Skip to main content

Full text of "Psychological review"

See other formats


UNIV.  OF 

fORONTO 

LIBRARY 


or 


BINDING  LIST  VIAR  1  5 


PSYCHOLOGICAL  RXVUW  PUBLICATION 

Psychological  Review 

SDITKD  BY 

HOWARD  C  WARREN,   PRINCETON  UNIVERSITY 
JOHN  B.  WATSON,  NEW  YORK  CITY  (J.ofExp.  Psyckol.) 

JAMES  R.  ANGELL,  522  FIFTH  AVENUE,  NEW  YORK  (Monograph) 

SHEPHERD  I.  FRANZ,  Govr.  HOSP.  FOR  INSANE  (Bullttin)  AND 
MADISON  BENTLEY,  UNIVERSITY  or  ILLINOIS  (Indtx) 

ADVISORY  EDITORS 

R.  P.  ANGIER,  YALE  UNIVERSITY;  MARY  W.  CALKINS,  WELLESLEY  COLLEGE  ;  H.  N. 
GARDINER,  SMITH  COLLEGE;  JOSEPH  JASTROW,  UNIVERSITY  OF  WISCONSIN;  C.  H. 
JUDD,  UNIVERSITY  OF  CHICAGO  ;  ADOLF  MEYER,  JOHNS  HOPKINS  UNIVEPSITY  ;  W.  B. 
PTLLSBURY,  UNIVERSITY  OF  MICHIGAN;  C.  E.  SEASHORE,  UNIVERSITY  OF  IOWA  ;  G.  M. 
STRATTON,  UNIVERSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA;  MARGARET  F.  WASHBURN,  VASSAR  COLLEGE. 


VOLUME  XXVII,   1920 


PUBLISHED    BI-UOMTHLT   BY 

PSYCHOLOGICAL  REVIEW  COMPANY 

41  NORTH  QUEEN  ST.,  LANCASTER,  PA, 
AMD  PRINCETON,  N.  J. 

f«l«i  »rl  M  ••rood  -riiMt  matter  July  13,  1897.  at  the  post-office  At  T  «nra«t«r,  P«u,  M<Ur 
Act  of  Congress  :rf  March  3.  1879 


P7 
I/.J-7 


PRESS  OF 

THE  NEW  ERA  PRINTING  COMPANY 
LANCASTER.  PA. 


CONTENTS  OF  VOLUME  XXVII 

January 

The  Absolute  Limits  of  Color  Sensitivity  and  the  Effect  of  Intensity  of  Light  on  the 

Apparent  Limits.     C.  E.  FERREE  and  GERTRUDE  RAND,  i. 
Some  Factors  in  the  Perception  of  Relative  Motion.    A  Preliminary  Experiment.    H. 

A.  CARR  and  M.  C.  HARDY,  24. 

A  New  Objective  Test  for  Verbal  Imagery  Types.    SAMUEL  D.  ROBBINS,  38. 
A  Functional  Interpretation  of  Human  Instincts.     J.  R.  KANTOR,  50. 
Immobility:    An    Inquiry    into    the    Mechanism    of    the    Fear    Reaction.      J.    P. 

M'GoNiGAL,  73. 

March 

Changes  in  Some  of  Our  Conceptions  and  Practices  of  Personnel.    WALTER  DILL 

SCOTT,  81. 

An  Analysis  of  Effort.    JOHN  J.  B.  MORGAN,  95. 
A  Comparison  of  Complete  versus  Alternate  Methods  of  Learning  Two  Habits.    J. 

F.  DA  SHI  ELL,  112. 

The  Tonal  Manifold.     R.  M.  OGDEN,  136. 
Is  Lack  of  Intelligence  the  Chief  Cause  of  Delinquency?    CURT  ROSENOW,  147. 

May 

Manifold  Sub-theories  of  "  The  Two  Factors."     C.  SPEARMAN,  159. 

General  versus  Group  Factors  in  Mental  Activities.     GODFREY  H.  THOMSON.  173. 

Suggestions  toward  a  Scientific  Interpretation  of  Perception.    J.  R.  KANTOR,  191. 

Instinct  and  Purpose.     EDWARD  CHACE  TOLMAN,  217. 

Brain  Mechanisms  and  Mental  Images.    S.  BENT  RUSSELL,  234. 

July 

The  Modification  of  Instinct  from  the  Standpoint  of  Social  Psychology.  WALTER  S. 
HUNTER,  274. 

The  Nature  of  the  Rhythm  Experience.    ELCANON  ISAACS,  270. 

A  New  Point  of  View  in  the  Interpretation  of  Threshold  Measurements  in  Psycho- 
physics.  GODFREY  H.  THOMSON,  300. 

The  Correlation  between  Interests  and  Abilities  in  College  Courses.  JAMES  W. 
BRIDGES  and  VERONA  M.  DOLLINGER,  308. 

Visual  Phenomena  in  the  Dreams  of  a  Blind  Subject.    RAYMOND  H.  WHEELER,  315. 

September 

The  Physical  Basis  of  Nerve  Functions.    LEONARD  THOMPSON  TROLAND,  323 
Theories  of  the  Will  and  Kinaesthetic  Sensations.    RAYMOND  H.  WHEELER,  351. 
A  Pursuit  Pendulum.    WALTER  R.  MILES,  361. 

The  Limits  of  Color  Sensitivity:  Effect  of  Biightness  of  Preexposure  and  Surround- 
ing Field.  C.  E.  FERREE  and  GERTRUDE  RAND,  377. 

iii 


IV 


CONTENTS 


November 

Do  We  Think  in  Words?    ARTHUR  S.  OTIS,  399. 

A  Behavioristic  Account  of  Sleep.    CHARLES  H.  WOOLBERT,  420. 

The  Compensatory  Function  of  Make-believe  Play.    EDWARD  S.  ROBINSON,  429. 

The  Control  of  Attitude  in  Psychophysical  Experiments.    EDWIN  G.  BORING,  440. 

The  Physical  Measurement  and  Specification  of  Color.  LOYD  A.  JONES  and  PRENTICE 
REEVES,  453. 

Suggestions  Looking  toward  a  Fundamental  Revision  of  Current  Statistical  Pro- 
cedure, as  Applied  to  Tests.  SYDNEY  L.  PRESSEY,  466. 


VOL.  27.  No.  i  January,  1920 


THE  PSYCHOLOGICAL  REVIEW 


BY  C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 
Bryn  Mawr  College 

INTRODUCTION 

In  describing  a  general  plan  of  investigating  the  chro- 
matic sensitivity  of  the  peripheral  retina  in  an  earlier  paper 
(1)  the  following  were  mentioned  as  two  of  the  problems 
which  we  wished  to  take  up:  (a)  a  point  to  point  determination 
of  comparative  sensitivities  to  the  different  colors  from  the 
center  to  the  periphery,  and  (b)  an  investigation  of  the  limits 
of  sensitivity.  The  former  of  these  problems  has  been  made 
the  subject  of  a  recent  paper  (2).  The  latter  will  be  treated 
of  here. 

The  investigation  of  the  limits  of  sensitivity  may  be 
considered  from  two  points  of  view.  As  indicated  in  the 
first  of  the  papers  referred  to  above,  (a)  it  may  be  made  a 
part  of  the  investigation  of  the  comparative  sensitivities  of 
the  peripheral  retina  to  the  different  colors;  and  (b)  it  may 
be  considered  more  specifically  in  relation  to  points  of  theory. 
In  the  former  case  the  limits  should  be  obtained  with  stimuli 
equalized  in  energy.  The  results  will  then  represent  positions 
on  the  retina  at  which  the  stimuli  for  one  of  the  intensities 
which  it  is  possible  to  employ  have  the  same  or  nearly  the 
same  threshold  value.1  In  the  latter  case  the  problem  con- 

1  Strictly  speaking  the  threshold  value  may  be  considerably  less  at  this  point 
than  the  intensity  of  the  stimulus  employed,  because  the  stimulus  may  be  increased 
much  above  the  threshold  value  in  the  far  periphery  of  the  retina  without  changing  the 
limits  by  a  detectable  amount.  That  is,  the  stimulus  value  of  the  just  noticeable 

I 


2  C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 

sidered  in  relation  to  its  historical  development  divides  into 
two, — a  determination  of  the  relative  or  apparent  limits  and  a 
determination  of  the  absolute  limits.  In  the  second  of  the 
papers  referred  to  above  it  was  shown  that  the  determination 
of  the  apparent  limits  was  given  an  undue  importance  in 
relation  to  theory  by  Hess  and  his  followers  because  of  their 
failure  to  realize  that  great  irregularity  and  not  uniformity 
characterizes  the  decrease  of  sensitivity  from  the  center  to 
the  periphery  of  the  retina.  The  details  of  that  demonstra- 
tion need  not  be  repeated  here.  The  determination  of  the 
absolute  limits  of  sensitivity,  however,  does  sustain  an  im- 
portant relation  to  theory,  especially  to  theories  of  the 
paired  process  type;  for  if  it  be  found  that  sensation  can 
be  aroused  farther  out  from  the  center  of  the  retina  for  one 
of  the  paired  colors  than  for  the  other,  that  fact  must  tell 
against  the  theory  unless  some  supplementary  concept  is 
provided  to  explain  the  discrepancy.  For  one  thing  we  have 
undertaken,  therefore,  to  determine  the  limits  of  sensitivity 
with  stimuli  any  further  increase  in  the  intensity  of  which 
tends  to  decrease  rather  than  to  increase  the  chromatic 
component  of  the  response.  For  another  we  have  determined 
the  effect  of  a  given  range  of  variation  of  intensities  on  the 
apparent  limits.  Our  reason  in  part  for  doing  this  was  to 
supplement  at  higher  intensities  the  work  of  former  papers  (3) 
in  which  we  called  attention  to  the  large  variations  that  are 
required  in  any  of  the  factors  influencing  the  chromatic 
response  (intensity  being  the  most  effective  of  these)  to 
change  the  limits  of  sensitivity  as  much  as  I  degree  especially 
when  a  certain  degree  of  excentricity  has  been  reached, 
pointing  out  in  particular  with  regard  to  the  work  of  previous 
writers,  (a)  the  importance  of  taking  into  account  deviations 
of  1-3  degrees  from  coincidence  of  limits  when  conclusions 
with  regard  /to  comparative  sensitivities  are  to  be  drawn 
from  the  results,  and  (b)  the  futility  of  making  a  brightness 
equalization  of  the  stimuli,  with  its  attendant  disadvantages, 

difference  in  limits  is  much  greater  than  the  stimulus  value  of  the  difference  limen  of 
intensity.  In  other  words,  a  given  point  in  the  peripheral  retina  may  be  considered 
the  limit  for  a  range  of  stimulus  intensities,  varying  in  magnitude  with  its  degree  of 
excentricity. 


ABSOLUTE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY  3 

for  the  determination  of  the  limits  with  lights  of  medium  and 
high  intensities  and  perhaps  for  any  but  intensities  so  low  as 
to  give  very  narrow  limits.  For  the  latter  point  three 
reasons  may  be  given,  (i)  The  brightness  equation  does 
not  equalize  the  stimuli  in  power  to  arouse  the  chromatic 
response,  the  only  subjective  equation,  so  far  as  we  can  see, 
that  could  rightly  be  given  a  place  in  a  determination  of  the 
limits  of  chromatic  sensitivity,  and  this  only  in  a  determina- 
tion of  whether  or  not  the  same  ratio  of  sensitivity  holds  for 
the  limits  as  for  the  center  or  other  point  at  which  the  equa- 
tion was  made.  (2)  It  does  not  equate  them  in  intensity 
(the  equation  is  merely  of  the  very  selective  achromatic 
response  to  the  stimuli).  And  (3)  so  far  as  the  effect  of  the 
achromatic  on  the  chromatic  component  of  the  excitation  is 
concerned  (the  final  variable  that  might  be  considered),  it 
has  already  been  shown  by  one  of  the  writers  in  a  previous 
paper  (4)  that  there  is  not  enough  of  this  effect  for  the  colors 
ordinarily  used  to  change  the  limits  by  a  detectable  amount. 
The  particular  bearing  of  the  present  work  on  this  question 
is  to  give  a  clearer  and  more  definite  idea  of  just  how  much 
difference  in  intensity  or  equivalent  influence  is  required  to 
change  the  limits  by  detectable  amounts  in  the  mid  and  far 
periphery  of  the  retina.  In  the  beginning  this  was  in  fact 
our  chief  incentive  to  undertake  the  work. 

THE  PROBLEM 

The  investigation  was  given  the  following  form,  (i)  An 
attempt  was  made  to  find  out  whether  by  means  of  our 
spectroscopic  apparatus,  which  was  designed  especially  to 
give  high  intensities  of  light,  stimuli  could  be  obtained  which 
could  be  sensed  as  color  to  the  limits  of  white  light  vision. 
(2)  The  effect  on  the  extension  of  the  limits  of  sensitivity  of 
varying  the  stimuli  through  quite  a  wide  range  of  intensities 
was  investigated.  And  (3)  the  determination  of  the  limits 
was  made  in  16  meridians  with  all  of  the  lights  made  equal 
in  energy  to  the  blue  of  the  prismatic  spectrum  employed 
and  with  1/32  of  this  amount  of  energy. 


4  C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 

CONDITIONS  UNDER  WHICH  THE  WORK  WAS  DONE 
The  conditions  under  which  the  work  was  done  fall 
under  five  headings:  (i)  the  wave-lengths  of  light  employed 
and  the  means  used  of  getting  greater  purity  of  light  than  is 
found  in  the  prismatic  spectrum;  (2)  the  energy  content  of 
the  stimuli  used  and  the  method  of  measurement;  (3)  the 
control  of  the  brightness  of  preexposure  and  surrounding 
field;  (4)  the  control  of  the  general  illumination  of  the  optics 
room;  and  (5)  the  method  of  rendering  the  amount  of  light 
entering  the  eye  independent  of  variations  in  the  size  of  the 
pupil,  without  the  use  of  an  artificial  pupil.  These  conditions 
are  so  nearly  identical  with  those  used  in  the  work  of  the 
immediately  preceding  papers  that  at  the  request  of  the 
Editor  space  has  not  been  taken  for  their  repetition  in  the 
present  paper.  For  a  description  of  the  conditions  the 
reader  is  referred  to  'Chromatic  Thresholds  of  Sensation 
and  their  Bearing  on  Color  Theory,  Part  I.,'  this  journal, 
1919,  26,  pp.  18-25. 

The  stimulus  used  was  the  circular  aperture  of  the  cam- 
pimeter,  15  mm.  in  diameter,  filled  with  light  by  the  focusing 
lens.  At  a  distance  of  25  cm.  from  the  pupil  of  the  eye,  on 
which  the  light  from  the  objective  slit  of  the  spectroscope  was 
focussed,  this  aperture  subtended  a  visual  angle  of  3°  26'.  The 
time  of  exposure  was  I  sec.  and  the  interval  between  exposures 
varied  between  3-5  min.  depending  on  circumstances  and 
the  need  for  precautionary  measures.  If  the  stimulus  was 
sensed  in  its  proper  color  at  any  time  during  the  I  sec.  in- 
terval of  exposure,  the  retina  was  called  color  sensitive  at 
that  point.  (At  the  limits  of  white  light  vision  the  red  stimu- 
lus, for  example,  of  the  intensity  used  was  sensed  as  a  tint  of 
red.)  The  field  in  the  16  meridians  was  always  mapped  for 
one  color  before  the  work  on  another  color  was  begun. 

Systematic  results  were  obtained  for  all  of  the  points  of 
the  work  for  only  one  observer.  This  was  the  observer 
whose  results  were  published  in  the  immediately  preceding 
papers:  'Chromatic  Thresholds,  etc.,  Parts  I.  and  II.'  For 
data  with  regard  to  the  various  ways  in  which  the  normality  of  • 
both  the  chromatic  and  achromatic  sensitivity  of  this  observer, 


ABSOLUTE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY  5 

central  retina,  and  chromatic  sensitivity,  peripheral  retina, 
has  been  confirmed,  the  reader  is  referred  to  pp.  26-32  of  the 
first  of  the  papers  noted  above.  Data  on  additional  points, 
important  in  a  general  specification  of  the  ocular  condition 
of  the  observer,  have  also  been  published  in  various  places: 
e.g.,  on  the  dioptric  or  refraction  condition  and  power  to 
sustain  acuity  in  Trans.  Ilium.  Eng.  Soc.y  1915,  10,  p.  1128, 
and  in  other  papers  by  us  on  lighting  in  relation  to  the  eye; 
on  muscle  strength,  muscle  balance,  muscle  lag,  photopic 
acuity,  near  point,  range  of  accommodation,  and  refraction 
condition  (more  recent),  Trans.  Amer.  Ophthal.  Sor.,  1918, 
66,  pp.  142-163;  and  on  scotopic  acuity  and  amount  and 
rapidity  of  scotopic  adaptation,  Trans.  Amer.  Ophthal.  Soc., 
1919,  67  (in  press).  The  more  important  points  such  as 
the  coincidence  of  the  limits  of  red,  yellow  and  blue  with 
the  limits  of  white  light  vision;  the  narrower  limits  for  green; 
the  interlacing  of  limits  for  stimuli  of  medium  intensity  of 
equal  energy,  or  of  the  same  general  order  of  intensity;  and 
the  large  differences  in  amount  of  light  required  to  change 
the  limits  of  sensitivity  by  a  detectable  amount  in  the  mid 
and  far  peripheral  portions  of  the  retina,  have  been  con- 
firmed in  a  less  detailed  and  systematic  way  by  one  or  more 
check  observers. 

RESULTS 

The  following  results  were  obtained,  (i)  It  was  quite 
easy  to  obtain  an  intensity  of  light  for  the  red,  yellow  and 
blue  wave-lengths  that  could  be  sensed  to  the  limits  of  white 
light  vision.  In  fact  these  wave-lengths  in  the  spectrum 
employed  were  considerably  above  the  threshold  at  the 
limits  of  white  light  vision  in  the  sixteen  meridians  investi- 
gated. The  limits  of  the  green  of  this  spectrum,  however, 
fell  far  short  of  the  limits  for  white  light;  nor  could  the  zone 
of  sensitivity  be  widened  as  much  as  I  degree  by  increasing 
the  current  in  the  Nernst  filament  from  0.6  to  O.8  ampere. 
The  energy  entering  the  eye  from  the  spectrum  of  the  Nernst 
filament  operated  by  0.6  ampere  of  current  with  the  width 
of  collimator  slit  employed  was  for  the  red  9096.639  x  io~10 


o  C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 

watt;  for  the  yellow,  4065.624  x  io~10  watt;  for  the  green, 
1562.388  xio~10  watt;  and  for  the  blue,  882.025  x  io~10  watt. 
The  energy  value  of  the  threshold  at  the  limits  of  white 
light  vision  in  the  nasal  meridian,  for  example,  was  for  the 
red  277.836  x  io~10  watt;  for  the  yellow,  268.95  x  IO~10  watt; 
and  for  the  blue,  264.368  x  io~10  watt.  The  intensity  of 
light  for  these  colors  in  the  0.6  ampere  spectrum  was,  there- 
fore, strongly  supra-liminal  at  the  limits  of  white  light 
vision,  as  is  stated  above.  In  the  0.6  ampere  spectrum, 
the  energy  of  the  green  light,  it  will  be  noted,  was  greater 
than  the  energy  of  the  blue,  but  less  than  the  energy  of  the 
red  and  yellow.  It  was,  however,  nearly  six  times  as  great 
as  the  threshold  value  of  these  colors  at  the  limits  of  white 
light  vision.  Moreover,  when  the  current  was  raised  to  0.8 
ampere  this  value  was  considerably  increased,  but  there 
was  still  no  detectable  extension  of  the  limits.  Since 
then  the  sensitivity  to  green  at  the  center  of  the  retina 
and  for  several  degrees  towards  the  periphery  is  approxi- 
mately the  same  as  to  blue  and  considerably  greater  than 
to  red  and  to  yellow,  and  since  so  large  an  increase  in  the 
energy  value  of  the  stimulus  made  no  detectable  difference 
in  the  limits  and  any  further  increase  lessened  rather  than 
increased  the  chromatic  component  of  the  response,  it  seems 
highly  improbable  that  the  limits  could  by  any  means  what- 
soever be  extended  the  20—35  degrees  needed  to  make  them 
coextensive  with  the  limits  of  white  light  vision.  It  seems 
fairly  certain,  therefore,  that  while  the  far  periphery  of  the 
retina  is  only  deficient  in  its  chromatic  sensitivity  to  red, 
yellow  and  blue,  the  blindness  to  green  for  the  observers  used 
is  absolute. 

(2)  In  the  investigation  of  the  effect  of  changes  of  in- 
tensity on  the  limits  of  sensitivity  eight  intensities  were 
used,  sustaining  to  each  other  the  following  relations:  I,  1/2, 
1/4,  1/8,  1/16,  1/32,  1/64  and  1/128.  The  highest  intensities 
were  taken  respectively  from  the  prismatic  spectrum  of  a 
Nernst  filament  operated  by  0.6  ampere  of  current  and 
from  a  spectrum  made  equal  in  energy  to  the  blue  of  this 
spectrum.  These  spectra  will  be  designated  as  Spectrum 


ABSOLUTE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY  7 

A  and  Spectrum  B.  The  reductions  were  produced  by  means 
of  an  aluminum  sectored  disc  of  180,  90,  45,  etc.,  degrees 
open  sector.  The  energy  values  of  the  different  intensities 
of  light,  as  has  already  been  stated,  were  obtained  by  radio- 
metering  the  highest  intensities  and  computing  the  lower 
from  the  simple  law  of  the  disc.  It  had  been  our  intention 
to  make  the  investigation  systematically  with  the  eight  dif- 
ferent intensities  in  the  sixteen  meridians  of  the  retina. 
However,  for  the  purpose  of  the  present  paper  a  briefer 
substitute  plan  has  been  adopted.  A  preliminary  investi- 
gation was  made  with  the  eight  intensities  of  Spectrum  A 
in  two  meridians  of  the  retina,  the  nasal  and  the  temporal, 
which  meridians  represent  opposite  extremes  with  regard  to 
breadth  of  zone  of  sensitivity,  in  order  to  get  some  idea  of 
the  amounts  of  reduction  that  would  be  needed  to  be  effective 
in  changing  the  limits.  It  was  found,  for  example,  that  a 
reduction  of  the  red  light  to  1/32  of  its  value  at  intensity  A 
was  not  sufficient  to  narrow  the  limits  in  the  nasal  and 
temporal  meridians,  the  meridians  designated  in  the  tables 
and  charts  as  90  degrees.  At  this  value  the  stimulus  was 
still  slightly  supra-liminal  in  these  meridians  at  the  limits  of 
white  light  vision.  This  amount  of  reduction,  however,  was 
sufficient  to  narrow  the  limits  for  the  other  stimuli  by  quite 
considerable  amounts.  Also  a  further  investigation  showed 
that  it  was  enough  to  narrow  the  limits  for  red  in  12  out  of 
the  16  meridians  employed.  It  was  decided,  therefore,  to 
make  the  final  determinations  in  the  16  meridians  with  the 
full  intensities  A  and  B  and  with  1/32  A  and  B.  The  amount 
of  narrowing  for  the  yellow  of  the  prismatic  spectrum  in  the 
different  meridians  produced  by  this  reduction  ranged  from 
3-11  degrees;  for  the  green  from  5-17  degrees;  for  the  blue, 
from  10-18  degrees;  and  for  the  red,  from  0-8  degrees.  For 
the  equal  energy  spectrum  the  amount  of  narrowing  for  the 
yellow  ranged  from  5-18  degrees;  for  the  green,  from  5-15 
degrees;  for  the  blue,  from  4-18  degrees;  and  for  the  red  from 
3-25  degrees. 

(3)  In  case  of  the  equal  energy  spectrum  of  the  higher 
intensity,  all  of  the  lights  with  the  exception  of  the  green 


C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 

were  seen  in  their  proper  color  to  the  limits  of  white  light 
vision  in  each  of  the  16  meridians.  Made  equal  in  energy 
to  the  blue  of  the  prismatic  spectrum  (882.025  x  io~10  watt) 
the  red  and  yellow  were  considerably  less  in  energy  value  than 
was  the  green  of  the  prismatic  spectrum,  still  the  red  and  yellow 
were  sensed  to  the  limits  of  white  light  vision  while  the  green 
which  represented  a  considerably  greater  amount  of  energy 
fell  short  of  those  limits  by  amounts  varying  from  20-35 
degrees  in  the  different  meridians.  There  can  be  no  reason- 
able doubt,  we  believe,  that  the  difference  found  here  repre- 
sents an  actual  difference  in  sensitivity.  It  obviously  can 
not  be  attributed  to  the  relative  intensities  of  the  stimuli 
employed. 

Landolt  has  also  investigated  the  effect  of  high  intensities 
on  the  extension  of  the  limits  of  sensitivity.  Writing  of  this 
work  (5),  he  says:  "In  ein  absolut  dunkles  Zimmer  fiel  nur 
durch  eine  kleine  Offnung  im  Finsterladen  directes  Sonnen- 
licht.  Dieses  wurde  auf  das  ausserste  Ende  des  Perimeter- 
bogens  gelenkt.  Wahrend  wir  unser  Auge  ins  Centrum  des 
Bogens  setzen,  bracht  man  in  die  kleine,  intensive  beleuchtete 
Stelle  farbige  Papiere  von  moglichster  Intensitat  der  Farbung. 
Nun  bewegtet  sich  das  Auge  langsam  vom  entgegengesetzen 
Ende  des  Bogens  nach  Scheitelpunkte  zu  und  es  zeigte  sich 
dabei,  dass  wenigstens  mit  der  innern  Netzhautpartie  alle 
Farben  schon  bei  90°  erkannt  wurden.  Die  Grosse  des 
Objectes  betrug  weniger  als  I  cm2. 

"Als  dieselben  Priifungen  auch  mit  Spectralfarben  zu 
machen,  entwarfen  wir  ein  Sonnenspectrum  im  sonst  dunkeln 
Zimmer  und  liessen  es  durch  eine  achromatische  Linse  auf 
einen  Ende  des  Perimeters  befindlichen  Schirm  fallen. 
Dieser  hatte  eine  verandliche  Spake,  mittelst  welcher  man 
die  einzelnen-  Farben  aus  dem  Spectrum  isolieren  konnte. 
Wahrend  wir  nun  wiederum  nach  langer  Adaptation,  und 
bei  verbundenem  zweiten  Auge  das  eine  Ende  des  Bogens 
fixierten,  wiirde  von  einem  Assistenten  irgendeine  Farbe  des 
Spectrums  auf  die  Spalte  gelenkt,  und  wir  drehten  nun, 
unter  stehter  Fixation  unserer  Fingerspitze,  welche  sich  auf 
dem  Bogen  bewegte,  das  Auge  allmahlig  der  Farbe  entgegen. 


ABSOLUTE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIHTY 


Es  zeigte  sich  auch  hier  wiederum  dass  alle  Farbe  schon  bei 
90°  erkannt  werden,  wenn  sie  intensiv  genug  sind." 

Landolt's  investigation  was  made,  it  will  be  noted,  in  a 
dark  room  while  ours  was  made  in  a  light  room.  We  have 

TABLE  I 

A.  THE  EFFECT  OF  INTENSITY  OF  STIMULUS  ON  THE  LIMITS  OF  SENSITIVITY, 

PRISMATIC  SPECTRUM 

In  this  table  are  given  the  results  of  a  preliminary  investigation  in  two  representa- 
tive meridians  to  show  how  much  reduction  is  needed  to  produce  a  significant  change 
in  the  limits  of  sensitivity.  Eight  intensities  of  stimulus  were  used:  A,  I/2A,  I/4A. 
1/8 A,  etc. 


Meridian  Investi- 
gated 

Stimulus 

Limits  of  Sensitivity  for 

Inten- 
sity 
A 

Inten- 
sity 
JA 

Inten- 
sity 
JA 

Inten- 
sity 
*A 

Inten- 
sity 

AA 

Inten- 

SP 

Inten- 
sity 
AA 

Inten- 
sity 
i*iA 

Nasal  

Red 

(670  MM) 

92 

92 

92 

92 

92 

92 

88 

86 

Yellow 

(581  MM) 

92 

92 

92 

92 

91 

89 

88 

88 

Green 

(522  MM) 

69 

69 

69 

66 

63 

62 

59 

56 

Blue 

(468  MM) 

92 

92 

87 

83 

79 

78 

77 

76 

Temporal  

Red 

(670  MM) 

61 

61 

6l 

61 

61 

61 

46 

44 

Yellow 

(581  MM) 

61 

61 

61 

61 

55 

47 

46 

45 

Green 

(522  MM) 

45 

45 

45 

42 

34-5 

32.5 

30 

29 

Blue 

(468  MM) 

61 

61 

56 

45 

43-5 

43 

43 

43 

B.  THE  ENERGY  VALUES  OF  THE  STIMULI  USED 

Total  energy  of  light  at  campimeter  opening  and  at  eye 

(watt  X  10-'°) 


Intensity 

Red  (670/1/1) 

Yellow  (sSiw.) 

Green  (saaMM) 

Blue  (468,1,,) 

A» 

9096.639 

4065.624 

1562.388 

882.025 

1  The  energy  values  of  1/2,  1/4,  1/8,  1/16,  1/32,  1/64  and  1/128  A  may  be  obtained 
by  dividing  the  above  values  by  the  appropriate  factor. 

The  energy  density  at  the  campimeter  opening  (watt  per  sq.  mm.)  may  be  ob- 
tained by  multiplying  the  above  values  by  0.005659;  the  energy  density  at  the  eye, 
by  multiplying  them  by  0.303. 

not  as  yet  had  opportunity  to  repeat  the  work  of  the  present 
paper  with  the  dark  adapted  eye.  However,  determinations 
somewhat  rougher  and  less  detailed  than  those  described 


10  C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 

here  have  sufficed  to  show  that  for  our  observers  the  far  per- 
iphery of  the  retina  is  color-blind  to  green  also  with  the  dark 
adapted  eye.  With  reference  to  the  relative  insensitivity 
of  the  peripheral  retina  to  green,  it  may  further  be  noted 
that  in  our  results  with  the  Hering  papers  with  a  different 
set  of  observers  the  limits  for  green  fell  much  nearer  to  the 
center  of  the  retina  than  for  red,  yellow  and  blue.  The 
results  represented  in  Fig.  5,  for  example,  were  taken  from 
this  series  of  observations.  That  the  limits  for  green  are 
narrower  than  for  red,  yellow  and  blue  with  stimuli  of  the 
same  order  of  intensity  has,  moreover,  been  verified  many 
times  in  the  work  of  our  undergraduate  laboratory. 

In  Table  I.,  A,  are  given  the  results  of  the  preliminary 
investigation  in  the  nasal  and  temporal  meridians  to  find 
out  whether  an  intensity  of  light  may  not  be  gotten  sufficiently 
high  to  make  the  limits  of  color  sensitivity  coincide  with  the 
limits  of  white  light  vision,  and  once  this  intensity  is  attained 
how  much  reduction  is  needed  to  produce  a  significant 
narrowing  of  the  limits.  We  have  already  indicated  in  this 
and  in  previous  papers  the  large  changes  of  intensity  that 
are  needed  to  change  the  limits  by  a  significant  amount  when 
a  certain  degree  of  excentricity  has  been  reached.  How  very 
large  these  changes  have  to  be  for  the  far  periphery  of  the 
retina  is  shown  in  this  table. 

In  Table  I.,  B,  is  given  a  specification  of  the  energy  values 
of  the  stimuli  used  in  making  the  determinations  represented 
in  Table  I.,  A.  Four  energy  values  may  perhaps  be  consid- 
ered of  importance  for  each  determination:  The  total  value 
at  the  campimeter  opening,  the  density  per  sq.  mm.  at  the 
campimeter  opening,  the  total  energy  entering  the  eye,  and 
the  density  per  sq.  mm.  at  the  eye.  For  the  sake  of  brevity, 
however,  only  qne  of  these  values  is  given  in  the  table, 
namely,  the  total  energy  entering  the  eye;  and  the  factors 
needed  to  convert  this  value  into  density  at  the  eye  and  at 
the  campimeter  opening  are  appended  in  a  footnote.  Since 
all  of  the  light  from  the  campimeter  opening  is  focused  into 
the  image  on  the  pupil,  the  figures  expressing  the  total  energy 
at  the  eye  and  at  the  campimeter  opening  are  the  same. 


ABSOLUTE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY 


II 


The  most  important  of  the  four  specifications  noted  are 
probably  the  total  amount  of  light  entering  the  eye  and  the 
density  at  the  campimeter  opening.  The  latter  value,  for 
example,  sustains  a  fixed  but  unknown  ratio  to  the  density 
of  the  image  formed  on  the  retina. 

TABLE  II 

THE  BRIGHTNESS  VALUES  OF  PREEXPOSURE  AND  SURROUNDING  FIELD 

In  this  table  are  given  the  brightness  values  of  preexposure  and  campimeter 
screen  in  candlepower  per  square  inch1  for  the  determination  of  limits  given  in  Table  I. 
In  all  cases  in  which  it  was  possible  the  brightness  of  the  preexposure  and  campimeter 
screen  was  made  equal  to  that  of  the  stimulus  at  the  limits  of  sensitivity. 


Meridian 

Stimulus 

Brightness  Value  of  Preexposure  and  Campimeter  Screen  for 

Intensity 

A 

Intensity 
JA 

Intensity 
JA 

Intensity 
»A 

Intensity 
AA 

Intensity 

AA 

Intensity 

AA 

Intensity 
i».A 

Nasal  

Red 

(670  MA*) 

O.O5O88 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.03093 

3.O2II6 

Yellow 

(581  MM) 

O.OJOSS 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.03663 

3.02686 

Green 

(522  MM) 

O.05O88 

O.05088 

O.O5O88 

0.03663 

0.03663 

O.O2686 

0.02II6 

0.01384 

Blue 

(468  MM) 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.03663 

0.02686 

0.01262 

0.01140 

0.00643 

0.00578 

Temporal 

Red 

(670  MM) 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.05088 

3.03093 

O.OI79I 

Yellow 

(58  1  MM) 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.02686 

0.02116 

Green 

(522  MM) 

O.O5O88 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.03663 

O.O2686 

0.01384 

O.OII4O 

0.01140 

Blue 

(468  MM) 

0.05088 

0.05088 

0.03663 

0.03093 

0.01262 

0.01140 

0.00716 

0.00643 

In  Table  II.  are  given  the  brightness  values  of  the  pre- 
exposure and  campimeter  screen  for  the  work  represented  in 
Table  I.  As  stated  earlier  in  the  paper  the  preexposure  and 
the  campimeter  screen  were  selected  from  the  Hering  series 
of  standard  papers.  In  case  of  the  higher  intensities  of  light 
used,  No.  I  of  this  series  (the  standard  white,  coefficient  of 
reflection  about  75  per  cent.)  reflecting  the  light  of  the  room 
was  not  as  bright  as  the  stimulus  light.  These  cases  may  be 
identified  in  this  and  the  following  tables  by  the  brightness 
value  of  this  paper  under  the  illumination  of  the  room,  namely, 
0.05088  cp.  per  sq.  in. 

1  The  above  values  may  be  converted  into  millilamberts  by  multiplying  by  486.8. 


12 


C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 


In  Table  III.  are  given  the  limits  of  sensitivity  in  16 
meridians  of  the  retina  for  the  highest  intensity  of  light  used 
for  the  work  of  Table  I.,  intensity  A,  and  for  1/32  A,  an 
intensity  representing  the  order  of  reduction  needed  for  all 
of  the  colors  to  produce  any  considerable  narrowing  of  the 

TABLE  III 

THE  EFFECT  OF  INTENSITY  OF  STIMULUS  ON  THE  LIMITS  OF  SENSITIVITY,  PRISMATIC 

SPECTRUM 

In  this  table  are  given  the  limits  of  sensitivity  in  16  meridians  of  the  retina  for 
intensity  A  and  1/3 2A  of  Table  II.  The  upper  vertical  meridian  is  numbered  o° 
and  the  lower  vertical  180°.  Reading  down  to  right  or  left  they  are  25°,  45°,  70°, 
90°,  110°,  135°,  155°,  and  180°. 


Limits  of  Sensitivity  for 

Meridian  Investi- 

Intensity A 

Intensity  ^SA 

gated 

Red 

Yellow 

Green 

Blue 

Red 

Yellow 

Green 

Blue 

(6yoMM) 

(58iMM) 

(522/1/1) 

(468/1/0 

(670/1/0 

(581/1/0 

(5221111) 

(468/iM) 

0° 

65 

65 

36 

65 

64 

57 

29 

5° 

Nasal          25° 

86 

86 

49 

86 

83 

79 

36 

72 

45° 

90 

90 

52 

90 

89 

81 

38 

76 

70° 

92 

92 

67 

92 

92 

86 

59 

77 

90° 

92 

92 

69 

92 

92 

89 

62 

78 

110° 

9i 

9i 

68 

9i 

90 

87 

59 

78 

135° 

88 

88 

61 

88 

87 

84 

49 

75 

155° 

86 

86 

47 

86 

84 

78 

35 

67 

1  80° 

57 

57 

36 

57 

53 

47 

27 

42 

Temporal    25° 

65 

65 

44 

65 

64 

SS 

31 

52 

45° 

6S 

65 

SO 

65 

57 

56 

33 

Si 

70° 

62 

•  62 

46 

62 

SS 

50 

35 

44 

90° 

61 

61 

45 

61 

61 

47 

32-5 

43 

110° 

58 

58 

37 

58 

57 

49 

3i 

48 

135° 

55 

55 

32 

55 

55 

48 

27 

20 

155° 

54 

54 

30 

64 

5° 

43' 

25 

41 

limits  at  the  extreme  periphery  of  the  retina.  The  16 
meridians  used  are  designated  as  follows.  The  upper  vertical 
meridian  is  marked  o  and  the  lower  vertical  180  degrees. 
Beginning  with  o  and  reading  down  to  left  or  right  they  are 
o,  25,  45,  75,  9p,  no,  135  and  180  degrees.  The  specification 
of  the  energy  of  the  stimuli  at  intensity  A  and  1/32  A  is 
given,  it  will  be  noted,  in  Table  I.,  B.  For  all  of  the  stimuli 
at  intensity  A,  No.  I  of  the  Hering  series  of  papers  was  used 
as  preexposure  and  campimeter  screen,  as  has  already  been 
noted.  This  paper  illuminated  by  the  light  of  the  room  was  too 
dark  (0.05088  cp.  per  sq.  in.)  for  all  of  the  four  colors  at  the 


ABSOLUTE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY 


»3 


limits  of  sensitivity.  However,  for  the  want  of  a  suitable 
pigment  surface  of  higher  reflection  coefficient  it  was  used. 
For  intensity  1/32  A,  it  was  darker  than  the  yellow  stimulus 

TABLE  IV 

A.  THE  EFFECT  OF  INTENSITY  OF  STIMULUS  ON  THE  LIMITS  OF  SENSITIVITY,  EQUAL 

ENERGY  SPECTRUM 

In  this  table  are  given  the  limits  of  sensitivity  in  16  meridians  of  the  retina  for 
stimuli  all  made  approximately  equal  in  energy  to  the  blue  of  the  prismatic  spectrum 
used  in  Table  I.,  and  for  1/32  of  this  intensity, — intensity  B  and  1/32  B. 


Limits  of  Sensitivity  for 

Meridian  Investi- 
•?  atcd 

Intensity  B 

Intensity  ^B 

Red 

Yellow 

Green 

Blue 

Red 

Yellow 

Green 

Blue 

(6/OMM) 

(58IMM) 

(S«MM) 

U68MM) 

(670^/1) 

(58lMM) 

(5"MM) 

<4«W) 

0° 

65 

65 

34 

65 

62 

56 

29 

50 

Nasal          25° 

86 

86 

47 

86 

74 

70 

34 

72 

45° 

90 

90 

SO 

90 

74 

78 

36 

76 

70° 

92 

92 

63 

92 

78 

85 

SO 

77 

90° 

92 

92 

69 

92 

81 

87 

59 

78 

110° 

91 

91 

64 

91 

79 

85 

58 

78 

i3S° 
iS5° 

88 
86 

88 
86 

8 

88 
86 

It 

80 
74 

42 
32 

I5 
67 

1  80° 

57 

57 

31 

57 

46 

39 

25 

42 

Temporal    25° 

65 

65 

39 

65 

57 

54 

30 

52 

45° 

65 

65 

39 

65 

47 

55 

32 

51 

70° 

62 

62 

42 

62 

46 

48 

30 

44 

90° 

61 

61 

41 

61 

40 

45 

30 

43 

110° 

58 

58 

36 

58 

45 

45 

29 

48 

135° 

SS 

55 

28 

SS 

49 

41 

25 

40 

155° 

54 

54 

26 

54 

47 

38 

24 

B.  THE  ENERGY  VALUES  OF  THE  STIMULI  USED. 

Total  energy  of  light  at  campimeter  and  at  eye 

(watt   X  icr10) 


Intensity 

Red  (670  fifi) 

Yellow  (581  w.) 

Green  (5221  /»M) 

Blue  (468  MM) 

B1 

891.050 

882.510 

884.946 

882.025 

and  approximately  equal  to  the  green  and  red.  For  the  blue 
stimulus  Nos.  9-14  of  the  Hering  series  (0.01404-0.0114  cp. 
per  sq.  in.)  were  used  as  needed  in  the  different  meridians. 
The  photometric  values  for  these  intensities  and  intensity 

1  The  energy  value  of  1/32  B  may  be  obtained  by  dividing  the  above  values  by 
the  appropriate  factor. 

The  energy  density  at  the  campimeter  opening  (watt  per  sq.  mm.)  may  be  ob- 
tained by  multiplying  the  above  values  by  0.005659;  the  energy  density  at  the  eye, 
by  multiplying  them  by  0.303. 


C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GRETRUDE  RAND 


B  and  1/32  B  have  not  been  given  in  detailed  tabular  form 
because  of  the  large  number  of  repetitions  that  occur. 

In  Table  IV.,  A,  are  given  the  limits  of  sensitivity  in 
16  meridians  of  the  retina  for  the  four  stimuli  all  made  equal 
in  energy  to  the  blue  used  in  Table  I.  and  for  1/32  of  this  value. 
These  values  are,  as  we  have  already  indicated,  designated  in 


70 


7C 


155 


155 


FIG.  i.  The  effect  of  intensity  of  stimulus  on  the  limits  of  sensitivity,  prismatic 
spectrum.  In  this  chart  are  represented  the  limits  of  sensitivity  for  intensity  A  of 
Table  I.:  red  9096.639,  yellow  4065.624,  green  1562.388,  and  blue  882.025  watt  X  io~10. 

the  table  as  intensity  B  and  1/32  B.  In  Table  IV.,  B,  are 
given  the  energy  values  of  the  stimuli  used  for  Table  IV.,  A. 
For  the  higher  intensity  of  these  stimuli,  intensity  B,  No.  I 
of  the  Hering  series  of  papers  (0.05088  cp.  per  sq.  in.)  was 
used  for  the  preexposure  and  campimeter  screen.  Again  it 
was  darker  than  all  of  the  four  colors  at  the  limits  of  sensitivity. 
For  intensity  1/32  B  it  was  slightly  darker  than  the  yellow. 


ABSOLUTE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY  »5 

For  the  green  of  this  intensity  the  no.  2  gray  of  this  series  was 
used  (0.0366  cp.  per  sq.  in.);  for  the  red  nos.  10-14  (0.01384- 
0.0114  cp.  per  sq.  in.)  varying  for  the  different  meridians; 
and  for  the  blue,  nos.  7-14  (0.01791-0.0114  cp.  per  sq.  in.). 

A  graphic  representation  of  the  results  of  Table  III.  is 
given  in  Figs.  I  and  2.     In  Fig.  I  are  shown  the  limits  of 


•45 


/O 


133 


160 


FIG.  2.  The  effect  of  intensity  of  stimulus  on  the  limits  of  sensitivity,  prismatic 
spectrum.  In  this  chart  are  represented  the  limits  of  sensitivity  for  intensity  1/32  A 
of  Table  I.:  red  284.27,  yellow  127.051,  green  48.825,  and  blue  27.563  watt  X  io~10 

sensitivity  to  the  four  stimuli  in  the  16  meridians  for  the  inten- 
sities represented  in  the  prismatic  spectrum  A.  The  limits 
for  the  red,  yellow  and  blue  stimuli  at  this  intensity  are, 
it  will  be  remembered,  coincident  with  the  limits  of  white 
light  vision.  All  four  limits  may  be  represented,  therefore, 
by  a  single  tracing,  an  unbroken  line  in  black.  The  limits  for 
green  are  represented  by  a  broken  line.  In  Fig.  2  are 


i6 


C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 


represented  the  limits  of  sensitivity  for  the  four  stimuli  at 
the  intensities  represented  in  the  prismatic  spectrum,  1/32  A. 
In  this  case  the  zone  of  sensitivity  to  blue  is  outlined  by  an 
unbroken  line  and  the  zones  for  the  other  colors  by  broken 
lines  as  indicated  in  the  figure.  An  inspection  of  this  figure 
will  show  that  the  degree  of  excentricity  of  the  limits  is  in  the 
order  of  the  intensity  of  the  stimuli.  In  discussing  the 


70 


135 


155 


IS5 


FIG.  3.  The  effect  of  intensity  of  stimulus  on  the  limits  of  sensitivity,  equal 
energy  spectrum.  In  this  chart  are  represented  the  limits  of  sensitivity  for  intensity 
B  of  Table  IV.:  red  891.05,  yellow  882.51,  green  884.946  and  blue  882.025  watt  X  lO"10. 

significance  of  *he  crisscrossing  or  interlacing  of  the  limits 
obtained  with  the  Hering  pigment  papers  in  previous  work, 
this  is  what  was  pointed  out  would  occur  if  there  were  a 
significant  difference  in  the  intensity  of  the  stimuli.  That  is, 
if  the  zone  of  sensitivity  to  red,  for  example,  is  in  one  meridian 
wider  and  in  another  narrower  than  to  green,  etc.,  it  can  not 


ABSOLUTE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY 


'7 


be  due  to  any  difference  in  the  intensity  of  the  stimuli;  for 
such  a  difference,  if  significant,  would  make  one  zone  con- 
sistently wider  or  narrower  than  the  other  in  all  meridians. 

A  graphic  representation  of  the  results  of  Table  IV.  is 
given  in  Figs.  3  and  4.  In  Fig.  3  are  shown  the  limits  of 
sensitivity  to  the  four  stimuli  in  the  16  meridians  for  the 
intensities  represented  in  the  equal  energy  spectrum  B. 


•45 


no 


155 


ISO 


FIG.  4.  The  effect  of  intensity  of  stimulus  on  the  limits  of  sensitivity,  equal  energy 
spectrum.  In  this  table  are  represented  the  limits  of  sensitivity  for  intensity  1/32  B 
of  Table  IV.:  red  27.845,  yellow  27.578,  green  27.655,  and  blue  27.563  watt  X  io~10. 

Again  the  limits  for  the  red,  yellow  and  blue  stimuli  coincide 
with  the  limits  of  white  light  vision  and  are  represented  by  a 
single  tracing,  the  unbroken  line  in  black.  The  limits  for 
green  are  represented  by  a  broken  line.  In  Fig.  4  are  shown 
the  limits  for  the  four  stimuli  at  the  intensities  represented 
in  the  equal  energy  spectrum  1/32  B.  With  regard  to  this 


i8 


C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 


figure  the  following  points  may  be  noted,  (i)  With  stimuli 
of  equal  energy  the  limits  of  no  one  of  the  colors,  red,  yellow 
and  blue,  are  consistently  wider  than  the  others.  That  is, 
their  limits  are  characterized  by  frequent  crisscrossing  or 
interlacing.  The  limits  for  all  three  colors,  however,  are 
consistently  wider  than  for  green.  And  (2)  Fig.  4  sustains  a 


45 


70 


.1C 


135 


•55 


155 


FIG.  5.     The  limits  of  sensitivity  to  red,  yellow,  green  and  blue  of  the  Hering 
series  of  pigment  papers,  intensity  of  illumination,  vertical  component,  390  foot-candles. 

somewhat  striking  general  similarity  to  the  charts  obtained 
for  the  Hering  pigment  papers.  One  of  these  showing  the 
limits  with  a  surrounding  field  and  preexposure  of  the  bright- 
ness of  the  colors  employed  is  given  in  Fig.  5.  While  no 
conclusion  can  be  drawn  from  this  similarity  with  regard  to 
the  relative  energies  of  the  wave-lengths  dominantly  reflected 
by  these  papers;  still  it  suggests  that  they  may  all,  roughly 
speaking,  be  somewhere  near  the  same  order  of  value,  at 


.IDSOLUTE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY  19 

least  much  more  nearly  so  than  are  these  colors  in  the  pris- 
matic spectrum.  The  red,  yellow,  green  and  blue  of  the 
prismatic  spectrum  gave,  it  will  be  remembered,  rather 
widely  concentric,  not  crisscrossing  limits. 

In  this  general  connection  it  may  be  of  interest  also  to 
note  the  close  correlation  which  obtains  between  the  results 
of  this  investigation  and  those  of  the  previous  investigation 
of  the  sensitivity  of  the  peripheral  retina  by  the  threshold 
method.  That  is,  wherever  the  thresholds  are  found  to  be 
low  the  limits  are  found  to  be  wide,  and  conversely  wherever 
the  thresholds  are  high  the  limits  are  found  to  be  corre- 
spondingly narrow.  Some  interesting  results  follow  from 
this.  For  example,  in  a  given  meridian  the  threshold  curve 
for  a  given  color  is  found  to  be  very  irregular,  rising  in  some 
places  slowly,  in  others  quickly,  and  still  in  others  dropping 
and  rising  again.  These  fluctuations  in  the  curve  are, 
moreover,  different  in  the  different  meridians.  This  means, 
of  course,  that  the  shape  of  the  zones  of  sensitivity  for  this 
color  should  change  with  the  intensity  of  the  stimulus  em- 
ployed, which  is  found  to  be  the  case.  Furthermore,  in  the 
same  meridian  the  threshold  curves  for  the  different  colors 
differ  from  each  other  widely  in  the  direction  and  amount  of 
the  irregularity:  and  this  difference  in  ~turn  varies  from 
meridian  to  meridian.  The  result  of  this  is  that  a  crisscrossing 
or  interlacing  of  limits  must  take  place  whenever  stimuli  of 
such  relative  intensities  are  used  that  the  limits  are  of  the 
same  general  order  of  excentricity.  In  other  words,  as  was 
pointed  out  in  our  discussion  of  this  phenomenon  in  earlier 
papers,  crisscrossing  can  mean  only  that  there-  is  a  lack  of 
uniformity  in  the  relative  sensitivity  to  the  different  colors  in 
the  different  meridians.  For  example,  when  it  occurs  in  the 
limits  for  blue  and  yellow,  it  indicates  that  the  ratio  of  sen- 
sitivity to  blue  and  yellow  changes  in  passing  from  meridian 
to  meridian.  In  short  any  investigation  at  all  comprehensive 
either  of  the  thresholds  or  limits  of  sensitivity  shows  that 
striking  irregularity  and  not  uniformity  characterizes  the 
distribution  of  chromatic  sensitivity  in  the  peripheral  retina. 
This  is  in  direct  opposition,  it  will  be  remembered,  to  the 


20  c.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 

claim  made  by  Hess  (6)  that  constancy  of  ratio  of  sensitivity 
to  the  paired  colors  prevails  throughout  the  retina  which 
claim,  it  will  be  remembered,  was  advanced  by  Hering  (7)  in 
support  of  his  own  theory  and  in  refutation  of  Pick's  (8) 
and  Leber's  (9)  modifications  of  the  Helmholtz  theory  to 
explain  the  color  blindness  of  the  peripheral  retina.  So  far 
as  we  are  able  to  determine  no  one  intensity  or  set  of  conditions 
will  give  coincidence  of  limits  in  all  meridians  for  any  two 
colors  inside  the  limits  of  white  light  vision. 

In  conclusion  it  may  not  be  out  of  place  to  point  out  the 
bearing  of  these  results  on  the  work  of  the  clinic.  In  the  prac- 
tice of  perimetryas  applied  to  diagnosis  it  is  commonly  accepted 
that  the  field  of  vision  for  the  normal  eye  may  be  divided  con- 
centrically from  periphery  to  center  in  the  following  order : 
white  light  and  form,  blue,  red  and  green.  It  is  obvious  from 
the  fore-going  results  (a)  with  stimuli  taken  from  the  prismatic 
and  equal  energy  spectra  and  (b]  from  the  effects  obtained  by 
varying  the  intensity  of  the  stimuli  that  the  responsibility  for 
such  a  rating  of  the  color  fields  rests  for  the  greater  part  with 
the  relative  intensities  of  the  pigment  stimuli  used  in  the 
work  of  the  clinic.  That  is,  the  limits  of  sensitivity  to 
red,  yellow,  blue  and  white  light  for  stimuli  of  high  intensities 
are  coincident;  for  stimuli  of  lower  intensities  taken  from  the 
prismatic  spectrum  they  are  rather  widely  concentric;  and 
for  stimuli  of  equal  energies  of  the  order  of  intensity  of 
27.563  x  io~10  watt  they  are  interlacing. 

Another  feature  of  interest  is  the  claim  that  has  been 
made  by  certain  clinicians,  but  not  generally  accepted,  we 
believe,  that  the  interlacing  of  the  limits  for  blue  and  red 
indicates  a  pathological  disturbance  in  the  relative  distribu- 
tion of  sensitivities.  While  we  are  not  disposed  to  dispute 
this  conclusion  because  of  a  too  meager  knowledge  of  all  of 
the  data  that  should  be  taken  into  consideration  in  its  evalu- 
ation, still  we  do  think  it  fair  to  note  that  pathological 
disturbances  are  only  one  set  of  factors  that  may  contribute 
to  such  a  result  and  that  widely  different  results  may  be 
gotten  with  the  same  eye  with  no  greater  differences  in  the 
test  conditions  than  may  occur  from  time  to  time  in  the  same 


ABSOLUTE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY  *i 

clinic  or  laboratory  unless  a  clear  understanding  is  had  of 
the  factors  which  affect  the  apparent  powers  of  response  of 
the  peripheral  retina  and  adequate  means  are  exercised  for 
their  control.  These  factors  are,  so  far  as  we  are  able  to  list 
them,  composition,  area,  intensity  of  the  stimulus  and  dura- 
tion of  the  stimulation,  breadth  of  pupil,  the  intensity  of  the 
general  illumination  and  the  state  of  adaptation  of  the  retina, 
and  the  brightness  of  the  preexposure  and  surrounding  field. 
Obviously  if  the  determination  of  the  apparent  limits  is  to 
be  given  clinical  significance  the  work  should  be  done  under 
conditions  of  work  which  have  been  most  carefully  standard- 
ized, for  the  apparent  limits  are  a  resultant  of  these  conditions 
as  well  as  of  the  actual  distribution  of  sensitivities. 

The  degree  of  importance  that  is  attributed  by  at  least 
one  clinician  to  the  absolute  and  relative  distribution  of 
sensitivities  over  the  retina  may  be  indicated  by  the  following 
quotation  from  a  recent  work  on  perimetry.  "Contraction 
of  the  form  fields  shows  the  degree  of  disease  of  the  visual 
tract.  It  is  better  evidence  of  the  real  condition  of  the 
visual  path  than  an  ophthalmoscopic  study  can  possibly 
furnish.  The  evidence  is  minute  and  analytical.  The  color 
fields  and  color  changes  moreover  furnish  a  more  delicate  test 
in  the  early  stages  of  the  disease  and  at  times  furnish  a  clue 
to  the  seat  of  the  trouble  before  an  appreciable  change  has 
taken  place  in  the  form  field"  (10). 

SUMMARY  OF  RESULTS  AND  CONCLUSIONS 
The  more  significant  features  of  the  above  results  may  be 
summarized  briefly  as  follows: 

1.  The  far  periphery  of  the  retina  is  not  blind  to  red, 
blue   and   yellow.     It  is   merely  deficient  in   sensitivity  to 
these  colors.     That  is,  with  stimuli  of  sufficient  intensity 
the  limits  of  red,  blue  and  yellow  coincide  with  the  limits  of 
white  light  vision.     The  blindness  to  green,  however,  is  for 
our  observers  absolute. 

2.  The  amount  of  change  of  intensity  required  to  produce 
a  detectable  change  in  the  apparent  limits  of  sensitivity  in 
the  more  remote  parts  of  the  retina  is  very  great.     This 


22  c.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 

amount  changes  very  irregularly  from  center  to  periphery  of 
the  retina  in  a  given  meridian  and  from  meridian  to  meridian 
as  might  be  expected  from  the  great  irregularity  in  the 
distribution  of  sensitivity  in  the  peripheral  retina.  (Cf. 
'Chromatic  Thresholds  of  Sensitivity  from  Center  to  Peri- 
phery of  the  Retina  and  their  Bearing  on  Color  Theory/ 
PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1919,  26,  pp.  16-42.) 

3.  Two  other  important  phenomena  may  also  be  men- 
tioned as  a  result  of  this  irregularity,     (a)  The  shape  of  the 
zone  of  sensitivity  to  a  given  color  changes  with  the  intensity 
of   the    stimulus    employed    in    making    the    determination. 
And  (b)  when  stimuli  of  equal  or  of  the  same  order  of  intensity 
are  used  the  limits  for  red,  yellow  and  blue  are  found  to 
interlace  or  crisscross  each  other  irregularly  rather  than  to 
coincide  in  complementary  pairs  as  was  reported  by  Hegg, 
Hess  and  Baird  in  a  more  limited  investigation  of  the  retina's 
powers  of  response.     The  former  phenomenon  is  the  direct 
corollary  of  the  difference  in  the  rate  of  decrease  of  sensitivity 
to  a  given  color  in  passing  from  the  center  to  the  periphery 
of  the  retina  in  the  different  meridians;  the  latter,  to  the 
change  in  the  ratio  of  sensitivity  to  the  different  colors  from 
meridian  to  meridian.     The  lack  of  uniformity  of  grading 
of  function  from  point  to  point  in  the  periphery  of  the  retina, 
reported   in   this   and   previous   papers,   while   striking,  can 
scarcely  be  considered  as  surprising.     It  is  in  fact  just  what 
might  be  expected  of  those  parts  of  a  sense  organ  which  are 
little  used  and  poorly  developed. 

4.  The    responsibility   of   the    accepted    clinic    rating   of 
limits  in  the  order  from  widest  to  narrowest  of  blue,  red  and 
green  doubtless  for  the  greater  part  rests  with  the  relative 
intensities  of  the  pigment  stimuli  used  in  the  work  of  the 
clinic.     With   stimuli  of  high  intensity  the  limits   for  red, 
yellow  and  blue  coincide  with  the  limits  of  white  light  vision; 
for  stimuli  of  lower  intensities,   taken  from   the  prismatic 
spectrum,  they  are  rather  widely  concentric;  and  for  stimuli 
of  equal  energies  of  medium  intensities  they  are  interlacing. 

5.  The  interlacing  of  limits  for  red  and  blue  is  a  normal 
result  for  stimuli  of  equal  energy  of  medium  intensities.     It 


ABSOLUTE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY  »3 

may  not  therefore  be  due  to  pathological  disturbances  in  the 
distribution  of  sensitivities  as  has  been  claimed  by  certain 
clinicians.  In  all  responsible  work  on  the  determination  of 
the  apparent  limits  it  is  obviously  of  great  importance  to 
bear  in  mind  that  the  results  are  dependent  both  upon  the 
actual  distribution  of  sensitivity  and  the  numerous  factors 
which  affect  the  apparent  powers  of  response  of  the  peripheral 
retina. 

BIBLIOGRAPHY 

1.  FERREE,  C.  E.,  AND  RAND,  G.    A  Note  on  the  Determination  of  the  Retina's 

Sensitivity  to  Colored  Light  in  Terms  of  Radiometric  Units.     Amer.  Jour,  of 
Psych.,  1912,  23,  pp.  328-332. 

2.  FERREE,  C.  E.,  AND  RAND,  G.     Chromatic  Thresholds  of  Sensation  from  Center 

to  Periphery  of  the  Retina  and  their  Bearing  on  Color  Theory.     PSYCHOL.  REV., 
1919,  26,  pp.  16-41;  150-163. 

3.  Ibid.,  pp.  152-153;  Rand,  G.    The  Factors  that  Influence  the  Sensitivity  of  the 

Retina  to  Color:  A  Quantitative  Study  and  Methods  of  Standardizing.     Psychol. 
Man.,  1913,  15,  No.  I,  pp.  117  ff. 

4.  RAND,  G.     Psychol.  A/on.,  1913,  15,  No.  I,  pp.  97-110. 

5.  LANDOLT  UNO  SNELLEN.    Ophthalmometrologie.    Handbuch  der  ges.  Augenheilk. 

von  Graefe  und  Saemische,  1874,  3,  p.  70. 

6.  HESS,  C.    Ueber  den  Farbensinn  bei  indirectem  Sehen.     A.f.O.,  1889,  35,  pp.  1-62. 

7.  HERING,  E.    Ueber  die  Hypothesen  zur  Erklarung  der  peripheren  Farbenblindheit. 

A.f.O.,  1889,  35,  PP-  63-83. 

8.  PICK,  A.    Zur  Theorie  der  Farbenblindheit.    Arbeiten  aus  dem  physiol.  Laborat. 

der  Wurzburger  Hochschule,  pp.  213-217. 

9.  LEBER,  T.    Ueber  die  Theorie  der  Farbenblindheit  und  uber  die  Art  und  Weise, 

wie  gewisse,  der  Untersuchung  von  Farbenblinden  entnommene  Einwande 
gegen  die  Young-Helmholtz'sche  Theorie  sich  mit  derselben  vereinigen  lassen. 
Klin.  Monatsbldtter  f.  Augenheilk.,  1873,  n,  pp.  467-473. 
10.  PETER,  L.  C.    The  Principles  and  Practice  of  Perimetry.     N.  Y.,  1916,  pp.  97-98- 


SOME   FACTORS   IN  THE   PERCEPTION   OF   REL- 
ATIVE MOTION.    A  PRELIMINARY 
EXPERIMENT 

BY  H.  A.  CARR  AND  M.  C.  HARDY 

The  University  of  Chicago 

The  perception  of  motion  is  relative.  The  observer  per- 
ceives the  motion  of  one  object  in  relation  to  some  stationary 
object  or  set  of  conditions.  In  the  perception  of  motion  an 
appreciation  of  the  stability  of  the  one  object  is  just  as  essen- 
tial and  important  as  the  appreciation  of  the  motility  of  the 
moving  object.  The  observer  himself  constitutes  the  center 
of  reference  in  most  perceptual  acts. 

The  perception  of  motion  involves  two  aspects,  an  appre- 
ciation of  the  fact  of  motion,  and  an  appreciation  as  to  which 
of  the  two  objects  is  stationary  and  which  is  in  motion. 
These  two  aspects  are  to  some  extent  independent  variables. 
One's  appreciation  of  them  may  be  based  upon  entirely 
different  sets  of  conditions.  One  may  correctly  perceive 
the  fact  of  motion,  but  judge  erroneously  as  to  which  of  the 
two  is  moving.  If  a  fixated  visual  object  is  moved  toward 
an  observer,  there  results  a  change  in  the  sensory  conditions 
which  mediate  his  judgment  of  distance.  But  exactly  the 
same  changes  will  be  induced  by  a  movement  of  the  observer 
toward  the  object.  Changes  of  these  distance  criteria  as 
intensity,  size  of  retinal  image,  accommodation  and  con- 
vergence, etc.,  serve  to  induce  in  both  cases  an  appreciation 
of  a  change  of  the  distance  between  the  object  and  the 
observer, — an  appreciation  of  the  fact  of  motion.  But  these 
sensory  changes  give  no  clue  as  to  which  object  moved  and 
which  was  stationary.  Judgments  of  the  relative  motility 
of  the  object  and  the  observer  depend  upon  other  factors, 
presumably  certain  characteristics  of  either  one  or  both  of 
the  two  objects  concerned. 

When  the  organism  constitutes  one  of  the  objects  in  the 
24 


PERCEPTION  OF  RELATIVE  MOTION  25 

perceptual  situation,  the  judgments  concerning  the  motility- 
stability  relation  are  based  in  part  upon  certain  sensory 
aspects  of  the  observer.  The  nature  of  these  organic  stimuli 
has  been  pretty  well  determined.  The  judgments  of  relative 
motion  are  based  upon  the  presence  or  absence  of  such 
factors  as  the  intention  or  expectation  of  moving,  the  sight 
or  feeling  of  muscular  activity,  friction,  air  currents,  the 
static  sense,  organic  sensitivity,  etc.  As  a  rule  these  factors 
mediate  correct  judgments,  but  exceptions  occur  as  in  the 
illusions  of  the  haunted  swing,  moving  trains,  etc.  But 
these  organic  factors  do  not  constitute  the  whole  of  the  con- 
ditions which  influence  the  judgments  of  relative  motion. 
These  judgments  are  also  based  in  part  upon  certain  charac- 
teristics of  the  observed  object.  The  haunted  swing  illusion 
is  probably  due  in  part  to  the  fact  that  one  does  not,  on  the 
basis  of  past  experience,  expect  buildings  to  undergo  rotary 
motion.  Likewise  the  perceptual  situation  is  frequently 
confined  to  two  observed  objects  when  all  spatial  relation 
to  the  perceiving  organism  is  pretty  well  excluded.  The 
cloud  and  moon  illusion  illustrates  such  a  perceptual  situation. 
It  is  extremely  improbable  that  this  illusion  is  due  primarily 
or  mainly  to  any  erroneous  judgment  as  to  the  spatial  relation 
of  the  observer  to  either  of  the  objects.  Rather  it  seems 
that  the  judgment  of  relative  motion  in  this  case  depends 
upon  certain  peculiarities  of  the  objective  situation. 

The  existence  and  nature  of  these  objective  factors  have 
never  been  adequately  considered.  It  was  the  purpose  of 
this  experiment  to  attempt  a  preliminary  investigation  con- 
cerning the  possible  influence  of  certain  features  of  the  objec- 
tive situation.  The  experiment  presented  a  condition  some- 
what similar  to  the  cloud  and  moon  illusion.  The  observer 
was  seated  in  a  dark  room  and  was  required  to  judge  as  to 
the  relative  motion  of  two  small  lights  whose  intensities  were 
such  that  no  other  objects  were  visible.  By  this  procedure 
it  was  hoped  that  the  judgments  might  be  based  mainly 
upon  certain  characteristics  of  the  two  lights  rather  than 
upon  any  perceptible  relation  between  them  and  the  observer. 

Two  2  c.p.  electric  lights  were  each  enclosed  within  a 


26  H.  A.  CARR  AND  M.  C.  HARDY 

small  wooden  box  containing  a  small  circular  diaphragm 
opening  covered  with  ground  glass.  Each  box  was  placed 
upon  a  horizontal  double  rod  track.  The  vertical  distance 
between  the  centers  of  the  two  lights  was  72  mm.  Between 
the  two  tracks  was  a  piston  which  was  attached  to  a  metal 
disc,  and  this  disc  was  rotated  by  a  motor  with  a  worm  gear 
speed  reducer.  By  an  appropriate  device  either  one  or  both 
of  the  light  boxes  could  be  easily  and  quickly  attached  to  or 
disengaged  from  the  moving  piston  without  stopping  the 
motor.  The  motion  imparted  to  the  lights  was  thus  a  vibra- 
tory or  pendular  one. 

The  observer  was  seated  at  a  distance  of  8  ft.  from  the 
lights  with  his  line  of  vision  at  right  angles  to  the  direction 
of  motion.  A  cloth  curtain  screened  the  lights  from  view 
while  the  apparatus  was  being  adjusted  and  set  in  motion. 
The  screen  was  then  removed  and  the  observer  was  requested 
to  fixate  a  specified  light  during  four  complete  vibrations. 
The  lights  were  again  covered  while  the  report  of  the  subject 
was  recorded  and  the  apparatus  adjusted  for  the  next  expo- 
sure. Twenty  such  judgments  constituted  a  day's  test  for 
each  subject.  The  subjects  had  been  informed  that  either 
one  or  both  of  the  lights  might  move  in  an  irregular  temporal 
order.  As  a  matter  of  fact  but  one  light  was  moved  at  a  time, 
and  the  two  lights  were  moved  an  equal  number  of  times  in 
each  day's  test  of  20  trials.  The  observer  was  requested  to 
report  the  movements  as  perceived  rather  than  to  attempt  to 
guess  at  the  objective  situation.  The  reports  were  scored 
as  correct  or  illusory.  The  judgment  was  correct  when  the 
moving  light  was  perceived  in  motion  and  the  stationary  light 
as  stable.  Illusory  judgments  were  of  two  sorts:  Both 
lights  were  perceived  as  moving  in  opposite  directions. 
In  this  case  the  two  movements  might  not  be  equal  in  rate  or 
extent.  In  the  second  case  the  moving  light  was  perceived 
as  stationary  and  the  stationary  light  as  moving.  The 
relative  number  of  the  two  types  of  illusion  was  not  a  function 
of  the  variable  factors  studied  and  hence  separate  tabulations 
are  unnecessary. 

The  five  factors  of  the  size  and  intensity  of  the  lights, 


PERCEPTION  OF  RELATIVE  MOTION  *7 

their  extent  and  rate  of  motion,  and  the  direction  of  fixation 
were  chosen  for  study.  The  size  of  the  lights  was  controlled 
by  iris  diaphragms.  Three  magnitudes  were  arbitrarily 
chosen,  whose  diameters  were  4  mm.,  15  mm.,  and  32  mm. 
These  magnitudes  will  be  termed  A,  B,  and  C  respectively. 
The  intensity  of  each  light  was  controlled  by  a  rheostat. 
Three  intensities  were  chosen  and  these  will  be  referred  to 
as  I,  2,  and  3  in  their  order  of  brightness.  Intensity  I  was 
chosen  as  near  the  limen  of  visibility  as  possible  without 
inducing  discomfort  in  the  observer.  Intensity  3  was  the 
maximum  possible  without  illuminating  the  room  to  the 
point  of  visibility.  Intensity  2  was  approximately  a  mean 
between  the  other  two.  Since  the  lights  were  fed  by  a 
storage  battery  giving  a  constant  current,  it  was  possible 
to  reproduce  these  intensities  approximately  by  calibrating 
the  rheostats.  The  extents  of  motion  chosen  were  */2  inch, 
i  inch,  and  2  inches.  The  amplitude  of  the  movement  was 
controlled  by  varying  the  point  of  attachment  of  the  piston 
along  the  radius  of  the  rotating  disc.  The  rate  of  motion 
was  controlled  by  varying  its  amplitude  and  by  altering  the 
speed  of  the  motor  by  a  rheostat.  The  rates  chosen  for 
investigation  were  */4  inch,  */2  inch,  I  inch  and  2  inches  per 
second.  The  conditions  were  arranged  so  that  the  moving 
and  the  stationary  lights  were  fixated  an  equal  number  of 
times.  The  upper  light  was  fixated  during  one  day's  test  of 
twenty  trials  and  the  lower  light  was  then  fixated  on  the 
succeeding  day.  Since  the  upper  light  moved  in  one  half  of 
the  trials,  fixation  was  distributed  equally  between  the  sta- 
tionary and  the  moving  lights.  It  was  thus  possible  to  deter- 
mine which  direction  of  fixation  was  the  more  conducive  to 
correct  perception. 

Some  illusions  were  obtained  for  practically  all  experi- 
mental conditions.  The  efficacy  of  any  factor  must  thus  be 
determined  from  the  relative  frequency  with  which  correct 
judgments  were  obtained  as  that  factor  was  varied.  The 
percentage  frequency  of  correct  judgments  was  determined 
for  one  condition  and  this  value  was  compared  with  that 
obtained  for  a  second  condition.  For  the  individual  records 


28 


H.  A.  CARR  AND  M.  C.  HARDY 


we  utilized  Yule's  formula,  standard  deviation  =  ^pqfn, 
where  n  is  the  number  of  judgments  and  p  and  q  represent 
the  percentages  of  correct  and  wrong  responses.  Unless 
otherwise  stated,  the  number  of  judgments  for  each  condition 
was  80.  In  general  any  difference  of  at  least  12  between  two 
percentage  frequencies  for  an  individual  is  significant.  The 
averages  of  the  individual  records  for  the  group  are  also 
given  in  the  tables.  A  difference  of  10  in  these  values  indi- 
cates a  high  degree  of  probability. 

i.  Effect  of  Size, — The  percentage  frequencies  for  the 
variations  of  size  are  given  in  Table  I.  The  first  vertical 
column  specifies  the  magnitudes  employed.  In  the  first 
condition  the  magnitude  of  both  lights  was  A.  In  the 
second  condition  the  size  of  the  lower  light  was  A  and  that  of 
the  upper  light  was  B.  In  the  third  condition  the  magnitude 
of  the  upper  light  was  changed  to  C.  The  horizontal  rows  of 
figures  are  the  percentage  values  for  the  individuals  and  the 
average  values  for  the  group.  Below  are  specified  the 
various  conditions  which  were  kept  constant  as  the  magni- 
tudes of  the  lights  were  altered.  The  intensity  of  both 
lights  was  i,  the  amplitude  of  movement  was  I  inch,  the  rate 
of  motion  was  */2  inch  per  second,  and  each  of  the  two  lights 
was  moved  and  was  fixated  the  same  number  of  times. 

TABLE  I. 

PERCENTAGES  OF  CORRECT  PERCEPTIONS  WITH  VARIATIONS  OF  SIZE 


Sizes 

J. 

K. 

L. 

M. 

s. 

Ave. 

I.  A-A.  . 

4.7 

22 

4-Q 

69 

34 

44 

2.  A-B  

ti 

29 

75 

82 

32 

54 

3.  A-C  

50 

52 

66 

77 

46 

58 

Constant  conditions:  Intensities,  i;  Amplitude,  I  in.;  Rate,  %  in.  per  sec.;  Equal 
number  of  movements  and  fixations. 

Conditions' 2  and  3,  as  compared  with  I,  are  evidently 
conducive  to  perceptual  accuracy.  With  those  conditions 
the  individual  percentage  values  are  the  larger  in  nine  of  the 
ten  comparisons,  and  five  of  these  are  statistically  significant. 
The  average  values  are  also  the  larger,  the  differences  in  both 
cases  being  significant. 


PERCEPTION  OF  RELATIVE  MOTION 


29 


Comparing  conditions  2  and  3,  two  of  the  individual 
records  favor  the  third  condition  and  both  of  these  are  sig- 
nificant. The  average  values  also  indicate  the  greater 
efficacy  of  the  third  condition,  but  the  difference  between 
them  is  slight.  The  records  do  not  permit  of  any  very  con- 
fident statements.  Either  we  may  say  that  the  two  con- 
ditions do  not  differ  in  efficacy,  or  that  the  third  condition 
is  the  more  effective  with  certain  individuals. 

The  comparative  data  are  ambiguous  in  one  respect.  It 
is  impossible  to  determine  from  this  experiment  whether 
the  number  of  correct  perceptions  is  a  function  of  relative  or 
absolute  size.  On  the  one  hand  it  is  possible  to  assume  that 
the  perceptual  accuracy  is  greater  when  the  two  objects  are 
unequal  in  size  than  when  they  have  the  same  magnitude, 
and  that  the  accuracy  of  some  individuals  is  proportional  to 
the  degree  of  this  inequality.  On  the  other  hand  it  is  equally 
valid  to  conclude  that  perceptual  accuracy  varies  directly 
with  the  magnitude  of  the  combined  areas  of  the  two  objects. 

2.  Influence  of  Intensity. — Three  intensity  conditions 
were  investigated.  In  the  first  the  intensity  of  the  lower 
light  was  I,  and  that  of  the  upper  was  2.  In  the  second 
condition  the  intensity  of  both  lights  was  2,  while  in  the  third 
condition  the  intensity  of  the  upper  light  was  changed  to  3. 
The  percentage  frequencies  of  correct  judgments  for  the 
three  conditions  are  given  in  Table  II. 

TABLE  II 

PERCENTAGES  OF  CORRECT  JUDGMENTS  WITH  VARIATIONS  OF  INTENSITY 


Intensities 

B. 

C. 

Ha. 

Jo. 

P. 

Ave. 

I.   2-1  .  . 

C3 

35 

81 

54 

61 

57 

II.    2-2  

22 

19 

56 

27 

rj 

1? 

III.  2-3  

31 

27 

SS6 

44 

SO 

41 

Constant  conditions:  Magnitudes,  2;  Amplitude,  I  inch;  Rate  #  inch  per  sec.; 
Both  lights  fixated  and  moved  an  equal  number  of  times. 

Condition  I.  gives  the  maximum  of  perceptual  accuracy. 
Its  values  are  the  largest  for  each  individual  and  for  the  group 
as  a  whole,  and  of  these  ten  individual  comparisons  six  are 
significant. 


3°  H.  A.  CARR  AND  M.  C.  HARDY 

Condition  III.  is  slightly  more  effective  than  II.  Three 
individuals  secured  the  larger  values  for  this  condition  and 
one  of  these  comparisons  is  significant.  The  remaining  two 
individuals  of  the  group  gave  practically  identical  records  for 
the  two  conditions. 

Perceptual  accuracy  is  thus  a  function  of  both  relative  and 
absolute  intensity.  On  the  one  hand  an  inequality  in  the 
intensity  of  the  two  lights  gives  more  correct  judgments  than 
does  equality.  When  both  lights  are  unequal  in  brightness, 
the  greater  number  of  correct  responses  are  secured  with  the 
lower  illumination.  Of  the  two  factors,  the  degree  of  illumi- 
nation is  possibly  the  more  effective  one. 

3.  Amplitude  of  Motion. — The  percentages  of  correct 
judgments  with  variations  of  the  amplitude  of  movement  are 
given  in  Table  III.  Our  apparatus  permitted  but  two  ampli- 
tudes for  each  rate  of  motion. 

TABLE  III 

PERCENTAGES  OF  CORRECT  JUDGMENTS  WITH  VARIATIONS  OF  AMPLITUDE 


Amplitudes 

Ba. 

D. 

G. 

H. 

Mi. 

Ave. 

I.  When  rate  of  motion  is  X  inch  Per  sec- 

yi  inch  

72 
70 

47 
42 

26 

24 

2O 
31 

16 
IS 

3^ 
36 

I  inch  

2.  When  rate  of  motion  is  I  inch  per  sec. 

I  inch  

79 
94 

4i 
49 

27 
27 

42 
II 

26 

22 

43 
41 

2  inch  

Constant  conditions:  Intensities,  2;  Sizes,  A;  Equal  distribution  of  movements 
and  fixations  between  the  two  lights. 

The  ability  to  perceive  correctly  does  not  appear  to  depend 
in  any  pronounced  manner  upon  the  amplitude  of  motion. 
Six  of  the  ten  individual  comparisons  indicate  the  greater 
efficiency  of  the  smaller  extents  of  motion  and  one  of  these 
is  significant;  three  comparisons  indicate  that  more  correct 
perceptions  are  possible  with  the  larger  movements  and  one 
of  these  is  significant;  one  comparison  favors  neither  assump- 
tion. The  results  of  but  one  of  the  five  individuals  (Mi.) 
consistently  favor  either  assumption;  both  comparative  values 


PERCEPTION  OF  RELATIVE  MOTION  31 

of  this  subject  indicate  the  greater  efficacy  of  the  lesser 
amplitudes,  but  the  differences  in  both  comparisons  are 
quite  small.  From  these  data  one  is  not  justified  in  asserting 
that  perceptual  accuracy  is  dependent  upon  the  amplitude 
of  motion  so  far  as  this  factor  was  varied. 

4.  Influence  of  Rate  of  Motion. — Table  IV.  gives  the 
percentages  of  correct  judgments  for  variations  of  rate  of 
motion.  Our  apparatus  permitted  of  but  two  variations  of 
speed  for  each  amplitude  of  movement. 

TABLE  IV 

PERCENTAGES  OF  CORRECT  JUDGMENTS  WITH  VARIATIONS  OF  RATE  OF  MOTION 


Rate*  of  Motion 

Ba. 

D. 

G. 

H. 

Mi. 

Ave. 

I.  With  amplitude  of  y*  inch 

%  inch  per  sec  

57 
.    72 

45 
47 

2 
26 

IS 
20 

2O 
16 

27 
36 

Ji  inch  per  sec  

2.  With  amplitude  of  i  inch 

J^  inch  per  sec  

70 
79 

42 
41 

24 
27 

31 
42 

14 

26 

36 

43 

I  inch  per  sec  

3.  With  amplitude  of  2  inches 

I  inch  per  sec  

94 
Si 

49 
66 

27 
62 

II 

16 

22 
I? 

4i 
4» 

2  inch  per  sec  

Constant  conditions:  Sizes,  A\  Intensities,  2;  Equal  distribution  of  movements 
and  fixations  between  the  two  lights. 

In  each  of  the  first  two  series  the  faster  rate  gives  the 
greater  number  of  correct  judgments  in  four  of  the  five 
individual  comparisons;  of  the  eight  favorable  comparisons 
four  are  significant.  In  the  third  series  three  of  the  indi- 
vidual comparisons  favor  the  faster  rate.  Two  individuals, 
G.  and  H.,  were  invariably  more  accurate  with  the  faster 
rates.  Individuals  Ba.  and  D.  were  more  accurate  with  the 
faster  rate  in  two  of  the  three  series.  Mi.  was  more  accurate 
with  the  faster  rate  in  but  one  of  the  series. 

The  facts  indicate  that  the  rate  of  motion  is  effective  at 
least  with  some  individuals,  and  that  in  the  majority  of  cases 
perceptual  accuracy  is  greater  for  the  faster  rates  of  motion. 


H.  A.  CARR  AND  M.  C.  HARDY 


5.  Individual  Differences  in  Perceptive  Ability. — In  Table 
V.  the  individuals  of  each  group  are  ranked  according  to 
their  ability  to  perceive  the  objective  situation  correctly. 
Group  I  was  composed  of  five  subjects.  These  individuals 
were  tested  for  three  series  in  which  the  size  of  the  lights  was 
varied  (See  Table  I.).  These  individuals  were  ranked  ac- 

TABLE  V 

RANKS  OF  INDIVIDUALS  IN  RESPECT  TO  NUMBER  OF  CORRECT  JUDGMENTS 

Group  I 


M. 

L. 

J. 

s. 

K. 

I 

2 

3 

4 

5 

I 

2 

3 

4 

5 

I 

2 

4 

5 

3 

Total  

3 

6 

10 

13 

13 

Group  2 


Ha. 

P. 

Jo- 

B. 

C. 

I 

2 

3 

4 

5 

I 

2 

3 

4 

5 

I 

2 

3 

4 

5 

Total  

3 

6 

9 

12 

15 

Group  3 


Ba. 

D. 

G. 

H. 

Mi. 

2 

5 

4 

3 

2 

3 

4 

5 

2 

4 

3 

S 

3 

4 

2 

5 

2 

3 

S 

4 

3 

I 

2 

s 

4 

Total.  . 

8 

12 

21 

2"? 

26 

cording  to  the  number  of  correct  judgments.  Subject  M. 
secured  the  highest  percentage  in  all  three  tests  and  is  ranked 
first  three  times  with  a  total  score  of  3.  Subject  L.  stood 
second  in  every  case  with  a  total  score  of  6.  From  these 
data  it  is  obvious  that  individuals  differ  in  their  ability  to 
perceive  the  situation  correctly.  In  group  2  the  five  subjects 
maintained  the  same  relative  ranking  in  all  three  tests. 
Some  individuals  are  able  to  perceive  a  relative  movement 
situation  with  a  high  degree  of  accuracy  while  other  indivi- 


PERCEPTION  OF  RELATIVE  MOTION 


33 


duals  are  more  prone  to  perceptual  illusions.  It  is  possible 
that  this  experiment  might  constitute  a  good  test  for  deter- 
mining the  relative  suggestibility  of  different  individuals. 

6.  Influence  of  Direction  of  Fixation. — In  any  series  of 
80  judgments,  the  moving  light  was  fixated  40  times  and  the 
stationary  light  was  fixated  an  equal  number  of  times. 
The  percentages  of  correct  judgments  for  each  kind  of  fixation 
were  computed  for  each  individual  for  all  experimental 
conditions.  These  percentage  values  are  given  in  Table  VI. 

TABLE  VI 

PERCENTAGES  OF  CORRECT  JUDGMENTS  WITH  VARIATION  or  FIXATION 


Fixation 

L. 

M. 

G. 

Moving  

50  70  60 

6?   QO  72 

2?  27  27     27     2     4C 

Stationary  

48  80  72 

72  75  82 

22  25   27     27     2      57 

Ha. 

Jo. 

Ba. 

Moving  

6<;  <;7  7? 

1  47  42 

cc   CQ  7C     87  67        2 

Stationary  

47  S6  87 

SO  40  65 

85  95  82  ico  47  100 

S. 

B. 

H. 

Moving  

C,    I?   4.O 

7  12  •;; 

2O      C    12        C      C,         5 

Stationary  

62  50  47 

37  SO  70 

42  35  72    17  25    27 

J. 

c. 

Mi. 

Moving  

C7  77  72 

1O   C2  62 

c      2      O        O   1O        O 

Stationary  

38  30  27 

727 

22  30  52    45  10    35 

P. 

K. 

D. 

Moving  

4-2  4?   1C 

i<;  27  42 

32  45  17    30  30    35 

Stationary  

60  55  87 

3O  3O  62 

52  50  65    67  60    97 

Subject  L  was  tested  for  three  experimental  conditions. 
His  percentages  of  correct  perceptions  when  the  moving  light 
was  fixated  were  50,  70  and  60.  These  values  are  to  be 
compared  with  the  percentages  of  48,  80  and  72  secured 
when  the  stationary  light  was  observed.  Each  percentage 
value  of  the  table  is  based  upon  40  judgments.  With  this 
number  of  cases  a  probability  that  direction  of  fixation  is  an 
effective  factor  in  the  perception  of  relative  motion  will  be 
indicated  by  any  difference  of  20  or  more. 

With  four  subjects,  L.,  M.,  G.,  and  Ha.,  the  direction  of 
fixation  did  not  appreciably  influence  the  number  of  correct 


34 


H.  A.  CARR  AND  M.  C.  HARDY 


perceptions.  The  comparative  values  do  not  consistently 
favor  either  mode  of  fixation,  and  none  of  the  differences  are 
large  enough  to  be  significant. 

With  two  subjects,  J.  and  C.,  fixation  of  the  moving  object 
is  the  more  conducive  to  perceptual  accuracy.  This  mode  of 
fixation  is  favored  in  all  comparisons  and  all  of  the  differences 
are  significant. 

With  the  remaining  nine  individuals,  the  greater  percep- 
tual efficiency  was  attained  by  observing  the  stationary  object. 
For  these  subjects  36  of  the  39  comparisons  favor  this  mode 
of  fixation,  and  of  these  36  comparative  values  27  are  sig- 
nificant. 

IABLE  VII 

PERCENTAGES  OF  CORRECT  JUDGMENTS  WHEN  EACH  LIGHT  WAS  STATIONARY 


Subject 

Stable  Light 

Experimental  Condition 

i 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

Are. 

Ba  

Upper.  . 

60 
80 
30 

55 
45 

2 
30 
32 

22 

5 

72 

85 
27 

55 
42 

12 
42 
42 
30 
22 

62 
82 
42 
52 
42 
10 

IS 

25 
25 
7 

80 

35 
30 
60 

2 

2 

IS 
IS 

40 

o 

95 
92 
27 
70 
40 
IS 

12 
IO 

25 
2O 

52 
SO 

57 
75 
60 

42 

12 
2O 
17 
17 

70 
71 
IS 

61 
38 
H 

21 

2i 

26 

12 

D  

Lower  

Upper.  . 

G  

Lower  

Upper.  . 

H  

Lower  

Upper.  . 

Mi  

Lower  

Upper.  . 

Lower  

Constant  conditions:  Lights  equal  in  size  and  intensity;  Equal  number  of  fixations 
and  movements. 

7.  The  Influence  of  Position. — In  Table  VII.  are  listed 
the  percentages  of  correct  judgments  when  the  upper  light 
was  stationary  as  compared  with  the  percentages  when  the 
lower  light  was  immobile.  The  upper  and  lower  lights  were 
equal  in  size  and  intensity  for  all  six  experimental  conditions. 
The  two  lights  were  fixated  an  equal  number  of  times.  The 
data  are  given  only  for  the  third  group  of  subjects,  since  the 
two  objects  were  not  always  equal  in  size  or  intensity  for 
groups  i  and  2.  In  the  first  experimental  condition,  Ba. 
correctly  perceived  60  per  cent,  of  the  40  cases  in  which  the 
upper  light  was  stationary  and  the  lower  moving.  He 
perceived  correctly  80  per  cent,  of  the  40  cases  in  which  the 


PERCEPTION  OF  RELATIVE  MOTION  35 

lower  light  was  stable  and  the  upper  one  was  moving.  This 
comparison  was  instituted  to  determine  whether  either 
position  tends  to  be  associated  with  stability.  A  difference 
of  20  in  the  individual  values  and  of  n  in  the  average  values 
indicates  a  probability  of  the  efficacy  of  the  position  factor. 

Position  did  not  exert  any  appreciably  consistent  effect 
with  subjects  Ba.  and  H. 

Subject  D.  consistently  perceived  the  situation  more 
correctly  when  the  lower  light  was  stable  and  the  upper  in 
motion  than  in  the  reverse  case.  Five  of  the  seven  compari- 
sons are  statistically  significant.  With  this  individual  the 
lower  position  is  associated  with  immobility  and  the  upper 
one  with  motility. 

Subjects  G.  and  Mi.  exhibited  more  correct  perceptions 
when  the  stationary  light  occupied  the  upper  position.  Both 
subjects  were  consistent  in  this  preference  with  one  exception 
in  which  the  two  percentage  values  were  equal.  These 
individuals  tend  to  associate  stability  with  the  upper  position. 

8.  Summary. — The  subjects  were  required  to  judge  con- 
cerning the  relative  motion  of  two  lights,  one  of  which  was 
always  stationary. 

Perceptual  accuracy  was  promoted  either  by  a  difference 
in  size  of  the  two  lights  or  by  an  increase  in  their  combined 
area.  Possibly  both  conditions  may  have  been  operative. 

Perceptual  accuracy  was  favored  by  an  inequality  of 
brightness  of  the  two  lights  and  by  a  decrease  of  their  com- 
bined illumination. 

The  amplitude  or  extent  of  motion  so  far  as  this  factor 
was  varied  did  not  exert  any  effect  upon  perceptual  ability. 

Perception  was  generally  more  accurate  with  the  faster 
rates  of  motion. 

The  individuals  exhibited  consistent  differences  in  their 
ability  to  perceive  the  situation  correctly. 

The  majority  of  the  subjects  were  able  to  perceive  the 
situation  more  correctly  with  stationary  eyes,  i.e.t  when  the 
stationary  light  was  fixated  and  the  moving  light  was  per- 
ceived with  indirect  vision.  Some  individuals  gave  the 
better  records  when  the  moving  light  was  fixated.  Other 


36  H.  A.  CARR  AND  M.  C.  HARDY 

individuals  were  able  to  judge  equally  well  for  both  conditions 
of  fixation. 

Some  individuals  were  able  to  perceive  more  correctly 
when  the  stationary  light  occupied  the  upper  position,  while 
the  opposite  condition  obtained  for  other  subjects.  The 
position  of  the  stationary  light  was  not  effective  for  other 
observers. 

The  influence  of  such  factors  as  the  degree  of  illumination 
and  the  rate  of  motion  upon  perceptual  ability  is  obvious. 

The  influence  of  fixation  indicates  that  certain  individuals 
solved  the  problem  in  part  by  an  indirect  reference  of  one  of 
the  objects  to  the  organism.  It  is  practically  impossible  to 
exclude  all  spatial  reference  of  the  objects  to  the  observer. 
Some  subjects  were  apparently  able  to  detect  the  moving 
object  by  means  of  the  eye  sensitivity  involved  in  following  it. 
Others  were  able  to  identify  the  stationary  object  by  the 
absence  of  eye  movement  while  fixating  it.  Individual 
differences  in  this  respect  do  not  admit  of  a  ready  explanation. 

We  have  no  explanatory  suggestions  to  offer  for  the  in- 
fluence of  inequalities  of  size  and  brightness. 

The  influence  of  the  position  of  the  stationary  light  may 
be  explained  by  the  supposition  that  the  subjects  apprehended 
the  perceptual  situation  much  as  though  the  two  lights 
constituted  the  ends  of  a  swinging  pendulum.  Individuals 
who  exhibited  any  tendency  to  conceive  the  situation  as 
similar  to  a  simple  suspended  pendulum  will  obviously 
associate  the  upper  position  with  stability  and  hence  will 
make  a  greater  number  of  correct  judgments  when  the  sta- 
tionary light  occupies  this  position.  On  the  contrary  those 
who  preferred  to  regard  the  situation  as  analogous  to  a 
metronome  will  associate  the  lower  position  with  immobility 
and  give  the  better  records  when  the  lower  light  is  stationary. 
Certain  subjects  were  not  influenced  by  the  position  of  the 
stationary  light.  This  fact  may  be  explained  by  supposing 
that  these  subjects  conceived  the  situation  as  a  compound 
pendulum  with  the  center  of  rotation  located  between  the 
two  lights,  that  they  were  able  to  assume  equally  well  either 
of  the  first  two  attitudes,  or  that  they  failed  to  adopt  any 
pendular  attitude. 


PERCEPTION  OF  RELATIVE  MOTION  37 

Individual  differences  in  perceptive  ability  may  likewise 
be  explained  in  part  by  differences  in  apperceptive  attitude. 
Individuals  who  are  able  to  adapt  the  first  two  attitudes  to 
the  objective  sequence  will  naturally  make  unusually  high 
scores.  Subjects  inclined  to  regard  the  movements  as  similar 
to  a  compound  pendulum  will  obviously  make  poor  records. 
No  introspective  records  were  taken  in  regard  to  these 
apperceptive  attitudes  during  the  experimentation.  The 
hypothesis  is  suggested  on  the  basis  of  its  a  priori  plausibility. 

The  possibility  that  the  subjects  may  adopt  some  pendular 
attitude  toward  the  situation  suggests  that  it  is  advisable 
in  future  experiments  to  eliminate  this  complicating  condition 
by  locating  the  two  lights  in  a  horizontal  plane. 


A   NEW   OBJECTIVE  TEST  FOR  VERBAL  IMAGERY 

TYPES 

BY  SAMUEL  D.  ROBBINS 

From  the  Psychological  Laboratory,  Harvard  University 

The  purpose  of  this  experiment  was  to  devise  an  objective 
test  by  means  of  which  the  vividness  of  auditory,  visual,  and 
kinaesthetic  verbal  imagery  of  persons  who  cannot  be  de- 
pended upon  for  intelligent  introspection  may  be  quickly  and 
accurately  determined. 

I  had  for  subjects  six  students  who  were  studying  psy- 
chology. Four  of  these  subjects  were  men,  two  were  women. 
Two  other  women  were  subjects  only  in  the  first  test  described. 
No  subject  was  under  twenty  years  of  age  or  over  thirty. 
All  of  the  women  were  born  and  educated  in  this  country 
and  had  all  their  lives  spoken  English  fluently.  All  the  men, 
on  the  other  hand,  were  born  and  educated  in  foreign  lands, 
had  spoken  English  but  a  few  years,  had  a  distinctly  foreign 
accent,  and  had  limited  vocabularies  of  English  words  differing 
much  from  each  other. 

A  number  of  series  of  card  pairs  containing  a  single 
column  of  five  monosyllabic  nonsense  words  of  three  or  four 
letters  were  very  carefully  typewritten  (double  spaced)  so 
as  to  look  exactly  alike  except  for  one  word  which  differed 
from  the  corresponding  word  on  the  other  card  in  a  single 
letter.  The  following  types  of  nonsense  groups  were  tabu- 
lated separately,  the  card  pairs  being  shuffled  so  that  the 
subject  could  not  predict  the  nature  of  the  next  change: 
(i)  the  spelling  was  changed  without  altering  the  pronun- 
ciation, as  veek-veak;  (2)  two  long  vowels  were  exchanged,  as 
zoke-zake;  (3)  a  short  vowel  was  exchanged  for  the  same  long 
vowel,  as  koss-kose,  there  being  another  change,  a  visual  one, 
in  most  cases;  (4)  two  short  vowels  were  exchanged,  as  meb- 
mib;  (5)  two  consonants  were  exchanged  which  gave  quite 
different  auditory  and  kinsesthetic  impressions,  as  aze-ane; 
38 


OBJECTIVE  TEST  FOR  VERBAL  IMAGERY  TYPES  39 

(6)  two  consonants  were  exchanged  which  sounded  much 
alike  but  gave  quite  a  different  kinaesthetic  impression  in  a 
trial  series,  as  miz-niz;  (7)  two  consonants  were  exchanged 
which  gave  about  the  same  auditory  and  kinaesthetic  im- 
pression in  a  trial  series,  as  bim-pim.  As  some  changes 
necessitated  four-letter  words,  at  least  one  four-letter  word 
appeared  on  each  pair  of  cards.  There  was  an  equal  number 
of  changes  at  the  beginning,  middle,  and  end  of  the  word 
and  for  each  of  the  five  positions  of  the  word  in  the  column; 
hence  the  position  of  the  change  could  not  be  predicted. 

The  nonsense  words  were  given  to  the  subjects  in  three 
ways:  (i)  They  were  read  loud  by  the  experimenter,  the 
subject  being  careful  not  to  repeat,  spell,  or  visualize  the 
word;  (2)  the  subject  repeated  each  word  as  it  was  read  to 
him  before  the  next  word  was  read,  being  careful  not  to  spell 
or  visualize  it;  and  (3)  the  cards  were  exposed  in  a  tachisto- 
scope  and  the  subject  was  asked  to  whisper  each  word. 
(Subjects  were  asked  to  whisper  rather  than  to  read  aloud 
because  most  stammerers  can  whisper  without  stammering, 
and  these  results  are  later  to  be  compared  with  those  obtained 
from  stammerers.)  The  first  method  permitted  the  subject 
to  employ  auditory  imagery  alone,  the  second  permitted  both 
auditory  and  kinaesthetic  imagery,  and  the  third  auditory, 
kinaesthetic,  and  visual  imagery.  There  was  an  interval  of 
five  seconds  between  the  reading  of  the  first  card  of  a  pair 
and  the  first  word  of  the  second  card,  during  which  the  subject 
was  requested  not  to  think  of  any  of  the  words  on  the  first 
card. 

The  subjects  followed  this  direction  remarkably  well,  and 
formed  surprisingly  few  associations  with  these  nonsense 
words.  They  forgot  the  nonsense  words  on  the  earlier  cards 
before  the  later  cards  were  read,  hence  memory  of  words 
on  the  first  test  played  little  if  any  part  in  the  recogni- 
tion of  changes  by  the  second  and  third  methods;  changes 
which  were  detected  when  the  cards  were  read  by  the  first 
method  were  frequently  not  detected  when  the  same  cards 
were  subsequently  read  by  the  same  subject  by  a  different 
method.  In  the  few  cases  where  a  change  was  remembered 


40  SAMUEL  D.  ROBBINS 

from  a  previous  test,  the  letter  'A'  was  written  on  the  record 
so  that  this  change  could  be  omitted  in  compiling  the  results 
if  enough  associations  were  formed  to  alter  the  averages 
materially.  Each  series  was  read  at  the  speed  which  each 
subject  found  most  satisfactory  on  a  trial  series. 

The  subjects  were  asked  to  report  on  a  scale  of  o  to  3 
whether  there  was  a  change,  o  indicated  that  there  was  no 
change  or  that  the  subject  did  not  know  whether  there  was  a 
change.  I  meant  there  might  have  been  a  change  of  which 
the  subject  was  not  at  all  sure.  2  denoted  that  the  subject 
was  pretty  sure  there  was  a  change.  3  showed  that  the 
subject  was  positive  there  was  a  change.  If  a  subject  re- 
ported the  right  position  of  the  change,  he  was  credited  the 
score  he  reported  even  if  he  gave  the  wrong  word  or  could 
not  remember  the  word.  If  he  reported  there  was  no  change 
when  there  was  a  change,  his  score  for  the  change  was  o. 
As  a  matter  of  fact,  every  card  was  changed,  except  when  a 
subject  reported  so  many  changes  in  succession  that  I  feared 
he  would  mistrust  my  instructions  that  some  pairs  of  cards 
had  one  change  and  others  had  no  change. 

The  subject  was  also  required  to  report  what  the  changed 
word  was  on  both  cards,  stating  how  sure  he  was  of  the  word 
he  reported  on  the  same  scale  of  o  to  3.  For  his  word  score, 
he  was  given  the  score  of  the  word  of  which  he  was  less  sure. 
If  he  forgot  one  of  the  words  or  reported  one  or  both  words 
incorrectly  his  word  score  was  o.  If,  on  the  other  hand,  he 
detected  the  main  change  correctly  but  made  the  same  mis- 
take in  some  minor  letter  of  both  words,  he  was  given  full 
credit. 

Each  subject  was  given  a  long  trial  series1  by  each  method 
before  the  cards  representing  the  scores  compiled  in  table  I 
were  used.  Subjects  were  therefore  familiar  with  the  expe- 
riment before  the  series  reported  was  used. 

Table  I.  shows  the  average  score  each  subject  obtained 
in  each  of  the  seven  groups  of  changes  by  each  of  the  three 
methods  of  presentation.  The  four  columns  in  division  6 

1  One  trial  series  consisted  of  sense  words.  This  series  was  discarded  because  the 
words  proved  unequally  familiar  to  the  men  of  foreign  birth. 


OBJECTIVE  TEST  FOR  VERBAL  IMAGERY  TYPES 


4« 


£  E 

< 

O  ^s  to  to  O  ^s  is,  ^^ 

**     •*•  ^  t*NO    VO  VO  VO 

00    «0 
t*  00 

*^ 

J 

ss^a^^s 

*t  *** 

^ 

K 

«««««MOO 

-     M 

•• 

J 

-  - 

M 

|ji 

•i 

H5H5I8 

VO  « 

* 

If 

5:' 

»*    «0<O.    Is.  H    O    €0  vo 
«   ON«    fOQ   ls.00 

M   _,,_,,   f<   O   O 

i! 

! 

-|  a. 

pi 

^.885^.00^ 

z& 

^ 

9 

. 

VOOO   vo  to  vovO   t*  CO 
VOOO    «    ONOO    K  -+O 

K»  to 

3 

If 

fl«("4^«^-OO 

M     M 

•* 

J 

---OOOOO 

0  - 

*• 

IJ 

j 

oooooooo 

r*  Is. 
t*  vo 

5. 

^ 

. 

O»  *•  NO    ON  ^00    ONOO 

»o  r<   Is.  Is.  ON  vo  ^»vO 

oT8 

s 

-«<"«-  ~oo 

M    M 

M 

-«-ddddd 

0  - 

< 

to  tooo  r»  to  to  Q  f 

O    x    «    ON  l>-  VO    ON  O 

5^ 

$ 

_ 

8«o  ls.vO  H  \O  NO   r* 
O    ON  ONOO    ts.O    O 

^9 

to 

C*NP«i-i»«i-iOl 

—    — 

M 

n 

•• 

I 

. 

O   vo  vo  O   O   vovovo 

•«*•  vo  ONOO    M    Is.  ON  O 

ON«" 

<§ 

I 

. 

VO|S.^QQVO  O  «  O 

fctf 

M 

0 

* 

W«t«~t*r«0« 

M   t* 

r* 

\i 

r*fifi««H«- 

-  H 

M 

s 

Jj 

. 

8O  O  vo  O  vo  10  Q 
11    M  VO    vo  O    ONOO 

o  oo 

«. 

pi 

•*  »*•  ONNO   vo  t*  OO   to 

oooo 

—  OO 

to 

vo 

««««««oo 

M     M 

•-1 

N««MMMM00 

M     M 

** 

. 

vovoOOOOOO 

ts.  ts.  ^  to  vo  1-1  oo  c* 

OO   t* 

tooo 

vS 

I 

. 

OO   •-•   ^  N  OO  VO  NO   t* 
ONOO   O   O   vo  to  O   O 

Is.  to 

tooo 

NO 

«««c*«««« 

—  — 

"* 

V 

o 

8S88S8S-S 

vo  O 

to  ON 

VO 

-.= 

> 

Is.  NO   •*  O  O  O   +  •* 

tovo 
to  to 

5 

DC 

tot*  to  tot*  «  «  « 

t*    N 

W 

0  - 

0 

1 

. 

80  0  Q  Q  0  0  0 
O   O   O   O  OO   -*00 

vo  O 

N    O 

VO 

vi  X 

6C-5 

5  N  " 

. 

°*v88S£-S3.£ 

to  to 
O  oo 

to 

i 

to  to  to  to  tor*  «  « 

f*  to 

ci 

ri    —    —    -    —    tl    O    O 

M     M 

•* 

1 

pi 

83-88883-3. 

vovo 

M  OO 

VO 
vo 

Pi 

Ooo  to  rs  to  o  ^s 

vo  oo  O  vovO  tovo   O 

VOVO 

P^ 

I 

tor.  to  to  to-  t*  c* 

C«    « 

** 

°* 

M«OOOOOO 

O  « 

0 

J 

80  0  Q  O  O  O  O 
OO  O  -*-O  -*oo 

vo  vo 

VOOO 

O 

3J 

. 

^Q^JsON-^gto 

O  O 

to  «-• 

o 

(A 

to  to  to  toe*  f*  r«  <* 

«  t* 

N 

--d-dddd 

O  - 

o 

^ 

is.  Q  to  to  vo  Q  Ooo 

VO  OO    ON  O-OO  OO    to  O 

VOOO 

V& 

g 

Svjss'irs'as 

vo  to 
OO  vo 

* 

t*c*t*t*c«t*t*t* 

f*    C* 

N 

it 

0  - 

"* 

- 

> 

^8^8885-^ 

vo  ON 

VO 

. 

OOOtoQtoQQ 
¥•  t*   r*   1000   >-  OOvC 

tooo 

- 

| 

t*  tot*  to  to  tot*  « 

t*    t* 

N 

•>  B 

M«t*«««00 

—  - 

*• 

& 

to  O  *^*  ir*  °^  O  ^^  l^> 
t*^  tN.  O^OO   u*>  fs.  O^  N 

vo  « 

5; 

K.H 

. 

«R«JJfSR^o- 

roOO 
to  •+ 

ON 

N««t*«««M 

f*    C* 

M 

c*«0«0000 

O  •« 

0 

R.R888RVOVO 

O  vo 

vo  oo 

M 

15 

U 

. 

~  gfc-SSSO  to 

O  to 

vo  •- 

a 

«t*  to^tot*  t*« 

t*  c* 

** 

«--00000 

0  - 

O 

M 

?|S 

I 

oooooooo 

vo  vo  ON  Is.  Is.  ^vO   to 

VO  O 

vovo 

•  5 

OO 
vn 

.  a 

.    V 

2 

i 

• 

lii-jiiy 

fj 

b 

c 
u 

1 

V) 

11 

«2«2 

I 

"t 

u 

^wpiSQH<ity3 

<< 

< 

^U(^^QE-<<a> 

< 

42  SAMUEL  D.  ROBBINS 

give  the  average  word  scores  for  all  of  the  groups  taken  as  a 
whole;  the  other  columns  give  the  average  change  scores. 
In  this  table  there  are  four  columns  each  in  divisions  2,  3,  4, 
5,  6,  7,  8  and  9.  Of  these  four  columns  the  one  headed  L 
contains  each  subject's  average  score  in  the  first  test  where  he 
listened  to  the  words  as  they  were  read  to  him;  that  marked  R 
contains  those  in  the  second  test  where  the  subject  repeated 
each  word  after  the  experimenter;  that  marked  W  contains 
those  in  the  third  test  where  the  subject  whispered  the  words 
exposed  in  the  tachistoscope;  and  that  marked  Av.  contains 
the  average  of  the  other  three  columns.  Division  I  is  not 
divided  into  four  columns  because  the  subject  only  whispered 
those  sets  in  which  the  changed  word  was  spelled  differently 
yet  pronounced  exactly  like  the  first  word  exposed  in  the 
tachistoscope.  At  the  bottom  of  this  table  are  given  the 
average  scores  in  each  test  for  the  men,  for  the  women,  and 
for  all  eight  subjects.  Subjects  D,  E,  M  and  W  are  women, 
and  subjects  A,  R,  S  and  T  are  men. 

This  table  shows  that  the  women  as  a  class  did  much 
better  in  every  test  than  the  men  and  that  subjects  who  did 
especially  well  in  detecting  some  change  also  did  especially 
well  in  remembering  exactly  what  word  appeared  on  each  card, 
the  correlation1  being  -f-  0.929. 

This  table  shows  also  that  long  vowel  changes  are  much 
more  readily  detected  than  short  vowel  changes;  it  makes 
little  if  any  difference  whether  a  long  vowel  is  changed  to 
the  same  short  vowel  or  to  a  different  long  vowel.  Con- 
spicuous consonant  changes  are  noted  almost  as  readily 
as  short  vowel  changes,  inconspicuous  ones  far  less  frequently. 
The  whispering  test  gave  the  highest  and  the  most  uniform 
scores  for  all  subjects.  The  subject  of  vowel  versus  consonant 
changes  will  be  more  thoroughly  discussed  in  a  later  paper 
comparing  the  verbal  imagery  of  normal  speakers  with  that 
of  stammerers. 

Columns  I,  2,  3  and  4  of  Table  II.  give  the  vividness  of 
each  subject's  verbal  imagery  on  a  scale  of  o  to  3  as 

1  All  correlations  were  derived  from  the  formula,  r  =     .  =  ,  where  x  and 


y  are  the  deviations  of  the  two  traits  from  their  mean  in  any  single  individual 


OBJECTIVE   TEST  FOR  VERBAL  IMAGERY  TYPES 


43 


determined  from  his  ability  to  detect  changes  by  auditory 
imagery,  kinaesthetic  imagery,  and  visual  imagery.  These 
ranks  are  determined  as  follows:  The  visual  rank  is  the 
average  score  of  the  subject  in  detecting  by  whispering  changes 

TABLE  II 

COMPARATIVE  EFFICIENCY  OF  DIFFERENT  TYPES  OF  VERBAL  IMAGERY 


Subject 

i 

a 

3 

3- 

4 

5 

6 

7 

« 

9 

Auditory 

> 

1 

If 

S.| 
w« 

Copying 
Long  Non- 
sense 
Word* 

Copying 
Perverted 
mnd  In- 
verted Print 

Writing 
Perverted 
and 
Inverted 

Column  1 
of  Table  i 

w.. 

2-5 
2.8 

i-9 
2-3 

2.1 

1-9 

i-5 

2.0 
2.4 

1-7 

3 

1-7 

0.4 
0.9 
i.i 

O.I 
O.I 

5-7 

S-2 
5-2 

5-i 

ii 

0.82 

10.12 

i-33 
6.03 
7.25 
22.05 

5 

49 
13 
I 

25 
43 

28 

77 
34 
80 

157 

49 

3 
7 

201 
20 
171 

2.20 

i-97 
1.76 
1.82 

1.02 
1.  06 

R  

T  

D  

S  

A  

Av.  for  women.  .  .  . 
Av.  for  men  

2-5 
2.2 

1.6 
1.6 

i-5 

0.4 

S-6 
4.1 

3-43 
10.19 

3 

32 

21 

1  06 

I2S 

SO 

2.01 

i-45 

Av.  for  all  O's  

2-3 

1.6 

0.9 

4.9 

7-93 

23 

64 

75 

1.64 

Correlation  with  co 

1-4. 

+0.90 
without  R 

+0.94 
without  R 

+0.90 

+0.83 
for  men 

+0-9S 

in  words  that  are  pronounced  alike  but  spelled  differently, 
such  as  zeat-zeet.  The  auditory  rank  is  the  average  score 
obtained  by  the  subject  in  detecting  vowel  changes  in  all 
three  vowel  groups  when  these  are  read  aloud  to  him.  Trial 
experiments  showed  that  kinaesthetic  imagery  played  little 
if  any  part  in  these  groups  and  that  it  actually  reduced  the 
score  in  many  cases.  The  kinaesthetic  rank  is  the  average 
score  the  subject  obtained  when  he  repeated  after  the  expe- 
rimenter those  cards  in  which  changes  had  been  made  in 
words  which  sound  much  alike  but  give  quite  a  different 
kinaesthetic  impression  (such  as  vad-vab),  and  in  which  he 
failed  to  detect  changes  when  they  were  read  aloud  to  him. 
The  kinaesthetic  and  auditory  imagery  are  so  closely  connected 
that  I  could  find  no  better  way  to  separate  them.  Trial 
series  showed  that  there  is  little  likelihood  the  subject  will  be 
able  to  detect  a  second  time  a  slight  auditory  change  which 
he  does  not  detect  the  first  time  by  the  same  method.  The 


44  SAMUEL  D.  ROBBINS 

changes  in  this  group  were  so  chosen  from  the  introspections 
on  a  trial  series  as  to  reduce  to  a  minimum  the  auditory 
element,  and  to  make  the  kinaesthetic  element  as  prominent 
as  possible.  There  is  a  close  correlation,  +0.950,  between 
the  average  ranks  of  subjects  for  the  entire  series  as  recorded 
in  the  average  column  in  division  8  in  Table  I.  and  the  total 
ranks  obtained  by  adding  together  their  three  ranks  in 
columns  I,  2,  and  3  of  Table  II.  as  recorded  in  column  4. 
It  seems  to  make  little  difference,  therefore,  what  type  of 
imagery  is  employed  for  the  test  as  a  whole;  the  subject 
possessing  the  greater  sum  total  of  verbal  imagery  attains 
the  higher  rank  in  this  experiment. 

Before  beginning  any  tests,  each  subject  was  asked  to 
answer  the  questionnaire  given  on  pages  195-200  of  E.  B. 
Titchener's  'Experimental  Psychology,  Student's  Manual, 
Qualitative.'  A  careful  examination  of  the  question  blanks 
showed  there  was  no  correlation  between  verbal  and  non- 
verbal imagery.  It  is  incorrect  to  assume,  therefore,  that 
because  one  has  very  vivid  non-verbal  imagery  of  a  given 
type  he  must  also  have  very  vivid  verbal  imagery  of  the 
same  type. 

The  four  experiments  which  follow  were  performed  to 
confirm  the  reliability  of  the  preceding  test. 

After  the  test  with  nonsense  words  had  been  completed, 
each  subject  was  asked  to  spell  backward  twenty  words  of 
increasing  length,  beginning  with  two  letters  and  ending  with 
twenty-two,  and  to  report  the  method  he  employed  for  both 
the  short  and  the  long  words.  The  experimenter  kept  a 
record  of  the  time  spent  in  spelling  each  word  and  of  the 
number  of  errors.  It  is  obvious  that  the  efficiency  of  a 
subject  in  performing  such  a  task  depends  upon  both  the 
speed  and  the  accuracy  with  which  it  is  accomplished;  the 
greater  the  speed  and  the  fewer  the  mistakes,  the  higher  the 
efficiency.  If  this  efficiency  is  represented  by  the  product 
of  the  time  in  which  a  unit  of  the  task  is  performed  by  the 
number  of  errors  made,  the  lower  product  will  denote  the 
greater  efficiency.  These  products  for  the  six  subjects  who 
performed  this  test  will  be  found  in  column  5  of  Table  II. 


OBJECTIVE  TEST  FOR  VERBAL  IMAGERY  TYPES  45 

It  will  be  seen  that,  with  the  exception  of  R,  the  lower 
product  corresponds  in  every  case  with  the  higher  sum  total 
of  verbal  imagery  recorded  in  column  4,  the  correlation 
without  R  being  -f-  0.90.  This  shows  that  efficiency  in  this 
test  is  proportional  to  the  total  amount  possessed  by  the 
subject  of  verbal  imagery  of  types  useful  in  performing  the 
task.  R  reported  that  he  employed  visual  imagery  alone  for 
this  test  because  he  believed  it  would  increase  his  speed.  As 
he  possessed  the  strongest  auditory  imagery  of  the  six  subjects 
and  as  the  trial  series  showed  him  to  have  about  the  weakest 
visual  imagery,  he  should  have  employed  auditory  imagery  or 
a  combination  of  both,  rather  than  visual  imagery. 

After  spelling  backward,  each  subject  was  asked  to  copy 
fifteen  long  nonsense  words  of  from  twelve  to  twenty-eight 
letters,  to  make  a  dash  every  time  he  looked  at  the  copy,  and 
to  report  how  he  copied  these  words.  The  experimenter 
kept  a  record  of  the  time  spent  in  copying  each  word  and  of 
the  number  of  errors.  Column  6  of  Table  II.  gives  the  relative 
efficiency  of  the  subjects  in  this  test,  this  being  the  product 
of  the  average  time  in  seconds  it  took  the  subject  to  copy 
each  word  by  the  average  number  of  mistakes  per  word;  and, 
as  in  the  spelling  backward  test,  the  lower  the  product,  the 
greater  the  efficiency.  With  the  exception  of  R,  the  lower 
product  corresponds  closely  with  the  higher  sum  total  of 
verbal  imagery,  the  correlation  being  +  0.94  without  R.  R 
employed  auditory  imagery  alone,  looking  at  the  first  twelve 
words  but  once  and  spelling  them  as  he  pronounced  them. 
As  long  groups  of  consonants  made  it  impossible  to  pronounce 
these  words,  he  naturally  made  many  mistakes. 

After  copying  these  long  words,  each  subject  was  asked 
to  copy  two  or  three  lines  of  each  of  six  type-written  selections, 
arranged  in  the  following  ways:  perverted,  backward  per- 
verted, inverted,  backward  inverted,  perverted  and  inverted, 
and  backward  perverted  and  inverted.  By  backward  I 
mean  spelled  from  right  to  left  instead  of  from  left  to  right. 
By  perverted  I  mean  written  so  as  to  be  read  in  a  mirror. 
By  inverted  I  mean  written  so  as  to  be  read  by  one  facing 
the  writer.  The  subjects  introspected  as  in  the  previous 


46  SAMUEL  D.  ROBBINS 

tests,  and  the  experimenter  kept  a  record  of  the  time  it  took 
to  copy  each  line  and  of  the  number  of  mistakes.  Column  7 
of  Table  II.  gives  the  relative  efficiency  of  subjects  in  this 
test.  This  efficiency  is  denoted  by  the  product  of  the  average 
time  per  line  in  minutes  by  the  total  number  of  mistakes; 
and  here  again  the  less  the  product,  the  greater  the  efficiency. 
With  the  exception  of  T,  the  lower  product  corresponds  in 
every  case  with  the  higher  sum  total  of  verbal  imagery,  the 
correlation  being  -j-  0.90  even  with  T  included.  T  used  an  un- 
fortunate method  on  the  first  line  which  caused  him  to  make 
nearly  as  many  mistakes  as  he  made  on  the  other  twelve  lines 
combined;  when  this  one  line  is  discarded,  his  score  becomes 
practically  equal  to  D's. 

After  copying  these  unusual  kinds  of  printing,  the  subject 
was  asked  to  write  'United  States  of  America'  so  that  it 
would  be  read  normally  by  a  person  facing  him;  'Harvard 
University'  so  that  it  would  be  read  normally  through  the 
paper  without  inverting  it;  'Cambridge,  Massachusetts'  so 
that  it  would  be  read  normally  through  the  paper  inverted; 
and  'European  War'  so  that  it  would  be  read  forward  through 
the  paper  without  inverting  it  but  with  each  letter  perverted. 
The  subject  introspected  as  before  and  the  experimenter 
kept  a  record  of  the  time  required  to  write  each  phrase  and 
of  the  number  of  errors.  Column  8  of  Table  II.  gives  the 
relative  efficiency  of  the  subjects  in  this  test.  Here  the 
product  of  the  average  time  per  letter  in  seconds  by  the 
total  number  of  mistakes  gives  the  efficiency;  so,  as  usual, 
the  smaller  product  denotes  the  greater  efficiency.  With 
the  exception  of  the  women,  who  found  this  test  far  more 
difficult  than  did  the  men,  there  is  a  fairly  good  correlation, 
+  0.83,  between  the  efficiency  of  each  subject  in  this  test  and 
his  total  verbal  imagery  score. 

As  all  of  the  spelling,  copying,  and  writing  tests  just 
described  require  the  cooperation  of  auditory,  kinaesthetic, 
and  visual  verbal  imagery,  the  high  correlation  between  the 
efficiency  of  a  subject  in  these  tests  and  his  total  verbal 
imagery  score  (which  is  the  sum  of  the  scores  of  the  separate 
types  of  verbal  imagery  used  by  a  majority  of  the  subjects  in 


OBJECTIVE   TEST  FOR   VERBAL  IMAGERY  TYPES  47 

performing  each  of  these  tasks),  shows  that  the  efficiency  of 
subjects  in  performing  a  given  task  is  proportional,  approxi- 
mately, to  the  sum  of  the  scores  of  the  separate  types  of 
verbal  imagery  commonly  employed  in  performing  that  task. 
Any  one  wishing  to  use  a  similar  but  shorter  test  can 
score  auditory  imagery  by  reading  aloud  to  his  subjects  thirty 
cards  such  as  I  used  containing  the  following  vowel  changes: 
koss-kose,  nume-nurm,  dack-dake,  girn-gine,  neff-neaf,  afc- 
ofe,  eag-oag,  ane-une,  ipe-epe,  fese-fose,  bose-buse,  nafe-nufe, 
vife-vefe,  obe-ube,  zoke-zake;  ank-enk,  ald-uld,  nef-naf, 
ilt-ult,  nop-nep,  baf-bof,  eft-uft,  ilm-ulm,  zep-zop,  alk-olk, 
maz-muz,  oln-uln,  mev-muv,  tig-teg,  zab-zib.  These  cards 
should  be  well  shuffled  with  one  another  and  with  a  second 
group  containing  at  least  twenty  consonant  changes  which 
give  a  distinctly  different  kinaesthetic  impression  such  as  the 
following:  ubs-uds,  vab-vad,  nis-niz,  gem-gen,  bis-tis,  vot-vob, 
sef-zef,  tov-pov,  ips-ids,  zup-zut,  pax-dax,  mub-nub,  abf-atf, 
ost-ozt,  emk-enk.  These  groups  should  then  be  repeated 
after  the  experimenter,  and  in  the  case  of  the  kinaesthetic 
score  the  record  should  be  kept  only  of  those  consonant 
changes  detected  that  were  not  noticed  when  the  experi- 
menter first  read  the  second  group.  The  third  group,  used 
for  scoring  visual  imagery,  should  contain  at  least  ten  non- 
sense words  which  are  spelled  differently  yet  pronounced 
alike  such  as  mije-mige,  bick-bik,  fis-fiss,  gax-gaks,  veet-veat, 
doxe-doax,  klab-clab,  zoll-zol,  boze-bose,  sibe-cibe.  After 
the  subject  has  thus  repeated  the  first  and  second  groups 
after  the  experimenter,  the  third  group  should  be  shuffled  with 
ten  pairs  from  other  groups  and  exposed  in  a  tachistoscope 
long  enough  for  the  subject  to  read  each  card  aloud.  The 
experiment  should  be  conducted  and  the  results  scored  as 
outlined  at  the  beginning  of  this  report. 

SUMMARY 

1.  Women  possess  more  vivid  verbal  imagery  than  men. 

2.  Long  vowels  receive  more  attention  than  any  other 
letters. 

3.  Short  vowels  receive  much  less  attention  than  do  long 
vowels. 


48  SAMUEL  D.  ROBBINS 

4.  Consonants  receive  less  attention  than  vowels. 

5.  A  change  of  one  letter  in  a  pair  of  nonsense  words  can 
be  detected  most  readily  if  the  subject  reads  the  words  aloud 
from  copy. 

6.  Those  persons  will  perform  a  given  mental  task  most 
efficiently  who  possess  the  most  vivid  types  of  verbal  imagery 
commonly  employed  to  accomplish  that  task. 


NOTE  ON  THE  VERBAL  IMAGERY  OF  STAM- 
MERERS AND  NORMAL  SPEAKERS.1 

I  stated  that  the  subject  of  vowel  versus  consonant  changes 
would  be  discussed  in  a  later  paper  comparing  the  verbal 
imagery  of  normal  speakers  with  that  of  stammerers.  As  my 
experiment  shows  that  the  average  verbal  imagery  for  twelve 
normal  speakers  and  twelve  stammerers  is  practically  iden- 
tical, a  brief  note  will  suffice  to  summarize  my  results. 

The  same  objective  test  described  in  the  above  named 
article  was  given  to  four  additional  speakers,  two  of  them  men, 
and  two  women,  and  to  twelve  stammerers,  six  of  them  men, 
and  six  women;  and  the  average  score  for  the  twelve  normal 
subjects  and  the  twelve  stammering  subjects  was  compiled  as 
in  my  earlier  article. 

The  average  change  score  showed  that  the  stammerers  de- 
tected changes  a  very  little  ^better  than  the  normal  speakers 
when  the  card  pairs  were  read  to  them,  1.7  compared  with  1.6, 
and  that  the  normal  speakers  detected  changes  a  little  more 
readily  when  they  looked  at  the  card  pairs  and  whispered 
them,  2.0  compared  with  1.8.  They  averaged  the  same,  1.5, 
when  they  repeated  the  card  pairs  after  the  experimenter,  and 
averaged  the  same,  1.7,  when  all  three  methods  of  presenta- 
tion were  averaged  together. 

The  vividness  of  each  subject's  visual,  kinaesthetic,  and 
auditory  verbal  imagery  was  determined  as  in  the  earlier  paper 
and  the  stammerers  and  normal  speakers  were  found  to  have 
the  same  average  auditory  imagery,  2.2,  and  the  same  average 
kinaesthetic  imagery,  0.8.  The  visual  verbal  imagery  of  the 

1  Prepared  after  the  article  was  in  type. 


OBJECTIVE  TEST  FOR  VERBAL  IMAGERY  TYPES  49 

stammerers  was  but  75  per  cent,  of  that  of  the  normal  speakers, 
however,  1.2  compared  with  1.6.  As  few  persons  employ 
visual  verbal  imagery  to  any  extent  in  speech,  there  is  obvi- 
ously nothing  in  verbal  imagery  of  any  kind  to  account  for 
stammering.  There  is  a  suggestion,  however,  that  certain 
letters  may  attract  the  stammerer's  attention  unduly;  this 
problem  I  am  now  investigating.  The  following  facts  came 
out  in  this  investigation. 

The  stammerers  did  not  detect  the  long  vowel  changes  so 
readily  as  the  normal  speakers,  2.4  compared  with  2.7  in  the 
listening  test  and  2.2  compared  with  2.6  in  the  repeating  test; 
yet  they  detected  the  short  vowel  changes  more  readily,  1.9 
compared  with  1.6  in  the  listening  test  and  1.7  compared  with 
1.4  in  the  repeating  test. 

Averaging  the  three  series  composed  of  the  three  types  of 
vowel  changes  I  found  that  the  stammerers  and  normal  speakers 
scored  alike,  2.2,  on  the  listening  tests,  and  that  the  stammer- 
ers did  not  do  quite  so  •well  as  the  normal  speakers  on  the  re- 
peating tests,  1.9  compared  with  2.1,  or  on  the  whispering 
tests,  2.4  compared  with  2.5. 

Averaging  the  three  series  composed  of  the  three  types  of 
consonant  changes  I  found  that  the  stammerers  excelled  in  the 
listening  tests,  1.15  compared  with  0.95,  and  on  the  repeating 
tests,  1.05  compared  with  0.95,  but  scored  only  1.44  compared 
with  the  normal  speakers'  score  of  1.68  on  the  whispering  tests, 
the  difference  being  due,  no  doubt,  to  the  better  visual  imagery 
of  the  normal  speakers.  The  average  for  the  three  methods  of 
presentation  was  the  same  for  normal  speakers  and  stammer- 
ers, 1.19.  The  maximum  and  the  minimum  scores  averaged 
the  same  for  stammerers  and  normal  speakers  in  the  vowel 
changes  and  the  maximums  averaged  the  same  in  the  con- 
sonant changes,  but  the  normal  speakers'  minimums  averaged 
twice  as  low  as  the  stammerers  in  the  consonant  changes.  It 
would  seem,  therefore,  that  stammerers  pay  more  attention  to 
consonants  than  do  normal  speakers;  this  is  confirmed  by  the 
work  I  have  done  in  connection  with  the  correction  of  stam- 
mering. 


BY  J.  R.  KANTOR 

University  of  Chicago 

Recent  developments  in  the  study  of  human  behavior 
make  it  possible  to  begin  a  reinterpretation  of  instincts  and 
related  phenomena  which  today  admittedly  constitute  the 
darkest  chapter  in  psychology.  In  this  paper  the  writer 
attempts  to  suggest  a  functional  interpretation  of  human 
instincts  and  their  integration  into  instinctive  conduct. 
The  functional  psychologist  aims  to  start  from  an  unbiased 
naturalistic  standpoint  and  therefore  hopes  to  achieve  some 
progress  in  the  understanding  of  some  of  the  adaptationai 
equipment  of  human  beings.  At  the  very  inception  of  such 
a  study  we  observe  the  imperative  necessity  for  a  scrupulous 
discrimination  between  the  acts  which  are  properly  called 
instincts,  and  the  more  complex  reactions  developed  from 
them  which  we  will  call  instinctive  conduct  or  behavior. 


The  Nature  of  an  Instinct. — An  instinct  is  a  comparatively 
simple  and  direct  response  to  a  specific  stimulating  object  or 
condition.  It  is  in  fact  the  functioning  of  a  connate  potential 
reaction  system1  which  is  organized  from  simple  psychophysio- 
logical  dispositions  or  tendencies  to  respond  to  stimuli. 
That  instincts  are  so  highly  spontaneous  may  be  accounted 
for  by  the  fact  that  the  specific  way  in  which  the  reaction 
system  functions,  depends  upon  the  stimulating  conditions. 
It  is  this  moulding  of  the  response  by  the  surrounding  con- 

1 A  reaction  system  is  a  complex  function  involving  cognitive,  conative,  affective, 
muscular,  glandular  and  neural  factors.  Cf.  Kantor,  'Conscious  Behavior  and  the 
Abnormal,'  /.  of  Abnorm.  Psychol.,  Aug.,  1918.  An  example  of  a  reaction  system  is  the 
response,  'August,  1914'  (with  all  its  accompanying  organic  resonances)  to  the  stimula- 
tion, 'when  did  the  hostilities  of  the  great  European  War  begin?'  This  response  is 
potential  in  all  those  who  have  acquired  the  informational  reaction. 

50 


HUMAN  INSTINCTS  S1 

ditions  which  is  the  source  of  the  many  marvellous  tales  of 
intelligence  among  the  lower  animals. 

An  instinct  being  a  primary  act  and  therefore  entirely 
"undebauched  by  learning,"  must  be  looked  upon  as  one 
of  the  primary  functional  elements  in  the  embryological 
development  of  the  human  organism.  For  the  instinctive 
reaction  patterns  are  functions  of  animal  adaptation  de- 
veloped from  the  simple  functions  of  organized  matter.1 
Owing  to  this  development  instincts  may  be  classified  as 
(i)  food-getting,  and  waste  eliminating  responses,  (2) 
sexual  reactions,  (3)  expressive  acts,  and  (4)  protective 
responses.  These  classes  represent  specific  adaptations  to 
particular  adjustment-situations,  that  is  to  say  concrete 
actions,  and  with  the  random  movements  and  reflexes  form 
the  matrix  of  the  entire  series  of  human  behavior. 

The  function  of  human  instincts  is  to  adapt  the  person 
to  the  various  surroundings  in  which  he  is  found,  pending  the 
development  of  the  intelligent  responses  usually  required 
for  such  adaptations.  These  modes  of  instinctive  response 
develop  in  the  species  of  organism  during  its  interaction  with 
its  environment;  consequently  there  is  an  entirely  natural 
genesis  of  the  instincts  paralleling  the  growth  of  the  human 
being  in  the  evolutionary  course  of  the  animal  species  to 
which  he  belongs.  Every  organism  possesses  a  series  of 
these  reaction  systems  which  in  the  presence  of  adequate 
stimuli  become  responses.  The  response  and  the  stimulus 
together  constitute  an  act,  that  is  to  say,  a  specific  adaptation. 
From  a  definitively  psychological  standpoint  the  individual 
at  any  particular  moment  is  this  series  of  reaction  systems. 

If  we  have  correctly  described  the  origin  and  development 
of  instincts,  we  have  sufficiently  indicated  that  the  instincts 
of  the  human  organism  are  very  different  from  those  of  the 
lower  animals.  The  reaction  systems,  as  the  units  of  the 
organism  on  the  action  side,  must  naturally  be  just  as 
diverse  in  dissimilar  organisms  as  are  the  structural  parts. 
Thus  we  find  differences  of  a  wider  or  narrower  sort  in  both 
the  mental  and  physiological  factors  of  the  specific  functions. 

1  These  are  usually  described  by  the  zoologist  as  irritability,  metabolUm,  repro- 
duction, motility,  etc. 


52  /.  R.  KANTOR 

Obviously,  the  most  striking  variation  between  human  and 
animal  instincts  is  the  extreme  modifiability  of  the  former. 
In  fact,  human  instincts  are  so  distinctly  transitory  in  char- 
acter that  they  disappear  very  early  from  the  reaction  equip- 
ment of  the  human  organism,  and  in  the  adult  individual  are 
completely  absent.  These  human  instincts  become  inte- 
grated into  more  complex  types  of  responses,  while  the  animal 
instincts  remain  as  permanent  acquisitions  of  the  organism, 
and  change  only  by  becoming  more  adaptable  through  prac- 
tice to  the  situations  in  which  they  frequently  function. 

The  Nature  of  Instinctive  Behavior. — In  contrast  to  the 
instincts,  instinctive  conduct  comprises  adjustments  which 
are  essentially  acquired  tendencies  of  response,  and  in  most 
cases  constitute  intelligent  behavior.  It  must  be  noted, 
however,  that  the  reaction  systems  of  instinctive  conduct, 
which,  by  the  way,  include  the  greatest  portion  of  our  actual 
responses,  are  developed  as  elaborations  of  a  prominent  core  of 
organized  innate  reaction  patterns.  In  all  cases  of  instinctive 
conduct  we  have  integrations  of  concrete  human  acts;  so 
that  if,  for  example,  we  start  with  the  walking  act  of  a  child, 
the  exigencies  of  the  surrounding  conditions  may  condition 
that  initial  act  to  become  a  locomotor  response  to  the  call  of 
the  parents,  or  to  any  other  stimulating  circumstance  acting 
upon  our  illustrative  child.  The  results  of  observations  of 
human  behavior  demonstrate  that  the  rapidity  and  com- 
plexity of  the  integrations  are  owing  to  the  responsiveness  of 
surrounding  objects;  that  is  to  say,  a  responsive  object 
forces  the  individual  to  apprehend  the  possibility  and  neces- 
sity of  varying  his  response,  and  therefore  to  learn  to  react 
with  a  meaningful  behavior  to  the  stimulating  response  of 
the  other  object.  This  sort  of  interaction  with  the  environ- 
ment constitutes  the  basis  for  social  phenomena  of  various 
types  and  is  excellently  illustrated  by  the  constant  inter- 
stimulation  between  two  boys  during  the  preliminaries  of  a 
fistic  combat.  In  this  situation  each  individual  is  intently 
posed  in  an  anticipatory  attitude,  requiring  only  the  slightest 
sign  of  change  in  position  on  the  part  of  the  opponent  as  an 
effective  stimulus  to  bring  about  a  telling  response.  When 


HUMAN  INSTINCTS  53 

we  recall  that  a  single  individual  can  serve  both  as  stimulating 
and  responding  object  we  can  appreciate  the  importance  of 
this  self-stimulation  as  a  factor  in  the  rapid  integration  of 
the  simpler  forms  of  behavior. 

Since  the  natural  environment  of  the  human  organism 
consists  primarily  of  responsive  objects  we  see  why  the  human 
adult  has  no  instincts,  that  is,  performs  no  acts  which  are 
actualizations  of  exclusively  innate  dispositions,  but  always 
responds  with  a  partially  acquired  reaction  pattern.  The 
view  that  man  has  more  instincts  than  the  lower  animals,  for 
which  James1  is  in  part  responsible,  could  only  obtain  credence 
so  long  as  the  precise  nature  of  a  conscious  act  remained  un- 
analyzed.  That  James  did  not  entirely  ignore  the  facts 
concerning  instinctive  conduct  is  manifested  by  his  observa- 
tion that  human  instincts  do  not  remain  blind.2  The  phy- 
siological viewpoint,  which  always  influenced  James,  pre- 
vented him  from  fully  appreciating  the  psychological  changes 
which  transform  instincts  into  more  complex  actions.  To 
think  of  the  non-rational  activities  of  the  human  organism  in 
terms  of  reflexes  which  are  somehow  coupled  with  impulses, 
means  the  capricious  disavowal  of  the  variety  and  richness 
of  the  instinctive  forms  of  behavior. 

The  contrast  between  instincts  and  instinctive  behavior 
is  made  clearer  by  dispelling  somewhat  the  confusion  existing 
in  the  conception  of  the  differences  between  the  instincts  and 
the  more  simple  reflexes  which  differ  widely  from  the  former 
in  organization  and  function.  The  reflex  action  involves 
the  functioning  of  a  more  definite  and  fixed  reaction  system 
than  does  the  instinct,  and  the  result  of  the  stimulation  is  a 
genetically  simpler  form  of  behavior.  The  relative  rigidity 
of  the  reflex  response  allows  comparatively  little  room  for 
adjustment  between  the  organism  and  the  stimulating 
conditions  while  the  action  system  is  functioning. 

Further,  it  has  been  frequently  observed  that  instincts 
involve  a  much  larger  conscious  function  than  is  the  case 
with  reflexes,8  since  the  latter  are  on  the  whole  much  simpler, 

i  Cf.  'Principles,'  pp.  393,  441. 

*  Ibid.,  390. 

» Stout,  'Manual  of  Psychology,'  1915,  p.  343. 


54  /•  R-  KANTOR 

but  we  must  guard  against  the  idea  that  reflexes  are  merely 
neuro-muscular  actions.1  While  Stout  is  entirely  correct  in 
his  assertion  that  *  instinctive  conduct  does,  and  reflex  action 
does  not  presuppose  the  cooperation  of  intelligent  conscious- 
ness,' he  is  mistaken  in  supposing  that  the  absence  of  intelli- 
gent consciousness  implies  the  complete  absence  of  a  conscious 
factor  in  the  response.2  Instincts  and  reflexes  imply,  then, 
the  functioning  of  two  distinct  types  of  connate  reaction 
patterns,  both  of  which  are  to  be  distinguished  from  instinctive 
conduct  which  is  never  the  functioning  of  a  purely  innate 
reaction  pattern,  although  it  is  to  a  certain  degree  developed 
always  from  instincts. 

II 

The  Range  of  Instinctive  Conduct. — The  distinction  be- 
tween instinctive  conduct  and  instincts  paves  the  way  for 
the  consideration  of  the  large  place  which  the  former  holds 
in  human  life.  We  have  already  suggested  that  most  of 
our  ordinary  behavior  is  instinctive  conduct,  but  this  does 
not  mean  in  any  sense  that  complex  actions  such  as  we  perform 
are  the  expressions  of  a  few  inborn  impulses.  Such  a  manner 
of  thinking  represents  a  vestige  of  scholastic  simplicity  which 
is  genuinely  subversive  of  all  understanding  of  human 
behavior.  What  is  meant  is  that  even  our  very  complex 
actions  are  in  great  measure  conditioned  by  the  instincts  from 
which  they  have  developed.  To  be  sure,  the  simplest 
instinctive  conduct  is  very  largely  the  functioning  of  an 
innate  reaction  system,  although  conditioned  by  acquired 
factors.  The  proportion  of  innateness  in  the  reaction  pattern 
is  measured  by  the  directness  of  the  connection  between  the 
stimulus  and  the  response,  or  in  other  words  by  the  character 
of  the  appreciation  which  the  individual  has  of  the  meaning 
or  significance  of  the  stimulating  object.  In  the  simplest 
case  the  meaning  of  the  object  does  not  emerge  as  a  striking 
factor  in  the  act;  it  merely  represents  a  modification  in  the 
response  owing  to  a  previous  contact  with  the  stimulating 
object.  In  a  general  way,  we  may  very  properly  consider 

1  Cf.  Stout,  Brit.  J.  of  Psychol,  3,  p.  244. 

*  Stout's  separation  of  the  conscious  and  movement  components  of  a  response 
clearly  exemplifies  the  difference  between  his  position  and  a  functional  viewpoint. 


HUMAN  INSTINCTS  55 

the  simplest  instinctive  behavior  as  called  out  by  the  environ- 
ment, and  largely  controlled  by  it,  and  not  by  the  organism. 
As  examples  we  may  quote  all  those  activities  usually  de- 
scribed by  psychologists  as  subconscious  or  unconscious, 
which  are  very  prominent  in  manual  learning,  and  technical 
operations  of  all  sorts. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  more  complex  instinctive  conduct 
is  more  independent  of  the  stimulating  object  and  includes 
in  its  reaction  systems  a  larger  component  of  acquired  factors. 
Here  the  meaning  of  the  object  serving  as  a  definite  foresight 
of  the  act,  functions  in  a  more  precise  manner,  and  in  still 
more  developed  behavior  includes  an  effective  appreciation 
of  the  consequences  of  past  responses  to  stimulating  objects. 
The  instinctive  behavior  at  this  stage  may  involve  an  elab- 
orate series  of  memorial  and  thought  functions,  and  when  so 
complicated  its  specific  characteristic  as  an  instinctive  be- 
havior is  the  fact  that  it  is  perceptually  stimulated,  that  is, 
the  act  is  not  initiated  by  a  problematic  situation.  In  this 
last  class  we  may  place  all  the  involved  social  behavior  which 
constitutes  many  of  our  daily  responses.  We  must  conclude, 
then,  that  instinctive  conduct  composes  a  considerable 
portion  of  practically  all  adjustments  from  the  simplest  to 
the  most  complex. 

The  Intelligence  in  Instinctive  Behavior. — We  may  sum 
up  the  essential  characteristics  of  instinctive  behavior  by 
pointing  out  the  invariable  presence  in  it  of  at  least  the  rudi- 
ments of  intelligence.  Thus  in  many  cases  the  reaction 
system,  although  a  response  to  an  immediately  presented 
perceptual  stimulus,  is  still  carried  out  by  predominantly 
acquired  reaction  factors,  as  is  convincingly  exemplified  by 
much  of  our  socially  restricted  behavior.  Such  acts  are 
spontaneous  responses  to  definite  perceptual  stimuli,  but 
they  are  performed  in  roundabout  ways  and  in  many  instances 
tend  toward  concealment.  The  openness  and  frankness  with 
which  such  acts  are  originally  performed  are  by  virtue  of 
social  disapproval  more  or  less  successfully  repressed. 

Distinction  of  Instinctive  from  Rational  Conduct. — The 
great  variety  and  complexity  of  instinctive  responses  make 


56  J.  R.  KANTOR 

it  necessary  to  distinguish  them  from  rational  acts,  a  dis- 
crimination which  is  all  the  more  pertinent  when  we  consider 
that  in  the  final  analysis  all  of  our  acquired  reaction  systems 
are  at  some  level  integrations  of  elementary  instinct  acts. 
As  a  response  to  a  problematic  situation  the  rational  act  is 
probably  always  initiated  by  an  indirect  stimulating  object 
through  some  highly  developed  meaning  function.  Unlike 
complex  instinctive  behavior  the  rational  act  is  not  only 
guided  to  its  conclusion  by  intelligent  functions,  but  is 
originated  by  a  reflective  consideration  of  ways  and  means. 
Thus  it  becomes  the  basis  for  all  transformative  conduct, 
that  is,  action  which  remakes  the  environmental  conditions 
through  some  function  of  creative  imagination,  while  in  the 
case  of  instinctive  conduct  the  result  is  usually  merely  an 
adaptation  to  those  conditions. 

Ill 

The  Specificity  of  Instincts. — Whether  or  not  instincts 
are  specific  in  their  functioning  is  a  crucial  inquiry  for  the 
understanding  of  them,  and  a  problem  which  may  throw 
considerable  light  upon  the  distinction  between  instinctive 
behavior  and  instincts.  It  is  important  to  note  that  since 
instincts  are  simple  and  immediate  responses  to  specific 
stimuli  which  bring  innate  action  systems  into  function, 
they  presumably  must  be  specific  in  their  results. 

This  view,  however,  is  not  generally  held  by  psychologists, 
although  some  adhere  to  it  so  tenaciously  that  the  obser- 
vation of  the  indeterminateness  and  indefiniteness  of  human 
behavior  influences  them  to  deny  the  existence  of  instincts 
in  the  human  being.  While  it  is  entirely  demonstrable  that 
mature  persons  possess  no  instincts,  this  must  not  be  inter- 
preted to  mean,>s  Stout  does,  that  human  behavior  in  general 
has  no  instinctive  foundation  in  the  form  of  concrete  action 
patterns.1  To  believe  in  the  absence  of  instincts  in  the  human 

1  Our  interpretation  of  Stout's  position  is  in  no  wise  invalidated  by  his  reluctant 
inclination,  expressed  in  the  third  edition  of  his  'Manual'  (p.  360),  to  make  the  term 
instinct  refer  to  general  capacities,  such  as  'innately  organized  interest,'  'attention,' 
and  'power  of  learning  by  experience  in  certain  directions.'  On  this  basis  he  asserts 
that  'the  whole  development  of  human  minds  has  its  root  in  connate  tendencies  of  this 
sort  and  is  inexplicable  apart  from  them.'  From  our  standpoint  in  appears  that 
Stout  is  here  avoiding  the  essential  problem  of  instincts. 


HUMAN  INSTINCTS  57 

individual  because  instinctive  conduct  is  contrasted  with 
intelligent  conduct  is  to  overlook  entirely  the  facts  (i)  that 
we  are  studying  concrete  conscious  behavior,  and  for  that 
reason  we  need  not  think  of  an  instinct  as  a  permanent  spring 
of  action,  the  absence  of  which  at  the  present  time  indicates 
that  it  was  never  present;  and  (2)  that  intelligent  behavior  is 
developed  by  the  integration  of  simple  types  of  action,  a  fact 
which  enables  us  to  understand  how  the  reaction  pattern  of  an 
instinct  becomes  elaborated  and  developed  into  a  complex 
intelligent  response. 

