts. 

There are strong reasons for believing that the Stegocephalia 
have arisen from the Rhipidistian group of the Crossopterygian 
fishes (the Osteolepids), which were no doubt technically, though 
probably only to a slight extent, functionally hyostylic. In these 
fishes the hyomandibular, which has been seen only by Dr. Traquair 
in Rhizodopsis (an observation I have been unable to check from 
the material in the British and Manchester Museums, which 
includes at least the greater part of that which was before 
Dr. Traquair), no doubt articulated with the otic region of the 
cranium and with the quadrate, as in all fishes. There are many 
reasons for believing that the stapes of a Tetrapod is homologous 
with the hyomandibular of a fish, and it is probable that in the 
embolomerous Stegocephalia, which had just arisen from fishes, the 
primitive connection between the distal end of the hyomandibular 
or stapes and the quadrate was retained. In later Amphibia 
(Eryops, Trimerorachis, Cyclotosaurus, to mention only types in 
which it is known in place) it lost this connection, and its distal 
end is connected with a tympanic membrane stretched across the 
otic notch. 

It thus seems to be fairly probable that the connection between 
the distal end of the stapes and the incus in a mammal has been 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES, 781 


directly derived from the connection of the distal end of the 
hyomandibular and the quadrate in its far-off fish-ancestor, and 
that this connection has never been lost in the phylogeny of the 
group. 

The most primitive lower jaw known amongst Therapsids, that 
of Dimetrodon, as 1t has been described and figured by Case, 
Williston, and Broom, is differentiated from that of a member of 
any other Reptilian supererder by the characters of its posterior 
part, and particularly the angular. In Dimetrodon the angular 
is essentially a flat plate whose upper border overlaps the sur- 
angular and is itself overlapped by the dentary in the usual way, 
whilst its lower border forms the lower border of the jaw. The 
posterior end of this bone is separated from the outer side of the 
prearticular by a notch, so that the border stands out freely. 
The whole jaw is very narrow from side to side, the Meckelian 
vacuity being reduced to a very narrew slit between the pre- 
articular and the surangular. The flat plate-like angular and 
the notch in its posterior border are the characteristic features of 
this jaw, and are found in all Therapsids which are properly 
known and in no other reptiles whatsoever. 

The Deinocephalian jaw only differs from that of Dimetrodon 
in the further enlargement of the notch, which in this type 
extends forwards so as to form a deep pocket in the substance of 
the angular. In such Therocephalians as Seylacosaurus the con- 
dition of the angular is almost exactly as in Deinocephalia, there 
being a deep but very narrow pocket in the substance of the 
angular which forms a large reflected lamina outside it. The 
foramen shown in the angular in many of Broom’s figures of 
Therocephalian skulls has no existence in fact, as such, but is 
merely the anterior end of the notch. 

In the Gorgonopsids there is the usual notch and reflected 
lamina, which is, however, small, never reaching the size of that 
of Scylacosaurus. This notch in the higher Gorgonopsids, e. g. 
Arctognathus, seems to move relatively further forward. Finally, 
in the Cynognathids, which have a “‘ look” of the Gorgonopsids, 
of a character that cannot be intelligibly expressed in words but 
is very striking to anyone accustomed to handling the two types, 
and suggests that they are in all probability genetically related, 
the notch has moved still further forward, and the reilected 
lamina now stands downwards from the rest of the bone as a 
very slender process. The extraordinary resemblance of this 
bone to the tympanic of the pouch feetus of Perameles (or of 
Dasyurus) seems to me to raise a very strong case for believing 
that Cynognathus and its allies had a tympanic membrane spread 
between the divergent branches of its angular. ‘The actual shape 
of the bone makes such a, position possible, the hinder end of the 
membrane being carried by the ridge on the lower side of the 
squamosal, which lies just outside the end of the paroccipital 
process, and on the musculus depressor mandibuli, if such a 
muscle be present. A membrane in this position stands nearly 


53* 


782 ; MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


vertically in the skull, and les at the lower and inner end of the 
groove which Broom and ‘I, following the original identification 
of W. K. Gregory, regard as an external auditory meatus. If 
this position was really that held by the tympanic membrane in 
Diademodon, then in that type the tympano-tubal cavity had 
already grown up round the bones of the back of the lower jaw. 
{f this position of the membrane be correct, by tracing back 
along the series of Gorgonopsids to the Deinocephalia. we ought 
to have self-consistent results throughout, and to arrive at a 
condition in primitive forms which is not inconsistent with that 
found in known Reptilia. The series of Gorgonopsids at my 
disposal gives a sufticiently close morphological series to show 
with certainty that :—— 


lst. The noteh in the hinder border of the angular of a Deino- 
cephalian is homologous with the wide triangular notch 
in Diademodon. 

Ind. That the very small but distinct auditory groove described 
above in Deinocephalia is homologous with that of Dia- 
demodon. 

3rd. That the ridge to the outer side of the paroccipital on the 
squamosal in the two types is the same. 


These homologies lead us to expect that the tympanic membrane 
of Deinocephalia should be attached to the squamosal just outside 
the paroccipital process, to the posterior surface of the quadrate, 
and to the edge of the reflected lamina of the angular. I believe 
such an attachment to be workable inasmuch as a tympanic 
membrane attached to it might be flat. 

The groove for the external auditory meatus in Deinocephalia 
is of great interest. It is undoubtedly homologous with that of 
Diademodon, and I think almost as certainly with that of a 
mammal. It gives clear evidence that even at this time the 
tympanic membrane (whatever its precise situation and attach- 
ments) had sunk in and was no longer directly exposed on the 
outside of the head. It 1s formed by a groove between the outer 
edge of the tabulare and the squamosal; this groove terminates 
suddenly where the tabulare ends in a definite projection from 
the back of the skull which must mark the upper insertion of 
the membrane. 

It is known from the evidence of specimens which show the 
complete stapes in position—Hryops, Trimerorachis, Cyclotosaurus, 
ete.—that in Stegocephalia the tympanic membrane was stretched 
between the tabulare and the squamosal across the otic notch 
on the upper surface of the skull. By direct tracing back of 
homologous parts we have seen that in Deinocephalia the upper 
end of the membrane should be attached to the squamosal and 
the extreme distal end of the tabulare: that is, in the exact 
position we know it to have been attached in Stegocephalia 
related, although remotely, to the Deinocephalian’s amphibian 
ancestors. 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES. 783 


It will be convenient here to leave this particular line of 
argument, and starting from the normal conditions of the mem- 
brana tympani in Reptiles, try to reconstruct the arrangement in 
Dimetrodon, and so work back to the termination of our original 
argument at the Deinocephalia. 

In Lizards the insertion of the tympanic membrane is on to 
the back of the quadrate, the squamosal just outside the par- 
occipital process, and the retro-articular portion of the lower jaw. 

In Pelycosaurs and other Therapsids the retro-articular portion 
of the lower jaw is of insignificant proportions, at its largest in 
Dimetrodon. In Deinocephaha and Dicynodon it is represented 
solely by a small process from the articular directed as much down- 
wards as backwards. The definite presence of this process in these 
more primitive forms and its still further reduction in later types, 
seem to show that some Therapsid ancestor had a relatively 
large retro-articular process. As in all reptiles which have such 
a process its outer side is covered by the angular, we may assume 
that in this hypothetical ancestral Therapsid the retro-articular 
portion of the angular played some part in the support of the 
tympanic membrane. If now in such an animal we make the 
tubo-tympanal cavity grow forwards and the membrane to keep 
pace with it in such change, we must also move forward the upper 
edge of the retro-articular part of the angular to which the 
membrane is attached. As it is essential to keep the stretched 
membrane clear of other bones, and the articular and quadrate 
are by hypothesis fixed, we can only do so by separating the edge 
of the retro-articular part of the angular from other bones and 
moving it slightly outwards: this on the theory which I am at 
present expounding is the origin of the Therapsid notch, the 
upper edge of the reflected lamina being phylogenetically the 
upper border of the retro-articular portion of the angular, and 
retaining that connection with the lower edge of the membrana 
tympani which occurs in Lizards. By this method we arrive at 
a, position of the tympanic membrane in Deinocephalia identical 
with that deduced by tracing the conditions down from Cyno- 
gnathids, the arrangement in which was determined by assuming 
that the great resemblance between the angular of these types, 
with their long, slender, downwardly directed “ reflected lamina,” 
and the tympanic of a pouch-young of Perameles with its slender 
lower limb, was a real one. The fact that it is possible to trace a 
sequence of stages with only very few hypothetical intermediates 
between the actual condition of the membrana tympani in lizards 
and that in embryo mammals, and that these stages are in the 
correct time order, and are each self-consistent, seems to me to 
establish a probability that the assumption on which they depend, 
i. e. that the reflected lamina of the Therapsid angular carried the 
tympanic membrane, is a justifiable one. 

T am quite aware that the shape of the edge of this lamina in 
some types, as for example in Hndothiodon and Anomodonts 
generally, is inconsistent with the view that it carried the 


. 


784 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


membrane, but as in all these types the squamosal never shows 
any suggestion of an auditory groove or of the attachment of a 
membrane, I think it possible that they were without one, a not 
unknown condition. 

In 1910 W. K. Gregory, from the position of the anditory 
groove in Cynognathus, inferred that the tympanic cavity and 
membrane were below the reduced quadrate and articular. From 
these relations and the fact that in the ontogeny of a mammal 
the tubo-tympanal cavity grows up round the auditory ossicles 
which arise outside it, he suggested that phylogenetically this 
upgrowing of the tubo-tympanal sac around the vestigial quadrate 
and articulare may have caused them to share in its vibrations, 
and thus to take on an incipient auditory function before their 
old suspensory function had ceased. 

This is exactly the conclusion to which the above discussion, 
founded mainly on quite different evidence, has led us. 

In mammals the centre of the tympanic membrane is placed 
in connection with the chain of auditory ossicles by the handle 
of the malleus being fastened to its middle layer. In no 
Therapsid that I have yet examined is there a process of the 
articulare which could touch the membrane, so that it Is m- 
herently probable that the manubrium is a mammalian innovation. 
Tn ontogeny it arises very late, chondrifying much later than the 
incus and body of the malleus in erameles, but being apparently 
a veal part of the latter bone. 

It thus seems impossible that the membrane of Therapsids 
should be brought into connection with the fenestra ovalis in the 
ordinary mammalian way, and as the whole of the preceding 
arguments are meaningless if they have no membrane, it seems 
certain that another connection between the stapes and the 
membrane must have existed. 

In a remarkably able and suggestive paper, Dr. Gregory has 
put forward the following explanation :— 

“That in the most primitive Cynodonts, such as Bauria, there 
was an extra-columelia, resting against a tympanic membrane 
behind the squamosal, which had been differentiated out of the 
tissue lying between the endodermal epithelium of the tympanic 
eavity and the epidermis: that with the spread of the tympanic 
cavity the differentiation of the future tympanic membrane also 
spread, until it included the stretched skin on the posterior end 
of the jaw below the quadrate and articular and above the 
angular: that concomitantly with the reduction of the quadrate 
and articular and the detachment of the angular and goniale 
from the dentary, the newly differentiated portion of the tym- 
panic membrane became functionally more active than the old 
‘reptilian’ portion : that in this way the old membrane together 
with the extra-columella became vestigial, while the new membrane 
beeame altogether free from the dentary, but remained fastened 
both to the angular, which gave rise to the tympanic bone, and 
to the retro-articular process of the articular, which gave rise te 


MAMMAL-LIKE REPTILES. 785 
the manubrium of the malleus. With the reduction of the 
‘reptilian’ tympanic membrane the hyoid became separated from 
the extra-columella (as it does in many lizards) and migrated to 
a new insertion on the periotic.” 

The foregoing discussion will have shown how much of truth 
there may be in this brilliant hypothesis of Gregory’s. The 
suggestion that the stapes of Therapsids although directly arti- 
culated with the quadrate may have been connected with the 
membrane by an extra-columella, is exactly paralleled by the 
actual conditions in Mosasaurs, where the slender stapes is in- 
serted into a deep pit on the ner side of the quadrate, but is 
connected with the tympanic membrane by a process passing 
through the large special notch on the back of that bone. This 
process like the membrane is sometimes strongly calcified. The 
whole arrangement is after all only a further development of 
conditions commonly found in lizards. 

The facts as we know them in Diademodon, or rather the in- 
terpretations of those facts offered above, show that the reptilian 
portion of the tympanic membrane had actually been reduced to 
very small dimensions by a steady process connected with and 
no doubt induced by the same factor as the degeneration of the 
quadrate and the thinning of the basisphenoid and basioccipital. 

The facts also seem to show that the manubrinm mallei is 
altogether a new formation, developed whilst the articular was 
losing its suspensory function. 


If the explanation of the meaning of the observed series of 
changes in the articular region of the skull of Therapsids which 
has been presented above be true, or even if it contains but a 
small element of truth, it presents us with a good illustration of 
the fact, to my mind patent in the development of every organ 
of the body which is known, that the Therapsids from the moment 
of their initiation were committed to the final development of 
a mammalian structure. Different branches of them proceeded 
with their modifications to different degrees, and at very different 
speeds, but so far as the evidence goes, and it is no more than 
suggestive at best, their evolutionary change, in fundamental 
features, were always directed towards the final development of a 
mammalhan structure. 


I wish to acknowledge my indebtedness to the Percy Sladen 
Trustees, who assisted me in visiting the South African Museums. 
To Dr. Smith Woodward IL owe the opportunity of describing the 
material in the British Museum (Natural History), which is the 
basis of this paper, and I also owe to him and to Dr. C. W. 
Andrews thanks for their many kindnesses during my work at 
the Museum. Finally, I have to thank Mr. R. Hall, chief 
‘“mason” at the Museum, who developed the skulls described in 
this paper from a matrix which in many places is as hard as 
flint. 


l on Pet a { ae y 
es) me ‘i ae epee ee ey 
$BGx i a ene KE REPTILES. ee 
. } : \ : fo) ~1 : i; 
| a eS 
EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. = 2 | | 
Prats IV. wae 3 ee 


Fig.1. Skull of Mormosaurus seeleyi, gen. et sp. un. Type specimen (R. 3594). 
From side. About + nat. size. We 

Fig. 2, Skull of Mormosaurus seeleyi, gen. et sp. n. Type specimen (R. 3594). — 
Obliquely from front. About } nat. size. at 


Puate V. 


- Skull of Titanosuchus feror Owen. (R.3595,) From above. 
About 3 nat. size. 


PZ.S.1914.PRESTON.PLI. 
2x. 


eed a, 


eC GC oxPe. a3xea. 


SEALE 


G.MWoodward del.et lith. Huthimp. 
NEW ZONITIDA FROM EQUATORIAL AFRICA. 


PAS. Lo] PAE See 


LO xl. 


es 


Bey ale, 


G.M.Woodward del.et lth. Huth imp. 


NEW ZONITIDA FROM EQUATORIAL AFRICA. 


P2Z.5.1914 PRES YON. Pian 
ISeae 


G.M.Woodward del.et lith, Huth imp. 


NEW ZONITIDA FROM EQUATORIAL AFRICA, 


ON NEW GENERA AND SPECIES OF ZONIVIDA FROM AFRICA. 787 
43. Diagnoses of new Genera and Species of Zonitidee from 
Equatorial Africa. By H. B. Preston, F.Z.8. 
[Received April 3, 1914: Read May 5, 1914. ] 


(Plates I-III.*) 


INDEX. Page 

Geoomap incall apeeses ithe penetra cone oa eictade cota ON 
Systematic : 

IOV GO DANG D1 il Scqubdodsoce dco teen sas ebIaagEae Om a) 

IE aPURT AMG FOE NG goo bscee dsocns ecocaacen or crgeee, UL 

TIGRE ANG, (RDBlo We do 30 dclachashonwedbeone can ehearen WEL) 

J GERDA Gi, (RDN Whe, csp baboceacesabaanaqaucoceepecesecen | tll) 

INCU T RA iy ERO Wo shnecsecacnsecannboeeseeeoneenss  telUY4 

DGIRETC AH Kei E295 We esnos nbudeoedaHeascodespaaace sencdd mae. 

WRGLERSANG, BOUS Silo enacbsaqnon copaosossoncensancee | AUB) 

IRON AL NING sodees beg seasacmes ooo cd=soc dapeepere yO 

Faltloonella, gen. MN. ....-..-.. eee eceeeeces. 1009, 


And 74sp.n., 1 sub-sp. n., and 2 var. n. 


In working at the present family the author has found it 
necessary to refer a number of the species to new genera, having 
found that the Zonitide of the Central African region have been, 
hitherto, in common with those of many other geographical areas, 
massed together in a few genera, so that these now contain many 
widely divergent forms; in very few instances has he found, as 
might have been reasonably expected, that the South African 
generic and subgeneric terms are applicable to the Central African 
types, hence the nine new genera described in the present paper. 

Generally speaking, the family, as represented in Central 
Africa, has not, so far, shown in any marked degree, the peculiar 
local phases common to both genera and species such as the 
author found when dealing with the agnathous forms from the 
same localities, and which were described last year in these 
‘ Proceedings.’ 


AFRICARION CONCAVOSPIRA, sp. n. (Pl. IL. fig. 20.) 


Shell subovate, very thin, almost membranaceous, transparent, 
polished, straw-colour; whorls 3, the first two small, sunken, 
sculptured with punctate spiral striz, the last whorl large, raised 
above the first two, dilated in front, marked only with transverse 
growth-plications ; suture deeply impressed, bordered below by an 
ill-defined granular zone; columella margin descending in a 
younded curve; labrum simple, projecting in front, receding 
above and below ; aperture broadly dilated. 

Alt. 7:25, diam. maj. 12, diam. min. 8°5 mm. 

Aperture : alt. 7°25, diam. 7°5 mm. 

Hab. Kiduha, Lake Mutanda, S.W. Uganda. (Robin Kemp.) 


* For explanation of the Plates see p. 810, 


788 MR. H. B. PRESTON ON NEW GENERA AND 


AFRICARION CoPIosA, sp.n. (PI. II. fig. 13.) 

Shell subelliptical, solidly corneous, brownish olive; whorls 3, 
rapidly increasing, the Jast very large, marked with transverse, 
radiate growth-plice and irregular, distant, scvatch-like, spiral 
sulcations; suture impressed ; base of shell moderately convex ; 
columella margin arched above, angled and obliquely descending 
below; labrum simple, considerably projecting in front, receding 
above and below ; aperture ovate. 

Alt. 9°75, diam. maj. 17, diam. min. 12°5 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 9, diam. 10°5 mm. 

Hab. Burunga, Mount Mikeno, Belgian Congo, at an altitude 


of 6000 feet. (Robin Kemp.) 


AFRICARION KIDUHAENSIS, sp. n. (PI. II, fig. 16.) 


Shell differing from 4. copiosa Preston in its more globular 
form, membranaceous texture, slightly paler colour, more obliquely 
descending columella margin and more circular aperture. 

Alt. 9, diam. maj. 14°75, diam. min. 11 mm, 

Aperture: alt. 8°25, diam. 9 mm. 

Hab. Kiduha, Lake Mutanda, 8.W. Uganda. (Robin Kemp.) 


AFRICARION MARSABITENSIS, sp. n. (PI. II. fig. 14.) 


Shell ovate, much inflated, thin, pale reddish brown ; whorls 3, 
the last two rapidly increasing, the earlier whorls marked with 
punctate spiral striz, the last with arcuate transverse growth- 
lines only; suture very lightly impressed, narrowly margined 
below; base of shell inflated; columella margin obliquely 
descending, broadly curving below; labrum simple, acute ; 
aperture roundly ovate. 

Alt. 12°75, diam. maj. 15°75, diam. min. 12 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 10°75, diam. 9°5 mm. 

Hab. Northern slopes of Mount Marsabit, British East Africa, 
at an altitude of 4600 feet. (A. Blayney Percival.) 


AFRICARION ORESTIAS, sp. n. (Pl. II. fig. 15.) 


Shell rather small, ovate, very thin, almost membranaceous, 
pale yellowish brown, polished, shining; whorls 3, rapidly 
increasing, the last very large, moderately convex, projecting in 
front; suture almost linear, narrowly margined below; columella 
margin descending in a rounded curve; aperture wide, very 
large, dilated, roundly ovate; labrum membranaceous, receding 
above and below. 

Alt. 6, diam. maj. 9°5, diam. min. 7:25 (nearly) mm. 

Aperture: alt. 5°5, diam. 5°75 mm. 

Hab. Slopes of Mount Kenia, British East Africa. (Robin 
Kemp.) 


AFRICARION OSCITANS, sp.n. (PI. II. fig. 4.) 


Shell thin, pale amber-colour, semiovate, depressed, the spire 
very slightly exserted ; whorls 3, rapidly increasing, the first two 


SPECIES OF ZONITIDH FROM EQUATORIAL AFRICA, 789 


sculptured with spiral punctate lines, the last obsoletely, obliquely, 
arcuately, transversely plicate; suture impressed, margined above, 
the margin being of a pinkish colour; columella margin almost 
vertically descending above, gently curved below ; labrum simple, 
projecting in front, receding considerably below and a. little 
above ; aperture large, wide, subovate. 

Alt. 9°5, diam. maj. 13°5, diam. min. 9°75 mm, 

Aperture: alt. 7, diam. 8 mm. 

Hab. Lake Mutanda, 8.W. Uganda. (Robin Kemp.) 


AFRICARION SPATIOSA, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 17.) 


Shell oblong, depressed, thin, nearly membranaceous, straw- 
colour, polished, shining; whorls 3, the first two very small and 
sculptured with somewhat distant, punctate, spiral strie, the last 
very large,and marked only with radiate, wrinkle-like plications ; 
suture lightly impressed, callously margined below ; base of shell 
inflated ; columella excavated ; aperture ovate, very wide, and 
broad. 

Alt. 7°5, diam. maj. 11°75, diam. min. 8 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 7°25, diam. 9°25 mm. 

Hab. Burunga, Mount Mikeno, Belgian Congo, at an altitude 
of 6000 feet. (Robin Kemp.) 


AFRICARION KAGAMBAHENSTS, sp. n. (PI. IT. fig. 18.) 


Shell differing from 4. spatiosa Preston in its more ovate form, 
in the greater elevation of the spire, in its broader and much 
more convex base, and in the shape of the aperture, which is much 
narrower and higher in proportion to its breadth; moreover, the 
punctate spirals on the earlier whorls are much finer and more 
closely set than is the case with A. spatiosa. 

Alt. 8 (nearly), diam. maj. 11, diam. min. 8 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 7°75, diam. 8°25 mm. 

Hab. Kagambah, 8.W. Uganda. (Robin Kemp.) 


AFRICARION TENEPROSA, sp.n. (PI. II. fig. 19.) 


Shell subelliptical, thin, almost membranaceous, dark reddish 
brown, polished, shining; whorls 3, rapidly increasing, the last 
large, sculptured with transverse growth-lines ; suture impressed, 
margined below, the margin being of a darker colour than the 
remainder of the shell ; columella margin descending obliquely, 
obtusely angled and excavated below ; Tabr um simple, projecting 
in front, receding above and below; aperture ovate. 

Alt. 7, diam. maj. 10°25, diam. min. 9°5 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 6, diam. 8 mm. 

Hab. Burunga, Mount Mikeno, Belgian Congo, at an altitude 
of 6000 feet. (Robin Kemp.) 


GUDEELLA ARANEA, Ssp.n. (PI. IIT. fig. 20.) 


Shell somewhat depressedly turbinate, yellowish brown ; 
whorls 5, regularly increasing, the last subangular just above the 


790 MR. H. B. PRESTON ON NEW GENERA AND 


periphery; sculptured with extremely fine, closely-set, wavy, 
microscopic, spiral strie, which appear to be rather coarser in the 
subsutural region ; suture impressed, narrowly margined below ; 
perforation narrow, internally slightly angled and sculptured with 
somewhat distant and coarse, spiral lire crossed by radiate growth- 
puckerings ; columella descending in a curve, very slightly out- 
wardly retlexed above; labrum simple; aperture obliquely and 
compressedly sublunate. 

Alt. 3°25, diam. maj. 6, diam. min. 5:25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 2, diam. 2-5 mm. 

Hab. Between Entebbe and Masaka, 8.W. Uganda. (Robin 
Kemp.) 

The internal sculpture of the umbilicus somewhat resembles 
the pattern of a spider’s web, hence the trivial name. 


GUDEELLA BARTAENSIS, sp.n. (PI. IIL. fig. 6.) 

Shell very depressedly turbinate, pale brownish yellow ; 
whorls 43, regularly increasing, sculptured throughout with very 
fine, closely-set, wavy, spiral striz ; suture impressed, very nar- 
rowly margined ; umbilicus narrow, deep; columella outwardly 
veflexed above, very slightiy obliquely descending; labrum 
simple; aperture sublunate. 

Alt. 3°5 (nearly), diam. maj. 6°25, diam. min. 5:25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 3, diam. 2:75 mm. 

Hab. Barta Steppes, British East Africa, (A, Blayney 
Percival.) 


GUDEELLA KAMPALAENSIS, sp. n. (PI. IIL. fig. 10.) 

Shell differing from G. bartaénsis Preston in its smaller size, 
much more narrowly margined suture, and in being microscopically 
spirally striate throughout; the aperture is also more obliquely 
and compressedly sublunate. 

Alt. 3, diam, maj. 5°25, diam. min. 5 (nearly) mm. 

Aperture: alt. 2°25, diam. 2°25 mm. 

Hab. Kampala on Lake Victoria Nyanza, 8.W. Uganda; also 
found at Entebbe and Jinga in the same district. (Robin Kemp.) 


GUDEELLA URGUESSENSIS, sp. n. (PI. ITI. fig. 17.) 


Shell closely allied to G. bartuénsis Preston, but rather broader, 
with wider umbilicus and much more oblique columella; the 
aperture is considerably broader, though no higher, and the 
microscopic spiral sculpture is much finer than is the case in that 
species. 

Alt. 3°75, diam. maj. 6°75, diam. min. 6 mm. 

Aperture : alt. 2°25, diam. 2:75 mm. 

Hab. Urguess, British East Africa, (A. Blayney Percival.) 


GUDEELLA CONSUETA, sp. n. (Pl. III. fig. 18.) 


Shell thin, depressedly turbinate, polished, shining, pale reddish 
brown ; whorls 44, regularly increasing, the last subangulate at 


SPECIES OF ZONITIDE FROM EQUATORIAL AFRICA. 791 


the periphery, sculptured throughout with very fine, wavy, spiral 
strie ; suture impressed, margined below; umbilicus narrow, 
deep; columella margin obliquely descending, extending above 
into a thin, parietal callus; labrum acute; aperture rather 
obliquely sublunate. 

Alt. 3, diam. maj. 6, diam. min. 5°25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 2°5, diam. 2°5 mm. 

Hab. Between Mbarara and Masaka, S.W. Uganda. (Robin 
Kemp.) 

GUDEBLLA usITATA, sp.n. (PI. III. fig. 2.) 


Shell differing from G. consweta Preston in its smaller size and 
comparatively rather more elevated spire, in having half a whorl 
less, and in its more vertical columella and proportionately broader 
aperture; the spiral sculpture is also much finer on the whorls 
than on the base of the shell, while in G. consweta it is regular 
throughout. 

Alt. 2°75, diam. maj. 4°5, diam. min. 4 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 2, diam. 2°5 mm. 

Hab. Between Masaka and Entebbe, 8.W. Uganda. (Robin 
Kemp.) 


GUDEELLA DENSESCULPTA, sp. n. (PI. III. fig. 14.) 


Shell very depressedly turbinate, thin, subhyaline, pale greyish 
straw-colour; whorls 5, regularly increasing, very closely, micro- 
scopically, spirally striate ; suture impressed, callously margined 
below, the marginal callus being rather more coarsely and dis- 
tantly, spirally striate than the remainder of the shell; umbilicus 
narrow; columella descending in a very oblique curve ; labruin 
simple; aperture rather obliquely sublunate. 

Alt. 3°5, diam. maj. 7, diam. min. 6 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 3, diam. 2°75 mm. 

Hab. Kagambah, 8.W. Uganda. (Robin Kemp.) 


GuDEELLA MIME, sp. n. (PI. IIT. fig. 23.) 


Shell differing from G. densesculpta Preston in its much 
smaller size, in having one whorl less, and in its darker colour, 
which is of an amber hue; the last whorl is subangulate above, 
the columella margin descends vertically and the aperture, though 
sublunate, is less oblique. 

Alt. 2. diam. maj. 3°75, diam. min. 3°25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 1°75, diam. 1°75 mm. 

Hab. Kagambah, 8.W. Uganda. (Robin Kemp.) 


GUDEBLLA ELGONENSIS, sp.n. (PI. III. fig. 19.) 


Shell turbinate, not very depressed, polished, shining, pale 
brownish horn-colour; whorls 5, regularly increasing, the last 
rounded, the remainder flattish, sculptured with very fine and 
closely-set, microscopic, wavy, spiral stria, the same sculpture 
also occurring on the hase of the shell; suture impressed, very 


792 MR. H. B. PRESTON ON NEW GENERA AND 


narrowly margined below ; umbilicus narrow, partly overhung by 
the outward expansion of the upper portion of the columella ; 
columella margin outwardly expanded and slightly curved above, 
not outwardly expanded and very obliquely descending below ; 
labrum simple; aperture broadly, obliquely sublunate. 

Alt. 3°75, diam. maj. 6°5, diam. min. 6 mm. 

Aperture: alt, 2°75, diam. 3 (nearly) mm. 

Hab. Mount Elgon, Uganda. (C. W. Woodhouse.) 


GUDELLA GERSTENBRANDTI, sp. n. (PI. ITI. fig. 7.) 


Shell differing from G. elgonensis Preston in its smaller size 
and more compressed last whorl, darker colour, and more curved 
columella ; the aperture also is proportionately not so broad and 
is less oblique. 

Alt. 3°5 (nearly), diam. maj. 5°75, diam. min. 5 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 2°5, diam. 2°5 mm. 

Hab. Mount Elgon, Uganda. (C. W. Woodhouse.) 


GUDEELLA WooDHouSsEI, sp. n. (PI. III. fig. 13.) 


Shell allied to G. elgonensis Preston, but larger, with more 
obtuse apex and more convex whorls, the columella is much more 
vertically descending and the aperture is proportionately higher 
than in that species. 

Alf. 5, diam. maj. 7°25, diam. min, 6°5 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 3, diam. 3 mm. 

Hab. Mount Elgon, Uganda. (C. W. Woodhouse.) 


GUDEHLLA INCLINANS, sp. n. (PI. III. figs. 1 & 8.) 


Shell depressed with sloping sides, thin, reddish brown becoming 
paler on the base towards the umbilical area; whorls 4, rather 
rapidly increasing, having a somewhat drooping appearance, the 
last very slightly descending i in front, marked with radiate growth- 
plicee which are more noticeable in the subsutural region and 
sculptured throughout with fine, wavy, spiral strie ; suture im- 
pressed, margined below ; umbilicus narrow, partly concealed by 
the outward expansion of the columella; columella margin out- 
wardly expanded and descending in a gentle curve above, oblique 
below ; labrum simple, acute, projecting in front, slightly receding 
above, greatly receding below; aperture broadly and somewhat 
obliquely sublunate. 

Alt. 3°75 (nearly), diam. maj. 7, diam. min. 6 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 3°25, diam. 3 mm. 

Hab. Burunga, Mount Mikeno, Belgian Congo, at an altitude 
of 6000 feet. (Robin Kemp.) 


GUDEELLA INFLATA, sp. n. (PI. IIT. fig. 21.) 


Shell differing from G. inclinans Preston in its larger size, 
much more inflated form, and darker colour which is uniform 
throughout, much finer spiral sculpture and more narrow um- 
bilicus, more vertically descending columella and ovate aperture, 


SPECIES OF ZONITIDE FROM EQUATORIAL AFRICA, 793 


Alt. 5°25, diam. maj. 7°75, diam. min. 6°5 mm. 
Aperture: alt. 4:25, diam. 3°75 mm. 
Hab. Barunga, Mount Mikeno, Belgian Congo, at an altitude 


of 6000 feet. (Robin Kemp.) 


GUDEHLLA IRIDESCENS, sp. n. (PI. III. fig. 15.) 


Shell allied to @. inclinans Preston, but rather larger, though 
having the same number of whorls and with coarser spiral 
Sculpture, the sutural margin is broader and the columella 
descends vertically above, and is then angled and very oblique 
below, the aperture consequently being broader than in G. in- 
clinans; when placed under the microscope the surface of the 
shell appears to be highly iridescent. 

Alt. 4:25, diam. maj. 7°75, diam. min. 6°20 mm, 

Aperture: alt. 3°25, diam. 3°5 mm. 

Hab. Mount Mikeno, Belgian Congo. (Robin Kemp.) 


GUDEELLA MARSABITENSIS, sp. n. (PI. III. fig. 22.) 


Shell somewhat depressedly orbicular, thin, semi-transparent, 
pale reddish brown ; whorls 5, regularly increasing, the last sub- 
angulate above, sculptured with very fine, wavy, closely-set, spiral 
striz ; suture impressed, margined below, the margin rather more 
coarsely spirally striate than the remainder of the surface and 
having the spiral striz crossed by very oblique, scratch-like lines ; 
base of shell moderately convex, sculptured with exceedingly fine, 
microscopic, wavy, spiral stri# and coarser, somewhat distant, 
revolving lines; umbilicus rather wide, deep; columella margin 
outwardly expanded above, curved, obliquely descending below ; 
labrum simple ; aperture obliquely sublunate. 

Alt. 3°5, diam. maj. 6°75, diam. min. 6 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 2°75, diam. 3 mm. 

Hab. Northern slopes of Mount Marsabit, British East Africa, 
at an altitude of 4600 feet. (A. Blayney Percival.) 


GUDEELLA MASAKAENSIS, sp.n. (Pl. III. fig. 16.) 


Shell very depressedly turbinate, olivaceous brown, polished, 
shining; whorls 4, regularly increasing, sculptured with very 
fine, wavy, closely-set, microscopic, spiral striz ; suture impressed, 
margined below, the sculpture on the margins, as also on the base 
of the shell, being slightly coarser than on the remainder of the 
upper surface; umbilicus narrow, not deep; columella margin 
outwardly reflexed above, descending in a very oblique curve, 
extending into a very thin, but well-defined, parietal callus which 
enters the mouth of the shell just behind the upper margin of 
the labrum ; labrum simple, receding below ; aperture obliquely, 
broadly, and rather compressedly sublunate. 

Alt, 2°5, diam. maj. 5, diam. min. 4°25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 1:75, diam. 2 mm. 

Hab. Between Entebbe and Masaka, S.W. Uganda. (Robin 
Kemp.) 


794 MR. H. B. PRESTON ON NEW GENERA AND 


GUDEBLLA MULTISTRIATA, sp. n. (Pl. III. fig. 3.) 


Shell small, thin, depressed, suborbicular, pale yellowish horn- 
colour; whorls 4, sculptured throughout with fine, very closely- 
set, spiral striae, the last large ; suture lightly impressed, margined 
below ; perforation nearly concealed by the rather broad outward 
expansion of the columella margin; columella margin obliquely 
descending; labrum simple, acute; aperture broadly obliquely 
sublunate. 

Alt. 2°75, diam. maj. 5°75, diam. min. 5 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 2°5, diam. 2°75 mm. 

Hab. Buhamba, near Lake Kivu, Belgian Congo, (Robin 
Kemp.) 

Allied to Thapsia insimulans Smith * from the Nyika Plateau, 
British Central Africa, but larger, with broader whorls and 
coarser spiral sculpture. 


JUDEELLA MUKANDANSIS, sp. n. (PI. ITI. fig. 11.) 

Shell differing from G. kigeziensis Preston T in its larger size, 
much paler colour, more exserted spire, narrower umbilicus, more 
oblique aperture, and in being microscopically spirally sculptured 
above, which is not the case with G. kigeziensis. 

Alt. 4:5, diam. maj. 9°25, diam. min. 8 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 4, diam. 3°75 mm. 

Hab. Mukanda, near Lake Kivu. (Robin Kemp.) 


GUDEELLA MUKANDAENSIS, Var. MUTANDANA, var.n. (PI. IIL. 
fig. 12.) 

Shell differing from the typical form in being rather more 
widely perforate, darker in colour, with oblique columella margin 
and more rounded aperture. 

Alt. 4°75, diam. maj. 9°5 (nearly), diam. min. 7:75 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 4:25, diam. 4°25 mm. 

Hab. Lake Mutanda, 8.W. Uganda. (Robin Kemp.) 


GUDEELLA CONSOBRINA, sp. n. (PI. ITT. fig. 9.) 


Shell differmg from G. mukandaénsis Preston in its colour, 
which is of a creamy hue, much more inflated form, more verti- 
cally descending columella margin, less oblique, wider, and more 
compressed aperture, and in the total absence of spiral sculpture. 

Alt. 5, diam. maj. 9°25, diam. min. 8 (nearly) mm, 

Aperture: alt. 4°25, diam. 4:25 mm. 

Hab. Mukanda, near Lake Kivu. (Robin Kemp.) 


GUDEELLA NEMORUM, sp. n. (PI. IIT. fig. 24.) 


Shell perforate, depressedly turbinate, thin, somewhat polished, 
very light reddish brown; whorls 5, regularly increasing, not 
convex, the last slightly shouldered above, sculptured with very 


Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1899, p. 583, pl. xxxiii. figs. 16, 17, 18. 
Proc. Malac. Soc. London, x. p. 285, 1913. 


SPECIES OF ZONITIDE FROM EQUATORIAL AFRICA, 795 


fine, closely-set, wavy, spiral strive ; suture impressed, margined 
below ; base of shell sculptured as above ; umbilicus rather wide, 
deep ; columella margin outwardly expanded, descending in a 
very oblique curve, diffused above into a thin, well-defined, out- 
wardly projecting, parietal callus which reaches the upper margin 
of the labrum; labrum acute, slightly sinuous, projecting in 
front, receding below and slightly above ; aperture rather broadly 
obliquely sublunate. 

Alt. 3°75, diam. maj. 7, diam, min. 6 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 3, diam. 3°25 mm. 

Hab. Forests to the north of Mount Kenia, British East 
Africa, (A. Blayney Percival.) 


GUDEELLA PALLIDIOR, sp.n. (Pl. III. fig. 5.) 


Shell depressedly orbicular, greyish yellow, polished, shining ; 
whorls 4, regularly increasing, sculptured with microscopic, 
closely-set, spiral striz ; base of shell sculptured with fine, slightly 
distant and wavy, revolving, scratch-like striz; suture impressed, 
margined below; umbilicus narrow, very slightly overhung by 
the outward expansion of the columella; columella margin 
descending in an oblique curve; labrum simple, whitish at the 
extreme edge; aperture rather broadly, obliquely, and compressedly 
sublunate. 

Alt. 3, diam. maj. 5°75, diam. min. 5 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 2°5, diam. 2°75 (nearly) mm. 

Hab. Urguess, British East Africa, (A. Blayney Percival.) 


GUDEELLA TRIBULATIONIS, sp. n. (Pl. IIT. fig. 4.) 


Shell depressedly turbinate, shining, pale reddish brown; 
whorls 4, sculptured throughout with fine, closely-set, wavy, 
spiral striz ; base of shell pale yellowish grey ; suture impressed, 
narrowly margined below, the margin being of a whitish colour; 
umbilicus deep, but very narrow ; columella vertically descending 
above, slightly oblique, and curved below; labrum simple; 
aperture compressedly sublunate. — . 

Alt. 3°5, diam. maj. 5°75, diam. min. 5 mm. 

Aperture: alts 2°5, diam. 2°75 (nearly) mm. 

Hab. Mount Elgon, 8.W. Uganda. (C. W. Woodhouse.) 


ELGONELLA, gen. nov. 


Shell rather small, corneous, perforate, turbinate or depressedly 
so, marked only with transverse plications or growth-strie, and 
having the labrum slightly reflexed. 

Genotype: LZ. euloteformis Preston. 


The genus should also inelude :— 
g 


Zingis gaziensis Preston, from Gazi, British East Africa, Ann. 
Mag. Nat. Hist. London, ser. 8, vol. vii. 1911, p. 467, pl. xi. fig. 10. 
Froc. Zoou, Soc.—1914, No. LIV. 54 


796 MR. H. B. PRESTON ON NEW GENERA AND 


Zingis consanguinea Preston, from the Mount Kenia Region, 
Ua omteses We 

Zingis kempi Preston, from 8.W. Uganda, Proc. Zool. Soc. 
London, 1912, p. 185, pl. xxxii. fig. 14. 


ELGONELLA EULOTEFORMIS, sp.n. (Pl. II. figs. 9a, 9b, 9.) 


Shell perforate, moderately solid, turbinate, pale yellowish, 
slightly polished ; whorls 5, regularly increasing, sculptured with 
very oblique, transverse growth plications and strie#; suture 
impressed ; umbilicus somewhat wide, deep ; columella outwardly 
reflexed above, descending in a rather oblique curve; labrum 
acute, narrowly reflexed; aperture compressedly and very 
broadly sublunate. 

Alt. 5°5, diam. maj. 7°25, diam. min. 6°5 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 4°25, diam. 3°25 mm. 


Hab. Kagambah, 8.W. Uganda. (Robin Kemp.) 


ELGONELLA BRUNNEA, sp. n. (PI. II. figs. 11a, 11 6.) 


Shell perforate, turbinate, dark grey, covered with a thin, dark 
brown periostracum; whorls 5, the last somewhat convex, 
marked with oblique, rather coarse growth-ridges; suture im- 
pressed, erenellated by the terminations of the transverse erowth- 
ridges; umbilicus rather wide, deep; columella descending 
obliquely, curved above and slightly outwardly expanded ; labrum 
simple ; aperture broadly sublunate. 

Alt. 4:75 (nearly), diam, maj. 7 (nearly), diam. min. 6 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 3, diam. 2°5 (nearly) mm. 

Hab. Rumruti, British East Africa. (Robin Kemp.) 


ELGONELLA DISCOLORATA, sp.n. (PI. II. figs. 7a, 7 6.) 


Shell depressedly turbinate, greyish, mottled, clouded and 
closely spirally striated or banded with cream-colour; whorls 5, 
regularly increasing, smooth but for growth-markings ; suture 
impressed ; umbilicus moderately wide, deep ; columella vertically 
descending above, curved below, slightly reflexed; labrum 
simple ; aperture somewhat oblique, ovate. 

Alt. 4:5, diam. maj. 8, diam. min. 7 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 3°25, diam. 3 mm. 

Hab. Larogi Hills, British East Africa. (A. Blayney Percival.) 

The cream -coloured markings seem to be caused by local 
opaqueness in the texture of the shell. 


ELGONELLA FLAVIDULA, sp. n. (PI. II. figs. 5a, 5 6.) 


Sheli perforate, depressedly turbinate, rather thin, pale yel- 
lowish ; whorls 5, marked only with irregular, oblique, arcuate 
growth-lines ; suture impressed ; umbilicus rather broad, open 
deep; columella margin outwardly expanded above, descending 
in a curve; labrum simple; aperture compressedly ovate. 

Alt. 5, diam. maj. 8°25, diam. min. 7:25 mm. 

Aperture ; alt. 3°25, diam. 2°75 mm. 

Hab. Mount Elgon, Uganda. (C. W. Woodhouse.) 


SPECIES OF ZONITIDE FROM EQUATORIAL AFRICA, 797 


ELGONELLA ANGUSTIOR, sp. n. (PI. IT. figs. 6a, 66.) 


Shell allied to H. favidula Preston, but of a pale brown colour 
and more narrowly turbinate, with subangulate last whorl; the 
umbilicus is narrower, the aperture is higher and narrower, and 
the margins of the labrum are convergent. 

Alt, 4°5, diam. maj. 7°25, diam. min. 7 mm, 

Aperture: alt, 3, diam. 3 mm, 

Hab. Mount Elgon, 8.W. Uganda. (C. W. Woodhouse.) 


ELGONELLA onIBATES, sp. n. (PI. II. figs 8a, 8b.) 


Shell small, turbinate, light reddish brown, smooth, slightly 
polished ; whorls 43, regularly increasing, marked with oblique 
growth-lines; suture impressed; umbilicus very narrow, deep; 
columella rather broadly outwardly expanded, descending in a 
rather gentle curve ; labrum simple; aperture roundly ovate. 

Alt. 4°25, diam. maj. 5:75, diam. min. 5 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 3, diam. 3 mm. 

Hab. Mount Elgon, Uganda. (C. W. Woodhouse.) 


ELGONELLA ROBINI, sp.n. (Pl. I. figs. 10a, 10 6.) 


Shell perforate, turbinate, light brown, smooth, but for oblique 
growth-ridges ; whorls 43, regularly increasing, the last subangu- 
Jate at the periphery; suture impressed; umbilicus moderately 
narrow, deep; columella slightly excavated above, somewhat 
vertically descending below; labrum simple; aperture very 
compressedly, broadly sublunate. 

Alt. 4, diam. maj. 6°25, diam. min. 5°75 mm. 

Aperture ; alt. 2°75, diam. 2°5 mm. 

Hab. Rumruti, British East Africa. (Robin Kemp.) 


ELGONELLA SOBRINA, Sp.n. (PI. IT. figs. 12a, 126.) 

Shell differing from #. robini Preston in its smaller and pro- 
portionately much more depressed form and in its rounded last 
whorl; it has half a whorl less and the growth-ridges are much 
more marked and the umbilicus is narrower; the columella and 
the aperture are somewhat more oblique and the latter is pro- 
portionately broader. 

Alt. 3°5, diam. maj. 5°75, diam. min. 5 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 2°25, diam. 2°5 mm. 

Hab. Rumruti, British Kast Africa. (Robin Kemp.) 


BURUNGAELLA, gen. nov. 


Shell thin, corneous, whorls rather tightly coiled, the last 
proportionately large, more or less obsoletely, transversely plicate ; 
aperture somewhat large. 

Genotype: &. oscitans Preston. 


BURUNGAELLA OSCITANS, sp. n. (PI. I. figs. 17a, 176, 17.) 


Shell perforate, very thin, almost membranaceous, very de- 
pressedly turbinate above, convex below, pale brownish straw- 


798 MR. H. B. PRESTON ON NEW GENERA AND 


colour; whorls 5, regularly increasing, the last large, marked 
with obsolete, oblique, transverse, crease-like plications which are 
more developed in the subsutural region ; suture impressed ; base 
of shell somewhat inflated; umbilicus rather narrow, deep, 
partly overhung by the outward expansion of the columella; 
columella very slightly curved, scarcely oblique; labrum simple, 
membranaceous, projecting a little in front ; aperture ovate. 

Alt. 7:5, diam. maj. 10°75, diam. min. 8°25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 6°25, diam. 4°5 mm. 

Hab. Burunga, Mount Mikeno, Belgian Congo, at an altitude 
of 6000 feet. (Robin Kemp.) 


BuRUNGAELLA BUHAMBAENSIS, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 16.) 


Shell perforate, thin, corneous, turbinate, pale yellowish brown; 
whorls 5, the first small, the second somewhat large in proportion, 
the remainder regularly increasing, slightly convex, irregularly 
and obsoletely plicate and sculptured with wavy, transverse strie, 
the last whorl angled at the periphery; suture impressed, very 
narrowly margined below ; umbilicus very narrow, deep, almost 
covered by the upper, broad, outward expansion of the columella 
margin; columella margin membranaceous, broadly, triangularly, 
outwardly expanded and nearly vertically descending above, 
then angled and very obliquely descending below; aperture 
broadly and rather compressedly obliquely subcrescentie. 

Alt. 5°5, diam. maj. 7, diam. min. 6 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 4, diam. 3 mm. 

Hab. Buhamba, near Lake Kivu, Belgian Congo. (Robin 
Kemp.) 


BURUNGAELLA IMPERFORATA, Sp. n. (PI. I. fig..15.) 


Shell imperforate, turbinate, very thin, yellowish brown; whorls 
5, regularly increasing, the last somewhat inflated, the last two 
microscopically spirally striate and marked with oblique, trans- 
verse, crease-like plicee ; suture impressed ; base of shell inflated ; 
columella obliquely descending, outwardly, callously expanded 
above; aperture depressedly and very broadly sublunate. 

Alt. 6°25, diam. maj. 9°25, diam. min. 7°75 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 4°75, diam. 4°25 mm. 

Hab. Burunga, Mount Mikeno, Belgian Congo, at an altitude 
of 6000 feet. (Robin Kemp.) 


BURUNGAELLA MUTANDANA, sp.n. (PI. I. fig. 14.) 


Shell rather depressedly turbinate, thin, pale yellowish brown; 
whorls 43, regularly increasing, the last subangulate at the 
periphery, marked with oblique transverse riblets or creases, which 
become obsolete on the base; suture impressed, crenellated by 
the terminations of the transverse riblets; umbilicus moderately 
narrow, deep; columella rather broadly outwardly expanded 


SPECIES OF ZONITIDA FROM: EQUATORIAL AFRICA, 799 


above, descending in a somewhat cblique curve; labrum thin, 
almost membranaceous, very slightly reflexed; aperture ovate. 
Alt. 5, diam. maj. 8°75, diam. min. 7°25 mm, 
Aperture; alt. 4, diam. 4°25 (nearly) mm. 
Hab. Lake Mutanda, extreme 8.W. Uganda. (Robin Kemp.) 


BLAYNEYELLA, gen. nov. 


Shell thin, corneous, narrowly umbilicate, depressedly turbinate, 
transversely plicate; labrum a little reflexed. 

Genotype: &. percivali Preston. 

Generally, but not always, ornamented with a peripheral 
purplish band. 

Zingis papyracea Preston, from 8.W. Uganda, Proc. Zool. Soe. 
London, 1912, p. 185, pl. xxxii. fig. 15, may also be considered as 
belonging to Blayneyella. 


BLAYNEYELLA PERCIVALI, sp. n. (Pl. I. figs. 19@, 196, 19.) 


Shell perforate, turbinate, thin, pale yellowish brown, painted 
with a rather narrow, supersutural, reddish-purple band, which 
appears on the last whorl as a superperipheral band; whorls 5, 
the last gradually descending in front, marked with oblique, 
arcuate, irregular, crease-like riblets; suture impressed, faintly 
margined below; umbilicus moderately narrow, very deep, slightly 
overhung by the outward reflexion of the columella; columella 
eurved, diaphanous, rather broadly outwardly reflexed above, 
narrowly so below; labrum simple; aperture ovate; interior of 
shell showing the superperipheral band through the test. 

Alt. 9°5, diam. maj. 14°25, diam. min. 11°75 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 7°25, diam. 6-75 mm. 

Hab. Larogi Hills, British East Africa, (A. Blayney Percival.) 


BLAYNEYELLA KISENGIENSIS, sp.n. (PI. I. fig. 21.) 

Shell perforate, depressedly turbinate, thin, very pale reddish 
brown; whorls 54, regularly, but rather rapidly, increasing, 
marked with somewhat indistinct, oblique, radiate riblets; suture 
impressed; base of shell rather convex; umbilicus moderately 
wide, deep; coiumella outwardly expanded above, descending in 
a curve; aperture broadly sublunate. 

Alt. 8°25, diam. maj. 13°25, diam. min. 11 mm, 

Aperture: alt. 5°25, diam. 5°75 mm. 

Hab. Kisengi, Lake Kivu, German East Africa, at an altitude 
of 4500 feet. (Robin Kemp.) 


BLAYNEYELLA PURPURHOCINGTA, sp.n. (PI. I. fig. 20.) 


Shell perforate, thin, corneous, depressedly turbinate, yellowish 
brown, painted with a narrow, supersutural, reddish-purple band, 
which appears on the last whorl as a superperipheral band ; 
whorls 6, regularly increasing, marked with oblique transverse 


800 MR. H. B. PRESTON ON NEW GENERA AND 


growth-strie ; suture impressed; base of shell somewhat inflated ; 
umbilicus moderately wide and deep; columella rather outwardly 
expanded, descending in a curve, oblique below; labrum thin, 
slightly reflexed ; aperture very broadly sublunate. 

Alt. 6°5, diam. maj. 11:25, diam. min. 9°25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 5°5, diam. 5 mm. 


Hab. Nairobi, British East Africa. (A. Blayney Percival.) 


BLAYNEYELLA MICROSPIRALIS, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 18.) 


Shell allied to B. purpureocincta Preston, but differing from 
that species in its much more depressed form, more obliquely 
descending columella, and narrower and more compressed aperture, 
and finely spirally sculptured first whorl, which sculpture is only 
visible by the aid of the microscope. 

Alt. 6, diam. maj. 10°25, diam. min. 8-5 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 4°5, diam. 4°5 mm. 

Hab. British East Africa. 


LAROGIELLA, gen. nov. 


Shell umbilieate, thin, corneous, turbinate, transversely plicate ; 
labrum membranaceous. 

Genotype: Z. venatoris Preston. 

To the above genus should also be assigned :— 


Natalina permembranacea Preston, from 8.W. Uganda, Proc. 
Zool. Soc, London, 1912, p. 183, pl. xxxi. figs. 20, 20 a, & 205. 

Zingis planispira Preston, also from S.W. Uganda, t.c. p. 185, 
pl. xxxil. fig. 16. 


LAROGIELLA VENATORIS, sp.n. (PI. I. figs. 22, 226, 22.) 


Shell somewhat depressedly turbinate, thin, yellowish brown ; 
whorls 57, regularly increasing, the last angled at the periphery 
and descending in front, marked with oblique growth-plicee ; 
suture impressed, almost imperceptibly margined below ; umbilicus 
moderately wide, deep, slightly overhung by the triangular, out- 
ward expansion of the columella margin; columella margin 
descending in a curve; labrum membranaceous; aperture com- 
pressedly ovate. 

Alt. 7-5, diam. maj. 12°5, diam. min. 10-25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 5, diam. 5-5 mm. 

Hab. Larogi Hills, British East Africa, at an altitude of from 
6000 to 7000 feet. (A. Blayney Percival.) 


LAROGIELLA ANGULIFERA, sp. n. (PI. II. fig. 1.) 


Shell perforate, depressedly conic, thin, pale brown, painted 
with an indistinct, whitish, infrasutural band; whorls 5, the 
last descending in front, regularly increasing and angled at the 
periphery, marked with irregular, oblique, arcuate, transverse, 
crease-like riblets and showing traces of spiral whitish lines, 


SPECIES OF ZONITIDA FROM EQUATORIAL AFRICA, 801 


especially in the subsutural region, which latter appear to be in 
the texture of the shell and not at all in the nature of outward 
sculpture ; suture impressed ; base of shell slightly convex, rather 
more noticeably marked with the whitish textural lines than the 
rest of the shell; umbilicus moderately wide, deep; columella 
diffused upwards into a very thin, well-defined, and sinuous 
parietal callus, which reaches the upper margin of the labrum, 
curved and outwardly reflexed above, oblique and scarcely reflexed 
below; labrum simple; aperture oblique, compressedly subovate, 

Alt. 8°75, diam. maj. 13°75, diam. min. 11-25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 5°5, diam. 5°75 mm. 

Hab. Larogi Hills, British Kast Africa. (A. Blayney Percival.) 


LAROGIELLA FONTICULA, sp.n. (PI. II. fig. 3.) 


Shell perforate, thin, roundly turbinate, fulvous; whorls 5, 
regularly increasing, sculptur ed with irregular, very oblique, 
radiate, transverse plications and microscopically shagreened ; 
suture impressed ; umbilicus narrow, deep, well-like, a little over- 
hung by the outward expansion of the columella margin ; 
columella margin vitreous, broadly outwardly expanded above, 
descending in a curve ; 3 labrum simple ; aperture roundly ovate. 

Alt. 6°75, diam. maj. 10, diam. min. 8 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 5, diam. 4-5 mm. 

Hab. Lake Mutanda, 8S.W. Uganda. (Robin Kemp.) 


LAROGIELLA KOMBAENSIS, sp.n. (PI. II. fig. 2.) 


Shell perforate, thin, submembranaceous, pale yellowish brown ; 
whorls 4, regularly increasing, sculptured throughout with regular, 
oblique, somewhat arcuate, transverse, crease-like plice; suture 
impressed; base of shell moderately inflated ; umbilicus rather 
wide, deep; columella vitreous, widely outwardly reflexed above, 
descending in a very slightly oblique curve; labrum thin, acute, 
projecting a little in front; aperture ovate. 

Alt. 4°75, diam. maj. 10, diam. min. 8 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 5°25, diam. 4 mm. 

Hab. Komba, 8.W. Uganda. (Robin Kemp.) 


LAROGIELLA MALASANJIENSIS, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 23.) 

Shell somewhat depressedly turbinate, thin, pale brown; whorls 
5, regularly increasing, the last subangulate at the periphery, 
marked with oblique, arcuate, transverse plications; suture im- 
pressed; base of shell marked with very fine, wavy, revolving 
striz in.addition to the transverse sculpture ; umbilicus moderately 
wide, deep; columella descending in an oblique curve, outwardly 
expanded above; labrum thin, membranaceous; aperture broadly 
and compressedly sublunate. 

Alt. 5°25, diam. maj. 9°5, diam. min. 8°25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 4°5, diam. 3°25 mm. 

Hab, Malasanji, 8.W. Uganda. (Robin Kemp.) 


802 MR. H. B. PRESTON ON NEW GENERA AND 


NAKURUELLA, gen. nov. 


Shell umbilicate, turbinate, thin, corneous, transversely plicate, 
with broad aperture. 


Genotype: Zingis bullata Preston *. 


NaAkURUELLA soror, sp.n. (PI. I. figs. 13a, 136, 13¢.) 


Shell differing from WV. bullata Preston in its more depressed 
form, in having : a whorl less, in its still narrower umbilicus, and 
sisiilive more oblique and much broader a perture; the basal 
portion of the labrum is also slightly reflexed. 

Alt. 11, diam. maj. 17, diam. min. 13 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 8°5, diam. 8°75 mm. 

Hab. Burunga, Mount Mikeno, Belgian Congo, at an altitude 
of 6000 feet. (Robin Kemp.) 


MIKENOBLLA, gen. nov. 


Shell thin, corneous, narrowly perforate, with somewhat elevated 
spire, transversely plicate only, labrum acute. 

Genotype: J. ahena Preston. 

Species which should probably be referred to this genus are :— 


Zingis gregorii Smith, from Mt. Kenia, Proc. Malac. Soe. 
Lond. vol. i. p. 164. 

Zingis aurea Preston, from British East Africa, Rev. Zool. 
Africaine, Bruxelles, vol. iii. p. 47, pl. v. fig. 6. 


MIKENOELLA AHENA, sp. n. (PI. II. figs. 26 a, 265, 26.) 


Shell perforate, conically turbinate, very thin, pale yellowish 
brown; whorls 5, regularly increasing, the last large, obsoletely 
transversely plicate, the plicee being more noticeable in the sub- 
sutural region ; suture impressed, very narrowly margined below ; 
base of shell inflated ; utubilicus narrow, deep, partly concealed 
by the outward reflexion of the columella margin; columella 
margin broadly and membranaceously outwardly reflexed above, 
almost vertically descending in a gentle curve; labrum acute ; 
aperture ovate. 

Alt. 11-25, diam. maj. 13, diamn. min. 11 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 7°25, diam. 5 mm. 


Hab. Burunga, Mount Mikeno, Belgian Congo, at an altitude of 
6000 feet. (Robin Kemp.) 


MIKENOSLLA ELEVATA, sp.n. (PI. IJ. fig. 25.) 


Shell perforate, inflatedly turbinate, thin, yellowish brown, 
painted just above the suture and periphery with a broad spiral 
band of purplish red, below which occurs a peripheral narrow 
band of a creamy colour; whorls 53, regularly increasing, the last 
inflated, marked only, especially on the upper whorls, with fine 
oblique growth-plice; suture impressed; base of shell inflated, 


# Rey. Zool. Africaine, Bruxelles, yol. ui. pp. 47-48, pl. v. fig. 4. 


SPECIES OF ZONITIDA: FROM EQUATORIAL AFRICA, 803 


marked with radiate arcuate growth-plications and discoloured 
with a purplish tinge in the circum-umbilical region ; perforation 
narrow, deep, slightly overhung by the outward expansion of the 
columella; columella triangularly outwardly expanded above, 
descending in a gentle curve, the margins slightly converging, 
receding below; aperture subovate. 

Alt. 11, diam. maj. 12°5, diam. min. 10°25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 6, diam. 5-75 mm. 

Hab. Uarogi Hills, British Hast Africa, at an altitude of 
between 6000 and 7000 feet. (A. Blayney Percival.) 


MIKENOBLLA NEGLECTA, sp. n. (PI. II. fig. 27.) 


Shell globosely turbinate, narrowly perforate, thin, unicolorous, 
pale yellowish brown; whorls 53, regularly increasing, marked 
only with slightly arcuate, transverse growth-plice ; base of shell 
convex; umbilicus very narrow, almost covered by the outward 
reflexion of the columella; columella broadly outwardly reflexed 
above, very narrowly so below; aperture subovate. 

Alt. 11, diam. maj. 13°25 (nearly) mm. 

Aperture: alt. 7-5, diam. 6°5 mm. 

Hab. Kiduha, $.W. Uganda. (Robin Kemp.) 


URGUESSELLA, gen. nov. 


Shell perforate, thin, corneous, depressed, hirsute, the last 
whorl descending rather rapidly in front. 

Genotype: U. urguessensis Preston. 

The following two species should undoubtedly be included in 
Urguessella :— 


Trachycystis nigrotincta Preston, from British Hast Africa, Rev. 
Zool. Africaine, vol. i. p. 325, pl. xvii. fig. 9. 

T. fusco-olivacea Smith, from Nyassaland, Proc. Zool. Soe. 
London, 1899, p. 585. 


URGUESSELLA URGUESSENSIS, sp. n. (PI. III. figs. 25, 25 a, 25 6.) 


Shell perforate, turbinate, with subplanulate spire, yellowish 
brown, covered with a hirsute periostracum, the hairs being about 
one millimetre in length, yellow in colour, placed at a moderate 
distance apart and arranged in very oblique rows; whorls 43, 
regularly increasing, the last descending in front; suture 1m- 
pressed ; base of shell somewhat convex ; umbilicus rather narrow, 
deep; columella triangularly outwardly expanded above, de- 
scending in a rounded curve; labrum white, thin, very narrowly 
outwardly expanded and reflexed; aperture somewhat rect- 
angularly ovate, on the parietal wall; just without the aperture, 
where the hairs no longer appear, the surface of the shell is seen 
to be marked with transverse pustulous riblets. 

Alt. 5:25, diam. maj. 9°25, diam. min. 8 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 3°75, diam. 4 mm. 

Hab. Urguess, British East Africa. (A. Blayney Percival.) 


804 MR. H. B, PRESTON ON NEW GENERA AND 


URGUESSELLA ESAU, sp. n. (PI. III. fig. 26.) 


Shell allied to U. urguessensis Preston, but differing con- 
siderably from that species in its thinner texture, smaller size, 
more reddish colour, less planulate spire, subangulate last whorl, 
and much finer and shorter hairs, which are arranged in very 
oblique rows, but running at a much less acute angle to the 
suture than in U. wrguessensis; the columella is also higher and 
more angularly curved, while the aperture is roundly ovate. 

Alt. 4°75, diam. maj. 9, diam. min. 7‘25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 3°75, diam. 3°75 mm. 

Hab. Urguess, British East Africa. (A. Blayney Percival.) 


URGUESSELLA CAPILLATA, sp. n. (PI. III. fig. 28.) 


Shell suborbicular, depressed, with almost planulate spire, thin, 
pale reddish brown; whorls 4, regularly increasing, the last 
descending in front, sculptured with corrugated, closely-set, 
obliquely arcuate, transv erse plice, bearing at intervals broad 
bristly hairs; suture impressed; base of shell slightly convex ; 
umbilicus moderately wide, deep; columella broadly outwardly 
reflexed above and diffused into a thin, ill-defined, glassy, parietal 
callus, descending in a vertical curve; aperture obliquely sub- 
lunate. 

Alt. 3°25, diam. maj. 7, diam. min. 6 mim. 

Aperture: alt. 3, diam. 2°5 mm. 

Hab. Burunga, Mount Mikeno, Belgian Congo, at an altitude 
of 6000 feet. (Robin Kemp.) 


URGUESSELLA CUTICULARIS, sp. n. (PI. ITI. fig. 27.) 


Shell thin, suborbicular, with depressed spire, covered with a 
shortly hispid, dark Neowen periostracum ; whorls 43, regularly 
increasing, marked with very oblique, arcuate, transverse plica- 
tions, the last whorl angulate at the periphery ; suture impressed ; 
base of shell rather inflated ; umbilicus rather broad, open, deep ; 
columella broadly outwardly expanded above, descending in an 
oblique curve ; labrum simple; aperture subrectangular. 

Alt. 4, diam. maj. 7, diam. min. 6 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 3°5, diam. 3 mm. 

Hab. Malasanji, 8.W. Uganda. (Robin Kemp.) 


TROCHOZONITES BUHAMBAENSIS, sp. n. (Pl. II. fig. 23.) 


Shell acutely conic, pale brown, somewhat polished ; whorls 7, 
slightly convex, the first three somewhat slowly increasing in 
breadth, smooth, the remainder rather rapidly increasing, sculp- 
tured with coarse, oblique, transverse riblets, the last whorl 
strongly carinate at the periphery ; suture impressed, very 
narrowly margined; base of shell nearly smooth; umbilicus 
narrow and very deep, partly concealed by the reflexion of the 
columella margin ; columella margin outwardly expanded above, 


SPECIES OF ZONITIDA FROM EQUATORIAL AFRICA. 805 


vertically descending ; labrum acute, simple; aperture irregularly 
subrectangular. 

Alt. 7, diam. maj. 6°25, diam. min. 5°25 mm, 

Aperture: alt. 2°75, diam. 2°25 mm. 

Hab. Buhamba, near Lake Kivu, Belgian Congo. (Robin 
Kemp.) 


TROCHOZONITES EXPATRIATA, sp. n. (PI. II. fig. 21.) 


Shell conical, with obtuse apex and very slightly constrieted 
sides, very thin, reddish brown, glossy ; whorls 6, the last two 
rather convex, the last acutely carinate at the periphery, sculp- 
tured with course, oblique growth-ridges ; suture faintly incised, 
narrowly eallously margined above ; base of shell nearly planulate ; 
umbilicus very narrow, almost entirely concealed by the outward 
expansion of the columella; columella margin descending in a 
very slight and very oblique curve; labrum sunple; aperture 
subrectangular. 

Alt. 6, diam. maj. 6°5, diam. min. 6 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 1-5, diam. 3 mm. 

Hab. Burunga, Mount Mikeno, Belgian Congo, at an altitude 
of 6000 feet. (Robin Kemp.) 

In form much resembling the species of the genus inhabiting 
West Africa. 


TROCHOZONITES KEMPI, sp. nu. (PI. II. fig. 22.) 


Shell moderately small, conic, with very laterally compressed 
spire, in dead condition yellowish grey, somewhat iridescent, 
polished, shining; whorls 64, the first three and a half convex, 
the remainder flattened, sloping, the last acutely carinate at the 
periphery, sculptured with closely-set, oblique, transverse strive ; 
suture linear, very narrowly margined above; base of shell 
slightly convex; umbilicus narrow, deep; columella somewhat 
outwardly expanded, obliquely descending; labrum simple ; 
aperture curvedly subrectangular. 

Alt. 5:25, diam. maj. 6°75, diam. min. 6°5 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 2, diam. 3 mm. 

Hab. Buhamba, near Lake Kivu, Belgian Congo. (Robin 
Kemp.) 


TROCHOZONITES SUTURALIS, sp.n. (PI. II. fig. 24.) 


Shell rimate, turritely turbinate, somewhat laterally compressed 
below, thin, olivaceous; whorls 61, regularly increasing, smooth 
but for very oblique, transverse growth-lines ; suture impressed, 
bearing, especially on the lower part of the shell, an erect, soine- 
what callously thickened ridge, which appears as a carina on the 
last whorl; perforation very narrow, almost concealed by the 
exceedingly narrow outward reflexion of the columella ; columella 
thickened, outwardly reflexed and vertically descending above, 
obliquely descending below, very slightly inwardly bulging in the 


806 MR. H. B. PRESTON ON NEW GENERA AND 


median region ; labrum acute, receding below, advancing above ; 
aperture subrectangular. 

Alt. 7, diam. maj. 6°25, diam. min. 6 mm. 

Aperture: alt, 3, diam. 2°5 mm. 

Hab. Urguess, British East Africa. (A. Blayney Percival.) 


PERCIVALIA, gen. nov. 


Shell thin, perforate, compactly coiled, turbinate, sculptured 
on the spire with transverse wrinkle-like plications, which are 
absent on the bases. 

Genotype: P. nyiroénsis Preston. 


PERCIVALIA NYIROENSIS, sp.n. (Pl. L. figs. 12 a, 12d.) 


Shell depressedly turbinate, polished, shining, pale greenish 
yellow, painted with a broad, supersutural, spiral band of chestnut, 
which appears as a superperipheral band on the last whorl ; 
whorls 6, the first two slightly exserted, the remainder flattish, 
the last angular at the periphery, sculptured with oblique, trans- 
verse, arcuate, wrinkle like plice; suture impressed, narrowly 
margined above; base of shell somewhat convex, sculptured only 
with very fine, indistinct, wavy, spiral striz; umbilicus very 
narrow, partly concealed by the twisted columella; columella 
somewhat sharply twisted above, very obliquely descending ; 
labrum simple; aperture rather obliquely sublunate. 

Alt. 6, diam. maj. 10, diam. min. 9°25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 5, diam. 4°75 mm. 

Hab. Mount Nyiro, to the south of Lake Rudolph, at an 
altitude of 8300 feet. (A. Blayney Percival.) 


LEDOULXIA CRASSIPLICATA, sp.n. (PI. I. figs. 1, 1a.) 


Shell depressedly turbinate, thin, light brown; whorls 5, 
regularly increasing, convex, shouldered above, sculptured with 
coarse, rather distant, obliquely arcuate, somewhat acute plications, 
the last whorl acutely and callously carinate at the periphery ; 
suture impressed, narrowly callously margined above; base of 
shell moderately convex, smooth, without sculpture ; umbilicus 
open, deep, sculptured with somewhat distant, wavy, revolving 
strie within ; columella margin broadly outwardly expanded and 
vertically descending above, curved below; labrum simple ; 
aperture obliquely subrectangular. 

Alt. 7, diam. maj. 11:5, diam. min. 10 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 5, diam. 4°5 mm. 

Hab. Forest to the north of Mount Kenia, British East Africa. 
(A. Blayney Percival.) 


LEDOULXIA DECUSSATA, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 7.) 


Shell with roundly turbinate spire, pale brownish yellow above, 
the colouring concentrating in an ill-defined, supersutural, reddish- 
brown band, showing traces of having been covered with a 


SPECIES OF ZONITIDE FROM EQUATORIAL AFRICA, 807 


chestnut periostracum; whorls 6, regularly increasing, the 
extreme apex smooth, the second whorl sculptured only with 
slightly distant and very oblique, coarse, transverse stiie, the 
remaining whorls sculptured with fine, closely-set, transverse 
striz crossed by fine spirals, thus presenting a finely decussate 
appearance, the last whorl rather strongly carinate at the 
periphery ; base of shell polished, shining, dark brownish yellow, 
somewhat granulate and sculptured with fine, wavy, moderately 
closely-set, revolving strie; suture impressed, very narrowly 
callously margined above; umbilicus rather narrow, deep; 
columella outwardly expanded in the upper region, vertically 
descending above, then bulging obliquely inwards and very gently 
and obliquely curved below; labrum simple; aperture broadly 
and somewhat compressedly sublunate. 

Alt. 11, diam. maj. 16, diam. min. 14°75 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 7, diam. 7°75 mm. 

Hab. Larogi Hills, British East Africa. (A. Blayney Percival.) 


LEDOULXIA ELGONENSIS, sp.n. (PI. I. fig. 4.) 


Shell allied to Martensia jenynsi Pfr.*, of which it may 
ultimately prove to be a subspecies; it is, however, much more 
depressed than is that species, the spiral sculpture, both on the 
base and on the whorls, is also more developed, and the columella 
descends much more obliquely. 

Alt. 7°75, diam. maj. 13, diam. min. 11:25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 5°75, diam. 5°75 mm. 

Hab. Mount Elgon, Uganda. (C. W. Woodhouse.) 


LEDOULXIA EUSSOENSIS, sp.n. (PI. I. fig. 2.) 


Shell rather solid, perforate, somewhat depressedly turbinate, 
cream-coloured, flecked here and there with greyish black and 
ornamented with a very narrow, interrupted, peripheral band of 
the same; whorls 6, sculptured with very closely-set, coarse, 
oblique, arcuate striz; the last whorl obtusely angled at the peri- 
phery ; base of shell marked with lines of growth and sculptured 
with irregular, wavy, revolving, scratch-like striz ; suture well 
impressed ; umbilicus narrow, “deep, slightly overhung by the 
outward expansion of the Golumella: columella descending in a 
curve; labrum simple; aperture obliquely sublunate. 

Alt. 13°75, diam. maj. 19, diam. min. 16°5 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 9, diam. 8 mm. 

Hab. Eusso Nyiro, British East Africa. (Robin Kemp.) 


LEDOULXIA JINGAENSIS, sp.n. (Pl. I. fig. 6.) 


Shell broadly turbinate, thin, straw-colour, painted with a 
narrow, supersutural, spiral band of reddish purple ; whorls 6, 
regularly i increasing, rather convex, the last acutely and callously 
carinate at the periphery ; sculptured with fine, closely-set, 


* Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1845, p. 131. 


808 ME. H. B. PRESTON ON NEW GENERA AND 


oblique, slightly arcuate, transverse costule ; suture impressed, 
narrowly callously margined above; base of shell moderately 
convex, somewhat polished, marked with lines of growth and 
sculptared with fine, wavy, revolving strie; umbilicus narrow, 
deep; columella descending in an oblique curve, outwardly ex- 
panded above and diffused into a very thin, almost imperceptible, 
well-defined, parietal callus, which reaches the upper margin of 
the labrum; labrum simple, acute; aperture obliquely, com- 
pressedly sublunate. 

Alt, 9, diam. maj. 14, diam. min. 12°25 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 5°75, diam. 6°25 mm. 

Hab. Jinga on Lake Victoria Nyanza, 5.W. Uganda; also 
taken at Entebbe and Kampala in the same district. (Robin 
Kemp.) 


LEDOULXIA LEVISTRIATA (Preston*), var. NYERIENSIS, var. 0. 
(Bi ne: 3.) 


Shell differing from the typical form in its rather broader 
shape and proportionately slightly less acuminate spire, and in 
the colour, which in the present variety is of a yellowish hue. 

Alt. 12, diam. maj. 19°75, diam, min. 17 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 8°5, diam. 9°5 mm. 

Hab. Nyeri, British East Africa, (Robin Kemp.) 


LEDOULXIA ADJACENS, sp.n. (PI. I. fig. 8.) 


Shell differing from Z. levistriata (Preston) in its more depressed 
form, rather narrower perforation, and slightly broader aperture ; 
the transverse sculpture on the whorls is finer and the spiral 
sculpture on the base rather coarser and considerably more 
distant ; the colour of the present species is yellowish brown, and 
the carina and sutural margination not so marked as in JZ, levi- 
striata. 

Alt. 11°5, diam, maj. 18, diam. min. 15°5 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 8, diam. 8°25 mm. 

Hab. Mount Kenangop, Aberdare Range, British East Africa. 
(Robin Kemp.) 


LEDOULXIA MARSABITENSIS, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 5.) 


Shell allied to Martensia permanens Smithy, but smaller, 
darker in colour, more narrowly umbilicate, more closely and 
coarsely sculptured, and with proportionately higher spire than 
has that species. 

Alt. 9°75, diam. maj. 15, diam. min. 13°5 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 7, diam. 6°25 mm. 

Hab. Northern slopes of Mount Marsabit, British East Africa. 
(A. Blayney Percival.) 


x * Martensia levistriata Preston, Rev. Zool. Africaine, Bruxelles, iii. p. 48, pl. v. 
g. 2. 
“+ J. Malac. viii. p. 94. 


SPECIES OF ZONITIDE FROM EQUATORIAL AFRICA, 809 


FALLOONELLA, gen. nov. 


Shell depressed or depressedly conoid, perforate, closely and 
almost laminiferously striate above, polished on the base, suturally 
callously margined, and carinate at the periphery. 

Genotype: /. exquisita Preston. 


FALLOONELLA EXQUISITA, sp. n. (PI. I. figs. 9, 9 a, 96.) 


Shell depressedly turbinate, suborbicular, thin, somewhat 
diaphanous and shining, chestnut-coloured ; sino 5 1, the earlier 
whorls smooth, the later whorls sculptured with moderately fine 
and very closely-set, oblique, arcuate costule; suture bearing a 
sulcate raised ridge, which appears on the last whorl asa yellowish 
raised peripheral carina; base of shell polished, shining, showing 
radiate growth-ridges and sculptured only with very fine, wavy, 
and closely-set revolving striz; umbilical area greenish olive, 
the perforation being deep and very narrow ; columella oblique, 
somewhat curved, very narrowly outwardly expanded above, and 
diffusing into a thin, minutely granular, outwardly spreading, 
well-defined callus, which reaches the upper margin of the labrum ; 
labrum simple, acute ; ; aperture obliquely and somewhat br oadly 
sublunate. 

Alt. 5, diam. maj. 9°75, diam. min. 8°75 mm, 

Aperture: alt. 4:25, diam. 4°5 mm. 

Hab. Urguess, British Kast Africa. (A. Blayney Percival.) 


FALLOONELLA EXQUISITA GUDEI, subsp. n. (PI. I. fig. 10.) 


Shell differing from typical /. exquisita Preston in having one 
whorl more, in its less depressed form, rather finer cblique 
costule on the spire, and in the sutural ridge which is also con- 
siderably finer, the perforation is rather less narrow, the columella 
is less curved and more oblique, and the aperture is rather 
narrower in proportion to its height. 

Alt. 6°75, diam. maj. 11 (nearly), diam. min. 9°75 mm. 

Aperture: alt. 5°25, diam. 5 mm. 

Hab. Larogi Hills, British Hast Africa. (A. Blayney Percival.) 


FALLOONELLA LAROGIENSIS, sp.n. (PI. I. figs. lla, 116.) 


Shell perforate, depressedly turbinate, dark livid flesh-colour 
above, covered with a chestnut periostracum ; whorls 54, flattish, 
regularly, but not rapidly, increasing, the ‘first two and a half 
spirally sulcate, the remainder sculptured with moderately coarse, 
not very resular, but wavy, oblique, transverse riblets, presenting 
through a lens a slightly corrugated appearance ; suture lightly 
impressed, bearing a somewhat coarse, thread-like, cream-coloured 
ridge, which appears as a rather sharp peripheral carina on the 
last whorl; base of shell slightly polished, whitish yellow, sculp- 
tured with distant, revolving, microscopic, scratch-like striz ; 

erforation narrow, deep; columella triangularly, outwardly ex- 
panded above, obliquely descending in a slight curve; labrum 


810 MR. H. B. PRESTON ON NEW GENERA AND 


simple, receding below ; aperture obliquely and depressedly 
crescentic, 

Alt. 6, diam. maj. 11°75, diam. min. 10 mm. 

Aperture : alt. 5:25, diame 5 mm. 

Hab. Larogi Hills, British East Africa, at an altitude of from 
6000 to 7000. feet. (A. Blayney Percival.) 


EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. 


Pram Te 
Hess eem solace Ledoulwia crassiplicata, sp. n. 

2 + eussoensis, Sp. 1. 

3. “- levistriata (Preston), var. nyeriensis, var. 1. 

4, + elganensis, Sp. 0. 

5 3 marsabitensis, Sp. i. 

6 +) Jingaénsis, sp. 1. 

is bs decussata, sp. 0. 

8. 7 adjacens, sp. Nn. 
9,9a,9b. Falloonella exquisita, sp. n. 

10. a A gudei, subsp. n. 

iil ays Wallop 4 lavogiensis, sp. N. 


124,126. Percivalia nyiroénsis, sp. n. 
13.4,136,13¢. Nakuruélla soror, sp. n. 
14, Burungaélla mutandana, sp. 0. 


15. or imperforata, sp. 0. 
16. 3% buhambaénsis, sp. 0. 
17 a, 176, 17 ¢. Bs oscitans, sp. N. 
18. Blayneyella microspiralis, sp. n. 
19 a,19 6,19. Ff percivali, sp. n. 
20 5 purpureocincta, sp. N. 
21. xy kisengiensis, Sp. ll. 
22,22 6, 22c. Larogiella venatoris, sp. n. 
23. malasanjiensis, Sp. i. 
Prate II. 
Figs il Larogiella angulifera, sp. n. 
2. a kombaénsis, sp. ii. 
3. ” fonticula, sp. n. 
4, Africarion oscitans, sp. N. 
5a,5b. EHlgonella flavidula, sp. n. 
6a, 6b. a angustior, sp. 1. 
Wl i, Wh (i 5 discolorata, sp. n. 
8a, 8b. 2 oribates, sp. 0. 
9a,9b, 9c. 50 euloteformis, sp. ni. 
10a, 106. 9 robini, Sp. 0. 
lla, 116. “3 brunned, sp. N. 
12a, 12.6. sobrina, sp. 0. 
13. Afr icarion copiosa, sp. 0. 
14, 3 marsabitensis, sp. N. 
15. 5 orestias, sp. Nn. 
16. 6 kiduhaénsis, sp. . 
ie o spatiosa, sp. n. 
18. = kagambahensis, sp. n. 
19. x tenebrosa, sp. n. 
20. concavospira, Sp. I. 
21. Trochozonites expatriata, sp. n. 
22. 53 kempi, sp. 0. 
23: at buhambaeénsis, sp. 0. 
24. suturalis, sp. n. 
25. Mikenoélla elevata, sp. Nl. 
26 a, 26 b, 26.¢. . ahena, sp. 0. 
27. BA neglecta, sp. nl. 


St ee. 


SPECIES OF ZONITIDA FROM EQUATORIAL AFRICA, 


5. 
Figs. 


2 VS OU go bo 


a 
[2 


i 
$2 NS? OU Go bo 


to bo bo bo 
SSS 


24, 


Prate III, 


Gudeélla inclinans, sp. n. 


33 


usitata, sp. n. 
multistriata, sp. 1. 
tribulationis, sp. n. 
pallidior, sp. n. 
bartaénsis, sp. n. 
gerstenbrandti, sp. n. 
inclinans, sp. n. 
consobrina, sp. ni. 
kampalaénsis, sp. n. 
mukandaénsis, sp. i. 


var. mutandana, var. n. 


woodhousei, sp. n. 
densesculpta, sp. n. 
iridescens, sp. Nn. 
masakaénsis, sp. n. 
urguessensis, Sp. N. 
consueta, Sp. N. 
elgonensis, sp. n. 
araned, sp. n. 
inflata, sp.n. 
marsabitensis, sp. n. 
mime, sp. Nn. 
nemorum, sp. n. 


25, 25 a, 25 5. Urguessella urguessensis, Sp. ni. 


26. 
27, 
28. 


esau, Sp. n. 
cuticularis, sp. n. 
capillata, sp. n. 


Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. LV. 55 


811 


wn 


P.Z.S.1914. BOULENGER. 2k. 


J. Green photo del. 


1. ATELOPUS SPURRELLI. 2. LEPIDOBLEPHARIS INTERMEDIUS. 
3. POLYCHRUS SPURRELLI. 


at 


abt be t 


P.Z.S.1914 . BOULENGER, Bile 


J. Green photo del. 


2, HOMALOCRANIUM NIGRUM. 


