(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Open Source Books | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

Anonymous User (login or join us)Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Properties of matter"

LIBRARY 



UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. 



Class 



UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 

LIBRARY 

OF THE 

.DEPARTMENT Of PI IYOIOO - 

p . . NOV 14 19-11 

, Received .. 

Accessions No. (&./.%.. Book No. L2... 



PROPERTIES OF MATTER 



BY THE SAME AUTHOR. 

LIGHT. 

Third Edition. In crown 8vo, cloth, price 7s. 6cL 

DYNAMICS. 

In crown 8vo, cloth, price 7s. 6d. 



NEWTON'S LAWS OF MOTION. 

In crown 8vo, cloth, price Is. 6d. net 



PROPERTIES OF MATTER 



P. G. TAIT, M.A., SEC. R.S.E. 

HONORARY FELLOW OF ST. PKTKR'S COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE, 

PROFESSOR OP NATURAL PHILOSOPHY IN THE 

UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH 



FIFTH EDITION 

EDITED BY 

W. PEDDIE, D.Sc., F.R.S.E. 

HARRIS PROFESSOR OF PHYSIOS IN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, DUNDER, 
UNIVERSITY OF ST. ANDREWS 



LONDON 
ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK 

1907 



T3 



First Edition published April, 1885 ; 

Second Edition, October, 1890 ; Third Edition, June, 1894 ; 
Fourth Edition, November, 1899 ; Fifth Edition, July, 1907. 



The Right of Translation and Reproduction is Reserved 



PREFACE. 



IT is desirable that a work so characteristic as this is 
should remain, in a new edition, as far as possible in the 
form in which it left the hands of its distinguished 
author. The rapid advance of physical science, in the 
few years which have passed since the last edition 
appeared, has necessitated some slight additions. In 
making these, the original plan of the book has been 
strictly adhered to, and all additions have been placed 
within brackets and initialed. 

The work of revision has been a pleasure to me, as a 
service gladly rendered to the memory of my former 
master and friend. 

W. PEDDIE. 

UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, DUNDEE, 
June 3, 1907. 



222568 



PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. 



THE subject of this elementary work still forms in 
accordance with tradition from the days of Eobison, 
Playfair, Leslie, and Forbes the introduction to the 
course of Natural Philosophy in Edinburgh University. 

The work is (with the exception of a few isolated 
sections) intended for the average student ; who is sup- 
posed to have a sound knowledge of ordinary Geometry, 
and a moderate acquaintance with the elements of 
Algebra and of Trigonometry. 

But he is also supposed to have what he can easily 
obtain from the simpler parts of the two first chapters of 
Thomson and Tait's Elements of Natural Philosophy, or 
from Clerk-Maxwell's excellent little treatise on Matter 
and Motion a general acquaintance with the fundamental 
principles of Kinematics of a Point and of Kinetics of 
a Particle. To have treated these subjects at greater 
length than has here been attempted would have rendered 
it imperative to omit much of the development of im- 
portant parts of preliminary Physics, of which, so far as 
I know, there is no modern British text-book. The 
work was peremptorily limited to a small volume; so 
that the parts of these auxiliary subjects which have 



viii PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. 

been admitted are mainly of two kinds : those which 
are really introductory to the books just mentioned, 
because treating of matters' usually deemed too simple 
for special notice ; and a few which are in a sense sup- 
plementary, because giving valuable results not usually 
included in elementary books. 

It is my present intention to complete my series of 
text-books by similar volumes on Dynamics, Sound, and 
Electricity. Should I succeed in bringing out such 
works, I shall thenceforth be enabled to introduce 
references to one or other, instead of the digressions 
which are absolutely necessary in every self-contained 
elementary treatise devoted to one special branch of 
Physics only. 

P. G. TAIT. 

COLLEGE, EDINBURGH, 
March 5, 1885. 



PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. 



LN the present edition this Treatise has been carefully 
revised and considerably extended : special attention 
having been paid to passages where a difficulty had 
been found. 

For one of the most important additions I am indebted 
to M. Amagat, who has very kindly enabled me to avail 
myself of some of his splendid but hitherto unpublished 
results. These relate to the compression of fluids exposed 
to enormous pressures ; and, when published entire, will 
form a singularly interesting and practically new branch 
jf the subject. 

To some of the scientific critics of the first edition I 
am indebted for suggestions of real value, and I have 
endeavoured to profit by them. I must except, however, 
those which concern my treatment of the subject of Force. 
I have seen so much mischief done by this quasi-personi- 
fication of a mere sense -impression that, even in an 
elementary book, I am constrained to protest against it. 
(See 15 of the text.) I feel assured that the difficulties 
which are now everywhere felt as to the great scientific 
question of the day, the nature of what we call electricity, 
ire in great part due to the way in which our modes of 



x PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. 

thinking have been, by early training and subsequent 
habit, encouraged to run in this fatal groove. 

To some of my other critics, more aggressive because 
less scientific, I have been indebted for genuine amuse- 
ment. Nothing is, however, without its use in this 
world, though it may occasionally be difficult to discover 
that use. It would seem, then, that the function of the 
unscientific critics of a scientific book is (like that of the 
writers of slipshod English) to furnish examiners with 
rich material for questions of the well-known kind : 
"Point out all the errors in the following passage." 
Nothing is more difficult than the attempt to make such 
passages : and the results are usually forced and awkward. 
From the critics I allude to they come in perfection. 

There is one additional remark which I must make. 
The majority of the illustrations in this work (whether 
given in words or by diagrams) are, when the contrary is 
not stated, to the best of my knowledge original. I make 
the remark lest I should be supposed to have taken them 
from some of the books in which they have been re- 
produced without acknowledgment of their source. It is 
flattering to have one's work thus appreciated, but the 
honour has its little inconveniences. 



P. G. TAIT. 



COLLEGE, EDINBURGH, 
July 1, 1890. 



PREFACE TO THE THIRD EDITION. 



IN spite of what I must still consider a tolerably com- 
plete statement of my position ( 11-15, 108, etc.), some 
of my critics persist in accusing me of deliberate incon- 
sistency in my treatment of Force. I am represented by 
them as first telling my readers that there is "no such 
thing as Force," and then introducing utter confusion by 
the assertion that "Matter is merely the plaything of 
Force" ! They appear to be unable to perceive that the 
idea of Force is an essential feature of Newton's Laws of 
Motion : and that, until we are provided with an effi- 
cient substitute for Newton's system, we must retain it 
in its integrity. To have left these statements altogether 
unnoticed might have been prejudicial to the book itself, 
in the eyes of the many weak ones who regard the dicta of 
a critic (especially when he is anonymous) as necessarily 
authoritative. To take more than this passing notice of 
them would be to exaggerate their importance. 

Since the last edition of this book was published, the 
whole of M. Amagat's splendid experimental results have 
become generally accessible : and I have made consider- 
able additional use of them, especially in Chaps. IX. 
andX. 

Parts of Chap. VIII. have been considerably modified, 



xiv PREFACE. 

and VI. of this work may be referred to a little pam- 
phlet on Newton' 's Laws of Motion, which has just been 
issued by the same publishers. In it I have discussed, 
though with studied conciseness, a good deal of important 
matter which the plan of this volume prevented me from 
introducing. 

The present issue has been kept up to date, so far as 
recent real extensions of the subjects it treats of are con- 
cerned. Other engrossing work has (happily ?) rendered 
impracticable for the moment a scheme which I had con- 
templated for a thorough revision of the whole plan of the 
volume. 

P. G. TAIT. 

COLLEGE, EDINBURGH, 
September 19, 1899. 



CONTENTS. 



CHAPTER I. 

PAG* 

INTRODUCTORY . . . . . ' . 1 

CHAPTER II. 

SOME HYPOTHESES AS TO THE ULTIMATE STRUCTURE OF 

MATTER ...... 18 

CHAPTER III. 

EXAMPLES OF TERMS IN COMMON USE AS APPLIED TO 

MATTER ...... 25 

CHAPTER IV. 
TIME AND SPACE . . . ... 48 

CHAPTER V. 
IMPENETRABILITY, POROSITY, DIVISIBILITY . . 83 

CHAPTER VI. 
INERTIA, MOBILITY, CENTRIFUGAL FORCE . . 94 

CHAPTER VII. 

GRAVITATION . . . . . .113 

CHAPTER VIII. 
PRELIMINARY TO DEFORMABILITY AND ELASTICITY . 146 



xvi CONTENTS. 

CHAPTER IX. 

PAGE 

COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS . . 161 

CHAPTER X. 

COMPRESSION OF LIQUIDS . . . . .188 

CHAPTER XI. 
COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS . . 205 

CHAPTER XII. 
COHESION AND CAPILLARITY .... 242 

CHAPTER XIII. 

DIFFUSION, OSMOSE, TRANSPIRATION, VISCOSITY, ETC. . 275 

CHAPTER XIV. 

AGGREGATION OF PARTICLES . . . 296 

CHAPTER XV. 
DISINTEGRATION OF THE ATOM . . . .311 

APPENDIX. 
I. HYPOTHESES AS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF MATTER. 

BY PROFESSOR FLINT, D.D. . . .316 

II. EXTRACTS FROM CLERK-MAXWELL'S ARTICLE "ATOM" 320 

III. VITRUVIUS ON ARCHIMEDES' EXPERIMENT . . 335 

IV* NOTE ON A SINGULAR PASSAGE IN THE " PRINCIPIA " 336 

V. EXTRACT FROM LA IIMOR'S "AETHER AND MATTER" 344 

VI. EXTRACT FROM KELVIN'S "BALTIMORE LECTURES" 346 

INDEX 350 



PKOPEKTIES OF MATTEE. 



CHAPTER I. 

INTRODUCTORY. 

1. WE start with certain assumptions or AXIOMS, which 
are by no means of an a priori character, having been 
forced upon us by the observations and experiments of 
many generations : 

(1) The physical universe has an objective existence. 

(2) We become cognisant of it solely by the aid of our 

Senses. 

(3) The indications of the Senses are always imperfect, 

and often misleading ; but 

(4) The patient exercise of Reason enables us to control 

these indications, and gradually, but surely, to 
sift truth from falsehood. 

2. If, for a moment, we use the word Thing to denote, 
generally, whatever we are constrained to allow has 
objective existence : i.e. exists altogether independently 
of our senses and of our reason : we arrive at the follow- 
ing conclusions : 

A. In the physical universe there are but two classes 
of things, MATTER and ENERGY. 

A 



2 ' PROPERTY "o 

B. TIME and SPACE, though well known to all (in 
Newton's words, omnibus not!ssima\ are not things. 1 

C. NUMBER, MAGNITUDE, POSITION, VELOCITY, etc., are 
likewise not things. 

D. CONSCIOUSNESS, VOLITION, eetu, are not physical. 

3. So says modern physical science, and to its generally 
received statements we cannot but adhere. 

Metaphysicians, of course, who trust entirely to so- 
called " light of nature," have their own views on this, 
as on all other subjects ; but the number and variety of 
these views, some of which are entirely incompatible 
with others, form a striking contrast to the general con- 
sensus of opinion on the part of those who have at least 
tried to deserve to know. 

In the words of v. Helmholtz, 2 one of the chief modern 
authorities in science properly so-called : 

"The genuine metaphysician, in view of a presumed 
necessity of thought, looks down with an air of superiority 
on those who labour to investigate the facts. Has it 
already been forgotten how much mischief this procedure 

1 " Space is . . . regarded as a condition of the possibility of 
phenpmena, not as a determination produced by them ; it is a 
representation d. priori which necessarily precedes all external 
phenomena : " 

"Time is not an empirical concept deduced from any experience, 
for neither) co-existence nor succession would enter into our per- 
ception, if the representation of time were not given d priori." - 
KANT, Critique of Pure Reason ; Max Miiller's Translation. 

2 " Hier haben wir den achten Metaphysiker. Einer angeblichen 
Denknothwendigkeit gegeniiber blickt er hochmiithig auf die, 
welche sich um Erforschung der Thatsachen bemiihen, herab. 1st 
es schon vergessen, wie viel Unheil dieses Verfahren in den 
friiheren Entwicklungsperioden der Naturwissenschaften ange- 
richtet hat ? " Preface to the German Translation of the second 
part of Thomson and Tail's Natural Philosophy. 



INTRODUCTORY. 3 

wrought in the earlier stages of the development of the 
sciences 1 " 

Clerk-Maxwell develops the contrast somewhat more 
elaborately : 

"... In every human pursuit there are two courses 
one, that which in its lowest form is called the useful, and 
has for its ultimate object the extension of knowledge, 
the dominion over Nature, and the welfare of mankind 
The objects of the second course are entirely self-con- 
tained. Theories are elaborated for theories' sake, diffi- 
culties are sought out and treasured as such, and no 
argument is to be considered perfect unless it lands the 
reasoner at the point from which he started. . . . 

" The education of man is so well provided for in the 
world around him, and so hopeless in any of the worlds 
which he makes for himself, that it becomes of the 
utmost importance to distinguish natural truth from 
artificial system, the development of a science from the 
envelopment of a craft." 

Newton, however, had long before expressed essentially 
the same ideas. He said : 

"To tell us that every species of things is endowed 
with an occult specific quality, by which it acts and pro- 
duces manifest effects, is to tell us nothing; but to 
derive two or three general principles of motion from 
phenomena, and afterwards to tell us how the proper- 
ties of all corporeal things follow from those manifest 
principles, would be a very great step in philosophy, 
though the causes of those principles were not yet dis- 
covered ; and therefore I scruple not to propose the 
principles of motion above mentioned, they being of 
very general extent, and leave the causes to be found 
out." 



4 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

Midway between Newton's time and our own, another 
very great man, Young, spoke as follows of the pernicious 
effects of metaphysics in the ancient world : 

" A one of the departments of human knowledge were 
excluded from the pursuits ... of the Grecian sages, 
until Socrates introduced, into the Ionian school, a taste 
for metaphysical speculations, which excluded almost all 
disposition to reason coolly and clearly on natural causes 
and effects." 

Quotations like these might be multiplied indefinitely. 
But we have given enough to j ustify fully the statements 
made in the opening section. These statements must be 
our guide in all that follows. 

4. A stone, a piece of lead or brass, water, air, the 
ether or luminiferous medium, etc., are portions of 
Matter; wound-up springs, water-power, wind, waves, 
compressed air, hot bodies, electric currents, as well as the 
objective phenomena corresponding to our sensations of 
sound and light, are examples of Energy associated with 
matter. For the present, at all events, we are in the 
habit of speaking of Energy as Kinetic when it obviously, 
or at least certainly, depends on motion of matter. Thus 
the energy of wind, waves, heat, electric currents, etc., is 
kinetic. But energy stored up, as in a charged thunder- 
cloud, a wound-up spring, a "head" of water, is called 
Potential. Of its intimate nature we as yet know 
nothing, and it is possible that it may be ultimately 
kinetic : i.e. dependent upon motions of inscrutably 
minute parts of matter. 

5. All trustworthy experiments, without exception, 
have been found to lead to the conviction that matter is 
unalterable in quantity by any process at the command 
of man. 



INTRODUCTORY. 5 

This is one of the strongest arguments in favour of 
the objective existence of matter. It was usefully 
employed, at the very end of last century, by Rumford in 
his memorable Inquiry concerning the Source of the Heat 
excited by Friction. 1 

It forms also the indispensable foundation of modern 
chemistry, whose main instrument is the balance, used 
to determine quantity of matter with great exactness. 

We may speak of this property, for the sake of future 
reference, as the Conservation of Matter. It justifies one- 
half of the statement in 2, A. 

It is to be remarked here that the statements just made, 
being the direct result of experiment, are strictly applicable 
to gross matter only. The Ether or luminiferous and 
electrical medium is certainly matter, in the sense of 
having Inertia ( 9), but we have at present no means of 
investigating its conservation. 

6. So far the reader (if he resemble at all the average 
student of our acquaintance) is not likely to feel much 
difficulty. His every-day experience must have long ago 
impressed on him the conviction of the objectivity of 
matter, though perhaps he may not have learned to express 
it in such a form of words. 

But it is usually otherwise when he is told that energy 
has an objective existence quite as certainly as has matter. 
He has been accustomed to the working of water-mills, let 
us say, and he cannot but allow that a " head " of water is 
something other than the water ; it is something associated 
with the water in virtue of its elevation. He sees and (if 
he be of an economic turn) he deplores the terrible waste 
of water-power which is stupidly permitted to go on all 
over the world. He allows that water-power does exist, 
1 Phil. Trans., 1798. 



6 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

but the waste which he laments he looks upon as its 
annihilation. Till within the last fifty years or so the 
vast majority even of scientific men held precisely the 
same opinion. 

7. The modern doctrine of the Conservation of Energy, 
securely based upon the splendid investigations of Joule 
and others, completes the justification of our preliminary 
statement. Energy, like matter, has been experimentally 
proved to be indestructible and uncreatable by man. It 
exists, therefore, altogether independently of human 
senses and human reason, though it is known to man 
solely by their aid. 

One of the most curious passages in history is that 
which describes the quest of The Perpetual Motion. 
This was simply the attempt to discover a continuous 
Source of fresh mechanical energy. In 1775 the Academy 
of Sciences declined, for the future, to consider any 
scheme which professed to furnish work without corre- 
sponding and equivalent expenditure. But the race of 
Perpetual Motionists is by no means even yet extinct. 
The doctrine of the impossibility of the Perpetual Motion 
is often valuable in modern physics (see, for instance, 
139 below), as it furnishes simple ex absurdo proofs of 
important fundamental theorems. 

The objectivity of energy is virtually admitted in a 
curious way, by its being advertised for sale. Thus in 
manufacturing centres, where a mill-owner has a steam- 
engine too powerful for his requirements, he issues a 
notice to the effect, " Spare Power to let." But, of 
course, the common phrase "price of labour" at once 
acknowledges the objectivity of work. 

8. There is, however,, a most important point to be 
noticed. Energy is never found except in association 



INTRODUCTORY. 7 

with matter. Hence we might define matter as the 
Vehicle or Receptacle of Energy ; and it is already more 
than probable that energy will ultimately be found, in 
all its varied forms, to depend upon Motion of matter. 

This is advanced, for the moment, as a mere introductory 
statement, instances of which will be discussed even in 
the present work ; but its complete treatment would 
require the introduction of branches of physics with 
which we have here nothing to do. One great argument 
in its favour is, that matter is found to consist of parts 
which preserve their identity, while energy is manifested 
to us only in the act of transformation, and (though 
measurable) cannot be identified. For this is precisely 
what we should expect to find if energy depends in- 
variably on motion of matter. 

9. Beside their common characteristic, conservation, 
and in strange contrast to it, we have their characteristic 
difference. Matter is simply passive (inert is the scientific 
word) ; energy is perpetually undergoing transformation. 
The one is, as it were, the body of the physical universe; 
the other its life and activity. All terrestrial phenomena, 
from winds and waves to lightning and thunder, eruptions 
and earthquakes, are transformations of energy. So 
are alike the brief flash of a falling star, and the fiery 
glow from the mighty solar outbursts of incandescent 
hydrogen. 

10. From the strictly scientific point of view, the greater 
part of the present work would be said to deal with energy 
rather than with matter. In fact, were we to speak of 
weight as a property of matter, in the sense that a stone 
of itself has weight, or even in the sense that the earth 
attracts the stone, we should go directly in the teeth of 
Newton's distinct assertion. 



8 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

For such a statement (because confined to the attract- 
ing bodies alone) implies the existence of Action at a 
Distance, a very old but most pernicious heresy, of which 
much more than traces still exist among certain schools, 
even of physicists. (See Newton's words on this subject, 
160 below.) 

Gravitation, like all other mutual actions between 
particles of matter, such as give rise to cohesion, 
elasticity, etc., must, with our present knowledge, be set 
down to the energy which particles of matter are 
found to possess when separated. The intervening 
mechanism by which this is to be accounted for has, as 
yet, only been guessed at, and none of the guesses have 
been succesoM. Clerk-Maxwell's success in explaining 
electric and magnetic attractions by something analogous 
to stresses and rotations in the luminiferous ether shows, 
however, that we need not despair of being able to dis- 
cover the ultimate mechanism of gravitation. 

But there is great convenience in separating, as far 
as possible, the treatment of Mass, Weight, Cohesion, 
Elasticity, Viscosity, etc., which we range under the 
general title, Properties of Matter, from that of Heat, 
Light, Electric Energy, etc., which can all in great 
measure be studied without express reference to any one 
special kind of matter though, as forms of energy, they 
exist only ( 8 above) in association with matter. Along 
with these forms of energy must of course be treated the 
allied properties of matter, such as specific heat, refractive 
index, conductivity, etc. Such, therefore, are foreign to 
the present work. And it must be remarked that, even 
in popular language, we invariably speak of the hardness 
of a body, its rigidity, its elasticity, as belonging to it in 
much the same sense as does its density or its atomic 



INTRODUCTORY. 9 

weight and certainly in a much more intimate sense 
than does its temperature or its electric potential. 

It is, therefore, on the two grounds of custom and 
convenience that we use the term Properties of Matter as 
the title of this work. The error involved is not by any 
means so monstrous as that which all agree to perpetuate 
hy the use of the term Centrifugal Force. 

11. The word Force must often, were it only for 
brevity's sake, be used in the present work. As it does 
not denote either matter or energy, it is not a term for 
anything objective ( 2, A). The idea it is meant to 
express is suggested to us by the " muscular sense," just 
as the ideas of brightness, noise, smell, or pain are sug- 
gested by other senses : though they do not correspond 
directly to anything which exists outside us. 

It is exceedingly difficult to realize fully the fact that 
noise is a mere subjective impression, even when reason 
has convinced us that outside the drum of the ear then- 
is nothing to correspond to it except a periodic com 
pression and dilatation of the air. 

Still more difficult is it to realize that outside us all it 
dark; and that the objective cause of even the most 
gorgeous of optical phenomena is an excessively rapid 
quivering motion of the ethereal jelly which extends- 
through all space. 

We need not, therefore, be surprised at the tenacity 
with which the great majority, even of scientific men, 
still cling to the notion of force as something objective. 

But if it were objective, what an absolutely astounding 
difficulty would have to be faced by one who tries to 
explain the nature of hydrostatic pressure; and who 
finds that by the touch of a finger on a little piston he 
can produce a pressure of (say) a pound weight on every 



10 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

square inch of the surface of a vessel, however large, if 
full of water, and the same amount on every square inch 
of surface of every object immersed in it, even if that 
object consisted of hundreds of square miles of sheets 
of tinfoil far enough apart to let the water penetrate 
between them. All this, moreover, is found to disappear 
the moment he lifts his finger ! 

When we communicate energy to a body, as in pushing 
or drawing a carriage, the impression produced upon our 
muscular sense does not correspond to the energy com- 
municated per second, but to the energy communicated 
per inch of the motion. For experiment has proved 
that what appears to our muscular sense as a definite 
tension (in a cord, let us say) is associated with the com- 
munication of energy, to any mass of matter whatever, 
in direct proportion to the (linear) space through which 
it is exerted, altogether independently of the speed with 
which the mass may be already moving in the direction 
of the tension ; so that in equal times energy is com- 
municated in direct proportion to that speed. When 
there is no motion, no energy is communicated ; and this 
would certainly not be the case if communication of 
energy corresponded to the time during which the tension 
was said to act. 

12. The muscular sense is far more deceptive than any 
other, except, perhaps, that of touch. Conjurors, ven- 
triloquists, perfumers, and cooks make their livelihood by 
practising on the imperfections of our senses of sight, 
hearing, smell, and taste respectively. But he who has 
tried the simple experiment of rolling a pea on the table 
lietween his first and second fingers, after crossing one- 
over the other, will at once recognise the extreme deceit- 
fulness of the sense of touch. And the muscular sense 



INTRODUCTORY. 11 

well deserves a place beside it. So, as we know that 
there is but one pea, though the sense of touch vividly 
impresses us with the notion that there are two, we must 
be very wary when the muscular sense plainly suggests to 
us the notion of force as an objective reality. 

13. Many of the terms which are now used in a strictly 
scientific sense had a humbler origin, having been devised 
entirely for the popular expression of common ideas. The 
term Work is a specially illustrative one. Thus, in a 
draw-well, the work done in bringing water to the surface 
would be reckoned at first in terms of the quantity of 
water raised: two raisings of a full bucket lifting twice 
as much water as one. But then it was found that, for 
the same quantity of water raised, the work depended on 
the depth of the well : doubled depth corresponding to 
doubled work. Again, if the bucket were filled with sand 
instead of water, more work was required, in proportion 
as sand is heavier than water. All these statements were 
soon found to be comprehended in the simple form : 
the work done is directly proportional to the weight 
raised and also to the height through which it is raised. 
Here the indications of the muscular sense stepped in, and 
work came to have a general meaning, viz. the product 
of the so-called force exerted, into the distance through 
which it is exerted. 

Had they not possessed the muscular sense, men might 
perhaps have been longer than they have been in recog- 
nising the important thing potential energy ( 4) ; but 
when they had come to recognise it, they would have 
stated that when water is raised it gains potential energy 
in proportion as it is raised, and perhaps they might have 
found it convenient to use a single term for the rate at 
which such energy is gained per foot of ascent. This 



12 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

would probably not have been the word " Force," but it 
would have expressed precisely what the word force now 
expresses. 

Then they would have recognised that when energy is 
transmitted by a driving-belt, the amount transmitted is 
(ceteris paribus) directly proportional to the space through 
which the belt has run. They might have invented a 
name for the rate of transmission per foot-run of the belt ; 
they might even have called it the tension of the belt ; but, 
anyhow, it would be precisely what is now called force. 

Let us look at the matter from another point of view. 

14. A stone, if let fall, gradually gains kinetic energy 
or energy of motion, and experiment shows that the 
energy gained is directly proportional to the vertical space 
fallen through. Hence we have come to say that the 
stone is acted upon by a force (its weight, as we call it) 
whose amount is practically the same at all moderate 
distances from the earth's surface. 

But, so far as we know the question scientifically, we 
can say no more than that the stone has potential energy 
(just as water in a mill-pond has head) in proportion to 
its elevation above the earth's surface ; and consequently, 
by the conservation of energy, it must acquire energy of 
motion in proportion to the space through which it 
descends. Why it has potential energy when it is raised, 
and why that potential energy takes the first opportunity 
of transforming itself into kinetic energy : thus requiring 
that the stone shall fall unless it be supported : are 
questions to be approached later. (Chap. VII.) 

15. That the statement above is complete, without the 
introduction of the notion of force, is seen from the fact 
that a knowledge of the kinetic energy acquired, after a 
given amount of descent, enables us to determine fully 



INTRODUCTORY. 13 

the nature of the resulting motion even when the stone is 
projected, obliquely or vertically, not merely allowed to 
fall. The question is easily 'reduced to one of mathe- 
matics, or rather of Kinematics, and as such the non- 
mathematical student must, for the present, simply accept 
the statement as true. 

And thus we have another of the many distinct and 
independent proofs that Force is a mere phantom sugges- , 
tion of our muscular sense ; though there can be no doubt 
that, in the present stage of development of science, the 
use of the term enables us greatly to condense our 
descriptions. 

But it is a matter for serious consideration whether we 
do not connive at a species of mystification by thus 
employing, in the treatment of objective phenomena, a 
term for a mere sensation, corresponding to nothing 
objective: even although it be employed solely to shorten 
our statements or our demonstrations. 

Every one knows that matter (e.g. corn, gold, diamonds) 
has its price ; so (as we saw in 7) has energy. We are 
not aware of any case in which force has been offered for 
sale. To " have its price" is not conclusive of objectivity, 
for we know that Titles, Family Secrets, and even Degrees, 
are occasionally sold ; but " not to have its price " is at 
least all but conclusive against objectivity. 

We are in the habit of speaking of fresh air, sunshine, 
&c., though obviously objective, as priceless ! 

16. These introductory remarks have been brought 
in with the view of warning the reader that we are 
dealing with a subject so imperfectly known that at almost 
any part of it we may pass, by a single step as it were, 
from what is acquired certainty to what is still subject 
for mere conjecture 



14 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

An exact and adequate conception of matter itself, 
could we obtain it, would almost certainly be something 
extremely unlike any conception of it which our senses 
and our reason will ever enable us to form. Our object, 
therefore, in what follows, is mainly to state experimental 
facts, and to draw from them such conclusions as seem to 
be least unwarrantable. 

17. But, for the classification of the properties of 
matter, whether our classification be a good one or not, 
it is necessary that we should have a definition of matter. 

From what was said in last section it is obvious that 
no definition we can give is likely to be adequate. All 
that we can attempt, then, is to select a definition which 
(while not obviously erroneous) shall serve as at least a 
temporary basis for the classification we adopt. 

18. Numberless definitions of matter have been pro- 
posed. 1 Here are a few of the more important : 

(a) That which possesses Inertia ( 9). 

((3) The Receptacle or Vehicle of Energy ( 8). 

(y) Whatever exerts or can be acted on by Force. 

(8) Whatever can be perceived by our senses, especi- 
ally the sense of Touch. This is closely akin 
to the well-known definition of matter as a 
Permanent Possibility of Sensation. 

() Whatever can occupy space. 

() Whatever, in virtue of its motion, possesses Energy. 

(rj) Whatever, to set it in motion, requires the ex- 
penditure of Work. 

(0) [Torricelli, Lezioni Accademiche, 1715, p. 25.] La 
materia altro non e, che un vaso di Circe incan- 
tato, il quale serve per ricettacolo della forza, e de' 

1 A remarkable collection of such (now historical) speculations, 
due to Professor Flint, is given in Appendix I. 



INTRODUCTORY. 15 

momenti dell' impeto. La forza poi, e gl' impeti, 
sono astratti tanto sottili, son quintessenze tanto 
spiritose, che in altre ampolle non si posson 
racchiudere, fuor che nell' intima corpulenza de' 
solidi natural!. 

(0 [The Vortex Hypothesis of Lord Kelvin.] The 
rotating parts of an inert perfect fluid ; whose 
motion is absolutely continuous, which fills all 
space, but which is, when not rotating, absolutely 
unperceived by our senses. 

|(/c) Surfaces of misfit in a granular medium. [Hypo- 
thesis of Osborne Reynolds.] 
(A) Loci of intrinsic rotational strain in the ether. 

[Hypothesis of Larmor.] See App. V. 
(/A) Fundamentally of electric constitution. [J. J. 
Thomson and Kelvin.] See Chap. XV. and 
App. VI. , ; It should be noted that, as Larmor 
has pointed out, the vortex hypothesis gives no 
account of electric action. W. P.] 
19. The mutual incompatibility of certain pairs of 
these definitions shows that some of them, at least, must 
be of the so-called metaphysical species ( 3). 

(a), (/?), (), (rj), above, have much in common, and, 
with further knowledge, may perhaps be found to differ 
in expression merely. At present, from want of informa- 
tion, we cannot be certain that any two of them are 
precisely equivalent. 

Berkeley virtually asserted that all motion is produced 
by the direct action of spirits on matter. Even then, the 
statement (/3) that matter is the receptacle or vehicle of 
energy holds good (but how then does energy exist in 
the spirit ?). 

But the statement that matter is whatever can exert 



16 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

force (y) is to be rejected ; though it was virtually intro- 
duced by Cotes in his Preface to the second edition of 
the Principia. 

(8) must be rejected, if only because there is another 
thing besides matter (in the physical universe) which we 
know of, and of course only through our senses ( 1). 
But this is not all the error ; for we get the notion of 
force through our muscular sense ( 11), and force is not 
matter, not even a thing. 

Torricelli's language is poetical, and therefore his 
statement (6) must not be taken too literally. In his 
time, as in all subsequent time till well within the last 
half century, energy and force were very rarely distin- 
guished from one another. Even now they are too often 
confounded. 

(i), the most recent of these speculations, has the 
curious peculiarity of making matter, as we can perceive 
it, depend upon the existence of a particular kind of 
motion of a medium which, under many of the defini- 
tions above, would be entitled to claim the name of 
matter, even when it is not set in rotation. 

20. But as we do not know, and are probably incapable 
of discovering, what matter is, we must content ourselves 
for the present with a definition which, while not at 
least obviously incorrect, shall for the time serve as a 
working hypothesis. 

"We therefore choose (e) above, i.e. we define, for the 
moment, as follows : 

Matter is whatever can occupy space. 

Experience has proved that it is from this side that the 
average student can most easily approach the subject, i.e. 
here, as it were, the contour lines of the ascent ( 80) are 
most widely separated. 



INTRODUCTORY. 17 

21. A But this definition involves three distinct proper- 
ties: (1) the Volume, (2) the Form or Figure, of the space 
occupied ; and (3) the nature or quality of the Occupation. 

Hence the older classical works on our subject almost 
invariably speak of matter as possessing (1) Extension, 
(2) Form, and (3) Impenetrability. It is mainly for the 
sake of the first of these, and the preliminary discussions 
which it necessarily introduces, that we have chosen the 
above definition as our starting-point. 

22. Before we take these up in detail, however, it may 
be useful to devote a short chapter to a digression on 
some of the more notable of the hypotheses which have 
been propounded as to the ultimate structure of matter. 
We advisedly use the word structure instead of nature, 
for it must be repeated, till it is fully accepted, that the 
discovery of the ultimate nature of matter is probably 
beyond the range of human intelligence. 

Another chapter, of a very miscellaneous character, will 
follow, devoted to the examination of some of the terms 
popularly applied to pieces of matter, and a rapid glance 
at the physical truths which underlie them. This is 
introduced to give the reader, at the very outset of his 
work, a general idea of its nature and extent. 



CHAPTER II. 

SOME HYPOTHESES AS TO THE ULTIMATE STRUCTURE OF 
MATTER. 

23. THE hard Atom, glorified in the grand poem of 
Lucretius, but originally conceived of, some 2400 years ago, 
by the Greek philosophers Demokritus and Leukippus, 
survives (as at least an unrefuted, though a very improb- 
able, hypothesis) to this day. Newton made use of the 
hypothesis of finite, hard, atoms to explain why the speed 
of sound in air was found to be considerably greater than 
that given by his calculations ; which were accurate in 
themselves, but founded on erroneous or, rather, incom- 
plete data. But in this problem Laplace found the vera 
causa, and in consequence Newton's apparent support of 
the hypothesis of hard atoms is no longer available. 

Many of the postulates of this theory are with difficulty 
reconciled with our present knowledge ; some have been 
contemptuously dismissed as "inconceivable." But any 
one who argues on these lines becomes, ipso facto, one of 
the so-called metaphysicians. 

Let us briefly consider the main statements of this 
theory, but without regard to the order in which 
Lucretius gives them. 

24. Nature works by invisible things : thus paving- 



ULTIMATE STKUCTURE OF MATTEK. 19 

stones and ploughshares are gradually worn down without 
the loss of any visible particles. 

Reproduction [i.e. agglomeration of scattered particles 
so as to produce visible bodies] is slower than decay 
[i.e. the breaking up of bodies into invisible particles], and 
therefore there must be a limit to breakage, else the 
breaking of infinite past ages would have prevented any 
reproduction within finite time. Hence there exists a 
least in things [i.e. unbreakable parts or Atoms, "strong 
in solid singleness "]. 

But there is also void in things, else they would be 
jammed together, and unable to move. Here Lucretius 
takes the case of a fish moving in water, showing that 
void is necessary in order that it may be able to move. 
[Our modern knowledge of circulation, i.e. the motion of 
fluids in re-entrant paths, shows that this reasoning is 
baseless.] 

There can be no third thing besides body and void. 
For nothing but body can touch and be touched; and 
what cannot be touched is void. [Here we have the germ 
of the erroneous definition of matter (8) in 18 above.] 

The atoms are infinite in number, and the void in 
which they move [space] is unlimited. 

They have different shapes ; but the number of shapes 
is finite, and there is an infinite number of atoms of each 
shape. 

Nothing whose nature is apparent to sense consists of 
one kind of atoms only. 

The atoms move through void at a greater speed than 
does sunlight. 

Besides this, there is a great deal of curious speculation 
as to bow a vertical downpour of atoms [supposed to be 
a result of their weight] is, in some arbitrary way, made 



20 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

consistent with their meeting one another and agglome- 
rating into visihle masses of matter. 

The basis of the whole of Lucretius' reasoning in 
favour of the existence of atoms lies in the gratuitous 
assumption that reproduction is slower than decay. This 
is by no means consistent with our modern knowledge, 
for potential energy of different masses [whether gravita- 
tional or chemical] is constantly tending to the agglomera- 
tion of parts, and on a far grander scale than that in which 
any known cause tends to decay or breaking up. 

But if there be hard atoms, they must (in all known 
bodies) have intervals between them ; for compressi- 
bility : i.e. capability of having the component atoms 
brought more closely together : is a characteristic of all 
known bodies. [Contrast this mode of arriving at the 
conclusion that " there must be void in things," with the 
erroneous mode employed by Lucretius.] 

25. A refinement of this theory, mainly due to 
Boscovich, gets rid of the material atom altogether, 
substituting for it a mere mathematical point, towards 
or from which certain forces tend. It is supported by 
the assertion that we know matter only by the effects 
which it produces (or seems to produce), and therefore 
that, if these effects can be otherwise explained, we need 
not assume the existence of substance or body at all. 
This theory was, at least in part, accepted by so great an 
experimenter and reasoner as Faraday. It virtually 
substitutes force for matter as an objective thing ( 2) } 
and it essentially involves the heresy of distance-action 
( 10). But the fatal objection to which it is exposed is 
that it does not seem capable of explaining inertia, which 
is certainly a distinctive (perhaps the most distinctive) 
property of matter 



ULTIMATE STRUCTURE OF MATTER. 21 

This theory must be regarded as a mere mathematical 
fiction, very similar to that which (in the hands of 
Poisson and Gauss) contributed so much to the theory 
of statical Electricity ; though, of course, it could in no 
way aid inquiry as to what electricity is. 

26. A much more plausible theory is that matter is 
continuous (i.e. not made up of particles situated at a 
distance from one another) and compressible, but in- 
tensely heterogeneous ; like a plum-pudding, for instance, 
or a mass of brick-work. The finite heterogeneousness 
of the most homogeneous bodies, such as water, mercury, 
or lead, is proved by many quite independent trains of 
argument based on experimental facts. If such a con- 
stitution of matter be assumed, it has been shown l that 
gravitation alone would suffice to explain at least the 
greater part of the phenomena which (for want of know- 
ledge) we at present ascribe to the so-called Molecular 
Forces. But it does not seem to be compatible with 
experimental facts; especially some of the simpler 
phenomena presented by gases. ( 55, 322.) 

27. The most recent attempt at a theory of the 
structure of matter, the hypothesis of Vortex Atoms, is 
of a perfectly unique, self-contained character. Its postu- 
lates are few and simple, but the working out of anything 
beyond their immediate consequences is a task to tax to 
the utmost the powers of the greatest mathematicians for 
generations to come. A vortex filament, in a pefect 
fluid, is a true " atom ; " but it is not hard like those of 
Lucretius ; it cannot be cut, but that is because it 
necessarily wriggles away from the knife. 

The idea that motion is, in some sort, the basis of 
what we call matter is an old one : but no distinct con- 
1 "W. Thomson, Pro c . R.S.E. t 1862. 



22 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

ceptions on the subject were possible until v. Helmholtz, 
in 1858, made a grand contribution to hydrokinetics in 
the shape of his theory of vortex motion. 1 He proved, 
among other entirely novel propositions, that the rotating 
portions of a continuous incompressible fluid, in which 
there is neither viscosity nor finite slipping, maintain 
their identity : being thus for ever definitely differenti- 
ated from the non-rotating parts. He also showed that 
these rotating portions are necessarily arranged in con- 
tinuous, endless filaments : forming closed curves, which 
may be knotted or linked in any way : unless they 
extend to the bounding surface of the fluid, in which 
alone they can have ends. Thus, to give ends to a 
closed vortex filament (i.e. to cut it) we must separate 
the fluid mass itself, of which it is a portion : so that 
on Lord Kelvin's theory we must (virtually) sever space 
itself. 

Such vortex filaments (though necessarily of an im- 
perfect character) are produced when air is forced to 
escape from a box, through a circular hole in one side, 
by sharply pushing in the opposite side. If the air in 
the box be filled with smoke, or with sal-ammoniac 
crystals, the escaping vortex ring is visible to the eye; 
and the collisions of two vortex rings, which rebound 
from one another, and vibrate in consequence of the 
shock, as if they had been made of solid india-rubber, 
are easily exhibited. Experimental results of this kind 
led Lord Kelvin 2 to propound the theory that matter, 
such as we perceive it, is merely the rotating parts of a 
fluid which fills all space. This fluid, whatever it be, 
must have inertia : that is one of the indispensable 

1 Crelle, 1858. Translated (by Tait) in Phil. Mag., 1867. 

2 Proc. R.S.E., 1867. 



ULTIMATE STKUCTURE OF MATTER. 23 

postulates of v. Helmholtz's investigation ; and the great 
primary objection to Lord Kelvin's theory is, that it 
explains matter only by the help of something else which, 
though it is not what we call matter, must possess what 
we consider to be one of the most distinctive properties 
of matter. 

28. This theory is still in its infancy, and we cannot as 
yet tell whether it will pass with credit the severe ordeal 
which lies before it, when the properties of vortices (which 
must be discovered by mathematical investigation) shall 
be compared, one by one, with the experimentally ascer- 
tained properties of matter. As we have already said, 
this theory is self-contained ; no new hypotheses can be 
introduced into it ; so that it possesses, as it were, no 
adaptability, or capability of being modified, but must fall 
before the very first demonstrated insufficiency, or contra- 
diction, if such should ever be discovered. 

29. But the really extraordinary fact, already known in 
this part of our subject, is the apparently perfect similarity 
and equality of any two particles of the same kind of gas, 
probably of each individual species of matter when it is 
reduced to the state of vapour. Of such parts, therefore, 
whether they be further divisible or not, each species of 
solid or liquid must be looked on as built up. This 
similarity of parts, very small indeed but still of essenti- 
ally finite magnitude, has been so well treated by Clerk- 
Maxwell that, instead of insisting upon it here, we give a 
considerable extract from one of his remarkable articles 
in Appendix II. below. 

30. The further treatment of the subject of structure, 
involving the question of how the component parts (be 
they atoms or not) of bodies are put together, must be 
deferred to the end of the work. What has been said 



24 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

above must be looked on as a mere preliminary sketch, 
not intended even to be fully understood until the 
experimental data, on which all our reasoning must be 
based, are brought before the reader as completely as our 
limits permit. 



CHAPTER III. 

EXAMPLES OF TERMS IN COMMON USE AS APPLIED TO 
MATTER. 

31. BEFORE we proceed to a more rigorous treatment of 
our subject, it may be well to consider what physical truth 
underlies each of some of the many adjectives in common 
use as applied to portions of matter, such as Massive, 
Heavy, Plastic, Ductile, Viscous, Elastic, Rigid, Opaque, 
Blue, Coherent, etc. 

This course secures a twofold gain, so far as the 
beginner is concerned ; for, first, he is introduced by it, in 
a familiar way, to some of the more important terms 
which are indispensable in scientific description ; and 
second, he obtains a glance here and there through the 
whole subject of Natural Philosophy, because the pro 
gramme before us is so vague as to leave room for 
innumerable digressions, each introducing some novel but 
important fact or property. But we must endeavour to 
be brief, for whole volumes would have to be written 
before this subject could be nearly exhausted. 

32. Every one who has used his senses to any purpose 
knows, before he comes to the study of our science, a 
great many of its phenomena, among them some of the 
yet unexplained. But he knows, as it were, each by 



26 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

itself, and only in its more prominent features; the 
analysis of the appearances or impressions which he has 
seen and experienced, and the explanation of the physi- 
cal fact or process which underlies each of them, are 
absolutely necessary before he can understand the mode 
in which they must be grouped, and the reasons for such 
grouping. 

33. Thus he knows that the moon keeps company with 
the earth, never receding nor approaching by more than a 
small fraction of the average distance. He also knows 
that the earth keeps, within narrow limits, at a definite 
distance from the sun. He has a general notion, at least, 
that the state of matters on the earth would become 
serious, as regards both animal and vegetable life, if we 
were to approach to even half our present distance from 
the sun, or recede to double that distance. But he would 
require to be a Newton if, without instruction, he could 
divine that these results are due to the very cause which 
keeps the bob of a conical pendulum moving in a horizontal 
circle. 

He sees ripples running along on the surface of a pool, 
but requires to be told that their motion depends upon 
the cause which rounds the drops of water on a cabbage- 
blade, or in a shower, and which renders it almost 
impossible to keep a water-surface clean. 

He sees what he calls a flash of lightning, but he 
requires to be told that what he sees is mainly particles 
of air heated so as to be self-luminous. 

He looks at the stars and thinks he sees them as they 
are, but he requires to be informed that he fees even the 
nearest of them only as it was three years ago and that it 
may have changed entirely in the interval. 

And he will certainly require to be informed, even 



TERMS APPLIED TO MATTER. 27 

with patient iteration, that air is made up of separate and 
independent particles : the number of which in a single 
cubic inch is expressed by twenty-one places of figures, a 
multitude altogether beyond human conception : a busy 
jostling crowd, each member of which darts about in 
all directions, impinging on its neighbours some eight 
thousand million times per second. 

But when he has got so far, and has been told that 
this astounding information is as nothing to what we 
feel convinced that science can yet reveal, he cannot help 
marvelling alike at the arcana of physics, and at the 
patient efforts of genius which have already penetrated 
so far into the darkness shrouding its mysteries. 

34. Take the terms Massive and Heavy as applied to 
a piece of matter, or the corresponding substantives, the 
Mass and the Weight of a body. 

The terms are usually regarded as equivalents, but in 
their origin they are completely distinct. The one is a 
property of the body itself, and is retained by it without 
increase or diminution wherever in the universe the body 
may be situated. The other depends for its very exist- 
ence on the presence of a second body, the Earth : and 
varies in inverse proportion to the square of the distance 
from the earth's centre. 

The destructive effects of a cannon-ball are due entirely 
to its mass and to the relative speed with which it 
impinges on the target. They have nothing to do with 
its weight, for they would be exactly the same (for the 
same relative speed) in regions so far from the earth, or 
other attracting body, that the ball had practically no 
weight at all. 

When an engine starts a train on a level railway, or 
when a man projects a curling-stone along smooth ice, 



28 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

the resistance which either prime mover has to overcome 
is due to the mass of the body to be moved. Its weight, 
except indirectly through friction, has nothing to do with 
it. So when we open a large iron gate properly sup- 
ported on hinges, it is the mass with which we have to 
deal ; if it were lying on the ground and we tried to lift 
it, we should have to deal simultaneously with its weight 
and with its mass. 

The exact proportionality of the weights of bodies to 
their masses, at any one place on the earth's surface, 
was proved experimentally by Newton, and is thus no 
mere truism, but an essential part of the great law of 
gravitation. 

Thus a pound of matter is a definite amount, or mass, 
of matter, unchangeable whithersoever that matter may 
be carried. But the weight of a pound of matter, or a 
" pound- weight," as it is commonly called, is a variable 
quantity, depending upon the position of the body with 
respect to the earth ; and changes (to an easily measurable 
amount) as we carry the body to different latitudes, even 
without leaving the sea-level. 

35. The common use of the balance as a means of 
measuring out equal quantities of matter is justified by 
Newton's result ; but the process is essentially an indirect 
one, for the balance tells only of equality of weight. If 
the earth were hollow at the core, the balance would 
cease to act in the cavity ( 140). Bodies would preserve 
their masses there, but would be deprived of weight, at 
least so far as the earth is concerned. 

To sum up for the present, the mass of a body is 
estimated by its inertia, and is taken as the measure of 
the amount of matter in the body ; while the weight is 
an accidental property, connected with the presence of 



TEEMS APPLIED TO MATTER. 29 

another mass of matter. But it is a most remarkable 
fact that under the same given external conditions the 
weight depends upon the quantity only, and not on the 
quality, of the matter in a body. 

If a body, A, becomes heavy in consequence of the 
presence of another body, B, so in like wise does B become 
heavy in consequence of A's presence. And the weights 
of the two, each as produced by the attraction of the 
other, are exactly equal. Hence, if they be free to 
move, the quantities of motion (i.e. the momenta) pro- 
duced in a given time are equal and opposite. [Newton's 
Lex iii. 128.] But as the momentum is the product of 
the mass and the velocity, the parts of the velocities of 
the two bodies, due to their mutual gravitation alone, 
will be in amount inversely as their masses. Thus, 
though the weight of the whole earth, produced by the 
attraction of a stone, is exactly equal to that of the stone 
produced by the attraction of the earth, the consequent 
rate of fall of the earth towards the stone is less than 
that of the stone towards the earth in the same ratio that 
the mass of the stone is less than that of the earth, and 
is therefore usually so small as to escape observation. 
The moon, however, is a stone whose mass is not exces- 
sively smaller than that of the earth, and the consequences 
of the earth's fall towards the moon have to be taken 
account of in astronomy. 

36. To properties such as mass, which depends on the 
size as well as on the material of a body, and weight 
which, in addition, depends on a second body, there 
correspond what are called specific properties, characteristic 
of the substance and independent of the dimensions of the 
particular specimen examined. 

Thus the mass of a cubic foot of any kind of matter 



30 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

may be called its specific mass. But this quantity, i.e. 
the amount of matter in unit bulk, is usually expressed 
by the term Density. 

The weight of a cubic foot of each particular kind of 
matter in any locality may be called the specific weight. 
But as this varies, though in the same proportion for all 
bodies, from place to place, we use instead of it the ratio 
of the weight of a cubic foot of the substance to that of 
a cubic foot of some standard substance. This is called 
the Specific Gravity. Pure water, at the temperature 
called 4 C. (its maximum-density point), is usually taken 
as the standard substance. 

Newton's experimental result shows that the density 
and the specific gravity of any substance are proportional 
to one another, so that if the density of water at 4 C. 
l)e taken as unit-density, a table of specific gravities is 
identical with a table of densities. ( 166.) But we 
must repeat, the coincidence is an experimental fact, not 
(as yet at least) in any sense a truism. 

Specific gravity is, in general, much more easily 
measured with accuracy than is density, so that it is usually 
the property to be directly determined, the other simply 
following from it in consequence of Newton's discovery. 

37. To vary the subject widely, let us now consider 
the term Viscous as applied to fluids. The contrasted 
adjective is usually taken as Mobile. 

When a liquid partially fills a vessel, and has come to 
rest, it assumes a horizontal upper surface. If the vessel 
be tilted, and held for a time in its new position, the 
liquid will again ultimately settle into a definite position, 
with its surface again horizontal. Practically it occupies 
the same bulk in each of these positions. Hence the only 
change it has suffered is a chsnge of / 



TERMS APPLIED TO MATTER. 



31 



But this change of form is much more rapidly attained 
in some liquids than in others, even v/hen they are of 
nearly the same density. Some (such as sulphuric ether) 
attain their equilibrium position so quickly that they 
retain energy enough to oscillate about it for some time 
before coming to rest; others (such as treacle) attain it 
only after a long time and, unless in great masses and 
when violently disturbed, do not oscillate but gradually 
creep to their final shape. Hence we call treacle viscous. 
To analyse this result let us consider (in a very ele- 
mentary case, for the general analysis of the process 
requires higher mathematical methods than we can employ 
in a work like this) what is involved in Shear: i.e. 
change of form of a body without change of bulk. 

38. When water flows, without eddies, slowly in a 
rectangular channel of uniform width and depth, we 
know, by observation of particles suspended in it, that 
the upper parts flow faster than the lower, and (practically) 
in such a way that a column of the water, originally 
straight and vertical, inclines, as a whole, forwards more 
and more in the direction of its motion. Hence in a 
vertical section, along the middle of the channel, the 
particles originally forming the line ab in the figure will, 

c a' c' 



6 d V d,' 

. FIG.1., 

after the lapse of a certain time, be found approximately 
in the line a'b'. Similarly those which were originally in 



32 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

cd parallel to ab, will be found in c'd', parallel to a'b', and 
so situated that a'c' = ac, and of course also b'd' = bd. The 
figures ad, a'd", are thus parallelograms on equal bases 
and between the same parallels, and therefore equal in 
area. This shows that the water enclosed between 
vertical cross sections through ab and cd has the same 
volume as that between inclined sections (perpendicular 
to the sides) passing through a'b' and c'd'. There has 
thus been change of form only in this mass of water, and 
we see that it has been produced by the sliding of every 
horizontal layer of the water over that immediately 
beneath it. [The same result follows even if a'b' be not 
straight, for c'd' will necessarily be equal and similar to 
it.] A good illustration of the nature of this kind of 
distortion will be seen in the leaves of an opened book, 
especially a thick one, such as the London Directory. It 
is often well exhibited by piles of copies of a pamphlet, 
or of quires of note-paper curiously arranged in a shop- 
window. Now when there is resistance to sliding of one 
solid on another we call it Friction. Thus the viscosity 
of a fluid is due to its internal friction, just as the slower 
motion at the bottom than at the top of the channel is 
to be ascribed to the friction of the liquid against the 
solid. [Another illustration of the subject is frequently 
furnished by the way in which we can judge of the 
direction of the wind from the mere form of detached 
clouds, as seen at a single glance. For such clouds, if 
originally nearly spherical, are distorted into ellipsoids 
whose longer axes overhang, as it were, the direction of 
motion.] 

39. We now see why it is that disturbances of liquids 
gradually die away : why the waves on a lake, or even 
on an ocean, last so short a time after the storm which 



TERMS APPLIED TO MATTER. 33 

produced them has ceased. Also why winds (for there 
is friction in gaseous fluids as well as in liquids, though 
the mechanical explanation of its origin may not be quite 
the same) gradually die out. In either case the energy 
apparently lost is, as in the case of friction of solids, 
merely transformed into heat. We also see why it is 
that winds have the power of raising water-waves. 

The stirring of water, or oil, and the measurement of 
the consequent rise of temperature when the whole had 
come to rest, the work done in stirring being also deter- 
mined, was one of the processes by which Joule found, 
with great accuracy, the dynamical equivalent of heat. 

40. It is very instructive to watch the ascent of an 
air-bubble in glycerine, and to compare it with that of 
an equal bubble in water. The experiment is easily 
tried with long cylindrical bottles, nearly full of different 
liquids, but having a small quantity of air under the 
stopper. When the bottle is inverted the bubble has to 
traverse the whole column. 