An  inquiry  into  the  views  entertained  concerning  the 
definiteness  of  instincts  reveals  the  fact  that  what  is  frequently 
meant  by  an  instinct  is  a  neuro-muscular  function.  Thus 
Stout,  for  example,  describes  an  instinct  as  a  "purely  biologi- 
cal adaptation  comparable  to  the  prearrangement  of  structure 
and  function  which  in  human  beings  subserves  the  digestion 
of  food."1  Upon  examining  this  conception  we  are  impressed 
with  its  inadequacy  to  represent  human  behavior,  although 
we  are  in  hearty  agreement  with  Stout  in  rejecting  such  a 
view  as  that  of  Bergson-Carr,  stated  by  Stout  as  the  belief 
that  there  is  a  special  form  of  psychical  activity  which  re- 
quires the  technical  name  of  instinct.2  We  insist  that  not 
because  human  behavior  has  no  instinctive  basis  do  we  not 
find  instincts,  but  because  the  latter  have  become  developed 
into  intelligent  behavior  in  the  course  of  the  individual's 
contact  with  his  surrounding  conditions.  This  fact  Stout 
could  have  seen  had  he  not  been  prevented  by  his  general 
psychological  standpoint  from  appreciating  that  the  psy- 
chologist is  interested  in  modes  of  response  to  stimuli,  and 
not  in  expressions  of  mentality.  Apparently,  Stout  assumes 
the  specificity  of  instincts,  and  from  such  a  premise  he 
concludes  that  there  are  no  instincts  in  the  adult  human 
being  because  he  does  not  find  man  performing  acts  which 
express  a  mental  process,  through  innately  coordinated  motor 
mechanisms.3  Stout  consequently  fails  to  appreciate  the 

1  Brit.  J.  of  Psychol.,  3,  243. 

*Ibid. 

»  Cf.  McDougall,  Brit.  J.  of  Psychol.,  3,  269  ff. 


58  .      /.  R.  KANTOR 

large  place  which  instinctive  conduct  plays  in  the  life  of  the 
human  individual. 

When  we  turn  to  the  work  of  Thorndike,1  who  is  attempt- 
ing to  investigate  the  *  original  nature  of  man/  we  find  much 
to  commend  in  his  description  of  the  specific  instinct  re- 
sponses. Beginning  with  the  admirable  intention  to  describe 
concrete  facts  of  behavior,  he  scouts  the  viewpoint  which 
makes  of  instincts  generalized  tendencies  to  bring  about  some 
vague  result  presumed  to  be  beneficial  to  the  organism.2 
Thorndike  stands  upon  firm  scientific  ground  when  he  looks 
upon  instincts  as  specific  types  of  unlearned  responses  to 
definite  kinds  of  stimulating  situations,  but  his  work  presents 
us  with  grave  difficulties.  Conceived  in  neuro-biological 
terms,  it  implies  that  man's  'original  nature'  remains  forever 
a  prominent  part  of  his  behavior  equipment.  From  this 
fact  arise  several  implications  tending  to  misconstrue  the 
actual  character  of  instinctive  behavior. 

In  the  first  place,  such  a  viewpoint  cannot  escape  the 
implication  that  the  human  individual  acts  precisely  as  does 
the  animal,  since  the  former  is  fitted  with  a  similar  sort  of 
neuro-muscular  structure,  and  secondly,  a  more  serious  diffi- 
culty is  that  such  a  position  leaves  no  room  for  the  develop- 
ment of  behavior. 

The  first  difficulty  must  be  understood  as  referring  to 
the  obvious  faultiness  of  the  attitude  that  human  behavior  is 
permanently  like  that  of  the  lower  animals.  It  is  true  that  in 
the  case  of  infants  the  acts  are  like  those  of  the  simpler  or- 
ganisms, but  this  is  because  we  are  observing  simple  in- 
stincts. In  older  children  and  adults  the  behavior  has 
become  integrated  into  intelligent  conduct  and  is  thus  quali- 
tatively different. 

In  answer  to  the  possible  reply  of  Thorndike  that  a  suffi- 
cient differentiation  of  conduct  in  man  and  animals  is  allowed 
for  by  the  combination  of  neural  elements,  we  might  suggest 
that  such  a  way  out  of  the  difficulty  would  only  result  in 
describing  complex  abstractions  instead  of  observable  be- 
havior. Human  conduct  is  infinitely  more  complex  in  every 

1  Educational  Psychol.,  1913,  Vol.  i. 

2  Cf.  James  ('Principles,'  1890,  II.,  183),  whom  Thorndike  follows. 


HUMAN  INSTINCTS  59 

phase  of  adaptational  character  than  can  be  accounted  for 
on  the  basis  of  the  combination  of  neural  elements.  Ob- 
viously the  neural  connections  are  essential  mechanisms  in 
all  behavior,  and  since  the  activities  of  man  are  more  complex 
than  those  of  animals,  these  mechanisms  must  necessarily 
be  more  elaborate,  but  the  nervous  function  cannot  do 
anything  more  than  mediate  the  spontaneous  movements  of 
the  individual.1  It  is  because  the  neural  hypothesis  was 
developed  in  connection  with  work  on*  animal  instincts  that 
it  has  any  significance  as  an  explanatory  principle,  inasmuch 
as  the  animal  instincts  are  very  simple  activities  and  so 
lacking  in  intelligence  as  to  be  almost  mere  biological  func- 
tions. 

We  cannot  agree  with  Drever,2  who  is  essentially  a  follower 
of  McDougall,  in  his  criticism  that  the  lack  of  differentiation 
in  Thorndike's  theory  between  human  and  animal  instincts 
points  to  the  nonspecificity  of  instincts.  Drever  insists* 
that  there  is  no  genuine  specificity  in  Thorndike's  instincts, 
since,  for  example,  the  'instinct  to  escape  from  restraint*  is 
so  complex  as  to  involve  in  the  case  of  a  little  child  '  stiffening, 
writhing,  and  throwing  back  the  head  and  shoulders'  and 
in  the  older  child  also  'kicking,  pushing,  slapping,  scratching 
and  biting.'  Drever  declares  that  the  instincts  mentioned 
belong  with  the  six  others  enumerated  by  Thorndike4  under 
McDougall's  heading  of  pugnacity,  and  that  the  precise  factor 
of  unity  is  the  accompanying  emotion  of  anger.  As  a  further 
argument  against  the  specificity  of  instincts,  Drever  indicates 
that  in  some  cases  we  cannot  predict  what  a  specific  response 
will  be,  and  the  individual  may  try  many  different  ones  in 
succession.  Thus,  for  example,  under  some  conditions  of 
stimulation  the  person  may  respond  by  flight  or  concealment, 
and  in  some  cases  by  both  reactions  in  turn. 

1  It  is  unfortunate  that  psychologists  appear  to  overlook  the  fact  that  constructive 
biologists  do  not  think  in  terms  of  isolated  nerve  functions,  but  in  terms  of  neuro-mus- 
culo-glandular  systems.  In  this  connection  it  appears  that  if  Thorndike  has  avoided 
'mystic  potencies'  ('Educ.  Psychol.,'  p.  n)  he  has  done  so  only  by  translating  them 
into  neural  terms. 

1  'Instinct  in  Man,'  1917,  p.  155. 

» Op.  ft/.,  p.  166. 

4  Op.  cit.,  p.  68  ff. 


60  j.  JR.  KANTOR 

The  writer  is  satisfied  that  instead  of  proving  the  non- 
specificity  of  instincts,  what  Drever  really  shows  is  that 
human  beings  respond  only  by  means  of  instinctive  behavior 
and  not  with  instincts.  To  repeat,  instead  of  responding 
merely  with  an  innately  organized  reaction  system,  the 
individual  reacts  with  a  complex  acquired  reaction  pattern, 
which  in  the  course  of  his  development  has  had  an  increased 
knowledge  and  affective  factor  added  to  it.  It  is  for  this 
reason  that  the  anger  or  fighting  situation  calls  out  such  a 
wide  and  varying  series  of  actions.  In  order  to  explain  such 
conduct  it  is  entirely  unnecessary  to  invoke  a  dubious  inter- 
pretation involving  an  unwarranted  conception  of  the  nature 
and  function  of  the  emotions  as  Drever  following  McDougall 
does. 

Drever  seems  to  realize  that  human  behavior  is  a  com- 
plex function  developed  in  interaction  with  stimulating  cir- 
cumstances, when  he  writes  that  "behavior  will  be  largely 
determined,  first  of  all,  by  the  circumstances  of  the  case,  by 
what  kind  of  response  will  best  secure  safety.  It  will  be 
determined,  in  the  second  place,  by  the  intensity  of  the  fear 
aroused,  and  two  individuals  may  behave  in  two  entirely 
different  ways  in  response  to  the  same  situation,  according 
to  the  degree  of  fear  aroused."1  This  unimpeachable  obser- 
vation, which  certainly  controverts  Thorndike's  position 
that  an  instinct  (instinctive  behavior)  is  the  functioning  of  a 
neuro-muscular  apparatus,  should  have  led  Drever  to  see 
that  the  actions  which  he  quotes  from  Thorndike's  descrip- 
tion are  phases  of  intelligent  instinctive  conduct,  and  not 
the  expressions  of  a  mysterious  'general'  instinct.  Were 
Drever  thinking  in  terms  of  concrete  behavior  he  would 
easily  see  that  instinctive  conduct  is  not  the  functioning  of 
an  'end,'  or  'instinctive  impulse'  with  an  intelligence  entity 
to  carry  it  out,2  but  that  it  is  a  definite  response  to  a  stimulus 
which  involves  in  its  specific  mode  of  action  the  integration 
of  numerous  previous  experiences.  In  all  cases  of  actual 
instinctive  behavior  the  'end'  is  gratuitously  imposed  upon 

1  Op.  cit.,  p.  163. 
*  Ibid.,  p.  122  ff. 


HUMAN  INSTINCTS  61 

the  situation.1  What  actually  happens  is  that  at  any  par- 
ticular time  certain  combinations  of  surrounding  circum- 
stances stimulate  the  person  to  perform  definite  acts,  provided 
that  he  has  the  necessary  equipment  of  reaction  systems. 
The  adequate  consideration  of  the  stimulating  auspices  of 
behavior  entirely  removes  the  necessity  of  postulating  teleo- 
logical  powers  in  the  organism. 

The  spectator  may  profit  by  Drever's  attack  upon 
Thorndike's  position  by  observing  that  on  the  one  hand  in 
his  endeavor  to  avoid  "mystic  potencies"  Thorndike  refuses 
to  interpret  behavior  as  it  actually  occurs,  preferring  to  lean 
upon  unreal  if  not  mystic  potencies,  while  on  the  other, 
Drever,2  following  McDougall,3  describes  behavior  in  a  more 
acceptable  manner,  but  does  not  hesitate  to  explain  it  as  the 
result  of  metapsychological  agency. 

The  second  difficulty  with  Thorndike's  view  of  instincts, 
namely,  that  it  disregards  the  development  of  behavior,  may 
be  considered  as  a  derivation  from  the  first  difficulty.  It 
results  in  the  misinterpretation  of  human  action,  which  as 
we  have  seen  has  as  its  primary  characteristic  the  process 
of  integration.  A  critical  study  of  such  behavior  indicates 
conclusively  that  not  a  single  act  of  an  adult  person4  is  an 
original  response,  but  always  a  complex  development  of 
acquired  reaction  systems.  It  appears  that  Thorndike  must 
think  of  instincts  in  the  adult  as  drives  or  potencies  of  some 
sort,  that  is  to  say,  at  this  point  they  have  lost  their  specific 
character.  In  his  failure  to  distinguish  between  instincts 
and  instinctive  conduct  Thorndike  vitiates  his  original 
excellent  intention  to  describe  actual  psychological  occur- 
rences. Consequently,  his  interpretation  leaves  unfulfilled 

1  In  this  connection  it  is  extremely  edifying  to  observe  the  highly  moral  ends  that 
are  sometimes  imposed  upon  the  instincts,  such  as  'heavy  and  unremitting  toil  on 
behalf  of  the  offspring'  in  the  case  of  the  parental  instinct.     Cf.  McDougall,  'Soc. 
Psychol.,'  1916,  p.  269. 

2  "Instinct  is  the  'life  impulse'  becoming  conscious  as  determinate  conscious 
impulse,"  op.  «'/.,  p.  88. 

1  "For  I  hold  that  the  instincts  are  essentially  differentiations  of  the  will  to  live 
that  animates  all  organisms  and  whose  operation  in  them  makes  the  essential  difference 
between  their  psychophysical  activities  and  the  physical  processes  of  inorganic  nature." 
Brit.  J.  of  Psychol.,  3,  p.  258. 

4  Excluding  the  reflexes,  of  course. 


62  /.  R.  KANTOR 

his  original  functional  promise,  and  ignores  therefore  one  of 
the  extremely  important  factors  in  conscious  behavior, 
namely,  the  stimulating  circumstances.  In  not  allowing  for 
an  interpretation  of  the  actual  responses  which  an  organism 
makes  in  adapting  itself  to  surrounding  conditions,  Thorn- 
dike's  position  results  in  an  inert  structuralism  which  pro- 
longs the  intellectual  tradition  of  a  permanent  self.1 

The  most  zealous  advocate  of  the  non-specificity  of 
instincts  is  probably  McDougall  who  approaches  the  problem 
from  the  angle  of  social  behavior.  This  author,  impugns  the 
theory  of  social  action  which  assumes  'that  man  is  a  reason- 
able being  who  always  intelligently  seeks  his  own  good  and 
is  guided  in  all  his  activities  by  enlightened  self-interest.'2 
Unfortunately  McDougall's  easy  victory  over  such  a  vul- 
nerable position  has  resulted  in  his  substitution  of  another 
absolute  spring  of  action  as  the  basis  for  all  human  behavior, 
namely  the  series  of  instincts.  The  ubiquity  and  persistence 
of  certain  types  of  action  no  doubt  has  influenced  him  to 
propound  the  hypothesis  that  the  human  'mind'  is  consti- 
tuted by  the  sum  of  innate  tendencies  which  bring  about 
the  specific  actions  of  the  individual.  As  will  appear  in  the 
course  of  our  discussion  these  tendencies  McDougall  believes 
to  be  permanent  psychic  entities.  The  assumption  that 
instincts  are  the  'essential  springs  or  motive  powers  of  all 
thought  and  action'  necessarily  implies  therefore  that  they 
are  general  capacities  to  bring  about  certain  actions,  for 
otherwise  there  would  be  required  an  infinite  number  to 
account  for  all  the  variety  of  social  behavior.3  The  suppo- 
sition of  the  non-specificity  of  instincts  in  turn  creates  a 
presumption  in  favor  of  the  perseverance  of  dispositions  as 
permanent  tendencies  of  human  actions. 

An  impartial  investigation  of  behavior  clearly  demon- 
strates the  extravagance  of  assigning  any  absolute  foundation 
for  human  conduct.  Thus  for  example,  to  insist  upon 
instincts  as  the  exclusive  springs  of  action  is  to  lose  sight  of 

1  As  a  series  of  physiological  mechanisms. 
»'Soc.  Psychol.,'p.  ii. 

» "Lightly  to  postulate  an  indefinite  number  and  variety  of  human  instincts  is  a 
cheap  and  easy  way  to  solve  psychological  problems."  'Soc.  Psychol.,'  p.  26  ff. 


HUMAN  INSTINCTS  63 

the  actual  fact  that  many  human  actions  are  in  a  genuine 
sense  rationally  motived.  As  a  consequence  of  seeking  an 
absolute  factor  in  human  behavior,  McDougall  reaches  the 
same  result  as  Thorndike,  namely,  a  form  of  abstractionism 
which  adds  little  to  the  comprehension  of  such  behavior. 

The  impuissance  of  McDougall's  conception  of  instincts 
as  an  interpretation  of  conduct  is  instructively  intimated  in 
the  existence  of  an  uncrossable  barrier  between  his  exposition 
of  instincts  and  his  discussion  of  social  behavior.  Although 
he  starts  out  with  the  assertion  that  an  instinct  is  a  psycho- 
physical  disposition,  not  only  to  act  but  also  to  perceive, 
attend,  and  feel,  that  is  to  say,  a  concrete  action,1  he  really 
thinks  of  it  as  an  enduring  condition  or  faculty  of  some  sort.2 
The  hypostatic  nature  of  McDougall's  thinking  appears  in 
its  most  overt  form  in  his  protest  against  using  the  term  in- 
stinct to  denote  an  action.3  There  is  apparently  no  way  in 
which  such  instincts  can  develop  into  complex  social  behavior 
excepting  by  some  form  of  crude  mechanical  agglomeration. 

In  all  fairness  to  McDougall  it  must  be  said  that  he  realizes 
the  appalling  chasm  which  separates  his  instincts  from  the 
complex  behavior  of  the  social  type,  for  he  develops  a  theory 
to  account  for  the  fact  that  instincts,^.while  substantial  ele- 
ments, can  still  be  the  basis  for  all  complex  human  action. 
This  theory  assumes  that  an  instinct  can  be  divided  into 
'three  corresponding  parts,  whose  activities  are  the  cognitive, 
the  affective  and  the  conative  features  respectively  of  the 
total  instinctive  process.'4  Now  the  emotional  factor  is 
assumed  to  be  unmodified  throughout  all  the  various  changes 
which  involve  the  other  two  factors;5  so  that  not  only  can 
you  find  the  same  dispositions  in  animals  as  in  man,  but  in 
man  they  can  develop  to  any  possible  degree.  Unfortunately 
for  McDougall  this  theory  glaringly  exposes  his  indefensible 
position.  For  note,  he  allows  for  so  much  development  in 

*'Soc.  Psychol.,' p.  26  ff. 

1  Brit.  J.  of  Psyckol.,  3,  253.  It  seems  clear  that  McDougall  does  not  hold 
that  the  enduring  condition  of  an  instinctive  act  is  a  definite  potential  reaction  system, 
that  is  to  say,  a  concrete  response  pattern  which  will  function  when  stimulated. 

•  Brit.  J.  of  Psychol.,  3,  253. 
«'Soc.  Psychol.,' p.  32. 

•  Ibid.,  p.  34. 


64  /.  R.  KANTOR 

the  dispositions  that  he  almost  gives  up  the  idea  that  the 
springs  of  human  actions  are  innate.  In  extricating  himself 
from  this  difficulty  McDougall  further  weakens  his  position, 
since  in  making  the  emotional  aspect  of  the  instinct  the  sole 
innate  spring  of  action  he  runs  counter  to  the  fact  which  he 
himself  admits,1  namely,  his  inability  to  point  out  definite 
actual  emotions  in  any  but  the  'principal'  powerful  instincts. 
The  precariousness  of  McDougall's  position  is  not  at  all 
mitigated  by  his  highly  questionable  identification  of  the 
affective  component  of  an  instinct  with  an  emotion.2 

The  conclusion  that  we  may  draw  from  the  imperfection 
of  McDougall's  view  is  that  he  does  not  fully  realize  that  he 
is  attempting  to  interpret  instinctive  conduct,  which  is  an 
entirely  different  matter  from  demonstrating  the  function  of 
instincts  in  all  the  complex  actions  of  human  beings.  He 
therefore  starts  from  the  wrong  premises  and  is  easily  led  to 
the  bizarre  idea  of  the  substantial  mental  character  of  in- 
stincts. It  is  an  egregious  error  for  McDougall3  to  think 
that  he  is  alone  in  believing  that  instincts  are  at  the  founda- 
tion of  our  mental  life.  It  is  almost  a  universal  conviction 
among  psychologists  that  all  human  behavior  is  based  upon 
instincts  as  a  foundation,  but  the  important  point  is,  that  this 
foundation  as  an  actual  phenomenon  is  only  a  transitory 
phase  of  a  maturation  process.4  For  instance,  when  we 
observe  the  fighting  reactions  in  the  child  and  in  the  adult 
we  are  severely  impressed  with  the  qualitative  difference  of 
the  respective  reactions.  In  the  first  place,  the  specific 
responses  in  each  case  are  different,  implying  that  no  enduring 
nervous  basis  can  be  inherited  for  the  purpose.5  Again,  the 
stimulating  situations  may  be  absolutely  different  not  only 
in  the  developing  individual  at  different  stages,  but  also  in. 
the  same  stage  of  growth  at  different  moments,  and  in  dif- 
ferent individuals  at  the  same  moment.  Not  only  will  a  fear 
situation  in  any  of  these  cases  call  out  different  sorts  of 

1  Ibid.,  p.  46. 

8  Cf.  Drever,  op.  cit.,  p.  156  ff. 

3  Brit.  J.  of  PsychoL,  3,  260. 

4  In  the  same  sense  as  the  foetal  structure  which  is  the  foundation  for  the  adult 
physique  is  integrated  in  the  course  of  development. 

*  Cf.  'Soc.  Psycho!.,'  p.  29. 


HUMAN  INSTINCTS  65 

responses  in  the  individual,  but  it  may  call  out  the  same  sort 
as  an  anger  situation.  In  all  cases  the  response  of  the  indi- 
vidual will  depend  in  part  upon  the  multiplicity  of  circum- 
stances immediately  surrounding  him.  The  fighting  reac- 
tions, for  example,  will  depend  upon  the  presence  or  absence 
of  onlookers  and  the  regard  one  has  for  them  if  they  are 
present,  as  well  as  upon  the  thing  at  stake  in  the  contest. 
Such  reaction  will  also  be  conditioned  by  all  sorts  of  technical 
information  and  convictions  one  has  acquired  relative  to 
fighting  in  general  or  to  fighting  under  these  specific  circum- 
stances. When  we  observe  a  complex  social  action  we  are 
convinced  that  even  such  elaborate  and  significant  sugges- 
tions1 which  the  penetrating  students  of  human  conduct 
enumerate,  cannot  fully  cover  its  conditioning  influences, 
although  of  course  for  some  definite  purposes  not  all  of  these 
influences  are  relevant. 

McDougall's  discussion  involves  the  gratuitous  assump- 
tion that  the  substantial  instinct  entity  can  be  aroused  under 
very  different  kinds  of  circumstances.  For  instance,  at 
one  time  the  instinct  can  be  aroused  by  a  natural  stimulus  and 
at  another  by  a  complex  social  situation,  all  through  the 
medium  of  an  emotion  entity.  There  is  apparently  more 
than  a  smack2  of  the  old  faculty  psychology  in  McDougall's 
thinking,  a  fact  which  is  genuinely  surprising  when  we  con- 
sider that  at  certain  points  he  almost  realizes  the  distinction 
between  instincts  and  instinctive  behavior,  as  for  example, 
in  differentiating  between  the  specific  and  general  tendencies.* 

McDougall's  insistence  upon  the  generality  of  instincts 
is  based  therefore  upon  the  dubious  premise  that  there  are  a 
few  innate  springs  of  all  human  conduct,  rather  than  upon 
the  observation  that  human  behavior  is  a  complex  inter- 
action of  an  experienced  and  intelligent  person  with  a  multi- 
plex environmental  situation.  It  is  the  very  complexity 
of  the  total  situation  that  seems  favorable  to  the  arbitrary 
analysis  of  it  into  a  few  constant  factors.  This  is  familiarly 
illustrated  in  the  case  of  the  complicated  social  and  institu- 

1  Such  as  are  found  in  Veblen,  'The  Leisure  Class,'  etc. 
1  Cf.  Drever,  op.  cit.,  p.  16. 
» '  Soc.  Psychol.,'  p.  20. 


66  /.  R.  KANTOR 

tional  circumstances  which  are  reduced  to  a  few  simple 
activities  of  the  '  economic  man.'  McDougall1  has  gone  only 
a  step  farther  than  Cousin,  whom  he  severely  criticizes,  in 
the  interpretation  of  the  conditions  of  human  activity, 
because  the  former  fails  to  see  that  the  dispositions  to  human 
action  are  all  complex  acquired  functions  and  not  a  com- 
pound system  of  original  sensori-motor  arcs,2  plus  some  type 
of  antecedently  functioning  mental  activity.3  The  explana- 
tion of  McDougall's  doctrine  of  generalized  instincts  seems 
to  be  the  fact  that  he  stands  for  a  theory  of  psychological 
predestination,4  and  so  he  makes  of  the  human  individual  a 
machine  fitted  with  definite  powers  which  require  only  an 
indifferent  stimulus  to  make  them  perform  whatever  seems 
necessary  to  be  done.5  Although  he  condemns  the  practice 
in  others,  McDougall  ascribes  to  the  functioning  of  an  instinct 
any  frequent  or  constant  form  of  action.  Thus,  the  acqui- 
sition and  building  up  of  large  estates  are  attributed  to  the 
acquisitive  instinct.6  It  is  a  queer  doctrine  of  magical 
potencies  which  can  describe  the  development  of  such  elabor- 
ate institutions7  as  we  have  in  our  complex  life  to  the  func- 
tioning of  a  dozen  or  so  of  instincts.  And  more  anomalous 
still  is  the  presentation  of  such  a  doctrine  in  face  of  the 
overwhelming  facts  pointing  to  the  shaping  of  our  instinctive 
behavior,  by  the  lives  and  acts  of  persons  and  institutions.8 

The  entire  controversy  concerning  the  specificity  of  in- 
stincts is  made  possible  only  by  an  inclination  toward  a 
structural  psychological  position.  When  we  take  concrete 

1  Ibid.,  p.  12  ff. 

1  'Soc.  Psychol.,'  p.  29. 

8  Conative  tendency — cf.  Brit.  J.  of  Psychol.,  p.  261  ff.  "The  instinctive  impulses 
determine  the  ends  of  all  activities  and  supply  the  driving  power  by  which  all  mental 
activities  are  sustained."  'Soc.  Psychol.,'  p.  44. 

*  "I  hold  to  the  reality  of  teleological  determination  of  human  and  animal  be- 
havior." 'Soc.  Psychol.,'  Preface,  second  edition. 

6  The  writer  wonders  whether  McDougall  considers  the  instincts  as  such  absolute 
springs  of  action  that  they  function  either  as  determining  the  ends  of  all  actions  or 
merely  by  being  suppressed.  Cf.  McDougall's  discussion  of  the  parental  instincts, 
'Soc.  Psychol.,'  p.  267  ff. 

6  Cf.  'Soc.  Psychol.,'  p.  323. 

7  "These  impulses  are  the  mental  forces  that  maintain  and  shape  all  the  life  of 
individuals  and  societies."     'Soc.  Psychol.,"  p.  44. 

8  Cf.  Woodworth,  'Dynamic  Psychol.,'  p.  72  ff. 


HUMAN  INSTINCTS  f 

human  behavior  to  be  the  province  of  psychology  we  are 
very  soon  impressed  with  the  fact  that  instincts  are  neces- 
sarily specific  in  their  functioning,  but  that  the  adult  indi- 
vidual has  no  instincts.  Furthermore,  the  obvious  generality 
and  unpredictability  of  adult  behavior  should  lead  us  to  ob- 
serve that  instinctive  conduct  is  general  because  the  environ- 
ing conditions  to  which  it  is  responsive  are  incessantly 
variable  in  their  stimulating  capacities. 

IV 

Relation  of  Instincts  and  Emotion. — The  study  of  instinc- 
tive conduct  has  in  recent  years  resulted  in  the  almost  uni- 
versal agreement  of  psychologists  that  a  very  close  relation 
exists  between  such  behavior  and  emotions,  although  there 
are  several  doctrines  as  to  the  precise  details  of  this  relation- 
ship. It  is  held,  on  the  one  hand,  that  emotions  are  of  instinc- 
tive origin  and  occur  when  the  instincts  are  checked  or  in| 
conflict,  while  on  the  other,  it  is  believed  that  emotions  are 
the  correlates  of  instincts  in  some  form.  It  must  be  granted 
that  both  these  views  are  based  upon  observable  conduct, 
and  especially  the  fact  that  in  many  cases  of  instinctive 
behavior  a  powerful  feeling  element  is  involved;  the  impor- 
tance of  the  data,  however,  intensified  by  the  lack  of  uniform- 
ity in  interpretation,  demands  a  more  adequate  analysis. 

The  view  that  emotions  are  correlates  of  instincts  is  ably 
championed  by  McDougall,  who,  as  we  have  seen,  believes 
that  the  primary  emotion  is  the  affective  element  of  the 
instinct.  The  primary  objection  to  such  an  interpretation, 
as  we  have  also  seen,  is  that  many  instinctive  actions  do  not 
involve  emotions,1  and  that  many  emotional  situations  da 
not  have  such  instinctive  associates  as  are  so  convincingly 
discussed  in  the  cases  of  anger  and  fear.  As  we  have  re- 
marked above,  the  insistence  upon  the  invariable  presence  of 
an  emotion  in  every  instinctive  act  is  to  reduce  emotions  in 
many  cases  to  simple  affective  states.2  It  is  significant  that 
Drever,  who  closely  follows  McDougall,  is  forced  to  the 

1  Cf.  Shand,  'The  Foundation  of  Character,'  p..  6,  370. 
*  Cf.  Drever,  op.  cit.,  p.  155  ff. 


68  /.  R.  KANTOR 

conclusion  that  only  some  instincts  have  emotional  accom- 
paniments. 

The  conflict  theory,  insofar  as  it  insists  upon  a  conflict 
situation  as  the  basis  of  an  emotional  behavior,  meets  with 
few  if  any  exceptions  in  fact,  but  the  question  arises  whether 
the  conflict  is  in  all  cases  a  conflict  of  instincts.  The  critical 
analysis  of  the  emotional  situation  indicates  that  this  is 
not  true.  Before  proceeding  to  such  an  analysis  of  emotional 
behavior  it  is  well  to  describe  its  chief  characteristics. 

An  emotion  is  an  interrupting  form  of  response  to  a 
suddenly  presented  stimulus  in  which  various  organic  pro- 
cesses are  put  into  function,  which  in  turn  facilitate  the  imme- 
diate performance  of  a  new  act.  Among  the  outstanding 
features  of  an  emotional  action  are  the  confusion  and  excite- 
ment which  pave  the  way  for  a  new  act  by  inhibiting  the 
behavior  which  is  taking  place  when  the  emotion-exciting 
stimulus  is  presented.  Naturally  such  an  act  is  replete  with 
affective  and  organic  resonance,  and  here  we  find  the  clue  to  the 
relationship  between  the  emotional  and  the  instinctive  types 
of  behavior. 

What  happens  in  the  case  of  the  emotional  situation  is 
that  a  dissociation  of  the  reaction  systems  of  the  person 
takes  place;  so  that  in  the  most  violent  type  of  emotion  the 
person  is  left  only  with  the  capacity  to  act  with  almost  purely 
physiological  (reflex)  behavior.  From  this  extreme  case  we 
find  a  gradation  of  emotional  conduct  in  which  the  disor- 
ganization leaves  free  to  function  a  series  of  reaction  patterns 
ranging  from  the  simplest  to  the  most  complex  instinctive 
behavior.  The  fear  and  anger  situations  offer  excellent 
examples  of  the  disturbances  of  behavior  which  leave  com- 
paratively simple  forms  of  instinctive  response  to  adapt  the 
individual.  ..A  person  may  be  walking  along  through  a 
wood,  perhaps  thinking  over  some  problem,  when  suddenly 
there  is  a  cessation  of  the  thought  activity  and  the  person 
finds  himself  in  a  state  of  great  excitement  and  unpleasant- 
ness, and  in  readiness  to  run  from  a  tiny  creature  madly 
scurrying  through  the  brush.  In  this  illustration,  the  simple 
instinctive,  danger-avoiding  response  might  appear,  as  the 


HUMAN  INSTINCTS  69 

most  serviceable  form  of  behavior  under  the  circumstances. 
We  see,  therefore,  that  not  because  an  emotion  is  a  component 
of  an  instinct  or  a  conflict  between  instincts  is  it  closely  related 
to  instinctive  behavior,  but  because  under  certain  conditions 
of  stimulation  the  reaction  systems  are  so  disorganized  as  to 
leave  only  some  instinctive  mode  of  behavior  to  function. 

Upon  the  basis  of  such  an  interpretation  we  can  under- 
stand the  more  refined  emotional  responses,  namely,  those  in 
which  no  violent  instinctive  reaction  is  involved.  In  the 
functioning  of  the  more  subtle  emotions1  the  environmental 
circumstances  are  such  as  to  disturb  only  the  most  elaborate 
and  definitely  focused  acquired  reaction  systems,  for  example, 
rational  conduct,  and  thus  leaves  free  to  function  such 
complex  forms  of  behavior  as  almost  entirely  to  dispel  the 
appearance  of  a  shock  or  conflict.  The  resumed  activities  in 
such  cases  are  of  course  only  slightly  different  from  those 
interrupted. 

V 

In  conclusion  we  might  point  out  three  cognate  obstructive 
tendencies,  which  persistently  hinder  psychological  thinking 
concerning  instincts,  and  which  prevent  the  scientific  interpre- 
tation of  instinctive  behavior,  namely  (i)  metapsychological 
speculation,  (2)  biological  abstractionism,  and  (3)  psycho- 
logical simplification. 

Metapsychological  Speculation. — This  motive  has  always 
been  a  prominent  factor  in  discussions  of  instincts,  and 
strangely  enough  is  still  responsible  for  the  many  inaccuracies 
and  trivialities  of  those  studies.  The  unmistakable  theologi- 
cal implication  of  this  attitude  is  manifested  by  the  explana- 
tion of  instinctive  behavior  in  terms  of  a  mysterious  original 
force  implanted  in  animals  to  carry  out  some  primary  end 
of  life,  as  for  example,  the  preservation  of  the  species.2  We 
have  already  had  occasion  to  refer  to  the  hardly  less  objec- 
tionable aspect  of  the  metapsychological  view,  which  makes 

1  Not  the  diffused  feelings. 

1  Represented  in  psychology  today  by  McDougall  and  Drever,  who  stand  in  the 
von  Hartmann-Bergson  line  of  development,  cf.  Drever,  op.  cit.,  p.  89. 


70  ].  R.  KANTOR 

instinctive  behavior  stand  for  everything  that  is  considered 
unknown  or  persistent  in  conscious  behavior.1 

Much  the  worst  disservice  of  the  metapsychological 
attitude  is  precisely  that  it  maintains  unknowables  which 
prevent  the  adequate  investigation  of  psychological  pheno- 
mena. To  assume  that  instincts  are  ultimates  of  animal 
nature  and  to  seek  to  describe  these  putative  elements, 
precludes  the  conception  of  instincts  as  definite  forms  of 
concrete  responses. 

Biological  Abstractionism. — We  may  consider  the  histor- 
ical rise  of  biological  abstractionism  as  a  protest  against  the 
extreme  vagaries  of  the  speculative  psychologists.  The 
biological  influences  in  psychology  transformed  instincts  into 
simple  psychological  phenomena  explicable  in  terms  of  the 
nervous  structure  of  the  organism.  Thus  we  find  the  state- 
ment that  the  instinctive  factors  in  behavior  'depend  entirely 
on  how  the  nervous  system  has  been  built  up  through  heredity 
under  the  mode  of  racial  preparation  which  we  call  evolution.'2 
Instincts  are  consequently  considered  to  be  specific  arrange- 
ments of  neural  mechanisms;  so  that  James,  following  Spencer, 
spoke  of  them  as  conforming  to  the  general  reflex  type. 

An  unacceptable  issue  of  physiological  abstructionism 
is  the  tendency  to  overlook  actual  phenomena  to  such  a 
degree  as  to  allow  for  no  difference  between  such  widely 
varying  behavior  as  we  find  in  man  and  animals.  Our  study 
of  instinctive  conduct  has  afforded  sufficient  intimation  that 
much  of  the  unsatisfactory  interpretation  of  such  behavior 
can  be  traced  directly  to  the  fact  that  it  is  the  animal  type  of 
reaction  that  is  'uncritically  employed  as  an  exclusive  basis 
of  description.  As  a  consequence  this  comparatively  simple 
behavior  is  resolved  into  hypothetical  neural  elements  which 
can  in  no  way  account  for  so  conspicuous  a  variation  as  the 
rapid  development  of  human  instincts  into  intelligent 
conduct,  and  the  practically  stationary  condition  of  the 

1  So  that  the  success  of  a  politician  or  business  man  is  attributed  to  the  presence  of 
political  or  business  instincts,  the  desire  of  a  nation  to  govern  itself  to  the  functioning 
of  a  self-governing  instinct,  and  the  building  of  cities  to  the  presence  of  a  gregarious 
instinct. 

2  Morgan,  Brit.  ].  of  Psychol.,  3.,  p.  220. 


HUMAN  INSTINCTS  7' 

animal  instincts.  It  is  small  wonder,  then,  that  the  upholders 
of  the  physiological  view  fail  to  observe  that  the  human 
individual  merely  passes  through  the  stage  of  animal  conduct 
just  as  he  passes  through  the  stage  of  simpler  structural 
developments,  and  that  the  mature  person  is  equipped  with 
an  entirely  different  series  of  reaction  patterns  than  the  animal 
or  child.  And  so  we  find  that,  contrary  to  our  expectation, 
the  fact  that  the  complete  absence  of  instincts  in  the  human 
individual  forces  us  to  resort  to  animal  behavior  in  order  to 
study  them,  does  not  influence  the  biological  abstractionist 
to  reflect  upon  the  differences  in  the  two  kinds  of  behavior, 
but  instead  he  is  led  to  interpret  human  conduct  in  the 
same  abstract  terms  as  the  simpler  kinds  of  behavior. 
Incidentally,  the  failure  to  distinguish  between  the  instinc- 
tive conduct  of  man  and  the  instincts  of  animals  results  in 
the  ascription  of  a  degree  of  intelligence  to  animal  conduct 
which  is  really  not  found  there. 

Probably  the  most  serious  defect  of  biological  abstrac- 
tionism is  that  it  obscures  the  extremely  dynamic  character 
of  human  behavior.  The  principle  of  rigid  neural  functions 
is  entirely  inapplicable  to  the  spontaneous  and  developmental 
aspects  of  our  conduct,  and  favors  the  neglect  of  the  stimu- 
lating circumstances  which  greatly  modify  it. 

Psychological  Simplification. — The  unfortunate  phase  of 
the  protest  against  biological  abstractionism  is  the  psycho- 
logical simplification  of  human  behavior,  which  reduces 
instinctive  conduct  to  the  functioning  of  psychical  dispositions 
or  impulses.  As  represented  by  McDougall  and  his  followers, 
this  view  stands  as  a  justifiable  criticism  of  physiological 
abstractionism,  but  in  its  espousal  of  the  subjective  position 
as  over  against  the  objective,  that  is  to  say,  the  position  of 
action  and  behavior,1  it  is  hindered  from  interpreting  instinc- 
tive conduct  as  it  actually  functions.  Psychologists  who 
are  influenced  by  this  viewpoint  are  unable  to  depart  from  a 
structural  or  content  description  of  human  behavior;  they 
are  prevented  from  conceiving  of  the  complex  non-rational 
conduct  of  man  as  the  product  of  an  intricate  give  and  take 

1  C/.  Drever,  op.  cit.,  p.  16. 


72  /.  R.  KAN  TOR 

process  between  persons  and  the  social  institutions  which 
constitute  their  milieu.  When  such  complex  behavior  is 
interpreted  as  an  empirical  consequent  of  numerous  human 
conditions,  we  can  readily  see  that  religious  conduct1  cannot 
be  'a  very  complex  and  diversified  product  of  the  cooperation 
of  several  instincts,'  that  is  to  say,  a  'compound'  of  simpler 
emotions.  To  describe  religious  behavior  as  the  manifes- 
tation of  a  complication  of  simple  mental  elements  is  to  forego 
the  scientific  advantage  of  observing  the  ramified  inter- 
action of  persons  with  their  surrounding  political,  economic 
and  cultural  institutions.  The  unwarranted  simplification 
of  human  behavior  means  that  instead  of  analyzing  the 
social  process  in  which  are  developed  the  deep-seated  action 
patterns,  the  latter  are  gratuitously  assumed  as  permanent 
elements  of  human  character.  The  situation  is  not  at  all 
improved  by  asserting  that  complex  'impulses'  are  developed 
from  simple  'impulses.'2  To  deny  that  instinctive  conduct 
is  socially  formed  reaction  systems  is  to  revert  to  the  simplicity 
of  the  rustic  who  protests  against  the  daylight-saving  law  as 
an  interference  with  God's  time. 

A  functional  viewpoint  of  behavior,  we  submit,  avoids 
completely  the  three  insidious  tendencies  which  we  have  just 
examined.  Since  the  functional  psychologist  assumes  the 
data  of  psychology  to  be  concrete  adaptational  responses  to 
surrounding  things,  he  can  whole  heartedly  reject  all  putative 
powers  and  elements,  and  confine  his  labors  to  the  analysis 
of  verifiable  materials,  such  as  human  reaction  systems  are. 
Abiding  by  such  a  policy,  a  psychologist  is  ipso  facto  barred 
from  an  impatient  out  of  hand  solution  of  difficult  problems. 
Especially  in  the  matter  of  instinctive  conduct,  a  functional 
viewpoint  may  lead  to  a  scientific  and  significant,  if  tentative 
interpretation  of  an  important  series  of  psychological  adap- 
tations. 

1  Or  religious  emotion,  cf.  McDougall,  'Soc.  Psychol.,'  pp.  81-82,  89. 

2  "If  we  accept  the  doctrine  of  the  evolution  of  man  from  animal  forms,  we  are 
compelled  to  seek  the  origin  of  religious  emotions  and  impulses  in  instincts  that  are 
not  specifically  religious." — McDougall,  'Soc.  Psychol.,'  p.  89. 


IMMOBILITY:  AN  INQUIRY  INTO  THE  MECHAN- 
ISM OF  THE   FEAR   REACTION 

BY  J.  P.  M'GONIGAL 

Judging  by  the  uncritical  spirit  in  which  psychologists  have 
received  recent  physiological  conceptions,  it  would  seem 
that  the  long  discussion  of  emotion  precipitated  by  the 
James-Lange  theory  had  exhausted  the  interest  of  the  psychol- 
ogists about  the  time  that  it  secured  the  attention  of  the 
physiologists.  The  current  conception  of  fear  is  a  case  in 
point.  To  Darwin,  Ribot,  Mantegazza,  Mosso,  Lange  and 
others  fear,  with  its  dual  impulses  of  flight  and  immobility, 
was  the  most  baffling  of  the  major  emotions.  Today  one 
finds  it  generally  spoken  of  as  a  complex  of  the  impulses  of 
flight  and  attack,  the  once  perplexing  impulse  of  immobility 
receiving  scant,  if  any,  attention.  This  shift  in  opinion  is 
traceable  to  the  demonstrations  of  the  physiologists  that 
under  the  influence  of  either  fear  or  rage  the  organism  under- 
goes profound  physiological  modifications  which  prepare  the 
body  for  sustained  motor  activity. 

Now,  it  is  not  the  business  of  physiologists  to  analyze 
subjective  states  and  psychologists  have  no  right  to  quarrel 
with  such  expressions  as  "the  animal  was  either  frightened  or 
enraged."  If  they  were  not  prepared  for  such  inexactness  in 
matters  of  importance  to  them,  the^very  tone  of  the  physiologi- 
cal literature  should  have  warned  them.  The  physiologists 
have  been,  very  properly,  absorbed  in  tracing  the  interrela- 
tions of  certain  obscure  mechanisms  which  produce,  among 
man/  other  intricate  effects,  emotional  reactions,  the  particu- 
lar kind  of  emotion  being  of  secondary  interest.  Not  so 
the  psychologist.  To  him,  fear  neither  looks  nor  feels  like 
rage.  Fear  is  a  more  primitive  reaction,  it  appears  earlier 
in  the  life  of  the  human  infant,  it  is  more  uniform  and  definite 
in  its  manifestations,  less  adaptive  and  more  widely  dis- 
tributed throughout  the  animal  kingdom.  Such  being  the 

73 


74  /•  P-  M'GONIGAL 

case,  it  would  be  strange,  indeed,  if  the  mechanism  of  fear 
were  not  sharply  differentiated  from  that  of  anger.  In  the 
present  paper  the  attempt  is  made  to  define  the  physiological 
basis  of  fear,  to  show  that  it  is  distinct  from  that  of  anger  and 
to  vindicate  the  earlier  psychologists  in  their  belief  that  the 
fundamental  impulse  in  the  emotion  is  that  of  immobility. 

For  the  purposes  of  comparative  study  we  shall  define  fear 
as  the  typical  reaction  to  situations  of  imminent  or  potential 
danger.  Tracing  this  danger  reaction  downward  from  man 
to  the  lower  orders,  it  will  be  found  that  the  impulse  to  hide, 
crouch  down,  stand  still,  etc.,  becomes  more  and  more  pro- 
nounced until,  in  some  insects,  we  reach  the  trance-like 
state  of  the  death  feint.  The  term  'death  feint'  is  not  only 
inaccurate  but  is  used  with  misleading  looseness  to  cover 
both  the  tetany  of  the  lower  orders  and  the  remarkable  state 
of  relaxation  seen  in  birds  and  animals.  The  reaction  is, 
of  course,  not  a  feint  at  all.  There  is  seldom  an/  resemblance 
between  the  postures  of.  a  feigning  animal  and  one  really 
dead,  while  the  implication  of  a  purpose  to  deceive  is  obviously 
absurd.  The  reaction  is,  in  fact,  one  of  the  least  adaptive 
and  most  difficult  to  account  for  teleologically  in  the  whole 
range  of  behavior.  In  the  first  place,  the  strength  and  dura- 
tion of  the  response  bears  no  relation  to  the  stimulus.  In 
some  insects  the  slightest  stimulus  will  cause  a  profound 
feint  which  cannot,  thereafter,  be  produced  by  stimuli  of 
any  strength.  In  other  species  the  insect  can  be  made  to 
feign  as  many  as  fifty  times  in  succession,  the  duration  of  the 
feints  increasing  for  the  first  few  times  and  then  rapidly 
decreasing,  the  stimuli  being  uniform  throughout  the  ex- 
periment. The  distribution  of  the  reaction  among  the  species 
is  as  erratic  as  its  character.  In  closely  allied  forms,  one  will 
possess  the  reaction  and  others  will  not.  This  last  observa- 
tion applies  also  to  the  relaxed  form  of  the  feint  found  in 
birds  and  the  higher  animals.  Some  species  of  all  orders 
possess  the  characteristic,  but  it  must,  on  the  whole,  be 
considered  an  exceptional  manifestation.  The  very  fact  of 
this  wide  and  erratic  distribution  would  seem  to  indicate  the 
existance  of  some  mechanism  common  to  all  animals,  which 


IMMOBILITY  75 

under  certain  conditions  assumes  the  form  of  the  death 
feint,  but  which  in  most  cases,  we  must  suppose,  functions  in 
some  less  conspicuous  way. 

The  possibility  of  such  a  hidden  existence  of  the  mechan- 
ism is  shown  by  an  experiment  of  Holmes.  In  the  lower 
orders,  contact  stimuli  very  generally  cause  reversal  of 
tropisms.  Holmes  found  this  to  be  true  of  Ranatra  when  in 
the  water.  On  land,  however,  the  same  stimulus  produced 
the  death  feint,  upon  revival  from  which  the  insect  showed 
the  usual  reversal.1  In  its  customary  environment  there 
would  have  been  no  reason  to  suppose  that  Ranatra  possessed 
the  ability  to  feign.  That  a  similar  mechanism  may,  in  this 
way,  lie  hidden  behind  the  simple  hesitancy  of  the  startled 
individual  of  the  higher  orders  is  at  least  suggested  by  the 
gradation  of  the  response  in  birds.  Chicks,  ducklings  and 
plovers  will,  upon  being  startled,  crouch  down,  pheasants  stop 
dead  and  hold  rigidly  the  posture  in  which  they  happened  to 
be  at  the  moment  of  fright;  terns,  peewits,  land-  and  water- 
rail  are  'feigners'  that  lie  limp  and  allow  themselves  to  be 
handled  without  showing  signs  of  life.  We  shall  assume, 
then,  for  the  time  being,  that  an  unitary  principle  runs  through 
all  the  various  forms  of  danger  response  and  proceed  to  take 
advantage  of  the  opportunity  afforded  by  its  extreme  ex- 
pression in  the  death  feint  to  study  its  mechanism. 

As  it  appears  in  the  lower  orders,  the  death  feint  is  not  a 
state  of  mere  quiescence.  The  muscular  tension  is  often 
tremendous.  A  feigning  Ranatra  may  be  held  horizontally 
by  one  of  its  slender  legs,  the  whole  weight  of  its  body  being 
sustained  by  the  tiny  muscles.  Here,  clearly,  is  a  sharp 
redirection  of  nervous  energy,  which,  since  the  posture  may 
be  retained  for  long  periods,  must  depend  upon  some  pro- 
found modification  of  the  physiological  state.  Evidence  of 
the  same  nature  is  given  by  Holmes,  Towle,  Yerkes,  Parker 
and  the  Severins  who  have  observed  that  upon  revival  the 
feigning  insects  show  reversal  of  tropisms,  indicating  a  change 
in  sensitivity  difficult  to  account  for  if  the  primary  reaction 
is  a  mere  reflex.  Pointing  in  the  same  physiological  direc- 

1  Holmes:  'Studies  in  Animal  Behavior,'  p.  104. 


76  /.  P.   M'GONIGAL 

tion  are  the  results  of  the  Severins  on  the  duration  of  successive 
feints  in  Belostoma.  In  a  group  of  ten  insects  the  average 
duration  of  the  first  thirteen  feints  were  as  follows:  (time  in 
minutes)  15.0,  32.4,  37.2,  24.0,  16.0,  15.9,  19.5,  12.8,  15.0, 
9.1,  9.1,  5.4,  5.5.  Specimen  A  of  this  group  was  made  to 
feign  fifty  times  for  a  total  of  382  minutes,  of  which  256  were 
accounted  for  by  the  first  ten  feints.  This  distribution  of 
time  is  typical.1  Graphs  of  the  feints  of  specially  good 
feigners  (made  by  the  present  writer)  all  show  sharp  peaks 
at  the  beginning  and  then  a  slow  decline  with  a  rhythmic 
tendency,  the  whole  picture  suggesting  a  reaction  conditioned 
by  some  autocoid  of  which  the  supply  is  limited  as  in  the  case 
of  adrenin.  A  similar  suggestion  is  supplied  by  the  reaction 
in  birds.  Lloyd  Morgan  mentions  a  water-rail  that  changed 
in  an  instant  from  a  state  of  complete  inanimation  to  the 
most  violent  and  frenzied  rushing  about,  while  Holmes  makes 
the  same  observation  in  regard  to  terns.  Holmes  could 
never  get  the  birds  to  feign  a  second  time.  Remembering 
that  the  passage  from  the  feint  to  the  frantic  struggles  and 
blind  flight  occurs  spontaneously  and  without  any  transi- 
tional stage,  it  would  appear  that  the  second  state  resulted 
from  the  exhaustion  of  some  form  of  energy  which  served 
to  maintain  the  first. 

These  various  conjectures  (of  which  we  have  no  definite 
confirmation)  that  the  death  feint  is  the  result  of  an  unusual 
functioning  of  a  mechanism  common  to  all  animals,  and  that 
it  is  due  to  the  redirection  of  energy  caused  by  some  specific 
agent  of  the  nature  of  an  autocoid,  are  given  support  by  the 
fact  that  under  certain  abnormal  conditions  a  reaction 
strikingly  similar,  even  in  details,  can  be  observed  in  the 
higher  animals  and  man.  This  is  the  tetanic  state  produced 
by  strychnine  poison  and  tetanus  toxin.  Under  the  in- 
fluence of  these  poisons  the  body  becomes  tense  and  rigid, 
the  paroxisms,  which  are  most  easily  induced  by  some  form 
of  contact,  lasting,  in  man,  usually  about  fifteen  seconds. 
Two  theories  are  advanced  to  explain  the  action  of  the  poisons. 

1  Severin,  Henry  H.  P.,  and  Severin,  Harry  C:  'An  Experimental  Study  of  the 
Death-Feigning  of  Belostoma  (-Zaitha  Aucct.)  flumineum  Say  and  Nepa  apiculata 
Uhler,'  Behavior  Monographs,  No.  3,  p.  1 1. 


IMMOBILITY  77 

The  first  states  that  the  toxin  increases  the  conductivity  of 
the  nerves  to  such  an  extent  that  coordinated  activity  be- 
comes impossible,  the  chaos  of  currents  resulting  in  tetanic 
rigidity  of  the  muscles.  The  second  theory,  that  of  Sherring- 
ton,  maintains  that  the  reciprocal  inhibitions  normally  main- 
tained by  the  central  nervous  mechanisms  are  changed  by 
the  poisons  to  excitations.  By  using  carefully  graded  doses  of 
strychnine  Sherrington  was  able  to  produce  a  state  in  which 
reflex  relaxation  was  diminished  and  not  replaced  by  ex- 
citation. "This  phenomenon,"  he  says,  "shows  well  how 
little  competent  is  the  view  of  lowered  spinal  resistance  to 
really  explain  the  action  of  strychnine,  for  at  this  stage  the 
stimulated  arc  that  normally  acts  on  the  extensor  muscle  by 
inhibition  is  less  able  to  affect  it  than  before,  so  that  on  the 
spinal  resistance  view  the  resistance  at  this  stage  is  actually 
heightened."1  Sherrington's  theory,  in  other  words,  attri- 
butes this  pathological  'immobility'  in  the  higher  forms  to 
a  redirection  of  nervous  energy  analogous  to  that  which  the 
general  nature  of  the  reaction  and  the  fact  that  it  is  accom- 
panied by  the  reversal  of  tropisms,  led  us  to  assume  in  re- 
gard to  the  lower  orders.  Now,  while  the  use  of  inducted 
poisons  is  a  legitimate  method  of  uncovering  the  mechanism 
of  immobility,  we  have,  fortunately,  a  more  direct  avenue  of 
approach  through  the  disorder  of  tetany,  a  disturbance 
similar  to  tetanus  but  milder  in  form.  Tetany  is  exhibited 
in  many  diseases  and  is  now  generally  believed  to  be  of 
parathyroid  origin.  This  view  is  based  upon  the  undis- 
puted fact  that  deprivation  of  the  parathyroids  produces 
tetany  and  that  administration  of  parathyroid  extract  re- 
lieves the  disorder.  Schafer,  who  represents  the  later  work 
on  the  endocrine  organs,  believes  that  this  may  be  explained 
by  the  cholonic  or  restraining  action  of  the  parathyroid 
secretion  which  offsets  in  the  normal  animal  the  action  of 
an  autocoid  of  opposite  tendency  produced  by  the  thyroid 
(thyrine).2  Here  we  have  an  autocoid  which,  by  redirecting 
the  normal  flow  of  nervous  energy,  produces  a  state  of  rigidity 

1  Sherrington:  'Integrative  Action  of  the  Nervous  System,'  p.  108;  vide  p.  106-13, 
292-7. 

1  Schafer:  'The  Endocrine  Organs,'  pp.  23  and  40. 


7§  /.   P.  M'GONIGAL 

and  muscular  tension  that  precisely  duplicates  the  conditions 
(known  and  surmised)  of  the  typical  death  feint  of  the  lower 
orders. 

In  the  healthy  organism,  of  course,  the  existence  of  this 
mechanism  of  immobility  is  concealed  by  the  action  of  the 
parathyroids.  Is  it  merely  concealed?  It  might  be  sug- 
gested that  the  action  we  have  just  described  is  totally  abol- 
ished in  the  normal  individual  and  plays  no  part  in  the  danger 
response  of  the  higher  orders.  Yet,  undoubtedly,  animals 
and  men  are  occasionally  'paralyzed  with  fear'  and  a  com- 
parison of  the  readily  recognizable  'expressions'  of  fear  and 
the  known  effects  of  thyrine  will  show  that  in  the  less  violent 

EXPRESSIONS  OF  FEAR1 
(Expressions  due  to  the  skeletal  musculature  are  omitted) 

Quickened  heart  beat Thyrine 

Arrested  respiration Thyrine 

Pallor Adrenin 

Perspiration Thyrine 

Immobility Thyrine 

Tremors Thyrine 

Dry  mouth Thyrine 

Arrest  of  menstruation Thyrine2 

Arrest  of  lactation Thyrine2 

Protruding  eyeballs Thyrine3 

Dilated  pupils Thyrine3 

'Authorities:  For  expressions  of  the  emotions — Darwin:  'Expressions  of  the 
Emotions  in  Man  and  Animals;'  Ribot:  'The  Psychology  of  the  Emotions.'  For 
effects  of  the  autocoids — Biedl:  'The  Internal  Secretory  Organs;'  Schafer:  'The  En- 
docrine Organs;'  Gley:  'The  Internal  Secretions;'  Cannon:  'Bodily  Changes  in  Pain, 
Hunger,  Fear  and  Rage;'  Crile:  'Man — An  Adaptive  Mechanism.' 

2  While  there  is  very  little  known  in  regard  to  these  points  there  is  an  undoubted 
connection  between  the  thyroid  and  the  phenomena  of  lactation  and  menstruation. 
Ott  and  Scott  state  that  iodothyrine  inhibits  lactation  while  Hertoghe  claims  the 
exact  opposite.     (Bell:  'The  Sex  Complex,'  p.  89.)     During  menstruation  there  seems 
to  be  evidence  of  thyroid  deficiency,  since  psychic  disorders  due  to  the  disturbance  are 
relieved  by  the  administration  of  thyroid  extract.     Biedl  believes  that  the  tetany 
sometimes  associated  with  menstruation,  lactation  and  pregnancy  is  due  to  metabolic 
disturbances  set  up  by  the  functioning  of  the  female  organs.     (Biedl:  'The  Internal 
Secretory  Organs,'  p.  44.)     The  arresting  of  menstruation  in  fear  may  possibly  be 
due  to  the  diversion  of  the  thyrine  from  the  genital  organs.     This,  however,  is  pure 
conjecture.     Ott  and  Scott  also  claim  that  adrenin  inhibits  lactation.     I  know  of  no 
record  of  any  effect  of  adrenin  in  delaying  or  promoting  menstruation. 

3  Also  characteristic  of  adrenin  but  in  a  less  degree.     These  are  the  most  marked 
and  distressing  features  of  exophthalmic  goiter,  a  disease  of  hyperthyroidism. 


IMMOBILITY  79 

forms  of  the  emotion  there  is  clear  evidence  of  thyroid  ac- 
tivity. In  making  this  comparison  we  should  be  on  the 
lookout  for  manifestations  of  adrenal  activity,  for  it  is  to 
these  glands  that  current  theory  ascribes  the  organic  basis 
of  both  fear  and  anger. 

The  chain  of  evidence  seems  complete.  Starting  with 
the  death  feint  as  an  exceptional  primitive  form  of  the  fear 
reaction,  we  were  able  to  discover  traces  of  a  similar  mechan- 
ism through  the  various  orders  up  to  man.  In  man  our  mater- 
ial pointed  to  the  identity  of  this  mechanism  with  the  thyroid. 
Then  by  a  comparison  of  the  known  expressions  of  fear  and 
the  known  effects  of  thyrine  we  were  able  to  show  that  the 
thyroid  plays  an  overwhelming  part  in  the  production  of  the 
emotion,  and,  since  the  unrestrained  functioning  of  the 
thyroid  produces  a  state  of  complete  immobility,  it  follows 
that  the  fundamental  'impulse'  of  the  emotion  must  partake 
of  this  character.  To  complete  our  argument  for  a  specific 
organic  complex  we  shall  proceed  to  a  similar  comparsion 
of  the  expressions  and  autocoids  observed  in  anger. 

EXPRESSIONS  OF  ANGER 

Flushed  face Thyrine 

Deep  respiration Adrenin 

Muscular  contraction Adrenin 

Salivation Adrenin 

It  is  significant  that  the  visceral  expressions  of  anger  are 
meager  as  compared  with  those  of  fear.  Ribot  says,  "Anger 
and  fear  form  an  antithesis,  but  the  former  has,  both  physio- 
logically and  psychologically,  a  more  complex  character."1 
Darwin  makes  a  similar  assertion  and  later  observers  have 
been  baffled  by  the  paucity  of  the  expressions  of  anger.  The 
effects  of  adrenin  betray  a  similar  complexity.  On  the 
whole,  it  is  accurate  to  say  that  adrenin  speeds  up  the  con- 
version of  energy  and  prepares  the  organism  for  violent 
effort,  increasing  the  contractibility  of  the  muscles,  immuniz- 
ing against  fatigue,  promoting  coagulation  of  the  blood,  etc. 
It  places  the  body,  as  Cannon  tersely  puts  it,  "upon  a  war 
footing."  It  energizes  and  exhilarates,  whereas  thyrine 
depresses  and  disorganizes. 

1  Ribot:  'Psychology  of  the  Emotions,'  p.  220. 


8o  y.  p.  M'GONIGAL 

It  is  true  that  in  regard  to  the  constriction  and  dilation  of 
the  facial  vessels  these  tables  show  a  contradiction.  It  is 
difficult  to  account  for  this,  though  Cannon  has  suggested 
that  the  effect  may  be  due  to  a  purely  mechanical  result  of 
blood  pressure.1  However,  it  would  not  affect  our  argument 
if  it  were  shown  that  there  were  even  more  crossing  of  effect 
than  this.  It  is  not  contended  that  the  immobility  reaction 
wholly  accounts  for  the  affective  state  of  fear  in  the  higher 
orders.  An  impulse  to  flee  is  distinctly  recognized  and  in 
flight  the  energizing  qualities  of  adrenin  would  be  of  decided 
service.  Under  the  circumstance  the  organic  complexes 
of  the  two  emotions  are  surprisingly  clear  cut. 

1  Cannon:  'Bodily  Changes  in  Pain,  Hunger,  Fear  and  Rage,'  p.  227. 


VOL.  27,  No.  2  March,  1920 


THE  PSYCHOLOGICAL  REVIEW 


CHANGES  IN  SOME  OF  OUR  CONCEPTIONS  AND 
PRACTICES  OF  PERSONNEL1 

BY  WALTER  DILL  SCOTT 

President  of  The  Scott  Company,  Philadelphia  and  Chicago 

The  term  personnel  implies  a  contrast  relationship  to 
material.  Just  as  material  includes  all  the  material  equip- 
ment owned  or  used  by  an  institution  or  organization,  so 
personnel  signifies  all  the  individuals  connected  with  such 
an  institution  or  organization.  If  we  define  applied  psy- 
chology as  the  science  and  art  of  the  control  of  human 
behavior,  a  large  proportion  of  the  field  of  applied  psychology 
is  denoted  by  the  term  personnel  administration. 

Those  of  us  who  are  engaged  directly  in  personnel  adminis- 
tration in  such  organizations  as  educational  institutions,  the 
army,  the  navy,  industry  and  commerce,  use  the  term  per- 
sonnel administration  to  include  securing,  testing,  selecting, 
hiring,  placing,  training,  supervising,  disciplining,  stimulating, 
directing,  transferring,  discharging  and  promoting  each  indi- 
vidual concerned;  and  in  developing  the  morale,  increasing 
the  esprit  de  corps,  and  creating  and  sustaining  a  contented 
and  efficient  group  of  individuals. 

In  this  sense  personnel  administration  is  as  old  as  human 
institutions.  The  practice  of  personnel  could  not  be  post- 
poned awaiting  an  adequate  theoretical  foundation.  Every 
bad  personnel  practice  doubtless  resulted  from  a  false  con- 
ception and  reflects  itself  in  strengthening  rather  than  in 
weakening  the  error.  This  vicious  circle  is  counterbalanced 
by  the  fortunate  circumstance  that  advanced  personnel  prac- 

1  Address  of  the  president,  before  the  American  Psychological  Association,  Cam- 
bridge Meeting,  December,  1919. 

Si 


82  WALTER  DILL  SCOTT 

tice  results  from  true  conceptions  and  reflects  itself  in 
strengthening  and  purifying  the  truth.  Theory  and  practice 
here  as  elsewhere  are  inseparable. 

Because  of  the  importance  of  personnel  administration, 
because  of  its  complexity  and  difficulty,  and  because  of  the 
very  large  amount  of  attention  given  to  its  various  phases, 
no  profound  and  lasting  changes  in  either  the  conceptions 
or  the  practice  of  personnel  are  brought  about  suddenly  or 
by  a  single  one  of  the  numerous  workers  in  this  fceld.  How- 
ever, significant  developments  are  being  brought  about  from 
the  combined  efforts  of  progressive  workers. 

During  the  nineteenth  century  many  advances  were  made 
in  our  conception  of  the  material  world  and  in  our  practice 
of  dealing  with  its  various  factors.  The  twentieth  century 
is  characterized  by  an  appreciation  of  the  personnel  problem, 
by  the  possession  of  the  behavioristic  point  of  view  in  psy- 
chology, and  by  the  presence  of  numerous  trained  experts 
devoting  their  energy  to  the  development  of  the  concepts 
and  practice  of  personnel.  Constantly  increasing  numbers  of 
the  members  of  the  American  Psychological  Association  are 
making  contributions  to  the  field  of  personnel.  It  may  be 
contended  that  no  other  group  of  experts  equals  the  members 
of  this  Association  in  the  number  and  in  the  importance  of 
the  contributions  made — certainly  to  the  theory,  and  possibly 
to  the  practice  of  personnel.  It  is  too  early  in  the  century  to 
present  the  various  contributions  with  adequate  prospective, 
and  to  estimate  their  importance.  My  aim  at  this  time  is  to 
call  attention  to  certain  typical  changes  that  have  come 
about  in  our  conceptions  and  practices  of  personnel  and  to 
encourage  the  members  of  this  association  to  renewed  energy 
in  producing  further  changes. 

The  first  of  these  changes  to  which  attention  is  called  is 
the  conception  of  the  Equality  of  Men  and  the  practices 
associated  with  that  conception.  In  the  ancient  Athenian 
thought  emphasis  was  put  on  the  superiority  of  the  Athenians 
and  the  comparative  inferiority  of  all  other  races.  The 
associated  practice  is  found  in  the  enslavement  of  foreign 
races  and  in  the  custom  of  according  equal  but  unrestricted 


CONCEPTIONS  AND  PRACTICES  OF  PERSONNEL  83 

honor  to  all  the  citizens.  No  citizen  was  assumed  to  be 
superior  to  any  other.  Accordingly  the  casting  of  lots  decided 
which  one  from  among  all  the  citizens  was  to  be  chosen  to 
judge  a  dramatic  or  musical  festival,  to  preside  at  court,  to 
be  a  legislator,  or  for  one  day  at  least  to  hold  the  highest 
office  in  Athens,  or  to  be  an  archon  for  a  year  and  then  a 
permanent  member  of  the  Araeopagus. 

This  same  insistence  on  the  equality  of  men  was  dominant 
in  the  writings  of  many  of  the  great  thinkers  for  two  centuries. 
It  found  expression  even  in  the  writings  of  such  a  Royalist 
as  Thomas  Hobbes,  as  is  indicated  by  the  following  quotation 
from  his  "  Leviathan  ":  "The  question  who  is  the  better  man 
has  no  place  in  the  condition  of  mere  nature;  where,  as  has 
been  shown  before,  all  men  are  equal.  .  .  . 

"Nature  hath  made  men  so  equal  in  the  faculties  of  the 
body  and  mind,  as  that,  though  there  be  found  one  man 
sometimes  manifestly  stronger  in  body  and  quicker  in  mind 
than  another,  yet  when  all  is  reckoned  together  the  difference 
between  man  and  man  is  not  so  considerable  as  that  one  man 
can  therefore  claim  to  himself  any  benefit  to  which  another 
may  not  pretend  as  well  as  he.  For  as  to  the  strength  of  the 
body,  the  weakest  has  strength  enough  to  kill  the  strongest. 
...  As  to  the  faculties  of  the  mind,  I  find  yet  a  greater 
equality  amongst  men  than  that  of  strength.  For  Prudence 
is  but  Experience;  which  equal  time  equally  bestows  on  all 
men,  in  those  things  they  equally  apply  themselves  unto. 
That  which  may  perhaps  make  such  equality  incredible,  is 
but  a  vain  conceit  of  one's  own  wisdom,  which  almost  all 
men  think  they  have  in  a  greater  degree  than  the  Vulgar, 
that  is,  than  all  men  but  themselves,  and  a  few  others,  whom 
by  Fame,  or  for  concurring  with  themselves,  they  approve. 
.  .  .  But  that  proveth  rather  that  men  are  in  that  point 
equal,  than  unequal.  For  there  is  not  ordinarily  a  greater 
sign  of  the  equal  distribution  of  anything,  than  that  every 
man  is  contented  with  his  share." 

It  was  no  mere  accident  that  Thomas  Jefferson  wrote  into 
our  first  official  document  the  doctrine  that  "All  men  are 
created  equal."  He  was  doubtless  thinking  primarily  of  men 


84  WALTER  DILL  SCOTT 

in  their  political  relationship,  but  there  seems  no  reason  to 
interpret  his  meaning  as  confined  to  political  relationships. 
The  associated  practice  of  universal  citizenship  must  not  be 
thought  of  as  an  isolated  phenomenon  but  is  to  be  grouped 
with  all  practices  arising  in  connection  with  the  theory  of 
the  equality  of  talents,  rights,  and  responsibilities. 

The  theory  of  the  equality  of  men  as  related  to  education 
is  strikingly  presented  in  the  following  quotation  from  Adam 
Smith:  "The  difference  of  natural  talents  in  different  men  is, 
in  reality,  much  less  than  we  are  aware  of;  and  the  very 
different  genius  which  appears  to  distinguish  men  of  different 
professions,  when  grown  up  to  >maturity,  is  not  upon  many 
occasions  so  much  the  cause,  as  the  effect  of  the  division  of 
labor.  The  difference  between  the  most  dissimilar  char- 
acters, between  a  philosopher  and  a  common  street  porter, 
for  example,  seems  to  arise  not  so  much  from  nature,  as 
from  habit,  custom,  and  education.  When  they  come  into 
the  world,  and  for  the  first  six  or  eight  years  of  their  existence, 
they  were,  perhaps,  very  much  alike,  and  neither  their 
parents  or  playfellows  could  perceive  any  remarkable  dif- 
ference. About  that  age,  or  soon  after,  they  came  to  be 
employed  in  very  different  occupations.  The  difference  of 
talents  come  then  to  be  taken  notice  of,  and  widens  by 
degrees,  till  at  last  the  vanity  of  the  philosopher  is  willing  to 
acknowledge  scarce  any  resemblance." 

The  conception  of  the  efficacy  of  education  in  modifying 
the  inherent  equality  of  men  is  responsible  for  much  of  the 
good  and  much  of  the  bad  in  American  educational  practices. 
Among  these  may  be  cited,  on  the  one  side,  our  universal 
compulsory  education  and,  on  the  other  side,  the  introduction 
into  the  colored  schools  of  the  South  of  educational  practices 
from  the  classical  preparatory  schools  of  the  North. 

An  unquestioned  acceptance  of  the  concept  of  the  equality 
of  men  results  in  inefficiency  wherever  applied.  In  the  army 
it  results  in  seniority  promotion.  In  labor  unions  it  results 
in  an  insistence  upon  an  equality  of  wages  for  all  the  workers 
of  a  craft.  In  popular  thought  on  matters  of  social  control 
it  leads  to  communism  and  syndicalism.  In  industry  it 


CONCEPTIONS  AND  PRACTICES  OF  PERSONNEL  85 

results  in  the  shaping  of  jobs  to  suit  the  capacity  of  the 
average  man,  with  the  consequent  elimination  of  adequate 
stimulus  to  action  for  the  superior  individuals.  The  concept 
of  the  equality  of  all  normal  adult  men  is  a  psychological 
error  that  has  perverted  the  thinking  and  weakened  the  action 
of  all  peoples  inspired  with  a  true  and  worthy  ideal  of 
democracy. 

Possibly  the  greatest  single  achievement  of  the  members 
of  the  American  Psychological  Association  is  the  establish- 
ment of  the  psychology  of  individual  differences.  You  have 
discovered  that  normal  adult  men  differ  greatly  in  all  human 
capacities  and  attainments.  You  have  demonstrated  that 
such  differences  are  much  greater  than  had  ever  been  imag- 
ined. You  have  found  that  individual  differences  are  rela- 
tively small  in  such  matters  as  height,  weight,  physical 
strength,  and  reaction-time,  but  that  normal  adults  differ 
enormously  in  the  so-called  higher  mental  qualities.  Guided 
by  this  new  conception  of  individual  differences  you  have 
entered  the  schools  and  insisted  that  pupils  be  grouped  by 
their  mental  ages  rather  than  by  their  chronological  ages. 
You  have  entered  the  army  and  urged  that  enlisted  men  be 
assigned  according  to  their  fitness  for  army  tasks  rather  than 
by  the  location  of  their  place  of  enlistment.  You  have 
insisted  that  commissioned  officers  be  promoted  according  to 
merit  rather  than  by  seniority.  You  have  cooperated  with 
progressive  labor  unions  in  developing  a  conception  and  prac- 
tice adequate  to  provide  protection  for  the  weak  and  oppor- 
tunity for  the  strong.  You  have  entered  industry  and  insisted 
that  applicants  be  accepted  according  to  fixed  standards; 
that  workers  be  promoted  according  to  attainments  and  that 
each  employee  be  inspired  by  the  particular  stimulus  most 
effective  for  him.  Your  gospel  of  diversified  talents  is  per- 
meating our  national  thought  and  indicating,  on  the  one 
hand,  the  wisdom  of  a  democracy  utilizing  experts  in  all 
fields  and,  on  the  other  hand,  the  hazard  of  all  methods  of 
social  control  based  on  the  assumed  equality  of  normal  adults. 

A  second  change  in  our  conception  and  practice  of  per- 
sonnel administration  is  seen  in  the  decreasing  importance 


86  WALTER  DILL  SCOTT 

ascribed  to  Reason  as  a  factor  in  determining  human  action. 
For  many  centuries  man  was  defined  as  the  reasoning  animal. 
Aristotle's  "  Logic  "  was  the  standard  textbook  for  all  students 
desiring  to  learn  the  best  method  of  influencing  and  controlling 
men.  For  persuasion  the  syllogism  was  believed  to  be  the 
most  perfect  tool.  Arguments  to  be  effective  must  be  an- 
alyzed and  presented  in  a  logical  form.  The  hearer  was 
supposed  to  criticize  appeals  by  the  most  rigorous  of  logical 
standards. 

The  change  in  this  point  of  view  has  come  about  so 
gradually  that  we  fail  to  appreciate  its  extent.  At  the  hands 
of  certain  authors  the  importance  of  reason  is  minimized 
by  an  emphasis  upon  suggestion  as  descriptive  of  the  process 
of  influencing  men.  Others  contrast  reason  and  instinct, 
urging  the  important  part  instincts  play  not  only  in  the 
behavior  of  young  children  but  also  in  the  more  important 
acts  of  adults. 

Still  other  scientists  stress  the  significance  of  sentiments 
and  emotions,  of  impulse  and  habit,  or  of  other  forms  of 
human  response  not  reducible  to  any  standard  type  of  reason- 
ing. This  change  in  our  concept  of  the  importance  of  reason- 
ing is  observable  in  the  writings  of  modern  psychologists, 
and  is  reflected  also  in  the  practices  of  the  more  progressive 
leaders  in  personnel  administration. 

The  folly  of  treating  workers  merely  as  reasoning  animals 
but  the  wisdom  of  recognizing  the  importance  of  sentiment 
is  strikingly  illustrated  by  the  following  instance: 

The  workers  in  the  men's  clothing  industry,  in  Chicago, 
were  discontented  last  spring,  because  of  various  conditions 
in  the  industry.  To  reduce  this  discontent  some  of  the  com- 
panies increased  wages  10  per  cent.  Company  X.  posted  a 
notice  that  on  July  I,  each  worker  who  remained  loyal  to  the 
firm  until  June  1 3,  would  receive  "  a  special  extra  pay  envelope." 
This  promise  failed  to  change  the  attitude  of  the  workers.  A 
few  weeks  after  the  posting  of  this  notice  the  drive  was  on 
for  the  sale  of  Liberty  Bonds  and  the  President  of  Company 
X.  purchased  $34,000  worth  of  the  bonds  as  a  gift  to  his 
employees.  Each  worker  was  given  a  coupon  good  for  his 


CONCEPTIONS  AND  PRACTICES  OF  PERSONNEL  87 

share  of  the  $34,000  worth  of  bonds.  The  workers  manifested 
no  appreciation  of  this  gift.  On  July  I,  each  worker  received 
a  special  extra  pay  envelope  containing  a  sum  of  money  equal 
to  that  which  he  had  received  on  the  second  week  in  May— 
a  typical  week.  This  generosity  resulted  in  expression  of 
discontent  among  the  rank  and  file  of  the  workers.  The 
president  of  the  company  was  much  disappointed  by  the 
failure  of  his  program  and  called  into  conference  on  the  subject 
the  local  labor  leader.  I  was  asked  to  be  present  also.  The 
following  is  the  substance  of  the  conversation  between  the 
president  of  Company  X.  and  the  labor  leader. 

President  X:  "I  can't  understand  the  lack  of  appreciation 
of  my  men.  I  gave  them  $34,000  worth  of  Liberty  bonds 
and  a  special  extra  pay  envelope  of  a  full  week's  wages.  The 
union  agreement  has  now  put  all  the  firms  on  an  equal  wage 
basis.  Although  I  did  not  increase  wages  10  per  cent,  for 
the  period  preceding  the  union  agreement  I  have  given  my 
men  more  than  any  other  company  by  the  extra  pay  envelope 
and  the  Liberty  bonds.  I  can't  see  what  more  they  want." 

The  Labor  Leader:  "Yes,  Mr.  X,  you  have  done  all  you 
say  and  your  people  are  not  contented  as  the  people  are  at  the 
other  houses.  They  wanted  the  10  per  cent,  and  felt  that 
they  had  deserved  it." 

President  X:  "No,  I  did  not  give  them  the  10  per  cent., 
but  I  did  give  the  extra  pay  envelope  and  the  Liberty  bonds 
which  amounted  to  much  more  than  the  10  per  cent." 

Labor  Leader:  "Yes,  I  have  figured  it  up  and  you  gave 
them  in  extra  pay  and  bonds  somewhat  over  $10,000  more 
than  they  would  have  received  by  the  increase  they  asked. 
But  that  is  not  what  they  wanted.  They  do  not  want  the 
gift  of  the  extra  pay  envelope  and  of  the  bonds  but  they  do 
want  the  10  per  cent,  even  if  it  is  less  than  the  extra  pay  and 
the  bonds.  I  believe  they  would  be  willing  to  refund  the 
$34,000  worth  of  bonds  if  you  would  give  them  the  $24,000 
in  what  they  regard  as  earned  wages." 

President  X:  "Very  well,  I  will  gladly  make  the  exchange 
for  I  shall  thereby  gain  $10,000. 

Labor  Leader:    "I  think  the  discontent  will  be  greatly 


88  WALTER  DILL  SCOTT 

reduced  by  the  exchange.     I  will  take  it  up  with  the  people 
at  once." 

The  proposition  was  presented  to  the  workers  and  was 
accepted  enthusiastically  even  though  it  entailed  a  recognized 
monetary  loss  of  $10,000.  However,  it  restored  their  offended 
pride  and  left  them  happy. 

The  President  reasoned  as  follows: 
Major  premise,  All  wage  earners  prefer  the  greater  to  the 

lesser  amount  of  money. 
Minor  premise,  The  extra  pay  and  the  bonds  is  greater  than 

the  10  per  cent,  increase. 
Conclusion,  Therefore,   the  workers  prefer  the  bonds   and 

the  extra  pay. 

The  experienced  labor  leader  recognized  that  working 
people  are  influenced  as  much  by  pride  and  by  sentiment  as 
by  the  logic  of  the  greater  gain.  He  knew  that  strikes,  and 
demands  for  more  pay  and  shorter  hours  are  frequently  but 
a  defense  reaction  against  offended  pride,  and  that  the 
rational  interpretation  placed  on  such  action  is  usually  as  false 
as  the  interpretation  of  President  X  upon  the  actions  of 
his  men.  The  industrial  leader  who  seeks  to  comprehend 
and  to  lead  his  men  to-day  finds  little  assistance  in  Aristotle's 
logic  or  in  any  conception  that  stresses  the  logical  reasoning 
ability  of  man.  He  does,  however,  receive  great  assistance 
from  the  newer  emphasis  on  the  non-rational  aspects  of 
human  actions,  as  expounded  by  the  members  of  this  Asso- 
ciation. 

The  third  betterment  in  personnel  administration  to  which 
attention  is  called  is  that  of  the  change  in  our  conception  and 
practice  of  Education.  To  the  popular  mind  education  is 
frequently  assumed  to  be  identical  with  learning,  with  the 
acquisition  of  information  more  or  less  useful,  with  the  com- 
mitting to  memory  of  the  deeds  and  thoughts  of  forefathers 
more  or  less  worthy,  and  with  the  perpetuation  of  the  classical 
culture  whether  that  be  interpreted  to  mean  Greek,  Roman, 
Hebrew,  Turkish,  Chinese,  or  Germanic. 

Education  is  thought  of  as  esoteric, — as  a  thing  quite 
apart  from  everyday  life.  It  manifests  itself  as  culture  for 


CONCEPTIONS  AND  PRACTICES  OF  PERSONNEL  89 

culture's  sake,  as  art  for  art's  sake,  or  as  pure  science  un- 
contaminated  with  any  possible  practical  results.  A  deep 
gulf  is  assumed  to  separate  learning  and  doing,  theory  and 
practice,  the  school  and  the  shop. 

All  these  conceptions  and  distinctions  cease  to  be  signifi- 
cant as  soon  as  we  take  the  modern  behavioristic  point  of 
view  and  define  education  as  profiting  by  experience.  Train- 
ing is  the  result  of  the  reactions  made  by  the  individual 
being  trained.  The  laws  of  Solon  may  be  'imparted'  to  a 
phonographic  record,  a  parrot  may  repeat  certain  phrases 
of  the  Koran  and  an  imbecile  can  commit  to  memory  the 
significant  dates  of  Roman  history.  These  instances  are  not 
descriptive  of  education  as  we  think  of  it  today  because  they 
are  not  instances  in  any  real  sense  of  profiting  by  experience. 

In  playing  with  fire  the  child  secures  training  which  in  the 
fullest  sense  is  education.  He  learns  to  set  up  a  series  of 
withdrawal  reactions  and  to  profit  thereby  in  his  increased 
ability  to  establish  this  particular  form  of  reaction  when 
facing  similar  situations. 

The  youth  receives  training  in  solving  a  mathematical 
problem  if  in  solving  it  he  has  acquired  a  new  way  of  analyzing 
a  mathematical  situation  and  can  make  use  of  it  when  such 
situations  arise  again.  He  receives  training  in  the  reading 
of  Homer  if  in  the  study  he  acquires  a  new  form  of  reaction 
and  is  enabled  to  profit  by  this  new  possibility  of  action 
whether  it  be  in  additional  reading,  in  appreciating  literary 
style  in  another  author,  in  improved  diction  on  his  own  part, 
or  in  comprehending  human  action. 

The  mechanic  at  the  bench  may  be  receiving  an  education 
if  he  is  profiting  by  his  experience.  In  solving  a  mechanical 
difficulty  he  may  be  acquiring  a  new  form  of  thought  that 
may  be  repeated  more  readily  when  a  similar  situation  is  met 
again.  As  a  member  of  a  group  of  workers  he  may  acquire 
a  form  of  social  response  that  may  appear  more  readily  and 
be  more  effective  with  each  repetition.  As  a  member  of  a 
shop  committee  his  contact  with  the  employer's  representative 
may  change  his  entire  point  of  view  on  industrial,  social,  and 
political  philosophy.  In  dealing  with  subordinates  he  may 


90  WALTER  DILL  SCOTT 

accidently  or  thoughtfully  acquire  a  type  of  reaction  that 
fits  him  for  more  important  executive  duties.  The  reading 
of  a  magazine  article,  the  action  of  an  associate,  the  chance 
juxtaposition  of  two  pieces  of  material  may  cause  him  to 
think  a  new  thought  or  perform  a  new  act  which  may  better 
equip  him  to  meet  new  and  important  duties.  The  signifi- 
cant thing  about  these  new  reactions  is  that  they  are  new  and 
can  be  repeated  with  benefit. 

According  to  this  conception  there  is  no  rigid  demarcation 
between  school  and  society,  between  the  pupil's  desk  and  the 
employee's  bench  or  counter.  In  all  these  instances  the 
individual  has  experiences.  Whether  such  experiences  should 
be  classed  as  education  or  not  depends  less  on  the  particular 
geographical  location  than  on  the  response  resulting  from 
the  experience. 

When  education  is  defined  as  profiting  by  experience,  the 
personnel  director  is  faced  with  the  double  responsibility, 
first,  of  providing  educative  experience,  and  second,  of  assist- 
ing the  individual  to  obtain  the  maximum  of  profit  from  the 
experiences  provided.  The  worker  in  repetitive  manufactur- 
ing processes  may  not  be  provided  with  adequate  educative 
experiences  and  the  student  in  college  may  not  be  profiting 
sufficiently  by  his  experiences  no  matter  how  rich  they  be  in 
potentialities. 

Our  educators  in  institutions  of  learning  are  aware  that 
richness  of  content  does  not  guarantee  educative  response  on 
the  part  of  the  student,  so  adequate  responses  are  sought  as 
an  essential  part  of  all  courses  of  instruction.  In  business 
organizations  need  for  varied  experiences  for  each  individual 
is  beginning  to  be  recognized.  Steps  are  being  taken  to 
provide  this  variety  by  teaching  the  worker  not  merely  one 
job  but  by  teaching  him  many  jobs  or  by  providing  richness 
of  content  in  other  ways. 

In  planning  his  training  program  the  personnel  director  is 
coming  to  see  that  his  responsibility  is  not  met  by  providing 
formal  classroom  continuation  school  instruction  for  the 
youths  who  are  ambitious  or  for  others  compelled  by  law  to 
take  such  instruction.  His  is  a  greater  responsibility  and 


CONCEPTIONS  AND  PRACTICES  OF  PERSONNEL  9l 

ideally  demands  that  he  should  supply  each  employee  with 
richness  of  experience  and  provide  also  that  each  worker 
should  profit  continuously  by  his  experiences  as  an  individual 
worker,  as  a  member  of  the  entire  body  of  employees,  as  a 
prospective  junior  executive,  as  a  member  of  a  family,  and 
as  a  citizen  of  the  state. 

A  fourth  change  to  which  attention  should  be  called  is 
that  of  the  emphasis  of  the  Biological  Relationship  existing 
between  the  worker  and  his  work.  For  a  long  time  we  have 
used  the  evolutionary-biological  point  of  view  in  interpreting 
the  relationship  of  man  and  the  world  in  which  he  lives.  We 
have  gradually  ceased  to  think  of  man  and  his  environment  as 
two  contrasted  and  more  or  less  independent  entities.  We  no 
longer  think  of  him  as  the  result  of  a  special  creation  coming 
into  his  world  and  subduing  it.  On  the  contrary,  we  think 
of  man  as  a  result  of  an  evolutionary  process  in  which  man 
and  the  world  were  mutually  involved.  The  general  bio- 
logical point  of  view  is  stressed  in  anthropology  and  sociology 
but  rarely  in  attempts  to  interpret  the  industrial  worker. 
This  very  necessary  point  in  evaluating  the  concepts  and 
practices  of  personnel  administration  is  clearly  expressed  in 
extracts  from  an  unpublished  report  of  the  Scott  Company 
Laboratory  on  'A  Point  of  View  in  Industrial  Personnel.' 

"In  order  to  attain  an  insight  at  all  adequate  into  the 
field  of  industrial  personnel,  we  must  abandon  any  statement 
which  contrasts,  or  which  even  sets  off  against  one  another, 
men  and  jobs.  On  the  contrary,  we  must  see  clearly  that 
the  industrial  situation,  the  productive  complex,  is  organically 
not  two  things,  but  one;  not  men  and  over  against  them  jobs, 
but  in  reality  worker s-in-their-work.  In  this  active,  shifting 
unity,  this  intangible,  ever-changing  reality,  the  vital  prob- 
lems of  industrial  adjustment  exist. 

"There  is  a  basic  difference  between  this  concept  and  the 
older  point  of  view  toward  personnel.  The  latter  notion  is 
perhaps  most  crudely  stated  as  'Putting  square  pegs  into 
square  holes.'  For  the  sake  of  brevity  and  concreteness, 
let  us  call  this  the  'square  peg'  concept.  Clearly,  there  is  a 
family  resemblance  between  the  square  peg  concept  and  the 


92  WALTER  DILL  SCOTT 

statement  that  personnel  work  consists  of  man-analysis,  job- 
analysis  and  the  bringing  of  man  and  job  together.  Man- 
analysis  is  essentially  discovering  the  shape  of  the  peg; 
job-analysis  is  essentially  discovering  the  shape  of  the  hole. 
The  phrase  The  Right  Man  in  the  Right  Place  is  the  slogan  of  a 
personnel  philosophy  of  the  square  peg  variety. 

"The  inadequacy  of  the  square  peg  concept  arises  from 
its  sharp  discrimination  between  man  and  job — man  on  the 
one  side,  job  on  the  other  side,  with  an  act  of  bringing  man 
and  job  together.  Here  we  have  drawn  for  us  two  separate 
entities,  static,  self-sufficient;  our  task  seems  to  be  to  make 
as  good  fits  as  possible.  The  coldness,  the  rigidity,  the 
sterility  of  this  point  of  view  is  evident;  it  is  not  surprising 
that  it  results  so  frequently  in  a  mechanically  impersonal, 
jigsaw-puzzle  attitude  toward  the  problems  of  industrial 
personnel.  To  fit  the  right  man  in  the  right  place,  to  put 
the  square  peg  in  the  square  hole,  these  are  relatively  fruitless 
concepts  for  meeting  the  plastic,  living  problems  of  industrial 
adjustment.  .  .  . 

"Our  point  of  view  differs  from  the  square  peg  concept  in 
that  it  shows  the  worker-in-his-work  as  a  unity,  a  developing, 
living  situation,  as  a  productive  complex,  organically  one. 
We  do  not  think  of  the  hiring  of  the  worker  as  the  connecting 
of  a  man  with  a  job;  it  is  the  creation  of  a  worker-in-his-work 
situation,  the  birth  of  a  new  productive  complex.  We  do 
not  think  of  the  release  of  a  worker  as  the  separating  of  a 
man  from  his  job;  it  is  the  destruction  of  a  worker-in-his- 
work  situation,  the  death  of  a  productive  complex.  Square 
peg  philosophy  regards  as  fundamental,  structural  diversity, 
the  man  and  the  job,  the  worker  and  the  work.  Our  point 
of  view  regards  as  fundamental,  functional  unity,  the  man- 
in-his-job,  the  worker-in-his-work.  .  .  . 

"The  problems  of  industrial  adjustment  are  conceived 
to  be  not  so  much  those  of  fitting  together  worker  and  work, 
but  rather  those  of  securing  the  healthy  development  of  an 
organic  unity,  the  worker-in-his-work.  The  worker-in-his 
work  is  viewed  as  a  living  and  changing  situation,  as  the 
functional  element  of  the  great  industrial  and  social  organism, 
plastic  and  unstable.  .  .  . 


CONCEPTIONS  AND  PRACTICES  OF  PERSONNEL  93 

"Personnel  work  involves  the  shaping  of  the  growth  of 
this  productive  complex  in  forms  of  greatest  economic  effec- 
tiveness and  ultimate  social  value." 

As  a  final  point  attention  is  called  to  the  change  that  is 
being  brought  about  in  our  conceptions  and  practice  of  Voca- 
tional Guidance.  The  caste  system  of  India,  and  allied  systems 
in  other  lands,  the  European  guilds  of  the  middle-ages, 
inheritance,  opportunities  for  jobs  available  in  the  vicinity, 
social  approval  and  disapproval  of  certain  occupations — these 
are  among  the  factors  that  have  been  dominant  in  vocational 
guidance.  Such  general,  non-commercial,  and  unadvertis- 
able  systems  have  been  unable  to  retain  a  monopoly  on 
vocational  guidance.  There  have  sprung  up  special  systems, 
proporting  to  be  infallible,  in  the  guidance  or  the  selection 
of  individuals.  These  systems  have  had  great  vogue  in  all 
ages  and  today  many  of  them  are  being  sold  to  the  so-called 
hard-headed  business  men  in  every  city  in  America.  In  the 
list  of  such  so-called  "infallible  systems"  are  included  the 
following:  astrology,  augury,  chance  as  manifested  in  drawing 
of  straws,  casting  of  lots  or  the  flipping  of  a  coin,  chirography, 
chiromancy,  clairvoyance,  character  analysis,  divination,  for- 
tune-telling, horoscopes,  hypnotism,  intuition,  magic,  med- 
iums, mind  reading,  necromancy,  omens,  occultism,  oracles, 
palmistry,  phrenology,  physiognomy,  premonitions,  psycho- 
logical tests,  soothsaying,  sorcery,  sortilege,  subconscious 
hunches,  stigmata,  talismans,  trade  tests  and  telepathy. 
When  none  of  the  systems  here  cited  have  been  depended  on 
we  commonly  resort  to  the  judgment  of  the  maiden  school 
teacher,  of  the  indulgent  mother,  of  the  ambitious  father, 
of  the  mercenary  employment  agent,  of  the  hustling  labor 
scout,  or  of  the  listless  recruiting  officer.  Vocational  guidance 
has  been  on  an  utterly  unscientific  basis  and  has  been  wholly 
inadequate.  However,  no  great  improvement  could  be  ex- 
pected until  a  comprehensive  job  analysis  of  available  voca- 
tions had  been  made,  until  a  technique  of  testing  individuals 
had  been  provided  by  experimental  psychology  and  until  the 
point  of  view  of  the  biological  unity  of  the  worker-in-his- 
work  had  been  recognized.  During  the  past  few  years  fairly 


94  WALTER  DILL  SCOTT 

adequate  job  analyses  have  been  made  of  most  positions  in 
many  of  our  industrial  and  commercial  organizations.  Year 
by  year  progress  is  being  made  by  our  laboratories  in  measur- 
ing the  talents,  capacities,  and  skill  of  individuals.  Great 
advance  has  been  made  in  our  understanding  of  human 
nature  and  in  the  creating  of  a  practical  biological  point  of 
view  of  the  worker-in-his-work.  The  advance  in  vocational 
guidance  may  be  adequately  symbolized  by  the  change  from 
the  stage  in  which  dependence  was  placed  on  the  casting 
of  lots  to  the  stage  in  which  dependence  is  placed  on  the  tono- 
scope  and  similar  instruments  of  precision;  or  from  the  stage 
in  which  results  were  expressed  in  the  ambiguous  mutterings 
of  mediums  to  the  stage  in  which  results  are  expressed  by 
coefficients  of  correlation  and  by  regression  coefficients  or  by 
other  exact  statistical  formulations. 

Of  the  changes  in  our  conceptions  and  practices  of  per- 
sonnel administration  mention  has  been  made  of  five  that 
are  more  or  less  typical  of  the  many  that  might  be  cited. 
The  importance  of  these  changes  is  very  great,  both  for  the 
development  of  the  science  of  psychology  and  for  the  welfare 
of  the  human  race.  It  has  been  estimated  that  during  the 
nineteenth  century  the  power  of  the  human  race  to  produce 
food,  clothing  and  shelter  was  doubled  by  the  application  of 
increased  knowledge  of  the  material  elements  of  the  universe. 
All  the  significant  advances  in  knowledge  of  the  material 
world  were  brought  about  by  possibly  a  few  thousand  pro- 
gressive minds  devoted  to  that  study. 

It  is  quite  probable  that  the  productive  power  of  the 
human  race  is  being  doubled  again  during  the  present  century. 
The  benefits  of  this  advance  will  be  divided  between  better 
adjustments  of  the  material  world  to  the  needs  of  man,  and 
the  better  adjustments  of  man  to  man.  Such  an  increase  in 
the  efficiency  of  the  race  will  probably  be  due  to  the  advance 
in  our  knowledge  of  personnel  rather  than  to  further  increase 
in  our  knowledge  of  the  material  universe.  If  a  few  thousand 
men  in  their  study  of  the  material  world  served  their  science 
and  the  race  so  effectively,  those  of  us  who  are  engaged  in  the 
study  of  personnel  may  get  a  glimpse  of  the  responsibility 
and  the  opportunity  that  is  ours. 


AN  ANALYSIS  OF  EFFORT 

BY  JOHN  J.  B.  MORGAN 

University  of  Minnesota 

The  concept  of  will  as  outlined  by  the  early  faculty 
psychologists  has  been  discarded,  and  rightly  so,  by  modern 
genetic  psychology.  The  will  as  a  spiritual  entity  which 
served  to  redirect,  supply  and  control  energy  for  the  different 
responses  of  an  organism  not  only  failed  to  explain  many  of 
the  phenomena  which  gave  rise  to  the  formulation  of  the 
will  concept,  but  in  addition  lent  an  air  of  mystery  which  in 
itself  inhibited  the  scientific  investigation  of  the  processes 
it  purported  to  explain. 

The  concept  of  dynamogenesis,  which  took  the  place  of 
the  will  concept,  assumes  that  a  sensorial  stimulus  not  only 
tends  to  find  a  direct  response  of  some  special  sort  but 
affects  more  or  less  remotely  other  parts  of  the  organism. 
This  diffusion  of  energy  from  an  incoming  impulse  depends 
upon  the  condition  of  the  organism  as  determined  by  its 
entire  past  history,  upon  other  stimuli  acting  at  the  same 
time,  as  well  as  upon  the  nature  of  the  stimulus  itself.  Psy- 
chologically the  previous  stimuli  and  experiences  of  the 
organism  may  be  considered  as  setting  the  organism  in  a 
certain  state  of  readiness  or  unreadiness.  The  task  (Aufgabe) 
—the  set  of  the  organism,  or  the  directions  received — facili- 
tates one  reaction  and  inhibits  another.  The  directions  to 
add  two  numbers  facilitate  the  adding  of  the  numbers  and 
inhibit  any  tendency  to  multiply  or  subtract.  If  a  man  has 
been  placed  in  an  attitude  of  anger  this  state  of  his  organism 
will  cause  him  to  become  highly  irritated  by  a  relatively 
mild  stimulus.  Such  a  simple  reflex  as  the  knee  jerk  is 
affected  by  other  stimuli  acting  at  the  same  time,  such  as 
martial  music,  the  cry  of  an  infant  or  other  significant  noises.1 

1  Lombard,  W.  P.,  'The  Variations  of  the  Normal  Knee-jerk  and  their  Relations 
to  the  Activity  of  the  Central  Nervous  System,'  Amer.  J.  of  Psych.,  1887,  i,  5-71. 

95 


96  JOHN  J.  S.  MORGAN 

Finally,  a  single  stimulus  if  pleasant  will  cause  a  different 
reaction  from  a  single  unpleasant  stimulus.  One  may  smack 
his  lips  over  a  bit  of  candy  but  his  whole  organism  may 
respond  in  an  effort  to  eject  some  disgusting  bite. 

By  very  carefully  marshalling  the  facts  of  stimulus  and 
response,  psychology  has  been  able  to  explain  most  of  human 
behavior  by  a  direct  relation  of  each  response  to  some  stimulus 
more  or  less  remote.  Some  difficulties  have  arisen  in  connec- 
tion with  stimuli  which  elicited  no  immediate  observable 
response  and  with  responses  for  which  there  were  no  imme- 
diately preceding  adequate  stimuli.  Many  of  the  seeming 
difficulties  disappear  when  the  human  organism  is  regarded 
as  an  integrating  mechanism,  and  the  working  concept  of 
modern  psychology  is  no  doubt  the  concept  that  every 
organism  is  a  highly  balanced  system  of  forces,  whose  integrity 
depends  upon  the  maintenance  of  a  certain  balance.  Each 
stimulus  is  received  into  this  system  and  is  modified  by  the 
condition  of  the  balance  at  that  time  and  its  response  can 
only  be  interpreted  in  the  light  of  its  relation  to  all  its  previous 
experiences  as  well  as  to  all  the  other  forces  acting  upon  it 
at  that  time. 

Now,  the  question  at  the  crux  of  this  whole  situation  is, 
what  is  this  tendency  to  maintain  a  balance?  The  term  used 
in  the  will  psychology  to  express  this  fact  was  effort.  The 
individual  was  presumed  to  make  an  effort  to  maintain  his 
'personality.'  If  a  hostile  stimulus  was  received  he  made  an 
effort  to  overcome  it.  The  moral  crisis  was  the  place  where 
this  manifestation  appeared  in  its  supreme  state.  It  is  the 
sort  of  conflict  which  James  describes  in  his  classic  fifth 
type  of  decision.1  Why  is  it  that  "when  a  dreadful  object 
is  presented,  or  when  life  as  a  whole  turns  up  its  dark  abysses 
to  our  view,  the  worthless  ones  among  us  lose  their  hold  on 
the  situation  altogether  .  .  .  and  collapse  into  yielding  masses 
of  plaintiveness  and  fear";  while  the  'heroic  mind'  holds 
itself  erect,  faces  the  situation,  and  'makes  himself  one  of 
the  masters  and  lords  of  life'?  This  question  is  still  present 
even  when  the  situation  is  restated  in  behavioristic  terms, 

1  'Principles  of  Psychology/  1899,  II.,  534-535. 


AN  ANALYSIS  OF  EFFORT  97 

but  it  is  simplified  if  one  recognizes  that  such  a  question 
resolves  itself  into  a  query  as  to  why  individuals  differ  in 
their  capacity  to  maintain  their  balance.  We  should  expect 
the  trait  to  vary;  what  we  wish  to  know  is:  What  is  this 
trait?  What  is  effort?  What  is  meant  by  maintaining  one's 
balance? 

This  paper  is  an  attempt  to  show  that  the  concept  of  effort 
is  an  elementary  principle  of  all  organic  life  which  is  as  funda- 
mental as  the  most  firmly  established  reflex.  To  do  this  we 
will  first  indicate  where  effort  is  best  seen,  we  will  show  facts 
which  indicate  its  elementary  nature  and  finally  try  to  de- 
scribe how  the  more  complex  situations  in  which  effort  is 
revealed  are  developments  from  this  elementary  background. 

The  customary  definition  of  effort  is :  '  the  result  or  display 
of  consciously  directed  power.'  This  definition  is  itself  a 
product  of  will  psychology  and  in  order  to  get  away  from  the 
implications  connected  with  the  phrase  'consciously  directed' 
we  will  have  to  change  our  definition  to  read  'the  result  or 
display  of  organic  power.'  This  is  not  doing  violence  to  the 
term.  The  central  idea  is  the  display  of  power;  organic 
has  been  used  in  place  of  consciously  directed.  Power  may 
result  in  either  of  two  situations,  (i)  When  a  stimulus  is 
received  whose  natural  response  would  cause  a  loss  of  balance, 
the  stimulus  does  not  give  rise  to  its  normal  reaction. 
Either  'power'  is  exerted  by  the  other  forces  to  divert  the 
stimulus  to  an  unusual  response,  or  it  is  merely  inhibited. 
(2)  In  the  second  case  the  organism  may  need  to  make  a 
certain  response  in  order  to  maintain  its  balance.  Any 
opposition  to  this  response  will  be  opposed.  The  combined 
forces  of  the  organism  will  tend  to  break  down  this  resistance. 
It  is  effort  in  these  two  senses  and  not  with  its  will  implications 
which  we  will  attempt  to  analyze. 

MANIFESTATIONS  OF  EFFORT 

Effort  may  be  seen  when  an  organism  is  learning  to  react 
to  a  novel  situation.  When  an  organism  encounters  a  situa- 
tion, the  situation  is  in  itself  a  stimulus  to  activity.  If  the 
activity  produces  a  favorable  impression  the  organism  con- 


9$  JOHN  J.  B.  MORGAN 

tinues  to  respond  in  the  same  manner  to  that  situation.  If 
the  result  is  not  satisfactory  a  new  reaction  is  tried.  This 
may  be  considered  an  effort  to  meet  this  situation — it  is  the 
first  stage  of  effort — the  connection  between  stimulus  and 
response  is  simple  and  direct;  but  the  effort  we  mean  to 
analyze  is  a  more  complex  affair.  Suppose  the  organism  is 
placed  in  a  new  situation  and  makes  the  traditional  random 
movements  in  reacting  to  this  situation.  If  all  the  movements 
fail  the  organism  could  do  one  of  two  things;  it  could  stop 
its  activity  and  go  to  sleep  or  it  could  increase  the  violence 
of  its  responses  to  the  point  where  it  would  be  frantic  in  its 
struggles.  The  increase  in  power  displayed  in  the  activity 
of  the  organism  when  its  responses  fail  to  solve  the  situation 
is  what  we  mean  by  effort.  The  situation  is  the  stimulus  to 
random  movements;  the  situation  plus  the  failure  of  the 
random  movements  is  the  stimulus  to  effort  or  the  display  of 
power.  The  failure  is  the  added  resistance  in  the  situation 
and  the  effort  is  the  reaction  of  the  organism  to  meet  the 
resistance. 

As  a  specific  example,  suppose  a  dog  tried  to  gain  entrance 
to  this  room.  He  could  come  to  the  door  and  make  several 
reactions  to  the  fact  that  it  is  closed.  He  could  whine, 
scratch,  push  at  the  crack  with  his  nose  and  bark.  After 
failing  to  gain  access  he  could  either  go  lie  down  or  could 
increase  the  violence  of  his  efforts  until  the  whole  neighbor- 
hood becomes  disturbed  by  the  intensity  of  his  howling. 
In  this  sense  effort  is  a  direct  response  to  a  stimulus  and  the 
stimulus  is  the  amount  of  resistance  that  the  organism  en- 
counters. 

Effort  may  be  the  response  to  a  specific  condition  of  the 
organism,  such  as  fatigue,  sickness,  etc.,  which  renders  it 
difficult  for  it  to  make  the  normal  response.  An  illustration 
of  this  role  of  effort  is  seen  in  the  case  of  an  athletic  contest. 
The  athlete  starts  the  foot  race  as  a  response  to  the  presence 
of  the  crowd  and  his  competitors.  Gradually  fatigue  sets 
in  and  the  stimuli  of  his  associates  and  the  crowd  weaken 
until  he  is  impelled  to  stop.  He  feels  as  though  he  would  die 
if  he  goes  any  further.  He  has  no  stimulus  within  or  without 


AN  ANALYSIS  OF  EFFORT  99 

to  keep  up  this  useless  running  but  he  keeps  up  impelled  by 
nothing  but  the  stimulus  of  the  opposition  his  organism  is 
receiving  and  the  habits  he  has  formed  of  persisting  in  spite 
of  opposition. 

In  many  different  psychological  analyses  the  phenomenon 
of  effort  is  given  a  prominent  place.  In  discussing  the  effects 
of  practice  the  statement  is  made  by  investigators  that  effort 
must  be  directed  toward  improvement:  that,  if  effort  is 
directed  toward  increase  in  accuracy,  an  increase  in  accuracy 
will  appear;  if  effort  is  directed  toward  an  increase  in  speed, 
an  increase  in  speed  will  appear;  or,  if  effort  is  directed 
toward  improvement  in  both  speed  and  accuracy,  both  speed 
and  accuracy  will  be  improved.  Investigators  of  memory 
make  the  statement  that  the  learner  must  direct  his  efforts 
toward  memorizing  in  order  to  make  the  memorizing  effective. 
All  discussions  of  attention  point  out  two  kinds  of  attention; 
involuntary  and  voluntary.  Voluntary  attention  requires 
effort  on  the  part  of  the  individual.  Successful  reasoning  is 
conditioned  upon  the  reasoner  holding  the  problem  to  be 
solved  against  irrelevant  suggestions  and  distractions.  This 
process  requires  the  direction  of  effort  against  stimuli  which 
are  unfavorable  for  a  proper  solution. 

Finally,  effort  is  seen  in  the  moral  conflicts  of  the  indi- 
vidual. The  instincts  or  the  acquired  complexes  of  the  indi- 
vidual tend  to  make  him  react  in  some  particular  way  to 
specific  situations.  Society  says  he  cannot  act  in  this  way 
without  receiving  punishment  therefor.  If  the  threatened 
social  punishment  is  able  to  exert  force  enough  the  tendency 
to  act  may  be  inhibited;  there  may  be  a  balancing  of  forces 
with  no  apparent  activity.  James  describes  a  case  in  which 
social  pressure  is  not  sufficient  to  inhibit  activity,  where  the 
individual  feels  that  he  either  will  not  be  caught  or  that  he 
will  be  excused  in  case  he  is  caught.  He  has  nothing  to  lose 
by  refraining  from  an  act  except  his  moral  integrity,  and 
even  this  loses  its  restraining  potency.  The  individual  feels 
that  by  his  own  wilful  act  he  is  making  the  decision.  This 
is  an  illustration  of  the  conflict  of  stimuli  and  must  be  carefully 
distinguished  from  the  opposition  to  response.  Where  there 


100  JOHN  J.  B.  MORGAN 

is  opposition  to  the  normal  response  it  was  stated  that  the 
situation  plus  failure  in  response  is  the  stimulus  to  effort. 
Here  we  have  a  balance  between  impulses  neither  of  which 
can  gain  the  ascendancy.  When  a  decision  is  made  it  is 
usually  with  a  violent  impulse  and  not  the  slow  response 
which  is  typical  of  a  nearly  balanced  physical  movement. 
The  decision  means  the  total  inhibition  of  one  or  the  other 
stimuli.  It  is  evidence  that  the  balance,  the  withholding  of 
response,  is  itself  the  stimulus  for  the  organism  to  do  something. 
This  stimulus  arising  from  the  conflict  throws  itself  finally 
on  one  side  or  the  other  and  a  response  occurs. 

THE  ELEMENTARY  NATURE  OF  EFFORT 
Suppose  that  all  the  organisms  in  a  group  reacted  in 
exactly  the  same  way  to  the  same  stimulus,  in  other  words 
suppose  that  there  were  no  such  thing  as  biological  variation. 
In  such  a  case  it  would  be  only  through  accident  that  organ- 
isms could  ever  become  selective  in  their  reactions.  Suppose, 
however,  that  within  a  group  two  organisms  responded  just 
a  little  differently  to  the  same  stimulus.  If  this  stimulus 
was  favorable  to  the  integrity  of  the  organism  the  one  which 
gave  the  most  ready  or  the  strongest  response  would  tend 
to  preserve  its  integrity  better  than  the  other.  Suppose, 
again,  that  the  stimulus  was  light  and  that  light  was  very 
favorable  for  the  organism  in  question.  Those  organisms 
which  responded  favorably  and  most  vigorously  to  a  light 
stimulus  would  have  a  better  chance  to  survive  than  the  ones 
which  were  indifferent  to  light.  Such  selection  would  even- 
tually give  rise  to  a  species  which  would  tend  always  to 
respond  positively  to  light.  (Positively  phototropic).  We 
might  say  tha't  the  organism  'tries'  to  stay  in  the  light,  that 
it  *  exerts'  itself  in  an  'effort  'to  keep  where  it  is  light,  but 
it  can  readily  be  seen  that  this  is  but  a  crude  way  of  stating 
that  through  biological  variation  and  selection  a  positively 
phototropic  species  has  been  evolved. 

Again,  suppose  that  from  seeds  which  tended  to  throw  out 
sprouts  indiscriminately  a  variation  arose  through  which 
some  seeds  tended  to  send  sprouts  toward  moisture.  If 


AN  ANALYSIS  OF  EFFORT  ">' 

moisture  was  favorable  to  the  integrity  of  the  life  of  the  seed 
the  ones  which  showed  the  strongest  tendency  would  survive 
those  in  which  the  tendency  was  lacking.  It  can  easily  be 
seen  how  through  a  long  period  of  selection  a  species  could 
be  evolved  which  would  force  its  roots  into  the  crevices  of 
rocks,  even  raising  tons  of  weight  to  do  so. 

These  principles  of  variation  and  selection  form  the 
groundwork  for  the  development  of  any  biological  trait  no 
matter  how  complex.  The  question  is,  can  effort  be  ex- 
plained as  a  biological  development  of  this  sort?  If  we  can 
show  that  effort  is  a  fundamental  trait  of  organic  matter  at 
different  levels,  we  believe  that  biological  selection  will  ac- 
count for  its  presence.  Biological  evolution  has  been  so 
elaborately  expounded  in  the  literature  and  is  so  widely 
accepted  that  we  scarcely  need  to  defend  it.  All  we  need 
to  do  is  to  show  that  effort  is  a  definite  response  to  a  certain 
condition  and  biological  evolution  will  explain  its  existence. 

i.  Jennings1  has  shown  that  the  behavior  of  lower  organ- 
isms depends  not  only  on  the  external  stimulus  but  on  what 
he  calls  the  physiological  state  of  the  organism.  Physio- 
logical states  are  of  two  kinds,  those  depending  on  the  progress 
of  the  metabolic  processes  of  the  organism,  and  those  other- 
wise determined.  The  latter  are  the  ones  which  concern  us. 
The  'physiological  state'  is  a  dynamic  condition  and  not  a 
static  affair;  it  tends  to  produce  movement.  "This  move- 
ment often  results  in  such  a  change  of  conditions  as  destroys 
the  physiological  state  under  consideration.  But  in  case  it 
does  not,  then  the  second  tendency  of  the  physiological  state 
shows  itself.  It  tends  to  resolve  itself  into  another  and 
different  state.  Condition  I  passes  to  condition  2,  and  this 
again  to  condition  3.  This  tendency  shows  itself  even  when 
the  external  conditions  remain  uniform."  For  example  the 
stentor2  is  capable  of  greatly  different  reactions  under  the 
same  external  stimulation.  If  the  stentor  is  subjected  to  a 
stimulus  which  would  not  be  injurious  unless  applied  for  a 
long  time,  if  the  stimulus  and  other  external  conditions  remain 
the  same  the  organism  will  respond  by  a  series  of  reactions 

1  'Behavior  of  the  Lower  Organisms,'  Columbia  University  Press,  1906,  282-299. 
*  Ibid.,  p.  176. 


102  JOHN  J.  B.  MORGAN 

becoming  more  and  more  pronounced  in  character,  until  by 
one  of  them  it  rids  itself  of  the  stimulation.  The  changes  in 
behavior  may  be  summed  up  as  follows: 

"i.  No  reaction  at  first:  the  organism  continues  its 
normal  activities  for  a  short  time. 

"2.  Then  a  slight  reaction  by  turning  into  a  new  position 
— a  seeming  attempt  to  keep  up  the  normal  activities  and  yet 
get  rid  of  the  stimulation. 

"3.  If  this  is  unsuccessful,  we  have  next  a  slight  interrup- 
tion of  the  normal  activities,  in  a  momentary  reversal  of  the 
ciliary  current,  tending  to  get  rid  of  the  source  of  stimulation. 

"4.  If  the  stimulus  still  persists,  the  animal  breaks  off  its 
normal  activity  completely  by  contracting  strongly — devoting 
itself  entirely,  as  it  were,  to  getting  rid  of  the  stimulation, 
though  retaining  the  possibility  of  resuming  its  normal  ac- 
tivity in  the  same  place  at  any  moment. 

"5.  Finally,  if  all  these  reactions  remain  ineffective,  the 
animal  not  only  gives  up  completely  its  usual  activities,  but 
puts  in  operation  another  set,  having  a  much  more  radical 
effect  in  separating  the  animal  from  the  stimulating  agent. 
It  abandons  its  tube,  swims  away,  and  forms  another  one  in 
a  situation  where  the  stimulus  does  not  act  upon  it." 

This  situation  can  be  clearly  translated  into  the  terms  of 
our  thesis.  The  external  stimulus  was  the  cause  of  the 
reacting  movement;  the  same  external  stimulus  plus  the 
fact  that  the  movement  was  not  effective  in  the  removal  of  the 
stimulus  formed  the  stimulus  for  a  different  movement  until 
finally  the  organism  made  a  very  pronounced  reaction,  in- 
volving its  whole  body,  to  a  stimulus  which  at  first  caused  no 
noticeable  response.  While  the  variation  in  reaction  at  the 
different  stages  is  important  for  psychology  we  are  primarily 
concerned  with  the  fact  that  there  is  an  increasing  intensity 
in  the  responses  until  the  stimulus  is  removed. 

2.  A  simple  illustration  will  show  that  the  same  thing 
is  present  in  animals  of  a  higher  order.  A  child  upon  being 
rebuked  for  pulling  the  cat's  tail  replied  that  he  'was  simply 
holding  and  the  cat  was  doing  the  pulling.'  A  stimulus  upon 
the  cat's  tail  which  at  first  will  cause  only  a  slight  reaction 


AN  ANALYSIS  OF  EFFORT  103 

will  if  that  slight  reaction  fails  to  remove  the  stimulus  give 
place  to  the  most  violent  reactions. 

3.  At  birth  a  child  shows  the  same  reaction.     Nothing 
will  arouse  an  infant  to  struggles  and  cries  of  seeming  rage 
as  quickly  as  holding  its  arms  close  to  its  sides  so  that  it 
cannot  move  them.     The  child  will  resist  movements  of  parts 
of  its  organism  and  will  increase  the  intensity  of  its  resistance 
if  its  first  movements  do  not  serve  to  remove  the  undesirable 
stimulus. 

4.  A  living  muscle  adapts  itself  in  its  contraction  to  the 
resistance  it  meets.     This  fact  has  been  known  for  some  time 
to  physiologists.     Luciani  says;1   "According  to  the  observa- 
tions originally  made  by  Fick,  and  afterwards  confirmed  by 
others,  when  the  weight  applied  to  the  muscle  is  not  great, 
and  particularly  when  an  elastic  resistance  is  opposed  to  the 
muscle,  so  that  its  tension  increases  constantly  during  con- 
traction, the  shortening  is  greater  when  the  weight  and  the 
initial  resistance  are  increased.    This  paradoxical  phenomenon 
is  a  specific  property  of  the  substance  of  living  muscle,  and 
shows  that  the  sudden  pull  of  the  muscle  and  increase  of 
tension  during  shortening  act  as  a  stimulus  on  the  contractile 
substance,  and  increase  the  effect  of  the  electrical  stimulation." 

5.  It  has  been  found  in  experiments  with  human  subjects 
that  the  force  used  in  pulling  a  weight  is  determined  by  the 
magnitude  of  the  load.2     "After  one  has  been  pulling  a  weight 
of  2,440  grams  with  what  he  supposes  to  be  the  maximum 
force  he  is  able  to  exert,  when  unexpectedly  a  weight  of 
7,770  grams  is  substituted  for  the  lighter  one,  his  force  at 
the  very  beginning  of  the  pull  is  on  the  average  2.5  times  as 
great  as  the  supposedly  maximum  force  previously  used." 
The  time  taken  for  this  adjustment  ranges  from  25  sigma  to 
91  sigma  with  an  average  of  54  sigma.     This  is  much  shorter 
than  the  simple  reaction  time,  which  under  the  most  favorable 
circumstances  can  scarcely  be  reduced  to  100  sigma.     Since 

1  'Human  Physiology,'  Trans,  by  F.  A.  Welby,  Macmillan,  Vol.  Ill,  pp.  13,  15, 
and  46.  See  also  'The  Speed  and  Accuracy  of  Motor  Adjustments,'  by  the  writer 
of  this  paper,  Jour,  of  Exper.  Psychol.,  1917,  a,  225,  248. 

1  Morgan,  J.  J.  B.,  'The  Overcoming  of  Distraction  and  Other  Resistances,' 
Archives  of  Psychol.,  1916,  No.  35,  Chap.  VII. 


104  JOHN  J.  B.  MORGAN 

this  adjustment  is  so  rapid  it  cannot  be  a  conscious  reaction. 
It  must  be  a  reflex  or  a  local  muscular  adjustment.  In  either 
case  the  adjustment  is  certainly  elementary. 

6.  In  experiments  on  the  distraction  of  attention  it  has 
been  found  that  individuals  oppose  distractions  with  increased 
effort  as  well  as  by  introducing  other  factors  into  their  work 
which  will  help  them  to  overcome  the  distractions.  These 
adjustments  are  not  made  consciously  but  reflexly;  the  sub- 
jects often  asserting  that  they  do  not  use  the  help  that  their 
reactions  indicate.  For  instance  a  customary  reaction  was 
to  articulate  the  material  used  in  the  process  involved. 
Breathing  records  were  taken  which  indicated  articulation 
and  the  subjects  were  watched  through  a  peep  hole.  Some 
subjects  who  actually  moved  their  lips  in  articulating  denied 
that  they  had  made  any  such  movements.  In  such  a  process 
as  overcoming  distractions  the  exertion  of  effort  is  uncon- 
scious.1 

We  have  seen  that  the  force  exerted  by  an  organism  is  a 
direct  response  to  resistance  encountered.  This  adjustment 
is  seen  in  an  organism  as  elementary  as  the  stentor,  in  higher 
animals,  in  infants  at  birth,  in  a  nerve  muscle  preparation, 
in  muscle  intact  in  the  organism,  and  finally  in  complex 
human  activities  such  as  resisting  distraction.  Using  the 
definition  of  effort  given  above  we  can  say  that  effort  is  an 
immediate  response  to  the  stimulus  of  failure.  Failure  is  used 
to  mean  the  persistence  of  an  unsatisfying  situation  in  spite 
of  the  normal  reaction  to  that  situation. 

Let  us  now  see  whether  complex  types  of  mental  effort 
can  be  analyzed  as  derivatives  of  this  elementary  adjustment. 

EFFORT  IN  PRACTICE 

Let  us  take  first  the  case  of  the  effort  involved  in  long 
continued  practice.  In  periods  where  no  improvement  is 
made  and  a  plateau  appears  in  the  learning  curve,  the  ordinary 
incentives  fall  off  and  subjects  feel  tempted  to  stop.  In  fact 
many  learners  do  stop  at  such  points  and  those  who  persist 
do  so  by  what  they  call  sheer  will  power.  In  this  case  no 

1  Ibid.,  Chaps.  I-VI. 


AN  ANALYSIS  OF  EFFORT  105 

resistance  is  added  but  the  customary  drive  to  activity  dis- 
appears. When  the  man  starts  he  sets  before  himself  the 
goal  of  becoming  proficient  in  the  line  of  work  in  which  he  is 
practicing.  His  rapid  progress  at  first  enthuses  him  and 
stimulates  him  to  work  for  greater  improvement.  When 
improvement  comes  to  a  standstill  doubts  assail  him  as  to 
the  possibility  of  his  ever  becoming  proficient.  His  goal  seems 
to  fade  away  and  he  has  no  motive  to  continue  except  stub- 
born persistence. 

Now  if  an  individual  did  not  have  the  power  of  continuing 
work  in  the  face  of  obstacles  all  work  would  stop  at  such  times. 
The  only  way  in  which  we  could  train  ourselves  to  work  would 
be  to  learn  which  incentives  are  efficacious  and  how  to  keep 
them  before  us.  We  all  need  incentives  to  start  us  on  a  task 
and  we  need  incentives  to  tide  us  over  hard  places;  but  as 
we  grow  older  we  should  need  fewer  and  fewer  incentives, 
we  should  have  developed  this  primitive  trait  of  resisting 
opposition  to  the  point  where  we  can  surmount  an  obstacle 
without  any  outside  aid. 

The  ability  to  surmount  obstacles  is  developed  in  some 
such  way  as  this.  A  young  child  innately  opposes  any 
restraint  upon  its  body  or  any  forced  movement  of  its  mem- 
bers. It  wants  to  be  free  to  move  without  restraint  and 
nothing  will  arouse  a  fighting,  struggling  reaction  as  quickly 
as  pressing  its  arms  to  its  sides  and  holding  them  there. 
As  it  gets  older  and  wants  something  it  will  resist  any  inter- 
ference in  the  way  of  its  obtaining  the  thing  it  wants.  The 
wise  parent  or  teacher  will  not  fight  back  when  the  child 
struggles  for  something,  but  if  it  should  not  have  the  desired 
article  will  substitute  something  else  for  it,  thus  reinforcing 
and  redirecting  rather  than  inhibiting  the  tendency  to  resist 
interference.  Such  training  strengthens  the  capacity  of  the 
child  to  oppose  force  against  resistance.  Finally  the  child 
comes  to  the  point  where  it  should  learn  some  uninteresting 
subject.  Here  the  teacher  presents  proper  incentives,  at- 
taches derived  interests  to  the  work  and  thus  induces  the 
child  to  pursue  the  subject.  The  time  will  come  when  the 
interests  will  fall  off  and  the  child  will  want  to  stop.  The 


106  JOHN  J.  B.  MORGAN 

teacher  will  add  other  incentives,  give  the  child  a  helping 
hand  over  the  hard  place  and  in  so  far  has  trained  him  to 
oppose  force  against  resistance.  If  help  is  not  given  at  the 
proper  time  the  child  may  give  up  and  in  doing  so  has  trained 
himself  to  submit  rather  than  resist. 

It  may  be  thought  that  the  teacher  in  giving  the  extra 
incentives  is  simply  helping  the  child  to  form  a  habit  which 
will  enable  him  to  do  this  particular  task.  This  is  not  the 
case.  The  child's  whole  growth  is  a  struggle  between  the 
tendency  to  continue  a  thing  once  started  and  the  opposition 
of  outer  circumstances  against  continuance.  In  ordinary 
cases  the  tendency  to  increase  effort  with  an  increase  in 
opposition  wins  the  day;  but  when  the  opposition  becomes 
too  great  and  the  child  is  about  to  give  in,  this  is  the  time  the 
teacher  should  give  the  help.  Too  much  help  will  leave  this 
tendency  in  a  dwarfed  state,  too  little  will  train  it  to  retreat 
at  the  slightest  opposition. 

Viewed  in  this  light  punishment  is  not  as  beneficial  a 
factor  in  training  as  rewards.  Punishment  inhibits  a  certain 
response  and  hence  works  against  the  tendency  to  carry 
through  a  thing  once  started.  Rewards  are  a  reinforcement 
to  the  tendency  to  carry  through  a  thing  regardless  of  opposi- 
tion. Punishment  if  given  at  all  should  be  coupled  with 
positive  direction.  Not  only  should  an  act  in  a  specific 
direction  be  inhibited  but  at  the  same  time  a  substitute  should 
be  provided  and  the  offender  encouraged  in  this  alternate  act. 

As  the  child  grows  up  under  such  training  he  is  learning 
to  persist  in  certain  types  of  activity  and  to  give  up  in  other 
lines.  He  has  learned  that  if  he  persists  he  can  overcome 
resistances  and  come  off  victorious.  What  is  there  in  per- 
\sistency  in  practice  more  than  this?  If  there  were  not  an 
original  tendency  to  persist  upon  which  the  teacher  can 
<build  such  training  would  be  impossible;  with  such  a  tendency 
and  proper  training  nothing  else  is  needed.  No  mysterious 
exercise  of  a  subtle  faculty  of  effort  is  needed  to  explain  such 
persistent  practice  on  the  part  of  the  learner  any  more  than 
it  is  necessary  to  say  that  when  the  child  opposes  restriction 
of  its  limbs  it  is  consciously  saying,  "I  will  not  have  this  man 


AN  ANALYSIS  OF  EFFORT  107 

holding  my  hands,  I  will  exercise  my  will  power  and  show 
him  I  will  not  be  thus  dominated."  An  adult  makes  such 
statements  and  thinks  he  is  using  a  special  gift  of  will  power 
when  he  does  so.  If  he  acts  on  his  resolution  he  does  so 
because  he  has  been  schooled  in  using  effort  against  resistance. 
If  he  has  not  so  schooled  himself  his  asseverations  will  be 
as  idle  as  for  a  novice  at  typewriting  to  say,  "I  will  use  this 
machine."  He  can  use  it  if  the  resolution  marks  the  begin- 
ning of  long  practice;  and  a  novice  at  mastering  situations 
can  become  master  if  his  resolution  marks  the  beginning  of 
practice  in  so  doing.  In  both  cases  practice  must  begin  with 
simple  problems.  We  are  all  familiar  with  the  'jack  of  all 
trades,'  the  fellow  who  has  never  learned  to  persist  in  any 
one  trade  long  enough  to  become  master  of  it.  Such  a  man's 
greatest  lack  lies  not  in  the  fact  that  he  has  not  mastered 
a  trade  but  that  he  has  never  schooled  himself  in  the  meeting 
of  obstacles  by  persistence  in  some  one  trade.  He  has  started 
a  dozen  and  continued  until  he  struck  a  'snag'  and  then 
stopped. 

EFFORT  IN  ATTENTION 

Spontaneous  attention  is  based  upon  the  reflex  response 
of  an  individual  to  an  adequate  stimulus.  If  the  stimulus 
causes  a  response  without  involving  conscious  control  it  is 
a  simple  reflex,  if  the  individual  is  vividly  conscious  of  the 
response  we  say  that  he  attends  to  it.  If  the  first  response 
is  followed  by  successive  responses  to  other  details  of  the 
same  object  we  have  continued  involuntary  attention.  An 
object  which  is  able  to  cause  a  series  of  responses  to  its 
different  details  is  said  to  be  interesting  to  the  individual. 
Attention  to  such  objects  involves  no  effort,  it  is  a  native 
response.  It  is  necessary  in  order  for  one  to  get  a  proper 
course  of  training  to  fit  him  for  modern  social  life  to  attend 
to  a  number  of  things  which  are  not  naturally  interesting, 
to  objects  to  which  he  would  not  naturally  attend.  One 
does  this  at  first  by  attaching  some  outside  interest  to  the 
object.  The  drive  from  this  outside  interest  makes  us  attend 
to  otherwise  uninteresting  objects  and  we  still  are  exerting 
no  effort  to  do  so.  At  times,  however,  the  derived  interests 


io8  JOHN  J.  B.  MORGAN 

lose  their  potency,  objects  assail  our  senses  which  have  more 
interest  for  us  than  the  objects  to  which  we  should  attend, 
and  we  do  attend  to  them  only  by  intense  effort  to  do  so. 
Here  the  effort  takes  the  form  of  reinforcing  the  desired 
subject  and  inhibiting  irrelevant  subjects.  Ability  to  exert 
oneself  in  this  way  is  only  acquired  after  practice.  One 
cannot  natively  inhibit  irrevelant  stimuli  which  interest  him. 
A  child's  attention  will  waver  from  one  subject  to  another, 
and  at  the  instant  you  think  the  child  is  listening  to  what 
you  are  saying  he  will  break  out  with  the  remark,  "Daddy, 
what  is  in  your  pocket?"  A  feeble-minded  individual  who 
has  never  been  trained  to  resist  irrelevant  stimuli  shows  the 
same  lack  of  control.  Now  if  an  individual  did  not  have  a 
tendency  to  oppose  effort  against  distractions  he  would  never 
learn  to  do  so.  All  through  life  it  would  be  absolutely  neces- 
sary to  attend  to  the  most  interesting  thing  and  the  only  way 
to  keep  one's  attention  on  a  subject  would  be  to  make  it 
more  interesting  than  the  distractions.  When  one  starts  to 
master  a  lesson  the  primitive  tendency  to  persist  in  a  line  of 
activity  once  started  comes  in  to  dispel  irrelevant  distractions. 
When  the  distractions  become  too  strong  one  can  either 
remove  them  or  add  extra  derived  interests  to  his  task  to 
'boost'  him  over  the  hard  place.  Each  time  he  succeeds  in 
dispelling  a  strong  distraction  it  is  easier  for  him  to  do  the 
same  thing  the  next  time.  He  learns  tricks  to  help  him  do 
so,  such  as  straining  his  muscles,  articulating  words,  etc. 
He  uses  these  aids  to  help  him  over  the  difficult  places  but  in 
so  far  as  he  is  holding  his  attention  by  sheer  force  he  is  using 
a  modification  of  the  inherent  characteristic  of  all  organisms 
to  oppose  disturbances  by  increased  effort. 

OPPOSITION  TO  INNATE  TENDENCIES  OR  LEARNED  HABITS 
A  man  may  awaken  to  the  fact  that  he  has  an  irresistable 
tendency  to  do  some  thing  which  is  contrary  to  the  moral 
codes  of  the  society  in  which  he  is  living  or  the  doing  of  which 
would  result  in  injury  to  himself.  This  tendency  may  be 
due  to  inheritance  or  due  to  some  habit  he  has  formed,  the  end 
result  is  the  same.  His  whole  organism  impels  him  to  do 


AN  ANALYSIS  OF  EFFORT  109 

the  act,  the  system  of  forces  of  which  he  is  composed  is 
horribly  unbalanced,  all  the  weight  is  in  favor  of  the  act  that 
would  harm  him;  still  he  knows  that  if  he  does  it  he  will 
receive  the  unanimous  condemnation  of  his  fellows  or  will 
suffer  in  some  other  way.  If  the  realization  of  the  conse- 
quences is  vivid  enough  the  tendency  to  do  the  act  will  be 
counterbalanced  and  the  man  will  refrain.  This  is  the  usual 
type  of  activity  in  so-called  moral  decisions,  when  the  indi- 
vidual is  combating  an  inherent  desire  to  do  something  or  is 
fighting  a  habit  he  has  learned.  Victory  comes  without 
display  of  effort  by  making  the  consequences  so  forceful  as  to 
inhibit  the  performance  of  the  act.  In  some  cases  however 
when  some  specific  temptation  comes  the  individual  loses 
sight  of  the  consequences,  he  believes  he  will  not  be  caught, 
his  organism  and  the  outer  stimuli  affecting  it  all  urge  him 
to  gratify  his  impulse.  He  feels  that  he  will  gain  nothing 
by  resisting  except  the  maintenance  of  the  integrity  of  his 
character.  It  is  a  battle  royal  with  the  odds  greatly  against 
the  man  and  only  the  exceptional  man  will  win.  When  the 
victory  is  won  the  victor  feels  that  it  was  only  through  the 
greatest  effort  of  his  will-power.  Such  a  man  is  the  heroic 
type  of  which  novelists  write  and  poets  sing.  He  is  the  ideal 
to  set  before  the  young,  he  is  the  standard  by  which  we 
measure  ourselves.  How  did  he  get  the  ability  to  display 
such  force — to  resist  when  all  help  had  deserted  him?  Such 
a  victory  would  never  be  won  by  a  man  who  had  never  been 
schooled  for  the  battle.  The  teacher  of  morality  takes  great 
pains  to  see  that  the  child  is  given  a  proper  chance  to  show 
its  resistance  to  temptation  but  is  also  careful  to  help  it 
across  the  hard  place.  No  one  would  expect  a  child  to  fight 
a  difficult  moral  battle,  one  never  blames  the  child  if  it 
fails  but  blames  the  elders  for  their  lack  in  properly  guiding 
and  helping  the  child.  The  adult  who  is  weak  morally  is  the 
one  who  has  been  so  shielded  that  he  never  has  had  to  fight 
a  battle,  or  the  one  who  was  never  helped  so  that  he  never 
won  one.  If  there  were  no  innate  tendency  to  meet  opposi- 
tion with  increased  effort  it  could  never  be  developed. 


no  JOHN  J.  B.  MORGAN 

SUMMARY 

Every  organism  tends  to  maintain  its  integrity  in  the 
face  of  situations  which  would  destroy  it.  Whether  one 
explains  the  facts  of  the  struggle  which  ensues  from  this 
state  of  affairs  by  reference  to  the  concept  of  will  or  by 
reference  to  a  tendency  which  developed  through  an  evolu- 
tionary process,  the  nature  of  the  struggle  which  the  organism 
must  put  forth  remains  unexplained.  Attempts  to  resolve 
all  response  into  terms  of  stimuli  must  account  for  a  variation 
in  response  with  the  same  objective  stimulus.  This  account 
has  been  made  by  reference  to  the  physiological  condition 
of  the  organism  on  the  theory  that  every  stimulus,  besides 
the  direct  discharge  which  it  causes,  diffuses  energy  through- 
out the  organism  and  leaves  it  in  a  different  condition.  This 
difference  in  condition  results  in  the  second  response  to  the 
same  objective  stimulus  being  different  from  the  first.  What 
is  meant  by  physiological  condition  (or  the  correlative  psycho- 
logical term  dynamogenesis)  needs  to  be  more  carefully 
defined  and  this  paper  is  an  attempt  to  define  one  phase  of 
this  explanation. 

The  thesis  of  this  paper  is  that  effort  in  the  sense  of  a 
tendency  to  oppose  any  stimulus  which  would  destroy  the 
integrity  of  the  organism  is  a  reflex  response.  Given  an 
inimical  stimulus  plus  the  failure  of  the  normal  response 
of  the  organism  to  that  stimulus  to  remove  it,  an  increased 
effort  will  result. 

The  paper  proceeds  on  the  assumption  that  the  reason  for 
the  presence  of  any  trait  can  be  referred  to  biological  varia- 
tion and  selection,  the  thing  which  is  required  is  to  show  that 
the  trait  exists  at  various  stages  of  organic  life  and  that 
complex  manifestations  Can  be  referred  to  the  elementary 
forms  and  explained  as  developments  from  them. 

Following  this  line  of  reasoning  it  is  shown  that  the  in- 
crease of  effort  to  the  stimulus  of  failure  appears  in  an  organ- 
ism as  elementary  as  the  stentor,  in  higher  animals,  in  infants 
at  birth,  in  a  nerve  muscle  preparation,  in  muscles  intact  in 
the  organism,  and  finally  in  complex  human  activities  such 
as  resisting  distraction.  From  these  facts  the  conclusion  is 


AN  ANALYSIS  OF  EFFORT  "« 

drawn  that  effort  is  an  immediate  response  to  the  stimulus 
of  failure. 

The  exhibitions  of  effort  in  such  complex  mental  processes 
as  solving  novel  problems,  persisting  in  practice,  effort  in 
attention  and  in  moral  conflicts  are  then  traced  as  develop- 
ments of  the  reflex  tendency  present  at  birth  to  oppose  re- 
sistance to  free  activity. 

Much  work  has  been  done  in  determining  the  laws  of 
retention  and  reproduction  because  it  was  felt  inadequate  to 
explain  present  activity  by  a  general  reference  to  past  im- 
pressions. Just  so,  psychology  cannot  rest  with  the  explana- 
tion that  the  response  depends  upon  the  physiological  state 
of  the  organism.  The  physiological  state  (set  of  the  organ- 
ism, directions  received,  or  any  other  term  which  may  be 
used)  certainly  depends  upon  certain  laws  which  are  discover- 
able through  proper  research.  This  paper  in  an  attempt  to 
formulate  one  of  these  laws. 


A   COMPARISON  OF   COMPLETE  VERSUS  ALTER- 
NATE METHODS  OF  LEARNING  TWO 
HABITS. 

BY  J.  F.  DASHIELL 

The  University  of  North  Carolina1 

In  the  main,  the  study  of  habit  formation  has  been  limited 
to  the  study  of  one  or  another  single  kind  of  habit.  True, 
in  human  psychology  interest  has  widened  from  a  technical 
study  of  a  single  learning  process  to  include  the  investigation 
of  two  or  more,  and  in  animal  psychology  a  few  isolated 
researches  have  been  devoted  to  one  aspect  of  the  matter; 
but  the  early  researches  upon  the  interference  between  habits 
and  the  more  extensive  studies  of  the  problems  of  transfer  of 
training  seem  not  to  have  stimulated  much  activity  along 
still  other  lines  of  possible  investigation  in  the  matter  of  the 
development  of  more  than  one  habit.  Putting  it  very  gener- 
ally, one  might  divide  the  past  lines  of  interest  in  multiple 
habit  formation  into  (i)  the  investigation  of  the  relations 
between  one  process  of  learning  and  a  simultaneous  process 
of  learning,  and  (2)  that  of  the  relations  between  earlier  and 
later  learnings  (of  different  problems).  The  former  interest 
has  been  little  shown  in  animal  psychology,  and  in  human 
psychology  only  after  the  latter  interest  has  been  rather 
exhaustively  handled.  The  latter  embraces  well-known 
questions  as  to  the  transfer  of  training. 

The  work  here  to  be  reported  was  a  preliminary  com- 
parison between  the  practice  methods  referred  to  in  (i)  and 
in  (2)  above.  For  a  subject  that  is  to  learn  two  different 
habits  is  it  more  economical  to  practice  on  them  both  at  the 
same  time  as  nearly  as  may  be,  thus  learning  them  together 
or  'alongside'  each  other,  or  to  practice  on  one  only  after 
the  other  has  been  completely  learned  by  itself?  To  approach 
a  reliable  answer  to  this  rather  general  question  different 

1  The  experimental  work  was  done  in  the  Oberlin  College  Laboratory. 
112 


"3 

types  of  subjects  and  of  habits  were  used.     This  paper  will 
summarize  these  separate  studies  under  the  headings: 

I.  Maze  Running  by  Rats; 
II.  Maze  Running  by  Children; 

III.  Maze  Running  by  Adults; 

IV.  Card  Sorting  by  Adults; 
V.  Adding  by  Adults. 

While  this  research  was  in  progress  Pyle's  brief  article 
appeared1  in  which  he  shows  that  experiments  in  card  distri- 
bution lead  to  the  inference  "that  it  is  not  economical  to 
form  at  the  same  time  two  mutually  inhibitory  sets  of  habits. 
The  better  procedure  is  to  form  one,  and  then  the  other." 
The  present  study  may  then  be  taken  as  a  research  similar 
to  Pyle's  but  extended  over  a  wider  range  of  habits. 

I.  MAZE  RUNNING  BY  RATS 

Nothing,  so  far  as  the  writer  is  aware,  has  be'eV  done  with 
animals  on  the  question  as  to  the  relative  economy  of  Com- 
plete and  Alternate  methods  in  double  habit  formation. 

The  general  method  used  by  the  writer  embraced  two 
procedures:  (i)  that  of  training  one  group  of  white  rats  in  a 
single  maze  R,  and  when  that  was  completely  learned  in  a 
second  maze  Z,;  (2)  that  of  training  a  second  group  of  rats  in 
the  same  R  and  L  mazes  alternately,  e.g.,  if  maze  R  be  used 
on  Monday,  Wednesday,  Friday,  and  Sunday  of  a  given  week, 
maze  L  was  used  on  Tuesday,  Thursday,  Saturday,  and  the 
next  Monday.  The  first  method  of  training  will  be  called 
"Complete,"  the  second,  "Alternate."  As  implied,  single 
daily  trials  were  set.  The  animals  had  been  previously 
accustomed  to  a  feeding  at  4:30  P.M.,  the  hour  adopted  for 
the  experiments,  and  for  a  few  days  before  the  beginning  of 
the  experiment  were  fed  in  the  food  box  to  be  connected  with 
the  maze.  Uniformity  of  hunger  conditions  from  day  to 
day  were  obtained  by  letting  the  animals  feed  as  long  as  they 
would  (less  than  half  an  hour)  after  each  day's  run,  then 
removing  them  to  the  nest  box  where  they  had  no  food  until 
the  next  run,  twenty  four  hours  later. 

1 W.  H.  Pyle,  'Transfer  and  Interference  in  Card-Distributing,'  Journal  of  Edu- 
cational Psychology,  1919,  10,  107-110. 


H4  J-  F.  DASHIELL 

The  mazes  were  of  cork-composition  flooring,  galvanized 
iron  partitions,  and  glass  tops;  and  all  runways  and  alleys 
were  4  inches  in  height  by  4  inches  in  width.  The  entrances 
were  closed  behind  the  animals  by  raising  a  galvanized  iron 
piece  hinged  at  the  floor.1 

The  particular  patterns  of  mazes  used  are  shown  in  Fig.  I. 
They  were  exactly  inverse  to  each  other.  It  was  believed 


FIG.  i. 

that  the  identity  of  pattern  when  inverted  would  be  unim- 
portant to  the  animal  subject,  and  it  had  the  advantage  of 
making  the  mazes  equivalent  in  difficulty.  It  will  be  ob- 
served incidentally  that  the  eight  culs-de-sac  furnished  a 
variety  in  position  (a)  with  reference  to  runway,  and  (&)  with 
reference  to  each  other.  As  preliminary  to  further  studies 
into  the  respective  influence  of  different  sorts  of  culs-de-sac 
notes  were  taken  regarding  the  functioning  of  these  in  this 
experiment,  but  the  data  will  not  be  presented  in  this  place. 
In  order  to  provide  as  complete  controls  as  possible  a 
single  litter  of  white  rats  was  used,  one  half  of  the  litter 
serving  as  the  controls  for  the  other  half.  This  necessarily 
made  the  number  of  subjects  small,  six  being  used,  three  in 
each  group.  They  were  exactly  eight  weeks  old  at  the  be- 
ginning of  the  experiments. 

1  For  details  of  construction  of  these  and  other  mazes  in  the  Oberlin  laboratory 
see  Psychol.  Bull.,  1919,  16,  223-230. 


METHODS  OF  LEARNING   TWO  IL 4 BITS 


The  data  obtained  for  both  groups  in  time  consumed  and 
errors  made  for  the  various  runs  are  given  graphically  in 
Fig.  2.  The  28th  trial  marks  the  first  practice  by  the  Com- 


plete  group   (group  learning  by  the  Complete  method)   in 
maze  L. 


n6  J.  F.  DASHIELL 

Comparison  of  the  numerical  records  ,of  the  two  groups 
would  show  little  difference  between  the  methods  of  Com- 
plete and  of  Alternate  learning  in  regard  to  total  number  of 
trials  required.  The  Complete  group  shows  respectively, 
37,  37,  and  36  trials  (total,  no);  the  Alternate  group,  30, 
49  +,  and  32  (total,  in  +). 

As  to  type  of  curve  it  is  to  be  said  that  not  as  much  dif- 
ference was  found  as  would  perhaps  have  been  expected. 
The  curves  for  the  subjects  learning  the  R  maze  Completely 
before  being  given  the  L  maze  conform  in  a  general  way  to 
the  type  found  in  numerous  experiments  with  a  single  maze, 
if  we  take  them  as  far  as  the  twentieth  trial.  The  only 
unusual  feature  is  the  highly  increased  time  and  errors  at 
the  twelfth  trial — attributable  to  rat  C's  relapse  alone. 
In  the  twenty-first  to  twenty-fourth  trials  the  slight  rise  of 
curves  is  due  to  the  fact  that  rat  /,  having  learned  maze  R, 
was  resting,  and  the  average  represents  only  the  achievements 
of  the  other  two  rats.  The  twenty-eighth  trial  was  the  first 
one  on  the  new  maze  L,  and  the  curves  are  accordingly  high. 
That  they  are  not  decidedly  higher  is  evidence  of  the  transfer 
generally  found  in  the  learning  of  one  habit  just  after  the 
learning  of  a  somewhat  similar  one.  The  average  time  taken 
for  the  first  trial  in  maze  L  is  not  as  great  as  that  for  the 
eighth  trial  in  the  previous  maze  jR;  the  average  number  of 
errors  in  the  first  trial  in  L  is  only  slightly  greater  than  that 
for  the  fifth  in  R.  To  what  extent  were  transferred  factors 
operating  and  to  what  extent  was  there  interference?  The 
former  seem  to  have  been  more  in  evidence  than  the  latter. 
Apparently,  the  need  is  here  indicated  for  a  careful  analysis 
of  the  degrees  and  sorts  of  transfer  of  different  features  of 
the  whole  maze  learning  procedure. 

For  the  Alternating  group  the  time  curve  shows  again  the 
general  form  of  the  learning  curve  for  the  white  rat  in  the 
maze  problem.  The  error  curve  is  to  a  lesser  degree  of  that 
type.  As  is  to  be  expected,  these  curves  for  learning  Alter- 
nately two  mazes  show  poorer  records  than  do  those  for  rats 
learning  the  R  maze  only,  i.e.,  longer  times  and  more  errors. 
This  difference  in  amounts  of  scores  made,  however,  is  not 
very  great. 


