Skip to main content

Full text of "Products and by-products of coal"

See other formats


UNIVERSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA 
AT   LOS  ANGELES 


CANADA 

DEPARTMENT   OF   MINES 

HON.  LOUIS  CODERRE,  MINISTER;    R.  G.  McCONNELL,  DEPUTY  MINISTER. 

MINES  BRANCH 

EUGENE  HAANEL,  PH.D.,  DIRECTOR. 


Products  and  By-Products 
of  Coal 


Edgar  Stansfield,  M.Sc. 

AND 

F.  E.  Carter,  B.Sc.,  Dr.  Ing. 


5732 


OTTAWA 

GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  BUREAU 
1915 


No.  323 


CANADA 

DEPARTMENT  OF   MINES 

HON.  LOUIS  CODERRE,  MINISTER;    R.  G.  McCONNELL,  DEPUTY  MINISTER. 

MINES  BRANCH 

EUGENE  HAANEL,  PH.D.,  DIRECTOR. 


Products  and  By-Products 
of  Coal 


BY 

Edgar  Stansfield,  M.Sc. 

AND 

F.  E.  Carter,  B.Sc.,  Dr.  Ing. 


OTTAWA 
GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  BUREAU 

1915  No.  323 


TT 


Letter  of  Transmittal. 

Dr.  Eugene  Haanel, 

Director  Mines  Branch, 
Department  of  Mines, 
Ottawa. 

Sir  — 

I  beg  to  submit,  herewith,  a  bulletin  on  the  products  and 
by-products  of  coal.  This  bulletin  was  written — in  collabora- 
tion with  Dr.  F.  E.  Carter — under  instructions  received  from 
Mr.  B.  F.  Haanel,  Chief  of  Division  of  Fuels  and  Fuel  Testing. 

I  have  the  honour  to  be, 

Sir, 
Your  obedient  servant, 

(Signed)  Edgar  Stansfield. 
OTTAWA,  November  6,  1914. 


iii 


285053 


CONTENTS. 

PAGE 

Letter  of  transmittal iii 

Products  and  by-products  of  coal 1 

Introductory '. . . .  1 

PART  I— 

Methods  of  producing  coke,  gas,  ammonia,  and  tar  from  bituminous 

coal 3 

Coal  burned  under  boilers,  and  in  furnaces 3 

Coal  gasified  in  gas  producers 3 

Carbonization  of  coal  in  gas  retorts 4 

City  gas  plants 5 

Coke-oven  plants 7 

Non-recovery  beehive  ovens 7 

Non-recovery  retort  ovens 8 

By-product  retort  ovens 8 

Comparison  of  types  of  coke  ovens 9 

Carbonization  of  peat,  lignite,  etc 11 

Production  of  coke,  gas,  ammonia  and  tar  in  Canada 12 

PART  II— 

Properties  and  uses  of  coal  products  and  the  by-products  of  their 

manufacture 15 

Coke 15 

Uses  of  coke 17 

Gas 20 

Uses  of  gas 24 

Ammonia 25 

Uses  of  ammonia 26 

Cyanides 27 

Coal  tar 28 

Gas-works  tar 28 

Coke-oven  tar 29 

Gas-producer  tar 29 

Water-gas  tar 29 

Uses  of  tar 29 

Distillation  of  tar. . .  30 


PAGE 

Commercial  products  of  coal  tar,  their  uses  and  derivatives ....  33 

Benzol 33 

Solvent  naphtha 33 

Carbolic  acid 34 

Naphthalene 34 

Heavy  oil 34 

Anthracene 35 

Anthracene  oil 35 

Pitch 35 

Coal  tar  in  the  industries 37 

Timber  preservation 37 

Road  making 38 

Disinfectants 38 

Explosives 39 

Power  production 39 

Detergents  and  solvents 40 

Colour  industry 41 

Dr.  Bernhard  C.  Hesse  quoted 42 

Canadian  trade  statistics ...  44 


LIST  OF  TABLES 

I.  Analysis  of  coal  and  of  coke 17 

II.  Typical  gas  analyses 21 

III.  Examples  of  gas  analyses 22 

IV.  Coal  tar  distillation 32 

V.  Diagram  of  coal-tar  products 36 

VI.  Canadian  production,  exports,  and  imports 45 

VII.  Canadian  imports 46 


PRODUCTS  AND  BY-PRODUCTS 

OF 

COAL 


PRODUCTS  AND  BY-PRODUCTS  OF  COAL. 


INTRODUCTORY. 

A  number  of  reports  and  bulletins  bearing  on  certain  phases 
of  the  utilization  of  fuels  have  already  been  published  by  the 
Mines  Branch  of  the  Department  of  Mines.  These  reports 
have  treated  of  anthracite,  bituminous  coal,  lignite,  and  peat; 
have  dealt  with  the  mining  and  winning  of  the  raw  materials, 
methods  of  purification,  and  preparation  for  the  market;  and 
in  addition,  with  the  question  of  the  advantageous  use  of  different 
fuels  for  steam  raising,  and  for  the  generation  of  gas  for  industrial 
purposes  by  means  of  the  gas  producer.  Moreover,  the  subject 
of  coking  coals  has  been  investigated,  as  also  has  the  recovery 
of  by-products  in  connexion  with  the  manufacture  of  coke,  and 
producer  gas.  But,  so  far,  no  report  published  by  the  Mines 
Branch  has  treated,  as  a  whole,  of  the  products  and  by-products 
obtained  from  the  economic  utilization  of  fuels ;  nor  of  the  inter- 
dependence of  the  various  industries  manufacturing  these  com- 
modities, or  using  them  as  raw  materials. 

The  object  of  this  report  is  to  satisfy,  as  far  as  possible, 
the  increasing  need  for  a  monograph  on  fuel  products  and  by- 
products. The  subject,  however,  is  so  comprehensive,  that  it  is 
impossible — within  the  limits  of  a  bulletin — to  treat  it  other  than 
in  outline.  But  notwithstanding  this  limitation,  it  is  hoped  that 
the  data  furnished  may  prove  to  be  a  practical  contribution  to  the 
progress  and  development  of  the  industries  concerned. 

The  subject  matter  of  the  present  report  is  divided  into  two 
parts:  (I)  the  production  of  coke,  gas,  ammonia,  and  tar  from 
bituminous  coal;  and  (II)  the  properties  and  uses  of  these  pro- 
ducts and  by-products.  Other  fuels  than  bituminous  coal  are 
dealt  with,  but  only  in  a  tentative  way,  since  bituminous  coal 
is  of  overwhelmingly  greater  importance  than  any  other  fuel 
as  a  medium  from  which  to  obtain  the  commercial  products 


particularized  in  Part  I.  In  setting  forth  the  results  of  these 
investigations,  the  aim  has  been  to  give  prominence  to  the  com- 
mercial rather  than  to  the  scientific  aspect  of  the  subjects  treated, 
especially  as  regards  their  bearing  on  existing  conditions  in 
Canada. 

The  present  time  is  particularly  opportune  for  discussing 
the  question  of  establishing  new  lines  of  trade  and  commerce; 
for,  on  account  of  the  deplorable  war  conditions  in  Europe,  all 
industries  are  more  or  less  dislocated  as  regards  supply  and 
demand;  and  manufacturers,  everywhere,  are  taking  stock  of 
current  conditions,  and  considering  future  possibilities.  The 
trade  possibility  that  would  naturally  occur  to  most  people 
interested  in  the  commercial  development  of  Canada,  is  the  estab- 
lishment of  a  coal-tar  dye  industry ;  since  here,  as  in  other  coun- 
tries, factories  using  dyes  are  being  seriously  inconvenienced, 
owing  to  the  fact  that  Germany — by  a  combination  of  scientific 
research,  technical  ability,  and  commercial  energy — has  for  years 
had  practically  a  monopoly  in  the  manufacture  and  supply 
of  coal-tar  dyes;  and  consequently,  since  the  opening  of  the 
war,  importation  of  this  commodity  from  Europe  has  almost 
ceased.  A  reference  to  page  46,  however,  will  show  that  the  im- 
portation of  dyes  into  Canada  is  not  large,  and  that  the  prospect  of 
developing  a  flourishing  coal-tar  dye  industry  is  not  encouraging. 
But  offsetting  this  negative  view,  is  a  demonstration  of  the  en- 
couraging fact  that  there  are  other  important  by-products 
from  coal  which,  although  not  figuring  so  prominently  in  the 
public  eye,  are  nevertheless  of  much  greater  importance  com- 
mercially. It  is  shown  that  a  number  of  these  are  peculiarly 
suitable  for  production  in  Canada;  and  the  Dominion  could 
thus  be  rendered  less  dependent  on  foreign  sources  of  supply. 


PART  I. 

METHODS  OF  PRODUCING  COKE,  GAS,  AMMONIA, 
AND  TAR,  FROM  BITUMINOUS  COAL. 

The  employment  of  coal  for  commercial  purposes  may  be 
roughly  classified  under  three  main  divisions  as  follows: — (1), 
the  combustible  matter  in  the  coal  is  completely  burned  with 
an  excess  of  air;  (2),  the  combustible  matter  in  the  coal  is  com- 
pletely gasified  by  partial  combustion  with  a  limited  amount 
of  air,  or  of  air  and  steam ;  and  (3) ,  the  volatile  matter  of  the  coal 
is  vapourized  by  the  application  of  external  heat,  in  the  absence 
of  air. 

Coal  Burned  under  Boilers  and  in  Furnaces. 

In  Class  1,  the  coal  is  burned  under  steam  boilers  and  in 
furnaces,  etc.  The  coal  is  fed  in  and  burned,  heat  is  generated, 
and  ashes  are  left.  In  this  class,  heat  is  the  main  product; 
the  only  by-products  being  the  valueless  ashes  and  furnace 
gases. 

Coal  Gasified  in  Gas  Producers. 

In  Class  2,  the  coal  is  gasified  in  the  producer  by  blowing 
air  and  steam  through  it;  but,  by  limiting  the  quantity  of  air 
supplied  and  having  a  deep  layer  of  fuel,  the  coal  is  not  com- 
pletely oxidized,  hence  the  gas  produced  is  combustible.  In 
this  class  the  combustible  gas  is  the  main  product,  although 
ashes  and  heat  are  necessarily  produced.  The  heat,  which  is 
generally  kept  as  low  as  practicable  by  means  of  the  steam, 
can  be  partially  utilized,  but  is  often  a  total  loss.  The  gas  is 
sometimes  burned  simply  as  a  source  of  heat,  while  in  other 
cases  it  is  utilized  as  a  source  of  power  in  internal  combustion 
engines.  As  the  gas  leaves  the  producer  it  almost  invariably 
contains  more  or  less  ammonia  and  coal  tar,  the  quantities 


varying  with  the  type  of  producer,  with  the  amount  of  steam 
employed,  and  with  the  character  of  the  coal  gasified.  By 
means  of  a  suitable  purifying  plant,  the  ammonia  and  tar  may 
be  recovered  from  the  gas  before  it  is  used.  These  residuals 
are,  therefore,  by-products  from  the  utilization  of  coal  in  gas 
producers. 


The  Carbonization  of  Coal  in  Gas  Retorts. 

In  Class  3,  the  coal  is  carbonized  in  gas  retorts  for  the  pro- 
duction of  coal  gas,  and  in  coke  ovens  for  the  production  of 
coke.  In  both  cases  the  coal  is  heated,  gas  and  other  volatile 
products  pass  off,  and  coke  remains  in  the  retort  or  oven;  but 
in  the  coal  gas  plant  the  gas  is  the  main  product,  the  coke  being 
only  a  by-product ;  whereas  in  the  coke-oven  plant  the  conditions 
are  reversed,  the  gas  being  the  by-product.  In  both  cases, 
however,  the  gas,  as  it  leaves  the  coal,  contains  ammonia  and  coal 
tar  vapours,  and  these  are  recoverable  by-products. 

The  recovery  of  tar  and  ammonia  from  producer  gas  has 
been  described,  and  the  value  of  the  latter  as  a  fertilizer  discussed 
in  a  recent  report  of  the  Mines  Branch  (Report  No.  299,  "Peat, 
Lignite,  and  Coal;  their  Value  as  Fuels  for  the  Production  of 
Power  when  utilized  in  By- Product  Recovery  Producers"). 
The  tar  obtained  from  gas  producers  need  not  be  further  consider- 
ed here,  as  it  is  comparatively  insignificant  in  amount.  This 
latter  condition  is  due  partly  to  the  relatively  small  number 
of  gas-producer  plants  yet  established,  and  partly  to  the  fact 
that,  with  producers  making  gas  for  heating  purposes,  the  tar 
is  generally  burned  with  the  gas,  while  with  few  exceptions, 
power-gas  producers  are  designed  and  operated  to  produce  a 
minimum  of  tar. 

The  by-products  obtained  from  gas  works  and  from  coke- 
oven  plants  are  of  very  great  importance.  Before  discussing 
these  in  detail,  a  brief  description  of  the  plants  themselves  will 
be  given. 


5 
CITY  GAS  PLANTS. 

In  gas  works  the  coal  is  coked  in  large  fireclay  retorts. 
These  retorts  are  set  in  furnaces  heated  with  gas  from  a  producer 
using  coke  as  fuel.  The  details  of  construction  and  methods 
of  operation  vary  greatly,  although  the  general  principles  of 
the  process  remain  the  same.  The  retorts  are  sometimes  cir- 
cular in  cross  section,  and  sometimes  "D"  shaped,  or  oval. 
The  retorts  may  be  set  horizontally,  vertically,  or  in  an  inclined 
position  in  the  furnace.  A  bed  of  retorts  having  been  prepared, 
and  the  furnace  heated  to  the  desired  temperature — which 
is  commonly  about  1100°C. — the  retorts  are  charged  with  coal 
through  a  door  at  the  end,  which  is  then  at  once  closed.  As 
the  temperature  of  the  coal  gradually  rises  to  that  of  the  inside 
of  the  retort,  the  volatile  constituents  are  driven  off,  and  leave 
the  retort  through  pipes  provided  for  the  purpose — coke  being 
ultimately  left  in  the  retort.  The  coke  is  then  removed,  and  a 
fresh  charge  of  coal  inserted .  I  n  some  modern  plants  using  vertical 
retorts,  the  above  process  is  made  continuous,  the  coal  being 
fed  in  at  the  top,  and  the  coke  removed  from  the  bottom.  The 
volatile  products,  consisting  of  gas  and  vapours,  are  led  under 
the  surface  of  the  liquid  in  a  large  horizontal  pipe  known  as  the 
hydraulic  main,  where  some  of  the  condensable  constituents 
are  condensed.  The  impure  gas  leaving  this  main  is  passed 
through  a  series  of  condensers,  scrubbers,  and  purifiers,  and  thus 
cleaned  ready  for  use  for  domestic  heating,  lighting,  etc.  From 
the  hydraulic  main,  condensers,  and  scrubbers  are  obtained 
water  containing  ammonia,  known  as  ammoniacal  liquor,  and  a 
thick,  black  liquid  known  as  coal  tar.  The  ammoniacal  liquor 
is  the  chief  source  of  ammonia,  the  greatest  part  of  which, 
after  conversion  into  ammonium  sulphate,  is  used  on  a  very 
large  scale  as  a  fertilizer.  Coal  tar  is  the  principal  source  of 
the  innumerable  coal-tar  dyes,  etc.,  which  are  described  later. 

As  outlined  above  it  is  manifest  that  gas  is  the  main  product 
from  the  coal;  while  coke,  ammonia,  and  coal  tar  are  obtained 
as  by-products.  Not  only  the  relative  quantity,  but  the  com- 
position of  the  gas,  etc.,  produced,  are  profoundly  changed  by 
varying  the  coal  employed,  the  size  of  the  charge,  the  shape 


and  position  of  the  retorts,  the  temperature  and  duration  of  the 
coking,  or  the  gas  pressure  maintained  in  the  retort.  By 
increasing  the  quantity  of  gas  obtained,  its  quality  is  usually 
decreased;  as  are  also  the  quantity  and  quality  of  the  tar. 
Every  gas  manufacturer  has  to  decide  for  himself  the  best 
working  conditions  for  his  plant;  bearing  in  mind  the  economic 
factors  of  his  particular  district. 

The  coal  gas  supply  for  city  use  is,  to-day,  largely  supple- 
mented by  what  is  known  as  carburetted  water  gas.  In  the 
manufacture  of  water  gas,  coke  or  anthracite  is  burned  in  a  suit- 
able generator,  by  air  being  blown  through  it,  and  is  thus  heated 
to  a  temperature  of  at  least  1100°C.  At  this  point  the  air  blast 
is  cut  off,  and  steam  passed  through  the  incandescent  mass, 
whereby  the  combustible  gases,  carbon  monoxide  and  hydrogen, 
are  produced.  The  reaction  between  the  steam  and  the  hot 
carbon  lowers  the  temperature  in  the  generator;  when, 
however,  the  temperature  falls  too  low  (as  is  shown  by  the 
high  percentage  of  carbon  dioxide  in  the  issuing  gases), 
the  steam  is  cut  off,  and  the  generator  again  re-heated  by  means 
of  the  air  blast.  The  water  gas,  obtained  during  the  period 
when  the  steam  is  passed  through  the  coke,  is  not  rich  enough 
to  replace  coal  gas  for  ordinary  use;  it  can  be  used,  however, 
alone,  or  mixed  with  coal  gas,  after  it  has  been  enriched  or 
carburetted  by  means  of  oil  gas.  This  oil  gas  can  be  made 
from  mineral  oils,  or  from  some  of  the  higher  boiling  oils 
obtained  by  the  distillation  of  coal  tar.  In  either  case  the 
gas  and  oil  are  heated  to  a  high  temperature,  whereby  the  oil 
is  largely  converted  into  permanent  gases  of  high  heating  and 
illuminating  value. 

It  can  be  seen  that,  by  the  use  of  carburetted  water  gas, 
some  of  the  coke  and  the  coal  tar,  obtained  as  by-products  in 
the  coal-gas  plant,  can  be  converted  into  gas,  and  the  quantity 
of  by-products  left  for  disposal,  thus  reduced.  Any  coke  in 
excess  of  the  amount  required  for  heating  the  retort  furnaces, 
or  for  operating  the  water-gas  plant,  is  sold  as  fuel. 


7 
COKE-OVEN  PLANTS. 

The  coking  of  coal  for  the  manufacture  of  coke  is  carried 
out  in  what  are  known  as  coke  ovens.  There  are  two  types 
of  these  in  common  use,  known  respectively  as  beehive  and 
retort  ovens. 

As  already  stated,  coal  during  coking  loses  gas  and  volatile 
matter.  In  some  cases  these  are  immediately  burned  in  or 
adjacent  to  the  ovens,  and  produce  the  heat  required;  in  other 
cases  the  volatile  matter  is  collected,  its  more  valuable  constit- 
uents saved,  and  only  the  residual  gases  burned.  Coke  ovens, 
therefore,  whether  beehive  or  retort,  can  be  classified  as  non- 
recovery  ovens  and  by-product  recovery  ovens. 

Three  types  of  ovens  will  be  considered  as  illustrating 
three  of  the  above  classes.  The  fourth  class — the  by-product 
beehive  oven — is  not  very  important,  and  is  not  employed  in 
Canada. 

Non-recovery  Beehive  Oven. 

This  is  the  simplest  type  of  oven  in  common  use.  It  has  a 
circular  floor  and  domed  roof,  and  is  usually  built  of  brick  or 
stone  lined  with  firebrick.  The  ovens  are  built  back  to  back, 
in  long  rows,  with  the  object  of  economizing  heat  and  space. 
In  operation,  a  suitable  charge  of  coal  is  fed  into  the  oven  through 
a  hole  in  the  roof,  the  brickwork  of  the  oven  having  been  left 
hot  enough  by  the  preceding  charge  to  start  the  coking  of  the 
coal  and  ultimately  to  ignite  the  volatile  matter  driven  off. 
Air  is  cautiously  admitted  through  loose  brickwork  in  the  door 
in  front,  and  in  such  a  way  that  the  volatile  matter  escaping 
from  the  coal  is  burned  in  the  oven  over  the  charge,  and  the 
coal  and  the  coke  preserved,  as  far  as  possible,  from  oxidation. 
The  heat  generated  by  the  combustion  of  the  volatile  matter  is 
radiated  down  from  the  roof,  and  completes  the  coking  commenc- 
ed by  the  heat  from  the  brickwork,  and  the  whole  oven  is  raised 
to  a  red  heat.  When  the  coking  is  completed — usually  after 
about  72  hours — the  coke  is  drawn  out  and  quenched  with  water, 
and  a  fresh  charge  of  coal  is  introduced  into  the  oven.  In 


8 

most  beehive-oven  plants  the  coke  is  drawn  out  by  manual  labour, 
as  the  shape  of  the  oven  is  not  suitable  for  the  utilization  of 
mechanical  extractors.  Occasionally,  the  hot  waste  gases 
leaving  the  oven  are  carried  under  boilers,  and  used  to  generate 
steam,  but  otherwise,  coke  is  the  one  and  only  product  of  this 
type  of  oven. 