The (apparent) suspension in water of mud, and ex- 
ceedingly fine sand (to whose presence the exquisite 
colours of the sea and of Alpine lakes are mainly due), is 
merely another example of viscosity. So is the suspen- 
sion of fine dust, and of cloud particles, in the air. 
Stokes 1 calculates that a droplet of water, a thousandth 
of an inch in diameter, cannot fall in still air at a much 
greater rate than an inch and a half per second. If it be 
of one-tenth of that size it will fall a hundred times 
slower, i.e. not more than one inch per minute ! It is 
very remarkable that the resistance in such cases varies 
as the diameter of the drop. (See 316.) With larger 

1 On the Effect of the internal Friction of Fluids on the Motion 
of Pendulums. Camb. Phil. Trans, ix. (1851), eq n (127). 



34 PROPERTIES OF MATTER 

bodies, moving faster, the resistance is proportional to the 
sectional area, being then in great part due to another 
cause than viscosity. 

41. Bodies are called Elastic or Non-elastic. Compare, 
for instance, the properties of a wire of steel with those 
of a lead wire ; or of a piece of india-rubber and a piece 
of clay or putty. But the popular use of these terms is 
generally very inaccurate. The blame rests mainly with 
the ordinary text-books of science, which are (as a rule) 
singularly at fault with regard to the whole of this special 
subject, including even its most elementary parts. 

Elasticity, in the correct use of the term, implies that 
property of a body in virtue of which it recovers, or tends 
to recover, from a deformation. 

The phrase " tends to recover " is scarcely scientific ; 
we should preferably say " requires the continued applica- 
tion of deforming stress ( 128) to prevent recovery, entire 
or partial, from deformation." 

Kinematics shows us that any deformation, however 
complex, is made up of mere changes of bulk and of form. 

A distortion may therefore be wholly Compression, or 
wholly Shear ( 37), or made up of these in any way. 
Hence there are two distinct kinds of Elasticity, viz. 
Elasticity of Bulk and Elasticity of Form. The former 
is possessed in perfection by all fluids, while the second 
is wholly absent. In solids both are present, but neither 
in perfection (except perhaps in very special cases, and 
then within very narrow limits). 

Thus we see that, as a necessary preliminary to in- 
vestigations on elasticity of bodies, we must study their 
capabilities of being distorted : a whole series of pro- 
perties, such as compressibility, extensibility, rigidity, etc. 

This investigation is given in Chap. VIII., and its 
applications in Chaps. IX., X., XL below. 



TERMS APPLIED TO MATTER. 35 

42. In popular language, bodies are said to be White, 
Black, Blue, Red, etc. The investigation of the under- 
lying scientific facts, on which these depend, is partly 
physical (and therefore within our scope), but also partly 
physiological. The subject is thus a somewhat complex 
one. 

What do we mean by White Light ? This is a question 
much more physiological than physical ; dealing, as it 
does, with phenomena which are subjective rather than 
objective. Probably the true answer to it depends upon 
circumstances, or conditions, which may be varied in- 
definitely, and with them will necessarily vary what is 
described in terms of them. 

Thus, in a room lit by gas, a piece of ordinary writing- 
paper, or of chalk, appears white : at least if we have 
been in the room for some little time. But if, beside it, 
there be another piece of the same paper or chalk on 
which, through a chink, a ray of sunlight is allowed to 
fall (weakened, if necessary, so as to make the two appear 
of nearly the same brightness), we at once call the first 
piece of paper or chalk yellow, allowing the second to be 
white. Here we enter on a purely physiological question. 
In fact, if we accustom ourselves, for a sufficiently long 
time, to the observation of bodies in a room lit up only 
by burning sodium (which gives almost homogeneous 
orange light), we may ultimately come to regard bright 
bodies such as chalk, etc., as being white : others, of 
course, being merely of different shades, or degrees of 
blackness. This, therefore, is foreign to our present 
subject. For all that, it furnishes us with the means of 
answering an important question somewhat different from 
that proposed above, but now a physical question : viz. 
What do we mean by a white body ? 



36 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

43. Suppose two sources to exist in the room, giving 
different kinds of homogeneous light; one being incan- 
descent sodium as before, the other incandescent lithium, 
which (at moderate temperatures) gives a homogeneous red 
light. Chalk and ordinary writing-paper will still appear 
as white bodies to an eye which has become accustomed 
to the light in the room ; other bodies appear darker, but 
some are reddish, some of an orange tint. 

And thus we obtain the idea that what we call a white 
body is one which sends to the eye, in nearly the same 
proportion as it receives them, the various constituents 
of the light which falls upon it ; while a black body 
sends none ; and coloured bodies send back light which, 
while (in general) necessarily made up of the same con- 
stituents as the incident light, contains them in different 
proportions to those in which they fell upon it. [It 
would only confuse the student were we here to refer to 
Fluorescence.] 

44. Thus white light would seem to be a mere relative 
term. It is conceivable that the inhabitants of worlds 
whose sun is a blue star, or a red star (and there are 
many notable examples of such stars), may have their 
peculiar ideas of white light, formed from their own 
circumstances ; as ours is formed from the light of our 
own sun, which is what, in contrast with these, we must 
call a yellow star. 

However this may be, the discussion above has shown 
what is meant by a white body. A blue body is, by 
similar reasoning, one which returns blue rays in greater 
proportion than it does those of other visible light. It is 
therefore said to absorb the other rays in greater proportion 
than it absorbs the blue rays. 

Now we are in a position to understand why blue and 



TERMS APPLIED TO MATTEfc. 37 

yellow pigments, mixed together, give green : while a 
disc, painted with alternate sectors of the same blue and 
yellow, appears of a purplish colour when made to rotate 
rapidly. .For the light given out by the rotating disc is 
a mixture, in the proportion of the angles of the sectors, of 
the kinds of light returned by the blue and yellow separ- 
ately. But that which the mixed pigments send back 
has in great part penetrated far enough into the mass to 
run, as it were, the gauntlet of absorption by each of the 
separate components in turn, and therefore is finally made 
up of those rays alone which are not freely absorbed by 
either. 

To this discussion we need only add, in illustration of 
the conservation of energy, that a body is always found 
to be heated in proportion to the amount of light-energy 
which it absorbs. 

45. Shifting our ground again, we next take the words 
Malleable, Ductile, Plastic, and Friable, as applied to 
solid bodies. 

All of these refer specially to the behaviour of solids 
under the action of stresses which tend to change their 
form; for the change of volume of solids, even under 
very great pressures, is usually very small. The first 
three indicate that the body preserves its continuity while 
yielding to such stresses, the fourth that it breaks into 
smaller parts rather than allow its form to be changed. 
And, in popular use at least, the terms imply in addition 
that the body is not sensibly elastic. 

46. The most perfect example of a malleable body is 
metallic gold. The gold leaf employed for " gilding," as 
it is called, is prepared by a somewhat tedious process, 
which requires a high degree of skill in the workman. 
The gold is first rolled into sheets thinner than the thin- 



38 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

nest writing-paper (thus already showing a high amount of 
plasticity) ; next it is beaten out between leaves of vellum, 
till its surface is increased, and therefore its thickness 
diminished, some twenty-fold. A small portion of this 
fine leaf is then placed between two pieces of gold- 
beater's skin ; and a more skilful workman, with a lighter 
hammer, again extends its surface twenty-fold. This 
operation can be repeated without tearing the thin film of 
metal, so great is its tenacity. ( 226.) 

Here we have one dimension (thickness) diminished 
in a marked manner, but the product of the other two 
dimensions (the surface of the leaf) is of course pro- 
portionally increased. 

47. The action of the hammer may be practically 
viewed as equivalent to that of an intense pressure exerted 
through a very small volume, thus at every stroke apply- 
ing a finite amount of energy. One portion of this is 
changed into heat in the hammer, the anvil, and the 
gold leaf ; the rest is employed in doing work against the 
molecular forces of the gold, and thus altering its form. 

To show that this is the true explanation of the 
observed effect, we may vary the experiment by subject- 
ing a leaden bullet to the action of a hydrostatic press. 
A few strokes of the pump suffice to bruise the bullet 
into a mere cake. The process is essentially the same as 
that of gold-beating, but lead is by no means so malleable 
as gold. 

48. This leads us, in our present discursive treatment 
of parts of our subject, to inquire how it is, that by 
means of such a machine as the Bramah press, a man can 
apply pressure sufficient to mould a piece of lead, whose 
shape he could scarcely alter to a perceptible amount by 
the direct pressure of the hand. 



TERMS APPLIED TO MATTER. 89 

Here we have a first inkling of the Function of a 
Machine. A machine is merely a contrivance by which 
we can apply work in the way most suitable for the 
purpose we have in hand. Work (as a form of energy) 
is a real thing, whose amount is conserved. But we 
have seen that it can be measured as the product of 
two factors the (so-called) force exerted, and the space 
through which it is exerted. Hence, because even when 
a machine is perfect it can give out only the energy 
communicated to it, if there be but one movable part 
to which energy is supplied and another by which it is 
given off, the simultaneous linear motions of these two 
parts must be in the inverse ratio of the forces applied to 
them, or exerted by them, in the direction of these 
motions respectively. Thus we are not concerned with 
the interior structure, or mode of action, of a perfect 
machine : all we need to know is the necessary relation 
of the speeds of the two parts or places at which energy 
is taken in and given out. This is a matter of kinematics, 
and can be made the subject of direct measurement when 
the machine is caused to move, whether it be transmitting 
work or not. 

The statement just made is embodied in the vernacular 
phrase 

What is gained in power is lost in speed. 

Objections may freely be taken to this form of words, 
but it is meant to imply precisely what was said above 
as to the action of a perfect machine. 

If the machine be imperfect, as, for instance, if there 
be frictional heating during its working, the heat so 
produced represents some of the energy given to the 
machine, and the remainder of it is alone efficient. 



40 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

49. A substance is said to be ductile when it can be 
drawn into very fine wires i.e. when it admits of great 
exaggeration of one of its three dimensions (length) at 
the expense of the product of the other two (cross 
section). Wire -drawing is, essentially, a very coarse 
operation, for it has to be effected by finite stages, the 
wire being drawn in succession through a number of 
holes in a hard steel plate, in which each hole is a little 
smaller in diameter than the preceding one. The more 
nearly continuous the operation is made, the more tedious 
and therefore the more costly it becomes. 

The associated tenacity and plasticity of silver render 
it one of the most ductile of metals. And an ingenious 
idea of Wollaston's enables us, as it were, to impart to 
other metals much of the ductility of silver. His idea 
may be briefly explained by analogy as follows. Suppose 
a glass rod, whose core is coloured, be drawn out while 
softened by heating, the diameter of the core is found to 
be reduced in the same proportion as is that of the rod. 
Thus, to obtain platinum wires much finer than could be 
procured by direct drawing, Wollaston suggested the 
boring of a hole in the axis of a cylindrical rod of silver, 
plugging the hole with a platinum wire which just fitted 
it, and then drawing into fine wire the compound 
cylinder. When this operation has been carried to its 
limit, practically determined by the ductility of the 
silver, the diameter of the platinum has been reduced 
nearly in the same proportion as that of the silver ; and 
the silver may be at once removed from the fine platinum 
core by plunging the whole in an acid which freely 
attacks silver but has no effect on platinum. 

50. Plasticity is shown, on the large scale, by many 
substances which, in hand specimens, appear fragile in 



TERMS APPLIED TO MATTER. 41 

the extreme. Glacier-ice is one of these, but its behaviour 
is so closely connected with its thermal properties that 
we can only mention it here. 

The earth as a whole, though its rock-structure appears 
so rigid, has been found to be more plastic (under the 
tidal attraction of the moon) than a globe of glass of the 
same size would have been. 

But it is specially under the action of small but 
persistent forces that bodies, which are usually regarded 
as brittle or friable, show themselves to be really plastic. 
A good example of this is given by an experiment due to 
Lord Kelvin. Cobbler's wax is usually regarded as a 
very brittle body ; yet if a thick cake of it be laid upon 
a few corks, and have a few bullets placed on its upper 
surface (the whole being kept in a great mass of water 
to prevent any but small changes of temperature), after 
a few months the corks will be found to have forced 
their way upwards to the top of the cake, while the 
bullets will have penetrated to the bottom. 

[Tresca has investigated the flow of solid metals, and 
has shown that even steel flows under the action of 
sufficient stress. W. P.] 

51. For variety, let us next take the terms Trans- 
parent, Translucent, and Opaque. 

These refer, of course, to the behaviour of a substance 
with regard to the passage of light through it. In 
common speech, a pane of ordinary window-glass is 
called transparent, while a piece of corrugated or of 
ground glass is translucent : the latter transmits rays, 
no doubt, but with their courses so altered that they are 
no longer capable of producing distinct vision of the 
source from which they come. Consistency would require 
that the term translucent should also be applied to 



42 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

irregularly-heated air, or to a mixture of water and strong 
brine before diffusion has rendered it uniform throughout. 

Translucent is hardly a scientific word, unless we 
choose to limit its application to heterogeneous bodies. 
In science we speak of the degree of transparency of a 
homogeneous substance ; as, for instance, water more or 
less coloured, and employed in greater or less thickness. 
In such cases, besides the inevitable surface-reflection, 
there is more or less absorption ; and the percentage of 
any definite kind of incident light which unit thickness 
of the substance transmits is called its transparency for 
that kind of light. 

Opacity may arise from either of the two causes just 
mentioned. Light may enter a body, and be unable to 
proceed farther, as is the case with lamp black. Or it 
may fall on a highly polished surface, such as thinly 
silvered glass, and be in great part reflected without 
entering. 

In the former case it is said to be absorbed ; and, when 
this happens, the absorbing body is raised in temperature. 
The incident energy is converted from the radiant form 
into that of heat. 

In the latter case part only can enter the body; and, if 
it meet in succession other reflecting surfaces in sufficient 
number, practically the whole of it may be reflected. 
This is the case with a heap of pounded glass, a cloud, 
a mass of snow, or of froth or foam. All of these 
materials are transparent, but they reflect some of the 
incident light; and, in consequence of the multiplicity 
of surfaces which the light has to encounter, the greater 
part of it is reflected before it has penetrated deeply into 
the mass. Hence the whiteness and brightness of snow 
and clouds in full sunshine. 



TERMS APPLIED TO MATTER. 43 

52. We have here an excellent opportunity of calling 
the student's attention to the distinction : a very pro- 
found one : between Heat and Temperature. 

For we have seen that energy, in the form of light, 
when absorbed, becomes heat in the absorbing body, and 
thus raises its temperature. But if the same quantity of 
heat had been given to a body, of the same nature but 
of twice the mass, the rise of temperature would have 
been only half as great. The very form of words here 
used shows at once how different are the meanings of 
the words temperature and heat. For the quantity of 
heat (so much energy, a real thing) is perfectly definite, 
but the effect it produces on the temperature (a mere 
state) depends on the quantity and quality of the mass to 
which it is communicated. 

Heat is therefore a thing, something objective; tem- 
perature is a mere CONDITION of the body with which 
the heat is temporarily associated ; a condition which 
in certain cases determines the physical state of the body 
itself, and in all cases determines its readiness to part 
with heat to surrounding bodies or to receive it from 
them. 

Heat may, in this connection, but only for illustration, 
be compared with the air compressed into the receiver of 
an air-gun ; temperature would then be analogous to the 
pressure of that air. Neither of two receivers would 
(except by diffusion, with which we are not at present 
concerned) give air to the other, when a pipe is opened 
between them, if the pressure were the same in both ; 
but air would certainly flow from the receiver in which 
the pressure is greater to the other ; and this, altogether 
independently of the relative capacities of the two receivers, 
or the consequent amounts of their contents. 



44 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

53. As another example, take the terms Cohesive, In- 
coherent, Repulsive. 

A lump of sandstone has considerable tenacity, which, 
of course, is to be ascribed to those molecular forces of 
which we spoke in 26. But when, in virtue of its 
friability, it has been pounded down into sand, it becomes 
an incoherent powder. And we know that it must at 
some time previously have been in this form, for it often 
contains fossil plants or fish, and it may even have pre- 
served (perhaps for a million or more of years) records of 
surface-disturbance in the form of dents made by rain 
or hail, or by the feet of birds or reptiles. When a 
sufficiently deep layer of sand is deposited, by drifting 
or otherwise, above this portion, its loose particles are 
brought by the consequent pressure so close together that 
their molecular forces once more come into play. 

The graphite, or plumbago, which forms the material 
for the finest drawing-pencils, is a somewhat rare and 
valuable mineral. In cutting it up into " leads," however 
carefully, a considerable portion is reduced to powder 
i.e. sawdust. But if this powder be exposed, in mass, to 
pressure sufficient to bring its particles once more within 
the extremely short mutual distance at which the molecular 
forces are sensible, these forces again come into play, and 
the powder becomes a solid mass, which can in turn 
be sawn into " leads " for a somewhat inferior class of 
pencils. 

The whole of this part of the subject, especially as 
regards liquids, will be fully treated later, so that we need 
not further consider it here. 

54. But let us contrast, with the behaviour of the 
particles of a solid or a liquid, that of the particles of a 
gas or vapour. Such substances require to be subjected 



TERMS APPLIED TO MATTER. 45 

to external pressure in order to prevent their particles 
from being widely scattered. When a small quantity of 
air is allowed to enter an exhausted receiver it dilates so 
as to occupy with practical uniformity the whole interior 
of the receiver, however large that may be. 

This result was, naturally enough, at first ascribed to 
a species of repulsion between the various particles ; but 
the notion was found to be an erroneous one. For the 
effects of a true repulsion, capable of producing the 
practically infinite dilatation already spoken of, could not 
all be consistent with the corresponding observed results. 
The mode of departure from them depends upon the law 
according to which the repulsion may be supposed to vary 
with the distance between two particles. Some assumed 
laws would give as a consequence that the particles would 
all be driven to the sides of the vessel, leaving the interior 
void. Others would require that the pressure should 
change in value if we were to take half the gas and con- 
fine it in a vessel of half the content. Others would 
make it different at different parts of the surface unless 
the vessel were truly spherical, etc. etc. 

The true explanation of the phenomenon becomes 
obvious to us when we apply heat to the gas. For it 
then appears that the pressure requisite to maintain the 
whole at a constant volume increases as the temperature 
is raised ; and thus that heat is, in some way, the cause 
of the pressure. 

55. Hence we are led to what is called the Kinetic 
Theory of gases, whose fundamental assumption ( 33) is 
that the particles dart about in all directions (with an 
average speed which is greater the higher the tempera- 
ture), impinging on one another, and also upon the sides 
of the containing vessel. This continued series of very 



46 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

small but very numerous impacts (each, by itself, absolutely 
escaping observation) is perceived by our senses as the 
so-called "pressure" exerted by the gas. Experiment 
shows that, when a gas is confined in a vessel of definite 
size, the changes of its pressure are nearly proportioned 
to the changes of temperature, as measured by a mercury 
thermometer, whether these changes be in the direction 
of a rise or a fall. If we assume, for a moment, that 
this statement is true for all ranges of temperature, even 
beyond those attainable in experiment, it leads us to the 
very important question : At what temperature does the 
pressure of a gas vanish ? 

Calculations carried out in the above way showed that, 
under the assumption just mentioned, all of the (so-called) 
permanent gases cease to exert pressure at one common 
temperature (about- 273 C.). Therrnodynamical theory 
comes to our assistance and shows that the above guess is 
not far from the truth : that a body, cooled to 274 C., 
cannot be cooled any farther; that it then is, in fact, 
totally deprived of heat 

We might, therefore, fancy that a gas, if it could be 
brought to this temperature, would be reduced to a mere 
layer of incoherent dust or powder, deposited by gravity 
on the lower surface of the containing vessel. But 
experiment has shown that gaseous particles, even while 
in motion, if only close enough together, exert mutual 
molecular forces, so that the result (on any gas) of the 
conditions above specified would probably be its assuming 
a liquid or even a solid form. In fact Andrews has shown 
that, for each particular substance, there is a temperature 
(usually called the Critical Point) such that, while the 
substance is at any higher temperature it is necessarily a 
gas, in the sense that it cannot be liquefied by any pressure, 



TERMS APPLIED TO MATTER. 47 

however great. At any lower temperature it can be 
liquefied by the application of sufficient pressure, and is 
therefore to be regarded as a true vapour. 

56. We speak of bodies as Hard and Soft. These are 
barely scientific terms; because, unless they are strictly 
defined, they may bear a great variety of meanings. 

Thus, for instance, we have the mineralogist's Scale of 
Hardness, which is often of great practical value in field- 
work. For there are numerous instances in which two 
quite different minerals (sometimes a very valuable and a 
very common one) are almost undistinguishable from one 
another so far as colour, density, and crystalline form are 
concerned. Chemical tests (even the comparatively coarse 
blowpipe tests), though they would settle a question of 
this kind at once, are not readily applied in the field. 
Hence the use of the scale of hardness, in which minerals 
are so arranged that every one can scratch the surface of 
any other which is lower in the scale. By carrying a set 
of twelve small specimens only, of selected minerals, the 
finder of a doubtful crystal can readily determine its rank 
among them as regards scratching; and can thus often 
settle in a moment what would otherwise require some 
time, even with the facilities of a laboratory. 

In such a scale diamond, of course, stands at the top, 
while native copper, one of the toughest of substances, is 
far below it. 

But if we were to test relative hardness by some other 
method, say by blows of a hammer, we should be led to 
arrange our specimens in a very different order. The scale 
above spoken of is, therefore, by no means a scientific one ; 
though, as we have seen, it may often give easily some 
useful information. 



CHAPTER IV. 

TIME AND SPACE. 

57. WE begin with an extract from Kant, who, as mathe- 
matician and physicist, has a claim on the attention of 
the physical student of a very different order from that 
possessed by the mere metaphysicians. 

" Time and space are two sources of knowledge, from 
which various a priori synthetical cognitions can be 
derived. Of this pure mathematics give a splendid 
example in the case of our cognitions of space and its 
various relations. As they are both pure forms of 
sensuous intuition, they render synthetical propositions a 
priori possible. But these sources of knowledge a priori 
(being conditions of our sensibility only) fix their own 
limits, in that they can refer to objects only in so far as 
they are considered as phenomena, but cannot represent 
things as they are by themselves. This is the only field 
in which they are valid ; beyond it they admit of no 
objective application. This peculiar reality of space and 
time, however, leaves the truthfulness of our experience 
quite untouched, because we are equally sure of it, 
whether these things are inherent in things by themselves, 
or by necessity in our intuition of them only. Those, 
on the contrary, who maintain the absolute reality of 



TIME AND SPACE. 49 

space and time, whether as subsisting or only as inherent, 
must come into conflict with the principles of experience 
itself. For if they admit space and time as subsisting 
(which is generally the view of mathematical students of 
nature), they have to admit two eternal infinite and self- 
subsisting nonentities (space and time), which exist with- 
out their being anything real only in order to comprehend 
all that is real. If they take the second view (held by 
some metaphysical students of nature), and look upon 
space and time as relations of phenomena, simultaneous 
or successive, abstracted from experience, though repre- 
sented confusedly in their abstracted form, they are 
obliged to deny to mathematical propositions a priori 
their validity with regard to real things (for instance in 
space), or at all events their apodictic certainty, which 
cannot take place a posteriori, while the a priori concep- 
tions of space and time are, according to their opinions, 
creatures of our imagination only." l 

On matters like these it is vain to attempt to dogma- 
tise. Every reader must endeavour to use his reason, as 
he best can, for the separation of the truth from the 
metaphysics in the above characteristic passage. 

58. We must now take up, as indicated in 21, the 
property Extension, which is one of those expressly in- 
cluded in our provisional definition of matter. 

It implies that all matter has volume, or bulk. The 
thinnest gold leaf has finite thickness, ths finest wire has 
a finite cross section. 

In popular language this is recognised by the use of 
the associated terms length, breadth, arid thickness. 

In other words, the term extension recognises the 
essentially Tridimensional character of space. 

1 Critique of Pure Reason. Max Muller's Translation. 



50 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

Why space should have three dimensions, and not 
more nor less, is a question altogether beyond the range 
of human reason. Only those who fancy that they know 
what space is, would venture (at least after well con- 
sidering the meaning of their words) to frame such a 
question. 

59. The proof that our space has essentially three 
dimensions is given in its most conclusive form by the 
statement, based entirely upon experience, that 

To assign the relative position of two points in space, 
three numbers (of which one at least must be a multiple of 
the unit of length) are necessary, and are sufficient. 

It is an easy matter for us, accustomed to tridimen- 
sional space, to imagine one or more of its dimensions 
to be suppressed. In fact so-called Plane Geometry is 
the geometry of one particular kind of two-dimensional 
space; Spherical Trigonometry that of another. We 
cannot well speak of the geometry of space of one, or of 
no dimensions ; but the idea we should thus attempt to 
express is a correct one, though the term is inappropriate. 

When, however, we try to conceive space of four or 
more dimensions, we are attempting to deal with some- 
thing of which we have not had experience ; and thus, 
though we may by analogy extend our analytical and 
other processes to an imagined space, in which the rela- 
tive position of two points depends on more than three 
numerical data, we can form no precise idea of how the 
additional dimensions would present themselves to our 
senses or to our reason. 

A few remarks on this subject will be made at the end 
of the chapter. 

60. Space of no dimensions is a geometrical point, of 
which nothing further can be said 



TIME AND SPACE. 51 

61. Space of one dimension: let us call that dimen- 
sion Length : is a mere geometrical line which may be 
curved or straight. But to be sure of the existence of 
this characteristic, and to understand its true nature, we 
must have cognisance of space of two dimensions if it be 
a plane curve, of three if it be tortuous. The study of 
all the properties of space of one dimension, though an 
excessively simple affair, is of very great intrinsic import- 
ance, besides being a necessary step towards that of the 
higher orders. We will, therefore, treat it so fully that a 
far less amount of detail will be necessary when we come 
to two and to three dimensions. 

62. Every one, whether he be aware of the fact or not, 
is acquainted by experience with at least the elements of 
this subject. Suppose, for instance, we take as our one- 
dimensioned space any one of the roads or railways lead- 
ing from Edinburgh to London ; which we will, for the 
moment, suppose to be straight, and to run due south. 
The mile-stones, set up at equal distances along the road, 
mark the positions of various points in terms of the one 
dimension, length, which is alone involved, or, rather, to 
which for the present we restrict our consideration. And 
a Gazetteer or a Railway Guide gives us the positions of 
the towns or stations along the road or line : the position 
of each being fully described by a single number, under- 
stood as a multiplier of a mile or of some other specified 
unit of length, and with a qualification which will 
presently be introduced. 

But these numbers refer to the distance from some 
assumed starting-point, or Origin as it is technically 
called ; say, in this case, London. Thus we find in an 
old Road Guide, for the particular one-dimensioned space 



52 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

called the East Coast Route, a column of data from which 

we extract the following : 

Miles. 
London ......... 

York .196 

Berwick 337 

Edinburgh ........ 395 

Fractions of miles are omitted, to avoid mere arithmetical 
complication. 

From this table, by ordinary subtraction, we form a 
list, as below, of the lengths of what we may call the 

various stages of the route. Thus 

Miles. 
London to York . , . . . . .196 

York to Berwick . 141 

Berwick to Edinburgh . . . . .58 

It will be seen that, in this list, the origin from which 
each number is measured is the first named of the two 
corresponding places, and the number itself is found by 
subtracting, in the first list, the number corresponding 
to the first of the two places from that corresponding to 
the second. 

63. Now let us at once take the only step which 
presents any difficulty. Choose York as our origin, and 
boldly apply the rule just given, no matter what the 

consequences may be. The result is 

Miles. 

London . . . -196 

York 

Berwick. . V 141 

Edinburgh 199 

Here there is no difficulty whatever in understanding the 
numbers for Berwick and for Edinburgh. They are, as 
before, the numbers of miles by which Berwick and 
Edinburgh are separated from York. Also the number 



TIME AND SPACE. 53 

for London, when York is the origin, differs from that for 
York, when London is the origin, only by change of 
sign. 

So that we at once recognise the meaning of the 
negative sign as applied to a length in our one-dimen- 
sional space : it measures the length in the opposite 
direction to that in which a positive length is measured. 

The necessity for this convention, and its extreme 
usefulness, were early recognised in Cartesian geometry, 
but they had long before been applied in common arith- 
metic as well as in algebra. 

Perhaps the simplest view we can take of the subject 
is that afforded by a man's " balance " at the bank. So 
long as this is on the right side (i.e. positive) he can draw 
any less amount and still be on the credit side; if he 
overdraws (i.e. takes more out of the bank than his 
balance), the difference is negative, and he is to that 
amount indebted to the bank. 

64. In the first of the three little tables above, all the 
places involved lay to the north of the origin (London), 
and were all therefore affected by the same sign (which 
we happened to take as + ). When York was taken as 
origin, Berwick and Edinburgh were to the north, and 
their numerical quantities were still + . But London 
being to the south, had a - number. 

It would be easy to give multiplied examples of this, 
but they are unnecessary. The only additional com- 
ments which we need make are these : 

(1.) When the northern direction along a line was 
called +, the southward necessarily became . Simi- 
larly had we chosen southward as + , northward would 
have become - . 

(2.) We chose for our special example a northward- 



64 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

running line, but we might equally well have chosen an 
eastward one, etc. Hence pairs such as N". and S., E. 
and W., up and down, etc., must he regarded as having 
their members contrasted exactly as are the + and - of 
Algebra or of Analytical Geometry. 

And, just as a displacement in either direction along a 
line may be regarded as +, while a displacement in 
the opposite direction must then be regarded as - , so it 
is with rates of motion, i.e. Speeds, in space of one 
dimension. 

Thus the relative speed of two trains running north- 
ward, A at 60 miles an hour, B at 40, is 20 miles an 
hour northward as regards A seen from B, and 20 south- 
ward as regards B seen from A; so if A be moving 
southward at 60 miles an hour, and B northward at 
40, the speed of A with regard to B is 100 miles per 
hour southward, and of B with regard to A 100 miles per 
hour northward. 

The idea of speed, as so many units of linear space 
described per unit of time, is a complex one : involving 
both of the fundamental ideas. We express this by 
saying that its Dimensions are 

L 



[*} 



This implies that, in whatever proportion we increase 
our unit of length, the measure of a speed is diminished 
in that proportion : while it is increased in the same 
proportion as that in which the unit of time is 
increased. 

Thus a speed of 5280 feet per second is but 1 mile 
per second; while a speed of 1 foot per second is 60 
feet per minute. 

65. A precisely similar distinction (as to + and - ) is 



TIME AND SPACE. 65 

observed when our one-dimensional space is a curved 
line; take for example the orbit of a planet. To 
describe fully the position of the planet, when the orbit 
is given, one number alone (say the angle-vector, the 
angle which the radius-vector, or line joining the centres 
of planet and sun, makes with some fixed line in the 
plane of the orbit) is required. This, however, must 
again be qualified as + or - . (In the case of angles, we 
agree to call them + when they are measured in the 
opposite direction to that of the motion of the hands of a 
watch; that is, when they are described in the same 
sense as that in which the northern regions of the earth 
turn about the polar axis.) Angular velocity in one plane 
(i.e. rate at which the radius-vector turns) is similarly 
characterised. 

In aU cases where motion is restricted to one line the 
same thing holds. Thus the position of a pendulum is 
at every instant completely assigned by the angle the 
rod makes with the vertical, provided we are also told on 
which side the displacement is. 

The record kept by a self-acting tide-gauge gives at 
any instant the elevation or depression (again + and ) 
of the water above or below the mean level. Similarly 
with registering barometers, thermometers, etc. But, 
for the full appreciation of the indications of these 
records, they are usually made in two dimensions by the 
use of an important principle which will presently be 
explained. (68.) 

66. In what precedes we have been dealing with a 
kind of space in which the only displacements are 
forward or backward ; nothing is possible (nor even con- 
ceivable) sideways or upwards. 

This characteristic applies to Time, as well as to space 



56 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

of one dimension, and therefore we should expect to find, 
as we do find, that (with the necessary change of a word 
or two) all that has just been said with reference to relative 
position is true of events in time, as well as of points in 
one-dimensional space. There is no such thing as motion 
or displacement in time, so that this part of the analogy 
is wanting. Every event has its definite epoch, for ever 
unalterable. And of course there is no going sideways or up- 
wards, as it were, out of the one-dimensional course of time. 

Thus we find that to assign definitely the position of 
an event in time, provided our origin is assigned, all 
we need know is a single number (a multiplier of the 
time-unit) with its sign, + or - , signifying time after or 
time before that origin. 

Our usually adopted origin is the Christian era, and 
we speak of 1899 A. D. as the present year [I leave these 
dates as written. W. P.], while the date of the battle of 
Marathon is recorded as 490 B.C. The difference between 
the characteristics A.D. and B.C. is of precisely the same 
nature as that between north and south, or + and . 

Hence, if we wish to find the interval between the 
present time and the battle of Marathon, we have to 
subtract +1899 (the position of the new origin) from 
- 490. The result is - 2389, i.e. Marathon was fought 
2389 years ago. Thus to change the origin, or epoch, 
we must perform precisely the same operation as that 
which gave us the table in 63, from the first table in 
62. Similarly, to change our system of chronology to 
the year of the world (designated by A.M.) or to the old 
Roman (marked A.U.C.), all we need do is to subtract from 
each date (A.D. or B.C., regarded as + and - respectively) 
the assumed date of the creation of the world (4004 B.C.) 
or of the foundation of the city of Rome (753 B.C.). 



TIME AND SPACE. 57 

We need say no more on such a matter. Every intel- 
ligent reader can make new and varied examples for 
himself. 

67. Passing next to space of two dimensions, whether 
plane or spherical, we see at once from a map, or a globe, 
that the position of a place is given by two numbers, its 
Latitude and Longitude. But each of these has to be 
qualified for definiteness by the + or - sign, or something 
equivalent. Thus we have K or S. latitude, and E. or 
W. longitude. 

But there are two methods, specially applicable to the 
plane, which deserve closer attention in view not only of 
their intrinsic usefulness, but also of their bearing on the 
general question of tridimensional space. These are known 
in geometry as Rectangular and Polar co-ordinates. 

68. In the first we assume two reference lines at right 
angles to one another, both passing through the origin, 
and assign the position of a point by giving its distances 
from these two lines. These distances are looked on as 
drawn towards the point from either line, and each there- 
fore changes sign when the point is taken on the other 
side of the corresponding reference line. This is symbol- 
ised in the cut. Ox, Oy are the two reference lines, the 
origin. The perpendiculars PM, PN, let fall from P on 
these lines, completely, and without ambiguity, define its 
position. For if we know OM or NP, the # of P, i.e. its 
distance from Oy, that condition alone limits our choice 
for P to points lying in PM, a line drawn parallel to 
Oy and everywhere at the assigned distance, x, from it. 
Similarly, y being given as ON or MP, the choice 
of points is limited to those on the line NP, all of which 
have this property. 

But two lines at right angles to each other must 



58 



PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 



intersect, and in one point only. Thus the point P is 
determined by the conditions without ambiguity. 



-X 



X 



FIG, 2. 

If P lie to the left of Oy, its x is negative ; if below 
Ox, its y is negative. The lettering in the cut, at the ends 
of the lines bounding the four quadrants, shows at a glance 
the signs of x and y when P is situated in any one of them. 

In general, any given relation, between the x and y of 
a point, limits its position to a definite Curve in the plane 
of the reference lines. It is often very convenient to 
represent such a relation by a curve ; and, in fact, most 
self-registering instruments actually trace such a curve 
for us. Thus, if intervals of time (as OM) measured 
from a definite instant (represented by 0) be laid off 
along Ox, with the corresponding heights of the thermo- 
meter, barometer, tide, etc., erected as perpendiculars 
(MP) at their extremities, we have (as the Locus of P) a 
curve showing the mode in which temperature, pressure 
of the atmosphere, etc., change as time goes on. But 
such curves can be traced by a pencil attached to the 
instrument, or by photographic processes, on a long band 



TIME AND SPACE. 50 

of paper which is drawn horizontally past it, at a uniform 
rate, by clockwork. 

69. In the second method mentioned in 67 the data 
are the length of OP (the radius-vector), and the magni- 
tude of < MOP (the angle-vector), 65. These are usually 
denoted by r and 9, respectively. Here r is always taken 
as a positive (or rather a signless) quantity, while 6 is posi- 
tive if it be measured round from Ox counter-clockwise. 

This is the method adopted by a surveyor when, with a 
chain and a theodolite, he measures a field. His reference 
line, Ox, is usually given by a magnetic needle attached to 
the theodolite. He measures the angle a;OP and the dis- 
tance OP, P being a corner (let us say) of the field. These 
two data, determined for each prominent part of the bound- 
ary, enable him to plot the field ; and therefore contain all 
the necessary numerical data for calculating its area, etc. 

It is also the method usually employed in dealing with 
orbital motion of any kind in one plane. 

Comparing the two methods, we see that the directed 
line OP may be resolved (as it is called) into OM and 
MP, lines in directions perpendicular to one another. 
Also that this resolution, in any direction, is effected by 
means of the cosine of the angle involved. 

< 
For x = OM = OP cos zOP = r cos 6, 

< 
y= MP = OP cos ?/OP = r sin 6. 

It is clear that, though we have hitherto spoken of 
and P as the simultaneous positions of two points, we 
may look on them as successive positions of one (moving) 
point. If we look on the displacement as having been 
produced uniformly, and in one second, it represents in 
magnitude and direction the Velocity of the moving 



60 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

point ; and OM, MP represent, on the same scale, its 
resolved parts or components, parallel to Ox and O?/. 

These components are entirely independent of one 
another, so that to compound two or more displacements 
or velocities we have only to resolve each into its east- 
ward and its northward components, and deal with these 
respectively by the ordinary algebraic process, to obtain 
the corresponding components of the resultant. 

70. As examples, we give one or two results which 
will be specially useful to us in later chapters. 

If a point be moving, in any manner whatever, we may 
consider its velocity alone, independent altogether of the 
actual path pursued. Here we are introduced to a new 
idea, that of Acceleration. For, as velocity is rate of 
change of position, acceleration is rate of change of 
velocity. 

Take any fixed point, 0, and let OP represent, in 
magnitude and direction, the velocity of the moving 

point. After one unit of 
time let the velocity be 
represented by OP X ; after 
two units, by OP 2 ; and 
so on. It is clear that all 
the points P, P v P 2 , etc., 
lie on some definite curve, 
which will be the more 

accurately traced the greater the number of points we 
obtain in any assigned portion of it ; i.e. the smaller we 
assume our unit of time. If the motion whose properties 
are thus studied be that of a particle of matter, this 
curve (which is called the Hodograpli) is necessarily 
continuous, for the velocity cannot alter by starts ( 120) 
either in magnitude or in direction. And, as OP passes 




TIME AND SPACE. 61 

to a proximate position, OQ, by having a velocity PQ 
compounded with it, the Acceleration of OP is the 
velocity with which P moves in its curve. If the path 
be a plane curve, the hodograph is also plane. 

This construction enables us at once to solve a number 
of elementary problems in kinematics, which will be of 
great use to us in the sequel. 

In 64 above, we showed that the dimensions of speed 
(V) are 



In precisely the same way we see that those of accelera- 
tion (A) are 



Thus the numerical measure of acceleration is diminished 
in proportion as the unit of linear space is increased : 
but is increased in the duplicate ratio of that of the time 
unit. 

An acceleration of 1 foot per second, per second, is 
obviously the same as 3600 feet per minute, per minute. 

71. Suppose a point to move uniformly, with speed V, 
in a circle of radius R. OP in the hodograph (Fig. 3) 
has constant length V, and its direction rotates uniformly. 
Hence the hodograph is another circle, also uniformly 
described in the same sense (i.e. clockwise or counter- 
clockwise), and in the same period of time. Hence the 
speed of P must be such that it describes a circle of 
radius V, in the time that a point whose speed is V takes 
to go round a circle of radius R. It must, therefore, be 
V 2 /R. Also the direction of this speed is perpendicular 
to OP, and therefore along the radius of the first circle. 
And its direction is towards the centre of that circle, 



62 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

because both circles are described clockwise, or counter- 

clockwise. 

Let, now, the figure repre- 
sent the circle of radius R, 
and draw any diameter, ACA'. 
Then N moves round with 
speed V, and the acceleration of 
its motion is V 2 /R along NC. 
Remembering that accelerations 
and velocities are resolved like 
lines, we see that if NM be 

drawn perpendicular to AA', the speed of the point M 

along MC will be 

V MN 
NO' 
and its acceleration along MC, and towards C, will be 




R CN = JR 2 ^ M * 

The motion of M, thus defined, is called Simple Har- 
monic. It obviously consists in a vibration back and 
forward along the line AA', the speed being greatest at 
C, and vanishing at A and A'. The special characteristic 
is that the acceleration is always directed towards C, and 
is proportional to the displacement of M from that point. 

72. If we use Newton's Fluxional Notation, in which 
the rate at which a quantity increases per unit of time 
is expressed by putting a dot over the symbol for that 
quantity, a second dot placed over it will signify the rate 
at which that rate increases, and so on. 

Thus, if CM above be denoted by x, the speed of M is 
x, and its acceleration is x. And we see ab once from the 
result of last section that 



TIME AND SPACE. 68 

the negative sign being prefixed because while x is directed 
to the right in the figure, the acceleration is directed to 
the left, and conversely. Whenever, in future chapters, 
we meet with a relation of this kind, we will, therefore, 
interpret it as expressing simple harmonic motion. The 
multiplier of the right-hand side depends only on the ratio 
of V to E : what is called ( 65) the angular velocity of 
the radius-vector CN. If we denote this by w, the equa- 
tion may be written 

X = -u?x; 

an equation which belongs to all simple harmonic motions, 
whatever be their range of vibration, provided the angular 
velocity in the corresponding unform circular motion be 
(o, or the period of a complete revolution 27r/o>. Any such 
motion is therefore fully described by 

05 = a COS. 



where a and a are absolutely arbitrary. 

73. The result above was obtained by projecting uni- 
form circular motion on a diameter of the circle, or, what 
comes to the same thing, on a plane perpendicular to the 
plane of the circle. 

But an exceedingly interesting result is obtained by 
projecting the circular motion on any other plane. In 
orthogonal projection equal areas are projected into equal 
areas, and a circle is projected into an ellipse whose centre 
is the projection of the centre of the circle. 

Hence the projection gives motion in an ellipse, the 
radius-vector drawn from the centre of the ellipse tracing 
out equal areas in equal times, and the acceleration being 
still directed inwards along the radius-vector, and still 
bearing the same proportion to it. 

74. Another extremely useful result may be obtained 



64 



PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 



by supposing the unform angular velocity in the circle 
to be maintained, but with a continual shrinking of the 
radius at a rate measured (per second) by K times its 
length at each instant. 

The velocity of the moving point is thus made up of 
two components, one along the circle, the other along the 
radius, each proportional to the radius. Hence the path 
is a spiral which makes a constant angle with the radius, 
what is called the Equiangular, or Logarithmic, Spiral. 
The radius- vector still revolves uniformly. 1 

Let PB be the spiral, SP any radius. Then, if PT be 




FIG. 5. 



the velocity of P, and a the (constant) angle between its 
direction and that of PS, we see at once that 



whence 



PT sin a = o>SP, PT cos a = /cSP, 
K = <a cot a. 



If SO be equal and parallel to PT, Q is a point in the 
hodograph. But as PT, and therefore SQ, is proportional 
to SP, and the angle QSP is the supplement of a, the 
hodograph is the same spiral rotated through a given 
angle, and altered in its linear dimensions by the factor 

Thus the holograph of the hodograph is another 



l Proc. K.S.E., December 19, 1867. 



riME AND SPACE. 65 

similar spiral, again turned through the same angle, and 

with its radii altered in the ratio ( -^ ) . If PU be 

\sm a/ 

drawn, making an angle a with TP produced backwards, 
and meeting QS in U, it will therefore be the direction of 
acceleration at P. 

But PU may be resolved into PS, SU, the first of 
which is along the radius-vector, the second parallel to 
the tangent at P. The parts of the acceleration in these 
directions are, respectively, 



The latter of these, by the first equation above, may be 
written as 

2(^-yPT slnaCOSa ~2c, cota.PT-2PT. 
\sm a/ < 

Hence the motion of P is due to an acceleration along, 
and proportional to the length of, PS, and another along, 
and proportional to the length of, TP. 

And of course the resolved part of the motion along 
any line in the plane possesses the same characteristics. 
If x represent the distance between the projections of S 
and of P, on such a line, we see at once that we have 

r- 2 
x= -2ocoto. x- 



-S- 
Sin 2 a 

or, introducing the value of K above, 



This differs from the equation for simple harmonic 
motion ( 72) by the term involving K, whose physical 
interpretation (when it is multiplied by the mass of the 
oscillating particle) is a resistance proportional to the 
speed of the motion. But the preceding investigation 

E 



66 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

shows us that an equation of this form represents the 
resolved part (in some definite direction) of uniform 
circular motion with angular velocity to, the radius of the 
circle shrinking in each second by the fraction K of its 
amount. (This is the same thing as saying that its 
logarithm diminishes by K in unit of time.) Or we may 
call it simple harmonic motion whose scale is constantly 
diminishing at a definite rate. 

This special case of motion is fully described by the 
equation 



Compare the result of 72. 

75. The step to three-dimensional space is now easy. 
We will take it from a somewhat altered point of view. 
Our reference system is now three planes at right angles 
to one another ; say the floor, the north wall, and the 
west wall of a room, the corner in which these three meet 
being for the time our origin. 

And the position of a point is determined without 
ambiguity if we know its distances from these planes, 
with the proper sign of each. 

For, knowing only its distance from the floor, we limit 
it to the horizontal plane which is everywhere at that 
distance from the floor. Similarly the second condition 
limits it to a definite plane parallel to the north wall. 
These two conditions together limit it to a certain hori- 
zontal line lying east and west. The third condition 
limits it to a certain plane parallel to the west wall ; and 
this is intersected in one point, and one only, by the east 
and west line just mentioned. That one is the sole point 
which satisfies all three conditions. 

Thus, let represent the origin, yOz the north wall, 



TIME AND SPACE. 



67 



zOx the west wall, and xOy the floor. The figure is 
drawn as seen by an eye equidistant from these three 
planes, and in the room, i.e. on the positive side of each 
of them. And it will be noticed that the lettering, x, y, z 
of the ends of the edges, which meet in 0, is so applied 
that rotation from Ox to Oy, from Oy to Oz, and from 
Oz to Ox again, will all alike appear to be counterclock- 
wise. 




The position of any point, P, is then found thus : 
Draw PIS' perpendicular to the floor, meeting it in N ; 
thence NM perpendicular to Ox. Then OM = ic is the 
distance of P from the north wall ; MN = y is its distance 
from the west wall ; and JSTP = z is its distance from the 
floor. 

If P assume a new position which requires it to pass 
through any one of these planes, the corresponding co- 



68 PKOPERTIES OF MATTER. 

ordinate changes sign ; if it pass through an edge (i.e. 
the intersection of two of these planes) two co-ordinates 
change sign ; and if it pass through (where the three 
planes meet) all three co-ordinates become negative. 
This is illustrated by the negative lettering at the (dotted) 
prolongation of each edge through 0. 

76. But, in analogy with the second method of 69, 
we see that the position of P will be fully specified if 
we know the vertical plane through in which it lies 
(i.e. the plane zON), the angle NOP in that plane, and 
the length of OP. The first is determined if we know 
the angle xON. Hence we determine P by its distance 
from 0, and two angles which (together) enable us to 
assign the direction of OP. The angle icON is called the 
Azimuth of the plane zQN ; let us denote it by 0. The 
angle NOP is called the Altitude of P, as seen from ; 
let us denote it by <. Also let the length of OP be, as 
before, called r. 

Comparing, as before, the results of the two methods, 
we see that ON = r cos <f>, and therefore 

x = OM = ON cos 6 = r cos Q cos 6, 
y = MN = ON sin = r cos <p sin 0, 
z = NP =rsinp. 

The elements of spherical trigonometry show that the 
multipliers of r, in the values of x, y, z respectively, are 
the cosines of the angles between the line OP and the 
lines Ox, Oy, Oz. Hence the more symmetrical method, 
in which these cosines are represented by I, m, n respec- 
tively, gives 

x = rl, y^rm, z = rn, 

with the condition 



TIME AND SPACE. 69 

It is easy to see that the remark in 69, as to resolu- 
tion of a velocity in two dimensions, holds with respect 
to three. 

Then Newton's Second Law of Motion (Chap. VI.) at 
once extends these conclusions to Forces. 

77. A remark of great importance must be made here. 
We saw in 68 that a point was determined, in x, y co- 
ordinates (i.e. plane space of two dimensions), as the 
intersection of two straight lines, to one of which it was 
confined by its x being given in value, to the other by 
the value of its y. But any two independent conditions 
connecting x and y will, also, determine their values. A 
single condition connecting x and y is known as the 
Equation of a Curve, and, when given, limits the position 
of P to that curve. Two such conditions, therefore, give 
P by the intersection of two curves, on each of which it 
must lie. Such a condition applied to a physical particle 
is called a Degree of Constraint. In two-dimensional 
space a free particle has but two Degrees of Freedom, one 
of which is removed by each degree of constraint to which 
it is subjected. 

78. Similarly we saw that, in three dimensions, the 
point given by x, y, z is determined as the intersection of 
three planes, on each of which it must lie. But any one 
condition connecting the values of x, y, and z is the 
Equation of a Surface, and, when it is given, a particle 
at the point is subjected to one degree of constraint. 
When free, it has but three degrees of freedom ; and thus 
three degrees of constraint, by completely determining its 
x, y, and z, fix its position. 

We should arrive at the same result by considering 
relations among the r, 0, <f> co-ordinates. But it suffices 
to consider merely what species of constraint each of 



70 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

these imposes when its value is given. All points for 
which r has a given value lie on a sphere whose centre is 
at 0. When is given, the point must lie somewhere 
in the vertical plane zOK When < is given, it must lie 
somewhere on a right cone of which is the vertex and 
Oz the axis. 

[The two latter statements are easily illustrated by 
means of a telescope, mounted (in the common way) on 
a stand which allows it to rotate either about a horizontal, 
or about a vertical, axis. Place it in any azimuth, and 
vary its altitude, it turns in a vertical plane about the 
horizontal axis. Place it at any altitude, and vary its 
azimuth, it rotates conically about the vertical axis. 
Hence, by means of these co-ordinates, or conditions, 
each definite point in its axis is constrained to lie on a 
sphere, a plane, and a cone, simultaneously.] 

79. Two devices are in common use for enabling us to 
represent, on a plane (or other space of two dimensions) 
the third dimension. 

Thus, in an Admiralty chart, we find the sea-area 
marked over with figures denoting Soundings : i.e. the 
average depth of the water at certain places is written in 
in fathoms. These soundings are of course more numerous 
in regions where there are shoals or intricate channels. 
But it is obvious that, if they were numerous enough, 
they would enable us to construct a model of the sea- 
bottom. The soundings, therefore, supply, as it were, 
the necessary third dimension. But this process, though 
usually sufficient for purposes of navigation, is at best a 
rude and incomplete one. 

The other method, however, rises to a very high order 
of scientific importance, not merely from the point of view 
for which it was originally devised, but on account of the 



TIME AND SPACE. 71 

extent to which its essential principles are now applied 
throughout the whole range of physics. We therefore 
devote some space to its full explanation. 

80. This is called the method of Contour Lines, and is 
employed with great effect in the best maps, such as those 
of the Ordnance Survey. 

A contour line passes through all places which are at the 
same height above the sea-level. 

Thus the sea-margin is itself the contour line of no 
elevation. Suppose the water to rise one foot (vertically). 
There would be a new sea-margin, in general encroaching 
more on the land than the former ; encroaching most at 
places where the beach has the gentlest slope, not encroach- 
ing at all on a perpendicular cliff, and thrust out (seawards) 
from an overhanging cliff. This is the contour line of one 
foot elevation. It is clear that by supposing a gradual 
rise of the sea, or subsidence of the land, foot by foot, 
we could obtain a series of curves (each in its turn a 
sea-margin) gradually circumscribing the uncovered portion 
of the land, and finally closing in over its highest peak. 
We require no such natural convulsion as that just im- 
agined. Cloud strata, or fog-banks, with definite horizontal 
surfaces, constantly show us these appearances in hilly 
countries. But it is a simple matter of Levelling to trace 
out contour lines, and to draw them on a map of the 
district. For practical purposes it is usually sufficient to 
draw them for every 50 or 100 feet of additional elevation 
above the sea-level. 

The celebrated Parallel Roads of Glen Roy are merely 
contour lines, etched on the sides of the valley by long- 
continued but slight agitation of the margin of the water 
which filled the glen to various depths in succession, as the 
barriers which dammed it ut> were, at intervals, broken down. 



72 



PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 



Eeferring to 78, we see that a surface can be fully 
described in terms of one relation among x, y, and z. Let 
the plane of Oar, Oy, be that of the sea-level, and let the 
relation expressing the surface of the land be 

f(x, y, s) = 0. 

Then the contour lines, as traced on the (two-dimension) 
map are the curves 

f(x, y, 0)-0, 
f(x t y, 100) = 0, 
f(x, y, 200) = 0, etc. 

81. To familiarise the student with the general appear- 




FIG. 7. 



ance of contour lines, and their relation to the form of the 
corresponding surface, we give those of a right cone whos^ 



TIME AND SPACE. 73 

axis is vertical, of a hemisphere, and of a fusiform or 
spindle-shaped body. 

The fusiform body, whose contour lines are drawn, is 
formed by the rotation of a quadrant of a circle about a 
vertical tangent, the point of contact being the apex. 
And the contour lines are drawn, in each case, at suc- 
cessive heights increasing by one-fifth of the whole height 
of the figure. Thus the distances between successive 
contours, in the two last figures, form the same series of 
values, but in opposite order. 

The equality of distance between the successive contour 
lines of the cone indicates uniform steepness throughout. 
In the hemisphere the lines are closer together near the 
boundary of the figure, in the spindle they close in on one 
another towards the centre ; the hemisphere being steepest 
at its edges, and the spindle surface steeper towards the 
point. 

82. In fact, the Gradient of a surface in any direction 
(i.e. the amount of rise per horizontal foot) is obviously, 
at any point, inversely as the distance in that direction 
between successive contour lines, for they are traced at 
successive equal differences of level ; and thus the dis- 
tance between them, along any line drawn on the map, 
is the space by which we must advance horizontally 
along that line while ascending or descending vertically 
through 100 feet. 

83. The line of steepest slope at any point of a surface 
is, of course, perpendicular to each contour line where it 
meets it. For the contour line is horizontal, i.e. has nc 
slope. And in the projection on a horizontal plane this 
perpendicularity remains. Thus the line of greatest slope 
at any point is represented on the map by the shortest 
line which can be drawn from that point to the nearest 



74 



PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 



contour line. It is the path along which a drop of water 
would trickle down. It is therefore called a Stream-line. 
84. If the surface be like that of a saddle (concave up- 
wards along the horse's back, convex upwards across it), 
we have at the middle of the saddle what is called, in 
geography, a Col or mountain-pass : the lowest point 
of the ridge between two neighbouring summits. The 
characteristic of the col is that, at such a point, a contour 
line intersects itself. The following sketch shows the 
general form of the contours near such a point. 