METHODS  OF  LEARNING  TWO  HABITS  n7 

A  feature  that  appears  more  definitely  is  the  difference  in 
regularity  and  irregularity  in  the  curves  for  the  two  groups  of 
rats.  It  is  especially  evident  in  comparing  the  performances 
in  trials  2  to  20  inclusive.  The  curves  for  the  Complete 
group  are  fairly  regular  and  smooth,  those  for  the  Alternating 
group  decidedly  more  irregular,  and  the  time  curve  so  through- 
out its  length.  That  this  feature  was  not  due  to  a  difference 
in  difficulty  in  the  two  mazes  in  alternate  use  is  shown  by  the 
fact  that  the  changes  are  not  in  the  form  of  a  regular  alter- 
nation between  better  and  poorer  scores.  Consider  such 
successive  changes  as  in  trials  5-6-7-8,  in  9-10-11,  in  18-19- 
20,  or  in  23-24-25-26.  To  obtain  a  more  definite  statement 
of  the  differences  in  amount  of  regularity  in  the  work  of  the 
two  groups  the  writer  hit  upon  the  following  method:1 

(a)  finding  the  amount  of  improvement  or  loss  between  each 
two  successive  trials  for  each  animal  in  time  and  in  errors; 

(b)  summing  all  changes  of  both  sorts  (both  gains  and  losses) 
for  each  animal;  (c)  averaging  these  totals  for  each  group; 
(d)  determining  the  average  number  of  trials  taken  in  each 
group;  (e)  writing  the  number  obtained  by  (c)  over  that 
obtained  by  (d),  to  express  the  group  average  of  changes 
between  each  two  successive  runs.     (The  same  method  can, 
of  course,  be  adapted  for  application  to  individuals.)     Let 
us  call  this  the  "  Index  of  Irregularity."     The  relation  between 
the  two  groups  may  then  be  exhibited  in  the  form  of  a  fraction 
or  a  ratio  between  the  two  indexes  of  irregularity.     In  this 
way  the  Alternate  group  shows  the  greater  irregularity  in 
reduction  of  time  consumed  by  the  ratio  24.51:  21.58.     The 
same  group   shows   a  very  slightly  greater  irregularity  in 
elimination  of  errors,  3.48:  3.41. 

The  writer  cannot  refrain  from  remarking  that  had  the 
first  trial  of  subject  /  of  the  Complete  group  been  not  so 
disproportionately  great  in  time  and  errors,  the  differences 

1  Application  of  the  method  of  average  of  deviations  from  the  average  of  per- 
formance for  each  group  (the  well  known  "A.  D.")  was  tried  and  discarded  at  once — 
the  two  groups  gave  the  same  A.D.  for  errors,  4.32.  The  large  difference  in  the  initial 
trials  of  the  two  groups  (time  and  errors  for  Alternate  group  being  233.0  and  14.3  to 
365.6  and  23.6  for  the  Direct  group)  is  enough  to  offset  a  very  large  amount  of  greater 
irregularity  by  the  Alternate  group,  if  the  ordinary  A.D.  be  the  measure  used. 


ii&  /.  F.  DASH  I  ELL 

between  the  two  groups  would  have  been  materially  increased. 
Time  on  first  trial  for  each  subject  of  the  Alternate  group 
was  -£-92,  !T-4O2,  ^-205;  for  subjects  of  the  Complete  group, 
H-ioSj  7-845,  C-I44;  errors  on  first  trial  for  Alternate 
group  were  £-8,  T-if,  ^-18;  for  the  Complete  group, 

#-9,  J-54,  C-8. 

We  would  seem  to  be  warranted  in  concluding  that  for 
white  rats  learning  two  different  mazes  with  one  run  daily, 
it  is  more  economical  to  practice  one  Completely,  then  the 
other,  than  to  run  them  Alternately.  This  greater  economy 
is  shown  in  the  form  of  a  greater  regularity  of  performance. 
As  to  a  difference  in  total  number  of  trials  required  by  the 
two  methods  the  data  are  not  conclusive. 

II.  MAZE  RUNNING  BY  CHILDREN 

Surely  one  important  justification  and  raison  d'etre  of 
the  science  of  animal  psychology  is  to  be  found  in  the  possi- 
bility that  principles  and  laws  empirically  arrived  at  in  this 
field  may  be  found  applicable  in  some  degree  to  human  psy- 
chology and  education — fields  more  complex  and  difficult  of 
experimental  as  well  as  theoretical  analysis.  It  may  be 
safely  stated  in  this  connection  that  such  application  from 
one  department  of  psychology  to  another  will  be  the  more 
warrantable  as  the  materials  and  methods  involved  in  the 
two  cases  are  the  more  nearly  identical.  It  was  in  accordance 
with  this  principle  that  the  author  made  a  study  of  maze 
learning  by  young  children. 

The  eight  children  used  were  attending  a  kindergarten 
and  were  in  their  fifth  or  sixth  years  (four  or  five  years  old). 
In  this  experiment  it  was  necessary  because  of  lateness  in 
the  school  year  to  have  the  child  make  two  runs  daily  about 
twenty  minutes  apart. 

The  material  used  was  a  multiple  unit  set  of  screens 
4  feet  by  3  feet  hooked  end  to  end  to  form  the  partitions,1 
and  was  set  up  indoors  on  the  floor  of  a  large  room.  To 
serve  as  incentive,  silk  flags  on  a  small  upright  stand  were 
shown  the  children  and  then  'hidden  somewhere  inside/ 

1  Described  elsewhere,  cf.  supra,  note  p.  114. 


METHODS  OF  LEARNING   TWO  HABITS 


119 


and  the  children  were  sent  in  to  find  them.  This  artificial 
incentive  quickly  gave  place  to  the  *  problem  solving'  interest 
which  persisted  throughout  in  good  strength. 

On  account  of  the  limited  floor  space  available  it  was 
impracticable  to  have  two  entirely  separate  mazes  erected; 
and  the  same  condition  necessitated  the  employment  of  a 
simpler  pattern  than  the  two  used  for  the  rats.  Figure  3 


K 

FIG.  3. 

shows  the  ground  plan  of  the  kindergarten  maze.  As  one 
problem  the  subjects  learned  to  run  this  maze  forward,  in 
direction  indicated  by  arrow  heads  and  passing  culs-de-sac 
in  alphabetical  order  (called  problem  F);  the  other  problem 
consisted  in  learning  the  reverse  path,  passing  the  culs-de-sac 
in  the  order  F-E-D-C-B-A  (called  problem  B).  Similarly 
to  the  plan  employed  with  the  rats,  the  method  here  used 
was  to  have  one  group  of  children  practice  problem  F  only 
until  learned  Complete  (indicated  by  three  successive  error- 
less runs),  then  the  problem  B  only;  and  to  have  the  other 
group  practice  Alternately  on  the  two  problems,  taking 
problem  F  first  on  each  day  and  B  second. 

The  data  obtained  for  both  groups  in  errors  and  in  time 
consumed  for  the  runs  are  plotted  graphically  in  Fig.  4. 
The  seventeenth  trial  marks  the  first  practice  by  the  Complete 
group  upon  the  problem  /?,  the  subjects  who  had  learned 
problem  F  earlier  continuing  to  run  on  it  until  this  trial. 


120 


/.  F.  DASHIELL 


Comparison  of  the  numerical  records  of  the  two  groups 
would  show  some  slight  advantage  for  the  Complete  method 
in  so  far  as  the  number  of  trials  required  is  the  criterion,  the 


children  learning  by  this  method  requiring  respectively 
33,  32,  28,  and  23  trials  as  against  34,  37,  30,  and  35  +  trials 
for  the  other  group. 


METHODS  OF  LEARNING  TWO  HABITS  I" 

The  type  of  curve  is  again  of  the  well-known  negative 
acceleration  kind  for  both  groups. 

The  feature  that  again  strikes  the  eye  is  the  difference  in 
regularity  or  irregularity  in  the  curves  for  the  two  groups  of 
subjects.  Using  the  fraction  described  above  in  connection 
with  work  with  rats,  it  is  found  that  the  respective  "indexes 
of  irregularity"  compare  as  follows:  the  Alternating  group 
again  shows  greater  irregularity  over  the  Complete  group 
in  the  reduction  of  time  consumed  by  the  ratio,  6.62:  3.63; 
the  same  group  shows  a  greater  irregularity  in  elimination  of 
errors,  by  the  ratio,  7.00  :  3.44. 

Another  difference  between  the  work  of  the  two  groups 
is  to  be  found  in  the  amount  of  errors  and  time  shown  for 
single  trials.  Consider  especially  the  differences  in  errors  in 
the  trials  numbered  2  to  8,  n  to  15,  22  to  26,  28  to  32,  and 
the  differences  in  time  in  trials  numbered  2  to  4,  6  to  16, 
1 8  to  20.  The  group  learning  by  the  Complete  method 
showed  fewer  average  errors  in  25  out  of  32  trials  and  shorter 
average  time  in  22  out  of  32  trials. 

III.  MAZE  RUNNING  BY  ADULTS 

Another  approach  to  the  general  problem  of  the  research 
was  made  by  using  adult  human  subjects  with  pencil  mazes, 
and  with  a  somewhat  different  program. 

Four  students  of  college  grade  in  a  summer  session  were 
enlisted  as  subjects.  They  will  be  denoted  by  initials, 
H,  K,  B,  and  W. 

The  mazes  were  constructed  as  follows:  the  design  of 
each  maze  (see  Fig.  5)  was  laid  out  on  cardboard  and  then 
with  a  narrow  band  saw  cut  out  of  *  beaver  board.'  This  was 
given  two  coats  of  shellac  to  produce  sufficient  hardness  and 
smoothness  of  edges.  The  *  beaver  board'  was  nailed  firmly 
over  a  piece  of  cardboard  placed  upon  a  wooden  base.  The 
runways  were  */4  inc^  wide  and  */4  inch  deep,  and  had  the 
smooth  cardboard  for  their  floor.  Two  of  the  mazes  (S  and  s) 
were  designed  on  a  rectangular  and  straight  line  plan,  to 
make  a  suitable  problem  for  the  development  of  two  habits, 
and  were  respectively  8  X  91/*  inches  and  83/4  X  91/*  inches 


122 


J.  F.  DASHIELL 


in 


outside  dimensions.  The  other  two  (R  and  r)  were 
designed  on  lines  similar  to  one  another  but  quite  distinguish- 
able from  the  first  two:  they  were  of  circular  outside  plan 
with  radius  of  4:/s  inches,  and  the  runways  were  arcs  of  the 
same  curvature.  A  stylus  was  fashioned  by  rounding  the 
end  of  a  3/i6-inch  round  brass  rod,  6  inches  long.  A  rubber 


band  was  wound  around  the  stylus  2  inches  from  the  lower 
end.  The  stylus  moved  easily  in  the  runways  when  held 
vertical,  but  was  of  sufficient  diameter  to  prevent  too  great 
looseness  and  loss  of  contact  with  sides  of  runways. 

The  program  of  the  experiments  was  arranged  so  that 
each  subject  might  serve  as  his  own  control,  by  having  him 
learn  one  pair  of  mazes  by  the  Alternate  method,  the  other 


METHODS  OF  LEARNING   1'WO  HABITS  1*3 

pair  by  the  Complete  method.  Instead  of  the  trials  being 
distributed  over  a  long  series  of  days,  as  had  been  done  with 
children  and  especially  with  rats,  the  maximum  of  40  trials 
allowed  to  each  problem  was  given  all  at  one  sitting  (of  45 
to  60  minutes).  The  order  of  use  of  the  two  pairs  of  mazes, 
and  the  order  of  use  of  the  two  methods  was  varied,  as  seen 
in  Table  I. 

TABLE  I 

SHOWING  PROGRAM  OF  SITTINGS 

Subject                                             Tuesday  Thursday 

H Mazes  R  and  r,  Complete  method  Mazes  S  and  /,  Alternate  method 

K Mazes  R  and  r,  Alternate  method  Mazes  S  and  j,  Complete  method 

B Mazes  S  and  j,  Complete  method  Mazes  R  and  r,  Alternate  method 

W Mazes  S  and  /,  Alternate  method  Mazes  R  and  r,  Complete  method 

The  subjects  were  uninformed  throughout  as  to  the  object 
and  the  exact  methods  of  the  experiment  and  as  to  the  order 
in  which  the  mazes  were  to  be  used.  After  every  trial  the 
experimenter  removed  the  maze  and  made  a  "business  as  of 
changing  mazes"  before  placing  maze  for  the  next  trial. 
This  procedure  was  followed  whether  the  same  or  the  alternate 
maze  was  to  be  used.  Remarks  or  questions  by  the  subjects 
as  to  the  apparent  sameness  or  difference  of  mazes  used  in 
successive  trials  were  not  answered.  Thus  in  addition  to 
learning  mazes  in  the  usual  sense  the  subject  had  to  discover 
inductively  their  number  and  the  order  in  which  they  were 
set.  (As  mentioned  above,  the  entrance  paths  to  all  mazes 
were  different — to  furnish  a  clue  at  the  beginning  of  each 
run  that  could  sooner  or  later  become  definitely  recognized 
and  used.)  In  operation  this  was  found  to  have  consider- 
ably increased  the  difficulty  of  the  learning  and  to  have 
introduced  important  ideational  elements  that  may  be  par- 
tially responsible  for  the  minor  differences  in  results  between 
this  and  preceding  parts  of  this  research. 

For  the  experiment  the  subject  was  seated  at  a  table  upon 
which  the  maze  was  placed,  with  a  screen  fixed  above  it  to 
shut  off  vision  of  it.  The  instructions  given  the  subject 
were  as  follows:  "You  are  to  take  this  brass  stylus  (shown) 
in  your  fingers  much  as  you  would  a  pencil,  but  holding  it 


I24 


/.  F.  DASHIELL 


r  i 


+OT 


S     10    IS   VO    Z5   30    35    10 


5     /O    IS    20   25   JO    JS    40 


METHODS  OF  LEARNING  TWO  HABITS  125 

vertical.  Do  not  place  fingers  below  the  rubber  band. 
As  you  hold  it  I  will  insert  the  point  at  the  beginning  of  a 
groove  cut  in  a  wooden  floor,  which  you  are  not  to  see.  You 
are  then  to  move  the  stylus  within  this  groove  until  you  reach 
a  point  at  which  I  say,  'Stop!'  Time  will  be  taken  for  the 
trial  but  you  are  not  to  feel  hurried.  Three  points  are  to  be 
remembered:  Do  not  lift  the  point  of  the  stylus  from  the 
floor  of  the  groove;  always  keep  the  stylus  in  strictly  vertical 
position,  never  let  it  slant;  never  let  your  fingers  or  any  part 
of  the  hand  touch  the  floor."  In  actual  operation  the 
subject's  stylus  upon  reaching  the  exit  went  down  off  the 
edge  of  the  one  inch  base  board. 

The  results  of  this  experiment  are  best  presented  graphi- 
cally in  Fig.  6.  Only  curves  for  the  errors  are  shown.  The 
time  and  error  curves  were  in  every  case  practically  identical, 
as  the  human  subjects  did  not  show  the  rapid  pick-up  of 
speed  shown  by  the  rats,  i.e.,  a  relatively  greater  elimination 
of  surplus  time  than  of  errors.  It  will  be  seen  that  with  the 
subjects  practicing  by  the  Complete  method  first  (H  and  B) 
a  great  loss  of  time  and  a  great  number  of  errors  accompanied 
the  first  runs  on  each  maze  learned  by  this  method.  The 
slightly  better  performance  by  these  same  subjects  when 
using  the  Alternate  method  later  is,  however,  possible  of 
interpretation  in  terms  of  practice — practice  on  the  first  two 
mazes  being  advantageous  for  practice  on  the  later  two, 
being  an  evident  case  of  transfer  at  least  of  the  more  general 
elements  in  the  learning  situation.  This  is  confirmed  by 
inspecting  the  curves  for  K  and  Wy  who  used  the  Alternate 
method  first.  In  both  of  these  subjects  the  improvement  in 
learning  two  mazes  Alternately  is  slow  and,  what  is  most 

TABLE  II 

SHOWING  INDEXES  OF  IRREGULARITY  IN  ELIMINATION  OF  ERRORS 
Using  C.  Method  First: 

By  C.  Method  By  A.  Method 

2.25 
2.00 

4-25 

11.37 
5-35 
l6.7i 


H  

1  ^' 

B  

4  16 

Using  A.  Method  First: 
K  

7/fi 
.  .  1  .01 

W  

.  .  1.42 

2.4S 

126  y.  f,  DASH  I  ELL 

striking,  very  irregular.  Remembering  its  limitations,  we 
may  again  employ  our  index  of  irregularity  to  bring  out  the 
last  point.  See  Table  II.  It  is  also  instructive  to  note  how 
rapidly  the  second  habit  by  the  Complete  method  was 
learned,  in  all  cases. 

IV.  CARD  SORTING  BY  ADULTS 

So  far  the  question  as  to  the  relative  efficiency  of  Complete 
and  of  Alternate  methods  in  practicing  two  habits  has  been 
studied  in  connection  with  maze  learning.  Certain  general 
principles  have  been  found  to  hold  for  maze  habits  for 
different  kinds  of  subjects  with  different  kinds  of  maze 
materials.  The  question  arises,  can  the  findings  be  demon- 
strated for  other  sorts  of  habits?  Since  the  running  of 
a  labyrinth  is  a  typical  sensori-motor  or  perceptual-motor 
habit,  it  occurred  to  the  experimenter  that  it  might  be 
enlightening  to  apply  the  same  methods  of  approach  to 
some  other  style  of  perceptual-motor  habit.  The  one  chosen, 
card  sorting,  possessed  the  advantage  of  being  a  familiar 
one  in  psychological  literature,  having  been  already  studied 
somewhat  with  regard  not  only  to  questions  concerning 
single  learning  processes  but  also  to  some  questions  with 
respect  to  the  formation  of  multiple  habits.1 

In  the  present  series2  the  general  program  was  similar 
to  that  used  in  maze-running  experiments  with  adults. 
The  material  needed  was  two  packs  of  cards  of  quite  different 
kinds.  For  one  a  'flinch'  deck  was  used  which,  with  all 
numbers  of  II  and  higher  discarded,  furnished  ten  cards 
each  for  the  numbers  I  to  10,  one  hundred  in  all.  For  the 
other  pack,  one  hundred  blank  cards  of  size,  shape,  and 
general  'feel'*  similar  to  the  'flinch'  cards  were  obtained, 
and  upon  them  were  printed  autographs  in  script  by  means 

1  For  studying  the  interference  of  habits  it  has  been  used  by  Bergstrom,  Brown, 
Culler,  Pyle.     The  study  of  Pyle,  referred  to  above,  which  is  almost  identical  in  some 
regards  with  this  section  of  the  present  paper,  appeared  while  these  experiments  were 
in  progress.    The  corroboration  of  his  findings  has  its  own  value,  and  hence  this 
section  is  included  in  the  paper. 

2  For  the  data  on  the  card  sorting  experiment  the  writer  is  indebted  to  Miss  Helen 
G.  Smith. 


METHODS  OF  LEARNING   TWO  HABITS  127 

of  rubber  stamps  obtained  from  men  on  the  campus,  one 
autograph  for  each  ten  cards,  ten  autographs  for  the  whole 
pack.  The  general  procedure  was  to  have  each  subject  use 
one  of  the  packs  for  learning  to  deal  to  two  different  distri- 
butions or  lay-outs  on  the  table  by  one  method  (Complete 
or  Alternate),  and  to  use  the  other  pack  for  learning  two 
different  distributions  by  the  other  method.  See  Table  III. 

TABLE  III 

SHOWING  DISTRIBUTION  PATTERNS  USED 

With  "flinch  "cards: 

Pattern  F  Pattern  / 

3847        10  28        10        53 

69152  71496 

With  autographed  cards: 

Pattern  A  Pattern  a 

JSCLM  GBNLF 

NGRFB  CJSMR 

The  subjects  used  were  four  college  students,  Juniors  and 
Seniors,  referred  to  as  Br,  Bu,  P,'and  H.  They  all  cooperated 
well  throughout. 

They  worked  at  the  experiment  daily  for  ten  days. 
They  were  given  a  total  of  twenty-five  deals  in  which  to 
learn  each  lay-out  pattern;  but  these  deals  were  arranged  in 
the  two  different  orders,  the  Complete  and  the  Alternate. 
Table  IV.  shows  in  detail  the  program  of  the  work  as  carried 
out.  The  letters  denote  the  lay-out  patterns,  as  given  above 
in  Table  III.,  the  figures  indicate  the  number  of  deals  on  each 
day  to  that  lay-out. 

The  subjects  were  instructed  to  make  each  deal  as  rapid 
as  possible  and  were  warned  that  time  would  be  taken. 
A  misdeal  had  to  be  corrected  before  continuing. 

The  graphic  method  again  recommends  itself  as  the 
clearest  way  of  presenting  the  results.  See  Fig.  7,  in  which 
the  individual  records  are  shown  separately. 

It  is  to  be  observed  at  once  that  the  Alternate  method  of 
practice  in  dealing  to  two  different  distributions  is  unques- 
tionably inferior  to  the  Complete  method.  This  is  strikingly 
true  in  the  matter  of  actual  amounts  of  time  taken,  shown  by 
the  lower  vertical  positions  on  the  graphs.  What  is  less 


128 


J.  F.  DASH1ELL 


r  i  GURU     7 


H 1 — I \- 


IO     15    SO    25    JO    Jf 

7"  >/.«/• 


METHODS  OF  LEARNING   THO  HABITS 


129 


TABLE  IV 

SHOWING  PROGRAM  or  CARD-SORTING  EXPERIMENTS 


Sub- 
ject* 

Fir»t  Day 

Srronil 

Dmy 

Third  Day 

Fourth 
D.y 

Fifth  Day 

Sixth  Day 

Seventh 
Day 

Eighth  Dmy 

Ninth  Day 

Tenth  Day 

Br. 
Bu. 

?  .. 
«.. 

7" 

A" 

A*  and  a5 
altern. 
F*  and  /' 
altern. 

A*  and  a» 
altern. 
/"•  and  /» 
altern. 
/">• 

J» 

/•» 

^10 

^*  and  a» 
altern. 
F»  and  /• 
altern. 

A  •  and  a» 
altern. 
F*  and  /» 
altern. 

/-10 

^10 

f»  then/' 
^•then  a» 

A*  and  <?» 
altern. 
/**  and  /« 
altern. 

y^1  and  a* 
altern. 
f»  and  /» 
altern. 
F»  then/* 

//'then  a* 

/» 

a>« 

^»  and  a» 

altern. 
F*  and  /* 
altern. 

A*  and  a» 
altern. 
/*and/' 
altern. 
/" 

aio 

f* 

a'« 

y/*  and  a* 
altern. 
/"»  and  /* 

altern. 

A1  and  «• 

altera. 
F*  and  /• 

altern. 
/'• 

a" 

apparent  in  the  curves  but  is  shown  in  the  numerical  data 
is  also  a  greater  irregularity  in  the  rate  of  progress  in  learning 
by  the  Alternate  method.  Table  V.  gives  the  warrant  in 
figures  for  both  these  conclusions. 

TABLE  V 

SHOWING  SCORES  IN  CARD  SORTING 


Subject 

Method 

Average  Time  Taken 
(Seconds) 

Index  of  Irregularity 

Br  

Complete 

6l.O 

c.7 

Bu  

Alternate 
Complete 

74-8 

ci.6 

9-5 
«;.7 

P  

Alternate 
Complete 

68.6 
67.4. 

6-9 

A.  2 

H  

Alternate 
Complete 

74.0 
e87 

5-3 

A.f 

Alternate 

72-5 

5-1 

What  has  been  demonstrated  for  maze  learning  is  found 
to  hold  true  also  for  card  sorting.  It  would  seem  to  follow 
that  the  principle  would  be  found  to  apply  to  all  forms  of 
true  sensori-motor  or  perceptual-motor  habit  formation. 

V.  ADDING  BY  ADULTS 

If  certain  principles  are  found  to  hold  true  of  a  particular 
region  in  the  whole  field  of  learning,  an  important  question 
then  arising  is,  will  they  hold  true  of  all  learning  in  general? 
To  make  one  further  step  in  this  logical  direction,  the  author 
sought  an  answer  to  the  fundamental  question  of  this  research 
in  connection  with  learning  on  a  'higher'  plane  than  the 
perceptual-motor.  As  a  more  'purely  mental'  process  that 


13°  /.  F.  DASHIELL 

is  yet  sufficiently  of  the  habit  type  to  be  easily  recorded  and 
measured  objectively,  numerical  computation  suggested  itself. 
Addition  was  taken  as  a  particular  form  of  computation  the 
improvement  in  which  might  serve  as  an  interesting  task  to 
students,  especially  in  view  of  the  practical  value  of  adding 
ability. 

The  subjects  were  ten  summer  session  students  of  college 
grade,  members  of  the  writer's  class  in  the  psychology  of 
training.  The  adding  work  was  given  during  the  first  few 
minutes  of  each  class  hour,  the  class  meeting  usually  five  days 
in  the  week.  The  students  were  fully  informed  of  the  prob- 
lem in  hand;  in  fact,  it  was  treated  as  a  concrete  side  of  the 
material  of  the  course.  Their  daily  individual  and  group 
records  were  exhibited  at  the  following  meeting,  both  numer- 
ically and  graphically.  The  writer  was  convinced,  and  was 
so  assured  by  the  students,  that  their  interest  in  the  adding 
was  throughout  high,  generally  being  keen. 

The  material  used  consisted  of  mimeographed  addition 
blanks,  with  thirty  examples  on  each  sheet,  each  example 
consisting  of  ten  two-place  numbers  in  vertical  order.  Six 
sets  of  the  material  were  provided,  and  the  sets  used  in  rota- 
tion. 

The  experiment  was  conducted  as  follows:  One  copy  of 
the  examples  to  be  used  for  that  day  was  given  face  down  to 
each  student  at  his  desk.  At  a  signal,  all  turned  their  papers 
over  and  immediately  set  to  adding,  continuing  until  the 
stop  signal  was  given  aloud  at  the  end  of  five  minutes. 

Both  in  order  to  eliminate  some  of  the  elements  of  psy- 
cho-physical adjustment  to  the  work,  in  a  sense  somewhat 
extraneous  to  the  problem  at  hand,  and  in  order  to  have  some 
basis  for  dividing  the  class  into  two  groups  as  equal  as  pos- 
sible, a  preliminary  series  of  trials  in  simple  addition  was 
given.  In  these  trials  the  subjects  added  the  numbers 
vertically  digit  by  digit  and  column  by  column.  The 
results  were  taken  in  terms  of  single  columns  or  half  columns 
added.  This  was  done  for  the  five-minute  period  at  thirteen 
successive  class  hours.  On  the  basis  of  the  individual  scores 
made  the  experimenter  divided  the  class  into  two  groups  of 


METHODS  OF  LEARNING   TWO  HABITS  13* 

five  each,  for  the  formal  experimental  series.     Fig.  8  gives 
the  average  scores  of  the  individuals  as  so  grouped. 

For  approaching  the  question  as  to  the  relative  efficacy  of 
learning  two  kinds  of  addition  by  the  Complete  or  by  the 
Alternate  procedures,  it  was  necessary  to  fix  upon  addition 
methods  that,  while  having  some  elements  in  common,  would 


10     //      IZ     /3 


yet  differ  in  important  ways.  Moreover,  the  addition  methods 
had  to  be  novel.  The  plan  hit  upon  was  to  use  for  the  one 
method  or  habit  to  be  learned,  the  adding  of  two-place  num- 
bers horizontally,  from  left  to  right,  adding  the  units  first  and 
then  the  tens.  The  other  habit  decided  upon  was  the  adding 
of  the  two-place  numbers  vertically,  but  by  grouping  them: 
adding  first  the  odd-place  numbers  together  and  noting  down 
the  sum,  then  the  even-place  numbers  likewise.  Thus  with  the 


I32  J-  F.  DA$HIELL 

blank  partly  given  in  Table  VI,  the  horizontal  method  would 
involve  adding  successively  the  digits  4-5-2-9-8,  etc.,  for 
unit  place  in  the  sum,  and  8-3-5-7,  etc->  for  the  tens  and 
hundreds;  the  vertical  method  would  require  adding  the 
digits  6-9-7-5-1  and  3-5-7-4-9  for  the  total  308  of  the  odd 
numbers,  and  then  adding  8-4-2-3-4  and  6-3-6-2-8  for  the 
total  271  of  the  even  numbers.  As  in  the  simple  addition 
in  the  preliminary  series  a  complete  sum  obtained  horizontally 
counted  as  two  columns;  a  sum  of  only  odd-place  or  of  only 
even-place  numbers  obtained  vertically  counted  as  one  column. 

TABLE  VI 

SHOWING  PART  OF  SAMPLE  ADDITION  BLANK 

84        35        52        79        18        44        63        85        59        27 
9*  —       —       — 

13 

62        —  Etc. 

77 

34 

59 

68 

36 

The  program  followed  was  for  one  group  (C)  to  practice 
the  horizontal  habit  for  seven  trials  in  succession  then  to 
practice  the  vertical  method  for  the  remaining  seven  trials; 
and  for  the  other  group  (A)  to  practice  at  horizontal  adding 
on  the  first,  third,  fifth,  etc.,  days,  and  at  vertical  adding  on 
the  second,  fourth,  sixth,  etc.,  days. 

For  simplicity's  sake  the  results  of  the  formal  series  will 
be  given  in  terms  of  number  of  columns  added,  corrected  for 
accuracy  by  deducting  a  half  column  for  each  error. 

It  was  early  observed  that  these  two  habits  were  not  of 
equal  difficulty  (as  had  apparently  been  the  case  in  all  the 
preceding  experiments),  the  vertical  habit  being  clearly  the 
harder.  The  gross  average  number  of  columns  added  ver- 
tically by  group  A  was  found  to  be  only  83.8  per  cent  of  the 
number  added  horizontally,  the  corrected  average  of  the 
number  added  vertically  being  84.3  per  cent  of  the  corrected 
average  of  the  horizontal  additions.  For  group  C  the  cor- 
responding uncorrected  and  corrected  averages  bore  the 


METHODS  OF  LEARNING  TWO  HABITS 


133 


ratios  89.6  per  cent  and  89.9  per  cent,  respectively.  In 
order,  then,  to  be  able  to  show  the  relations  between  the 
two  habits  it  was  necessary  to  make  them  more  commen- 
surable by  using  the  above  ratios  of  corrected  averages  for 
the  two  groups  as  bases  for  weighting.  Thus,  the  group  A 
average  for  each  trial  by  the  vertical  method  was  considered 
as  84.3  per  cent  and  raised  to  loo  per  cent;  the  group  C 


^--. 


Z3-  - 


/5- 

k 
» 

Id- 

i'7 

V 

16 
15 
/f 


-----         Q  T  0  U.  p         C 


/      Z      3 


76       9      10      Jl      IZ      13      /+ 


456 

T  r  ;*./* 

average  for  each  trial  by  the  vertical  method  was  similarly 
increased  from  89.9  per  cent  to  100  per  cent. 

The  resulting  data  for  both  groups  by  both  habits  are 
plotted  graphically  in  Fig.  9.  Here  we  see  a  very  clear 
superiority  in  the  work  done  by  the  group  adding  by  the 
Complete  method.  The  curve  showing  their  horizontal 
adding  is  consistently  high.  What  is  more  striking,  however, 
is  the  extreme  rapidity  of  improvement  in  vertical  addition 


134  J>  F.  DA SHI ELL 

when  once  it  was  undertaken  and  practiced  without  inter- 
ruption. One  doubtful  feature  of  the  record  is  the  inter- 
pretation of  the  relatively  good  performance  by  the  C  group 
at  the  very  first  trial.  If  our  preliminary  scores  for  the  two 
groups  are  reliable  (see  Fig.  8)  such  high  initial  score  is  not 
due  to  greater  initial  general  ability  in  adding. 

In  the  matter  of  regularity  in  improvement  the  curves 
speak  more  clearly  than  numerical  figures.  The  index  of 
irregularity  found  for  group  A  is  1.3,  that  for  group  C  is  1.5. 
Unquestionably,  this  difference  does  not  speak  for  a  lesser 
irregularity  in  improvement  for  A  so  much  as  for  the  great 
drop  by  the  C  group  in  starting  the  learning  of  the  second 
habit.  In  any  case  the  difference  is  small,  and  the  outstand- 
ing feature  of  the  results  is  the  much  more  rapid  progress 
shown  by  the  group  learning  one  habit  at  a  time. 

SUMMARY 

We  have  approached  the  question  as  to  the  relative 
efficacy  of  learning  two  habits  by  practicing  them  alternately 
(the  Alternate  method)  or  by  getting  one  to  some  extent 
fixed  before  practicing  the  other  (the  Complete  method). 
The  approach  was  made  with  the  use  of  mazes  for  rats, 
children,  and  adults,  then  extended  to  include  another 
perceptual-motor  habit,  card  sorting,  and  further  still  to 
include  a  habit  involving  very  little  of  the  motor  element, 
addition. 

The  particular  technique  of  the  different  experiments 
was  intentionally  varied  considerably:  (a)  in  temporal  dis- 
tribution of  trials,  (&)  in  stage  at  which  shift  was  made 
from  one  to  the  other  habit  by  the  Complete  method,  (c) 
in  arrangement  of  controls — division  of  subjects  into  groups, 
(d)  in  methods  of  scoring,  (e)  in  incentives  used,  (/)  in  sub- 
jects' previous  familiarity  with  the  habits  to  be  learned, 
(g)  in  subjects'  knowledge  of  the  number  and  order  of  the 
habits  to  be  learned,  (k)  in  subjects'  knowledge  of  the  nature 
of  the  problem  investigated.  Thus,  the  general  results  found 
may  be  considered  as  independent  of  particular  details  of 
technique  and  to  be  of  general  bearing. 


METHODS  OF  LEARNING  TWO  HABITS  135 

For  results,  it  has  been  found  that  in  all  the  forms  of 
double  habit  formation  studied,  learning  by  the  Complete 
method  is  more  economical  than  learning  by  the  Alternate 
method.  This  is  indicated  in  the  different  sets  of  experiments 
in  terms  of  the  different  criteria  of  efficiency  respectively 
applicable.  They  include:  (a)  the  number  of  trials  necessary 
to  fix  a  habit,  (b)  the  degree  of  regularity  in  improvement, 

(c)  the  average  amounts  of  scores  made  on  individual  trials, 

(d)  the  rate  of  acceleration  of  improvement. 


THE  TONAL  MANIFOLD 

BY  R.  M.  OGDEN 

Cornell  University 

Psychologists  have  often  resorted  to  graphic  representa- 
tions, both  bi-  and  tri-dimensional,  in  endeavoring  to  express 
the  interrelationships  which  obtain  among  the  concurrent 
aspects  of  elementary  sensation.  The  most  successful  of 
these  attempts  has  been  in  the  field  of  vision  where  the  color 
triangle,  the  color  pyramid  and  the  color  cone  are  well 
known  as  means  of  setting  forth  the  dominant  features  of  the 
chromatic  and  the  achromatic  series  of  visual  sensations. 
Similar  schemes  have  not  been  wanting  for  the  other  senses, 
but  no  very  useful  representation  has  become  current  to 
elucidate  the  characteristic  features  of  auditory  sensation. 
Sometimes  the  tonal  manifold  has  been  represented  as  a 
straight  line  to  suggest  the  rise  of  pitch  from  low  to  high  tones, 
and  sometimes  a  spiral  has  been  used  in  order  that  the 
recurrent  similarities  of  the  octave  might  be  indicated  by 
points  directly  above  one  another  in  the  spiral  progression. 
But  the  latter  succeeds  only  in  emphasizing  the  recurrent 
likeness  of  octaves;  for  it  fails  to  distinguish  the  similar 
relations  obtaining  between  other  consonant  intervals.  In 
the  light  of  recently  acquired  knowledge  concerning  the 
volume  and  the  intensity  of  sound,  the  relations  of  pitch  and 
consonance  can  no  longer  be  regarded  as  the  dominant 
features  of  the  tonal  manifold,  and  it  is  now  possible  to  regard 
the  octave-quality  of  a  tone  as  perceptual  in  its  origin.  Al- 
though tonal  "consonance  is  still  a  debatable  question,  it 
seems  fairly  obvious,  upon  analysis,  that  the  octave,  or  any 
other  consonance,  subsists  in  the  relation  of  a  musical  interval; 
and  that  its  elemental  nature  is  therefore  either  an  implicit 
relation,  as  Stumpf  understands  it  to  be,  or  the  product  of  an 
implicit  or  an  explicit  act  of  perception  in  which  not  one  tone 
alone  but  two  different  tones  are  involved.  In  neither  case 
136 


THE  TONAL  MANIFOLD  »37 

does  a  quality  of  consonance  or  an  octave-character  attach 
itself  directly  to  the  simple  element  of  tonal  experience,  as 
does,  by  contrast,  its  pitch,  its  intensity,  or  its  volume. 

Unless  we  revise  our  whole  conception  of  sensory  analysis, 
the  characteristic  aspects  of  an  elemental  sound  are  now 
recognized  to  embrace  at  least  four  attributes;  namely,  pitch- 
brightness,  volume,  intensity,  and  duration.  Although  each 
of  these  is  a  variable,  the  particular  degree  of  each  which 
attaches  to  any  given  sound  is  determined  once  and  for  all 
by  the  psycho-physical  conditions  under  which  it  exists.  The 
octave-quality,  on  the  other  hand,  is  a  characteristic  which 
attaches  equally  to  all  tones  within  the  musical  range  when 
an  appropriate  reference  has  been  made  to  another  tone  of  the 
series.  Furthermore,  a  particular  tone,  though  it  can  have 
octaval  relationship  with  but  two  other  tones,  one  below  and 
one  above  it  in  the  series,  may  establish  numerous  consonances 
with  various  tones  both  above  and  below  it  in  pitch. 

In  addition  to  the  octave-quality  of  a  tone  there  is  also  a 
debatable  quality  which  is  supposed  to  enable  one  to  assign 
a  tone  to  its  appropriate  place  with  reference  to  certain  fixed 
regions  of  the  scale.  This  would  explain  the  occasional 
ability  of  a  person  to  judge  the  'absolute  pitch'  of  a  tone,  and 
it  has  also  been  thought  to  explain  certain  outstanding 
regions  of  pitch  with  which  the  vocal  qualities  seem  to  be 
associated.  Whether  a  c-ness,  d-ness,  e-ness,  etc.,  of  tones 
is  immediately  apprehended  without  involving  a  somewhat 
complicated  act  of  perception  is  a  question  we  shall  not  here 
attempt  to  decide,  but  in  view  of  the  fact  that  Oriental 
peoples  employ  scales  in  which  these  harmonic  designations 
have  no  significance,  it  seems  best  to  reserve  judgment  for  the 
present  and  test  the  possibility  of  some  other  explanation 
before  we  proceed  to  base  the  elusive  phenomena  of  absolute 
pitch  upon  a  universal  quality  inherent  in  tones  which  enables 
us  to  assign  them  to  their  appropriate  places  in  the  musical 
scale.  All  things  considered,  the  case  for  the  outstanding 
octaval  regions  with  which  the  chief  vowel-sounds  are  asso- 
ciated is  a  better  one;  but  even  here  there  are  other  possi- 
bilities of  interpreting  the  phenomena,  like  the  one  suggested 


138  R.  M.  OGDEN 

by  Watt,1  in  accordance  with  which  the  vocal  apparatus  is 
assumed  to  find  the  utterance  of  sound  at  one  region  of  pitch 
easier  than  at  another;  hence  the  tendency  to  give  prominence 
to  vocalization  at  this  region  and  likewise  at  other  regions, 
above  and  below,  which  are  in  octaval  relationship  with  it. 

For  our  present  purposes  we  shall  ignore  the  conflicting 
claims  as  to  the  qualitative  aspects  of  tone  other  than  the 
features  of  pitch-brightness,  volume,  intensity  and  duration 
which  have  already  been  mentioned,  and  shall  confine  our- 
selves to  the  first  three  of  these  in  the  graphic  representation 
which  accompanies  this  paper. 

We  have  before  us,  then,  a  representation  of  the  psycho- 
logical aspects,  or  attributes,  of  a  series  of  pure  tones  in  a 
progressive  manifold  extending  throughout  the  range  of  audi- 
bility. It  should  be  noted  that  the  dimensions  of  our  graph 
are  measured  in  terms  of  psychological  and  not  in  terms  of 
physical  components,  and  though  we  may  refer  to  vibrational 
frequency  and  vibrational  amplitude,  these  are  to  be  under- 
stood as  the  conditions  under  which  the  psychological  entities 
of  our  manifold  are  controlled  and  produced;  and  not  as 
being  themselves  involved  in  the  scheme. 

The  particular  tones  we  have  chosen  to  represent  are  the 
successive  octaves  conditioned  by  vibrations  ranging  from 
1 6  to  32,768  per  second.  Each  tone  is  pictured  with  a  certain 
spread  on  the  base-line  to  suggest  its  volume;  thence  rising 
to  a  peak  which  indicates  its  pitch.  The  height  of  this 
peak  above  the  base-line  measures  inherent  intensity,  and 
denotes  the  relative  sensitivity  of  hearing  at  different  degrees 
of  vibrational  frequency.  Duration,  since  it  involves  move- 
ment, is  not  included  in  the  scheme. 

It  will  be  observed  that  the  total  spread  or  volume  of  the 
lowest  audible  tone  comprises  within  its  range  the  volumic 
emplacement  of  all  higher  tones,  the  extreme  upper  point  of 
emplacement  being  identical  for  all  tones.  This  accords  with 
Watt's  theory2  and  seems  to  be  justified  on  the  grounds  he 
has  advanced.  But  Watt's  further  assumption,  that  'when 

1  Cf.  Brit.  J.  Psychol.,  1914,  7,  pp.  12-13. 
z  'The  Psychology  of  Sound,'  1917. 


THE  TONAL  MANIFOLD  *39 

octaves  are  played,  the  upper  tone  coincides  with  the  upper 
half  of  the  lower  tone  .  .  .,'  l  is  no  longer  acceptable  in  the 
light  of  Rich's  determination  of  the  threshold  for  volume.2 
If  the  increments  of  vibrational  frequency  necessary  to  pro- 
duce liminal  differences  of  volume  depend  upon  a  constant 
fractional  increase  in  the  middle  range  of  the  scale,  then 
octaves  within  this  range  must  differ  by  a  constant  number 
of  steps,  which  precludes  the  possibility  of  Watt's  assumption 
that  the  volume  of  the  upper  tone  of  an  octave  should  always 
be  half  the  size  of  the  lower  tone. 

Decrease  in  the  spread  or  size  of  volume  by  a  constant 
amount  is  indicated  for  octaves  throughout  the  musical  range 
of  the  tones  here  pictured  (64  to  2,048  vibrations).  Both 
above  and  below  this  range,  however,  the  fractional  increase 
is  presumed  to  vary.  The  volumes  of  the  lowest  tones  are 
represented  to  be  greater  than  the  normal  increase  would 
warrant,  and  their  pitches  are  displaced  to  the  right,  indicating 
the  known  tendency  of  low  tones  to  appear  higher  in  pitch 
than  they  should.  Similarly  the  highest  tones  are  shown 
decreasing  more  rapidly  in  volume  than  they  do  at  the  middle 
range;  while  their  peaks  are  displaced  to  the  left — indicating 
the  tendency  to  regard  tones  of  the  four-accented  octave  and 
above  as  flat.  The  total  range  of  volume  has  been  divided 
somewhat  arbitrarily  into  228  steps,  each  step  representing  a 
discernible  interval  as  determined  by  a  clearly  defined  dif- 
ference of  volume.  According  to  the  investigations  of  Rich,8 
the  threshold  of  volume  is  approximately  .02  to  .03  of  the 
vibrational  frequency.  Since  the  interval  of  the  semitone  is 
about  .06,  we  have  taken  .03,  or  the  quarter-tone,  as  being 
the  threshold  for  interval-distance,  and  have  plotted  the 
curves  with  abscissae  measuring  228  just  noticeable  differences 
of  interval  from  the  lowest  to  the  highest  tones. 

In  the  middle  range  of  the  scale  the  volume  for  each  octave 
is  so  plotted  that  it  diminishes  at  the  constant  rate  of  24 
quarter-tone  intervals.  In  the  highest  and  lowest  ranges  of 

I0p.  tit.,  p.  212. 

*  Amer.  J.  of  Psychol.,  1919,  30,  pp.  122  ff. 

1  L.c.  and  /.  of  Exper.  Psychol.,  1916,  i,  pp.  13  ff. 


14°  R-  M.  OGDEN 

the  scale,  however,  judgment  of  intervals  is  known  to  be  less 
certain.  Tones  below  40  vibrations  appear  to  be  a  little 
higher  than  would  be  warranted  by  the  rate  of  vibration; 
while  in  the  upper  range  tones  of  3,000  vibrations  and  above 
seem  flat,  and  at  about  4,000  vibrations,  according  to  von 
Maltzew,1  accurate  judgment  of  intervals  breaks  down  com- 
pletely. Equal  decrease  of  volume  as  a  basic  feature  in  the 
determination  of  octaves  and  other  musical  intervals  extends, 
therefore,  only  through  tones  that  range  from  about  50  to 
about  3,200  vibrations  in  the  second.  The  volumes  of  the 
lower  tones  are  made  relatively  larger,  and  of  the  higher  tones, 
relatively  smaller,  than  the  normal  variation  of  the  middle 
register  would  allow. 

Turning  now  to  the  pitch  of  tones,  this  is  indicated  by  the 
central  point  or  salient  in  the  upward-rising  mass  of  volume. 
It  will  be  noted  at  once  that  as  volume  decreases  the  pitch 
becomes  more  salient,  or  pointed.  This  suggests  the  bright- 
ness characteristic.  As  pitch  rises  it  emerges  more  and  more 
clearly;  it  becomes  more  and  more  salient.  The  upward 
trend  from  the  base-line  also  suggests  the  variation  of  inherent 
intensity  attaching  to  tones  of  different  pitch-levels.  The 
curve  which  circumscribes  the  salient  peaks  of  these  progres- 
sive tones  is  the  one  determined  by  Max  Wien  in  his  study 
of  auditory  sensitivity  for  tones  of  different  pitch.2  According 
to  Wien's  investigation  sensitivity  to  tones  increases  rapidly 
from  the  lowest  audible  tones  to  those  of  about  2,000  vibra- 
tions when  it  begins  to  diminish,  first  slowly,  and  then  more 
rapidly. 

This  curve  of  sensitivity  is  of  especial  interest  because  of 
the  indication  it  gives  as  to  differential  sensitivity  for  pitch. 
In  the  lower  range,  successive  tones  coincide  to  so  large  an 
extent  that  the  sensitivity  for  pitch  is  not  much  greater  than 
the  sensitivity  for  volumic  differences.  The  pitch-salients  of 
low  tones  are  vague  and  indefinite,  and  an  appreciable  distance 
or  interval  is  therefore  requisite  before  one  pitch  can  emerge 
distinctly  from  another.  At  a  higher  level  this  is  not  the 

1  Zsch.f.  Psychol.,  1913,  64,  pp.  161  ff. 

2  Cf.  Pfliiger's  Archiv.,  1903,  97,  pp.  I  ff. 


THE  TONAL  MANIFOLD  14* 

case,  for  with  salient  tones  one  pitch  distinguishes  itself  from 
another  even  though  there  is  no  perceptible  volumic  difference 
upon  which  a  judgment  of  interval  can  rest.  Thus  the  num- 
ber of  discriminable  pitches  within  an  octave  increases  steadily 
until  we  reach  tones  in  the  region  of  2,000  vibrations  when  it 
begins  to  decrease.  Decrease  of  sensitivity  in  the  upper 
range,  together  with  inability  to  judge  volume  accurately, 
both  correlate  with  a  falling  off  in  ability  to  discriminate  pitch; 
although  the  absolute  difference  of  vibrational  frequencies 
required  for  a  given  interval  being  progressively  greater  in 
the  higher  range,  may  therefore  occasion  a  larger  number 
of  discriminable  pitches  per  interval  than  is  to  be  found  for 
the  same  interval  at  a  lower  level  of  the  scale. 

We  have  thus  represented  in  our  figure  the  progression  of 
tones  throughout  the  range  of  audibility  and  have  indicated 
in  a  general  way  the  course  taken  by  volume,  pitch,  and 
intensity.  It  remains  to  add  a  few  words  regarding  brightness. 
In  a  previous  paper  on  the  attributes  of  sound,1  I  have  sug- 
gested that  brightness  be  added  to  the  list  of  auditory  attrib- 
utes. It  is  obvious  enough  that  sounds  are  characterized 
not  only  as  big  or  little,  loud  or  soft,  long  or  short,  high  or 
low,  but  also  as  piercing  or  dull.  But  it  is  still  an  open  ques- 
tion whether  this  latter  characteristic,  variously  referred  to 
as  brightness-dullness;  shrillness-mellowness  and  sometimes  as 
vocality,  merits  consideration  as  an  independent  variable. 
Rich,  who  made  some  study  of  brightness  in  his  recent  experi- 
mental investigation  upon  the  attributes  of  tone,  comes  to 
the  tentative  conclusion  that  while  the  term  is  valid  for 
descriptive  purposes,  brightness  is  not  independent  of  pitch, 
since  each  appears  to  have  the  same  threshold  for  differential 
judgments.  He  therefore  suggests  that  pitch-brightness  would 
be  a  more  appropriate  description  for  a  single  attribute 
hitherto  called  pitch.2  This  is  very  probably  the  case  as 
regards  the  tonal  manifold,  but  as  mentioned  above  brightness 
has  also  been  linked  with  vocality,  and  it  is  in  this  connection 
that  I  still  desire  to  recommend  further  investigation  before 

1  Cf.  PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1918,  25,  pp.  227  ff. 
1  Cf.  Artur.  J.  ofPsychol.,  1919,  30,  p.  157  f. 


142  JR.  M.  OGDEN 

we  discard  it  as  unnecessary  to  the  complete  description 
of  sound. 

Thus  far  in  this  paper  we  have  confined  ourselves  to  but 
one  species  of  sound — namely,  tone.  But  there  are  at  least 
two  other  perceptual  objects  of  sound:  the  vocable  and  the 
noise.  The  latter  may  perhaps  be  dismissed  from  our  present 
reckoning,  for  noise  is  commonly  regarded  as  a  complex 
sound  all  of  whose  components  can  be  described  either  as 
tones  or  as  vowels.  Although  such  a  conclusion  is  by  no 
means  certain,  an  additional  attribute  which  may  furnish  a 
basis  for  the  perception  of  noise  is  not  at  present  under 
consideration. 

In  the  case  of  vocalic  sounds,  however,  we  have  a  type  of 
percept  which  offers  some  interesting  features  when  it  is 
compared  with  the  perception  of  tones.  The  investigations 
of  Kohler,1  Miller,2  and  Schole3  have  indicated  the  regions 
of  vibrational  frequency  which  seem  to  characterize  the  chief 
vowels.  Yet  Kohler's  conclusion  that  the  vowel  is  defined 
by  a  certain  pitch  has  not  been  confirmed  by  other  investi- 
gators. Jaensch,4  has  made  an  apparently  successful  attempt 
to  produce  vocalic  sounds  synthetically.  His  results  indicate 
that  a  compound  of  pendular-formed  vibrations,  varying  but 
slightly  from,  one  another  in  frequency,  possesses  a  vocalic 
character  which  passes  over  into  noise  as  the  mean  variation 
of  the  vibrational  components  increases  beyond  a  certain 
point.  Unfortunately  Jaensch's  method  does  not  permit  us 
to  determine  just  what  vibrational  frequencies  combine  to 
give  an  optimal  vocalic  effect,  and  as  the  investigation  has 
not  been  repeated,  his  results  have  thus  far  received  less 
attention  than  they  seem  to  merit. 

It  is  highly  desirable  that  this  matter  should  be  re-investi- 
gated, for  if  it" be  true  that  the  characteristic  feature  of  a 
vocalic  sound  is  obtained  by  compound  regional  vibrations, 
rather  than  by  a  simple  pendular-formed  wave,  the  difference 
between  vocalic  sounds  and  tones  might  be  manifest  when  a 

1  Cf.  Zsch.  f.  Psychol.,  1910,  58,  pp.  59  ff. 

2  Cf.  'The  Science  of  Musical  Sounds,'  New  York,  1916. 

3  Cf.  Arch.f.  d.  ges.  Psychol,  1918,  38,  pp.  38  ff. 
*  Cf.  Zsch.f.  Sinnesphysiol.,  1913,  47,  pp.  219  ff. 


THE  TONAL  MANIFOLD  143 

variation  in  brightness  takes  place  without  an  alteration  of 
pitch.  An  investigation  of  Baley1  demonstrates  that  the 
pitch  of  such  a  combination  is  indeed  that  of  its  mean  tone, 
and  if  the  components  of  the  sound-mass  are  very  near  one 
another  in  frequency,  it  would  certainly  be  impossible  to 
analyze  them  perceptually.  Hence  the  sound  must  be  of 
elemental  simplicity.  The  question  is,  does  it  possess  the 
vocal  character  which  Jaensch  has  assigned  to  it?  If  so, 
this  change  must  be  occasioned  by  an  attribute  other  than 
pitch,  intensity,  volume,  or  duration.  Such  a  variant  is 
indicated  by  the  term  brightness,  represented  in  our  graphic 
scheme  by  the  pointedness  or  salience  of  pitch;  for  salience 
must  be  reduced  when  a  number  of  different  tonal  components 
of  slightly  varying  frequencies  are  combined.  While  the  pitch 
does  not  vary,  brightness  must  necessarily  decrease  and  pass 
into  dullness;  thus  the  characteristic  of  the  vocalic  sound  is 
presumed  to  appear. 

I  have  myself  been  unable  to  make  but  a  casual  observa- 
tion with  the  aid  of  an  Appunn  tonometer  upon  the  effect 
of  compounding  tones  of  slightly  varying  pitch.  If  one  adds 
successive  tones  of  slightly  varying  pitch  on  this  instrument 
the  sound  becomes  rapidly  confused  and  noisy,  though  the 
tonal  character  of  the  whole  does  not  readily  disappear. 
But  there  is  also  noticeable  a  nasal  quality  which  seemed  to 
be  most  clearly  manifest  after  the  addition  of  a  single  tone. 
The  nasal  quality  impressed  me  as  vocalic  and  since  the 
smallest  increment  on  the  tonometer  was  four  vibrations,  I 
suspect  that  the  threshold  for  vocalic  sounds  would  lie  within 
this  range  of  vibrational  difference;  though  possibly  the 
number  of  components  necessary  to  reduce  the  saliency  of 
pitch  is  more  important  than  the  range  of  the  components. 

Until  further  investigations  have  been  made  the  whole 
matter  is  merely  one  of  conjecture.  But  Jaensch's  experi- 
ments are  certainly  suggestive,  and  I  find  nothing  in  the 
results  of  Kohler,  Schole,  or  Miller  to  discredit  them.  Hence 
I  conclude  that  even  if  brightness  and  pitch  correlate  directly 
with  increase  of  vibrational  frequency  in  the  upward  trend 

1  Zsch.f.  Psychol.,  1913,  67,  pp.  261  ff. 


R.  M.  OGDEN 


of  simple  tones,  brightness  may  nevertheless  manifest  a 
variability  independent  of  pitch  if  the  conditions  of  sound- 
production  are  such  that  a  varied  number  of  closely  graded 
vibrational  components  unite  to  produce  a  series  of  sounds; 
for  under  these  conditions  a  series  is  conceivable  which  would 
pass  gradually  from  tone  through  vowel  to  noise  without  a 
noticeable  change  of  pitch  or  intensity;  and,  at  least  so  far 
as  concerns  the  appearance  of  the  vowel  sound,  without  an 
alteration  of  volume. 

As  the  sounds  become  noisy,  we  would  be  dealing  with 


10 
101- 


90  120 

INTERVALS 

FIG.  i 


210       228 


components  which  no  longer  hold  together  in  a  single  uniform 
impression,  after  discriminable  pitch,  intensity  and  volumic 
differences  had  one  or  all  made  themselves  felt.  In  this 
connection  the  variation  of  inherent  intensity  with  difference 
of  pitch  is  also  worth  noting,  for  excepting  the  region  of 
2,000  vibrations  and  thereabouts,  one  cannot  alter  vibrational 
frequencies  very  much  without  introducing  a  noticeable  dif- 
ference of  intensity  which  would  tend  to  destroy  the  uni- 
formity of  effect  even  if  the  objective  conditions  of  vibrational 
amplitude  were  to  remain  fairly  constant. 


THE  TONAL  MANIFOLD  '45 

ADDENDUM 

Since  the  preceding  article  was  submitted  for  publication 
an  opportunity  has  been  afforded  me  to  discuss  the  physical 
aspect  of  Jaensch's  theory  with  Professor  Dayton  C.  Miller. 
Although  he  had  not  read  Jaensch's  papers  on  the  subject, 
Professor  Miller  finds  no  evidence  for  the  "mixed  sine  curves" 
of  Jaensch  in  his  physical  analysis  of  the  vowels.  But 
although  he  accepts  the  Helmholtz  hypothesis,  rather  than 
Hermann's  formant  theory,  his  analyses  show  that  the  char- 
acteristic of  a  vowel  is  a  fixed  region  of  resonance,  within 
which  region  must  appear  some  partial  of  the  fundamental 
tone  upon  which  the  vowel  is  uttered.  Lacking  an  appro- 
priate partial  the  vowel  is  not  given.  Furthermore  the 
region  of  resonance  in  each  case  extends  over  a  considerable 
range  of  pitch  and  the  physical  aspect  of  the  significant 
partial  is  not  that  of  a  sharply  defined  tone,  but  rather  that  of 
a  distribution  of  energy  in  which  the  amplitude  of  the  partial 
in  question  is  limited  by  the  form  in  which  the  energy  is 
distributed  over  the  fixed  region  of  resonance.  Thus,  if  the 
partial  falls  near  the  middle  of  the  resonating  region  of  a 
certain  vowel,  its  utterance  is  more  pronounced  than  if  it  falls 
near  the  extremes  of  the  region.  But  in  any  case  the  adjacent 
parts  of  the  tonal  region  are  also  involved,  since  the  distribu- 
tion of  a  fairly  constant  amount  of  energy  over  the  entire 
region  is  requisite  to  produce  the  vowel. 

Miller's  results  are  therefore  not  entirely  at  variance  with 
Hermann's  theory  of  the  formant  or  fixed  tone,  which  Jaensch 
also  accepts;  although  Miller  regards  the  production  of  the 
formant  as  a  phenomenon  of  sympathetic  resonance,  while 
Hermann  refers  it  to  an  independent  "anaperiodic"  blowing  of 
the  mouth  resonator. 

As  regards  the  point  at  issue,  whether  the  vowel  is  differen- 
tiated from  tone  by  an  attributive  variation,  Miller's  analysis 
seems  to  show  that  not  one  but  a  number  of  auditory  recep- 
tors are  involved  in  its  production.  This  is  likewise  the 
view  of  Jaensch.  Whether  the  "mixed  sine  curves"  are 
products  of  the  sound  wave  or  functions  of  the  ear  mechanism 


146  R.  M.  OGDEN 

is  of  secondary  importance  if  the  mode  of  stimulation  is  in 
either  case  such  that  what  we  hear  is  a  mixture  of  adjacent 
pitches.  If,  as  Miller  agrees,  a  "sharp"  tone  in  the  character- 
istic region  of  resonance  would  tend  to  destroy  the  vowel 
effect,  then  a  dull  tone  aroused  by  stimulating  a  region  of 
resonance  rather  than  a  single  resonator  is  the  phenomenal 
basis  of  the  vocalic  sound.  Our  tentative  assumption  that 
brightness  may  vary  independently  of  pitch  is  therefore 
feasible,  and  the  way  is  open  to  determine  the  threshold  of 
this  variation  by  devising  experimental  means  for  securing  a 
regularly  graded  transition  from  the  simple,  sharply  defined 
resonance  of  a  single  vibrational  frequency  to  the  regional 
resonance  involving  a  more  extended  series  of  receptors. 
The  experimental  problem  is  perhaps  none  too  simple,  for 
the  variations  may  involve  shifting  amplitudes  and  differences 
of  phase  rather  than  a  direct  attack  upon  several  receptors 
at  once.  In  a  brief  paper  presented  before  the  Sixth  German 
Congress  for  Psychology,1  Jaensch  suggests  that  the  synthetic 
effects  which  occasion  vocalic  sounds  are  a  result  of  successive 
waves  which  introduce  complications  of  amplitude  not  sub- 
ject to  the  Fourier  analysis;  yet  the  brevity  of  his  report 
leaves  me  uncertain  that  I  clearly  understand  what  he 
means.  However,  despite  all  technical  difficulties  in  the 
control  of  the  experimental  conditions,  empirical  methods 
would  probably  yield  a  means  of  demonstrating  whether  or 
not  brightness  and  dullness  can  be  varied  without  a  corre- 
sponding alteration  of  pitch;  and  we  must  await  such  an 
experiment  before  we  can  be  assured  that  brightness  and 
pitch  are  separable  aspects  of  sound. 

1  Cf.  Sericht.  Leipzig:  Earth,  1914,  pp.  79  ff. 


IS   LACK  OF   INTELLIGENCE  THE   CHIEF  CAUSE 
OF  DELINQUENCY? 

BY  CURT  ROSENOW,  PH.D. 
Biometrist  to  the  Juvenile  Psychopathic  Institute,  Chicago,  Illinois 

A  great  deal  of  controversy  has  raged  about  the  question 
of  the  relative  importance  of  intelligence  (or  the  lack  thereof) 
as  a  causal  factor  of  delinquency.  In  the  present  paper  I 
wish  to  discuss  the  bearing  which  actual  modern  statistical 
findings  have  upon  this  issue,  in  order  to  clear  up  a  certain 
amount  of  confusion  and  misconception  which  seems  to  me 
to  exist.  Of  course,  in  the  last  analysis,  the  answer  arrived 
at  through  statistical  or  other  methods  comes  back  logically 
to  the  definitions  of  intelligence  and  delinquency  explicitly  or 
implicitly  used  by  some  particular  author.  But,  to  some 
minds,  the  fact  that  the  statistician  deals  as  a  rule  with  objec- 
tive fact,  and  uses  methods  which,  as  methods,  are  logically 
beyond  criticism,  means  that  the  findings  arrived  at  are  also 
beyond  cavil.  It  seems  worth  while  therefore  to  point  out 
that  the  very  opposite  is  true.  Statistical  findings  need  not 
only  all  of  the  scrutiny  and  criticism  so  lavishly  given  to 
conclusions  arrived  at  by  less  objective  methods,  but  in  addi- 
tion there  is  need  of  the  careful  checking  of  the  conclusions  so 
far  as  they  are  interpretations  of  the  statistical  constants. 

As  a  case  in  point  let  us  take  the  statistical  findings  of 
Goring.1  Goring  found  a  correlation  of  +0.66  between 
criminality  and  mental  deficiency,  and  this  coefficient  is 
considerably  higher  than  any  he  found  to  exist  between 
criminality  and  any  of  the  other  factors  which  he  investigated. 
He  sums  up  as  follows:  "Our  final  conclusion  is  that  English 
Criminals  are  selected  by  a  physical  condition,  and  a  mental 
constitution  which  are  independent  of  each  other — that  the 
one  significant  physical  association  with  criminality  is  a 
generally  defective  physique;  and  that  the  one  vital  mental 

1  'The  English  Convict.' 

'47 


148  CURT  ROSEN  OW 

constitutional  factor  in  the  etiology  of  crime  is  defective 
intelligence."1  ".  .  .  our  interim  conclusion  is  that,  rela- 
tively to  its  origin  in  the  constitution  of  the  malefactor,  and 
especially  in  his  mentally  defective  constitution?  crime  in  this 
country  is  only  to  a  trifling  extent  (if  to  any)  the  product  of 
social  inequality,  or  of  adverse  environment,  or  of  other 
manifestations  of  what  may  be  comprehensively  termed 
'the  force  of  circumstances.'"3  While  the  second  conclusion 
is  stated  tentatively,  Goring  makes  it  plain  that  he  believes 
that  it  should  be  accepted  in  the  absence  of  contrary  evidence 
based  on  better  data.  His  position  seems  to  me  to  be  well 
stated  by  Miner4  as  follows:  "While  there  is  always  a  possi- 
bility of  finding  some  other  factor  closely  related  to  delin- 
quency and  independent  of  capacity,  nevertheless  we  should 
hardly  urge  this  possibility  at  the  present  time  as  overweighing 
the  accumulation  of  negative  evidence  which  has  been  as- 
sembled in  recent  years,  especially  at  the  Galton  Laboratory." 

In  other  words,  Goring  guards  himself  sufficiently  against 
the  possibility  that  further  research  may  reverse  his  findings 
through  the  discovery  of  new  and  better  evidence.  He  does 
not  seem  to  see  that  the  future  must  reverse  his  conclusions, 
or,  better,  that  his  conclusions  simply  do  not  follow  from  his 
statistics.  He  is  correct  when  he  states  that  the  Intelligence- 
Delinquency  relation  is  the  most  important  relation  measured 
so  far  statistically.  He  is  absolutely  wrong  when  he  claims 
that,  in  the  absence  of  other  data,  we  must  accept  his  con- 
clusions as  the  nearest  approach  to  the  truth  attained  thus 
far.  For  if  the  coefficient  of  the  correlation  between  intel- 
ligence and  delinquency  is  +  0.66,  the  correct  conclusion  to 
be  drawn  is  that  it  is  exceedingly  probable  that  factors  other 
than  intelligence  are  of  greater  importance  as  determinants 
of  crime  than  intelligence. 

This  conclusion  follows  from  the  following  considerations. 
If  we  have  a  number  of  variables  one  of  which  is  of  special 
interest,  it  is  possible  to  express  the  relation  of  these  variables 

1  'The  English  Convict,'  p.  263. 

2  Italics  mine. 
8  Ibid.,  p.  287. 

4  '  Deficiency  and  Delinquency,'  p.  228. 


INTELLIGENCE  AND  DELINQUENCY  H9 

in  a  single  equation.  Let  D  stand  for  delinquency,  /  for 
intelligence,  and  N  for  a  combination  of  all  factors  other  than 
intelligence.  The  equation  will  then  take  the  form1 


.  P  tfd.tnl  ffd-  in  "j 

-  i\  rdi.n  -        \  +  n\  rdn.i- 

L  ffi-dnj  L  ffn-dij 


In  order  to  understand  the  meaning  of  this  equation  a 
certain  amount  of  explanation  will  be  necessary  for  the  reader 
not  versed  in  this  form  of  mathematics.  The  explanation 
however  has  been  confined  to  the  minimum  which  is  absolutely 
necessary,  and,  if  the  reader  will  take  the  mathematical 
assertions  for  granted,  he  will  be  able  to  follow  the  argument 
of  the  rest  of  this  paper.  The  expressions  in  brackets  are 
the  coefficients  of  partial  regression.  They  are,  in  effect, 
the  measures  of  the  relative  importance  of  intelligence  and  of 
the  other  factors.  For  the  sake  of  simplicity  of  statement 
let  us  assume  that  the  sum  of  the  factors  other  than  intelli- 
gence can  be  summed  up  under  the  term  economic  status. 
Then  if  the  measure  of  the  intelligence  of  any  given  individual 
is  known,  and  if  that  measure  is  multiplied  by  the  coefficient 
of  partial  regression  of  intelligence  on  delinquency,  the  result 
will  be  the  measure  of  the  delinquency  of  that  individual 
which  one  would  expect  from  his  intelligence,  independent  of 
his  economic  status;  and  if  the  measure  of  the  economic 
status  of  that  individual  is  multiplied  by  the  coefficient  of 
partial  regression  of  economic  status  on  delinquency,  the 
result  will  be  the  measure  of  the  delinquency  of  that  indi- 
vidual which  one  would  expect  from  his  economic  status, 
independent  of  his  intelligence.  The  sum  of  the  two  terms 
will  be  the  total  expected  delinquency  of  the  individual. 

The  expression  rd,-.n  is  the  coefficient  of  partial  correlation 
of  intelligence  and  delinquency.  It  measures  the  correlation 
of  delinquency  to  intelligence,  independent  of  economic 
status.  If,  for  example,  the  entire  population  were  arranged 
into  classes  according  to  economic  status,  so  that  all  indi- 
viduals within  any  one  group  were  equal  in  wealth  to  all 
other  members  of  their  group,  then,  within  any  such  group, 

1  In  this  equation,  D,  /,  and  N  are  expressed  as  deviations  from  their  respective 
means  in  terms  of  their  respective  standard  deviations. 


150  CURT  ROSEN OW 

differences  in  delinquency  cannot  possibly  be  related  to 
differences  in  economic  status,  because,  within  any  such  group, 
there  are  no  differences  in  economic  status.  Therefore, 
within  any  such  group,  the  correlation  of  intelligence  to 
delinquency  is  independent  of  economic  status.  Similarly, 
the  coefficient  of  correlation  rtn-i  is  the  measure  of  the  corre- 
lation of  economic  status  to  delinquency,  independent  of 
intelligence. 

The  reader  should  be  careful  not  to  confuse  coefficients  of 
correlation  with  coefficients  of  regression.  The  one  is  a 
measure  of  relation;  the  other  is  a  measure  of  relative  impor- 
tance. Consider  for  example  the  effect  of  the  moon,  the  sun, 
and  the  planet  Jupiter  upon  the  height  of  the  tides.  If  we 
were  able  to  measure  with  absolute  accuracy  the  influence 
of  each  of  these  heavenly  bodies,  the  partial  correlation 
between  the  position  of  Jupiter  and  the  height  of  the  tides 
would  be  well  nigh  perfect,  but  the  relative  importance  of 
the  position  of  this  planet  would  be  negligible. 

Having  explained  the  meaning  of  the  terms  of  our  equa- 
tion, we  may  return  to  the  consideration  of  the  equation  itself. 
In  any  given  actual  case,  the  right  and  left  sides  of  this  equa- 
tion will  not  be  exactly  equal.  For  example,  if  we  estimate 
the  degree  of  delinquency  of  any  given  individual  from  his 
known  intelligence  and  from  the  other  known  causes,  the 
estimated  delinquency  will  be  likely  to  differ  from  the  actual 
delinquency  because  we  are  dealing  with  imperfect  measures 
of  intelligence,  environmental  influence,  etc.,  and  because  we 
are  sure  to  have  left  some  of  the  causal  factors  out  of  account. 
If  however  we  imagine  ideally  perfect  conditions — if  all  the 
causes  of  delinquency  were  known  and  accurately  measured — 
the  two  sides  of  the  equation  would  be  exactly  equal.  Fur- 
ther, both  rdn.'i  (the  coefficient  of  the  relation  of  delinquency  to 
factors  other  than  intelligence,  intelligence  being  constant) 
and  Tdi-n  (the  coefficient  of  the  relation  of  delinquency  to 
intelligence,  all  other  factors  being  equal)  would  be  equal  to 
unity,  because,  under  the  ideal  conditions  imagined,  the  degree 
of  intelligence  would  of  course  be  a  perfect  measure  of  de- 
linquency, so  far  as  caused  by  lack  of  intelligence,  and  "all 


INTELLIGENCE  AND  DELINQUENCY 


'5' 


other  factors"  would  measure  perfectly  "all  other  resultant 
delinquency." 

The  above  considerations  open  up  the  possibility  of  sub- 
jecting Goring's  conclusions  to  quantitative  criticism.  For  the 
present  I  would  direct  the  attention  of  the  reader  to  the 
following  quantitative  problem.  Given  a  correlation  of 
+  0.66  between  lack  of  intelligence  and  delinquency,  under 
what  circumstances  will  the  correlation  to  delinquency  of  a 
combination  of  all  other  causal  factors  be  greater  than 
+  0.66? 

TABLE  I 


I 

DN-I 

2 

DI-N 

3 
DI 

4 
IN 

5 

Dtf 

I.OO 

.00 

0.66 

—  O.2O 

0.604 

.00 

.00 

0.66 

—O.I4 

0.652 

.00 

.00 

0.66 

-0.13 

0.659 

.00 

.00 

0.66 

-O.I2 

0.667 

.OO 

.00 

0.66 

O.OO 

0.7SI 

.00 

.00 

0.66 

O.2O 

0.868 

.00 

I.OO 

0.66 

0.40 

0-953 

.00 

1.  00 

0.66 

O.6o 

0.997 

.00 

0.66 

0.66 

0.66 

I.OOO 

Table  I.  supplies  the  answer  to  the  problem.  Column  I. 
shows  the  coefficients  of  partial  correlation  between  delin- 
quency and  the  factors  other  than  intelligence,  intelligence 
being  constant.  The  coefficients  are  i.oo  in  every  case  under 
the  assumed  ideal  conditions.  Column  2  shows  the  coeffi- 
cients of  partial  correlation  of  delinquency  to  intelligence, 
all  other  factors  being  constant.  These  coefficients  are  i.oo 
in  every  case  except  in  the  special  case  where  rdn  is  i.oo, 
when  rji-n  will  take  the  value  of  +  0.66  for  reasons  which 
will  be  easily  understood.  Column  3  shows  the  coefficients 
of  correlation  of  delinquency  to  lack  of  intelligence,  which 
are  +  0.66  in  every  case  by  definition.  In  column  4  there 
are  a  number  of  assumed  coefficients  showing  a  number  of 
possible  values  of  the  correlation  of  lack  of  intelligence  to  all 
other  factors.  Column  5  shows  the  coefficients  of  correlation 
between  delinquency  and  all  factors  other  than  intelligence 
which  would  necessarily  result  from  the  conditions  assumed 
in  the  other  4  columns.  Thus,  taking  the  first  horizontal 


152 


CURT  ROSEN  OW 


line,  if  the  coefficient  of  correlation  of  lack  of  intelligence  to 
delinquency  is  +  0.66,  if  the  coefficient  of  correlation  of 
intelligence  to  the  other  factors  —  0.20,  and  if  the  analy- 
sis is  ideally  complete  as  indicated  by  the  coefficients  of 
partial  correlation  of  columns  I  and  2,  then  the  coefficient 
of  correlation  of  the  factors  other  than  intelligence  to  de- 
linquency will  necessarily  have  a  value  of  +  O.6O4.1  And 
from  the  rest  of  the  table  we  see  that  it  will  have  a  value  equal 
to  or  greater  than  +  O.66  if  the  coefficient  of  the  correlation 
of  lack  of  intelligence  to  the  other  factors  is  between  —  0.13 
and  +  0.66. 

Common  sense  would  indicate  (in  a  situation  involving 
only  3  variables),  that  the  above  also  shows  the  limits  within 
which  the  factors  other  than  intelligence  are  of  greater  impor- 
tance than  intelligence.  But  as  a  quantitative  statement  of 
the  coefficients  of  importance  (regression)  may  be  of  some 
interest,  I  have  tabulated  them  in  table  II,  which  is  merely 
an  extension  of  table  I  with  the  first  three  columns  omitted. 
The  reader  will  remember  that  the  coefficient  of  correlation 
of  intelligence  to  delinquency  is  0.66  in  every  case. 

TABLE  II 


Correlation 

Correlation 

6 
Regression 

Regression 

IN 

DN 

DI-N 

DN'I 

—  O.2O 

0.604 

0.8134 

0.7667 

—0.14 

0.652 

0.7658 

0.7587 

-0.13 

.        0.659 

0.7586 

0.7577 

—  0.12 

0.667 

0.7505 

0.7567 

O.OO 

0-7SI 

0.6603 

0.7513 

O.2O 

0.868 

0.5068 

0.7667 

0.40 

0-953 

0.3306 

0.8197 

O.6O 

0.997 

0.0968 

0.9391 

0.66 

I.OOO 

o.oooo 

1  .0000 

Columns  4  and  5  are  identical  with  columns  4  and  5  of  Table 
I.  Column  6  shows  the  coefficients  of  partial  regression  of  in- 
telligence on  delinquency,  all  other  factors  being  constant, 
and  column  7  exhibits  the  coefficients  of  partial  regression  of 

1  The  coefficients  of  column  5  were  computed  by  solving  the  conventional  equation 
for  a  coefficient  of  partial  correlation  for  ran-  For  this  formula  as  well  as  the  other 
formuke  utilized  in  this  paper,  see  Yule's  'An  Introduction  to  the  Theory  of  Statistics,' 
Chap.  XII. 


INTELLIGENCE  AND  DELINQUENCY  »53 

the  factors  other  than  intelligence  on  delinquencey,  intelli- 
gence being  constant.  Thus  under  the  conditions  of  the 
first  horizontal  line  of  Tables  I.  and  II.,  the  importance  of 
intelligence  is  to  the  importance  of  the  other  factors  as 
+  0.8134  is  to  +0.7667.  We  see  that  "the  other  factors" 
begin  to  be  of  more  importance  than  intelligence  when  their 
correlation  with  intelligence  is  —  0.12,  and,  as  this  last  relation 
becomes  positive  and  increases  in  value,  the  other  factors 
become  twice,  and  even  ten  times  as  important  as  intelligence. 
Although  I  do  not  mean  to  enter  into  the  psychological 
aspects  of  the  case  in  the  present  paper,  I  may  remark  in 
passing  that  these  figures  become  highly  suggestive  if  one 
believes  that  character  is  closely  related  to  intellect  without 
being  in  any  sense  identical  with  it. 

At  any  rate,  it  follows  from  these  figures  that  lack  of 
intelligence  is  not  the  most  important  factor  in  the  causation 
of  delinquency  unless  we  have  a  right  to  assume  that  the  coeffi- 
cient of  correlation  of  intellignece  to  the  other  factors  is  negative 
and  greater  than  —  0.12.  But  according  to  the  best  of  our 
present  knowledge,  the  very  opposite  is  very  probably  true. 
We  may  divide  the  causal  factors  of  delinquency  other  than 
lack  of  intelligence  into  environmental  factors  and  factors 
peculiar  to  the  individual.  So  far  as  the  environment  is 
concerned,  we  know  that  poverty,  absence  of  parental  care 
and  supervision,  and  other  evils  in  and  out  of  the  home  pre- 
dominate amongst  the  ignorant.  Indeed  it  is  often  urged 
by  those  who  wish  to  minimize  the  importance  of  the  environ- 
ment that  the  poor  are  stupid  not  because  they  are  poor, 
but  that  they  are  poor  because  they  are  stupid.  For  our 
present  purpose,  we  are  not  concerned  with  this  issue  except 
to  note  that  ignorance  and  poverty  and  other  environmental 
factors  go  together  and  cannot  therefore  be  negatively  corre- 
lated. Therefore,  so  far  as  we  have  gone,  we  have  no  reason 
for  believing  that  Goring  has  shown  that  lack  of  intelligence 
is  the  most  important  factor  in  the  causation  of  delinquency. 
Our  evidence,  so  far,  points  in  the  opposite  direction.  So  far 
as  the  factors  peculiar  to  the  individual  are  concerned  nothing 
very  definite  can  be  said  in  the  present  state  of  our  knowledge. 


154  CURT  ROSENOW 

Definitions  in  this  field  are  either  lacking  or  are  so  vague 
and  general  that  they  tend  to  confuse  rather  than  clarify 
issues  such  as  the  one  we  are  considering.  Intelligence,  for 
example,  is  usually  defined  as  the  ability  to  adapt  to  the 
environment,  and,  inasmuch  as  anything  which  makes 
for  detected  delinquency  necessarily  makes  for  maladaptation, 
other  factors  would  be  ruled  out  by  definition.  It  is  however 
worthy  of  note  that  many  authors  hold  to  the  existence  of 
factors  other  than  intelligence  and  therefore  depart  from  the 
all  comprehensive  definition  of  intelligence,  implicitly  at  any 
rate.  Obviously  then  it  is  impossible  to  say  anything  very 
definite  about  the  probable  sign  of  the  correlation  existing 
between  intelligence  and  other  causes  of  delinquency.  In 
the  near  future  the  writer  hopes  to  show  that  intelligence 
and  moral  character,  when  subjected  to  functional  psycholog- 
ical analysis,  have  many  factors  in  common,  so  that  there  is 
every  reason  for  believing  the  relation  between  them  to  be 
positive.  At  present  it  must  suffice  to  point  out  that  there 
is  no  reason  for  believing  it  to  be  negative.  And,  as  there  is 
good  ground  for  believing  that  the  relation  of  intelligence  to 
the  environmental  factors  is  positive,  there  would  seem  to  be 
good  grounds  for  holding  that  lack  of  intelligence  is  not  the 
most  important  cause  of  delinquency,  and  no  grounds  at  all 
for  holding  that  it  is. 

But  even  though  lack  of  intelligence  is  not  of  greater 
importance  than  all  other  factors  taken  in  the  aggregate,  it 
may  be  urged  that  a  correlation  of  +  0.66  shows  that  it  is 
likely  to  be  the  largest  single  factor.  The  following  hypo- 
thetical example  will  show  that  that  is  not  at  all  likely  to  be 
the  case.  Suppose  that  in  addition  to  lack  of  intelligence 
there  are  six  other  known  causes  of  delinquency,  Xi,  Xz,  X3, 
X^  X&,  and  X6,  or  seven  causes  altogether.  Let  the  corre- 
lation of  each  of  these  seven  causes  to  delinquency  be  +  0.66, 
and  let  all  the  possible  intercorrelations  of  the  seven  causes 
with  each  other  be  +  0.50.  Let  the  relation  of  delinquency  to 
these  seven  causes  be  expressed  in  a  single  equation,  as  on 
page  149.  Then  suppose  that  the  degree  of  delinquency  and 
the  intensity  of  the  seven  causes  under  consideration  is 


INTELLIGENCE  AND  DELINQUENCY  '55 

known  with  perfect  accuracy  for  a  very  large  number  of 
individuals  and  that,  for  each  individual,  these  values  are 
entered  into  the  equation.  Then,  if  our  seven  causes  have 
furnished  us  with  a  complete  analysis  of  the  causes  of  delin- 
quency, the  right  and  left  sides  of  the  equation  will  be  exactly 
equal  in  each  and  every  individual  case.  If  the  analysis  is 
incomplete,  that  is  if  there  are  causes  not  included  under 
our  seven,  there  will  be  differences  between  the  actual  and 
the  estimated  degrees  of  delinquency.  Now  if  the  coefficient 
of  the  correlation  existing  between  the  actual  and  the  esti- 
mated values  be  determined,  we  have  in  that  coefficient  a 
measure  of  the  closeness  of  our  approach  to  completeness  of 
analysis.  We  shall  designate  this  special  coefficient  by  the 
symbol  R.  If  the  analysis  is  complete,  R  will  be  equal  to 
one.  Otherwise  it  will  be  less  than  one  and  the  amount  by 
which  it  falls  short  will  indicate  the  importance  of  the  causes 
left  out  of  account. 

Now  in  our  hypothetical  example  R  is  equal  to  -f-  0.873. 
In  other  words,  our  analysis  is  incomplete  even  though  we 
have  taken  into  account  six  other  causes  of  delinquency  as 
highly  correlated  with  delinquency  as  Goring  found  lack  of 
intelligence  to  be.  An  idea  of  the  incompleteness  of  the 
analysis  may  be  gained  from  the  fact  that  the  average  dif- 
ference between  the  actual  and  the  estimated  delinquency 
would  be  half  of  what  this  difference  would  be  if  R  were  zero.1 
Indeed,  if  I  had  not  shunned  the  labor  of  computation,  I 
could  easily  have  taken  twenty  causes  related  to  delinquency 
as  highly  as  our  seven  and  still  have  reached  an  R  unmistak- 

1  R  would  be  zero  only  if  the  coefficients  of  correlation  to  delinquency  of  each  of 
our  seven  "causes"  were  zero.  In  that  case  they  would,  of  course,  not  be  causes  at  all. 
Nevertheless  our  regression  equation  would  still  yield  the  most  reasonable  estimate 
possible  in  the  circumstances  of  the  degree  of  delinquency  of  any  given  individual. 
Having  no  knowledge  at  all  of  the  causes  likely  to  produce  delinquency,  it  would 
be  most  reasonable  to  estimate  the  degree  thereof  as  the  average  degree.  For  example, 
if  one  were  to  estimate  the  height  of  John  Doe,  John  Doe  being  any  individual  what- 
ever about  whom  nothing  at  all  is  known  except  that  he  lives  in  Chicago,  it  would  be 
most  reasonable  to  take  his  probable  height  to  be  the  average  height  of  the  male 
citizens  of  Chicago.  Now  if  we  were  to  estimate  the  degree  of  delinquency  of  each 
and  every  individual  by  means  of  the  regression  equation  based  upon  our  seven  as- 
sumed causes,  our  average  error  would  be  half  as  great  as  if  we  were  to  estimate  that 
degree  of  delinquency  to  be  the  average  degree  of  delinquency  of  the  entire  population. 


156  CURT  ROSENOW 

ably  below  one.  The  truth  of  this  last  statement  can  be 
strongly  suggested  by  showing  how  much  each  additional 
cause  adds  to  the  value  of  R  in  our  hypothetical  example. 
I  have  done  so  in  Table  III. 

TABLE  III 

Rd(i)  =  0.660 

Rd(iXl)  =  0.762 

Rd(ixlx2)  =   O.8O8 

Rd(iXlx2xs)  =   0.835 

Rddx^x.x,)  =   0.852 

Rd(iXlxtxM)  =    0.864 

Rd(ixlXMxbx6)  =   0.873 

The  first  R  is  computed  on  the  basis  of  one  cause  only;  the 
second  on  the  basis  of  two;  the  third  on  the  basis  of  three, 
etc.  It  will  be  seen  that  R  increases  rapidly  at  first  and 
then  more  and  more  slowly.  It  seems  that  a  great  many 
more  causes  would  be  needed  to  reach  a  value  of  one,  if 
indeed  it  can  be  reached  at  all,  for  R  may  be  approaching  a 
limit  of  less  than  one.  That  is,  if  causes  are  intercorrelated 
to  the  degree  which  we  have  assumed  in  our  hypothetical 
example,  it  may  be  impossible  to  reach  completeness  of 
analysis  even  with  an  infinity  of  causal  factors.1 

It  would  be  possible  to  keep  ringing  the  changes  on  the 
various  hypothetical  combinations  of  causal  factors  which 
might  be  formed.  I  trust  what  has  been  done  will  be  enough 
to  validate  our  claims.  Summing  up,  they  are: 

1.  The  claim  that  Goring's  statistics  prove  lack  of  intel- 
ligence to  be  the  chief  cause  of  delinquency,  at  any  rate  until 
better  data  are  at  hand,  is  due  to  a  mistaken  interpretation 
of  his  statistical  results. 

2.  His  results  do  show  that  very  probably  lack  of  intel- 
ligence is  of  less  importance  than  all  other  factors  combined. 

3.  They  show,  also,  that  lack  of  intelligence  is  probably  of 
less  importance  than  one  or  more  other  factors,  taken  singly. 

In  conclusion  I  wish  to  say  that,  in  the  present  paper, 
terms  such  as  intelligence,  delinquency,  etc.,  are  used  un- 

1  Cf.  Pearson,  Biometrika,  Vol.  10,  p.  181. 


INTELLIGENCE  AND  DELINQUENCY  157 

critically  and  naively.  Whatever  definitions  of  these  terms 
may  be  implicit  in  Goring's  data  are  accepted  by  me  without 
question.  For  the  present  paper  addresses  itself  only  in- 
directly to  the  larger  problem  of  the  real  significance  of  the 
causal  factors  of  delinquency,  and  is  concerned  mainly  with 
the  correct  interpretation  of  statistics.  In  the  near  future 
I  hope  to  be  able  to  publish  some  views  on  the  more  important 
psychological  analysis  of  the  factors  which  are  summed  up 
under  such  headings  as  intelligence  and  character,  so  far  as 
they  are  causes  of  delinquency. 


VOL.  27,  No.  3  May,  1920 


THE  PSYCHOLOGICAL  REVIEW 


MANIFOLD   SUB-THEORIES  OF  "THE  TWO 
FACTORS"1 

BY  C.  SPEARMAN 

PRESENT  SITUATION 

Few  competent  judges  would  dispute  that  among  the 
most  unexpected  events  in  the  psychology  of  the  last  dozen 
years  has  been  the  sudden  spring  of  *  general  intelligence' 
from  an  almost  universal  incredulity  to  a  no  less  universal 
investment  with  the  highest  importance.  In  this  movement 
I  venture  to  claim  having  been  among  the  earliest  partici- 
pators. Already  in  1904,  I  went  so  far  as  to  put  forward  an 
explanatory  theory,  namely,  that  of  'Two  Factors.'  2 

The  purport  of  this  theory  is  that  the  cognitive  perform- 
ances of  any  person  depend  upon  :  (a)  a  general  factor  entering 
more  or  less  into  them  all;  and  (b)  a  specific  factor  not  enter- 
ing appreciably  into  any  two,  so  long  as  these  have  a  certain 
quite  moderate  degree  of  unlikeness  to  one  another. 

The  proof  offered  was  that,  on  eliminating  from  any  set 
of  mental  tests  any  that  happened  to  be  very  obviously  like 
others  in  the  same  set,  then  the  intercorrelations  may  still 
remain  large,  but  will  now  admit  of  being  tabulated  in  a 
'hierarchy.'  This  mode  of  describing  the  proof  was  soon 
afterwards  reduced  to  the  exact  mathematical  equation: 


where  a,  b,  p,  and  q  indicate  any  of  the  tests  and  r  is  the 

1  In  this  paper  I  owe  a  double  debt  to  Professor  Nunn:  firstly,  for  stimulating  me 
to  wrife;  and  secondly,  for  pointing  out  to  me  several  serious  obscurities  when  I  had 
done  so. 

1  'General  Intelligence,'  objectively  determined  and  measured,  Amer.  J.  Psychol. 
15,  1904- 

'59 


160  C.  SPEARMAN 

(product  moment)  correlation  between  them.1  This  equation 
was  said,  both  to  hold  good  of  experimental  results,  and  also 
to  prove  the  said  theory.  A  corollary  of  the  equation  is 
that  in  any  table  of  correlations  as  ordinarily  set  out,  every 
column  will  have  a  perfect  correlation  with  every  other  one. 
Thus  the  three  criteria,  the  'hierarchy,'  equation  (A),  and 
a  perfect  intercolumnar  correlation  all  indicate  the  same 
theory. 

Now,  this  theory  has  had  a  curious  fate.  It  was  soon 
backed  up  by  a  seemingly  overwhelming  mass  of  evidence.2 
Above  all,  even  the  data  expressly  brought  forward  to  refute 
it  were  without  any  exception  obliged,  Balaam-like,  to  give 
it  their  complete  support.  In  particular,  a  very  valuable, 
but  certainly  not  friendly,  investigation  of  Simpson  was  shown 
on  more  careful  reexamination  to  fulfill  the  hierarchy  just 
as  exactly  as  all  the  results  obtained  before.3  And  as  for 
any  attempt  at  disproving  this  fulfillment  by  either  the  data 
of  Simpson  or  any  others  that  had  been  adduced,  I  have 
laboriously  searched  the  vast  literature  of  mental  tests  for 
such  in  vain.  In  spite  of  all  this,  mirabile  dictu,  hardly  any 
writer  (outside  of  those  working  in  more  or  less  intimate 
connection  with  myself)  has  so  far  uttered  a  sign  of  being  con- 
vinced! 

Of  the  reasons  that  might  be  alleged  for  this  obduracy, 
some  are  obviously  improbable,  such  as  that  so  many  psy- 
chologists should  be  biased  by  their  preconceived  doctrines, 
or  that  they  would  decline  to  make  themselves  acquainted 
with  the  newer  mathematical  aids  to  research. 

A  more  plausible  explanation  would  be  some  widespread 
belief  that,  although  the  truth  of  the  theory  would  necessitate      , 
the  fulfillment  of  equation   (A),  yet  this  fulfillment  might 
not,  inversely,  necessitate  the  truth  of  the  theory.     But  even 

1  This  equation  was  at  first  expressed  in  a  slightly  different  form,  see  Zeit.  /. 
Psychol.,  1906,  pp.  84-5.     Then  the  form  (A)  was  communicated  by  the  present  writer 

\      to  Mr.  Cyril  Burt,  who  employed  it  in  his  well-known  admirable  paper,  Brit.  J.  Psychol., 
3,  1909- 

2  See  in  particular,  'General  Ability,  its  Existence  and  Nature,'  Brit.  J.  Psychol., 
5,  1912,  and  'The  Heredity  of  Abilities,'  The  Eugenics  Review,  p.  8,  1914. 

3  See  'The  Theory  of  Two  Factors,'  PSYCHOL.  REV.,  21,  1914. 


MANIFOLD  SUB-THEORIES  OF  THE  TWO  FACTORS  161 

this  suggestion  now  fails,  since  a  recent  luminous  paper  by 
Garnett  has  shown  that  also  this  inverse  relation  holds  good.1 
As  his  demonstration  is  rather  long  and  difficult  (but  pro- 
portionately instructive),  the  following  very  simple  one  may 
be  of  service.  It  has  been  used  by  myself  for  many  years, 
but  never  published. 

Let  rxy  denote  the  correlation  between  two  variable  tests, 
x  and  y.     It  can  be  written  as  /(/>),  where  p  is  any  one  of  the 
elements  entering  into  x  and  contributing  to  its  correlationsT  i 
the  remaining  elements  being  regarded  as  parameters.     Simi-  ; 
|  larly,  rxt  may  be  written  as  <j>(q),  wljere  q  is  any  of  the  elements  ' 
entering  into  and  contributing  to  the  correlations  ofyJ    But, 


by  equation  (A), 

f(p)/<t>(q)  =  rxv/rxz  =  constant. 

Hence,  p  and  q  cannot  possibly  be  independent  of  each  other; 
there  can  be  only  one  independent;  and  this  necessary  single- 
ness is  at  once  extensible  to  the  whole  set  of  functions  in 
question. 

"A  HIERARCHY  WITHOUT  A  GENERAL  FACTOR" 
Faced,  then,  on  all  sides  by  this  elusively  silent  'passive 
resistance'  to  the  theory  of  Two  Factors,  it  was  a  great 
pleasure  to  myself,  anxious  to  get  the  matter  settled,  when 
at  last  one  (and  only  one)  writer  did  step  into  the  open  field 
and  challenge  the  above-mentioned  evidence  on  definite 
grounds.  This  was  G.  H.  Thomson,  the  tenor  of  whose 
argument  was  to  admit  that  the  theory  is  proved  whenever 
equation  (A)  is  satisfied  exactly,  but  to  deny  that  it  even 
approaches  being  proved  whenever  (A)  is  only  satisfied  with 
close  approximation.2 

Very  possibly,  indeed,  it  is  just  this  paper  which  has  been 
in  large  measure  responsible  for  the  said  'passive  resistance.' 
This  would  appear  to  be  indicated  by  such  statements  as 
the  following: 

"Thomson  has  shown  in  a  recent  paper  that  Spearman's 

•^     !  'On  Certain  Independent  Factors  in  Mental  Measurements,'  Proc.  Roy.  Soc., 
A,  96,  1919. 

1  'A  Hierarchy  without  a  General  Factor,'  Brit.  J.  Psychol.,  8,  1916. 


i62  C.  SPEARMAN 

method  of  calculation  of  data  which  led  to  his  conclusion  of 
the  existence  of  a  general  intellective  factor  —  a  'general 
ability'  as  against  special  abilities  —  is  open  to  the  gravest 
criticism.  Thomson  attacks  the  concept  on  purely  mathe- 
matical grounds,  but  his  reasoning  would  appear  to  be  un- 
questionably accurate."  l 

As  to  whether  this  final  comment  can  be  accepted  without 
reservation  we  shall  see  shortly.  But  in  any  case  Thomson's 
method  of  proof  is  a  notable  contribution  to  the  subject  and 
will  serve,  I  believe,  to  clear  up  much  obscurity  and  misunder- 
standing. 

He  constructed  tables  of  correlations  artificially,  by  an 
extension  of  the  method  of  Weldon.2  Each  function  —  here 
representing  the  marks  obtained  in  a  single  test  by  a  single 
individual  —  consisted  in  the  total  throw  of  a  set  of  dice.  Of 
course,  there  was  a  separate  throw  made  for  each  individual. 
But  there  was  not  a  completely  separate  throw  for  each  test; 
instead,  some  of  the  dice  were  marked  beforehand  and  their 
resulting  points  were  counted  for  two  or  more  tests  in  common. 
The  result  is  a  correlation  amounting,  as  Weldon  showed,  to 
the  proportion  of  dice  used  in  common;  thus,  if  4  dice  were 
counted  to  two  tests  in  common,  whilst  6  other  dice  were 
thrown  for  each  test  separately,  then  the  correlation  between 
the  two  would  on  a  large  number  of  throws  tend  towards 
4/10  =  .4.  Moreover,  instead  of  going  through  the  tedious 
operation  of  making  the  throws  actually,  the  result  of  an 
infinite  number  of  them  can  easily  be  obtained  theoretically; 
it  is  given  by 


r  =  i/(c  +  m)(c  +  n} 

where  c  is  the  number  of  dice  used  in  common,  while  m  and 

n  are  those  used  each  for  one  only  of  the  two  functions.3 

Proceeding  in  this  manner,  Thomson  constructed  the  fol- 

1  Fernberger,  /.  of  AppL  Psychol.,  x,  p.  197,  1917. 

2  Cited  by  Edgeworth,  Encycl.  Brit.,  loth  ed.,  XXVIII.,  p.  282. 

3  The  equation  at  once  got  from  the  'Correlations  of  Sums  or  Differences,'  Brit.  J. 
Psychol.,  5,  p.  419,  equation  (2).     The  term  on  the  right  hand  becomes: 

e(r  =  I)  +  S(r  =  o)  _ 


2S(r  =  o)  Vc  +  n  +  2S(r  =  o) 


MANIFOLD  SUB-THEORIES  OF  THE  TWO  FACTORS  163 

lowing  arrangement,  in  which  36  of  the  elements  (dice)  'run 
through  more  than  one  test  each,  but  never  through  all.' 

TABLE  I 


I 

• 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

IO 

II 

13 

«3 

'4 

*5 

16 

»7 

18 

1 

(  

X 

X 

X 

x 

X 

x 

X 

X 

d  

x 

X 

x 

x 

X 

X 

X 

t  

x 

x 

X 

x 

X 

X 

/.  . 

X 

X 

X 

X 

x 

x 

X 

h  

x 

X 

X 

k  

T 

T 

z 

/  

X 

X 

X 

»9 

ao 

31 

22 

33 

•4 

»S 

96 

27 

28 

39 

3° 

31 

32 

33 

34 

35 

36 

s 

a  

X 

X 

z 

X 

T 

X 

T 

X 

X 

X 

0 

b  

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

0 

c  

X 

X 

T 

T 

X 

T 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

I 

d  

X 

T 

X 

T 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

3 

e  

x 

T 

X 

X 

X 

X 

q 

/  -• 

X 

T 

T 

X 

'4 

£.  . 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

16 

t. 

X 

X 

T 

20 

k  

X 

X 

X 

22 

/  

X 

X 

X 

24 

In  this  table,  the  heading  numbers  denote  the  dice  thrown, 
while  the  letters  are  the  tests  to  which  they  were  counted. 
Under  the  heading  S,  are  given  the  number  of  throws  counted 
only  to  a  single  test,  namely  that  indicated  by  the  letter  in 
the  same  row. 

Now,  from  this  arrangement  of  the  dice  there  resulted  the 
following  set  of  intercorrelations  of  the  tests  [Table  II.] 

In  this  Table,  he  says,  the  columns  correlate  with  one 

TABLE  II 


a 

i 

c 

d 

e 

/ 

e 

h 

k 

/ 

a  

867 

73° 

593 

356 

174 

167 

120 

116 

112 

b  

867 

6«> 

ceo 

341 

143 

137 

088 

084 

082 

c  

71O 

6i;o 

500 

292 

143 

091 

088 

084 

041 

d  

CQ7 

i^O 

coo 

244 

095 

091 

088 

042 

041 

t  

3VJ 

356 

341 

292 

244 

O93 

089 

043 

041 

040 

/.  . 

174. 

143 

143 

095 

093 

044 

042 

040 

039 

P.  . 

f 
167 

117 

OQI 

091 

089 

044 

040 

039 

037 

t: 

1  20 

088 

088 

088 

043 

042 

040 

037 

036 

k  

116 

084 

084 

042 

O4I 

040 

039 

037 

034 

/  

112 

082 

O4I 

041 

040 

039 

037 

036 

035 

164 


C.  SPEARMAN 


another,  not  indeed  exactly,  but  quite  as  well  as  in  the  cases 
adduced  by  me  on  behalf  of  the  theory  of  a  general  factor, 
and  yet  in  his  arrangement  given  above  there  is  'nothing 
approaching  a  general  factor.'  From  this  he  concludes  that 
the  question  as  to  whether  mental  tests  really  do  demonstrate 
the  existence  of  a  general  factor  will  require  'a  very  much 
more  extensive  set  of  experiments  than  has  yet  been  at- 
tempted.' And  as  he  remarks  that  even  a  thousand  cases 
would  be  insufficient,  the  outlook  for  further  research  would 
appear  to  be  arduous. 

This  demonstration,  unfortunately,  was  brought  forward 
at  a  time  which  to  me  appeared  inopportune  for  scientific 
controversies.  Hence,  my  reply  consisted — unpardonably, 
save  for  the  extraordinary  circumstances — in  a  brief  note, 
not  so  much  giving  my  arguments,  as  indicating  what  general 
lines  they  would  in  due  course  follow.1 

/'  For  one  thing,  it  was  indicated  that  this  new  view  could 
be  shown  not  to  rest  upon  a  solid  foundation  by  the  fact  of 
its  proposing  to  settle  the  point  through  more  extensive 
experiments;  my  note  suggested,  on  the  contrary,  that  not 
even  a  million  cases  could  possibly  produce  a  hierarchy  dis- 
tinguishable from  such  as  could  be  constructed  by  the  new 
method.  This  suggestion  I  will  now  endeavor  to  justify, 
showing  that  by  such  a  method  even  the  most  perfect  hierarchy 
can  be  constructed.  Suppose,  for  instance,  that  we  wanted 
to  get  the  following  tables  of  correlations  between  the  tests  (or 
other  functions)  a,  b,  c,  d,  and  e,  where  the  columns  intercor- 
relate  quite  perfectly  and  equation  (A)  is  satisfied  exactly. 

TABLE  III 


a 

b 

c 

d 

e 

a  

4O 

3° 

20 

10 

b  

4° 

24 

16 

08 

c  

1O 

24 

12 

06 

d  

2O 

16 

12 

04 

e  

IO 

08 

06 

04 

Following  the  new  method  precisely,  we  can  at  once  get  this 
Table  III.  if  we  put  together  our  dice  or  other  elements  in 
the  following  manner  [Table  IV] : 

1  Brit.  J.  Psychol,  8,  1916,  p.  284. 


/v 


MANIFOLD  SUB-THEORIES  OF  THE  TWO  FACTORS 


165 


TABLE  IV 


Dl 

ce 

Tests 

I  tO  90 

si  to 
35 

3610 
47 

48  to 

57 

58  to 
65 

66  to 
7' 

ft  to 
76 

7L'° 

81  to 
83 

84  to 
85 

86  to 
9« 

92  to 
'°5 

106  to 
129 

130  to 

163 

a.    .  . 

X 

X 

X 

X 

b.    .. 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

c  .    .  . 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

d.    .. 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

e.    .  . 

X 

X 

X 

X 

X 

The  above  table  means  that,  for  instance,  the  first  20  dice 
have  entered  into  tests  a  and  b  only;  the  next  15  dice  into 
a  and  c  only;  similarly,  the  others.  Obviously  enough, 
purely  specific  dice  may  be  added  to  any  extent  and  in  any 
manner,  without  disturbing  the  hierarchy  at  all. 

Thus,  the  new  argument  against  the  theory  of  Two  Factors 
proves  too  much.  By  its  results  —  since  the  theory  is  ad- 
mittedly true  when  (A)  is  satisfied  exactly  —  it  comes  to 
suicide. 


THE  DICE  HIERARCHIES  FURNISH  No  EVIDENCE 
But  the  preceding  conclusion  leaves  us  with  a  paradox. 
How  are  we  going  to  explain  the  seeming  fact  that  the  arrange- 
ment given  in  Table  IV.  does  not  assign  any  of  the  dice  to  all 
the  tests,  or  indeed  to  more  than  two?  My  original  note 
asserted  that  Thomson  had,  after  all,  let  in  a  general  factor 
by  a  'back  door.'  Where  is  there  any  such  thing?  And  of 
what  nature  is  the  general  factor  really?  And  of  what 
nature  is  it? 

Moreover,  some  justification  is  needed  for  the  charge  in 
my  note  against  the  dice  arrangements  as  being  "arbitrary." 
We  will  take  this  last  point  first.  Let  Max  and  Mpx  denote 
the  total  marks  obtained  by  the  individual  x  in  the  tests  a 
and  p  respectively,  so  that 

Max    —    AiQt\x  T"  ^12^2*  T"    *  '  '    T~  AmCimx   T~   -fVirj 

and 

r    '  '  •    ~T    *m<Xmx   T   -Rpxi 


where  the  a's  denote  the  elements  (dice)  common  to  any  two 
or  more  qf  all  the  tests  belonging  to  the  domain  in  question, 
any  of  the  ^'s  or  P's  may  be  either  +  I  or  o,  and  the  R's 


1  66  C.  SPEARMAN 

denote  the  sums  of  the  elements  specific  to  the  two  tests 
respectively. 

Let  each  M  and  also  each  a  be  measured  from  its  arith- 
metical mean  for  all  individuals  as  origin;  and  let  the  units  of 
measurement  be  such  that  the  sum  of  the  squares  of  M  for  all 
individuals  is  in  each  test  =  I.  Then,  Ah-Pk-  ^x(ahx  -akx)ln  =  o, 
if  the  elements  h  and  k  are  different;  but  if  they  are  the  same, 
it  may  be  written  as  ^//-/y-S(o:2)/w,  where  S(a2)  is  constant 
for  all  elements.  Hence,  we  get  for  the  correlational  coeffi- 
cient between  a  and  p: 

ra    = 


ap 


.Pi'  +  •  •  •  +  ^«'-/V),  (B) 

Using  analogous  symbols  for  another  test  q,  and  assuming 
the  validity  of  equation  (A),  there  results  immediately: 

A*'  -PI  +  •  •  •  +  Amr-pnr  =  xw-ft'  +  •  •  •  +  Am'Qmf],  (o 

or 

^i'(Pi'  -  X&')  +  •  •  •  +  Am'(Pm'  -  \Qm'}  =  o.       (D) 

Let  us  now,  keeping  the  tests  p  and  q  constant,  allow  a 
to  change  its  constitution.  For  every  variation  of  it  we 
get,  if  (A)  holds  good,  another  equation  of  the  same  form  as 
(D).  But  there  cannot  simultaneously  subsist  a  greater 
number  of  independent  equations  having  that  form  than 
vib  —  I,  where  m*  is  the  number  of  ^'s  having  any  of 
their  coefficients  in  these  equations  not  zero.  Hence,  the 
variation  of  a  satisfying  (A)  are  confined  to  m'  —  I  points, 
and  therefore  cannot  possibly  cover  any  continuous  (or  even 
'dense')  region  at  all,  however  minute;  for  any  such  has  an 
infinity  of  points.  We  cannot  even  take  m'  to  be  very  large, 
for  then  the  luck  of  the  throwing  would  be  equalized  for  the 
different  individuals,  giving  them  all  equal  average  marks,  so 
that  no  correlation  would  be  determinate  at  all.  This  proves 
that,  whatever  import  the  dice  hierarchies  may  possess,  at 
any  rate  they  do  not  touch  the  evidence  arrayed  on  behalf 
of  the  Theory  of  Two  Factors,  for  there  the  test  a  was  by  no 
means  confined  to  a  set  of  selected  points,  but,  in  general, 
varied  at  random.  The  objection  against  arguing  from  values 
selected  arbitrarily  appears,  then,  to  be  substantiated. 


MANIFOLD  SUB-THEORIES  OF  THE  TWO  FACTORS          167 

WHERE  THE  GENERAL  FACTOR  LIES 
But  although  the  dice  hierarchies  are  thus  once  more 
put  out  of  court  as  regards  the  controversial  employment 
attempted,  nevertheless  their  intrinsic  interest  may  well  claim 
for  them  some  further  examination.  In  particular,  we  have 
not  yet  found  out  what  actually  constitutes  the  general 
factor  in  tables  such  as  II.  and  III. 

Now,  for  Max  really  to  consist  of  a  latent  general  factor 
together  with  a  specific  factor  (as  maintained  by  the  theory 
in  question)  it  is  necessary  if  these  factors  are  additive,  and 
it  is  sufficient  in  any  case,  that  we  should  be  able  to  re-write 

Max  aS  Wa'gx  +  Sax  =   «V/*z'g  +  Sax,  (£) 

where  gx  is  some  function  of  the  a's,  g  is  its  mean  value  and 
thus  constant  throughout,  hx  is  constant  for  the  individual  x 
with  all  tests,  wa  is  constant  for  the  test  a  with  all  individuals, 
whilst  Sax  varies  from  individual  to  individual  independently 
of  both  gx  and  SbX  (b  indicating  any  further  test). 

Let  us  see,  then,  whether  and  how  the  above  conditions 
for  g2,  Sax  and  wa  are  fulfilled  by  equation  (A). 

We  require,  first,  r^,^  =  o. 

But  this  coefficient  =  f^^ir^-g^  =  <r0-rao  —  «v<702,  expanding 
by  known  formula1  and  remembering  that 


Hence,  our  condition  will  be  fulfilled  by  rao  =  zua  •<?<,,  which 
we  may  write  as  wa'. 

We  also  want  f^^  =  o.  But  this  equality,  as  we  see 
by  similarly  expanding  r0&  into  «v«v<702  +  att  •  <r,4  •  r(tM),  will 
hold  good  when 

Tab   =   Wa-Wb'ffg*   =   Wa'  'Mb  (F) 

Actually  by  equation  (A\  on  the  other  hand, 


p-rbgyi^rpq-^]     (G) 

for  all  combinations  of  p  and  qj  it  therefore  may  be  written 
as  Va-Vb  and  thus  has  precisely  the  form  required  by  (F). 

1  '  Correlation  of  Sums  or  Differences/  Brit.  J.  Psych.,  V.,  1913,  p.  419. 


1 68  C.  SPEARMAN 

There  only  remains,  then,  to  so  determine  the  function  gx 
that  war  or  rag  =  va.  This  done,  wa  can  at  once  be  taken  as 

Va/ffg- 

Such  a  determination  is  readily  supplied  by  the  sum  of 
the  scores  of  the  individual  x  in  all  the  tests.  For  then, 
expanding  as  before, 

fag"  =  f2(o)(o+6+...+  z) 

=  [i  +  rab  +  •  •  •  +  rax]2l[z  +  2SPOap)  +  2Spa(rpfl)], 
where  p  and  5-  take  all  values  different  from  each  other  and 
from  a,  whilst  z  is  the  number  of  tests, 
=  [(z  -  l)0  -  2)rap-ra_q  +  2(z  -  l)rTp  +  (z  -  i)r*^  +  i] 

-r  [(z  -  i)(z  -  z)r^  +  2(z  -  i)7^  -  i] 
=  Tap-raqlrpq  =  vaz,    again    just    as    required,  (H) 

where  the  scorings  indicate  means  for  all  combinations  of  p 
and  q,  in  the  case  of  the  equation  (A]  holding  good  for  any 
finite  domain  (as  it  actually  does,  according  to  the  empirical 
evidence),  so  that  z  becomes  infinitely  large  and  its  lower 
powers  vanish  in  comparison  with  the  squares. 

Even  in  the  case  of  equation  (A)  applying  only  to  some 
isolated  points,  our  expression  for  gx  remains  an  approxima- 
tion, and  can  easily  be  made  exact  by  appropriately  changing 
the  relative  weights  of  the  a's  entering  into  it. 

On  the  whole,  then,  g  may  be  regarded  as  the  unit  of 
"General  Intelligence,"  hx  indicating  how  much  of  it  is 
possessed  by  the  individual  xt  whilst  wa  shows  what  relative 
scope  for  its  influence  is  afforded  by  the  test  a. 

This  analysis  of  the  general  factor  and  its  properties 
derives  no  little  interest  from  the  fact  that  our  whole  argu- 
ment, although  based  on  the  dice  correlations,  is  at  once 
capable  of  generalization  to  all  product-moment  correlations 
whatever,  merely  by  removing  the  restriction  of  the  A's,  5's, 
etc.,  to  the  values  of  +  I  and  o.  This  follows  readily  if  we 
(with  Bravais  himself)  assume  that  any  of  the  functions  con- 
cerned can  be  represented  with  sufficient  approximation  by 
Taylor's  expansion  to  the  first  differentials.  For  then  we  get, 
using/  as  the  symbol  of  function: 

/(ai,  «2,  •  •  •  a,)  =  Ai-ai  +  A2'af2  +  •  •  •  +  Az-az, 


MANIFOLD  SUB-THEORIES  OF  THE  TWO  FACTORS          169 

where  the  ^'s  are  now  the  first  differential  coefficients  and 
may  have  any  values. 

FORM  OF  EXPRESSION 

There  was  yet  a  fourth  pledge  in  my  original  note,  namely 
to  show  that  the  dice  hierarchies,  besides  re-introducing  the 
general  factor  unnoticed,  did  so  in  a  form  that  was  psycho- 
logically altogether  untenable.1  This  pledge  also,  I  will  now 
try  to  redeem,  but  with  the  qualification  that  such  psycho- 
logical untenability  must  not  be  taken  to  imply  psychological 
lack  of  importance  and  interest. 

If  we  consider  generally  the  form  and  the  fact  of  de- 
pendence, the  difference  between  them  appears  to  be  pro- 
found. As  regards  the  fact,  a  function  contains,  in  general, 
a  determinate  number  of  totally  independent  variable  ele- 
ments; this  number  measures  its  grade  of  freedom,  its 
dimensionality.  But  the  function's  form  of  expression,  on 
the  contrary,  can  introduce  any  number  desired  of  what  may 
be  called  partially  independent  variables.  For  example,  x 
can  always  be  transformed  into  a\x\  +  #2*2  +  •  •  •  +  anxn 
where  #1,  #2)  *«-i  as  also  a\t  a*  >  •  -  an,  may  have  any  values 
whatever,  so  long  as  the  power  is  retained  of  connecting  them 
together  again  by  means  of  the  still  remaining  xn.  The  latter 
need  only  be  made  =  (x  —  atfi  —  ...  —  an-ixn-i)/a.  Or, 
instead  of  introducing  xn  among  the  variables,  some  condition 
imposed  on  them  (as  done  by  equation  A)  can  have  just  the 
same  effect.  Again,  any  function  of  any  two  variables, 
x  and  y,  can  equally  well  be  expressed  as  functions  of  two 
fresh  variables,  for  instance,  of  r  and  8  where  r2  =  x2  +  y2 
and  tan  6  =  y/x;  r  and  6  are  just  as  independent  of  each 
other  as  were  x  and  y. 

In  many  cases,  the  choice  of  form  between  the  infinitely 
numerous  possible  alternatives  is  dictated  merely  by  con- 
venience or  lucidity.  But  in  other  cases,  the  form,  even  if  it 
does  not  positively  state,  at  any  rate  strongly  suggests,  some 
facts.  In  physics,  for  instance,  all  the  units  employed  are 
mathematically  reducible  to  those  of  mass,  length,  and  time. 

1  Brit.  J.  Psychol.,  1916,  8,  p.  284. 


17°  C.  SPEARMAN 

Yet  in  practice,  such  highly  significant  units  are  usually 
employed  as  ' force'  (=  MLT~2),  or  of  'work'  (  =  MZ,2^-2), 
or  even  of  'power'  (=  MLZT~Z).  Here,  whilst  the  number 
of  totally  independent  elements  constitute  the  fundamental 
theory,  the  form  of  expression  implies  a  sub  theory. 

If,  now,  we  look  at  the  properties  of  our  general  factor 
shown  to  be  latent  in  the  dice  hierarchies,  we  see  from  (D) 
that  they  happen  to  be  of  the  class  that  do  imply  facts.  For 
they  are  such  that  any  of  the  a's  entering  into  any  test 
indicated  by  a  can  disappear  when  the  a  passes  to  b  indicating 
another  test,  but  then  some  other  a  is  obliged  to  arise  in  its 
place  in  order  to  keep  the  correlation  with  any  further  test 
b  still  in  accordance  with  equation  (Z)). 

Does  not  this  imply  that,  the  more  the  test  b  resembles 
the  first  test  indicated  by  a,  the  more  it  must  resemble  the 
second  test  so  indicated  however  unlike  the  first  one? 

And  is  not  this  result  absurd?  The  answer  to  both 
questions,  I  think,  must  be  in  the  affirmative,  so  long  as 
the  a's  denote  any  phenomenological  characters  whatever. 
And  by  'common  elements'  psychologists  do,  as  a  matter  of 
fact,  habitually  mean  something  phenomenological.  But  sup- 
pose that,  instead,  we  transcend  the  universe  of  phenomena 
and  take  the  a's  to  denote  portions  of  some  hypothetical 
underlying  'force'  which  is  equally  effective  for  varied  phe- 
nomena. Upon  this  basis,  there  is  no  longer  any  absurdity, 
but  a  necessity,  that  for  any  lost  a,  there  should  always 
become  available  another  one.  With  such  interchangeable 
force,  however,  we  have  arrived  at  neither  more  nor  less 
than  the  hypothesis  of  a  common  fund  of  energy  (and  inci- 
dentally, we  have  in  large  measure  transferred  the  burden 
of  further  propf  from  psychology  to  physiology). 

It  may  be  observed  that  essentially  the  same  position 
reoccurs  in  the  recently  published  view  of  Otis,  according 
to  which  each  test  has  its  own  particular  degree  of  'spread' 
of  elements.1  For  on  this  view,  the  fact  of  test  p  'spreading' 
so  as  to  contain  many  common  elements  with  test  a\  involves 
its  also  'spreading'  so  as  to  contain  many  common  elements 
with  any  other  test  a2. 

1 J.  Educ.  Psychol.,  1918,  9,  p.  345. 


MANIFOLD  SUB-THEORIES  OF  THE  TWO  FACTORS          I71 

Another  form  of  expression  may  perhaps  be  derived  from 
the  very  interesting  work  of  McCall.1  He  finds  that  in 
several  cases  the  intercolumnar  correlations,  far  from  ap- 
proaching to  -f  i.oo,  come  very  nearly  to  the  exact  opposite, 
—  i.oo.  This,  he  urges  is  in  polar  contradiction  to  the 
Theory  of  Two  Factors.  But  such  an  argument  rests  upon 
a  mere  misapprehension  (quite  possibly  due  to  unprecise 
wording  on  my  part) ;  for  it  has  long  been  noticed  by  Webb2 
that  equation  (A}  is  just  as  well  satisfied  by  negative  as  by 
positive  intercolumnar  correlations,  so  long  as  they  approach 
unity.  Moreover,  it  is  even  perfectly  true  to  say  that  the 
intercolumnar  correlation  is  always  +  i.oo,  so  long  as  the 
reservation  is  made  that  the  units  of  measurements  should 
be  chosen  suitably.  By  this  reservation,  the  positive  sign 
can  at  once  be  restored  throughout  the  intercolumnar  corre- 
lations of  both  Webb  and  McCall.  But  even  then,  there 
may  be  indications  of  a  new  and  important  sub  theory. 

Yet  another  instance  of  a  sub  theory  is  in  the  course  of 
being  elaborated  by  the  investigator  already  quoted,  Thom- 
son; this  is  that  of  a  hierarchy  arising  from  "Two  Levels" 
of  mental  process.3  At  present,  his  only  published  evidence 
is  'an  arrangement  actually  arrived  at  in  a  trial':  and  the 
value  of  such  a  single  arbitrarily  selected  case  in  a  statistical 
investigation  seems  to  me,  I  must  admit,  open  to  gravest 
question.  But  when  he  has  supplemented  this  by  a  deter- 
mination of  the  amount  of  intercolumnar  correlation  produced 
by  his  conditions  on  an  average,  and  has  found  that  this 
average  approaches  to  unity — thereby  showing  that  the 
general  factor  has  come  in  once  more — then  his  view  may 
lead  to  very  interesting  developments. 

To  close,  a  word  may  be  allowed  as  regards  my  own 
attitude  towards  all  these  sub  theories.  For  a  long  time, 
I  have  suggested  their  possible  diversity.  And — although 
my  present  preference  may  have  made  itself  manifest — I 

1  Teachers  College,  Columbia  University  Contributions  to  Education,  No.  79, 
1916.  The  very  newness  of  his  results  as  compared  with  those  obtained  by  other 
researches,  however,  must  make  us  demand  a  proportionately  ample  corroboration. 

» 'Character  and  Intelligence,'  Mon.  Suppl.,  Brit.  J.  Psychol.,  1915,  p.  56. 

»  Brit.  J.  Psychol.,  9,  1919,  P-  337  ff. 


172  C.  SPEARMAN 

certainly  never  have  claimed  that  any  considerable  evidence 
has  been  produced  as  yet  (either  by  myself  or  by  any  one  else) 
for  or  against  any  one  of  them.  Nor,  I  am  inclined  to 
think,  will  they  ever  admit  of  absolutely  decisive  evidence, 
since  they  appear  to  involve  hypotheses  incapable  of  more 
than  relative  probability;  these  hypotheses,  like  those 
involved  in  the  theory  of  light,  or  of  electricity,  may  always 
— even  after  a  long  reign  of  acceptance  and  usefulness — be 
suddenly  upset  again. 

But  as  regards  the  fundamental  theory,  I  venture  to 
maintain  that  this  has  now  been  demonstrated  with  finality. 
It  involves  no  hypothesis  whatever,  but  is  a  direct  mathe- 
matical deduction  from  equation  (A).  Nothing  I  can  con- 
ceive will  shake  it,  unless  it  be  detecting  some  flaw  in  the 
mathematical  logic,  or  convicting  all  those  investigators 
whose  work  supports  (A)  of  a  vast  conspiracy.  So  it  would 
seem  as  if  psychologists  have  now  got  definitely  to  accept 
this  Theory  of  Two  Factors;  it  becomes  a  Bed  of  Procrustes, 
into  which  all  our  doctrines  must  somehow  or  other  be  made 
to  fit,  even  though  the  so  doing  may  at  times  involve  a  not 
unpainful  surgical  operation  upon  them. 


GENERAL  VERSUS  GROUP  FACTORS  IN  MENTAL 

ACTIVITIES 

BY  GODFREY  H.  THOMSON 

Armstrong  College,  University  of  Durham 

I.   OBJECTS  OF  THE  PAPER 

The  objects  of  this  paper  are  to  give  a  general  summary,  in 
non-mathematical  language,  of  various  scattered  papers  which 
in  the  writer's  opinion  prove  the  invalidity  of  the  reasoning 
upon  which  Professor  Spearman  has  based  his  Theory  of 
General  Ability,  or  Theory  of  Two  Factors:  to  submit  an 
alternative  theory,  which  may  be  called  the  Sampling  Theory 
of  Ability,  explaining  the  known  facts  of  mental  correlation 
at  least  equally  as  well  as  does  Professor  Spearman's  theory: 
and,  while  admitting  that  the  existence  of  general  ability 
is  still  possible,  though  unproven,  to  give  reasons  in  support 
of  the  greater  probability  of  the  Sampling  Theory.  The 
two  theories  are  not  necessarily  exclusive  of  one  another. 

II.   HISTORICAL 

The  controversy  as  to  whether  ability  in  any  individual 
is  general,  or  specific,  or  in  groups  or  'faculties'  is  a  very  old 
one,  but  for  the  purposes  of  the  present  article  it  is  not 
necessary  to  go  back  prior  to  the  above  mentioned  paper,1 
the  first  of  a  series  in  which  Professor  Spearman  has  developed 
his  Theory  of  General  Ability,  or  Theory  of  Two  Factors,  as 
it  is  alternatively  named. 

Professor  Spearman's  method  in  that  paper  was  to  measure 
a  number  of  mental  abilities,  some  of  them  school  subjects, 
others  artificial  tests,  in  a  number  of  persons,  and  calculate 
the  correlation  coefficients  of  each  of  these  activities  with 
each  of  the  others.  These  correlation  coefficients,  he  then 
noticed,  had  a  certain  relationship  among  themselves,  a  rela- 

1  'General  Intelligence  objectively  determined  and  measured,'  C.  Spearman, 
Amer.  J.  Psycho!.,  1904,  15,  pp.  201-293. 


174  GODFREY  H.   THOMSON 

tionship  which  may  be  called  hierarchical  order,  and  is  ex- 
plained in  detail  in  the  technical  papers  on  the  subject.  He 
saw,  quite  rightly,  that  the  presence  of  a  general  factor 
would  produce  this  hierarchical  order  among  the  coefficients 
and,  reversing  this  argument,  he  concluded  that  the  presence 
of  hierarchical  order  proved  the  existence  of  a  general  factor 

A  number  of  experimental  researches  on  these  lines,  in 
some  of  which  Professor  Spearman  himself  took  part,  fol- 
lowed during  the  next  eight  years,  but  with  very  conflicting 
results,  some  experimenters  finding  the  hierarchical  order 
among  the  coefficients,  others  finding  no  such  order.  Two 
of  the  best  articles  of  this  period  are  those  of  Mr.  Cyril 
Burt,1  who  found  practically  perfect  hierarchical  order,  and 
Dr.  William  Brown,2  who  found  no  trace  of  such  order.  The 
experimental  work  in  each  case  was  psychologically  of  a  high 
degree  of  excellence. 

Things  were  in  this  very  unsatisfactory  state  when  an 
important  article  by  Professor  Spearman,  in  cooperation  with 
Dr.  Bernard  Hart,  appeared  in  I9I2.3  In  this  article  the 
difficulty  of  making  an  unbiased  judgment  as  to  the  presence 
or  absence  of  hierarchical  order  was  recognized,  and  a  form 
of  calculation  was  given  for  obtaining  a  numerical  criterion 
of  the  degree  of  perfection  of  hierarchical  order,  which  criter- 
ion would  be  independent  of  any  bias  on  the  part  of  the 
calculator.  This  criterion  ranges  theoretically  from  zero,  for 
absence  of  hierarchical  order,  to  unity,  for  perfection  of 
hierarchical  order.  But  their  formula  can,  arithmetically, 
exceed  unity. 

The  authors  applied  their  criterion  to  all  the  experimental 
work  available,  work  dating  from  various  periods,  and  repre- 
senting the  researches  of  14  experimenters  on  1,463  men, 
women,  boys,  and  girls.  From  beginning  to  end  the  values 
of  the  criterion  were  positive  and  very  high.  The  mean  was 

1  Cyril  Burt,  'Experimental  Tests  of  General  Intelligence,'  Brit.  J.  Psychol.,  1909, 

3,  pp.  94-177- 

2  William  Brown,  'Some  Experimental  Results  in  the  Correlation  of  Mental 
Abilities,'  Brit.  J.  Psychol.,  1910,  3,  pp.  296-322. 

s 'General  Ability,  its  Existence  and  Nature,'  by  B.  Hart  and  C.  Spearman, 
Brit.  J.  Psychol.,  1912,  5,  pp.  51-84. 


GENERAL  VERSUS  GROUP  FACTORS  IN  MENTAL  ACTIVITIES     175 

almost  complete  unity.  That  is  to  say,  Dr.  Hart  and  Pro- 
fessor Spearman  claimed  that  all  the  data  then  available 
showed  perfect  hierarchical  order  among  the  correlation  coeffi- 
cients, even  the  data  of  workers  like  Dr.  Brown  and  Professor 
Thorndike,  who  had  been  unable  to  detect  any  such  order. 

The  reasons  why  the  hierarchical  order  among  the  correla- 
tion coefficients  was  not  obvious  at  a  glance  were,  according 
to  these  authors,  two.  In  the  first  place,  their  theory  did 
not  entirely  deny  the  presence  of  group  factors  of  narrow 
range,  and  tests  which  were  too  similar  were,  according  to 
them,  to  be  pooled,  before  the  hierarchical  order  would  be- 
come apparent.  Only  in  very  few  cases,  however,  did  they 
find  it  necessary  to  pool  tests  in  the  data  used.  In  the 
second  place,  the  obscuring  of  the  perfect  hierarchical  order 
was,  according  to  them,  due  to  the  fact  that  only  a  small 
sample  of  subjects  is  examined.  For  this  error  allowance  is 
made  in  the  formula  for  calculating  their  criterion. 

Dr.  Hart  and  Professor  Spearman  therefore  considered 
their  'Theory  of  Two  Factors'  proved.  This  theory  con- 
siders ability  in  any  activity  to  be  due  to  two  factors.  One 
of  these  is  a  general  factor,  common  to  all  performances. 
The  other  is  a  specific  factor,  unique  to  that  particular  per- 
formance, or  at  any  rate  extending  only  over  a  very  narrow 
range  including  only  other  very  similar  performances.  "It 
is  not  asserted,"  they  say,  "that  the  general  factor  prevails 
exclusively  in  the  case  of  performances  too  alike,  but  only 
that  when  this  likeness  is  diminished,  or  when  the  resembling 
performances  are  pooled  together,  a  point  is  soon  reached 
where  the  correlations  are  still  of  considerable  magnitude, 
but  now  indicate  no  common  factor  except  the  general  one." 

In  the  same  paper  Dr.  Hart  and  Professor  Spearman 
consider,  and  in  their  opinion  confute,  two  other  theories,  (a) 
the  older  view  of  Professor  Thorndike,  viz.,  a  general  inde- 
pendence of  all  correlations,  and  (b)  Professor  Thorndike's 
newer  view  of  'levels,'  or  the  almost  universal  belief  in 
'types.'  If  the  former  were  true,  their  criterion  would,  they 
consider,  show  an  average  value  of  about  zero:  if  the  latter, 
a  low  minus  value. 


176  GODFREY  H.   THOMSON 

Many  experimental  researches  were  inspired  by  this  paper 
of  Dr.  Hart  and  Professor  Spearman,  of  which,  as  a  good 
example,  may  be  cited  one  in  1913  by  Mr.  Stanley  Wyatt.1 
It  is  I  think  not  too  much  to  say  that  in  practically  all  of 
these  the  application  of  the  Hart  and  Spearman  criterion 
gave  values  closely  approximating  to  unity  and  therefore 
supporting  the  Theory  of  General  Ability.  But  complica- 
tions began  to  arise,  of  which  the  first  of  importance  will  be 
found  in  Dr.  Edward  Webb's  monograph  on  'Character  and 
Intelligence,'  in  191 S-2  Dr.  Webb  considered  that  he  had 
found  (in  addition  to  Professor  Spearman's  General  Ability), 
a  second  general  factor,  which  he  calls  'persistence  of  motives.' 
Other  writers  began  to  find  that  their  data  required  for  their 
explanation  large  group  factors,  of  wider  range  than  those 
contemplated  in  the  original  form  of  Professor  Spearman's 
theory.3  Quite  recently  Mr.  J.  C.  Maxwell  Garnett,  discuss- 
ing the  data  of  a  number  of  workers  with  the  aid  of  mathe- 
matical devices  which  he  has  introduced  for  the  purpose, 
concludes  that  in  addition  to  the  single  general  factor  of 
Professor  Spearman,  there  are  two  large  group  factors  which 
are  practically  general4  (one  of  them  being  indeed  almost 
identical  with  Dr.  Webb's  second  general  factor),  which  he 
calls  respectively  'cleverness'  and  'purpose,'  both  distinct 
from  general  ability. 

It  is  clear  therefore  that  in  any  case  the  simple  original 
form  of  Professor  Spearman's  theory  is  becoming  complicated 
by  additions  which  tend  to  modify  it  very  considerably. 
Meanwhile,  however,  the  present  writer  had  come  to  the 
conclusion  that  the  mathematical  foundations  upon  which  it 
was  based  were  in  fact  incorrect.  Before  developing  the 
line  of  argument  which  led  to  this,  it  will  be  well  to  re-state 
Professor  Spearman's  case  in  its  simplest  terms  in  a  few  words. 

1  Stanley  Wyatt,  'The  Quantitative  Investigation  of  Higher  Mental  Processes/ 
Brit.  J.  Psychol.,  1913,  6,  pp.  109-133. 

2E.  Webb,  'Character  and  Intelligence,'^'/.  /.  Psychol.,  Monog.  Suppl.,  1915, 
3,  pp.  ix  and  99. 

3  See  especially  E.  Carey,  'Factors  in  the  Mental  Processes  of  School  Children, 
Brit,  J.  Psychol.,  1916,  8,  pp.  170-182. 

4J.  C.  Maxwell  Garnett,  'General  Ability,  Cleverness,  and  Purpose,'  Brit.  J. 
Psychol.,  1919,  9,  PP-  345-366- 


GENERAL  VERSUS  GROUP  FACTORS  IN  MENTAL  ACTIVITIES     177 

It  is  entirely  based  upon  the  observation  and  measurement 
of  hierarchical  order  among  correlation  coefficients.  It  states 
that  after  allowance  has  been  made  for  sampling  errors  this 
hierarchical  order  is  found  practically  in  perfection.  And 
it  finally  states  that  such  a  high  degree  of  perfection  can  only 
be  produced  by  a  general  factor,  and  the  absence  of  group 
factors,  which  would  mar  the  perfection. 

III.   THE  CASE  AGAINST  THE  VALIDITY  OF  PROFESSOR 
SPEARMAN'S  ARGUMENT 

It  is  possible,  by  means  of  dice  throws  or  in  other  ways,  to 
make  artificial  experiments  on  correlation,  with  the  immense 
advantage  that  the  machinery  producing  the  correlation  is 
known,  and  that  therefore  conclusions  based  upon  the  correla- 
tion coefficients  can  be  confronted  with  the  facts.  Working 
on  these  lines,  the  present  writer  made,  in  1914,  a  set  of 
imitation  'mental  tests'  (really  dice  throws  of  a  complicated 
kind)  which  were  known  to  contain  no  general  factor.  The 
correlations  were  produced  by  a  number  of  group  factors 
which  were  of  wide  range,  and,  unlike  Professor  Spearman's 
specific  or  narrow  group  factors,  they  were  not  mutually 
exclusive. 

These  imitation  mental  tests,  containing  no  general  factor, 
gave  however  a  set  of  correlation  coefficients  in  excellent 
hierarchical  order,  and  the  criterion  was  when  calculated 
found  to  be  unity,  so  that  had  these  correlation  coefficients 
been  published  as  the  result  of  experimental  work,  they  would 
have  been  claimed  by  Professor  Spearman  as  proving  the 
presence  of  a  general  factor.1 

In  a  short  reply  Professor  Spearman  laid  stress  on  the 
fact  that  this  arrangement  of  group  factors  which  thus  pro- 
duced practically  perfect  hierarchical  order  was  not  a  random 
arrangement,  and  that  it  was  exceedingly  improbable  that 
this  one  special  arrangement  should  have  occurred  in  each 
of  the  psychological  researches  of  many  experimenters,  so 
improbable  indeed  as  to  be  ruled  entirely  out  of  court.2 

1  Godfrey  H.  Thomson,  'A  Hierarchy  without  a  General  Factor,'  Brit.  J.  Psyckol., 
1916,  8,  pp.  271-281. 

1  C.  Spearman,  'Some  Comments  on  Mr.  Thomson's  Paper,'  Brit.  J.  Psychol., 
1916,  8,  p.  282. 


178  GODFREY  H.   THOMSON 

It  is  clear  that  Professor  Spearman  did  therefore  definitely 
admit  that  at  any  rate  one  arrangement  of  group  factors 
existed  which  would  give  hierarchical  order  of  sufficient  perfec- 
tion to  satisfy  completely  his  criterion.  He  did  more  than 
this,  however,  for  he  claimed  already  to  have  published, 
without  proof,  in  an  earlier  paper,  what  the  effect  of  a  really 
random  overlapping  of  all  the  factors  in  his  opinion  is,  namely 
that  in  this  case  his  criterion  will  be  of  the  same  value  as 
the  average  correlation  between  the  tests.1  Now  the  average 
correlation  between  the  tests  employed  in  the  psychological 
researches  under  consideration  is  not  as  a  rule  low.  Indeed 
in  those  tests  which  really  play  an  important  part  in  the 
calculation  of  the  criterion  it  is  usually  very  high.  So  that 
this  criterion  would,  if  Professor  Spearman's  admission  be 
correct,  apparently  be  high  on  the  random  overlap  theory; 
that  is  to  say  sheer  chance  would  produce  considerable  though 
not  perfect  hierarchical  order.  This  already  puts  the  proof 
of  the  Theory  of  General  Ability  into  a  very  different  position 
from  that  which  it  appeared  to  occupy  immediately  after  the 
publication  of  the  paper  of  Dr.  Hart  and  Professor  Spearman 
in  1912.  For  in  that  paper  the  alternative  theories  gave 
values  of  the  criterion  which  were  either  zero  or  negative, 
and  the  fact  that  it  actually  came  out  to  be  almost  unity 
seemed  conclusive.  But  now  the  comparison  is  much  less 
definite,  for  here  is  a  theory  which  may  give  high  positive 
values.  The  criterion  must  not  merely  be  high  and  positive 
to  prove  the  Theory  of  Two  Factors,  it  must  be  absolutely 
unity.  True,  in  Professor  Spearman's  calculations  it  does 
come  to  unity  with  most  remarkable  regularity.  But  if  it 
can  be  shown  that  these  calculations  are  in  any  way  erroneous, 
then  the  fact-  that  the  comparison  is  with  a  theory  which 
can  give  a  high  criterion,  and  not  merely  with  theories  which 
give  zero  or  less,  is  of  great  importance. 

One  reply  which  Professor  Spearman  might  make  to  this 
step  of  the  argument  is  contained  by  implication  in  the 
footnote  on  page  109  of  the  already  quoted  1914  article  in  the 

1  C.  Spearman,  'The  Theory  of  Two  Factors,'  PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1914,  21,  p.  109. 
See  also  E.  Webb,  Character  andlntelligence,'  Brit.  J.  Psychol.  Monog.  SuppL,  1915, 
No.  3,  on  page  57  and  Appendix,  page  82. 


GENERAL  VERSUS  GROUP  FACTORS  IN  MENTAL  ACTIVITIES     iJ9 

PSYCHOLOGICAL  REVIEW.  He  appears  to  think  that  on  the 
random  overlap  theory  the  criterion  and  the  average  correla- 
tion, though  equal,  will  both  be  zero  or  very  small  on  the 
average.  In  other  words,  on  this  view  random  overlap  will 
produce  hierarchical  order  if  it  produces  correlation  at  all, 
but  usually  both  will  be  zero.  To  return  to  the  reply  of 
Professor  Spearman  to  the  *  Hierarchy  without  a  General 
Factor,'  the  reply  namely  that  this  special  arrangement  would 
doubtless  give  such  order,  but  was  too  improbable  to  be 
seriously  considered,  and  that  a  random  arrangement  of  Group 
Factors,  though  it  might  give  some  hierarchical  order,  would 
not  give  it  in  the  perfection  actually  found:  the  obvious  way 
to  find  out  if  this  is  so  or  not  is  to  try  it,  with  artificial '  mental 
tests'  formed  of  dice  throws.  This  the  present  writer  did  in 
November  and  December  of  1918,  after  an  unavoidable  delay 
of  some  years.  Sets  of  artificial  variables  (analogous  to  the 
scores  in  mental  tests)  were  made,  in  each  of  which  the  ar- 
rangement of  group  factors  was  decided  by  the  chance  draws 
of  cards  from  a  pack.1  It  was  found  that  in  every  case  a 
very  considerable  degree  of  perfection  of  hierarchical  order 
was  produced,  quite  as  high  as  that  found  in  the  correlation 
data  of  experimental  psychology.  A  further  test  was  made 
on  that  set  of  data,  from  among  these  artificial  experiments, 
which  appeared  to  yield  the  least  perfect  hierarchical  order. 
The  true  values  of  the  correlation  coefficients  being  known, 
the  true  degree  of  perfection  of  hierarchical  order  could  be 
correctly  calculated,  and  was  0.59  (perfection  being  repre- 
sented by  unity).  Dice  throws  were  now  made  to  obtain 
experimental  values  of  the  same  correlations,  and  Professor 
Spearman's  criterion  applied.  As  it  has  done  in  the  case  of 
so  many  experimental  researches  in  psychology,  it  gave  the 
value  unity.2  This  set  of  correlation  coefficients,  therefore, 
if  it  had  been  published  as  the  result  of  experiments  on  mental 

1  Godfrey  H.  Thomson,  'On  the  Cause  of  Hierarchical  Order  among  the  Correlation 
Coefficients  of  a  Number  of  Varieties  taken  in  Pairs,'  Proceedings  of  the  Royal  Society 
of  London,  1919,  A,  95,  PP-  400-408.  See  also,  by  the  same  author,  'The  Hierarchy  of 
Abilities,'  and  'The  Proof  or  Disproof  of  the  Existence  of  General  Ability,'  in  Brit.  /. 
PsychoL,  1919,  9,  pp.  321-344. 

1  Godfrey  H.  Thomson,  'On  the  Degree  of  Perfection  of  Hierarchical  Order  among 
Correlation  Coefficients,'  Biometrika,  1919,  Vol.  12,  pp.  355-366. 


i8o  GODFREY  H.   THOMSON 

tests,  would  have  been  claimed  by  Professor  Spearman  as 
additional  proof  of  the  existence  of  a  general  factor,  although 
in  fact  there  was  no  such  general  factor  present,  and  the 
correlations  were  due  to  randomly  selected  group  factors. 

The  conclusions  which  appear  reasonable  from  this  are 
(a)  that  hierarchical  order,  unless  perhaps  when  it  is  abso- 
lutely perfect,  is  no  proof  of  the  existence  of  a  general  factor, 
and  (b)  that  the  Hart  and  Spearman  criterion  for  hierarchical 
order  is  somehow  incorrect,  and  exaggerates  the  degree  of 
hierarchical  order  present. 

The  errors  which  cause  this  exaggeration  are  pointed 
out  in  the  last  cited  article  in  Biometrika,  and  are  mainly  two. 
In  the  first  place,  Dr.  Hart  and  Professor  Spearman  assumed 
certain  quantities  to  be  uncorrelated  when  they  are  really 
strongly  correlated,  though  in  a  peculiar  manner.  This  error 
causes  the  possible  values  of  the  criterion  to  be  distributed, 
not  from  zero  to  unity,  but  from  zero  to  infinity.  In  the 
second  place,  they  employ  a  'correctional  standard'  which 
rejects  all  the  values  greater  than  about  i|.  The  possible 
range  for  the  accepted  values  is  in  practice  from  about  ^  to 
i^,  and  their  average  is  naturally  about  unity.  In  other 
words,  the  remarkable  regularity  with  which  this  criterion 
gives  the  value  unity  is  not  a  property  of  the  investigated 
correlation  coefficients  at  all,  but  is  a  property  possessed  by 
the  criterion  itself,  due  to  errors  and  the  action  of  the  'correc- 
tional standard.' 

In  the  writer's  opinion  the  work  outlined  in  this  section 
of  the  present  paper  finally  proves  the  invalidity  of  Professor 
Spearman's  mathematical  argument  in  favor  of  the  Theory 
of  Two  Factors.  If  this  be  so  that  theory  returns  to  the 
status  of  a  possible,  but  unproven,  theory. 

IV.   HIERARCHICAL  ORDER  THE  NATURAL  ORDER  AMONG 

CORRELATION  COEFFICIENTS 

The  fact  is  that  hierarchical  order,  which  Professor  Spear- 
man was  the  first  to  notice  among  correlation  coefficients, 
is  the  natural  relationship  among  these  coefficients,  on  any 
theory  whatever  of  the  cause  of  the  correlations,  excepting 


GENERAL  VERSUS  GROUP  FACTORS  IN  MENTAL  ACTIVITIES     181 

only  theories  specially  designed  to  prevent  its  occurrence. 
It  is  the  absence  of  hierarchical  order  which  would  be  a 
remarkable  phenomenon  requiring  special  explanation;  its 
presence  requires  none  beyond  what  is  termed  chance. 

An  analogy  from  the  simple  repeated  measurements  of  a 
linear  magnitude  may  help  to  illustrate  this.  Indeed  it  is 
rather  more  than  an  analogy,  being  in  fact  the  same  phe- 
nomenon in  its  simplest  terms  and  dimensions.  It  is  well 
known  that  many  measurements  of  the  same  quantity,  made 
with  all  scientific  precautions,  under  apparently  the  same 
conditions,  and  with  an  avoidance  of  all  known  sources  of 
error,  nevertheless  do  not  give  a  number  of  identical  values. 
The  values  are  all  different,  but  are  not  without  law  and  order 
in  their  arrangement.  They  are  grouped  about  a  center  from 
which  the  density  decreases  in  both  directions,  and  it  is  found 
that  this  grouping  is  for  most  practical  purposes  closely 
represented  by  the  Normal  or  Gaussian  Curve  of  Error. 
Experimenters  are  not  surprised  to  find  their  data  obeying 
the  Normal  Law,  nor  do  they  require  a  special  theory  to 
explain  it.  On  the  contrary,  it  is  the  departures  from  the 
Normal  Law  which  if  wide  would  cause  alarm  and  require 
special  investigation,  and  if  confirmed  would  require  a  special 
theory.  In  the  same  way  hierarchical  order  among  correla- 
tion coefficients  should  not  cause  surprise,  though  any  marked 
variation  from  this  order  would  demand  investigation. 

Correlation  coefficients  are  ^themselves  correlated,  and  n 
correlation  coefficients  form  an  n-fold  or  w-dimensional  corre- 
lation-surface. The  particular  and  convenient  form  of  tabu- 
lation of  correlation  coefficients  adopted  by  Professor  Spear- 
man and  followed  by  most  other  psychological  workers  brings 
to  light,  in  the  form  of  "hierarchical  order,"  one  of  the 
properties  of  this  correlation-surface  of  the  correlations. 

It  is  true  that  in  the  ordinary  form  of  the  theory  of  corre- 
lation of  correlations,1  the  variations  in  the  correlation  coeffi- 
cients to  which  the  correlation  of  these  coefficients  refers, 
are  variations  due  to  sampling  the  population;  i.e.,  to  taking 

1  K.  Pearson  and  L.  N.  G.  Filon,  'On  the  Probable  Errors  of  Frequency  Constants 
and  on  the  Influence  of  Random  Selection  on  Variation  and  Correlation,'  Phil.  Trans % 
of  the  Roy.  Soc.  London,  1898,  191  A,  pp.  299-311. 


182  GODFREY  H.   THOMSON 

in  our  case  a  class  of  only  perhaps  50  English  grammar  school 
boys  of  age  12,  instead  of  all  such  boys:  whereas  the  hier- 
archical order  we  desire  to  explain  is  already  found  in  the 
true  'theoretical'  correlation  coefficients.  This  difference  is 
however  one  of  point  of  view  only.  It  was  left  partially  un- 
explained in  the  above  cited  article1  although  it  was  referred 
to.  Further  consideration  leads  to  the  following  resolution 
of  the  difficulty. 

Suppose  that  n  variates  (in  our  work  the  scores  in  mental 
tests)  are  so  connected  by  factors  that  the  correlations  are  all 
equal  and  positive.  Then  let  a  small  sample  of  the  popula- 
tion be  taken.  The  observed  correlations  will  show  departures 
from  equality,  and  will  be  found  to  be  in  hierarchical  order. 
This  hierarchical  order  is  due  to  sampling  the  population. 