Some  beehive  ovens  have  been  so  constructed  as  to  allow 
of  the  recovery  of  by-products;  but  in  these,  the  simplicity  of 
the  ordinary  beehive  oven  is  lost,  without  gaining  the  advantages 
obtained  from  the  retort  oven. 

Non-recovery  Retort  Ovens. 

In  non-recovery  retort  ovens,  the  coal  is  coked  in  long, 
narrow  retorts  built  of  firebrick.  The  retorts  may  be  arranged 
either  horizontally  or  vertically,  in  batteries.  They  are  made 
slightly  wider  at  one  end  than  the  other,  to  allow  of  the  ready 
discharge  of  the  coke  from  the  oven  by  means  of  a  ram  or  by 
gravity.  Coal  is  charged  into  a  hot  oven,  as  in  the  case  of  the 
beehive  oven,  but  in  marked  contradistinction  to  the  latter, 
no  air  is  admitted  into  the  oven  itself.  The  volatile  products 
from  the  coal  leave  the  oven  through  special  ports,  are  then 
mixed  with  air,  and  burned  in  flues  surrounding  the  oven. 
The  heat  of  their  combustion  is  conducted  back  into  the  oven 
through  the  walls,  and  the  coking  of  the  coal  is  thus  completed. 
The  hot  gases  from  the  flues  are  often  used  to  generate  steam, 
but  otherwise  coke  is  again  the  one  and  only  product  of  this  type 
of  oven. 

By-product  Retort  Ovens. 

The  construction  and  operation  of  these  ovens  is  in  many 
ways  similar  to  that  of  the  non-recovery  retort  ovens,  indeed 
so  much  so  that  some  retort  ovens  can  be  operated  either  with 
or  without  by-product  recovery.  The  difference  consists  in 
the  fact  that,  with  the  recovery  ovens,  the  gases  and  other 
volatile  products  from  the  coal  are  led  away  through  pipes 
to  a  hydraulic  main,  and  thence  to  a  recovery  plant  where  they 


are  passed  through  condensers,  scrubbers,  etc. ;  and  in  this  way 
ammoniacal  liquor  and  coal  tar  are  obtained — as  in  a  coal-gas 
plant.  Enough  of  the  purified  gas  is  then  piped  back  to  the  battery 
and  burned  in  flues  surrounding  the  retorts  to  keep  the  ovens 
at  the  temperature  requisite  for  good  coking.  In  this  type  of 
oven,  regenerators  are  commonly  used  to  preheat  the  air  and  gas 
before  they  are  burned  in  the  flues.  The  resulting  economy  is 
such  that,  unless  the  coal  is  low  in  volatile  matter,  only  half 
the  purified  gas  is  required  to  heat  the  ovens,  while  the  remainder 
— a  valuable  by-product — can  be  used  for  other  purposes. 
In  this  connexion  it  might  be  pointed  out  that  the  superior 
economies  in  the  working  of  a  by-product  recovery  coke-oven 
plant,  as  compared  with  a  coal-gas  plant,  together  with  the  su- 
perior quality  of  the  coke  produced,  make  the  former  a  rival 
to  the  coal-gas  plant,  even  as  a  means  of  supplying  city  gas; 
but  the  substitution  is  possible  only  where  there  is  a  large  de- 
mand for  coke  of  high  quality. 

Types  of  Coke  Ovens  Compared. 

Until  recent  years  there  has  been  a  decided  prejudice  against 
retort  oven  coke;  the  product  of  beehive  ovens  has  been  more 
in  demand,  especially  for  use  in  blast  furnaces.  This  preference, 
however,  is  fortunately  disappearing.  As  a  matter  of  fact, 
retort  ovens  can  make  as  good  coke  as  beehive  ovens,  and  can 
make  more  of  it  from  ordinary  coking  coals.  They  have, 
moreover,  a  wider  range  of  adaptability  as  they  can  produce  a 
commercial  coke  from  certain  classes  of  coal  which  cannot 
be  coked  in  a  beehive  oven.  Hence  the  retort  oven  is  gradually 
displacing  the  beehive  oven,  and  in  some  countries  the  change 
is  almost  completed. 

Beehive  ovens,  as  a  rule,  are  a  nuisance  in  the  neighbourhood 
where  they  are  located,  they  burn  or  waste  all  the  gases  and 
volatile  matter  generated  from  the  coal,  and  they  give  no  return 
except  that  of  the  coke  produced.  Moreover,  they  also  burn 
about  10  per  cent  of  the  coke  itself.  In  other  words,  if,  with 
a  certain  coal,  a  75  per  cent  yield  of  coke  is  obtained  in  a  retort 
oven,  probably  only  65  per  cent  would  be  obtained  in  a  beehive 


10 

oven.  In  the  former  case  134  tons  of  coal  would  be  required 
to  produce  100  tons  of  coke;  whereas,  in  the  latter  case,  154 
tons  would  be  required.  That  is  to  say,  for  every  100  tons 
of  coke  produced  in  a  beehive  oven,  20  tons  of  coal,  approxi- 
mately, are  needlessly  wasted  through  the  burning  of  the  coke. 
From  the  ethical  point  of  view,  therefore,  there  can  be  no  hesi- 
tation in  condemning  the  beehive  oven ;  while  from  the  practical 
point  of  view  it  should  be  remembered  that,  in  addition  to  the 
smaller  yield,  the  greater  waste  of  carbon  in  the  beehive  oven 
results  in  a  higher  percentage  of  ash  in  the  coke  produced. 
The  beehive  oven  has  the  further  disadvantage  that  the  coking 
period  is  at  least  one  and  one-half  times  as  long  as  in  a  retort 
oven,  so  that,  if  the  charges  are  the  same,  it  takes  three  beehive 
ovens  to  do  the  work  of  two  retort  ovens.  The  cost  of  working 
a  beehive  oven  is  also  high,  as  the  method  of  drawing  the  coke 
by  manual  labour  is  slow  and  expensive.  The  beehive  oven  is, 
however,  very  low  in  first  cost,  and  being  simple  in  construction, 
is  also  easy  to  keep  in  repair.  These  facts,  together  with 
the  widespread  prejudice  in  its  favour,  and  the  great  number 
of  managers  and  men  familiar  with  its  use — but  unfamiliar 
with  retort-oven  practice — explain  the  reluctance  of  so  many 
coke  manufacturers  to  adopt  retort  ovens. 

It  is  probable  that  in  nearly  all  cases  the  non-recovery 
retort  oven  is,  in  the  long  run,  more  profitable  than  the  beehive 
oven,  and  that  it  would  certainly  prove  to  be  so  in  all  large 
plants.  The  capital  outlay  is  greater,  but  the  working  expenses 
are  less;  while  the  output  of  coke  is  at  least  10  per  cent  more 
for  the  same  amount  of  coal  used. 

In  Canada,  at  the  present  time,  the  profits  to  be  gained 
by  the  recovery  of  by-products  are  more  doubtful.  On  account 
of  the  high  capital  cost  of  a  by-product  plant,  it  is  essential 
that  there  should  be  a  reasonably  certainty  of  working  full 
time;  hence  it  is  usual  to  erect  large  central  plants,  where  they 
are  capable  of  drawing  supplies  from  several  collieries,  and 
where  a  good  market  for  the  products  is  of  easy  access.  Evidence 
given  before  a  Royal  Commission  on  Coal  Supplies  in  England 
would  appear  to  show  that,  there,  the  value  of  the  by-products 
will  not  only  pay  for  the  working  of  such  a  coke  plant,  and 


11 

provide  a  profit,  but  will  also  pay  for  the  capital  outlay  within 
ten  years.  Various  uses  for  coal  tar  are  given  later;  but  it 
seems  certain  that  by-product  recovery  coke-oven  plants  which 
produce  tar,  and  the  coal-tar  industry  which  uses  coal  tar  as 
a  raw  product,  must  grow  up  together. 

At  the  present  time,  there  are  only  two  by-product  recovery 
coke-oven  plants  operating  in  Canada;  yet  in  1913  these  two 
plants  were  responsible  for  two-thirds  of  the  total  coke  produc- 
tion of  the  Dominion.  As  coke  is  imported,  their  production, 
however,  only  amounted  to  half  the  total  consumption  of  coke 
in  the  Dominion.  We  may  confidently  expect  that  the  tendency 
of  the  future  will  be  towards  the  recovery  of  coal  tar  and  ammonia 
at  all  coke  and  gas  plants. 


CARBONIZATION  OF  PEAT,  LIGNITE,  ETC. 

Not  only  bituminous  coals,  but  wood,  peat,  lignite,  bitu- 
minous shales,  and  other  carbonaceous  substances  are  also 
carbonized  or  coked  on  a  commercial  scale,  and  in  such  a  manner 
as  to  yield  gas,  tar,  etc.  Bituminous  coals,  as  already  stated, 
yield  coke,  gas,  ammoniacal  liquor,  and  tar — the  tar  consisting 
mainly  of  aromatic  hydrocarbons.  Wood  yields  charcoal, 
tar,  an  aqueous  distillate,  and  gas;  the  tar  in  this  case  contains 
chiefly  phenolic  derivatives;  the  aqueous  distillate  contains 
acetic  acid,  and  is  acid  to  litmus;  while  the  gas  is  of  low  value. 
Tar  from  peat,  lignite,  or  bituminous  shales,  is  principally  com- 
posed of  aliphatic  hydrocarbons;  the  aqueous  distillate  yielding 
ammonia.  The  coke  residues  from  peat  and  lignite  have, 
as  yet,  found  little  commercial  use,  but  there  are  great  possi- 
bilities in  the  Canadian  West  for  a  practicable  method  of  car- 
bonizing lignite,  and  then  briquetting  the  carbonized  residue, 
or  in  some  other  way  converting  it  into  a  fuel  suitable  for  do- 
mestic and  general  purposes. 

The  by-products  from  bituminous  coals,  however,  are  at 
present  of  such  overwhelmingly  greater  commercial  importance 
than  the  others  mentioned  above,  that  only  the  former  are 
considered  in  this  bulletin. 


12 

PRODUCTION  OF  COKE,  GAS,  AMMONIA,  AND  TAR, 
IN  CANADA. 

No  official  statistics  are  available  to  show  the  weight  of 
coal  coked  annually  in  Canadian  gas  works,  and  the  correspond- 
ing yield  of  gas,  coke,  etc. ;  but  Mr.  A.  Hewitt,  General  Manager 
of  the  Consumers  Gas  Co.,  of  Toronto,  states  that  approximately 
five  million  gallons  of  tar  are  produced  annually.1 

Some  idea  of  the  relation  between  the  coal  coked  and  the 
products  obtained  at  modern  gas  works  can  be  obtained  from 
some  figures  published  in  the  Journal  of  Gas  Lighting.2  These 
show  that  the  average  "residuals"  obtained  during  1913  by  the 
three  London  (Eng.)  gas  companies,  per  long  ton  (2,240  Ibs.) 
of  coal  coked  were:  coke  12-47  cwt.,  coke  breeze  5-20  bushels, 
tar  10  gallons,  ammonia  liquor  36-11  "gallons  of  8  ozs.", 
and  gas  12,420  cubic  feet.  The  ammoniacal  liquor  referred 
to  is  of  such  a  strength  that  8  ounces  of  pure  sulphuric  acid  are 
required  to  neutralize  the  "volatile"3  ammonia  in  one  gallon 
of  the  liquid.  This  corresponds  to  0-674  pounds  of  ammonium 
sulphate  per  gallon;  but  the  actual  yield  obtained  is  not  stated. 
Although  the  above  are  called  residuals,  it  is  obvious  that  the 
weight  of  coke  stated  is  the  gross  yield,  rather  than  the  net 
weight  left  after  heating  the  retorts.  The  three  companies 
in  question  used  approximately  20-3  per  cent,  21-1  per  cent, 
and  12-3  per  cent,  respectively  (mean  18  per  cent)  of  the  coke 
produced,  to  heat  the  retorts.  Subtracting  18  per  cent  from 
the  above  coke  yield,  and  assuming  that  a  bushel  of  coke  breeze 
weighs  50  pounds,  then  the  net  yields  per  100  pounds  of  coal 
coked  are  approximately:  coke  60  pounds,  tar  0-45  gallons, 
gas  550  cubic  feet,  ammonium  sulphate  one  pound. 

Data  collected  by  the  Division  of  Mineral  Resources  and 
Statistics  of  the  Mines  Branch,  show  that,  in  1913,  2,147,913 
short  tons  (2,000  pounds)  of  coal  were  carbonized  in  Canadian 
coke  ovens,  and  1,517,133  tons  of  coke  produced  therefrom. 
Of  the  above,  1,456,361  tons  of  coal  were  coked  in  by-product 

1  The  publishers  of  the  Gas  Journal  of  Canada  are  now  collecting  gas  works  statistics 
for  1914,  and  hope  to  make  the  first  publication  of  them  by  January  1,  1915. 
1  February  24,  1914,  page  492. 
1  See  page  26. 


13 

recovery  coke  ovens,  with  the  production  of  1,018,632  tons 
of  coke;  8,371,600  gallons  of  tar;  10,663  tons  of  ammonium 
sulphate;  and  3,353,831,100  cubic  feet  of  surplus  gas.  The 
corresponding  yields  per  100  pounds  of  coal  are:  coke  70  pounds, 
tar  0-29  gallons,  gas  115  cubic  feet,  ammonium  sulphate  0-73 
pounds.  These  figures  are  not  comparable  with  those  from  the 
London  gas  companies,  as  no  analyses  of  the  coal  coked  are 
given  in  either  case. 

No  statistics  of  the  production  of  producer  gas  in  Canada 
are  available. 

Coke,  gas,  ammonia,  and  coal  tar  are — as  already  shown — 
the  main  products  or  by-products  obtained  from  the  distillation 
of  coal  in  gas  retorts,  or  in  coke  ovens.  These,  and  their 
derivatives,  will  now  be  considered  separately,  and  in  greater 
detail.  Benzene,  one  of  the  most  valuable  by-products  of  coal, 
will  be  considered  under  the  heading  of  coal  tar,  but  a  much 
richer  source  of  this  product  is  the  "crude  benzol"  directly  re- 
covered from  coke-oven  and  coal  gas  by  washing  with  heavy  oil 
or  by  other  means.  Formerly,  when  the  standard  of  coal  gas 
was  its  "candle  power,"  it  was  not  possible  to  remove  the 
benzol  from  this  gas,  but  now,  where,  as  in  Canada,  calorific 
value  has  been  introduced  as  the  standard,  the  gas  may  be 
scrubbed  and  the  gas  works  should  be  able  to  supply  a  largely 
increased  quantity  of  benzene.1 


1  On  page  11  it  was  pointed  out  that  by-product  plants  producing  tar  and  the  coal-tar 
industry  using  tar  must  grow  up  together.  In  Technical  Paper  89  of  the  Bureau  of  Mines 
Washington,  on  Coal-Tar  Products,  published  since  this  was  written,  H.  C.  Porter  points 
out  the  fact  that,  if  the  gas  at  present  produced  in  coke-oven  and  coal-gas  plants  were 
thoroughly  stripped  of  benzol,  the  increased  demand  for  benzene  and  its  homologues  caused 
by  the  war  could  be  met  at  once  to  a  considerable  extent .  This  would  remove  the  necessity 
of  waiting  several  years  for  the  establishment  of  new  by-product  recovery  plants,  or  for  the 
conversion  of  existing  plants  into  by-product  recovery  plants. 


15 


PART  II. 

PROPERTIES  AND  USES  OF  COAL  PRODUCTS 
AND  BY-PRODUCTS. 

COKE. 

^Coke  is  the  name  given  to  the  solid  residue  left  by  the  de- 
structive distillation  of  coal,  or  of  some  other  carbonaceous 
substances.  It_consists  mainly  of  carbon,  together  with  the  origi- 
nal ash  of  the  coal,  but  always  contains  small  amounts  of  volatile 
matter  which  the  temperature  attained  in  the  coking  process 
has  failed  to  drive  out  during  the  time  the  heat  was  maintained. 

When  coal  is  strongly  heated  in  absence  of  air,  it  is  decom- 
posed, and  loses  water,  gases,  and  volatile  compounds.  Many 
coals  so  heated  first  fuse  or  soften,  and  then  harden  as  de- 
composition progresses,  ultimately  leaving  a  strong  coke.  This 
coke,  although  quite  hard,  is  light  and  cellular,  owing  to  the  bub- 
bles produced  by  the  escaping  gases  while  the  mass  is  soft. 
Neither  anthracite  nor  lignite  coalesces  when  heated,  hence 
neither  is  capable  of  making  commercial  coke.  The  fragments 
left  after  the  heating  might  strictly  be  described  as  coke,  but 
they  are  approximately  the  same  size  and  shape  as  the  original 
pieces  of  coal,  and  bear  little  or  no  resemblance  to  the  hard  porous 
substance  commercially  known  as  coke.  Some  bituminous 
coals  also  fail  to  coke,  or  else  make  so  weak  or  impure  a  material 
as  to  be  worthless. 

Coke  bears  the  same  relation  to  coal  that  charcoal  does 
to  wood.  For  many  purposes,  such  as  blast  furnace  smelting, 
coke  is  so  far  superior  to  coal  as  a  fuel,  that  it  is  necessary  to 
go  to  the  trouble  and  expense  of  coking  the  coal  before  use. 
The  chief  advantages  of  coke  as  a  fuel  are: — 

(1)  It  is  strong  and  hard,  and  does  not  crumble  or  soften 
when  burning;  thus  it  can  support  a  heavy  charge  of  ore, 
etc.,  in  a  furnace,  without  crushing  or  melting  dcwn  and  ob- 
structing the  blast. 


16 

(2)  It  burns  without  producing  tar  or  smoke. 

(3)  It  has  a  high  calorific  intensity;  that  is  to  say,  a  higher 
temperature  can  be  obtained  by  burning  coke  than  by  burning 
coal,    although  a  given  weight  of  coal  will  naturally  evolve  a 
larger  quantity  of  heat  than  will  the  coke  produced  from  it. 

Coke  is  the  main  product  of  coke-oven  plants,  and  is  a 
by-product  of  gas  plants.  A  coke  manufacturer  selects  coal 
that  is  capable  of  giving  good  coke,  and  treats  it  in  such  a  way — 
with  regard  to  the  mass  coked,  temperature  of  oven,  and  dura- 
tion of  coking — as  will  produce  a  good  quality  of  coke.  The 
gas  manufacturer  naturally  regards  the  quantity  and  quality 
of  gas  produced  as  his  chief  consideration,  the  quality  of  coke 
being  only  of  secondary  importance;  his  choices  of  coal,  etc., 
are,  therefore,  all  made  from  the  view  point  of  gas  production. 
Consequently  gas  or  retort  coke  is  practically  always  inferior 
to  oven  coke,  as  regards  hardness,  strength,  lustre,  etc.;  but 
the  former  has  advantages  over  oven  coke  for  certain  purposes, 
since  it  contains  more  volatile  matter,  and  consequently  burns 
more  readily. 

Table  I  gives  analyses  of  a  coal,  and  of  a  coke  produced 
from  it.  The  coal  sample  came  from  the  Foord  seam,  Allan 
Shaft  Colliery,  Pictou  County,  N.S.  and  the  coke  was  made 
in  an  Otto  Hoffman,  by-product  recovery,  retort  oven  at  Sydney, 
N.S.  This  coke  was  a  high  grade  metallurgical  coke,  and  one 
of  the  best  produced  in  the  long  series  of  coking  tests  carried 
out  in  connexion  with  the  "Investigation  of  the  Coals  of  Can- 
ada," Mines  Branch  Report  No.  83,  Vol.  I. 


17 

TABLE  I. 

Analysis  of  Coal,  and  Coke  Produced  therefrom. 


Coal. 


Coke. 


Proximate  analysis  of  dry  coal  or  coke 

Fixed  carbon % 

Volatile  matter % 

Ash % 

Ultimate  analysis  of  dry  coal  or  coke 

Carbon % 

Hydrogen % 

Sulphur % 

Nitrogen % 

Oxygen % 

Ash % 

Duration  of  coking Hours 

Yield  of  dry  coke  from  dry  coal % 

Apparent  specific  gravity 

Real  specific  gravity 

Percentage  cell  space  or  porosity 


57-1 

33-7 
9-2 

77-8 
5-0 
0-6 
2-2 
5-2 
9-2 


87-3 
0-6 
12-1 


48 

71-9 
0-92 
1-86 
50-7 


Uses  of  Coke. 

The  most  important  uses  of  coke  are  in  metallurgical 
operations,  such  as  the  smelting  of  iron  in  blast  furnaces;  the 
remelting  of  iron  in  the  iron  foundry;  and  the  smelting  of 
copper,  lead,  nickel,  silver,  etc.  Oven  coke  is  always  used  for 
these  purposes,  as  a  strong,  hard  coke  is  required.  For  blast 
furnaces,  great  compressive  strength  is  essential;  but  for  copper 
smelters,  porosity  is  important.  During  1913,  1,417,148  tons 
of  coke  were  used  in  the  blast  furnaces  of  Canada ;  this  amounted 
to  about  65  per  cent  of  the  total  consumption  of  metallurgical 
coke  in  the  Dominion. 