FIG. 8. 

In the shaded regions depicted to the right and left oi 
the col the ground rises, in the unshaded regions depicted 
above and below it falls. [The figures on the contour 
lines show their order of altitude above the sea-level.] 

Other very special peculiarities might be mentioned, 
but they are not necessary for the beginner; and the 
more mathematical reader can easily work them out for 
himself. 1 

iSee Cayley, Phil. Mag., XVIII. 264 (1859); Clerk-Maxwell, 
Ibid., December 1870. 



TIME AND SPACE. 76 

85. If we draw, by the help of the contour lines, the 
stream-lines (which, 83, cut them at right angles), we 
find that they have the following property. In regions 
above the level of a col, they fall away on both sides from 
that particular one of their number which passes from a 
mountain Summit down to the col, and thence up to the 
neighbouring summit. This particular line, then, is the 
Watershed, separating two valleys or drainage areas. If 
we follow the course of the stream-lines into regions below 
the col, we find that they usually approach to the special 
stream-lines drawn downwards from the col on opposite 
sides. These will therefore be fed by all the little rills 
in succession, and thus they become the Watercourses. 
A watercourse is thus the stream-line drawn from a col so 
as to pass through an Imit, or lowest point of the surface. 

If we were to take a cast from a model of a surface 
(with its contour lines) and treat it as a model of another 
surface, contour lines would remain contour lines, and 
stream-lines stream-lines ; but summits would become 
imits, and imits summits, while watercourses would 
become watersheds, and conversely. 

86. So far, we have been dealing with contour lines in 
the ordinary sense of the word. But essentially the same 
sort of thing is presented by the meteorological curves 
called Isobars, and by Isothermals, Lines of Equal Magnetic 
Variation, of Equal Dip, etc. etc. In each case the lines 
are drawn, on a two-dimension map, so as to pass through 
all places where the barometer, or the thermometer, stands 
at a given reading or level, where the compass deviates a 
given amount from true north, etc. etc. Thus they have 
a characteristic similar to that of contour lines, viz. that 
all points on any one line possess some definite property 
to exactly the same amount. These applications of the 



76 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

principle are of great importance, but they do not belong 
so immediately to our subject as do others, of which we 
will now give an example or two. 

87. Just as water trickles from places at higher, to 
others at lower, level, and as heat flows, in a conducting 
body, from places of higher, to others of lower, tempera- 
ture, so electricity is said to flow from places of higher, to 
places of lower, potential. Hence, to study the flow of 
electricity in a sheet of metal, we require to know the 
lines of equal potential. 

The first investigation of this subject, by Kirchhoff, 1 
supplies an exceedingly simple and beautiful example. 

Putting the wires attached to the ends of a galvanic 
battery into contact with a very large sheet of uniform 
tinfoil, at points A and B, (Fig. 9) we establish and main- 
tain a definite difference of potential between those points 
of the sheet. Hence there is a steady flow of electricity 
from the one to the other; and it must take place, at 
every point, in a direction perpendicular to the equi- 
potential line passing through that point. Thus, to find 
the lines of flow of electricity, we must have a means of, 
as it were, contouring the plate electrically, and finding 
its lines of equal potential. This is furnished by a 
galvanometer, for that instrument indicates at once any 
current passing through its coil of wire. But, if the 
ends of its coil be kept at equal potentials, no current 
will pass. Hence, if we put one end of the galvanometer 
coil in contact with the tinfoil at any point, P, and move 
the other end about on the foil until no current passes, 
the point, Q, with which it is then in contact, is at the 
same potential as P. By fishing about, therefore, we 
can, point by point, trace out the equipotential line PQ 
1 Pogg. Ann., 1845, Ixiv. 



78 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

passing through P. And the same may be done for 
other points, till we have covered the tinfoil with as many 
lines of this kind as we desire. 

In the special case which we have taken, it was found 
that when the plate of tinfoil is very large in comparison 
with the length AB, these lines are circles, whose centres 
lie in the line AB, and in each of which the ratio 
BQ/AQ is the same throughout (see 141); though of 
course its values are different for different circles of the 
series. A few of these circles are given (in full lines) 
in the figure. [To ensure proper contact with the battery, 
little circular discs of copper (indicated in white) are 
attached to the tinfoil at A and B. The edges of these 
discs (on account of the superior conductivity of the 
copper) are (practically) equipotential lines, but the points 
A and B are not exactly at their centres.] 

Now geometry tells us that the lines, which cut at 
right angles all circles drawn according to the above 
law, belong to another series of circles : viz. those 
which are determined by the condition that each passes 
through the two points A and B. These circles (some 
of which are represented by the dotted lines in the 
figure) are therefore the current lines along which the 
electricity passes in the tinfoil. 

The full circles are drawn for successive equal changes 
of potential ; and the dotted circles which are drawn 
are so selected that the amount of electricity which 
flows in a given time through the space bounded by 
portions of each contiguous pair is the same. If the 
full lines be regarded as contour lines of a surface, and if 
A be connected with the positive pole of the battery, the 
left hand side of the figure represents a hill, and the right 
hand an exactly equal and similar hollow ; so that the 



TIME AND SPACE. 79 

halves, as separated by the single straight contour line, 
would exactly fit into one another if the whole could be 
folded along that line. [This illustrates the last paragraph 
of 85.] 

If both A and B be connected with the positive pole 
of the battery, and its negative pole be connected with 
a massive ring of copper, or other good conductor, which 
borders the sheet of tinfoil all round at a very great 
distance from A and B, the equipotential lines are what 
mathematicians call Cassini's Ovals. One of them is the 
Lemniscate of Bernoulli, and its double point corresponds 
to a col. The figure resembles in general form that of 
84, and the current lines are a series of rectangular 
hyperbolas. 

88. As a final example, somewhat more pertinent to 
our present work, take the relation between the pressure, 
volume, and absolute temperature, of a given mass of air. 

Experiment has proved that when any two of these 
three quantities are given, the third is determined. 
Calling them p, v, and t respectively, the relation between 
them is (nearly enough for our present purpose) found 
to be represented by the expression 

pv=Rt. . . . . . (1) 

where R is a known constant quantity. [In a later 
chapter we will study the precise relation. What we seek 
at present is an illustration of method, -not a specially 
exact representation of fact.~\ 

Now we may treat p, v, and t just as we treated x, y, z 
in 80 above. In this statement lies the essence of the 
value of the contour-line idea as applied to questions of 
general physics. 

Thus the experimental relation among p, v, t, (1) above, 



80 



PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 



may be looked on as the equation of a surface. Let us 
draw its contour lines on the plane in which p and v are 
measured. 

Equation (1) shows that these lines (three of which are 
marked in the figure with their temperatures t lt t 2 , 3 ,) are 
all rectangular hyperbolas, of which the asymptotes are 
the axes of volume and pressure, Ov and Op. Any line 
of equal pressure Av-jV^Vf is divided by them so that 




FIG. 10. 



Av 2 , Av s , etc., are proportional to the absolute 



temperatures. So with a line of equal volume 
And one special advantage of this mode of representation 
is, that the work required to. compress the gas at any con- 
stant temperature, as t lt from volume OB' to volume OB, 
is given by the area B'j9 / 1 ^? 1 B, which is contained between 
the curve t lt the axis of volume, and the lines of equal 



TIME AND SPACE. 81 

volume B'p'v Bp r This follows at once from the fact 
that the work done during an elementary change of 
volume dv, under pressure p, is represented by pdv ; a 
little element of area bounded by the curve, the axis of 
v, and two contiguous ordinates. 

Draw a tangent PT to one of these curves at a point 
P, and draw PQ parallel to Ov. The compressibility of 
a gas, at constant temperature, is the fractional change 
of volume per unit increase of pressure. It is therefore 
represented by 

5? . J_ or -L 
QT OM' QT' 

or (by a property of the hyperbola) , 

i.e. it is inversely as the pressure. 

The expansibility, at constant pressure, is found simi- 
larly by producing QP to cut the proximate curve t 2 in 
E, ; for it is expressed by the fractional change of volume 
per unit rise of temperature, that is 

J_ or WH>) OM J_ 1 
OM ' ti-ti ZjOM ' tz-ti *!* 

This is a mere portion of what is called, in Thermo- 
dynamics, "Watt's Diagram of Energy, the whole of which 
is an application of the contour idea. 

89. We must now, as promised in 59, say a few 
words as to a (possible 1) fourth dimension of space. 

Let us treat this from the point of view of what we 
may imagine weuld be the experience of beings, endowed 
with something corresponding to human reason and 
human senses, but inhabiting space of one or of two 
dimensions. 

In one-dimensional space the inhabitants can have 

F 



82 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

length only, and have absolutely no hint from experience 
of what another dimension could be. Yet we might 
imagine them, if they were not mere points, to experi- 
ence some perfectly novel, and to them unaccountable, 
sensation in passing from part to part of their space 
if its curvature were not everywhere tfa same. Suppose, 
for instance, their space to be a line with knots on it. 

Similarly, an inhabitant of two-dimensional space (a 
bookworm, as Sylvester once called him) might, even if 
his dimensions were both finite, pass from place to place 
in a plane or a spherical space without feeling any new 
sensation. But, if a part of his space were creased or 
folded, he might be imagined to feel some strange sensa- 
tion while he passed through such a part. This is a 
question of surface-curvature, which would be totally 
unintelligible to a being whose experience (limited to 
two dimensions) had not prepared him for it. 

So, if there should be a fourth dimension, our three- 
dimensioned space may appear to a four-dimensional 
observer to have something analogous to curvature or 
creasing ; and if, in the course of our solar system's rapid 
progress through space, we should come to a region of 
that kind, we may fancy that some absolutely novel form 
of experience would be the result. 

90. Speculations of this nature, however, though based 
to a certain extent on scientific facts, necessarily involve 
the question of sensation or perception ; and, in so far as 
they do so, they pass from the domain of physical science 
into the realms of Physiology. 



CHAPTER Y. 

IMPENETRABILITY, POROSITY, DIVISIBILITY. 

91. OUR working definition of matter ( 21) involves 
another property besides those discussed in last chapter 
viz. Impenetrability. The sense in which we are to 
understand this term depends upon the use of the word 
occupy as applied to space. 

On the theory of ultimate atoms, whether the old 
hard atom ( 23) or the vortex atom ( 27), the occupa- 
tion of space is complete so far as each atom is concerned. 
Where one atom is, it fills space to the absolute exclusion 
of every other. But space is not continuously filled by 
the atoms of any portion of tangible matter ( 24) ; hence 
there may be mixtures of atoms of different kinds, which 
will be the more perfect and intimate the smaller we 
suppose the individual atoms to be. But there is no use 
in discussing questions of this kind, at least until we 
prove the existence of atoms. Thus the strictly scientific 
use of the term impenetrability need not occupy us. 

92. There is, however, a semi-scientific use of the word 
which is of considerable importance. For, whether matter 
be impenetrable in the strict sense or not, we may use- 
fully discuss the consequences of its not being penetrated. 
Thus the hollow of a mould, and only the hollow, is 



84 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

accessible to the liquid metal poured into it. Otherwise 
"casting" would be impossible. 

One of the most important of these consequences was 
long ago given by Archimedes, viz. an easy mode of 
comparing the volumes of bodies of shapes so irregular or 
complex as to defy the powers of calculators working 
from mere linear measurements. All that is required is 
to immerse them successively in a vessel partly filled with 
water, and to note the amount by which the level of the 
water is disturbed, i.e. (in the usual phrase) the amount 
of water displaced. Bodies which, when thus tried, 
displace equal amounts of water have equal volumes, 
however different may be their figures and materials. 

93. Hence, to measure the volume of an irregularly^ 
shaped body : a lump of stone or coal, for instance : 
grease it or varnish it all over, to prevent water from 
entering its pores, i.e. to secure non-penetration ; and im- 
merse it completely in water which partially fills a vessel. 
Mark the height to which the water-level rises. With- 
draw the stone, and pour in mercury until the same 
disturbance of water-level is again produced. The volume 
of the mercury is the same as that of the stone. The 
mercury has the advantage of taking at once the form of 
any vessel in which it may be placed, so that its volume 
may be promptly determined by pouring it into a properly 
graduated beaker. 

This simple consideration forms one of the bases of 
the common method of measuring specific gravity ( 36) 
by weighing a body, first in air, and then when it is 
suspended in water. 

94. But it is not solids (such as the stone above) or 
other liquids (such as mercury) alone which can thus 
displace their own bulk of water. Air will do equally 



IMPENETRABILITY DIVISIBILITY. 8B 

well. Thus a diving bell is merely an open-mouthed 
vessel, inverted and let down into water. The air it 
contains is not penetrated by the water, and thus dis- 
places (just as a solid or a liquid would have done) its own 
volume of water. Its volume, no doubt, becomes less as 
the bell descends under the water, but this is due to the 
increase of hydrostatic pressure to which it is subjected. 
Still, however it be compressed, as it is not penetrated 
it displaces at every instant its momentary bulk of water. 

95. When one liquid mixes with, or when it combines 
with another, it does not usually displace its own bulk of 
the other. In such cases there is something equivalent 
to interpenetration. 

Thus, when twenty-seven parts (by weight) of water 
are mixed with twenty-three of alcohol, the volume of 
the mixture is less by 3*6 per cent, than the sum of the 
volumes of the constituents. [Leslie.] 

When an alloy of tin and copper, such as used to be 
employed for the specula of large reflecting telescopes, is 
formed, the joint bulk may be as much as 7 or 8 per cent* 
less than the sum of the bulks of the constituents. 

And Faraday showed that, when potassium is oxidised, 
the resulting potash has a less volume than either of the 
constituents. 

96. But, as a rule, in these cases of contraction, other 
physical phenomena present themselves. Thus the mixture 
of alcohol and water above described becomes more than 
8 C. warmer than the components, if both were taken 
at the same (ordinary) temperature. A rod of tin dipped 
into melted copper (at a very dull red heat) produces vivid 
incandescence as it melts and is alloyed. And the com- 
bination of oxygen and potassium develops kinetic energy 
at an almost explosive rate. 



86 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

There are other cases, which we need not treat of here 
(especially as they belong properly to Heat and to 
Chemistry), in which the volume of a mixture is greater 
than the sum of the volumes of its constituents. 

97. These examples show that Archimedes' notable 
process might altogether have failed in its application. 
For he is said to have been asked to decide whether the 
votive crown made for Hiero of Syracuse really consisted 
of the amount of gold furnished for its manufacture, or 
whether a part of the gold had been abstracted, and its 
place supplied by an equal weight of silver. 

He procured lumps of silver and of gold, each equal in 
weight to the crown. These he immersed successively in 
a vessel filled to the brim with water, measuring in each 
case the amount of overflow, which he found to be greater 
for silver than for gold. The vessel being once more filled, 
the crown itself was immersed, and was found to displace 
more water than did the gold. Hence, by calculation, 
Archimedes found how much silver had been substituted 
for an equal weight of gold. 1 This calculation, of course, 
must have proceeded on the supposition that the bulk of 
the alloy was equal to the sum of the bulks of the com- 
ponent metals. 

But interpenetration, of which he had no knowledge, 
might have completely baffled the great mathematician. 

If a similar question were raised now, it would of course 
be decided at once by the processes of the chemist, not by 
those of the physicist. 

98. We have seen ( 24) that, on the hypothesis of 
hard atoms, there must necessarily be interstices between 
them, else bodies could not be compressible. 

But it is an experimental fact, independent of all 
1 The original passage is given as Appendix III. 



IMPENETRABILITY DIVISIBILITY. 87 

hypotheses, that bodies in general are Porous. By the 
term pores we do not refer to visible channels, such as 
those which run in all directions through a piece of sponge, 
but to microscopic channels, which pervade even the most 
seemingly homogenous and continuous substances, such as 
solid lead, silver, gold, etc. 

The proof that such channels exist was given experi- 
mentally by Bacon, who tried to compress water by 
squeezing or hammering a leaden shell filled with water 
and closed. The water exuded like perspiration through 
the pores of the lead. The Florentine Academicians tried 
the same experiment with a silver shell, but obtained the 
same result. They then tried to prevent the escape of 
the water by thickly gilding the shell, but again in vain. 

99. When a corner of a piece of blotting-paper, or of 
a lump of loaf-sugar, is dipped in water, we see (especially 
if the water be coloured) the rapid entrance it effects 
into the pores. Why it enters, under these conditions, is 
another question. (Chap. XII.) 

The porosity of wood, necessary for the circulation 
of the sap, is beautifully shown by the fact that, from 
microscopic examination of a thin slice of a fossil tree, a 
botanist can tell at once the species to which it belonged. 
The greater part of the material of the wood has dis- 
appeared for it may be millions of years, but its micro- 
scopic structure has been preserved by the infiltration of 
silicious or calcareous materials which, hardening in the 
pores, have thus preserved a perfect copy of the original. 
The rapid passage of gases through unglazed pottery, 
iron and (hot) steel, etc., shows the porosity of these 
bodies in a very remarkable manner. So does the strange 
absorption of hydrogen by a mass of palladium. (See 
Chapter XIII.) The porosity of steel has recently been 



88 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

shown in a most remarkable manner by Amagat, who 
forced mercury through a thickness of more than 3 inches 
under a pressure of at least 4000 atmospheres. ( 196.) 
The metal was quite impervious to glycerine under the 
same pressure. 1 

Another beautiful instance is afforded by the silicious 
concretion, Tdbasheer, found in the joints of sugar-canes. 
It is opaque when dry, but when immersed in water for 
a short time becomes transparent. Certain agates, called 
Hydroplianes, exhibit the same property. 

100. No decisive proof of the porosity of vitreous 
bodies, such as glass, seems yet to have been obtained. 
That they form almost a solitary class of exceptions to an 
otherwise general rule seems highly improbable. And 
instances, such as those given below, seem to indicate that 
these vitreous bodies have not yet been proved to be 
porous solely because we have not discovered the proper 
mode of testing them. 

When polished marble is wetted with water, very little 
enters the pores ; while oil, on the contrary, is rapidly 
absorbed. 

A bag of cambric or gauze, the holes in which are 
visible to the eye, holds mercury securely, until sufficient 
pressure is applied to force out the liquid. ( 288.) 

Glazed pottery-ware, which is practically impervious to 
hydrogen and to pure water, is rapidly penetrated by a 
strong aqueous solution of bichromate of potash. This 
solution, crystallising in the pores, disintegrates the whole, 
just as water, freezing in the pores of a rock, gradually 
breaks its surface-layers into small fragments, to be after- 
wards washed down to the plain as alluvial soil. 

The question of the porosity of colloidal bodies, such as 
1 Comptes Hendus, March 2, 1885. 



IMPENETRABILITY DIVISIBILITY. 89 

gelatine, albumen, and, from some points of view, india- 
rubber, is somewhat puzzling. We will refer to it in 
Chapter XIII. 

101. The Divisibility of matter, in the strict scientific 
sense, at once raises the question of the existence of finite 
atoms. For, if there be such atoms, division has them 
for its limit, whatever processes may be employed. 1 We 
are not prepared to face this aspect of the question, and 
must, therefore, confine ourselves to examples of extremely 
minute Division. 

An " impalpable " powder is one which gives no gritty 
sensation when we rub it between the thumb and fingers. 
The process of Levigation, depending on fluid friction 
( 38), is employed for the assortment of solid particles into 
packets of different degrees of fineness. Thus, if ground 
emery be thrown into a tall vessel full of water, we may 
remove from the bottom of the vessel successive crops, as 
it were, of gradually increasing fineness. Yet even the 
finest of these powders can be used for grinding metallic 
or glass surfaces, showing that its particles still possess 
properties similar to those of the coarser powders. 

Silica may be thrown down, by chemical processes, 
in such an extreme state of division that when it is dried 
and poured into a trough it behaves almost like a liquid. 
Especially when it is heated, we observe that, like a 
liquid, it is capable of propagating gravitation-waves. 
Calcined magnesia and other very fine powders show 
similar properties. 

102. Even the rough process of scratching the polished 
surface of glass with a diamond point can be carried out 
by machinery to such an extent of delicacy that groups 
of equidistant parallel lines may be traced, some of which 

1 See again Appendix II. 



90 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

can only be " resolved " into their components by the very 
best microscopes ; others, which we have every reason to 
believe capable of resolution, have not yet been resolved. 
These pieces of ruled glass are known to microscopists as 
Noberfs Test. 

Ordinary gold-leaf, though prepared by a very rough 
process, has a thickness of about l/300,000th of an inch 
only. But, as Faraday showed, it can be rendered very 
much thinner by immersion in a solvent such as cyanide 
of potassium. And, by a species of inversion of Wollaston's 
process ( 49), i.e. drawing into very fine wire a silver rod 
thickly gilt, we obtain a continuous film of gold, whose thick- 
ness is estimated at less than l/4,000,000th of an inch. 

103. The average size of the particles of water in a 
light cloud is easily estimated from the diameter of the 
coloured rings, or Coronce, which it produces when it 
covers the sun or moon. 1 If the radius of the innermost 
ring be 15, the diameter of the particles must be about 
1 /13,000th of an inch. Such must have been the average 
size of the dust particles from the Krakatao eruption of 
1883, which produced the remarkable sunsets, as well as 
the corona seen about the sun when no cloud was visible. 
The length of time these particles remained in suspension 
is accounted for in 40 above. 

104. Leslie, in his Natural Philosophy (1823), says: 
"A single grain of musk has been known to perfume a 
large room for the space of twenty years. Consider how 
often, during that time, the air of the apartment must 
have been renewed and have become charged with fresh 
odour ! At the lowest computation the musk had been 
subdivided into 320 quadrillions of particles, each of them 
capable of affecting the olfactory organs." Leslie does not 

1 Tait's Light, 3rd ed., 180, 246. 



IMPENETRABILITY DIVISIBILITY. 91 

tell us how the computation was made, nor even what we 
are to understand by quadrillions. 

[The usual British reckoning gives a quadrillion as a 
billion billions, each billion being a million millions, 
while the French reckoning makes it only a thousand 
million millions. This confusion is entirely removed 
by the modern mode of writing large numbers, when we 
know them only in rough approximation. We write the 
first two or three significant figures, and indicate the 
number of the remaining ones by the corresponding 
power of 10.] 

Thus Leslie may have meant either 320 x 10 24 , or 
320 x 10 15 . If, as is most probable, he meant the former 
of these numbers, the result of his computation has 
been singularly verified by recent discoveries, some of 
them apparently altogether unconnected with the question 
before us. 

105. One of the most striking instances of division is 
that furnished by holding, in an otherwise slightly 
luminous flame, a particle of common salt or of some 
other metallic chloride. Fox Talbot, in 1826, wrote : 
" A particle of muriate of lime on the wick of a spirit- 
lamp will produce a quantity of red and green rays for a 
whole evening without being itself sensibly diminished." 
Swan traced the source of the peculiar orange ray which 
appears in the light of almost every flame to the wide 
diffusion of exceedingly small quantities of common salt. 
These phenomena are nowadays known to all in connec- 
tion with Spectrum Analysis. The quantity of common 
salt which, for a considerable time, will continue to give 
the orange tinge to the flame of a large Bunsen lamp is 
minute in the extreme. The effect is now proved to be 
due to vapour of sodium. 



92 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

106. A conviction of the practically infinite divisibility 
of matter must be felt by all who would hold a warranted 
belief in the "dilutions" which are at least popularly 
supposed to be one of the main characteristics of homoeo- 
pathic medicines. When a single grain of atropine is 
dissolved in a gallon of water, and one drop of this is added 
to another gallon of water, we have what is called the 
first dilution. Add a drop of this to a third gallon of 
water, and we have the second dilution. And so on. 
Tenth dilutions are said to be sometimes administered. 
If we take the diameter of a drop as about l/8th of an 
inch, we find, by an easy calculation, that (as there are 
277 cubic inches in a gallon) the tenth dilution should 
contain about 2/1 60 of a grain of atropine per drop ! If 
that drop were magnified to the size of the whole earth, 
the atropine in it (magnified, of course, in proportion,) 
would correspond to a particle of somewhere about one 
three-billionth of an inch in diameter ! ! So that, unless 
atropine can be separated into particles of this excessive 
smallness, one drop of the so-called dilution will be totally 
different from another : one being (according to the pre- 
scriber's principles) a potent medicine, the other pure water ! 

107. The kinetic theory of gases informs us that, in 
a cubic inch of any gas at atmospheric pressure, and at 
ordinary temperatures, there are somewhere about 3 x 10 20 
detached particles absolutely similar and equal to one 
another. These cannot be Lucretian atoms, for they 
have each many different modes of vibration, even when 
they belong to a simple and not to a compound gas. 
Here we reach the limit of our present knowledge as to 
division of matter. What is the structure of these 
gaseous particles on which their vibrations depend ( 29), 
and how far further divisible each particle must be 



IMPENETRABILITY DIVISIBILITY. 93 

supposed in consequence, are matters beyond our know- 
ledge. [Knowledge on this point has greatly advanced 
since the above statement was made, see Chap. XV. W. P.] 
[These results of the kinetic gas theory are confirmed by 
altogether independent lines of physical reasoning with 
which we are not concerned here.] 

We may take, as a rough approximation, that the 
grained structure ( 26) of the most nearly homogeneous 
solid or liquid bodies is of the order of 5 x 10 8 to the 
inch linear. To give a notion of the amount of division 
which this indicates, suppose we magnify a cubic inch of 
such a substance to a cube whose side is the diameter of 
the earth. The earth's polar diameter is 5 x 10 8 inches, 
very approximately. Thus, in the enormously magnified 
cube, there is one particle in every cubic inch or so. We 
say nothing, it is to be noticed, as to the size of the 
particle or granulation itself. [The estimates hitherto 
made of this quantity can hardly be called even rough 
approximations : so widely do they differ from one 
another, according to the particular physical phenomenon 
on which each is based. But probably the particle does 
not occupy so much as 5 per cent, of its share of the 
whole content.] 

All that can be said of the above estimates (of number 
of particles per cubic inch) is that they are, at least 
nearly, of the proper order of magnitude. And it is 
curious to find that the result of Leslie's old " computa- 
tion" ( 104) agrees fairly enough with our present know- 



CHAPTER VI. 

INERTIA, MOBILITY, CENTRIFUGAL FORCE. 

108. We commence with Newton's 

FIRST LAW OF MOTION. 

Every body perseveres in its state, of rest or of uniform 
motion in a straight line, except in so far as it is compelled 
by forces to change that state. 

The property, thus enuntiated as belonging to all 
bodies, is usually called Inertia. And it is clear from the 
statement above that it may be described as passivity, or 
dogged perseverance, but in no sense whatever as 
revolutionary activity. This consideration will be found 
presently to be of great importance. 

Matter is, in Newton's system, regarded as the play- 
thing of force ; submitting to any change of state that 
may be imposed on it, but rigorously persevering in the 
state in which it is left, until force again acts upon it. 

109. The state referred to is one of rest, or of uniform 
motion in a straight line (of which rest is a mere particular 
case). Here we meet with a serious difficulty 

All transiatory motion (including rest, or null motion) 
is, from the very nature of space, essentially relative. 



INERTIA CENTRIFUGAL FORCE. 96 

Eelatively to what, then, are we to say that a body not 
acted on by force moves uniformly in a straight line? 
The answer, so far as we can give it, is 

Relatively to any set of lines drawn in a rigid body, of 
finite dimensions; which is not acted on by force, and which 
has no rotation. 

As will be seen later, ( 131) Newton has pointed out a 
physical test, by which it can be ascertained whether a 
body has rotation or not. 

But questions of this kind can only be alluded to, 
certainly not fully discussed, in an elementary work. 

110. The grand proof of the truth of the first as well as 
of the other Laws of Motion is furnished by the celestial 
motions. So irregular is the motion of the moon, when 
considered carefully, found to be, that no amount of the 
most exact observation alone (i.e. unaided by physical 
investigations) could enable us to predict its place, even 
twenty-four hours beforehand, with anything like the 
accuracy with which it is predicted four years before- 
hand in the Nautical Almanac. So convinced have 
astronomers become of the truth of the laws of motion, 
which are necessarily involved in all their lunar and 
planetary calculations, that when a discrepancy between 
prediction and observation is found to occur no one now 
questions the bases of the calculation. The discrepancy 
is used to correct our previous estimates of the elements 
of the lunar or planetary orbit; or, as in the notable 
case of Uranus, it is employed as an indication of where 
to seek for some undiscovered body whose influence has 
not been taken into account. 

111. Familiar instances of Inertia present themselves 
in all direction^. When a railway carriage is running 
uniformly on a straight piece of road, we become uncon- 



96 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

scious of the motion unless we look out at external 
bodies ; but we detect at once any sudden, or even rapid, 
change of speed. If the motion of the train be checked 
by a sudden application of the brake, their inertia (which 
really maintains their motion) appears to urge the passen- 
gers forwards. A sudden starting of the train produces 
the opposite effect. While the steady motion continues, 
a conjuror can keep a number of balls in the air just as 
easily as if the carriage were at rest. But these things 
need not surprise us. Our rooms are always like perfect 
railway carriages in respect of their absolutely smooth, 
but very rapid, motion round the earth's axis. The 
whole earth itself is flying in its orbit at the rate of a 
million and a half of miles per day ; yet we should have 
known nothing of this motion had our globe been per- 
petually clouded over like that of Jupiter. The whole 
solar system is travelling with great speed among the 
fixed stars, but (at least until the recent introduction of 
spectroscopic methods) we knew of the fact only from 
the minutely accurate observations of astronomers, aided 
by all the resources of the Theory of Probabilities. 

112. When a bullet is dropped from a definite point in 
a uniformly running carriage, it strikes the same point of 
the floor whatever be the speed of the motion ; for, by its 
inertia, it preserves while falling the forward motion of the 
carriage which it obviously had while it was held in the 
hand. But, if the bullet be dropped from the yard of a 
vessel to the deck, it will not fall always on the same spot, 
however uniform be the ship's progress, if there be any 
pitching. For, when the vessel pitches, the yard moves 
forward alternately faster and slower than does the deck. 

Now the top of a tower (unless it be at one of the 
poles) is farther from the earth's axis than is the foot, or 



INERTIA CENTRIFUGAL FORCE. 97 

the ground on which the tower is built ; and, therefore, 
as both complete their revolution in twenty-four hours, 
the top of the tower moves permanently faster than does 
the base. Hence even a truly spherical bullet, dropped 
from the top, does not fall vertically. It deviates to the 
east of the vertical, because it preserves while falling its 
superior eastward speed. In this way we obtain one 
physical proof of the earth's rotation. 

113. The upsetting of buildings by an earthquake 
furnishes a striking instance of inertia. So does the 
almost perfect immunity we experience from the millions 
of meteoric stones which are constantly encountering the 
earth with planetary velocities. This is due to the 
inertia of the air, which, in its turn, is one indispensable 
cause of the destructive action of a tornado ; just as, on 
a smaller scale, a cannon-ball would be harmless without 
inertia, while an earthwork, without inertia, would afford 
no defence against it. But we need give no more in- 
stances the reader will easily supply others from his own 
experience. 

114. So far, we have been speaking of inertia as mani- 
fested by the tendency of a body to persevere in its 
motion with unaltered speed. But we must carefully note 
that this is only one part of Newton's Law. The state 
in which he tells us that bodies persevere by inertia is 
not one of uniform motion merely, but of motion in a 
straight line. The preservation of the rectilinear path 
is quite as essential a part of the functions of inertia as is 
the preservation of the uniform speed. Hence, just as 
(following Newton's system) we attribute any change in 
the speed of a body to the action of force, so, if its line of 
motion be not straight, (whether the speed be unaltered or 
no) its curvature also must be due to the action of force. 

G 



98 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

115. How the force must be applied which causes a 
body, in spite of its inertia, to move in a curve is easily 
understood from some common instances, though it is 
pretty obvious that it must be in a direction perpendicular 
to that of the motion ; and, of course, in the plane in 
which the curvature takes place. For any force in the 
direction of motion must tend only to increase or to 
diminish the speed. 

It is found that, at a curve on a railway line, it is the 
outer of the two rails which is most worn (i.e. that one 
which forms the convex side of the track). And, when 
a sharp curve has to be taken rapidly, the outer rail has 
generally to be laid a little higher than the other. But 
(except when the brake is on) the pressure is mainly 
perpendicular to the rails. Hence the force which causes 
the carriages to move in a curved path must be directed 
inwards to the centre of curvature. 

When we whirl a sling with a stone in it, we feel the 
tension of the cord (which is constantly pulling the stone 
from its natural straight path in towards the hand) 
increased as we cause the sling to rotate faster. 

A bullet, suspended by a string, forms what we call 
a simple pendulum. It can, by proper initial projection, 
be made to revolve uniformly in a horizontal circle. It 
is then what is called a Conical Pendulum. Here the 
tension of the string may be resolved into two parts ; 
one vertical, which supports the weight of the bullet, the 
other horizontal, which continually deflects the bullet 
from its natural rectilinear path. If the string could be 
made long enough, the time of revolution might be made 
twenty-four hours ; and if the pendulum were then set up 
at the north pole, and made to describe its circle in the 
positive direction ( 65), it would appear to remain sus- 



INERTIA CENTRIFUGAL FORCE. 99 

pended at rest in the air, the supporting string not being 
vertical ! If it were made to revolve in the negative 
direction, it would appear to complete a revolution in 
twelve hours. 

The moon is caused to move in an (approximately) 
circular path about the earth by the same attraction 
which causes stones to fall vertically downwards. 

116. One of Newton's remarks on the First Law of 
Motion runs thus : 

"A hoop (or top, Trochus) whose parts by their cohesion 
perpetually draw one another aside from rectilinear motions, 
does not cease to rotate, except in so far as it is retarded 
by the air." 

Thus the uniformity of the earth's rotation about its 
axis, which is the basis of our measurement of time, is 
merely an example of the First Law of Motion. 

But when a fly-wheel, or a grindstone, is made to 
rotate so fast that the cohesion of its parts is no longer 
capable of supplying the forces requisite to keep them 
moving in their circular paths, it bursts (this is the tech- 
nical word), and the fragments fly off in paths which are 
tangential and rectilinear, except in so far as gravity 
modifies them. 

If the rotating body be plastic, as must have been 
the case long ago with the earth as a whole, its form 
will be modified by the tendency of every particle to 
preserve its rectilinear path. Thus it swells out in all 
directions perpendicular to the axis of rotation. Jupiter 
and Saturn, being much larger than the earth, and also 
rotating more rapidly, show this effect in a much greater 
degree. 

A beautiful example is furnished by suspending an 
endless chain by a cord, and (by very rapidly twisting 



100 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

the cord by means of multiplying gear) throwing it into 
rotation. When the rotation of the whole is sufficiently 
rapid it assumes almost exactly the form of a horizontal 
circle, all its links being equidistant from the (vertical) 
axis of rotation. 

117. The old notion, probably suggested by such 
instances as the pull which the stone in a sling seems to 
exert on the hand, was that bodies have a tendency to 
fly outwards from the centre about which they are revolv- 
ing. Hence they were said to exert Centrifugal Force, 
and a Centripetal Force was of course required to balance 
this. The term Centrifugal Force has become rooted 
in our scientific language. It is a convenient enough 
expression, provided we do not split it up, thus taking 
it to imply force, and flying from a centre ; but interpret 
it merely as indicating that, to keep a body moving in 
a curve instead of in its natural straight line, a force 
directed towards the centre of curvature is always 
required. But, as the third law of motion ( 128) tells 
us, a force is only one-half of a stress, so that when force 
is exerted to pull the body inwards from the tangent, an 
equal force must be exerted at the centre tending outwards 
from it. 

We might quite as justly speak of the Onward Force 
of a cannon-ball, which requires a resistance to check it ; 
as of the centrifugal force (understood not as a single 
term but as two words, each with its ordinary meaning) 
which must exist because it requires centripetal force 
to balance it. 

118. Calculating (as in 71) from the earth's mean 
equatorial radius, 3962 miles, and the number of seconds 
in a sidereal day, 86164, we find that the acceleration of 
a point on the equator is about (HI 16 foot per second, 



INERTIA CENTRIFUGAL FOllCE. 161 

per second : while the acceleration due to gravity is 
about 32, in terms of the same units. Thus about -^l-g-th 
of its weight is required merely to keep a body on the 
earth's surface at the equator. By this amount its weight 
(as indicated by a Sjr/ring-balanee, 165) would be 
diminished. 

If the earth had been revolving seventeen times faster 
than it does, this apparent diminution of weight would 
have been 17 2 (or 289) times greater than it is, i.e. bodies 
at the equator would have shown no apparent weight, 
provided they moved along with the same speed as 
the ground below them. 

119. As is pointed out in the preceding extract from 
Newton ( 116), a wheel or other body, rotating about 
an axis and not acted on by forces, perseveres by inertia 
in its uniform rate of rotation. But it does more; it 
preserves (even when acted on by small forces) the direc- 
tion of its axis of rotation, provided at least that it be 
rotating about its axis of greatest or of least moment 
of inertia ( 132). It is for this reason that rifling of 
the bore of a gun has been introduced ; and also that a 
skilled player, when throwing a quoit, gives it rotation 
in its own plane. 

The rotation of the earth about its axis is a more 
complex phenomenon, because it takes place under the 
action of considerable forces which tend to make the 
earth revolve about axes lying in the plane of its equator. 
Yet, because the moments of inertia ( 132) about all 
such axes are approximately equal, the period of the daily 
rotation is not altered, though the direction (in space) of 
the polar axis is affected by Precession and by Nutation. 
We cannot, however, do more than allude to matters of 
this order of difficulty. They are all beautifully illus- 



102 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

trated by means of Gyroscopes, Gyrostats, etc., but the 
full study of the phenomena requires higher mathematics 
than we can introduce here. These are properly questions 
of Abstract Dynamics. 

120. Newton's SECOND LAW OF MOTION is as follows: 
Change of momentum is proportional to force, and takes 

place in the direction in which the force acts. 

Thus, according to JSTewton, a force always produces 
change of momentum. Hence there is no balancing of 
forces, though there may be balancing of the effects of 
forces. 

Every force (however small) produces its proper change 
of momentum. This used to be stated, under the name 
of Mobility, as a characteristic property of matter. 

This change is always gradual, never abrupt. An 
infinite force would be required to produce a finite change 
of momentum abruptly. 

As change of momentum alone is mentioned, it is clear 
that Newton means that the effect of a force is independent 
of the state of motion of the body to which it is applied. 
Hence if a force be uniform, as for instance is practically 
the case with the action of gravity upon a falling body, 
the additional momentum produced by it in each and 
every second will measure its amount. But if it be 
variable, we must measure it by the rate at which 
momentum is produced by it instead of the momentum 
produced by it in one second. Thus the true measure of 
a force is the rate of change of momentum ; or, to use the 
kinematical term, the product of the mass of a body into 
the acceleration of its velocity. 

121. Two special cases, of great importance, must now 
be treated : uniform acceleration in the direction of 
motion, and uniform circular motion. 



INERTIA CENTRIFUGAL FORCE. 103 

it is found that, in vacua, all bodies acquire, per 
second, an additional vertical velocity of about 3 2 '2 feet 
per second. This quantity (which varies with the lati- 
tude, height above sea-level, etc. 165) is usually denoted 
by the letter g. Hence, if M be the mass of a body, its 
weight (i.e. the force which accelerates its fall) is measured 
by the product Mg. 

Kinematics (as we saw in 71) shows us that when a 
point moves uniformly in a circle, the acceleration is 
directed inwards to the centre, and its magnitude is the 
square of the speed multiplied into the curvature of the 
path. Hence to keep a body, of mass M, moving with 
uniform speed V in a circle of radius K, a force whose 
magnitude is MV 2 /E, directed towards the centre of the 
circle, must constantly act upon it. As Mg is the weight 
(W) of the body, we may express this force as 



If to be the Angular Velocity in the circular path, i.e. 
the angle described in unit of time by the radius drawn 
to the moving body, we have obviously 

V-Ra., 

and the expression for the requisite force takes the form 

MR 2 , or W. 

122. Newton shows that, as an immediate consequence 
of the Second Law, we have the Law of Composition of 
Forces acting at one point ; the so-called Parallelogram, 
or Triangle, of Forces. This follows from the facts that 
(a) the changes of velocity produced in the same time, by 
different forces acting on the same body, are proportional 



104 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

to and in the directions of the several forces, and that (b) 
the effect of each force is independent of the simultaneous 
action of the others. Thus the problem is reduced to the 
obvious kinematical composition of velocities ( 69). 

123. We are now prepared to measure both Masses and 
Forces. But, for this purpose, it is necessary to have units 
in terms of whicli to measure. 

The British unit of mass is the Standard Pound, whose 
amount was probably adopted in old times for reasons of 
convenience, but is now fixed by law. 

The French, or Metrical, unit of mass is the Kilo- 
gramme, originally intended to be the mass of a cubic 
decimetre, or litre, of water at its maximum density 
point ; but, practically, defined by a platinum standard. 
The Kilogramme is about 2-20462 Pounds. 

1 24. . The British Unit of Force is such that, when it 
acts for one second on a mass of one pound, it produces 
in it a speed of one foot per second. 

The C. G. S. Unit of Force (or Dyne), which is coming 
into use for scientific measurements, is such that, when it 
acts for one second on a mass of one gramme, it produces 
in it a speed of one centimetre per second. 

The British Unit of Force is about 13,825 Dynes. 
Since the speed acquired by a body falling for one second 
(in vacuo) is ( 120) about 32'2 feet per second, the 
Weight of a Pound is about 445,165 Dynes. 

125. Generally, if a definite force act upon any mass 
for one second, it will generate in it a speed whose magni- 
tude is inversely as the mass. 

Thus the comparison of masses, i.e. their measurement 
in terms of some standard unit, becomes a perfectly definite 
scientific process. 

It may not be easy to carry out, and in fact it is not ; 



INERTIA CENTRIFUGAL FORCE. 105 

at least by any very direct application of the principles 
just explained. That, however, is another matter. No 
one in his senses would question the perfectness of Euclid's 
process for dividing a straight line into a given number of 
equal parts, on the ground that it is practically inappli- 
cable when we try to carry it out. 

What we have sought is an accurate, and an easily 
intelligible, method of comparing masses. If it be not 
easily workable in practice, we must find something more 
workable : just as we now use a screw dividing-engine 
instead of Euclid's unrealisable straight lines, and still 
more unrealisable parallel straight lines. 

126. When we have measured the mass of a body, and 
also its volume ( 92), its average, or mean, density follows 
at once. If the body be homogeneous, this is its actual 
density throughout : and whether it be homogeneous or 
not, its mean density is simply the average amount of 
mass per unit of volume. 

On account, chiefly, of the remarkable result of New- 
ton's ( 34), we postpone all considerations regarding the 
densities of various kinds of matter until we are dealing 
with their specific gravities also. 

127. The process of weighing is, as Newton showed 
( 34), essentially a comparison of masses. So that our 
measurement of mass is practically carried on by means 
of the Balance, which is one of the most delicate and 
accurate instruments of precision yet invented. 

The processes for measuring force are not yet nearly 
so accurate. Numerous instruments have been devised 
for the measurement of special classes of forces, the great 
majority depending upon elasticity of matter. Some of 
the more important of these will be mentioned when we 
require them ; but the reader must be reminded that on 



106 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

Newton's system the true measure of a force is the 
momentum it produces in one second. 

128. The first two laws of motion (applied with suf- 
ficient mathematical resources) enable us to solve any 
problem whatever regarding the motion of a body, treated 
as a mere particle, under the action of any given forces. 
Conversely, they enable us, from the given motion of a 
particle, to find the forces under which the motion has 
taken place. But they do not suffice for the calculation 
of the motion of two or more particles which mutually 
influence one another, whether by gravitation, or cohesion, 
or by any physical mode of attachment. Hence the 
necessity for the 

THIRD LAW OP MOTION. 

To every action there is always an equal and contrary 
reaction; or, the mutual actions of any two bodies are 
always equal and oppositely directed. 

In modern speech Newton's first explanation of the 
sense in which this statement is to be understood may 
be simply expressed thus : 

Every action bettveen two bodies is a Stress. 

In this sense it is very closely connected with the 
first law. For a system of two bodies, considered as one, 
cannot set itself in motion. Even when the masses are 
not connected in any way, the equality of action and 
reaction involves transference of momentum between 
them which leaves the motion of their Centre of Inertia 
unaffected. It was by floating on water a magnet and a 
piece of iron, both attached to the same light board, that 
Newton proved the equality of action and reaction for 
magnetic force. He also proved it by showing that, if 



INERTIA CENTRIFUGAL FORCE. 107 

the gravitation action of one part of the earth on the rest 
were not exactly reciprocated, the earth (as a whole) 
would alter its existing state of motion. 

129. The term centre of inertia, employed above, re- 
quires a few words of explanation. We assume the 
following proposition, which can be established by very 
elementary mathematics. 

In every group of massive particles there is one 
definite point, such that, whatever plane be drawn in 
space, the distance of the point from that plane, multi- 
plied by the sum of the masses, is equal to the sum of 
the separate products formed by multiplying each mass 
into its distance from the plane. It can, therefore, be 
found by executing the requisite calculations for any 
three planes whatever, provided no two of them are 
parallel. This is the centre of inertia of the particles. 

When the particles are severally acted on by forces, 
it follows from Newton's Third Law that the centre of 
inertia of the group moves as if the whole mass were 
there concentrated, and acted on by all the forces simul- 
taneously. This consideration greatly simplifies kinetical 
problems connected with a rigid system or a group of 
particles ; for it enables us to commence by determining 
the motion of the centre of inertia as if it were a mere 
particle, and afterwards to study the motion relatively to 
that centre. 

130. But Newton proceeds to point out that there is a 
second sense in which the terms action and reaction in the 
Third Law may be interpreted, the law itself still remain- 
ing true. In modern phrase it may be expressed as 

The activity of an agent (or the rate at which it does 
Work), is equal to the counter-activity of the resistance. 
Newton's statement of this second mode of interpret- 



>08 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

ing the Third Law has been shown to require compara- 
tively little addition to make it a complete enunciation 
of the Conservation of Energy ( 7). 

131. If two masses be connected by a spiral spring, 
but be otherwise free, and if the spring remains stretched 
to a constant amount, this can only be because the bodies 
are revolving about one another. For, otherwise, the 
stress in the spring would have caused them to approach 
one another. This is Newton's test of the existence of 
Absolute Rotation, 109. For, by the first law, the stress 
which certainly acts on the masses must interfere with 
their states, and by the third law it must do so in opposite 
directions. Each, therefore, must be describing a curved 
path relatively to the other, and this must of course be 
circular. 

Nothing is known, nor is anything conceivable even by 
the most transcendental of metaphysicians, which could 
give us an indication of Absolute Translation. 

132. We conclude the chapter with a few additional 
illustrations and explanations connected with inertia. 

In 119 above we introduced, without explanation, 
the important term Moment of Inertia. This quantity is 
defined, for any body, with reference to any assigned 
axis. It is the sum of the products obtained by multi- 
plying the mass of each small portion of the body into 
the square of its distance from the axis. Its use is two- 
fold. 

(a) If o) be the angular velocity of a rigid body about 
an axis, r the distance of the particle whose mass is ra 
from that axis, the speed of ra is rw, and the kinetic energy 
of rotation (half the product of each part of the mass into 
the square of its speed) is 



INERTIA CENTRIFUGAL FORCE. 109 

half the product of the moment of inertia into the square 
of the angular velocity. 

(ft) Again, the Moment of the momentum of a particle 
about an axis is denned as the product of its momentum by 
the shortest distance between the axis and the line of 
motion of the particle. Hence the moment of momentum 
of m about the axis is mru.r, and the whole moment of 
momentum of the body is 



the product of the moment of inertia into the angular 
velocity. 

133. It is shown in treatises on Dynamics that the 
effect of a pair of equal and opposite forces, whose lines 
of action are different (called by Poinsot a Couple) is to 
produce moment of momentum in proportion to the time 
it acts and to the moment of the couple. Hence, if Q 
be the (constant) moment of the couple, o> the angular 
velocity it produces in time t, when its plane is perpen- 
dicular to the axis above spoken of, 

Io> = 2(wr 2 ) = Q, . . . . (1) 
whence 

Ia, 2 =i2(mr 2 )o, 2 = Q.^ - Qa, . . . (2) 

where a is the angle through which the body has turned. 
For co grows uniformly, and therefore its average value 
during the time t was w 2, so that the whole angle 
described is <at/2. 

But if a (constant) force P act on a particle, of mass M, 
and produce in time t a speed v, we have 

Mi = P; ...... (3) 

The speed increases uniformly, so that its average value 



110 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

is 0/2, and therefore the space described is s vt/ 2. 
Hence, by multiplying both sides by w/2, we get 

Ps ...... (4) 



It is obvious that in the former pair of equations, (1) and 
(2), the quantities I and Q, to and a, play exactly the same 
parts as do M and P, v and s, respectively, in the latter 
pair, (3) and (4). 

This analogy shows, at least in part, the great con- 
venience of the idea of the moment of inertia. 

For special purposes we often write I in the form M& 2 , 
k being then the common distance from the axis at which 
every one of the particles must be placed, so that the 
whole may have the same moment of inertia as before. 
It is called the Radius of Gyration. 

134. As an illustration of the application of the two 
interpretations of the third law, suppose a fly-wheel whose 
axle (horizontal) is carefully mounted on friction rollers, 
to be set in rotation by the descent of a weight attached 
to a string wound round the axle. 

Let to be the angular velocity produced in the fly- 
wheel when a length x of the cord has been unwound, a 
the radius of the axle, M the mass of the appended 
weight, I the moment of inertia of the wheel, and T the 
stress in the cord. 

Then the rate of increase of momentum of the mass 
M is Mo; (with Newton's notation, 72). This must be 
the measure of the force producing it, so that 

Mx = M0-T .... (1.) 

The rate of increase of moment of momentum of the 
fly-wheel is Io>, which must measure the couple produc- 

ing it. Hence 

I=T ..... (2.) 



INERTIA CENTRIFUGAL FORCE. Ill 

But aa> is the amount of cord unwound per second, 
i.e. the rate of descent of the weight. Thus 

ao> = x ..... (3.) 

(1) and (2) are dynamical equations, (3) is kinematical. 
x, <o, and T are to be found from the three. They give 

Ma 2 *? May , 4 . 

Ma 2 + I Ma 2 + rf ' 

where m is the mass of the wheel, and k its radius of 
gyration. ( 133.) 

If the wheel had no moment of inertia this would 
become 

*-*, 

the ordinary equation of acceleration of a free falling 
body. 

Hence, the only effect of the fly-wheel is to diminish 
the effect of gravity on the weight in the proportion 
Ma 2 : Ma 2 + m& 2 . The measure of the stress on the 

cord is 

m_ M.lg M 
~Ma 2 +I = Ma 2 

and it therefore remains the same throughout the motion. 
It increases with increase of the radius of gyration of the 
wheel, but not indefinitely. Its utmost value, as was to 
be expected, is (M<7) the weight of the appended mass. 

135. But the solution of the same problem, by the 
help of Newton's second interpretation of the third law, 
is far more simple. 

The rate at which the agent (the weight of the falling 
body) is doing work is, at any instant, 



The rate at which energy is being gained by the falling 



112 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

body is M.XX. The rate at which energy is gained by the 
fly-wheel is loxo. 
Hence 



or with the help of (3), our kinematical condition, 

M#a a = Ma 2 x+IaJ, . . . . (4.) 

which is the same equation as before. 

136. But, instead of reckoning rates of transference of 
energy, we may still more simply proceed by expressing 
the conservation of the whole amount of energy in the 
system ( 7). 

The falling body has lost WLgx, and has gained 
The fly-wheel has gained JIo> 2 . Hence 



or by (3) 



which is the fluent, or integral, of (4) when the terms of 
that equation are multiplied by x. 

137. If we consider these three solutions of the same 
problem, we see that, while the stress between the 
members of the system plays a prominent part in the 
first, it is altogether unnoticed in the two latter. 

This might, at first sight, tend to induce us to ignore 
stress altogether ; and, undoubtedly, we can do so in all 
cases, except when we study the condition of the intervening 
medium, while energy is stored in any part of it ; or while 
energy is being transferred through it from one part of the 
system to another. The consideration of this view of the 
subject is deferred to our chapters on Elasticity. See, 
especially, 169. 



CHAPTER VII. 

GRAVITATION. 

138. WITHOUT preface we simply give a statement, com- 
pounded from various parts of the Principia (especially 
the Third Book), which comprehends all the essentials of 
Newton's great generalisation. 

Every particle of matter in the universe attracts every 
other particle with a force whose direction is that of the 
line joining the two, and whose magnitude is directly as the 
product of their masses, and inversely as the square of 
their distance from each other. 

Thus, if M, m, are the masses, D their distance, their 
attraction (i.e. the weight of either as due to the other) is 
Mm 
*W 

Here k is called the Coefficient of Gravitation. Its value 
obviously depends on the units employed, and can be 
found in terms of these by means of the apparatus for 
the mean density of the earth, whose determination is one 
of the objects of the present chapter. 

This statement is made in terms of attraction : i.e. 
force : a form convenient for our present purpose. 

But it will be shown later ( 159) that all we know on 
the subject can be expressed (and still more simply) in a 
form which ignores even the very name of force. 

It divides itself, for proof, into a number of separate 
heads ; as follows : 

(a) The Universality of Gravitation. 

H 



114 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

(5) The direction of the force between two particles. 

(c) The proportionality of the force to the product of 
the masses. 

(d) The law of the inverse square of the distance. 
Besides these more immediate assertions the statement 

also raises the questions 

(e) What do we mean by " attraction " ? 
(/) What is the cause of gravitation ? 

And other matters of great importance naturally present 
themselves, such as, " What is the mass of the Earth," etc. 1 

These questions must be kept before us, so that we may 
give to each of them (so far as our knowledge yet extends, 
and so far as is consistent with the scope of this work) a 
sufficient answer. (/) is still an open question, for the 
attempts at answering it have not been very successful, (a) 
of course can only be answered either in an approximate or in 
an indirect manner, because we cannot (by our most delicate 
instruments) even prove the existence of gravitation- attrac- 
tion between two particles of matter. Here, however, we 
tread (as will be seen) on comparatively safe ground. 

And the same may be said for (b), (c), and (d), because 
the reasoning and experiment which sufficiently answer 
(a) will be found here even more complete, (e) will be 
discussed along with (/). 