Now  consider  why  the  correlations  do  not  come  out  at  their 
true  values.  They  give  of  course  the  true  values  for  the 
sample.  The  reason  of  their  departing  from  the  true  values 
of  the  whole  population  is  that  (a)  some  of  the  factors  which 
really  are  links  between  the  variates  (the  mental  activities) 
happen  to  have  remained  steadier  than  usual  during  the 
sample.  In  the  limit  a  factor  might  happen  to  retain  exactly 
the  same  value  through  the  various  individuals  of  the  sample. 
That  is,  some  of  the  linking  factors  do  not  in  reality  come  into 
action,  or  not  in  their  full  force,  (b)  On  the  other  hand, 
some  factors  which  are  really  different  and  unconnected  may 
happen  by  chance  to  rise  and  fall  together,  throughout  the 
sample,  and  more  or  less  to  act  as  one.  That  is,  fictitious 
linking  factors  are  created,  which  would  disappear  with  a 
larger  sample. 

Clearly  therefore  a  hierarchy  of  correlation  coefficients, 
caused  by  sampling  the  population,  is  due  to  chance  having 
caused  a  change  in  the  apparent  factors  acting.  It  follows 
that  if  we  make  a  real  change  in  the  factors  acting,  we  shall 
get  a  hierarchy,  and  this  is  what  we  do  when  we  choose  the 
mental  tests  to  be  employed  in  any  research.  Each  mental 
test  is  a  test  of  a  sample  of  abilities. 

The  laws  governing  the  correlation  of  correlation  coeffi- 

1  Godfrey  H.  Thomson,  Proc.  Roy.  Soc.  London,  1919,  A,  95,  pp.  407  and  408. 


GENERAL  VERSUS  GROUP  FACTORS  IN  MENTAL  ACTIVITIES     183 

cients  which  vary  because  of  sampling  the  population  can, 
in  fact,  be  applied  without  hesitation  to  the  relationships 
between  'true'  correlations  in  the  whole  of  any  population 
simply  because  any  such  population  is  itself  a  sample.  Eng- 
lish grammar  school  boys  of  12  are  themselves  a  sample  of  a 
larger  boyhood;  the  whole  human  race  indeed  is  a  sample 
of  'what  might  have  been,'  selected  by  the  struggle  for 
survival. 

The  whole  question  clearly  has  philosophical  bearings  on 
the  degree  of  reality  of  causal  connections;  for  on  this  view 
those  chance  links  in  a  small  sample  which  were  a  few  para- 
graphs ago  termed  'fictitious  links,  which  would  disappear 
with  a  larger  sample,'  do  not  differ  except  in  degree  from  the 
'real'  causal  links  which  we  only  term  real  because  they 
persist  throughout  the  largest  sample  with  which  we  are 
acquainted. 

In  another  direction  there  are  connections  with  the  differ- 
ence, which  is  one  of  degree  only,  between  what  is  called 
'partial'  correlation  and  'entire'  correlation.1 

The  conclusion  to  be  drawn  from  this  section  of  the  present 
paper  is  that  hierarchical  order  is  the  natural  order  to  expect 
among  correlation  coefficients,  on  a  theory  of  chance  sampling 
alone,  and  that  therefore,  by  the  principle  of  Occam's  razor, 
its  presence  cannot  be  made  the  criterion  of  the  existence  of 
any  special  form  of  causal  connection,  such  as  is  assumed  in 
the  Theory  of  Two  Factors. 

V.   A  SAMPLING  THEORY  OF  ABILITY 

In  place  therefore  of  the  two  factors  of  that  theory,  one 

general  and  the  other  specific,  the  present  writer  prefers  to 

think  of  a  number  of  factors  at  play  in  the  carrying  out  of 

any  activity  such  as  a  mental  test,  these  factors  being  a 

sample  of  all  those  which  the  individual  has  at  his  command. 

The   first  reason   for  preferring   this   theory   is   that   of 

Occam's  razor.     It  makes  fewer  assumptions  than  does  the 

1  See  Karl  Pearson,  'On  the  Influence  of  Natural  Selection  on  the  Variability 
and  Correlation  of  Organs,'  Phil.  Trans.  Roy.  Soc.  London,  1902,  A,  200,  pp.  1-66. 

Godfrey  H.  Thomson,  'The  Proof  or  Disproof  of  the  Existence  of  General  Ability,' 
Brit.  J.  Psychol.,  1919,  9,  pp.  321-336. 


184  GODFREY  H.   THOMSON 

more  special  form  of  theory.  It  does  not  deny  general 
ability,  for  if  the  samples  are  large  there  will  of  course  be 
factors  common  to  all  activities.  On  the  other  hand  it 
does  not  assert  general  ability,  for  the  samples  may  not  be 
so  large  as  this,  and  no  single  factor  may  occur  in  every 
activity.  If,  moreover,  a  number  of  factors  do  run  through 
the  whole  gamut  of  activities,  forming  a  general  factor, 
this  group  need  not  be  the  same  in  every  individual.  In  other 
words  general  ability,  if  possessed  by  any  individual,  need 
not  be  psychologically  of  the  same  nature  as  any  general 
ability  possessed  by  another  individual.  Everyone  has  prob- 
ably known  men  who  were  good  all  round,  but  Jones  may  be 
a  good  all  round  man  for  different  reasons  from  those  which 
make  Smith  good  all  round. 

The  Sampling  Theory,  then,  neither  denies  nor  asserts 
general  ability,  though  it  says  it  is  unproven.  Nor  does  it 
deny  specific  factors.  On  the  other  hand  it  does  deny  the 
absence  of  group  factors.  It  is  this  absence  of  group  factors 
which  is  in  truth  the  crux  of  Professor  Spearman's  theory, 
which  is  not  so  much  a  theory  of  general  ability,  or  a  theory 
of  two  factors,  as  a  Theory  of  the  Absence  of  Group  Factors. 
And  inasmuch  as  its  own  disciples  have  begun  to  require 
group  factors  to  explain  their  data,  its  distinguishing  mark 
would  appear  in  any  case  to  be  disappearing. 

Such  group  factors  as  are  admitted  by  Professor  Spearman 
are  of  very  narrow  range,  and  are  mutually  exclusive,  that  is 
they  do  not  overlap.  Both  these  points  follow  from  the 
sentence  used  in  the  1912  article  with  Dr.  Hart,  where  it  is 
said  that,  in  the  case  of  performances  too  alike,  'when  this 
likeness  is  diminished,  or  when  the  resembling  performances 
are  pooled  together,  a  point  is  soon  reached  where  the  correla- 
tions are  still  of  considerable  magnitude,  but  now  indicate 
no  common  factor  except  the  general  one.' 

Since  this  point  is  soon  reached,  the  group  factors  must 
be  narrow  in  range.  Since  pooling  a  few  performances  will 
obliterate  any  group  factors,  they  must  be  exclusive  of  one 
another.  For  if  A,  B,  C  and  D  are  four  tests,  in  which  A  and 
B  have  a  group  factor  common  to  them,  and  C  and  D  another, 


GENERAL  VERSUS  GROUP  FACTORS  IN  MENTAL  ACTIVITIES     185 

then  of  course  by  pooling  A  with  B  and  also  C  with  D  we  can 
obtain  two  pools  AB  and  CD  which  have  no  link.  But  if 
A,  B  and  C  have  one  group  factor,  and  C  and  D  have  another 
then  these  group  factors  cannot  be  separated  into  specific 
factors.  In  fact,  a  specific  factor  is  a  separated  group  factor, 
and  Professor  Spearman's  theory  asserts  that  group  factors,  if 
any,  are  separable  and  mutually  exclusive.  This  is  to  the 
present  writer  the  great  stumbling  block  in  the  way  of  the 
acceptance  of  the  Theory  of  Two  Factors,  unless  'specific 
factor'  is  interpreted  in  the  way  suggested  later  in  this 
article. 

It  is  a  fact  which  will  be  admitted  by  most  that  the  same 
activity  is  not  performed  in  the  same  way  by  different  indi- 
viduals, even  though  they  are  equally  expert.  Not  only  are 
specific  factors  therefore  required  by  this  theory  for  every 
separate  activity,  excluding  only  any  which  are  very  closely 
similar;  but  also  specific  factors  of  different  psychological 
natures  are  required  for  each  individual.  Further,  the  same 
individual  does  not  always  perform  the  same  activity  in  the 
same  way.  A  man  using  an  ergograph  will,  as  he  tires,  begin 
to  employ  muscles  other  than  those  naturally  used  at  the 
outset.  When  we  are  returning  from  a  cycle  ride  muscles 
are  used  in  a  different  manner  from  the  style  adopted  at  the 
start,  indeed  sometimes  deliberate  changes  are  made  to  give 
relief.  And  in  the  same  way  a  mental  task  is  performed  by 
different  methods  at  different  times.  Does  this  then  mean  a 
different  specific  factor  for  each  way  of  doing  a  task?  All 
these  difficulties  appear  to  argue  against  the  Theory  of  Two 
Factors,  and  seem  to  the  present  writer  to  be  considerably 
cleared  up  by  the  Sampling  Theory. 

Finally,  the  Sampling  Theory  appears  to  be  in  accordance 
with  a  line  of  thought  which  has  already  proved  fruitful  in 
other  sciences.  Any  individual  is,  on  the  Mendelian  theory, 
a  sample  of  unit  qualities  derived  from  his  parents,  and  of 
these  a  further  sample  is  apparent  and  explicit  in  the  indi- 
vidual, the  balance  being  dormant  but  capable  of  contributing 
to  the  sample  which  is  to  form  his  child.  It  seems  a  natural 
step  further  to  look  upon  any  activity  carried  out  by  this 


1 86  GODFREY  H.   THOMSON 

individual  as  involving  yet  a  further  sample  of  these  quali- 
ties. 

VI.   THE  DIFFICULTY  OF  'TRANSFER  OF  TRAINING' 

Although  Professor  Spearman's  Theory  of  Two  Factors 
has  been  chiefly  based  by  him  on  the  line  of  argument  which, 
it  is  suggested,  has  now  been  proved  invalid,  viz.,  the  'hier- 
archy' argument,  yet  there  is  another  and  powerful  form  of 
reasoning  which  can  be  brought  up  to  its  support,  based 
upon  the  fact  that,  according  to  some  experimenters,  improve- 
ment in  any  activity  due  to  training  does  not  transfer  in  any 
appreciable  amount  to  any  other  activity,  except  to  those 
very  similar  indeed  to  the  trained  activity.  And  even  those 
workers  who  do  not  agree  that  this  is  an  experimental  fact  are 
usually  content  to  take  a  defensive  attitude  and  say  that 
transfer  is  not  disproved.  Few  if  any  will  say  that  it  is 
proved. 

This  certainly  seems  to  point  to  the  absence  of  group 
factors,  and  to  support  Professor  Spearman's  theory,  which 
only  needs  to  add  to  itself  the  assumption  that  the  specific 
factors  are,  while  the  general  factor  is  not,  capable  of  being 
improved  by  training,  to  fit  the  case  admirably.  Of  course, 
if  transfer  really  occurs,  the  argument  proves  the  opposite. 
And  although  psychological  experiment  points  on  the  whole 
to  the  absence  or  the  narrowness  of  transfer,  yet  popular 
opinion  among  business  men,  schoolmasters,  and  others  is  in 
favor  of  transfer  to  a  considerable  extent.  Assuming  no 
transfer,  however,  how  can  the  Sampling  Theory,  with  its 
numerous  group  factors,  explain  this? 

It  is  necessary  to  assume  that  the  group  factors  are  all 
unimprovable  or  only  slightly  improvable  by  training,  though 
they  may  change  with  the  growth  and  development  of  the 
individual.  The  improvement  which  certainly  takes  place 
when  we  practice  any  activity  is  due,  it  may  then  be  assumed, 
not  to  improvement  in  the  elemental  abilities  which  form  the 
sample,  but  to  a  weeding  out,  and  selection  of  these.  The 
sample  alters,  mainly  no  doubt  is  diminished,  though  addi- 
tions are  also  conceivable.  It  becomes  a  more  economical 


GENERAL  VERSUS  GROUP  FACTORS  IN  MENTAL  ACTIVITIES     187 

sample,  and  waste  of  effort  in  using  elements  which  are  un- 
necessary is  avoided.  Improvement  in  any  mental  activity 
may  on  this  view  be  compared  with  improvement  in  a  manual 
dexterity,  in  which  it  is  notorious  that  the  improvement 
consists  largely  in  the  avoidance  of  unnecessary  movements. 

When  another  activity  is  then  attempted,  the  elemental 
factors  are  just  the  same  as  they  would  have  been  had  the 
practice  in  the  first  activity  not  taken  place.  The  new  ac- 
tivity will  be  performed  by  a  new  group  of  factors,  which 
sample  will  as  in  the  first  case  be  in  the  beginning  wasteful 
and  will  include  many  unnecessary  elements.  Transfer  of 
improvement  gained  in  the  first  activity  will  therefore  not 
take  place  except  insofar  as  the  second  activity  is  recognized 
as  a  mere  variant  of  the  original  one,  in  which  case  the  weeding 
out  process  which  has  taken  place  in  the  first  case  may  be 
done  at  the  very  first  attempt,  at  any  rate  to  some  ex- 
tent. 

To  use  another  analogy,  the  improvement  which  takes 
place  when  a  football  team  practices  playing  together  for  a 
series  of  matches  is  due  more  to  team  work  than  to  individual 
improvement.  A  new  team,  even  though  it  contain  a  large 
proportion  of  players  from  the  first  team,  will  not  have  this 
unity  of  action.  There  will  be  little  transfer  of  improve- 
ment. 

According  to  the  view  here  developed,  it  is  the  weeding 
out  of  the  sample  of  elemental  abilities  which  is  specific. 
The  team  work  is  specific,  though  the  players  play  for  several 
clubs.  This  would  appear  to  enable  a  reconciliation  to  be 
affected  between  the  almost  universal  belief  in  'types'  of 
ability  (to  which  Professor  Spearman  refers)  and  the  experi- 
mental facts  concerning  both  correlation  and  transfer.  If 
there  be  a  general  factor  at  all,  it  might  be  the  power  to 
shake  down  rapidly  into  good  team  work,  in  a  word,  educa- 
bility.  But  there  seems  no  objection  to  assuming  that  this, 
instead  of  being  a  general  factor,  is  a  property  of  each  ele- 
mental factor,  varying  from  factor  to  factor. 

To  sum  up  this  section:  if  transfer  of  training  really  does 
not  occur  to  any  great  extent,  then  it  has  to  be  admitted  that 


1 88  GODFREY  H.   THOMSON 

the  Theory  of  Two  Factors  readily  explains  this.  But  the 
Sampling  Theory  can  also  do  so,  in  a  manner  which  is  perhaps 
not  so  easy  to  set  forth,  but  which  nevertheless  appears  to 
the  present  writer  to  be  more  illuminating  and  less  artificial 
than  the  alternative  theory. 

VII.   THE  'FACULTY  FALLACY' 

Since  the  group  factors  spoken  of  in  this  Sampling  Theory 
are,  in  the  fact  that  they  are  supposed  to  come  into  play  in 
many  different  activities,  similar  to  the  banished  'faculties' 
of  the  mind  (though  the  writer  conceives  of  them  as  being 
smaller  units  than  were  those  faculties)  it  is  probably  neces- 
sary to  defend  the  theory  against  the  charge  of  committing 
what  is  known  as  the  'Faculty  Fallacy.'  This  defence  is 
easy.  It  is  only  necessary  to  point  out  (a)  that  a  person  who 
believes  in  'faculties'  or  'types'  or  'levels'  does  not  neces- 
sarily commit  the  above-mentioned  fallacy,  and  (b)  that  any 
charge  of  being  'faculties'  which  may  be  brought  against  the 
group  factors  can  of  course  also  be  brought  against  the  general 
factor. 

The  clearest  account  of  the  faculty  fallacy  known  to  the 
writer  is  given  in  the  older  edition  of  Professor  G.  F.  Stout's 
'Manual':  "An  effect  cannot  be  its  own  cause,  and  cannot, 
therefore,  afford  its  own  explanation.  But  it  is  a  fallacy  of 
not  infrequent  occurrence  to  assign  as  a  cause  what  turns  out 
on  examination  to  be  only  the  effect  itself,  expressed  in 
different  language.  .  .  .  The  classical  instance  of  this  con- 
fusion is  the  answer  of  Moliere's  physician  to  the  question: 
'Why  does  opium  induce  sleep?'  'Opium,'  he  answers,  'pro- 
duces sleep  because  it  has  a  soporific  tendency.": 

Now  it  is  to  be  clearly  noted  that  there  is  no  logical 
objection  to  the  physician  saying  either  that  opium  produces 
sleep,  or  that  it  has  a  soporific  tendency.  All  that  he  must 
avoid  doing  is  to  give  the  one  as  the  cause  of  the  other.  And 
in  a  similar  way  there  is  no  logical  objection  to  anyone  believ- 
ing, on  the  ground  of  experiment,  that  if  a  man  has  a  good 
memory  for  historical  matters  he  will,  as  a  fact,  have  a 
good  memory  for  all  other  matters.  But  if  he  believes  this 


GENERAL  VERSUS  GROUP  FACTORS  IN  MENTAL  ACTIVITIES     189 

without  any  other  ground  than  that  the  name  memory  is 
given  to  these  diverse  activities,  then  indeed  he  is  committing 
the  fallacy  in  question.  Even  if  a  man  uses  the  form  of 
words:  "Robinson  will  be  a  good  man  for  this  post,  because 
he  has  a  good  memory,"  he  is  not  necessarily  committing 
any  logical  fallacy.  He  may  very  well  mean  by  this  short 
statement  something  like  the  following:  "I  have  noticed 
that  a  man  who  remembers  one  class  of  facts  well  is  also 
frequently  good  at  remembering  other  classes  of  facts.  I 
know  that  Robinson  can  remember  such  and  such  things 
easily  and  accurately,  therefore  I  think  it  very  probable  that 
he  will  be  above  the  average  in  this  job,  which  requires  the 
memorizing  of  certain  facts."  And  in  this  there  is  no  fallacy, 
whether  the  conclusion  be  true  or  false. 

The  existence  of  the  group  factors  spoken  of  in  this  paper 
is  deduced  with  more  or  less  probability  from  the  known 
experiments.  Their  existence  is  an  hypothesis  which  explains 
these  facts,  though  it  is  not  the  only  hypothesis  to  do  so. 
If,  as  is  very  probable,  the  language  used  in  any  part  of  this 
paper  is  open  to  an  interpretation  which  would  involve  the 
fallacy,  then  it  can  only  be  said  that  this  is  not  the  interpreta- 
tion which  is  intended. 

VIII.   CONCLUSIONS 

Professor  Spearman's  Theory  of  Two  Factors,  which  as- 
sumes that  ability  in  any  performance  is  due  to  (a)  a  general 
factor  and  (b)  a  specific  factor  (group  factors  being  absent, 
or  at  any  rate  very  narrow  in  range  and  mutually  exclusive) 
is  based  chiefly  on  the  observed  fact  that  correlation  coeffi- 
cients in  psychological  tests  tend  to  fall  into  'hierarchical 
order.'  It  has  been  shown,  however,  that  the  criterion 
adopted  for  evaluating  the  degree  of  perfection  of  hierarchical 
order  present  is  untrustworthy  and  has  led  to  overestimation. 
Such  hierarchical  order  as  is  actually  present  is  in  fact  the 
natural  thing  to  expect,  and  it  is  the  absence  of  such  which 
should  occasion  surprise.  The  proof  of  the  Theory  of  Two 
Factors  which  is  based  on  the  presence  of  hierarchical  order 
therefore  falls  to  the  ground.  The  theory  remains  a  possible 


190  GODFREY  H.   THOMSON 

explanation  of  the  facts  but  ceases  to  be  the  unique  explana- 
tion. As  an  alternative  theory  there  is  here  advanced  a 
Sampling  Theory  of  Ability,  in  which  any  performance  is 
considered  as  being  carried  out  by  a  sample  of  group  factors. 
This  theory  is  preferred  because  it  makes  fewer  and  less 
special  assumptions,  because  it  is  more  elastic  and  wider,  and 
because  it  is  in  closer  accord  with  theories  in  use  in  biology 
and  in  the  study  of  heredity. 


SUGGESTIONS  TOWARD  A  SCIENTIFIC  INTER- 
PRETATION OF  PERCEPTION 

BY  J.  R.  KANTOR 

University  of  Chicago 

Much  of  the  criticism  directed  toward  the  results  of  psycho- 
logical investigation  might  serve  as  a  direct  challenge  to  psy- 
chologists to  clarify  their  interpretations  of  psychological 
phenomena;  for  a  study  of  those  criticisms  amply  reveals  the 
bizarre  views  attributed  to  psychologists.  Although  this  pe- 
culiar situation  obtains  with  respect  to  all  psychological 
descriptions,  it  is  especially  striking  in  the  case  of  per- 
ception. Thus,  a  recent  writer1  finds  it  necessary  to  point 
out  that  an  object  is  not  merely  a  thing  which  'starts  a  chain 
of  vibrations  which  eventually  results  in  its  own  creation.' 
To  the  present  writer  this  specific  criticism  does  not  really  call 
for  a  defense  of  the  psychologist's  position,  since  the  critic 
holds  substantially  the  same  view  as  most  psychologists,  but 
the  very  fact  that  a  writer  will  find  much  to  criticize  in  any 
one  who  supports  a  similar  doctrine  is  a  symptom  of  a  confusing 
situation  which  demands  at  least  a  restatement  of  perception. 

Naturally  enough  the  confusions  mentioned  reach  deeper 
than  the  mere  matter  of  exposition  and  in  fact  arise  directly 
from  the  types  of  conceptions  held  concerning  the  process  under 
discussion.  A  careful  reading  of  psychological  literature  on 
perception  creates  the  suspicion  that  the  descriptions  fail  to 
tally  with  the  actual  facts  in  the  case.  As  a  striking  example 
we  find  that  perception  is  described  as  in  some  sense  a  creative 
process  which  functions  in  the  organization  of  the  discrete 
qualities  constituting  the  objects  of  our  reaction.  In  effect, 
we  find  practically  all  current  perceptual  doctrines  very 
strongly  reminiscent  of  Berkeley's  subjectivism  albeit  modified 
somewhat  a  la  Reid;  the  latter  modification  results  in  the 
view  that  there  exists  a  percept  as  well  as  an  object  of  percep- 

1  J.  B.  Pratt,  /.  of  Phil.,  Psychol.,  etc.,  1919,  16,  596  ff. 


I92  /.  #•  KAN  TOR 

tion.  Psychologists  cannot  but  consider  the  problem  of  per- 
ception as  crucial,  since  the  admission  of  a  non-scientific  sub- 
jectivism at  this  point  will  bring  disastrous  consequences  into 
the  entire  science  of  psychology.  In  this  article  the  writer 
attempts  to  suggest  a  description  of  perception,  which,  so  far 
as  it  goes,  consistently  complies  with  the  rigorous  canons  of 
natural  science. 

I. 

General  Description  of  Perception. — Perception  is  the  con- 
scious behavior  through  which  are  developed  the  meanings  of 
objects  and  relations  which  operate  in  the  adaptation  of  the 
individual  to  his  surroundings  and  in  the  control  of  them.  It  is 
precisely  in  the  process  of  perception  that  the  individual,  in 
direct  contact  with  objects,  develops  reaction  patterns  enabling 
him  to  differentiate  and  distinguish  the  various  objects  affecting 
him. 

At  the  outset  it  must  be  noted  that  the  act  of  perception1 
is  an  adjustmental  reaction,  an  actual  interaction  of  one  natural 
object  with  another.  But  the  precise  difference  between  this 
kind  of  interaction  and  some  other  is,  namely,  that  one  of  the 
interacting  objects  is  a  psychophysiological  organism  to  whom 
the  results  of  the  present  interaction  will  become  significant 
in  influencing  future  contacts  of  this  object  (person)  with  the 
same  or  a  similar  object.  Consider,  that  what  was  formerly 
a  mere  interconnection  between  objects  becomes  what  we 
might  now  call  a  knowledge  process  because  the  reaction 
becomes  a  means  to  some  other  form  of  reaction;  that  is  to 
say,  the  first  natural  contact  with  an  object  is  the  basis  for 
the  development  of  an  anticipatory  reaction  system.  If  the 
person  is  once  burned,  the  object  which  produces  this  effect 
will  upon  a  future  occasion  stimulate  a  touch  inhibition  reaction 
rather  than  a  touch  response.  An  empirical  fact  it  is,  there- 

1  While  the  writer  is  in  complete  sympathy  with  Watson  in  his  revolt  against 
subjectivism,  and  in  his  assertion  that  functional  psychology  is  just  as  guilty  in  this 
respect  as  the  structural  view,  he  cannot  assent  to  Watson's  implication  that  perception 
among  other  processes  is  not  properly  the  subject  matter  of  a  non-subjectivistic 
psychology.  Nor  indeed  does  Watson  omit  perception  when  he  is  interested  in 
4  integrations  and  total  activities  of  the  individual.'  His  rejection  of  the  terms  is 
obviously  to  allow  room  for  a  predominantly  physiological  tone  to  his  discussion. 


SCIENTIFIC  INTERPRETATION  OF  PERCEPTION  193 

fore,  that  all  developed1  perceptual  responses  operate  as  knowl- 
edge reactions,  for  in  this  way  only  do  we  learn  to  discriminate 
between  objects,  and  to  anticipate  the  specific  response  we 
should  make  to  a  particular  object.  But  it  is  of  extreme 
importance  to  notice  that  the  perceptual  reaction  is  not  in  its 
primary  occurrence  a  knowing.  To  overlook  this  fact  is  to 
fall  into  the  error  of  finally  resolving  the  objects  of  our  reactions 
into  knowledges  of  some  sort,  and  the  history  of  psychology 
stands  to  witness  that  on  the  basis  of  such  premises  we  in- 
variably land  in  a  mentalistic  world  in  which  objects  are 
reduced  to  sensations,  and  the  world  of  fact  and  science 
disappears  in  our  description. 

Only  upon  the  assumption  that  the  perceptual  reaction  is  a 
natural  psychophysiological  response,  the  writer  submits,  can 
we  achieve  a  natural  science  interpretation  of  the  development 
of  discriminative  meanings.  By  thus  investigating  all  the 
components  of  an  act  we  may  hope  to  obtain  a  scientific 
description  of  the  total  response  and  escape  the  arbitrary  and 
confusing  concept  of  a  mental  content,  which  is  an  unavoidable 
consequence  of  the  presupposition  that  perception  is  a  knowl- 
edge process.2 

We  must,  then,  look  upon  the  perceptual  reaction  as  a 
complex  adjustment  from  which  is  derived  the  significance  of 
objects  through  the  integration  of  reaction  patterns.  This 
meaning  of  objects  we  shall  see  may  be  resident  in  the  response 
pattern,  or  it  may  be  more  remotely  connected  with  it,  even 
to  the  point  at  which  the  act  is  no  longer  a  perceptual  but  a 
conceptual  reaction;  in  the  latter  case  we  observe  that  the 
meaning  is  detached  from  any  overt  act,  and  as  a  matter  of 
fact  we  find  that  such  detached  meanings  constitute  the  im- 
plicit functioning  of  the  original  reaction  which  ultimately 
generated  the  conceptual  meaning. 

Primary  Perception  and  Simple  Apprehension. — Upon  the 
basis  of  the  specific  operation  of  meanings  we  may  distinguish 
two  definite  forms  or  degrees  of  perceptual  response  which  we 

1  Note  the  distinction  drawn  between  perception  in  development  and  perception 
in  use  on  another  page  of  this  paper. 

1  Expressed  in  the  statement  that  perception  is  the  consciousness  (awareness) 
of  an  object  present  to  sense. 


194  /•  R-  KAN  TOR 

will  call  primary  perception  and  simple  apprehension.  In  the 
former  case,  the  meaning  of  the  object  responded  to  resides 
within  the  reactional  movement  of  the  person,1  as  illustrated 
by  the  perceptual  process  of  an  instinctive  act.  The  meaning 
of  a  'danger'  object  for  the  person  is  merely  the  startled  jump 
which  constitutes  the  operation  of  a  connate  reaction  pattern. 
It  must  be  observed  that  in  this  situation  the  neuro-muscular 
and  neuro-glandular  factors  in  the  response  are  very  prominent, 
and  as  a  record  of  fact,  the  cognitive  component  merely  consists 
of  a  simple  appreciation  of  the  presence  of  the  stimulating 
object.2 

In  simple  apprehension  the  meaning  becomes  more  and 
more  detached  from  the  immediate  condition  of  response. 
Instead  of  the  mere  presence  of  an  object  calling  out  a  specific 
reaction,  the  object  may  serve  as  a  symbol  for  some  action. 
In  consequence,  the  discriminated  significance  of  the  object 
will  be  attached  not  to  the  direct  movement  as  in  primary 
perception,  but  to  another  response  which  is  to  follow.  Evi- 
dent it  is  that  a  meaning  of  this  type  is  an  implicit  response 
in  the  form  of  an  anticipatory  process  similar  to  that  we  in- 
variably find  as  an  important  factor  in  all  delayed  responses, 
whether  simple  acts  or  chains  of  acts.  This  capacity  to  detach 
meanings  gives  the  person  a  greater  control  over  the  objects 
of  his  environment,  for,  if  the  meaning  of  the  object  is  appre- 
ciated before  an  overt  response  is  made,  the  type  of  response 
can  be  widely  varied  between  limits.3  In  contrast  to  primary 
perception  the  meaning  in  simple  apprehension  is  always  cor- 
related with  an  awareness-attention  process. 

Implicit  perception  functions  in  adaptational  situations  in 
which  there  are  more  definite  appreciations  of  the  surrounding 
objects.  We,  might  take  the  case  of  meeting  a  friend  in  which 
there  is  a  complete  and  definite  meaning  element.  Conse- 
quently the  overt  action  which  takes  place  is  more  conditioned 

1  We  might  just  as  well  say  the  meaning  is  in  the  object,  but  it  is  clear  that  unless 
there  is  an  action  involved  the  problem  even  of  the  location  of  meaning  does  not  arise. 

2  The  components  spoken  of  are,  of  course,  abstracted  from  the  actual  response  by 
logical  analysis. 

3  Cf.  my  brief  suggestion  concerning  the  detachment  of  meanings,  PSYCHOL.  REV., 
1919,  26,  2  ff. 


SCIENTIFIC  INTERPRETATION  OF  PERCEPTION  *95 

by  the  meaning  component.  If  he  is  an  American  friend,  I 
may  merely  shake  hands  with  him,  but  if  he  is  a  foreigner,  I 
will  probably  also  raise  my  hat  and  bow.  Clearly  the  entire 
course  of  my  behavior  in  this  situation  presupposes  my 
familiarity  with  the  person.  It  must  not  be  overlooked  that 
we  do  not  exclude  from  our  description  of  simple  apprehension 
the  simpler  immediate  reactions  which  occur  in  primary  per- 
ception. For  the  fact  is,  that  since  simple  apprehension  is 
always  the  development  of  an  act  of  primary  perception,  it 
involves  therefore  an  integration  of  the  simpler  acts.  Of  prime 
importance  here  is  the  fact  that  it  is  precisely  through  the 
integration  of  the  simpler  acts  that  a  person  profits  by  past 
experience.  For  instance,  my  reaction  to  this  person  is  condi- 
tioned by  the  numerous  integrations  of  responses  representing 
my  previous  contacts  with  him. 

Thus  through  the  constant  growth  of  the  reaction  pattern 
does  the  perceptual  process  undergo  a  continuous  development. 
Not  only  does  a  given  response  serve  at  any  specific  time  as 
an  adaptational  function,  but  also  as  a  developing  potentiality 
for  some  future  contact  between  the  person  and  the  object. 

Analytic  Description  of  Perception. — Although  the  percep- 
tual response  is  a  thoroughly  organic  process,  we  can  never- 
theless analyze  it  into  a  series  of  specific  stages  or  act  com- 
ponents which  we  can  tabulate  as  follows: 

1.  The  attention  function  in  correlation  with  contact  media 

(light  rays,  for  example). 

2.  Functioning  of  a  reaction  pattern  which  involves 

(a)  Discrimination  and  appreciation  of  specific  qualities 
and  relations  of  objects  coupled  with  conative  and 
affective  factors. 

(b)  Neuro-musculo-glandular  processes. 

3.  Emergence  of  meaning  (new). 

4.  Overt  adaptation  follows. 

i.  The  attention  factor  is  the  selective  process  which  serves 
to  prepare  the  individual  for  a  new  reaction.  At  any  moment 
of  time  innumerable  possibilities  for  action  naturally  exist 
because  of  the  previous  acquisition  of  many  reaction  systems. 
The  change  in  the  surrounding  medium  or  media  of  the  person, 


I96  /.  R*  KANTOR 

which  occurs  when  the  individual  comes  into  the  presence  of 
new  objects,  or  when  objects  change  their  positions  with  respect 
to  the  person,  puts  him  into  a  condition  of  readiness  to  react 
to  some  new  object.  It  must  be  observed  that  the  attention 
processes  depend  not  only  upon  the  stimulating  object  and 
its  setting,  but  also  upon  the  condition  of  the  organism  at  the 
time,  that  is  to  say,  the  selection  process  depends  very  directly 
upon  what  the  activities  of  the  person  were  prior  to  the  present 
contact.  Such  activities  condition  also  what  precise  phase  of 
an  object  we  will  react  to  at  a  given  time.  Thus,  for  example, 
the  problem  as  to  why  at  one  time  our  attention  is  attracted 
to  a  red  solid  instead  of  a  smooth  surface,  when  both  form  the 
phases  of  a  book,  is  solved  by  an  investigation  of  the  previous 
activities  of  the  person. 

2.  Following  the  selection  function,  the  reaction  pattern 
is  brought  into  activity,  and  we  find  thus  a  highly  coordinated 
series  of  processes  taking  place.     These  may  be  enumerated 
separately,  although  they  constitute  merely  descriptive  phases 
of  a  unitary  process.     Here  we  find  the  discriminative  process 
which  enables  the  organism  to  distinguish  the  various  qualities 
and  relations  of  things.     This  phase  may  be  thought  of  as  the 
cognitive  aspect  of  the  reaction  system,  and  to  a  degree  we 
may  look  upon  this  phase  as  conditioning  the  mode  of  operation 
of  the  entire  complex.     The  conative  factor  in  this  complex, 
being  very  closely  connected  with  the  attention  function,  may 
be  considered  as  the  aspect  which  conditions  the  occurrence 
of  a  response  at  all.     Of  primary  importance  are  the  affective 
processes,  which  in  part  predispose  the  organism  to  act.     Every 
reaction  pattern  involves  of  course  also  the  elaborate  function- 
ing of  musculo-neural  and  neuro-glandular  processes,  which 
are  so  prominent  as  to  convince  some  observers  that  they 
constitute  the  total  reaction  pattern. 

3.  As  a  result  of  the  operation  of  the  reaction  pattern  a 
new  effect  is  or  may  be  produced  upon  the  organism.     Should 
the  object  or  person  reacted  to,  with  all  the  involved  relations, 
remain  constant,  no  new  reaction  is  called  out;    that  is,  the 
previously   developed    reaction    pattern    remains    unmodified 
despite  the  present  contact.     The  object,  then,  will  not  take 


SCIENTIFIC  INTERPRETATION  OF  PERCEPTION 

on  any  new  meaning  and  the  overt  act  following  the  apprecia- 
tion of  the  identity  of  the  object  may  be  precisely  like  one  that 
has  previously  occurred.  We  can  readily  determine  this  to 
be  the  case  of  perception  in  use.  On  the  other  hand,  should 
the  previously  developed  reaction  system  prove  inadequate 
for  the  purpose  of  the  present  contact,  new  features  may 
develop.  Instead  of  involving  some  given  system  of  receptors 
in  connection  with  certain  neural  and  muscular  processes, 
additional  factors  may  be  put  into  operation.  Thus,  for 
example,  should  the  apple  previously  sound  and  firm  to  touch 
now  offer  no  resistance,  it  will  call  out  different  muscular 
responses.  Similarly,  should  it  now  present  color  surfaces 
varying  in  hue,  turning  from  red  to  brown,  the  object  will 
take  on  new  meaning,  and  we  will  react  in  a  different  way  to 
the  now  deterioriated  apple.  Thus,  indefinitely  many  modi- 
fications are  developed  in  the  course  of  the  exercise  of  so 
intricate  a  psychophysiological  response  pattern. 

4.  Following  upon  the  operation  of  the  definitively  per- 
ceptual reaction  system,  the  person  performs  some  sort  of 
overt  act.  •The  latter  is  directly  conditioned  by  the  emergence 
of  the  meaning  brought  out  through  the  course  of  the  specified 
contact  with  the  object.  It  must  be  observed  that  the  specific 
perceptual  process  is  a  coordinate  process  with  some  other 
type  of  reaction  system.  Thus,  we  should  look  upon  the 
perceptual  function  as  a  part  of  a  perceptual-instinct,  per- 
ceptual-emotional, or  perceptual-voluntary  action,  etc.  To 
look  upon  it  in  this  way  obviates  the  dangerous  view  that  in 
the  actions  mentioned  we  have  isolated  activities.  As  a  pre- 
liminary or  partial  action  the  perceptual  process  represents  an 
evaluation  of  the  object  which  leads  to  a  definite  overt  response. 
It  is  at  this  point  that  the  perceptual  reaction  becomes  a 
knowledge  function,  since  it  stands  for  some  actual  adjust- 
mental  act.  Whether  the  apple  of  our  illustration  will  be 
eaten,  or  thrown  away,  depends  upon  the  information  elicited 
through  the  operation  of  the  perceptual  reaction  system  and 
its  modifications.  At  this  point,  we  must  not  overlook  the 
fact  that  the  appreciation  of  an  edible  or  non-edible  meaning 
depends  upon  the  surrounding  conditions  of  the  object.  Even 


I98  J.  R.  KANTOR 

if  the  knowledge  elicited  from  the  object  itself  is  favorable  to 
its  consumption,  that  event  will  not  occur  unless  conditions 
are  otherwise  favorable.  We  mean  to  point  out  here  that  the 
specific  kind  of  response  patterns  that  will  act  as  a  series  in 
any  given  situation  will  depend  upon  that  situation.  This 
fact  indicates  the  close  interaction  between  stimuli  and  re- 
sponses. 

An  important  reservation  to  the  above  description  of  the 
perceptual  activities  must  be  made  in  the  light  of  our  distinc- 
tion between  primary  perception  and  simple  apprehension. 
It  is  only  in  the  case  of  simple  apprehension  that  the  distinct 
series  of  factors  are  found;  for  it  is  only  there  that  a  definite 
meaning  factor  is  isolated  in  the  total  act.  In  primary  per- 
ception the  overt  act  is  identical  with  the  original  system,  and 
the  perceptual  process  itself  constitutes  not  exclusively  a 
definite  knowledge  factor  in  an  adjustment,  but  it  is  the  whole 
adjustment  itself. 

Perception  in  Development  and  Use. — Of  primary  importance 
for  the  understanding  of  the  perceptual  reactions  is  the  dis- 
tinction between  perception  in  development,  and  in  use.  In 
the  former  type  of  reaction  with  objects  meanings  are  de- 
veloped; that  is  to  say,  a  definite  form  of  reaction  pattern  is 
acquired;  so  that  the  future  contact  with  this  object  will  be 
of  a  definite  and  peculiar  sort,  because  the  reaction  pattern 
developed  will  then  be  put  into  use.  The  distinction  made 
indicates  the  extremely  complex  and  constantly  varying  char- 
acter of  the  perceptual  reactions  and  points  to  the  mechanism 
of  elaboration  of  such  functions. 

Since  clearly  the  original  perceptual  contacts  with  objects 
occur  in  the  instinct  stage  of  development,  we  may  date  the 
origin  of  a  meaning  or  reaction  pattern  from  the  first  instinct 
contact  of  an  organism  with  any  given  object.  The  point  is, 
that  the  hypothetical,  original  contact  of  an  organism  with 
an  object  is  the  result  of  a  direct  arousal  of  a  connate  reaction 
pattern  through  the  instrumentality  of  various  physical  media 
such  as  light  rays  or  air  waves.  If  we  dare  speak  of  a  meaning 
possessed  by  an  object  at  this  stage,  it  is  merely  that  of  're- 
sponse eliciter.'  This  contact  is  as  mechanical  as  a  conscious 


SCIENTIFIC  INTERPRETATION  OF  PERCEPTION  »99 

behavior  act  can  be,  and  here  we  find  the  full  significance  of  the 
statement  that  we  have  innate  tendencies  to  discriminate  colors 
and  other  physical  qualities.  The  fact  is  that  our  connate 
reaction  patterns  are  brought  into  function  by  the  stimulation 
of  the  specific  receptor  systems  whose  activities  form  a  part 
of  them.  At  this  stage  the  simple  psychophysiological  response 
as  a  whole,  symbolizes  the  meaning  of  the  object.  Now, 
when  the  action  just  mentioned  occurs,  some  effect  will  be 
produced  upon  the  organism;  so  that  the  next  contact  with 
this  object  will  involve  a  modified  reaction  system,  or  we  might 
say,  the  object  has  taken  on  a  new  meaning.  The  perceptual 
processes  thus  represent  a  constant  integration  of  a  reaction 
pattern  depending  upon  the  number  of  contacts  with  the  same 
physical  object  under  varying  conditions  of  surrounding  aus- 
pices. In  general,  it  is  clear  that  the  perceptual  reactions  are 
entirely  genetic  in  their  functioning,  hence  only  by  studying 
them  in  their  development  can  we  hope  to  understand  them. 
Another  form  of  integration  in  the  development  of  per- 
ceptual reactions  is  the  establishment  of  a  definite  interactional 
relationship  between  the  stimulating  object  and  the  reaction 
system.  Not  only  must  there  be  a  coordination  of  specific 
factors  of  a  response  system,  such  as  for  example,  visuo- 
muscular,  visuo-glandular  and  neuro-muscular  processes,  but 
there  must  also  be  a  connection  between  this  total  reaction 
pattern  as  a  functional  representative  of  the  organism  at  the 
time  and  the  stimulating  object.1  Just  how  this  intimate 
relationship  between  stimuli  and  response  systems,  which  is 
the  essential  factor  in  perception  in  use,  is  established,  can  be 
experimentally  studied  through  various  types  of  conditioned 
reflexes.  Excellently  is  perception  in  use  illustrated  by  the 
story  of  the  discharged  veteran,  quoted  by  Spencer,  who  had 
had  the  auditory  object  *  attention'  so  integrated  with  a  par- 
ticular response  system  as  to  lose  his  pie  when  a  practical 
joker  uttered  the  command.2  When  the  integration  has  been 
accomplished,  the  reaction  pattern  can  be  stimulated  by  one  or 
more  of  a  large  series  of  phases  of  the  object,  which  become 

1  This  connection  between  the  response  pattern  and  its  simulating  object  consti- 
tutes the  primary  and  fundamental  type  of  psychological  association. 
''Psychology,'  i,  p.  499. 


200  /.  R.  KANTOR 

differentiated  because  of  the  different  media  through  which  the 
contacts  between  the  organism  and  the  objects  are  made. 
Thus,  a  reaction  pattern  involving  a  ball-meaning  may  be  put 
into  action  by  either  a  visual,  auditory  or  tactual  stimulus. 
As  an  illustration  of  the  arousal  of  a  complex  system  of  per- 
ceptual responses  through  the  mediation  of  a  simple  type  of 
stimulus,  we  can  take  the  case  of  the  visual  contact  with  ice, 
which  arouses  coldness,  smoothness  and  hardness  meanings 
at  the  same  time.  The  effective  adaptation  of  the  organism 
depends  to  a  considerable  degree  upon  the  complexity  of  the 
two  sorts  of  integration  described. 

Because  perception  in  use  as  just  described  involves  putting 
a  complex  reaction  pattern  into  operation  by  .some  phase  of  an 
object,  we  find  in  such  adjustments  the  beginnings  of  a  dif- 
ferentiation between  the  explicit  and  the  implicit  functioning 
of  a  reaction  system;  the  latter  case  gives  us  the  detached 
meaning.  The  implicit  functioning  of  a  reaction  pattern  is 
clearly  discerned  in  the  many  cases  in  which  the  visual  contact 
is  the  only  direct  one;  and  the  meaning  of  the  object,  which 
may  be  very  elaborate,  though  not  attached  directly  to  an 
immediate  response,  is  most  certainly  acting.  A  striking  ex- 
ample of  the  implicit  functioning  of  reaction  patterns  is  the 
situation  in  which  a  banker,  while  otherwise  preoccupied,  for 
a  moment  will  begin  to  respond  as  though  at  a  director's 
meeting,  when  stimulated  by  the  crumpling  of  a  crisp  paper. 
Again,  the  'wave  of  feeling'  brought  on  by  the  perusal  of  a 
literary  description  indicates  the  living  over  of  some  crucial 
situation  by  the  incipient  operation  of  reaction  systems.  It  is 
this  implicit  functioning  of  reaction  patterns  in  perception 
which  shows  the  way  toward  the  development  of  the  con- 
ceptual and  memorial  processes.1 

From  our  description  of  perception  in  development  and  in 
use  it  must  appear  that  these  are  not  two  distinct  operations, 
but  rather  two  mutually  interrelated  processes.  Since  the 
perceptual  activities  are  constantly  developing  we  have  in 
practically  every  new  operation  of  a  perceptual  reaction  system 

1  As  a  matter  of  fact,  so  far  as  psychophysiological  mechanism  goes,  there  is  oniy 
a  difference  in  degree  between  perception  and  thought,  but  from  the  standpoint  of 
results  effected  through  these  reactions  the  variation  is  or  may  be  enormous. 


SCIENTIFIC  INTERPRETATION  OF  PERCEPTION  201 

a  more  complex  integration  of  the  component  action  elements 
with  the  stimulating  situation.  If  we  consider  the  perceptual 
reaction  as  the  use  of  meanings  stimulated  by  direct  contact 
with  objects,  we  find  that  the  distinction  between  the  develop- 
ment of  perception  and  its  use,  depends  upon  the  amount  of 
direct  stimulation  which  is  required  to  elicit  the  response. 
Perception  in  development  requires  a  relatively  larger  series 
of  direct  contacts  to  effect  an  equally  complex  response  than 
is  true  in  the  case  of  perception  in  use,  since  in  the  latter  case 
the  meaning  attaches  to  an  incipient  reaction  pattern.  We 
repeat,  the  development  of  perception  is  a  process  of  so  in- 
tegrating acts  that  only  a  minimum  of  receptors  may  be 
necessary  to  effect  the  appropriate  response.  If  we  remember 
that  this  development  never  ceases,  provided  that  we  have 
occasion  to  react  to  the  given  stimulating  object,  then  it  is 
clear  that  perception  in  use  is  merely  the  condition  of  respond- 
ing on  the  basis  of  a  previously  acquired  reaction  system, 
pending  its  modification  by  the  present  contact  with  the  object 
in  question. 

The  Specific  Mechanisms  of  Perception. — A  more  penetrating 
analysis  of  perception  than  we  have  yet  made  will  yield  informa- 
tion as  to  the  specific  integrations  which  operate  in  the  per- 
ceptual reactions.  To  a  certain  point  we  can  trace  the  precise 
organization  of  the  component  processes,  such  as  the  muscular, 
cognitive,  glandular,  neural,  etc.  Our  ability  to  do  this  is 
made  possible  by  the  fact  that  underlying  all  these  modifica- 
tions is  a  simple  psychological  law  which  may  be  formulated 
as  follows.  Every  integrative  modification  of  a  reaction  pattern 
is  a  direct  function  of  a  differential  contact  with  actual  things. 

By  far  the  most  important  problem  of  perception  arises 
just  here,  namely,  what  are  the  specific  means  of  contact  be- 
tween the  organism  and  objects?  The  interest  in  this  problem 
emerges  because  of  the  inevitable  incorrect  inference  from  the 
customary  psychological  premises,  namely,  that  the  cognitive 
qualities  are  existential  processes  somehow  aroused  in  'con- 
sciousness'which  bring  about  the  movements  of  the  organism. 
Now  as  a  matter  of  fact,  it  is  easily  seen  that  in  any  description 
of  perception  the  qualities  mentioned  (odors,  colors,  etc.)  are 


202  /.  R.  KANTOR 

abstracted  from  the  objects.  The  discrimination  of  these 
qualities  as  it  occurs  in  the  actual  response  is  in  part  the  per- 
ceptual act;  that  is  to  say,  the  discriminative  process  con- 
stitutes part  of  the  perceptual  act  as  distinguished  from  the 
overt  action  which  follows  it.  The  discriminative  factors  are 
thus  seen  to  be  phases  of  concrete  psychophysiological  pro- 
cesses, and  this  means  in  effect  the  total  extrusion  from  the 
perceptual  act  of  any  substantial  mental  or  subjectivistic 
quality. 

Responsible  for  the  view  of  the  existence  and  primary 
functioning  of  sensation  qualities,  is  the  psychological  tradition 
which  makes  knowledge  the  differentia  between  biological  and 
psychological  acts.  Taking  conscious  behavior  as  our  starting 
point,  we  may  catch  a  glimpse  of  the  true  significance  of  the 
perceptual  reaction  as  a  knowledge  process  which  brings  about 
adequate,  psychological  adaptations,  and  still  keep  our  descrip- 
tive analysis  of  the  facts  within  the  range  of  observational 
interpretation.  The  favorable  prognosis  for  the  scientific  de- 
velopment of  psychology  depends  in  large  measure  upon  the 
rejection  of  a  theory  implying  that  the  adjustmental  responses 
of  the  individual  are  due  to  a  mystic  potency  resident  in 
'consciousness.'  In  place  of  such  a  theory  should  be  sub- 
stituted a  verifiable  interactional  mechanics  of  natural  things. 
Upon  the  basis  of  such  an  interactional  mechanics  it  is  possible 
to  avoid  the  assumption  that  perceptual  responses  are  pri- 
marily cognitive  operations  or  that  they  are  'consciousness,' 
that  is  to  say,  awareness  of  something,  rather  than  adjustment 
acts. 

Thus,  the  problem  of  the  contact  of  the  individual  with 
objects  is  reduced  to  the  description  of  the  precise  manner  in 
which  a  reaction  pattern  or  system  is  put  into  operation  by 
the  stimulating  object.  Here  we  have  to  assume  that  the 
reaction  is  that  of  a  conscious  organism,  which  has  the  capacity 
to  react  to  colors  and  other  qualities.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  the 
notions  we  have  of  such  qualities  are  historically  developed 
through  the  discriminating  evaluations  of  such  conscious  beings. 
Now,  although  it  may  be  impossible  to  develop  a  detailed 
analysis  of  all  that  takes  place  in  a  perceptual  reaction,  we  can 


SCIENTIFIC  INTERPRETATION  OF  PERCEPTION  *<>3 

isolate  series  of  systems  which  play  their  part  in  such  reactions. 
These  systems  are  logically  ordered  sequences  of  events  which 
occur  when  a  perceptual  reaction  is  made.  An  example  of  one 
of  these  systems  is  the  cycle  beginning  with  the  reflection  of 
light  rays  of  definite  sorts  which  set  up  differential  processes 
in  the  retina,  followed  by  definite  happenings  traced  out  in 
the  neural  pathways  and  in  the  cortical  areas  of  the  brain. 
The  completion  of  the  cycle  involves  the  consideration  of 
changes  taking  place  in  the  association  tracts  and  the  motor 
localities  of  the  cortex,  the  happenings  in  the  efferent  trans- 
mission system  and  in  the  effectors  located  in  muscles  and 
glands.1 

Of  extremely  great  consequence  is  the  series  of  appreciative 
and  feeling  processes  which  are  factors  in  the  operation  of  the 
total  reaction  system  under  discussion.  The  important  point 
here  is  that  the  perceptual  reaction  must  be  looked  upon  as 
one  of  the  ways  in  which  a  psychophysiological  machine  is 
operating.  Above  all,  what  we  wish  to  avoid  is  the  conception 
that  the  physico-neural  functions  constituting  part  of  the 
perceptual  act,  are  the  causes  or  the  parallels  of  conscious 
action.  A  very  simple  means  to  avoid  this  confusion  is  to 
remember  that  we  are  dealing  here  with  two  phases  of  a 
natural  happening  which  for  scientific  purposes  are  differently 
classified,  but  never  separated,  and  also  that  no  process  is 
any  more  tangible  than  another.  Physical  processes  are  not 
tangible  physical  substances,  nor  are  the  physiological  factors 
biological  material;  neither  are  both  of  these  functions  abso- 
lutely distinct  from  the  mental  processes  which  naturally  do 
not  reduce  themselves  to  mentality,  a  substance  the  existence 
of  which  we  all  join  in  denying.  What  we  must  describe  here 
is  a  psychophysiological  reaction,  for  it  is  only  such  a  reaction 
which  can  be  the  object  of  our  observations.  While  observing 

1  The  reader  who  is  interested  in  a  more  detailed  discussion  of  the  mechanisms, 
of  conscious  behavior  is  referred  to  Watson's  recent  volume,  'Psychology  from  the 
Standpoint  of  a  Behaviorist,'  which  contains  the  best  description  in  psychological 
literature  of  the  behavioristic  components  of  a  reaction  system.  Because  of  the 
author's  resolute  attempt  to  suppress  the  mentalistic  components  of  the  reaction 
pattern,  the  book  contains  merely  suggestions,  though  frequently  very  important 
ones  (especially  in  the  chapter  on  Emotions),  concerning  those  phases  of  a  conscious 
response. 


204  /•  R-  KANTOR 

a  psychophysiological  organism  we  can  discriminate  between 
acts  involving  a  response  pattern  of  predominantly  mental 
factors  and  others  having  the  physiological  factors  more  promi- 
nent. It  is  the  former  type  of  psychophysiological  act  which 
is  usually  called  subjective,  and  which  is  in  part  responsible 
for  the  inexcusable  separation  of  the  mentalistic  and  behavior- 
istic  phases  of  a  unitary  act. 

Since  we  can  analyze  many  of  the  isolated  factors  of  a  per- 
ceptual reaction  we  can  describe  specific  correlations  between 
the  qualities  of  objects  and  the  particular  phases  of  the  reaction 
pattern.  Thus  colors,  sounds,  tastes,  hardnesses,  etc.,  can  be 
coordinated  with  specific  receptor  systems,  because  during  the 
evolutionary  development  of  the  organism  the  receptor  systems 
became  differentiated  in  sensitivity  to  particular  kinds  of 
stimuli,  which  objects  initiated.  For  example,  the  retinae  are 
normally  sensitive  only  to  light  rays  reflected  by  the  colored 
surfaces  of  objects,  and  the  cochlea  to  air  vibrations,  which 
emanate  from  sounding  bodies.  In  passing,  we  might  point 
out  that  our  analysis  has  provided  no  basis  for  the  assumption 
that  'objects  as  perceived'  are  synthesized  in  some  form  out 
of  qualities  produced  in  the  mind  or  in  the  organism  by  stimuli 
set  up  by  objects.  After  many  detours  this  view  just  men- 
tioned has  seeped  into  current  psychology  from  the  Berkeleyan 
head  waters,  and  for  a  long  time  has  been  effective  in  preventing 
the  conception  of  psychological  phenomena  in  a  scientific  way. 
In  contrast  to  the  Berkeleyan  view,  we  must  look  upon  the 
stimuli  which  constitute  the  middle  link  between  objects 
and  organisms  as  natural  predisposing  conditions,  mediating 
changes  in  the  activities  of  the  latter,  much  after  the  fashion 
in  which  an  electric  current  produces  changes  in  a  machine. 
The  undesirable  consequences  of  thinking  that  in  perception 
there  is  a  synthesis  of  objects  is  well  illustrated  by  the  concep- 
tion that  space  and  time  are  somehow  compounded  by  some 
additional  attribute  of  the  mental  'contents'  called  sensa- 
tions. 

The  Relational  Character  of  Perception. — Observations  upon 
the  perceptual  interaction  with  things  convince  us  that  not 
only  are  all  perceptual  reactions  not  merely  responses  to  specific 


SCIENTIFIC  INTERPRETATION  OF  PERCEPTION  205 

qualities,  but  also  that  they  are  not  confined  to  isolated  objects; 
they  are  more  than  either  of  these  descriptions  indicate,  namely, 
responses  to  a  complete  object  in  all  its  setting.  We  might 
generalize  this  fact  by  saying  that  we  always  perceive  situa- 
tions, not  isolated  things,  and  of  course  our  conduct  is  condi- 
tioned accordingly.  Thus  a  chair  which  ordinarily  would  be 
responded  to  by  being  sat  in,  will  not  call  out  such  a  response 
when  it  is  occupied  by  some  object  or  when  there  are  indi- 
viduals present  before  whom  it  is  impolite  to  make  such  a 
response.  In  every  such  case  the  meaning  of  the  object  will 
depend  upon  the  contextually  related  objects.  When  the  chair 
itself  is  reacted  to,  we  respond  to  a  unified  object,  and  not  to 
simple  elements  (back,  seat,  legs,  etc.);  that  is  to  say,  we 
react  to  an  object  to-be-sat-in,  and  not  to  isolated  fragments 
which  require  to  be  somehow  connected.  This  relational  char- 
acter of  perception  is  excellently  illustrated  by  our  responses 
in  which  words  and  not  letters  are  the  stimulating  objects,  and 
in  which  the  words  are  directly  and  inseparably  attached  to 
other  words.1 

That  we  can  immediately  appreciate  a  complex  situation 
apparently  comprising  many  diverse  elements  is  owing  to  this 
relational  character  of  perception.  Thus,  in  looking  at  a  land- 
scape the  objects  all  seem  to  be  in  their  proper  places;  distances 
are  correctly  located  and  the  lights  and  shadows  properly 
distributed.  The  total  situation  is  the  customary  object  of  our 
reactions  and  is  thus  the  stimulus  to  a  unified  primary  response 
or  simple  apprehension.  The  meaning  of  the  total  situation 
can  be  readily  and  completely  confounded  by  placing  ourselves 
in  a  position  incapacitating  us  for  response,  such  as  looking  at 
the  landscape  with  our  head  upside  down.  Much  the  same 
effect  is  produced  by  looking  at  an  inverted  painting.  In  such 
situations  what  happens  is  that  the  series  of  integrated  reaction 
systems  are  thrown  out  of  their  customary  harmonic  organiza- 
tion and  must  be  reorganized  before  the  object  can  be  correctly 
perceived.  Experiments  on  space  perception  have  shown  that 

1  James  points  out  with  his  characteristic  description  the  unnatural  aspect  which 
a  word  takes  when  looked  at  in  protracted  isolation.  "It  stares  at  him  from  the 
paper  like  a  glass  eye  with  no  speculation  in  it.  Its  body  is  indeed  there,  but  its  soul 
is  fled."  'Princ.  of  Psychol.,'  Vol.  II.,  p.  81. 


206  /.  R.  KANTOR 

by  practice  disorganized  response  systems  can  readily  be 
reintegrated.1 

The  difference  in  the  responses  to  objects  when  they  appear 
in  different  contextual  relations  illustrates  the  extremely  subtle 
interaction  between  the  stimulating  object  and  the  reacting 
person,  and  also  shows  the  operation  of  perception  as  an  ad  just- 
mental  reaction  to  surrounding  objects.  Pliableness  of  the 
individual  in  this  sense  constitutes  an  important  factor  of 
general  intelligence  and  exemplifies  the  law  of  integrated  modi- 
fications of  reaction  systems  mentioned  above. 

The  Interpretative  Function  of  Perception. — Since  every  psy- 
chological phenomenon  is  a  product  of  two  factors,  namely, 
the  stimulus  and  the  response,  our  discussion  of  the  influence 
of  the  stimulating  circumstances  upon  our  perceptual  reactions 
naturally  leads  to  the  consideration  of  the  influence  of  the 
individual's  stock  of  reaction  patterns  upon  any  given  present 
reaction.  An  observable  fact  it  is,  that  the  reaction  systems 
which  the  individual  has  developed  in  his  constant  contact 

'  *-* 

with  objects,  play  a  large  part  in  any  present  reaction;  for  in 
a  genuine  way  such  reaction  patterns  constitute  the  individual 
at  the  moment.  And  since  as  we  have  indicated,  these  response 
patterns  have  been  developed  in  the  individual's  previous 
experience,  every  perceptual  reaction  may  be  thought  of  as 
an  interpretative  function.  In  effect,  this  means  that  the 
person  will  respond  to  objects  much  as  he  has  been  accustomed 
to  do  under  previous  conditions  of  contact  with  similar  objects. 
It  is  this  fact  which  gives  origin  to  the  idea  that  perception  is 
a  kind  of  habit.2  Being  equipped  with  a  response  system  to 
react  to  stimulating  objects,  is  fundamental  as  a  condition  of 
every  recognition  behavior.  The  element  of  novelty  conies 
into  a  response  situation  precisely  at  the  point  at  which  the 
person  is  unable  to  offer  a  complete  response  to  the  present 
stimulating  object.  Since  the  meaning  of  the  object  is  not 
fully  comprehended  the  person  can  respond  in  a  way  which  is 
only  a  partial  reproduction  of  a  previous  form  of  response. 
The  lack  of  complete  recognition  means  that  the  person  is  not 

1  Cf.  Stratton,  PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1897,  4,  341-360,  463-481. 

2  C/.  Angell,  'Psychology/  1910,  p.  157. 


SCIENTIFIC  INTERPRETATION  OF  PERCEPTION 

supplied  with  a  reaction  system  to  respond  immediately  to 
the  object  in  question.  In  such  a  case  the  pressing  need  for 
a  response  to  the  object  results  in  an  incipient  trial  and  error 
process  ending  in  a  clear-cut  appreciation  of  its  meaning  and 
a  consequent  thinking  reaction. 

The  interpretative  function  of  the  perceptual  reactions  is 
observable  in  many  instances  of  daily  occurrence.  In  the 
case  of  reading  and  speaking  we  find  that  there  is  very  little 
stimulating  material,  but  the  response  is  not  at  all  interfered 
with.  In  listening  to  a  familiar  voice,  or  familiar  written 
material,  we  can  easily  demonstrate  to  ourselves  that  our 
response  patterns  are  aroused  by  no  considerable  amount  of 
excitation.  No  doubt  the  explanation  for  this  lies  in  the 
individual's  possession  of  dispositions  organized  for  particular 
forms  of  situations  and  any  prominent  feature  of  those  situa- 
tions will  set  off  the  reaction  patterns.  It  is  here  that  we 
find  the  bases  for  the  incorrect  or  unexpected  responses  com- 
monly called  illusions.  For  the  same  reason  a  person^with  a 
limited  experience  will  be  ready  upon  fewer  occasions  to  respond 
to  objects,  and  on  those  occasions  will  be  slower  to  make  the 
reaction.  It  has  been  aptly  said,1  that  'the  artist  sees  details 
while  to  other  eyes  there  is  a  vague  and  confused  mass;  the 
naturalist  sees  an  animal  where  the  ordinary  eye  sees  only  a 
form/  That  the  child  reacts  to  objects  in  monotonously 
similar  ways,  is  true  because  it  has  been  impossible  for  him 
to  build  up  many  reaction  systems.  And  so  the  significance 
of  the  pony  and  what  can  be  done  with  it  are  the  same  as 
in  the  case  of  the  dog,  with  only  a  variation  ;n  size.  The 
classical  illustration  of  the  observable  facts  in  this  case  is 
found  in  the  name  response  (big  dog)  which  the  child  makes 
to  the  pony. 

The  Elaboration  of  the  Perceptual  Functions. — The  constant 
development  of  the  perceptual  response  serves  as  one  of  the 
individual's  important  means  for  a  growing  mastery  over  his 
environment.  As  the  reactions  to  an  object  multiply,  that  is, 
as  the  number  of  responses  which  it  calls  out  increases,  the 
object  takes  on  more  and  more  meaning.  It  is  owing  to  this 

1  Lewes,  'Problems  of  Life  and  Mind,'  3d  series,  p.  107. 


208  y.  R.  KANTOR 

increasing  elaboration  of  the  perceptual  response  systems 
through  the  addition  of  meaning  factors  that  the  organism  is 
enabled  to  make  its  way  with  greater  facility  through  the 
maze  of  its  surrounding  objects.  This  facility  is  further  in- 
creased by  the  fact  that  this  elaboration  of  the  perceptual 
response  systems  makes  it  possible  for  the  person  to  adapt 
himself  to  many  situations  without  invoking  a  definite  problem 
of  adaptation.  Because  of  the  absence  of  such  a  specific 
problem,  and  the  consequent  exclusion  of  a  thought  function, 
the  simple  form  of  the  perceptual  reaction  allows  for  an  im- 
mediate response  to  objects. 

As  a  hypothetical  illustration  of  the  growth  of  the  perceptual 
responses  we  might  consider  the  reactions  of  a  child  to  a  type- 
writer. Allowing  for  a  definite  development  already  attained, 
the  machine  may  be  at  first  merely  a  thing  which  can  produce 
a  series  of  sounds  when  the  keys  are  pressed.  The  machine, 
then,  as  soon  as  it  is  seen,  has  merely  the  sound-making 
meaning  in  the  immediate  response.  With  a  more  extended 
acquaintance  with  the  machine  the  child  learns  that  it  can 
stimulate  different  and  additional  responses,  and  it  thus  has  a 
different  meaning  when  perceived.  Finally,  the  machine  takes 
on  the  complete  set  of  meanings  which  are  derived  from  all 
the  responses  the  child  can  make  to  it.  The  point  is,  that 
what  sort  of  perceptual  reaction  an  object  will  call  out  at 
any  time,  or  what  it  will  mean,  will  depend  upon  the  sum  total 
of  the  person's  contacts  with  the  object  in  question.  The 
perceptions  of  persons  grow  continually,  and  the  growth  de- 
pends upon  the  addition  of  new  features  to  the  response 
patterns  and  of  completely  new  patterns  of  response. 

The  development  of  perceptions  by  the  growth  of  responses 
is  well  illustrated  when  we  are  at  the  point  of  substituting  an 
object  for  another  in  the  face  of  an  immediate  need.  Thus,  a 
chair  becomes  a  barricade,  or  step  ladder,  or  typewriter  table. 
As  a  consequence  of  the  person's  being  forced  to  make  new 
and  unusual  responses  to  objects,  the  latter  become  endowed 
with  a  range  of  new  meanings.  In  the  above  illustration  we 
also  observe  the  active  relating  function  as  it  occurs  on  the 
perceptual  level.  The  similarity  between  objects  is  of  course 


SCIENTIFIC  INTERPRETATION  OF  PERCEPTION  209 

a  fundamental  causative  factor  in  the  perception  building 
activity,  since  otherwise  the  possible  reactions  to  objects  would 
be  at  such  variance  as  not  to  admit  of  any  correlation. 

II 

If  the  brief  description  of  the  perceptual  reaction  which  we 
have  essayed  is  correct,  it  obviates  some  of  the  most  salient 
errors  in  current  discussions  of  perception,  and  places  the 
interpretation  of  such  processes  upon  a  definite  natural  science 
level.  Let  us  first  observe,  then,  that  the  perceptual  reaction 
is  always  a  reaction  and  not  a  thing,  namely  a  complex  organiza- 
tion of  subjective  qualities.  Moreover,  a  perceptual  reaction 
is  a  psychophysiological  reaction  as  all  data  of  psychology  are. 
That  is  to  say,  the  perceptual  act  is  not  in  any  sense  the  act 
of  an  ego,  or  mind  of  whatever  description,  nor  of  a  nervous 
system,  but  a  complex  reaction  system  involving  all  the  func- 
tions of  a  conscious  being.  Notice  that  the  vexing  problem 
of  a  self,  vexing,  that  is,  once  it  is  allowed,  plays  no  part 
whatever  in  the  interpretation  we  have  made  above.  For  the 
sum  of  the  reaction  systems  which  adjust  the  individual  con- 
stitute the  person,  and  since  each  person  because  of  his  par- 
ticular interaction  with  things  and  persons,  has  developed 
definite  types  of  reaction  patterns,  the  problem  of  character 
or  personality  is  thereby  solved.  Since  psychology  is  interested 
only  in  such  reaction  systems  there  is  naturally  a  perfect  co- 
ordination between  psychology  and  the  other  sciences  of  the 
individual,  such  as  anatomy,  for  example,  which  is  interested 
in  the  structure  whose  functions  form  part  of  the  reaction 
pattern. 

That  we  cannot  assume  that  in  the  perceptual  act  we  have 
besides  an  object  stimulating  the  organism,  and  the  organism 
(frequently  taken  to  be  merely  the  nervous  system)  also  an 
object  of  perception,  that  is,  a  sum  of  mental  qualities,  we 
indicate  by  the  statement  that  there  are  only  two  interacting 
things  in  a  perceptual  as  in  any  psychological  act,  namely, 
the  organism  and  the  physical  object.  The  fact  is  that  the 
physical  object  contains  all  qualities,  colors,  sounds,  tastes, 
hardnesses  which  we  can  ever  analyze  out  of  it,  and  the  organ- 


310  /.  R.  KANTOR 

ism  learns  to  distinguish  these  and  to  name  them  because  of 
specific  psychophysiological  effects  which  contact  with  objects 
brings  about  in  organisms. 

Our  view  may  be  illustrated  by  the  following  example. 
When  we  perceive  a  blue  object,  in  no  sense  is  there  started 
up  a  *  consciousness'  of  blue  by  an  antecedent  or  accompanying 
neural  activity.  As  the  matter  is  stated  by  practically  all 
psychologists  there  comes  to  be  at  this  point  a  blue  conscious- 
ness or  a  blue  sense  quality.  Now  we  maintain  that  the  only 
blue  involved  is  a  blue  object,  independent  of  a  perceiver  and 
in  no  wise  modified  by  the  specific  perceptual  act;  any  change 
in  the  object  must  be  effected  by  the  overt  action  following  the 
perception.  What  occurs  in  the  above  illustration  of  a  per- 
ceptual act,  is  that  the  light  rays  set  into  function  a  complex 
reaction  system  which  involves  the  specific  meaning  of  this 
object,  in  the  sense  that  the  immediate  effect  produced  by  the 
object  on  the  person  may  now  result  in  a  specific  act,  perhaps 
in  the  exclamation,  'I  see  a  blue  flower.'  The  effect  upon  the 
person,  we  repeat,  is  muscular,  neural,  glandular,  cognitional 
and  perhaps  affectional.  Let  us  remember  that  at  this  stage 
we  must  consider  the  activity  as  perception  in  use,  which  has 
developed  through  a  series  of  previous  contacts  with  the  object; 
for  otherwise  many  kinds  of  direct  contacts  besides  those 
mediated  by  light  rays  would  be  necessary,  in  order  to  arouse 
so  definite  a  meaning  of  the  object  as  to  be  followed  by  a 
definite  act. 

Clearly,  the  specific  perceptual  act  is  an  abstraction  from 
an  empirical  interaction  of  a  person  and  an  object;  that  is  to 
say,  the  perception  proper  is  abstracted  from  the  preceding  and 
following  acts  of  the  person,  while  the  object  is  abstracted 
from  its  setting  which  includes  many  other  objects  and  persons. 
The  description  of  a  perceptual  act  is  always  a  deliberate 
rationalization  of  a  complex  event,  a  fact  which  is  at  least 
implicitly  recognized  by  all  psychologists;  even  those  who 
despite  their  Berkeleyan  adherence  to  mental  states  agree 
that  the  perception  of  blue  is  an  abstraction  from  a  blue  object 
(of  perception).1  This  abstracting  process  can  be  made  out 

1  The  writer  refers  here  to  the  statements  by  psychologists  that  sensations  are 
always  abstractions. 


SCIENTIFIC  INTERPRETATION  OF  PERCEPTION  an 

most  clearly  perhaps  by  a  thoroughgoing  analysis  of  the 
development  of  the  naming  reaction  performed  in  denoting 
things. 

While  it  is  almost  impossible  to  describe  so  intricate  an 
organic  activity  as  a  perceptual  act,  and  at  the  same  time 
avoid  completely  falling  into  a  logical  instead  of  a  psychological 
analysis,  it  is  still  possible  so  to  guard  one's  description  as  to 
prevent  an  essential  misconception  of  the  behavior.  But  un- 
fortunately such  misconstruction  is  rarely  guarded  against,  for 
most  analyses  of  perception  merely  amount  to  the  isolation  of 
the  qualities  of  an  object  and  the  transformation  of  them  into 
sensations,  which  in  their  totality  are  presumed  to  constitute 
the  known  object  as  over  against  the  material  object,  which 
by  hypothesis  must  remain  forever  beyond  the  pale  of  mental 
things.1 

At  the  basis  of  the  current,  primarily  logical  analyses  of 
psychological  phenomena  which  may  be  taken  as  symptomatic 
of  the  unscientific  character  of  such  description,  lies  the  pre- 
judice deep  rooted,  that  psychology  is  the  study  of  mental 
states,  a  kind  of  stuff  (masked  by  the  veil  of  process)2  which  is 
different  from  physical  material.  In  no  matter  what  form  this 
subjectivistic  view  is  presented  it  must  be  looked  upon  as  a 
vestige  of  religious  thought  in  psychological  dress.  Today,  it 
must  be  rigidly  extruded  from  scientific  thinking,  since  it  is  a 
prejudgment  of  facts  to  be  observed.  On  the  contrary,  genuine 
scientific  thinking  must  start  with  observable  phenomena,  and 
naturally  enough  when  we  start  in  this  way,  we  never  meet 
with  mentality  or  physicality  as  the  psychologist  deals  with 
them. 

The  immediate  development  from  this  false  dualism  is  that 
the  domain  of  psychology  is  that  of  knowing,  for  consciousness 
is  thinking  stuff.3  Now  thinking  or  knowing  is  assumed  to  be 

1  Sometimes  the  percept  is  considered  as  distinct  from  sense  qualities  as  in  the 
statement  by  Stout,  "The  general  possibility  of  the  transition  from  sense-impression 
to  percept  depends  upon  the  existence  of  the  percept  as  something  distinct  from  the 
sense-presentation  to  which  it  seems  as  a  rallying  point  and  center  of  connection," 
'Analytic  Psychology,'  Vol.  II.,  p.  31. 

1  In  spite  of  the  veil  no  other  interpretation  is  possible  of  a  thing  which  has 
attributes. 

1  The  trend  of  modern  thought  as  influenced  by  Descartes. 


212  /.  R.  KANTOR 

the  most  intangible  and  inaccessible  stuff  or  process,  and  thus 
has  arisen  the  esoteric  psychology  of  introspection.  Clearly 
there  can  be  no  science  which  has  as  its  subject  matter  in- 
tangible and  invisible  subjectivistic  states,  and  for  this  reason 
the  history  of  psychology  mirrors  much  groping  about  for  some 
concrete  material  with  which  to  work.  Finally,  psychologists 
seized  upon  the  nervous  system  as  a  tangible  basis  for  the 
intangible  consciousness.  In  our  own  day  the  behavioristic 
movement  at  least  in  one  of  its  phases  assumes  that  it  is  really 
the  nervous  system  with  which  psychology  has  to  deal  and 
not  at  all  with  consciousness.  This  behavioristic  view,  though 
clearly  mistaken  in  that  it  is  still  based  upon  a  dualism  one 
phase  of  which  is  rejected,  should  be  credited  with  much 
scientific  acumen,  since  it  must  be  taken  as  a  protest  against  the 
obviously  unscientific  character  of  a  mentalistic  psychology. 
For  no  science  can  be  built  upon  things  or  processes  which  are 
not  observable.1  When  we  consider  a  perceptual  act  as  an 
adaptational  response  to  some  natural  object,  we  find  no 
necessity  for  the  dual  interpretation  of  psychological  phe- 
nomena such  as  leads  to  the  problem  how  a  mental  state  can 
be  made  to  know  or  refer  to  an  external  object.  For  the 
functional  psychologist  there  can  be  no  such  problem;  what 
he  is  concerned  with  is  the  way  a  definite  sort  of  interaction 
takes  place  between  two  natural  things,  a  person  and  some 
other  object  which  may  or  may  not  be  a  person.  Thus,  the 
functionalist  does  not  create  for  himself  the  question  as  to  how 
a  conscious  state  can  be  initiated  by  a  previously  or  simul- 
taneously occurring  neural  process. 

Berkeleyan  and  Reidean  influences  in  psychology  are  main- 
tained by  the  confusion  of  the  products  of  logical  analysis  and 
the  concrete  facts  of  conscious  behavior.  Thus,  the  relational 
and  interpretative  character  of  a  psychophysiological  reaction 

1  It  is  not  to  the  point  to  argue  as  Stout  ('Manual,'  1915,  p.  18)  does  that  'mental 
dispositions'  must  be  assumed  to  exist  in  the  way  that  'mass'  and  'energy'  exist, 
though  not  directly  observable,  for  as  he  himself  points  out,  physical  things  and 
processes  are  inferred  from  directly  observable  phenomena.  This  can  not  be  said  for 
his  mental  dispositions,  which  are  not  descriptive  of  actual  facts.  And  furthermore, 
mass  and  energy  are  obviously  useful  categories  of  physical  science,  but  mental  dis- 
positions are  only  necessary  because  of  an  erroneous  subjectivistic  interpretation  of 
human  behavior. 


SCIENTIFIC  INTERPRETATION  OF  PERCEPTION 

is  assumed  to  be  the  growth  of  a  mental  state  which  is  called 
a  perceptual  object.  From  this  standpoint,  animals  and  pos- 
sibly infants  are  presumably  supposed  to  have  no  perception 
because  they  cannot  possibly  have  the  knowledge  which  a 
human  adult  has.  In  detail,  a  perception  is  assumed  to  be 
a  complex  organization  of  sensation  qualities  with  meanings 
attached.  Thus  meaning  is  further  assumed  to  be  the  definite 
self-conscious  interpretation  of  the  sensation  qualities,  clearly 
an  epistemological  view.  In  contrast  to  the  above  view,  we 
have  already  suggested  that  what  occurs  in  nature  is  the  build- 
ing up  of  a  reaction-system,  which  at  first  is  simple,  that  is, 
the  object  has  little  meaning,  and  later  further  contact  with 
the  object  complicates  and  expands  the  reaction  system,  which 
fact  is  interpreted  as  giving  more  meaning  to  the  object  by  the 
increased  number  of  possible  reactions  which  can  now  be 
made  to  it. 

The  consequences  of  the  view  that  perception  is  a  mental 
structure,  are  clearly  brought  out  in  the  issue  raised  by  James1 
concerning  the  confusion  of  the  object  perceived  with  sensations 
or  perceptions  of  the  object.  James  saw  clearly  the  fallacy 
of  Stumpf's  analysis  of  the  sensation  of  oil  of  peppermint  into 
the  sensations  of  taste  and  temperature;  for  James  would 
have  it  'that  we  perceive  that  objective  fact,  known  to  us  as 
the  peppermint  taste  to  contain  those  other  objective  facts 
known  as  aromatic  or  sapid  quality,  and  coldness  respectively.' 
We  cannot  sympathize  with  Stout's2  fear  that  the  view  of 
James  involves  'the  impossibility  not  merely  of  the  "analysis  of 
presentation  "  but  of  all  analysis  properly  so  called,'  although 
we  do  agree  with  him  that  the  psychologist's  interest  is  in  the 
psychological  and  not  particularly  in  the  physical  object.  We 
cannot  agree  with  Stout,  however,  against  James,  (i)  because 
for  the  former  the  psychological  process  must  be  purely  mental, 
and  (2)  because  he  assumes  that  a  perception  must  be  a  com- 
pound of  sensations  such  as  can  be  analyzed.  The  issue 
between  a  functional  and  a  structural  view  is  definitely  brought 
out  here.  Stout  thinks  that  because  he  can  remember  that 
oil  of  peppermint  has  certain  definite  qualities  of  taste  and 

1  'Principles,'  I.,  p.  521  ff. 

1  'Analytic  Psychology,'  1896,  p.  56  ff. 


214  /.  R.  KANTOR 

temperature  he  has  analyzed  a  purely  mental  thing.  Now  as 
a  matter  of  fact  the  memorial  behavior  is  primarily  the  implicit 
functioning  of  a  reaction  system  developed  in  direct  contact 
with  an  object  and  is  therefore  most  certainly  a  psychophysio- 
logical  action.  It  is  precisely  because  Stout  does  not  see  that 
a  reaction  system,  that  is  to  say  the  system  built  up  in  per- 
ceptual contact  with  objects,  can  be  put  into  function  by  a 
substitution  stimulus  that  he  means  to  perpetuate  the  men- 
talistic  tradition  in  psychology.  If  we  assume  that  what  is 
studied  in  psychology  is  the  development  of  the  complex 
reaction  patterns  and  the  means  whereby  they  are  put  into 
complete  or  incipient  function  by  various  types  of  stimuli, 
we  need  never  invoke  any  mysterious  or  inscrutable  entities. 

The  literature  on  space  perception  clearly  demonstrates  the 
hopelessness,  from  a  scientific  standpoint,  of  the  mentalistic 
doctrines.  For,  the  problem  of  space  in  mentalistic  psychology 
is  the  problem  of  building  up  or  constructing  space  instead  of 
the  observation  of  the  specific  means  whereby  a  person  per- 
forms space  reactions  and  adapts  himself  to  objects  variously 
placed.  When  space  reactions  and  not  geometry  is  made  the 
subject  matter  of  the  psychology  of  space  the  problem  of  the 
genetic  or  a  priori  character  of  space  drops  out  of  sight.  In 
the  observation  and  interpretation  of  space  reactions  there 
can  be  no  question  of  innateness  or  acquisition  of  knowledge 
of  space,  for  a  space  reaction  is  not  essentially  knowledge  as 
we  have  indicated  in  our  description  of  the  perceptual  reaction. 
There  is  no  doubt,  however,  that  our  knowledge  of  space  is 
derived  more  or  less  directly  from  the  space  reactions,  but  this 
is  a  problem  of  logic  and  not  of  psychology.  The  study  of  the 
literature  on  space  perception  shows  us  clearly  how  the  psy- 
chologists persist  in  forcing  into  their  science  epistemological 
problems  which  should  have  no  place  therein.  Curiously 
enough  the  epistemological  view  gains  impetus  from  an  at- 
tempt to  give  psychology  a  scientific  setting  as  is  familiarly 
illustrated  by  the  influence  of  Helmholtz's  ideas  of  mathe- 
matical space  upon  the  development  of  the  psychology  of 
space  perception. 

The  ascription  to  current  psychologists  of  a  subjectivistic 


SCIENTIFIC  INTERPRETATION  OF  PERCEPTION 

heritage  from  Berkeley  and  Reid  may  call  for  some  explanation. 
The  statement  that  we  are  still  working  and  thinking  in  the 
Berkeleyan  tradition  does  not  exclude  the  fact  that  current 
introspectionism  was  established  and  elaborated  by  the  work 
of  the  German  physiologists.  It  is  of  course  a  matter  of 
common  knowledge  that  the  introspective  view  was  made 
possible  and  plausible  by  the  physiological  experiment  which, 
dealing  with  isolated  physiological  functions,  had  to  assume  a 
correlated  mental  state  to  complete  the  description  of  the 
reaction  observed.  It  is  thus  that  the  work  of  the  German 
writers  from  Herbart  through  Fechner  to  Wundt,  although 
designed  to  place  psychology  upon  a  sound  scientific  basis 
has  in  reality,  because  of  its  maintenance  of  the  subjectivistic 
tradition,  accomplished  the  opposite. 

The  proposed  interpretation  of  the  perceptual  reactions 
suggests  the  extrusion  of  the  separation  doctrine  from  psy- 
chology and  thus  makes  toward  the  removal  of  what  is  probably 
the  greatest  hindrance  to  the  thorough  establishment  of  psy- 
chology as  a  science.  For,  as  long  as  psychology  deals  with 
conscious  or  mental  states  of  any  sort  whatsoever  it  cannot 
ever  attain  to  the  dignity  of  a  science  as  Kant  long  ago  asserted. 
This  statement  holds  whether  consciousness  is  taken  as  an 
attribute  of  the  psyche  or  mind,  or  of  the  states  of  consciousness 
and  unconsciousness  which  are  presumed  to  be  the  mind. 

In  conclusion,  we  might  point  out  that  although  the  organic 
conception  of  psychological  phenomena  appears  to  some  psy- 
chologists as  widely  accepted,1  the  manifest  predominance  of 
the  mentalistic  and  behavioristic  views  would  seem  to  indicate 
the  contrary.  The  apparent  prevalence  of  the  organic  con- 
ception may  be  accounted  for  on  the  principle  that  insofar  as 
a  psychologist  is  to  describe  some  actual  psychological  fact, 
the  description  must  in  some  fashion  correspond  to  the  fact, 
regardless  of  the  private  view  of  the  writer.  Thus,  much  of 
current  practice  may  be  organic,  but  the  question  remains 
whether  psychology  can  make  much  progress  toward  scientific 

1  Cf.  Carr,  PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1917,  24,  182.  "The  conception  is  unorthodox  only 
in  relation  to  prevailing  definitions  of  psychology.  To  my  mind  it  is  essentially  in 
harmony  with  the  dominant  point  of  view  of  the  science,  and  it  is  not  wholly  incon- 
sistent with  much  of  current  practice." 


j.  R.  KANTOR 

stability  if  psychologists  do  not  fully  appreciate  the  character 
of  the  materials  with  which  they  deal.  While  it  is  certainly 
true  that  definitions  may  linger  far  behind  practice,  the  scien- 
tific practice  in  which  this  occurs,  lacks  much  in  desirable 
effectiveness.  Even  if  scientists  were  forced  to  recognize  all 
the  component  functions  of  a  reaction,  they  might  still  be 
lacking  in  a  full  appreciation  of  the  organic  interpretation  of 
such  a  reaction.  That  there  is  little  genuine  interest  in  the 
psychophysiological  view  among  psychologists  is  evidenced 
by  the  general  paucity  of  articles  written  from  that  standpoint.1 
Undoubtedly  true  it  is,  that  the  biological  influence  in  psy- 
chology has  fostered  the  unitary  conception  of  organisms,  but 
it  has  not  resulted  in  any  complete  modification  of  viewpoint. 
In  fact,  the  rise  of  the  behavioristic  movement  urges  the  belief 
that  there  is  no  general  tendency  to  look  upon  psychological 
phenomena  as  they  naturally  function  but  as  they  are  tradi- 
tionally supposed  to  operate.  A  sympathetic  acceptance  of 
the  objective  functional  view  must  result  in  the  description  of 
the  complete  actual  psychophysiological  reaction  pattern,  and 
the  consequent  rejection  of  the  exclusively  mental  or  physical 
interpretation. 

xTwo  notable  exceptions  must  be  here  referred  to,  namely,  Carr,  'The  Relation 
between  Emotion  and  its  Expression,'  PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1917,  24,  369,  and  Peterson, 
'The  Functioning  of  Ideas  in  Social  Groups,'  PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1918,  25,  214. 


INSTINCT  AND  PURPOSE 

BY  EDWARD  CHACE  TOLMAN 

University  of  California 

This  paper  will  be  roughly  divided  into  two  parts.  The 
first  part  will  present  a  definition  of  instinct.  The  second 
part  will  use  this  definition  in  a  psychological  analysis  of 
purpose.  The  discussion  will  be  throughout  from  an  objective, 
external  standpoint,  that  is,  the  interest  will  be  in  how  purpose 
works  rather  than  in  how  it  feels. 

By  way  of  introduction  let  us  liken  the  human  being  to  a 
slot-machine.  The  pennies  will  represent  the  stimuli,  i.e.,  the 
sights,  sounds,  printed  symbols  and  the  like  which  we  may 
apply  to  the  machine,  and  the  resulting  pieces  of  candy  the 
words,  action,  and  movements  which  issue  forth.  If  the  penny 
be  a  word  of  praise,  the  answering  candy  may  be  a  blush  or 
sparkle  of  the  eye.  If  the  coin  we  apply  be  an  insult  or  a  blow, 
the  resulting  packet  will  probably  contain  vituperation.  If 
the  penny  be  the  word  'white 'spoken  suddenly  and  in  no  par- 
ticular connection,  the  answering  phonograph  sound  will  in  all 
probability  be  the  word  'black.'  In  every  case,  if  we  but  knew 
the  mechanism  well  enough,  we  could  predict  a  particular 
action  as  the  result  of  a  particular  stimulus. 

But  let  us  see  in  what  ways  this  picture  of  the  simple 
slot-machine  is  inadequate.  We  may  note  that  sometimes 
when  a  stimulus  is  presented  to  the  human  machine,  nothing 
externally  observable  issues  forth;  or,  again,  that  something 
quite  different  from  a  previous  response  to  the  very  same 
stimulus  comes  out.  These  facts  of  the  uncertainty  and 
changeableness  of  response  in  the  human  machine,  though 
one  and  the  same  stimulus  be  presented,  require  the  assumption 
of  two  principles  not  contained  in  the  simple  machine  so  far 
described.  The  first  of  these  principles  is  that  the  nature  of 
the  response  on  any  given  occasion,  or  whether  in  fact  there 
is  any  overt  response  at  all,  is  dependent  upon  the  general 

217 


21 8  EDWARD  CHACE   TOLMAN 

internal  adjustment  of  the  organism  at  the  moment.  To  make 
a  slot-machine  adequate  to  such  a  situation  we  would  have  to 
imagine  a  complex  machine  capable  of  various  different  adjust- 
ments such  that,  when  one  adjustment  was  in  force,  the 
succeeding  pennies  produced  musical  sounds,  when  another 
was  present,  the  same  pennies  introduced  into  the  same  slots 
produced  different  kinds  of  candy,  and  so  on  for  each  different 
adjustment.  Finally,  we  would  have  to  assume  in  addition 
that  some  of  these  internal  adjustments  might  act  like  partial 
locking  devices  such  that,  when  they  were  in  force,  no  response 
at  all  would  be  produced  from  some  single  penny  or  for  some 
particular  group  of  pennies. 

These  internal  adjustments  would  sometimes  arise  primarily 
as  the  result  of  just  preceding  external  stimuli  and  sometimes 
as  due  almost  wholly  to  automatic  changes  within  the  organism 
itself.  If  a  man  refuses  food  (i.e.,  if  the  eating  response  is 
locked),  it  may  be  because  of  a  preceding  stimulus  such  for 
example  as  a  slap  in  his  face  which  has  aroused  the  internal 
adjustment  which  we  call  anger  (which  locks  the  eating  re- 
sponses) ;  or  it  may  be  because  of  some  automatic  physiological 
condition  (e.g.,  lack  of  hunger)  which,  though  not  positively 
locking,  at  least  does  nothing  to  unlock  the  eating  responses. 
If  a  man  responds  to  one  and  the  same  book  on  one  day  with 
tears  and  on  another  with  laughter,  the  change  in  internal 
adjustment  bringing  about  the  change  in  response  may  be  due 
either  to  a  specific  preceding  stimulus  or  to  some  mere  physio- 
logical rhythm. 

The  second  principle  which  the  simple  slot-machine  lacks 
and  which  it  should  possess,  if  it  is  to  adequately  represent  the 
human  organism,  concerns  the  changeableness  of  response  in 
the  human  organism  which  is  due  to  learning.  Everywhere 
we  find  that,  simply  as  a  result  of  previous  experience,  the 
organism  exhibits  new  responses  to  stimuli.  When  a  child 
learns  to  play  the  piano  it  acquires  a  series  of  finger  movements 
in  response  to  black  marks  on  paper  to  which,  before,  it  did 
not  react  at  all.  When  one  learns  to  read  and  write,  to  play 
tennis,  to  open  and  close  doors,  to  lace  and  unlace  shoes; 
when,  in  short,  one  learns  any  of  the  million  and  one  things 


INSTINCT  AND  PURPOSE  219 

which  one  does  learn,  one  is  merely  attaching  responses  to 
stimuli  which  did  not  originally  call  them  out.1 

No  easy  way  of  representing  such  alteration  in  the  case  of 
the  slot-machines,  however,  suggests  itself.  We  will,  therefore, 
have  to  think  of  the  latter  as  illustrating  but  single  stages  in 
the  human  organism  and  imagine  a  new  and  improved  machine 
as  a  result  of  each  acquisition  of  new  traits  and  habits. 

To  sum  up:  the  human  being  is  a  mechanism  which  makes 
responses  to  external  stimuli.  The  nature  of  these  responses 
and  whether  there  is  any  overt  response  at  all,  however,  is  a 
variable  matter.  This  changeability  depends,  first,  upon  the 
possibility  of  different  internal  adjustments  (either  called  out 
by  specific  external  stimuli  or  as  the  result  of  internal  physio- 
logical  rhythms),  and  second,  upon  the  changes  in  the  internal 
structure  of  the  organism  due  to  learning.2 

Our  task  must  now  be  a  more  specific  classification  and 
description  of  such  responses  and  internal  adjustments.  Dif- 
ferent classification  would  no  doubt  be  possible,  but  for  our 
interest,  which  is  concerned  primarily  with  a  definition  of 
instinct,  the  necessary  classification  is  simple.  It  contains  but 
three  groups:  (i)  independent  reflexes,  (2)  subordinate  acts, 
and  (3)  determining  adjustments. 

By  an  independent  reflex  we  shall  mean  any  response  to  a 
stimulus  which  takes  place  always  in  the  same  manner  and 
relatively  independently  of  what  the  rest  of  the  organism  is 
doing.  The  kick  of  the  foot  in  response  to  a  tap  on  the  knee, 
winking  in  response  to  a  movement  before  the  eyes,  sneezing 
in  response  to  tickling  the  nose,  yawning  in  response  to  certain 
internal  sensations,  are  examples.  These  always  occur  in 
much  the  same  way  and  each  is  relatively  complete  in  itself 
and  independent  of  what  the  rest  of  the  organism  may  be  doing. 

Activities  on  the  other  hand,   such   as  biting,   chewing, 

1  And  this  holds,  be  it  noted,  not  only  for  actual  overt  responses,  but  also  for  the 
internal  adjustments  we  have  just  discussed.  Thus,  for  example,  the  internal  adjust- 
ments originally  appropriate  to  and  only  aroused  by  such  things  as  loud  sudden  noises 
and  really  startling  objects  may  as  a  result  of  training  get  attached  to  a  whole  series 
of  secondary  associated  objects  such  as  the  dark,  strange  faces,  etc. 

1  Also  upon  changes  resulting  in  the  course  of  natural  growth,  e.g.,  the  appearance 
of  new  sets  of  instincts  as  the  child  matures. 


220  EDWARD  GRACE  TOLMAN 

swallowing,  which  form  part  of  larger  wholes — in  this  example, 
eating — would  be  classed  in  the  second  group:  i.e.,  termed 
subordinate  acts.  The  members  of  this  group  are  almost 
infinitely  numerous.  The  leg  movements  of  walking,  the  hand- 
lings of  curiosity,  the  cries  and  shouts  and  strugglings  of  anger, 
the  sighing  and  tears  of  sorrow,  the  facial  expressions,  words 
and  gesticulations  of  love,  would  all  be  examples.  In  fact 
all  the  things  we  do,  not  as  separate  and  independent  reflexes, 
but  as  parts  of  bigger  groups  of  activity,  belong  to  this  second 
class. 

Finally  we  have  as  our  third  group  what  we  called  deter- 
mining adjustments.  These  are,  in  fact,  to  be  considered  as 
identical  with  the  internal  adjustments  just  described  in  our 
picture  of  the  slot-machine.  They  determine  and  set  in  readi- 
ness the  subordinate  acts.  Whether  one  responds  to  one  and 
the  same  stimulus  with  the  subordinate  acts  of  handling  and 
manipulation,  those  of  destruction,  or  those  of  rejection,  de- 
pends upon  which  particular  determining  adjustment  has  first 
been  aroused — whether  one  of  curiosity,  one  of  anger,  or  one 
of  fear. 

It  is  to  be  noted  that  determining  adjustments  often  occur 
in  hierarchies.  What  may  be  called  the  lowest  one  of  the 
hierarchy  is  then  the  immediate  determining  adjustment  for 
the  actual  subordinate  acts.  The  next  higher  one  of  the 
hierarchy  releases  this  lowest  one.  A  still  higher  one  releases 
that,  and  so  on.  For  example,  we  may  suppose  that  on  a 
given  occasion  an  individual's  leg  and  foot  movements  are 
directly  subordinate  to  what  may  be  called  the  walking  adjust- 
ment. This  walking  adjustment,  however,  we  may  assume  is 
subordinate  to  an  anger  adjustment.  (The  man  may  be  on 
his  way  to  confront  a  business  opponent.)  This  anger  adjust- 
ment will  then  be  subordinate  to  a  business  adjustment  and, 
finally,  this  business  adjustment  itself  may  be  assumed  to  be 
subordinate  to  what  may  be  called  the  man's  general  socio- 
domestic  adjustment.  In  the  case  of  such  a  hierarchy  of 
adjustments  it  is  obvious  that  the  function  of  all,  save  the 
lowest  one  in  the  sequence,  consists  in  a  release  of  a  lower 
determining  adjustment  rather  than  in  a  release  of  actual 
subordinate  acts. 


INSTINCT  AND  PURPOSE  221 

One  further  point.  In  the  case  of  activities  such  as  eating, 
running,  walking,  is  it  legitimate  to  talk  of  a  determining 
adjustment  as  something  existing  in  addition  to  the  individual 
walking  or  eating  movements  themselves?  The  reason  I  as- 
sume that  there  is  a  distinct  walking  adjustment  rather  than 
that  the  individual  walking  movements  are  released  directly 
by  the  next  higher  adjustment  (for  example,  the  anger  of  the 
above  illustration)  may  be  indicated  first  by  the  case  of  the 
child.  In  the  case  of  a  baby,  the  individual  walking  move- 
ments are  obviously  very  irregular  and  variable.  Yet  (when 
the  child  is  in  the  'walking  vein')  they  are  all  walking  move- 
ments: they  all  fall  within  that  one  general  class.  Now, 
wherever  these  two  phenomena  occur,  of  variability  within 
a  class  of  movements  and  persistence  of  the  class  as  a  whole, 
my  thesis  will  be  that  we  must  assume  a  specific  determining 
adjustment. 

In  an  adult  the  situation  (in  the  case  of  walking)  would 
seem  to  be  somewhat  different  because  of  the  added  influence 
of  habit.  With  the  advent  of  habit  there  come  fixed  and 
invariable  sequences  (in  the  case  of  walking,  fixed  and  invar- 
iable sequences  of  foot  and  leg  movements).  This  being  the 
case,  the  assumption  of  an  immediate  walking  adjustment  to 
release  and  maintain  walking  movements,  as  such,  would  not 
seem  so  necessary.  The  total  complex  of  movements  is  nearly 
equivalent  to  a  single  act  and  as  such  would  seem  a  candidate 
for  the  immediate  control  of  a  higher  adjustment,  such,  for  ex- 
ample, as  the  anger  of  the  preceding  illustration.  It  may  be 
noted,  however,  that  in  unusual  situations  such  as  unevenness 
or  obstacles  in  the  path,  this  unitary  and  automatized  character 
of  walking  may  break  down,  in  which  case  the  original  walking 
adjustment  would  seem  again  to  have  to  come  to  the  fore  to 
release  further  walking  movements  not  part  of  the  automatized 
act.1 

This   discussion   has   brought  out  three  important  points 

1  This  last  point,  however,  I  do  not  necessarily  desire  to  stress.  I  would  be  willing 
to  admit  the  possibility  that  with  the  growth  of  habits  the  original  determining  adjust- 
ment upon  which  these  habits  are  built  up  recedes  and  may  even  entirely  disappear 
(waning  of  instinct).  And,  if  such  is  the  case,  the  total  habit  becomes  an  alternative 
act  directly  at  the  service  of  higher  adjustments. 


322  EDWARD  CHACE   TOLMAN 

concerning  determining  adjustments  which  it  will  be  well  to 
summarize,  (i)  The  determining  adjustment  sets  in  readi- 
ness a  particular  group  of  subordinate  acts.  One  and  the 
same  external  or  internal  stimulus  may  call  out  quite  different 
groups  of  subordinate  acts  according  to  the  particular  deter- 
mining adjustment  which  happens  at  the  time  to  be  aroused. 
(2)  Determining  adjustments  often  occur  in  hierarchies,  the 
higher  ones  calling  out  the  lower  ones  and  the  lowest  one  of 
all  calling  out  the  actual  acts.  (3)  The  essence  of  the  deter- 
mining adjustment  and  the  reason  for  it  consists  in  the  varia- 
bility of  the  subordinate  acts.  If  such  variability  has  dis- 
appeared, as  is  the  case  where  habits  have  developed,  the 
determining  adjustment  tends  to  atrophy  and  may,  perhaps, 
even  disappear  altogether. 

Let  us  here  stop  and  assert  that  determining  adjustment 
'as  thus  characterized  is  a  definition  of  instinct. 

It  would  appear  that  such  a  definition  tends  to  differ 
primarily  from  most  others  by  virtue  of  its  two-level  conception 
(determining  adjustment  underneath,  subordinate  acts  on  top). 
Most  other  definitions  seem  to  reduce  in  the  last  analysis  to 
the  assumption  that  an  instinct  (on  the  objective  side  and 
before  learning  has  affected  it)  is  a  definite  and  stereotyped 
action  (i.e.,  that  it  is  an  inherited  reflex  pattern).1 

Two  authors,  however,  I  have  found  who  suggest  views 
similar  to  mine.  They  are  Woodworth2  and  Kempf.3  The 
former's  conception  of  'drive  and  mechanism,'  and  the  latter's 
'autonomic  and  projicient  systems,'  both  suggest  a  two-level 
account.4  My  idea  of  determining  adjustment  and  subordinate 

JTo  take  an  introspectionist  on  the  one  hand  and  a  behaviorist  on  the  other: 
such  a  view  seems  to  be  that  of  both  McDougall  and  Watson.  See  W.  McDougall, 
'Social  Psychology,'  p.  29  and  following,  and  J.  B.  Watson,  'Behavior,'  Chs.  IV.  and  VI. 

2  R.  S.  Woodworth,  'Dynamic  Psychology,'  Chap.  II. 

8  E.  J.  Kempf,' 'The  Autonomic  Functions  and  the  Personality,'  Nervous  and 
Mental  Disease  Monograph  Series,  No.  28.  See  also  an  article  by  G.  A.  de  Laguna, 
PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1919,  26,  especially  page  419,  for  a  discussion  of  emotion  significant 
for  the  present  theory. 

4  Woodworth  might  object  to  his  theory  being  called  two-level,  since  he  seems  to 
hold  that  one  and  the  same  apparatus  may  function  either  as  a  drive  or  mechanism 
according  to  circumstance  (i.f.,  that  the  difference  between  drive  and  mechanism  is 
functional  rather  than  structural).  But  from  the  point  of  view  of  function,  if  not 
structure,  his  is  a  two-level  theory. 


INSTINCT  AND  PURPOSE  223 

act  would  differ  from  either  of  theirs  only,  first,  in  leaving 
speculation  as  to  the  actual  mechanism  of  the  thing  open; 
and,  second,  and  most  importantly,  in  emphasizing  the  varia- 
bility among  the  subordinate  acts. 

It  is  this  variability  which  I  now  particularly  wish  to 
emphasize.  It  will  be  found  especially  significant  when  we 
turn  to  the  analysis  of  purpose. 

By  way  of  introduction  to  that  analysis,  let  me  now  quote 
two  concrete  descriptions  of  animal  behavior.  First  an  account 
of  nest  building  by  Prof.  Swindle.1  The  bird  observed  was  a 
male,  one  of  a  pair  of  Brazilian  birds,  in  a  large  outdoor  cage 
in  a  zoo. 

"Early  in  April,  I  noticed  that  as  this  bird  walked  about 
in  its  cage,  it  occasionally  bit  in  the  air  as  if  it  were  grasping 
an  object.  At  times,  however,  it  bit  the  bars  of  its  cage,  a 
branch  of  a  tree,  and  even  the  naked  earth.  Sometimes,  it 
sprang  and  ran  rapidly,  and  it  very  often  flew  to  a  one-and-a- 
half  meter  post  on  the  top  of  which  a  wide  shallow  basket  was 
fastened.  On  April  18,  1915,  the  following  movements  were 
observed:  The  bird  stood  at  first  motionless  in  the  basket, 
shortly  it  began  biting  in  the  air  as  if  attempting  to  seize 
something,  and  occasionally  it  seized,  lifted,  and  then  dropped 
certain  branches  which  lay  in  the  basket.  It  threw  a  stick 
out  of  the  basket  onto  the  ground,  gazed  for  a  few  seconds 
at  the  sky,  grabbed  still  another  twig  which  it  had  previously 
thrown  out  of  the  nest,  flew  back  into  the  basket  with  these,  beat 
them  quickly  here  and  there  without  releasing  them,  let  them 
fall  in  the  basket,  bit  and  arranged  them  there,  and  then 
remained  for  many  minutes  by  the  side  of  the  female  which 
was  then  also  in  the  basket.  Presently  the  male,  half-springing 
and  half-flying,  reached  the  ground,  ran  quickly  to  and  fro 
in  the  cage,  gazed  for  a  while  at  the  female  as  he  walked  round 
and  round  the  post,  and  finally  sprang  and  seized  a  twig  which 
projected  from  the  basket.  This  twig  was  unfortunately  so 
badly  tangled  with  the  others  of  the  nest  that  a  great  many 
were  drawn  out  with  it.  But  in  spite  of  the  fact  that  the  nest 
was  occasionally  mutilated  by  the  builder,  a  neat  nest  was 
eventually  constructed." 

1  E.  P.  Swindle,  Amer.  J.  of  Psychol.,  1919,  30,  180. 


224  EDWARD  CHACE   TOLMAN 

The  startling  thing  about  this  account  is  that  it  indicates 
that,  even  in  the  case  of  those  supposedly  perfectly  adaptive 
instinctive  activities  such  as  nest-building,  careful  observation 
may  show  a  considerable  amount,  and  in  this  case  indeed  a 
positively  shocking  amount,  of  variability,  the  very  point  we 
wish  to  emphasize.  If  the  reader  is  inclined  to  doubt  the 
validity  or  general  applicability  of  this  one  case,  I  may  quote 
a  word  or  two  more. 

The  author  says,  further:  "The  fact  deserves  emphasis 
that  birds  often  work  very  crudely  while  building  the  nest. 
It  is  really  astonishing  how  often  a  bird  allows  objects  of 
building  material  to  fall,  apparently  without  responding  further 
to  them.  A  bird  frequently  stands  or  walks  among  objects 
which  it  could  well  use  in  constructing  its  nest  but  suddenly 
runs  or  flies  away  without  grasping  any  of  them.  I  have 
observed  the  Blue  Jay  to  tear  the  leaves,  branches,  and  feathers 
from  another  bird's  nest  before  it  seized  an  object  of  the  foreign 
nest  and  flew  to  the  one  which  it  had  started;  and  it  often 
seemed  to  arrange  the  objects  on  the  foreign  nest  as  if  it  were 
preparing  to  deposit  its  own  eggs  there,  which  it  did  not  do."  l 

And,  again:  "Many  birds  can  build  their  nests  at  only 
certain  portions  of  the  trees  which  are  adapted  to  hold  the 
collected  objects,  and  generally,  these  places  are  located  by  the 
birds  only  after  a  number  of  trials.  That  this  fact  is  not  well 
known  seems  to  be  due  to  the  circumstance  that  it  is  very 
difficult  to  observe  a  bird  with  sufficient  scientific  accuracy  in 
freedom.  It  should  also  be  mentioned  in  this  connection  that 
birds  occasionally  start  two  or  three  nests  simultaneously  and 
later  destroy  some  of  them  to  obtain  the  material  for  a  single 
nest."  2 

Let  us  turn,  now,  to  our  second  case;  to  wit,  Prof.  Thorn- 
dike's  classical-  experiment  of  a  hungry  kitten  shut  up  in  a 
cage  with  food  outside.  We  quote  his  words:  "When  put 
into  the  box  the  cat  would  show  evident  signs  of  discomfort 
and  of  an  impulse  to  escape  from  confinement.  It  tries  to 
squeeze  through  any  opening;  it  claws  and  bites  at  the  bars 

1  Op.  cit.,  p.  178. 

2  Op.  cit.,  p.  183. 


INSTINCT  AND  PURPOSE  2*5 

or  wire;  it  thrusts  its  paws  out  through  any  opening  and  claws 
at  everything  loose  or  shaky;  it  may  claw  at  things  within 
the  box.  It  does  not  pay  very  much  attention  to  the  food 
outside,  but  seems  simply  to  strive  instinctively  to  escape  from 
confinement.  The  vigor  with  which  it  struggles  is  extraordi- 
nary. For  eight  or  ten  minutes  it  will  claw  and  bite  and 
squeeze  incessantly."  l  It  may  be  added  that  in  the  experi- 
ment as  arranged  by  Thorndike  the  kitten  usually  got  out 
eventually  because  one  of  its  strugglings  quite  accidentally 
hit  upon  a  release  mechanism  arranged  to  open  the  door. 
These  mechanisms  were  always  very  simple:  a  hanging  loop 
of  wire  which  required  but  the  slightest  clawing,  or  a  wooden 
latch  easily  lifted  by  the  nose.  It  is  to  be  observed  that  with 
the  opening  of  the  door,  a  new  final  act  occurred,  the  cat  went 
out  and  ate. 

I  draw  attention  to  the  significant  feature  of  both  illustra- 
tions, the  variable  or  random  character  of  the  subordinate  acts. 
In  the  one  case,  squeezings,  bitings,  clawings;  and  in  the  other, 
picking,  dropping,  carrying.  First  one  act  and  then  another 
occurs  in  a  perfectly  haphazard  order.  The  whole  thing  seems 
to  be  mere  chance. 

Let  us  stop,  however,  and  analyze  the  thing  further.  Is 
there  any  principle  underlying  the  actual  order  of  these,  to 
all  outward  appearances,  purely  random  acts?  It  must  be 
supposed  that  there  is.  To  return  to  our  slot-machine,  we 
must  suppose  that  each  one  of  them  is  set  off  by  some  particular 
penny,  if  we  could  but  detect  the  penny.  Now,  undoubtedly 
the  pennies  are  in  part  internal  conditions  such  as  the  senations 
arising  from  muscle  strain.  In  addition,  however,  it  is  equally 
certain  that  they  are  in  part  external  objects.  The  stimuli  to 
which  the  cat's  clawings,  biting,  etc.,  are  the  responses  are  in 
part  particular  features  of  the  cage  itself.  In  so  far  as  they 
are  such  features,  a  definite  principle  underlying  the  succession 
of  the  responses  can  be  actually  observed.  The  cat,  at  any 
given  instant,  responds  to  a  feature  of  the  cage  with  which  its 
just  previous  reaction  has  brought  it  in  contact.  In  other 
words,  it  carried  out  a  definite  train  of  movements.  One 

1  E.  L.  Thorndike,  'Animal  Intelligence,'  1911,  p.  35. 


226  EDWARD  CHACE  TOLMAN 

feature  of  the  cage  calls  out  one  response.  As  a  result  of  the 
movement  made  by  this  response  the  cat  is  brought  in  contact 
with  another  feature  of  the  cage.  This  new  feature  calls  out 
still  another  response  and  so  on.  If,  in  between  these  responses 
to  the  successive  parts  of  the  cage  as  such,  we  imagine  a  few 
responses  to  purely  internal  conditions,  we  shall  have  a  fairly 
exact  picture  of  the  cat's  total  behavior.  An  identical  account 
could  be  given  of  the  bird's  nest-building  activities.  Although 
to  all  outward  intents  the  acts  are  purely  haphazard  and 
random,  still  they  follow  definitely  traceable  sequences. 
Finally,  at  the  risk  of  hammering  the  point  to  excess,  we  may 
again  emphasize  that  in  each  case  the  particular  subordinate 
acts  are  what  they  are,  rather  than  other  equally  possible 
responses  to  the  same  stimuli,  by  virtue  of  the  particular 
sensitizing  effect  of  the  determining  adjustments. 

The  second  feature  about  the  process,  to  be  emphasized, 
is  that  the  individual  random  responses  continue  until  some 
one  of  them  presents  a  new  stimulus,  the  final  response  to 
which,  removes  the  condition  or  stimulus  which  was  the  original 
cause  of  the  determining  adjustment  itself.  In  the  case  of  the 
bird,  the  activity  continues  until  a  nest  eventually  gets  built. 
When  this  happens  we  have  a  new  stimulus,  the  completed 
nest.  And  the  responses  to  the  completed  nest,  those  of  laying 
and  setting,  are  such  as  to  remove  the  internal  physiological 
condition  which  was  the  original  cause  of  the  nest-building 
adjustment.  In  the  case  of  the  cat,  its  random  acts  eventually 
open  the  door,  whereupon  food  is  presented  and  the  response 
to  food  is  such  as  to  remove  the  internal  sensation  of  hunger 
which  was  the  stimulus  to  the  original  food-getting  adjustment. 
In  each  case  the  determining  adjustment  continues,  until  some 
of  its  subordinate  acts  removes  the  stimulus  and  with  it  the 
adjustment  itself. 

We  have  here  a  fundamental  phenomenon.  In  as  much 
as  only  one  act  will  remove  the  adjustment  and  the  adjustment 
continues  until  that  act  occurs  and  in  as  much  as  further  the 
adjustment  sensitizes  and  hence,  so  to  speak,  supplies  the 
group  of  acts  among  which  this  final  successful  one  appears, 
it  seems  to  me  that  we  have  a  situation  which  may  truly  be 


INSTINCT  AND  PURPOSE  2*7 

characterized  as  one  of  purpose.  A  determining  adjustment 
provides  the  purpose.  The  subordinate  acts  (which  the  adjust- 
ment sensitizes)  are  the  means  which  the  organism  adopts  to 
fulfill  that  purpose  and  the  removal  of  the  determining  adjust- 
ment itself  (as  a  result  of  one  of  these  subordinate  acts)  con- 
stitutes the  fulfillment  of  that  purpose. 

If  this  analysis  be  accepted,  then  the  goal  of  this  paper,  an 
objective  psychological  analysis  of  purpose,  is  in  sight.  All 
that  remains  to  be  done  is  to  transfer  the  account  to  man. 
Before  attempting  this  latter,  however,  let  me  draw  attention 
to  the  relation  between  this  definition  of  purpose,  and  that  of 
Professor  Perry.1 

In  Professor  Perry's  analysis  the  emphasis  is  put  upon 
learning,  upon  the  fact  that  with  repetition  the  cat  gradually 
learns  the  successful  act.  It  is  in  the  fact  that  the  successful 
act  is  selected  (learned)  and  the  other  acts  rejected,  that 
Professor  Perry  sees  the  primary  justification  for  calling  the 
situation  teleological.  I,  on  the  other  hand,  believe  that  even 
without  learning,  the  situation  is  teleological.  Even  though 
the  cat  showed  absolutely  no  evidence  of  learning  to  get  out 
in  a  shorter  time  on  succeeding  trials,  the  mere  fact  that  on 
each  single  trial  it  hits  about  until  it  gets  out,  seems  to  me  to 
be  sufficient  to  characterize  its  activity  as  purposive.  The 
cat  hits  about  in  order  to  get  out,  for  the  sake  of  getting  out — 
expressions  which  Professor  Perry  himself  designates  as  the 
'most  unmistakably  and  unqualifiedly  teleological  expressions 
in  common  use.' 

It  will  be  noted  that  such  situations  do  not  imply  anything 
essentially  non-mechanical.  Given  the  environment  and  the 
total  condition  of  the  organism,  the  complete  response  (i.e., 
the  particular  succession  of  subordinate  acts  and  the  time  of 
the  appearance  of  the  final  successful  one)  can  all  be  predicted 
in  a  wholly  deterministic  way.  This,  however,  is  no  criticism 
of  the  definition.  When  we  are  talking  mechanism  we  would 
be  very  much  upset  to  find  something  which  was  not  mechan- 
ical.2 

1R.  B.  Perry,  'Docility  and  Purpose,'  PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1918,  25,  1-20. 
1  It  should  be  emphasized  that  my  definition  differs  from  Prof.  Perry's  principally 
in  not  going  quite  so  far.    The  essential  idea  for  my  conception  was  for  the  most 


228  EDWARD  CHACE   TOLMAN 

To  return,  now,  to  our  further  problem:  we  wish  to  show 
how  this  mechanism  of  determining  adjustments  (or  instinct) 
and  subordinate  act  works  in  man.  One  preliminary  remark, 
however,  may  not  be  amiss.  In  the  preceding  descriptions 
we  spoke  as  if  the  random  strugglings  of  the  cat  or  the  bird 
always  ended  in  success.  As  if,  that  is,  when  the  activity 
ended,  it  was  always  because  a  response  was  finally  made  which 
removed  the  initiating  stimulus  for  the  determining  adjust- 
ment. But  such  an  ending,  though  from  the  point  of  view  of 
purpose  the  successful  one,  is  by  no  means  the  only  mechan- 
ically possible  one.  Instead  of  the  cat's  getting  out  and  eating 
the  food,  some  other  powerful  adjustment  may  intervene  and 
replace  the  food-getting.  Thus  it  may  become  frightened  by 
the  bruises  and  bumps  that  it  receives  as  a  result  of  its  strug- 
glings so  that  a.  fear  adjustment  gradually  sets  in  and  replaces 
the  original  food-getting  one.  Hence  when  the  door  finally 
does  open,  the  cat  either  continues  to  struggle  or  runs  off  and 
hides  instead  of  eating.  In  such  a  case  the  original  food-getting 
adjustment  has  not  been  satisfied  but  merely  replaced  by 
another.  A  second  way  in  which  the  original  determining 
adjustment  may  not  be  'satisfied'  may  be  as  a  result  of  exhaus- 
tion. The  cat  may  become  so  utterly  exhausted  that  all 
responses  cease  to  be  made.  'It  gives  up  trying.'  Only  if 
some  subordinate  act  takes  place  which  was  released  by  the  deter- 
mining adjustment  and  which  removes  the  stimulus  to  that  adjust- 
ment can  the  -purpose  as  such  be  said  to  be  fulfilled. 

Let  us  now  turn  to  man.  In  the  case  of  a  single  purpose  I 
believe  that  the  situation  is  essentially  identical  to  that  repre- 
sented by  the  cat  struggling  to  get  out  of  the  box  or  of  the  bird 
struggling  with  sticks  and  straws.  An  instinct  or  determining 
adjustment  is  aroused.  This  facilitates  and  sensitizes  one 
particular  class  of  subordinate  acts.  Some  one  or  group  of 
these,  if  they  occur,  remove  the  stimulus  to  the  original  instinct 
and,  if  they  do  thus  occur,  we  say,  speaking  in  purposive 

part  drawn  from  Perry's  discussion.  It  may  be  noted,  however,  that  determining 
adjustment  and  subordinate  acts,  though  analogous  to,  are  not  exactly  identical  with 
Professor  Perry's  'higher  propensity'  and  'lower  propensities.'  I  believe,  indeed, 
that  my  two  concepts  are,  for  the  purposes  of  behavioristic  treatment,  more  precise 
and  definite  than  his. 


INSTINCT  AND  PURPOSE  «9 

language,  that  our  problem  has  been  solved,  that  the  right 
means  have  been  chosen. 

We  may  make  the  issue  more  concrete  by  an  example. 
Imagine  a  man  trapped  in  a  burning  hotel.  He  may  rush 
madly  about  in  the  same  blind  fashion  as  does  the  cat  in  the 
cage.  If  so,  his  behavior  and  that  of  the  cat  would  seem  to  be 
entirely  identical.  It  may  happen,  however,  that  instead  of 
thus  rushing  blindly  he  stops  to  think.  If  such  be  the  case, 
he  does  not  attack  all  the  exits  of  his  trap  indiscriminately, 
but  only  some  one  which  is  apparently  suggested  to  him  by  his 
'thoughts.'  We  have  in  these  thoughts  a  new  principle  which 
does  not  hold  or,  if  so,  to  an  infinitesimal  extent  in  the  case 
of  the  cat. 

What,  now,  we  may  ask,  is  this  thought  and  when  and 
why  does  it  occur?  It  will  be  remembered  that  in  the  initial 
statement  of  our  program  we  declared  that  it  was  an  objective, 
behavioristic  account  rather  than  an  internal  subjective  one 
that  we  should  aim  to  achieve;  that  we  were  interested  not 
in  how  purposes  felt,  but  in  how  they  worked.  Can  we,  now, 
shift  our  point  of  view  and  begin  to  talk  about  apparently 
internal  subjective  things  such  as  thoughts?  My  answer  is 
that  thoughts,  or  at  least  the  kind  of  thought  with  which  we 
are  here  concerned,  can  be  conceived  from  an  objective  point 
of  view  as  consisting  in  internal  presentations  to  the  organism 
(on  a  basis  of  memory  and  association)  of  stimuli  not  actually 
present  but  which  would  be  present,  if  some  hypothesized 
action  were  carried  out.  Such  a  definition  says  nothing  about 
the  subjective  'immediate-feel'  side  of  thoughts  as  such.  It 
is  concerned  with  thought  simply  in  so  far  as  the  latter  has 
significance  in  an  objective,  behavioristic,  stimulus  and  response 
account.  A  complete  treatment  of  thought  on  its  subjective 
(immediate-feel)  side  and  of  its  epistemological  significance 
we  can  leave  to  the  combined  researches  of  introspective 
psychologist  and  philosopher.1  The  one  point  we  here  mean 

1  In  what  follows  I  present  one  sample  of  the  way  in  which  'thoughts'  may,  it 
seems  to  me,  be  properly  introduced  into  what  claims  to  be  a  purely  behavioristic 
(stimulus  and  response)  account.  It  is  my  belief  that  such  examples  might  be  indefi- 
nitely multiplied  and  that  a  whole  system,  properly  to  be  called  behavioristic  psychol- 
ogy, might  be  built  up  in  which  thoughts  (on  their  behavioristic  side)  would  still  find 
as  much  place  as  do  sense-stimuli. 


23°  EDWARD  CHACE   TOLMAN 

to  make  is  that  over  and  above  whatever  these  functionaries 
may  have  to  say,  a  significant  behavioristic  aspect  of  thought 
still  remains. 

To  return  to  our  definition  itself.  What  we  mean  by 
thought  in  this  particular  case  as  'an  internal  presentation  to 
the  organism  (on  the  basis  of  memory  and  association)  of 
stimuli  not  actually  present  but  which  would  be  present,  if 
some  hypothesized  action  were  carried  out,'  can  be  made  clear 
perhaps,  only  by  a  concrete  example.  We  come  back  to  our 
man  in  the  hotel.  Instead  of  trying  all  possible  parts  of  his 
burning  trap,  we  find  him  stopping  to  think  and  then  on  the 
basis  of  that  thought  reacting  to  certain  parts  only.  What  is 
this  stopping  to  think  in  behavioristic  terms?  It  consists, 
I  would  assert,  in  what  may  well  be  called,  not  random  sub- 
ordinate acts,  but  random  subordinate  thoughts-of-acts. 

You  will  remember  that  the  cat  reacted  to  a  part  of  the 
cage  with  which  the  just  preceding  response  had  brought  him 
in  contact.  As  a  result  of  each  successive  response  the  cat 
was  automatically  provided  with  a  stimulus  for  another  re- 
sponse. How  now  in  the  case  of  the  man?  He  sees  a  door 
but  instead  of  actually  responding,  he  merely  thinks  of  re- 
sponding. He  hypothesizes  a  response  and  on  the  basis  of  this 
hypothesized  response  he  achieves  mentally,  a  new  stimulus, 
i.e.,  the  mental  image  of  what  is  beyond  the  door.  (This 
mental  image  is  provided  by  memory  or  association.  He  may 
actually  remember  that  this  door  leads  to  a  corridor  or  merely 
by  association  based  upon  the  general  position  be  merely  led 
to  imagine  that  it  leads  to  a  corridor.)  In  either  case  this 
idea  or  mental  image  of  what  is  beyond  acts  as  a  stimulus  to 
a  new  thought-of-act.  He  thinks  of  going  down  the  corridor 
and  this  will  lead,  mentally,  to  still  a  new  stimulus  of  what  is 
at  the  end  of  the  corridor,  perhaps  stairs  or  an  elevator.  These 
will  lead  in  a  flash  to  a  mental  image  of  an  open  road  to  the 
outside.  When  the  image  of  the  latter  occurs  he  will  in  all 
probability  actually  react.  If  no  such  vision  of  an  open  road 
beyond  stairs  or  elevator  occurs,  he  will  mentally  rush  back, 
or  perhaps  more  truly  speaking  jump  back,  to  his  starting  point 
and  mentally  attack  some  other  feature  of  his  environment. 


INSTINCT  AND  PURPOSE  231 

One  point  in  need  of  immediate  further  elucidation  emerges. 
Why  is  it  that  the  man  thinks  in  the  first  place?  We  have 
already  said  that  sometimes  he  does  not  think  but  merely 
rushes  blindly  about  as  does  the  cat.  Stopping  to  examine 
the  matter  more  carefully,  it  would  seem  that  those  times 
when  he  does  not  think,  but  does  thus  rush  blindly  about,  are 
times  when  he  is  excessively  frightened.  Occasions,  in  short, 
when  the  original  determining  adjustment  is  especially  potent. 
If,  therefore,  a  particularly  potent  adjustment  produces  action, 
I  should  suggest  that  when  action  does  not  occur,  it  is  when 
some  inhibiting  or  checking  process  which  works  against  or 
controls  the  determining  adjustment  is  also  acting.  Just  what, 
physiologically,  this  inhibiting  or  checking  process  may  be, 
I  shall  not  venture  to  say,  though  I  shall  assume  that  like  all 
other  physiological  processes  it  follows  perfectly  definite  me- 
chanical laws.  The  significant  thing,  for  us,  is  simply  that  it 
works  against  the  determining  adjustment  in  such  a  way  as 
to  shunt  the  latter's  activities,  so  that  instead  of  producing 
subordinate  acts,  it,  the  determining  adjustment,  produces 
merely  though ts-of-acts.  For  this  reason,  let  us  call  it  the 
thinking  or  rationalizing  adjustment.  We  may  note  in  passing 
several  interesting  things  about  this  tendency.  First  it  seems 
to  be  much  stronger  in  some  individuals  than  in  others  and 
secondly,  to  be  very  much  subject  to  training  and  practice. 
In  fact  it  can  sometimes  be  so  over-trained  as  to  result  in  an 
almost  complete  inability  to  act  at  all,  a  condition  which  is 
sometimes  supposed  to  be  characteristic  of  the  typical  college 
professor. 

We  may  now  ask,  how  is  it  that  this  thinking,  rationalizing 
tendency,  having  once  got  going,  ever  ceases,  in  order  to  allow 
action  to  take  place.  In  answer,  we  would  posit  the  general 
principle  that  action  eventually  occurs  because  of  what  we  shall 
call  a  prepotent  stimulus.  A  stimulus  may  be  prepotent  for 
either  of  two  reasons:  (a)  because  it  is  the  stimulus  to  an 
act  to  which  the  original  determining  is  particularly  favorable 
or  (b)  because  it  releases  some  other  favorable  adjustment.  To 
return  to  the  example  of  the  man  in  the  hotel.  The  first  case 
would  be  represented  when  as  a  result  of  his  trains  of  thoughts- 


232  EDWARD  CHACE   TOLMAN 

of-acts  he  arrives  at  the  mental  image  of  open  road  beyond 
stairs  or  elevator.  Such  a  sight  of  the  outside,  if  present  in 
perception,  would  be  the  one  stimulus  to  which  the  man  would 
have  been  most  sensitive.  If  the  door  in  the  cat's  cage  had 
been  left  open,  the  response  of  going  out  would  have  been 
first  to  occur.  It  would  have  taken  precedence  over  all  other 
responses  such  as  those  of  squeezing,  clawing,  biting.  So,  here, 
the  thought  of  the  open  road  beyond  stairs  or  elevator  is  the 
stimulus  to  which  the  given  determining  adjustment  makes  the 
man  most  susceptible,  so  susceptible  in  fact  that  the  impulse  is 
enough  to  break  down  the  inhibiting  effect  of  the  thinking 
propensity  and  action  results. 

Turn,  now,  to  the  second  way  in  which  the  stimulus  may 
be  prepotent:    the  case  in  which  it  is  prepotent  because  it 
releases  a  second  adjustment  favorable  to  the  given  action  in 
addition  to  the  original  adjustment.     Suppose  that  as  a  result 
of  social  intercourse  our  man  had  acquired  a  general  maxim 
to  the  effect  that  stairs  and  elevators  become  perfect  sr^u~ 
stacks  and  that  much  the  best  thing  to  do  in  case  of  fire  is  to 
run  to  the  window  and  call  for  help.     Simply  on  the  basis  of 
his  original  determining  adjustment  alone  the  thought  c 
window  would  tend  to  call  out  the  subordinate  act  of 
and  calling.     If,  now,  in  addition  such  an  act  is  support  d  by 
what  we  may  call  a  general  'social-subservience'  adjustment, 
a  tendency  to  do  those  acts  recommended  by  society,  this  act 
becomes  doubly  ready  to  go  off,  so  much  so  that  it  does  actually 
occur. 

To  sum  up:  thought  ceases  and  action  supervenes  when- 
ever thought  arrives  at  the  image  of  a  prepotent  stimulus. 
And  a  stimulus  is  prepotent  either  (a)  because  it  tends  to  call 
out  a  subordinate  act  which  is  especially  favored  by  the  original 
determining  adjustment  or  (V)  because  it  tends  to  call  out  in 
addition  to  the  original  determining  adjustment  some  other 
adjustment  which  is  also  favorable  to  the  act. 

This  is  all  there  is  to  a  case  of  single  purpose.1  An  original 
determining  adjustment  provides  the  purpose.  Subordinate 

1  The  problem  of  what  happens  in  the  case  of  a  conflict  of  purposes  is  more  com- 
plex, but  the  general  principles  of  explanation  would  be  the  same. 


INSTINCT  AND  PURPOSE 

acts  are  either  actually  called  out  or  merely  thought  of. 
Eventually  one  occurs  which  removes  the  stimulus  to  the 
determining  adjustment  and  the  purpose  is  satisfied.  Or,  if  no 
such  subordinate  act  occurs,  it  remains  unsatisfied  until,  per- 
haps, mere  exhaustion  causes  the  determining  adjustment  to 
disappear. 

In  conclusion,  we  may  briefly  enumerate  the  more  impor- 
tant points  we  have  advanced  and  which  we  most  wish  to 
emphasize:  (i)  a  two-level  (i.e.,  determining  adjustment — 
subordinate  act)  theory  of  instinct;  (2)  Purpose  as  interaction 
of  determining  adjustment  and  subordinate  acts;  (3)  images 
of  memory  and  imagination  (thoughts)  as  properly  included 
in  a  behavioristic  non-introspective  account;  (4)  the  satis- 
faction of  purpose  as  consisting  in  the  removal  of  the  stimulus 
to  the  determining  adjustment  as  a  result  of  one  of  the  sub- 
ordinate acts  which  the  determining  adjustment  itself  releases. 


BRAIN  MECHANISMS  AND  MENTAL  IMAGES 

BY  S.  BENT  RUSSELL 
St.  Louis,  Mo. 

When  you  think  of  an  absent  friend  you  may  seem  for  an 
instant  to  see  his  face,  i.e.,  you  have  a  mental  image  of  his  face. 
This  is  commonly  said  to  be  due  to  memory.  But  what  then 
is  memory?  There  may  be  readers  of  this  article  who  have 
considered  memory  only  from  the  subjective  point  of  view. 
Let  us  for  the  moment  now  consider  memory  apart  from  the 
matter  of  images  and  consider  it  from  the  objective  point  of 
view.  It  can  be  shown  that  memory  is  accounted  for  by  the 
operation  of  nerve  processes.  There  are  pathways  along  nerve 
fibers  for  nervous  impulses.  Some  of  these  are  known  as 
association  pathways.  There  is  good  reason  to  believe  that 
changes  of  resistance  at  the  points  of  junction  between  nerve 
fibers  known  as  synapses,  determine  the  course  of  nervous 
impulses  along  one  path  or  another.  The  frequency  and  re- 
cency of  previous  impulses  determines  the  synaptic  resistance. 
Hence  the  nerve  paths  are  developed  by  individual  experience 
and  thus  memory  is  evolved. 

The  dual  common  path  theory  furnishes  an  explanation  of 
associative  memory.  The  common  path  is  open  to  impulses 
coming  from  two  tributary  or  private  paths.  An  impulse 
from  one  lowers  the  synaptic  resistance  for  an  impulse  from 
the  other.  We  need  not  go  further  into  this  theory  in  this 
discussion.  Let  us  take  it  as  an  explanation  of  associative 
memory  for  the  purposes  of  this  demonstration. 

Before  you  can  have  a  memory  image  of  an  object  you  must 
at  one  time  be  conscious  of  the  object  itself.  Let  us  consider 
briefly  how  perception  can  be  explained  in  terms  of  nerve 
processes.  A  man  is  never  conscious  of  an  object  unless  there 
be  communication  from  the  object  to  his  brain.  We  may  say 
further  that  there  must  also  be  a  molecular  change  at  some 
brain  center  or  centers  that  bears  a  correspondence  to  the 
234 


BRAIN  MECHANISMS  AND  MENTAL  IMAGES 

object.  In  other  words,  the  object  causes  a  nerve  impulse  from 
a  sense  organ  to  a  brain  center  and  the  impulse  causes  a 
response  (molecular)  at  the  brain  center.  To  mention  a  special 
case,  when  a  point  on  the  retina  is  stimulated  by  a  ray  of 
light  from  some  object,  there  is  an  impulse  sent  by  way  of  a 
certain  nerve  fiber  to  a  certain  nerve  center  in  the  cerebral 
cortex,  where  it  provokes  a  molecular  response  that  corresponds 
to  the  retinal  stimulation.  We  see  that  each  visible  point  of 
the  object  has  a  line  of  communication  by  way  of  the  retina 
and  a  particular  nerve  fiber  to  a  brain  center.  All  the  points 
together  produce  a  pattern  molecular  response  in  the  brain. 
This  joint  response  simulates  the  object  in  view. 

Let  us  for  convenience  use  the  term  'mimetic  response'  to 
express  the  molecular  response  that  simulates  the  object  as 
represented  at  a  sense  organ.1 

To  put  it  another  way,  there  is  a  registering  mechanism  in 
the  brain  center  that  transforms  the  afferent  impulse  into  light 
equivalent,  heat  equivalent  or  other  sensation  equivalent  as 
the  case  may  be.  That  is,  it  in  effect  reverses  the  transforma- 
tion that  occurred  in  the  sense  organ.  When  a  ray  of  red 
light  for  example  falls  on  the  retina,  there  is  a  change  in  the 
brain  center  the  same  as  if  a  red  light  had  penetrated  it. 
Let  us  term  this  hypothesis  'the  mimetic  theory  of  percep- 
tion.' 

This  explanation  of  perception  is  not  complete  unless  we 
make  allowance  for  the  effect  of  association  mechanisms.  You 
will  see  this  if  you  think  of  a  trained  musician  listening  to  a 
well-known  melody  on  one  hand,  and  a  man  without  any 
musical  training  listening  to  the  same  melody  for  the  first  time 
on  the  other  hand.  The  brain  correspondence  will  be  far 
greater  in  the  former  case.  Every  individual  has  to  be  trained 
to  see  and  hear  things  as  they  are.  Brain  correspondence 
increases  with  knowledge,  i.e.,  with  the  development  of  associa- 

1  The  writer  has  presented  an  explanation  of  mechanisms  of  associative  memory 
and  of  their  functions  in  intelligent  and  purposive  behavior  and  in  consciousness  in 
the  following  articles  in  the  PSYCHOLOGICAL  REVIEW.  'The  Effect  of  High  Resistance 
in  Common  Nerve  Paths,'  1916,  23,  231-236.  'Compound  Substitution  in  Behavior,' 
1917,  24, 62-73.  'Advance  Adaptation  in  Behavior,'  1917,  24,  413-425.  '  Communica- 
tion, Correspondence  and  Consciousness,'  1918,  25,  341-358. 


236  S.  BENT  RUSSELL 

tion  mechanisms.  In  other  words,  a  man's  habits  determine 
the  definiteness  of  his  perception.1 

We  must  also  make  allowance  for  the  effect  of  language  and 
other  forms  of  expression  upon  perception.  Naming  and  num- 
bering are  great  helps  in  perception.  In  learning  to  describe 
his  environment,  a  man  develops  association  nerve  paths  that 
serve  to  increase  his  brain  correspondence  with  the  world 
he  lives  in. 

Keeping  these  matters  in  mind,  we  can  say  we  have  in  the 
mimetic  theory,  a  satisfactory  explanation  of  consciousness 
as  it  reflects  a  man's  present  environment.  The  purpose  of 
this  discussion  is  to  bring  out  an  explanation  of  the  memory 
image  in  terms  of  nerve  processes.  Before  attacking  the  prob- 
lem, let  us  note  the  difficulties  we  have  to  meet.  It  is  not  so 
hard  to  conceive  how  a  ray  of  red  light  can  cause  a  disturbance 
in  a  brain  center  that  is  characteristic  of  redness  as  it  is  to 
conceive  of  a  nerve  impulse  aroused  in  the  ear  by  the  sound  of 
the  word  red,  for  example,  producing  a  disturbance  in  a  brain 
center  that  is  so  characteristic  of  redness  that  the  subject  will 
for  an  instant  see  a  red  color  in  his  mind.  That  is,  he  is  con- 
scious of  red  when  there  is  in  reality  no  red  to  be  seen.  There 
is,  you  will  allow,  an  apparent  paradox.  Why  should  an 
impulse  coming  from  the  ear,  arouse  an  image  of  light?  We 
can  think  of  a  ray  of  red  light  penetrating  a  brain  center  and 
causing  a  characteristic  molecular  disturbance  like  a  light  ray 
acting  on  a  photographic  plate.  We  can  go  another  step  and 
think  of  a  ray  of  red  light  stimulating  a  sensory  nerve  ending 
and  so  causing  a  nerve  impulse  which  goes  to  the  brain  center 
and  by  aid  of  a  special  mechanism  reproduces  there  the  dis- 
turbance at  the  sensory  ending  caused  by  the  red  ray  and 
characteristic  of  redness.  But  why  should  some  other  kind  of 
stimulus  produce  a  molecular  disturbance  that  has  a  quality 
belonging  to  red? 

In  other  words,  if  we  seek  explanations  in  terms  of  nerve 
processes,  the  one  for  consciousness  of  the  past  is  far  more 
difficult  than  that  for  consciousness  of  the  present. 

On  account  of  the  obvious  resemblance,  the  memory  image 

1 W.  B.  Pillsbury,  'The  Essentials  of  Psychology,'  1911,  p.  157. 


BRAIN  MECHANISMS  AND  MENTAL  IMAGES  237 

is  often  considered  as  composed  of  sensations  that  are  centrally 
aroused  instead  of  coming  from  the  effect  of  the  environment 
acting  directly  as  in  perception.  In  these  terms  we  would 
note  that  an  explanation  of  a  centrally  aroused  sensation  by 
nerve  processes  is  by  no  means  as  simple  as  in  the  case  of  a 
true  sensation.  If  the  reader  can  see  the  point  of  difficulty 
it  will  help  him  grasp  the  demonstration  given  herein. 

As  the  next  step  let  us  take  for  illustration  the  case  of  a 
young  man  of  normal  mind  sitting  in  a  boat  and  drifting  down 
a  river.  As  he  drifts  along  he  observes  different  objects  along 
the  bank  and  of  course  is  conscious  of  each  in  turn.  Let  us 
say  it  is  the  second  time  he  has  made  this  voyage.  He  will 
have  from  time  to  time  mental  images  of  objects  that  have 
passed  out  of  view  and  sometimes  he  will  have  an  image  of 
an  object  ahead  of  him  that  will  soon  come  into  view.  Suppose 
at  one  time  he  passes  a  gravel  bar  on  which  he  sees  a  flock  of 
white  cranes.  Later  on  he  passes  another  gravel  bar  and  has 
a  memory  image  of  the  white  cranes.  At  one  time  he  passes 
under  a  railroad  bridge  and  is  startled  by  the  roar  of  a  train. 
Later  on  he  passes  another  bridge  and  has  a  memory  image  of 
the  roar.  Let  us  see  if  we  can  find  an  explanation  of  these 
memory  images  in  terms  of  nervous  mechanisms. 

In  a  book  published  some  years  ago,  Professor  Kirkpatrick 
describes  images  as  the  result  of  the  functioning  of  brain  centers 
that  are  made  active  in  perception  by  impulses  coming  from 
sensory  centers,  while  in  imaging  they  are  made  active  by 
impulses  coming  from  some  other  direction.1  The  theory  that 
will  now  be  advanced  does  not  conflict  with  Dr.  Kirkpatrick's 
view. 

Returning  to  our  illustration,  when  the  man  observes  an 
object  in  the  first  instance,  there  is,  as  we  have  already  stated, 
a  molecular  change  in  the  cerebral  cortex  'that  simulates  the 
object  and  which  we  term  the  mimetic  response.  That  is 
not  the  whole  story,  however,  as  there  is  another  process  too. 
In  the  case  of  vision  for  example,  the  mimetic  response  only 
lasts  while  the  retina  is  stimulated  by  the  object  or  for  a 
moment  more.  There  is  a  second  process  that  is  a  recording 

1  E.  A.  Kirkpatrick,  'Genetic  Psychology,'  1909. 


238  S.  BENT  RUSSELL 

process.  Let  us  call  this  record  making  process  the  'tuning 
process.'  It  is  a  specific  molecular  change  that  is  more  perma- 
nent than  the  mimetic  response.  There  is  one  tuning  process 
for  light,  one  for  sound,  one  for  heat,  etc.  After  the  tuning 
process  has  occurred  in  a  certain  center,  any  nerve  impulse 
that  reaches  the  center  will  cause  a  molecular  disturbance 
that  simulates  the  original  stimulus  disturbance  in  the  sense 
organ.  In  this  way  we  have  correspondence  of  a  brain  center 
with  a  past  environment.  This  simulating  process  in  the 
nerve  center  is,  we  will  say,  a  conditioned  molecular  response. 
Let  us  term  it  the  'sounder  response.' 

In  our  illustration  when  the  man  is  conscious  of  his  present 
environment,  there  is  a  series  or  procession  of  impulses  through 
certain  brain  centers.  In  other  words  the  mimetic  response  is 
a  series  of  molecular  changes  in  the  brain  centers  that  bears  a 
correspondence  to  the  environment.  The  tuning  process  is 
also  a  series  of  molecular  changes  that  bears  a  correspondence 
to  the  environment.  At  the  same  time  it  leaves  an  impression 
on  the  molecular  structure  that  also  bears  a  correspondence 
to  the  environment.  We  may  liken  the  mimetic  response  to  a 
gust  of  wind  passing  over  a  sheet  of  water  and  causing  a 
ripple  that  is  soon  gone  and  we  may  liken  the  tuning  process 
to  a  gust  of  wind  passing  over  a  smooth  sand  bed  and  leaving 
the  familiar  ripple  marks  that  remain  for  a  time. 

The  sounder  response  is  conditioned  by  the  tuning  process. 
It  is  a  series  of  molecular  changes  that  bears  a  correspondence 
to  the  environment  that  caused  the  tuning  process.  There 
must  of  course  be  a  specific  sounder  response  that  corresponds 
to  light  and  another  that  corresponds  to  heat  and  another  for 
sound  and  another  for  taste,  etc.  When  a  man  has  a  memory 
image  of  a  noise  he  heard  a  minute  ago,  there  is  in  one  of  his 
brain  centers  a  "sounder  response  that  is  provoked  by  a  nerve 
impulse  coming,  we  will  say  from  some  association  nerve  path. 
The  effect  is  the  same  as  if  there  were  communication  from  the 
noise-making  object  to  the  brain  center  that  took  a  minute 
to  reach  the  brain  center.  It  is  something  like  the  thunder  peal 
that  reaches  the  ear  some  seconds  after  the  lightning  stroke 
that  made  it. 


BRAIN  MECHANISMS  AND  MENTAL  IMAGES  239 

In  the  same  way  when  a  man  has  a  memory  image  of  an 
object  that  has  recently  passed  out  of  view,  there  is  in  one  of 
his  brain  centers  a  sounder  response  that  is  provoked  by  an 
impulse  from  some  association  nerve  path.  The  effect  is  the 
same  as  if  the  object  were  still  in  communication  with  his  brain. 
In  his  mind's  eye  he  sees  perhaps  a  red  triangle  although  there 
is  no  red  triangle  now  present  to  stimulate  his  organs  of  vision. 

Let  us  now  consider  the  tuning  process  again.  A  harp 
string  can  be  tuned  by  turning  the  peg  that  holds  it  and  thus 
changing  the  tension.  With  a  given  string  a  certain  tension 
will  produce  a  certain  note,  say  C.  Now  a  certain  tension 
means  a  certain  relation  of  the  molecules  to  each  other.  The 
tuning  operation  produces  a  certain  molecular  arrangement 
that  corresponds  to  the  note  C.  As  long  as  this  molecular 
arrangement  is  preserved  the  string  when  struck  will  give  the 
sound  of  C.  The  note  C  is  of  course  a  vibration  at  a  certain 
rate  and  thus  we  see  the  molecules  are  so  arranged  by  the 
tuning  operation  as  to  give  when  struck,  a  certain  response. 
We  may  use  the  harp  string  as  an  illustration  of  a  brain  center. 
We  may  suppose  that  a  nerve  mechanism  exists  by  which  a 
certain  brain  center  can  be  brought  into  a  certain  molecular 
arrangement  so  that  thereafter  any  nerve  impulse  will  produce 
a  particular  response  or  movement. 

The  tuning  process  is,  we  have  stated,  a  change  in  the 
molecular  structure.  We  may  compare  it  to  the  alteration  in 
litmus  paper  that  is  changed  in  color  from  red  to  blue  when 
it  is  wet  with  an  alkaline  liquid.  We  note  that  after  the  change 
the  paper  gives  off  blue  rays  when  exposed  to  light.  We  may 
also  compare  the  tuning  process  to  the  case  of  paper  that  is 
tinted  with  some  color  that  is  not  fast.  If  a  ray  of  sunlight 
falls  on  it,  a  faded  spot  remains  that  will  be  seen  whenever 
there  is  any  light  on  the  paper  and  so  is  a  sort  of  memory 
image  of  the  sunlight  ray.  Hence  we  may  think  of  a  bright 
object  in  view  of  a  man  as  causing  a  little  faded  spot  in  his 
brain  that  is  brought  out  by  any  passing  nerve  impulse  that 
comes  later  on. 

Let  us  remember  that  the  man  is  never  conscious  of  the 
mimetic  response  or  the  sounder  response.  He  is  conscious 


240 


S.  BENT  RUSSELL 


of  the  object  itself  that  furnished  the  stimulus,  whether  it  be 
in  the  present  or  past  environment.  In  the  case  of  an  image, 
the  effect  on  consciousness  is  the  same  in  kind  as  if  the  object 
were  still  in  communication  with  the  brain  center. 

