Skip to main content

Full text of "The Quarterly journal of the New York State Historical Association"

See other formats


Class,  fuib. 
Book  AtLS- 


n4  ^ 


W 


.^ 


The 


Quarterly  Journal 


of  the 


/ 


New  York  State  Historical 
Association 


Volume  III 


January  1922 


Number  1 


Entered  as  second  class  mail  matter  October  22,    1919,  at  the  Post  Office  at   Albany,  New  York 
under  the  Act  of  August  24,  1912. 


■  NSG6 


NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION 
Quarterly  Journal 

Editorial  Committee 

JAMES  SULLIVAN,  Managing  Editor 

DIXON  R.  FOX  FREDERICK  B.  RICHARDS 


CONTENTS 

MEETING  OF  THE  NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIA- 
TION      1 

HISTORIC  SPOTS  NEAR  LAKE  GEORGE     Frederick  B.  Richards        21 

PRESENTATION  OF  AN  INDIAN  STATUE 

-----         George  D.  Pratt,  Dixon  Ryan  Fox         30 

THE  BATTLE  OF  DIAMOND  ISLAND      -         -        -  Peter  Nelson         3^ 
REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS 54 

Folwell,  History  of  Minnesota;     Burnett,  Letters  of  the  Continental 

Congress; ,  History  of  the  306th  Field  Artillery;    , 

The  Story  of  Battery  B,  306th  Field  Artillery;  Patmore,    Monroe  in 
the  World  War. 

NOTES  AND  QUERIES 58 


Snbscription  Price  $1.50  Single  Numbers  40  cents 

Address  all  contributions  and  communications  to 
New  York  State  Historical  Association,  Albany. 


o 


X    3 


VOL.  III.  JANUARY  1922  NO.  1. 


1  he  \/uarterly  J  ournal 

of  the  New  York  State  Historical  Association 

MEETING  OF  THE  NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTOR- 
ICAL ASSOCIATION  AT  LAKE  GEORGE 

The  twenty-second  annual  meeting  of  the  New  York  State 
Historical  Association  was  opened  Monday  evening,  October  3, 
1921,  at  the  Fort  William  Henry  Hotel  and  closed  on  October  5. 
About  two  hundred  delegates  from  all  parts  of  the  State  were 
present.  Vice-President  Gilbert  D.  B.  Hasbrouck  presided  in  the 
absence  of  President  George  A.  Blauvelt,  who  had  not  sufficiently 
recovered  from  a  long  illness  to  enable  him  to  be  at  the  meeting. 
The  Rev.  Dr.  William  M.  Beauchamp  of  S3^racuse  opened  the 
sessions  with  prayer  and  Mr.  Elmer  J.  West  of  Glens  Falls  wel- 
comed the  delegates  to  Lake  George  and  vicinity.  Dr.  Frank 
H.  Severance  made  the  response  and  Judge  Hasbrouck  then 
introduced  the  first  speaker  of  the  evening.  The  program  which 
follows  was  carried  out  in  all  details  with  the  exception  of  the 
paper  by  Dr.  Beauchamp,  which  he  chose  not  to  deliver,  and  the 
paper  on  conservation  which  was  delivered  by  Mr.  William  G. 
Howard  in  the  absence  of  Mr.  Pettis. 

Like  many  previous  meetings,  this  was  reported  to  be  "the 
best  ever."  The  automobile  trip  on  Tuesday  afternoon,  a  de- 
tailed itinerary  of  which  is  published  herewith,  was  one  of  great 
profit  to  all  members  interested  in  history.  The  same  may  be 
said  of  the  trip  by  boat  and  automobile  to  Fort  Ticonderoga  on 
Wednesday  morning.  At  the  fort  itself  Mr.  Pell  entertained  the 
members  after  a  style  which  reminded  one  of  the  welcomes  which 
were  given  to  guests  in  the  period  to  the  history  of  which  the 
meeting  was  largely  devoted. 

Miss  Pitcher's  paper  of  the  first  evening  had  given  a  splendid 
word  picture  of  the  entire  region,  beginning  w4th  Champlain's 
discovery  in  1609,  and  closing  with  Burgoyne's  surrender  in  1777, 
so  that  the  m.embers  were  well  prepared  to  enjoy  the  historic  and 
literary  associations  of  the  locality. 


2      NEW  YORK  ST  A  TE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIA  TION 

For  the  whole  stay  at  the  Fort  William  Henry  Hotel,  the  Dela- 
ware and  Hudson  Company  did  everything  for  the  comfort  of  the 
guests.  The  Chepontuc  Chapter  of  the  D.  A.  R.  at  Glens  Falls 
and  the  Ticonderoga  Chapter  of  the  same  society  at  Ticonderoga , 
exerted  themselves  to  make  the  meeting  a  success.  Proper  and 
appropriate  mention  of  all  of  these  efforts  by  the  local  societies 
and  organizations  is  given  in  the  minutes  of  the  association  which 
follow. 

To  no  one  in  the  association  is  greater  debt  due  for  the  great 
success  of  the  meeting  than  to  Mr.  F.  B.  Richards,  its  enthusiastic 
and  devoted  secretary.  The  program  of  papers  at  the  sessions 
was  largely  arranged  for  by  the  program  committee,  consisting  of 
President  Blauvelt,   Dr.   Fox,   Dr.   Sullivan  and  Mr.  Richards. 

Program 

First  Session 

Monday  evening,  October  3,  8:30  to  10:30 

Invocation,  Rev.  William  Martin  Beauchamp,  S.  T.  D.,  Syracuse. 

Address  of  Welcome,  Mr.  Elmer  J.  West,  Glens  Falls. 

Response,  Frank  H.  Severance,  L.  H.  D.,  second  vice-president, 
Buffalo. 

Address,  "Our  Canadian-American  Relations,"  R.  Bruce 
Taylor,  D.  D.,  president  of  Queens  University,  Kingston,  Ontario. 

Address,  "An  Historical  Pilgrimage  in  the  Champlain  Valley," 
Mrs.  Charlotte  A.  Pitcher,  Utica. 

Address,  "Conservation  in  New  York  State,"  Mr.  C.  R.  Pettis, 
State  Superintendent  of  Forests,  Albany. 

Second  Session 

Business  Meeting 

Tuesday  morning,  October  4,  8:30  to  10 

Third  Session 

Tuesday  morning,  October  4,  10  to  12:30. 

Address,  "Women  of  New  York  State  in  the  Revolution," 
Miss  Amelia  Day  Campbell,  New  York  City. 

Address,  "The  Battle  of  Diamond  Island,"  Peter  Nelson,  A.  B., 
Albany. 

Address,  "Japan,"  Poultney  Bigelow,  A.  M.,  Malden-on- 
Hudson. 


LAKE  GEORGE  MEETING  3 

Fourth  Session 
Lake  George  Battleground  Park. 

Tuesday  afternoon,  October  4,  2:15. 

Address,  Presentation  of  an  Indian  Statue,  the  gift  to  the 
Association  by  Hon.  George  D.  Pratt,  Frederic  B.  Pratt,  L.L.D., 
Brooklyn. 

Address,  Acceptance  on  behalf  of  the  Association,  Dixon  Ryan 
Fox,  Ph.  D.,  New  York. 

NOTE:  After  these  exercises  an  automobile  trip  will  be  taken 
to  the  historic  spots  in  the  neighborhood.     See  special  circular. 

Fifth  Session 

Tuesday  evening,  October  4,  8:30  to  10:30. 

Address,  "Great  Founders  of  the  Iroquois  League,"  Rev. 
William  Martin  Beauchamp.  S.  T.  D. 

Address,  "Regulation  of  Public  Service  Corporations  in  New 
York,"  Hon.  Martin  S.  Decker,  Albany. 

Address,  "The  Administration  of  Land  Companies  with  Special 
Reference  to  the  Pulteney  Estate,"  Paul  D.  Evans,  Ph.  D., 
Syracuse. 

Discussion,  Frank  H.  Severance,  L.  H.  D.,  Buffalo. 

Address,  "What  State  Historical  Associations  Can  Do,"  Augus- 
tus H.  Shearer,  Ph.  D.,  Buffalo. 

Discussion,  James  Sullivan,  Ph.  D.,  Albany. 

Sixth  Session 
Fort  Ticonderoga 
Wednesday  afternoon,  October  5,  1:00. 

Note:  Fort  Ticonderoga  is  to  be  reached  on  Wednesday 
forenoon,  either  by  auto  or  by  boat.  See  the  printed  letter  sent 
out  by  Secretary  Richards,  September  15. 

Address  of  Welcome,   Mr.  Stephen  H.   P.  Pell,  Ticonderoga. 
Address,    "Fort    Ticonderoga,"    Miss    Helen    Ives    Gilchrist, 
M.  A.,  New  York  City. 

Business  Meeting 
Minutes 
The  business  meeting  of  the  New  York  State  Historical  Associa- 
tion was  held  in  the  Grill  Room  of  the  Fort  William  Henry  Hotel, 
Tuesday  morning,  October  4,  1921. 


4        NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION 

In  the  unavoidable  absence  of  our  President,  George  A.  Blauvelt, 
the  meeting  was  called  to  order  by  Gilbert  D.  B.  Hasbrouck, 
First  Vice-President. 

Upon  motion,  it  was  Resolved  that  the  reading  of  the  minutes 
of  the  previous  meeting  be  dispensed  with. 

The  Treasurer  read  the  following  report: — (See  Report). 

Upon  motion,  it  was  Resolved  that  the  Treasurer's  report  be 
accepted  and  placed  on  file. 

The  Secretary  presented  the  names  of  the  new  members  who 
had  joined  the  Association  since  the  last  annual  meeting  :^ — (See 
List). 

Upon  motion,  it  was  Resolved  that  the  election  of  these  members 
received  by  action  of  the  Executive  Committee,  be  confirmed. 

Stewart  MacFarland  presented  the  following  report  for  Lake 
George  Battleground  Park: — (See  Report). 

The  Secretary  made  a  verbal  report  for  the  Crown  Point  Reser- 
vation, stating  in  brief  that  it  was  in  its  usual  state  of  well-being, 
that  it  was  being  well  taken  care  of  by  its  committee  and  its  very 
efficient  caretaker,  and  was  visited  by  thousands  of  people  every 
season. 

James  A.  Beckett  made  the  following  report  for  the  Ben- 
nington Battlefield:- — (See  Report). 

Dr.  Sullivan  made  the  following  report  as  Chairman  of  the 
Committee  on  printing  of  the  Proceedings: — (See  Report). 

Upon  motion,  it  was  Resolved  that  a  committee  be  appointed 
by  the  President  to  consider  the  question  of  increasing  the  annual 
dues  of  the  Association. 

Dr.  Sullivan  presented  the  following  resolution  on  the  death  of 
our  late  First  Vice-President,  Charles  Mason  Dow,  LL.D.: — 
(See  Resolution). 

Under  the  head  of  the  election  of  Trustees,  the  following  were 
elected  for  a  term  of  three  3'ears:  DeAlva  S.  Alexander,  Buffalo; 
George  A.  Blauvelt,  Monsey;  William  A.  E.  Cimimings,  Glens 


LAKE  GEORGE  MEETING  5 

Falls;  Stuwesant  Fish,  Garrison;  Charles  Henry  Hull,  Ithaca; 
George  D.  Pratt,  Brooklyn;  vStewart  MacFarland,  Glens  Falls; 
and  Martin  S.  Decker,  Albany. 

Miss  M.  R.  Smith  of  Newburgh  offered  the  following  resolution; 

Whereas,  The  Historical  Society  of  Newburgh  and  the  High- 
lands has  been  informed  that  the  State  intends  in  a  very  short 
time  to  destroy  the  house  which  was  the  scene  of  negotiations 
between  Benedict  Arnold  and  Major  Andre,  for  the  purpose  of 
beautifying  the  landscape  and  lawn  of  a  State  Institution  for 
Feeble  Minded  Children,  and 

Whereas,  So  important  a  landmark  of  our  Revolutionary  history 
should  be  preserved  as  a  memento  of  our  vigilance  and  courage 
in  preventing  the  consummation  of  such  a  deed,  by  which  the 
successful  ending  of  the  war  was  accomplished,  therefore,  be  it 

Resolved,  That  the  New  York  State  Historical  Association 
appoint  a  committee  to  confer  with  the  Governor  of  the  State  of 
New  York  or  whoever  is  in  authority  in  the  matter,  and  request 
that  the  State  postpone  the  destruction  of  the  Smith  House. 

Upon  motion,  it  was  adopted  and  referred  to  the  Committee  on 
Marking  Historic  Spots. 

Joseph  Beal  of  Albany  then  called  the  attention  of  the  meeting 
to  the  neglect  of  Saratoga  Battlefield  and  presented  the  following 
Resolution : 

Whereas,  Senator  Wm.  M.  Calder  has  introduced  in  the 
United  States  Senate,  Senate  Bill  No.  2,351  with  a  view  to  the 
acquisition  of  the  Saratoga  battlefield  for  its  preservation  for 
historical  and  other  purposes;  and 

Whereas,  Representative  James  S.  Parker  has  introduced  an 
identical   bill   in  the  House  of  Representatives;  now  therefore 

Resolved,  That  this  Association  thanks  Senator  Calder  and 
Congressman  Parker  for  introducing  this  measure  and  requests 
them  to  use  every  honorable  means  for  its  passage; 

Resolved  further,  That  this  Association  hereby  petitions  Congress 
for  the  speedy  enactment  of  the  bill  into  law; 

Resolved  further.  That  this  Association  asks  the  Daughters  of  the 
American   Revolution,   the   Sons  of  the  America:!   Revolution, 


6     NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION 

also  all  historical  associations  and  all  other  patriotic  organizations 
in  America  and  the  American  people  generally  to  cooperate  in 
tirging  favorable  action  on  the  Bill. 

This  resolution  was  seconded  by  Mr.  Brown  and  carried. 

Upon  motion,  the  following  resolution  was  adopted: 

Whereas,  The  officials  of  the  Delaware  and  Hudson  Company, 
from  the  President  to  Mr.  KJnuckey,  the  chief  clerk  at  the  Fort 
William  Henry  Hotel,  the  Chepontuc  Chapter  of  the  Daughters 
of  the  American  Revolution  at  Glens  Falls,  the  Ticonderoga 
Chapter  of  the  Daughters  of  the  American  Revolution  at  Ticon- 
deroga, and  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Stephen  H.  P.  Pell,  have  by  their  efforts 
so  largely  contributed  to  the  pleasure  and  success  of  this  22d 
meeting  of  the  New  York  State  Historical  Association,   be  it 

Resolved,  That  this  association  express  to  them  through  its  secre- 
tary' its  heartiest  thanks  for  their  hospitality. 

Stewart  MacFarland  and  Mr.  Walbridge  then  called  the  at- 
tention of  the  meeting  to  efforts  which  were  already  being  put 
forth  to  acquire  the  Saratoga  Battlefield  by  a  holding  company 
or  society  so  as  to  preserve  the  same  intact  until  it  could  be  ac- 
quired by  the  State  or  Nation. 

Upon  motion  it  was  Resolved  that  we  approve  the  forming  a  of 
local  body  or  society  to  acquire  and  hold  the  Saratoga  Battlefield 
until  proper  legislation  could  be  secured. 

Upon  motion,  the  meeting  adjourned. 

Frederick  B.  Richards, 

Secretary. 

Trustees  Meeting 

Minutes 

At  the  conclusion  of  the  literary  exercises  Tuesday  morning, 
October  4,  the  meeting  of  the  Trustees  of  the  [New  York  State 
Historical  Association  was  called  to  order. 

Present — Messrs.  Hasbrouck,  Sullivan,  Vrooman,  Dann,  Wil- 
liams, Fox,  Riggs,  Richards,  and  Mrs.  Pitcher  and  Miss  Haldane. 

Upon  motion,  it  was  Resolved  that  the  following  officers  for  the 
coming  year  be  duly  elected : 


LAKE  GEORGE  MEETING  7 

Hon.  Gilbert  D.  B.  Hasbrouck,  president;  Frank  H.  Severance, 
L.  H.  D.,  first  vice-president;  James  G.  Riggs,  Ph.  D.,  second 
vice-president;  James  Sullivan,  Ph.  D.,  corresponding  secretary; 
Frederick  B.  Richards,  recording  secretary  and  treasurer. 

Upon  motion,  the  meeting  adjourned. 

Frederick  B.  Richards, 

Secretary 

Financial  Statement 

October  4,  1920  to  October  1,  1921 

Receipts 

Cash  on  hand,  October  4,  1920 $2,571.89 

Received  from  Annual  Dues 1,968.85 

"         "       Interest  on  Investments..  .  .         105.12 


$4,645.86 


Disbursements 

Proceedings $1,671.61 

Magazines 694.91 

Expense 616.78 


$2,983.30 


Cash  on  hand,  October  1,  1921 $1,662.56 

Liabilities 
None 

LIFE  membership  FUND 

Receipts 

Cash  on  hand,  October  4,  1920 $229.96 

New  Members 682.44 

Interest 87.15 

$999.55 


8     NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION 

Disbursements 

War  Savings  Stamps 50.00 

5  Liberty  Loan  Bonds  par  $1,000 885.85 

935.85 

Balance  on  hand,  October  1,  1921 $63.70 

INVESTMENT  ACCOUNT 

Huntington  Land  &  Imp.  Co.  Bonds $200.00 

United  Kingdon  of  Great  Britain  &  Ireland  1,000.00 

1st  Liberty  Loan  Converted 100.00 

2nd  "             "               "  150.00 

4th  "             "                 "   1,100.00 

5th  "             "                 "    150.00 

War  Savings  Stamps 205.00 

Total $2,905.00 

STATE  PARKS 

Receipts 

From  New  York  State  Comptroller,  since  Oct.  4,  1920     $4,937.15 

Disbursements 

Crown  Point  Reservation $2,219.50 

Lake  George  Battleground  Park 2,717.65 

$4,937.15 


LAKE  GEORGE  MEETING 


New  Members 

October  8,  1920  to  October  1,  1921 

Life  Members — New 


Campbell,  Miss  Amelia  Day 
Jewett,  Rutger  Bleecker 
Liddle,   Mrs.   Harriet  E. 
Fox,  Hon.  Noel  Bleecker 
Kendrick,  Ashley  W. 
Knox,  Mrs.  Charles  B. 
Manning,  Hon.  James  H. 
Pratt,  Hon.  George  D.,  A.  M. 
Riley,  Major  John  L.  A.  M. 


170  West  74th  St.,  New  York 

789  Madison  Ave.,  New  York 

210   Union  St.,   Schenectady 

150  Nassau  St.,  New  York 

19  Marion  Place.,  Saratoga  Springs 

104  Second  Ave.,  Johnstown 

409  State  St.,  Albany 

c/o  Pratt  Institute,  Brooklyn 

Education  Building,  Albany 


Life  Members — Transferred  from  Annual 


de  Laporte,  Mrs.  Theo. 
Derby,  Hon.  John  H. 
Dunn,  Dr.  Joseph  H. 
Famham,  Mrs.  George  A. 
Fordham,  Herbert  L. 
Foulds,  Dr.  Thos.  H. 
Gilbert,  Mrs.  J.  J. 
Gray,  Niel,  Jr. 
Hull,  Philip  M. 
Keller,  Mrs.  Delight  E.  R. 
Knapp,  George  O. 
Liddle,  Henry  S.,  M.  D. 
Mills,  Miss  Phebe 
Moulthrop,  Samuel  P. 
Tuttle,  Mrs.  George  F. 
Wait,  John  C. 
Webber,  Richard 
Witherbee,  Hon.  Walter  C. 


Rhinebeck 

Hudson  Falls 

Glens  Falls 

Hotel  American,  Saratoga  Springs 

111  Broadway,  New  York 

Glens  Falls,  N.  Y. 

Little  Falls 

Oswego 

Clinton 

Little  Falls 

Shelving  Rock 

212  Union  St.,  Schenectady 

Glens  Falls 

40  Phelps,  Ave.,  Rochester 

Plattsburgh 

233  Broadway,  New  York 

109  Hamilton  Ave.,  New  Rochelle 

Port  Henry 


Active  Members 


Armstrong,  Henry  Charles 
Ashley,  Mrs.  Calvin  L. 
Adriance  Memorial  Library 


Summer  Hill,  Sydney,  Australia. 
St.  Johnsville 
Poughkeepsie 


10     NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION 


Baker,  Mrs.  D.  B. 
Bartholomew,  Hon.  H.  A. 
Bates,  Mrs.  C.  L. 
Betts,  O.  D. 

Bonesteele,  Mrs.  Sarah  H. 
Boshart,  Mrs.  C.  Frederick 
Briggs,  Roscoe  C. 
Brown,  Wilham  Grant 
Beal,  Joseph 

Clark,  Mrs.  Abby  R. 
Comly,  Mrs.  Walter  S. 
Compton,  Mrs,  Helen  R. 
Couch,  Mrs.  Natalia  F. 

Davenport,  Hon.  Frederick  M 
Davies,  William  W. 
Dayton,  J.  Judd 
DeAnglis,  Hon.  Pascal  C.  J. 
Devereaux,  Charles  A. 
Ditmars,  Chaimcey  L.  C. 
Doig,  Mrs.  Frank  Collins 
Dorr,  Carl  E.  Onondaga 

Dugan,  W^illiam  J. 
Dunlap,  Charles  J. 
Dunlop,  Beveridge  Colin 
Dunlop,  Mrs.  Beveridge  C. 

Eggleston,  Miss  Frances  J. 

Fish,  John  D. 

Franchot,  Hon.  N.  V.  V.,  2d. 

Gow,  Edward  C,  M.  D. 

Harrington,  Hon.  Charles  M. 
Horn,  Miss  Helen  E. 

Jackson,  Mrs.  W.  H. 
Jeffery,  Hon.  David  E. 

Keman,  Mrs.  Francis  K. 
Knapp,  Hon.  Charles  L. 


46  West  Court  St.,  Cortland 

R.  F.  D.  1,  Whitehall 

522  N.  James  St.,  Rome 

713  N.  A'ladison  St.,  Rome 

Victor 

Lowville 

376  Main  St.,  Oneonta 

2350  Broadway,  N.  Y. 

122  State  St.,  Albany 

9  Locust  St.,  Glens  Falls 

Comly  Ave.,  Port  Chester 

34  Elm  St.,  Hudson  Falls 

Nyack 

LL.  D.  Clinton 

51  Chamber  St.,  New  York 

Corinth 

11  Cottage  Place,  Utica 

448  Genesee  St.,  Utica 

Amityville 

Lowville 

Co.  Savings  Bank  Bldg.,  Syracuse 

Pierce  Ave.,   Hamburgh 

46  Lawton  St.,  New  Rochelle 

Spring  Valley 

Spring  Valley 

42  W.  5th  St.,  Oswego 

36  Greenwich  St.,  Hempstead 
42  W.  5th  St.,  Oswego 

21  Notre  Dame  St.,  Glens  Falls 

Plattsburgh 
St.  Johnsville 

Boonville 
Lockport 

324  Genesee  St.,  Utica 
Lowville 


LAKE  GEORGE  MEETING 


11 


Larkin,  Mrs.  Francis  Ossining 

LeFevre,  Ralph  New  Paltz 
Long  Island  Historical  Society  Pierpont  &  Clinton  Sts.,  Brooklyn 

Manion,  Mrs.  John  5  Cottage  Place,  Utica 

Martin,  Hon.  Louis  M.  Clinton 

Meiklejohn,  Miss  Marjorie  Whitehall 

Merritt,  Jesse  Farmingdale 

Milbank,  Mrs.  J.  Hungerford  252  Merrick  Road  West,  Freeport 


Miller,  Alfred   J. 
Minnick,  Mrs.  Rose 
Morris,  Mrs.  A.  V 
Moulton,  Mrs.  Roy  K, 

Paine,  Mrs.  Silas  H. 
Peters,  Charles  V. 
Pierson,  Miss  Mae  A., 


Pitcher,  Dwight  Copley 
Proctor,  Mrs.  Thomas  Redfield 


Ramapo 

1  Davis  St.,  Glens  Falls 

Morris  House,  Amsterdam 

875  W.  ISlst.  St.,  New  York 

Silver  Bay 

Glens  Falls 

Sec'y  Town  of  Arcadia  Historical  Society, 

24  W.  Miller  St.,  Newark 

15  Faxton  St.,  Utica 

312  Genesee  St.,  Utica 


Reeder,  Mrs.  Charles  J. 
Rifenburgh,  George  L.,  Ph.  B. 
Rockwell,  Mrs.  George 
Roosevelt,  Hon.  Theodore 

Schmidt,  Mrs.  W.  A. 
Schoonmaker,  Mrs.  John  D. 
Seelye,  Mrs.  Elwyn 
Sharpe,  Miss  Elizabeth  J. 
Smith,  Hon.  Clarence  C. 
Smith,  Miss  M.  R. 
Stedman,  George  W. 
Stilson,  Mrs.  A.  F. 
Suiter,  Mrs.  J.  A.,  jr. 

Thompson,  Hobart  W. 
Tompkins,  Hon.  Arthur  S. 
Titus,  Edmund  D. 
Trumbull,  Miss  Mary 
Van  Cortlandt,  Miss  Anne  S. 
Van    Gaasbeek, 


410  State  St.,  Carthage 

84  Willett  St.,  Albany 

Luzerne 

"Council  Rock,"  Oyster  Bay,L.L 

21  Bellevue  Ave.,  Ilion 

124  W.  Chestnut  St.,  Kingston 

R.  F.  D.  No.  1,  Lake  George 

323  Genesee  St.,  Utica 

Saratoga  Springs 

50  DuBois  St.,  Newburgh 

51  State  St.,  Albany 

64  Tompkins  St.,  Cortland 

408  No.  Washington  St.,  Herkianer 

149  Second  St.,  Troy 

Nyack 

377  E.  8th  St.,  Brooklyn 

R.  F.  D.  2,  Hudson  Falls 

Manor  House,  Croton-on-Hudson 

Louis    Wheat  c/o  Metropolitan   Trust  Co., 

60  Wall  St.,  New  York 


12    NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION 

Ward,  A.  Walter  8  Co  veil  Ave.,  Saratoga  Springs 

Welch,   Major  William  Addams  44  First  St.,   Haverstraw 

Whitfield,  Erie  W.  220  Broadway,  New  York 

Williams,  Hon.  C.  J.  Remsen 

Wilmarth,  Mrs.  C.  M.  299  Glen  St.,  Glens  Falls 

Wolcott,  Miss  Mary  Hubbard  512  Plant  St.,  Utica 

Woodbury,  Mrs.  Eri  D.  Cheshire,  Conn. 

Youker,  Miss  Mary  L.  St.  Johnsville 


Battlefield   Parks 

Lake  George 

The  year  has  been  most  fortunate  for  the  park,  due  to  the 
interest  and  generosity  of  Mr.  George  D.  Pratt,  who  early  in 
the  year  became  a  life  member  of  our  association.  He  has  given 
the  association  the  honor  of  accepting  the  beautiful  bronze  statue 
of  an  Indian  which  has  been  placed  in  the  Park.  It  is  a  most 
appropriate  gift  and  adds  much  to  the  natural  beauty  and  historic 
interest  of  the  surroundings.  He  has  made  possible  the  repairing 
of  the  east  wall  of  the  Fort,  installation  of  the  large  stone  electric 
lighted  pillars  at  the  north  entrance  and  the  stone  and  concrete 
approach  to  the  old  French  Dock.  Interest  in  this  work  has  been 
very  marked,  resulting  in  a  great  increase  in  the  number  of  visitors, 
thousands  going  there  on  holidays  and  Sundays. 

With  the  $1,180  appropriated  by  the  State,  we  have  been  able 
to  make  part  of  the  much  needed  repairs  to  the  Bowling  House. 
These  repairs  include  enlarging  the  cellar,  making  outside  entrance 
to  same,  building  large  cement  platform  in  rear,  painting  roofs  and 
installing  electric  lights  throughout  the  house.  (21  lights  in  all) 
$180  was  paid  for  water  rent  and  the  balance  was  used  in  repairs 
to  roads,  walks  and  fences,  in  cutting  and  carting  away  under- 
brush and  clearing  up  refuse. 

It  is  hoped  the  1922  Legislature  will  appropriate  enough  money 
to  finish  the  repairs  to  the  Dowling  House,  to  erect  pillars  at  the 
south  entrance  to  the  park,  to  repair  the  dock  and  to  build  a  tool 
house.  The  work  of  repairing  the  Fort  should  be  carried  on, 
and  more  roads  should  be  built  through  the  grounds.      The  road 


BATTLEFIELD  PARKS  13 

north  of  the  Colonial  War  Moniiment  should  be  shifted  farther 
north  to  make  room  for  the  placing  of  evergreens  as  a  background 
and  setting  for  the  monument.  It  is  also  hoped  that  one  of  the 
buildings  used  as  officers  quarters  may  in  time  be  rebuilt  and  used 
as  a  museum.  There  are  a  great  many  private  collections  of 
relics  found  in  the  locality  which  no  doubt  would  be  donated  for 
this  purpose. 

Stewart     MacFarland 


Bennington 

In  the  beautiful  Valley  of  the  Walloomsac  River,  in  a  locality 
noted  for  the  beauty  of  its  pastoral  scenery,  situated  within  easy 
access  to  the  main  highways  of  the  country,  with  an  electric 
railway  running  through  it,  and  the  Walloomsac  station  of  the 
Bennington  &  Rutland  Railway  only  a  mile  distant,  the  State  of 
New  York  has  created  a  reservation  known  as  the  Bennington 
Battleground,  of  which  this  Association  is  the  custodian. 

Burgoyne's  Invasion  in  1777  is  acknowledged  to  have  been  one 
of  the  most  important  events  in  the  War  of  the  American  Revolu- 
tion. Its  purpose  was,  to  divide  the  colonies  by  invading  them 
from  the  north,  by  way  of  Lake  Champlain,  and  by  advancing  up 
the  Hudson  River  from  New  York  City. 

To  the  American  Colonies  the  year  1777  was  one  of  the  most 
discouraging  in  the  whole  course  of  the  war.  The  British  were 
everjrwhere  m_ore  or  less  successful  against  the  untrained  forces 
of  the  colonies,  foreign  governments  turned  a  deaf  ear  to  requests 
for  recognition  of  the  American  Colonies,  and  as  the  culmination 
of  their  misfortunes,  the  news  of  Burgoyne's  invasion  from  Canada 
spread  dismay  among  the  colonists.  The  fall  of  Fort  Ticonderoga, 
the  disastrous  defeat  of  the  Americans  under  General  St.  Clair, 
at  Hubbardton,  Vermont,  and  the  steady  march  of  Burgoyne's 
invaders  down  the  Hudson  Valley,  spread  consternation  throughout 
the  entire  eastern  countr}'. 

Until  the  shortage  of  food  compelled  him  to  plan  the  expedition 
into  New  England,  which  ended  in  the  Battle  of  Bennington, 
Burgoyne's  joume}^  had  been  a  triumphal  march.  His  victorious 
batallions  swept  everything  before  them.  In  a  bombastic  proc- 
lamation to  his  troops  he  declared,  "This  army  must  never  retreat," 


14     NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION 

and  they  never  did,  until  after  the  defeat  on  the  banks  of  the 
Walloomsac  River,  when  they  retreated  twelve  miles  up  the 
Hudson  River. 

Perhaps  no  battle  in  the  War  of  the  American  Revolution  has 
been  the  subject  of  so  much  fallacious  historical  comment  as  the 
Battle  of  Bennington.  From  1749  until  the  beginning  of  the  war, 
there  had  existed  a  state  of  border  warfare,  along  the  eastern 
boundary  of  New  York,  and  the  western  boundary  of  New  Hamp- 
shire, which  involved  the  settlers  in  Vermont  and  the  eastern 
towns  of  the  present  Washington  and  Rensselaer  counties  of  this 
State. 

It  is  referred  to  at  this  time,  because  of  its  influence  upon  the 
situation  at  the  time  of  Burgoyne's  invasion.  That  movement 
was  planned  because  it  was  believed  that  a  considerable  number 
of  the  men  of  the  borderland,  would  welcome  the  opportunity 
which  the  invasion  would  give  them,  to  fight  against  their  enemies 
at  home. 

Burgoyne  was  encouraged  in  this  belief  by  the  readiness  with 
which  the  settlers  along  the  shore  of  Lake  Champlain  sold  their 
cattle  and  other  supplies  to  his  army.  It  Hterally  lived  off 
the  country,  while  marching  south.  But  after  it  passed  Lake 
Champlain  all  was  changed,  and  Burgoyne  complains  that  "those 
whom  he  expected  to  be  most  friendly,  hung  like  a  cloud  on  his 
left,"  and  were  his  most  active  enemies. 

It  was  the  enmity  engendered  by  this  state  of  border  warfare 
which  influenced  the  Vermont  people  to  insist  that  all  the  New 
York  farmers  who  fought  in  the  Battle  of  Bennington  were  Tories. 
It  is  the  remnant  of  that  century  old  enmity  which  breaks  out  to 
this  day  in  an  occasional  sneer,  when  the  New  York  people  show 
any  interest  in  the  history  of  this  battle,  which  was  fought  on 
present  New  York  soil,  as  a  part  of  a  campaign  in  which  New 
York  was  the  principal  sufferer,  as  she  was  also  the  principal 
defender  of  American  homes  and  firesides. 

The  Battle  of  Saratoga  is  recognized  by  Creasy  as  one  of  the 
Fifteen  Decisive  Battles.  The  Battle  of  Bennington  contributed 
very  largely  to  that  American  victory  by  destroying  an  indis- 
pensable part  of  Burgoyne's  army.  The  destruction  of  the  forces 
under  Baimi  and  Breyman,  and  the  consequent  demoralization 
of  the  active  Tory  element  among  the  colonists,  was  a  large  factor 


BATTLEFIELD  PARKS  15 

in  making  the  victory  at  Saratoga  decisive  and  complete.  The 
battles  of  Oriskan}^  and  Bennington,  and  the  final  victory  at 
Saratoga,  brought  the  recognition  of  the  American  Colonies  by 
foreign  nations,  and  was  the  beginning  of  a  long  series  of  American 
successes  which  culminated  in  the  final  surrender  of  the  British 
to  General  Washington  at  Yorktown  in  1781. 

The  stately  monument  which  adorns  the  Village  of  Bennington, 
erected  under  the  auspices  of  the  Federal  Government  as  a  me- 
morial to  the  victors  in  the  Battle  of  Bennington,  bears  upon  it  no 
reference  to  the  fact  that  the  battle  which  it  commemorates  was 
fought  on  the  soil  of  the  State  of  New  York,  or  to  its  remoteness 
from  the  actual  scene  of  conflict.  Many  tourists  who  visit  the 
monument,  express  surprise  at  this  omission,  and  wonder  that 
there  is  no  explanatory  tablet,  whereby  the  history  of  the  battle 
may  be  made  plain.  Many  others  go  away  with  the  impression 
that  the  monimient  is  located  on  the  battlefield,  and  to  that 
extent,  history  is  falsified.  The  omission  is  the  more  noticeable 
because  so  many  other  movements  of  the  American  forces  have 
been  carefully  and  permanently  marked. 

For  many  years  after  the  Revolution  the  people  of  the  Walloom- 
sac  and  Hoosick  valleys  assembled  on  the  battleground  on  the 
16th  of  August,  to  celebrate  the  anniversary  of  Stark's  victory. 
These  celebrations  were  well  attended,  and  the  programme  in- 
cluded patriotic  addresses  by  the  most  popular  ministers  in  the 
surrounding  country.  So  long  as  there  remained  in  the  vicinity, 
any  survivors  of  the  battle,  they  were  the  honored  guests  of  the 
day. 

These  celebrations  were  continued  until  about  the  time  of  the 
Mexican  War,  after  which,  the  people  seemed  to  lose  interest  in 
them,  and  finally  they  ceased  altogether.  Events  leading  up  to 
the  laying  of  the  comer  stone  of  the  monument  at  Bennington, 
August  16,  1877,  revived  interest  in  the  fact  that  the  battle  was 
fought  on  New  York  soil,  but  the  monimient  having  been  erected 
at  Bennington,  there  seemed  no  reason  to  hope  that  the  battle- 
field itself  would  ever  be  suitably  commemorated. 

Since  that  time,  several  attempts  have  been  made  to  organize 
some  sort  of  local  historical  society,  which  would  promote  public 
recognition  of  the  historic  value  of  the  battlefield,  but  after  a 
brief  existence  they  have  gradually    died   out.     On    March    24, 


16    NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION 

1911,  a  public  meeting  was  called  in  Hoosick  Falls,  at  which  time 
a  committee  was  appointed  to  endeavor  to  interest  the  Legislature 
of  the  State  in  the  purchase  of  the  battleground  for  a  public  park, 
as  the  first  step  toward  securing  a  proper  recognition  of  the  his- 
torical value  of  the  Battle  of  Bennington  b}^  the  people  of  the 
State  of  New  York. 

The  committee  worked  diligently  for  the  next  two  years  but 
without  any  encouragement,  until  the  session  of  1913,  when  a 
bill  appropriating  twenty-five  thousand  dollars,  ($25,000)  for  the 
purchase  of  the  battleground,  was  passed  by  the  Legislature,  and 
signed  by  Governor  William  Sulzer,  May  24,  1913.  After  the 
passage  of  the  bill,  the  committee  met  with  many  difficulties  which 
delayed  the  final  purchase  until  May  5,  1915. 

The  committee  did  not  expect  that  the  full  amount  appropriated 
would  be  used  for  the  purchase  of  the  land.  It  was  expected 
that  about  ten  thousand  dollars  would  be  available  for  the  pre- 
liminary work  of  preparing  the  park  for  public  use,  and  the  original 
bill  was  drawn  with  that  purpose  in  view.  Owing  to  an  error  in 
drafting  the  bill,  however,  the  balance  of  the  appropriation,  some 
$10,500,  can  not  be  used  for  that  purpose,  and  a  new  appropriation 
will  be  necessary  to  carry  out  the  work. 

As  the  matter  now  stands,  we  have  about  163  acres  of  rough 
farm  land,  which,  in  its  present  condition,  is  practically  useless  to 
the  public.  It  needs  a  comparatively  small  outlay  to  make  it  a 
source  of  pleasure  to  all  who  visit  it  to  study  its  historical  associa- 
tions. 

The  first  requisite  of  the  park  is  to  have  a  suitable  entrance  from 
the  highway,  and  a  road  built  to  the  top  of  the  hill  which  was  the 
site  of  Colonel  Baum  's  camp.  The  contour  of  the  land  is  such  that 
it  is  possible  to  build  such  a  road,  with  a  grade  that  will  make  it 
easy  of  ascent  for  automobiles  and  pedestrians.  When  the  road 
is  built,  there  will  be  no  lack  of  visitors  to  the  battleground,  be- 
cause of  the  beauty  of  the  scenery  which  surrounds  it,  and  when  it 
becomes  a  visiting  place  for  the  tourist,  there  will  be  no  lack  of 
interest  in  the  battleground. 

There  should  be  a  marker  built  on  the  top  of  the  hill,  with  a 
tablet  which  will  tell  the  story  of  the  conflict  Vv^hich  took  place 
there.  It  can  be  replaced  at  some  time  in  the  future  b\^  a  more 
substantial  monument.     Our  next  effort  should  be  directed  toward 


s 


BRONZE  FIGURES  OF  JOHXSOX  AND  "kING"  HENDRICK  SURMOUNT  THE 
LAKE  GEORGE   HATTLE  MONUMENT 


BATTLEFIELD  PARKS  17 

having  the  various  points  of  historic  interest  properiy  marked. 
Vermont  has  very  carefully  marked  the  progress  of  the  American 
forces  within  her  borders,  but  there  are  no  markers  which  show 
their  advance  in  New  York  State.  They  seem  to  have  vanished 
into  thin  air  because  of  our  seeming  lack  of  interest  in  that  im- 
portant battle. 

Eventually  permanent  markers  should  be  provided  for  all 
points  of  historic  interest  on  the  Battleground,  and  outside  of  the 
reservation,  at  such  places  as:  the  Tories  stockade;  and  the  St. 
Croix  Mill  and  Bridge,  where  the  Am.ericans  held  back  Colonel 
Breyman's  forces  imtil  General  Stark  was  able  to  collect  his 
scattered  forces  for  the  second  battle.  The  desperate  nature  of 
the  second  battle  should  be  commemorated  by  a  suitable  marker 
at  Walloomsac  Village,  where  the  battle  raged  with  varying 
success  until  darkness  and  the  timely  arrival  of  re-enforcements 
decided  the  conflict  in  favor  of  the  Americans. 

The  dwelling  house  and  buildings  on  the  lower  level  should  be 
kept  in  good  condition.  There  should  be  a  room  kept  as  a  rest 
room  and  ofhce,  which  is  needed  as  a  bureau  of  information  for 
visitors  to  the  park.  This  groimd  was  included  in  the  purchase 
because  tradition  says  that  all  of  the  British  and  most  of  the 
Americans  killed  in  the  battle  were  buried  in  the  field  beyond  the 
house. 

In  carrying  out  this  work,  we  should  emulate  the  example  of  the 
Vermont  Historical  Association,  which  has  marked  every  move- 
ment of  the  Amerion  forces  engaged  in  the  battle,  so  far  as  they 
occurred  in  the  State  of  Vermont.  There  can  be  no  doubt  that 
had  the  battle  occurred  on  Vermont  soil,  substantial  monuments 
woiild  have  been  erected  to  commemorate  the  scenes  of  conflict, 
long  ago. 

We  are  living  in  a  period  of  world-wide  unrest.  The  signs  of 
the  times,  and  the  growing  disregard  of  all  lawful  restraints  by 
increasing  numbers  of  our  people  indicate  that  the  most  pressing 
duty  of  the  State  today  is  that  of  impressing  upon  the  minds  of  the 
youth  of  our  land  and  the  millions  who  seek  an  asylum  on  our 
shores,  a  respect  for  the  laws  of  our  coimtry  and  a  proper  reverence 
for  the  fundamental  principles  laid  down   in  our  Constitution. 

It  is  m.ost  gratifying  that  the  State  of  New  York  is  becoming 
more  interested  in  the  historic  places  within  its  borders.     The 


18    NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION 

importance  of  preserving  the  Bennington  Battleground  as  in- 
spiration and  education  in  patriotism  was  fully  appreciated  by 
Governor  Sulzer,  who  filed  with  his  approval  of  the  purchase  of  the 
ground,  a  patriotic  memorandum  in  which  he  said  in  part: — 

"Nature  has  adorned  the  site  in  question  with  wondrous  beauty. 
The  Revolutionary  heroes  consecrated  this  ground  with  sacrifice 
and  privation,  and  with  the  lives  of  many  patriots  in  the  cause  of 
liberty.  In  this  ground  are  buried  all  those  who  were  killed  in  this 
great  battle.  To  Americans,  this  is  a  spot  hallowed  by  sacred 
memories.  To  the  historian,  it  is  the  scene  of  the  important 
part  of  one  of  the  Fifteen  Decisive  Battles  of  the  World.*  ****** 

Too  much  importance  cannot  be  given  to  the  effect  upon  the 
Revolutionary  War  which  the  valor  of  the  American  patriots  at 
this  place  produced.  It  was  one  of  the  turning  points  in  the 
struggle  for  American  independence. 

Many  lesser  events  in  our  early  history  have  been  suitably 
commemorated  for  their  historical  value.  This  is  not  only  com- 
mendable sentiment,  but  it  is  as  wise  as  it  is  practical.  The  great 
struggle  upon  our  soil,  which  the  purposes  of  this  bill  will  com- 
memorate, was  so  important,  so  far  reaching  in  its  influence  upon 
the  Revolutionary  War,  that  its  scenes  should  be  preserved  as  an 
education  in  our  history  and  an  incentive  to  patriotic  endeavor." 