Gas  coke  is  chiefly  used  for  steam  raising,  domestic  heating, 
etc.  It  has  the  great  advantage  over  soft  coal  that  it  can  be 
burned  in  an  ordinary  grate  without  producing  smoke  and  soot; 
this  is  a  matter  of  great  importance  for  the  cleanliness  of  our 
cities  even  now,  and  will  become  more  so  as  the  cities  increase 


18 

in  size.  Where  hard  coal  is  burned,  nothing  is  gained  as  regards 
smoke  reduction  by  a  change  to  coke;  there  is,  however,  a  great 
deal  to  be  said  in  favour  of  coking  all  bituminous  coal  that  will 
form  a  commercial  coke,  thus  obtaining  the  two  clean  fuels 
coke  and  gas,  and  recovering  the  valuable  by-products  tar 
and  ammonia. 

Gas  coke  can  prove  satisfactory  for  steam  raising  only  where 
it  is  burned  under  suitable  conditions.  It  has  a  comparatively 
high  temperature  of  ignition — although  not  so  high  as  that  of 
oven  coke — and  requires  a  good  draught.  It  gives  a  more 
localized  heat  than  coal,  on  account  of  the  absence  of  flame, 
and  when  burning  freely  gives  a  more  intense  heat ;  it  is  therefore 
liable  to  cause  troubles  such  as  the  burning  of  the  firebars  and 
the  formation  of  clinker.  The  latter  trouble  is  accentuated 
by  the  fact  that  coke  naturally  contains  a  higher  percentage 
of  ash  than  the  coal  from  which  it  is  made.  The  difficulties 
attending  its  use  are,  however,  not  unsurmountable,  as  is  shown 
by  its  successful  use  in  many  plants.  A  suitable  furnace  should 
be  employed,  and  the  method  of  stoking  adapted  to  the  fuel. 
Crushing  the  coke  to  a  small  uniform  size  is  generally  advan- 
tageous. Troubles  due  to  ash  and  clinker  would  be  reduced 
if  the  coal  for  use  in  gas  plants  were  first  washed,  as  is  frequently 
done  with  coal  for  coke-oven  plants.  Washing  the  coal  would 
also  reduce  the  sulphur  in  the  resulting  coke. 

Coke  is  also  used  in  gas  producers.  Many  of  the  small 
suction  gas  plants  are  designed  to  operate  either  on  anthracite 
or  on  coke. 

Gas  coke  is  a*  good  fuel  for  domestic  heating  when  burned 
in  a  suitable  furnace;  but  before  the  prejudice  against  it  can  be 
removed  it  will  have  to  be  realized  that  a  proper  design  of  furnace 
must  be  employed. 

In  England,  houses  are  generally  heated  with  open  grate 
fires,  in  which  soft  coal  is  burned,  and  although  the  open  fire 
has  many  advantages  in  a  temperate  climate  over  other  methods 
of  heating,  such  use  of  soft  coal  is  wasteful  of  fuel  and  plays  a 
large  part  in  the  pollution  of  the  atmosphere.  These  conditions 
have  recently  led  to  the  introduction  of  a  low  temperature  coke; 
the  coal  is  coked  in  gas  retorts  maintained  at  a  much  lower 


19 

temperature  than  is  usually  employed,  whereby  only  about 
two  thirds  of  the  volatile  matter  is  removed.  This  type  of 
coke,  of  which  "Coalite"  is  the  best  known  example,  ignites 
at  a  much  lower  temperature  than  ordinary  coke  and  burns 
more  readily,  thus  giving  a  bright,  cheerful,  smokeless  fire. 
The  commercial  development  of  such  smokeless  fuel  in  England 
has  been  slow,  both  on  account  of  prejudice  and  of  the  difficulty 
of  making  a  wholly  satisfactory  and  uniform  product.  In 
Canada  the  need  for  such  a  fuel  is  far  less,  but  even  here  con- 
ditions might  easily  arise  where  low  temperature  carbonization 
would  prove  advantageous.  Low  temperature  carbonization 
produces  a  greater  yield  of  solid  fuel  in  proportion  to  the  gas 
than  is  yielded  in  ordinary  practice;  it  should  therefore  be 
advantageous  in  a  place  where,  possibly  on  account  of  the  scarcity 
of  hard  coal  or  the  competition  of  natural  gas,  there  is  a  com- 
paratively larger  market  for  a  solid,  furnace  fuel  than  for  city 
gas.  Not  only  the  proportionate  yield,  but  also  the  actual 
yield  of  coke  is  increased  by  low  temperate  coking;  the  yields 
of  gas  and  tar  are  correspondingly  lower.  The  gas  produced  is, 
however,  richer,  and  the  tar  more  valuable  than  those  obtained 
by  the  usual  methods. 

Recovery  coke  oven  practice  also  yields  a  proportionately 
larger  supply  of  solid  as  compared  with  gaseous  fuel  than  is  the 
case  with  ordinary  gas  works  practice ;  because  at  the  coke  ovens, 
gas  is  used  to  supply  the  heat  for  coking,  whilst  at  the  gas  works 
coke  is  used  for  this  purpose.  It  has  already  been  pointed 
out  that  modern  by-product  recovery  coke  plants  have  recently 
been  installed  in  certain  places  as  a  means  of  supplying  city 
gas;  but  such  installations  are  only  possible  where  there  is  a 
good  demand  for  metallurgical  coke.  A  study  of  the  statistics 
of  coke  suggests  that,  in  some  Canadian  cities,  a  coke-oven 
plant  might  possibly  prove  more  profitable  than  a  gas  plant. 
During  1913  the  coke  imports  exceeded  the  exports  by  655,671 
tons,  an  amount  greater  than  the  coke  production  of  either 
of  the  two  by-product  coke-oven  plants,  during  that  year. 

In  1913,  1,517,133  short  tons  of  oven  coke  were  produced  in 
Canada;  and  1,530,499  tons  were  sold  or  used  by  the  producers. 


20 

Exports   amounted    to   68,235    tons,   and   imports   to    723,906 
tons.1 

GAS. 

The  three  principal  gases  which  have  been  mentioned  are 
city  gas,  cpke-oven  gas,  and  producer  gas.  It  has  been  explained 
that  city  gas  is  frequently  a  mixture  of  ordinary  coal  gas  with  a 
carburetted  water  gas,  oil  being  used  for  carburetting;  some 
Canadian  cities,  however,  are  supplied  with  coal  gas  alone, 
and  others  with  carburetted  water  gas  alone. 

Gases  vary  so  widely  in  composition  with  the  conditions 
under  which  they  are  made,  that  it  is  difficult  to  give  strictly 
typical  analyses;  Table  II,  however,  gives  an  indication  of  the 
types  of  gas  which  go  to  make  up  the  ordinary  mixed  city  gas.2 
Table  III  gives  actual  analyses  of  a  city  gas,  a  coke-oven  gas, 
three  types  of  producer  gas,  and,  for  comparison,  a  natural  gas. 
The  calorific  values  are  in  British  Thermal  Units  per  cubic 
foot  of  gas  measured  moist  at  60°F.,  under  a  pressure  of  30 
inches  of  mercury.  They  have  been  calculated  as  in  Report 
No.  83,  of  the  Mines  Branch,  "An  Investigation  of  the  Coals 
of  Canada,"  Vol.  II,  p.  168.  The  assumption  is  made  that  the 
saturated  hydrocarbons  are  all  methane,  and  the  unsaturated 
hydrocarbons  ethylene.  This  assumption  probably  causes  no 
appreciable  error  in  the  calculated  calorific  value  for  a  producer 
gas;  but  it  is  liable  to  cause  a  serious  error  in  the  case  of  a  city 
gas,  and  an  even  greater  error  when  applied  to  an  oil  gas.  De- 
terminations made  with  a  Boys  gas  calorimeter  showed  that 
the  actual  gross  calorific  value  of  the  city  gas  given  in  the  table 
was  636  B.  Th.  U.,  and  of  the  natural  gas,  930  B.  Th.  U. 


1  Preliminary  Report  on  the  Mineral  Production  of  Canada  during  1913,  by  John  McLeish, 
Mines  Branch  Bulletin  No.  283. 

*  The  oil  gas  shown  is  of  the  Pintsch  gas  type  as  In  the  carburetting  process  the  oil  gas 
never  exist*  alone  and  cannot  be  analysed. 


21 
TABLE  II. 

Typical  Gas  Analyses. 


Retort 

Carbur- 

coal 

Water 

Oil 

etted 

gas. 

gas. 

gas. 

water 

gas. 

Hydrogen              .                                 % 

50 

50 

30 

36 

Saturated  hydrocarbons  % 

34 

1 

38 

14 

Unsaturated  hydrocarbons  % 

4 

25 

9 

Carbon  monoxide  % 

8 

40 

— 

30 

Carbon  dioxide  % 

2 

5 

— 

5 

Oxygen                                                   % 

Nitrogen        ...                                     % 

2 

4 

7 

6 

Inflammable  gases  % 

96 

91 

93 

89 

Calculated  calorific  value,  gross  B.Th.U. 

590 

300 

880 

500 

Calculated  calorific  value.net  B.Th.U. 

530 

270 

810 

450 

22 
TABLE  III. 

Examples  of  Gas  Analyses. 


Coke- 

Producer  gas. 

City 

oven 

Natural 

gas. 

gas. 

Coal. 

Lignite. 

Peat. 

gas. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

Hydrogen  % 

39-5 

48-5 

12-5 

19-0 

10-3 

— 

Saturated  hydro- 

carbons    % 

31-8 

32-8 

3-3 

1-5 

2-4 

91-6 

Unsaturated  hy- 

drocarbons   

5-1 

3-6 

0-2 

0-1 

0-4 

— 

Carbon  mon- 

oxide                 % 

14-6 

5-5 

10-7 

16-1 

20-2 



Carbon   dioxide.  % 

1-7 

2-4 

10-1 

11-7 

9-9 

— 

Oxygen  % 

0-6 

0-3 

0-8 

0-7 

0-3 

0-2 

Nitrogen  (by  dif- 

ference)    % 

6-7 

6-9 

62-4 

50-9 

56-5 

8-2 

Inflammable 

gases  % 

91-0 

90-4 

26-7 

36-7 

33-3 

91-6 

Calorific  value 

by  calculation, 

gross  B.Th.U. 

574 

560 

111 

129 

128 

916 

by  calculation, 

net  B.Th.U.. 

516 

500 

101 

118 

120 

822 

No.  1.  Montreal  city  gas,  which  is  coal  gas  mixed  with  carburetted  water 
gas. 

*  2.  Coke-oven  gas  from  Nova  Scotia  coal  coked  in  Otto  Hoffman  oven. 
"     3.  Nova  Scotia  coal  in  McGill  gas  producer. 

*  4.  Alberta  lignite  in  Westinghouse  gas  producer. 
"     5.  Ontario  peat  in  Korting  gas  producer. 

6.  A  natural  gas  from  Alberta. 

When  coal  is  distilled  at  low  temperatures,  the  primary 
products  of  decomposition  are  principally  water  vapour,  oxides 
of  carbon,  and  hydrocarbons.  As  the  temperature  increases, 
the  hydrocarbons  break  down  and  hydrogen  is  produced, 


23 

more  volatile  matter  is  also  driven  off  from  the  coke,  and  the 
lighter  constituents  of  the  tar  are  converted  into  gas.  The 
yield  of  gas  is  thus  materially  increased,  but  at  the  expense 
of  the  rich  hydrocarbons  in  the  gas  and  the  more  valuable 
constituents  of  the  tar.  The  tendency  of  gas  works  managers 
is  to  increase  the  yield  of  gas  by  increasing  the  temperature 
of  the  retorts;  but  from  the  standpoint  of  conservation  it  would 
be  better  to  distil  the  coal  at  lower  temperatures,  and  then 
dilute  the  resulting  gases  with  a  cheaper  product,  such  as  water 
gas. 

The  production  of  city  gas  in  Canada  is  largely  reduced 
by  the  competition  of  natural  gas.  There  are  at  present  some 
thirty  nine  companies  supplying  city  gas,  the  net  prices  charged 
per  thousand  cubic  feet  for  illuminating  purposes  ranging  from 
$0 . 70  to  $2  . 40.  Twenty-three  companies  are  employed  in 
the  distribution  of  natural  gas,  the  corresponding  prices  ranging 
from  $0.15  to  $0.70.  The  production  of  natural  gas  in  Canada 
in  1913  was,  approximately,  20,345  million  cubic  feet. 

In  many  countries  gas  companies  are  compelled  to  supply 
gas  of  a  certain  minimum  quality.  In  the  days  when  gas  was 
chiefly  burned  in  open  flat-flame  burners  for  illuminating  purposes, 
a  gas  of  a  certain  candle  power  was  insisted  on;  with  the  intro- 
duction of  incandescent  mantles  for  gas  lighting,  the  heating 
power  of  the  gas  became  more  important,  and  a  dual  standard 
was  created  in  certain  places.  Now  that  city  gas  is  used  almost 
entirely  for  cooking,  domestic  heating,  lighting  with  incandescent 
mantles,  and  power  production,  the  candle  power  of  the  gas 
when  burned  in  the  open  flame  is  of  no  importance,  and  the 
calorific  value,  or  heating  power  of  the  gas  is  of  vital  importance. 
This  change  is  to  the  advantage  of  both  producer  and  consumer, 
as  it  allows  the  gas  manufacturer  to  supply  a  satisfactory 
gas  at  a  lower  cost  than  was  possible  when  the  gas  had  to  be  rich 
in  illuminants. 

The  output  of  surplus  coke-oven  gas  in  Canada  in  1913 
amounted  to  3,354  million  cubic  feet.  This  gas  is  at  present 
used  in  the  steel  works,  to  which  the  coke-oven  plants  are  an 
adjunct,  for  heating  furnaces,  roasting  limestone,  etc.  As 
already  stated  in  connexion  with  coke  production,  one  possible 


24 

development  in  this  country  is  a  by-product  recovery  coke- 
oven  plant  to  supply  oven  gas  for  city  use,  and  also  to  produce 
metallurgical  coke,  tar,  and  ammonia. 

No  figures  are  available  for  the  annual  output  of  producer 
gas  in  Canada.  As  can  be  seen  from  the  analyses  given  in  Table 
III,  producer  gas  is  a  low  grade  fuel,  but  it  is  correspondingly 
low  in  cost  of  production,  and  is  used  to  a  great  extent  for  heating 
steel  furnaces,  and  in  other  metallurgical  processes;  also  for  power 
production  in  internal  combustion  engines.  In  many  works 
where  producer  gas  is  used  for  heating  large  furnaces,  the  gas 
is  taken  hot  from  the  producers  and  led  to  the  furnaces  without 
cooling.  A  gas  containing  tar  is  actually  better  than  a  clean 
gas  in  such  cases,  as  the  tar  vapour  notably  increases  the  calorific 
value  of  the  gas;  producers  of  the  updraft  type  are,  therefore, 
employed  at  such  works,  because  they  generate  from  bituminous 
coal,  a  gas  rich  in  tar,  and  are  moreover  simple  in  construc- 
tion and  operation.  Where  the  gas  has  to  be  cooled  and  led 
through  pipes,  and  where  it  is  to  be  used  for  internal  combustion 
engines,  a  tar-free  gas  must  be  obtained.  This  is  accomplished 
by  the  use  of  anthracite  or  coke  in  a  simple  producer,  or,  where 
a  fuel  richer  in  volatile  matter  is  employed,  by  means  of  specially 
designed  producers,  usually  of  the  down-draft,  or  the  double- 
zone  type,  and  by  means  of  tar  extractors. 

Uses  of  Gas. 

Gas  is  used  for  illumination,  in  which  case  it  is  usually 
burned  inside  incandescent  mantles;  for  heating  and  cooking; 
for  power  generation  in  internal  combustion  engines;  for  heating 
small  technical  appliances;  and  for  heating  all  kinds  of  large 
furnaces,  as  for  example  in  the  iron  and  steel  industries,  and  in 
the  manufacture  of  cement,  glass,  china,  etc. 

A  great  economy  was  effected  in  gas  illumination  when  the 
incandescent  mantle  replaced  the  flat-flame  burner ;  a  still  further 
economy  can  be  attained  by  the  use  of  high-pressure  gas.  High- 
pressure  gas  is  particularly  suited  to  street  and  factory  lighting; 
and  for  this  purpose  it  is  displacing  electricity  in  several  of  the 
largest  European  cities. 


25 

High  pressure  gas  is  also  used  for  generating  high  temper- 
atures in  furnaces.  The  greatest  advance  made  in  the  use  of 
gas  for  furnace  work,  however,  was  due  to  the  introduction  of 
recuperators  and  regenerators.  In  these,  the  waste  heat  from 
the  gases  leaving  the  furnace  is  used  to  pre-heat  the  air,  or  the  gas 
and  air  entering  the  furnace,  thus  enabling  a  high  temperature 
to  be  readily  obtained.  The  high  efficiency  obtainable  by  gas 
heating  with  the  regenerative  system,  together  with  the  greater 
ease  of  control  with  gaseous  than  with  solid  fuel,  and  the  greater 
cleanliness  of  the  former,  has  led  to  the  almost  entire  disuse  of 
solid  fuel  in  many  large  industries. 

The  last  few  years  have  seen  the  commercial  introduction 
of  a  flameless  method  of  burning  gases,  known  as  surface  com- 
bustion. In  many  cases  this  has  been  shown  to  result  in  greatly 
increased  efficiency;  hence  in  the  next  few  years,  considerable 
developments  may  be  expected  along  these  lines. 

AMMONIA. 

Ammonia  is  obtained  as  a  by-product  in  the  distillation  of 
coal  in  gas  works,  in  coke-oven  plants,  and  in  producer-gas  plants. 
The  quantity  depends  on  the  percentage  of  nitrogen  present  in 
the  coal;  but  other  factors,  e.g.  the  temperature  and  shape  of  the 
retorts,  ovens,  or  producers,  have  also  an  influence  on  the  fraction 
of  the  nitrogen  which  is  evolved  as  ammonia.  Generally, 
nitrogen  is  present  in  coals  to  the  extent  of  one  or  two  per  cent, 
but  in  gas  works  only  about  14  per  cent  of  this  is  recovered  as 
ammonia  in  the  gas;  this  latter  percentage  may  be  sensibly 
increased  by  adding  lime  to  the  coal,  or  by  passing  steam  through 
the  retort  during  distillation.  Increasing  the  steam  used 
also  increases  the  ammonia  yield  from  gas  producers.  The 
Mond  producers  are  run  so  that  a  very  high  yield  of  ammonia, 
amounting  to  about  60  per  cent  of  the  nitrogen  of  the  coal, 
is  obtained  by  means  of  the  large  excess  of  steam  which  is  passed 
through  the  fuel  bed ;  the  steam  favours  the  increased  percentage 
of  ammonia  by  lowering  the  temperature  of  the  producer  below 
the  point  at  which  ammonia  decomposes,  and  also  by  acting  as 
a  diluent  to  the  gases  evolved. 


26 

In  gas  and  coke-oven  plants  some  of  the  ammonia  is  washed 
out  from  the  gas  in  the  hydraulic  main,  purifiers,  etc.,  but  the 
bulk  of  it  is  recovered  from  washers  and  scrubbers  installed 
for  the  purpose.  As  small  a  volume  of  wash  liquor  as  possible 
is  used  in  these  washers,  to  prevent  undue  dilution  of  the  am- 
monia in  the  resulting  ammoniacal  liquor. 

Coal  gas  and  coke-oven  gas  contain  ammonia,  carbon 
dioxide,  sulphuretted  hydrogen,  cyanides,  etc.  As  these  gases 
combine  chemically  and  dissolve  in  water,  the  ammoniacal 
liquor  obtained  is  a  complicated  solution  containing  the  following 
ammonium  salts:  acid  and  neutral  carbonates,  acid  and  neutral 
sulphides,  thiocarbonate,  cyanide,  thiocyanate,  ferrocyanide, 
sulphate,  thiosulphate,  sulphite,  chloride,  and  acetate.  Because 
solutions  of  the  carbonates,  sulphides,  cyanide,  and  acetate 
readily  give  up  their  ammonia  when  boiled  the  ammonia  in 
these  salts  is  called  "volatile."  The  other  compounds  require 
the  addition  of  lime  to  liberate  the  ammonia,  which  in  these 
salts  is  said  to  be  "fixed."  The  ratio  between  the  "volatile" 
and  "fixed"  ammonia  in  gas  liquors  varies  widely,  but  that 
liquor  with  the  largest  proportion  of  "volatile",  is  naturally 
the  most  valuable.  In  producer-gas  plants  the  gas  is  washed 
in  towers  by  dilute  sulphuric  acid,  and  ammonium  sulphate 
is  directly  produced. 