It  may  make  these  explanations  more  clear  to  you  if  they 
are  illustrated  by  a  diagram  or  table  like  the  one  below. 
Let  the  features  of  the  object  seen  in  the  first  instance  be 
represented  by  the  letters  A,  B,  C,  D,  E,  and  the  impression 
on  the  retina  be  represented  by  the  letters  Ai,  Bi,  Ci,  Di,  Ei, 
and  the  mimetic  response  by  A2,  B2,  C2,  etc.,  and  the  tuning 
process  by  A3,  63,  C3,  etc.,  and  the  sounder  response  by 
A4,  64,  C4,  etc.  The  table  follows : 


Object  

A 

B 

c 

D 

E 

Object 

Retinal  image  

Ai 

Bi 

Ci 

Di 

Ei 

Mimetic  response  

A2 

B2 

Cz 

D2 

£2 

Perception 

Tuning  process  

A3 

BS 

Cs 

D-j 

Ei 

Sounder  response  

* 
A* 

3 

rj 

D4 

FI 

Mental  image 

Let  us  now  go  back  to  our  case  of  the  man  drifting  down 
the  river.  We  will  take  the  experience  of  the  bridges.  There 
is  a  certain  center  in  the  man's  brain  that  is  reached  by  a 
certain  nerve  path  coming  from  the  ear.  It  is  also  reached 
by  a  certain  association  path  that  has  one  connection  with  the 
ear  and  one  with  the  eye.  When  the  man  sees  the  first  bridge, 
there  is  an  impulse  from  the  eye  via  the  association  path  and 
when  he  hears  the  roar  of  the  train  there  is  an  impulse  from 
the  ear  via  the  association  path  and  one  via  the  other  path 
from  the  ear.  The  sound  impulses  cause  a  tuning  process  in 
the  brain  center.  Later  on  the  man  observes  the  second 
bridge  and  there  is  an  impulse  from  the  eye  that  follows  the 
association  path  more  easily  as  it  is  now  more  open  because 
the  two  impulses  in  succession,  caused  by  the  experience  at 
the  first  bridge,  have  made  it  so.  When  the  impulse  reaches 
the  brain  center,  there  is  a  conditioned  molecular  response 
and  the  man  has  a  sound  image  of  the  train  roar  at  the  first 
bridge.  Please  note  that  the  response  simulates  a  sound  al- 
though the  provoking  impulse  originates  in  the  eye.  This  is 
the  apparent  paradox  that  we  remarked  in  the  beginning. 


BRAIN  MECHANISMS  AND  MENTAL  IMAGES  M1 

You  may  comprehend  the  case  better  when  you  see  it 
presented  in  a  diagram  as  in  Fig.  I.  The  circle  V  represents 
the  visual  organ,  the  circle  A^  the  auditory  organ  and  the  circle 
R,  the  brain  center.  At  the  sight  of  the  first  bridge  an  impulse 
travels  from  the  eye  at  V  by  the  dotted  line  path  C  to  the 
center  at  R.  The  roar  of  the  train  sends  a  second  impulse 
from  the  ear  at  A  by  the  common  path  C 
to  R,  and  a  third  impulse  by  the  dotted 
line  path  B  to  R.  The  last  two  impulses 
provoke  a  tuning  process  in  R.  After  the 
first  and  second  impulses  have  passed  over 
path  C  it  is  more  open  to  later  impulses. 
The  sight  of  the  second  bridge  later  on 
sends  an  impulse  from  the  eye  at  V  by  the 
path  C  as  shown  by  a  heavy  line,  to  the 
brain  center  R.  There  is  now  a  sounder 
response  at  R  that  simulates  the  roar  of  the  train  at  the  first 
bridge.  A  path  line  on  the  diagram  of  course  represents  a 
plural  number  of  nerve  fibers. 

On  consideration  you  will  find  that  the  explanation  just 
given  for  a  particular  case  will  answer  for  all  memory  images. 
There  are  many  cases  of  course,  where  a  large  number  of 
association  nerve  paths  are  required  to  produce  a  definite 
memory  image.  The  larger  the  number,  the  higher  will  be 
the  degree  of  correspondence  with  the  environment  at  the 
time  of  observation. 

The  association  nerve  paths  must  be  developed  by  indi- 
vidual experience.  A  baby  cannot  have  mental  images  like 
an  older  person.  A  baby  must  learn  to  talk  before  he  can 
hear  words  in  his  mind.  He  must  learn  to  sing  before  he  can 
hear  a  song  in  his  mind.  He  can  only  coordinate  impressions 
that  have  become  familiar.  He  learns  to  form  images  step  by 
step.  He  must  learn  to  walk  before  he  can  image  distance 
relations  and  space  relations.  We  have  previously  observed 
that  perception  is  determined  by  a  man's  habits  to  an  important 
extent  and  the  same  thing  is  true  of  mental  images.  The 
study  of  language  and  expression,  also,  must  have  an  important 
effect  in  developing  the  mechanisms  for  making  mental  images. 


242  S.   BENT  RUSSELL 

A  man  who  has  learned  how  to  write  a  good  description  of  a 
landscape  has  no  doubt  increased  the  definiteness  of  his  mental 
images.  You  are  perhaps  able  to  look  at  a  new  model  of  an 
aeroplane  and  memorize  it  so  as  to  have  a  good  memory  image 
of  it  a  week  afterwards  and  have  never  remarked  that  your 
ability  to  do  this  is  the  result  of  long  and  repeated  practice  on 
similar  objects.  On  consideration  you  will  see  that  these 
statements  fit  in  with  our  theory  that  the  image  is  due  to  a 
conditioned  molecular  response  that  simulates  a  past  environ- 
ment at  one  time  in  communication  with  the  brain  centers 
responding. 

We  find  then  that  a  typical  memory  image  accompanies  a 
compound  sounder  response  and  is  due  to  the  operation  of 
tuning  process  mechanisms  and  association  mechanisms,  the 
latter  serving  to  coordinate  the  former. 

We  have  found  an  explanation  of  how  the  brain  can  simulate 
a  past  environment.  Let  us  pass  on  to  the  case  where  the 
image  corresponds  with  a  coming  environment.  Let  us  return 
to  our  illustration  of  the  man  on  the  river.  Suppose  he  sees 
in  the  distance  ahead  of  him  a  column  of  smoke  and  then  has 
a  mental  image  of  a  landing  pier  at  a  village  around  the  next 
bend.  At  first  thought  this  appears  to  be  an  image  of  a 
future  environment  but  on  second  thought  we  find  that  the 
man's  mental  image  is  the  result  of  his  previous  voyage  over 
the  same  route.  The  same  rule  will  apply  to  all  cases  where 
the  image  appears  to  anticipate  the  dbject.  The  mental 
picture  of  things  to  come  is  made  up  of  elements  derived  from 
past  experience.1  A  man  can  imagine  an  aggregate  that  he 
has  never  seen  but  it  will  be  made  up  of  familiar  units.  The 
power  of  combining  mental  images  is  acquired  by  degrees. 
It  must  be  largely  due  to  social  environment  and  to  language 
associations.  What  one  man  has  observed  another  man  can 
image  by  the  medium  of  language.  The  younger  are  taught 
analysis  and  synthesis  by  their  elders. 

It  is  evident  then  that  an  image  of  a  coming  environment 
is  due  to  the  same  nerve  mechanisms  that  serve  for  the  image 
of  a  past  environment.  All  mental  images  are  really  memory 
images  in  kind. 

1  Pillsbury,  op.  cit.,  p.  131. 


BRAIN  MECHANISMS  AND  MENTAL  IMAGES 

In  considering  these  brain  processes,  one  should  keep  it  in 
mind  that  the  power  to  form  an  image  diminishes  with  time. 
You  perhaps  have  a  clear  mental  image  of  a  particularly  fine 
cigar  that  was  given  you  yesterday,  but  had  it  been  a  week 
ago  you  probably  would  have  no  image  to  speak  of.  The 
longer  the  time,  the  less  is  the  conductivity  of  the  association 
nerve  paths  and  sooner  or  later  the  mechanisms  will  fail  to 
coordinate  so  as  to  simulate  the  past  environment. 

The  kinaesthetic  impulses  from  actual  and  incipient  mus- 
cular movements  have  much  to  do  with  provoking  sounder 
responses.  Acting,  talking  and  thinking  are  all  linked  together 
by  association  mechanisms.  Behavior  habits  and  language 
habits  serve  to  prevent  the  untimely  occurrence  of  sounder 
responses  as  a  rule.  It  is  not  always  true,  however,  as  a  man 
can  sometimes  be  reading  aloud  and  at  the  same  time,  have 
mental  images  having  no  connection  with  the  words  which  he 
is  subconsciously  repeating. 

When  a  man  is  awake  but  resting  quietly  in  an  unchanging 
environment,  he  is  usually  unconscious  of  his  environment  or, 
as  we  say,  he  is  lost  in  thought.  From  our  point  of  view  there 
are  no  mimetic  responses  in  his  brain  centers  and  his  nerve- 
muscle  system  is  occupied  with  a  series  of  incipient  muscular 
movements  accompanied  frequently  by  a  series  of  sounder 
responses  in  the  brain  centers.  There  is  a  constant  flow  back 
and  forth  of  efferent  and  afferent  (kinsesthetic)  impulses  which 
penetrate  one  cortical  center  after  another.  Those  centers 
that  have  been  tuned  by  past  experience  give  a  characteristic 
conditioned  molecular  response.  It  is  thus  that  mental  images 
transpire  more  commonly.  The  man  may  be  thinking  of 
future  events  but  it  is  always  in  terms  of  what  he  has  seen 
and  heard  before. 

Having  reached  these  conclusions  regarding  the  mental 
operations  of  a  man,  it  will  not  be  amiss  to  consider  briefly  the 
mental  processes  of  animals  lower  than  man.  Do  monkeys, 
dogs  and  other  intelligent  animals  have  mental  images?  We 
know  that  the  nervous  system  in  these  animals  is  much  the 
same  as  in  man  and  in  behavior  also  there  is  much  resemblance. 
The  brute  learns  by  experience  as  does  the  man.  In  man  we 


244  S.  BENT  RUSSELL 

find  great  superiority  in  expression  as  he  has  an  articulate 
language  which  the  brute  has  not.  There  is,  however,  com- 
munication with  the  brutes.  The  baying  of  a  beagle  on  the 
trail  of  a  rabbit,  no  doubt  has  in  its  changes  more  meaning  to 
the  other  beagles  than  even  to  the  experienced  hunter.  The 
available  evidence  indicates  that  the  nervous  mechanisms  in 
the  animal  are  of  the  same  kind  as  those  in  man.  Therefore 
it  is  probable  that  a  squirrel  has  a  mental  image  of  a  nut  that 
he  has  hidden  away  for  future  use,  the  same  as  a  man  would 
have,  and  that  a  fox  has  a  mental  image  of  the  bone  that  he 
buried  and  will  one  day  dig  up.  A  bird  probably  has  a  mental 
image  of  her  nest  that  she  built  herself  with  the  aid  of  her  mate 
just  as  a  man  has  of  a  hut  he  has  constructed.  In  the  man's 
brain  the  association  mechanisms  are  far  more  complex.  The 
number  of  association  nerve  paths  is  much  greater. 

In  conclusion  let  us  say  that  a  mental  image  can  only  occur 
when  there  is  a  coordinated  molecular  response  in  a  brain 
center  that  is  conditioned  by  a  former  environment.  The 
response  is  conditioned  by  means  of  registering  mechanisms 
in  the  center  and  of  association  mechanisms.  The  response 
is  the  same  in  kind  as  if  the  environment  in  question  were  still 
acting  upon  the  sense  organs  and  so  upon  the  center.  The 
man  is  not  conscious  of  an  image  as  such  but  of  the  environ- 
ment as  it  was.  He  sees  it  around  the  corner,  one  might  say. 
Usually,  of  course,  the  response  is  very  much  fainter  than  in 
the  case  of  direct  stimulus  from  the  sense  organ  in  perception. 

The  registering  mechanism  at  the  brain  center  when  in 
communication  with  the  environment,  acts  by  retransforming 
the  nervous  impulses  into  specific  molecular  changes  that  simu- 
late the  environmental  action  upon  the  sense  organ.  The 
result  is  a  permanent  set  of  the  molecules  that  is  a  factor  in 
subsequent  responses  to  excitation  by  any  nervous  impulses 
that  reach  the  center.  The  responses  in  the  registering  centers 
are  further  conditioned  and  also  coordinated  by  mechanisms  of 
association.  These  mechanisms  function  in  the  same  way  as 
they  do  in  the  case  of  conditioned  reflexes  which  cause  muscular 
movements.  The  same  sort  of  association  mechanisms  govern 
the  responses  in  the  registering  centers  as  govern  the  responses 
in  the  muscles  and  other  effectors. 


BRAIN  MECHANISMS  AND  MENTAL  IMAGES  245 

The  knowledge  that  a  highly  intelligent  man  has  of  the 
world  about  him  is  due  to  the  brain  mechanisms  that  have 
gradually  become  organized  and  developed  from  his  birth  up. 
This  applies  also,  of  course,  to  a  man's  knowledge  of  himself. 

Finally  we  cannot  escape  the  conclusion  that  in  a  man's 
consciousness  of  past  and  future,  brain  mechanisms  are  an 
essential  factor.  Without  brain  mechanisms  a  man  would 
have  no  more  mental  power  and  no  more  consciousness  than 
an  apple  tree. 


VOL.  27,  No.  4  July,  1920 


THE  PSYCHOLOGICAL  REVIEW 


THE    MODIFICATION    OF    INSTINCT    FROM   THE 
STANDPOINT  OF  SOCIAL  PSYCHOLOGY 

BY  WALTER  S.  HUNTER 
The  University  of  Kansas 

In  the  discussion  which  follows  I  have  attempted  a  rela- 
tively comprehensive  statement  of  the  modification  of  instinct 
with  particular  reference  to  the  topic  as  incorporated  in 
social  psychology.  The  formulations  have  been  made  with 
reference  to  a  statement  of  general  principles  rather  than  with 
a  view  to  a  summary  of  such  experimental  data  as  might  be. 
available.  I  think  most  social  psychologists  approach  the; 
topic  of  instinct  with  the  feeling  that  while  it  should  be  of 
great  importance,  from  an  a  priori  standpoint,  yet  that  the 
actual  developments  which  the  topic  receives  fail  somehow 
to  justify  the  expectation.  Social  psychology  is,  of  course, 
as  interested  in  the  experimental  facts  concerning  instinct 
as  is  normal  human  adult  psychology,  but  it  seeks  more 
insistently  to  put  the  data  together  in  a  manner  significant 
for  the  understanding  of  human  nature  so  far  as  this  is  modi- 
fied by  its  social  environs. 

In  section  I.,  I  have  sought  merely  a  reformulation  (pos- 
sibly more  detailed  than  usual)  of  the  modification  of  instinct 
on  its  afferent  or  efferent  sides,  or  on  both  simultaneously. 
This  section  is  preparatory  for  those  that  follow.  In  sections 
II.  and  III.,  types  of  instinctive  modification  are  considered 
which  are  new  to  social  psychology  and  all  but  unsuggested 
in  the  other  fields  of  general  psychology.  These  sections 
discuss  (l)  the  fact  and  significance  of  the  temporal  position 
of  the  modifications  as  occurring  before  or  after  the  first 

247 


248  WALTER  S.  HUNTER 

instinctive    performance,    and    (2)    the   modification   of   the 
biological  purposes  of  inherited  responses. 

I.  MODIFICATIONS  OF  THE   SENSORY  AND  MOTOR  ASPECTS 

OF  INSTINCT 

Previous  writers  have  attacked  the  question  of  the 
modification  of  instinct  at  three  chief  points:  (a)  indicating 
that  an  increase  in  perfection  of  response  through  practice 
does  take  place;  (b)  disentangling  (partly)  the  separate  roles 
of  maturation  and  use  in  the  increasing  perfection;  and  (c) 
pointing  out  that  modifications  concern  either  the  stimulus 
or  the  response  side  of  the  instinct.  It  is  this  latter  point  that 
we  wish  to  formulate  in  the  present  section. 

Shortly  after  birth  an  individual  will,  through  heredity, 
manifest  the  fear  reaction  upon  the  presentation  of  certain 
stimuli.  By  virtue  of  associations,  these  stimuli  may  later 
become  ineffective  and  new  stimuli  be  secured  which  were 
previously  indifferent.  Thus  birds  on  desert  islands  show 
no  fear  of  man  until  the  frequency  of  his  appearance,  coupled 
with  effective  stimuli  for  fear,  finally  endows  the  perception 
of  man  himself  with  the  capacity  to  arouse  fear.  Studies  of 
the  conditioned  reflex  are  laboratory  observations  of  this 
same  phenomenon.  The  protective  reflex  of  the  finger, 
e.g.,  has  as  its  unconditioned  (inherited)  stimulus  injury  to 
the  finger;  but  by  a  frequent  simultaneous  presentation  of 
sound  and  injury,  sound  also  becomes  an  effective  stimulus 
producing  withdrawal  of  the  finger.  The  internal  mechanism 
of  this  need  not  concern  us  in  the  present  discussion.  It 
should  be  stated,  however,  that  habits  as  well  as  inherited 
forms  of  response  are  susceptible  to  this  type  of  modification, 
the  distinction  being  that  we  deal  with  conditioned  reflexes 
directly  when  the  changes  effected  are  made  from  the  original 
stimulus  rather  than  from  stimuli  which  in  themselves  may 
be  one  or  more  removes  from  the  hereditary  status  of  the 
response. 

From  the  side  of  changes  in  effector  activities  proper, 
the  same  statements  are  true  although  the  term  conditioned 
reflex  seems  not  to  have  attached  to  such  modifications, 


MODIFICATION  OF  INSTINCT  *49 

undoubtedly  due  to  the  accident  governing  the  choice  of 
laboratory  procedure.  The  protective  reflex  and  the  salivary 
reflex,  i.t.t  the  effector  activities  proper,  have  been  kept 
constant  in  such  studies  and  experimentation  directed  toward 
the  analysis  of  stimulus  changes.  However  the  physiological 
changes  effected  are  presumably  no  different  from  those 
which  occur  in  the  contrary  case  when  experience  changes 
the  type  of  response  while  the  stimulus  remains  constant. 
The  illustrations  of  this  are  legion.  One  may  cite  the  changes 
which  occur  in  the  "expression"  of  fear  and  anger  as  the 
human  individual  matures  in  a  social  environment,  or  one 
may  consider  the  modifications  which  occur  in  animal  be- 
havior during  the  process  of  learning.  In  the  latter  case,  a 
total  situation  is  presented  to  a  white  rat  placed  in  a  visual 
discrimination  box,  calling  forth  exploratory  movements; 
but  under  the  influence  of  punishment,  reward,  and  frequency, 
the  exploratory  movements  are  inhibited  and  give  way  to 
well-defined  food  responses.  One  may  state  such  an  outcome 
either  as  the  inhibition  of  an  instinctive  response  to  a  given 
stimulus  by  acquired  responses,  or  as  the  acquisition  by  the 
food-getting  response  of  a  new  stimulus.  Perhaps  both 
are  involved. 

The  social  values  of  the  above  types  of  change  in  instinct 
have  been  so  widely  recognized  that  we  need  not  elaborate 
the  problem  further.  This  is  not  true,  however,  in  the  case 
of  those  modifications  termed  sublimations.  The  sublimation 
of  instinct  in  the  human  individual  is  an  example  of  the 
simultaneous  modification  of  the  afferent  and  efferent  phases 
of  the  response.  Anger  becomes  righteous  indignation  by 
the  substitution  of  a  new  and  (in  this  case)  an  ideal  stimulus 
for  the  sensory  (animal)  one  and  by  the  conversion  of  the 
gross  bodily  attack  into  the  response  of  denunciation,  pur- 
chasing Liberty  Bonds,  or  longer  hours  of  labor.  Sex  im- 
pulses may  be  sublimated  in  artistic  activity,  in  dancing,  in 
religious  activity,  or,  when  joined  possibly  with  the  parental 
impulse,  in  social  service.  Instances  of  sublimation  are 
those  where  the  inherited  impulses  are  placed  at  the  service 
of  activities  which  bear  little  or  no  resemblance  to  the  activity 


250  WALTER  S.  HUNTER 

which  normally  embodies  the  impulse.  The  cases  are  not 
due  to  the  suppression  or  elimination  of  the  instinct  in  its 
entirety;  only  the  somatic,  skeletal  responses  are  inhibited 
while  the  visceral  continue  probably  at  full  intensity.  The 
individual  may  entirely  fail,  and  usually  does  fail,  to  identify 
the  persistent  behavior  complex,  because  to  the  uninitiated, 
instincts  are  identified  in  terms  of  their  somatic  components. 
It  is  this  difficulty  of  identification  which  permits  the  sublimation 
to  proceed  unimpeded  by  emotional  conflict,  and  unthreatened 
by  the  failure  which  would  almost  surely  be  its  lot  did  the  subject 
realize  the  origin  of  his  impulses  in  their  proper  (unconditioned} 
instinct. 

Although  the  non-technical  use  of  sublimate  means  to 
purify,  or  to  idealize,  the  preceding  analysis  would  indicate 
that  the  physiological  mechanisms  involved  need  not  include 
the  equivalent  of  ideals.  The  stimuli  for  artistic  activities, 
for  dancing,  for  charity  and  social  service  may  be  as  concrete 
as  for  the  arousal  of  any  other  form  of  modified  instinctive 
performance.  The  presence  of  syncopated  music  and  mem- 
bers of  the  opposite  sex  initiates  dancing,  and  the  awareness 
of  suffering  and  poverty  calls  out  charitable  relief  in  those 
individuals  possessing  the  sublimated  behavior.  And  so, 
although  one  would  hesitate  to  apply  this  term  to  animals 
below  man,  the  understanding  of  instinctive  modifications 
is  better  when  one  realizes  the  essential  continuity  of  the 
phenomena.  Thus  a  dog  can  by  training  be  made  angry  by 
whistling,  and  the  instinct  can  then  be  modified  on  its  effector 
side  by  training  the  dog  to  vent  his  pugnacity  in  some  unusual 
manner.  Behavioristically,  the  instinct  is  as  trully  subli- 
mated as  in  man,  although  the  social  significance  of  the 
change  may  be  infinitesimal. 

It  is  proper  that  we  should  place  beside  the  above  state- 
ments the  following  remarks  by  Woodworth1: 

"Freud's  'sublimation'  is  an  attractive  concept.  It  is 
'nice'  to  believe  that  crude  motives,  that  cannot  be  allowed 
their  natural  outlet,  can  be  drained  off  into  other  activities, 
so  that  a  libidinous  infatuation,  sluiced  out  of  its  natural 

1  Woodworth,  R.  S.,  'Dynamic  Psychology.'    New  York:  1918,  p.  175-6. 


MODIFICATION  OF  INSTINCT  ^S1 

channel,  can  be  made  to  drive  the  wheels  of  an  artistic  or 
humanitarian  hobby.  But  there  is  no  clear  evidence  that  this 
can  be  accomplished.  What  does  happen  sometimes  is  that, 
in  the  effort  to  escape  from,  and  distract  oneself  from  a 
strong  but  unwelcome  impulse,  one  turns  to  some  other 
activity  capable  of  enlisting  interest;  and,  since  the  unwelcome 
impulse  is  not  easily  resisted,  one  has  to  become  as  absorbed 
as  possible  in  this  other  activity.  Under  such  conditions, 
interest  in  this  other  activity  may  grow  into  a  strong  motive 
force  and  effectually  supplant  the  unwelcome  impulse. 
But  this  is  distinctly  not  making  the  unwelcome  impulse  do 
work  foreign  to  its  own  tendency.  This  impulse  is  not  drawn 
into  service,  it  is  resisted.  If  there  were  no  other  and  con- 
trary motive  force,  the  impulse  in  question  would  have  its 
own  way.  We  did  see  that  the  tendency  towards  a  'con- 
summatory  reaction'  acted  as  the  drive  to  other  mechanisms, 
but  these  were  mechanisms  that  subserved  the  main  tendency, 
whereas  'sublimation'  would  mean  that  the  tendency  toward 
a  certain  consummation  could  be  made  to  drive  mechanisms 
irrelevant  or  even  contrary  to  itself.  There  seems  to  be  really 
no  evidence  for  this,  and  it  probably  is  to  be  regarded  as  a 
distinctly  wrong  reading  of  the  facts  of  motivation." 

We  must  agree  with  Woodworth  that  compelling  evidence 
of  sublimation  is  difficult  to  secure.  We  do  believe  however 
that  the  psycho-analysts  have  made  a  good  case  for  its 
existence;  and  when  we  remember  the  introspective  difficulties 
besetting  the  identification  of  visceral  components  of  response 
and  of  minor  somatic  responses  in  general,  we  are  tempted  to 
conclude  that  the  case  will  always  lack  that  clear-cut  evidence 
which  is  desirable.  However,  the  James-Lange  theory  of 
emotion  meets  the  same  type  of  difficulty  and  yet  has  managed 
to  survive  its  severest  critics  because  of  the  intrinsic  merit  of 
its  claims.  We  shall  indicate  schematically  in  a  following 
paragraph  how  the  neural  processes  may  proceed  in  sublima- 
tion; but  here,  in  the  light  of  Woodworth's  remarks,  renewed 
emphasis  should  be  placed  upon  points  already  stressed. 

i.  Sublimations  do  not  arise  suddenly  in  an  effort  to 
control  an  unruly  impulse  that  is  recognized  as  undesirable; 


252  WALTER  S.  HUNTER 

they  are  the  end-products  of  modifications  whose  formation 
has  probably  extended  over  several  years.  The  behavior 
which  may  be  said  to  undergo  this  modification  may  indeed 
never  make  its  actual  appearance,  due  to  the  fact — which  we 
shall  emphasize  later  in  the  paper — that  certain  habits  or 
customs  have  been  fixed  upon  the  individual  before  the 
normal  time  for  the  instinct  to  appear.  Therefore  when 
the  instinct  manifests  itself,  it  does  so  from  the  very  beginning 
in  modified  form. 

2.  The  visceral  responses  which  constitute  the  physical 
basis  of  the  impulse  and  emotion  of  the  sublimated  behavior 
can  be  identified  by  skilled  introspection  as  closely  similar  to 
the  visceral  core  (or  "feel")  of  the  unsublimated  form  of  the 
response.     Indeed  this  is  a  chief  reason  for  insisting  that  such 
behavior  as  righteous  indignation,  e.g.,  is  a  refined  and  derived 
form  of  animal  anger.     Or  again,  the  alleged  similarity  of 
the  emotional  quales  is  a  prominent  reason  for  the  insistent 
attempts  to  identify  the  sex  and  religious  activities. 

3.  One  need  not  assume,  as  Woodworth  does,  that  in 
sublimated  forms  of  behavior  the  "drive"  does  only  work 
foreign  to  its  natural  purpose.     On  the  contrary,  an  intro- 
spective description  of  the  cases  would  suggest  that,  did  we 
have  adequate  recording  methods,  widespread  visceral  and 
somatic  responses  would  be  found  present  at  low  intensity  in 
contrast  to  the  high  intensity  marking  the  untransformed 
behavior.     What  is  important  is  that  the  behavior  initiated 
by  the  sublimated  impulse  shall  not  impress  the  observer  as  a 
surviving    (or    anticipating)    part   of    the    original    instinct. 
The  uninitiated  subject  may  only  feel  the  restlessness  due  to 
visceral  change.s  without  recognizing  in  any  degree  the  total 
response  to  which  this  restlessness  normally  belongs.     He  may 
therefore  proceed  to  make  use  of  this  impulsive  tendency  in 
some  socially  acceptable  behavior,   the  frequent  repetition 
of  which  may  constitute  his  idiosyncracy  or  even  his  profes- 
sion.    We  shall  see  later  that  many  instinctive  impulses  may 
be  made  to  work  out  purposes  other  than  those  for  which 
the  instinct  was  apparently  designed.     In  sublimation  the 
situation  is  the  same,  a  behavior  component  becomes  trans- 


MODIFICATION  OF  INSTINCT  *53 

ferred  from  one  total  response  to  another  through  the  so-called 
conditioned  reflex  type  of  association  and  so  does  duty  in  the 
service  of  a  purpose  not  originally  its  own. 

A  formulation  in  terms  of  the  neural  diagram  of  Fig.  I 
may  help  give  definiteness  to  the  preceding  account.     In- 


B, 


FIG.  i.  Schematic  representation  of  the  neural  elements  involved  in  the  modifi- 
cation of  instinct.  NS,  the  central  nervous  system.  Si,  the  original  stimulus;  St,  an 
acquired  stimulus;  Rt,  the  original  somatic  response;  Rt,  a  new  or  modified  somatic 
response;  X,  the  visceral  sensory  component  of  the  stimulus;  and  IR,  the  internal,  or 
visceral,  response.  The  mutual  relations  of  these  elements  are  discussed  in  the  body 
of  the  paper. 

stincts  belong  to  either  of  two  classes:  those  having  a  con- 
spicuous visceral  component  in  the  stimulus  and  those  that 
do  not.  This  visceral  component  corresponds  on  the  phy- 
siological side  to  the  appetite  or  desire  prominent  in  food- 
getting  and  sex,  e.g.,  relatively  absent  in  fear  and  anger,  and 
totally  absent  in  the  simpler  instincts  (reflexes)  of  walking, 
standing,  grasping,  and  even  in  such  responses  as  collecting, 
curiosity,  and  others.  This  visceral  component  is  repre- 
sented in  the  figure  by  X.  Normally  the  instinctive  behavior 
RI  is  produced  by  the  unconditioned  stimulus  Si  acting  alone 
or  in  conjunction  with  internal  stimulus  X.  In  many  cases 
these  afferent  conditions  also  produce  visceral  effects,  IR. 
Modifications  of  this  original  inherited  equipment,  so  far  as 
the  elements  of  the  neuro-physiological  mechanisms  are 
concerned,  may  be  thought  of  in  any  one  of  the  following 
ways,  or  in  combinations  of  these:  (i)  St  acting  alone  or  in 
conjunction  with  X  may  by  use  become  an  effective  stimulus 
for  the  responses  RI  (somatic)  and  IR  (visceral).  The 


254  WALTER  S.  HUNTER 

organism  now  fears  some  new  object,  has  adopted  some  new 
article  of  diet,  or  (as  is  beautifully  illustrated  for  animals 
below  man  in  Craig's  work  with  pigeons)  has  acquired  some 
new  sexual  object.  The  internal  appetite  is  still  present,  the 
responses  of  the  skeletal  muscles  are  unmodified,  the  visceral 
effects  underlying  the  consciousness  termed  emotion  are  in 
full  vigor,  only  the  external  stimulus  has  changed,  although 
it  may  have  changed  to  something  which  no  longer  suggests 
Si  to  the  experiencing  subject.  (2)  Si,  in  the  cases  where 
by  heredity  the  cooperation  of  X  is  necessary  to  give  the 
afferent  activity  control  of  the  final  common  path  to  R\  and 
IR,  may  by  use  secure  the  power  to  arouse  R\  when  X  is 
absent.  Here  belong  the  cases  where  an  instinct  is  aroused 
in  the  absence  of  the  normal  appetite  or  desire,  jaded  instincts, 
in  a  word.  (3)  Modification  2  may  occur  after  S2  has  become 
the  effective  stimulus.  (4)  By  use,  or  through  the  absence  of 
the  proper  S,  X  may  become  so  vigorous,  so  intense,  so  volumi- 
nous, that  in  the  absence  of  an  effective  S,  or  even  of  any 
discoverable  S,  it  may  secure  possession  of  the  final  common 
path  to  RI  and  IR.  As  examples  we  may  cite:  Breed's 
chicks,  when  they  gave  the  drinking  reaction  in  the  air  with 
no  observable  outside  stimulus  present;  the  case  of  a  starving 
man  or  one  perishing  with  thirst  who  swallows  totally  inade- 
quate and  normally  non-effective  stimuli;  unreasoning, 
groundless  fears;  and  finally  cases  of  gluttony,  alcoholism, 
and  abnormal  sex  hunger.  (5)  Si  or  S2  may  by  practice 
secure  the  power  to  arouse  R\  not  only  in  the  absence  of  X 
but  without  involving  any  noticeable  visceral  changes,  IR. 
This  is  the  instinctive  behavior  devoid  not  only  of  normal 
appetite  but  of  the  normal  emotional  satisfaction  which 
accompanies  its  exercise.  Again  the  most  striking  illustra- 
tions come  from  the  field  of  food  and  sex  responses.  (6)  The 
modification  of  the  instinct  may  proceed  with  Si  and  X 
unchanged  but  with  the  response  shifted  from  R\  to  R2, — 
or  from  a  clumsy  and  unskilled  RI  to  an  efficient  performance 
of  the  same  response  (as,  e.g.,  in  Breed's  experiments). 
Again  it  should  be  noted  that  R2  may  be  so  different  from 
RI  that  an  observer  not  knowing  the  genetic  facts  would  be 


MODIFICATION  OF  INSTINCT  255 

unable  to  detect  a  relationship  between  the  two  activities. 
(7)  The  final  case  of  modification  occurs  when  the  effects  of 
practice,  or  use,  have  substituted  S2 — jRj  for  the  original 
behavior  with  or  without  abnormality  in  X  and  IR.  These 
are  the  typical  cases  of  sublimation;  and,  if  X  and  IR  are 
unmodified,  they  are  the  cases  where  the  desires  and  emotions 
(satisfactions)  of  one  original  response  are  put  at  the  service 
of,  or  incorporated  into,  derived  forms  of  behavior.  Stated 
in  this  manner  and  placed  in  relation  to  other  forms  of  sti- 
mulus and  response  changes,  sublimation  loses  any  mystical 
character  it  may  have  been  thought  to  include  and  stands 
forth  as  a  peculiarly  important  type  of  the  modification  of 
instinct. 

II.  THE  TEMPORAL  POSITION  OF  THE  MODIFICATIONS 

So  far  our  analysis  has  concerned  those  phases  of  instinc- 
tive modification  which  can  be  formulated  in  terms  of  change 
in  the  elements  of  the  stimulus-response  situation.  Two 
other  problems  now  remain  to  be  emphasized,  problems  which 
although  of  fundamental  importance  in  the  modification  and 
control  of  behavior  are  unnoticed  in  the  social  psychologies, 
and  are  at  the  best  treated  only  by  implication  by  the  tech- 
nical students  of  instinct.  These  problems  are:  (i)  The 
temporal  position  of  the  modification,  whether  coming  prior 
or  subsequent  to  the  first  instinctive  performance;  and  (2) 
modifications  of  the  biological  purpose,  or  end,  involved 
in  the  inherited  behavior. 

The  modifications  of  instinctive  performance  are  not  all 
variations  (of  the  stimulus,  of  the  somatic  response,  or  of 
the  visceral  response)  produced  after  the  instinct  first  appears. 
Instances  which  do  belong  here  we  have  already  illustrated. 
Other  modifications  occur  because  of  influences  at  work  before 
the  instinct  makes  its  initial  appearance.  These  changes 
will  clearly  affect  the  instincts  in  proportion  to  the  length  of 
the  interval  between  birth  and  the  instinct's  appearance 
and  in  proportion  to  the  social  value  inherent  in  a  modification 
of  the  instinct  in  question.  The  dates  and  order  of  the 
appearance  of  the  various  instincts  are  sufficiently  known 


*56 


WALTER  S.  HUNTER 


to  serve  our  present  general  purpose.  Figure  2  indicates  for 
man  the  early  appearance  of  the  responses  of  feeding,  fear, 
anger,  and  vocalization,  the  final  appearance  of  the  sex  and 
parental  responses,  and  the  intermediate  appearance  of  such 
responses  as  play,  acquisition,  locomotion,  construction,  etc. 
We  do  not  mean  to  imply  by  the  use  of  this  diagram  any  more 


FIG.  2.  Diagram  indicating:  the  early  appearance  of  the  instincts  of  feeding, 
fear,  anger,  and  vocalization;  the  intermediate  appearance  of  such  instinctive  responses 
as  play,  acquisition,  locomotion,  etc.;  and  the  late  appearance  of  sex  and  parental 
behavior.  The  curves  for  each  instinct  suggest  the  appearance  of  component  elements 
before  the  complete  instinct  matures  and  is  active.  No  emphasis  is  to  be  placed  either 
upon  the  relative  order  of  the  intermediate  instincts  or  upon  the  form  and  length  of 
the  several  curves. 

than  concerns  our  immediate  purpose.  The  instincts  and 
instinctive  tendencies  in  man  are  as  a  rule  too  indefinite  in 
their  manifestations  to  enable  a  very  satisfactory  listing, 
and  the  question  of  their  temporal  order  of  appearance  is  one 
calling  for  much  additional  experimental  work.  Particularly 
is  it  important  for  the  problem  of  the  modification  of  instinct 
that  the  early  traces  be  noted  of  instincts  which  appear  late. 
Our  very  simple  diagram  (Fig.  2)  enables  us  to  visualize 
clearly  the  possibility  of  the  temporal  aspects  of  the  modifica- 
tions above  mentioned.  It  also  serves  to  suggest  that  the 
instincts  which  will  be  most  open  to  change  by  virtue  of 
preexperience  will  be  the  ones  listed  farthest  to  the  right. 
Feeding,  fear,  and  anger,  e.g.,  appearing  as  they  do  practically 
at  birth,  offer  no  other  possibility  than  modifications  sub- 
sequent to  their  appearance;  while  the  temporal  interval 
antedating  sex,  e.g.,  makes  possible  the  acquisition  of  many 


MODIFICATION  OF  INSTINCT  *S7 

responses  which  will  serve  to  modify  (and  control)  that 
instinct.1 

Although  our  chief  interest  does  not  lie  in  the  historical 
aspects  of  our  subject,  it  will  be  worth  while  to  indicate  the 
types  of  comment  and  experiment  already  available  in  the 
literature  so  far  as  they  may  concern  the  modification  of 
instinct  by  preexperience.  We  derive  the  first  suggestion 
from  the  writings  of  Karl  Groos  on  play  (1895)  where  the 
following  statements  occur:2 

"...  there  can  be  no  doubt  that  instinct  plays  a  part 
in  all  this  adaptation  for  the  struggle  for  life  and  preservation 
of  the  species,  so  necessary  in  man  and  other  animals.  Further 
...  it  would  be  entirely  in  harmony  with  other  phenomena 
of  heredity  if  we  found  that  these  instincts  appear  at  that 
period  of  life  when  they  are  first  seriously  needed.  Just  as 
many  physical  peculiarities  which  are  of  use  in  the  struggle 
for  the  female  only  develop  when  the  animal  needs  them; 
just  as  many  instincts  that  belong  to  reproduction  first 
appear  at  maturity;  so  the  instinct  of  hostility  might  first 
spring  up  in  the  same  manner  only  when  there  is  real  need 
for  it;  and  so  it  might  be  supposed  with  other  instincts  in 
connection  with  related  activities.  The  instinct  for  flight 
would  only  be  awakened  by  real  danger,  and  that  of  hunting 
only  when  the  animal's  parents  no  longer  nourished  it,  and 
so  on.  In  this  case  it  would  be  necessary  for  the  special 
instincts  to  be  elaborated  to  their  last  and  finest  details. 
For  if  they  were  only  imperfectly  prepared,  and  therefore 
insufficient  for  the  real  end,  the  animal  might  as  well  enter 
on  his  struggle  for  life  totally  unprepared.  .  .  . 

"Without  play  practice  it  would  be  absolutely  indispen- 
sible  that  instinct  should  be  very  completely  developed,  in 
order  that  the  acts  described  might  be  accurately  performed 

1  In  what  follows  we  shall  have  much  to  say  concerning  sex  behavior,  but  this 
must  in  no  way  be  interpreted  as  an  adoption  of  the  Freudian  point  of  view  that  sex  is 
the  dominant  instinct.    Our  emphasis  upon  this  response  results  because  (a)  of  the 
strength  of  its  impulse,  (b)  of  the  lateness  of  its  appearance,  and  (c)  of  the  fact  that  it 
assumes  a  more  definite  instinctive  form  than  other  late  instincts. 

2  Groos,  Karl,  'The  Play  of  Animals.'     Eng.  trans,  by  Baldwin.    New  York: 
1898,  pp.  73-4;  79. 


»58  WALTER  S.  HUNTER 

by  inherited  mechanism,  as  is  also  the  case  with  such  in- 
stinctive acts  as  are  exhibited  but  once  in  a  life  time." 

"...  instincts  are  not  so  perfectly  developed,  not  so 
stamped  in  all  their  details  on  the  brain,  as  they  would  have 
to  be  if  their  first  expressions  were  to  be  serious  acts.  There- 
fore they  appear  in  youth,  and  must  be  perfected  during  that 
period  by  constant  practice." 

One  need  not  accept  Groos's  theory  of  play  in  order  to 
admit  the  essentials  of  the  above  quotations.  There  is  a 
playful  exercise  of  those  elements  of  an  instinct  which  appear 
prior  to  the  complete  appearance  of  the  inherited  behavior, 
and  this  exercise  does,  by  the  law  of  habit,  have  an  effect 
upon  subsequent  arousals. 

Lloyd  Morgan,  writing  in  1900,  speaks  much  more 
definitely  on  our  present  problem:1 

"Even  in  the  case  of  the  very  first  exhibition  of  such  a 
deferred  instinct  as  the  moor-hen's  dive,  although  that  or- 
ganized sequence  of  acts  which  constituted  the  behavior  as  a 
whole  had  never  before  occurred,  although  there  was  no 
gradual  learning  how  to  dip  beneath  the  surface,  and  to  swim 
under  water,  still  many  of  the  constituent  acts  had  been  often 
repeated;  experience  had  already  been  gained  of  much  of 
the  detail  then  for  the  first  time  combined  in  an  instinctive 
sequence.  So  that  if  we  distinguish  between  instinct  as 
congenital  and  habit  as  acquired,  we  must  not  lose  sight  of 
the  fact  that  there  is  continual  interaction,  in  a  great  number 
of  cases,  between  instinct  and  habit,  and  that  the  first  per- 
formance of  a  deferred  instinct  may  be  carried  out  in  close 
and  inextricable  association  with  the  habits  which,  at  the 
period  of  life  in. question,  have  already  been  acquired." 

This  point  of  view  Morgan  continues  to  discuss  down  to 
191 2,2  without,  however,  so  far  as  I  am  aware,  commenting 
upon  its  social  significance  or  attempting  any  general  analysis 
of  the  problem.  I  can  find  no  discussion  of  this  temporal 
aspect  of  the  modification  in  the  current  textbooks  of  psy- 

1  Morgan,  C.  Lloyd,  'Animal  Behavior.'    London:  1900,  p.  106. 

8  Morgan,  C.  Lloyd,  'Instinct  and  Experience.'    New  York:  1912,  chs.  I  and  2. 


MODIFICATION  OF  INSTINCT  «59 

chology,  nor  in  the  social  psychologies1  and  more  special 
treatises  on  instinct  and  behavior.  Undoubtedly  in  the 
observational  literature  on  instincts  many  instances  could  be 
unearthed.  We  shall  cite  but  one,  perhaps  the  best  one, 
however,  and  then  proceed  with  our  comments  on  the  general 
problem. 

This  illustration  is  drawn  from  the  work  of  C.  O.  Whitman 
on  pigeons,  and  is  as  follows:2 

"If  a  bird  of  one  species  is  hatched  and  reared  by  a  wholly 
different  species,  it  is  very  apt  when  fully  grown  to  prefer  to 
mate  with  the  species  under  which  it  has  been  reared.  For 
example,  a  male  passenger-pigeon  that  was  reared  with  ring- 
doves and  had  remained  with  that  species  was  ever  ready, 
when  fully  grown,  to  mate  with  any  ring-dove,  but  could 
never  be  induced  to  mate  with  one  of  his  own  species.  I  kept 
him  away  from  ring-doves  a  whole  season,  in  order  to  see 
what  could  be  accomplished  in  the  way  of  getting  him  mated 
finally  with  his  own  species,  but  he  would  never  make  any 
advances  to  the  females,  and  whenever  a  ring-dove  was  seen 
or  heard  in  the  yard  he  was  at  once  attentive." 

("It  may  be  remarked  by  the  editor  that  the  discovery  of 
this    principle    furnishes    the    key    to    Professor    Whitman's 
success  in  hybridizing  the  various  species  of  pigeons.     A  novel 
and  important  principle  of  behavior  is  here  involved.     The 
range  of  stimuli  to  which  an  instinctive  tendency  will  respond  j 
may  be  modified   by  habits   acquired   long  before  the  first  * 
expression*  of  the  instinct.     The  first  expression  of  a  delayed 
instinctive  tendency  may  thus  be  in  part  a  function  of  all 
that  the  organism  has  previously  acquired.") 

While  we  cannot  agree  with  Carr  that  the  principle  of 
behavior  involved  in  Whitman's  work  is  novel,  yet  we  must 
agree  that  it  is  important  far  beyond  any  recognition  yet 

1  Baldwin  skirts  the  edge  of  the  problem  in  his  account  of  social  heredity  as  de- 
veloped in  "Social  and  Ethical  Interpretations,"  New  York:  1906,  4th  edition,  Pt.  I, 
ch.  2;  but  he  seems  not  to  have  stated  explicitly  that  social  heredity  may  get  in  its 
work  on  the  individual  before  the  instinct  (physical  heredity)  has  appeared  in  that 
individual. 

*  Whitman,  C.  O.,  'Orthogenetic  Evolution  in  Pigeons,'  Vol.  3,  'The  Behavior  of 
Pigeons.'  Edited  by  Harvey  Carr.  Carneg.  Inst.  Washington,  Publ.  No.  257,  1919, 
p.  28.  I  have  added  Carr's  editorial  comments  in  parenthesis. 


«6o  WALTER  S.  HUNTER 

given  it.  This  modification  of  instinctive  behavior  by  expe- 
rience encountered  prior  to  the  first  appearance  of  the  in- 
herited response  may  be  conceived  in  any  of  the  following 
ways:  (i)  The  early  appearance  of  component  elements  of 
the  final  total  behavior  (as  indicated  by  the  curves  of  Fig.  2) 
may  involve  their  own  modificaton  on  the  basis  of  use  in 
such  a  manner  that  when  the  total  instinctive  response  ap- 
pears it  does  so  in  a  manner  not  entirely  determined  by 
heredity.  This  modification  may  be  either  on  the  stimulus  or 
on  the  motor  side  of  the  early  appearing  tendencies,  and  is  in 
this  respect  a  case  under  section  I.  of  this  paper.  This  would 
be  the  type  of  case  covered  by  Groos's  theory  of  play  and  by 
Morgan's  description  above  quoted.  (2)  Perhaps  indepen- 
dently of  any  early  component  tendencies  of  later  instincts, 
the  individual  may  be  instructed  in  the  nature  of  the  socially 
accepted  stimuli  and  forms  of  response  so  that  when  occasion 
arises  he  will  respond  in  the  socially  accepted  manner.1 
So  thorough  and  far  reaching  may  these  modifications  be, 
that  the  individual  may  never  know  the  animal  form  of  the 
instinct;  and  yet  we  must  believe  that  this  persists,  in  the 
form  perhaps  of  synaptic  connections,  because  something 
very  like  it  appears  when  the  bonds  of  social  restraint  are 
relaxed.2 

The  responses  of  feeding,  fear,  and  anger,  as  we  have 
said,  appear  too  early  in  the  individual's  life  for  this  general 
type  of  modification;  but  such  responses  as  play,  constructive- 
ness,  sex,  display,  and  the  parental  instinct,  occurring  later, 
offer  the  individual  and  the  social  group  an  opportunity  to 
determine  prior  to  the  onset  of  the  behavior  the  stimuli  which 

1  This  instruction  which  precedes  the  maturing  of  relevant  interests  is  undoubtedly 
very  uneconomical  from  the  standpoint  of  the  laws  of  learning;  but  the  vital  problem 
is  not  the  speed  and  efficiency  of  the  acquisition,  it  is  rather  the  mere  fact  of  acquisition, 
the  importance  of  building  up  controls  while  the  organism  is  yet  young. 

2  It  seems  hardly  believable,  in  view  of  this  last  fact,  that  any  psychologist  should 
deny  that  man  possesses  true  instincts.     Present-day  society  has  so  modified  the 
individual  and  his  environment,  that  the  individual  seldom  experiences  the  sheer  animal 
form  of  the  response — indeed  some  may  never  do  so.    However,  occasionally  in 
moments  of  great  stress,  the  individual  is  literally  swept  off  his  feet  by  a  gust  of  animal- 
like  passion.     Perhaps  once  or  twice  I  have  approached  such  an  experience.     My  own 
testimony  would  be  that  in  such  a  case  one  is  for  the  moment  an  all  but  unconscious 
automaton. 


MODIFICATION  OF  INSTINCT  «6i 

shall  ordinarily  arouse  it  and  the  form  which  it  shall  take. 
Play  activities  vary  in  their  content  in  dependence  upon  the 
social  environment,  as  do  constructiveness  and  sex  also. 
Long  prior  to  the  maturing  of  the  latter  instinct  and  even 
longer  before  its  usual  manifestation,  society  has  set  before 
the  individual  a  pattern  which,  like  the  Great  Stone  Face  of 
Hawthorne's  tale,  shall  serve  more  or  less  unconsciously  to 
instruct  and  guide  him  in  the  accepted  stimuli  and  responses 
of  that  behavior.  Religious  training  likewise  can,  and  does 
in  many  cases,  take  the  young  individual  and  so  shape  his 
religious  symbols  and  responses  that  when  religious  activities 
do  appear  definitely  in  adolescence,  it  shall  seem  but  natural 
to  turn  to  one  sect  or  one  religion  for  their  gratification. 
Society  in  this  type  of  modification  is  giving  the  individual 
the  benefit  of  its  own  experience,  not  by  permitting  the 
instinct  to  manifest  itself  in  the  crude  animal  form  and  then 
modifying  it,  but  by  building  up  the  proper  controls  prior 
to  the  emergency. 

III.  MODIFICATIONS  OF  THE  BIOLOGICAL  PURPOSE 
The  final  problem  which  we  have  set  ourselves  is  now  at 
hand.  Modifications  of  the  instincts  are  not  only  of  the 
sorts  which  have  been  outlined  above,  but  they  may  involve 
essential  changes  in  the  biological  purpose  of  the  response. 
By  the  biological  purpose  of  an  instinct,  I  mean  the  adaptive  ^ 
purpose  which  it  secures  or  tends  to  secure.  Thus  the 
biological  end  in  view  in  the  case  of  fear  is  the  removal  of  the 
organism  from  the  dangerous  stimulus;  in  the  case  of  anger, 
it  is  the  injury  of  the  offending  object;  in  sex,  it  is  the  repro- 
duction of  the  species,  etc.  There  is,  as  I  understand,  no 
dispute  on  this  point,  viz.,  that  instincts  are  adaptive  forms 
of  response.  This  statement  carries  no  implication  that  the 
purpose  is  a  conscious  one  or  that  it  has  been  instrumental 
in  molding  the  behavior.  The  statement  is  a  straightfor- 
ward, scientific,  objective  formulation,  implying  nothing  of 
vitalism  or  of  other  speculative  interpretations  of  the  place 
of  purpose  in  nature. 

Inasmuch  as  the  animals  below  man  give  as  yet  no  evi- 


262  WALTER  S.  HUNTER 

dence  of  possessing  the  behavior  equivalent  of  thought 
processes,  it  is  a  probable  assumption  that  they  never  possess 
an  awareness  of  the  purpose  of  their  acts.  At  some  time  in 
the  evolution  of  man,  therefore,  the  consciousness  of  the 
purpose  served  by  his  responses  has  appeared.  At  first, 
undoubtedly,  only  the  more  obvious  purposes  have  been 
grasped,  such  as  those  found  in  the  protective  reflexes, 
in  hunting,  in  display,  and  in  parental  behavior.  Particularly 
in  the  case  of  the  sex  instinct  there  is  reason  to  believe  that 
the  race  has  only  recently,  i.e.,  recently  as  one  estimates 
time  in  terms  of  man's  existence  on  the  earth,  discovered  the 
connection  between  the  sex  instinct  and  reproduction.  By 
way  of  illustration,  we  may  quote  from  Spencer  and  Gillen's 
account  of  the  tribes  of  Central  Australia.  Writing  in  1899, 
they  say:1 

"...  we  have  found  amongst  the  Arunta,  Luritcha,  and 
Ilpira  tribes,  and  probably  also  amongst  others  such  as  the 
Warramunga,  the  idea  firmly  held  that  the  child  is  not  the 
direct  result  of  intercourse,  that  it  may  come  without  this, 
which  merely,  as  it  were,  prepares  the  mother  for  the  recep- 
tion and  birth  also  of  an  already  formed  spirit  child  who 
inhabits  one  of  the  local  totem  centers.  Time  after  time  we 
have  questioned  them  on  this  point,  and  always  received 
the  reply  that  the  child  was  not  the  direct  result  of  inter- 
course." 

Writing  again  in  1904,  they  say:2 

"Indeed  Mr.  Roth's  latest  work  in  Queensland  shows 
clearly  that  the  idea  of  spirit  children  entering  women,  and 
that  sexual  intercourse  has  nothing  to  do  with  procreation, 
is  a  very  widespread  belief  amongst  the  Australian  aborigines, 
and  is  by  no  means  confined  to  the  tribes  amongst  whom  its 
existence  was -first  described  by  us"  (p.  xiii). 

"The  cermonies  [of  initiation]  can  never  have  had  any 
reference  directly  to  procreation,  for  the  simple  reason  that 
the  natives,  one  and  all  in  these  tribes,  believe  that  the  child 

1  Spencer,  B.  and  Gillen,  F.  J.,  'Native  Tribes  of  Central  Australia.'    New  York: 
1899,  p.  265. 

2  Spencer,  B.  and  Gillen,  F.  J.,  'Northern  Tribes  of  Central  Australia.'     New 
York:  1904,  Pp.  xiii  and  330-331. 


MODIFICATION  OF  INSTINCT  263 

is  the  direct  result  of  the  entrance  into  the  mother  of  an 
ancestral  spirit  individual.  They  have  no  idea  of  procreation 
as  being  directly  associated  with  sexual  intercourse,  and 
firmly  believe  that  children  can  be  born  without  this  taking 
place.  There  are,  for  example,  in  the  Arunta  country 
certain  stones  which  are  supposed  to  be  charged  with  spirit 
children  who  can,  by  magic,  be  made  to  enter  the  bodies  of 
women,  or  will  do  so  of  their  own  accord.  Again,  in  the 
Warramunga  tribe,  the  women  are  very  careful  not  to  strike 
the  trunks  of  certain  trees  with  an  axe,  because  the  blow  might 
cause  spirit  children  to  emanate  from  them  and  enter  their 
bodies.  They  imagine  that  the  spirit  is  very  minute, — 
about  the  size  of  a  small  grain  of  sand, — and  that  it  enters 
the  woman  through  the  navel  and  grows  within  her  into  the 
child." 

In  all  cases  a  definite  and  accurate  formulation  of  the 
adaptive  value  of  the  behavior  has  waited  upon  a  clear 
perception  of  cause  and  effect  relations  among  objects  and 
events,  which  in  many  cases  means  waiting  upon  scientific 
analysis.  Until  the  individual  and  society  know  the  biologi- 
cal purposes  of  instincts,  only  accident  can  identify  the 
purposes  which  society  approves  and  fosters  with  those 
which  heredity  is  seeking.  But  once  this  knowledge  is 
forthcoming,  society  and  the  individual  may  proceed  con- 
sciously and  definitely  to  foster  the  purpose,  or  they  may 
change  the  environment  in  such  a  way  that  the  biological 
purpose  can  give  way  to  a  new  purpose,  or,  finally,  the  biologi- 
cal purposes  may  be  satisfied  incidentally  so  far  as  the  con- 
scious plans  of  the  individuals  are  concerned. 

Nor  should  the  present  type  of  instinctive  modification 
be  confused  with  the  voluntary  exercise  of  a  response  that 
may  at  times  be  automatic  and  inherited.  Such  a  case 
would  occur  when  one  winks  voluntarily  at  a  joke,  and  so 
might  apparently  be  said  to  have  modified  the  biological 
purpose  of  protection  normally  subserved  by  this  response. 
In  order  to  subsume  the  winking  response  under  this  third 
type  of  modification,  the  winking  would  have  to  be  produced 
by  the  individual's  voluntarily  placing  himself  in  front  of  a 


264  WALTER  S.  HUNTER 

stimulus  which  would  automatically  bring  about  the  response 
and  then  for  a  social  purpose  which  might  or  might  not  be 
the  same  as  the  biological  one.  Perhaps  in  the  last  analysis 
so-called  voluntary  activity  is  precisely  of  this  nature,  con- 
sisting of  a  highly  elaborated  conditioned  reflex  whose 
stimulus  is  an  idea.  But  for  the  purposes  of  the  present 
discussion  there  is  an  active  participation  and  a  feeling  of 
control  in  voluntary  activity  which  contrasts  strikingly  with 
the  automatic,  impulsive,  compelling  characteristic  of  the 
instinctive  response  (characteristics  which  are  as  definitely 
present  when  the  instinct  is  "used"  for  social  purposes  as 
they  are  when  it  accomplishes  purely  biological  ones). 

The  two  great  modifications  which  have  been  made  in 
biological  purposes  appear  to  be  these:  (i)  purposes  which 
are  inimical  to  civilized  social  life  are  supplanted  by  new 
and  more  acceptable  ones;  and  (2)  the  biological  purposes  in 
all  of  the  more  powerful  instincts  are  occasionally  or  habi- 
tually secondary  to  the  use  of  the  instinctive  behavior  as  a 
pleasure  giver.  To  be  sure,  in  so  far  as  the  original  synaptic 
connections  persist — and  it  is  my  opinion  that  they  are 
rarely  if  ever  lost — the  original  biological  end  of  the  behavior 
will  tend  to  remain  and  be  satisfied,  although  perhaps  only 
surreptitiously. 

Table  I  has  been  drawn  up  with  reference  to  the  two  types 
of  cases  suggested  above.  Here  an  attempt  is  made  to  state 
the  biological  purposes  subserved  by  certain  of  the  instincts 
and  to  place  over  against  these  the  recognized  social  purposes 
which  usually  or  occasionally  dominate  them.  In  some  cases 
the  two  will  be  identical,  due  at  times  to  accident  and  at 
times  to  foresight.  The  principle  involved  in  this  third 
type  of  modification  of  instinct  is  not  dependent  for  its 
validity  upon  the  accuracy  of  the  analysis  of  Table  I.;  it  is 
dependent  rather  upon  the  fact  of  variation  between  the  two 
types  of  purpose  whose  detailed  nature  is  there  suggested. 

There  are  certain  features  of  Table  I.  which  invite  definite 
comment.  In  column  three  I  have  placed  only  what  have 
seemed  to  be  social  purposes  that  are  widely  recognized  in 
social  practice.  No  attempt  has  been  made  to  indicate 


MODIFICATION  OF  INSTINCT 


TABLE  I 

Iniiinct  Biological  PurpoM 

Anger Defense  of  organism  by  removing 


offending  object. 


Fear Defense  of  organism  by  removing 

it  from  offending  environment. 

Acquisitiveness.  .Accumulation  of  food  and  nest 
supplies. 


Vocalization 


.Stimulation  of  certain  instincts 
and  habits  in  associates. 


Social  Purpose  Definitely  Pottered 

*Used  in  hostility  and  competi- 
tion to  stimulate  great  en- 
deavor. Put  at  service  of 
customs. 

*Used  for  taboos  in  maintenance 
of  social  organization. 

*Accumulation  of  objects  posses- 
sing general  value  or  power  to 
satisfy  human  wants.  Fos- 
tering prestige. 

'Communication  of  ideas;  stimu- 
lation of  any  instinct  or  habit 
in  self  or  others. 

'Recreation,  health,  and  prestige. 

'Domination  in  all  fields  of 
activity. 

'Nourishment,  pleasure,  and  so- 
cial solidarity. 

Pleasure,  and  reproduction.  Be- 
getting of  offspring  in  order 
that  parents  may  be  cared  for 
in  sickness  and  old  age. 

'Protection  of  young. 

'Sex  excitant,  arousal  of  fear  in 
others,  prestige,  creation  of 
caste. 

Protection   from   "Great  Dan- 
ger,"   protection    of   morals, 
social  service. 
The  *  indicates  that  biological  purpose  is  not  specifically  combated. 

Present  occidental  society  fosters  all  instincts  in  some  degree  for  health  and 
pleasure  as  well  as  for  the  social  purposes  above  enumerated. 

the  vast  multiplicity  of  purposes  for  which  the  instincts  may 
on  occasion  be  used.  With  the  appearance  in  man  of  idea- 
tional  processes  and  ideational  methods  of  behavior  control, 
it  has  become  possible  to  use  the  instincts  not  for  their  biologi- 
cal ends  alone  but  for  almost  any  end  that  the  manipulator 
may  have  in  mind.  The  demagogue  and  the  propagandist 
by  placing  certain  stimuli  before  the  crowd  may  utilize 
the  resultant  fears,  angers,  acquisitivenesses,  or  religious 
activities  to  satisfy  ulterior  purposes  of  much  or  little  merit. 
This  is  a  matter  of  great  social  importance,  but  what  we  have 
indicated  in  the  table  differs  in  at  least  two  vital  ways  from 


Hunting Securing  of  food  and  mates. 

Rivalry Domination,  particularly  in  sex 

and  play  activities. 
Feeding Nourishment. 

Sex Reproduction. 


Parental Protection  of  young. 

Display Sex  excitant,  arousal  of  fear  in 

others. 


Religious Protection 

ger." 


from    "Great    Dan- 


866  WALTER  S.  HUNTER 

the  uses  of  instinct  made  by  the  individual  social  manipu- 
lator. In  the  first  place,  the  social  purposes  or  utilities 
there  listed  are  definitely  sanctioned  by  present  occidental 
society;  and  in  the  second  place,  the  individual  in  whom  the 
instinct  manifests  itself  may  be,  and  usually  is,  well  aware  of 
the  social  purpose  to  be  attained,  inasmuch  as  much  social 
or  group  effort  is  directed  toward  instructing  him  on  this  very 
point. 

So  far  as  our  analysis  can  reveal,  the  social  purposes  permit 
the  accomplishment  in  a  more  or  less  incidental  manner  of  the 
biological  purposes  without  any  attempt  to  combat  these 
purposes  save  in  the  case  of  the  sex  instinct  and  the  religious 
tendency.  In  the  hunting  instinct,  e.g.,  the  purposes  of 
recreation,  good  health,  and  prestige  are  not  incompatible 
with  the  food-  and  mate-getting  end;  nor  does  society  repress 
the  latter.  The  occasions  on  which  the  instinct  appears 
may  be  limited  by  law,  but  when  it  does  appear  the  biological 
end  to  be  attained  is  laudable.  This  is  true  also  in  the  cases 
of  fear,  anger,  and  the  other  responses  whose  social  purposes 
are  indicated  with  an  asterisk.  Society  definitely  favors  the 
use  of  display  (in  clothing  and  physical  prowess)  as  a  sex 
excitant  as  well  as  an  enhancer  of  prestige  and  a  creator  of 
class  distinction.  The  original  form  of  the  stimulus  and  re- 
sponse is  usually  modified,  and  sublimated  instincts  may  have 
been  -added  to  the  complex,  but  when  the  instinct  appears 
its  biological  purpose  is  approved.  In  the  case  of  the  religious 
tendency,  on  the  other  hand,  society  is  tending  to  negate 
the  biological  purpose  of  protection  from  great  danger  or  the 
mysterious  threat  (or  however  one  may  formulate  the  unseen 
characteristic  of  objects  with  which  primitive  man  seeks  to 
get  en  rapport. through  definite  religion  and  magic).1  In  its 
place  it  is  putting  social  service  and  the  maintenance  of  moral 
conduct  as  the  proper  goal  of  the  religious  impulse.  The 
change  is  not  that  of  stimulus  and  response  or  of  the  accretion 
of  other  instinctive  impulses  alone,  nor  is  it  a  limitation  of  the 

1 1  do  not  know,  of  course,  that  this  is  the  biological  purpose,  nor  am  I  certain 
that  the  religious  tendency  is  instinctive.  The  response  is,  however,  coextensive  with 
social  groups,  and  the  apparent  purposes  subserved  at  the  lowest  level  are  here  stated 
as  biological. 


MODIFICATION  OF  INSTINCT  167 

occasions  upon  which  the  impulse  may  manifest  itself.  This 
is  not  to  say  that  the  use  of  the  religious  tendency  as  a  defense 
mechanism  against  the  imperfections  of  the  present  does  not 
receive  great  social  sanction;  it  is  to  emphasize  that  much  of 
the  time,  and  in  some  groups  most  of  the  tim.e,  when  the 
behavior  appears,  its  biological  purpose  is  combated. 

Before  extending  our  comments  to  include  the  sex  instinct, 
we  may  best  return  and  take  up  the  thread  of  our  argument 
as  left  on  page  264  where  it  was  stated  that  the  second  funda- 
mental manner  in  which  biological  purposes  are  modified  is 
the  use  of  the  instinct  as  a  pleasure  giver.  It  should  be  noted 
that  with  all  instincts  (not  merely  with  that  of  sex)  there  is  a 
pleasure  and  satisfaction  m  the  experiencing  of  inherited 
muscular  and  glandular  activity  where  the  experiencer  is  free 
to  turn  his  attention  to  the  response  as  opposed  to  the  stimulus. 
In  the  arousal  of  the  instinct  under  conditions  that  realize  or 
tend  to  realize  the  biological  (and  certain  social)  purposes  of 
the  response,  the  attention  of  the  individual  is  definitely 
focused  upon  the  stimulus  which  initiates  and  controls  his 
behavior.  Thus  in  a  fire  where  the  individual  is  in  danger,  it 
is  not  the  emotional  thrill  which  is  in  the  focus  of  conscious- 
ness but  the  dangerous  aspects  of  the  situation.  The  by- 
standers, on  the  other  hand,  who  have  congregated,  can 
enjoy  the  thrills  of  fear  aroused  by  the  fire  because  in  the 
background  of  consciousness  is  the  understanding  that,  so  far 
as  they  are  involved,  it  is  all  make-believe.  It  is  beyond  our 
intention  to  offer  an  explanation  for  this  enjoyment  of  inherited 
forms  of  response  under  the  conditions  described;  it  is  enough 
to  indicate  the  fact  and  its  implications  for  the  modification 
of  instinct.  Within  the  limits  of  the  apparently  harmless, 
society  sanctions  the  arousal  of  instincts  for  purposes  of 
pleasure.  Forms  of  art  vie  one  with  another  in  subtle  stimu- 
lations of  the  instincts,  while  in  the  fringe  of  the  beholder's 
consciousness  the  feeling  of  make-believe  permits  him  to 
enjoy  the  resultant  behavior.  The  individual  confronts 
himself  upon  the  stage  and  the  screen  with  stimuli  for  all  of 
the  instincts — fear,  anger,  hunting,  acquisitiveness,  religion, 
sex,  etc. — and  then  enjoys  the  result  much  as  a  child  in  play 


a68  WALTER  S.  HUNTER 

will  pretend  the  existence  of  hobgobblins  in  order  to  enjoy 
the  thrill  of  fear,  or  wiggle  a  sore  tooth  or  finger  for  the  pleasure 
of  the  resultant  pain.1 

It  so  happens  that  the  sex  instinct  is  through  heredity 
accompanied  by  a  greater  pleasure  than  pertains  to  the 
exercise  of  any  other  instinct,  and  it  is  therefore  not  unex- 
expected  that  the  history  of  the  modifications  of  this  instinct 
should  be  peculiar.  In  the  animals  below  man,  where  there 
is  no  awareness  of  the  biological  end,  the  instinct  functions 
solely  for  reproduction.  No  social  purpose  exists.  The  use 
of  sex  for  pleasure,  so  far  as  I  know,  has  its  first  beginnings 
among  the  monkeys,  although  here  the  probable  absence 
of  thought  processes  would  count  against  its  conscious  use 
for  that  purpose.  Moreover,  among  primitive  men  and  even 
among  peoples  as  advanced  as  the  Central  Australian  natives, 
the  biological  purpose  of  reproduction  is  unknown  (undoubt- 
edly because  of  the  great  temporal  interval  between  the 
activity  of  the  instinct  and  the  birth  of  the  offspring),  and 
yet  there  is  sufficient  development  to  insure  the  presence  of 
definite  social  purposes.  The  result  is  that  the  sex  instinct  is 
recognized  by  society  as  a  type  of  behavior  whose  purpose  is 
the  production  of  pleasure.  Women  are  property,  and  the 
violation  of  chastity  is  the  violation  of  a  property  right. 

With  the  development  of  man  to  the  point  where  the 
biological  purpose  of  sex  is  understood,  comes  the  possibility 
that  society  and  the  individual  may  definitely  sanction  the 
biological  purpose.  This  they  have  done.  Certain  indi- 
viduals and  certain  groups  have  maintained  that  the  only 
conscious  purpose  to  be  sanctioned  is  the  biological  one; 
and  yet  in  practice  society  at  the  present  time  sanctions  the 
modification  of 'this  instinctive  behavior  by  utilizing  it  in  the 
ancient  manner  as  a  pleasure  mechanism.  This  it  does 
through  emphasis  upon  birth  control  and  the  make-believe 
stimulation  of  the  instinct  on  the  stage  and  in  certain  phases 
of  art  in  general. 

1 G.  T.  W.  Patrick  has  made  extensive  use  of  the  pleasurable  aspects  of  instinctive 
activities  as  they  appear  in  playful  form.  See  his  'Psychology  of  Relaxation.'  New 
York:  1916. 


MODIFICATION  OF  INSTINCT  269 

In  the  case  of  the  food-getting  instinct  society  and  the 
individual  do  not  at  present  combat  the  biological  purpose, 
although  they  do  relegate  it  to  the  background  and  satisfy 
it  incidentally  in  many  cases.  In  instances  of  perversion, 
however,  the  nutritive  purpose  has  been  definitely  combated. 
Thus  it  is  said  that  the  Roman  voluptuaries  practised  arti- 
ficial vomiting  in  order  that  their  banquets  might  proceed 
unhindered  by  the  limited  capacity  of  the  individual.  While 
our  own  banquets  lack  this  interesting  feature,  nevertheless 
they  are  conducted  for  pleasure  and  not  for  the  purposes  of 
nutrition.  Custom  has  from  time  immemorial  recognized 
the  effect  on  social  solidarity  of  "breaking  bread"  together, 
utilizing  the  pleasurable  aspects  of  feeding  in  the  creation  of 
consciousness  of  kind.  This  and  similar  uses  of  instinct  to 
satisfy  social  rather  than  biological  purposes  is  fundamental 
in  understanding  social  phenomena. 

IV 

Summary. — The  social  significance  of  instinct  cannot  be 
brought  out  by  analyses  of  the  nature  of  specific  forms  of 
response,  but  must  come  largely  from  a  consideration  of  the 
types  of  modification  that  instinctive  forms  of  behavior  under- 
go. These  variations  come  fundamentally  from  the  influence 
of  habits  and  other  forms  of  intelligent  behavior.  The  present 
paper  has  elaborated  the  topic  with  reference  to  the  following 
points:  (i)  Modifications  of  the  structural  elements,  including 
(a)  changes  of  the  stimulus  in  its  external  or  internal  aspect, 
(&)  changes  of  the  somatic  or  of  the  visceral  response,  and 
(c)  combinations  of  these  in  sublimated  behavior;  (2)  the  tem- 
poral position  of  the  modification  as  it  occurs  before  or  after 
the  initial  appearance  of  the  instinct;  and  (3)  modifications 
of  the  biological  purpose  or  adaptive  value  of  the  response. 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE 

BY  ELCANON  ISAACS 

University  of  Cincinnati 

Recent  years  have  witnessed  a  marked  decrease  in  the 
number  of  contributions  to  the  experimental  psychology  of 
rhythm.  Dunlap,  writing  in  1916,  remarks,  "It  is  a  signifi- 
cant fact  that  experimental  work  on  the  perception  of  time 
and  of  rhythm  has  nearly  ceased.  One  research  on  time,  a 
statistical  study  of  speech  rhythm  and  a  minor  study  on 
rhythm  effects  are  all  that  have  appeared  in  the  last  two 
years"  (7,  p.  206).  With  the  exceptions  of  one  or  two  studies, 
this  statement  is  still  applicable;  in  fact,  the  subject  of  time 
and  rhythm  has  been  dropped  from  the  reviews  in  alternate 
years. 

The  reason  for  the  discontinuance  of  scientific  work  in 
this  field  is  not  a  knowledge  of  all  the  facts  about  rhythm,  for 
such  is  not  the  case,  but  the  lack  of  a  working  hypothesis 
for  the  nature  of  the  rhythmic  experience.  The  tentative 
bases  which  have  existed  up  to  this  time  have  been  given  up, 
for  the  greater  part,  as  the  result  of  a  tendency  to  eliminate 
time  as  an  element  of  rhythm  perception,  and  of  the  recogni- 
tion of  rhythm  in  others  than  the  auditory  field.  Although 
these  factors  are  the  necessary  result  of  each  other,  it  is  not 
until  recently  that  they  have  been  recognized,  and  that  more 
than  one  aspect  of  the  rhythm  experience  has  become  subject 
to  analysis. 

The  earliest  introspective  and  empirical  studies,1  and  the 
modern  theories  of  literary  scholars,  although  characteris- 

1Briicke,  'Die  physiologischen  Grundlagen  der  neuhochdeutschen  Verskunst', 

1871  (5). 

Riemann,  '  Katechismus  der  Musik,'  1888,  p.  I  (36). 
Lobe,  'Katechismus  der  Musik,'  25  Aufl.,  1893,  p.  4  (20). 
Sully,  'The  Human  Mind,'  Vol.  i,  1892,  p.  271  (54). 
Lanier,  'The  Science  of  English  Verse,  '1880,  p.  62  (19). 
Gurney,  'The  Power  of  Sound,'  1880,  p.  127  (12). 

270 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE  *7J 

tically  vague,1  have  not  seriously  questioned  the  necessity  of 
an  absolute  regularity  in  the  recurrence  of  the  objective 
elements.  The  view  represented  and  assumed  by  them,  has 
given  way  in  the  case  of  the  former,  under  the  influence  of 
studies  pursued  under  experimental  conditions,  until  in  1903 
MacDougall  wrote:  "There  is  properly  no  repetition  of 
identical  sequences  in  rhythm.  Practically  no  rhythm  to 
which  the  aesthetic  subject  gives  expression,  or  which  he 
apprehends  in  a  series  of  stimulations,  is  constituted  of  the 
unvaried  repetition  of  a  single  elementary  form"  (22,  p.  319). 

Under  experimental  conditions,  rhythm  was  also  removed 
from  the  field  of  objective  stimulation,2  to  the  field  of  sub- 
jective perception,3  and  firually  to  that  of  motor  experience 
in  time.4  There  has  likewise  been  a  tendency  to  limit  the 
definition  of  rhythm  greatly,  from  the  cosmic  recurrences  of 
the  universe  (3,  p.  146),  to  the  field  of  human  experience 
(38,  p.  305),  and  here  to  the  voluntary  as  opposed  to  the 
organic  rhythms  (27,  p.  3). 

Although   most  of  the  experiments  with   the  voluntary 

1  Guest,  'A  History  of  English  Versification,'  1882,  p.  I  (10). 

Schipper,  'History  of  English  Versification,'  1910,  p.  3  (42). 

Gummere,  'A  Handbook  of  Poetics,'  1885,  p.  134  (xx). 

Alden,  'An  Introduction  to  Poetry,'  1909,  p.  156  (i). 

Mayor,  'Chapters  on  English  Meter,'  1901,  p.  4  (24). 

Omond,  'A  Study  of  Meter,'  1903,  p.  2  (30). 

Saintsbury,  'Historical  Manual  of  English  Prosody,'  1910,  p.  291  (40). 

Matthews,  'A  Study  of  Versification,'  1911,  p.  12  (23). 

1  Kostlin,  'Aesthetik,'  1869,  p.  90  (17). 

Riemann,  'Elemente  der  musikalischen  Aesthetik,'  1900,  p.  135  (37). 

Cf.  Wundt,  'Grundziige  der  physiologischen  Psychologic,'  III.,  1903,  p.  158  (64). 

1  Squire,  'A  Genetic  Study  of  Rhythm,'  A.  J.  Psy.,  XII.,  1901,  p.  586  (50). 

Meumann,  'Untersuchungen  zur  Psychologic  und  Aesthetik  des  Rhythmus,' 
Phil.  Stud.,  X.,  1894,  pp.  272,  304  (25). 

*  Miner,  'Motor,  Visual  and  Applied  Rhythms,'  PSY.  REV.  MONOG.,  V.,  1903 
(^7). 

MacDougall,  R.,  'The  Relation  of  Auditory  Rhythm  to  Nervous  Discharge,' 
PSY.  REV.,  IX.,  1902,  p.  466  (21). 

Stetson,  'A  Motor  Theory  of  Rhythm  and  Discrete  Succession,'  PSY.  REV., 
XII.,  1905,  p.  258  (52). 

Ruckmich,  'The  Role  of  Kinsesthesis  in  the  Perception  of  Rhythm,'  A.  ].  Psy., 
XXIV.,  1913,  p.  305(38). 

Weld,  'An  Experimental  Study  of  Musical  Enjoyment,'  A.  J.  Psy.,  XXIII., 
1912,  p.  298  (59). 

Patterson,  'The  Rhythm  of  Prose,'  1916  (31). 


272  ELCANON  ISAACS 

rhythms  were  in  the  auditory  field  because  of  the  comparative 
ease  of  experimentation,  it  is  a  curious  fact  that  writers  of 
general  accounts  and  text-books  consider  rhythm  possible 
only  in  certain  fields,  whereas  special  investigators  are  con- 
fident that  it  is  theoretically  possible  in  every  field.  Thus 
Miner  says:  "There  would  be  no  reason  a  priori  why  a  series 
of  stimuli  addressed  to  any  one  sense  should  not  produce  an 
experience  of  rhythm.  I  am  quite  confident  that  they  would 
under  proper  circumstances;  that  rhythms  of  smell,  taste, 
touch  or  vision  are  just  as  possible  as  rhythms  of  hearing" 
(27,  p.  40).  So  Meumann,  with  temporal  qualifications  (25, 
p.  261);  and  according  to  Wundt,  'no  series  of  impressions 
exists  that  cannot  in  some  way  be  comprehended  as  rhythmic* 
(64,  p.  62).  Ruckmich  asks  whether  a  rhythm  cannot  be 
induced  which  shall  be  perceived  principally  in  terms  of 
those  sensations  that  correspond  directly  to  the  nature  of  the 
stimuli  given  (39,  p.  247);  and  Woodrow:  "To  produce  an 
impression  of  rhythm,  it  is  necessary  to  have  a  series  of 
stimuli,"  enumerating  some  (60,  p.  5);  and  Dunlap:  "The 
facts  seem  to  be  that  all  sorts  of  sensations  lend  themselves 
to  serial  grouping"  (6,  p.  350). 

Such  pervasiveness  of  rhythm,  however,  is  not  understood 
by  writers  of  general  accounts  and  elementary  texts.  For 
them,  rhythm  is  limited  to  definite  fields  of  sensation,  to  the 
auditory,  kinsesthetic,  tactual  and  visual  fields  (34,  p.  329); 
to  the  first  three  (29,  p.  301);  to  the  first  two  (8,  p.  484); 
to  the  first  (18,  p.  389);  and  according  to  Titchener,  there  is 
rhythm  in  one  and  only  one  field,  the  kinsesthetic  (56,  p.  345). 
From  this,  it  can  be  seen  that  the  special  investigators  did 
not  hesitate  to  generalize  from  their  limited  results,  but  that 
the  general  accounts  were  more  cautious,  and  did  not  theorize. 
Among  neither  group,  however,  is  there  agreement.  The 
result  has  been  a  condition  chaotic  in  the  extreme.  In  1917 
Ruckmich  wrote:  "Much  experimentation  has  been  done 
in  the  last  two  and  a  half  decades  on  the  general  subject  of 
rhythm.  Theories  have  almost  equalled  these  attempts  in 
number,  and  difficulties  have  arisen  out  of  all  proportion  to 
the  facts  discovered"  (39,  p.  326). 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE      *73 

THE  RHYTHM  OF  PROSE 

In  the  latter  part  of  1916,  however,  appeared  a  new  and 
important  contribution  to  the  rhythm  of  prose  (31),  in  which 
it  is  stated  unequivocally  that  a  'new  standard'  is  established 
'for  passing  judgment  upon  the  rhythm  of  a  sentence  or 
paragraph'  (p.  13).  Although  the  title  refers  to  the  rhythm 
of  prose,  the  book  is  concerned  with  the  nature  of  rhythm 
in  general. 

From  the  example  of  syncopating  rhythms  of  Indian 
music,  where  there  are  two  levels  of  rhythmic  stimulation, 
often  in  different  times,  as  a  melody  in  three-time  against 
a  tom-tom  accompaniment  in  four-time  (p.  xx),  it  is  suggested 
as  the  'new  standard,'  that  all  rhythm  is  composed  of  two 
levels,  an  objective  level  and  a  subjective  temporal  measuring 
scale  of  'unitary  pulses,'  'elastic*  in  their  nature  (p.  xx). 
"The  'boom!  boom!  boom!'  of  subjective  time-units,  such  as 
rattle  along  in  the  consciousness  of  an  aggressively  rhythmic 
person,  may  be  accelerated  or  retarded,  within  certain  limits 
defined  for  each  such  individual,  without  destroying  their 
value  as  a  subjective  foot-rule  with  which  to  correlate  all 
experience"  (p.  47). 

The  origin  of  the  subjective  time-unit  may  be  the  breath- 
ing rate.  "  Segments  of  breath-waves,  each  segment  marked 
by  a  slight  reinforcement  in  the  flow  of  air,  and  measured, 
in  turn,  by  so  many  concomitant  heart-beats — when  these 
are  consciously  felt — may  easily  register  for  us  our  mental 
seconds.  It  is  only  by  such  mental  time-beats  or  'unitary 
pulses'  that  we  are  able  to  make  anything  like  accurate 
judgments  of  time.  Suppressed  articulation  usually  assists 
us  in  counting;  our  memory  images  record  the  number" 
(32,  p.  259).  Or  the  origin  of  the  subjective  time-unit  may 
be  the  walking  rate,  and  the  memory  of  it,  the  basis  of 
measuring.  'Perhaps,  as  each  step  is  taken,  the  concomitant 
tension  of  some  obscure  muscle  of  the  head  occurs,  which 
thus  furnishes  the  means  of  repeating  the  walking-rate,  with- 
out carrying  the  innervation  as  far  as  the  legs'  (31,  p.  65). 

Both  levels,  that  of  the  objective  stimulation,  and  that 


274  ELCANON  ISAACS 

of  the  subjective  time-units  are  characterized  by  (i)  accelera- 
tion and  retarding  (pp.  3,  47),  (2)  substitution  of  one  long 
time-interval  for  several  equivalent  short  ones,  or  vice  versa 
(p.  3),  and  (3)  syncopation,  by  which  is  meant  the  correlation 
of  two  sets  of  time-intervals,  concomitant  but  not  coincident 
(p.  4),  as  in  the  case  of  the  Indian  music  mentioned  above. 
"The  impression  which  results  from  the  combination  in  con- 
sciousness of  the  auditory  (syllabic)  sensations  (including 
their  effect  upon  attention)  and  the  subjective  time-units, 
may  be  compared  to  a  melody  and  its  accompaniment,  with 
attention  focussed,  not  upon  the  pitch  relations  so  much  as 
upon  the  relations  of  time  and  stress"  (p.  69).  The  'new 
standard'  makes  rhythm  a  temporal  affair  in  that  the  sub- 
jective 'unitary  pulses'  measure  time.  "The  ultimate  basis 
of  all  rhythmic  experience,  however,  is  the  same.  To  be 
clear-cut,  it  must  rest  upon  a  series  of  definite  temporal 
units"  (p.  xxii). 

VISUAL  AND  AUDITORY  RHYTHM 

Almost  side  by  side  with  this  study  appeared  a  new  con- 
tribution by  Ruckmich  in  the  field  of  visual  rhythm  (39, 
p.  231).  Miner  in  1903  found  that  "the  experience  of  rhythm 
in  the  field  of  vision  is  identical  in  its  essentials  with  that  in 
the  auditory  field.  Since  the  experience  is  novel,  it  is  at  first 
more  vague  than  with  sounds,  but  it  becomes  quite  precise 
with  practice"  (27,  p.  71).  Koffka  has  concluded  that  "no 
essential  difference  between  auditory  and  visual  rhythm  has 
shown  itself,"  that  'series  of  visual  imagery  can  be  the  sole 
associates  of  the  experience  of  rhythm,'  that  'for  rhythmical 
experiences  visual  and  auditory  images  are  equivalent  through- 
out' (16,  pp.  96-97). 

From  these  and  other  considerations  of  visual  rhythm 
(39,  p.  23 2f.),  it  seems  clear  that  visual  rhythm  cannot  be 
placed  in  a  category  different  than  that  of  the  auditory. 
"All  of  the  special  studies  which  have  been  undertaken  in 
this  field  are  at  one  in  pointing  out  that  visual  rhythm  does 
not  differ  essentially  from  any  other  kind  of  rhythm"  (p.  236). 
Nevertheless,  Ruckmich  has  found  that  a  purely  visual 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE  «75 

rhythm  can  be  experienced  as  such  (p.  247),  that  "it  is 
possible  to  obtain  rhythmical  perceptions  from  stimuli  that 
are  visually  presented  and  that  differ  objectively  only  in 
color  quality.  It  is  furthermore  possible  to  obtain  from  such 
stimuli  experiences  of  rhythm  which  are  visual  in  their  very 
essence,  i.e.,  in  which  no  other  processes  play  an  important 
part"  (p.  253). 

TIME  AND  RHYTHM 

Although  it  may  not  appear  so  at  first  sight,  there  is  a 
distinct  conflict  in  the  field  of  rhythm  between  the  results 
of  Patterson  and  Ruckmich.  It  is  in  the  application  of  the 
'new  standard'  to  visual  rhythm  that  difficulty  arises.  It  is 
not  clear  the  part  that  'unitary  pulses  of  subjective  time' 
whose  rate  is  'about  .7  sec.'  (31,  p.  67),  would  play  in  a 
rhythm  induced  in  terms  of  stimuli  that  are  not  auditory, 
but  visual.  Visual  rhythm  can  result  from  stimuli  in  terms 
of  difference  of  color  quality  (39,  p.  253),  of  difference  of 
intensity  of  the  members  (38,  p.  356),  and  what  is  of  greatest 
importance,  in  terms  of  spatial  structure,1  as  well  as  from  the 
duration  (27,  p.  71),  and  temporal  arrangement  of  the  mem- 
bers (16,  p.  104).  Because  of  the  nature  of  rhythmic  stimula- 
tion, time  is  an  element  but  it  is  ancillary  to  the  rhythm. 
It  is  a  prominent  item  in  auditory  rhythm,  since,  because  of 
the  nature  of  the  end-organ,  only  series  of  discrete  stimuli 
can  be  presented.  Visual  rhythm,  likewise,  is  temporal  in  the 
aspect  of  serial  stimulation,  in  that,  since  two  stimuli  cannot 
occupy  the  same  place  at  once,  one  must  follow  the  other  in  a 
time  sequence. 

While,  therefore,  it  is  true  that  recurrence  is  present  in 
rhythm,  and  takes  place  in  time,  it  does  not  follow  that  the 
perception  of  rhythm  is  due  to  a  measurement  of  the  recur- 
rence by  a  'subjective  foot-rule.'  Recurrence  measured  by 
time  as  an  integral  part  of  rhythm  involves  a  confusion  of 
one  of  the  physical  factors  of  rhythm  with  the  nature  of 
rhythm.  According  to  Squire,  'Temporalness,  in  its  connota- 

1  Mcumann,  op.  cit.,  p.  262  (25). 
Koffa,  op.  cit.,  p.  97  (16). 
Miner,  op.  cit.,  p.  43  (27). 


276  ELCANON  ISAACS 

tion  of  regular  succession,  is  the  basal  principle  of  rhythm. 
This,  however,  is  quite  another  thing  than  saying  that  the 
character  of  the  grouping  is  dependent  upon  the  time  order" 
(50,  p.  541).  As  Stetson  points  out:  "The  time  judgment  is 
much  too  vague  to  determine  rhythmic  intervals,  and  accurate 
judgments  of  time  founded  on  rhythms  are  secondary  and 
derived"  (51,  p.  258). 

If  absolute  periodicity  were  indispensable  in  rhythm,  a 
subjective  temporal  measuring  scale  would  be  necessary  to 
ascertain  whether  rhythm  were  present  or  not.  It  has  been 
shown,  however,  that  regularity  of  recurrence  is  not  char- 
acteristic of  rhythm  (22,  p.  319).  What  function,  then,  can 
a  temporal  measuring  scale  have,  unless  to  show  that  the 
recurrence  is  irregular?  Yet  regular  recurrence  is  not  of 
itself  felt  as  unrhythmical.  Nor  can  the  time  'pulses'  be  a 
measuring  scale  as  to  whether  the  rhythm  can  be  attended  to. 
The  action  of  attention  is  organic  in  its  nature;  in  any  case, 
its  duration  need  not  be  subjectively  measured.  The  only 
function  a  temporal  measuring  scale  could  have  would  be 
as  a  test  for  the  presence  of  rhythm,  and  then  only  for 
irregular  rhythm.  An  illustration  may  make  the  relation 
clear.  A  clock  is  a  temporal  measuring  scale  for  the  recur- 
rence of  night  and  day.  But  night  and  day  are  not  dependent 
on  the  clock  for  their  recurrence.  Rhythm  takes  place  in 
time,  but  time  is  not  rhythm.  According  to  Brown:  "The 
regularity  of  the  motor  performance  and  the  equivalence  of 
the  resulting  feelings  lead  naturally  to  the  introduction  of 
the  impression  of  temporal  regularity;  but  that  impression 
is  really  subsequent  to  the  rhythm  itself"  (4,  p.  44). 

There  is  a  further  objection  to  a  rhythm  based  on  time 
measurement  as  determined  by  the  'new  standard.'  Patter- 
son says  that  on  the  appearance  of  objective  stimuli  'sufficient 
in  number  to  suggest  serial  grouping'  there  is  an  adjustment 
of  the  'pulses'  by  means  of  instinctive  processes  (31,  p.  66). 
This  would  mean  that  a  constant  experience  of  rhythm  would 
continue  during  the  greater  part  of  waking  consciousness  from 
presented  stimuli,  whether  organized  or  not.  This  is  not  the 
case;  the  experience  of  rhythm  is  unique  and  unmistakable. 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE  a 77 

Finally,  visual  rhythm  may  take  place  in  space.  "The 
perception  of  rhythm  may  be  aroused  by  visual  impressions, 
whether  by  simple  series  of  discrete  stimuli,  presented  under 
laboratory  conditions,  or  by  the  sight  of  rafters  on  a  corridor 
ceiling,  or  of  the  recurring  ornaments  of  a  facade"  (56,  p.  345). 
Miner  says,  "There  seems  to  be  good  reasons  for  believing 
that  the  perception  of  groups  among  repeated  decorative 
figures,  lines,  etc.,  is  a  real  rhythmical  experience  depending 
upon  the  repetition  of  a  like  accompaniment  of  strain  sensa- 
tions" (27,  p.  43).  Lastly  Koffka  found  that  visual  rhythm 
may  "easily  assume,  especially  in  the  higher  groups  of  beats, 
a  spatial  structure"  (16,  p.  97).  "We  will  merely  say  this, 
that  according  to  the  result  of  this  study,  we  can  speak  about 
rhythm  in  space  just  as  in  poetry  or  music.  Aside  from 
motor  and  auditory  impressions  and  independent  of  them, 
purely  visual  impressions  can  serve  as  the  sensory  basis  of 
group  formations,  and  as  a  starting  point  of  that  inner 
activity  which  conditions  accent  and  thereby  rhythm.  In 
the  space  arts,  we  find  this  realized  in  the  repetition  of  an 
ornament  to  a  considerable  extent.  The  eye  moves  along 
and  keeps  meeting  the  same  forms,  and  in  this  way,  rhythm 
arises"  (p.  109). 

If  visual  rhythm  differs  from  the  auditory  so  as  to  have  a 
different  basis  for  its  experience,  it  will  be  necessary  to  assume 
a  heterogeneous  nature  for  rhythm.  Many  factors  point, 
however,  to  its  homogeneity.  First  of  these  is  the  pre- 
dominant presence  in  both  of  kinsesthesis  (39,  p.  249).  Then 
there  is  the  appearance,  in  both,  of  the  secondary  character- 
istics of  rhythm,  accentuation  and  grouping  (p.  245).  There 
are  also  similar  illusions  in  visual  rhythm,  "apparently  the 
same  as  those  that  have  been  noticed  by  other  observers 
for  sounds.  They  include  the  lengthening  of  the  interval 
between  groups,  the  intensive  accent,  and  the  shortening 
of  the  time  between  unaccented  units  in  the  three-group" 
(27,  pp.  67-68).  Ruckmich  says,  "Many  of  the  phenomena 
which  accompany  other  kinds  of  rhythm  manifested  them- 
selves. Intervals  were  under- and  over-estimated;  attributes 
were  subjectively  assigned  to  the  members;  subjective  rhyth- 


278  ELCANON  ISAACS 

mization   occurred;    and   redistribution   of  the   groups   was 
common"  (39,  p.  254). 

KlNJESTHESIS    IN    RHYTHM 

Tentatively  eliminating  time  as  an  integral  part  of  the 
rhythm  experience,  we  must  return  to  the  predominant 
elements  which  are  characteristic  of  rhythm  in  general. 
Titchener,  believing  that  rhythm  was  homogeneous  in  its 
nature,  had  come  to  the  conclusion  that  there  was  one  and 
only  one  rhythm,  the  ultimate  basis  of  which  was  kinaesthetic. 
"The  author  was  formerly  disposed  to  attribute  a  separate 
rhythmical  perception  to  hearing,  but  recent  observation  has 
convinced  him  of  the  existence  of  kinsesthetic  sensations  due 
to  the  contraction  of  the  tensor  tympani  of  the  middle  ear" 
(56,  p.  345).  As  to  rhythm  aroused  by  visual  impressions,  "in 
the  author's  opinion,  this  rhythm  is  always  kinaesthetic,  based 
upon  eye-movement,  upon  slight  movements  which  tick  off 
the  successive  impressions,  or  upon  some  other  form  of  inter- 
mittent kinsesthesis"  (p.  345). 

The  importance  of  the  kinaesthetic  factors  had,  however, 
been  pointed  out  as  early  as  in  Bolton's  work.  "Each  im- 
pression as  it  enters  into  consciousness  tends  to  find  expression 
in  a  muscular  movement  ..."  (3,  p.  325).  Even  before, 
Gurney,  than  whom  there  were  few  keener  observers,  had 
called  attention  to  them — "let  the  sounds  become  regular, 
and  instantly  the  impulse  comes  to  tap  the  hand  or  move  the 
foot  concurrently  with  them"  (12,  p.  128).  They  have  been 
pointed  out  numerous  times  since.  "By  far  the  greater 
number  of  investigators  and  systematic  writers  on  the  subject 
of  rhythm  emphasize  the  primary  importance  of  kinaesthesis 
and  of  motor  response  in  rhythmical  perceptions"  (38,  pp. 
308-9). 

Ruckmich,  however,  who  says  "in  point  not  only  of 
frequency  of  occurrence  but  of  the  importance  of  the  part 
played,  motor  factors  are  almost  indispensable  items  in  the 
rhythmical  consciousness"  (39,  pp.  246-7),  states  that  after 
rhythm  is  initiated  it  may  continue  in  the  absence  of  kinaes- 
thesis (38,  pp.  342,  359).  Bolton,  however,  says  that  if 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE  «79 

movements  were  attempted  to  be  restrained  in  one  muscle 
they  were  likely  to  appear  elsewhere  (3,  p.  234).  Meyer 
(26,  p.  37)  and  MacDougall  (21,  p.  466)  found  that  the 
activity  need  not  be  visible  in  order  to  give  feelings  of  move- 
ment, and  Miner  states  that  one  subject  who  gave  'no  re- 
sponse whatever  to  the  metronome  beat  with  her  hand,  head 
or  body'  showed  considerable  reflex  response  to  the  beats 
under  hypnosis  (27,  p.  2fi.}.  Lastly  Weld  found  "when 
actual  movements  were  inhibited  one  of  three  things  usually 
occurred.  In  some  cases  the  rhythmic  effect  was  decreased; 
in  others  a  tendency  to  movement  appeared  in  some  other 
part  of  the  body;  or,  again  a  motor  image  or  a  visual  image 
served  as  a  substitute  for  the  actual  movement"  (59,  p.  265). 
We  can  therefore  disregard  Ruckmich's  statement  that 
rhythm  may  continue  in  the  absence  of  kinaesthetic  processes. 

Mere  kinaesthesis,  however,  as  Titchener  thought,  is  not 
sufficient  of  itself  to  explain  rhythm.  It  limits  rhythm  to  the 
kinaesthetic  field  as  Patterson's  theory  limits  it  to  the  auditory 
field.  Ruckmich  has  demonstrated  a  visual  rhythm  distinct 
from  both.  In  addition,  as  Ruckmich  has  pointed  out,  the 
kinaesthetic  factors  although  most  prominent  in  the  organs 
to  which  the  stimuli  are  directed,  are  present  in  other  fields 
as  well  as  in  the  field  of  stimulation  (39,  p.  246),  and  the 
clearest  part  of  the  perception  are  the  sensations  and  images 
corresponding  to  the  stimuli  given  (p.  254).  It  is  for  this 
reason  that  he  rejects  the  kinaesthetic  basis  of  rhythm. 

Since,  however,  the  kinaesthetic  factors  are  present  in  all 
rhythms,  it  may  be  well  to  inquire  into  their  nature.  Prac- 
tically no  work  has  been  done  on  the  nature  and  degree  of 
stimulus  as  affecting  the  motor  response  in  rhythm.  The 
contributions  which  treated  of  the  latter  simply  recorded 
they  were  present  and  made  little  or  no  attempt  to  localize 
and  measure  them  as  to  comparative  rate,  intensity,  quality, 
or  to  differentiate  rates  as  manifested  through  different  organs. 
Bolton  suggested  there  must  be  different  degrees  of  muscular 
activity  depending  on  intensity  of  stimulus  (3,  p.  235),  and 
Weld  recorded  larger  muscular  movements  corresponding  to 
the  musical  phrase  (59,  p.  266).  Accurate  work  has,  how- 


«8o  ELCANON  ISAACS 

ever,  been  done  on  the  reflex  response  in  another  connection, 
and  a  grading  of  intensity  found  (47,  p.  71).  But  the  most 
important  item  and  the  basis  of  the  rhythm  experience  is 
found  in  the  following:  "The  rhythm  of  the  reflex  has  prac- 
tically the  same  frequence  whether  the  reflex  be  excited 
strongly  or  feebly:  thus,  whether  the  amplitude  of  the  con- 
tractions be  great  or  small,  they  recur  with  practically  the 
same  frequence"  (p.  122). 

THE  BASIS  OF  RHYTHM 

A  consideration  of  the  essential  elements  in  the  various 
theories  of  rhythm  formulated  from  Bolton  to  Patterson 
will  show  that  a  single  hypothesis  was  in  every  case  at 
the  basis  of  their  demonstrations.  Preliminary  experiments 
show  that  the  motor  response  except  for  simple  forms  and 
certain  rates  of  rhythmic  stimulation,  is  independent  of  the 
rate  of  the  stimulus.  This  has  been  widely  recognized,  but 
not  acted  upon.1  It  is  clear  that  the  reflex  response  in  rhythm 
'represents  a  relatively  undifferentiated  type  of  reaction'  in 
response  to  stimulus  (21,  p.  474),  but  there  are  several 
elements  of  reflex  response  which  have  been  overlooked  when 
it  was  advanced  as  an  explanation  of  rhythmic  activity. 

First  of  these  is  that  in  the  reflex  arc  conduction,  as  shown 
by  Schafer,  the  rhythm  of  the  discharge  of  the  motor  cell  is 
totally  different  from  that  of  the  action  induced  in  the 
afferent  cell  by  stimulation  (41,  p.  613).  In  the  nerve  trunk 
conduction,  on  the  other  hand,  there  is  a  close  correspondence 
between  the  rhythm  of  the  stimulus  and  the  rhythm  of  the 
end-effect.  It  was  this  latter  correspondence  which  was 
erroneously  made  the  basis  of  the  motor  theories  of  rhythm. 
But  if,  on  the  contrary,  the  motor  reaction  is  a  serial  reflex 
response  resulting  from  stimulation,  the  rate  of  response  of 
the  organ  cannot  depend  on  the  rate  of  the  stimulus  given. 
This  is  the  point  of  departure  from  all  theories  of  rhythm 
heretofore. 

1  MacDougall,  PSY.  REV.,  IX.,  p.  474  (21). 

Stetson,  Harv.  Psy.  Stud.,  I,  1903,  p.  458;  PSY.  REV.  MONOG.,  IV.,  1903,  p.  458 

(Si). 

Sherrington,  op,  cit.,  p.  71  (47). 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE}  »8i 

It  has  long  been  recognized  that  each  organ  has  a  rate  of 
response  characteristic  and  constant  for  its  particular  activity. 
This  rate  has  usually  been  called  the 'natural  rate.'1  Scrip- 
ture defines  it  as  the  rate  in  which  one  'can  perform  the 
greatest  number  of  movements  with  the  least  fatigue'  (44, 
p.  181),  and  cites  the  'route'  step  on  long  marches  where 
each  man  chooses  his  own  step  (45,  p.  107).  Smith  says  that 
every  one  has  his  own  rate  which  is  variable  within  set  limits 
(48,  p.  82),  and  Patterson  tries  to  correlate  the  different  rates 
for  various  activities  in  the  case  of  each  individual  (31,  p.  148). 
As  Weld  found,  'we  estimate  tempo  in  terms  of  our  momen- 
tary ability  to  make  that  motor  response  which  seems  to  be 
most  fitting  for  the  particular  composition  which  constitutes 
our  stimulus'  (59,  p.  268),  and  according  to  Squire,  the 
'natural  rate  of  the  individual'  is  the  basis  of  the  pleasantness 
of  rhythm  (50,  p.  588).  Scripture,  furthermore,  has  shown 
that  the  natural  rate  varies  with  practice,  fatigue,  time  of  day, 
general  health,  and  external  conditions  of  resistance  (46,  p. 
528).  The  determining  elements  of  this  rate  are  certain 
structural  and  physiological  factors. 

STRUCTURAL  FACTORS 

The  rhythmical  reflex,  the  response  sometimes  resulting 
from  continuous  stimuli,  as,  for  instance,  the  scratch  reflex, 
is  subject  to  a  certain  periodicity  in  its  functioning.  It  is 
not  only  at  a  frequency  independent  of  the  rate  of  stimulation, 
but  does  not  change  for  various  modes  of  excitation,  for 
grouped  succession  of  stimuli,  or  for  variation  in  the  intensity 
of  the  stimulus  (47,  p.  45f.)«  In  other  words,  its  period  of 
vibration  is  constant  (p.  122).  The  rhythmical  reflex  because 
of  its  periodicity  may  be  said  to  be  pendular  in  its  character. 
Confirmatory  of  this  is  the  periodic  nature  and  constancy  of 
the  rate  of  response  (p.  122),  its  tendency  toward  regularity 
regardless  of  the  number  of  stimuli  (41,  p.  613),  its  inde- 
pendence of  the  tempo  of  the  rhythm  and  the  amplitude  of 

1  Stevens,  'On  the  Time-sense,'  Mind,  XL,  1886,  p.  393  f.  (53). 

Scripture,  'The  Law  of  Rhythmic  Movement,'  Science,  IV.,  n.s.,  1896,  p.  535  (43). 

Scripture,  'The  New  Psychology,'  1899,  p.  181  (44). 


282  ELCANON  ISAACS 

the  movement  (47,  p.  122).  In  terms  of  the  law  of  the 
pendulum,  the  amplitude  of  the  reflex  varies  directly  with 
the  nature  of  the  stimulus,  but  the  period  of  vibration  char- 
acteristic of  the  organ  remains  constant. 

The  periodicity  of  the  rhythmical  reflex  is  bound  up  with 
another  aspect  of  reflex  movement,  i.e.,  the  refractory  phase 
of  muscular  contraction,  the  period  in  which  stimuli  are  with- 
out effect.  In  all  reflexes  which  are  rhythmic  and  not  tonic 
in  their  nature,  the  refractory  period  is  of  importance  for  the 
maintenance  of  the  movement.  "The  reflexes  of  which  the 
refractory  phase  constitutes  a  prominent  feature  are  those 
concerned  with  cyclic  actions  occurring  in  rhythmic  series; 
such  as  the  scratch-reflex,  reflexes  of  swallowing  and  blinking, 
and  probably  the  rhythmically  recurring  reflexes  concerned 
in  the  stepping  of  the  limbs"  (p.  97). 

It  has  been  shown  that  the  maintenance  of  the  organic 
rhythms  over  long  periods  is  due  to  the  refractory  phase  of 
the  muscular  contraction,  and  that  in  voluntary  movements, 
if  a  sufficient  interval  is  allowed  between  the  contractions, 
no  fatigue  is  apparent  (13,  p.  49).  A  similar  phenomenon  is 
observable  in  the  nerve  cell  (p.  139).  There  may  be  a  relation 
between  the  pendulum  rate  of  response  and  the  refractory 
phase  of  the  nerve  cell.  It  is  not,  however,  the  rate  of  the 
nerve  impulse  which  determines  the  rate  of  response,  inasmuch 
as  the  different  organs  are  subject  to  wide  variations  depen- 
dent on  their  structure.  Furthermore,  as  Sherrington  has 
shown,  when  one  group  of  motor  cells,  that  of  the  scratch 
reflex,  is  stimulated  to  produce  a  weak  reflex,  and  another 
distinct  group,  that  of  the  flexors  of  the  hip,  is  then  stimulated 
alternately  with  the  first,  although  the  second  group  can 
respond  to  a  quicker  rhythm  than  that  of  the  first,  neverthe- 
less, the  rhythm  appears  of  greater  amplitude,  but  un- 
quickened  and  unaltered,  without  even  a  break  or  interference 
in  it  (47,  p.  122). 

In  addition,  because  of  the  pendulum  nature  of  the 
response,  increase  in  the  intensity  of  the  stimulus  does  not 
affect  the  rate  of  the  rhythm  or  the  length  of  the  refractory 
phase.  "Increase  of  intensity  of  the  reaction  does  not  show 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE  283 

itself  in  increase  in  frequency  of  the  rhythm  of  the  reflex,  or 
shows  itself  very  slightly  in  that  form,  the  refractory  period 
being  hardly  curtailed  at  all.  The  increase  reveals  itself  as 
greater  amplitude  of  the  individual  beat  of  the  rhythmic 
contraction.  .  .  .  The  beats  in  response  to  a  strong  stimulus 
may  have  six  times  the  amplitude  of  those  evoked  by  a  weak" 

(P-  70. 

The  motor  response  in  rhythm,  since  it  is  also  a  reflex 
response,  and  operates  through  the  same  elements  and  ex- 
ternal factors,  would  tend  to  show  the  same  characteristic 
of  regularity  as  the  rhythmical  reflex.  The  rhythmical  reflex 
may  be  identified  with  the  reflex  response,  with  the  difference 
between  them  that  the  latter  is  simpler  and  uncoordinated 
in  its  character;  for  many  forms  of  stimulation,  as  some 
musical  stimulation,  are  continuous,  yet  give  rise  to  a  reflex 
response,  while,  on  the  other  hand,  the  rhythmical  reflex  is 
not  affected  by  grouped  succession  of  stimuli  (p.  48f.). 

Whether  or  not  identical,  the  same  periodicity  has  been 
found  to  govern  the  reflex  response.  As  in  the  case  of  the 
rhythmical  reflex,  the  basis  of  the  rate  and  its  regularity  is, 
to  a  large  degree,  the  result  of  the  mechanical  factors  involved. 
Among  these,  the  most  important  is  the  length  of  the  member 
and  of  its  parts;  as  in  walking,  the  rate  of  time  varies  inversely 
with  the  length  of  the  limb  (41,  p.  270).  Wundt  speaks  of 
the  principle  of  the  isochronisms  of  like  amplitudes  of  the 
limbs,  and  defines  rhythmical  movements  as  ones  in  which 
the  voluntary  energy  of  the  muscles  is  operative  only  so  far 
as  is  required  to  set  the  limbs  oscillating  in  their  joints  and  to 
maintain  the  movement  (63,  p.  174^)-  Miner  recognized  the 
importance  of  this  factor — "it  must  be  some  structural  ar- 
rangement of  our  body  by  which  a  series  of  like  impressions 
diffusing  to  the  muscles  produces  not  a  separate  wave  for 
each  impulse,  but  a  longer  wave  corresponding  to  a  group  of 
impulses"  (27,  p.  34). 

The  structural  element,  here  likewise,  results  in  a  pendulum 
movement.  Stetson  has  described  the  mechanism  which 
gives  rise  to  the  rate  of  muscular  response  as  a  contraction- 
relaxation  process  working  between  the  positive  and  negative 


284  ELCANON  ISAACS 

muscle-sets  of  the  limb  (52,  p.  268f.).  As  in  the  case  of  the 
pendulum,  the  limb  is  carried  past  the  point  where  the 
generating  force  is  lost  by  momentum  alone  (p.  262).  The 
force  in  the  case  of  the  limb  is  the  contraction  of  the  muscles 
involved.  "Thus  the  limb  is  thrown  back  and  forth,  and 
caught  in  turn  at  the  limits  of  its  movement  by  the  positive 
muscle-sets"  (p.  262). 

It  seems  clear  from  the  governing  effect  of  the  structural 
factors  and  their  relation  to  the  refractory  phase  of  contrac- 
tion, that  the  periodic  reflex  response,  like  the  rhythmical 
reflex,  is  not  coordinated  with  the  objective  stimulation,  but 
is  dependent  on  the  pendulum  rate  of  the  member  of  response. 
This  is  further  indicated  by  the  periodicity  and  constancy  of 
its  character  (p.  263-4),  ^ts  independence  of  the  rate  of 
stimulation  and  of  the  variation  in  the  number  of  stimuli 
(27,  pp.  36—37).  Stetson  found:  "An  obstacle  against  which 
the  limb  strikes  does  not  affect  the  character  of  the  movement; 
at  the  end  of  the  normal  interval  the  negative  muscle-set 
contracts  and  withdraws  the  limb,  as  if  the  limb  had  shot  to 
the  end  of  the  course  unimpeded"  (52,  pp.  263-4). 

The  fact  that  the  basis  of  rhythm  is  motor  response, 
and  that  this  motor  response  is  periodic  in  its  nature,  and 
similar  to  the  pendulum  in  its  movement,  leads  to  the  thesis 
that  rhythm  may  be  defined  as  the  experience  arising  from  the 
periodic,  pendular,  reflex  response  of  characteristic  organs  to 
objective  stimulation. 

This  definition  has  been  the  foundation  of  so  many 
theories  and  systems  that  it  is  difficult  to  see  why  it  has  not 
been  formulated  before.  Each  of  the  various  theories  which 
were  scientific  in  their  nature,  recognized  one  or  more  of  the 
elements,  but  "were  inadequate  because  they  made  the  one 
element  unduly  prominent  because  of  the  type  of  apparatus 
employed,  the  sole  basis.  Bolton  recognized  that  regular 
muscular  response  resulted  from  stimulation,  but  because  of 
the  key-board  arrangement  which  he  used,  thought  it  was 
to  every  stimulus  (3,  p.  235).  Miner  saw  this  was  not  the 
case,  that  these  movements  were  'something  more  than  one 
respnose  to  each  stimulus'  (27,  p.  30),  but  because  he  found 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE  285 

that  a  single  response  took  place  for  a  group  of  stimuli  in  the 
case  of  the  metronome,  assumed  therefore  that  the  muscular 
response  was  the  basis  of  grouping  (p.  12).  Both  are  correct 
in  what  they  saw,  but  neither  explanation  is  the  basis  of 
rhythm.  Stetson  found  that  the  duration  of  the  muscular 
contraction  was  'strikingly  uniform,'  and  'independent  of 
either  the  tempo  of  the  rhythm  or  the  length  of  the  stroke* 
(52,  p.  261),  that  an  obstacle  against  which  the  limb  strikes 
does  not  change  the  normal  interval  or  the  character  of  the 
movement  (p.  263),  but  he  explains  this  on  the  ground  of 
experience.  "It  is  experience  alone  which  teaches  us  to 
guide  the  ballistic  stroke"  (p.  263).  To  Patterson,  'syncopa- 
tion' was  emphasized;  it  is  the  basis  of  his  rhythm — synco- 
pation between  the  objective  stimulation  and  the  'unitary 
pulses  of  subjective  time'  (31,  pp.  4,  67). 

Each  of  these  contains  an  element  of  the  nature  of  rhythm, 
but  each  is  a  theory  of  the  apparatus.  Bolton  used  a  key- 
board arrangement;  Miner  used  a  metronome;  Stetson  used 
a  baton;  Patterson  saw  the  Indians  dance;  and  all  made  the 
peculiarities  which  were  emphasized,  the  basis  of  a  system. 
Only  MacDougall  recognized  that  the  muscular  response  was 
independent  of  the  rate  of  stimulation,  and  yet  not  limited 
to  one  organism  (21,  pp.  466,  474),  but  he  thought  the  recur- 
rent stimulation  exerted  an  inhibitive  influence  'if  its  periodic 
phases  are  in  opposition  to  those  of  the  natural  rhythm  of  the 
sensori-motor  process  itself  (p.  474).  He  also  believed  that 
in  addition  to  the  reflex  response  there  was  a  physiological 
rhythm  'in  the  functioning  of  the  central  nervous  system,' — 
'functional  facilitation  and  reflex  motor  discharge,  I  conceive 
to  be  represented  in  the  conditions  which  support  the  impres- 
sion of  rhythm'  (p.  466).  The  first  factor,  the  possibility  of 
lack  of  coincidence  of  stimulus  and  response,  was  also  recog- 
nized by  Stetson:  "What  happens  when  a  sound  occurs 
out  of  place,  early  in  the  phase  of  relaxation,  or  just  before 
or  just  after  the  climax  of  the  contraction  phase?  Does  it 
make  it  impossible  to  establish  the  coordination,  or  destroy 
it  if  already  established?"  (51,  p.  458). 

It  is  evident  that  at  certain   rates   there  may  be  two 


286  ELCANON  ISAACS 

opposing  tendencies,  that  of  the  periodic,  pendular  response, 
and  that  of  the  rate  of  stimulation.  Weld  found  that  when 
music  seemed  too  fast,  it  was  'too  fast  for  the  particular 
motor  reaction  which  seemed  most  natural  to  the  observer' 
(59,  p.  267).  When  not  of  identical  occurrence,  but  when 
within  favorable  limits,  the  response  may  tend  to  approximate 
the  rate  of  stimulation.  Stevens  found  that  intervals  of  a 
subject  who  beat  time  to  a  metronome,  and  continued  after 
the  metronome  had  stopped,  agreed  only  when  a  particular 
interval  was  used  (53,  p.  401).  Even  here,  however,  there 
may  be  a  gradual  divergence,  which,  when  it  becomes  appre- 
ciable, requires  an  adjustment.  "The  introduction  from 
time  to  time  of  a  single  extra  tap,  with  the  effect  of  transposing 
the  relations  of  the  motor  accompaniment  to  the  phases  of 
the  metronome,  has  been  here  interpreted  as  arising  from  a 
periodically  recurring  adjustment  of  the  reaction  process  to 
the  auditory  series  which  it  accompanies,  and  from  which  it 
has  gradually  diverged"  (22,  p.  338). 

When  there  is  regular  presentation  and  regular  reflex 
response,  if  a  favorable  organ  is  available,  there  will  result  a 
correlation  between  the  response  and  a  certain  number  of 
stimuli.  But  the  relation  may  not  always  be  an  essential 
one,  and  even  Miner,  who  has  made  this  relation  the  basis  of 
his  whole  system,  says,  'the  length  of  the  group  does  not 
increase  proportionately  to  the  number  of  elements  in  it,' 
and  farther  on,  'we  know  that  the  same  individual  varies 
greatly  in  the  length  of  the  group  he  chooses'  (27,  pp.  36-37). 

Due  to  the  many  forms  of  reflex  response,  there  is  no  one 
unit  'to  correlate  all  experience,'  no  one  basic  rate  of  measur- 
ing as  Patterson  has  ascribed  to  the  walking  rate  (31,  p.  64). 
Miner  recognized  that  it  is  misleading  to  claim  there  is  a 
'standard  length  of  group  or  that  the  normal  group  depends 
on  respiration,  fatigue  or  any  particular  physiological  rhythm 
as  determining  its  natural  length'  (27,  p.  39).  The  walking 
rate  which  Patterson  uses  as  the  basic  rate  for  the  whole 
rhythmic  experience,  is  only  one  manifestation  of  the  motor 
response  and  is  dependent  on  the  pendulum  rate  resulting 
from  the  factors  involved  in  walking,  just  as  the  nodding  rate 
is  dependent  on  the  factors  involved  in  moving  the  head. 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPREIENCE  287 

There  is  still  another  characteristic  of  reflex  action  which 
influences  rhythm,  the  after-discharge.  It  is  usually  a  tetanic 
contraction  after  the  cessation  of  stimuli,  and  is  affected  by 
increase  in  the  number  of  stimuli  and  increase  in  the  intensity 
of  the  stimulus  (47,  pp.  28,  30).  The  after-discharge  throws 
some  light  on  the  pause  in  verse.  In  the  rhythmical  unit  in 
verse,  it  has  been  found  that  the  final  element  has  greater 
duration  and  intensity  than  the  other  elements.  Thus  Snell 
records  that  the  word  or  syllable  in  a  verse  immediately 
preceding  a  pause  is  marked  by  greater  duration  and  probably 
intensity  (49,  pp.  39,  47).  The  discharge  of  an  unusually 
strong  impulse  leaves  the  nerve  cell  exhausted  and  a  certain 
time  to  be  recharged  is  required.  So  Stetson  found  that  in 
lyric  verse,  the  verse  pause  was  from  one  fourth  to  one  third 
longer  than  the  foot  pause  (51,  p.  443),  and  that  since  the 
end  of  the  verse  is  the  natural  climactic  position,  rhyme  was 
also  preferable  at  the  close  (p.  429).  Snell  found  that  in 
lyric  verse,  the  end-pause  is  twice  as  long  as  the  internal  pause. 
In  some  verse  rhythm,  the  rhythmic  unit  is  also  dependent 
on  the  summation  of  effect,  when  there  is  not  a  complete 
relaxation  after  each  response  (cf.  infra). 

THE  INITIATION  OF  RHYTHM 

In  the  initiation  of  rhythm,  according  to  Patterson  there 
is  an  adjustment  by  means  of  instinctive  processes  of  the 
elastic  unitary  pulses  and  the  objective  auditory  stimuli, 
sufficient  in  number  to  suggest  serial  grouping  (31,  p.  66). 
Practically  all  other  investigators  consider  the  kinsesthetic 
processes  the  basis  of  the  initiation  of  rhythm.  Ruckmich 
thought  the  kinaesthetic  processes  were  references  for  its 
interpretation  when  it  is  first  heard  (38,  p.  351),  and  that  in 
the  initiation  of  a  difficult  rhythm  they  may  be  even  the  most 
prominent  item  (39,  p.  247). 

The  initiation  of  rhythm  it  is  suggested  presents  the 
following  phenomenon.  Unless  there  is  a  preconceived  pat- 
tern of  response,  stimuli  not  strong  enough  of  themselves  to 
evoke  a  reflex  response  may,  when  repeated,  result  in  a  sum- 
mation of  stimuli  and  produce  contraction.  This  continues 


288  ELCANON  ISAACS 

till  the  pendulum  rate  is  organized,  and  the  adaption  to  the 
refractory  phase  established.  The  organizations  of  most 
poetic  meters  is  on  a  basis  of  the  reflex  pattern.  If,  however, 
irregular  stimulation  in  the  absence  of  a  pattern  of  response 
is  presented,  confusion  results  at  first,  and  until  the  adjustment 
is  made;  or  if  it  is  never  made,  or  if  the  recurrent  stimuli  are 
too  frequent  and  intense,  the  rhythm  is  never  initiated. 

Ruckmich  states:  "Should  the  rhythm  be  more  than 
moderately  difficult,  and  should  it,  therefore,  not  become 
definitely  fixed,  or  should  the  mental  set  of  0  be  such  that 
he  cannot  make  the  rhythm  'fit  in,'  the  pleasant  affection 
may  never  be  reported,  and  strain  sensations  may  continue 
in  a  vague  degree  to  the  end.  .  .  .  Then,  ordinarily,  sensa- 
tions of  strain  gradually  die  away,  attention  drops  in  level, 
kinsesthesis  grows  less  intensive  and  extensive,  and  finally 
vanishes  completely  or  becomes  irrelevant  to  the  rhythm. 
The  rhythm  is  heard  merely  in  terms  of  auditory  perceptions" 
(38,  p.  342).  Scripture  found  that  in  the  beginning  of  an 
experiment  on  a  rhythm  with  a  new  period,  the  subject  is 
quite  at  a  loss  for  a  few  beats  and  can  tap  only  spasmodically 
until  he  obtains  a  'subjective  judgment'  of  the  period  (46, 
pp.  527-8).  Smith  says,  "It  is  doubtful  if  a  rhythm  is  really 
perceived  before  a  certain  degree  of  facility  or  skill  in  the 
movement  is  attained"  (48,  p.  289). 

The  reflex  pattern  may  result  through  the  pendulum  rate 
asserting  itself,  or  through  the  establishment  of  the  latter 
by  presented  schedules  in  its  terms.  Patterson  found  that 
on  the  first  hearing  a  large  number  of  observers  found  all  the 
records  which  he  used  elusive  and  more  or  less  irregular 
(31,  p.  2).  When  organization  through  schedules  was  pre- 
sented, various  degrees  of  satisfaction  were  obtained  (p.  64). 
Even  when  there  is  a  schedule,  however,  confusion  may  result 
when  there  is  a  maladjustment  of  the  pattern  to  the  stimula- 
tion, as  in  an  attempt  to  read  anapaestic  meter  when  the 
motor  response  is  adjusted  to  iambic.  Wallin  found  that 
schematic  arrangement  was  an  aid  to  such  an  extent  as  to 
differentiate  prose  and  poetry  (57,  p.  64). 

The  case  of  involuntary  movement  is  interesting  in  this 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE  289 

connection.  Miyaki  found  that  "arhythmic  movements  have 
a  constant  tendency  to  become  rhythmic,  notwithstanding 
the  voluntary  effort  of  the  subject  to  execute  the  movements 
at  irregular  intervals.  The  subjects  of  the  experiments  in- 
variably agreed  in  confessing  that  the  arhythmic  tapping 
required  strenuous  effort  and  that  the  performance  was  very 
fatiguing"  (28,  p.  4).  Voluntary  irregular  movement  necessi- 
tates a  disturbance  in  the  refractory  phase  involved  and  the 
pendular  aspect  of  movement. 

SYNCOPATION 

The  phenomenon  of  syncopation  to  which  Patterson  has 
drawn  experimental  attention,  "in  itself,  involves  a  complex 
of  mental  processes.  The  most  essential  part  of  the  phe- 
nomenon seems  to  be  that  we  keep  our  impression  of  a  series 
of  subjective  time-intervals,  regular,  accelerating  or  retarding, 
but  find  a  pleasure  in  marking  the  beats  objectively,  either  by 
different  forms  of  motion,  such  as  foot-taps  alternating  with 
hand-taps,  or  by  what  appears  at  first  as  omission  of  objective 
marking  for  certain  beats.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  this  is  usually 
nothing  but  the  interpolation  of  some  concealed  form  of  motor 
reaction  such  as  eye,  throat,  tongue,  or  breath  movement, 
which  alternates  with  a  more  visible  movement,  such  as 
nodding  or  tapping  or  dancing"  (31,  p.  4). 

Stetson  has  described  it  in  much  the  same  terms.  "Along 
with  this  precision  of  all  the  movements  comes  a  tendency  to 
beat  a  new  rhythm.  This  accompanying  rhythm  is  simpler 
and  broader  in  character;  it  is  a  kind  of  long  swell  on  which 
the  speech  movements  ripple.  This  second  rhythm  may 
express  itself  in  a  new  movement  of  hand,  head,  foot  or  body; 
when  it  has  become  more  conscious,  as  in  patting  time  to  a 
dance  or  chant,  it  develops  complicated  forms,  and  a  third 
rhythm  may  appear  beside  it,  to  mark  the  main  stresses  of 
the  two  processes.  The  negro  patting  time  for  a  dance  beats 
the  third  fundamental  rhythm  with  his  foot,  while  his  hands 
pat  an  elaborate  second  rhythm  to  the  primary  rhythm  of  the 
dancers.  .  .  .  This  regulation  of  the  movement  by  the  co- 
incidence of  several  rhythms  is  the  cause  of  the  striking 
regularity  of  the  temporal  relations"  (51,  pp.  465-6). 


290  ELCANON  ISAACS 

In  Patterson's  definition  (31,  p.  4),  syncopation  is  appar- 
ently manifested  by  the  performer  of  the  rhythm.  Syncopa- 
tion is  used  by  Patterson  in  three  senses,  (i)  as  any  full  motor 
response  (p.  xix),  (2)  motor  response  in  the  performer  of  the 
rhythm  (p.  4),  (3)  a  correlation  of  the  'unitary  pulses'  and 
objective  stimulation  in  the  observer  (p.  91).  This  analysis 
has  shown  that  while  there  is  coexistence,  there  is  not  neces- 
sarily correlation  and  rarely  coincidence  of  the  objective 
stimulation  and  the  reflex  response.  Syncopation  in  the 
third  sense  exists,  but  it  is  limited  to  a  comparatively  small 
field  of  rhythm. 

Full  motor  response  is  not  so  evident  in  modern  rhythm. 
As  Patterson  says,  "Modern  sophistication  has  inhibited 
many  native  instincts,  and  the  mere  fact  that  our  conventional 
dignity  usually  forbids  us  to  sway  our  bodies  or  to  tap  our 
feet  when  we  hear  effective  music,  has  deprived  us  of  un- 
suspected pleasures"  (p.  xix).  Patterson  concludes:  "What 
is  left,  then,  but  to  conclude  that  the  sentence  which  has  in 
its  structure  the  possibility  of  a  maximum  of  rhythm  must 
be  capable  of  evoking  in  us  a  maximum  of  motor  response? 
To  test  it,  therefore,  we  must  tap  to  it,  nod  to  it,  walk  to  it, 
sway  to  it,  chop  wood  to  it,  if  necessary.  .  .  .  If  it  is  easy  for 
us  to  nod  or  tap,  or,  for  that  matter,  hoe  potatoes  to  these 
salient  'drum-songs'  .  .  .  the  first  degree  of  rhythmic  excel- 
lence is  obtained"  (p.  15). 

The  contortions  of  the  polar  bear  which  Patterson  has 
called  'prose'  merely  present  syncopation  of  the  muscular 
responses  of  various  organs  due  to  the  pendulum  rates  of  the 
organs.  They  are  not,  however,  'harmoniously  but  intri- 
cately regulated  by  the  incessant  unitary  "flap!  flap!  flap!" 
of  those  great  white  feet'  (32,  p.  261).  Each  is  as  independent 
in  its  own  sphere  as  the  walking  movement  is  in  its  sphere. 
The  large  body  of  literature  on  rhythm,  then,  is  not  invali- 
dated by  the  'new  standard.'  On  the  contrary,  it  is  enriched 
by  the  hitherto  experimentally  unrecognized  field  of  syncopa- 
tion. 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE  291 

THE  FACTORS  OF  ATTENTION 

Although  rhythm  is  intimately  bound  up  with  attention, 
the  unsatisfactory  state  of  knowledge  about  the  latter  pre- 
vents a  wholly  satisfactory  correlation  of  the  two.  Ruckmich 
says  that  during  the  rhythm  experience  attention  is  at  a 
high  level  (38,  p.  342),  and  he  believes  that  there  is  a  typical 
rhythmical  consciousness  (p.  341).  Bolton  ascribes  grouping 
and  accentuation  to  a  'sequence  of  acts  of  attention'  (3, 
p.  21 1),  and  with  this  position  there  is  substantial  agreement. 
Squire  says:  "One  group  corresponds  to  one  pulse  of  atten- 
tion, and  the  regularity  of  the  subjective  rhythm  is  due  to  the 
regularity  with  which  the  pulses  of  attention  succeed  one 
another"  (50,  p.  575).  MacDougall  posits  a  kinaesthetic  level 
due  to  changes  in  attention,  'those  elements  which  are  em- 
phasized being  likewise  more  clearly  attended  to'  (21,  p.  468). 
Meumann  says  that  rhythm  may  be  regarded  as  an  unlike 
energy  division  of  the  attention,  an  alternation  of  attending 
and  not  attending  (25,  p.  304).  Arps  and  Klemm  found  that 
the  greatest  degree  of  attention  occurs  at  the  accented  sound 
and  the  least  at  the  second  unaccented  sound  (2,  p.  5181.). 
Rhythm  was  at  one  time  thought  to  be  solely  a  matter  of 
attention  (35,  p.  164;  Cf.  34,  p.  330). 

In  repeated  stimulation  resulting  in  rhythm,  it  is  clear 
that  there  are  two  kinds  of  presentation,  regular  and  ir- 
regular. There  is  no  essential  difference  between  them  from 
the  point  of  view  of  rhythm,  other  than  that  of  degree. 
There  are,  however,  two  classes  of  stimulation  which  are 
different  in  their  nature,  that  objectively  accented  and  pos- 
sibly grouped,  and  that  undifferentiated.  An  example  of 
the  first  class  is  most  poetry  or  music;  an  example  of  the 
second  class  is  the  ticking  of  the  metronome  or  the  puffs 
of  a  locomotive.  Neither  grouping  nor  accent,  however,  are 
necessarily  a  part  either  of  the  objective  stimulation  or  of 
the  periodic  response.1  Neither  are  present  in  organic  rhythm 
nor  at  certain  rates  in  presented  rhythm.  It  is  evident  that 

1  Cf.  Patterson,  op.  cit.,  p.  4  (31). 
Squire,  op.  cit.,  p.  540  (50). 

.Wallin,  'Experimental  Studies  of  Rhyrthm  and  Time,'  PSY.  REV.,  XIX.,  1912, 
P-  297  (58). 


292  ELCANON  ISAACS 

they  do  not  cause  nor  are  they  the  result  of  the  periodic 
response.  Grouping  and  accentuation,  it  is  suggested,  are 
the  result  of  the  organic  rhythm  to  which  attention  itself  is 
subject  (V.  33,  p.  70).  Wundt  in  speaking  of  the  periodic  rise 
and  fall  of  attention  says  it  may  become  regular  in  its  periods 
when  there  are  special  considerations  favoring  rhythmical 
succession  (63,  p.  255).  Titchener  says:  "As  for  the  effect 
of  the  anticipatory  image,  it  is  clear  that,  the  more  nearly 
the  excitation  correlated  with  the  given  stimulus  coincides 
with  a  psychophysical  excitation  already  in  progress,  the  more 
easily  will  it  make  its  way  within  the  nervous  system  and  the 
more  dominant  will  it  become"  (55,  p.  205). 

The  results  of  attention  also  appear  with  undifferentiated 
stimulation  and  give  rise  to  accentuation  and  grouping.  It 
is  in  the  case  of  undifferentiated  stimulation  that  the  verifica- 
tion of  the  suggestion  must  be  found.  "It  is  the  fact  of 
periodical  differentiation,  not  its  particular  direction,  which 
is  important.  Further,  as  we  know,  when  such  types  of 
variation  are  wholly  absent  in  the  series,  certain  elements 
may  receive  periodical  accentuation  in  dependence  on  phases 
of  the  attention  process  itself,  and  a  subjective  but  perfectly 
real  and  adequate  rhythm  arise"  (22,  p.  320). 

The  operation  of  rhythm  can  be  thought  of  as,  on  one 
part,  objective  stimulation,  regular  or  irregular;  on  the  other 
part,  regular  serial  reflex  response.  Bridging  the  two  is 
attention,  which  acts  in  its  own  way.  Rhythm  arises  from 
the  reflex  response;  accent  and  grouping  are  the  result  of 
attention. 

Supplementary  evidence  that  this  is  the  case  is  furnished 
by  the  illusions  of  the  durations  of  the  undifferentiated 
member  and  its  contiguous  intervals.  "The  effect  of  both 
intensity  and  duration  in  rhythm  may  be  generalized  as 
follows.  If  every  second  or  third  sound  is  made  more  intense 
or  is  made  shorter,  the  effect  on  grouping  is  the  same  as  if 
the  interval  immediately  preceding  that  sound  were  increased 
relative  to  the  other  intervals.  The  effect  of  the  more  intense 
sound,  when  all  the  sounds  are  of  equal  duration,  or  of  the 
shorter  sound  when  all  the  sounds  are  of  equal  intensity,  is  a 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE      2 93 

V 

relative  overestlmation  of  the  interval  preceding  the  more 
intense  or  the  shorter  sound"  (60,  p.  66). 

Ruckmich,  following  Miner,  lays  great  stress  on  kinaesthesis 
as  the  basis  of  grouping  and  accentuation.  He  says,  "Three 
points  are  certainly  clear:  (i)  the  kinaesthetic  complex 
changes  for  accent  and  non-accent,  (2)  kinaesthesis  on  the 
accent  is  more  intensive  and  is  felt  as  strain  or  tension,  while 
kinaesthesis  on  the  non-accent  is  less  intensive  and  is  felt  as 
relaxation,  and  (3)  kinaesthesis,  prominent  as  it  is,  may  be 
temporarily  or  entirely  replaced  by  visual  or  auditory  com- 
plexes" (38,  p.  336).  "To  the  writer  the  group  appears 
to  be  a  complex  of  perceptions  organized  in  terms  of  imaginal 
and  kinaesthetic  processes  on  the  basis  of  affectively  toned 
organic  processes"  (39,  p.  254).  MacDougall,  however, 
places  the  kinaesthesis  of  attention  on  a  different  level  than 
that  of  the  motor  accompaniment  although  he  says  it  is 
concomitant  with  the  sensory  series  (21,  p.  467).  The  ques- 
tion arises  whether  this  particular  kinaesthesis  of  strain  or 
tension  is  not  of  this  nature  and  dependent  on  attention 
(cf.  3,  p.  21 1). 

POETIC  RHYTHM 

A  word  may  here  be  said  on  the  rhythm  of  poetry.  The 
rhythmic  experience  arising  from  poetry  is  more  satisfactory 
than  that  of  prose  although  Patterson  would  consider  it  of  an 
inferior  order.  "The  aggressive  'timer,'  of  course,  gets  his 
keenest  delight  from  prose  in  the  fact  that  he  feels  no 
trammels"  (31,  p.  84;  cf.  21,  p.  478).  That  this  is  not  the 
verdict  of  experience  is  shown  by  the  fact  that  all  peoples  in 
all  times  have  chosen  poetry  as  a  vehicle  to  express  their  most 
satisfactory  experiences.  In  poetic  rhythm,  there  is  the  possi- 
bility of  greater  correlation  between  the  regularity  of  the 
periodic  response  and  of  the  occurrence  of  the  objective 
stimuli.  This  does  not  mean,  however,  that  they  are  co- 
incident. Patterson  says  that  poetry  is  the  result  of  co- 
incidence of  the  unitary  pulses  and  the  accented  syllables 
(31,  p.  91).  Considering  the  unitary  pulses  as  equivalent 
to  one  form  of  response,  this  may  be  true  for  a  limited  body  of 
poetry,  but  it  would  be  at  the  sacrifice  of  attention  and 


294  ELCANON  ISAACS 

interest.  According  to  Weld,  movement  is  not  unison  with 
the  Takt,  but  is  in  accordance  with  the  musical  phrase  (59, 
p.  266). 

At  the  same  time  the  methods  of  the  'stresser'  and  all 
schematic  classical  systems  of  scansion  which  Patterson  so 
greatly  condemns  (31,  p.  83),  have  been  of  use  and  still  are 
in  classifying  certain  forms  of  poetry.  The  unfortunate  result 
of  their  use  was  to  render  difficult  of  analysis  the  nature  of 
poetries,  in  which  the  motor  response  is  not  so  nearly  cor- 
related with  the  objective  stimulation.  For  this  reason,  the 
nature  of  biblical  meter  was  obscured  for  nearly  twenty 
centuries  although  scholars  had  worked  on  it  steadily  during 
that  time.  Its  nature  recently  indicated  (14,  p.  20),  shows 
as  close  an  approximation  to  the  motor  rhythm  of  other 
poetries,  but  not  through  stereotyped  metric  forms.  The 
motor  response  arises  in  connection  with  the  normal  unit 
for  recitative.  Its  basis  is  the  'word-foot,'  so  that  there  is  an 
identification  between  the  word  and  the  unit  of  response 
(p.  41).  This  is  possible  through  the  similar  lengths  of  the 
words  (p.  41).  The  rhythmic  unit  corresponding  to  the  verse, 
however,  is  of  definite  and  invariable  lengths,  consisting  of 
three  units  and,  in  a  certain  form  of  poetry,  of  two  units 
(p.  44).  Furthermore,  owing  to  the  intense  form  of  the 
poetry,  there  was  not  a  relaxation  after  each  response, 
but  a  simple  and  clear  case  of  summation  of  effects  resulted, 
which  gave  rise  to  the  parallelistic  structure  (15,  p.  114). 

In  the  adult  reading  of  the  modern  verse,  the  characteristic 
reflex  response  seems  also  to  be  in  relation  to  the  point  of 
maximum  emphasis  rather  than  in  any  indispensable  relation 
to  the  uniform  metrical  foot.  It  is  dependent  on  the  form 
of  reflex  response.  Brown  found  that  the  verse  in  English 
poetry  seems  to  be  divided  into  short  phrases  which  are  fairly 
uniform  in  their  length  while  the  feet  are  not  (4,  p.  51). 

ELEMENTS  OF  THE  DEFINITION  OF  RHYTHM 

(a)  AFFECTIVE  TONE 

Whether  affective  tone  should  be  included  in  the  definition 
of  rhythm  has  been  put  in  issue  between  the  extremes  of  Smith 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE  «95 

who  says  that  rhythm  no  longer  exists  when  affective  tone 
becomes  unpleasant  (48,  p.  287),  to  Squire  who  says  that 
feeling  is  not  essential  to  the  perception  of  rhythm  (50,  p.  587). 
There  are  many  intermediate  views,  and  some  that  cannot  be 
placed  at  all.  Wundt  defines  rhythm  as  an  emotion  arising 
from  the  feelings  of  expectation  and  satisfaction  (61,  p.  311; 
63,  p.  200),  and  says  the  pleasantness  of  rhythm  depends  on 
the  repetition  of  feelings  of  tension  and  the  contrast  between 
feelings  of  tension  and  relaxation  (64,  p.  is8f.).  Meumann 
says  that  the  affective  tone  of  rhythm  depends  on  the  mood 
of  a  given  time  (25,  p.  266),  and  according  to  Smith,  although 
she  gives  no  citation,  defines  rhythm  as  an  emotion  dis- 
charging itself  in  ordered  movements  (48,  p.  292).  Ebhardt 
places  the  main  stress  on  affective  tone  and  makes  it  the 
sine  qua  non  of  rhythm  (9,  p.  127).  Ruckmich  says  rhythm 
may  change  from  slight  unpleasantness  before  it  is  grasped, 
through  pleasantness  when  it  is  thoroughly  perceived,  to 
unpleasantness  when  it  continues  without  change  (38,  p.  359). 

Throughout  these  theories  there  runs  an  unconscious  dis- 
tinction between  affective  tone  as  a  result  of  the  rhythmic 
experience  and  affective  tone  as  an  element  of  it.  If  the 
latter  is  true,  then  the  statement  that  'there  is  no  poor 
rhythm'  (48,  p.  292)  is  correct.  The  weight  of  the  evidence, 
however,  is  against  this.  Rhythm  may  be  unpleasant;  at 
times  it  may  be  'dreadful'  (3,  p.  221;  48,  p.  285). 

Affective  tone  is  the  result  of  rhythm,  but  since  rhythm  is 
a  continuing  phenomenon,  the  affective  tone  aroused  by  the 
feelings  of  repeated,  perfected  movement,  has  been  thought 
to  be  the  cause  of  the  rhythm  coming.  Squire  says:  "The 
affective  tone  increases  in  proportion  as  the  summation  of 
excitation  increases,  till  a  state  bordering  on  ecstasy  may  be 
reached.  Ecstasy,  when  it  follows  upon  rhythmical  stimula- 
tion, is  due  to  a  spreading  of  the  excitations  to  a  greater  and 
greater  number  of  centers,  till  the  body  and  the  whole  of 
consciousness  are  set  in  co-vibration"  (50,  p.  588). 

(&)  COMPLEXITY 

Every  investigator  whether  or  not  he  includes  affective 
tone  is  his  defiiaition  of  rhythm  is  very  certain  and  unequivocal 


296  ELCANON  ISAACS 

as  to  its  complexity.  This  is  practically  the  only  point  that 
all  are  agreed  upon.  Thus  Meumann  says:  "The  error  must 
be  emphatically  combated,  that  on  defining  any  one  of  these 
elements,  even  of  the  so-called  equality  of  the  beats,  we  have 
defined  the  nature  of  the  rhythm,"  but  enumerates  the  various 
factors  which  are  necessary  for  the  experience  of  rhythm. 
"In  this  manner,  in  the  rhythmical  impression  we  shall  have 
to  seek  for  the  elements  of  time,  accent  and  pitch.  By  the 
side  of  these  there  must  be  distinguished  a  number  of  higher 
intellectual  factors,  whose  operations  we  must  seek  in  the 
inner  comprehension,  in  the  additions  of  subjective  accent, 
in  the  strain  and  relaxing  of  the  attention,  the  relating  of  the 
rhythmical  groups  to  one  another,  their  perception  as  repeti- 
tion of  the  preceding  and  preparation  for  the  following  im- 
pressions" (25,  pp.  305-6).  So  Wundt  (62,  pt.  2,  I,  p.  3761.); 
and  Ruckmich  says,  "...  the  rhythmical  perception  is  an  ex- 
ceedingly complex  affair.  .  .  .  The  grouping  effect  of  a 
rhythm  in  any  case  may  depend  on  visual  patterns,  on  audi- 
tory imagery,  on  organic  complexes,  on  changes  of  clearness, 
on  alterations  of  temporal  arrangements,  on  verbal  ideas,  on 
motor  responses,  and  on  many  similar  items"  (39,  p.  247). 

Likewise  Patterson  is  careful  to  point  out  this  item  of  the 
experience.  "Rhythmic  experience  may  thus  be  roughly 
described  as  a  complex  of  perception,  emotion,  and  sensation, 
with  all  three  elements  subjected  to  the  moulding  processes  of 
attention,  both  voluntary  and  involuntary"  (31,  p.  91). 
There  is  ample  complexity  here,  yet  elsewhere  he  says,  "The 
final  impression  of  rhythm  derived  from  a  sentence  is,  to  a 
large  extent,  a  fusion  of  elements,  in  which  actual  pitch,  tone- 
color,  thought,  mood,  capricious  or  logical  attention,  etc., 
enter  as  factors  in  addition  to  duration,  stress,  and  the  dim 
elements  of  pitch,  actual  or  purely  subjective,  implicated 
in  the  drum-beat  tune"  (p.  70). 

SUMMARY 

Rhythm  is  the  experience  arising  from  the  periodic, 
pendular,  reflex  response  of  characteristic  organs  to  objective 
stimulation.  There  are  four  elements  in  the  impression  of 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE  *97 

rhythm,  the  perception  of  the  objective  stimulation,  the 
experience  of  the  periodic  reflex  response,  accentuation  and 
grouping  resulting  from  attention,  and  the  affective  tone 
arising  from  repetition  of  movement. 

The  pendulum  rate  is  the  rate  at  which  an  organ  vibrates 
in  the  absence  of  voluntary  factors,  and  is  the  result  of  the 
length  of  attachment  of  a  member,  and  of  the  refractory 
phase  of  the  muscles  involved. 

The  reflex  response  is  the  result  of,  but  independent  of  the 
stimulation,  and  depends  on  the  pendulum  rate  of  the  member 
responding.  Because  of  the  periodic  nature  of  the  reflex 
response,  regularity  was  read  into  the  objective  stimulation, 
and  it  was  thought  that  the  latter  must  be  chronometrically 
proportionate.  This  belief  gave  rise  to  elaborate  and  some- 
times artificial  systems  of  meter,  and  prosody  was  erected 
into  a  science. 

The  objective  stimulation  has  one  prerequisite,  that  the 
discrete  stimuli  recur  so  as  to  give  rise  to  a  serial  response. 
With  this  qualification,  the  stimulation  may  be  regular  or 
irregular,  accented  or  unaccented,  grouped  or  ungrouped. 

BIBLIOGRAPHY 

1.  ALDEN,  R.  M.     An  Introduction  to  Poetry.     1909. 

2.  ARPS,  C.  F.  AND  KLEMM,  O.     Der  Verlauf  der  Aufmerksamkeit  bei  rhythmischen 

Reizen.     Psychologische  Studien,  1909,  4. 

3.  BOLTON,  T.  L.     Rhythm.    Amer,  J.  Psychol.,  VI.,  1894. 

4.  BROWN,  WARNER.    Time  in  English  Verse  Rhythm.    Arch,  of  Psychol.,  No.  10, 

1908. 

5.  BRUCKE,  E.  W.     Die  physiologischen  Grundlagen  der  neuhochdeutschen  Verskunst. 

1871. 

6.  DUNLAP,  KNIGHT.     Rhythm  and  the  Specious  Present.    /.  Phil.,  Psychol.  and 

Sci.  Mtth.,  1911,  8. 

7.  DUNLAP,  KNIGHT.     Time  and  Rhythm.    Psy.  Bull.,  1916,  13. 

8.  EBBINGHAUS,  H.     Grundzuge  der  Psychologic.     1902. 

9.  EBHARDT,  KURT.     Zwei  Beitrage  zur  Psychologic  des  Rhythmus  und  des  Tempo. 

Zeit.  fur  Psychol.,  1898,  18. 

10.  GUEST,  EDWIN.    A  History  of  English  Versification.     1882. . 

11.  GUMMERE,  F.  B.    A  Handbook  of  Poetics.     1885. 

12.  GURNEY,  EDMUND.    The  Power  of  Sound.     1880. 

13.  HOWELL,  W.  H.    A  Text-book  of  Physiology.     1917. 

14.  ISAACS,  ELCANON.    The  Metrical  Basis  of  Hebrew  Poetry.     Amer.  J.  Sem.  Lang., 

1918,  35- 

15.  ISAACS,  ELCANON.    The  Origin  and  Nature  of  Parallelism.     Amer.  J.  Sem.  Lang., 

1919,  35- 


ELCANON  ISAACS 

16.  KOFFKA,  K.    Experimental-Untersuchungen  zur  Lehre  vom  Rhythmus.    Zeit. 

fur  Psychol.,  1909,  52. 