Having  accepted  the  custody  of  the  Bennington  Battleground, 
this  Association  is  morally  bound  to  share  in  the  responsibility 
for  its  future  development.  Many  places  of  lesser  value  in  New 
York  history  have  been  cared  for,  and  it  needs  but  the  effort  on 
our  part  to  secure  for  this  long  neglected  battlefield,  the  develop- 
ment which  its  historical  importance  deserves. 

Let  us  then  bend  our  energies  toward  the  work  of  making  this 
spot  which  is  hallowed  by  the  blood  and  sacrifices  of  our  fore- 
fathers, one  of  the  shrines  of  American  liberty,  a  place  where 
patriotism  may  be  visualized,  a  place  which  will  serve  as  an  in- 
spiration to  popularize  the  study  of  the  history  of  the  American 
Revolution,  in  which  the  State  of  New  York  had  such  an  important 
and  glorious  part. 

James  A.  Beckett 


QUARTERLY  JOURNAL  19 

Quarterly  Journal 

The  Board  of  Editors  of  the  Quarterly  Journal  of  the  New 
York  State  Historical  Association  regrets  very  much  that  the 
April,  1921,  number  has  not  as  yet  appeared.  It  went  to  press 
just  before  the  beginning  of  the  great  strike  in  the  printing  trades 
and  although  Mr.  Humphrey,  who  does  this  work  for  us,  has 
strained  every  nerve  to  catch  up  with  the  accumulation  of  material 
on  hand,  he  has  not  succeeded  in  getting  the  April  number  out 
in  time  for  this  meeting.  We  hope  to  have  it  within  a  week  or  so 
and  distribute  it  to  those  members  who  have  expressed  their 
desire  to  receive  the  proceedings  in  quarterly  form. 

The  July  and  October  nimibers  we  hope  to  have  out  before  the 
close  of  the  year,  though  of  course  this  depends  largely  upon 
Mr.  Humphrey's  abiHty  to  handle  the  material. 

As  you  well  know  the  present  plan  is  to  distribute  the  Quarterly 
Journal  only  to  those  who  have  expressed  a  desire  to  receive  the 
proceedings  in  quarterly  installments.  For  the  others  the  pro- 
ceedings are  held  and  are  to  be  bound  at  the  close  of  the  year  and 
sent  to  the  members  as  usual.  For  those  who  receive  their  in- 
stallments quarterly  regular  covers,  uniform  with  the  volumes 
of  the  proceedings  already  published,  are  to  be  furnished  free  of 
charge.  For  the  proceedings  which  appeared  for  the  year  1920, 
covers  likewise  uniform  with  the  bindings  of  the  previous  volumes 
of  the  association  are  to  be  furnished.  The  orders  for  these  have 
been  placed  with  Mr.  Himiphrey,  but  these,  like  everything  else, 
have  been  held  up.  We  hope,  however,  to  have  this  cleared  up 
and  to  send  these  covers  to  all  who  have  requested  them. 

The  editors  and  the  board  of  trustees  would  have  preferred  to 
receive  from  the  members  their  four  quarterly  installments  for  the 
year  1920  and  to  have  had  these  bound  and  returned  free  of  cost 
to  them,  but  when  consideration  was  given  to  the  enormous  in- 
crease in  the  cost  of  printing  it  was  decided  that  the  finances  of  the 
association  would  not  permit  of  this.  When  we  consider  that  there 
has  practically  been  no  other  learned  association  of  the  kind 
which  has  not  increased  its  dues,  or  called  upon  its  members 
for  additional  contributions,  we  are  to  congratulate  ourselves 
that  this  association  has  done  so  well.  We  have  been  very  much 
averse  to  taking  any  steps  which  would  call  upon  our  members 


20    NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION 

to  sanction  or  to  vote  for  an  increase  in  the  annual  dues,  but  they 
will  easily  appreciate  that  the  increase  in  the  cost  of  printing  and 
binding  has  been  so  great  that  the  same  elaborate  reports  that 
used  to  appear  for  $3.00  cannot  continue  to  be  issued  in  such  a 
form  unless  the  dues  are  increased.  The  alternative  is  to  diminish 
the  size  of  the  volume  by  cutting  down  the  amount  of  printing 
and  thereby  also  decreasing  the  cost  of  binding.  The  latter  can 
also  be  done  by  binding  the  annual  volume  in  paper,  but  the  mem- 
bers cannot  both  expect  to  have  the  dues  remain  as  they  are  and 
still  receive  a  volume  which  costs  twice  as  much  to  produce  now 
as  it  did  five  years  ago. 

By  pursuing  our  present  method  of  distributing  the  quarterly 
installments  in  the  form  of  a  journal  to  only  such  as  ask  for  them, 
and  of  distributing  to  the  others  the  proceedings  bound,  we  feel 
that  we  are  satisfying  both  classes  of  members  in  the  association. 
At  the  same  time  we  must  realize  that  at  present  we  are  barely 
keeping  within  our  financial  resources  without  increasing  the  dues. 

James  Sullivan 


Whereas,  in  the  death  of  its  First  Vice-President  Charles  M. 
Dow,  at  Jamestown  on  December  20,  1920,  the  association  has 
suffered  an  irreparable  loss  of  an  honored  official  and  valuable 
coimselor,  be  it, 

Resolved,  That  the  association  spread  upon  its  minutes  and 
convey  to  his  family  this  record  of  the  sense  of  its  loss. 


HISTORIC  SPOTS  NEAR  LAKE  GEORGE 

AUTOMOBILE  TRIP 

Tuesday  Afternoon,  October  4,  iq2T. 

The  Chepontuc  Chapter  of  the  D.  A.  R.  of  Glens  Falls,  gave  the 
members  of  the  New  York  State  Historical  Association  a  com- 
plimentary automobile  trip  to  places  of  historic  interest  in  the 
vicinity  of  Lake  George.  The  party  left  Fort  William  Henry 
Hotel  on  the  afternoon  of  October  4,  at  2:00  o'clock. 

The  automobiles  proceeded  from  the  hotel  along  the  shore  of 
Lake  George  to  the  Lake  George  Battleground  Park,  where  the 
dedication  of  the  bronze  statue  of  an  Indian  of  heroic  size,  the 
gift  to  the  Association  by  George  D.  Pratt,  took  place  at  2:15 
o'clock.  On  account  of  the  absence  of  Mr.  George  D.  Pratt  in 
Alaska,  the  presentation  was  made  by  his  brother,  Mr.  Frederick  B. 
Pratt. 

At  the  conclusion  of  the  exercises,  the  automobile  trip  was 
resumed.  As  each  automobile  left  the  road  leading  south  from 
the  Lake  George  reservation  and  crossed  the  trolley  track  on  to  the 
state  road,  it  was  found  to  be  a  convenience  to  have  the  trip  section 
of  the  speedometer  turned  back  to  zero.  The  mileage  given  in  the 
itinerary  after  leaving  the  Park  enabled  those  in  each  car  to  locate 
the  points  of  interest,  even  if  no  one  of  its  occupants  was  familiar 
with  the  section  of  the  country  traveled  through.  It  was  sug- 
gested that  no  stops  be  made  until  the  end  of  the  run,  which  was 
the  site  of  old  Fort  Edward.  Practically  all  of  the  points  of 
historic  interest  given  were  visited  on  the  way  back  to  Lake 
George. 

Fort  William  Henry.  The  start  was  made  from  historic 
ground.  The  hotel  is  on  the  site  of  Fort  William  Henry,  which 
was  built  by  Sir  William  Johnson  in  1755.  The  outlines  of  the 
old  fort  may  still  be  plainly  seen  just  to  the  east  of  the  hotel. 
Looking  to  the  north,  on  the  shore  of  Lake  George  is  the  scene  of 
the  embarkation  of  the  great  army  of  Abercronby  as  it  set  out 


22  FREDERICK  B.  RICHARDS 

on  Jvily  5th,  1758,  on  its  ill-fated  move  against  the  French  at 
Ticonderoga.  Never  before  nor  since  has  so  magnificent  a  spec- 
tacle been  seen  on  the  waters  of  Lake  George.  (See  Parkman's 
"Montcalm  and  Wolfe"  2:298-99.) 

Lake  George  Battle-ground  Park.  To  the  south  is  the 
scene  of  the  battle  of  Lake  George,  on  September  8,  1755.  This 
is  now  the  Lake  George  Battle-ground  Park,  a  reservation  of  the 
State  of  New  York  in  the  custody  of  the  New  York  State  Historical 
Association.  The  statue  of  Sir  William  Johnson  and  King  Hen- 
drick  on  the  north  edge  of  the  Reservation  was  presented  by  the 
Society  of  Colonial  Wars. 

Fort  George.  On  the  reservation,  a  little  farther  to  the  south, 
is  old  Fort  George,  built  in  1759  by  Colonel  James  Montresor, 
who  was  the  chief  engineer  of  General  Amherst.  The  fort  was 
never  completed  and  was  so  little  needed  that  it  was  commonly 
called  "Montresor's  folly." 

Trip 

Miles. 

00.0        Jimction  of  the  Fort  George  road  with  the  State  Highway. 

01.6  Bloody  Pond  on  the  left.  This  is  the  first  point  of 
interest  after  leaving  Lake  George.  At  sunset  after  the 
battle  at  Lake  George  a  party  of  the  retreating  French 
encamped  here.  They  were  surprised  and  routed  by  a 
detachment  from  Fort  Edward.  It  is  said  that  two  hundred 
bodies  were  thrown  into  the  small  shallow  pond  and  that  its 
waters  were  tinged  with  blood  for  days,  hence  the  name. 
The  fight  near  Bloody  Pond  in  the  morning  of  the  same  day 
that  resulted  in  the  death  of  King  Hendrick  and  Colonel 
Ephraim  Williams,  the  foimder  of  Williams  College,  is 
known  as  "The  Bloody  Morning  Scout." 

01.8  Entrance  to  Military  Road,  on  right.  Soon  after 
leaving  Bloody  Pond,  the  party  left  the  state  road  and 
passed  over  the  old  military  road  built  by  Sir  William 
Johnson  in  1755  from  Fort  Edward  to  Fort  William  Henry. 
The  road  was  built  through  virgin  forest  and  Fort  William 
Henry  was  built  where  there  was  no  clearing  and  where 
never  a  tree  had  been  felled. 

01.9  Rifle  Pit,  on  the  left. 

02.  Breast  Works,  on  the  right. 


HISTORIC  SPOTS  NEAR  LAKE  GEORGE  23 

02.5  Ephraim  Williams's  Monument,  on  left.  It  is  on  this 
old  military  road  that  a  monument  was  erected  to  Col- 
onel Williams  on  the  boulder  on  which  he  is  reported  to 
have  been  standing  directing  the  battle. 

02.6  Ephraim  Williams's  Grave,  on  the  right.  A  little 
farther  to  the  south  on  the  opposite  side  of  the  road  is  where 
he  was  buried.  What  were  said  to  be  his  remains  were 
taken  to  Williamstown,  Massachusetts,  and  their  burial  in 
the  Chapel  there  was  made  the  occasion  of  a  grand  military 
spectacle  at  the  Commencement  of  1920. 

03.  Enter  state  road  at  Halfway  House. 

05.7  Miller  Hill.  As  we  reach  Miller  Hill,  if  the  day  is  clear, 
we  have  one  of  the  finest  views  of  that  part  of  the  coimtry. 
As  one  looks  out  on  the  plain  below,  seeing  Glens  Falls, 
South  Glens  Falls,  Hudson  Falls  and  Fort  Edward,  all 
nearly  lost  amid  the  trees,  one  is  reminded  of  Goldsmith's 
Deserted  Village,  "Sweet  Auburn!  Loveliest  village  of  the 
plain." 

05.8  Blind  Rock,  on  the  left.  Only  a  few  rods  from  the  road 
and  about  midway  between  the  highway  and  a  large  oak 
tree  is  a  large  boulder,  now  covered  except  a  small  part  of  its 
crown  known  as  Blind  Rock.  The  tradition  is  that  this  was 
a  favorite  place  of  meeting  for  the  Indians  for  the  purpose  of 
torturing  their  prisoners  and  that  on  one  occasion  the  eyes 
of  the  prisoner  were  torn  out  and  cast  in  a  fire  built  upon  the 
rock.  On  another  occasion  a  blind  prisoner  is  said  to  have 
been  burned  at  the  stake  there. 

06.8  Halfway  Brook.  So  called  because  it  was  half  way 
betvs^een  Fort  Edward  and  Fort  William  Henry.  Because 
of  its  location  and  because  of  the  purity  and  excellence  of  its 
water,  it  was  a  favorite  resting  and  camping  place  for  parties, 
passing  from  one  fort  to  the  other.  After  the  defeat  of 
Abercromby  the  country  roimd  about  was  overrun  by 
rangers  of  both  parties.  During  this  period  a  large  train 
carrying  supplies  from  Fort  Edward  to  Fort  William  Henry 
was  sent  out  convoyed  by  a  considerable  nimiber  of  soldiers. 
The  train  consisted  of  60  ox-carts,  each  of  which  was  drawn 
by  two  or  three  yoke  of  oxen.  The  party  rested  over  night 
at  Halfway  Brook.     The  next  morning,  of  July  27,   1758, 


24  FREDERICK  B.  RICHARDS 

they  were  attacked  by  French  and  Indians  between  Halfway 
Brook  and  Miller  Hill.  One  hundred  soldiers,  all  the  team- 
sters, and  some  women  were  killed.  Two  hundred  and 
fifty  oxen  were  slaughtered  and  the  enemy  escaped  before  a 
party  of  American  rangers  who  had  heard  the  firing  could 
reach  the  place.  This  was  one  of  many  similar  occurrences 
that  took  place  in  the  territory  mentioned. 

When  Amherst  succeeded  Abercromby  he  was  as  cautious 
as  Abercromxby  had  been  reckless,  and  he  erected  many 
forts  in  the  territory  he  occupied.  A  fort  was  built  on  the 
south  side  of  Halfway  Brook  a  few  rods  east  of  the  old 
military  road  in  1759.  No  remains  are  now  visible.  This 
was  known  as  Fort  Amherst. 

06.9         Halfway  Brook  Tablet,  on  the  left. 

08.3  Bank  Square,  Glens  Falls,  in  front  of  the  Rockwell 
House.  Proceed  straight  ahead  down  the  Glen  street  hill  to 
the  viaduct  crossing  the  Hudson  River. 

08.6  Cooper's  Cave.  "The  Last  of  the  Mohicans"  treats 
largely  of  the  section  of  the  country  you  are  now  visiting. 
The  cave  mentioned  in  the  book  can  be  reached  from  the 
bridge  that  now  spans  the  river  at  Glens  Falls.  It  is  an 
opening  under  the  plateau  of  limestone  rock  on  the  down- 
stream side  farthest  from  the  falls.  (Read  "The  Last  of  the 
Mohicans"  before  coming  to  the  meeting.) 

09.1  South  Glens  Falls  Four  Comers.  Straight  ahead  up  the 
hill  through  South  Glens  Falls  to  the  four  comers  at  the  top 
of  the  hill  and  take  the  turn  to  the  left  on  to  a  dirt  road. 

09.3         Turn  to  the  right  past  new  school. 

09.5         Railroad  crossing. 

09.8         Straight  ahead.     Don't  turn  to  right. 

10.  View  Cement  Works,  across  Hudson  River,  to  the  left. 

11.3  View  Hudson  Falls,  formerly  Sandy  Hill,  across  Hudson 
River,  to  the  left. 

11.4  Fenimore  Mills,  of  the  Union  Bag  and  Paper  Company, 

11.5  Tum  at  right  angles  to  the  left,  go  through  the  mill  yard, 
down  a  little  steep  pitch  across  two  railroad  tracks  and  on  to 

11.7  Bridge  across  the  Hudson. 

(Baker's  Falls,  the  local  name  of  the  water  power  on  the 
Hudson  at  Hudson  Falls,  is,  next  to  Niagara  Falls,  the 


HISTORIC  SPOTS  NEAR  LAKE  GEORGE  25 

largest  water  power  in  the  State  of  New  York.  The  water 
development  is  at  the  right  and  the  mills  of  the  Union  Bag 
and  Paper  Company,  the  Standard  Wall  Paper  Company 
and  the  Sandy  Hill  Iron  &  Brass  Works  are  on  the  left 
bank  of  the  river). 

11.9         Turn  to  the  right. 

12.2  Turn  to  the  left,  on  brick  pavement,  cross  railroad  track 
and  proceed  up  John  Street. 

12.4  Turn  to  the  right  on  Main  Street  and  follow  brick  pave- 
ment to  the  end  of  the  village  of  Hudson  Falls  on  to  the 
macadam  road  leading  to  Fort  Edward. 

12.9  Union  Cemetery,  between  Hudson  Falls  and  Fort 
Edward. 

In  an  enclosure  surrounded  by  a  high  iron  fence,  about 
fifty  feet  inside  the  main  gate  of  the  cemetery  to  the  left, 
are  the  graves  of  Jane  McCrea  and  Major  Duncan  Campbell. 
Perhaps  no  other  act  of  the  savages  during  the  Revolution 
was  more  pitiful  or  productive  of  greater  results  than  the 
murder  of  Jane  McCrea,  on  July  27,  1777.  The  Jane 
McCrea  Chapter  of  the  D.  A.  R.  has  erected  a  marker  at  the 
place  where  she  is  said  to  have  been  killed.  She  was  buried 
first  in  the  cemetery  at  Fort  Edward  and  later  removed  to 
the  Union  Cemetery.  Some  3^ears  ago  the  children  of  the 
schools  in  all  this  section  of  the  country  raised  by  their  own 
personal  contributions  a  sirni  to  erect  an  iron  fence  to 
protect  her  monument  from  relic -seeking  vandals,  several 
headstones  having  been  chipped  away. 

While  the  story  of  Jane  McCrea  is  well  known  to  every 
student  of  history,  the  legend  of  Duncan  Campbell  appeals 
more  to  the  Scot  and  is  one  of  the  best  known  of  Scottish 
legends.  Briefly,  the  story  is  that  Duncan  Campbell  was 
warned  by  a  ghost  of  his  death  at  Ticonderoga.  The 
warning  took  place  at  old  Inverawe  in  the  Highlands  of 
Scotland  and  at  the  time  Ticonderoga  was  only  an  Indian 
name  for  the  place,  then  called  Carillon  by  the  French  who 
controlled  it.  Stevenson  tells  in  his  poem,  "Ticonderoga," 
how  Duncan  inquires  vainly  for  information  about  the  place 
of  his  death.  Years  later,  when  Campbell  is  Major  in  the 
old  Black  Watch,  the  ghost  appears  again  the  night  before 


26  FREDERICK  B.  RICHARDS 

the  battle  of  July  8,  1758,  and  Duncan  of  Inverawe  knows 
that  his  end  is  near.  (Read  Appendix  G.  Parkman's 
"Montcalm  and  Wolfe,"  or  "The  Black  Watch  at  Ticon- 
deroga,"  Vol.  X,  Proceedings  of  the  New  York  State  His- 
torical Association. 

13.8  Monument  to  the  Massacre  of  Jane  McCrea,  on 
right. 

Erected  by  the  Jane  McCrea  Chapter  of  D.  A.  R. 

13.9  To  right,  cross  dry  bridge  over  railroad  track,  next  turn 
to  the  left,  crossing  trolley  track  and  canal,  down  to  the 
village  of  Fort  Edward.     Proceed  straight  ahead. 

14.4         Cross  railroad  track. 

14.6  Stop  at  bottom  of  street  and  those  who  wished  to  see  the 
site  of  old  Fort  Edward  left  the  automobiles  at  this  point  and 
proceeded  on  foot  for  a  few  hundred  feet  by  a  short  street  ta 
the  right  to  the  bank  of  the  Hudson  River. 

This  place  has  borne  several  names.  The  first  was  a 
stockaded  house  that  was  known  as  Fort  Lydius.  In  1709 
Colonel  Francis  Nicholson  led  an  expedition  against  Canada 
and  erected  at  this  place  a  fort  that  bore  his  name.  The 
later  fort  was  erected  by  Sir  William  Johnson  in  1755  and 
named  in  honor  of  a  brother  of  King  George  HI. 

The  ramparts  of  the  fort  were  sixteen  feet  high  and 
twenty-two  feet  thick.  It  was  surrounded  on  three  sides 
by  a  deep  moat  and  was  protected  by  the  river  on  the  other 
side.  The  fort  was  irregular  in  form  and  it  was  about 
1,600  feet  around  it.  It  mounted  six  cannon.  The  site  of 
the  fort  is  indicated  by  a  marker  erected  by  the  Jane  Mc- 
Crea Chapter  of  the  D.  A.  R. 

Few  places  have  been  officially  visited  b  v  more  men  of  note 
than  has  this  old  fort.  Here  Sir  William  Johnson  gathered 
the  force  that  was  to  operate  against  the  French  at  Ticon- 
deroga.  Here  Abercromby  gathered  the  largest  force  that 
ever  moved  against  the  French  and  Indians.  Here  Am- 
herst gathered  a  lesser  force,  but  one  that  succeeded  where 
Abercromby  failed.  Here  Burgo\Tie,  who  essayed  to  com- 
plete the  subjugation  of  the  colonies  spent  some  time. 
Other  famous  men  who  were  here  at  different  times  were 
Joseph    Brant,   the   famous   Indian   Chieftain,   also   King 


HISTORIC  SPOTS  NEAR  LAKE  GEORGE  27 

Hendrick;  Colonel  Bradstreet,  who  captured  Frontenac  from 
the  French;  Lieutenant  John  Butler,  the  father  of  the  in- 
famous Walter  Butler;  Major  Duncan  Campbell,  of  In- 
verawe,  Scotland;  Lord  Howe  and  Lord  Loudoun;  Colonel 
George  Monroe;  General  Daniel  Webb,  whose  personal 
cowardice  led  to  the  defeat  of  Colonel  Monroe  at  Fort 
William  Henry  and  the  shameful  massacre  there;  General 
Fitz  John  Winthrop,  Colonel  Ephraim  Williams  and  many 
others. 

Fort  Edward  was  known  as  the  Great  Carrying  Place, 
possibly  because  of  the  amount  of  traffic  between  there  and 
Lake  Champlain,  but  more  likely  because  of  the  length  of 
the  carry. 

This  was  the  end  of  the  run.  Each  party  proceeded  back 
to  Fort  William  Henry  as  it  pleased.  An  easy  way  to 
make  the  turn  was  to  go  around  the  block,  proceeding  as 
follows  : 

14.8  First  turn  to  the  left. 

In  the  center  of  this  block  to  the  right  is  the  old  cemetery 
of  Fort  Edward,  where  Jane  McCrea  and  Duncan  Campbell 
were  originally  buried. 

The  next  turn  to  the  left  will  come  out  on  the  brick  pave- 
ment, then  turn  to  the  right. 

14.9  Cross  D.  &  H.  Raih-oad  track. 

15.3  Dry  Bridge. 

16.4  Union  Cemetery. 

Turn  in  here  and  see  the  Jane  McCrea  and  Duncan 
Campbell  graves  and  headstones. 
16.9        Old  Sandy  Hill  Cemetery  on  right. 

In  this  cemetery  are  buried  some  of  the  distinguished  men 
of  the  early  days  of  Sandy  Hill. 

17.3  Pass  to  the  left  of  the  Soldiers'  Montmient  at  Hudson 
Falls  and  the  village  park. 

Boulder  in  park  commemorates  an  episode  of  July,  1758, 
when  sixteen  soldiers,  bound  and  seated  on  a  log,  were 
massacred  and  one,  John  Quackenbos,  a  teamster,  escaped 
death  at  the  intercession  of  a  squaw,  who  claimed  him  as 
her  slave  and  took  him  to  Canada. 

17.4  Top  of  "Big  Hill." 


28  FREDERICK  B.  RICHARDS 

Until  about  thirty  years  ago  at  the  top  of  this  hill  on  the 
side  toward  the  river,  was  the  blacksmith  shop  where 
Burgoyne's  horses  were  shod  at  the  time  of  the  Revolution. 

It  is  said  that  this  hill,  which  in  early  days  was  very 
sandy,  gave  the  name  Sandy  Hill.  The  village  bore  this 
name  until  1910,  when  it  was  changed  to  Hudson  Falls. 
18.6         Bridge  crossing  the  canal. 

At  the  left  are  the  mills  of  the  Imperial  Wall  Paper 
Company  and  Color  Works. 

19.3  Pavement  at  entrance  of  Glens  Falls. 

19.9        At  the  right  is  the  Glens  Falls  Home  for  Aged  and  In- 
firm Women. 

20.4  Bank  Square. 

Proceed  up  Glen  Street  to  the  state  highway  and  straight 
ahead  to  Fort  William  Henry. 

The  Delaware  and  Hudson  Company  very  kindly  presented  to 
the  members  who  attended  the  meeting  one  hundred  and  fifty 
copies  of  their  "Summer  Paradise  in  History,"  which  the  Secretary 
distributed  so  that  each  person  or  group  received  a  copy.  This 
was  useful  in  looking  up  matters  of  historic  interest  in  the  locality. 
Attention  was  called  to  the  following: 

Title  Page 

Introduction 

Abercromby's  Embarkation 19 

Battle  of  Diamond  Island 29 

Battle  of  Lake  George 31 

Black  Watch  Memorial 36 

Bloody  Morning  Scout 36 

Boulder  to  the  Heroes  of  the  Four  Nations 38 

Major  Duncan  Campbell 40 

Fort  Edward 56 

Fort  George 57 

Fort  Ticonderoga 61 

Fort  WilHam  Henry 63 

Great  Carrying  Place 68 

Halfway  Brook 70 

Lord  Howe 73 

Father  Jogues ;  58 


HISTORIC  SPOTS  NEAR  LAKE  GEORGE  29 

Title  Page 

Lake  George 91 

Jane  McCrea 92 

Lake  George  Battleground  Park 92 

Rogers  Rock 105 

Williams's  Moniiment 120 

See  also  your  file  of  Proceedings  of  the  New  York  State  Historic- 
al Association.  Vols.  L,  IL,  and  X  are  almost  entirely  filled  with 
articles  of  this  locality  and  in  the  other  volumes  scattering  articles 
of  interest  may  be  found.  For  example — Father  Jogues  in  Vol. 
IV.;  Halfway  Brook  in  History  in  Vol.  VI.  The  most  complete 
list  of  Green  Motmtain  Boys  who  were  at  the  Capture  of  Fort 
Ticonderoga  under  Ethan  Allen  that  is  published  anywhere  is  in 
Vol.  IX.;  Jane  McCrea  in  Vol.  XII.;  Cooper's  Cave  in  Vol. 
XVI.,  etc. 

Frederick    B.    Richards 


ADDRESSES  AT  THE  PRESENTATION  OF  AN 

INDIAN  STATUE  TO  THE  NEW  YORK 

STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION^ 

As  we  stand  here  upon  this  eminence  and  look  upon  the  one 
hand  toward  Lake  George,  happy  recreation  ground  of  vaca- 
tionists from  far  and  near,  and  on  the  other  hand  toward  the  quiet 
meadows  of  peaceful  farms,  it  is  hard  for  us  to  realize  that  we  are 
in  the  midst  of  a  territory  which  for  years  was  the  scene  of  battle 
and  bloodshed.  Indeed  these  crucial  events  of  bygone  years- 
events  which  directed  the  whole  course  of  American  history — 
would  be  doubtless  a  completely  closed  book  to  the  vast  ma- 
joritv  of  travelers  through  this  historic  region,  were  it  not  for  the 
existence  today  of  old  landmarks,  like  Fort  George,  to  preserve 
through  the  centiuies  the  memories  of  the  past.  And  the  preser- 
vation of  many  of  these  historic  landmarks  has  been  no  mere 
lucky  or  haphazard  occurrence;  it  has  been  directly  due  to  the 
patriotism  of  the  members  of  the  New  York  State  Historical 
Association,  bv  whose  efforts  the  history  and  tradition  of  this 
territory  have  been  recorded  and  cherished. 

So  in  the  first  place  it  is  as  a  tribute  of  appreciation  of  the  loyal 
and  important  work  which  it  has  accomplished  and  is  accomplish- 
ing that  I  have  the  pleasure  of  presenting  today  this  statue  to  the 
New  York  State  Historical  Association. 

Of  the  many  sites  which  might  have  been  selected,  that  of  the 
Lake  George  Battleground  Park  was  chosen  for  a  number  of 
reasons.  One  of  these  was  my  regard  for  the  Honorable  Stewart 
MacFarland,  representative  of  this  district  in  the  Assembly, 
whose  public-spirited  devotion  to  the  best  interests  of  the  State 
and  particularly  to  the  proper  development  of  this  beautiful 
section  of  the  Adirondacks  was  impressed  upon  me  many  times 
during  my  residence  in  Albany  as  Conservation  Commissioner. 

Then  I  must  confess  that  as  a  graduate  of  Amherst  College,  I 
feel  a  particular  interest  in  this  park  by  reason  of  the  fact  that 
yonder  ruin  is  what  remains  of  a  fort  erected  in  1759  by  Lord 


'Delivered  at'the  Lake  George  meeting  of  the  New  York   State  Historical 
Association,  October  4,  192 1. 


30 


PRESENTATION  OF  AN  INDIAN  STATUE  31 

JeflFery  Amherst,  wise  and  victorious  British  general  and  patron 
•saint  of  mv  Alma  Mater.  As  most  of  you  know,  he  used  it  as  a 
base  in  his  successful  advance  against  the  French  at  Fort  Ticon- 
deroga. 

In  addition,  from  a  merely  aesthetic  standpoint,  I  could  ask 
for  no  more  appropriate  site  for  the  statue  than  this — at  the  head 
of  mountain-framed  Lake  George,  called  by  the  Iroquois  An-di- 
a-to-roc-te,  "The  Lake  That  Shuts  Itself  In,"  and  well  vaunted  as 
"the  most  beautiful  lake  in  America."  While  beyond  Lake 
George,  stretching  far  to  the  north  and  west,  is  the  whole,  wonder- 
ful, lake-dotted  region  of  the  Adirondack  Mountains,  of  which 
that  section  visible  from  here  is  merely  a  characteristic  and  in- 
tegral part. 

The  statue  which  is  today  formally  dedicated  is  symbolic  of  the 
red  men  who  used  to  roam  the  Adirondacks.  Mr.  A.  Phimister 
Proctor,  of  New  York,  the  sculptor,  selected  as  his  model  the 
finest  type  of  full-blooded  Indian  that  he  could  find.  But  you 
will  note  that  it  is  not  the  fighting  Indian,  with  weapon  of  war 
held  in  readiness  and  lust  in  his  eye  for  the  scalp  of  his  enemy, 
that  the  statue  commemorates. — It  is  the  Indian  of  peace  that  we 
see,  the  Indian  the  hunter,  halting  for  a  moment  in  his  quest  for 
game  to  stoop  for  a  drink  at  one  of  the  springs  or  clear  mountain 
rivulets  with  which  these  forested  slopes  abound. 

Although  history  and  tradition  hold  no  record  of  permanent 
Indian  settlements  in  the  Adirondacks,  it  is  well  known  that  these 
woods  and  lakes  were  favorite  hunting  and  fishing  grounds  of  the 
Iroquois,  and  many  evidences  of  their  ancient  camp  sites  have 
been  discovered.  The  old  Indian  trails,  too,  spread  like  a  net- 
work over  the  wilderness,  some  main  routes  of  travel  worn  deep 
by  constant  use,  others  twisting  and  turning  and  following  the 
lines  of  least  resistance. 

Today,  the  white  vacationists  who  annually  enjoy  the  recreation 
which  this  vast  playground  affords  far  outnumber  the  red  men  who 
used  to  make  it  their  hunting  ground.  Aboriginal  camps  are 
now  the  sites  of  villages,  moccasin  trails  have  become  modem 
highways  and  State  roads.  Yet  we  can  be  everlastinglv  thankful 
that  much  of  the  glorious  Adirondack  landscape  is  still  virtually 
unchanged  since  Indian  days;  that  we  can  still  enjoy  the  thrill  of 
<:arrying  our  canoe  where  the  Indian  carried  his,  and  setting  it 


32  GEORGE  D.  PRATT 

upon  the  I  ke  that  still  appears  to  our  eyes  as  it  appeared  to  his; 
that  we  cai.  still  seek  and  find  many  of  the  birds  and  animals  that 
the  Indian  stalked  with  bow  and  arrow.  And  may  it  long  be  so! 
The  Indian  is  gone  forever  but  these  lakes  and  mountains 
are  in  our  hands,  to  preserve  or  to  destroy.  May  we  be  worthy 
of  the  heritage  that  has  been  left  us,  and  equal  to  the  task  that  is 
before  us! 

George  D.  Pratt  ^ 

speech  of  acceptance  on  behalf  of  the  association 

We  stand  today  on  hallowed  groimd.  Throughout  the  cen- 
turies to  come  there  will  be  pilgrims  here  to  gaze  upon  these 
storied  hills,  so  lovelv  in  themselves  and  clothed  forever  with  a 
mantle  of  richly  human  interest  by  America's  incomparable 
romancer  and  her  great  historian  of  the  woodland  wars.  Like 
the  Scottish  border  and  the  Rhineland,  this  lake  of  history  and 
legend  is  cherished  almost  as  a  personal  possession  by  unnum- 
bered thousands.  To  the  eye  of  memory  the  scene  is  thronged 
with  lingering  ghosts  of  Canadian  woodsmen  and  French  priests 
and  captains  of  English  grenadiers  in  dazzling  scarlet,  of  High- 
land chieftains  in  ancestral  plaids,  of  stolid  German  peasants 
who  marched  bewildered  to  their  death,  and  of  hickory -hearted 
Yankees  who  outmatched  them  all  in  shrewdness  and  in  fortitude. 
But  alwa\-s  in  the  picture,  terrifically  prominent  or  half -concealed, 
t^  ere  is  the  savage  warrior  desperately  involved  in  a  struggle  that 
I  :- could  not  understand.  Suitable  it  is,  then,  that  we  set  up  a 
n.onument  to  him  who  or  ce  claimed  this  ground  as  home,  and 
now  is  gone.  As  French's  "Minute  Man"  at  Concord  and  St. 
Gauden's  "Puritan"  at  Springfield  belong  with  close  propriety 
to  the  places  where  they  stand,  so  Proctor's  "Indian"  is  now 
welcomed  to  his  ancient  haunts,  brought  back  by  the  public 
spirit  of  the  citizen  and  the  skill  and  vision  of  the  artist. 

The  Indian  is  a  fascinating  figure.  Once  hated  by  the  pioneer, 
then  patronized  and  pitied  by  the  poet,  and  finally  studied  as  a 
man  by  the  ethnologist,  he  has  his  place  in  history  and  art  and 
science.  His  sonorous  words  enrich  the  nomenclature  of  our 
country — Adirondack,  Sagamore,  Ticonderoga — and  indeed    our 


•In  the  absence  of  Mr.  Pratt  the  address  was  read  by  his  brother,  Frederic 
B.  Pratt. 


PRESENTATION  OF  AN  INDIAN  STATUE  33 

common  speech,  for  when  we  speak  of  hammocks  or  of  hurricanes, 
of  canoes,  potatoes,  or  full  three  hundred  other  things,  we  speak  the 
language  of  the  red  man.  Now  as  our  scouts  and  camp-fire 
girls  emulate  him  in  his  woodcraft,  he  is  recalled  in  wholesome 
play.  We  eat  his  squash  and  maize,  smoke  his  tobacco,  and  wear 
his  moccasins;  we  imitate  his  art  in  beads  and  rugs  and  baskets. 
He  discovered  and  his  feet  wore  deep  the  trails  upon  which  we 
have  built  our  railroads;  he  was  the  true  "forerunner"  of  our 
pathways.     His  memory  should  not  pass  away. 

Was  it  right  to  take  his  land  ?  The  story  of  his  slow  retreat  is 
full  of  pathos.  No  one  can  now  behold  that  figure  poised  in  its 
grace  and  power,  and  dignified  bv  self-respect,  without  a  sad 
reflection.  His  death-song  has  wrung  the  hearts  of  moralists  and 
poets,  and  his  treatment  has  been  called  the  darkest  blot  upon  our 
history.  The  frontiersman  who  had  to  cope  with  his  ferocity  and 
cunning  doubtless  paid  him  back  with  ruthless  vengeance;  the 
government  seemed  always  impotent  or  faithless  in  the  matter  of 
his  rights.  But  still  I  cannot  think  that  any  other  issue  could 
have  served  the  world  as  well.  It  must  be  remembered  that 
according  to  the  best  conjecture  the  Indian  was  himself  a  squatter 
on  these  acres.  The  Iroquois,  for  one  example,  a  thousand  years 
ago  roamed  through  the  Colimibia  River  valley  to  which  they  had 
com.e  some  time  before  from  Asia.  Between  the  Mississippi  and 
the  Atlantic  it  is  estimated  that  there  were  some  hundred  and 
fiftv  thousand  men  five  centuries  ago,  where  now  there  are  more 
than  sixty  millions,  four  hundred  times  as  manv,  each  with  cer- 
tainty of  life  and  comfort  beyond  the  most  fortunate  Indian 
brave.  In  the  hunting  stage  of  culture  it  takes  fourteen  square 
miles  of  territory,  on  the  average,  to  supply  the  food  of  a  single 
htmian  being.  To  have  resigned  the  rich  potentialities  of  this 
country  to  such  unable  hands  would  have  been  a  crime  against 
posterity.  Between  the  mind  and  manners  of  these  slow-learning 
aborigines  upon  the  one  hand  and  the  white  man's  civilization  on 
the  other,  there  was  such  disparity,  that  the  two  could  not  exist 
together.  Anthropologists  assure  us  that  real  amalgamation 
would  have  been  difficult  indeed  and  eugenists  maintain  that  if  it 
had  been  possible  it  would  have  fatally  debased  the  higher  stock. 
The  Indian  could  not  persist  before  the  white  man's  bullets, 
fire-water  and  small-pox,  nor  could  he  learn   his  customs;  the 


34  DIXON  RYAN  FOX 

immigrant  from  Asia  retreated  before  the  immigrant  from  Europe. 
Our  inability  to  conceive  some  better  alternative  that  was  possible 
reconciles  us  to  the  fact  that  was. 

But  despite  all  this  the  Iroquois  commands  our  admiration. 
We  are  impressed  with  his  sagacity  in  choosing  for  his  home  these 
smiling  valleys  with  their  noble  forests  filled  with  game,  their 
unfailing  waters  and  their  teeming  soil.  It  was  a  land,  as  he 
astutely  noticed,  which  gave  him  a  strategic  place  in  warfare, 
for  by  swift  but  practicable  rivers  he  could  rush  down  upon  his 
enemies  on  every  side  with  fatal  suddenness,  while  they  must 
slowly  push  up  stream  to  him.  A  century  and  a  half  before  the 
Dutch  began  their  settlement  he  had  perfected  a  confederate 
government  which  ranks  him  onh^  with  the  Aztec  in  the  political 
achievements  of  his  race.  He  was,  as  Clinton  called  him,  the 
Roman  of  the  Western  World ;  he  was  the  most  formidable  savage 
warrior  that  the  history  of  man  can  show.  In  honoring  him  with 
this  heroic  statue,  we  m.ark  the  fact  that  he  had  qualities  that  we 
respect. 

It  is  the  function  of  a  monument  to  decorate  and  to  instruct. 
This  splendid  bronze  now  takes  its  place  in  the  gallery  of  American 
art.  It  refines  our  taste  and  adds  new  beauty  to  our  landscape, 
not  for  a  passing  moment  but  for  all  time.  The  inspiration  of  the 
artist  has  become  visible  and  immortal.  So,  too,  it  will  bring 
to  our  children's  children  a  clearer  understanding  of  a  by-gone 
age.  It  illustrates  the  civic  spirit  which  has  led  a  man  of  com- 
fortable fortune  to  give  freely  of  his  time  in  public  service  and  of 
his  wealth  in  such  works  as  this.  Centuries  of  history  are  in- 
dicated here.  It  is  the  figure  of  a  primitive  man;  but  bodied 
forth  by  the  best  art  and  skill  of  our  own  civiHzation.  The 
Indian  gets  water  as  from  a  woodland  spring,  but  we  loiow  the 
stream  is  pumped  here  by  machines.  The  htmter  knew  the  quiet 
of  the  wilderness,  but  now  the  tourists,  passing  almost  in  pro- 
cession, may  leave  their  cars  to  quench  their  thirst  at  this  beneficent 
fountain.  To  the  savage,  fire  and  the  moon  alone  could  drive 
away  the  darkness,  but  now  at  night  this  fine  mem.orial  is  suffused 
in  radiance  from  the  incandescent  filaments  into  which  the  modem 
man  has  poured  the  lightning.  It  is  the  witness  of  philosophy  as 
well  as  history. 

Mr.  Pratt,  on  behalf  of  the  New  York  State  Historical  Associa- 
tion, I  have  the  honor  to  accept  from  your  hands   as   the   gift 


PRESENTATION  OF  AN  INDIAN  STATUE  35 

of  your  distinguished  brother  this  monument.  It  is  a  valued  gift; 
it  will  be  cared  for  and  transmitted  untarnished  and  unharmed 
to  the  succeeding  generations.  Our  thanks,  sir,  and  the  world's 
thanks,  go  to  him  who  adds  an  element  of  beauty  to  the  world. 

Dixon  Ryan  Fox 


THE  BATTLE  OF  DIAMOND  ISLAND^ 

My  paper  refers  to  a  little  known  event  of  the  Burgoyne  cam- 
paign concerned  with  Diamond  Island,  situated  in  Lake  George 
about  three  miles  from  the  place  where  we  are  at  this  moment. 
But  the  significance  of  this  event  can  not  be  understood  without 
realizing  something  of  its  place  in  the  larger  plans  of  which  it  was 
a  minor  and  rather  unexpected  feature.  This  requires  a  brief 
review  of  its  geographical  setting  and  its  place  in  the  strategy 
of  military  operations.  My  subject  is  therefore  somewhat  broader 
than  the  title  assigned  and  deals  with  Lake  George  as  a  military 
highway  with  special  reference  to  the  Burgoyne  expedition. 

The  long  narrow  valley  connecting  the  St.  Lawrence  region 
with  the  lower  Hudson  has  doubtless  been  a  natural  route  of 
travel  from  the  earliest  times,  and  especially  so  when  waterways 
were  the  only  means  of  communication  that  did  not  involve  the 
carrying  of  heavy  packs  on  the  backs  of  the  travellers  themselves. 
This  region  therefore  became  also  an  important  military  highway 
in  the  various  struggles  between  the  French  and  the  English,  and 
later  between  the  English  and  the  Americans  during  the  Revolution. 
For  a  short  distance  only  were  alternative  routes  offered,  namely, 
between  Ft.  Edward  and  Ticonderoga.  One  of  these  routes  was 
b}^  way  of  Lake  George  and  involved  transportation  by  land  to  the 
lake,  easy  water  carriage  to  the  northern  end  of  the  lake,  and 
then  another  portage  to  Lake  Champlain;  the  other,  by  way  of 
Ft.  Anne  and  Whitehall,  though  with  a  much  lower  summit 
level,  involved  portages  to  Wood  Creek  and  no  really  satisfactory 
water    carriage    till    Whitehall    (Skenesborough)    was  reached^. 