139. (a) One strong argument for the universality of 
gravitation is that the weight of a body is the sum of the 
weights of its parts. This is, of course, a matter which 
can be tested to a very great degree of accuracy by means 
of the balance. Thus each particle of the body contributes 
its share to the weight of the whole. 

And the weight of a given quantity of matter does not 
depend upon its form. A mass of gold retains exactly 
the same weight when it is beaten out into the finest leaf, 



GRAVITATION. 115 

or dissolved in any quantity, however great, of an acid. 
Thus terrestrial gravity acts as freely upon the particles 
when they are surrounded on all sides by the solid mass, as 
when they are directly exposed by the beating, or solution. 

In fact, it is quite easy to see that, were this not the 
case, were it, in fact, possible to find a screen through 
which gravity could not act, i.e. were it possible to inter- 
fere with the universality of gravitation, we should also 
be able to produce The Perpetual Motion : an inexhaust- 
ible source of new energy. This we know ( 7) cannot be. 

To show, however, that the above hypothesis would 
lead to this result, we have only to think of a fly-wheel, 
one part of which shall be screened from the earth's 
attraction, the rest unscreened. Every part loses weight 
as soon as it enters the shadow, as it were, of the screen, 
and gains it again when it emerges. Thus the wheel, 
being constantly heavy on one side and weightless on the 
other, constantly gains energy from nothing. 

The wheel would become as it were a tread-mill : 
working of itself, instead of by the hard labour of a gang 
of convicts climbing, without mounting, up one side. 

140. (a) continued. Newton attacked the question by 
assuming the law of gravitation for the separate particles 
of a body, and thence finding what should be the law of 
attraction towards the body as a whole. He thus arrived 
at two exceedingly simple and beautiful theorems. The 
first is as follows : 

A spherical shell of uniform gravitating matter exerts no 
attraction on a particle within it. 

[For the proof of this, and of the succeeding proposition, 
we assume the following results of pure mathematics : 

The area of a transverse section of a cone of small angle 
is proportional to the square of its distance from the vertex. 



116 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

The measure of the spherical opening of such a cone is 
the area it cuts off from the unit sphere whose centre is 
its vertex ; which is the same as the area of the transverse 
section at unit distance from the vertex. 

An oblique section has greater area than the transverse 
section, at the same distance from the vertex, in propor- 
tion to the secant of their inclination to one another.] 

Take any point B, within the spherical shell, and let it 
be the vertex of a double cone of exceedingly small angle. 
This cuts out two minute areas on the spherical surface, 
obviously at equal inclinations to 
the axis of the cone. Hence their 
areas, and therefore their masses, 
are as the squares of BP, BQ. 
But their attractions on B are 
inversely as the squares of BP, 
BQ. Thus these attractions balance 
one another. And the whole shell 
may thus be divided into pairs of 
parts, whose attractions exactly 

balance one another on B. Hence the proposition, which 
is obviously true of any uniform shell, however thick, if 
only bounded by concentric spheres. And it is true, if 
the shell be made up of concentric layers of different 
densities, provided the density of each layer be uniform. 

No other law than that of the inverse square of the 
distance is capable of giving this result. 

141. The second of Newton's theorems is : 
A spherical sJiell of uniform gravitating matter attracts 
an external particle as if its whole mass were condensed at 
its centre. 

Let A be the external particle, C the centre of the 
shell. Cut off CB, a third proportional to CA, CD ; and 




GRAVITATION. 117 

divide the shell by small double cones whose vertices 
are at B. Let PBQ be such a cone. Then if w be its 
spherical opening, the areas of the sections at P and Q are 

BP 2 ft> sec CPB, BQ2o, sec CPB, 
and their attractions on unit mass at A are 

BI"...eeCPB ft and Eg., sec CPB ft 

Ax AQ 

where p is the surface-density, i.e. the mass per unit area. 




FIG. 12. 

But the geometry of the figure shows us at once that 
<CPB= < PAD= < QAD, and BP : AP : : CP : AC : : 
BQ : AQ. Hence the elements at P and Q attract A 
equally, and the resultant of their attractions is therefore 
along AC. Its value is 

2CP 2 .c0p 
AC 2 

in which the multiplier of <o is constant ; i.e. each portion 
of the shell produces a share, of the whole attraction 
along AC, proportional to the angular opening it subtends 
at B. 

The sum of all possible values of w is the area of the 



118 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

surface of the unit hemisphere, i.e. '2ir. Hence the whole 
attraction is 

47rCP 2 p 

AC 2 

Now 47rCP 2 is the surface-area of the shell, so that the 
above expression is merely 

Mass of shell 

Square of distance from centre ' 

and the proposition is proved. 

It can at once be extended, as the former was, to a mass 
made up of concentric shells of different densities, pro- 
vided each have the same density throughout. 

No other law of force, except the law of the direct 
distance, gives this result. 

142. Hence a uniform spherical shell, or a mass made 
up of uniform concentric shells, has a true Centre of 
Gravity, so far as bodies external to it are concerned ; 
for it attracts, and therefore is attracted by, all external 
bodies, as if it were condensed in its centre. 

It is only a very special class of bodies (though of 
course its members are infinite in number) which have a 
true centre of gravity in the sense just explained. When 
such a point exists, it always coincides with the centre of 
inertia, as we see at once by supposing the attracting 
body to be so distant that its action on different parts of 
the attracted body is in parallel lines, and proportional 
simply to the relative masses : and, for many purposes, 
it is sufficiently accurate to assume that the centre of 
inertia of a body may be treated as a centre of gravity. 

But we must beware of making too free a use of this 
hypothesis. If, for instance, the earth had a true centre 
of gravity, and were rotating about its axis of greatest 
moment of inertia (through that point), there could be 
neither Precession nor Nutation. 



GRAVITATION. 119 

143. (a) continued. Armed with these results, Newton 
was justified in dealing with masses approximately 
spherical, such as those of the sun and planets, as if each 
had been a mere particle, condensed at its centre. And 
here he had the benefit of the altogether extraordinary 
labours of Kepler ; who, by sheer guessing, often of the 
wildest kind but followed up by persevering calculation, 
had reduced to a few simple statements the chief kine- 
matical results deducible from the observations of Tycho 
Brahe. These were given in Kepler's work, De Motibus 
StellcB Martis, Prague, 1609, and are now universally 



Kepler's Laws. 

I. Each planet describes an Ellipse (with comets this 
may be any Conic Section) of which the Sun's centre 
occupies one focus. 

II. The radius-vector of each planet describes equal 
areas in equal times. 

III. The square of the periodic time (in an elliptic 
orbit) is proportional to the cube of the major axis. 

144. (b) Newton showed that, as an immediate conse- 
quence of Kepler's Law II. above, the direction of the 
attraction of the sun for a planet must be that of the line 
joining their centres. 

In fact, double the area described by the radius-vector 
of a planet in one second is the moment of its velocity 
about the sun's centre. But the moment of the resultant 
of two velocities is the sum of their separate moments. 
Hence, as the moment of the planet's velocity remains the 
same, the moment of each successive increment which it 
receives must be nil, i.e. these increments (i.e. the 
accelerations) must be directed towards the sun's centre. 



120 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

We may prove this part also of the law of gravitation 
by showing that, were it not true, The Perpetual Motion 
would be attainable. But the reader may easily make out 
this proof for himself. 

145. (c) That the attraction varies directly as the 
product of the masses will be proved at once if it be 
shown to be proportional to one of the masses while the 
other remains constant. For it must be remembered 
that, by the third law of motion (see 128), gravitation- 
attraction is mutual ; each of the two attracting bodies has 
as much of a share in producing it as has the other. It is 
clear, then, that the proof of this part of the law will be 
obtained at once if we can show that the weights of bodies 
are, in any and every one locality, proportional to their 
masses ( 34). 

We have seen that the measure of a force is the 
momentum it produces in one second. Submit a number 
of bodies to the action of their own weights alone, each 
will acquire in one second a momentum proportional to 
its weight. But if the weight be proportional to the 
mass, the momentum must also be proportional to the 
mass, and thus the speed acquired must be the same for 
all. That is, if they be under the action, each of its own 
weight alone, they will fall side by side through any space 
whatever. Now this is known to be very nearly the case 
when we let stones or bullets, or even lumps of wood, 
fall ; while it is obviously not so with feathers, paper, or 
gold leaf. But these exceptions show at once why the 
trial is not a fair one. The falling bodies are all resisted 
by the air, some only slightly, others with forces not much 
less than their whole weights. Hence, to make the 
experiment as nearly as possible free from such interfering 
causes, Newton made the fall extremely slow, but in such 



GRAVITATION. 121 

a way that it could be repeated over and over again under 
precisely similar circumstances, and therefore its period 
could be measured very exactly. He used, as the bob of 
a simple pendulum, a light hollow shell which could be 
filled successively with different kinds of matter. 

In Book II. sec. vi. prop. xxiv. of the Principia, he 
proves that the mass of the bob of a simple pendulum of 
given length is directly as its weight and as the square of 
its time of oscillation in vacuo. And, in the 7th Corollary 
to this proposition, we read : 

" Hence appears a method both of comparing bodies one 
among another, as to the quantity of matter in each, anc 
of comparing the weights of the same body in different 
places, to know the variation of its gravity. And, by 
experiments made with the greatest accuracy, I have 
always found the quantity of matter in bodies to be 
proportional to their weight." 

Thus gravity depends on the quantity, but in no way 
on the quality, of the matter in a body ; and it is in all 
cases attractive. In these respects it stands in marked 
contrast to magnetic forces. 

146. (d) An immediate deduction, from the first two 
of Kepler's Laws, is that the Hodograph ( 70) of a 
planet's orbit is a circle. For (see Fig. 13) the moment 
of the velocity, V, of P, about the sun, S, is constant 
( 144). And by Kepler's Law I., the orbit ABA' is an 
ellipse of which S is one focus. Let fall the perpendicular 
SQ on the tangent at P, then Q lies on the circle whose 
diameter is the major axis AA' of the orbit. Thus V.SQ 
is constant. But if QS cut the circle again in R, SR.SQ 
is constant. Thus SR is proportional to V. Hence SR 
is drawn from a fixed point S, in a direction perpendicular 
to that of the motion of P, and its length is proportional 



122 



PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 



to the speed of P. The locus of R, the auxiliary circle, 
is therefore a curve similar to the hodograph, but turned 
through a right angle. 

The tangent at R, which is the direction of the accelera- 
tion of the velocity SR, is therefore perpendicular to SP. 
[In fact CR is parallel to SP, by a property of the ellipse.] 
The magnitude of the acceleration of P is proportional to 
the speed of R, i.e. proportional to the angular velocity of 
CR ; i.e. to the angular velocity of SP. But the moment 
of P's velocity, about S, which is constant, can also be 
expressed as the product of SP 2 into the angular velocity 




- R 



FIG. 13. 

of SP. Hence the angular velocity of SP, and therefore 
also the acceleration of P, must be inversely proportional 
to SP 2 . Thus we have the law of change of attraction 
with distance. 

147. The detailed investigation is easily given : thus, 



GKAVITATION. 123 

if SP = r, <A'SP = 0, and if h be twice the area 
described by SP in unit of time, 

r*6 = h. 

But SQ.V-A, 

while SQ.SR=AS.SA' = BC 2 , 

where BC is the semi-axis minor of the ellipse. 
Thus SR-^-V. 

But, on the same scale, the acceleration of P is measured 
by the velocity of R, which is CR.0, or CA.0. 
Hence the actual acceleration of P is 

h PA ,,_ fr 2 .CA 3 1 
"BC 2 - BC^CA'r 3 " 

Now twice the area of the ellipse is 27rBC.CA ; and, if 
T be the periodic time, it must also be h. T. Hence 



Acceleration of P = ' JL 

Kepler's Third Law tells us that CA 3 /T 2 is the same 
for all the planets. Hence we conclude that it is the 
same gravitation, diminishing as the square of the distance 
increases, which acts on each one of the planets. 

148. The result of 146 might at once have been 
obtained from Kepler's third law. For if we suppose the 
orbits of the planets to be circles (which they are approxi- 
mately), that law gives 

T 2 <x R 3 , 

where T is the periodic time, R the radius of the circle. 
But, if V be the planet's speed in its circular orbit, we 
have the kinematical result 

2 <x R 2 . 



124 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

From the two we obtain 



z'.e. (see 121) the accelerations are inversely as the 
squares of the distances. 

But it is better to derive, as Newton did, the law of 
inverse square from the two first of Kepler's laws ; and 
then the third gives us the further information that every 
planet behaves exactly as any other would do if substituted 
for it, i.e. that the sun's gravity pays no attention to the 
quality of matter. 

149. Having found that, in these general matters at 
least, the assumed law of gravitation is in agreement with 
the planetary motions, Newton turned to particulars, and 
the special one which he took as a test was the moon's 
revolution about the earth. He says : 

" That the circum terrestrial force likewise decreases in 
the duplicate proportion of the distances, I infer thus. 

" Let us then assume the mean distance. of the moon 
60 semi-diameters of the earth, and its periodic time in 
respect of the fixed stars 27 d 7 h 43 m as astronomers have 
determined it. And a body revolved in our air, near the 
surface of the earth supposed at rest, by means of a 
centripetal force which should be to the same force at the 
distance of the moon in the reciprocal duplicate propor- 
tion of the distances from the centre of the earth, that is, 
as 3600 : 1, would (secluding the resistance of the air) 
complete a revolution in l h 24 m 27 s . 

" Suppose the circumference of the earth to be 
123,249,600 Paris feet, as has been determined by the 
late mensuration of the French, then the same body, 
deprived of its circular motion, and falling freely by the 



GRAVITATION. 125 

impulse of the same centripetal force as before, would, in 
one second of time, describe 15^- Paris feet. 

" This agrees with what we observe in all bodies about 
the earth. For by the experiments of pendulums, and a 
computation raised thereon, Mr Huygens has demonstrated 
that bodies falling by all that centripetal force with which 
(of whatever nature it is) they are impelled near the 
surface of the earth, do, in one second of time, describe 
15_^. Paris feet." 

The comparatively accurate measurement, of the length 
of a degree of latitude on the earth, by Picard was un- 
doubtedly the cause which ultimately led to the publica- 
tion of the Principles, of which the fundamental proposi- 
tions had been obtained nearly twenty years before. 
For Newton, using the rough estimate of 60 miles to 
a degree, had found that the moon's deflection by gravity, 
in one second, from a rectilinear path, was not -g-gVffth of 
the space through which a stone falls in one second at 
the surface of the earth, and had in consequence put his 
investigations aside, until he was led to resume them by 
hearing the result of Picard's measures. 

150. Having thus established the law of gravitation by 
calculations founded mainly on Kepler's laws, Newton 
proceeded to show that these laws could not themselves 
be accurate. For a single spherical planet, revolving 
about a spherical sun, the first two laws would still be 
true, but a second planet would at once interfere with 
this state of matters : the orbits would no longer be 
ellipses, and equal areas would no longer be described 
in equal times. Again, the third law could never be 
exactly true, even if the planets did not attract one 
another, unless they contained each the same fraction of 
the sun's mass. But the consideration of questions like 



126 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

these belongs to Physical Astronomy, with which we have 
nothing to do here. Suffice it to say that Newton's own 
magnificently- extended deductions, supplemented as they 
have been by those of successive generations of illustrious 
mathematicians, have verified already to a very high 
degree of nicety the competence of the law of gravitation 
to account for the excessively complex motions and 
perturbations observed in the solar system. 

151. We have already ( 118) adverted to the apparent 
loss of weight by bodies at the equator. This loss, due 
(in part, at least, for there is another part ( 165) due to 
the figure of the earth) to the so-called Centrifugal Force, 
is, of course, directly proportional to the mass of each 
body. But experiment with the most delicate balances 
has shown that bodies of any kind which equilibrate 
in one latitude equilibrate in all. Hence their weights 
remain equal when, from that of each, is subtracted an 
amount proportional to the mass. This can only be if 
the weights are themselves proportional to the masses. 
Thus we have an independent experimental proof of the 
truth of clause (c) of Newton's statement. 

152. We can scarcely yet be said to have proof that 
gravitation exists, as we know it, in stellar systems. For 
the data, from which to calculate orbits of double stars, 
have to be obtained under circumstances which do not 
admit of more than rude attempts at approximation. We 
know that there are hundreds of systems in which two or 
more stars revolve about one another in a way which 
leaves no doubt that they are physically connected. But 
the observations which have as yet been made have been 
applied, not to prove that the relative orbits are consistent 
with Kepler's laws but, to find the approximate dimen- 
sions of the orbits, and thence the amounts of matter in 



GRAVITATION. 127 

the mutually influencing bodies, on the supposition that 
Kepler's laws hold even in these remote systems. 

Thus we cannot, at least for the present, look for proof 
of the universality of gravitation in this direction. But 
we have ample direct proofs that parts of the earth, and 
not merely the earth as a whole, exert gravitating force. 
Some of these will be considered in the immediately 
succeeding sections. 

153. The most direct of these (albeit not the earliest) 
is what (though devised by Michell) goes by the name of 

The Cavendish Experiment. 

In this, by means of the elasticity of a wire or fibre, the 
attraction between two spheres of manageable size is not 
only demonstrated, but measured. The following sketch 
shows a horizontal section through the main parts of the 
arrangement. 

Two small balls, A and B, an inch or two in diameter, 
are connected by a stiff, but very light, horizontal girder 
or tube, which is suspended at its middle point (E) by a 
long fine wire. The whole of this part of the apparatus 
is enclosed in a case, carefully coated with tinfoil or gold- 
leaf, to prevent (as far as possible) irregular heating and 
consequent currents of air ; perhaps, also, slight electrifi- 
cation. To the girder is attached a small mirror, whose 
plane is vertical. A little glazed window in the case 
allows any motion of the mirror to be measured by the 
consequent deviations of a ray of light reflected by it. 

Outside the case are placed two equal, but much more 
massive, spheres, usually balls of lead a foot or more in 
diameter, so mounted that they can be made to move 
(without jerk of any kind) from the positions C p D v to 



128 



PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 



the positions C 2 , D 2 , and C 3 , D 3 , or back again, at will. 
[In Cornu's recently-constructed apparatus there are four 
spherical iron vessels, of equal size, placed once for all at 








FIG. 14. 



C 15 C 3 , Dj, D 3 , and so connected, two and two, that Cj 
or D 3 , and simultaneously D x or C 3 , may be filled with 
mercury, the other of each pair being left empty. All 
four can be left empty when required.] 



GRAVITATION. 129 

Cavendish, and all who have since made the experi- 
ment, found that the apparatus was never at rest. In 
order to determine the equilibrium position it was 
necessary, therefore, in all cases to measure the limits of 
successive oscillations, and to compare the mean of two 
successive deflections to one side, with the intervening 
deflection to the other side. The time of each oscillation 
was also carefully measured. 

When the large masses were placed at Cg, Dg, in a line 
perpendicular to the girder (i.e. each half-way between 
its extreme positions), the oscillations were due practically 
to torsion alone, and the couple required to twist the 
suspending filament through a given angle could be 
determined from the period of free oscillation, taken 
along with the length of the girder and the masses of 
the two small balls. 

When the masses were placed at C 15 D 15 within a 
couple of inches of the small balls, the range of the 
oscillation was completely altered. From the observa- 
tions (made as before) the new position of equilibrium 
could be calculated. A fresh set of observations was 
then made with the balls at C 2 , D 2 , and then they were 
shifted to C 3 , D 3 . Thus is determined the deflection 
ivhich would have been produced if the sensitive part of 
the apparatus could have been reduced to rest. 

But from this deflection, and the ascertained coefficient 
of torsion of the wire, the force acting on each of the 
small balls can be calculated. This is to be compared 
with the weight of one of the small balls, and then the 
question is, " What must be the mass of the earth when 
it attracts a mass at its surface (i.e. 4000 miles from its 
centre) with a force greater in a known ratio than that 
with which the same mass is attracted by a given 

I 



130 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

spherical mass of lead, whose centre is placed at a given 
distance ? " The law of gravitation at once enables us to 
write the requisite condition. The mass of the earth, 
thus found, has only to be divided by its volume ( 126) 
to give the mean density. 

The quantities compared in such a case, i.e. the attrac- 
tions, may be taken as approximately in proportion to 
the radius and the mean density of the earth, and of the 
leaden sphere, respectively. They are, therefore (as the 
density of lead is double that of the earth), in the ratio 
4000 x 5280 : 2 ; or 10 7 : 1 roughly : taking 1 foot as the 
radius of the leaden sphere. Hence, to estimate correctly, 
to two significant figures only, the earth's mean density, 
we require to measure a force of the order of the hundred- 
millionth part of the weight of the small ball. This 
rough calculation gives some idea of the delicacy of the 
experiment. 

154. The details of the necessary precautions, as well 
as of the results of various repetitions of this experiment, 
do not suit a work like this, and must be sought in the 
original descriptions. 1 

Cavendish's result for the mean density of the earth was 
5 '48 (the density of water being taken as unit); Reich 
obtained 5'49 ; Baily 5'67, since reduced (by the recal- 
culations of Cornu) to 5*55. Cornu's own result is 5 '50. 

It is very remarkable that Newton, in Book III. of 
the Principia, prop, x., made the following guess : 

" Since the common matter of our earth, on the surface 
thereof, is about twice as heavy as water, and a little 
lower, in mines, is found about three, four, or even fi ve 

1 Cavendish, Phil. Trans., 1798. Baily, Mem. Ast. Soc., 1843. 
Reich, Abhand. d. K. Sachs, Ges., 1852, Cornu, Comptes Rendus, 
1870-78, 



GRAVITATION. 131 

times more heavy, it is probable that the quantity of the 
whole matter of the earth may be five or six times greater 
than if it consisted all of water." 

Every one of the experimental results, above given, 
lies almost exactly half-way between the limits thus 
assigned, and published, more than a century before even 
the earliest attempt at direct determination was made. 

155. Good results have been obtained by a modifica- 
tion of this experiment, which enables the experimenter 
to employ an ordinary balance ; an attracting sphere of 
considerable mass being applied beneath a sphere attached 
to one arm of the balance, and already counterpoised 
(at a different level) by weights in a scale-pan. Thus the 
uncertainties of torsion are avoided. Of late, however; 
fibres of quartz have been drawn, which are found to be 
singularly certain in their working, so that the original form 
of the Cavendish apparatus has been reverted to by several 
experimenters, with its scale very considerably reduced. 1 

156. Other methods, which have been employed for 
the determination of the mean density of the earth, 
depend upon the comparison of the attraction exercised 
by a mountain, or by some other part of the earth, with 
that of the whole earth, when these act simultaneously, 
but in different directions, on the same body. The earliest 
recorded trial of this method was made by De la Conda- 
mine and others, among the Andes. It was first carefully 
worked out by Maskelyne on a prominent Perthshire 
mountain, and has consequently been called 

The Schehallien Experiment. 

By geodetic measures, altogether uninfluenced by 
gravitation, the actual distance between two stations, 

1 Boys, Nature, xxxix., 65, 1889. 



132 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

one north the other south of the mountain, can be found, 
and from it can be calculated the difference of their 
(geographical) latitudes. But the true latitude of each 
station separately can be determined by the usual astro- 
nomical methods, depending on the observed meridian 
altitude of a star. The difference between the geographi- 
cal and the true latitude of each station depends upon 
the attraction of the mountain for the plumb-line, or 
the trough of mercury, which is used to determine the 
vertical. The station south of the mountain (in the 
northern hemisphere) has its latitude made less than 
the geographical, that to the north made greater by this 
action. Hence, if everything were symmetrical on the 
two sides of the mountain, the difference of the astro- 
nomically determined true latitudes at the two stations 
would be greater than that of their geographical latitudes 
by double the deviation produced in the plumb-line by 
the mountain. 

The mountain must now be contoured ; then studied 
by a geologist, so as to enable him to decide on the most 
probable distribution of matter in it; then the specific 
gravities of samples of these kinds of matter must be 
determined. Next a laborious process of Quadrature 
must be gone through to calculate the action on the 
plummet, taking account of the form and density of the 
mass. Finally, the deflection of the plumb-line is de- 
rived from this result, in terms of the (unknown) mean 
density of the earth, and compared with the measured 
deflection. 

Maskelyne's 1 observations, developed successively by 
Hutton 2 and by Playfair, 3 gave as result for the earth's 
mean density 4*48 and 4'86. The great objection to this 
i Phil. Trans., 1775. 2 Ibid., 1778. 3 Ibid., 1811. 



GRAVITATION. 133 

method is the uncertainty under which we must remain 
as to the internal structure, not only of the mountain 
itself but of the whole crust of the earth in its neighbour- 
hood. This cannot be got over completely, so that the 
result is liable to considerable error. 

157. The Harton Experiment was made by Airy in the 
Harton pits. It consists in comparing the intensity of 
gravity at the earth's surface with that at the bottom of 
a mine : the same pendulum being used successively at 
the two stations; or, still better, two pendulums being 
made to vibrate simultaneously, one at each station, but 
now and again interchanged. This method, with the 
help of modern electrical processes for comparing the 
behaviour of the pendulums, is probably (so far as exact- 
ness of measurement is concerned) a really good one, 
The intensity of gravity at the bottom of the mine differs 
from that at the surface on two accounts. Suppose a 
surface drawn inside the earth, but everywhere at a depth 
equal to that of the mine ; so as to divide the earth into a 
core and a uniformly thick skin, as it were, enclosing it. 
Gravity at the top of the pit depends on the combined 
attractions of these parts. At the bottom of the pit the 
skin (being, at least very approximately, spherical) ceases to 
attract (by Newton's proposition, 140), but we have come 
nearer to the core. Hence the observations enable us to com- 
pare the attraction of the core with that of the skin. Now 
we know the volume of the skin, but it has to be assumed 
(and this is the fatal defect of the method) that the skin is 
everyivhere of the mean density determined from examina- 
tion of the various strata passed through in sinking the pit. 

It is not, therefore, surprising that the result of this 
experiment, 1 viz. 6*56, should differ very materially from 
1 Phil. Trans., 1856. 



184 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

the consistent results obtained by the various workers at 
the Cavendish experiment. 

158. It was suggested byRobison 1 that the alternate 
filling and emptying of an estuary or bay, at different 
states of the tide, might supply an excellent mode of 
measuring the earth's mean density by means of observa- 
tions of the consequent twelve-hourly periodic changes of 
latitude. The contouring required would be very easy, 
in fact the two chief contours required are given at once 
by the sea-margins at high and low water ; the density of 
sea-water is practically uniform, and there are places 
where the whole rise of the tide sometimes amounts to 
1 20 feet or so. But this promising method seems not to 
have got beyond the stage of suggestion. Still, it is the 
only one yet proposed, besides the Cavendish method and 
its mere modifications, which has not some inherent and 
fatal weakness. 

159. (e) and (/) of 138 above. That two pieces of 
matter behave as if they attracted one another according 
to Newton's law, is certain. But it by no means follows 
that they do so attract. All that we are entitled to say, 
from the facts given above, is as follows : 

The part of the energy of a system of two particles of 
matter, of masses m and m', which depends upon their 
distance, r, from one another, is less than if they were in- 
finitely far apart by 



and this is not altered by the presence of other particles. 

This, taken along with the conservation of energy, 
enables us fully to investigate the motions of any system 

1 Elements of Mechanical Philosophy, 1804, p. 339. See also 
Forbes, Proc. R.S.E., II. p. 244. 



GRAVITATION. 135 

of gravitating masses. It represents, in fact, our whole 
knowledge on the subject. And it is important to 
observe that the statement is altogether free from even 
the mention of the word attraction or force. [See, again, 
15, 137.] 

160. We may, however, briefly notice some hypotheses 
which have been framed as to the mechanism on which 
gravitation depends. For Newton, in his celebrated 
Letters to Bentley, expressly says : 

"You sometimes speak of gravity as essential and 
inherent to matter. Pray do not ascribe that notion to 
me ; for the cause of gravity is what I do not pretend to 
know, and therefore would take more time to consider of 
it." 

" It is inconceivable that inanimate brute matter should, 
without the mediation of something else which is not 
material, operate on and affect other matter without 
mutual contact, as it must do if gravitation in the sense 
of Epicurus be essential and inherent in it. ... That 
gravity should be innate, inherent, and essential to matter, 
so that one body may act upon another at a distance 
through a vacuum^ without the mediation of anything 
else, by and through which their action and force may be 
conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an 
absurdity, that I believe no man who has in philosophical 
matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into 
it. Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly 
according to certain laws; but whether this agent be 
material or immaterial, I have left to the consideration of 
my readers." 

161. When we come to deal with molecular forces we 
shall find that small bodies, such as sticks, straws, air- 
bubbles, etc., floating on water, are made to aggregate 



136 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

themselves into groups by molecular tension in the water- 
surface ( 288). Hence the idea that stress, in a medium 
filling all space, might account for the apparent mutual 
attraction between bodies entirely surrounded by this 
medium. 

Newton, in the Queries at the end of his Optics, speaks 
of a possible explanation to be obtained by assuming that 
dense bodies rarefy the ether surrounding them, to an 
amount which is less as the distance is greater. 

Clerk-Maxwell says on this point : l 

" To account for such a force by means of stress in an 
intervening medium, on the plan adopted for electric and 
magnetic forces, ... we must suppose that there is a 
pressure in the direction of the lines of force, combined 
with a tension in all directions at right angles to the lines 
of force. Such a stress would, no doubt, account for the 
observed effects of gravitation. We have not, however, 
been able hitherto to imagine any physical cause for such 
a state of stress. It is easy to calculate the amount of 
this stress which would be required to account for the 
actual effects of gravity at the surface of the earth. It 
would require a pressure of 37,000 tons' weight on the 
square inch in a vertical direction, combined with a 
tension of the same numerical value in all horizontal 
directions. The state of stress, therefore, which we must 
suppose to exist in the invisible medium is 3000 times 
greater than that which the strongest steel could support.'' 

162. Other attempts have been made, with the view 
of showing that waves, or pulsating motion, in a medium, 
would have the effect of drawing immersed bodies 
together. Again, Lord Kelvin has shown that if space 
be filled with an incompressible fluid, which comes into 
1 Eney. Brit., ninth ed., Art. "Attraction." 



GRAVITATION. 137 

existence in fresh quantities at the surface of every 
particle of matter, at a rate proportional to its mass, and 
is swallowed up at an infinite distance, or, if each 
particle of matter constantly swallows up an amount 
proportional to its mass, a constant supply being kept 
up from an infinite distance, in either case gravitation 
would be accounted for. This is, however, virtually 
a suggestion of a dynamical mode of producing the 
diminution of pressure required in Newton's attempt at 
explanation. 

163. An attempt at explanation, from a totally different 
point of view, was made by Le Sage in 1818. The fol- 
lowing account of it is taken from Clerk-Maxwell's article, 
" Atom," already referred to : 

"The theory of Le Sage is that the gravitation of 
bodies towards each other is caused by the impact of 
streams of atoms flying in all directions through space. 
These atoms he calls ultramundane corpuscules, because 
he conceives them to come in all directions from regions 
far beyond that part of the system of the world which 
is in any way known to us. He supposes each of them 
to be so small that a collision with another ultramundane 
corpuscule is an event of very rare occurrence. It is by 
striking against the molecules of gross matter that they 
discharge their function of drawing bodies towards each 
other. A body placed by itself in free space and exposed 
to the impacts of these corpuscules would be bandied about 
by them in all directions, but because, on the whole, it 
receives as many blows on one side as on another, it cannot 
thereby acquire any sensible velocity. But if there are 
two bodies in space, each of them will screen the other 
from a certain proportion of the corpuscular bombard- 
ment, so that a smaller number of corpuscules will strike 



138 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

either body on that side which is next the other body, 
while the number of corpuscules which strike it in other 
directions remains the same. 

" Each body will therefore be urged towards the other 
by the effect of the excess of the impacts it receives on 
the side farthest from the other. If we take account of 
the impacts of those corpuscules only which come directly 
from infinite space, and leave out of consideration those 
which have already struck mundane bodies, it is easy to 
calculate the result on the two bodies, supposing their 
dimensions small compared with the distance between 
them. 

"The force of attraction would vary directly as the 
product of the areas of the sections of the bodies taken 
normal to the distance and inversely as the square of the 
distance between them. 

" Now, the attraction of gravitation varies as the pro- 
duct of the masses of the bodies between which it acts, 
and inversely as the square of the distance between them. 
If, then, we can imagine a constitution of bodies such 
that the effective areas of the bodies are proportional to 
their masses, we shall make the two laws coincide. Here, 
then, seems to be a path leading towards an. explanation 
of the law of gravitation, which, if it can be shown to be 
in other respects consistent with facts, may turn out to be 
a royal road into the very arcana of science. 

"Le Sage himself shows that, in order to make the 
effective area of a body, in virtue of which it acts as a 
screen to the streams of ultramundane corpuscules, propor- 
tional to the mass of the body, whether the body be large 
or small, we must admit that the size of the solid atoms 
of the body is exceedingly small compared with the 
distances between them, so that a very small proportion 



GRAVITATION. 139 

of the corpuscules are stopped even by the densest and 
largest bodies. We may picture to ourselves the streams 
of corpuscules coming in every direction, like light from a 
uniformly illuminated sky. We may imagine a material 
body to consist of a congeries of atoms at considerable 
distances from each other, and we may represent this by 
a swarm of insects flying in the air. To an observer at a 
distance this swarm will be visible as a slight darkening 
of the sky in a certain quarter. This darkening will 
represent the action of the material body in stopping the 
flight of the corpuscules. Now, if the proportion of light 
stopped by the swarm is very small, two such swarms will 
stop nearly the same amount of light, whether they are in 
a line with the eye or not, but if one of them stops an 
appreciable proportion of light, there will not be so much 
left to be stopped by the other, and the effect of two 
swarms in a line with the eye will be less than the sum 
of the two effects separately. 

" Now, we know that the effect of the attraction of the 
sun and earth on the moon is not appreciably different 
when the moon is eclipsed than on other occasions when 
full moon occurs without an eclipse. This shows that 
the number of the corpuscules which are stopped by bodies 
of the size and mass of the earth, and even the sun, is 
very small compared with the number which pass straight 
through the earth or the sun without striking a single 
molecule. To the streams of corpuscules the earth and 
the sun are mere systems of atoms scattered in space, 
which present far more openings than obstacles to their 
rectilinear flight. 

" Such is the ingenious doctrine of Le Sage, by which 
he endeavours to explain universal gravitation. Let us 
try to form some estimate of this continual bombardment 



140 PROPERTIES OF MATTEtt. 

of ultramundane corpuscules which is being kept up on 
all sides of us. 

" We have seen that the sun stops but a very small 
fraction of the corpuscules which enter it. The earth, 
being a smaller body, stops a still smaller proportion of 
them. The proportion of those which are stopped by a 
small body, say a 1 Ib. shot, must be smaller still in an 
enormous degree, because its thickness is exceedingly 
small compared with that of the earth. 

" Now, the weight of the ball, or its tendency towards 
the earth, is produced, according to this theory, by the 
excess of the impacts of the corpuscules which come 
from above over the impacts of those which come from 
below, and have passed through the earth. Either of 
these quantities is an exceedingly small fraction of the 
momentum of the whole number of corpuscules which 
pass through the ball in a second, and their difference 
is a small fraction of either, and yet it is equivalent to 
the weight of a pound. The velocity of the corpuscules 
must be enormously greater than that of any of the 
heavenly bodies, otherwise, as may easily be shown, they 
would act as a resisting medium opposing the motion of 
the planets. Now, the energy of a moving system is half 
the product of its momentum into its velocity. Hence 
the energy of the corpuscules, which by their impacts on 
the ball during one second urge it towards the earth, 
must be a number of foot-pounds equal to the number of 
feet over which a corpuscule travels in a second, that is to 
say, not less than thousands of millions. But this is only 
a small fraction of the energy of all the impacts which 
the atoms of the ball receive from the innumerable 
streams of corpuscules which fall upon it in all directions. 

" Hence the rate at which the energy of the corpuscules 



GRAVITATION. 141 

is spent in order to maintain the gravitating property of a 
single pound, is at least millions of millions of foot-pounds 
per second." 

1 64. One common defect of these attempts is, as Clerk- 
Maxwell points out, that they all demand some prime- 
mover, working beyond the limits of the visible universe 
or inside each atom : creating or annihilating matter, 
giving additional speed to spent corpuscles, or in some 
other way supplying the exhaustion suffered in the pro- 
duction .of gravitation. Another defect is that they all 
make gravitation a mere difference-effect as it were ; there- 
by implying the presence of stores of energy absolutely 
gigantic in comparison with anything hitherto observed or 
even suspected to exist, in the universe; and therefore 
demanding the most delicate adjustments, not merely to 
maintain the conservation of energy which we observe, but 
to prevent the whole solar and stellar systems from being 
instantaneously scattered in fragments through space. 

In fact, the cause of gravitation remains undiscovered. 

165. The ordinary balance, as we have already seen, 
merely tests equality of masses. To find the weight of a 
body we must measure directly the earth's attraction for it. 
This can be done, perfectly in principle but only with 
a rude approximation to accuracy in practice, by means 
of a Spring-Balance, or by some other contrivance which 
depends on the elastic resilience of a special kind of matter. 

By far the most accurate instrument for measuring the 
intensity of gravity, from which, of course, the weight of 
any body (whose mass is known) may be immediately 
calculated, is the pendulum. 

A simple pendulum ( 115) exists, of course, only in 
theory ; but by means of a theorem of abstract dynamics 
we can calculate the length of the simple pendulum 



142 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

which will vibrate in the same period as does a mass, 
of any form and dimensions, freely supported in any 
assigned way on a horizontal axis. This the reader must 
take for granted. 1 Hence we can reduce observations 
made with any pendulum to those with the corresponding 
simple pendulum. 

The following expression, whose form is suggested by 
the theory of the Figure of the Earth, and whose constants 
have been determined and verified by pendulum observa- 
tions made all over the world, gives approximately the 
value of g ( 120) at sea-level in any latitude X. 

32-088(1 + 0-00513 sin 2 .x). 

166. We conclude the chapter with a small table of 
(approximate) Specific Gravities, or what is the same thing 
( 36), Densities, and a few remarks suggested by it. 
None of the numbers for solids can be given wich any 
great accuracy (except perhaps those for natural crystals) : 
for, even if the substance be pure, its density may be 
altered to a considerable amount by the processes through 
which it has passed in assuming the state in which it is 
tested. Such a table as the present must be looked on as 
affording materials for rough calculations only. When 
better results are required, special determinations must be 
made for each substance dealt with. 

Hydrogen 0*000089 

Helium . .'"..., . 0-000177 
Steam . . . . > . 0-0006 
Nitrogen . . . . . '001 25 
Air . . . . . - . 0-00129 
Oxygen . . , . . 0*00143 
Argon . . . . ' . . 0*00178 
(The above are at 1 atmosphere; steam (of course) at 100 C., 
the others at C.) 

1 Thomson and Tait's Elements of Nat. Phil., Appendix, g. 



GRAVITATION. 143 

Cork 0-24 

Lithium 0'59 

Potassium 0'86 

Gutta Percha . . . . 0'98 

Water I'OO 

Magnesium . . . . .175 

Quartz 2 '65 

Aluminum ..... 2'67 
Granite, Marble, Slate . .27 

Glass 27 to 4 '5 

Basalt. .... 2-9 

Bromine . . . . .3*0 

Zinc 7'2 

Tin 7'3 

Iron 7'8 

Nickel 87 

Copper 8 '9 

Silver 10'6 

Lead 11-8 

Mercury 13 '6 

Gold 19-4 

Platinum 21 '5 

Indium 22 '4 

[It is well to note that, as the mass of a cubic foot of water is 
about 62'5lbs., these numbers, each multiplied by 62'5, give in 
pounds very nearly the mass per cubic foot of the corresponding 
substance.] 

The chief additional remark suggested by the table is 
that, not only are there bodies which, though liquid at 
ordinary temperatures, are denser than the great majority 
of solids, but that a comparatively moderate pressure, 
such as a few hundred atmospheres, would (without pro- 
ducing liquefaction) make the density of air or oxygen 
greater than that of some solids ; so that, for instance, if 
chemical action could be prevented, we might easily have 
solid lithium floating upwards in compressed oxygen, as a 
cork rises in water. 

The ratio of the densities of iridium and of hydrogen, 



144 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

as given in the table, is about 250,000:1. But, by means 
of a Sprengel pump, the density of the hydrogen might 
easily be reduced to a four-thousandth of its former value. 
Thus we can place beside one another specimens of 
matter, one of which has one thousand million-fold the 
density of the other. Such a comparison may help us to 
understand the possibility of the existence of the lumini- 
ferous medium ; which is certainly matter, yet of a density 
perhaps smaller in comparison with that of attenuated 
hydrogen, than is the latter in comparison with the 
density of iridium. In the present work the ether does 
not come in for treatment. We know it only in so far 
as it is the vehicle of radiation and electrical energy : 
so that it is to works on Light and Electricity the student 
must be referred. 

167. By considering the earth, for a moment, as a 
liquid mass, it is easy (on hydrostatical principles) to 
calculate the whole pressure across any plane section of 
it. 1 This is, of course, the resultant gravitation attraction 
between the parts separated by the plane of section. 
Assuming the result of 154 for the mean density, we 
find that the average attraction, per square foot, across a 
diametral plane is about 18 x 10 8 Ibs. weight. The tenacity 
of sandstone is about 72 x 10 3 Ibs. weight per square foot. 
Thus gravitation is 25,000 times as effectual in keeping 
the earth together, as would be its cohesion if it were solid 
sandstone. Even if the earth were as tenacious as steel, 
its cohesion across a diametral plane would be only about 
1 per cent, of the attraction across it. 

Since the cohesion between two halves of a globe is, 
ceteris paribus, as the area of a diametral plane, i.e. as the 
square of the radius, while the gravitation attraction is 
1 Tait, Proc. M.S.R, 1875. 



GRAVITATION. 145 

as the sixth power of the radius directly, and as the 
square of the radius inversely, a sphere of the earth's 
mean density and of the tenacity of sandstone would 
require to be of about 25 miles radius only, in order that 
cohesion may be as effective as gravity in keeping two 
hemispheres together. If the tenacity were that of steel, 
the radius would be about 400 miles. 

Hence the earth's strength depends almost wholly on 
gravitation, while that of a stone, less than a mile or so 
in diameter, depends almost wholly on cohesion, and the 
more completely the smaller it is. 



CHAPTER VIII. 

PRELIMINARY TO DEFORMABILITY AND ELASTICITY. 

168. A SUBSTANCE is said to be elastic when, on being 
left free, it recovers wholly or partially from a deforma- 
tion ( 41). 

This definition is sometimes given in another form : 
a substance is said to be elastic when it requires the 
continued application of stress to keep it deformed. But 
this is by no means an equivalent of the former state- 
ment ; and, besides, it usually introduces complications ; 
for in many substances the force requisite to maintain a 
distortion becomes less and less with the lapse of time ; 
and the continued application of a given distorting force 
often produces a constantly increasing distortion. To 
this, and to another curious property called the Fatigue 
of Elasticity, we will recur, but we will for the present 
adhere to the first definition given above. 

Hence, as an introduction to this part of the subject, 
we must inquire into the nature and mechanism of the 
simpler kinds of deformation. 

169. The term usually employed for deformation of 
any kind is Strain. The treatment of strains is an 
entirely geometrical, or (more properly) kinematical, 
question. But when we inquire how a strain is produced 



DEFOKMABILITY AND ELASTICITY. 147 

in a given piece of matter, the question becomes a 
dynamical one, and we are led to the notion of a system 
of equilibrating forces, called a Stress. (See, again, 
137.) And we figure to ourselves that every stress 
produces a corresponding strain, which will be of greater 
or less amount as the specimen of matter operated on is 
of more or less yielding quality. 

It is sometimes convenient to speak of the property of 
yielding to a particular stress, as when we speak of the 
Compressibility of a substance ; sometimes it is more con- 
venient to speak of the property of resistance to a stress, 
as when we speak of a body's Rigidity. But the resist- 
ance to a stress is measured by the reciprocal of the 
amount of yielding (just as the electric resistance of a 
wire is the reciprocal of its conducting power), so that 
either of these numerical quantities is immediately 
deducible from the other. 

It will be seen shortly that if P be the measure of 
any one kind of stress, and p that of the corresponding 
strain (supposed small), experiment points to a general 
relation of the form 

where C is a constant depending on the special substance, 
and the special form of stress. C is obviously greater, 
the smaller is the strain for a given stress ; and it there- 
fore measures the resistance of the substance to the 
particular kind of stress denoted by P. 

As stress is force per unit of surface, while strain has 
no dimensions, the dimensions of C in the above expres- 
sion are 

M 



Hence the numerical value of C changes, in passing 



148 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

from one system of units to another, directly as the unit 
of length and the square of the unit of time are increased, 
and inversely as the unit of mass is increased. 

170. We shall not require for our elementary treat- 
ment of the question more than the simplest portions of 
the subject of strain, and shall therefore be concerned 
with Homogeneous Strain only. 

By this term it is implied that all originally similar, 
equal, and similarly situated portions of a substance 
remain after the strain similar, equal, and similarly 
situated, however their forms and dimensions may be 
changed. Hence points originally in a straight line, or 
in a plane, remain in a straight line, or in a plane. Also 
equal parallel lines remain equal parallel lines. There- 
fore a parallelogram remains a parallelogram, an ellipse 
remains an ellipse, a parallelepiped remains a parallel- 
epiped, and an ellipsoid remains an ellipsoid. 

A most important case is that of a sphere inscribed in 
a cube. The diameters which pass through the points of 
contact form a conjugate system : i.e. the tangent plane 
at the extremity of any one of them is parallel to the 
other two. This parallelism is not affected by the strain ; 
so that when the sphere becomes an ellipsoid, the cube 
becomes a parallelepiped whose faces are parallel to a set 
of conjugate planes. Conversely, every set of three con- 
jugate planes of the ellipsoid was originally a set of three 
mutually perpendicular diametral planes of the sphere. 
An immediate consequence of this is that the principal 
axes of the ellipsoid, which are at right angles to one 
another, were originally at right angles to one another in 
the sphere. 

171. Now suppose small, equal, and similarly situated 
cubes to be traced in the unstrained body. This will be 



DEFOKM ABILITY AND ELASTICITY. 149 

effected by three imagined series of equidistant parallel 
planes, those of each series being perpendicular to those 
of the other two. After the strain the cubes become 
equal, similar, and similarly situated parallelepipeds. 
And it is clear that if one of the cubes, and the corre- 
sponding parallelepiped, be given, everything else can be 
determined. 

But there is one special set, of three series of rect- 
angular planes, with which it is best to commence : viz. 
those which, as shown in last section, become the princi- 
pal planes of the ellipsoid which is formed from the 
sphere inscribed in the cube. This elementary consideration 
produces a marvellous simplification of our investigation. 

172. For we now see that every homogeneous strain 
may be looked on as having been produced by uniform 
extensions, or compressions, parallel to three mutually 
perpendicular lines (the amounts parallel to these being 
generally different), and a subsequent rotation of the 
whole as if it were rigid. We shall not require to 
consider the rotation, for we are concerned only with the 
deformation which each small part suffers. 

Thus, taking account of these permissible simplifica- 
tions, we need only inquire into the circumstances under 
which an originally cubical portion of the substance 
becomes in general brick-shaped, without change of the 
directions of its edges. The investigation presents no 
grave difficulties when the strains are of finite magni- 
tude, but we will, for simplicity as well as convenience 
( 174, 177), consider them as small. 

173. We will first consider the particular cases which 
are of greatest importance. 

Nothing need be said of the case where a cube remains 
a cube, though with altered edges, except that it involves 



150 



PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 



uniform dilatation, or a condensation such as is due to hydro- 
static pressure. This is the only strain (except, of course, 
pure rotation) which does not alter the figure of a body. 

But, of the strains which alter the figure of a body, 
without altering its volume, the most important is that 
which converts a cube into a brick shape by lengthening 
in a given ratio one set of parallel edges, shortening a 
second set in the same ratio, and leaving the third set 
unaltered. Here it is obvious that the volume also 
remains unaltered. Let the ratio of extension be 1 + 1 : 1, 
that of contraction will be 1 1 : 1, on account of the 
smallness of the fraction Z in all the cases which we have 




FIG. 15. 

to consider. Let the figure represent (in its successive 
states) one of those faces of the cube, of which all the 
edges have been altered. The square inscribed in that 
face is obviously distorted into a rhombus, of which two 
of the angles are greater, and two less, than right angles, 
by the same amount, 6 suppose. 

Then it is clear that the ratio of the diagonals of the 
rhombus may be expressed in either of the following 
forms : 



DEFORMABILITY AND ELASTICITY. 151 

and thus, as is very small, so that the arc may be 
written in place of its tangent, 

0=2*. 

This shows the relation between the difference of the 
angles of the rhombus from right angles, and the fractional 
alteration of the edges of the original cube. 

174. So far for the strain, let us now consider its 
cause. Every equilibrating system of forces (i.e. every 
stress) can be reduced to simple stresses, each consisting 
of equal and opposite forces in the same line, that is, 
thrusts, or tensions. Thus we have now to inquire what 
thrusts or tensions will convert a cube of deformable 
matter into an assigned brick shape : in which, of course, 
is included the simple case of its remaining a cube, though 
with altered edges. These must evidently be spread 
uniformly over each of its surfaces, for every one of any 
number of smaller equal cubes, into which it may be 
supposed to be divided, suffers precisely the same propor- 
tionate deformation. 

And as ( 172) we confine ourselves to very small 
deformations, any number of them may be superposed, 
without interfering with one another i.e. they may be 
successively inflicted in any order, with the same final 
result. It is mainly for this reason that we restrict 
ourselves to small strains. 

175. The problem is too difficult for an elementary 
work, unless the portion of matter dealt with be not only 
homogeneous, but isotropic, i.e. unless it possess exactly 
the same properties at all parts and in all directions, so 
that the effect of a given stress on a unit cube of it is 
exactly the same however and wherever the cube be cut 
out of the original material. 



152 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

Hence we see that, for cubes which become brick-shaped, 
without change of direction of the edges, the thrusts or 
tensions must each be perpendicular to the face on which 
it acts. And ( 169) we measure each by its amount per 
unit area. 

[It is most particularly to be remarked that, in all that 
follows on this subject, it is understood that the body 
operated on is kept at a definite temperature, alike through- 
out its substance and throughout the whole period of the 
operation. 

The study of the heat developed by sudden applica- 
tions of stress belongs entirely to Thermodynamics, upon 
which we do not enter in this work. In fact, we here 
confine ourselves to Isothermals, and have nothing to do 
with AdiabaticsJ] 

176. The simplest case of all, and that which alone 
we require when we deal with fluids, is when the stress is 
pressure or tension, the same on each face of the cube. 
Here the cube obviously remains a cube, but its edges 
are diminished or increased in length. Let unit of edge 
become 1 -/ (where / is very small) under pressure P 
per square unit of each face ; what is called hydrostatic 
pressure, pressure the same in all directions, and always 
normal to the surface. Then the volume of unit cube 
becomes 1 3/. 

The compressibility of an isotropic body is measured by 
the ratio of the compression per unit volume to the hydro- 
static pressure applied. 

Hence the compressibility is 3//P, and the Resistance 
to compression ( 169), usually called k, is P/3/, so that 



177. When we deal with solids, in which the stress is 



DEFORMABILITY AND ELASTICITY. 151 

not necessarily of the nature of hydrostatic pressure, some 
further considerations must be attended to. 

We now assume, consistently with experiment (as will 
afterwards be shown), that, if the strain produced by any 
stress be small, the reversed stress will produce exactly 
the reversed strain. This is another reason ( 172) for 
confining our work to small strains. 

Suppose the pairs of opposite faces of a cube be called A, 
B, and C ; the edges joining the corners of each pair a, b, 
c, respectively. Then a tension P, per unit of area, on the 
A faces will increase a in some definite ratio 1 +p : 1, and 
diminish b and c in some common ratio 1 q:l. Now 
superpose a pressure P, per unit area, on the B faces. 
Since the body is isotropic this will compress b in the 
ratio 1 - p : 1, and extend a and c in the ratio 1 + q : 1. 
Hence the result of tension P on the A faces and pres- 
sure P on the B faces is that a is extended in the ratio 
1 +p + q : 1, b is compressed in the ratio I p-q:l t 
while the length of c is unaltered. 

The effect is, therefore, (as in 173) to change the 
form of each section of the cube parallel to the C faces, 
but to leave the area of that section and the volume of 
the cube unaltered. This strain is called a Simple 
Shear, and the corresponding stress is called Shearing 
Stress. 

There is, however, another mode of looking at this 
matter, to which we must devote a little space. It is 
usual, in defining Rigidity, to consider the deformation 
produced in the unit cube by equal tangential forces, 
applied to two pairs of its sides, in directions parallel 
to the third pair of sides, as indicated in the diagram 
below. These forces, as shown in the figure, obviously 
constitute a balancing system, or Stress. But it may be 




154 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

analysed into a much simpler one. For, if we draw 
either diagonal in the figure, the resultant of the forces 
applied to either pair of faces on 
one side of it is easily seen to 
be P v /2, in a direction perpen- 
dicular to the diagonal. But the 
length of the diagonal is J2. 
Hence the stress perpendicular to 
either diagonal plane is P per 
square unit. And it is clearly a 
pressure perpendicular to one dia- 
gonal plane, and a tension perpen- 
dicular to the other. It is therefore the system already 
studied in 177, and the effect on the cube above is that 
studied in 173. 

178. We now define as follows : 

The rigidity of an isotropic solid (i.e. the resistance to 
change of form under a stress such as that in the above 
figure) is directly proportional to the tangential force per 
unit area, and inversely as the change of one of the angles 
of the figure. 

Hence, using the common designation, it, and calling 6 
(as before) the change of each of the angles of the figure, 

we have 

Rigidity -n-P/0, 

or, by 173, 177, 

P+l-1 ..,.. (1.) 

179. But, by 177, the effect of pressure P, applied 
simultaneously to all the sides of the cube, would be to 
reduce the lengths of the edges in the common ratio 

or (approximately) 



DEFOKMABILITY AND ELASTICITY. 155 

Hence by 176, where it is obvious that / stands for 
what we now call p - 2q ; 

P-2<1 = ^ .... (2.) 
180. From (1) and (2) we have at once 



These represent respectively the extension of one set of 
edges of the unit cube, and the common contraction of 
the other two, when it is subjected to tension P parallel 
to the former set. 

[These results might have been obtained, perhaps even 
more simply, by assuming the existence of compressibility 
with absolute rigidity, then assuming pliability with 
absolute incompressibility, and superposing the effects. 
But the logic of this process is more likely to puzzle the 
beginner.] 