1 LEPTOPHIS BREVIOR:. 


3h JEVL/MIES) SIP ORR VEIL IC I 


ON BATRACHIANS AND REPTILES FROM COLOMBIA, 


813 


44. On a second Collection of Batrachians and Reptiles 
made by Dr. H: G. F. Spurrell, F.Z.S., in the Choco, 
Colombia. By G. A. BouLencer, F.RS., F.Z.8.* 


[Received May 20, 1914; Read June 9, 1914. ] 
(Plates I. & II.+) 


INDEX. 


Page 


Geographical Zoology: Choco, Colombia, Batrachians and 


Systematic :— 
Atelopus spurrelli, sp. n. 


Lepidoblepharis intermedius, sp. NM. ......... see ceeeee eee cee ees 
JEQUGCHUFOIS SLU RAND S05 Wa ses 420 decaas S50ce0 Bac do0kod 630800 50cod 
JEG DRO DOIS: WRBTTOR, Sido TWasscace o6ho00 e50n60 06800600 ee dad agaGon cae 
JOT MHDORTRIOUD TOOGIPOHOs SDS 25 coc doo Lou nooiscco09 050090090 GooHo 
J HIGDS CP DOUIRGUUG:, S061 book née cca dendsedon sou occ eee see op seEo Hepa dTORC 


813 


813 
814 
814 
815 
816 
817 


Since the publication of the account of Dr. Spurrell’s Collection 
of Batrachians and Reptiles from the Choco, the British 
Museum has received a further important series of these animals 
presented by the same energetic collector. All were obtained at 
or near Pena Lisa, Condoto. In the following list I have only 
enumerated the species not mentioned in the previous list. 


BATRACHIA. 


CAUDATA. 


1. SPELERPES PARVIPES Peters. 
ECAUDATA. 

2. BuFo CONIFERUS Cope. 

3. HyYLopEs RANIFORMIS Bler. 


4, ATELOPUS SPURRELLI, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 1.) 


Habit slender. Head a little longer than broad, one-third the 


len 


eth from snout to vent; snout obtusely pointed, prominent, 


obliquely truncate, a little longer than the eye; loreal region 
nearly vertical, slightly concave; nostril near the tip of the 
snout ; interorbital space as broad as the upper eyelid. 
limb slender, as long as the trunk; fingers webbed at the base, 
with swollen tips; first finger very short; a flat palmar tubercle ; 
no subarticular tubercles, Hind limb slender; the tibio-tarsal 


* Published by permission of the Trustees of the British Museum. 


+ For explanation of the Plates see p. 817. 
+ P.Z.S. 1913, p. 1019. 


) 


5* 


Fore 


814 MR. G. A. BOULENGER ON BATRACHIANS 


articulation reaches the eye; tibia half the length of head and 
body ; toes half-webbed, inner very short but perfectly distinct ; 
the tips blunt; metatarsal and subarticular tubercles very 
indistinct. Green above, with small black spots and large 
symmetrical black markings, viz.: a streak on the canthus 
rostralis; an X on the head and between the shoulders, the 
anterior branches extending on the upper eyelids, the posterior 
confluent with a lateral band which is expanded on the temple 
and extends to the groin; a spade-shaped figure on the sacral 
region; a pair of large spots above the waist, and cross-bars on 
the limbs; lower parts white, with round black spots. Male with 
brown rugosities on the inner finger. 

From snout to vent 24 mm. 

A single specimen. 


REPTILIA. 
CHELONIA. 


1. CHELYDRA ROSSIGNONI Bocourt. 


This species was only known from Southern Mexico, Guatemala, 
and Western Ecuador. 


LACERTILIA. 
2. THECADACTYLUS RAPICAUDA Houtt. 


3. LEPIDOBLEPHARIS INTERMEDIUS, sp. n. (PI. I. fig. 2.) 


Scaling as in LZ. peracce Blgr., form more as in L. feste Peracea. 
Granules of upper parts very small, largest on the snout. Snout 
pointed, much longer than the orbit; rostral with median cleft, 
and concave above, as in the two other species; symphysial 
likewise very large, with two clefts behind; five upper and four 
lower labials, first very large. Brown above, with darker and 
lighter variegations; a whitish streak across the nape ; lower 
parts pale brown, throat whitish. 


Motaleleng thie. on...) seen, eeeeees 63 mm. 
ISIGAVUL Sons coc eee ee annem 8" 5, 
Wradithvotaheads. 4... 45, ei Ge ee 
TBACGIWfe\ Seen, cree ee ee ee 2 Joes 
ore shim lyases. eats San; 
Liman tees Batraoys. ates. a Tel 
TOTES 2 Co Skee es ere meaner 34, 


Two specimens. 
4. ANOLIS PALMERI Bley. 


5. PoLYCHRUS SPURRELLI, sp.n, (PI. I. figs. 3, 3a.) 


Snout obtusely pointed ; nostril equally distant from the orbit 
and from the tip of the snout ; eye-opening nearly as large as the 


AND REPTILES FROM COLOMBIA. 815 


tympanum : upper head-scales smooth or feebly striated ; scales of 
supraorbital semicircles in contact with each other in the middle 
or separated by one series of scales; supraocular scales small ; 
labials striated, five upper and four lower to below centre of eye; 
symphysial with a median cleft posteriorly. Gular scales much 
larger than ventrals, feebly striated: no gular denticulation or 
erest. Scales on body feebly unicarinate, dorsals a little larger 
than laterals and ventrals. Limbs moderately elongate, the 
scales feebly unicarinate. 12 to 15 femoral pores on each side. 
Tail very long and round, with rather strongly unicarinate scales. 
Reddish or purplish brown, posterior part of belly and anal region 
greenish ; A-shaped darker cross-bands may be present on the 
body ; a blackish horizontal line behind the eye and another, 
oblique, from below the centre of the eye; base of tail and base of 
thigh with a white streak. 


Mo taller et ligesaenersn teem a i: 360 mm. 
SE ICA\G aaocee Seas cach neee agen ere nao D3) |) 
Width of head ......... SR SOR eae. 
IB Od, Sea ceeeaecesien eu h yatta palsies One 
Roney limnily irae aun at verre Nar. 5s ON res 
IB Ghee lian) Oeea so ie One Aneel cts Seas 
ARs ees ney ease aerate aoe ean QO 


Two female specimens. 


6. IGUANA TUBERCULATA Laur. 


OPHIDIA. 


7. Boa mmeERATOR Daud. 

8. EPIcRATES CENCHRIS L, 

9. DRYMOBIUS BODDAERTII Sentz. 
10. Purynonax Pa@crLonotus Gthr. 
11. Spinores PuLLATUS L. 


12. SprmorEs MEGALOLEPIS Gthr. 


This rare snake is only known from N.W. Ecuador and 
S.W. Colombia, where specimens were obtained by Mr. Palmer. 


13. Cotuser corais L. 


14. LepropHis BREvioR, sp.n. (PI. II, figs. 1, 1a.) 


Rostral a little broader than deep, just visible from above ; 
internasals as long as broad, a little shorter than the preefrontals ; 
frontal once and three-fourths as long as broad, as long as its 
distance from the end of the snout, shorter than the parietals ; 


816 MR. G. A. BOULENGER ON BATRACHIANS 


nasal elongate, entire ; no loreal; przefrontal in contact with the 
second and third upper labials ; one preocular, in contact with 
the frontal ; two postoculars; temporals 1 + 2; eight upper 
labials, fourth and fifth entering the eye; five lower labials 
in contact with the anterior chin-shields, which are shorter than 
the posterior. Scales in 15 rows, finely striated and strongly 
keeled, the two outer rows smooth. Ventrals feebly angulate 
laterally, 139; anal divided; subcaudals 127. Scales partly 
green partly brownish, with golden sheen; upper lip white; a 
black line on each side of the head, above the labialis, passing 
through the eye; lower parts pinkish, with mother-of-pearl 
sheen. 

Total length 580 mm.; tail 245. 

A single female specimen. 

Well distinguished, among the species with keeled scales and 
no loreal, by the low number of ventral shields. 


15. XENODON COLUBRINUS Gthr. 


16. RwApInmA DECORATA Gthr. 


A young specimen, referred with some doubt to this species. 
17. Oxyruopus PeroLartius L, 

18. RuiNoBotHRYUM LENTIGINOSUM Scop. 

19. OXYBELIS BREVIROSTRIS Cope. 

20. OXYBELIS ACUMINATUS Wied. 


21. HoMALOcRANIUM NIGRUM, sp.n. (PI. II. figs. 2, 2 a.) 


Eye two-fifths the length of the snout. Rostral nearly twice as 
broad as deep, scarcely visible from above; internasals half as 
long as the preefrontals ; frontal pentagonal, a little longer than 
broad, more than twice as broad as the supraocular, a little 
longer than its distance from the end of the snout, much shorter 
than the parietals; nostril between the nasals, the posterior in 
contact with the preocular ; a single postocular ; temporals 1+1 ; 
seven upper labials, third and fourth entering the eye ; first lower 
labial in contact with its fellow behind the symphysial; four 
lower jabials in contact with the anterior chin-shields, which are 
longer than the posterior. Scales in 15 rows. Ventrals 143 ; 
anal divided ; subcaudals 63. Black above and beneath ; a pair 
of round yellow spots close together on the occiput; a larger, 
oblique spot on each side of the latter, behind the angle of the 
mouth; a narrow, oblique yellow spot on the fifth and sixth 
upper labials, and a very small round one on the second upper 
labial, 

Total length 175 mm. ; tail 48. 


AND REPTILES FROM COLOMBIA, 817 


22. ELAPS SPURRELLI, sp.n. (PI. IT. figs. 3, 3a.) 


Hye nearly as long as its distance from the mouth. Rostral 
much broader than deep, scarcely visible from above; frontal 
broader than the supraocular, once and a half as long as broad, 
longer than its distance from the end of the snout, shorter than 
the parietals ; latter as long as their distance from the end of 
the snout ; one pre-and two postoculars ; temporals 1+1; seven 
upper labials, third a little deeper but not larger than the fourth, 
third and fourth entering the eye ; four lower labials in contact 
with the anterior chin-shields, which are as long as the posterior. 
Scales in 15 rows. Ventrals 232; anal divided; subcaudals 36. 
52 black annuli separated by white areas on the body and by red 
on the tail; the first annulus, on the nape, much broader than 
the others, which are narrower than the white interspaces on the 
belly and broader on the back ; a few small black spots between 
the black rings on the back; sides of head, as far back as the 
second temporal and the middle of the parietal, black, with a 
white spot on the second, third, and fourth upper labials ; a white 
middle line on the head, forming a { with a broad white bar 
across the occiput. 

Total length 230 mm. ; tail 20. 

A single female specimen. 


23. LACHESIS SCHLEGELIL Berth. 


EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. 


Prate I. 


10h, il Atelopus spurrelli, p. 813. Nat. size, upper and lower views. 
2. Lepidoblepharis intermedius, p. 814. 14 nat. size. 
3,3a. Polychrus spurrelli, p.814, Side view of head and anterior part of body, 
nat, size, and upper view of head, 13 nat. size. 


Prats IT, 


Figs.1, la. Leptophis brevior, p. 815. Upper view of head and anterior part of 
body, nat. size, and side view of head, 2. 
2,2a, Homalocranium nigrum, p. 816. Upper view of head and anterior part 
of body, X 2, and side view, X 3. 
3,3. Hlaps spurrelli, p.817. Upper and lower views of head and anterior 
part of body, X 2, and side view, X 3. 


P.Z.S. 1914, CUNNINGTON. PI. 


W.A.C, photo. London Stereoscopic Co., imp. 


1-3. LEBRNAEOGERA] DIGE RACEPRALA: 
Acts. es HAR LOGE rinAlAe 8, 9 LilEMNOGCEFPH AEA 


ON PARASITIC EUCOPEPODA FROM TANGANYIKA. 819 


45. Zoological Results of the Third Tanganyika Expedition, 
conducted by Dr. W. A. Cunnington, 1904-1905.— 
Report on the Parasitic Hucopepoda. By Winiiam A. 
Cunnineton, M.A., Ph.D., F.Z.S. 


[Received May 4, 1914: Read June 9, 1914. | 


(Plate I.* & Text-figure 1.) 


INDEX. 

Systematic : Page 
Lerneocera: List of described Species with synonyms ...... 820 
Derneocera: Key to Species of ............ cc ccceeeceeeeeeeeeeeeee 824 
DLerneocera diceracephala, Sp. Ve... 2.0... .cc eevee eee eee eee, 824 
IES GH NIOCG HLH Gy Oo Ty ooo occacacn Sooscneeocayseadoncdoanadeeascengens  eY40) 
JE UAT HOH Ds SDo Me cooatioanse6soracnoncsere nan qonccdnesacsesoscasen | tsYAU/ 


1. Introduction. 


In addition to the parasitic Copepods belonging to the order 

Branchiura, the collections made during the Third Tanganyika 
Expedition contain a very few specimens of parasitic Hucopepoda 
belonging to the family Lerneide ?. While there are many 
parasitic forms of Eucopepoda, comparatively few of them have 
been found on freshwater hosts, and these, perhaps, have 
received less attention than the forms infesting marine fishes. 
In the family Lerneide, the genus Lernewocerat is the only 
one which is known to occur in fresh water, and it is to this 
well-known genus that our specimens have been referred. 

Through the kindness of Dr. Calman I have been allowed 
to examine a good many examples of Lerneocera from the Nile, 
which belong to the British Museum §, Since these specimens 
have not been examined or described, and since they add con- 
siderably to the scanty material which we possess from the 
African continent, an account of them is included in the present 
paper. So far as I am aware, the existence of the genus in 
Africa has never been put on record before, the species hitherto 
known being either European or American. The following is 


* For explanation of the Plate, see p. 829. 

+ Certain parasitic Eucopepoda belonging to the family Ergasilide were obtained 
by the Expedition, in addition to the forms described in this paper. They were 
taken in the last free stage, in tow-nettings associated with non-parasitic Copepods, 
and in consequence were dealt with by Prof. G. O. Sars in his paper on the Copepoda 
of the Third Tanganyika Expedition (Proc. Zool. Soc. 1909, p. 63). 

t+ The generic name is written throughout in the form in which it is almost 
universally quoted, and no¢ as it was originally spelled by Blainville, viz. Lerneocera. 
The word is derived from the Linnzan genus Lernea. 

§ By the courtesy of the authorities of the Berlin Museum, specimens of 
L. cyprinacea and LL. esocina (the latter, one of the original examples studied by 
von Nordmann) were lent to the British Museum for the purpose of comparison 
with the forms described here. I am particularly indebted to Dr. EK. Vanhoften for 
the trouble he has taken in the matter. 


820 DR. W. A. CUNNINGTON ON PARASITIC 


a list of the African forms described for the first time in this 
paper :— 
LAKE TANGANYIKA. 
Lerneocera diceracephala. 
Lerneocera haplocephala. 


River NILe. 
Lerneocera haplocephala. 
Lerneocera temnocephala. 


For the purpose of illustration, I have made use of photo- 
micrographs taken from the actual specimens themselves. They 
are by no means easy objects to photograph, but in spite of 
imperfections, the figures will make clear the various external 
characters which have been used for the systematic descriptions. 
I have to thank Prof. Dendy, of King’s College, London, for - 
permission to do this photographic work in his laboratory.—The 
plan has been adopted of giving in each case a view of the head 
and cephalic arms from above. This was done by von Nordmann, 
one of the earliest writers on the genus, but his example has 
not been widely copied. It needs some trouble to support the 
specimens in the position necessary to secure such a view, but 
the figures obtained illustrate the nature of the head region 
far better than any others could do. 


2. Systematic Notes and Description of New Species. 


The literature which deals with the different species of the 
genus Lerncocera is somewhat scattered and not always easy to 
obtain. Although a list of the known species with synonyms is 
given by Bassett-Smith*, it is marked by material inaccuracies, 
so that it would seem worth while at this point to include a list 
which may be useful to future investigators as a starting point 
for their researches. No attempt has been made to give an 
exhaustive list of the authors by whom the species have been 
cited, as this would take up a good deal of space and serve no 
useful purpose. Only those works are referred to which have a 
bearing on the synonymy or which contain a record of original 
observations. 


List of described Species with Synonyms. 


|. LerN&OcERA CYPRINACEA T (Linneus) f. 


‘‘Lernea tentaculis quatuor: duobus apice lunulatis.” 
Linneus, Fauna Suecica, Ed, I. 1746, p. 367, tab. 11. 


Lernea cyprinacea Linneus, Systema Nature, Ed. X. 1758, 
p- 695. 


* Proc. Zool. Soc. 1899, p. 480. 

+ So far as I can ascertain, no one has ever fixed the type species or genotype of 
Lerneocera. Assuming this to be the case, in order to maintain the usage of all 
modern writers, I hereby select cyprinacea as genotype of Lerneocera. 

~ Parentheses enclosmg the Author-citation after specific names are used in 
accordance with Art. 23 of the International Rules of Nomenclature. 


EUCOPEPODA FROM TANGANYIKA, 821 


Lernéocera cyprinacea Blainville, Journal de Physique, t. 95, 
1822, p. 377. 

Lernwocera cyprinacea Burmeister, Nova Acta Acad. Ces.- 
Leop. Bd. 17, 1835, p. 309. 


2. LernmocerA EsocINA * Burmeister. 
Lerneeocera cyprinacea v. Nordmann, Mikrograph. Beitr. 
Naturgesch. wirbellosen Thiere, Heft 2, Berlin, 1832, p. 123 


(non L. cyprinacea Linn.). 
Lernceocera esocina Burmeister, Nova Acta Acad. Czs.-Leop. 


Bd. 17, 1835, pp. 309 & 312. 

Lerncocera gasterostet Brihl, Mitt. K. K. zool. Inst. d. Uniy. 
Pest, 1860 (Wien), p. 1. 

Lerneocera gobina Claus, Wirzb. naturw. Zeitschr. Bd. i. 


IstOlle jos Mule 


Lerneocera esocina Claus, Beobachtungen wher Lerneocera, 
Peniculus und Lernea. Marburg, 1868, p. 1. 


3. LERNHOCERA CRUCIATA Lesueur. 
Lerneocera cruciata (? Lernecenicus) Lesneur, Journ. Acad. Nat. 
Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 11. 1824, p, 286. 
4, LERNZOCERA PHOXINACEA Kroyer. 
Lerneocera phoxinacea Kollar MS., Kroyer, Naturhistorisk 
Tidsskrift, ser. 3, vol. 11., Copenhagen, 1863-64, p. 399. 
5. LERNHOCERA LAGENULA Heller. 
Lerneocera lagenula Heller, Reise der Novara 
(Wien, 1865), p. 246. 
6. LERNHOCERA POMOTIDIS Krgyer. 
Lerncocera pomotidis Kroyer, Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift, ser. 3, 
vol. 11., Copenhagen, 1863-64, p. 397. 


Crustaceen 


“I 


LERNXOCERA CATOSTOMI Krgyer. 


Lerneocera catostomi Kroyer, Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift, ser. 5, 
vol. i1., Copenhagen, 1863-64, p. 395. 


1t is perhaps well to point out here that the classification of the 
parasitic Eucopepoda has hardly received the attention devoted 
to that of free-living forms. At the same time it is clear that 
a satisfactory basis on which to classify the former is unusually 
dificult to find, on aecount of the extraordinary degree of 
modification commonly undergone by the female on the adoption 
of a parasitic mode of life. It is possible, indeed probable, that 


* It has been suggested by some modern writers (cf. Bassett-Smith, op. cit. p. 480, 
and Brian, ‘Copepodi Parassiti dei Pesci d'Italia,’ Genova, 1906, p. 79) that the species 
esocina and cyprinacea should be united. ‘Their contention does not seem to rest 
on personal observations, but on their interpretation of the original descriptions. 
After an examination of the actual specimens, [ have no hesitation im confirming the 
view of the older authors, namely that the species are perfectly distinct. 


822 DR, W. A. CUNNINGTON ON PARASITIC 


individual variations of form will be more than usually common 
as concerns the greatly distended bodies or the cephalic processes 
for attachment to the host, as the exact shape would seem 
without significance for the life of the parasite. Yet it is 
precisely such details which are employed for the purposes of 
classification. Thus within the limits of the genus Lerneocera 
itself it is difficult to be sure how far the specific characters 
employed will prove constant and therefore trustworthy, for 
even among the specimens that I have examined a considerable 
lack of uniformity has been observed, 


Genus LernocerA Blainville. 


It does not seem desirable to re-define the genus here, 
although the species now included in it would not strictly come 
under Blainville’s original generic description. Indeed, his 
account is based upon certain misconceptions, notably the view— 
shared by contemporary writers—of the absence of appendages 
on the body, for he says ‘‘ Aucune trace d’appendices au corps.” 
Nevertheless a number of species have been placed in this 
imperfectly defined genus, but if is open to question whether 
they should all remain there. A careful study of these forms has 
given me the impression that two or three of them may merit 
separation as distinct genera, or at least sub-genera; but without 
opportunities for a more comprehensive examination, it is im- 
possible to express a very definite opinion, and the course least 
open to objection is to leave matters as they are. 

Before proceeding to give descriptions of the new species, there 
remain one or two matters which need some explanation. It is 
characteristic of most of the species, including those which are 
described in this paper, that they exhibit the peculiar boot-like 
shape of the terminal portion of the body which was first referred 
to by von Nordmann* in his account of Z. esocina. This is 
produced, in the first place, by a protuberance immediately in 
front of the genital apertures, which forms the “ heel,” and which 
we may call the pre-genital prominence. In the second place, 
there is generally a dorsal curvature of the hindmost portion of 
the body (posterior to the genital apertures and corresponding to 
the abdomen according to Claus), which, owing to the lateral 
torsion undergone by the hinder part of the body, comes to lie 
on one side or other of the mid-line and represents the “‘ toe.” 

This explanation of the appearance we owe to Claus‘, but the 
matter is made yet clearer by the conceptions on torsion in the 
Lerneide quite recently put forward by Quidort. The latter 
assumes that the torsion is the direct result of the mode of 
fixation of the parasite and the mechanical reaction of the 
external medium. Admitting the probability of this statement, 
and admitting that the orientation of a parasite to its host is 


* Op. cit. p. 124. 
7+ Vide “ Beobachtungen tiber Lerneocera,” etc., p. 2. 
= Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris, Tome 154, 1912, p. 87. 


EUCOPEPODA FROM TANGANYIKA. 823 


probably constant for a given species, we are furnished with an 
explanation of the otherwise perplexing fact that this lateral 
torsion may be either to right or left. It will be the one or the 
other according to the particular side of the host which formed 
the point of attachment for the parasite. Quidor, moreover, 
gives evidence for believing that the amount of torsion is constant 
for a given species, and can be used as a character of systematic 
value. 

The appendages appear to show comparatively minor differences 
within the limits of this genus, and have not been appealed to 
for the purpose of establishing new species. Thus I have not 
deemed it necessary to study in detail the head appendages of 
my new forms, since these are by no means easy to investigate, 
and my material, with one exception, was very seanty. So far 
as I have been able to make out, there are no points of striking 
_ difference in any of the types from the arrangement which is 
usual in the group. Accordingly in the specific descriptions 
which follow, no special mention of head appendages, Swimming- 
feet or furcal appendages is made, it being implied that these 
are present in the normal manner, without baving any bearing 
on the distinctions between the species. 

Tn addition to the photographs reproduced in the plate, the 
accompanying text-figure is given, showing in outline for the 
three new species the appearance of the head and cephalic arms 
from above. 


Text-figure |. 


Diagram showing cephalic arms, as viewed from above. 


A. Lern@ocera diceracephala. LB. L. haplocephala. C. L. temnocephala. 


In order to facilitate identification, and in order to emphasise 
in very concrete form the chief features which characterise the 
new species, a key to all the known species of Lerneocera has 
been prepared. This did not prove a very casy task, as unfortu- 
nately it has been possible for me to examine specimens of only 
two of the forms which have been described. For particulars 
of the remaining species I have been dependent entirely upon the 
descriptions and figures of the authors concerned, and in such 
cases no more can be done than to repeat certain statements 
which would seem of value for key-making. Thus I am not 
vesponsible for the rather remarkable assertion that LZ. catostomi 
possesses three cephalic arms, which, of course, renders the head 
quite asymmetrical. That is a feature which enables us to 


824 DR. W. A. GUNNINGTON ON PARASITIC 


contrast the form sharply with the typieal species of Lerncocera, 
and which might serve as a claim to more than specific dis- 
tinction. 

It might be well to indicate here, briefly, the other forms 
which in my judgment differ materially from the more normal 
members of the genus. ‘The species L. lagenula, as described 
and figured by Heller, retains in a great measure the primitive 
segmentation of the body which is usually lost, and at the 
same time fails to show the pre-genital prominence and charac- 
teristic boot-like shape of the posterior end. It has also under- 
gone a very slight amount of torsion. The North American 
form L. pomotidis shows, according to the figure, a complete 
absence of any torsion, though otherwise it might rank as_a 
typical Lerneocera. Finally, it must be admitted that the form 
to be described below as L. diceracephala exhibits certain features 
which are non-characteristic, and one feature which is not 
shared by any other species of the genus. This peculiarity, to 
which reference is made in the specific name, is the existence 
of only two cephalic horns—apparently the dorsal pair—ainstead 
of four. Beyond this, the lobed nature of the body, suggestive of 
segmentation, and the apparent absence of any torsion, are 
further points of distinction. 


Key to the Species of LERNZOCERA. 


a. Single pair of cephalic arms present ...........0..0000ce:csseeeeesee. iceracephala. 
a’. Cephalic arms markedly asymmetrical, three in number ...... catostomi. 
a’. Two pairs of cephalic arms present. 
b. Cephalic arms simple without any indication of forking. 
c. Ventro-lateral tubercles present behind junction of 
ALIS PATIO MO CaVuaR GAS eee eee ante aew select sina dectressee mentees 
ce’. No ventro-lateral tubercles present. 
d. Cephalic arms very long and straight; body 
terminating in three broadly-rounded tubercles. pomotidis. 
d’. Cephalic arms of moderate length, curved for- 
wards; body terminating in five rounded 


haplocephala. 


_ tabercles oie eee eects eetieeterreees Oructata. 
b’. Cephalic arms forked. 
c. Pre-genital prominence absent ...............cccee eee Lagenula. 


c’. Pre-genital prominence present. 
d. Dorsal cephalic arms simple; ventral arms with 
ROCESS MRR ee erence eset Pr ula eatamntat das sa sinhc om 
d’. Dorsal cephalic arms forked ; ventral arms simple. 
e. Ventral cephalic arms nearly as stout as 
dorsal arms; egg-sacs oval, +4 length of 
HOKaGl\//sapasees obs terfonn oat ek masmcebe cba cemebance Camhee 
e’. Ventral cephalic arms much more slender 
than dorsal arms. 

Ff. Dorsal cephalic arms T-shaped ; egg- 
sacs cylindrical, 3-4 length of body ... eyprinacea. 

J’. Dorsal cephalic arms Y-shaped......... temnocephala. 


phoxinacea. 


esocina. 


1. LERN#ZOCERA DICERACEPHALA, sp.n. (PI. I. figs. 1-3.) 


Description.—(Adult female.) Cephalic arms only two in 
number, of considerable length and projecting laterally from the 
region of the head-tubercle at about right angles to the body. 


EUCOPEPODA FROM TANGANYIKA. 825 


The arms are dilated distally and bear, at about one-third their 
length from the end, a stout postero-dorsal process which 1s 
bluntly pointed. The body is bent dorsally through a consider- 
able angle at a little less than one-half its length from the head. 
It is not uniform in diameter, but shows a marked constriction at 
about the middle and an otherwise irregular contour which may 
indicate disappearing segmentation. Pre-genital prominence not 
very conspicuous, simple or slightly bilobed ; terminal portion of 
body not upturned and rotated very little, if at all. ‘The egg-sacs 
are long and tapering, about two-fifths length of body. They 
contain from four to five rows of eggs at their widest part. The 
eggs are slightly oval, "14:12 mm. 

Total length of complete specimen (excluding egg-sacs), 
8:4 mm.* 

Length of longer egg-sac, 3°5 mm. 

Remarks.—The two specimens on which this new species 1s 
founded are, unhappily, neither of them quite perfect. One of 
them, in fact, only consists of the main part of the body, without 
head, cephalic arms, or egg-sacs. This very Incomplete individual 
affords, however, valuable evidence in certain respects, for the 
sharp bend in the body and the noticeable constriction referred 
to above, are equally recognisable here, so that we may assume 
them to be definite features of the species. The specimen on 
which the description mainly rests has lost a portion of one 
cephalic arm, but we may fairly suppose it to have been the same 
as the one which is whole. In text-fig. 1, the missing part has 
been restored for the sake of affording a comparison with the 
other species. It is open to question how far the lobed nature of 
the body, which is so conspicuous, 1s indicative of segmentation. 
The fact that the most typical members of the genus show the 
body dilated into an almost formless sac, might suggest that we 
are dealing in the present case with a less modified condition. On 
the other hand, the position of the four pairs of swimming-feet, 
which appear to have no definite relation to the body lobes, is an 
argument against such a belief. 

The reference in the foregoing description to the terminal 
portion of the body, sufficiently indicates that in this form there 
is also complete or almost complete absence of the characteristic 
torsion of the body. This fact is, of course, equally displayed by 
the position of the swimming-feet, which are visible in a ventral 
view approximately in the middleline. All this implies, further, 
that the hinder end of the body cannot exhibit the usual boot-like 
shape as a consequence of deflection and rotation, as is generally 
the case, and yet it must be granted that the appearance in this 
respect is fairly typical. There is, of course, an important 
difference, namely that the shape in question is visible only in a 
lateral view, whereas it is shown in a ventral view of the more 
normal types as a result of the body torsion. In the present 


* This is the actual measurement of the specimen without taking into consideration 
its bent state. It would measure more if straightened out. 


826 DR. W. A. CUNNINGTON ON PARASITIC 


instance, then, the effect is produced rather by an incision in the 
region of the genital apertures than by the combination of 
characters which has been already fully explained. 

The most striking characteristic of this species is the existence 
of only one pair of cephalic arms instead of two pairs. There 
seems little doubt from the relation they bear to the head-tubercle, 
that these correspond to the dorsal cephalic arms of species in 
which two pairs of arms are present. Such an important differ- 
ence from the common type might be considered sufficient to 
warrant a generic distinction for this species, but [have preferred 
to leave it for the present in the genus Lerneocera. 

Occurrence.—Sumbu, Lake Tanganyika, 13.10.04. From gill- 
arches of a large Clarias mossambicus. ‘Two specimens, one very 
incomplete. 


9. LERNHOCERA HAPLOCEPHALA, sp.n. (PI. I. figs. 4-7.) 


Description.—(Adult female.) Cephalic arms four, of about 
equal size, short and stout, without any indication of forking and 
being so placed as to form a particularly regular cross. The 
dorsal arms are simple and bluntly pointed ; the ventral differ 
from them only slightly, exhibiting an obvious swelling on their 
ventral aspects. The body is almost straight, unsegmented and 
cylindrical. The anterior third is slender, the body dilating 
gradually behind to become about twice as thick. Pre-genital 
prominence well marked, simple and not bilobed ; terminal 
portion of body rather slightly upturned and rotated through 
somewhat less than 90°. Immediately behind the junction of the 
arms with the body, and just external to the second pair of 
swimming-feet, a pair of rounded tubercles are situated, which 
project ventro-laterally. The egg-sacs are moderately long and 
tapering, about one-fifth length of body. They contain from four 
to five rows of eggs at their widest part. The eggs are approxi- 
mately round, and their diameter is about *] mm. 

Total length of largest specimen (excluding egg-sacs), 14°3 mm. 

Remarks.—This species is represented in my material by a 
considerable number of specimens from different sources, which 
would suggest that it isa relatively common form. Unfortunately, 
the bulk of the specimens have suffered severely from lack of care 
in preservation, having been preserved apparently in the same 
manner as their host, or even with it, and they are in consequence 
greatly shrunken and shrivelled. Jt is thus the more satisfactory 
that all these can be readily identified as belonging to this species 
by the presence of the characteristic ventro-lateral tubercle 
mentioned above. The single specimen from Tanganyika, on 
which the description is largely based, and which is figured on 
Plate I., is unluckily devoid of egg-sacs, but this defect is made 
good in one from the Nile (fig. 7), which happens to be damaged 
elsewhere. The Tanganyika specimen proves also considerably 
loager than any of the individuals from the Nile, which is doubt- 
less accounted for in part by the contracted nature of the latter. 


EUCOPEPODA FROM TANGANYIKA. 827 


In two tubes, each containing a number of Nile specimens, the 
lengths vary from 6°2—9:0 mm. and from 8°8-11:7 mm. 

A careful examination showed the lateral torsion of the body 
to vary in direction, as was expected. Unfortunately, minute 
details as to the position of the parasites on the host are missing 
for the Nile material, so that it is impossible to test the accuracy 
of Quidor’s assumptions in relation to this species. The in- 
dividual from Tanganyika was, however, taken from the soft 
region at the junction of the pelvic fins,—a spot more nearly 
ventral than lateral. At the same time, it is hardly probable that 
the point of attachment was so strictly median as to preclude the 
possibility of lateral torsion in conformity with this view. 

Fig. 7 serves also to show how strikingly these parasitic forms 
may in turn be covered by other organisms. In this case, the 
latter are Vorticellids, which infest many of these Lerneids from 
the Nile to such a degree as to render difficult the study of their 
anatomy. Among a considerable number of specimens taken 
on a Polypterus senegalus, almost all are infested, some of 
them as markedly as the one photographed. The region where 
the Vorticellids are most thickly attached is about the junction 
of the thin anterior third of the body with the more dilated 
posterior portion. It seems highly probable that the manner in 
which these parasitic Copepods can be so densely encrusted by 
such organisms (other cases are referred to in the literature of 
the subject), is directly related to the peculiar fact that after 
fixation to their host they appear no longer to undergo ecdysis*. 

Occurrence.—Kituta, Lake Tanganyika, 24.8.04. From the 
soft region at the junction of the pelvic fins of a large Polypterus 
congicus. One specimen. 

White Nile. From the fleshy region at the junction of the 
pair of pectoral fins of a Polypterus senegalus. Highteen speci- 
mens, some of them incomplete, belonging to the collection of the 
British Museum. 

Fashoda, White Nile. Eight further specimens (one incomplete) 
from the British Museum collection. The only particulars stated 
are :—‘“ From Polypterus birchir, Fashoda.” 

Tt is interesting to note that this species of Zerneocera has 
been taken only on the Ganoid Polypterus, albeit on different 
species of that genus. , 


3. LERNHOCERA TEMNOCEPHALA, sp.n. (PI. I. figs. 8 & 9.) 


Description.—(Adult female.) Cephalic arms four, of unequal 
size. The dorsal arms are long and stout, and fork distally in 
a Y-shaped manner, terminating in rounded lobes. The ventral 
arms are quite short, slender and simple, being bluntly pointed 
at their ends. The body is almost straight, unsegmented and 
cylindrical. The anterior third or less is moderately slender, 
the body dilating gradually behind. Pre genital prominence 


* Of. Jungersen, Mindeskrift for J. Steenstrup, xvi, Copenhagen, 1914, p. 6. 
Proc, Zoou. Soc,—1914, No. LVI. 56 


828 DR. W. A. CUNNINGTON ON PARASITIC 


well marked, simple or slightly bilobed ; terminal portion of body 
not upturned. 

Total length of specimen, 10-0 mm. 

From tip to tip of dorsal cephalic arms, 4-2 mm. 

Remarks.—It is unfortunate that this species has to be 
described from a single specimen. Although no egg-sacs are 
present, it isalmost certainly adult, and there seems no reasonable 
doubt that it represents a distinct form. This unique individual 
has unluckily been badly preserved, and as a result the body 
is nearly flattened towards its posterior end. It thus becomes 
impossible to determine the real diameter of this part of the 
body, and so to express the amount of dilatation which it has 
undergone. Similarly, an artificial twist in the body makes it 
virtually impossible to state the nature and degree of torsion, 
From the shape of the cephalic arms, this form may be placed 
not far from the oldest known European species, L. eyprinacea 
and Z. esocina, from which it is nevertheless perfectly distin- 
guishable. ‘The dorsal cephalic arms in this specimen, as will be 
seen from fig. 9, are not quite bilaterally symmetrical, a condition 
of things which is met with in the genus from time to time. 

Occurrence.—The specimen belongs to the collection of the 
British Museum. Particulars are given as follows :—‘ From 
Barbus bynni, bought in Old Cairo fish bazaar—caught in the 
Nile, Loat Coll., no. 26.” 


3. General Remarks. 

It is clear that, whatever may be the case for marine fishes, 
the fishes of fresh water are relatively seldom the prey of parasitic 
Eucopepoda under natural conditions. This is indicated by the 
paucity of material in the collections under review, for the 
specimens on which this paper is based come from eight indi- 
viduals only. On the Third Tanganyika Expedition, of which 
I can speak personally, very large numbers of fish were examined, 
on only two of which were such parasites discovered. It is 
instructive to compare with this the occasions on which Argu- 
lidee—also external parasites—were obtained. They were taken 
18 times in Lake Tanganyika, and in some cases on two or three 
individuals of the same species at the same time, while with 
lesser opportunities, they were found on three separate fish in 
the Victoria Nyanza, as against no record at all of parasitic 
Euecopepods. A study of the literature of the subject confirms 
our conclusion. ‘There are, it is true, other families besides the 
Lerneeide which are represented in fresh water, but they do not 
constitute a very formidable assemblage, while the genus Lerne- 
ocera, sole representative of its family, contains but a small 
number of species. Of these species it is certainly true to say 
that they are not very common, and in the majority of cases the 
remark is equally true of the other parasitic forms. When 
natural limits are transgressed, as they usually are in the stocking 
of ponds and rivers with fish, there not infrequently occur 


EUCOPEPODA FROM TANGANYIKA, 829 


Serious epidemics due to vast numbers of parasites which have 
multiplied under conditions abnormally favourable to them. 

It is worth while to mention that a few other specimens 
belonging to the British Museum have passed through my hands 
without receiving any notice in the general text. This is because 
they were too much damaged to permit of identification or 
description, but they can be referred to the genus Lerneocera 
almost with certainty, and as such are worthy of putting on 
record. They were all taken on Nile fish, and came from three 
separate individuals. One Specimen was taken on a Clarias 
lazera, two more on another Clarias (2 lazera), while two-further 
Specimens are labelled as follows :—“F rom Barbus bynani— 
Damietta Nile, near Samannud. Loat Coll., no. 691.” 

As regards the distribution of these African Species of Lerneidee, 
it is to be noted that while one species has been found only 
in Tanganyika and another only in the Nile, the third form 
occurs in both. There is, then, no indication of that peculiar 
nature and superior richness of fauna which in SO many cases 
characterises the lake. At the same time, we know as yet so 
extremely little of the distribution of these forms in Africa, that 
it would be out of place to lay much stress on the facts which have 
so far coine to light. It is, indeed, a fact that the Tanganyikan 
species, Lerneocera diceracephala, is so fav peculiar that it ma y be 
found necessary to establish a new genus for its reception, while 
the two Nile species are much more typical members of the genus 
Lerneocera. Further, if we deal with the parasitic Kucopepoda 
as a whole, including the Ergasilidee, we still find that the fauna 
of Tanganyika is exceptional and unusually rich in diverse forms. 
Prof. Sars described * a new genus—FHrgasiloides—with three 
endemic species from Lake Tanganyika, and from Lake N yasa, 
only a single species of FErgasilus not further determined, but 
which is probably the same as that recorded by Mrazek from the 
Victoria Nyanza. 


EXPLANATION OF THE PLATE. 
(All figures by about 5.) 


Lerneocera diceracephala. 
Fig. 1. Ventral view. 
2. Lateral view. 
3. View of cephalic arms from above. 


Lerneocera haplocephata. 
Pig. 4. Ventral view. 
5. Lateral view. 
6. View of cephalic arms from above. 
7. Lateral view of specimen infested with \ orticellids. 


Lerneocera temnocephata. 
Fig. 8. Ventral view. 
9. View of cephalic arms from above. 


* P.Z.S. 1909, p. 63. 
oO* 


dw: ‘sealat  a me ove velit 
A A ee er hap Ee TE =u Meet? ee Thewenseheaiid ir 
; oe ee Sue wile om i” i jin ne ui é * geet ae aH 3 oh 
‘es Pe CO Ee sb | detest) oer Seishin a eee se 
ai PEON By eat eit te0s pega! Sul 7 es cay (ae gir inaes 
on: aa Hag INE: Peanae arene Ol Lethe oo oe ela 
sretanasetek ro at Wien’ oP 8 ee at orig Sea ae 
ry giaring y ares eat b Gre 


Sarai pare: Aho nevrig. 
Syrebie Gh et PS aati ee te hi al {fs wee ae ai 
ven Ree oF ae ead tii ane a pl PE ahi end fw 
thieves hard a OT ae ae a 

Sida wine: ule ee 
ale Rei a! OP Ande He on wan, OE 

. rhe. Siem: sich j SLedttercidboatir 

i Ki a eal ia HOE 


i jeter ee | wthiy ‘a, 
a Pas ; a sill j auf in? iat f 
ag alee wes Pi , > oie i Oe RTS hone 


: ee | oo, denn elvan nasal aie 
hielo ee biel 


P ‘ ' 
; - tovin iest) marae daa Fey ary wi 
; , a ' ag’ oh peop Aled See eed. aif 
eS a c pare ; y : ijiea ee 
; Ak Ce ee a on doe a ae 
we af ny {i wal: TES ee rae, 


baja Oa Na aleoit ie hips 


tag in mee AE ete Ang ae 1 eT eh adc ae or 
bh hy ad iil aie sa ts) Mc Yiadgrg” PA ed Prete agctr sei S 

' a Flee seme os it lew one t 4114 
ate hire 3 iim ieee ot ated 
ide ech hy tia Fredy ant Ae ianesk Sa 


eek Cre 


tive 


“4 f 1h0G RRA ee 


ar teh 
eR? It See 
E 4 Par : | ee 
‘a eaeinieniete” fe faethe 
Me af Pe ; ; “t e F, hyo hay jee y a4 shee Capt A Lee re - 


‘ Suhel 


hi bea fest ay caplet yneeay 


Cambridge Gay , 


del. 


A.W.Waters 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR. 


ln “2 we he & 


PZ Ss ioe 


AW.Waters, del. 


4 
5 
g 
S 
<{ 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR. — 


ON BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR. 831 


46. The Marine Fauna of British East Africa and Zanzibar, 
. from Collections made by Cyril Crossland, M.A., 
B.Se., F.Z.S., in the Years 1901-1902. Bryozoa— 
Cyclostomata, Ctenostomata, and Endoprocta. By 


ARTHUR Wm. Waters, F.L.S., F.G.S.* 
[Received May 19, 1914: Read June 9, 1914. | 


(Plates L-IV.7 & Text-figure 1.) 


INDEX. 

Page 
Geographical sDistnibuttommys ery ceeeneeessaet cesar snes ce Soe 

Systematic: 
Gristaenflacaaspelenreeenecee ee are Oe at Ee OOD 
(OFROSOG): COREUMGAITy SDo Ts eosocasdadsbooosoucdsune cbobae esr Gon gbbor oodoaun ats AO) 
Entalophora wasinensis, WOM. NOV. 22... ... eee eee eee eee esses. 840 
Mimosella bigeminata, sp. 0. ...... 6.0 eee eee cece = 851 
Zoobotryon pellucidum, rosette-plates ............ 6. eeeeeee eee eeeeee 849 


The present paper continues the series on the collections made 
by Mr. Crossland in the tropics. The first was on Vubucellaria, 
published in the Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. xxx. 1907; 
then two parts in the ‘ Reports of the Sudanese Red Sea,’ 
ibid. vol. xxx1. 1909, and vol. xxxi. 1910; and the Cheilostomata 
from British Hast Africa and Zanzibar in the ‘ Proceedings’ of 
the Zoological Society, 1913. 

The bibliographical references are pretty full in order that, so 
far as the tropics are concerned, they may be used as a con- 
tinuation of Miss Jelly’s Catalogue. 

It should not be forgotten that all the specimens dealt with in 
this paper are from but a very slight depth (up to 10 faths.), so 
that but few Cyclostomata would be expected, since they mostly 
occur at considerable depths. 


Points of Special Interest. 


The ovicells of Hntalophora, and of Jdmonea radians Lam., 
have been studied full of embryos, and the occiostome has been 
cut through. In Jdmonea radians the ovicells form lobes between 
each series of zowcia. The ovicells must be more used in classi- 
fication, and the primary zoccia and the early stages must be 
examined. 

The rosette-plates of Reichert in Zoobotryon, instead of having 
a number of pores round a central pore, as described, have a 
central pore and 8-9 cells round the pore. The mass of cells 
in the neighbourhood of the pore are dealt with. 

27 species or varieties are mentioned in this communication, 


* Communicated by Cyrin Crossnanp, M.A,, B.Sc., F.Z.8. 
+ For explanation of the Plates see p. 807. 


852 | 


854. 


8352 MR. A. W. WATERS ON 


and 76 were described in the previous one, making 103 in all; 
of these 37 are known from the Atlantic, 22 are British, 31 
Mediterranean, 37 are known from the Indian Ocean, 14 from 
S. Africa, and 51 from Australia. 


Table of Distribution. 


== eed 


Mediter- 
yanean. 


Australia. 


British. 
Red Sea. 


Crisia denticulata (amk.) ..) + 
.» elongata M.-Kd. | | 

»  sertularoides (Aud. & | | | | 
NSPnv)} spews eee zl peut ate | | 

» inflata, sp. u. aa 


| 
co COU REDITIEAT@I SYS Tilo soqnnooce | 


+ 
+ 
+ 


++ | S. Africa. 
ab 


| Entalophora wasinensis, | 


3. Tervia irregularis (Meneg.) .... + 2.5 


. Idmonea milneana VOrb. ... + + + 2 7 


7 | Amathia lendigera (li.) .........) + ) + | + 3 Sel ib. 


' Mimosella bigeminata, sp. n....' 


853 | 


|| Buskia nitens Alder 


| 
KOS DNS | asecdeoueqcer + 
Filisparsa tuhulosa (Busk) ... +B 


oh 
+ 


Pacific. 
se radians (Lamk.) ...... 
© interjuncta MacG. ... 


+++ 4+ 44+ 
+ + ++ 


: ices cae ee “Rs + 
,  Wistans Busk : io Meta 


PS vidovici (eallayy bate te SRO ef Roscoff. 
Zoobotryon pellucidum Ehy. .. | Isle of Pines, 


Bowerbankia pustulosa(H.&S.) +. | 


++ 
= 
oa 
+ 


WG DORTANGA RIS ememoncenocsocabaauee 

Farrella atlantica Busk ...... + 

Valkeria uva (li)... i ae 
+ 


+ } 
Sn can ete Pe ... | China Seas. 
Cylindreecium giganteum By + 


+ + ..  ... | Queen Charlotte I. 
Arctic, Q. Charlotte I. 


- California. 


+++: 


' Pedicellina spinosa (Rob.) hee 
Barentsia gracilis (Sars) ..... {hat 
Loxosoma singulare Kef. 


Lepralia poissonii Aud. ...... Neto  laneesct tt eens Recetas 


Japan. 
Beania intermedia Hincks......) ... | ... | .. sone (ie 


++ 


Levinsen * quotes Norman with regard to zoarial and zocecial 
characters, who says: “ Why also in all instances is the ultimate 
growth and form of the zoarium to he excluded from generic 
characters among certain families of the Cheilostomata, and at 
the same time to be recognised among the Cyclostomata and 
Jtenostomata, and even some other groups of Cheilostomata ?” 

Few characters have been available in the Cyclostomata, and 
those mostly zoarial ones, so that the classification of the group 1s 
still in a somewhat hopeless condition, whereas in the Cheilosto- 
ae very many characters are now used, and the classification is 

gradually becoming more natwal. It is therefore to the more 


* Morph. and Syst. Studies on the Cheil. Bryozoa, p. 69 (19C9). 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR. 8353 


highly differentiated Cheilostomata that we must at present look 
for guidance, rather than to the simpler Cyclostomata. 

There are, however, some characters in the Cyclostomata, 
which when more used will help to show which forms are nearly 
velated. Smitt showed that the ovicells furnished important 
characters, and on several occasions I have pointed out the 
importance of the ovicells, and of what I called the peristome of 
the ovicellular opening, saying in 1888* that ‘“ the position and 
nature of the opening is most important, eften more so than the 
shape of the ovicell.” © Harmer has confirmed what I said, and in 
several very valuable papers has gone into detail in some genera, 
and has named the passage by which the larva escapes the 
occiostome, while the external orifice is the oceciopore, which 
terms are generally accepted, though unless new terms are 
absolutely necessary they are always to be regretted, as every 
branch of science 1s now overloaded with names. Also the size of 
the embryo, and of the zocecial aperture, as well as the position 
and nature of the closures, give specific or generic characters. 

The primary zoecium and the growth of the younger part of 
the zoarium must receive much more attention, in fact up to the 
present in recent forms it has received hardly any: for example, 
in Hntalophora proboscidea, E. deflera Couch, and Filisparsa tubu- 
losa there is a Stomatopora-like growth often spreading for a 
considerable distance over the supporting material, before the 
zoarium becomes erect, whereas in what has been considered to 
be Entalophora rugosa VOrb., from Naples, there is a Diastopora- 
growth often covering a considerable piece of the stone or shell 
upon which it grows before the erect cylindrical zoarium is 
formed. It is elsewhere shown that other characters, namely 
the lamina and ovicells, prove that it belongs to the Diastoporide. 

To return to the more highly differentiated Cheilostomata : in 
various genera the zoarium may be either adnate, erect, uni- or 
bilaminate, or even articulated. For example, Lepralia, Schizo- 
porella, Celleporidee, all occur adnate, erect, uni- and bilaminate, 
while Zhalamoporella may be unilaminate, bilaminate, adnate or 
erect and articulated ; Cellaride in recent forms are usually 
articulate, except in the younger branches, but in fossils fre- 
quently there is no articulation. Now in none of these cases is 
there any material difference in the zoecium according to the 
way in which the zoarium grows. 

It is sometimes forgotten that all this only deals with the 
position of the zoeecia, or, as Levinsen would say, the “‘autozooids,” 
and this has proved of quite secondary value in classification ; but 
this does not mean that characters furnished by the other 
‘‘zooids” such as avicularia, stalks, stolons, radicles ete., which 
also cause differences in the form of the zoarium, may not furnish 
valuable characters. 

No doubt the Catenicellide are derived from unarticulated 


* “On some Ovicells of Cyclostomatous Bryozoa,’ Jour. Linn, Soc., Zool. 
vol. xx. p. 276. 


834 MR. A. W. WATERS ON 


forms, but evidently this is a long way back, so that now 
articulation is apparently a generic character; but there must 
have been a time when closely related forms were in some cases 
continuous, in others articulated, but now both zoarial and 
zocecial characters indicate a group of Catenicellide. In Cellaridz 
and Thalamoporella the articulation is more recent, and should 
not be made a generic character. 

Examining the Cyclostomata in the same way, we find to a 
certain extent parallels with the Cheilostomata : Diastopora, or 
perhaps we should say Diastoporide, occurs adnate, but also 
bilaminate in such forms as D. intricaria, Mesenteripora; and 
some forms now placed with Hntalophora, such as H. regularis 
MacG., belong to this family. Even the D. obelia division, which 
it has been proposed to raise to a genus Diplopora*, has adnate 
forms, as well as the erect fossil Diastopora brendolensis Waters 7, 
with tubules between the zoecia. A Stomatopora-like growth 
may become erect, and too much importance has been attached 
to whether a form is adnate or erect. There are adnate forms 
with Heteroporidan structure, and some bilaminate as Pavospirua. 

The ovicells together with the oceciostomes ete. are, as stated, 
going to assist us to trace relationship, but to what extent we 
cannot yet say, as our knowledge is in most families very in- 
complete, often fragmentary or absent. However, although only 
sufficient to show the direction in which work is wanted, it may 
be useful to put together what I have gathered from my own 
collection and from published accounts of recent forms. 

In Crisiaz the ovicells of most species are known, and they with 
the oceciostomes furnish most useful characters in determination. 
In the species examined there are 8—9 tentacles. 

In /dmonea, as at present understood, there are some important 
and rather puzzling differences in the ovicells. There is, Firsv, 
the /. radians, mentioned in this paper, also /. atlantica Forbes, 
I. concava Reuss, and J. parasitica Busk, in which the oeeciostome 
occurs on one side, usually on the second of the series enveloped 
by the ovicell, and by the first or second zoewcium counting from 
the median line; the tube curves over and turms downwards 
(PI. IT. fig. 6, @.). In these the ovicell spreads across the anterior 
surface. 

Seconp. There may be merely an anterior inflation, usually 
near to a bifureation, with a central ocwciostome, as /. interjuncta 


MacG. 
TurrD. I have a fragment of an /dmonea, probably australis 


* This name cannot stand as it has already been used, see page 836. 

+ Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xlviti, p. 155, pl. iii, fig. 1 (1892). 

~ Reuss (Foss. Polyparien des Wiener Tert. p. 99) described the Cyclostomatous 
ovicells as Caelophyma, of which C. glabrum occurred on Crisia hérnesi (a Crisia), 
Retepora disticha (apparently Idmonea), and R. cancellata (do. Idm.); and 
Celophyma striatum on Hornera hippolithus. i 

Hagenow (Bry. Maest. p. 105) described Calophyma levis on Truncatula repens 
and T. truncata; C. constrictum on Idmonea tetrasticha (this is not Idmonea, 
perhaps a worn Truneatula); and C. granulatwn on Idm. lichenoides. Gregory 
does not quote Hagenow quite correctly. 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR. 835 


MacG., in which the ovicell spreads over three or four series on 
one side only of the median line. 

FourtH. There is the very curious ovicell standing erect and 
embracing the zocecia of a series, which I described * as occurring 
in J. meneghini Hell., but from an examination of more material 
T came to the conclusion that it was /. triforis Hell., and a 
co-type has confirmed this conclusion, As described, there was 
little to distinguish /. meneghina Hell. from J. triforis Hell. 
except size, so that without a fair amount of material they were 
not readily distinguished. 

The zoceecial aperture of Jdmonea varies from 0:06—0°2 mm. 

The so-called J. wregularis Meneghini has the ovicell dorsal, 
and must be removed to Jervia. It has 13 tentacles. 

In Tubulipora there is an anterior ovicell spreading among 
many zocecia, with the oceciostome usually close up to a zoccial 
tube. Zocecial aperture 0°07-0°18 mm. Tentacles 11-12. The 
colony is, where attached, often provided with small projections 
or even long multitubular radicles, so that the attachment is but 
slight, whereas in Stomatopora it seems to be very close. 

In Filisparsa there is an anterior ovicell. 14 tentacles. 

In Entalophora few ovicells have been seen. In the proboscidea 
group they are not very large, and are near to several zocecial 
tubes without enclosing them. In wasinensis, the species 
described in this paper, the ovicell is very long and contains 
a considerable number of embryos. However, under /ntalophora 
many species have been included which have a distinct lamina, 
and in these the ovicells found are of the Diastopora type, and 
suggest that they are erect cylindrical Diastopora. Entalophora 
regularis MacG., and what I called #. rugosa dOrb., from 
the Mediterranean, must be removed on this account from 
Entalophora. 

The zoecial aperture of Hntalophora is 0:07-0:19 mm. The 
number of tentacles is 12-16. 

Diastopora. The ovicell is vesicular, as an irregular or sub- 
globular elevation, often involving many zoecia, and sometimes 
situated tangentially to the colony. The ovicell may spread 
internally with many arms, as in D. intricaria SmitttT. So far 
as seen, the oceciostome of Diastopora is a small plain tube, usually 
directed proximally. The zoccial aperture is 0:06—0°11 mm. % 
The number of tentacles counted is 10-12. The ovicells of a very 
considerable number of fossil Diastoporw have been figured, and 
the genus was abundant in the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods, 
and oceurs as Berenicea consimilis Lonsdale, in the Silurian (see 
fig. in Bassler, ‘ Bry.-Fauna of the Rochester Shale,” p. 16, pl. v. 
figs. 1-5, 1906). 


* “QOvicells of Cyclost. Bryozoa,” Journ. Linn. Soc., Zool. vol. xx. p. 278, pl. xiv. 
fig. 2 (1888). 

+ Waters, “Bryozoa from Franz Josef Land,” Journ. Linn, Soc., Zool. vol. xxix. 
p. 178, pl. xix. fig. 12 (1901). 

t In some fossils the orifice is larger, see Canu. 


836 MR. A; W. WATERS ON 


Diastopora with tubules has been called Diplopora, a name 
already used for a calcareous alga. MacGillivray made a genus 
Diplopora, but finding the name occupied changed it to Diplo- 
porella ; the name Diplopora has also been given for two or three 
other things. The group, however, occurs incrusting and bila- 
minate. The family Diastoporide will probably be found to be 
more distinctly separated than any of the others. 

Hornera. The ovicell is a large subglobular, dorsal or some- 
what lateral chamber with large pits and a lateral oceciostome. 
‘Tentacles, 9 in species examined. The ‘* Hornera eburnea” 
Jull. & Calv. has a most curious anterior ovicell, but I do not 
see why it is placed with Hornera; also the Hornera gravieri* 
Calv. seems to have a somewhat similar ovicell. Zoccial 
aperture of Hornera 0-04—0°12 mm. 

Discotubigera (Defrancia). Tangential ovicell with oceciostome 
near the distal border. One specimen has the ovicell the whole 
way round the periphery. No doubt many species have been 
placed under Lichenopora. 

Stomatopora. Although many Stomatopore have heen figured 
and described, but very few ovicells have been seen, and Smitt 
said no species were known with ovicells. In 4. divergens 
Waters t, the ovicell is a small round elevation on the anterior 
surface. In S.(?) sp. from Plymouth the ovicell is at the end 
of an erect branch as in Supercytis. In S. major Johns., the 
anterior ovicell has a small plain tube for the oceciostome. 

The S. compacta Norm. is Diastopora, and has the ovicells 
raised in between the openings of a small number of zoacia, or 
is tangential, with the occiostome as in Diastopora. Norman's 
specimens examined are now in the British Museum, 

Lichenopora. Ovicell central and spreading between the rays. 
Oceciostome erect, plain or funnel-shaped; or a plain horizontal 
tube low down near the edge of the ovicell. There may be many 
oceciostomes, probably indicating several ovicells, just as a colony 
of Diastopora may have a number of ovicells. Smitt mentions 
eight occiostomes in L. verrucaria, and this must have been a 
fine specimen, as I have never seen more than six. The zoecial 
apertures in all recent species measured are about the same size 
(from about 0-06—0-09 mm.). 

Defrancia lucernaria Sarvs and Domopora stellata have the 
ovicells in between the rays. 

Frondipora has the ovicell across the anterior surface of a 
branch, not much raised, and the occiostome, about 0:12 mm. 
wide with the lower edge straight, also is but little raised, and is 
not attached to a group of zocecia. 

Flosculipora has the ovicell-wall uniting from neighbouring 
zocecial bundles. 


* Calvet, “ Bry. Cyclost. prov. des Camp. scient. accomp. p. S. A.S. le Prince de 
Monaco a hord de Ja Princesse-Alice,” Bull. Inst. Ocean. No. 216, p. 7, fig. 6 (1911). 

+ Krit. Fort. 1866, p. 414. 

+ Expéd. Antarct. Belge, p. 89, pl. ix. fig. 6 (1904), 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR, 837 


Heteropora., ‘The ovicell is unknown in recent species, but 
Novak * figures one In a Cretaceous fossil. It is sac-like with a 
small opening at one end. ‘Tentacles 14 in /. pelliculata Waters. 

Supercytis has the ovicell at the end of the erect colony 
spreading over the whole width. The Supercytis tubigera Busk, of 
the ‘Challenger,’ is not related to Supercytis, nor is it correctly 
described, as the series ave not uniserial but biserial. It looks 
more like a Z’ubulipora. 

Crisulipora. Oceciostome tube narrower than the zoccial tube, 
without any terminal expansion, There are 10 tentacles. 


CRISIA DENTICULATA (Lamarck), (PI. IV. fig. 5.) 

Crisia denticulata Waters, “ Rep. Mar. Biol. of the Sudanese 
Red Sea, Bry. pt. u. Cyclost. etc.,” Journ. Linn. Soc., Zool. 
vol. xxxi, p. 232, pl. xxiv. figs. 1-3, pl. xxv. fig. 11 (1910); and 
add :— 

Osburn, “ Bry. of the Woods Hole Region,” cll, Bur. 
Fisheries, vol. xxx. p. 216, pl. xviii. fig. 8 (1912); “ Bry. from 
TLenaadi. etc.,’ Proe: Un. Sti Nat: Mus. vol. xliii. p- 276 (1912); 
Guerin- Ganivet, “Bry. de la Région de Concarneau, ete.,” Trav. 
Se. du Lab. de Zool. et de Phys. Mar. de Concarnean, ‘vol. ny 
p- 19 (1912); “ Mission Arctiques: Bryozoaires,” Soc. d’Océan. du 
Golfe de Gascoigne, p. 39 (1913); Osburn, “ Bry. of the Tortugas 
Islands, Florida,” Pub, 182, Carnegie Inst. of Washington, 
p. 185 (1914). 

We see that the connections from the stolons to the zocecia, or 
through the septa of the stolon, in Zooboiryon pellucidum Khy. 
(p. 849) and other Ctenostomata are much more elaborate than 
any description had indicated, a number of cells on each side 
meeting those on the other, and to these groups of cells reach the 
plasma network, which spreads through the stolon and the zoccia. 
However, in Crisia and other Cyclostomata, I have not found a 
plasma network spreading all through the zocecium, as we know 
it in Cheilostomata and Ctenostomata, but near the base below 
the ceecum there is a small number of threads. The polypide so 
nearly fills up the zoecial tube, that there does not seem to be 
room for much network of plasma. 

In Crisia and cther Cyclostomata, the number of connecting 
pores is very considerable, being situated generally all along the 
surfaces, and, as a rule, the zoccium at its proximal end is 
connected with the zoccia on the two sides, in such a way that 
it seems impossible to speak of a new zoecium having arisen 
from any one older zocwcium (PI. 1V. fig. 6). There are “but few 
cellsin contact with the pore, in this case apparently two on each 
side (PI. IV. fig. 5). 

Loc. Add: Arctic; Atlantic, Cape Verde Islands. Wasin, Brit. 
K. Africa, 10 fath. (601, 516). 


* “Bry. der béhmischen Kreideformation,” Denks. der Math.-Naturw. Cl. K. 
Akad. Wien, vol. xxxvii. pl. yini. figs. 80, 31 (1877) 


838 MR. A. W. WATERS ON 


CrisiA ELONGATA Milne-Edwards. (Pl. I. figs. 3, 4; Pl. IV. 
fig. 6.) 

Orisia elongata Milne-Edwards, ‘“ Mém. sur les Crisies, les 
Hornéres,” Ann. des Sciences Nat. ser. 2, vol. ix. p. 10, pl. vu. 
fig. 2 (1838); ? Busk, Brit. Mus. Cat. Cyclost. p. 5, pl. iv. figs. 5, 
6 (1875); ¢Busk, Chall. Exp. Zool. vol. xvii. p. 5, pl. i. fig. 3 
(1886). 

The specimens from Wasin are without any doubt the species 
described by Milne-Edwards, even though he says * plus gréle” 
than C., denticulata Lamk., which is not the case. Busk, in his 
Museum Catalogue, speaks of the zocecia being much produced, 
whereas this is never the case in my specimens, nor does Milne- 
Edwards show it, or even Busk himself in his figures. 

The lateral branch, of which there is one, and only one, to each 
joint starts from near the end of a joint, after about the 6th-10th 
zocecia on the one side. The last zocwcial tube is continued free, 
as is the case to a certain extent with the last zocecium on the 
other side. The number of zoccia is uneven, and in some of the 
terminal nodes as many as 13 pairs of zocecia have been counted. 
There is the small mark below the oral aperture, as in C. denti- 
culata, showing its relationship. The older chitinous joints are 
black, the younger ones are light. No ovicells are known. 

The surface has numerous pores, and | do not understand Busk 
speaking of it as granular. The closure is slightly raised in the 
centre, and near this there are one or two pores. 

The zoarium is about 0°3 mm. wide; the distance from zocecium 
to zocecium, on the same side, is about 0°25 mm.,and the aperture 
of the zocecia is about 0°07 mim. 

Since I wrote my Naples paper, I have been able to examine 
better specimens of what I took to be C. elongata, which correspond 
most nearly with C. cribraria Stimpson, as re-described by 
Osburn *. 

In the Naples specimens, the fresh internode arises after the 
2nd, 3rd, or 4th zoccium of the one side, and another branch 
arises from after about the 6th zocecium on the other side; no 
ovicells were found, though some are forming at the very end of 
the branch, and the zowcia are about 0°45 mim. apart, which is 
about the same as in C. ramosa H., with which it is allied, but 
the chitinous joints are light. What I called var. angustata, 
I now consider is C. ramosa Harm. 

The Algoa Bay specimen, so described in the British Museum 
Catalogue, is probably elongata, and in this specimen the fresh 
branches are always high in the internode. The ‘ Challenger’ 
specimen named elongata I do not think is this species, and it 
has branches both high and low in the internodes, more as in 
C. ramosa. The specimens called elongata by Norman from 
Madeira are more like C. rwmosa. 

Loc. Red Sea ? (I.-Hd.); Algoa Bay? Wasin, Brit. E. Africa, 
10 fath. (501), collected by Crossland. 


* “ Bryozoa of the Woods Hole Region,” Bull. Bur. of Visheries, yol. xxx. p. 215, 
pl. xviii. fig. 7 (1910). 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR. 839 


. 


CRISIA SERTULAROIDES (Audouin & Savigny) *. (PI. I. figs. 5, 6. ) 
Proboscina sertularoides Aud., “ Descrip. de ’Kgypte,’’ Hist. 


nat. p. 236; Savigny, pl. vi. fig. 6. 

Crisia recurva Heller, “ Bry. des Adriat. Meeres,” Verh. d. K.-K. 
zool.-bot. Gesellsch. Wien, vol. xvii. p. 118, pl. vi. figs. 3, 4 (1867). 

Zoaria of rather straggling growth, apparently about 20 mm. 
high; internodes short, with 7-15 zocecia, though usually 7-9, 
with light joints, and the branches grow from above the first 
zoceclum on that side, with sometimes another branch on the 
other side, near the distal end of the node. Branches not very 
wide (about 0°15 mm.); zoccia directed forwards with only a 
short part free, the distance from zocecium to zowcium is about 
0-21 mm., the zoccial aperture is 0°06 mm. 

The ovicells are very wide and large, irregular globular, placed 
to one side, and the oceciostome is funnel-shaped. 

The growth is like that of C. eburnea L., but the branches arise 
higher up after the first or second zocecium, and in nodes where 
there is a branch the number of zoccia is uneven. It is also 
much like C. aeropora Busk, though the denticle by the aperture 
occurs but very rarely; from C. ramosa Harm., it differs in 
having shorter internodes and in having the zoecia much nearer 
together. Although Heller’s figures and description are unsatis- 
factory, it does not seem that there can be any doubt as to the 
identity of the species. 

A specimen from Ras Osowamembe (504) has the zocecia less 
spread out, the joints black in the older parts, and toe zoccia 
about 0°28 mm. apart; the ovicells are large and irregular over 
the whole width of the zoarium. ‘The difference may only be 
local, and it seems advisable to consider it a variety. 

Loe, Adriatic (Heller). Wasin, Brit. KE. Africa, 10 fath, (500) ; 
Chuaka, Zanzibar, 3 fath. (506), collected by Crossland. 


CRISIA INFLATA, sp.n. (PI. I. figs. 1, 2.) 


This is one of the most delicate species of Crisia, and is some- 
what like C. geniculata M.-Ed., but there are two alternate zocecia 
in a joint, the new node rising from the end of the last. The 
nodes of (C. geniculata are ee to three times as long, and the 
zocecial apertures of geniculata are about 0-075 mm., whereas i in 
inflata they are only about 0:04-0:05 mm. The very light 
corneous tubes of the joint are, when examined with a high 
power, found to be marked with fine longitudinal lines. 

The ovicell is suberect and is only an inflation of the zocecial 
tube, being the simplest ovicell known. From this character the 
specific name is chosen. The oceciostome is dorsal, so that it 
cannot be seen from the front, and is a small plain tube curved 
over, with a circular aperture 0:02-0:03 mm. The ovicell is not 


* (The parentheses around the names of authors placed after scientific names in 
this paper are used in accordance with Article 23 of the International Rules of 
Nomenclature (Proc. 7th Int. Cong., Boston 1907, p. 44 (1912))—Enprtor. | 


840 MR. A. W. WATERS ON 


elongate like the ovicell of geniculata, as figured by Busk and 
Harmer, and also as a specimen in my collection, Harmer 
considers that C. geniculata and C. cornuta must be separated, 
chiefly on account of differences in the ovicell, and although the 
present species is also allied there seem to be sufficient reasons 
for its separation. The C. crisidiodes Ort. has 2-3 zowcia to each 
internode, with three-jointed sete. 
Los. Wasin, Brit. E. Africa, 13 fath. (500), only one colony. 


Crista CIRCINATA, sp.n. (PI. I. figs. 7-9.) 

The zoarium divides into two main branches, and on each of 
these the fresh branches are mostly given off from the one side, 
and in the lower part of the zoarium the fresh branch arises at 
about the second zocecium, while in the younger part the branches 
start from about the fourth. The joints are light. The distance 
from zocecium to zocecium is about 0°27 mm., and the round 
zowcial aperture is about 0-08 mm. ‘There are fewer pores on 
the zocecia than in most Crisiw, and the zocecia extend free for a 
considerable distance. 

The ovicells, occurring just after a bifurcation, are large and 
erect, with the curved ocwciostome on the distal or dorsal surface 
of the ovicell, with the oceciopore only 0°05 mm. diameter. 

The ovicell of Crisia may appear to be central as in C. ramosa 
Harm., C. fistulosa Hell., etc., and is then long and pear-shaped, 
or it may appear to be at one side, and may be shorter, when 
we call it pomiform. There are others in which the ovicell is 
free, not being attached by its surface, and with the oceciostome 
on its dorsal surface instead of being directed forwards. Free 
ovicells occur in C. edwardsiuena VOrb., C. biciliata MacG., 
CO. howensis Maplestone. 

IT have felt much hesitation as to whether the form described 
is the Crisia cuneata Maplestone *, and it also has many points 
of resemblance with C. cylindrica Busk, but a different ovicell is 
figured. The Museum specimens (528, 853) of eylindrica have 
no ovicells. i 

Loc. Ras Osowamembe, Zanzibar Channel, 10 fath., only one 
specimen (504); Prison Island, Zanzibar Channel, 8 fath. (505) ; 
Brit. E. Africa, 10 fath. (520): collected by Crossland. 


ENTALOPHORA WASINENSIS, nom. nov. (Pl. II. figs. 1-4, 9; 
Text-fig. 1.) 

Entalophora deflexa Smitt, “ Floridan Bryozoa,” pt. i. p. 11, 
pl. v. figs. 28-30 (1872). 

As this does not seem to be the same as the small delicate 
British species known as deflewa Couch, I have given it another 
name. 

The specimens from Zanzibar are buried in sponge, which has 


* “Word Howe Island Polyzoa,’ Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict. vol. xvii. n.s., p. 390, 
pl. xxix. fig. 12 (1904). i 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR, 841 


grown over them. The zoarium is about 25 mm. high, dividing 
into many new branches at rather an acute angle. There are 
many zocecia, with long tubes all round the zoarium, with the 
oral aperture 0-09 mm.—O'l mm. There are 12 tentacles, and 
transverse sections show about 15-16 zoecia. 

The base of this species has not been seen, but #. proboscidea 
grows from a multiserial Stomatopora-like base, which often 
spreads for some distance before the erect growth commences. 

EL. defleca also starts from a Stomatopora base which is 


Text-figure 1. 


Entalophora wasinensis. * about 4. 


principally uniserial, though in places it may be biserial. The 
zocecia of this species, HZ. elegans Novm., and £. deflexa Couch, 
have the aperture about the same size and are allied ; and as the 
zoarial growth of H. elegans Norman ™* is similar, it is doubtful 


* * Polyzoa of Madeira,” Journ. Linn. Soc., Zool. vol. xxx. p. 281, pl. xxxv. figs. 4, 5 
(1909). 


842 MR. A. W. WATERS ON 


whether the greater projection of the zoccial tubes may not 
depend on local conditions. 

Only few ovicells have been found: one is small at the side 
just above a bifurcation, and has an oceciostome with a narrow 
opening and a somewhat triangular plate in front of it. The 
other ovicells have the occiostomes like those in the first, and 
spread round several zocecia without including any—that is, none 
pass through it. This structure was shown by Smitt (fig. 30). 

Very few ovicells of recent Entalophora have been described. 
Busk says of 2. delicatula B. “ocecium tumid,” but it has never 
been figured. In the ‘Challenger’ Report Busk, on pl. iv. 
fig. 1b, figures an irregular zocecium as an “ ovicell dilation,” but 
from an examination of the specimen I think this is a mistake, 
as there is no sign of more numerous perforations, which 
we seem always to find on the ovicells of these groups of 
Cyclostomata. 

In my collection there are ovicells on 2. regularis MacG. and 
FE. intricaria Busk*, but these and some other species, among 
which what I considered was 2. rugosa VOrb., from Naples, will 
probably have to be removed from Hutalophora, as sections show 
a distinct lamina, and the ovicells are wide with the zocecial 
tubes passing through, reminding us of the ovicells of Diastopora, 
with which they are closely allied, but whether they must be 
ealled Diastopora or Bidiastopora need not now be considered. 
Among fossils also, no doubt many must be removed from 
Entalophora to Diastoporide. D’Orbigny and others have also 
placed under Hntalophora many species now remoyed to 
Meliceritites. . 

The ovicells of fossil Hntalophera (Spiropora) annulosa Mich. 
are figured by Canu‘, and are fairly similar to the ovicells of the 
present species. Canu does not figure the zocecia spiral or 
regular, therefore why does he call it Sprropora ? 

Loc. Flovida (Smitt). Wasin, Brit. E. Africa, 10 fath. (501) 
(507); Ras Osowamembe, Zanzibar Channel, 10 fath. (504): 
collected by Crossland. 


FrnispARSA TUBULOSA (Busk). 


Hornera violacea var. tubulosa Busk, Cat. Mar. Poly. pt. iii. 
p- 19, pl. xviii. fig. 4: for synonyms see Waters, “ Austral. Bry.”, 
Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 5, vol. xx. p. 257 (1887); and “ Rep. 
Mar. Biol. of Sudanese Red Sea, Bryozoa,” Journ. Linn. Soe., Zool. 
vol. xxxi. p. 235, pl. xxv. figs. 16, 17 (1910); and add: Seguenza, 
Form. Terz. pp. 297, 372 (1879); De Stefani, “ Jejo Montalto e 


* E. intricaria Busk has the rays or spines on the outside of the zoccial tubes 
which pass through the ovicells. The lamina is not seen in all stages, and in the 
section which I figured, Q. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xliii., pl. xviii. fig. 5, none is seen 
though in other pieces it is quite distinct. j 

+“ Btudes sur les ovicells des Brvoz. du Bathonien d’Occaignes,” Bull. de la Soc. 
Géol. de France, 3™¢ sér. vol. xxvi. p. 282, figs. 19, 20 (1898). 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR. 843 


Capo Vat.”, Mem. R. Accad. d. Lincei, vol. xviii. p. 208 (1882), 
Neviani, “ Bri. Neog. delle Calabrie,” Pal. Ital. vol. vi. p. 234 
(1900). 

As Busk made a mistake about numbering his figures, it 
is difficult to understand what he meant, but in spite of this 
it seems advisable to retain his name. Apparently the type 
violacea also should be Filisparsa, and in the Norman collection 
specimens so named, from Flord, have none of the appearance of 
Hornera, but look like Filisparsa, having anterior ovicells which 
are broken down. There is among these specimens one piece of 
Hornera, perhaps lichenoides, evidently misplaced. 

The specimens from Wasin have the oral aperture about 
0-15 mm., corresponding in this respect with specimens from 
Naples and Australia, and here also the closure of the zoccial 
tube has a number of perforations similar in appearance to those 
of the zowcia. There are 14 tentacles. The ovicell spreads 
over the front, and the oceciostome, directed somewhat backwards, 
is about the width of the zoccial aperture, but in the longi- 
tudinal axis is only about 0-°O07mm. There can scarcely be said 
to be a funnel, although there is an irregular expansion which 
frequently curves over. 

The expansion and funnels of the occiostomes of the Cyclosto- 
mata are often very variable, so that too much weight must not 
be attached to their measurements; also some ovicells may be 
found with and others without funnels. 

There are some specimens from Zanzibar, apparently of this 
species, which in younger parts just touch the support at intervals, 
though there are no definite rows of dorsal projections as in 
Tubulipora pulchra MacG.; in the older parts there are strong 
calcareous radicles, sometimes formed of only one tube, but more 
frequently of two or three, which may divide at the end to form 
claspers. Jdmonea pedata Norman has still larger radicles the 
width of the zoarium, often formed by five or six tubes. 

A species from Naples, which I have considered to be the 
Tubulipora incrassata d’Orb. as more fully described and figured 
by Smitt, has zoecia much about the same size, and standing up 
in the same way; but the zoarium spreads out fan-shaped, instead 
of being unattached for a considerable distance, and is continuous 
about the same width. ‘The ovicell is situated as in 7’. tubulosa, 
with the oceciostome about the same size as the zoccial tubes, 
sometimes ending off straight, at other times with a funnel. 

Loc. Naples (W.); Victoria (MacG.); Holborn Island, Queens- 
land, 20 fath.; North Atlantic (4.). Ras Osowamembe, Zanzibar 
Channel, 10 fath. (504), collected by Crossland. 

Fossil. Tertiary : Rhodes, Sicily, ete. 


TERVIA IRREGULARIS (Meneghini). (Pl. IV. fig. 8.) 

Idmonea wregularis Meneghini, “ Polipi della fam. dei Tubul. 
finora osserv. nell’ Adriatico,” Nuovi Sagei del Accad. di Scienze, 

Proc. Zoot. Soc.—1914, No. LVII. o7 


844 MR. A. W. WATERS ON 


Padova, vol. vi. p. 12 (1844). For synonyms see Miss Jelly’s 
Catalogue and add :— 

Filisparsa irregularis Waters, ‘“Ovicells of Cyclost. Bry.,” Journ. 
Linn. Soc., Zool. vol. xx. p. 279, pl). xiv. figs. 5, 6 (1888); Norman, 
“ Poly. of Madeira,” Journ. Linn. Soc., Zool. vol. xxx. p. 279, 
pl. xxxiv. figs. 1-3 (1909). 

Tervia folini Calvet, “ Rech. de la Camp. du ‘ Caudan,’” Ann. 
de l’Univ. de Lyon, p. 265, pl. vil. figs. 1-3 (1896). 

Tervia irregularis, Jull. & Calv. “ Bry. de VHirondelle,” p. 114, 
& p. 157, pl. xiv. fig. 7 (1903). 

The proximal part of the zoarium has the zoecia irregularly 
placed as in Filisparsa; then later, usually after the first 
branching, there are distinct series on each side, often with isolated 
zocecia in the median line. The very earliest part, namely the 
primary, is like that of Stomatopora, being about the same size as 
ordinary zocciaand but very slightly expanded at the proximal 
end, whereas in Jxubulipora and many other Cyclostomata there 
is a large disk. This disk I have figured mm 7’ubelipora pulchra, 
and it has also been figured by Barrois, Robertson and others. 

Inside the zocecial tube, about the position where it becomes 
erect, there is on the proximal side a shallow comb-like process 
(Pl. IV. fig. 8). This is where the closure takes place. There 
are combs in some Membraniporide, and spimous processes in 
many Cyclostomata, but I have not found a similar comb in any 
other Cyclostomata and it does not oceur in Filisparsa tubulosa. 

Loc. Adriatic; Naples, 40 fath. ; Genoa: Bay of Biscay :* Azores, 
450 fath. (J. & C.); Madeira (V.); off Cape Blanco, West Africa, 
235 met. (J. & C.); Australia, Wasin, Brit. E. Africa, 10 fath. 
(507), collected by Crossland. 


TDMONEA MILNEANA d Orbigny. 


For synonyms and localities, see Waters, “Bry. from near Cape 
Horn,” Journ. Linn. Soe., Zool. vol. xxix. p. 249 (1904). 


From Ras Osowamembe, Zanzibar Channel, 10 fath. (504), 
collected by Crossland. 


IDMONEA RADIANS (Lamarck). (PI. IT. figs. 6, 7, 8, 10.) 

For synonyms see Miss Jelly’s Catalogue and add :— 

Dollman, W. P., Journ. Roy. Micr. Soc. pl. viii. 1906, photo- 
graph only; Philipps, E. G., “ Polyzoa collected by Dr. Willey,” 
Willey’s Zool. Results, pt. iv. p. 449 (1899); MacGillivray, 
‘“Monog. of the Tert. Polyzoa of Victoria,” Trans, Roy. Soe. Vict. 
vol. iv. p. 121, pl. xvi. fig. 18 (1895). 

Besides the more usual form with short branches (fig. 8a) there 
are from both localities specimens with long ones (fig. 8) having 
similar subparallel branches. MacGillivray has referred to a 
larger form, and Busk called it var. erecta. In the smaller 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR. 845 


form as a rule there are two zoccia to a series, though there 
may be three, especially near the growing ends, while the larger 
form has three zocecia or occasionally four. A range of inter- 
mediate sizes have been met with. 

The ovicells are anterior, near a bifurcation, or in other 
positions, even often half-way between two bifurcations; large 
pores or pits occur onthe surface. The oceciostome is on one side, 
most frequently by the first zovecium of the second series involved 
(fig. 6), though sometimes it occurs by the third series, but never 
more than one occiostome has been seen on an oviceil, and the 
tubular oceciostome turns over and downwards, resembling in 
position and form the oceciostomes of J. atlantica F., [. concava 
Rss., and /. parasitica Busk. 

The large lateral plates on the ovicell described by me* as 
occurring in Torres Straits and Australian specimens, are not 
seen in those from Zanzibar, though from the localities previously 
mentioned they are very distinct, and are also seen in the 
‘Challenger’ specimens from Tongatabu, and in the British 
Museum specimens from Cape Capricorn, where however they 
are elongate rather than round. There are no frontal ridges on 
the ovicell as described by MacGillivray. The series are about 
0-26 mm. apart, which is much closer together than in any other 
species measured. J. atlantica F. is 0-6-1 mm.; J. australis 
MacG. 0°75 mm.; J. concava Reuss 0°5 mm.; L. pedata Norm. 
0-45 mm.; J. tumida Sm. O17 mm. The zoccial aperture is about 
0-06 mm., whereas in J. atlantica it is 0°15 mm.; in J. milneana 
0-:16-0-2 mm. There are 8 tentacles. 

The ovicell consists of several lobes, there being on both sides 
one between each two series of zocecia, so that in a mature ovicell 
there are usually six such lobes. The embryos are small; the 
mature ones may be 071 mm. across or even a trifle larger, but the 
majority are smaller. There is not much difference from the 
embryos of Hntalophora wasinensis nov., though a little larger, 
but they are smaller than those of Diastopora intricaria Sm., 
0-12 mm. 