The  ammoniacal  liquor  obtained  as  above  is  distilled  before 
and  after  the  addition  of  lime,  and  the  ammonia  liberated  is 
passed  into  sulphuric  acid  yielding  ammonium  sulphate,  or  into 
water  yielding  the  ammonia  solution  generally  known  as  am- 
monia, ammonium  hydroxide,  ammonia  water,  etc.  This 
treatment  of  the  gas  liquor  is  not  profitable  in  smaller  plants, 
and  from  such  places  the  liquor  is  generally  shipped  to  central 
plants  for  distillation. 

Uses  of  Ammonia. 

A  strong  solution  containing  about  10  per  cent  ammonia, 
as  obtained  by  simple  distillation,  is  largely  used  for  the  manu- 
facture of  ammonia  soda,  and  for  cleaning  purposes;  while  the 
more  concentrated  solution  "liquor  ammoniae",  and  anhydrous 


27 

liquid  ammonia,  are  used  in  refrigerating  machinery.  Am- 
monium nitrate,  which  is  usually  made  from  ammonium  sulphate 
and  sodium  nitrate,  is  being  increasingly  used  in  explosives. 
Ammonium  chloride,  which  is  produced  directly  from  the  gas 
liquor,  or  from  ammonium  sulphate  by  boiling  with  common 
salt,  or  obtained  from  waste  liquors  of  ammonia-soda  works, 
is  used  for  soldering,  for  galvanizing  iron,  for  calico  printing, 
and  for  Leclanch6  cells  and  dry  batteries.  A  process  by  which 
ammonia  is  converted  into  nitric  acid  has  recently  been  patented 
by  Ostwald,  and  will  probably  prove  to  be  a  very  important 
application  of  ammonia.  Ammonium  sulphate  is  the  most 
important  salt  of  ammonia;  its  possible  useful  application  as 
a  fertilizer  is  practically  unlimited.  As  yet  the  need  of  fertilizers 
has  not  been  felt  so  keenly  in  Canada  as  in  older  established 
countries,  but  its  use  here  is  bound  to  extend  rapidly.  During 
the  last  year  there  has  been  a  tendency  for  the  price  of  ammonium 
sulphate  to  drop,  partly  owing  to  the  competition  of  other  fer- 
tilizers now  produced  on  a  large  scale  by  the  fixation  of  atmos- 
pheric nitrogen  by  electrothermic  processes,  and  partly  owing 
to  the  progress  which  is  being  made  with  Haber's  synthetic 
process  for  ammonia  production.  The  war  has  caused  a  brisk 
demand  for  nitrates  in  the  manufacture  of  explosives,  and  the 
removal  of  these  nitrates  from  the  fertilizer  market,  should 
bring  about  an  increase  in  the  price  of  ammonium  sulphate. 

CYANIDES. 

In  the  dry  distillation  of  coal,  up  to  2  per  cent  of  the  nitrogen 
of  the  coal  is  evolved  in  the  form  of  cyanide,  and  is  recovered 
both  in  the  washers  and  scrubbers  along  with  the  ammonia, 
and  in  the  purifiers  where  ferrocyanide  is  formed  with  the 
ferric  oxide.  The  potassium  cyanide,  ferrocyanide,  and  ferri- 
cyanide,  which  are  worked  up  from  cyanogen  compounds  of  the 
gas,  are  very  important  by-products  of  the  gas  industry.  In  the 
twelve  months  ending  March,  1914,  Canada  imported  1,615,490 
pounds  of  potassium  and  sodium  cyanides,  and  166,901  pounds 
of  yellow  and  red  prussiate  of  potash  (potassium  ferro-  and 
ierricyanide).  The  simple  cyanides  have  a  wide  application 


28 


in  mining  operations;  the  yellow  prussiate  is  used  for  making 
potassium  cyanide,  for  dyeing,  and  for  case  hardening  steel ; 
and  the  red  prussiate  is  much  used  in  photography. 


COAL  TAR. 

The  composition  of  tars  varies  enormously  with  the  appa- 
ratus employed,  the  coal  used,  the  method  of  working,  etc. 
Lunge  quotes  the  two  following  sets  of  values  for  gas-works 
tar,  which  may  be  taken  as  typical.  These  tars  were  made 
from  the  same  coal  in  the  same  works;  but  in  the  one  case  the 
coal  was  coked  in  a  horizontal  retort,  and  in  the  other  in  a  ver- 
tical retort. 


Analysis  of  Gas-Works  Tar. 


Vertical. 

Horizontal. 

Specific  gravity  about 

1-1 

1-2 

Free  carbon  .                             

2-4% 

20-0% 

Distillation  yields:  — 
Water 

2-2% 

3-5% 

Light  oil  

5-9% 

3-1% 

Middle  oil 

12-3% 

7-7% 

Heavy  oil  .      .  .             

12-0% 

10-2% 

Anthracene  oil  

16-0% 

11-6% 

Pitch  

49-7% 

62-0% 

Coke-oven  tar  usually  contains  less  free  carbon  than  ordi- 
nary tar  and  is  therefore  more  mobile.  Its  specific  gravity  is 
from  1-14  to  1-19,  and  when  distilled  it  yields  on  an  average 
the  following  products: — 


29 
Analysis  of  Coke-Oven  Tar. 

Water 2-7% 

Light  oil 1-4% 

Middle  oil 3-5% 

Heavy  oil 9-9% 

Anthracene  oil 24-8% 

Pitch 56-4% 

Tar  from  gas  producers  differs  from  the  above  in  that  it 
contains  considerable  quantities  of  water.  A  sample  of  gas  pro- 
ducer tar  gave  the  following  distillates: — 

Analysis  of  Gas-Producer  Tar. 

Below  230°C 5 -4%  by  volume. 

230°C— 300°C 10-1%      " 

From  300°  until  oil  solidified 14-3%       " 

Oils  solidifying  on  cooling 10-4% 

Coke 30- 5%  by  weight. 

Water  and  loss 32-6%       « 

Water-Gas  Tar. 

A  tar  commonly  found  in  gas  works  is  water-gas  tar.  This 
is  not  actually  a  product  of  coal,  but  is  produced  by  the  cracking 
of  the  oil  used  for  carburetting  the  water  gas.  It  is  thinner 
than  ordinary  tar,  is  usually  brown  in  colour,  and  contains 
much  water.  The  amounts  of  free  carbon  and  of  phenols  in 
this  tar  are  minute,  and  the  higher  boiling  oils  produced  from 
it  contain  only  small  quantities  of  naphthalene  and  anthracene. 

Uses  of  Tar. 

Probably  the  greater  part  of  the  world's  production  of  tar 
is  distilled  in  order  to  obtain  the  more  valuable  products 
described  later;  but  there  are  many  uses  for  entirely  raw 
tar,  or  for  tar  in  its  dehydrated  state  (i.e.  after  it  has  been  heated 
in  closed  vessels  to  remove  the  water,  and,  incidentally,  to  re- 


30 

cover  the  benzol).  Dehydrated  tar  finds  wide  application  in 
the  preparation  of  roofing  felt,  and  for  preserving  timber,  stone, 
iron,  etc.  Tar  has,  weight  for  weight,  a  slightly  higher  heating 
value  than  coke,  and  is  now  being  used  as  a  fuel.  Formerly  it 
was  simply  poured  on  to  solid  fuel,  but  under  these  conditions 
combustion  was  by  no  means  complete;  now  the  tar  is  usually 
injected  in  the  form  of  a  fine  spray  by  means  of  steam  or  air 
and  so  comes  in  intimate  contact  with  the  air,  this  resulting  in 
complete  combustion.  Tar  is  sometimes  simply  mixed  with 
coke  for  heating  retorts  in  a  gas  plant  or  used  in  conjunction 
with  coke-oven  gas  for  heating  coke  ovens.  It  is  also  converted 
into  a  gas  by  being  passed  through  red-hot  tubes. 

There  are  so  many  valuable  products  which  may  be  obtained 
from  tar  that  its  use  as  a  fuel  is,  from  the  standpoint  of  conser- 
vation, to  be  condemned ;  but  it  must  be  admitted  that  in  very 
many  cases  the  tar  has  to  be  used  in  this  way.  Large  gas 
and  coke-oven  plants  can  profitably  have  a  tar-distilling  plant 
in  addition;  but  the  distillation  of  tar  in  small  works  is  not 
remunerative.  In  the  latter  case,  the  tar  may  be  shipped  to 
central  distilling  plants,  but  even  this  procedure  is  not  com- 
mercially possible  where  the  gas  or  coke-oven  plant  is  isolated, 
and  consequently  the  cost  of  transportation  high.  In  such 
cases  the  use  of  tar  for  fuel  is  the  only  possible  one. 

Distillation  of  Tar. 

Coal  tar  is  distilled  in  wrought  iron  stills.  These  stills 
are  usually  upright  cylinders  of  10  to  20  tons  capacity,  some- 
times heated  by  steam,  but  more  often  by  a  direct  fire.  As 
water  in  tar  sometimes  causes  bumping  in  the  stills,  it  is  removed 
as  completely  as  possible  beforehand.  With  thinner  tars  the 
water  settles  out  on  the  surface  at  ordinary  temperatures  suffi- 
ciently well  to  be  run  off,  but  thicker  tars  require  to  be  moder- 
ately heated  to  cause  a  satisfactory  separation.  The  still-head 
is  connected  with  a  condensing  worm,  from  which  the  various 
products  of  distillation  are  conducted  into  different  receivers. 
At  the  end  of  the  distillation  process,  the  fire  is  drawn  out 
and  the  temperature  allowed  to  fall  to  a  point  at  which  the 


31 

pitch  left  behind  in  the  still — though  remaining  liquid — will  not 
ignite  when  it  comes  in  contact  with  the  air.  This  pitch  is  then 
run  out  into  barrels,  or  other  suitable  receivers.  Sometimes, 
in  the  last  stages  of  the  distillation,  superheated  steam  or  a 
vacuum  is  utilized,  since  either  of  these  causes  the  high-boiling- 
point  products  to  pass  over  at  a  lower  temperature  than  would 
otherwise  have  to  be  employed.  Recently,  tar  has  been  success- 
fully treated  in  continuous  distillation  apparatus. 

As  is  shown  below,  the  various  first  products  of  coal  tar 
give,  on  refinement,  numerous  compounds  of  supreme  importance 
in  technical  chemistry.  The  amounts  of  these  compounds 
obtained  from  tar  vary  considerably  with  the  nature  of  the  tar 
itself;  and  the  following  figures  merely  give  an  approximate 
idea  of  the  quantities  which  may  be  expected  from  an  average 
coal  tar: — 

Derivatives  of  Coal  Tar — 

Benzene  and  homologues 2  •  5% 

Phenol  and  homologues 2-0% 

Pyridine  and  other  bases 0-25% 

Naphthalene 6-0% 

Heavy  oil 22     % 

Crude  anthracene  (30%  pure) 1  -5% 

Pitch 60     % 

Water  and  loss 6     % 

The  Light  Oil  (see  Table  IV),  which  is  3 — 6  per  cent  of  the 
original  tar,  contains : — 

Phenols 5     -   15     % 

Pyridines 1     -     3     % 

Sulphur  compounds 0-1% 

Nitriles 0-2-     0-3% 

Neutral  substances 1-0—     1  •  5% 

Hydrocarbons 80     - 100     % 

The  hydrocarbons  are  almost  completely  aromatic,  four- 
fifths  being  benzene  and  its  homologues,  and  one-fifth  naphtha- 
lene. 


32 

The  Middle  Oil,  which  constitutes  8 — 12  per  cent  of  the  tar 
contains : — 

Phenol 10% 

Cresols 20% 

Naphthalene 30% 

Residue— heavy  oil 40% 

In  addition,  the  oil  contains  considerable  quantities  of 
pyridine  and  other  bases. 

The  Heavy  Oil,  10 — 12  per  cent  of  the  tar,  is  a  semi-liquid 
product  containing: — 

Naphthalene 30% 

Cresols  and  homologues 10% 

Pyridine  bases 6% 

Unknown  hydrocarbons 40% 

Anthracene  Oil,  which  is  11 — 16  per  cent  of  the  tar,  contains 
about  3  per  cent  pure  anthracene,  6  per  cent  phenols,  and 
numerous  other  liquid  and  solid  compounds. 

Pitch,  amounting  to  as  high  as  60  per  cent  of  the  weight 
of  tar,  contains  varying  quantities  of  free  carbon:  thus,  coke- 
oven  pitch  and  vertical  retort  pitch  may  contain  as  low  as  2 
per  cent  free  carbon;  while  in  horizontal  retort  pitch  there  may 
be  as  much  as  40  per  cent. 

The  following  table  shows,  diagrammatically,  the  first 
products  of  a  tar  distillation,  and  a  typical  method  by  which 
these  are  worked  up  in  many  tar  distilleries  to  obtain  the  further 
products  shown.  These  products  are  themselves  the  parent 
substances  of  innumerable  compounds,  many  of  which  are  of 
the  greatest  technical  importance,  as  will  be  seen  later. 

The  ranges  of  temperature  mentioned  are  given  merely 
to  indicate  the  approximate  limits  between  which  the  different 
oils  are  collected,  and  not  to  put  down  any  definite  rule  of 
distillation.  Tar  distillers  vary  their  method  of  working  con- 
siderably, according  to  the  demand  for  different  products; 
for  example,  with  a  strong  market  for  creosote  oil  (heavy  oil), 
the  distiller  will  desire  to  make  as  much  of  that  product  as 
possible,  hence  may  collect  the  oil  between  wider  limits  than  is 
indicated  in  the  table,  and  sell  the  product  without  further 
purification. 


33 

COMMERCIAL  PRODUCTS  OF  COAL  TAR;  THEIR  USES 
AND  DERIVATIVES. 

90%  Benzol. 

Uses.— 

As  a  solvent  for  the  manufacture  of  colours,  for  ex- 
tracting fat  from  bones  and  seeds,  and  for  making  iron 
varnishes;  also,  as  a  detergent;  as  a  fuel  for  internal 
combustion  engines;  and  for  carburetting  gas. 

Derivatives. — 

By  distillation,  pure  benzene,  toluene,  xylene,  etc., 
are  obtained.  Benzene  is  widely  used  in  the  prepara- 
tion of  numerous  technical  organic  products.  From 
it  nitro-benzene,  aniline,  etc.,  are  readily  obtained,  and 
therefore  it  is  the  parent  substance  of  the  numerous 
aniline  dyes;  of  many  artificial  perfumes;  and  of 
photographic  developers,  etc.  Toluene  and  xylene 
are  used  in  the  preparation  of  certain  dyes.  The  for- 
mer gives  on  nitration  trinitrotoluene,  a  substance 
used  in  the  manufacture  of  explosives. 


50%  Benzol. 

Use  — 

As  a  substitute  for  the  90  per  cent  benzol,  in  the  manu- 
facture of  certain  dyes. 


Solvent  Naphtha. 

Uses. — 

As  a  solvent  for  rubber  in  the  preparation  of  water- 
proof fabrics;  as  a  detergent;  and  as  a  solvent  in  the 
purification  of  anthracene. 


34 
Crystalline  Carbolic  Acid. 

Use  — 

As  an  antiseptic. 

Derivatives. — 

By  nitration,  carbolic  acid  gives  picric  acid,  which  is 
used  in  the  manufacture  of  many  important  explosives, 
and  of  some  dyes.  It  is  the  source  of  many  substances 
used  in  the  colour  industry  (e.g.  salicylic  acid),  and  of 
certain  photographic  developers  (e.g.  metol). 

Liquid  Carbolic  Acid. 

Uses.— 

As  a  liquid  antiseptic,  and  as  the  active  principle  of 
disinfectant  soaps,  powders,  etc. 

Naphthalene. 

Uses  — 

For  carburetting  gas;  for  disinfecting  purposes;  for 
driving  explosive  motors;  for  preserving  raw  hides; 
and  sometimes  also  for  fuel.  Crude  naphthalene  is 
usually  employed  for  the  above  purposes. 

Derivatives. — 

Pure  naphthalene  is  the  starting  point  in  the  manu- 
facture of  a  large  number  of  important  artificial  colours 
(phthalein  colours,  azo-colours,  indigo,  etc.). 

Heavy  Oil.     Also  called  Creosote  Oil. 

Uses.— 

As  an  illuminant  where  smoke  is  no  objection;  as  an 
antiseptic;  as  a  timber  preservative ;  as  a  lubricant;  as 
a  binder,  when  mixed  with  pitch,  in  the  manufacture  of 
patent  fuels;  as  a  fuel;  and  as  a  solvent. 


35 


50%  Anthracene. 

Uses  — 

Not  important. 

Derivatives. — 

Anthracene  is  the  raw  material  from  which  alizarin 
and  other  important  colouring  matters  are  manufactured. 

Anthracene  Oil. 

Us*.— 

For  lubricating  purposes;  for  timber  preservation;  for 
making  soft  from  hard  pitch ;  for  removing  naphthalene 
from  coal  gas. 

Pitch. 

Uses.— 

For  road  making;    for  preparing  artificial  asphalt  by 
admixture  with  heavy  oil ;  for  manufacturing  varnishes 
by   admixture   with   middle   oil;    for   making   patent 
fuels,    after   softening   by   admixture   with  heavy  or 
anthracene  oil;   for  insulating  cables,  etc.;  for  roofing; 
and  for  making  coke  for  electric  carbons. 
Lunge  gives  the  following  diagram,  which  shows  clearly 
the  various  first  products  obtained  from  coal  tar. 


36 


TABLE  V 
First  Products  from  Coal  Tar 

(Lunge) 


Coal 


Tar 


f-  Ammoniacal 
Liquor 


-  First  Runnirigs 


-  Light  Oil 


Carbolic  Oil 


-  Creosote  Oil 


-  Anthracene  Oil 


«-  Hard  Pitch 


37 
COAL  TAR  IN  THE  INDUSTRIES. 

The  many  uses  mentioned  for  the  substances  enumerated 
above  clearly  indicate  their  vast  technical  importance.  The 
commercial  aspect  of  the  relations  of  these  coal-tar  products  to 
certain  large  industries  is  discussed  in  the  following  sections: — 

Timber  Preservation. 

Wood,  when  exposed  to  moisture,  or  set  in  water,  may 
decay  through  the  action  of  different  organisms  or  fungi;  or 
it  may  be  destroyed  by  insects.  To  prevent  this,  the  timber 
is  soaked  in  some  chemical  which  will  act  as  a  poison  to  such 
enemies.  Mercuric  chloride,  copper  sulphate,  and  zinc 
chloride,  are  examples  of  suitable  poisons,  and  of  these  the 
last  named  is  widely  used.  They  are,  however,  all  soluble  in 
water,  and  may  be  rather  quickly  washed  out  by  rain,  etc. 
Creosote  oil,  on  the  other  hand,  is  an  efficient  preservative 
which  is  insoluble  in  water  and  consequently  is  more  permanent 
in  its  action.  It  gradually  evaporates,  but,  if  a  heavy  oil  be 
chosen,  the  rate  of  evaporation  is  very  slow.  Coal  tar — also 
insoluble  in  water — is  often  used;  but  its  penetrating  power 
is  small.  Creosote  oil  is,  therefore,  the  most  suitable  material 
for  timber  preservation,  and  is  most  used  in  Canada. 

The  wood  to  be  preserved  is  put  into  iron  tanks,  which  are 
then  closed  and  evacuated ;  the  heated  oil  is  now  run  in  and  the 
wood  allowed  to  remain  immersed  under  pressure  for  some  time 
to  ensure  the  complete  filling  of  the  pores.  The  preservative, 
to  be  effective,  should  contain  high-boiling  oils;  for  general 
purposes  not  more  than  50  per  cent  of  it  should  distil  below 
315°C.,  but  for  wood  paving  blocks  not  more  than  55  per  cent 
should  distil  below  that  temperature.  Economy  of  creosote 
oil  can  be  obtained  by  the  use  of  an  inferior  oil,  which  should 
be  mixed  hot,  in  the  proportion  of  80  parts  oil  to  20  parts  of 
coke-oven  tar,  the  latter  containing  not  more  than  5  to  6  per 
cent  of  free  carbon.  The  penetration  of  such  a  mixture  is  not 
less  than  that  of  creosote  oil,  if  the  time  for  which  the  timber  is 
kept  under  pressure  be  slightly  increased. 


285O53 


38 

On  the  American  continent  the  demand  for  creosote  oil 
is  much  greater  than  the  supply.  In  1913  the  United  States 
consumed,  for  timber  preservation,  over  90  million  gallons  (Imp.) 
of  the  oil,  and  of  this  62  per  cent  was  imported  from  Europe. 
Between  60  per  cent  and  70  per  cent  of  the  total  quantity  of 
oil  consumed  was  used  for  the  treatment  of  railway  ties,  some 
25  million  being  thus  treated.  In  Canada,  19  million  cross-ties 
are  used  annually,  and  only  about  10  per  cent  of  these  are 
creosoted;  but  even  for  this  comparatively  small  number, 
Canada  does  not  produce  sufficient  creosote  oil.  If  all  the  tar 
produced  in  gas  and  coke-oven  works  in  the  country  were  dis- 
tilled, the  home  supply  of  creosote  oil  would  still  be  quite  un- 
equal to  the  demand,  and  tar  distillers  would  therefore  be  certain 
of  a  sale  for  one  of  their  most  important  products. 