17.  KOSTLIN,  K.    Aesthetik,  1869. 

18.  KULPE,  O.    Outlines  of  Psychology,  trans.  E.  B.  Titchener. 

19.  LANIER,  SIDNEY.    The  Science  of  English  Verse.     1880. 

20.  LOBE,  J.  C.     Katechismus  der  Musik,  25  Aufl.     1893. 

21.  MACDOUGALL,  ROBERT.    The  Relation  of  Auditory  Rhythm  to  Nervous  Dis- 

charge.   PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1902,  9. 

22.  MACDOUGALL,  ROBERT.    The  Structure  of  Simple  Rhythm  Forms.    Han.  Psy. 

Stud.,  i,  1903;  PSY.  REV.  MONOG.,  4,  1903. 

23.  MATTHEWS,  J.  BRANDER.    A  Study  of  Versification.     1911. 

24.  MAYOR,  J.  B.     Chapters  on  English  Meter.     1901. 

25.  MEUMANN,  ERNST.    Untersuchungen  zur  Psychologic  und  Aesthetik  des  Rhyth- 

mus.   Phil.  Stud.,  1894,  10. 

26.  MEYER,  E.  B.    Beitrage  zur  deutschen  Metrik.    Die  neuere  Sprachen,  VI,  1896. 

27.  MINER,  J.   B.    Motor,   Visual   and  Applied   Rhythms.     PSY.    REV.  MONOG., 

1903,  5- 

28.  MIYAKI,  ISHIRO.     Researches  on  Rhythmic  Action.     Yale  Psy.  Stud.,  1901,  9. 

29.  MYERS,  C.  S.    A  Text-book  of  Experimental  Psychology.     1911. 

30.  OMOND,  T.  S.    A  Study  of  Meter.     1903. 

31.  PATTERSON,  W.  M.    The  Rhythm  of  Prose,  1916.     2d  ed.     1917. 

32.  PATTERSON,  W.  M.    New  Verse  and  New  Prose.    North  Amer.  Rev.,  1918,  207. 

33.  PILLSBURY,  W.  B.    Attention.     1908. 

34.  PILLSBURY,  W.  B.    The  Fundamentals  of  Psychology.     1916. 

35.  PUFFER,  E.  D.    The  Psychology  of  Beauty.     1905. 

36.  RIEMANN,  H.     Katechismus  der  Musik.     1888. 

37.  RIEMANN,  H.     Elemente  der  musikalischen  Aesthetik.     1900. 

38.  RUCKMICH,  C.  A.     The  Role  of  Kinaesthesis  in  the  Perception  of  Rhythm.     Amer. 

J.  Psychol.,  1913,  24. 

39.  RUCKMICH,  C.  A.    Visual  Rhythm.    Titchener  Commemorative  Volume.     1917. 

40.  SAINTSBURY,  G.    Historical  Manual  of  English  Prosody.     1910. 

41.  SCHAFER,  A.  E.    A  Text-book  of  Physiology,  II.     1900. 

42.  SCHIPPER,  J.     History  of  English  Versification.     1910. 

43.  SCRIPTURE,  E.  W.    The  Law  of  Rhythmic  Movement.     Science,  n.s.,  1896,  4. 

44.  SCRIPTURE,  E.  W.    The  New  Psychology.     1899. 

45.  SCRIPTURE,  E.  W.    Observations  on  Rhythmic  Action.     Yale  Psy.  Stud.,  1899,7. 

46.  SCRIPTURE,  E.  W.     Elements  of  Experimental  Phonetics.     1902. 

47.  SHERRINGTON,  C.  S.    The  Integrative  Action  of  the  Nervous  System.     1906. 

48.  SMITH,  M.  K.    Rhythmus  und  Arbeit.     Phil.  Stud.,  1900,  16. 

49.  SNELL,  A.  L.  F.    Pause;  a  Study  of  its  Nature  and  its  Rhythmical  Function  in 

Verse,  Especially  Blank  Verse.    Univ.  of  Michigan  Contributions  to  Rhetorical 
Theory.     1918. 

50.  SQUIRE,  C.  R.    A  Genetic  Study  of  Rhythm.    Amer.  J.  Psychol,  1901,  12. 

51.  STETSON,  R.  H.    Rhythm  and  Rhyme.     Harv.  Psy.  Stud.,  1903,  i;    PSY.  REV. 

MONOG.,  1903,  4. 

52.  STETSON,  R.  H.    A  Motor  Theory  of  Rhythm  and  Discrete  Succession.    PSYCHOL. 

REV.,  1905,  12. 

53.  STEVENS,  L.  F.    On  the  Time-sense.    Mind,  1886,  n. 

54.  SULLY,  JAMES.    The  Human  Mind.     1892. 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  RHYTHM  EXPERIENCE 


299 


55.  TITCHENER,  E.  B.    The  Psychology  of  Feeling  and  Attention.     1908. 

56.  TITCHENER,  E.  B.    A  Text-book  of  Psychology.     1919. 

57.  WALLIN,  J.  E.  W.    Researches  on  the  Rhythm  of  Speech.     Yale  Psy.  Styd.,  1901, 9. 

58.  WALLIN,  J.  E.  W.    Experimental  Studies  of  Rhythm  and  Time.    PSYCHOL.  REV., 

1912,  19. 

59.  WELD,  H.  P.    An  Experimental  Study  of  Musical  Enjoyment.    Amer.  J.  Psychol., 

1912,  23. 

60.  WOODROW,  H.    A  Quantitative  Study  of  Rhythm.    Arch,  of  Psychol.,  No.  14, 

1909. 

61.  WUNDT,  W.    Vorlesungen  uber  der  Menschen-  und  Thier-seele.     1897. 

62.  WUNDT,  W.    Volkerpsychologie.     1900. 

63.  WUNDT,  W.    Grundriss  der  Psychologic.     1901. 

64.  WUNDT,  W.    Grundzuge  der  physiologischen  Psychologic,  III.     1903. 


BY  GODFREY  H.  THOMSON,  D.Sc. 
Armstrong  College,  University  of  Durham 

I.   INTRODUCTION 

I  propose  in  this  paper  to  examine  some  of  the  ideas  under- 
lying the  interpretations  hitherto  given  of  threshold  measure- 
ments, and  in  particular  (a)  the  measure  used  in  comparing 
the  sensitivity  of  one  individual  with  that  of  another,  (b)  the 
measure  of  sensitivity  used  in  testing  Weber's  Law,  (c)  the 
origin  of  this  law,  whether  it  be  psychological  or  physiological, 
(d)  the  Idea  of  a  psychometric  function,  and  (e)  the  notion 
of  the  probability  of  a  judgment.  These  points  cannot  be 
treated  separately,  but  must  be  considered  in  conjunction 
with  one  another.  The  ideas  which  I  wish  to  express  have 
their  origin,  however,  chiefly  in  an  extension  of  the  last- 
mentioned  point. 

II.   THE  DIFFERENCE  THRESHOLD 

To  fix  ideas,  I  shall  discuss  difference  thresholds  only, 
leaving  the  question  of  absolute  thresholds  aside.  Further, 
I  shall  use  the  case  of  experiments  on  lifted  weights,  by  the 
Method  of  Right  and  Wrong  Cases.1  In  this  form  of  experi- 
ment, comparison  weights  are  contrasted  frequently,  one  by 
one,  by  lifting  them  in  a  specified  way,  with  a  standard 
weight,  and  on  each  is  expressed  a  judgment  lighter,  undecided, 
or  heavier.  When  a  sufficient  number  of  judgments  have  been 
collected,  the  tliree  categories  are  found  to  occur  with  varying 
frequency  with  different  comparison  weights,  and  curves 
similar  to  those  shown  in  the  accompanying  diagram  can 
be  constructed.2 

1  Otherwise  termed  the  Method  of  Constant  Stimuli,  and  the  Methode  der  drei 
Hauptfalle. 

2  For  fuller  details  of  the  determination  of  this  and  other  thresholds,  and  for 
references  to  experimental  memoirs,  the  reader  may  consult  G.  T.  Fechner,  Elemente 

300 


INTERPRETATION  OF  THRESHOLD  MEASUREMENTS         3OX 

In  this  diagram  the  points  marked  on  the  #-axis  represent 
the  comparison  weights.  The  height  AB  represents  unity, 
and  the  three  curves  give  the  proportional  frequency  of 
answers  lighter,  undecided  and  heavier  respectively,  the  un- 
decided curve  being  a  bell-shaped  curve,  and  the  other  two 
being  what  Galton  termed  ogives.*  The  difference  threshold 

B 


A  7 


FIG.  i 


is  then  decided  by  the  positions  of  the  points  S  and  S'  where 
the  lighter  and  heavier  curves  cross  the  halfway  line.2  The 
distance  (S  —  S')/2  or  some  closely  similar  quantity  is  what 
is  called  the  difference  threshold,  and  this  quantity  is  com- 
monly used  in  comparing  the  sensitivity  of  different  subjects. 
The  smaller  (S  —  S'),  the  more  sensitive  the  subject  is  said 
to  be. 

This  distance  however  depends  entirely  on  the  subject's 

der  Psychophysik,  1869;  G.  E.  Mueller,  Die  Gesichtspunkte  und  die  Thatsachen  der 
psychophysischen  Methodik,  Wiesbaden,  1904;  W.  Wirth,  Psychophysik,  Leipzig, 
1912;  and  F.  M.  Urban,  The  Application  of  Statistical  Methods  to  the  Problems  of 
Psychophysics,  Philadelphia,  1908. 

1  The  actual  experiments  of  course  do  not  give  curves  but  only  points  through  or 
among  which  the  curves  are  then  drawn  smoothly,  either  by  hand,  by  a  flexible  ruler, 
or  by  assuming  mathematical  equations  for  the  curves.  In  the  latter  case  if  the 
equations  contain  sufficient  constants,  the  curves  can  be  made  to  go  exactly  through 
the  points;  otherwise  the  best  fitting  curves  are  drawn  by  some  method  such  as  the 
method  of  least  squares  or  the  method  of  moments. 

*  These  points  on  an  ogive  are  analogous  to  the  medians  of  bell  curves.  Some 
experimenters,  instead  of  calculating  these  medians,  calculate  points  analogous  to 
means.  These  differ  slightly  from  S  and  S'  but  these  differences  have  no  bearing  on 
our  present  argument.  Questions  of  space  and  time  errors  also*  arise. 


302 


GODFREY  H.   THOMSON 


readiness  to  give  the  answer  undecided.  It  measures  there- 
fore rather  a  moral  characteristic  than  a  physical  sensitivity. 
It  is  a  question  of  quickness  of  decision  on  small  evidence 
just  as  much  as  a  question  of  difference  of  amount  of  evidence. 
If  persons  A  and  B  differ  widely  in  the  number  of  undecided 
answers  which  they  give,  it  may  just  as  well  be  their  habits 
of  forming  decisions  which  differ,  and  not  their  power  of 
actually  discriminating  the  weights.  The  moral  character 
of  the  measure  S  —  Sf  is  above  all  seen  from  the  fact  that  any 
subject  who  wishes  may  reduce  it  to  zero,  whatever  may  be 
his  actual  sensitivity,  simply  by  determining  that  he  will 
never  give  an  answer  undecided.  Difference  thresholds  there- 
fore are  unsuitable  for  comparing  the  sensitivity  of  different 
subjects. 

III.   THE  INTERQUARTILE  RANGE  OF  THE  POINT  OF 
SUBJECTIVE  EQUALITY 

There  is  however  another  measure  which  has  been  used 
for  this  purpose.  This  can  be  most  conveniently  described 
by  considering  first  a  case  in  which  a  subject  gives  no  un- 


0.75 


0.60 


0.25 


— , »•  STIMULUS 

FIG.  2 

decided  answers.  In  such  a  case  the  central  curve  of  the 
former  diagram,  that  is  the  bell-shaped  curve,  disappears, 
and  only  the  two  ogives  are  left,  as  in  the  accompanying  Fig.  2. 
The  thresholds  S  and  S'  have  come  together  and  on  the 
previous  plan  the  subject's  sensitivity  would  be  considered 


INTERPRETATION  OF  THRESHOLD  MEASUREMENTS         3°3 

infinite,  and  all  subjects  giving  no  undecided  answers  would 
be  given  the  same  infinite  sensitivity,  whereas  clearly  the 
subject's  sensitivity  is  connected  with  the  rapidity  with  which 
the  curves  pass  from  zero  to  unity  or  vice  versa,  and  two 
subjects  may  differ  very  much  in  this  respect  even  although 
they  may  both  give  no  undecided  answers.  Under  these 
circumstances  a  measure  which  has  been  used  is  the  distance 
Q  —  Q'  which  is  sufficiently  explained  by  the  diagram.  This 
measure  (though  in  another  guise)  was  used  by  Fechner  also 
for  the  cases  where  undecided  answers  were  given.  In  such 
cases  he  reduced  the  three  curves  to  two  by  sharing  the 
undecided  answers  equally  between  heavier  and  lighter.  This 
measure  has  the  advantage  that  the  subject  cannot  increase 
his  apparent  sensitivity  at  will,  as  was  the  case  with  the 
threshold  measure.  Q  —  Q'  is  the  interquartile  range  of  a 
hypothetical  point  of  subjective  equality.  It  and  the  differ- 
ence threshold  measure  distinctly  different  things  and  subjects 
placed  in  order  of  merit  by  the  one  will  be  found  in  a  different 
order  when  graded  by  the  other.  The  measure  Q  —  Q'  is 
more  physiological  than  the  threshold  measure. 

IV.   WEBER'S  LAW 

Although  these  two  measures,  the  difference  threshold 
and  the  interquartile  range  of  the  point  of  equality,  measure 
different  things  and  give  quite  different  results  when  we  are 
comparing  separate  subjects,  yet  in  one  and  the  same  subject 
each  of  them  obeys  Weber's  Law  in  so  far  as  that  law  is 
obeyed  by  any  measure.  It  would  appear  that  some  light 
might  be  thrown  on  the  question  whether  Weber's  Law  is 
physiological  or  psychological  in  its  origin  by  a  comparison 
of  the  accuracy  with  which  these  respective  measures  obey 
that  law,  although  such  a  comparison  would  not  be  crucial. 
If,  however,  the  difference  threshold  were  found  to  obey 
Weber's  Law  more  exactly  than  does  the  probable  error  of 
equality,  then  I  should  consider  this  distinctly  in  favor  of  a 
psychological  explanation  of  the  law.  But  I  should  myself 
anticipate  the  other  measure  to  obey  the  law  more  exactly, 
which,  although  by  no  means  proving  a  physiological  explana- 
tion to  be  correct,  would  nevertheless  point  in  that  direction. 


304  GODFREY  H.   THOMSON 

V.   PSYCHOMETRIC  FUNCTIONS 

Turning  now  temporarily  aside  from  the  considerations 
which  have  occupied  us  up  to  this  point,  let  us  consider  some 
questions  arising  out  of  what  is  known  as  the  search  for  the 
*  psychometric  function.'  These  functions  are  the  mathe- 
matical equations  which  best  fit  the  bell-curves  and  ogives 
into  which  psychometric  data  fall.  They  are  clearly  error 
functions  of  some  sort  or  other,  and  there  is  no  particular 
advantage  in  calling  them  psychometric  functions.  For  our 
purpose  here  it  is  sufficient  to  consider  the  possibility  of  the 
"psychometric  function"  being  the  normal  curve  of  error, 
and  to  leave  the  elaborations  necessary  when  more  compli- 
cated functions  are  used.  What  is  here  said  about  the  normal 
curve  is  typical  and  true  of  other  suggested  functions  such  as 
Professor  Pearson's  types. 

Consider  Fig.  I.  The  suggestion  has  been  made  by  many 
that  the  extreme  curves,  the  ogives,  are  integrals  of  the  normal 
curve  of  error.  The  bell-curve  in  the  center  is  deduced  by 
these  writers  by  first  forming  the  outer  curves  and  then 
subtracting  their  sum  from  unity  at  each  point.  All  the 
usual  arguments,  however,  which  support  the  view  that  the 
outer  curves  are  integral  normal  curves  would  lead  one  to 
expect,  when  applied  to  the  central  curve,  that  it  is  a  normal 
curve  as  it  stands.  But  this  is  impossible.  Two  such  normal 
ogives  added  together  and  subtracted  from  unity,  ordinate 
by  ordinate,  do  not  give  a  normal  bell  curve. 

VI.  EXTENSION  OF  THE  NOTION  OF  THE  PROBABILITY  OF  A 

JUDGMENT 

This  difficulty  can  I  think  be  overcome  if  we  recognize 
the  fact  that  these  curves  are  not  each  of  them  complete 
error  functions,  but  represent  one  error  function  divided  into 
three  parts  (the  division  itself  however  being  no  doubt  in 
turn  subject  to  an  error  distribution). 

This  involves  an  extension  of  the  idea  of  the  probability 
of  a  judgment.  In  its  simple  form  this  idea  compares  the 
giving  of  a  judgment  heavier,  undecided,  or  lighter,  with  draw- 
ing a  ball  from  an  urn  containing  say  red,  white,  and  blue 


INTERPRETATION  OF  THRESHOLD  MEASUREMENTS         3°5 

balls,  and  ascertaining  its  color.  For  each  stimulus  the  urn 
is  supposed  to  contain  different  proportions  of  the  colored 
balls. 

In  place  of  this  I  suggest  the  following.  For  each  stimulus 
imagine  an  urn  containing  an  infinite  number  of  balls  divided 
between  black  and  white  in  a  proportion  varying  in  some  way 
with  the  stimulus.  A  judgment  is  to  be  compared  with 
taking  not  one  but  a  handful  of  balls  from  the  urn,  and  the 
kind  of  judgment  is  to  depend  on  the  proportion  of  black 
balls  in  the  handful. 

VII.  THE  RESULTING  CURVES 

To  clear  our  ideas  let  us  take  a  concrete  case  with  small 
numbers.  Suppose  an  urn  contains  seven  tenths  black  and 
three  tenths  white  balls,  and  that  a  judgment  corresponds  to 
drawing  four.  The  possibilities  that  can  occur  in  such  a 
lottery  are  five  in  number,  namely 

Occurrence  Frequency 

4  black,  no  white 0.2401 

3      "       I       "     0.4116 

2      "       2      "     0.2646 

I      "       3       "     0.0756 

o     "       4      "     0.0081 

I.  oooo 

where  the  frequencies  are  the  terms  of  the  binomial  expansion 
(0.7  +  o.3)4. 

Now  suppose  that  either  4  or  3  balls  correspond  to  an 
answer  heavier,  2  to  an  answer  undecided,  and  I  or  o  to  an 
answer  lighter.  For  the  stimulus  in  question  the  relative 
frequencies  of  these  will  be: 

heavier       0.2401  +  0.4116  =  0.6517 
undecided  =  0.2646 

lighter        0.0756  +  0.0081  =  0.0837 

I. oooo 

Imagine  now  this  process  carried  out  for  a  number  of 
urns,  thus 


306 


GODFREY  H.   THOMSON 


1 

Vequency  of  Answer 

i 

Heavier 

Undecided 

Lighter 

o.o  black  

O.OOOO 

O.OOOO 

I.OOOO 

O.I              

o.oo-?7 

0.0486 

O.Q4.77 

0.2           

O.O272 

O.IC^6 

0.8192 

CM 

O.oSn 

j-5;; 
0.2646 

O.6?I7 

0.4. 

O.I79O 

o.-?4i;8 

O.47i;2 

o.c 

O.'?I2C 

O.'J7CO 

O.3I2C 

oi     .::::::::::::::::::: 

O.4.71;  2 

O.T4.C8 

O.I7QO 

0.7     

O.6CI7 

0.2646 

o.o8-?7 

0.8           

0.8192 

o.ic-?6 

O.O272 

O.Q 

0.04,77 

0.0486 

O.OO37 

I.O               

I.OOOO 

O.OOOO 

O.OOOO 

These  numbers  are  the  basis  of  the  three  curves  in  Fig.  3 
which  it  will  be  recognized  are  very  similar  to  those  actually 
found  in  psychological  experiment.  Skew  curves  are  easily 
obtained  by  placing  the  points  of  division  into  the  categories 
heavier,  undecided,  and  lighter  at  unequal  distances  from  the 


o.i      0.2 


0.3         0.4         0.5         0.6         0.7 
>  BLACK  BALLS  IN  URN 


0.8         0.9 


1.0 


FIG.  3 


center  of  the  underlying  error  curve.  The  actual  form  of 
the  curves  depends  on  the  way  in  which  the  #-axis  is  measured 
out.  In  this  diagram  the  simplest  assumption  is  made, 
namely,  that  the  proportion  of  black  balls  in  the  urn  is  a 
linear  function  of  the  stimulus,  and,  between  the  limits  at 
which  the  subject  answers  heavier  or  lighter  with  certainty, 
directly  represents  it.  The  number  of  balls  taken  in  the 
sample  which  represents  a  judgment  is  also  a  factor.  But 
ultimately  this  would  be  made  very  large,  and  Type  III. 
curves  would  replace  the  binomials. 


INTERPRETATION  OF  THRESHOLD  MEASUREMENTS         3°7 

On  this  point  of  view,  the  standard,  the  variable  stimulus, 
and  the  physiological  make-up  of  a  subject  decide  the  propor- 
tion of  black  balls  in  the  urn,  but  the  decision  as  to  what  pro- 
portion in  the  sample  is  to  be  called  heavier,  what  undecided 
and  what  lighter  depends  upon  a  conscious  act  of  the  subject, 
and  can  be  varied,  if  he  be  so  disposed,  at  his  whim;  and  will 
vary  with  his  mood  at  the  moment. 

The  difference  between  this  point  of  view  ^nd  the  older 
one  may  prove  to  be  academic  only,1  for  the  disentangling 
of  the  factors  which  are  here  distinguished  may  in  practice 
be  impossible.  Nevertheless  the  idea  seems  illuminating,  and 
this  sketch  is  put  forward  in  the  hope  that  some  of  the  result- 
ing curves  may  prove  of  interest  to  mathematical  statisticians, 
and  of  use  in  psychophysics. 

1  Indeed  it  may  be  that  mathematically  the  one  reduces  to  the  other,  at  any  rate 
under  certain  conditions. 


THE    CORRELATION    BETWEEN    INTERESTS    AND 
ABILITIES  IN  COLLEGE  COURSES 

BY  JAMES  W.  BRIDGES  AND  VERONA  M.  DOLLINGER 
Ohio  State  University 

It  is  obvious  that  achievement  in  any  vocation  depends 
partly  upon  ability  to  do  the  work  and  partly  upon  interest  in 
that  particular  kind  of  work.  The  latter  factor  is  not  less 
important  than  the  former,  for  it  supplies  the  necessary  in- 
centive to  the  greatest  endeavor.  The  problem  for  vocational 
guidance  is  therefore  to  measure  ability  and  interest. 

The  measurement  of  ability  whether  considered  as  special 
aptitude  or  as  general  intelligence  presents  no  great  obstacles. 
To  obtain  a  test  or  group  of  tests  whose  results  correlate  highly 
with  actual  achievement  in  any  vocation  is  a  relatively  simple 
psycho-statistical  problem.  The  measurement  of  interest  is  a 
much  more  difficult  matter.  No  objective  method  is  available. 
The  evaluation  of  interest  must  therefore  depend  entirely 
upon  subjective  estimate;  and  of  course  this  estimate  cannot 
be  made  until  the  subject  has  some  knowledge  of  the  work. 

If  it  can  be  shown  that  interest  is  highly  correlated  with 
ability,  the  problem  of  vocational  guidance  will  be  simplified; 
because  on  the  one  hand,  any  interest  on  the  part  of  the 
individual  will  give  him  definite  assurance  of  ability  in  that 
direction,  and  on  the  other  hand,  the  presence  of  a  definitely 
determined  ability  will  surely  indicate  an  interest  which 
perhaps  merely  awaits  experience  to  be  awakened.  If  how- 
ever, the  correlation  is  low,  as  the  results  of  this  study  seem 
to  indicate,  then  the  practical  problem  in  vocational  guidance 
will  be  to  determine  the  general  ability  and  special  aptitudes 
of  the  individual,  to  advise  him  as  to  the  several  occupations 
suited  to  his  intelligence  level  and  specific  abilities  and  let  him 
select  from  these  on  the  basis  of  his  interest,  together  with  other 
considerations  such  as  social  status  of  the  work  and  remunera- 
tion. 
308 


INTERESTS  AND  ABILITIES  IN  COLLEGE  COURSES          3°9 

The  problem  of  the  relation  between  interest  and  ability 
has  received  considerable  attention  from  educators  from  time 
to  time;  but  the  only  experimental  study  of  the  subject  known 
to  the  writers  is  that  reported  by  Professor  E.  L.  Thorndike 
of  Columbia  University.1  His  subjects,  college  students,  ar- 
ranged the  courses  of  their  curriculum,  namely — mathematics, 
history,  literature,  science,  music,  drawing,  and  other  hand- 
work, in  the  order  of  their  interest  and  then  later  in  the  order 
of  their  ability  in  them.  The  correlation  between  these  two 
orders  was  found  to  be  as  high  as  .89,  and  the  conclusion  was 
drawn  that  "A  person's  relative  interests  are  an  extraordinarily 
accurate  symptom  of  his  relative  capacities." 

It  seems  quite  probable  that  the  correlation  obtained,  .89, 
is  much  higher  than  the  actual  correlation  between  interests 
and  abilities,  for  a  subject's  ranking  of  his  courses  for  the  one 
is  likely  to  be  influenced  by  his  ranking  for  the  others.  Thorn- 
dike  points  out  that  it  would  be  "Better  to  get  the  measure- 
ments of  relative  interest  and  of  ability  .  .  .  not  from  indi- 
vidual reports  alone,  but  from  objective  tests."  A  satisfactory 
objective  test  for  interest  is  not  yet  available;  but  an  objective 
measurement  of  ability  would  seem  to  be  afforded  by  college 
grades,  especially  where  the  proportions  of  the  various  grades 
assigned  conform  approximately  to  the  normal  distribution. 
It  seemed,  therefore,  desirable  to  determine  the  correlation 
between  interests,  evaluated  subjectively  by  rankings  of 
courses,  and  abilities,  measured  objectively  by  grades  obtained 
in  these  same  courses. 

With  this  object  in  view,  several  hundred  students  were 
requested  at  the  beginning  of  the  semester  to  fill  out  and  return 
blanks  upon  which  were  printed  the  following  instructions: 
"Arrange  the  courses  you  are  studying  this  semester  according 
to  your  interest  in  them.  Place  first  in  the  list  the  course  you 
are  most  interested  in,  then  the  others  in  order.  Please  make 
your  judgments  carefully  and  deliberately,  and  try  as  far  as 
possible  to  avoid  influence  by  class  grades  or  preference  for 

1  'The  Permanence  of  Interests  and  Their  Relation  to  Abilities,"  Pop.  Sci.  Mo., 
1912,  81. 

'Early  Interests,  Their  Permanence  and  Relation  to  Abilities,'  School  and 
Society,  1917,  5. 


310  JAMES  W.  BRIDGES  AND  VERONA  M.  DOLLINGER 

instructor."  Just  below  a  space  on  the  blank  for  listing  the 
courses  a  second  instruction  was  given:  "Now  arrange  the 
subjects  you  are  studying  this  semester  according  to  your 
ability  in  them.  Try  to  make  your  judgments  independent  of 
your  interests  and  of  any  class  grades  you  may  have  received." 
Since  these  data  were  obtained  near  the  beginning  of  the 
semester,  the  influence  of  class  grades  upon  the  students* 
rankings  was  probably  negligible.  At  the  end  of  the  semester 
the  grades  actually  made  by  each  student  on  the  courses 
ranked  were  obtained  from  the  registrar's  office.  Ranging  in 
order  from  highest  to  lowest,  the  grades  used  in  the  university 
are:  M,  G,  A,  P,  and  F,  which  are  assigned  approximately 
in  conformity  with  the  proportions:  5,  20,  50,  20,  and  5. 

Records  were  obtained  from  over  five  hundred  students, 
and  the  number  of  courses  ranked  varied  with  different  students 
from  four  to  eight.  In  order  to  simplify  the  calculations  only 
those  records  with  five  courses  ranked  were  used  since  they 
furnished  the  bulk  of  the  material. 

The  relationship  between  these  interests  and  abilities  was 
determined  by  means  of  Pearson's  formula  for  mean  square 
contingency1  since  this  seems  best  adapted  to  such  rough  forms 
of  evaluation  of  traits.  The  coefficient  of  mean  square  con- 
tingency (C)  thus  obtained  is  somewhat  smaller  than  the 
coefficient  of  correlation  (r),  for  in  the  case  of  a  five  by  five-fold 
classification  the  former  (C)  cannot  exceed  .894.  However, 
with  coefficients  as  low  as  those  actually  obtained  the  difference 
becomes  relatively  negligible. 

The  relationship  between  rank  in  interest  and  grade  earned 
was  determined  first  for  a  specific  course  of  study,  namely, 
elementary  psychology.  All  records  that  reported  psychology 
were  used  irrespective  of  the  sex  or  college  year  of  the  student. 
The  data  are  presented  in  full  in  Table  I.,  an  inspection  of  which 
plainly  corroborates  the  low  coefficient  obtained  (.22).  The 
relationship  between  rank  in  interest  and  rank  in  ability  (as 
reported  by  the  subject  on  his  record  blank,  hereinafter  referred 
to  as  estimated  rank  in  ability)  was  next  determined  for  the 
same  course,  and  a  coefficient  of  .59  obtained.  Similar  coeffi- 

1  See  H.  D.  Rugg,  'Statistical  Methods  Applied  to  Education,'  pp.  299-307. 


INTERESTS  AND  ABILITIES  IN  COLLEGE  COURSES 


TABLE  I 

RELATION  BETWEEN  RANK  IN  INTEREST  AND  GRADE  EARNED  IN  PSYCHOLOGY' 


Grade 

Number 

Rank  in  Interest 

F 

P 

A 

G 

M 

Students 

I  

3 

8 

14 

IO 

5 

40 

2                          

1 

IO 

IO 

7 

9 

59 

1  .  . 

2 

ii 

11 

17 

8 

69 

I 

21 

30 

11 

7 

72 

4. 

IO 

27 

i  I 

4 

59 

Number  students  

13 

60 

132 

61 

33 

209 

1  The  letter  grades,  F,  P,  A,  G,  and  M,  are  assigned  approximately  in  conformity 
with  the  proportions:  5,  20,  50,  20,  and  5;  and  they  have  the  following  meanings: 
fail,  pass,  average,  good,  and  merit. 

cients  were  calculated  for  the  English  course  with  very  similar 
results  (see  Table  V.). 

Coefficients  might  have  been  calculated  in  the  same  way 
for  each  course  reported  by  the  students;  but  it  seemed  more 
desirable  to  obtain  a  coefficient  that  would  express  the  relation- 
ship between  rank  in  interest  and  grade  for  all  courses  com- 
bined. With  this  object  in  view  Table  II.  was  prepared  from 

TABLE  II 

RELATION  BETWEEN  RANK  IN  INTEREST  AND  GRADE  EARNED.    ALL  COURSES 

COMBINED 


Grade 

F 

P 

A 

G 

M 

Total 

I  

6 

A.2 

OO 

58 

C¥ 

2?6 

2  

7 

48 

111 

c.7 

11 

•*/- 
2^6 

1.  . 

12 

c-a 

TIC 

ce 

21 

•>, 
2CO 

4.  . 

11 

76 

IO1 

CO 

1.1 

**J 

2CO 

?.  • 

2C 

78 

£. 
IOO 

17 

IO 

2e 

2^6 

Total  

63 

297 

536 

257 

127 

1,280 

the  records  of  two  hundred  fifty-six  students  of  both  sexes  and 
all  college  years.  The  table  shows  the  distribution  of  grades 
for  the  two  hundred  fifty-six  courses  placed  first  in  interest, 
then  for  the  two  hundred  fifty-six  courses  placed  second  in 
interest,  and  so  on  for  the  third,  fourth,  and  fifth  places.  The 
grand  total  of  twelve  hundred  eighty  must  accordingly  be 
read  as  student-courses.  The  coefficient  calculated  from  this 
table  is  .25. 


312 


JAMES  W.  BRIDGES  AND  VERONA  M.  DOLLINGER 


The  relationship  between  rank  in  interest  and  estimated 
rank  in  ability  is  shown  in  a  similar  manner  in  Table  III. 
Each  row  of  figures  gives  the  distribution  in  ranks  of  estimated 
ability  for  a  given  rank  in  interest  for  291  students.  The 
coefficient  calculated  from  this  table  is  .57,  which  agrees  very 
closely  with  the  similar  coefficients  for  the  psychology  and 
English  courses. 

TABLE  III 

RELATION  BETWEEN  RANK  IN  INTEREST  AND  ESTIMATED  RANK  IN  ABILITY. 
ALL  COURSES  COMBINED 


Rank  in  Interest 

Estimated  Ability 

Total 

5 

4 

3 

2 

i 

I  

9 

18 

37 
63 
164 

19 

44 
69 

102 

57 

49 
72 
69 
65 
36 

63 

94 
66 

45 

23 

151 
.63 
SO 
16 
ii 

291 
291 
291 
291 
291 

2  

3-  • 

4.  • 

<>•  . 

Total  

291 

291 

291 

291 

291 

i,455 

The  low  correlation  so  far  indicated  between  rank  in  interest 
and  grade  and  the  relatively  higher  correlation  between  rank 
in  interest  and  estimated  rank  in  ability  point  to  the  mutual 
dependence  of  judgments  of  interest  and  of  ability.  A  low 
correlation  between  estimated  rank  in  ability  and  grade  might 
accordingly  be  expected.  Data  presenting  the  actual  relation- 

TABLE  IV 

RELATION  BETWEEN  ESTIMATED  RANK  IN  ABILITY  AND  GRADE  EARNED. 
ALL  COURSES  COMBINED 


Grade 

Estimated  Rank  in  Ability 

F 

P 

A 

G 

M 

Total 

I  

26 

07 

<;8 

4.4 

228 

2  1  . 

7 

4.8 

82 

62 

2O 

228 

3  .  . 

II 

AA 

112 

4-1 

2O 

228 

4.  .  . 

12 

61 

IOC 

•5Q 

II 

228 

«C  .  . 

2O 

76 

86 

08 

8 

228 

Total  

53 

255 

482 

238 

112 

1,140 

ship  are  given  in  Table  IV,  and  the  coefficient  was  found  to  be 
.28,  which  is  very  nearly  the  same  as  the  coefficient  for  rank  in 
interest  and  grade. 


INTERESTS  AND  ABILITIES  IN  COLLEGE  COURSES 


3'3 


The  relationship  between  rank  in  interest  and  grade  and 
between  rank  in  interest  and  estimated  rank  in  ability  was 
also  determined  for  each  sex  separately,  and  for  freshmen  and 
upper  class-men  separately.  The  results  show  no  significant 
differences.  Indeed,  all  the  coefficients  calculated  are  sur- 
prisingly uniform — a  fact  which  would  seem  to  indicate  their 
general  validity.  Table  V,  which  sums  up  all  the  results, 

TABLE  V 

COEFFICIENTS  OF  MEAN  SQUARE  CONTINGENCY  (C) 


Between  Rank  in  Interest 
and  Grade 

Between  Rank  in  Interest  and 
Estimated  Rank  in  Ability 

C 

No.  Cases 

C 

No.  Cases 

Psychology  

.22 
.27 

•2! 
.26 

.26 

•25 
.28 

315 

394 

256 
171 
85 
157 

99 

•59 
•57 

3 

•54 
•57 
•5° 

I58 
194 
291 
201 
90 

Ǥ 

106 

English  

All  courses  

All  courses  (males)  

All  courses  (females)  

All  courses  (i  yr.)  

All  courses  (2,  3,  4,  yr.)  

will  facilitate  comparison.    The  coefficient  obtained  and  the 
number  of  cases  used  in  each  calculation  are  given. 

It  will  be  noted  that  the  contingency  coefficients  for  rank 
in  interest  and  grade  range  from  .22  to  .28,  and  for  rank  in 
interest  and  estimated  rank  in  ability  from  .50  to  .59.  The 
product-moment  coefficient  of  correlation  in  the  former  case 
would  probably  not  be  over  .30  and  in  the  latter  not  over  .65. 
This  latter  figure  is  much  lower  than  that  obtained  by  Pro- 
fessor Thorndike  (.89)  in  the  experiment  referred  to  above; 
but,  as  a  measure  of  the  relationship  between  interest  and 
actual  ability,  it  is  probably  much  too  high,  and  is  merely  a 
result  of  the  subjective  method  of  evaluating  ability.  When 
ability  is  measured  by  a  more  objective  means,  namely  college 
grades,  a  very  low  correlation  between  interest  and  ability  is 
obtained,  so  low  in  fact  that  one  might  well  be  justified  in  the 
statement:  A  person's  relative  interests  are  an  extraordinarily 
twaccurate  symptom  of  his  relative  capacities.  It  might  also 
be  inferred  from  data  here  presented  that  a  person's  estimate  of 
his  ability  is  an  extraordinarily  inaccurate  symptom  of  his  real 
ability,  for  the  correlation  between  the  students'  rankings  of 
their  courses  in  ability  and  the  grades  obtained  is  only  .28. 


314  JAMES  W.  BRIDGES  AND  VERONA  M.  DOLLINGER 

There  are,  to  be  sure,  many  obvious  objections  to  the  use 
of  college  grades  as  measures  of  ability.  First,  a  grade  is  also 
in  part  a  measure  of  interest  since  the  persistent  application 
which  earns  the  higher  grades  is  based  very  largely  upon 
interest.  The  effect  of  this  would  be  to  increase  the  correlation. 
That  is  to  say,  in  so  far  as  the  grade  earned  depends  directly 
upon  the  incentive  supplied  by  interest,  the  coefficients  given 
above  are  too  high  as  measures  of  the  relationship  between 
interests  and  ability.  Secondly,  college  grades  are  not  suffi- 
ciently discriminative;  and,  consequently,  a  student  may  ob- 
tain the  same  grade  in  all  his  courses  when  his  actual  abilities 
are  perhaps  not  so  even.  In  so  far  as  this  is  true,  the  coeffi- 
cients reported  are  too  low.  Thirdly,  grades  are  also  dependent 
upon  general  intelligence  (if  there  be  one).  This  would  tend 
to  make  the  grades  of  each  student  uniform;  and  would  have 
the  same  effect  upon  the  correlation  as  the  factor  last  men- 
tioned. Finally,  grades  are  also  affected  by  other  factors, 
such  as  personal  relation  between  student  and  instructor,  out- 
side activities  of  the  student,  home  environment  of  the  student, 
and  so  forth.  All  these  factors  would,  presumably,  affect  the 
correlation  adversely. 

The  writers  are  therefore  not  ready  to  draw  any  certain 
conclusions  from  this  short  study  regarding  the  actual  relation- 
ship between  interests  and  abilities.  The  problem  is  an 
extremely  complicated  one;  and  it  cannot  be  solved  until  a 
more  objective  method  of  evaluating  interests,  as  well  as 
abilities,  is  forthcoming.  Achievement,  as  has  already  been 
said  depends  upon  both  interest  and  ability.  If  these  are  not 
highly  correlated,  the  conclusion  of  practical  importance  for 
vocational  guidance  is  that  both  must  somehow  be  evaluated 
separately. 


VISUAL  PHENOMENA  IN  THE  DREAMS  OF  A  BLIND 

SUBJECT 

BY  RAYMOND  H.  WHEELER 

University  of  Oregon 

The  subject  whose  dreams  are  herein  reported  was  a 
student  at  the  University  of  Oregon  from  1915-1918.  He 
was  a  trained  introspector  and  at  the  time  of  this  investiga- 
tion he  had  had  several  courses  in  psychology,  including 
laboratory.  After  a  preliminary  period  of  training  in  re- 
cording dreams  he  found  it  possible  to  describe  the  important 
details  in  note  form,  in  American  Braille,  immediately  upon 
waking.  These  notes  were  subsequently  edited  by  the 
writer  with  the  help  of  the  reagent,  great  care  being  taken  to 
omit  all  uncertain  or  otherwise  questionable  details.  The 
reagent  lost  his  sight  by  accident  when  eleven  years  old. 
He  is  now  twenty-seven. 

Although  the  primary  purpose  of  this  paper  is  to  report 
visual  phenomena  in  the  dream  life  of  a  blind  subject  after 
sixteen  years  of  blindness,  it  is  interesting  to  note,  in  addition, 
that  in  his  dreams  we  find  a  peculiar  association  between 
visual  images  and  images  in  other  modalities.  In  his  waking 
life  the  subject  has  very  complicated  synaesthetic  phenomena. 
It  has  been  noted  in  the  literature1  that  in  certain  instances 
those  individuals  who  possess  associations  between  visual 
and  other  sensations  in  their  perceptual  processes  also  asso- 
ciate these  modalities  in  a  similar  fashion  in  their  imaginal 
processes.  This  is  also  true  of  our  reagent.  As  far  as  the 
writer  knows,  however,  such  phenomena  in  dreams  have  not 
been  described  in  the  literature.  For  the  convenience  of 
the  reader  the  reagent's  descriptions  of  these  associations  are 

printed  in  italics. 

DREAM  i 

First  I  had  a  rather  confused  visual  image  of  a  portion  of  a  room  including  one 
large  window  and  the  surrounding  walls.    The  light  which  came  through  the  window 
1  To  be  reported  in  a  subsequent  paper. 
315 


31 6  RAYMOND  H.   WHEELER 

was  dim,  giving  the  appearance  of  a  heavy  fog  or  thick  dust  which  seemed  to  fill  the 
room.  I  could  distinctly  "see"  the  rays  of  light  penetrating  through  the  fog.  The 
space  in  the  room,  penetrated  by  the  light,  seemed  to  be  about  six  feet  wide  and  three 
feet  deep.  Accompanying  this  visual  imagery  was  a  marked  unpleasantness,  a  vivid 
organic  and  kinaesthetic  experience  consisting  of  a  tension  in  the  muscles  of  my  arm, 
of  a  tightening  in  the  vocal  cords  and  of  contractions  in  the  muscles  of  my  jaws,  the 
latter  resulting  in  a  state  of  marked  rigidity.  Then  I  had  a  sense  of  "half  pressure  and 
half  buzzing"  in  my  ears  and  a  diffuse  and  vague  tension  in  the  muscles  of  the  brows, 
forehead,  neck  and  chest.  The  unpleasantness  and  kin&sthetic  tensions  were  linked,  in 
consciousness,  with  the  foggy,  yellow  light.  The  second  group  of  experiences  constituted 
an  awareness  that  I  was  near  the  walls  of  the  room. 

Then  I  suddenly  found  myself  in  a  second  room  in  a  house  some  distance  away 
and  to  the  south  of  the  first.  Here  my  imagery  was  somewhat  similar  to  the  preceding 
but  lacking  the  yellow  light  and  the  affective  accompaniments.  I  infer  that  this 
house  was  strange  for  there  was  nothing  familiar  about  it.  I  was  then  conscious  of 
looking  from  where  I  now  stood  toward  the  direction  of  the  house  I  had  previously 
been  in.  Simultaneously  with  this  change  in  my  line  of  regard  I  had  a  vague  flash  of 
straw-colored  light.  This  meant  "south"  to  me,  which  I  innervated  in  vocal-motor 
fashion:  "south."  (My  notion  of  "south"  is  associated,  in  waking  consciousness, 
with  straw-colored  light.)  I  then  noticed  two  friends  in  the  room.  Both  were  sitting 
to  my  right  and  a  little  in  front  of  me.  To  my  left  and  very  near  me  was  localized  a 
very  dark  mass,  somewhat  of  the  size  and  general  shape  of  a  person,  with  a  thick,  hazy 
area  as  a  fainter  background.  The  lines  of  his  shoulders,  chest  and  arms  to  the  elbows 
were  the  only  distinct  features  of  the  figure.  Instantly  I  had  the  faintest  tendency  to 
turn  in  his  direction.  This  was  the  first  intimation  that  I  had  had  of  being  in  this 
house  with  a  companion.  /  was  unable  to  recognize  him  for  the  color  of  the  imagery  was 
too  faded.  (In  waking  life  I  always  identify  people,  in  imagery,  by  their  color.) 

The  friend  to  my  right,  seated  nearest  me  was  a  vague  form  in  sitting  position,  colored 
a  very  deep  shade  of  blue.  The  only  features  which  approached  distinctness  were 
outlines  of  his  head,  arms,  legs  and  trunk.  I  imagine  that  the  form  appeared  much 
the  same  as  a  person  might  look  through  a  thick  blue  lens  with  the  object  much  out  of 
focus.  The  other  figure  was  fawn-colored  yellow,  of  medium  brightness  and  rather  poor 
saturation.  I  identified  both  of  these  persons  by  their  colors. 

Then  there  appeared  a  very  irregular  image  of  a  large  oak  chair  finished  with 
yellow  wood  and  black  leather  upholstering.  The  imagery  was  localized  and  dis- 
tributed in  space  in  a  position  corresponding  to  the  details  of  a  chair  which  are  visible 
to  the  eye  when  one  is  sitting.  I  also  had  tactual  imagery  of  the  "feel"  of  the  up- 
holstering and  kinsesthetic  imagery  of  the  bodily  position  assumed  in  sitting  in  this 
style  of  furniture. 

I  was  then  conscious  of  saying:  "Hello  boys;  when  did  you  get  in?"  There  was 
no  answer.  My  attention  then  became  more  rigidly  fixed  upon  the  two  visual  forms 
as  I  thought  to  myself  in  verbal  imagery:  "Why  don't  they  answer?"  I  then  spoke 
again:  "I  want  you  fellows  to  come  over  and  see  me  while  you  are  here."  Again  no 
answer.  I  then  became  very  angry;  I  was  conscious  of  intense  tightening  of  muscles 
in  my  arms  and  chest  together  with  a  characteristic  tension  in  the  back  of  my  scalp. 
(This  latter  is  characteristic  of  anger  in  waking  life.)  With  the  growing  anger  the 
colors  of  the  two  forms  became  very  much  brighter.  I  then  turned  to  the  figure  at  my  left, 
which  represented  my  companion,  and  said:  "Let's  go  back."  I  then  found  myself 
back  in  the  first  house  but  this  time  in  a  different  room,  for  the  window  was  on  the 


VISUAL  PHENOMENA  IN  DREAMS  OF  BUND  SUBJECT      3*7 

west  side  and  there  was  a  telephone  on  the  wall.  The  window  curtains  were  streak* 
of  drab-grey,  which,  I  suspect,  is  my  representation  of  white.  The  room  was  large, 
which  I  interpret  from  the  fact  that  I  experienced  no  pressure  images.  My  awareness 
of  the  telephone  consisted  of  visual  and  tactual  imagery.  I  "saw"  the  brownish 
wooden  box  containing  the  mechanism  of  the  telephone.  In  the  middle  of  the  trans- 
mitter was  a  circle  of  rather  brilliant  light  which  told  me  the  exact  place  into  which 
to  direct  my  voice.  The  hard  rubber  mouthpiece  was  visualized  as  black;  the  receiver 
hook  was  a  shining  steel-gray  as  were  also  the  bells.  The  outlines  of  these  objects 
were  fairly  distinct  but  fleeting.  I  then  had  the  vocal-motor:  "I  will  call  up  the  boys 
and  ask  them  over  to  see  me."  I  had  kinsesthetic  and  tactual  imagery  of  taking  down 
the  receiver  and  of  holding  it  to  my  ear,  with  a  distinct  image  of  coldness  as  the  edge 
of  the  receiver  came  in  contact  with  my  ear.  No  further  imagery  appeared  until  the 
vocal-motor:  "They  won't  answer,"  whereupon  I  was  extremely  disappointed  and 
angry.  Here  I  had  the  characteristic  sinking  experiences  localized  in  the  region  of  the 
diaphragm,  inhibition  of  breathing  and  tensions  in  the  throat  and  chest.  I  then  had 
the  vocal-motor:  "You  can  go  straight  to  the  devil."  At  this  moment  I  became  con- 
scious of  a  person  in  back  of  me,  visualized  as  a  bright  and  silvery  form,  which  meant  to 
me  that  the  form  was  a  woman.  I  then  had  auditory  imagery  of  her  voice:  "He 
has  drowned  in  the  creek."  Simultaneously  with  the  "he"  there  appeared  a  dark 
visual  schema  to  my  right,  very  indistinct  and  not  sufficiently  colored  for  identification. 
I  next  found  myself  searching  for  the  creek.  I  was  visualizing  myself  walking  up  a 
slope  along  a  winding  path.  My  consciousness  of  surrounding  objects  consisted  only 
of  kinaesthetic  imagery  of  shrinking,  dodging  or  otherwise  avoiding  branches,  rocks  and 
trees.  I  was  distinctly  conscious  of  an  awkwardness  with  tensions  in  the  trunk,  legs, 
face  and  shoulders,  all  of  which  contributed  to  an  awareness  that  I  was  uncertain  where 
to  step.  I  then  found  myself  at  a  gate.  I  stepped  back  and  watched  a  visual  image  of 
myself  looking  over  the  gate  up  the  hill.  Suddenly  I  lost  the  "visual  me"  and  was 
looking  at  the  gate  at  close  quarters.  The  transition  was  almost  instantaneous.  I 
now  visualized  the  two  gate  posts  distinctly,  together  with  the  braces  attached  to  the 
top  of  each  post.  Just  beyond  the  braces  was  the  woven  wire,  silvery  in  color,  as  if 
it  had  been  galvanized  recently.  I  was  then  conscious  of  fingering  the  wires,  at  which 
instant  the  visual  imagery  became  more  distinct.  I  was  aware,  next,  that  just  be- 
yond the  gate  was  a  hill.  I  did  not  visualize  the  hill  distinctly;  it  was  merely  a  brownish 
haze — a  color  which  represents  rank  undergrowth  to  me;  but  I  was  distinctly  conscious 
of  tactual  and  auditory  imagery  of  being  in  the  shadow  of  a  hill.  The  tactual  experi- 
ences refer  to  changes  in  temperature  and  the  auditory  to  changes  in  echo.  I  retraced 
my  steps  down  the  hill  and  while  on  the  way  noticed  a  group  of  oak  trees  which  I 
had  "seen"  on  my  way  up.  I  visualized  their  peculiar  dark  brown  trunks,  knotted 
and  gnarled,  and  had  tactual  imagery  of  running  my  hand  over  the  bark,  covered  with 
moss  and  lichens.  I  could  see  upward  as  far  as  the  first  branches  but  beyond  that  the 
trees  faded  into  a  hazy  background,  thence  into  nothingness.  The  brown  of  the 
trunks  was  faded  and  dim,  the  color  irregular  in  distribution,  giving  the  effect  of  a 
pouring  rain  on  a  window  pane — a  "wiggly"  appearance. 

At  this  point  in  the  dream  I  was  conscious  of  the  person  who  went  with  me  to 
the  second  strange  house.  This  consisted  of  a  colored  visual  schema  at  my  left,  too  vague, 
however,  to  identify,  and  also  of  a  peculiar  motor  "start,"  characteristic  of  a  sudden 
consciousness  of  a  person  near  you.  We  had  a  short  conversation  concerning  the  oak 
.trees,  the  details  of  which  I  cannot  remember.  I  recall  that  both  his  words  and  mine 
were  in  my  own  verbal  imagery. 


3i8  RAYMOND  H.  WHEELER 

I  next  found  myself  at  the  edge  of  the  creek,  vividly  aware  that  I  was  facing  the 
creek  and  that  the  first  strange  house  I  had  entered  was  back  of  me.  This  was  present 
in  terms  of  a  faint  brownish  haze  off  at  the  horizon  back  of  me.  The  water  in  the  creek 
was  sluggish  and  a  dark  opaque,  oily  green.  The  water  almost  overran  the  banks. 
Next  to  the  edge  of  the  stream  I  visualized  masses  of  dead,  pale,  straw-colored  grass, 
most  of  which  was  very  hazy  except  for  the  larger  tufts  in  which  latter  I  seemed  to 
"see"  some  of  the  individual  blades.  The  grass  lined  both  banks  of  the  stream  and 
extended  over  into  the  water.  Suddenly  I  "saw"  a  collar  and  necktie  floating  down 
the  stream,  too  far  out  to  be  reached.  I  viewed  them  indifferently  until  I  had  the 
vocal-motor:  "It  is  A's  collar!"  Upon  experiencing  the  verbal  imagery  I  was  con- 
scious of  intense  grief,  represented  by  marked  feelings  of  stuffiness  in  my  chest  and  by 
tendencies  to  sob.  I  awoke  and  actually  found  myself  sobbing.  Although  I  did 
not  notice  it  particularly  at  the  time,  I  am  certain,  on  recalling  the  imagery  of  the 
collar,  that  it  was  white.  The  tie  was  blue  with  large  brown  bands  running  diagonally 
across  it.  I  could  not  "see"  those  portions  of  the  objects  below  the  surface  of  the 
water. 

DREAM  2 

I  was  seated  in  a  passenger  coach,  midway  between  the  ends,  on  the  right  side  of 
the  car  and  next  to  the  window.  I  could  "see"  the  vague  form  and  outline  of  the  sun- 
bleached  red  plush  seat  directly  in  front  of  me.  For  some  little  distance  in  front  I 
could  distinguish  the  yellow  woodwork  between  the  windows  but  farther  down  the 
coach  the  woodwork  became  very  indistinct.  A  brilliant  light  was  shining  through 
the  windows,  illuminating  the  coach.  Mixed  with  the  visual  images  of  the  plush 
seats  were  tactual  images  of  the  friction  of  my  trousers  as  they  adhered  to  the  plush, 
preventing  me  from  making  slight  movements  with  ease.  I  also  had  clear  tactual 
imagery  of  my  arm  as  it  rested  in  the  sill  of  the  car  window. 

The  objects  in  the  surrounding  country  were  vague  and  fleeting  and  seemed  to 
pass  by  very  rapidly.  They  were  of  the  brightness  and  tint  of  vegetation  in  the  sandy 
desert.  Now  and  then  I  was  conscious  of  vague  outlines  of  the  rolling  hills,  stretching 
out  in  the  far  distance.  I  was  travelling  northeast,  indicated  to  me  by  a  large  area  of 
dense  blackness  which  was  projected  beyond  the  side  of  the  car  off  to  the  front  and  to  the 
left.  This  dark  or  black  horizon  meant  north.  The  relation  of  the  black  schema  to 
the  side  of  the  car  I  interpreted  to  mean  northeast.  Then  I  noticed  that  my  position 
in  the  coach  had  changed.  I  was  riding  backward.  The  dark  cloud  was  now  at  my 
back  and  to  my  right.  I  became  conscious  that  my  brother  was  with  me.  This  was  in 
terms  of  a  gray  splotch  about  the  size  of  a  man,  in  sitting  position  opposite  me.  My 
brother  said:  "We  are  coming  to  the  Blue  Mountains."  Although  he  seemed  to  be 
speaking  these  words,  for  I  was  listening  in  his  direction,  the  words  themselves  came 
to  me  in  my  own  verbal  imagery. 

Looking  out  of  the  window  to  my  left  I  visualized  a  range  of  steep  mountains 
rising  abruptly  from  the  desert.  Here  the  brightness  of  the  landscape  greatly  increased; 
various  vaguely  outlined  hills  passed  by  the  window  rapidly;  the  hills  toward  the 
south  were  dark  blue,  fading  into  a  dull  grey  the  nearer  they  were  to  me.  Mixed  with 
the  awareness  of  this  blue  schema  was  a  tactual  image  of  tall  thick  grass  soaked  with 
rain.  As  the  number  of  hills  increased  I  was  conscious  of  a  distinct  feeling  of  relief, 
referred  to  muscular  relaxations  about  the  brows,  eyes  and  jaws.  The  thicker  the 
hills  became,  the  more  marked  became  the  relief  until  it  merged  into  wonder  and  sur- 
prise. The  muscles  of  my  chest  became  tense;  I  was  conscious  of  tendencies  to  smile. 
I  noticed  that  on  the  sides  of  the  nearest  hills  there  were  dark  patches.  Then  I  vocal- 


VISUAL  PHENOMENA  IN  DREAMS  OF  BLIND  SUBJECT      319 

ized  my  brother's  words  as  he  spoke  again:  "The  dark  places  are  where  they  graze 
their  sheep.  The  dry  and  sandy  places  are  where  the  coyotes  live."  Following 
these  latter  words  I  had  fleeting  visual  images  of  a  comparatively  level  stretch  of 
ground,  covered  with  innumerable  greyish  rocks,  scattered  thickly  over  a  faded, 
yellowish-brown  soil. 

DREAM  3 

I  was  in  the  middle  of  a  river,  astride  a  log.  All  about  me  the  water  for  twenty 
or  thirty  feet  was  jet  black  and  so  dense  that  I  could  not  "see"  below  the  surface.  The 
log  was  about  eight  inches  in  diameter  and  quite  distinctly  visualized  as  an  old  alder 
snag  which  was  smooth,  with  no  bark  and  a  very  light  grey  in  color.  The  size  of 
the  log  is  an  interpretation  partly  from  the  visual  image  and  partly  from  the  extent 
to  which  it  protruded  out  of  the  water.  Its  smoothness  was  present  to  consciousness 
partly  as  an  interpretation  from  the  visualized  surface  and  partly  from  the  fact  that 
my  legs  were  adjusted  in  such  fashion  as  to  prevent  my  slipping  on  the  surface. 

I  had  very  distinct  motor  imagery  of  balancing  myself.  This  involved  my  legs, 
trunk  and  arms.  I  judge  that  I  was  about  one  third  of  the  distance  back  from  the 
front  end  of  the  log  which  I  gather  from  the  manner  in  which  the  log  responded  to  my 
movements.  I  was  going  down  stream  rapidly.  This  latter  consciousness  came  to 
me  in  terms  of  a  visual  image  of  a  dark,  ribbon-like  streamer  indicating  how  the  water 
was  being  "cut"  by  the  passage  of  my  feet  through  it.  I  also  had  tactual  imagery 
of  water  rushing  rapidly  by  my  hand,  an  experience  similar  to  the  sensations  one  re- 
ceives when  placing  his  hands  in  the  water  as  he  rides  in  a  fast  boat.  Together  with 
this  latter  visual  imagery  was  auditory  imagery  of  the  swishing  of  the  water.  I  do 
not  know  how  fast  the  current  was  flowing  but  I  seemed  to  be  travelling  faster  than 
the  stream.  I  had  tactual-kinaesthetic  imagery  of  being  hurled  rapidly  through  space 
in  the  direction  of  down-stream. 

All  about  me,  especially  to  the  left  and  in  front,  small  fish,  about  ten  inches  long, 
were  continually  jumping  out  of  the  black,  inky  water.  They  leaped  only  a  few  inches 
above  the  surface,  looked  at  me  and  disappeared  with  a  croak.  I  could  not  visualize 
the  fish  clearly  but  merely  got  their  general  shape  and  size.  Sometimes  they  would 
appear  only  on  the  surface  of  the  water;  they  would  extend  their  heads  upward  until 
their  gills  appeared  when  they  would  utter  a  peculiar  sound  and  disappear  again.  In 
many  instances  I  had  auditory  imagery  of  their  croaks  together  with  a  flash  of  yellow 
light,  hovering,  temporarily,  about  the  region  of  their  mouths.  In  other  instances  I  was 
aware  only  of  the  yellow  light,  which,  however,  meant  to  me  that  they  were  making  their 
peculiar  sounds.  Some  of  the  fish  were  striped  grey  and  black,  the  stripes  running 
across  their  sides  from  the  lower  front  to  the  upper  back,  thus  making  diagonal  bars 
across  their  bodies.  I  was  next  conscious  of  the  vocal-motor:  "These  are  singing  carp." 
Then  I  had  a  visual  image  of  a  fish  net  lying  upon  the  log  in  front  of  me,  and  the  vocal- 
motor:  "I  have  a  net  and  will  get  some." 

DREAM  4 

I  was  under  the  south  end  of  a  bridge.  I  was  facing  the  south  with  the  stream  in 
back  of  me.  I  have  a  very  distinct  remembrance  of  visualizing  the  supports  of  the 
bridge  as  I  looked  through  them  toward  a  cloud  of  yellow  light  off  in  the  distance.  This 
cloud  of  yellow  light  meant  south.  I  did  not  visualize  the  bridge  above  me  but  was 
aware  in  auditory  terms  of  the  faint  echo  and  in  tactual  terms  of  the  nearness  of  the 
bridge  to  me.  I  then  had  visual  and  kinaesthetic  imagery  of  piling  rocks  into  a  gunny 
sack.  I  was  greatly  disturbed  both  by  the  fear  of  getting  caught  and  by  my  bull- 


32°  RAYMOND  H.  WHEELER 

dog  which  kept  barking,  and  pulling  vigorously  at  my  trouser's  leg.  Here  the  tactual 
and  auditory  imagery  was  profuse  and  clear.  The  imagery  of  the  dog's  form  was  in- 
distinct save  for  a  bright  straw-colored  schema  which  always  represents  this  dog  to  me.  I 
was  holding  one  corner  of  the  sack  with  my  left  hand  (tactual,  motor  and  visual  im- 
agery) and  the  sack  itself  was  a  dark  yellowish-brown.  I  could  not  "see"  the  weave 
and  did  not  notice  any  tactual  imagery  of  it.  Then  there  appeared  the  verbal  imagery: 
"I  want  A  to  see  these  before  anyone  finds  me."  Then  I  was  vividly  aware  of  the 
fact  that  D  might  find  me.  This  consisted  of  tenseness  about  the  chest  and  abdomen, 
with  "sinking  sensations"  in  the  region  of  my  stomach.  D  was  represented  to  me  in 
terms  of  peculiar  flashes  of  color  which  corresponded  to  his  voice.  I  then  awoke. 

Three  striking  peculiarities  stand  out  in  the  dreams  given 
above.  First  is  the  appearance  of  associations  between 
visual  and  other  sense  modalities,  which,  in  every  instance 
conform  to  synaesthetic  phenomena  in  the  reagent's  waking 
life.  Schematic  forms  of  persons  are  identified  by  color. 
Persons'  voices  are  recognized  by  their  color;  directions  of 
the  compass,  the  "croaking"  of  the  singing  carp,  the  bull 
dog,  are  all  identified  by  certain  colors.  The  reagent's 
auditory  imagery  is  exceedingly  deficient  both  in  dream 
and  in  waking  life  but  this  deficiency  is  largely  compensated 
for  by  visual  associations  or  synsesthetic  phenomena. 

Secondly,  our  subject  has  the  peculiar  tendency  to  vocalize 
the  spoken  words  of  another  person's  voice  in  terms  of  his 
own  vocal-motor  imagery.  Colors  provide  the  necessary 
qualitative  differences  for  identification.  This  is  true  both 
of  waking  and  of  dream  consciousness.  Verbal  imagery  is 
very  rarely  syncopated  or  abbreviated  and  is  very  definite 
in  details  of  enunciation  and  of  expression. 

Thirdly,  there  is  to  be  noticed  a  peculiar  tendency,  in  the 
subject's  dreams,  to  visualize  himself  at  a  distance.  Various 
details,  which  the  writer  has  been  able  to  obtain  on  this 
point,  indicate  that  the  subject  often  has  a  "visual  me" 
in  dreams.  This  "visual  me"  is  evidently  a  product  of 
repeated  tendencies  on  the  part  of  the  subject  to  visualize 
himself  as  he  walks  about  in  order  to  ascertain,  if  possible, 
whether  he  showed  his  blindness  in  any  peculiarities  of  walk- 
ing. This  "visual  me"  appears  to  him  frequently,  in  dreams, 
if  he  is  conscious  of  being  watched.  The  visualized  figure 
consists  mostly  of  hands  and  feet,  separated  and  in  move- 
ment as  if  in  walking.  Peculiar  feeling  complexes  are  associ- 


VISUAL  PHENOMENA  IN  DREAMS  OF  BUND  SUBJECT      321 

ated  with  this  visual  imagery  but  otherwise  the  experiences 
have  not  been  definitely  analyzed.  Occasionally  this  "visual 
me"  appears  close  to  the  subject  but  it  is  usually  localized 
some  distance  away. 

Visual  imagery  still  outnumbers  other  modalities  both  in 
the  subject's  dreams  and  in  his  waking  life.  This  imagery 
has  now  become  vague  in  form  and  outline.  For  example, 
persons  lack  outlines  of  eyes,  mouth,  ears,  fingers,  and  de- 
tails of  trunk  and  legs.  The  size  and  duration  of  the  imagery, 
however,  have  remained  practically  normal.  Visual  imagery 
of  small  objects  similarly  lacks  definiteness  but  possesses 
a  greater  degree  of  clearness  than  does  visual  imagery  of 
larger  objects.  This  is  undoubtedly  due  to  the  fact  that  the 
act  of  handling  small  objects  makes  it  easier  for  the  reagent 
to  visualize  them.  In  fact,  when  the  subject  wishes  to  vis- 
ualize an  object  clearly  he  always  endeavors  to  explore  it 
in  tactual-motor  fashion.  In  the  first  dream  it  will  be 
noticed  that  as  soon  as  the  reagent  found  himself  fingering 
the  wire  in  the  fence,  its  color  increased  in  vividness  and  the 
outlines  of  the  visual  imagery  became  more  distinct. 

All  visual  imagery  lacks  details  as  well  as  form  and  out- 
line. The  room  visualized  in  the  first  dream  was  devoid  of 
furniture.  In  like  manner  were  lacking  the  details  of  the 
telephone,  the  lace  curtains,  the  chair,  the  scenery  along  the 
path,  the  trees,  bushes,  clothing,  etc.  A  hill  is  a  mass  of 
color  with  light  and  dark  patches;  mountains  are  clouds  of 
color;  water  is  lacking  in  detail  of  wave  or  brightness;  trees 
are  visualized  only  in  part,  and  so  on. 

Taking  the  place  of  details  in  visual  imagery  are  auditory- 
vocal-motor,  tactual  and  kinaesthetic-organic  experiences. 
For  example,  the  visual  imagery  of  oak  trees  in  dream  i 
is  pieced  out  with  tactual  imagery  of  exploring  the  surface 
of  the  trunk.  The  visual  imagery  of  being  seated  in  a  chair 
is  supplemented  by  tactual  imagery.  The  same  is  true  of 
talking  through  a  telephone. 

Kinaesthetic  imagery  is  exceedingly  clear  and  persistent. 
In  many  instances  the  reagent  has  hesitated  in  calling  these 
experiences  "images"  owing  to  their  vividness,  and  dis- 


322  RAYMOND  H.  WHEELER 

tinctness  of  localization.  Such  imagery  is  very  readily 
recalled.  Organic  complexes  constitute  an  important  feature 
of  our  reagent's  dreams.  While  experiencing  joy,  for  instance, 
he  feels  the  characteristic  changes  in  respiration,  the  tenden- 
cies to  smile,  and  the  pleasantness;  while  in  fear  he  is  able 
to  detect  the  tensions  in  the  throat,  the  organic  changes  from 
the  regions  of  the  stomach  and  diaphragm,  and  the  altered 
breathing.  Again,  in  anger  he  is  aware  of  the  jaw  tensions, 
the  tightness  of  arms  and  hands,  and  the  changes  in  facial 
expression,  all  of  which  seem  to  be  exact  copies  of  experiences 
in  waking  life.  Organic  processes  seem  to  be  recalled  with 
greater  readiness  than  visual  details. 

We  believe  that  the  above  descriptions  demonstrate  that 
the  introspective  method — at  least  the  terminology — can  be 
applied  in  the  description  of  dreams.  Whereas  it  may  be 
contended  that  the  chief  interest  in  dreams  pertains  to  their 
function  rather  than  to  their  content,  it  is  obvious  that  the 
significance  of  dreams  can  be  much  better  understood  if 
their  content  is  first  described  in  minute  detail.  Such  descrip- 
tions should  be  obtained  by  using  a  method  patterned  after 
introspection  rather  than  after  interpretation. 


VOL.  27,  No.  5  September,  1920 


THE  PSYCHOLOGICAL  REVIEW 


THE   PHYSICAL  BASIS  OF  NERVE  FUNCTIONS 

BY  LEONARD  THOMPSON  TROLAND 

Harvard  University 

I.    INTRODUCTION 

Modern  experimental  investigations  of  the  laws  governing 
nervous  action,  combined  with  theoretical  studies  based 
upon  these  investigations,  provide  us  with  the  materials  for  a 
very  definite  and  satisfactory  conception  of  the  physical 
mechanism  of  the  process.  It  is  the  purpose  of  the  present 
article  to  sketch  a  rough  picture  of  the  probable  nature  of 
this  mechanism,  in  the  hope  that  the  sketch  may  prove  valu- 
able to  some  psychologists  who  may  not  have  followed  closely 
modern  developments  in  this  field.  I  do  not  wish  to  claim 
any  essential  originality  for  the  general  ideas  to  be  presented, 
although  it  is  my  belief  that  the  total  picture  which  I  shall 
outline  has  not  been  offered  heretofore  and  that  some  of  the 
suggestions  which  will  be  made  concerning  details  are  new. 
My  views  are  founded  mainly  upon  the  writings  of  Nernst,1 
R.  S.  Lillie,2  and  Lucas.3 

II.    THE  GENERAL  MECHANISMS  OF  EXCITATION  AND 

STIMULATION 

It  was  for  a  long  time  suspected  that  the  nerve  impulse 
is  essentially  an  electrical  phenomenon,  since  the  electrical 

1  Nernst,  W.,  'Zur  Theorie  des  elektrischen  Reizes,'  Arch.},  d.  ges.  Physiol.,  1908, 
122,  275-315;  and  other  papers. 

1  Lillie,  R.  S.,  'The  Relation  of  Stimulation  and  Conduction  in  Irritable  Tissues 
to  Changes  in  the  Permeability  of  the  Limiting  Membranes,'  Amer.  J.  of  Physiol., 
1911,  28,  197-223;  and  other  papers. 

3  Lucas,  K.,  'The  Conduction  of  the  Nervous  Impulse,'  London,  1919.  Also  many 
papers. 

323 


324  LEONARD   THOMPSON  T ROLAND 

action  current  of  a  nerve  provided  the  only  direct  evidence 
of  the  existence  of  the  impulse.  Paradoxically  enough,  this 
index  of  excitation  consists  not  in  the  appearance  of  a  state 
of  electrification  in  the  nerve  but  rather  in  the  partial  dis- 
appearance of  such  a  state  which  is  already  present  in  the 
resting  cell;  and  which  manifests  itself  through  the  'current 
of  rest'  or  'demarcation  current,'  obtained  when  the  cut 
end  or  injured  surface  of  the  nerve  is  connected  through  a 
galvanometer  to  the  nerve  sheath.  The  current  flows  from 
the  sheath  to  the  injured  portion,  indicating  that  the  former 
is  positively  charged  with  respect  to  the  latter.  When  the 
nerve  cell  is  excited  this  positive  electrification  of  the  sheath 
decreases  momentarily.1 

The  electrical  theory  of  matter,  and  in  particular  the 
so-called  theory  of  'electrolytic  dissociation'2  offers  us  the 
materials  for  a  simple  explanation  of  the  resting  electrification 
of  the  nerve.  A  nerve  fiber,  like  almost  any  other  living 
cell,  consists  of  an  aqueous  solution  of  many  substances,  both 
organic  and  inorganic.  Among  these  are  substances  which 
become  ionized  in  solution,  that  is,  their  individual  mole- 
cules are  broken  up  into  electrically  charged  particles,  positive 
and  negative  ones  being  produced  in  equal  numbers.  Promi- 
nent among  ions  of  this  sort  are  to  be  counted  those  of  carbonic 
acid,  the  substance  which  is  produced  by  the  respiratory 
function  of  the  cell.  The  ionic  particles,  in  common  with 
all  of  the  molecules  of  the  cell,  are  endowed  with  a  rapid 
vibratory  motion  which  represents  the  temperature  or 
thermal  energy  of  the  substance.  In  accordance  with  the 
general  theory  of  solutions,  the  motion  of  the  dissolved 
particles  among  the  molecules  of  the  solvent,  water,  resembles 
that  of  the  molecules  of  a  gas  in  free  space.  This  means 
that  they  must  exert  a  pressure  upon  any  surface  which  tends 
to  interfere  with  their  free  diffusion. 

1 A  simple  account  of  the  electrical  phenomena  exhibited  by  nerve  and  muscle 
will  be  found  in  Howell,  VV.  H.,  'A  Text-Book  of  Physiology,'  1909,  Chap.  IV,  pp. 
96-110. 

*  For  a  simple  presentation  of  the  essentials  of  the  modern  electrical  theory  of 
matter,  reference  may  be  made  to  the  book  by  the  writer  and  D.  F.  Comstock,  'The 
Nature  of  Matter  and  Electricity,'  1917.  On  'electrolytic  dissociation'  see  pages 
139-141,  and  on  pressure  due  to  molecular  motion  see  pages  106-109  of  this  work. 


THE  PHYSICAL  BASIS  OF  NERVE  FUNCTIONS  3*5 

The  liquid  mass  of  the  cell  is  contained  within  a  mem- 
brane which  may  be  conceived  as  a  more  or  less  solid  en- 
velope. This  membrane  is  not  necessarily  to  be  identified 
with  the  myelin  sheath  in  the  case  of  the  neYve  fiber,  and  it 
may  simply  consist  in  some  peculiar  condition  of  the  mole- 
cules at  the  surface  of  the  general  cell  mass.  In  general 
the  bounding  surfaces  of  liquid  masses  behave  like  actual 
membranes.  Now  it  is  obvious  that  the  ions  in  the  general 
cell  mass  will  exert  an  outward  pressure  on  this  membrane, 
especially  as  there  is  probably  an  aqueous  medium  outside 
as  well  as  inside  of  the  cell.  If  the  membrane  is  absolutely 
tight  or  impermeable  to  these  ions  there  will  simply  be  a 
tendency  to  distend  it,  but  if  on  the  other  hand  the  membrane 
is  somewhat  porous  certain  of  the  ions  may  pass  through. 
It  is  clear  that  small  ions  will  pass  through  more  readily 
than  large  ones,  and  in  the  case  of  those  of  carbonic  acid  the 
hydrogen  ions  will  almost  certainly  be  the  smaller.  Hydrogen 
is  the  smallest  of  the  atoms  and  its  positive  ion  is  probably 
the  smallest  of  all  known  physical  particles.  If  bare  hydrogen 
ions  occur  in  solution  it  is  probable  that  no  membrane  could 
possibly  exist  which  would  be  capable  of  holding  them  back, 
since  the  membrane  must  itself  have  a  molecular  structure. 
The  carbonate  ions  must  be  very  much  larger  than  the  ions 
of  hydrogen,  not  only  because  they  contain  a  number  of 
atoms  in  combination  instead  of  one,  but  because  the  atoms 
themselves  are  many  times  larger  than  those  of  hydrogen. 
It  is,  therefore,  almost  a  priori  certain  that  if  a  membrane 
is  relatively  impermeable  the  hydrogen  ions  will  still  pass 
through  it,  while  the  carbonate  ions  will  be  held  back. 

Since  the  hydrogen  ions  are  by  nature  positively  charged, 
the  outcome  of  this  selective  diffusion  through  the  cell 
membrane  must  evidently  be  to  form  a  layer  of  positive 
electrical  particles  on  the  outside  of  the  cell.  On  the  inside 
of  the  cell  there  will  be  a  corresponding  layer  of  negative 
particles  which  are  held  in  position  by  the  attraction  exerted 
upon  them  by  the  external  positive  layer.  This  attraction 
is  mutual  and  not  only  causes  the  diffused  positive  ions  to 
remain  in  the  immediate  vicinity  of  the  membrane  but  limits 


326  LEONARD   THOMPSON   TROLAND 

the  number  of  them  which  can  pass  through  the  membrane, 
since  when  their  concentration  on  the  outside  reaches  a  certain 
limit  there  will  be  just  as  many  returning  into  the  cell  per 
unit  time  as  leave  it.  Thus  a  definite  state  of  equilibrium 
is  established  which  involves  an  'electrical  double  layer,'  of  a 
magnitude  depending  upon  the  exact  permeability  of  the 
membrane  and  the  internal  concentration  of  the  ionized 
substance.  The  existence  of  such  an  electrical  double  layer 
at  the  membrane  may  be  said  to  constitute  a  polarization  of 
the  latter,  this  polarization  being  capable  of  variations  in 
degree  under  different  conditions. 

It  is  clear  that  the  polarization  of  the  cell  membrane  just 
considered  explains  the  demarcation  current,  even  the 
direction  of  this  current  corresponding  to  that  theoretically 
deduced.  When  an  electrical  connection  is  made  between 
an  injured  and  an  uninjured  portion  of  a  nerve,  this  con- 
nection is  virtually  established  across  the  cell  membrane  so 
that  the  mechanism  of  the  membrane  acts  in  a  manner 
similar  to  an  electric  'battery.'  The  energy  of  this  'battery' 
is  derived  from  the  compression  of  the  ionized  substance 
inside  of  the  cell,  and  the  continued  flow  of  the  demarcation 
current  must  involve  a  diffusion  of  some  substance,  viz.., 
hydrogen,  through  the  cell  wall.  This  process  is  similar  to 
that  which  occurs  in  the  special  form  of  electrical  'battery' 
known  to  physical  chemists  as  a  'concentration  cell.' 

The  next  problem  which  we  face  is  that  of  determining 
the  mechanism  of  stimulation  of  the  resting  cell.  It  is  a 
familiar  fact  that  an  externally  produced  electric  current  or 
voltage  provides  a  very  ready  means  of  stimulating  nervous 
tissue.  The  great  sensitivity  of  such  tissue  to  electric  cur- 
rents is  by  itself  almost  conclusive  evidence  of  the  essentially 
electrical  nature  of  the  nerve  process.  The  stimulating 
power  of  electrical  currents  depends,  however,  very  radically 
upon  the  exact  time  relations  of  the  current.  An  alternating 
current  of  the  right  frequency  stimulates  more  readily  than  a 
direct  current,  but  if  the  frequency  is  very  high  there  may  be 
no  stimulation  at  all,  even  with  very  large  currents.  It  is 
found  experimentally  that  the  intensity  threshold  for  a  given 


THE  PHYSICAL  BASIS  OF  NERYE  FUNCTIONS  327 

nerve  is  proportional  to  the  square-root  of  the  frequency. 
Nernst1  succeeded  in  explaining  this  relationship  mathe- 
matically on  the  basis  of  an  assumption  as  to  the  physical 
conditions  underlying  the  threshold.  He  supposed  that  in 
order  just  to  stimulate  a  nerve  cell,  the  current  acting  upon 
the  cell  must  polarize  the  cell  membrane  to  a  certain  critical 
degree,  this  polarization  being  a  natural  result  of  a  current 
flow,  which  piles  one  kind  of  ions  up  on  one  side  of  the  mem- 
brane and  draws  them  away  from  the  other  side.  By  com- 
bining this  assumption  with  the  known  laws  of  electrical 
action  and  diffusion  Nernst  arrived  at  a  law  connecting  the 
time  required  to  stimulate  with  the  intensity  of  the  stimulus. 
Although  Hill,2  and  others  have  found  it  necessary  to  com- 
plicate Nernst's  original  theory  by  further  details,  the 
quantitative  success  of  his  original  hypothesis  stands  out 
as  a  unique  achievement  in  the  application  of  mathematical 
physics  to  biological  phenomena. 

It  is  evident,  however,  that  Nernst's  assumption  that  the 
physical  basis  of  the  nerve  threshold  is  the  establishment 
of  a  certain  degree  of  polarization  in  the  cell  membrane  must 
be  modified  to  fit  the  fact  that  the  membrane  is  already 
polarized  before  stimulation.  It  was  pointed  out  by  R.  S. 
Lillie3  that  this  modification  might  take  the  form  of  a  mere 
change  of  algebraic  sign;  in  other  words,  stimulation  of  the 
nerve  may  require  a  critical  ^polarization  of  the  membrane, 
this  depolarization  although  definite  in  amount  not  necessarily 
being  complete.  Lillie  further  pointed  out  that  this  assump- 
tion is  in  harmony  with  many  facts  concerning  conditions  of 
stimulation  of  nervous  tissue.  It  harmonizes  firstly  with 
Pfliiger's  law  of  electrical  stimulation,4  according  to  which 
there  is  stimulation  at  a  negative  pole  (cathode)  upon  closing 
the  circuit  and  at  the  positive  pole  (anode)  upon  opening 
the  circuit,  when  both  of  these  poles  are  applied  to  the 

1  Loc.  cit. 

1  Hill,  A.  V.,  'A  New  Mathematical  Treatment  of  Changes  of  Ionic  Concentration 
in  Muscle  and  Nerve  Under  the  Action  of  Electric  Currents,  with  a  Theory  as  to  their 
Mode  of  Excitation,'  /.  of  Pkysiol.,  1910,  40,  190-225. 

*  Loc.  cit. 

4  For  a  statement  of  Pfliiger's  law  or  laws,  see  Howell,  loc.  cit.,  pp.  89-91. 


328  LEONARD  THOMPSON  TROLAND 

outside  of  the  nerve.  The  cathode  may  be  regarded  as 
spraying  the  nerve  with  electrons,1  which  are  negatively 
charged  and  which  consequently  combine  with  the  positive 
particles  on  the  outside  of  the  nerve,  neutralizing  them  and 
thus  depolarizing  the  membrane.  The  anode,  on  the  other 
hand,  sucks  electrons  away  from  the  outside  of  the  cell, 
thus  increasing  its  coating  of  positive  particles  at  this  point. 
Facts  to  be  considered  below  lead  us  to  suppose  that  under 
these  conditions  the  membrane  will  react  in  such  a  way 
as  to  compensate  for  this  increased  polarization,  so  that  when 
the  circuit  is  opened  and  the  auxiliary  polarizing  force  of 
the  anode  is  removed  a  depolarizing  action  will  occur.  It 
is  a  well  recognized  principle  that  anode  stimulation  at  the 
'break'  occurs  less  readily  than  cathode  stimulation  at  the 
'make.' 

Stimulation  of  nerve  by  many  agents  other  than  the 
electric  current  can  also  be  explained  on  the  assumption  that 
the  essential  condition  of  stimulation  is  a  certain  depolar- 
ization of  the  membrane.  One  way  in  which  to  depolarize 
the  membrane  would  be  to  place  the  cell  in  a  solution  con- 
taining positive  and  negative  ions  very  similar  in  physical 
character  to  those  within  the  cell  itself.  Under  these  con- 
ditions there  would  be  just  as  much  of  a  tendency  for  positive 
ions  to  pass  into  the  cell  as  to  pass  out,  so  that  the  produc- 
tion or  maintenance  of  polarization  by  the  mechanism  of 
selective  diffusion  above  described  would  be  impossible. 
This  explains  the  stimulating  power  of  various  'electrolytes.' 
It  also  explains  why  these  substances,  including  carbonic 
acid,  eventually  bring  about  a  permanent  depression  of 
activity  or  'narcosis'  in  the  nerve. 

Another  method  which  is  obvious  a  priori  for  stimulating 
a  nerve  is  to  injure  or  destroy  the  membrane,  which  depolar- 
izes the  latter  because  negative  as  well  as  positive  ions  are 
permitted  to  diffuse  through  it.  So-called  mechanical  stimu- 
lation of  the  nerve  is  evidently  of  this  sort,  depending  upon  a 
gross  maceration  of  the  cell  envelope.  The  action  of  certain 
organic  narcotics,  such  as  chloroform,  ether,  alcohol,  etc., 

1  Cf.  Comstock  and  Troland,  loc.  cit.,  pp.  24-25. 


THE  PHYSICAL  BASIS  OF  NERVE  FUNCTIONS  329 

which  first  excite  and  then  depress  the  nerve,  probably 
depends  upon  a  chemical  destruction  or  impairment  of  the 
membrane.  The  stimulating  effect  of  other  conditions, 
such  as  desiccation  and  heat,  can  be  explained  in  similar 
terms.1 

III.    THE   SPECIFIC  MECHANISMS  OF  THE  THRESHOLD  IM- 
PULSE PROPAGATION,  AND  OTHER  NEURAL  PROPERTIES 

It  is  evident  that  the  Nernst  theory  of  stimulation  in 
the  modified  form  outlined  by  Lillie  demands  a  'negative 
variation'  of  the  'current  of  rest,'  as  empirically  found, 
since  depolarization  would  necessarily  manifest  itself  in 
this  way.  It  does  not  follow,  however,  from  any  statements 
made  heretofore  that  this  negative  variation  will  be  propa- 
gated along  the  cell  or  fiber  from  the  point  of  stimulation. 
Lillie  has  pointed  out  that  to  explain  propagation  of  the 
variation  we  must  suppose  not  only  that  the  polarization  of 
the  membrane  depends  upon  its  differential  permeability 
but  that  its  relative  impermeability  depends  upon  its  degree 
of  polarization.  Polarization  and  permeability,  in  other 
words,  are  the  two  essential  factors  in  the  nerve  process, 
and  they  are  related  to  one  another  in  the  propagation  of 
the  nerve  impulse  in  a  manner  analogous  to  the  relation 
of  pressure  and  displacement  in  the  propagation  of  sound2 
or  the  relation  of  the  electric  and  magnetic  vectors  in  the 
propagation  of  light.3  These  relations  are  all  such  that  a 
change  in  one  of  the  quantities  always  involves  a  change  in 
the  other,  the  locus  of  the  secondary  change  not  coinciding 
with  or  falling  wholly  inside  of  that  of  the  primary  change. 
This  relation  necessitates  propagation. 

It  is  easy  to  see  why  the  degree  of  polarization  of  the 
nerve  cell  membrane  should  depend  upon  its  degree  of  perme- 
ability, since  it  was  from  assumptions  regarding  the  nature 

1  On  the  various  means  of  exciting  nervous  tissue  see  Schafer's  'Text-Book  of 
Physiology,'  1900,  pp.  459-468. 

*  See,  e.g.,  Duff,  A.  W.,  'A  Text-Book  of  Physics,'  4th  ed.,  pp.  518-519;  or  Poynt- 
ing  and  Thomson,  'A  Text-Book  of  Physics,'  1904,  2,  pp.  12-14. 

3  See,  e.g.,  Houstoun,  R.  A.,  'A  Treatise  on  Light,'  1915,  Chap.  XXII.  This  is  a 
mathematical  exposition;  a  simple,  qualitative  treatment  is  difficult  to  find. 


33°  LEONARD   THOMPSON   TROLAND 

of  this  permeability  that  we  were  enabled  to  deduce  the  exist- 
ence of  polarization.  It  is  not  so  obvious,  however,  why  the 
permeability  of  the  membrane  should  alter  when  some  external 
force,  such  as  an  electric  current,  brings  about  its  depolar- 
ization. A  moment's  consideration,  however,  will  show  that 
such  artificially  produced  depolarization  should  have  some 
effect  upon  the  constitution  of  the  membrane.  When  the 
polarization  is  present  the  substance  of  the  membrane  is 
subjected  to  electrical  stresses  which  are  represented  by 
parallel  lines  of  force  connecting  the  positive  charges  on  the 
outside  of  the  membrane  with  the  negative  charges  on  the 
inside.  In  accordance  with  the  general  electrical  theory  of 
matter  these  electrical  stresses  will  necessarily  produce  some 
distortion  of  the  molecular  or  atomic  structure  of  the  mem- 
brane, which  distortion  will  have  a  direction  determined  by 
the  impressed  electrical  forces.  When  these  forces  are 
removed  by  depolarization  this  distortion  will  tend  to  dis- 
appear. The  distortion  may  well  be  of  such  a  character  as 
to  render  the  membrane  less  permeable  than  would  be  the 
case  if  such  distortion  were  absent.  In  this  event,  the 
depolarization  would  have  the  effect  of  increasing  the  perme- 
ability. 

One  conception  of  the  molecular  structure  of  the  membrane 
which  has  occurred  to  me,  pictures  the  membrane  molecules 
as  being  considerably  longer  than  they  are  wide,  with  opposite 
electrical  charges  on  either  side  in  the  middle  of  the  molecular 
length.  The  individual  molecules  are  conceived  to  be 
rotatable,  like  compass  needles,  about  their  centers  of  mass. 
The  electrical  field  produced  by  the  polarization  will  then 
tend  to  dispose  all  of  these  molecules  with  their  long  axes 
at  right  angles  to  the  field,  that  is  parallel  to  the  plane  of 
the  membrane,  and  in  this  position  they  will  offer  maximal 
obstruction  to  any  particles  tending  to  move  perpendicular 
to  this  direction.  When  the  depolarization  field  is  removed, 
however,  the  molecules  will  tend  to  swing  into  position  at 
right  angles  to  the  one  just  considered,  on  account  of  the 
mutual  attractions  and  repulsions  of  their  charges.  In  this 
position  they  will  offer  much  less  resistance  to  the  passage 


THE  PHYSICAL  BASIS  OF  NERVE  FUNCTIONS  33 l 

of  particles  perpendicular  to  the  plane  of  the  membrane. 
This  mechanism  is  of  course  only  symbolic,  but  illustrates 
the  general  principles  which  are  involved. 

Apart  from  purely  physical  reasoning,  we  have  excellent 
biological  grounds  for  believing  that  stimulation  of  a  living 
cell  will  result  in  an  increased  permeability  of  its  enveloping 
membrane.  It  is  through  modifications  in  the  permeability 
of  this  membrane  that  the  cell  regulates  the  income  and 
outgo  of  chemical  materials.  Food  substances  absorbed 
from  the  environment  and  waste  products  excreted  must  pass 
through  the  membrane,  and  it  is  to  be  expected  that  both  of 
these  transfers  of  substance  will  be  increased  during  a  state 
of  excitation  of  the  cell,  since  this  latter  state  involves  an 
increased  chemical  activity.  Lillie  has  cited  a  number  of 
cases  in  which  an  increased  permeability  of  the  cell  mem- 
brane resulting  from  stimulation  can  be  clearly  demonstrated. 
The  recent  work  of  Tashiro  on  the  liberation  of  carbon 
dioxide  by  stimulated  nerve  fibers  is  evidence  in  the  same 
direction,  and  also  corroborates  the  idea  that  the  ions  which 
are  involved  in  the  polarization  of  the  nerve  cell  membrane 
are  those  of  carbonic  acid. 

Tashiro1  finds  that  a  small  amount  of  carbon  dioxide  is 
given  off  by  the  nerve  fiber  even  in  the  resting  state  but  that 
this  amount  is  markedly  increased  during  stimulation. 
This  indicates  that  the  normal  permeability  of  the  mem- 
brane is  such  as  to  permit  a  slight  diffusion  of  carbonate  ions 
and  that  the  depolarization  accompanying  excitation  is  the 
result  of  an  increased  permeability  to  these  ions  rather  than  a 
decreased  permeability  to  the  positive  hydrogen  ioqs.  Our 
initial  theory  regarding  the  cause  of  the  polarization  of  the 
cell  membrane  demands  that  an  increase  in  the  permeability 
should  result  in  a  decrease  in  the  polarization  provided  the 
permeability  is  already  practically  perfect  for  the  positive 
ions.  That  this  requirement  is  fulfilled  is  indicated  not 
only  by  the  slight  diffusion  of  carbon  dioxide  during  the 
resting  state  but  also  by  the  free  permeability  of  the  mem- 
brane at  all  times  to  water  and  the  ions  of  water. 

1  Tashiro,  S.,  'Carbon  Dioxide  Production  from  Nerve  Fibers  when  Resting  and 
when  Stimulated,'  Amtr.  J.  of  Physiol.,  1913,  32,  107-136. 


33 2  LEONARD   THOMPSON  T ROLAND 

The  facts  which  we  have  just  been  considering  show  that 
the  reciprocal  relationship  between  permeability  and  polari- 
zation is  a  mutual  or  'symmetrical'  one.  In  other  words, 
these  facts  prove  that  a  decrease  in  polarization  beyond  a 
certain  critical  point  results  in  an  increase  in  permeability. 
The  analogy  between  the  principles  of  propagation  of  nervous 
energy  and  those  of  acoustic  and  radiant  energy  is  thus  very 
close,  a  change  in  either  one  of  the  two  principal  variables 
resulting  in  a  reverse  change  in  the  other  variable.  The 
reciprocal  relationship  between  these  two  factors  in  the 
case  of  the  nerve  impulse  is  not,  however,  absolutely  sym- 
metrical. It  is  almost  certain  that  any  initial  change,  no 
matter  how  small,  of  the  permeability  will  result  in  a  reverse 
change  of  the  polarization,  but  the  fact  of  the  threshold 
indicates  that  an  alteration  of  the  polarization  does  not 
bring  about  an  increase  in  the  permeability  until  a  certain 
critical  depolarization  has  been  developed.  Indeed  certain 
phenomena  which  we  shall  soon  consider  indicate  that  before 
this  critical  point  is  reached,  there  is  a  tendency  for  the 
permeability  of  the  membrane  to  decrease  below  normal  as  a 
result  of  depolarization.  The  polarization  and  the  perme- 
ability of  the  membrane  appear  to  enter  into  a  system  in 
which  there  is  a  point  of  unstable  equilibrium. 

The  nature  of  this  system  can  be  illustrated  by  a  mechani- 
cal analogy  which  is  effective  as  a  classroom  demonstration. 
Suppose  that  we  tip  a  chair  gradually  forward  by  applying  a 
finger  to  the  back  of  the  chair.  At  first  the  weight  of  the 
chair  resists  the  tipping  force,  but  when  the  center  of  gravity 
passes  over  the  very  small  base  of  support  the  chair  parts 
company  with  the  finger  and  falls  to  the  floor  with  a  crash. 
The  tipping  of  the  chair  up  to  the  point  of  unstable  equi- 
librium represents  the  changes  in  the  character  of  the  mem- 
brane system  which  must  be  produced  in  order  to  pass  the 
threshold,  while  the  crashing  of  the  chair  to  the  floor,  once 
the  equilibrium  point  has  been  passed,  represents  the  libera- 
tion of  the  internal  energies  of  the  nerve  cell  which  constitutes 
the  state  of  excitation.  The  degree  of  energy  thus  liberated 
is  evidently  dependent  almost  wholly  upon  the  inherent 


THE  PHYSICAL  BASIS  OF  NERFE  FUNCTIONS  333 

nature  of  the  system  and  not  upon  the  intensity  of  the 
stimulus  or  tipping  force. 

The  laws  of  the  nerve  membrane  system,  formulated  in 
more  exact  terms,  would  probably  read  somewhat  as  follows. 
An  increase  in  permeability  always  produces  a  decrease  in 
polarization.  An  initial  decrease  of  polarization,  however, 
first  results  in  a  decrease  in  permeability  which  tends  to 
compensate  for  the  initial  change.  But  if  the  depolarization 
reaches  a  critical  or  threshold  amount  the  'sign'  of  the 
change  is  reversed,  so  that  an  increase  in  permeability  results. 
As  soon  as  this  increase  begins,  the  initial  depolarization  is 
further  augmented  by  the  law  which  makes  polarization 
depend  reciprocally  upon  permeability,  so  that  the  equi- 
librium of  the  nerve  membrane  system  is  completely  upset, 
the  polarization  now  decreasing  to  a  minimum  while  the 
permeability  increases  to  a  maximum. 

The  supposition  that  the  first  reaction  of  the  membrane 
to  a  decrease  in  polarization  is  a  decrease  in  the  permeability 
rather  than  an  increase  is  in  harmony  with  a  variety  of 
facts  concerning  the  nerve  function.  It  explains  among 
other  things  DuBois-Reymond's  law  of  electrical  nerve 
stimulation,  according  to  which  a  nerve  is  stimulated  only 
by  a  change  in  an  electrical  current  and  not  by  a  steady  flow 
of  electricity.  The  investigations  of  Waller,1  Hill,2  Lapicque3 
and  others  have  shown  that  there  is  a  certain  rate  of  appli- 
cation of  an  electrical  voltage  which  stimulates  the  nerve 
with  the  least  total  expenditure  of  energy.  The  failure  of 
a  slowly  applied  electric  voltage  to  stimulate — at  the  cathode 
—can  be  understood  if  the  first  action  of  the  membrane 
is  in  the  direction  of  adaptation  or  compensation,  the  mech- 
anism of  which  involves  a  decrease  of  the  permeability 
below  normal;  thus  tending  to  increase  the  polarization 
above  normal  or  to  maintain  it  at  normal  in  the  face  of  an 
external  depolarizing  agency.  Such  an  action  is  evidently 
a  physical  possibility  if,  as  we  have  found  reason  above  to 

1  Waller,  A.  D.,  'The  Characteristic  of  Nerve,'  Proc.  Roy.  Soc.,  1899,  65,  207-222. 

1  Loc.  cit. 

^  *  See  Lapicque  L.,  and  Legendre,  R.,  'Relation  entre  le  diametre  des  fibres  ner- 
veuses  et  leur  rapidite  fontionnelle,  Comptes  rendus,  1913,  157,  1163-1165. 


334  LEONARD  THOMPSON  TROLAND 

suppose,  the  normal  permeability  does  not  completely  inter- 
fere with  the  diffusion  of  the  negative  ions  but  simply  impedes 
their  movement  to  a  certain  degree.  If  the  external  de- 
polarizing agency  is  applied  very  rapidly  the  membrane  does 
not  have  time  to  develop  its  compensating  reaction,  so  that 
the  threshold  depolarization  is  reached  and  excitation  results. 

We  have  seen  that  the  'break'  stimulation  at  the  anode 
is  best  explained  on  the  assumption  that  the  membrane 
tends  to  compensate  for  the  excess  of  positive  ions  at  the 
anode  by  decreasing  its  permeability  at  this  point.  This 
is  apparently  another  instance  of  the  general  tendency  of 
the  membrane  to  adapt  itself  to  a  stimulus  by  permeability 
changes  so  as  to  maintain  the  resultant  polarization  constant. 
Stimulation  at  the  anode  upon  interruption  of  the  current 
will  result  only  if  this  interruption  is  sufficiently  quick,  since 
if  it  is  slow  the  membrane  will  have  time  to  compensate  again 
and  the  resultant  change  in  the  polarization  will  be  insufficient 
to  cause  stimulation. 

These  views  regarding  the  changes  in  the  condition  of  the 
membrane  at  the  cathode  and  anode  respectively  should 
lead  us  to  look  for  some  further  specific  effects  of  such  modi- 
fications. The  phenomena  of  'electro-tonus'1  are  of  this 
sort.  It  is  to  be  anticipated  that  the  stimulability,  or  the 
stimulation  threshold,  of  the  nerve-  will  depend  upon  the 
condition  of  the  membrane,  in  particular  upon  the  dynamics 
of  the  equilibrium  between  its  permeability  and  its  polariza- 
tion, so  that  a  compensating  change  in  the  permeability  will 
result  in  an  alteration  of  the  threshold.  It  is  a  familiar  fact 
that  the  stimulation  threshold  decreases  at  a  cathode  while 
it  increases  at  an  anode,  indicating  in  terms  of  our  theory 
that  decreasecl  permeability  results  in  increased  stimulability 
and  vice  versa. 

The  above  deductions  are  further  borne  out  by  a  study 
of  the  alterations  in  stimulability  which  take  place  during  and 
after  any  given  process  of  excitation  in  the  nerve  fiber.  It 
is  well  known  that  after  such  a  fiber  has  once  been  stimulated 
it  cannot  again  be  set  into  excitation  until  a  certain  interval 

1  See  Howell,  he.  cit.,  pp.  88-89. 


THE  PHYSICAL  BASIS  OF  NERyE  FUNCTIONS  335 

has  elapsed,  this  interval  being  called  that  of  refractory 
phase.1  Refractory  phase  is  evidently  represented  in  our 
physical  hypotheses  by  the  state  of  collapse  of  the  membrane 
which  results  from  the  attainment  of  the  threshold  depolar- 
ization. If  excitation  consists  in  an  increase  of  permeability 
to  a  maximum,  then  it  is  clear  that  further  excitation  is 
impossible  until  the  original  impermeability  has  been  at 
least  partially  restored.  So  long  as  no  restoration  whatever 
has  occurred  the  cell  remains  in  what  is  known  as  absolute 
refractory  phase. 

The  fact  that  this  condition  is  only  temporary  proves  that 
a  mechanism  of  restoration  of  the  normal  condition  of  the 
membrane  exists,  this  mechanism  probably  being  identical 
with  that  which  enables  the  membrane  to  react  in  a  com- 
pensating manner  to  small  depolarizing  forces.  The  recovery 
is  gradual  and  while  it  is  in  progress  the  cell  is  in  a  so-called 
state  of  relative  refractory  phase.  In  this  condition  its 
stimulability  is  depressed  below  normal  to  a  degree  which 
is  greater  the  less  the  recovery  which  has  been  achieved  at 
any  instant.  Since  the  recovery  must  consist  essentially 
in  a  progressive  decrease  in  the  permeability  of  the  membrane 
these  facts  evidently  correspond  with  the  view  that  stimula- 
bility is  inversely  proportional  to  the  permeability  in  question 
or  that  the  threshold  of  stimulation  is  directly  proportional 
to  it. 

It  is  an  empirical  finding  that  the  relative  refractory 
phase  is  followed  by  a  phase  of  hyper-excitability  during  which 
the  threshold  of  stimulation  is  lower  than  normal.  This 
effect  can  evidently  be  attributed  to  an  'over-shooting'  of 
the  permeability  decrease  which  constitutes  the  recovery  of 
the  membrane.  Such  'over-shooting,'  according  to  our 
assumptions,  should  be  accompanied  by  an  increase  in  the 
stimulability  of  the  nerve  above  that  obtaining  in  the  normal 
condition.  The  'over-shooting'  may  be  viewed  as  a  delayed 
consequence  of  forces  of  compensation  set  into  action  by 
the  initial  operation  of  the  stimulus. 

1  On  refractory  phase  and  the  course  of  excitability  after  stimulation,  in  general, 
consult  Bayliss,  W.,  'Principles  of  General  Physiology,'  1915,  pp.  389-390. 


33  6  LEONARD  THOMPSON   T ROLAND 

The  above  considerations  are  evidently  in  harmony  with 
the  facts  which  indicate  that  a  nerve  impulse  set  up  during  a 
state  of  refractory  phase  has  a  smaller  amplitude  or  intensity 
than  a  normal  impulse,  while  one  which  is  generated  in  a 
phase  of  hyper-excitability  possesses  an  amplitude  or  in- 
tensity greater  than  normal.  The  'amplitude'  of  a  nerve 
impulse  must  stand  either  for  the  amount  of  change  in 
permeability  which  results  from  stimulation  or  for  the 
amount  of  depolarization  which  is  a  consequence  of  this 
change.  It  should  be  clear  why  these  amplitudes  vary  with 
the  exact  level  of  permeability  which  exists  at  the  instant 
of  stimulation.  If  a  nerve  impulse  is  represented  as  a  wave 
of  permeability  change  referred  to  normal  permeability  as  a 
base  line  it  is  evident  that  a  decreased  amplitude  is  repre- 
sented by  an  elevation  of  the  troughs  of  the  waves  above 
the  base  line,  whereas  an  increased  amplitude  must  be 
referred  to  a  depression  of  these  troughs  below  this  line. 
The  'all  or  none'  principle,  which  we  shall  consider  more 
specifically  below,  may  be  interpreted  as  to  mean  that  the 
crests  of  all  waves  lie  on  a  constant  locus  which  represents 
the  invariable  maximum  permeability  of  the  membrane. 

IV.  THE  ENERGETICS  OF  NERVE  PROCESSES 
It  is  almost  a  necessary  consequence  of  the  above  out- 
lined theory  of  the  physical  nature  of  nervous  activity  that 
such  activity  should  involve  metabolism.  It  seems  almost 
inevitable  that  the  process  of  restoring  the  nerve  membrane 
to  its  rest  condition  after  excitation  should  require  the 
expenditure  of  new  energy.  This  energy  would  naturally 
be  obtained  by  the  oxidation  of  some  substance  present  in 
the  cell.  It  is' a  fact  that  oxygen  is  required  in  order  to  main- 
tain the  nerve  in  a  state  of  excitability.  A  nerve  which  is 
caused  to  function  in  the  absence  of  oxygen  eventually  falls 
into  a  state  of  permanent  refractory  phase,  exactly  what 
would  be  expected  if  oxygen  is  necessary  in  order  to  rebuild 
the  membrane. 

It  is  a  remarkable  fact  that  although  oxygen  is  required 
in  the  nerve  function  there  is  apparently  no  generation  of 


THE  PHYSICAL  BASIS  OF  NEWE  FUNCTIONS  337 

heat  due  to  the  activity  of  the  nerve.1  Very  sensitive  heat 
detecting  instruments  capable  of  recording  the  heat  pro- 
duced by  the  oxidation  of  a  single  molecule  in  a  portion  of 
space  easily  visible  under  the  microscope  have  failed  to 
indicate  any  heat  production  whatsoever.  This  fact  has 
led  some  investigators  to  believe  that  the  oxygen  is  not 
required  for  metabolic  purposes  but  has  some  other  function, 
such  as  one  of  catalysis.  They  do  not  make  clear,  however, 
why  in  a  non-metabolic  function  the  oxygen  should  require 
constantly  to  be  replenished.  The  idea  that  the  oxidation 
actually  is  employed  in  an  oxidative  process  may  possibly 
be  reconciled  with  the  absence  of  heat  production  in  the 
following  way.  The  process  of  excitation,  according  to  the 
theory  herein  considered,  involves  a  diffusion  of  carbonic 
acid  through  the  cell  membrane  and  this  diffusion,  being  of 
the  general  nature  of  evaporation,  should  have  a  cooling 
effect  upon  the  cell.  This  effect  is  immediately  followed 
by  the  oxidative  change,  and  the  heat  generated  by  this 
latter  change  may  be  only  just  sufficient  to  counteract  the 
cooling  produced  by  the  diffusion.  It  would  be  quite  reason- 
able to  suppose  that  these  two  quantities  would  almost 
exactly  neutralize  each  other,  owing  to  the  generally  cyclic 
nature  of  the  process. 

The  apparent  indefatigability  of  nerve  tissue  is  probably 
a  consequence  of  the  fact  that  only  a  very  small  amount  of 
energy  is  required  in  the  nerve  function,  so  that  the  substance 
of  the  nerve  cell  can  supply  this  energy  by  oxidation  during  a 
very  long  period.  It  is  clear  that  the  oxidation  which  we 
have  assumed  to  occur  in  the  rebuilding  of  the  cell  membrane 
will  tend  to  compensate  for  the  loss  of  carbon  dioxide  from 
the  cell  which  occurs  during  excitation,  so  that  fatigue  will 
set  in  only  when  the  fundamental  oxidizable  material  of  the 
cell  is  exhausted.  In  vivo  this  substance  will  naturally  be 
replenished,  while  in  vitro  the  nerve  becomes  unfit  for  experi- 
mental tests  due  to  other  causes,  such  as  desiccation,  long 
before  its  metabolic  fuel  is  exhausted. 

Some  views  of  the   nature  of  the   nerve  impulse   have 

1  On  these  points,  cf.  Bayliss,  loc.  cit.,  pp.  378-379  and  390-391. 


338  LEONARD   THOMPSON  TROLAND 

apparently  regarded  it  as  a  true  cyclic  process  in  the  thermo- 
dynamic  sense.1  Such  a  process,  resembling  the  propagation 
of  light  in  free  space  or  of  sound  in  a  perfectly  elastic  medium, 
would  involve  no  loss  or  gain  of  energy  at  any  point,  the 
original  energy  of  the  stimulus  simply  being  transmitted 
from  one  part  of  space  to  another.  It  is  inconceivable, 
however,  that  all  cases  of  nerve  functioning  should  be  thermo- 
dynamically  cyclic.  The  original  process  of  stimulation 
apparently  does  not  consist  simply  in  an  absorption  of  the 
energy  of  the  stimulus  by  the  nerve;  on  the  contrary,  the 
stimulus  apparently  serves  merely  to  operate  a  trigger  which 
releases  energies  latent  in  the  nerve  itself.  Moreover,  if 
propagation  depends  simply  on  the  principle  that  one  portion 
of  the  nerve  can  be  stimulated  by  the  excitatory  state  of  an 
adjoining  portion,  it  is  natural  to  suppose  that  this  trigger 
process  is  repeated  at  all  points  in  the  nerve  during  the 
propagation  of  the  impulse. 

It  is,  of  course,  conceivable  that  the  energy  released  at 
the  point  of  stimulation  is  simply  passed  along  the  nerve 
during  the  propagation  without  involving  any  further 
expenditure  or  release  of  energy.  There  are  certain  cases  of 
propagation,  however,  to  which  this  supposition  can  scarcely 
apply.  One  of  these  is  propagation  through  a  so-called 
*  region  of  decrement'  in  which  the  amplitude  of  the  nerve 
impulse  suffers  a  progressive  diminution,  but  one  which  is 
completely  recovered  from  when  the  impulse  emerges  from 
the  region  in  question.  We  must  suppose  that  the  reduction 
of  the  amplitude  of  the  impulse  in  such  a  region  involves  a 
loss  of  energy,  and  the  restoration  of  the  impulse  to  its 
original  magnitude  when  it  passes  out  of  a  region  of  decrement 
must  involve  the  expenditure  of  new  energy.  Conduction 
through  synapses  apparently  involves  processes  of  the  same 
general  character. 

Other  reasons  for  refusing  to  believe  that  the  nerve 
impulse  is  thermodynamically  cyclic  lie  in  the  metabolic 
character  of  all  other  vital  activities  and  in  the  nature  of 

1  On  the  nature  of  a  thermodynamically  cyclic  process  consult  Lewis,  W.  C.  McC., 
'A  System  of  Physical  Chemistry,'  1916,  Vol.  2,  pp.  29  ff. 


THE  PHYSICAL  BASIS  OF  NERVE  FUNCTIONS  339 

the  specific  physical  mechanism  which  we  now  believe  is 
involved  in  the  nerve  process.  This  mechanism  requires  a 
change  in  the  structure  of  the  physical  substance  of  the 
nerve  membrane,  a  re-arrangement  of  its  constituent  atoms 
or  molecules,  and  such  changes  always  involve  a  degradation 
of  energy.  Nervous  tissue  undoubtedly  has  a  lower  degree 
of  metabolism  than  any  other  living  tissue,  but  this  is  not 
equivalent  to  saying  that  its  metabolism  is  zero. 

V.     THE  BASIS  OF  THE  ALL-OR-NONE  PRINCIPLE 

Modern  studies,  mainly  those  of  Lucas  and  Adrian,1  have 
made  it  quite  clear  that  the  action  of  the  individual  nerve 
fiber  follows  a  principle  of  'all  or  none.'  If  a  nerve  cell  is 
set  into  excitation  at  all  its  excitation  is  ipso  facto  the  greatest 
which  is  normally  possible  for  it.  A  stimulus  of  the  highest 
intensity  can  cause  no  greater  response  than  one  of  threshold 
intensity.  The  experimental  demonstration  of  the  validity 
of  this  principle  for  the  individual  nerve  fiber  has  involved 
work  of  a  very  intricate  and  ingenious  kind,  but  on  the 
theoretical  side  it  requires  very  little  effort  to  see  that  the 
response  of  nervous  tissue  should  be  of  the  'all  or  none' 
type.  If  what  the  stimulus  does  is  to  upset  a  condition  of 
unstable  equilibrium  in  the  nerve  membrane,  the  response  of 
the  nerve  must  depend  upon  its  own  inherent  nature  and  not 
upon  that  of  the  stimulus.  The  old  'train  of  gunpowder' 
analogy  for  the  nerve  impulse  involved  an  'all  or  none' 
action,  and  the  modern  substitute  for  this  classical  mechanism 
makes  the  same  theoretical  demands. 

It  is  interesting  to  note  that  the  'all  or  none'  principle 
as  applied  to  nerve  activity  forces  us  to  think  of  such  activity 
in  terms  of  fixed  units  of  energy,  so  that  we  have  a  system 
somewhat  resembling  that  necessitated  by  the  modern 
quantum  theory  of  radiation.2  The  nerve  process  is  quantal, 
or  to  use  a  more  biological  term,  it  is  isobolic.  The  concep- 
tions of  atomism  and  discontinuity  seem  to  be  creeping  into 
every  branch  of  scientific  analysis;  not  only  are  the  chemical 

1  See  Lucas,  loc.  cit. 

*  See  Comstock  and  Troland,  loc.  cit.,  pp.  46-49  and  182-189. 


34°  LEONARD   THOMPSON   TROLAND 

elements  atomic  but  also  electricity,  light,  the  determinants 
of  heredity,  and  finally  the  activities  of  nerve  and  muscle. 

The  acceptance  of  the  'all  or  none'  principle  for  nerve 
action  does  not,  however,  imply  that  all  nerve  impulses  are 
of  the  same  magnitude.  The  magnitude  or  amplitude  of  a 
nerve  impulse  depends  upon  the  characteristics  of  the  nerve 
substance  in  which  it  occurs.  These  characteristics  differ 
for  different  nerve  fibers  in  their  normal  condition  and  for  a 
single  fiber  in  various  abnormal,  subnormal  and  super- 
normal conditions.  They  are  different  at  synapses  from 
what  they  are  in  the  non-synaptic  portions  of  the  nerve. 

In  general,  however,  variations  in  the  quantity  of  nervous 
energy  transmitted  along  a  given  nerve  in  unit  time  must  be 
conceived  to  depend  upon  the  number  of  impulses  or  neural 
quanta  which  pass  through  a  cross-section  of  the  nerve  during 
the  time  in  question.  This  number  is  the  nerve  impulse 
frequency,  and  there  cannot  be  the  slightest  doubt  that  the 
concept  of  impulse  frequency  is  an  absolutely  fundamental 
one  for  the  theory  of  nerve  action.  It  is  probably  as  im- 
portant for  the  understanding  of  such  action  as  is  that  of 
wave-length  for  the  understanding  of  radiation  phenomena. 
However,  the  characteristics  of  a  given  nerve  current  are 
not  completely  determined  by  a  specification  of  its  frequency, 
since  the  amplitude,  the  length  and  the  form  of  the  individual 
nerve  pulse  are  not  determined  by  frequency,  although  they 
may  serve  to  limit  the  latter. 

VI.     THE  MECHANISM  OF  THE  SYNAPSE 

Facts  summarized  in  a  masterly  way  by  Sherrington1 
indicate  that  nerve  conduction  through  a  reflex  arc  differs 
radically  from  conduction  between  two  points  in  a  single 
nerve  fiber.  A  reflex  arc  always  involves  one  or  more  synapses 
and  all  of  the  evidence  points  to  the  synapse  as  the  locus 
of  the  factors  which  differentiate  reflex  arc  conduction  from 
simple  nerve  fiber  conduction.  Certain  experiments  of 
Lucas2  provide  us  with  facts  which  make  it  easy  to  construct 

1  Sherrington,  C.  S.,  'The  Integrative  Action  of  the  Nervous  System,'  1911,  pp. 

I4/ 

2  Loc.  cit.,  pp.  17-22. 


THE  PHYSICAL  BASIS  OF  NERVE  FUNCTIONS  34 ' 

a  theory  of  the  nature  of  the  synapse.  These  experiments 
relate  to  the  conduction  of  the  nerve  impulse  through  a  so- 
called  'region  of  decrement/  Such  a  region  is  provided  by  a 
stretch  of  nerve  fiber  which  has  been  narcotized,  that  is, 
which  has  been  subjected  to  the  action  of  a  narcotic,  e.g., 
alcohol.  An  impulse  in  passing  through  a  narcotized  stretch 
of  fiber  decreases  progressively  in  amplitude,  the  total 
decrease  being  proportional  to  the  length  of  narcotized  fiber 
through  which  it  has  passed.  If  the  narcosis  is  sufficiently 
deep  or  the  length  of  the  region  sufficiently  great,  the  reduc- 
tion of  the  impulse  amplitude  may  be  such  as  completely 
to  extinguish  it.  If,  however,  the  reduction  does  not  carry 
the  amplitude  below  a  certain  critical  or  threshold  magnitude 
the  impulse,  upon  emerging  from  the  narcotized  stretch, 
regains  its  normal  amplitude  and  continues  as  if  it  had  not 
passed  through  the  narcotized  region  at  all. 

All  of  the  evidence  at  hand  points  to  the  view  that  the 
action  of  a  narcotic  on  a  nerve  cell  consists  essentially  in  a 
permanent  increase  of  the  permeability  of  the  cell  membrane, 
a  physical  state  resembling  that  of  refractory  phase.  Nar- 
cotics are  apparently  membrane  destroyers  and  the  depth 
of  the  narcosis  is  represented  physically  by  the  extent  to 
which  the  membrane  has  been  injured  or  made  permeable. 
That  this  is  a  correct  picture  of  the  state  of  affairs  in  a 
narcotized  region  is  indicated  by  the  fact  that  such  a  region 
is  electrically  negative  with  respect  to  a  non-narcotized 
portion  of  the  nerve.  It  is  also  shown  by  the  fact  that 
narcotic  substances,  alcohol,  chloroform,  ether,  etc.,  in 
general  increase  the  diffusion  of  materials  through  the  cell 
boundaries.  The  exact  physical  basis  of  'conduction  with  a 
decrement,'  however,  is  less  easy  to  picture.  Such  conduction 
apparently  demands  that  the  degree  of  response  of  one  por- 
tion of  the  nerve  fiber  should  depend  upon  the  intensity  of 
the  stimulus  supplied  by  an  adjoining  portion.  In  other 
words,  in  a  region  of  decrement  the  self  excitation  of  a  nerve 
fiber  does  not  follow  the  'all  or  none'  principle.  At  present  I 
see  no  plausible  explanation  of  this  change  in  law. 

It  will  be  recalled  that  if  a  nerve  is  restimulated  during 


342  LEONARD  THOMPSON  TROLAND  * 

the  relative  refractory  phase  an  impulse  is  generated  which 
has  an  amplitude  less  than  normal,  while  if  it  is  restimulated 
during  the  phase  of  hyper-excitability  the  resulting  impulse 
has  an  amplitude  greater  than  normal.  The  experiments 
of  Lucas  show  that  the  ability  of  the  nerve  impulse  to  pass 
through  a  region  of  decrement  without  being  extinguished 
depends  upon  its  initial  amplitude.  A  normal  impulse  may 
pass  successfully  while  a  subnormal  one  generated  during 
relative  refractory  phase  may  fail  to  pass.  In  another  case, 
both  normal  and  subnormal  impulses  may  fail  while  one  of 
supernormal  amplitude  generated  during  a  phase  of  hyper- 
excitability  may  succeed.  These  facts  are  employed  by 
Lucas  to  explain  inhibition  and  summation  on  the  assump- 
tion that  synapses,  in  connection  with  which  these  two  pro- 
cesses are  most  commonly  found,  are  actually  regions  of 
decrement.  A  synapse,  according  to  this  view,  is  a  naturally 
narcotized  or  auto-intoxicated  portion  of  the  nerve  circuit. 
The  so-called  'resistance'  of  the  synapse  is  an  expression  of 
this  condition.  The  'resistance'  is  really  a  'leakage,'  but 
owing  to  the  'all  or  none'  character  of  the  nerve  function 
the  resistance  cannot  permanently  lower  the  intensity  of 
individual  pulses  but  can  only  determine  whether  a  pulse 
will  pass  through  the  synapse  or  not.  The  success  or  failure 
of  a  pulse  in  attempting  to  pass  through  a  synapse  will 
depend  upon  its  initial  amplitude  and  upon  the  depth  of 
auto-narcosis  of  the  synapse.  • 

It  is  clear  that  if  the  individual  impulses  reaching  a 
synapse  are  separated  by  distances  so  great  that  the  con- 
dition of  the  nerve  is  restored  to  normal  between  each  suc- 
cessive impulse,  the  frequency  of  the  pulses  can  affect  their 
ability  to  penetrate  the  synapse  only  by  some  accumulation 
of  effects  in  the  synapse  itself.  However,  if  the  frequency  is 
sufficiently  high  so  that  one  impulse  falls  in  the  phase  of 
hyper-excitability  of  the  preceding  impulse,  then  this  in- 
creased frequency  will  aid  the  nerve  current  to  pass  through 
the  synapse.  A  further  increase  in  frequency,  however, 
which  causes  one  impulse  to  fall  in  the  relative  refractory 
phase  of  the  preceding  one,  will  render  the  nerve  current 


THE  PHYSICAL  BASIS  OF  NERPE  FUNCTIONS  343 

less  able  than  normal  to  penetrate  the  synapse.  In  case 
the  synapse  is  of  such  a  'resistance'  that  only  supernormal 
impulses  can  pass  through  there  will  be  a  relatively  narrow 
range  of  nerve  frequencies  which  will  be  capable  of  being 
conducted  through  the  nervous  arc,  and  the  law  governing 
the  relation  of  conductibility  to  frequency  will  be  similar 
to  that  of  resonance,  since  impulse  frequencies  both  higher 
and  lower  than  the  available  range  will  fail  entirely.  If, 
on  the  other  hand,  normal  impulses  are  conducted,  nerve 
currents  of  all  frequencies  up  to  a  certain  critical  frequency 
will  pass  the  synapse  but  above  this  frequency  there  will  be  a 
complete  block. 

Adrian1  makes  it  clear  that  these  principles  are  adequate 
to  explain  many  of  the  facts  of  inhibition  as  well  as  of  sum- 
mation. An  increase  in  the  frequency  of  any  impulse  above  a 
certain  critical  value  will  evidently  result  in  the  inhibition 
of  this  impulse  and  any  process  depending  upon  it,  provided  a 
synapse  is  involved  in  the  nerve  circuit.  Inhibition  of  one 
nerve  current  by  another  may  occur  if  the  second  current 
impinges  upon  the  same  synapse  as  the  first  one  and  is  of  a 
sufficiently  high  frequency.  If  two  currents  of  different 
frequencies  combine,  the  resultant  current  must  have  a 
frequency  at  least  as  high  as  that  of  the  highest  component, 
and  if  the  synapse  blocks  the  high  frequency  component  it 
will  also  block  the  low  frequency  one.  This  explanation  of 
inhibition  is  clearly  in  harmony  with  the  effects  produced  by 
strychnine,  rabies,  tetanus  toxin,  calcium  salts,  and  other 
similar  agents  upon  the  nervous  system,  if  we  suppose  that 
these  agents  decrease  the  permeability  of  the  nerve  membrane 
below  normal  or  act  in  a  direction  opposite  to  that  of  nar- 
cotics. Upon  this  assumption  strychnine  would  tend  to 
obliterate  synapses,  in  the  physiological  sense  of  the  term; 
regions  of  decrement  would  be  wiped  out,  and  consequently 
all  nerve  impulses  of  whatever  frequency  would  be  trans- 
mitted. Inhibitions  would  be  converted  into  excitations  and 
the  slightest  stimulus  would  set  the  entire  nervous  system 
into  action.  It  will  be  recalled  that  previously  we  have 

1  In  the  final  chapter  of  Lucas's  book,  already  quoted. 


344  LEONARD    THOMPSON  TROLAND 

associated  hyper-excitability  with  a  decrease  in  the  perme- 
ability of  the  nerve  membrane  below  normal.  The  converse 
fact  that  narcotics  acting  upon  the  nervous  system  "as  a 
whole  tend  to  convert  excitations  into  inhibitions  is  also 
clearly  in  harmony  with  the  given  account  of  the  synaptic 
function. 

It  is  improbable,  however,  that  the  mechanisms  of  sum- 
mation and  of  inhibition  proposed  by  Adrian  and  Lucas  on 
the  basis  of  their  study  of  conduction  through  regions  of 
decrement  are  the  whole  story.  Nevertheless  most  of  the 
differences  between  reflex  arc  and  nerve  trunk  conduction 
can  be  accounted  for  if  we  suppose  the  synapse  to  have  a 
mechanism  not  differing  qualitatively  from  that  of  the  plain 
nerve  fiber  membrane,  although  differing  quantitatively  from 
the  latter  to  a  very  considerable  degree.  There  are  un- 
doubtedly certain  physical  constants  which  determine  the 
processes  of  the  nerve  membrane.  Among  these  are  the 
threshold  depolarization  required  to  stimulate,  the  magni- 
tude of  the  excitation  or  maximal  depolarization,  the  rate  of 
recovery  of  the  membrane,  etc.  At  the  synapse  these  con- 
stants appear  to  suffer  a  radical  change  in  magnitude,  of 
such  a  character  that  all  of  the  processes  are  retarded;  the 
latent  period  is  much  longer,  as  is  also  the  refractory  phase, 
and  if  we  suppose  the  synapse  to  have  a  phase  of  hyper- 
excitability  this  also  is  probably  much  prolonged.  By  a 
proper  choice  of  the  values  of  the  various  membrane  con- 
stants the  majority  of  the  characteristic  features  of  synaptic 
functions  can  be  explained. 

The  synaptic  process  is  evidently  a  membrane  process, 
which  means  that  it  is  localized  in  a  region  of  space  having 
the  general  form  of  a  thin  sheet.  It  should  be  noted,  how- 
ever, that  this  is  equally  true  of  the  general  process  of  con- 
duction in  a  nerve.  The  synaptic  function  is  probably  more 
complicated  than  that  of  plain  conduction,  since  it  involves 
the  combined  properties  of  two  membranes  in  juxtaposition. 
Some  of  the  peculiar  characteristics  of  conduction  through 
synapses  which  may  not  be  explicable  by  the  postulation  of 
mere  quantitative  differences  between  the  synapse  and  the 


THE  PHYSICAL  BASIS  OF  NERFE  FUNCTIONS  345 

nerve  trunk  may  perhaps  be  accounted  for  on  the  basis  of 
quantitative  differences  between  the  two  membrane  elements 
in  the  synapse.  For  example,  the  fact  that  a  synapse  nor- 
mally conducts  in  only  one  direction  can  be  attributed  to 
a  difference  between  the  intensities  and  thresholds  of  exci- 
tation for  the  two  adjoining  neurones,  such  that  a  more 
afferent  neurone  is  able  to  stimulate  a  more  efferent  one  but 
not  vice  versa.  It  is  possible  also  that  specially  ionized 
substances  may  exist  in  certain  synapses  which  introduce 
properties  characteristic  of  these  synapses. 

VII.     THE  MECHANISM  OF  THE  RECEPTOR 

Our  account  of  the  physical  nature  of  nerve  stimulation, 
conduction,  and  synaptic  transfer  needs  to  be  supplemented 
by  considerations  bearing  on  the  receptor  function.  Re- 
ceptors, in  general,  are  recognized  to  be  especially  differ- 
entiated cells,  often  more  epithelial  than  neural  in  character, 
which  lower  the  threshold  of  a  given  nerve  path  for  certain 
forms  of  stimuli  while  raising  it  for  others.  It  is  probable, 
moreover,  that  in  addition  to  being  stimulus  selectors,  re- 
ceptors are  essential  to  the  continued  stimulation  of  nervous 
tissue  by  any  fundamental  force.  DuBois-Reymond's  prin- 
ciple tends  to  make  the  effect  due  to  the  direct  action  of 
any  force  upon  the  nerve  a  merely  momentary  one.  In 
spite  of  the  phenomena  of  sensory  adaptation,  stimulation 
through  receptors  produces  relatively  continuous  excitation 
of  the  afferent  nerve  path.  Adaptation  itself  appears  to  be 
attributable  mainly  to  fatigue  of  the  receptor  process  rather 
than  of  the  nerve  path. 

In  a  previous  article1  I  have  suggested  a  plausible  physical 
account  of  a  manner  in  which  the  visual  receptors  may  be 
conceived  to  produce  a  continued  stimulation  of  the  optic 
nerve  fibers.  This  account  is  based  upon  the  empirical 
finding  that  the  retina  is  electrically  negative,  rather  than 
positive  as  would  be  expected,  with  respect  to  the  cut  end 
of  the  optic  nerve.  This  negativity  of  the  retina,  which 

Ireland,  L.  T.,  'The  Nature  of  the  Visual  Receptor  Process/  /.  of  the  Opt.  Soc. 
of  Amer.,  1917,  i,  9-13. 


346  LEONARD   THOMPSON   TROLAND 

is  increased  by  the  action  of  light,  seems  to  imply  that  the 
essential  ionized  substance  of  the  rods  and  cones  has  a  negative 
ion  which  diffuses  through  the  enclosing  membranes  of  the 
receptor  cells  more  readily  than  does  the  positive  ion,  pro- 
ducing a  state  of  polarization  opposite  in  direction  from  that 
of  ordinary  nerve  fibers.  It  is  clear  that  a  receptor  cell  thus 
polarized  and  in  contact  with  a  normal  nerve  fiber,  would 
tend  to  depolarize  the  latter  at  the  place  of  junction,  thus 
setting  the  fiber  into  excitation.  The  excitation  would 
probably  be  mutual,  resulting  in  a  reduction  of  the  polariza- 
tion both  of  the  nerve  membrane  and  of  the  receptor  mem- 
brane. We  have  reasons  for  supposing  that  the  inertia  of 
the  receptor  process  is  much  greater  than  that  of  the  nerve 
function,  so  that  in  all  probability  the  nerve  would  recover 
from  refractory  phase  considerably  in  advance  of  the  re- 
cuperation of  the  receptor  cell  polarization.  However,  when 
this  latter  recuperation  has  reached  a  certain  point,  a  second 
stimulation  of  the  nerve  fiber  would  result  and  this  process 
would  be  indefinitely  repeated.  The  result  would  be  a 
stream  of  quantal  impulses  sent  along  the  optic  nerve  fibers, 
and  having  a  frequency  determined  by  the  rate  of  recupera- 
tion of  the  receptor  cell. 

In  the  case  of  visual  response  it  is  easy  to  see  how  this  fre- 
quency can  be  caused  to  vary  as  a  result  of  variations  in  the 
stimulus.  The  direct  effect  of  light  upon  the  sensitive  sub- 
stance of  the  rods  or  cones  is  probably  one  of  increased  ioniza- 
tion  and  we  should  expect  the  rate  of  r<?polarization  of  the 
receptor  cell  membrane  to  increase  with  increase  in  concen- 
tration of  the  ions  within  the  cell.  The  optic  nerve  impulse 
frequency  would  thus  tend  to  be  augmented  by  the  action  of 
radiation  on  the  retina  and  to  a  degree  greater  the  greater  the 
intensity  of  radiation  of  any  given  wave-length. 

It  is  certain  that  the  processes  by  which  sensory  stimuli 
excite  receptors  are  as  varied  as  there  are  different  forms  of 
adequate  stimuli.  However,  it  is  conceivable  that  the  mode 
of  interaction  of  the  receptor  cell  and  the  conducting  nerve 
fiber  is  always  of  the  same  general  sort.  It  may  be  a  general 
characteristic  of  receptor  cells  to  have  a  negative  polarization, 


THE  PHYSICAL  BASIS  OF  NERVE  FUNCTIONS  347 

so  that  they  tend  constantly  to  depolarize  and  to  excite  the 
nerve  fiber.  A  stimulus  acting  upon  the  receptor  cell  would 
in  this  case  so  operate  as  either  to  increase  or  to  decrease  its 
negative  polarization.  It  is  easy  to  imagine  physical  or 
chemical  mechanisms  through  which  such  changes  could  be 
brought  about  by  the  action  of  almost  any  conceivable 
agency. 

Rhythmic  depolarization  mechanisms  of  a  sort  similar  to 
that  above  discussed  may  possibly  be  found  in  the  central 
nervous  system  as  well  as  in  the  periphery.  The  rhythm 
of  the  breathing  center  and  other  centers  such  as  those 
determining  certain  types  of  peristaltic  action,  muscle  tonus, 
etc.,  may  be  controlled  by  such  mechanisms. 

VIII.       PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL  APPLICATIONS 

The  ultimate  physical  analysis  of  the  nerve  function  must 
provide  us,  according  to  my  view,  with  the  fundamental 
materials  on  the  physiological  side  for  the  construction  of  an 
ultimate  psychophysical  theory.  The  traditional  doctrine 
of  the  interdependency  of  'mind  and  body'  teaches  us  that 
consciousness  depends  upon  the  existence  and  nature  of 
central  nerve  processes.  If  we  reject  vitalistic  fancies  we 
must  be  forced  eventually  to  describe  these  central  processes 
in  physical  terms  and  thus  to  conceive  them  as  certain  con- 
figurations and  changes  in  configuration  of  electrical  particles. 

Some  modern  thinkers,  often  officially  catalogued  as 
psychologists,  subscribe  to  the  view  that  there  is  no  such 
thing  as  consciousness,  and  they  of  course  cannot  be  expected 
to  take  much  interest  in  the  psychophysical  problem.  These 
same  thinkers  often  appear  to  believe  in  the  existence  of  a 
peculiar  characteristic  of  physiological  activity  called  'the 
operation  of  the  organism  as  a  whole.'  If,  however,  we 
define  consciousness  as  simply  any  given  experience  we  dispose 
of  any  difficulty  about  the  non-existence  of  this  entity,  and 
the  more  we  analyze  the  operations  of  'organisms  as  a  whole' 
the  clearer  it  becomes  that  these  operations  are  simply  con- 
catenations of  many  part  processes.  The  ultimate  account 
is  one  which  expresses  any  process,  no  matter  how  compli- 


348  LEONARD  THOMPSON  TROLAND 

cated,  in  terms  of  the  operations  of  irreducible  physical 
elements. 

The  central  nerve  process,  which  in  the  traditional 
theory  acts  as  the  determinant  of  consciousness,  consists 
essentially,  according  to  the  modern  idea,  of  synaptic  func- 
tions. Such  functions,  however,  apparently  differ  only 
quantitatively  from  those  of  simple  nervous  conduction,  and 
if  consciousness  is  associated  with  synaptic  processes  it 
probably  is  also  correlated  to  some  degree  with  the  simpler 
processes  of  conduction.  Both  of  these  related  functions, 
as  we  have  seen,  are  membrane  processes,  and  it  would 
therefore  appear  that  the  physical  correlate  of  consciousness 
is  localized  in  some  definite  configuration  of  sheet-like  regions 
of  space.  This  'region  of  determination  of  consciousness' 
is  almost  without  doubt  located  in  the  association  areas  of 
the  cerebral  cortex  in  the  case  of  the  human  introspective 
field,  which  is  the  main  object  of  study  for  pure  psychology. 

The  introspective  analysis  of  consciousness  provides  us 
with  certain  psychical  elements,  attributes,  and  modes  of 
relationship,  for  each  of  which  it  is  desirable  to  find  definite 
physiological  correlates.  A  careful  study  of  the  implications 
of  ordinary  laboratory  psychophysics — which  determines  the 
relationships  between  stimuli  and  their  conscious  reactions — 
with  the  theory  of  nerve  action  should  ultimately  enable  us 
to  work  out  some  of  these  direct  psychophysical  correlations. 
Our  theory  of  the  receptor  process  in  the  case  of  vision  sug- 
gests that  nerve  impulse  frequency,  or  at  any  rate  the  mag- 
nitude of  the  nerve  current,  is  the  determinant  of  what  we 
call  sensory  intensity.  The  characteristic  qualities  of  differ- 
ent 'sensations'  are  correlated  by  the  traditional  doctrine  of 
specific  energies  with  the  identity  of  the  nerve  path  which  is 
excited.  Mere  abstract  identity,  however,  will  scarcely 
suffice.  We  must  suppose  that  these  qualities  depend  upon 
peculiarities,  either  structural  or  functional,  in  the  cerebral 
synapses  which  are  set  into  operation  by  different  afferent 
nerves.  In  another  paper1  I  have  suggested  that  many  of 

1Troland,  L.  T.,  'A  System  for  Explaining  Affective  Phenomena,'  /.  ofAbnorm. 
Psychol.,  1920,  14,  376-387. 


THE  PHYSICAL  BASIS  OF  NERFE  FUNCTIONS  349 

the  facts  about  affection,  or  pleasantness  and  unpleasantness, 
can  be  explained  on  the  assumption  that  its  neural  correlate 
lies  in  the  rate  of  change  of  synaptic  conductance  in  that  par- 
ticular portion  of  the  cerebral  gray  matter  which  is  re- 
sponsible for  the  introspective  consciousness  at  any  given 
moment.  Clearness  and  other  fundamental  characteristics 
of  factors  in  consciousness  will  eventually  find  their  proper 
correlates  in  the  cerebral  nerve  process. 

It  is  certain  that  the  physical  correlate  of  the  simplest 
introspectively  discriminable  factor  of  consciousness  must, 
from  the  physical  point  of  view,  be  enormously  complicated. 
A  point  visual  sensation,  for  example,  can  scarcely  be  attri- 
buted to  the  function  of  any  cerebral  component  smaller 
than  a  single  synapse,  and  it  is  certain  that  a  single  synaptic 
mechanism  involves  the  simultaneous  cooperation  of  millions 
of  physical  atoms,  electrons,  electrical  and  magnetic  fields, 
etc.  The  coexistence  in  a  single  moment  of  consciousness 
of  a  multitude  of  sensory  elements  arranged  in  a  definite 
pattern  must  depend  upon  the  concurrent  and  unified  func- 
tioning of  a  large  number  of  cerebral  synapses.  Unless  we 
are  to  employ  assumptions  which  suggest  a  non-physical  or 
spiritual  factor  in  the  determination  of  consciousness,  we 
must  suppose  that  the  unity  of  consciousness  depends  upon 
some  sort  of  unity  in  the  total  nerve  process  upon  which 
consciousness  depends. 

I  am  attempting  to  work  out  plausible  solutions  for  some 
of  these  fundamental  psychophysical  problems  in  connection 
with  a  general  metaphysical  theory  which  I  have  called 
'Paraphysical  Monism.'1  This  doctrine  provides  us  with 
an  explanation  of  the  facts  of  psychophysical  parallelism 
which  eliminates  the  fundamental  dualism  of  the  Leibnitzian 
preestablished  harmony,  permitting  us  to  combine  the  facts 
of  physics  and  psychology  into  a  unified  system.  Psy- 
chology needs  all  of  the  stimulus  which  it  can  derive  from  the 
advances  of  physical  and  physiological  science.  Indeed, 
this  need  is  so  dire  as  almost  to  warrant  the  suicidal  pro- 
mulgations of  those  'psychologists'  who  call  themselves 

,  L.  T.,  'Paraphysical  Monism,'  Philos.  Rev.,  1918,  27,  39-62. 


35°  LEONARD   THOMPSON  T ROLAND 

'behaviorists.'  The  psychology  of  the  soul  is  dead,  and 
that  of  consciousness  is  suffering  murderous  attacks.  What- 
ever we  may  think  of  the  former,  the  latter  is  assuredly  worth 
saving,  and  it  is  my  impression  that  the  data  provided  by 
modern  nerve  physiology  will  provide  us  with  means  for 
resuscitating  the  true  science  of  physiological  psychology  as 
it  was  conceived  by  Fechner,  Miiller,  Helmholtz,  and  other 
pioneers. 


THEORIES  OF  THE  WILL  AND  KIN^ESTHETIC 
SENSATIONS 

BY  RAYMOND  H.  WHEELER 

University  of  Oregon 

Theories  of  the  will  in  psychology  owe  their  origin  to  the 
development  of  ethical  views  among  the  early  Greeks.  These 
theories,  together  with  those  held  by  the  early  Church  Fathers 
and  the  Scholastics,  may  be  classified  as  intellectual  and  abso- 
lute. Both  of  these  groups  made  will  a  faculty  of  the  soul. 
The  intellectual  theories  derived  their  name  from  the  impor- 
tance which  they  ascribe  to  the  faculty  of  reason  as  a  con- 
stituent of  willing;  the  absolute  theories  made  all  other  faculties 
of  the  soul  subordinate  to  the  will.  In  the  Aristotelian  view 
the  will  consisted  of  a  l desire'  to  which  a  'goal'  or  an  'end' 
was  supplied  by  the  reason.  Desire  was  analyzed  as  a  per- 
sistent state  of  unrest  or  striving  and  was  the  essential  active 
or  dynamic  feature  of  mental  life.  During  the  middle  ages 
theories  of  the  will  were  concerned  largely  with  the  problem  of 
determinism  versus  freedom,  hence  the  relative  importance 
of  the  two  faculties,  the  intellect  and  the  will,  as  agents  in 
controlling  human  behavior,  was  a  subject  of  paramount 
importance. 

As  a  consequence  of  empirical  and  inductive  methods,  we 
find  in  England  from  the  time  of  Hobbes  to  Hume  the  develop- 
ment of  a  new  type  of  theory,  the  emotional  theory:  Hume 
regarded  the  feelings  as  essential  constituents  of  every  voli- 
tional process.  Locke  had  previously  held  that  disquietude 
or  uneasiness  constituted  the  origin  and  the  dynamic  feature 
of  volition,  a  view  which  in  its  essence  was  but  a  rehabilitation 
of  Aristotle's  potential  desire.  On  the  continent  from  Des- 
cartes to  Herbart  the  tendency  was  gradually  becoming  defini- 
tized  of  conceiving  the  will  as  the  active  side  of  mental  life 
in  general,  or  as  a  general  striving  tendency. 

Up  to  the  time  of  more  modern  psychology,  then,  there 

35' 


35  2  RAYMOND  H.   WHEELER 

were  in  general  three  views  of  the  will.  In  a  broad  sense  of  the 
term  the  will  included  all  mental  activity  as  such,  an  activity 
characterized  as  a  potential  desire  or  as  a  state  of  unrest. 
This  tendency  culminated  in  a  definitized  theory  of  conation. 
Secondly  there  was  a  voluntaristic  tendency  to  employ  the 
term  will  itself  to  mean  this  active  feature  of  mental  life  or 
the  source  and  cause  of  action.  Thirdly  there  was  a  tendency 
to  bring  the  will  into  intimate  relations  with  the  feelings  where 
the  feelings  were  regarded  as  essential  constituents  of  volitional 
processes. 

Modern  theories  may  be  classified  according  to  the  feature 
most  characteristic  of  each,  namely  its  emphasis  upon  the 
reductivity  or  the  non-reductivity  of  will  to  a  complex  group- 
ing or  mode  of  functioning  of  simpler  constituents.  Those 
theories  which  reduce  will  to  a  peculiar  order  of  sequence  of 
sensations,  images  and  affections  and  which  do  not  emphasize 
the  elementary  nature  of  any  one  constituent  we  may  call  the 
totally  reductive.  On  the  other  hand  those  theories  which  admit 
the  existence  of  an  elementary  mental  content — an  elementary 
and  unique  volitional  process — may  be  called  non-reductive. 
In  this  latter  group  the  will  has  an  elementary  content  which 
is  not  necessarily  independent,  functionally,  from  other  con- 
tents. Intermediate  between  these  two  groups  of  theories  is 
another  which  we  may  call  the  partially  reductive.  Here  the 
will  is  reduced  partly  to  the  functioning  of  the  traditional 
elements  of  consciousness  and  partly  to  a  unique  elemental 
content.  The  latter  might  be  said  to  constitute  a  structural 
and  functional  criterion  or  an  essential  conscious  concomitant 
of  the  volitional  consciousness.  This  group  may  be  subdivided 
thus:  (i)  those  theories  which  posit  a  conative  element;  (2) 
those  theories-  which  posit  an  intrinsically  active  ego;  (3) 
those  which  regard  the  feelings  as  the  essential  constituents 
of  will;  (4)  those  which  ascribe  to  mental  processes  a  force  or 
general  innervation  mechanism.  A  final  group  of  theories 
may  be  called  motor  or  behavioristic  owing  to  the  fact  that 
emphasis  in  them  is  laid  upon  the  principle  of  stimulus  and 
response.  Here  the  will,  reduced  to  its  simplest  terms,  becomes 
a  system  of  coordinated  reflexes  or  motor  responses  and  the 
innervation  mechanisms  are  not  mental  but  physiological. 


THEORIES  OF  THE  WILL  AND  KINASSTHETIC  SENSATIONS  353 

Non-reductive  Theories. — Lotze1  conceived  the  will  to  be 
an  unanalysable  psychic  process  which  functioned  chiefly  in 
choice  and  resolve.  Since  it  was  not  constantly  functioning 
as  a  datum  of  consciousness  it  was  relegated  to  the  domain  of 
the  subconscious  where  it  found  a  resting  place  when  not 
actually  in  operation.  In  the  more  recent  literature  Ach2  and 
Michotte8  might  be  mentioned  among  those  who,  in  conse- 
quence of  their  failure  to  analyze  the  volitional  process  experi- 
mentally and  in  consequence  of  finding  a  'feeling  of  mental 
activity'  in  'genuine'  volitional  acts,  make  a  certain  part  of 
the  volitional  consciousness,  at  least,  elemental  and  non- 
sensory.  James'4  most  often  quoted  'fiat'  consciousness  was 
a  subjective  experience  sui-generis  which  could  be  designated 
but  not  defined. 

Partially  Reductive  Theories. — Herbart's5  theory  of  the  will 
is  an  early  example  of  the  conative  theory.  Here  the  will  in 
its  elemental  form  was  to  be  found  in  the  striving  of  ideas  for 
existence  in  consciousness  or  for  the  possession  of  the  conscious 
level.  This  striving  process  began  in  the  realm  of  the  un- 
conscious. Volition  consisted  first  of  desire,  a  product  of  re- 
sistance between  striving  ideas  and  secondly  in  the  opposition 
between  groups  of  associated  ideas  (goals  of  purposes).  Lipps6 
assumed  a  striving  process  not  only  in  ideas  but  in  feelings 
and  sensations  as  well.  Both  affective  processes  and  feelings 
of  activity  were  essential  constituents  of  willing  and  of  the 
volitional  consciousness.  The  conationists,  among  whom  may 
be  mentioned  Stout,7  especially,  ascribe  to  each  conscious 
state  an  inherent  tendency  to  pass  beyond  itself  into  another 
conscious  state,  a  striving  process  which  is  directly  labelled 
conation  and  which,  in  itself,  is  present  to  consciousness. 

Writing  from  the  point  of  view  of  a  self  psychology  Calkins 
described  the  content  of  willing  as  an  active  'consciousness  of 

'Medicinische  Psychologic,'  Leipzig,  1852. 
'Ueber  den  Willensakt  und  das  Temperament,'  Leipzig,  1910. 
'Etude  experimental  sur  le  choix  volontaire  et  ses   antecedents   immediats,' 
Arch  de  psychol.,  10,  1910,  113-321. 

'Principles  of  Psychology,'  1890,  Vol.  II. 
'Lehrbuch  der  Psychologic,'  Leipzig,  1850. 
'Von  Fiihlen,  Wollen  und  Denken,'  Leipzig,  1902. 
'A  Manual  of  Psychology,'  London,  1913. 


354  RAYMOND  H.  WHEELER 

my  active  connection  with  other  selves  or  with  other  things ' 
('First  Book  in  Psychology,'  3d  rev.  ed.,  p.  226).  The  voli- 
tional consciousness  is  said  to  involve  the  essential  non-sensory 
factor  of  the  'self-as-willing.'  Ach  and  Michotte  found  an 
immediate  and  unanalyzable  consciousness  of  the  self  or  an 
intrinsically  active  ego  in  all  genuine  volitional  acts.  Meu- 
mann1  assumed  that  the  process  of  'accepting'  a  goal  idea,  in 
a  volitional  act,  involved  an  immediate  consciousness  of  the 
self.  Both  partially  reductive  and  totally  reductive  tendencies 
can  be  found  in  the  analyses  of  volition  which  have  been  made 
by  these  latter  writers. 