Ostroumoff? says the larvee of the Cyclostomata vary in size 
downwards from Hornera which is 0:48 mm., through Tubulipora, 
Frondipora, Lichenopora, to Crisia, which last is only 0-07 mm. 
In sections I have found Hornera lichenoides 0'4 mm. and various 
species of Crisia from 0:07-0°1. The range in the Cheilostomata 
is somewhat similar, as Diplodymoides is 0°08, and Systenopora 
0°37 mm. 

This is no doubt Crisina hochstetteriana Stoliczka t, but the 


* “ Bry. from New South Wales” etc., Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 5, vol. xx. 
p- 254, pl. vi. figs. 27,28 (1887). 
+ “Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Cyclost. Seebryozoen,” Mitt. Zool. Stat. zu 
Neapel, vol. vii. p. 180 (1887). 
{ “ Foss. Bry. der Grakei Bay bei Auckland,” Novara Expedition, p. 118, pl. xviii. 
fig. 3 (1864). : 
7 57* 


846 MR. A. W. WATERS ON 


I. hochstetteriana of MacGillivray * is clearly Hornera? fissurata, 
Busk. 

The name Jdmoneat is used in the sense it has been used for 
a long time, although recognising that im some cases it is difficult 
to ball distinctions Tatween Idmonea and Tubulipora, and that it 
is possible they may have to be merged. 

But Tubulipora spreads out continuously, whereas Jdmonee 
continues of the same width; also 7’wbuliporw has a more or less 
central ovicell with a central occiostome, while Jdmonea usually 
has the oceciostome near to the series at one side. Perhaps 
further study of the primaries and early growth, as well as the 
ovicells, may establish the position, but for the present no harm 
is doue by waiting until the whole of the group is better under- 
stood. 

Loc. New Zealand, Wanganui, ete.; Tongatabu, 18 fath. ; Hon- 
olulu, 20-40 fath.; Victoria ; Port Jackson (H.), Adelaide (4. Wy 
Sydney ; Port Stephens, 5-6 ‘fath.; Green Point, 8 fath.; Darnley 
Island, Torres Straits, 10-30 ea ; Cape Capricorn, B.M. coll. ; 
Lifu (Ph.); Port Elizabeth (in Miss Jelly’s collection). Both the 
small and the var. erecta forms from Ras Osowamembe, Zanzibar 
Channel, 10 fath. (504), and Prison Island, Zanzibar Channel, 
8 fath. (505), collected by Crossland. 

Fossil. Orakei Bay, N. Z.; Mount Gambier, S. Aust.; Bairns- 
dale, Gippsland. 


IpMONEA INTERJUNCTA MacGillivray. (PI. IT. fig. 5.) 


Idmonea interjuncta MacG. Trans. Roy. Soc. Vict. vol. xxii. 
p- 137, 10 (sep.) (1886); Waters, “ Austral. Bry.,” Ann. Mag. 
Nat. Hist. ser. 5, vol. xx. p. 256, pl. vi. fig. 29 (1887). 

Idmonea pedleyi Haswell, ‘‘ Cyclos. Polyzoa of Port Jackson,” 
Proc. Linn Soc. N.S. Wales, vol. iv. p. 351 (1880). 

Idmonea pulcherrima Kirkpatrick, ‘“‘ Hyd. and Poly. from the 
China Sea,” Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 6, vol. v. p. 22, pl. iv 
fiz. 6 (1890). 

The zocecial aperture is about 0°12 mm., and the oceciostome is 
the same'size. 

Some specimens from Ras Osowamembe have faint ridges on 
the dorsal surface, and by the side of these ridges are rows of 
pores, transverse to the zoarium. Lines of pores, though not as 
marked, are also found on Jdmonea milneana d’Orb., a species in 
many respects similar, but milneana is a larger species having the 
zocecial aperture larger. 

Loc. Port Phillip Heads (MacG.); Green Point, Port Jackson, 
8 fath. (Waters). Ras Osowamembe, Zanzibar Channel, 10 fath. 


* “Tert. Polyzoa of ee as Trans. Roy. Soc. Vict. vol. iv. p. 120, pl. xvi. 
figs. 12-16 (1895). 

“+ See my re-deseription “ On some Oviceils of Cycl. Bry.”, Jonrn. Linn. Soe., Zool. 
vol. xx. p. 275, pl. xiv. figs. 1, 3, 4, 7 (1888). 
ose Harmer, “ Devel. of Tubulipora,” Quart. Journ. Micr. Sc. vol. xli. n.s. p. 88 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR. 847 


(504); Prison Island, Zanzibar Channel, 8 fath. (505), collected 
by Crossland. 


AMATHIA LENDIGERA (Linneus). (Pl. IV. figs. 3, 4.) 


For synonyms see Miss Jelly’s Catalogue and add :— 

Amathia lendigera (L.), MacGillivray, “On the Australian 
Species of Amathia,” Proc. Roy. Sec. Vict. vol. vii. p. 185, pl. B. 
fig. 1 (1894): Calvet, “‘ Bry. Ectoproctes,” pl. vill. figs. 19, 20, 
pl. xiii. figs. 138, 21 (1900); “ Bry. Mar. des Cotes de Corse,” p. 46 
(1902); “ Bry. Mar. de la Région de Cette,” p. 90 (1902); Jullien 
& Calvet, “ Bry. de |’Hirondelle,” p. 31 (1903) ; Guerin-Ganivet, 
“Bry. de la Rég. de Concarneau,” Tr. Se. du Lab. de Zool. et de 
Phys. Mar. de Concarneau, vol. iv. p. 23 (1912). 

The stems of the specimens from Chuaka are about 0-07 mm. 
in diameter. This species differs from A. videvei Hell. in not 
having the zoecia spiral, also in the branching being more or 
less at right angles to the main branch (fig. 4), whereas in most 
Amathia the branches divide equally in both directions. Hincks 
has figured the branching of lendigera. 

Some sections of material from Swanage cut across the rosette- 
plate show the semicircle of cells, with nuclei at the end of the 
cell, directed to the pore; also the round mesenchym-cells with 
round nuclei are separated from the wall of the stolon, and are 
seen to pass over the mound of cells; up to this mound come the 
funicular threads with their elongate nuclei (fig. 3). The struc- 
ture of the cells near the rosette is very similar to that described 
in Zoobotryon (see page 850). 

Loc. British, French and Belgian coasts, Mediterranean, Adri- 
atic ; Corsica (40-60 met.) (Calvet); Azores (J. &@ C.); Western 
Port, Victoria (acG.). Chuaka, Zanzibar shore (521, 523), 
collected by Crossland. 


AMATHIA SEMICONVOLUTA (Lamouroux). 


Amathia semiconvoluta Lamx. Encycl. Méth., Zoophytes, p. 44 
(1824); Heller, “‘ Bry. Adriat.,” Verh. der K.I. zool.-bot. 
Ges. Wien, vol. xvii. p. 127, pl. v. figs. 1, 2 (1867); Calvet, Bry. 
Kctoproctes, pl. vii. figs. 8, 9, pl. viil. figs. 16, 18 (1900); “ Bry. 
Mar. de la Région de Cette,” Tr. Inst. de Zool. de |’Univ. de 
Montpellier, ser. 2, mém. 11, p. 89 (1902); Waters, Journ. Linn. 
Soc., Zool. vol. xxxi. pl. xxiv. fig. 6 (1910). 

Serialaria seniconvoluta Lamk. Hist. Nat. d’Anim. sans vert., 
ed. ii. vol. ii. p. 171 (1836); d’Orbigny, Pal. Frang. vol. v. p. 595 
(1850 -52). 

The yellowish thick chitin-stem is about 0°25 mm. diameter. 
Near the proximal end of each internode there is a clear oval 
spot, which is for the attachment of a radicle, yet although this 
mark for the attachment occurs in all internodes, radicles have 
only been seen in a very few cases. A similar mark for radicles 
oceurs in A, obligqua MacG., and also in A. brasiliensis Busk, of 


848 MR. A. W. WATERS ON 


the ‘Challenger,’ which no doubt is really A. semzconvoluta, but 

the character has not been found in any other species examined. 
Loc. Mediterranean ; Naples (A. W. IW. coll.) ; Adriatic (Heller). 

Wasin, Brit. E. Africa, 10 fath. (501), collected by Crossland. 


AMATHIA DISTANS Busk. 


Amathia distans Busk, Chall. Exp., Zool. vol. xvii. pt. 50. p. 33, 
pl. vii. fig. 1 (1886): MacGillivray, “On some 8. Australian 
Polyzoa,” Trans. Roy. Soc. 8. Australia, vol. xii. p. 30 (1889); 
“On the Austral. Sp. of Amathia,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Victoria, vol. 
vii. p. 134, pl. C. fig. 3 (1894); Waters, ‘ Mar. Biol. of the Sudanese 
Red Sea, Bryozoa,” Journ, Linn. Soc., Zool. vol. xxxi. p. 243, 
pl. xxiv. fig. 7 (1910). 

The A. distans B., A. tortwosa B., A. semiconvoluta Lamx., and 
A, vidovici Hell. form an incomplete spiral round the stem, only 
occupying part of the internode. The stem of A. distans is thin, 
measuring 0:07 mm. diameter in most of the present specimens. 
The ‘ Challenger’ specimens which I measured have the diameter 
about O'l mm. I seem to have measured some abnormal piece 
from Zanzibar which was stouter. From bifurcation to bifurcation 
is about 2 mm. long. There are 8 tentacles. 

Loc. Off Bahia, 10-20 fath. (B.); South Australia (MacG.) ; 
New South Wales (4. W.W. coll.). Zanzibar town, shore, marked 
“pink Polyzoum” (527), collected by Crossland. 


AMATHIA yipovici (Heller). (Pl. IV. figs. 1, 2.) 


Valkeria vidovici Heller, “ Die Bry. des Adriat. Meeres,” Verh. 
der K.K. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien, vol. xvii. p. 128, pl. v. figs. 3, 4 
(1867). 

Vesicularia dichotoma Verrill, ‘Invert. animals of Vineyard 
Sound,” Rep. Comm. of Fish and Fisheries for 1871-2, p. 874. 

Amathia lendigera Busk, Chall. Exp., Zool. vol. xvii. p. 33 (1886). 

Amathia dichotoma Osburn (Verrill), “ Bry. of the Woods Hole 
Region,” Bull. Bur. of Fish. vol. xxx. p. 254, pl. xxix. figs. 81, 81 a 
(1912). 

The zocecia at a bifurcation are in short biserial clusters, spirally 
arranged, encircling the stolon. There is sometimes a small 
cluster between a bifurcation as shown by Heller, whose figure 
was evidently froma dried specimen and is not entirely satis- 
factory. 

The branches are about 0-2 mm. in diameter. There are 8 
tentacles, which is the same as in A. lendigera L., A. senricon- 
voluta Lamx., A. brongniartii Kirkp., and A. distans B. ‘he 
gizzard is about 0-05—0-06 mm. diameter. 

The connecting cells on the two sides of the rosette-plates are 
fairly similar to those of Zoobotryon pellucidum Hhbr., radiating on 
both sides from the pore, and the cells near this pore stain more 
darkly than the others (fig. 2). 

Loc. Adriatic (Heller); Genoa (Waters coll.) ; Roscoff, sent to 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR. 849 


me by Jullien as A. semiconvoluta; Bermuda, 30 fath. (Chall.) ; 
Great Egg Harbour, N. J.; Long Island Sound (Verrill) ; Vine- 
yard Haven, Edgartown, Woods Hole, Nantucket (Osburn). 
Wasin, Brit. E. Africa, 10 fath. (500) (501), collected by Cross- 
land. 


ZOOBOTRYON PELLUCIDUM Ehrenberg. (Pl. III. figs. 4-12; 
PAP Ve tiestl2-) 


For synonyms see Waters, ‘‘ Mar. Biol. of the Sudanese Red Sea, 
Bryozoa,” Journ. Linn. Soc., Zool. vel. xxxi. p. 243, pl. iv. figs. 12, 
15 (1910), and add 22 Oshur n, “Bry. of the Tortugas Toland! 
Florida,” Pub. 182, Carnegie Inst. of W ashington, p. 218 (1914). 


The appearance of the specimens from Chases Bay, at first 
sight, suggest specific separation from Z. pellucidum, as on the 
whole length of the long internodes there are two distinct, wide 
series of zocecia closely crowded, but with vacant longitudinal spaces 
between the series. In the Naples specimens the existence of 
series of zocecia is obscured, as the zocecia in many cases seem to be 
scattered over the stem and the whole length is not usually 
covered; but an examination of the stolon of these N aples speci- 
mens after the zoecia have been removed, shows two groups of 
about four longitudinal rows of rosette-plates, so that the differ- 
ences between the Naples and Zanzibar specimens are but slight, 
although the conditions of luxuriance are very different. Huincks’s 
name of biserialis and } MacGillivray’s bilateralis would have been 
very suitable for this form. There are frequently more than 
three branches at the end of the internode, sometimes as many 
as SIX. 

The zoecia are about 0°3 mm. long, and in the sections made 
the ova are usually single, or in some cases there are two in an 
ovarium. 

The embryo is surrounded by an ovicell sac, much the same as 
in Adeonelle * and in Diplodidymia*, the crowth of the embryo 
and of the sac going on simultaneously, and in many cases they 
are so close together that at first it is difficult to distinguish the 
sac from the embryo. In these cases the ovum must pass to the 
distal end under the operculum, from where it is developed. 

On the other hand, in most of the Cheilostomata and in the 
Cyclostomata, the ovicell is formed before the embryo is ready for 
it. In the Cyclostomata the walls may be seen starting at various 
points f to ultimately unite to form the ovicell. 

The rosette-plates were first described by Reichert? in this 
species, and it does not seem that anyone, except Smitt, had 
previously described anything of the kind, but what Smitt figured 


* Waters, “ Bry. from Zanzibar,” Proc. Zool. Soc. 1913, p. 529, pl. Ixxili. figs. 3 
& 5, and p. 490, text-fig. 79. 

+ ©On the Ovicells of some Lichenopore,”’ Journ. Linn. Soc., Zool. vol. xx. pl. xv. 
fig. 6 (1888); “ Mar. Biol. Sud. Red Sea, Bry..” Journ. Linn. Soc., Zool. vol. xxxi. 

. xxv. fig. 16 (1909). 

E: Vere. Anat. Untersuch. ti. Zoobotryon pellucidus, Ehr.,” Abhand. k. Akad. der 
Wiss. Berlin, p- 276 (1869). 


850 MR. A. W. WATERS ON 


as a communication pore was evidently the entire plate, it not 
being realised that there were not large pores, but only minute 
perforations. Reichert described and figured the plate as with a 
central perforation with 8-10 pores round it * (pl. iii. fig. 7), but 
this is not the case, as there is only one? perforation, and what 
Reichert took to be pores surrounding a central pore are really 
a cirele of cells, on the older side of the rosette-plate, with a 
relatively large round nucleus anda thin prolongation. The disk 
is thinner than the surrounding walls, as figured by Reichert 
(loc. cit. pl. iii. fig. 7). Sections and preparations of Zoobotryon 
from Naples, the Soudan and Wasin, enable me to add slightly to 
our knowledge of this species. 

By the rosette-plates of the zocecia the cells just mentioned 
often stain very darkly, so that no structure can be seen, but in 
other cases the plate is seen with all these cells in a semicircle = 
(PI. III. figs. 7, 8, 9, 12) pointing their thinner edge to the centre, 
or with them even raised to the one minute opening. Above, 
that is on the younger side of the rosette-plate, there are a 
number of cells, probably usually the same number as below, anc 
these also have long thread-like projections which pass to the 
opening to touch the projections of the under circle of cells, that 
is as if eight fingers from below were raised to touch eight fingers 
from above. From both sets of cells spread other cells in a 
more or less radiating manner, and to these mounds of cells the 
funicular or plasma-threads reach, distinguishable from the others 
by their elongated nuclei. These plasma-cords spread to all the 
organs of the zoarium. 

The layer of mesenchym-cells lining the zocecial walls (PI. II. 
fig. 10; Pl. IV. figs. 2, 3) spread to this mound of cells, and can 
be distinguished by the round cells and round nuclei from the 
funicular threads with their long cells and elongate nuclei. There 
is sometimes on one side a more or less semicircular cover over 
the circle of radiating cells, which it is difficult to understand, 
and they never occur in the early stages, and certainly they 
cannot be continuous all over or there would be no connection 
from the two sides. 

An ovum is often seen pretty near to the rosette-plate, so that 
it must move up to the distal end to be enclosed in the ovisac. 
When there is an ovum, and usually in the older zoocia, there is 
a considerable change in the funiculus near to the rosette-plate, 
as it has become granular (PI. IIT. figs. 10, 11), so that from this 
appearance the condition of the zocecium can be surmised. 

Nitsche$ spoke of the accumulation of cells over the rosette- 
plate as a “‘Pfropf” (plug or stopper), and Reichert mentioned 


* This figure was copied by Hincks, Brit. Mar. Poly. p. ix, fig. 4. 

+ Joliet, Bry. des Cotes de France, p. 31, footnote, says that Bowerbenkia has only 
one perforation. AsI have previously stated, Zoobotryon and Bowerbankia should 
not be generically separated. 

t This is the “joneturie” of Jullien, who describes a similar arrangement of cells 
to the joncturie of Schizoporella malusii Aud., ‘Cap Horn,’ p. 42. 

§ ‘ Beitr. z. Kennt. der Bryozoen,” Zeit. f. wiss. Zool. vol. xxi. p. 9 (1871). 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR, 851 


the thickening of the “‘Communale Bewegungsorgan ” above and 
below the septa, whereas F. Miiller od ealliadl it a ganglion, 
maintaining that there was a common nervous system “through 
the colony; also Smitt *, in Bugula, called them colonial nervous 
ganglia. We have seen that to these mounds of cells the network 
of plasma threads reaches, and this 1s what has been ealled the 
colonial nervous system and the colonial organ of movement, and 
it was figured by Miller, Reichert, and Nitsche-as a stout, solid 
or tubular body, but Henetiendl there are a number of anastomosing 
and reticulate threads, though with very low powers it may look 
like a band: neither alive nor in stained sections is any such 
solid or tubular band seen. Nitsche’s figures must be looked 
upon as diagrammatic,and Reichert’s, as I have previously stated, 
as though he had Zoobotryon in a pathological condition, and it is 
to be regretted that Hincks copied his figures. Vigelius, Freese, 
and others have correctly understood these plasma threads. 

It is strange that no histological work has been done on 
Zoobotryon, as it is eminently suitable for elucidating many 
interesting and important points of cell-structure, etc. 

The name rosette-plate was given supposing that there was a 
rosette of pores, whereas there is really a rosette of cells. 

Loc. Add: Florida (Osb.); Chuaka Bay, Zanzibar, 2 fath. (509), 
collected by Crossland. 


BowERBANKIA PuSTULOSA (Ellis & Solander). 


Sertularia pustulosa Ellis & Solander, ‘‘ Nat. Hist. of many 
curious and uncommon Zoophytes,” p. 54 (17&6). 

Bowerbankia pustulosa Hincks, Brit. Mar. Poly. p. 92 
pl. Ixxvi. figs. 1, 5 (1880); Calvet, “ Bry. Ectoproctes,” pl. vi. fig. 13, 
pl. vii. fies’ 4- 8, Ole WIM, Teva, AN Golly axe ibe, Wey yolks oa, figs. 18, is 
pl. xu. figs, 15- i, jolle, sani figs. 11, 14 (1900). 


The descriptions and determinations of Lowerbankia are so 
uncertain that there seems little object in giving a full list of 
synonyms. This species has been mistaken 7 for Valkeria uva L. 
and 5. imbricata Adams. 

Loc. British; Mediterranean ; Chuaka, Zanzibar Channel, shore 
(523), collected by Crossland. 


MIMOSELLA BIGEMINATA, Sp. n. (PI. IIT. figs. 1-3.) 


The zoarium eonsists of unbranched stems (about 0°3 mm. 
diameter) rising from a spreading stolon (about 0°15 mm.). The 
first internode of the stem is long (say about 1:65 mm.) followed 
by one about 0-4 mm., and then the remaining ones are shorter, 
say 0°35 mm. There may be as many as 50 internodes in a stem. 
In the lower internodes there is only a pair of opposite zocecia 
close to the distal end, but after the second or third internode there 
is a second pair placed rather to the side and lower down but 

* Hafs-Bry. Utveck. Ofv. Stockh. Akad. xxii. pl. vi. fig. 7 (1865). 


+ See Waters, “ Mar. Biol. of the Sudanese Red Sea, Bryozoa,’ Journ. Linn. Soc., 
Zool. vol. xxxi. pp. 249, 250 (1910). 


852 MR, A. W. WATERS ON 


close to the other pair. There are several cases where there has 
apparently been an injury, and a new branch grows from the side 
of the broken one, and then, although the original stem has had 
the double pairs of zocecia, yet the new growth may have more 

than two internodes with only a pair of zocecia, but subsequently 
there are two pairs to each, though special causes may occasion 
irregularities. The diaphragm at the base of a zoccium has one 
pore. Near the base of the zocecium there are strong muscles for 
moving the zocecium, and similar muscles occur in Jf, gracilis H.., 
although Hincks said there were none. The new species differs 
from WM. gracilis H. in the stems not branching, and in having 
four zoeecia grouped at the distal end of the internode. 

Triticella armata Verrill has the zoarial growth very similar to 
that of Mimosella, but, according to Osburn*, it has a gizzard, 
and evidently does not belong to the present group. 

The name bigeminata was suggested by Dr Harmer, who, when 
T told him that I had found aot figured this Wimosella, thought 
that he had also found it in the ‘Siboga’ material. When he 
showed me- his specimens, which are from better material than 
mine, the identity seemed to me quite clear, and, on seeing mine, 
Dr. Harmer agreed that this was the case, so that, with his 
permission, the name originally proposed has been changed. 

Loc. Ras Osowamembe, Zanzibar Channel, 10 fath. (504), 
collected by Crossland. 

There is a small fragment of another J/imosella from Chuaka, 
which I hesitate to name as it is incomplete. Just below the 
diaphragm of the main stem there is a lateral stem on each side, 
and each of these has two or three single zoecia growing direct 
from the stem and directed distally, with this free unoceupied 
stem continuing beyond the zoccia. On the lateral stem there is 
a diaphragm before and after each zocecium. In one lateral stem 
there are two plates of attachment, as if there had been two pairs 
of zoeecia, though on all the others the zocecia are uniserial. The 
zovecia are about 0°25 mm.—0°3 mm. long. The stem is about 
0-02 mm. diam. The growth of this species somewhat reminds us 
of Farrella atlantica B., which, however, has the zocecia more or Jess 
stalked, whereas in this Wimosella the base of the zocecium is 
rounded like that of Bowerbankia. In Valkeria uva L. there is a 
diaphragm above and below the group of zocecia, whereas in 
Mimosela gracilis H., F. atlantica, and this species ‘there i is only 
the one diaphragm just beyond the branches. 


FarrELLA ATLANTICA Busk. (Pl. IV. fig. 9.) 


Farrella atlantica Busk, ‘Challenger’ Exped., Zool. vol. xvii. 
p. 37, pl. vu. fig. 3 (1886); Thornely, ‘‘ Rep. Pearl-Oyster 
Fisheries of the Gulf of Manaar,” p. 128 (1905); ‘Mar. Poly. 
Ind. Ocean,” Trans. Linn. Soc. vol. xv. p. 157 (1912). 


* Osburn calls it Hippuraria, but I have shown that the genus was founded on a 
mistake, as the “stem” was a seaweed upon which it grew: see “ Rep. Sudanese 
Bry..” Journ. Linn. Soc., Zool. vol. xxxi. p. 241, 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR. 853 


Hippuraria verticillata Hincks (non Heller), Ann. Mag. Nat. 
Hist. ser. 5, vol. xix. p. 311, pl. ix. fig. 8 (1887). 

I have only found a small piece from the Red Sea, but it 1s 
evidently widely distributed, as I have it from Naples, the Red 
Sea, and Zanzibar. 

The rhizome of the Zanzibar specimens is 0°01 mm. in diameter ; 
the zocecia are 0-4 mm. long and 9-1 mm. wide, about the size 
given by Busk. At intervals on the stalk there is a pair of 
zocecia growing from an expanded part, and there is often from 
the same expansions a pair of radicles growing at right angles to 
the stalk; also frequently there are lateral branches near to the 
expansions, and these sometimes have pairs of zocecia near to the 
main branch. | 

A zoecium from which a polypide has disappeared usually 
assumes a Swollen * barrel-shape (PI. LV. fig. 9, 6), as the muscles 
which kept them in shape have now disappeared, and the same 
kind of thing occurs in many Ctenostomata. 

IT am unable to follow Hincks when he identifies his Hippu- 
raria verticillata + with Heller's species; also I have shown that 
the genus Hippuraria was founded upon a mistake, and is only a 
synonym of 7'ridécella. Although Hincks speaks of a group of 
cells at the joint, the figure shows a pair, and perhaps other nearly 
adjacent pairs have given the appearance of a group, so that, 
although I have scarcely any doubt as to Hincks’s verticillata 
being a synonym of Busk’s atlantica, there is just the possibility 
of this not being the case. 

The peduncle is attached to the zowcium excentrically, and 
there is a muscle from the side of the wall to the projecting base 
of the zocecium by which it is moved as a whole. 

There is a somewhat similar muscle in Mimosella gracilis 
Hincks. Joliet mentions this also in his Valkeria nutans =, and 
Hincks was apparently unaware of Joliet’s later description when 
describing H. verticillata. Heller’s figure of Valkeria verticillata, 
and Hincks’s figure of Valkeria wva in the ‘ British Marine 
Polyzoa’ are very similar. 

Loc. Bahia, 10-20 fath. (Chall.); Naples (4. W. W. coll.) ; 
Adriatic ; Suez; Ceylon (Z7%.); Indian Ocean (7h.); Amirante, 
25 fath. (7h.); Providence, 50-78 fath.(Zh.). Ras Osowamembe, 
Zanzibar Channel, 10 fath. (504); Wasin, Brit. E. Africa, 10 fath. 
(500), collected by Crossland. 


VALKERIA UvA (Linneus). 


For synonyms see Waters, ‘‘ Mar. Biol. of the Sudanese Red 
Sea, Cyclostomata, Ctenostomata, and Endoprocta,” Journ. Linn. 
Soc., Zool. vol. xxxi. p. 250, pl. xxiv. fig. 13, pl. xxv. figs. 4, 
12, 13 (1910); Osburn, “Biol. Survey of Woods Hole and 


* Journ. Linn. Soc., Zool. vol. xxxi. p. 239, pl. xxv. fig. 6. 
+ Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 5, vol. xix. p. 311, pl. ix. fig. 8 (1887). 
£ “Etudes Anat. & Emb. sur le Pyrosoma giganteum,” p. 106, pl. v. fig. 4 (1888). 


854 MR. A. W. WATERS ON 


Vicinity,” Bull. Bureau of Fisheries, vol. xxxi. pt. 2, p. 606 
(1911). 

The specimens from Chuaka have groups of zocecia at distant 
intervals, and there are fully formed embryos in the zocecia. 

Loc. See above and add: Vineyard Sound, 6-8 fath. ete. 
Chuaka, Zanzibar, 2 fath., on seaweed with Starpanie dendro- 
grapta Waters (508); aud Chuaka shore, on Amathia lendigera 
(521): collected by Crossland. 


CYLINDR@CIUM GIGANTEUM (Busk). 


 Farrella gigantea Busk, Quart. Journ. Micr. Se. vol. iv. p. 93, 
pl. v. figs. 1, 2 (1856). 

Cylindreecium giganteum Hincks, Brit. Mar. Poly. p. 535, 
pl. Ixxvii. figs. 3, 4 (1880). 


The largest zoccia from Chuaka are about 0°25 mm, long. 
There is no dilation at the base, and the contents of the wall are 
mostly calcareous, giving it a white appearance, so that at first 
I was inclined to Teal it var. album. When placed in acid it 
becomes transparent. The determination of Cylindrecium is 
always very unsatisfactory, and probably C. gigantewm and 
C. dilatatum have not always been correctly distinguished. 

The stolons branch in various directions. 

Loc. British; Mediterranean; Red Sea; off Portugal; Ceylon ; 
Cargados ; Farquhar Reef (7’.); Queen Charlotte Island ; Tor- 
tugas. Chuaka, Zanzibar, 2 fath. (508); Prison Island, Zanzibar, 
collected by Crossland. 


Busk1A NITENS Alder. 


Buskia nitens Alder, Q. J. Micr. Sc. vol. v. p. 24, pl. xiii. figs. 1,2 
(1857); Hincks, Brit. Wars Poly. p. 532, pl. iin figs. 6, 7, Onn 
cut, fig. 28 (1880) ; Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 5, ak xili. p. Os 
Levinsen, ‘“ Zool. Danica, Mosdyr,” p. 83, pl. viii. figs. 12, 13 
(1894). 

From Ras Osowamembe, growing on the stalk of I/imosella 
bigeminata, nov. Levinsen says that there are 8 tentacles. 

Loc. Arctic; Davis Strait, 100 fath. ; British; Danish ; Queen 
Charlotte Island (#.). Ras Osowamembe, Zanzibar Channel, 
10 fath. (504), collected by Crossland. 


PEDICELLINA SPINOSA (Robertson). (Pi. IV. figs. 10, 11.) 


Myosoma spinosa Robertson, “Studies in Pacific Coast Euto- 
procta,” Proc. Calif. Acad. of Sciences, ser, 3, vol. il. p. 324, 
pl. xvi. figs. 1-12 (1900). 

There are two specimens from Wasin, which well show most of 
the characters mentioned by Dr. Alice Robertson. ‘The spines 
en both the stalk and calyx are stout and long, whereas those on 
P.cernua may be called almost hairs, and the spines are abundant 
on the one side and absent on the other, the obliquity of the ten- 
tacular region also occurs. The number of tentacles is about 14. 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR. 855 


The stalk is broad, especially at the base, and is also wide 
where the calyx is attached, though not so wide as figured by 
Robertson in many of the figures, but she shows a distinct 
separation in fig. 4. In the stolon there is a septum pretty near 
to the stalk on each side of it, and there is a considerable space 
from stalk to stalk. 

‘The preparation was stained and mounted for some other more 
transparent species, and it is not suitable for following any 
inuscle from the stalk up the calyx, nor am I able to see anything 
suggesting it. 

While unable to aceept the genus Myosoma at present, of 
which I have been unable to make sections, it may turn out that 
it is advisable to retain the genus. 

1 now think that the Pedicellina from Naples with numerous 
stout recurved spines, to which I referred*, is P. hirsuta Jull. 

Loc. Tomales Bay, California, beach; Fort Point and San 
Pedro, California. Wastin, Brit. E. Africa, 10 fath., with Coral- 
lina etc. (500), collected by Crossland. 


BARENTSIA GRACILIS (Sars). 


For synonyms see Waters, ‘“‘ Rep. Mar. Biol. of the Sudanese 
Red Sea, pt. 11.,” Journ. Linn. Soce., Zool. vol. xxxi. p. 251 (1910) 
and add :— 

Pedicellina gracilis Pottinger, ‘“‘ Anat. des Pédicellines de la Cote 
d’Ostende,” Arch. de Biol. vol. vil. p. 300, etc. (1886). 

Ascopodaria gracilis Norman, “'The Polyzoa of Madeira and 
neigh. Isl.,” Journ. Linn. Soc., Zool. vol. xxx. p. 277 (1909). 

Some of the stalks have the swelling in the middle, which have 
been found from many places, and in consequence of which the 
species nodosa was made. James Ritchie? has confirmed what 
I have said ¢ as to the genus Gonopodaria being superfluous. 

Loc. Arctic; European coast, generally; Mediterranean ; Red 
Sea; Madeira; Australasia. Ras Osowamembe, Zanzibar 
Channel, 10 fath. (6504); Wasin, Brit. EK. Africa, 10 fath. (500) ; 
Chuaka, Zanzibar, ‘from growth on elytron of Aphroditid” ; 
Chuaka, Zanzibar, 2 fath. (508), (509), (519): collected by 


Crossland. 
LoxosoMA SINGULARE Keferstein. 


Lowxosoma singulare Kef. Zeit. wiss. Zool. vol. xii. p. 13, pl. xi. 
fig. 29 (1862); and add to Miss Jelly’s Catalogue :— 

Loxosoma singulare Jull. & Calvet, “ Bry. prov. de l’Hiron- 
delle,” p. 28, pl. 1. fig. 5(1903) ; Harmer, ‘‘ Struct. and Devel. of 
Loxosoma,” Q. J. Micr. Se. 1885, p. 4 . 


There are a number of specimens growing on Schizoporella 


p. 252 (1910). 

+ “On an Entoproctan Polyzoon (Barentsia benedenz) new to the British Isles,” 
Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin. vol. xlvii. p. 835 (1911). 

t “ Résultats du Voy. du S.Y. * Belgica’—Bryozoa,” p. 100 (1904); “ Mar. Biol. 
Sud. Red Sea, pt. 1,” Journ. Linn. Soc., Zool. yol. xxxi, p. 252 (1910), 


856 MR. A. W. WATERS ON 


nivea B.,and they are mostly, or at any rate exceeding frequently, 
attached to the operculum, indicating that the movement gained 
in this way is favourable to the Loxosoma. 

Loc. Holland (Kef.); Shetland (Hincks); Naples (Harmer, 
etc.); Newfoundland (J. & C.). Prison Island, Zanzibar Channel, 
8 fath. (505), collected by Crossland. 


ADDENDUM. 


Since I wrote about Lagenipora socialis H. in the description 
of the Cheilostomata from Zanzibar, pt. i. p. 510 (1913), I have 
examined the Norman Collection, recently sent to the British 
Museum, and there is a specimen from Hastings, sent by 
Mr. Hincks to Canon Norman as Lagenipora socialis, which has 
a pore at each corner of the ridge, as I described in the Guernsey 
specimens. 

This entirely confirms the view that Lagenipora socialis is the 
type of the group which [I have several times maintained was 
Lagenipora, but which Levinsen has called Siniopelta. By this 
specimen it is now definitely settled, and does not admit of 
further question, but the examination has brought out another 
interesting point. The Cedleporella Norman belongs to the same 
genus, which, however, Norman at some time recognised, for he 
wrote on Hincks’s co-type of Lagenipora socialis, “ Celleporella 
lepralioides.” However, under C. lepralioides he had two species, 
first the Z. socialis, and then from Guernsey and from Hardanger 
Fiord specimens with several pores by the ridge of the ovicell, 
which are probably Z. lucida, as well as L. socialis, both of which 
he had identified with Celleporella lepralioides. Of course, Celle- 
porella has to disappear, as it was not recognisable from the 
description and figure. 

I might have mentioned in the same paper, when speaking of 
Actea, p. 464, that what I call the bulging out of the zoecial 
wall, for the ovum, before the ovicell has been formed, has been 
figured by Prouho in Cylindrecium™. 

In looking over seaweed for Pedicellina a few zocecia of Lepralia 
poissonit Aud, have been met with from Wasin, Brit. EK. Africa, 
10 fathoms. The primary zocecium has two or three more spines 
than Levinsen’s figures. The species is known from the Atlantic, 
Australasia, Indian Ocean, and Japan (A. W. W. coll.), and is a 
common species in many localities. It also oceurs fossil. 


From Chuaka, 3 fathoms (523), a few zocecia of Beania inter- 
media Hincks were found. There are no frontal spines, and near 
the proximal end there is a large plate for the attachment of the 
radicle, and at each side of this, near the border of the zoccium 
either at the same level as the radicle or higher up, there is a 


* Contrib. a Vhist. des Bryoz. »” Arch. Zool. Ex ér. gme ser. vol. e A 
figs. 14-17 (1892). : P x, pl. xxiv. 


BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR. 857 


tubular projection, and from one of these a new zoccium may 
grow. Close up to the distal border on the dorsal surface there 
is on each side a small pore, which, however, is not seen in the 
Chatham Island specimens. Now I have previously remarked 
that most ‘* Beanie have six tubular connections, whereas this 
has only four,” so that there is reasonable ground for considering 
these as vestigial, thus representing six connections. Two pores 
are found in this position in several Cheilostomata, as Brettia, 
Cateicella, etc., and we may, perhaps, now see the significance of 
these spots or disks. 

The zocecia are about a third larger than those from the 
Chatham Islands and twice as large as those from New Zealand. 

The B. intermedia has been found in New Zealand, Tasmania 
(H.), Chatham Islands (W.), Red Sea (W.), Australia, Indian 


Ocean. 


EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. 


Prate I. 
Fig. 1. Crisia inflata, sp.n. 25. From Wasin. 
Do. do. X 85. Showing ovicell. 
. Crisia elongata M.-Ed. X12. From Wasin. 
Do. do. Natural size. 
Crisia sertularoides Aud. X25. From Wasin. 
Do. do. x 3. 
Crisia circinata, sp.n. X12. From Ras Osowamembe. 
Do. do. X about 2. 
Do. do. X 25. Ovicell seen from the side. 


G2) C9) SSH Gm ONE COS) 


Puate If. 

Fig. 1. Entalophora wasinensis, nom.n. X 25. Showing ovicell. From Wasin. 

Do. do. x 60. Section of ovicells containing embryos. 

Do. do. X 330. Embryo. 

Do. do. X 85. Section of ovicell containing embryos. 

. Idmonea interjuncta MacG. X12. Showing ovicell with oceciostome (oe.). 

From Ras Osowamembe. 

. Idmonea radians, var. erecta Busk. X25. Showing ovicells with ocecio- 

stome (oe.). From Ras Osowamembe. 

Do. do. do. X 25. Longitudinal section of the ovieell. Cut 

parallel to the anterior and dorsal surfaces. 

Do. do. do. Natural size, showing the position of the ovicells 

Fig. a. Idmonea radians Lam. typica. Natural size. 

. Entalophora wasinensis, nom.n. X 330. Section of the surface pore-tubes ; 

(m.) exterior membrane. 

. Idmonea radians, var. erecta Busk. X85. Section from the anterior to 
the dorsal surface of the zoarium, showing the lobes of the ovicell and 
the ooeciostome (0e.) as well as the polypides (p.). The structure of the 
wall of the ovicell is seen at the left (s¢.) with one or two rosette-plates 
at the base of the broad pore-tube. There is an outer membrane (m.). 


Oo DM ST D MBO 


a 
i=) 


Puate III. 


Fig. 1. Mimosella bigeminata, sp.n. X85. Showing the lower internode with 
only a pair of zocecia, while the upper one has two 
pairs. From Ras Osowamembe. 


2. Do. do. X 6. Showing several stems growing from the creeping 
stolon. 
3. Do. do. < 85. Showing a new stem growing from the side of 


an old one after mutilation, 


858 ON BRYOZOA FROM ZANZIBAR. 


Fig. 4. Zoobotryon pellucidum Ehr. 250. Embryo in ovisac (0s.). Zocecial 
wall (zw.). This shows the embryo hollow, which 
is very generally the case in embryos of this type. 

5. Do. do. < 200. Disk of rosette-plate showing one small pore 
in the centre. 

6. Do. do. < 375. Disk of rosette-plate with a circle of cells 
round the pore. 

Ac Do. do. X 700. Section across the rosette-plate showing cells 
directed to the small opening; with meseuchym 
cells above. Only two of the radiating cells above 
the rosette-p'ate are shown, as the others are only 
seen in a different focus, but there will be 8 or 9. 

8. Do. do. X 330. Section across the rosette-plate in a septum of 
amain stolon. Showing a spreading plasma with 
cells scattered about. From the Sudan. 


9. Do. do. x 700. Section across the rosette-plate from the stolon 
to the zocwecium. 
10. Do. do. X 330. Section across the rosette-plate; above it there 


is an irregular granular mass. ‘This is in a zoceciuim 
in which there is an ovarium, and degeneration has 
taken place. 

iit Do. do. X 330. Section across the rosette-plate from a stolon 
to a zocecium, showing irregular granular masses in 
a zoccium that is degenerating. 

12. Do. do. < 330. Section across the rosette-plate from a stolon 
to a zocecium. 


In all cases the figures show the older part below the rosette-plate, and the 
younger above. 


Puate LV. 


Fig. 1. Amathia vidovici Hell. X 12. From Wasin. 

2. Do. do. >< 330. Section where a new branch is formed on each 
side, showing the cells round the two rosette-plates. 
The plug of cells on the lett are not cut close to the 
opening of the rosette-plate, and the two inner plugs 
have become somewhat granular. 

3. Amathia lendigeraL. 500. Section through the rosette-plate of the 
septum of the stolon. Examined with 1/12 
immersion. From Swanage. 

4. Do. do. X 25. Showing the branch at a bifurcation arising 
almost at right angles to the main stem. 

5. Crisia denticulata Lamk. X 330. Section through the inner wall of a 
zocecium, showing the connections from zocecium to zocecium (¢.). From 
Swanage. 

6. Crisia elongata M.-Ed.  X 250. Proximal end of zowecium—(a.) showing 
connection to the two neighbouring zoccia, through numerous tubes in 
which there is a septum in the middle, zocecial walls (w.). From Wasin. 

7. Stomatopora. Vrimary zowcium. X 85. 

8. Tervia irregularis Meneghini. Comb-like process in the zoccial tube near 
where it becomes erect. From Naples. 

9. Farrella atlantica Busk. X85. From Ras Osowamembe. 

10. Pedicellina spinosa Robertson. X 85. From Wasin. 

11. Do. do. x 25. 

12. Zoobotryon pellucidum Ehr. Natural size. From Chuaka Bay. 


ON AVIAN CESTODES. 859 


47. Contributions to the Anatomy and Systematic Arrange- 
ment of the Cestoidea. By Frank H. Brepparp, M.A., 
D.Sc., F.R.S., F.Z.8., Prosector to the Society. 


[Received May 65,1914: Read June 9, 1914. ] 
(Text-figures 1-11.) 


XIV. ON A NEW SPECIES OF RHABDOMETRA, AND ON THE 
PARUTERINE ORGAN IN O7IDIT_-ENIA. 


INDEX. 
Page 
Description of Rhabdometra cylindrica, sp. n. ............... 859 
Paruterine Organ of Otiditenia ewpodotidis Beddard ...... 879 


I have recently obtained a considerable number of examples of 
a Tapeworm from an African Partridge, Caccabis melanocephala, 
which [ refer, temporarily at least, to the genus Rhabdometra, 
though a closer comparison of this worm with the known species 
of Lhabdometra may ultimately necessitate its separation from that 
genus. The worm occurred in the Partridge associated with 
several other species, and I found always a relationship in numbers 
between the different forms which inhabited that bird. I examined 
altogether five specimens of the Caccabis in three of which were 
found examples of the Rhabdometra. In two examples there were 
a large number of specimens of the Rhabdometra, and in the other 
example only two specimens. The birds, which were infested by 
many specimens of Ahabdometra, contained also apparently only 
one representative of other species of Tapeworms. In the one 
ease it was a Davainea and in the other a Cotugnia (¢?) In the 
bird where there were only two Lhabdometra there were many 
Davainee. 

The general appearance of this worm is indicated in text-fig. 1. 
It is long and slender; when alive the longest examples were 
fully six inches or so in length. In spirit the dimensions are 
somewhat lessened. This great length is accompanied by only a 
small diameter; the width varies from something under one 
millimetre, to a little over a millimetre. The greatest diameter 
was anteriorly in the body but some way behind the head; here 
the proglottids are broader than long. ‘The scolex as a rule 
appears to be a little less in diameter than the ensuing region of 
the .strobila. But occasionally, as depicted in text-fig. 1 A, the 
scolex stands out as a globular body followed by a constriction. 
In an examination of the living worms I noted one example in 
which there was no neck, an unsegmented region following upon 
the scolex ; and I have one mounted preparation (represented in 
text-fig. 2), where the same feature is to be seen. But I have no 
note as to whether these examples were the same. As a general 


Proc. Zoou. Soc.—i914, No. LVIII. 58 


860 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


rule there is no neck and segmentation begins immediately after 
the scolex. The scolex is rather small and the suckers are large 
in proportion, occupying most of the area of the scolex. There 
was no trace of any hooks whether related to a rostellum or upon 
the suckers. I ascertained this by transverse and longitudinal 
sections as well as by the examination of entire scolices mounted 


Text-figure 1. 


A. Head-end of an example of Rhabdometra cylindrica. 


B. Another and complete specimen of the same species. 


in glycerine. It is very important to be positive upon this point, 
since the difference between the genera habdometra and Paru- 
terina is practically entirely to be found in the absence in one and 
the presence in the other of a rostellum armed with hooks. The 
strobila consists of proglottids, which are at first narrow and then 


AVIAN GESTODES. 861 


rather wider, ‘The end of the body, often more than one half of 
the entire worm, is made up of very long proglottids which I 
found to measure as much as five and six millimetres in length. 
They are thus quite as much as or even more than six times as 
long as they are broad. There is no one of the known species 
of Rhabdometra in which the ripe proglottids are so long as in 
the species described in the present communication. It may be, 


Text-figure 2. 


Anterior end of two specimens of Rhabdometra cylindrica. 


The vight-hand figure shows the existence of an unsegmented neck rare 
in the species. 


however, that the individuals of the various species examined by 
my predecessors were not so fully mature as those which I have 
myself been able to study. The greatest length of the hinder 
proglottids is to be found, as it would appear, in Lhabdometra 
nigropunctata, where, according to Crety*, they are three times 
the length of their diameter. That is considerably less than I have 


* Boll. Mus. Torino, v. 1890, No. 88. It should also be noted that this species, 
which measures 140 mm., is nearest in length to mine. 
58* 


862 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


met with. The anterior relatively broader segments are rather 
flattened in transverse section. The posterior proglottids are 
sometimes quite cylindrical in form, being circular in section. Or 
they may be more oval, though still of great depth dorso- 
ventrally. 

In transverse sections such as are represented in text-fig. 6, 
the cortical layer is seen to be fully as thick as, and occasionally 
even a shade thicker than, the medulla. The distribution of the 
longitudinal muscular layer seems to be very much as it has been 
described by Fuhrmann* for the allied species i. numida. Next 
to the transverse muscles there is a layer of rather widely spaced 
bundles with not more and sometimes less than 5 or 6 fibres in 
each. Between these and the subcuticular layer are numerous 
scattered longitudinal fibres implanted singly. The transverse 
fibres form a rather thick layer, and in the anterior region of the 
proglottid, where the medulla is free from the testes ete., and in 
the area partially occupied by the paruterine organ, the trans- 
verse fibres encroach further upon the medullary parenchyma, 
which is largely pervaded by them. Dorso-ventral fibres are also 
abundant in the medullary layer and, as mentioned later, are not 
at first displaced by the paruterine organ. 

The water-vascular system consists of the two usual longi- 
tudinal vessels, of which the very much larger ventral vessels are 
united by an equally wide transverse vessel at the posterior end 
of each proglottid. The opening of the longitudinal vessel into 
the transverse vessel is guarded by a valve which prevents the 
reflux of fluid into the longitudinal vessel anteriorly. I could find 
no other branches of the ventral vessel to form a network such as 
appears to exist according to Ransom in habdometra nullicollis. 
The dorsal vessel lies above the ventral and often rather to the 
inside ; it is very small but has relatively thick walls. The 
genital ducts pass between the two vessels and below the nerve- 
eord, which is displaced towards the dorsal side from its usual 
position, where the ducts pass beneath it. It will be noted that 
in the relations of the nerve-cord to the genital ducts the present 
species differs from both kh. nudlicollis and Kh. similis, where 
the genital ducts pass dorsal of the nerve-cord. 

The testes are numerous, and often very closely pressed to- 
gether. ‘They lie on all sides of the ovary and vitelline gland, 
being found laterally and posteriorly as well as anteriorly in the 
segment. In the most mature segments the testes are only plainly 
to be recognised posteriorly in the segment lying behind the 
uterus. Laterally the testes in the ripe but not fully mature 

_proglottids extend as far as the water-vessels on each side. An- 
teriorly the boundary of the area occupied by the testes is some 
way short of the anterior margin of the proglottid. In transverse 
sections of proglottids where the uterus is nearly fully developed, 
the testes are seen to lie dorsally of the uterus, which latter organ 


* Res. Swed. Zool. Exp. Egypt, pt. iii. No. 27, 1909. 


AVIAN CESTODES. 863 


occupies the whole ventral surface of the proglottid. The ex- 
tension of the testes anteriorly in the segment seems to be 
prevented by the paruterine organ, which in those proglottids 
where the testes are fully ripe extends backwards for about half 
the length of the proglottid and takes up the greater part of the 
available space. It is important to insist upon the fact that 
the testes surround the female gonads, since this does not appear 
to be the case with other species of this genus Rhabdometra as 
figured by Ransom. The genus is, in fact, partly defined by the 
existence of the testes only behind and at the sides of the female 
organs. The testes are only two deep in a given segment. 

The cirrus-sac is long and slender, longer than that of the 
species figured by Ransom, but considerably shorter than the 
cirrus-sac of RA. nwmida of Fuhrmann, which reaches to the middle 
of the segment. In segments where the gonads are ripe but in 
which there is as yet no uterus, the cirrus-sac very nearly reaches 
the middle of the segment; but in older and wider segments it 
only just crosses the ventral water-vessel. Its course is obliquely 
forward from the point of opening on to the exterior, which is 
vather behind the middle line of the proglottid. There can 
hardly be said to be a genital cloaca : a funnel-shaped depression 
of the body, into the bottom of which the genital ducts open (the 
male duct anterior to the female), not showing the characters of 
a distinct chamber such as that of, for example, Hugonodeum. 
In horizontal sections the cirrus-sac often has a serpentiform out- 
line, being like an elongated S$. Occasionally it is slightly dilated 
at the internal end, but the cirrus-sac of this Rhabdometra never 
has the bottle-like form of that of many other tapeworms. In 
consequence of its length and slenderness the cirrus is not much 
coiled within it, lying mostly straight or rather in an undulating 
line. I could detect no spines upon the cirrus when protruded. 
I did not observe any autocopulation. The walls of the cirrus- 
sac are thick and very muscular. The internal coat is of cir- 
cularly running fibres, the outer layer fibres run longitudinally. 
From the internal end of the cirrus a retractor muscle runs for 
some way into the medullary tissue. This character is also found 
in other species of the genus Rhabdometra. The vas deferens 
forms a large coil which is situated posteriorly to the paruterine 
organ, and extends backward in the pvoglottid to as far as the 
receptaculum seminis. At about this point the efferent tubules 
from the testes meet it. There is no vesicula seminalis. 

The ovary lies at about the middle of the segment. It is in 
front of and larger than the vitelline gland: 

The vagina is long and thick-walled, and outside of the mus- 
cular walls is a layer of stalked glands which are deeply stained 
by hematoxylin. The course of the vagina is directed parallel to 
and slightly away from the cirrus-sac to begin with; it then 
curves more backwards to open into the receptaculum seminis. 
Its course is apt to be rather undulating. Ransom has figured a 
sudden change in the character of the vagina in the species 


864 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


described by himself, occurring at some distance from the open- 
ing into the receptaculum. It here becomes much narrower. 
Nothing of the kind oceurs in Rhabdometra cylindrica, except, 
perhaps, just at the orifice ; and, moreover, the coating of gland- 
cells extends over the entire vagina, up to the receptaculum. 
The latter is large and spherical to rather oval in form; it lies 
obliquely to the longitudinal axis of the body towards the pore 
side. 
§ The Paruterine Organ. 


This structure is of such importance in the group of tapeworms 
of which the present species is a member, that it needs a detailed 
treatment for comparative purposes. In the living worm the 
paruterine organ is exceedingly conspicuous as a rod-like body 
at the anterior end of the proglottid, often of a brilliant white, 
thus contrasting with the more pellucid tissues of the outer layers 
of the worm. This aspect led me at first to regard the paruterine 
organ as the uterus crammed with eggs, which might be expected 
to show a bright white owing to the innumerable separate and 
minute embryos. In the proglottids the increasing length of 
the paruterine organ could readily be observed owing to its ex- 
treme conspicuousness. It was so distinct from the rest of 
the proglottid in its neighbourhood, that each paruterine organ 
suggested a conical peg attaching two consecutive segments. In 
the living worms the paruterine organ is a perfectly rod-like 
structure, without any obvious twist of any kind. It was seen to 
diminish slightly in width at its terminal end, and was never 
seen to extend to the posterior end, though the organ appeared to 
commence at the very beginning of the proglottid. The whole 
appearance of the organ as seen with a lens, suggests that it is 
produced by a growth from before backwards, and not vice versa. 

In alcohol-preseryed examples the paruterine organ is no longer 
visible in the intact worm, nor is it in specimens examined 
whole after clearing but without staining. This seems to suggest 
that the bright white appearance of the paruterine organ in 
the living worm is caused by air-spaces in the spongy tissue of 
which the organ is composed. But it must be admitted that this 
of itself is difficult to understand. Still, the organ certainly has 
the appearance during life of being composed of a fine froth. 
I have examined the organ in the preserved worms by means of 
transverse and longitudinal sections. I have already spoken of 
the organ when fully developed as being rod-like, or perhaps 
rather style-like, as it diminishes to one end. But in trans- 
verse sections it is seen that the paruterine organ is only 
rod-like, and thus circular in section, in the fully mature pro- 
glottids. These proglottids are themselves tubular and oval, 
or even quite circular in transverse section. In more anterior 
segments the form of the proglottid is more flattened, and the 
paruterine organ shares in this alteration of form. In such 
proglottids the organ is more flattened and tends to have the 


AVIAN CESTODES. 865 


shape, in transverse sections, of a parallelogram with rounded 
angles. The most important point in the development of this 
organ is that it is wholly unconnected with the uterus. The 
paruterine organ is found in proglottids where there is as yet no 
trace of a uter us. 

There can, therefore, be no comparison with the paruterine organ 
of such a form as Avitellina, ‘‘ where the uterine wall cells... . 
supply the origin of the egg-pouches or paruterine organ” *, With 
reference to species of Ahabdometra, the statements of Ransom 
are not definite. In the case of Rh. nullicollis, that author writes t 
that ‘the parenchyma in front of the uterus becomes dense and 
fibrous and develops into a prominent paruterine organ, which 
behind is in immediate relation with the anterior end of the 
uterus.” Of the paruterine organ of 7h. similis = he writes no 
more positively. We may infer from Mr. Ransom’s descriptions 
that the paruterine organ does not appear before the uterus and 
that it may be an outgrowth of its anterior wall. In this case 
there is an important difference from the species described in the 
present paper, and in any case there is a difference in time of 
appearance. 

The earliest appearance of the paruterine organ under a high 
magnification is shown in text-fig. 3. It consists mainly in an 
apparent multiplication of the nuclei of the medullary parenchyma. 
In any case they are more closely aggregated for a short region 
in the middle of the anterior half of the proglottid. This dense 
mass of nuclei—that is dense comparatively speaking—reaches 
forward to the anterior border of the proglottid. But it must be 
borne in mind that the actual delimitation of successive proglottids 
cannot be fixed unless the wall of the transverse water-vascular 
tube fixes it. In this case the paruterine organ does not reach 
the anterior limit of the proglottid in which it les. In more 
mature proglottids, however, the anterior margin of the par- 
uterine organ is so straight a line that one cannot help thinking 
that this may be the anterior margin of the proglottid, im which 
case the posterior wall of the transverse water-vessel lies within 
the segment in front. 

I have no evidence whether the great multiplication of the 
numbers of the nuclei to form the beginnings of the paruterine 
organ is due to an actual multiplication, or to a crowding together 
by simultaneous migration inwards from other quarters. The 
nuclei of the future paruterine body show no difference from the 
surrounding nuclei of the medullary parenchyma. I have said 
that the multiplication of the nucleiis the main feature of the 
paruterine organ on its first appearance. The only other 
difference from the surrounding parenchyma is a slight opacity, 
which is, I am convinced, simply due to the crowding of the 
nuclei. The network structure of the medullary parenchyma is 
not at first at all altered in the future meme organ. The 


* Gough, Q. J. Mier. Sci. lvi. p. 375, 1911. { Loe. cit. p. 34. 
+ Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. No. 69, p. 29, 1909. 


866 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


area occupied by the growing paruterine organ at this stage is 
rather more than a quarter and Jess than a third of the length of 
the proglottid. It is interesting to note that these small 
dimensions apply to the completely formed paruterine organ of 


Rhabdometra nullicollis *. 


Text-figure 3. 


ya 


Portion of an anterior sezment of Rhabdometra cylindrica in horizontal 
section, to show origin of paruterime body. 


7. Longitudinal muscles. par. Paruterine organ. ¢. Testes. ¢.v. Transverse 
water-vascular vessel. 


Text-fig. 4 illustrates a portion of a transverse section of a 
proglottid with a paruterine organ at a more advanced stage of 
development than that represented in the last figure. The 
paruterine organ is distinctly marked off from the surrounding 


* Ransom, loc. cit. p. 30, fig. 22. 


AVIAN CESTODES. 867 


medullary parenchyma in the middle of which it lies. But 
although it is definitely marked off, it has not an outer layer of 
circular muscles, such as will be described presently in the 
completely adult paruterine organ. ‘The principal distinction 
which the paruterine organ shows in comparison with the 


Text-figure 4. 


Portion of a transverse section of a young proglottid ot Rhabdometra cylindrica. 
The greater part of the medullary region is occupied by the paruterine organ. 


e Calcareous corpuscles in the paruterine organ. d.v. Dorso-ventral 
muscular fibres. ¢. Transverse muscular fibres. 


surrounding medullary region is the much denser character of the 
parenchyma, which no longer presents the appearance of a delicate 
network with clearer circular or oval interspaces. The network 
is here and there quite visible in parts, the whole tissue being much 


868 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


more deeply stained. I take this to be due to a solidification of 
the tissue by the disposition of matter in the interstices of the 
orginally existing network, which is more responsive to staining 
by logwood. The nuclei are more abundant than in the sur- 
rounding medullary parenchyma. But they are in the same way 


Text-figure 5. 


Horizontal section through not fully ripe proglottid of Rhabdometra cylindrica. 


par. Paruterine organ. wé. Uterus appearing as numerous partly detached 
cavities. v.d. Vas deferens. w.v. Transverse water-vascular vessel. 


of two kinds—larger and clearer nuclei which appear to be 
myoblasts, and smaller nuclei which belong to the connective- 
tissue network. A peculiar feature m the structure of the 
paruterine organ at this stage, and one which is a further proof 
of the view that it is a modified region of the medullary 


AVIAN CESLODES. 869 


parenchyma and not an outgrowth of the generative system, is 
the existence of dorso-ventral muscle-fibres: these are not 
elements belonging to the paruterine organ and restricted to it, 
but, as is shown in the text-figure referred to, they arise outside of 
and perforate it. They pass into the paruterine organ at exactly 
right angles to the transverse diameter of the proglottid. A 
final characteristic of the paruterine organ at this stage is the 


Text-figure 6. 


Ey 


avvtWWicchiavee 
awe Be 


Cy ; 4 le oN 


a 


eS 


% 
i 


fy, : 
; Pym ey aii x 


Wile 


Transverse section through fully mature proglottid of Rhabdometra cylindrica. 


par. Paruterine organ. w.v. Ventral water-vascular vessel. 


larger number of calcareous bodies which lie within it and which 
are most numerous where it abuts upon the uterus posteriorly. 
Ransom has remarked upon the same feature in the paruterine 
organ of Sphyroncotenia. The shape of the paruterine organ at 
this stage as seen in horizontal sections is shown in text-fig. 5. 

In the longest, and therefore presumably ripest, proglottids the 
paruterine organ differs in some few particulars from its younger 


870 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


stages. In transverse sections, as is shown in text-fig. 6, the 
organ appears to be quite circular, and it lies exactly in the middle 
of the proglottid. It has sometimes a perfectly conical form 
tapering towards and at the end which touches, indeed protrudes 


Text-figure 7. 


Sagittal section through fully mature proglottid of Rhabdometra cylindrica. 


par. Paruterine organ. ¢. Testes. wt. Uterus. w.v. Transverse 
water-vascular vessel. 


AVIAN CESTODES. “871 


into, the uterus. In other cases the diameter of the paruterine 
organ fluctuates from point to point, thus showing a less regular 
form such as is depicted in longitudinal section in text-fig. 7. 
This difference of form is probably to be explained by uneven 
contraction of the worm’s body or the muscular wall of the 
paruterine organ during preservation. The paruterine organ is 
long, but not quite so long as the uterus at which it ends. It 
therefore occupies rather less than half of the length of the 
proglottid. Dorso-ventrally the paruterine organ touches the 
limits of the medullary region of the proglottid; but laterally it 
does not fill up that space entirely, leaving some of the original 
medullary parenchyma visible right and left. There is no 
question of the inclusion of any organs in the paruterine organ 
such as I describe later* in what appears to be the equivalent of 
a paruterine organ in the Davaineid genus Otiditenia. The 
completely formed paruterine organ of this species of Rhabdometra 
is sharply marked off from the surrounding tissues by a layer of 
muscles disposed in circular fashion. 

The existence of such an outer muscular wall to the paruterine 
organ has been noted by other observers. I believe this layer to 
be adventitious and for the following reasons. In the younger 
stage just described there is no muscular wall at all; but the 
innermost of the transverse musculay fibres tend to follow the 
outline of the oval paruterine organ, though they hardly can be 
said to adhere toit. The contraction, or at least the alteration, of 
the form of the paruterine organ into a circle in transverse section 
would tend to further a close relationship between itself and the 
immediately surrounding musculature. In any case such a 
relationship exists. The shape in section and the general form 
of the paruterine organ together with its muscular coat are not, 
however, the only points in which the adult organ differs from 
the less perfected stages. The tissue which fills it is apt to have 
a concentric lamellar arrangement shown in text-fig. 8; this 
is also visible in sagittal sections but is not shown in text-fig. 7, 
since the latter is not of a sufficiently highly magnified preparation. 
It is shown, however, in text-fig. 6. 

In the younger proglottids (text-fig. 5) the paruterine organ 
ends up in close contact with the uterus, as has been already 
mentioned. It ends, however, in a definite border which is a 
straight line. In the completely developed paruterine organ 
there appears to be an absolute continuity, and the connective- 
tissue core of the paruterine organ melts away, as it were, in the 
cavity of the uterus. It appeared to me that the caleareous 
corpuscles, which are apt to be specially abundant on the paru- 
terine organ at its distal end though found throughout it, are 
both smaller in many cases and generally less abundant in the 
older paruterine organ, It looks as if they were used up perhaps 
by the growing embryos. Furthermore, the “ perforating ” dorso- 


* P. 880. 


872 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


ventral muscles, to which I have referred inthe younger paruterine 
organ, are in places, but by no means always, visible in the adult, 
as may be seen by a comparison of the figures given. They are 
perhaps broken by the swelling of the organ to a circular form in 
section, for I have seen short fibres imbedded in the connective- 
tissue core. 


Text-figure 8. 
Oo Vv. 


> 


eg So) ,e 


Ss 
er 
a | 
i= re] 
$e See 
oe 
Cd ees 
@ 


co. 
More highly magnified view of a portion of the paruterine organ in sagittal 
section. 


co. Tissue of paruterine organ with calcareous bodies. ov. Ripe eggs contained 
in a space within the paruterine organ. ¢7. Transverse muscles. 


In describing the paruterine organ of Chapmania tapika, Prof. 
Fuhrmann* remarks that in that and all*forms with a paruterine 
organ the ripe eggs do not pass into the paruterine organ until 
the proglottids are detached and thus ready to leave the body. 
Mr. Ransom? particularly remarks that in his examples of the 
genus Sphyroncotenia the mature segments showed no eggs 
within the paruterine organ and that the mode of their trans- 
ference was thus unknown to him. This state of affairs is nearly 
true also of the Rhabdometra which forms the subject of the 
present communication, but not quite. In one ripe proglottid 
among many which I studied, I found embryos within the 


* Res. Swed. Zool. Exp. Egypt, pt. iti. No. 27, p. 19, 1909. 
+ Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. vol xl. p. 637, 1911. 


AVIAN CESTODES. 873 


paruterine organ, thus incidentally proving that the organ is a 
paruterine organ, if any doubt could be supposed to attach to 
that identification of it. The embryos were not directly imbedded 
in the lax tissue of the paruterine organ but were accompanied 
by a cavity within which they lay. Whether this means that 
their assumption into the paruterine organ resulted in the for- 
mation of a cavity by stretching or other means, or whether a 
portion of the uterus was detached as a whole and engulfed by 
the paruterine organ, I do not know. 


$ The Uterus. 


Although the appearance of the paruterine organ before the 
uterus is developed proves that the former is not a product of the 
latter, it does not follow that there is no connection at all between 
these two organs in their origin. I believe that I have been able 
to establish a connection between the two, and that the tissue of 
the paruterine organ gives rise to the uterus. I am not sure 
that 1 have detected the uterus in the very first segment in 
which it is developed, but if not, | am not more than three or 
possibly four segments out. As is often the case with tapeworms, 
the uterus appears rather suddenly and in an advanced stage of 
development, at least speaking relatively. Im the segment in 
question, which is the second or third with a uterus, the testes 
are still active and the ovary and vitelline glands in full maturity 
and not beginning to degenerate. The paruterine organ is 
considerably younger than that represented in text-fig. 5; in the 
sections (which were nearly accurately horizontal) the outline of 
the paruterine organ was nearly square, the breadth being a little 
greater than the length. The uterus consists of an irregular tube 
running rather obliquely across the long axis of the body. The 
tube branches somewhat and there are indications of anastomoses ; 
but the retiform stage of the uterus has hardly been reached. 
The uterus does not extend, as it does later, in front of the 
transversely running coil of the vas deferens. It does not. 
therefore, come into contact with the broad posterior end of the 
paruterine organ as it does in later stages (cf. text-fig. 5). There 
is, however, a connection between the two which is more than 
mere juxtaposition and is, therefore, of an interesting nature. 
A process extends backwards from that posterior corner of the 
paruterine organ which is furthest away from the pore side of the 
segment. It consists, like the paruterine organ at this stage, of 
little more than an agglomeration of nuclei. This process 
extends backwards until it reaches the uterus with whose walls 
it is continuous. 

In an earlier stage, about three segments in front of that just 
described, a uterus can hardly be said to exist. I detected, 
however, a thread of paruterine tissue extending towards the 
same side of the body ; this came into close relations with one or 
two spaces containing ripe ova situated in front of the uterus, 


874 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


and perhaps to be looked upon as the first appearance of a uterus. 
I figure also (text-fig. 9) from a segment which is the one in 


Text-figure 9. 


Upper figures represent two horizontal sections through immature proglottids 
of Rhabdometra cylindrica. 


Lower figure a more highly magnified view of the connection between the 
paruterine organ (par.) and the uterus (wt.). 


a. Process of paruterine organ connecting it with uterus. d. Dorsal vessel. 
w.v. Transverse water-vascular vessel. ¢. Testes. 


AVIAN CESTODES. 875 


front of that first of all treated of in the present account of the 
development of the uterus of Rhabdometra. Here the connection 
of the paruterine organ with the uterus happens to be plainly 
visible in one seouion. and, therefore, to be more striking and 
less liable to doubt than when it has to be followed out from 
section to section. Furthermore, in subsequent sections, where 
the uterus is more advanced and lies also in front of the vas 
deferens, the tissue of the paruterine organ is seen to pass 
continuously into that of the uterus, and the nuclei of the walls 
of both appear to be identical. 

These facts—that is to say if it be agreed that they prove a 
connection between the paruterine organ and the uterus—enable 
us to get over certain morphological difficulties relating to the 
homologies of the uterus and paruterine organs of some other 
Tapeworms. 

In describing the structure of Znermicapsifer capensis* I had 
to refer to an important difference in the uterus of this form as 
compared with other species referred by v. Janickif to that 
genus (his own). Briefly put, the difference is this: in J. capensis 
there was no continuous uterus, but only a series of detached 
cavities which appeared to be formed independently in the 
medullary parenchyma. These cavities were formed subsequently 
to the extrusion of the ova from the ovary and their scattering 
through the parenchyma of the medulla. Furthermore, there 
was also to be observed, and again unconnected with the ova at 
first, a condensation of the medullary nuclei to form a kind of 
network pervading the medulla. This network was often to be 
observed in re‘ation to the ova £. 

Out of this dense tissue, which ultimately surrounds the ova, is 
formed the series of paruterine organs which characterise this, as 
well as a few other genera of tapeworms (Davainea, Thysanotenia). 
T held that the network of parenchymal tissue, out of which the 
paruterine organs were formed, and the cavities in which lay the 
egos singly or in groups, were not the equivalents of the branched 
uterus described by v. Janicki in an allied form, /nermicapsifer 
hyracis (which I removed to the genus Zschokkeella), because, if it 
were, it would be a subsequent stage due to the obliteration of the 
pre-existing cavity; and as the ova appeared in it later it could not 
be a subsequent stage. I believe that the matter becomes clear 
through the-observations which I have recorded in the present 
paper. . We have in RLhabdometra, as in Inermicapsifer, a conden- 
sation of nuclei to form structures or cavities to contain the eggs. 
In Rhabdometra there is one extensive condensation of the kind 
to form the paruterine organ and a delicate strand which extends 
through part of the rest of the medullary parenchyma and would 
appear to be the seat of the formation of the uterus. In my 
species of Znermicapsifer there is the same condensation of the 

* P.Z.S. 1912, p. 588, etc. 


+ Jen. Denkschr. xvi. 1910. 
t Beddard, loc. cit. text-fig. 67, p. 583. 


Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. LIX. 09 


876 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


medullary parenchyma, but it does not become much hollowed 
out to form a uterus or specially condensed in one part to form a 
single paruterine organ. 

On the contrary, it is condensed here and there to form several 
paruterine organs. In Inermicapsifer hyracis of v. Janicki, a 
hollowing out of the strands of condensed tissue occurs before the 
further condensation of the medullary tissue to form the numerous 
paruterine organs. I am of opinion that all these rather various 


Text-figure 10. 


Transverse section through mature proglottid of Rhabdometra cylindrica. 


ut. Uterus. w.v. Lateral water-vascular tubes. 


eases are upon one common ground plan, which does away with 
the at first apparent differences of importance between such 
closely allied forms as Jnermicapsifer capensis and Zschokkeella 
hyracis; and also relegates to the same category other forms in 
which there is buta single paruterine organ. If these suggestions 
thus briefly sketched out be not accepted, there still remain the 


AVIAN CESTODES. 877 


facts which I have described above in connection with the 
formation of the uterus in Lhabdometra cylindrica. I have 
mentioned that the uterus soon after its formation is distinctly 
retiform, the network being irregular but very plainly to be seen 
in horizontal sections. In transverse sections, the uterus is 
seen to lie ventrally and to consist of variously sized cavities 
detached from each other, which is, of course, the expression of 
the horizontal network when seen in that aspect. In more 
mature proglottids the retiform condition is not so clear and the 
uterus occupies much more of the proglottid. The arms of the 
network seem to have coalesced, forming an irregularly shaped 
body with partial septa dividing its interior into partly detached 
cavities, and with outgrowths producing a general irregularity of 
surface. In the completely mature proglottids the appearance 
of the uterus has again changed owing to further development. 
Text-fig. 10 shows a transverse section of such a proglottid, and 
the contained uterus is seen to be circular in section and thus to be 
rod-like in form. Posteriorly the uterus is divided by a median 
septum into two equisized halves, but further forward the uterus 
is obviously single, but the interior is divided by many ingrowing 
strands of the medullary tissue into a series of chambers each of 
which is seen to lodge butasingle embryo. The posterior division 
of the uterus into two reminds us of the uterus of Rhabdometra 
mgropunctata as figured by Crety* ; it is possible, however, that the 
latter form is rather to be referred to the genus Metroliasthes, in 
which the uterus is an entirely double structure. The series of 
changes in the appearance of the uterus in this species of 
Rhabdometra is very remarkable, and seems to contrast with what 
has been observed in the other species of the genus. It is 
further to be noted that we have here, as a temporary phase, a 
form of uterus which is now characteristic of one genus of 
Tapeworms and now of another. 


From the above account we can abstract the following de- 
seription of the species :— 


Rhabdometra cylindrica, sp. n. 


Length 150 mm.; greatest diameter 1:2 mm. Scolew of less 
diameter than strobila following, suckers proportionately very large ; 
rostellum and hooks absent. Neck absent; posterior segments 
elongated, five times their diameter, cylindrical in form. Genital 
apertures alternate regularly, behind middle of proglottid. Genital 
ducts pass between water-vessels and ventral of nerve-cord. Cortical 
layer thick ; longitudinal muscles not in strong bundles ; mostly 
implanted singly, but a row neat to transverse layer of widely 
spaced bundles with from two to five or six fibres. Circular layer 


* Boll. Mus. Torino, 1890. In Crety’s figure the two posterior and globular 
diverticula of an anterior curved portion are alone represented as containing eggs: 
I assume, therefore, that the anterior part is all of it to be regarded as a paruterine 
organ, 

59* 


878 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


well marked and also occupying, in the form of scattered fibres, most 
of the medullary layer in the region of the paruterine organ. Dorsal 
water-vessel very small, lying dorsal of large ventral vessel, which 
communicates with its fellow posteriorly in each segment by a single 
transverse vessel; no excretory network. Testes surround ovary and 
vitelline gland. Cirrus-sae with a strong muscular wall, and with 
special retractor muscles posteriorly, long and narrow, extending a 
little beyond water-vascular tubes; cirrus without spines ; vas 
deferens with a large and close coil but without vesicula senvinalis. 
Cirrus-sac opens into a cloaca genitalis. Vagina opens behind 
cirrus-sac, terminal region wide and muscular. Uterus at first 
retiform, then irregular in shape with outgrowths, later tubular 
and divided into two chambers by a median septum posteriorly : 
the embryos also separated by ingrowths of walls of uterus. 
Paruterine organ long and styliform, commencing at anterior end 
of proglottid, nearly circular in transverse section when mature, 
appears before uterus. 
Hab. Caccabis melanocephala. 


§ Systematic Position. 


It is clear that a member of the Teenioidea with a totally 
unarmed scolex, with one set of genitalia in each proglottid, and 
with a single paruterine organ, can only belong to one of the 
three genera Rhabdometra, Anonchotenia, or Metroliasthes, or to 
a new genus allied to them. 

As it is, these three genera are very near together ; the generic 
differences as set forth by Ransom mainly concern the position 
of the genital ducts with reference to the water-vessels and the 
form of the uterus. In both of these particulars the present 
species is like Rhabdometra ; sufficiently so also, in other features, 
to warrant its inclusion in that genus. ‘There are, however, 
differences which prevent the reference of my species to any of 
those which have been already described. In none of the 
hitherto described species are the segments so long as in the 
present form. Rhabdometra nigropunctata has the longest of 
any ; but here the most posterior are only 3 x 1. 

There is, to my mind, no doubt that the species which is 
nearest akin to that which I here name Rhabdometra cylindrica 
is Fuhrmann’s recently described Rh. nwmida*, and it will be 
observed that both come from the same part of the world and 
they both infest gallinaceous birds. There are, however, 
sufficient differences to warrant specific separation. Thus, 
Rh. numida is a small species 60-70 mm., and has not, as 
already mentioned, elongated posterior proglottids. Although 
the two species agree in possessing a long cirrus-sac, that 
of Rh. numida is much the longer, reaching as it does to the 
middle of the body. Nothing is said as to the development of 


* Res. Swed. Zool. Exp. Egypt, Pt. ii. 27, p. 36, 1909. 


AVIAN CESTODES. 879 


the uterus; but it is, when fully matured, a lobate sac, and 
apparently not strictly cylindrical, as in my species. On the 
other hand, the paruterine organ is represented as appearing first, 
and the course of the vas deferens is as in my species and not as 
in some others. Further, the genital apertures of Rh. numida 
are behind the middle line of the proglottid, and the testes come 
nearer to surrounding the ovary than in other species, except 
Rh. cylindrica. Finally, the generative ducts lie between the 
water-vessels and ventral to the nerve-cord. I have observed 
the same relationship in 2h. cylindrica. 

It is possible, of course, that previous authors have not seen 
quite fully-developed examples of the species studied by them. 
In view, however, of the published figures of the uterus and 
paruterine organ in the several species, | am inclined to doubt 
this. For example, Ransom’s figure of that organ in Rh. similis* 
shows the “ flowing appearance” of the core of the paruterine, 
which I find only in that organ when fully developed (see 
text-fig. 8, p. 872). As to other species, it does not appear 
that the reticular uterus of Rhabdometra cylindrica, a condition 
which precedes its cylindrical final form, has any likeness to 
what has been observed in previously described forms. This, 
indeed, coupled with the form of the paruterine organ and a 
number of minor points, such as the posterior position of the 
generative apertures, the position of the coil of the vas deferens, 
and the distribution of the testes, seem perhaps after all to 
necessitate generic separation. But this I leave for the present. 
It must be remembered, however, that the scolex of this species 
of Ransom is unknown, and that apart from this character it 
is hard to distinguish habdometra from Paruterina. 


§ A Note upon Otiditenia eupodotidis Leddard. 


After communicating to the Society f my note upon this new 
tapeworm from Haupodotis kori, it was suggested to me that it 
was possibly identical with or near to a recently described new 
genus and species Sphyroncotenia uncinata. I had not at that 
time seen Mr. Ransom’s paper =, which only (through his kindness) 
reached my hands after my memoir was in the press. I was, 
therefore, unable to make any comparisons. A consideration of 
the structure of this genus Sphyroncotenia, leads me to revise 
what I have written concerning the affinities of Oliditenia ; but 
the two genera are not identical. In Sphyroncotenia the body 
is much more elongate than in Otiditenia; the genital pores are 
unilateral; there are many rows of minute hooks upon the 
rostellum, and the uterus appears to be racemose and to extend 


* Loc. cit. p. 35, fig. 26. 

+ P. Z.S. 1912, p. 194. 

+ Ransom, “A New Cestode from an African Bustard,” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 
bra a DN 7s Yeu coo 


880 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


much further into the ripe proglottid than it does in Otiditenia. 
I have re-examined my preparations of Otiditenia, and find that 
my report upon its structure as regards the above points in which 
it differs from Sphyroncotenia is correct as to fact. 

But I find that I have missed one point of resemblance to 
Sphyroncotenia, and through it, to the subfamily Idiogenine 
of the Davaineide, This has, of course, an important bearing 
upon the classification and position of Otiditenia in the system. 
While admitting its resemblances to Davainea, and by inference 
to the Davaineide, I was inclined to place Otiditenia nearer to 
Choanotenia and its allies. This was, undoubtedly, due to my 
not having seen a paruterine organ, though its presumed 
absence was not made use of in the generic definition *, or in the 
résumé of the most noteworthy characters of the genus following 
the definition. Nor, indeed, do the nearly mature proglottids 
show any structure exactly resembling the paruterine organ of 
Idiogenes, Stilesia, Anonchotenia, Sphyroncotenia, Rhabdometra, 
and other forms as figured by various zoologists im memoirs 
known to me. In all of these instances, and in others, the 
paruterine organ is represented as a structure of fibrous appear- 
ance and of limited size, formed apparently from a metamorphosis 
of the medullary ground-tissue in the immediate neighbourhood 
of the uterus or from the walls of the uterus itself. This latter 
origin is asserted by Gough t for Avitellina centripunctata, while 
Ransom’s figure t of a “‘ mature segment becoming gravid” of 
Rhabdometra similis may be interpreted ina like manner. But 
whatever be the origin of these paruterine organs §—and both 
Fuhrmann and Gough believe them to be not strictly homologous 
through the series—they would appear to have been described as 
small bodies lying in, and possibly derived from, but ultimately 
independent of, the medullary parenchyma. 

In Otiditenia, however, the more mature segments show an 
alteration in the medullary parenchyma to which J have referred, 
and which I have figured in my memoir upon that genus || 
This alteration affects the whole of the medullary parenchyma as 
seen in that section 4] of a nearly mature proglottid. It is visible 
up to the circular muscular layer which forms the line of 
demarcation between the cortex and the medulla, except where 
it is separated therefrom by the ventral water-vascular tube as is 
also shown in my figure. The dorsal smaller water-vascular vessel 
lies well within the core of medullary parenchyma, as is also 
shown in the figure referred to. There is not, therefore, to be 


* Loc. cit. p. 220. 

+ “A Monograph of the Tape-Worms of the Subfamily Avitellining.” Quart. 
Journ. Micr. Sci. lvi. pt. 2, 1911, p. 375. 

+ “The Teenioid Cestodes of N. American Dirds.” Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. No. 69, 
1909, fig. 23, p. 31. 
§ I do not refer here to the multiple paruterine organs of Davainea, Zschokkeella, 
etc. 

\| Loe. cit. p. 218, text-figs. 23, 24, 26, 29. 

§| Loe. cit. fig. 29, p. 212) 


ae ae 


AVIAN CESTODES. 881 


observed the formation out of the medullary parenchyma of a 
definite structure that can be called a separate organ, since the 
modified region of the proglottid extends over the whole medullary 
parenchyma and includes the dorsal vascular tube. 

J have also figured in my paper referred to stages which are 
anterior to that which has just been redescribed. In text-fig. 26 
of the paper referred to*, three proglottids somewhat younger 
are represented in sagittal section. A glance at this figure 
might convey the suggestion that a definite paruterine organ of 
limited extent lay in each of these proglottids, narrower at one 
end (where the letter “'l’” in the diagram is placed) and wider at 
the other. Furthermore, the slightly twisted outline of the 
(alleged) paruterine organ recalls that of, for example, Rhabdo- 
metra nullicollis t. A more careful scrutiny of these sections, 
however, brings to light the following faets which are of importance 
in the matter. Although, as depicted in my illustration, the edge 
of the (alleged) paruterine organ is apt to be wavy and thus to 
create inequalities in its diameter, suggestive of a solid body of 
irregularly curved outline, it will be found that the waviness is 
closely followed by the layer of transverse musculature which 
separates, in this as in other tapeworms, the cortical and medullary 
layers. Unequal contraction during preservation is, as I think, 
responsible for this undulating disposition of the line of transverse 
muscular fibres. The object, however, of my figures referred to 
was not to show the structure of the medullary parenchyma but 
to indicate the position and relations of the uterus. ‘The minute 
structure of the medullary region in this stage is less modified 
than that of the older proglottids already referred to. The 
medullary groundwork is traversed by numerous rather stout 
muscular fibres, running mainly if not entirely in a dorso-ventral 
direction. These are very frequent, but are single and not 
ageregated into bundles excepting at the anterior end of the 
proglottid; here the testes of this segment in front are separated 
by a thicker layer of these muscles from the parenchyma of the 
ensuing segment, the groundwork is comparatively dense, and 
there are abundant nuclei. I have recognised that in those pro- 
glottids, as well as in the more mature ones, the dorsal water- 
vessels are included in the medullary tissue. In comparing this 
stage with the older one that has just been described, it appears 
that the latter differs only in the degeneration of the mus- 
cular fibres of the ground-tissue, which produces the more 
fibrous and, at the same time, laxer appearance of the medullary 
parenchyma, which, however, may be more resistant, and which 
is still further exaggerated in the distended perfectly ripe and 
detachable proglottids at the end of the worm’s body. This laxity 
favours the movement into the interior of the embryos from 
the uterus, which I have described in my paper as occurring in 


* P. 204. 
+ Ransom, Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. No. 69, p. 29, fig. -21, 1909. 


882 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


these proglottids. It should, furthermore, be noticed that while 
the medullary tissue is, as already stated, separated anteriorly 
from the testes, there is no such separation posteriorly where it 
abuts upon the uterus, nor is the epithelial lining of the latter 
apparent in these older ‘proglottids ; thus the transference of the 
eggs into the medullary parenchyma is render ed easier. Finally, 
I have observed that the calcareous corpuscles tend to accumulate 
more thickly where the medullary parenchyma touches the uterus, 
though they are also present elsewhere and in some numbers 
here and there. 