During  the  contests  with  the  French,  we  find  a  disposition  to 
use  the  Lake  George  route  for  large  military  movements.  For 
this  purpose  a  m.ilitary  road  was  built  by  Sir  William  Johnson 


'An  Address  delivered  at  the  Lake  George  meeting  of  the  New  York  State 
Historical  Association,  October  4,  1921. 


30 


THE  BATTLE  OF  DIAMOND  ISLAND  37 

from  Ft.  Edward  to  the  lake  in  1755  and  in  this  locaUty  was 
fought  the  battle  of  that  year  in  which  the  French  general  Dieskau 
was  captured,  though  his  army  was  allowed  to  make  its  escape 
to  the  north.-  In  1756,  6,000  men  were  assembled  at  the  head  of 
the  lake  for  an  attack  on  the  French  fort  at  Crown  Point;  in 
1757,  the  French  under  Montcalm  successfully  attacked  Ft. 
William  Henry  by  way  of  the  lake  and  destroyed  it;  in  1758, 
Abercrombie  made  his  ill-fated  attempt  at  Ft.  Ticonderoga  by 
this  same  route;  and  the  following  year  Amherst  again  followed 
the  lake  route  in  his  victorious  campaign  against  Ft.  Ticonderoga 
and  Crown  Point. 

From  this  time  to  the  Revolution  the  region  attracted  a  small 
number  of  settlers,  especially  around  the  northern  end  of  the  lake, 
though  the  English  permitted  the  forts  to  fall  into  decay.  That 
Lake  George  rather  than  Whitehall  was  still  thought  of  as  the  main 
highway  appears  from  various  statements  and  in  particular  from 
a  report  of  Governor  Tr\"on  which  shows  that  men  were  kept  at  the 
south  end  of  the  lake  to  facilitate  the  transportation  of  supplies  to 
Ticonderoga  and  Crown  Points  Mills  were  built  and  lands 
improved  around  Ticonderoga  and  as  early  as  1768  a  small  vessel 
was  placed  on  the  lake  for  the  purpose  of  carrying  freight.*  That 
year  Ft.  George  was  practically  abandoned  and  a  few  yeaxs  later, 
in  1773,  the  fort  at  Crown  Point  was  burned  and  the  works  there 
destroyed,  while  Ft.  Ticonderoga  was  in  so  ruinous  condition  that 
there  was  accommodation  for  no  more  than  about  fifty  men.^ 

This  was  the  situation  at  the  outbreak  of  the  war  in  1775  when 
exciting  events  at  once  happened.  Within  a  month  of  the  Battle 
of  Lexington,  Ft.  Ticonderoga  was  captured  by  New  England 
troops  under  Allen  who  approached  it  by  way  of  Vermont.  At 
this  time  Capt.  John  Nordberg,  who  held  the  titular  position  of 
"Governor  of  Lake  George,"  was  taken  captive  and  sent  into  New 
England.  In  June,  Connecticut  troops  were  stationed  at  both 
ends  of  the  lake ;  and  in  July,  Schuyler,  who  had  been  appointed 
to  the  command  of  the  Northern  Department,  went  down  Lake 
George  and  took  command  of  Ft.  Ticonderoga.  A  portion  of 
Van  Schaick's  regiment  of  the  New  York  Line  reached  the  lake 
that  month  and  were  stationed  at  or  near  Ft.  George  where  thev 
suffered  severely  for  want  of  clothing  and  supplies.  During  that 
summer  Lake  George  must  have  been  a  busy  place  as  the  supplies 


38  PETER  NELSON 

for  the  Canada  expedition  under  Schuyler  and  Montgomery 
were  transported  northwards.  The  events  of  chief  importance 
during  this  year  however  took  place  north  of  Lake  Champlain 
and  are  not  so  directly  connected  with  our  story.  You  will  recall 
that  Montgomery's  army  advanced  to  the  gates  of  Quebec  but 
failed  in  its  attack  at  the  very  close  of  the  year,  an  attack  in 
which  its  distinguished  commander  was  killed.  The  following 
year,  efforts  were  again  made  to  conquer  Canada  but  without 
success.  The  journal  of  one  of  the  commissioners  sent  by  Congress 
to  negotiate  with  the  Canadians  gives  us  a  description  of  the 
boats  used  on  the  lake  which  is  of  interest  in  connection  with  later 
events.  "The  longest  of  the  boats,  made  for  transportation  of 
troops  over  Lakes  George  and  Champlain,  are  thirty-sLx  feet  in 
length  and  eight  feet  wide;  they  draw  about  a  foot  of  water  when 
loaded,  and  carry  between  thirty  and  forty  men,  and  are  rowed  by 
the  soldiers.  They  have  a  mast  fixed  in  them,  to  which  a  square 
sail  or  blanket  is  fastened,  but  these  sails  are  of  no  use,  unless 
with  the  wind  abaft,  or  nearly  so."^  While  the  American  forces 
were  driven  out  of  Canada  and  headquarters  established  no  farther 
away  than  Ft.  Ticonderoga,  there  was  no  serious  attack  on  the 
American  lines  of  communication  during  the  year  in  spite  of 
several  scares  to  that  effect.  About  Ft.  George  were  established 
great  hospitals  for  the  wounded  and  sick,  chiefly  the  latter,  who 
were  so  numerous  that  in  July  3,000  sick,  many  suffering  from 
smallpox  and  typhus,  were  in  these  poorh-  equipped  shelters 
which  had  not  even  the  poor  facilities  generalh'  available  in  that 
age.^ 

This  summary  account  of  events  showing  the  importaace  of 
Lake  George  as  one  section  of  the  principaj  highway  to  Canada 
brings  us  to  the  fateful  summer  of  1777. 

General  Schuyler  was  in  command  in  the  North  and  General 
St.  Clair  in  immediate  charge  of  Ft.  Ticonderoga  and  its  surround- 
ing military  works.  The  forces  at  their  command  were  entirely 
inadequate  to  meet  a  serious  attack  as  St.  Clair  had  only  about 
2,500  Continentals  and  900  Militia,  and  the  forces  at  vSkenes- 
borough.  Ft.  Anne,  Ft.  Edward  and  Albany  were  composed  of 
small  miHtia  detachments  only.  The  works  at  Ft.  Ticonderoga 
had  been  strengthened  and  new  works  built  on  Motmt  Inde- 
pendence on  the  eastern  side  of  the  narrows  and  connected  with 


THE  BATTLE  OF  DIAMOND  ISLAND  39 

Ft.  Ticonderoga  by  a  bridge  of  boats  supposedly  protected  by  a 
boom  constructed  with  great  labor.  Mount  Defiance  was  thought 
to  be  out  of  gunshot  and  despite  warnings  was  not  fortified,  partly 
because  of  lack  of  troops  as  the  lines  would  have  called  for  10,000 
men  as  laid  out. 

To  attack  these  fortifications  and  force  his  way  to  Albany, 
there  to  unite  with  Howe's  force  from  the  South  and  St.  Leger's 
from  the  west  by  way  of  Oswego  and  the  Mohawk  valley,  and  so 
divide  New  England  from  the  central  and  southern  colonies, 
Burgoyne  brought  a  force  of  4,000  British  regulars,  3,000  German 
troops,  besides  Canadians  and  Indians,  a  total  force  of  over  8,000 
men,  well  equipped  and  with  an  abundance  of  artillery.  Of  the 
events  at  the  northern  end  of  the  lake,  it  is  sufficient  to  give  the 
barest  outlines.  The  failure  to  fortify  Mount  Defiance  proved 
disastrous  and  it  was  quickly  seized  by  the  British  so  that  St. 
Clair  was  obliged  to  evacuate  his  positions  without  any  real 
attack  and  to  abandon  all  his  heavy  artillery.  Some  of  the 
lighter  artillery,  stores  and  provisions  were  loaded  on  boats  and 
sent  up  the  lake  to  Skenesborough  under  escort  but  the  absence  of 
any  road  along  Lake  Champlain  at  this  point  made  it  necessary 
for  the  main  army  to  retreat  to  the  east  and  to  seek  the  same  point 
by  way  of  Hubbardton  and  Castleton  in  Vermont.  Unfortunately 
the  defences  across  the  narrows  of  Lake  Champlain  proved  no 
serious  hindrance  and  the  forces  retreating  up  the  lake  were 
quickly  followed  and  attacked  at  Skenesborough  that  same  day 
so  that  Colonel  Long^  was  forced  to  destroy  his  stores  and  continue 
his  retreat  up  Wood  Creek  to  Ft.  Anne  where  an  engagement  took 
place  next  day.  On  the  arrival  of  British  reinforcements,  the 
fort  was  burned  and  the  retreat  continued  to  Ft.  Edward.  Mean- 
while the  loss  of  Skenesborough  had  obliged  St.  Clair  to  make  a 
ftirther  detour  to  the  south  and  east^  and  he  did  not  reach  the 
front  of  the  enemy  till  a  week  later  when  he  arrived  at  Ft.  Edward, 
having  suffered  severe  losses  in  the  rearguard  action  known  as  the 
Battle  of  Hubbardton. 

Burgoyne  had  intended  to  proceed  by  way  of  Lake  George, 
though  mindful  of  the  alternative  route  and  also  of  its  difficulties, 
as  is  clearly  shown  in  his  "Thoughts  for  conducting  the  war  from 
the  side  of  Canada."     In  one  place  he  says: 


40  PETER  NELSON 

"I  will  suppose  him  also  to  occupy  Lake  George  with  a  consider- 
able naval  strength,  in  order  to  secuie  his  retreat,  and  afterwards 
to  retard  the  campaign;  and  it  is  natural  to  expect  that  he  will 
take  measuies  to  block  up  the  roads  from  Ticonderoga  to  Albany 
by  the  way  of  Skenesborough,  by  fortifying  the  stiong  groimd  at 
different  places,  and  thereby  obliging  the  King's  army  to  carry  a 
weight  of  artillery  with  it;  and,  b}^  felling  trees,  breaking  bridges, 
and  other  obvious  impediments,  to  delay,  though  he  should  not 
have  power  or  spirit  finally  to  resist,  its  progress."^" 

Recumng  again  to  this  point  some  pages  further  on  he  says: 

"The  next  measure  must  depend  upon  those  taken  by  the  enemy, 
and  upon  the  general  plan  of  the  campaign  as  concerted  at  home. 
If  it  be  determined  that  General  Howe's  whole  forces  should  act 
upon  Hudson's-River,  and  to  the  southward  of  it,  and  that  the 
only  object  of  the  Canada  army  be  to  eft'ect  a  junction  with  that 
force,  the  immediate  possession  of  Lake  George  would  be  of  great 
consequence,  as  the  most  expeditious  and  most  commodious  route 
to  Albany;  and,  should  the  enemy  be  in  force  upon  that  lake, 
which  is  veiy  probable,  every  effort  should  be  tried,  by  throwing 
savages  and  light  troops  round  it,  to  oblige  them  to  quit  it  without 
waiting  for  naval  preparations.  Should  those  efforts  fail,  the 
loute  by  South-Bay  and  Skenesborough  might  be  attempted; 
but  considerable  difficulties  m.ay  be  expected,  as  the  narrow  parts 
of  the  river  miay  be  easily  choked  up  and  rendered  impassible; 
and,  at  best,  there  will  be  necessity  for  a  gieat  deal  of  land -carriage 
for  the  artillery,  provision,  &c.  which  can  only  be  supplied  from 
Canada.  In  case  of  success  also  b}^  that  route,  and  the  enemy 
not  removed  from  Lake  Geoige,  it  will  be  necessaiy  to  leave  a 
chain  of  posts,  as  the  army  proceeds,  for  the  securities  of  your 
communication,  which  m.ay  too  m.uch  M^eaken  so  sm.all  an  army. 

"Lest  all  these  attempts  should  unavoidably  fail,  and  it  become 
indispensably  necessary  to  attack  tlie  enemy  by  water  upon  Lake 
George,  the  army,  at  the  out-set,  should  be  provided  with  cariiages, 
implem.ents,  and  artificers,  for  conveying  aimed  vessels  from 
Ticonderoga  to  the  lake."" 

Later  in  a  Journal  despatched  from  Skenesborough  on  July 
11th,  after  he  had  decided  to  take  the  main  army  over  that  route 
he  again  refers  to  the  two  routes  in  these  terms: 

"Roads  are  opening  for  the  army  to  march  to  them  [the  enemy 
at  Ft.  Edward]  by  Fort  Anne,  and  the  Wood  Creek  is  clearing  of 
fallen  trees,  sunken  stones,  and  other  obstacles,  to  give  passage  to 
bateaux  foi  carrying  artillery,  stores,  provisions,  and  camp  equip- 
age. These  are  laboiious  works,  but  the  spirit  and  zeal  of  the 
troops  are  sufficient  to  surmount  them..     Some  little  time  must 


THE  BATTLE  OF  DIAMOND  ISLAND  41 

also  be  allowed  for  the  supplies  of  provisions  to  overtake  us.  In 
the  mean  time  all  possible  diligence  is  using  at  Ticonderoga  to 
get  the  gun-boats,  provision-vessels,  and  a  proper  quantity  of 
bateaux,  into  Lake  George.  A  corps  of  the  army  will  be  ordered 
to  penetiate  by  that  route,  which  will  after^-ards  be  the  route  for 
the  magazines;  and  a  junction  of  the  whole  is  intended  at  Fort 
Edward."^- 

The  direction  of  the  American  retreat  had  forced  an  initial 
change  in  Burgoyne's  plans  since  the  main  part  of  his  army  under 
his  personal  direction  had  followed  Long's  force  to  Skenesborough. 
His  defence  of  his  continuance  on  this  route  m.ay  be  given  in  his 
own  words  as  found  in  his  Narrative. 

"Question  has  been  made  by  those  who  began  at  this  period  to 
arraign  my  military  conduct,  whether  it  would  not  have  been 
more  expedient  for  the  purpose  of  rapidity,  to  have  fallen  back  to 
Ticonderoga,  in  order  to  take  the  convenient  route  by  Lake 
George,  than  to  have  persevered  in  the  laboiious  and  difificult 
course  by  land  to  Fort  Edward?  My  m.otives  for  preferiing  the 
latter  were  these:  I  considered  not  only  the  general  iir.pressions 
which  a  retrograde  motion  is  apt  to  make  upon  the  minds  of  both 
enemies  and  friends,  but  also,  that  the  natural  conduct  of  the 
enemy  in  that  case  would  be  to  remain  at  Fort  George,  as  their 
retreat  could  not  then  be  cut  off,  in  order  to  oblige  m.e  to  open 
trenches,  and  consequently  to  delay  me,  and  in  the  mean  time 
they  would  have  destroyed  the  road  from  Fort  George  to  Fort 
Edward.  On  the  other  hand,  by  persisting  to  penetrate  by  the 
short  cut  from.  Fort  Anne,  of  which  I  was  then  master,  to  Fort 
Edward,  though  it  was  attended  with  great  labour,  and  many 
alert  situations,  the  troops  were  improved  in  the  very  essential 
point  of  wood  service;  I  effectually  dislodged  the  enemy  from 
Fort  George  without  a  blow:  and  seeing  me  master  of  one  com- 
m.unication,  they  did  not  think  it  worth  while  to  destroy  the  other. 

"The  great  num.ber  of  boats  also,  which  must  necessarily  have 
been  em.ployed  for  the  transport  of  the  tioops  ovei  Lake  George, 
were  by  this  course  spared  for  the  transport  of  the  provision, 
artilleiy,  and  ammunition. 

"The  success  answered  this  reasoning  in  every  point;  for  by 
the  vigilance  of  General  Phillips,  to  whom  I  had  com.mitted  the 
important  part  of  forwarding  all  the  necessaries  from  Ticonderoga, 
a  great  embarkation  aiTived  at  Fort  George  on  July  29th.  I 
took  possession  of  the  country  near  Fort  Edwaid  on  the  sam.e  day, 
and  independently  of  other  advantages,  I  found  myself  much  more 
forward  in  point  of  time  than  I  could  possibly  have  been  by  the 
other  route. 


42  PETER  NELSON 

"Another  material  motive,  which  could  not  be  known  by  stran- 
gers who  have  reasoned  upon  this  movement,  was,  that  during 
the  time  m\'  army  was  employed  in  clearing  Wood-Creek  and 
cutting  roads,  and  the  corps  under  Major-general  Phillips  was 
working  to  pass  the  transports  over  Lake  George,  I  was  enabled 
to  detach  a  large  corps  to  my  left,  under  Major-general  Riedesel, 
and  therebv  assist  my  purpose  of  giving  jealousy  to  Connecticut, 
and  keeping  in  check  the  whole  country  called  the  Hampshire 
Grants.  .  . 

"On  the  airival  of  the  army  at  Foit  Edward,  the  great  object 
of  attention  was  the  transports  fiom.  Fort  George.  The  distance 
was  about  sixteen  miles,  the  roads  wanting  great  repair,  the 
weather  unfavourable,  the  cattle  and  carriages  scarce;  part  of  the 
latter  inconvenience  was  occasioned  b}^  the  number  of  both  that 
were  necessaiily  detained  at  Ticonderoga,  for  the  purpose  of 
dragging  the  boats  and  the  provisions  over  the  carrying-places, 
between  Lake  Champlain  and  Lake  George:  .  .  ."'^ 

With  the  vahdity  of  these  arguments  we  are  not  deeply  con- 
cerned, though  it  is  perfectly  evident  that  unnecessary  baggage, 
not  necessary  for  military  purposes,  was  caniedall  the  way  to 
Saratoga.^^  After  the  artillery  boats,  bridge  material,  etc.,  had 
with  great  difficulty  been  transported  to  Ft.  Edward  and  sufficient 
supply  of  provisions  accimiulated  at  that  point  so  that  he  coiild 
move  without  immediate  dependence  for  daily  supply  by  the  long 
line  from  Canada,  Burgoyne  advanced  and  soon  met  a  force  which 
nov/  outmmibered  him. 

To  place  the  following  events  in  their  proper  relation  to  those 
taking  place  to  the  south,  let  us  recall  that  on  the  13th  and  14th 
of  September'^  Burgoyne  crossed  from  the  east  to  the  west  side  of 
the  Hudson  and  encam-ped  on  the  heights  and  in  the  plain  of 
Saratoga  (Schu^-lerville)  and  that  on  the  19th  was  fought  the  first 
Battle  of  Saratoga,  the  second  following  on  the  7th  of  October. 

The  British  lines  of  communication  though  lightly  held  had  not 
been  abandoned  and  an  opportunity  presented  itself  to  destroy 
them-,  capture  his  supplies,  and  make  difficult  his  retreat  to  Canada. 
At  this  time  General  Lincoln  was  in  New  England  engaged  in 
gathering  militia  for  the  ensuing  campaign.  The  origin  of  the  plan 
for  an  attack  to  the  north  of  Burgoyne's  main  anny  seems  to  have 
arisen  with  General  Lincoln  and  General  Stark  on  the  receipt  of  a 
letter  from.  General  Gates  on  the  19th  of  August.  In  a  later 
account  to  Colonel  John  Laurens  of  the  events  of  this  campaign, 
General  Lincoln  wrote  as  follows : 


THE  BATTLE  OF  DIAMOND  ISLAND  43 

"We  were  fully  of  opinion,  that  a  body  of  militia  should  be 
collected  in  the  Grants,  and  move  in  the  rear  of  General  Burgoyne, 
as  this  m.easure  would  oblige  him  to  make  heavy  detachments  to 
secure  the  seveial  posts  necessary  to  cover  his  rear,  on  the  doing  of 
which  the  salvation  of  his  aimy  might  depend.  He  would  also 
be  obliged  to  escort  his  provision-wagons,  which  would  serve  to 
weaken  his  main  body,  as  General  Gates  would  have  little  to 
fear  in  fiont.  Besides,  this  movement  would  cover  a  large  and 
valuable  country,  filled  with  provisions,  and  restrain  the  un- 
friendly."^^ 

This  plan  was  agreed  to  and  the  troops  which  had  been  collected 
were  moved  northward  to  Manchester  on  the  7th  and  to  Pawlet 
on  the  Sth,  where  a  halt  was  made.^''  General  Lincoln's  letter 
continues  as  follows: 

"On  the  13th,  our  little  army  being  collected,  which  consisted 
of  two  thousand  five  hundred  men,  and  the  stores  being  arrived, — 
to  execute  our  general  plan,  which  was  to  annoy,  divide,  and 
distiact  the  enemy.  Colonel  Brown  was  sent  with  five  hundred 
men  across  the  Narrows  (part  of  Lake  Champlain,  or,  as  it  is 
sometimes  called,  South  Bay),  to  the  north  end  of  Lake  George, 
with  instiuctions  to  destroy  all  the  boats  and  stores  there  belong- 
ing to  the  enem.y,  and,  if  possible,  to  relieve  our  prisoners  at  that 
post.^^  Colonel  Johnson^^  was  ordered,  with  a  like  number  of 
men,  to  Mount  Independence,  with  instructions  to  attempt  that 
post,  to  favor  the  designs  of  Colonel  Brown.  Colonel  Wood- 
bridge-"  was  ordered  with  five  hundied  men  to  Skenesborough, 
wdth  instructions  to  proceed  to  Fort  Anne,  and  from  thence  to 
attempt  the  enemy's  post  at  the  Mills,  if  it  could  be  done  without 
risking  too  much.  Hereby  he  became  a  cover  to  Colonel  Brown, 
and  secured  his  retreat,  if  nothing  more  could  be  effected,  In 
order  to  give  despatch  to  these  enterprises,  and  ease  to  the  troops, 
the  hoise,  w^hich  I  wrote  for  from  Beikshire  to  come  on  with  sacks, 
having  arrived,  they  were  divided  among  the  three  commands,  and 
took  on  the  flour.  The  beeves  were  kept  on  foot.  A  number 
of  militia  light-horse  were  ordered  on,  with  their  saddlebags 
filled  with  spare  cartridges.  Thus  the  men  moved  very  light, 
and  with  great  despatch. 

"On  the  17th,  after  leaving  four  hundred  men  to  cover  the  stores 
at  Pawlet,  I  moved  with  six  hundied  towards  Skenesborough,  in 
order  to  join  Colonel  Woodbridge,  the  more  effectually  to  cover 
Colonel  Brown;  at  which  post  I  intended  Colonels  Brown  and 
Johnson  should  join  me,  in  order  to  move  in  force  into  the  rear  of 
General  Burgo\Tie. 

"Colonel  Johnson  arrived  in  time  before  Mount  Independence, 
and  remained  there  a  number  of  days;  but,  finding  the  enemy 


44  PETER  NELSON 

too  well  covered  to  attempt  an  assault  with  a  probability  of  success, 
he  returned  when  ordered.  The  enemy  having  evacuated  their 
posts  in  their  rear,  it  became  unnecessary  for  Colonel  Woodbridge 
to  proceed  farther  than  Skenesborough.  Colonel  Brown's  success 
you  have  fully  represented  in  the  following  extracts  from  his 
report  to  me."^" 

On  the  19th, -^  General  Burgoyne  having  entirely  neglected  his 
rear,  the  troops  under  General  Lincoln,  who  were  on  their  way  to 
Skenesborough  (where  the  general  had  already  arrived),  were 
ordered  to  return  to  Pawlet  and  shortly  thereafter  were  marched  to 
Stillwater. 

This  brings  us  to  Colonel  Brown's  expedition  with  which  we  are 
more  particularly  concerned.  Here  we  properly  pause  for  a  sketch 
of  the  chief  figure  of  the  expedition.  According  to  his  most  recent 
biographer,  Archibald  M.  Howe,  (in  an  address  at  Palatine  Bridge, 
29  September  1908), =2  John  Brown,  of  Pittsfield,  was  bom  19 
October  1744  and  was  therefore  about  33  years  old  at  the  date  of 
these  events;  he  was  a  graduate  of  Yale,  practised  law  for  a  few 
months  in  Tryon  county,  New  York,  but  shortly  returned  to 
Pittsfield,  served  in  several  prominent  civil  capacities  during  the 
Revolution,  was  at  the  capture  of  Ft.  Ticonderoga  in  1775,  par- 
ticipated in  the  invasion  of  Canada  as  m.ajor,  was  lieutenant 
colonel  of  a  Connecticut  regiment  of  the  line  in  1776-77  while 
it  was  stationed  at  Albany  and  later  at  Ft.  Stanwix,  resigning 
about  18  May  1777.  In  September  of  that  year  we  find  him  in 
command  of  a  regiment  of  Massachusetts  militia  and  shall  hear 
further  of  his  exploits.  Nothing  seems  to  be  written  of  his  life 
from  October  of  that  year  till  1780  when  he  went  to  the  defense  of 
the  Mohawk  valley  with  Massachusetts  troops  and  was  killed  in 
the  Battle  of  Stone  Arabia,  on  his  36th  birthday. 

Leaving  Pawlet  on  the  13th  we  find  him  writing  from  Poultney 
on  the  same  day  and  reporting  that  he  expects  to  be  in  Castleton 
on  the  morrow  by  10  o'clock  P.  M.^^  The  following  morning  he 
again  writes  from  Poultney  to  General  Lincoln  and  expresses 
apprehension  because  of  the  delay  to  a  detachment  under  Colonel 
Warner.  The  next  report  which  we  have  of  his  proceedings  is 
contained  in  his  letter  to  Colonel  Johnson  dated  Lake  George 
Landing,  IS  September  1777.  From  this  report,  as  well  as  from 
the  later  report  which  he  wrote  on  the  4th  of  October  to  some 
unnamed  general,  it  is  clear  that  he  proceeded  by  way  of  the 


THE  BATTLE  OF  DIAMOND  ISLAND  45 

vicinity  of  Skenesborough  and  at  that  point  crossed  over  the 
southern  extension  of  Lake  Champlain  so  as  to  reach  the  point  of 
attack  from  the  southwest  near  Mount  Defiance.  The  outHnes  of 
his  attack  are  hkewise  given  in  his  report  of  the  same  day  to  General 
Lincoln  which  being  somewhat  fuller  in  its  details  I  quote  as 
follows : 

"North  end  of  lake  George  landing 

Thursday  Sep  ISth  1777 
"Sii, 

"With  great  fatigue  after  marching  all  last  night  I  ai  rived  at  this 
place  at  the  break  of  day,  and  after  the  best  disposition  of  the  men, 
I  could  make,  immediately  began  the  attack,  and  in  a  few  minutes, 
carried  the  place.  I  then  without  any  loss  of  time  detached  a 
considerable  part  of  my  men  to  the  mills,  w^here  a  greater  number 
of  the  enemy  were  posted,  who  also  were  soon  made  prisoners,  a 
small  number  of  whom  having  taken  possession  of  a  block  house  in 
that  Vicinity  were  with  more  difficulty  bro't  to  submission;  but 
at  the  sight  of  a  Cannon  they  sui rendered.  During  this  season  of 
success.  Mount  Defiance  also  fell  into  our  hands.  I  have  taken 
possession  of  the  old  french  lines  at  Ticonderoga,  and  have  sent  a 
flag  dem.anding  surrender  of  Ty:  and  mount  independence 
in  stiong  and  perem.ptory  terms.  I  have  had  as  yet  no  infor- 
mation of  the  event  of  Colo.  Johnsons  attack  on  the  mount. 
My  loss  of  men  in  these  several  actions  are  not  more  than  3  or  4 
killed  and  5  wounded.  The  enemy's  loss:  is  less.  I  find  m^^self 
in  possession  of  293  prisoners.  Vizt  2  captains,  9  subs.  2  Com- 
missaries, non  Commissioned  officers  and  piivates  143.  British, 
119  Canadians,  18  artificers  and  retook  more  than  100  of  our  m.en. 
total  293,  exclusive  of  the  prisoners  retaken. — The  watercraft  I 
have  taken,  is  150  batteaus  below  the  falls  on  Lake  Champlain  50 
above  the  falls  including  17  gun  boats  and  one  armed  sloop. 
Arms  equal  to  the  number  of  prisoners.  Some  am.munition  and 
many  other  things  which  I  cannot  now  ascertain.  I  m.ust  not 
forget  to  mention  a  few  Cannon  which  m.ay  be  of  great  service 
to  us.  Tho :  my  success  has  hitherto  answered  m_y  most  sanguine 
expectations,  I  cannot  promise  m\^self  great  things,  the  events  of 
war  being  so  dubious  in  their  nature,  but  shall  do  my  best  to  distress 
the  enemy  all  in  my  powei,  having  regard  to  my  retreat, — There 
is  but  a  small  quantity  of  provisions  at  this  place  which  I  think 
will  necessitate  my  retreat  in  case  we  do  not  carry  Ty  and  in- 
dependence— I  hope  you  will  use  your  utmost  endeavor  to  give  me 
assistance  should  I  need  in  crossing  the  lake  &c. — The  enemy  but 
a  very  small  force  at  fort  George.  Their  boats  aie  on  an  island 
about  14  miles  from  this  guarded  by  six  companies,  having  artil- 
lgj.y24 — J   have  m_uch   fear  with   respect  to  the   prisoners,   being 


46  PETER  NELSON 

obliged  to  send  them  under  a  small  guard. — I  am  well  informed 
that  considerable  reinforcements  is  hourly  expected  at  the  lake 
under  command  of  Sir  John  Johnson. — This  minute  received  Genl. 
Powals  answer  to  my  demand  in  these  woids,  "The  garrison  in- 
trusted to  my  charge  I  shall  defend  to  the  last."  Indeed  I  have 
little  hopes  of  putting  him  to  the  necessity  of  giving  it  up  unless 
by  the  force  under  Colonel  Johnson. 

I  am  & 
Genl.     Lincoln.  John  Brown." 

On  the  19th  he  reported  again  to  General  Lincoln  and  stated  his 
intention  of  crossing  to  Mount  Independence  and  in  conjunction 
with  General  Warner-^  (who  had  come  to  the  support  of  Colonel 
Johnson)  attacking  that  post.  He  also  states  in  this  letter,  what 
is  of  particular  interest,  that  before  the  attack  of  the  previous  day 
he  had  promised  all  the  plunder  to  the  men  for  an  encouragement 
to  them  in  their  attack.  On  this  date  he  also  wrote  to  General 
Warner  giving  him  a  general  statement  of  his  situation. 

On  the  evening  of  the  20th  we  find  him  once  more  reporting  to 
General  Lincoln  from  Lake  George  landing,  in  which  he  reported 
the  addition  of  about  20  prisoners  taken  in  3  boats  which  came 
from  Ft.  George  and  the  sending  off  of  160  prisoners  to  General 
Warner.  On  further  consideration  he  had  decided  not  to  attack 
Ft.  Ticonderoga,  since  the  capture  would  be  without  much  im- 
portance so  long  as  Mount  Independence  was  held  by  the  enemy, 
and  that  Mount  seemed  to  be  so  strongly  fortified  as  to  make  it 
impracticable  to  seize  it.  This  letter  also  shows  the  origin  of  the 
plan  for  the  Lake  George  expedition,  which  he  at  once  proceeded 
to  put  into  effect.     On  this  point  he  writes : 

"By  intelligence  from  up  the  Lake  I  am  suie  that  I  shall  have 
it  in  my  Power  to  command  this  Lake.  The  Enemy  have  a  Post 
at  Dimond  Islelandt  consisting  of  3  Companies  of  German 
Troops,  and  almost  all  the  Boats  in  the  lake  exclusive  of  those  I 
have  taken.  They  have  but  little  Provision  and  cannot  be  rein- 
forced or  supplyed  from  this  Ouaiter.  vShall  indeavour  to  set  out 
tomorrow  morning  with  a  small  Sloop  Mounting  3  Carriage  Guns 
7  pounds,  one  Gun  Boat  with  one  Brass  IS  Do.  in  hei  Bow  and  one 
other  Boat  Mounting  one  7  Do.  and  about  400  Men  in  Boats.  I 
can  Retreat  much  easier  fiom  20  Miles  up  the  Lake  then  from  this 
Place.  Do  not  mean  however  to  abandon  this  Place  unless 
necessitated  to  do  it  untill  the  Event  of  this  Expedition  is  known — " 

In  various  letters  both  Lincoln  and  Brown  refer  to  the  fact  that 
advices  were  interfered  with,  expresses  cut  oft",  so  that  they  were 


THE  BATTLE  OF  DIAMOND  ISLAND  47 

not  in  close  touch  with  each  other;  and  from  a  letter  of  Lincoln 
to  Brown  of  the  21st  dated  at  Pawlet  it  is  plain  that  he  had  been  at 
Skenesborough  and  was  then,  under  express  orders  of  Gates, 
proceeding  southward  leaving  Colonel  Brown  and  General  Warner 
to  act  on  their  own  judgments  with  reference  to  the  northern 
attack.  26 

The  next  letter  from  Colonel  Brown  is  dated  from  Skenesbor- 
ough, September  26th,  and  is  a  straightforward  account  of  the 
attack,  which  is  perhaps  too  much  dignified  by  calHng  it  a  battle 
but  which  was  certainly  more  than  a  mere  skirmish.  As  this 
attack  is  the  topic  of  my  paper  it  may  be  well  to  quote  the  report 
in  full: 

"Skeensboro  Friday  11  o'clock,  a.  va.  Sept.  26th  1777 
"Dear  Sir: 

"I  this  minute  arrived  at  this  place  by  the  way  of  Foit  Ann, 
was  induced  to  take  this  rout  on  act  of  my  Ignorance  of  the  situa- 
tion of  eveiy  part  of  the  continental  Army. — 

"On  the  22  inst  at  4  o'clk  P.  M.  I  set  sail  from,  the  north  end 
Lake  George  with  20  sail  of  Boats  three  of  which  were  armed,  Viz 
one  sm.all  sloop  mounting  3  guns,  and  2  British  Gun  Boats  having 
on  Board  the  whole  about  420  Men  officeis  included  with  a  De- 
termined resolution  to  attack  Diamond  Island  which  lies  w'thin  5 
miles  Fort  George  at  the  break  of  Day  the  next  Morning,  but  a 
very  heavy  storm  com.ing  on  prevented. — I  arrived  Sabbath  Day 
point  abt  midnight  where  I  tarried  all  night,  during  which  time  I 
[lost  a]  small  Boat  in  the  fleet  taken  the  Day  before  coming  from 
Foit  George,  conducted  by  one  -Ferry  [this  name  is  elsewhere 
given  as  Terry]  lately  a  sutler  in  our  arm_y,  I  put  Ferry  on  his 
Parole,  but  in  the  night  he  fotmd  Means  to  escape  with  his  Boat, 
and  informed  the  Enemy  of  our  approach,  on  the  23d  I  advanced  as 
far  as  12  Mile  Island,  the  Wind  continuing  too  high  for  an  attack 
I  suspended  it  untill  the  Morning  of  the  24th  at  9  oclock  at  w^hich 
Time  I  advanced  w4th  the  3  armed  Boats  in  front  and  the  othei 
Boats,  I  ordeied  to  wing  to  the  Right  and  left  of  Island  to  attempt  a 
landing  if  practicable,  and  to  support  the  Gun  Boats  in  case  they 
should  need  assistance,  I  was  induced  to  make  this  experiment  to 
find  the  strength  of  the  Island  as  also  to  cany  it  if  practicable. — 
The  enemy  gave  m.e  the  first  fire  which  I  returned  in  good  earnest, 
and  advanced  as  nigh  as  I  thought  prudent,  I  soon  found  that  the 
enemy  had  been  advertised  of  our  approach  and  well  prepared  for 
our  reception  having  a  great  number  of  cannon  well  mounted  with 
good  Breast  Works,  I  however  approached  within  a  smiall  Distance 
giving  the  Enemy  as  hot  a  fiie  as  in  my  Power,  untill  the  sloop  was 
hulled  between  wind  and  Water  and  obliged  to  toe  her  ofif  and  one 


48  PETER  NELSON 

of  the  boats  so  damaged  as  I  was  obliged  to  quit  her  in  the  action. 
I  had  two  men  killed  two  Moi tally  wounded  and  several  others 
wounded  in  such  Manner  as  I  was  obliged  to  leave  them  undei  the 
Care  of  the  Inhabitants,  who  I  had  taken  Prisoneis  giving  them 
a  sufRcient  reward  for  theii  services. 

"I  Run  my  Boats  up  a  Bay^'  a  considerable  distance  and  burnt 
them  with  all  the  Baggage  that  was  not  portable — The  Enemy 
have  on  Diamond  Island  as  near  as  could  be  collected  are  about 
three  hundred,  and  about  40  at  Fort  George  with  orders  if  they  are 
attacked  to  retreat  to  the  Island— Genl  Borgoine  has  about  4 
Weeks  Provision  with  his  army  and  no  more,  he  is  determined  to 
cut  his  Road  through  to  Alban}^  at  all  events,  for  this  I  have  the 
last  authoiit}-,  still  I  think  him  under  a  small  mistake — Most  of  the 
Horses  and  Cattle  taken  at  Ty  and  thereabouts  weie  left  in  the 
Woods.     Genl  Warner  has  put  out  a  party  in  quest  of  them. 

"I  am  Dear  vSr  wishing  you  and  the  Alain  Army  great  Success 

your  most  obt  Ymml  Sert 
Genl  Lincoln  Jno  Brown" 

His  later  report  to  an  unnamed  general, ^^  who  may  well  have 
been  Gates,  dated  at  Pawlet,  October  4th,  again  refers  to  this 
matter  and  as  corroborative  evidence  written  a  week  later  may  al- 
so be  quoted  on  this  point: 

"By  the  Boats  that  come  in  dayly  from  Fort  George  and 
Diamond  Island,  I  found  that  the  Island  were  not  apprized  of  us 
and  therefore  determined  that  it  was  my  Object  rather  than  Ty  I 
therefore  after  Canonading  the  old  Fort  a  Considerable  Time, 
from  within  the  old  French  Lines  and  from  m.ount  defiance,  from 
which  with  one  Ball  two  Men  within  the  Parade  were  killed,  and 
after  having  destroyed  all  the  Carriges  and  Boats  except  20  in 
lake  Geoige  and  after  having  burnt  most  of  the  Stores  about 
Ticonderoga  and  killed  and  sent  off  all  the  Cattle  and  Horses,  on 
the  24th  I  imbarked  for  the  Island,  having  5  Cannon  mounted  on 
the  small  sloop  and  gun  Boats,  but  an  unluky  Circum.stance 
happened;  One  Teriy  lately  a  sutler  in  our  Army  being  a  Prisoner, 
I  suffered  him  to  go  at  large  on  Parole  but  on  my  sailing  from  the 
landing  I  ordered  Terry  &  his  Associates  on  board  the  Gun  Boats, 
unhappily  an  Officer  coming  on  in  the  rear  ordeied  Teny  out  of 
the  Gun  Boats  into  his  own  Boat  and  fall  under  his  stern,  altho 
this  Officer  had  no  bad  intent  in  this  Order  yet  it  Pioved  oui 
overthrow  at  the  Island,  for  Night  coming  on  with  a  great  Storm 
Terry  m^ade  his  Escape  to  the  Enem.y  which  gave  them  sufficient 
Oppertunity  to  mount  their  Cannon  and  Prepare  foi  our  reception[.] 
I  however  Proceeded  and  made  the  Attempt,  but  finding  the 
Enemy  too  well  Prepared  was  obliged  to  quit  after  two  hours 
Engagement,  in  which  the  Enemy  huld  the  sloop  between  wind 


Col. John  Browns 
expedition  177 J 

aqai77.st 

Ft  "Ttconderoga  & 
Diamond  IsUtJZ^ 

Rout€5 

Roads 
Col  Brown 


Col  Johnson        ( 
Col  Woodbridgc) 


10   MILES 


DIAMOND 
ISLAND 


THE  BATTLE  OF  DIAMOND  ISLAND  49 

and  water  in  such  Manner  I  was  obliged  to  toe  her  off,  one  of  the 
Gun  Boats  also  being  Wounded  and  many  other  Boats  shattered 
to  Pieces,  I  thought  Pioper  to  retreat  and  aftei  having  burned  all 
the  boats  on  the  East  shore  quit  the  Lake  and  got  safely  into 
Skeensboio',  I  left  behind  me  in  the  whole  killed  and  wounded  ten 
Men — ^the  Numbei  of  Piisoneis  on  Parole  shall  transmit  your 
honor  very  soon." 

From  British  sources  we  get  various  statements  which  enable  us 
to  form  a  more  complete  conception  of  the  events  connected  with 
this  attack.  Three  of  these  are  perhaps  of  special  importance. 
The  general  in  command  of  the  German  troops  Major  general 
Riedesel,  has  the  following  statement  in  his  Journal : 

"All  the  heavy  baggage  of  the  different  regiments  was  sent  back 
to  Ticonderoga  on  the  1st  of  Septembei.  Those  articles,  however, 
which  might  be  more  needed,  were  only  sent  back  as  far  as  Dia- 
mond Island  in  Lake  George — seven  [should  be  three]  miles  from 
Fort  Geoige — that  they  might  be  close  at  hand  in  case  of  need. 
At  the  same  time  two  companies  of  the  47th  Regiment  were  sent 
with  them  as  a  garrison;  only  thirty  men  and  one  officer  being 
left  at  Fort  George,  as  the  communication  with  that  lake  was  to 
be  given  up  for  the  present.  "^^ 

The  battle  itself  was  reported  by  Burgoyne  in  his  letter  of  20 
October  1777  which  contained  the  following  paragraphs: 

"On  the  24th  instant  [should  be  September],  the  enemy,  enabled, 
by  the  capture  of  the  gunboats  and  bateaux,  which  they  had  made 
after  the  surprise  of  the  sloop,  to  embark  upon  Lake  George, 
attacked  Diamond  Island  in  two  divisions. 

"Captain  Aubrey,  and  two  companies  of  the  47th  regiment, 
had  been  posted  at  that  island  from  the  time  the  army  passed  the 
Hudson's  River,  as  a  better  situation,  for  the  security  of  the  stores 
at  the  south  end  of  Lake  George,  than  Fort  George,  which  is  on 
the  continent,  and  not  tenable  against  artillery  and  numbers. 
The  enemy  weie  repulsed  by  Captain  Aubrey  with  gieat  loss,  and 
puisued  by  the  gun-boats  under  his  command,  to  the  east  shoie, 
where  two  of  their  principal  vessels  were  retaken,  together  with  all 
the  cannon.  They  had  just  time  to  set  fire  to  the  other  bateaux, 
and  retreated  over  the  mountains."  ^^ 

The  statem-ent  of  Burgoyne  was  probably  based  in  part  on  the 
report  of  Lieutenant  Irwine  who  was  in  com-mand  at  Ft.  George 
with  30  men  and  whose  report  found  in  the  Gates  Papers  was  as 
follows  (the  date  is  apparently  a  mistake  for  25th) : 


50  PETER  NELSON 

"Fort  George  24^^  ggp^.r  1777. 
"Sir 

"I  think  it  necessary  to  acquaint  you  for  the  information  of 
General  BurgO}Tie,  that  the  enemy,  to  the  amount  of  two  or  three 
hundred  men  came  fiom  Skenesborough  to  the  carrying  place  neai 
Tyconderoea  and  there  took  seventeen  or  eighteen  Batteaus 
with  Gunboats — Their  design  was  first  to  attack  the  fort  but 
considering  they  could  not  well  accomplish  it  without  cannon  they 
desisted  from  that  scheme,  they  were  then  resolved  to  attack 
Diamond  Island  (which  Island  Capt.  Aubrey  commands)  and  if 
they  succeeded,  to  take  this  place,  they  began  to  attack  the  Island 
with  cannon  about  9  o'clock  yesterday  morning,  I  have  the  satis- 
faction to  inform  you  that  after  a  cannonading  for  near  an  hour 
and  a  half  on  both  sides  the  enemy  took  to  their  retreat.  Then 
was  Gun  boats  sent  in  pursuit  of  them  which  occasioned  the  enemy 
to  burn  their  Gun  boats  and  Batteaus  and  made  their  escape 
towards  Skenesborough  in  great  confusion — we  took  one  Gun 
boat  from  them  with  a  twelve  pounder  in  her  and  a  good  quantity 
of  ammunition — w^e  have  heard  there  was  a  few  kill'd  and  many 
wounded  of  them.  There  was  not  a  man  killed  or  hurt  during  the 
whole  action  of  his  Majesty's  Troops.  I  have  the  honor  to  be 
Sir  your  most  obedient  and  most  humb'^  Ser*^ 

Geo'  Irwine  Com  at  Fort  George  L*  47'''."3i 

It  appears  strange  that  no  account  of  this  fight  at  Diamond 
Island  was  published  by  the  Americans  and  that,  except  for  the 
British  account,  which  does  not  mention  Colonel  Brown,  it  re- 
mained practically  unknown  till  the  publication  of  an  article  by 
Rev.  B.  F.  De  Costa  in  1S72,  an  article  which  has  not  been  used  in 
our  general  histories  of  the  Revolution. 