181. Hence the extension, per unit of length, of a rod 
or bar, under longitudinal tension P per square inch of its 
cross-section, is 

p 3k+n 
~Wcn' 

The applications of this formula are very numerous 
and important, as will be seen in 224, &c., below. 

The corresponding diminution, per unit area, of cross- 
section is 



And thus the increase per unit volume is P/3&, a result 



156 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

which we might have obtained directly in many other 
ways. 

Thus, in pulling out an india-rubber band with a given 
tension, we increase its volume by one-third of the amount 
by which it would be diminished by hydrostatic pressure 
of the same value. 

Also by pulling out a truly cylindrical and uniform 
tube, filled to a definite mark with a liquid, we may 
measure directly the value of k for the matter of the 
tube. 

182. From the foregoing formulae the result of the 
application of any (moderate) stress to an isotropic body 
can be calculated. 

As an example, suppose we desire to find what stress 
will produce extension of an isotropic bar or cylinder 
unaccompanied by lateral change of any kind. 

If we have tensions, P along, and P' in all directions 
perpendicular to, the axis of the bar, we have for the 
longitudinal extension ( 177) 

, 2F 
P-^*i 

and for the extension in any radial direction 

P>_P + P' 
P P ~ q ' 

The latter must vanish, by our assumed condition, so that 



which gives the required relation between P' and P ; and 
thus the extension is 

P 



183. In the chapters which immediately follow, it 



DEFOEMABILITY AND ELASTICITY. 157 

will be seen that to determine the compressibility of a 
fluid we require (at least in all the ordinary modes of 
experimenting) to know the distortion produced in the 
vessel which contains it. 

When the same hydrostatic pressure is applied simul- 
taneously to the outside of the vessel and to its contents, 
the correction for diminution of the interior volume is of 
course, 176, 212, PV/&: where P is the pressure per 
unit surface, V the interior volume, and k the reciprocal 
of the compressibility of the material of the vessel. This 
is to be added to the apparent compression of the fluid. 

But when the pressure on the vessel is mainly internal 
(as in Andrews' experiments on carbonic acid, 205), 
or wholly external (as in glass manometers, 233), the 
correction is not so simple. It can, in every case, be 
determined by means of the equations of 180 ; but the 
investigation even of symmetrical cases is beyond the 
limits here imposed on us. We therefore merely state 
the results for the forms of vessel most commonly used, 
viz. tubes and bulbs. For simplicity we assume the 
tubes to be cylindrical, and the bulbs to be spherical, 
each being of uniform material and of uniform thickness 
throughout. The internal and external radii are, in 
both cases, denoted by and a^ respectively ; and the 
cylinders are supposed free to alter in length as well as 
in cross-section. 

Then the diminution per unit of content, by external 
hydrostatic pressure P, is 



In cylinders 
In spheres 




158 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

The increase per unit of content, by internal hydro- 
static pressure F, is 



In cylinders F 

In spheres F V 3 fU^|Y 
a i -o \* V*/ 



When there are simultaneous hydrostatic pressures out- 
side and inside, the corresponding results, calculated 
from these expressions, are to be simply superposed 
( 174). 

Thus, if P and P' be simultaneous and equal, we have, 
alike in cylinders and spheres, for the diminution of 
unit internal content, P/& as above. 

When an exceedingly thick vessel (at least a vessel in 
which al is very small in comparison with a-f) is exposed 
to internal pressure only, the effect on unit of its content 
practically depends on its rigidity alone, and is P'/n for 
a cylinder, and 3P'/4w< for a sphere. This is a very 
striking result. 

When such a vessel is exposed to external pressure 
the result is 



For cylinders P (1 + ~\ 



For spheres P (- + ^ 
\k 4% 

This shows the fallacy of the too common notion that, 
by making the bulb of a thermometer thick enough, we 
enable it to " defy pressure" ', as, for instance, when it is 
to be employed to measure temperatures in a sounding 
of 3000 or 4000 fathoms. 

184. It is very interesting to study the cases of 
heterogeneous strain presented by the walls of cylinders 



DEFORMABILITY AND ELASTICITY. 159 

and bulbs when the internal and external hydrostatic 
pressures are different. The following data will show 
the student the form and volume of the strain-ellipsoid, 
i.e. the ellipsoid into which a very small part of the wall, 
originally spherical, is distorted. "We give the formulae 
for a cylinder under external pressure. Let the original 
position of the centre of the little sphere be at a distance, 
r (intermediate, of course, between and a^, from the 
axis. Then it is deformed into an ellipsoid, whose axes 
are (a) radial, (/?) parallel to the axis of the cylinder, 
(y) at right angles to these two. If we denote by 1 the 
original radius of the little sphere, the semi-axes of the 
ellipsoid are 




These are, in order of increasing magnitude, (/?), (y), (a). 
The axes (ft) and (y) are always reduced in length, but 
the radial axis (a) will be increased in length by the 

07. 

strain provided r 2 < a 2 . 

In ordinary flint glass this condition becomes, approxi- 
mately 



So that the interior layers of a glass tube, exposed to 
external pressure only, are always extended in the radial 
direction. This extension is greatest at the interior 
surface, and vanishes in the layer whose radius is about 



160 PKOPE.RTIES OF MATTER. 

1 '6a . If the external radius be greater than this, the 
outer layers are radially compressed, and the more the 
farther they lie beyond the limit of no extension. 

185. The theory of the propagation of Waves, whether 
of compression or of distortion, in an elastic body, is 
beyond our limits ; but we may make the statement 
that, if we could set aside the effects of sudden stress 
in producing changes of temperature, and thus altering 
the coefficients of compressibility and rigidity (for this 
question belongs properly to Thermodynamics), the rates 
of propagation of waves of different kinds depend only 
upon one or both of the elastic constants (k and n), and 
upon the density of the body. When the coefficients 
are measured in terms of the weight of unit bulk of 
the body, they are called Moduli. Hitherto we have 
measured them in terms of pressure or tension, i.e. force 
per unit area. But, if we measure the force by the 
length of the column of the substance, of unit section, 
whose weight it can just support, we obviously take 
account of the weight of unit bulk. Now the theoretical 
result (under the conditions above specified) is that the 
speed of a wave is that which would be acquired by 
a free body falling, under uniform gravity, through a 
height equal to half the length of the modulus corre- 
sponding to the particular kind of distortion which is 
propagated. Thus the speed of sound in air or water 
depends upon the value of k alone ; that of a shearing 
wave, such as light and some forms of earthquake, on n 
alone. When a wave of extension is sent along a wire, 
as (for instance) to set a distant railway signal, Young's 
modulus ( 224) comes in; and, when we deal with 
plane sound-waves in a solid, we must take the corre- 
sponding modulus as given in 182. 



CHAPTER IX. 

COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS. 

186. A VERY general proof of compressibility and of 
elasticity of bulk is afforded at once by the fact that the 
great majority of bodies are capable of transmitting 
sound-waves. For the propagation of sound consists 
essentially in the handing on by resilience, from layer to 
layer of the medium, of a state of compression or dilata- 
tion ; the (small) disturbance of each particle taking 
place to and fro in the direction in which the sound is 
travelling. All ordinary sounds are propagated in air. 
But the rate of passage of sound has been measured in 
the water of the Lake of Geneva and elsewhere ; and 
miners are in the habit of signalling to one another by 
the sounds (of taps with a pick) conveyed through solid 
rock. 

187. Compressibility, elasticity, and inertia of air 
are all demonstrated by the action of an air-gun. Its 
reservoir is charged, by means of a pump, with some 
forty or sixty times the quantity of air which it would 
contain at the normal pressure and temperature ; the 
moment the valve is thrust down, by the fall of the 
hammer, a portion of the air is forced out by its elas- 
ticity ; and this rapid stream, by its inertia, communi- 

L 



162 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

cates motion to the bullet. The same thing is shown, 
in a very beautiful form, by allowing the compressed air 
to escape in a fine jet; for a ball of cork can be sus- 
pended in the jet, as a metal shell is suspended in a 
fountain-jet of water, but in this case without any visible 
support. 

188. In 1662 Robert Boyle published his Defence of 
the Doctrine touching the Spring and Weight of the Air. 
The following extract, especially, is still of great interest. 
It occurs in Part II. chap. v. 

" We took then a long Glass - Tube, which by a 
dexterous hand and the help of Lamp was in such a 
manner crooked at the bottom, that the part turned up 
was almost parallel to the rest of the Tube, and the 
Orifice of this shorter leg of the Siphon (if I may so call 
the whole Instrument) being Hermetically seal'd, the 
length of it was divided into Inches (each of which was 
subdivided into eight parts) by a straight list of paper, 
which containing those Divisions was carefully pasted all 
along it : then putting in as much Quicksilver as served 
to fill the Arch or bended part of the Siphon, that the 
Mercury standing in a level might reach in the one leg 
to the bottom of the divided paper, and just to the same 
height or Horizontal line in the other ; we took care, by 
frequently inclining the Tube, so that the Air might 
freely pass from one leg into the other by the sides of 
the Mercury, (we took (I say) care) that the Air at last 
included in the shorter Cylinder should be of the same 
laxity with the rest of the Air about it. This done, we 
began to pour Quicksilver into the longer leg of the 
Siphon, which by its weight pressing up that in the 
shorter leg, did by degrees streighten the included Air : 
and continuing this pouring in of Quicksilver till the Air 



COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS. 163 

in the shorter leg was by condensation reduced to take 
up but half the space it possess'd (I say, possess' d not 
fill'd) before ; we cast our eyes upon the longer leg of the 
Glass, on which was likewise pasted a list of Paper care- 
fully divided into Inches and parts, and we observed, not 
without delight and satisfaction, that the quicksilver in 
that longer part of the Tube was 29. Inches higher than 
the other. Now that this Observation does both very 
well agree with and confirm our Hypothesis, will be easily 
discerned by him that takes notice that we teach, and 
Monsieur Paschall and our English friends Experiments 
prove, that the greater the weight is that leans upon the 
Air, the more forcible is its endeavour of Dilatation, and 
consequently its power of resistance, (as other Springs 
are stronger when bent by greater weights.) For this 
being considered it wil appear to agree rarely- well with 
the Hypothesis, that as according to it the Air in that 
degree of density and correspondent measure of resistance 
to which the weight of the incumbent Atmosphere had 
brought it, was able to counterbalance and resist the 
pressure of a Mercurial Cylinder of about 29. Inches, as 
we are taught by the Torricellian Experiment ; so here 
the same Air being brought to a degree of density about 
twice as great as that it had before, obtains a Spring 
twice as strong as formerly. As may appear by its being 
able to sustain or resist a Cylinder of 29. Inches in the 
longer Tube, together with the weight of the Atmo- 
spherical Cylinder, that lean'd upon those 29. Inches of 
Mercury ; and, as we just now inferr'd from the Torri- 
cellian Experiment, was equivalent to them. 

" We were hindered from prosecuting the tryal at that 
time by the casual breaking of the Tube. But because 
an accurate Experiment of this nature would be of great 



184 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

importance to the Doctrine of the Spring of the Air, 
and has not yet been made (that I know) by any man ; 
and because also it is more uneasie to be made , > 
then one would think, in regard of the diffi- 
culty as well of procuring crooked Tubes fit for 
the purpose, as of making a just estimate of 
the true place of the Protuberant Mercury's 
surface; I suppose it will not be unwelcome 
to the Reader, to be informed that after some 
other tryals, one of which we made in a Tube 
whose longer leg was perpendicular, and the 
other, that contained the Air, parallel to the 
Horizon, we at last procured a Tube of the 
Figure exprest in the Scheme ; which Tube, 
though of a pretty bigness, was so long, that 
the Cylinder whereof the shorter leg of it 
consisted admitted a list of Paper, which had 
before been divided into 12. Inches and their 
quarters, and the longer leg admitted another 
list of Paper of divers foot in length, and 
divided after the same manner : then Quick- 
silver being poured in to fill up the bended 
part of the Glass, that the surface of it in 
either leg might rest in the same Horizontal 
line, as we lately taught, there was more and " 
more Quicksilver poured into the longer Tube ; 
and notice being watchfully taken how far 
the Mercury was risen in that longer Tube 
when it appeared to have ascended to any FlG - 17 - 
of the divisions in the shorter Tube, the several 
Observations that were thus successively made, and as 
they were made set down, afforded us the ensuing 
Table. 



COMPKESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS. 165 



A TABLE OF THE CONDENSATION OF THE Am. 



A. 



A. 



12 



11 



10 



4 
3| 

3i 

3 



B. 



C. 



00 



02H 
04* 
06* 



10* 
12* 
15* 
17** 
21* 
25* 
29H 
32* 
34** 
37H 
41* 
45... 



58* 



71* 
78H 
88* 



nto 
<M 

3 



D. 



29* 
30* 
31** 
33* 
35* 
37... 



41** 



47* 
50* 



61* 
64* 
67* 
70H 
74* 



82** 



93* 
100* 
107H 
117* 



E. 



29* 

30* 

31** 

33f 

35... 

361| 

41* 



46| 
50... 



63* 

66f 

70... 



77* 

82* 
87f 



107* 
116* 



A. A. The number of 
equal spaces in the 
shorter leg, that con- 
tained the same par- 
cel of Air diversely 
extended. 

B. The height of the 
Mercurial Cylinder 
in the longer leg, 
that compress'd the 
Air into those 
dimensions. 

C. The height of a Mer- 
curial Cylinder that 
counterbalanc'd the 
pressure of the At- 
mosphere. 

D. The Aggregate 
of the two last 
Columns, B and C, 
exhibiting the pres- 
sure sustained by 
the included Air. 

E. What that pressure 
should be according 
to the Hypothesis, 
that supposes the 
pressures and ex- 
pansions to be in 
reciprocal propor- 
tion." 



189. The form of apparatus employed by Boyle is still 
recognised as by far the best for the purpose. With a 
few necessary modifications, to adapt it to difference of 
circumstances, it was employed by Amagat l in the most 
important recent experimental determinations of the 
effects of great pressures on the volume of a gas. 

Its action depends on the two hydrostatical principles 

1 Annales de Chimie, 1880. 



166 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

stated below, the truth of which we are here content to 
assume. 1 

In a mass of fluid, at rest, the pressure (per square inch) 
is the same at all points in any horizontal plane. 

The change of pressure from one Jiorizontal plane to 
anotlwr is equal to the weight of a column of the fluid, one 
square inch in section, extending vertically between these 
planes. 

From these it follows that the pressure of the gas 
operated on, i.e. the pressure on the mercury surface at 
A (Fig. 17) is the same as that at the same level, B, in 
the other branch of the tube : and this, again, exceeds 
the pressure at C (the atmospheric pressure), by the 
weight of a column of mercury of square inch section and 
of height BC. 

190. In his comments on this experiment Boyle 
says : 

"For the better understanding of this Experiment it 
may not be amiss to take notice of the following particu- 
lars : 

" 3. That we were two to make the observation to- 
gether, the one to take notice at the bottom how the 
Quicksilver rose in the shorter cylinder, and the other 
to pour it in at the top of the longer, it being very hard 
and troublesome for one man alone to do both accurately. 

" 6. That when the Air was so compress'd, as to be 
crouded into less than a quarter of the space it possess'd 
before, we tryed whether the cold of a Linen Cloth dipp'd 
in water would then condense it. And it sometimes 

1 See, for instance, Thomson and Tait, Elements of Natural 
Philosophy, 692, 694. 



COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS. 167 

seemed a little to shrink, but not so manifestly as that 
we dare build anything upon it. We then tryed likewise 
whether heat would notwithstanding so forcible a corn- 
pressure dilate it, and approaching the flame of a Candle 
to that part where the Air was pent up, the heat had a 
more sensible operation than the cold had before ; so 
that we scarce doubted but that the expansion of the Air 
would notwithstanding the weight that opprest it have 
been made conspicuous, if the fear of unseasonably 
breaking the Glass had not kept us from increasing the 
heat. 

" And there is no cause to doubt, that if we had been 
here furnished with a greater quantity of Quicksilver and 
a very strong Tube, we might by a further compression of 
the included Air have made it counterbalance the pres- 
sure of a far taller and heavier Cylinder of Mercury. 
For no man perhaps yet knows how near to an infinite 
compression the Air may be capable of, if the compressing 
force be competently increast. 

" And to let you see that we did not (a little above) 
inconsiderately mention the weight of the incumbent 
Atmospherical Cylinder as a part of the weight resisted 
by the imprisoned Air, we will here annex, that we took 
care, when the Mercurial Cylinder in the longer leg of 
the Pipe was about an hundred Inches high, to cause 
one to suck at the open Orifice ; whereupon (as we ex- 
pected) the Mercury in the Tube did notably ascend. . . . 
And therefore we shall render this reason of it. That 
the pressure of the Incumbent Air being in part taken 
off by its expanding it self into the Sucker's dilated chest ; 
the imprison'd Air was thereby enabled to dilate it self 



168 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

manifestly, and repel the Mercury that comprest it, till 
there was an equality of force betwixt the strong Spring 
of that comprest Air on the one part, and the tall Mer- 
curial Cylinder, together with the contiguous dilated Air, 
on the other part." 

It is scarcely necessary to call attention to the truly 
scientific caution with which Boyle thus gives his con 
elusions from this notable experiment. 

191. BOYLE'S LAW (as it is called in Britain) is now 
stated in the extended form : 

TJie volume of a given mass of gas, kept at a given 
temperature, is inversely as the pressure. 1 
In symbols this is merely 

jw-C . . . . . (1.) 

where C is a quantity depending upon the mass of gas, 
and on its temperature. [This law is only approximately 
true. In 196-207 below the relation between pressure 
and volume will be more exactly stated.] 

From the definition of density as the quantity of 
matter per unit of volume, we see at once that Boyle's 
Law may be stated in the form 

The density of a gas, at constant temperature, is propor- 
tional to the pressure. 

192. The compressibility follows at once. For a 
small increase, &, in the pressure, corresponds to a small 
diminution, to, in the volume, such that we still have 

(p + za}(v - ) = C = pv. 

Neglecting the product of the two small quantities we 
have 



1 This Law usually goes by the name of Mariotte in foreign 
books. See Appendix IV. 



COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS. 169 

Here the change, per unit of volume, is at/v, so that 
the compressibility ( 176) is 

=1. 

arv p 

The resistance to compression is therefore proportional to 
the pressure; i.e. inversely as the volume. This result 
was obtained by a graphic process in 176 above. 

193. So closely does air follow Boyle's Law through 
all ordinary ranges of pressure, that it is constantly used 
in Manometers for the direct measurement of pressure. 
The manometer is, in its elements, merely a carefully 
calibrated tube containing dry air, from whose volume 
(when it is kept at constant temperature) the pressure is 
at once calculated. 

The chief defect of such manometers is that successive 
equal increments of pressure produce gradually diminish- 
ing effects on the volume of the gas; and thus the 
inevitable errors of observation become more serious, in 
proportion to the quantity to be measured, as higher 
pressures are attained. Various ingenious devices, such 
as tubes of tapering bore, have been devised to remedy 
this defect. In all such modifications most careful 
calibration is essential. 

194. All gases, at temperatures considerably above 
what is called their critical point ( 55, 206), follow 
Boyle's Law fairly through a somewhat extensive range of 
pressures. But a gas, at a temperature under its critical 
point, is really a vapour, and can be reduced (without 
change of temperature) to the liquid state by the appli- 
cation of sufficient pressure, at least if nuclei be present. 
The compression of vapours will be treated farther on. 

195. So far, we have been dealing with the effects of 
increased pressure. But Boyle carried his inquiry into 



170 



PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 



the effects of diminution of pressure also. His apparatus 
was of a very simple kind, though still useful, at least 
for class illustration. The following extract, while highly 
interesting, sufficiently describes his results and method : 

"A TABLE OF THE KAREFACTION OF THE Am. 



A. B. 



2 

3 
4 
5 
6 

7 
8 
9 

10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
20 
24 
28 
32 



oo 

lOf 

2of 
22f 



25| 

26f 

26f 

27i 

27| 

27f 

27J 

28 + 

28| 

28f 

28! 



C. 



D. 



E. 



29| 



2|t 
Iff 

ll! 

OHI 



A. The number of equal spaces 
at the top of the Tube, that 
contained the same parcel of 
Air. 

B. The height of the Mercurial 
Cylinder, that together with 
the spring of the included 
Air, counterbalanced the 
pressure of the Atmosphere. 

C. The pressure of the Atmos- 
phere. 

D. The Complement of B to C, 
exhibiting the pressure sus- 
tained by the included Air. 

E. What that pressure should 
be according to the Hypo- 
thesis. 



" To make the Experiment of the debilitated force of 
expanded Air the plainer, 'twill not be amiss to note some 
particulars, especially touching the manner of making the 
Tryal ; which (for the reasons, lately mention'd) we made 
on a lightsome pair of stairs, and with a Box also lin'd 
with Paper to receive the Mercury that might be spilt. 
And in regard it would require a vast and in few places 
procurable quantity of Quicksilver, to employ Vessels of 
such kind as are ordinary in the Torricellian Experiment, 
we made use of a Glass-Tube of about six foot long, for 



COMPKESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS. 171 

that being Hermetically seal'd at one end, serv'd our 
turn as well as if we could have made the Experiment in 
a Tub or Pond of Seventy Inches deep. 

" Secondly, We also provided a slender Glass-Pipe of 
about the bigness of a Swan's Quill, and open at both 
ends ; all along which was pasted a narrow list of Paper 
divided into Inches and half quarters. 

" Fourthly, There being, as near as we could guess, 
little more than an Inch of the slender Pipe left above 
the surface of the restagnant Mercury, and consequently 
unfill'd therewith, the prominent orifice was carefully 
clos'd with sealing Wax melted ; after which the Pipe 
was let alone for a while, that the Air dilated a little by 
the heat of the Wax, might upon refrigeration be reduc'd 
to its wonted density. . . . 

" Sixthly, The Observations being ended, we presently 
made the Torricellian Experiment with the above mention'd 
great Tube of six foot long, that we might know the 
height of the Mercurial Cylinder, for that particular day 
and hour ; which height we found to be 29f Inches. 

"Seventhly, Our Observations made after this manner 
furnish'd us with the preceding Table, in which there 
would not probably have been found the difference here 
set down betwixt the force of the Air when expanded to 
double its former dimensions, and what that force should 
have been precisely according to the Theory, but that the 
included Inch of Air receiv'd some little accession during 
the Tryal ; which this newly- mention'd difference making 
us suspect, we found by replunging the Pipe into the 
Quicksilver, that the included Air had gain'd about half 
an eighth, which we guest to have come from some little 



172 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

aerial bubbles in the Quicksilver, contained in the Pipe 
(so easie is it in such nice Experiments to miss of 
exactness)." 

196. We must now state how far these results of 
Boyle have been verified by modem experimenters, and in 
what direction they are found to deviate from the truth. 
But before we do so we must introduce a definition. 

The unit usually adopted for the measurement of 
pressure is called an Atmosphere, roughly 147 Ibs. weight 
per square inch. 

Its definition is, in this country, the weight of a column 
of mercury at C., of a square inch in section, and 
29*905 inches high; the weighing to be reduced to the 
value of gravity at the sea-level in the latitude of London. 
(See 165.) 

The value of an atmosphere, in C.G.S. units, is about 
1,014,000 dynes per square centimetre. 

197. It is to Eegnault that we owe the first really 
adequate treatment of the subject, but the range of 
pressures he employed was not very extensive. 

Regnault showed that air and nitrogen are, for at least 
the first twenty atmospheres, more compressed than if 
Boyle's Law were true, but that hydrogen is less 
compressed. 

Then Natterer made an extensive but rough series of 
experiments at very high pressures (sometimes nearly 
3000 atmospheres), whose result showed that air and 
nitrogen, as well as hydrogen, are less compressible than 
Boyle's Law requires, and deviate the more from it the 
higher the pressure. 

198. Andrews, 1 in his classical researches which 
established the existence of the critical point ( 55), first 

1 Phil. Trans., 1869. 



COMPKESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS. 173 

gave the means of explaining this very singular fact. 
We will recur to it when we are dealing with vapours, 
but we give a few of Andrews' data here. The way in 
which the compressibility varies with pressure is obvious 
from the curves in the diagram ( 205), when interpreted 
as in 176. But from Andrews' tables of corresponding 
volumes of air at 13-1, and carbonic acid at 35'5, 
subjected simultaneously to each of a series of increasing 
pressures, we extract the numbers in the two first 
columns : 

CARBONIC ACID (GAS) AT 35 '5 C. 



Recip. of Vol. Recip. of Vol. of 

of Air. Carbonic Acid. 

81-28 228-0 

86-60 351-9 

89-52 373-7 

92-64 387-9 

99-57 411-0 

107-6 430-2 



pv for Garb. Acid. 

356 
246 
239 
239 
242 
250 



Andrews points out that the deviation of air from 
Boyle's Law is, even at the highest of these pressures, 
inconsiderable. Taking the reciprocals of the volumes 
of air, therefore, as measuring pressures with sufficient 
accuracy, we form the third column of the table. This 
shows that in carbonic acid, a few degrees above its 
critical point, the deviation from Boyle's Law is like 
that in air and nitrogen for the first 90 atmospheres, 
and, after that, resembles that in hydrogen. Unfor- 
tunately the bursting of the tubes prevented Andrews 
from carrying the pressure beyond 108 atmospheres. 

199. The remarkable researches of Amagat already 
alluded to ( 189) were carried out in a gallery of a deep 
coal-pit, where the temperature remained steady for long 



174 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

periods. The shorter branch of his apparatus, that which 
contained the gas whose compression was to be measured, 
terminated in a very strong glass tube of small bore, care- 
fully calibrated. The longer branch was made of steel, 
and extended to a height of 330 metres (about 1000 feet) 
up the shaft of the pit. A small but powerful pump was 
employed to force mercury into the lower part of the 
apparatus until it began to run out at one of a set of stop- 
cocks which were inserted at measured intervals along the 
tall tube. Then a measurement of the volume of the 
compressed gas was made, the stopcock closed, and that 
next above it opened in turn for a measurement at a 
higher pressure. 

200. The following short table gives an idea of Ama- 
gat's earlier results 1 for air at ordinary temperature : 

Pressure in Atmospheres. pv. 

1-00 1-0000 

31-67 '9880 

45-92 -9832 

59-53 -9815 

73-03 -9804 

84-21 -9806 

94-94 -98] 4 

110-82 -9830 

133-51 -9905 

176-17 1-0113 

233-68 1-0454 

282-29 1-0837 

329-18 1-1197 

400-05 1-1897 

[As Amagat's pressure data were obtained direct from a 
column of mercury, they supply by far the most accurate 

1 Ann. de Chimie, 1880 ; supplemented from Comptes fiendus, 
1884. 



COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS. 175 

means of finding the unit for pressure gauges. Hence it 
may be well to note that, at ordinary temperatures, for a 
pressure of 152*3 atmospheres, or one ton- weight per 
square inch, dry air almost exactly follows Boyle's Law, 
i.e. it is reduced to 1/152-3 of its volume at one atmosphere. 
Hence, practically, when dry air is compressed to anything 
from 1/140 to 1/160 of its bulk under one atmosphere, 
Boyle's Law may be used to calculate the pressure.] 

It is very difficult to assign with exactness the position 
of the minimum value of pv, as inevitable errors of 
observation may rise to considerable importance when a 
quantity varies very slowly ; but it may be put down as 
corresponding to about 78 atmospheres. 

201. Amagat's direct measures with the mercury 
column were made on the volume of nitrogen. But 
when these had been carefully made, once for all, the 
nitrogen manometer was used in connection with a similar 
instrument filled with some other gas. Thus the relation 
of pv to p was determined with accuracy for hydrogen, 
oxygen, air (as above), carbonic oxide, carbonic acid, 
ethylene, etc. In later papers 1 Amagat has extended 
these results through a considerable range of temperatures. 
For the numerical data we must refer to the papers them- 
selves ; but we reproduce three of the most important of 
his graphic representations of the earlier results. 

The diagram following consists of two parts. The 
upper part shows the relation of pv to p, through a range 
of about 80 C., for nitrogen, whose behaviour is typical of 
that of a large number of gases. The minimum value of 
pv is distinctly shown at every temperature. The lower 
diagram exhibits the exceptional case of hydrogen, where 
all the curves are, practically, straight lines. The 
1 Annales de Chimie, xxii. 1881, xxix. 1893. 




FIG. 18. 



COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS. 177 

pressure unit is a metre of mercury, i.e. 100/76 atmos- 
pheres. 

The diagram on the next page shows the corresponding 
relations for carbonic acid, at temperatures above its 
critical point ; as well as for liquid carbonic acid at 18*2 
C. In this last case the curve is given only for pressures 
from 80 to 260 metres of mercury. This diagram gives 
very valuable information. Especially it shows the 
marked influence of change of temperature on the pressure 
corresponding to the minimum value of pv. Ethylene 
gives a diagram somewhat resembling this, but the 
changes in the value of pv are so disproportionately 
greater that its behaviour could not be satisfactorily 
exhibited on a scale so restricted as a page of this book. 

The reader should be reminded that, had the law of 
Boyle been accurate, all of these curves would have been 
simply horizontal straight lines. 

The more recent researches of Amagat, 1 above referred 
to, have extended this enquiry to the results of very much 
higher pressures, such as 3000 atmospheres, under which 
the density of gaseous oxygen becomes greater than that 
of water. The exact measurement of these great pressures 
was effected by means of an exceedingly ingenious instru- 
ment, the Manometre d pistons Ubres, which Amagat con- 
structed for the purpose. In this instrument there are 
two pistons, of very different sectional area, subjected to 
the same total thrust. Thus the pressure (per square inch) 
on each is inversely as its section. The pressure on the 
smaller piston is that of the substance compressed, that 
on the larger is measured directly by means of a column 
of mercury. The unit for graduation (which of course 
depends on the ratio of the effective sections of the 

1 Comptes Rendus, Sept. 1888. 

M 



m 



\\\\ 






2O W 60 80 WO 






FIG. 19. 



COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS. 179 

pistons) was determined, once for all, by comparison with 
the nitrogen gauge. The special feature of this instru- 
ment, on which its precision depends, is that the pistons 
fit all but tightly in their cylinders ; a very thin layer of 
viscous fluid passing with extreme slowness between each 
piston and its cylinder. Exact adjustment is secured by 
giving slight rotation to each piston in its bearings. For 
the larger piston castor-oil is used, for the smaller treacle. 
But each piston, before being inserted, is most carefully 
lubricated with neats-foot oil. We have been thus 
particular in describing the main characteristics of this 
instrument, because it supplies efficiently what has long 
been felt as an extremely serious want in the physical 
laboratory. 

The pressure which reduced the gas to a given volume 
was determined by an electrical method which will 
presently be described (211). In the table below, 1 the 
volume of each gas at C. and one atmosphere is taken 
as unit ; and the temperature throughout was about 1 5 C. 

TRUE VOLUMES OF VARIOUS GASES ABOUT 15 C. UNDER 

VERY GREAT PRESSURES. 
Volumes. 



Pressure in 
Atmospheres. 


Air. 
157. 


Nitrogen. 
16-0. 


Oxygen. 
15 '6. 


Hydrogen. 
15 -4. 


1000 


0020615 


0021340 


0018000 


0017780 


1500 


17935 


18540 


15710 


14180 


2000 


16430 


16990 


14440 


12225 


2500 


15420 


15960 


13600 


11010 


3000 


14660 


15225 


12960 


10125 



Amagat found the compressibility of the glass employed 
to be about 0*0000023 per atmosphere. As the pres- 
sures were equal inside and outside his piezometer, this 
was the only elastic coefficient required. ( 183.) 
1 Ann. de Chimie, xxix., 1893. 



180 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

Thus, referring to 166, we see that oxygen at 15 has 
almost reached the density of water at a pressure of 2500 
atmospheres. Even nt 1000 atmospheres it has about 
three-fourths of the density of water. 

202. There is, unfortunately, a considerable variety of 
statement as to the relation between pressure and volume 
in air and other gases, when they are considerably rare- 
fied. This is not to be wondered at, for the experimental 
difficulties are extremely great. 

The experiments of Mendeleeff gave a gradual descent 
of value of pv, in air, from 

1-0000 at -85 atm. 
to 

0-9655 at 0'019 atm. 

These would tend to show that, at pressures lower than 
an atmosphere, air behaves as hydrogen does for pressures 
above an atmosphere. 

The experiments of Amagat do not show this result. 
They rather seem to indicate that pv remains practically 
constant for air, from one atmosphere down to at least 
g^th of an atmosphere. 

203. But the real difficulty in all such experiments 
arises from the shortness of the column of mercury by 
which the pressure must be measured. It is not easy to 
see how this difficulty can be obviated without introduc- 
ing a chance of graver errors of another kind, due for in- 
stance to vapour-pressure or to capillary forces. 

We shall find, later, that a fair presumption from 
Andrews' investigations would be that, in air and the 
majority of gases, pv should increase (of course very 
slightly) with diminution of pressure from one atmos- 
phere downwards; while (possibly) hydrogen may give 



COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS. 181 

values of pv diminishing to a minimum, and then in- 
creasing as the pressure is still further reduced. 

204. Passing next to the compressibility of vapours, it 
would appear natural that we should specially consider 
aqueous vapour, which is constantly present in the atmos- 
phere as superheated, sometimes even as saturated, steam. 
And we have for it the splendid collection of experimental 
results obtained by Regnault. But the critical point of 
water-substance is considerably higher than the range of 
temperature in Eegnault's work ; so that we will deal 
chiefly with carbonic acid, for which we have Andrews' 
data both above and below its critical point, and which 
may be taken as affording a fair example of the chief 
features of the subject. 

205. Without further preface we give Andrews' dia- 
gram, which will be easily intelligible after what has been 
said in 88. It shows, in fact, how the figure in that 
section, which is drawn from Boyle's Law, is modified in 
the case of a true gas, and of a true vapour, each within 
a few degrees of the critical temperature. 

[To save space, a portion of the lower part of the dia- 
gram (containing the axis of volumes) is cut away, so that 
pressures, as shown, begin from about 47 atmospheres. 
The dotted air-curves are rectangular hyperbolas, as in 
88, but the (unexhibited) axis of volumes is their hori- 
zontal asymptote.] 

The critical temperature of carbonic acid was given by 
Andrews as about 30 '9 C., so that the isothermals indi- 
cated by full lines in the figure, and marked 13 '1 and 21*5 
respectively, belong to vapour, or liquid, or vapour in pres- 
ence of liquid, the others to gas. [The true critical point is 
a little higher (about 31 *3). There was a trace of air, some 
l/500th of the whole, in the gas operated on by Andrews.] 




FIG. 20. 



COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS. 183 



Let us study, with Andrews' data, the values of the 
product j)v for the isothermal of 13'l C. The following 
table is formed precisely on the same principle as that of 
198 for the isothermal of 35 '5 C. 

CARBONIC ACID (VAPOUR AND LIQUID) AT 13-1 C. 



Recip. of Vol. Recip. of Vol. of 
of Air. 



47'5 

4876 
48-89 
49-0 
49-08 

50-15 
50-38 
54-56 
75-61 
90-43 



Carbonic Acid. 
76-16 
80-43 
80-90 
105-9 
142-0 

462-9 
471-5 
480-4 
500-7 
510-7 



pv. for Carb. Acid. 

653 
606 
600 
462 
345 



108 
106 
113 
151 
196 



206. Near to 49 atmospheres liquefaction commences, 
the vapour being condensed to -^-st of its volume at one 
atmosphere, and we see that an exceedingly small increase 
of pressure produces a marked change of volume. Had 
it been possible to free the carbonic acid perfectly from 
air, no additional pressure would have been required till 
the whole was liquid, at about ^^d of its original volume. 
The numbers pv diminish, as in the case of air (but much 
more rapidly), till the liquefaction begins : then they 
ought to diminish exactly as the volume diminishes (the 
pressure being constant) till complete liquefaction : after 
which, of course, they begin to rise rapidly, as it is now a 
liquid which is being compressed. 

We need not give the experimental numbers for the 
isothermal of 21 -5 C. ; but the cut shows that the stages 
of the operation were much the same, only that the pres- 



184 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

sure had to be raised over 60 atmospheres before liquefac- 
tion began, and liquefaction was complete before the 
volume had been reduced so far as at the lower tempera- 
ture. Thus the range of volume in which the tube was 
visibly occupied partly by liquid, partly by saturated 
vapour, and therefore (but for the trace of air) necessarily 
at constant pressure, was shortened at each end. The 
dotted line in the lower part of the figure, introduced by 
Clerk-Maxwell, bounds the region in which we can have 
the liquid in equilibrium with its vapour. This region 
terminates at the critical isothermal, for above that there 
can be neither vapour nor liquid. 

But the properties of the gas, above the critical point, 
maintain at any particular volume a certain analogy to 
those of the vapour or liquid below it. For volumes 
somewhat above the critical volume (0*0042) the gas has 
properties analogous to the superheated vapour, i.e. pv 
diminishes with increase of pressure. For volumes some- 
what under the critical volume its properties are analogous 
rather to those of the liquid, and pv increases with increase 
of pressure. Thus there is in each isothermal of the gas 
a particular pressure, for which pv is a minimum. This 
feature of the isothermal becomes less marked as the 
temperature is raised. [This, however, has been already 
exhibited more fully on Amagat's diagram, p. 1 77.] We 
might introduce a continuation, beyond the critical point, 
of the left-hand portion of the dotted curve, which should 
pass through the points on each isothermal at which pv is 
a minimum. This line would divide the wholly gaseous 
region into two parts ; that to its right, in which the gas 
has properties somewhat resembling those of superheated 
vapour ; to the left, that in which its properties resemble 
rather those of a liquid. 



COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS. 185 

An ingenious suggestion of J. Thomson substitutes for 
the horizontal part (liquid in presence of vapour) of 
Andrews' curves (p. 181) the continuous curve shown (by 
dashes) on the isothermal of 21'5 C. The middle portion 
of this curve (where pressure and volume increase to- 
gether) is physically unstable, but the other parts can be, 
to some extent, realised. The subject properly belongs 
to Heat. It is known that liquids may, in certain cases, 
be raised considerably above their boiling points without 
boiling; and Aitken ( 291) has proved that a nucleus of 
some kind is necessary for the condensation even of super- 
saturated vapour. The first of these phenomena may 
account for a portion of the new part of the curve near 
the liquid region, the second for that near the vapour 
region. The rest, belonging to an essentially unstable 
condition, cannot be realised experimentally. 

The apparently anomalous behaviour of hydrogen may 
perhaps be traced to the fact that, at ordinary temper- 
atures and pressures, it is in that region of its gaseous 
state which has more analogy with the liquid than with 
the vaporous state. Thus it is possible that if hydrogen 
be examined at sufficiently low pressure, and temperature 
not far above its critical point, it also will show a mini- 
muni value of pv ( 203). 

207. The reduction of various gaseous bodies to the 
liquid form was one of the earliest pieces of original work 
done by Faraday. Some of them he liquefied by cooling 
alone, many others by pressure alone ; and he pointed out 
that, in all probability, every gas could be liquefied by 
the combined influences of cooling and pressure, provided 
these could be carried far enough. 

Thilorier prepared large quantities of liquid carbonic 
acid, and took advantage of the cooling produced by its 



186 PROPERTIES OK MATTER. 

rapid evaporation, at ordinary pressures, to reduce it to 
the solid state. 

Cagniard de la Tour succeeded in completely evaporating 
various liquids (including ether, and even water) in closed 
tubes, which they half-filled while in the liquid state. 

It was Andrews' work, however, which first cleared up 
the subject, and, as an early consequence of it, several of 
those gases which had resisted all attempts to liquefy 
them were, at the end of 1877, shown to be capable of 
liquefaction by the production of a momentary mist on 
sudden adiabatic expansion from a pressure of several 
hundred atmospheres to one. These important results 
were obtained by Pictet; and in the year 1883 Wrob- 
lewski and Olzevvski succeeded in getting oxygen, nitrogen, 
&c., in the static condition. 

More recently, Dewar has made a careful study of the 
remarkable properties of air, oxygen, and nitrogen : 
obtained in large quantities in the liquid state. 

In 1898 he succeeded in getting liquid hydrogen in 
the static condition, and by evaporation in vacua has got 
it recently in the solid condition. 

Van der Waals, Clausius, Sarrau, and others, working 
from various assumptions, have given formulas which 
accord somewhat closely with the observed phenomena, 
and with J. Thomson's suggested modification of the 
diagram. One of the simplest expressions of the kind 
(which takes the place of (1) of 191) is of the form 



Here C is as before, and A, a, /3 are parameters depending 
on the properties of the substance as well as on its 
temperature. The " critical point " is determined by the 



COMPRESSIBILITY OF GASES AND VAPOURS. 187 

condition that the three values of v, given by this equation, 
shall be equal. These formulae are based upon what is 
called the Virial equation, a result of pure dynamics, 
given by Clausius in 1870. This represents a relation of 
equality between the average values of the kinetic energy 
of a system, and of a certain function of the forces exerted 
between its parts ; which obtains whenever the motion is 
" stationary ". The part of this function which depends 
on the retaining walls is proportional to pv. Hence, 
when mutual action between the particles is left out of 
account, we have at once the equation of 191, C being 
proportional to the whole kinetic energy of the gas. 

But the full treatment of such matters belongs to 
Thermodynamics, and is not for a work like this. Nor 
have we anything here to do with the employment of 
these liquefied gases for the production of exceedingly low 
temperatures ; though, from the experimental point of 
view, this application promises to be (for the present at 
least) their most valuable property. 



CHAPTER X. 

COMPRESSION OF LIQUIDS. 

208. A GLIMPSE at the negative results of the early 
attempts to compress water was given in 98. The 
problem is a complicated one, because (at least in the best 
methods hitherto employed) the quantity really measured 
is the difference of compressibility of the liquid and the 
containing vessel. Hence it involves the compressibility 
of solids also : and this, as we shall find (231) is a very 
difficult problem indeed. Difficult as it is, it has to be 
encountered, for the compressibility of glass is by no means 
small in comparison with that of the greater number of 
liquids. The first to succeed in proving the com pressibility 
of water was Canton, 1 the value of whose work seems not 
to have been fully appreciated. His second paper, in fact, 
has dropped entirely out of notice. 

Noting the height at which mercury stood in the narrow 
tube of an apparatus like a large thermometer, immersed 
in water at 50 F., the end of the tube being drawn out to 
a fine point and open, he heated the bulb till the mercury 
filled the whole, and then hermetically sealed the tip of 
the tube. When the mercury was cooled down to 50 F. 
it was found to have risen in the capillary tube. This 
was due partly to expansion of mercury, released from the 
1 Phil. Trans., 1762, 



COMPRESSION OF LIQUIDS. 189 

pressure of the atmosphere, partly to the compression of 
the bulb, due to one atmosphere of external pressure. 
Then he filled the same apparatus with water, performed 
exactly the same operations, and obtained a notably larger 
result. This, of course, proves that water (if not also 
mercury) expands when the pressure of the atmosphere is 
removed from it. 

To get rid of the effect of unbalanced external pressure, 
and thus (as he thought) to measure the full amount of 
expansion, he placed his apparatus (with its end open) in 
the receiver of an air-pump. He could also place it in a 
glass vessel, in which the air was compressed to two 
atmospheres. He observed that, on the relief of pressure, 
the water rose in the stem, while on increase of pressure 
it fell. He gives the fractional change of volume per 
atmosphere, at 50 F. (10 C.), as 1/21740 or 0-000046. 
He applied no correction for the compressibility of glass, 
giving the completely fallacious (212) reason that he had 
obtained exactly the same results from a thick bulb and 
from a thin one. [This, however, proves the accuracy of 
his experiments.] His result, considering its date, is 
wonderfully near the truth. 

209. In a second paper, 1 published a couple of years 
later, Canton made some specially notable additions to our 
knowledge. For he says, referring to his first paper : 
" By similar experiments made since, it appears that water 
has the remarkable property of being more compressible in 
winter than in summer, which is contrary to what I have 
observed both in spirits of wine and in oil of olives ; these 
fluids are (as one would expect water to be) more com- 
pressible when expanded by heat, and less so when con- 
tracted by cold." 

1 Phil Trans., 1764, vol. liv. 261. 



190 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

By repeated observations, at " opposite " seasons of the 
year, he found that the effect of the " mean weight of the 
atmosphere " was, in millionths of the whole volume 

At 34 F. At 64 F. 

Water 49 44 

Spirit of Wine 60 71 

He also gives a table of compressibilities in millionths of 
the volume, per atmosphere of 2 9 '5 inches, and of specific 
gravities ; for different liquids, at 50 F. ; as follows : 

Compressibility. Spec. Gravity. 
Spirit of Wine ... 66 846 

Oil of Olives . . 48 918 

Rain Water . . 46 1000 

Sea Water . 40 1028 

Mercury . 3 13595 

and he observes that the compressions are not " in the 
inverse ratio of the densities, as might be supposed." 

He calculates from the result for sea water that two 
miles of such water are reduced in depth by 69 feet 2 
inches ; the actual compression at that depth being 1 3 in 
1000. This, of course, assumes that the compressibility 
is the same at all pressures, which, as we shall see 
immediately, is by no means the case. 

210. Perkins, in 1820, made a set of experiments on 
the apparent compressibility of water in glass, of a some- 
what rude kind; but in 1826 1 he gave some valuable 
determinations, unfortunately defective because of the 
inadequate measure of the pressure unit. Thus he did 
not give accurate values of the compression, but he intro- 
duced us to a higher problem : how the compressibility 
depends upon the amount of pressure. Perkins' results 

1 " On the Progressive Compression of Water by high Degrees of 
Force." Phil. Trans. 



COMPKESSION OF LIQUIDS. 191 

are all for 50 F. (10 C.), and are given in figures, as well 
as in a carefully-executed diagram plotted by the graphic 
method. His measurement of pressures depended upon an 
accurate knowledge of the section of a plunger : an 
exceedingly precarious method : and he estimated an 
atmosphere at 14 Ibs. weight only per square inch. It is 
not easy to make out his real unit, especially as we know 
nothing about the glass he used, but it seems to have been 
about 1*5 times too great ; i.e. when he speaks of the effect 
of 1000 atmospheres he was probably applying somewhere 
about 1500. Hence it is not easy to deduce from his data 
anything of value as to the amount of compression. But 
the novel point, which he made out clearly, is that (at 10 
C.) the compressibility of water decreases, quickly at first, 
afterwards more slowly, as the pressure is raised. We 
obtain from Perkins' diagram the following roughly 
approximate results, in which we have made no attempt 
to rectify his pressure unit : 

Pressure Compression of Water Average Com- True Com - 

in in Millionths of pressibility per pressibility per 

Atmospheres. Orig. Vol. Atmosphere. Atmosphere. 

150 10,000 66 51 

300 17,500 58 48 

900 43,400 48 39 

and from a further isolated statement we obtain 

2,000 83,300 42 

In this paper Perkins mentions a remarkable experi- 
mental result he had obtained : viz. the solidification of 
acetic acid by pressure. Amagat has recently succeeded 
in solidifying tetrachloride of carbon by pressure. 1 

211. Orsted's improvement in the experimental method 
(1822) consisted chiefly in applying pressure, as in Canton's 
1 Comptes Rendus, 1887. 



192 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

process, in such a way that the effects of pressures up to 
40 or 50 atmospheres can be read off at every stage of the 
experiment. 

The liquid operated on fills the bulb and the greater 
part of the stem of the apparatus (called a Piezometer}, 
and is separated by mercury contained 
in a U tube from the water-contents of 
a strong glass cylinder, in which the 
pressure is produced by forcibly screw- 
ing in a piston or plug. As in Canton's 
apparatus, the stem of the piezometer is 
carefully calibrated and divided into parts 
corresponding to equal volumes, and the 
cubic content of the bulb is determined. 
Hence the ratio of the content of one 
division of the tube to the whole content 
of bulb and stem is found. 

When pressure is applied, the mercury 
is seen to ascend in the stem to an 
amount nearly in proportion to the 
pressure. The pressure is roughly cal- 
culated (by Boyle's law) from the ob- 
served change of volume of air contained 
in a very uniform tube, closed at the 
FIG. 21. t^ anc j immersed along with the 

piezometer, in the water of the compression vessel. 

The only serious defect of this apparatus, besides the 
inadequate measurement of pressure, is the limitation of 
the pressure to what the exterior vessel can resist, some 
50 or 60 atmospheres only. When higher pressures are 
to be applied, iron or steel must be used for the compres- 
sion vessel ; and then the piezometer must be made, in 
some way, to record the change of volume of its contents. 




COMPKESSION OF LIQUIDS. 193 

The most common device is to have (as in a maximum 
thermometer) a little index resting on the mercury and 
prevented, by attached hairs, from moving too freely. 
It contains a small piece of iron, so that it may be adjusted 
from without by a magnet. This method is liable to the 
objection that, unless the pressure is relieved very 
cautiously, the index may be displaced by the current of 
liquid : so that the results are sometimes a little too small. 
Cailletet gilt the inside of the stem, and the eating away 
of the film of gold showed the height to which the mercury 
had risen. An exceedingly thin film of silver, deposited 
by sugar of milk, has also been employed. But all such 
devices are very troublesome, for the compression vessel 
has to be opened after every experiment. Hence Tait 1 
suggested the sealing of a number of fine platinum wires 
into the stem of the piezometer, and by an obvious 
electrical method detecting the instant at which the 
mercury reaches one of them. Thus, instead of measuring 
the compression produced by a given pressure, we measure 
the pressure necessary to produce an assigned compression. 
This method was employed by Amagat in his later experi- 
ments ( 201, 217), and he says of it elle ne laisse reelle- 
mentpresque rien a desirer. 

212. Orsted verified Canton's result that the compressi- 
bility of water diminishes with rise of temperature, and 
suspected that the rate of diminution becomes less as the 
temperature is further raised; but he did not obtain 
Perkins* result. In fact he states that at any one tempera- 
ture the compression is the same, per atmosphere, up to 
70 atmospheress. 

Orsted, and too many who have followed him, held the 
opinion that, if the walls of the piezometer were very 
'* Proc. R.S.E., 1884. 

N 



194 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

thin, its internal volume would suffer no perceptible 
change under equal interior and exterior pressures. That 
this (like the somewhat similar notion of Canton) is a 
fallacy, we see at once from the consideration of the effect 
of hydrostatic pressure on a solid ( 176). If we suppose 
the solid to be divided into an infinite number of equal 
cubes, these would be changed into equal but smaller 
cubes, in consequence of compression. The strained and 
the unstrained vessel may therefore be compared to two 
vaults of brickwork, similar in every respect as to number 
and position of bricks, but such that the bricks in the one 
are all less in the same ratio than those in the other. 
From this point of view it is clear that the interior content 
of the bulb is diminished just as if it had, itself, been a 
solid sphere of glass. 

Thus the numbers obtained from the piezometer must 
all be corrected by adding the compression of glass under 
the same pressure. 

Another fallacy much akin to this, one which is still 
to be found in many books, is the notion that by filling 
the bulb of the piezometer partly with glass, partly with 
water, and making a second set of experiments, we shall 
be able to obtain a second relation between the compressi- 
bilities of glass and of water; and that, therefore, we 
shall be able to calculate the value of each by piezometer 
experiments alone. What we have said above shows 
that this process comes merely to using a piezometer 
with a smaller internal capacity ; and therefore gives no 
new information. 

If we had a substance of known compressibility, say for 
instance it were incompressible, and were partly to fill the 
cavity of the piezometer with this, we should be able to 
get the second relation above spoken of. 



COMPRESSION OF LIQUIDS. 195 

In fact the piezometer gives differences of compressibility 
only ; so that, for absolute determinations with it, we 
must have one substance whose compressibility is known 
by some other method. 

When very great pressures are applied, the correction 
of the apparent compressibility is not quite so simple. If 
e be the true compressibility of the liquid, that of the 
piezometer, the ordinary formula is 
e = e + m/p 

where ra is the fractional diminution of volume. It is 
easy to see, however, that the exact relation is 



213. Regnault's l apparatus, though managed by a 
master-hand, was by no means faultless in principle. For 
pressure was applied alternately to the outside and to the 
inside of his piezometer, and then simultaneously to both. 

There are great objections to the employment of 
external or internal pressure alone, at least in such deli- 
cate inquiries as these. For, unless a number of almost 
unrealisable conditions are satisfied by the apparatus, the 
theoretical methods (which must be employed in deducing 
the results) are not strictly applicable. They are all 
necessarily founded on some such suppositions as that the 
bulbs are perfectly cylindrical, or spherical, and that the 
thickness of the walls and the elastic coefficients of the 
material are exactly the same throughout. These require- 
ments can, at best, be only approximately fulfilled ; and 
their non-fulfilment may (in consequence of the largeness 
of the effects on the apparatus, compared with that on its 
contents) entail errors of the same order as the whole com- 
pression to be measured. Jamin has tried to avoid this 
$e I'Acad. des Sciences, 1847. 



196 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

difficulty by measuring directly the increase of (external) 
volume, when a bulb is subjected to internal pressure ; 
but, even with this addition to the apparatus, we have still 
to trust too much to the accuracy of the assumptions on 
which the theoretical calculations are based. 

Finding that he could not obtain good results with glass 
vessels, Eegnault used spherical bulbs of brass and of 
copper. With these he obtained, for the compressibility 
of water, the value 

0*000048, per atmosphere 

for pressures from one to ten atmospheres. The tempera- 
ture is, unfortunately, not specially stated. 

214. Grassi, 1 working with Regnault's apparatus, made 
a number of determinations of compressibility of different 
liquids, all for small ranges of pressure. 

He verified Canton's specially interesting result, viz. 
that water, instead of being (like the other substances, 
ether, alcohol, chloroform, etc., on which he experimented) 
more compressible at higher temperatures, becomes less 
compressible. Here are a few of his numbers. 



Texture 0. 

0*0 0-0000503 

1'5 515 

4'0 499 

10'8 480 

18'0 462 

25'0 455 

34'5 453 

53'0 441 

These numbers, when exhibited graphically, show 

irregularities too great to be represented by any simple 

formula. We now know them to be in many cases very 
1 Ann. de Chimie, xxxi., 1851. 



COMPRESSION OF LIQUIDS. 197 

far from the truth, but we give them, not at all because 
they are (even yet) frequently referred to as authoritative, 
but because some important reductions of physical data 
have been based upon them ; so that it is well to furnish 
the means of correcting such reductions. 

Grassi assigns, for sea-water at 17'5 C., 0'94 of the 
compressibility of pure water, and gives 0*00000295 per 
atmosphere as the compressibility of mercury. But he 
asserts that alcohol, chloroform, and ether have their 
average compressibility, from one to eight or nine atmos- 
pheres, at ordinary temperatures, considerably greater 
than the compressibility for one atmosphere. As this 
result was shown by Amagat to be erroneous, little con- 
fidence can be placed in any of Grassi's determinations. 