To compare with the above older stages in the growth of the 
sheltering apparatus for, the developing embryos, I have again 
studied younger stages such as is represented in text-fig. 25 of 
my paper referred to*, I have, however, more especially studied 
sagittal sections, as in the case of the older proglottids. In such 
sections there should be visible the origin of the paruterine body, 
were this structure in the genus Oliditenia of the same nature 
as that of Rhabdometra, etc. But I can find no trace of any 
particular condensation and fibrillation of a definite region of the 
medullary parenchyma which might later spread and involve the 
whole region, which is thus inv olved in mature proglottids, but 
for other reasons. 

Not only is there nothing of this kind to be observed in the 
less mature proglottids, but there is no approach towards 
the fibrous appearance of the mature proglottids. This latter 
appearance is, in fact, produced by a new growth, which seems to 
be very remarkable. I have already referred in my account of 
the proglottids of intermediate age to abundant dorso-ventral 
muscular fibres in the medulla; it is, perhaps, to the unequal 
contraction of these by the pr eser vative reagent that the irregular 
outline of the medullar y parenchyma is due, which I have 
commented upon as simulating a paruterine organ of limited 
extent, lying in the medulla ary parenchyma. I now eall 
attention again, In a more particular way, to these muscle-fibres. 
In his account of tapeworms of the subf: amily Avitellinine (of the 
family Anoplocephalidze), Gough f enters in some detail into the 
histology of Avitellina centripunctata, including that of the 
muscular system, which I may conveniently take as a basis of 
comparison with Otiditenia, which shows an important difference. 
Gough points out that the dorso-ventral muscles which traverse 
the medullary parenchyma in that direction, consist mainly of 
bipolar myoblasts with terminal fibrille and, to a less degree, of 
bipolar myoblasts with lateral fibrille. The larger muscular fibres, 
which are tubiform with an axially contained myoblast, are 
limited to the longitudinal muscular layer. My own observations 
upon various genera which I have examined confirm this 
generalisation. The delicate dorso-ventral muscle-fibres of such 


* Loe. cit. p. 202. 
+ Quart. Journ. Mier. Sci. vol. lvi. 1911, p. 347 et seq. 


AVIAN CESTODES. 883 


tapeworms as I have known hitherto, often curled into a spiral or 
at least an undulating course, ave excessively slender as compared 
with the longitudinal muscles. In Otidiiceenia, however, we meet 
with the very surprising state of affairs represented in the annexed 
figure (text-fig. 11). Imbedded in the nucleated parenchyma 
are numerous scattered muscular fibres, which have a general 


Text-figure 11. 


Sagittal section through a portion of proglottid of Otiditenia ewpodotidis. 


1. Longitudinal, ¢. Transverse, d.v. Dorso-ventral muscles. 
m. Medullary layer. 


dorso-ventral direction and must be regarded as the dorso-ventral 
musculature. But the fibres themselves are distinctly of the 
character of the fibres of the longitudinal muscular layer. They 
are long, straight fibres of even diameter, and I traced them 
through the layer of cireular fibres which bounds the medullary 


884 DR. F, E. BEDDARD ON 


parenchyma externally. These fibres, however, are not exactly 
like those which constitute the longitudinal muscular bundles. 
Although very wide when compared with the delicate fibrils that 
one expects to find in this situation, they are little if anything 
more than half the width of the longitudinal fibres. There is 
also a difference in the way in which they absorb the logwood 
stain, indicating a denser, because more deeply stained, outer 
layer. I do not attempt a further description of these fibres, as 
the material was not preserved in a way likely to bring out greater 
detail of structure. But enough is plainly visible to show that 
the dorso-ventral musculature in this worm is different from 
that usually met with in this situation among tapeworms. It is 
now necessary to point out that, in the younger proglottids, these 
thick dorso-ventral muscles are not visible. As the mode of pre- 
servation and staining has been identical, there can be no question 
here of a failure to detect the fibres in question, which I have 
looked for both in transverse and sagittal sections. Fine delicate 
fibrils can be seen, but nothing like the muscles just described, 
which are even: recognisable under quite low powers. It seems 
clear, therefore, that they appear; but whether they do so in the 
shape of new fibres or of a thickening of more slender fibres 
present in the younger proglottids, | am unable to say. But in 
any case there is a chan ge of structure in the medullary paren- 
ehyma as it grows older which is not a degeneration, and which 
appears, therefore, to be a preparation for some function, which is 
possibly that of a receptacle for the ripe embryos. It is for these 
reasons that I think myself justified in speaking of a paruterine 
organ in Ofiditenia which is, however, of a most generalised 
kind. 

The above description amounts in reality chiefly to an 
emphasised re-assertion of the facts concerning the medullary 
parenchyma of Otiditenia, already dealt with in my paper on 
that genus. The facts lead me to the inference that we have in 
this tapeworm the commencement of the formation of the 
paruterine organ, which is more differentiated in other genera of 
Davaineide, as well as in the Paruterine among the Hymeno- 
lepidide. The paruterine organ of Stilesia, and that of its 
immediate ally Avitellina, seems to me to be a different structure 
altogether, though serving much the same function. In Oétidi- 
tenia, then, there is an alteration of structure in the whole 
medullary layer in the direction of increased firmness; but there 
is no special part of that parenchyma set apart for the shelteri ing 
of the growing embryos. In a sense, therefore, I was right in 
not describing the existence of a paruteri ine organ ; but. with 
equal truth it may be said that this genus has the equivalent of 
a paruterine organ. In this genus we see the next stage to that 
exhibited by many genera in which the ripe embryos lie in the 
unaltered parenchyma, such as Oochoristica, Linstowia, ete. A. 
slight increase of specialisation of the conditions observable in 
Otiditenia leads us at once to such a form as Sphyroncotenia, 


AVIAN CESTODES. 885 


where a large conical paruterine organ exists which is distinct 
from the surrounding medullary parenchyma. 


§ Systematic position of Otiditenia. 


I shall now reconsider the systematic position of Otiditenia in 
the light of the foregoing revision of certain facts in its anatomy. 

As to the hooks which would form so important a means of 
preliminary family identification, I am not yet certain whether 
they are or are not the typical Davaineid hooks. They may well 
be so; but as I have not been able to view them sideways in my 
preparations I am unable to be positive. They may prove to be 
like those of Oligorchis paucitesticulatus * for example. There is, 
however, no doubt that this genus is not in any case a near ally 
of Oligorchis or Hymenolepis, so that we may perhaps fairly 
assume that the hooks after all conform to the idea that Otidi- 
tenia is to be referred to the Davaineide. Of this family 
Mr. Ransom has lately? made a useful table of classification 
which is an extension quite up to the present date of the table 
in his revision of the Cyclophyllidea £. 

From the table in question it appears that Otiditenia will 
come nearest to Chapmania. The matter for immediate 
settlement is, therefore, whether the two genera are to be 
regarded as identical, in which case my name will obviously have 
to be dropped. It must be remembered, however, that this near 
alliance depends upon whether we are to look upon Otiditenia as 
possessing a paruterine organ ; otherwise (still considering it for 
other reasons to be a Davaineid) Otiditenia will be nearer to, or 
identical with, either Davainea or Ophryocotyle. As to Davainea, 
we may at once dismiss the idea of near affinity; for in that 
genus the ripe embryos are included in numerous separate 
paruterine sacs quite unlike the paruterine organs of Idiogenine. 
The knowledge of the genus Ophryocotyle mainly depends upon 
the descriptions of O. insignis of Lonnberg, the most recent 
of which is in a memoir by Fuhrmann §. This worm is to be 
at once distinguished from mine by the immense number of 
hooks, 2000, which are disposed in an undulating line round a 
particularly large rostellum:; furthermore, the uterus, which is 
slightly lobate in form, lies behind the ovary, while the testes 
are dorsal to as well as behind the ovary. Moreover, the uterus 
shows no tendency to break up; it is conceivable, however, that 
it might later, in view of the very late breaking up of the uterus 
in Otiditenia. Finally, Ophryocotyle is to be characterised by 
multiple rows of minute hooks upon a portion of the suckers. 
This latter character does not seem to be found in-Otiditenia. 


bE) 


* Fuhrmann in “‘Nordische Vogel-Cestcden aus dem Museum von Goteborg, 
Medd. Goteborg. Mus. Zool., Afd. i. p. 18, fig. 8. 

+ “ A New Cestode from an African Bustard,” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. xl. 1911, p. 637. 

t Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. No. 69, 1909. 

§ Centralbl. f. Bakt. Paras. Bd. xlix. 1909, p. 94. 


886 DR. F. E, BEDDARD ON 


But in the case of these hooks upon the suckers, it would appear 
that in Chapmania they tend to drop off. This difference, 
therefore, between Otiditenia on the one hand, and_ both 
Ophr yocot yle and Chapmania on the other hand, must be held 
in reserve until more specimens have been examined. There is, 
however, I think, no doubt that Otiditenia is quite distinct from 
Ophryoc atyle, if only by reason of the characteristic rostellam of 
the latter. There now remains only the genus Chapmania. ‘The 
first obvious point of difference between the two supposed genera 
is the armature of the suckers in Chapmania; but, as alveady 
admitted, we cannot apparently dwell too strongly upon this, for 
the reason that these hooks are said to be occasionally shed from 
the suckers in Chapmania. I haye, however, examined the 
suckers in two specimens of Ofiditenia ; and the examination of 
two examples lends naturally further support to the view that 
the hooks are really missing. Apart from this, there are 
apparently two main points of difference which forbid a fusion of 
these genera. In Chapmania tapika—which species alone comes 
into comparison with Otiditenia, for Ch. taurika has unilateral 
generative pores and in other respects differs perhaps to a generic 
extent from its supposed congener—a tentacle arises from each 
sucker; this is figured by Furhmann as elongated and conical. 
I have found nothing of the kind in Jongitudinal and transverse 
sections of the scolex of Otiditenia. It may be urged that this 
failure to discover a similarity may be due to ‘the complete retrac- 
tion of the sucker tentacle, and thus to the difliculty of detecting 
it. This may be so; but in the meantime I have seen, in a 
tapeworm from Vumida (which may perhaps be the very species, 
Chapmania tapika), the tentacle freely moving about in the 
living worm. Having thus recognised the structure, it is of 
course less likely that I should miss it in examples where it was 
ravefully looked for. Besides, the apparent non-retraction of 
this tentacle in the preserved examples of Chapmania examined 
by Fubrmann, leads to the inference that it would be present in 
an unretracted condition in my spirit-preserved specimens of 
Otiditenia, were it a character of that species. The next point of 
difference is the paruterine organ. If we are to regard the 
modified medullary parenchyma in its entirety as the paruterine 
organ in Otiditenia, the corresponding organ of Chapmania 
as figured by Clerc * is distinctly different. 

Neither Fubrmann nor Clere gives much in the way of deserip- 
tion of the organ. Judging from the figure the paruterine organ 
of Chapmania only occupies about half of the ripe proglottid. 
It extends towards the uterus, which occupies about the other 
half, and ends on its side turned towards the uterus in a flat 
surface. ‘This is obviously totally different from the structure 
which I have figured in Otiditenia, and considered to be possibly 
a paruterine organ. On the other hand, the breadth of the 


* Centralbl. f. Bakt. u. Paras. Bd. xlii. 1906, p. 722. 


= eee ee ee ae 


AVIAN CESLODES. 887 


paruterine organ in Chapmania lends some support to a 
comparison ; for it is as wideas the medullary parenchyma, which 
it entirely fills anteriorly, thus contrasting. with the much 
narrower paruterine organ as figured in Jdiogenes. I should also 
add that the supposed paruterine organ of Otiditenia has no 
line of demarcation from the uterus such as is figured by Clere in 
Chapmania. As points of minor importance, the uterus is lobate 
in Chapmania and ends much further forward in the segment 
than it does in Ofiditenia. The ripe and detached proglottid 
figured by Fuhrmann * is apparently not unlike that of 
Otiditenia. But it may be seen that the paruterine organ is 
more or less completely filled with the ripe embryos, whereas 
in Otiditenia as I have mentioned, the ripe embryos are not 
scattered throughout the whole of the supposed paruterine 
organ. 

The testes of Chapmania are described as being dorsal, whereas 
in Otiditenia they are posterior, and no more dorsal than ventral. 
Concerning the muscular system of the genus Chapmania, there 
is a difference of opinion between Fuhrmann and Clere. The latter 
regards it as feebly developed, the former as strong; in the latter 
event Otiditenia agrees with Chapmania. One would like to 
know something of the genera Ascometra and Schistometra of 
Cholodkovsky, which are to me at present merely names, being 
included in a Russian catalogue of parasitic worms’. As these 
genera occur in Bustards they are quite possibly Davaineids. I 
do not attempt to redefine Otiditenia until I learn whether it be 
held by others that the paruterine organ described above is a 
structure referable to that category, and therefore of great 
importance as a generic character among the Davaineide, to 
which family I now distinctly refer Oliditenia. 


* Res. Swed. Zool. Exp. Egypt, Pt. mi. No. 27, p. 22, fig. 16, 1909. 
+ Cf. Zool. Rec. 1912. 


ON THE FEET OF THE CANIDZ AND URSIDA. 913 


49, On the Feet and other External Features of the Canidee 
and? "Ursidese eo ywk. Pocock, FRS2 JPM. Se, 
F.Z.S., Curator of Mammals. 


[Received May 19, 1914: Read June 9, 1914. | 


(Text-figures 1-13.) 


INDEX. 


Page 
The Feet, Rhinaria, and Facial Vibrissee of the Canide ... 913 
ClassiicationsongherCanidserenrereeereeeeeereeeee eect ecses een OT 
MhewMlecirotaiherWinsidcepemsaseocesen eee ne eee ates) O29 
Rhmaningor cheslirsidacwerkee eee teen ee ake | BT 
Glassiicatrontottne) Unsidaewee eee eee eee eee eee 88 


Family CANID &. 


Apart from the feet, the external features dealt with in this 
paper are the rhinaria and the facial vibrisse. 

The feet of the typical Canide are highly specialised, and show 
a close adaptive resemblance to those of the Felidz in the form 
of the plantar pad, the strong curvature of the line of the pads 
of digits two to five, in the backward position of the first digit of 
the fore foot, its absence from the hind foot, the hairiness of the 
area behind the plantar * pads, and the persistence of the single 
carpal pad on the fore feet. In their structural uniformity within 
the families, the feet of the Canidez and Felide show a marked 
contrast to those of the Viverride, Mustelide, Procyonide, and 
Urside. 

In most wild species of Canidz the feet differ only in minor 
points from those of domestic breeds already described +. The 
four principal digits are united by integument up to the base of 
the pads. The webbing thus formed may be wide or narrow, and 
clothed with longer or shorter hairs, according to the species. As 
in other Fissiped Carnivora, the hair grows in tufts between the 
pads of the feet and on the upper side of the webs. It is usually 
thickest and longest on the webs, the underside of the digits 
themselves showing a naked or nearly naked streak. 

The rhinariwm is always large and moist, there being apparently 
very little variation with respect to the extent to which the hair 
of the muzzle encroaches upon it. The upper lip below it is 
always divided by a narrow moist distensible area, which presents 
the form of a mere slit when its hairy margins are approximated 
in the middle line. 

The normal tufts of facial vibrisse are always present, but the 


* T use this term indifferently for the main pad of both fore and hind feet. 

+ P.Z.S. 1914, pp. 478-484. The method adopted in that case of ascertaining 
the extent of the web by cutting the hairs short has been followed in the present 
communication dealing with the feet of the wild species of Canidze and with the 
Urside. The figures represent the paws with the hairs cut and the digits distended. 


914 MR, R. I. POCOCK ON THE FEET 


vibrisse vary in length and number according to the species. 
The interramal tuft is placed nearly in a vertical line with the 
corner of the mouth when closed. As in most Fissiped Carnivores, 
there are two genal tufts, one behind the corner of the mouth, 
nearly in a vertical line beneath the posterior canthus of the eye, 
the other usually much higher up the cheek and farther back. 

The genera of Canide hitherto established and admitted rest 
mainly upon cranial and dental characters. 


Speothos venaticus Lund. 
(Text-fig. 1, A, B.) 


The feet of this rare dog, of which I have only been able to 
see dried skins, were figured by Flower (P. Z.8. 1880, p. 70), who 
dismissed them with a mere reference, and this figure was repro- 
duced by Mivart in his ‘Monograph of the Canide’ (p. xv.) to 
illustrate the structure of the feet characteristic of that family. 
As a matter of fact, the feet differ from those of all other genera 
of the Canide in two very important particulars, namely, the ex- 
tensive basal fusion of the third and fourth digital pads of both 
the front and hind feet, and the approximation of the digital 
pad of the first digit of the fore foot to the inner proximal 
angle of the plantar pad. Moreover, the area between the 
large plantar and the carpal pads of the fore foot 1s somewhat 
scantily hairy, especially externally, where a nearly naked strip 
of integument passes from pad to pad, and the edges of the inter- 
digital integument connecting the second and third and the 
fourth and fifth digits is naked on both the anterior and the 
posterior paws, and the area between the digital and plantar 
pads appears to be sparsely covered with short hairs *. 

From its low position, the first digit, it seems, must reach the 
ground when the animal is standing in the normal position, 
especially if the soil be soft. Coupled with the scantiness of the 
hairy clothing of the area above or behind the plantar pad, this 
suggests that Speothos is more plantigrade than any other existing 
dog; and it may be recorded in this connection that the mother 
of a specimen sent to the Gardens in 1879 (P. Z. 8. 1879, p. 664) 
was killed in a creek and that two of the skins in the British 
Museum are labelled ‘‘ Shot while running along creek.” 

If this dog habitually haunts the borders of streams, its planti- 
grade and scantily hairy feet must be an advantage for progres- 
sion on sandy or muddy banks. It appears to me to be impossible 


* Except for the forward position of the first digit and the fusion of the third and 
fourth digital pads in the fore foot, Flower’s figure does not show these features 
well, and it is noticeable that the third and fourth digital pads on the hind foot are 
represented as separated throughout. The shape of the pads too and the median 
position of the carpal pad throw doubt upon the reliability of the figure. Hence it 
may be that the very marked asymmetry between the second and fifth digits on both 
feet is also exaggerated. But since the figure was taken from a fresh example that 
point may be correct. If so, it is full of interest; but on dried skins I cannot find 
convineing evidence that the second digit is so far in advance of the fifth as Flower’s 
figure indicates. 


Text-figure 1. 


OF THE CANID/ AND URSID#. 915 


ssSS8xiy 
= owt 
SS 


to decide whether the peculiarity of the feet in the matter of the 
low position of the first digit and carpal pad is a secondarily 
acquired adaptation to conditions or whether it is a retained 
primitive character. I incline to the latter opinion, because these 
peculiarities are present in the newly born pups of species of 
dogs with normal feet when adult (text-fig. 1, C)*. 


* In Lund’s original figure of Sp. venaticus (Kongl. Danske Vid. Selsk. xi. 
pl. 61, 1845) the first digit is shown in its correct position, but there is a broad web 
between the remaining four, giving a palmate appearance to the spread paw, which 


is certainly inaccurate so far as the third and fourth digits are concerned. 


B. Right hind foot of same. 


C. Right fore foot of newly-born cub of Canis pallipes, showing the low position of the pollex. 


A. Right fore foot of Speothos venaticus, from dried skin. 


916 MR, RB, I. POCOCK ON THE FEET 


Cuon primevus Hodgs. 
(Text-fig. 2.) 


Apart from Blanford’s brief reference to the feet of this species, 
which he described as having “long hair between the foot-pads,” 
I am not acquainted with any description of them. 

I have only seen the feet of two puppies, about four months 
old. In the relative positions of the carpal and plantar pads and 
the pad of the first digit, the fore foot resembles that of Canis 
anthus tolerably closely, but the carpal pad is longer and more 
prominent. Marked differences are noticeable in connection 


Text-figure 2. 


Wy - 
Mite, Lh 
ae 


¥) 


4 
Par ', 
\\\ ¢ ZEYY) 
S1\ \ yy 
WY L 


NN) 
~s 


SO 


Cuon primevus. 


A. Left fore foot. 
B. Rhinarium from the front. 
C. Side view of face, showing vibrisse and rhinarium. 


with the four main digits. The third and fourth are widely 
separable, the space between them when distended being equal 
to that between the second and third and the fourth and fifth. 
The edge of the web joining them is smooth and not sharply 


differentiated from them by the hairy covering seen in most — 


species of Canide. The edge of the web between the second 
and third and fourth and fifth digits, is not naked and forms a 
tolerably evenly curved line. The greater part of the sole between 
the four digital pads and the broadly cordate plantar pad is 


OF THE CANIDE AND URSIDA. 917 


scantily hairy, but laterally, close to the proximal margins of the 
pads and behind the naked rim above described, the hair grows 
in the form of a long fringe. This combination of features 
is only found in one other dog that I have examined, namely, 
Lycaon pictus. 

Similar features are presented by the hind foot, which, how- 
ever, 1S thinner and longer than the fore foot, the third and 
fourth toes being more prominent and less widely separable 
and the plantar pad narrower. z 

The rhinariwm is bluntly rounded in profile view. Its inferior 
edge seen from the front is strongly angular, the margin below 
the nostrils being deep anteriorly and narrow and_ shallow 
posteriorly beneath the slit; the nostrils are smallish and widely 
spaced, and the median groove does not extend up between 
them. 

The facial vibrisse are normal in position and of moderate 
length, and in the specimen examined the superior genal tuft 
consisted of two unusually widely spaced bristles. 


Lycaon pictus Temm. 
(Text-fig. 3.) 


A single example of LZ. pictus sharicus examined. 

The main peculiarity about the feet of this dog, namely, the 
suppression of the first digit of the fore foot, is well known, but 
IT am not aware that other characters have been recorded. 

In one feature at least the fore foot recalls that of Vulpes 
vulpes, namely, in the length and narrowness of the area between 
the plantar and carpal pads, but here the resemblance ceases, for 
both these pads are large, as in Canis. 

The paw itself is strikingly like that of Cuon, except that the 
digits are longer. Very suggestive of kinship between the two 
genera are the equality in the spacing of the four toes, due to the 
comparatively wide separation between the third and fourth digits, 
the nakedness of the edge of the web which joins these two digits 
together, and the great length of the hairs fringing the proximal 
margin of the digital pads, and the scantiness of the hairs clothing 
the sole between the plantar pad and these fringes. 

The hind foot is like the front, but is narrower and not so 
widely splayed. 

The chief interest attaching to the feet of Lycaon is their 
likeness in the particulars mentioned to those of Cuon, espe- 
cially as kinship between these two has been suggested on other 
grounds. 

The rhinariwm is large and wide, rounded anteriorly in profile 
view ; its upper and lower edges parallel and transverse when 
seen from the front, the inferior edge sinvous and without any 
marked median inferior prolongation. The nostrils are large, 
rounded, and somewhat widely separated, the posterior slit of the 
nostril is bordered below at its posterior end by a thick area of 


918 MR. R. I, POCOCK ON THE FEET 
moist black integument; a somewhat deep median groove ex- 
tends between the nostrils upwards from the cleft of the upper 


lip. This rhinarium is very different from that of Cuon and the 
other species and genera of Canide examined. 


Text-figure 3. 


~~ 
. WSG SS 
SAX“sxs“cKs 
SSWWay 
Ss 


= 
— ~S 


Lycaon pictus. 
A. Left fore foot. a. Naked margin of web joining third and fourth toes. 
B. Lateral view of face, showing rhinarium and vibriss. 
C. Rhinarium from the front. 


Facial vibrisse short and not numerous, except that the inter- 
ramal and inferior genal tufts, which are normal in position, 
consist of about four bristles each. The superior genal, consisting 
of one bristle only, is set much lower than in other Canide. 


Canis anthus Linn. 
(Text-fig. 4, A, B.) 


A single example of this Jackal from Morocco. 
Fore feet short, especially the third and fourth digits, which 


OF THE CANIDH AND URSIDZ. 919 


are somewhat tightly tied together, the distance between them 


much less than that which separates them from the second and 
fifth respectively. Digital pads moderately large; plantar pad 


large, both long and wide. Carpal pad large, wider than long. 


to) 


Hind foot with digits less widely spread than those of front 


foot, plantar pad much smaller both in width and length. 


Text-figure 4. 


‘ 
~ 
Wn 


ETN 


ie 
Ki 
If 


Canis anthus and C. mesomelas. 


A. Right fore foot of Canis anthus. C. Right fore foot of Canis mesomelas. 
B. Right hind foot of same. D. Right hind foot of same. 
K. Anterior view of rhinarium of C. mesomelas. 


920 MR. R. I. POCOCK ON THE FEET 


Canis mesomelas Schreb. 
(Text-fig. 4, C—E.) 


The fore foot of this species is considerably more “foxy” in 
form than that of Canis anthus. 'The area between the carpal 
and plantar pads is longer and narrower, the carpal pad is smaller, 
the plantar pad is narrower and more overgrown with hairs in 
the middle behind; the area between the plantar pad and the 
notch between the third and fourth digits is longer, the pads of 
these digits are tied more tightly together, and the edge of 
the web between them and the lateral digits is more deeply 
emarginate. 

The hind foot differs from the fore foot in the smallness of the 
plantar pad and in the still deeper emargination of the edge of 
the lateral web. 

The rhinarium is acutely rounded anteriorly in profile; from 
the front view its upper edge is straight with obtusely rounded 
angles, and its lower edge acutely angled mesially with obliquely 
sloping sides, the area beneath the nostrils in front being some- 
what shallow and becoming progressively shallower laterally and 
posteriorly beneath the narial slit. 

The facial vibrisse ave normal in position and moderately 
long (see supra, p. 901). 


Cerdocyon microtis Sclater. 
(Text-fig. 5.) 


= Canis sclateri Allen. 


A single specimen from the Amazons. 

Fore feet longer and more loosely webbed than in C. anthus, 
the third and fourth digits joined by a wider web, the distance 
between them only a little less than that between the second and 
third and fourth and fifth. Plantar pad large, but rather smaller 
relatively than in C. anthus, its median lobe wider and rounder. 
Carpal pad high up, very small, and conical. Claws short. 

Hind feet longer and narrower than fore feet and with smaller 
plantar pad, the posterior borders of the pad not deeply emar- 
ginate. Hairs between the pads thick, but not specially long. 

The rhinariwm is nearly rectangular anteriorly in profile view. 
Seen from the front its upper edge is straight and transverse 
with rather widely rounded angles ; its inferior edge is strongly and 
tolerably evenly convex, owing to the great depth of the portion 
below the nostrils in front, the portion below the slit of the 
nostrils behind narrow ; hairy area of the lip below the rhinarium 
shallow, its median slit continued upwards on to the rhinarium 
as a groove which ascends a little higher than the inferior rim of 
the nostrils. 

The faciai vibrisse moderately long—shorter, that is to say, than 
in C. mesomelas, Ps. gracilis, and the species of Vulpes; normal 
in position, except that the superior genal tuft, consisting of two 


f i. 


OF THE CANIDH AND URSIDA. 921 


bristles, is set unusually high, nearly on a level with the posterior 
canthus of the eye. 


Text-figure 5. 


Cerdocyon microtis. 


A. Right fore foot. C. Rhinarium from the front. 
B. Right hind foot. D. Rhinarium from the side. 


Points to be noticed in connection with this species, apart from 
the remarkably small size of the ears, which are only 27 inches 
(56 mm.) long *, are the comparatively wide and nearly even 
spacing of the digital pads when stretched, the very small size of 
the carpal and pollical pads, the depth of the rhinarium below 
the nostrils in front, and the high position of the superior genal 


vibrisse. 


* Most of the South American dogs have the ears as long relatively as in typical 
foxes (Vulpes vulpes), which about equal Cerdocyon microtis im size and have a skull 
of about the same length. But, according to Miller, the ears of V. vulpes range from 
82 to 98 mm. 

The czecum in this example of C. microtis was short and uncoiled as recorded by 
Garrod of C. cancrivorus (= C. thous), and there is very little doubt that these 
two species are tolerably closely related. On the other hand, in the specimen of 
Ps. gracilis from Cordova and in an example of Ps. azaricus from Mar del Plata, the 
cecum was longer and coiled, as described by Garrod of C. antarcticus. There are 
discrepancies in the accounts of the cecum of C. azare, Mivart stating it to be 
straight and Garrod stating it to be coiled. The name azare, however, has been 
given to at least two distinct species, one belonging to the thous- or cancrivorus- 
group and another to the culpeus-group of South American dogs (see Thomas, Amn. 
Mag. Nat. Hist. (8) vol. xiii. p. 345, 1914). No doubt, Mivart and Garrod had 
different species under examination, and that Mivart’s determination was probably 
correct may be surmised from the fact that true azar belongs to the thous-group. 


922 


MR. R. 1. POCOCK ON THE FEET 


Pseudalopex gracilis Burm. ?* 
(Text-fig. 6.) 


A half-grown specimen of this or an allied species of the 
culpeus-group from Cordova. 


Feet long, the small conical carpal pad high above the plantar 
pad, the pad of the first digit about on a level with the mid-point 


Text-figure 6. 


‘Y 


Wrt{\y\) 


\ 


Pseudalopex gracilis ? 
A. Left fore foot. C. Rhinarium from the front. 
B. Left hind foot. D. Rhinarium from the side. 

between the two. 


Plantar pad long as compared with its width, 
narrowly cordate with deeply emarginate posterior border. 
digits moderately long, with small pads and unusually distensible, 


The 
individual is a little uncertain. 


* Typical gracilis came from Mendoza. Hence the determination of this young 


OF THE CANIDA AND URSIDA. 923 


so that the foot is extraordinarily wide when spread to the fullest 
extent, the third and fourth capable of being separated until the 
inner edges of the pads are in a transverse, almost straight, line 
with the border of the web connecting them which is only lightly 
emarginate, the width of this web about twice the length of one 
of the pads and exceeding the distance between the pads of the 
second and third or fourth and fifth digits. Claws long and 
slender. The hairs on the lower surface of the foot abundant, 
silky,and long, completely concealing the pads when undisturbed. 

Hind foot very like the fore foot, but smaller, the posterior 
portion of the plantar pad more overgrown with hairs. 

The rhinariwm is rectangularly rounded in front in profile ; 
from the front view its upper edge is wide and straight with 
nearly rectangularly rounded angles, its inferior border is 
mesially angular with obliquely sloping, slightly sinuous sides, 
the area below the nostrils being moderately deep in front and 
narrow posteriorly below the slit; the hairy area of the lower 
lip below the rhinarium in front is moderately deep and the 
cleft is continued upwards as a shallow groove between the 
nostrils. 

The facial vibrisse are long and abundant and normal in 
position, about six superciliaries, three interramals, and three to 
each of the genal tufts. Im an example of Ps. azaricus from 
Mar del Plata, the vibrissee resemble those of the species above 
identified as Ps. gracilis. 

The feet of Ps. gracilis suggest adaptation to desert conditions, 
the spread of the digits and the thick hairy clothing preventing 
sinking in the sand. 

It will be interesting to see in the future to what extent the 
feet of the other fox-like South American dogs, suchas Ps. culpeus, 
conform to this type, which differs so widely from that of some 
of the true foxes of the Old World, like Vulpes and Otocyon. 


Alopex lagopus. 
(Text-fig. 7.) 


A single old female specimen of 4. lagopus spitzbergensis. 

The feet differ from those of all the species of Canide 
examined in the presence of a distinct thickish ridge of integu- 
ment, passing forwards from the median lobe of the plantar pad 
to the area behind the point of junction of the third and fourth 
digits, and dividing the glandular depression between the digital 
and plantar pads into right and left portions. Moreover, the 
area of the integument on the proximal side of the digital 
pads is thickened and cushion-like, not gradually sloped away, so 
that the partially divided depression is bordered in front and 
laterally by elevated walls, making it appear deeper than in other 
species. The median longitudinal ridge of skin is not so high as 
the plantar pad and as the thickening behind the third and fourth 


Proc. Zoou, Soc.—1914, No. LXII. 62 


924 MR. R. I. POCOCK ON THE FEET 


Text-figure 7. 


Alopex lagopus. 


A. Right fore foot. C. Rhinarvium from the front. 
B. Right hind foot. D. Rhinarium from the side. 


digits, and, like the thickenings in question, it is clothed with 
longish hairs *. 

The feet are shorter and more “ dog-like” than in Vulpes and 
Otocyon, owing mainly to the third and fourth toes being shorter 
and a little more widely separable. The digital pads are small 
and the plantar pad is a little wider than in Vulpes and more 
overgrown posteriorly, so that it appears more deeply hollowed 
out. The carpal pad is nearer the plantar pad, and is small and 
irregularly semicircular in outline. Claws very long. 

The rhinariwm in profile view is nearly rectangularly pointed, 
and much shorter than in any other species examined. From 
the front view the summit is mesially nearly flat with widely- 
rounded angles; the inferior edge is not strongly angled, the 


* Tn the specimen examined, an old female which had been over ten years in the 
Gardens, the hair on the integumental thickenings was worn off by walking on 
concrete. But the outline of the digital pads could be distinguished by their scaly 
pattern, the thickenings being pitted with hair-follicles. 


OF THE CANIDA AND URSIDA. 925 


nostrils are large and separated by a very narrow septum, and 
the groove from the upper lip extends upwards to a point just 
above the inferior border of the nostrils. 

The vibrisse are normal in position, and the mystacial and 
submental bristles are shorter than in Vulpes or Canis mesomelas. 

Until Miller published his ‘Catalogue of the Mammals of 
Western Europe,’ the Arctic fox was not regarded as generically 
distinct from Vulpes, although Kaup and, later, Gray had applied 
generic names to it, because of the unsatisfactory nature of the 
characters by which it was distinguished. It cannot be claimed 
that the diagnostic features employed by Miller are of great 
value, as he himself seems prepared to admit. Most of them are 
cranial *, the only external feature mentioned being the shorter 
and more rounded ear. If such characters, however, be used for 
distinguishing ‘“‘ Alopecoid”’ genera, it will be necessary to give 
generic status to nearly every species of fox—ausing “‘ species” in its 
old sense. Judged, however, by its feet, the Arctic fox is quite 
distinguishable generically from Vulpes vulpes and bengalensis 
and from Ofocyon, and the same may be said of the rhinarium 7. 

In the extent of the area of the sole applied to the ground the 
feet of Alopex lagopus show superficial resemblance to those of 
Speothos venaticus, and a comparison between the two species 
suggests that the structural modification described as fusion of the 
pads in the latter is due to the nakedness of the integumental 
cushions behind the pads. But since in Speothos the naked areas 
regarded as pads are granular throughout, and show no trace of 
hair-follicles like the thickened integument behind the pads in 
Alopex, the view put forward in this paper, that the pads of 
Speothos ave enlarged and fused, appears to be correct. 


Vulpes vulpes Linn. 
(Text-fig. 8, A.) 


Feet long and narrow with comparatively small pads and long 
claws. Carpal pad small and set high above the plantar pad ; 
and the digital pad of the first digit (poliex) above the middle of 
the area between the carpal and plantar pads. 

Plantar pad moderately wide, but subcrescentic in form, owing 
to the encroachment of the hair over its median portion 
posteriorly. Third and fourth digits especially long and tied 
together by a narrow web, so that the interval between them, 
when extended, is much less than the interval between the second 


* One feature mentioned needs restating. It is said that the interorbital region 
of the skull is more elevated than in Vulpes, owing to greater inflation of the 
frontal sinuses. Asa matter of fact, the frontal sinuses, as Huxley pointed out, are 
undeveloped, as in other “ Alopecoid ” skulls, the inflation in question being caused 
by the upward extension of the nasal passages. 

+ The caudal gland in the specimen examined was larger than in any species of 
Canide that I have looked at. It was a hairless patch of very thick glandular skin 
about 25mm. long and one-third longer than wide. There was no underfur mixed 
with the hairs surrounding it; and, like the feet, it gave out a strong “foxy” smell. 

62* 


PA MR. R. I. POCOCK ON THE FEET 


and third and the third and fourth digits. The length of the 
four digits makes the edge of the web connecting the median 
and lateral toes appear widely scooped out. The claws are long 
and the hair clothing the area between the digital and plantar 


pads is thick, but not long*. 


Vulpes bengalensis Shaw. 
(Text-fig. 8, B—D.) 


The feet are similar in a general way to those of V. vulpes, but 
the third and fourth digits are, if anything, relatively longer 


Text-figure 8. 


L y 
Mie 
ce a 
DWN Zz 
i Y 


) Y 
CMMI, 
‘ 7 
ZN) 
ug 
? lf) Ye, 


SAA 1 
SSS AN 


\ 
x 


NIN 
DENA 
AN 


Vulpes and Otocyon. 


A. Left fore foot of Vulpes vulpes. D. Rhinarium of same, from the side. 
B. Left fore foot of Vulpes bengalensis. EK. Rhinarium of Otoeyon megalotis, 
C. Rhinarium of same, from the front. from the side. 


F. The same, from the front. 


* The hairiness of the soles of the feet may vary seasonally in this species, as it 
does in some of the northern Canidee. Very likely, too, variation in this respect 
will be found between geographical races of V. vulpes. 


OF THE CANIDA AND URSIDA. 927 


and the second and fifth shorter. The carpal pad is relatively 
larger, the posterior region of the plantar pad is less overgrown 
with hair, and the hairs arising just behind the digital pads are 
exceedingly long and project forwards beneath the pads as far as 
the tip of the long slender claws. 

The rhinariwm is slightly acutely rounded in profile view 
anteriorly ; from the front its upper edge is tolerably evenly 
curved and its inferior border only slightly angled mesially, the 
area below the nostril being moderately deep in front and narrow 
below the slit posteriorly. 

The facial vibrisse are long and normal in position. 


Otocyon megalotis Desin. 
(Text-fig. 8, E, F.) 


In all essential respects the feet of this fox, accorded generic 
‘ank mainly by reason of its abnormal dentition, agree with 
those of Vulpes vulpes and bengalensis, although the third and 
fourth digits are a little shorter. The median lobe of the plantar 
pad is a little more prominent, especially as compared with that 
of V. bengalensis, and its posterior border is emarginate by the 
erowth of hairs as in that species. The carpal pad is very small. 

The rhinariwm is slightly elevated above and rectangularly 
rounded anteriorly in profile view ; seen from the front its upper 
edge is straight with obtusely rounded angles and its lower edge 
is angular, the portion below the nostrils being shallow and very 
narrow laterally and posteriorly below the slit. 

The facial vibrisse ave normal in position and moderately long. 


CONCLUSION. 


Although only a few species of Canidee, compared with the 
numbers known, have been described in the foregoing pages, 
they fortunately represent the main groups of generic or 
subgeneric rank into which the family has been divided.  [t is 
probable therefore, | think, that the extremes of variation in 
the structure of the feet, in the shape of the rhinarium, and the 
disposition of the vibrisse have been observed. 

It does not appear to me to be likely that the broad distinetion 
between Speothos and the rest will be lessened by the examination 
of other species—and probably Lycaon and Cuon, and possibly 
Alopex, will also remain isolated; but it would be rash to assume 
in the present state of our knowledge that the differences in 
foot-structure between the species recorded under Pseudalopex, 
Oerdocyon, Canis, and Vulpes will hold good in all cases when 
the species related to them come to hand for examination. 
That, however, remains to be seen. 

In the meantime, it may be useful to tabulate the results so 
far achieved to show briefly how the species may be grouped, 
and to draw attention to the more salient characters presented 
by the feet. In the following table, however, | have only made 


928 MR. R. I. POCOCK ON THE FEET 


use of the fore feet, partly in the interests of brevity, partly because 
they supply the best characters, and partly because the features 
presented by the vibrissee and rhinarium call for verification on 
fresh material, which is unavailable at the present time :— 


a. Pad of pollex set low down close to the posterior lateral angle 
of the plantar pad; pads of third and fourth digits basally 
united; edge of web between median and lateral digits naked ; 
area between digital and plantar pads and between carpal and 
plantar pads scantily covered with short hair ............ Speothos venaticus. 
a’. Pad of pollex, when present, high above plantar pad ; pads of 
third and fourth digits separated; edge of webs joing the 
median with the lateral digits hairy ; area between digital pads 
and plantar pad and between the latter and the carpal pad 
mostly thickiy hairy. 
b. Edge of web joining third and fourth digits naked, forming a 
definite hairless band; a long fringe rising behind this and 
extending round the periphery of the foot behind the digital 
pads. 
ec. Pollex suppressed, feet long, carpal pad high above plantar 
pad ane cin Sa < bbe eal. Seek ames Lycaon pictus. 
ce’. Pollex retained; feet shorter, carpal pad moderately high 
above plantar Pads. .<s.cn2.-c-con-nteerectbecercsesersmssensass CULO POPU GMS: 
b’. Edge of web between third and fourth digits hairy. 
d. Glandular depression between pads undivided ; integument 
proximal to the pads not specially thickened. 
e. Third and fourth digits exceedingly widely separable, the 
edge of their web when stretched forming a straight line 
about twice the length of the pads of either digit; plantar 
pad long and narrow .............00600e00:c01eeeee Pseudalopex gracilis. 
e’. Third and fourth digits much less widely separable, the 
edge of the web between them emarginate when stretched 
and less than the length of the pad of either digit. 
f. Plantar pad large, its width exceeding the length between 
its median lobe and the margin of the web between the 
shorter third and fourth digits; claws short. 
g. Carpal pad very small, third and fourth digits more 
widely separated, the web joining them, when ex- 
tended, as wide as that between them and the 
Nateralidigiisy s.ieecee selec cstaecs Cerdocyon microtis. 
g’. Carpal pad large, third and fourth digits more closely 
united; the connecting web narrower than that 
between them and the lateral digits... Canis anthus, mesomelas*. 
f’. Plantar pad small, its width considerably less than the 
distance between its median lobe and the edge of 
the narrow web between the long third and fourth 
digits; claws long vecereccesscsseeeese Vulpes vulpes and 
bengalensis ; Otocyon megalotis. 
d’. Glandular depression between digital and plantar pads 
divided by a ridge of thick skin stretching forwards from 
the median lobe of the plantar pad; integument surround- 
ing proximal portion of digital pads much swollen and 
cushion-like; feet otherwise almost as under e’ ......... Alopex lagopus. 


The above-given analysis of the characters of the feet of the 
Canidee emphasises the distinctness. of Speothos from the rest of 
the genera, and does not afford support to the affiliation of Speothos 


* The feet of domestic breeds of dogs come under this heading. The feet of 


some breeds indeed conform very closely to the type seen in Canis anthus (see 
P. ZS. 1914, pp. 478-484). 


OF THE CANIDA AND URSIDA. 929 


with Cuon and Lycaon in the Cuon-group opposed to the Canis- 
group containing Canis, Vulpes, and Otocyon*. 

On the contrary, the distinctness of Speothos may, | think, be 
justifiably expressed by setting the genus aside in a special 
subfamily, the Speothoinz, the remaining genera being called 
Canine. 

There is, as yet, no agreement respecting the number of genera 
into which the Canide are divisible, but all recent zoologists are 
in accord in admitting Lycaon, Cuon, Canis, Vulpes, Otocyon and 
probably Vyctereutes and Urocyon. Both Vulpes and Canis have 
been further subdivided into many genera or subgenera. 
Thomas, for instance, has recently shown that, apart from 
Speothos, the following South American dogs have been 
generically named as follows :—Chrysocyon for jubatus; Dasicyon 
for antarcticus ; Cerdocyon for thous (= cancrivorus) and brasi- 
hiensis (= azare); Pseudalopex for magellanicus, azaricus, etc., 
and Lycalopex for vetulus. At present, however, these genera 
are, | believe, merely nominal, in the sense of being undefined. 
There will be time enough to discuss their validity when the 
distinctive features have been ascertained and stated ; and the 
same may be said for such subdivisions of Vulpes as Vennecus and 
Zerda. Possibly extended study of the feet and other external 
features may help the settlement of this difficult question. 


Family Urnsip# . 


The subjoined account of the feet and the noses of the 
Urside is based upon the examination of examples of the 
following species that have died in the Gardens, namely, the Polar 
Bear (Thalarctos maritimus), the American Black Bear (Ursus 
americanus), the Himalayan Bear (Zremarctos thibetanus), and 
the Sloth Bear (Jelursus wrsinus); and secondly, upon observa- 
tions on living examples in the Society’s menagerie and upon 
dried skins in the British Museum, The four species in question 
exhibit the extreme range of variation in the structure of the 
feet, the Polar Bear and the Sloth Bear being at opposite poles 
in the matter of modification; and all the other existing species 
of bears agreeing, apart from minor details, either with 
U. americanus or with 7’. thibetanus. 

The general shape of the feet of bears is well known. 
Measured from the carpus or the tarsus to the tips of the 
phalanges, they are remarkably short and broad. The five digital 
pads form a slightly curved line, the second, third, and fourth 
being nearly on a level and a little in advance of the first and 
fifth. A short distance behind these pads, and separated from 
them by a comparatively thin-skinned depression, comes the wide 


* By Matthew and Osborn (‘The Age of Mammals,’ 1910). I do not, however, 
know the nature of the evidence on which this classification was based. 

+ Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (8) vol. xiii. p. 352 (1914). 

+ For the generic terms adopted for this family see infra, pp. 9389-940. 


930 MR. R. I. POCOCK ON THE FEET 


and flattish main or plantar pad*. Behind the plantar pad of 
the fore foot there is always one additional carpal pad on the 
external or ulnar side of the carpus; and on the hind foot there 
is always a larger or smaller naked area, which may involve the 
whole of the posterior portion of the sole as far back as the heel. 
It is mainly, however, in the degree of hairiness of this area 
behind the plantar pads of both fore and hind feet that the 
greatest variation is exhibited. 


Feet of the Polar Bear (Thalarctos maritimus). 
(Text-fig. 9, A, B.) 


Tn two newly-born cubs of Polar Bears from Spitzbergen, the 
digital pads are not webbed, but are separated to the base as in 
all bears except Meluwrsus. The depressed area between them 
and the very short and wide plantar pad is scantily covered with 
very short hairs, and the area behind the plantar pad is similarly 
covered, except for the small external carpal pad on the fore foot 
and a corresponding, elongated, somewhat piriform, anteriorly 
pointed, small, flat pad on the sole of the hind foot, which are 
quite naked. 

In our adult living examples the soles of the feet, apart from 
the digital and plantar pads, the carpal pad, and the corresponding 
elliptical area on the hind foot, are thickly covered mostly with 
long hair, except the sole of the hind foot, where the hair is 
worn short; and in a male specimen a narrow strip of naked 
skin extends forwards from the naked elliptical area to the 
plantar pad of the hind foot. The feet, in fact, agree with the 
description of the feet of the Polar Bear, recently published by 
G.S. Miller t, who says :—-“ Fore feet with palmar tubercles and 
balls of toes essentially as in U. aretos, but smaller; pad on hind 
foot without backward continuation along inner [outer] portion 
of sole.” Since Miller did not detect the little naked pad behind 
the plantar pad on the hind foot, it is possible that this pad is 
sometimes, perhaps seasonally, covered with hair. But its 
presence in this newly-born cub is full of significance. 


Feet of the black Bear (Ursus americanus). 
(Text-figs. 10 and 13, D, F.) 


The fore feet of an adult male Black Bear from Newfound- 
land agree in essential points with those of the Polar Bear, that 
is to say, the digital pads are separated, the depression behind 
them is covered thickly with long hairs, and the area behind the 
plantar pad is similarly clothed with hairs, from which the carpal 


* It is the custom sometimes to call the main pad of the fore foot the “ palmar” 
and that of the hind foot the “plantar” pad. But in this paper I have used the 
term plantar for the main pads of both fore and hind feet. 

+ Cat. Mamm. Western Europe, p. 298,1912. In his description of the hind foot 
of this species, as of U. arctos, Miller wrote “inner” for “ outer.” 


OF THE CANIDA! AND URSIDE. 93] 


Text-figure 9. 


Sat ee 


Swe SS 


Zz 


Le, 

a 

BZ 
Z 


Newly-born cubs of Polar Bear (Thalarctos maritimus) and of European 
Brown Bear (Ursus arctos). 
A. Left hind foot of Polar Bear (Thalarctos C. Right hind foot of Brown Bear 
maritimus), the digits spread. (Ursus arctos). 
B. Left fore foot of same. D. Left fore foot of same. 


1 and 5, first and fifth digits ; Cp., carpal pad; p., pad on sole of 
hind foot of 7. maritimus. 


pad rises like an island. But this pad, the digital pads, and 
especially the plantar pad are relatively large. ‘The hind foot, 
however, is very different, in being mostly naked almost back to 
the heel. On the inner or hallucal side, however, the hair grows 
inwards from the edge of the foot for a short distance behind 


932 MR. R. I. POCOCK ON THE FEET 


the plantar pad, filling up the depression which at this point 
separates this pad from the posterior naked part of the sole. 


Text-figure 10. 


Kira el) HI 


/ 


B 


Ursus americanus. 
A. Right hind foot. B. Right fore foot. 
1 and 5, first and fifth digits; Cp., carpal pad. 


Feet of the Himalayan Bear (Tremarctos thibetanus). 
(Text-figs. 11 and 13, C.) 


The fore feet differ markedly in one or twg points from those 
of the Black Bear. 'The area between the digital pads and the 
plantar pad is hairy only behind the pads of the second, third, 
and fourth digits; behind the first and fifth of these pads it is 
naked and the digital pad of the first is smaller and set still _ 
farther back, its distal end scarcely reaching the proximal end 
of that of the second. The plantar pad is large. Behind it 
there is a naked depression of thinner skin and the carpal region 
is also wholly naked, the ulnar carpal pad forming a large pro- 
tuberance and the radial a smaller one. ‘This smooth carpal area 


OF THE CANIDA AND URSIDA. 933 


is sharply circumseribed behind by the dense clothing of hair 
covering the lower side of the leg. 

The hind foot broadly resembles that of UJ. americanus, except 
that the depression behind the digital pads is clothed with hairs 
in the same way as the fore feet and the hairs from the inner 
edge do not encroach upon the sole in the depression marking off 
the plantar pad postero-internally. The tips of the pads of the 
first and fifth digits slightly overlap the proximal ends of those 
of the second and fourth respectively. 


Text-figure 11. 


Wij, 
SUC Ba UN mG Ni 
Ny Hit 


Win 
y 


sy) 


Zaman 
SENSORS 


aX 


eee, 


Tremarctos thibetanus. 
A. Right hind foot. Bb. Right fore foot. 
1 and 5, first and fifth digits ; Cp., carpal pad. 


Feet of the Sloth Bear (Melursus ursinus). 
(Text-figs. 12 & 13, A, E.) 


The feet differ from those of all other species of Ursidee, in 
that the digital pads are fused almost to their distal ends, 
so that no hair projects between them from the sides of the 
digits, and the first and fifth digits are set far forwards as 
compared, at all events, with 7’, thibetanus. Moreover, the 
depression behind the the digital pads is quite naked, as Gray 
pointed out. In the fore feet the carpal area is naked, as in 


934 MR. R. I. POCOCK ON THE FEET 


T. thibetanus, but this naked area is not sharply defined behind 
by a coating of thick hair, but passes insensibly into the skin of 
the posterior surface of the leg, which inferiorly is scantily 
clothed with short hairs. The sole of the hind foot is entirely 
naked, the posterior limit of the plantar pad being marked by 
a transverse groove, which expands into a shallow depression on 
the hallucal or inner side. 


Text-figure 12. 


7 


2 itty o) 4 
awh, 


a i! With am 


WAG 
Melursus ursinus. 
C. Left hind foot (too narrow for its length). D. Left fore foot. 


1 and 5, first and fifth digits; Cp., carpal pad. 


Feet of other Species of Bears. 


The feet of the Polar Bear and of the Sloth Bear are unique 
in the family, but those of other species, of which I have only 
seen dried skins or living specimens, agree in the main with those 
either of 7. thibetanus or of U. americanus, U. arctos and 
horribilis falling into the same category as U. americanus and 
Helarctos malayanus, and 7’. ornatus into that of 7’. thibetanus. 


OF THE CANIDA AND URSIDA. 935 


G. 8. Miller * describes the feet of the Brown Bear of Western 
Europe as follows :—“‘ Balls of the digits [of fore feet] large, 
pad-like ... first digit with anterior edge of ball extending about 
to middle of that of second, the interval greater than in the case 
of the other digit .... main pad wider than long, covering more 
than half the surface of the palm, its outer border about twice as 
long as its inner, its posterior border slightly concave, its inner 
portion at base of thumb [1st digit] marked off from the rest by 
a slight furrow; region between main pad and balls of digits 
densely furred; wrist-pad about as large as ball of digits, near 
outer ulnar margin of palm, its long diameter transverse ; region 
between wrist-pad and main pad densely furred... Hind foot 
longer than fore foot, pad like that of fore foot, but with a broad 
backward extension passing along inner [outer] side nearly or 
quite to heel; region between pad and balls of toes and at outer 
[inner | side of backward extension densely furred.” 

In a newly-born cub of U. arctos (text-fig. 9, C, D, p. 931), the 

area between the digital and plantar pads of both fore and hind 
feet is scantily covered with very short hairs, the posterior or 
heel pad of the hind foot is naked, and there is a well-marked 
depression of wrinkled skin on the inner side of the foot between 
this pad and the plantar pad. In the fore foot the area behind 
the plantar pad is scantily clothed with short hairs, and the conical 
carpal pad is situated near the postero-external portion of this 
area. 
_ So faras I have been able to examine them, the living bears 
of this species in the Gardens, namely examples from the White 
Sea, Caucasus, Himalayas, Behring Sea, and Alaska, have the 
feet as above described by Miller, except that the entire sole of 
the hind foot is generally naked, there being usually no extension 
of the hair behind the plantar pad on the inner side. In some 
Brown Bears, too, there is a narrow strip of scantily-haired skin 
extending from the carpal pad to the plantar pad of the fore foot, 
and sometimes a small naked area marks the position of a radial 
carpal pad. These points may be worth further investigation 
from the systematic point of view. 

In one of two Grizzly Bears (U. horribilis) from Montana, the 
feet seem to resemble those of our Brown Bears; and Mx. Seton’s 
figure of the paws of the Grizzly show the same conformity to 
the Brown Bear type. 

The chief difference between the feet of U. americanus, on the 
one hand, and WY. arctos and horribilis, on the other, is that in 
the former the first digit and the carpal pad seem to be set 
farther back. 


Tremarctos thibetanus ranges from Baluchistan to Kastern Asia, 
and is represented in Japan by 7’. japonicus, which is probably 


* Cat. Mamm. Western Europe, p. 287, 1912. 

+ The sole is continuous along the outer, not along the inner side of the foot. 
The hairy ingrowth interrupting the continuity of the sole oceurs on the inner or 
hallucal side. 


936 MR. R. I. POCOCK ON THE FEET 


only a subspecies of it. At all events, the feet are the same in 
the two forms. 

Moreover, the feet of the Malayan Bear (Helarctos malayanus) 
agree in all essential respects with those of 7. thibetanus, except 
that the hairs in the depression behind the second, third, and 
fourth digital pads are much fewer in number, the integument 
being scantily furred, and thus approximating the naked con- 
dition of this area seen in Melursus. The Andean Bear (7. 
ornatus) also resembles 7’. thibetanus in the structure of its feet, 
except that the depression behind the digital pads is continuously 
and thickly hairy, even behind the pads of the first and fifth 
digits. 


Structural Adaptation of the Feet to Habits. 


The bionomical reason for the differences in the structure of 
the feet of existing Urside is obscure. The first thing to note 
is the rough correspondence between the hairiness and nakedness 
of the sole and the geographical latitudes inhabited by the 
species. The hairiest feet of all are found in the Arctic species 
(Thalarctos maritimus), and this feature is always assumed, 
probably correctly, to be a modification to obviate the likelihood 
of slipping on ice. But it must also be remembered that the 
haunts of this bear are treeless, and that this species is unable to 
climb. South of the range of the Polar Bear come the various 
races of Ursus arctos, of U. horribilis, and of U. americanus, 
which have larger pads on the fore and hind feet than in 
Thalarctos maritimus and the greater part, at all events, of the 
sole of the hind feet naked. Even the northern form of these 
species, by reason of their hibernation, are never abroad for any 
length of time when the cold is severe enough to cover the 
ground for weeks at a time under a continuous sheet of frozen 
snow. The countries they inhabit are forested, and both the 
Black and the Brown Bears are known to climb trees, The 
Grizzly does not climb—at all events, asa rule,—but he probably 
could do so, if necessary, though, on account of his greater bulk, 
not with such ease as the Black Bear and smaller representatives 
of the Brown Bear. Nevertheless, neither the Black Bear nor 
the Brown Bear seems to be so apt at climbing as the three 
naked-footed bears of the Old World, namely, the Himalayan, 
the Malayan, and the Sloth *; and living examples of these 
species have an obviously clumsier, more shufHing gait than the 
northern species, and this awkwardness of movement is due very 
largely, if not wholly, to the natural mturning of the fore feet. 


* I know nothing of the Andean Bear (U. ornatus) in this connection. Of the 
Himalayan Brown Bear (U. arctos isabellinus), Blanford says :—“ They can climb 
trees, but, in the Himalayas, at all events, rarely do so” ; of the Himalayan Bear, “it 
is more in the habit of climbing trees for fruit [than the Brown Bear], and is not 
infrequently found in fruit trees,” and of the Malayan species “this bear is a purely 
forest animal and an admirable climber,’ while his account of the Sloth Bear 
contains many references to its scansorial habits. 


OF THE CANID® AND URSIDA, 937 


This characteristic of the limbs is more marked in the Malayan 
and the Sloth Bear than in the Himalayan, which in this, as in 
other respects, comes nearer the group of bears typified by 
U. arctos. I think it probable that the nakedness of the carpal 
area of the underside of the fore foot in those three species as 
well as the inturning of the paws are adaptations to climbing, 
because naked roughish integument will give a better hold on 
bark than integument nonenedl with hairs, a Aad during the ascent 
or backward descent of a vertical tree-trunk—bears : always climb 
down rear end foremost—the upward turn of the fore paws gives 
the claws a securer grip on the bark, because their points are set 
at right angles to the axis of the trunk, without interfering with 
the clasping action of the limb. 


Noses of Bears. 


The rhinarium of Bears is always large and naked, and is 
circumscribed above and at the sides by the short hairs of the 
muzzle and upper lips. Usually the hair on the summit of 
the muzzle forms nearly a straight line, passing from the posterior 
notch of one nostril to that of the other; and beneath the 
rhinarium the hairs of the upper lip extend almost or quite to — 
the middle line, leaving at most a narrow strip of naked integu- 
ment below the rhinarium. I have not been able to examine 
sufficiently closely a large enough number of specimens to show 
the variation in width to which this strip of integument is liable 
in Ursus arctos, horribilis, americanus, Tremarctos thibetanus, 
ornatus, but in all these species, as in- Thalarctos maritimus, it 
is at most a few millimetres wide, narrower, that is to say, than 
the median area of the remem between the § inner edges of the 
nostrils. 

But in the Sloth Bear (Welursus) the rhinarium 1s very large. 
Dorsally it extends forwards so as to overhang the nostrils and 
backwards some distance behind the posterior end of the slit of 
the nostrils. It is also much wider beneath the slit laterally and 
there is a very wide median area of moist skin annexed to the 
rhinavium on the upper lip. ‘The only bear possessing a rhinarivin 
approaching that of d/elursus in relative size is Helarctos malay- 
Gaius, which, in this respect, 1s intermediate between 7'remarctos 
thibetanuws iad Melursus ursinus. In both these species the 
vreater size of the rhinarium and of the moist naked area below 
it, is associated with the mobility of the snout and upper lip, 
which is a marked feature in /Helarctos malayanus and reaches 
an extreme in Jelursus wrsinus. 

The facial vibrisse of Bears are reduced in number and length, 
as compared with those of most other Carnivores. A few buccal 
and supevciliary bristles are retained, but the genals and inter- 
ramals appear to be suppressed as a rule. The genals [ did not 
find in any of the dead specimens examined, but in the example 


938 MR. R. I. POCOCK ON THE FEET 


of 7. thibetanus the interramal tuft was represented by a single 
longish hair. 
Text-figure 13. 


NS\\\ \T 
\ SS \M}} 


NYG Wy 


Lug A sers 


\ 


enti: 
Nae a 


~ 


Rhinaria of Bears. 


A. Anterior view of rhinarium of Melursus wrsinus. 


Bb. Ditto Helarctos malayanus (from a dried skin). 
(OF Ditto Tremarctos thibetanus. 

D. Ditto Ursus americanus. 

Ii. Side view of lips and rhinarium of Welursus wrsinus. 

F. Ditto Ursus americanus. 


Systematic Value of the Feet. 


From time to time the Urside have been split up into a 
considerable number of genera and subgenera, based partly upon 
external, but mainly upon dental and cranial characters, the only 
well-marked species which has never apparently received a special 


OF THE CANIDAH AND URSID_E. 939 


title, even from Gray, beike U. thibetanus. For instance, we 
have Thalarctos (usually altered to Thalassarctos) for mar itimus ; 
Ursus for arctos and its allies, Danis for horribilis, Huarctos for 
americanus, Tremarctos for ornatus, Helarctos for malayannus: and 
Melursus for ursinus. Melursus seems to be admitted on all 
hands as valid; but probably no two existing zoologists could be 
found to agree stort the others, though a majority would most 
likely favour the severance of patireios from Ursus. Flower 
and Lydekker (* Mammalia Living and Extinct,’ pp. 558-560, 
1891), for example, gave full generic value to Melina g 
Ursus, and divided the lait. into the Thalarctine section for 
maritimus ; the Ursine for arctos, horribilis, americanus, thibetanus, 
ornatus and their allies, and the elaxetine section for malayonus. 
Max Weber (Die Stiug. p- 539, 1904) admitted Ursus, with 
Thalarctos as a subgenus, JHellerwetion and Melursus, hat only 
diagnosed the latter; and Beddard (* Mammalia,’ pp. 442-443) 
allowed Ursus and Melursus, dismissing Vhalarctos as a “quite 
unnecessary ” genus. 

Trouessart (Cat. Mamm. Suppl. pp. 178-182, 1904) followed 
Flower and Lydekker in the main, but gave subgeneric value to 
the sections of Ur ‘sus, adding Euarctos ie them, aad accorded full 
generic status to Tnemacinting | for the 8. Aumentieate Bears. 

Finally, Matthew and Osborn (‘The Age of Mammals,’ p- 530, 
1910) adopted the four genera, Ursus for the Grizzly, Brown, and 
American Black Bears, : and, I presume, for the Himalayan and 
Malayan as well, Talanaios for the Polar Bear, 7vemarctos for 
the Andean or Spectacled Bear, and Melursus for the Sloth 
Bear. 

The divergence of opinion with respect to the status of such 
species as maritumus, americanus, ornatus, and malayanus, in 
dicated by these classifications, suggests that the characters used 
for their elevation to the elk oo genera or subgenera cannot be 
very well marked *. But in view a the conclusions arising from 
the facts established in this paper, the one inter esting point ABOUE 
which these authors seem to be in accord, differ as they may 
about the four species just quoted, is that thihetanus is inseparable 
from Ursus, even in the most restricted sense assigned to that 
term. 

Beyond stating that the soles of the feet are more hairy in 
the Polar Bear, ‘the authors above quoted made no systematic 
use of the extremities, although Gray had previously pointed out 
some distinguishing featur es presented by them. He detected, 


* The classifications of 'Frouessart and of Osborn & Matthews are, however. mere 
lists of names, no reasons for the arrangement adopted being given. It would he 
interesting to know why these authors, alone of those quoted, give full generic value 
to ormatus. 

+ Considering the wide field covered by his work, - Gray was head and 
shoulders in front of many of his predecessors and successors as a sy stematist in the 
strict sense of the word. One is tuo apt to allow his mistakes, arising trom his 
curious limitations, to obscure one’s regard for the perspicacity he undoubtedly 
possessed in the detection of structural differences, 


Proc. Zoon. Soc.—1914, No. LXIII. 63 


940 MR. R. I. POCOCK ON THE FEET 


for instance, that the area behind the digital pads in the Sloth 
Bear is naked, whereas it is hairy in others. But he does not 
appear to have noticed the marked differences presented by the 
carpal area in the matter of hairiness and nakedness in various 
species, and his statement that in 7 halassarctos the *‘ soles of the 
feet are hairy with a few callous pads, whereas in Ursus, Helarctos, 
and Melursus they are bald and callous,” gives very little idea of 
the true state of affairs (see Cat. Carn. ete. Mammalia, pp. 217- 
237, 1869). 

Judged by the characters discussed in this paper, the following 
genera seem to me worthy of admission—Velursus, Helarctos, 
Tremarctos, Ursus, and Thalarctos. They may be defined as 
follows :— 


a. Digital pads fused almost up to their distal ends, depression 
between them and the plantar pad of both fore and hind feet 
naked; carpal area of fore paw naked with large rounded 
external and smaller internal pads; integument of fore leg 
behind carpal area scantily covered with short hairs; snout 
highly mobile, rhinarium very large, extending to edge of lip 
as a broad moist area and overhanging the nostrils above ...... Melursus. 
6. Digital pads separated throughout their length, depression 
between them and the plantar pads more or less hairy; 
integument behind carpal area thickly covered with hair; 
snout less mobile, rhinarium smaller and not overhanging the 
nostrils. 
ec. Carpal area as in Melwrsus, naked and furnished with a 
larger rounded external and a smaller internal pad. 
d, Hair on upper lip not extending beneath the nostrils in 
front, but leaving a comparatively wide moist median 
area continuous with the rhinarium above ................... Helarctos*. 
d’, Hair on upper lip extending nearly to middle line and 
leaving only a narrow naked strip of skin continuous 
Wahd ATI NO eeVUREOLUINy. RUA SSH ARN GReUREaR ahcearsbsnesnciaeraesuiice, | LhiAlasHeuhaner: 
ce’. Carpal area behind plantar pad thickly hairy, carpal pads 
represented by a single rounded eminence on the outer side, 
as in the Canidew and Felidae, and sometimes by a smaller 
one as well on the inner side ; rhinarium approximately as 
in Tremarctos. 
«. Pads large as in the preceding genera; sole of hind foot 
behind the plantar pad naked, except sometimes for an 
ingrowth of hair internally behind the plantar pad......... Ursus. 
e’. Pads smaller; sole’ of hind foot behind plantar pad over- 
erown with hair except for a small naked flat pad near 
the external border ceanisscbespermcee PLLC Chose 


Melursus, Helarctos, and Thalarctos ave monotypical. T'vrem- 
arctos contains two well-defined species, namely thibetanus and 
ornatus (type), which I cannot distinguish externally by any 
characters of generic value in my opinion. Nevertheless, the 
difference in the smoothness of the integument behind the first 
and fifth digital pads in thibetanus and its hairiness in ornatus is 
very curious. Ursus contains a doubtful number of species and 
subspecies, but I am not acquainted with any external features 


* This genus, or subgenus, is usually defined by the shortness and breadth of the 
skull, smallness of the ears, length of the tongue, etc. ] 


—— 


OF THE CANIDE AND URSID. 94] 


justifying the admission of Danis (type horribilis) and Luarctos 
(type americanus), unless the more backward position of the first 
digit in the fore paw of americanus and the higher position of 
the carpal pad be given generic value—in my opinion, an 
exaggerated view of their importance*. 

As regards the genealogical position of the genera judged from 
their feet, analogy justifies the opinion that the naked-footed 
forms with free digital pads, like Helarctos and Tremarctos, ave 
the more primitive 7. From a stock probably resembling these 
in the particulars named, Melwrsus is specialised on one side by 
the fusion of the digital pads and Ursus on another side by the 
growth of hair over the carpal region. Thalarctos appears to me 
to be nothing but a specialised type of Ursus, adapted for 
swimming and movement on ice, its longer and more powerful 
canine teeth being developed for the seizing and slaying of 
seals. 


* Merriam admits Evarctos as a subgenus of Ursus on account of certain cranial 
and dental differences. Danis, however, appears to be undefinable (Proc. Biol. Soc. 
Wash. x. pp. 65, 83, 1896). 

+ In the bears themselves this view finds support in the scantiness and shortness 
of the hairs clothing the areas behind the digital and carpal pads in the newly-born 
cubs of Thalarctos maritimus and Ursus arctos. 


ON MITOSIS IN ENAMEL CELLS. 943 


EXHIBITIONS AND NOTICES. 


June 9, 1914. 


Prof. E. A. Mincutn, M.A., F.R.S., Vice-President, 
in the Chair. 


The Secrerary read the following report on the additions to 
the Society’s Menagerie during the month of May 1914 :— 


The number of registered additions to the Society’s Menagerie 
during the month of May was 230. Of these 116 were 
acquired by presentation, 36 by purchase, 43 were received on 
deposit, 10 in exchange, and 25 were born in the Gardens. 

The number of departures during the same period, by death 
and removals, was 220. 


Se) 


Amongst the additions special attention may be directed to :-— 


2 Bladder-nosed Seals (Cystophora cristata) 3 2, from Green- 
land, purchased on May 18th. 

1 Reindeer (Langifer tarandus) g, born in the Menagerie on 
May 9th. 

6 Long-tailed Bats (Rhinopoma microphyllum), from India, 
new to the Collection, received in exchange on May 12th. 

4 Red-headed Bulltinches (Pyrrhala erythrocephala), from the 
Himalayas, new to the Collection, and 2 Cotton-Teal (Wettopus 
coromandelianus), from India, presented by Alfred Ezra, F.Z.S., 
on May 15th. 

2 Cuvier’s Toucans (Ramphastos cuvieri), from the Upper 
Amazons, purchased on May 12th. 

1 Maximilian’s Parrot (Pionws maaimiliant), from Brazil, and 
2 Petz’s Conures (Conurus canicularis), from Mexico, presented 
by the Marquess of Tavistock, F.Z.8., on May 28th. 

2 Open-bills (Anastomus oscitans), from India, purchased on 
May 20th. 


Mr. J. Tuornron Carrer, F.Z.S., exhibited microphotographs 
showing phases of mitosis in the cells of the enamel organ in 
Dasyurus viverrinus and Trichosurus vulpecula. The demonstra- 
tion of mitosis in the enamel cells has not been recorded 
previously—in fact, little has been published dealing with the 
cytological changes which produce the differentiation of the 
various cells composing an enamel organ. 

In a paper to be submitted to the Society during the next 
session, Mr. Carter deals at length with the cytology of the cells 
of the enamel organ in Mammals, Reptiles, Fishes, ete., in all of 
which abundant evidence of mitosis has been found. 


QAd ON A GAZELLE FROM SENNAR. 


Mr. R. I. Pocock, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.Z.S., Curator of Mammals, 
exhibited on behalf of Major C. P. BrapsHaw an interesting 
example of Sémmering’s Gazelle (G@. semmeringi), shot on the 
Dinder River in Sennar, and mounted by Messrs. Edward 
Gerrard & Sons. The antelope was remarkable for the whiteness 
of its pelage, which showed scarcely a trace of the gazelline tint 
characteristic of the typical form. That the specimen was not 
an albino was shown by the persistence of the typical black 
markings on the face, the black horns and hoofs, and the black 
tuft on the tail. 


NOTICE. 
Euvallentinia nom. n. for Vallentinia Stebbing. 


Mr. Edward 'T. Browne having kindly called my attention to 
the cireumstance that a medusoid genus was named Vallentinia 
by him in 1902, and further that a genus of Copepoda was so 
named by Norman and Scott in 1906 (Crustacea of Devon and 
Cornwall, p. 172), I now propose the new name Huvallentinia for 
the genus of Isopoda which I myself have recently called Vallen- 
tinia (P. Z.8. 1914, p. 351), leaving it to the joint authors to 
propose an alternative name for their genus of Copepoda, unless 
it should prove that the want has been already supplied, either 
intentionally or incidentally, by some other authority. 

(Signed) T. R. R. STesBrNa, 

Ephraim Lodge, 

The Common, 
Tunbridge Wells. 
August, 1914. 


; 
: 


No. 185. 


ABSTRACT OF THE PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON.* 


June 9th, 1914. 


Prof. K. A. Miycuin, M.A., F.R.S., Vice-President, 
in the Chair. 


The Minutes of the last Scientific Meeting were confirmed. 


The Secretary read a Report on the Additions to the Society’s 
Menagerie during the month of May, 1914, 


Mr. J. THonnron Carrer, F.Z.S., exhibited microphotographs 
showing phases of mitosis in the cells of the Enamel Organ in 
Dasyurus viverrinus and Trichosurus vulpecula. The demonstra- 
tion of mitosis in the enamel cells has not been recorded 
previously—in fact, little has been published dealing with the 
cytological changes which produce the differentiation of the 
various cells composing an enamel organ. 

In a paper to be submitted to the Society during the next 
session, Mr, Carter deals at length with the cytology of the cells 
of the enamel organ in Mammals, Reptiles, Fishes, ete., in all of 
which abundant evidence of mitosis has been found. 


Mr. R. I, Pococx, F.R.S., F.L.S8., F.Z.8., Curator of Mammals, 
exhibited on behalf of Major C. P. BrapsHaw an interesting 
example of Sdmmering’s Gazelle (G. semmeringi), shot on the 
Dinder River in Sennar, and mounted by Messrs, Edward 
Gerrard & Sons, The antelope was remarkable for the whiteness 
of its pelage, which showed scarcely a trace of the gazelline tint 
characteristic of the typical form. That the specimen was not 
an albino was shown by the persistence of the typical black 
markings on the face, the black horns and hoofs, and the black 
tuft on the tail, 


* This Abstract is published by the Sceiety at its offices, Zoological Gardeus, 
Regent’s Park, N.W., on the Tuesday following the date of Meeting to which 
it refers. It will be issued, along with the ‘ Proceedings,’ free of extra charge, 
to all Fellows who subscribe to the Publications; but it may be obtained on the 
day of publication at the price of Sixpence, or, if desired, sent post-free for 
the sum of Sia Shillings per annum, payable in adyance. 


46 


Prof. J. Srantey Garprner, M.A., F.R.S., F.Z.S., gave an 
account of a Report on the Fauna of the Monte Bello Islands by 
Mr. P. D. Montague, B.A. 

The islands are briefly described before considering the fauna ; 
they are barren limestone with a limited vegetation and some 
mangroves. There are two indigenous mammals, Lagorchestes 
conspicillatus (Gould) and Isoodon barrowensis Thom. Of the 
twelve land-birds three new forms have been described elsewhere ; 
the reptiles number eleven, one being new, and show a marked 
reduction in size as compared with continental specimens. Of 
insects there are recorded 22 Lepidoptera, 11 Coleoptera, 13 
Hymenoptera, and some Orthoptera, ete. Myriapoda number 9 
species; there is 1 scorpion. 9 fishes from lagoons are named. 

The collections prove conclusively the entire dependence of 
these islands for their fanna on the neighbouring continent. 
Partial depopulations of the islands owing to drought are sug- 
gested, suceeeded by repopulations by means of wind-borne forms 
from the south. 


Three other papers, also dealing with collections made by 
Mr. Montague at the Monte Bello Islands, were received from 
Mr. G. GC. Rossox on Cephalopoda, from Miss M. J. Rarasun 
on Stalk-eyed Crustaceans, and from Mr. Tom IrepaLe on 
Mollusca. 


Dr. W. A. Cunnineton, M.A., F.Z.S., read a paper on the 
parasitic Eucopepoda collected by the Third Tanganyika Expe- 
dition in 1904-1905. The collection consisted of a very small 
number of specimens, these forms being evidently much rarer 
than the Argulide, which are also external parasitic Copepods 
infesting fish. The specimens were referred to the well-known 
fresh-water genus Lerneocera, and belong to two species both 
described as new. One of these, however, differs considerably 
from the more typical members of the genus, and may merit a 
separation from it in the light of further knowledge. A third 
species of Lerneocera, which was taken on a Nile fish and belongs 
to the collections of the British Museum, was also described in 
the paper. 


Dr. F. E. Bepparp, M.A., F.R.S., F.Z.S., Prosector to the 
Society, read a paper containing the description of a new species 


of Avian Cestodes and a further discussion of the paruterine organ 
in Otiditenia. 


Mr. R. I. Pococx, F.R.S., F.LS., F.Z.8., Curator of Mammals, 
read a paper “On the Facial Vibrisse of Mammalia,” and pointed 
out that in all the principal orders of the class, with one or two 
exceptions, the following groups of vibrisse are present in some 
genera :—mystaciale on the upper lip, submental on the chin and 
lower lip, superciliary over the eyes, gonal on the cheeks, and 
interramal on the throat behind the symphysis of the jaw. 


47 


Within the limits of the orders these tufts are present in the 
primitive genera, but more or fewer of them may be lost in the 
more specialised types. This fact, coupled with their prevalence 
in widely different types, points to the arrangement of the 
vibrisse above indicated being exceedingly primitive. The 
different modifications of the vibrisse met with in various orders 
were briefly pointed out. 


A second paper by Mr. Pocock “ On the Feet and other 
External Features of the Canide and Urside,” based like the last 
upon work done in the Society’s Prosectorium, dealt with the 
rhinaria, the facial vibrisse, and the pads and interdigital integu- 
ment of the feet in many of the genera of Canidez and all the 
admitted genera of Urside. In connection with the Canide the 
most interesting results were the discovery of evidence, supplied 
by the feet, of kinship between Cuon and Lycaon, and between 
Otocyon and Vulpes. On the other hand, two of the South 
American fox-like dogs Cerdocyon microtis and Bendalopes: gracilis 
differ widely from each other in the structure of the feet, and 
equally widely from Vulpes and Otocyon. The most aberrant of 
all the dogs in the matter of foot-structure is Speothos (Icticyon), 
which is unique in having the digital pads of the third and 
fourth toes of both front and hind feet united, and in having the 
pollex of the front foot set low down adjacent to the postero- 
internal angle of the main or plantar pad. These differences 
seem to justify the division of the Canide into the two sub- 
families Speothoine and Canine. 

In the Urside four well-marked genera are characterised by 
the structure of the feet, namely, Zhalarctos for maritimus, Ursus 
for arctos and its allies horribilis and americanus, Tremarctos for 
thibetanus, japonicus, ornatus, and malayanus, and Melursus tor 
ursinus. Melursus differs from the rest in having all the digital 
pads united almost to their distal ends. Tremarctos differs from 
Ursus in haying the area behind the main or plantar pad of the 
fore foot quite naked, instead of thickly hairy as in Ursus and 
Thalarctos, and Thalarctos differs from Ursus in having the 
plantar pads wide and short and the area of the sole behind the 
plantar pad of the posterior foot covered with hair except for 
a small lozenge-shaped pad towards its outer border. From 
Tremarctos, malayanus may be eliminated as Helarctos by the 
structure of the rhinarium. All the generic names adopted in 
the paper had been previously proposed, mainly upon cranial and 
dental characters; but the evidence from this source is so un- 
satisfactory that there has been no agreement amongst zoologists 
in their recognition. 


Dr. G. A. Bounznerr, F.B.S., F.Z.8., contributed a paper 
entitled “A Second Collection of Batrachians and Reptiles made 
by Dr. H. G. F. Spurrell, F.Z.S., in the Choco, Colombia,” 


48 


A paper on Procolophon trigoniceps, a Cotylosaurian Reptile 
from South Africa, was received from Mr. D. M. 8. Warson, 
M.Se., F.Z.8. 


Mr. A. W. WartzErs presented a paper on the “‘ Marine Fauna 
of British East Africa and Zanzibar, from Collections made by 
Cyril Crossland, M.A., B.Sc., F.Z.8., in the Years 1901-1902: 
Bryozoa—Cyclostomata, Ctenostomata, and Endoprocta.” 

Out of the twenty-four species from these three groups, four 
are new; and, as the species mentioned are all from 10 fathoms 
or under, it will not occasion surprise that the number of Cyclo- 
stomata is but small. 

Sections of the ovicells of Hntalophora and Jdmonea are figured, 
and stress is again laid on the importance of the ovicells in the 
classification of the Cyclostomata, and it is also thought that 
the primary and early zocecia may give valuable help. The ovi- 
cells and other points indicate that some “ Yntalophora” have 
Diastoporidan characters necessitating separation. General par- 
ticulars are given as to the ovicells of the Cyclostomata. 

It is shown that the rosette-plate of Zoobotryon pellucidum, 
described by Reichert as having a central pore with 8-9 pores 
round it, has only one pore, but that surrounding it there are a 
number of cells, so that there is a rosette of cells instead of 
a rosette of pores. Also the groups of cells in the neighbourhood 
of the rosette-plate have a fairly definite form, changing with the 
species in some cases, thus furnishing specific characters. 

In a note, further proof is brought forward showing that the 
genus Lagenipora Hincks should be retained for a group recently 
included in Cellepora, and Siniopelta Levinsen is a synonym. 
Also the Celleporella Norman is Lagenipora, 


This Meeting closes the Session 1913-1914, The next Meeting 
of the Society for Scientific Business will be held on Tuesday, 
October 27th, 1914, at half-past Frve o’clock p.m. 


The following papers have been received :— 
W. L. Distant. 
eee 


Report on the Rhynchota collected by the Wollaston Ex- 
pedition in Dutch New Guinea. 


49 


T. H. Wiruers, F.G.S. 


A remarkable new Cirripede from the Chalk of Surrey and 
Hertfordshire. 


F, A. Ports, M.A. 


Polycheta from the N.E. Pacific: The Chetopteride. With 
an Account of the Phenomenon of Asexual Reproduction in 
Phyllochetopterus and the Description of Two new Species of 
Chetopteride from the Atlantic. 


F. EH. Bepparp, M.A., D.Sc., F.R.S., F.Z.8. 


Contributions to the Anatomy and Systematic Arrangement 
of the Cestoidea.—XV. On a new Genus and Species of the 
Family Acoleide. 


D. M.S. Watson, M.Sce., F.Z.S. 


(1) A new Fossil Reptile from South Africa. 

(2) Notes on some Carnivorous Therapsids. 

(3) Hunotosaurus africanus Seeley, and the Ancestry of the 
Chelonia. 


E. Heron-Auten, F.L.S., F.G.8., F.R.M.S., and Arraur EHar- 
LAND, F.R.M.S. 


The Foraminifera of the Kerimba Archipelago, Portuguese 
Kast Africa. 


Communications intended for the Scientific Meetings should 
be addressed to 


P. CHALMERS MITCHELL, 
Secretary. 
ZOOLOGICAL Society oF Lonpon, 
ReEGENtT’s Parn, Lonpon, N.W. 
June 16th, 1914, 


‘ 


) 
eae 


ener Meee RS 


, as 1 
Ve haya ss Ry ee: re ee eae ee 
Side. 30s end Meta 2 OGRE 7 
4 Pe f ney Ee coeyree ‘ 
ys Oe ono oo Pree Oe a) a 
a : . wr = 1 eben S =a 
tik: Ae W net SS srt ti 
ay ‘ E 
. ‘ ar ay 
co Meee - 
- 
e ff * . ‘ 
vali nr mies 


rr Paint . rined: 6d oor : — 
; cre a ee Friakh: Wen nif (% 1, Siete 
. SARE 


‘a oa. Mowaianll Pe 


npn vena 


BATHE AN HEY eee 4 alt at aa eee F Sa 
| (Tae ye) eae Ae 


ay ‘ POR Po ho Boh. aco) j 4 Pir lied eter : i ay vsoointgin 


“ a ete. le o. | et ee: Bhs | ; . 