Other  letters  of  Colonel  Brown  in  the  possession  of  a  descendant, 
Capt.  William  Butler  Clarke,  of  Belmont,  Massachusetts  (some  of 
which  were  evidently  used  by  Mr.  Howe  in  his  sketch  of  Brown 
already  referred  to),  were  printed  last  year  in  the  New  England 
Historical  and  Genealogical  Register,  but  without  any  comments 
other  than  a  very  brief  introduction  stating  the  source  of  the 
papers.  This  article  has  probably  not  come  to  the  attention  of 
many  students  of  New  York  history,  but  it  has  funiished  the 
occasion  of  this  effort  properly  to  understand  the  events  narrated. 

The  managem.ent  of  the  expedition  by  Colonel  Brown  was 
commended  in  General  Lincoln's  letter  to  him  dated  at  Bemis 
Heights,  September  28th,  in  which  he  regrets  that  it  could  not  have 
been    crowned  with    greater    success.     On     Septem.ber    30th    he 


THE  BATTLE  OF  DIAMOND  ISLAND  51 

despatched  Colonel  Brown  to  Pawlet,  directing  him  on  his 
arrival  there  to  send  two  or  three  hundred  men  with  10  or  12  days 
provision  between  Ft.  Edward  and  Ft.  George  in  order  to  cut  oflE 
all  communication  between  the  posts.  Of  the  results  we  know 
nothing;  but  the  surrender  of  Burgoyne  at  Saratoga  soon  after 
brought  about  the  early  retreat  of  the  British  from  Ft.  George  and 
Diamond  Island  and  a  little  later  from  Ft.  Ticonderoga.  With 
the  later  events  on  Lake  George  there  is  not  time  to  deal.  What 
the  results  of  the  capture  of  this  little  island  might  have  been  is 
difficult  to  judge.  Burgoyne's  surrender  came  so  soon  that  its 
result  would  perhaps  have  been  slight  in  any  case.  But  though  a 
failure  in  its  immediate  purpose,  this  study  has  shown,  I  hope, 
that  it  was  part  of  a  well-conceived  scheme  of  operation,  carried 
out  with  energy  and  judgment  and  by  a  commander  whose  work 
has  not  hitherto  received  its  due  credit. 

Peter   Nelson 


Authorities  Cited 


iThe  elevations  above  sea-level  are:  Lake  Champlain,  101  feet;  Lake 
George,  322  feet;  Hudson  River  at  Ft.  Edward,  about  120  feet;  highest 
point  between  Ft.  Anne  and  Ft.  Edward,  about  150  feet;  highest  point  be- 
tween Lake  George  and  Ft.  Edward,  about  570  feet. 

^General  Dieskau  had  approached  Ft.  William  Henry  by  way  of  South 
Bay  and  the  southern  end  of  French  Mountain. 

^Documents  relating  to  the  Colonial  History  of  the  State  of  New  York,  8:451. 
This  work  will  hereafter  be  cited  as  Col.  Doc. 

^Skene  settled  a  few  families  at  Skenesborough  in  1761.  Thomas  Jones, 
History  of  New  York  during  the  Revolutionary  War,  (New  York,  1879),  1:693. 

^B.  F.  DeCosta,  A  Narrative  of  Events  at  Lake  George  (N.  Y.,  1868),  p.  44- 
46,  73.  This  work  will  be  cited  hereafter  as  DeCosta,  Narrative;  it  is  prac- 
tically identical  as  to  text  with  chapters  6-8  and  appendices  I  and  II  of  his 
Lake  George  (N.  Y.,  1868) ;  his  Lake  George  (N.  Y.,  1869)  omits  the  appendices. 
B.  F.  DeCosta,  Notes  on  the  History  of  Fort  George  (N.  Y.,  1871),  is  an  inde- 
pendent work  and  will  be  cited  as  DeCosta,  Fort  George.  See  also  Cat.  Doc, 
8:371,  and  Documentary  History  of  the  State  of  New  York,  4:517  (quarto  edition). 

^DeCosta,  Narrative,  p.  54. 

'DeCosta,  Narrative,  p.  47-62. 

*Col.  Pierse  Long,  of  New  Hampshire. 

'It  has  been  said  that  he  retreated  to  Rutland  but  this  is  an  error  which 
probably  arose  from  his  order  to  Warner  to  retire  to  that  point  if  hard  pressed. 
See  letter  of  St.  Clair  to  Schu\ier,  Dorset,  8  July  1777,  in  Jared  Sparks,  Corre- 
spondence of  the  American  Revolution  (Boston,  1853),  2:513. 

lojohn  Burgoyne,  A  State  of  the  Expedition  (Ed.  2,  London,  1780),  p.  iv. 

"Burgoyne,  p.  viii-ix. 

i^Burgoyne,  p.  xxxv-xxxvi. 

"Burgoyne,  p.  17-19. 

"Gen.  John  Watts  DePeyster  is  quoted  in  Justin  Winsor,  Narrative  and 
Critical  History  of  America   (Boston,   1889),  6:313,  as  follows:  "Burgoyne 


52  PETER  NELSON 

could  have  been  re-assembled  at  'Old  Ty'  by  the  10th  July;  could  have  been 
transported  to  Fort  George  by  the  l2th;  and,  having  left  his  heavy  guns  and 
all  but  his  light  artillery  and  indispensable  materials  there  or  at  Ty,  in  depot, 
■with  a  sufficient  guard,  could  have  reached  Fort  Edward  on  the  evening  of  the 
13th  July.  From  this  point  to  Albany  is  about  fifty  miles.  With  six  or  ten 
days'  rations  and  an  extra  supply  of  ammunition  sufficient  for  a  battle  of  that 
period,  Burgoyne  could  have  swept  Schuyler  out  of  his  path  with  ease,  and, 
allowing  one  day's  delay  for  a  fight,    could  have  occupied  Albany  on  the  16th 

July." 

I'Burgoyne,  p.  Ixxxiv. 

i^Sparks,  2:533-36.  The  date  of  Gates'  letter  is  incorrectly  given  as  Sep- 
tember. The  plan  had  previously  been  discussed  by  ;Schuyler  and  Lincoln; 
see  letter  of  former,  31  July  1777,  in  Sparks,  2:516. 

'"Lincoln  to  the  Council  of  Massachusetts,  23  Sept.  1777,  in  Sparks,  2: 
528-30. 

'^Lincoln's  orders  to  Brown  are  printed  in  Sparks,  2:525-26,  and  are  there 
dated  the  I2th;  in  his  letter  to  Gates,  14  Sept.  1777,  De  Costa,  Fort  George, 
p.  42,  Lincoln  gives  the  date  as  yesterday  (that  is,  the  ijth);  and  in  his  letter 
to  the  Council  of  Massachusetts  he  wrote  that  his  orders  had  been  issued  on 
the  14th.  In  spite  of  these  discrepancies,  there  seems  very  little  reason  to 
doubt  Brown's  statement  in  his  letter  of  4  Oct.  1777  that  he  received  his 
orders  on  the  ijth ;  his  report  from  Poultney  on  the  same  day  shows  that  he  set 
out  at  once. 

"Col.  Thomas  Johnson,  of  the  Vermont  militia. 

^^Col.  Benjamin  Ruggles  Woodbridge,  of  the  Massachusetts  militia. 

-'The  19th,  according  to  letter  of  Lincoln  to  Laurens,  Sparks,  2:535;  but 
the  i8th,  according  to  his  letter  to  the  Council  of  Massachusetts,  Sparks,  2; 
529. 

"Archibald  M.  Howe,  Colonel  John  Brown  oj  Pittsfield,  Massachusetts,  the 
brave  accuser  of  Benedict  A  mold,  an  address  delivered  before  the  Fort  Rensse- 
laer chapter  of  the  D.  A.  R.  and  others,  at  the  village  of  Palatine  Bridge, 
New  York,  September  29,  1908  (Boston,  1908). 

"^This  letter  and  others  which  follow  are  quoted  from  a  communication  by 
Capt.  William  Butler  Clarke,  of  Belmont,  Mass.,  to  the  New  England  Historical 
and  Genealogical  Register,  October  1920,  74:284-93.  The  letters  there  printed 
are: 

1  Brown  to  Lincoln,  Poultney,  13  Sept.  1777 

2  u  u  ..         j4       ..       .. 

3  "       Johnson,  Lake  George  Landing,  18  Sept.  1777 

4  "       Lincoln,         "  "  "         "     "         " 

5  "  "      19    ;' 

6  "       Warner,         "  "  "         "     "         " 

7  "       Lincoln,         "  "  "       20     "         " 

8  Lincoln  to  Brown,  Pawlet,  21    Sept.  1777 

9  Brown  to  Lincoln,  Skenesborough,  26  Sept.  1777 

10  Lincoln  to  Brown,  Bemis  Heights,  28    "  " 

11  "  "  "  "     30       " 

12  Brown  to  Lincoln,  Falls  Mills,  1  Oct.  1777 

13  Lincoln  to  Brown,  (no  place),  2    "       " 

14  Brown  to ,  Pawlet,  4       "       " 

Of  these  nos.  4  and  9  had  previously  appeared  in  B.  F.  DeCosta,  The  Fight 
at  Diamond  Island  (N.  Y.,  1872),  reprinted  with  additions  from  the  New 
England  Historical  and  Genealogical  Register,  April  1872,  26:147-52;  the 
date  of  No.  4,  is  there  erroneously  given  as  the  10th.  Both  were  copied  from 
the  Gates  Papers  in  the  New  York  Hi.storical  Society.  DeCosta's  article  was 
reprinted,  practically  in  full,  except  the  introductory  pages,  in  William  L. 
Stone,  The  Campaign  of  Lieut.  Gen.  Burgoyne  (1877),  p.  347-52.  No.  4  was 
also  printed  in  Sparks,  2:529-30,  presumably  from  "the  newspapers  of  the 


THE  BATTLE  OF  DIAMOND  ISLAND  53 

time"  and  said  to  be  addressed  to  Gates,  and  No.  8  appears  in  Sparks,  2:527- 
28,  from  a  different  original.  From  Howe's  address  on  Colonel  Brown,  it 
would  seem  that  he  had  also  seen  Nos.  5,  7,  and  14. 

^^From  the  absence  of  any  later  reference  to  such  an  island,  this  statement 
seems  to  be  distorted  information  about  Diamond  Island,  as  is  the  later  refer- 
ence to  three  companies  of  German  troops  at  the  island. 

''^In  his  letter  of  13  September,  Colonel  Brown  mentions  "Col,  Warner's 
party"  and  next  day  again  speaks  of  "Colo.  Warner's  Detachmt."  This  was 
doubtless  Col.  Seth  Warner  of  Vermont.  The  General  Warner  to  whom  his 
letter  of  the  19th  was  addressed,  and  who  is  mentioned  in  his  letter  to  Lincoln 
of  the  19th  and  20th,  and  in  Lincoln's  letter  to  Brown  of  the  2lst,  30th  and 
2d  October,  was  Jonathan  Warner,  of  Hard  wick,  Mass.,  who  was  brigadier 
general  of  Massachusetts  militia.  He  was  appointed  to  the  command  of  all 
Massachusetts  militia  detached  for  the  reinforcement  of  the  Northern  army, 
9  Aug.  1777  (L.  R.  Paige,  History  of  Hardwick  (Boston,  1883),  p.  273). 

In  the  same  letter  Lincoln  says  that  General  Bayley,  who  is  referred  to  in 
Lincoln's  letter  to  Brown  of  the  21st,  "is  left  at  Castleton,  in  the  neighborhood 
of  the  enemy,  and  will  forward  supplies,  and  join  the  troops,  if  necessary." 
This  was  Gen.  Jacob  Bayley  who  was  commissioned  brigadier-general  of 
Gloucester  and  Cumberland  county  militia  by  the  New  York  Provincial 
Congress  in  1776.  A  letter  of  his  dated  at  Castleton,  22  Sept.  1777,  is  printed 
in  the  New  Hampshire  State  Papers,  17:136,  in  which  he  reports  500  prisoners 
taken  and  the  division  reduced  to  1,500  by  General  Lincoln's  withdrawal  of 
most  of  the  troops  to  the  south. 

26See  letters  referred  to  in  note  23. 

^'Dunham  Bay. 

*8Howe,  p.  12,  assumes  that  this  report  was  to  Lincoln,  but  Captain  Clarke 
says:  "There  is  nothing  in  or  on  this  letter  to  indicate  to  what  general  it  was 
written.     Apparently  it  was  not  written  to  General  Lincoln." 

29Max  von  Eelking,  Memoirs,  and  Letters  and  Journals,  of  Major  General 
Riedesel  (Albany  1868),  1:134. 

'"Burgoyne,  p.  xcv;  quoted  by  DeCosta,  Diamond  Island,  p.  8,  with  date 
of  27th;  also  in  his  Fort  George,  p.  43,  and  his  Narrative,  p.  66. 

^^DeCosta,  Diamond  Island,  p.  9;  from  Gates  Papers. 


REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS 

A  History  oj  Minnesota.  By  William  Watts  Folwell.  In 
four  volumes.  Vol.  I.  (Saint  Paul:  Minnesota  Historical  Soci- 
ety.    1921.     Pp.  xvii,  533.     Illustrations  and  Maps.) 

This  promises  to  be  a  monumental  history  of  Minnesota.  It 
is  of  peculiar  interest  to  New  Yorkers  because  of  the  fact  that 
te  a  uthor  was  bom  on  a  farm  in  the  town  of  Romulus,  was 
gad  uated  from  Hobart  College  at  Geneva,  and  was  for  many 
years  a  professor  there.  In  1869  he  was  made  president  of  the 
University  of  Minnesota  and  continued  as  such  until  1884. 

Fur  traders  from  New  York  and  fur  trading  companies  organ- 
ized in  New  York  played  an  important  part  in  the  early  explora- 
tions and  development  of  Minnesota.  Such  a  trader  was  John 
Jacob  Astor  and  such  a  company  was  the  American  Fur  Company, 
which  he  organized.     The  story  of  these  is  told  in  the  first  volume. 

New  York's  additional  interest  is  drawn  from  the  fact  that  when 
the  territory  was  peopled  it  was  from  New  York  State  that  the 
larger  number  of  the  settlers  came  during  the  years  1855  and  1856. 
Just  as  New  Yorkers  had  been  most  active  in  settling  Wisconsin 
between  1830  and  1850,  so  now  they  showed  a  similar  activity  in 
Minnesota. 

The  reason  for  this  migration  from  New  York  State  has  never 
been  fully  explained  and  Mr.  Folwell  does  not  even  broach  it  in 
this  volume.  Joseph  Schafer  of  Wisconsin  has  recently  ventured 
the  supposition  that  it  was  due  to  the  tendency  early  observable 
in  Western  New  York,  for  large  owners  to  buy  out  small  farmers 
for  the  purpose  of  cattle  raising,  and  dairying.  Probably  there 
was  just  as  much  in  the  temptation  to  sell  acreage  at  high  prices 
in  New  York  when  they  could  go  out  to  Wisconsin  and  Minnesota 
and  buy  lands  at  figures  as  low  as  $1.25  an  acre. 

In  a  brief  notice  such  as  this  it  is  impossible  to  select  for  mention 
the  many  items  of  interest  to  the  New  Yorker  in  this  volume. 
The  book  is  written  in  a  delightfully  entertaining  style. 


REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS  55 

Letters   of  Members  of  the   Cotitinental   Congress.     Edited   by 

Edmund  C.  Burnett.  Vol.  I.     August  29,  1774  to  July  4,  1776. 

(Washington    D.    C.  Carnegie     Institution.     1921.     Pp.     Ixvi, 
572.) 

The  interest  of  New  Yorkers  in  this  collection  is  more  particular- 
ly directed  to  its  own  members  who  are  listed  on  pages  Hi — Ivii. 
They  were  John  Alsop,  Simon  Boerum,  George  Clinton,  James 
Duane,  William  Flo>d,  John  Haring,  John  Jay,  Francis  Lewis, 
Philip  Livingston,  Robert  R.  Livingston,  Isaac  Low,  Lewis 
Morris,  Philip  Schuyler,  Henry  Wisner.  A  study  of  the  index  of 
which  there  is  a  very  good  one  shows  that  James  Duane,  John 
Jay  and  Philip  Schuyler  were  the  most  active  if  we  were  to  judge 
by  the  number  of  references  which  are  made  to  them. 

These  letters  will  supply  in  a  measure,  the  accounts  of  pro- 
ceedings which  were  never  kept  or  if  kept  for  the  time  being, 
were  destroyed.  Just  as  John  Jay  is  said  to  have  remarked  to 
young  William  Livingston  that  the  true  history  of  the  Revolution 
would  never  be  written,  so  Dr.  Jameson  calls  attention  to  the 
statements  of  John  Adams  that  so  many  of  the  meetings  were  in 
secret  and  so  much  of  the  material  purposely  destroyed,  that  the 
history  could  not  be  written. 

As  a  piece  of  good  editing  this  work  of  Mr.  Burnett's  leaves 
nothing  to  be  desired.  Not  only  are  letters  given,  but  also 
extracts  from  diaries  where  they  have  been  found.  The  collection 
is  thoroughly  annotated  at  the  bottom  of  each  page  so  that  every 
letter  or  docimient  used  is  placed  in  its  proper  setting — a  very 
necessary  thing  in  a  collection  drawn  from  so  many  different 
sources.  Force's  American  Archives,  the  Journals  of  the  Con- 
tinental Congress,  and  the  Journals  of  Provincial  Congresses  are 
most  drawn  from.  In  addition,  numerous  collections  of  private 
letters,  some  of  which  have  not  as  yet  been  printed,  have  been 
used. 

The  work  will  be  complete  in  six  volumes. 

The  History  of  the  306th  Field  Artillery.  Compiled  by  the  men 
who  participated  in  the  events  described.  (New  York:  Knicker- 
bocker   Press.     1920.     Pp.    vi,    169.    Illustrations    and    maps.) 

In  a  measure  this  volume  tells  the  same  story  for  the  whole 
306th  Field  Artillery  as  the  volume  below  tells  for  Battery    B 


56  REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS 

alone.     The  history  of  "Soldier  making  at  Camp  Upton"  and  of 
other  events  is  told  in  chapters  similar  in  title  and  content. 

This  work,  however,  takes  on  a  more  serious  aspect  in  Part  II, 
which  is  devoted  to  "Operations  and  Statistics,"  but  even  in 
this  portion  there  are  several  chapters  under  such  titles  as  "Regi- 
m.ental  Fun  and  Frolic,"  "The  Howitzer"  a  short  lived  journal- 
istic enterprise,  "Prisoners  in  Germany,"  "Paris,"  and  "Tales 
They  Tell."  Try  as  he  will  the  American  soldier  cannot  get 
away  from  the  comic  side  of  even  serious  life.  It  is  a  tribute  to 
his  mental  make  up  that  he  was  able  to  go  rollicking  through  war 
as  he  goes  through  peace.  It  seems  at  times  as  if  he  got  more 
fun  out  of  war  than  he  gets  out  of  the  business  of  life. 

One  of  the  m.ost  valuable  parts  of  the  volume  is  the  portion 
which  is  devoted  to  the  "Military  Biographies  of  every  Man  in 
the  306th  Field  Artillery." 

The  drawings  and  illustrations  are  a  credit  to  the  authors. 

J.  S. 

The  Story  of  Battery  B,  jo6th  F.  A. — 7/th  Division.  By  Edi- 
torial Staff.  (Printed  by  the  Premier  Printing  Company, 
New  York.     No  date.     Pp.   102.     Illustrations.) 

In  ten  chapters  entitled  Cam.p  Upton,  the  Leviathan  and 
Brest,  Training  Days  at  Camp  De  Souge,  The  Vosges  Front, 
Vesle-Aisne  Campaign,  The  Eight  Day  Hike  to  the  Argonne, 
The  Argonne-Meuse  Campaign,  Marcq  and  the  Armistice,  "Home 
was  Never  Like  This" — Dancevoir  and  Noyen,  and  Homeward 
Bound,  the  story  of  the  306th  is  told.  It  is  accompanied  by 
numerous  photographic  illustrations  and  snap-shots,  an  honor 
roll,  casualti  humorous  stories,  poems  and  an  alphabetical 
roster  with  addi  esses. 

It  is  in  no  sense  a  technical  or  military  account  of  the  activities 
of  the  unit.  It  is  told  in  a  popular  vein  calculated  to  appeal  to 
the  lelatives  and  fi  lends  of  the  members  and  to  serve  as  a  sort  of 
reviver  of  memories  foi  the  boys  themselves.  It  is  books  of  this 
kind,  however,  which  do  more  to  show  the  psychology  of  o  ur  men 
in  the  World  War  than  any  technical  treatise  could  possibly  do. 

"Home  Was  Never  Like  This,"  is  a  delightful  chapter  showing 
the  impressions  which  the  French  male  and  female  made  on  our 
men.  The  question  of  getting  a  bath  was  always  a  problem,  but 
even  this  hardship  the  men  seemed  to  take  good  naturedly. 

J.  S. 


REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS  57 

Monroe  in  the  World  War.  By  Arthur  Coventry  Patmore. 
(Monroe.  New  York.  Monroe  Gazette.  1921.  Pp.  65.  Illus- 
trations). 

The  little  booklet  gives  a  sketch  of  the  activities  of  the  in- 
corporated village  of  Monroe  during  the  World  War.  It  con- 
tains a  list  of  men  who  entered  the  service,  the  contributions  to 
the  Red  Cross,  Liberty  Loans  and  Y.  M.  C.  A.,  a  diary  of  Private 
John  Dawson,  letters  from  some  soldiers,  the  participation  of  the 
high  school  and  other  items.  It  is  to  be  regretted  that  more 
details  were  not  obtained  from  the  men  who  entered  the  service 
such  as  the  units  to  which  they  belonged,  and  other  items  usually 
obtained  by  questionnaires. 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

PERSONAL 

Roswell  Randall  Hoes,  the  noted  authority  on  Ulster  County 
and  Kingston  history,  died  in  Washington,  D.  C,  on  October  26, 
1921. 

Dr.  J.  A.  Campbell  of  Toronto  and  Colonel  Roland  B.  Camp- 
bell of  Great  Britain  who  are  descended  from  the  famous  Duncan 
Campbell,  who  lost  his  hfe  at  Ticonderoga  under  Abercromby, 
visited  Duncan's  grave  in  Union  Cemetery  at  Fort  Edward  on 
November  24,  1921. 

On  September  15,  1921,  James  A.  Beckett,  Delmer  Runkle 
and  William  C.  Jones,  accompanied  by  James  Sullivan,  State 
Historian,  and  A.  W.  Abrams,  Chief  of  the  Visual  Instruction 
Division  of  the  State  Education  Department  visited  Bennington 
Battlefield  Park,  in  order  to  make  a  survey  of  what  was  needed 
to  put  the  park  in  shape  for  visitors  so  that  the  Legislature  at  itg 
coming  session  could  be  asked  to  appropriate  the  necessary  funds 
Mr.  Abrams  took  photographs. 

Mrs.  Theodore  Douglas  Robinson,  sister  of  Theodore  Roose- 
velt, unveiled  a  bust  of  her  brother  at  the  Roosevelt  School,  at 
New  Rochelle,  December  19,  1921. 

It  is  proposed  that  the  seven  English  speaking  nations  of  the 
world,  Great  Britain  and  Ireland,  Canada,  Newfoundland, 
Australia,  New  Zealand,  South  Africa  and  the  United  States  join 
in  a  celebration  of  Magna  Charta  Day — which  comes  on  June 
15th. 

HISTORICAL    SOCIETIES    AND    CLUBS 

The  Chautauqua  County  Historical  Society  held  its  thirty- 
eighth  annual  meeting  at  Ma^-ville,  September  10,  1921.  The 
meeting  was  mainly  devoted  to  obituary  notes  on  Charles  M .  Dow 
of  Jamestown,  Gilbert  W.  Strong  of  Sherman  and  Herman  Sixbey 
of  Mayville.     The  former  officers  were  re-eleeted. 

58 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  59 

At  the  September  21,  1921  meeting  of  the  Madison  County  His- 
torical Society  in  its  room  in  the  city  hall  at  Oneida,  Prof.  Harry  W. 
Langworthy  gave  an  address  on  "Points  of  Historical  Interest 
Along  the  Hudson  River." 

The  Daughters  of  Columbia  County  Historical  Society,  at  its 
meeting  in  Albany  on  October  30,  1921,  approved  of  the  erection 
of  a  "House  of  History,"  in  memor}^  of  Theodore  Roosevelt. 
Sketches  of  his  life  were  read.  Mrs.  James  Gillette  read  a  paper 
on  "The  Livingston  Family." 

On  September  13,  1921,  the  Daughters  of  Columbia  County 
Historical  Society,  held  a  meeting  at  Lebanon  Springs.  Dr. 
Hattie  Peckham  solicited  facts  of  the  unwritten  history  of 
Lebanon  Springs. 

On  September  21,  1921,  the  Dutchess  County  Historical 
Society  made  a  historical  pilgrimage  to  the  towns  of  Washington, 
Amenia  and  Northeast.  Many  historic  spots  were  visited  and 
several  lecturers  explained  their  significance. 

The  Daughters  of  Columbia  County  Historical  Society  met  at 
Hudson  on  September  29,  1921.  Dr.  George  Rossman  of  An- 
cram,  spoke  on  "Indian  Remains  in  Columbia  County,"  and  Dr. 
James  Sullivan,  the  State  Historian  spoke  on  "New  York  Men 
on  the  Battlefields  of  France." 

At  the  September  27,  1921,  meeting  of  the  American  University 
Club  at  Sidney  in  Delaware  County,  Mrs.  E.  Clark  read  a  paper 
on  the  "Early  History^  of  Delaware  County,"  Mrs.  Doty  read  one 
on  the  "Historic  Places  of  Delaware  County"  and  Miss  Miller 
one  on  "Noted  Men  and  Women  of  Delaw^are  County." 

The  Lockport  Historical  Society  was  organized  in  October, 
1921.  Cuthbert  W.  Pound,  judge  of  the  State  Court  of  Appeals 
was  chosen  president;  Hiram  D.  McNeil,  vice-president;  Austin 
C.  Dwyer,  secretary-;  C.  A.  Ward,  treasurer;  George  S.  Gooding, 
corresponding  secretary. 

At  the  regular  meeting  of  the  Rochester  Historical  Society  on 
October  1,  1921,  president  Remington  resigned  and  Charles 
H.  Wiltsie  was  elected  to  take  his  place.  An  address  was  de- 
livered by  Dr.  A.  H.  Strong,  on  the  "Life  and  Services  of  Pro- 
fessor Henry  A.  Ward." 

The  State  Convention  of  the  D.  A.  R.  met  in  Rochester, 
October  19,   1921. 


60  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

The  Verona  Historical  Society  met  at  Bameveld  on  October  4, 
1921,  and  elected  W.  A.  Devott,  president;  Miss  Jennie  H. 
Mcintosh,  secretary;  and  Frank  L.  Worden,  treasurer.  George 
F.  Wallace  of  Herkimer  read  a  paper  on  "The  Conspiracy  of 
Aaron  Burr." 

The  Arcadia  Historical  Society  of  Newark  held  its  annual 
meeting  on  November  5,  1921.  Miss  Minnie  F.  Snyder  read  a 
most  entertaining  accoimt  of  the  meeting  of  the  New  York  State 
Historical  Association  at  Lake  George. 

Poultney  Bigelow  has  sent  a  vigorous  letter  to  the  Kingston 
Freeman,  urging  the  formation  of  a  county  historical  society  for 
Ulster. 

During  the  summer,  Mr.  Milton  Thomas  of  Chatham,  addressed 
the  Daughters  of  Columbia  County  Historical  Society  on  the 
subject  of  "Historical  Research." 

On  December  10,  1921,  Joseph  B.  Gilder  addressed  the  Century 
Association  of  New  York  City  on  "Captain  Kidd:  The  Man  and 
The  Myth." 

PUBLICATIONS,    BOOKS,    ARTICLES,    MANUSCRIPTS 

The  Year  Book  of  the  Dutchess  County  Historical  Society  for 
1921,  contains  an  account  of  the  Dutchess  County  Historical 
Society  Third  Historical  Pilgrimage,  and  the  historical  papers 
read  in  connection  with  two  places,  Dover  and  Quaker  Hill. 
In  addition  there  is  published  a  considerable  quantity  of  letters  of 
the  Livingston  family  under  the  title  of  A  Packet  of  Old  Letters, 
1739-1753. 

The  American  Hebrew  for  September  30,  1921,  has  an  article 
entitled  In  Early  New  York,  The  American  Background  of  the 
Jew  at  the  Beginning  of  American  History  by  Samuel  Oppenheim. 
Another  article  by  Elias  Lieberman  is  entitled  The  First  American 
Jewish  Citizen,  and  is  also  about   New  Amsterdam. 

In  State  Service,  for  August-September,  1921,  are  articles  on 
Walt  Whitman's  Birthplace  and  Boyhood  Haunts;  How  Napoleon 
III  was  Locked  in  Sing  Sing  Prison;  and  New  York  State's 
University  and  what  It  Means. 

The  Bulletin  of  the  New  York  Public  Library  for  August,  1921, 
has  a  continuation  of  A  History  of  the  New  York  Public  Library. 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  61 

From  New  York  to  Iowa,  is  the  title  of  an  article  by  Lydia 
Arnold  Titus  in  the  October,  1921,  number  of  The  Palimpsest. 
It  tells  the  story  of  life  in  the  40's  in  Machias  Comers  thirty 
miles  from  Buffalo  and  of  a  migration  to  the  west. 

Where  Philip  Embury  Lived,  Labored  and  Died  (in  Washing- 
ton County,  N.  Y.)  is  the  title  of  an  article  by  Charles  A.  Ingraham 
in  the  September  29,  1921,  issue  of  the  Christian  Advocate. 

The  New  York  Historical  Society  Quarterly  Bulletin,  for  October, 
1921,  has  an  excellent  frontispiece  of  the  City  Hall,  New  York, 
1826,  and  an  article  on  Pieter  Vanderlyn,  Portrait  Painter,  whose 
work  was  done  in  New  York  from  1719-1732.  There  is  an  illus- 
tration of  the  keg  used  by  Dewitt  Clinton,  at  the  opening  of  the 
Erie  Canal  in  1825,  and  another  of  a  Hessian  regimental  breast- 
plate which   is  accompanied  by  a  descriptive  article. 

Scribner's  Magazine  has  been  running  articles  by  Corinne  R. 
Robinson  on  My  Brother  Theodore  Roosevelt.  In  the  World's 
Work  for  April,  1921,  is  an  article  by  R.  H.  Post  entitled.  How 
Theodore  Roosevelt  Made  the  Government  Efficient. 

In  the  April  1921,  number  of  the  Journal  of  Negro  History  is  an 
article  by  A.  G.  Lindsay  on  The  Economic  Condition  of  the  Negroes 
of  New  York  prior  to   i86i. 

The  Mohawk  Trail,  its  History  and  Course,  is  the  title  of  a  book 
by  William  B.  Browne  of  North  Adams,  Mass.  who  also  has  it 
on  sale. 

In  the  Bulletin  of  the  New  York  Public  Library,  for  September, 
1921,  is  to  be  found  the  concluding  installment  of  A  History  of  the 
New  York  Public  Library. 

In  the  September,  1921,  issue  of  the  Daughters  of  the  American 
Revolution  Magazine,  is  an  article  by  T.  T.  Belote  on  War  Medals 
of  the  American  Revolution,  many  of  which  were  given  for  victories 
won  on  New  York  soil.  In  the  same  number  is  an  interesting 
report  from  the  Mahwenawasigh  Chapter  (Poughkeepsie)  of  the 
D.  A.R.,  on  the  tablets  erected  on  the  George  Clinton  house  and 
on  the  site  of  the  former  cotu-t  house  where  the  Federal  Consti- 
tution was  ratified.  Similar  interesting  reports  are  to  be  found 
of  the  Onwentsia  Chapter  (Addison,  N.  Y.),  Au-ly-ou-let  Chapter 
(Franklin,  N.  Y.),  and  of  the  Tuscarora  Chapter  of  Binghampton. 

The  Daughters  of  the  Am&i-ican  Revolution  Magazine  for  October, 
1921,  contains  the  first  installment  of  an  article  by  T.  T.  Belote 


62  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

on  Military  and  Naval  Medals  of  the  War  of  1812-ij  and  another  by- 
Amelia  Day  Campbell  entitled  The  Last  Washington  Inaugural 
Flag.  Accompanying  the  latter  is  an  illustration  of  the  flag  of 
the  Second  Regiment,  First  Brigade,  New  York  State  artillery, 
which  was  carried  at  the  first  inauguration  of  Washington.  There 
is  also  a  report  of  the  activities  of  the  Chief  Taughannock  Chapter 
(Trumansburg,  N.  Y.) 

The  Huntington  Historical  Society,  IQ21-IQ22,  is  the  title  of  a 
handbook  giving  a  list  of  members  and  activities  of  this  very 
active  society. 

The  life  of  Daniel  H.  Burnham,  Architect  and  Planner  of  Cities 
by  Charles  Moore  which  has  just  appeared  recalls  the  fact  that 
Burnham  was  bom  in  Henderson,  New  York. 

The  General  John  E.  Wool  Chapter  of  the  National  Society 
United  States  Daughters  of  1812,  has  in  its  possession  a  map  of 
Old  Fort  Putnam  drawn  in   1808. 

In  the  Rhinebeck  Gazette  for  July  9,  1921,  Mrs.  Theodore  de 
Laporte  has  an  article  on  the  History  of  the  RJtinebeck  Baptist 
Church. 

In  the  Political  Science  Quarterly  for  December,  1921,  Dixon  R. 
Fox  has  an  article  on  State  History.  The  same  author  has  pub- 
lished separately  through  the  Department  of  History  of  Columbia 
University  a  pamphlet  entitled:  The  Historical  Essay  and  The 
Critical  Review. 

The  Louisiana  Historical  Quarterly  for  October,  1920,  has  an 
article  on  Edward  Livingston,  who  codified  the  conflicting  laws  of 
Louisiana,  and  a  letter  entitled;  A  New  York  Yankee  in  New 
Orleans. 

The  Indiana  Magazine  of  History  contains  an  article  on  New 
Albany  and  the  Scribner  Family,  a  settlement  made  in  that  State 
by  a  family  coming  from  Connecticut  and  New  York. 

In  the  December,  1921,  number  of  the  Indiana  Magazine  of 
History  is  a  very  interesting  contribution  entitled  A  Journal  of 
Travel  from  New  York  to  Vincennes  and  Return  in  1827  by  Samuel 
Bernard  Judah.  The  first  five  pages  are  occupied  with  the 
journey  from  New  York  City  to  Albany  and  then  through  New 
York  State  to  the  Pennsylvania  line. 

The  General  Society  of  Colonial  Wars,  has  in  preparation  an 
Index  of  Ancestors. 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  63 

In  The  New  York  Genealogical  and  Biographical  Record,  for 
October,  appear  articles  on  the  Wright,  Templeton.  Joslin  families 
by  Edith  Becker.  The  Westchester  County,  N.  Y.,  Miscellanea 
and  the  Tompkins  County  Gravestone  Inscriptions  are  continued 
from  earlier  numbers. 

In  The  Palimpsest,  for  September,  1921,  is  an  article  by  Ruth  A. 
Gallaher  on  The  Cardiff  Giant,  that  famous  hoax  which  originated 
on  a  New  York  farm. 

New  York  State  has  published  a  report  entitled:  New  York, 
New  Jersey  port  and  harbor  development  commission. 

The  World's  Work  for  August  and  September  1921,  has  selec- 
tions from  Henry  Morgenthau's  autobiography  one  of  which  is 
entitled  What  I  learned  from  Sulzer  and  Tammany. 

Local  Government  in  the  United  States,  is  the  title  of  a  book 
written  by  Herman  G.  James  and  published  by  Appleton. 

In  the  Forum  for  September  1921,  Hiram  W.  Johnson  has  an 
article  on  New  York  City's  Problem. 

American  Police  Systems,  by  Raymond  B.  Fosdick  and  Ameri- 
can Police  Administration,  by  Elmer  D.  Graper  both  devote  con- 
■siderable  attention  to  New  York. 

Herman  Hagedom,  jr.,  has  written  a  pamphlet  entitled:  Theo- 
dore Roosevelt,  A  Biographical  Sketch  and  Excerpts  from  his 
Writings  and  Addresses  for  the  use  of  those  who  would  in  their  own 
addresses  or  writings  spread  true  Americanism.  Address  Roose- 
velt Mem^orial  Association,  1  Madison  Avenue,  New  York  City, 
for  copies. 

In  the  State  Service  magazine  for  October — November,  1921, 
is  an  article  by  Joseph  Beal  entitled  Uncle  Sam  May  Soon  Acquire 
Saratoga  Battlefield.  A  history  of  the  battle  is  given  with  numer- 
ous illustrations. 

In  the  September  1921,  of  the  Grosvenor  Library  Bulletin, 
Buffalo,  is  a  historical  sketch  accompanied  by  illustrations  of 
Main  Street,  Buffalo,  under  the  title  of  Our  Chief  Thorotighfare. 

Quentin  Roosevelt,  a  Sketch  with  Letters,  has  been  published  by 
Scribner's  Sons. 

Roosevelt,  the  Happy  Warrior,  by  Bradley  Oilman  has  been 
published  by  Little,  Brown  and  Company. 


64  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

Davfd  Hummell  Greer,  Eighth  Bishop  of  New  York,  by  Rev. 
Charles  L.  Slattery,  has  been  published  by  Longmans,  Green  and 
Company. 

The  Story  of  Chautauqua  by  Jesse  Lyman  Hurlbiirt  published 
by  G.  P.  Putnam's  Sons  in  1921,  is  the  history  of  the  Chautauqua 
m.ovement. 

In  the  second  series,  volume  VI,  of  the  Papers  of  the  American 
Society  of  Church  History  edited  by  F.  W.  Loetscher  and  pub- 
lished by  G.  P.  Putnam's  Sons,  1921,  is  a  paper  by  E.  P.  Johnson 
on  missionary  work  among  the  Indians  during  the  eighteenth 
century. 

In  The  American  Historical  Review  for  October  1921,  appears 
the  second  installment  of  the  Journal  of  a  French  Traveller  in  the 
Colonies,  1765.     Pages  81-85  and  89  are  devoted  to  New  York. 

The  article  on  Architecture  in  the  History  of  the  Colonies  and 
of  the  Republic  by  Fiske  Kimball  in  The  American  Historical 
Review  for  October  1921,  is  conspicuously  weak  in  its  omission  of 
New  York  from  consideration. 

A  History  of  Hauppauge,  Long  Island,  N.  Y.,  by  Simeon  Wood 
has  been  published  by  Charles  J.  Werner  of  New  York. 

Among  the  Columbia  University  Studies  recently  issued  is  one 
entitled  The  Ratification  of  the  Federal  Constitution  by  the  State  of 
New  York  by  Clarence  E.  Miner.  (Longmans,  Green  and  Com- 
pany, New  York.) 

The  latter  portion  of  The  Journal  of  Madam  Knight  which  re- 
counts the  story  of  a  journey  from  Boston  to  New  York  in  1704, 
(newly  edited  by  Sarah  Knight  and  published  by  Small,  Maynard 
and  Company),  is  of  particular  interest  to  New  Yorkers. 

The  Life  of  Whitelaw  Reid  in  two  volumes  by  Royal  Cortissoz 
is  published  by  Charles  Scribner's  Sons. 

Of  interest  to  New  Yorkers  are  Michael  J.  O'Brien's,  Hidden 
Phase  of  American  History:  Ireland's  Part  in  America's  Struggle 
for  Liberty,  (N.  Y.,  Dodd  Mead  and  Company)  and  H.  E.  Eger- 
ton's  edition  of  Coke's  notes  of  The  Royal  Commission  on  the 
Losses  and  Services  of  American  Loyalists,  (Oxford:  Printed  for 
the  Roxburghe  Club). 

In  Appendix  IV  of  the  Report  of  the  Librarian  of  Congress  for 
IQ2I,  Waldo  G.  Leland  gives  a  Report  on  the  Transcription  of 
Documents  from  French  Archives  which  is  of  considerable  interest 
to  students  of  the  history  of  New  York  State. 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  65 

The  Library  of  Congress  has  received  letters  of  Martin  Van- 
Buren  to  N.  S.  Benton  (1828)  and  to  Robert  J.  Walker,  (1843); 
four  letters  of  Millard  Fillmore  to  S.  G.  Haven  (1839-40)  and 
letters  to  Frank  Taylor  (1853)  and  Ira  Harris  (1859).  This 
Library  has  the  largest  collection  of  Grover  Cleveland's  papers. 
The  Library  of  Congress  has  been  presented  by  Mr.  J.  Pierpont 
Morgan  with  some  photostat  letters  of  George  Washington  to  the 
Clintons,  his  correspondence  with  Colonel  Willett  in  reference  to 
the  abortive  attempt  to  capture  Oswego  in  1783,  his  military 
map  of  Eastern  New  York  and  the  Jerseys. 

In  the  Journal  of  the  Presbyterian  Historical  Society  for  June, 
IQ2I,  is  the  final  installment  of  the  articles  on  The  Records  of  the 
Middle  Association  of  Congregational  Churches  of  the  State  of 
New  York,   1806-1810  by  John  Quincy  Adams. 

In  the  Iowa  Journal  of  History  and  Politics  for  October,  1921, 
is  a  sketch  of  Wilson  Secley  Lewis,  Bishop  of  the  Methodist  Epis- 
copal Church  in  China.  He  was  born  in  Russell  in  St.  Lawrence 
County,  New  York,  July  17,  1857,  and  died  in  Sioux  City,  Iowa, 
August  21,   1921. 

In  the  Proceedings  of  the  Second  Annual  State  History  Conference, 
Bulletin  No.  13  published  by  the  Indiana  Historical  Commission 
is  an  article  entitled :  The  Relation  of  Community  History  to  State 
History  by  Nora  C.  Fretageot,  and  another:  What  the  D.  A.  R., 
and  Similar  Organizations  can  do  to  Promote  the  State's  History 
by   Mindell  Crampton   Wilson. 

In  the  Missouri  Historical  Review  for  April,  1921,  is  an  article 
entitled :  A  Guide  to  the  Study  of  Local  History  and  tJie  Collection 
of  Historical  Material,  by  Jonas  Viles  and  Jesse  E.  Wrench; 
and  in  the  July,  1921,  issue  there  is  an  article  entitled:  Populariz- 
ing State  History,  by  Floyd  C.  Shoemaker. 