Road  Making. 

Raw  tar  is  sometimes  used  in  the  making  of  roads ;  but  it  is 
better  to  employ  the  prepared  or  dehydrated  tar.  This  is 
generally  poured  or  sprayed  on  existing  roads.  In  dry 
weather  it  serves  to  keep  the  surface  free  from  dust,  and  in  wet 
weather  it  protects  the  road  material  from  the  disintegrating 
effects  of  water.  In  the  actual  construction  of  roads  coal- 
tar  pitch  and  asphalt  are  much  used  instead  of  tar.  Coal- 
tar  asphalt  is  made  by  mixing  pitch  with  suitable  quantities  of 
creosote  and  anthracene  oils;  and,  although  it  cannot  entirely 
replace  the  natural  asphalt  in  street  paving,  it  is  a  very  good 
substitute.  For  making  sidewalks  a  mixture  of  coal-tar  pitch 
and  natural  asphalt  is  often  employed,  sandy  material  being 
ground  up  with  the  mixture,  which  is  then  melted  and  mixed 
with  gravel. 

The  use  of  pitch,  etc.,  in  the  making  of  roads  is  increasing 
rapidly;  and  even  at  the  present  time  there  is  a  good  demand 
for  this  residual  material  from  the  distillation  of  coal  tar. 

Disinfectants. 

Carbolic  acid  in  its  pure  crystallized  state  is  used  for  medi- 
cinal purposes,  as  an  antiseptic,  etc.;  but  it  has  a  much  wider 


39 

application  in  the  crude  state  for  disinfectant  purposes  generally. 
The  impure  carbolic  acid  has  a  strong  unpleasant  smell.  It 
becomes  partially  liquid  on  standing,  and  in  this  state  is  much 
used  for  disinfecting  sewers,  stables,  etc.  Various  preparations 
of  carbolic  acid  or  the  other  phenols  are  made  to  render  the 
application  of  the  disinfectant  more  convenient.  The  most 
important  preparations  are  those  in  which  the  phenols  are  com- 
bined with  soap;  but  carbolic-acid  powders,  which  are  mixtures 
of  carbolic  acid  and  lime,  etc.,  are  extensively  used.  Naphtha- 
lene sometimes  replaces  carbolic  acid  as  a  disinfectant,  being 
used  in  sick  rooms,  etc.,  and  is  often  preferable  to  carbolic  acid 
for  the  dressing  of  wounds.  It  also  acts  as  a  preventive  against 
moths,  etc. 

Explosives. 

Phenol  is  the  parent  substance  of  several  important  ex- 
plosives, and  most  of  the  carbolic  acid  produced  is  used  in  their 
manufacture.  By  the  nitration  of  phenol,  picric  acid  is  formed, 
and  this  acid  and  its  still  more  explosive  salts  are  utilized  in 
the  preparation  of  such  explosives  as  lyddite,  melinite,  etc. 
Trinitrotoluene  and  trinitrobenzene  are  also  used  in  various 
preparations  for  the  manufacture  of  explosives;  the  corres- 
ponding dinitro  compounds  explode  only  when  admixed  with 
saltpetre,  etc. 

Power  Production. 

The  use  of  tar  as  a  fuel  has  already  been  mentioned,  but  in 
addition  to  this,  some  of  the  products  of  distillation  are  useful 
for  power  production.  The  most  important  is  benzol,  which 
is  being  increasingly  used  in  internal  combustion  engines, 
since  it  has  a  higher  heating  value  than  petroleum  spirit,  and  does 
not  appear  to  deposit  much  more  carbon  in  the  cylinder.  The 
technical  benzol,  consisting  of  95  per  cent  benzene  and  5  per 
cent  toluene,  is  generally  used  for  this  purpose.  Until  the 
value  of  naphthalene  in  the  preparation  of  colours  was  dis- 
covered, that  substance  was  considerably  used  as  a  fuel;  it  is 
still  sometimes  used  for  heating  purposes,  being  injected  in  the 
liquid  state  into  furnaces  as  was  described  for  tar;  and  is  also 


40 

used  for  driving  explosion  motors.     Heavy  coal-tar  oil  also  finds 
some  application  as  a  fuel. 

The  introduction  of  the  Diesel  engine  has  opened  up  a  new 
and  important  use  for  heavy  oils.  The  great  success  with  which 
the  Diesel  engine  has  already  met  is  due  partly  to  its  simplicity 
and  economy,  and  partly  to  its  adaptability  for  using  many  kinds 
of  liquid  fuel.  Although  most  kinds  of  crude  oil  are  applicable, 
it  is  preferable  partially  to  refine  the  fuel  before  use.  It  has  been 
shown  that  mineral  oils  freed  from  benzene,  lignite  tar  oils, 
and  animal  or  vegetable  fat  oils,  can  always  be  used  as  fuel; 
but  that  coal-tar  oil,  and  also  vertical  retort,  water  gas,  oil  gas, 
and  coke-oven  tars  may  be  used  only  with  the  aid  of  special 
apparatus.  Tars  from  horizontal  or  inclined  retorts  cannot 
be  used.  The  following  specifications  for  coal  tar  or  tar  oil 
for  Diesel  engines  are  given  by  Rath  and  Rossenbeck  (Zeit. 
Ver.  deutsch.  Ingen.  1913,  page  1490):— 

1.  Tar  oils  must  not  contain  more  than  0-2  per  cent  of 
solids  insoluble  in  xylol,  nor  more  than  0-05  per  cent  of  incom- 
bustible matter. 

2.  Water  must  not  exceed  1  per  cent. 

3 .  The  residue  on  coking  must  not  be  greater  than  3  per  cent. 

4.  At  least  60  per  cent  by  volume  of  the  oil  must  distil 
over  below  300°C. 

5.  The  lower  calorific  value  must  not  be  less  than  8,800 
Cals.  per  kilogram. 

6.  The  flash  point  must  not  be  below  65 °C. 

7.  The  oil  must  be  quite  fluid  at  15°C.,  and  must  not 
deposit  solids  on  standing  for  half  an  hour  at  8°C. 

In  Canada  petroleum  products  for  power  production 
(gasoline  and  heavy  oil)  are  much  cheaper  than  in  most  European 
countries;  so  that  benzol  and  other  coal-tar  distillates  cannot 
readily  compete  with  petroleum  products  as  fuels  in  this  country. 

Detergents  and  Solvents. 

The  more  volatile  distillates  from  coal  tar  are  important 
solvents.  Benzol  is  used  as  a  solvent  in  the  colour  industry; 
and,  owing  to  its  solvent  action  on  fatty  matters,  it  is  used 


41 

either  alone  or  mixed  with  alcohol  for  cleaning  fabrics.  Petro- 
leum "benzin"  is  also  largely  used  for  the  latter  purpose.  Solvent 
naphtha,  which  is  composed  of  the  slightly  higher  boiling  dis- 
tillates, finds  application  in  the  manufacture  of  waterproof 
fabrics,  where  it  is  used  to  dissolve  the  india-rubber.  Naphtha 
is  the  best  solvent  for  anthracene,  and  is  widely  used  in  the 
manufacture  of  that  substance. 


Colour  Industry. 

The  most  important  application  of  the  various  distillation 
products  of  coal  tar  is  in  the  colour  industry.  Many  of  the  puri- 
fied first  products  are  the  parent  substances  of  numerous  im- 
portant dyes.  Benzene,  on  nitration,  forms  nitrobenzene, 
from  which  aniline  is  readily  obtained  by  reduction,  and  this, 
in  turn,  is  the  most  important  material  used  in  making  the  long 
list  of  aniline  dyes.  Naphthalene  on  oxidation  gives  phthalic 
acid,  which  is  used  in  the  preparation  of  fluorescein,  of  the  eosin 
dyes,  as  well  as  of  anthranilic  acid,  which  is  necessary  for  the 
production  of  artificial  indigo.  Anthracene  on  oxidation 
forms  anthraquinone,  which  is  the  parent  substance  of  the 
widely  used  alizarin  dyes. 

It  would  be  a  difficult  matter,  and  probably  an  unprofitable 
one,  to  attempt  at  present  to  form  a  coal-tar  dye  industry  in 
Canada.  The  manufacture  of  colours  is  so  closely  connected 
with  the  manufacture  of  all  kinds  of  other  chemicals — inorganic 
as  well  as  organic — that  it  would  be  practically  impossible  to 
found  the  industry;  furthermore,  there  is  no  one  dye  which  is 
sold  in  very  large  quantities,  so  that  any  firm  which  began  to 
manufacture  colours  would  have  to  be  in  a  position  to  make, 
in  comparatively  small  quantities,  several  hundred  different 
dyes.  It  is  the  popular  idea  that  the  coal-tar  dye  industry  is  a 
huge  one,  and  that  it  constitutes  a  high  percentage  of  the  trade 
with  Germany.  The  trade  of  the  United  States  is  divided  in 
the  census  into  various  branches,  one  of  which  is  "Chemical 
and  Allied  Products;"  this  division  includes  nine  separate  sub- 
divisions, one  of  which  is  called  "Dyestuffs  and  Extracts." 


42 

The  imports  under  the  latter  subdivision  constitute  only  3-8 
per  cent  of  the  imports  of  the  whole  division ;  of  this  amount 
only  27-8  per  cent  comes  under  the  heading  "Artificial  Dye- 
stuffs"  and  "Extracts  for  Dyeing."  It  will  be  seen,  therefore, 
that,  in  the  United  States  at  any  rate,  the  total  trade  in  coal- 
tar  dyes  is,  in  reality,  a  comparatively  small  one.  Canada 
imported  during  the  year  1913-14,  aniline  and  coal-tar  dyes 
to  the  value  of  $469,050,  of  which  $223,871  was  paid  to  Germany, 
and  $174,531  to  the  United  States. 

In  confirmation  of  the  above  statement  that  it  is  at  present 
impracticable  to  found  a  coal-tar  dye  industry  in  Canada,  the 
following  paragraphs  are  quoted  from  an  interview  with  Dr. 
Bernhard  C.  Hesse,  of  New  York,  published  in  the  September 
1914  issue  of  the  "Metallurgical  and  Chemical  Engineering." 
Although  his  statements  refer  to  conditions  in  the  United  States, 
yet  his  remarks  are  well  worth  consideration,  as  it  is  quite 
evident  that,  to  an  even  greater  extent,  the  difficulties  he  men- 
tions would  arise,  should  an  attempt  be  made  to  found  such  an 
industry  in  Canada. 

In  the  coal-tar  industry  the  following  three  divisions  may  be  made  for 
convenience  and  clarity: — 

1.  Products  from  coal  tar  by  distillation,  expression,  and  like  operations. 

2.  Products  obtained  from  1  by  chemical  transformation,  but  not  themselves 

dyes. 

3.  Dyes  made  from  2. 

The  key  to  the  situation  lies  in  division  2,  and  in  this  Germany  controls 
the  world's  market.  This  control  is  due  to  the  facts,  that,  while  the  growth 
of  this  division  was  relatively  slow,  yet  the  field  has  become  very  much  inter- 
woven, each  of  its  hundred  or  more  products  being  dependent  upon  or  made 
up  of  one  or  more  other  products,  so  that  no  one  of  them  is  of  use  without 
still  others;  and  that  the  industrial  and  commercial  conditions  or  relations 
have  grown  with  the  technical  development  so  that  the  coal-tar  dye  industry 
is  really  a  conglomerate  of  many  separate  parts  acting  and  reacting  upon 
each  other,  commercially  and  industrially.  Not  a  single  one  of  the  22  factories 
in  Germany  is  wholly  independent  of  other  factories  in  Germany,  whereas 
together  they  are  independent  of  sources  outside  of  Germany,  or  can  very 
readily  be  so  should  occasion  arise.  It  would  not  do  merely  to  transplant 
even  the  largest  German  works  to  this  country;  a  part  of  probably  each 
German  works  would  be  necessary  to  produce  here  or  anywhere  a  complete 


43 

and  self-contained  industry.  Such  a  transplanting  of  the  coal-tar  dye  in- 
dustry would  be  comparable  to  an  attempt  to  transplant  to  this  country 
every  single  branch  of,  say,  the  textile  industry  or  any  other  highly  ramified 
and  diversified  art. 

Germany's  supremacy  in  this  field  has  been  for  more  than  30  years  a  stand- 
ing challenge  not  only  to  the  chemists  and  capitalists  of  the  United  States, 
but  to  the  chemists  and  capitalists  of  all  the  rest  of  the  world  as  well.  Except 
Switzerland,  no  country  has  succeeded  in  selling  to  Germany  more  coal-tar 
dyes  than  it  buys  from  Germany,  but  all  of  them  without  exception  buy  more 
of  intermediate  products,  i.e.,  division  2,  from  Germany  than  they  sell  to 
Germany. 

There  is  another  side  to  this,  namely,  the  investor's  side.  A  self-contained 
and  complete  coal-tar  dye  industry  in  this  country  would  to-day  call  for 
preparedness  to  make  about  700  different  dyes.  In  the  fiscal  year  1913-1914 
this  country  imported  indigo  to  the  extent  of  $1,093,226,  alizarin  to  the  extent 
of  $845,459,  both  of  which  are  without  tariff  protection,  $7,464,134  worth  of 
aniline  dyes  with  a  duty  of  30  per  cent,  and  aniline  oil  with  a  duty  of  10  per  cent. 
This  means  700  different  aniline  dyes  would  average  a  gross  annual  incomft 
each  of  about  $10,000.  To  introduce  700  different  sets  of  operations,  and  per- 
haps half  that  many  different  sets  of  apparatus,  at  one  time,  to  produce  on  the 
average  for  each  set  of  operations  a  gross  of  $35  per  day,  can  hardly  be  regarded 
as  an  attractive  proposition  when  the  initial  lump  gross  outlay  would  be 
not  less  than  $5,000,000  actual  cash.  Each  of  these  700  products  requires 
good  manufacture  from  the  start,  because  good  qualities  of  each  are  already 
on  the  market.  It  is  one  thing  to  grow  and  develop  such  an  industry  or  art 
and  to  maintain  it  against  newcomers,  but  it  is  quite  a  different  thing  to 
build  it  up  afresh  in  its  entirety  in  the  face  of  competition,  and  to  hold  it  against 
those  who  developed  the  business,  know  all  its  ins  and  outs,  have  their  ex- 
perience and  plant  bought,  paid  for,  and  written  off,  long  ago.  It  could 
hardly  be  expected  that,  if  successful,  this  industry  would  employ  as  many 
as  7,000  people  all  told,  and  the  gross  makes  out  less  than  0-4  per  cent  of  our 
total  import  business. 

With  unlimited  and  immediately  available  capital  the  American  chemist 
can  build  up  such  a  complete  industry,  but  the  dividends  would  be  a  long 
way  off.  Capitalists,  American  or  otherwise,  do  not  take  kindly  to  such 
handicaps  or  obstacles,  and  justly  so. 

The  truth  seems  to  be  that  the  whole  of  this  industry  cannot  be  success- 
fully transplanted,  and  attempts  to  transplant  part  only  have  not  resulted 
in  any  self-contained  and  independent  industry  anywhere,  but  in  an  industry 
the  real  roots  of  which  are  still  in  German  soil;  even  if  it  could  be  transplanted 
as  a  whole,  the  net  result  would  not  be  commensurate  with  the  expense, 
effort,  and  risk  connected  with  it.  What  portion  or  part,  if  any,  or  what 
equivalent  of  a  complete  and  self-contained  industry  for  all  the  domestic 
needs  of  this  country  could  ultimately  be  transplanted  here,  is  a  problem 
that  has  had  the  serious  attention  of  competent  chemists  and  capitalist*  in 


44 

this  country  for  many  years,  without  a  definite  or  satisfactory  answer  thereto 
having  been  arrived  at.  Whether  the  present  conditions  will  contribute 
to  a  solution  of  the  problem  cannot  be  decided  out  of  hand ;  the  first  impression 
certainly  is  that  they  will  not  so  contribute. 


CANADIAN  TRADE  STATISTICS. 

Some  statistics  have  already  been  given  in  the  text;  but, 
in  order  to  group  together  figures  in  a  more  convenient  form, 
the  following  tables  (compiled  from  Mineral  Production  of  Can- 
ada, 1913,  by  J.  McLeish,  Mines  Branch,  Ottawa;  from  Trade 
and  Navigation  Unrevised  Monthly  Statements  of  Imports 
Entered  for  Consumption,  March,  1914;  and  from  Weekly 
Report,  No.  554,  Department  of  Trade  and  Commerce,  Canada) 
have  been  arranged  for  products  mentioned  in  this  report, 
and  also  for  products  which  compete  with,  or  have  any  bearing 
upon  them: — 


45 


IS 

NO    O                                                                                          »O    NO 

to  to                                                                  to  cs 

OO    00                                                                                                 O    tO 

3 

00    ON 

CN"  O"                                                                                                                 CO"  ON" 

t-     •* 

O   OO                                                                                          t--    to 

? 

Tj<    ON 

t~    *-l                                                                                                         ON    (O 

f 

ON   t^» 

^  ^2 

J3 

|| 

O   to 
00   0\ 

~t                        ;  ; 

"ti  "*"* 

ON"   0 

cs  cs                                                                             i      ! 

rt    u 

ID    CS 

\o  t*~ 

II 

51  s 

•     ; 

ON    IO 

O    ^-  *                                                                                              •  10 

to  to 

i>-  ^*                                                                         •  oo 

U 

T-T   ^ 

CN    OO                                                                                                             •   «>T 

g> 

CN    NO 

00    ON 

10   O 

O4   CO 

m 

""" 

I 
W 

>,£ 

•ti    o 

Si 

P.                   !§ 

"f^    4"J 

CN    NO 

t~     00                                                                                                                                   •    T(< 

to   NO 

™     o 

D     2 

ai/5 

CN    1-H 

1 

is 

•    *—  t    ^                              O                                                       O    ON 
•  to   ON                         »/•>                                               to   tO 

•    CO     NO                                   1-H                                                                 O     Tj< 

H 

o> 

3 

ag" 

•  TjT  t>.                 NO                               10"  NO 

.     NO      Tj*                                           NO                                                                                 Tj<      O 

c 

"3  ** 

O    CN 

•   TH   to                         OO                                               fO   ^ 

1 

g 

> 

S~to~ 

•  i^«o" 

ex 
6 

o 

^ 

U 

1 

£ 

Quantity. 
Short  tons. 

cs  oo 

00    0 

NOI^^HCT                       fT^cT                            -                       VOfVl 

Tj<lOTj<lO                   tOtO                           O                   «OON 

^H^-H'^-I^-I                         tOOO                                        -                       OOt^ 

J 

1 

•    CN    to              j,        •                ^               |' 

'? 

:  S  S      ^    :       :      « 

K 

•                    °^      •        ^A        ^H 

^-H 

1 

ij    j"i  |  !„    ; 

:  a.         a  -I     J      ^  ^           :    : 

if  11  i  E,:  32 

estOT3                ga          <n          g^                a  ^3 

SSl       §  si  1    2s 

gure  supplied  by  ^ 

••—    ^—  t 

*-«                           w2*Trt"S                 tO    "^                  |^-H^-( 

•-1 

s  s 

"=        °           |  -ii-  xSS  |       |  &       g  S  S 

- 

J. 

1|     1        l^eSl     1^     | 

1 

"0                                                                       ^>                                                         ^5 

U 

U                               «                         «              CU 

46 

TABLE  VII. 
Canadian  Imports. 


Articles  and  countries 
whence  imported. 

Twelve  months  ending 
March,  1914. 

Tariff. 

Quantity. 

Value  in 
dollars. 

Coal,   anthracite,   and    anthracite 
dust:  — 
From  G.  Britain 

Tons 
33,909 
4,351,833 

57 

1,711 
2,934,286 

964 
711 
10,798,271 
18,301 

337 
708,440 

Galls. 
18,684 
2,625,731 
2,375 

127,670 
1,329,889 
20 
Cwts. 
15,598 
715,716 
246,676 
17,521 
74,843 

149,529 
20,584,198 
399 

3,935 
4,296,010 

3,478 
2,412 
21,768,147 
66,694 

2,199 
2,058,715 

881 
112,309 
622 

6,509 
74,733 
7 

15,412 
601,960 
159,073 
9,259 

47,918 

Free 

a 
a. 

General 

General 
Preferential 
General 

u 

Free 
Free 

a 

Free 

• 

u 

Free 

U.  States 

Other  countries  
Coal,  bituminous  slack  such  as  will 
pass  through  a  f"  screen:  — 
From  G.  Britain  
U.  States  

Coal,  bituminous,  round,  and  run 
of  the  mine  —  and  coal  N.O.P:  — 
From  G.  Britain  .  . 