Wid, Mapthstt siigase-? ot aaP Tehank aaah 
of fa 


; Finia theb 4c. ¥TM1 weet wd 
4, voted ae ae 


No. 136. 


ABSTRACT OF THE PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON.* 


Octcber 27th, 1914. 


Prof. E. A. Mixon, M.A., F.R.S., Vice-President, 


in the Chair. 


The Minutes of the last Scientific Meeting were confirmed. 


The Secretary read a Report on the Additions to the Society’s 
Menagerie during the months of June, July, August, and 
September, 1914. 


Mr. R. H. Burne, M.A., V.P.Z.S8., exhibited a number of 
preparations showing some adaptations for the nourishinent of 
the embryos of Hlasmobranchs, 


Mr. R. E. Savacez exhibited two abnormal Herrings, taken by 
trawl in the North Sea. The first specimen had neither pelvic 
fins nor girdle (pelvic bones). ‘Phe usual position of base of fins 
was indicated externally by the presence of the characteristic 
elongated scales. The usual musculature was present internally. 
‘The second specimen lacked the lett pelvic fin and pelvic bone ; 
the musculature was complete. 


Messrs. E. Heron-Auten, F.L.S., F.Z.S., and Arraur Har- 
LAND, F.R.M.S., read a paper on the Horaminifera of the Kerimba 
Archipelago, obtained by Dr. J. J. Simpson in the years 1907-8. 
The area is a new one so far as the Foraminifera are concerned, 
the on’y records in any way approximating to it being the species 
described by d’Orbigny in 1826, by Brady in 1876 and 1884, by 
Mobius in 1880, and by Egger in 1893, from material which was 
collected from adjacent areas to the Hast of Madagascar, and otf 
Mauritius and the Seychelles. 


* This Abstract is published by the Society at its offices, Zoological Gardens, 
Regent's Park, N.W., on the Tuesday following the date of Meetung to which 
it refers. It will be issued, along with the * Proceedings,’ tree of extra charge, 
to all Fellows who subscribe to the Publications; but it may be obtained on the 
day of publication at the price of Sixpence, or, if desired, sent post-free for 
the sum of Sie Shillings per annum, payable in advance, 


52 


The material consisted of fine siftings from dredgings, and 
having but few molluscan fragments and stones the larger 
adherent forms are poorly represented, but 470 species and 
varieties have been identified, including two new genera, and 
28 new species and varieties. The general facies is strikingly 
similar to that characteristic of Australian, Torres Straits, and 
Malay gatherings. The problem of distribution thus raised is 
obscure, the intervening ocean being abyssal, while the species 
now recorded are all shallow-water types. Many of the special- 
ized forms common to these widely separated areas do not 
apparently occur in similar dredgings from intervening coasts 
such as the Red and Arabian Seas. No doubt the Equatorial 
Current, which traverses the Indian Ocean from E. to W. 
and impinges on the African coast in our area, is primarily 
responsible for this phenomenon. 

Among the striking forms described and exhibited were 
Ammodiscus charoides (Jones & Parker), now recorded for the 
first time as a tropical species; Carterina spiculotesta (Carter), 
exhibiting a hitherto unrecorded arrangement of the spicules ; 
Pavonina flabelliformis WOrbigny, originally discovered by 
d’Orbigny in sand from Madagascar in 1826 and lost sight of for 
fifty years; Chrysalidina dimorpha Brady, a rare and beautiful 
Textularian ; Discorbina dimidiata Parker & Jones, and Dis- 
corbina polystomelloides Parker & Jones; Cymbalopora bulloides 
1’ Orbigny, the dual nature of the terminal chamber, being divided 
into a “balloon” and a contained ‘ float” chamber, was des- 
cribed; also the species Cymbalopora millettii Heron-Allen & 
Earland, first recorded from the Malay Archipelago by Mr. F. W. 
Millett. A new record was established for Haddonia torresiensis 
Chapman, hitherto only found in the Torres Straits and the 
Tropical Pacific. 

This paper will be published in the ‘ Transactions.’ 


Mr. T. H. Wirners, F.G.S., described a new Cirripede based 
on a number of disconnected valves from the Chalk of Surrey 
and a complete specimen from the Chalk of Hertfordshire. 
Except for three valves referred to a new species of Scalpellum 
(sens lato), the whole of the material belongs to a remarkable 
new asymmetrical Cirripede which differs from Verrueca in the 
more primitive structure of the valves, in the presence of two 
lower lateral valves on the rostro-carinal side, and in the absence 
of interlocking ribs. This species undoubtedly represents the 
ancestral type from which has arisen the recent group of asym- 
metrival sessile Cirripedes forming the family Verrucide, and in 
its structure clearly shows its origin from the symmetrical 
pedunculate Cirripedes of the family Pollicipedide. It presents 
further evidence that the sessile condition was arrived at inde- 
pendently on several different lines of descent during the evolution 
of the Cirripedia. 


53 
Mr. W. lL. Disrant communicated his report on the Rhyn- 
chota collected by the Wollaston Expedition in Dutch New 
Guinea. 
This paper will be published in the ‘ Transactions.’ 


The next Meeting of the Society for Scientific Business will 
be held on Tuesday, November 10th, 1914, at half-past Five 
o’clock P.m., when the following communications will be made :— 


Lewis BALrour. 


Exhibition of Photographs illustrating the Life-history of 
the Garnet. 


R. I. Pococg, F.RS., F.LS., F.Z.S. 


Lantern exhibition showing the Differences between the 
Pine and Beech Martens. 
F. E. Bepparp, MEA: D.Se., F.R.S., E.Z.8. 
Contributions to the Anatomy and Systematic Arrangement 
of the Cestoide,.— XV. On a new Genus and Species of the 
Family Acoleide. 


Report on the Spiders collected by the British Ornitholo- 
gists’ Union Expedition and the Wollaston Expedition to 
Dutch New Guinea. 


The following papers have been received :— 
F. A. Porrs, M.A. 
Polycheta from the N.E. Pacific: The Cheetopteride. With 
an Account of the Phenomenon of Asexual Reproduction in 


Phayllochetopterus and the Description of Two new Species of 
Cheetopteride from the Atlantic. 


D. M. S. Watson, M.Sce., F.Z.8: 
(1) A new Fossil Reptile from South Africa. 
(2) Notes on some Carnivorous Therapsids. 
(3) Eunotosaurus africanus Seeley, and the Ancestry of the 
Chelonia, 


54 


KATHLEEN HADDEN. 
On the Methods of Feeding and the Mouth-parts of the 
Larva of the Glow-worm (Lampyris noctiluca). 


Gu Stuwanoson, Busy MD Eee 


On Two new Subgenera of Freshwater Entomostraca. 


Wituram Nicout, M.A., D.Sec., M.D.. F.Z.S. 
A new Liver-fluke (Platynosomum acuminatum) from the 
Kestrel. 
Lt.-Col. J. M. Fawcerr. 
Notes on a small Collection of Heterocera made by Mr. W. 
Feather in British East Africa, 1911-12. 
J. F. Gemuityi, M.A., D.Sce., F.Z.S. 
Abnormal Gills in the Starfish, Porania pulvillus O. F. M. 
F. F. Larpiaw, M.A., F.Z.S. 


Contributions to a Study of the Dragonfly Fauna of Borneo. 
Part III. A Collection made on Mount Kina Balu by 
My. Moulton in September and October 1913. 


Communications intended for the Scientific Meetings should 
be addressed to 


P. CHALMERS MITCHELL, 
Secretary. 
ZOOLOGICAL Society or Lonpon, 
Recenv’s Park, Lonpon, N.W. 
November 3rd, 1914. 


No. 1387. 


ABSTRACT OF THE PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON.” 
November 10th, 1914. 


Prof. E. W. MacBripve, M.A., D.Sc., F.R.S., Vice-President, 
in the Chair. 


The Minutes of the last Scientific Meeting were confirmed. 


The Secretary read a Report on the Additions to the Society’s 
Menagerie during the month of October. 


The SrcreTary exhibited a photograph showing Oysters 
eee upon mangroves at Lobito Bay, Portuguese West 
rica. 


Mr. L. H. Jaugs, F.Z.S., communicated some notes upon the 
birth of a Porpoise at the Brighton Aquarium. 


Mr. R. I. Pocock, F.R.S., F.L.S., Curator of Mammals, gave 
an exhibition, illustrated by lantern-slides, showing some un- 
recorded structural differences between the Pine-Marten (J/artes 
martes) and the Beech-Marten (artes foina), and pointed out 
that the two species, apart from the known differences in the 
skull and teeth, may be distinguished by the size of the ears, 
which are broader and longer in J. martes than in JZ. foina, 
and by the dimensions of the pads on the feet, which are con- 
siderably larger and less overgrown with hair in J/, foina than 
in WM. martes. 


* This Abstract is published by the Society at its offices, Zoological Gardens, 
Regent’s Park, N.W., on the Tuesday following the date of Meeting to which 
it refers. It will be issued, along with the ‘ Proceedings,’ free of extra charge, 
to all Fellows who subscribe to the Publications ; but it may be obtained on the 
day of publication at the price of Strpence, or, if desired, sent post-free for 
the sum of Six Shillings per annum, payable in advance, 


56 


Mr. R. H. Burne, M.A., V.P.Z.S., exhibited some paraffin 
Simulacra of Molluscan and other shells made accidentally by 
Dr. G. V. Ariens Kappers while embedding objects for the 
microtome. During this process, paraffin in a molten state 
accidentally escaped from the mould and set in the shell-forms 
shown, probably owing to distorted crystallization. 


Dr. F. E. Bepparp, M.A., F.R.S., Prosector to the Society, 
read a paper on the Anatomy and Systematic Arrangement of 
the Cestoidea, in which he described a new genus and species 
of the Family Acoleide, based upon a large number of examples 
obtained from the Canadian Tree-Porcupine (Hrethizon dor- 
satum). 


Mr. H. R. Hoae, M.A., F.Z.8., read his report on the Spiders 
collected by the Wollaston and British Ornithological Union 
Expeditions in Dutch New Guinea. This collection confirms a 
good deal of the work of previous authors, and at the same time 
brings to light much that is new. Leaving out the Attide, there 
are representatives of nine families, comprising twenty-six genera 
(of which one is new) and forty-five species or subspecies of which 
some nineteen are new. Included among the latter are the 
following :— 


CoNOTHELE SPINOSA, Sp. n. 


Differs from C. malayana Dol. in having the front lateral eyes twice as long as the 
rear laterals, the rear median smaller still, and the front median 14 times as broad 
as the rear, instead of all the eyes equal. From C. arboricola Poc. in having the 
first pair of legs longest instead of the fourth, and four teeth only on the outer 
margin of the falx-sheath instead of six. From C. doleschalli Thor. similarly in 
the legs, and the latter has the rear median and side eyes close together. 


SELENOCOSMIA LANCEOLATA, sp. n." 


Differs from S. similis Kule. and A. honesta Hirst, possibly the same, in having 
the patella cum tibia and metatarsus cum tarsus about the same length as, or 
shorter than, the femur and trochanter in the first three pairs of legs instead of much 
longer. The abdomen is paler and the lip and maxille the same colour all over 
instead of being particoloured. 

Length 34 mm. 


PsECHRUS CASTANEUS, Sp. 0. 


Differs from P, argentatus Thor., P. libeltii Kule., and P. annulatus Kule. in 
having the legs longer in proportion, the front pair being more than ten times as 
long as the cephalothorax instead of about eight, in having the front median eyes 
as large as the side instead of smaller, and the rear median eyes more than their 
diameter apart instead of less. It is also only two-thirds the size of the first-named 
and larger than the last. 

Length 17 mm. 


FPECENIA CINEREA, sp. n. 


Differs from F’. swmatrana Kale. in its first pair of legs eight times the length of 
the cephalothorax instead of about six, in the median eye-square broader than long, 
and the rear row distinctly procurved instead of nearly straight. The epigyne also 
differs considerably, though rather near to Mr. Rainbow’s drawing of his F. oblonga 
from the Solomon Islands. 

Length 10 mm. 


57 


ARANEUS FLORIATUS, sp. n, 

Differs from A. pfeifferi Thor. and JA. ferruginea Thor. (‘ Ragni di Selebes, 
pp. 35, 38), besides a more elaborate back pattern, in having the median eye-area 
broader than long instead of longer than broad, and the median eyes distant from 
the side eyes by twice instead of three times their distance between one another, 
also scape of epigyne four times as long as its greatest breadth instead of twice. 

2 females, 1 male. Length 17 mm. 


ARANEUS GRANTI, sp. n. 

Differs from A. vatius Thor. (loc. cit. supra, p. 41), which it rather closely 
resembles, in having the front median eyes their diameter apart instead of much 
more. The sternum is bright cream-colour instead of dark yellow-brown. The 
scape of the epigyne issues from the upper part of the corpus instead of the lower 
margin, is 23 times as long as the width of the corpus instead of twice, and in the 
middle widens to twice its narrowest part above instead of being straight, four times 
instead of twice as long as broad. 

1 female. Length 125 mm. 


LEUCAUGE CAUDATA, Sp. n. 

Differs from Araneus caudifer Kule., which it rather resembles, in its smaller 
size, the,legs only half as long, its colouring silvery imstead of reddish brown, the 
year median eyes half their diameter apart instead of more than their diameter, so 
that the area of the median eyes is narrowest instead of widest posteriorly. ‘The 
epigyne has a bulbous base, wanting in the other, but a shorter scape. 

Length 8 mm. 


REGILLUS DIVERGENS, sp. n. 


Differs from R. asper Camb. in its larger size, the eyes of the rear row slightly 
recurved instead of straight, equidistant instead of median nearer together than they 
are from the side, thus forming with the front median eyes a square instead of 
trapezium narrowest posteriorly. 

Length 12 mm. 


OLIOS PRINCEPS, sp. n. 

Cephalothorax chestnut-red with pale red-brown bristles and hair. Abdomen 
pale yellow-brown with faint median and branching stripes of a darker colour, short 
longitudinal flecks of the same on the sides merging into longer underneath to form 
a shield-shaped pattern, above and just below the genital fold dark brown, on the 
latter a streak of white. Mandibles, lip, and maxille black-brown; sternum bright 
red, legs and palpi bright red-brown with brown hairs, that on the coxe black- 
brown. Vulva a broad chitinous horseshoe-frame, widely open at the base, the 
hollowed inner area indistinctly divided by a median longitudinal fovea. 

1 female. Length 23 mm. 


OLIOS ACTHON, sp. n. 

Differs from Olios salacius L. K. in having the median eyes of the rear row 
(which is slightly procurved) distinctly farther apart than they are from the front 
median. The sternum bright yellow with eight black hair-spots ranged round just 
inside the margin instead of brownish yellow with white hair-stripes, pattern on 
underside of abdomen like Olios (Het.) diana L. K. Five large teeth and one 
smaller on the inner falx-margin and two on the outer, instead of three and one 
respectively. The palp is furnished with a spiral of ten turns round the usual drum. 
It is also rather smaller. 

1lmale. Length 133 mm. 


PALYSTES DASYURINUS, sp. n. 

Differs from P. ignicomus L. K. in having ten white hair-spots on black shield 
on underside of the abdomen, front median eyes their diameter apart and half that 
distance from the laterals, three large teeth and one rather smaller on inner margin 
of falx-sheath, one large between two smaller on outer—a single, long, curved bristle 
on upper inner margin of falx. 

lfemale. Length 25 mm. 


HETEROPODA VENATORIA Linn., var. PLURIDENTATA, Noy. 


Differs from usual form in having five large teeth and one smaller on inner 
margin of falx-sheath, one medium-sized and two smaller on outer margin. 
2 females. 


58 


EXOPALYSTES, gen. nov. 


Intermediate between the groups Delenee and Heteropodew, but near Palystes 
L. K., differing therefrom in having the front median eyes as large as the side eyes, 
the eyes of the front row larger than those of the rear row, the eyes all sessile and 
the clypeus about twice as broad as a front median eye. The cephalothorax, highest 
in the posterior one-third, sloping to the front, and a thick fringe of long bristles on 
the upper inner margin of falx instead of one single bristle. 


EXoPALYSTES PULCHELLA, sp. n. 

Pale yellow with white hair all over, except underside of femora i. and ii, which 
is dark grey. Here and under the tibia of the same pairs a thick mat of long 
yvecumbent cylindrical bristles on the anterior two-thirds of the joints. 

1 female. Length 18 mm. 


The next Meeting of the Society for Scientific Business will 
be held on Tuesday, November 24th, 1914, at half-past Five 
o'clock P.m., when the following communications will be made :— 


EXHIBITIONS AND NOTICES. 


EK. Heron-Axen, F.L.S., F.Z.8., and Arruur HARLAND, F.R.M.S. 


Exhibition of Tests of Arenaceous Foraminifera to introduce 
a Discussion on the Interpretation of these Structures. 


D. M.S. Watson, M.S8ce., F.Z.S. 


(1) A new Fossil Reptile from South Africa. 
(2) Notes on some Carnivorous Therapsids. 


(3) Hunotosaurus africanus Seeley, and the Ancestry of the 
Chelonia. 


A, Ports, M.A. 
Polycheta from the N.E. Pacific: The Chetopteride. With 
an Account of the Phenomenon of Asexual! Reproduction in 


Phyllochetopterus and the Description of Two new Species of © 
Cheetopteride from the Atlantic. ; 


59 
The following papers have been received :— 


KATHLEEN HADDEN. 


On the Methods of Feeding and the Mouth-parts of the 
Larva of the Glow-worm (Lampyris noctiluca). 


G. Srewarpson Brapy, M.D., LL.D., F.R.S., C.M.Z.8. 


On Two new Subgenera of Freshwater Entomostraca. 


Wattram Nicout, M.A., D.Sc. M-D., F.ZS. 
A new Liver-Fluke from the Kestrel. 


Lt.-Col. J. M. Fawcett. 


Notes on a small Collection of Heterocera made by Mr. W. 
Feather in British East Africa, 1911-12. 


J. F, Gemuiut, M.A., D.Sc., F.Z.8. 


—————EE ane 


(1) Abnormal Gills in the Starfish, Porania pulvillus O. F. M. 
(2) On the Ciliation of Asterids, and on the Question of 
Ciliary Nutrition in Certain Species. 


F. F. Larpiaw, M.A., F.Z.8. 


ss = 
Contributions to a Study of the Dragonfly Fauna of Borneo. 
—Part ITI. A Collection made on Mount Kina Balu by 
Mr. Moulton in September and October 1913. 


E. G. Boutencer, F.Z.S. 


On a Colubrid Snake (Xenodon) with a vertically movable 
Maxillary Bone. 


Communications intended for the Scientific Meetings should 
be addressed to 


P. CHALMERS MITCHELL, 
Secretary. 


ZooLoGIcAL Society oF Lonpon, 
Recent’s ParK, Lonpon, N.W. 
November 17th, 1914. 


The : vy bt ef ; 
7 auttinan Bi qulan 


ie “io roe ' if 


. i @ ¥ 
a ee i= pat kee 
. ma we — a my een ® 


- 


wat ot aa ee 


alt ‘iT HM iY at 


Tous a oe = 


ae coe oe er ’ \ $ 2. Hera Yes 4 an 


OLS ute. Ae ee 


pat gamma ao ey pe emg er é 


’ Seg hut velal? Lan mve Gy A 
vet yp! hae : ah v ig eo i: ie 
we wok a bs 


ra 


' ch Te iene 


ce ein 0a lis: Nt im ineeing eae 


min 

6 

aes re ; . (1 ee 
yi ‘ i} ‘ lee ta: ot 2 


ts, 2a eine 


No. 188. 


ABSTRACT OF THE PROCEEDINGS 
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON.* 


November 24th, 1914. 


Prof. E. A. Mincury, M.A., F.R.S., Vice-President, in the Chair. 


The Minutes of the last Scientific Meeting were confirmed. 


Dr. R. Broom, C.M.Z.S., exhibited the skull of a new type of 
Thecodont Reptile from the Upper Permian Beds of South Africa, 
and a number of skulls of Zrichosurus vulpecula, Phascolarctus 
cinereus, Chrysochloris hottentota, and C’. asiatica, illustrating 
dental variations. 


Mr. D. Seru-Smitu, F.Z.S., Curator of Birds, exhibited an egg 
of the New Guinea Rifle-bird (Ptilorhis intercedens), which had 
been laid in the Society’s Gardens in July last, the first instance 
of any species of Paradise-Bird laying in the Gardens. 


Mr. E. T. Newron, F.R.S., F.Z.S., exhibited a series of bones 
of animals showing indications of natural repair, and a number 
of teeth of a female Sperm- Whale (Physeter macrocephalus). 


Dr. C. W. Anprews, F.R.S., F.Z.8., gave an account of three 
papers by Mr. D. M.S. Watson. 

The first paper contained the description of a new reptile from 
the Permian of the Cape Province, 8. Africa, which Mr. Watson 
regards as derived from a Cotylosaurian ancestor and as perhaps 
related to Areoscelis and the modern lizards. A new genus is 


* This Abstract is published by the Society at its offices, Zoological Gardens, 
Regent's Park, N.W., on the Tuesday following the date of Meeting to which 
it refers. It will be issued, along with the ‘ Proceedings,’ free of extra charge, 
to all Fellows who subscribe to the Publications ; but it may be obtained on the 
day of publication at the price of Sixpence, or, if desired, sent post-free for 
the sum of Stix Shillings per annum, payable in advance. 


62 


founded for the reception of the so-called ‘ Proterosaurus 
hualeyi.” 

In the second paper the origin of the Chelonia is discussed, 
and a number of reasons given for supposing that they may be 
descended from some such form as Hunotosaurus africanus 
Seeley. 

In the third paper Mr. Watson describes the skulls of Bauria, 
Microgomphodon, and Sesamodon, and discusses the relation of 
the group with the Cynognathids. He also describes a new 
skull of Lycosuchus, in which both the prevomers and vomer are 
present. 


Mr. F. A. Porrs, M.A., communicated a paper entitled 
“ Polycheta from the N.E. Pacific: The Chetopteride. With 
an Account of the Phenomenon of Asexual Reproduction in 
Phyllochetopterus and the Description of Two new Species of 
Chetopteride from the Atlantic.” 

The new species of Phyllochetopterus was found in branched 
tubes, each usually containing several individuals. The origin of 
these colonies each from a single individual is suggested by the 
frequent occurrence of worms in various stages of regeneration. 
An examination of these shows that autotomy first occurs in the 
middle region of the animal’s body, and a complete animal is 
regenerated from each of the two parts. ‘This phenomenon 
appears to be characteristic also of another new species of this 
genus from Plymouth, which lives in small colonies in branched 
tubes. 

Several points in the morphology of the Cheetopteride are also 
discussed. 


Messrs. E. Heron-Axten, F.L.S., F.Z.S., and Artaur HARLAND, 
F.R.M.S., exhibited a series of microscopic preparations and 
photographic views of the tests of Arenaceous Foraminifera, and 
utged their view that these afforded evidence of purpose and 
intelligence on the part of the Foraminifera. 

An interesting discussion followed, in which, amongst others, 
Sir H. H. Howorth, F.R.S., Sir E. Ray Lankester, F.R.S., and 
the Secretary took part. 


63 


The next Meeting of the Society for Scientific Business will 
be held on Tuesday, February 9th, 1915, at half-past Five 
o’clock p.m. ‘The Agenda for this Meeting will be circulated early 
in January. 


The following papers have been received :— 


KATHLEEN HADDON. 


On the Methods of Feeding and the Mouth-parts of the 
Larva of the Glow-worm (Lampyris noctiluca). 


G. _STEWARDSON Brapy, M. D., LL. iDY5 1 R. Se C. M. ZS. 


On T ‘wo new Subgenera, ie Dives iawrnere ison Ae. 


A new Liver-Fluke from the Kestrel. 


Lt.-Col. J. M. Fawcerrt. 


Notes on a small Collection of Heterocera made by Mr. W. 
Feather in British Hast Africa, 1911-12. 


(1) Abnormal Gills in the Starfish, Porania pulvillus O. F. M. 
(2) On the Ciliation of Asterids, and on the Question of 
Ciliary Nutrition in Certain Species. 


F. F. Larpriaw, M.A., F.Z.8. 


Contributions to a Study of the Dragonfly Fauna of Borneo. 
—Part II. A Collection made on Mount Kina Balu by 
Mr. Moulton in September and October 1913. 


E. G. BouLencsr, F.Z.8. 


On a Colubrid Snake (XYenodon) with a vertically movable 
Maxillary Bone. 


RowtAnn H. TurNER. 


Descriptions of New Fossorial Wasps from Australia, 


Communications intended for the Ss 
be addressed to oat 
P, CHALMERS MITC 


- * 


ZOOLOGICAL Society or Lonpon, ° 
Recent’s Park, Lonpon, N.W. 
December 1st, 1914, 


38. 


39. 


40. 


41. 


42. 


43. 


44, 


45. 


Papers (continued), 


Cephalopoda from the Monte Bello Islands. By G.O. Rossoy, B.A. (Text-figure 1.) 
Description of a new Lizard from the Canary Islands. By Dr. Pu. Lmurs. ......... 


The Mechanism of Suction in the Potato Capsid Bug, Lygus pabulinus Linn. By 
P. R. Awarr, B.A. (Cantab.), D.I.C. (Lond.), Sir John Wolfe-Barry Research Scholar, 
Imperial College of Science, London. (Text-figures 1-29.) 


Se ere Pee ese sen teen eese 


Procolophon trigoniceps, a Cotylosaurian Reptile from South Africa. By D. M.S. 


Watson, M.Sce., F.Z.S., Lecturer on Vertebrate Paleontology in University College, 
ondon. (Plates ILE and Poxt-mgures tO.) isis. va veins esgic pelecieecoss ches 
The Deinocephalia, an Order of Mammal-like Reptiles. By D. M.S. Watson, M.Sc., 
F.Z.8., Lecturer on Vertebrate Palzeontology in University College, London. (Plates 
Vee AG neat ferns al Gale ehare aie tater oye da sia Wo era's vlelerel ei auve.a © a7 a Waln i tie sare oom 


Diagnoses of New Genera and Species of Zonitide from Equatorial Africa. By H. B. 
RESTO Nes HZ Satan (Cll vie syle bes) Rar aratetrarehcr ccrcticveke't;ercveisie|e, cree ou wis tei a'e ateiehelani ciawiwieroe 
On a second Collection of Batrachians and Reptiles made by Dr. H. G. F. Spurrell, 
F.Z.8., in the Choco, Colombia. By G. A. Bounznenur, F.R.S., F.Z.8. (Plates 
PECL T Seo crsucretercrersteleie ees ays Brere tr eE Mere agate Sr ate ots (eee OU or ctasola ate, 5 Pe etal ei avere: wsilac ets 


Zoological Results of the Third Tanganyika Expedition, conducted by Dr. W. A. 
Cunnington, 1904-1905.—Report on.the Parasitic Eucopepoda. By Wruiam A. 


' Cunnineton, M.A., Ph.D., F.Z.8. (Plate I., and Text-figure 1.) .......... 0.0000 


46. 


Ae 


48, 


49. 


The Marine Fauna of British East Africa and Zanzibar, from Collections made by 
Cyril Crossland, M.A., B.Sce., F.Z.S., in the Years 1901-1902. Bryozoa—Cyclo- 
stomata, Otenostomata, and Endoprocta. By Arruur Wm. Waters, F.L.S., F.G.S, 
(latest Vian dallont streaney Uy \eeinitcrerars/stefsicle eisl vies s| olelelel cove sjale«'ociehels 2/3 etalevale oe 


Contributions to the Anatomy and Systematic Arrangement of the Cestoidea.— 
XIV. On a new Species of Rhabdometra, and on the Paruterine organ in Otiditenia. 
By Frank H. Bupparp, M.A., D.Sc., F.R.S., F.Z.S., Prosector to the Society. (Text- 
MOTOS USM icneopeconicsobo ey do deigs ome OS TIDO BOUND DOOUOE a OG uEmEmn uD contion oc 


On the Facial Vibrisse of Mammalia. By R. I. Pocock, F.RS., F.LS., F.Z.S., 
@urator of Mammals (Rex nemrestl—19.)) sce c ed eee eet ev cv dbeee ee adanne 


On the Feet and other External Features of the Canidz and Urside. By R. 1. Pococr, 
F.R.S., F.L.S., F.Z.8., Curator of Mammals (Text-figures 1-13.) ..........+- coee 


Page 


677 


681 


685 


813 


819 


831 


859° 


889 


pds} 
jot 
) 


LIST OF PLATES, 


1914, Parr III. (pp. 491-94). 


a 


H IXLEY <= Pl. 7 
Seah II } Courting-habits of Podiceps cristatus ..... 
Parkins : Ply el: Structural characters of Paralastor Sat 
Monraaun: Phe 
Ratipun : Pl. | Crustacea from the Monte Bello Islands . 
Watson: ‘nd Ope f ors: sé 
II. | Procolophon trigonicepS ....+4.eeeereee: 
iBHE, Fae 
Warson: ded lage AM 
WV: 
PRESTON: PL ees ade 


Bounencer: _ Pl. I. 1. Atelopus spurrelli, 2, inptccblophane 
intermedius. 3. Polychrus spurrelli ... 
II. 1. Leptophis brevior. 2. Homalocrani 


Cunsincron: Pl 1. 1-8. Lerneocera diceracephala, 4-7. L. ha 
plocephala. 8,9. L. temnocephala... 
Waters: I; ° : 


ah aoe from Zanzibar......00..5. 


ay: 


NOTICE. 


so that the es reference i is now P. Z. 8. 1914, Dp. " fei 


is as follows :— Ln af 
~ Part Tsasenedl in March. 


ty he See ys Ons! | : fash 
» III. ,, September, — 
TV. - 


» 


is dt cea 


a 


PROCEEDINGS 


OF THE 


GENERAL MEETINGS FOR SCIENTIFIC BUSINESS 


OF THE 


‘ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY 


OF LONDON. 
1914. 


PART IV: 


containine Paces 945 to 1077, witH 9 PLATES, 


36 Tuxt-ricuREs, TiITLEPAGE, INDEX, ETC. 


oy 
DECEMBER (i FEB 25 1915 


PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY, 
SOLD AT uae HOUSE IN REGENT’S PARK. 
LONDON : 


MESSRS. eee NS, GREEN, AND CO., 
PATERNOSTER ROW. 


Slay ab | 
Sse mN 


Se) a ! 
[Price Twelve Shillings. | aes 
= aes = p20 


LIST: OF CONTESTS 


1914, Part LV. (pp. 945-1077). 


EXHIBITIONS AND NOTICES. 


Page 
The Secrerary. Report on the Additions to the Society's Menagerie during the months 
of June, July, August, and September, 1914 ...--.-e.see cece cece cence ee eeeees 1057 
Mr. R. H. Burne, M.A., V.P.Z.S. Exhibition of some adaptations for the nourishment of 
embryos of Elasmobranchs 2... ..s0scnercsoeecs cere eeeens ee stseucss oeumee oniue 1059 
Mr. R. E. Savace, Exhibition of two abnormal Herrings .....-....--..-+...e+eeeees 1060 
Messrs. E. Heroy-Auten, F.LS., F.Z.S., and Artuur Earuanp, F.R.M.S, Notice of 
Report on the Foraminifera of the Kerimba Archipelago, obtained by Dr. J. J. 
Sinmipson in the years 1907-6 2... nce se ccieg se ec awiseist sivas ng sy ae nee ee ++» 1060 
Mr. W. L. Distanr. Notice of Report on the Rhynchota collected by the Wollaston 
Expedition in Dutch New Guinea ............-+ sees ona weed sia ses 5: get ate coe 
The Sscrerary, Report on the Additions to the Society's Menagerie during the month 
Of Oebober VOLS 2 o.2 scine sieistarcin saln's Silos ono aalisle es lwinigip ate epee eeeees 1060 
The Secretary. Exhibition of a photograph of Oysters growing upon mangroves at 
Hobito. Bay, Portuguese" Weestiatriea:jctec <> .0l< s-1aiaiaieleiev seein jo earn Seo) ole ee ana 1061 
Mr. R. H. Burne, M.A., V.P.Z.S. Exhibition of Simulacra of Molluscan Shells ....... » L061 
Mr. H. R. Hoge, M.A., F.Z.8. Notice of Report on the Spiders collected by the British 
Ornithologists’ Union and Wollaston Expeditions in Dutch New Guinea .......... 1061 


Mr. Lewis H. James, B.A.,F.Z.8. Notes on the birth of a Porpoise at Brighton Aquarium. 1061 


Mr. R. I. Pococs, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.Z.8., Curator of Mammals. Exhibition showing new 
points of difference between Pine and Beech Martens, (Text-figures 1-4.) ........ 1062 


Mr. E. T. Nzwron, F.R.S., F.Z.S. Exhibition of bones of animals showing indications of 
natural repair, and some teeth of a female Physeter ...........0.0000es ‘sietendeneeanes . 1069 


Messrs. E. Heroy-Aurey, F.L.S., F.Z.S., and Arruur Earuanp, F.R.M.S. Exhibitionand _ 


Discussion on “ Purpose” and “Intelligence” in the Foraminifera ..............-- 1069. 


Contents continued on page 3 of Wrapper. — 


ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON: 


Turs Society was founded in 1826 by Sir Sramrorp RaFFLEs, 
Mr. J. Sasrve, Mr. N. A. Vicors, and other eminent Naturalists, 
for the advancement of Zoology and Animal Physiology, and for the 
introduction of new and curious subjects of the Animal Kingdom, 


and was incorporated by Royal Charter in 1829. 


instit 


v t lg 
Dy 


e 


Patron. 
HIS MAJESTY THE KING. 


COUNCIL. 
HIS GRACE THE DUKE OF BEDFORD, K.G., F.R.S., President. 


Ricuarp H. Burne, Esa., M.A., 
Vice-President. 

Aurrep H. Cocks, Ese., M.A. 

Tor Rr. Hon. Tor Earn or 


Cromer, EC. -G.C.B., 
G.C.M.G., K.C.S.1., F.R:S., 


E. G. B. Mrapr-Watpo, Esa. 


Prormssor Epwarp A. Minceiy, 
M.A., F.R.S., Vice-President. j 


P. Costmers Mrrenent, Ese., 
MAL, D.Sc. LL:D., FRS.; 


Vice-President. 

F. G. Dawrrey Drewrtt, Esa., 
M.A., M.D. 

Crartes Drummonn, Kse., 
Treasurer. 

Turn Eart oF Dunmors, V.C., 
M.V.O. 

Sir WarteR Roper Lawrence, 
Br., G.C.LE., Vice-President. 


Ervest W. MacBrinz, Esa., 
M.A., D.Sc., F.R.S., Vace- 
President, 


Secretary. 
W. RB. Oeitvir-Grant, Ese. 
Aubert Pam, Esa. 
Appian D. W. Pottocg, Ese. 
Tur Eart oF PorrsmoutTH. 
Tur Maravess or Srico, F.S.A. 
Oxtprietp Tuomas, Esa., F.R.S. 
Antuony H. WrnGFIzLD, Hse. 


Henry Woopwarp, Kse., LL.D. 
F.R.S., Vice-President. 


9 


a 


The Society consists of Fellows, and Honorary, Foreign, and 
Corresponding Members, elected according to the By-Laws. It 
carries out the objects of its foundation by means of the collection 
of living animals, by its Library, and by its Scientific Publications. 


The Office of the Society, Regent’s Park, N.W., where all com- 
munications should be sent, addressed to ‘* The Secretary,” is open 
from Ten till Five, except on Saturdays, when it closes at One p.m. 


The Library, under the superintendence of Mr. Henry G. J. Peavot, 
is open daily (except Sunday) from Ten a.m. till Five p.m.; on 
Saturdays, Ten a.m. till Two p.m. 

‘he Library is closed from Good Friday to Easter Monday, and 
upon all other Bank Holidays. It is also closed annually for 
cleaning purposes during the whole month of September. 

The Meetings of the Society for General Business are held in the 
Meeting Room at the Society’s Office on the third Wednesday in 
every month of the year, except in September and Octeber, at half- 
past Four o’clock p.m. 

The Meetings for Scientific Business are held in the Meeting 
Room at the Society’s Office fortnightly on Tuesdays, except in 
July, August, September, and December and January, at half-past 
Five o’clock p.m. 

The Anniversary Meeting is held on the 29th. of April, or the 
nearest convenient day, at Four p.m. 

The Society’s Gardens are open daily from Nine o’clock until 
Sunset. Mr. R. I. Pocock, F.R.S., F.LS., is the resident Super- 
intendent and Curator of Mammals, Mr. D. Seth-Smith is Curator 
of Birds and Inspector of Works, Mr. E. G. Boulenger is Curator 
of Reptiles, and Prof. H. M. Lefroy is Curator of Insects. 
The Prosectorium for Anatomical and Pathological work is under 
the charge of Mr. Frank E. Beddard, M.A., D.&c., F.R.S., Prosector, 
assisted by Mr. H. G. Piimmer, F.R.S., M.R.C.S., Pathologist to 
the Society. 


TERMS FOR THE ADMISSION OF FELLOWS. 

Frenrows pay an Admission Fee of £5, and an Annual Contri- 
bution of £3, due on the Ist. of January, and payable in advance, 
or a Composition of £45 in heu thereof; the whole payment, 
including the Admission Fee, being £50. 

No person can become a Frtztow until the Admission Fee and 
first Annual Subscription have been paid, or the annual payments 
have been compounded for. 


Frtiows elected in November and December are not liable for 
the Subscription for the year in which they are elected. 


ey) 


PRIVILEGES OF FELLOWS. 


Fettows haye Personal Admission to the Gardens upon signing 
their names in the book at the entrance gate, and may introduce 
Two Companions daily. 


The Wire or Houszanp of a Futiow can exercise these privileges 
in the absence of the Fellow. 


Until further notice, Frtrows will receive 40 undated Green 
Cards, available on any Sunday or week-day up to the end of 
February of the year following the year of issue, and 20 White 
Cards available on any week-day up to the same date. Twenty 
of the Green Cards may be exchanged for a book containing two 
Orders for each Sunday in the year. Twenty White Cards may 
be exchanged for a book of dated Saturday Orders, each Order 
available for any day except Sunday in the week ending with the 
Saturday for which it is dated. Special children’s tickets will no 
longer be issued, but the Green and White Cards will be perforated, 
and each half will be valid for a Child under twelve years of age. 
It is particularly requested that Fellows will sign every ticket before 
it goes out of their possession. Unsigned tickets are not available. 


Fettows are not allowed to pass in friends on their written 
order or on presentation of their visiting cards. 


Ferttows have the privilege of receiving the Society’s ordinary 
Publications issued during the year upon payment of an additional 
Subscription of One Guinea. This Subscription is due upon the 
1st. of January, and must be paid before the day of the Anniversary 
Meeting, after which the privilege lapses. Fxrtiows are likewise 
entitled to purchase these Publications at 25 per cent. less than 
the price charged to the public. A further reduction of 25 per 
cent. is also made upon all purchases of Publications issued prior 
to 1881, if above the value of Five Pounds. 


Fettows also have the privilege of subscribing to the Annual 
Volume of ‘ The Zoological Record, which gives a list of the Works 
and Publications relating to Zoology in each year, for the sum of 
One Pound Ten Shillings. Separate divisions of volumes 39 to 
42 can also be supplied. Full particulars of these publications can 
be had on application to the Secretary. 


Fettows may obtain a Transreraste Ivory Ticker admitting 
two persons, available throughout the whole period of Fellowship, 
on payment of Ten Pounds in one sum. A second similar ticket 
may be obtained on payment of a further sum of Twenty Pounds. 


+ 


Any Fetxow who intends to be absent from the United Kingdom 
during the space of at least one year, may, upon giving to the 
Secretary notice in writing, have his or her name placed upon the 
“ dormant list,” and will then be called upon to pay an annual 
subscription of £1 only during such absence, but after three years 
must make a further application to be retained on that list. 


Any Fettow, having paid all fees due to the Society, is at liberty 
to withdraw his or her name upon giving notice in writing to the 
Secretary. 

Ladies or Gentlemen wishing to become Fellows of the Society 
are requested to communicate with “The Secretary.” 


P. CHALMERS MITCHELL, 


Secretary. 
Regent’s Park, London, N.W. 
December, 1914. 
MEETINGS 
OF THE 
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON 
FOR 


SCIENTIFIC BUSINE Ss: 


1915. 

TuESDAY, FEBRUARY ...... 9 and 238. 
Bye ENUM Hin ons ca) sceuc,0°2 9 4, -2or 
= APRIL ed mene 
x WON SRE Oe ee ea Diss, Deve 
af RUNGE Ree res. 8 


The Chair will be taken at half-past Five o’clock precisely. 


AVOEOG IOC SOCIETY OF LONDON. 


LIST OF PUBLICATIONS. 


Tue scientific publications of the Zoological Society of London 
are of two kinds—“ Proceedings,” published in an octavo 
form, and ‘‘ Transactions,” in quarto. 

According to the present arrangements, the “ Proceedings”’ 
contain not only notices of all business transacted at the scien- 
tific meetings, but also all the papers read at such meetings 
and recommended to be published in the “‘ Proceedings” by 
the Committee of Publication.. A large number of coloured 
plates and engravings are issued in the volumes of the 
“ Proceedings,” to illustrate the new or otherwise remark- 
able species of animals described therem. Amongst such 
illustrations, figures of the new or rare species acquired in a 
living state for the Society's Gardens are often given. 

The “ Proceedings” for each year are issued in four parts, 
paged consecutively, during the months of March, June, 
September, and December. From January 1901 they have 
been issued as two half-yearly volumes, indexed separately. 

An “ Abstract of the Proceedings ”’ 1s published by the 
Society on the Tuesday following the date of the Scientific 
Meeting to whichit reters. It is issued along with the “ Pro- 
ceedings,” free of extra charge, to all Fellows who subscribe to 
the Publications, but it may be obtained on the day of publi- 
cation at the price of Sixpence, or, if desired, sent post free 
for the sum of Six Shillings per annum, payable in advance. 

The “ Transactions” contain such of the communications 
made to the Scientific Meetings of the Society as, on account of 
the nature of the plates required to illustrate them, are better 
adapted for publication in the quarto form. They are issued 
at irregular intervals. 

Fellows and Corresponding Members, upon payment of 
a Subscription of One Guinea before the day of tye Anni- 
versary Meeting, are entitled to receive the Society’s 
Publications for the year. They are likewise entitled to 
purchase the Publications of the Society at 26 per cent. less 
than the price charged to the Public. A further reduction 
of 25 per cent. is made upon purchases of Publications 
issued prior to 1881, if they exceed the value of Five 
Pounds. 

Fellows also have the privilege of subscribing to the 
Zoological Record for a sum of One Pound Ten Shillings 
(which includes cost of delivery), payable on the Ist. of July 
in each year; but this privilege is forfeited unless the 
subscription be paid before the 1st. of December following. 

The following is a complete list of the publications of the 
Society already issued. 


TRANSACTIONS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON 


4to. 19 vols. and Index. Price to Price to the 


Fellows, Public. 
Vols. I-IV. (out of print). 


Vol. V., containing 67 Plates.. (1862-66) .... 5 4 6 19 
3 VL, 4 2 yee a USCD=G0), Cor ealelaeees 15 0 
Pee Liles + 73 sp, we LBC9= 72) 2 ame 13 12 
be VALLE, rs 82 gp tae (AB72-74) 9 ae eS 12 Il 
” Sy ” 99 29 (18/95-77) 12 1 16 2 
i c i 95 39+, oe AISAT—70) ee LOO . Loge 

Index, Vole (2K. Wa aoe aa (1833-79) .... at : 10 

Vol. XI., containing 97 Plates .. (1880-85) .... 12 . 12 16 
iin? 4 BEE 5 65 se as (AEBO=DOW Face 8 4 
she OAR BES _ 62 yl es (Leo Oo) aries 8 im 
et GN % 47 pe SO6- Ue) ie mer 5 0 
5 Meee, ¥ 52 Paar Rett fom 1901) a 15 14 


KWOOCOK NONI ®D oo © 
DOWWWADSDSOHOCODAGOHOWOCOAwWAWoow 
HoHwanntaaMHeNwc 
CO OO He 
Soo sSoooocesooococecoeceoseococooc ] 


Seo, ia, ieee ame oe OOO T= ana 8 

PPP NeN sles cs Al 5, «« (1908-1906) % > 18 5 18 

a> Gg 8 i) Pe mie) ») ae (C1907 19 eee J : 

wad. an 24 i ee (1909-19 LON a . 13 12 

sie ek — Dart, (Pls: T—-V.).. (eb: Lota yee 18 4 
» 2 (Pls: VI-XV.) (April 1912)... 5 0 
8. (Pls XV LX LL. Beh, 191: 3). 2 10 
Vf A Pls) XX DV XX VIL ae 9 12 
» o (Pls. XX VILT-XXX.) y(Mazohi914) 9 12 
,, 6. (Pl. XXXI.) (March 1914) .. 3 Pe 5 
a (eal ee. @.8o.41 1s XXXII )(May1914) 7 10 
Fy veda, Wary LOA) od io aes) win eee ene 2 3 
55 pn aONaa TOTA Rn a ar 2 3 
Flos (Sune WOU) 345s eee 2 3 
= dite (Pl RX) (Nov: 190A) fi 10 
», 12. (Pls. XXXV.-XXXVII_.)(Nov.1914)9 12 


In consequence of a re-arrangement of the stock of the ‘Transactions,’ the Society is 
#now able to offer for sale, at the reduced price of £50, sets of Vols. V—XVE. inclusive, and 
A eoanate papers, of which a list can be supplied, at. about one-fourth their published price. 


PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMMITTEE OF SCIENCE AND 
CORRESPONDENCE OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF 
LONDON. 8vo. 2 vols. (Letterpress only), Price te Price tor 


Fellows. Public. 
Part I. 1830-31. 1 vol. 8vo., out of print. 
jell eae PP he oes teatitn ohctes eoaat As. (G0. isn tate 


PROCEEDINGS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON. 
First Serius. 
Parts I-XV. (1833-1847). 8vo. 15 vols. (Letterpress only.) Price to 
Fellows : 4s. 6d. each part ; to the Public, 6s. 
Index 1830-1847. Price to Fellows: 4s. 6d. ; to the Public, 6s. 
Parts I., VIL-IX., XL, XIV., XV., out of print. 


/ 


SEcoNnD SuExiEs. 
Parts XVI.-XXVIII. (1848-1860). 8vo. 13 vols. (Letterpress only.) 
Price to Fellows: 4s. 6d. each part ; to the Public, 6s. 
Index 1848-1860. Price to Feliows: 4s. 6d.; to the Public, Gs. 


The Parts of this series containing Coloured Plates are out of print. 


PROCEEDINGS OF THE SCIENTIFIC MEETINGS OF THE 
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON. 8vo. 40 vols. and 4 Indices. 


Letterpress only. With Plates uncoloured. With Plates coloured. 

Price to Price to the Price to Price to the Price to Price to the 

Fellows. Publie. Fellows. Public. Fellows. Public, 
ASG 450 Ode wae ae OSM er Qs. AVE. FID ASIN Asa Base Ode eeOSSii 
EGO Rie As Odes Osa ener 9s. FS RLS ee er 3 Sak) Cy SMe 45s. 
TGR RR GWE o ga dg OSs oo oda Qs. Pelee LOS ALN yar aS OTe emer orneatE 
SCAN ey disk GU seereaen Osan en OSs Pee LOS ONE OOSHLO Res mela ee OSs 
Was 4 As (so wlae GSaesevens 9s. ee Ost) i aon ake ana eLo) Se 
NAA oo 2 Ge gobo Mia casos 9s. Be ee LOSE ame ele BS, OM, conn AES 
ESOTy a MCR came tecoierotomeritevonek Qs, 5 eI Se eg HS To ET CYAeler a iiah 45s. 
SG Sis Weep ener nareneesiececioins Qs. RR LOS ae ae Bie CM ooao 4S, 
MSGi: Nee Sean et Mol, Ur tees Cucu a lls Qs. binren IOI peunninue iets Oly paeet away 7 U5yo. 
AS 7 Olde eae aera ea es oats cic fepeloncbeusns Qs. pte ty NSIS ReS ee aees roo VIS Meeueaeney ely, 
ImndexssUSGEUSAON yore caste ese Abs, Gh sooo 6s. 
ALS 7AM ict ee oan, babe demuiate cute sicher 9s See ae 3s. 9d. 453 
TU EE Bc to RS 9s 12s... 5 OBS G66 coon 4OR7 
TSMC aiie, onen Aimee seer Re a 9s 1st e 5 oom SH soon 4158 
WS Ae ee ears etc Si tasntatbkeuar ste 9s Sasha 36s 48s. 
Mey aoe RRO AAR PR TRE TERY FA REIS, re 9s ell Sis ie 36s 48s 
TSA See aia cee res RR a itr 9s 12s. 36s 48s. 
YAR R ete sie cuir tr hae SRR 9s 1s, 36s 48s 
WAS hira erect seated daurecee eases utaaeacies 9s gs erate 368 48s 
TUSSHAS as cette air, Mita tae ee uae ae a 9s, Rea See eae neu OS! Joa 488: 
LESSON Nan Bane oe oye 9s. Bee hss a arc caren OOS: 2 en ASS! 
lnidexe el Sl SCOM ie yams eos Al. Gah ns 's 6s. 
TRAST Seek aah ac ere rt ee eee 9s, Bei LOS eae ne: 36s. bose Chek 
SOO RPA eaten epee ee cies tae rehce heneue 9s, ns: 36s 48s. 
i Retetevonh on hncray ents pee enIC tee acaba reac ECE 9s 5 Ws 368 48s. 
Bee ea tei UY aN seme ctreatee cds, yi io 9s 5 UBS 36s 48s 
AUN USTED aL is eet clase eee Qs g Ps 36s 48s 
ISS Ger. Ree cee aay ORR 9s Smalls: 36s 48s 
MISS Zoek Na eis aed verano metered. 9s boss 36s 48s 
ASS Rr sats cts ne eee eco e e avereeare 9s. PaeceD el boat aie See gee Loy Aone ake: 
SSO leis t0 SUM eee emer aerer eer eee 9s. MRR CIOS Nay perso rated OSs RA oss 
USS (ics Dies a sR cra te a tare ay 9s. PAG Ty As] os conee wala 36s. sooo Ghee 
Index. ISSlUSOO yy vary-tie oral ASS OOse el OS 
ES ON ie ait RAE ee RIG ay Soe rae Stara ecaicn ry stepePerace eileen 36s. Seo Ul 
SOD ere Ay ee een Wap ciucmetenee Ns ara deacon aye eta ayeh ci otenase 36s. Benn ceehy 
TPSXO RS SR rerun accra yee to pei eM Ae 36s. aS 
OIE OVAN A sa 0 Ra merit pA Meee ce Se Salyichnas Seer Nou oer 1G GBS cS: 
TUES F558 ee RIM otter gk EEA ESE AS 8 a eee CU Rr RE OD eA 36s. soon ake, 
ASO GB Neale ae OR NOE Ree Ee ciire otis Sriceenetan crete: etceiievrer ore ta 36s. soon hse, 
TICKOY Astana eminem. Mires Date ie ala ae da EO APT ROR ec 36s. vores 
SOBER el OF) EAL Shey PARMAR Leas ieUn arabe) auichtettellSiigcal or exe abet abe 36s. Saag Uh. 
HOO) Moe iss ELE. Sp ROHR a Rntey atin PUL ia sey eo REY ice 2abEg Pee 36s. dora ss 
IG aes een cata iicrn anid o6 to. Chae Oe ORONO Ne Deeecuor tani 36s. Baton tery 
itidex: 1S91=1900 sierra AG Gthnono os 

* No perfect copies in stock, t Out of print. 


PROCEEDINGS or tar GENERAL MEETINGS ror SCIENTIFIC 
BUSINESS or tue ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON. 
Svo. 28 vols. and Index. 


Price to Price to the 
Fellows. Public. 

OOD, Vols Te. ics ae ts tie or oe cine Sk ee oi eee B55, yn. va temeene 
Bs i le RNA m Onn unto poo mon C5 65.9 400% SS eiaeaeene 24s. 
ACS) 0) ee wan Seeeire ae ieee resign) Sc. o-co To OCr IETS 2-c 30-05.9.5 Osi coc crepes 
iLL. oi etetare ube uaudl ee Ushars fee unceele yee fee aos. 0 eae 18s. . 24s 
MOOS! pe UA oo ot ce etna opens lel a> yee eee Lesher 24s 
5 Bal MU a cid dehnr eels agelelchedeipieke sie at enema» “ken lohan. 25 
OO eA te oetae 1 crrraitterete leteleratetty + ota 2a. os Cee 18s. ee 24s. 
ys STUN A role cite vane Wenciclis epee! ser einy =: 00> > Sia) ae LSS econ 24s 
VOOD se De souks icyatatoeictet Rees! ousian s)e1ktn/e\> <i +o) 0 = (ehela eee MSs, «5.2 eee 
ele eels UG eed Ar ice po ARRAS ceo co a LSS: Sees 
TGC Re eather! Reina Giane crn Sn Sicko ioeNe Rae eRe ea fi)“ cer PD TBS) eee 24s, 
BP ANDi oe pk rae ieeate en ebene Gis =) 6 ole si oink 183. 2.3. ees 
SiGe nulla o Geen 6 5A tart OC MeIrOR ares os 0 18s.) oi. 4 ores 
een some eetern A etcye cfcweie cis Rin sis <0 n's 0 ae celine 18s, . 2: ue 
MOOS Hi pea ly. ceeds dete yews tele ela rctee oe 0 roe ec a oe ee LSS.) 07S cee 
LT etre eats ose Gite cose halls. sSelstetweee een ne Wes faoaa5 Sls 

” 9) Q ie = 
MOODR Ren Metaatetteloptrtayane hl = ic saison > oe Peeio ols le eee ot UBS) Sree 24s. 
fs Ne TOR ote Mars sta asks «safe leis ati.» + se yetel ane L838) Fo eee 
TICs Ae Se ats gee nC Cac rs oo 18s. 245 
ID aes gre era S oc oa OC CE MRE eGo cS OOO 18s. 24s 
Index, 1901 HII eS AGinto rth si cine ReeRIR Eo rec G © ATI io ¢ 43. Gds 555 OS 
NOTA, Toll ee ened eine rates ct setae Injana os wee oo Alene Ste ems Cm Ra 18s. 248 
PUD Lik Rene eye (ce-%e Foficins ole Miele lee, wls's #0) 396s n oe alg 18s, 24s 
Ear teen Mewes, cfese lotic acievapsis\snls(a-eietafe Sue. ofere «5 6 te ialettiy eee 18s“ .coeee 24s 
3 Mele yes eree Sie vets We tele iol ais Sis ole Gal's ests >, a meee eee a 1337. Meee 24s 
JIQUG 2 Ol Caled thc 0 Roh eet aoe Ie a hs eS i&s. 245 
Mee cancels Spee IMeinta lo kaj nse foa trate e020. >= 2a se er 18s. 24s 
OMA oer eR areclteateisiediaterete «sce gies iss = 2/e'> okivi> ane ee 18s. 24s 
Fe dane a lkeligey atv aseeee iatreiai aleyercieis 6 = /vileccie’ 1s + -eletetehe iaeeienemeaael liSs> Seer 245 


LISTS OF THE ANIMALS IN THE SOCIETY’S GARDENS. 


List of the Vertebrated Animals now or lately Living in the Gardens 
of the Zoological Society of London, (Highth Edition.) 8vo. 
1883. Cloth, 4s. 6d. 

List of the Vertebrated Animals now or lately Living in the Gardens 
of the Zoological Society of London. (Ninth Edition.) 8vo, 
1896. Cloth, 6s. 


CATALOGUE OF THE LIBRARY « of the » Zoologia Society of 
London (Fifth Edition.) vo. 1902. Cloth, 6s. 


THE OFFICIAL ILLUSTRATED GARDEN GUIDE—1 2th Edition 
—with (1) a Railway and Street Map, showing a direct 
route to the ‘“‘ Zoo” from all parts of London and the Suburbs ; 
(2) a Plan of the Grounds, showing at a glance the location of 
the animals; (8) a short description of some of the principal 
animals in the Collection (now containing over 3000 spe- . 
cimens), together with 50 Photographic Illustrations and 
Index. Price 6d. in Stiff Paper Cover, postage 14d., or in 
Green Cloth Cover price 1s. 2d. post free. 


P. CHALMERS MITCHELL, 
Secretary. 
Regent's Park, London, N.W. 
December, 1914. 


These publications may be obtained at the Socrery's OFrFIcn, 
or through any bookseller. 


AVOLOGICAE SOCIETY OF LONDON: 


THE ZOOLOGICAL RECORD. 


THE object of the Zootogicat Recorp is to give, by means of an 

annual Volume, complete lists of the Works and Publications 
relating to Zoology in all its branches that have appeared duripg 
the year preceding the issue of the Volume, together with full 
information as to the points they deal with, arranged in such a 
manner as to serve as an Index to the literature of Zoology in all 
parts of the globe, and thus to form a repertory that wall retain its 
value for the Student in future years, 

The * Zoological Record’ having been amalgamated with the 
International Catalogue of Scientific Literature, Zoology, volumes 
from 43 onwards can now be obtained only from Messrs. Harrison 
& Sons, except when purchasing complete sets from the Zoological 
Society. 

Under the scheme of amalgamation, Fellows of the Society, and 
Institutions already on the subscription-list, have the privilege of 
subscribing at the old rate of 30s. per annum, which coyers the 
cost of carriage of the volume. The subscription becomes due on 
July Ist. in each year, and lapses if not paid by the 1st. cf December 
following. 

The Society is able to supply complete sets of the Record on the 
following terms :— ae pee 

Vols. 1 to 42, price £16 10s. net. Vol. 43 and onwards at 40s. each. 

The prices for separate volumes are as follows :— 

Vols. 1 to 42 (except Vols. 4 and 6 which are sold with sets only) 10s. 

The price of the ‘Zoological Record, Vol. 43 and subsequent volumes, 
obtainable separately only from Messrs. Harrison and Co., is 4Us. 
each. 

Index Zoologicus, An alphabetical list of names of genera 
and subgenera proposed for use in Zoology, as recorded in the 
‘Zoological Record,’ 1380-1960; together with other names not 
included in the ‘ Nomenclator Zoologicus’ of 8S. H. Scudder. Com- 
piled (for the Zoological Society of London) by Cuartes Owen 
Warernouse and edited by Davip Suarp, Editor of the ‘ Zoological 
Record.’ London, 1902. Price to Fellows, 18s.; price to the 
public, 20s., or if sold with a set of the ‘ Zoological Record,’ 10s. 


Index Zoologicus, No II. An alphabetical list of names of 
genera and subgenera proposed for use in Zoology, as recorded in 
the ‘ Zoological Record,’ Vols. 38-47 inclusive (1901-1910), and 
the Zoology volumes of the ‘ International Catalogue of Scientific 
Literature,’ Annual Issues 1-10. Compiled (for the Zoological 
Society of London) by Cuarces Owen Warernovss, I.S.0., and 
edited by Davin Suarp, M.A., F.R.S., Editor of the * Zoological 
Record.’ London, 1912. Price to Fellows, 12s. 6d. net; price 
ro the public, 15s. net., or if sold with a set of the ‘ Zoological 
Record,’ 10s. 

Divisions of Vols. 39 to 42 of the ‘ Zoological Record’ can be 
supplied by the Society, but those of Vol. 43 onwards can be had only 
of Messrs. Harrison & Sons, 46 St. Martin’s Lane, W.C. 


ee Ok 


iw 


SEPARATE DIVISIONS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL RECORD. 


Divisions of the ‘Zoological Record,’ Vols. 39-42, containing 
the literature of the years 1902-1905, may be obtained separately 


as follows :— 


List of abbreviations of journals, ete. 2 ‘ net. 
Special Records, viz. :— 

I. Generai Subjects .. 2 es ees 

IJ. Mammalia 2 NG ee 

Ill. Aves ba, eae Oy Oe 

TY. Reptilia and Batrachia.. iO gies 

V. Pisces ae Vey 

VI. Tunicata Lie Dare 

VIL. Mollusea 4 Qe! 
VII. Brachiopoda .. Oe 

IX. Bryozoa 1-0. 

X. Crustacea a & tae 

XI. Arachnida 2.00) ote 

XII. Myriopoda LL BGr 
XIII. Insecta .. Matar ie eps 
XIV. Echinoderma ot 65. 
XV. Vermes . oOo. 
XVI. Coelenterata .. Lie G78 
XVII. Spongiz 2 OGuy 
XVIII. Protozoa 2) Ores. 
Index of new names of genera and subgenera. 2 0 ,, 


Divisions from Vol. 43 onwards are now supplied by Messrs. 
Harrison & Sous, 46 St. Martin’s Lane, London, W.C. 
P, CHALMERS MITCHELL, 
Secretary. 


Receni s Park, Lonpon, N,W. 
December, 1914. 


PZ. o. A914) WLS Se ee 


Photo, H.G.Hermng. 


Bale & Danielsson, 


LSS ISSLOWAISIRON Wain eive. 
10-12. SCALPELLUM VIMINEUM. 


ON A REMARKABLE NEW CIRRIPEDE. 945 


PAPERS. 


50. A remarkable new Cirripede from the Chalk of Surre 
I Ng 


and Hertfordshire. By THomas H. Wiruers, F.G.S.* 
[Received May 27, 1914: Read October 27, 1914.] 


(Plate I.¢ and Text-figure 1.) 


INDEX. Page - 
DnGrocu cho nme een eer ct en Meee dA oe ed eee apk OAS 
SUIPDKCH TOURS ON? JEVAOAA POMC cen aceaseensinenees eobbadesd seebacacaneel i a Fal0 
Evolution of the Verrucide ............. 951 
Distribution (Geological), Cretaceous at Tivelens ere 
verruca, Scalpellum (sensu lato) .....0.........00.2..... 946, 952 
Proverruca vineulum, gen. et sp. 0. ......... 946 
Proverruca compared with Verruca fail. Calantivn 
(Scaliiclieras) lteter eA oleae: 950) 
Seal pellumwiminreumer SP. Ws... 122 sectecce see eeseee-te--s.au--- 902 


Among some Cirripede remains recently collected from the 
Chalk of | Surrey are a number of isolated valves, which, together 
with a remarkably complete specimen of the same species from 
the Chalk of Watford, Hertfordshire, throw much light on the 
evolution of the sessile Cirripedes of the family Verrucide. They 
constitute, in fact, the ‘“ missing link” between the pedunculate 
Cirripedes of the family Pollicipedide and the sessile asym- 
metrical Cirripedes of the family Verrucide. 

The valves from Surrey were obtained by me from a mass of 
unusually soft Chalk found by Mr. C. P. Chatwin in the Slines 
Oak Pit, Worms Heath, near Woldingham, and to judge from the 
single example of Alicraster precursor collected from the same 
horizon, the chalk appears to be in the upper part of the zone 
of Micraster cor-testudinarium. This is the zone to which it has 
‘been assigned by Mr. G. W. Young f. 

Much difficulty was experienced in studying these valves, for 
although they were all somewhat similar in external ornament, 
the scuta and terga differed so much in structure that it was 
apparent that more than one species was represented. What was 
evident, however, was that certain of the scuta and terga, appar- 
ently of the same species, were extremely convex tr. ansversely and 
formed a semicircle when placed in position. This fact suggested 
to me the possibility of their belonging to a new form of sessile 
Cirripede, since if the capitulum were completed it would approach 
more closely to radial symmetry than is the case in an ordinary 


* Communicated by Dr. W. T. Carman, F.Z.S. 

+ For explanation of the Plate see p. 953. 

~ 1905. “Phe Chalk Area of North-east Surrey,’ Proc. Geol. Assoc. London, 
vol. xix. p. 208 (pit 127a). 


Proc. Zoou, Soc.—i914, No. LXIV. 64 


946 MR. T. H. WITHERS ON 


pedunculate Cirripede. It was at this stage of my observations 
that I went to examine some Cirripedes at the Museum of Prac- 
tical Geology, and among them noticed a beautifully complete 
example of the species to which most of the isolated valves belong. 
This fine specimen was collected by Mr. J. Rhodes from the 
“ Upper Chalk of Watford Tunnel,” * and was apparently obtained 
from a hollow flint at about the same horizon as the isolated 
valves from Surrey. 

Through the kindness of the Director of the Geological Survey 
and Dr. F. L. Kitchin, I was enabled to borrow this specimen for 
description. 

Although this new Cirripede occupies a position intermediate 
between the Pollicipedide and the Verrucide, I do not think it 
advisable to found a new family for its reception. It will, I 
think, be sufficiently distinguished if it is placed in a new genus, 
and the diagnosis of the family Verrucide extended to include it, 
since, it is undoubtedly a primitive Verrucid. 

The remaining valves, which obviously do not belong to this 
Verrucid, are described as a new species of Scalpellum (sensu 
lato). 


Family VERRUCID# emend. 


Sessile, asymmetrical, box-like* barnacles, in which a scutum, 
tergum, rostrum, and carina, with or without a rostral- and a 
cavinal-latus in addition, are immovably united to form the 
“wall”; the remaining scutum and tergum are movable, and form 
the lid-like top. 


PROVERRUCA, gen. nov. 


Verrucids in which a rostral- and a carinal-latus are present on 
the rostro-carinal side, and in which none of the valves has 
developed interlocking ribs. 


PROVERRUCA VINCULUMYT, sp. n. (PI. I. figs. 1-9; Text- 
fig. 1, C-F.) 


Material.—(1) A single complete individual in which the moy- 
able seutum is somewhat displaced, and the upper portion of the 
rostral-latus broken away. (2) A number of isolated valves 
comprising :—1 fixed scutum (left), 6 fixed terga (5 right and 
1 left), 4 movable scuta (1 right and 3 left), 2 movable terga 
(left), 1 carinal-latus (right), and 2 rostral lateral valves (left). 
There are no isolated examples of the rostrumand carina. Seven 
individuals are represented by these remains. 

Holotype.—The complete specimen (text-fig. 1, C-F), Museum 
of Practical Geology, register number 3204. 

Horizon and locality.— Lower Senonian, Upper part of J. cor- 
testudinarium-zone: Slines Oak Pit, Worms Heath, Woldingham, 
Surrey. ?@Same horizon: Watford Tunnel, Hertfordshire. 

*° 1889. Mem. Geol. Surv., Geology of London, vol. i.p. 77; 1904. Mem. Geol. 


Surv., Cretaceous Rocks, vol. il. p. 232. 
nga 
+ vineulum, a bond. 


A REMARKABLE NEW CIRRIPEDE. 947 


Text-figure 1. 


A. Verruca prisca J. Bosquet. Upper Senonian to Danian: Europe. Rostro- 
carinal view showing the movable opercular valves, which are on the right 


side. 
B. Opposite view of same showing the fixed scutum and tergum. 


C. Proverruca vinculum, gen. et sp.n. Lower Senonian: England. Restoration 
of specimen below (fig. D),and from almost the same position. 


D. Proverruca vinculum, gen. et sp.n. Lower Senonian, ? zone of Micraster cor- 
testudinarium: Watford Tunnel, Hertfordshire. Coll. Mus. Pract. Geol., 
No. 3204. A complete shell in which the movable scutum and tergum are on 
the right side and slightly displaced. The rostral- and the carinal-latus are 
seen, but the rostral-latus has its upper part broken away showing the lateral 
portion of the rostrum below. 


E. Opposite view of same showing the fixed scutum and tergum. 


F. Same specimen viewed from above to show the broadly oval outline of the shell, 
and the semicircular outline formed by the fixed scutum and tergum. 
c., carina; ¢.l., carinal-latus ; 7., rostrum ; 7-./., rostral-latus ; s., movable scutum ; 
s’., fixed scutum ; ¢., movable tergum ; ¢’., fixed tergum. 


All figures * 15 diam. 
64* 


948 : MR. T. H. WITHERS ON 


Measurements.—The complete shell is very minute, its dimen- 
sions being :-— 


Length (from base of rostrum to apex of carina) 2:7 mm. 
“a (from apex 2 - ) 2-1 mm. 
Greatest breadth’ .eceeer 2-2-2: ose ee eee ear 1-7 mm. 
: height (from apex of tergum to base)... 1-6 mm. 


The isolated valves are somewhat larger, and indicate that the 
complete specimen is a young individual. Their dimensions 
are: 

Movable scutum: length (from apex to middle of basal 
margin} 2‘8 mm.; breadth (greatest) 1*2 mm. 

Fixed scutum: length (from apex to middle of basal margin) 
2-7 mm., when complete, ca. 2°9 mm ; length (from apex to rostral 
angle) 3:1 mm. ; breadth (greatest) 2°7 mm. 

Fixed tergum: length 2-4 mm.; breadth 1:7 mm. 


Description of Specimens. 


Although the complete specimen is of great importance as 
showing the relative position of the valves, little can be seen of 
their inner structure. Moreover, the valves are covered exteriorly 
by a film of chalk, or may be a secondary deposit of silica, which 
serves both to obscure and unduly to emphasize the bead-like 
ornament. This is no doubt due to the shell having been pre- 
served in a hollow flint, for preservation in flints is apt, especially 
in highly ornamented forms, to make the ornament more 
pronounced. Owing to its importance it is too dangerous to 
attempt to clean this minute and delicate fossil, and it will have 
to be studied in its present condition. 

The isolated valves vary considerably both in ornament and 
structure, but while there is no doubt as to the identity of the 
fixed and movable scuta and terga, it is not at all certain that 
the rostral- and the carinal-latus belong to this species. In the 
complete specimen the rostral-latus is much broken, and the 
outer structure of this and the carinal-latus somewhat obscured. 
Without being able to disarticulate these valves it is impossible 
to compare them with the supposed isolated examples, of which 
-even the two rostral latera differ from each other. It is pro- 
bable that the variation in ornament is due to varying states of 
preservation. 

Vhe shell is broadly oval in outline, much elevated, the walls 
perpendicular on each side, and the movable scutum and terguim, 
when in position, would be inclined at an angle of about 30° with 
the base; rostrum and carina at either end, the rostrum wider 
than the carina and slightly more developed on the right side, the 
space between the rostrum and carina occupied on one side by 
the fixed scutum and tergum, and on the other by the carinal- 
latus, the rostral-latus for its whole length overlapping the lateral 
portion of the rostrum. 


Valves highly ornamented, the ornament consisting of strong 


A REMARKABLE NEW CIRRIPEDE. 949 


transverse rulges, which, where crossed by the longitudinal ridges, 
are broken up into bead-like prominences. The fixed and the 
movable tergum have this bead-like ornament only on the apico- 
basal ridge, the longitudinal ridges being absent on the remainder 
of the valve. On the movable scutum the longitudinal ridges are 
prominent only near the occludent margin. 

Rostrum widely semiconical, wider than the carina, bowed in- 
wards, its apex not freely projecting, and the lateral portion 
slightly more produced on the rostro-lateral side, on which the 
transverse arrangement of the ornament is pronounced. 

Carina subtriangular, bowed outwards, moderately convex 
ti ‘ansversely, the apex freely projecting ; a short distance from 
the carino-lateral margin and extending from the apex, is a 
prominent longitudinal ridge formed by the valve being folded 
along this line. 

Fixed scutwm (Pl. I. figs. 1a, 6) subtriangular, apex acuminate, 
considerably convex transversely, with a wide submedian fold or 
vidge extending from the apex; on the occludent side of the 
ridge the erowth- lines are upturned, and on the tergal side almost 
straight ; “oceludent and basal margins convex; tergal margin 
concave. On the inner surface a comparatively wide portion of 
the valve near the occludent and tergal margins is marked with 
growth-lines which meet on a raised ridge below the apex ; this 
ridge serves for the reception of the scutal angle of the tergum. 
The pit for the adductor muscle takes up a considerable portion 
of the lower half of the valve. 

Fixed tergum (Pl. I. figs. 4a, 6) subrhomboidal, considerably 
convex transversely, with a flat-topped apico-basal ridge which 
widens gradually downwards, and on this ridge the transverse 
ridges are broken up into small bead-like prominences owing to 
the crossing by the longitudinal ridges; basal margin acutely to 
broadly rounded. On the inner surface the apical portion is 
marked with growth-lines for about one-fourth the extent of 
the valve. 

Lateral valves—The two lateral valves seen in the complete 
specimen from Watford are somewhat broken, and as already 
stated, I am uncertain whether the three isolated valves are 
identical with them, or whether they belong to the species 
described (p. 952) as Scalpellum vimineum, sp.n. The two right 
valves, considered to be rostral-latera, are obliquely triangular in 
shape and considerably convex transversely. One (Pl. I. figs. 
9 a, 6) has the inner surface near the rostral margin marked with 
growth-lines to a greater extent than in the other valve (PI. I. 
fies. 8a, 6). The latter differs also in the direction of the 
transverse ridges on the outer surface, for along a line extending 
from the apex near to the rostral margin, the transverse ridges 
are not continuous but bend abruptly ‘but slightly upwards and 
then downwards to the margin. The right valve, regarded asa 
carinal-latus (PI. I. figs. 7 a, b), is subtriangular in shape and very 
gently convex transversely. On the inner surface the basal 


950 MR. T. H. WITHERS ON 


fourth of the valve only was covered by the corium, the upper 
three-fourths being marked with growth-lines, which indicate 
that the valve freely projected to that extent. 

Movable scutwm (PI. I. figs. 2, 3a, 6) an acute-angled isosceles 
triangle, slightly bowed towards the tergum, but more so away 
from the opposing scutum; basal and tergal margins almost 
straight ; occludent margin convex. On the inner surface a 
narrow portion of the valve along the occludent edge is thickened, 
and a shallow pit for the adductor muscle is situated about the 
middle of the valve. On the tergal side the inner edge is raised, 
and between it andthe outer edge is formed a narrow groove for 
the reception of the tergum. 

Movable tergum (PI. 1. figs. 5 a, b, 6) of an elongate diamond 
shape, almost flat transversely, with a sharp-edged apico-basal 
ridge ; carinal margin formed of two lines making an obtuse 
angle; scutal angle slightly protuberant. 

Affinities of the Genus.—From a phylogenetic standpoint 
Proverruca is by far the most important fossil Cirripede that 
has yet been discovered, for it serves in a most remarkable 
manner to link up the hitherto distinct families Pollicipedide 
and Verrucidee. 

The family Verrucide consists of only the single genus Verruca, 
but the genus includes some 48 species. Of these, two occur in 
the Upper Cretaceous (Upper Senonian and Danian), five are 
confined to Tertiary rocks (Miocene and Pliocene), and there are 
41 recent species, of which one occurs also in the Pliocene. The 
shell of Verruca is very peculiar, since it is quite asymmetrical 
owing to the unequal development of the valves. There are six 
valves, and Darwin* has shown by tracing the development of 
the young shell that they consist on one side of the carina and 
rostrum unequally developed on their two sides, on the other of 
a tergum and scutum most peculiarly modified and immovably 
interlocked to form the ‘ wall” with the rostrum and carina, 
and a scutum and tergum in their normal and movable condition 
forming the top of the shell. Both Darwin tf and Gruvelt have 
shown that at the first period of calcification the valves are 
almost symmetrical, but during the subsequent growth of the 
shell become more and more unequally developed to form the 
asymmetrical shell typical of the Verrucide. It is interesting 
also that it appears to be a matter of chance whether it is the 
right- or left-hand scutum and tergum that are modified to form 
the wall with the rostrum and carina. 

Proverruca is of a much more primitive structure than Verruca, 
and although the valves are disposed to form an asymmetrical 
shell as in Verrwea, with the exception of the inequality in size 
of the fixed and movable scuta and terga, the valves have 


* 1854. Ray Soc. Monogr. Sub-class Cirripedia, Balanide and Verrucide, p. 498. 
1855. Palzont. Soc. Monogr. Foss. Balanide and Verrucidee, p. 41. 

T 1854. Ray Soc. Monogr. Sub-class Cirripedia, Balanidew and Verrucide, p. 497. 

{ 1905. ‘ Monographie des Cirrhipédes ou Thécostracés,’ p. 170. 


A REMARKABLE NEW CIRRIPEDE. 951 


undergone very little modification in structure from an ordinary 
pedunculate Cirripede. The fixed scutum and tergum have a 
greater transverse convexity than in an ordinary pedunculate 
Cirripede, but, unlike those of Verruca, they can be neealy 
identified. ame fact, they prove the correctness of Darwin’s inter- 
pretation of the valves in Verruca as deduced from a study of the 
valves of the young shell. As is shown by the right and left 
movable scuta and terga, it isa feature of both genera that either 
the right or left valves may be developed to torm the “ wall.” 

If we take such a pedunculate Cirripede as is included in the 
sub-genus Scillelepas of the genus Culantica, we see that the 
eapitulum is composed of two whorls of valves, the upper com- 
prising paired scuta and terga, anda carina, the lower whorl 
consisting of three pairs of latera, a rostrum, and a sub-carina. 
There is no upper lateral valve between the scutum and tergum, 
although the median lateral valve may be homologous with the 
valve that becomes an upper lateral valve in the more specialized 
forms of Scalpellum. Now if we imagine the almost equal 
development of the rostrum and carina, and the suppression on 
one side of the lateral valves, the scutum and tergum would be 
allowed to form that side of the wall, and the opposing scutum 
and tergum would have to lean over at a greater angle to meet 
them. We should then have only to suppress the sub-carina, 
the median latus, and the peduncle, to get a form such as 
Proverruca. This was evidently the history of the form, and 
although Scillelepas may not have been the actual ancestor, it 
must have been a form somewhat similar. Proverruca still 
retains the primitive structure of the valves, as is shown by the 
isolated examples, and the two lateral valves, regarded as homo- 
logous with the rostral- and the carinal-latus in the Pollicipedide, 
are two that remain of the three lateral valves. It is of much 
significance that of these two valves only the carinal-latus really 
for ms that part of the wall between the rostrum and carina. 
The rostral-latus overlaps for its whole length the lateral portion 
of the rostrum, and it certainly seems as though with the 
approaching attachment of the lateral portions of the rostrum 
and carina, the two lateral valves were on their way to sup- 
pression. We have only to imagine their absence, the meeting 
of the rostrum and carina, and the development of interlocking 
ribs to strengthen the attachment of the valves, te turn Proverruca 
into a typical Verruca (text-fig. 1, A, B.) 

We see that in the non-attachment of the rostrum and carina, 
the presence of two lateral valves, and in the structure of the fixed 
scutum and tergum, Proverruca is related to the Pollicipedide, 
but more particularly to the genus Calantica Gray. In the 
asymmetry of the shell owing to the unequal development of the 
valves on both sides, and in one of the scuta and terga forming 
the operculum, it is related to Verruca, and it is especially near to 
the recent deep-sea species with elevated shells. Proverruca un- 
doubtedly represents the ancestral type from which has arisen the 


952 MR. T. H. WITHERS ON. 
recent group of asymmetrical sessile Cirripedes forming the 
family Verrucide, and in its structure clearly shows its origin 
from the symmetrical pedunculate forms of the family Polli- 
cipedide. 1t presents further evidence that the sessile condition 
has been arrived at independently on several different lines of 
descent during the evolution of the Cirripedia. The Verrucide 
have a phylogenetic history widely different from that of the 
Balanidee (sensu lato), and evidence is not wanting to show that 
the Balanide also are at least diphyletic. The Chthamaline 
have almost certainly arisen from some such form as Brachylepas, 
while it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to derive the 
Balanine from that source, or indeed from any form as yet 
known. 


Family PoLLICIPEDIDS. 


SCALPELLUM VIMINEUM *, sp.n. (PI. I. figs. 10-12.) 


Diagnosis.—Seutum subtrapezoidal, with no apico-basal ridge, 
the apex rounded, the growth-ridges arranged in concentric lines 


from the apex; occludent margin forming a right angle with the 
basal margin. 

Material.—Portions of a right and a left seutum, and a com- 
plete right tergum which might or might not belong to the 
same species. 

Holotype.—The left scutum (figs. 10 a, 6). 

Horizon and locality Lower Senonian, wpper part of WM. cor- 
testudinarium-zone: Slines Oak Pit, Worms Heath, Wolding- 
ham, Surrey. 

Measurements.—Length of left scutum, 2°9 mm.; length of 
left tergum 1°9 mm., breadth, 1-2 mm. 

Scutum.—The left valve (PI. I. figs. 10 a, 6), which is more nearly 
complete, has the tergo-lateral portion almost entirely broken 
away, and is gently convex transversely. When complete the 
valve was subtrapezoidal in outline, and there is no apico-basal 
ridge. Apex rounded ; basal margin convex, and forming aright 
angle with the lower part of the convex occludent margin. Outer 
surface ornamented with a number of concentric ridges termin- 
ating each zone of growth, and these ridges are broken up into 
bead-like prominences where crossed by the longitudinal ridges. 
The middle portion of the valve has the bead-like prominences 
much more numerous and crowded. A wide portion of the inner 
surface on the occludent side, and so far as preserved on the 
tergal side, is marked with growth-lines which meet on a raised 
ridge below the apex. A deep pit for the adductor muscle is 
situated in the middle of the basal portion of the valve. 

Tergum (Pl. I. figs. 124, 6) subrhomboidal, with a delicate 
apico-basal furrow ; apex slightly curled towards the scutum, 
basal portion narrow and pointed. Upper carinal margin slightly 


* vimineus, made of wicker-work. 


A REMARKABLE NEW CIRRIPEDE. 953 


convex, a little shorter than the lower margin, which is straight ; 
occludent margin extremely short, and the scutal angle much 
rounded and protuberant ; the valve is depressed near the scutal 
angle, and forms a ridge parallel to the margin. Outer surface 
ornamented with delicate transverse ridges. 

Remarks and Comparison with other Species.—These three valves 
were found with those of Proverruca vinculum, already described 
(p. 946), but there is no evidence to show that they belong to 
one individual. The scutum is ornamented like the valves of 
P. vinculum, but it differs so much from the homologous valve of 
that species that I refer it to a new species, and to the genus 
Scalpellum (sensu lato). The small transverse convexity of the 
valve seems to preclude the possibility of its having formed part 
of a shell as is the case in Proverruca, and therefore representing 
a second species of the genus. Its structure renders it more 
probable that it formed part of a capitulum of a pedunculate 
Cirripede of the genus Scalpellum, but further information is 
needed as to the remaining valves before anything more definite 
can be said regarding the relationship of the species. 

The scutum differs from that of Proverruca vinculum, mainly 
in its much less triangular shape, in the occludent and basal 
margins forming an angle of 90° instead of about 45°, and in the 
absence of an apico-basal ridge. The tergum differs chiefly in 
the presence of a delicate apico-basal furrow, instead of a 
prominent ridge. 


My thanks are due to Dr. F. A. Bather, Dr. W. T. Calman, and 
Mr. C. P. Chatwin for help in connexion with this paper. 


EXPLANATION OF THE PLATE. 


Proverruca vinculum, gen. et sp. n. 


Lower Senonian, Upper part of W. cor-testudinariwm-zone: Slines 
Oak Pit, Worms Heath, Woldingham, Surrey. 


. Fixed scutum. a, outer view of left valve; 6, inner view. 

. Movable scutum. Outer view of a comparatively wide left valve. 

. Movable scutum. a, outer view of left valve; 4, inner view. 

. Fixed tergum. a, outer view of left valve; 6, inner view. 

. Movable tergum. a, outer view of left valve with basal portion broken 
away; 6, inner view. 

. Movable tergum. Outer view of smaller but more complete left valve. 

. Carinal-latus. a, outer view of right valve; 4, inner view. 

. Rostral-latus. a, outer view of incomplete left valve ; 6, inner view. 

. Rostral-latus. a, outer view of nearly complete left valve; 6, inner view. 


Fig.. 