The  emotional  theory  of  the  will  may  be  illustrated  by 
reference  to  Bain2  and  Wundt.3  Bain  defined  the  will  as  all 
mental  and  physical  activities  insofar  as  they  were  guided  or 
impelled  by  the  feelings  of  pleasure  or  pain.  Wundt's  theory 
(which  is  voluntaristic  as  well  as  emotional)  makes  will  the 
original  energy  of  consciousness,  the  first  and  primary  form 
of  which  is  a  simple  impulse  motivated  by  pleasure  or  pain. 
When  an  organism  experiences  a  simple  sensation  there  arises 
a  feeling  process  which  develops  to  a  maximal  state  of  intensity 
beyond  which  it  overflows  into  movement.  Such  a  sensation- 
feeling-action  series  of  experiences  and  events  is  called  a  simple 
or  primary  act  of  will.  Feeling  processes,  therefore,  possess 
an  innate  capacity  toward  willing.  This  is  either  a  capacity 
to  arouse  physical  movements  or  to  initiate  into  consciousness 
other  mental  processes.  In  more  complicated  forms  of  will 
the  feelings  or  emotions  may  be  observed  to  increase  gradually 
in  their  intensity,  beginning  with  pleasantness  or  unpleasant- 
ness, eventually  developing  into  strain  or  excitement.  These 
feeling  states  fuse  into  a  'total  feeling  of  activity'  which  is  an 
essential  conscious  concomitant  of  complex  or  secondary  acts 
of  will.  In  this  category  are  found  such  acts  as  choosing  and 
performing  difficult  tasks.  Secondary  volitional  acts  may  be 
motivated  by  ideas  which  are  associated  with  the  feelings. 

As  an  example  of  a  'force'  theory  may  be  cited  Fouillee4 

1  'Intelligenz  und  Wille,'  Leipzig,  1913. 

2  'The  Emotions  and  the  Will,'  London,  1899. 

3  'Grundziige  der  Physiologische  Psychologic,'  Leipzig,  1903. 

4  'L'evolutionisme  des  idees-forces,'  Paris,  1893. 


THEORIES  OF  THE  WILL  AND  KINJESTHETIC  SENSATIONS    355 

for  whom  sensations  and  feelings  are  at  the  same  time  conscious 
states  and  mental  forces  according  to  the  viewpoint  taken  in 
regarding  such  mental  processes  as  contents  or  as  acts. 

Totally  Reductive  Theories. — Miinsterberg1  held  that  the  will 
as  a  datum  of  consciousness  was  a  goal-idea  which  had  come 
to  be  associated  with  other  ideas  or  with  muscular  movements. 
This  goal-idea  involved  the  anticipation  of  an  end.  In  other 
words  it  is  a  mental  process  of  sensory  origin  having  to  do 
with  preparatory  motor  adjustments.  Ebbinghaus2  in  like 
manner  held  that  volition  consisted  in  the  capacity  to  foresee 
the  end  of  action  by  associating  an  image  with  an  act  in  such 
fashion  that  the  image  would  function  as  the  stimulus  for  the 
subsequent  act.  In  the  views  of  Ach3  and  Meumann4  we 
might  have  found  totally  reductive  theories  had  it  not  been 
for  the  fact  that  both  ultimately  drag  in  a  non-sensory  experi- 
ence pertaining  to  the  self  and  feelings  of  activity.  Meumann 
described  the  will  as  a  selective  process  brought  about  by 
means  of  *  accepted'  goal  ideas,  while  in  a  similar  fashion  Ach 
found  the  clue  to  a  volitional  act  in  the  acceptance  of  an 
Aufgabe.  The  capacity  of  goal-ideas  to  so  control  subsequent 
mental  processes  depended  upon  the  previous  forming  of  asso- 
ciations between  the  foresight  of  an  end  and  the  act  which 
attained  that  end. 

Behavioristic  Theories. — The  modern  trend  of  descriptions 
of  the  will  is  obviously  behavioristic,  where  the  emphasis  is 
laid  upon  the  coordinated  responses  of  the  organism  to  its 
environment  and  not  upon  the  mental  contents  as  such.  But 
owing  to  the  lack  of  experimental  evidence  accurate  accounts 
of  the  volitional  process  cannot  be  presented.  According  to 
Ribot6  the  will  is  to  be  regarded  as  the  sum  total  of  the  organ- 
ism's responses  to  environment.  All  mental  processes  tend  to 
express  themselves  in  some  form  of  overt  action  and  would 
succeed  in  doing  so  were  it  not  for  processes  of  inhibition. 
The  continuity  of  mental  states  can  be  expressed  only  in  terms 
of  the  continuity  of  these  organized  motor  responses. 

1  'Die  Willenshandlung,'  Freiburg,  1913. 

8  'Grundzuge  der  Psychologic,'  Leipzig,  1911. 

1  Loc.  cit. 

4  Loc .  cit. 

4  'The  Diseases  of  the  Will'  (trans.),  Chicago,  1903. 


35 6  RAYMOND  H.   WHEELER 

Notwithstanding  the  numerous  descriptions  and  interpreta- 
tions of  the  will  which  have  appeared  in  the  literature  we 
find  little  genuine  progress  in  ascertaining  the  exact  char- 
acteristics of  the  volitional  consciousness.  It  is  evident,  how- 
ever, that  it  cannot  be  described  adequately  in  terms  of  struc- 
tural contents  alone.  Functionally,  two  distinct  problems  are 
involved,  namely  those  of  the  will  in  a  broader  and  in  a  narrower 
sense.  In  the  broader  sense  the  problem  of  the  will  should  be 
identified  with  the  problem  of  the  general  sequence  of  mental 
processes.  Such  discussions  seek  to  answer  the  question,  how 
may  the  sequence  of  mental  processes  be  envisaged  in  mental 
terms?  Or  stating  the  problem  in  objective  terms:  how  may 
the  continuity  of  the  organism's  responses  to  environment  be 
best  described?  In  the  narrower  sense  the  will  should  be 
identified  with  the  problem  of  a  particular  portion  or  order  of 
sequence  where  the  question  is  asked  how  may  one  group  of 
mental  processes  exert  an  apparent  directing  influence  over 
subsequent  mental  processes ?  Stated  in  objective  terms:  how 
may  one  response  lead  inevitably  to  the  making  of  a  subsequent 
response  ? 

Theories  which  have  been  formulated  from  a  subjective 
point  of  view  have  reduced  the  will,  in  the  broader  sense,  to  a 
potential  desire  (Aristotle),  to  a  state  of  uneasiness  (Locke), 
to  a  striving  process  (Herbart,  Lipps),  to, a  conative  tendency 
(Stout,  Baldwin  and  others)  to  an  intrinsically  active  ego 
(Calkins,  etc.),  to  innervating  properties  of  the  feelings  or 
emotions  (Bain,  Wundt)  and  to  an  alleged  dynamic  force 
(Fouillee).  Other  writers  have  concerned  themselves  with  the 
general  problem  of  sequence  but  from  an  objective  point  of 
view;  hence  the  will  has  become  the  sum  total  of  the  organism's 
motor  responses  (Ribot  and  others). 

Still  others  who  have  faced  the  same  problem  and  who 
have  borne  in  mind  both  its  structural  and  functional  aspects 
have  failed  to  find  any  structural  clue  to  the  general  problem 
of  sequence,  hence  for  them  the  problem  becomes  one  of  a 
unique  or  particular  order  of  sequence.  Here,  again,  failing  to 
find  elementary  structural  clues  they  have  formulated  theories 
of  a  totally  reductive  character.  In  such  theories  the  im- 


THEORIES  OF  THE  WILL  AND  KIN  ESTHETIC  SENSATIONS    357 

portant  role  is  assigned  to  a  goal-idea  or  Aufgabe  which  condi- 
tions the  sequence  of  mental  processes  by  means  of  productive 
or  selective  influences.  On  the  other  hand  there  have  been 
many  attempts  to  state  clearly  the  problem  both  in  its  broader 
and  narrower  aspects.  For  example,  the  will  in  its  narrower 
sense  (volition  proper)  was  envisaged  by  Aristotle  as  a  rational 
desire;  by  Hume,  Bain  and  Wundt  as  a  highly  organized 
sequence  of  potential  emotional  processes  associated  with  ideas; 
by  the  conationists  as  a  highly  organized  conative  system  the 
distinctive  feature  of  which  was  the  foresight  of  an  end.  An- 
other view  involves  an  assertive  attitude  of  the  self  (Calkins). 
The  problems  have  been  the  same  throughout  all  these  dis- 
cussions; but  how  different  have  been  the  solutions! 

The  confusion  found  in  these  descriptions  can  be  traced 
obviously  to  widely  different  points  of  view.  Advocates  of 
partially  reductive  theories  have  been  obliged  to  appeal  either 
to  a  volitional  constituent  in  the  feelings,  to  an  alleged  conative 
element,  to  an  intrinsically  active  ego  or  to  forces  inherent  in 
sensation  and  affection  in  order  to  account  for  the  general 
conscious  continuum  in  purely  subjective  factors  while  adhering 
at  the  same  time  to  an  atomistic  conception  of  mind.  It  is 
the  problem  of  getting  elementary  states  of  consciousness  back 
into  a  working,  active  system  again  after  they  have  been  as- 
signed the  role  of  units  or  *  atoms.'  It  is  the  problem  of  making 
a  river  out  of  a  succession  of  barrels  in  the  stream  bed.  Witness 
the  attempts  of  those  writers  who  adhere  to  an  atomistic  and 
structural  conception  of  mind  but  who  have  failed  to  discover 
any  elemental  conscious  experience  whose  constant  presence 
in  mental  life  will  explain  the  continuity  of  conscious  states. 
Such  writers  (James,1  Brentano,2  Witasek3)  have  resorted  to 
other  factors  such  as  to  a  differentiation  between  transitive 
and  substantive  states  or  between  act  and  content.  From  a 
more  objective  point  of  view  the  recent  motor  movement  in 
psychology  seems  to  be  based  essentially  upon  an  attempt  to 
solve  the  general  problem  of  sequence  and  unbroken  continuum. 


1  Loc.  cit. 

2  'Psychologic  vom  empirischen  Standpunkte,'  1874. 
1  'Grundlinien  der  Psychologic,'  1908. 


358  RAYMOND  H.   WHEELER 

As  for  the  narrower  problem — the  determination  of  subse- 
quent processes  by  an  antecedent  process — one  finds  the  same 
divergence  in  points  of  view  and  in  results.  The  issue  has 
been  definitely  sharpened  by  positing  the  existence  of  a  deter- 
mining tendency  or  directing  of  the  course  of  the  stream  of 
consciousness.  But  this  determining  tendency  may  be  either 
a  driving,  a  vis  a  tergo  exerted  by  the  Aufgabe  (Ach)  or  a  leading 
— an  attracting — by  goal  ideas  (Meumann).  Auxiliary  prin- 
ciples such  as  associative  tendencies,  perseveration  tendencies 
and  constellations  have  been  appealed  to  in  an  endeavor  to 
formulate  the  problem  and  its  solution  more  clearly.  But 
the  traditional  principles  of  association  have  borne  the  burden 
throughout  all  these  more  recent  discussions.  The  objective 
or  behavioristic  attack  upon  this  same  narrower  problem  in- 
cludes the  reflex-arc  concept  (Dewey)1  and  the  principle  of 
ideo-motor  action. 

The  solution  of  these  problems  has  been  delayed,  also, 
because  of  the  very  meager  introspective  analyses  which  have 
so  far  been  made  under  experimentally  controlled  conditions. 
It  is  extremely  doubtful  whether  a  genuinely  vigorous  volitional 
act  has  ever,  in  the  past,  been  subjected  to  adequate  intro- 
spection. 

It  seems  to  the  writer  that  insofar  as  the  partially  reductive 
theories  have  been  based  upon  introspective  evidence,  the 
trouble  has  been  in  a  failure  to  reduce  conation,  striving  process, 
feelings  of  activity,  etc.,  to  a  common  process.  We  have 
every  reason  to  believe  that  many  of  Wundt's  'feelings,'  for 
example,  are  forms  of  kinsesthetic  sensations.  Is  it  not  quite 
probable  that  what  the  conationists  have  called  the  immediate 
conative  experience  is  kinaesthetic  sensation?  The  writer  is 
firmly  convinced  that  the  'feeling  of  mental  activity'  described 
by  Ach  and  Michotte  is  a  complex  of  kinsesthetic  sensations. 
Moreover  is  it  not  also  possible  that  Meumann's  consciousness 
of  the  self  in  the  acceptance  of  a  task  or  that  Professor  Calkins's 
intrinsically  active  ego  are  interpretations  unwittingly  based 
upon  an  immediately  experienced  but  complex  and  diffuse 
kinsesthetic  background  and  nothing  else?  Within  the  last 

1  'The  Reflex  Arc  Concept  in  Psychology,'  PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1896,  3,  p.  357. 


THEORIES  OF  THE  WILL  AND  KINAESTHETIC  SENSATIONS    359 

few  years  there  have  appeared  several  elaborate  introspective 
descriptions1  of  various  conscious  processes  but  in  none  of 
these  do  we  find  the  slightest  hint  of  such  elements.  Kinaesthe- 
tic  sensations  are  with  us  always  in  mental  life.  Recent 
introspective  works  and  more  especially  those  of  Fernberger 
and  the  writer  show  the  importance  of  such  processes.  In 
fact,  as  the  writer  has  shown  in  an  introspective  study  of 
choosing,2  kinaesthetic  processes  are  essential  and  as  a  type 
the  only  essential  form  of  elemental  conscious  process  in  the 
act  of  choosing. 

It  does  not  seem  unwarranted,  therefore,  to  conclude  that 
the  extreme  variations  in  past  descriptions  of  the  will  conscious- 
ness both  in  its  broader  and  narrower  aspects  have  been  due 
to  various  interpretations  of  a  consciousness  which  is  so  largely 
made  up  of  kinaesthetic  sensations.  From  these  experiences 
we  get  our  notions  of  striving,  strain,  activity,  force,  conation 
and  the  like.  It  may  be  open  to  question,  also,  whether  the 
Freudian  wish  and  its  various  cousins  are  not  veiled  and 
unconscious  interpretations  unwittingly  based  upon  a  con- 
sciousness of  kinaesthetic  strain. 

To  sum  up,  theories  of  the  will  in  the  history  of  psychology 
represent  successive  attempts  to  describe  the  conscious  con- 
tinuum as  a  whole  and  to  describe  the  process  of  control  in 
any  given  portion  of  the  conscious  continuum.  The  chief 
cause  for  the  great  variability  of  these  descriptions  lies  in  a 
further  attempt  to  find  evidence  of  this  continuity  in  some 
unique  mental  process.  Where  such  an  elemental  process  has 
been  found  lacking  we  have  been  obliged  to  resort  to  the  prin- 
ciple of  act  and  content.  Various  points  of  view  have  added 
to  the  confusion.  And  in  modern  psychology,  inadequate 
introspective  data  has  led  to  inadequate  interpretation.  The 
unique  mental  process,  we  believe,  is  nothing  more  than 
kinaesthetic  sensation. 

1  E.  L.  Woods,  'An  Experimental  Analysis  of  the  Process  of  Recognizing,'  Amer. 
J.  of  Psychol.,  1915,  26,  313-387.     S.  C.  Fisher,  'The  Process  of  Generalizing;  and  its 
Product,  the  General  Concept,'  Psychol.  Mon.,  1916,  ax,  No.  2  (Whole  No.  90).     S.  W . 
Fernberger,  'An  Introspective  Analysis  of  the  Process  of  Comparing,'  Psychol.  Mon., 
1919,  26,  No.  6  (Whole  No.  117). 

2  R.  H.  Wheeler,  'An  Experimental  Investigation  of  the  Process  of  Choosing,' 
University  of  Oregon  Publications,  1920,  Vol.  I,  No.  2. 


360  RAYMOND  H.  WHEELER 

This  compels  us  to  settle  upon  a  point  of  view.  It  shows 
us  the  futility  of  searching  for  introspective  evidence  of  con- 
tinuity and  places  us  in  the  position  of  the  other  sciences  where 
we  rightly  should  be — the  position  of  finding  continuity  in 
data  treated  from  an  objective  point  of  view.  We  should  look 
for  the  solution  of  the  problem,  therefore,  in  behavioristic 
principles.  The  cry  at  present  is,  in  some  circles,  to  do  away 
with  introspection.  But  in  the  other  sciences  observations 
are  made  via  the  senses.  Why  can  we  not  observe  our  own 
behavior  in  the  same  way?  Introspection  as  sensory  evidence 
of  our  own  behavior  ought  to  be  as  valid  as  sensory  observation 
of  any  movement  external  to  our  bodies.  Let  the  'feel'  of  a 
response  be  as  ample  evidence  of  the  existence  of  that  response 
as  the  'sight'  of  it  in  another  person  or  an  animal.  To  be  sure 
introspective  evidence  should  be  verified  wherever  possible 
both  by  objective  instruments  and  by  similar  reports  from  large 
numbers  of  observers.  Our  view  is  that  in  attempting  to 
solve  psychological  problems  in  the  future, — problems  which 
were  formally  considered  purely  subjective — we  are  warranted 
in  drawing  behavioristic  interpretations,  in  part  at  least,  from 
introspective  data. 


A  PURSUIT  PENDULUM1 

BY  WALTER  R.  MILES 
Nutrition  Laboratory  of  the  Carnegie  Institution  of  Washington.   Boston,  Mass. 

One  of  the  measurements  used  at  the  Nutrition  Laboratory 
on  the  aviation  candidates  in  the  spring  of  1917  was  to  record 
the  adequacy  of  ocular-pursuit  movements  in  following  the 
swing  of  a  pendulum.  The  subject  was  seated  at  a  head-rest 
with  the  left  eye  covered.  A  polished  metal  bead  suspended 
by  an  invisible  cord  was  arranged  to  swing  through  a  visual 
angle  of  about  40°.  The  pendulum  made  a  double  swing  in 
2  seconds.  Its  release  was  synchronous  with  exposure  of  the 
eye  to  the  recording  beam  of  light,  after  the  manner  of  Dodge's 
photographic  technique.2  The  repeated  instruction  was  to 
watch  the  bead  intently  every  moment  of  its  swing.  Six  or 
more  successive  trials  by  a  subject  were  photographed  side 
by  side  on  one  plate.  These  records  do  not  easily  provide 
an  exact  quantitative  score  for  accuracy  of  pursuit.  How- 
ever, it  is  convenient  to  rank  these  photographic  records 
showing  the  reaction  time  occurring  at  the  start  of  the 
pendulum's  swing,  together  with  the  number  and  size  of 
abrupt  horizontal  movements  by  which  the  subject  supple- 
ments his  inadequate  pursuit,  into  five  grades  or  groups  of 
excellence.  Such  grouping  gave  a  positive  correlation  of  0.40 
with  the  subsequent  progress  of  these  men  in  learning  to  fly.3 

1  In  abbreviated  form  this  paper  was  read  before  the  American  Psychological 
Association,  Cambridge,  December  30,  1919. 

1  Diefendorf  and  Dodge,  Brain,  1908,  31,  pp.  451-489.  See  Plate  II  for  illustra- 
tive records  showing  fully  the  characteristics  of  this  type  of  eye-movements.  For  a 
description  of  the  eye-movement  recording  apparatus  as  used  on  the  aviation  candi- 
dates, see  Benedict,  Miles,  Roth,  and  Smith,  'Human  Vitality  and  Efficiency  under 
Prolonged  Restricted  Diet,'  Carnegie  Ihst.  Wash.  Pub.  No.  280,  1919,  pp.  159  ff.  and 
pp.  184  ff. 

'Our  subjects,  the  first  groups  of  candidates  to  attend  the  Aviation  Ground 
School  of  the  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology,  were  a  very  superior  lot  of  men. 
Nearly  all  graduates  of  our  best  universities,  these  men  had  been  prominent  in  athletics 
and  many  of  them  on  their  own  initiative  and  at  their  own  expense  had  taken  some 

361 


WALTER  R.  MILES 

At  the  time  this  result  was  found  hardly  any  single  test 
indicated  a  higher  correlation  with  flying.  Officials  advised, 
however,  that  the  ocular-pursuit  measurement,  as  carried  out 
photographically,  was  too  complex  for  any  general  use  in  the 
preliminary  selection  of  candidates  for  pilot  training. 

These  details  have  been  recited  as  they  account  for  the 
simplicity  of  the  device  described  below.  The  pursuit  pendu- 
lum was  an  effort  to  meet  a  definite  situation.  Care  was 
exercised  to  exclude  all  electrical  and  photographic  or  other 
graphic  features,  to  make  the  apparatus  its  own  gravity- 
operated  chronometer  and  such  that  it  could  be  used  nearly 
anywhere  and  would  give  an  immediate  quantitative  score 
for  the  accuracy  of  the  eye-hand  coordination  in  pursuit 
movement.  Although  an  opportunity  never  came  after  the 
development  of  the  test  to  try  it  on  a  group  of  aviators  or  men 
who  were  in  this  training,  the  possible  general  usefulness  of 
the  measurement  to  other  laboratory  workers  and  in  industry 
may  warrant  the  description  of  the  pursuit  pendulum,  together 
with  illustrative  data  for  initial  performance,  improvement 
with  practice,  and  changes  in  efficiency,  e.g.,  as  produced  by 
a  superimposed  nutritional  factor  such  as  alcohol. 

From  a  suitable  wall  bracket  a  pendulum  carrying  a 
reservoir  is  arranged  to  swing  over  a  sink  or  table,  a  small 
stream  of  water  flowing  from  the  lower  extremity  as  the 
pendulum  swings.  The  individual  under  test,  seated  before 
the  sink,  attempts  to  catch  the  water  in  a  cup  of  limited 
diameter.  A  separate  cup  is  used  for  each  double  swing 
and  the  volume  of  liquid  collected  represents  quantitatively 
the  adequacy  of  pursuit. 

The  bracket,  A  (see  Fig.  i),  extends  from  the  wall  about 
45  cm.  and  is  fairly  rigid.  The  pendulum,  B,  140  cm.  long, 

training  in  aviation.  They  were  keenly  interested  in  aviation  problems  and  cooperated 
whole-heartedly,  as  did  also  the  officials  at  the  ground  school.  Although  about  65 
men  were  measured,  the  government  found  it  imperative  to  send  many  of  these  to 
Europe  immediately  upon  their  having  finished  at  the  ground  school,  and  they  therefore 
received  the  flying  training  abroad.  Most  energetic  efforts  were  made  by  Professor 
E.  L.  Thorndike  to  secure  the  flying  scores  for  these  men  on  whom  Drs.  H.  E.  Burtt, 
L.  T.  Troland,  and  myself  had  worked.  Scores  for  26  were  finally  obtained  and  it  is  for 
these  that  the  correlation  mentioned  was  found. 


A  PURSUIT  PENDULUM 


363 


FIG.  I.  Diagram  of  the  pursuit  pendulum.  A,  wall  bracket;  B,  pendulum 
carrying  reservoir,  E.  Gauge,  F,  determines  volume  of  liquid  in  reservoir.  C, 
adjustable  weight  regulating  pendulum's  period.  C,  wooden  frame  clamped  to  sink, 
D.  Nozzle,  H,  of  pendulum  held  by  catch,  AT,  against  rubber  tubing,  /,  until  released 
by  fall  of  hammer,  L,  hinged  at  M.  Short  section  of  chain,  N,  determines  lift  of 
hammer.  0,  cup  of  limited  diameter,  in  which  the  expelled  liquid  is  to  be  collected 
by  the  subject  under  test.  P,  position  at  which  cup,  0,  is  held  at  start.  Q,  short- 
stop for  ending  the  catch. 


364  WALTER  R.  MILES 

is  suspended  by  two  screw  eyes.  Its  shaft  is  continuous 
through  the  reservoir  and  is  very  stiff,  being  made  of  sections 
of  galvanized-iron  pipe  (regular  |-inch  inside  diameter).  The 
reservoir,  E,  a  i-gallon  galvanized-iron  oil  can,  surrounds 
the  shaft  and  is  firmly  secured  and  made  leak-tight  by  the 
use  of  a  "railing  flange"  soldered  to  its  bottom.  As  the 
reservoir  is  located  about  midway  the  length  of  the  pendulum, 
the  head  of  water  changes  but  little  with  the  decreasing  level 
in  the  can.  An  adjustable  weight,  G,  of  about  4  kilograms 
allows  for  regulation  of  the  pendulum's  period  and  makes 
the  position  of  the  center  of  mass  much  less  dependent  upon 
the  exact  amount  of  liquid  in  the  reservoir.  Openings  are 
arranged  in  the  pipe  shaft  on  a  level  with  the  floor  of  the  can 
and  air  vents  are  placed  above.  The  water  flows  very  freely 
from  the  reservoir,  and  at  the  lower  end  of  the  shaft  is  reduced 
to  a  stream  3  mm.  in  diameter  by  the  nozzle,  H. 

A  simple  arrangement  for  retaining  and  releasing  the 
pendulum  is  shown  in  Fig.  I  and  separately  illustrated  by  a 
top  view  in  Fig.  2.  The  wooden  frame,  C,  is  clamped  to  one 
end  of  the  sink,  D,  at  such  a  height  that  when  the  orifice,  H, 
is  slipped  up  on  a  cushion,  made  of  a  short  horizontal  section 
of  rubber  tubing,  /,  a  closure  is  made  which  is  practically 
leak-tight.  A  catch  at  K  retains  the  pendulum  in  this  position 
until  the  fall  of  the  rubber-headed  hammer,  Z,,  hinged  at  M. 
The  hammer  is  lifted  by  the  operator  and  held  in  a  nearly 
upright  position,  determined  by  a  short  section  of  chain 
(see  N,  Fig.  i).  It  is  released  on  verbal  signal  from  the 
subject  and  requires  0.3  second  to  fall  and  start  the  pendulum. 
This  method  of  release  corresponds  to  common  industrial 
operation  and  the  reactor,  especially  a  subject  without  psycho- 
logical training,  likes  it  better  than  having  the  start  occur  at 
some  arbitrary  and  more  or  less  unexpected  time  beyond  his 
control. 

The  cups  in  which  the  subject  is  to  catch  the  expelled 
liquid  (see  0,  Fig.  i)  are  made  of  thin-walled  brass  tubing, 
19  mm.  (regular  f-inch  tube)  inside  diameter  and  nearly  22 
cm.  long.  At  the  start  a  cup  is  held  at  position  P,  against  the 
wooden  frame,  nearly  vertical  from  and  about  2  cm.  lower 


A   PURSUIT  PENDULUM 


365 


than  the  orifice,  H.  No  water  leaks  into  the  cup  and  it  is 
possible  to  begin  the  hand 
movement  almost  in  register 
with  the  pendulum.  While 
the  subject  follows  the  pen- 
dulum to  the  right,  the  oper- 
ator turns  the  short-stop,  Q, 
from  position  I  into  position 
2.  (See  Fig.  2.)  This  metal 
screen  stops  the  return  move- 
ment of  the  cup  at  a  distance 
of  2  cm.  in  front  of  position 
P  and  thus  gives  the  operator 
a  little  space  within  which  to 
catch  the  pendulum  and  re- 
place it  on  /  without  spill- 
ing liquid  into  the  cup,  as 
otherwise  an  error  would  be 
introduced  in  the  result.1 
With  two  liters  of  water  in 

.  i  .    .  i  .     ,     r  .1  F'G-  2.    Top  view  of  the  arrangement 

the  reservoir  the  period  of  the    for  retaining  and  releasing  the  j^™ 

pendulum  for  a  double  swing    H,  pendulum  nozzle  pressed  by  the  rubber 
is  just  2  Seconds.      Naturally     tube»    /»  to   form  leak-tight    closure;   K, 

this   time  will  increase  some-   hook  by  which  pendulum  is  held  in  posi- 

tion  until  A  is  depressed  by  the  hammer, 

what  as  water  is  lost  and  the 
center  of  gravity  lowered. 
Practically,  the  change  is  of  no 
consequence  to  the  test,  as  we 
find  that  with  two  liters  of  wa- 


Scalc 


10 


L,  which  is  hinged  at  M;  short-stop,  Q,  at 
an  appropriate  time  is  turned  into  posi- 
tion 2  in  order  to  cut  the  return  pursuit 
slightly  short  and  allow  space  in  which  the 
experimenter  may  catch  the  pendulum. 


ter  20  v.  d.  require  40  seconds,  while  with  one  liter  40.3  seconds 
are  required,  and  when  the  reservoir  and  shaft  are  empty 
40.9  seconds  are  required.  Thus,  for  testing  purposes  the 
period  of  swing  may  be  regarded  as  independent  of  the 

1  Another  source  of  error  must  be  guarded  against  with  the  cooperation  of  the 
subject.  He  should  be  cautioned  not  to  slip  the  cup  up  over  the  nozzle  of  the  pendulum 
or,  indeed,  to  bump  the  cup  against  the  nozzle  and  thus  interfere  with  its  motion. 
The  stream  of  liquid  does  not  spray  out  and  there  is  no  advantage,  from  this  standpoint, 
in  having  the  mouth  of  the  cup  very  near  the  pendulum.  This  requirement  not  to 
touch  the  pendulum  with  the  cup  is  a  part  of  the  coordination,  but  unfortunately 
does  not  show  in  the  objective  results. 


366  WALTER  R.  MILES 

amount  of  liquid  in  the  tank.  The  amount  of  head  of  the 
liquid  and  the  size  of  the  orifice  were  arranged  with  the  idea 
that  50  c.c.  should  be  the  possible  catch  per  double  swing. 
With  2  liters  in  the  reservoir  at  the  start,  it  is  found  that  at  the 
first  double  swing  the  subject  can  catch,  possibly,  50.4  c.c. 
and  at  the  tenth  succeeding  catch  49.7  c.c.  For  eight  succes- 
sive trials  the  amount  delivered  is  thus  within  I  per  cent, 
of  50  c.c.  It  has  seemed  satisfactory  to  replenish  the  water 
every  five  or  ten  trials.  If  the  subject  is  catching  nearly  all 
the  liquid  expelled,  the  opening  in  the  cup  should  be  reduced. 
A  gauge,  F  (Fig.  i),  on  the  side  of  the  tank  makes  it  a  simple 
matter,  when  introducing  water  at  the  opening  in  the  top 
of  the  reservoir,  to  determine  that  the  volume  of  water  shall 
be  up  to  2  liters.  During  the  swing  the  orifice  of  the  pendu- 
lum, as  used  in  the  collection  of  the  data  presented  below, 
moved  a  horizontal  distance  to  the  right  of  70  cm.  This  is  a 
fairly  large  excursion,  but  most  adults  can  follow  the  move- 
ment without  swaying  of  the  body,  if  they  so  desire. 

More  complex  arrangements  of  such  pursuit  apparatus 
naturally  suggested  themselves,  for  example,  the  pendulum 
might  be  made  the  long  arm  of  a  siphon.  An  orifice,  not  a 
part  of  a  pendulum,  might  be  carried  on  a  belt  and  given  a 
complicated  series  of  movements,  prolonging  the  pursuit  and 
requiring  coordination  for  forward  and  backward  as  well  as 
for  lateral  displacements.1  After  the  experience  with  the 
ocular-pursuit  measurement  it  was  assumed,  however,  that 
in  trying  to  contribute  to  the  problem  of  selecting  aviation 
pilot  material  the  simpler  the  test  apparatus  the  more  service- 
able it  might  possibly  become.  Therefore  this  model  was 
made  independent  of  electrical  features,  did  not  require 
running  water  GT  a  sink,  could  be  filled  by  hand  from  a  pitcher 
and  could  be  arranged  over  a  table  or  inclined  trough,  as 
the  operator's  conveniences  might  permit.2 

1  In  a  personal  communication  Professor  Carl  E.  Seashore  informs  me  that,  after 
trying  the  original  test  at  the  Nutrition  Laboratory,  he  has  arranged  a  very  successful 
combination  for  testing  motor  ability  to  perform  circular  pursuit  movements,  by  using 
a  phonograph  motor,  a  time-interrupted  circuit,  and  an  electric  counter. 

2  A  criticism  which  may  be  raised  against  the  quantitative  score  which  the  appa- 
ratus makes  possible  is  that  this  score  is  not  a  sufficiently  graduated  result.     Prac- 


A  PURSUIT  PENDULUM  367 

In  practice  successive  catches  can  follow  each  other  rather 
rapidly,  their  speed  being  largely  determined  by  the  quickness 
of  the  subject's  motions  in  replacing  and  taking  up  the  cups 
and  the  promptness  of  his  verbal  signals  for  release  of  the 
pendulum.'  Twenty-five  trials  are  easily  made  in  five  min- 
utes. The  25  cups  stand  in  order,  as  at  R  in  Fig.  3,  being 
conveniently  held  in  a  box  frame,  S.  Each  fifth  cup  has  a 
black  band  near  the  top  serving  in  the  test  as  a  signal  to  the 
operator  to  replenish  the  water  in  the  tank.  If  there  is  no 
time  immediately  after  the  test  to  measure  the  results,  the 
cover,  V,  is  placed  over  the  open  ends  of  the  cups,  the  name, 
date  and  hour  are  noted  at  £7,  and  the  box  is  set  aside. 

In  measuring  the  results  it  is  tedious  to  empty  each  cup 
separately  into  a  small  graduate  and  so  determine  the  volume 
of  liquid.  Since  the  cups  are  all  of  the  same  inside  diameter 
(as  nearly  so  as  brass  tubing  is  commercially  made)  and  all 
have  the  same  inside  depth,  a  graduated  scale,  W,  cut  from 
thin  aluminum  sheet  attached  to  a  cork  float  can  be  intro- 
duced into  the  mouth  of  each  cup  as  these  are  held  con- 
veniently side  by  side. in  the  box  frame,  S,  and  the  volume  of 
liquid  can  thus  be  very  quickly  determined  for  the  successive 
catches.  After  the  catches  have  been  individually  measured, 
provided  that  such  analytical  data  are  desired  for  securing  a 
measure  of  variability,  the  frame,  S,  is  grasped  in  such  a  way 
that  the  rubber  tube,  T,  attached  to  the  hinged  door  on  the 
front,  presses  against  all  25  cups  so  that  their  contents  may 
be  emptied  and  drained  at  once  into  the  inclined  V-shaped 
trough,  X,  and  so  into  the  large  graduate,  Y.  The  total 
score  is  in  this  way  very  readily  secured. 

If  a  good  subject  reaches  such  a  degree  of  skill  that,  for 
example,  he  regularly  catches  more  than  80  or  90  per  cent. 

tically,  it  makes  no  difference  whether  the  pursuit  is  so  accurate  that  the  stream  of 
water  goes  in  at  the  center  of  the  opening  in  the  cup  or  over  at  one  side,  just  so  long 
as  the  whole  stream  is  collected.  Since  the  edge  of  the  cup  is  sharp,  tapered  from  the 
outside,  if  the  stream  strikes  here  it  will  be  divided,  part  collected  and  part  lost. 
With  a  slower-moving  pendulum,  a  somewhat  larger  orifice,  and  a  cup  with  the  mouth 
the  same  size  as  the  orifice,  probably  an  arrangement  could  be  made  so  that  the  subject 
could  always  catch  a  part  of  the  liquid  and  thus  small  inaccuracies  of  pursuit  would 
more  properly  be  represented  in  the  result. 


368 


WALTER  R.  MILES 


w 


0 


CENTIMETERS 


FIG.  3.  Arrangement  of  the  cups  in  a  way  convenient  for  measuring  the  quantity 
of  liquid,  by  simple  accessory  apparatus.  R,  bank  of  cups  in  carrying  frame,  S;  F, 
cover  for  cups;  U,  pad  for  noting  name,  date,  and  hour;  T,  rubber  tube  attached  to 
hinged  door  of  frame,  S,  which  is  pressed  against  cups  in  emptying;  W,  measuring 
float  graduated  in  c.c.;  X  and  Y,  inclined  trough  and  large  graduate  for  receiving  the 
contents  of  a  whole  bank  of  cups  emptied  at  once;  Z,  collar  to  reduce  the  opening 
at  the  mouth  of  the  cups,  for  especially  expert  subjects. 


A  PURSUIT  PENDULUM  369 

of  the  possible  catch,  the  task  may  of  course  be  made  more 
difficult  by  decreasing  the  effective  opening  in  the  cups.  A 
collar,  Z,  can  be  slipped  into  and  withdrawn  from  each  cup 
by  the  subject  as  he  uses  them  in  turn  and  thus  the  opening 
may  be  reduced  to  10  mm.  or  to  whatever  size  is  deemed 
desirable  to  make  the  task  satisfactorily  difficult. 

It  is  probable  that  any  investigator  who  arranges  such 
an  apparatus  as  is  here  described  will  not  make  it  an  exact 
duplicate.  Nevertheless  illustrative  data  are  of  value  in 
supplementing  the  description  of  the  apparatus,  as  they  give 
an  idea  of  the  type  of  results  that  may  be  expected  from  its 
use.  In  December,  1918,  and  January,  1919,  considerable 
data  for  this  test  were  obtained  on  a  group  of  staff  members 
of  the  Nutrition  Laboratory,  including  ten  women  and  eight 
men.1  The  pursuit  test  was  given  on  35  days,  usually  suc- 
cessive except  for  Sundays,  and  the  amount  of  practice  was 
20  catches  per  day.  At  that  time  the  equipment  of  cups 
consisted  of  two  banks  of  ten  each.  It  was  hardly  feasible 
that  each  individual  should  be  tested  at  exactly  the  same 
time  on  each  day,  but  care  was  taken  not  to  measure  subjects 
when  they  were  fatigued  or  otherwise  indisposed.2 

The  average  results  for  a  group  of  18  adults  are  shown 
graphically  in  Fig.  4.  Each  plotted  point  on  the  curves 
represents  360  catches,  i.e.,  20  catches  by  each  of  18  subjects. 
Each  of  the  two  groups  of  ten  catches  made  by  a  subject  on  a 
single  day  was  dealt  with  separately  when  obtaining  the 
average  and  standard  deviation.  This  was  done  to  show  the 
progress  made  during  the  day.  As  might  be  expected,  the 
second  ten  catches  almost  invariably  averaged  I  or  2  c.c. 
higher  than  the  first  ten  and  the  variability  was  usually 
smaller.  For  this  brief  paper  we  have  averaged  the  two  means 

1  The  collection  of  these  data,  including  its  tabulation  and  elaboration,  was  success- 
fully accomplished  by  an  assistant,  Mr.  E.  S.  Mills,  whose  care  and  cooperation  are 
gratefully  acknowledged. 

1  In  this  early  practice  experiment  it  was  thought  that  the  subject  should  execute 
the  pursuit  by  an  arm  movement  not  supplemented  by  a  body  movement.  Therefore 
two  rods  were  arranged  to  extend  from  the  sink  and  to  be  brought  in  contact  with  the 
individual  on  both  sides,  somewhat  above  the  waist.  These  rods,  while  not  hindering 
the  trunk  from  twisting,  obviated  the  subject's  swaying  from  side  to  side.  Probably 
this  restriction  is  unnecessary.  It  has  not  been  used  in  later  measurements. 


37° 


WALTER  R.  MILES 


and  the  two  coefficients  of  variability  secured  for  each  of  the 
1  8  individuals  on  each  day  and  have  employed  these  18 
quantities  to  obtain  the  average  represented  by  eachjplotted 
point  on  the  curves  shown  in  Fig.  4. 


GROUP  PRACTICE  ON  PURSUIT  PENDULUM. 


50 
48 

46 
44 


42 
40 
38 
36 


I 


/ 


S7T 


V 


i  Average  cc  per  catch 

Av.  for  men 

Av«  for  women 

Variability  in  percent. 


^AA 


Oavs.2  4  6  8  10  12  14  16  18  20  22  24  26  28  30  32  3436 

FIG.  4.  Curves  showing  average  results  for  ten  women  and  eight  men  tested  on 
35  days  with  20  catches  per  day  practice. 

The  heavy  broken  line  in  the  figure  indicates  the  coefficient 
of  variability  (standard  deviation  divided  by  mean)  in  terms 
of  per  cent.  The  heavy  solid  line  gives  the  average  catch 
in  cubic  centimeters  per  day.  On  the  first  day  the  individual 
averages  ranged  from  8  to  29  c.c.  per  catch  with  a  grand 
average  of  15  c.c.,  which  represents  30  per  cent,  of  the  possible 
catch.  First  trials  by  a  number  of  other  adults  confirm  this 
figure  as  about  what  may  be  expected  for  an  initial  per- 


A  PURSUIT  PENDULUM  37 » 

formance,  when  the  subject  seriously  tries  the  test  and 
consistently  makes  20  or  25  catches.  The  curve  showing 
the  average  catch  per  day  rises  rapidly  on  successive  days  to 
20,  23,  25,  26,  28,  and,  on  the  tenth  day,  to  31  c.c.  representing 
62  per  cent,  of  the  possible  catch.  Thus,  on  the  tenth  day 
of  20  trials  the  average  efficiency  has  doubled  over  what  it 
was  at  the  start.  After  25  days  more  of  such  practice  the 
average  increase  above  this  level  is  only  7  c.c.,  bringing  the 
figure  to  38  c.c.,  which  is  about  75  per  cent,  of  the  possible 
catch.  The  practice  curve  is  very  regular  in  form  and  shows 
no  definite  indication  of  orthodox  plateaux,  and  it  is  evident 
that  the  chief  part  of  the  rise  due  to  practice  can  be  quickly 
worked  off  by  200  or  300  catches,  if  it  is  desirable  to  bring 
the  individual  up  toward  the  stage  of  a  practice  level.  The 
curve  for  the  coefficient  of  variability  is  practically  an  exact 
counterpart  in  form  to  that  for  the  average  catch.  At  the 
beginning  the  variation  between  catches  equals  about  34 
per  cent,  and  at  the  tenth  day,  when  the  average  catch  has 
doubled,  the  variability  has  decreased  to  19  per  cent,  or 
not  far  from  one  half,  and  by  the  end  of  the  series  has  de- 
creased to  about  14  per  cent.1 

It  is  recognized  that  the  group  of  subjects  employed  in 
this  experiment  was  relatively  small  and  it  is  hardly  justifiable 
to  draw  conclusions  regarding  such  matters  as  the  difference 
between  men  and  women  in  their  efficiency  in  executing  such 
a  pursuit  movement.  If  the  individuals  are  ranked  on  the 
basis  of  their  total  average  catch  per  day,  it  is  found  that  of 
the  better  nine  there  were  six  men  and  three  women,  while  in 
the  poorer  half  of  the  group  there  were  two  men  and  seven 
women.  There  were  three  women  poorer  than  the  poorest 
man,  but  only  one  man  did  better  than  the  most  efficient 
woman.  The  average  difference  between  the  groups  of  eight 
men  and  ten  women  is  shown  in  Fig.  4  in  the  light  line  curves, 
which  are  above  and  below  the  curve  for  the  general  average 

1  The  coefficient  of  variability  for  other  neuro-muscular  tests  may  be  found  by 
referring  to  Benedict,  Miles,  Roth,  and  Smith,  Carnegie  Inst.  Wash.  Pub.  No.  280, 1919, 
pp.  551  et  seq.  Examples  which  may  be  mentioned  are:  eye-movement  speed,  9  per 
cent.;  eye  reactions,  19  percent.;  word  reactions,  9  per  cent.;  and  electrical  threshold 
about  6  per  cent. 


37*  WALTER  R.  MILES 

catch  (heavy  solid  line).  The  curves  for  the  men  and  for 
the  women  are  fairly  smooth,  and  maintain  about  a  uniform 
distance  apart,  the  men  on  the  average  catching  4  cc.  more 
than  the  women.1 

Individual  practice  curves,  such  as  illustrated  in  Fig.  5, 
are  naturally  less  smooth  than  the  average  for  the  whole 
group.  In  Fig.  5  results  for  one  of  the  most  efficient  and 
also  for  one  of  the  least  capable  subjects  have  been  com- 
bined. Subject  C  made  very  rapid  progress,  starting  with 
21  c.c.  and  rising  to  28,  30,  32.4,  35.8,  and  36.7  c.c.  on  the 
next  six  successive  days.  (See  Curve  i.)  There  is  a  slight 
decline  on  the  seventh  and  eighth  days  and  quite  a  definite 
decrease  on  the  ninth  day.  The  fluctuations  usually  range 
from  i  to  3  c.c.  Undoubtedly  these  variations  in  the  average 
would  have  been  smaller  had  the  number  of  trials  on  each 
day  been  larger.  For  a  fairly  long  period,  that  is,  from  the 
tenth  to  the  twenty-ninth  day,  the  average  for  Subject  C  is 
very  close  to  37  c.c.,  which  is  74  per  cent,  of  the  possible 
catch.  The  performance  during  this  period  may  conceivably 
be  classed  as  a  plateau,  for  there  is  undoubtedly  an  indication 
of  a  definite  stage  of  improvement  following  it,  during  the 
last  six  days.  The  coefficient  of  variability  for  Subject  C 
(Curve  2)  shows  rapid  improvement  at  first,  corresponding  to 
his  improvement  in  the  amount  of  the  catch  up  to  the  seventh 
day.  Beyond  this  time  there  are  fluctuations,  some  of  them 
quite  large.  From  the  seventh  to  the  twentieth  day,  inclu- 
sive, the  average  variability  is  about  14  per  cent.,  while 
from  the  twenty-first  to  the  thirty-sixth  day,  although  there 
are  several  instances  as  low  as  8  or  10  per  cent.,  the  average 
is  12.5  per  cent. 

Subject  R'did  poorly  at  the  start,  with  an  average  catch  of 
8.5  c.c.  (see  Curve  3)  and  a  variability  of  54  per  cent,  (see 
Curve  4).  Furthermore,  poor  learning  ability  is  demon- 
strated by  the  results  for  the  third  and  fifth  days,  when  the 

1  Nothing  extensive  has  been  done  with  children.  Probably  in  working  with 
them  the  excursion  of  the  pendulum  should  be  reduced  somewhat  from  the  70-centi- 
meter swing  employed  with  adults.  However,  preliminary  trials  with  the  apparatus 
as  arranged  for  adults  indicate  that  a  nine-year-old  child  can  catch  at  the  beginning 
from  IO  to  12  c.c.  and  a  six-year-old  child  from  5  to  6  c.c. 


A  PURSUIT  PENDULUM 


373 


average  was  in  each  case  slightly  lower  than  on  the  preceding 
days.  The  results  show  considerable  progress  between  the 
fifth  and  the  twentieth  days,  a  change  from  15.5  to  29  c.c. 
with  some  decrease  in  the  variability,  although  the  fluctua- 
tions here  are  quite  large.  The  average  for  the  last  five  days 


g&INQIVIDUAL  PRACTICE  ON  PURSUIT  PENDULUM. 


12 
10 

8 
Days  2    46    6    10   i  *  14.  re  18  20  22  24  2ff  28  30    2  34  36 

FIG.  5.  Individual  practice  curves  showing  comparison  between  two  subjects. 
Curve  I  shows  the  average  catch  per  day  and  Curve  2  the  average  variability  per  day 
for  one  of  the  most  skilful  subjects.  Curves  3  and  4  show  the  average  catch  and 
variability  per  day,  respectively,  for  one  of  the  least  capable  subjects. 

is  32.3  c.c.,  or  approximately  65  per  cent,  of  the  possible 
catch,  with  an  average  coefficient  of  variability  for  these  same 
days  of  about  18  per  cent.,  in  contrast  to  the  75  per  cent, 
catch  and  14  per  cent,  variability  for  the  total  group  of  adults. 


374 


WALTER  R.  MILES 


To  illustrate  a  series  of  measurements  made  on  an  indi- 
vidual for  the  purpose  of  investigating  the  effect  of  some 
introduced  factor  on  neuro-muscular  efficiency  the  data  in 
Table  I  are  given.  The  pursuit-pendulum  test  was  one  of  a 
number  of  measurements  used  in  a  recent  alcohol  experiment. 
This  fragment  of  data  is  introduced  for  the  sole  purpose  of 
illustrating  the  pursuit  pendulum  results  and  in  no  sense  as  a 
contribution  to  alcohol  literature.  The  complete  data  are 
being  elaborated  for  later  publication  as  an  alcohol  research. 
The  series  of  eight  tests  required  30  minutes.  Following  a 
light  lunch,  the  subject  carried  through  this  series  two  times 
in  succession.  At  the  end  of  the  second  period  he  drank  I 

TABLE  I 

THE  PURSUIT  PENDULUM  AS  A  TEST  OF  NEURO-MUSCULAR  EFFICIENCY. 
RESULTS  SHOWING  THE  EFFECT  OF  ALCOHOL 


Date 

Successive  Half-hour  Periods 

i 

2 

Drink 

3 

4 

5 

XT19'9 

Nov.    5       

c.c. 

1,142 
1,170 

1,190 
1,190 

I,2OO 

C.C. 
1,120 

1,152 
1,184 
1,178 

1,180 

I  liter  water 

u       «            « 
«     «          « 

«      «           <( 

C.C. 
I,IIS 
1,176 
1,192 
1,178 
I,2OO 

C.C. 

,HS 
,191 
,200 
,140 
,193 

C.C. 
1,120 

I,l8S 
1,190 
1,148 
1,192 

Nov.    8  

Nov.  19  

Nov.  21  

Nov.  22  

Av  

1,178 
1,1 

1,163 
70 

1,172 

+  2 

i,i74 
+4 

I,l67 

-3 

Nov.    6     

1,178 
1,156 
1,172 

1,173 
1,172 

,150 
,166 
,185 

,173 
,208 

I  liter 
2.75  ale. 
27.5  grams 

«        « 

,092 

,137 
,146 

,130 
,107 

1,108 

1,122 
1,130 

1,043 
I,IO2 

1,096 
i,  066 
1,096 
1,065 

i,i35 

Nov.    7  

Nov.  10  

Nov.  17  

Nov.  18  

Av  

1,170 
1,1 

5.9  per  cen 

1,176 

73 

t. 

1,122 
-51 

53 

I,IOI 
-72 

76 

1,092 
-81 

78 

Av.  loss, 

1,172 

4-5 

1,172 

6-5 

1,172 
6.7 

liter  of  water,  or  i  liter  of  water  in  which  27.5  grams  of  ethyl 
alcohol  had  been  diluted.  The  quantity  and  temperature  of 
the  liquid  were  not  varied.  Fifteen  minutes  were  quite  suffi- 
cient in  which  to  drink  the  liquid.  After  the  liquid  was  taken, 


A  PURSUIT  PENDULUM  375 

the  series  of  measurements  was  repeated  three  times,  that  is, 
periods  3,  4,  and  5  of  the  day.  Table  I  shows  data  for  five 
normal  days,  on  which  only  water  was  taken,  and  for  five 
other  days  on  each  of  which  I  liter  of  a  2.75  per  cent,  alcohol 
mixture  was  consumed.  No  effort  was  made  to  disguise  the 
taste  of  the  alcohol.  The  subject,  an  abstainer  by  habit, 
was  in  the  best  of  physical  condition.  The  values  in  Table  I 
give  the  total  catch  in  cubic  centimeters  for  25  cups,  as 
measured  by  the  method  of  emptying  the  whole  bank  of  cups 
at  once.  (See  Fig.  3.)  The  two  preliminary  periods  for  the 
five  days  on  which  water  only  was  taken  show  total  averages 
of  1,178  c.c.  and  1,163  c-c'j  or  a  combined  preliminary  average 
of  1,170  c.c.  (46.8  c.c.  per  catch),  which  compare  favorably 
with  the  two  preliminary  values,  i.e.,  before  alcohol  was  taken, 
on  the  alcohol  days,  namely,  1,170  c.c.  and  1,176  c.c.,  or  a 
combined  average  of  1,173  c-c-  (46.9  c.c.  per  catch).  Periods 
3,  4,  and  5  show  only  minor  differences  (+  2  c.c.,  +  4  c.c., 
and  —  3  c.c.)  from  the  combined  preliminary  average  in  the 
case  of  normal  days.  On  the  alcohol  days  the  differences  are 
all  minus,  that  is,  less  water  was  caught  after  the  alcohol  was 
taken  by  —  51  c.c.,  —  72  c.c.,  and  —  81  c.c.  for  the  total 
averages.  Subtracting  the  alcohol  differences  from  those  for 
normal  days,  it  is  found  that  53  c.c.,  76  c.c.,  and  78  c.c. 
represent  the  alcohol  effect  for  periods  3,  4,  and  5,  respectively. 
These  decrements  between  normal  and  alcohol  performance, 
on  the  basis  of  1172  (the  grand  average  for  all  preliminary 
trials  on  both  groups  of  days),  equal  4.5,  6.5,  and  6.7  per  cent., 
or  an  average  loss  of  5.9  per  cent.,  which  represents  the 
alcohol  effect  on  this  test  of  coordination.  The  subject  im- 
proved somewhat  between  November  5  and  22,  but  since 
there  is  only  slight  improvement  within  the  day  and  the  water 
and  alcohol  experiments  alternate  with  each  other,  this  prac- 
tice change  is  not  troublesome.  Indeed,  the  data  are  very 
consistent,  e.g.,  at  no  time  following  ingestion  of  alcohol  was 
the  subject  able  to  catch  as  much  as  he  had  in  the  poorer 
preliminary  period  for  the  same  day. 

A  pursuit  coordination  test,  such  as  has  been  here  de- 
scribed, not  only  possesses  the  advantages  of  requiring  very 


376  WALTER  R.  MILES 

simple  apparatus  and  of  securing  quantitative  results  which 
are  immediately  available  without  the  painstaking  reading  of 
records,  but  it  appears  to  have  elements  comparable  to  many 
industrial  operations  where  the  task  not  only  requires  quick 
reaction  but  also  that  a  movement  or  movements  be  executed 
according  to  a  fairly  definite  pattern.  A  reaction  is  usually 
only  the  beginning  of  coordinated  movement  towards  some 
end  or  of  a  series  of  such  coordinations,  and  probably  in  most 
instances  in  practical  life  the  adequacy  with  which  the  series 
of  coordinations  is  carried  through  is  fully  as  important,  if 
not  more  so,  than  the  mere  matter  of  speed  in  initiating  them. 
Especially  would  this  appear  to  be  the  case  in  movements  for 
compensating,  directing,  aiming,  or  otherwise  tending  any 
moving  object,  where  the  pace  and  pattern  are  not  set  entirely 
by  the  subject  himself.  Quickness,  precision,  and  steadiness 
of  movement  have  long  been  tested  in  reference  to  stationary 
objects.  The  pursuit  pendulum  provides  a  simple  means  of 
measuring  these  factors  in  reference  to  a  moving  object  and 
thus  supplements  the  general  psychological  measurement  of 
motor  control  and  capacity.  The  pursuit  test  invariably 
challenges  a  subject's  interest,  but  practically  every  one  finds 
it  more  difficult  than  he  at  first  expects. 


THE    LIMITS   OF    COLOR    SENSITIVITY:    EFFECT 

OF  BRIGHTNESS  OF   PREEXPOSURE  AND 

SURROUNDING  FIELD 

BY  C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 

Bryn  Mawr  College 

INTRODUCTION 

The  difficulty  of  getting  reproducible  results  in  deter- 
minations of  the  color  sensitivity  of  the  peripheral  retina  is  a 
common  complaint  among  clinic  workers.  This  difficulty 
is  so  great  as  to  lead  many  seriously  to  question  the  value 
of  such  determinations  in  the  work  of  diagnosis.  Their  value 
in  diagnosing  and  in  checking  up  the  course  of  some  of  the 
most  serious  affections  of  the  eye  is  readily  conceded,  how- 
ever, provided  the  needed  precision  can  be  attained.  The 
need  of  greater  precision  of  working  in  the  laboratory,  while 
less  important  to  human  welfare,  is  no  less  insistent.  These 
combined  needs  led  us  several  years  ago  to  make  a  study 
of  the  variable  factors  which  influence  the  chromatic  response, 
the  details  of  which  are  still  in  progress.  Some  of  these 
factors  pertain  to  the  control  of  the  stimulus,  some  are  peculiar 
to  the  response  of  the  eye  itself.  All  may  be  standardized 
and  controlled.  The  normal  eye  is  highly  sensitive  and 
complex  in  its  responses  but  not  inherently  erratic.  While 
the  abnormal  eye  may  be  more  erratic,  one  of  the  symptoms 
it  may  be  of  its  abnormality,  there  should  be  so  far  as  we  can 
see  no  essential  difference  in  the  technique  of  the  study  and 
of  the  testing  of  its  functioning.  In  fact  a  characteristic 
difference  in  this  regard,  which  can  be  determined  with 
certainty  only  when  other  variable  factors  are  controlled, 
may  well  be  found  to  serve  as  a  clue  to  an  early  diagnosis  of 
its  abnormality. 

The  variable  factors  which  influence  the  chromatic 
response  of  the  retina  are,  so  far  as  we  have  discovered,  the 
wave-length  and  the  purity  of  the  stimulus,  the  intensity  of 

377 


378  C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 

the  stimulus  and  the  visual  angle,  length  of  exposure  of  the 
eye,  accuracy  and  steadiness  of  fixation,  general  illumination 
and  state  of  adaptation  of  the  retina,  breadth  of  pupil,  and 
the  brightness  of  the  preexposure  and  of  the  field  surrounding 
the  stimulus.  We  have  already  published  considerable  data 
on  the  effect  of  these  factors  in  earlier  papers  (1).  It  will 
be  the  special  purpose  of  the  present  paper  to  deal  with  the 
last  two,  the  brightness  of  the  preexposure  and  of  the  sur- 
rounding field.  A  detailed  explanation  of  the  effect  of  these 
two  factors  on  the  amount  of  the  chromatic  response  has 
been  given  in  the  second  of  the  papers  referred  to  above  (1). 
A  brief  explanation  and  statement  of  principles  will  suffice 
here. 

I.  When  a  small  colored  stimulus,  surrounded  by  a  field, 
for  example,  of  white  or  black  is  viewed,  a  sensation  is  given 
which  consists  of  the  color  mixed  with  black  or  white,  due 
to  a  contrast  sensation  induced  from  the  surrounding  field. 
The  effect  of  fusing  a  color  with  white  or  black  is  twofold. 
(a)  There  is  a  quantitative  effect  due  to  the  inhibition  of  the 
chromatic  excitation  by  the  achromatic.  In  general,  in  the 
central  retina  at  medium  and  high  illuminations,  white 
inhibits  color  the  most,  the  grays  in  order  from  light  to  dark 
next,  and  black  the  least.  Also  the  amount  of  the  inhibitive 
action  varies  with  the  different  colors,  with  the  part  of  the 
retina  at  which  the  stimulation  takes  place,  and  the  state  of 
brightness  adaptation  of  the  retina.  The  amount  of  induc- 
tion depends  upon  the  difference  in  brightness  between  the 
stimulus  and  the  surrounding  field;  it  increases  with  the 
distance  from  the  fovea  and  with  decrease  in  the  general 
illumination;  and,  with  a  given  difference  in  brightness 
between  the  stimulus  and  the  surrounding  field,  it  is  greater 
with  a  white  than  with  a  black  field — also  the  amount  of 
increase  of  induction  with  decrease  of  illumination  and  with 
increase  of  distance  from  the  fovea  is  greater  with  a  white 
than  with  a  black  field.  And  (b)  there  is  also  a  qualitative 
effect.  The  hue  of  certain  colors  is  changed  by  the  action 
of  the  achromatic  excitation.  The  change  is  greatest  when 
the  stimuli  are  blue  and  yellow.  For  example,  yellow  when 


THE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY  379 

mixed  with  black  gives  a  greenish  yellow  which  with  the 
right  proportion  of  components  may  become  an  olive  green; 
and  blue  when  mixed  with  white  or  light  gray  gives  a  sensa- 
tion of  reddish  blue. 

2.  When  making  the  color  observation  in  the  peripheral 
retina,  the  observer  is  given  a  short  period  of  preparation 
before  the  stimulus  is  exposed,  in  which  to  obtain  and  hold  a 
steady  and  accurate  fixation.  This  introduces  the  factor  of 
preexposure  for,  during  this  period  of  preparation,  the  area 
which  is  to  be  stimulated  by  color  receives  a  previous  stimu- 
lation. This  previous  stimulation,  when  it  differs  in  bright- 
ness from  the  color,  gives  a  brightness  after-image  which 
mixes  with  the  color  sensation  and  both  reduces  its  saturation 
and  modifies  its  color  tone.  If  the  preexposure  is  lighter 
than  the  stimulus  color,  it  adds  by  after-image  a  certain 
amount  of  black  to  the  succeeding  color  impression;  if 
darker,  it  adds  a  certain  amount  of  white.  Since  both  white 
and  black  as  after  effect  reduce  the  sensitivity  to  color, 
the  eye  is  rendered  more  sensitive  when  no  after-image  is 
given,  that  is  when  the  preexposure  is  of  the  same  bright- 
ness as  the  color.  The  preexposure  should,  therefore,  be  a 
gray  of  the  brightness  of  the  color.  No  brightness  after- 
image will  then  be  added  to  the  succeeding  color  impression 
to  modify  either  its  saturation  or  color  tone.  The  only 
brightness  change  acting  upon  it  will  be  due  to  the  slight 
adaptation  to  this  gray  during  the  short  time  of  preexposure. 
Even  closing  the  eye,  as  is  frequently  done  before  stimulating, 
is  equivalent  to  giving  a  black  preexposure. 

The  general  principle  then  is  clear.  There  remains  only 
to  explain  why  in  the  peripheral  retina  the  short  preexposure 
which  takes  place  while  the  eye  is  obtaining  a  steady  fixation 
has  so  much  effect  on  the  color  stimulation  immediately 
following.  Two  reasons  are  found  for  this,  (a)  The  after- 
image reaction  of  the  peripheral  retina  is  extremely  quick. 
While  some  slight  variation  is  found  at  different  angles  of 
excentricity,  in  general  the  peripheral  after-image  seems  to 
reach  its  maximal  intensity  with  a  few  seconds  of  stimulation. 
This  amount  of  time  is  usually  consumed  in  obtaining  fixa- 


C.  E.   FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 

tion  and  preparing  for  the  stimulation,  hence  in  each  observa- 
tion there  is  fused  with  the  color  sensation  about  as  strong  a 
brightness  after-image  as  can  be  aroused.  For  this  reason 
alone  it  is  readily  seen  why  the  brightness  of  the  preexposure 
is  of  so  much  greater  consequence  in  the  peripheral  than  in 
the  central  retina,  where  the  maximal  intensity  of  after- 
image is,  roughly  speaking,  obtained  from  a  stimulation  of 
40-60  seconds  or  longer.  (&)  There  is  apparently  no  latent 
period  in  case  of  the  peripheral  after-image.  It  flashes  out 
at  full  intensity  immediately  upon  the  cessation  of  the  stimu- 
lation. Thus  there  is  no  possibility  of  escaping  the  full 
effect  of  the  brightness  after-image  on  the  stimulus  color  as 
might  happen  in  the  central  retina  where  the  latent  period 
obtains,  if  there  were  a  very  short  exposure  to  stimulus  color. 

CONDITIONS  UNDER  WHICH  THE  WORK  WAS  DONE 

The  determinations  were  made  in  an  optics  room  of  the 
type  described  in  previous  articles  (2).  The  illumination 
was  kept  constant  at  a  value  at  the  point  of  work  of  42  foot- 
candles,  vertical  component;  31.2  foot-candles,  45  degree 
component;  and  12.5  foot-candles,  horizontal  component. 
Three  investigations  were  conducted. 

I.  A  determination  was  made  of  the  effect  on  the  apparent 
limits  of  color  sensitivity  of  variations  in  the  brightness  of 
the  field  surrounding  the  stimulus.  Three  fields  were  used: 
the  standard  white  of  the  Hering  series,  giving  a  surface 
brightness  at  the  intensity  of  illumination  used  of  0.0209 
candle-power  per  sq.  in.;  the  standard  black  of  the  series, 
giving  a  surface  brightness  of  0.00094  candle-power  per  sq.  in. 
and  grays  of  the  brightness  of  the  color  at  the  limits  of  sensi- 
tivity in  each  of  the  meridians  investigated.  These  grays 
ranged  in  brightness  in  the  different  meridians  from  0.00350 
to  0.00395  CP-  Per  scl-  'in'  f°r  red;  °-OI445  to  0.0189  for 
yellow;  0.01058  to  0.01185  f°r  green;  and  0.00289  to  0.00366 
for  blue.  In  order  to  study  the  effect  of  brightness  of  sur- 
rounding field  in  separation,  the  preexposure  was  in  each 
case  made  of  the  brightness  of  the  color  at  the  point  of 
investigation. 


THE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY  381 

2.  A  determination  was  made  of  the  effect  on  the  apparent 
limits  of  sensitivity  of  varying  the  brightness  of  the  preex- 
posure.     Again  three  brightnesses  were  used:    the  standard 
Hering  white;   the  standard  Hering  black;    and  grays  of  the 
brightness  of  the  color  at  the  limits  of  sensitivity  in  each  of 
the  meridians  investigated.     The  photometric  value  of  the 
white,  black  and  the  range  of  grays  for  each  of  the  colors  are 
given  in  I  above.     In  this  series  of  experiments  the  surround- 
ing field  was  made  in  each  case  of  the  same  brightness  as  the 
color  at  the  point  of  investigation. 

3.  A  determination  was  made  of  the  combined  effect  of 
preexposure  and  surrounding  field  on  the  apparent  limits  of 
sensitivity.     The  same  three  brightnesses  were  used  as  in 
the  preceding  investigations.     In  these  cases,  however,  the 
surrounding  field  and  preexposure  were  both  made  of  the 
same   brightness,   i.e.,   both    white,    black   or   grays   of   the 
brightness  of  the  color  at  the  limits  of  sensitivity  in  the 
meridians  investigated. 

Since  the  results  obtained  were  meant  only  to  be  com- 
parative of  the  effect  of  varying  given  factors,  it  was  deemed 
sufficient  to  make  the  determinations  with  pigment  stimuli. 
So  obtained  the  results  are  moreover  more  nearly  what  may 
be  expected  in  the  work  of  the  clinic.  The  standard  red, 
yellow,  green  and  blue  of  the  Hering  series  of  papers  were 
used.  The  work  was  done  with  the  rotary  campimeter 
described  in  previous  papers  (3).  With  the  control  of 
surrounding  field  afforded  by  the  campimeter,  this  apparatus 
combines  the  rotary  features  of  the  perimeter.  Without 
some  apparatus  combining  both  of  these  features  we  have 
not  found  it  possible  to  make  a  determination  of  the  apparent 
limits  of  sensitivity  with  an  adequate  control  of  the  bright- 
ness of  the  surrounding  field  and  of  the  preexposure.  The 
need  of  an  apparatus  in  the  clinic  by  means  of  which  this 
control  may  be  accomplished  is  obvious.  Not  only  is  it 
impossible  to  secure  an  adequate  control  of  these  two  im- 
portant factors  by  means  of  the  standard  perimeter,  but  a 
very  great  practical  difficulty  is  encountered  in  daylight  work 
in  getting  an  equal  illumination  of  the  pigment  stimulus  at 


382  C.  E.   FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 

different  points  in  the  field  of  vision  and  a  constant  illumina- 
tion from  sitting  to  sitting.  In  case  of  artificial  illumination 
the  latter  difficulty  can  perhaps  be  eliminated  with  care; 
but  the  task  of  securing  an  equal  effective  illumination  of  the 
stimulus  from  point  to  point  in  the  same  meridian  and  of 
corresponding  points  in  different  meridians  is  practically 
impossible  in  case  of  any  perimeter  now  in  use,  because  of 
the  unequal  shading  of  the  moving  stimulus  by  the  observer, 
the  varying  inequalities  of  the  incident  and  reflecting  angles, 
etc.  In  case  of  the  instrument  used  by  us  these  difficulties 
are  minimized  by  using  a  stationary  pigment  surface,  20  x  20 
cm.  placed  with  special  reference  to  evenness  of  illumination 
at  some  constant  distance  (in  the  present  work  45  cm.) 
behind  the  stimulus  opening  in  the  campimeter  and  by 
securing  the  excentric  stimulation  by  shifting  the  fixation 
from  point  to  point  along  an  arm  specially  constructed  for 
the  purpose.  For  other  points  of  criticism  of  the  perimeter 
as  an  instrument  of  precision  for  either  light  or  dark  room 
work  the  reader  is  referred  to  former  papers.  The  preex- 
posure  was  secured  by  inserting  the  appropriate  pigment 
surface  between  the  stimulus  card  and  the  stimulus  opening 
in  the  campimeter.  The  duration  of  the  preexposure  was 
kept  constant  at  2  seconds.  The  stimulus  opening  in  the 
campimeter  was  15  mm.  in  diameter.  At  the  eye,  25  cm. 
distant,  this  subtended  a  visual  angle  of  3°  26'. 

The  more  important  results  given  in  this  paper  have  been 
confirmed  repeatedly  both  in  the  graduate  and  under- 
graduate work  in  our  laboratory.  The  determination  of  the 
effect  of  the  brightness  of  preexposure  and  surrounding  field 
on  the  apparent  limits  of  color  sensitivity  has  in  fact  formed 
a  part  of  the-drill  work  in  the  undergraduate  laboratory  for 
several  years.  Space  will  be  taken  here  for  the  results  of 
only  one  observer — the  observer  whose  results  have  been 
given  in  the  preceding  studies  on  the  color  sensitivity  of  the 
peripheral  retina. 

As  has  already  been  indicated,  the  effect  of  brightness  of 
the  preexposure  and  of  the  surrounding  field  falls  under  the 
general  heading  of  the  inhibitive  action  of  the  achromatic 


THE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY  383 

excitation  on  the  chromatic.  This  action  takes  place  how- 
ever the  achromatic  excitation  is  aroused — by  the  admixture 
of  white  light,  by  after-image,  by  contrast,  etc.  It  may  be 
strikingly  and  conveniently  demonstrated  to  large  numbers 
at  once  in  the  following  lecture  room  experiments,  (a)  Set 
up  side  by  side  on  three  color  mixers  discs  made  up  of  180 
degrees  of  color,  e.g.  blue,  and  180  degrees  of  white,  180 
degrees  of  blue  and  180  degrees  of  gray  of  the  brightness  of 
the  blue,  and  180  degrees  of  blue  and  180  degrees  of  black. 
When  mixed,  although  the  eye  receives  the  same  amount  of 
colored  light  from  each  set  of  discs,  the  mixture  with  black 
seems  to  have  lost  but  very  little,  if  any,  color;  the  mixture 
with  white  is  a  lavendar  with  but  little  color;  and  the  mix- 
ture with  gray  of  the  brightness  of  the  color,  in  this  case  a 
very  dark  gray,  is  less  saturated  than  the  mixture  with  black. 
When  different  grays  are  used  the  saturation  decreases  appar- 
ently in  graded  steps  as  white  is  approached.  The  demon- 
stration can  be  made  on  a  single  color  mixer  by  compounding 
the  color  disc  with  white,  black  and  gray  discs  of  different 
breadths  or  radii.  When  rotated  this  gives  the  effect  of  a 
surface  made  up  of  three  concentric  zones  or  rings,  one  in 
which  the  color  is  mixed  with  white,  one  with  gray  and  the 
other  with  black.  The  demonstration  may  be  made  roughly 
quantitative  by  determining  the  proportions  of  color  required 
to  give  the  chromatic  threshold  in  black,  white  and  the  grays; 
also  by  determining  the  proportions  of  color  and  the  achro- 
matic series  to  give  equal  saturations. 

(b)  Prepare  a  preexposure  surface,  half  white  and  half 
black,  50x60  cm.  Expose  the  eye  15-20  seconds  and  pro- 
ject the  after-image  on  a  colored  surface,  e.g.,  blue,  of  the 
same  dimensions.  The  half  of  the  field  preexposed  to  black 
will  appear  a  very  pale  unsaturated  lavendar,  while  the  half 
preexposed  to  white  will  be  a  dark  strongly  saturated  blue, 
although  the  eye  receives  the  same  amount  of  light  from 
both  halves  of  the  field.  As  the  after-image  dies  away  the 
two  halves  of  the  field  become  more  and  more  nearly  alike 
in  saturation  and  color  tone.  If  desired,  the  preexposure 
surface  may  be  made  of  white>  black  and  a  series  of  graded 


384  C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 

grays,  appropriately  arranged.  When  this  is  done  the 
graded  loss  in  saturation  due  to  the  different  brightnesses  of 
the  after-image  may  be  observed.  This  demonstration  also 
may  be  made  quantitative  by  finding  the  threshold  of  color 
after  the  eye  has  been  preexposed  for  15-20  seconds  to  white, 
black  and  the  grays. 

(c)  Prepare  contrast  discs  with  narrow  rings  of  color  and 
inside  and  outside  surfaces  of  black,  white  and  a  gray  of  the 
brightness  of  the  color,  respectively.  Set  up  on  color  mixers 
side  by  side  and  rotate  to  smooth  out  all  margins.  The 
colors  are  lightened  and  darkened  respectively  by  contrast 
induced  by  the  black  and  white  fields.  The  effect  of  these 
achromatic  excitations  on  the  hue  and  saturations  of  the 
colors  is  similar  to  that  obtained  in  the  former  experiments. 
A  more  striking  effect  is  produced  if  a  mixed  color,  <?.g., 
orange,  is  used.  The  quantitative  features  noted  above  can 
also  be  utilized  in  this  demonstration  by  employing  for  the 
contrast  ring  in  each  case  a  gray  of  the  brightness  of  the 
color  and  enough  of  the  color  to  give  the  threshold  of  color 
sensation  when  acted  upon  by  the  white  and  black  inductions. 
The  effect  of  induction  and  after-image,  it  will  be  remem- 
bered, are  not  nearly  so  striking  in  the  central  as  in  the 
peripheral  retina.  Much  more  induction  with  a  given  bright- 
ness difference  between  the  inducing  and  the  contrast  field, 
for  example,  is  produced  in  the  peripheral  retina,  and  only  a 
short  period  of  preexposure  (2-3  seconds)  is  required  to  give 
a  strong  after-image  with  no  latent  period. 

RESULTS 

The  following  results  were  obtained:  (i)  The  widest 
angular  limits  of  the  color  zones  were  obtained  when  the 
preexposure  and  surrounding  field  were  of  the  same  bright- 
ness as  the  color.  (2)  When  the  brightness  of  preexposure 
and  surrounding  field  were  different  from  that  of  the  color, 
the  effect  of  surrounding  field  was  less  than  that  of  preexpo- 
sure; and  the  effect  of  either  is  always  less  than  the  com- 
bined effect  of  both.  (3)  In  some  meridians  the  effect  of 
surrounding  field  alone  narrowed  the  limits  as  much  as 


THE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY  385 

II  degrees;  the  effect  of  preexposure  alone,  as  much  as  17 
degrees;  and  the  combined  effect  of  preexposure  and  sur- 
rounding field,  as  much  as  20  degrees. 

(4)  The  amounts  the  limits  were  narrowed  for  red, 
yellow,  green  and  blue,  respectively,  by  a  white  preexposure 
alone  ranged  in  the  different  meridians1  from  4-15  degrees, 
2-17  degrees,  3-15  degrees,  and  4-12  degrees;  by  a  black 
preexposure  from  3—11  degrees,  3-10  degrees,  4-13  degrees, 
and  2-12  degrees;  by  a  white  surrounding  field  1.5-10  de- 
grees, 2-9  degrees,  2-11  degrees,  and  2-10  degrees;  by  a 
black  surrounding  field  1-8  degrees,  1-8  degrees,  2-10 
degrees,  and  1.5-9  degrees;  by  a  combined  white  preexposure 
and  white  surrounding  field  5-19  degrees,  2-20  degrees, 
4-20  degrees,  and  5-17  degrees;  by  a  combined  black  pre- 
exposure and  black  surrounding  field  4-17  degrees,  5-12 
degrees,  7-18  degrees  and  5-18  degrees.  When  the  effect 
of  a  white  or  black  surrounding  field  alone  was  wanted,  the 
preexposure  was  made  of  the  same  brightness  as  the  color 
at  the  point  of  investigation;  similarly  when  the  effect  of  a 
white  or  black  preexposure  was  wanted,  the  surrounding 
field  was  made  of  the  same  brightness  as  the  color  at  the 
point  of  investigation.  The  value  of  the  limits  with  a  pre- 
exposure and  surrounding  field  of  the  same  brightness  as  the 
color  served  in  each  case  as  the  standard  value  in  terms  of 
which  to  estimate  the  amounts  the  limits  were  narrowed  by 
the  white  and  black  preexposures  and  surrounding  fields  and 
their  combinations. 

These  values,  it  will  be  remembered  were  obtained  with  a 
very  precise  control  of  the  illumination  of  the  working 
surfaces.  It  is  obvious  that  a  much  greater  variability  of 
result  should  be  expected  had  there  been  no  better  control 
of  the  constancy  of  illumination  than  is  ordinarily  exercised 
in  office  and  clinic  work,  and  too  often  in  laboratory  work. 
The  effect  on  both  the  limits  and  hue  of  the  color  of  such 
variations  in  the  daylight  illumination  of  the  working  surfaces 
as  are  apt  to  occur  over  long  periods  of  time  when  no  especial 
control  is  exercised,  will  be  given  in  a  later  paper. 

1  In  the  order  shown  in  the  tables. 


386 


C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 


In  order  to  realize  how  profoundly  the  powers  of  chromatic 
response  must  have  been  affected  to  change  the  limits  of 
sensitivity  by  the  amounts  represented  by  the  above  figures 
one  must  bear  in  mind  how  abruptly  sensitivity  falls  off  in 
the  far  periphery  of  the  retina.  A  determination  of  the 
thresholds  of  color  in  the  temporal  meridian  with  preexposure 

TABLE  I 

LIMITS  OF  COLOR  FIELD  FOR  RED 

Showing  the  Effect  of  Brightness  of  Preexposure,  Brightness  of  Surrounding  Field,  and 

the  Combined  Effect  of  Brightness  of  Preexposure  and  Surrounding 

Field  on  the  Apparent  Limits  for  Red 


Meridian 

Effect  of  Preexposure1 

Effect  ot  Surrounding 
Fields 

Combined  Effect  of 
Preexposure  and  Sur- 
rounding Field 

Gray  of 
Brightness 
of  Color 

White 

Black 

Gray  of 
Brightness 
of  Color 

White 

Black 

Gray  of 
Brightness 
of  Color 

White 

Black 

Upper      o°.  , 

58 

49 
49 
47 
43 
47 
50 
Si 
60 

73 
79 
85 
89 
89 
85 
75 

45 

43 
43 
43 
38 

$ 

47 
53 
59 
64 
75 
83 
82 

78 
62 

47 
43 

41 

42.5 

37 
42 

45 
47 
56 
68 

74 
80 

85 
85 
82 

65 

58 

49 
49 
47 
43 
47 
5° 

£ 

73 
79 
85 
89 
89 
85 
75 

4* 
46 
46 

45-S 
4i-5 
43 
48 
48.5 
55 
66 
70 
80 
85 
84 
81 

65 

5° 

46 

44 
44-5 
40 

43 
47 
48.5 
57 
70 
76 
82 
88 
86 

83 

68 

58 

49 
49 

47 
43 
47 
5° 

& 

73 
79 
85 
89 
89 
85 
75 

40 
41 

38.5 
41 
38 
41 

45 
46 

52 
55 
60 
69 
80 
80 

77 
60 

41 

39 

37-5 
40 
38 
42-5 

^ 
46 

|6 
62 

72 
78 
84 

83 

Si 

64 

Nasal     25°  

45°-  •  • 

70s 

90°.. 

110°.. 

135°-. 

155°  

Lower  180°  

Temporal      25° 

45°o 
70° 

!            9°°o 

110° 

;     I3so° 
155° 

and  surrounding  field  of  the  same  brightness  as  the  color  for 
red,  yellow,  green  and  blue  at  5  degrees,  3  degrees,  2  degrees 
and  i  degree  respectively  from  the  limit  shows  the  following 
values:  for  red,  132,  150,  250  and  320  degrees;  for  yellow, 
100,  150,  240  and  330  degrees;  for  green  130,  145,  260  and 
345  degrees;  and  for  blue  130,  145,  200  and  310  degrees. 

1  In  determining  the  effect  of  the  different  brightnesses  of  preexposure,  the  bright- 
ness of  the  surrounding  field  was  made  equal  to  that  of  the  color  at  the  point  of  in- 
vestigation. 

2  In  determining  the  effect  of  the  different  brightnesses  of  surrounding  field,  the 
brightness  of  the  preexposure  was  made  equal  to  that  of  the  color  at  the  point  of 
investigation. 


THE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY 


387 


For  red  thus  there  was  an  increase  of  172.7  per  cent,  in  the 
threshold  in  passing  to  the  limit  from  a  point  5  degrees  from 
the  limit;  for  yellow  an  increase  of  260  per  cent.;  for  green 
an  increase  of  207.7  per  cent.;  and  for  blue  an  increase  of 
207.7  Per  cent.  For  a  more  detailed  experimental  analysis 
of  the  effect  of  preexposure,  surrounding  field,  intensity  of 

TABLE  II 

LIMITS  OF  COLOR  FIELD  FOR  YELLOW 

Showing  the  Effect  of  Brightness  of  Preexposure,  Brightness  of  Surrounding  Field,  and 

the  Combined  Effect  of  Brightness  of  Preexposure  and  Surrounding 

Field  on  the  Apparent  Limits  for  Yellow. 


Meridian 

Effect  of  Preexposure  > 

Effect  of  Surrounding 
Field' 

Combined  Effect  of 
Preexposure  and  Sur- 
rounding Field 

Gray  of 
Brightness 
of  Color 

White 

Black 

Gray  of 
Brightness 
of  Color 

White 

Black 

Gray  of 
Brightness 
of  Color 

White 

Black 

Upper      o°  

47 
42 

4* 
46 

44 
46 

50 
48 

59 
65 
73 
87 
89 
89 
87 
72 

41 

39 
37 
42 
42 

42 
46 

44 
5» 

48 

63 
70 

75 
81 
80 
60 

37-S 
38 
36 
40 
40 
38 

45 
44 

54 
55 
70 

84 
85 
86 

|4 
65 

47 

42 

42 

46 

44 
46 
5° 
48 
59 
65 
73 
87 
89 
89 
87 
72 

41 
40 
40 

44 

42 

43 

4< 
46 

53 
58 
68 

79 
80 

83 

82 

63 

39 

39 

38 
42 
41 
41 

47.5 

46 

I6 

61 

72 
86 
87 
87 
85.5 
67 

47 
42 

8 

8 

50 
48 

I9 
65 

73 
87 
89 
89 
87- 
72 

38 
38.5 

37 
42 
42 

4* 
46 

43 
47 

11 

69 

72 
80 
78 
59 

36 

37 
35-5 
39 
38.5 
37 
45 
43 
52 

I3 
67 

80 
84 

85 
84 

63 

Nasal     25°  

45°.  • 

70°.. 

90'.. 

lioV. 

135°.  • 

155°  

Lower  180°  

Temporal      25°     . 

<     ' 
7°l     • 
9°I     ' 

110°      . 

'«:  • 

155  • 

the  illumination  of  the  visual  field,  amounts  of  induction 
with  different  brightness  relations  of  surrounding  field  to 
stimulus  at  different  intensities  of  illumination,  etc.,  and  the 
effect  of  all  of  these  on  the  thresholds  of  color  and  the  limits 
of  sensitivity  the  reader  is  referred  to  the  first  two  papers 
cited  in  the  appended  bibliography  (1). 

5.  In  those  meridians  in  which  the  limits  are  wide  there 
is  a  general  tendency  for  the  white  preexposure  and  surround- 
ing field  to  narrow  the  limits  more  than  a  black  preexposure 

1  Brightness  of  Surrounding  Field:  gray  of  the  brightness  of  yellow. 
*  Brightness  of  Preexposure:  gray  of  the  brightness  of  yellow. 


388 


C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 


and  a  black  surrounding  field.  We  have  stated  in  our  intro- 
duction that  the  amount  of  inhibition  of  the  chromatic  by 
the  achromatic  excitation  varies  with  the  color,  the  part  of 
the  retina  stimulated  and  the  state  of  adaptation  of  the 
retina.  This  statement  applies  also  to  the  relative  effects 
of  white  and  black.  In  the  central  retina  at  medium  and 
high  illuminations  white  inhibits  color  much  more  than  black. 

TABLE  III 

LIMITS  OF  COLOR  FIELD  FOR  GREEN 

Showing  the  Effect  of  Brightness  of  Preexposure,  Brightness  of  Surrounding  Field,  and 

the  Combined  Effect  of  Brightness  of  Preexposure  and  Surrounding 

Field  on  the  Apparent  Limits  for  Green 


Meridian 

Effect  of  Preexposure  1 

Effect  of  Surrounding 
Fields 

Combined  Effect  of 
Preexposure  and  Sur- 
rounding Field 

Gray  of 
Brightness 
of  Color 

White 

Black 

Gray  of 

Brightness 
of  Color 

White 

Black 

Gray  of 
Brightness 
of  Color 

White 

Black 

Upper      o°.  . 

36 

35 
38 
39 
39 
37 
37 
33 
37 
37 

f 
61 

69 
65 

57 
44 

26 

30 
30 

34 
35 
3i 
32 
3° 
32 
30 
34 

11 

S3 
42 

39 

29 
27 
28 
31 

33 
31 
29 
29 
31 

32 
36 

53 
60 

56 
44 

37 

36 

35 
38 
39 
39 
37 
37 
33 
37 
37 
42 
61 
69 
65 
57 
44 

28 
31 

3A 
36 

37 
33 
34 
31 
34 
34 

32 
56 

60 

58 
46 

4i 

31 
29 
30 
31 

35 
33 
3i 
30 
33 
35 
40 

57 
62 
61 
47 
39 

36 

35 
38 
39 
39 
37 
37 
33 
37 
37 
42 
61 
69 
65 
57 
44 

27 
26 
29 

32 

33 
3i 
3i 
29 
28 
28 
30 
47 

S2 
46 

37 
35 

22 
21 
24 
27 
28 
30 
25 
26 
26 
26 

33 
SO 
S3 
So 
39 
34 

Nasal    25°  

45°  

70° 

Q0» 

!»•:: 

I3c°.. 

155°  

Lower  180°  

Temporal:    25° 
< 

7°o 

9°° 

110° 

I3s: 
155° 

At  these  illuminations  therefore  a  black  preexposure  and 
surrounding- field  are  much  more  unfavorable  than  white. 
At  lower  illuminations  this  difference  in  effect  becomes  less 
pronounced.  In  the  far  periphery  of  the  retina  the  following 
are  some  of  the  conditions  which  contribute  to  make  black  as 
preexposure  and  surrounding  field  give  wider  limits  of 
sensitivity,  (a)  A  condition  of  low  illumination  and  a  state 
of  low  illumination  adaptation,  (b)  A  darkening  of  all  of  the 

1  Brightness  of  Surrounding  Field:  gray  of  the. brightness  of  green. 

2  Brightness  of  Preexposure:  gray  of  the  brightness  of  green. 


THE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY 


389 


colors,  particularly  red  and  yellow  (the  Purkinje  shift  of  the 
peripheral  retina).  This  brings  the  brightness  of  the  color 
nearer  to  black  than  to  white  and  the  stronger  relative 
darkening  of  red  and  yellow  than  of  their  neutral  or  colorless 
preexposures  and  surrounding  fields,  increases  the  contrast 

TABLE  IV 

LIMITS  OF  COLOR  FIELD  FOR  BLUE 

Showing  the  Effect  of  Brightness  of  Preexposure,  Brightness  of  Surrounding  Field,  and 

the  Combined  Effect  of  Brightness  of  Preexposure  and  Surrounding 

Field  on  the  Apparent  Limits  for  Blue 


Meridian 

Effect  of  Preexposure  * 

Effect  of  Surrounding 
Field* 

Combined  Effect  of 
Preexposure  and  Sur- 
rounding Field 

Gray  of 
Brightness 
of  Color 

White 

Black 

Gray  of 
Brightness 
of  Color 

White 

Black 

Gray  of 
Brightness 
of  Color 

White 

Black 

Upper     o°  

52 

45 

4* 
46 

52 
5° 

II 

70 
70 

79 
86 

9i 
91 
89 
80 

40 
39 
44 
41 
42 

46 

47-5 
48 
63.5 
62 

7i 
78 
86 

85 
84 
75 

46 

32 
46 

41 
42 

45 
47-5 
46 
62 
65 
73 
82 

85 

I* 
83 

75 

52 
45 
48 

46 

52 

5° 
52 
58 
70 
70 

79 
86 

9i 
9i 
89 
80 

42 
41 

45 
44 
48 

47-5 
50 

& 

65 
73 
80 

89 
88 
86 
77 

48 

42 
46 

44 
47 
47 
49 

$ 
64-5 
68.5 

75 
84 
89 
88 
85 
77 

52 

45 

4* 
46 

52 
SO 
52 
58 
70 
70 

79 
86 

9i 
9i 

89 
80 

35 

38 

40 
41 
42 

It 

43 
61 

I6 
65 

77 
84 
83 
83 
75 

its 

40 

41 
40 

43 

46 
42 

59 

I? 
69 
80 
84 
83 
83 
74 

Nasal     25°  

4<;°.  . 

70° 

S> 

110°    . 

I-.C0 

'"a 
155°  

Lower  180°   

Temporal:    25°  . 
45°0  ' 

7°    ' 
90°  . 

110°    . 

'«:  • 

iss  . 

and  after-image  effect  for  white  and  decreases  it  for  black. 
The  darkening  of  red  and  yellow  in  passing  to  the  far  periphery 
of  the  retina  is  very  great.  In  the  nasal  half  of  the  retina 
with  its  wide  limits,  the  effect  of  this  darkening  on  the  results 
of  our  determinations  was,  of  course,  the  most  pronounced. 
As  colors  darken,  there  is,  when  a  certain  point  in  the  process 
is  reached,  varying  with  the  color,  a  tendency  for  them  to 
lose  their  saturation  very  rapidly,  (c]  Achromatic  induction 
increases  very  strongly  with  decrease  of  illumination  and 
therefore  increases  in  passing  from  the  center  to  the  periphery 

1  Brightness  of  Surrounding  Field:  gray  of  the  brightness  of  blue. 
1  Brightness  of  Preexposure:  gray  of  the  brightness  of  blue. 


390 


C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 


of  the  retina.     It  increases  much  faster  for  white  than  for 
black. 

In  the  meridians  in  which  the  limits  are  narrower  the 
situation  is  more  nearly  as  it  is  in  the  central  retina.  Here 
the  tendency  is  for  the  limits  to  be  narrowed  more  by  a  black 


45 


70 


flO 


(35 


155 


180 


FIG.  I.  Effect  of  brightness  of  preexposure  on  the  limits  of  the  color  field.  In 
this  chart  are  shown  the  apparent  limits  for  red  with  preexposures  respectively  of  white, 
black,  and  gray  of  the  brightness  of  the  color  at  the  point  of  investigation,  surrounding 
field  in  each  case  gray  of  the  brightness  of  the  color  at  the  point  of  investigation. 

than  by  a  white  preexposure  and  surrounding  field.  In 
some  meridians  the  amount  of  narrowing  is  approximately 
equal  for  both.  Another  factor  which  tends  to  make  the 
effect  more  nearly  the  same  in  these  meridians  for  all  back- 
grounds and  preexposures  is  the  more  abrupt  falling  off  in 
sensitivity.  That  is,  more  effect  on  sensitivity  is  required 
here  to  change  the  limits  by  a  detectable  amount  than  is 


THE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY 


39* 


required  in  those  portions  of  the  retina  where  the  sensitivity 
grades  off  more  slowly. 

A  detailed  representation  of  the  results  is  given  in  Tables 
I-IV.  and  a  graphic  representation  of  a  part  of  the  results 
in  Figures  1-6.  In  the  tables  results  are  given  separately 


45 


45 


7C 


•  55 


ISO 


FIG.  2.  Effect  of  brightness  of  surrounding  field  on  the  limits  of  the  color  field. 
In  this  chart  are  shown  the  apparent  limits  for  red  with  a  surrounding  field  respectively 
of  white,  black,  and  gray  of  the  brightness  of  the  color  at  the  point  of  investigation,  pre- 
exposure in  each  case  gray  of  the  brightness  of  the  color  at  the  point  of  investigation. 

for  the  effect  of  preexposure,  surrounding  field  and  com- 
bined effect  of  preexposure  and  surrounding  field  for  each 
of  the  four  colors:  red,  yellow,  green  and  blue.  In  case  of 
the  figures,  however,  space  has  been  taken  to  represent 
separately  the  effect  of  preexposure  and  surrounding  field 
for  only  one  of  the  colors,  red — Figs.  1-3.  Figs.  3-6  show 


392 


C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 


the  combined  effect  of  preexposure  and  surrounding  field  on 
each  of  the  four  colors.  In  our  previous  papers  the  repre- 
sentation of  results  has  been  in  terms  of  position  on  the  retina. 
In  this  paper  the  representation  has  been  made  in  terms  of 
field  of  vision. 


25 


Z5 


45 


70 


(35 


155 


ISO 


FIG.  3.  The  combined  effect  of  brightness  of  preexposure  and  surrounding  field 
on  the  limits  of  the  color  field.  In  this  chart  are  shown  the  apparent  limits  for  red 
with  both  preexposure  and  surrounding  field  respectively  of  white,  black,  and  gray  of 
the  brightness  of  the  color  at  the  point  of  investigation. 

CONCLUSION 

It  is  quite  obvious  from  the  preceding  data  that  repro- 
ducible results  can  not  be  hoped  for  in  perimetric  or  campi- 
metric  determinations  of  the  sensitivity  of  the  peripheral 
retina  unless  the  variable  effects  of  preexposure  and  surround- 
ing field  be  eliminated  from  the  conditions  of  work.  This 
can  be  done  completely  only  by  making  the  brightness  of 


THE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY 


393 


the  preexposure  and  surrounding  field  in  each  case  the  same 
as  that  of  the  color  employed  and  working  under  constant 
intensity  of  illumination.  Among  the  effects  of  a  variable 
intensity  of  illumination  on  the  results  of  a  perimetric  or 
campimetric  determination  the  following  two  may  be  men- 


25 


Z5 


45 


no 


135 


155 


155 


FIG.  4.  The  combined  effect  of  brightness  of  preexposure  and  surrounding  field 
on  the  limits  of  the  color  field.  In  this  chart  are  shown  the  apparent  limits  for  yellow 
with  both  preexposure  and  surrounding  field  respectively  of  white,  black,  and  the  gray 
of  the  brightness  of  the  color  at  the  point  of  investigation. 

tioned.  (a)  When  the  color  stimulation  is  given  by  light 
reflected  from  pigment  stimuli  of  a  given  coefficient  of  reflec- 
tion the  amount  of  colored  light  obtained  depends  upon  the 
intensity  of  light  incident  on  the  reflecting  surface.  And  (b) 
a  brightness  match  of  preexposure  and  surrounding  field  with 
the  stimulus  surface  will  not  hold  at  different  illuminations 
(the  Purkinje  phenomenon). 


394 


C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 


We  have  worked  out  in  previous  papers  the  conditions 
under  which  the  desired  standardization  of  intensity  and 
color  value  of  illumination  and  control  of  brightness  of  pre- 
exposure  and  surrounding  field  may  be  obtained  in  labor- 


45 


45 


00 


(35 


155 


ISO 


FIG.  5.  The  combined  effect  of  brightness  of  preexposure  and  surrounding  field 
on  the  limits  of  the  color  field.  In  this  chart  are  shown  the  apparent  limits  for  green 
with  both  preexposure  and  surrounding  field  respectively  of  white,  black,  and  gray  of  the 
brightness  of  the  color  at  the  point  of  investigation. 

atory  campimetry  (4).  These  conditions  however  are  scarcely 
feasible  for  the  work  of  the  office  or  clinic.  We  have  there- 
fore more  recently  devised  and  constructed  a  perimeter  by 
means  of  which  equal  illumination  of  the  stimulus  is  received 
at  every  point  on  the  perimeter  arm  in  all  meridians  and  the 
effect  of  brightness  of  preexposure  and  surrounding  field  can 
be  eliminated  with  an  ease  and  speed  of  manipulation  which 


THE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY 


395 


should  be  feasible  for  office  and  clinic  work  and  with  a  com- 
pleteness of  result  that  should  be  adequate  for  this  type  of 
work.  We  have  in  fact  constructed  two  types  of  perimeter 
either  one  of  which  provides  for  the  uniform  illumination  of 
the  arm  of  the  perimeter.  The  perimeters  will  be  described 
in  a  later  paper. 

tj 

ts 


70 


155 


155 


(SO 


FIG.  6.  The  combined  effect  of  brightness  of  preexposure  and  surrounding  field 
on  the  limits  of  the  color  field.  In  this  chart  are  shown  the  apparent  limits  for  blue 
with  both  preexposure  and  surrounding  field  respectively  of  white,  black,  and  gray  of  the 
brightness  of  the  color  at  the  point  of  investigation. 

COMMENT 

A  much  more  detailed  study  of  the  quantitative  relations 
of  the  chromatic  and  achromatic  components  of  the  visual 
sensation  for  different  intensities  of  stimulus  and  for  different 
states  of  the  reacting  eye  is  needed.  There  are  many  im- 
portant practical  bearings  of  the  knowledge  that  would  be 


396  C.  E,  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 

gained  by  such  a  study.  For  example,  it  is  often  deemed 
sufficient  to  give  a  colorimetric  specification  of  a  light  at  one 
intensity  alone  in  spite  of  the  fact  that  the  saturation,  even 
the  hue  of  the  color,  changes  with  the  intensity  as  well  as 
the  composition  of  the  light.  We  are  all  familiar  in  a  general 
way  with  the  fact  that  even  the  sensation  aroused  by  a 
spectrum  band  of  light  begins  as  achromatic  or  colorless  at 
very  low  intensities,  passes  through  saturation  and  hue 
changes  with  increase  of  intensity  of  light  and  finally  becomes 
colorless  again  at  high  intensities.  We  have  pointed  out 
many  times  in  connection  with  problems  of  lighting  (5) 
that  while  a  specification  of  the  composition  of  light  is  in- 
dependent of  intensity,  a  true  colorimetric  specification 
may  not,  depending  on  the  method  used,  be  definite  un- 
less it  is  accompanied  also  with  a  specification  of  intensity. 
Filters  designed  to  give  a  certain  coloration  of  light  can  not 
be  depended  upon  to  give  this  subjective  coloration  at  all 
intensities  even  though  the  wave-lengths  transmitted  are 
in  the  same  proportions.  Indeed  when  used  in  connection 
with  the  same  intensity  of  source  the  coloration  of  the  il- 
lumination of  an  object  as  seen  by  the  eye,  particularly 
the  saturation,  will  vary  at  different  distances  from  the 
source.  The  lack  of  realization  of  this  dependence  of  the 
color  of  light  on  its  intensity  as  well  as  its  composition  has 
doubtless  played  no  small  part  in  the  popular  confusion 
which  exists  as  to  the  comparative  color  values  of  different 
artificial  lights  and  of  the  closeness  of  approximation  of 
certain  artificial  lights  to  daylight.  The  surface  of  a  Wels- 
bach  mantle,  0.7  per  cent,  ceria,  viewed  directly  is,  for 
example,  whitish;  but  the  reading  page  illuminated  by  it  to 
ordinary  working  brightness  appears  distinctly  yellowish 
green.  Again  the  illumination  given  by  the  blue  bulb  lamp 
may  be  judged  of  different  color  values  depending  upon  the 
intensity  of  light  falling  on  the  illuminated  object.  Comple- 
mentary colors  combined  to  gray  at  medium  or  high  intensi- 
ties may  not  be  seen  as  colorless  at  low  illuminations,  <?.g., 
the  gray  produced  by  combining  the  Hering  standard  blue 
and  yellow  under  daylight  of  good  intensity  becomes  dis- 


THE  LIMITS  OF  COLOR  SENSITIVITY  397 

tinctly  lavendarish  under  the  same  light  at  low  intensities. 
Daylight  itself  is  popularly  said  to  become  bluish  at  low 
intensities.  Examples  may  thus  be  multiplied  indefinitely 
of  the  apparently  peculiar  complexity  of  the  selectiveness  of 
the  eye's  chromatic  response  to  intensity. 

In  addition  to  the  practical  bearings  of  the  shifting  of  the 
quantitative  relations  of  the  achromatic  and  chromatic 
components  in  the  visual  sensation,  with  no  change  in  the 
composition  of  light,  there  is  the  interesting  problem  of 
explanation.  Many  factors,  it  may  be,  are  operative  in  the 
production  of  this  phenomenon:  a  selectiveness  of  response 
to  intensity,  perhaps  even  a  change  in  the  range  of  the  eye's 
chromatic  response  to  wave-length  with  change  of  intensity? 
in  case  of  spectrum  lights;  this  and  slight  variations  for 
change  of  intensity,  in  the  cancelling  proportions  of  the  com- 
plementary colors  and  in  the  mutually  inhibitive  actions  of 
the  non-complementary  colors,  in  case  of  mixed  lights;  a 
direct  action  of  the  achromatic  excitation  on  the  chromatic, 
for  both  simple  and  mixed  lights;  etc.  It  seems  not  only 
reasonable  but  necessary  to  infer  this  latter  action  because 
the  same  type  of  effect  is  produced  on  the  color  when  the 
achromatic  component  of  the  sensation  is  varied  in  all  of  the 
following  ways:  by  keeping  the  composition  of  the  light  the 
same  and  varying  its  intensity,  by  adding  colorless  light,  by 
adding  white  or  black  to  the  sensation  as  after-image  or  con- 
trast, and  by  the  achromatic  changes  in  adaptation.  No 
other  explanation  seems  possible  when  the  phenomenon  is 
produced  as  an  effect  of  preexposure  and  surrounding  field  or 
as  we  commonly  say  by  after-image  and  contrast,  as  has  been 
the  case  in  the  work  reported  in  this  paper. 

BIBLIOGRAPHY 

I.  RAND,  GERTRUDE.  The  Effect  of  Changes  in  the  General  Illumination  of  the 
Retina  upon  its  Sensitivity  to  Color,  PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1912,  19,  462-491; 
The  Factors  that  Influence  the  Sensitivity  of  the  Retina  to  Color:  A  Quanti- 
tative Study  and  Methods  of  Standardizing,  PSYCHOL.  MONOG.,  1913,  15,  No. 
62,  i66+xl;  FERREE,  C.  E.  AND  RAND,  G.,  The  Absolute  Limits  of  Color 
Sensitivity  and  the  Effect  of  Intensity  of  Light  on  the  Apparent  Limits,  PSY- 
CHOL. REV.,  1920,  27,  1-24. 


398  C.  E.  FERREE  AND  GERTRUDE  RAND 

z.  FERREE,  C.  E.  AND  RAND,  G.,  An  Optics  Room  and  a  Method  of  Standardizing  its 
Illumination,  PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1912,  19,  364-373;  A  Simple  Daylight  Photom- 
eter, Amer.  J.  of  Psychol.,  1916,  27,  335-340;  Chromatic  Thresholds  of 
Sensation  from  Center  to  Periphery  of  the  Retina  and  their  Bearing  on  Color 
Theory,  Part  I,  PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1919,  26,  16-42.  FERREE,  C.  E.,  RAND,  G. 
AND  HAUPT,  I.  A.,  A  Method  of  Standardizing  the  Color  Value  of  the  Day- 
light Illumination  of  an  Optics  Room,  Amer.  J.  of  Psychol.,  1920,  31,  77-87. 

3.  FERREE,  C.  E.,  Description  of  a   Rotary  Campimeter,   Amer.   J.   of  Psychol., 

.1912,  21,  449-453.  FERREE,  C.  E.  AND  RAND,  G.,  A  SpectroscopSc  Appar- 
atus for  the  Investigation  of  the  Color  Sensitivity  of  the  Retina,  Central  and 
Peripheral,  /.  of  Exper.  Psychol.,  1916,  i,  246-283. 

4.  Op.  cit.:  also  FERREE,  C.  E.  AND  RAND,  G.,  A  Substitute  for  an  Artificial  Pupil, 

PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1916,  23,  380-383. 

5.  FERREE,  C.  E.  AND  RAND,  G.,  Some  Experiments  on  the  Eye  with  Different  Illum- 

inants — Part  I,  Trans.  Illuminat.  Eng.  Soc.,  1918,  13,  1-18;  Part  II,  ibid., 
1919,  14,  107-133;  etc. 


VOL.  27,  No.  6  November,  1920 


THE  PSYCHOLOGICAL  REVIEW 


DO  WE  THINK  IN  WORDS? 

BEHAVIORIST  vs.  INTROSPECTIVE  CONCEPTIONS 

BY  ARTHUR  S.  OTIS 

Stanford  University 

I.  Purpose  of  the  Discussion. — The  following  discussion 
takes  its  departure  from  the  reading  of  Dr.  John  B.  Watson's 
'Psychology  from  the  Standpoint  of  a  Behaviorist.' 

It  is  the  purpose  of  the  writer  to  discuss  certain  hypotheses 
which  are  put  forth  with  seeming  conviction  in  the  text  but 
which  are  believed  by  the  writer  to  be  false. 

To  discuss  the  whole  subject  of  the  Behaviorist  point  of 
view,  in  relation  to  the  more  generally  accepted  points  of 
view  in  psychology  would  be  quite  impossible  in  the  scope  of 
this  article.  That  a  text  in  psychology  should  be  written 
in  which  the  author  not  only  purposefully  avoids  the  mention 
of  such  concepts  as  perception,  ideation,  association  of  ideas, 
consciousness,  attention,  will,  etc.,  but  even  goes  so  far  as 
to  claim  that  these  concepts  are  useless  for  purposes  of 
psychology,  is  of  course  quite  a  source  of  wonder.  The 
indispensability  of  the  concepts  avoided  by  Behaviorist 
psychology  and  of  the  use  of  introspection  will  be  apparent, 
we  believe,  from  the  discussion  of  but  one  'assumption' 
which  it  makes.  We  shall  confine  this  article  to  the  discussion 
of  this  assumption. 

The  hypothesis  referred  to  is  'the  point  of  view  that  has 
been  advocated  throughout  the  text,  namely,  that  thought 
is  the  action  of  language  mechanisms'  (p.  316).  The  mean- 
ing of  the  expression,  language  mechanisms,  is  carefully 
defined  by  the  author  as  referring  to  any  of  those  muscles 

399 


400  ARTHUR  S.  OTIS 

of  the  body  which  actuate  to  produce  words  whether  spoken, 
written,  or  gesticulated  (as  by  deaf  mutes).  The  meaning 
of  the  word,  thought,  as  used  in  this  hypothesis  is  not  ex- 
plicitly stated,  but  may  be  inferred  with  confidence  from 
various  passages  which  we  shall  quote1  and  is  here  taken  to 
be  the  same  as  the  meaning  of  thought  when  used  by  those 
who  are  not  Behaviorists. 

To  be  sure,  the  author  states  in  the  preface  that  "the 
terms  thinking  and  memory  have  been  carefully  redefined 
in  conformity  with  Behaviorist  psychology."  On  page  14 
we  find  in  italics  the  expression:  '"thinking,"  by  which  we 
mean  subvocal  talking.'  This  may  constitute  the  re-defini- 
tion, but  if  so  it  obviously  begs  the  question  which  we  are 
discussing;  namely  whether  'thinking'  as  ordinarily  under- 
stood does  consist  of  subvocal  talking.  We  shall  therefore 
leave  this  re-definition  out  of  account. 

It  will  be  realized  that  the  adjustment  of  an  individual 
to  his  environment  may  involve  acts  requiring  mental 
activity  of  all  degrees  of  consciousness,  from  the  most  auto- 
matic habitual  or  instinctive  acts  requiring  little  or  no 
consciousness,  such  as  moving  the  eyes  toward  an  object  it 
is  desired  to  see,  to  the  solving  of  problems  requiring  the 

1  "A  man  may  sit  motionless  at  his  desk  with  pen  in  hand  and  paper  before  him. 
In  popular  parlance  we  may  say  he  is  idle  or  'thinking,'  but  our  assumption  is  that  his 
muscles  are  really  as  active  and  possibly  more  active  than  if  he  were  playing  tennis. 
But  what  muscles?  Those  muscles  which  have  been  trained  to  act  when  he  is  in 
such  a  situation,  his  laryngeal,  tongue,  and  speech  muscles  generally"  (p.  15). 

"We  manipulate  vocally"  (when  trying  to  think  of  the  name  of  a  familiar  person) 
"by  running  over  the  names  beginning  with  each  succeeding  letter  of  the  alphabet, 
or  by  saying  'black  hair,'  'blue  eyes,'  'six  feet  tall,'  and  the  like"  (p.  305). 

"The  explicit  and  implicit  language  habits  are  formed  along  with  the  explicit 
bodily  habits  and  are  bound  up  with  them  and  become  a  part  of  every  total  unitary 
action  system  that  the  human  organism  forms.  .  .  .  They  are  present  in  the  simplest 
types  of  adjustment  that  he  makes.  We  can  see  the  functioning  of  language  habits 
only  slightly  in  certain  activities,  as,  for  example,  in  swimming,  tapping  on  the  table 
with  a  pencil,  while  in  certain  other  types  they  form  an  integral  part  ..."  (p.  309). 

"Our  view  is  that  overt  language  develops  under  social  training.  It  is  thus 
absorbed  into  and  becomes  a  part  of  every  total  integration  of  the  individual.  Hence 
when  he  is  making  adjustments  in  the  absence  of  other  like  beings  language  remains 
as  part  of  the  process"  (p.  323). 

"...  the  maiden  thinks  of  her  lover  in  words the  beautiful  thoughts 

of  the  idealist  for  mankind  as  a  whole  or  of  the  mother  for  her  child  ...  are  couched 
in  words  or  their  equivalent"  (p.  325). 


DO  WE   THINK  IN  WORDS?  40 1 

most  concentrated  mental  effort.  It  is  hardly  conceivable 
that  the  Behaviorist  would  claim  that  all  such  adjustment 
involves  language  mechanisms,  as  the  passages  quoted  would 
imply  if  taken  literally.  To  simplify  matters,  however,  we 
will  limit  our  discussion  to  that  type  of  adjustment  ordinarily 
referred  to  as  'thinking,'  namely,  those  mental  processes  of 
the  problem-solving  sort  which  require  some  degree  of  con- 
scious mental  effort,  since  these  are  open  to  introspective 
investigation.  That  even  these  processes  of  adjustment  do 
not  necessarily  require  language  we  shall  attempt  to  show  by 
appeal  to  logic  and  common  experience,  omitting  arguments 
ad  hominem. 

2.  Examples  of  Thinking. — Let  us  consider  one  or  two 
simple  cases  of  problem  solving  and  subject  them  to  critical 
psychological  analysis  in  order  to  determine  whether  they 
involve  language. 

Suppose  I  have  unfolded  a  new  map  and  am  attempting 
to  fold  it  again  as  it  was.  I  have  no  complete  habit,  not 
having  folded  a  map  exactly  like  this  before.  Let  us  see 
what  happens.  Surely  there  is  a  better  way  than  to  let 
someone  watch  me  and  report  his  inferences.  He  would 
merely  see  me  look  at  the  map  and,  let  us  say,  try  to  fold  it 
in  one  way  but  fail  and  then  try  another  way  and  succeed. 
He  might  infer  that  my  method  was  the  so-called  'trial  and 
error'  or  'perseverance'  method.  Or  if  my  lips  have  moved 
he  might  infer  that  I  arrived  at  the  solution  of  the  problem 
by  means  of  the  action  of  the  muscles  of  my  lips  and  other 
speech  organs.  This  appears  to  be  the  method  of  the 
Behaviorist. 

Let  me  introspect  and  report  from  direct  observation 
what  happened  from  the  point  of  view  of  one  looking  on 
from  the  inside.  The  writer  does  not  wish  to  be  misunder- 
stood as  assuming  that  introspection  is  infallible.  One's 
testimony  is  not  infallible  even  when  he  observes  with  his 
own  eyes  an  incident  which  transpires  directly  before  him. 
Relatively  speaking  however,  introspection  is  far  more 
direct  and  reliable  than  inference  based  upon  observation 
from  the  outside. 


402  ARTHUR  S.  OTIS 

On  introspection  I  report  as  follows  regarding  my  action 
with  the  map.  More  or  less  mechanically,  as  we  say,  that 
is,  while  thinking  about  what  I  had  seen  on  the  map,  I 
began  to  fold  the  map  along  one  of  the  creases.  After  a 
moment  I  became  aware  that  the  map  was  not  falling  into 
its  accustomed  folds.  I  then  became  aware  of  the  need  of 
finding  the  correct  way  to  fold  the  map  and  I  unfolded  it  in 
order  to  begin  again.  I  recalled  from  previous  experience 
that  the  crease  on  which  the  first  fold  must  be  made  is  one 
which  runs  entirely  across  the  paper.  I  therefore  looked 
for  such  a  fold  and  on  finding  it  folded  the  paper  on  it  and 
repeated  the  process  until  the  map  was  entirely  folded  up, 
making  no  further  error. 

Now  this  adjustment  which  I  have  made  to  the  problem 
of  folding  the  map  was  ( thinking,'  alike  in  the  popular 
usage  and  that  of  the  psychologist.  The  Behaviorist  claims 
that  thinking  is  the  action  of  language  mechanisms.  Let  us 
go  over  this  example  of  thinking  again  and  examine  it  very 
minutely  to  see  whether  there  is  any  necessary  connection 
between  language  and  the  solving  of  the  problem. 

First  of  all,  how  do  I  become  aware  that  the  map  is  not 
falling  into  its  accustomed  folds?  If  I  go  slightly  back  of 
this  awareness  I  note  a  feeling  of  contradiction  between  a 
subconsciously  expected  feeling  of  flatness  and  the  experienced 
feeling  of  bulginess.  This  contradiction,  we  may  say,  caused 
me  to  become  aware  of  the  improper  folding  of  the  map — 
caused  the  shift  of  my  attention  from  the  thoughts  of  what  I 
had  seen  on  the  map  to  the  matter  of  folding  the  map.1 
How  did  I  then  become  aware  of  the  need  of  finding  the 
correct  way  of  folding  the  map?  The  experience  suggests 
no  other  explanation  than  merely  to  say  that  the  idea  of 
contradiction  'called  up'  or  'suggested'  the  idea  of  need. 
This  idea  in  turn  called  up  the  idea  of  beginning  again. 
We  may  explain  this  process  by  saying  that  it  was  probably 

1  That  a  subconscious  awareness  of  contradiction  may  give  rise  to  an  idea  of 
need,  together  with  an  affective  state  which  effects  a  shift  of  attention  (clear  aware- 
ness) to  the  need,  is  a  matter  of  so  frequent  observation  in  structural  psychology  as  to 
be  considered  a  scientific  fact.  Such  a  fact,  however,  is  of  course  quite  unthought  of 
in  Behaviorist  psychology,  being  wholly  outside  of  its  scope. 


DO  WE   THINK  IN  WORDS?  403 

the  result  of  a  previously  formed  habit.  One  has  learned 
in  such  cases  that  it  is  best  to  begin  again.  When  the  idea 
of  unfolding  the  map  again  has  come  to  occupy  more  or  less 
of  the  whole  of  consciousness,  'the  thought  takes  form  in 
action.'  Behaviorist  psychology  concedes  such  a  phenom- 
enon, so  we  need  not  attempt  to  explain  it.  Having  unfolded 
the  map  I  recalled  previous  experiences  regarding  the  folding 
of  large  sheets  of  paper.  We  will  say  that  the  perception 
of  the  paper  before  me  and  the  idea  of  need  of  folding,  to- 
gether served  to  bring  forth  from  my  memory  store  those 
ideas  which  came  to  my  mind.  These  together  with  the 
perceptions  of  the  map  during  the  process  of  folding  served 
to  educe  that  train  of  ideas  which  guides  the  folding  to  a 
successful  termination. 

Now  what  is  the  material  of  all  this  mental  activity? 
What  do  these  ideas  consist  of?  They  consist  of  images, 
visual,  tactual,  kinaesthetic,  etc.,  of  maps,  and  of  certain 
aspects  of  these  images  such  as  creases,  folding  movements, 
flatness,  bulginess,  etc.  They  have  nothing  to  do  with 
language,  necessarily.  The  idea  of  flatness  is  tactual  or 
visual  or  both,  the  idea  of  a  folding  movement  may  be  visual 
or  kinsesthetic  or  both.  The  idea  of  the  length  or  direction 
of  a  crease  is  visual  or  kinsesthetic  or  both.  Possibly  other 
types  of  imagery  enter  to  a  slight  extent.  But  no  language 
need  be  involved. 

Let  us  now  consider  another  type  of  thinking.  Let  the 
reader  ask  himself  why  it  is  more  difficult  to  play  a  game  of 
chess  blindfolded  than  with  the  chess  board  visible  before 
him.  Obviously  the  answer  is  that  the  perception  of  the 
relative  positions  of  the  chess  men  is  a  great  aid  to  the  mental 
manipulation  which  constitutes  the  basis  of  the  study  of 
moves.  Moreover,  anyone  who  has  played  chess  or  checkers 
will  immediately  appreciate  the  aid  that  would  be  derived 
from  actually  making  the  trial  moves  that  are  contemplated, 
in  more  clearly  appreciating  the  relations  that  such  moves 
would  introduce.  If  the  thinking  were  done  by  means  of 
subvocal  language  it  would  seem  that  seeing  or  not  seeing 
the  chess  board  would  make  no  difference.  The  obvious 


404  ARTHUR  S.  OTIS 

answer  is  that  the  thinking  is  done  by  means  of  the  per- 
ceptions of  the  board  and  men  as  they  are,  the  mental  imaging 
of  the  movement  of  the  men  into  new  positions  and  the 
appreciation  of  the  spacial  and  temporal  relations  between 
the  pieces  and  their  possible  moves  as  introduced  after  the 
mental  manipulation.  No  language  whatever  is  required. 
As  we  shall  show,  a  person  may  indeed  talk  to  himself  while 
contemplating  moves,  but  this  activity  is  entirely  secondary 
and  supplementary. 

3.  The  Material  of  Thought. — Thinking,  as  an  adjustment 
of  the  individual  to  his  environment,  as  the  solving  of  prob- 
lems, consists  of  the  evolving  of  new  ideas,  concepts,  or 
meanings,  from  old.  This  is  accomplished  by  recombination 
of  the  elements  of  the  old  into  new  patterns.  By  ideas, 
concepts,  and  meanings  are  meant  image  patterns,  whether 
they  be  of  words,  objects  seen,  sounds  heard,  things  felt, 
tasted,  sensed  in  any  manner  whatsoever,  or  any  quality, 
attribute,  or  aspect  of  such  image  patterns  as  may  be  con- 
ceived separately  by  abstraction,  such  as  shape,  color,  surface, 
volume,  extent,  duration,  intensity,  symmetry,  movement, 
similarity,  difference,  causality,  symbolism,  abstractness  or 
affective  quality;  or  of  whatever  degree  of  clearness  or 
attenuation  or  incipiency  the  images  or  image  aspects  may  be. 
We  may  think,  therefore;  that  is,  we  may  evolve  new  ideas, 
concepts,  meanings,  in  terms  of  image  patterns  of  any  kind 
whatsoever,  or  of  the  consciousness  (idea)  of  any  relationship 
whatsoever  between  these  image  patterns. 

For  example,  I  am  thinking  when  I  am  effortfully  engaged 
in  composing  a  piece  of  music.  I  sit  at  the  piano  with  music 
paper  at  my  side.  My  mind  is  occupied  with  perceptions 
and  images  of- tones,  tone  combinations,  tone  sequences,  tone 
relationships,  tone  emotional  effects,  tone  symbols  (dots  on 
paper)  the  making  of  these  symbols,  etc. 

My  effort  consists  in  the  maintenance  of  my  attention  to 
the  work,  the  calling  up  of  sequences  of  tone  images,1  the 

1  Strictly  speaking  I  adopt  the  mind  set  that  will  result  in  the  calling  up  of  tone 
images,  or  that  is  calculated  to  do  so.  (Sometimes  I  may  succeed  better  than  at 
other  times.)  We  cannot  call  up  an  image  necessarily  at  will.  Generally  it  is  a  case 
of  taking  a  certain  mental  attitude  ordinarily  called  'trying  to  think'  which  usually 
results  in  the  recall  of  the  idea  desired. 


DO  WE  THINK  IN  WORDS?  4<>5 

comparison  of  these,  the  appraisal  of  their  respective  aesthetic 
values,  the  choice  of  one  or  another,  the  calling  up  of  the 
proper  symbols  of  notation  in  which  to  write  down  the 
musical  ideas,  and  the  writing  of  these.  No  language  is 
involved  in  any  of  this  thinking  (except  perhaps  a  final 
translation  of  the  results  of  thought  into  symbols).  In  this 
case  also  I  may  compose  without  the  piano;  but  this  is  more 
difficult,  since  I  am  compelled  to  make  my  judgments  upon 
images  only,  whereas  with  the  piano  I  may  employ  the  per- 
ceptions of  the  tones  themselves  in  my  judgments.  If  my 
musical  thinking  were  all  done  by  means  of  the  action  of 
speech  muscles  we  do  not  see  that  it  would  make  any  differ- 
ence whether  the  piano  were  struck  or  not. 

Similarly,  one  is  thinking  when  he  is  creating  a  new  archi- 
tectural design,  or  a  drawing  or  painting  or  statue  or  stage 
setting,  or  conceiving  of  a  new  dance  movement  or  inventing 
a  new  mechanical  contrivance  or  playing  tennis  or  searching 
for  the  cause  of  engine  trouble.  The  material  of  one's 
thoughts  in  all  these  cases  is  in  the  form  of  images,  which 
need  be  only  visual,  auditory,  tactual,  kinaesthetic,  may  be, 
in  fact,  of  any  kind  whatever  according  to  the  requirements 
or  to  one's  ability  to  call  forth  such  images.  As  we  have 
said,  one  may  do  any  amount  of  talking  to  oneself  while 
thinking — which  is  merely  putting  one's  thoughts  in  words 
after  they  are  thought — but  the  talking  is  not  the  thinking. 
It  is  supplementary  to  it  in  exactly  the  same  way  that 
describing  a  landscape  is  supplementary  to  seeing  it. 

Thinking  may  be  called  the  controlled  association  of  ideas, 
in  contradistinction  to  the  free  association  of  ideas.  In  the 
free  association  of  ideas,  by  which  we  refer  to  what  is  ordi- 
narily called  day  dreaming  or  revery,  ideas  follow  one  another 
in  a  more  or  less  unguided  manner,  yet  in  a  fairly  rational 
way  as  compared  with  the  incongruous  manner  of  idea  se- 
quence sometimes  experienced  in  dreams.  Doubtless  there 
is  some  sort  of  control  even  in  'free  association'  though  it 
may  be  the  general  interest  in  the  subject  of  thought  or  the 
control  occasioned  by  thought  habits.  However,  in  what  we 
have  called  controlled  association  of  ideas  characterizing 


406  ARTHUR  S.  OTIS 

thinking,  the  ideas  are  guided  in  their  sequence  by  some 
conscious  aim,  e.g.,  a  problem  to  be  solved.  Irrelevant  ideas 
are  discarded  (attended  from),  relevant  ideas  are  attended  to. 
That  which  does  the  controlling  is  often  also  in  the  form  of  a 
definite  idea.  This  is  best  illustrated  when  one  is  given 
two  digits  written  one  above  the  other:  if  told  to  add  them, 
under  the  influence  of  this  guiding  idea  they  call  forth  their 
sum;  if  told  to  subtract  one  from  the  other,  under  the  control 
of  this  guiding  idea  they  suggest  their  difference.  The  same 
stimuli  give  rise  to  either  one  or  another  idea  according  to 
the  nature  of  an  additional  and  controlling  idea. 

Similarly,  we  may  have  occasion  to  think  of  the  opposite 
of  a  given  concept,  or  of  a  subordinate,  or  the  superordinate 
or  the  symbol  of  a  given  concept.  In  any  case  one  idea  calls 
up  a  second  under  the  guidance  of  a  third. 

We  may  not  only  occupy  our  minds  with  ideas  of  the 
color,  size,  shape,  etc.,  of  objects,  as  referred  to  above,  but 
we  may  compare  two  objects  as  to  color,  size,  shape,  weight, 
motion,  acceleration,  symmetry,  etc.,  and  judge  which  is 
the  best  suited  to  our  needs.  Of  two  individuals  we  may 
compare  the  good  looks,  cordiality,  sincerity,  hospitality, 
integrity,  adaptability,  intelligence,  etc.,  as  conceived  in 
ideas  of  conduct,  feelings,  appearance,  facial  expression,  and 
of  the  many  circumstances  under  which  the  impressions  were 
gained.  All  these  mental  activities  dealing  with  ideas  as 
material — their  association,  recall,  generalization,  abstrac- 
tion, comparison,  judgment,  etc.,  are  elements  in  adaptation? 
yet  they  may  be  experienced  or  accomplished  quite  inde- 
pendently of  words.  The  idea  of  a  color  is  not  a  word.  The 
idea  of  one  color  being  more  intense  than  another  need  not 
have  anything  to  do  with  language.  The  choice  of  this  or 
that  color  for  an  aesthetic  purpose  does  not  require  language, 
nor  does  the  act  which  the  choice  calls  forth.  Yet  all  this 
is  adaptation. 

4.  Words  may  be  the  Material  of  Thought. — As  has  been 
suggested  throughout  the  discussion,  words  may  be  the 
material  of  thought.  The  place  of  words  in  the  range  of 
material  of  thought  may  be  stated  as  follows.  The  material 


DO  WE  THINK  IN  WORDS?  407 

of  thought,  as  explained  below,  begins  with  perceptions; 
then  come  images  resembling  perceptions,  then  more  and 
more  attenuated  images  or  aspects  of  images  singled  out  by 
abstraction,  and  finally  symbols.  By  symbol  is  meant  any 
concept  which  is  used  in  place  of  another.  The  best  illustra- 
tion of  thinking  in  symbols  is  in  the  case  of  the  number  symbol 
system  used  in  arithmetic  and  algebra.  The  idea  of  eight 
(not  in  the  word  but  the  number:  ********)  [s  represented 
by  the  symbol:  8.  The  idea  of  seven  (seven  things:  *******) 
is  symbolized  by  the  figure:  7.  Now  if  we  have  the  problem 
of  finding  the  sum  of  these  numbers  (********  and  *******) 
we  may  do  so  by  translating  them  into  their  respective 
symbols  and  give  our  attention  to  the  symbols  only.  Having 
previously  formed  an  association  between  the  symbols,  7 
and  8,  and  the  symbol  of  their  sum:  15,  the  symbol  15  is 
called  up  when  the  symbols,  7  and  8,  and  the  guiding  idea 
of  summation  are  in  mind.  We  may  then  proceed  to  make 
other  arithmetical  computations  in  terms  of  number  symbols 
only,  letting  these  call  up  the  number  idea  (**** — )  when 
needed.  Similarly  in  algebra  we  may  let  x  represent  one 
number  with  which  the  problem  deals  and  let  y  represent 
another  number,  etc.,  and  then  by  means  of  habits  established 
in  connection  with  these  symbols  we  may  do  thinking  of  a 
simple  type  in  lieu  of  what  would  be  far  more  difficult  if  done 
with  the  original  concepts  of  number.  This  type  of  thinking 
is  exemplified  in  the  following  algebraic  reasoning: 

If  xz  —  yz  =  2  then  (x  —  y)(x  +  y)  =  z. 

There  are  of  course  many  kinds  of  symbols.  In  addition 
to  the  number  symbols  just  mentioned  there  are  the  symbols 
of  operation  upon  numbers  such  as  those  of  addition,  multi- 
plication, integration,  involution,  etc.,  there  are  the  symbols 
of  musical  notation,  symbols  of  punctuation  (?,  !,  ",  *,  -), 
symbols  on  maps  representing  roads,  trees,  buildings,  bridges, 
tunnels,  etc.  (an  engineer  can  think  very  effectively  in  these 
symbols).  There  are  even  symbolic  facial  expressions  used 
by  actors  to  portray  emotions  which  off  the  stage  would  not 
be  expected  to  produce  those  expressions.  A  skull  and 
cross  bones  symbolizes  danger.  The  flag  symbolizes  country, 


408  ARTHUR  S.  OTIS 

etc.  Last,  and  most  important,  of  course,  words  and  sen- 
tences symbolize  thought  of  every  description.  Occasionally 
we  feel  that  we  have  experienced  some  thought  or  sensation 
or  feeling  which  cannot  be  expressed  in  words.  But  in 
general  all  ordinary  thoughts  and  feelings  can  be  represented 
by  some  word  or  sentence. 

We  see  therefore  that  language  constitutes  only  one  of  the 
various  kinds  of  symbolization,  and  symbols  constitute  only  one 
type  of  material  of  thought. 

Words  are  themselves  the  material  of  thought  under  many 
circumstances.  Whenever  we  have  to  communicate  thoughts 
to  another  or  learn  the  thoughts  of  another  through  language 
we  have  to  deal  with  words.  By  far  the  greatest  use  of 
language  of  course  is  in  the  calling  up  of  language  symbols 
to  represent  meanings  or  the  calling  up  of  meanings  repre- 
sented by  language.  Occasionally  however  we  may  think 
in  terms  of  language  almost  exclusively,  as  when  dealing  with 
the  rhyme  and  rhythm  of  poetry.  In  the  case  of  syllogistic 
reasoning  we  may  be  truly  said  to  be  thinking  in  words,  when 
the  expression  "All  A  is  B  and  all  B  is  C"  calls  up  the  language 
idea:  "All  A  is  C,"  or  when  part  of  a  sentence  suggests  the 
rest  as  "All  is  not  gold  that ." 

5.  Language  ike  Symbolization  of  Meaning. — We  have 
attempted  throughout  this  discussion  to  distinguish  clearly 
between  a  meaning  and  the  language  by  which  it  is  symbol- 
ized. We  cite  the  following  illustrations  to  bring  out  this 
distinction  still  more  clearly. 

If  one  says :  "  I  saw  John  Jones  on  the  street  this  morning  " 
the  hearer  will  get  the  meaning  of  the  sentence  at  once. 
"Getting  the  meaning"  means  to  the  ordinary  person  getting 
an  image,  more  or  less  faint  perhaps,  of  the  speaker  looking 
at  Jones  on  the  street.  But  let  us  take  another  sentence. 
Here  is  one  in  which  the  meaning  of  a  new  (coined)  word  is 
stated.  Every  word  in  the  statement  of  the  definition  except 
the  new  one  is  perfectly  intelligible  and  familiar  and  the 
statement  is  a  perfectly  logical  and  meaningful  one,  yet  we 
are  confident  that  the  reader  will  not  get  the  meaning  from 
the  language  on  first  reading.  This  is  the  sentence:  "Let 


DO  WE  THINK  IN  WORDS?  4<>9 

us  define  the  word,  incration,  as  meaning  the  increase  in  the 
number  of  feet  per  second  per  second  by  which  the  motion 
of  a  body  is  accelerated."  Anyone  who  has  gotten  the 
meaning  of  this  sentence  clearly  should  be  able  to  point  out 
immediately  the  error  in  the  following  statement,  which  if 
correct  would  follow  as  a  corollary  to  the  above  definition: 
"The  unit  of  incration  is  one  foot  per  second  per  second." 
(The  correction  is  indicated  in  a  footnote.)  If  the  reader  is 
unable  to  point  out  the  error  it  is  merely  because  he  has  not 
gotten  the  meaning  of  the  definition,  which  is  something  quite 
apart  from  the  words  by  which  it  is  symbolized  and  consists 
of  images  either  of  the  motion  of  a  body  or  of  the  path  of  its 
motion.  Without  such  images  we  are  confident  the  meaning 
can  in  no  way  be  appreciated.1 

As  has  been  said,  the  utterance  of  sentences  or  of  parts 
of  sentences  or  of  analogous  statements  often  helps  to  bring 
out  the  meaning,  that  is,  helps  to  call  up  the  imagery  neces- 
sary to  build  up  the  meaning,  or  helps  to  fix  the  meaning  in 
mind  by  symbolizing  it  after  it  is  appreciated.  But  the 
meaning  may  exist  entirely  independent  and  apart  from 
any  utterance,  either  overt  or  implicit. 

One  often  hears  the  expression  from  pupils  in  school: 
"I  know  but  I  can't  tell."  This  is  generally  a  simple  case 
of  having  a  meaning  or  idea  without  the  ability  to  symbolize 
it  in  language. 

Moreover,  as  has  been  stated,  even  an  adult  may  have 
experienced  perceptions,  ideas,  or  feelings  which  he  will 
declare  cannot  be  expressed  in  words.  Even  if  they  could, 

1  The  correct  statement  is:  The  unit  of  incration  is  one  foot  per  second  per  second 
per  second. 

A  reasonable  comprehension  of  the  meanings  of  these  statements  may  be  built 
up  with  the  help  of  the  following  leading  statements.  The  rate  of  motion  of  a  body 
is  the  number  of  feet  per  second  which  it  moves.  The  unit  of  rate  is  one  foot  per 
second.  The  acceleration  of  a  moving  body  is  the  increase  in  its  rate,  that  is,  the 
increase  in  the  number  of  feet  per  second  which  it  moves  in  succeeding  seconds.  The 
unit  of  acceleration  is  one  foot  per  second  per  second,  that  is,  one  foot  per  second  every 
second.  And  again,  the  incration  of  a  moving  body  is  the  increase  in  its  acceleration, 
that  is,  the  increase  (from  second  to  second)  in  the  number  of  feet  per  second  by  which 
its  rate  is  increased,  or  in  other  words,  it  is  the  number  of  feet  per  second  per  second 
by  which  the  motion  of  the  body  is  accelerated.  The  unit  of  incration  is  the  unit  of 
acceleration  every  second,  that  is,  it  is  one  foot  per  second  per  second  per  second. 


410  ARTHUR  S.  OTIS 

his  inability  to  do  so  testifies  to  the  independence  of  the 
thoughts  from  the  language  by  which  it  would  be  symbolized. 
We  say  of  our  memory  of  a  sunset  that  it  was  'indescribable' 
and  'would  have  to  be  seen  to  be  appreciated,'  which  is 
entirely  true.  We  say,  'Words  fail  me'  regarding  the 
expression  of  our  thoughts  of  past  emotional  experiences. 
The  emotional  experiences  of  love,  hate,  fear,  anger,  etc., 
may  be  the  material  of  thought  just  as  well  as  the  experience 
of  perceiving  the  color  blue.  Even  our  best  attempts  to 
express  our  thoughts  of  experiences  in  words  often  fail  to 
carry  full  meaning  to  the  hearer  unless  he  has  had  a  similar 
experience.  Thus,  one  may  say  that  an  experience  was  like 
that  of  a  sudden  drop  in  an  elevator  or  like  flying  in  an 
aeroplane,  but  unless  the  hearer  has  had  an  analogous 
sensation  or  experience  the  expression  is  devoid  of  essential 
meaning  to  him.  What  can  the  expression,  'like  being  struck 
by  lightning'  or  'like  finding  oneself  caught  under  the  ice' 
mean  to  one  who  has  not  had  the  experience  in  comparison 
to  what  it  means  to  one  who  has  had  the  experience!  Yet 
the  language  is  identical  in  the  two  cases.  One  and  the 
same  expression  from  the  lips  of  an  oratorical  person  may 
convey  a  meaning  to  one  hearer  which  will  call  forth  tears,  a 
meaning  to  another  hearer  which  will  call  forth  anger,  and  a 
meaning  to  still  another  hearer  which  will  call  forth  laughter. 
Such  a  phenomenon  would  be  of  course  entirely  impossible 
if  there  were  but  one  meaning  to  the  expression,  a  meaning 
inherent  in  the  language  itself.  It  is  a  platitude  that  the 
meaning  of  language  is  something  which  is  brought  to  it 
from  the  experience  of  the  hearer,  that  it  does  not  reside  in 
the  language. 

6.  The  Genesis  of  Language. — Not  only  may  we  have 
thoughts  for  which  we  cannot  think  of  the  existing  appro- 
priate language,  but  we  may  often  have  an  idea  for  which 
there  is  no  corresponding  word  or  phrase.  Indeed  language 
is  built  up  by  the  coining  of  new  words  and  phrases  that  are 
needed  to  symbolize  new  thoughts  for  which  no  corresponding 
language  exists.  The  word,  automobile,  for  example,  did 
not  come  into  existence  until  after  there  had  been  made, 


DO  WE  THINK  IN  WORDS? 

or  at  least  conceived,  a  machine  which  would  move  itself, 
and  which  needed  a  name.  Similarly  the  expression,  'carry 
on,'  came  into  use  in  response  to  the  need  of  a  name  for  an 
action  which  was  well  comprehended  but  for  which  no  con- 
venient language  equivalent  existed.  Ideas  originate  first; 
afterward  they  are  named — symbolized  in  language. 

Perhaps  the  clearest  example  of  the  temporal  relation 
between  the  genesis  of  ideas  and  their  symbolization  is  the 
case  of  the  naming  of  persons.  First  the  child,  which  we 
perceive,  is  born.  Afterward  it  is  given  a  name.  Why  do 
we  give  a  child  a  name?  It  is,  of  course,  for  the  reason  that 
to  refer  to  it  always  by  description  would  be  cumbersome 
and  inaccurate.  When  we  think  of  a  person  deliberately  we 
think  of  his  form  and  features,  his  speech,  manner,  expression, 
etc.  When  we  think  of  him  more  fleetingly,  however,  our 
imagery  becomes  attenuated,  even  perhaps  to  the  extent 
exemplified  by  the  representation  of  Roosevelt  by  merely  a 
pair  of  glasses  and  a  row  of  teeth.  But  for  the  purpose  of 
one  person  conveying  the  thought  of  an  individual  to  another, 
such  attenuated  imagery  is  inexpedient.  We  therefore 
symbolize  the  whole  picture  or  idea  of  the  individual  by  a 
single  word  (a  name).  The  name  then,  in  cases  of  rapid 
thinking,  may  nearly  take  the  place  of  the  concept  of  the 
individual  as  imaged.  The  name,  however,  still  does  carry 
with  it  something  of  the  original  imagery.  The  idea  of 
'James'  to  one  person  carries  with  it  something  which  char- 
acterizes his  brother,  James.  The  idea,  James,  to  another 
person,  carries  with  it  something  which  characterizes  his 
uncle,  James,  a  different  individual.  This  additional  some- 
thing is  needed  to  constitute  the  difference  in  meaning  be- 
tween 'James'  for  the  one  person  and  'James'  for  the  other. 
To  a  third  person  who  knows  no  one  by  the  name  of  James, 
the  idea  is  merely  a  word,  known  to  refer  to  some  individual. 

On  the  other  hand  the  perception  of  a  person  whose  name 
is  not  known  does  not  carry  with  it  any  idea  of  a  name,  nor 
need  any  word  come  to  the  mind.  When  I  see  a  man  I  do 
not  think  'man.'  When  I  think  of  a  crowd  of  persons  I  do 
not  think  of  a  crowd  of  words!  Language  is  as  distinct  from 


412  ARTHUR  S.  OTIS 

the  ideas  it  represents  as  the  name  of  a  person  is  distinct 
from  the  perception  of  the  person  himself. 

An  infant  of  course  does  not  use  language  habits  until  a 
year  or  so  after  birth.  Yet  an  infant  can  think — perceive, 
compare,  judge,  choose,  decide,  act  upon  decision,  etc.— 
before  language  habits  begin.  The  material  of  his  thoughts 
is  the  sights,  sounds,  smell,  tastes,  feelings,  etc.,  which  he 
experiences  throughout  his  waking  state. 

To  illustrate  the  genesis  of  language  habits  we  must  go 
back  to  the  early  days  of  a  child's  life  when  it  is  just  beginning 
those  'Abbreviated  and  short-circuited  actions  (which)  be- 
come a  necessity  if  it  is  to  hold  its  own  in  that  environment 
and  make  progress'  (p.  319).  The  child's  perception  of  its 
doll,  its  desire  for  the  doll,  its  idea  of  searching  for  the  doll 
when  not  in  sight,  its  idea  of  creeping  toward  the  doll  when 
seen,  its  idea  of  reaching  for  the  doll  when  within  reach,  its 
idea  of  grasping  and  the  new  ideas  which  arise  from  the 
manipulation  of  the  doll — assuming  these  ideas  sufficiently 
well  fixed  by  habit  that  the  actions  have  reached  an  '  abbrevi- 
ated and  short-circuited'  stage  and  are  purposeful  and 
adaptive — these  ideas  constitute  the  beginnings  of  thought 
(conscious  adjustment  to  the  environment). 

The  stimulus,  'tata'  (p.  320),  cannot  call  up  the  concept, 
doll,  before  the  concept,  doll,  is  in  existence.  Nor  can  it 
create  the  idea.  The  child  must  have  some  idea  of  the  doll, 
formed  from  perceptions  of  the  doll  itself,  before  the  idea  of 
'tata'  can  be  associated  with  it.  Language  in  general 
bears  just  the  same  relation  to  thought  in  general  that  the 
idea,  'tata,'  as  a  word,  bears  to  the  idea  of  the  doll,  as  some- 
thing seen,  touched,  etc. 

Similarly  the  idea  of  number  is  formed  before  any  symbol 
representing  number  can  be  associated  with  it.  We  may 
talk  about  number  in  the  hearing  of  a  child  for  months  after 
it  has  begun  the  use  of  language,  but  until  the  child  has  by 
observation  and  comparison  become  conscious  of  the  two- 
ness  of  its  hands,  of  the  two-ness  of  its  feet,  and  of  the  two-ness 
of  many  other  separate  things,  so  that  the  idea  of  two-ness  as 
an  abstraction  becomes  a  separate  idea  in  the  child's  mind — 


DO  WE  THINK  IN  WORDS?  4*3 

until  this  time  the  sound  of  the  word  'two*  is  meaningless 
to  the  child,  and  only  attains  meaning  when  finally  associated 
with  this  abstract  idea  of  the  two-ness  of  any  two  things. 
The  meaning  comes  first;  afterward  the  language  symbol 
(word)  is  associated  with  the  meaning  and  may  be  substi- 
tuted for  it  when  occasion  demands.  One  has  but  to  attempt 
to  teach  a  child,  who  is  just  learning  to  talk,  to  count  and 
deal  with  number  concepts  to  see  how  absolutely  meaningless 
the  words  are  to  the  child  until  he  has  had  opportunity  in  the 
course  of  his  daily  experiences  to  make  the  abstractions  neces- 
sary to  form  these  ideas.  We  may  teach  a  three-year  child 
to  pronounce  perfectly  the  sentence:  "The  square  root  of 
twenty-five  is  five,"  and  if  the  action  of  language  mechanisms 
constituted  thought  we  should  expect  the  child  to  understand 
perfectly  the  meaning  of  what  he  had  said!  Further  com- 
ment seems  unnecessary. 

It  will  be  noted  that  in  this  discussion  it  has  been  neces- 
sary to  use  concepts  which  are  not  found  in  Behaviorist 
psychology.  These  are  the  concepts  of  'meaning,'  'idea/ 
'concept,'  'conscious,'  'purposeful,'  'association  of  ideas,' 
'abstraction,'  'symbolization,'  etc.  Yet  these  are  funda- 
mental to  structural  psychology  and  from  the  above  dis- 
cussion we  deem  it  apparent  that  a  consideration  of  the 
acquisition  of  language  habits,  their  function  in  thinking, 
and  the  material  of  truly  non-language  thought,  is  totally 
inadequate  without  these  concepts.  To  be  sure  we  find 
passages  in  a  Behaviorist  psychology  attempting  to  state 
what  goes  on  in  the  mind  of  an  individual.  Thus  (p.  305) : 
"We  manipulate  vocally"  (in  attempting  to  recall  the 
name  of  a  familiar  person)  "by  running  over  the  names 
beginning  with  each  succeeding  letter  of  the  alphabet,  or  by 
saying  'black  hair,'  'blue  eyes,'  'six  feet  tall,'  and  the  like." 
This  seems  to  the  writer  to  be  one  of  several  excursions  quite 
outside  the  realm  of  Behaviorist  psychology.  He  does  not 
know  whence  these  ideas  came  but  judges  that  it  was  by 
some  sort  of  inference,  partly  because  the  Behaviorist  does 
not  use  introspection  and  partly  because  he  is  unable  to 
corroborate  them  by  introspection. 


414  ARTHUR  S.  OTIS 

7.  The  Inadequacy  of  the  Behaviorist  Conception  of  Thought. 
— To  illustrate  what  is  believed  to  be  the  wholly  inadequate 
conception  of  thought  as  entertained  by  the  Behaviorist, 
we  cite  the  soliloquy  postulated  on  page  332.  "The  implicit 
word  processes  (aroused  by  whatever  previous  stimulus) 
'it's  a  fine  day,  I  think  I  will  go  to  the  races;  it's  twelve 
o'clock  now,  I  have  just  time  to  catch  the  train,'  serve  to  start 
you  to  get  your  hat  and  field  glasses.  Some  unfinished 
work  meets  your  eye  or  other  conflicting  word  processes  are 
aroused,  as  'but  I  have  to  write  those  letters  and  I  have  a 
luncheon  engagement  with  X.'  These  tend  to  drive  the 
organism  as  a  whole  into  some  other  form  of  action;  for  a 
time  there  is  a  conflict  (inhibition).  Finally  when  the 
conflict  is  over  the  final  word  act  issues,  'Well,  I  guess  I'll 
have  to  give  up  the  races  and  write  those  letters  and  keep 
my  engagement  with  X.'  Here  we  see  implicit  word  pro- 
cesses tending  to  arouse  overt  acts  and  actually  arousing 
the  initial  steps.  But  since  the  human  individual  is  a  com- 
pletely integrated  affair,  associated  word  processes  arise 
which  may  drive  the  organism  into  a  totally  different  form  of 
activity  from  that  which  was  first  initiated." 