U.  States  
Other  countries  
Coke:— 
From  G.  Britain  

U.  States  
Coal  and  pine  tar,  crude,  in  pack- 
ages of  not  less  than  15  gallons:  — 

U.  States 

Other  countries  
Coal  and  pine  pitch  :  — 
From  G.  Britain  
U.  States  
Other  countries  
Asphaltum  or  asphalt,  solid:  — 
From  G.  Britain 

U.  States  
Mexico  
Germany  
Other  countries  

47 


TABLE  VII.— Continued. 


Articles  and  countries 
whence  imported. 

Twelve  months  ending 
March,  1914. 

Tariff. 

Quantity. 

Value  in 
dollars. 

Asphalt,  not  solid:  — 

Galls. 
329,639 
683,117 
9,441 

Lbs. 
309,590 
7,852,591 
147,356 
38,482 

54,410 
27,240 
15,000 

131,444 
4,360 

191,516 

563,375 
1,354,928 
128,785 
1,691 

39 
33,318 

28,087 

57,414 
53,599 
3,307 

13,705 
143,299 
5,559 
1,712 

5,677 
2,961 
2,664 

10,035 

625 

37,840 

174,531 
223,871 
32,553 
255 

Preferential 
General 

Free 
Free 

« 
a 

Free 

a 

Free 

a 

Free 

a 

Free 

U.  States  

Asphaltum  oil:  — 
From  U.  States  
Carbolic  or  heavy  oil:  — 

U  States    .  . 

Other  countries  
Dyeing  or  tanning  articles  in  a  crude 
state  used  in  dyeing  or  tanning, 
N.O.P.:— 

U.  States  

Germany  
Other  countries  
Aniline  oil,  crude:  — 
From  G  Britain 

U.  States  
Other  countries  

Aniline  salts:  — 

U.  States  
Aniline  and  coal-tar  dyes,  soluble 
in  water,  in  bulk  or  packages  o 
not  less  than  1  Ib.  weight,  includ- 
ing alizarin  and    artificial  aliz- 
arin: — 
From  G.  Britain  
U.  States  

Germany 

Switzerland  
Other  countries  

48 


TABLE  Mil.— Continued. 


Articles  and  countries 
whence  imported. 

Twelve  months  ending 
March,  1914. 

Tariff. 

Quantity. 

Value  in 
dollars. 

Aniline  dyes  in   packages  of  less 
than  1  Ib.  weight:  — 
From  G.  Britain 

Lbs. 
1,300 

480 
875 
50 

16,166 
21,645 

3,608 

1,265 
20,479 
125,990 

273,206 
77,131 
1,094 

146,611 
1,002,317 
560,700 

480,966 
35,898,258 
43,578,050 
229,774 
75,133 

206 
52 
334 
15 

2,316 
3,081 

1,414 

90 
3,170 
20,388 

7,757 
2,944 

148 

5 
996 
2,072 

7,610 
51,556 
25,708 

12,719 
826,277 
767,265 
8,568 
3,547 

General 
Preferential 
General 

a 

Free 

Free 

Free 
« 

u 

Free 

a 
a 

Free 

a 

Free 

« 

a 

Free 

a 
u 
a 
a 

u 

U.  States  
Other  countries  
Coal-tar  base  or  salt  (paranitrani- 
line)  :— 
From  U.  States. 

Other  countries  

Indigo:  — 
From  U.  States  

Indigo,  paste  and  extract  of:  — 
From  G.  Britain 

U.  States  
Germany  
Ammonia,  sulphate  of:  — 
From  G.  Britain  

U.  States  

Other  countries 

Fertilizers  unmanufactured, 
N.O.P.:— 
From  G.  Britain  
U.  States  

Other  countries 

Saltpetre  or  nitrate  of  potash:  — 
From  G.Britain... 

U.  States  
Germany  
Soda,  nitrate  of,  or  cubic  nitre:  — 

U  States 

Chili 

Germany 

Other  countries  

49 

TABLE  VII—  Continued. 


Articles  and  countries 
whence  imported. 

Twelve  months  ending 
March,  1914. 

Tariff. 

Quantity. 

Value  in 
dollars. 

Acid  nitric:  — 
From  G.  Britain  

Lbs. 

8,480 
254,196 

114,545 
268,186 
340,886 
180,576 
1,667,851 

4,800 

280,200 
54,330 

56,696 

273,882 

378,767 
68,573 
297,069 
40,363 

685,068 
928,707 
1,715 

497 
13,610 

6,502 
17,982 
19,973 
9,645 
93,888 

300 

28,294 
3,732 

37,151 

52,856 

20,670 
4,147 
14,834 
1,891 

100,706 
142,997 
204 

Preferential 
General. 

Free 

a 
a 
u 

a 

Free 

Preferential 
General 

Preferential 
General 

Free 

ft 
ft 

ft 

Free 

U 

a 

U  States 

Ammonia,  nitrate  of:  — 
From  G  Britain                 .... 

U.  States  

Norway  

Other  countries 

Nitrate  compound,  adapted  for  use 
in  the  manufacture  of  explosives: 
From  U.  States  

Blasting    and    mining     powder:  — 

U.  States 

Giant  powder,  nitro,  nitroglycerine, 
and  other  explosives,  N.O.P.:  — 
From  G.  Britain  

U  States 

Salammoniac  :  — 
From  G.  Britain  
U.  States  

Germany  

Other  countries  
Cyanide  of  potassium,  cyanide  of 
sodium,    cyanogen   bromide   for 
reducing  metals  in  mining  oper- 
ations: — 
From  G  Britain 

U.  States  

Germany  

50 


TABLE  VII.— Continued. 


Articles  and  countries 
whence  imported. 

Twelve  months  ending 
March,  1914. 

Tariff. 

Quantity. 

Value  in 
dollars. 

Potash,  red  and  yellow  prussiate 
of:— 
From  G.  Britain  
U.  States  
Germany  
Other  countries  

Lbs. 
52,098 
5,997 
59,109 
49,697 

42,415 
79,942 
33,495 

Galls. 
27,451,397 

177,879,835 

45,853 

175 
19,278,099 
2,205 

1,611 
165,766 
913 

5,969 
908 
7,259 
5,886 

3,711 
4,246 
2,907 

4,466,986 
5,994,318 

4,903 

33 
1,350,502 
563 

787 
65,427 
510 

Free 

a 
u 
a 

Free 

a 

Free 
Free 

General 
General 

a 
a 

Preferential 
General 

• 

Soda,  prussiate  and  sulphite  of:  — 
From  G.  Britain 

U.  States  

Other  countries  
Gasoline  under  0  •  725  specific  grav- 
ity at  60  degrees  temperature:  — 
From  U.  States 

Petroleum,  crude,  fuel  and  gas  oils 
(0  •  8235  specific  gravity  or  heavier 
at  60  degrees  temperature):  — 
From  U.  States  

Petroleum,    crude,   gas   oils   other 
than  naphtha,  benzene  and  gaso- 
line, lighter  than  0-8235  but  not 
less  than  0-775  specific  gravity 
at  60  degrees:  — 
From  U.  States  

Coal    oil    and    kerosene,    distilled 
purified  or  refined:  — 
From  G.  Britain  

U.  States 

Other  countries  
Illuminating  oils  composed  wholly 
or  in  part  of  the   products  of 
petroleum,  coal  shale  or  lignite, 
costing    more    than    30    cents 
per  gallon  :  — 
From  G.  Britain  
U.  States  
Other  countries  

51 


TABLE  VII— Continued. 


Articles  and  countries 
whence  imported. 

Twelve  months  ending 
March,  1914. 

Tariff. 

Quantity. 

Value  in 
dollars. 

Lubricating  oils  composed  wholly 
or  in  part  of  petroleum  and  cost- 
ing less  than  25  cents  per  gal- 
lon:— 
From  G.  Britain 

Galls. 

2,853 
10,388 
5,134,973 
8,520 

8,967 
105,496 
991,316 
6,804 

26,819 
5,138,909 
546 

643 
2,369 
707,811 
1,985 

3,062 
36,444 
333,584 
3,580 

6,740 
618,506 
121 

General 
Preferential 
General 

a 

General 
Preferential 

General 

« 

Preferential 
General 

« 

a 

U.  States  
Other  countries  

Lubricating  oils,  N.O.P.:  — 
From  G.  Britain             

U.  States  

Other  countries  
Petroleum,  products  of,  N.O.P.:  — 
From  G.  Britain   .  .            .    . 

U.  States  
Other  countries  

NOTE. — N.O.P.  signifies  "not  otherwise  prorided  for." 


CANADA 

DEPARTMENT  OF  MINES 

HON.  LOUIS    CODERRE,    MINISTER;    R.    G.    McCONNELL,    DEPUTY    MINISTER, 

MINES  BRANCH 

EUGENE  HAANEL,  PH.D.,  DIRECTOR. 
REPORTS  AND   MAPS 

PUBLISHED  BY   THE 

MINES  BRANCH 


REPORTS. 

1.     Mining  conditions  in  the  Klondike,  Yukon.     Report  on — by  Eugene 
Haanel,  Ph.d.,  1902. 

f2.  Great  landslide  at  Frank,  Alta.  Report  on — by  R.  G.  McConnell. 
B.A.,  and  R.  W.  Brock,  M.A.,  1903. 

f3.  Investigation  of  the  different  electro-thermic  processes  for  the  smelting 
of  iron  ores  and  the  making  of  steel,  in  operation  in  Europe.  Report 
of  Special  Commission — by  Eugene  Haanel,  Ph.D.,  1904. 

5.     On  the  location  and  examination  magnetic  ore  deposits  by  mag- 
netometric  measurements — by  Eugene  Haanel,  Ph.D.,  1904. 

f7.  Limestones,  and  the  lime  industry  of  Manitoba.  Preliminary  report 
on— by  J.  W.  Wells,  M.A.,  1905. 

f8.  Clays  and  shales  of  Manitoba:  their  industrial  value.  Preliminary 
report  on— by  J.  W.  Wells,  M.A.,  1905. 

|9.  Hydraulic  cements  (raw  materials)  in  Manitoba:  manufacture  and 
uses  of.  Preliminary  report  on — by  J.  W.  Wells,  M.A.,  1905. 

flO.  Mica:  its  occurrence,  exploitation,  and  uses — by  Fritz  Cirkel,  M.E., 
1905.  (See  No.  118.) 

fll.  Asbestos:  its  occurrence,  exploitation,  and  uses — by  Fritz  Cirkel, 
M.E.,  1905.  (See  No.  69.) 

f!2.  Zinc  resources  of  British  Columbia  and  the  conditions  affecting  their 
exploitation.  Report  of  the  Commission  appointed  to  investigate 
—by  W.  R.  Ingalls,  M.E.,  1905. 

f!6.  *Experiments  made  at  Sault  Ste.  Marie,  under  Government  auspices, 
in  the  smelting  of  Canadian  iron  ores  by  the  electro-thermic 
process.  Final  report  on — by  Eugene  Haanel,  Ph.D.,  1907. 

f!7.  Mines  of  the  silver-cobalt  ores  of  the  Cobalt  district:  their  present 
and  prospective  output.  Reoort  on — by  Eugene  Haanel,  Ph.D., 
1907. 

*  A  few  copies  of  the  Preliminary  Report,  1906.  are  still  available, 
t  Publications  marked  thus  t  are  out  of  print. 


|18.  Graphite:  its  properties,  occurrence,  refining,  and  uses — by  Fritz 
Cirkel,  M.E.,  1907. 

f!9.  Peat  and  lignite:  their  manufacture  and  uses  in  Europe — by  Erik 
Nystrom,  M.E.,  1908. 

f20.  Iron  ore  deposit  of  Nova  Scotia.  Report  on  (Part  I)— by  J.  E.  Wood- 
man, D.Sc. 

21.  Summary  report  of  Mines  Branch,  1907-8. 

22.  Iron  ore  deposits  of  Thunder  Bay  and  Rainy  River  districts.     Report 

on— by  F.  Hille,  M.E. 

f23.  Iron  ore  deposits  along  the  Ottawa  (Quebec  side)and  Gatineau  rivers. 
Report  on — by  Fritz  Cirkel,  M.E. 

24.  General  report  on  the  mining  and  metallurgical  industries  of  Canada, 

1907-8. 

25.  The  tungsten  ores  of  Canada.     Report  on— by  T.  L.  Walker,  Ph.D. 

(Out  of  print.) 

26.  The  mineral  production  of  Canada,    1906.     Annual  report  on — by 

John  McLeish,  B.A. 

|27.  The  mineral  production  of  Canada,  1907.  Preliminary  report  on — 
by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 

f27a.  The  mineral  production  of  Canada,  1908.  Preliminary  report  on — 
by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 

f28.     Summary  report  of  Mines  Branch,  1908. 

29.  Chrome  iron  ore  deposits  of  the  Eastern  Townships.     Monograph  on — 

by    Fritz    Cirkel.     (Supplementary    section:     Experiments    with 
chromite  at  McGill  University— by  J.  B.  Porter,  E.M.,  D.Sc.) 

30.  Investigation  of  the  peat  bogs  and  peat  fuel  industry  of  Canada,  1908. 

Bulletin  No.   1 — by  Erik  Nystrom,  M.E.,  and  A.  Anrep,  Peat 
Expert. 

32.  Investigation  of  electric  shaft  furnace,  Sweden.  Report  on — by 
Eugene  Haanel,  Ph.D. 

47.  Iron  ore  deposits  of  Vancouver  and  Texada  islands.  Report  on — by 
Einar  Lindeman,  M.E. 

f55.  The  bituminous,  or  oil-shales  of  New  Brunswick  and  Nova  Scotia; 
also  on  the  oil-shale  industry  of  Scotland.  Report  on — by  W.  R. 
Ells,  LL.D. 

58.  The  mineral  production  of  Canada,  1907  and  1908.  Annual  report 
on — by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 

t  Publications  marked  thus  t  are  out  of  print. 


NOTE.  —  The  following  parts  were  separately    printed  and   issued  in 
advance  of  the  Annual  Report  for  1907-8. 

|31.     Production  of  cement  in  Canada,  1908. 

42.  Production  of  iron  and  steel  in  Canada  during  the  calendar 

years  1907  and  1908. 

43.  Production  of  chromite  in  Canada  during  the  calendar  years 

1907  and  1908. 

44.  Production  of  asbestos  in  Canada  during  the  calendar  years 

1907  and    1908. 

f45.     Production  of  coal,  coke,  and  peat  in  Canada  during  the  cal- 
endar years  1907  and  1908. 

46.     Production  of  natural  gas 

the  calendar  years  1907  and  1908. 

59.  Chemical  analyses  of  special  economic  importance  made  in  the  labor- 
atories at  the  Department  of  Mines,  1906-7-8.  Report  on — by 
F.  G.  Wait,  M.A.,  F.C.S.  (With  Appendix  on  the  commercial 
methods  and  apparatus  for  the  analysis  of  oil-shales — by  H.  A. 
Leverin,  Ch.  E.) 

Schedule  of  charges  for  chemical  analyses  and  assays. 

|62.  Mineral  production  of  Canada,  1909.  Preliminary  report  on — by 
John  McLeish,  B.A. 

63.     Summary  report  of  Mines  Branch,  1909. 

67.  Iron  ore  deposits  of  the  Bristol  mine,  Pontiac  county,  Quebec.  Bulletin 
No.  2 — by  Einar  Lindeman,  M.E.,  and  Geo.  C.  Mackenzie,  B.Sc. 

f68.  Recent  advances  in  the  construction  of  electric  furnaces  for  the  pro- 
duction of  pig  iron,  steel,  and  zinc.  Bulletin  No.  3 — by  Eugene 
Haanel,  Ph.D. 

69.  Chrysotile-asbestos:  its  occurrence,  exploitation,  milling,  and  uses. 
Report  on — by  Fritz  Cirkel,  M.E.  (Second  edition,  enlarged.) 

f71.  Investigation  of  the  peat  bogs,  and  peat  industry  of  Canada,  1909-10; 
to  which  is  appended  Mr.  Alf.  Larson's  paper  on  Dr.  M.  Ekenberg's 
wet-carbonizing  process:  from  Teknisk  Tidskrift,  No.  12,  Decem- 
ber 26,  1908 — translation  by  Mr.  A.  v.  Anrep,  Jr.;  also  a  transla- 
tion of  Lieut.  Ekelund's  pamphlet  entitled  'A  solution  of  the  peat 
problem,'  1909,  describing  the  Ekelund  process  for  the  manu- 
facture of  peat  powder,  by  Harold  A.  Leverin,  Ch.E.  Bulletin 
No.  4 — by  A.  v.  Anrep.  (Second  edition,  enlarged.) 

82.  Magnetic  concentration  experiments.  Bulletin  No.  5 — by  Geo.  C. 
Mackenzie,  B.Sc. 

t  Publications  marked  thus  t  are  out  of  print. 


83.     An  investigation  of  the  coals  of  Canada  with  reference  to  their  economic 
qualities:  as  conducted  at  McGill  University  under  the  authority 
of  the    Dominion   Government.     Report   on — by   J.    B.    Porter, 
E.M.,  D.Sc.,  R.  J.  Durley,  Ma.E.,  and  others. 
Vol.      I — Coal  washing  and  cooking  tests. 
Vol.    II — Boiler  and  gas  producer  tests. 
Vol.  Ill— (Out  of  print.) 
Appendix  I 

Coal  washing  tests  and  diagrams. 
Vol.  IV— 
Appendix  II 

Boiler  tests  and  diagrams. 
Vol.  V— (Out  of  print.) 
Appendix  III 

Producer  tests  and  diagrams. 
Vol.  VI— 
Appendix  IV 

Coking  tests. 
Appendix  V 
Chemical  tests. 

t84.  Gypsum  deposits  of  the  Maritime  provinces  of  Canada — including  the 
Magalen  islands.  Report  on — by  W.  F.  Jennison,  M.E.  (See 
No.  245.) 

88.  The  mineral  production  of  Canada,    1909.     Annual  report  on — by 

John  McLeish,  B.A. 

NOTE. — The  following  parts  were  separately  printed  and  issued  in 
advance  of  the  Annual  Report  for  1909. 

f79.     Production  of  iron  and  steel  in  Canada  during  the  calendar 

year  1909. 
f80.  Production  of  coal  and  coke  in  Canada  during  the  calendar 

year  1909. 
85.  Production  of  cement,  lime,  clay  products,  stone,  and  other 

structural  materials  during  the  calendar  year  1909. 

89.  Reprint  of  presidential  address  delivered  before  the  American  Peat 

Society  at  Ottawa,  July  25,  1910.     By  Eugene  Haanel,  Ph.D. 

90.  Proceedings  of  conference  on  explosives. 

92.  Investigation  of  the  explosives  industry  in  the  Dominion  of  Canada, 

1910.     Report     on — by     Capt.     Arthur     Desborough.     (Second 
edition.) 

93.  Molybdenum  ores  of  Canada.     Report  on — by  Professor  T.  L.  Walker, 

Ph.D. 

100.  The  building  and  ornamental  stones  of  Canada:  Building  and  orna- 
mental stones  of  Ontario.  Report  on — by  Professor  W.  A.  Parks, 
Ph.D. 

102.  Mineral  production  of  Canada,  1910.  Preliminary  report  on — by 
John  McLeish,  B.A. 

t  Publications  marked  thus  t  are  out  of  print. 


fl03.     Summary  report  of  Mines  Branch,  1910. 

104.  Catalogue  of  publications  of  Mines  Branch,  from  1902  to  1911;   con- 

taining tables  of  contents  and  lists  of  maps,  etc. 

105.  Austin  Brook  iron-bearing  district.      Report  on — by  E.  Lindeman, 

M.K. 

110.  Western  portion  of  Torbrook  iron  ore  deposits,  Annapolis  county,  N.S. 

Bulletin  No.  7— by  Howells  Frechette,  M.Sc. 

111.  Diamond  drilling  at  Point  Mamainse,  Ont.     Bulletin  No.  6— by  A.  C. 

Lane,  Ph.D.,  with  introductory  by  A.  W.  G.  Wilson,  Ph.D. 

118.  Mica:  its  occurrence,  exploitation,  and  uses.  Report  on — by  Hugh 
S.  de  Schmid,  M.E. 

142.  Summary  report  of  Mines  Branch,  1911. 

143.  The  mineral  production  of  Canada,   1910.     Annual  report  on — by 

John    McLeish,    B.A. 

NOTE.     The  following  parts  were  separately  printed  and  issued  in 
advance  of  the  Annual  Report  for  1910. 

fl!4.     Production  of  cement,  lime,  clay  products,  stone,  and  other 

materials  in  Canada,   1910. 
fllS.     Production  of  iron  and  steel  in  Canada  during  the  calendar 

year  1910. 
fl!6.     Production  of  coal  and  coke  in  Canada  during  the  calendar 

year  1910. 
fll7.     General  summary  of  the  mineral  production  of  Canada 

during  the  calendar  year  1910. 