Co OC NI OD Ore co bo 


Sealpellum vimineum, sp. n. 


10. Scutum. a, outer view of left valve of which the tergal portion is 
broken away ; 6, inner view. 

11. Scutum. a, outer view of fragment of a right valve (portion near rostral 
angle) with very pronounced ornament; /, inner view. 

12. Tergum. a, outer view of complete right valve; 6, inner view. 


All figures X circa 8 diameters. 


Lad onli 
: wis 


y is + +, re 1 fl bi 


Beit 


Ht Lar ar 


ihenty'? eee, 
d hee EO 


’ » Lanai MAG 
0 fsa ay 


P Z.S. 14 Perrsa: ae 


RS 
© 
Ry 


ny 


~ ier 


Nsiuals 


-- 2063 


Cambridge University Press. 


E.Wilson del. 


Mi SOCHAET © 2 ail US sieAwal Ie 


P Z.S 1914. Peres: Eine 


E.Wilson del. : Cambridge University Press. 
MESOCHAETOPTERUS MINUTA. 


P ZS. WA Potts: Pit 


------ Teun? 


eur 


Diy, mp he 


FAP del. Cambridge University Press. 


MESOCHAETOPTERUS. 


P Z.S.1914. Potts. PLIV. 


ih 
se Q 
oS Soe 


SS 
5 
a A 


Cambridge University Press. 


RAP del. 


PHYLLOCHAETOPTERUS PROLIFICA. 


P. Z.S. 1914. Potts. Pl. V. 


12 


Cambridge University Press. 


PHYLLOCHAETOPTERUS PROLIFICA. 


yy) 
DES Lp t 
WL) Up i ' 
SH) Vimy LU YAMA ARVNSS Wyn. 
Qo ns ECCLES 
DD, : prt 
pe TT LU yD 


Q 
gE SS (de) 
. A om 


‘Cambridge University Press. 


PZ. 8. 1914. Pottss PE VE 


PHYLLOCHAETOPTERUS ANGLICA. 


ON POLYCHAETA FROM THE N.E, PACIFIC. 955 


51. Polycheeta from the N.E. Pacific : The Cheetopteridee. 
With an Account of the Phenomenon of Asexual Repro- 
duction in Phullochetopterus and the Description of Two 
new Species of Cheetopteridee from the Atlantic. By 
F. A. Porrs, M A., Fellow of Trinity Hali, Cambridge, 
and Balfour Student of the University *. 


[Received May 30, 1914; Read November 24, 1914. ] 
(Plates I-—VI.7 and Text-figures 1-13.) 


INDEX. 


Page 
Introduction ......... Raa nsasiaceciae MAL Re GOD 
Diagnosis of Family anal Table of Gane Mek nes eee OOO 
Mesochetopterus, gen. n. 
IDrEeANOSaS Oe Creams Bal INGOTS coooncaanosenoocoscasansueadsonsaugaeod  SETl 
MENGar LOTtuSPeNee -osene Coenen eee ss oe eo aks ean Nae cst t eden OS 
BY Ee DU CORA LD S| Den Oe SRO nae San pod ban ChURE a ee EOrp: Ree ena Eo eee Ce naa ced 963 
The Position of Mesochetopterus in the Family .................. 967 
Telepsavus G. Costa. 
Relepsauussspey ayseey ccc see ence one antics sec dae ee eevaceeniesoy LOOS 
Phyllochetopterus Gr. 
P. prolifica, sp. n. (with an account of asexual reproduction 
in the species) ......... BeoontLE cen 
Some Points in the Woupholosy of ihe hetoptaiias ceAedess 981 
Description of a new Species (P. anglica) from British Waters, 
and a Comparison of those ee. which form True 
Colonies ....... 984, 
Remarks on the Gener anise fopten US serail ep, lnctates 
LCE TULS Mee nee a ae cay ett Mn 7d) 2, Aetna ie thSoklees tesa Meee OOO 
INTRODUCTION. 


The Cheetopterids found in the coastal waters of the Gulf of 
Georgia and Puget Sound, though the species are few in number, 
are very widely distributed and remarkably interesting in their 
biology and morphology. My observations were made on three 
species, all of which appear to be new :— 


Mesochetopterus taylori, gen. et sp. n. 
Phyllochetopterus prolifica, sp. 0. 
Telepsavus sp. 


Of these Mesochetopterus partly bridges the gap between 
the remarkable form Chetopterus and the other members 
of the family. Phyllochetopterus prolifica possesses a type of 
asexual reproduction which is now described for the first time 
in the Polychetat. T'elepsavus is a genus hitherto only known 


* Communicated by the SecRETARY. 

+ For explanation of the Plates see p. 993. 

{ A preliminary note on this phenomenon was published in Rep. Brit. Assoc, 
Ady. Science, 1912, Dundee, p. 513. 


956 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


to occur in the Mediterranean and the Red Sea. In previous 
collections the Chetopterids appear to have been represented 
only by empty tubes, and their interest has remained unsus- 
pected (cf. Johnson, “The Polycheta of the Puget Sound Region,” 
Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. vol. xxix. p. 386). 

The collections, of which the worms described here form a 
part, were made in the summer of 1911, while I was a guest at 
the Biological Laboratory at Departure Bay, Vancouver Island, 
which is “maintained by the Dominion Government. I should 
like to express my heartiest thanks for the hospitality extended 
to me there. The tidings of the death of the Rev. G. W. Taylor, 
the first Director of the Station, reached me here last year (1912), 
and I wish to place on recor d some slight tribute to the memor y 
of one of the pioneers of marine biology i in British Columbia. His 
enthusiasm for the study of the vich fauna of the Pacific Coast, 
and the patient care which he bestowed upon its investigation 
are worthy of great praise. I only knew him in the last year of 
his hfe, during a time when, crippled by paralysis, he suffered 
greatly, but his kindness and thoughtfulness will always remain 
a pleasant memory to me, 

In connection with my work in Canada, I wish, too, to grate- 
fully acknowledge my ‘indebtedness to the Managers of the 
Balfour Fund, who made me a special grant to assist in defraying 
the expenses of the j journey. 

Of the other forms which are described in this paper, J/eso- 
chetopterus minuta was found amongst the collection made by 
Mr. Cyril Crossland in the Cape Verde Islands during July and 
August 1904. I am much obiiged to him for permission to 
describe-this form, and for his kindness in reading through this 
paper: Lastly, the new species of Phyllochetopter us, which I 
have found to be an. inhabitant of British waters, was obtained 
while working at the Laboratory of the Marine’ Biological 
Association at Plymouth in the spring of 1913. 


Family CuatoprerRtp# Audouin and Edwards. 


Polycheeta inhabiting a tube of parchment-like consistency and 
very closely adapted to their tubicolous life. Body divided into 
two, or sometimes three, distinct regions. Prostomiwm small, often 
bearing eyes; peristomium forming a collar, with two tentacles 
more or less developed. The first (anterior) region is composed of 
a small and fairly constant number of segments; of the two 
divisions of the parapodium the notopodium only is developed. 
The segments behind this region have biramous parapodia ; the 
variation of the notopodia here affords the chief method of differ- 
entiating between the genera of the family. Generally two distinct 
types are successively met with in the same animal, thus enabling 
us to distinguish second (median) and third (posterior) regions. 
Throughout the body the notopodia carry capillary sete ; in the 
fourth segment one or more are much stronger and thicker than 


POLYCH ETA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 957 


the rest. Hach neuropodium consists of a double ridge, with several 
rows of uneini. The dorsal surface is greatly flattened in the 
anterior region, and carries a median ciliated groove, which runs 


the whole length of the body in some forms, but is interrupted 
in others. 


Table of Genera. 


(a’) All segments behind anterior region similar. 
(6’) Notopodium of posterior segments unilobed 
(6) Notopodium of posterior segments bilobed 

(a’’) Median and posterior regions both present. 

(c’) Segments im median region with bilobed foliaceous 
notopodia, each carrying several capillary sete. 
(d’) Number of segments in median region variable 
(d’’) Two seements in median region ...... 
(c3) Segments. in median region typically with unilobed 
‘notopodia. Peristomial collar well dev eloped. 
(e’) Median segments two or three in number; noto- 
podia all conical in shape; tentacles long ...... Mesochetopterus. 
(e’’) Median segments five in number ; first with sepa- 
rate aliform notopodia; others with notopodia 
fused to form fans or suckers ; tentacles short... 


AS See eich Ranzania 
Telepsavus. 


Phyllochetopterus. 
Spiochetopterus. 


Chetopterus. 


MESOCHAETOPTERUS, gen. n. 


Chetopterids with a well-developed peristomial collar and « 
pair of long peristomial tentacles. Body divided into three 
regions. The anterior contains 9-13 setigerous segments ; th 
parapodia are represented by short and conical notopodia with 
capillary sete; in the fourth setigerous segment several of the 
dorsal setee are enlarged. The median region is composed of 
2 or 3 elongated segments, forming dorsally a flat region, with 
continuous lateral borders, covered with glandular epitheliwm 
and ornamented with transverse ridges. Typically the noto- 
podia are rather enlarged, conical, and fleshy, with a groove 
running down the inner border; the newropodia are single in 
the first, double in the succeeding segment or segments, and con- 
tain wuneint. The posterior region contains a large number of 
segments similar to those in Cheetopterus, but with much shorter 
notopodia. A dorsal ciliated groove runs from the mouth along 
the median line to the posterior end. In one or more of the 
median segments the lips are enlarged to form a fleshy organ. 

The genus thus agrees with Chetopterus in the reduced number 
and specialised character of the segments of the median region. 


It resembles Phyl/ochetopterus in the continuous ciliated groove 
and the long tentacles. 


Diagnoses of Species of Mesocheetopterus here described. 


M. taylori, sp.n.—A long but slender Mesochetopterus, living in 
a long narrow unbranched tube of opaque parchment, embedded for 
the most part vertically in sand and ending blindly. Prostomiwm 
very small, without eyes, entirely surrounded and hidden by the 
well-developed peristomial collar. The anterior region coniains 9 or 


958 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


10 setigerous segments. The median region is composed of 
3 segments; in all, the notopodia are of the type described in 
the diagnosis of the genus. The posterior region contains @ 
large number (about 60) of segments; the short notopodia each 
with several capillary sete. 

Locality. Pacific coast of North America. 


MM. minuta, sp. n.—A very small slender Mesochetopterus, living 
in tubes of a translucent horny material coated with coarse sand. 
Prostomium large and conical ; peristomial collar well developed, 
but not so complete as in M. taylori. Just external to the tentacles 
is a pair of eyes. The anterior region contains 10-13 segments. 
The median region is composed of 2 segments; the first pair of 
notopodia are small and clavate, the second pair are of the type 
described above for the genus. The ciliated groove is expanded 
into a cup in the middle of the second median segment. The 
posterior region is composed of segments which are double ante- 
riorly, single posteriorly ; each notopodium has a single seta. 


Locality. Cape Verde Islands, Atlantic; Torres Straits, Pacific. 


MESOCH&TOPTERUS TAYLORI, sp.n. (Plates I., ITI., figs. 5, 6, 9; 
Text-figs. 1-5.) 

Occurrence and Habits —This animal was first found in De- 
parture Bay, near Nanaimo, Vancouver Island, on a wide stretch 
of sandy beach, which was partly bare and partly covered with 
beds of Zostera. Over the whole area, from the middle of the 
beach to the lowest tide-mark, there were to be found brown 
tubes about a quarter of an inch in diameter, lined with a brown 
parchment-like material, while the outer layer is membranous 
and coated externally with sand-grains. The tubes, which pro- 
ject very slightly above the surface, are not U-shaped as in 
Chetopterus, but go straight down through the sand generally 
for about eighteen inches. On reaching the shingle underneath 
they sometimes turned and ran horizontally. In one case, where 
especial care was taken to obtain the tube whole and uninjured, 
it was found to end blindly in a neatly rounded apex. The last 

art was much thinner, without the parchment lining. The 
total length of the tube in this case was three feet. It is, as a 
rule, however, very difficult to obtain the entire tube, owing to 
the fact that the sand is deeper in most places and the tube runs 
vertically through its whole extent. But without obtaining the 
whole tube it is almost impossible to examine entire speci- 
mens of its inhabitant, which rapidly retreats to the depths of 
its dwelling as soon as the spade strikes the sand. Most of the 
individuals collected consisted only of the first two regions. 

Later the animal was dredged in two or three fathoms of 
water at Nanoose Bay, and also observed on sandy beaches, 
between tide-marks, at Victoria on the south end of Vancouver 
Island and Olga in the San Juan Archipelago, just over the 


POLYCHEZTA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 959 


International Boundary. It is thus widely distributed in the 
neighbourhood of Puget Sound and the Gulf of Georgia. 

One whole specimen was obtained with the following dimen- 
sions :— 


Length 28:5 em, Width in broadest part 1 em. 
Anterior region with 9 segments 1°8 em. long. 
Median region with 3 segments 4:0 cm. 
Posterior region with 68 segments 22°7 cm. 


This was probably a small individual, since in others measured 
the anterior and median regions exceeded the figures given 
above. 

Mesochetopterus is a longer and much more slender worm than 
Chetopterus variopedatus. The delicacy and transparency of the 
integument, which is so marked a feature of the last-named 
species, is not characteristic of the new genus. The whole 
surface is a creamy white or yellow, relieved by dashes of choco- 
late pigment on the peristomium and tentacles alone. In the 
posterior region the dark green gut shows through the body-wall. 
The ventral musculature is, throughout the body, more developed 
than in Chetopterus. 

The prostomium (PI. I. fig. 3) is a small rounded prominence 
with unpigmented skin. Itis much more distinct than in Cheto- 
pterus. There is no trace of eyes. The peristomiwm forms a 
prominent buccal funnel which entirely surrounds the prostomium. 
It is, however, shallower, with more gently sloping sides than 
in Chetopterus. As mentioned above, there is here a noticeable 
development of the chocolate pigment, which does not dissolve in 
alcohol, and so is retained by the preserved specimens. The 
peristomial tentacles originate just outside the peristomial collar. 
They are stout grooved structures (very extensile in the living 
animal) and measuring, even in their contracted state, 3-4 em. 
They contain a pigment similar to that mentioned above. The 
mouth is situated between the prostomium and the ventral lip 
of the peristomium, and is bordered in some specimens by two 
rounded lips below. 

The anterior region is convex on the ventral side, concave on 
the dorsal. It differs, however, generally from that of Chatopterus, 
firstly in the narrower width and secondly in the shortness of the 
notopodia. In 21 specimens examined, 10 had 9 segments, an 
equal number had 10 segments, and a single individual 11. In 
Chetopterus variopedatus, similarly, though 9 is the typical 
number, Joyeux Laffuie observed indiv iduals with 10, 11, and 
even, in one case, 12 segments. The parapodia of the anterior 
region are all similar and represented by the conical notopodia, 
which increase slightly in size as we pass posteriorly. The 
dorsal curvature is not so distinct as in Chetopterus. ‘The last 
segment does not bear an appendage representing the neuro- 
podium, such as occurs in C. variopedatus (Joyeux Laftuie, 9, 
p. 257, pl. xv. fig. 2) and other species. 


960 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


In the notopodium of Chetopterus there are two long straight 
rows of capillary sete, embedded for the greater part of their 
length in the parapodium, but projecting from the surface for 
short but equal distances. They are all lanceolate in type, but 
the dorsalmost sete differ from the rest in being slender and 
scarcely dilated. This tendency to differential development. is 
greatly exaggerated in the 4th segment. The dorsal sete 
preserve their slender lanceolate character, but a number of 
the ventral sete become short, strong, truncated at their ex- 
tremities, and black in colour. Those situated most ventrally 
present these characters in the highest degree (text-fig. 4 A). 

In Mesochetopierus the sete (Pl. ILI. fig. 9) are more delicate 
than those of Chetopterus, aud have a different arrangement, owing 
to the shortness of the parapodia. They are mostly of a distinct 
lanceolate type and equal in length, but a few of the dorsalmost 
are much longer and more slender, projecting in a ragged tuft 
from the extremity of the neuropodium. ‘They occur in a slightly 
curved row. In the fourth parapodium there is a single line 
making a very pronounced curve. Ventrally there are about 
12 modified setz. 

Median Region.—Though consisting of three segments only, it 
is much longer than the anterior region. In Chetopterus the 
median region is characterised by the transparent nature of the 
body-wall and the reduced width of the segments; here every 
segment is of a uniform width greater than that of the anterior 
region, the dorsal surface is flattened and glandular, and enclosed 
on each side by a continuous border formed by the thin upturned 
edges of the segments (PI. I. fig. 2, fr.), and the ventral muscles 
are much larger and stouter than in Chetopterus. 

When the animal is alive and inside its dwelling the lateral 
borders are approximated so as to form an imperfect tube 
dorsally. Their appearance in text-fig. 1 does not do justice to 
their extent in the living animal. 

The parapodia in Mesochetopterus have not undergone the 
great and diverse modification occurring in Chetopterus (compare 
text-fig. 1, A, B). They resemble very closely those of the abdo- 
minal region and attain a similar development in all three 
segments. The notopodia are short and conical, little larger 
than in the abdomen; they possess an internal skeleton of two 
or three stout capillary sete. They are on the distal surface 
and approximated to the middle line. On the inner surface 
they possess a ciliated groove which meets the median groove. 
T think that there is little doubt that they act as accessory organs 
for the collection of microscopic food, interrupting the dorsal 
channel, and separating food-particles from the current by the 
action of the cilia contained in these grooves. The neuropodia 
are slightly different in the three segments. The ventral surface 
of the anterior region (PI. IIT. fig. 5) is entirely oceupied, as in 
Chetopterus, by a “plastron” (pl.) with a slightly wrinkled 
appearance to the naked eye and composed of high epithelial 


POLYCH ATA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC, 96] 


Text-figure 1. 


A. Chetopterus variopedatus. B. Mesochetopterus taylori. 
Anterior view of median segments. 
al., alimentary canal; cil.gr., dorsal ciliated groove ; fr-, lateral borders ; m2z., 
ventral longitudinal musculature; new., neuropodium ; not., notopodium 
with its acicular setee. 


cells. From this, along the median region, there runs a wedge- 
shaped prolongation (w.), which narrows down in the second 
segment to a median groove. But in the first segment it is 
broad, and the neuropodia are restricted to two narrow lateral 
strips of different appearance. Here, then, each neuropodium 
is a single structure ; in the two succeeding segments the neuro- 
podia are much broader, extending almost to the middle line, 
and are divided into a dorsal and a ventral half, the former being 
slightly smaller and pushea a little forward. Hach contains 
several rows of uncini. There is no indication whatever of the 
fusion of the neuropodia to form a sucker-like median structure, 
which occurs in Chetopterus. A typical uucinus of this region is 
figured in text-figure 3. 

The dorsal surface of the median region is covered by glandular 
epithelium, raised into transverse furrows. ; 


Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No, LXV. 65 


962 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 
Posterior Region (text-fig. 2).—In the one complete animal 
which I obtained this contained 64 segments, a much larger 


number than has ever been observed in Chetopterus (Joyeux 


Text-figure 2, 


not 


A. Chetopterus variopedatus. B. Mesochetopterus taylori. 
To show difference in form of typical segments of the posterior region. 
cir., cirrus-like appendage of the neuropodium. Other lettering as in text-fig. 1. 


Text-figure 3. 


Mesechetopterus taylori. X 325. 


Uncinus from first segment of median region. 


POLYCH&TA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 963 


Laffuie, 9, gives 27— -40). The segments differ from those of the 
median region chiefly in their shorter length. The whole region 
has the appearance of a string of beads, each segment being 
rounded and connected with its fellows only by a narrow neck, 
through which run the intestine and the nerve-cord (PI. ILI. fig. 6). 
The rounded appearance is due to the very much swollen portion 
of the segment which contains the generative organs. The two 
notopodia have coalesced for a considerable ‘part of their length, 
so that the free portions are very short indeed. In them are 
contained several (about 8) capillary setze. The neuropodia con- 
stitute a continuous narrow ridge half encircling the segment ; it 
bears on each side two uncinigerous tori, w hich are, however, by 
no means so well developed and independent as 1s the case in 
Chetopterus. The dorsal torus is a little smaller and placed 
rather more anteriorly. 

‘The small cirrus-like appendage (ci7.) found just outside the 
dorsal torus in Chetopterus is not present in Mesochwtopterus. 


MESOCHZTOPTERUS MINUTA, sp.n. (Plates IT, IIT. figs. 7, 8; 
Text-figs. 4, 5.) 

Occurrence.—This species was found twice by Mr. Cyril Cross- 
land during his visit to the Cape Verde Islands in August and 
September, 1904, once at St. Vincent, and again at Porto Praya. 
On the first occasion tufts of tubes were collected on the shore 
(?amongst sand) at low tide, and on the second tubes which 
contained much larger specimens were found projecting from and 
embedded in masses of nullipores. They were associated with 
Onuphis and a species of Spionid. In November 1913, I found 
this species also at Murray Island, Torres Straits, living in sandy 
tubes between tide-marks. Except for their generally smaller 
size, these Australian individuals conform with the description 
which follows in all essential particulars. 

The animal is milk-white in colour, with no pigmentation, 
except that of the gut shining through posteriorly. None of the 
individuals which reached me was quite complete, but those 
from Porto Praya were about 2°5 em. in length, while those from 
St. Vincent barely exceeded 15cm. In the largest the maximum 
breadth was very little more than 1 mm. 

The prostomium (Pl. Il. fig. 4) is a very distinct feature, better 
developed than in any species of Phyllochetopterus which I have 
been able to examine. It is conical in shape. The peristomiwm 
forms a deep cup like that in JZ. taylori, but not so complete 
owing to the size of the prostomium, and without the considerable 
development of pigment which occurs in the other species. At 
the base of the prostomium come off the two long peristomial 
tentacles. The eyes were only seen in the specimens from Porto 
Praya, in which, however, they were very distinct. They are 
curiously placed on the peristomium just outside the bases of the 
tentacles. 

In the anterior region the number of segments is variable. In 

6o* 


964 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


the two larger individuals from Porto Praya there were 13 or 14 
respectively ; in those from St. Vincent 10 segments in most, 
9 in one or two. ‘The notopodia show differences from those 1n 
the corresponding region of M. taylori, due partly to the great 
difference in size of the two animals. In the Cape Verde species 
there is naturally a very much smaller number of setee in each 
parapodium (about 20 or 30). The setz themselves are easily 
distinguishable from those of JZ. taylori (cf. text-fig. 5) by 
their shorter heads. As in that species so here, dorsally they 
become longer and more slender, with an almost symmetrical 


Text-figure 4. 


y 
a 


—————— 


A 


A. Mesochetopterus taylori, X 70. B. Mesochetopterus minuta, X 325. 


Enlarged setze of fourth segment. 


lanceolate head. The fourth segment (text-fig. 4 B) carries ven- 
trally a number of dark brown modified setz varying from 4 to7. 
The larger ones have a distinct likeness to those of J. taylori, 
though, of course, they are much smaller. There is a tendency 
for the oblique edge of the seta to be fimbriated. This is 
apparently due, not to a natural serration, but to splitting of 
the fibrous chitin of the seta. 

The median region consists of only two segments, but it is 
nearly twice as long as the anterior region. It is the great 
likeness in the configuration of the median region which shows 


POLYCHEZTA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 965 


quite plainly that these two worms from the Atlantic and the 
Pacific must be placed in the same genus. In both the segments 
are broad and flattened, with a glandular dorsal surface raised 
into transverse ridges and traversed by a continuous ciliated 
groove. In both, too, the parapodia are similar, and there is an 
enlargement and incipient modification of the ciliated groove 
to form a cup-shaped organ. ‘There are, of course, minor differ- 
ences, namely, in the development of the notopodia of the first 
segment and in the presence of a rounded lateral border to 
the region without the thin upturned edges which are character- 
istic of W. taylori. 


Text-figure 5. 


A B 


Typical notopodial setze of anterior region. 


A. Mesochetopterus taylori. B. Mesochetopterus minuta. 


The first segment is much longer. The notopodia are even 
less developed than in JZ. taylori—in fact, they are merely clavate 
papille like the second pair of per istomial appendages in Phyllo- 
chetopterus. In the individuals I examined there were two or 
three slender setze embedded almost entirely in the notopodium, 
but projecting very slightly from the surface and ending in a 
slight lanceolate head. 

The neuropodium is a single structure, separated from its 
fellow on the other side by a wedge-shaped prolongation of 
glandular tissue exactly like that described above for J. taylori. 
The uncini contained in the neuropodium are very similar to 


966 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


those of the other species, though much smaller. But they’ 
have six or seven teeth, or very nearly the number which is found 
in WM. taylori. 

The second segment is about two-thirds the length of the 
first. The notopodia of this segment are exactly like those 
described as typical for the genus—conical and enlarged, with a 
groove running down the internal border towards the median 
eroove. It contains a couple ot siender acicular sete, which do 
not project terminally from the parapodium as in the first 
segment and have no distinguishable head. The neuropodia are 
double structures and call for no remark. 

About the middle of this segment there is an enlargement of 
the lips of the ciliated groove rather like those occurring in the 
second and third median segments of I. taylori. Itis exceedingly 
interesting to notice, however, that in some individuals the lips 
approximate posteriorly, and an almost complete circular eup is 
formed like that in the 13th segment of Chetopterus. This is 
a variable character in the species, however—in the individual 
figured here there is no posterior fusion of the lips. But from 
the variations which occur in the genus Mesochaetopterus we can 
undoubtedly see how the accessory feeding-organ in Chetopterus 
has arisen from the ciliated groove. 

The posterior region (Pl. III. figs. 7, 8) is composed of short 
rounded segments. As none of the specimens is complete, I am 
unable to say how many are found. Anteriorly each segment 
is divided into two by a slight constriction. The proximal half 
bears the parapodium. As in J/. taylori, the free part of the 
notopodia projects very slightly from the surface. As a rule, 
they contain a couple of thin acicular sete, sometimes only a 
single one. The neuropodia have the usual double uncinigerous 
torus, the dorsal part being very small. 

The distal half of the segment is the part which in M/. taylori 
is diminished to form the neck between successive segments. 

The two species here described differ extraordinarily in size, 
for while J/. taylori is the largest Chetopterid known, JZ. minuta 
is probably the smallest. I shall have occasion to remark upon 
the great variation which occurs in the development of the 
prostomium in the genus Phyllochetupterus, but in this respect 
these two species differ still more widely. But while WZ. minuta 
resembles many species of Phyllochetopterus in the character of 
the prostomium, the peristomial collar is deeper and _ better 
developed than is ever the case in the latter genus, and the 
second pair of peristomial appendages—which are so character- 
istic of Phyllochetopterus—are, I think, absent here. These two 
circumstances are, I believe, connected. Then, again, the number. 
of segments comprised in the median-region is quite constant, 
but different in the two species—two in J/. minuta, three in 
M. taylorii—and this draws another very definite distinction. 
There are other differences, which I have mentioned above. 
Some of these, ¢. g. number and shape of sete, are partly dependent 


POLYCHHTA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 967. 


upon the differences in size of the animals. Speaking generally, 
however, these two species are far more definitely distinguishable 
than any pair of species in Phyllochetopterus or in Cheetopterus. 

No less interesting than the diversity in form of the two 
species is their curious distribution. While W/. taylori is so far 
only known to oceur in the coastal waters of the N.E. Pacific, 
M. minuta has already proved to have a much more extended 
range. The type-specimens come from the subtropical regions 
of the North Atlantic, but I was surprised to find a Jeso- 
chetopterus of common occurrence in Torres Straits, which is, 
without doubt, identical with JZ. minuta. It will prove, I 
venture to predict, a widely spread Indo-Pacific form, and its 
absence from previous descriptions only illustrates the difficulty 
of obtaining a representative idea of a Polychet fauna from 
general collections. Though J. minuta may be found in the 
Tndian Ocean, it is less likely to turn up in the Red Sea and the 
Mediterranean, where so much attention has been given to the 
obseurer forms of Polychet worms, and the distribution will 
probably remain discontinuous in type. 


The Position of Mesocheetopterus in the Family. 


It can hardly be doubted that a close relationship exists 
between Chetopterus and Mesochetopterus. The structural 
differences between them correspond closely with the different 
kinds of tubes which they occupy. Chetopterus possesses a much 
wider tube, in which it fits very loosely, and it is for this reason 
that the excessive and bizarre modifications of the median region 
have been produced. Adhesive organs are needed to maintain 
the position of the worm in the tube, and these are formed by 
the fusion of the notopodia giving a cup-shaped sucker. Ciliary 
action alone would be too feeble to produce an efficient circulatory 
current in so wide a space, and hence the fans of the 14th—16th 
segments exist. The notopodia of the anterior and posterior 
regions are concerned in the movement of the animal up and 
down in its tube. They must be long enough to touch the walls 
and so attain to much greater dimensions than in Mesocheto- 
pterus. The greater or lesser length of the parapodia causes, as 
we have seen above, some difference in the arrangement of the 
setie. 

Chetopterus possesses, too, a complicated method of feeding, 
which is responsible for further ditferentiation in its external 
structure. This method has been lately described by Enders in 
detail (4). The long aliform notopodia of the 12th segment and 
the dorsal cup of the 13th segment alike aid in separating food 
from the respiratory current, and compacting it into masses 
which are swept forward in the ciliary groove to the mouth. 
The middle region, then, fulfils a double function in promoting 
the circulation of water in the tube and collecting food, different 
segments bemg specialised for each task, In consequence of this 


968 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


division of labour, a number of segments is included in the region, 
larger than in Jesochcetopterus. 

T have not found it possible, in the absence of experimental 
observations, to reach any such clear conclusions as to the 
functions of the different organs of Mesochetopterus. Food is 
partly collected by two long grooved tentacles, which are constantly 
projecting from the mouth of the tube and sweeping over the 
surface of the sand in search of small fry. Enders makes a 
similar observation on another Cheetopterid with long tentacles, 
to which he applies the name Spiochetopterus oculatus? He 
describes it as scraping with its tentacles the sides of the aquarium 
in which it was kept; the diatoms thus dislodged were swept 
up the ciliary grooves of the tentacles into the mouth. Nutritive 
particles are, no doubt, also collected by the action of the cilia of 
the buccal funnel as in Chetopterus, and, lastly, I think, the 
notopodia of the median region have a similar function to those 
of the 12th segment in the above-mentioned worm. A branch 
of the median ciliated groove runs along the inner surface of 
each of them, and in my view such minute organisms as are not 
strained from the circulating sea-water anteriorly are here 
arrested by the parapodia, mixed with mucus secreted by the 
glandular epithelium of the surface and swept into the median 
groove and along to the mouth. 

The ciliated groove in Mesochetopterus, as in Phyllechcetopterus, 
is quite continuous in its course from the head to the tail. The 
primary function of such a groove is to maintain a respiratory 
current through the tube, as is well seen in forms with a trans- 
parent dwelling like Phyllochetopterus prolifica. 

In Chetopterus, owing to the development of the respiratory 
fans, the ciliated groove does not extend farther back than the 
13th segment and has changed its function, being now employed 
in the collection of food. We may well suppose that in Meso- 
cheetopterus the action of the cilia causing a flow of water from 
head to tail is not continuous, but is reversed on occasion to carry 
food back to the mouth. 

Cheetopterus is without doubt the form most specialised in 
structure in the family, and this is shown not only by the modi- 
fications of the median region but also in the discontinuous 
ciliated groove and the shortness of the tentacles. It is impossible 
to agree with Enders, who supposes that the long tentacles of 
Spiochetopterus “have undergone a considerable specialisation ” 
and speaks of the shorter tentacles of Chetopterus as more 
primitive than those of Spiochetopterus. 

The group of Cheetopterids, which includes Ranzania, Phyllo- 
chetopterus, Telepsavus, and Spiochetopterus, ave distinguished by 
possessing long tentacles (the most important organs in procuring 
food) and a complete ciliated groove. A differentiation of the 
median from the posterior region is sometimes not found at all 
(Telepsavus, Ranzania). If it occurs, the number of segments 
in the median region is very variable (in species and even In 


POLYCH HLA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC 969 


individuals), and they differ very little from the abdominal 
segments. But the other two points are, without doubt, primitive 
characters, and the long tentacles (but not the ciliated groove) 
are shared with the Spionids. 

Mesochetopterus forms the connecting-link between these 
primitive forms and the specialised Chetopterus. 

In the possession of long tentacles and a continuous ciliated 
groove it resembles Phyllochetopterus. In the development of a 
very distinct median region composed of a small number of 
segments with grooved notopodia, which possibly assist in the 
collection of food, it comes near to Chetopterus. 


TaLEPsAvus Gabr. Costa. 


Only two species of this genus have been described hitherto: 
these are 7’. costarum Claparéde, from Naples (1), and 7’, bonhouret 
Gravier, from Djibouti in the Red Sea (5). 


TrLEpsavus sp. (Text-figs. 6-8.) 

Though this Polycheet is a very common and widely distributed 
member of the beach fauna of British Columbia, my collection 
contains only one specimen which is at all well preserved, and in 
this the head is incomplete. Such individuals as were preserved 
in their tubes were quite worthless, owing to the impermeability 
of the material, which thus differs from that formed by Phyzllo- 
chetopterus considerably more than their appearance seems to 
show. The following account of the species is thus very incom- 
plete, and I refrain from giving a name until the species can be 
better defined. I should also like to state my opinion that the 
validity of Gravier’s species is questionable until an actual 
comparison of the Mediterranean and Red Sea forms is made. 

Occurrence.—On the same sandy beach at Departure Bay, 
which I have described in my account of MJesochetopterus, the 
tubes of a second smaller Cheetopterid were discovered. They 
are composed of a translucent horny material and are annulated, 
the joints occurring at short intervals. In length they some- 
times exceed a foot and a half, running vertically down through 
the sand and ending in a neatly rounded apex. In diameter the 
tube is less than 2 millimetres, the worm fitting fairly tightly 
within its habitation. A single individual occurs in each tube, 
with its long peristomial tentacles often projecting from the 
aperture. 

The distribution of Zelepsavus has been found to be a wide 
one. Generally it may be said to occur wherever Mesochetopterus 
exists. I have collected both together in Departure Bay, at Olga 
in the San Juan Archipelago, on Ballard Beach, Seattle, U.S.A., 
and by dredging in two or three fathoms of water at Nanoose 
Bay, Vancouver Island. : 

At the end of August 1911, too, I found Zelepsavus at Skide- 
gate in the Queen Charlotte Islands, 500 miles to the north, 
living in muddy gravel. Here and at Departure Bay at the 


970 MR, F, A. POTS ON. 
beginning of the month the female worms had well-developed 
orange gonads. 

Size.—The almost complete individual measured was about 
5 em. long and nearly 2 mm. broad (i. e. about the same length 
as and rather broader than the two species hitherto described). 

T cannot, unfortunately, say anything about the structure of 
the head. The anterior region consists of 9 segments. In my 
specimen the 7th, 8th, and 9th segments, but particularly the 
two latter, are much longer than the others. In this particular 
the Canadian form agrees with the description of 7. bonhowuret, 


Text-figure 6. 


Ms 
| 


B (ae 


Telepsavus sp. 
A. Enlarged seta from 4th segment. X 70. 


B, C Notopodial setie from 5th segment. A lanceolate type occurring in 
H a dorsal position. X 325. 


while the figure of 7’. costarwm shows little of such a differ- 
entiation. I should like, however, to assure myself of the 
importance of this point (which is strongly emphasised by Gravier) 
on more and better material and by a comparison with specimens 
from Naples. 

In the 4th segment there is a single greatly enlarged seta 
(text-fig. 6 A), The point of this is an irregular triangle. The 
base is slightly curved and quite entire (in 7. bonhourei it is 
furnished with a fringe of projecting points). The longer of the 
outer sides is furnished with very unequal serrations. There is 
also an auxiliary bundle consisting of a few fine sete, such as 
is figured for 7. costarum, while it is expressly stated that it 
does not exist in 7’. bonhowrei. A series of types of notopodial 
setxe 1s Shown in text-fig. 7. 


971 


POLYCH ZETA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 


Text-figure iG 


\ 


Telepsavus sp. 


Other types of notopodial sete from anterior region. X 820. 


Text-figure 8. 


mot, acc. 


“pap. 


Telepsavus sp. 
Lateral view of posterior region. 
obe of this; pap., papilla of unknown 
nature; new7., neuropodiun. 


not., notopodium ; aec.l., accessory ] 


Behind the anterior region there are between 30 and 40 seg- 
ments, all of the same type with a pifid notopodium (text-fig. 8). 
The first three segments are distinctly longer than the rest, and 


972 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


there is no such development of glandular papille on their dorsal 
surface as is figured in the Neapolitan species (but absent in 
1’. bonhouwrei). ‘he parapodia throughout consist, as is usual, of 
a bifid notopodium with capillary sete, a lateral accessory lobe 
such as occurs in Phyllochetopterus, and a double neuropodium 
consisting of two adjacent uncinigerous ridges. There is, more- 
over, in all the segments a very distinct, occasionally double, 
papilla just anterior to the notopodium. ‘This may be the 
nephridial papilla, but, if so, its position is more dorsal than 
usual. 

The ventral surface of the anterior region is deeply tinged 
with a brown to purple pigment. In thisit apparently resembles 
T. costarum, while in 7’. bonhowrei the 7th segment alone is 
markedly pigmented. 

From the points which have been stated here it will be seen 
that the form certainly differs specifically from 7’. bonhowrei and 
probably also from 7’. costarwne. 


PHYLLOCH EroPrEeRUS Grube. 


PHYLLOCHATOPTERUS PROLIFICA, Sp. n. (Plates 1V., V.; Text- 
fig. 11.) 

Phyllochetopterus of small size (1-3 em. in length), with eye- 
spots. Anterior region usually with 12 setigerous seyments; a single 
enlarged seta in each parapodium of the 4th segment. Median 
region with a very variable number of segments. In segments of 
posterior region each notopodium contains a single seta. Tubes 
creeping, usually containing several individuals and possessing 
several short branches opening to the exterior. 

This species of Phyllochetopterus was first collected outside 
the harbour of Nanaimo. Here, as was proved by frequent 
dredgings between the Five Finger Rocks on the north and the 
island of Gabriola to the south, the muddy bottom is covered 
with a thick growth of hexactinellid sponges (Bathydorus dawsoni, 
Aphrocallistes whiteavesii), and associated with these are the thin 
and delicate tubes which prove to contain Phyllochetopterus, 
sometimes sparsely scattered, sometimes in such thick and 
tangled masses that the dredge contained little else. Later in 
the year, a visit to the Marine Biological Station of the Uni- 
versity of Washington at Friday Harbour showed that this 
annelid oceurs abundantly in various localities in Puget Sound. 
It was dredged at many points in the San Juan Archipelago 
and found associated with very different companions. In the 
dredgings from deeper water (down to 60 fathoms) masses of 
large barnacles (Balanus aquila) and the tubes of the Polychet 
Sabellaria also occurred; in shallower waters (up to 5 fathoms) 
the Phyllochetopterus tubes were entwined with red seaweeds. 
But though the vertical range as seen above is fairly notable, it 
never occurs above low-tide mark, where it is succeeded by the 
other members of the family, MJesochetopterus and Telepsavus. 


POLYCHETA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 973 
The fact that though so abundant this Phyllochetopterid has 
remained up to the present undescribed is due to the slender 
nature of the tubes, which easily escape identification as the 
habitation of an annelid, and to the difficulty of preservation. 

In its wide distribution and its habit of forming intertwined ~ 
masses of tubes, P. prolifica resembles P. socialis of the Mediter- 
ranean, of which Claparede wrote in 1866: “Cette annélide est 
probablement l’espece la plus abondante dans le golfe de Naples*, 
ou ses tubes juxtaposés, grisatres, papyracés et enchevétrés les 
uns dans les autres par leur extrémité postérieure, paraissent 
former d’immenses prairies. Du moins les pécheurs apportent- 
ils & premicre requisition, sous la nom de ceppa grande, des piéces 
quon prendrait pour de grands quartiers de gazon, et qui sont 
formées presque exclusivement par les tubes de ce Phyllo- 
chétoptere.” In P. pictus, too, described by Cyril Crossland (2) 
from Zanzibar in 1903, a similar habit was observed. On the 
occasion of its discovery the tubes ‘‘ were found clustered together 
in considerable numbers on the underside of a large stone at 
low-water level.” But in the remaining species of the genus 
hitherto described the worms inhabit straight solitary tubes. 

As will be seen later, examination of the individuals of 
P. prolifica shows that the size and external characteristics of the 
species tally fairly well with the description of P. socialis. But 
that there is a deeper physiological connection is indicated by the 
occurrence in both species of more than one individual in a single 
tube. The phenomenon of asexual reproduction, which Claparéde 
suggested as the cause of the colonial habit in P. socialis, 1 wish 
to record here as the outstanding feature of P. prolijfica. 

I will first give Claparéde’s statement on this point which 
follows immediately after the passage quoted above :—‘* L’étude 
de cette annélide a fait surgi quelques curieux problémes physio- 
logiques. Les ceppe grandi qu'apportent les pecheurs sont formées 
exclusivement par des individus d’un méme sexe, généralement 
des males, les femelles étant a ce qu’il semble beaucoup plus rares 
que les males. Hn outire, chaque tube est réguliérement habiteé 
par deux ou trois individus, tous adultes et mtrs. Le tube est 
cependant si étroit que seul lindividu antérieur peut fait sortir 
ses tentacules par l’ouverture, tandis que les suivants sont empri- 
sonnés derriére lui. Dans de paveilles conditions, on doit sup- 
poser tout naturellement que ces derniers ont été engendrés par 
bourgeonnement postérieur a lextrémité du premier, et que peut- 
étre méme tous les individus d’une méme ceppa sont nés par 
gemmation. ‘Toute-fois je n'ai pas réussi a vérifier l’exactitude 
de cette hypothése. Je ne suis pas méme trés-certain des rapports 
des tubes entre eux. Ces petites habitations cylindriques larges 
A peine d’un millimetre et longues parfois de 8 a 10 centimetres, 
sont irréguliérement contournées dans leur partie postérieure, 
sondées les unes aux autres, et ne peuvent se séparer sans 


* T understand that P. socialis is now considered something of a rarity at 
Naples. 


974 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


déchirures. I] m’a semblé quelles s’anastomosaient parfois, ce- 
pendant j’éprouve quelque hésitation & affiumer ce point. Ilya 
done, on le voit, encore bien des questions 4 vider au sujet de ces 
vers.” 

The incompleteness of Claparéde’s observations leaves us in 
some uncertainty with regard to P. socialis. As I understand 
the foregoing passage, he was unable to assure himself as to which 
.of the following alternatives was correct. Either ; 

(1) There are a number of unbranched tubes packed close 
together, but without connection, each tube containing two or 
three individuals, but having only a single opening ; 

Or else (2) these adjacent tubes are in reality connected with 
one another, and the whole bundle of tuhes (ceppa) is a single 
colony, all the worms contained in which have probably been 
budded off from a single original individual. This is supported 
by the fact that sne worms in a bundle are all of the same sex. 

In P. prolifica, on the other hand, the relations of the tubes 
are perfectly clear. Where they come into contact they do not 
adhere in the complex manner described by Claparéde. In the 
following paragraph I state shortly the conditions which are 
found in the colonies. 

The tubes are comparatively long and sometimes divide into 
two or more branches of approximately equal length. Most 
contain more than one worm and some as many as six. The 
main tube is provided with several short branches which open to 
the exterior, but the number of openings does not correspond to 
the number of worms in the tube. The worms can change their 
position in the tube fairly rapidly and can turn round and pass 
each other. Those individuals which occupy a favourable position 
protrude their long tentacles from one of the openings to assist 
in the collection of food. 

It occurred to me on first observing the above facts, while I 
was still unaware of Claparéde’s observations on L. socialis, that 
an explanation was probably to be found by supposing some sort 
of asexual reproduction to occur in the species. The nature of 
this reproduction was indicated by a discovery made during an 
early examination of the living material at Departure Bay. 
T was surprised to find emerging from freshly dredged tubes 
very short individuals which differed considerably from the 
normal forms in the constitution of their bodies. One of these 
only measured 6 mm., which is +—7 of the normal length. The 


3 = 
segments of which it was composed were arranged as follows :— 


Anterior region ...... 8 segments. 
Median LS Vy Fa Bk 2 es 
Posterior 2 hee 20-30 ,, 


Not only did the anterior region consist of less than the 
normal number of segments (12), but also there was no segment 
with a modified seta such as occurs in all adults of the species, 
and the peristomial tentacles were represented by minute stumps. 
The number of segments in the median region was exceedingly 


POLYCH STA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 975 


small, but the segments themselves both here and in the posterior 
region were normally developed, while there could not be the 
slightest doubt but that the anterior region was in process of 
regeneration. 

A second individual found at the same time gave another stage 
in the phenomenon. It was more nearly the normal size. The 
regions contained the following numbers of segments :— 


Anterior region...... 11 segments. 
Micdiangy sy) sack : 5 P 
Rosteniony sone... 20-30 __,, 


The anterior region thus contained nearly the normal number 
of segments, but it was shorter than usual and the peristomial 
tentacles were less than half the usual length. ‘This seemed a 
second case in which the anterior region was repeneratine. 

On returning to Cambridge, a detailed examination of a large 
amount of material preserved in formalin was made. Tube by 
tube was taken and slit up, and the length and constitution of 
the three regions noted in all the individuals contained therein. 
Jt was quite clearly shown that living constantly though the 
animals do within the shelter of a tube, regenerating specimens 
are frequently found. From an examination of these it seems 
certain that a fragment of Phyllochetopterus containing only 
segments of the median and posterior regions easily regenerates 
an entire anterior region. The number of cases in which this 
phenomenon has apparently occurred, and the fact that in their 
protected situation regeneration after external injury is an 
unlikely event, leads me to suppose that these animals have the 
power of autotomy and that it is exercised for the distinct 
purpose of reproduction. 

The tables which follow present the results of the detailed 
examination of several tubes, each represented by a separate 


TABLE L. 


Constitution of the three body regions. 


A. B. C. | Total length 
Anterior. | Median. Posterior. | of worm. 
| | 
Nas ie 2a 12 | 6 5 | 13mm. 
Piece LS ak be No ee a es 
INO; Brae cor 12 a none | 18mm, 


a | | 


(| Small regenerating stump | ?) | 
' 1 mm. long; segments | 5 39 | 
va e og | 

| 

| 


No. 3 a || not sufficiently differ- \ 


entiated to count. 


976 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


table. The figures in the columns A, B, and C indicate through- 
out the numbers of segments in the regions referred to. 

In this tube (Table I.) from Departure Bay Nos. 2 and 3 appear 
to be complementary, and represent an individual broken in two 
in the median region. While, however, the median segments of 
No. 3 have already regenerated a short and undifferentiated 
region, those of No. 2 have not yet attempted to form a posterior 
region. The regenerating end of No. 3 is figured in Pl. V. 
fig. 12, and it will be seen that a number of segments have 
been marked off by furrows, but that parapodia and sete have 
not yet developed. The peristomium is indicated by the rudi- 
mentary tentacles. It will be noticed that almost the full number 
of segments is established at once, and apparently development 
proceeds simultaneously in each of them. 


TABLE II. 


| 
A. Length of A*. Bb. C. Total length. 


| 

| 

| 

| —— 

| | 

LeNow ics: 11 5°5 mm. (4) 10 12 | 20mm. 

pate a ee) ees 

| No. 2)... 9 4. nm. (+) 8 22 | 15mm. 
INOHoIEE: 12 2mm. (3) 8 40 175 mm. 

| 28 

| No. 4...| 12 | 4mm. (4) 4 (+number of very 19mm. | 

| small segments) | 

| sos ake 
| No. 5 ...| 12 | 65 mm. (3) 14 | 20 21mm. | 
Non Ghee: 12 we 3 20 16 mm. 


| t 


Another tube from Friday Harbour (Table II.) contained six 
individuals, all of which with one exception were well-developed 
and complete specimens. It will be seen that while the number 
of segments is more constant in the anterior region than in the 
other two, its length varies very considerably and bears no 
definite relation to the total length of the body, In No. 3 
(Plate V. fig. 13) it is extremely short, although it possesses the 
usual number of segments, which are of normal width and have 
the full development of setze. There is, however, no strengthened 
seta in the fourth segment, and the peristomial tentacles are 
about half-grown. 

In the other individuals the length of this region varies from 
4-6°5 mm. 

* 


he fraction in this column represents the proportion borne by the length 
of A to the total length. 


fo) 
a | 
=~] 


POLYCH-ETA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 


Tasie [I1. 


A. Length of A. B. | C. Total length. 


ieNiosnlacee 12 6 mm. (+) 8 | 26 , 30mm. 

| | 

| { i Peas 

)No. 2...) 0s as | “6 13 6 mm. 
fi ea | veer) oo) pri go thee 
a very small regenerating | 

+ | 5 99, | 9 
| No.3...) stump. | 2 | 12mm. 
if 

= | —— Seen ae 

| | | 

| No. 4...| 12 | 55 mm. (4) | 10 | 10 | 24 mm. 

| } | 

| aca arose oa ee a) ey 

\ | | 22 

INos See 12 | 6mm. (3) a \+15 very small 27 mm. 
segments. 


In this colony (also from Friday Harbour) there are three 
worms complete anteriorly and two fragments, one of which 1s 
commencing regeneration, Of the first-mentioned, however, 
No. 4 has probably lately suffered the loss of posterior segments, 
as shown by the small number of those remaining and the 
moderate total length. No. 5 is interesting from the possession 
of a tail of very small posterior segments following others of 
normal size, and these must represent regeneration after 
autotomy. 

From the comparative rarity of regenerated tails in autotomised 
worms, it is evident that the anterior region is re-formed much 
more quickly than the posterior. With regard to the median 
region, there are two facts which seem to show that regeneration 
of new segments of this type takes place but rarely. These are: 

(1) the great variation in the number of segments (from 
4 to 14), even in individuals with well-developed anterior and 
posterior regions, and 

(2) the absence of segments of two different sizes in the 
region, | have, however, examined one animal alive in its tube 
in which the normal segments of the median region were 
preceded by a single newly formed segment of similar type, but 
only about half the size of the others, I cannot say whether the 
anterior region was fully formed or not, Cases of regeneration 
of median segments then do exist, if but rarely. 

The facts incline me to suggest that asexual generation only 
occurs successfully when fragmentation takes place in the median 
region, that regeneration proceeds both on the anterior and 
posterior surfaces of the plane of rupture, however small a 
number of segments are left on one side, but that these median 
segments usually regenerate anterior or posterior segments, and 


Proc. Zoot. Soc.— 1914, No. LX VI. 66 


978 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


only segments like themselves when the other two regions have 
been completed. 

Fragments consisting of segments of the posterior region 
alone are, however, occasionally met with, and in one case 
(Table Tl. No. 3) a minute regenerating stump was found. At 
the same time there is no evidence that complete regeneration 
occurs from abdominal segments alone. 

Another case may be mentioned in which autotomy had 
occurred in the middle of the anterior region and a number of 
segments of smaller size were superimposed on the older 
segments. 

Plate V. illustrates two well-marked regeneration stages of the 
anterior region from individuals mentioned above, and they 
should be compared with the individual of normal development 
shown on the same plate (fig. 14). 


REGENERATION IN Cheetopterus. 


Since the above was written, | have read the observations of 
Gravier on autotomy and regeneration in Chetopterus variopedatus. 
When an individual is seized by the anterior part of the body, or 
when it is strongly irritated, rupture takes place between the 
first and second segments of the median region—this being the 
place of least resistance. The anterior fragment can reproduce 
all the rest: the posterior has not always been regarded a 
capable of regeneration. But Gravier (6) describes and | figures a 
posterior fragment, collected at Saint Vaast-la-Hogue, which 
Carries a regenerated anterior region ay differentiated but quite 
minute. Gravier’s drawi ing (l.c. fig. 2, p. 147) resembles almost 
exactly those I have given for P. prolifica. The whole anterior 
region hardly equals in length a single original segment, but it 
possesses a buccal funnel and per istomial tentacles, and the lateral 
border is marked out into segments, 12 conical seta-bearing 
notopodia being present on each side. Only in the 4th segment 
the special sete are not indicated, and the peristomial tentacles 
are unequally developed. There are some irregularities, also, in 
the notopodia, but, generally speaking, they are of nearly equal 
development. Only the last segment is markedly smaller than 
the rest, which thus appear to be marked off nearly simultaneously. 
The total number of segments is 12, while the normal number is 
only 9. Individuals with 12 segments are very exceptional, and 
it is curious to find that in regeneration the maximum number 
of segments should be formed. 

The first segment of the median region is present, but in a 
very rudimentary condition. Noto- and neuropodia are visible, 
but it has obviously been formed after the segments of the 
anterior region. 

If we summarise the phenomenon so far as it is known in 
Chetopterus, it may be said (1) that autotomy occurs sometimes 


POLYCHEHTA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 979 


as the result of an unexpected stimulus*; (2) that, following 
autotomy, regeneration will take place from the posterior fragment, 
the median region thus giving rise to the whole of the anterior 
region, and after that replacing the missing median segment. 

There is thus a clear resemblance to the manner of regeneration 
in Phyllochetopterus and also a clear minor distinction, the 
presence of a definite breaking-point in Chetopterus and its 
absence in Phyllochetopterus. Autotomy and a complete type of 
regeneration are thus to some extent characteristic of the family 
Cheetopteride. In Phyllochetopterus prolifica, however, the occa- 
sions on which autotomy takes place are so frequent and regular as 
to subserve a definite method of asexual reproduction. But the 
nature of the stimuli which cause autotomy, and the question 
whether the phenomenon is in any sense under the control of the 
animal itself, can hardly be approached as yet. 

Some advantage may, I think, be gained by comparing the 
cases of regeneration studied in other Polycheta with a differentia- 
tion of regions. Ivanow (8) and other authors have made a very 
thorough examination of these phenomena in the case of the 
Sabellid Spirographis spallanzani. Here there are three regions : 
the anterior thoracic with the prostomium, bearing the enormously 
developed tentacles, and the first three setigerous segments; the 
posterior thoracic, consisting of eight or nine following segments ; 
and the abdominal, with an indefinite number of segments. Only 
such fragments regenerate as consist of abdominal segments or of 
abdominal and thoracic segments. ‘Those containing thoracic 
segments only always disintegrate. In regenerating fragments, 
the hinder end always produces abdominal segments, and the 
anterior end regenerates the prostomium and the three anterior 
thoracic segments. The posterior thorax develops later by the 
metamorphosis of the most anterior abdominal segments, a 
striking change taking place in the characters of the parapodia. 
The dorsal uncini are replaced by capillary sete, while in the 
neuropodium the capillary setz are replaced by uncini. 

A similar phenomenon has been described by Watson (12) in 
Potamilla reniformis, another Sabellid. Here, in the regeneration 
of the anterior region from abdominal fragments, the prostomium 
and one new setigerous thoracic segment only are formed as a new 
growth: all the rest of the thoracic segments are formed from 
abdominal segments in which a modification of the parapodia 
like that described above occurs. It is curious that two regions, 
differing from each other so little in morphological characters as 
do the anterior and posterior thoracic regions of Spirographis, 
should have such a dissimilar method of re-formation. 

Though my observations on regeneration in Phyllochetopterus 


* In 1913, at Plymouth, I noticed that of a tubful of Chetopterus which had 
been brought i in, after being kept on board a trawler for 20 hours or so, nearly all had 
autotomised, as a result of “the unhealthy conditions, rupture taking’ place between 
the first and second segments of the median region. 

66% 


980 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


are incomplete, it seems probable that the phenomenon here runs 
a very different course. The three regions of the Chetopterid 
have no probable connection with those of the Sabellid, nor is 
there any reason that they should behave in a physiologically 
similar manner. In Phyllochetopterus it seems fairly certain, as 
I have pointed out above, that regeneration takes place most 
often from fragments containing median as well as posterior 
(abdominal) segments, and in all cases the full number of 
segments in the anterior region is budded off. But, while in 
both Cheetopterids and Sabellids the anterior region is restored 
by regeneration, in the former family the median region is not 
completely re-formed as is the case in the latter. The number of 
segments in the median region is so variable in number that for 
this and other reasons I am inclined to suppose that regeneration 
does not take place here, or only very slowly. ‘There is certamly 
not the slightest evidence, in any regenerating individuals which 
I have examined, of a transformation of the posterior (abdominal) 
segments into median segments, such as characterises the 
Sabellids. 


Tuer Possrpitiry oF ASEXUAL GENERATION IN P. pictus. 


The case of Phyllochetopterus pictus described by Crossland has 
already been mentioned. It will be interesting here to quote 
some figures which Crossland gives to show the variability in the 
numbers of segments in the anterior (A) and median (B) regions. 
Hight individuals were examined. They are indicated by the 
Roman numerals running across the page :— 


I. II, ite Nye Vie Vie VU) Sve 
AP gia 16 as 13 15 12 15 13 
Bee’ 9 D 7 5 o 8 


Here, too, it will be seen that the median region is much more 
variable than the anterior, the numbers ranging from 3—9 for a 
very small sample of individuals. In view of this and the fact 
that the annelid inhabits clusters of tubes, the relations of which 


are difficult to make out, I think it is possible that asexual 
generation occurs here too. 


MISCELLANEOUS OBSERVATIONS ON THE Habits oF 
Phyllocheiopterus prolifica. 


Owing to the transparency of the tube, in the younger colonies 
at least, it is possible to see something of the movements of the 
worm within. It shifts its position in the tube by the alternate 
relaxation and contraction of the body; when contraction occurs, 
the sete of that part of the body affected are braced against the 
sides of the tube. The sete of the abdomen can be definitely 


POLYCH.ETA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC, 981 


used as organs of progression, pushing the animal along. The 
worms can thus move with some rapidity, and they can also turn 
within the tube and even pass each other. When at rest they 
generally lie with the long tentacles projecting from an aperture 
evidently questing for food. All the inhabitants of the tube may 
not be able to obtain such advantageous situations, but from 
their activity within the tube it is evident that a fr equent inter- 
change of position does take place. The worms do not all lie the 
same way, so it is difficult to see how a constant and sufficient 
circulation of water can be maintained through the whole tube. 
Probably at times the animal is entirely quiescent and the 
respiratory current interrupted. In all the animals I observed, 
the action of the cilia in the dorsal groove and of the notopodia 
of the median region is responsible for a current running poste- 
riorly, which supplies not only oxygen but also food, as in the 
other Chetopterids. This action is sometimes vigorously supple- 
mented by the undulatory movements of the abdomen. This 
energetic action—a phenomenon often observed, too, in Cheto- 
pterus—is possibly necessary for removing objectionable particles 
from the neighbourhood of the body. hn P. anglica and to a 
less degree in P. prolifica, 1t may be seen, however, that the 
circulation of water is not always thorough, for large sections of 
the tube behind worms are blocked by fecal masses, and this 
may eventually necessitate the abandonment of the old parts and 
extension of the colony. 

I have not observed any individuals bearing genital products, 
but this is probably due to insufficient examinations and I should 
not like to suggest that asexual generation has supplanted the 
sexual method. Isolated individuals (like those of Chetopterus) 
are not able to manufacture fresh tubes in spite of copious secretion 
of mucus, and new colonies must be formed in the first place by 
a single individual developed from a fertilised egg, though this, 
by fragmentation, gives rise to all the inhabitants of the Rcolony 
Claparéde made the interesting observation that, in P. socialis, all 
the worms in a bundle of tubes developed genital products of the 
same sex, indicating that they were all derived from a single 
sexually produced embryo. 


Some Ports IN THE MoRPHOLOGY OF THE CH&TOPTERIDE. 


Variation in Form of the Notopodia.— Behind the anterior 
region of the body both notopodium and neuropodium are 
present in the parapodium. In nearly all cases the neuropodium 
is stable and retains its character as a double uncinigerous ridge. 
In Mesochetopterus, where the first neuropodium of the median 
region is single, there is a slight modification, and in Cheetopterus 
the neuropodia of opposite sides in the median region are fused 
to form a sucker. 

The notopodium, on the other hand, is very variable, and it 


982 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


may be of some service to arrange the different types in a 
tabular form :— 


A single lobe without sete ....,.......---..-.-- +22. Ranzania, 16th and all succeeding 
segments. 
(A single seta ........... Most species of Phyllochetopterus 


A single conical lobe } in the posterior region. 
with setz. 
ie sete ............. Chetopterus and Phyllocheto- 
pterus aciculigerus, claparedet 

in the posterior region. 
Ranzania, 13th and 14th segments. 


; (Phyllochetopterus, (A conical or aliform erooved struc: 
A bilobed foliaceous | in the median region. | ture (with several capillary 
structure with seve-~ Telepsavus, 4 Prete ie bt 
ral capillary sete. | all segments behind | C’@topterus, Ist segment 0 
median region. 
| Mesochetopterus, median region. 
The two notopodia of the seg- 
ment fused toe form a fan-like 
structure. 
Chetopterus, segments 3-5 of me- 
dian region. 


(the anterior region. 


The structural types can thus be arranged in a neat series, and 
there is some evidence to show the direction in which evolution 
has taken place. Both the conical and the foliaceous types are 
adapted, the one for progression in the tube, the other for the 
respiratory function. But since the median region has been 
clearly developed from the posterior, and the conical type of 
posterior notopodium is far more widespread than the foliaceous 
type (Telepsavus alone), it seems reasonable to regard the conical 
notopodium as the move primitive. In this case, Telepsavus is x 
specialised form, in which all the posterior segments have de- 
veloped foliaceous notopodia and the original type has been lost. 
But Ranzania, though the parapodia are unilobed throughout the 
body, is not to be regarded as the primitive form from which 
the Cheetopterids diverged. The absence of sete from most of the 
posterior notopodia and of long tentacles may surely be regarded 
as secondary. The 13th and 14th segments are so distinct 
from the rest as to almost merit inclusion in a separate median 
region. 


The Head in the Chetopteride. 


In the structure of the head there is also a certain amount of 
variation in the family. The prostominm is in most cases provided 
with eyes, but it is small in all forms and almost surrounded 
by the peristomiwm, which forms a collar. In Chetopterus and 
Mesocheetopterus this collar is so complete as almost to hide the 
prostomium, while in Phyllochetopterus it is incomplete dorsally 
and shallow, allowing the prostomium to be seen easily. The 
peristomium gives rise to a pair of tentacles which vary greatly | 
in length, and in Phyllochetopterus there is also a second pair of 


POLYCH-ETA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 983 


structures which are generally stated to be tentacles. They are 
very small flat organs, lying on each side of the prostomium, and 
generally covering the eyes. Claparéde showed, in the case of 
P. socialis, that they contained two or three thin capillary sete. 
This circumstance is easily verified in such species as I have 
examined, and it leads me to suggest that we are in error 1n 
regarding these structures as tentacles. They are much more 
probably the reduced and modified notopodia of the peristomial 
segment itself, 

It may be of some advantage to dwell on this point at greater 
length. In Annelids the peristomium 1s the segment behind the 
prostomium, and it can be generally recognised and homologised 
throughout the group. This fact is, however, due more to its 
position than to any morphological characters which distinguish 
it from those sueceeding, and it is generally recognised as the 
most anterior of the trunk-segments, which has been considerably 
modified in connection with the mouth. With regard to its 
identity with the other segments of the trunk, Goodrich says :-— 
“‘ Gareful modern researches (Vejdovsky, Wilson, etc.) have shown 
that in Oligochetes the peristomium exhibits the essential charac- 
ters of a true segment. It develops as a region surroun ding the 
mouth, in which are formed a pair of mesoblastic somites which 
become hollowed out to form the ccelom; a ganglionic thickening 
is produced ventrally, which soon fuses with that of the succeeding 
segment; a nephridium (head kidney) is developed. In the 
Polychetes—in some cases, at all events,—it has been shown that 
a pair of somites are formed in the peristomium, become hollowed 
ont, and even give rise to peritoneal funnels. Nephridia are 
almost invariably developed in this segment. In Polychetes, 
moreover, a pair of lateral appendages are often developed, though 
they generally become highly modified. In fact, it becomes 
evident, when we examine the development and the adult structure 
of the peristomium in the various groups of the Annelids, that it 
is really a metamere strictly comparable to the posterior segments, 
even when much modified owing to its position at the anterior 
end of the animal.” 

In the Syllids, the Polynoids, and other groups, the peristomium 
consists of a segment which bears on each side a dorsal and 
a ventral cirrus. That these are the remains of a typical para- 
podium, in which the notopodium and neuropodium with their 
setee have disappeared, is shown by a number of cases amongst 
the Polynoids, which could probably be duplicated in other 
families, where the first segment carries not only cirri but also 
sete. In Polynoé extenuata, described by Claparéde, the peri- 
stomium shows an aciculum and a couple of setae. In Pontogenia, 
Sthenelais, Sigalion, and in Palmyra amongst the Palmyride, the 
peristomium possesses a notopodium with several sete, and only 
differs from the succeeding segments in the absence of neuropodial 
sete. 

These cases show that the peristomium may be an almost 


984 . MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


unmodified trunk-segment. On the other hand, it often occurs 
that trunk-segments fuse with the peristomium and then lose 
their parapodia, with the exception of the dorsal and ventral cirri. 
So that the same process which has affected the peristomium may 
modify the succeeding segments in a similar way. 

The object of this digression is to show that the retention of a 
parapodium in the peristomium of Phyllochetopterus is by no 
means without parallel in other families of Polychets. The 
constancy of the phenomenon makes it of generic value, and 
suggests that possibly the rudimentary notopodium has under- 
gone a change of function which we cannot yet appreciate. 


DESCRIPTION OF A NEW Species, 7. anglica, From Brirish WATERS, 
AND A CoMPARISON OF THOSE SPECIES OF THE GENUS WHICH 
FORM ‘TRUE CoLONIEs. 

PHYLLOCHEZTOPTERUS ANGLICA. (Pl. VI.; Text-figs. 9, 10, 12.) 

Phyllochxtopterus of moderate size (2-12 em. in length), with 
eye-spots. Anterior region with a variable number of segments 
(13-16); @ single enlarged seta in each parapodium of the 4th 
segment. Median region also with a variable number of segments 
(11-25). Tubes creeping; often several run parallel to each 
other, with short lateral connections. More than one individual in 
the same system of tubes. 

Locality. English Channel. 

I obtained this species in March of the present year (1913), 
while working at the laboratory of the Marine Biological Associa- 
tion at Plymouth. Tubs of Chetopterus-tubes were brought in 
from trawlers, apparently obtained from an area a little south of 
the Eddystone. Attached to the Chetopterus-tubes were numbers 
of other very slender tubes, often arranged in parallel bundles. 
Sometimes they were embedded in the substance of the larger 
tube, at other times they were entirely surrounded by large 
colonies of Aleyoniwm, so that it seems that the communities of 
Phyllochetopterus anglica are of comparatively long standing. 

In the character of its colonies this species seems to be inter- 
mediate between P. socialis and P. prolifica, and it will be 
profitable to make a definite comparison :— 

(1) In P. prolifica (Pl. IV.) the colony is usually contained in 
a single, long, stolon-like tube (sometimes bifurcating) with a 
number of very short branches communicating with the exterior, 
and consists of a comparatively large number of smal] individuals 
which reproduce asexually with rapidity (at least in the summer). 

(2) In P. socialis the colony seems to occupy a large number 
of parallel and adherent tubes, the communication between which 
can only be made out with great difficulty. In each mass of © 
tubes the individuals are, however, of the same sex. A single 
tube contains two or three individuals, 

(3) In P. anglica (Pl. VI. figs. 15, 16) the colony is likewise 
contained in a number of tubes, which tend to run parallel, but 
are not,asarule,adherent. The open nature of the colony leaves 


POLYCH.ETA FROM THE N.E, PACIFIC. 985 


no but doubt that the tubes are connected. Usually each con- 
stituent tube contains a single individual longer than those of 
P. proiifica, Small subsidiary apertures may be placed at the end 
of branchlets of the main tube, as in P. prolifica. 

These distinctions which I have attempted to draw may, on 
further examination of the genus, prove to be insufficiently 
grounded. I feel quite certain, however, that P. prolifica in the 
N.E. Pacific does not usually form the dense colonies charac- 
teristic of P. socialis, nor do connected tubes run parallel as in 
P. anglica. 

It is possible, too, that these three species differ in the extent 
to which asexual reproduction is developed in each. In particular, 
it may be mentioned that P. prolifica is the only species in which 
asexual reproduction was found to be proceeding at the moment 
of discovery.* In P. anglica I was not successful in finding any 
example which showed signs of recent regeneration. It is 
probable that this phenomen takes place later in the year than 
the time when my specimens were collected, but I incline te 
beheve that autotomy and regeneration are never so frequent as 
in P. prolifica, a cvcumstance which accounts for the smallei 
number of individuals contained in much longer tubes. 

In the morphological characters of the animals themselves, I 
must confess to a considerable difficulty in distinguishing between 
these three species. Myr. Crossland has pointed out that some 
species of Phyllochcetopterus are easily recognised by definite 
characters, like the number of inodified sete in the notopodium of 
the fourth setigerous segment, the presence or absence of eye- 
spots, and the number of sete in the notopodium of the 
posterior region (C), as well as the character of the tubes. In all 
four species, which have developed asexual reproduction, eye-spots 
are present, a single strengthened seta is usually found in the 
notopodium of the fourth segment and a single seta in each 
notopodium of region C, while the tubes they inhabit are 
creeping and branched. It seems to me that there is sufficient 
difference between the forms here described to preserve them as 
distinct species, though they must, from their morphological 
character's, as well as from their manner of life and reproduction, 
be classed as very nearly related. There are, moreover, differences 
in the size, the number of segments in the several regions of the 
body, and in the shape of the prostomium and peristomium 
which help to supplement the biological peculiarities which I 
have indicated above. 


Comparison of the external Morphology of those Species of 
Phyllochetopterus which form True Colonies. 


(1) The Prostomium and Peristomium.—In P. anglica, the 
prostomium (text-fig. 9) is rather broad, though small, and its 
borders are marked by a line of dark pigment. The eyes ave 
placed on the extreme side of the head, and are overlapped and 


* This was in the summer (May-July). 


986 MR. F. A. POLTS ON 


hidden by the peristomial appendages, which are here small 
and slender objects. The peristomium forms a well-developed 
funnel. In P. prolifica, on, the other hand, though I have 
examined a large number of individuals, I have experienced 
considerable difficulty in making out the relations of the pro- 
and peristomium. J think it is possible to say that the pro- 
stomium is smaller, and less definite than in P. anglica, and that 
the peristomial appendages are quite minute, and do not cover 
the eyes. The peristomial funnel is complete. 

I have been able to examine two of the species described by 
Mr. Crossland, and preserved in the Museum of Zoology at 
Cambridge, to test the variation which occurs in the different 
species of Phyllochcetopterus. In P. elioti from Zanzibar the 
pevistomial appendages are compa atively large and definite 
structures, though they do not cover the eyes, the prostomium 
is much better developed than in P. anglica aud P prolifica, 
but the peristomial funnel completes little more than a semicircle 


(Crossland, 2, pl. xiv. fig. 1). 


Text-figure 9. 


Phyllochetopterus anglica. 
Dorsal view of head and anterior segments. 


In P. pictus, also from the neighbourhood of Zanzibar, the 
prostomium is rather large and fleshy, and the peristomium does 
not form a funnel but a conical elevation, divided behind by a 
median groove; the mouth is a small slit-like aperture. In 
another species P. aciculigerus described by Crossland, the 
peristomium is very much reduced, forming a cone with a rounded 
mouth. The prostomium is small, but definite. 

From the small series of species here examined, I have 
ventured to draw some conclusions. The prostomium is always 
a very definite organ, except in a species like P. prolifica, where 
the peristomial collar is quite complete. The peristomium, 
however, varies a good deal. In P. pictus and aciculigerus it 1s 
small and rudimentary, while in other forms it is developed intoa 
funnel—markedly incomplete, for instance, in P. elioti, less 
so in P. anglica. With the completion of the peristomial 
funnel in Mesochetopterus taylort and Chetopterus we have the 
suppression of the prostomium and the complete disappearance 
of the peristomial appendages. I think that the conical peri- 
stomium is primitive and that the formation of the peristomial 
funnel is a direct adaptation to microphagous habits. 


POLYCHEHTA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 987 


(2) The Sete.—A good deal of time has been spent in 
endeavouring to fix the value of the notopodial sete of the 
anterior region as a basis of classification. It must, however, be 
stated that the results of this enquiry are entirely negative. The 
variation in the shape of the sete is almost endless, and seems to 
occur indiscriminately in species and individual. The dorsalmost 
sete in each parapodium are nearly always lanceolate and 
symmetrical. Individual variations occur even here in the 


Text-figure 10. 


Phyllochetopterus anglica. 
Series of notopodial sete from anterior region. 


length and thickness of the head, and substantial modification in 
the more ventral sete. The followi ing rough classification of types 
of modification may be given as indicating the range of 
variation :— 
J. Shortening of the head, which remains symmetrical (text- 
Tey Oh Age): 
IT. An increasing asymmetry of the head. 
(a) The head remains long and is drawn out into a 
long asymmetrical tip (text- fig. LOR CSD): 
(b) The head is much shortened, with a short tip and a 
broad edge (text-fig. 10, E). 


988 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


Minor variations are found, according to whether the sides of 
the head are curved or straight, to the degree of attenuation and 
curvature of the tip. 

In none of the species which have been described hitherto 
has a full examination of the notopodial sete been made. Such 
figures and notes as are given are of little value, then, in fixing 
the species; but they show, I think, that the same variations 
which oceur in P. prolifica and anglica occur in all. I have been 
able to compare these with the actual specimens of P. clapareden, 
pictus, and elioti described by Crossland, and this examination 
supports my conclusion that the notopodial sete are too variable 
to base specific characters upon. 


Text-figure 11. 


Sek 
We 


A B ce 


Phyllo chetopterus prolifica. Enlarged sete from 4th segeint. 


The specially modified sete in the fourth segment are always 
figured in descriptions of species, and their configuration is 
sometimes considered to be of diagnostic value. There is, without 
doubt, a recognisable type for each genus of the Chetopterids, 
but the modifications of this are so many, varying even in the 
same individual, that I find it impossible to regard the shape 
of the seta as in any way a specific feature. In all species of 
Phyllocheetopterus, the seta appears to end in a blunt elliptical 
crown. One or both of the sides of this are raised into a cuspate 
ridge, one ridge being generally higher than the other. The 
number of cusps is highly variable, and so is their development. 
Thus in P. prolifica (text-fig. 11, A, B) there are on the highest 
side 3, 4, or 5 cusps, and generally the cusps have a fairly equal 
development. In some cases, however, like text-fig. 11, C, one or 


POLYCH ESTA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 989 


more of the cusps are of greatly inereased size. The lower side 
of the crown is usually smooth or slightly crenulated. 

In P. anglica the set are often very similar to those of 
P. prolifica. Two sete are here figured to show the extent 
of the variation in number and size of cusps. In one of them 
(text-fig. 12, A) there are only two cusps, one of which is very 


large. In the other (text-fig. 12, B) the appearance of a cuspate 
lower border will be noticed. 


Text-figure 12. 


A B 
Phyllochetopterus anglica. 


Enlarged sete from 4th segment of two individuals, 


The figure which Crossland has given of P. pictus shows an 
enlarged seta of a type different from any which | have described 
for P. prolifica and anglica. In text-fig. 138, C, however, IT have 
drawn another seta from the 4th parapodium of a 2. pictus 
collected by Crossland, and I think, it will be seen to be easily 
derived from the seta shown in text-fig, 12, A (P. angliew). 
The cusps on the lower border are better developed in the first, 
but otherwise the two are strongly similar. ‘The bulging shaft 
of the seta mentioned by Grossland is shown also in my 
mounted specimen, but I ave observed similar phenomena in 
P. prolifiea. 

P. elioti is another species which from the published description 
appears to have a very definite type of strengthened seta. 1 
mounted two or three setz from Crossland’s specimen, and one of 
these (text-fig. 13, B) agreed fairly well with his figure. On the 
upper side the two external cusps are greatly enlarged, contrasting 
with the two small intermediate cusps (not seen at all in Cross- 
land’s figure), But another seta (text-fig. 13, A) showed an 
oblique crown with small equal cusps, like the usual type of 
P. prolifica ete. 

It is very probable that the average seta of a species is different 


990 MR. F A. POTTS ON 


from that of another species, but the point I wish to emphasise 
is that the sete of the fourth parapodium vary greatly, and a 
statement as to their character can only be made after examination 
of a large series of individuals. It has been shown in the 
preceding part of this section that the other sete of the anterior 
region are always variable, and it would have been rather 
surprising if those modified setze which are found in the fourth 
parapodium had been found to belong to types fixed for each 
species. 
Text-figure 13, 


A, B. Phyllochetopterus elioti. C. P. pictus. 


Enlarged sete from 4th segment. 


Some Remarks ON THE GENERA Spicchetopterus AND 
Phyllochetopterus. 


Until 1856 Chetopterus was the only member of the family 
known, but in that year Michael Sars (10 a) described ‘the 
genus Spiochetopterus to include a species (S. typica) from 
Norwegian waters, which differed from Chetopterus in possessing 
long peristomial tentacles. In 1863, Grube (7) instituted a third 
genus, Phyllochetopterus, for a worm from the Adriatic. But the 
two forms are undoubtedly similar, and de Quatrefages, in his 
‘Histoire des Annélés,’ goes so far as to include Grube’s polychet, 
P. gracilis, in the earlier genus Spiochetopierus. 

Spiochetopterus typica was described as living in a jointed 
transparent tube. It has long peristomial tentacles, but a pair of 


POLYCHETA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 991 


peristomial appendages was not observed. There are three well- 
differentiated regions, the median of which contains two segments 
with bifid foliaceous notopodia, exactly like those described in all 
species of Phyllochetopterus. ‘There is only one strongly modified 
seta in the 4th segment. In the posterior region there is a 
bundle of fine sete in the notopodium, but the neuropodium is 
stated to be without uncini. 

Phyllochetopterus gracilis, as originally described by Grube, 
‘possesses a pai of short peristomial tentacles. It is possible 
that in the cases examined the greater part had been broken off, 
bat Grube thinks this was unlikely. Or they may really be very 
long peristomial appendages, the tentacles being entirely lost. 
The observations are quite inadequate on this important pot. 

The 4th segment of the anterior region appears to have more 
than one strengthened seta on each side, though the number is 
not actually given. There are two segments here also in the 
median region, and they are similar in form to those of Spio- 
chetopterus. Vhe posterior region contains segments, the noto- 
podia of which each contains more than one seta; but Grube 
expresses himself as uncertain whether the neuropodium 
contains uncini or not. 

Neither of these forms has ever been rediscovered so far 
as I know, and so these descriptions remain still inadequate 
and uncorrected. But as they stand, I share the opinion of 
de Quatrefages concerning them, that no sufficient cause is shown 
for placing the Adriatic form in a separate genus. The differ- 
ences of the tentacles might be explained as errors of description, 
and the variation of number of strengthened sete in the 4th 
segment is unimportant. The presence or absence of uncini in 
the neuropodium of the posterior segments is a moot point in 
both, but it is probably their extremely small size which enabled 
them to escape detection. 

The next question which arises is whether these two forms are 
similar to those better-known species which are grouped to-day 
under the genus Phyllochetopterus. For that genus is charac- 
terised by the possession of a pair of peristomial appendages, as well 
as the long tentacles, and they may possibly have been overlooked 
by Sars and Grube in their respective discoveries. ‘The numbers 
of enlarged sete in the 4th segment and in the notopodium of 
the posterior segments and that of the segments in the median 
region are not definite generic characters. ‘The structure of the 
segments of the median region of these two forms is identical 
with the type usually associated with Phyllochetopterus. It is 
however, I think, a matter of some importance that these two 
early forms should be rediscovered and their position more 
accurately defined. For the present, the generic name Phy/lo- 
chetopterus must certainly be retained, and I trust it will not be 
necessary to go back to the older genus Spiochwtopterus. But 
in the table of the Cheetopterids which is given by Crossland he 
includes Spiochetopterus as distinct from Phyllochetopterus through 


992 MR. F. A. POTTS ON 


its single pair of tentacles. I should like to point out that both 
genera were originally described as possessing only a single pair 
of peristomial processes, and that we are not ina position to 
correct the description of the type-species. 


LITERATURE. 


(1) Chaparkpr, Epovarp.—Les Annélides Chétopodes du 
Golfe de Naples. Seconde Partie. (Pp. 76-94 for 
Cheetopterids. ) 

(2) Crosstanp, Crrit.—On the Marine Fauna of Zanzibar and 
British East Africa, from Collections made by Cyril 
Crossland in the Years 1901 and 1902.— Polycheeta. 
Part I. Proc. Zool. Soe. London, 1908, vol. i. pp. 169- 
176. 

(3) Crosstanp, Cyrin.—The Polycheta of the Maldive 
Archipelago, from the Collections made by J. Stanley 
Gardiner in 1899. Proce. Zool. Soe. London, 1904, 
vol. i. pp. 270-286, pls. xvili., xix. (For Phyllocheto- 
pterus aciculigerus and gardinert.) 

(4) Expers, Howarp.—A Study of the Life-History and Habits 
of Cheetopter us variopedatus Renier et Cl: aparede. Journ. 
Morph, Philadelphia, vol. xx. 1909, pp. 479-531, 
pls. 1.111 

(5) Gravier, C.—Annélides Polychétes de la Mer Rouge. 
Nouv. Arch. Mus. d’Hist. Nat. sér. 4, t. viii, 1906. (For 
Telepsavus bonhourei, see p. 191, pl. iii. figs. 209-213.) 

(6) Gravier, C —Sur la régénération des extrémités du corps 
chez le Chétopteére et chez la Marphyse sanguine, Bull. 
Mus. Paris, 1909, pp. 14-17; Ann. Sci. Nat. (Zool.) 
Paris, sér. 9, t. ix. 1909, pp. 129-155. 

(7) Groupe, E.—Beschreibung neuer oder wenig bekannter 
Anneliden. Arch. f. Naturgeschichte, 1863, p. 52. 

(8) Ivanow, P.—Die Regeneration des vorderen und des 
hinteren Korperendes bei Spirographis spallanzanit Viv. 
Zeitschr, f. wiss, Zool. Bd. xci, pp. 511-558, Taf. 20-22. 

(9) Larrurs, J. Joysux-.—Etude Monographique du Chéto- 
ptére. Arch, Zool. Exp. Gén. sér. 2, t. vii. 1890, 
pp. 245-360, pls. xvi.-xx. 

(10) Lancrernans, P.—Ueber einige canarische Anneliden. 
Nova Acta Leop. Car. Akad. Naturf. Bd. xlii. Nr. 3, 
1881. (For Phyllochetopterus gracilis.) 

(10a) Sars, M.—Fauna littoralis Norvegie, ii. 1856. 

(11) Vaney, C, et Contr, A.— Recherches expérimentales sur la 
régénération chez Spirographis spallanzanti (Viviani). 
C. R. Soc. Biol. 1899, p. 973. 

(12) Watson, A. T.—A Case of Regeneration in Polychet 
ome Proc, Roy, Soc, ser, B, vol. Ixxvii. 1906, 
pp. 332-6, 


. 