The  writer  contends  that  the  'previous  stimulus'  together 
with  the  mental  activity  which  called  forth  this  soliloquy 
would  be  sufficient  to  start  one  to  get  his  hat  and  field  glasses, 
without  the  accompaniment  of  any  action  of  language 
mechanisms,  and  that  such  action  itself  would  not  suffice. 
The  reasoning  is  as  follows.  Let  us  suppose  the  previous 
stimulus  to  be  the  perception  of  the  green  grass  and  sun- 
shine and  warmth  of  the  outdoors.  This  perception  called 
forth  by  association  the  memory  of  previous  days  when 
races  were  attended  and  of  the  accompanying  pleasure. 
These  memories  contained  the  urge  to  renew  the  pleasures. 
They  gave  rise  to  the  decision  which  is  expressed  in  the 
language:  "It's  a  fine  day,  I  think  I  will  go  to  the  races." 
The  decision  made,  the  thought  took  form  in  vocal  expression. 
At  this  point  either  the  clock  struck  twelve,  this  serving  as  a 
stimulus,  or  the  idea  of  going  to  the  races  naturally  called 
up  the  idea  of  when  to  go,  which  in  turn  suggested  the 


DO  WE  THINK  IN  WORDS?  415 

idea  of  looking  at  the  clock,  resulting  in  the  perception  that 
it  was  just  twelve  o'clock.  None  of  this  mental  activity 
required  language.  The  perception  of  the  time  of  day 
having  been  made  in  one  way  or  another,  the  idea  called 
up  the  words  which  would  express  it  and  the  individual  added, 
'It's  twelve  o'clock  now.'  What  happened  next?  Presum- 
ably at  this  point  came  the  idea  of  going  to  the  races  by 
train,  followed  immediately  by  the  idea  which  if  expressed 
in  words  would  be,  'When  does  the  train  go?'  which  in  turn 
called  forth  the  memory  that  the  train  goes  (let  us  say)  at 
twelve-fifteen.  Immediately  there  came  to  the  mind  the 
idea  of  the  preparation  which  is  necessary  to  catch  the 
train  and  a  judgment  is  made  as  to  how  long  this  will  take, 
based  upon  past  experience.  The  individual  must  also  go 
through  a  certain  mental  operation  of  determining  how  much 
time  there  is  available  before  train  time  and  make  a  com- 
parison between  these  lengths  of  time  in  order  to  make  the 
decision  which  when  expressed  in  words  is,  'I  have  just  time 
to  catch  the  train.'  This  idea  possibly  suggests  the  idea  of 
haste  which  together  with  the  idea  of  going  to  the  races  calls 
forth  ideas  of  the  appropriate  preparation,  getting  the  hat 
and  field  glasses,  etc.  These  latter  ideas  take  form  in  action. 
In  view  of  the  obvious  necessity  for  the  mental  activity  of 
perception,  judgment,  decision,  etc.,  intervening  between 
the  advents  of  the  ideas  which  took  form  in  the  language 
quoted,  we  submit  that,  as  stated  above,  it  is  impossible 
that  the  soliloquy  postulated  could  of  itself  have  given 
rise  to  the  getting  of  the  hat  and  field  glasses.  Moreover, 
the  ideas  themselves  which  suggested  the  soliloquy  could 
have  given  rise  to  the  acts  and  there  need  have  been  no 
language,  explicit  or  implicit,  involved  whatever.  Thus, 
the  ideas  of  time  may  have  been  conceived  in  visual  imagery — 
the  imagery  of  the  face  of  the  clock  and  the  movement  or 
path  of  the  minute  hand.  No  language  is  required.  The 
ideas  of  preparation  for  the  train  would  consist  of  memory 
of  the  acts  of  getting  hat  and  field  glasses,  walking  or  riding 
to  the  station,  buying  the  ticket,  etc.,  these  consisting  chiefly 
of  visual  and  kinaesthetic  images.  No  language  is  necessary. 


416  ARTHUR  S.  OTIS 

The  ideas  involved  in  the  judgment  of  distance  (to  the 
station)  or  of  time  required  for  preparation  and  traversing 
the  distances,  etc.,  would  be  kinsesthetic  or  visual  or  other 
ideas  of  space  and  motion,  the  comparison  of  these  ideas  of 
space  and  motion,  etc.,  resulting  in  ideas  of  the  relations 
between  them.  No  language  is  required.  Moreover,  the 
ideas  which  take  form  in  the  acts  of  getting  the  hat  and  field 
glasses  are  visual,  tactual,  and  kinaesthetic  and  are  quite 
independent  of  language.  The  fact  is,  one  could  conceivably 
note  the  weather,  decide  to  go  to  the  races,  make  preparations, 
board  the  train,  hand  the  conductor  a  ticket,  note  the  progress 
of  the  train,  get  off  at  the  race  track,  pay  the  entrance  fee, 
and  watch  the  races,  all  with  mental  activity  and  acts  in 
no  way  involving  language.  Any  amount  of  soliloquy  or 
conversation  may  accompany  the  expedition,  but  this  is 
wholly  incidental,  secondary,  and  unessential. 

8.  Introspection. — We  believe  that  Behaviorist  psychology 
is  entirely  sound  within  its  own  sphere,  that  is,  so  long  as  it 
confines  its  study  to  the  behavior  of  the  individual  as  seen 
from  without.  A  psychology  so  limited,  will,  of  course, 
necessarily  leave  untouched  a  vast  field  of  useful  knowledge 
which  can  in  time  be  made  scientific  where  not  already  so, 
after  extensive  investigation,  comparison  of  findings,  deter- 
mination of  general  tendencies,  and  the  careful  observation 
of  everyday  experiences.  But  should  one  desire  to  explore 
the  realms  of  psychology  outside  the  scope  of  Behaviorism, 
he  must  then  supplement  his  external  observation  by  as 
thoroughgoing,  extensive,  and  careful  an  examination  of  that 
which  takes  place  within  the  mind — as  seen  from  within — 
as  is  possible  by  highly  practiced  and  trained  introspection. 

To  direct -the  attention  to  the  color  of  an  object  is  a 
very  easy  matter.  To  direct  the  attention  to  the  difference 
in  shade  between  two  colors  may  be  slightly  less  easy  but  it 
is  entirely  possible.  To  direct  the  attention  to  the  idea 
of  the  aesthetic  value  of  the  colors  requires  perhaps  appre- 
ciably more  practice,  but  it  is  none  the  less  possible.  How- 
ever, to  direct  the  attention  to  the  nature  of  the  mental 
process  of  choosing  between  two  colors,  and  to  the  manner 


DO  WE  THINK  IN  WORDS?  417 

in  which  the  choice  gives  rise  to  appropriate  acts,  may  be 
quite  difficult,  not  to  say  impossible,  for  the  inexperienced 
person.  Yet  these  phenomena  are  available  for  observation 
no  less  truly  than  the  habit  of  typewriting  is  open  to  acquisi- 
tion or  the  length  of  a  rail  is  capable  of  being  measured  to 
the  thousandth  of  an  inch.  These  accomplishments  require 
long  practice  or  minute  observation,  but  we  do  not  say  they 
are  impossible.  An  unpracticed  person  cannot  direct  his 
attention  to  the  less  tangible  aspects  of  thought  any  more 
than  he  can  play  a  theme  on  the  piano.  Because  it  is  difficult 
however,  one  does  not  forego  the  learning  of  piano  playing, 
if  he  desires  to  learn  to  play.  Again,  it  is  possible  that  no 
two  observers  might  obtain  the  same  measurement  of  a 
rail  to  the  thousandth  of  an  inch.  Nevertheless  we  do  not 
say  that  measurement  is  of  no  use  in  physics.  Observers 
can  nearly  all  agree  on  the  length  of  a  rail  to  the  tenth  of  an 
inch,  and  on  the  length  of  a  needle  to  the  hundredth  of  an 
inch  not  to  say  to  the  thousandth. 

Similarly  in  psychology,  those  inexperienced  in  intro- 
spection may  not  be  able  to  distinguish  between  middle  C 
on  the  piano  and  the  C  an  octave  above,  or  to  observe  that 
they  see  objects  double  which  are  not  focused  upon.  More- 
over, persons  highly  trained  in  introspection  may  not  always 
be  able  to  distinguish  between  the  perception  of  a  very  faint 
sound  (as  the  distant  ticking  of  a  watch)  from  the  auditory 
image  of  the  sound  (imagined  sound)  nor  to  state  just  what 
constitutes  the  mental  element  of  difference  between  the 
emotions  of  fear  and  anger.  But  there  should  be  little  differ- 
ence of  opinion  between  persons  of  extended  experience  in 
introspection  as  to  whether  the  material  of  our  thoughts, 
when  we  create  new  ideas,  and  conceive  new  modes  of  activity 
in  the  fields  of  music,  art,  drama,  mechanics,  etc.,  is  in  the 
form  of  language  or  in  the  form  of  tones,  visual  pictures,  etc. 

9.  Summary. — There  may  be  no  experimental  proof 
whether  or  not  thinking — conscious  adjustment  to  the 
environment — is  invariably  accompanied  by  the  actuation 
of  some  language  mechanism  as  the  larynx,  lips,  fingers,  etc., 
in  the  incipient  production  of  some  form  of  language,  spoken 


418  ARTHUR  S.  OTIS 

or  written,  but  the  evidence  would  seem  to  favor  the  belief 
that  no  such  invariable  accompaniment  is  necessary.  One 
uses  the  eyes  in  observing  objects  attended  to  almost  through- 
out the  waking  state.  It  would  seem  more  plausible  to 
assert  therefore  that  some  form  of  "implicit"  eye  movement 
is  a  necessary  accompaniment  of  all  thinking.  Much  evi- 
dence such  as  that  from  the  observation  of  a  chess  player 
studying  his  moves  could  be  brought  forth  in  support  of 
this  view.  All  this,  however,  is  quite  beside  the  point. 
The  claim  is  made  by  the  Behaviorist  that  "thought  is  the 
action  of  language  mechanisms"  (italics  mine).  Certainly 
the  evidence  against  such  an  assertion  is  overwhelming. 

Man  is  an  organism  highly  adapted  physiologically  to  his 
environment,  provided  with  sense  organs  of  sight,  hearing, 
taste,  smell,  touch,  pain,  heat,  cold,  muscle  movement, 
body  position,  etc.  Each  of  these  sense  organs  is  capable 
of  giving  rise  to  sensations  which  take  the  form,  in  the 
mind,  of  images  or  image  patterns.  (The  word  image  is 
used  in  a  very  broad  sense  as  shown  below.)  The  organism 
has  at  its  disposal  any  or  all  of  these  incoming  percepts  or 
stored  images  or  image  patterns  as  material  for  thought,  for 
working  over  into  new  combinations,  new  thoughts,  which 
will  give  rise  to  new  actions,  new  adaptations  to  the  environ- 
ment. In  the  event  of  the  bringing  together  of  two  or  more 
concepts — images — or  of  the  dividing  of  one  concept  into 
two  or  more  (as  when  a  child  first  separates  from  the  concept 
ball  the  concept  roundness) — in  the  event  of  this  working 
over  of  concepts,  they  are  necessarily  abbreviated,  composited, 
exemplified,  attenuated,  or  substituted  for  by  others.  If  the 
substituted  concepts  are  of  a  kind  remote  from  the  kind 
for  which  they  are  substituted  but  are  more  or  less  definite 
and  commonly  understood,  we  call  them  symbols.  A  careful 
description  of  the  manner  in  which  thought  material  is 
abbreviated,  composited,  attenuated  (even  to  a  point  which 
is  considered  by  some  psychologists  to  be  'imageless'),  etc., 
is  of  course  quite  impossible  within  the  limits  of  this  article. 

However,  the  mental  activity  which  brings  forth  a  new 
act  may  be  the  result  of  the  combination  or  division  or  other 


DO  WE  THINK  IN  WORDS?  419 

working  over  of  any  type  of  mental  material — the  bare  sensa- 
tion, the  fresh  vivid  full  percept,  the  fairly  vivid  memory 
image,  or  the  image  or  image  pattern  when  abbreviated,  or 
attenuated,  or  composited,  or  exemplified,  or  in  any  manner 
generalized  or  particularized,  or  finally  in  the  form  of  symbols. 
And  language,  as  has  been  shown,  is  but  one  general  type  of 
symbol  system. 

In  conclusion,  then,  let  it  be  said  that  we  may  think  in 
words,  and  when  we  do,  the  thinking  may  be  accompanied 
by  the  action  of  language  mechanisms.  But  thought — 
even  conscious  mental  adjustment — is  not  restricted  to  the 
material  of  language  any  more  than  it  is  restricted  to  the 
material  of  musical  tones  or  of  architectural  designs  or  of 
facial  expressions,  nor  is  it  restricted  to  the  action  of  language 
mechanisms  any  more  than  it  is  to  the  mechanism  of  hearing 
or  of  sight  or  of  locomotion. 


A  BEHAVIORISTIC  ACCOUNT  OF  SLEEP 

BY  CHARLES  H.  WOOLBERT 

Division  of  Public  Speaking,  University  of  Illinois 

The  phenomenon  of  sleep  does  not  lend  itself  conveniently 
to  explanation  in  terms  of  sensation,  image,  and  feeling. 
Accordingly  structural  psychology  can  offer  little  by  way  of  a 
description  of  the  state  of  sleep.  The  behaviorist,  on  the 
other  hand,  believing  that  his  definition  of  consciousness 
offers  a  statement  not  only  of  what  consciousness  is,  but  of 
what  it  is  not,  is  in  a  position  to  explain  sleep.  If,  as  be- 
haviorism asserts,  mind  is  a  matter  of  reflex  connections  always 
involving  the  movement,  tension,  or  tonicity  of  muscles  and 
always  correlated  with  the  activity  of  glands,  then  conscious- 
ness, in  its  varying  degrees  of  clearness,  is  a  matter  of  degrees 
of  complexity  and  ordination  among  systems  of  muscular 
action.  A  high  degree  of  consciousness  thus  becomes  synony- 
mous with  an  intricate  and  ordered  complexity  of  tonicity  in 
muscular  systems;  while  a  low  degree  of  consciousness  is 
equivalent  to  a  complexity  of  low  degree  and  an  ordering  of 
simple  texture.  Consciousness  thus  may  be,  speaking  in  a 
paradox,  scattered,  involving  perchance  abundant  activity — 
by  way  of  muscular  tonus  in  various  muscle  systems — but 
activity  of  a  low  degree  of  intricacy  in  organization. 

If  consciousness,  then,  be  a  matter  of  the  degree  of  com- 
plexity of  interacting  muscle  systems,  non-consciousness  is  a 
lack  of  activity  or  else  a  lack  of  this  complexity.  In  either 
case  the  factor  of  complexity  is  vital  and  needs  describing. 
Behaviorism's  explanation  of  this  concept  is  based  on  the 
continuative  function  of  the  sense  endings  within  the  muscles. 
Always  stimulated  by  any  muscular  event,  they  afford  the 
means  for  causing  a  single  inaugurating  stimulation  to  rever- 
berate through  a  long  series  of  tensions,  or  else  to  provide  a 
continued  hardening  of  some  one  set  of  muscles.  The  type 
of  tensions  running  in  a  series  is  what  is  called  the  chain 

420 


A  BEUAFIORISTIC  ACCOUNT  OF  SLEEP 

reflex;  the  continued  is  that  called  circular.  Chain  reflexes 
have  much  to  do  with  that  complexity  of  interacting  muscle 
systems  that  makes  consciousness.  Carried  on  by  means  of 
proprioceptor  organs  of  stimulation,  they  have  a  right  of  way 
and  a  special  kind  of  clearance.  This  insures  them  continuity 
and  lends  a  measurable  degree  of  stability  to  the  complexity 
of  structure  that  makes  up  consciousness. 

This  description  recognizes,  first,  that  the  muscularity  of 
the  body  occurs  in  fairly  well-defined  systems:  as  those  of 
the  back,  the  legs,  the  head,  the  face,  and  the  throat;  and, 
secondly,  that  these  muscle  systems  are  set  off  one  by  the 
other  and  in  a  certain  order.  This  order  is  based  on  priority. 
Priority  of  muscle  systems  is,  in  general,  a  matter  of  pre- 
cedence in  the  development  of  working  efficiency  in  reflex 
arcs.  Those  systems  that  have  an  early  development  history 
come  to  have  a  pronounced  control  over  systems  developed 
later,  in  that  the  systems  developed  later  get  their  initial 
determinations  from  the  workings  of  the  habitual  responses 
of  the  earlier.  Their  most  intense  determinations  are,  both 
earlier  and  later,  then,  conditioned  by  the  determinations  of 
the  systems  already  habituated.  Their  capacity  for  quick 
and  valuable  response  depends  thus  very  largely  upon  their 
close  coordination  and  cooperation  with  habitual  reactions 
of  systems  determined  at  an  earlier  stage  of  development. 

An  understanding  of  sleep  requires  a  description  of  this 
development  order,  a  description  of  gross  muscle  systems 
and  a  statement  of  their  superordination  and  subordination. 
This  is  found  in  an  account  of  the  operation  of  Pawlow's 
Law,  as  manifested  in  the  conditioned,  chain,  and  circular 
reflexes. 

By  Pawlow's  Law  a  reflex  arc  may  be  a  factor  in  new 
activities  by  the  stimulation  of  sense  endings  imbedded  in  the 
muscles  that  are  contracted  by  the  operation  of  such  an  arc. 
Every  motor  process  stirs  a  muscle;  this  stirring  starts  new 
impulses;  and  these  impulses  seek  a  new  outlet.  Two  direc- 
tions they  can  take:  they  can  go  around  back  by  way  of  the 
motor  nerve  that  stimulates  this  muscle,  and  so  stimulate  it 
again;  or  they  can  take  some  other  motor  nerve  leading  to  a 


422  CHARLES  H.   WOOLBERT 

quite  different  muscle.  The  former  of  these  processes  is  the 
circular  reflex,  the  latter,  when  carried  on  through  a  seriesj 
the  chain  reflex.  By  means  of  circular  and  chain  reflexes  in 
various  combinations  the  organism  has  within  itself  the 
machinery  for  carrying  on  activity,  for  a  while,  at  least, 
without  the  intervention  of  peripheral  stimulations.  Only  in 
this  way  can  the  continued  activity  of  involuntary  organic 
acts  be  accounted  for,  activities  like  heart-beat  and  breathing. 
In  this  way  also  is  given  a  satisfactory  account  of  the  mechan- 
ism of  such  activities  as  catatonia,  catalepsy,  emotional  com- 
plexes, fixed  ideation — in  fact,  repetitive  and  continuative 
actions  of  all  kinds. 

To  get  the  full  significance  of  these  circular  and  chain 
reflex  systems  in  the  coordination  and  superordination  of 
actions,  it  is  necessary  to  envisage  them  in  connection  with 
the  development  order  of  muscular  systems.  Systems  de- 
veloped early  in  the  life  of  the  organism  are  obviously  deter- 
mined strongly;  in  the  case  of  the  very  earliest,  heart-beat 
and  breathing,  no  stimulus  short  of  that  adequate  to  stop 
life  can  divert  them.  Moreover,  their  continued  activity  is 
but  little  dependent  upon  other  stimulation  than  that  pro- 
vided by  the  circular  reflexes  that  keep  them  regular;  at 
least  so  long  as  the  muscles  concerned  receive  nourishment 
from  the  blood.  Systems  developed  one  stage  later,  like 
those  involving  walking,  reaching,  turning  the  head,  have 
within  themselves  much  of  the  same  continuative  mechanism. 
Their  ability  to  function,  however,  they  have  gained  largely 
as  an  adjustment  from  the  successful  functioning  of  systems 
developed  earlier.  At  the  start  of  their  functioning  they  do 
not  possess  a  full  measure  of  self-determination;  they  are  of 
necessity  dependencies,  subject  to  the  caprice  of  superiors 
holding  power  by  a  rule  of  seniority.  Certain  things  they 
can  do  so  long  as  the  older  systems  go  about  their  business 
in  an  orderly  fashion;  certain  other  things,  under  the  same 
conditions,  they  are  not  privileged  to  attempt.  Thus  the 
use  of  the  eyes,  the  hands,  the  legs,  is  conditioned  very 
materially  by  the  regularity  of  the  beating  of  the  heart  and 
of  breathing.  Let,  once,  something  go  wrong  with  either  of 


A  BEHAyiORISTIC  ACCOUNT  OF  SLEEP 

these  older  activities,  and  the  organism  loses  complete  control, 
eventually,  of  hands,  legs,  eyes,  and  of  all  other  muscle 
systems.  Under  similar  circumstances  any  determinations 
that  are  ordinarily  well  established  give  way  to  a  recrudes- 
cence of  the  wildest  of  random  movement. 

Thus  the  muscle  systems  operate  in  a  kind  of  hierarchy, 
with  jurisdictions  fairly  distinct,  though  not  exclusive.  Most 
firmly  enthroned  of  all  are  the  primary  reflex  systems  con- 
trolling heart-beat,  flow  of  blood,  operation  of  vital  organs, 
and  breathing.  Next  come  those  developed  in  the  organism's 
earlier  days,  use  of  arms  and  legs,  back,  torso,  and  neck 
muscles;  later,  and  probably  overlapping  the  earlier  systems, 
muscles  of  the  eyes,  ears,  face,  and  head;  lastly — coincident 
with  the  development  of  speech — the  muscles  of  jaws,  lips, 
tongue,  and  throat.  Thus  consciousness  as  complexity  of 
muscle  systems  is  a  pyramid  with  the  organic  systems  at  the 
base  and  the  muscles  of  thinking,  reasoning,  and  speech  at  the 
top.  Or,  changing  the  figure,  it  is  a  hierarchy  with  the 
organic  systems  as  autocrats  and  the  other  systems  holding 
office  on  a  descending  scale  of  self-government,  dependent 
always  upon  the  commands  of  the  autocrats  ruling  by  virtue 
of  prior  possession  of  power. 

This  hierarchy  operates  to  provide  the  difference  between 
sleep  and  waking  consciousness.  Without  the  tension  of  head 
and  face  systems  there  is  not  complexity  enough  for  conscious- 
ness. So  vital  are  they  to  clear  cognition  that  they  are 
easily  confused  with  the  totality  of  consciousness;  remove 
them  altogether  from  the  systems  active  at  any  one  time,  and 
unconsciousness  occurs.  Yet  they  are  not  autonomous;  when 
fatigued  and  free  from  intense  peripheral  stimulation  they 
normally  yield  easily  to  the  relaxing  of  the  lower  systems  and 
go  out  of  function  along  with  them.  Any  condition  in  which 
they  refuse  to  stop  functioning  when  free  from  peripheral 
stimulation  or  when  fatigued,  and  when  the  lower  systems 
have  relaxed,  is  looked  upon  as  abnormal.  In  fact  psycho- 
pathic conditions  can  be  described  either  in  terms  of  an 
actual  lack  of  the  upper  systems,  or  in  terms  of  their  failure  to 
cooperate  with  the  activities  of  the  lower.  Sleep  is  accounted 


424  CHARLES  H.   WOOLBERT 

for  in  the  formula :  Remove  the  higher  systems  from  activity, 
and  consciousness  departs  altogether;  weaken  the  lower,  and 
consciousness  is  in  a  precarious  condition,  especially  if  the 
higher  systems  are  affected  by  fatigue.  When  the  lower 
systems  are  thrown  out  of  function,  the  higher  circular  reflexes 
either  stop  at  once  or,  in  abnormal  cases,  ultimately  wear 
themselves  out;  in  either  case  consciousness  breaks  up. 
Remove  the  lower  entirely,  and  death  is  instantaneous. 

A  prime  requisite  of  easy  and  deep  sleep  is  freedom  from 
stimulation  for  the  eye,  ear,  nose,  tongue,  and  parts  of  the 
skin  not  constantly  pressed  by  clothes;  forms  of  stimulation 
that  have  little  to  do  with  the  organic  systems.  Yet  sleep  is 
possible  even  in  the  face  of  such  stimulations;  but  only  in 
cases  where  great  fatigue  throws  lower  systems,  like  those  of 
leg  muscles,  back,  and  neck,  out  of  commission.  The  chief 
power  of  estopping  other  systems,  especially  under  conditions 
when  fatigue  is  present,  is  authoritatively  appointed  to  the 
organic  systems;  because  they  get  their  determination  at  a 
time  when  the  organism  is  in  its  most  plastic  state — in  its 
early  stages. 

Thus  sleep  becomes  behavioristically  a  matter  of  the 
efficient  domination  of  the  upper  systems  by  the  lower, 
operating  through  the  relaxing  power  of  fatigue;  while  wake- 
fulness  and  insomnia  always  imply  that  the  higher  and  later 
systems  are  assuming  dominance  over  their  precursors. 
Wakefulness,  so,  is  characteristically  the  dominance  of  the 
lower  systems  by  the  upper  when  fatigue  is  not  present. 
Accordingly  when  wakefulness  exists  at  the  same  time  that 
fatigue  is  present,  the  condition  is  abnormal. 

This  means  that  when  the  muscles  of  the  back,  legs,  and 
neck  are  relaxed,  a  powerful  stimulator  is  lost  to  the  muscles 
of  the  arms,  hands,  feet,  and  head.  When  arms,  hands,  feet, 
and  head  muscles  in  turn  are  relaxed,  there  is  lost  a  powerful 
source  of  stimulation  to  the  muscles  of  the  face,  jaw,  tongue, 
and  throat.  While  systems  are  undoubtedly  more  finely 
differentiated  than  this,  still  their  hierarchical  interdependence 
is  on  just  such  an  order — and  sleep  can  be  explained  by  gross 
characterizations  as  well  as  by  those  more  minute.  In  the 


A  BEHAFIORISTIC  ACCOUNT  OF  SLEEP 

inducing  of  sleep  much  significance  must  be  attached  to  the 
order  in  which  muscle  systems  go  out  of  function.  When  the 
organism  follows  the  development  sequence,  sleep  is  easy; 
when  the  order  of  relaxation  is  in  any  way  reversed,  restless- 
ness and  wakefulness  follow.  In  cases  of  complete  reversal 
of  the  order,  we  get  such  states  as  hypnosis,  temporary  high 
degress  of  attention,  manic  conditions,  and  forms  of  insanity. 

The  beginning  of  sleep  then  normally  is  the  relaxation  of 
the  muscles  that  hold  the  body  erect.  As  soon  as  these 
muscles  are  relaxed,  the  prime  determiner  of  higher  systems 
is  taken  away,  the  proprio-ceptor  foundation,  and  the  higher 
systems  then  are  kept  in  function  by  only  a  veritable  bom- 
bardment from  the  outside  world  or  from  very  strongly  deter- 
mined circular  or  chain  reflex  arcs  within  their  own  system. 
Among  these  latter  are  emotional  states,  fixed  ideas,  tunes 
running  through  the  head,  repeated  attempts  to  solve  a 
problem,  rhythmical  verbalizing,  and  thinking  in  circles. 

The  next  step  in  normal  sleep  is  the  sequential  relaxation 
of  each  of  the  systems  hierarchically  dependent  upon  the 
erect-holding  systems.  Finally  through  the  sufficient  dissolu- 
tion of  the  complexity  that  makes  consciousness,  sleep  comes. 
Consequently  once  a  person  lies  down,  relaxing  the  muscles 
of  legs,  back,  and  neck,  the  beginning  is  made  of  sleep. 
Providing  there  is  no  interference  from  outside  stimulations — 
chiefly  those  acting  upon  the  sense  endings  in  the  head — and 
also  so  long  as  there  is  no  intense  circular  reflex  process 
going  on  in  the  muscles  of  the  jaw,  lips,  tongue,  or  throat, — 
'thoughts  that  will  not  go  out  of  one's  head' —  such  a  be- 
ginning once  made  leads  to  complete  sleep  and  loss  of  con- 
sciousness. 

Certain  easily-made  empirical  observations  as  to  sleep 
confirm  this  account,  (i)  Sleep  is  characteristically  accom- 
panied by  relaxation  of  muscles.  (2)  Characteristically  also 
it  takes  place  with  the  body  in  a  horizontal  position,  a  position 
that  induces  first  of  all  a  relaxation  of  the  muscles  of  the  legs, 
back,  and  neck,  all  of  which  must  maintain  a  high  degree  of 
tonicity  to  maintain  erect  posture.  (3)  When  the  muscles 
of  the  back,  legs,  and  neck  are  relaxed,  the  muscles  of  the 


426  CHARLES  H.   WOOLBERT 

head,  face,  jaw,  and  throat  all  tend  to  relax  in  a  short  time 
ensuing.  (4)  These  muscles  also  are  most  easily  relaxed 
when  freed  from  stimulation  of  the  head  sense  endings,  in  the 
dark  and  in  silence  and  free  from  intense  taste  or  smell.  (5) 
All  these  relaxations  occur  parallel  with  a  scattering  of  con- 
sciousness, a  defocalizing  of  attention;  and  the  greater  the 
degree  of  relaxation,  the  less  the  ability  to  perform  any  act 
implying  a  high  degree  of  concentration.  (6)  Organic  activi- 
ties, though,  are  kept  up  despite  any  relaxation  of  the  volun- 
tary muscle  systems.  (7)  Again,  deep  sleep  implies  complete 
relaxation;  also  it  connotes  rest  and  recuperation  from 
fatigue,  a  retoning  of  muscles  for  future  work.  (8)  The 
degree  of  sleep  involved  conditions  the  number  and  vividness 
of  dreams  had;  deep  sleep  implying  few  dreams  and  light; 
light  sleep  implying  many  dreams  or  dreams  that  are  vivid. 
(9)  Deep  sleep  also  leaves  little  recollection  of  dreams,  except 
for  the  moment  when  one  is  coming  out  of  sleep  to  conscious- 
ness. (10)  Great  numbers  of  dreams,  or  dreams  that  are 
vivid,  it  is  generally  assumed,  are  equivalent  to  defective  rest, 
and  restlessness  is  always  accompanied  by  the  inability  to 
stop  thinking  or  by  numerous  and  intense  dreams,  (n) 
During  widespread  muscular  activity  there  is  no  such  thing 
as  sleep;  as  during  walking,  eating,  reading,  talking,  giving 
active  attention  in  any  way. 

These  general  observations,  and  many  others  of  similar 
nature,  point  clearly  to  the  close  relation  existing  between 
sleep  and  the  movement  or  tonicity  of  muscles. 

In  the  subjective  terms  of  ideation,  sensation,  and  feeling 
it  is  difficult  to  explain  what  happens  to  conceptual  thought 
during  sleep.  The  behaviorist,  by  assuming  that  thought 
of  all  kinds  and  in  all  degrees  is  a  matter  of  muscular  tonus, 
precisely  as  in  walking  or  standing  erect  or  moving  the  hands 
or  talking,  can  give  an  account  of  sleep  that  fits  in  with  his 
whole  program.  Sleep  to  him  is  nothing  but  a  disorganiza- 
tion of  muscle  systems  which  in  waking  consciousness  are 
closely  interrelated  hierarchically,  the  action  of  each  deter- 
mined in  part  by  the  continued  action  of  the  others.  When 
conditions  are  set  for  the  relaxation  of  sundry  systems  of 


A  BEUAyiORlSTIC  ACCOUNT  OF  SLEEP  427 

muscles,  consciousness  begins  to  be  more  scattered,  system 
after  system  drops  out  of  function,  and  ultimately,  in  the 
soundest  sleep,  nothing  is  left  by  way  of  muscular  activity 
but  the  functioning  of  the  organic  systems. 

Dreams  are  clearly  the  result  of  systems  involving  throat, 
face,  tongue,  and  lip  muscles  which  remain  in  function  when 
other  systems  have  been  thrown  out  of  gear,  systems  which,  if 
combined,  would  make  consciousness.  The  Freudian  dream 
psychology  presents  agreement  with  obvious  facts  in  that  it 
recognizes  the  existence  during  sleep  of  mental  processes 
which  seem  very  like  others  that  go  on  in  waking  conscious- 
ness, yet  which  at  the  same  time  are  partly  unlike  them. 
The  behavioristic  explanation  of  this  is  that  in  so  far  as  a 
dream  is  a  matter  of  the  activity  of  muscle  systems  involving 
a  high  degree  of  complexity  and  coordination,  in  so  far  it  is 
similar  to  waking  consciousness;  and  so  has  a  way  of  seeming 
logically  coherent.  The  illogical  dream,  on  the  other  hand, 
the  freakish  dream,  the  dream  that  seems  to  forbid  explana- 
tion and  interpretation,  can  be  explained  broadly  as  a  type 
of  organization  and  coordination  not  met  with  in  that  form 
in  waking  life;  so  that,  speaking  generally,  the  more  unusual 
the  combination  left  operative  during  sleep,  the  more  fan- 
tastic the  dream.  From  these  suppositions  can  also  be  found 
the  reason  why  dream  analysis  cannot  be  a  matter  of  accurate 
interpretation  and  why  the  Freudians  who  assume  to  inter- 
pret all  dreams  give  promises  in  reality  beyond  powers  of 
observation  to  fulfill.  So  entirely  beyond  inspection  and 
prediction  can  be  the  permutations  and  combinations  of  the 
hierarchy  of  muscle  systems,  that  they  can  defy  all  powers 
of  analysis. 

From  these  observations  follow  certain  therapeutic  in- 
ferences worthy  of  note,  most  of  them  current  already  through 
the  experience  of  the  race.  If  you  would  sleep  soundly,  exer- 
cise much,  in  particular  the  muscle  systems  of  the  body  below 
the  head;  for  if  the  'body'  is  tired,  the  'mind'  will  rest  also. 
If  restless  in  sleep,  study  how  to  relax,  first  of  all  the  muscles 
of  the  legs,  back,  and  neck.  Then  reduce  the  breathing  rate: 
high  tension  almost  invariably  is  accompanied  by  rapid  breath- 


428  CHARLES  H.   WOOLBERT 

ing;  low  tension  by  slow-breathing.  Also  hands  and  feet, 
fingers  and  toes,  must  be  inert.  If  thoughts  crowd  thick 
and  fast  and  will  not  leave,  let  the  jaw  drop,  make  the 
muscles  of  the  cheeks  and  lips  flabby,  avoid  screwing  up 
the  muscles  around  the  forehead  and  the  eyes,  see  that  the 
tongue  lies  limp  in  the  mouth,  and  make  certain  that  the 
muscles  of  the  throat  are  not  in  any  way  tensed.  These 
last-named  muscles,  together  with  those  of  the  jaw,  tongue, 
and  lips,  are  more  likely  than  any  other  to  get  in  the  way  of 
sound  sleep.  Make  sure  to  observe  the  right  order  of  relaxa- 
tion of  systems;  gross  lower  systems  first,  then  the  finer  sys- 
tems below  the  head,  and  finally  the  fine  systems  of  the  head. 
Sleep  is  synonymous  with  carrying  out  the  following  order 
in  relaxation:  Reduce  the  breathing  rate;  then  relax  legs, 
back,  abdomen,  and  neck;  then  arms,  hands,  fingers,  and 
toes;  next  the  muscles  around  the  eyes,  forehead,  scalp,  and 
ears;  and  finally  those  around  the  mouth,  jaws,  tongue,  and 
throat — the  muscles  of  speech  and  conceptual  thought. 


THE   COMPENSATORY  FUNCTION  OF 
MAKE-BELIEVE  PLAY 

BY  EDWARD  S.  ROBINSON 
The  University  of  Chicago 

It  is  the  purpose  of  this  paper  to  present  in  outline  a  view 
of  play  which  will  usefully  supplement  those  theories  which 
are  generally  entertained.  Play  is,  of  course,  a  phenomenon 
of  extreme  complexity  and,  for  that  reason,  its  complete 
explanation  should  hardly  be  looked  for  in  any  single  state- 
ment. The  suggestions  have  been  made  that  the  play  of 
children  is  a  chronicle  of  race  activities,  that  it  gives  practice 
or  preparation  in  functions  of  coming  importance,  that  it 
furnishes  an  outlet  for  surplus  energy,  and  that  it  is  a  recrea- 
tional agency  or  means  of  relief  from  fatigue  induced  by  other 
occupations.1  Undoubtedly  all  of  these  things  are  true  to 
some  extent,  but  more  important  than  any  of  them  is  the  fact 
that  play  is  essentially  a  compensatory  mechanism  having 
the  same  origin  and  impetus  as  the  day-dream  or  fantasy.2 

A  compensatory  function  is  especially  evident  in  that  type 
of  play  which  involves  the  element  of  conscious  shamming  or 
make-believe.  While  it  is  possible  to  demonstrate  that  other 
types  of  play  may  operate  as  compensation,3 1  shall  confine  the 
following  discussion  to  play  which  is  clearly  make-believe 
in  character. 

The  child  is  driven  by  many  inherited  and  acquired  im- 
pulses, some  of  which  are  adequately  and  easily  expressed 
and  some  of  which  find  no  direct  outlet.  These  latter  create 
a  situation  demanding  compensation,  and  this  compensation 

1  For  one  of  the  latest  discussions  of  the  various  theories  of  play  see  Reaney,  M.  J., 
'The  Psychology  of  the  Organized  Group  Game,'  Brit.  J.  of  Psychol.,  Monog.  Supple- 
ment, 1916,  IV. 

*  The  compensatory  nature  of  the  day-dream  or  fantasy  is  clearly  brought  out  by 
Freud  and  other  writers  of  the  psychoanalytic  school. 

1  Dr.  Reaney,  for  example,  holds  that  organized  group  games  may  have  a  com- 
pensatory function.  Op.  cit. 

429 


430  EDWARD  S.  ROBINSON 

is  as  a  rule  secured  through  make-believe  activities.  Most 
common  among  such  activities  are  play  and  fantasy.  A  child 
would  fight,  hunt,  and  make  a  home  as  particular  stimuli 
arouse  him.  He  is  seldom  in  such  an  environment,  however, 
and  he  is  practically  never  so  organized  by  inheritance  or 
training  that  these  undertakings  can  be  fully  carried  out. 
There  are  inexhaustible  inhibitors  around  him  and  within 
him  which  check  free  expression.  And  so  he  plays  at,  or 
has  day-dreams  of,  fighting,  hunting,  and  home-making.  I 
have  no  desire  at  this  time  to  say  which  of  the  unsatisfied 
impulses  of  childhood  are  inherited  and  which  acquired;  but, 
however  they  arise,  we  find  that  they  are  many  and  urgent, 
and  consequently  that  every  normal  child  must  find  com- 
pensation for  their  inhibition. 

There  are  a  number  of  factors  which  may  act  as  inhibitors 
of  the  behavior  tendencies  of  children.  These  may  con- 
veniently be  divided  into  the  extra-organic  and  the  intra- 
organic,  according  to  whether  they  are  in  the  nature  of  en- 
vironmental interferences  or  interferences  which  arise  out  of 
the  child's  own  organism. 

During  his  development  the  child  is  constantly  running 
into  extra-organic  or  environmental  facts  which  are  incom- 
patible with  the  satisfaction  of  his  desires.  He  may  want  to 
hunt.  Perhaps  the  family  cat  supplies  him  with  a  stimulus 
to  make  this  impulse  felt.  But  this  hunting  impulse  has 
become  a  particularized  affair.  Hunting  is  shooting,  and 
he  can  not  shoot  because  he  has  no  gun.  Instead  of  ignoring 
a  stimulus  to  which  he  can  not  react  adequately,  he  points  a 
stick  at  the  cat  and  shouts  'Boom!'  He  may  then,  and 
perhaps  to  his  sorrow,  try  to  drag  in  his  'dead'  game  by  the 
hind  legs.  But  the  main  and  incontestable  point  is  that  the 
child  is  compensating,  by  means  of  his  pretensions,  for  the 
inadequacies  of  the  situation.  He  would  like  only  too  well 
to  shoot  a  real  gun  and  drag  in  game  which  is  really  dead, 
but  his  environment  does  not  supply  the  appropriate  circum- 
stances. And  so  he  plays. 

Among  the  more  important  extra-organic  factors  which 
limit  the  child's  expression  are  the  people  around  him.  Just 


COMPENSATORY  FUNCTION  OF  MAKE-EELIEVE  PLAY      43* 

as  he  discovers  the  splendid  interior  of  his  father's  watch, 
someone  takes  the  watch  away  from  him.  Just  as  he  dis- 
covers the  importance  of  certain  corners  of  the  pantry,  some- 
one carries  him  away  to  another  room.  Everywhere  there 
are  people  and  they  are  constantly  interfering  with  his 
behavior. 

As  I  have  intimated,  it  is  not  only  the  lack  of  a  physical 
world  fitting  in  with  every  whim  which  causes  the  child  to 
play  rather  than  to  act  in  earnest.  He  has  also  his  intra- 
organic  interferences  arising  out  of  his  own  complex  little 
nature.  For  the  pure  joy  of  it  he  would,  at  times,  like  to 
bring  down  a  stout  club  upon  the  head  of  his  playmate — 
that  is,  he  would  like  to  do  this  if  it  were  not  for  the  dis- 
concerting facts  that  he  would  not  like  to  hear  his  playmate 
cry  in  pain,  and  that  he  would  not  like  to  feel  the  blows  of  his 
playmate's  revenge.  And  so  the  two  boys  will  play  at 
fighting.  Often,  too,  a  child  is  hindered  from  acting  as  he 
would  because  of  a  realization  of  the  smallness  of  his  body 
and  the  slightness  of  his  muscular  strength.  In  such  cases 
we  are  apt  to  have  a  mimicry  of  feats  of  strength  and  daring. 

It  is  evident  that  there  are  instances  of  make-believe  play 
and  fantasy  which  apparently,  at  least,  are  not  primarily 
compensatory.  A  child  may  straddle  his  hobby-horse,  not 
because  it  is  the  best  substitute  for  a  real  horse  he  would  ride, 
but  simply  because  he  has  been  taught  to  do  so  by  his  parents. 
There  is  little  doubt,  however,  but  that  the  average  child 
enjoys  his  playing  the  more  where  he  perceives  its  symbolic 
relationship  to  a  more  serious  pursuit.  The  fact  that  chil- 
dren's play  is  given  much  of  its  specific  form  by  adults,  does 
not,  in  the  last  analysis,  indicate  that  it  is  therefore  less 
compensatory.  By  custom  and  tradition  we  initiate  various 
make-believe  performances  for  children,  but  something  in 
the  nature  of  childhood  must  explain  why  children  take  to 
the  make-believe  with  such  enthusiasm.  When  we  first  teach 
a  child  to  ride  a  hobby-horse  he  may  be  unaware  of  any 
connection  between  this  activity  and  the  actualities  of  horse- 
back riding.  But  as  he  learns  about  real  horses  and  real 
riding,  his  play  will  become  more  and  more  clearly  com- 


432  EDWARD  S.  ROBINSON 

pensatory  in  function.  In  other  words,  the  rise  of  certain 
impulses  in  children  is  so  inevitable  that  their  compensatory 
expression  may  be  provided  for  by  the  customs  of  the  race. 
In  the  case  of  any  one  child  a  compensatory  activity  may  be 
set  up  before  the  need  for  that  particular  compensation  arises, 
but  we  may  still  consider  the  activity  a  typical  product  of 
child  life  and  its  characteristically  incomplete  adjustment. 

Just  as  in  certain  individual  cases  a  compensatory  make- 
believe  may  arise  before  the  need  for  that  particular  com- 
pensation, so  specific  habits  of  play  and  fantasy  may  be 
retained  after  the  apparent  need  for  their  compensatory 
service  is  past.  I  know  of  successful  men  who  find  great 
pleasure  in  day-dreams  of  achievements  which  they  would  not 
care  to  have  realized  in  any  tangible  fashion.  In  some  of 
these  cases  the  day-dreams  express  real  desires  which  are 
denied  direct  expression  because  they  run  counter  to  other 
desires  of  a  more  powerful  sort.  In  other  cases,  however, 
it  is  quite  possible  that  day  dreams  which  once  had  a  com- 
pensatory function  now  operate  as  old  habits  and  are  retained 
because  of  their  own  repetition  rather  than  because  of  any 
important  compensation  which  they  still  render. 

Play  and  fantasy  are  frequently  concerned  with  situations 
more  painful  and  disagreeable  than  any  we  should  choose 
to  meet  in  real  life.  A  natural  question  arises  as  to  the  sense 
in  which  such  make-believe  can  be  considered  compensatory. 
Children  do  not  want  to  be  in  railroad  wrecks  nor  to  receive 
bullet  wounds,  and  yet  they  enjoy  pretending  they  are  in 
such  straits.  So  it  appears  on  first  thought,  but,  as  a  matter 
of  fact,  children  do  wish  that  just  such  things  would  happen 
to  them,  providing  they  might  happen  without  pain  or  other 
ill  consequences.  In  regard  to  railroad  wrecks,  if  we  could 
read  a  child's  impulsive  nature  completely,  we  should  prob- 
ably find  that  he  wishes  he  could  be  in  a  wreck  and,  at  the 
same  time,  hopes  he  will  not.  He  is  in  the  same  predicament 
as  the  boy  who  would  like  to  club  his  companion  and  yet 
would  not  like  to.  And  like  that  boy  he  compensates  for 
his  conflict  by  playing.  In  other  words  there  are  few,  if  any, 
situations  in  life  which  appeal  to  us  in  a  purely  negative  way. 


COMPENSATORY  FUNCTION  OF  MAKE-BELIEVE  PLAY       433 

We  do  not,  as  a  rule,  want  to  suffer  great  misfortunes;  yet 
there  are  certain  factors,  such  as  affectionate  demonstrations 
on  the  part  of  our  friends,  the  joy  of  being  in  the  public  eye, 
and  the  like,  which  give  the  majority  of  unfortunate  circum- 
stances a  considerable  amount  of  positive  appeal. 

Distinctly  unpleasant  play  and  fantasy  may  also  provide 
for  the  compensatory  expression  of  negative  impulses.  There 
is  little  reason  to  believe  that  fears,  for  example,  do  not 
require  expression  of  some  sort  as  urgently  as  more  positive 
tendencies.  Playing,  day-dreaming  and  the  telling  of  stones 
involving  ghosts  and  goblins  may  well  serve  to  express  fears 
which  must  be  inhibited  in  the  world  of  actuality. 

Holding  the  older  view  that  childhood  is  a  period  of 
happiness  and  serenity,  one  could  hardly  accept  an  explana- 
tion of  play  in  terms  of  compensation  for  incomplete  or  faulty 
adjustment — in  terms  of  the  partial  resolution  of  conflicts 
between  the  child  and  his  environment  or  between  contra- 
dictory factors  within  his  own  character.  I  believe,  however, 
that  there  is  little  need  to  argue  against  that  older  view. 
Childhood  is  primarily  a  period  of  incomplete  adjustment, 
and  we  remember  it  as  peaceful  because  we  have  forgotten 
its  sorrows  and  because  problems  of  great  consequence  to  us 
in  childhood  mean  little  to  us  now.  Full  of  impulses  to  do 
actual  things,  the  child  is  equipped  with  a  physique  and 
surrounded  by  an  environment  which  are  constant  obstacles. 
I  do  not  believe,  like  some,  that  it  is  desirable,  if  possible,  to 
remove  these  obstacles  and  make  childhood  a  comparatively 
easy  and  comfortable  state.  Human  life  requires,  and  gets 
much  of  its  value  from,  an  abundance  of  nice  adjustments 
which  can  come  only  as  the  result  of  long  and  necessarily 
arduous  training.  The  child  comes  into  the  world  with  an 
inherited  behavior  equipment,  but  at  best  this  equipment  is 
an  uncertain  affair.  Each  impulse  tends  to  operate  in  in- 
appropriate as  well  as  in  appropriate  situations.  Each  im- 
pulse, if  the  child  is  to  become  prepared  for  adult  life,  must 
be  defined,  and  definition  implies  inhibition.  The  child  must 
live  through  a  period  of  paradoxes  before  he  can  become  an 
individual  of  discrimination.  If  he  were  a  perfect  mechanism 


434  EDWARD  S.  ROBINSON 

and  if  educational  stimuli  were  perfectly  coordinated,  it  is 
possible  that  he  might  be  trained  without  being  constantly 
thrown  out  of  adjustment.  Then,  too,  if  the  life  for  which 
society  prepares  him  were  more  simple  in  its  requirements,  he 
might  be  spared  some  maladjustment.  But  the  human 
organism  is  not  perfect,  and,  while  educational  practice 
improves  from  time  to  time,  the  world  rushes  forward  into 
new  complexities.  One  who  has  any  faith  in  the  present 
direction  of  progress  can  hardly  do  other  than  accept  the 
essentially  incomplete  adjustment  of  the  young  as  a  necessary 
product  of  that  progress.  The  happy  fact  is  that  the  con- 
flicts of  youth  can  be  so  adequately  compensated  for  by  the 
play  and  fantasy  mechanisms. 

While  they  are  fundamentally  natural  and  necessary  phe- 
nomena of  child  life,  play  and  fantasy  can  result  in  patho- 
logical as  well  as  in  normal  compensations.  And  as  normal 
compensations  the  forms  which  they  take  may  modify  the 
development  of  character  to  a  marked  degree.  For  these 
reasons  their  exhaustive  study,  as  but  different  manifesta- 
tions of  a  single  process,  is  essential.  Indeed  it  seems  to  me 
that  few  fields  may  be  more  profitably  explored  either  by 
those  interested  in  child  life  in  general  or  by  those  interested 
in  some  particular  child.  From  this  compensation  process, 
studied  for  what  it  really  is,  we  may  hope  to  gain  some  new 
and  useful  knowledge  about  the  stresses  and  strains  of  human 
development. 

Still,  even  at  the  present  time,  it  is  possible  to  point  out 
some  of  the  principles  which  operate  in  the  compensatory 
behavior  of  children. 

The  distinction  between  play  and  fantasy  is,  of  course,  a 
distinction  between  overt  and  ideational  behavior.  Play, 
in  so  far  as  it  is  pretending,  is  never  without  an  element  of 
fantasy,  but  we  may  arbitrarily  confine  the  application  of  the 
latter  term  to  those  forms  of  pretending  which  are  lacking 
in  overt  bodily  accompaniments.  It  will  then  be  possible  to 
distinguish  between  these  two  types  of  compensation  and  to 
note  their  interrelations. 

Although  we  cannot  be  certain  of  it,  play  probably  pre- 


COMPENSATORY  FUNCTION  OF  MAKE-BELIEVE  PLAY      435 

cedes  fantasy  in  the  child's  life.  The  latter  does  appear 
quite  early,  however,  in  some  children  at  least,  and  before 
the  school  age  is  reached  both  are  clearly  present.  I  re- 
member the  interesting  evidence  for  the  early  rise  of  fantasy 
given  to  me  by  a  little  girl  of  not  more  than  four,  who  said, 
placing  her  two  chubby  hands  before  her  face,  "Let's  shut 
our  eyes  and  play  we're  at  Gran'ma's." 

In  play  and  fantasy  there  are  two  factors,  which  may  or 
may  not  be  consciously  recognized  by  the  child,  determining 
to  a  large  extent  the  nature  of  his  pretending  activities. 
In  the  first  place,  there  is  a  tendency  toward  breadth  and 
freedom  of  expression.  The  child  must  express  impulses 
which  are  often  clearly  incongruous  with  his  world  of  actual- 
ity, and  the  greater  this  incongruity  the  more  lively  will  be 
the  flights  of  imagination  to  which  they  give  rise  and  the 
more  apt  will  the  child  be  to  engage  in  private  fantasy 
rather  than  in  overt  play.  In  the  second  place,  the  satis- 
faction which  is  derived  from  compensatory  behavior  depends 
to  some  extent  upon  its  being  within  the  limits  of  the  child's 
own  credulity.  The  impulses  which  drive  the  child  are  aimed 
at  an  actual  world,  and  their  indirect  expression  itself  must 
not  get  too  far  beyond  the  realms  of  that  actuality.  Thus, 
we  may  think  of  these  two  main  determinants  of  play  and 
fantasy  as  (i)  the  child's  natural  tendency  toward  free  expres- 
sion, and  (2)  his  need  for  a  certain  credibility  in  experience. 

The  tendency  toward  free  expression  leads  to  the  estab- 
lishment of  all  sorts  of  fictitious  characters  and  objects  within 
the  playground.  Toys  and  playmates  which  do  not  fit  in 
with  the  completer,  fancied  world  may  be  put  aside.  I 
remember  that  even  up  to  the  age  of  sixteen  I  frequently 
judged  congeniality  in  terms  of  the  readiness  of  others  to 
disregard  reality  in  favor  of  a  world  of  pretty  definite  and 
well  defined  fancy.  I  always  preferred  to  knock  grounders 
with  one  particular  lad  because  he  cooperated  so  well  in  con- 
verting the  procedure  into  the  pretensions  of  a  big  league 
game.  The  same  was  true  in  boxing.  Having  read  and 
memorized  the  details  of  most  of  the  historic  ring  battles,  we 
repeated  many  of  these  almost  blow  for  blow  upon  the  floor 


436  EDWARD  S.  ROBINSON 

of  my  mother's  laundry.  And  many  were  the  Harvard-Yale 
football  games  in  which  I  engaged  with  one  other  actual 
player,  both  of  us,  as  often  as  not,  playing  on  the  same  side. 
In  cases  of  this  sort,  the  meaning  of  ordinary  play  activity 
is  widened  by  the  liberal  use  of  fantasy. 

In  the  course  of  an  individual's  development  many  im- 
pulses arise  which  can  not  be  expressed  to  any  satisfactory 
extent  in  a  cooperative  fashion.  Often  a  child  is  afraid  of 
being  laughed  at  for  the  world  he  would  live  in.  Under  such 
circumstances  there  may  be  a  withdrawal  from  play  to  pure 
fantasy  with  its  wider  possibilities  for  pretending.  Indeed, 
one  of  the  signs  of  coming  adulthood  is  the  giving  up  of 
overt  play  and  the  switching  over  to  compensatory  behavior 
of  a  more  private  sort.  Adults  seldom  play  in  the  childhood 
sense  of  that  term,  unless  it  be  in  art.  In  the  adult,  com- 
pensations through  pretending  are  more  likely  to  be  worked 
out  in  private  day-dreams.  The  fact  remains,  however,  that 
less  compensation  of  any  kind  is  necessary  in  the  general 
run  of  adult  lives,  so  that  we  may  safely  assume  that  fantasy 
as  well  as  play  is  more  common  during  childhood. 

Along  with  this  tendency  toward  free  expression,  we  have 
a  tendency  to  make  that  expression  as  realistic  as  possible. 
Children  are  constantly  recognizing  inconsistencies  in  their 
play  life  and  trying  to  patch  them  over  as  best  they  can. 
When,  as  a  very  small  boy,  I  played  with  tin  soldiers  and 
miniature  locomotives,  I  always  felt  the  inappropriateness 
of  the  size  of  my  own  body.  The  device  which  I  hit  upon  to 
get  around  this  difficulty  I  called  Playing  You  Are  Nothing. 
Every  playfellow  who  entered  into  the  world  of  my  tiny 
armies  and  railroads  was  introduced  to  the  proposition  of 
suspending  all  interest  in  his  own  body.  The  running  of  the 
trains  and  the  marching  of  the  troops  were  to  be  considered 
as  events  independent  of  ourselves.  There  was  one  youngster 
who  could  not  push  a  locomotive  across  the  floor  without 
playing  he  was  the  engineer.  His  fate  was  obvious.  I  never 
invited  him  to  play  unless  I  could  get  no  one  else;  and,  when 
he  did  come,  it  was  to  be  made  miserable  by  my  constant 
insistence  that  he  must  play  he  was  nothing.  Our  dis- 


COMPENSATORY  FUNCTION  OF  MAKE-BELIEVE  PLAY      437 

agreement,  of  course,  grew  out  of  the  fact  that  each  of  us  in 
his  own  way  was  striving  to  give  the  play  a  more  vivid 
atmosphere  of  reality. 

Just  as  overt  play  often  passes  over  into  private  fantasy 
owing  to  a  struggle  against  the  limitations  of  the  actual  social 
and  physical  world,  so  private  fantasy  often  passes  over  into 
overt  play  in  the  interests  of  greater  credibility.  As  a  child 
I  was  full  of  baseball  fantasies.  Although  I  played  baseball 
a  great  deal,  these  games  did  not  satisfy  certain  standards 
set  up  by  reading  athletic  stories  and  watching  older  and  more 
skillful  players.  But  the  fantasies,  too,  often  became  un- 
satisfactory on  account  of  their  intangibility.  As  a  result  I 
formed  the  habit  of  laying  out  a  diamond  upon  the  lawn  and 
there,  without  ball  or  playmates,  carrying  out  the  overt 
movements  of  an  heroic  baseball  performance.  Many  a  time, 
I  pitched  nine  long  innings  to  baffled  athletes  who  swung 
immaterial  bats  at  my  imaginary  curves.  Here  was  fantasy 
improved  and  made  realistic  by  the  actuality  of  its  muscular 
accompaniments. 

The  topics  of  private  fantasy  are  perhaps  even  more  apt 
to  find  increased  tangibility  by  being  brought  into  contact 
with  a  real  social  world.  The  child  knows  that  his  day- 
dreams are  unreal,  but  the  insistence  of  that  fact  becomes 
less  troublesome  if  only  he  can  get  some  one  else  to  believe 
or  act  as  though  he  believes  in  the  reality  of  those  imagined 
events.  Many  of  the  lies  of  children  arise  out  of  such  circum- 
stances. A  boy  longs  for  a  pony  and  a  box  of  tools.  He 
fancies  these  things  in  his  possession,  and  before  a  great  while 
he  somehow  feels  driven  to  tell  his  friends  either  that  he 
already  has  the  things  he  desires  or  that  he  has  been  promised 
them.  An  acquaintance  of  mine  spent  her  earliest  years  on 
a  farm  which  was  more  or  less  out  of  touch  with  the  livelier 
affairs  of  the  world.  Now  it  so  happened  that  an  older  sister 
in  this  household  was  sent  to  town  to  finish  her  education. 
Upon  her  return  she  had  much  to  say  of  her  experiences. 
These  tales  thrilled  the  younger  sister  and  stimulated  her  to 
day-dreaming.  Soon  after  this  the  little  girl  began  her  own 
education  at  a  neighboring  country  school.  As  she  tells  of 


438  EDWARD  S.  ROBINSON 

it  now,  almost  her  first  intercourse  with  her  school  mates 
was  marked  by  her  own  spectacular  reports  of  what  she 
had  seen  and  heard  while  sojourning  in  the  town  which  really 
she  had  never  been  near. 

It  is  interesting  to  note  here  that  the  literary  make-believe 
of  adults  contains  within  it  evidence  of  the  tendencies  toward 
free  expression  and  credibility,  which  I  have  mentioned  as 
such  significant  factors  in  child  life.  Written  fiction,  for 
example,  may  be  thought  of  as  an  instrument  for  free  expres- 
sion and  the  spoken  drama  as  an  instrument  for  giving  human 
fancies  increased  tangibility.  It  is  hardly  necessary  to  point 
out  the  importance  of  artistic  appreciation  and  production  for 
the  compensatory  life  of  children. 

This  view  of  play  as  a  compensatory  mechanism  does  not 
pretend  to  refute  the  more  familiar  theories  which,  by  the 
way,  were  not  formulated  with  special  reference  to  the  make- 
believe.  That  theory  which  describes  play  as  a  recapitula- 
tion phenomenon  simply  states  that  the  primary  impulses 
expressed  in  play  appear  more  or  less  spontaneously  at  set 
periods  in  the  child's  life,  and  that  the  child's  activities  during 
successive  periods  of  his  life  are  definitely  reminiscent  of  the 
typical  periods  of  racial  development.  Most  of  us  would 
probably  admit  that  there  is  a  rough  similarity  between 
individual  and  racial  development.  But  the  view  that  play 
is  a  compensatory  activity  demands  neither  the  acceptance 
nor  the  rejection  of  this  theory.  One  need  not  know  nor 
try  to  guess  the  exact  origin  and  analogies  of  a  child's  im- 
pulses to  realize  their  variety  and  the  conflicts  among  them 
which  demand  the  compensatory  service  of  the  make-believe. 

The  theory  that  play  prepares  a  child  for  later  life,  if 
broadly  enough"  interpreted,  fits  in  quite  well  with  the  notion 
which  has  been  developed  here.  Many  impulses  arise  during 
childhood  which,  while  they  can  not  be  directly  expressed  at 
that  time,  still  demand  preservation.  A  boy  may  be  inter- 
ested in  machinery.  If  he  is  permitted  or  even  encouraged 
in  his  play  and  fantasy  to  concern  himself  with  machines,  a 
very  useful  interest  may  be  preserved  for  the  time  when  it 
can  find  adequate  expression.  If  it  were  not  for  compensatory 
expression  through  play  and  fantasy,  it  is  quite  conceivable 


COMPENSATORY  FUNCTION  OF  MAKE-BELIEVE  PLAY      439 

that  many  such  early  rising  interests  or  impulses  would  suffer 
repression  and  thus  be  lost  as  far  as  useful  functioning  is 
concerned. 

The  theory  that  play  furnishes  an  outlet  for  surplus 
energy  is  somewhat  vague,  but  as  far  as  it  goes  it  meets  with 
no  contradiction  from  the  conception  that  play  is  compensa- 
tory in  function. 

Much  the  same  may  be  said  for  the  recreational  theory, 
which  really  finds  some  little  support  in  the  type  of  facts 
which  I  have  been  presenting.  A  boredom  which  longs  for 
some  impossible  or  impractical  distraction  is  often  indirectly 
relieved  by  a  compensatory  make-believe.  The  school  boy, 
tired  of  his  lessons  but  afraid  to  dash  from  the  class  room, 
may  partially  satisfy  himself  with  a  fantasy  of  the  swimming 
hole.  The  worried  business  man,  whose  unused  muscles 
would  not  tolerate  exertion,  may  yearn  to  play  ball  and 
take  his  yearning  out  in  fantasy. 

In  conclusion,  play,  the  more  private  forms  of  fantasy, 
much  lying  and  story  telling,  and  the  appreciation  of  stories 
all  serve  the  same  fundamental  purpose  in  human  life.  They 
are  compensatory  mechanisms.  They  are  more  typical  of 
children  than  of  adults,  because  it  is  in  children  that  the  most 
incongruity  exists  between  different  impulses  and  between 
impulses  and  the  surrounding  world  of  actuality.  The  nature 
of  play  and  the  other  compensatory  mechanisms  is  deter- 
mined by  the  need  of  imperfectly  adjusted  organisms  to 
express  their  impulses  as  freely  as  possible  without  too  greatly 
straining  the  possibilities  of  their  own  belief. 

It  is  essential,  if  not  self-evident,  that  play  should  not  be 
thought  of  as  behavior  which  is  usually  undesirable  or  patho- 
logical simply  because  its  function  is  compensatory.  Neither 
should  we  think  that,  because  play  grows  out  of  imperfect 
adjustment,  we  should  strive  for  a  world  in  which  play  is 
unnecessary.  Simpler  organisms  than  ourselves  get  com- 
pensation through  play.  The  ancients  in  a  comparatively 
simple  civilization  got  compensation  through  play.  And  in 
all  likelihood  the  further  humanity  advances  upon  its  present 
path  of  progress,  the  more  important  will  be  play  and  its 
related  phenomena,  especially  for  the  young  of  the  species. 


THE  CONTROL  OF  ATTITUDE  IN  PSYCHO- 
PHYSICAL  EXPERIMENTS 

BY  EDWIN  G.  BORING 

Clark  University 

Dr.  Godfrey  Thomson  has  recently  published  some  very 
illuminating  discussions  of  the  mathematical  logic  of  psycho- 
physics,  and  I  for  one  feel  myself  too  much  in  his  debt  to 
to  indulge  in  the  mere  picking  of  flaws.  Nevertheless  his 
paper,  'A  New  Point  of  View  in  the  Interpretation  of  Thresh- 
old Measurements  in  Psychophysics,' l  gives  me  concern 
because  it  seems  to  cast  aspersions  upon  what  I  have  regarded 
as  the  most  promising  direction  of  development  in  psycho- 
physics.  It  is  true  that  Dr.  Thomson's  'offences'  are  implied 
rather  than  actual  and  that  ultimately  I  may  discover  him 
in  agreement  with  my  thesis;  nevertheless  his  article  furnishes 
a  reason  for  placing  the  point  of  view  that  I  have  in  mind 
squarely  before  psychologists.  I  may  add  that  I  conceive 
that  I  am  merely  explicating  an  idea  that  arose  within  the 
Cornell  Laboratory.  If  there  be  any  credit  for  its  origin  it 
is  due  Cornell,  though  the  responsibility  of  the  present 
exposition  is  mine. 

Dr.  Thomson's  suggestion  is  as  follows:  In  the  test  of 
Weber's  law  (he  is  thinking  of  lifted  weights  as  the  example) 
we  may  take  the  differential  threshold,  which  is  half  the 
distance  between  the  upper  and  lower  limens  (i.e.,  half  the 
'interval  of  uncertainty'),  as  the  measure  of  sensitivity; 
and  such  has  teen  the  usual  practice.  Dr.  Thomson,  how- 
ever, prefers  to  take  as  a  measure  of  sensitivity  the  inter- 
quartile range  of  the  point  of  subjective  equality.  The 
threshold  is  proportional  to  the  distance  between  the  two 
points  where  the  psychometric  functions  for  'greater'  and 
for  'less'  cross  the  50  per  cent,  abscissa,  and  its  amount 

1  Godfrey  H.  Thomson,  'A  New  Point  of  View  in  the  Interpretation  of  Threshold 
Measurements  in  Psychophysics,'  PSYCHOL.  REV.,  1920,  27,  300-307. 
440 


THE  CONTROL  OF  ATTITUDE  44 1 

depends  upon  the  number  of  judgments  that  fall  within  the 
third  category  of  *  undecided'  judgments  (as  Dr.  Thomson 
styles  them)  or  'equal'  judgments.  Dr.  Thomson  would 
take  these  'undecided'  judgments  and  divide  them  equally 
for  every  stimulus  value  between  the  'greater'  and  'less' 
categories,  thus  establishing  two  new  psychometric  functions 
(instead  of  the  original  three)  which  of  necessity  will  inter- 
sect upon  the  50  per  cent,  abscissa  and  give  zero  limens.  The 
interquartile  range  is  the  distance  between  the  two  points  of 
intersection  of  these  new  psychometric  functions  with  the  75 
per  cent,  abscissa.  It  is  independent  of  the  'undecided' 
judgments  and  dependent  upon  the  measure  of  precision  (K) 
of  the  psychometric  functions,  since  the  steeper  the  curves 
the  less  the  interquartile  range,  and  vice  versa. 

Dr.  Thomson's  preference  for  the  interquartile  range  as  a 
measure  of  sensitivity  lies  in  his  distrust  of  the  relative 
frequencies  of  the  'undecided'  judgments  upon  which  the 
threshold  depends.  The  threshold,  he  writes,  'depends  en- 
tirely upon  the  subject's  readiness  to  give  the  answer  un- 
decided. It  measures  therefore  rather  a  moral  character  than 
a  physical  sensitivity.'  'The  moral  character  of  the  measure 
S  —  S'  is  above  all  seen  from  the  fact  that  any  subject  who 
wishes  may  reduce  it  to  zero,  whatever  may  be  his  actual 
sensitivity,  simply  by  determining  that  he  will  never  give 
an  answer  undecided.'  Thus  the  interquartile  range  'is  more 
physiological  than  the  threshold  measure.'  The  threshold  is 
to  be  mistrusted  because  'the  decision  as  to  what  proportion 
.  .  .  is  to  be  called  heavier,  what  undecided  and  what  lighter 
depends  upon  a  conscious  act  of  the  subject,  and  can  be 
varied,  if  he  be  so  disposed,  at  his  whim;  and  will  vary  with 
his  mood  at  the  moment.'  It  is  such  a  designation  of  things 
constant  and  measurable  as  'physiological'  and  of  things 
inconstant  and  uncontrolled  as  'moral'  or  psychological  that 
moves  a  psychologist  to  reply. 

It  is  not  my  present  purpose  to  inquire  how  much  of 
Dr.  Thomson's  argument  is  actually  new.  Fechner  wished 
to  measure  Unterschiedsempfindlichkeit  by  h  and  divided  his 


442  EDWIN  G.  BORING 

zzveifelhafte  cases  between  the  'greater'  and  'less'  categories.1 
G.  E.  Miiller  opposed  Fechner,  arguing  that  the  limen  must 
be  used  as  the  basis  of  Weber's  law.2  But  Fechner  stuck  to 
his  guns,3  as  did  also  Miiller.4  In  1904  Miiller  was  wondering 
'wie  in  aller  Welt  kann  man  ohne  weiteres  voraussetzen' 
that  the  measure  of  precision,  which  is  independent  of  many 
factors  entering  into  the  lifting  of  weights,  could  constitute 
the  basis  of  Weber's  law.  Dr.  Thomson  may  need  to  meet 
Miiller's  argument  against  Fechner.5  I  belong  to  the  younger 
generation  to  whom  Weber's  law  and  Unterschiedsempfindlich- 
keit  are  less  sacred  than  they  once  were,  and  I  am  willing  to 
admit  that  the  matter  may  well  wait  for  supporting  facts. 
Experimental  studies  are  wanted  that  show  both  the  threshold 
and  the  interquartile  range  as  functions  of  the  absolute 
magnitude  of  stimulus,  and  then  we  can  determine  how 
each  fits  the  Weber-Fechner  formula.  But  I  am  not  willing 
to  let  Dr.  Thomson  dissuade  us  in  advance  from  an  interest 
in  the  threshold  because  its  'morality'  can  not  be  controlled. 
There  is  enough  experimental  work  to  indicate,  so  it  seems 
to  me,  that  accurate  control  of  the  third  psychophysical 
category  is  possible  and  scientifically  necessary. 

THE  EXPERIMENTAL  CONTROL  OF  THE  PSYCHOPHYSICAL 

JUDGMENTS 

I.  In  the  first  place,  if  we  are  to  gain  accuracy  of  definition 
of  the  psychophysical  categories,  we  must  exclude  the  doubt- 
ful judgments. 

Dr.  Thomson  has  ample  historical  ground  for  including 
them.  They  have  been  left  in  from  the  first.  Fechner  and 
Miiller  called  them  the  'z-cases'  (zzveifelhaft),  as  we  have  seen. 
Miiller  raised  the  question  as  to  whether  'doubtful'  and 
'equal'  judgments  ought  not  to  be  separated,  but  concluded 

*G.  Th.  Fechner,  'Elemente  der  Psychophysik,'  1889,  I,  loiff.;  'Revision  der 
Hauptpunkte  der  Psychophysik,'  1882,  2^f. 

2  G.  E.  Muller,  'Zur  Grundlegung  der  Psychophysik,'  1878,  28f.,  33-36. 

3  Fechner,  '  Revision,'  48f . 

4  Muller,  '  Die  Gesichtspunkte  und  die  Tatsachen  der  Psychophysischen  Metho- 
dik,'  1904,  104-109. 

B  E.  B.  Titchener  summarizes  the  controversy:  Experimental  Psychology,  1905,  II, 
ii,  278-285. 


THE  CONTROL  OF  ATTITUDE  443 

on  experimental  evidence  that  the  positive  impressions  of 
*  equal'  were  rare,  especially  in  trained  observers,  and  that 
separate  treatment  of  them  was  therefore  not  necessary.1 
Titchener  in  1905  grouped  both  'doubtful'  and  'equal'  cases 
under  the  heading  'uj  (uncertain)  or  '?'.2  Urban  in  1908 
had  his  subjects  guess  when  in  doubt  which  weight  of  the 
lifted  pair  was  the  heavier.  Thus  he  obtained  the  categories 
'heavier-guess'  (hg)  and  'lighter-guess'  (Ig),  which  he  saw 
fit  later  to  combine  as  'equality'  judgments.3  In  such  a 
setting  it  is  natural  to  call  the  region  in  which  the  'equality' 
judgments  are  most  frequent  the  'interval  of  uncertainty.' 
Urban's  pupils  have  followed  his  final  practice.  Fernberger 
wrote:  "The  equality  judgment  was  more  complex  [than  the 
other  judgments]  as  it  not  only  included  cases  of  actual 
subjective  equality  .  .  .,  but  also  all  those  cases  where  it 
was  impossible  for  the  subject  to  give  either  a  lighter  or  a 
heavier  judgment,  usually  termed  doubtful  cases."  4 

It  is  under  this  practice  that  Dr.  Thomson  would  reject 
the  interval  of  uncertainty  as  a  measure  of  sensitivity  because 
'any  subject  who  wishes  may  reduce  it  to  zero  .  .  .  simply 
by  determining  that  he  will  never  give  an  answer  undecided.1 
He  is  undoubtedly  thinking  of  results  like  Fernberger's  on 
the  effect  of  attitude  on  the  interval  of  uncertainty;  but 
plainly  he  does  not  accept,  as  I  think  he  should,  Fernberger's 
contention  that  attitude  can  be  controlled  in  the  laboratory 
and  that,  in  view  of  this  state  of  affairs,  it  must  be  controlled.5 

Fernberger's  proposal  was  that  attitude  should  be  rendered 
constant  by  explicit  instructions  and  observational  training, 

1  Miiller,  'Methodik,'  I2f. 

'Titchener,  op.  cit.  II,  i,  io7ff;  ii,  268. 

*F.  M.  Urban,  'The  Application  of  Statistical  Methods  to  the  Problems  of 
Psychophysics,'  1908,  sf.,  15,  99.f.,  io6f.,  nof.,  etc. 

*  S.  W.  Fernberger,  'On  the  Relation  of  the  Methods  of  Just  Perceptible  Differences 
and  Constant  Stimuli,'  Psychol.  Monog.,  1913,  No.  61,  16. 

1  Fernberger,  'The  Effect  of  Attitude  of  the  Subject  upon  the  Measure  of  Sensi- 
tivity,' Amcr.  J.  Psychol.,  1914,  25,  538-543.  Fernberger  refers  here  to  another  case 
in  his  own  experiments  and  to  Warner  Brown's  results.  He  has  since  called  my 
attention  to  a  study  where  three  of  eight  subjects  give  no  interval  of  uncertainty, 
presumably  because  of  failure  of  attitudinal  control:  A.  L.  Ide,  'The  Influence  of 
Temperature  on  the  Formation  of  Judgments  in  Lifted  Weight  Experiments,'  1919, 
25  pp.  (Univ.  Pennsylvania  thesis). 


444  EDWIN  .G  SORING 

but  I  am  going  further  in  insisting  that  the  instructions  and 
experimental  setting  must  assure  a  practically  complete 
elimination  of  doubtful  judgments.  This  is  the  point  of 
George's  study,1  which  merits,  I  think,  considerable  attention 
from  psychophysicists.  George's  thesis  is  that  in  a  psycho- 
physical  experiment  we  are  dealing  with  a  series  of  mental 
states  which  are  a  continuous  function  of  the  given  series 
of  stimuli:  we  vary  the  stimuli  and  note  the  concomitant 
mental  variation.  Under  the  rules  of  scientific  experiment 
everything  else  must  be  kept  constant  including  the  attitude 
and  psychophysical  constitution  of  the  subject;  if  they  are 
inconstant  we  can  no  longer  tell  of  what  our  judgments  are 
a  function.  Moreover,  if  we  find  that  any  particular  cate- 
gory is  in  itself  an  indicator  of  a  change  in  attitude,  we  must 
so  arrange  the  experiment  that  this  form  of  judgment  will 
not  occur  or  rule  it  out  from  the  results  if  it  does  occur,  since 
the  information  that  it  yields  is  beside  the  point  of  the  psycho- 
physical  problem,  which  always  proposes  the  establishment 
of  the  dependence  of  judgment  upon  varying  stimulus. 
George  finds  doubt  and  the  doubtful  judgments  to  be  the 
great  offenders  against  constancy.  His  method  is  the  estab- 
lishment of  an  Einstellung  for  constancy  of  attitude  and  the 
determination  of  (i)  what  categories  the  maintenance  of  the 
Einstellung  rules  out,  (2)  what  categories,  conversely,  are 
noted  by  the  observers  as  interfering  with  the  Einstellung 
when  they  do  appear,  and  (3)  the  objective  evidence  of 
attitudinal  shift  furnished  by  reaction  times.  George's  article 
must  be  its  own  summary;  I  can  not  do  it  justice  here.  It 
is  scarcely  more  than  preliminary  and  his  method  itself  may 
yet  be  called  in  question.  It  would  be  a  slender  weapon  with 
which  to  combat  the  main  body  of  psychophysical  practice 
were  it  not  for  the  fact  that,  like  Dr.  Thomson,  many  psycho- 
physicists  already  know  that  something  or  other  must  be 
done  to  gain  greater  constancy  of  results,  that  the  case 
against  the  doubtful  judgment  is  plausible  a  priori  [is  a 
doubtful  difference  ipso  facto  less  than  an  undoubted  one?], 

1  S.  S.  George,  'Attitude  in  Relation  to  the  Psychophysical  Judgment,'  Amer.  J. 
Psychol.,  1917,  28,  1-37. 


THE  CONTROL  OF  ATTITUDE  445 

and  that  the  attitude  that  George  proposes  as  an  ideal  has 
already  gained  some  slight  support  from  experimental  usage.1 
My  personal  prejudice  for  George's  conditions  I  shall  mention 
presently. 

2.  Doubt  is  the  most  persistent  offender  and  the  one  pre- 
sumably most  responsible  for  Dr.  Thomson's  strictures  upon 
the  interval  of  *  uncertainty,'  but  other  attitudinal  seducers 
must  also  be  dismissed.  George  makes  a  case  against  expec- 
tation, a  case  which  indicates  among  other  things  that  a 
haphazard  method  of  presentation  is  to  be  preferred  to  a 
serial  method  with  partial  knowledge  (e.g.,  the  method  of 
least  perceptible  differences). 

*  Reflective'  judgments  are  the  general  class  under  which 
inconstancy  is  apt  to  occur.  George  does  not  find  that  the 
reflective  attitude  necessarily  means  uncontrolled  variability 
but  merely  that  it  favors  it.  The  reflective  judgment  is 
very  often  equivocally  determined;  the  subject  is  in  a  dilemma 
as  to  his  report  and  decides  what  to  report.  He  may  be 
judging  on  the  basis  of  more  than  one  criterion,  and  may 
find  in  a  given  case  different  categories  concurrently  indicated 
by  different  criteria.  If  he  must  make  a  univocal  report  for 
such  an  equivocal  situation,  he  must  make  some  decision, 
even  though  the  decision  may  be  for  the  category  'undecided.' 
It  is  the  occurrence  of  such  uncontrolled  'decisions,'  I  take  it, 
that  makes  Dr.  Thomson  wish  to  give  up  the  threshold  as  a 
measure  of  sensitivity;  but  his  rejection  of  the  threshold  is 
not  necessary  on  this  score,  since  reflective  judgments  can 
be  avoided. 

George  shows  that  doubtful  judgments  tend  to  be  reflec- 
tive. The  doubting  subject  is  resolving  a  dilemma  in  favor 
of  one  category  or  the  other,  and  does  justice  to  the  unre- 
ported  category  by  labelling  his  judgment  'doubtful.'  The 
'or-judgments'  (e.g.,  'equal-or-less')  are  compromises  in  which 
neither  side  has  won  out.  The  category  'no-difference'  is 
also  often  a  reflective  compromise.  Reflection  and  hesitation 
are,  however,  not  synonymous;  a  judgment  may  be  long 

1  L.  B.  Hoisington,  Anur.  J.  Psychol.,  1917,  28,  $88ff.;  M.  Kincaid,  ibid.,  1918, 
29,  227-232;  A.  M.  Bowman,  ibid.,  1920,  31,  87-90;  C.  C.  Pratt,  ibid.,  1920,  31. 


446  EDWIN  G.  SORING 

delayed  and  yet  come  as  a  simple  report  of  mental  process 
without  any  indication  of  resolution  or  of  attitudinal  in- 
constancy. In  fact  it  seems  probable  that  the  time  of  forma- 
tion of  the  judgment  is  one  of  the  mental  factors  which  under 
a  constant  attitude  is  a  serial  function  of  the  stimulus  and  a 
feasible  subject  for  exact  psychophysical  investigation. 

The  type  of  judgment  furthered  by  ordinary  psycho- 
physical  procedure  is  shown  in  the  introspective  analyses  in 
Fernberger's  recent  monograph.1  These  descriptions  he  ob- 
tained under  conditions  analogous  to  Urban's  except  in  so 
far  as  the  introspection  itself  interfered.  Compared  with 
what  I  have  in  mind  as  the  ideal,  they  show  a  relatively 
complex — often  very  complex — process  of  comparing.  I 
should  not  on  the  basis  of  them  expect  even  the  degree  of 
constancy  which  one  actually  does  get.  The  equality  judg- 
ments are  typically  reflective  in  that  they  involve  a  'verifica- 
tion process,'  which  Fernberger,  as  if  in  support  of  George, 
seems  to  equate  to  'doubt.'  2 

Of  course  what  is  needed  to  support  my  argument,  and 
what  is  lacking,  is  the  companion  introspective  study  made 
under  George's  conditions.  Perhaps  these  consciousnesses 
would  not  prove  so  simple  as  I  think.  My  conviction  that  the 
two  consciousnesses  would,  however,  be  very  different  affairs 
is  dependent,  I  must  in  honesty  confess,  upon  personal 
experience.  I  was  one  of  George's  observers  and  I  have 
observed  in  other  experiments  under  his  conditions.  I  have 
also  observed  with  lifted  weights  on  the  turning-top  table 
under  conditions  patterned  after  Urban's.  And  the  two  con- 
sciousnesses are  to  me  almost  unbelievably  different.  Under 
the  conventional  procedure  I  am  constantly  forced  into  resolu- 
tions, verifications,  decisions,  like  those  that  Fernberger 
describes,  and  thus  I  am  led  into  doubt  and  discomfort, 
and  thence  into  a  naive  uncritical  attitude  which  affords  no 
assurance  of  rigorous  constancy.  Under  George's  conditions 
enough  effort  is  required  to  be  sure,  but  the  mental  process 
is  kept  simple  or  else  rejected.  I  do  not  have  to  report  a 

1  Fernberger,  'An  Introspective  Analysis  of  Comparing,'  Psychol.  Monog.,  1919, 
No.  117. 

2  E.g.,  ibid.,  p.  160. 


THE  CONTROL  OF  ATTITUDE  447 

complex  situation  by  an  inadequately  simple  word,  nor  an 
equivocal  setting  by  a  univocal  judgment.  It  seems  reason- 
able, does  it  not,  that  a  report  under  George's  conditions 
should  be  worth  more  than  a  report  under  Urban's,  because  it 
leads  to  attitudinal  constancy  or  the  detection  of  inconstancy 
when  it  does  occur.1 

3.  There  is  as  much  to  be  gained  by  the  establishment  of 
definite  serial  criteria  of  judgment  as  by  the  elimination  of 
unsuitable  categories  of  judgment.  In  fact,  these  two  reme- 
dies are  obverse  and  reverse.  One  can  not  get  rid  of  doubt, 
for  instance,  unless  the  judgments  are  based  upon  a  univocal 
criterion.  Two  criteria  that  may  conflict  are  fatal  to  con- 
stancy since  their  resolution  is  left  to  chance. 

The  'stimulus  error'  is  a  term  which  among  other  things 
characterizes  judgments  where  a  definite  mental  criterion  is 
not  established  but  judgment  is  left  to  chance  habits.  The 
term  is  undoubtedly  much  maligned  as  there  are  cases  where 
the  direction  of  the  attention  to  the  stimulus  is  psychologically 
useful,  as  in  the  preliminary  investigation  of  a  new  perceptual 
field.  But  in  general  the  stimulus  attitude  means  indefinite- 
ness  and  instability  of  criterion,  as  George  pointed  out.2  A 
recent  series  of  studies  on  the  various  criteria  that  may 
underlie  the  judgments  of  cutaneous  duality  shows  how 
fundamental  to  accurate  psychophysical  work  an  avoidance 
of  the  stimulus  attitude  is.3  In  lifted  weights  Friedlander's 

1  In  justice  to  Urban  it  must  be  said  that  I  do  not  believe  he  would  experiment 
now  as  he  did  in  1908.  C/.,  e.g.,  the  'Statistical  Methods,'  1908  (op.  «'/.),  with  his 
'Ueber  einige  Begriffe  und  Aufgaben  der  Psychophysik,'  Arch.f.  d.  ges.  Psycho!.,  1913, 
30,  113-152.  It  is  a  pity  that  he  has  not  yet  been  able  to  return  to  experimental  work 
since  writing  his  systematic  articles.  Moreover,  both  Urban  and  Fernberger  have  been 
under  a  special  disadvantage  in  that  they  were  dealing  with  a  peculiarly  refractory 
material,  lifted  weights.  Isolation  of  a  homogeneous  series  of  univocal  mental  cor- 
relates of  the  stimulus  is  very  difficult  in  the  lifting  process,  although  it  has  been 
attempted:  H.  Friedlander,  'Die  Wahrnehmung  der  Schwere,'  Zeitsch.  f.  PsychoL, 
1920,  83,  129-120. 

*  George,  op.  cit.,  35f. 

*  E.  J.  Gates,  "The  Determinations  of  the  Limens  of  Single  and  Dual  Impression 
by  the  Method  of  Constant  Stimuli,'  Amer.  /.  PsychoL,  1915,  26,  152-157;  Titchener, 
'Ethnological  Tests  of  Sensation  and  Perception,'  etc.,  Proc.  Amer.  Philos.  Soc.,  1916, 
55,  206-215;  E.  deLaski,  'Perceptive  Forms  below  the  Level  of  the  Two-point  Limen,' 
Amer.  J.  PsychoL,  1916,  27,  569-571;  C.  L.  Friedline,  'Discrimination  of  Two  Cutane- 
ous Patterns  below  the  Two-point  Limen,"  ibid.,  1918,  29,  400-419. 


448  EDWIN  G.  BORING 

experiments,  although  they  leave  much  of  psychophysical 
accuracy  to  be  desired,  seem  at  least  to  show  that  different 
numerical  results  follow  when  attention  is  upon  the  weight 
and  when  it  is  upon  the  sensory  aspects  of  the  lifting.1 

The  more  general  ground  for  the  control  of  criteria  is  the 
one  which  Fernberger  took  in  defense  of  the  interval  of  un- 
certainty.2 The  subjects  must  be  constantly  and  effectively 
eingestelltj  and  the  test  of  an  effective  Einstellung  lies  in 
preliminary  trials,  the  taking  of  introspections,  and  the 
observer's  full  and  repeated  characterizations  of  their  attitude. 

4.  The  need  for  the  isolation  of  the  single  judgment  within 
the  series  is  perhaps  worth  especial  mention  since  the  matter 
has  just  been  [implicitly]  brought  to  fore  by  Fernberger's 
measurement  of  the  effect  of  one  member  of  a  series  upon  a 
succeeding  member.3  Under  Urban's  conditions  with  the 
turning-top  table  Fernberger  found  that  the  judgment 
'lighter'  of  a  pair  of  lifted  weights  tends  to  be  succeeded  by  a 
judgment  'heavier,'  and  vice  versa.  'Fixing'  a  series  so  that 
one  kind  or  the  other  of  sequences  predominates  produces  as 
startling  effects  upon  the  form  of  the  psychometric  functions 
as  anything  that  Dr.  Thomson  is  complaining  of.  Plainly 
some  sort  of  expectational  or  rhythmic  effect  is  operative; 
attitude  is  not  remaining  constant.  Fernberger's  solution  of 
the  difficulty  is  to  balance  one  sort  of  succession  against  the 
other,  and  trust  that  they  will  cancel.  For  myself,  I  could 
not  feel  secure  in  such  a  procedure;  an  algebraic  cancellation 
where  the  factors  are  so  little  understood  can  not  be  so  satis- 
factory as  an  actual  elimination.  The  members  of  the  series 
should  be  separated  by  an  interval — a  distracted  interval  if 
necessary — so  that  the  intraserial  effects  are  broken  up.  This 
course  slows  down  the  rate  of  experimentation  and  robs  the 
turning-top  table  of  much  of  its  charm;  but,  even  when  rela- 
tive frequencies  are  aimed  at,  I  do  not  conceive  that  numbers 
of  cases  can  be  allowed  to  weigh  against  rigorous  scientific 
control. 

1  Friedlander,  op.  cit. 

2  Fernberger,  Amer.  J.  Psychol.,  1914,  23,  538ff.  (op.  cit.). 

8  Fernberger,  'Interdependence  of  Judgments  within  the  Series  for  the  Method 
of  Constant  Stimuli,'  /.  Exper.  Psychol.,  1920,  3,  126-150. 


THE  CONTROL  OF  ATTITUDE  449 

5.  Lest  the  argumental  sauce  obscure  the  meat,  let  me 
summarize.  I  recommend  (i)  that  every  judgment  in  the 
psychophysical  experiment  stand  absolutely  independently  in 
its  own  right.  One  member  of  the  series  must  be  separated 
from  the  others  in  time,  and  by  the  instruction  to  the  subject 
that  he  judge  it  without  reference  to  any  other  member. 
Haphazard  presentation  should  be  the  rule;  at  any  rate  serial 
presentations  with  partial  knowledge  should  not  be  allowed 
since  they  connect  the  members  and  interfere  with  their 
individuality.  I  urge  further  (2)  that  the  criteria  of  judg- 
ment be  laid  down  explicitly  and  univocally  in  psychological 
terms.  These  psychological  terms  will  be  sensory  in  the 
class  of  experiments  especially  under  consideration.  Judg- 
ments of  stimulus  are  often  desirable,  but  they  are  not  the 
final  ideal  since  they  are  ipso  facto  equivocal.1  The  univocal 
character  of  the  criteria  must  be  tested  by  introspection  and 
by  the  subjects'  report.  (3)  The  total  Aufgabe  under  which 
the  subject  judges  must  be  made  definite  in  instructions,  and 
must  be  more  fully  determined  by  means  of  repeated  char- 
acterizations by  the  subject  of  his  attitude  and  procedure. 
This  latter  check  is  important  since  much  of  the  subject's 
instruction  is  apt  to  be  a  self-instruction.  (4)  The  subject 
must  be  both  instructed  and  trained  to  maintain  a  constant 
attitude  throughout  the  experiment  and  to  report  lapses  from 
this  attitude.  When  he  has  learned  the  full  meaning  of  this 
instruction,  he  will  not  give  doubtful  judgments  nor  ordinarily 
be  doubtful,  provided  his  task  is  made  sufficiently  easy  for 
him  by  the  means  of  the  three  foregoing  rules.  He  will  in 
like  manner  avoid  other  reflective  judgments  that  violate  the 
constant  attitude.  (5)  He  will  probably  tend  to  give  imme- 
diate judgments,  and  he  will  be  greatly  helped  if  he  is  en- 
couraged to  report  quickly.  His  times,  however,  will  vary 

ll  have  met  psychologists  who  smile  superiorly  when  I  mention  the  'stimulus- 
error'  and  even  have  something  to  say  in  reply  about  'bigoted  introspectionism,'  so 
I  know  that  I  ought  not,  on  purely  diplomatic  grounds,  to  bring  the  stimulus-error  in; 
but  unfortunately  for  diplomacy  it  belongs  in.  I  hope  some  day  to  show  that  the 
stimulus-error  is  not  a  figment  of  an  epistemologizing  or  a  quibbling  mind,  but  that  it 
is  a  very  real  scientific  devil.  In  the  meantime  let  those  whom  numerical  measures 
alone  will  impress,  see  Friedline,  and  Friedlander,  opp.  citt. 


450  EDWIN  G.  BORING 

and  there  will  occasionally  be  long  delays  [they  seem  like 
*  inhibitory  jams'!]  without  gross  shift  of  attitude. 

Undoubtedly  research  will  bring  more  means  of  control 
to  the  fore,  but  the  observance  of  these  five  rules  alone  will, 
I  think,  give  Dr.  Thomson  data  for  which  the  thresholds  will 
show  the  degree  of  constancy  that  he  desires.  If  in  the  course 
of  doing  all  this  he  thinks  that  we  have  made  the  thresholds 
'more  physiological'  and  less  'moral,'  well  and  good.  It  is 
of  this  sort  of  stuff,  nevertheless,  that  psychology  is  made. 

THE  NATURE  OF  THE  PSYCHOMETRIC  FUNCTIONS 

In  the  article  which  has  caused  me  to  write  this  paper,  Dr. 
Thomson  supplies  us  with  certain  suggestions  as  to  the  nature 
of  the  psychometric  functions — an  exposition  that  employs 
the  familiar  device  of  the  urn  and  balls.  He  gains  comfort 
from  this  analogue,  I  take  it,  because  within  it  he  can  show 
how  the  number  of  black  balls  necessary  for  a  given  category 
'depends  upon  a  conscious  act  of  the  subject,  and  can  be 
varied,  if  he  be  so  disposed,  at  his  whim.'  He  gains  support 
for  his  analogue  (i)  from  the  fact  that  it  gives  psychometric 
functions  that  are  in  accord  with  present  statistical  analysis1 
in  that  they  are  not  normal  curves  (they  are  not  the  phi- 
function  of  gamma  nor  the  normal  bell)  and  (2)  from  the 
fact  that  the  three  psychometric  functions  are  founded  upon 
a  single  underlying  error  curve.  I  am  quite  ready  to  be 
convinced  of  (i),  but  (2)  seems  to  me  scarcely  a  reason,  since 
there  are  other  ways  of  founding  a  set  of  psychometric 
functions  upon  a  single  error  function.  I  have  suggested  such 
a  derivation  elsewhere,2  and  I  desire  here  to  raise  the  question 
which  of  these  two  analogues  better  represents  our  notion 
of  the  psychophysical  organism,  and,  furthermore,  whether 
experiment  and  curve-fitting  may  not  ultimately  decide 
between  the  two  and  thus  throw  light  upon  the  nature  of 
sensitivity. 

1  Cf.,  Thomson,  op.  cit.,  304-307;  'The  Criterion  of  Goodness  of  Fit  of  Psycho- 
physical  Curves,'  Biometrika,  1919,  12,  226-229. 

2  Boring,  'A  Chart  of  the  Psychometric  Function,'  Amer.  J.  Psychol,  1917,  28, 
465-470. 


THE  CONTROL  OF  ATTITUDE  45' 

Dr.  Thomson's  parable  runs  thus.  A  stimulus  (or  a 
stimulus-pair)  is  like  an  urn  with  black  and  white  balls 
in  it  in  a  given  proportion.  The  experimental  trial  is  the 
drawing  of  a  given  (constant)  number  of  balls  from  the  urn. 
Something  varies  so  that  different  numbers  of  black  balls 
turn  up  in  the  successive  drawings.  The  number  of  black 
balls  drawn  represents  the  impression;  there  is  a  series  of 
impressions  possible  for  a  single  stimulus  all  the  way  from 
no  black  balls  to  all  black  balls.  (At  least  so  I  interpret  Dr. 
Thomson.)  The  subject  reports  on  this  series  in  terms  of 
(say)  three  categories.  Dr.  Thomson  thinks  that  the  subject 
decides,  'if  he  be  so  disposed,  at  his  whim'  what  proportions 
of  black  balls  drawn  shall  be  reported  by  each  of  the  cate- 
gories, e.g.,  whether  40  per  cent,  to  60  per  cent,  shall  be 
reported  as  'undecided'  with  the  reports  'less'  for  under  40 
per  cent,  and  'greater'  for  over  60  per  cent.  I  urge  that  rigid 
criteria  should  replace  the  subject's  whim.  The  same  thing 
happens  for  the  other  stimuli,  which  are  represented  each  by 
other  urns  in  which  the  proportion  of  black  balls  is  different. 
The  series  of  urns,  analogous  to  the  series  of  stimuli,  shows  a 
continuously  increasing  (or  decreasing)  proportion  of  black 
balls,  but  the  relation  between  the  place  of  the  urn  in  the 
series  (stimulus-value)  and  the  proportion  of  black  balls  need 
not  be  linear.  Psychometric  functions  result  that  are  similar 
to  those  actually  obtained  in  practice,  although  they  are  not 
normal  functions. 

My  own  parable,  adapted  to  the  differential  limen  and  the 
urn,  separates  the  stimulus  from  the  organism.  A  given 
stimulus  supplies  a  fixed  number  of  black  and  white  balls, 
since  a  stimulus  is  ideally  constant.  In  stimulating  the 
organism  its  effect  is  facilitated  or  inhibited  according  to  the 
chance  disposition  of  the  organism,  that  is  to  say,  the  organism 
is  an  urn  from  which  an  additional  number  of  black  and  white 
balls  is  drawn  to  be  added  to  the  fixed  number  determined 
by  the  stimulus.  The  total  resulting  proportion  of  black 
balls  fixes  the  position  of  the  impression  in  the  impressional 
series,  and  the  report  in  terms  of  predetermined  categories 
occurs  as  it  does  in  Dr.  Thomson's  reasoning.  The  constant 


452  EDWIN  G.  BORING 

tendency  toward  a  given  proportion  of  black  balls  is  a  func- 
tion of  the  magnitude  of  the  stimulus,  and  the  variability 
about  this  constant  tendency  is  a  function  of  the  organism 
(the  urn).  The  proportion  of  black  to  white  balls  in  the 
urn  may  be  anything  at  all  but  is  the  same  for  all  stimuli. 
The  resulting  ogive  psychometric  functions  may,  in  a  certain 
simple  case,  be  normal,  but  there  is  no  reason  why  they 
should  be  nor  a  priori  presumption  that  they  would  be. 

My  first  question  is  this.  Is  it  not  more  reasonable  to 
ascribe  constancy  to  the  stimulus  and  variability  to  the 
organism,  and  to  assume  a  law  of  physiological  variability 
that  is  fixed  and  independent  of  the  magnitude  of  the  stimu- 
lus? In  other  words,  should  not  the  organism  be  represented 
by  a  single  urn  with  contents  of  fixed  composition?  I  confess 
I  am  not  clear  as  to  what  Dr.  Thomson's  urns  symbolize  nor 
as  to  precisely  where  in  his  scheme  variability  occurs.  He  has 
an  urn  of  different  composition  for  every  stimulus.  If 
variability  resides  in  the  organism,  then  the  law  of  varia- 
bility changes  for  every  stimulus,  and  such  an  occurrence 
does  not  seem  to  me  physiologically  understandable. 

To  my  second  question  I  am  not  even  prepared  to  suggest 
an  answer.  May  it  not  be^possible  to  determine  empirically 
what  urn-and-ball  analogy  best  fits  the  facts,  and  thus 
analytically  to  learn  something  new  of  the  laws  of  organic 
variability?  A  determination  would  be  ever  so  much  better 
than  guesses — Dr.  Thomson's  or  mine, — but  for  most  psy- 
chologists curve-fitting  is  precarious  work.  If  we  had  the 
proper  data,  would  the  mathematical  solution  be  feasible? 
Perhaps  Dr.  Thomson  will  tell  us. 


THE   PHYSICAL   MEASUREMENT  AND 
SPECIFICATION   OF   COLOR 

BY  LOYD  A.  JONES  AND  PRENTICE  REEVES 
Eastman  Kodak  Co.,  Rochester,  N.  Y. 

A  complete  understanding  of  the  subject  of  color  involves 
a  knowledge  not  only  of  the  nature  of  the  sensation  resulting 
from  the  action  of  the  radiant  energy  upon  the  retina,  but 
also  of  the  exact  physical  composition  of  that  radiation.  The 
physicist  has  been  inclined  to  overlook  the  nature  of  the 
sensation  and  to  regard  as  sufficient  for  a  complete  specifica- 
tion of  color  a  determination  of  the  exact  physical  composition 
of  the  radiation  considered.  On  the  other  hand,  the  psycholo- 
gist has  been  prone  to  neglect  the  radiation  factors  and  to 
regard  as  sufficient  a  specification  of  the  nature  of  the  sensa- 
tion resulting  when  this  radiation  acts  upon  the  retina.  It  is 
important  for  the  sake  of  continued  progress  in  this  field  that 
both  phases  be  given  due  consideration.  In  this  paper  it  is 
proposed  to  present  an  outline  of  the  methods  whereby  the 
various  factors  necessary  for  the  complete  specification  of 
color  may  be  determined.  It  is  the  desire  of  the  writers  to 
treat  this  subject  so  as  to  give  a  broad  general  survey  of  the 
whole  field  in  order  that  the  interrelations  between  the  various 
factors  may  be  emphasized  rather  than  to  deal  in  detail  with 
any  specific  phase. 

A  careful  consideration  of  the  subject  as  a  whole  leads  to 
the  conclusion  that  for  the  measurement  and  specification  of 
the  nature  of  the  stimulus,  i.e.,  radiant  energy,  analytical 
methods  must  be  employed,  while  in  dealing  with  the  sensa- 
tion the  methods  are  necessarily  of  the  synthetic  type.  The 
necessity  of  using  analytical  methods  in  dealing  with  the 
stimulus  is  due  to  the  fact  that  radiation  in  general  is  com- 
posite in  nature  and  must  be  separated  into  its  component 
parts  in  order  that  each  may  be  measured.  The  most  gen- 
erally accepted  theory  of  radiation  postulates  that  radiant 

453 


454  LOYD  A.  JONES  AND  PRENTICE  REEVES 

energy  is  transmitted  as  a  form  of  transverse  wave  motion  in 
which  the  wave-length  or  frequency  may  vary  throughout 
wide  limits.  When  radiation  of  certain  wave-lengths  reach 
the  retina  the  sensation  of  light  is  produced.  The  wave- 
length is  usually  specified  in  terms  of  millimicrons  (MM)>  the 
micron  being  one  thousandth  (.001)  of  a  millimeter.  The 
Angstrom  unit  (.000,0001  mm.)  is  sometimes  used  and  is 
one-tenth  of  a  millimicron.  The  visual  range  is  approxi- 
mately from  400  to  700  nfj,  although  radiation  of  shorter  or 
longer  wave-length  may  be  perceived  if  sufficiently  intense. 

When  any  stimulus  acts  on  the  retina  the  resulting  sensa- 
tion gives  no  indication  as  to  whether  or  not  the  stimulus  is 
simple  or  compound  in  nature.  This  indicates  that  the  retina 
is  a  synthetic  receptor  and  does  not  recognize  the  individual 
component  parts  of  the  radiation  as  such  but  receives  the 
mixed  radiation  as  a  single  stimulus  producing  a  single 
sensation.  The  sensation  produced  may  be  specified  by  two 
factors,  brightness  and  color,  the  former  being  dependent  on 
the  intensity,  and  the  latter  on  the  quality  (wave-length 
composition)  of  the  stimulus.  The  Committee  on  Nomencla- 
ture and  Standards  of  the  Illuminating  Engineering  Society 
states:  "Color  of  luminous  flux  is  the  subjective  evaluation 
by  the  eye  of  the  quality  of  the  luminous  flux.  Any  color 
can  be  expressed  in  terms  of  its  hue  and  saturation."  l 

Since  visual  sensation  is  dependent  upon  the  radiant 
energy  emitted  by  some  luminous  source,  it  will  be  well  to 
consider  briefly  the  manner  in  which  the  quality  of  such 
emitted  radiation  may  be  measured  and  specified.  This  is 
most  satisfactorily  accomplished  by  separating  the  radiation 
into  its  component  parts  and  measuring  the  intensity  of  the 
individual  element.  This  factor  is  properly  expressed  in 
watts  (or  ergs  per  second)  per  square  centimeter  of  the  emit- 
ting source  per  unit  difference  in  wave-length.  Such  values 
when  plotted  as  ordinates  against  the  various  wave-lengths 
as  abscissae  result  in  a  graphic  representation  of  the  spectral 
energy  distribution  for  the  source  considered.  Such  a  curve 
is  commonly  referred  to  as  a  'spectral  energy  curve'  or 

1  Trans.  Ilium.  Eng.  Soc.,  1918,  13,  515. 


\ 


PHYSICAL  MEASUREMENT  OF  COLOR 


455 


'emission  curve*  and  when  determined  for  all  wave-lengths 
within  the  visible  range  constitutes  a  physical  specification 
of  the  quality  of  the  emitted  radiation,  and  hence  of  its  color. 
The  measurement  of  the  energy  values  is  accomplished  by 
use  of  an  instrument  known  as  the  spectro-radiometer  in 
which  either  a  bolometer  or  thermopile  is  usually  employed 
as  a  receiving  element.  It  will  not  be  advisable  to  go  into  a 
detailed  discussion  of  such  instruments  and  methods  at  the 
present  time,  and  for  more  complete  information  the  reader 


160 

CYLINDRICAL  ACETYLENE  FLAME. 

/ 

/ 

/ 

SPECTRAL)  . 
5  I 

/ 

/ 

^•ou 

O 

(T 
UJ 

UJ 

40 
0 

/ 

/ 

' 

/ 

—  .  — 

.-" 

^ 

420                                  580                                  74 
WAVE  LENGTH 
FIG.  I 

is  referred  to  the  literature  on  spectro  radiometry.1  The 
spectral  energy  curves  of  many  sources  have  been  precisely 
determined  and  as  a  typical  example,  the  curve  of  the  cylin- 
drical acetylene  flame  is  shown  in  Fig.  I.  A  black  body  is 
probably  the  best  standard  for  spectral  energy  distribution, 

1  Nutting,  P.  G.,  'Outlines  of  Applied  Optics.'  Philadelphia:  P.  Blakiston's  Sons 
&  Co.,  1912,  p.  234,  Chapter  IX.  Also  see  recent  reports  by  P.  D.  Foote  in  Trans. 
Amer.  Inst.  of  Mining  and  Metallurgical  Engineers. 


456  LOYD  A.  JONES  AND  PRENTICE  REEVES 

but  a  black  body  is  difficult  to  realize  in  practice  so  that  a 
standard  acetylene  burner  operated  under  the  conditions 
recently  specified  by  Hyde1  is  practically  identical  with  a 
black  body  operated  at  2360°  K.,  i.e.,  2087°  C.  Such  a 
source  is  easily  reproducible. 

The  precise  determination  of  the  emission  curve  of  the 
source  requires  an  elaborate  equipment  and  considerable 
experience  in  manipulation  on  the  part  of  the  operator. 
However,  if  this  function  is  known  for  one  source  that  of  any 
other  can  be  determined  indirectly  with  considerable  ease 
by  a  method  of  spectrophotometry.  The  method  consists 
simply  of  a  comparison  and  quantitative  measurement,  wave- 
length by  wave-length,  of  the  intensity  of  the  unknown 
source  in  terms  of  that  of  the  known  throughout  the  visible 
range.  A  spectrophotometer  for  this  purpose  consists  essen- 
tially of  an  optical  system  such  that  two  beams  of  light,  one 
from  the  source  whose  spectral  emission  is  known  and  the 
other  from  the  source  which  is  being  measured,  may  be  dis- 
persed into  their  component  parts.  From  the  spectra  thus 
formed  narrow  regions  may  be  isolated  and  used  to  illuminate 
the  parts  of  some  suitable  photometric  field.  In  the  path 
of  one  beam  is  situated  some  device  such  as  a  pair  of  Nicol 
prisms,  a  rotating  sector,  or  a  slit  of  variable  width  by  which 
the  intensity  of  that  beam  may  be  varied  in  a  known  manner. 
By  the  proper  adjustment  of  this  device,  a  photometric 
balance  may  be  made  and  from  the  constants  of  the  system 
the  ratio  of  the  intensity  of  the  known  to  the  unknown  is 
determined.  The  measurement  of  this  ratio  at  a  sufficient 
number  of  points  suitably  spaced  throughout  the  visual  wave- 
length range  provides  the  data  from  which  the  emission  curve 
may  be  plotted.  As  examples  of  the  most  commonly  used 
spectrophotometers  may  be  mentioned  the  Lummer-Brodhun, 
the  Brace,  the  Hufner,  Konig-Martins,  each  of  which  has  its 
peculiar  advantages  and  disadvantages  for  the  various  special 
purposes  in  the  field  of  spectrophotometry.  Space  does  not 
permit  a  detailed  discussion  of  this  instrument  and  again  the 

1  Hyde,  Forsythe  &  Cady,  /.  Frank.  Inst.,  1919,  188,  129-130.  See  also  Coblentz, 
ibid.,  1918,  188,  299. 


PHYSICAL  MEASUREMENT  OF  COLOR  457 

reader  is  referred  to  the  literature  on  the  subject  for  more 
complete  information.1 

Non-luminous  objects  are  visible  only  by  virtue  of  the 
radiant  energy  which  they  transmit,  reflect,  or  otherwise 
divert,  in  such  manner  that  it  enters  the  eye  and  falls  upon 
the  retina.  In  case  an  object  reflects  or  transmits  to  an 
equal  extent  all  wave-lengths  of  the  incident  energy  within 
the  visible  range,  it  is  said  to  be  visually  non-selective  or 
colorless.  This  class  of  objects  includes  all  true  grays,  which 
form  a  scale  varying  only  in  intensity,  and  limited  at  the 
extremes  by  black  and  white.  However,  when  an  object 
transmits  or  reflects  to  an  unequal  extent  the  wave-lengths  of 
the  incident  energy  it  is  visually  selective  and  is  colored. 
Every  known  substance  absorbs  to  some  extent  radiation  of 
some  wave-length  and  nearly  all  absorb  very  strongly  at 
some  particular  wave-length  or  spectral  region.  The  colors 
of  opaque  objects  depend  upon  the  ratio  of  reflecting  to 
absorbing  power  for  each  wave-length. 

A  saturated  color,  that  is  a  pure  hue,  reflects  or  transmits 
a  very  narrow  region  of  the  spectrum,  i.e.,  absorbs  most  of 
the  spectrum  and  is,  practically  speaking,  monochromatic. 
Such  media  are  rare  in  nature  and  practice,  as  most  objects 
we  meet  are  far  from  being  monochromatic.  The  spectro- 
photometer  is  used  to  determine  the  amount  of  transmission 
or  reflection  at  each  wave-length.  Fig.  2  shows  the  curve  of 
a  green  filter  with  wave-lengths  as  abscissae  and  density  as 
ordinates  in  one  curve  and  transmission  as  ordinates  in  the 
other.  This  type  of  curve  is  rather  typical  of  ordinary  colored 
things  with  the  maximum  transmission  in  a  certain  spectral 
region  and  the  somewhat  gradual  sloping  to  zero  transmission 
on  either  side.  A  density  of  I  allows  ten  per  cent,  of  the 
incident  light  to  pass  so  the  corresponding  transmission  is 
O.I,  a  density  of  2  transmits  I  per  cent,  and  so  on.  Density 
is  the  logarithm  of  the  reciprocal  of  the  transmission,  i.e., 
D  =  log  i/T.  If  two  filters  are  taken  together  their  com- 
bined density  is  the  sum  of  the  separate  densities  and  their 

1  Nutting,  op.  cit.,  Chapter  VIII.  Also  annual  reports  of  Committee  on  Progress 
in  Trans.  Ilium.  Eng.  Soc. 


458 


LOYD  A.  JONES  AND  PRENTICE  REEVES 


transmission  is  the  product  of  the  separate  transmissions. 
The  physical  law  of  absorption  stated  that  the  absorption  at 
any  wave-length  is  an  exponential  function  of  the  thickness 
of  the  absorbing  media  or  in  other  words  if  a  unit  thickness 
transmits  a  fraction  7",  absorbs  (i  —  71),  then  the  next  unit 
thickness  will  transmit  the  same  fraction  of  what  remains 
and  a  thickness  X  will  transmit  the  fraction  Tx.  This  law 
applies  only  to  homogeneous  media  and  monochromatic 
radiation. 


2.2 


to 


o- 

440 


/? 


\ 


\ 


500  560 

WAVE  LENGTH 

FIG.  2 


620 


V) 


.10 


680 


A  spectrophotometric  curve  gives  the  relative  transmission 
of  a  filter  but  may  be  taken  as  indicative  of  color  only  when 
the  composition  of  the  incident  light  is  known  and  specified 
as  shown  by  the  spectral  energy  curve.  If  we  change  the 
nature  of  the  incident  light  through  a  filter,  or  on  a  reflecting 
surface,  we  also  change  the  nature  of  the  transmitted  or 
reflected  light.  Another  important  thing  to  bear  in  mind  is 
that  equal  energies  do  not  produce  equal  brightnesses  and 
this  is  illustrated  in  Fig.  3  which  shows  the  so-called  visibility 


PHYSICAL  MEASUREMENT  OF  COLOR 


459 


curve  for  an  average  eye.  This  curve  is  determined  by 
measuring  the  relative  amount  of  energy  necessary  at  each 
wave-length  to  cause  equal  sensations  of  brightness.  If  we 


to 

.9 
£ 
.7 
A 

3 
.f 
J 
.2 

./ 
0 

V/SIBt 

.ITY  C 

URVfS 

/J 

^ 

NVv 

// 

\ 

ll 

•' 

I 

I 

II 

1 

1 

" 

1 

fc 

1 

% 

3 

§       ; 
§      L 

I 

V 

• 

Vx 

?/ 

% 

/ 

N 

WAVE 

LENG1 

H 

tf    JO    3    Si    Si    &  tt  Sb   51   58  69   60  6/    hi   63   6f 

-  Author  -j 

---  Nutting')  •• 

-----  lvci<  -      .,  „          , 

---  Curve  calculated  from 


FIG.  3 

take  the  maximum  sensibility  as  unity  (the  point  in  the  spec- 
trum being  556  /zju)  the  relative  energy  values  for  other  wave- 
lengths in  the  visible  spectrum  are  represented  by  the  ordi- 


460  LOYD  A.  JONES  AND  PRENTICE  REEFES 

nates  of  the  curve.1  This  shape  and  position  of  the  maximum 
of  the  visibility  curve  varies  with  intensity  of  illumination 
as  we  might  expect  from  dealing  with  peripheral  or  foveal 
vision.  The  product  of  spectral  energy  and  visibility  at  each 
wave-length  gives  luminosity  and  it  is  really  the  luminosity 
curve  that  we  consider  when  treating  a  visual  stimulus. 

Spectrophotometry  gives  the  exact  physical  composition 
of  the  radiation  in  question,  i.e.,  analyzes  the  stimulus,  but 
does  not  provide  any  direct  specification  of  the  subjective 
factors  of  the  color  sensation  resulting  when  this  radiation 
impinges  upon  the  retina.  This  brings  us  then  to  the  syn- 
thetic method  by  which  the  specification  of  the  sensation  is 
made  directly  in  terms  of  the  subjective  factors,  brightness 
and  color.  Brightness  is  dependent  upon  the  intensity  and 
color  upon  the  quality  of  the  incident  radiation.  These 
measurements  are  usually  made  by  means  of  a  colorimeter, 
the  action  of  which  is  based  on  the  fact  that  any  color  can 
be  matched  by  a  mixture  in  proper  proportions  of  mono- 
chromatic light  of  the  correct  wave-length,  with  white  light. 
The  wave-length  of  the  monochromatic  light  used  is  termed 
the  "wave-length  of  the  dominant  hue"  and  constitutes  the 
specification  of  the  hue  factor.  The  amount  of  white  light 
necessary  to  make  a  match  taken  as  a  percentage  of  the  total 
mixture  is  known  as  the  per  cent,  white  and  represents  the 
saturation  factor.  In  case  the  color  to  be  matched  is  a  non- 
spectral color  such  as  a  purple  or  a  magenta  the  complement 
of  the  color  is  found  and  the  specification  stated  in  terms  of 
the  complementary  color.  Brightness  is  measured  by  a  suit- 
able photometer  which  may  or  may  not  be  an  integral  part 
of  the  colorimeter  itself.  In  the  case  of  reflecting  surfaces 
the  intensity  factor  is  specified  in  terms  of  reflecting  power, 
in  case  of  transmitting  media,  by  the  total  transmission  and 
in  case  of  emitting  sources  by  the  intensity  of  the  source. 

In  the  latest  colorimeters  it  is  possible  to  read  hue  to  a 
fraction  of  a  wave-length  in  the  visible  spectrum  and  a 
problem  which  arises  from  such  a  possibility  is  the  determina- 

1  Reeves,  P.,  'The  Visibility  of  Radiation,'  Trans.  Ilium.  Eng.  Soc.,  1918,  13,  101. 
The  most  extensive  work  on  this  subject  was  published  by  Coblentz  and  Emerson. 
Sci.  Paper  303,  Bureau  of  Standards,  issued  September  12,  IQI7- 


PHYSICAL  MEASUREMENT  OF  COLOR 

tion  of  a  hue  scale.  If  we  desire  to  measure  any  quantity  it 
is  first  necessary  to  have  a  unit  of  measurement  which  is 
constant  throughout  the  entire  scale.  (For  example,  an  inch 
is  an  inch,  or  a  pint  a  pint  wherever  it  may  be  taken.)  When 
examining  the  visible  spectrum,  however,  we  find  that  equal 
wave-length  intervals  do  not  produce  equal  color  sensation 
intervals  at  different  parts  of  the  spectrum,  so  the  wave- 
length is  not  a  satisfactory  unit  in  the  establishment  of  a 
scale  of  subjective  color  sensation  and  a  hue  scale  established 
with  fixed  wave-length  intervals  as  a  unit  is  therefore  un- 
satisfactory. The  question  as  to  whether  or  not  the  difference 
limen  is  equal  at  all  points  on  any  sensation  scale  has  been 
discussed  pro  and  con  for  years  but  from  a  physical  stand- 
point it  seems  permissible  to  make  these  points  equal  by 
definition  and  call  the  least  perceptible  difference  the  sensation 
unit  and  use  it  as  such  in  establishing  sensation  scales.  So 
the  experimental  problem  in  establishing  a  fundamental  hue 
scale  is  to  determine  the  relation  existing  between  the  wave- 
length unit  and  the  least  perceptible  difference  in  hue  for  the 
entire  range  of  visible  radiation.  Two  methods  of  procedure 
present  themselves,1  one  method  measuring  the  least  per- 
ceptible difference  at  certain  intervals,  say  every  5  or  10  ju/z, 
throughout  the  spectrum  and  the  other  progressing  step  by 
step  and  measuring  each  least  perceptible  difference  in  hue  in 
the  scale.  Fig.  4  shows  the  results  obtained  from  the  latter 
method.  The  greater  the  least  perceptible  difference  the  less 
the  sensibility,  so  the  sensibility  can  be  taken  as  proportional 
to  the  reciprocal  of  the  least  perceptible  differences.  Curve 
A  represents  the  hue  sensibility  curve  obtained  from  the 
reciprocal  of  the  limens  plotted  against  wave-length.  Curve 
B  is  the  scale  reading  curve  obtained  by  integrating  the 
sensibility  curve.  Or  by  taking  least  perceptible  differences 
as  units  the  hue  scale  may  be  determined  by  direct  measure- 
ment and  the  sensibility  curve  obtained  by  differentiating 
the  scale  reading  curve.  Examination  of  these  curves  shows 
maxima  and  minima  at  different  points  in  the  spectrum. 
These  results  agree  very  well  with  previous  results  obtained,2 

1  Jones,  L.  A.,  /.  Opt.  Soc.,  1917,  i,  63. 

1  Steindler,  C.,  Sitzungsber.  Wien.  Acad.  Wiss.,  1906,  115,  i. 


462 


LOYD  A.  JONES  AND  PRENTICE  REEVES 


though,  of  course,  the  final  values  must  be  the  average  results 
from  a  large  number  of  observers  with  normal  vision. 

For  an  exact  determination  of  the  hue  scale,  spectral  light 
must  be  used,  as  the  development  of  transmitting  media  or 
reflecting  surfaces  up  to  the  present  time  has  not  furnished 
either  material  with  monochromatic  properties.  So  an  appa- 
ratus which  will  illuminate  independently  the  two  parts  of  a 
photometric  field  with  monochromatic  light  of  variable 


\ 


7 


400 


70O 


FIG.  4 

quality  and  intensity  must  be  used.  It  is  quite  essential 
that  the  wave-length  in  each  part  be  easily  varied  and  meas- 
ured, and  also  important  that  the  intensity  be  accurately 
controlled.  In  making  a  judgment  of  equality  or  difference 
of  hue  with  two  fields,  it  is  important  to  have  the  intensity 
of  those  fields  balanced  so  that  an  intensity  difference  does 
not  influence  the  hue  judgment.  The  most  satisfactory 
apparatus  used  in  our  laboratory  consisted  of  a  Brace  spectro- 
photometer  used  in  connection  with  a  Hilger  spectroscope 
of  the  constant  deviation  type.  The  number  of  distinct 


PHYSICAL  MEASUREMENT  OF  COLOR 


463 


hues  between  400  /*/*  and  700  /UM  was  found  to  be  128  when  the 
observer  started  at  a  given  point  and  proceeded  step  by 
step  through  the  visible  spectrum.  Several  more  steps  (about 
twenty)  are  added  if  we  examine  the  non-spectral  purples 
and  magentas.  Hue  sensibility  is  nearly  independent  of 
brightness,  although  it  is  found  that  the  sensibility  is  some- 
what higher  for  brightnesses  of  medium  value  than  for  those 
of  extremely  high  and  low  values. 

By  mixing  a  pure  hue  with  white  and  at  the  same  time 
maintaining  a  constant  brightness,  a  series  of  colors  will  be 


I 

^04 

—  •  

1  

PURITY  SCALE 

- 

**-^ 

^< 

^v. 

IMPURITY  °) 
•=.  _ro  w  4 

^ 

N 

x 

\ 

\ 

\ 

)                 20                40                 60                 80                100  WHITE 
X)               80                60                40                20                 0  HUE 

FIG.  5 

obtained  differing  only  in  saturation.  A  specification  of 
saturation,  therefore,  denotes  the  proximity  of  the  color  to  a 
condition  of  monochromatism.  Various  terms  such  as  purity, 
chroma,  and  tint  are  used,  but  the  writers  consider  either 
saturation  or  purity  the  most  suitable.  If  we  start  with  a 
pure  hue  (monochromatic  spectral  light  may  be  considered, 
for  purposes  of  measurement,  as  having  a  saturation  of  100  per 
cent.)  and  proceed  to  a  saturation  of  zero,  we  find  about 
twenty  steps.  Fig.  5  shows  the  purity  scale  with  the  per  cent, 
white  and  the  per  cent,  hue  plotted  as  abscissae  and  the  least 
perceptible  differences  expressed  as  percentages,  as  ordinates. 
At  this  point  it  might  be  well  to  review  some  of  the  factors 


464  LOYD  A.  JONES  AND  PRENTICE  REEVES 

involved  in  determining  the  number  of  visual  sensations  and 
compare  the  use  of  spectral  light  and  physical  controls  with 
the  ordinary  method  of  mixtures  on  a  color  wheel.  In  either 
method  the  number  of  perceptible  differences  we  find  in  a 
hue  scale  or  purity  scale  will  depend  on  the  brightness  region 
we  choose  for  the  hue  scale  and  the  initial  saturation  for  the 
purity  scale.  In  a  suitable  apparatus  using  spectral  light 
we  are  able  to  select  very  narrow  regions  of  the  spectrum  and 
know  accurately  the  region  selected  from  a  direct  reading 
scale.  Spectral  colors  are  saturated.  When  mixing  white 
light  ("white"  in  this  usage  means  any  gray  in  color  mixing) 
we  can  get  a  very  wide  range,  from  the  full  intensity  of  the 
light  source  by  removing  the  Nicol  prisms  to  total  extinction 
when  ihe  elements  are  crossed.  Here  again  the  physical 
specifications  are  easily  obtained  from  a  scale  reading.  For 
the  purposes  of  comparison  it  is  rather  easy  to  obtain  two 
identical  sources  and,  furthermore,  results  obtained  in  one 
laboratory  will  be  directly  comparable  with  those  obtained 
in  any  other  laboratory.  With  the  color  wheel,  however,  we 
first  meet  the  difficulty  of  obtaining  monochromatic  discs 
and  discs  approaching  a  physical  white  or  black.  Then  we 
do  not  know  the  physical  specifications  of  the  mixtures  ob- 
tained from  the  various  proportions  of  the  discs  used.  Discs 
from  the  same  order  may  differ  from  one  another  and  many 
of  them  are  unstable  even  in  darkness.  These  variable 
factors  not  only  preclude  intercomparisons  but  also  make 
separate  results  doubtful  except  for  demonstrations.  In  any 
case  where  discs  are  used  it  would  be  advisable  to  include  in 
published  data  the  physical  specifications  of  the  discs  used. 
Many  text  books  in  psychology  make  the  statement  that 
"yellow  is  distinctly  lighter  than  green;  violet  is  darker  than 
the  other  spectral  hues,"  and  consequently  picture  the  spectral 
belt  in  the  color  pyramid  or  color  spindle  as  being  tilted 
upward  at  the  yellow  region  and  downward  at  the  violet. 
This  type  of  statement  is  true  only  for  certain  spectra.  The 
prismatic  spectrum  of  sunlight  will  certainly  bear  out  these 
statements  but  any  number  of  other  spectra  show  a  different 
set  of  conditions  and  it  is  possible  to  get  equally  bright  yellows 
and  violets.  We  also  find  statements  that  violet  and  blue 


PHYSICAL  MEASUREMENT  OF  COLOR  465 

are  the  most  saturated  colors.  From  a  physical  standpoint 
it  is  possible  to  have  any  color  100  per  cent,  saturated  and 
while  it  is  true  that  100  per  cent,  yellow  is  quite  similar  to 
white,  so,  too,  other  saturated  colors  seem  to  approach  white 
when  the  intensity  of  illumination  is  increased.  In  the  spectra 
ordinarily  used  the  dispersion  and  luminosity  factors  easily 
lead  one  to  the  statements  mentioned  above  but  much  more 
work  must  be  done  with  spectral  regions  of  equal  saturations, 
equal  brightnesses  and  equal  luminosities  before  we  can  be 
positive  as  to  the  form  and  position  of  the  spectral  belt  of  the 
color  pyramid. 

The  Nutting  colorimeter1  is  one  of  the  most  satisfactory 
monochromatic  analyzers,  and  is  especially  adapted  to  the 
determination  of  the  dominant  hue  and  per  cent,  white  of 
reflecting  surfaces  or  transmitting  media.  The  dominant 
hue  is  read  from  a  direct  reading  wave-length  drum  on  a 
screw  which  operates  a  constant  deviation  dispersing  prism. 
This  prism  controls  the  quality  of  the  standard,  the  intensity 
of  which  is  controlled  by  a  pair  of  Nicol  prisms  and  the  purity 
by  mixing  white  light  from  another  source. 

Another  form  of  colorimeter  is  the  trichromatic  analyzer 
which  is  partly  analytical  and  partly  synthetic  in  nature. 
This  method  specifies  a  color  by  giving  the  relative  intensities 
of  some  arbitrary  red,  green,  and  blue  which  when  mixed 
together  match  the  unknown.  The  red,  green,  and  blue  are 
obtained  by  the  use  of  filters  of  glass,  stained  gelatine  or  other 
suitably  colored  material  or  by  the  isolation  of  narrow  bands 
of  the  spectrum.  A  representative  of  this  type  of  instrument 
is  the  Ives  colorimeter.2  Many  other  so-called  colorimeters 
are  in  reality  only  color  comparitors  or  tintometers  and  in 
many  cases  are  based  on  arbitrarily  chosen  standards. 

Although  this  paper  has  been  a  hurried  review  of  some  of 
the  facts  on  color,  it  is  hoped  that  the  importance  of  accurate 
control  of  the  stimulus  in  color  experimentation  has  been 
emphasized.  If  results  are  to  be  duplicated  in  various  labora- 
tories and  colored  stimuli  standardized  some  of  the  afore- 
mentioned facts  must  be  observed. 

1  Bull.  Bur.  Stand.,  1913,  9,  i;   Zsch.  f.  Instkund.,  1913,  33,  2O. 
*/.  Frank.  Inst.,  1907,  164,  421.     Ibid.,  1915,  180,  673. 


SUGGESTIONS  LOOKING  TOWARD  A   FUNDA- 
MENTAL REVISION  OF  CURRENT  STATIS- 
TICAL PROCEDURE,  AS  APPLIED  TO 
TESTS 

BY  SIDNEY  L.  PRESSEY 
University  of  Indiana 

The  past  three  or  four  years  have  been  notable  in  psycho- 
logical history  for  the  remarkable  development  of  statistical 
methods  as  applied  to  the  problems  of  mental  measurement. 
This  advance  is  undoubtedly  of  the  very  greatest  importance. 
The  writer  has  come  to  feel,  however,  that,  with  the  first 
enthusiasm  in  such  work,  there  has  been  a  tendency  toward 
over-elaborateness  and  diffuseness  of  treatment,  and  a  lack 
of  directness  and  incisiveness  in  the  statistical  procedure. 
And  he  wishes  to  point  out  certain  limitations  to  the  present 
concepts  of  "reliability"  and  "validity"  as  applied  to  tests, 
and  certain  objections  to  the  customary  use  of  the  theory 
of  the  normal  curve  in  test  building,  which  he  feels  to  be  of 
distinct  importance. 

The  situation  can  most  readily  be  made  clear  by  a  very 
concrete  example.  Suppose,  then,  that  a  high-school  prin- 
cipal desires  to  give  a  group  test  for  measuring  general  intelli- 
gence to  his  entering  class,  in  order  to  pick  out  in  advance 
those  who  are  likely  to  fail  in  their  freshman  work.  He  has 
a  number  of  scales  under  consideration.  And  he  wishes 
evidence  as  to  the  relative  merits  of  these  scales  for  this 
purpose, — for  the  selection  of  potential  failures.  He  will 
very  likely  be  given  data  with  regard  to  the  comparative 
'reliability'  and  'validity'  of  these  scales;  information  may 
also  be  produced  with  regard  to  the  organization  of  the  tests, 
especially  in  respect  to  the  normality  of  the  distribution  of 
scores  yielded.  The  present  paper  aims  to  show  that  no 
one  of  these  three  sets  of  facts  gives  that  close  contact,  which 
is  desirable,  with  the  practical  problem. 
466 


REVISION  OF  CURRENT  STATISTICAL  PROCEDURE          467 

I.  INADEQUACY  OF  THE  PRESENT  CONCEPT  OF  'RELIABILITY' 
The  principal  may  be  urged  to  use  a  particular  scale 
because  the  scale  has  a  high  'reliability.'  The  exact  meaning 
of  'reliability'  must,  however,  first  be  carefully  looked  into. 
The  meaning  of  the  concept  can  best  be  understood  by  con- 
sidering the  way  in  which  'reliability'  is  usually  measured. 
The  most  common  method  is  simply  to  give  two  duplicate 
forms  of  the  same  test,  one  after  the  other,  to  the  same  sub- 
jects. The  ratings  obtained  by  the  subjects  on  'Form  A* 
and  'Form  B'  are  then  correlated.  And  the  closeness  of  the 
correlation  indicates  the  reliability  of  the  test. 

The  significance,  and  the  limitations,  of  a  measure  thus 
obtained  are  fairly  obvious.  Two  such  limitations  are  espe- 
cially important,  (a)  The  measure  is  evidently  a  measure 
of  the  reliability  of  the  sampling, — of  the  particular  type  of 
performance  involved  in  the  test.  When  one  speaks  of  the 
reliability  of  an  instrument,  one  naturally  thinks  of  its  reli- 
ability/or some  purpose.  Such  a  connotation  must  be  guarded 
against  here.  One  must  not  come  insensibly  to  think  of  the 
reliability  coefficient  of  a  test  of  intelligence,  for  instance,  as 
indicating  the  value  of  the  test,  as  a  measure  of  intelligence. 
Such  a  conclusion  is  sound  only  if  a  test  is  a  simple  sampling 
of  the  ability  which  it  is  sought  to  measure;  and  this  happens 
much  more  rarely  than  might  be  supposed.1  The  term  'con- 
sistency' would,  therefore,  seem  a  more  accurate  term;  the 
'reliability'  coefficient  indicates  only  the  extent  to  which  a 
test  is  consistent  with  itself.  And  it  is  entirely  possible  that 
a  test  should  yield  highly  consistent  results  which  were, 
nevertheless,  not  at  all  measures  of  the  function  which  it  was 
desired  to  measure.2 

1  It  might  seem,  for  instance,  that  the  Courtis  Scale  B  was  a  simple  sampling  of 
ability  in  the  fundamentals.     But  recent  research  has  shown  the  situation  to  be  by  no 
means  so  simple.     (See  Thorndike,  E.  L.,  and  Courtis,  S.  A.,  'Correction  Formulae 
for  Addition  Tests,'  Teachers'  College  Record,  1920,  at,  1-24.) 

2  Thus,  not  so  many  years  ago,  cancellation  tests  were  frequently  included  in 
'batteries'  of  tests  intended  for  the  measurement  of  mental  endowment.     (See,  for 
instance,  Pyle,  "The  Examination  of  School  Children,'  Macmillan,  1913.)     It  now 
seems  quite  clear  that  cancellation  tests  are  not  good  tests  of  intelligence.     (See  McCall, 
'  Some  Correlations  between  Mental  Traits,'  Teachers'  College,  1916.)    But  cancellation 
tests  appear  to  be  quite  'reliable'  measures, — they  are  simply  not  good  tests  of  general 
intelligence.     They  are,  therefore,  not  'reliable'  for  the  purpose  for  which  Pyle  used 
them. 


468  SIDNEY  L.  PRESSEY 

It  must  also  be  kept  in  mind  (b)  that  such  a  measure  of  the 
reliability  of  the  sampling  may  be  considered  an  adequate 
measure  for  this  purpose  only  if  the  scores  obtained  on  '  Form 
A'  and  'Form  B'  may  be  considered  entirely  random  sam- 
plings of  performance  on  such  a  test.  Usually  they  cannot  be 
so  considered.  There  may  be  an  initial  difficulty  with  direc- 
tions at  the  beginning  of  'Form  A'  and  a  slight  fatigue 
toward  the  last  of  'Form  B.'  What  is,  with  many  of  the 
tests,  more  important — the  method  as  described  above  tells 
us  nothing  whatever  about  the  'consistency'  of  the  results 
from  one  examiner  to  another,  one  scorer  to  another,  from 
one  day  to  another,  or  one  time  of  the  day  to  another. 

To  come  back  to  the  original  problem,  then:  such  a  meas- 
ure of  the  consistency  of  the  test  with  itself,  under  certain 
circumstances,  tells  the  high  school  principal  surprisingly 
little  as  to  the  value  which  that  test  may  have  in  distinguish- 
ing his  potential  failures  from  the  rest  of  their  class.1  And 
information  with  regard  to  the  'validity'  of  the  scale  is 
naturally  turned  to,  to  settle  this  practical  question. 

II.  THE  ARTIFICIAL  NATURE  OF  CURRENT  CONCEPTS 
REGARDING  VALIDITY 

The  principal  is,  then,  urged  to  use  a  particular  scale 
because  the  scale  has  a  high  'validity'  as  a  measure  of  general 
ability.  That  is,  data  are  presented  showing  that  the  scale 
gives  results  having  a  high  correlation  with  independent 
criteria  as  to  general  intelligence,  and  congruence  with  current 
theories  regarding  the  nature  of  general  intelligence, — there 

1  The  writer  is  inclined  to  feel  that  most  problems  of  consistency  can  best  be  dealt 
with  in  general  terms.  That  is,  what  difference,  in  general,  may  one  expect  in  test 
results  if  one  tests  Monday  instead  of  Friday,  at  9  o'clock  instead  of  3  o'clock?  What 
difference,  in  general,  may  be  expected,  with  a  given  type  of  directions,  from  one 
examiner  to  another?  What  differences,  with  various  scoring  methods,  may  be 
expected  from  one  scorer  to  another?  What  differences  may  result  in  the  score  of  an 
individual  as  the  result  of  fluctuations  from  one  time  to  another,  in  general  feeling 
tone,  energy,  vigor,  health?  The  writer  believes  that,  until  evidence  to  the  contrary 
appears,  it  may  be  taken  for  granted  that  such  factors  affect  all  tests  in-  more  or  less 
the  same  way;  certain  general  theorems  with  regard  to  their  operation  should,  then, 
be  possible — or  general  precautions  taken.  The  only  problem  of  consistency  that 
needs  specific  determination  for  each  test  would  then  be  consistency  as  it  relates  to  the 
subject  matter  of  the  test. 


REVISION  OF  CURRENT  STATISTICAL  PROCEDURE          469 

is  a  regular  rise  in  score  from  year  to  year  until  maturity, 
a  relative  freedom  from  the  influence  of  specific  training,  and 
so  on.  This  concept  of  'validity'  is  also,  the  writer  feels, 
beside  the  point,  if  not  misleading,  so  far  as  the  practical 
problem  of  the  high-school  principal  is  concerned.  And  again 
there  are  two  difficulties. 

In  the  first  place  (a),  since  the  extent  to  which  general 
intelligence  is  the  fundamental  factor,  in  conditioning  success 
and  failure  in  the  Freshman  year  of  high  school,  is  not  known, 
the  usefulness  of  the  scale  (even  if  proven  a  satisfactory 
measure  of  general  intelligence)  is  still  an  unknown  quantity. 
Stability  of  character,  willingness  to  apply  oneself  even 
though  the  restraints  of  grammar  school  supervision  are  now 
removed,  interest  in  the  more  mature  subjects  of  the  high- 
school  curriculum — such  elements  are  probably  more  im- 
portant than  is  often  supposed,  in  the  total  situation.1 
Differences  in  the  adequacy  of  previous  preparation  may  also 
be  of  importance.  So  proof  of  the  'validity'  of  a  scale  as  a 
measure  of  'general  intelligence'  is  by  no  means  proof  of  the 
value  of  the  scale  in  sorting  out  potential  failures  among  these 
high-school  freshmen.  In  fact,  it  might  almost  be  said  that 
in  proportion  as  the  scale  measured  one  element  only,  in  a 
complex  situation,  to  just  that  extent  was  the  scale  inadequate 
for  dealing  with  that  total  situation!2 

It  remains  to  be  pointed  out,  however,  that  even  though 

1  For  a  discussion  of  this  tendency  to  overestimate  the  comparative  importance 
of  intelligence  see  Rosenow,  Curt,  'Is  Lack  of  Intelligence  the  Chief  Cause  of  Delin- 
quency?' PSYCHOL.  REV.,  March,  1920. 

2  The  more  extreme  theories  in  regard  to  general  intelligence  surely  make  up,  in 
the  aggregate,  an  extraordinary  concept.    It  should  surely  be  kept  in  mind  that  it  is, 
in  the  first  place,  an  analytical  concept  and  so  dependent  for  its  character  upon  the 
methods  of  analysis  employed.     It  should  also  be  pointed  out  that  such  a  concept 
naturally  receives  successive  accretions  in  the  way  of  theory  and  may,  by  a  mental 
synthesis  largely  adventitious  to  the  facts,  acquire  a  reality  which  is  very  largely  an 
artifact.     Scores  on  various  tests  are  lumped  and  the  aggregate  used  as  a  measure  of 
general  ability.    A  more  or  less  close  relationship  is  naturally  found  between  such  an 
aggregate  and  the  average  marks  of  the  children  in  school.    Teachers,  especially  in  the 
grades,  naturally  think  of  the  child's  work  as  a  whole,  and  give  marks  showing  high 
correlations  between  abilities  in  different  subjects.    And  the  children  come  to  this 
attitude  and  react  to  their  school  work  as  a  whole.    And — the  whole  situation  is 
cumulative.     One  might,  in  fact,  imagine  the  concept  of  general  ability  thus  developing 
even  though  abilties  were,  as  a  matter  of  fact,  diverse  and  uncorrelated. 


470  SIDNEY  L.  PRESSEY 

the  demonstration  of  a  close  correlation  between  the  scale  in 
question  and  a  general  intelligence  were  supplemented  by 
evidence  that  general  intelligence  was  the  fundamental  factor 
in  the  situation,  still  the  suitableness  of  the  scale  for  the 
particular  problem  would  remain  to  be  shown.  That  is, 
(&)  the  usual  method  for  stating  relationships  between  two 
variables — the  correlation  coefficient — does  not  express  satis- 
factorily the  nature  of  that  relationship,  for  diagnostic  pur- 
poses, at  a  particular  point  in  the  distribution.  The  problem 
is:  How  unmistakably  will  the  scale  set  off  the  lower  15  per 
cent,  or  so  in  scholastic  ability?  A  correlation  coefficient  is 
only  very  general  evidence  in  regard  to  this  particular  matter.1 
And  it  is  evidence  with  regard  to  such  diagnostic  efficiency 
that  the  school  principal  should  require. 

III.   THE  IRRELEVANCY  OF  THE  THEORY  OF  THE  NORMAL 
CURVE  IN  PRACTICAL  PROBLEMS  IN  CLASSIFICATION 

/ 

Proof  of  the  validity  of  a  scale  as  a  measure  of  general 
intelligence  is,  then,  not  proof  of  the  value  of  that  scale  for 
sorting  out  potential  high-school  failures,  since  failure  is  not 
conditioned  by  general  ability  alone,  and  since  the  diagnostic 
efficiency  of  a  measuring  instrument  is  not  the  same  thing 
as  the  general  relationship  of  that  instrument  to  the  factor 
concerned.  A  third  set  of  facts  may,  nevertheless  be  intro- 
duced in  evidence  of  the  value  of  the  scale  in  question.  It 
may  be  pointed  out  that  the  tests  of  the  scale  are  very  care- 
fully constructed  so  that  equal  increments  on  the  scale 
represent  equal  increments  in  ability,  and  so  that  the  total 
distribution  of  abilities  yielded  is  closely  similar  to  the  dis- 
tribution of  abilities  that  would  be  expected  according  to 

1  See,  for  instance/Thurstone,  L.  L.,  'Mental  Tests  for  College  Entrance,'  /.  of 
Educ.  Psychol.,  March,  1919  and  Pressey,  S.  L.,  'Suggestions  with  Regard  to  Prof. 
Thurstone's  "Method  of  Critical  Scores," '  /.  of  Educ.  Psychol.,  December,  1919. 

The  writer  has  often  wondered  whether  the  early  introduction  of  the  Pearson 
products-moments  formula  for  calculating  the  correlation  coefficient  has  not  hindered 
rather  than  helped  the  study  of  relationships,  in  psychology.  There  are,  of  course, 
no  right  and  wrong  methods;  methods  are  simply  more  or  less  adequate  to  the  data 
and  the  problem  in  hand.  One  could  almost  say,  dogmatically,  that  the  particular 
type  of  data  and  problem  to  which  the  Pearson  method  is  applicable  were  relatively 
rare.  Most  practical  problems  require  a  two  or  threefold  division. 


REVISION  OF  CURRENT  STATISTICAL  PROCEDURE          47* 

the  theory  of  the  'normal  curve.'  Once  more  the  writer 
would  object  to  the  relevancy  of  the  information  to  the 
practical  problem,  and  on  two  counts. 

(a)  Construction  of  the  scale  so  that  equal  increments  of 
ability  are  related  to  equal  increments  in  score  means, 
probably,  transmutation  of  values  in  terms  of  the  per  cent, 
passing  different  items  into  positions  on  the  normal  curve  or 
some  such  procedure.1  It  need  only  be  said  here  that  items 
which  give  a  satisfactory  scaling  on  such  a  curve  need  by  no 
means  be  the  most  diagnostic  items.  An  item  may  appear 
in  a  test  because  it  is  the  only  item  appearing  at  1.52  P.E. 
(when  scaled  as  mentioned  above)  or  it  may  appear  in  a  test 
because  most  of  the  potential  failures  cannot  pass  it  and  most 
potential  successes  can.  The  last  criterion  is  obviously  the 
fundamental  one  if  the  problem  in  hand  is  to  obtain  a  test  that 
shall  most  completely  differentiate  the  potential  failures. 

(&)  It  may  also  be  pointed  out  shortly  that  for  the  par- 
ticular practical  problem  under  consideration  a  normal  dis- 
tribution of  scores  is  hardly  to  be  desired.  If  a  scale  sets  off 
the  potential  failures  very  completely,  it  will  lump  the  assured 
failures  at  the  bottom  and  the  assured  successes  at  the  top, 
and  spread  out  the  questionable  cases  in  between.  In  short, 
equal  increments  of  ability  and  a  normal  distribution  of  scores 
are  not  to  be  desired  if  the  greatest  efficiency,  for  the  practical 
problem  postulated,  is  sought. 

IV.   DISCUSSION 

Well — most  of  these  points  seem  obvious  enough,  perhaps. 
But  the  concept  back  of  them  indicates  a  fundamentally 
different  statistical  attack,  in  the  development  and  use  of 
tests.  If  differentiation  of  the  potential  failures  in  high  school 
is  an  important  problem,  why  not  build  a  scale  specifically 
for  that  purpose?  Select  items  simply  according  to  their 
ability  to  make  the  desired  division.  Combine  those  items 
so  that  such  a  lumping  of  cases  at  the  two  extremes  is  ob- 
tained; the  reverse  of  the  normal  distribution  is  the  distribu- 

1  Of  which  procedures,  transmutation  of  percents  passing  at  different  chrono- 
logical ages  into  supposed  units  of  mental  growth  is  surely  more  questionable  still. 


472  SIDNEY  L.  PRESSEY 

tion  to  be  desired.1  Then  measure  the  value  of  the  test  by 
measuring  its  'efficiency'  in  dealing  with  the  practical  problem 
for  which  the  scale  has  been  designed.  Deal  with  each 
important  problem  in  some  such  empirical  and  concrete 
fashion.  And,  if,  out  of  a  large  number  of  such  attempts, 
there  emerge  certain  unitary  factors, — a  general  ability,  a 
series  of  character  types,  or  what  not, — well  and  good.  But 
the  postulation  of  such  elements  in  advance,  with  verification 
primarily  by  reference  back  to  these  postulates,  is  both  an 
unscientific  and  a  practically  dangerous  proceeding. 

First  a  very  specific  problem;  then,  after  that — everything 
subservient  to  the  solution  of  it!  Every  item  chosen  with 
reference  to  that  one  problem,  every  method  aiming  only  at 
the  most  direct  and  empirical  solution  of  that  problem — no 
hypotheses,  as  thoroughly  empirical  treatment  as  may  be! 
The  result  will  be,  the  writer  believes,  an  essentially  new 
statistical  approach  (methods  now  in  use  suggest  something 
of  this  sort,  particularly  the  methods  used  in  the  development 
of  the  army  trade  tests).  Such  a  revision  of  methods  is,  the 
wrker  has  come  to  feel,  necessary,  for  a  clarifying  of  the 
total  situation.2 

1  Is  this  not  really  the  solution  of  the  problem  of  the  normal  curve  in  mental 
measurement?  (See,  for  instance,  Boring,  Amer.  J.  of  Psychol.,  January,  1920). 
The  actual  distribution  of  various  traits  is  a  matter  of  academic  interest  only.  But 
meantime,  the  distribution  to  be  sought  in  test  work  will  be  determined  by  the  problem. 

2 And  now  the  apology!  There  is  little  essentially  new  in  the  paper,  of  course. 
(In  fact,  it  should  be  said  that  a  detailed  discussion,  with  full  use  of  the  literature, 
was  first  attempted,  but  was  found  to  extend  beyond  reasonable  limits.)  The  im- 
portant thing,  however,  is  the  total  implication  of  the  various  points  presented.  Our 
statistical  methods  as  applied  to  tests  have  been  largely  borrowed  methods, — and 
methods  borrowed  from  the  descriptive  sciences.  So  the  question  has  been:  What  is 
the  test  measuring,  and  how  accurately  is  this  thing  being  measured?  But  mental 
testing  is  not  a  descriptive,  but  a  technical  science.  And  the  question  should  be, 
instead:  What  are  we  trying  to  do,  and  how  well  are  we  doing  it?  The  distinction  is, 
the  writer  believes,  of  the  very  most  fundamental  importance,  involving  fundamental 
differences  in  statistical  approach. 

It  remains  to  be  mentioned  that  the  points  made  apply  equally  to  measures  of 
achievement  in  the  school  subjects  or  other  like  tests.  Instead  of  measuring  "  ability  in 
arithmetic  "  in  the  eighth  grade — and  then  commenting  mildly  on  the  extent  to  which 
arithmetical  ability  in  the  eighth  grade  overlaps  on  the  seventh,  why  not  tackle  a  defi- 
nite practical  problem, — attempt  to  define  the  passing  point  in  arithmetic  for  the 
eighth  grade?  The  distribution,  again,  should  be  bi-modal,  not  normal, — and  the 
other  points  mentioned  follow. 


BF 
1 

P7 
v.27 


Psychological  review 


For  use  in 

the  Library 

ONLY 


PLEASE  DO  NOT  REMOVE 
SLIPS  FROM  THIS  POCKET 


UNIVERSITY  OF  TORONTO 
LIBRARY