In  the  Tennessee  Historical  Magazine  for  October,  1920,  is  a 
paper  on  The  Autobiography  of  Martin  Van  Buren,  by  W.  E. 
Beard. 

In  The  American  Review  of  Reviews  for  August,  1921,  is  an 
article  entitled:  From  New  York  to  Idaho:  A  Farm  Colony  of 
City  Folk,  and  Their  Modern  Caravan. 

The  American  Legion,  Department  of  Massachusetts,  has  pub- 
lished a  volimie  of  its  Annual  Proceedings  for  1920.  It  contains  a 
Partial  List  of  Publications  Relating  to   the   World   War  and   a 


66  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

catalogue   of  Lists  of  Massachusetts  Men  in   the    United  States 
Service,   by   Towns. 

Two  Colored  Women  with  the  American  Expeditionary  Forces, 
is  the  title  of  a  volume  by  Addie  W.  Hunton  and  Kathryn  M. 
Johnson  of  New  York,  published  by  the   Brooklyn  Eagle  Press. 

The  Negro  in  American  History,  is  the  title  of  a  volume  by  John 
W.  Cromwell  and  published  by  the  American  Negro  Academy, 
Washington,  D.  C.  Men  from  New  York  State  are  included  in 
the  treatment. 

Theodore  Roosevelt,  the  Man  as  I  knew  Him,  is  the  title  of  a 
volume  by  Frederick  C.  Inglehart,  published  by  Burt,  New 
York. 

In  the  publication  entitled  Contributions  of  the  Lowell  (Mass.) 
Historical  Society,  Vol.  II  No.  1,  there  is  an  article  by  Rev. 
Wilson  Waters  on  The  Writing  of  Local  History,  and  another  by 
Mrs.  Sara  S.  Griffin  on  The  Acadian  Exiles.  Some  of  these 
unfortunates  were  sent  to  our  New  York  towns,  but  only  a 
long,  a  patient  research  in  town  records  will  reveal  their  history. 

The  Wisconsin  Magazine  of  History  for  December,  1921,  has 
an  interesting  article  by  Joseph  Schafer  entitled  Documenting 
Local  History,  which  can  well  be  used  as  a  model  for  other  places 
than  those  in  Wisconsin. 

In  the  Daughters  of  the  American  Revolution  Magazine  for  No- 
vember, 1921,  is  an  article  by  J.  C.  Fitzpatrick  on  The  Com- 
mittees of  Correspondence  and  Safety  of  the  Revolutionary  War, 
and  another  by  T.  T.  Belote  on  Military  and  Naval  Medals  of 
the  war  of  1812-15,  both  of  which  have  material  on  New  York 
State. 

In  the  issue  of  Decem.ber  1921,  is  a  Hst  of  books  on  New  York 
State  history  which  have  been  donated  to  the  library  of  the 
D.  A.  R.,  in  Washington.  In  the  September,  1921,  is  an  article 
by  T.  T.  Belote  on  The  War  Medals  of  the  American  Revolution. 

In  the  Proceedings  of  the  Fifty-Sixth  Convocation  of  the  Univer- 
sity of  the  State  of  New  York,  held  in  1920  is  printed  an  address 
by  George  A.  Plimpton  on  Education  in  New  York  State  During 
the  Dutch  Period. 

In  the  Western  Pennsylvania  Historical  Magazine  for  October, 
1921,  is  an  article  by  Clarence  R.  Thayer  on  George  Croghan  and 
the  Struggle  for  the  Ohio  Valley.     Croghan  was  the    deputy    of 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  67 

Sir  William  Johnson  of  New  York.  In  the  same  number  is  con- 
tinued the  Account  Book  of  Casper  Reel  who  furnished  Croghan 
with  some  of  his  supplies  and  did  work  for  him. 

Captain  John  Deserontyou  and  the  Mohawk  Settlement  at  Deser- 
onto,  by  M.  Eleanor  Herrington  is  the  title  of  an  interesting 
pamphlet  published  by  the  Department  of  History  of  Queen's 
University,  Kingston,  Ontario.  It  contains  much  information 
about  Colonel  Guy  Johnson  and  Sir  John  Johnson,  drawn  from 
the  Canadian  Archives  at  Ottawa. 

The  Proceedings  of  the  Vermont  Historical  Society,  for  the  years 
1919-1920,  contains  the  account  of  "A  Journey  Through  Vermont 
and  New  York,"  in  1800,  probably  written  by  John  Russell 
Davis. 

In  the  January,  February,  March  1921  number  of  the  Journal 
of  American  History,  are  illustrations  of  the  Landing  of  the  First 
Dutch  Minister;  Governor  Bellomont  Reviewing  Troops;  Early 
Broad  Street;  Statue  of  Lincoln  in  Union  Square.  The  article 
on  the  history  of  banks  in  New  York  by  Bayles  and  Allaben  is 
continued  from  earlier  numbers.  Mrs.  Mary  L.  D.  Ferris,  has  a 
poem  entitled,   "A  True  Colonial  Dame." 

In  April,  May,  June,  1921  number  of  the  Journal  of  American 
History,  are  various  illustrations  on  the  early  history  of  New 
York  State:  Crown  Point  Monument;  Infant  School  in  New 
York  City,  1825;  Hudson's  Arrival:  Old  prints  of  New  Amster- 
dam, and  New  York  City,  1650,  1706;  Purchase  of  Manhattan 
Island;  New  Amsterdam  Dock;  Vander  Donck  map  of  New 
Netherlands;  Early  Dutch  Dwellings  in  New  York;  Plan  of 
New  York  in  1707;  Bill  of  Credit  of  1771;  Merchant's  Exchange; 
Sky  Line  of  New  York  200  years  ago;  Broad  Street  Below  Wall, 
in  Colonial  Days.  The  article  on  the  history  of  banking  in  New 
York  City,  by  Bayles  and  Allaben  is  continued. 

In  the  July,  August,  September,  1921  number  of  The  Journal 
of  American  History,  are  a  series  of  interesting  illustrations  of 
early  New  York  history:  A  map  of  Yonkers,  1847;  Interior  of  a 
school  in  New  York  City;  Broadside  of  George  III  proclaiming 
the  colonies  to  be  in  a  state  of  rebellion;  Old  swords  and  cannon 
balls  of  the  war  of  1812;  Entry  of  the  American  troops  in 
New  York  City  in  1783;  New  York  City  in  1776;  First  capitol 
of  the  United  States  in  New   York   City;  Tablet  on   the  Bank 


68  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

of  New  York;  Coffee  House  Slip;  First  page  of  the 
first  issue  of  the  Commercial  Advertiser;  Plan  of  New  York 
when  the  first  bank  was  established;  Promissory  note  of  1790. 
There  is  also  an  article  on  the  First  Bank  of  New  York. 

In  the  Pitkin  Papers,  I/'66-i76q,  published  as  volimie  XIX  of 
the  Collections  of  the  Connecticut  Historical  Society,  there  is  much 
material  relating  to  New  York  such  as  a  letter  from  Phineas 
Lyman  written  shortly  after  the  battle  of  Lake  George,  from  James 
Montresor  and  others.  See  the  index  under  various  personal 
names  of  New  Yorkers,  names  of  places  and  subjects. 

In  the  Annals  of  Iowa,  for  July  1921,  is  a  picture  of  a  bronze 
tablet  erected  by  the  Daughters  of  the  American  Revolution  to 
mark  the  Mormon  trails  through  Iowa.  In  the  necrology  are 
to  be  noted  among  the  Iowa  pioneers  several  who  were  born  in 
New  York  State;  Charles  Leach  Watrous,  Wihiam  Fiske  Cleve- 
land, Ezra  Willard,   Herbert  K.   Skinner. 

Schoharie  County  in  the  Revolution,  is  the  title  of  a  pamphlet 
containing  an  address  delivered  by  Judge  Dow  Beekman  at  the 
meeting  of  the  Captain  Christian  Brown  Chapter  of  the  Daughters 
of  the  American  Revolution,  on  September  10,  1920,  at  Cobleskill, 
New  York. 

Stuyvesant  Fish  has  published  privately  a  pamphlet  con- 
taining the  addresses  delivered  at  Continental  Village,  Putnam 
County,  New  York,  under  the  title  of  the  Unveiling  of  the  Memorial 
to  the  Mothers  of  the  Revolution,  October,  p,  iq2I. 

In  the  International  Molders  Union  of  North  America,  by 
Frank  T.  Stockton,  (Johns  Hopkins  University  Studies,  1921) 
considerable  space  is  given  to  the  part  played  by  members  from 
New  York  State. 

In  the  Public  Record  Office  (London),  C.  O.  1142,  is  the  fifth 
known  manuscript  copy  of  the  Duke's  Laws.  There  are  other 
copies  in  the  town  clerks'  offices  of  the  towns  of  Easthampton, 
Huntington,  and  North  Hempstead  on  Long  Island,  and  one  in 
the  State  Library  at  Albany. 

Volimie  5  of  the  Nieuw  Nederlandsch  Bio  grafts  ch  Woordenboek, 
the  new  Dutch  Biographical  dictionary  edited  by  P.  C.  Molhuysen, 
P.  J.  Blok  and  L.  Knappert,  which  was  issued  at  Leiden  in  1921, 
contains  a  sketch  by  Dr.  A.  Eekhof  of  Isaack  de  Rasiere,  secre- 
tary of  New  Netherland  under  Peter  Minuit,  which  among  other 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  69 

information  brings  out  the  new  facts  that  de  Rasi^re  was  baptized 
at  Middelburg  on  October  15,  1595;  that  he  had  a  son  Lourens 
baptized  in  Brazil  in  1636;  that  he  owned  three  sugar  mills  in 
Brazil,  named  "Den  Amstel,"  "Middelburgh,"  and  "La  Rasi^re;" 
and  that  on  September  3,  1654,  he  acknowledged  at  Rotterdam, 
before  Notary  Vitus  Mustehus,  that  he  had  received  one-seventh 
part  of  the  estate  of  his  wife's  parents. 

On  September  24,  1921,  the  Herkimer  Historical  Society  held 
its  meeting  and  voted  to  ask  for  bids  for  the  publication  of  another 
volume  of  its  proceedings.  Charles  L.  Fellows  read  a  paper  on 
"The  History  of  the  Yale  Lock." 

In  the  October  8,  1921,  issue  of  the  Utica  Press  is  an  article  on 
Newport  the  Home  of  the  First  Yale  Locks. 

Before  the  November  meeting  of  the  D.  A.  R.,  at  Schoharie, 
Lyman  Hoknes  read  a  paper  on  the  "Captors  of  Andr6,"  which 
was  published  in  the  Middlehurgh  News. 

In  the  F airport  Mail  for  October  13,  1921,  is  an  article  on  The 
Fairport  Historical  Club's  Activities  of  Thirty-seven  years. 

The  Lewis  H.  Morgan  Chapter  of  the  New  York  State  Archae- 
ological Association  has  just  pubHshed  a  booklet  by  Dr.  William 
M.  Beauchamp  entitled:  The  Founders  of  the  New  York  Iroquois 
League  and  Its  Probable  Date. 

The  Hendrick  Hudson  Chapter  of  the  D.  A.  R.  announces  the 
accession  to  its  collection  of  the  Diary  of  John  Dayton,  1802;  a 
copy  of  the  Columbia  Republican  for  1829;  and  many  other 
early  documents  of  historic  value. 

The  Rochester  Historical  Society  at  its  meeting  on  December 
12,  1921,  appointed  a  committee  on  publications  to  the  end  that 
more  work  should  be  done  along  such  lines. 

The  Cattaraugus  Times  for  September  20,  1921,  reproduces  a 
thesis  written  in  the  summer  session  of  the  Buffalo  Normal 
School,  1921,  by  Mrs.  C.  B.  Ford,  entitled:  History  of  the  Develop- 
ment of  Public  Schools  in  New  York  State. 

The  Rochester  Democrat  and  Chronicle  ior  September  4,  1921,  has 
an  article  on  Great  Sodus  Bay  entitled:  History  and  Romance. 

The  De  Ruyter  Gleaner  under  the  title  of  Some  Local  History 
in  its  issue  of  September  22,  1921,  narrates  the  story  of  Washing- 
ton's visit  to  the  Mohawk  forts  in  1783. 

In  the  Syracuse  Post-Standard  for  September  30,  1921,  Dr. 
W.  M.  Beauchamp  has  a  communication  on  Historical  Societies. 


70  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

The  Rensselaer  County  Standard  for  October  7,  1921.  carries  the 
address  of  James  A.  Beckett  on  the  Bennington  Battleground 
which  is  also  to  appear  in  the  Quarterly  Journal. 

The  Corfu  Enterprise  for  October  13,  1921,  carries  an  article 
entitled:  D.  Clinton  Original  Canal  Booster. 

The  Citizen  Sentinel  of  Ossining  in  its  issue  of  October  19,  1921, 
has  an  article  by  Charles  B.  Palmer  the  local  historian  on  the 
Old  Albany  Post  Road.  The  subject  is  to  be  continued  in  subse- 
quent issues. 

The  Herkimer  Citizen  of  October  26,  1921,  carries  Miss  Amelia 
Day  Campbell's  article  on  Women  of  the  Revolution  which  is  also 
to  appear  in  the  Quarterly  Journal. 

The  Mohawk  Turnpike  Book  is  in  preparation  by  the  Mohawk 
Valley  Historic  Association.  It  will  contain  110  views  of  the 
entire  valley  from  Schenectady  to  Rome. 

The  Bulletin  to  Schools  of  the  University  of  the  State  of  New 
York  and  the  State  Education  Department  beginning  with  its 
issue  of  November  1,  1921,  is  carrying  a  series  of  articles  under 
the  title  of  Governors  of  New  York  prepared  by  Dr.  James  Sullivan, 
the  State  Historian. 

In  the  Uiica  Observer  for  September  20,  1921,  is  an  article  on 
the  History  of  St.  Pauls  Church  at  Holland  Patent. 

The  Genealogy  of  the  Whittemore  Family  by  D.  S.  Zimmer 
traces  the  history  of  a  family  of  Endicott  which  became  promi- 
nently identified  with  the  town  of  Union  in  New  York  State. 

In  the  Catskill  Enterprise  for  October  13,  1921,  is  an  article  on 
the  Old  Slaughter  Houses  at  Catskill  Point  as  depicted  by  Thomas 
Cole,  the  early  American  artist  of  Hudson  river  scenery. 

The  Troy  Record  for  November  23,  1921,  has  an  article  on 
Historic  Shrines  in  Rensselaer  County. 

museums,  historic  monuments  and  remains 

There  has  been  presented  to  the  New  York  Historical  Society, 
a  large  collection  of  Dutch  household  utensils  gathered  by  Dr. 
George  W.  Nash  of  Ulster  County. 

The  famous  Glen  Island  Museum  (on  Glen  Island  in  Long 
Island  Sound)  of  historical  relics  collected  by  John  H.  Starin 
was  sold  at  auction  diuing  the  week  of  October  17,  1921.  The 
sale  was  conducted  by  Elliot  A.  Haaseman  at  254  West  47th  Street, 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  71 

New  York.  Among  interesting  items  relating  to  New  York 
State  was  an  old  fence  rail  from  Montgomery  County;  a  plough 
made  in  1769  in  the  town  of  Palatine  for  Henry  Klock  by  Matthew 
Thumb,  who  fell  in  the  battle  of  Oriskany;  two  carved  wood 
capitals  of  pilasters  removed  from  the  house  of  Louis  Philippe  who 
was  an  exile  in  Muller  Hill,  Madison  County,  N.  Y. ;  a  piece  cut 
from  the  baronial  mansion  of  Sir  William  Johnson;  a  pair  of 
hand  shackles  found  at  Fort  Ticonderoga;  a  brick  from  the  Old 
Fraunces  Tavern ;  a  brick  from  the  Old  Washington  Hotel  located 
at  Broadway  and  the  Battery,  New  York  City  (explanatory- 
letter  attached);  many  lots  of  New  York  newspapers;  a  map  of 
Starin  on  Glen  Island. 

The  De  Lancy  Cole  Camp  of  the  Sons  of  Veterans  has  re- 
cently purchased  the  Fuller  property  in  Peekskill  which  is  to  be 
converted  into  a  Public  Historical  Building  and  Museum. 

At  the  annual  meeting  of  the  Historical  Society  of  Saratoga 
held  on  September  19,  1921,  the  former  officers  were  reelected. 
It  was  reported  that  over  8,000  visited  the  Society's  collection  in 
the  Casino.  An  admission  fee  of  5  cents  is  now  charged  and 
brings  in  enough  revenue  to  pay  the  attendant. 

The  Flushing  Historical  Society  at  its  meeting  on  October  31, 
1921,  decided  to  place  its  fine  collection  of  museum  material  on 
exhibition  during  Saturdays  in  the  month  of  December. 

The  Tioga  Historical  Society  announces  many  new  gifts  to  its 
collection.  Among  others  may  be  mentioned  the  annual  cata- 
logues of  the  old  Owego  Academy  from  1849  to  1852  and  a  news- 
paper entitled  "The  Students'  Of ering''  published  by  the  students 
of  the  academy  in  1853. 

On  November  17,  1921,  the  Fort  Stanwix  Chapter  of  the  D.  A.  R., 
visited  the  site  of  Fort  Bull  near  which  at  the  side  of  the  New 
London  road  they  have  caused  a  marker  to  be  erected.  It  bears 
the  inscription:  "Two  hundred  and  fifty  paces  from  here  is  the 
site  of  Fort  Bull,  the  scene  of  fierce  struggles  during  the  early 
Indian  Wars,  20  years  before  the  Revolution."  There  is  a  fine 
boulder  monument  on  the  site  of  the  Fort  itself.  Dr.  W.  M. 
Stryker  and  W.  Pierpont  White  spoke  on  the  history  of  Fort 
Bull. 

The  Madison  County  Historical  Society  announces  the  acces- 
sion of  many  new  gifts. 


72  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

At  the  monthly  meeting  of  the  Oneida  Historical  Society  on 
December  12,  1921,  the  Committee  on  Monttments  announced 
the  repairs  it  was  having  made  to  the  Steuben  and  Oriskany 
monuments. 

While  examining  the  early  records  of  the  St.  Regis  Indians, 
Michael  Solomon  recently  found  a  lease  126  years  old.  The 
document  is  in  a  good  state  of  preservation,  is  in  the  handwriting 
of  William  Geray  and  conveys  the  use  of  certain  lands  near  the 
present  business  center  of  the  village  to  Antoine  Andre.  Andre 
erected,  according  to  local  tradition,  a  dwelling  and  blacksmith 
shop.  The  discovery  of  this  lease  establishes  the  fact  that  the 
first  settlement  in  Franklin  County  was  at  Hogansburg,  and  not 
in  Fort  Covington  as  erroneously  stated  in  several  local  histories. 

A  Hessian  soldier's  belt  buckle  has  been  found  by  historical 
workers  excavating  the  site  of  the  Revolutionary  war  prison 
camp  on  the  old  Dyckman  farm,  near  203d  Street,  New  York 
City.  The  buckle,  of  bronze,  is  in  a  perfect  state  of  preservation 
and  officials  of  the  field  exploration  committee  of  the  New  York 
Historical  Society,  say  it  is  one  of  the  few  Revolutionary  relics  of 
undoubted  Hessian  origin.  The  buckle  has  been  identified  as 
part  of  the  equipment  of  the  Fuerst  Frederick  or  Erb  Prinz  Reg- 
iment of  Hesse,  mercenaries  brought  over  by  the  British  to  fight 
Washington's  continentals.  On  the  front  of  the  buckle  is  en- 
graved the  monogram  "F.  F.",  surmounted  by  a  crown.  The 
original  hook  or  belt  holder  is  on  the  back. 

The  Fuerst  Frederick  regiment,  originally  688  strong,  took 
part  in  many  engagements  in  the  Revolution.  It  participated  in 
the  battle  of  Long  Island,  and  was  assigned  to  the  left  wing  of 
Earl  Percy's  force  at  the  battle  of  Fort  Washington.  Later  the 
regiment  was  sent  south  and  eventually  was  captured  at  York- 
town.  Upon  the  declaration  of  peace  the  survivors  were  return- 
ed to  New  York  to  await  transportation  home  and  during  this 
period  they  were  quartered  in  the  hut  cantonment  on  the 
Dyckman  farm. 

In  the  Hudson  Register  for  September  15,  1921,  is  a  statement 
with  reference  to  the  accuracy  of  the  bronze  tablet  recently 
placed  on  the  old  court  house  at  Claverack.  There  seems  to  be 
some  question  as  to  whether  the  implication  that  Hamilton  was 
actually  present  at  the  Crosswell  trial  is  correct. 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  73 

Preston's  Mill,  a  landmark  at  Maxwell  a  village  near  Sodus, 
erected  before  the  War  of  1812,  is  being  torn  down. 

Nine  cannon  balls  weighing  eight  pounds  each  were  unearthed 
last  week  on  the  Glens  Falls-Lake  George  highway  by  workmen 
engaged  in  digging  a  post  hole  to  erect  a  sign  board.  The  relics 
were  found  at  a  depth  of  about  20  inches.  The  workmen  found 
five  balls  and  then  refilled  the  hole,  deciding  to  make  their  ex- 
cavation in  another  spot.  Melvin  J.  Ball,  a  Glens  Falls  collector 
who  possesses  a  large  number  of  relics  hearing  of  the  discovery, 
went  to  the  scene  and  disinterred  four  more  cannon  balls  from  the 
same  hole.  These  cannon  balls  may  have  been  left  by  Baron 
Dieskau  on  his  expedition  to  meet  Sir  William  Johnson  at  Lake 
George  in  1755.  This  expedition  resulted  in  the  battle  of  Bloody 
Morning  Scout  in  which  Colonel  Ephraim_  Williams,  founder  of 
Williams  College,  fell. 

A  tablet  in  memory  of  the  Mothers  of  the  Revolution,  erected 
by  Stuyvesant  Fish  on  his  farm,  at  Continental  Village,  was 
unveiled  October  9,  1921.  The  dedicatory  address  was 
by  the  State  Historian,  James  Sullivan.  The  Sixth  Artillery 
Band  of  Peekskill  furnished  music  for  patriotic  singing.  The 
tablet  is  of  bronze,  cast  by  the  Gorham  Company  of  New  York. 
It  was  affixed  to  a  piece  of  native  granite,  standing  over  nine 
feet  high  and  weighing  more  than  fifteen  tons.  The  inscription 
reads : 

"Continental  Village  1776-1783. 

A  Mihtary  Post  and  Depot  of  Supplies.     Burned  by  the  British 

October  9,  1777. 

In  Memory   of  The  Mothers  of  the  Revolution  who  watched 
and  prayed  while  our  fathers  fought  that  we  might  be  free. 
They  also  serve  who  only  stand  and  wait." 

The  monument,  a  fifteen-ton  granite  boulder,  was  presented  by 
Stuyvesant  Fish.  Mr.  Fish's  grandsons,  Peter  Stuyvesant  Fish 
and  Nicholas  Fish,  clad  in  buff  and  blue  imitations  of  the  Con- 
tinental Army  uniforms,  unveiled  the  monimient  in  the  presence 
of  a  large  assemblage,  made  up  of  townspeople  and  representatives 
of  patriotic  societies.  Continental  Village  lies  in  Canopus  Hol- 
low, Putnam  County,  four  miles  north  of  Peekskill,  at  the  fifty- 
second  milestone  on  the  Old  Albany  Post  Road.     Inquiry  has 


74  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

failed  to  discover  an3rwhere  in  the  United  States  a  memorial  to 
the  wom^en  of  the  Revolution  collectively,  although  there  are 
monuments  to  individual  women  of  that  period. 

The  Huntington  Historical  Society  in  October  1921,  began  the 
nineteenth  year  of  its  existence.  Several  new  gifts  to  the  Society's 
Museum  have  been  announced. 

The  New  York  Historical  Society  in  October  gave  an  exhibition 
of  the  drawings  by  Charles  M.  Lefferts  which  show  the  uniforms 
in  use  during  the  Revolution  by  Am.erican,  British,  French  and 
Hessian  troops. 

On  October  16,  1921,  was  held  the  celebration  of  the  200th 
anniversary  of  the  founding  of  the  Reformed  Church  at  Schoharie. 
The  second  edifice  which  was  erected,  now  known  as  the  Old 
Stone  Fort  was  built  in  1772. 

Maple  Hill,  centiiry-old  Geneva  residence,  was  recently  sold. 
When,  in  June,  1825,  Gen.  Lafayette,  of  Revolutionary  renown, 
visited  Geneva  it  was  in  Maple  Hill  that  the  great  French  bene- 
factor was  entertained.  What  is  believed  to  be  the  largest  tree 
in  the  state,  measuring  twenty -four  feet  in  circumference,  was 
named  after  Lafayette  to  memorialize  his  visit.  The  old  residence 
typifies  the  stately  mansions  of  the  early  nineteenth  century  and 
ranks  in  history  with  the  Schuyler  mansion  of  Albany,  and  other 
historic  residences  of  that  period. 

The  bill  introduced  in  Congress  by  Senator  William  M.  Calder, 
for  a  survey  of  the  Saratoga  Battlefield  looking  to  its  eventual 
acquisition  by  the  Federal  Government  has  met  with  very  favor- 
able comment  by  the  press. 

The  discovery  in  Broome  County  in  the  town  of  Vestal  of  an 
inscription  in  stone  which  seemingly  records  the  death  of  one 
"William  Plat  Died  November  4th,  1721,"  has  raised  the  question 
as  to  whether  it  is  a  hoax  perpetrated  by  some  joker  or  an  authen- 
tic record.  On  a  superficial  examination  it  would  seem  to  be  the 
fonner,  but  a  chance  explorer  may  have  got  to  that  region  as 
early  as  1721. 

State  Archaeologist  Arthur  C.  Parker,  has  been  investigating  a 
great  Indian  flint  mine  in  the  neighborhood  of  Coxsackie. 

During  the  autumn  of  1921,  the  low  water  in  Lake  Champlain 
made  it  possible  for  visitors  to  Fort  Ticonderoga  to  see  the  sunken 
hulls  of  the  warships  Enterprise  and  Trumbull,  which  were  sunk 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  75 

at  the  time  of  Colonel  Brown's  attempt  to  capture  the  fort  from 
the  British  in  1777. 

The  historic  stone  house  on  West  Broadway  at  Cape  Vincent, 
on  the  river  front,  is  being  remodeled  in  its  interior. 

The  stone  house  was  built  in  1815  by  Vincent  Le  Ray,  who 
occupied  it  several  years.  In  1837  it  was  purchased  by  the 
Peugnet  brothers,  who  were  distinguished  officers  in  Napoleon's 
army,  who  left  France  after  the  downfall  of  the  emperor.  For 
many  years  it  was  the  stimmer  home  of  Mrs.  Fort,  of  New  York 
City,  a  daughter  of  Hyacinth  Peugnet. 

It  is  probably  the  oldest  and  certainly  one  of  the  m.ost  interesting 
houses  of  stone  in  Jefferson  County.  It  has  a  beautiful  river 
front  and  stately  trees  surround  the  mansion.  It  was  the  first 
house  in  the  village  built  of  stone,  boated  from  Carleton  Island, 
and  the  name  "stone  house"  has  clung  to  it  ever  since. 

While  cleaning  up  and  removing  furnishings  from  the  old  Bowne 
residence  in  Gouvemeur  recently,  which  was  recently  sold,  among 
a  pile  of  old  papers  sent  to  the  rubbish  was  a  copy  of  the  Franklin 
Telegraph,  the  first  newspaper  ever  published  in  Malone,  of  date 
April  2nd,  1829.  Colonial  money  dated  as  far  back  as  1775  was 
also  found  in  $2,  $3,  $5,  $8,  $10  and  $30  denominations.  The 
bills  were  of  heavy  paper  printed  in  black  ink  and  were  payable 
in  gold  or  silver  Spanish  dollars.  There  was  a  $10  bill  issued 
by  the  Colony  of  New  York  of  that  date  and  a  ten-pound  note  of 
date  1758;  also  a  two  pence  note  issued  by  the  city  of  New  York 
in  1790.  The  Bowne  family  settled  in  Gouverneur  in  1814  and 
brought  m.any  of  the  relics  found  there  with  them. 

The  collections  of  battle  flags  in  the  capitol  at  Albany  are  in 
many  cases  in  such  a  poor  state  of  preservation,  that  the  Legis- 
lature is  to  be  asked  for  an  appropriation  to  restore  them. 

The  Rochester  Historical  Society  announces  that  it  has  re- 
ceived a  photograph  of  the  house  of  Colonel  Rochester  (founder 
of  the  city),  which  used  to  stand  on  Spring  Street.  It  is  the 
intention  of  the  Society  to  put  up  a  marker  at  the  site. 

WORLD    WAR    MEMORIALS   AND    COLLECTIONS 

Mr.  Robert  B.  Lockhart  of  32  South  Washington  Street, 
Rochester,    New  York,   is   seeking  information  about   all   New 


76  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

York  men  who  entered  the  service  of  the  armies  and  navies  of  the 
alHes  of  the  United  States,  during  the  World  War. 

The  plans  and  elevation  of  the  National  Victory  Memorial 
Building  to  be  erected  in  Washington  in  honor  of  the  World  War 
Veterans,  have  been  published  in  the  newspapers. 

The  Oneonta  Post  of  the  American  Legion  has  appointed  a 
committee  to  assist  in  compiling  the  story  of  Oneonta's  part  in 
the  World  War. 

The  City  of  New  Rochelle  has  projected  a  most  beautiful 
memorial  to  the  men  from  that  city  that  took  part  in  the  World 
War. 

The  village  of  Clifton  Park  in  Saratoga  County,  has  erected  a 
memorial  to  its  men  who  served  in  the  World  War. 

The  State  of  Massachusetts  has  had  models  made  of  a  me- 
morial which  it  purposes  to  erect  at  St.  Mihiel,  France,  in  honor  of 
its  men  who  fell  in  the  taking  of  that  salient.  In  this  as  in  past 
records  of  wars  this  state  shows  itself  more  progressive  than  the 
others.     That  is  why  she  gets  the  credit. 

The  Oneida  Historical  Society  (Utica),  had  its  regular  meeting 
on  October  10,  1921.  Several  gifts  were  announced  among  them 
being  the  records  of  the  memorial  Com.mittee  of  the  World  War, 
and  a  scrap  book  of  the  same  committee,  November  13,  1918  to 
August  6,  1920. 

The  History  of  the  A.  E.  F.  By  Shipley  Thomas.  (New 
York  1920),  covers  the  part  played  by  the  New  York  divisions  in 
the  World  War. 

The  Monroe  County  Board  of  Supervisors  granted  permission 
to  the  Bar  Association  to  erect  a  tablet  in  the  Court  House  in 
honor  of  the  lawyers  and  law  clerks  who  served  in  the  World 
War.     It  was  unveiled  November  11,  1920. 

How  America  Went  to  War,  by  Benedict  Crowell  and  Robert 
F.  Wilson,  is  being  published  by  the  Yale  University  Press  in 
six  volumes. 

The  Biu-eau  of  Labor  Statistics  at  Washington  has  published  a 
History  oj  the  Shipbuilding  Labor  Adjustment  Board  by  W.  E. 
Hotchkiss  and  H.  R.  Seager.     It  appears  as  Bulletin  No.  283. 

The  Plattsburg  Movement:  A  Chapter  of  America's  Participation 
in  the  World  War,  by  Ralph  B.  Perry  has  been  published  by 
Button. 


^. 


<<* 


The 
Quarterly  Journal 

of  the 

New  York  State  Historical 
Association 


-t; 


Volume  III  April    1922  Number  2 


Entered  as  second  class  maU  matter  October  22.    1919.  at  the  Post  Office  at   Albany    New  York 
under  the  Act  of  August  24.  1912. 


4^ 


NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION 

Quarterly  Journal 

Editorial  Coitunittee 

JAMES  SULLIVAN,  Managing  Editor 
DIXON  R.  FOX  FREDERICK  B.  RICHARDS 


CONTENTS 

CONSERVATION  IN  NEW  YORK  STATE         -        C.   R.    Pettis        77 

THE  PULTENEY  PURCHASE     -        -        -         -      Paul  D.   Evans        83 

SURROGATES'    COURTS    AND    RECORDS    IN    THE    COLONY 
AND   STATE  OF  NEW  YORK   1664-1847 

-        -         _____    Royden  Woodward  Vosburgh       105 

REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS 117 

Hurlbut,  The  Story  of  Chautauqua;  Miner,  The  Ratification  of 
the  Federal  Constitution  by  the  State  of  New  York;  Naber, 
Henry  Hudson's  Reize,  etc.  1609;  Brown,  Base  Hospital  No.  g 
A.  E.  F.;  Sutliffe,  The  Seventy-first  New  York  in  the  World 
War;  Harrington,    Yonkers  in  the   World   War. 

NOTES  AND  QUERIES 123 


*3ubBcription  Price  $1.50  Single  Numbers  40  cenis 

Address  all  contributions  and  communications  to 
New  York  State  Historical  Association,  Albany. 


THE   BRONZE  INDIAN  AT  LAKE  GEORGE 
BATTLEGROUND 

(Donated  to   the    Association   bv   George    D. 
Pratt) 


VOL.  III.  APRIL  1922  NO.  2, 


1  he  (Quarterly  J  ournal 

of  the  New  York  State  Historical  Association 


CONSERVATION  IN  NEW  YORK  STATE^ 

Conservation  has  for  its  purpose  keeping  the  resources  of  the 
world  in  sufficient  abundance,  so  that  man  may  have  a  happy, 
fruitful  life,  free  from  suffering— a  relatively  easy  physical  ex- 
istence. It  is  the  aim  of  conservation  to  reduce  the  intensity  of 
struggle  for  existence,  to  make  the  situation  more  favorable,  to 
reduce  mere  subsistence  to  a  subordinate  place  and  thus  give  an 
opportunity  for  development  to  a  higher  intellectual  and  spiritual 
level.  The  conservation  movement  in  general  took  form  through 
the  efforts  which  have  been  made  for  more  conservative  use  of  our 
natural  resources,  and  today  has  a  far  broader  meaning  and  is 
applied  to  a  vast  number  of  our  activities. 

The  conservation  movement  in  New  York  cannot  be  appreciated 
without  a  realization  of  the  history  of  what  has  happened  in  the 
past.  In  the  brief  time  which  is  allotted,  it  is  impossible  to  dis- 
cuss all  of  the  numerous  phases  of  conservation  in  this  State; 
therefore,  I  have  taken  the  liberty  of  confining  my  talk  to  the 
forests,  because  we  can  observe  typical  conditions  and  one  from 
which  the  same  lessons  can  be  drawn.  Conservation  has  passed 
through  periods  similar  to  that  which  we  have  in  the  history  of  the 
State.  There  is  the  period  of  discovery,  exploitation,  settlement, 
industry,  and  finally  the  beginning  of  true  conservation. 

John  Verrazzano,  Hendrick  Hudson  and  Samuel  Champlain 
made  their  famous  discoveries  and  sailed  away  without  leaving 
any  new  occupancy  in  this  newly  foimd  territory.  The  first 
record  of  settlement  by  white  men  was  the  building  of  houses  on 
Manhattan  Island  in  1614.  These  houses  were  built  of  wood  from 
the  surroimding  forest,  and  only  nine  years  later,  in  1623,  there 
were  three  sawmills  in  operation,  which  had  been  built  by  the 

lAn  address  delivered  at  the  Lake  George  meeting  of  the  New  York  State 
Historical  Association,  October  3,  1921. 


78  C.  R.  PETTIS 

Dutch  West  India  Company  at  New  Amsterdam.  Their  erection 
marks  the  beginning  of  the  exploitation  of  the  forests  of  the 
Empire  State.  The  habits  of  the  old  world  were  brought  by  the 
settlers  to  the  new.  Sawmills  were  common  in  Holland,  but 
they  were  unused  in  England,  because  the  laboring  class  opposed 
labor-saving  machinery  and  had  destroyed  many  mills.  England 
had  no  sawmills  imtil  after  1768,  while  the  early  Dutch  Colony  at 
New  Amsterdam  had  a  mill  nearly  150  years  previous.  The 
Earl  of  Bellomont,  writing  to  the  Lords  of  Trade  of  England  on 
January  2,  1701,  said:  "They  have  got  about  forty  sawmills  in  the 
Province  of  New  York,  which  I  hear  rids  more  wood  or  destroys 
more  timber  than  all  of  the  mills  in  New  Hampshire.  Four  saws 
are  the  most  in  New  Hampshire  that  work  in  one  mill.  Here  is  a 
Dutchman  lately  come  over  who  is  an  extraordinary  artist  at  these 
mills.  He  has  made  a  mill  that  has  twelve  saws."  As  early  as 
1700  Governor  Bellomont  recommended  that  each  person  who 
removed  a  tree  should  pay  for  planting  five  or  six  young  trees,  and 
that  no  trees  should  be  cut  which  were  marked  for  the  use  of  the 
navy.  Sir  William  Johnson,  as  early  as  1770,  spoke  of  the  de- 
struction of  the  forest,  and  said  that  in  one  case  nearly  4,000  logs 
were  cut  in  the  woods  near  Saratoga,  which  were  lying  rotting  in 
the  woods  because  they  were  unable  to  remove  them.  The  first 
steps  in  conservation  were  taken  in  order  to  insure  for  the  future  the 
sizes  and  kinds  of  timbey  required  by  the  King  for  his  navy.  In 
1770  Adolphus  Benzel  of  Sweden  was  appointed  inspector  of  his 
Majesty's  Woods  and  forest  in  the  vicinity  of  Lake  Champlain  at 
a  salary  of  £300  per  annum.       He  resided  at  Crown  Point. 

As  settlements  increased,  there  was  a  recurrence  of  events  the 
same  as  at  New  Amsterdam.  Andries  Corstiaensen  with  two 
sawyers  came  to  Fort  Orange  from  Holland  in  1630.  The  same 
year  two  sawyers  settled  at  Rensselaenv^'^ck.  In  1636  Barent 
Koeymans  joined  the  colony  and  in  the  fall  of  1645  took  charge 
of  the  Patroon's  miUs.  Within  two  years  this  mill  cut  over  4,000 
boards.  In  1673  Koejnnans  built  a  mill  about  twelve  miles  below 
Albany,  probably  at  the  site  of  the  present  Village  of  Coeymans. 
An  analysis  of  the  settlement  of  New  York  State  shows  that  saw- 
mills were  erected  within  four  to  fifteen  years  of  the  time  of  the 
first  settlements  in  each  locality.  It  is  difficult  to  find  exact 
records  showing  when  the  first  steam  sawmill  was  built  in  this 


CONSERVA  TION  IN  NEW  YORK  ST  A  TE  79 

State.  A  sawmill  driven  by  steam  power  was  built  as  early  as 
1830  in  the  town  of  Newark  Valley,  Tioga  county,  by  Chester 
Patterson  and  Jonathan  Day,  which  employed  30  men. 

New  York  was  not  only  a  forest  State,  but  it  was  essentially  a 
white  pine  State.  This  valuable  species  predominated  through- 
out the  entire  area.  The  history  of  the  State  is  replete  with 
various  facts  in  this  connection.  The  forests  of  the  Adirondack 
and  Catskill  plateau  abound  in  spruce,  while  hardwood,  or  broad 
leafed  trees,  are  present  generally  mixed  more  or  less  abundantly 
with  evergreens  throughout  the  State.  This  vast  forest  wealth 
made  colonization  and  settlement  possible.  Next  to  the  fur 
trade,  limiber  was  the  great  article  of  export  of  the  colonies.  As 
early  as  1626,  the  colonies  had  shipped  lumber  to  Holland.  The 
white  pine,  which  was  cut  in  the  Champlain  Valley,  except  that 
from  the  southern  part  of  the  lake,  was  transported  to  Quebec 
and  exported  to  England,  while  that  from  the  south  end  came  to 
Skenesborough  (Whitehall)  and  was  transported  seventy  miles  in 
winter  on  sledges  to  Albany  and  then  down  the  Hudson  River 
through  the  port  of  New  York  to  Europe,  West  Indies  and  the 
Southern  colonies.  Naturally  these  became  centers  of  industry. 
Albany  was  such  eighty  years  ago,  and  at  one  time  surpassed  all 
other  points  in  the  amount  of  lumber  handled  and  volimie  of 
business.  In  1872  there  were  forty-three  wholesale  firms,  whose 
yards  were  grouped  in  the  Albany  lumber  district  and  these 
handled  a  product  then  valued  at  $15,000,000  per  year.  Over 
1,500  men  were  employed.  Today  the  lumber  yard  has  passed 
into  history  and  the  area  has  been  largely  given  over  to  other  in- 
dustries. 

Tonawanda  later  became  a  center  and  its  business  rapidly  in- 
creased from  1865  tmtil  1890.  Oswego  has  also  been  an  im- 
portant distributing  point.  The  upper  Hudson  has  been  a  source 
of  supply  for  nearly  a  century.  Log  driving  there  began  about 
1813.  Glens  Falls  has  been  the  center  of  a  district  where  the  logs 
from  this  part  of  the  Adirondacks  were  manufactured.  The  logs 
were  floated  from  near  the  place  of  cutting  to  the  mill.  In  1849 
the  Hudson  River  Boom  Association  was  organized  to  handle  the 
holding  and  sorting  of  logs  belonging  to  various  operators.  -  The 
books  of  this  company  give  an  indication  of  the  volimie  of  ma- 
terial which  this  area  has  supplied.     In  1851  there  was  "boomed" 


80  C.  R.  PETTIS 

26^  million  feet;  the  following  year  69  million  feet;  and  this 
increased  to  its  peak  in  1872  when  there  were  214  million  feet; 
but  it  has  since  declined  until  in  1900  only  56^  million  feet  were 
received.  Even  the  City  of  New  York,  owing  to  its  export  trade, 
is  still  the  center  of  an  immense  limiber  trade.  In  1900,  the  total 
receipts  of  lumber  aggregated  nearly  one-half  billion  feet. 

As  we  travel  through  the  State  we  notice  only  the  remains  of  the 
mills,  which  have  played  their  part  in  marketing  this  great  forest 
crop.  Centers  of  industry  have  been  changed  to  the  Great 
Lakes  States  and  to  the  South,  and  a  very  short  time  ago  to  the 
Pacific  coast.  The  great  mass  of  hemlock  forest  was  cut  off  in 
our  State  and  usually  only  the  bark  was  utilized  while  all  the  logs 
were  left  in  the  woods  to  decay.  In  1865,  according  to  the  census, 
there  were  820  tanneries  in  the  State  and  today  there  are  com- 
paratively few.  It  is  estimated  that  six  million  feet  of  hemlock 
were  cut  each  year  and  that  all  of  these  logs  being  peeled  were 
left  in  the  woods  to  decay.  A  new  use  of  wood,  which  is  paper, 
came  into  being  and  this  has  greatly  increased  the  demand  upon 
the  forest. 

Some  of  our  far-seeing  statesmen  have  appreciated  this  situa- 
tion, and  as  long  ago  as  1822  Governor  DeWitt  Clinton  in  his 
message  called  attention  to  the  need  of  preserving  timber  supplies. 
In  1872  a  law  was  passed  creating  a  State  Park  Commission  and 
this  was  instructed  to  make  inquiries  with  reference  to  preserving 
and  appropriating  wild  land  lying  north  of  the  Mohawk  with  a 
view  to  creating  a  State  Park.  This  Commission  foimd  the  State 
then  owned  only  40,000  acres  in  that  section.  There  was  a  ten- 
dency on  the  part  of  the  owners  to  form  a  combination  for  the 
enhancement  of  value.  For  these  reasons  no  purchases  were 
made.  They  recommended,  however,  that  a  law  forbidding  the 
further  sale  of  State  owned  lands  be  passed  and  that  lands  which 
the  State  acquired  through  non-payment  of  taxes  be  retained  by 
the  State.  It  was  eleven  years  later,  in  1883,  that  this  recommen- 
dation became  a  law,  and  the  State  then  became  possessed  of 
substantially  600,000  acres  of  land  in  the  Adirondack  and  Catskill 
sections. 