POLYCH.EYA FROM THE N.E. PACIFIC. 993 


EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. 
Lettering. 


a.s. Proximal and p.s. distal half of posterior segments. 
cil.gr. Ciliated groove and enl. enlargements of the same to form accessory 
feeding organs. 
d. Dorsal lengthened sete of notopodium. 
Jr. The frilled borders of the median region. 
gl. Glandular epithelium of dorsal surface. 
lab. The two ventral lips of the mouth. 
neur. Neuropodium. 
neur. The undivided neuropodium of the first segment of the median region. 
neur.”, neur.® The double neuropodia of the second and third regions. 
not. Notopodium. 
not.', not.2, not. Notopodia of segments in median region. 
per. Peristomial collar. 
pl. Ventral plastron of anterior region. 
pro. Prostomium. 
st.t. Stumps of peristomial tentacle. 
é. Peristomial tentacle. 
w. Prolongation of the ventral plastron into median region. 


Prate I. 
Mesocetopterus taylori, sp. nu. Departure Bay, B.C. 


Fig. 1. Dorsal view, comprising the anterior and median regions with the first 
segments of the posterior region. 

2. Lateral view of same to show dorsal approximation of the borders (/%.) of 
the median segments, ete. 

3. View of lead from above to show the prostomium completely surrounded 
by the peristomium, and the slit-like mouth bordered by two ventral 
lips. 

(All three figures are drawn about twice the natural size.) 


PrateE II. 
Mesochetopterus minuta, sp.n. Cape Verde Is. 


Fig. 4. Dorsal view showing the well-developed prostomium, continuous ciliated 
groove, absence of frilled borders to median region, ete. X 20. 


Puate III. 
Mesochetopterus. 


Fig.5. Ventral view of IZ. taylori, to show end of anterior and beginning of 
median region. X 3. 

. Lateral view of posterior region in WV. taylori. X 3. 

. Lateral view otf end of median and beginning of posterior regions in 
M. minuta. X 10. 

. Hinder segments of posterior region in MW. minuta. X10. 

. Anterior view of a parapodium in the anterior region of WZ. taylori. 


Puate IV. 


Phyllochetopterus prolifica, sp. nu. 


Fig.10. A colony containing three adult worms, two of which (A, B) have just 
separated off portions (A’, 3’) of the posterior region. The rounded 
original end of the tube is seen at D. t 
Departure Bay, British Columbia. Natural size. 

11. A colony containing at least three adult worms. This shows two important 
lateral branches and a large number of short branches bearing 
apertures. That part of the system represented with close shading is the 
older, the tube-walls being opaque, and that with distinct annulations is 
newer, the transparent walls showing the worms within. (Two of these 
wornis which alinost touch each other, lie in opposite directions.) 

San Juan Archipelago, Washington. Natural size. 
(In both figures, the anterior and median regions of the worm are shown dotted, 
the posterior region very dark. The tentacles are omitted.) 


Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. LX VII. 67 


“I o> 


۩ 00 


994 ON POLYCH ATA FROM THE N.E, PACIFIC. 


Prats V. 
Phyllochetopterus prolifica. 


A series of three individuals showing the stages in the regeneration of the anterior 
region by a posterior fragment containing segments of the median and posterior 
regions. 

Fig. 12. Beginning of regeneration : anterior region represented by a tiny stump. 
Sermentation is indicated by the superficial folds, and the peristomial 
tentacles are seen as two apical outgrowths. 

13. Anterior region is almost complete, but still very small: peristomial 
tentacles short and fourth segment without enlarged sete. 

14, Adult worm with fully formed anterior region. Tentacles completely 
developed. The whole of the posterior region is not shown. 


PratE VI. 
Phyllochetopterus anglica, sp. i. 


Fig.15. A colony containing two fully developed worms. It consists of two 
parallel tubes with short connection. One tube shows the rounded 
original end. Natural size. 

16. A colony consisting of several parallel connected tubes, in part adherent to 
each other. Only one worm was found inhabiting it. Natural size. 


(In both figures, the anterior and median regions of the worm are shown dotted, 
the posterior region black, The tentacles are shown. ‘The tubes where they 
are transparent are shown unshaded, where opaque darkly shaded.) 


1914 WATSON ela 


Bale & Danielsson, Lt? imp. 


BROOMIA PERPLEXA. 


ON A NEW FOSSIL REPTILE. 995 


. Broomia perpleva, gen. et sp. n., a Fossil Reptile from 
South Africa. By D. M.S. Watson, M.Se., F.Z.8., 
Lecturer on Vertebrate Paleontology in University 
College, London. 

[Received June 3, 1914: Read November 24, 1914.] 


(Plate VI.* and Text-figures 1-5.) 


INDEX. 

Page 

Broomiaupenplerd. SeNeeb SPs le) qe... .ceiecsse-escaree cease 1002 
Adelosaurus, gen. u....... SRE Mirae yb 1009 
Description of Skull of Brains eaplicsa ee Soe eee 995 
.; Wertebralicolumimnieente = eee ee ee OOS 

Pe LULU Sipe ERR ee eee oe ssa asnn a eae ye 998 

a Recthoralltoindl meena acca. secs ce ceaeeeeees 1 998 

3 Boreylimippemrennsss-ccteces tock! cieesetaea ences, 1 1909 

- Ilium and liana lisvals Peete eae, LOOO 
Comparison with other groups of Reptiles ..................... 1003 
Generaliconclusion smear ene ee ee OOD 


Whilst collecting on the farm Hottentots Rivier, Field Cor- 
netcy Gouph No. 3, District Beaufort West, Cape Province, from 
the Pariasaurus zone, I was given a lump of the or diene 
quartzitic sandstone of that horizon showing an extremely sharp 
impression of a small lizard-like reptile. By careful development 
I exposed a perfectly preserved car pus and tarsus with the actual 
bone well preserved, and the specimen now allows of a very 
complete account of the animal’s structure. 

Skull—The skull is represented only by an exquisitely sharp 
impression of the buccal surface of the palate, squeezes from 
which show its structure with perfect clearness. 

The basioccipital is not definitely visible, but it may be 
represented by a rather faint impression behind the basisphenoid ; 
it is, however, equally probable that this represents the atlas. 

The basisphenoid is very broad, the lower surface is shallowly 
concave, the lateral borders being raised into low, sharp-edged 
ridges which shghtly separate posteriorly and end in ill-marked 
tubera. Anteriorly the bone bears two well-marked basipterygoid 
processes which, so far from projecting downwards, lie above the 
general level of the lower surface of the bone; they are directed 
forwards, and their flat articulating surfaces are nearly at right 
angles to the length of the skull. Between these processes the 
parasphenoid projects forward as a very narrow rostrum of 
considerable length ; where it joins the basisphenoid it separates 
distinct grooves on each side of the middle line which lead from 
the palate into the skuJl. There is some evidence that the 
parasphenoid terminated behind in a diamond-shaped expansion 
on the lower surface of the basisphenoid. 

There are no carotid foramina. 


* For explanation of the Plate see p. 1010. 


67* 


996 IR. D. M. 8. WATSON ON 


The pterygoid articulates by a pendunculate facet with the 
basipterygoid process ; behind this the posterior ramus runs back 
to the quadrate. It is shown in the specimen as a very narrow 
strip, but in front there are appearances which suggest that the 
part visible is really only a narrow rib on the lower surface of a 
much broader bone, as in Captorhinus. In front the pterygoid is 
not very clearly distinguishable from the palatine and ecto- 
pterygoid. It bears three raised ridges, each covered with a 
granulation of very small, closely-set teeth ; the posterior ridge is 


Text-figure 1. 


Broomia perplexa. Restoration of palate. 2. 


B.Sp., Basisphenoid ; Jw., Jugal; Mer., Maxilla; Pal., Palatine; Par.Sp., Para- 
sphenoid ; Pr.Jfv., Premaxilla; Pr.V., Prevomer; Pé., Pierygoid; Qu., 
Quadrate; Qu.Ju., Quadratojugal ; Tr, Transverse. 


short, directed nearly laterally, and has only a single series of 
teeth; the second ridge is rather longer, directed forward, and 
bears two irregular rows of denticles; the third ridge forms the 
inner margin ef the bone and runs forward as far as the specimen 
allows it to be seen; this ridge is covered with a large number of 
irregular rows of teeth, so that it forms a closely-set granular 
area. ‘The surface of the bone between the dentigerous ridges is 
depressed and between the two anterior ridges has a few smail 
scattered teeth. There is a distinct process applied to the inner 


A NEW FOSSIL REPTILE. QO7T 


side of the lower jaw, not much depressed, and apparently formed 
partly by the ectopterygoid, which bears no teeth. In this region 
there are two small depressions which may be foramina. 

A very remarkable feature is the very large size of the inter- 
pterygoid vacuity ; it is probable that the pterygoids do not meet. 

The palatine is a bone which bears a single dentigerous ridge 
directly continuing the middle one on the pterygoid ; where the 
two bones meet there is a small gap with no teeth; the anterior 
end of the palatine seems to show a natural border at the back of 
the internal nares. 

The maxilla is not well shown, but in its anterior portion 
bears a single row of very closely-set teeth which are wider from 
side to side than they are long; posteriorly the teeth are small, 
separated, and circular. The maxillary teeth seem to be shee 
codont, and are very short and blunt, being directly apposed to 
those of the lower jaw. 

The quadrate is shown on the left side as a rather thick plate 
curved lateral ly, so that its inner border comes into contact with 
the front face of the posterior ramus of the pterygoid, and its 
thin outer border forms part of the outer side of the skull. 

Lying to the outside of the quadrate, but with its thin posterior 
border within that bone, is seen the lower edge of a bone which is 
very short antero-posteriorly. This bone can only be a quadrato- 
jugal or a squamosal. Tightly applied to the outer surface of 
this bone is the extreme tip of another, which might be a 
squamosal if the other be a quadratojugal. 

On the same side, lying in close relation to the posterior end of 
the maxilla, is an ibe shaped bone which can only be the jugal; its 
border all round seems to be a natural one. From its curvature 
it is certain that the long limb cannot have reached back to the 
quadratojugal, but formed the back of the orbit, which must 
have been very large. As the squamosal and quadratojugal are 
in their natural “position and the jugal is displaced, it seems 
certain that there was no lower temporal arcade and that the 
temporal region was cut away from below, as in lizards. 

The lower jaw is in place and the left side of the palate is 
perfectly preserved, so that there is no difficulty in making a 
restoration of the palate. In such a restoration the pointed 
shape and width of the skull are very noticeable, as are the 
enormous interpterygoid vacuity and the fact that the articular 
region of the quadrate lies far in advance of the basioccipital. 

"The lower j jaw of the right side is perfectly preserved and fairly 
well exposed. There is a small splenial entering the symphysis 
and overlapping the angular behind ; the rather larger dentary 
overlaps the outer side of the same bone. The angular is a large 
boat-shaped bone forming the bottom of the jaw behind. ‘The 
surangular and articular are not exposed, but on the left side a 
short, high, very lizard-like coronoid process lies outside the 
pterygo-transverse process. 

The two rami are only loosely connected in front. 


998 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


Vertebral coiumn.—The anterior vertebre are not known, 
having been in the other side of the block, which was not 
recovered. The whole skeleton lies in position, so that from 
measurements it is possible to obtain the length of the missing 
part; if, as seems most probable, the anterior vertebrae were of 
the same length as those behind them, eight are missing, giving 
a total of twenty-four presacrals. All the presacrals preserved 
are much alike in form and size. The centrum is small, with a 
wide hourglass-shaped notochordal canal running through it; it 
is expanded at the articular ends and somewhat constricted in 
the middle ; the lower surface is rounded but slightly flattened. 
The arches are very wide and the neural canal enormous, much 
wider than it is high. The last presacral gives satisfactory 
evidence that the zygapophysial articulating surfaces were flat 
and placed horizontally; the anterior zygapophyses only project 
very slightly, if at all, in front of the centrum. The transverse 
process best seen in the 12th and 13th presacrals is short, and 
extends from a point on the arch near or on the neurocentral 
suture up to the process which supports the prezygapophysis, but 
the articular facet for the rib begins some distance behind its 
anterior end. There are intercentra throughout the column 
except between the sacrals. There are two sacrals of the same 
length as the presacrals; their centra are, however, more robust, 
and have a very pronounced carination of the lower surface. 
The sacral ribs are largely attached to the centra. 

The first five caudal vertebrae, which alone are preserved, are of 
the same length as the sacrals, but the centra are constricted and 
rapidly lose the carination of the sacrals: there are apparently 
intercentra between the first and second and all succeeding caudals, 
but at what point these take the character of hemal arches is 
not shown, although that between the 4th and 5th is a chevron 
bone. ; 

Ribs.—The presacral ribs are all single-headed, holospondylous ; 
their articular end is somewhat swollen but is not very broad, as 
it is in Dicynodon for example. The ribs are long, considerably 
curved, quite slender, and ribbed in front. 

The anterior sacral rib is short and strong; it has a large flat 
surface for the ilium, and arises from the conjoint centrum and 
neural arch rather far forward. The posterior rib is longer, but 
perhaps not so strong as the anterior; it has a very large 
articulation with the ilium, and its distal end is in contact with 
that of the first sacral rib. 

The caudal ribs of the first four vertebre are long simple 
processes fused on to the body of the vertebre. 

There are faint traces of abdominal ribs. 

Pectoral Girdle.—The pectoral girdle is in position, and so far as 
it is shown very well preserved. ; 

The interclavicle is a large bone with a rhomboidal head produced 
at the lateral angles into short processes, and with a very long 
narrow stem. The head has its front edges bevelled off and 


A NEW FOSSIL REPTILE. 999 


recessed for the clavicles, and the under surface of the stem is 
also recessed, apparently for the inner borders of the coracoids. 
This implies that the interclavicle largely lay above the coracoids, 
a feature only paralleled by the Plesiosaurs. The evidence for 
this curious arrangement is very much str engthened by the fact 
that the stem is broken, and the lower part with the right 
coracoid underlying it is pressed up, whilst the left coracoid 
retains its natural position in relation to the anterior end of the 
interclavicle. 

The lower end of the left clavicle is well preserved; it is rather 
wide and thick, lies along the anterior border of the head of the 
interclavicle, and shows a very feeble sculpturing of pits and 
grooves. The coracoid and scapula of each side are fused 
together, and only the lower part of the joint-bone is exposed. 
The coracoid is a large flattish bone with curved borders; it bears 
a strong process which carries the lower and posterior part 
of the glenoid cavity, behind which the bone is continued for some 
distance. There is a small, oval, coracoid foramen in the groove 
which continues the glenoid cavity forward. There is a powerful 
rounded supraglenoid process borne by the scapula, and some 
slight evidence of a glenoid foramen. The right scapulo-coracoid 
shows that the whole bone forms about a quadrant of a circle. 
There is no reason to suppose that more than a single coracoidal 
element was present: this being no doubt, as Williston believes, 
the anterior of the two of the Cotylosaur shoulder-girdle. 

Fore limb.—The upper part of the right humerus is shown 
from below; the left humerus is badly exposed, but shows the 
length of the bone and something of its distal end. The bone is 
very slender; it is slightly expanded at both ends, and no doubt 
somewhat twisted. The head is not well exposed; there is a 
short but relatively powerful radial crest which rather rapidly 
subsides on to the shaft. Of the distal end, all that can be said 
is that it is exceptionally well ossified and finished, with a round 
condyle for the radius, facing at right angles to the shaft, and a 
facet for the sigmoidal fossa of the ulna at the end. 

The radius is a long slender bone slightly expanded at the 
ends. The ulna is a slender bone, with the upper end thickened 
and produced into a very pronounced olecranon process. 

Although the carpus is only a centimetre square its structure 
is shown with diagrammatic clearness on the right side, where 
it is exposed on its palmar aspect and has the actual bone well 
preserved. 

There are three large proximal carpals, anda slight suggestion 
of a small pisiform lying a little removed on the ulnar side. There 
are three centralia which completely separate the proximal and 
distal rows of the carpus. The most ulnar of these is very small, 
articulates with the ulnare, median centrale, and fourth distal 
carpal. The median centrale is one of the largest bones of the 
wrist, articulates with the ulnare, intermedium, radiale, radial 
centrale, third and fourth distal carpals, and the ulnar centrale. 


1000 MR. D. M. 8S. WATSON ON 


The radial centrale is a large bone articulating with the radiale, 
median centrale, and the first three distal carpalia. There are 
five distal carpals, all except the fifth being large bones in 
mutual contact. The fifth isa smailer bone, forming only part 
of the support of the fifth metacarpal. The carpus as a whole is 
remarkable for its thorough ossification and the accuracy of fit of 
its elements, 


Text-figure 2. 


Broomia perplexa. 
Outline drawing of right carpus and manus as preserved. 


R. Radius, U. Ula. XX 2 approx. 


Niwm.—Neither ilium is quite complete, but the two supple- 
ment one another so as to give a good idea of the whole bone, 
There is no preacetabular projection, the blade of the bone ex- 
tending upwards and backwards from the strong process which 
projects over the acetabulum. The outer surface of the bone 
has a strong ridge running horizontally across it, and the upper 
end shows a faint grooving for muscle-insertion. 

The pubis and ischium cannot be exposed. 

The left femur is only shown in section, but the right gives 
some idea of the form of the bone. It is slender and sigmoidally 
curved. The articular facet at the distal end is well rounded ; 
the upper end of the bone is flattened, but bears a strong 
trochanteric ridge. The tibia and fibula are very slender bones 
shown only in section. The left tarsus is beautifully shown; it 
has the bone preserved and is exposed on its dorsal surface. Its 


A NEW FOSSIL REPTILE. 1001 


proximal row consists of two very large flat bones which meet in 
the middle ina long articulation broken by notches which to- 
gether form a small foramen. One of these bones is the fibulare, 
the other in all probability the fused tibiale and intermedium. 
The distal row consists of five bones, of which the fourth is very 
large and articulates with the two proximal tarsals. The first, 
second, and third distal tarsals are separated from the tibiale 
intermedium by two centralia which form a median row in the 
tarsus. 


Text-figure 3. 


Ske: 
OS 
NEN 
NEN 
CEN 
x 
. 
N 


] 


ee 
gd. 
i 


| 


Broomia perplexa. 


Outline drawing of the left hind leg as preserved. X 1. 


The first metatarsal is not exposed; the base of the second is 
seen supported by its tarsal. The third is a slender bone of 
considerable length. The fourth is even longer, being more than 
half as Jong as the fibula. The fifth metatarsal is short, only 
slightly more than half as long as the fourth. In the specimen 
all the metatarsals lie parallel and close up to one another. 

This little animal, as restored in text-fig. 4, is thoroughly 
lizard-like in build and obviously led a lizard-like lite on perfectly 
dry land. It may perhaps, as suggested by its large claws and 
very slender limb, have been to some extent arboreal. 

The little lizard-like animal, almost the whole of whose 
structure is described in the foregoing account, is obviously 
distinct from any known South African form, and as it is the most 
striking new form which I collected in that country, I propose 


1002 MR, D. M. S. WATSON ON 


for it the name of Broomia perplexa, gen. et sp. 0., in token of 
my admiration of Dr. R. Broom’s work on early Tetrapods. In 


Text-figure 4, 


Broomia perplexa. 


Restoration of the skeleton from the ventral aspect with the abdominal 
ribs omitted. X +. 


discussing its systematic position it will, I think, be most con- 
venient to compare it in detail with all the great groups of 


A NEW FOSSIL REPTILE. 1003 


early reptiles which are well enough known to make a com- 
parison of much value, and then to discuss some of the less known 
Permian types which resemble it. 


Text-figure 5. 


Adelosaurus huxleyi (Hancock & Howse). 
Left fore limb and right scapulo-coracoid. X 15. 


From the type-specimen in the Hancock Museum, Newcastle-on-Tyne. 


Comparison with Cotylosaurs. 


The palate with its abundant armature of teeth is somewhat 
similar to that of the Captorhinide, in which the distribution of 
the teeth and even some details, such as the shape of the ptery- 
goids and the length of the parasphenoid, are identical. 

The basisphenoid of Broomia differs, however, from that of all 
known Cotylosaurs in its very great breadth and only very 
slightly marked tubera. i, as seems probable, the side wall 
of the skull was cut away in Broomia, we have a very striking 


4 


1004 MR. D. M. 8S. WATSON ON 

' 
difference, but one which the example of the Chelonia teaches us 
might have occurred very rapidly. 

The vertebral column of Broomia is very similar to that of the 
Captorhinids, having small completely perforated centra, heavy 
neural arches and horizontal zygapophysial articulations, and 
small intercentra. The rib articulations, however, are smaller in 
our type. 

The limb-girdles of Broomia are totally unlike those of any 
Cotylosaur in their great slenderness. The shoulder-girdle differs 
very markedly from that of the Captorhinide, but faintly recalls 
that of Seymouria in its peculiar interclavicle with a diamond- 
shaped head and in the clavicle with its curious expanded lower 
end. The loss of the posterior coracoidal element is paralleled 
by Seymouria, but in that type if I interpret Prof. Williston’s 
description accurately, the real Coracoid was present although it 
was not ossified and contributed to the glenoid cavity, which, as 
in the majority of Carboniferous reptiles, had the peculiar screw- 
shaped form most typically shown in Diadectes and Hryops. 
Traces of this former possession of this type of glenoid cavity are 
to be seen in Broomia, but the conditions there are different, in 
that the whole glenoid cavity is carried by the scapula and the 
single coracoidal element, which extends backward for some 
distance behind it. 

The humerus is distinguished trom that of any Cotylosaur by 
its slenderness, but is probably structurally similar to that of 
Captorhinus. 

The carpus of Broomia is unique, no other form being known 
in which the centralia completely separate the proximal and 
distal rows of carpals. 

The ilium, which alone of the pelvic bones is known in Broomia, 
differs from that of all Cotylosaurs in its slenderness and its 
sloping anterior border. 

The femur is so badly exposed that it is difficult to compare it 
with that of Cotylosaurs, from which, however, it differs in its 
extreme slenderness. The tarsus differs from that of any known 
Cotylosaur in the presence of two centralia. 

These resemblances, particularly those in the vertebral column, 
seem to show that Broomia has descended from some Cotylosaur; , 
the differences, lying chiefly in the build and limb-skeleton, are in 
general advances of an adaptive nature, but the tarsus is the 
most primitive known amongst reptiles, and the carpus cannot at. 
present be explained. 


Comparison with the Therapsid stock. 


Varanosaurus and its immediate allies amon gst the Poliosauridz 


are the most primitive known members of the Therapsid line, 
and as they are comparatively small and lightly built reptiles, 


offer an exceptionally favourable field for comparison with 
Broomia. 


A NEW FOSSIL REPTILE. 1005 


The palate of Broomia is not very unlike that of Varanosaurus, 
but differs in the wide basisphenoid, the very large inter- 
pterygoidal vacuity, and the more abundant teeth. ‘The lower 
jaw of Broomia is quite distinct from that of any Therapsid in 
that it has a boat-shaped angular in place of the characteristic 
flat-notched angular of the Therapsid. The vertebral column is 
also somewhat similar to that of a Poliosaurian, but the neural 
arches are heavier and the rib articulations not so wide. The 
shoulder-girdle differs in that the shoulder-girdle of the Therapsids 
always has a posterior coracoidal element which may be only 
cartilaginous but contributes to the glenoid cavity. 

The dium of Lroomia is strikingly like that of Pacilospen- 
dylus, and not unlike that of Varanosaurus. The foot resembles 
in some ways that of Varanosaywrus and is almost identical 
with that of Ophiacodon, which P.iof. Williston believes to belong 
to that group. 

The difference in the lower jaws shows at once that Broomia 
does not belong to the Therapsid line, and the resemblances 
between Varanosaurus and Ophiacodon and Broomia seem to be 
in general either primitive features or adaptive ones. 

ft have compared roomia with Casea but see no special 
resemblance between them. (Casea is perhaps an extremely 
early offshoot from the Therapsid stock before it had acquired its 
characteristic angular.) 

Broonia has an obvious superficial resemblance to Arwoscelis 
in that they are both very lightly built reptiles of small size. It 
is at present difficult to compare them in detail. From the 
published accounts of W illiston I have been able to find the 
following resemblances :— 

In both there are teeth on all the bones of the palate. If 
Broom’s Ophiodewus, founded on the specimens of ‘ Bolosawrus” 
figured by Case, is really Arwoscelis, then there 1s a very striking 
sunilarity in the palate of the two types, in the large inter- 
pterygoidal space, very long parasphenoid, and general structure. 
The dorsal vertebre are similar in their slender notochordal 
centra and heavy arches. The ribs are similar in having only a 
single slightly expanded head which articulates with the arch 
and centrum near the front end of the vertebra throughout the 
series. The sacrum of dArwoscelis is said to be almost indistin- 
guishable from that of lizards; that of Lroomia also resembles the 
same forms. The tail is long in both types. 

IT can find no characters in which the incompletely known 
humerus of Broomia differs from that of Arwoscelis. The femur 
and tibia of the two types seem to agree. 

The more important known differences between the two types 
are that Arwoscelis retains the primitive two coracoidal elements 
and that there is no trace in that type of the cut-away side of 
the skull of Broomia. At the same time it must be remembered 
that the facts are not certainly known in our fossil and that the 
jugals of the two forms have a considerable resemblance. 


1006 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


On the whole, there is nothing in the known structures of 
these two animals to prohibit a fairly close resemblance between 
them, but until Prof. Williston’s full description is published it 
is impossible to go beyond this. 

By far the most interesting comparison is between Broomia 
and a lizard. 

It is certain that the lizard palate must have been derived 
from one generally resembling that of Lroomia, and it is probable 
that it may have specially resembled that type in the possession 
of a very large interpterygoid vacuity and a very large para- 
sphenoid. 

The basisphenoid of Groomia at once recalls that of a lizard, 
but I know of none that really resembles it. 

The lower jaw of Lroomia is sutticiently generalised to have 
given rise to that of lizards, and very characteristic of that 
group is the short upstanding coronoid process. 

If the side of the temporal region of the skull be really cut 
away in Lroomia, we have a very striking resemblance to the 
Lizard type, where the narrowing of the primitiv ely single arch 
has produced the well-known present-day structure. 

The geckos have notochordal centra and intercentra, as has 
Lroomia. 

The articulation of the single-headed rib of Broomia is 
essentially similar to that of a lizard. The sacrum is also 
sunilar in the two groups of reptiles. 

The pectoral girdle of Broomia is extraordinarily similar to 
that which the primitive lizards must have possessed in the 
following features :— 

The reduction of the coracoidal elements to one on each side: 
this being, as Prof. Williston has pointed out, the anterior of the 
two of primitive reptiles. 

The long slender interclavicle with a rhomboidal head is a type 
from which the characteristic cross-shaped interclavicle of a lizard 
could be derived. A T-shaped interclavicle could not have 
produced this form. 

The somewhat expanded lower end of the clayicle is also a 
feature which was apparently present in the early lizards. 

There is nothing specially characteristic about the bones of the 
fore-leg in lizards, and they could be derived from those of 
Lroomia. 

The carpus of Lroomia differs as much from that of any lizard 
as it does from that of all other reptiles. 

The ium of Sroomia is completely lizard-like in its antero- 
ventral slope. The hind leg of Lroomia is not specially lizard- 
like. 

The only feature which we would expect to be present in an 
ancestral lizard which does not occur in Broomia is that modi- 
fication of the fifth digit, perhaps a divarication, which led to the 
modified fifth metatarsal found in Lizards, Sphenodon, Chelonia, 
Thecodonts, Crocodilia, ete. 


A NEW FOSSIL REPTILE. 1007 


The skeleton of Sphenodon is so thoroughly lizard-like that 
Broomia resembles it nearly as much as it does a lizard, but 
there is pretty clear evidence that there was not a lower temporal 
areade like that of Sphenodon. 

The only other group with which it seems necessary to compare 
Lroomia is the Mesosauria. The skull is unknown in this type. 
The vertebre differ in their much more massive arches, and mm 
the mode of articulation of the ribs. The pectoral girdles of the 
two types are generally similar, but the interclavicle of Jeso- 
saurus is T-shaped. The carpus differs by the absence of 
centralia in Mesosaurus. The pelvis differs in the shape of the 
ihum. The tarsus differs in the complete loss of centralia in 
Mesosaurus. It thus seems certain that the two types have little 
to do one with the other. 

Only two, Heliosaurus and Heliophilus, of the little-known types 
from South Africa agree at all with Broomia. 

Lreomia resembles them in the following features :-— 


1. The sharply pointed but relatively short skull. 

2. The shape of the pterygoid in Heliosaurus. 

3. The position of the quadrate in advance of the basi- 

occipital condyle in Heliosaurus. 

4. The presence of a distinct neck. 

5. The presence of intercentra throughout the vertebral 
column. 

. The heavy neural arches. 

The single-headed ribs. 

The similar number of presacral vertebra. 

. The shoulder-girdle of Heliosauwrus much resembles that 
of Broomia. 

10. The slender limbs. 


These resemblances, although thev are to some extent due to 
the retention of primitive features, do seem to show that there is 
some real connection between the three animals. In /eliosawrus, 
however, as Broom has shown, there is some evidence of the 
presence of a quadratojugal arcade, which is apparently lacking 
in Broomia. When I examined the type-specimen of Heliosawrus 
some time ago I was not specially interested in it, but even at 
that time thought it conceivable that the apparent lower arcade 
might be the upper edge of the lower jaw. Heliosawrus is of 
interest because of the presence over its dorsal region of small 
bony scutes identical with the osteoderms of lizards. 

Of the European forms, Aphelosaurus and Kadaliosaurus from 
the Lower Permian, and Proterosaurus and the animal known as 
Proterosaurus huxleyi from the Upper Permian, present some 
resemblance to Broomia in that they are slender lizard-like 
reptiles. Kadaliosawrus from the Rothliegende of Dresden is 
regarded by Prof. Williston, who has examined its remains, as 
being extremely similar to Arwoscelis : in fact, he stated that there 


1008 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


ave no visible differences between them; it need not, therefore, be 
further considered. 

Apheloswurus is unfortunately very little known, but its 
shoulder-girdle seems very similar to that of Broomia in the large 
size of the coracoidal part. The slender limbs, however, differ in 
the fact that they are all of much the same length, and also in 
the much greater narrowness and compactness of the tarsus. 

The animal is, in fact, so incompletely known that little can be 
said about it. 

Proterosaurus is a very interesting form which is, however, still 
very little known. 

The skull, as known from the single, very imperfect example in 
the College of Surgeons Museum, is pointed and has teeth on 
the palate. There is apparently no evidence of the presence 
of an upper temporal vacuity, and nothing can be said of the 
condition of the temporal region. It differs from Broomia in its 
very long neck and in the enlarged cervicals. 

The vertebre differ in their light neural arches, but the rib 
articulation is essentially similar in the two types. The sacrum 
is fairly well preserved in the Newcastle Museum specimen from 
Fulwell, Durham; it is composed of two vertebre carrying large 
sacral ribs which resemble extremely those of Pacilospondylus as 
figured by Case, and to a less extent those of Broomia. 

The shoulder-girdle has a very large, presumably single, cora- 
coidal element, and a rather slender scapula, ‘The large inter- 
clavicle, with an expanded upper end, is not altogether unlike 
that of Broomia. 

The limbs are considerably more massive than those of Broomia 
and are still very imperfectly known, and, as in that type, the 
hind limbs are considerably larger than the fore. ; 

On our present knowledge of Proterosaurus it is impossible to 
be.certain of its systematic position, but it appears not improbable 
that it has something to do with Lroomia. 

The animal described by Howse and Hancock as Proterosaurus 
hucleyi iz quite distinct generically from Proterosaurus and may 
have no real connection with that animal. 

It is a small form with a long neck in which, however, the 
cervicals are not elongated. The centra are large and biconcave 
and the arches heavy. The ribs are single-headed. There are 
apparently intercentra present. The shoulder-girdle is fairly 
well shown. The scapula is a bone with no special features, and 
the single coracoidal element is very large and singularly lizard- 
like. The clavicle has an expanded lower end. The limb-bones 
are incompletely ossified. 

The humerus is remarkable for the very slight expansion of its 
extremities and the absence of a definite crest. 

There is a small entepicondylar foramen. 

The radius and ulna are small bones with no particular 
characters. 

The left carpus is perfectly preserved. 


A NEW FOSSIL REPTILE. 1009 


There are four large proximal carpals and two well-ossified 
centralia, the radial e which forms part of the border of the 
carpus. 

There are only three (distal carpals, the first, third, and fourth, 
but there is an obvious space for the second, which was either 
cartilaginous or has dropped out. There is certainly no fifth 
carpal, The metacarpals and phalanges are relatively rather 
massive and taper rather rapidly. It is possible that the fifth 
had only two phalanges. 

The ilium is a small bone, only the inner aspect of which is 
known but whose outline is like that of Belodon. 

The affinities of this animal, for which the new genus 
Adelosaurus may be founded, are quite obseure; the fore limb is 
not very unlike that of Sphenodon i in some featur es, and it is not 
improbable that the type may be connected with an Archisaurian 
stoek. 


The preceding discussion will, I think, have shown that 
Broomia cannot be placed in any of the well-known Orders of 
reptiles which occur in the Permian rocks of the world. It seems 
not improbable that it is connected in some way with the earlier 
Areoscelis and with the later lizards, but the absence of all 
knowledge of the temporal region of the skull and what is 
probably still more important, of the neural cranium, makes this - 
resemblance rest on a very insecure foundation, 

Comparison with other slender-limbed Permian forms, so far 
as is possible from the very imperfect material available, shows 
that whilst there are certain general resemblances between them 
there are also many important differences which make it very 
inadvisable to definitely group them together. 

The fact that, whilst we know Almost the whole structure of 
Broomia, we are incapable of doing more than guess, at its 
affinities, owing to the absence of knowledge of the upper part 
of the skull and of the brain-case, shows how very few are the 
characters on which we really rely in estimating the affinities of 
a reptile. 


I am indebted to the Percy Sladen Trustees for assistance in 
visiting South Africa, and especially to G. Gordon, Esq., of 
Hottentots Rivier, to whose interest and hospitality I owe, not 
only the beautiful skeleton of Broomia, but also many other fine 
specimens. I have to thank the authorities of the Northumber- 
Jand and Durham Natural History Society and Mr. E. L. Gill, 
the Director of the Hancock Museum, for permission to examine 
the type-specimen of ‘‘ Proterosaurus hualeyi.” 

Finally, I wish to thank Mr. Pittock, of University College, for 
the excellent photographs from squeezes, and Mr. H. E. Herring 
for the photograph of the block. 

Proc. Zoo. Soc.—1914, No. LX. VIII. 68 


1010 


eS 
= 


mow bh 


oo 


ON A NEW FOSSIL REPTILE. 


EXPLANATION OF PLATE VI. 


Broomia perplexa, gen, et sp. n. 


. Untouched photograph of a squeeze of the palate of the type-specimen. X 1}. 


In this figure the matrix was covered with a thin wash of white before the 
photograph was taken. 


. Pectoral girdle. Photograph as in fig. 1. X 13. 

. Middle dorsal vertebrie. Photograph as in fig. 1. X14. 
. Sacrum. Photograph as in fig. 1. x14. 

. Left ilium. Photograph as in fig. 1. 1%. 


1 
4 


Photograph of the actual’ specimen. X 1. Showing the right hind leg, 
posterior pre-sacral vertebrae, the last three showing clearly the immense 
size of the neural canal, the sacrum, and the caudal vertebrae. 


PZ. Ss, WA WATS ONG aval 


- =~ 


Bale & Danielsson, Lt° imp. . 


EUNOTOSAURUS AFRICANUS. 


MR. D. M. 8S. WATSON ON THE CHELONTA. 1011 


93. Hunotosaurus africanus Seeley, and the Ancestry of 
the Chelonia. By D. M. 8. Watson, M.Sc., F.Z.S., 
Lecturer on Vertebrate Paleontology in University 
College, London. 


[Received June 3, 1914: Read November 24, 1914.] 


(Plate VII.* & Text-figure 1.) 


INDEX. 
Page 
Origin and Structure of the Chelomia ........................... 1011 
Description of Skeleton of Hunotosaurus ..................... 1015 
Relationship of Hunotosaurus to the Chelonia ............... 1019 


The great group of the Chelonia is of unusual interest, because 
it is the only example of a persistent and world-wide Order whose 
structure is entirely dependent on a bizarre specialization : the 
development of the shell. 

Tortoises are first known from the Upper Trias of Germany, 
where they are represented by extremely typical and apparently 
not markedly primitive forms. 

By an analysis of the structures common to all Chelonia, it 
is possible to form some idea of the chief features which must 
have been present in the ancestors of the group. Although 
it is impossible to determine whether or not these characters 
were actually all present together in any type, it will be con- 
venient to add them together to form an imaginary animal 
which may be called ‘ Archichelone.” 

Skull_—The skull of the Chelonia has been discussed by many 
authors, most recently by Hay, whose conclusion is adopted: in 
this paper. 

Since the description of Sphenodon by Dr. Giinther, it has been 
repeatedly pointed out that, in such a type as Chelone with a 
completely roofed skull, the four bones—post-orbital, squamosal, 
jugal, and quadratojugal—which form the lateral temporal arcades 
of Sphenodon are present. If I do not misinterpret their opinions, 
most of those who have discussed the subject believe that the 
skull of Chelone has actually arisen from a two-arched form by a 
secondary enlargement of these bones, until they unite by their 
edges. This conclusion is rendered improbable by the fact that 
some Cotylosaurs, Labidosaurus and Pariasaurus for example, 
whose skulls have certainly always been completely roofed, have 
an identical arrangement of bones in the temporal region. 

' In many Chelonia, apparently without any correlation with the 
animal’s habits other than the power of retracting the neck, the 
temporal region is open; but this opening never results in 
the formation of a two-arched form—in all-cases it has been 


* Por explanation of the Plate see p. 1020. 
68* 


1012 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


arrived at by the eating away of a solid cranial roof either from 
the back or from below. ‘The former process results in the loss 
of a parieto-squamosal connection and the retention of that 
between the jugal and quadratojugal, asin Trionyx: the latter 
produces a skull like that of Chelys, in which the squamoso- 
parietal connection alone persists. Extension of either process 
results in the complete loss of both connections, as in Cistaudo. 

‘The only view which really fits the case is that the primitive 
Chelonian skuil was completely roofed like that of Chelone or 
a Cotylosaurian reptile. This view is supported by the pre- 
ponderance of roofed skulls in early fossil forms. 

It is not at all difficult to derive the Chelonian skull from that of 
a Cotylosaurian reptile. The chief differences in the palate, the 
total loss of teeth, the reduced pterygoids and their firm union 
with the basis cranii, and the rudimentary secondary palate, are 
apparently dependent on the gradual development, of the horny 
beak. The unrelated group of the Anomodontia (Dicynodontia) 
show the gradual extension of a horny beak, followed by the 
total loss of teeth, the reduction of the pterygoid and its close 
union with the basisphenoid, and the development of a small 
secondary palate which in such features as the fusion of the 
prevomeys is extremely like that of a Chelonian. 

Many of the peculiar features of the posterior part of the 
Chelonian skull are due to the necessity of adequately supporting 
the very powerful vertically placed quadrate. 

Other remarkable features in which all Chelonians agree are the 
loss of the postfrontal and prefrontal (or lachrymal), and the 
usual absence of nasals ; with the exception of the last, these losses. 
have repeatedly occurred amongst reptiles. A much more 
striking feature is the loss of the facial processes of the pre- 
maxillee, so that the bony external nares areunited. ‘This change 
is only paralleled in the Mammalia, of which group it is one of 
the most striking peculiarities. 

‘“‘ Archichelone,” then, had a roofed skull with a primitive 
reptilian palate, teeth, probably only a squamosal of the temporal 
elements [and no facial processes of the premaxille]. 

WVeck.—Cope pointed out that all tortoises could be divided 
into two classes according to the mode of retracting the neck, 
either vertically in the Cryptodeira (to which may be added the 
Trionycids and Dermochelys) or laterally in the Pleurodeira. This 
feature to all appearances affords a foundation for an absolute 
division of all known types, a fact the meaning of which is plain. 
‘* Archichelone” must have had a long and flexible neck, capable 
of bending in all directions ; and after the development of the 
shell, w hen it was desirable to withdraw the head for protection, 
the two lines gradually became distinct, any intermediate con- 
ditions being obviously mechanically undesirable. 

, aeAsvall known Chelonia have eight cervical vertebra we are 
eae in claiming that number for “ Archichelone.” 
discussion of the trunk I shall aigsoaen 


THE CHELONIA, 1013 


Dermochelys, as the evidence now seems conclusive that that type 
has originated in Tertiary times from a Cryptodeiran ancestor. 
Inall Chelonia the trunk is very markedly separated from the 
neck and tail, being very broad and completely surrounded by 
the shell. The shell of all Chelonia in which it is not reduced 
has the following structure :— 

There is a median dorsal row of dermal plates. There is 
always a nuchal, sometimes a postnuchal, then eight or fewer 
neurals and one or two pygals. The whole of this series seems to 
be homologous, but the eight neurals are distinguished from the 
other meen Glemients by their definite enmalesion with the 
neural spines of the dorsal vertebra. It seems certain that at 
one time the nuchal ete. were also directly associated with the 
anterior and posterior dorsal and sacral vertebra, and that they 
lost this primitive connection after the formation of the shell, 
either by its exaggerated growth or by a shortening of these 
regions of the vertebral column, so as to allow of the retraction 
of the head and limbs within the shell. 

All Chelonia have a row of costal plates on each side of the 
neurals ; these are invariably eight in number and are fused with 
the dorsal ribs from the second to the ninth. The development 
of these plates shows that they are of purely dermal origin, and 
they may be directly compared with the paired scutes found in 
Crocodiles and many allied reptiles. 

The fact that they have only fused with eight of the ten dorsal 
vertebre shows that these segments in ‘‘ Archichelone ” were in 
some way specialised and distinguished from the first and last 
dorsals. 

The marginal elements of the shell are not correlated with the 
ribs, and perhaps represent a different order of scutes as is 
suggested by Versluys. 

The plastron of Cryptodeires and some Pleurodeires consists of 
a single median and four pairs of plates. In most Pleurodeires 
and Amphichelydia an extra pair of plates is inserted, and in the 
remarkable Triassic Protochersis recently described by Fraas 
two extra pairs. 

The median and the anterior pair of plastrals are universally 
recognised as the interclavicle and clavicles. The other pairs are 
usually homologised with ventral ribs: that they resemble the 
latter in being ventral dermal ossifications is of course true, but 
I do not think it at all follows that they are necessarily derived 
from them. 

There is, for example, never any trace of a median or other 
lateral rows in the plastron of Chelonia, whilst abdominal ribs 
usually have an angulated median and more than one lateral row 
of elements. 

Furthermore, as “ Archichelone ” certainly had a series of dorsal 
scutes comparable to those of a crocodile, it is by no means 
unlikely that it resembled many members of that group in having g 
ventral scutes not homologous with abdominal ribs. 


1014 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 
The fact that in early times tortoises with mesoplastra were pro- 
portionately commoner and more widely spread than to-day, and 
that Triassic forms may have two pairs of mesoplastra, suggests 
that the number in still earlier forms was even greater, and possibly 
- derived from a condition in “ Archichelone” where there was a 
pair of plastrals to each segment of the middle dorsal region. 

The fact that adaptation to aquatic life almost always implies 
degeneration of the shell in Chelonia, shows conclusively that 
“« Archichelone”’ must have been a land form. 

Limb-girdles.—The most striking feature of the limb-girdles of 
Chelonia is that they lie within the shell and ribs. It is plain 
that this condition was gradually acquired after the development 
of the shell by the migration of the pectoral girdle backwards, and 
that further growth of the front and back of the shell which we 
have already found necessary to account for the dissociation of 
the nuchal and pygal elements from the vertebrae to which they 
probably originally belonged. The whole arrangement is designed 
to allow of the retraction of the limbs for protection. 
~ In “ Archichelone ” the pectoral girdle was undoubtedly in the 
usual position overlying the first dorsal ribs, and must have been 
narrow relatively to the bulk of the trunk to allow of its passage 
back within the ribs. 

The pelvic girdle must also have been very narrow. 

This shows that the neck and tail of ‘‘ Archichelone” must have 
been sharply marked off from the trunk by their smaller diameter. 

It is impossible to discover the structure of the limb-girdles of 
primitive Chelonia from those we know; the pectoral girdle 
of a Triassic type recently described by Jackel shows that the 
huge acromion, which is one of the most striking peculiarities of 
the ordinary form, has arisen in comparatively recent times. There 
can be no reasonable doubt but that the girdles of “* Archichelone ” 
were of what Prof. Williston calls the “old fashioned” type, 
i.e., that there were two coracoidal elements and the pelvis was 
“plate-like.” - 

Limbs.—From a study of the mode of walking of land Chelonia 
it seems to be possible to arrive at some conclusions as to 
the type of limbs present in ‘ Archichelone.” In tortoises 
the fore arm and leg are carried nearly at right angles to 
the upper arm and thigh and stand almost vertical, sometimes 
even standing over at the elbow. The humerus and femur are 

carried nearly horizontally and very seldom depressed below the 
level. The animal sways from side to side, so as to bring its 
centre of gravity within the area of support afforded by the three 
legs it stands on whilst the fourth is advanced. 

Some of these features, the standing over at the elbow for 
example, are obviously due to the development of the shell; but, 
even if allowance be made for this, there remains sufficient to 
suggest that the Chelonia were derived from a group with the 
type of humerus found in Lryops and Dimetrodon, which had a 


THE CHELONIA. 1015 


gait of similar character, the humerus being never depressed 
below a horizontal position and moving in a plane which, although 

t does fall towards the back, is more nearly horizontal than 
vertical. These animals certainly swayed from side to side whilst 
walking. 

The Chelonian humerus can be directly derived from the 
reptilian humerus as represented by Varanosaurus. The rounded 
and upturned head is an obvious adaptation to the retraction of 
the limbs. The narrow distal end, so different from the wide 
epicondyyar region of the early forms, depends on the reduction of 
the muscles which lie along the lower surface of the fore arm, and 
are inserted on the entepicondyle, following on the habit, induced 
by the developing shell, of carrying the fore arm vertically. 

The short, powerful, downwardly directed radial and ulnar crests 
seem to depend to some extent, though not completely, on the 
development of the shell as a source of muscle-attachments. 

We may, in fact, take it as probable that ‘ Archichelone” had 
limbs more or less like Zryops or Varanosaurus or Dimetrodon. 


Hunotosaurus africanus Seeley is at present represented by five 
specimens, one of which is in the South African Museum, Cape 
Town, and the other four in the British Museum (Natural 
History). All these specimens agree in including only the dorsal 
region of the animal, and except in the case of the type are 
preserved in nodules, so that in transverse section the ribs form 
an oval rather higher than wide. 

The most nearly complete is No. R. 4054, B.M.N.H. (PI. VII. 
figs. 3 & 4). This is preserved in a very hard nodule and shows the 
general shape. At the anterior end a scapula is in place on one 
side; onthe other end of the specimen we have the impression of 
the anterior face of the first sacral ribs and of the anterior border 
of the ilia. The specimen is thus of importance, because it shows 
that the entire dorsal region is preserved. 

No. 49424, which is also preserved uncrushed in a nodule, 
is not quite complete behind, but in front the shoulder-girdle is 
shown in part. The skull lies with its ventral surface in contact 
with the ventral surface of the body and with its anterior end 
pointed backwards, with the lower jaw articulated. ° 

Weathering has. removed the whole skull to within about a 
millimetre of the dorsal surface of the palate and in the middle 
has even removed the bone from this, leaving a somewhat faint 
impression. ‘This specimen is important, because it alone shows 
the skull and because the position of the head is only possible if 
the neck were fairly long and flexible. 

No. 49423 (Pl. VIL. fies, 1 & 2) is a specimen Tote twice the 
size of the preceding two, and like them preserved uncrushed. 
It shows, well preserved, the whole shoulder-girdle and also im- 
pressions of the humeri from which the bone has weathered 
away. It also shows traces of scutes. 

No. R. 1968. The type-specimen differs from all the otliers in 


S. WATSON ON 


MR. D. M. 


1016 


Text-figure 1. 


Restoration of Hunotosaurus africanua. 


THE CHELONIA,. 1017 


that it is preserved in a relatively soft matrix and has been so 
macerated before burial that the ribs have twisted round on their 
articulations so as to lie nearly flat. 

It shows one pubis and a femur, tibia, and fibula, 

Skull—The skull is very incompletely and rather badly pre- 
served. 

The basisphenoid is broad and provided with basipterygoid 
processes directed forwards in the plane of its flat lower surface. 
There is a rather wide parasphenoid. 

The quadrate clearly lies considerably in advance of the occipital 
condyle. There are numerous teeth on the palate, some scattered, 
but most forming a ridge on the pterygoid. The choane are 
rather large and separated by wide bars of the prevomers, lying 
close up to the maxille and premaxille. 

The maxilla is provided with a single series of small round (?) 
teeth, of which about eight are shown. 

The premaxille also bear teeth, apparently three in each. 

When I first saw the specimen the whole of the extreme 
anterior end of the skull was covered by matrix, which I removed 
with a needle under a Zeiss binocular dissecting microscope. 
Whilst doing so I found no trace whatever of any internarial 
processes of the premaxille, and believe them to have been 
certainly absent; the anterior nares are consequently confluent 
and look directly forward. 

The lower jaw is present but not sufficiently well shown for 
description. 

Except for the evidence given by specimen No. 49424, that the 
neck was relatively long and very flexible, nothing is known of 
this part. 

R. 4054 which, as shown by the position of the limb-girdies, 
has a complete dorsal region, has ten dorsals. These are all fairly 
similar in structure. The first is short, the second somewhat 
longer, and the third very long. The fourth, fifth, and sixth are 
about as long as the third, and the seventh to the tenth show a 
progressive diminution in length. The structure of the individual 
vertebrae is best shown by the type-specimen. The centrum is 
very slender, particularly in the fourth to seventh dorsals, and 
somewhat hourglass-shaped; it is completely pierced by the 
notochordal canal. The rib-facet is carried on a very low and 
small process which in the middle dorsal region is placed at the 
extreme anterior end of the centrum, whilst anteriorly and 
posteriorly it travels back to the middle of its length. The 
neural arch is rather massive when compared with the centrum 
but is still very narrow. It bears very narrow zygapophyses 
which seem to interlock strongly. The upper surface of the 
neural arch is essentially flat, the spine being represented only by 
a low median ridge. The whole arch appears to be placed very 
far forward on the centrum and may overlap on its anterior end. 
There is no definite transverse process, but the ribs seem to touch 
the sides of the neural arch. 


1018 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


The first dorsal vib is a narrow, slightly bent, and quite short 
bone of an ordinary character. The remaining dorsal ribs, from 
the second to the ninth, ave of an extraordinary character. Hach 
is strongly curved, articulates by a facet on its proximal end with 
the face on the centr um, and then rises, until its upper surface 
comes in contact with the neural arch; there is no definite 
tuberculum and the capitulum is extremely feeble. The rib 
then rises above the level of the neural spine so that the dorsal 
surface of the vertebral column lies at the bottom of a groove 
formed by the proximal ends of the ribs. The rib now turns 
outwards and downwards. The ribs widen very rapidly from 
the capitulum, so that until just at the point where they turn 
downwards their lateral borders actually touch. They are of a 
massive character throughout, and each is strengthened by the 
development of a ridge along its visceral surface. 

The rib of the fenbe vertebra is not known, but was certainly 
not expanded like those which preceded it. 

The sacral rib is short and stout. 

The shoulder-girdle is well shown in 49423. In this individual 
the bones of each side have fused, forming a scapulo-coracoid 
which rather strikingly resembles that of Procolophon. The 
scapula has a fairly narrow blade with a straight anterior edge, 
which has no specialised acromion. ‘The preco‘acoid is a bone 
of triangular shape lying flat on the ventral surface. This 
results in the scapulze being set not, as usually, in planes parallel 
to the principal plane of the body, but inclining together in front, 
so that the opening between them towards the neck is very much 
narrower than that towards the dorsal region. This implies that 
the neck was narrow. 

The precoracoid apparently contributes to the glenoid cavity, 
and is pierced by a foramen which, exactly as in Pr ocolophon, is 
protected by a rounded ridge along g its front border. The 
coracoid is a small bone extr emely like that of Procolophon. 

The clavicle is a narrow bone running down the entire front 
edge of the scapula and then turning slightly in to the inter- 
clavicle. 

The interclavicle is a long slender rod with a slightly expanded 
anterior end which is covered by the inner ends of the clavicles. 

The humerus is only incompletely shown. 

The nearly complete immature bone in 49424 is badly preserved, 
but shows that the bone is narrow and suggests that the deltoid 
crest was small. 

The impressions in 49423 show that there was a definite head 
which is slightly upturned, and that there was an unusually large 
but very short ulnar crest. 

The pelvis is represented by the hadly preserved impressions 
of the anterior borders of the ilia (and pubes 2?) in’R. 4054, and a 
perfect pubis in the type. The ilia have a narrow and straight 
anterior border and are as high as the space between them. The 


THE CHELONIA. 1019 


pubis is a small square bone with a foramen, and shows that the 
pelvis was plate-like. 

The femur of the type is a slender sigmoidally curved bone with 
not very well ossified ends and no very marked characters. 

The tibia and fibula stand in the specimen at right angles to it ; 
in natural articulation thei short stumps present no features of 
interest. 

Dermal bones are only shown in 49423, 

Tn this individual, in the anterior dorsal region a small patch of 
what is undoubtedly bone substance is shown lying at a con- 
siderable distance above the ribs and neural arches. This is 
clearly divided into pieces, one of which forms a small round ridge 
in the middle line. The rest of the patch shows a dividing line 
running longitudinally and a transverse division apparently 
coincident with the line where the two ribs below it meet. On 
the posterior end of the specimen, at the same distance above the 
ribs, a narrow line of bone is seen in transverse section. This 
specimen gives conclusive evidence of the actual presence of 
dermal ossifications ; but these are so incompletely preserved as to 
make any statements of their distribution of very slight value. 
There seem, however, to have been a median series nnd lateral 
rows. 

The other specimens have no matrix preserved outside the ribs, 
so that the scales cannot be seen in them. 

The chief features of the structure of Kunotosauria as shown 
by these specimens may be summarised as follows :— 

The skuli is small, with a wide basisphenoid, a palate of the 
ordinary primitive reptilian type with many teeth, teeth in the 
maxille and premaxille. The external nares are confluent, there 
being no internarial processes of the premaxille. The neck is very 
flexible and sharply marked off by its narrowness from the 
trunk. 

There are ten dorsal vertebre of a slender character with nearly 
obsolete neural spines and with rib-facets far forward on the 
centra 

The first and last dorsal ribs are of an ordinary character, but 
the remaining eight are so extremely broadened as to touch one 
another by their edges. As shown by the uncompressed speci- 
mens, particularly R. 4054, the dorsal region was strongly convex, 
and the body was nearly circular in section. 

The very small relative size of the pelvis shows that the tail 
was separated from the trunk by its much inferior diameter. 

The pectoral and pelvic girdles are of ordinary “ old- fashioned ”” 
type. 

The dorsal region is covered with dermal ossifications, of which 
there are apparently median and lateral series. 

It will be noticed that so far as the structure is known, Huno- 
tosaurus agrees exactly with the hypothetical ‘‘ Archichelone” 
arrived at by a discussion of the structure of the known Chelonia. 


1020 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON THE CHELONIA. 


Not only is this the ease, but in many respects it hasa resemblance 
in details even to modern Cheijonia which is very remarkable. 
For instance, the long and extremely slender vertebrx are quite 
tortoise-like, and in the fact that the capitular facet is placed very 
far forward on the centrum we have a suggestion of that inter- 
central rib-articulation which is so striking a feature of the 
mid-dorsal region of modern Chelonians. The way in which this 
rib-articulation travels backwards on the posterior dorsals is 
exactly similar to the condition in Homopus. The anterior 
position of the neural arch on each dorsal centrum is prophetic of 
the modern Chelonian arrangement in which each arch stands on 
two centra. The loss of a definite tuberculum on the dorsal ribs 
is suggestive of the complete loss of that articulation in Chelonia. 

The development of a short, powerful ulnar crest on the 
humerus and the slight upturning of its head are also re- 
semblances to the same group. 

In fact, although our knowledge of Hunotosaurus is too small to 
admit of a definite statement to that effect, it is by no means 
improbable that it is an actual ancestor of the Chelonia. Whether 
it be or not it does, I think, give us a great many suggestions of 
the changes which must have taken place during the development 
of the Chelonian shell and all that it implies. 


T have to thank Drs. A. Smith Woodward and C. W. Andrews 
for their kindness to me during my work at the Natural History 
Museum, and Dr. L. Péringuey for permission to examine the 
South African Museum specimen of Hunotosaurus. The Rev. J. 
H. Whaits was the finder of R. 4054, the best existing specimen 
of this rare type. 

Finally, my discussion of “ Archichelone ” owes much to the 
well-known work of many authors, amongst whom Drs. L. Dollo, 
O. P. Hay, W. R. Weiland, and J. Versluys are specially 
noticeable. When discussing so complex a subject as Chelonian 
ancestry it is impossible, if the result is to be at all clear, to 
attribute each part to its original author, a fact which must be 
my excuse for not acknowledging my indebtedness in detail. 


EXPLANATION OF PLATE VII. 


Eunotosaurus africanus Seeley. 


Fig. 1. Dorsal view of specimen No. 49423. .S., lateral scute; M.S., median 
scute. 
2. Ventral view of same. Cl., clavicle; Cov., coracoid; H., impression of 
humerus ; J.Cl., interclavicle; Sc., scapula. 
3. Lateral view of specimen No. R.4054. I7.,ilium: Sec., scapula; I-iX., ribs. 
4. Oblique dorsal view of same; I-X., ribs. 


All the figures rather less than natural size. 


ON SOME CARNIVOROUS THERAPSIDS. 1021 


54. Notes on some Carnivorous Therapsids. By D. M.S. 
Watson, M.Se., F.Z.S., Lecturer on Vertebrate Pals- 
ontology in University College, London. 
[Received June 3, 1914: Read November 24, 1914. |} 
(Text-figures 1-7.) 


INDEX. 

Page 
Description of Bauria cynops . tek sist on aclawichienionnane ese LOST 
x Micr Cooma GURGaCHORE cvadeseueesee LOLS 
33 Sesamodon . Jee 1025 

Discussion of the Saletoaenine ae the. iBaunides on ine 
Cynognathide .............. Smiqiicasnetaen VLOQG 
Description of the Brain-case of Seymnognathus sSeaters ewes Ode 
e 35 Quadrate region in the Gorgonopsids...... 1034 
is 5 Palate of Dycoswehus  ..............0--------» 1035 


During the last ten years a very large number of perfectly 
distinct genera and species of Carnivorous Therapsids from 
S. Africa have been described, but of the vast majority of these 
we know only the dentition or at most the outside of the skull. 

This paper is intended to indicate the very great differences 
which may occur in these types, and to show how caution is 
necessary in extending any morphological fact discovered in any 
form even to its apparently close relatives. 


Bavuria cynors Broom, (Text-fig. 1.) 


‘Daring my visit to S. Africa I collected from the Cynognathus 
zone of Essex, Dist. Albert, a small “ Cynodont” skull; which, 
when I found it, was very much weathered and broken into 
innumerable pieces. These fit together and give us a nearly com- 
plete but somewhat crushed skull, which is curiously preserved, 
the bones being very well preserved i in some parts and completely 
weathered away in others. The dentition is perfectly preserved. 

The skull is considerably smaller than that of the type-specimen 
of Bauria cynops, but direct comparison with a cast of that 
example and with Dr. Broom’s figures of it, shows no features in 
which they differ. 

The incisors are large and not of circular section; they are 
bluntly pointed, and there is a worn face on the posterior surface 
of each, so that they are sub-scalpriform. 

The canine is nearly circular in section. 

There are ten cheek-teeth visible in the upper jaw, of which 
the well-preserved crowns of the first and last four are preserved. 
They show no trace of cusps, but are ground down smooth in 
such a manner as to suggest a rodent- like movement of the jaw. 
There is a short diastema before and behind the canine. : 

The lower dentition is not so well known; the lower incisors 
are not markedly flattened anteriorly, and do not show clear 


1022 MR. D. M. 8. WATSON ON 


wear-facettes on their anterior faces corresponding to those which 
they undoubtedly made on the upper teeth. They are succeeded 
at once by the canines. 

The lower cheek-teeth are slightly narrower from side to side 
than the upper teeth, and are convex, grinding on the concave 
upper crowns. 


Text-figure 1. 


Bauria cynops Broom. 


Restoration of palate, from a specimen collected by the author at Essex, 
Dist. Albert, C.P.. x 1. 


The palate is quite well shown in the specimen, but in some 
regions ouly in impression. 

There is a secondary palate, which, however, does not extend 
nearly so far back as in Diademodon, and of which the posterior 
borders meet in a very acute angle (7. ¢. it has only just closed 
up). The posterior nares are divided by a septum, presumably 
formed by a median vomer. Posteriorly the roof of the narial 
passage slopes down very rapidly. Just behind the last maxillary 
tooth on each side the palate is pierced by a large suborbital fossa, 


SOME CARNIVOROUS THERAPSIDS. 1023 


bounded on the outside by a narrow bar which is certainly trans- 
palatine. The pterygoid no doubt combines with this bone to 
form the relatively small flange against the inner side of the lower 
jaw. Behind this region the two bones are separated by a small 
interpterygoid vacuity, which is shown quite conclusively to be 
undivided, no parasphenoid crossing it as is usually the case in 
early Therapsids. 

The inner edge of the pterygoid, which forms the border of 
this vacuity, rises, when viewed from below, until it meets its 
fellow, and the two then end in suture with the very deep keel of 
the basisphenoid. 

From the pterygoid at the side of the interpterygoid vacuity 
the posterior ramus runs off. It has a deep flange down its outer 
border and a horizontal ledge on the inner side. The pterygoid 
ramus of the quadrate runs along the front face of this bone as in 
all reptiles, whilst in the Cynognathids, in which the apparent 
posterior ramus of the pterygoid is really formed by the alisphe- 
noid (=epipterygoid), it runs behind. 

With the skull of Bauria described above are some very badly 
preserved posteranial bones. The scapula is fairly well preserved, 
and seems to show that the blade was narrow and had no spine 
and no definite acromion. 

The coracoid and precoracoid are also shown; they are of the 
ordinary South-African Therapsid type, but are relatively very 
large. The whole arrangement must have closely resembled that 
figured by Dr. Broom in /etidosaurus. 


MiICROGOMPHODON OLIGocyNus Seeley. (Text-fig. 2.) 


Another Cynodont which must be regarded as a close ally of 
Bauria is Microgomphodon oligocynus, known only by the type- 
skull. [The fine skeletal fragment which Seeley referred to this 
-genus is shown by the very unsatisfactory jaw fragment to he 
quite distinct, being, no doubt, a Cynognathid. | 

ape type-skull is illustrated with slight restoration in text- 
fig. which should be compared with Prof. Seeley’s excellent 
Tcheewenie figures (Phil. Trans. 1895, B, pl. i. figs. 1-4). The 
animal resembles Bawria in the following respects :— 


The short temporal region. 

The relatively heavy face. 

The dentition. 

The presence of an interpterygoid vacuity. 

The presence of suborbital vacuities. 

The slight reduction of the posterior part of the lower 
jaw. 

7. Small squamosal, 
8. The nostril directed more anteriorly than outward. 
9. The nasal not widened. posteriorly. 

10. The frontal entering into the orbital margin. 


SOU oe bo 


The upper incisors are subscalpriform and worn, exactly as in 


1024 MR. D. M. 8. WATSON ON 


Bauria, and the very large and procumbent lower incisors are also 
very markedly chisel-shaped. There seems to be little doubt but 
that the wear of these teeth is similar to that of rodent incisors 
and that the front of the tooth was harder than the back, although 
the teeth seem to be enamel-covered all round. 


Text-figure 2. 


Microgomphodon oligocynus. X 1. 


A. Restoration of skull from the dorsal aspect. From Prof. Seeley’s 
ty pe-specimen. 
B. Restoration of skull from the side. 


A curious feature of this type, shared also but in a less marked 
degree by Bauria, is the very great space between the posterior 
ramus of the pterygoid and the paroccipital process. 


SOME CARNIVOROUS THERAPSIDS. 1025 


SESAMODON. 


Another type which has to be brought in connection with 
Bauria is Sesamodon. This type is probably represented in the 
British Museum by the anterior part of a skull broken off through 
the middle of the orbits. Part of the dentition is fairly well 
preserved. The skull, so far as it goes, is of exactly the same size 
and proportions as the type, but differs markedly from Dr. Broom’s 
restored figure in that the lower canine does not bite outside 
the maxilla but inside, in the usual way among Therapsids. As 
Dr. Broom’s type-specimen is extremely weathered and badly 
preserved, it is quite possible that the part of the maxilla outside 
this tooth was removed by weathering. 

In any case, judging only from Dr. Broom’s figures of the type- 
specimen, the animal resembled Lawria in the following ways :— 


Short temporal region. 

The heavy face. 

The general features of the dentition. 

The small squamosal. 

The feeble postorbital arch. 

The frontal forming part of the orbital margin. 

The nasal not widened posteriorly. 

The prefrontal excluding the lachrymal from the nasal. 

The interpterygoid vacuity, and the great distance between 
the posterior ramus of the pterygoid and the paroccipital 
process. 


COON A Tp oo bo 


The group, which may be called the Bauridee, including these 
three reptiles, differs from the Cynognathide (Cynognathus, Dia- 
demodon, and Trirachodon) and the Nythosaurid in the following 
series of characters :— 
1. The short temporal region. 

[2. The heavy face. ] 

3. The nostril directed more forward than outward. 

The nasal not widened posteriorly. 

The frontal forming part of the orbital margin. 

The powerful incisors and grinding “ molars.” 

. The small squamosal. 

8. The large septomaxille on the face. 
9, The interpterygoid vacuity. 

10. The suborbital vacuity. 

11. The great distance between the posterior ramus of the 
pterygoid and the paroccipital process. 

lla. The absence of the long narrow bar formed by the 
pterygoids and parasphenoid behind the region of the 
transpalatine. 

12. The presence of a quadrate ramus of the pterygoid. 

13. The posterior position of the notch in the angular and the 
large size of its reflected lamina. 

14. The lack of an acromion and spine on the scapula. 

15. The large coracoidal elements. 


Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. LXIX. 69 


(SU) 


1026 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


"hese characters are, of course, of very different values, but, 
taken together, do show that the Bauridee differ enormously from 
the Cynognathide. 

It may be argued with an appearance of truth that these 
characters are all merely primitive ones, and that the Bauridee 
are derived from the same near ‘“ Cynodont” ancestor as the 
Cynognathids, but, although much specialised in some ways, are 
retarded in other features. This is in essence the view that 
Dr. Broom stated of Bauria in the form of a genealogical tree 
in December 1911, and which, I believe, he still holds. 

IT endeavour to show in the remainder of this paper that 
Dr. Broom’s view is now untenable. ‘The method I employ 
is to discuss, with the aid of a series of specimens, of which the 
relative ages ave known, the evolution of certain selected features 
of the skull of a Gynognathid, and then endeavour to show that 
the conditions in the Bauridee could not have been derived from 
those in any, except perhaps the earliest, of these stages. 

The series of forms | shall use are :-— 

Dimetrodon; Upper Carboniferous ¢ or Avtinskian. 

* Arctops willistoni, gen, et sp. n.; Hndothiodon zone? Middle 
Permian ¢ or earlier. 

Scymnognathus whaitsi? Broom; Hndothiodon zone. Middle 
Permian. 

Arctognathus curvimola (Owen); Cisticephalus zone. Upper 
Permian. 

Diademodon; Cynognathus zone. Middle Trias. 

The first of these is a North-American Pelycosaur, and the last 
a South-African Cynognathid. The other three are South-African 
Gorgonopsids. It is certain that they are not actual ancestors of 
one another, but they may be as nearly related as the animals 
included in the early phylogenies of the horse. 

Baur, Case, and v. Huene have published more or less complete 
accounts of the occiput of Dimetrodon, and I am indebted to the 
extreme kindness of Prof. 8. W. Williston for the gift of a magni- 
ficent specimen which has been of the utmost use to me. Dinetro- 
don has a large, round occipital condyle, in front of which the 
thick basioccipital forms the narrow floor of the brain-cavity, and 
articulates at the sides with the exoccipitals and opisthoties, 
which are usually distinct. The opisthotics form powerful par- 
occipital processes lying below the small post-temporal fossz. 
The small exoccipitals lie on the extreme posterior surface, 
projecting at the sides into processes which run outwards towards 
the post-temporal fosse far above the bottom edge of the par- 
occipital processes. The whole bone looks as if it had only 
recently become a part of the skull, and was still only very 
imperfectly connected with the rest of the occiput. The foramen 
jugulare lies high up at the back of the skull between the lower 

* Wounded ona skull in theG. G. Bain collection, B.M.N.H. R. 4099, from Howse’s 


Port. It is distinguished by the extreme width of the parietal region and the small 
size of the orbit. 


SOME CARNIVOROUS THERAPSIDS. 1027 


edge of the lateral process of the exoccipital, the opisthotic, and 
the basiocecipital. 

The front face of the paroccipital process is formed by the 
pro-otic, and its lower surface is channelled. ‘The fenestra ovalis 
is a large, irregular hole, not bounded by bone in front, lying 
below the level of the base of the basioccipital condyle. The 
special process of the opisthotic which forms its posterior border 
has a wide, smooth face looking forwards and outwards, and is 
supported on the inner side by a corresponding process from the 
basioccipital. 

The basisphenoid, as shown by Case’s figures, has large tuber: 
reaching back towards the fenestra ovalis, and powerful basi- 
pterygoid processes of a more or less ordinary character. 

The basicranial and otic region of the very primitive Gorgon- 
opsid Arctops closely resembles that of Dimetrodon. It has a 
large, round basioccipital condyle and a thick basioceipital which 
supports the exoccipitals and opisthotics. The paroccipital pro- 
cesses are very powerful, lying below the small post-temporal fosse. 
The exoccipitals are extremely similar to those of Dimetrodon, 
lying on each side of the foramen magnum and sending a special 
process out towards the post-temporal fossee. The exoccipital 
even in this type is only incompletely included in the occiput. 
The foramen jugulare is high up on the back of the skull. 

The front face of the paroccipital process is formed by the 
pro-otic, and its lower border and front face are channelled by 
a groove at the inner end of which lies the large and rather 
irregular fenestra ovalis. This is placed at about the level of the 
lower surface of the basioccipital condyle, and is completely 
enclosed by bone. 

The basisphenoid forms two very large tubera, between which 
is a deep depression terminated abruptly in front by the junction 
of ridges from the tubera to form a very deep median keel con- 
tinuous with the parasphenoid. 

The tubera basisphenoidalia are far back, and end in a ridge 
just in front of the fenestra ovalis. 

The basipterygoid processes are curious horizontal plates 
standing out from the sides of the flat, vertical plate which 
forms the whole anterior part of the basis cranii. 

Scymnognathus whaitsi* differs far more from Aretops than 
the latter does from Dimetrodon in this region. 

The basioccipital condyle is no longer round, but forms a mere 
lip round the lower border of the foramen magnum. The whole 
arrangement is so remarkable that if I had not myself removed 
the thin skin of matrix surrounding it, I should not have believed 
it possible. This lip is no doubt partly formed by the exoccipital, 
as it extends up round the sides of the foramen magnum. 


* This is the specimen the lower jaw of which I described under the name 
Seymnosuchus whaitsi, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 8, vol. x. p. 578, fig. 3. Iam 
not certain of the identification. 

69* 


1028 MR. D. M. 8S. WATSON ON 


The basioccipital is a very thin bone, articulating as usual with 
the exoccipitals and opisthotics. 

The exoccipital is an exactly similar bone to that of Arctops. 
The paroccipital process is very shallow, so that the foramen 
jugulare lies much nearer the bottom of the skull, and actually 
looks as much downward as backward. The front face of the 
paroccipital process is slightly channelled, and the fenestra ovalis 
lies at the inner end of this groove above the level of the basi- 
occipital condyle. It is a comparatively small hole surrounded 
by a smooth and badly-preserved area of bone. 

The tubera are much lower and much further forward than in 
Arctops, the lower surface of the basisphenoid being only com- 
paratively slightly depressed. 

The basipterygoid process is very similar to that of Arctops, 
but seems to be pierced by a canalis Vidii. 

It is at once obvious that most of the differences between this 
type and Arctops are due to a reduction in depth of everything 
which lies below the bottom of the foramen magnum. 

The type and only existing skull of Arctognathus is unfortu- 
nately damaged so that nothing behind the fenestra ovalis is 
visible. In this form the basioccipital is even thinner than in 
Seymnognathus, and the fenestra ovalis lies above the bottom of 
the foramen magnum. The tubera basisphenoidalia are repre- 
sented only by the thickened margins of the slightly concave 
triangular lower surface. The basipterygoid process is similar to 
that in Seymnognathus, but is relatively further forward. 

In Diademodon the basioccipital is so thinned that the centre 
part of the thin lip-like condyle of Seymnognathus is pinched out 
altogether, leaving the two condyles, which are no doubt mainly 
exoccipital. Although no definite suture has ever been seen, the 
texture of the bone makes it certain that the exoccipital in 
Diademodon is a small triangular bone forming the lower margin 
on the extreme back of the skull. The fenestra jugularis les 
entirely on the lower surface and does not face in the least 
backward. The paroccipital process is more massive than in 
Scymnognathus owing to the fact that the post-temporal fosse lie 
above the level of the foramen magnum. ‘The front face is 
channelled, and the fenestra ovalis les at the inner end of the 
groove considerably above the lower margin of the foramen 
magnum. 

The tubera basisphenoidalia are very reduced, being merely 
the thick edges of the nearly flat ventral surtace of the triangular 
basisphenoid. 

The horizontal basipterygoid process is similar to that of 
Scymnognathus, but much further forward. 

Arctognathus is in all visible features of this region exactly 
intermediate between Scymnognathus and Diademodon. 

Comparison of these descriptions with text-figs. 3 and 4 will 
show that the changes take place quite regularly with time, and 
that all of them depend eventually on the reduction of the 
whole regions which lie below the base of the brain, a reduction 


SOME CARNIVOROUS THERAPSIDS. 1029 


which is shown extremely clearly in the three drawings of text- 


fig. 3. 
Text-figure 3. 


Occipital views of the skulls of :— 
A. Diademodon. | 
C. Arctops willistoni, gen. et sp. n. 


Foramen jugulare ; 
Interparietal ; B.Sp., Basisphenoid. 


B. Scymnognathus whaitst ? 


Par.Oc., Paroccipital process ; XS: Fixr.Oc., Exoccipital ; 
Sq., Squamosal ; Tab., Tabulare; I.Par., 


1030 MR. D. M. 8S. WATSON ON 


Now, according to Dr. Broom’s figure of the occiput of the 
type-skull of Bauwria, the basioccipital condyle is large and 
rounded, much more like that of Avctops than any other of the 
series described above. The fenestra lies far above the bottom 
of the occiput, looking directly backwards. There is no trace of 
the gradually developed triangular lower surface of the basi- 
sphenoid which is so characteristic a feature in Cynognathids. 
In fact, it seems quite certain that the basicranial region of 
Bauria is the product of an utterly different type of change from 
that which has led to that of Diademodon, and as the features of 


Text-figure 4. 


WW 


i 
HI 
q 


Await PEN 2 (i 


PNM 
Auli tl(l 
NG 


The occipital and otic regions of :— 


A. Dimetrodon. 

B. Arctops willistoni. 

C. Seymnognathus whaitsi ? 
D. Diademodon. 


Viewed from below and the right side. 


Tub., Tuberosities of basisphenoid; Oc.C., Occipital condyle; X., Foramenjugulare ; 
B.Pt,, Basipterygoid process ; 7.Ov., Fenestra ovalis, 


SOME CARNIVOROUS THERAPSIDS. 1031 


this region in the Hndothiodon-zone Gorgonopsid Scymnognathus 
are obviously prophetic of those of Cynognathids, it will follow 
that the Bauride have had a quite different ancestry since that 
time, which is long anterior to the development of a ‘‘Cynodont ” 
structure—7. e, a secondary palate in any form. 

This conclusion, if true, will necessitate the splitting up of the 
Order ‘* Cynodontia,” and the recognition that it includes at least 
two distinct branches which were separate when they indepen- 
dently acquired a secondary palate. 

The detailed structure of the palate of any Gorgonopsid is 
not known beyond the possibility of doubt. 

All Gorgonopsids which I have seen agree in the following 
features :— 

lst. There is a long region in front of the basisphenoid in 
which the two pterygoids are in contact, apparently with a 
median parasphenoid, but perhaps for part of the distance with 
each other, and in which their lateral margins are parallel ; 
that the whole forms a narrow bar behind the powerful descending 
processes of the pterygoids. 

2nd. If an interpterygoid vacuity is present it is very small, 
and lies just between the descending flanges of the pterygoids. 

3rd. There is a deep groove down the middle of the posterior 
part of the palate. 

Ath. There are no suborbital vacuities. 

5th. There are very large posterior nares, which are separated 
by a bar lying considerably above the level of the lower edges of 
the maxille, which tend to be approximated. 

No skull I have seen shows all the sutures on the palate satis- 
factorily. The skull of Arctops shows many of them, but most 
unfortunately, owing to its having been split longitudinally, 
those in the middle are not clearly visible posteriorly. 

The type-skull of Goryonops shows many sutures in a rather 
indefinite manner. 

As Dr. Broom has pointed out. the bar which divides the pos- 
terior nares in Gorgonops and many othe: forms is actually single. 
It has to be considered whether, like the single *‘ vomex” of the 
Anomodonts, it 1s really composed of a pair of fused prevomers, 
or whether it is a parasphenoid. Its complete resemblance in 
shape, even to the grooves on its upper surface for Jacobson’s 
organs, to the undoubted prevomers of many Therocephalia, 
suggests that it is to be interpreted in the same way; and in the 
type-skull of Arctops it actually seems to be double when seen in 
section on the anterior end of the specimen, about one centimetre 
in front of the posterior end of the posterior nares. In this 
specimen, in place of the single dorsal ridge which occurs in 
Scymnognathus, there are two recs than a millimetre apart, and 
the groove between them seems to be continued by a suture into 
the palate. If this observation is correct, and the condition of 
the specimen in this region is not good enough for certainty, then 
there can be no doubt Siipats the bar between the palato-nares in 


1032 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


Gorgonops is really composed of a pair of prevomers fused, just as 
is the rather similar bone in the Anomodonts. 

In the type-specimen of Gorgonops it seems clear that there is 
no median suture down the palate between the posterior nares and 
the very small interpterygoid vacuity. On the other hand, there 
seems to be very indefinite sutures along the side walls of the 
median groove of the palate, exactly in the position where the 
sutures between the vomer and palatines and pterygoids lie in 
Diademodon. 

Tf this: be so then Gorgonops will have a large mammalian 
vomer in the posterior part of its palate and a fused pair of pre- 
vomers anteriorly. 

In Aretops, which is much more primitive than Gorgonops, 
there is some evidence suggesting that the pterygoids reached 
forward to the prevomers. 

Comparison of the series of characters recorded above as 
features of the Gorgonopsid palate with the similar series on 
p- 1022 of this paper referring to Lauria, will show that Lauria 
differs in its palate in exactly the same manner from Gorgonops 
as it does from Diademodon. 

In fact the Gorgonopsid palate, as I have previously pointed 
out, presents a very close resemblance to that of the Cynognathids, 
a resemblance which is much more striking in the advanced 
Arctognathus than in the more primitive Gorgonops. 

If the interpretation of the structure of the palate of Gorgonops 
given above be correct, then the only differences between it and 
that of a Cynognathid are the development of a secondary palate, 
the beginnings of which are seen in that type, and the concurrent 
reduction of the prevomers; a change which is paralleled in 
Crocodiles. 

Amongst the other characters, of which a progressive and 
orthogenetic change is seen in this series of skulls, are the occiput 
and the temporal region. 

The occiput of Arctops (text-fig. 3C) is very nearly flat, with 
a minute foramen magnum and only very slight projecting ridges 
formed by the tabulares and squamosals. It only differs from 
that of the Deinocephalian Z%itanosuchus in the slightly greater 
spread of the squamosals. In particular, it resembles this animal 
in the very great breadth of the interparietal. 

In Scymnognathus (text-fig. 3 B) the occiput is deeply concave 
and the squamosals very wide. The interparietal is very much 
narrower than in Arctops. 

In Diademodon (text-fig. 3 A) the occiput is very concave and the 
interparietal narrow. This form, however, differs pronouncedly 
from the Gorgonopsids in its very largely developed squamosals, 
a feature not shown in the Nythosaurians which seem to be 
related to it. 

In the temporal region Arctops is remarkable amongst Gorgon- 
opsids for the extraordinary width of the parietal region and the 


[s)) 


SOME CARNIVOROUS THERAPSIDS. 103 


shortness of the temporal fosse, which are only about half as long 
as the width of the parietal bone. 

In Scymnognathus the parietal region is much narrower, and 
the temporal fossz nearly as long as the parietal region between 
them is wide. 

In Arctognathus the temporal fosse are longer than the parietal 
region 1s wide, and in the Cynognathids they are very long, and 
the parietals form a narrow crest. 


Brain-cavity of Scymnognathus. 


The specimen of ‘ Seymnognathus” shows the brain-cavity, 
although, owing to the hardness of the matrix with which it was 
filled, this is not very well preserved. Its main features are, 
however, quite certain, but it does not merita lengthy description. 
The general structure will be best understood from text-fig. 5. 


Text-figure 5. 


The brain-cavity of Scymnognathus whaitsi ? in sagittal section. X 1. 


There is a distinct resemblance to Diademodon owing to the 
comparatively thin basioccipital and the large opening to the 
vestibule through the posterior end of which the tenth nerve had 
its exit. The general features of the vestibule recall Diademodon, 
but there is no visible trace of a cochlea. 

The chief differences from the more recent animal are that the 
whole cavity for the cerebellum is very much smaller, and that 
its bage rises very rapidly in front, very much as it does in 
Dimetrodon. 

The prootic, although it extends further forward than in the 
Anomodonts and Dimetrodon, has more of the greater anterior 


1034 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


projection which, oceurring in Diademodon and also in Ornitho- 
rhynchus, has a long suture with the parietal. 


Quadrate region of Gorgonopsids. 


A large Gorgonopsid skull, at a slightly more advanced stage of 
evolution than Arctops, from the Hndothiodon zone of Beaufort 
West, which was collected by the Rev. J. H. Whaits and is now 
in the British Museum, shows the quadrate and the bones 
surrounding it in a most perfect manner. 


Text-figure 6. 


The quadrate and surrounding bones of a Gorgonopsid from the 
Mndothiodon zone of Beaufort West. X 1. 
A, from in front; B, from behind. 
Par.Oc., Paroccipital process; Pt., Pterygoid; Quw., Quadrate; Qu.J., Quadrato- 
jugal ; Sqg., Squamosal; Tab., Tabulare. 


The squamosal has a powerful articulation with the end of the 
paroccipital process ; the bone there sends a process dorsally and 
medially which articulates with the tabulare, postorbital, and 


SOME CARNIVOROUS THERAPSIDS. 1035 


probably the supraoccipital and parietal. Lateral to its articu- 
lation with the paroccipital process the squamosal is very massive, 
and after passing directly outward for some distance finally 
curves round and forms part of the zygomatic arch. The front 
face of the lateral part of the squamosal is excavated for the 
quadrate and quadratojugal. 

The quadrate is a comparatively large bone with a trace of the 
pterygoid ramus in a slightly turned back area behind which the 
posterior end of the pterygoid passes. The lower margin of 
the bone is thickened to form the condyle, which, although its 
surface is destroyed, must have looked very much more forward 
than downward. 