Amagat 1 gave, among others, the following numbers 
for ether : 

Pressure in Average Compression 

Temperature C. Atmospheres. per Atmosphere. 

13-7 11 0-000168 

13'7 33 0-000152 

100 11 0-000560 

100 33 0-000474 

Thus the diminution of compressibility with increase of 
pressure is always considerable, and it is more marked 
the higher the temperature. 

215. A very complete series of determinations of the 
compressibility of water (for a few atmospheres of 
pressure only), through the whole range of temperature 
from C. to 100 C., has recently been made by Pag- 
liani and Yincentini. 2 Unfortunately, in their experi- 
ments pressure was applied to the inside only of the 

l Ann. de Chimie, 1877. 

2 Sulla Compressibititd dei Liquidi, Torino, 1884. 



198 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

piezometer, so that their indicated results have to be 
diminished by from 40 to 50 per cent. The effects of 
heat on the elasticity of glass are, however, carefully 
determined, a matter of absolute necessity when so large 
a range of temperature is involved. But in these experi- 
ments one datum (the compressibility of water at C.) 
has been assumed from Grassi. The results show that 
the maximum of compressibility, indicated by Grassi as 
lying between C. and 4 C., does not exist. The 
following are a few of the numbers, which show a tempera- 
ture effect much larger than that obtained by Grassi : 

Compressibility 
Temperature C. of water. 

0'0 0-0000503 

2'4 496 

15'9 450 

49'3 403 

61'0 389 

66'2 389 

77 '4 398 

99'2 409 

Thus, about 63 C. water appears to have its minimum 
compressibility. The existence of a minimum does seem 
to be proved, but the remarks above show that its position 
on the temperature scale is somewhat uncertain. 

216. Tait 1 has given the following determinations of 
the average compressibility of cistern water, for pressures 
up to 450 atmospheres, and temperature from to 15 C. 
The compressibility of the glass of the piezometer was 
found by direct experiment ( 232) to be 0'0000026. 
The hair-index (, 211) was employed in the piezometer, 
so that the results were given as probably somewhat too 
small. 

1 Phys. Chem. Chall. Exp., vol. ii. part iv., 1888. 



COMPRESSION OF LIQUIDS. 199 

COMPRESSIBILITY OP CISTERN WATER. 

Pressure in 
Atmospheres. Avera * e Compressibility 

1 to 2 10 ~ 7 (520 -3 '55* + 03 2 ) 

1 to 153 504 3-60 0'04 

1 to 306 490 3'65 0'05 

1 to 458 478 370 06 

where t is temperature Centigrade. 

The experiments were confined to the three last ranges, 
so that the data in the first line were obtained by extra- 
polation. They agree, however, fairly well with two 
isolated results given by Buchanan, 1 viz. : 

0-0000516 at 2 '5, and 0'0000483 at 12'5 C., 
and they would have agreed almost precisely with the 
results of Pagliani and Vincentini (215) had these ex- 
perimenters taken, as their sole datum from Grassi, the 
compressibility at 1'5 instead of that at C. 

The temperature of minimum compressibility for 1 
atmosphere appears to be about 60 C., and is lowered by 
increase of pressure. 

All the numbers in the above table are fairly repre- 
sented by the approximate formula. 

Q.Q01863f U P 
3Q + P \ 400 10,000, 

Here the unit for P is 152 -3 atmospheres, or one ton- 
weight per square inch. 

[If we take an atmosphere, instead of a ton-weight per 
square inch, as our unit ; this gives for the average com- 
pressibility of water at C., for the first p atmospheres, 

the expression 

0-284 
5483 +p ' 

1 Trans. R.S.E., 1880. 



200 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

The constants in this formula were given as probably 
too small. Amagat's recent results ( 217) show that 
they should each be increased by a little more than 4 per 
cent, only.] 

The corresponding formula for sea-water is 



0-OQ179/ t t* \ 
38 + PV 150 10, 000 / 



The results have been put in the above form for the 
sake of comparison with the following expression for the 
compressibility, at C., of solutions of common salt, 
viz.: 

0-00186 



36 + s + P 

In this formula s represents the mass of salt dissolved 
in 100 of water. It appears, from recent experiments, 
that a somewhat similar result is given by aqueous solu- 
tions of other salts, the addition to the denominator of 
the fraction being proportional (not equal) to the mass of 
salt in 100 of water. 1 

Tait gives the average compressibility of mercury for 
pressures up to 450 atmospheres as about 0*0000036. 
This is probably a little too small, as Amagat 2 makes it 
0-0000039 for the first 50 atmospheres. 

217. The final results of Amagat's splendid researches 
on the compressibility of liquids at enormous pressures, 
which exceed in accuracy as well as in extent all previous 
work, have recently been published. 3 The extremely 
interesting figure opposite gives some idea of their nature 
and importance. It represents the isothermals of water 

1 Proc. E.S.E., June 5, 1893. 2 Comptes JRendits, 1889. 
8 Ann. de Chimie, 1893. 



COMPRESSION OF LIQUIDS. 201 

and of sulphuric ether, up to pressures of 3000 atmos- 
pheres, and for temperatures from to 50 C. 




FIG. 22. 



From a figure on so small a scale general notions only 
can be derived. But we see clearly through how small 
a range of pressures and temperatures the peculiarities 
connected with the maximum density point of water re- 



202 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

main sensible. The quasi-hyperbolic form of the iso- 
thermals enables us to make approximate estimates of 
the utmost compression which these two liquids would 
suffer under unlimited pressure. More precise informa- 
tion is contained in the following numerical data. 

VOLUMES OF WATER AND OF SULPHURIC ETHER UNDER 
GREAT PRESSURES. 

Water. Sulphuric Ether. 



Atmospheres. 


0C. 


10'l 





20 '2 


1 


1-00000 


1 00015 


1-0000 


1-0320 


500 


97630 


97780 


9465 


9674 


1000 


95600 


95850 


9130 


9295 


1500 


93890 


94185 


8885 


9020 


2000 


92370 


92710 


8684 


8805 


2500 


91020 


91370 


8522 


8631 


3000 


89830 


90185 


8387 


8485 



A convenient and fairly close approximation, deduced 
from these numbers, gives the following expressions for 
the average compressibility of water from 1 to p atmos 

pheres : 

0-295 



At C. 
10 C. 



5725+2? 

0-313 
6550+^ 



This would indicate that water at C. cannot be 
reduced to less than about 0'7 of its original volume by 
any pressure, however great. 

Amagat's data for ether give the corresponding for- 
mulae. 



20 -- 
2086 +p 



COMPRESSION OF LIQUIDS. 203 

It is observed that formulae like these, if they agree 
exactly with the data for extreme and mid-range of 
pressures, err slightly in defect for pressures lower than 
the average, and in excess for those higher ( 260). 

The apparatus which gave the magnificent results tabu- 
lated above was, of course, specially adapted to the effects 
of extreme pressures, and was therefore not qualified to 
give very precise values for moderate pressures. 

218. From the results of Andrews already given ( 205) 
we find the following roughly approximate values of the 

COMPRESSIBILITY OF LIQUID CARBONIC ACID AT 13-1 C. 

Pressure in True Compressibility 

Atmospheres. per Atmosphere. 

50 0-0059 

60 0-00174 

70 0-00096 

80 0-00066 

90 0-00044 

showing very great, but very rapidly decreasing, com- 
pressibility. As already explained, Andrews has pointed 
out that part of this, especially for the lower pressures 
in the table, is due to the trace of air which, in spite of 
every precaution, was associated with the carbonic acid. 

219. It has long been known that, when the Torricellian 
experiment is performed, the mercury will sometimes not 
descend until the tube is sharply tapped, even if the 
column be 4 or 5 feet in length, instead of being little 
more than the 30 inches which are supported by the 
atmospheric pressure. In such a case the portion of the 
column which stands above the barometric height must 
be in a state of hydrostatic tension. And, as in the case 
of solids, ( 177) we conclude that its volume is increased 



204 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

to the same extent as it would have been diminished by 
an equal hydrostatic pressure. 

A very interesting experiment bearing on this subject 
was made by Berthelot. 1 A strong glass tube, sealed at 
one end and drawn out very fine at the other, was filled 
to a definite mark with water. By immersing the whole 
in warm water the contents were made to expand nearly 
to the point, which was then hermetically sealed. A 
very slight additional heating, slowly and cautiously 
applied, caused the water in time to dissolve the small 
remaining bubble of air, so that the tube was absolutely 
full of liquid. When slowly cooled to its original temper- 
ature it remained full of water. By the help of the mark 
(checked if necessary by calculation from the temperature 
of the warm water) the increase of volume could be 
estimated, and thence the tension to which the water 
was exposed. In this way pure water was found capable 
of bearing some fifty atmospheres of tension, while eau 
sucree bore nearly one hundred. It is clear that the 
adhesion of the water to the glass is an indispensable 
circumstance in this experiment. And as the equilibrium 
is essentially unstable, throughout the whole contents, it 
is remarkable that so large an effect can be obtained : 
though, of course, it is far below what might (theoretically 
at least) be supposed possible. 

1 Ann. de Chimie, xxx. 232 ; 1850. 



CHAPTER XI. 

COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OP SOLIDS. 

220. IN the two preceding chapters we had to deal with 
bodies practically homogeneous (except in the special case 
of vapour in presence of liquid) and perfectly isotropic ; 
bodies, moreover, which are devoid of elasticity of form, 
while possessing perfect elasticity of volume. Hence the 
determination of (apparent) compressibility for any definite 
substance of these kinds depended for its accuracy solely 
on the care and skill of the experimenter, and on the 
adequacy of the process and the apparatus employed. 

When we deal with solids the circumstances are very 
different. It is rarely the case that we meet with a solid 
which is more than approximately homogeneous. Some 
natural crystals, such as fluor spar, Iceland spar, etc., are 
probably very nearly homogeneous ; so are metals such as 
gold, silver, lead, etc., when melted and allowed to cool 
very slowly. To produce homogeneous glass (especially 
in large discs, for the object-glasses of achromatic tele- 
scopes) is one of the most difficult of practical problems. 
On the other hand, crystalline bodies are essentially non- 
isotropic ; so is every substance, crystalline or not, which 
shows " cleavage." 

And further, very small traces of admixture or impurity 
often produce large effects on the elastic, as well as on 
the thermal and electric, qualities of a solid body. Think, 
for instance, of the differences between various kinds of 
iron and steel, or of the purposely added impurities in 



206 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

the gold and silver used for coinage. Very slight changes, 
in the manipulation by which wires or rods are drawn 
from the same material, may make large differences in 
their final state : differences by no means entirely to be 
.got rid of by heating and annealing, etc. The whole 
question of " temper " is still in a purely empirical state. 
Besides, we must remember that every solid has its limits 
of elasticity, to which attention must be carefully paid. 
Thus we can give only general or average statements as 
to the amount of compressibility or rigidity of any solid, 
in spite of the labour which Wertheim and many others 
have bestowed on the subject. 

221. In an elementary work we cannot deal, even 
partially, with the elastic properties of non-isotropic 
bodies. The necessary mathematical basis of the investi- 
gation, though it has been marvellously simplified, is 
quite beyond any but advanced students. And the 
experimental study of the problem has been carried out 
for isolated cases only. Hence we limit ourselves, except 
in a few special instances, to the consideration of homo- 
geneous, isotropic, solids. 

On the other hand, the compression or distortion 
produced in a solid by any ordinary stress is usually very 
small. This consideration tends to simplify our work ; for, 
as a rule, small distortions maybe regarded as strictly super- 
posable. Thus we may calculate, independently, the effects 
of each of the simple stresses to which a solid is subjected. 

Our warrant for this must of course be obtained 
experimentally. It was first given by Hooke. 

In 1676 1 he published the following as one of "a 
decimate of the centesme of the Inventions, etc." 

1 A Description of Helioscopes, &e. t made by Robert HooTce, 
Postscript, p. 31. 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 207 

" 3. The trite TJieory of Elasticity or Springiness, and a 
particular Explication thereof in several Subjects in which 
it is to be found : And the way of computing the velocity 
of Bodies moved by them, ceiiinossstttm." 

The key to this anagram was given by Hooke himself 
in 1678, 1 in the words : 

" About two years since I printed this Theory in an 
Anagram at the end of my Book of the descriptions of 
Helioscopes, viz. ceiiinosssttuu, id est, Ut tensio sic vis ; 
That is, The Power of any Spring is in the same propor- 
tion with the tension thereof .- That is, if one power 
stretch or bend it one space, two will bend it two, and three 
will bend it three, and so forward. Now as the Theory 
is very short, so the way of trying it is very easie." 

He then shows how to prove the law in various ways : 
with a spiral spring drawn out ; a watch spring made 
to coil or uncoil ; a long wire suspended vertically and 
stretched ; and a wooden beam fixed (at one end) in a 
horizontal position, and loaded. 

The above extracts sufficiently show in what sense 
Hooke intended the words Tensio and Vis to be under- 
stood : and his law is now usually stated in the (some- 
what amplified) form, called HOOKE'S LAW, 

Distortion is proportional to the distorting Fon-' 
or, still more definitely, 

Strain is proportional to Stress. 

In the latter form we have made anticipatory use of it in 
Chap. VIII. and elsewhere. 

1 Lectures de Potentia Restitutiva, or of Spring, p. [1], This is 
a very curious pamphlet, containing some remarkably close antici- 
pations of modern theories, especially Synchronism and its results, 
and the Kinetic Theory of Gases. The first is foreign to our 
present subject, the second will be considered later ( 322). 



208 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

222. A very general proof of the accuracy of this law 
is easily to be obtained in the case of bodies which can 
be made to produce a musical sound : a tuning-fork, for 
instance. For, if the pitch of the note (i.e. the number 
of vibrations per second) do not alter as the sound grows 
fainter, the vibrations must be isochronous, and the 
elastic resilience therefore proportional to the distortion. 
(See 72.) 

223. The ordinary experimental illustrations of Hooke's 
Law are given, very much as he originally gave them, 
by:- 

1. A rod or wire, fixed vertically and stretched by 
appended weights ; or a rod or column compressed by 
weights laid on its upper end. 

2. A wire stretched horizontally and extended by 
weights suspended at its middle point. 

3. A bar or plank fixed horizontally at one end and 
loaded with weights at the other. 

4. A plank with its ends resting on trestles and loaded 
at the middle. 

5. A spiral spring, forming a helix of small step, 
compressed or extended by weights. 

6. A wire or rod, fixed at one end and twisted at the 
other. 

The mere mention of these methods is sufficient, with- 
out further illustration, to suggest the means by which 
the requisite measurements can be carried out. They 
will be considered in detail, but not in the above order. 

In all these cases experiment shows that (within 
certain limits, which will be afterwards discussed) the 
distortion is proportional to the distorting force. 

1 and 2 are mere varieties of one experiment. The 
same may be said of 3 and 4, which are examples of a 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 209 

somewhat more complex form. And 5 and 6, though at 
first sight very unlike, are practically one problem. 
Besides, they are of a simpler character than either of 
the other pairs, for they involve the coefficient of rigidity 
alone ; the others involve both coefficients. But 1 and 
2, on the other hand, are simpler than the rest, on a 
different account, viz. that they involve homogeneous strain. 
224. Young's Modulus, as it is called, is determined 
from the stretching of a rod or wire by appended weights. 
As defined by Young, its measure is the ratio, of the 
simple stress required to produce a small shortening or 
elongation of a rod of unit section, to the fractional 
change of length produced. Its value is expressed, as 
we see by 181, in terms of the rigidity and the resist- 
ance to compression, by the formula 
Qkn 



For bodies like india-rubber, in which 7c is large in 
comparison with n, its value is nearly 3n. Hence in 
pulling out an india-rubber band the change is almost 
entirely one of form (see again, 181) and therefore 
the area of a cross section is diminished in nearly the 
same proportion as that in which the band is lengthened. 

A piece of good cork suggests, though it does not 
realise, the conception of a solid in which n shall be very 
large in comparison with k ; and for such a body Young's 
modulus would be nearly 9/c. Since n is very large, 
there is little change of form ; so that traction or pressure, 
in any direction, would expand or contract a body of this 
kind nearly equally in all directions. In cork the effect 
is confined mainly to the dimension operated on. 

From such considerations we see that Young's modulus, 
though comparatively easy of measurement, is not the 





210 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

simple quantity which it at first appears to be ; and that, 
in fact, it may have the same numerical value in each of 
two hodies which differ widely from one another, alike 
in rigidity and in compressibility. 

225. The following table gives approximate values 
( 166) of Young's modulus for some common materials; 
the unit being 10 7 grammes' weight per square centi- 
met-ve : 

Qkn 
Young's modulus, ^ . Tenacity. 

Gold 86 0-27 

Silver . . 76 . . 0'3 

Copper (hard) .125 . . 0'4 

Copper (annealed) 110 . . 0'8 

Iron . . .180 . . 0'6 

Steel . .240 . . 0'8 

Oak 10 0-1 

Teak . . 17 . . 0-1 

Fir ... 12 .. 0-07 

Glass . 40 to 60 . . 0'06 

To convert these numbers (as they stand in the table) 
into the common reckoning of pounds' weight per square 
inch, it suffices to multiply them by about 142,000 instead 
of by 10 7 . To convert to C. G. S. units, i.e. dynes per 
square centimetre, multiply by 9 '81 x 10. 

226. A second column (in terms of the same units) 
has been added to the above table, to give an indication 
of the Tenacity of each of the materials specified. This 
means the utmost longitudinal stress which (when 
cautiously applied) a rod or wire can endure without 
rupture. It has no direct connection with Young's 
modulus, nor with either of the coefficients of elasticity, 
for a substance has usually to be strained far beyond its 
limits of elasticity before rupture takes place, and the 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 211 

dimensions of the cross section are also much reduced. 
The uncertainty of the amount of this quantity, even in 
different specimens taken from the same piece of matter, 
leads to our giving it usually to one significant figure 
only. 

227. Young's treatment of the subject of elasticity is 
one of the few really imperfect portions of his great 
work. 1 He gives the values of his modulus for water, 
mercury, air, etc. ! It is not easy to understand what 
he really meant by speaking of " the " modulus of 
elasticity : unless, as Lord Rayleigh suggests, he meant 
that which (whatever be, in each case, its real nature) 
is involved in ordinary sound waves, whether in air or 
along wires. Young's modulus is, no doubt, a quantity 
of great value in practical engineering : in many cases 
the only elastic datum required. Yet he speaks of 
rigidity, etc., in a way which is scarcely compatible with 
the idea of one modulus only. But the subject was in a 
state of great confusion till long after his time, mainly 
in consequence of an unwarranted conclusion (deduced 
by Navier and Poisson from a species of molecular 
theory) that there is a necessary numerical ratio between 
rigidity and resistance to compression. In fact, what 
was called Poisson's ratio, that of the lateral shrinking, 
to the longitudinal extension, of a bar or rod under 
tension, was supposed to be necessarily equal to 1/4. 
This gives ( 180)p = 4g, or 3& = 5ra. 

The erroneousness of this conclusion was first pointed 
out by Sir G. G. Stokes, 2 and his paper has put the whole 
subject in a new and clear light. We have already given, 
in 224 above, some of his illustrations, which show 

- 1 Lectures on Natural Philosophy, 1807. 
2 Camb. Phil. Trans., 1845. 



212 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

that there is no necessary ratio, or even relation, between 
n and k. 

De St Venant 1 has given complete solutions of a 
number of interesting cases, such as the torsion of prisms 
of different forms of cross-section, many of which are 
very valuable in practical applications. Lord Kelvin, 2 
besides giving the theory with extreme generality, has 
also specially developed the application of Thermo- 
dynamics 3 to the subject. 

In spite of Stokes' exposure of the inaccuracy of the 
so-called Vni-constant Theory, it has still determined 
partisans. These may profitably consult the following 
data, given by Amagat ; 4 though we quote them for their 
intrinsic value, not for the purpose of further " slaying 
the slain." 

ELASTIC CONSTANTS (MEAN VALUES) AT 12 C. 



Poisson's 


Compressibility 


Young's 


Ratio. 


per Atmosphere. 


Modulus. 


Glass 0-245 


0-00000220 


6,775 


Steel 0-268 


68 


20,395 


Copper 0-327 


86 


12,145 


Brass 0'327 


95 


10,851 


Lead 0'428 


276 


1,556 



The unit for Young's modulus, which was determined 
directly, is a kilogramme weight per square millimetre, 
so that the numbers in the last column must be divided 
by 100, to reduce them to the unit employed in the 
table of 225. 

The numbers in the first two columns are the means 
of closely accordant results derived, one set from the 

1 Mim. des Savans Strangers, 1855. See also Thomson and 
Tait's Nat. Phil., 699, etc. 2 Phil. Trans., 1854. 

3 Quarterly Math. Journal, 1855. 4 Comptes Rendus, 1889. 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 213 

change of contents of a cylinder under longitudinal 
traction ( 181), the other from the similar change under 
external pressure alone ( 183). Along with each of 
these data the value of Young's modulus, as given in the 
last column, was employed. 

228. We will now consider the pure Torsion of a 
cylindrical rod or wire, as employed, for instance, in the 
Cavendish experiment ( 153). 

This is a very simple problem if the cylinder be truly 
circular, and of perfectly homogeneous isotropic material. 
For it is clear from what follows that equal and opposite 
twisting couples, applied at its ends, will simply make 
successive transverse slices, of equal thickness, rotate 
about the axis each by the same amount less than the one 
before it. 

The length of the cylinder cannot increase under 
torsion, for a reversal of the couples (which is practically 
the same arrangement) would shorten it ( 177), and 
vice versa. Neither can its radius change, for exactly 
the same reason. Nor can a transverse section become 
curved at any part. Thus the volume remains unchanged, 
and therefore the coefficient of rigidity alone is involved. 

Consider a thin annular portion of the cylinder bounded 
by transverse sections at a very small distance, t, from 
one another, and by concentric 
cylinders of radii r, and r + 1. We 
may subdivide this into cubes, of 
side t, by planes through the axis, 
making angles tjr with one another. 

Let <p be the twist per unit 
length of the cylinder, t(p is the 
angle by which one of the parallel 
sections has rotated relatively to the other, and r.t^/t, or 




214 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

r<p, is the change of angle in each of the little cubes. 
Hence, if P be the tangential force per unit of area( 178) 

P=nr<p. 

The moment, about the axis, of the tangential force on 
the cube is therefore 



[Note here, for an ulterior purpose ( 235), that r 2 ^ 2 is 
the moment of inertia ( 132) of the area of the face of 
the cube about the axis.] 

But the number of cubes is 27rr/t, so that the whole 
moment is SJuwtyp. 

This is the couple required to twist a circular cylinder 
of radius r, and very small thickness t, through the angle 
(p per unit of length. 

To find the result for a solid cylinder of radius K, we 
must put dr for t, and integrate. The result is 



Hence the twist produced, per unit of length in a 
cylinder, is directly as the twisting couple ; inversely as 
the rigidity and as the fourth power of the radius. 

229. This suggests an obvious and direct experimental 
process for determining the rigidity of homogeneous 
isotropic substances. There are two difficulties, of a 
formidable character, in the way of its application : first, 
the obtaining a homogeneous isotropic material, and 
secondly, the making it into a circular cylinder. It is 
clear that very small irregularities of form, or errors in 
the estimate of the radius, may give rise to large errors 
in the calculation of the rigidity, since the fourth power 
of the radius is directly involved in the calculations. 
And it is probable that the mode of manufacture of the 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY Ott SOLIDS. 215 



cylinder (especially if it be drawn, 49) may render its 
otherwise isotropic material markedly non - isotropic. 
Hence the following numbers are given as mere approxi- 
mations. The unit is, again, 10 7 grammes' weight per 
square centimetre ( 225). 



APPROXIMATE RIGIDITY (n). 



Glass 

Brass 

Iron (wrought) 

Iron (cast) 

Steel 

Copper 



15 to 25 
35 

79 

55 

85 

45 to 50 



These values are for ordinary temperatures. As the tem- 
perature is raised, the rigidity is found steadily to diminish. 

230. When a spiral spring is drawn out, it is pretty 
clear to every one that there is unbending, for the curv- 
ature becomes less as the helix is lengthened. And 





Fio/25. 



the following simple experiment shows that this flexure 
is accompanied by torsion. Coil up a strip of sheet 



216 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

india-rubber, as in the cut, and pull out the inner end. 
It assumes the form sketched. The portion pulled out 
straight is twisted merely ; the coiled part is merely 
bent ; the intermediate portion is partly bent and partly 
twisted. Every coil pulled out gives one complete turn 
of twist. If we make kinks on the strip, as in fig. 25, 
then, on pulling out the first, we find two complete turns 
of twist, but on pulling out the second there is no twist, 
one of the kinks giving a right-handed, the other a left- 
handed, complete turn of twist. 1 

When the spring is very flat, i.e. has a very small 
step, the principal effect of a moderate extension is mere 
torsion ; and the investigation is of a character precisely 
the same as that in the preceding section. The some- 
what more complex combination, of torsion and flexure 
simultaneously, will be adverted to later. ( 237.) 

231. Theoretically speaking, we can of course deduce 
the resistance to compression from the (known) values of 
the rigidity and of Young's modulus ; and it is in this way 
that most of the data connected with the subject have 
been obtained. But especially in cases where Young's 
modulus is not very far from threefold the rigidity (as, 
for instance, in india-rubber), the inevitable errors in the 
determination of these might lead to enormously greater 
errors in the calculated value of k. 

The method which was incidentally employed by 
Regnault, in his measurements of the compressibility 
of liquids, consisted in applying pressure externally, 
internally, and externally and internally, to a species 
of piezometer containing water. The results of 183 
show that (supposing it cylindrical, and unit pressure 
applied) its internal volume must have been altered, in 
1 Knots. Trans. R.S.E., 1877. 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 217 

these three cases respectively, by the following fractions 
of its whole amount: 




The algebraic sum of the two first is of course equal 
to the third. But the quantities measured in the two 
latter cases were both less than those stated above by the 
fractional change of volume of the water. The relation, 
therefore, still holds, and furnishes a test of the accuracy 
of the experiments. But it reduces the number of inde- 
pendent equations to two, from which there are three 
coefficients of elasticity to be determined. Hence 
Regnault also had to fall back on the employment of 
Young's modulus. 

An interesting illustration of the above statements is 
furnished by an experiment of Forbes. He replaced, by 
an india-rubber bottle, the bulb of a piezometer. In such 
an instrument the apparent compressibility of water was 
found to be barely sensible. 

232. Probably the best, certainly the most direct, 
method is that adopted by Buchanan, 1 in which the 
length of a rod is very carefully measured while it is 
under hydrostatic pressure, and also while free. The 
linear contraction so determined is numerically (if the 
material be homogeneous and isotropic) one-third of the 
compression ( 176). Unfortunately Buchanan's pub- 
lished measures are confined to one particular kind of 
glass. The special merit of his method is that, provided 
1 Trans. E.S.K, 1880. 



218 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

the rod be of isotropic material, the regularity of its cross 
section is of no consequence. 

Thus we can give for this property also only a few 
roughly approximate numbers. They are given in the 
same units as the preceding. 

APPROXIMATE RESISTANCE TO COMPRESSION (k). 

Glass 20 to 40 

Copper v 160 

Iron (wrought) . . . , 150 

Steel 185 to 200 

It is greatly to be desired that more, and more accurate, 
data should be obtained in this matter : though, as is 
evident from 219, the problem is one of very great 
uncertainty as well as difficulty. Difficulty incites rather 
than repels a true experimenter, but uncertainty is 
paralysing. 

233. Though, as we have seen, we can give only 
general and somewhat vague numerical data, there is 
practical unanimity on the part of experimenters that, 
within the limits of elasticity, Hooke's law is very closely 
followed. Hence, although it is necessary to measure 
the elastic coefficients for each specimen of each sub- 
stance we employ, once that measurement is effected we 
can trust to it as giving the special qualities of the 
material through a range of stress which, in glass, steel, 
etc., is often fairly wide. One excellent example is to 
be found in the substitution of glass or steel for air or 
nitrogen in the construction of instruments for measuring 
hydrostatic pressure. 

The first to introduce this principle seems to have been 
Parrot, 1 whose ]<!laterometre was merely an ordinary 

1 "Experiences de forte Compression sur Divers Corps," M6m. 
ie I' Academic Imperiale des Sciences de St Petersbourg, 1833. 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 219 

thermometer, with a bulb thick enough to stand great 
pressure. Keeping it immersed in water at a constant 
temperature, and applying great pressures, he found that 
the diminution of capacity of the bulb was almost exactly 
proportional to the pressure. 

Instruments working on the same general principle have 
since been introduced, in ignorance of Parrot's work, by 
many investigators. Bourdon gauges, aneroid baro- 
meters, etc., are merely special though rather complex 
instances. 

Sudden application of pressure produces temperature- 
changes which affect especially the volume of the liquid 
contents by means of which the distortion is usually 
measured. But these instruments (in Parrot's form at 
least) may be made practically insensible to such changes 
by the simple expedient of nearly filling the bulb (which, 
for this purpose, should be cylindrical) with a piece of 
glass tube closed at each end. 1 The mercury in the bulb 
is thus greatly reduced in quantity, and therefore the 
temperature effects in the stem are very small, while the 
instrument is still as sensitive as ever in indicating 
changes of volume. 

The dimensions and thickness of such an instrument, 
for any special purpose, can be easily calculated from the 
formulas of 183 ; and the unit of pressure can be deter- 
mined for it, by a single comparative experiment, with 
the aid of Amagat's table of compression of air ( 200). 

There is great advantage in using simultaneously two 
instruments of this kind, in one of which the thickness is 
considerably greater (in comparison with the diameter) 
than in the other. For, so long as their indications 

1 Tait, Report oil the Pressure Errors of the Challenger Ther- 
mometers, 1881. 



220 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

agree, loth may be trusted as following Hooke's law 
very accurately. 

234. The limit of pressure measurable by means of 
these instruments depends upon the resistance of a glass 
or steel tube to crushing by external pressure. From a 
series of experiments, made for the purpose, 1 Tait has 
calculated that ordinary lead glass (in the form of a tube 
closed at each end) gives way when the distortion of 
the interior layer amounts to a shear of about 1 -g-^, 
coupled with a compression of about -^. Hence even 
a very thick tube of such glass cannot resist more than 
about 14 tons' weight per square inch (2130 atmospheres) 
of external pressure. No corresponding experiments 
seem yet to have been made for steel. 

235. We now come to the case of bending of a rod or 
bar. Here we have no such simple problem as in the 
case of the torsion of a cylinder, and must consequently 
assume the solution as given by mathematical investiga- 
tion ; based, of course, on the principles already explained. 
This shows us that, so long as the radius of curvature is 
large in comparison with the thickness of the bar in the 
plane of bending, the line passing through the centre of 
inertia of each transverse section, the elastic central line 
as it is called, is bent merely, and not extended nor 
shortened. 

The flexural rigidity of the bar, in any plane through 
the central line, is directly as the couple, in that plane, 
which is required to produce a given amount of curvature 
in the central line. Its amount may easily be calculated 
by means of the following considerations. Let the figure 
represent a transverse section of the cylinder, C its centre 
of inertia, CD a line in it perpendicular to the plane of 
1 Proc. K.S.E., April 18, 1881. 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 221 

bending, and let the centre of curvature of the bending 
lie towards E Then obviously all lines parallel to the 
axis of the bar on the 
E-ward side of CD are com- 
pressed, all towards the 
other side extended ; each 
in proportion to its distance 
from CD and to the curva- 
ture. If we contemplate a 
transverse slice, of small 
thickness t, we see that its 
thickness remains unchanged FIG. 26. 

along CD, is diminished on the E-ward side of that line, 
and increased on the other. The thickness at the small 

area A becomes t (1 + \ where r is the radius of 




bending. This requires a tension A m, where m is 
Young's modulus. The moment of this about CD is 

A.AB 2 . . 
r 

Hence the sum of all such, i.e. the moment of the 
bending couple, is multiplied by the moment of inertia 

of the area of the section about CD. (The reversed 
strain, in the compressed parts, requires the reversed 
stress. 177.) Now through C in the plane of the 
section, there are two principal axes of inertia of the 
area, in directions at right angles to one another. 
Hence, except in the cases of "Kinetic Symmetry" of 
the section (as when it is circular, square, equilateral- 
triangular, etc.), there are two principal flexural rigidities, 
a maximum and a minimum, in planes (through the axis) 



222 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

perpendicular to one another. If the rigidities in these 
planes be called Rj and R 2 , the flexural rigidity in a 
plane (through the central line) inclined at an angle 
to that of R x is 



[Compare 228, in which the corresponding case of 
torsion-rigidity was shown to depend upon the moment 
of inertia of the area of the section about the elastic 
central line. This is the third principal axis of the trans- 
verse sectional area at its centre of inertia.] 

236. It appears from last section that flexure (within 
moderate limits) is, practically, as regards any very small 
portion of the substance, the same thing as longitudinal 
extension or compression, and thus cannot give us any 
simple information as to the elastic coefficients of the 
substance. But it has very important practical appli- 
cations, and therefore we devote some sections to the more 
common cases. 

The principal moments of inertia of the area of a rect- 
angle, sides 2a and 2fr, about axes through its centre and 
parallel to pairs of sides, are 4a 3 &/3 and 4a& 3 /3. Multiplied 
by m, they represent the flexural rigidities of a plank in 
planes parallel to its broader, and to its narrower faces 
respectively. These rigidities, multiplied by the bending 
curvature, give the couple required to produce and to 
maintain the flexure. 

237. The Elastic Curve of James Bernouli, celebrated 
in the early days of the differential calculus, is a parti- 
cular case of the bending of a wire or plank, in which 
the flexural rigidity in the plane of bending is the same 
throughout, and a simple stress ( 128) alone is applied. 

The obvious condition is that the curvature at each 



COMPKESSIBILTTY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 223 

point is directly proportional to the distance from the 
line in which the stress acts. For the investigation of 
the equation of the curve from this condition, and for 
drawings of its various forms, the reader must be referred 




Fro. 27. 

to works on Abstract Dynamics ; l but we figure here the 
special case which corresponds to a stretched uniform 
wire, of infinite length, with a single kink upon it. This 
will be referred to in 289 below. 

The investigation of the bending of planks, variously 
supported, and under various loads, is a somewhat 
generalised form of the question of the elastic curve. 
The principles involved in its solution are simple, and 
almost obvious ; but the mathematical treatment of it 
would lead us too much out of our course. So would 
that of the problem of the effect of a couple applied 
anyhow to one end of a cylindrical or prismatic wire, of 
any form of section, the other end being fixed. The 
wire, in such a case, takes generally the form of a circular 
helix : involving both flexure and twist. The extreme 
particular cases are (1) when the wire is in the plane of 
the couple, and there is bending only; (2) when the wire 
is perpendicular to the plane of the couple, and there is 
twist only. 

1 See, for instance, Thomson and Tail's Nat. Phil. , vol. i. part 
ii. p. 148. 



224 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

238. The results hitherto given are all approximate 
only, and depend upon the radius of bending being large 
compared with the thickness of the wire or bar in the 
plane of flexure. Those given in 228, for torsion, may 
be applied, under a similar restriction, to cases in which 
the section of the wire or bar is not circular. The 
mathematical treatment of the exact solution of such 
problems is of too high an order of difficulty for the 
present work ; but some of its results, alike interesting 
and important, may be easily understood. A few of 
them will now be given, but the reader must be referred 
to the works already cited ( 227) for a more complete 
account. 

239. Thus in the flexure of a uniform bar into a 
circular arc, we saw ( 235) that each fibre is extended 
or compressed to an amount depending on its original 
distance from the plane which passed through the centres 
of inertia of its transverse sections (while it was straight), 
and perpendicular to the plane of bending. But this 
involves ( 177) compression or extension of the trans- 
verse section of the fibre, uniform in all directions, and 
to an amount proportional to the extension or shortening 
;>f its length. Hence, if the section of the unbent bar 
be divided into equal indefinitely small squares, each of 
these will remain a square after bending. From this we 
can obtain an approximate idea of the change of shape of 
the transverse section. 

Consider the annexed figure, which represents parts of 
a series of concentric circles, whose radii increase in a 
slow geometrical ratio, intersected by radii making with 
one another equal angles such that the arcs into which 
any one circle is divided are equal to the difference 
between its radius and that of the succeeding circle. 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND KIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 226 



When the circles and radii are infinitely numerous, all 

the little intercepted areas are squares. The sides of 

the squares along CD are obviously 

greater than those of the squares 

along AB by quantities proportional 

to AC. Those of the squares along 

EF are less than those of the squares 

along AB by quantities proporcional 

to AE. The figure CDFE must 

therefore represent the distorted form 

of the cross section of a beam, origin- 

ally rectangular, and bent in a plane 

through OG, and perpendicular to 

the plane of the figure. The side of 

the beam which is concave in the 

plane of flexure is convex in a 

direction perpendicular to the plane 

of flexure ; that which is convex in 

the former plane is concave in the 

latter. The cause is, of course, the transverse swelling 

of the fibres on the side towards G, the centre of bending, 

and the diminution of section of those on the other side 

of the bar. It is sufficiently accurate to assume that AB, 

which is unchanged in length, was originally midway 

between the faces of the bar. 

If OG be the radius of flexure, the ratio of the exten- 
sion of one of the fibres which pass through a point of 
EF to its original length is AE/OG. Its lateral con- 
traction in all directions must therefore be ( 180) 




But it is obviously AE/OH. Hence 

2 ' 3& + n)OG = (3 A - 2n)OE. 



226 



PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 



Thus the point H is determined, and the approximate 
solution is complete. A square bar of vulcanised india- 
rubber shows very clearly the characteristics of this 
strain. 

240. In the case of torsion of a cylinder whose section 
is not circular, plane transverse sections do not remain 
plane. The following figure gives de St Yenant's result 
for an elliptic cylinder. It represents the contour lines 
of the distorted section made by planes perpendicular 
to the axis. They are equilateral hyperbolas (as in 88), 
the common asymptotes being the axes of the section 




FIG. 29. 

The torsion is applied in the positive direction to the end 
of the cylinder above the paper ; and the full lines 
represent distortion upwards ; the dotted, downwards. 

241. Coulomb, who first attacked the torsion problem, 
was led (by an indirect and unsatisfactory process) to the 
result above ( 228), viz. that the torsional rigidity is pro- 
portional to the moment of inertia of the area of the 
transverse section about the elastic central line. This is 
true only in circular cylinders or wires. It gives too 
large a value for all other forms of section. From de St 
Venant's paper we extract the following data. The first 
numbers express the ratio of the true torsional rigidity to 
the estimate by Coulomb's rule. The second numbers 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 227 

show the ratio of the torsional rigidity to that of a 
cylinder, of the same sectional area, but circular. 

Equilateral Triangle. Square. 

0-600 0-843 

0725 0-883 

The torsional rigidity of an elliptic cylinder, a and b 
being the semi-axes of the transverse section, is 



When b = a we have, of course (as in 228), 



242. From these and like results we are led to see that 
projecting flanges, which add greatly to the flexural 
rigidity of a rail or girder, are practically of no use as 
regards resistance to torsion. 

Another of de St Tenant's important results is that the 
places of greatest distortion in twisted prisms are the 
parts of the boundary nearest to the axis. 

Near a re-entrant angle in the boundary of the section 
the stress and strain are usually very much greater than 
at any other part, whether the stress be such as to pro- 
duce torsion or bending. Hence the reason for the very 
important practical rule of always rounding off such angles, 
when they cannot be entirely dispensed with. 

243. Still keeping to statical experiments, we have to 
consider briefly the limits of elasticity. 

When a solid is strained beyond a certain amount, 
which depends not merely on its material but upon its 
state and the mode of its preparation, one of two things 



228 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

occurs. Either, it breaks, and is said to be brittle, or it 
becomes permanently distorted, and is said to ~b& plastic. 

Different kinds of steel, or the same steel differently 
tempered, give excellent instances. Some have qualities 
superior to those of the best iron, others are more brittle 
than glass. Even in the case of one definite material, 
the results differ widely from one another according to 
the duration of the stress, and also according to the way 
in which it is applied : i.e. by successive large or small 
instalments, and with longer or shorter intervals between 
the applications. 

244. When a body has been permanently distorted, 
as, for instance, a copper wire which has received a few 
hundred twists per foot, it has new limits of elasticity 
(within which Hooke's law again holds, though with altered 
coefficients) ; but the elasticity, at all events for distortions 
of the same kind, is usually of a very curious character, 
inasmuch as the strain produced by a stress will, in gen- 
eral, no longer be exactly reversed by reversal of the 
stress. In fact the body has been rendered non-isotropic ; 
and, so far as this problem has yet been treated (though 
that does not amount to much), it is of the order of 
questions which we cannot enter on in this volume. 

The limits of elasticity vary so much, even in different 
specimens of the same material, that no numbers need 
here be given. Every one who has occasion to take 
account of these limits must determine them for himself 
on the materials he is about to employ. 

245. A curious fact, showing that elasticity may re- 
main dormant, as it were, is exhibited by sheet india- 
rubber. When it has been wound in strips, under great 
tension, on a stout copper wire, and has been left in that 
condition for years, it appears to harden in its state of 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 229 

strain, and can be peeled off like a piece of unstretched 
gutta-percha. But, if it be placed in hot water, it almost 
instantly springs back to its original dimensions. The 
experiment may be made, but with less perfect results, 
in a few minutes, by merely putting the strained india- 
rubber into a mixture of snow and salt. 

246. Excellent instances, illustrative of the possibility 




FIG. 36. 




FIG. 31. 



of arrangements giving peculiar kinds of non-isotropy, are 
furnished by many manufactured articles, such as woollen 
or linen cloth, wire-gauze, etc., in which Young's modulus 
is large for strips cut parallel to the warp or woof, but 
small for strips cut diagonally. Still more curious is a 
special kind of wire-gauze in which the meshes are rhombic. 
Another suggestive instance is a strip formed of wire 
knotted as in Fig. 30, in which the flexure and torsion 
rigidities for any bending or twist, and its reverse, are in 
general markedly different. Similarly a shirt-of-mail 
made of rings, each three joined as in the first figure (31 
above), is perfectly flexible ; as in the second figure, 
nearly rigid. 1 

1 On Knots. Trans. E.S.E., 1877. 



230 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

247. Kinetic processes for determining coefficients of 
elasticity are often based upon the pitch of the note given 
out by a vibrating body. We do not give any of these, 
as they belong properly to the subject of SOUND. All 
require an exact determination of pitch, and (except in 
the very simplest case, that of stretched wires, as those 
of a pianoforte) require, for their comparison with the 
other experimental data, higher mathematics than we can 
introduce here. 

248. There is, however, one kinetic process of a very 
simple character (we have already adverted to it while 
describing the Cavendish experiment, 153) by which the 
rigidity of a substance is determined from torsional 
vibrations. 

The wire to be experimented on is firmly fixed at its 
upper end, and supports a mass whose weight is sufficient 
to render it straight, but not so great as to produce any 
sensible effect on its rigidity. The moment of inertia of 
this mass may be caused to have any desired value by 
making the whole into a transverse slice of a hollow 
circular cylinder of sufficient radius, which can be very 
accurately turned and centred on a lathe. The wire 
must be attached to the middle of a light cross bar, so as 
to lie in the axis of this cylindrical vibrator. 

If JS" represent the torsional rigidity of the wire, I its 
length, and <p the angle through which the vibrator has 
been turned, the elastic couple is 



The rate at which work is done against the elastic forces 
is 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 231 

But this must be equal to the rate at which the appended 
mass loses energy of rotation, i.e. ( 135) 

-Ip 
if I be its moment of inertia. Hence 



This shows ( 72) that the oscillations are of the simple 
harmonic character, and that the period is 



27T 



/B 

V IT* 



or, if the wire be of circular section ( 228), 

'Sirll 



/Sirll 
VnB*' 



In this expression all the factors are known, with the 
exception of n, which can therefore be determined. 

The chief difficulties in the application of this process 
are the finding exactly the radius of the wire, and the 
ensuring that its substance is really isotropic. 

249. The solution just given is accurate only if all the 
circumstances have been taken into account. But a very 
few trials, with wires of different metals, show that the 
range of vibration diminishes at every oscillation, and 
with some metals much more rapidly than with others. 
This cannot, therefore, be wholly due to the resistance of 
the air. Part of it, at least, is undoubtedly due to the 
dissipation of energy, by thermal effects of change of form, 
which occur even when the elasticity is perfect. This, 
however, is beyond our province, as defined in 175. 
But a large part, with metals like zinc much the greater 
part, is due to internal viscosity. [The manifestation of 
viscosity may be regarded, as in Kelvin's view, not 
necessarily as implying that resistance is proportional to 



232 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

speed, but as implying that resistance is some function of 
the speed. On the Maxwellian view ( 253), energy must 
be lost when molecular groups break down under stress 
and rearrange themselves, the energy being dissipated 
as heat. W. P.] 

250. So long as we deal with steel, iron, silver, etc., 
and keep to torsions well within the limits of elasticity, 
the arc of oscillation is found to diminish in simple 
geometrical progression. This points to a resistance to 
the motion, partly due to air acting on the suspended 
mass, partly to thermal effects and to viscosity in the wire 
itself, but, on the whole, proportional to the rate of 
motion, i.e. the rate of distortion. 

Thus the equation of 248 takes the form 



The solution of the problem in this case is, therefore, 
of the nature of that given in 74 above ; and we see 
that, if the diminution of the arc of oscillation (per 
vibration) is large, the periodic time will be perceptibly 
increased. Thus the direct determination of n, by the 
mode of calculation given in 248, would necessarily lead 
to underestimation of its value. 

The logarithmic decrement of the arc of vibration gives 
us K, the time of vibration gives us w, and then we have 



whence N, and therefrom n, can be found. 

251. All this part of our subject is still very imperfectly 
worked out. We have already seen ( 50) that even 
brittle bodies may be completely changed in form by 
small but persistent forces. And there is no doubt that 
all elastic recovery in solids is gradual, so that, for 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 233 

instance, in the torsion vibrations which we have just 
considered, even when there is no sensible viscous 
resistance, the middle point of the range does not coin- 
cide with the original untwisted position of the wire. 
It is always shifted towards the side to which torsion 
was first directed, and to a greater extent the longer the 
wire has been kept twisted before being allowed to 
vibrate. With every vibration, however, the middle 
point of the range creeps slowly back towards the original 
undisturbed position, but the oscillation usually ceases 
before this is reached. Still, even after the oscillation 
has ceased, the wire continues to untwist, more and more 
slowly, sometimes not even approximately reaching its 
undisturbed position till hours or even days have passed. 

When viscous resistance is considerable these results 
are usually still more marked ; and Lord Kelvin l has 
discovered the very curious additional fact that this 
molecular friction becomes greatly increased by keeping 
the wire oscillating for days together. He has pushed 
this process so far with one of two similar wires that, 
whereas, in that which had been made to vibrate only a 
few times, the arc of oscillation became reduced to half 
in 100 vibrations, the (equal) arc of that whose elasticity 
had been " fatigued " fell to half after 44 or 45 vibrations 
only. 

252. Some of these phenomena are seen in a still more 
striking form when we dispense with oscillation. Thus, 
for example, suppose the wire to be kept twisted through 
90 to the right for six hours, then for half an hour 90 
to the left, and be then so gradually released that there 
is no oscillation. When it is left to itself it turns slowly 
towards the right, gradually undoing part of the effect of 
1 Proc. U.S., 1865. 



234 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

the more recent twist, then stops, and twists still more 
slowly to the left, thus undoing part of the quasi-permanent 
effect of the earlier twist. Thus the behaviour of such 
a wire, strictly speaking, is an excessively complex one, 
depending, as it were, upon its whole previous history ; 
though, of course, the trace left by each stage of its 
treatment is less marked as the date of that stage is more 
remote. This subject has of late attracted great 
attention in Germany, and, under the name Elastische 
Nachwirkung, has been the object of numerous researches 
by Wiedemann, Kohlrausch, Boltzmann, etc. 

253. Clerk-Maxwell 1 has given a sketch of a theory 
of this peculiar action, from which we quote the 
following : 

"We know that the molecules of all bodies are in 
motion. In gases and liquids the motion is such that 
there is nothing to prevent any molecule from passing 
from any part of the mass to any other part ; but in solids 
we must suppose that some, at least, of the molecules 
merely oscillate about a certain mean position, so that, if 
we consider a certain group of molecules, its configuration 
is never very different from a certain stable configuration, 
about which it oscillates. 

" This will be the case even when the solid is in a 
state of strain, provided the amplitude of the oscillations 
does not exceed a certain limit, but if it exceeds this limit 
the group does not tend to return to its former configura- 
tion, but begins to oscillate about a new configuration of 
stability, the strain in which is either zero, or at least less 
than in the original configuration. 

" The condition of this breaking up of a configuration 
must depend partly on the amplitude of the oscillations, 
1 "Constitution of Bodies," Ency. Brit., ninth edition. 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 235 

and partly on the amount of strain in the original 
configuration ; and we may suppose that different groups 
of molecules, even in a homogeneous solid, are not in 
similar circumstances in this respect. 

" Thus we may suppose that in a certain number of 
groups the ordinary agitation of the molecules is liable to 
accumulate so much that every now and then the con- 
figuration of one of the groups breaks up, and this whether 
it is in a state of strain or not. We may in this case 
assume that in every second a certain proportion of these 
groups break up, and assume configurations corresponding 
to a strain uniform in all directions. 

"If all the groups were of this kind, the medium 
would be a viscous fluid. 

" But we may suppose that there are other groups, the 
configuration of which is so stable that they will not 
break up under the ordinary agitation of the molecules 
unless the average strain exceeds a certain limit, and this 
limit may be different for different systems of these groups. 

"Now if such groups of greater stability are dis- 
seminated through the substance in such abundance as to 
build up a solid framework, the substance will be a solid, 
which will not be permanently deformed except by a 
stress greater than a certain given stress. [If the tissue 
of less solid material, which permeates the more solid 
framework, extends continuously throughout the body, 
the possibility of diffusion of the molecules is at once 
ensured (see note, 299). We do riot require to assume 
that the more solid framework has absolute permanency 
in any part. Such a framework may always exist as a 
sufficiently strong basis for rigidity, and yet be slowly 
variable. This is entirely in accordance with Maxwell's 
ideas. W. P.] 



236 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

" But if the solid also contains groups of smaller 
stability and also groups of the first kind which break up 
of themselves, then when a strain is applied the resistance 
to it will gradually diminish as the groups of the first kind 
break up, and this will go on till the stress is reduced to 
that due to the more permanent groups. If the body is 
now left to itself, it will not at once return to its original 
form, but will only do so when the groups of the first 
kind have broken up so often as to get back to their 
original state of strain. 

" This view of the constitution of a solid, as consisting 
of groups of molecules some of which are in different 
circumstances from others, also helps to explain the state 
of the solid after a permanent deformation has been given 
to it. In this case some of the less stable groups have 
broken up and assumed new configurations, but it is quite 
possible that others, more stable, may still retain their 
original configurations, so that the form of the body is 
determined by the equilibrium between these two sets of 
groups ; but if, on account of rise of temperature, increase 
of moisture, violent vibration, or any other cause, the 
breaking up of the less stable groups is facilitated, the 
more stable groups may again assert their sway, and tend 
to restore the body to the shape it had before its 
deformation." 

254. There remains one specially complex kinetical 
case of elastic reaction, i.e. the effects of Collision. 
According to Newton, the " rules of the congress and 
reflection of hard bodies" were discovered about the 
same time by Wren, Wallis, and Huygens. Wallis had 
the priority, then followed Wren. But Wren "confirmed 
the truth of the thing " by a pendulum experiment (see 
Appendix IV.). By " hard bodies " are meant such as 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 237 

rebound from one another with the same relative velocity 
as they had before collision. Newton goes on to describe 
his own mode of experimenting on the subject, how he 
allowed for the resistance of the air, etc., and proceeds as 
follows : 

" By the theory of Wren and Huygens, bodies 
absolutely hard return one from another with the same 
velocity with which they meet. But this may be 
affirmed with more certainty of bodies perfectly elastic. 
In bodies imperfectly elastic the velocity of the return 
is to be diminished together with the elastic force ; 
because that force (except when the parts of bodies are 
bruised by their congress, or suffer some such extension 
as happens under the strokes of a hammer) is (as far as 
I can perceive) certain and determined, and makes the 
bodies to return one from the other with a relative 
velocity, which is in a given ratio to that relative 
velocity with which they met. This I tried in balls of 
wool, made up tightly and strongly compressed . . . the 
balls always receding one from the other with a relative 
velocity, which was to the relative velocity with which 
they met as about 5 to 9. Balls of steel returned with 
almost the same velocity : those of cork with a velocity 
something less ; but in balls of glass the proportion was 
about 15 to 16." 

Of course results of this kind are confined to moderate 
relative speeds. The question becomes a very different 
and vastly more difficult one when very high relative 
speeds are contemplated. When the relative speed is 
such as to lead to the breaking of one of the two bodies, 
we have a problem of at least as high an order of diffi- 
culty as that presented by Tenacity. (226.) 

255. So far as spherical bodies of small size, and im- 



238 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

pinging on one another with a moderate relative speed, 
are concerned, there is yet but little to add to Newton's 
results. These results, however, were fully confirmed by 
the careful and instructive experiments of Hodgkinson. 1 
Though the difficult mathematical problem of the defor- 
mation and elastic rebound of two impinging spheres has 
been magnificently treated by Hertz, 2 his results are 
applicable only to very slight distortions. 

But recent inquiries have shown that Newton's use of 
the term " perfectly elastic " is not correct, for two bodies 
may be perfectly elastic, and yet not rebound from one 
another with the relative velocity of their approach. This 
happens, in an easily intelligible manner, when a bell or 
other body capable of vibrations is struck by a hammer. 
And it is clear that the problem of impact of large masses, 
where the propagation of distorting stress in each has to be 
taken account of, will prove a very difficult one. 

In modern phraseology the ratio of the relative velocity 
of recoil to that of collision is called the Coefficient of 
Restitution. It is not directly a coefficient of elasticity, 
for it depends to some extent upon the sizes and shapes 
of the impinging bodies, as well as upon the materials of 
which they consist. 

256. It is clear that, so far as direct impact of spheres 
is concerned (where the whole motion of each of the 
masses is in one common line), the third law of motion, 
along with the value of the coefficient of restitution, 
suffices for the calculation of the entire circumstances of 
the motion after impact. 