The  next  question  arose  as  to  its  management,  and  in  1884  the 
Comptroller  was  authorized  to  employ  experts  to  make  a  report 
on  a  system  of  forest  preservation.     The  result  of  their  efforts 


CONSERVA  TION  IN  NEW  YORK  ST  A  TE  81 

was  the  establishment  of  a  Forest  Commission  in  1885.  This  was 
given  the  care  and  control  of  this  property  and  was  authority  in 
the  matter  of  forest  fire  protection.  The  new  Commission  found 
itself  technically  charged  with  the  protection  of  a  vast  area  of  land 
of  which  little  was  known  even  as  to  its  location.  These  men 
worked  diligently,  endeavoring  to  locate  the  land  and  protect  it 
from  trespass  and  fire,  but  they  were  physically  imable  to  meet  the 
situation.  The  result  was  continued  trespass  upon  the  State 
property.  The  Constitutional  Convention  in  1894  adopted  a 
very  drastic  provision  in  regard  to  the  control  of  the  State  forest 
lands.  In  brief,  it  provided  that  the  lands  constituting  the 
Forest  Preserve  should  not  be  leased,  sold,  exchanged  or  taken  by 
any  person  or  corporation,  nor  should  the  timber  thereon  be  cut, 
sold  or  destroyed. 

The  State  Forest  Preserve  has  been  increased  through  pur- 
chases. Prior  to  1909,  $4,075,000  were  appropriated  for  this 
piupose.  By  these  fimds  478,000  acres  of  land  were  bought  in 
the  Adirondacks  and  nearly  52,000  acres  in  the  Catskills.  Since 
that  time  $5,000,000  additional  have  been  made  available  for  the 
acquisition  of  forest  land,  and  today  the  State  Forest  Preserve 
contains  1,936,492  acres.  The  central  portions  of  the  Adirondack 
and  Catskill  regions  have  been  by  law  designated  as  "Adirondack 
and  Catskill  Park,"  respectively,  and  in  these  areas  the  State  is 
actively  engaged  in  acquiring  additional  forest  land. 

A  system  of  forest  fire  protection  was  begun  in  1885,  but  in 
1909  it  was  elaborated,  extended  and  improved,  and  by  means  of 
a  paid  force  of  rangers  the  forest  section  is  now  patrolled  and 
policed.  The  setting  of  fires  is  regulated  and  certain  provisions  of 
the  law  in  regard  to  disposal  of  slash  are  enforced.  Camp  sites 
are  provided  where  fires  can  be  set  in  safe  places  and  telephone 
lines  have  been  extended  to  the  top  of  fifty-two  mountains  where, 
in  most  cases,  steel  towers  have  been  erected,  and  observers  are 
employed  and  kept  in  these  observation  lookouts  during  the  entire 
fire  season.  From  these  the  watchers  can,  by  turning  on  their 
heel,  scan  the  horizon  and  observe  any  smokes  from  fires,  which 
are  within  their  vision,  by  means  of  field  glasses.  By  the  use  of 
the  telephone  they  can  quickly  notify  the  rangers  or  other  mem- 
bers of  the  forest  fire  organization  and  these  dispatch  a  force  to  the 
fire  and  make  it  possible  to  extinguish  these  fires  while  they  are 


82  C.  R.  PETTIS 

still  in  their  incipient  stage  and  before  they  have  caused  the  usual 
destruction  and  damage. 

In  1902,  the  first  State  Forest  Nursery  was  established  at 
Saranac  Inn.  This  nursery  has  been  increased  in  size,  and  other 
nurseries  at  Saratoga,  Salamanca  and  Central  Islip  established. 
Here  millions  of  trees  are  being  grown  from  seed.  These  trees 
are  sold  to  private  owners  for  reforesting  purposes  at  cost  of  pro- 
duction and  are  used  to  plant  unproductive  land  owned  by  the 
state. 

The  forest  fire  protective  system  two  years  ago  was  extended  to 
cover  the  forests  on  Long  Island,  and  during  the  past  season  has 
been  further  increased  to  cover  the  remaining  forest  sections  of  the 
State  in  eastern,  southeastern  and  southwestern  New  York. 

As  we  scan  the  history  of  the  State  we  pass  from  a  period  of 
primeval  forest,  the  playground  of  various  Indian  tribes,  and  in 
less  than  four  centuries  we  come  down  to  the  period  of  our  own 
civilization.  The  intensity  of  industry  is  causing  us  to  feel  the 
pinch  caused  by  the  scarcity  of  our  forest  supplies.  The  time  has 
come  when  we  must  halt  and  take  an  inventory  of  our  resources, 
and  this  will  show  us  that  we  are  today  in  this  state  using  about 
fifteen  times  as  much  timber  as  we  are  producing.  We  have 
millions  of  acres  of  land  in  this  State  which  are  lying  idle 
and  are  best  adapted  to  forest  production.  If  given  proper  fire 
protection  and  planted  with  suitable  trees,  it  will  produce  our 
necessary  wood  materials. 

We  cannot  longer  go  blindly  ahead  and  expect  Nature  to  supply 
the  need  without  help.  Every  one  must  do  his  part  in  helping  to 
obtain  the  wise  use  of  the  remaining  natural  resources  and  plan 
for  future  production  of  such  resources  as  are  renewable. 

C.  R.  Pettis 


THE  PULTENEY  PURCHASE^ 

One  of  the  ntimerous  disputes  over  state  boundaries  which 
troubled  the  relations  of  the  newly  independent  colonies  broke 
out  between  Massachusetts  and  New  York  soon  after  the  Revolu- 
tion. Though  conviction  was  firm  enough  on  both  sides,  feeling 
happily  did  not  run  high  in  the  matter.  It  was  agreed  that  a 
settlement  of  the  difficulty  should  be  sought  in  a  meeting  of  repre- 
sentatives of  both  states.  Thus  at  the  end  of  the  year  1786  a 
compromise  was  arrived  at.  To  New  York  was  assigned  the 
jurisdiction  over  the  disputed  territory  and  to  Massachusetts  was 
given  the  ownership  of  the  land.  The  restdt  was  the  transference 
to  the  latter  state  of  the  title  to  practically  all  of  the  land  in  the 
present  State  of  New  York  west  of  a  line  running  due  north  and 
south  through  Seneca  Lake. 

Grieved  as  were  some  of  the  proud  citizens  of  Massachusetts  to 
lose  the  political  control  over  such  a  large  body  of  rich  land,  the 
great  majority  of  the  leaders  in  the  State  were  highly  pleased  by 
the  award.  The  finances  of  the  commonwealth  were  badly  out  of 
joint;  an  immediate  cash  sale  of  the  New  York  lands  would 
considerably  relieve  those  financial  difficulties.  Willing  buyers 
were  almost  at  once  found  in  an  association  headed  by  Oliver 
Phelps  and  Nathaniel  Gorham.  These  associates,  though  quite 
unable  to  pay  cash  for  the  vast  tract  of  six  million  acres  which 
already  was  known  as  the  Genesee  Country,  were  confident  that 
before  the  successive  installments  should  become  due  and  payable 
to  the  state  treasury  they  would  be  able  to  sell  enough  of  their 
holdings  to  make  the  payment  possible.  In  the  spring  of  1788 
the  sale  was  consummated.  By  it  the  State  transferred  to  Phelps 
and  Gorham  and  their  associates  its  right  of  preemption  to  the 
entire  Genesee  Country.  The  associates  set  out  at  once  to  secure 
from  the  Indians  their  title  to  the  Genesee  and  before  the  end  of  the 

lAn  address  delivered  at  the  Lake  George  meeting  of  the  New  York  State 
Historical  Association,  October  4,  1921. 

83 


84  PA  UL  D.  EVANS 

year  had  managed  to  obtain  from  them  the  cession  of  somewhat 
over  two  million  acres,  this  being  the  eastern  third  of  the  tract. ^ 

Sales  in  the  lands  thus  freed  from  the  Indian  title  were  begun  at 
once  and  continued  with  much  success  until  the  simimer  of  1790 
when  the  residue  with  the  exception  of  two  tracts  reserved  was 
sold  to  Robert  Morris.  This  residue  comprised  about  1,300,000 
acres,  of  which  the  larger  part  was  located  in  the  southern  portion 
of  the  original  purchase  in  what  is  now  Steuben  County.  Morris's 
agents  were  already  in  Europe  looking  for  wealthy  investors  in 
some  of  his  innumerable  enterprises.  One  of  them,  WiUiam 
Temple  Franklin,  now  succeeded  in  interesting  a  group  of  English 
capitalists  in  land  speculation  on  the  Genesee.  The  resvilt  was  the 
sale  of  the  whole  tract  just  acquired  by  Morris  to  Sir  William 
Pulteney,  John  Hornby  and  Patrick  Colquhoun.  This  group 
was  variously  known  as  the  English  Company,  the  Pulteney 
Association  and  the  London  Assodates.  Indeed  at  a  later  period 
after  the  death  of  Sir  William  Pulteney  the  lands  which  they  had 
purchased  were  often  though  eironeously  referred  to  as  the  Pul- 
teney Estate,  this  term  being  properly  appHed  only  to  the  lands 
apportioned  to  Pulteney  in  1801. 

We  do  not  know  just  what  were  the  plans  of  these  English 
capitalists  when  they  determined  to  invest  part  of  their  fortunes 
in  the  wilds  of  America.  Like  other  land  speculators  of  the  day, 
whether  rich  or  poor,  beginning  their  business  on  a  shoestring  or 
backed  by  thousands  of  pounds  of  capital,  they  may  have  ex- 
pected to  hold  their  lands  but  a  short  time  until  the  rise  of  prices 
should  have  made  the  speculation  a  profitable  one,  and  then  to 
sell  out  at  wholesale  as  they  had  purchased.  They  may  on  the 
other  hand  have  counted  on  reselling  rapidly  at  retail.  At  most 
their  vision  of  such  sales  could  hardly  have  contemplated  a  system 
which  woiild  work  more  slowly  than  that  of  Phelps  and  Gorham. 
Those  gentlemen  had  been  able  to  dispose  of  most  of  their  lands 
before  Morris's  large  purchase  by  sales  in  blocks  of  half  or  whole 
townships.  Such  a  system  obviated  the  necessity  of  the  burden- 
some detail  inseparable  from  sales  in  smaller  lots  and  freed  the 
proprietor,  if  he  wished,  from  much  of  the  expense  involved  in 
development  schemes.     It  is  probable  that  the  English  proprietors 


THE  PULTENEY  PURCHASE  85 

considered  theirs  a  short  term  investtnent  which  could  in  case  of 
need  be  realized  upon  at  almost  any  date. 

It  should  be  noted  however  that  there  was  a  fundamental  differ- 
ence between  these  proprietors  and  a  large  proportion  of  the  men 
in  America  who  at  the  time  were  speculating  in  lands.  Many  of 
the  Americans  were  buying  lands  with  barely  sufficient  money  to 
make  even  initial  cash  payments  for  them.  Their  purchases 
contemplated  as  small  an  amount  as  possible  for  the  first  payment 
and  the  rest  in  installments  as  far  distant  as  could  be  arranged. 
The  speculator  counted  upon  sufficiently  good  fortune  to  permit 
him  to  find  a  purchaser  at  a  profit  before  any  of  the  later  install- 
ments should  fall  due.  Such  speculators,  far  from  having  the 
means  for  the  development  of  their  purchases,  could  with  difficulty 
hold  them  long  enough  to  make  advantageous  resales.  The 
English  Company  on  the  other  hand  not  only  paid  cash  for  its 
lands  but  expected  to  invest  further  sums  in  them  in  order  to 
facihtate  their  resale  to  responsible  and  solid  purchasers.  Quite 
unconscious  of  the  extent  to  which  such  expenditures  would 
involve  them  the  English  proprietois  were  about  to  embark  on  a 
project  which  would  have  bankrupted  any  other  land  company 
in  America  except  that  group  of  Dutch  capitalists  who  were  just 
then  buying  up  the  lands  in  the  extreme  western  part  of  the  State. 

An  agent  of  course  was  necessary  on  the  lands  and  as  their 
representative  they  selected  Charles  Williamson,  an  energetic, 
optimistic  gentleman  who  was  possessed  of  unbounded  confidence 
in  the  future  prosperity  of  the  country  to  which  he  was  being  sent. 
He  was  a  man  whose  hopes  and  dreams  shaped  his  actions  as 
often  as  did  his  reason.  His  judgment  was  not  over  sound  nor 
his  understanding  of  his  situation  altogether  clear.  Too  often  he 
was  prone  to  forget  that  he  was  coming  to  America  to  make 
profits  on  a  business  investment  rather  than  to  develop  the  Genesee 
into  the  fairyland  of  the  western  world.  When  he  stopped  to 
consider  the  strictly  business  side  of  his  operations,  he  found  it  not 
at  all  difficult  to  convince  himself  of  the  identity  of  his  principals' 
interests  and  the  development  schemes  in  which  he  was  so  fertile. 

Williamson  reached  America  in  the  latter  part  of  the  year  1791. 
Every  influence  which  touched  him  thereafter  gave  an  added 
impetus  to  the  glowing  enthusiasm  which  possessed  him;  every 


86  PAUL  D.EVANS 

bit  of  counsel  which  reached  him  gave  new  support  to  the  wisdom 
of  the  schemes  he  was  contemplating.  Never  had  the  fever  of 
land  speculation  run  higher  in  America  than  in  the  winter  of 
1791-92.  Never  had  the  public  been  more  convinced  of  the  rich 
profits  awaiting  the  man  who  had  courage  and  money  enough  to 
play  the  land  game  as  they  thought  it  should  be  played,  as  William- 
son wanted  to  play  it.  No  one  in  America  had  greater  confidence 
in  these  rosy  prospects  than  that  same  Morris  who  had  sold  the 
lands  to  Williamson's  principals.  To  him  the  agent  went  for 
advice  and,  according  to  Morris  himself,  it  was  he  who  shaped 
Williamson's  early  plans.^  Added  to  this  was  the  stimiilation  of 
the  example  offered  to  all  landholders  by  Judge  Cooper  of  Coopers- 
town.  His  development  schemes  were  being  talked  of  far  and 
wide  at  the  time  and  undoubtedly  they  gave  encouragement  to  the 
newly  arrived  agent. 

A  detailed  account  of  Williamson's  activities  during  his  decade 
of  management  in  the  Genesee  is  not  possible  here.  Long  and 
interesting  accounts  can  be  found  in  the  local  histories.  The 
general  lines  of  his  policy  alone  can  be  taken  up  in  this  paper. 

Williamson  was  firmly  convinced  that  the  financial  interests 
of  his  principals  as  well  as  the  material  advantages  of  his  settlement 
required  a  large  amount  of  direct  and  positive  encouragement  on 
the  part  of  the  agent  to  the  early  settlers.  This  might  cost  a 
great  deal  but  it  was  the  only  way  by  which  the  country  could  be 
opened  rapidly  to  cultivation  and  be  quickly  filled  up,  the  only 
way  therefore  by  which  the  proprietors  could  quickly  gain  that 
great  increase  in  the  value  of  unsold  lands  which  was  the  direct 
result  of  surrounding  settlements  and  which  Williamson  counted 
upon  to  enrich  them.  The  proprietors  must  build  roads  and 
improve  the  navigation  of  streams  in  order  to  facilitate  the  coming 
of  settlers  and  make  easy  the  carrying  of  their  products  to  market. 
"Want  of  communications  is  the  great  draw  back  on  back  settle- 
ments distant  from  the  rivers  which  run  into  the  Atlantic," 
Williamson  wrote  to  one  of  his  principals  soon  after  his  arrival  in 
America.^  "Remove  this  difficulty  and  there  can  be  no  doubt 
that  the  gentlemen  of  the  Association  will  reap  an  advantage 
fifty  times  their  outlay;  and  come  to  their  purpose  many  years 
sooner."  Towns  must  be  established  both  to  serve  as  markets  to 
the   country   roundabout  and   to   stimulate  society  among  the 


THE  PULTENEY  PURCHASE  87 

settlers.  Stores  must  be  provided  so  that  the  newcomers  might 
not  want  for  suppHes  and  provisions.  Hotels  and  inns  must  be 
erected  for  the  accommodation  of  the  land  lookers.  Saw  mills 
must  be  set  up  to  make  possible  the  erection  of  substantial  and 
handsome  houses  and  bams,  and  grist  mills  for  the  convenience  of 
the  farmers.  Aid  must  be  given  here  and  there  to  attract  de- 
sirable artisans  and  needed  professional  men.  Model  farms  must 
be  established  to  serve  as  examples  to  the  settlers  of  the  possibilities 
of  their  own  holdings.  The  settlers  must  be  assisted  in  the  pay- 
ment of  their  debts  to  the  Company  by  the  acceptance  of  pay- 
ment in  kind,  by  the  loan  of  expensive  appliances  such  as  potash 
and  maple  sugar  kettles,  and  by  the  erection  of  distilleries  and 
potasheries  where  the  settlers's  products  might  be  taken.  All 
this  and  more  Williamson  believed  should  be  done  by  the  pro- 
prietors in  order  to  give  life  and  activity  to  their  lands.  After 
a  few  years  of  experience  he  became  convinced  that  as  a  general 
policy  for  land  holders  all  such  improvements  should  be  carried 
out  during  the  surveys  and  before  a  single  settler  should  be  ad- 
mitted to  the  lands.  Thus  high  prices  could  be  charged  from  the 
outset  and  only  the  best  class  of  settlers  brought  on.^  Williamson 
realized  that  if  the  proprietors  should  not  make  these  improve- 
ments private  capital  would  eventually  do  so  but  not  soon  enough 
to  serve  his  ends.  The  settlement,  he  reasoned,  would  be  unduly 
protracted,  a  poor  type  of  settlers  would  alone  come  on  at  first, 
and  the  proprietors  would  have  to  wait  for  years  to  realize  their 
investment.  Better,  he  believed,  by  far  to  invest  some  thousands 
of  dollars  additional  and  so  reap  large  and  immediate  profits. 
Williamson's  expenditures  for  the  development  of  communication 
were  largely  determined  by  his  vision  of  the  future  trade  routes 
through  the  Genesee.  He  had  been  in  America  hardly  six  months 
before  he  became  convinced  that  the  logical  outlet  for  the  products 
raised  upon  his  agency  was  by  way  of  the  Susquehanna  system 
southward  to  Baltimore.  From  that  direction  also  he  expected  to 
obtain  a  large  share  of  his  settlers.  This  route  appeared  to  him 
much  superior  to  the  long  and  tedious  trail  which  led  around  the 
ends  of  the  lakes  to  the  waters  of  the  Mohawk  and  thence  to  the 
Hudson  and  New  Yoik.  A  road  would  be  necessary  to  open  this 
line  of  communication  for,  though  counted  upon  to  be  of  great  use 
in  the  transportation  of  heavy  and  bulky  produce,  the  Susque- 


88  PAUL  D.EVANS 

hanna  system  was  not  expected  to  take  care  of  the  business  which 
required  rapid  movement  nor  to  serve  at  all  seasons  of  the  year. 
Williamson  therefore,  before  he  had  sold  an  acre  of  his  land,  pro- 
ceeded to  lay  out  the  course  of  a  road  which  would  connect  the 
outposts  of  settlement  in  Pennsylvania,  then  at  the  present  city 
of  Williamsport,  with  his  lands  on  the  Genesee.  This  road  ran 
northward  through  Blossburg  to  Painted  Post  and  then  westward 
through  Hornellsville  and  Dansville  to  its  terminus  at  Williams- 
burg on  the  Genesee  River.^  The  construction  work  on  this  road 
was  done  during  the  fall  and  winter  of  1792. 

This  was  the  earliest  as  well  as  the  largest  of  Williamson's 
road  enterprises  but  it  was  for  him  only  the  beginning  of  such  work. 
Not  a  year  went  by  thereafter  without  some  fresh  construction 
which  would  assist  new  settlers  to  reach  the  lands  and  the  old  to 
get  their  products  to  market.  The  local  histories  give  an  im- 
pressive list  of  such  enterprises.^  Among  the  others  there  were 
two  famous  routes  which  the  agent  built  in  part,  one  the  Niagara 
or  Ridge  Road  connecting  the  Genesee  with  the  Niagara  River 
in  which  Williamson  joined  with  Ellicott,  the  agent  of  the  Holland 
Land  Company;  the  other  the  state  road  from  Fort  Schuyler  to 
Geneva.  Williamson  was  largely  responsible  for  the  legislative 
act  which  authorized  this  latter  road.  He  also  made  some  attempts 
to  improve  the  water  communication  between  his  lands  and  the 
outside  world,  especially  to  the  southward.  On  the  whole  the 
money  which  he  expended  to  develop  communications  appears  to 
have  been  better  laid  out  than  almost  any  other  sums  spent  for  the 
improvement  of  his  agency. 

Other  development  enterprises  were  more  costly.  Bath,  at  the 
head  of  navigation  to  the  south,  Williamson  expected  to  be  the 
great  metropolis  of  his  section.  He  laid  out  the  town  accordingly 
and  expended  large  sums  to  assist  its  early  growth.  If  it  were  to 
become  the  handsome  progressive  city  which  he  hoped,  its  be- 
ginnings must  not  be  too  lowly;  it  must  from  the  start  be  an 
attractive  place  for  settlers;  there  must  be  no  waiting  for  the 
comforts  and  pleasures  of  old,  established  communities.  He 
had  erected  at  once  two  saw  mills  in  order  to  assure  an  abundant 
supply  of  lumber  for  frame  houses  and  other  structures;  he 
brought  with  him  a  force  of  thirty  or  forty  laborers  to  hasten  the 
work  of  city  building.     These  and  others  he  put  to  work  clearing 


THE  PULTENEY  PURCHASE  89 

the  site  of  the  town  and  erecting  a  large  number  of  buildings 
which  he  considered  indispensable  to  its  progress.  A  theatre  was 
erected  and  at  the  edge  of  town  a  clearing  of  one  hundred  acres 
made  to  provide  space  for  a  race  track.  Several  dwelling  houses 
were  put  up  by  the  agent  and  other  frame  buildings  that  might 
serve  various  purposes.  Not  far  from  the  town  extensive  farms 
were  cleared,  large  numbers  of  frame  houses  and  bams  erected 
on  them,  and  the  farms  were  plentifully  stocked  with  cattle,  sheep 
and  hogs.  At  Williamsburg  on  the  Genesee  a  similar  project  was 
worked  out  on  a  somewhat  smaller  scale.  At  Geneva,  already  an 
established  village,  a  pretentious  hotel  was  erected  which  compared 
favorably  in  size  and  equipment  with  the  better  hotels  of  the  old 
cities  on  the  seaboard.  Here  too  he  put  up  a  house  and  office  for  a 
printer  whom  he  induced  to  come  upon  his  agency.  Northward 
at  Sodus,  which  Williamson  dreamed  of  transforming  into  a  great 
commercial  city  through  which  would  flow  all  the  great  trade  be- 
tween the  Genesee  and  Canada,  he  laid  out  the  plan  of  a  large 
town,  set  up  extensive  mills,  erected  a  large  tavern,  built  a  store- 
house and  a  wharf  and,  having  placed  a  pleasure  boat  on  the  lake, 
he  connected  the  whole  by  a  new  road  with  the  settled  communities 
to  the  southward.  This  Sodus  enterprise,  says  Turner,  cost  over 
$20,000  during  the  first  two  years.'^  At  Lyons  a  series  of  frame 
buildings  were  erected  for  the  accommodation  of  the  local  agent, 
for  whom  also  a  large  farm  was  cleared,  a  store  house  and  distillery 
were  set  up,  and  not  far  away  were  established  large  and  finely 
equipped  mills  which,  it  is  said,  cost  Williamson  more  than  $12,- 
000.  Dotting  the  whole  of  his  agency  were  other  mill  sites  im- 
proved at  the  expense  of  the  proprietors,  farms  cleared  and  stocked 
and  provided  with  frame  houses  and  bams,  and  taverns  with  small 
farms  attached  to  them.  All  this  and  much  more  was  the  product 
of  Williamson's  development  schemes  during  the  decade  of  his 
agency.  He  had  been  given  a  free  hand  and  almost  unlimited 
resources.  Now  let  us  see  how  much  his  activities  had  cost  the 
proprietors. 

Unhappily  no  detailed  accounts  of  the  expenditures  are  now 
available.  It  is  necessary  to  rely  upon  certain  general  figures 
which  have  survived  through  the  care  of  that  antiquarian  Turner 
who  embodied  such  an  amount  of  information  in  his  books  for  the 
reader  who  has  the  patience  to  hunt  it  out.     He  was  given  access 


90  PAUL  D.EVANS 

to  most  of  the  agency  records  in  existence  in  1850  and,  though  he 
did  not  make  extensive  use  of  them,  none  the  less  he  did  incorporate 
something  from  them  in  his  work  on  the  Phelps  and  Gorham 
Purchase.  He  tells  us  that  in  1800  the  books  of  the  agency  showed 
a  total  expenditure,  including  the  original  cost  of  the  lands,  of 
$1,374,470.10.8  There  had  been  received  for  lands  sold  but  $147,- 
974.83.  The  lands  purchased  from  Morris  had  cost  the  EngHsh 
Associates  £75,000,  or  at  the  exchange  of  that  date  about  $350,000. 
Other  purchases  had  been  made  thereafter  but  these,  or  most  of 
them,  had  not  been  paid  for  in  1800,  as  Turner  adds  that  in  ad- 
dition to  the  expenditure  mentioned  above  the  agency  owed  for 
principal  and  interest  on  lands  purchased  over  $300,000.  It 
would  appear  therefore  that  the  principal  invested  by  Williamson 
in  his  development  schemes  plus  the  interest  which  had  accrued 
upon  it  to  the  year  1800  fell  not  much  short  of  a  million  dollars. 
This  figiu-e  is  confirmed  by  a  statement  of  his  successor,  Troup, 
"that  the  brilliant  schemes  of  Williamson  had  cost  Pulteney  more 
than  £200,000  sterling. "^ 

Part  of  this  money  was  excellently  laid  out  no  doubt  and  was 
quite  essential  to  the  wellbeing  of  the  agency.  This  is  particularly 
true  of  the  money  spent  on  roads  and  most  of  that  put  into  mills. 
Moreover  a  very  large  item  of  expense  is  not  to  be  laid  to  the 
account  of  Williamson.  That  was  the  great  sum  which  resulted 
from  the  attempt  to  colonize  on  the  Genesee,  German  immigrants 
fresh  from  Europe.^"  That  scheme  apparently  originated  with 
Mr.  Colquhoun,  the  managing  director  in  London;  Williamson 
was  in  no  way  to  blame  for  its  failiire.  The  agent  of  the  Holland 
Company  learned  at  the  time  that  the  expense  of  bringing  these 
immigrants  from  Germany  to  the  Genesee,  210  in  all,  had  amounted 
to  very  nearly  $30, 000.  ^^  Before  he  was  rid  of  them  they  must 
have  cost  Williamson  half  as  much  more. 

Whatever  blame  attaches  to  the  other  expenditures,  however, 
Williamson  must  bear.  Most  of  them  were  ill  timed,  many  of 
them  were  altogether  ill  judged,  and  it  seems  certain  that  a  large 
part  of  them  might  better  have  been  left  to  private  initiative. 
The  taverns  were  too  costly  for  the  condition  of  the  country  and 
like  the  model  farms  they  proved  very  difficult  of  management 
through  tenants.  The  race  courses,  the  theatre,  the  improve- 
ments at  Sodus,  and  most  of  the  private  farms  proved  very  ex- 


THE  PULTENEY  PURCHASE  91 

pensive  without  giving  any  proper  return;  they  seem  to  have  had 
no  effect  at  all  in  stimulating  desirable  immigration.  The  taverns, 
many  of  the  mills,  the  potasheries  and  distilleries  would  all  have 
come  of  themselves  as  soon  as  the  prospect  of  their  success  would 
have  warranted  the  investment  of  private  funds.  Nor  does  it 
appear  that  the  settlement  of  the  lands  would  in  that  case  have 
been  materially  retarded.  WilHamson's  attempt  to  "hurry 
civilization"  Was  not  a  success  either  from  the  point  of  view  of  the 
settlement  or  its  proprietors;  "hothouse  settlements"  in  the  back 
woods  were  very  unlikely  to  succeed.  He  did  win  the  love  of  his 
settlers  but  he  could  not  make  profits  for  his  principals  nor  in  the 
end  give  any  real  advantage  to  his  settlement.  Eventually  indeed, 
his  policy,  generous  and  well  intended  as  it  was,  brought  real 
difficulties  upon  the  settlers  of  the  Pulteney  lands.  His  ex- 
penditures had  been  so  great  and  such  a  large  part  of  them  had 
been  of  such  character  as  give  back  no  returns  that  actually  the 
agency  was  less  able  when  he  left  it  than  when  he  came  to  pay  a 
fair  return  on  the  money  invested.  As  a  result  the  agents  who 
followed  Williamson  were  not  in  a  position  to  offer  to  the  over- 
burdened settlers  the  same  measiu^e  of  relief  which  they  might 
have  given  had  they  not  been  engaged  in  an  attempt  to  get  out  of 
the  agency  the  money  which  Williamson  had  sunk  in  it. 

We  do  not  know  how  much  the  English  proprietors  when  they 
made  their  piu-chase  expected  to  advance  for  its  development. 
Probably  however  not  as  much  as  the  piu-chase  price  of  the  lands. 
They  very  soon  found  that  amount  exceeded  and  shortly,  as  the 
drafts  upon  them  continued  to  pour  in  from  America,  they  be- 
came more  than  a  little  uneasy.  First  they  remonstrated  with 
Williamson,  then  warned  him  and  at  last,  when  no  sign  appeared 
of  a  cessation  of  such  drafts  and  their  patience  was  exhausted, 
they  refused  any  longer  to  honor  his  drafts.  This  was  in  the  fall 
of  1798.  Sir  William  Pulteney,  who  had  invested  three-fourths  of 
the  capital  of  the  association,  was  becoming  old  and  under  the 
constant  drain  of  funds  to  America  had  begun  to  fear  the  loss  of  his 
whole  fortune.  He  preferred  rather  to  lose  the  whole  of  his  outlay 
on  the  Genesee  lands, — hence  the  severity  of  his  action.  William- 
son might  have  been  very  greatly  embarrassed  thereafter  had  not 
one  of  his  friends  come  to  his  aid  at  this  point.  Cazenove,  there- 
tofore the  Holland  Company's  agent  in  America,  returned  at  the 


92  PAUL  D.EVANS 

time  to  Amsterdam  and  on  his  way  through  London  interced- 
ed with  Pulteney  in  Williamson's  behalf.  The  baronet,  having 
recently  come  into  more  funds,  was  persuaded  to  advance  further 
credit  to  his  agent.^^  Williamson  as  a  result  was  enabled  to  com- 
plete some  of  the  enterprises  which  had  been  abandoned  when  his 
funds  had  been  cut  off. 

Regarding  the  whole  affair  as  simply  an  untimely  interruption 
to  his  work,  Williamson  appears  to  have  gone  ahead  thereafter  as 
before.  At  any  rate  about  a  year  later  his  principals  decided 
that  a  change  of  policy  was  essential  to  their  solvency  and  that  no 
such  change  was  possible  under  Williamson's  management.  It 
was  necessary  to  seek  for  another  agent.  Moreover  the  interests 
of  the  proprietors  in  London  made  it  desirable  at  the  same  time 
that  their  association  be  dissolved  and  a  partition  made  of  the  lands 
and  debts.  The  division  was  made  in  1801  on  the  basis  of  nine 
twelfths  to  Pulteney,  two  twelfths  to  Hornby  and  one  twelfth  to 
Colquhoun.  It  seems  that  in  the  division  Hornby  and  Colquhoun 
received  more  than  this  proportion  of  bonds  and  mortgages  while 
Pulteney  received  more  of  the  unsold  lands.  A  settlement  was 
amicably  arranged  with  Williamson.  Hornby  and  Colquhoun 
united  in  the  selection  of  Johnstone,  a  companion  of  Williamson, 
for  the  management  of  their  estates;  Pulteney  selected  Robert 
Troup,  a  New  York  lawyer,  who  had  played  a  large  part  in  the 
settlement  with  Williamson.  Our  story  hereafter  loses  from  view 
the  lands  of  the  two  minor  partners  not  because  they  were  im- 
important  but  because  there  is  no  information  available  con- 
cerning them.  It  will  rather  follow  Troup  and  the  new  era  in  the 
history  of  the  Pulteney  lands. 

Even  here  the  task  is  not  an  easy  one.  The  sources  for  the 
history  of  the  Pulteney  administration  during  the  next  twenty 
years  are  meagre  enough.  Only  here  and  there  do  we  get  brief 
glimpses  of  the  activity  of  the  agent  and  some  idea  of  the  policy  he 
was  pm-sviing.  From  1820  onward  for  the  next  decade  the  corre- 
spondence between  Troup  and  the  agents  of  the  Holland  Company 
adds  considerably  to  our  knowledge  of  events  on  the  Pulteney 
lands,  giving  us  backu'ard  views  now  and  then  of  Troup's  activities 
during  the  preceding  twenty  years. 

Troup's  principles  in  the  management  of  his  agency  were 
radically  different  from  those  of  his  predecessor.     He  believed 


flttST   EXGAGEMKXT 

/  77ie  Hoad .  -?  Frftirh  S  Iiuliiin.t 

JOendricK    on  Borsrl <  rk     i  Itoii'i  uti 

i       \fo/niM  I   i 


s 


THE   BLOODY  MOKMNO  bCOLT  IN   THE   BATTLE  OF   LAKE 
GEORGE 

(From  an  old  print) 


THE  PULTENEY  PURCHASE  93 

that  enough  and  more  had  been  done  by  the  owner  for  the  develop- 
ment of  the  lands  and  that  the  time  had  come  for  the  strictest 
economy.  All  further  expenditures  for  improvements  might 
safely  be  left  to  the  initiative  of  the  settlers;  his  duty  was  to 
collect  for  his  principaP^  every  cent  that  was  possible  in  an  en- 
deavor to  get  back  at  least  the  money  invested  with,  if  possible, 
some  small  rettim  upon  it.  To  accomplish  this  not  only  was  it 
important  to  continue  steadily  the  sale  of  lands  still  in  his  hands 
but  much  more  to  collect  upon  the  contracts  made  by  his  prede- 
cessor. Collections  indeed  made  up  Troup's  chief  problem  during 
his  thirty  years  of  control. 

Desirable  as  were  cash  sales  they  were  almost  impossible  in  the 
land  business,  this  whether  at  wholesale  or  retail.  Most  land 
owners  recognized  this  from  the  beginning;  those  who  did  not 
soon  learned  it  from  experience.  There  was  relatively  little  free 
wealth  available  in  America  at  the  time  for  such  ptu-chases  and 
fortune  brought  but  rarely  such  rich  buyers  as  the  Pulteney  group 
and  the  Dutch  merchants  who  went  under  the  name  of  the  Holland 
Land  Company.  The  men  who  came  to  settle  on  the  lands  not 
infrequently  had  spent  every  cent  they  possessed  in  moving  their 
families  into  the  back  country  and  in  purchasing  the  rude  equip- 
ment necessary  to  begin  life  there.  Others  somewhat  better 
situated  financially  were  unable  to  obtain  cash  for  their  farms  in 
the  east  at  the  time  of  moving.  Often,  when  at  last  they  had 
received  what  was  owing  them,  their  debts  for  supplies,  pro- 
visions, etc.,  in  the  new  settlement  had  accumulated  to  such  an 
extent  as  to  eat  up  the  whole  amount  received,  leaving  nothing  to 
be  applied  upon  the  land  debt.  The  great  majority  of  those  coming 
to  the  new  country  had  to  rely  upon  the  produce  of  their  new 
farms  for  most  of  their  payment  to  the  land  agent.  This  of  course 
meant  that  a  credit  basis  was  the  only  one  ordinarily  practicable 
in  the  retail  sale  of  wild  lands.  Another  cause  not  to  be  over- 
looked for  the  establishment  of  the  credit  system  in  the  land 
business  was  the  presence  of  millions  of  acres  on  the  market  seeking 
for  settlers.  There  were  few  proprietors  indeed  who  under  the 
circumstances  could  hold  their  lands  until  cash  paying  purchasers 
should  take  them  off  their  hands.  This  was  especially  true  after 
the  federal  government  in  1800  had  adopted  the  credit  system  for 
the  disposal  of  its  vast  tracts. 


94  PAUL  D.EVANS 

That  sales  then  should  be  made  to  settlers  on  credit  was  taken 
for  granted;  the  point  to  be  determined  was  the  amount  which 
should  be  required  as  a  preliminary  deposit  at  the  time  of  sale  and 
the  length  of  credit  thereafter  to  be  allowed.  Williamson's 
policy  had  been  to  give  all  small  purchasers  a  six  year  credit  with 
6%  interest,  one  half  the  debt  due  at  the  end  of  three  years  and  the 
rest  at  the  expiration  of  the  credit.  Of  these  men  he  required  no 
payment  at  the  time  of  the  sale.  Men  who  bought  lots  larger 
than  160  acres  were  at  first  required  to  make  a  cash  payment  of 
one  third  and  to  pay  the  balance  at  the  end  of  three  years.  These 
stricter  terms  seem  later  however  to  have  been  relaxed,  particular- 
ly for  those  who  purchased  quarter,  half  or  whole  townships. 
Such  sales  were  counted  quite  too  valuable  to  be  lost  by  insisting 
upon  the  terms  originally  announced. 

Important  as  it  seemed  in  the  early  days  the  matter  of  the 
length  of  credit  offered  did  not  however  continue  to  interest  the 
agents  greatly.  They  were  concerned  rather  with  the  problem 
of  getting  the  payments  at  all  from  the  settlers.  Very  few  of 
these  were  able  to  meet  their  contracts  within  the  stipulated  time. 
Many  of  them  at  the  end  of  the  sixth  year  had  made  no  payments 
whatever  upon  the  principal  of  their  land  debts;  they  had  done 
fairly  well  if  they  had  kept  up  the  interest  and  had  accumulated  no 
outside  debts.  Most  of  them  had  worked  extremely  hard  in  an 
endeavor  to  get  on,  intending  always  to  pay  the  land  agent  but 
not  able  to  produce  sufficient  wealth  to  enable  them  to  do  so. 
True  some  were  simply  lazy  and  from  them  nothing  ever  coiild  be 
hoped  save  that  they  wotild  be  fortunate  enough  to  sell  out  even- 
tually to  an  abler  farmer  from  the  East  who  might  soon  begin  to 
make  payments.  Others  overwhelmed  by  the  difficulties  of  their 
tasks  had  despaired  of  success  and  were  solacing  themselves  in 
liquor.  The  great  majority  however  were  a  hardworking,  well 
intentioned  lot  whose  names  remained  on  the  agency's  books  of 
debtors  only  from  plain  inability  to  get  them  off. 

Troup  knew  rather  well  the  character  of  his  settlers  and  he 
endeavored  to  Conform  his  policy  to  it.  He  required  his  sub- 
agents  to  seize  every  occasion  to  spur  the  settlers  to  payment, 
encouraging  them  at  all  times  to  pay  even  the  smallest  sums 
when  larger  ones  were  not  possible.  He  soon  learned  that  more 
than  mere  urging  was  necessary  to  secure  payments  from  most  of 


THE   PULTENEY    PURCHASE  95 

his  farmers;  some  sort  of  assistance  must  be  given  them  to  aid 
them  in  reducing  their  debts.  Accordingly  he  introduced  a 
system  of  payment  in  kind  which  permitted  the  farmer  to  make 
his  payments  in  wheat,  pork,  or  pot  and  pearl  ashes.  This  system 
seems  to  have  met  a  certain  measure  of  success.  That  it  did  not 
work  out  more  brilliantly  was  due  to  the  fact  that  the  agent  paid 
no  more  than  the  market  price  for  the  produce  taken.  The 
settler  who  had  raised  relatively  little  preferred  to  sell  for  cash  and 
so  be  free  to  lay  out  his  money  for  needs  more  immediate  than  the 
reduction  of  his  land  debt.  There  were  in  fact  a  certain  number 
of  the  settlers  who  always  let  their  immediate  needs  push  their 
land  debt  into  the  background.  Sometimes  they  were  simply  the 
ne'er  do  wells;  sometimes  the  refractory.  Against  them  Troup, 
after  his  patience  was  exahusted,  took  the  action  which  the  law 
permitted,  i.  e.,  ejection  without  compensation  for  their  improve- 
ments. This  was  possible  where  no  title  had  passed  and  the  settler 
was  holding  simply  on  contract;  when  a  bond  and  mortgage  had 
been  given,  the  debt  was  foreclosed  and  the  premises  sold  ac- 
cordingly. From  the  scanty  records  available  it  does  not  appear 
that  Troup  ptusued  a  stern  policy  in  such  ejectments  and  fore- 
closures. All  of  the  victims  had  been  warned  over  and  over 
again  and  repeated  extensions  of  time  had  been  granted  them  for 
payment.  The  advertisements  for  sale  under  foreclosures  be- 
tween 1811  and  1815  were  mostly  for  lands  sold  by  Williamson  in 
1795  and  1796  on  contracts  due  in  1800  and  1801.^'*  Upon  many 
of  these  no  payments  whatever  had  been  made.  Greater  leniency 
than  this  could  not  justly  have  been  asked.  Troup's  leniency 
was  the  result  both  of  inclination  and  of  policy.  A  stern  course 
pursued  toward  delinquent  debtors  would  have  served  simply  to 
drive  them  from  the  lands.  Conditions  made  it  impossible  to 
find  better  men  to  take  their  places  and  clearings  which  remained 
unworked  for  a  few  years  were  shortly  so  overrun  with  second 
growth  saplings  and  underbrush  that  they  were  worth  less  than  the 
virgin  soil. 

Troup's  efforts  at  collection  were  not  without  effect.  Within 
four  years  after  he  had  taken  charge  of  the  agency  he  had  secured 
from  his  settlers  nearly  $150,000.*^  The  years  following  were 
almost  as  fruitful.  At  the  end  of  two  decades  of  service  he  was 
able  to  report  that  clear  of  all  taxes,  agency  charges  and  other 


96  PAUL  D.  EVANS 

expenses  he  had  sent  to  his  principals  in  England  neariy  $850,000.^® 
Three  years  later  this  sum  had  mounted  to  well  over  a  million, 
almost  as  much  as  Pulteney's  original  investment.  Discouraging 
as  had  been  the  outlook  at  the  end  of  Williamson's  administration, 
the  results  of  persistent  effort  in  the  collection  of  sums  due, 
combined  with  the  most  careful  economy  had  brightened  the 
appearance  of  the  enterprise  considerably.  None  the  less  Troup's 
most  difficult  days  lay  ahead  of  him.  There  was  trouble  on  foot 
of  a  sort  that  he  had  not  yet  encountered. 