The quadratojugal is a small bone completely fused with the 
quadrate at the lower margin and actually forming a good deal 
of the condyle. On the posterior surface it is seen to overlap the 
quadrate ; separating a good deal of its posterior surface from 
the squamosal between the two bones is a large foramen. 

In Arctognathus the quadrate is partially shown on one side, 
and relatively is considerably smaller than that of the earlier 
type described above. 

In Diademodon the quadrate as it has been described by 
Seeley, Broom, and myself, is very much smaller. It will be 
remembered that 1t is possible that there is a foramen through 
the quadrate of Diadenodon suggesting that even in that form 
there is a rudimentary and otherwise totally fused quadratojugal. 


The Palate of Lycosuchus ? 


In the British Museum there isa very large “ Therocephalian ” 
skull (R. 4100) from Vit. Kyk. Gouph, collected by T. Bain from 
the Tapinocephalus zone. 

This is perhaps not definitely determinable, as it is broken 
off through the canine, behind which it shows only one molar 
tooth. I can see no generic differences, in fact few differences, 
except that it is considerably larger, from the specimen of 
Lycosuchus vanderriti described by Dr. Broom. In any case it 
is unquestionable that it is closely allied to Scylacosaurus. The 
palate of this individual is very well but curiously preserved, 
having been cleaned by the weathering of a broken face which 
passes along the palate, having its mediai portion adherent to one 
block and the remainder to another. 

The basisphenoid is not completely shown, but has a very deep 
(2 ecm.) and narrow keel along its ventral surface. Although 
they are only incompletely exposed, iteis evident that the basi- 
pterygoid processes are the usual flat plates found in all South 
African “Carnivorous” Therapsids. It is clearly shown that the 
epipterygoid, which is a comparatively narrow but laterally 
flattened bone, articulates with the process. 

The pterygoid is the usual large triradiate bone ; it articulates 
with the basipterygoid process and sends a ramus pack to pass 


1036 MR. D. M. S. WATSON ON 


behind the quadrate. The ramus has a ridge down its outer 
margin and a flat shelf on the inner side. 


Text-figure 7. 


Restoration of the palate of Lycosuchus? X oe 
B.Sp., Basisphenoid ; P.V., Prevomer ; Pal., Palatine; Pt., Pterygoid ; 
Vo., Vomer. 


In front of the basisphenoid the pterygoid rises into a high 
ridge overlapping on to the basisphenoidal keel, which terminates 


SOME CARNIVOROUS THERAPSIDS. 1037 


suddenly, leaving the ridge on the pterygoid to form the side of a 
narrow interpterygoid vacuity ; further forward the flange of the 
pterygoid meets its fellow of the opposite side, and the two run 
on in contact till they are again separated by a small round 
interpterygoid vacuity. 

At the side of this region the process which combines with 
the transverse bone to form the powerful pterygoid flange is 
given off. 

Further forward the bone bears a ridge with two irregular 
rows of teeth, and finally undoubtedly continues forward to the 
prevomer. 

On the block from which the median part of the palate has 
been split away, there is very clearly shown a long. median bone 
forming a narrow vertical plate. That this bone is not, as it 
might conceivably have been, formed by a fused pair of ridges on 
the dorsal surface of the pterygoids, is shown by the occurrence 
of very fine but I think definite sutures, between its posterior 
end and the pterygoids, and conclusively by the fact that what is 
undoubtedly a part of the pterygoid is applied to its lateral face 
ending in front ina very obvious manner. ‘This median bone is 
clearly seen to pass between the posterior ends of the prevomers 
in front. 

There can be no doubt but that this bone is the same as the 
vomer of Diademodon, and is the median bone in the same position 
which, if Lam right, occurs in Gorgonops. 

The palatine is a large bone with a long suture with the 
maxilla; posteriorly it forms the front border of the large sub- 
orbital fossa and its inner edge has a suture with the pterygoid, 
finally it has a short contact with the prevomer. 

The two prevomers are very clearly seen in the specimen ; 
posteriorly they are separated by the vomer, but in front they 
are in contact ; the lower surface of the bar between the posterior 
nares, which is formed by them, has exactly the same form as that 
of the similar bar (which in my view is probably formed by a 
pair of fused prevomers) in Glorgonops. 

The palate just described differs from that of Scylacosaurus 
only in the presence of the very narrow vomer. 

This palate will be seen to resemble that of Lauria in very 
many features; in fact it differs from the palate of the nearly 
contemporary Gorgonopsids in exactly the same features that the 
palate of Bauria differs from that of a Cygnognathid. 

This specimen is the first that has shown a definite median 
vomer and a pair of paired prevomers in the same animal. It 
seems to me to add a very strong argument in favour of Dr. 
Broowm’s view that the mammalian vomer is not homologous with 
the “vomers ” of a Lizard. 

The various new facts brought forward in this paper show that 
the accepted division of the “ Carnivorous” Therapsids into 
Therocephalia, Gorgonopsia, and Cynodontia, is far from satis- 
factory. In my opinion the differences between Lauria and its 


1038 ON SOME CARNIVOROUS THERAPSIDS, 


allies and the Cynognathide are important—are, in fact, to a 
great degree actually the same as those separating the “ Thero- 
cephalia ” and “ Gorgonopsia.” I do not regard these differences 
as being of ordinal value, and as a purely temporary measure 
propose to revive Owen’s term of Theriodontia as an Order, 
including in it as suborders the Therocephalia, with Scylagosaurus 
and Lycosaurus as well-known types; the Gorgonopsia, with 
Gorgonops, Arctops, Scymnognathus, Arctognathus ; the Bauride, 
with Bauria, Microgomphodon, and Sesamodon; and the Cyno- 
dontia, to include the Nythosauride: and Cynognathide. 


ON A NEW MAMMALIAN GESTODE. 1039 


| From the Procnupines or rue Zoontoaican Socinry or Lonvon, 
1914. ] 
{Published December 1914. 


Contributions to the Anatomy and Systematic Arrange- 
yy y gs 
ment of the Cestoidea. By Frank EH. Bepparp, M.A., 
D.Sce., F.R.S., F.Z.8., Prosector to the Society. 


(Text-figures 1-9.) 


XV. On A NEW GENUS AND SPECIES OF THE 
Famity AcoLEIDa. 


INDEX. Page 
Moneecocestus erethizontis, gen. et sp. 0. ........0.--00000--.2--. 1055 


T obtained a large number of examples of this new Tapeworm 
from a specimen of the Canadian ree-Porcupine, Hrethizon 
dorsatum, which died in the Society’s Gardens on May 14. From 
the comparatively short time which the host had lived in the 
Gardens (one year and two months) it would seem to be very 
possible that it was infected with the parasite before arriving in 
London, and that this Cestode is therefore an American and not 
a Kuropean genus or species. On the other hand, there are no 
facts which would render the opposite view untenable. But little 
is known of the longevity of these worms in their final hosts. 
To the naked eye, or after an inspection with a hand-lens, 
there is nothing remarkable in the worm, which, however, 
shows on a more profound anatomical examination to present 
several features of interest, of which the most important is the 
great reduction of the female efferent organs. This feature 
would seem to place it inthe family Acoleidz ; but the systematic 
position will be considered after the structure has been gone 
into. 

This species is medium sized, the examples reaching a length 
of 50 to 60 mm., or perhaps a trifle more; the greatest breadth 
is not more than just over 3 mm. When alive, the scolex end 
of the worm swayed about with considerable vivacity, which 
I have not observed to be generally the case among tapeworms, 
the movements being, as a rule, slower. 

The segments are flat and thin, and at the end of the body get 
to be rather translucent. This lack of the usual white appearance 
is not, however, due to sterility ; the very last segment in such 
examples as I examined, by means of sections, was gravid. The 
scolex is very distinct, though the body widens immediately , 
after it. There are no hooks of any kind upon either the 
rostellum or the suckers. There is, im fact, no rostellum; the 
suckers are fairly large and conspicuous. Under examination 
with a lens, the neck appeared to be quite absent and the seg- 
mentation to commence at once. There is, however, as may be 
seen 1n longitudinal sections, a very short neck where no segments 


1040 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


are to be observed. In the strobila region the segments ‘are 
at first very narrow; but they increase in length posteriorly, 
though never reaching a greater length than diameter. The 
hinder margins on either side project in the more mature 
segments over the following segment. The last segment of the 
body was often to be seen; it was narrower and a trifle longer 
than those immediately preceding it and somewhat oval in form. 
As already remarked, this segment did not prove to be sterile. 


Text-figure 1. 


LeSs 


Moncecocestus erethizontis. 


A. General view of scolex and anterior proglottids. 
B. A few anterior proglottids, illustrating relative positions of receptaculum 
seminis and cirrus-sac. 
p. Genital pore. 7.s. Receptaculum seminis. 


The genital pores alternate with rigid regularity from side to side 
of the body. The cirrus was frequently seen to be protruded, 
and very often an oval body bearing the cirrus also projected ~ 
trom the side; on making sections this body proved not to be the 
protruded cirrus-sac as might have been anticipated, but that 
sac surrounded by a certain part of the medullary tissue which 
together formed a marked bulge upon the side of the segment. 


A NEW MAMMALIAN CESTODE. 1041 


These are the only external characters to be noticed in this 
worm, whose identity or systematic position, as is obvious, could 
not be thereby determined. The flatness and thinness of the 
strobila is emphasised by transverse sections. In such, the fact 
may be observed that the cortex is of less diameter than the 
medulla. As is usual, the two layers of parenchyma are separated 
by a layer of transverse muscles, which is, in the present species, 


Text-figure 2. 


Monecocestus erethizontis. 
Part of a transverse section through a ripe proglottid. 


ci. Cirrus-sac. ov. Ovary. 7.s. Receptaculum seminis. w¢. Uterus. 
w.v. Water-vascular vessels. 


a thin one. So, too, are the longitudinal muscles, which are no- 
-where massed into bundles. They lie singly, but in several rows ; 
nor is their arrangement regular. Thus the muscular system is 
altogether slight, and contrasts in this with various members of 
the family Acoleide. The muscular fibres themselves are slender, 


Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. LXX. 70 


1042 > DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


and it is not a little unusual to find that: the abundant dorso- 
ventral fibres are of stouter build, and thus much more 
conspicuous in a transverse section. Calcareous bodies are 
numerous in this species, and are to be found throughout the 
body both in the cortex and the medulla. 

The water-vascular system consists of the usual four longi- 
tudinal trunks, of which the ventral are connected by the usual 
transverse vessels in each segment. Both in transverse and 
horizontal sections it can be observed that the two trunks of each 
side of the body are placed as nearly as possible side by side. 
The outermost of the two vessels, however, is slightly to one side, 
that is to say, it is, being the dorsal vessel, slightly dorsal in 
position of the ventral tube. It is well known that the relative 
positions of the dorsal and ventral tubes when lying side by side 
differ, being in some species arranged precisely in the reverse 
fashion to others. In the present worm the dorsal vessel lies to 
the outside, as I presume from the fact that the outer vessel is 
not the one which is connected with its fellow by the transverse 
vessel in each segment, and from the fact that it is from time to 
time much narrower in calibre than the inner ventral vessel. 
Often, however, the two vessels are of the same size. The trans- 
verse tubes lie in the middle of the medulla, and at the end of 
the segment. The inner longitudinal vessel bends inwards to 
give off the transverse vessel, which thus forms a Y-like angle. 
I could discover no trace of any network connected with any of 
the main trunks. Such a network exists in the family Acoleidee, 
and is referred to by Fuhrmann * in Shipleya inermis. 


nd 


Genital Organs. 


A peculiarity of this species—which, however, it shares with 
a good many Cestodes—is the early development of the genital 
organs. It agrees, for instance, with Schizotenia americana (to 
accept v. Janicki’s identification of Stiles’s species tT) in this 
feature, a point which must be borne in mind in comparing the 
two. I recognised in longitudinal horizontal sections consider- 
able traces of the genitalia in the fourth segment, and I would 
not like to assert the absence of still more undifferentiated 
beginnings in an earlier segment. In the sixth segment the 
cirrus-sac was fairly developed and the sperm-duct obvious ; and 
in the sixth segment I saw for the first time a perfectly clear 
circular external pore. This was seen in a specimen mounted 
entire in glycerine, and it agrees with another specimen which 
I examined by sections. There were pores in all the segments 
posterior to the sixth. I have already mentioned the absolute 
regularity of the alternation of the genital pores from right to 
left side. The earliest segment in which the genitalia appeared 
to be quite functional was the ninth, in which J observed the 


* Rey. Suisse Zool. xvi. 1908, p. 70. 
+ Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. xix. 1897, p. 165. 


A NEW MAMMALIAN CESTODE. 1043 


receptaculum to be full of sperm. Neither the testes nor the ova 
were ripe so early in the body. 

The testes lie posteriorly in the segment just in front of the 
transverse water-vascular vessel. They form a narrow band 
running right across each segment, but contained within the 
area bounded by the lateral water-vascular trunks. 

It may be seen in transverse and horizontal sections that the 
testes are not more than two deep and are in three or four 
rows. There are about 60-70 in each segment. I regard the 
testes as dorsal in position, because when the outer and dorsal 
water-vascular trunk moves away from its lateral position with 
reference to the inner tube, it les to the side corresponding to 
that on which lie the testes. They are therefore dorsal, and the 
ovary 1S ventral in position. 

Furthermore, since the cirrus-sac passes to the same side of the 
two water-vascular tubes as that on which the testes lie, it has a 
dorsal position with regard to them ; this point is not mentioned 
by Fuhrmann in his account of Shipleya. Moreover, as the trans- 
verse vessels arise from the ventral vessels they, too, are ventral 
in position, and therefore the female organs such as the recep- 
taculum, which is more or less level with them, must be ventral. 
Fuhrmann states that in Shipleya the ovary is ventral. JI have 
not been able to notice any ripe masses of spermatozoa in the 
testes, though there are many in the cirrus. This absence of 
sperm from the testes has already been noted by Fuhrmann in 
another genus. 

The vas deferens of this worm is very remarkable. In the 
very young proglottids the vas deferens emerges from the cirrus- 
sac asa short and curved tube which is curved backwards towards 
the testes. In rather older proglottids the vas deferens is not 
much longer but is distinctly differentiated into two regions; 
there is a ‘wider tube which emer ges from the cirrus-sac and this 
abruptly becomes narrower in the distal region, where it ulti- 
mately breaks up into three or four branches for the supply of 
the testes. This differentiation of the vas deferens is much more 
highly developed in mature proglottids. The vas deferens after it 
emerges from the cirrus-sac runs forwards and inwards obliquely 
towards the anterior end of the segment, and that is away from 
the testes, which are posterior in position ; this region of the vas 
deferens is that of the greater calibre, and the fine tube which 
issues from it is the sperm-duct proper and runs backwards 
towards the testes and thus at an acute angle with the anterior 
region. This is foreshadowed in the curved course of the entire 
vas deferens shown in the immature proglottids. To return to 
the anterior section of the vas deferens—this tube is very wide, 
relatively speaking, and often dilates at the ends, where it passes 
into the narrow section of the vas deferens, into a circular sac ; 
its width varies in parts and according to the state of develop- 
ment of the segment. 

The intimate structure of this region of the vas deferens is a 


(OTs 


1044 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


little difficult to make out. But it is clear that it forms a tube, 
slightly sinuous, which is walled by a layer of cells in which 
appear to lie masses of secretion, which masses are colloid in 
appearance and deeply stained by hematoxylin. They are found 
also within the tube, especially in its more dilated regions. 
These masses of secretion, as I suppose them to be, are shown 


Text-figure 3. 


Monccocestus erethizontis. 


A. Cirrus-sac in longitudinal section. 
a. Its cellular sheath. ce. Slightly produced cirrus. 


B. Proximal end of vas deferens. 


ci. Cirrus-sac. 7. Longitudinal muscular fibres. v.s. Dilatation of 
vas deferens. 


in text-fig. 3. The tubular character of this dilated region of 
the vas deferens is very obvious in the younger proglottids, where 
the cells of the tube have not become modified by the secretion 
spoken of. In parts, for instance, in the terminal dilatation 


A NEW MAMMALIAN CESLODE. 1045 


represented in text-fig. 3, the walls of the tube are thin but 
apparently still cellular. From this dilated extremity springs 
the fine and narrow distal region of the vas deferens, in which 
the actual walls are to be recognised with difficulty. These 
appearances suggest that we have to do here with an extremely 
exaggerated form of a vesicula seminalis, which possibly serves 
other purposes beside the mere storage of sperm; but as to what 
these functions are I have no reasons to form an opinion. It 
is, however, perhaps to be associated with the development of 
the sperm, which does not appear to come to maturity within 
the testes, as I have already pointed out. In all proglottids the 
dilated and glandular region of the vas deferens appeared to be 
full of sperm. 

The cirrws-sae of this worm is large and reaches inwards 
across the two longitudinal tubes of the water-vascular system. 
It is perhaps half a millimetre in length. As already mentioned, 
the cirrus sacs alternate in position with absolute regularity in 
successive proglottids. Each cirrus-sac opens on to the exterior 
in mature segments rather behind the middle of the proglottid, 
and its position is oblique—the posterior end being directed 
anteriorly; the external aperture is thus directed vather back- 
wards. I observed no individuals im copula, and it is dificult to 
understand how this takes place. In the case of other Acoleide, 
which are all, like the present genus, without female orifices in 
the mature seoments, it has been suggested that the spiny cirri 
perforate the body. Of any such spines there seems to be no 
trace in the present species. But frequently the cirrus within 
the sae was dilated with masses of sperm, conspicuous on account 
of its deeply staining with hematoxylin. The cirrus-sac projects 
into a fairly deep genital cloaca which is, in the most anterior 
segments where the cirrus-sac is immature, quite as deep as the 
cirrus-sac is long. The distinctiveness of the genital cloaca is 
rather lost in the mature proglottids. The cirrus-sac itself is 
oval in form, with a gradually decreasing anterior region which 
projects into the genital cloaca. It is, in fact, pear- shaped with 
rather a long stalk. 

When the cirrus-sac is quite fully formed, it is seen to le in 
a rather specialised region of the body parenchyma. This region 
is formed of very lax tissue, which might thus be supposed to 
allow of greater freedom on the part of the cirrus-sac. More- 
over, isolated but numerous muscular fibres run inside and outside 
of this lax area which are attached to the cirrus-sac and probably 
serve as retractors. This lax area is not limited to the region 
occupied by the cirrus-sac alone; it runs back and accompanies 
the first part of the sperm-duct. In a series of sections the 
cirrus-sac and the first part of the sperm-duct are seen to he 
loosely in the lax tissue which extends beyond it in every 
direction. The cirrus-sac is extremely muscular, the walls being 
unusually thick. The muscle-layers are two, the cutside being 
of fibres having a longitudinal direction, and within this is a 


1046 - DR. F. E, BEDDARD ON 


much thicker layer of circular fibres.. The inner layer is twice, 
or in parts thrice, the thickness of the outer layer. The imner 
circular layer ceases with the diminution in diameter of the 
cirrus-sac on its way to the exterior; the inner oval region is 
alone thus fortified. The outer muscular layer, however, con- 
tinues to the distal extremity of the cirrus-sac and its narrower 
projection. Outside of these muscle-layers the cirrus-sac is 
enclosed within a single layer of rather large vesicular cells with 
a prominent nucleus. It appeared to me that this layer was 
continuous with the epithelium of the ensuing vas deferens, 
though special to the cirrus-sae in its peculiar structure. The 
cirrus-sac, as usual among the Cestodes, contains delicate muscular 
fibres and nuclei within it in addition to the cirrus. In the 
younger stages in the development of the cirrus-sac the sac has 


Text-figure 4. 


Moneecocestus erethizontis. 


A proglottid viewed in its entirety, to show the position and shape of the 
ovary (ov.) and yitelline gland (v.g.). 


ci. Cirrus-sac. w.v. Water-vascular tpbe. 


more delicate walls in the rounded part of it, while the region 
leading to the genital cloaca has thicker muscular walls; the 
precise reverse occurs in the adult sac. The cirrus itself lies in 
a perfectly straight line in the adult cirrus-sac, and is of even 
calibre throughout when not distended with sperm; there is 
nothing in the nature of a vesicula seminalis within the cirrus- 
sac such as has been described in many forms. But when 
charged with sperm, dilatations are formed locally which are 
therefore to be regarded merely as local turgescences due to the 
enclosed sperm, and not, as representing a definite dilatation 
on the course of the duct, such as is the receptaculum upon 
the course of the vagina in this and other tapeworms. In 


A NEW MAMMALIAN CESTODE. 1047 


the younger and more spherical cirrus-sacs of earlier segments 
the cirrus is coiled. It perforates the muscle-layers of the 
cirrus-sac to become continuous with the vas deferens without 
any change of diameter. 

The ovary of this worm is ventral in position, as in Shipleya 
inermis. In horizontal sections it forms with the vitelline gland 
almost a complete ring, since the ovary is semicircular and the 
smaller vitelline gland serves to close the semicircle posteriorly. 
The ovary is larger than the vitelline gland, and lies, of course, 
more anteriorly in the segment. In transverse sections the ovary 
is Seen to possess a longitudinal and tubular form, the greater 
part of the cavity being empty. This is illustrated in text-fig. 2 
(p. 1041). It is there seen to be pressed closely against the 
transverse muscular layer bounding the medulla, and thus to lie 
below the receptaculum seminis and also, to some extent, the 
vitelline gland. The remarkable tubular form of the ovary in 
young proglottids might lead to its being confused with the 
commencing uterus, which, however, lies above it and on a level 
with the receptaculum ovorum. The ovary has thus a flattened 
form when viewed in its entirety. It is near to the middle of the 
proglottid verging towards the pore side. The young cells, which 
will become ova, are chiefly massed at the two ends right and left 
of the tubular ovary, and this region, as shown in the figure 
referred to, is somewhat dilated on both sides, forming an oval 
sac. The course of the tube when viewed in transverse sections 
is quite straight from side to side. 


§ Vagina. 


A careful inspection of the horizontal sections shows that, 
although no vagina opens into the so far isolated receptaculum 
seminis, the equivalent of a vagina would appear to be present. 
I cannot otherwise interpret a narrow straight duct which opens 
on to the exterior beside, and in front of, the cirrus-sac. This 
duct passes towards the interior of the body, up to a point ona 
level with the end of the outer half of the cirrus-sac; it is 
therefore of very. limited extent. It ends at this spot in a 
dilatation, an oval sac. I have seen this tube ending blindly in 
a sac in four or five segments. There is thus no question of its 
normal presence; but I have seen it in the more anterior seg- 
ments only, but which are nevertheless well provided with gonads, 
and a cirrus-sac as large as it is in the more posteriorly situated 
segments. The slender character of the duct and the delicate 
chamber into which it expands, remind me greatly of the conditions 
obtaining in my genus Diplopylidium *. But in the latter worm 


* P.Z.S. 1913, p. 562. The illustration depicting the vagina of Diplopylidium 
(text-fig. 92, p. 563) may be compared with my description of the present species. 
In the text of that paper I have remarked that only in Tetrabothrius is this reversed 
position of pores. ‘This is an obvious lapsus calami for Tetradiscotyla. 


1048 DR. F, E. BEDDARD ON 


the small receptaculum passes posteriorly into a duct leading to 
the internal portion of the female apparatus. It seems to me 
to be impossible not to recognise in this tube a rudimentary 
vagina; but the dilatation can hardly be compared to a recep- 
taculum, since that exists elsewhere. 

In the first few proglottids of the worm, the female efferent 
apparatus is still more highly developed than in those proglottids 
which have just been considered. I find, in fact, in the first six 
or so of those proglottids in which the reproductive apparatus 
generally is recognisable in its details, that the vagina (text-fig. 5) 


Text-figure 5., 


Moncecocestus ercthizontis. 


Part of a horizontal section through an anterior proglottid where the 
vagina (v.) has not commenced to disappear. 


g-c. Genital cloaca. 


is a wide thick-walled tube which opens on to the exterior close 
to, and in front of, the cirrus-sac on the cne hand, and communi- 
cates with the receptaculum seminis on the other, thus forming a 
continuous female efferent apparatus, like that of more normal 
Cestodes. It is, perhaps, during this transient state that fertili- 
zation is effected, also in the normal way vid this tube and not 
through the interstices of the body parenchyma. I have noted 
certain stages in the degeneration of the vagina; that part of it 
which opens into the receptaculum seminis persists, after it has 


A NEW MAMMALIAN CESTODE. 1049 


ceased to be a pervious duct, as a narrow tract of tissue blocked 
entirely by medullary parenchyma, but still retaining a definite 
wall (text-fig. 6) separating it from the surrounding parenchyma. 
As already mentioned, the external part of the duct persists longer 
as a pervious tube ending blindly and in a dilatation. This worm, 
therefore, is interesting as showing a transition between such a 
family as the Anoplocephalidz and the Acoleide in point of its 
female efferent apparatus. 


Text-figure 6. 


a 
iatiean 


nee oo 
: 


Ny a ae 
Pee 


“> 
ca 


Monecocestus erethizontis. 


Part of a horizontal section through a proglottid a little further back than that 
referred to in text-fig. 5, to show degeneration of vagina (v.). 


r.s. Receptaculum seminis. ¢. Testes. 


The uterus of this worm is reticulate, except in very old 
proglottids in which a more complete fusion of the network tends 
to produce a saccular uterus, There are, however, even here, 
traces of the reticular condition. These may ultimately perhaps 
disappear. The uterus appears early in the body, and I have 
depicted it in young proglottids in text-figs. 7 & 8, which are re- 
spectively horizontal and transverse sections through young 
segments. A corresponding section (text-fig. 9) represents the 
mature uterus in subsequent segments. ‘This organ is seen to 
lie quite medianly in the proglottid, that is to say, it is well 
above the ovary and in the same straight line with the receptac- 
ulum seminis. The ovary has disappeared in the more mature 
proglottids. The uterus at first forms a network of rather 
delicate strands which are abundantly nucleated but contain no 
lumen, or only a very narrow one. In transverse sections the 
lumen is quite visible in young proglottids, which are, however, 


1050 . DR. F..E, BEDDARD ON. 


rather older than that depicted in text-fig. 8. The cavities appear 
in such a section to be detached, as the network is not so close as 
it becomes later. The cavities are lined with an epithelium which 
is at least less obvious in older uteri. 


Text-figure 7. 


Moncecocestus erethizontis. 


Horizontal section illustrating the first appearance of the uterus (wt.). 


7.s. Receptaculum seminis. w.v. Water-vascular tube. 


In all the sections referred to it may be seen that the uterus 
does not extend laterally beyond the trunks of the water-vascular 
system. The uterus is quite persistent, and is not replaced by 
anything of the nature of paruterine organs. The ripe eggs 
have a delicate shell, as appears to be the case in the Acoleide 
generally. L ee at 

Naturally I have endeavoured to ascertain how far my species 


A NEW MAMMALIAN CESTODE, 1051 


resembles Bertia (now written Bertiella) americana, a species de- 
scribed by Stiles * from the same genus Hrethizon, and previously 
assigned by the American helminthologist to the genus Andrya. 
This species, which is possibly, according to Stiles, identical 
with Tenia laticephala of Leidy*t, is regarded by v. Janickit 
to be identical with his Schizotenia. 


Text-figure 8. 


Monceecocestus erethizontis. 


Transverse section showing the retiform uterus (wt.). 


ci. Cirrus-sac. w.v. Water-vascular tube. 


At first sight of the figures given by Stiles in explanation of 
this species, I was disposed to think that it might be identical 
with that which I describe in the present paper. For example, 
the male pores alternate with absolute regularity from right to 
left in segment to segment, and the very early development of 


* Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. xix. 1897, p. 165. 
+ Proc. Ac. Sci. Philad. 1855, p. 443. 
t Zool. Anz. xxvii. 1904, p. 782. 


1052 _ DR. F. E, BEDDARD ON 


the sexual organs is as in my species. The drawing * showing this 
alternation does not clearly represent the female ducts; but they 
are shown in a figure of a transverse section T. | infer them to 
be present in “ Bertia americana,” though no particular and de- 
tailed mention of them is made in the text. The shape of the 
uterus, however, and the extreme narrowness of the segments, 
are sufficient to prevent any confusion between the two species. 
Tenia pectinata, described by Cobbold = from the same animal, is 


Text-figure 9. 


Monecocestus erethizontis. 


Horizontal section showing the retiform uterus (wt.). 
r.s. Receptaculum seminis. w.v. Water-vascular vessel. 


too imperfectly known to permit of a comparison ; moreover, it 
has unilateral genital pores, which are fatal to such a comparison. 
The question may arise—are not my specimens perhaps 
abnormal ?@ Von Janicki§$ has lately directed attention to two 
species of Hymenolepis in which the genital pores are absent ; 
and at the same time Wolffhiigel || has made similar observations 
upon a species of Bertiella. These facts are applied by v. Janicki 


* Stiles, loc. cit. pl. x. fig. 7. + Stiles, Joc. cit. pl. x. fig. 9. 
- t Can. Nat. & Geol. vii. 1862, p. 394. ; hey 
§ CB. Bakt. u. Paras. xxxvi. 1904, p. 222. 
|| Berliner tierairztl. Wochenschr. 1904 (quoted by v. Janicki and Fuhrmann). 


A NEW MAMMALIAN CESTODE. 1053 


to Fuhrmann’s genus Aporina, among the characters of which 
genus is the lack of these pores. Fuhrmann, however, has 
pointed out * that even if in the future examples of Aporina alba 
be met with in which the sexual ducts reach the exterior, the genus 
Aporina will not be invalidated thereby. I may use the same 
argument with regard to the species of Cestode which I describe 
in the present paper. But if I were compelled to ignore the 
rudimentary vagina, the genus would have to be placed in the 
subtamily ‘Anoplocephaling of the family <Anoplocephalide, 
though it would remain distinct. 


Comparison with Shipleya inermis Fuhrmann. 


Although at first sight, and indeed after some study, I was 
disposed to place the present species in the same genus as 
Shipleya, and even to consider the possibility of the iwe forms 
being identical, Iam no longer able, after a more profound study of 
this species, to identify even generically the two forms referred to. 
It is remarkable, however, that in pursuing my supposed new 
species through the dichotomous table of Mr. Ransom I arrived 
at the genus Shipleya, the only difference apparently being the 
Jack of spines upon the cirrus in my species. A reference to 
Fuhrmann’s original description of Shipleya inermis shows, bow- 
ever, that there are other differences, and of importance. Shipleya, 
like other Acoleide, has a body-wall which is traversed by a 
complicated series of muscles. Outside of the inner transverse 
muscles is a double row of large bundles; outside of this again 
are four separate and very thin layers of transverse fibres, 
between each of which is a layer of longitudinal fibres. Such a 
section is figured by Fuhrmann. In my species, on the other 
hand, there is but a single and the usual layer of transverse 
fibres, outside of which is a layer of singly disposed longitudinal 
fibres, an arrangement in marked contrast to that of Shiples ya. 

In the second place, although my species from Hrethizon has 
a large cirrus-sac, this organ is not so large as in Shipleya, 
where it measures no less than one millimetre in length and 
is, furthermore, covered by diagonal fibres. In my species 
the fibres have the arrangement described above on p. 1045. 
There is, however, in both species the accurate alternation in 
the position of the genital apertures. But we shall see directly 
that another tapeworm, more probably allied to my species, 
shows the same regular alternation of these pores from right to 
left side of the body. I do not think it likely that I have failed 
to see the spines upon the cirrus if they were really present and 
like those of Shipleya; for Fuhrmann described these spines as 
arranged in three rows and very like the thorny spines of the 
Acanthocephala. I have seen nothing of the kind, though the 
cuticle covering the organ is composed of almost separate rod- 
like spinules. These, however, are closely set and in contact, 


* Zool. Jahrb., Suppl.-Bd. x. 1908, p. 39. 


1054 DR. F. E. BEDDARD ON 


and cannot be compared with spines such as I infer to exist in 
Shipleya. The last-mentioned genus does not appear to possess 
testes in the same segments as those which contain the ripe 
female sexual products; Fuhrmann did not see those gonads 
but presumed that they were to be found in earlier segments. 
Now in my species the testes are obvious and numerous in 
very many segments. Prof. Fuhrmann, with his experience 
of the structure of Cestodes, could not have missed them were 
they so plentifully present in Shipleya mermis. This is a 
most important difference between the two forms, and one 
which marks out the genus Shipleya as having retained to 
some extent the dicecious nature of its ally Diwococestus. There 
is no trace of such a state of affairs in my species. It is doubt- 
less of minor importance to point out that the receptaculum in 
Shipleya has a crenate outline and isa small sac, while in my 
species it is rather large and of circular contour. Also the 
vitelline gland of my species is displayed in the same horizontal 
section with the ovary, and therefore does not lie entirely dorsal 
to it, as is stated to be the case in Shipleya. Finally, it is rather 
remarkable that there should be so close a likeness between the 
uterus in the two forms. It has in both a nearly annular shape, 
being incomplete however on one side. The uterus persists in 
both species, and is not replaced by anything in the nature of a 
paruterine organ. This fact, coupled with the character of the 
female generative system, leads me to place my species in the 
neighbourhood of this genus Shipleya, but other details of 
anatomy forbid their reference to the same genus. 

The species described in this paper therefore differs from 
Shipleya in the following assemblage of characters :— 


(1) Lhe muscular layers of the body-wall are feeble. 

(2) There are no papille on the scolex and no apical depression. 

(3) The water-vascular tubes have no ramifications. 

(4) The testes are nuinerous in all segments until those in which 
the uterus is developed, and form rows right across the 
proglottids. 

(5) Although the vagina comes to be aborted it is fully developed 
in the most anterior segments, and there are traces of the 
terminal part for some way back in the shape of a sac 
opening on to the exterior in front of the cirrus. 

(6) The cirrus has no spines wpon it. 

(7) The uterus forms a network. 

(8) The vas deferens is dilated into a vesicula seminalis of 
peculiar form. 


As the definitions of genera among the Cestoidea go, these 
characters are, as it appears to me, quite sufficient to allow of 
generic separation. They are also accompanied by a few minor 
differences, such as the form of the receptaculum seminis, and 
also by some minor points of likeness, such as size and absence of 
neck and regular alternation in genital pores. 


A NEW MAMMALIAN CESTODE. 1055 


The following characters will define the new genus, and the 
name will suggest its affinity with the Acoleide :— 


MONGCOCESTUS, gen. nov. 


Scolex unarmed; proglottids not longer than broad. Genital 
pores regularly alternating. Water-vascular tubes two pairs lying 
side by side, connected by transverse vessel from inner tubes in each 
proglottid; no network. Longitudinal muscles feebly developed, 
without bundles. Generative organs visible in first or second pro- 
glottid ; first genital pore in segment 6. Testes numerous im 
transverse rows posteriorly, within area bownded by water-vessels ; 
sperm-duct at first very wide and covered by glandular cells, after 
this short and narrow, without coil or vesicula seminalis; cirrus- 
sac large and very muscular, cirrus unarmed. Ovary curved in 
front of smaller vitelline gland. Vagina present in a few early 
segments, later aborted, with exception of spherical receptaculum 
seminis. Uterus retiform, meshwork later tending to confluence. 
Eggs with delicate shell. 


For the present the above definition will have also to serve 
for the new species, which I call MWonecocestus erethizontis, sp. n. 


if ise Pipa ea off FaGeat in conti 
wed nh Hy hh ath Ae PE 


j $a dg. uy deste 
heat | Yaseen § aay asf PAM OME a 


VJ me: on I it 
pyr, ee ae any a " TS, ont ie A 1 
’ at sik Matas partir Hei 
< ¥ ty He: ae ga, 
» ; his Laas 
i ) a % a a - 
J ‘ 


¥ a . 7, Gh ig ne wit A, Ti “a er Me \e * 

Py a Lal Week. rane " Meat abide} ne e 

Panik i ily ee opin, Ue Seine Wileae aN ae 
A hl a 4 ee a ek ts ‘ah " sf* M4) eit aia 

verde . ( : . vG! pi\ Dvd ‘acaeee , Unie eis 

‘ a ty ; ; ’ rth spac An ashy Ae “f Bi Nath 

SATs. cage 

me FU je AP ay Ye ee? oR. sb: 
| ESE git 

c i rf gh we) 

en dh SRR A yRolines ies ih dies Aiinaiveds nti 

Sree) Al sj ol Wiles Fy lipeininge ee ead, ni 


r* ¢ 
"fed 2 rake ‘ 
i 
F 
: . 
ji 
o 
*) 


THE SECRETARY ON ADDITIONS TO THE MENAGERIE, 1057 


EXHIBITIONS AND NOTICES. 
October 27, 1914. 
Prof, EK. A, Mincuin, M.A., F.R.S., Vice-President, 


in the Chair. 


The Srcrerary read the following report on the Additions 
made to the Society’s Menagerie during the months of June, 
July, August, and September, 1914 :— 


JUNE. 


The registered additions to the Society’s Menagerie during the 
month of June were 177 in number. Of these 84 were acquired 
by presentation, 42 by purchase, 15 were received on deposit, 
1 in exchange, and 35 were born in the Gardens. 

The number of departures during the same period, by death 
and removals, was 177. 


Amongst the additions special attention may be directed to :-— 


1 Anoa (Anoa depressicornis) 3, from Celebes, presented by 
Willoughby Smith on June 4th. 

1 Blesbok (Damaliscus albifrons), born in the Menagerie on 
June 18th. 

3 Gemsbok (Orywv gazella) § 3 2, from the Kalahari, new to the 
Collection, purchased on June 2nd and 3rd. 

1 Panolia Deer (Cervus eldi) 3, from Rangoon, presented by 
H. L. Holman Hunt, F.Z.S., on June 13th. 

1 Vicuha (Lama vicugna) 2, from Peru, presented by G. Noel 
Clarke, F.Z.S., on June 12th. 

1 Peruvian Tree-Poreupine (Coendw bicolor), from Peru, new 
to the Collection, deposited on June 3rd. 

2 Firecaps (Cephalopyrus flammiceps) and 1 Velvet-fronted 
Nuthatch (Sitta frontalis), from India, both new to the Collection, 
presented by Alfred Hzra, F.Z.S., on June 12th and 14th. 

2 Maximilian’s Parrots (Pionus mawximiliana), from Brazil, 
presented by the Marquess of Tavistock, F.Z.8., on June 18th. 

2 Cotton Teal (Vettopus coromandelianus), from India, pre- 
sented by Hubert D. Astley, F.Z.S., on June 29th. 

1 Rufous-crowned Ground-Cuckoo (Cowa ruficeps), from®Mada- 
gascar, new to the Collection, purchased on June 9th, 

1 Arizona Snake (Coluber arizonce), from N. America, new to 
the Collection, purchased on June 29th. 


JULY, 


The registered additions to the Society's Menagerie during the 
month of July were 277 in number. Of these 93 were acquired 
by presentation, 81 by purchase, 60 were received on deposit, 
9 in exchange, and 34 were born in the Gardens. 

Proc. Zoou. Soc.—1914, No. LX XI. fal 


1058 THE SECRETARY ON ADDITIONS TO THE MENAGERIE. 


‘The number of departures during the same period, by death 
and removals, was 239. 


Amongst the additions special attention may be directed to :— 

1 Lesser Kudu (Strepsiceros imberbis) $, from Berbera, 
presented by Arnold Hodson on July 28th. 

1 Cape Ant-bear (Orycteropus capensis), from §$. Africa, 
purchased on July Ist. 

2 Canadian Beavers (Castor canadensis), born in the Menagerie 
on July Ist. 

1 Sanday Island Vole (Microtus sandayensis), from Sanday 
Island, N. Orkneys, new to the Collection, presented by W. R. 
Ogilvie-Grant, F.Z.8., on July 11th. 

1 Black-necked Stork (Xenorhynchus asiaticus), from India, 
purchased on July 28th. 

1 Great Courlan (Aramus giganteus), from Cuba, new to the 
Collection, purchased on July 4th. 

1 Swainson’s Hawk (Gampsonyx swainsoni), from 8. America, 
new to the Collection, purchased on July 27th. 

1 Australian Ground-Thrush (Oreocinela lunulata). from New 
South Wales, new to the Collection, purchased on July Ist. 

1 Blue-headed Rock-Thrush (Petrophila cinclorhyncha), from 
the Himalayas, new to the Collection, presented by Alfred Ezra, 
F.Z.S., on July 27th. 

1 Flame-breasted Robin (Petraca phanicea), from New 
South Wales, new to the Collection, presented by Alfred Ezra, 
F.Z.S., on July Ist. 

1 White-fronted Chat (Zphthianura albifrons), from New 
South Wales, new to the Collection, purchased on July Ist. 

2 Scarlet-breasted Robins (Petraca leggi), from New South 
Wales, new to the Collection, deposited on July 17th. 

2 White-shouldered Caterpillar-eaters (Lalage tricolor), from 
New South Wales, new to the Collection, presented by Alfred Ezra, 
F.Z.8S., on July Ist. 

5 Malachite Sun-birds, 2 g and 3 Q (Nectarinia famosa), from 
South Africa, new to the Collection, deposited on July 8th. 

4 Lesser Double-collared Sun-birds (Cinnyris chalybeus), 2 3, 
2 9, from South Africa, new to the Collection, deposited on 
July 8th. 

_ 1 Friar-bird (Zropidorhynchus corniculatus), from New South 
Wales, new to the Collection, purchased on July Ist. 

2 Banana-Quits (Certhiola flaveola), fvom the West Indies, new 
to the Collection, deposited on July 8th. 

1 Collared Lizard (Crotaphytus collaris), from Western United 
States, new to the Collection, purchased on July 4th. 

1 Giant Monitor (Varanus giganteus), from Australia, new to 
the Collection, deposited on July Ist. 

2 Striolated Skinks (Lyernia striolata), from Australia, new to 
the Collection, purchased on July 4th. 


THE SECRETARY ON ADDITIONS TO THE MENAGERIE. 1059 


AUGUST. 


The registered additions to the Society’s Menagerie during the 
month of August were 200 in number. Of these 120 were 
acquired by presentation, 32 were received on deposit, 17 in 
exchange, and 31 were born in the Gardens. 

The number of departures during the same period, by death 
and removals, was 224. 


Amongst the additions special attention may be directed to :— 

1 Kordofan Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis) 3, born in the 
Menagerie on August 12th. 

4 New Zealand Geckos (Hoplodactylus pacificus), 3 Moco Skinks 
(Lygosoma moco), from New Zealand, and 1 Slender Skink (Lygo- 
soma tenwe), from Australia, all new to the Collection, deposited 
on August 6th. 

1 Smoky Snake (Tropidonotus fuliginoides) and 1 Burrowing 
Viper (Atractaspis irregularis), from Sierra Leone, both new to 
the Collection, presented by Guy Aylmer, F.Z.S., on August 6th. 

SEPTEMBER. ° 

The registered additions to the Society’s Menagerie during the 
month of September were 130 in number. Of these 56 were 
acquired by presentation, 51 by purchase, 11 were received on 
deposit, 6 in exchange, and 6 were born in the Gardens. 

The number of departures during the same period, by death 
and removals, was 161. 


Amongst the additions special attention may be directed to :— 


1 White-bearded Gnu (Connochetes albojubatus), born in the 
Menagerie on September 28th. 

2 Grey-tailed Fruit-Pigeons (Osmotreron griseicauda), from 
Java, new to the Collection, presented by the Marquess of 
Tavistock, F.Z.8., on September 18th. 

A Collection of Birds from New Guinea, the Aru Islands, ete., 
acquired by purchase on September 11th, and containing Greater 
Birds-of-Paradise (Paradisea apoda), a Lesser Bird-of-Paradise 
(P. minor), King Birds-of-Paradise (Cicinnurus regius), and the 
following species new to the Collection :— 

1 Fairy Bluebird (/rena turcosa) from Java, 2 Blue-eyed 
Ravens (Jacrocorax fuscicapillus), 1 New Guinea Pitta (Pitta 
nove-guinee), and 3 Duperrey’s Megapodes (Meyapodius du- 
perreyi) from the Aru Islands; and 2 Pied Kgrets (Wotophoy« 
flavirostris) from South-west New Guinea. 


Mr. R. H. Burne, M.A., V.P.Z.S., exhibited a number of 
preparations showing some adaptations for the nourishment of 
the embryos of Elasmobranchs. 


71% 


1060 THE SECRETARY ON ADDITIONS TO THE MENAGERIE. 


Mr. R. E. Savage exhibited two abnormal Herrings (Clupea 
harengus), taken by trawl in the North Sea. The first specimen 
had neither pelvic fins nor girdle (pelvic bones). The usual 
position of base of fins was indicated externally by the presence 
of the characteristic elongated scales. The usual musculature 
was present internally. The second specimen lacked the left 


pelvic fin and pelvic bone; the musculature was complete. 


Messrs. E. Heron-Auten, F.L.S., F.Z.S.,and Arraur Ear.ann, 
F.R.M.S., read a paper on the Foraminifera of the Kerimba 
Archipelago, obtained by Dr. J. J. Simpson in the years 1907-8. 

This paper has been published in the ‘ Transactions.’ 


Mr. W. L. Distant communicated his Report on the Rhyn- 
chota collected by the Wollaston Expedition im Dutch New 
Guinea. 


This paper has been published in the ‘ Transactions.’ 


November 10, 1914. 


Prof. E. W. MacBrarpz, M.A., D.Sc., F.R.S., Vice-President, 
in the Chair. 


The Srcrerary read the following report on the additions to 
the Society’s Menagerie during the month of October 1914 :— 

The number of registered additions to the Society’s Menagerie 
during the month of October was 290. Of these 268 were 
acquired by presentation, 15 were received on deposit, 6 in 
exchange, and 1 was born in the Gardens. 

The number of departures during the same period, by death 
and removals, was 207. 


Amongst the additions special attention may be directed to :— 


A Collection of Birds presented by Sir Walter Gilbey, Bart., 
F.Z.8., on October 12th, consisting of a Hunstein’s Bird-of- 
Paradise (Diphyllodes hunsteini) trom South-east New Guinea, 
a Hildebrandt’s Starling (Spreo hildebrandti) from Kast Africa 
(new to the Collection), a Hunting Crow (Cissa chinensis) from 
India, and a number of other rare birds. 

A Collection of Birds from Chili, presented by Geo. H. F. 
Duncan, F.Z.S., on October 22nd, containing 10 Cayenne Lap- 
wings (Belonopterus cayennensis), 2 Chilian Sea-Hagles (Gera- 


noaétus melanolewcus), 5 Gay’s Finches (Phrygilus gayi), and 
others. 


BIRTH OF A PORPOISE AT BRIGHTON AQUARIUM. 1061 


2 Red-necked Phalaropes (Phalaropus hyperboreus), from 
Iceland, new to the Collection, presented by W. H. St. Quintin, 
F.Z.8., on October 8th. 


The Secretary exhibited a photograh showing Oysters 
growing upon mangroves at Lobito Bay, Portuguese West 
Africa. 


Mr. R. H. Burne, M.A., V.P.Z.S., exhibited some paraffin 
Simulacra of Molluscan and other Shells made accidentally by 
Dr. C. V. Ariens Kappers while embedding objects for the 
microtome. During this process, paraffin in a molten state 
inadvertently escaped from the mould and set in the shell-forms 
shown, probably owing to distorted crystallization. 


Mr. H. R. Hoce, M.A., F.Z.S., read his Report on the Spiders 
collected by the British Ornithologists’ Union and Wollaston 
Expeditions in Dutch New Guinea. 

This paper will be published in the ‘ Transactions.’ 


Lirth of a Porpoise at the Brighton Aquarium. 


Mr. Lewis H. James, B.A., F.Z.8., communicated the following 
notes upon the birth of a porpoise at the Brighton Aquarium :— 

On the 26th May, 1914, a female porpoise (Phocena communis) 
was caught in a kettle-net at Dungeness. She was transferred 
to a sluice immediately she was landed and left there for a short 
time. She was then seen to be inanadvanced stage of pregnancy. 
Later, she was transferred by road and rail to Brighton Aquarium, 
where she was placed in a tank containing 110,000 gallons of 
sea-water. During the journey the porpoise was wrapped in 
wet blankets and the eyes and nares were frequently sponged 
with sea-water. On being placed in the tank, she seemed in good 
condition and swam well. 

On the afternoon of Sunday, 31st May, the porpoise seemed to 
be in great pain. She swam to and fro in the tank, resting at 
intervals on the surface. This was about 3.15 p.m., and from 
this time typical labour movements set in. While lying at the 
surface of the tank she made straining movements by arching 
her back, and in about half an hour the first signs of the offspring 
appeared in the form of the tail. Labour was now very strained, 
and the mother appeared in great pain, probably owing to the 
fact of a breach presentation. About one-half of the young was 
forced out by spasmodic contractions, while presentation was 
completed by a final forced contraction. The whole process 
lasted from 3.15 to 5.50 P.M. 


1062 MR. R. I. POCOCK ON 


The cord was still attached to the mother, but was soon brqken 
‘after she had swum 20 yards or so. 

After the birth of the young, which was a still-born male, ihe 
mother was much easier, and before long was swimming about 
normally. After about five hours, the first signs of the after- 
birth appeared and was suecessfully passed 44 ‘hours later. As 
described to me by the superintendent who witnessed it, the after- 
birth was ‘a chamois leather-like paunch” and weighed 13 lbs, 
Unfortunately it was thrown away. There were slight straining- 
movements during the passing of the placenta, but very little 
bleeding. 

The young weighed 7 lbs. approximately and measured 2 feet 
2 inches. It was perfectly formed, and its skin was soft, 
resembling a kid glove. 

The mother died on Wednesday, 10th June—probably, if she 
had been allowed to remain in the sluice for a time, the fetus 
would have turned successfully, and both mother and young 
would have been saved. On the journey between Lewes and 
Brighton the mother passed a certain amount of foaming blood 
through her nostrils, but when placed in the tank seemed to 
be perfectly fit. 

The mother and young are at present at Brighton to be mounted 
for the local Museum. 


Pine and Beech Martens. 
(Text-figures 1-4.) 
Mr. R. I. Pocock, F.R.S8., F.L.S., F.Z.S., Curator of Mammals, 


gave an exhibition, illustrated by lantern-slides, to show some 
newly noted points of difference between the Pine Marten (J/artes 
martes) and the Beech Marten (Jartes foina) and remarked :— 
“The cranial and dental differences between these two species, 
pointed out by Mr. E. R. Alston in 1879 (P. Z. 8. 1879, p. 468), 
are well known, and have been recently restated by Miller (Cat. 
Mamm. Western Europe, 1912). Alston scarcely dealt with 
external characters, and Miller, when deseribing J/. foina, dis- 
missed them as follows: ‘‘ external form as in J/. martes, but fur 
of less fine quality ; colour usually more greyish or drab than 
in IW. martes and seldom with the rich brown tints of [that] 
species, the throat patch never strongly tinged with yellow.” 

From this it might be inferred that the only external differences 
between the two species are found in the texture and colour of 
the fur. That the differences in the structure of the ears and 
feet I am about to describe were overlooked by Miller, must 
presumably be attributed to his working with dried skins and 
not with specimens preserved in alcohol. The material upon 


PINE AND BEECH MARTENS. 1063 


which my conclusions are based are two examples of I. martes 
and one of MJ. foina, sent from France to the Gardens for 
Mr. Thompson Seton. They were not quite adult, but practically 
of the same size. They died upon the same day in September, 
after being kept under precisely similar conditions, and were 
preserved in alcohol for the investigation of external characters. 
Ears.—All the Pine and Beech Martens that have been ex- 
hibited within my recollection in the Gardens could be distin- 
guished at once, when seen side by side, by the difference in the 


Text-figure 1. 


Pine Marten (Martes martes). 


size of the ears (text-figs. 1 & 2). In the Pine Marten these 
organs are relatively longer and wider and appear in consequence 
to be more pricked, so that the animal looks more alert than the 
Beech Marten. Moreover, the narrower ears in the latter niake 
the intervening space on the crown wider, and the whole head has 
a broader look than in the Pine Marten. The actual differences 
in dimensions in the ears are shown in the subjoined table of 
measurements (p. 1068). In details of structure the ears are 
much alike, as might perhaps be expected. In both species there 


1064 MR. R. I. POCOCK ON 


is a very distinct lobe upon the “antihelix”*; but whereas in 
M. foina this lobe is thick and fleshy, in W/. martes it is com- 
pressed and scale-like. Finally, the integumental flap at the back 
of the ear, like the pinna of the ear itself, is longer in J/. martes 
than in J, foina (text-fig. 3). 

It is probable that the length and breadth of the ears will be 
found to vary locally in both MW. martes and IM. foina; but many 
more measurements than have as yet been taken must be 
recorded before the average difference in size of these organs 
between the two species can be established. 


Text-figure 2. 


Beech Marten (Martes foina), 


Feet.—From the appearance of living animals I supposed at 
one time that J/. martes was a longer legged form than J/. foina; 
but measurements of specimens in the flesh show that this is 
not so. The feet are apparently of practically the same shape 
in the two. The four main digits are separated by subequal 
intervals and webbed, as in the Canide, practically to the level 
of the proximal margins of the digital pads. These digits, more- 
over, are very nearly symmetrical in the sense that the second 
and fifth and the third and fourth toes are respectively almost 


* The plica principalis of Boas, ‘ Ohrknorpel und ausserer Ohr,’ 1912. 


PINE AND BEECH MARTENS. 1065 


Text-figure 3. 


A. Head of M. martes, with ear fully expanded. 
1. Lobe on antihelix. 
B. The same of UW. foina. 
A}. Side view of ear of M. martes, with the posterior half folded forwards 
to show the flap (f°) on the back of it. 
B}. The same of UW. foina. 


1066 MR. R. I. POCOCK ON 


ona level. The area of the sole between the plantar and digital 
pads is thickly hairy except for narrow naked streaks, visible 
when the hairs are parted, running forwards from the plantar 
pad towards the digital pads. The area behind or above the 
plantar pad is also covered with hair, except that in the fore foot 
there are two carpal pads, a larger (hypothenar) on the ulnar 
side of the middle line and a much smaller (thenar) on the radial 
side. These two carpal pads are separated by a considerable 
space from the plantar pad and by a very narrow hair-covered 
space from one another. The main portion of the plantar pad 
of both fore and hind feet is nearly bilaterally symmetrical, 
consisting of the three normal lobes corresponding to the four 
principal digits, but behind the inner lobe corresponding to the 
second digit there is an accessory lobe or pad corresponding to 
the first digit. The digital pads and the lobes of the plantar 
pads are concentrically striate, and the summits of the lobes of 
the plantar pad on the hind foot are crowned with a cluster of 
small close-set papillee *. 

In the particulars described above the feet of the two species 
are alike; but so far as the pads are concerned considerable 
differences may be noticed. The pads of JZ. foina may be de- 
scribed as normal in size; the digitals are broadly elliptical and 
a little longer than and nearly twice as wide as those of I. martes. 
a plantar and carpal pads also are larger and encroached upon 
by hair to a much lesser extent in J/, foina than in J/. martes. 
In the hind foot of J/. martes indeed the plantar pad may be 
said to be reduced to four striate tubercles joined by narrow 
strips of hairless, soft, unstriated integument. These differences 
are Shown in the figures and in the subjoined table of measure- 
ments (p. 1068). The smaller size of the pads in JS, martes makes 
the digits appear to be longer than in J. foina, but there does 
not seem to be actually any difference in this respect between the 
two species (text-fig. 4). 

The hair on the metatarsal area is much thicker and woollier 
in texture in J. martes than in M/. foina. 

Ido not suppose that the distinguishing points in the pads 
above pointed out will be found to be absolutely constant in all 
specimens of these two Martens from different localities and at 
all seasons of the year; but I strongly suspect that closely corre- 
sponding differences will prove to obtain between specimens 
collected in the same countries or latitudes at the same season of 
the year. It is possible that in both species the pads are more 
overgrown with hai in northern than in southern individuals, 
and in winter than in summer, These points have, I believe, 
yet to be worked out in detail. But it was that possibility I 
had in mind when stating that the examples I examined, all 
probably Central European, died upon the same day and had 


* Martens are prodigious jumpers, and the papillz on the plantar pads probably 


per iate the likelihood of slipping during their leaping pursuit of Squirrels through 
the trees. 


PINE AND BEECH MARTENS. 1067 


been previously kept for several weeks under precisely similar 
conditions *. 


Text-figure 4. 


Cee 


NON Zenda 
My it \ bs aN He 4 
NIU AY 
. ay A 
(as) 


A. Fore foot of MW. martes. | 3B. Fore foot of I. foina. 
A!, Hind foot of the same. | B!. Hind toot of the same. 


* Miller’s statement (op. cit. p. 368) that the feet of IZ. martes are densely furred 
throughout in winter is certainly not always, if it is sometimes, true. It is con- 
tradicted by the skins of two Cumberland specimens, killed on Dee. 5th, and pre- 
served in the British Museum. The pads in these are quit> obviously bare and not 
even concealed, much less overgrown, by the fur of the sole. 


1068 ON PINE AND BEECH MARTENS. 


Subjoined are the principal measurements of examples of the 
Pine and Beech Martens, elucidating the points above described. 


M.martes., M. foina. | 


| | 
Length of head and body .................0:2e0+.+-....], 380 mm.| 3880 mm. | 
5 tar without tubs... sss. 0. sscseocenen che MEL Od oar Lis ee 

is hind Tepstromphocks.,-saanee essen ee rere Sle SI; 

iS front leestrom\elbowse.sc-se+- nc. ese se ses ces || ee OMe LOT 5. 
| o Car ibromMunNOeCM eaeetesscs- tho ceereeee es aes aL 3 Bivane a 
| Wadthvotearitullyispreadinccss.ue-e sede scene exe eeeeene Se on na aes tt 


Length of median lobe of plantar pad of fore foot... 
|: Wadthiofidithow::. :\ivees cnet acs sccss eee ere ae 

Width of pad excl. pollical lobe .....................44- 1 
| Genephiotend: diciiall pains scrpssvesceneseeeemaneeeneees 

Width of ditto RGaeenicegie tals st toe eehid oe eee ae 
engthrotilarcercarpalpadiss:..crsn.ssssnaseese eee 
| Width of ditto eairewese 


Orc WsTO1rm Or 


The dimensions in millimetres of four specimens published by 
Miller may be compared with those set forth above :— 


} 


M. martes. M. foina. 
Como. | Minorea. Switzerland. ces, 
| Length of head and body ...... 470 430 453 403 
| Sue Stallion: Aspe eee well O35 230 260 | 255 
Ba mbindtoober. secu loas6 87 85 eee 
“p CA Ae rae CEE Ss 42 45 34 | 39 


Making the necessary allowances for errors in small respects 
and for variations due to the “personal equation” of the col- 
lectors, this table bears out on the whole the contention that the 
ears are longer in J/. martes than in I. foina. The Swiss speci- 
men of the latter, an adult male from St. Gallen, has remarkably 
short ears, whereas the Cretan example, regarded by Miller as 
representing a distinct species (JZ. bunites), has these organs a 
little longer than the specimen of J/. foina measured by myself, 
although, judging by the length of the hind foot, it was a smaller 
animal *, Miller described it as a “young adult male.” It 
must be remembered in this connection that the ears in young 
mammals are always relatively longer than in the adults and 
probably do not increase appreciably in length after the subadult 
stage is reached. Clearly, however, the average length of the ear 
in the three examples of J/. foina is much less than the average 
length of the ear in the three examples of MW. martes, the 
dimensions being approximately 37 and 43 respectively.” 

* The shortness of the tail and of the head and body in my examples is probably 


attributable to the shrinkage of specimens preserved in alcohol, which could not be 
properly straightened. 


PURPOSE AND INTELLIGENCE IN THE FORAMINIFERA. 1069 


November 24, 1914. 


Prof. E. A. Mincurn, M.A., F.R.S., Vice-President, 
in the Chair, 


Mr. E. T. Newron, F.R.S., F.Z.S., exhibited a series of bones 
of animals showing indications of natural repair, and a number 
of teeth of a female Sperm-Whale (Physeter macrocephalus). 


Purpose and Intelligence in the Foraminifera. 


Messrs. KE. Herron-Auuen, F.L.S., F.Z.S., and Arraur 
Bartanp, F.R.M.S., discussed the Phenomena of “ Purpose ” 
and ‘‘ Intelligence ” exhibited by the Arenaceous Foraminifera 
in the construction of their tests. They observed that W. B. 
Carpenter had stated in 1885 that the highest development of 
function and behaviour of protoplasm in the Protozoa was to be 
found in the study of the Foraminifera, and they exhibited slides 
of porcellanous and hyaline species, calling attention to the fact 
that of two groups of the same Zoological Order, constructed of 
the same simple protoplasmic element and living under similar 
conditions, one group secretes calcium carbonate and the other 
strontium sulphate from the same sample of sea-water, for the 
construction of their shells. 

The behaviour of many species of Arenaceous Foraminifera in 
constructing their tests reveals a development of “ purpose” 
amounting to what in the Metazoa would be termed “ intelli- 
gence.” his display of intelligence and purpose takes two forms: 
(i) The exclusive selection of certain materials out of a prepon- 
derating mass of other and more readily utilizable materials; and 
(ii) the manner in which those materials are used. This latter 
is subdivided under two heads—(a) to meet the requirements of 
the organism in adapting itself to environmental circumstances, 
and (6) to protect itself against the attacks of parasitic worms 
and other enemies. 

Lantern-slides were shown, and the actual specimens exhibited 
under microscopes upon the table, to illustrate the following 
phenomena :—1, The selection of magnetite by Haplophragmium 
agglutinans and of topaz and garnet by Vernewilina polystropha, 
for the construction and decoration (?) of their tests. 2. The 
utilization of foraminiferal shells by certain abyssal worms, and 
the method employed by Pectinaria auricoma in “ laying” frag- 
ments of sponge-spicules of even length in the construction of 
its tube. 38. Psammosphera parva Flint, which builds a mono- 
thalamous shell of sand-grains round a long sponge-spicule, 
which is used as a “catamaran” spar to buoy it up upon the 
bottom ooze. 4. Psammosphera bowmani WHeron-Allen & 
Earland, which constructs its shell of flakes of mica cemented 


LOTTO EGG OF THE NEW GUINEA RIFLE-BIRD. 


together at their edges to form a transparent polyhedral test. 
5. Psammosphera rustica H.-A. & E., which constructs a 
polyhedral test between long ‘‘ catamaran” spicules, filling the 
interspaces with fragments of spicules of graduated length and 
occasionally using a triaxial spicule to fill an awkward space or 
angle. 6. Vouria harrisii H.-A. & E., which supports itself, 
aperture uppermost, upon the mud by means of spicules pro- 
jecting at the aboral end of the test. 7. Haliphysema 
tumanowiezii Bowerbank, which protects its aperture from 
parasitic worms with an investment of projecting spicules. 
8. Crithionina pisum Goés, var. hispida Brady, 9. Paulina 
jetireysti Carpenter, and 10. Hyperammina ramosa Brady, 
which protect themselves with a close investment of spicules 
all over their shells. 11. JJarsipella cylindrica Brady, which 
protects its aperture with a crown of loosely aggregated spicules. 
12. Marsipella spiralis H.-A. & E., which arranges the spicules 
of which it is constructed in a left-handed spiral to give tensional 
strength. 13. Technitella legumen Norman, which constructs its 
shell of fragments of spicules in two layers, the inner layer being 
laid at right angles to the outer. 14. Techunitella thompsoni 
H.-A. & E., which selects from the environmental material for 
the construction of its test nothing but the perforated plates of 
an ophiurid or echinoderm. 

In the opinion of the authors, ‘ purpose” and “ intelligence ’ 
are revealed by these phenomena. If they depended on surface- 
tension, all the individuals in a dredging would exhibit the same 
phenomena, and the theory of natural selection resulting m the 
survival of the fittest is met by the reply that these selective 
and purposive individuals constitute a marked minority in the 
dredgings in which they are found. 

An interesting discussion followed, in which, amongst others, 
Sir H. H. Howorth, F.R.S., Sir E. Ray Lankester, F.R.S., and 
the Secretary took part. 


? 


Egg of the New GuineaRifle-bird. 


My. D. Seru-Suirn, F.Z.8., Curator of Birds, exhibited an egg 
of the New Guinea Rifle-bird (Ptilorhis intercedens) which had 
been laid in the Society’s Gardens in July last. The bird that laid 
it belonged to Mr. HE. J. Brook, F.Z.S., who had kindly lent 
it in the hope that it might pair with a male belonging to 
the Society. While in Mr. Brook’s aviaries in Scotland, this 
bird paired with a male of its species, and in 1911 and 1912 
constructed a nest and laid eggs, but in both cases they were 
infertile. 

The birds were placed last spring in the Summer Aviary, where 
they appeared to do well, and in July the female built a nest, 
composed of dead leaves and dry vrass, in a bush, about five feet 
from the ground, and laid two eggs. She sat well and was not 


DENTAL VARIATIONS IN MAMMALIAN SKULLS, 1071 


disturbed in any way, but about three weeks after the eggs were 
laid they were apparently thrown out of the nest by the “sitting 
bird, for they were found broken upon the ground. Neither 
appeared to have been fertilized. The one least damaged was 
saved, 

This is the first instance of any species of Paradise-bird laying 
in these Gardens, and the eggs laid in Mr. Brook’s aviaries were 
the first ever laid in captivity. The bird that laid these eggs 
was captured on the nest in New Guinea by Mr. Goodfellow, and 
the nest and two eggs upon which she was sitting are now in the 
British Museum. 

The egg is very similar to that of the Greater Bird of Paradise 
(Paradisea apoda), and, so far as we know, characteristic of the 
whole Broun The ground-colour is cream, bold streaks of 
reddish brown radiating from the larger end and overlaying 
fainter splashes of pale grey. 


Dentat Variations i im M ammalian Skulls. 


Dr. Roperr Roan, G. M. Z. S., exhibited :— 


(1) A number of skulls of Zrichosurus vulpecula illustrating 
dental variations. Normally upper p’ is situated 2°5 mm. behind 
the canine. Two skulls exhibited show it from *5 mm. to 1 mm. 
behind the canine. One skull shows on the left side p' closely 
pressed against the canine, and on the right side the two teeth 
fused together. Another skull shows the p entirely absent. 
In the lower jaw normally the small tooth behind the large 
incisor is close to it. One jaw shown has the second tooth 
2 mm. behind the large incisor. A second jaw has 2 mm. 
behind the normally placed second tooth a third small tooth, 
which may be either a third incisor, a canine, or a first 
premolar. 


(2) A skull of Phascolarctus cinereus showing in the right 
lower jaw a small tooth behind the large incisor, resembling 
in position the second tooth in the medinle of Tr falvecninne 
vulpecula. 


(3) A series of skulls of Chrysochloris hottentota and C. asiatica 
illustrating the peculiar loss of teeth found in nearly all sexually 
mature Moles in the Stellenbosch district,S. Africa. As Dr. Broom 
pointed out in 1907, C. hottentota, when probably. two years old 
and when in full sexual activity, suffers from a disease of the 
gums, probabiy pyorrheea, and the teeth become loose and fall 
out. The disease appears also to damage the developing second 
set, which never fully replaces the lost milk set, and hence 
specimens are found where the disease has been arrested in a 
practically toothless condition. 

It is very interesting to note that these toothless specimens 


1072 DR. R. BROOM ON 


appear to be in fairly good health. In their stomachs are the 
remains of worms broken into segments, as in the fully toothed 
individuals. ° 

Though specimens in a similar condition have been obtained 
from other parts of S. Africa, they are rare. 

Chrysochloris asiatica varely suffers with its jaws, but a speci- 
men was exhibited in which the disease had led to extensive 
injury to the bone. 

(4) A skull of Chrysochloris hottentota with only eight teeth in 
each upper jaw, though there are the normal nine on each side 
of the lower. 


A new Thecodont Reptile. 


(Text-figures 1, 2.) 


INDEX. Page 
Eosucura, new suborder of THECODONTIA ......... 1077 
SVOUNP INI ey LAIN. MOMs ay seeneneees<ceancsiedeese-enee rene TA 
Youngina capensis, gen. et 8p. Ne .......seceeeescee ees 1075 


Dr. Broom also exhibited the skull of a new type of Thecodont 
reptile (Youngina capensis) from the Upper Permian beds of 
South Africa, and remarked :— 

“ Hitherto, though there has been some evidence of the occur- 
rence of primitive Thecodonts in the Karroo beds of Upper 
Permian age, no satisfactory skull has been known. Some years 
ago I described the two types, Heleosaurus scholtzi and Heleo- 
philus acutus, both of Middle Permian age, and Watson is 
describing another form of the same age which may be allied. 
Unfortunately, little is known of the skull in any of these types. 

The new form which I ain exhibiting was found by me at New 
Bethesda, Cape Colony, in beds which are in the Cistecephalus 
zone, at least 600-1000 ft. below the Lystrosawrus zone, and most 
probably belong to the Upper Permian age. 

The specimen consists of the almost perfect skull of a small 
crocodile-like reptile, with a considerable series of vertebra, but 
unfortunately with no satisfactory remains of limbs or girdles, 

The skull measures about 60 mm. in greatest length, and is - 
42 mm. in width. The tip of the snout is missing, but as the 
anterior ends of the lower jaws are preserved, very little can 
have been lost. 

The orbits, which are situated near the middle of the skull, 
are large and are directed upwards and outwards. The antero- 
posterior diameter of the orbitis 17mm. The interorbital width 
is about 8 mm, 

Behind the orbit is an infratemporal fossa slightly smaller 
than the orbit, and a supratemporal fossa about a third of the 
size of the infratemporal. 


A NEW THECODONT REPTILE, 1073 


The premaxillaries are lost but must have been small. 

The nasals are imperfect and crushed; they are manifestly 
fairly large. The nostrils must be situated well forward. 

The maxilla is long and narrow, and on the right side shows 
16 rounded pointed teeth. The complete series is probably about 
21, a number evidently having been shed and were being replaced. 
The posterior end of the maxilla passes under the orbit, and has 
a long articulation with the jugal. 


Text-figure 1. 


Upper side of skull of Foungina capensis. About 13 times nat. size. 


Fr., frontal; IP., interparietal; Ju., jugal; Na., nasal; Pa, parietal; Po., Par- 
occipital: Po.F., posttrontal; Po.O., postorbital; Pr.., prefrontal; Q.J., 
quadratojugal ; So., supraoccipital ; Sq., squamosal ; Tb., tabular. 


The lacrymal is not well preserved on either side, but is 
manifestly small. 

The prefrontal is a fair sized element. It forms the upper 
and anterior border of the orbit, and, with the postfrontal, 
nearly shuts out the frontal from the orbit. 

The frontal is moderately large. It extends in front a little 
beyond the plane of the front of the orbit, and behind as far as 
the plane passing through the front of the pineal foramen. 


Proc. Zoou, Soc.—1914, No. LX XII, 12 


1074 DR. R. BROOM ON 


The jugal is a long triradiating bone. Its anterior process ~ 
forms the lower border of the orbit, and passes forward between 
the lacrymal and the maxilla. The ascending process passes up 
behind the orbit to articulate with the postorbital ; while the 
posterior process forms the lower border of the infratemporal 
_ fossa, and lies above and internal to the quadratojugal, 

The postfrontal is a small triangular bone which forms the 
upper and anterior border of the orbit, and the anterior border 
of the supratemporal fossa. It articulates with the frontal and 
parietal internally, and the postorbital externally. 


Text-figure 2. 


————__— 


eas So 

AMM MP HH: Fp a 

WY oe i > ihe ieee 
“Yj 


thn 


VE 


8 Yi 
IW B Yj 
1) tf YH). 
@ YY 


TS Z LYM - Ju. Mx. ae wlan 
aie oe TU 


4. 
Y 


Uy, 


So. fess 
Sa. 
Wi, er 
ese: aie ao 


‘ 
. ” 
— B 


A. Side view of skull of Youngina capensis. About 1} nat. size. 
B. Occiput of Youngina capensis. About 1} nat. size. 
IP., interparietal; Ju., jugal; La., lacrymal; Mx., maxilla: Pa., parietal; 
Pa.O., paroccipital; Po.F., postfrontal: Po.O., postorbital; Pr.F., prefrontal ; 


ne euereiee Q.J., quadratojugal; So., supraoccipital; Sq., squamosal ; 


The postorbital is moderately large. It forms part of the 
postorbital margin and most of the bar between the two 
temporal fosse. The posterior process is well developed and 
passes back between the squamosal and the tabular. 

The parietals are smaller than the frontals. Between them is 
a fairly large pineal foramen. The posterior process of the 


A NEW THECODONT REPTILE. 1075 


parietal is directed outwards and backwards, as in lizards and 
Sphenodon, and rests on the bone which I believe to be the 
tabular. 

The structure of the post-temporal region is a little difficult to 
make out, but as it is well preserved on ‘both sides the difficulty 
consists largely in distinguishing cracks from sutures, and I 
think there is practically no doubt but that the elements are 
as I have figured them. Whether my interpretation of them 
is correct is, of course, another matter. 

Forming the posterior border of the infratemporal fossa is a 
fair sized triangular bone, which [ believe to be the squamosal. 
It articulates above with the postorbital, and below it probably 
articulates with the quadratojugal. The quadrate is very largely 
hidden by it. 

With the posterior end of the jugal articulates an element 
which I believe to be the quadratojugal. Unfortunately its - 
posterior portion is not seen on either side. It cannot be a part 
of the element which I identify as squamosal. The relations of 
the quadratojugal, squamosal, and jugal are somewhat similar 
to those in Sphenodon. 

Along the upper and posterior side of the squamosal lies 
another element of considerable size, which I believe to be the 
tabular. In front it meets the postorbital, and its inner side is 
partly covered by the posterior process of the parietal. Posteriorly 
it articulates with the paroccipital (opisthotic). 

Behind the parietals and above the supraoccipital is a fair sized 
and certainly distinct interparietal. Possibly it is paired. 

The occiput, though fairly well preserved, does not show the 
limits of the various elements. The supraoccipital is low and 
broad ; the exoccipitals are probably small, and there are short 
paroccipitals directed backwards and outwards. Between the 
sides of the supraoccipital and the tabulars are a pair of narrow 
fosse. On the whole the resemblance of the occiput to that of 
the lizard is considerable, the presence of a distinct interparietal 
being the only important difference. 

The mandibles, though present and complete, have not been 
cleared of matrix, as it would be difticult to do so without 
injuring the teeth, and the presence of the mandibles renders 
it impossible to display the palate. 

For this new reptilian type I propose the name Youngina 
capensis, in honour of the late Mr. John Young, LL.D., F.G.S., 
Under-Curator of the Hunterian Museum, Glasgow University, 
to whose early assistance and kindly encouragement I am mainly 
indebted for my interest in paleontology. 

Though Youngina cannot be placed close to any previously 
well-known type, we can nevertheless give it a fairly definite 
place in the reptilian series. 

If we exclude the Cotylosauria, the Therapsida, the. Chelonia, 
the Ichthyosauria, and the Plesiosauria, all the remaining orders 

i 


1076 DR. R. BROOM ON 


. may be grouped together as reptiles with two temporal arches or 
modifications of the same type. In Sphenodon we have a simple 
modification of the type; in the Crocodile another, and in the 
Lizards a third where the lower arch is lost. Among extinct 
forms we have many other modifications. The Phytosaurs and 
Pseudosuchians afford the best known Triassic types, and other 
varieties of the type are seen in the Gnathodonts and the Dino- 
saurs. Youngina represents a type more primitive than any 
previously known, and one which is especially important in that 
it is very near to the ancestral form. 

The Pseudosuchian, Huparkeria, which I recently described 
from the South African Upper Triassic beds, bears considerable 
resemblance to Youngina but is very manifestly a much later 
type. It has lost the large pineal foramen seen in Youngina, 
and the post-temporal region differs considerably through the 
loss of the tabular, the reduction in size of the squamosal, and 
the increased development of the quadratojugal and quadrate. 
Yet such a type as Yuparkeria might readily be descended from 
a form like Youngina. 

Euparkeria further represents a type from which the Thero- 
podous Dinosaurs might be derived, but is too far advanced to 
have been ancestral either to the Sauropoda or Predentata. 
Youngina, on the other hand, retains the characters that we 
require in the ancestor at least of the Sauropoda, and possibly . 
also of the Predentata. 

But the most interesting point in the structure of Youngina is 
the light it throws on the origin of lizards. 

No point in reptilian structure has given rise to so many 
different opinions as the nature of the post-temporal region’ in 
lizards. In Sphenodon there is no difficulty. There is low down 
an undoubted quadratojugal, and between this and the parietal 
a single large bone which is unquestionably the squamosal. In 
the typical lizards, on the other hand, between the top of the 
quadrate and the parietal are two small bones, and the difficulty 
is to determine which is the squamosal. The upper and inner 
bone has been regarded as the squamosal by Gegenbaur, Baur, 
Gaupp, Case, and Watson; the lower and outer by Parker, 
Huxley, Cope, Boulenger, and Williston. Until a year ago I 
favoured the view of Baur, but the study of the Mosasaur skulls 
in the American Museum led me to adopt the view of Williston, 
that the outer bone is the squamosal and the inner the tabular. 

About a dozen years ago I made a study of the development 
of the pterygo-quadrate bar in a number of lizard types, and 
found that the lower end of the quadrate is fixed to the lower 
end of the epipterygoid by a small bar of cartilage almost exactly 
as in Sphenodon. So strikingly similar is the condition that it 
seems extremely probable that there was in the ancestral lizard 
a lower bar as in Sphenodon. 


While Youngina is certainly not a lizard, it throws very definite 


A NEW THECODONT REPTILE: 1077 


light on the nature of the lacertilian post-temporal bones. The 
upper arch is formed mainly by the postorbital but partiy by a 
lower bone which I regard as squamosal. Whatever this lower 
bone is, it is quite certainly the homologue of the outer post- 
temporal bone of the lizard, and as there is a quadratojugal still 
lower down, it cannot be the quadratojugal. From its relations 
to the quadrate, there seems little doubt but that it is correctly 
identified as the squamosal. 

The bone internal to it may be the so-called ‘ supra-temporal,” 
but from its articulating with the paroccipital it seems much 
more likely to be the tabular. 

Youngina may be regarded as the type genus of a new family, 
which may be called Younginide, and it must also be placed in a 
new suborder of the Thecodontia, which may be called the 


KosucHIA. 


The Eosuchia may be defined as Thecodont reptiles which have 
no antorbital vacuity, and retain the interparietal and tabular 
bones, and have a large pineal foramen.” 


2 


' mre, pee: rere: 1. 
Lome eee gts Wy % : i* igen, sieeiithys 
MEM Se as te 
LE a aa ee arte 
ange: Cae, vitveud t: mitt 

ah ey , ens HR a wht * 

seed, (gh aes So af ite fe eet) 


tol Ma JAR #7 


4 


me 


Exhibitions and Notices (continued). 


Mr. D. Serx-Suitn, F.Z.S., Curator of Birds, Exhibition of an Egg of the New Guinea 


Dr. 
Dr. 


ee 


Rifle-bird (Ptilorhis intercedens) laid in the Society’s Gardens 
Rozert Broou, C.M.Z.S. Exhibition of Mammalian Skulls showing Dental Variations. 


Rosert Broom, C.M.Z,S. Exhibition of the Skull of a new Thecodont Reptile from 
Dene AMIGA, wr ( hext-imuses! Lf Oi as)" e cae os ie wie « ss tine cee tls a stat oe = mistelon aie. eromie ole 


PAPERS. 


. A remarkable new Cirripede from the Chalk of Surrey and Hertfordshire. By ‘noms 


Be warns, GS... (Plate I, and Dext-fcure 1.) «1.2. ees scseur wee coceseecuees 


. Polycheta from the N.E. Pacific: The Chetopteride. With an Account of the 


Phenomenon of Asexual Reproduction in Phyllochetopterus and the Description of 
Two new Species of Chatopteride from the Atlantic. By F. A. Porrs, M.A., Fellow 
of Trinity Hall, Cambridge, and Balfour Student of the University. (Plates I—-VL., 
sunaneret free UT ec Lehr)! 231 s)aeineiwia Sita -)afriveln 6 cstienje aS ¢ aie «ic oe eines weap amie Bele ne 


, Broomia perplexa, gen. et sp. u., a Fossil Reptile from South Africa, By D. M. 8. 


Warson, M.S8ce., F.Z.8., Lecturer on Vertebrate Paleontology in University College, 
uname atate VL. sands Vext-truKesl—o.). © ja )sis)< chaielo cine) /cie:s)e ons sie oles aieieirs was 


. Hunotosaurus africanus Seeley, and the Ancestry of the Chelonia. By D. M. S. 


Watson, M.S8c., F.Z.S., Lecturer on Vertebrate Paleontology in University College, 
uncon @alate. Vly ands Dextafroure Ws) oc.cisiicinlers a lels aie) eters cielo sieht s cnimisi sie cores « 


. Notes on some Carnivorous Therapsids. By D. M. 8. Watson, M.Se., F.Z 8., Lecturer 


on Vertebrate Palzeontology in University College, London. (Text-figures 1-7.).... 


Contributions to the Anatomy and Systematic Arrangement of the Cestoidea.— 
XV. On a new Genus and Species of the Family Acoleide. By Frank E. 
Bepparp, M.A., D.Sc., F.R.S., F.Z.S., Prosector to the Society. (Text-figures 1-9.).. 


EDEE Ves ee Ometateyeretteepeeetor she eich tatesreh cicte ok teaalSitiiny 0a is sae) sich qisyelay Sioasavcsnc aye Wwiallo) Saotetayous era MaE ates 


Listiot. Councileand: Omicersss se oo eis sek es eee ee Heche tt grace as ey a encna, A, ar acai e d 


Hist of Contentsiy oases. hese eR et gi a Bs it ean LGM Sy xt i ih a oan cpt Rein eevee ie 


Alphabetical List of Contributors 


2 G16 (bea, Me mrnars aia PU nay eg ese ROM cea a rs Set stl eM aap Pte female a. | BNnee LST Spe nemern sa Met day te tet 


945 


1011 


1x 


XV 


LIST OF PLATES. 


. 1914, Parr IV. (pp. 945-1077). 


Wirners: Pl. I. 1-9. Proverruca vinculum, 10-12. Scalpellum 
“ — edinineum wana wo Alls anaes ete aCe meee ; 
Ports: Pl. I. Mesochetopterus taylori ....escecusvevcssees 
II. Mesochetopterus minuta ......0ecseere sevoe 

IIL, Mesochetopterus rh Satara lee een 


es iy 
V. \ Phyllochetopterus prolifica ...4..0e-ceeesseee 

VI. Phyllochatopterus anglicd ssevresesesesenees 
Warson: Pl. VI. Broomia perplexa .+...-sscecccesecceresceas 
Warson: Pl. VII. Eunotosaurus africanus 


NOTICE. 


The ‘ Proceedings’ for the year are issued in four parts, paged ¢ co aseout iy 
so that the complete reference is now P. Z. 8.1914, p. ..+ The Dice: D 
is as follows :— 
Part | I. issued in ‘March. 
prea He ao a June, 
pee (i a September, 


pated th Aes ts December. © 


‘ Proceedings, 1914, Part ITI. (pp. 491-944), were published on n 
September ath 1914. 


The Abstracts of the ‘Proceedings,’ Nos. 
: contained in this Part. 


eetzias 
i Feb ae Hp 


wae ly dave 
iy shied 


Shan sie gyn sale deel ine A 


Sayan dear Aan ve Ne 


Ay vppiienee 


Sey aleng va" 
Hes WA lann > 
Artagreie was\is 
jst 28 t 
big i 
eg eae esiclv? ae 
CARY Libr Aida Nao, MENS AL S “ 


Wiay'at 


Hacer ker 


SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION LIB 


il i 


3 9088 00847 2441