For if M, M', be the masses of the spheres, v, v and 
v v Vi their respective speeds before and after impact, 

1 Brit. Ass. Repvrt, 1834. 

2 Crelle, xcii, 1882. See also Schneebeli, Arch, de Genlve, 1884. 



COMPKESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 289 
and e the coefficient of restitution, the third law gives 

Mi?! + M'< = Mv + MV 
while the elastic property gives 

V - *>i - ( - tf) ; 

so that Vj and 1 ' are definitely determined. 

This part of the subject will be found fully discussed in 
most treatises on Dynamics. For illustrations of cases in 
which, even with perfect elasticity, the coefficient of 
restitution is necessarily less than unity, the reader 
may consult Thomson and Tait's Natural Philosophy, 
304. 

257. In the case of violent impact between bodies of 
small dimensions, as in golf or cricket, the mutual action 
(in the first sense of Newton's Third Law, 128) usually 
increases faster than in direct proportion to the deforma- 
tion, measured by the approach towards one another, after 
contact, of the undistorted parts of the two bodies. This 
will be the case even while Hooke's Law holds, because 
the greater the deformation the more extensive usually 
are the parts deformed. Thus ( 71) the duration of 
impact is less the greater is the relative speed ; so long at 
least as no permanent distortion is produced. 

The duration of compression is obviously greater than 
the time in which a point, moving with the initial 
relative speed, would pass over a space equal to the 
deformation (measured as above). But it is less than 
twice as great. For, since the mutual action increases 
faster than does the deformation, and is such as to retard 
the relative speed, its time-average value during the 
compression must be greater than its space-average. 
That is 



240 PROPERTIES OF MATTER 

MV MV 2 
T ^ 2D" 

where T is the time of compression, and D the normal 
deformation. This gives 



which is the statement above. The period of recovery 
is longer than that of compression in the ratio 1 : e, 
approximately. 

Some notion of the duration of impact may be obtained 
from the following experimental results. 1 A block of 
hard wood, weighing 5J Ibs., fell from a height of 4 feet 
on a cylinder 1J in. in diameter and 1J in. long, the 
lower half of which was imbedded in a large mass of lead 
resting on the ground. 



Material of Cylinder. Distortion. Time of Impact. 

mm. s. 

Vulcanised India-Rubber 11 '5 0'0077 

Vulcanite 2 '3 O'OOH 

Cork 19-0 0-0166 

Plane-tree 1'9 O'OOIS 



It appears from the experiments that the elastic force, 
called into play by the distortion, varies nearly in the 
sesquiplicate ratio of the amount by which the cylinder 
is shortened. It is very curious to find that this result, 
deduced from experiments in which the elastic body is 
violently strained throughout (being virtually struck at 
both ends simultaneously) is in exact accordance with the 
theoretical result of Hertz, in which the impinging bodies 
were supposed to be perfectly free except in the region 

1 Proc. R.S.R, 1889-90, p. 192 ; Trans. RS.K, 1891, 1893. 



COMPRESSIBILITY AND RIGIDITY OF SOLIDS. 241 

of their mutual contact, and the whole distortion was 
assumed to be very small. 

A needle-point, attached to the block, recorded its 
motion on a rapidly revolving disc of glass, thinly covered 
with fine printer's ink ; and time was measured by a 
simultaneous record made by a tuning fork maintained in 
vibration by a periodic electric current. When a golf- 
ball was substituted for the cylinder, the time of impact 
was about 8 '004. 

Thus a golf-ball (since its mass is about 0*1 Ib. only) 
has rebounded from the club before it has described a 
space equal to half its radius : so that the whole time of 
impact is of the order of one ten-thousandth of a second, 
and the average force exerted is 

01x240x10,000; 

about 75,000 times the weight of the ball, or considerably 
more than 3 tons' weight ! 



CHAPTER XII. 

COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 

258. A SOMEWHAT pedantic nomenclature has introduced 
the terms Cohesion and Adhesion in senses distinct from 
one another. Thus contiguous parts of a piece of glass, 
or of a drop of water hanging from it, are said to cohere, 
while the water is said to adhere to the glass. Such 
pedantry usually tends to produce confusion, as will be 
seen at once if we try to state in its language how the 
parts of a lump of granite, or of a drop of mixed alcohol 
and water, are kept together. We will therefore use, 
indiscriminately, whichever of the words happens to 
present itself when we require one of them. 

"We have already referred to the molecular forces which 
are practically alone efficient in keeping together the 
particles of a solid of moderate dimensions ( 167), and 
to the resolidification (by pressure) of powdered graphite 
( 53). The one characteristic of these forces, and that 
which specially contrasts them with gravitation, is that 
they are insensible at sensible distances. We have studied 
the elasticity of fluids and of solids, and have also made 
some remarks on the tenacity of solids ( 226). A few 
other instances of cohesion between the particles of solids 
may now be noticed, but the subject is one on which no 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 243 

exact information can be expected in the present state 
of science. 

Two masses of marble, on each of which a true plane 
surface has been worked, will, when these surfaces are 
brought firmly together, even in vacuo, adhere so as to 
overcome the weight of either (unless it be great in com- 
parison with the area of contact), so that one remains 
suspended from the other. Barton, early in the century, 
made a set of cubes of copper whose sides were so very 
true that when a dozen of them were piled on one 
another the whole series adhered together when the 
upper one was lifted. If a small plane surface be scraped 
bright on each of two pieces of lead, and these be pressed 
together (with a slight screwing motion) they adhere 
almost as if they formed one mass. The processes of 
gilding, silvering, nickelising, etc., and their results, are 
known to all. So are the properties of lime, glue, and 
other cements, all depending on the molecular forces in 
and between solids. 

259. Nor are we in a better position when we seek, 
by what used to be considered a direct mode of measure- 
ment, the force of adhesion between a solid and a liquid. 
In the great majority of cases, the liquid wets the solid : 
so that when we suspend a plate of the solid horizontally 
from one scale-pan of a balance, and try what amount of 
weights we must put into the opposite pan so as just to 
detach the plate from a liquid surface, the liquid itself 
is usually divided, not directly separated from the solid. 
Such experiments, besides being very tedious and difficult, 
lead to no results of the kind sought (see 287). We 
have seen ( 219) that the adhesion of water to glass is, 
at least, 800 Ibs. weight per square inch. But a force of 
about 60 grains' weight only is required to draw a square 



244 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

inch of glass (wetted) from the surface of water; while, 
if the plate be carefully cleaned and dried, only about 
three times as great a force is required to separate it from 
clean mercury. When a square inch of amalgamated zinc 
is used it requires more than 500 grains' weight to remove 
it from mercury. Here, however, as in the case of glass 
and water, it is the liquid which is divided ( 275, 294). 

260. The Internal (or molecular) Cohesion of a liquid is 
suggested at once from analogy by the tenacity of a solid. 
Its amount is large ( 219), but in consequence of the 
mobility of liquids its direct measurement presents experi- 
mental difficulties apparently insuperable. It will be seen 
later than it can be calculated from the surface-tension, 
though the value thus obtained will be too small. It must 
be carefully distinguished from what has been called the 
Internal Pressure of a liquid; a conception not very easy 
to define, because somewhat difficult to grasp. 

In some statical theories of molecular action, especially 
that of Laplace, one of the most striking deductions is 
that there must be a very great internal pressure in every 
liquid mass : a pressure wholly independent of the form 
and size of the bounding surface. This is usually known 
as " Laplace's K." Laplace's own estimate of its value in 
water is given (with the caution "une aussi prodigieuse 
valeur ne peut pas tre admise avec vraisemblance ") as 
the weight of the water which would fill a tube of unit 
section whose length is 10,000 times the distance of the 
earth from the sun: i.e. something like 10 12 tons weight 
per square inch. 1 This was based on the corpuscular 
theory of light, the numerical data being the refractive 
index of water and the speed of light. 

1 M6c. Celeste, livre x., Supplement a la The'orie de 1' Action 
Capillaire. 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 245 

No doubt the idea of molecular force was introduced to 
explain, among other things, the crowding of the particles 
together. But, as the particles are not supposed to be 
jammed together, it is clear that they must be regarded as 
acting repulsively when they are very near one another. 
Thus the first layers of particles, on either side of any 
imagined plane drawn in the liquid, may be considered 
as repelling one another, while the constituents of the 
second, third, &c., layers on either side of the plane attract 
these, and one another, across it. If this attraction be 
regarded as producing a pressure-stress + P, we must 
recognise a simultaneous pressure-stress, - Q, due to the 
repulsion. Thus, from the statical point of view, the 
hydrostatic pressure is Q - P ; and depends, at any one 
temperature, on the density only ; increasing steadily with 
compression. When there is a free surface, the density 
must obviously (262) increase, from the surface inwards, 
but only through a depth of the order of the molecular 
range. Thus there is a surface film in which the state of 
the liquid is different from that throughout the mass. For 
the rest the density is constant and corresponds to the 
pressure called K; a mere difference-effect, due to the 
otherwise uncompensated attraction on the skin. 

The case presents a somewhat different aspect when 
we look at it from the kinetic point of view : for then 
we have, in place of statical molecular repulsion, the 
impulse-energy of moving particles, which produces the 
stress which above we called - Q. 

When external pressure is applied, the values of the 
opposed stresses will (on either of the above theories) be 
increased, because of the further compression produced 
But the excess of the repulsive over the attractive stress 
will be augmented by the amount of the external pressure. 



246 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

[It is possible that the quantity II, in the empirical 
formula (216, 217) for the average compressibility of a 
liquid for the first p atmospheres : viz. 



^ 
pv H +p 

may represent the pressure-stress K ; for the formula may 
be written as 



where 

a = v Q (l -e) 

represents the (theoretical) volume under infinite pres- 
sure. By the remark above, II increases with the com- 
pression. This meets exactly the slight defects of the 
formula, pointed out in 217.] 

261. We now come to phenomena in which accurate 
measurements are in general possible. These are the 
phenomena due to the Surf ace- Tension of liquids. We 
owe the idea to Segner (1751), but its development and 
application are due mainly to Young. The more recent 
theoretical advances in the subject were made chiefly by 
Laplace and Gauss. [For a sketch of the history of this 
subject the reader is referred to Clerk-Maxwell's article, 
" Capillary Action," in the ninth edition of the Ency. Brit.] 

262. As soon as we recognise, as a fact, the extremely 
short distance at which these powerful molecular forces 
are sensible, we see that there must be an essential 
difference in state between parts of a liquid close to the 
surface and others in the interior of the mass. For if 
we describe, round any particle of the liquid as centre, a 
sphere whose radius is the utmost range at which the 
molecular forces are sensible, the only parts of the liquid 
which act directly on that particle are those contained 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 247 

within the sphere. So long as the sphere lies wholly 
within the liquid the forces on the particle must obviously 
balance one another. [Of course it must be approximately 
so, unless the least distance from particle to particle is com- 
parable with the radius of the sphere. We know of no 
liquid for which this is the case.] But when part of the 
sphere lies outside the liquid surface, i.e. when the 
distance of the particle from the surface is less than the 
range of the molecular forces, we can no longer make 
this assertion. 

Hence we should expect to find peculiarities in the 
surface-film whose thickness is approximately equal to 
this molecular range. [The compressibility is, happily, 
small in liquids, otherwise the reasoning above would 
lead to the result that the " peculiarities " should extend 
to a distance from the surface somewhat greater than the 
radius of the sphere of action of the molecular forces.] 
We must appeal to experiment or observation to find 
their nature in each particular case. And here, as we 
shall soon see, a multitude of well-known facts comes at 
once to our assistance. But we must first examine, after 
Gauss, the theoretical conditions a little more closely. 

263. An important theorem of Dynamics is that, for 
stable equilibrium of a system, the potential energy of 
the whole must be a minimum. It is easy to see from 
the considerations given in last section that, so long as 
we consider molecular forces alone, the amount of energy 
of the liquid mass can vary only with the extent of the 
surface, but we may formally prove it as follows. 

Let the energy be e Q per unit mass of the interior 
liquid, and e per unit mass for a layer of the skin, of 
surface S, thickness t, and density p. Then, if M be the 
whole mass of the liquid, and E its whole potential 



248 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

energy, we have, by summing the energy of the interior 
mass and of the successive layers of skin (which may be 
treated as having all practically the same superficies so 
long as their curvature is finite, in consequence of the 
shortness of range of the molecular forces), 

E=(M-S. Sp)e + S. 2tpe 
= M<? +S. 2tp(e-e }. 

Thus, in consequence of this property of the skin, the 
whole energy is increased or diminished by a quantity 
which is directly proportional to S. The multiplier of 
S depends upon the nature and the temperature of the 
liquid, and on the nature of the substance which is in 
contact with its free surface, only. 

Hence, when e is greater than e everywhere through- 
out the skin, as we find happens when a water surface 
is exposed to air, S tends to the smallest value compatible 
with the conditions. But when e is less than e , as when 
water is in contact with glass, S tends to take as large a 
value as possible. If part be exposed to air, and part be 
in contact with glass or other substance, the final result 
is more complex, but involves the same principles. [In 
the case of two liquids, a tendency of S to increase leads 
to puckering of the common boundary on an invisible 
scale. Kelvin regards this as the commencement of the 
process of diffusion. W. P.] 

It is obvious that precisely similar reasoning may be 
applied to the case of two liquids in contact, even after 
diffusion has gone on for a little, so long in fact as there 
remains a sensible difference between the energy per 
unit mass in the common skin and in either of the 
liquids. (See 292, 300.) In such a case, however, the 
resulting changes of form must necessarily take place more 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 249 

slowly than when a single liquid is exposed to air, as the 
inertia of the whole system has to be overcome. 

264. Still keeping to the theoretical view of the 
subject, let us consider what is implied in the tendency 
of the liquid surface to become as small as possible. It 
must behave, only in an incomparably more perfect 
manner, like an elastic membrane (such as a sheet of 
india-rubber), which has been stretched by equal tensions 
in all directions. But, while the tension of such a mem- 
brane becomes less as it is permitted to shrink more and 
more, the liquid film has still as great a tendency to 
shrink, however small its surface may have become. 
Thus it must be under a definite Surface-Tension. 

If T be this tension across a line of unit-length on 
such a liquid surface, it is easy to see that the work 
required to stretch a rectangle, whose sides are a and b, 
into another whose sides are a and b + Z, is 



i.e. T multiplied by the increase of area. This quantity T 
must, therefore, be the multiplier of S in the expression 
(of last section) for the whole energy of a mass of liquid. 

265. When the liquid is drawn out into a film, as in 
blowing a soap-bubble, the tension of this film is practi- 
cally 2T ; so long, at least, as the whole thickness of the 
film is greater than twice the molecular range. For it 
may be regarded as consisting of a layer of interior water, 
with two surface-skins. 

266. We now come to the observed facts which are to 
be compared with these indications of theory. But, first, 
we assume the mathematical theorem that the sphere is, 
of all surfaces, that which, with a given content, has the 
smallest superficies. 

Whenever a drop of liquid is left free from all but 



250 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

its own molecular forces, we find it assumes a perfectly 
spherical form. By far the most rigorous proof of this 
is afforded by the rainbow. Exceedingly slight deviations 
from perfect sphericity of the falling drops would suffice 
entirely to alter the character of this phenomenon. Greater 
deviations would altogether prevent its occurrence. 

The manufacture of small-shot, in which it is im- 
portant that each particle should be truly spherical, is 
another good example. A shot-tower, as it is called, is 
merely a gigantic shower-bath, where the liquid employed 
is melted lead, which is slightly alloyed, mainly for the 
purpose of making it less viscous while liquid. The 
majority of the falling drops solidify in forms very nearly 
spherical before they reach the water-bath which is 
employed to break their fall. 

The rounding off of the sharp edges of a broken piece 
of sealing wax, as soon as it melts in a flame, is another 
example ; and it was in consequence of the almost perfect 
sphericity of the little bead, formed on the end of a glass 
fibre which is held in a flame for a short time, that such 
beads were employed by the early microscopists as single 
magnifiers. By the use of these, Leuwenhoeck and others 
anticipated many of the results which are now obtained 
by means of the splendid achromatic object-glasses of 
modern compound microscopes. 

267. An ingenious method of guarding a liquid from 
the action of any but molecular forces was devised by 
Plateau. He simply placed a mass of oil in a mixture 
of alcohol and water of the same density as the oil. 
Here the mass assumes a perfectly spherical form. 
When this arrangement is altered by evaporation, the 
mixture becomes denser from the top downwards. The 
globe of oil becomes flattened, because its lower parts tend 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 251 

to rise and its upper portions to sink, being immersed re- 
spectively in parts of the liquid denser and less dense than 
the oil. This mass of oil can be made to fulfil definite 
boundary conditions, by bringing into contact with it 
various frames of wire, etc., all thoroughly oiled before- 
hand. 

268. If a large drop of water be laid on a clean glass 
plate, it spreads itself over a considerable surface. 
[Theoretically, it should wet the whole surface.] Now 
let ether vapour, which is heavier than air, be poured 
upon the middle of the water surface ; or let it be 
touched there by a glass rod moistened with alcohol ; or 
even hold the point of a red-hot poker close to it. In all 
these cases the effect is to reduce, locally, the surface- 
tension, so that, as it were, a weak part of the surface- 
film is produced, and this is pulled out over the surface 
by the greater contractile tension of the unaffected parts 
of the skin. The water, in fact, often retreats on all 
sides from the affected part, leaving the central portion 
of the glass uncovered. The effect is precisely similar 
to that which is produced in a stretched sheet of india- 
rubber where one part is either thinner than the rest, 
or has been slightly heated by a flame. 

The surface-tension of a drop of mercury is greatly 
altered when it is (electrically) " polarised." Kemarkable 
phenomena of this kind were described by Strethill Wright 
in I860. 1 Lippmanri has employed this surface effect in 
the construction of a very sensitive electrometer. 

269. The phenomenon called the "tears of strong 
wine," first explained by J. Thomson, is another example. 
When the sides of a drinking glass have been moistened 
with strong wine, we observe that the liquid film soon 

1 Phil. Mag., xix. p. 129. 



252 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

becomes corrugated. The ridges are formed of the 
portions from which the greatest amount of alcohol has 
evaporated, and which, therefore, have the greatest 
surface-tension. As these slide, by gravity, down the 
sides, we see them now and then stop, and even retract, 
when they come to a part where there is more alcohol, 
and therefore less surface-tension. 

By far the best example, however, is furnished by 
some of the less viscid oils. A few drops, let fall on the 
surface of a quiet pool, seem almost to flash out over the 
surface, showing in the most brilliant manner the inter- 
ference colours of thin plates. 

Another striking instance of the effects of surface- 
tension is furnished by a piece of camphor when placed 
on water. It usually dissolves more rapidly at some one 
place than at others, thus relatively weakening the surface- 
tension of the water in that place, and is consequently 
dragged about with considerable rapidity, and in the most 
capricious manner. Similar results, but of a more complex 
and often much more violent nature, are obtained with a 
pellet of potassium or of sodium. 

270. It is the same when we deal with a double skin, 
as in a soap bubble. When a soap-film is lifted by the 
mouth of a glass funnel previously wetted throughout 
its interior with the solution, it rapidly runs up the cone, 
and fixes itself finally at the place where the area of the 
cross section is least. 

Van der Mensbrugghe has devised a very beautiful 
and instructive experiment of this kind, which it is easy 
to repeat. He lays on a soap-film, lifted by a large wire 
ring, a short endless silk thread, thoroughly wetted with 
the soap solution. As soon as the film is broken inside the 
coil of the thread, the thread is stretched out into an exact 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 253 

circle which bounds the hole in the film. The rupture 
is easily effected by touching the film with a hot wire, or 
a lucifer match just blown out. [The circle is the figure 
which, with a given perimeter, has the greatest area. 
Thus the film has the smallest area, subject to the 
conditions.] 

When a soap bubble is blown at the mouth of a 
funnel, and the neck is left open, we see it shrink faster 
and faster, expelling the contained air, which is thus proved 
to be at greater than atmospheric pressure. Faraday suc- 
ceeded in blowing out a candle by the air thus expelled. 

The soap-glycerine solution, invented by Plateau, gives 
films which last for hours together, enabling us to study 
the phenomena of surface-tension even more simply and 
accurately than can be done by the help of his earlier 
method ( 267). His great work 1 on these subjects forms 
a storehouse of interesting and important experiments, 
all the more remarkable that they were devised by one 
who had the misfortune of being permanently disabled 
from seeing them. The reader must be referred to these 
volumes for other examples than the few for which we 
can find room. 

271. It is very instructive to observe the mode in 
which many problems, some of extreme mathematical 
difficulty, are at once solved practically by experiments 
with these soap-films. 

The whole physical part of the phenomena depends 
upon the fact that the film takes the form of smallest 
superficies consistent with the conditions. 

When the film is exposed to equal pressures on its sides, 
i.e. when no air is anywhere enclosed by it, it may be 

1 Statique experimental^ et theoriqiu des Liquides soumis aux 
Seules Forces MoUculaires. Paris, 1873. 



254 



PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 



made up of portions which are individually plane; in 
which case the problem, though possibly complex, is 
comparatively easy. But this is an exceptional case ; for, 
even with equal pressures, the film is usually curved, 
and it must always be curved when the pressures on its 
sides are different. 

272. Here it becomes necessary to consider the curva- 
ture of the film, and the way in which it depends upon 
the pressures to which the sides 
are exposed. A very simple in- 
vestigation gives us all we require 
in this matter. Suppose a tape or 
band, of unit breadth, while under 
tension T, be wrapped transversely 
round a cylinder of radius E, and 
let p be the pressure which it pro- 
duces on unit surface of the cylin- 
der. Consider a very small portion 
of its length, AB, subtending an 
angle at the centre, 0, of the 
cylinder. This portion of the band is kept in equili- 
brium by the tension, T, at its ends, and the reaction, 
p. AB, of the cylindrical surface. Resolving these forces 
in the direction 00, bisecting the angle AOB, we have 

2Tsin4=2>. AB = p. R0 ; 
which, when is very small, becomes 
T = pR, orp-. 

Thus the band requires, for its support in the cylindrical 
form, an excess of pressure on the concave, over that on 




the convex side, amounting to -rj per unit of surface. 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 255 

273. In the case of a soap-film, or of the surface-film of 
a liquid generally, there may be simultaneous curvatures in 
two planes at right angles to one another and to the tangent 
plane. The effects of these are to be simply superposed, as 
they are independent. Let R x be the radius of the second 
curvature, then, as the film exerts equal tension in all 
directions, the difference of pressures on its sides is, per 
square unit, 

XX) 

This expression must be doubled in the case of a soap- 
bubble, for ( 265) it has two surface-films. 

This formula may easily be obtained in another way, 
viz., by expressing the work done during an infinitesimal 
normal displacement of each point of the film : first, as 
the product of the difference of external and internal 
pressure into the increase of contained volume, and second 
as the product of the surface-tension into the increase of 
surface of the film. This, however, we leave to the reader. 
He will easily find that if t be the normal displacement of 
the element, dS, of surface, and p the difference of pres- 
sures, we have 



wliatever be the value of t, the integral being extended 
over the whole surface. 

By a well-known geometrical theorem, due to Euler, 
the quantity multiplied by T, i.e. the sum of the curvatures 
in two planes at right angles to each other, and both 
passing through the normal to a surface at a particular 
point, is independent of the aspects of these planes. 
Hence it is convenient to choose K and Rj as the principal 
radii of curvature of the film. 

When, as a purely mathematical problem, we seek the 



256 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

characteristic of the surfaces of least area which satisfy 
given boundary conditions, we are led to the condition 
that the sum of the curvatures at any point is constant. 
This agrees with the physical result. 

274. Thus, when a soap-film is exposed to equal 
pressures on its two sides, it must satisfy the given 
boundary conditions, and possess the further property 
that, at every point of its surface, 



i.e. whatever be its curvature in any normal section, it 
must have an equal and opposite curvature in the normal 
section perpendicular to the first. 

Such must, therefore, if we neglect the (very slight) 
disturbing effects of gravity, be the form of a soap-film 
exposed on both sides to the air. Thus if we lift such a 
film on a flat loop of wire it assumes a plane surface ; but, 
by bending the boundary, we can make it assume forms 
of marked curvature. In all its forms, however, the sum 
of the curvatures at each point is nil. And the same is 
the case, however ramified, linked, or knotted the wire 
frame may be, provided only that there is no air imprisoned 
at any place. 

275. If we imprison a quantity of air by the film, as, 
for instance, by forming it between the rims of two equal 
funnels, and closing the neck of each with a finger, we 
have in general different pressures outside and inside ; 
and then we have ( 265) 

ili+i 

2T R R! 

where p is the constant difference of pressures. By 
altering the relative position of the funnels, as by shift- 
ing one sidewise out of the line of symmetry, or by 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 257 

making it rotate (otherwise than about its axis of sym- 
metry), we can throw the film into extraordinary shapes ; 
all of them, however, possessing the fundamental property 
of constant sum of the curvatures 
pv^X. at each point. But we content 

\ / /^\ ~~J\ ourselves with a brief notice of 
(/ ^^-^^ \ the results of gradually withdraw- 
^ ng the funnels from one another, 
FlG 33 while keeping their axes of sym- 

metry in one line. 

Thus we may begin with the film as a quasi-spherical, 
or even spherical surface, having both its curvatures 
moderate (Fig. 1). As we withdraw the funnels fiom 
one another the longitudinal curvature diminishes, and 
the transverse increases to the same amount, till at last 
the longitudinal curvature vanishes altogether, and the 





2 




Fo. 34. 

film becomes cylindrical (Fig. 2). Still further separat- 
ing them, the film takes an hour-glass form as in Fig. 3, 
where the increasing curvature of the transverse section 
is now balanced by a gradually increasing negative curv- 
ature in the longitudinal section. At a certain limit 
this state of the film becomes unstable, and the positive 

R 



258 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

and negative curvatures near the middle both rapidly 
increase, till the walls at that part collapse into a mere 
neck of water, which is ruptured, and leaves a pro- 
tuberant film on each of the funnels. By a little 
dexterous manipulation these may easily be made to 
reunite into the original form. 

276. The facts we have just described show us the 
nature of the process by which a complete soap-bubble 
is detached from a funnel, always leaving a film on the 
funnel ready to produce a second bubble. This process 
can easily be studied by completing the blowing of the 
bubble with coal-gas, after it has been commenced with 
air, and watching it detach itself in virtue of the light- 
ness of its contents. 

Even so dense a liquid as mercury can be formed into 
a bubble. We have merely to shake a glass bottle filled 
with water and clean mercury. The bubbles which form 
on the mercury (often detached) are full of water. Some- 
times we see others coming up from the interior of the 
mercury. These are water-skins full of mercury. 

277. When two complete soap-bubbles are made to 
unite, the tendency of the liquid film is to contract, that 
of the (compressed) air inside is to expand. It becomes 
a curious question to find which of these actually occurs. 

Let their radii, when separate, be R and R 15 and let 
them form, when united, a bubble of radius r. Then, if 
II be the atmospheric pressure, the original pressures in 
the bubbles were 



while that in the joint bubble is 

in-". 
r 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 259 

By Boyle's Law the densities are as the pressures. 
Hence, expressing that no air is lost, we have 



or 

If V be the diminution of the whole volume occupied by 
the air, S that of the whole surface of the liquid film, 
this condition gives at once 

3nV + 4TS = 0. 

As II and T are both essentially positive, this condi- 
tion shows that V and S must have opposite signs. 
Hence both tendencies are gratified, the surface, as a 
whole, shrinks, and the contained air, as a whole, increases 
in volume, simultaneously. But the work done by the 
expanding gas is only about two-thirds of that done by 
the contracting film. 

It is worthy of notice that, as is easily proved, the air 
in a soap-bubble of any finite radius would, at atmo- 
spheric pressure, fill a sphere of radius greater than 
before by the constant quantity 4T/3II. 

278. As a practical illustration of the use of these 
formulae, let us apply them to a stationary steam-boiler 
of the usual cylindrical form, with the ends portions of 
spheres. If R be the radius of the cylinder, Rj that 
of each end, and P the excess of internal over external 
pressure, the tension is 

Across a generating line, RP, 

Parallel to a generating line, ffR ^ = iRP, 

Across any line on the end, ^RjP. 

Thus, if the boiler-plate be equally tenacious in all 



260 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

directions, there is no danger of the ends being blown 
off, for the boiler will rather tear along a generating line. 
And, to make the ends as strong as the sides, they 
require only half the curvature. 

Thus, also, we see why stout glass tubes, if of small 
enough bore, are capable of resisting very great internal 
pressure, when, as in Andrews' experiments ( 198) on 
carbonic acid, they are exposed only to atmospheric 
pressure outside. 

In what precedes we have neglected the weight of the 
soap-film, and have consequently taken its tension as 
being constant throughout. But a moment's considera- 
tion of the equilibrium of a plane vertical film shows 
that the tension must increase from below upwards. 
This gives an immediate explanation of the difficulty 
presented by the fact that bubbles cannot be blown with 
pure water, though its surface-tension is much greater 
than that of a soap-solution. The soap-solution is, as 
Marangoni has pointed out, an excessively heterogeneous 
liquid, and (within limits) can and does adjust its surface- 
tension to the value required at each point. The slowness 
with which the film becomes gradually thinner, so as to 
display in succession the various interference colours of 
thin plates, is to be ascribed to the viscosity of the liquid. 1 

279. "We are now prepared to consider the phenomena 
properly called Capillary, as having been detected in 
tubes of very fine bore. 

"When clean glass tubes, each open at both ends, are 
partially immersed in a dish of water, we observe that 
(in apparent deviation from the hydrostatic laws, 189) 
the water rises in each to a higher level than that at 

1 Lord Rayleigh "On the Superficial Viscosity of Water," Proc. 
R.S., 1890. 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 



261 



which it stands outside. Also we notice that this rise is 
greater the finer the bore of the tube. The cut shows 
the phenomenon in section. 

Perform the same experiments with mercury instead 
of water, and we find that the liquid stands at lower 



FIG. 35. 

levels inside than outside each tube, and that this 
depression is greater the finer the bore of the tube. 
Turn the above cut upside down, and it will correspond 
to this effect. 

280. But a closer inspection at once shows the 
immediate cause of the phenomena. The water surface 
inside each tube is always concave outwards, that of the 
mercury convex ; and the curvature of either is greater 
the finer is the bore of the tube. 

Remember the surface-tension of the liquid, and the 
consequent excess of pressure on the concave side, over 
that on the convex side, which is necessary ( 272) for its 
equilibrium, and we see at once that the water immedi- 
ately under the surface-film must have a less pressure 
than that of the atmosphere to which its concave side is 
exposed. Thus, hydrostatically ( 189), it belongs to a 
higher level than the undisturbed water, whose surface 



262 



PfcOfEKTIES OF MATTER. 



is plane, and the pressure in which (immediately under 
the surface) is equal to the atmospheric pressure. 

[Laplace's K ( 260), or whatever may take its place, 
does not affect this conclusion ; for its value is the same 
at all points of the liquid which are not in the surface- 
skin]. 

As the surface curvature is greater in the finer tubes, 
so the higher rise of water in these is a direct hydrostatic 
consequence of the greater relief of pressure. 

The convexity of the mercury surface, on the other 
hand, requires immediately under the film a pressure 
exceeding that of the atmosphere by an amount propor- 
tional to the sum of its curvatures. Thus we see why 
the mercury stands at a lower level in the tube than 
outside it. 

281. It only remains that we should account for the 
concavity of the water surface, and the convexity of that 
of the mercury. 

In the annexed sections of a concave and of a convex 
surface, in which a tangent, BA, is drawn to the liquid 
film, where it meets the side of 

the tube at B, the angle ABC of i D 

the wedge of liquid is obviously 
less than a right angle for the 
concave surface, and greater than 
a right angle for the convex. 
Hence the problem is reduced to 
the determination of this angle, 
called the Angle of Contact. 

That this angle must have a definite value for each 
liquid, in contact with each particular solid, appears at 
once from the consideration that, in the immediate neigh- 
bourhood of B, the gravitational or other external forces, 




B 



i \ 

A 



c 

FIG. 36. 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 263 

acting on a very small portion of the liquid, are incom- 
parably less intense than the molecular tensions. Hence 
the equilibrium of that portion (tangentially to the solid) 
will depend upon the surface-tensions along BA, BC, BD 
alone. The directions of two of these, and the magnitudes 
of all three, are determinate, whatever two fluids (even 
when one is gaseous) are in contact with each other and 
with the solid ( 263). BA, therefore, will ultimately 
assume such a direction that the surface-tension along it 
will, when resolved in CD, just balance the difference 
between the tensions in BD and BC. Hence, if that in 
BD is the greater, the angle of contingence will be acute; 
if that in BC be the greater, it will be obtuse. 

282. In the case of mercury and clean glass, exposed 
to air, the angle of contact is 

140 (Young), 135 (Gay-Lussac), 128 52' (Quincke), 132 2' 
(Bashforth). 

With water and clean glass in air the angle vanishes 
entirely : in fact, of the three tensions, that in BD 
exceeds the sum of the other two ; but when the glass is 
not clean it may reach (and even surpass) 90. When it 
is exactly 90 there is no curvature of the water surface 
inside the capillary tube, and it therefore stands at the 
level of the undisturbed water outside. 1 

283. We may now complete the explanation of the 

1 One of Gay-Lussac's ingenious methods for determining the 
angle of contact when it is finite must be at least indicated here. 
If the liquid be introduced gradually into a small glass sphere 
(from below) there will be one position in which its surface is 
throughout plane. By determining this position the angle can 
be at once calculated. [A plane glass plate dipped into mercury, 
and inclined until the liquid under it is flat throughout, would give 
an excellent determination.] 



264 tROPERTlES OF MATTER. 

behaviour of a liquid in a capillary tube as follows : 
When the rise (or depression) exceeds several diameters 
of the tube, the curvature is practically the same over 
the whole free surface, which is therefore approximately 
spherical. In mercury, because of the finite angle of 
contact, it forms a segment less than a hemisphere ; in 
water it is a complete hemisphere. 

In the former case the radius is directly proportional 
to that of the tube, in the latter it is equal to it. In 
both cases, therefore, the relief or the increase of pressure, 
and consequently the rise or depression of the liquid, is 
inversely as the radius of the tube. This agrees with 
the (long-known) results of experiment. 

284. We may make, in a very simple manner, due to 
Dr. Jurin, a calculation of the capillary elevation, which 
is applicable to wider tubes than those spoken of in last 
section. Suppose the radius of the tube to be r, p the 
density of the liquid, a its angle of contact, T the tension 
of the surface-film, and h the mean height to which it is 
elevated. [This mean height is taken such that the 
volume of the liquid actually raised would, if the surface 
were not curved, fill the length h of the tube.] Then 
the vertical component of the whole tension round the 
edge of the film is obviously 

27rrT cos a. 
But this supports the weight 



of liquid, (virtually) filling a length h of the tube. 
Equating these quantities we obtain, after reduction, 

A _2Tcoa a 

rgp 
When a>^, h is negative, and the liquid is depressed. 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 265 

All the quantities here are easily measured except T 
and a. Hence, if a can be found by a separate process, 
T is at once determined. In the case of water in clean 
glass we have cos a = 1, so that the above relation gives 
T directly. 

285. The following values of T are given by Quincke. 
Each datum in the table belongs to the film at the 
common surface of the substances whose names are in 
the same line and column with it. 

Air. Water. Mercury. 

Water . 81 . - . 418 

Mercury . 540 . 418 

Alcohol . 25-5 . * 399 

The unit here is one dyne per (linear) centimetre. To 
reduce to grains' weight per inch divide by 25. Thus we 
may easily calculate, from the formula of last section, 
that water rises a little more than half an inch in a glass 
tube whose bore is y^th inch in diameter. 

286. In the Atmometer, which is merely a ball of un- 
glazed clay luted to a glass tube, the whole filled with 
water and inverted in a vessel of mercury, not only is 
the reduction of pressure by the fine concave surfaces of 
water in the pores sufficient to keep a column of 3 or 4 
feet of water supported, but, as evaporation proceeds, 
mercury rises to take the place of the water, sometimes 
to 23 inches or more. The process has not, so far as we 
know, been pushed to its limits. Thus the widest of 
these pores can sustain (virtually) a column of some 26 
feet of water. It is easy to put the Atmometer directly 
into this condition, and the consequent great concavity of 
the surface of the water in each pore renders it eminently 
fit ( 291) as a nucleus for the deposition of vapour. 1 

1 Proc. R.S.E., February 16, 1885. 



266 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

287. The data of 285 enable us easily to calculate the 
force with which a boy's " sucker " is pressed against a 
stone. Suppose we have two plates of glass, 6 inches 
square, with a film of water between them whose thick- 
ness is alhj-th of an inch. The force required to pull one 
perpendicularly from the other, in which case the free 
water surface round the edges will take a (cylindrical) 
curvature of radius ^y^th of an inch, would be the 
weight of a six-inch square prism of water about 5 
inches high, i.e. between 6 and 7 pounds' weight. If 
the film were of half that thickness (at the edges) the 
force required would be double. Thus, as J. Thomson 
has pointed out, two flat slabs of ice, hanging side by 
side on a horizontal wire, with a film of water between 
them, are pressed together with a force which may much 
exceed the weight of either : and may therefore freeze 
together even in a warm room. When a mere drop of 
water is placed between two very true glass planes the 
relief of pressure produced enables the atmospheric 
pressure to force them closer together, and this effect 
increases, not only by the enlargement of the wetted 
surfaces, but by the increase of curvature round the 
edges of the flattened drop. The pressure producible in 
this way is very great, and may crack large sheets of plate 
glass (if there be portions not very true) when they are 
laid on one another with a drop of water between them. 
On the other hand, a few small drops of mercury, in- 
terposed here and there between the plates, form an 
exceedingly perfect elastic cushion. 

288. There are many common phenomena whose 
explanation is easily traced to the action of capillary 
forces. Thus air-bubbles, sticks, and straws floating on 
still water, appear to attract one another ; and gather 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 267 

into groups, or run to the edge of the containing vessel. 
This is always the case with any two bodies, each of 
which is wetted by the water, and it is also true when 
neither is wetted. But when one of the bodies is wetted, 
and the other is not, they behave as if they repelled one 
another. The explanation is easily given : either from 
the point of view of the various forces called into play 
by the displacement of the water, or (more simply) by 
the consideration of the whole energy of the liquid as 
depending on the relative position of the floating bodies 
( 263) and the consequent displacement of the surface. 

A needle, or even a (very small) pellet of mercury, 
may easily be made to float on water. The hydrostatic 
condition requires merely a depression of the surface, 
so that the water displaced may be equal in weight to 
the floating body ; but, that this displacement may take 
place, the angle of contact must be made greater than 
90, which is at once ensured if the needle be very 
slightly greased. Thus we explain how water flies run 
on the surface of a pool. 

In the same way we can explain why a piece of wood 
is not wetted when it is dipped into water whose surface 
is covered with lycopodium seed ; and why mercury can 
be poured in considerable quantity into a bag of gauze or 
cambric without escaping through the meshes. ( 100.) 

An air-bubble in water assumes a spherical form, even 
when it is in contact with the side of a glass vessel, and 
a very small globule of mercury laid on glass becomes 
almost spherical. But an air-bubble on the side of a 
glass vessel containing mercury is flattened out, while a 
drop of water on clean glass spreads itself out indefinitely. 
In all these cases the angle of contact at once explains 
the result. 



268 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

The difficulty of obtaining a clean surface of water or 
mercury depends upon the great surface-tension of these 
liquids relatively to that of the majority of other sub- 
stances. From the reasoning of 281, and the data 
of 285, we see that water ought to spread indefinitely 
over a clean surface of mercury. 

289. The form of section of a (cylindrical) liquid 
surface, in contact with a plane solid surface, is easily 
deduced from the hydrostatic principle that the elevation 
(or depression) at any point is proportional to the relief 
(or increase) of pressure, i.e. to the one curvature. Hence 
it must be the curve of flexure (237) of a very long 
uniform elastic wire, with a kink in it, under the action 
of tensions at its ends ; for at every point of that curve 
the curvature is proportional to the distance from the 
line in which the stress acts. Hence we can at once 
find the form in which the liquid surface meets a plane 
solid face, whether it be vertical or not, by drawing 
the corresponding elastic curve and taking account of the 
inclination of the plate and of the angle of contact. 
When the liquid surface is between two glass plates, 
inclined at any angles to the vertical, but having their 
line of intersection horizontal, the form of the cylindrical 
surface is given by one of the more complex forms of 
the elastic curve. 

290. The surface-tension of liquids diminishes with 
rise of temperature. And Andrews showed that, as 
liquid carbonic acid is gradually raised to its critical 
temperature, the curvature of its surface in a capillary 
tube gradually diminishes. 

291. Lord Kelvin 1 showed that there is a definite 
vapour-pressure, for each amount of curvature of a liquid 

1 Proc. R.S.E., 1870. 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 269 

surface, necessary to equilibrium. It is less as the sur- 
face is more concave, greater as it is less concave or more 
convex. Hence precipitation of water-vapour will, ceteris 
paribus, take place more rapidly the more concave (or 
the less convex) is the surface of that already deposited. 
Thus, as Clerk-Maxwell pointed out, the larger drops 
in a cloud must grow at the expense of the smaller ones. 
The explanation of these curious facts is given by the 
kinetic theory much in the same way as is that of the 
effect of the curvature of the discs of a Radiometer. 

So great a pressure of vapour would be necessary for 
the existence of very small globules of water (in the 
nascent state of cloud, as it were), that, as Aitken has 
shown, condensation cannot commence in free air without 
the presence of dust-nuclei. The more numerous these 
are, the smaller is the share of each, and thus we have 
various kinds of fog, mist, and cloud. 

292. Many extremely curious phenomena, due in great 
part to surface-tension, have been investigated by various 
experimenters, especially Tomlinson. Thus different 
kinds of oils can be distinguished from one another, 
or the purity of a specimen of a particular oil may 
be ascertained, by the form which a drop takes when 
let fall on a large, clean, water surface. In some cases 
a drop of oil does not spread entirely over a liquid 
surface, but forms a sort of lens. The angles at which 
its faces meet one another, and the surface of the liquid, 
are then to be determined from the respective surface- 
tensions by the triangle of forces, as in 281. 

Again, when a drop of an aqueous solution of a salt, 
say permanganate of potash or some other highly- 
coloured substance, is allowed slowly to descend in 
water, it at first takes the form of a vortex-ring, bounded, 



270 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

of course, by a film of definite surface-tension. But, as 
diffusion proceeds, it would appear that this film becomes 
weaker at certain places (just as in the case of wine, 
269), and consequently unstable. Be this as it may, the 
ring breaks into segments, each of which is (as it were) 
a new drop, which behaves as the original drop did, 
though somewhat less vigorously. Thus we have a very 
curious appearance, almost resembling the development 
of a polyp ; the number of distinct individuals being 
markedly greater in each successive generation. With 
a drop of ink these developments take place so fast that 
the eye can scarcely follow them. 

The phenomena of surface-tension were found by 
Bosscha to be exhibited, in some forms, by smoke. And 
Van der Waals showed that smoke stands lower in the 
moistened branch of a U-tube than in the dry one, ex- 
hibiting a convex surface like that of mercury. 

293. We may now say a word or two as to the ex- 
treme limits at which the molecular forces are sensible. 
It is not at all remarkable that the various estimates 
differ widely from one another, for they are all obtained 
by processes more or less indirect. They all agree, how- 
ever, in giving small values. Experiments of Plateau 
on soap-films, and of Quincke on the behaviour of water 
and thinly-silvered glass, give only about 1/500,000 of 
an inch. It is probable that the limits vary somewhat 
with the nature of the substance experimented on ; and 
the question is certainly connected, in no remote manner, 
with the differences in the critical temperatures ( 194) 
of various substances. 

294. The separation into drops, of a liquid column 
slowly escaping into air from a small hole in the bottom 
of a vessel, can be studied by examining it by the light 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 271 

of electric sparks rapidly succeeding one another. It is 
a phenomenon similar to that which we have described 
in 275, when a cylindrical film is drawn out between 
two funnels. When the liquid is a very viscous one, as 
treacle or Canada balsam, especially if its surface-tension 
be small, the viscosity greatly retards the development of 
this effect of instability; and such liquids can, like melted 
glass, be drawn into fine continuous threads. This pro- 
perty sometimes gets the special name of Viscidity. 

295. The propagation of ripples, as Lord Kelvin 
showed, 1 is also due mainly to surface-tension. The ex- 
perimental proof is given by the fact that the shorter 
are the ripples the faster they ' run, while ordinary 
oscillatory waves in deep water, propagated by gravita- 
tion, run faster the longer they are. 

[This affords a good example of the application of what 
is called the principle of Dynamical Similarity ; i.e. the 
effect of scale upon physical phenomena, It is, of course, 
merely a question of Dimensions as in 64. Various 
instances of the application of this principle have already 
been given, e.g. 40, 167, 228, 284, etc.] 

In two similar ripples, of different wave-lengths, the 
forces are independent of the lengths, the ranges are 
directly as the lengths, and the masses of water are as the 
-squares of the lengths, of the ripples. Hence the rates 
of propagation are inversely as the square root of the 
wave-length. In similar oscillatory gravitation waves, on 
the contrary, the forces are as the squares of the lengths, 
the ranges as the lengths, and the masses as the squares 
of the lengths, and the rate is directly proportional to the 
square root of the wave-length. 

Thus very short ripples ran almost entirely by surface- 
1 Phil. Mag., 1871, ii. p. 375. 



272 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

tension, while long ripples and short waves run partly 
by gravity partly by surface-tension. Lord Kelvin has 
shown that the limit between waves and ripples in water, 
vhich is the slowest-moving surface disturbance, has 
about 2/3 inch as its wave-length, and runs at a speed 
of 9 inches per second. Every shorter disturbance runs 
mainly by surface-tension, and may be called a ripple ; 
every longer one runs mainly by gravitation, and may be 
called a wave. Fairly accurate determinations of surface- 
tension have been obtained by measurement of the 
lengths of ripples produced when a vibrating tuning-fork 
(of known pitch) rests against a trough containing a 
liquid. 1 

296. When a solid is exposed to a gas or vapour, a 
film is deposited on its surface which, in many cases, 
introduces confusion in weighings, etc. Thus, if a dry 
platinum capsule be carefully weighed, then heated to 
redness and weighed again immediately after it has 
cooled, it is found to be lighter. If left exposed to the 
air it gradually recovers its former weight. In so far as 
this effect is a purely surface one, it is increased in pro- 
portion as the surface of a given mass of the solid is 
increased. Thus "spongy" platinum, as it is called i.e. 
platinum in a state of very minute division (obtained by 
reducing it by heat from some of its salts) exhibits the 
phenomenon to a notable extent. Dobereiner showed 
that a jet of hydrogen can be set on fire, by the heat 
developed when it is blown against spongy platinum 
which has been exposed to the air. The platinum is 
heated to redness by the combination of the oxygen film, 
already condensed on its surface, with the hydrogen 
which suffers condensation in its turn. 

1 C. M. Smith, Proc. R.S.K, 1890. 



COHESION AND CAPILLARITY. 273 

Another remarkable form of experiment, analogous to 
this, consists in heating a helix of platinum wire to 
incandescence in the flame of a Bunsen lamp, turning off 
and then immediately turning on again the supply of 
gas ; for the wire remains permanently red-hot in the 
explosive mixture of air and coal-gas ; without, how- 
ever, reaching a high enough temperature to inflame it 
again. 

The amount of surface really exposed by finely porous 
bodies, especially (as Hunter * showed) cocoa-nut charcoal, 
is enormous in comparison with their apparent surface ; 
and in consequence they are able to absorb (as it is called) 
quantities of gas altogether disproportionate to their 
volume. Even ordinary charcoal, when heated red-hot 
(to drive out the gases already condensed in its pores) 
and allowed to cool in an atmosphere of carbonic acid 
gas, absorbs from sixty to eighty times its volume of the 
gas. If it be then introduced into a tube full of mercury 
it can be made, by heating, to disgorge this gas, which 
it reabsorbs as it cools. This property has been utilized 
for the production of very high vacua; as much as 
possible of the gas being removed by an air-pump while 
the charcoal is hot, and the greater part of the remainder 
being absorbed when it cools. 2 

The student may easily understand the immense addi- 
tion to the surface of a body, which is caused either by 
pores or by fine division, if he reflect that a cube, when 
sliced once parallel to each of its pairs of faces, obviously 
has its whole surface doubled. 

297. There is another form of action, analogous to 
this, produced by certain substances, such as peroxide of 

1 Chem. Soc. Journal., 1865-72. 

2 Dewar and Tait, Proc. R.S.E., 1874. 



274 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

manganese, when in a state of fine division. When a 
stream of oxygen, containing ozone, is passed through the 
powder it emerges as oxygen alone. The ozone has been 
reduced to the form of oxygen by what is called Catalysis; 
the oxide of manganese is practically unaltered. 

298. What is called the solution of a gas in a liquid is, 
in many respects, analogous to the condensation on the 
surface (or in the pores) of a solid. 

The empirical laws of this subject, originally given by 
Henry and by Dalton, have been verified for moderate 
ranges of pressure by Bunsen. 

According to Henry, when a solution of a gas is in 
equilibrium with the gas itself, the amount dissolved in 
unit volume of the liquid is proportional to the pressure 
of the gas. The coefficient of proportionality diminishes 
rapidly with rise of temperature. 

To this Dalton added that each constituent of a gaseous 
mixture is dissolved exactly as it would have been had 
the others not been present. 

It appears that the heat disengaged in solution is 
always greater than that due to the mere liquefaction of 
the gas. Hence the phenomenon is, to a considerable 
extent, of a chemical character; and thus we are prepared 
to find great differences in the absorption of the same gas 
by different liquids. Thus carbonic acid is 2 '5 times 
more soluble in alcohol than in water; while it is 1'8 
times more soluble in water at C. than in water at 
15 C. 



CHAPTER XIII. 

DIFFUSION, OSMOSE, TRANSPIRATION, VISCOSITY, ETC. 

299. THOUGH we cannot mark a special group of the 
particles of any one liquid or gas, so as to enable us to 
see how they gradually mix themselves with the others, 
we have almost perfect assurance that they do so. This 
assurance is based partly upon the relative behaviour of 
two miscible liquids, or two gases, put in contact with 
one another; partly upon the results of the kinetic 
theory, which have been found fully to explain at least 
the greater number of the phenomena ordinarily exhibited 
by gases. Thus, altogether independent of the convec- 
tion currents due to differences of temperature, there 
goes on, in every homogeneous liquid or gas, a constant 
transference of each individual particle from place to 
place throughout the mass. In homogeneous solids, at 
least, it seems probable that there is no such transference, 
but that each particle has a mean, or average, position 
relatively to its immediate neighbours, from which it 
suffers only exceedingly small displacements. [The fact 
that diffusion can take place in solids has been shown by 
Roberts- Austin. If gold and lead, at ordinary tempera- 
tures, be kept in intimate contact for a few years, 
penetration of gold into the lead can take place to such 
an extent that chemical analysis can show the presence of 



276 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

traces of gold at distances of more than one millimetre 
from the original surface of contact. At temperatures 
somewhat less than 500, the rate of diffusion of gold into 
lead is of the same order as that of the diffusion of soluble 
salts into water. Similar results were obtained with 
other metals. Henry earlier proved the diffusion of silver 
into copper at a high temperature. See note, 253. 
W. P.] 

300. True diffusion, which is much more rapid in 
gases than in liquids, is essentially a very slow process 
compared with those convection processes which are 
mainly instrumental in securing the thorough inter-mix- 
ture of the various constituents of the atmosphere or of 
dissolved salts with the ocean water. For its careful 
study, therefore, great precautions are required, with a 
view to the preservation of uniformity of temperature, as 
the only mode of preventing convection currents. We 
will suppose that these precautions have been taken. 

If, by means of a tube (fitted with a stop-cock) which 
is adjusted at the bottom of a tall glass cylinder nearly 
full of water, we cautiously introduce by gravity a strong 
solution of some highly-coloured salt (such as bichromate 
of potash), the solution, being denser than the water, 
forms a layer at the bottom of the vessel. If we watch 
it from day to day we find that, in spite of gravity, 
the salt gradually rises into the water column, which 
now shows an apparently perfectly continuous gradation 
of tint from the still undiluted part of the solution up 
to the as yet uncontaminated water above. The result 
irresistibly suggests an analogy with the state of 
temperature of a bar of metal which is exposed to a 
source of heat at one end. The analogy would be almost 
complete if we could prevent loss of heat by the sides 



DIFFUSION, OSMOSE, TRANSPIRATION, ETC. 277 

of the bar ; for experiment has shown that, just as the 
flux of heat is from warmer to colder parts, and (ceteris 
parlbus) proportional to the gradient of temperature, 
so the diffusion of the salt takes place from more to less 
concentrated solution, and at a rate at least approximately 
proportional to the gradient of concentration. This is, 
possibly, not quite the case at first, when there are 
exceedingly steep gradients of concentration, for then 
(see 292) there is probably something akin to a surface- 
film which for a time behaves somewhat like that between 
two liquids which do not mix. This is forcibly suggested 
by the result of rough stirring of the contents of a vessel 
with parallel glass sides, in which there is a layer of strong 
brine with clear water above it ; especially if a horizontal 
beam of sunlight, from a distant aperture in the shutter 
of a dark room, be made to pass through the vessel, 
and be received on a sheet of paper placed a few inches 
behind. However rough the stirring, if it be not too 
long continued, the mixture is soon seen to settle into 
layers of different densities ; and time is required before 
diffusion does away with the steep gradients of concen- 
tration which have been produced between the layers. 
These effects can be produced again and again in the 
same mixture, and show how very much more rapid is 
the mixing when aided by rough mechanical processes 
than when left entirely to the slow but sure effects of 
diffusion. The effect of the stirring is to produce im- 
mensely extended surfaces of steep gradient of concen- 
tration all through the mixture, and thus greatly to 
accelerate the natural action of diffusion, to which the 
final result of uniform concentration is really due. 

301. The first accurate experiments on this subject 
are due to Graham, who employed various very simple 



278 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

but effective processes. 1 He showed that while the rate 
of diffusion varied considerably with the substances 
employed, these could be ranged in two great classes, 
Colloids and Crystalloids, the members of the first class 
having very small diffusivity compared with those of the 
second. Thus he found that the times employed for equal 
amounts of diffusion in water were relatively as follows : 

Hydrochloric Acid ..... 1 

Common Salt 2 '33 

Sugar 7 

Albumen ...... 49 

Caramel 98 

He also verified that the rate of diffusion of any one sub- 
stance is proportional to the gradient of concentration, 
and added the important fact that rise of temperature 
has a marked effect in accelerating the process. 