After  the  passing  of  the  first  fright  to  which  the  border  war 
gave  rise,  the  second  conflict  with  England  proved  a  great  boon  to 
the  settlers  of  the  Genesee  country.  The  presence  of  large  bodies 
of  troops  in  western  New  York  created  an  unwonted  market  for 
the  settlers'  produce,  and  at  the  same  time  offered  excellent 
opportunity  to  the  farmers  in  their  slack  months  to  add  to  their 
income  by  hauling  supplies  of  all  sorts.  The  government  paid 
liberally  and  in  cash.  Although  many  of  the  fortunate  settlers 
promptly  paid  up  their  land  debts,  some  of  the  others,  believing 
in  the  continued  patience  of  the  agent,  preferred  to  use  their 
profits  in  other  ways.  The  agent  however  determined  that 
stronger  measures  were  necessary  to  get  payments  from  such  men 
and  conceived  the  idea  of  charging  compound  interest  upon  the 
debts.  This  seemed  all  the  more  necessary  as  the  amount  of 
accumulated  interest  was  mounting  rapidly. 

At  the  time  no  particular  protest  appears  to  have  been  called 
forth  by  this  new  charge  upon  the  debtor.  When  later  however 
the  hard  times  of  1819  and  the  early  '20s  hit  the  Pulteney  lands, 
many  of  the  settlers  began  to  complain.  By  the  end  of  that 
decade  the  complaints  had  become  very  loud  and  bitter,  especially 
in  Steuben  County  where  the  expected  benefits  of  the  Erie  Canal 
had  failed  to  materialize  and  where  on  the  contrary  it  was  generally 
felt  that  the  settlers  were  relatively  worse  off  than  before  the  canal 
had  gone  through. 

Isolated  complaints  soon  grew  into  united  protest  and  by  1830 
Troup  found  that  a  large  share  of  his  land  debtors  had  combined 
to  force  upon  him  a  modification  of  his  terms  and  a  general  re- 
duction in  their  debts.  Interesting  as  is  the  story  of  the  conflict 
which  was  then  joined  between  agent  and  settler,  there  is  room 


THE    PULTENEY    PURCHASE  97 

here  for  none  of  the  detail. ^^  A  word  however  must  be  said  for 
the  cause  of  the  settlers. 

In  1827  and  1828  the  Holland  Land  Company,  which  had 
originally  owned  over  three  million  acres  to  the  west  of  the  Pulteney 
lands,  had  arrived  at  the  conclusion  that  most  of  its  settlers  would 
be  unable  to  pay  off  their  contract  debts.  So  little  progress  had 
been  made  in  this  direction  during  the  preceding  decade  that  the 
Company  resolved  voluntarily  to  reduce  the  debts  to  such  a  level 
that  the  settlers  could  feel  certain  of  eventually  paying  them. 
Accordingly  a  revaluation  was  made  which  cut  down  the  amount 
owing  to  the  Company  by  nearly  a  million  dollars.  Moreover  to 
prevent  the  debts  again  falling  in  arrears  a  liberal  system  of  pay- 
ment in  kind  was  introduced  which  gave  the  settler  considerably 
higher  prices  for  his  produce  when  apphed  to  the  payments  of 
interest  on  the  land  debt  than  when  sold  elsewhere.  The  results 
had  been  altogether  satisfactory  to  the  Holland  Company.  A 
new  spirit  of  enterprise  had  been  breathed  into  their  settlements 
which  promised  much  for  the  futtire. 

The  news  of  these  concessions  spread  at  once  of  course  to  the 
Pulteney  lands  and  brought  forth  immediate  demands  for  similar 
assistance.  Like  the  men  on  the  Holland  Purchase  a  large  pro- 
portion of  the  Pulteney  settlers  had  become  discouraged  by  the 
difficulties  of  raising  their  land  debts.  Many  of  them  had  given 
up  hope  of  ever  completing  their  payments.  Meantime  the 
opening  at  low  prices  of  enormous  tracts  of  low  priced  federal 
lands  in  the  west  had  increased  their  difficulty  of  finding  purchasers 
who  would  buy  their  contracts  or  their  mortgaged  premises. 
Their  natural  conclusion  was  that  the  Pulteney  lands  had  been 
sold  to  them  originally  at  quite  too  high  a  price  and  that  justice 
required  the  agent  to  make  a  reduction  in  their  debts.  The 
assembled  debtors  of  Steuben  County  proposed  that  such  re- 
duction should  be  made  to  the  level  of  wild  land  prices  at  the  time 
without  regard  to  any  improvements  on  the  farms.  The  mere 
presence  of  the  settlers,  they  argued,  had  raised  the  price  of  wild 
lands  far  above  their  value  when  the  Pulteney  Purchase  had  been 
made.  It  was  but  just  therefore  that  the  settler  should  receive 
back  some  of  the  wealth  which  his  labor  had  created.  While  the 
settlers  of  Steuben  County  were  demanding  a  reduction  of  their 
debts,  those  on  the  Pulteney  lands  near  the  lake  were  protesting 


98  PAUL  D.  EVANS 

against  the   practice  of  compounding  interest  and   of  ejecting 
without  compensation  those  settlers  who  had  failed  to  pay. 

Troup's  reply  came  promptly.  He  had  for  some  time  be- 
lieved that  debts  in  Steuben  County  were  generally  too  large  for 
the  ability  of  the  settlers  to  pay  and  he  had  therefore  determined 
to  reduce  them  to  a  reasonable  amount.  He  would  have  made  a 
fair  appraisal  of  the  buildings  and  improvements  on  every  lot 
togethei  with  the  current  value  of  both  cleared  and  wild  land. 
The  real  value  of  each  lot  being  thus  ascertained,  he  proposed  to 
make  an  abatement  on  just  and  equitable  principles  to  reduce  the 
contract  debt  to  a  stim  below  the  appraised  value  whenever  the 
settler  was  ready  to  make  a  moderate  pa3anent  on  the  balance. 
In  addition  a  liberal  extension  of  time  was  to  be  granted  for  the 
payment  of  future  installments. 

Troup's  plan  met  with  little  favor  among  the  debtors  of  Steuben 
County.  They  assembled  in  a  second  convention  and  resolved  to 
withhold  all  further  payments  until  the  agent  should  accede  to 
their  terms.  Troup  however  had  already  made  all  the  concessions 
which  he  felt  were  just.  Defiance  !from  his  settlers  aroused  in 
him  determined  opposition  at  once.  He  pointed  out  to  them  that 
their  scheme  would  lead  to  quite  unfair  discrimination  among  the 
settlers  themselves.  It  could  not  operate  equally  upon  them. 
It  would  often  place  the  settlers  who  had  "profitably  enjoyed 
their  farms"  for  ten,  twenty  or  thirty  years  and  had  paid  little  or 
nothing  upon  them  on  a  footing  of  equality  with  those  who  had 
purchased  their  farms  but  recently,  and  on  a  more  favorable 
footing  than  those  who  had  made  frequent  payments  or  had  quite 
extinguished  their  contract  debts.  Troup  proposed  rather  to  be 
guided  in  his  reductions  by  the  amount  of  the  original  price,  the 
accumvilation  of  interest,  the  actual  value  of  the  property,  the 
enterprise,  industry  and  general  good  conduct  of  the  settler, 
his  ability  to  pay,  his  hardships,  losses  and  misfortunes  since  he 
settled  on  his  lands  and  by  other  circumstances  furnishing  just  and 
equitable  claims  to  liberality.  He  closed  his  manifesto  by  re- 
affirming his  former  instructions  to  his  subagents  and  infoiming  his 
settlers  that  they  could  be  assured  that  the  terms  offered  were 
final.  If  they  persisted  in  withholding  pa>TTients,  he  would, 
though  with  reluctance,  have  recourse  to  the  remedies  which  the 
law  allowed  him. 


THE  PULTENEY  PURCHASE  99 

Troup's  idtimatum  called  forth  bitter  denunciation  from  many 
of  his  settlers.  They  assembled  anew  in  public  meetings  where 
they  drew  up  long  resolutions  censuring  the  cupidity  of  the  English 
proprietors  and  calling  upon  the  legislature  to  support  their 
interests  against  the  foreigners.  The  newspapers  of  the  district 
were  filled  with  acrid  arraignments  of  the  Pulteney  policy  and 
there  were  not  lacking  bold  counsels  of  violence  for  the  protection 
of  the  settlers  rights.  The  more  timid  of  the  debtors  however 
joined  with  the  cooler  heads  in  the  course  of  the  summer  of  1830 
to  make  inquiries  at  the  land  office  regarding  reductions  in  their 
individual  cases.  Many  of  them  found  the  terms  offered  more 
generous  than  they  had  expected.  They  made  what  payments 
they  could  and  took  home  new  contracts  for  their  land.  Their 
example  proved  contagious.  As  the  autumn  wore  on  and  crops 
began  to  be  marketed  more  and  more  came  with  small  payments 
and  went  away  with  modified  contracts.  The  more  stubborn 
still  held  out  and  endeavored  by  new  meetings  again  to  rouse 
public  sentiment  against  the  proprietors.  This  time  however  the 
public  did  not  respond.  The  meetings  were  so  thinly  attended 
that  either  no  action  was  taken  or  no  account  given  out  to  the 
press.  The  leaders  retired  to  their  homes  and  shortly,  concluding 
that  their  cause  was  lost,  most  of  them  followed  their  neighbors  to 
the  land  office  to  obtain  the  proffered  reductions.  By  the  end  of 
the  year  the  movement  was  definitely  ended.  Troup's  triumph 
made  it  certain  that  financially  at  any  rate  success  would  crown  the 
last  years  of  his  agency. 

Troup  remained  in  control  until  his  death  in  1832.  Though  he 
had  not  managed  to  inspire  much  affection  among  his  settlers,  he 
had  at  least  gained  the  respect  of  most  of  them.  He  had  retained 
for  thirty  years  the  confidence  of  his  principals  in  spite  of  the  fact 
that  their  ideas  of  wild  land  management  were  shaped  by  ac- 
quaintance exclusively  with  the  ancient  estates  of  England.  If 
we  consider  the  figures  already  given,  it  seems  probable  that 
Troup's  policy  of  rigid  economy  had  enabled  him  to  forward  to 
England  an  amount  exceeding  considerably  that  originally  ex- 
pended by  Sir  William  Pulteney.  He  had  succeeded  in  his  pur- 
pose: he  had  retrieved  the  principal  and  made  some  retimi  of 
interest  upon  it.  The  collections  which  his  successors  might 
make  could  all  be  counted  as  profits. 


100  PAUL  D.  EVANS 

Unhappily  our  sources  for  the  history  of  the  enterprise  after 
Troup's  death  are  ahnost  entirely  lacking.  Our  story  has  prac- 
tically to  stop  at  that  date.  We  only  know  that  the  opening  of 
the  Erie  railroad  did  for  the  lands  in  Steuben  County  very  much 
what  the  Erie  canal  had  done  for  the  region  further  north.  The 
New  York  City  market  was  made  available  for  the  produce  of  the 
back  country  and  this  meant  prosperity.  It  was  not  long  there- 
after before  a  large  share  of  the  debts  owing  the  Pulteney  heirs 
were  paid.  Many  years  after  the  Civil  War  however  there  still 
remained  som.e  lands  unsold  and  some  ancient  debts  unsettled. 
Indeed  it  was  only  with  the  end  of  the  century  that  at  last  the 
aflairs  of  the  enterprise  were  wound  up. 

When  the  final  accounts  were  cast  up,  it  is  probable  that  they 
showed  but  a  slight  profit.  In  an  attempt  to  estimate  its  amount 
we  must  consider  the  principal  as  remaining  in  the  business  and  all 
of  Troup's  early  returns  simply  as  interest  upon  it.  Interest  at 
5%  on  Pulteney's  share  of  the  original  investment  would  have 
required  a  clear  revenue  each  year  of  about  $56,000.  This  would 
have  totaled  by  1840  two  million  and  a  quarter  dollars.  We 
know  that  at  the  end  of  his  first  twenty  years  of  service  Troup's 
remittances  had  not  yet  wiped  out  the  arrears  of  interest  and  it 
does  not  seem  probable  that  at  any  time  before  1840  the  revenues 
had  overtaken  the  total  of  interest  charges.  If  they  did  so  at  that 
time  there  still  remained  the  principal  to  be  paid  with  interest  as 
long  as  it  was  outstanding.  There  are  no  figures  whatever  avail- 
able to  enlighten  us  on  the  later  course  of  the  agents's  collections. 
We  know  however  that  the  lands  remaining  unsold  were  in  general 
the  poorest  on  the  purchase  and  that  fiom  the  nature  of  things 
diminishing  returns  were  to  be  expected.  Perhaps  not  even 
interest  charges  were  earned;  possibly  much  more  was  forth- 
coming. Some  of  the  later  records  of  the  agency  will  have  to  be 
brought  to  light  before  this  point  can  be  determined. 

There  remains  for  us  the  task  of  passing  judgment  upon  the 
policy  of  the  Pulteney  administration  during  the  period  covered. 
McMaster,  the  most  capable  of  the  early  historians  of  Steuben 
County,  closes  his  consideration  of  the  Pulteney  Estate  with  a 
keen  criticism  of  the  mean  narrow  and  ungenerous  spirit  which 
pervaded  the  policy  of  its  administration  dining  the  first  half  of 
the  nineteenth  century.^^    The  alien  proprietorship,  he  tells  us, 


THE  PULTENEY  PURCHASE  101 

with  its  one  piirpose  of  getting  as  much  money  as  possible  from 
the  settlers  and  its  apparent  utter  unconcern  for  their  interests 
had  been  a  dead,  disheartening  weight  upon  the  county.  That 
a  miiltitude  of  hard-working  men,  having  mired  in  a  slough  of 
interest  and  installment,  had  miserably  failed  in  their  endeavors 
to  gain  themselves  homes  in  the  county  was  a  sufficient  indictment 
of  the  proprietors'  policy.  The  progress  which  the  county  had 
made  was  due  to  the  vigor  of  its  settlers,  their  hard  woik  and 
courage  and  was  in  spite  of  the    incubus    which  rested  upon  it. 

Certainly  there  is  a  measure  of  truth  in  this  arraignment  of  the 
Pulteney  policy,  but  it  seems  to  me  that  the  blame  must  rest  for 
the  most  part  upon  conditions  beyond  the  control  of  the  Pulteney 
heirs  and  upon  Williamson,  that  man  of  all  their  representatives 
in  America  whose  constant  purpose  was  most  directly  opposed  to 
such  a  policy.  The  settler  had  real  reason  to  complain  that  all  the 
money  which  he  paid  into  the  land  office  flowed  out  of  the  country 
at  once,  that  of  the  wealth  which  he  and  his  neighbors  created  in 
their  endeavor  to  pay  off  their  land  debts  none  went  back  again 
to  their  district  to  make  it  more  prosperous  and  happy.  Had 
the  Pulteney  heirs  lived  in  Bath  or  Sodus  and  had  they  reinvested 
there  the  returns  from  their  land  ventures,  adding  thus  to  the 
wealth  of  their  community,  there  would  have  been  much  less 
complaint  of  the  narrow,  mean  and  ungenerous  policy  they  pur- 
sued. Considering  their  experience  with  investments  in  America 
we  cannot  wonder  that  they  preferred  to  reinvest  their  funds  in 
business  enterprises  over  which  they  could  maintain  closer  control.^® 

Nor  must  Troup  be  burdened  with  any  large  share  of  whatever 
criticism  is  due;  rather  it  must  be  shifted  to  the  shoulders  of 
Williamson,  for  it  was  Williamson's  ill  judged  expenditures  which 
entailed  for  Troup  the  most  careful  of  policies.  He  entered  upon 
a  business  whose  assets  fell  far  short  of  the  capital  invested  in  it 
and  he  was  required  not  only  to  keep  it  afloat  but  if  possible  to 
pay  dividends  on  money  which  was  already  lost.  Had  William- 
son's extensive  expenditures  been  better  laid  out,  there  would 
have  been  little  need  for  development  enterprises  under  Troup. 
Or  had  half  the  sums  uselessly  expended  by  Williamson  been 
available  for  Troup  in  the  development  of  his  lands,  there  would 
have  been  little  complaint  of  his  mean  and  narrow  policy.  Troup 
indeed  was  hampered  at  every  turn  by  the  heritage  of  his  prede- 


102  PAUL  D.  EVANS 

cesser;  the  whole  future  of  Pulteney  policy  was  limited  in  a 
manner  that  none  would  have  regretted  more  than  Williamson 
himself.  He  had  been  actuated  by  the  friendliest  of  motives 
toward  his  settlers,  had  believed  their  wellbeing  the  basis  of  all 
prosperity  his  principals  might  enjoy,  and  had  taken  his  measures 
with  the  aim  of  promoting  the  interests  of  both.  In  the  failure  of 
those  measures  both  suffered. 

What  has  just  been  said  will  explain  if  it  does  not  excuse  the 
Pulteney  policy.  The  same  criticisms  which  have  been  advanced 
against  it  exist  in  the  case  of  every  other  large  holder  of  wild  land 
who  attempted  to  apply  ordinary  business  methods  to  his  enter- 
prise. The  hardships  of  the  frontier  and  the  difficulties  which  the 
settlers  had  to  overcome  were  so  great  that  the  vast  majority  of 
them  could  not  meet  promptly  the  obligations  they  assumed. 
Very  few  proprietors  attempted  to  enforce  strictly  those  obligations; 
those  who  did,  even  for  a  short  time,  gained  at  once  a  nam.e  for 
inhtimanity  and  severity  not  easily  lived  down.  Even  those  who 
like  the  Pulteney  proprietors  granted  great  indiilgence  to  their 
settlers  received  back  but  little  love  unless  at  the  same  time  they 
pursued  a  policy  of  extensive  development  of  their  possessions. 
In  general,  when  the  proprietorship  was  absentee  and  this  was 
usually  the  case,  such  a  policy  was  incompatible  with  profits. 
Indeed  here  is  the  crux  of  the  matter:  in  the  great  majority  of 
cases  the  land  business  could  be  made  a  success  only  at  the  ex- 
pense of  a  disgruntled  body  of  settlers;  if  the  settlers  were  to  be 
satisfied,  it  was  fairly  certain  that  no  profits  could  be  had  in  the 
business. 

The  fault  lay  ordinarily  neither  with  the  settlers  nor  the  pro- 
prietors, but  rather  with  the  system.  Perhaps,  as  has  been  some- 
times said,  wild  lands  possessed  no  real  value  whatever  aside  from 
that  given  them  by  settlement  and  development  and,  in  as  much  as 
the  proprietor  sold  the  settler  only  the  opportunity  to  make  wealth 
by  his  own  efforts,  friendly  relations  could  never  exist  between  the 
two  after  the  payment  of  the  debt  was  demanded.  Or  perhaps  we 
get  nearer  the  truth  if  we  regard  the  wild  lands  as  means  for  the 
production  of  wealth  which  the  proprietor  in  his  eagerness  for 
profits  sold  ordinarily  at  too  high  a  rate  to  settlers  who  under- 
estimated the  difficulties  of  production  and  exaggerated  the 
profits  to  be  had.     Whether  we  regard  the  lands  merely  as  oppor- 


THE  PULTENEY  PURCHASE  103 

tunities  or  as  means  of  production,  we  cannot  avoid  the  conclusion 
that  the  State,  as  guardian  of  the  people's  rights,  should  never 
have  made  them  the  object  of  speculation  for  the  more  wealthy; 
it  should  never  have  opened  the  way  for  the  making  of  profits 
at  the  expense  of  the  settlers.  Under  no  circumstances  was  the 
existence  of  the  middleman  or  wholesaler  justified  save  perhaps  in 
the  case  that  it  could  be  gxiaranteed  that  he  would  add  sub- 
stantially to  the  value  of  the  lands  by  a  reasoned  course  of  de- 
velopment, by  supplying  capital  for  the  needs  of  his  settlement. 
No  such  requirement  was  ever  made ;  it  probably  could  never  have 
been  worked  out  in  practice.  We  have  just  seen  how  ineffective 
were  such  efforts  even  in  a  case  where  the  advances  of  capital  were 
most  liberally  and  voluntarily  made.  The  State  in  practice  sold 
at  the  highest  price  it  could  obtain  to  a  man  whose  interest  it  was 
to  make  all  the  profit  he  could  from  his  enterprise.  He  would 
naturally  thereafter  put  not  a  penny  more  into  his  business  than 
seemed  necessary  to  get  the  maximum  returns.  The  State  had 
given  him  carte  blanche  to  resell  at  the  highest  price  he  could  get 
from  settlers  whose  limited  means  had  prevented  their  competing 
with  him  in  the  original  purchase,  and  the  State  threw  around  him 
the  full  protection  of  its  laws  in  the  enforcement  of  his  rights  as 
against  the  settlers.  The  limited  monopoly  which  he  possessed 
led  the  wholesaler  thereafter  to  sell  in  almost  every  case  at  higher 
rates  than  could  be  justified  by  the  results  to  the  settlers.  Better 
far  if  the  State  must  sell  its  lands  to  have  sold  them  directly  to  the 
settlers.  How  much  better  still  had  the  state  and  federal  govern- 
ments pursued  from  the  beginning  the  policy  eventually  adopted 
in  the  Homestead  Acts  of  giving  the  lands  free,  save  for  the  cost 
of  survey,  to  the  men  who  settled  upon  them.  The  public  treasu- 
ries would  to  be  sure  have  been  less  immediate  gainers,  but  the 
wellbeing  of  the  country  would  have  been  greatly  enhanced. 
There  would  have  been  no  Pulteney  Purchase  and  perhaps  the 
proprietors  would  have  regretted  this  no  more  than  the  settlers. 

Paul  D.  Evans 

Bibliographical  Note — Aside  from  the  manuscript  collections  to  which  refer- 
ence has  been  made  the  author  has  found  two  books  of  special  value  in  the 
preparation  of  this  paper: 

Turner,  Orsamus:  History  of  the  Pioneer  Settlement  of  Phelps  and  Gorham's 
Purchase,  and  Morris'  Reserve.  Rochester,  1851.  McMaster,  Guy  H.; 
History  of  the  Settlement  of  Steuben  County,  N.  Y.,  Bath,  1853.    Reprinted  1893. 


104  PAUL  D.  EVANS 


NOTES 


'The  Phelps  and  Gorham  associates  never  secured  any  more  of  the  Genesee. 
The  rise  in  value  of  the  Massachusetts  paper  in  which  it  had  been  agreed 
payments  should  be  made,  together  with  other  causes,  rendered  it  impossible 
for  the  associates  to  fulfill  their  engagements.  In  consequence  an  arrange- 
ment was  made  by  which  they  secured  the  title  to  the  eastern  tract  for  which 
the  Indian  title  had  already  been  quieted.  The  remaining  two  thirds  re- 
verted to  the  State.  It  was  soon  after  sold  to  Robert  Morris,  who  retaining 
temporarily  the  eastern  third  of  his  new  purchase,  sold  the  remainder  to  a 
group  of  Dutch  capitalists  who  came  to  be  known  as  the  Holland  Land  Com- 
pany. The  lands  retained  by  Morris  were  either  sold  soon  after  by  him  or 
were  distributed  among  his  creditors  when  he  became  bankrupt. 

-Robert  Morris  to  W.  and  J.  Willink,  March  16,  1795.  Private  Letter 
Book  I,  p.  82,  Library  of  Congress.  "Captn  Williamson  came  here  a  perfect 
stranger  recommended  to  me,  I  chalked  out  his  Plan  &  the  line  of  march,  he 
has!' succeeded  far  beyond  his  expectations  and  I  glory  in  it, — notwithstanding 
I  sold  the  property  so  cheap  &  knew  at  the  time  of  sale  the  sacrifice  I  was 
making." 

'Williamson  to  Colquhoun  from  Baltimore  soon  after  his  landing  in  1791, 
quoted  by  Turner:  History  of  the  Pioneer  Settlement  of  Phelps  and  Gorham' s 
Purchase,  p.  252. 

^Van  Eeghen  Collection  of  Holland  Land  Company  Papers  (cited  hereafter 
as  HCoP.)  Box  M  No.  8.  This  proposal  is  found  in  a  lengthy  plan  for  the 
management  of  the  lands  of  the  Holland  Purchase.  Williamson  was  a  candi- 
date for  the  agency. 

*See  Turner:  Phelps  and  Gorham' s  Purchase,  pp.  252  ff.,  and  McMaster: 
History  of  the  Settlement  of  Steuben  County,  N.  F.  p.  60  ff. 

*See  especially  Turner,  p.  271. 

^Turner,  p.  263  and  394. 

^Turner,  p.  274. 

^HCoP.  Troup  to  Paul  Busti  quoted  in  Busti  to  P.  and  C.  Van  Eeghen, 
December  19,  1806. 

"For  full  accounts  of  this  episode  see  Turner  and  McMaster. 

"HCoP.  Box  P.  No.  3.     William  Morris's  report  to  Cazenove,  1793. 

i2HCoP.  Box  E.  Cazenove  to  P.  and  C.  Van  Eeghen,  London,  August  23, 
1799. 

'•'Pulteney  died  in  1805  leaving  his  entire  estate  to  his  daughter.  At  her 
death  in  1808  the  American  estate  was  divided,  the  unsold  lands  going  to 
Sir  John  L.  Johnstone  and  the  debts  due  on  sales  to  Mrs.  Mar kham  and  her 
children.     Troup  continued  as  agent  for  the  whole. 

'■•See  files  of  the  Ontario  Messetiger,  1811-15,  in  the  library  of  the  American 
Antiquarian  Society,  Worcester,  Mass. 

i^HCoP.     Busti  to  P.  and  C.  Van  Eeghen,  December  19,  1806. 

i«HCoP.     Box  G.  Troup  to  Busti,  January  14,  1823. 

"These  details  can  be  found  in  the  newspapers  published  at  the  time  on  the 
Pulteney  lands. 

isMcMaster,  p.  157  ff. 

i*This  much  at  any  rate  can  be  said  of  most  of  the  Pulteney  heirs.     It 
true  however  that  Sir  John  Johnstone,  during  the  brief  years  during  which  he 
had  control  over  the  larger  share  of  the  estate,  used  up  the  revenues  at  the 
English  court  as  fast  as  they  came  in. 


SURROGATES'  COURTS  AND  RECORDS  IN  THE 

COLONY  AND  STATE  OF  NEW  YORK, 

1664-1847 

After  the  English  occupation  of  New  Netherland  in  1664,  the 
court  of  burgomasters  and  schepens  of  New  Amsterdam  was 
changed  into  the  mayor's  court.  The  court  of  orphanmasters 
was  discontinued  and  the  mayor's  court  exercised  the  same  juris- 
diction in  respect  to  testamentary  matters  and  estates  of  persons 
dying  intestate  within  the  city  of  New  York  as  the  court  of  orphan- 
masters  had  previously  exercised,  with  some  modifications. 
By  the  Duke's  laws,^  the  proper  officials  were  required  to  search 
for  a  will  and  to  make  an  inventory  of  the  effects  of  the  deceased, 
returnable  to  the  next  court  of  sessions.^  The  probate  of  wills, 
the  granting  of  administrations,  etc.,  took  place  before  the  coiuts 
of  sessions,  except  in  the  city  of  New  York,  where  the  same  jtuis- 
diction  was  exercised  by  the  mayor's  court.  If  the  estate  ex- 
ceeded £100  in  value,  the  proceedings  had  to  be  transmitted  to 
the  office  of  the  secretary  of  the  province  in  the  city  of  New  York, 
where  they  were  recorded  and  the  final  discharge  of  executors  or 
adm.inistrators  was  granted  by  the  governor  under  the  seal  of  the 
province.  In  October,  1665,  an  amendment  to  the  Duke's  laws 
provided : 

^"That  all  Oiiginall  Wills  after  haveing  beene  prooved  att  the 
Court  of  Assizes  or  Sessions  and  returned  into  the  Office  of  Records 
att  New-Yorke  shall  remaine  there,  and  the  Executors  Adminis- 
trators shall  leceive  a  Coppie  theieof,  with  a  Certificate  of  it 
being  allowed  and  attested  under  the  Seal  of  the  Office." 

The  Duke's  laws  distinctly  specify  the  court  of  sessions  as  the 
court  of  probate;  nevertheless,  on  more  than  one  occasion  probate 
matters  appear  in  the  minutes  of  the  court  of  assizes,  the  highest 
court  in  the  province.  This  procedure  continued  until  1686 
and  was  changed  by  royal  instructions  to  governor  Dongan. 
These  instructions  placed  the  ecclesiastical  affairs  of  the  province 
under  the  jusridiction  of  the  archbishop  of  Canterbury,  but  ex- 
cepted certain  of  the  bishop's  prerogatives,  among  them^  "grant- 
ing Probat  of  Wills,  which  wee  have  reserved  to  you  our  Gov''." 

105 


106  ROY  DEN  WOODWARD  VOSBURGH 

In  England  probate  jurisdiction  was  vested  in  the  ecclesiastical 
court  of  the  archbishop  of  Canterbury.  The  same  exception  as  to 
the  probate  of  wills  was  retained  in  the  instructions  to  governor 
Sloughter  (1691),  governor  Fletcher  (1692)  and  subsequent 
colonial  governors. 

After  the  instructions  to  Dongan  were  received  a  change  took 
place.  The  courts  of  sessions  and  the  mayor's  court  continued  to 
exercise  their  functions,  but  the  governor  or  the  secretary  of  the 
province  also  took  proof  of  wills.  In  1691,  under  the  adminis- 
tration of  lieutenant-governor  Ingoldsby,  a  clause  was  inserted  in 
all  letters  testamentary  and  like  proceedings,  that  the  judicial 
powers  belonged  to  the  governor  and  not  to  any  inferior  judge. 
If  a  will  was  proved  before  the  secretary,  he  annexed  a  certificate 
"that  being  thereunto  delegated"  in  the  name  of  the  governor, 
etc.,  that  the  will  had  been  "proved,  approved  and  allowed"  under 
the  prerogative  seaP.  Governor  Sloughter  died  on  July  23,  1691 
and  on  August  15,  1691,  letters  of  administration  were  issued  to  his 
widow  in  the  name  of  major  Richard  Ingoldsby,  commander-in- 
chief,  sealed  with  the  seal  of  the  prerogative  office^  and  signed  by 
Matthew  Clarkson,  secretary.  The  office  of  records  was  in  charge 
of  the  secretary  of  the  province,  or  the  governor's  secretary  as  he 
was  sometimes  designated.  A  distinct  department,  as  has  been 
shown,  grew  up  in  the  secretary's  office  which  took  the  name  of  the 
prerogative  office  and  the  records  connected  with  it  the  name  of  the 
registry  of  the  prerogative  and  the  whole  became  distinguished 
by  the  judicial  appellation  of  the  prerogative  court'. 

The  court  of  common  pleas^  was  established  in  each  city  and 
county  in  the  province,  on  May  6,  1691;  and  on  May  15,  1691 
colonel  William  Smith  of  Brookhaven  was  appointed  judge  of  the 
prerogative  court  within  Suffolk  county.^  The  book^"  containing 
the  records  of  letters  of  administration,  wills,  inventories,  etc., 
for  Albany  county  was  commenced  on  October  6,  1691.  Under 
date  April  20,  1693,  Matthew  Clarkson,  secretary  of  the  province, 
described  the  prerogative  court  as  follows:"  "The  Governour 
discharges  the  place  of  Ordinary  (bishop)  in  granting  adminis- 
tracons  and  proveing  Wills  &  The  Secretary  is  Register."  By  a 
law^2  passed  November  11,  1692,  the  right  to  admit  wills  to  probate 
and  to  grant  letters  of  administration  was  vested  in  the  governor 
"or  Such  Person  as  he  shall  Delegate  under  the  seal  of  the  Pre- 


SURROGATES'   COURTS  AND  RECORDS  107 

rogative  Office."  The  estates  of  persons  deceased  within  (New 
York),  Orange,  Richmond,  Westchester  and  Kings  counties  were 
to  be  settled  at  New  York,  before  the  governor  or  his  delegate. 
And  those  in  the  more  remote  counties  were  heard  before  the 
county  cotirt  of  common  pleas  and  the  papers  were  forwarded  to  the 
secretary's  office  at  New  York  where  the  probate  was  granted.^' 
However,  if  the  estate  was  not  over  £50  in  value,  the  judges  in  the 
"more  remote  counties"  were  authorized  to  grant  probates  or 
letters  of  administration;  within  three  months  after  granting 
thereof,  an  appeal  could  be  taken  to  the  prerogative  office.  In 
1750,  the  probate  law  was  amended^*  by  granting  to  the  Orange 
coimty  cotut  the  same  powers  exercised  by  the  courts  in  the 
"more  remote  counties;"  in  1772,  this  privilege  was  extended  to 
certain  newly  formed  and  very  distant  counties.  ^^ 

During  the  colonial  period,  the  secretary  of  the  province  or  his 
deputy  was  almost  always  appointed  principal  surrogate  or  deputy 
judge  of  the  prerogative  court. ^^  Besides,  siirrogates  were  fre- 
quently appointed  to  act  in  the  "more  remote  counties.  ""^^  Under 
the  constitution  of  1777,  the  power  of  appointing  sturogates  lay 
in  the  coimcil  of  appointment,  although  the  governor  of  the  state 
exercised  the  right  of  originating  the  nomination. ^^  In  1778,  the 
legislature  abolished  the  prerogative  court^^  and  established  the 
court  of  probates,^"  with  a  single  judge,  who  was  vested  with  the 
powers  formerly  held  by  the  provincial  governor  in  testamentary 
matters,  except  the  power  of  appointing  surrogates.  Between 
1777  and  1787,  at  least  a  part  of  the  time,  there  were  surrogates  in 
office  in  the  counties  of  Albany,  Columbia,  Cumberland,  Dutchess, 
Montgomery  (Tryon),  Orange,  Queens,  Suffolk,  Ulster,  Washing- 
ton (Charlotte)  and  Westchester. ^^  They  were  appointed  for  an 
unlimited  period  and  could  be  removed  for  cause. 

From  September  15,  1776  to  November  25,  1783,  southern 
Westchester  county.  New  York  and  Richmond  counties  and  Long 
Island  were  occupied  by  English  troops  and  were  under 
British  jurisdiction.  The  colonial  prerogative  court  con- 
tinued to  exercise  its  powers  in  this  southern  district,  Cary 
Ludlow  being  the  surrogate. ^^  The  records  for  this  period  may 
be  classed  in  three  groups: 

(1)  The  records  of  the  prerogative  court  for  the  revolutionary 
period^^  kept  in  the  secretary's  office  in  New  York  City. 


108  ROYDEN  WOODWARD  VOSBURGH 

(2)  The  ante-revolutionary  records  of  the  prerogative  court  in 
the  possession  of  the  Americans  after  February  1776  and  moved 
from  place  to  place  in  the  Hudson  river  valley^*  until  1782,  when 
the  secretary  of  the  state  was  authorized  by  law^^  to  deliver  them 
to  the  judge  of  the  court  of  probates. 

(3)  The  records  of  the  court  of  probates^^  kept  in  various  places 
in  Dutchess  county  wherever  the  court  was  in  session. 

All  these  records  were  united  when  the  court  of  probates  con- 
vened in  New  York  city,  in  December,  1783,  after  the  British 
evacuation.  In  1784,  a  law^''  was  passed  to  legalize  the  proceedings 
taken  in  the  southern  district  of  the  state,  while  the  British  were  in 
control.  In  1786,  a  law^^  was  passed  amplifying  the  procedure  to 
be  followed  in  proving  wills,  which  specifically  provided  that 
notice  should  be  given  to  the  heirs  before  offering  a  will  for  probate. 

On  May  1,  1787,  a  law^^  took  effect  which  is  the  foundation  of  the 
present  jurisdiction  of  surrogates  courts  and  records  in  this  State. 
It  established  siirrogates  courts  in  each  county  and  directed  the 
surrogates  to  keep  records  "as  the  like  records  in  the  office  of  the 
judge  of  the  court  of  probates."  The  surrogate  held  jurisdiction 
only  over  estates  of  persons  who  had  owned  property  and  died 
within  their  counties;  other  estates  were  adjudicated  before  the 
court  of  probates,  which  had  appellative  jurisdiction  over  the 
surrogates  courts.  Under  this  law  surrogates  were  appointed  and 
commenced  surrogates  records  in  the  several  counties  of  the  State 
then  organized;  the  first  judge  of  the  county  acted  as  surrogate 
unless  another  person  was  appointed. 

In  1797,  a  law^°  was  passed  to  provide  for  the  erection  of  a  public 
building  at  Albany,  to  contain  the  records  of  the  secretary  of  state, 
the  supreme  court  and  the  court  of  probates.  It  directed  that 
after  June  1,  1798,  the  office  and  records  of  the  court  of  probates 
were  to  be  in  Albany  and  that  the  judge  and  clerk  of  the  court 
should  reside  there.  But  the  building  was  not  completed  in  time 
and  the  removal  of  the  various  offices  from  New  York  city,  which 
were  to  occupy  it,  was  accordingly  delayed  until  the  spring  of 
1799.3^  There  seems  little  doubt  but  that  the  records  of  the 
court  of  probates  were  kept  with  the  records  in  the  custody  of  the 
secretary  of  state;  in  fact  the  bound  volumes  of  Wills  &  Probates 
Nos.  1  and  2  are  still  labeled  on  the  back  at  the  bottom  "SECRE- 
TARY'S OFFICE,"  in  style  similar  to  the  books  inthe  secretary  's 


SURROGATES'  COURTS  AND  RECORDS  109 

office  which  were  rebound  about  1820.  The  date  of  the  first 
session  of  the  court  of  probates  in  Albany,  June  13,  1799,  corre- 
sponds very  closely  with  the  date  of  the  bill  rendered  for  the  re- 
moval of  the  secretary's  office  from  New  York,  June  27,  1799. 

While  the  records  in  the  secretary's  office  were  still  in  New  York, 
a  law^2  -y^as  passed  March  30,  1799,  which  directed  that  all  the 
records  of  the  court  of  probates  prior  to  May  1,  1787  (including 
those  of  the  prerogative  court)  should  be  delivered  to  the  surrogate 
of  New  York  county;  as  well  as  all  the  original  wills  of  persons 
who  had  been  residents  of  the  southern  district  of  the  state.^' 
The  preponderance  of  evidence  seems  to  indicate  that  the  law 
was  not  complied  with,  but  that  the  records  of  the  court  of  pro- 
bates were  moved  to  Albany  with  the  secretary's  office.  On 
March  31,  1802,  a  law^^  was  enacted  to  defray  the  expense  of 
moving  back  to  New  York  city  such  records  as  had  been  designated 
by  the  law  of  March  30,  1799.  Pursuant  to  the  later  law,  Peter 
Beeckman  clerk  of  the  court  of  probates  and  Silvanus  Miller 
surrogate  of  New  York  county,  rendered  bills,^^  dated  respectively 
July  3d  and  August  27th  1802,  to  cover  the  expense  of  the  return 
of  the  records  and  documents  to  New  York.  But  when  the 
documents  and  papers  were  sorted,  the  original  wills,  inventories 
and  miscellaneous  papers  were  not  carefully  collated  and  there  are 
to  this  day  in  Albany,  many  papers  belonging  to  the  southern 
district;  and  in  New  York  city,  some  papers  belonging  to  the 
other  districts. 

The  revised  acts^^  of  1801  re-enacted  with  practically  no 
change,  the  surrogates  law  which  took  effect  May  1,  1787.  The 
revised  laws*^  of  1813  made  no  particular  changes  in  the  procedure 
affecting  surrogates  records.  By  a  law^^  passed  in  1823,  juris- 
diction in  all  estates  was  transferred  to  the  surrogates,  the  court  of 
probates  was  abolished  and  its  records  were  deposited  in  the  office 
of  the  secretary  of  state;  the  appellative  jurisdiction  of  the  court 
was  vested  in  the  court  of  chancery.  Surrogates  were  appointed 
as  prescribed  by  the  constitution  of  1821.  In  1829,  the  records 
of  the  court  of  probates  were  transferred  ^^  to  the  office  of  the 
register  in  chancery.  The  judiciary  acf*°  of  1847  passed  to  comply 
with  the  new  constitution,  abolished  the  court  of  chancery  and 
directed  that  the  records  in  the  said  court  be  deposited  with  the 
clerk  of  the  court  of  appeals.     The  new  supreme  court  held  the 


1 10  ROYDEN  WOODWARD  VOSB URGH 

appellative  jurisdiction  over  the  surrogates  formerly  vested  in  the 
court  of  chancery. 

Certain  sections^^  of  the  revised  statutes  of  1829,  which  took 
effect  January  1,  1830,  specified  more  fully  the  nature  of  the  records 
to  be  kept  in  the  offices  of  the  surrogates;  and  provided  that  all 
"affidavits,  petitions,"  etc.,  should  be  kept  on  file.  This  act  made 
it  comptilsory  for  petitions  for  granting  letters  testamentary  and 
of  administration  to  be  permanently  kept  on  file.  The  consti- 
tution of  1846  materially  changed  the  judicial  system  in  the  State; 
it  abolished  certain  courts  and  created  new  ones;  it  made  the 
judiciary  offices  of  the  State  elective  by  the  people,  instead  of 
appointable  by  the  governor.  It  provided  that  in  counties  having 
a  population  of  over  forty  thousand,  the  legislature  may  pass  laws 
for  the  election  of  surrogates.'*-  Otherwise,  the  county  judge 
performs  the  duties  of  the  surrogate.  In  1847,  the  judiciary  act 
and  other  laws'*^  were  passed  to  comply  with  the  provisions  of  the 
new  constitution.  The  new  laws  went  into  effect  on  the  first 
Monday  in  July,  1847. 

It  should  be  noted  that  this  article  covers  only  practice  and 
records  relating  to  the  English  system  of  jurisprudence.  The 
Dutch  practice  (a  survival  from  Roman  law)  followed  the  notarial 
system  where  the  original  wills  were  entered  by  notaries  in  their 
notarial  records  and  signed  by  the  testators.  During  the  Dutch 
administration  of  New  Netherland,  records^  were  kept  by  the 
notaries  Salomon  La  Chair  and  Walewyn  van  der  Veen,  in  New 
York  city.  In  Albany  the  notarial  records  continued  and  the 
Dutch  system  prevailed  for  a  nimiber  of  years  after  the  English 
government  of  the  colony  had  been  established.^^  Three  notarial 
records^®  have  been  preserved  in  Albany :— those  of  Dirck  van 
Schelluyne  (1660-1664),  Adriaen  van  Ilpendam  (1667-1686), 
and  Jan  Becker  (1685-1690).  Testamentary  dispositions  of 
property  made  before  the  schout  or  the  secretary  (after  the  manner 
of  the  notarial  system)  appear  in  the  Dutch  records  at  Kingston,*'' 
from  1663  to  1684;  besides  which,  there  are  recorded  in  the  Ulster 
county  clerk's  office  from  1685  to  1789,  many  wills  which  were 
proved  before  the  court  of  sessions  or  the  court  of  common  pleas. 

RoYDEN  Woodward  Vosburgh 


SURROGATES'  COURTS  AND  RECORDS  111 


References  and  Annotations 

'The  Duke's  laws,  published  March  1,  1665,  at  a  general  meeting  at  Hemp- 
stead. Collections  of  N.  Y.  Hist.  Society,  Vol.  I  (1809);  310,  404,  412,  415. 
Also,  Colonial  Laws  of  N.  Y.  (1894),  I:  62.  Calendar  of  Wills  (Fernow,1896), 
vi,  vii. 

^When  the  Duke's  laws  were  promulgated  they  appear  to  have  applied  to 
Yorkshire  (Long  Island)  only.  But  after  the  second  occupation  by  the 
English,  in  1674,  the  jurisdiction  of  the  Duke's  laws  extended  over  the  entire 
province;  Docs.  Col.  Hist,  of  N.  F.,III:  226.  There  were  six  courts  of  sessions, 
one  in  each  precinct,  division  or  riding,  viz: — the  North,  East  and  West 
Ridings  of  Long  Island,  and  the  towns  of  New  York,  Albany  and  Esopus; 
Docs.  Col.  Hist,  oj  N.  Y.,  Ill:  260-1,  §  §  1,  4,  10  and  12. 