145.  Magnetic  iron  sands  of  Natashkwan,  Saguenay  county,  Que.  Report 
on — by  Geo.  C.  Mackenzie,  B.Sc. 

fl50.     The  mineral  production  of  Canada,  1911.     Preliminary  report  on — 
by  John   McLeish,   B.A. 

151.  Investigation  of  the  peat  bogs  and  peat  industry  of  Canada,  1910-11. 
Bulletin  No.  8 — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 

154.  The  utilization  of  peat  fuel  for  the  production  of  power,  being  a  record 
of  experiments  conducted  at  the  Fuel  Testing  Station,  Ottawa. 
1910-11.  Report  on— by  B.  F.  Haanel,  B.Sc. 

167.  Pyrites  in  Canada:  its  occurrence,  exploitation,  dressing  and  uses. 
Report  on— by  A.  W.  G.  Wilson,  Ph.D. 

170.  The  nickel  industry:  with  special  reference  to  the  Sudbury  region, 
Ont.  Report  on— by  Professor  A.  P.  Coleman,  Ph.D. 

184.  Magnetite  occurrences  along  the  Central  Ontario  railway.  Report 
on — by  E.  Lindeman,  M.E. 

201.  The  mineral  production  of  Canada  during  the  calendar  year  1911. 
— Annual  report  on — by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 

t  Publications  marked  thus  t  are  out  of  print. 


vi 

NOTE. — The  following  parts  were  separately  printed  and  issued  in 
advance  of  the  Annual  Report  for  1911. 

181.  Production  of  cement,  lime,  clay  products,  stone,  and  other 
structural  materials  in  Canada  during  the  calendar  year 
1911.  Bulletin  on— by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 

|182.     Production  of  iron  and  steel  in  Canada  during  the  calendar 

year  1911.     Bulletin  on — by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 
183.     General  summary  of  the  mineral  production  in  Canada 
during,   the  calendar  year   1911.     Bulletin  on — by  John 
McLeish,    B.A. 

f!99.  Production  of  copper,  gold,  lead,  nickel,  silver,  zinc,  and 
other  metals  of  Canada,  during  the  calendar  year  1911. 
Bulletin  on— by  C.  T.  Cartwright,  B.Sc. 

f200.  The  production  of  coal  and  coke  in  Canada  during  the  calen- 
dar year  1911.  Bulletin  on — by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 

203.     Building  stones  of  Canada — Vol.  II:   Building  and  ornamental  stones 
of  the  Maritime  Provinces.     Report  on — by  W.  A.  Parks,  PhD. 

209.     The  copper  smelting  industry  of  Canada.     Report  on — by  A.  W.  G. 
Wilson,  Ph.D. 

216.     Mineral  production  of  Canada,    1912.     Preliminary  report   on — by 
John  McLeish,  B.A. 

222.     Lode  mining  in  Yukon:  an  investigation  of  the  quartz  deposits  of  the 
Klondike  division.     Report  on — by  T.  A.  MacLean,  B.Sc. 

224.     Summary  report  of  the  Mines  Branch,  1912. 

227.     Sections  of  the  Sydney  coal  fields— by  J.  G.  S.  Hudson,  M.E. 

f229.     Summary  report  of  the  petroleum  and  natural  gas  resources  of  Canada, 
1912— by  F.  G.  Clapp,  A.M.     (See  No.  224.) 

230.     Ecomomic  minerals  and  mining  industries  of  Canada. 

245.     Gypsum  in  Canada:    its  occurrence,  exploitation,  and  technology. 
Report  on — by  L.  H.  Cole,  B.Sc. 

254.     Calabogie  iron-bearing  district.     Report  on — by  E.  Lindeman,  M.E. 

259.     Preparation  of  metallic  cobalt  by  reduction  of  the  oxide.     Report  on — 
by  H.  T.  Kalmus,  B.Sc.,  Ph.D. 

262.     The  mineral  production  of  Canada  during  the  calendar  year  1912. 
Annual  report  on — by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 

NOTE. — The  following  parts  were  separately  printed  and  issued  in 
advance  of  the  Annual  Report  for  1912. 

238.  General  summary  of  the  mineral  production  of  Canada, 
during  the  calendar  year  1912.  Bulletin  on — by  John 
McLeish,  B.A. 

t  Publications  marked  thus  t  are  out  of  print. 


f247.     Production  of  iron  and  steel  in  Canada  during  the  calendar 

year  1912.     Bulletin  on — by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 
f256.     Production  of  copper,  gold,  lead,  nickel,  silver,  zinc,  and 

other  metals  of  Canada,  during  the  calendar  year  1912 — 

by  C.  T.  Cartwright,  B.Sc. 
257.     Production  of  cement,  lime,  clay  products,  stone,  and  other 

structural  materials  during  the  calendar  year  1912.     Report 

on — by  John   McLeish,   B.A. 
f258.     Production  of  coal  and  coke  in  Canada,  during  the  calendar 

year  1912.     Bulletin  on — by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 

266.  Investigation  of  the  peat  bogs  and  peat  industry  of  Canada,  1911  and 
1912.  Bulletin  No.  9— by  A.  v.  Anrep. 

279.  Building  and  ornamental  stones  of  Canada — Vol.  Ill:  Building  and 
ornamental  stones  of  Quebec.  Report  on — by  W.  A.  Parks,  Ph.D. 

281.  The  bituminous  sands  of  Northern  Alberta.  Report  on — by  S.  C. 
Ells,  M.E. 

283.  Mineral  production  of  Canada,  1913.  Preliminary  report  on — by 
John  McLeish,  B.A. 

285.    Summary  report  of  the  Mines  Branch,  1913. 

291.     The  petroleum  and  natural  gas  resources  of  Canada.     Report  on — by 
F.  G.  Clapp,  A.M.,  and  others:—; 
Vol.  I. — Technology  and  Exploitation. 

299.  Peat,  lignite,  and  coal:  their  value  as  fuels  for  the  production  of  gas 
and  power  in  the  by-product  recovery  producer.  Report  on — by 
B.  F.  Haanel,  B.Sc. 

303.  Moose  Mountain  iron-bearing  district.  Report  on — by  E.  Lindeman, 
M.E. 

305.  The  non- metallic  minerals  used  in  the  Canadian  manufacturing  indus- 
tries. Report  on — by  Howells  Frechette,  M.Sc. 

309.     The  physical  properties  of  cobalt,  Part  II.     Report  on— by  H.  T. 

Kalmus,  B.Sc.,  Ph.D. 
320.     The  mineral  production  of  Canada  during  the  calendar  year  1913. 

Annual  report  on — by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 

NOTE. — The  following  parts  were  separately  printed  and  issued  in 
advance  of  the  Annual  Report  for  1913. 

315.  The  production  of  iron  and  steel  during  the  calendar  year 

1913.     Bulletin  on — by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 

316.  The  production  of  coal  and  coke  during  the  calendar  year 

1913.     Bulletin   on — by   John    McLeish,    B.A. 

317.  The  production  of  copper,  gold,  lead,  nickel,  silver,  zinc,  and 
other   metals,   during  the   calendar  year   1913.      Bulletin    on — 

by  C.  T.  Cartwright,   B.Sc. 

t  Publications  marked  thus  t  are  out  of  print. 


318.  The  production  of  cement,  lime,  clay  products,  and  other 
structural  materials,  during  the  calendar  year  1913.    Bul- 
letin on — by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 

319.  General  summary  of  the  mineral  production  of   Canada 
during   the   calendar   year    1913.     Bulletin   on — by   John 
McLeish,  B.A. 

322.  Economic    minerals    and    mining    industries    of    Canada.     (Revised 

Edition). 

323.  The  Products  and  by-producls  of  coal.     Report  on — by  Edgar  Stans- 

field,  M.Sc.,  and  F.  E.  Carter,  B.Sc.,  Dr.  Ing. 

336.     Notes  on  clay  deposits  near  McMurray,  Alberta.     Bulletin  No.  10 — 
by  S.  C.  Ells,  B.A.,  B.Sc. 

The  Division  of  Mineral  Resources  and  Statistics  has  prepared 
the  following  lists  of  mine,  smelter,  and  quarry  operators'  Metal 
mines  and  smelters,  Coal  mines,  Stone  quarry  operators,  Manu- 
facturers of  clay  products,  and  Manufacturers  of  lime;  copies  of  the 
lists  may  be  obtained  on  application. 


IN  THE   PRESS. 

291.     The  petroleum  and  natural  gas  resources  of  Canada.     Report  on — by 
F.  G.  Clapp,  A.M.,  and  others: — 

Vol.  II. — Occurrence  of  petroleum  and  natural  gas  in  Canada. 
Also  separates  of  Vol.  II,  as  follows: — 
Part    I,  Eastern  Canada. 
Part  II,  Western  Canada. 

325.     The  salt  industry  of  Canada.     Report  on — by  L.  H.  Cole,  B.Sc. 

331.     The  investigation  of  six  samples  of  Alberta  lignites.     Report  on — by 
B.  F.  Haanel,  B.Sc.,  and  John  Blizard,  B.Sc. 

334.     Electro-plating  with  cobalt  and  its  alloys.     Report  on — by  H.  T. 
Kalmus,  B.Sc.,  Ph.D. 

338.     Coals  of  Canada:    Vol.  VII.     Weathering  of  Coal.     Report  on— by 
J.  B.  Porter,  E.M.,  D.Sc.,  Ph.D. 

344.     Electrothermic  Smelting  of    Iron  Ores  in   Sweden.     Report  on — by 
Alfred  Stansfield,  D.Sc.,  A.R.S.M.,  F.R.S.C. 


IX. 

FRENCH  TRANSLATIONS. 

f4.  Rapport  de  la  Commission  nominee  pour  etudier  les  divers  precedes 
electro-thermiques  pour  la  reduction  des  minerals  de  fer  et  la 
fabrication  de  1'acier  employes  en  Europe — by  Eugene  Haanel, 
Ph.D.  (French  Edition),  1905. 

26a.     The  mineral  production  of  Canada,   1906.     Annual  report  on — by 
John  McLeish,  B.A. 

f28a.     Summary  report  of  Mines  Branch,  1908. 

56.  Bituminous  or  oil-shales  of  New  Brunswick  and  Nova  Scotia;  also  on 
the  oil-shale  industry  of  Scotland.  Report  on — by  R.  W.  Ells, 
LL.D. 

81.  Chrysotile-asbestos,  its  occurrence,  exploitation,  milling,  and  uses. 
Report  on — by  Fritz  Cirkel,  M.E. 

lOOa.  The  building  and  ornamental  stones  of  Canada:    Building  and  orna- 
mental stones  of  Ontario.     Report  on — by  W.  A.  Parks,  Ph.D. 

149.     Magnetic  iron  sands  of  Natashkwan,  Saguenay  county,  Que.     Report 
on — by  Geo.  C.  Mackenzie,  B.Sc. 

155.  The  utilization  of  peat  fuel  for  the  production  of  power,  being  a  record 

of  experiments  conducted  at  the  Fuel  Testing  Station,  Ottawa, 
1910-11.  Report  on— by  B.  F.  Haanel,  B.Sc. 

156.  The  tungsten  ores  of  Canada.     Report  on— by  T.  L.  Walker,  Ph.D. 

169.     Pyrites  in  Canada:    its  occurrence,  exploitation,  dressing,  and  uses. 
Report  on— by  A.  W.  C.  Wilson,  Ph.D. 

180.     Investigation  of  the  peat  bogs,  and  peat  industry  of  Canada,  1910-11. 
Bulletin  No.  8 — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 

195.  Magnetite  occurrences  along  the  Central  Ontario  railway.  Report  on 

— by  E.  Lindeman,  M.E. 

196.  Investigation  of  the  peat  bogs  and  peat  industry  of  Canada,  1909-10; 

to  which  is  appended  Mr.  Alf.  Larson's  paper  on  Dr.  M.  Eken- 
burg's  wet-carbonizing  process:  from  Teknisk  Tidskrift,  No.  12, 
December  26,  1908 — translation  by  Mr.  A.  v.  Anrep;  also  a  trans- 
lation of  Lieut.  Ekelund's  pamphlet  entitled  "A  solution  of  the 
peat  problem,"  1909,  describing  the  Ekelund  process  for  the  manu- 
facture of  peat  powder,  by  Harold  A.  Leverin,  Ch.E.  Bul- 
letin No.  4— -by  A.  v.  Anrep.  (Second  Edition,  enlarged.) 

197.  Molybdenum  ores  of  Canada.     Report  on — by  T.  L.  Walker,  Ph.D. 

198.  Peat  and  lignite:  their  manufacture  and  uses  in  Europe.     Report  on— 

by  Erik  Nystrom,  M.E.,   1908. 

202.     Graphite:  its  properties,  occurrences,  refining,  and  uses.     Report  on— 
by  Fritz  Cirkel,  M.E.,  1907. 

t  Publications  marked  thus  t  are  out  of  print. 


219.  Austin  Brook  iron-bearing  district.  Report  on — by  E.  Lindeman, 
M.E. 

226.  Chrome  iron  ore  deposits  of  the  Eastern  Townships.  Monograph  on — 
by  Fritz  Cirkel,  M.E.  (Supplementary  section:  Experiments 
with  chromite  at  McGill  University— by  J.  B.  Porter,  E.M.,  D.Sc.) 

231.     Ecomomic  minerals  and  mining  industries  of  Canada. 

233.  Gypsum  deposits  of  the  Maritime  Provinces  of  Canada — including  the 
Magdalen  islands.  Report  on — by  W.  F.  Jennison,  M.E. 

263.  Recent  advances  in  the  construction  of  electric  furnaces  for  the  pro- 

duction of  pig  iron,  steel,  and  zinc.     Bulletin  No.  3 — by  Eugene 
Haanel,  Ph.D. 

264.  Mica:   its  occurrence,  exploitation,  and  uses.     Report  on — by  Hugh 

S.  de  Schmid,  M.E. 

265.  Annual  mineral  production  of  Canada,  1911.     Report  on — by  John 

McLeish,  B.A. 

287.  Production  of  iron  and  steel  in  Canada  during  the  calendar  year  1912. 

Bulletin  on — by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 

288.  Production  of  coal  and  coke  in  Canada,  during  the  calendar  year  1912. 

Bulletin  on — by  John  McLeish,  B.A. 

289.  Production  of  cement,  lime,  clay  products,  stone,  and  other  structural 

materials  during  the  calendar  year  1912.     Bulletin  on — by  John 
McLeish,  B.A. 

290.  Production  of  copper,  gold,  lead,  nickel,  silver,  zinc,  and  other  metals 

of  Canada  during  the  calendar  year  1912.     Bulletin  on — by  C.  T. 
Cartwright,    B.Sc. 

308.     An  investigation  of  the  coals  of  Canada  with  reference  to  their  economic 
qualities:  as  conducted  at  McGill  University  under  the  authority 
of  the   Dominion   Government.     Report   on — by  J.    B.    Porter, 
E.M.,  D.Sc.,  R.  J.  Durley,  Ma.  E.,  and  others— 
Vol.  I — Coal  washing  and  coking  tests. 

IN  THE  PRESS. 

179.  The  nickel  industry:  with  special  reference  to  the  Sudbury  region,  Ont. 
Report  on— by  Professor  A.  P.  Coleman,  Ph.D. 

204.  Building  stones  of  Canada — Vol.  II:  Building  and  ornamental  stones 
of  the  Maritime  Provinces.  Report  on — by  W.  A.  Parks,  Ph.D. 

223.  Lode  Mining  in  the  Yukon:  an  investigation  of  quartz  deposits  in 
the  Klondike  division.  Report  on— by  T.  A.  MacLean,  B.Sc. 

246.  Gypsum  in  Canada:  its  occurrence,  exploitation,  and  technology. 
Report  on— by  L.  H.  Cole,  B.Sc. 


308.     An  investigation  of  the  coals  of  Canada  with  reference  to  their  economic 
qualities:  as  conducted  at  McGill  University  under  the  authority 
of  the  Dominion  Government.     Report  on — by  J.  B.  Porter,  E.M., 
D.Sc.,  R.  J.  Durley,  Ma.E.,  and  others — 
Vol.      1 1 — Boiler  and  gas  producer  tests. 
Vol.    Ill- 
Appendix  I 

Coal  washing  tests  and  diagrams. 
Vol.  IV— 
Appendix  II 

Boiler  tests  and  diagrams. 

314.     Iron  ore  deposits,  Bristol  mine,  Pontiac  county,  Quebec,  Report  on — 
by  E.  Lindeman,  M.E. 


MAPS. 

|6.  Magnetometric  survey,  vertical  intensity:  Calabogie  mine,  Bagot 
township,  Renfrew  county,  Ontario — by  E.  Nystrom,  1904. 
Scale  60  feet  to  1  inch.  Summary  report  1905.  (See  Map  No. 
249.) 

t!3.  Magnetometric  survey  of  the  Belmont  iron  mines,  Belmont  township, 
Peterborough  county,  Ontario — by  B.  F.  Haanel,  1905.  Scale 
60  feet  to  1  inch.  Summary  report,  1905.  (See  Map  No.  186.) 

f!4.  Magnetometric  survey  of  the  Wilbur  mine,  Lavant  township,  Lanark 
county,  Ontario — by  B.  F.  Haanel,  1905.  Scale  60  feet  to  1  inch. 
Summary  report,  1905. 

f33.  Magnetometric  survey,  vertical  intensity:  lot  1,  concession  VI,  Mayo 
township,  Hastings  county,  Ontario — by  Howellts  Frechette,  1909. 
Scale  60  feet  to  1  inch.  (See  Maps  Nos.  191  and  19lA.) 

|34.  Magnetometric  survey^  vertical  intensity:  lots  2  and  3,  concession 
VI,  Mayo  township,  Hastings  county,  Ontario — by  Howells 
Frechette,  1909.  Scale  60  feet  to  1  inch.  (See  Maps  Nos.  191 
and  191  A.) 

f35.  Magnetometric  survey,  vertical  intensity:  lots  10,  11,  and  12,  con- 
cession IX,  and  lots  11  and  12,  concession  VIII,  Mayo  township, 
Hastings  county,  Ontario — by  Howells  Frechette,  1909.  Scale 
60  feet  to  1  inch.  (See  Maps  Nos.  191  and  19lA.) 

*36.  Survey  of  Mer  Bleue  peat  bog,  Gloucester  township,  Carleton  county, 
and  Cumberland  township,  Russell  county,  Ontario — by  Erik 
Nystrom,  and  A.  v.  Anrep.  (Accompanying  report  No.  30.) 

*37.  Survey  of  Alfred  peat  bog,  Alfred  and  Caledonia  townships,  Prescott 
county,  Ontario — by  Erik  Nystrom  and  A.  v.  Anrep.  (Accom- 
panying report  No.  30.) 

*38.  Survey  of  Welland  peat  bog,  Wainfleet  and  Humberstone  townships, 
Welland  county,  Ontario — by  Erik  Nystrom  and  A.  v.  Anrep. 
(Accompanying  report  No.  30.) 

*39.     Survey  of  Newington  peat  bog,  Osnabruck,  Roxborough,  and  Cornwall 

townships,  Stormont  county,  Ontario — by  Erik  Nystrom  and  A. 

v.  Anrep.     (Accompanying  report  No.  30.         ) 
*40.     Survey  of  Perth  peat  bog,   Drummond  township,   Lanark  county, 

Ontario — by  Erik  Nystrom  and  A.  v.  Anrep.     (Accompanying 

report  No.  30.) 

f41.  Survey  of  Victoria  Road  peat  bog,  Bexley  and  Garden  townships, 
Victoria  county,  Ontario — by  Erik  Nystrom  and  A.  v.  Anrep. 
(Accompanying  report  No.  30.) 

*48.  Magnetometric  survey  of  Iron  Crown  claim  at  Nimpkish  (Klaanch) 
river,  Vancouver  island,  B.C. — by  E.  Lindeman.  Scale  60  feet 
to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  47.) 

Note. — 1.    Maps  marked  thus  *  are  to  be  found  only  in  reports. 

2.    Maps  marked  thus  f  have  been  printed  independently  of  reports,  hence  can 
be  procured  separately  by  applicants. 


*49.  Magnetometric  survey  of  Western  Steel  Iron  claim,  at  Sechart, 
Vancouver  island,  B.C. — By  E.  Lindeman.  Scale  60  feet  to  1  inch. 
(Accompanying  report  No.  47). 

*53.  Iron  ore  occurrences,  Ottawa  and  Pontiac  counties,  Quebec,  1908 — by 
J.  White  and  Fritz  Cirkel.  (Accompanying  report  No.  23.) 

*54.  Iron  ore  occrurences,  Argenteuil  county,  Quebec,  1908 — by  Fritz 
Cirkel.  (Accompanying  report  No.  23.)  (Out  of  print.) 

*57.  The  productive  chrome  iron  ore  district  of  Quebec — by  Fritz  Cirkel. 
(Accompanying  report  No.  29.) 

t60.  Magnetometric  survey  of  the  Bristol  mine,  Pontiac  county,  Quebec — 
by  E.  Lindeman.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying 
report  No.  67.) 

graphical  map  of  Bristal  mine,  Pontiac  county,  Quebec — by  E. 
Lindeman.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report 
No.  67.) 