302. The subject has since been elaborately investi- 
gated by various experimenters, and absolute values of 
diffusivity have been calculated from their experiments 
as well as from those of Graham. 

Following the analogy with heat-conduction, we may 
define, after Fourier's method, as follows : 

The diffusivity of one substance in another is the 
number of units of the substance which pass in unit of 
time through unit of surface, when the gradient of con- 
centration perpendicular to the surface is unit of substance 
per unit of volume per unit of length. 

If we use the C. G. S. system, in which unit of length 
is a centimetre, unit of mass a gramme, and unit of time 
a second, the numbers obtained would be exceedingly 
small, so that the C. G. S. system is departed from in 
practice to the extent of making a day the unit of time. 

1 Chemical and Physical Researches, collected and reprinted 
1876. 



DIFFUSION, OSMOSE, TRANSPIRATION, ETC. 279 

With this we have, according to Stefan's calculations 
from Graham's results : 

Temperature C. 

Hydrochloric Acid . . . 5 174 

Common Salt .... 5 076 

.... 10 0'91 

Sugar 9 0'31 

Albumen .... 13 0'06 

Caramel . . . .10 0'05 

The meaning of this is that, for instance at 10 C., in 
water which so holds common salt in solution that there 
is one gramme per cubic centimetre more in each hori- 
zontal stratum, than in the stratum one centimetre above 
it, the upward progress of the salt is at the rate of 0'9 1 
gramme through each square centimetre per day. [Solu- 
tions of common salt differing by whole grammes of salt 
per cubic centimetre are, of course, only a pleasant fiction 
of the C. G. S. system.] 

303. Fick, Voigt, Hoppe-Seyler, H. Weber, and many 
others, have greatly extended Graham's work ; some 
using his process (with slight variations), others employ- 
ing processes depending upon special physical results 
(such as rotatory polarisation, or electromotive force) due 
to the salt which is diffusing. It is probable that very 
good measures may be obtained, though the method 
would be laborious, by using a narrow tank with parallel 
glass sides (as in 300), and observing, from time to 
time, the greatest refraction suffered by any part of a 
horizontal beam of sunlight transmitted through the 
heterogeneous liquid, the tank having been originally 
half filled (as in 300) with a strong solution of a salt, 
under pure water. 1 Lord Kelvin introduced a rough - 
1 Tait, "On Mirage," Trans. H.S.E., 1881. 



280 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

and-ready method by letting down into the diffusion 
column a number of glass beads, containing more or less 
of air, and therefore having, each as a whole, different 
mean densities, and observing from day to day the 
position of the stratum in which each floated in equili- 
brium. This method would probably be the best of all, 
could we only make the beads small enough, so as not to 
trench upon too many strata at once, and could we also 
make certain that neither air-bubbles nor crystals should 
develop upon them. The latter condition, however, is 
practically unattainable. 

304. It seems that the idea of comparing diffusion with 
heat-conduction was originally propounded by Berthollet 
before Fourier published his great investigations on the 
latter subject; but Fick was the first to revive and 
develop it in more recent times. 

The physical explanation of the cause of diffusion of 
liquids in one another, or of solids in a liquid, is vastly 
more complex and difficult than that of the diffusion of 
gases, though, in some of their coarser features, the 
first two of these are closely analogous to the last. In 
the words of Clerk-Maxwell: "It is easy to see that if 
there is any irregular displacement among the molecules 
of a mixed liquid, it must, on the whole, tend to cause 
each component to pass from places where it forms a 
large proportion of the mixture to places where it is 
less abundant. It is also manifest that any relative 
motion of two constituents of the mixture will be 
opposed by a resistance arising from the encounters 
between the molecules of these components. The value 
of this resistance, however, depends, in liquids, on more 
complicated conditions than in gases, and for the present 
we must regard it as a function of all the properties of 



DIFFUSION, OSMOSE, TRANSPIRATION, ETC. 281 

the mixture at the given place that is to say, its tem- 
perature and pressure, and the proportions of the 
different components of the mixture." 

305. The interdiffusion of gases is thus, theoretically, 
a simpler question than that of liquids ; and has been 
developed, from the basis of the kinetic theory of gases, 
into an almost complete explanation of the observed 
phenomena. We cannot here introduce the mathematical 
part of the investigation, as it involves analysis of a kind 
foreign to the range of an elementary book ; but we 
simply state that the equations ultimately arrived at are, 
in their simplest form, closely analogous to those obtained 
by Fourier for heat-conduction in a homogeneous isotropic 
solid. This part of the theory we owe mainly to Clerk- 
Maxwell. The experimental part has been well supplied 
by Loschmidt. 1 The following numbers give an idea of 
his values of interdiffusivity of pairs of gases, in a 
mixture at a pressure of one atmosphere. We have 
preserved only two significant figures, though the 
measures (which are in C. G. S. units) were given to 
four. 

Carbouic Acid and Air . . . . . 0'14 

Oxygen and Hydrogen . . . . .0*72 

Carbonic Acid and Hydrogen . . .0*55 

Carbonic Acid and Carbonic Oxide . . .0*14 

Carbonic Oxide and Hydrogen . . .0*64 

According to the theory, as given by Maxwell, these 
quantities should be nearly in inverse proportion to the 
geometrical mean of the densities (at one atmosphere) 
of the two gases. The higher parts of the theory of this 
subject are very complex and difficult, and cannot yet be 
considered as at all satisfactorily developed. 

1 Sitzungs-Bcrichte d. Kais. Ac. zu Wien, 1870. 



282 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

306. Returning to the consideration of liquids, we 
meet with certain very curious phenomena when two 
miscible liquids are separated by a membrane such as a 
diaphragm or septum of bladder, or of parchment paper. 
These are usually arranged under the general title of 
Osmose, sometimes pedantically divided into endosmose 
and exosmose. The first careful examination of them 
we owe to Dutrochet, but the earliest observation 
recorded is due to Nollet in the first half of last 
century. 

The main phenomenon, of which all the others are 
more or less complicated varieties, is simply that different 
liquids pass at different rates through a porous membrane. 
Thus Nollet immersed in water a vessel full of alcohol, 
tightly closed by a piece of bladder, and was surprised to 
find that the contents soon increased to such an extent 
as almost to burst the bladder. He then filled the 
vessel with water, tied on the bladder, and immersed the 
whole in alcohol, when the reverse effect was obtained ; 
the contents of the vessel diminished and the bladder 
was forced inwards. Strange to say, after so good a 
commencement, he contented himself with recording the 
two observations. 

307. The phenomenon is so obviously connected with 
many processes which go on in living bodies, whether 
vegetable or animal, that it has attracted the attention 
of physiologists as well as of physicists, and an immense 
mass of observations on various forms of it has already 
been accumulated. 

Its theoretical explanation is much more complex than 
that of ordinary liquid diffusion, because it is found that 
the material of the septum plays an important, often a 
paramount, part in determining the rate, and sometimes 



DIFFUSION, OSMOSE, TRANSPIRATION, ETC. 283 

even the direction, of the osmose in a trial with two given 
liquids. 

Osmose is undoubtedly a case of ordinary diffusion, 
complicated by the molecular actions between the material 
of the septum and the various liquids employed. Thus 
there need be no more reason for surprise that a 
liquid, such as the sap in plants, should be osmotically 
raised to great heights against gravity, than that water 
should rise in a capillary tube, or that bichromate of 
potash should ( 300) diffuse upwards in a column of 
water. 

308. Something very similar to osmose can be obtained 
by ordinary diffusion, when horizontal strata of two 
liquids are separated by a stratum of a third liquid .of 
intermediate density. Sometimes one or other of the 
extremes alone passes through the intermediate layer, 
sometimes both diffuse into it. A beautiful method 
of gradually developing chemical actions which, on 
the large scale, would produce dangerous explosions, 
is thus suggested. When nitric acid, water, and alco- 
hol are the three liquids, the chemical action takes 
place slowly where the two extreme liquids meet, 
as they diffuse towards one another through the water- 
septum. 

309. Though the theory is but imperfectly understood, 
the practical applications of osmose have been developed 
to an important extent. Of these we need here mention 
only the process of Dialysis, due to Graham. The dis- 
tinction between Colloids and Crystalloids, in their 
behaviour as regards a porous septum, is even more 
marked than in direct liquid diffusion. Hence, when a 
mixture of colloids and crystalloids, in solution, is placed 
on one side of a bladder or a piece of parchment paper, 



284 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

and pure water on the other side, it is practically the 
crystalloids alone which pass through the septum into 
the water. Even if the colloids be originally in enor- 
mous excess, one repetition of the process on the 
mixture which has passed through the septum is suffi- 
cient to separate the crystalloids almost entirely from 
the colloids. 

This process is of very great importance as an auxiliary 
to chemical analysis in medico-legal questions : for the 
more common of the violent poisons are with few excep- 
tions crystalloids, and can be easily and almost com- 
pletely separated, by dialysis, from the large admix- 
ture of colloids in which they are usually found in the 
viscera. 

310. Graham, in his extensive series of experiments 
on the passage of gases through various solids with holes 
or pores, recognised several quite distinct processes, each 
with its own laws. 

When a gas is maintained at constant pressure on one 
side of a very thin non-porous plate, which has a small 
hole in it, there being vacuum at the other side, the 
process of passage is called Effusion. This may be 
looked on as at least roughly analogous to the passage of 
a liquid through the orifice. The closer consideration of 
it belongs to Thermodynamics. The work done on unit 
volume as it passes out is directly as the pressure, the 
kinetic energy acquired is measured by the density and 
the square of the speed of effusion conjointly. Hence, 
under the same pressure, the speed of effusion is inversely 
as the square root of the density. This result was very 
nearly realised in Graham's experiments ; witness the 
following : 



DIFFUSION, OSMOSE, TRANSPIRATION, ETC. 285 

Time of Effusion. Theoretical Time. 
Air .... I'O I'O 

Nitrogen . . . 0'984 0'986 

Oxygen . . . 1D50 1-051 

Hydrogen . . . 0'276 0'263 

Carbonic Acid . . 1'197 1'236 

The only discrepancies which call for notice are with 
hydrogen and carbonic acid. But Graham was able to 
show from the results of another of his series of experi- 
ments, that these discrepancies are due to the fact that 
the perforated plate was not infinitely thin, and that the 
aperture therefore behaved like a very short capillary 
tube. This explanation is fully borne out by the fact 
that the discrepancies are in opposite directions for these 
two gases, and that this characteristic difference is required 
by the mode of explanation. 

From these experiments Graham concluded that the 
law of this process is analogous to that of diffusion with- 
out a septum. Bunsen has applied the result to the 
construction of a very excellent instrument for measuring 
the density of a gas. 

311. Transpiration is the name given by Graham to 
the passage of a gas under pressure through a capillary 
tube. The results obtained were of a much more complex 
character than in the case of effusion ; and the law of 
the process, so far as it could be ascertained by experi- 
ment alone, was of a different form. Capillary tubes, 
varying in length from 20 feet down to a few inches, 
were employed. It was found that the material of the 
tube had no influence ; hence it has been suggested that 
the tube becomes lined with a film of the gas, and that 
the key to the difficulties of the problem is to be sought 
mainly in connection with viscosity. The rate of trans- 
piration of hydrogen is only double of that of nitrogen, 



286 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

while that of carbonic acid is much greater than that of 
oxygen : 

Limiting Transpiration Times 
in vefy fine Capillaries. 

Oxygen I'OOO 

Air 0-901 

Nitrogen and Carbonic Oxide . 0'875 

Hydrogen 0'437 

Carbonic Acid .... 0727 

The two last results show the foundation of the explana- 
tory remark towards the end of last section. 

The following are some of Graham's comments on 
this very curious subject : 

"The times of oxygen, nitrogen, carbonic oxide, and 
air, are directly as their densities, or equal weights of 
these gases pass in equal times. Hydrogen passes in 
half the time of nitrogen, or twice as rapidly for equal 
volumes. The result for carbonic acid appears at first 
anomalous. It is that the transpiration time of this gas 
is inversely proportional to its density, when compared 
with oxygen. It is to be remembered, however, that 
carbonic acid is a compound gas, containing an equal 
volume of oxygen. The second constituent carbon 
which increases the weight of the gas, appears to give 
additional velocity to the oxygen in the same manner 
and to the same extent as increased density from pressure, 
or from cold (as I believe I shall be able to show), in- 
creases the transpiration velocity of pure oxygen itself. 
A result of this kind shows at once the important bear- 
ing of gaseous transpirability, and that it emulates a 
place in science with the doctrines of gaseous densities 
and combining volumes. 

"The circumstance that the transpiration time of 
hydrogen is one-half of that of nitrogen, indicates that the 



DIFFUSION, OSMOSE, TRANSPIRATION, ETC. 287 

relations of transpirability are even more simple in their 
expression than the relations of density among gases. 
In support of the same assertion may be adduced the 
additional fact; that binoxide of nitrogen, although 
differing in density, appears to have the same transpira- 
tion time as nitrogen. Protoxide of nitrogen and 
carbonic acid have one transpiration time, so have 
nitrogen and carbonic oxide, as each pair has a common 
density." 

312. When one gas is separated from another, or from 
a vacuum, by a septum of compressed graphite ( 53), the 
law, and even the rate, of passage come to be very nearly 
the same as those of ordinary gaseous diffusion. Thus 
gases pass through such a septum at rates inversely as 
the square roots of their densities, as in effusion. If the 
septum is made of plaster of Paris, the results become 
partially complicated by transpiration. This source of 
confusion is practically non-existent when the septum is 
made of " biscuit-ware," as it is technically called ; and 
the same may be said of all the finer kinds of unglazed 
earthenware. Here the pores are so tine that, as Graham 
says, the action ceases to be molar and becomes molecular. 
Each particle acts, as it were, on its own account. Hence, 
when a mixture of two gases of different densities is 
placed on one side of such a septum, the less dense gas 
passes in greater percentage than the denser, and we 
have Atmolysis : a mode of separating different gases 
somewhat akin to dialysis ( 309). There are few physical 
experiments more striking and suggestive than the simple 
one of surrounding, with an atmosphere of coal gas, the 
bulb (made of unglazed clay) of an arrangement like a 
large ordinary air-thermometer. The rapidity with which 
the gases pass through the bulb is extraordinary. 



288 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

313. But when the septum is made of caoutchouc the 
process of penetration is quite different. The septum 
now acts as a colloidal body, not as a porous one ; and 
the gas combines in an imperfect chemical manner with 
the matter of the septum, in which it diffuses (in the 
ordinary sense of the term), until it reaches the other 
side and is set free. Thus the small toy-balloons of thin 
india-rubber, when originally filled with hydrogen, soon 
collapse. On the other hand, when they are blown with 
air and then immersed in an atmosphere of hydrogen, 
they rapidly swell and burst. 

The same phenomenon is beautifully shown by blow- 
ing a soap-bubble with carbonic acid gas., For the gas 
dissolves in the liquid film, diffuses through it, and 
escapes into the air, so that the bubble soon collapses. 
Similarly, an ordinary soap-bubble made to float on car- 
bonic acid gas expands, gradually sinks, and finally bursts. 

A good instance of gaseous diffusion is afforded by 
evaporation of water, or other liquid, at temperatures 
below the boiling point, when air is present. For the 
process goes on until the vapour in contact with the 
liquid has a pressure determined solely by the tempera- 
ture, and by the curvature of the liquid surface. When 
a layer of vapour of the proper pressure has once formed 
at the surface, the resistance to its diffusion is so con- 
siderable that, unless there be wind or convection-currents, 
the rate of evaporation is reduced to that of diffusion ; 
and vapour is formed (at the liquid surface) only as fast 
as that which is already formed is able to get away. By 
weighing, from time to time, a test-tube of known length, 
which has a layer of liquid at the bottom and is open at 
the top, fair measures of the rate of diffusion in air, of 
vapours heavier than air, can be obtained, 



DIFFUSION, OSMOSE, TRANSPIRATION, ETC. 289 

314. Very curious results have been obtained by 
Deville and Troost with reference to the rapid passage 
of various gases through heated cast-iron. Carbonic 
oxide is one of these, and as this is a highly poisonous 
gas, the matter is one of great importance in relation to 
the heating of rooms by stoves. They also showed that 
highly heated platinum is freely pervious to hydrogen. 
Graham's researches on the behaviour of palladium with 
respect to hydrogen have afforded the means of obtaining 
similar effects even at temperatures far below red-heat ; 
and, quite recently, v. Helmholtz and Root have proved 
that platinum is pervious to hydrogen even at ordinary 
temperatures. Thus the question is one of importance, 
not alone from the sanitary point of view, nor from the 
point of view of its purely scientific explanation, but 
also from the very important point of view of the con- 
struction of gas-thermometers for the measurement of 
high temperatures, in which the recipient must necessarily 
be made of some practically infusible metal. The whole 
of this part of the subject, however, has a specially 
chemical interest, so that we are not called on to discuss 
it further. 

315. We have already employed the word Viscosity in 
two somewhat different applications. In our general 
discussion of common terms ( 37) we spoke of it as 
applied to liquids, and also, by parity of results, to gases. 
But in 249 we used it as denoting a property possessed 
even by the most elastic of solids. 

We must now consider, more carefully, its application 
to fluid motion. 

And, first, as regards liquids. Questions such as were 
briefly touched upon in 37 belong, in their full develop- 
ment, where eddies present almost insuperable difficulties, 

T 



290 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

to Hydrokinetics, and are therefore not to be treated 
farther in this work. But the passage of a liquid, under 
pressure, through a capillary tube, is (so far as it is 
amenable to elementary mathematical treatment) part of 
our subject. So is the torsional vibration of a disc, in 
its own plane, when it is suspended by a wire and im- 
mersed in a fluid, especially when, as in Clerk-Maxwell's 
experiments on gases, other two discs, are fixed near and 
parallel to it, on opposite sides. So far as liquids are 
concerned, these forms of experiment were carefully 
worked out by Poiseuille and by Coulomb respectively, 
and have since been extended, with various modifications, 
by v. Helmholtz, O. E. Meyer, etc. Later, Graham (as 
we have just seen), Clerk-Maxwell, and many others, 
have applied one or other of these forms of experiment, 
more or less modified, to the determination of the 
viscosity of gaseous bodies. 

316. Before going farther, we must define precisely 
what we mean by viscosity ; and the definition will, of 
course, show how it is to be measured. 

Suppose a layer of fluid, of unit thickness, to fill the 
interval between two plane surfaces, of indefinite extent, to 
which the fluid adheres. When one of these surfaces is 
made to move in a given direction parallel to the other, 
with unit speed, the tangential force on either per unit of 
surface is the measure of the viscosity. 

Hence, if, in Fig. 1, 38, v be the speed at depth y, 
the tangential stress per unit surface of the layer at that 
depth is 

dv 



where K is the viscosity. The dimensions of Viscosity, 
therefore, differ from those of Rigidity ( 178) simply by 



DIFFUSION, OSMOSE, TRANSPIRATION, ETC. 291 

the time unit; i.e. as the dimensions of velocity differ 
from those of acceleration. This may be seen at a glance 
from the equation of 250. 

The establishment of a simple working definition, such 
as that above, leads at once to the formation of the proper 
equations of motion in all problems of this kind. The 
process is precisely the same as that adopted by Fourier in 
his definition of Heat Conductivity ; and it is curious to 
see how all who have, in modern times, treated viscosity 
without using Fourier's method, have fallen into the vague 
and misleading methods of Fourier's predecessors. 

317. If, with this definition, we investigate the motion 
of a liquid in a capillary tube, when it has become steady, 
we are led to the result (fully borne out by the experi- 
ments of Poiseuille 1 ) that, ceteris paribus, the discharge 
in a given time is proportional to the fourth power of the 
radius of the bore. (Compare 228.) 

For the solution of the problem we assume that the 
motion is everywhere parallel to the axis of the tube, and 
with speed dependent only on the distance from it. Let 
K be the viscosity, and consider the tangential stress (per 
unit length of the tube) on the surface of a cylindrical 
layer of liquid of radius r, concentric with the tube. If v 
be the speed of that layer, the amount of the stress is 
(by the definition above) 

n dv 

2-imc , . 

dr 

Hence the difference of the tangential forces on the surfaces 
of a cylinder of liquid of thickness 8r is 



>KK dr\ 
1 Mem. des Savans Strangers, IX., 1846. 



292 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

But, as the motion is not accelerated, this must be equal 
and opposite to the difference of the pressures on the ends 
of the cylinder, which is (per unit length) 



where x is measured parallel to the axis. This must 
obviously be independent of x, and, as the motion is 
always very slow under the conditions, p is approximately 
independent of r. Hence 



a constant, whose obvious value is the difference of 
pressures at the ends, divided by the length, of the 
tube. 

Thus we have the very simple equation 



dr 
This gives 

r dv == _ _ r2 

dr 2 K ' 

the integration constant being zero, because otherwise we 
should have finite tangential stress on an infinitely small 
filament along the axis. 

Thus, if r Q be the radius of the bore of the tube, and if 
we assume that v is nil when r = r , (i.e. that there is no 
finite slipping of the liquid along the walls of the tube) 



The whole volume of liquid which passes in unit of 
time through each cross section is 



DIFFUSION, OSMOSE, TRANSPIRATION, ETC. 203 

318. This expression enables us at once to calculate the 
values of K from experiments such as those of Poiseuille. 
Their agreement with the formula above is very close 
throughout, the bores, lengths, and pressures being varied 
within wide limits. The most remarkable additional 
feature which Poiseuille recognised is the rapid diminution 
of viscosity of water with rise of temperature. In C. G. S. 
units his experiments give, approximately, 

Temperature C. Coefft. of Viscosity. 

0-018 

10 0-013 

20 O'OIO 

This means that there is a tangential stress of 0*018 
dynes per square centimetre on each of two parallel planes, 
one centimetre apart, when one is moving relatively to 
the other at the rate of one centimetre per second, and 
when the interspace is filled with water at C. 

It is well to note that from to 10 C. the viscosity of 
water falls off at the rate of 2'8 per cent, per degree. Com- 
pare this with the corresponding increase of the rate of diffu- 
sion of common salt in water ( 302), which, by Graham's 
results, is about 4 per cent, per degree of temperature. 

319. The oscillation method of Coulomb is trouble- 
some in the complex mathematical details to which it 
leads, and even more so in the experimental precautions 
which it requires. It has been carefully worked out, from 
both points of view, by many different physicists, including 
especially O. E. Meyer. Modifications of it have been 
employed by v. Helmholtz and others. The theoretical 
part of the investigation, which is very complex, was first 
developed by Stokes, who applied it to the reduction of 
pendulum experiments. 



294 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

The results of Meyer are about a sixth greater than 
those of Poiseuille. Those of v. Helmholtz and v. 
Pietrowski, 1 in which liquids were contained in an 
oscillating sphere, were complicated by finite slipping, 
which led to a new problem. Their result for water is 
about one-fourth greater than that of Poiseuille. 

According to Schbttner, 2 the coefficient of viscosity of 
glycerine (in C. G. S. units) sinks, from about 42 at 3 C., 
to little more than 8 at 20 C. 

320. The Viscosity of a gas can be calculated, at least 
approximately, from the Kinetic theory, for it is easy to see 
that it must depend upon the transference of momentum 
by the interchange of particles between two contiguous 
layers of the gas which have relative velocity. 

Clerk-Maxwell, who first gave the theory of this subject, 
found that the viscosity is independent of the density in 
each particular gas, and increases with rise of temperature, 
being directly proportional to the square root of the 
absolute temperature. 

But his experiments on air, made ( 315) by the oscil- 
lation method, gave (in C. G. S. units) the formula 

0-000,000,685(274 + 

where t is the temperature centigrade. Here a different 
temperature-law appears. 3 

Maxwell also showed that in oxygen the viscosity is 
greater than in air, and in carbonic acid less. In hydrogen 
it is about half as great as in air. Theoretically it is as 
the density of the gas, and the mean free path of a 
particle, conjointly. The mean free path depends upon 

1 Siteungsber. der K. Ac. in Wien, 1860. 

2 Ibid., 1878, p. 686. 

3 Stokes (Phil. Trans., 1886) attributes this discrepancy to non- 
parallelism of the fixed and oscillating plates. 



DIFFUSION, OSMOSE, TRANSPIRATION, ETC. 295 

the size of the particles, being (ceteris paribus) inversely 
as the squares of their diameters. [Compare with Graham's 
results above, 310, 311.] This subject has since been 
elaborately investigated by Meyer, Kundt and Warburg, 
and many others, but the exact law of the temperature- 
variation is still uncertain. 



CHAPTER XIV. 

AGGREGATION OF PARTICLES. 

321. THIS chapter must be a very short one, oecause, 
though experimental facts are to be had in profusion, the 
subject, as a whole, has not yet been raised to the higher 
level of Science from that of the mere preliminary " beetle- 
hunting or crab-catching stage." Parts of it are already 
much further advanced. The geometry of crystalline 
forms has been very fully developed and systematised. 
The physical properties of the aggregate have been 
scientifically developed, as we have seen, mainly from 
the basis of Hooke's Law for solids and liquids, and of 
Boyle's Law for gases ; and the formulation of these laws 
has enabled us to discuss, with something like a secure 
foothold, the deviations from them. 

But the mode of formation of the aggregate of particles, 
at all events in solids and liquids, is a question of much 
greater difficulty. We still require, in fact, a Kepler to 
co-ordinate the facts, before there can be a chance for a 
Newton to group them under some simple but all-embracing 
statement. 

All that our plan permits us to do is to point out 
briefly how far the Ptolemy and the Copernicus, ab well 
as the Tycho Brahe, of this subject have marshalled the 



AGGREGATION OF PARTICLES. 297 

materials for the coming Kepler. The Newton will be 
later in appearing. 

322. In the case of gases a real step to explanation 
has been taken, but a great part of the very elements of 
the Kinetic Theory ( 33, 107) is still obscure and 
difficult. The earliest suggestion of it is commonly 
attributed to D. Bernoulli (1738), but the following 
passage from Hooke's Pamphlet De Potentia Restitutiva, 1 
shows that essentially the same ideas had been published 
long before. 

" In the next place for fluid bodies, amongst which the 
greatest instance we have is air, though the same be in 
some proportion in all other fluid bodies. 

" The air then is a body consisting of particles so small 
as to be almost equal to the particles of the Hetero- 
geneous fluid medium incompassing the earth. It is 
bounded but on one side, namely, towards the earth, and 
is indefinitely extended upward being only hindered from 
flying away that way by its own gravity (the cause of 
which I shall some other time explain). It consists of 
the same particles single and separated, of which water 
and other fluids do, conjoyned and compounded, and 
being made of particles exceeding small, its motion (to 
make its balance with the rest of the earthy bodies) is 
exceeding swift, and its Vibrative Spaces exceeding large, 
comparative to the Yibrative Spaces of other terrestrial 
bodies. I suppose that of the Air next the Earth in its 
natural state may be 8000 times greater than that of 
Steel, and above a thousand times greater than that of 
common water, and proportionably I suppose that its 
motion must be eight thousand times swifter than the 

1 See footnote to 221. Also the quotation from Boyle ( 188) 
where he speaks of the space the air " possess' d notfill'd." 



298 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

former, and above a thousand times swifter than the 
latter. If therefore a quantity of this body be inclosed 
by a solid body, and that be so contrived as to compress 
it into less room, the motion thereof (supposing the heat 
the same) will continue the same, and consequently the 
Vibrations and Occursions will be increased in reciprocal 
proportion, that is, if it be Condensed into half the space 
the Vibrations and Occursions will be double in number : 
If into a quarter the Vibrations and Occursions will be 
quadruple, etc. 

" Again, if the containing Vessel be so contrived as 
to leave it more space, the length of the Vibrations will 
be proportionably enlarged, and the number of Vibrations 
and Occursions will be reciprocally diminished, that is, if 
it be suffered to extend to twice its former dimensions, 
its Vibrations will be twice as long, and the number of 
its Vibrations and Occursions will be fewer by half, and 
consequently its endeavours outward will be also weaker 
by half. 

" These Explanations will serve mutatis mutandis for 
explaining the Spring of any other Body whatsoever." 

The modern revival of the theory is due to Herapath ; 
and, a little later, to Joule, who was the first to make 
definite calculations as to the speed of the particles of a 
gas necessary for the production of the observed pressure 
at different temperatures. He stated distinctly that his 
results were independent of the size of the particles, and 
of the number of collisions. Krb'nig is constantly cited, 
especially in German works, as having advanced the 
theory ; but the only novelty which his paper * seems to 
contain is the somewhat startling, and certainly as yet 
unverified, result that the weight of a gas when in motion 
1 Pogg. Ann., 1856, xcix. p. 319. 



AGGREGATION OF PARTICLES. 299 

is only half what it is when the gas is at rest. [He for- 
gets to take account of the additional impulse due to 
restitution, 255.] 

The first approach to a thorough treatment of the 
theory was made by Clausius, who took account of the 
mutual impacts of the particles, with the consequent con- 
ception of the mean free path ; and also introduced the 
statistical method of treatment. He was followed by 
Clerk-Maxwell, and by Boltzmarin, and among the three 
the theory was rapidly developed. 

It is already competent, as is shown in works on Heat 
(to which the theory now properly belongs) to explain 
fully many of the properties of gases ; but it still labours 
under an unsurmounted difficulty, viz. the explanation 
of the diversity of values of the ratio of the two specific 
heats (at constant pressure and at constant volume) in 
various groups of gases. The difficulty is probably due 
to our ignorance of the interior mechanism of the 
particles of gases ; and it has been greatly enhanced by 
an apparently unwarranted application of the Theory of 
Probabilities, on which the statistical method is based. But 
the examination of such questions is foreign to our work. 
[Kecent views, expressed by Jeans, regarding the partition 
of energy amongst the different degrees of freedom of the 
particles, at least lessen the difficulty referred to. W. P.] 

323. The key to the explanation of the liquid state is 
undoubtedly to be sought in connection with Andrews' 
grand discovery of the Critical Temperature ( 194). 
Whether something akin to this does, or does not, hold 
with reference to the relation between the solid and 
liquid states, is a problem which does not appear to have 
been attacked. It presents, undoubtedly, most formid- 
able difficulties, experimental as well as theoretical, 



300 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

which are heightened by the well-known fact that there 
are solids whose melting point is lowered by pressure. 
But here, again, we trench on the domain of Heat. 

324. The essential difference between the solid and 
the liquid states of any kind of matter lies in the fact 
that any distorting stress, however small, if only persist- 
ently applied, produces finite change of arrangement 
among the particles of a liquid, whereas it can in general 
but innnitesimally alter the relative position of contiguous 
particles of a solid (unless, of course, it be sufficient to 
produce rupture of the mass). It is barely conceivable 
that there can be in any case an abrupt transition from 
one of these states to the other ; and, in fact, in the 
great majority of cases at least, there is known to be a 
gradual transition from the solid to the liquid states, as 
the temperature is raised in the vicinity of the melting 
point, so that there is continuous passage from the state 
of very plastic solid to that of very viscous liquid. The 
same thing is observed in various colloidal bodies such as 
isinglass and other jellies, when made up with different 
amounts of water. In this connection the student 
should again read the remarkable statement of Clerk- 
Maxwell in 253 above. 

Especially on the subject of crystallisation do we 
appear to get some light from such a view of inter- 
molecular action. For it would seem that an essential 
requisite to the formation of a homogeneous crystal must 
be the comparative freedom of each particle from the in- 
fluence, direct or not, of all besides those in its immediate 
vicinity. That there is, even in the most homogeneous 
crystals, still at least a trace of what Maxwell calls the 
more stable groups, is probably indicated by the exist- 
ence of Cleavage Planes, which are not in general parallel 



AGGREGATION OF PARTICLES. 301 

to the more prominent faces of the crystal. In fact, as 
Sorby has shown, cleavage planes analogous to those of 
slate-rocks can be developed in the majority of plastic 
solids by the application of pressure-stress in a direction 
perpendicular to them. It is thus that slates themselves 
are formed from a deposit of mud. The proof is obvious 
from the fact that the planes of cleavage are often in- 
clined at large angles to those of stratification. But we 
offer these remarks merely as a suggestion, which our 
limits prevent us from developing. 

In this connection it may be well to mention an acute 
remark of Le Roux * to the effect that annealing appears 
to preserve the state of isotropy characteristic of fusion. 
He was led to this by remarking that a glass of borate 
of magnesia, which was ordinarily transparent, became 
like porcelain or, rather, like white marble when very 
quickly cooled. 

[A great amount of light has recently been thrown upon 
the question of the structure of solid matter, such as solid 
metals. Quincke has shown that, even in the purest 
attainable molten metal, there is a sufficient amount of 
impurity present to give rise to effects which are char- 
acteristically exhibited when the substance solidifies. 
Surface tension exists at the boundary between the molten 
metal and the molten impurity, and, in consequence, the 
impurity spreads out in a thin film which forms a closed 
surface, or cell, containing some of the molten metal. 
These cell-walls may join together so as to form a con- 
tinuous "foam-structure." When the walls and their 
contents are both liquid, the complex forms a liquid 
"jelly." If the walls, or the contents, or both, are solid, 
the jelly is stiff. If the wall material is very viscous, a 
1 Comptes Rendus, 1867, p. 126. 



302 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

liquid jelly may flow with extreme slowness. Character- 
istic features of ice-structure are explainable on these 
views. The existence of the cells, on a microscopical 
scale, in metals can readily be made evident by etching a 
polished surface by an acid, provided that the acid acts at 
different rates on the walls and their contents. 

Under slow cooling, neighbouring cells may coalesce, so 
that ultimately large cells are formed. Under rapid 
cooling the cells are small. Thus arises the characteristic 
difference between the annealed and the unannealed 
states of a metal. In ice formed slowly, hexagonal cells 
which measure a number of feet across may appear. 

The cell- walls or cell-contents of a liquid jelly become 
doubly refracting when strained. This condition becomes 
permanent if the walls or contents solidify while strained. 
The so-called "liquid crystals" recently studied by 
Lehmann and others may possibly be only strained foam 
cells in such a liquid jelly. On the other hand, it may 
be possible that, at suitable temperatures, stable crystalline 
arrangements may exist, when the fluid is at rest, although 
the resistance to shear is so slight that in consequence of 
surface tension crystalline form is not exhibited. 

The slight rigidity and torsional set exhibited in some 
very weak solutions of a colloid may perhaps be due to 
foam-structure. W. P.] 

325. Whether all solids tend to acquire ultimately a 
crystalline structure or riot, we can at least seek to find 
the forms which they are likely to assume in cases (such 
as that of slow deposition from a state of solution) where 
each particle is free to choose its position of least poten- 
tial energy relative to those already deposited. This 
was long ago very well worked out by Hatty, though (of 
course) without any reference to potential energy. And 



AGGREGATION OF PARTICLES. 303 

the agreement, of the results of such hypothetical calcula- 
tions, with the observed forms of natural and artificial 
crystals, shows that we have really made a step in the 
right direction (though a very short one) to the explana- 
tion of these singular and beautiful results of the action 
of molecular forces. 

326. The simplest case is that in which the separate 
particles behave as if they were spherical, i.e. as if they 
exerted equal resultants of molecular arid of thermal 
action (at the same distance) in all directions. Here we 
can call to our assistance the analogy of well-known 
results as to the piling of shot, etc. 

There are two ways in which we may suppose the 
first plane layer to be laid down ; i.e. in square order, 
or in equilateral triangular order. Again there are two 
ways in which the next layer may be (symmetrically) 
deposited, i.e. particle above particle, or particle above 
the middle point of each square, or of each equilateral 
triangle. The two latter cases, however, are really the 
same arrangement, so far as the relative positions of 
contiguous particles are concerned ; as we see at once by 
looking at one of the faces of a four-sided pyramid 
built up on a square base. For in the face the order is 
triangular. Or, if we remove one edge from the three- 
sided pyramid built on an equilateral triangular base, 
we find the particles in the plane of replacement to be 
in square order. 

We find these two forms, apparently so different, in 
many species both of natural and of artificial crystals. 
Thus the regular oktahedron, which is merely two four- 
sided pyramids built on opposite sides of the same square 
base, and its hemihedral form, the regular tetrahedron, 
which is the three-sided pyramid built on an equilateral 



304 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

triangular base, are both met with in various substances 
belonging to the Cubic System. The measured angles 
between the several pairs of faces are found to agree 
exactly with those of the geometrical solids. 

327. An imperfectly developed oktahedron, when the 
imperfection is symmetrical, may assume various forms, 
all of which are met with in actual crystals. Thus, 
suppose we remove layer after layer, symmetrically, 
from the summits of the oktahedron. The new faces 
thus produced form parts of the faces of a cube ; and 
we may obtain the cube complete by continuing the 
process till the last trace of the oktahedral faces has been 
removed. 

Replace, symmetrically, the edges either of the oktahe- 
dron or of the cube, and we produce a set of parts of the 
faces of what is called a Rhombic Dodekahedron (Fig. 41). 
Many natural crystals assume symmetrical forms con- 
taining faces belonging respectively to the oktahedron, 
the cube truncating its summits, and the rhombic dode- 
kahedron replacing its edges. 

Instead of replacing each edge by a single plane 
equally inclined to the faces which meet in that edge, 
suppose we bevel it symmetrically by two planes. We 
shall now no longer have a form with fixed angles (i.e. 
invariable shape) as in the cases previously mentioned, 
but one which (though its general character is determined) 
will have its form dependent on the inclination of the 
bevelling planes to the faces which meet in the edge 
bevelled. Here, again, the geometrical results are found 
to fit the forms actually presented in nature. 

It is an interesting and instructive work for the 
student to verify these statements by operating on a 
lump of soft chalk, or (still better) stiff putty or 



AGGREGATION OF PARTICLES. 305 

modeller's clay, by means of a broad, but thin, bladed 
knife. 

328. This is not the place to enter into crystallo- 
graphic details, but we may introduce the following 
statement, which includes all the above results, and 
is found, at all events, to accord fully with the general 
appearance of any of the very numerous crystals belong- 
ing to what is called the cubic system. 

Any three axes which meet, but which do not lie in 
one plane, being chosen, the equation of any plane 
whatever, which does not pass through the origin, can 
be written in the form 



Here h, &, and I are finite quantities, the reciprocals of 
the distances from the origin at which the plane meets 
the axes respectively. 

To obtain all the plane faces of any one simple 
form of crystal, all we have to do is to give to 
h, Jc, I in the above expression all admissible values 
in succession. 

329. When we take the cubic system, of which alone 
we have yet spoken, symmetry shows that if the three 
axes be taken as the lines joining pairs of opposite 
summits of the oktahedron, obtained as in 326 above, 
these will possess properties absolutely alike. Thus 
symmetry further shows that the numbers h, Jc, I may be 
arranged in any order, for what is true of any one of the 
axes is true of each of the others. Similar considerations 
show that each of h, k, Z, independent of the others, may 
be either positive or negative. These quantities are 
always found, in actual crystals, to have their ratios 
rigorously expressible in small Whole Numbers. [This, 
of itself, is a very strong argument in favour of the 

U 



306 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

notion that the crystal is built up of little parts, all equal 
to one another.] 

The numbers h, It, I can be arranged in six different 
orders ; and, as any one of these orders has eight possible 
arrangements of signs, there are forty-eight symmetrically 
arranged plane triangular faces on the most general simple 
form of this system. This form is found in many natural 
crystals, and is called a hexakis-oktahedron (Fig. 37). 

When two of h, k, I are equal, it is usual to divide the 
forms into two groups according as the third is less or 
greater than the others. JBoth classes have twenty-four 
faces only, but in the first group they are triangular, in 
the second quadrilateral. These are, respectively, the 
triakis-oktahedron (Fig. 38) and the eikositetrahedron 
(Fig. 39) which are derived respectively from the 
oktahedron by symmetrical bevelling of its edges, and 
by symmetrical blunting of its summits. 

Intermediate to these there is the case when all three 
of h, k, I are equal, and we have the oktahedron itself. 

There is also a limiting case when the third vanishes. 
This is the rhombic dodekahedron (Fig. 41) discussed in 
327 ; and of course it also forms the limiting case of the 
series when one of h, k, I vanishes and the others are un- 
equal, called the tetrakis-hexahedron (Fig. 40), obtained 
by symmetrical bevelling of the edges of the cube. 

When two vanish we have the 
cube. 

The following figure shows the 
Hexakis-Oktahedron, an octant (lying 
among the positive axes of x. y, 2), 
being specially lettered for reference, 
and we can easily see how it degrades 
into the other forms. FIG. 37. 




AGGREGATION OF PARTICLES. 



307 



Thus if xCy, and therefore yAz and zBx, become 
straight lines (i.e. if the planes marked a and b t c and d, 
e and/, coincide in pairs), the figure 
becomes the triakis-oktahedron (Fig. 
38). This degrades into the okta- 
hedron if D be in the plane xyz (i.e. 
if a, b, c, d, e, f, are all one plane) : 
and into the rhombic dodekahedron 
if DC be perpendicular to the plane 
of xy (i.e. if a, b, a', b', are all parts 
of one plane). FIG - 38 - 

Again, if the planes/ and a, b and c, d and e, coincide 
in pairs, we have the eikositetrahedron (Fig 39). 





FIG. 39. 





FIG. 40. 



FIG. 41. 



If ADB be parallel to the plane of xy, etc., the angle 
ADB is a right angle, the planes / and /', a and a', b and 
b', etc., coincide in pairs, and the figure is the tetrakis- 



308 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

hexahedron (Fig. 40), which becomes the cube when/',/, 
a, a', etc., are all in one plane ; and the rhombic dodeka- 
hedron when a, a, b and //, are all in one plane. 

330. Six faces of the rhombic dodekahedron are 
parallel to the line joining D with the origin, and are 
situated symmetrically round it. If, then, these faces 
be extended in their own planes without any alteration 
of the two groups of three forming the other faces, the 
whole will become a regular hexagonal prism with ends 
consisting each of three equal rhombic faces with their 
greater angles in contact at the summit. This is found, 
by measurement, to be the form of a bee's cell. And a 
series of these dodekahedra (all equally and similarly 
distorted from equal rhombic dodekahedra) can (like 
them) be so packed together as to fill space without 
leaving interstices, as in a honeycomb. 

331. If, instead of building up a mass of equal spheres, 
we use similar, equal, and similarly situated ellipsoids of 
revolution, we must make corresponding alterations in 
our rules for h, k, I above. If the chief axes of the ellip- 
soids be perpendicular to the layers of particles, the 
x, y, z axes are still a rectangular system, but h (say) is 
no longer interchangeable with k or with I. For h is 
now a small integral multiple of a parameter which 
depends on the chief axis of the ellipsoid, while k and I 
are similar multiples of the (equal) parameters of the 
other two axes. This greatly reduces the number of 
possible faces in the simple forms. 

If the particles are similar, equal, and similarly situated 
ellipsoids, touching one another in a layer by the ends of 
two of their axes, the x, y, z system is still rectangular, 
but no two of h, k, I are interchangeable.' 

In any other arrangement, which is capable of giving 



AGGREGATION OF PARTICLES. 309 

a homogeneous whole, the simplest x, y, z system is no 
longer rectangular ; and the ellipsoids, though still 
similar, equal, and similarly situated, may come in 
contact (in threes) in an infinity of different ways. 

There is no known form of crystallised matter whose 
separate faces cannot be exactly accounted for by results 
based on these premises, though there are many cases 
of hemihedry, etc., in which the faces geometrically 
determined for a simple form present themselves only in 
selected groups. 

332. In what we have said above, the only assumptions 
made (for the purpose of explaining homogeneity) were 
that the particles grouped were themselves equal, similar, 
and similarly situated ; and that the arrangement of its 
neighbours round it was exactly the same for each 
particle. 

But it is easy to conceive that very different results 
may be obtained, even with identical materials, according 
to circumstances. Every one who has seen water which 
is full of excessively small ice crystals, and is pre- 
vented only by currents from becoming solid ice, may 
easily imagine a state of things in which the particles 
(which, otherwise, would have been deposited one by 
one to form a crystal) may arrange themselves in very 
small, but similar and equal, groups before they are 
deposited. Thus the aggregates, above contemplated, 
may be built up, not directly of individual particles, 
but of other less complex though (among themselves) 
similar and equal sets of aggregated particles. Here 
again we come back to the same idea as that in the 
quotation from Clerk-Maxwell ( 253), and may employ 
it for the purpose of explaining the existence of cleavage 
planes, etc. 



310 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

333. The aggregations we have considered have been 
such as take place freely; but if we consider what is 
likely to happen under circumstances of temporary or 
permanent stress, as, for instance, in a Rupert's drop, 
or any other melted mass of which a portion is cooled 
and solidified more suddenly than the rest, we see 
that we cannot expect a result in which the potential 
energy of the whole shall be as small as possible ; 
and are, therefore, prepared to find that such bodies, 
unless carefully annealed, are essentially in unstable 
equilibrium. 



[CHAPTER XV. 

DISINTEGRATION OF THE ATOM. 

334. A CONSIDERABLE number of the so-called elements 
possess atomic weights which are exactly or very nearly 
multiples of the atomic weight of hydrogen. This fact 
suggests a common origin, and Prout long ago put forward 
the hypothesis that the atoms of the other elements were 
compounded of atoms of hydrogen. The hypothesis of a 
common origin cannot now be maintained in this crude 
form ; for further investigation has shown that small 
divergences from integral multiples of the atomic weight 
of hydrogen are real, and has shown also that large 
divergences exist. 

But the discovery by Mendeleeff of a periodic relation 
connecting chemical and physical properties of the 
elements with their atomic weights, has placed the idea 
of a common origin on a more certain basis. So definite 
is this relation that, by its means, the atomic weights of 
unknown elements have been predicted; and the pre- 
dictions have been subsequently verified. At present 
the relation has a purely empirical foundation, but its 
theoretical establishment in the future may be confidently 
anticipated. 

335. If, then, the atoms have been built up as a 
congeries of smaller components, it might be expected 



312 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

that, under suitable circumstances, their disintegration 
would occur. Until recently, such disintegration had 
never been observed. 

Phenomena which are evident when an electric dis- 
charge passes through a rarefied gas in a vacuum tube 
were explained by J. J. Thomson on the assumption 
that they were due to the rapid propulsion of small 
electrified particles from the negative electrode in the tube. 
It is possible by suitable methods to measure the mass 
of these particles. Whatever be the chemical nature of 
the electrodes, or of the gas in the tube, the result is the 
same, and the mass indicated is of the order of one 
thousandth part of the mass of a hydrogen atom. These 
facts are practically conclusive in favour of the idea that 
we are here dealing with the elemental unit out of which 
material substances are formed. 

336. These corpuscles always carry individually a 
definite charge of negative electricity ; and the possession 
of this charge contributes, in accordance with the known 
laws of electricity in motion, to their inertia. Whether, 
or not, all inertia is of this type is at present an open 
question. Any such " explanation " of inertia, however, 
merely transfers the difficulty to another stage. Just as, 
in the vortex atom hypothesis, inertia must be ascribed to 
the medium whose rotating parts form the atoms ; so the 
inertia which is specially manifested when the motion of 
electric charges is accelerated must be ascribed to the 
medium through which electrical action is propagated. 

In Larmor's view (see 18 and App. V.) these 
negatively charged corpuscles otherwise called electrons, 
or electrions are essentially centres of rotational strain 
in the ether. Without considering in detail the nature 
of their relation to ether, J. J. Thomson, Kelvin (see 



DISINTEGEATION OF THE ATOM. 313 

App. VI.), and others, have developed to some extent the 
properties of an atom regarded as constituted of electrions 
at rest relatively to, or revolving round, the centre of 
a uniform sphere of positive electricity. Thomson has 
shown that a series of such atoms, differing in the number 
of electrions present in each, exhibit periodic properties 
which are analogous to those exhibited in MendeleefFs 
periodic law. The vibrations of such atoms would give 
rise to radiation whose spectrum would present strong 
analogies to the line and band spectra of known elements. 

337. A very simple case will suffice to show that the 
occasional disintegration of such an atom is to be expected. 
Symmetry and the laws of electrical action ensure that 
four electrions will be in stable equilibrium in the interior 
of a spherical space, which is uniformly charged with 
positive electricity throughout its volume, provided that 
they are situated at the corners of an equilateral tetra- 
hedron having the same centre as the sphere has. If this 
system be made to revolve round a diameter of the sphere, 
centrifugal force tends to make the electrions pass to 
positions remote from the axis of revolution ; and, 
ultimately, at sufficient rotational speed, a new position 
of equilibrium will evidently be attained with the four 
electrions situated at the corners of a square in the 
equatorial plane. Conversely, if the speed of rotation be 
now slowed down, this square arrangement will become 
unstable when the critical speed is again reached, and a 
re-arrangement will again take place. 

In such re-arrangements of electrions in an atom, it is 
quite possible that one electrion may acquire so great 
linear speed that it will be projected out of the system. 
Thus disintegration is to be expected in such a system, 
provided that a cause for diminution of rotational speed 



314 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

exists. Now, such a system is constantly radiating 
energy. Consequently, if it receives no equivalent supply, 
its energy of rotational motion must diminish, and dis- 
integration will follow. 

338. On the preceding view, the energy manifested on 
disintegration comes from an internal store of potential 
energy. Another possible source, insisted upon by Lord 
Kelvin, cannot be overlooked ; that is, radiational energy 
absorbed from the ether. Out of a given number of 
atoms, the fraction disintegrating per second in consequence 
of sudden exhaustion of internal potential energy, on the 
one view, might be the same as the fraction disintegrating 
per second in consequence of sudden absorption of energy 
from the ether, on the other view. Either end might be 
brought about as a result of slow loss of internal energy 
because of radiation into space. 

339. Rontgen rays, which are produced under suitable 
conditions in the vacuum tube discharge, give rise to 
strong fluorescence when they fall upon fluorescent bodies, 
and also produce certain characteristic electrical effects 
in connection therewith. H. Becquerel sought for the 
converse effect an emission of Rontgen rays by fluorescent 
bodies and he found that there was an emission from 
uranium oxide which presented some analogies in its 
action to certain of the actions produced by Rontgen 
rays. Some specimens of pitch blende (mainly uranium 
oxide) were found to be specially active ; and this powerful 
activity was shown by the Curies to be due to the presence, 
in small quantity, of a new element now well known as 
radium. 

The peculiar quality of radium, called its radio-activity, 
is associated with its ready emission of negative corpuscles 
or electrions. Indeed, as a matter of historical fact, the 



DISINTEGRATION OF THE ATOM. 316 

mass of an electrion was first determined by means of 
observations made upon the electrions emitted by radium, 
and not upon those observed in the vacuum tube discharge, 
as described in 335. 

The phenomenon of radio-activity is now known to be 
manifested to a greater or less extent by many substances, 
and it is probable that all matter exhibits it. It seems 
certain that helium is produced in the disintegration 
of radium; and there are reasons, although somewhat 
hypothetical, for the supposition that radium results from 
the disintegration of uranium, and that lead may be the 
final product of the disintegration of radium. W. P.] 



APPENDIX I. ( 18). 

HYPOTHESES AS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF MATTER. 
By Professor Flint, D.D. 

1. ALL material substances are infinitely divisible into 
parts of the same nature as themselves and as complex, 
even qualitatively, as themselves. 

2. All material substances are divisible into ultimate 
indivisible homogeneous parts as complex as the wholes. 

One or other of these two hypotheses (it is, perhaps, 
impossible to determine which) is attributed by Lucretius 
to Anaxagoras, whose real opinion, however, was probably 
the one which follows. 

3. All material substances are formed from a primitive 
matter, "in which all things were together, infinitely 
numerous, infinitely little," and of which each infinitely 
little part was infinitely complex. 

4. All material substances result from the combination 
of a few kinds of material elements, each of which is 
composed of particles like to itself, e.g., earth of earthy 
particles, water of aqueous particles, air of aerial particles. 
This was the hypothesis of the Hindu Kanada, the 
Greek Empedocles, and a host of medieval physicists. 

5. All material substances are states or stages of one 



APPENDIX I. 317 

primitive matter or element, e.g. of water or air. The 
hypothesis of Thales, Aj^aximenes, etc. 

6. All material substances are divisible into ultimate 
indivisible parts, " strong in solid singleness," which have 
no qualitative but only quantitative differences, and 
which variously aggregate through motion in a void. 

This is the atomic hypothesis as taught by Democritus, 
Epicurus, etc. 

7. All material substances are divisible into elementary 
substances which are subdivisible into molecules, and, 
ultimately, into atoms possessed of distinctive qualita- 
tive as well as quantitative differences. Recently, and 
probably still, the ordinary chemical hypothesis. 

8. All material substances are divisible into so-called 
elementary substances composed of molecular particles 
of the same nature as themselves, but these molecular 
particles are complicated structures consisting of congre- 
gations of truly elementary atoms, identical in nature 
and differing only in position, arrangement, motion, etc., 
and the molecules or chemical atoms are produced from 
the true or physical atoms by processes of evolution 
under conditions which Chemistry has not yet been able 
to reproduce. Hypothesis of H. Spencer, etc. 

9. All material substances are composed of atoms, not 
hard and solid and on that account indivisible, but the 
rotatory rings or infinitesimal whirls of an incompressible 
frictionless fluid, supposed to be homogeneous and perfect, 
but the nature of which is not otherwise described ; and 
all the differences of material substances are due to the 
characters and behaviour of their component rings or 
whirls. The hypothesis of Sir William Thomson. 

10. The matter which is the object of the senses is 
the product of a world-building power moulding in accord- 



318 PROPERTIES OF MATTER. 

ance with eternal ideas an uncreated substratum, the 
" receptacle " and " nurse " of " forms," hut itself devoid 
of form and definite attributes. Plato's hypothesis. 

11. The matter which is an object of sense is a 
synthesis of form with a primary matter which is merely 
capacity and passivity a synthesis produced by a for- 
mative cause, which must be both an efficient and final 
cause. Aristotle's hypothesis. 

12. Impenetrability is the essence of matter. Hypo- 
thesis of various physicists. 

13. Extension, not impenetrability, is the essence of 
matter. "Give me extension and motion and I will 
construct the world." Descartes. 

14. Material things are "modes" of extension, which 
is one of the only two discoverable " attributes " of the 
one " Substance." Spinoza. 

15. Matter in its ultimate constitution consists of 
metaphysical points which give rise to sensible matter by 
states of effort (conatus) transitional from rest to motion. 
The nypothesis of Yico. See my " Vico." 

16. The ultimate elements of matter are indivisible 
points without extension, but surrounded by spheres of 
attractive and repulsive force which alternate according 
to the distance of these points up to a certain degree of 
remoteness. Hypothesis of Boscovich. 

17. The physical universe is constituted by the un- 
conscious perceptions of a vast collection of unextended 
spiritual forces or monads, endowed with a power of 
spontaneous development and with something of the 
nature of desire and sentime