(Accom- 
panying 
report 
No.  84.) 


f64.     Index  map  of  Nova  Scotia :  Gypsum — by  W.  F.  Jennison. 
f65.     Index  map  of  New  Brunswick:  Gypsum — by  W.  F.  Jenni- 


son. 


f66.     Map  of  Magdalen  islands:  Gypsum — by  W.  F.  Jennison. 

f70.  Magnetometric  survey  of  Northeast  Arm  iron  range,  Lake  Timagami, 
Nipissing  district,  Ontario — by  E.  Lindeman.  Scale  200  feet  to  1 
inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  63.) 


f72.     Brunner  peat  bog,  Ontario — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 
f73.     Komako  peat  bog,  Ontario — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 


(Accom- 
panying 
report 
,  No.  71.) 
f74.     Brockville  peat  bog,  Ontario — by  A.  v.  Anrep 


f75.     Rondeau  peat  bog,  Ontario — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 


(Out  of 


print.) 
f76.     Alfred  peat  bog,  Ontario — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 

f77.     Alfred  peat  bog,  Ontario:  main  ditch  profile — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 

f78.     Map  of  asbestos  region,  Province  of  Quebec,  1910 — by  Fritz  Cirkel. 
Scale  1  mile  to  1  inch.     (Accompanying  report  No.  69.) 

f94.     Map  showing  Cobalt,  Gowganda,  Shiningtree,  and  Porcupine  districts 
— by  L.  H.  Cole.     (Accompanying  Summary  report,  1910.) 

f95.     General  map  of  Canada,  showing  coal  fields.     (Accompanying  report 
No.  83— by  Dr.  J.  B.  Porter.) 

f96.     General  map  of  coal  fields  of  Nova  Scotia  and  New  Brunswick.    (Ac- 
companying report  No.  83 — By  Dr.  J.  B.  Porter.) 

f97.     General   map   showing   coal    fields   in   Alberta,    Saskatchewan,   and 
Manitoba.     (Accompanying  report  No.  83 — by  Dr.  J.  B.  Porter). 

Note. — 1.     Maps  marked  thus  *  are  to  be  found  only  in  reports. 

2.    Maps  marked  thus  t  have  been  printed  independently  of  reports,  hence  can 
be  procured  separately  by  applicants. 


t98.     General  map  of  coal  fields  in  British  Columbia.     Accompanying  report 
No.  83— by  Dr.  J.  B.  Porter.) 

t99.     General  map  of  coal  field  in  Yukon  Territory.     (Accompanying  report 
No.  83— by  Dr.  J.  B.  Porter.) 

fl06.  Geological  map  of  Austin  Brook  iron  bearing  district,  Bathurst  town- 
ship, Gloucester  county,  N.B. — by  E.  Lindeman.  Scale  400  feet 
to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  105.) 

f!07.  Magnetometric  survey,  vertical  intensity:  Austin  Brook  iron  bearing 
district — by  E.  Lindeman.  Scale  400  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accom- 
panying report  No.  105.) 

f!08.  Index  map  showing  iron  bearing  area  at  Austin  Brook — by  E.  Linde- 
man. (Accompanying  report  No.  105.) 

*112.  Sketch  plan  showing  geology  of  Point  Mamainse,  Ont. — by  Professor 
A.  C.  Lane.  Scale  4,00'0  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report 
No.  111.) 

fll3.  Holland  peat  bog  Ontario — by  A.  v.  Anrep.  (Accompanying  report 
No.  151.) 

*1 19-137.  Mica:  township  maps,  Ontario  and  Quebec — by  Hugh  S.  de 
Schmid.  (Accompanying  report  No.  118.) 

J138.  Mica:  showing  location  of  principal  mines  and  occurrences  in  the 
Quebec  mica  area — by  Hugh  S.  de  Schmid.  Scale  3-95  miles  to 
1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  118.) 

f!39.  Mica:  showing  location  of  principal  mines  and  occurrences  in  the 
Ontario  mica  area — by  Hugh  S.  de  Schmid.  Scale  3-95  miles  to 
1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  118.) 

1 140.  Mica:  showing  distribution  of  the  principal  mica  occurrences  in  the 
Dominion  of  Canada — by  Hugh  S.  de  Schmid.  Scale  3-95  miles 
to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  118.) 

fl41.  Torbrook  iron  bearing  district,  Annapolis  county,  N.S. — by  Howells 
Frechette.  Scale  400  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report 
No.  110). 

fl46.  Distribution  of  iron  ore  sands  of  the  iron  ore  deposits  on  the  north 
shore  of  the  River  and  Gulf  of  St.  Lawrence,  Canada — by  Geo.  C. 
Mackenzie.  Scale  100  miles  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report 
No.  145.) 

t!47.  Magnetic  iron  sand  deposits  in  relation  to  Natashkwan  harbour  and 
Great  Natashkwan  river,  Que.  (Index  Map) — by  Geo.  C.  Mac- 
kenzie. Scale  40  chains  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No. 

f!48.  Natashkwan  magnetic  iron  sand  deposits,  Saguenay  county,  Que. — 
by  Geo.  C.  Mackenzie.  Scale  1,000  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accom- 
panying report  No.  145.) 

Note. — 1.     Maps  marked  thus  *  are  to  be  found  only  in  reports. 

2.     Maps  marked  thus  t  have  been  printed  independently  of  reports,  hence  can 
be  procured  separately  by  applicants. 


f!52. 
t!53. 

f!57. 
f!58. 
J159. 
f!60. 
f!61. 
t!62. 
f!63. 
f!64. 
*165. 
f!66. 

f!68. 

t!71. 

f!72. 
t!73. 
f!74. 
t!7S. 

f!76. 
f!77. 
t!78. 


(Accom- 
panying 
report 
No. 
151.) 


Map  showing  the  location  of  peat  bogs  investigated  in 
Ontario — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 

Map  showing  the  location  of  peat  bog  as  investigated  in 
Manitoba — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 

Lac  du  Bonnet  peat  bog,  Manitoba — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 
Transmission  peat  bog,  Manitoba — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 
Corduroy  peat  bog,  Manitoba — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 
Boggy  Creek  peat  bog,  Manitoba — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 
Rice  Lake  peat  bog,  Manitoba — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 
Mud  Lake  peat  bog,  Manitoba — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 
Litter  peat  bog,  Manitoba — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 
Julius  peat  litter  bog,  Manitoba — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 
Fort  Francis  peat  bog,  Ontario — by  A.  v.  Anrep. 

Magnetometric  map  of  No.  3  mine,  lot  7,  concessions  V  and  VI, 
McKim  township,  Sudbury  district,  Ont. — by  E.  Lindeman. 
(Accompanying  Summary  report,  1911.) 

Map  showing  pyrites  mines  and  prospects  in  Eastern  Canada,  and 
their  relation  to  the  United  States  market — by  A.  W.  G.  Wilson. 
Scale  125  miles  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  167.) 

Geological  map  of  Sudbury  nickel  region,  Ont. — by  Prof.  A.  P.  Cole- 
man.  Scale  1  mine  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  170.) 


Geological  map  of  Victoria  mine — by  Prof.  A.  P.  Coleman. 
*  Crean  Hill  mine — by  Prof.  A.  P.  Coleman 

"  Creighton  mine — by  Prof.  A.  P.  Coleman. 


(Accom- 
panying 
report 
No. 
170.) 


showing  contact  of  norite  and  Laurentian  in  vicinity 
of   Creighton   mine — by   Prof.  A.   P.   Coleman. 
(Accompanying  report  No.  170.) 

*  Copper  Cliff  offset— by  Prof.  A.  P.  Coleman.    (Ac- 

companying report  No.  170.) 

No.   3   mine — by   Prof.  A.   P.   Coleman.     (Accom- 
panying report  No.  170.) 

"  showing  vicinity  of  Stobie  and   No.  3   mines — by 

Prof.    A.    P.    Coleman.     (Accompanying    report 
No.  170.) 

Note.— 1 .     Maps  marked  thus  *  are  to  be  found  only  in  reports. 

2.     Maps  marked  thus  t  have  been  printed  independently  of  reports,  hence  can 
be  procured  separately  by  applicants. 


fl85.  Magnetometric  survey,  vertical  intensity:  Blairton  iron  mine,  Bel- 
mont  township,  Peterborough  county,  Ontario — by  E.  Lindeman, 
1911.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

flSSa.  Geological  map,  Blairton  iron  mine,  Belmont  township,  Peterborough 
county,  Ontario — by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch. 
(Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

f!86.  Magnetometric  survey,  Belmont  iron  mine,  Belmont  township,  Peter- 
borough county,  Ontario^-by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  Scale  200  feet 
to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

|186a.  Geological  map,  Belmont  iron  mine,  Belmont  township,  Peterborough 
county,  Ontario — by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch. 
(Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

fl87.  Magnetometric  survey,  vertical  intensity:  St.  Charles  mine,  Tudor 
township,  Hastings  county,  Ontario-^-by  E.  Lindeman,  1911. 
Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

f!87a.  Geological  map,  St.  Charles  mine,  Tudor  township,  Hastings  county, 
Ontario-j-by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Ac- 
companying report  No.  184.  ) 

f!88.  Magnetometric  survey,  vertical  intensity:  Baker  mine,  Tudor  town- 
ship, Hastings  county,  Ontario-^-by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  Scale 
200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

f!88a.  Geological  map,  Baker  mine,  Tudor  township,  Hastings  county, 
Ontario-^by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Ac- 
companying report  No.  184.) 

t!89.  Magnetometric  survey,  vertical  intensity:  Ridge  iron  ore  deposits' 
Wollaston  township,  Hastings  county,  Ontario — by  E.  Lindeman, 
1911.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

f!90.  Magnetometric  survey,  vertical  intensity:  Coehill  and  Jenkins  mines, 
Wollaston  township,  Hastings  county,  Ontario — by  E.  Lindeman, 
1911.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

f!90a.  Geological  map,  Coehill  and  Jenkins  mines,  Wollaston  township, 
Hastings  county,  Ontario — by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  Scale  200 
feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

f!91.  Magnetometric  survey,  vertical  intensity:  Bessemer  iron  ore  deposits, 
Mayo  township,  Hastings  county,  Ontario — by  E.  Lindeman, 
1911.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

f!91a.  Geological  map,  Bessemer  iron  ore  deposits,  Mayo  township,  Hastings 
county,  Ontario— by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch. 
(Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

f!92.  Magnetometric  survey,  vertical  intensity:  Rankin,  Childs,  and 
Stevens  mines,  Mayo  township,  Hastings  county,  Ontario — by  E. 
Lindeman,  1911.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying 
report  No.  194.) 

Note. — 1.    Maps  marked  thus  *  are  to  be  found  only  in  reports. 

2.     Maps  marked  thus  t  have  been  printed  independently  of  reports,  hence  can 
be  procured  separately  by  applicants. 


xvii 

fl92a.  Geological  map,  Rankin,  Childs,  and  Stevens  mines,  Mayo  township, 
Hastings  county,  Ontario — by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  Scale  200 
feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

f!93.  Magnetometric  survey  vertical  intensity:  Kennedy  property,  Carlow 
township,  Hastings  county,  Ontario^— by  E.  Lindeman,  1911. 
Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

f!93a.  Geological  map,  Kennedy  property,  Carlow  township,  Hastings 
county,  Ontario — by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch. 
(Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

f!94.  Magnetometric  survey,  vertical  intensity:  Bow  Lake  iron  ore  occur- 
rences, Faraday  township,  Hastings  county,  Ontario-^— by  E.  Linde- 
man, 1911.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No. 
184.) 

f204.  Index  map,  magnetite  occurrences  along  the  Central  Ontario  railway — 
by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  (Accompanying  report  No.  184.) 

f205.  Magnetometric  map,  Moose  Mountain  iron-bearing  district,  Sudbury 
district,  Ontario:  Deposits  Nos.  1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  and  7 — by  E. 
Lindeman,  1911.  (Accompanying  report  No.  303.) 

f205a.  Geological  map,  Moose  Mountain  iron-bearing  district,  Sudbury 
district,  Ontario,  Deposits  Nos.  1,  2,  3,  4,  5,  6,  and  7 — by  E.  Linde- 
man. (Accompanying  report  No.  303.) 

f206.  Magnetometric  survey  of  Moose  Mountain  iron-bearing  district, 
Sudbury  district,  Ontario:  northern  part  of  deposit  No.  2 — by  E. 
Lindeman,  1912.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying 
report  No.  303.) 

f207.  Magnetometric  survey  of  Moose  Mountain  iron-bearing  district,  Sud- 
bury district,  Ontario:  Deposits  Nos.  8,  9,  and  9 A — by  E.  Linde- 
man, 1912.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report 
No.  303.) 

f208.  Magnetometric  survey  of  Moose  Mountain  iron-bearing  district, 
Sudbury  district,  Ontario:  Deposit  No.  10 — by  E.  Lindeman, 
1912.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  303.) 

f208a.  Magnetometric  survey,  Moose  Mountain  iron-bearing  district,  Sud- 
bury district,  Ontario:  eastern  portion  of  Deposit  No.  11 — by  E. 
Lindeman,  1912.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying 
report  No.  303.) 

f208b.  Magnetometric  survey,  Moose  Mountain  iron-bearing  district,  Sud- 
bury district,  Ontario:  western  portion  of  deposit  No.  11 — by  E. 
Lindeman,  1912.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report 
No.  303.) 

|208c.  General  geological  map,  Moose  Mountain  iron-bearing  district, 
Sudbury  district,  Ontario — by  E.  Lindeman,  1912.  Scale  800 
feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  303.) 

Note. — 1.     Maps  marked  thus  *  are  to  be  found  only  In  reports. 

2.     Maps  marked  thus  t  have  been  printed  independently  of  reports,  hence  can 
be  procured  separately  by  applicants. 


xviii 

f210.  Location  of  copper  smelters  in  Canada — by  A.  W.  G.  Wilson.  Scale 
197-3  miles  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  209.) 

f215.  Province  of  Alberta:  showing  properties  from  which  samples  of  coal 
were  taken  for  gas  producer  tests,  Fuel  Testing  Division,  Ottawa. 
(Accompanying  Summary  report,  1912.) 

f220.  Mining  districts,  Yukon.  Scale  35  miles  to  1  inch — by  T.  A.  MacLean 
(Accompanying  report  No.  222.) 

f221.  Dawson  mining  district,  Yukon,  Scale  2  miles  to  1  inch — by  T.  A. 
MacLean.  (Accompanying  report  No.  222.) 

*228.  Index  map  of  the  Sydney  coal  Eelds,  Cape  Breton,  N.S.  (Accom- 
panying report  No.  227.) 

|232.  Mineral  map  of  Canada.  Scale  100  miles  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying 
report  No.  230.) 

f239.  Index  map  of  Canada  showing  gypsum  occurrences.  (Accompanying 
report  No.  245.) 

f240.  Map  showing  Lower  Carboniferous  formation  in  which  gypsum 
occurs  in  the  Maritime  provinces.  Scale  100  miles  to  1  inch. 
(Accompanying  report  No.  345.) 

f241.  Map  showing  relation  of  gypsum  deposits  in  Northern  Ontario  to  rail- 
way lines.  Scale  100  miles  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report 
No.  245.) 

f242.  Map,  Grand  River  gypsum  deposits,  Ontario.  Scale  4  miles  to  1  inch. 
(Accompanying  report  No.  245.) 

f243.  Plan  of  Manitoba  Gypsum  Co.'s  properties.  (Accompanying  report 
No.  245.) 

f244.  Map  showing  relation  of  gypsum  deposits  in  British  Columbia  to 
railway  lines  and  market.  Scale  35  miles  to  1  inch.  (Accompany- 
ing report  No.  245.) 

f249.  Magnetometric  survey,  Caldwell  and  Campbell  mines,  Calabogie 
district,  Renfrew  county,  Ontario — by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  Scale 
200  feet  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  254.) 

f250.  Magnetometric  survey,  Black  Bay  or  Williams  mine,  Calabogie  district, 
Renfrew  county,  Ontario— by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  Scale  200  feet 
to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  254.) 

f251.  Magnetometric  survey,  Bluff  Point  iron  mine,  Calabogie  district, 
Renfrew  county,  Ontario^— by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  Scale  200  feet 
to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  254.) 

f252.  Magnetometric  survey,  Culhane  mine,  Calabogie  district,  Renfrew 
county,  Ontario— by  E.  Lindeman,  191 1.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch. 
(Accompanying  report  No.  254.) 

Note. — 1.     Maps  marked  thus  *  are  to  be  found  only  in  reports. 

2.     Maps  marked  thus  t  have  been  printed  independently  of  reports,  hence  can 
be  procured  separately  by  applicants. 


f253.  Magnetometric  survey,  Martel  or  Wilson  iron  mine,  Calabogie  district, 
Renfrew  county,  Ontario — by  E.  Lindeman,  1911.  Scale  200  feet 
to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  254.) 

f261.  Magnetometric  survey,  Northeast  Arm  iron  range,  lot  339  E.T.W. 
Lake  Timagami,  Nipissing  district,  Ontario — by  E.  Nystrom. 
1903.  Scale  200  feet  to  1  inch. 

f268.  Map  of  peat  bol  s  investigated  in  Quebec — by  A.v.  Anrep,  1912. 

f269.  Large  Tea  Field  peat  bog,  Quebec  "  * 

f270.  Small  Tea  Field  peat  bog,  Quebec 

f271.  Lanoraie  peat  bog,  Quebec  *  " 

f272.  St.  Hyacinthe  peat  bog,  Quebec  *  " 

f273.  Rivere  du  Loup  peat  bog  " 

f274.  Cacouna  peat  bog  "  " 

f275.  Le  Pare  peat  bog,  Qebec  *  * 

t276.  St.  Denis  peat  bog,  Quebec  *  « 

f277.  Riviere  Ouelle  peat  bog,  Quebec  *  " 

f278.  Moose  Mountain  peat  bog,  Quebec  "  " 

f284.  Map  of  northern  portion  of  Alberta,  showing  position  of  outcrops  of 
bituminous  sand.  Scale  12J  miles  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying 
report  No.  281.) 

f293.  Map  of  Dominion  of  Canada,  showing  the  occurrences  of  oil,  gas,  and 
tar  sands.  Scale  197  miles  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report 
No.  291.) 

|294.  Reconnaissance  map  of  part  of  Albert  and  Westmorland  counties 
New  Brunswick.  Scale  1  mile  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report 
No.  291.) 

f295.  Sketch  plan  of  Gaspe  oil  fields,  Quebec,  showing  location  of  wells. 
Scale  2  rifles  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  291.) 

f296.  Map  showing  gas  and  oil  fields  and  pipe-lines  in  southwestern  Ontario. 
Scale  4  miles  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  291.) 

f297.  Geological  map  of  Alberta,  Saskatchewan,  and  Manitoba.  Scale  35 
miles  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  291.) 

f298.  Map,  geology  of  the  forty-ninth  parallel,  0-9864  miles  to  1  inch. 
(Accompanying  report  No.  291.) 

f302.  Map  showing  location  of  main  gas  line,  Bow  Island,  Calgary.  Scale 
12$  miles  to  1  inch.  (Accompanying  report  No.  291.) 

Note. — 1.     Maps  marked  thus  *  are  to  be  found  only  in  reports. 

2.     Maps  marked  thus  t  have  been  printed  independently  of  reports,  hence  can 
be  procured  separately  by  applicants. 


f311.  Magnetometric  map,  McPherson  mine,  Barachois,  Cape  Breton 
county,  Nova  Scotia — by  A.  H.  A.  Robinson,  1913.  Scale  200 
feet  to  1  inch. 

f312.  Magnetometric  map,  iron  ore  deposits  at  Upper  Glencoe,  Inverness 
county,  Nova  Scotia— by  E.  Lindeman,  1913.  Scale  200  feet  to 
1  inch. 

f313.  Magnetometric  map,  iron  ore  deposits  at  Grand  Mira,  Cape  Breton 
county,  Nova  Scotia — by  A.  H.  A.  Robinson,  1913.  Scale  200 
feet  to  1  inch. 


Address  all  communications  to — 

DIRECTOR  MINES  BRANCH, 
DEPARTMENT  OF  MINES, 

SUSSEX    STREET,    OTTAWA. 

Note. — 1.     Maps  marked  thus  *  are  to  be  found  only  in  reports. 

2.     Maps  marked  thus  t  have  been  printed  independently  of  reports,  hence  can 
be  procured  separately  by  applicants. 


57 


UNIVERSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA  AT  LOS  ANGELES 

THE  UNIVERSITY  LIBRARY 
This  book  is  DUE  on  the  last  date  stamped  below 


JAN  7-  974 
JAN  34  1374. 


RECT 


ID    JAH131 

JAN  1 


JAN  121 

RECD 


FormL-9 
10»l-3,'39(7752) 


T/i 


L  006  387  104  0 


UC  SOUTHERN  REGIONAL  LIBRARY  FACILITY 


AA    001  036  985    8