^Colonial  Laws  of  N.  Y.,  I:  75.  Amendments  confirmed  at  general  assizes, 
Sept.  28  to  Oct.  4,  1665,  Administration,  last  clause. 

^Docs.  Col.  Hist,  of  N.  Y.,  Ill:  372,  §35. 

Tor  engraving  of  the  seal  of  the  prerogative  court,  see  Civil  List  and  Con- 
stitutional History  of  Colony  and  State  of  Nezu  York,  opposite  p.  282. 

«iV.  Y.  county  wills,  liber  4:  105.  Also,  Coll.  of  N.  Y.  Hist.  Society  (1892) 
XXV:  189. 

'The  opening  paragraphs  of  this  article  were  taken  principally  from  The 
Nature,  Extent  and  History  of  the  Jurisdiction  of  the  Surrogates  Courts  of  the 
State  of  New-York.  Opinion  of  Judge  Charles  P.  Daly,  in  the  matter  of  the 
Estate  of  Joseph  W.  Brick,  delivered  in  the  Surrogates  Court,  N.  Y.  County,  on 
November  26,  1862.     Published  in  1863;  see  ihid.,  p.  13. 

^Colonial  Laws  of  N.Y.,  I:  226.  Chap.  IV,  Laws  of  the  first  Assembly,  enti- 
tled "An  Act  for  the  Establishing  Courts  of  Judicature  for  the  Ease  and  bene- 
fitt  of  each  respective  Citty  Town  and  County  within  this  Province,"  passed 
May  6,  1691. 

^Calendar  of  Council  Minutes,  page  65.  On  the  same  day  colonel  Smith  was 
also  appointed  a  justice  of  the  supreme  court  :  Council  Minutes,  6:  26.  The 
record  of  wills  admitted  to  probate  before  the  prerogative  court  of  Suffolk 
county,  1691-1703,  was  published  in  1897,  under  the  title  Early  Long  Island 
Wills  of  Suffolk  County. 

"Albany  county  clerk's  office,  Wills,  Part  i  &  2,  i6gi-i8js.  See  New 
York  State  Library,  History  Bulletin  11,  pp.  4,  117. 

^Wocs.  Col.  Hist,  of  N.  Y.,  IV:  28.  "An  Account  of  all  Establishmts  of 
Jurisdictions  within  this  Province." 

^Colonial  Laws  of  N.  Y.,  I:  300-302.     Chap.  27. 

"A  wiU  was  proved  when  the  testimony  of  the  witnesses  was  heard  in  the 
court  of  proper  jurisdiction,  as  to  its  execution  by  the  deceased.  The  validity 
and  sufficiency  of  the  will  was  determined  by  the  prerogative  court,  after  which 
it  was  probated  and  recorded. 

^^Colonial  Laws  of  N.  Y.,  Ill:  780.     Chap.  894,  passed  Nov.  24,  1750. 

^^Colonial  Laws  of  N.  Y.,  V:  414.  Chap.  1563,  passed  Mar.  24,  1772,  ex- 
tended the  privilege  granted  to  the  more  remote  counties,  to  Tryon,  Char- 
lotte, Cumberland  and  Gloucester  counties,  which  were  formed  shortly  be- 
fore. 

'^Docs.  Col.  Hist,  of  N.  Y.,  VII:  830;  VIII:  187,  188,  283,  322-27,  413- 
415,  445. 

"Civil  List  Colony  and  State  of  N.  Y.,  450-457. 

i^Art.  XXVII,  of  the  first  constitution  of  the  State,  adopted  Apr.  20,  1777, 
recognized  the  court  of  probates  to  the  extent  of  providing  that  the  clerk  of  the 
court  should  be  appointed  by  the  judge  of  the  said  court. 

i^Abolishing  the  prerogative  court  made  legislation  necessary  to  legalize 
proceedings  taken  during  the  British  occupation  of  the  southern  district  of 
New  York;  see  note  27. 
^°Session  Laws,  I:  22.     First  Session,  Chap.  12,  passed  Mar.  16,  1778. 


112  ROY  DEN  WOODWARD  VOSBURGH 

^^Civil  List  Colony  and  State  of  N.  Y.,  450-457. 

22Cary  Ludlow  first  appears  as  deputy  surrogate  on  Apr.  19,  1774;  N,  Y. 
county  wills,  29:  82.  Sometimes  he  placed  the  initials  "D.  S.  P."  after  his 
name  when  certifying  that  a  will  was  probated.  He  used  the  title  "Surrogate" 
for  the  first  time  on  Aug.  3,  1774;  ibid.,  29:  126.  Gary  Ludlow  continued  to 
hold  office  during  the  period  of  British  occupancy  of  New  York  city.  When 
the  seal  of  the  prerogative  court  was  affixed  at  the  time  the  will  was  registered, 
he  was  at  first  styled  "Surrogate  of  the  Province  of  New  York;"  after  Jan. 
30,  1778,  his  title  was  more  often  given  "Surrogate  for  the  City  and  County 
of  New  York;"  and  during  the  fall  of  1783,  sometimes  "Surrogate 
of  the  City  and  Province  of  New  York."  After  the  deputy  secretary,  Samuel 
Bayard,  Jr.,  was  captured  by  the  Provincials  with  the  public  records,  on  Feb., 
11,  1776,  John  Moore  was  appointed  to  his  office;  Cal.  of  N.  Y.  Hist.  MSS 
Rev.  Papers,  I:  555.  Moore's  commission  was  dated  Nov.  23,  1776;  a  mem- 
orandum concerning  it  appears  in  N.  Y.  county  wills,  31:  1.  John  Moore 
held  the  ofiice  of  deputy  secretary  and  register  of  the  prerogative  court  until 
about  June  3,  1779.  On  June  15,  1779,  Samuel  Bayard,  jr.,  resumed  the 
ofifices;  N.  Y.  county  ivills,  32:  102. 

23iV.  Y.  comity  wills,  fibers  31,  32,  34  and  35;  see  note  26. 
^^Conceming  the  records  of  the  court,  judge  Daly  says: 

"The  records  belonging  to  it,  and  everything  appertaining  to  wills  and 
the  administration  of  estates,  were  carried  to  Albany  during  the  Revolu- 
tion, before  the  evacuation  of  the  city  [of  New  York]  by  the  American 
troops.  An  Act  was  passed  in  1799  (2  Greenleaf,  Laws  of  N.  Y.,  420) 
directing  the  Judge  of  the  Court  of  Probate  to  deliver  to  the  Svu-rogate 
of  the  City  and  County  of  New-York  all  books,  records,  minutes,  docu- 
ments and  papers  belonging  to  the  Court  of  Probate  before  1st  of  May, 
1787,  in  pursuance  of  which  the  late  Sylvanus  Miller  who  was  then  Surro- 
gate, went  to  Albany  in  1800,  and  brought  away  every  thing  that  could  be 
found.  ***** 

The  Nature,  Extent  and  History  oj  the  Jurisdiction  of  the  Surrogates 
Courts  of  the  State  of  New  York,  etc.,  footnote,  p.  19. 

Judge  Daly's  remarks  will  not  stand  comparison  with  the  documentary 
evidence,  which  is  cited  at  length,  herewith.  To  begin  with,  there  were  two 
governments  in  New  York  State  during  the  revolution: — the  State  govern- 
ment and  the  Colonial  government.  New  York  City  was  in  the  hands  of  the 
British  from  Sept.  15,  1776  to  Nov.  25,  1783,  during  which  time  the  registry 
of  deeds  and  the  prerogative  court  in  New  York  City  were  functioning  as 
parts  of  the  colonial  government.  On  December  9,  1775,  when  the  pubhc 
records  in  the  secretary's  office  were  in  danger  of  being  seized  by  some  Con- 
necticut raiders,  the  more  important  records  such  as  related  to  the  immediate 
interests  of  the  Crown  were  removed  on  board  the  British  ship  Dutchess  of 
Gordon;  they  remained  afloat  in  the  harbor  for  six  years,  being  transferred 
from  ship  to  ship.  See  Docs.  Col.  Hist.  N.  Y.,  VIII:  760-1  and  Cal.  of 
Council  Minutes,  p.  506.  On  about  November  1,  1781,  they  were  returned  to 
Samuel  Bayard,  jr.,  and  remained  in  the  secretary's  office  until  they  were 
turned  over  to  the  state  authorities.  The  records  of  the  prerogative  court  for 
the  revolutionary  period  (while  under  British  control)  occupy  libers  31,  32, 
34  and  35  of  New  York  county  wills.  They  commence  with  a  notice  of  the 
appointment  of  John  Moore  as  deputy  secretary,  under  date  November  23, 
1776.  He  was  appointed  because  Samuel  Bayard  was  a  state  prisoner  at 
Kingston,  with  the  public  records  then  in  the  possession  of  the  Provincials, 
which  will  be  discussed  later.  In  August  1778,  Mr.  Bayard  appears  to  have 
been  granted  permission  to  return  to  New  York  City.  See  Clinton  Papers, 
III:  611,  657.  On  June  15,  1779,  he  resumed  his  office  in  New  York  City  as 
deputy  secretary  and  register  of  the  prerogative  court;  N.  Y.  county  wills, 
32:  102. 


SURROGATES'  COURTS  AND  RECORDS  113 

At  a  meeting  of  the  council  held  on  April  10,  1783,  the  deputy  secretary, 
Sam'l  Bayard,  Jr.,  rendered  an  account  of  the  public  records  now  in  his  cus- 
tody. He  reported  to  governor  Robertson  that  "on  or  about  the  first  day 
of  November,  1781,"  he  had  received  three  cases  containing  all  the  books 
which  had  been  put  on  board  the  Dutchess  of  Gordon,  except  the  records  of 
Indian  cessions;  and  further  that  these  records  were  mildewed  and  in  bad 
condition.  At  a  meeting  of  the  council  held  on  May  26,  1783,  Andrew  Elliot, 
the  lieutenant-governor,  reported  that  under  date  May  15th,  John  Morin 
Scott  had  made  a  demand  for  the  "records  of  this  state."  The  council  at 
large  refused  to  surrender  the  records.  See  Calendar  of  Council  Minutes, 
pp.  507-8.  These  proceedings  were  entered  in  Council  Minutes,  26:  469- 
473.  For  extracts  from  these  pages  see  Report  oj  the  Secretary  of  State  relative 
to  the  Records,  &fc  in  his  office.  Appendix,  Note  D,  pp.  36-37.  Printed  as 
Senate  Document  No.  2,  January  5,  1820.  Also,  see  Annalium  Thesaurus,  a 
boimd  MSS  folio  volume  in  the  office  of  the  secretary  of  state,  by  J.  V.  N. 
Yates,  then  the  secretary.  On  November  21,  1783,  Samuel  Bayard,  jr., 
delivered  to  the  deputy  secretar\^  of  state  all  the  pubHc  records  that  had  been 
in  possession  of  the  British  in  New  York  City.  A  copy  of  the  receipt  given 
is  among  the  papers  of  the  New  York  Historical  Society,  it  having  been  ob- 
tained from  London,  in  1903.     Extracts  from  the  receipt  follow: 

Transcript  of  a  paper  preserved  amongst  the  American  MSS.  in  the 

Royal  Institution,  London,  Vol.  46,  No.  29.     A  duplicate  is  preserved 

in  the  Public  Record  Office. 

I  Book  containing  Records  of  Commissions,  Deeds  and  Wills  com- 
mencing 23d  November  1776. 

3  Books  in  folio  of  Records  of  Wills  from  15th  August,  1778  to  19th 
November,  1783. 

7  Unbound  Books  containing  Records  of  Administration  on  intestate 
Estates  commencing  24  November,  1776  and  ending  7th  November,  1783. 

3  Files  of  Fiats  for  Administration,  Administration  Bonds,  Citations 
and  other  Papers  relative  to  the  Prerogative  Court. 

II  Files  containing  709  Original  Wills  as  follows: — 
[Names  of  testators  given  in  full] 

City  of  New  York,  2lst.  November,  1783. 

I  do  hereby  Certify  that  the  preceding  list  Contained  upon  20  Pages 
hereunto  annexed,  is  a  Just  and  true  Account  of  All  Public  Records  and 
Original  WiUs  in  my  Possession  as  Secretary  of  the  Colony  of  New  York. 

Sam  Bayard  Junr. 

By  Virtue  of  a  Deputation  from  John  Morin  Scott,  Esquire,  Secretary 
of  the  State  of  New  York,  I  do  hereby  Acknowledge  to  have  Received  of 
Mr.  Samuel  Bayard,  Secr'y  of  the  late  Colony  of  New  York,  the  Records 
and  Original  Wills  as  mentioned  and  particularly  specified  in  the  pre- 
ceding Certificate  and  list.  In  Witness  whereof  I  have  Signed  and 
Sealed  four  Seperate  receipts  for  the  same,  at  Newyork,  this  Twenty 
first  day  of  Nov'r  in  the  year  of  Our  Lord  one  thousand  Seven  hundred 
and  eighty  three. 

Sealed  and  Delivered  Lewis  A.  Scott,  Dep'y  Secr'y 

in  the  presence  of  of  the  State  of  New  York 

Wm.  Kirby 
James  Roosevelt 

The  other  public  records  of  the  colony  were  under  the  jurisdiction  of  the 
Provincial  Congress  of  New  York,  after  February  11,  1776.  The  pubHc 
records  (including  the  prerogative  records)  were  at  the  house  of  Mr.  Nicholas 
Bayard,  alderman,  from  Feb.  11,  1776,  until  the  last  of  June,  1776.  See 
Correspondence  oj  Prov.  Cong,  of  N.  Y.,  II:  322.     For  other  references  to  the 


114  ROYDEN  WOODWARD  VOSBURGH 

records,  see  Journal  of  the  Prov.  Cong,  of  N.  Y.,  I:  135,  138,  140,  285,  291, 
296,  339,  396,  402,  675,  692.  Also,  Docs.  Col.  Hist,  of  N.  Y.,  XV:  55,  78,  80, 
92,  93;  and  Clinton  Papers,  I:  10. 

June  14,  1776.  Order  issued  directing  removal  of  the  records,  by  water,  to 
Kingston;  Samuel  Bayard,  the  deputy  secretary,  to  accompany  them;  Journal 
of  the  Prov.  Cong,  of  N.  Y.,  I:  494. 

Apr.  28,  1777.  Resolved  that  200  men  be  raised  to  guard  the  public  records 
and  treasury  of  this  State;  ibid.,  I:  904. 

Oct.  10,  1777.  All  public  records  to  be  put  in  chests  and  conveyed  [from 
Kingston]  to  Rochester;  Samuel  Bayard  to  accompany  the  records;  ibid. 
I:  1066. 

Nov.  7,  1777.  Records  at  Wawarsing.  Letter  to  John  Barclay,  chairman 
of  the  Albany  committee  of  correspondence,  suggesting  that  to  avoid  the 
expense  of  the  guard,  the  records  be  removed  to  Albany ;  Mr.  Bayard  to 
accompanj'^  the  records  and  to  have  lodgings  in  the  building  where  they  are 
housed;  ibid.,  I:  1077. 

Nov.  12,  1777.  Answer  from  Albany  committee,  that  Mr.  Abraham  Dow 
is  willing  to  spare  a  room  in  the  lower  story  in  his  house  for  the  records ;  and 
at  the  same  time  to  furnish  boarding  for  Mr.  Bayard.  The  committee  at 
Albany  also  request  the  council  to  remove  to  Albany  the  records  of  the  city 
and  county  of  Albany;  ibid.,  I:  1083. 

There  seems  little  doubt  but  that  the  records  of  the  prerogative  court 
(prior  to  1776)  were  among  the  public  records  just  mentioned,  because  a  law 
was  passed  in  1782,  which  authorized  the  secretary  of  state  to  deliver  them 
to  the  judge  of  the  cotirt  of  probates;  see  note  25. 

Thomas  Tredwell  was  appointed  judge  of  the  court  of  probates  on  Mar.  13, 
1778.  The  data  which  follow  concerning  the  sessions  of  the  court  of  probates 
have  been  abstracted  directly  from  the  original  records  of  wills  in  the  surrogate's 
office  in  New  York  City  and  in  the  office  of  the  clerk  of  the  court  of  appeals  in 
Albany  and  from  judge  Tredwell's  memorandum  book  1782-4  now  in  the  Long 
Island  Historical  Society  Library.  The  dates  of  the  sessions  of  the  covu-t  liave 
been  determined  by  the  dates  the  wills  were  probated  and  recorded  and  the  ex- 
ecutors qualified,  which  dates  are  nearly  always  in  chronological  order.  The  first 
recorded  session  of  the  court  was  on  May  20,  1778,  when  the  will  of  Abraham 
Purdy  was  proved  at  Poughkeepsie.  The  executors  qualified  and  the  will 
was  probated  and  registered  under  the  seal  of  the  court  of  probates,  on  May 
29,  1778;  N.  Y.  county  wills,  33:  1-2.  The  court  continued  to  sit  at  Pough- 
keepsie until  March  2,  1779;  ibid.,  33:  84,  85.  On  May  13,  1779,  sessions 
began  at  Amenia,  ibid.,  33:  87,  which  continued  until  Oct.  4,  1781,  ibid.,  33: 
249,  with  a  few  sessions  at  Poughkeepsie  during  that  time.  Court  was  held 
at  Poughkeepsie,  Oct.  9  to  23,  1781;  ibid.,  33:  252,  253,  269.  Then  it  re- 
moved to  Rumbout  precinct,  a  few  miles  south  of  Poughkeepsie,  where  it 
remained  nearly  all  of  the  time,  from  Dec.  3,  1781,  ihid.,  33:  270,  255,  256, 
to  Nov.  22,  1783.  During  this  period  sessions  were  held  at  Poughkeepsie, 
Feb.  12  to  Apr.  13,  1782;  and  at  Kingston,  Jan.  29  to  Feb.  7,  1783  and  Mar. 
24  to  28,  1783.  Besides,  judge  Tredwell  went  over  to  Charlotte  (now  Clinton) 
and  held  court  to  prove,  probate  and  register  two  wills,  on  the  morning  of 
June  28,  1782.  The  name  of  Joseph  Hazard,  clerk  of  the  court,  first  appears 
on  Oct.  5,  1779.  Most  of  the  wills  registered  prior  to  that  date  bear  the  no- 
tation: "A  true  copy  examined  in  the  absence  of  the  Clerk,  by  me,  Thomas 
Tredwell,  Judge."  Hazard  continued  to  serve  as  clerk  until  Dec.  13,  1782. 
David  Judson  succeeded  him  Dec.  21,  1782. 

The  first  recorded  session  of  the  court  of  probates  in  New  York  City,  after 
the  British  evacuation,  began  on  Dec.  2,  1783;  N.  Y.  cotinty  wills,  36:  147. 
The  last  proceedings  of  the  coiu-t,  which  are  recorded  in  the  sturogate's  office 
of  New  York  county  were  on  Jan.  25,  1787;  ibid.,  39:  437.  The  proceedings 
from  Jan.  26,  1787  to  Apr.  30,1787  are  in  the  records  of  the  court  of  probates 
now  in  Albany,  notwithstanding  the  law  passed   Mar.   30,   1799;   Wills  & 


SURROGATES'   COURTS  AND  RECORDS  115 

Probates,  I:  1-140.  The  last  proceedings  before  judge  Thomas  Tredwell  with 
David  Judson, clerk  were  on  Apr.  30,  1787.  The  next  page,  {W.  &  P.,  I: 
141),  is  occupied  by  a  certificate  of  appointment  of  William  Ogilvie  as  clerk  of 
the  court  of  probates  by  Peter  Ogilvie,  judge  of  the  court, dated  May  1,  1787. 
The  last  recorded  session  of  the  court  in  the  city  of  New  York  was  on  May  22 
1799,  with  Peter  Ogilvie,  judge;  W.  &■  P.,  2:  194.  The  first  proceeding  taken 
in  Albany  by  the  court  was  on  June  13,  1799,  before  Leonard  Gansevoort, 
judge,  with  Peter  Beeckman,  clerk;  W.  &  P.,  2:  199.  Peter  Beeckman 
continued  to  act  as  clerk  until  Feb.  17,  1804;   W.  &  P.,  2:  284. 

^^Session  Laws,  I:  439.  Fifth  Session,  Chap.  24,  passed  Mar.  26,  1782. 
"The  secretary  of  this  State  ******  to  deliver  up  all  such  records  and  papers 
now  in  his  possession  and  custody  as  belong  to  the  said  court  [of  probates] 
to  the  judge  of  the  said  court  *****  together  with  the  chests,  trunks  or  boxes 
in  which  they  are  contained." 

Assembly  Journal.,  1777-8,  p.  80.  By  resolution  introduced  in  the  senate 
Mar.  23,  1778,  the  secretary  of  state  and  the  county  clerks  were  authorized  to 
put  their  records  and  papers  "into  strong  and  light  Inclosures,  sufficient  to 
exclude  Rain,"  to  be  ready  for  instant  removal  in  case  of  danger;  a  military 
guard  to  be  furnished  if  demanded.  The  Assembly  concurred  in  this  resolu- 
tion, on  March  24th. 

^^N.  Y.  county  wills,  libers  33  and  36. 

^''Session  Laws,  I:  719.     Seventh  Session,  Chap.  50,  passed  May  10,  1784. 

^^Session  Laws,  II:  233.     Ninth  Session,  Chap.  27,  passed  Apr.  4,  1786. 

^^Session  Laws,  II:  419.  Tenth  Session,  Chap.  38,  passed  Feb.  20,  1787, 
to  take  effect  May  1,  1787.  The  law  provided  that  surrogates  should  be 
appointed  by  the  governor  with  the  advice  and  consent  of  the  council  of 
appointment.  It  specified  the  nature  of  the  records  to  be  kept;  that  original 
wills  may  be  returned.  "And  further  that  upon  the  death  or  removal  from 
office  of  any  such  surrogate  the  said  seal  and  all  original  wills  with  all  records, 
books  and  papers  belonging  to  the  said  office  shall  be  delivered  over  to  the 
successor  in  office." 

^^Session  Laws,  IV:  38.  Twentieth  Session,  Chap.  31,  passed  Mar.  10, 
1797. 

^'The  bill  rendered  for  the  removal  of  the  treasurer's  office  was  dated  Apr. 
2,  1799  and  paid  Apr.  30,  1799.  The  bill  for  the  removal  of  the  secretary's 
office  was  dated  June  27,  1799  and  paid  July  6,  1799.  Dates  obtained  from 
the  original  vouchers  on  file  in  the  comptroller's  office.  Also  see  Assembly 
Journal,  23rd  Session,  p.  27. 

^^Session  Laws,  IV:  390.     Twenty-second  Session,  Chap.  64. 

^^The  first  constitution,  adopted  Apr.  20,  1777,  Art.  XII,  divided  the  counties 
of  the  State  into  four  great  districts,  viz: 

Southern.  City  and  county  of  New  York,  Suffolk,  Westchester,  Kings, 
Queens  and  Richmond. 

Middle.     Dutchess,  Ulster,  Orange. 

Western.     City  and  county  of  Albany,  Tryon. 

Eastern.     Charlotte,  Cumberland,  Gloucester. 

Cf.  also  Session  Laws,  1791,  Chap.  IV. 

'^Session  Laws,  1802,  p.  159.     Chap.  LXXXIII. 

3»State  of  New  York,  Comptroller's  Office.     No.  363. 

Pay  to  Peter  Beekman,  Clerk  of  the  Court  of  Probates  *  *  *  *  in  full  for 

his  account  audited  by  me  this  day,  for  the  expence  of  assorting  and 

removing  of  certain  papers,  books,  minutes,  records  and  documents  from 

the  Office  of  the  Court  of  Probates  to  the  Surrogates  Office  of  the  City 

and  County  of  New  York. 

Dated,  Albany,  July  3,  1802.  Elisha  Jenkins,  Compt'r 

S199  25 

Received  Albany,  July  3,  1802,  $199.25 

Peter  Beeckman  1 


116  ROYDEN  WOODWARD  VOSBURGH 

State  of  New  York,  Comptroller's  Office.     No.  389. 

Pay  to  Silvanus  Miller  **********  for  his  expences  of  assorting 
and  removing  of  certain  papers,  books,  minutes,  records  and  documents 
from  the  Office  of  the  Court  of  Probates  to  the  Surrogates  Office  of  the  City 
and  County  of  New  York.     Dated,  Albany,  Aug.  27,  1802. 
$105.00.  Elisha  Jenkins,  Compt'r 

Received  Albany  27th.  Aug.  1802,  $105. 

Silvanus  Miller 

Also  see  Assembly  Journal,  26th  Session,  p.  23. 

^^Session  Laws,  V:  147.  Twenty-fourth  Session,  Chap.  77,  passed  Mar. 
27,  1801. 

^'Session  Laws  of  1813.  Chap.  LXXIX  (R.  L.),  passed  Apr.  8,  1813; 
§VIII. 

^^Session  Laws  oj  1823.  Chap.  LXX,  passed  Mar.  21,  1823.  Constitution 
of  1821,  adopted  Jan.  15-17,  1822,  Art.  IV,  Sec.  VII.  "The  governor  shall 
nominate,  by  message,  in  writing  and  with  the  consent  of  the  senate,  shall 
appoint,  all  judicial  officers,  except  justices  of  the  peace." 

^^Session  Laws  of  1829.     Chap.  180,  passed  Apr.  18,  1829. 

'^"Session  Laws  0}  184J.  Chap.  280,  an  act  in  relation  to  the  judiciary, 
passed  May  12,  1847;  see  §  §63  and  66. 

^^Revised  StattUes  of  State  of  N.  Y.,  1829.  Vol.  2,  pp.  222-3,  to  take  eflEect 
Jan.  1,  1830.     Part  III,  Chap.  II,  Title  I,  §8. 

^Session  Laws  oj  1847,  II:  399.  Constitution  of  1846,  adopted  Nov.  3, 
1846,  Art.  VI,  §14. 

^Session  Laws  of  1847.      Chap.  276,  passed  May  12,  1847,  §§  2,  12,  13,  14. 

"See  calendar  in  Holland  Society  of  N.  Y.  Year  Book,  1900:  129-58. 

^^The  will  of  Pieter  Jacobze  Boorsbome  was  proved  at  a  court  of  sessions 
held  for  the  city  and  county  of  Albany,  on  Mar.  4,  1686-7.  From  the  original 
draft  for  recording,  indorsed  "Peter  Jacobse  Boorsbome  wiU  1687;"  N.  Y. 
Surrogate's  files  of  original  wills,  1687.  The  will  was  probated  Apr.  13, 
1687.  The  will  of  Carsten  Fredricksen  was  proved  at  the  mayor's  court, 
Albany,  Dec.  11,  1688;  and  probated  before  the  prerogative  court  of  New 
England,  at  Boston,  Feb.  28,  1688-9;  Suffolk  cotmty,  Mass.  probate  registry, 
liber  10:  523. 

^^Albany  county  clerk's  office.  Notarial  Papers  I  and  //.  Translated  in 
New  York  State  Library,  History  Bulletin  10. 

^''Ulster  county,  N.  Y.  probate  records,  Vol.  I,  edited  by  Gustave  Anjou. 


REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS 

The  Story  of  Chautauqua.  By  Jesse  L.  Hurlbut.  (New- 
York:  G.  P.  Putnam's  Sons.  1921.  Pp.  xxv,  429.  Illustra- 
tions  and   index.) 

This  is  not  the  history  of  Chautauqua  county,  or  of  the  town 
of  Chautauqua,  or  even  of  the  village.  It  is  the  story  of  the 
beginning  and  development  of  a  great  movement  which  originated 
in  the  idea  of  starting  a  normal  class  for  training  Sunday  school 
teachers.  It  was  from  this  at  first  somewhat  limited  conception 
that  Chautauqua  became  "a  place,  an  idea,  and  a  force." 
Its  ideal  now  is  education  for  everybody,  ever5Avhere  and  in 
every  department  of  knowledge. 

In  this  volvime  is  unfolded  in  a  most  interesting  way  the  story 
of  how  the  founders  of  Chautauqua,  John  Heyl  Vincent  and  Lewis 
Miller,  joined  forces,  and  adopted  the  idea  of  holding  meetings, 
like  those  of  earlier  "camp  meetings,"  in  the  open  air  and  far 
from  a  great  city.  How  this  meeting  place  at  Fair  Point  on  Chau- 
tauqua Lake  in  western  New  York  virtually  grew  into  a  great 
community  for  recreation  and  education  is  Mr.  Hurlbut's  nar- 
rative. 

The  story  of  the  addition  of  other  activties  such  as  the  Chau- 
tauqua Literary  and  Scientific  Circle  and  of  the  School  of  Lan- 
guages, of  the  establishment  of  the  Chautauqua  Institution  and 
even,  for  a  time,  of  the  University,  of  the  creation  of  the  Chau- 
tauqua circuit  of  lecturers  and  of  many  minor  educational  in- 
stitutions makes  the  reader  realize  why  the  name  Chautauqua 
has  become  the  common  word  "chautauqua"  in  the  EngHsh 
language  and  is  understood  the  world  over  as  standing  for  an 
idea. 

Mr  Hurlbut  has  not  burdened  his  readers  with  documentary 
details,  but  has  aimed  to  tell  his  story  in  an  entertaining  fashion. 
In  this  he  has  so  far  succeeded  that  one  is  loth  to  lay  down  the 
volimie  once  he  has  taken  it  up.     Any  one  who  has  ever  been 

117 


118  REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS 

to  Chautauqua  or  benefited  by  the  work  of  that  great  institu- 
tion will  read  this  book  with  pleasure,  and  others,  who  know 
only  the  name,  will  be  truly  amazed  at  the  almost  miraculous 
power  for  growth  that  the  first  idea  had. 

The  Ratification  oj  the  Federal  Constitution  by  the  State  of  New 
York.  By  Clarence  E.  Miner,  Ph.D.  Volume  xciv,  number 
3  of  the  Studies  in  History,  Economics  and  Public  Law  of  Co- 
lumbia University.  (New  York :  Longmans,  Green  and  Company. 
1921.   Pp.    135.) 

This  study  is  one  that  has  been  long  needed  by  students  of 
the  history  of  New  York  State.  It  does  for  New  York  what 
Samuel  B.  Harding  did  for  Massachusetts  in  his  Contest  over  the 
Ratification  of  the  Federal  Constitution  in  the  State  of  Massachu- 
setts, published  a  quarter  of  a  century  ago.  The  author  offers 
an  apology  because  he  has  given  so  little  space  to  the  actual  rat- 
ification and  so  much  to  several  chapters  which  make  clear  the 
struggle  which  took  place  in  the  convention  at  Poughkeepsie. 
A  criticism  of  the  reader  will  probably  be  that  the  author  has  not 
given  enough  to  the  debates  over  ratification  in  the  convention, 
but  there  is  also  too  little  given  to  making  clear  the  reasons  why 
two-thirds  of  the  members  of  the  Convention  (there  were  in  all 
sixty-five)  were  at  the  beginning  hostile  to  ratification.  For  some 
of  the  members  there  is  considerable  detail  on  the  motives  which 
prompted  their  opposition,  but  for  many  others  almost  nothing 
is  given. 

It  is  true  that  local  material  for  a  study  of  this  kind  is  very 
sparse,  but  researches  in  town  records  and  local  genealogies 
frequently  reveal  reasons  why  family,  industrial  and  commercial 
antagonisms  were  carried  into  politics. 

These,  however,  are  sins  of  omission  rather  than  commis- 
sion, and  as  an  accotmt  of  the  line-up  of  political  parties  in 
New  York  from  1783-1787,  of  the  campaign  of  education  con- 
ducted by  the  parties  in  favor  and  against  the  adoption  of  the 
Federal  Constitution,  of  the  struggle  to  control  the  Convention, 
of  the  victory  of  the  anti-FederaHsts  led  by  Clinton,  and  of  the 
final  conversion  of  Melancton  Smith  by  Hamilton,  it  is  excel- 
lent. Had  the  author  been  so  minded  he  might  have  drawn 
a  striking  parallel  between  the  debates  in  this  convention  and 


REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS  119 

those  which  took  place  a  few  years  ago  over  the  League  of  Na- 
tions. The  anti-Federalists  used  the  same  tactics  as  the  oppo- 
nents of  the  League.  "Events  merely  possible,"  said  Hamilton, 
"have  been  magnified  by  distempered  imagination  into  inevitable 
realities;  and  the  most  distant  and  doubtful  conjectures  have 
been  formed  into  a  serious  and  infallible  prediction.  In  the 
same  spirit,  the  most  fallacious  calculations  have  been  made," 
and  much  else  in  the  same  vein. 

Melancton  Smith  in  debating  that  clause  of  the  constitution 
which  provided  for  submitting  the  accounts  of  the  federal  gov- 
ernment to  public  inspection  from  "time  to  time"  said  that  "from 
time  to  time  might  mean  from  century  to  centiuy,  or — in  any 
period  of  twenty  or  thirty  years."  He  showed  a  type  of  mind 
like  that  of  many  members  of  our  recent  Senate,  but  in  one 
respect  he  was  their  superior:  he  was  broad  minded  enough  to 
be  convinced  of  his  error. 

Henry  Hudson  s  Reize  onder  Nederlandsche  Vlag  van  Amster- 
dam naar  Nova  Zembla,  Amerika  en  terug  naar  Dartmouth  in 
Engeland,  1609,  volgens  het  Journaal  van  Robert  Juet.  Uitge- 
geven  door  S.  P.  L'Honore  Naber.  Met  4  kaarten  en  3  platen. 
Werken  uitgegeven  door  de  Linschoten-Vereeniging,  xix.  ('s-Gra- 
venhage:  Martinus  Nijhoff,  1921.     Pp.  xxii,  xxix,    137.) 

Hudson's  third  voyage,  by  which  the  Hudson  river  was  first 
fully  made  known  to  the  civilized  world,  was  orginally  under- 
taken in  the  interest  of  the  Dutch  East  India  Company  with 
a  view  of  seeking  a  north-east  passage  through  the  polar  region. 
As  such  it  forms  part  of  the  history  of  Dutch  arctic  exploration 
and,  apart  from  its  main  interest,  deserves  to  be  treated  from 
this  peculiarly  Dutch  point  of  view  in  the  publications  of  the 
Linschoten  Society. 

As  is  well  known,  the  only  journal  of  Hudson's  third  voyage 
that  is  known  to  exist  is  that  kept  by  the  English  mate,  Robert 
Juet.  This  journal  was  first  published  in  1625,  in  Ptu-chas' 
Hakluytus  Posthumus  or  Purchas  His  Pilgrimes;  reprinted  in  1809, 
in  the  first  volume  of  the  Collections  of  the  New  York  Historical 
Society;  then  included  in  G.  M.  Asher's  critical  edition  of  Hudson's 
four  voyages  printed  in  1860  for  the  Hakluyt  Society;  and  finally 
reprinted  in  the  new  edition  of  Ptuchas'  collection  published  at 


120  REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS 

Glasgow  in  1905-7.  Mr.  L'Honore  Naber  has  followed  the  slight- 
ly modernized  text  of  the  Glasgow  edition  and  added  an  excel- 
lent Dutch  translation,  for  the  preparation  of  which  his  train- 
ing as  a  naval  officer  and  a  thorough  familiarity  with  Dutch 
and  English  nautical  terms  gave  him  special  qualifications. 

In  the  introduction,  the  editor  treats  at  length  on  the  results 
of  Dutch  arctic  exploration  between  1597  and  1608  and  of  the 
views  which  Hudson  and  Plancius  held  in  regard  to  the  possibil- 
ity of  finding  a  north-west  passage  and  which  must  have  deter- 
mined Hudson  to  turn  about  when  he  foimd  the  north-east  pas- 
sage blocked.  In  connection  with  this  study  the  editor  points 
out  the  various  bits  of  information  which  have  come  to  light 
since  the  publication  by  the  Linschoten  Society,  in  1909,  of  the 
voyage  of  Jan  Comelisz  May  to  the  arctic  ocean  and  the  coast 
of  America  in  1611-12,  and,  more  particularly,  some  important 
maps  which  were  discovered  by  Dr.  F.  C.  Wieder  in  connection 
with  his  researches  for  I.  N.  P.  Stokes'  Iconography  of  Manhat- 
tan Island.  The  appendix  contains  extracts  from  resolutions  of 
the  Zeeland  chamber  of  the  Dutch  East  India  Company,  from 
the  correspondence  of  Ambassador  Jeannin,  from  de  Laet's  and 
van  Meteren's  histories,  the  Hessel  Gerritsz  tracts,  and  other 
sources.  Most  of  these  extracts  have  heretofore  appeared  in 
H.  C.  Murphy's  Henry  Hudson  in  Holland,  published  in  1859, 
and  reprinted  at  The  Hague  in  1909,  but  a  few  new  items  have 
been  added  and  other  extracts  have  been  given  at  greater  length. 

V.  L. 

Base  Hospital  No.  q  A.  E.  F.  A  History  of  the  Work  of  the  New 
York  Hospital  Unit  During  Two  Years  of  Active  Service.  By 
the  Padre  [Raymond  S.Brown.]  (New York.  Privately, printed. 
1920,     Pp.    221.    Illustrations.) 

This  is  the  kind  of  work  we  should  have  more  of.  To  many 
it  will  come  as  a  surprise  to  learn  that  long  before  the  World 
War,  and  certainly,  before  we  entered  it,  provision  had  been 
made  by  an  act  of  Congress  (1912)  by  which  base  hospital  units 
could  be  organized.  This  plan  consisted  in  having  each  one  of 
our  large  civil  hospitals  organize  their  forces  into  a  nucleus 
round  which  a  larger  organization  could  be  formed.     "By  June 


REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS  121 

15th,  1916,  the  organization   [of  this  New  York  Hospital]  was 
effected  and  became  subject  to  call  by  the  War  Department." 

The  story  of  the  war  work  of  the  hospital  is  then  told  from 
the  time  of  leaving  New  York  on  the  Finland,  August  7,  1917, 
to  the  return  to  Newport  News  April  27,  1919,  and  the  discharge 
of  the  organization  from  service  at  Camp  Upton,  May  5,  1919. 
The  narrative  is  followed  by  several  tables  of  statistics  on  cases 
admitted  and  treated,  laboratory  equipment,  et  cetera. 

Chaplain  Brown  has  told  his  story  in  an  interesting  fashion. 
Perhaps  the  best  chapters,  if  any  are  to  be  termed  such  more 
than  any  others,  are  those  devoted  to  the  orthopedic  work, 
to  reconstruction  activities  and  to  the  simple  and  brief  tribute 
to  the  American  soldier. 

All  told  New  York  State  had  nine  base  hospitals  in  the  war 
(Nos.  1,  3,  8,  9,  15,  19,  23,  33,  48).  Number  19,  from  Rochester 
has  also  had  its  story  told  by  Dr.  John  M.  Swan.  A  review  of 
his  book  will  appear  in  the  next  issue  of  this  Journal.  We 
ought,  however  to  have  accoimts  from  each  of  the  nine. 

J.  S. 

/^  The  Seventy -Fir  St  New  York  in  the  World  War.  Compiled  by 
Robert  Stewart  Sutliffe,  Regimental  Historian.  (No  place: 
Privately  published.  1922.  Pp..  xi,  522.  Illustrations  and 
maps.) 

The  69th  Regiment  of  the  New  York  National  Guard  was 
kept  as  a  unit  and  entered  the  World  War  as  the  165th  Infantry 
of  the  42d  Division,  but  in  the  case  of  the  71st  Regiment  of  the 
New  York  National  Guard  it  was  different.  This  was  disinte- 
grated and  its  members  served  by  transfer,  enlistment  or  com- 
mission in  over  300  different  organizations  of  the  army,  navy  and 
marine  corps.     These  are  listed  in  the  beginning  of  the  volimie. 

Scattered  through  so  many  units  the  history  of  the  71st  would 
be  a  history  of  virtually  the  whole  of  the  American  army  in  the 
World  War.  The  compiler  evidently  realized  this  and  as  a  sub- 
stitute he  has  had  certain  members  of  the  71st  write  chapters  on 
the  imits  with  which  they  were  connected.  This  volume  there- 
fore represents  a  sort  of  composite — a  series  of  pictures  without 
close  correlation.  Among  these  separate  stories  one  of  the  most 
interesting  is  that  by   Captain  Maslin  and  entitled    "To   the 


122  REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS 

Hindenburg  Line  and  Through  the  Hospitals."  Two  chapters, 
"Training  the  27th  Division  for  War"  and  "Battles  of  the  27th 
Division"  are  taken  by  permission  from  General  O 'Ryan's  book 
"The  Story  of  the  27th  Division." 

In  addition  to  these  chapters  there  are  some  on  "Commen- 
dations," "Killed  and  Died  of  Wounds,  Accident  and  Disease," 
"Wounded,"  "Decorations  and  Citations,"  "Individual  Records 
of  Officers  and  Enlisted  Men." 

The  volume  is  thus  made  of  up  a  series  of  entertaining  chapters 
and  is  at  the  same  time  a  useful  work  of  reference.  If  our  other 
National  Guard  units  in  New  York  State  were  to  follow  this 
example  in  publishing  their  histories  we  should  have  a  set  of  vol- 
umes of  interest  and  utility. 

J.  S. 

Yonkers  in  the  World  War,  Compiled  by  a  Committee,  P.  F. 
Harrington,  Chairman  (Norwood,  Mass :  Plimpton  Press.  1922. 
Pp.  ix,  139.  Illustrations.) 

Up  to  the  present  time  this  volume  is  probably  the  best  bal- 
anced history  of  the  participation  of  any  of  our  cities  in  the  World 
War.  In  this  review  it  is  impossible  to  enumerate  all  of  the 
activities  of  Yonkers  in  the  War.  The  list  is  very  imposing. 
It  is  difficult  to  discover  any  one  side  of  war  activities  which  is 
not  represented.  Here  we  find  an  accoimt  of  the  part  played  by 
the  27th  and  77th  Divisions,  by  Company  G  of  the  10th  Infantry 
of  the  New  York  State  National  Guard,  Yonkers  men  in  the  Navy, 
the  activities  of  various  organizations  of  veterans,  of  the  schools, 
of  auxiliary  and  patriotic  organizations,  the  church,  the  indus- 
trial establishments  et  cetera.  To  supplement  all  this  there  are 
provided  a  chronology  of  events  in  Yonkers  during  the  War, 
honor  rolls  of  soldiers  and  various  war  workers.  One  of  the 
pages  is  devoted  to  an  illustration  of  the  beautiful  permanent 
War  Memorial  which  the  City  of  Yonkers  has  erected. 

No  one  can  lay  down  this  volume  without  a  sense  of  its  com- 
pleteness and  a  feeling  of  gratification  that  the  city  has  done 
herself  proud  not  only  in  what  she  did  but  in  the  steps  she  has 
taken  to  preserve  her  history. 

J.  S. 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES 


HISTORICAL      SOCIETIES      AND      CLUBS 

At  the  annual  meeting  of  the  Oneida  Historical  Society  on 
January  9,  1922,  Frederick  T.  Proctor  was  chosen  president 
and  William  N.  Storr  corresponding  secretary. 

The  Rochester  Historical  Society  held  a  meeting  on  January 
9,  1922,  at  which  H.  Emerson  Babcock  read  a  paper  on  "Tryon 
City  and  Vicinity,"  a  story  of  a  lost  city. 

The  New  York  City  Chapter  of  the  Daughters  of  the  American 
Revolution  held  their  annual  reception  at  the  Hotel  Plaza,  New 
York  City  on  the  anniversary  of  the  wedding  day  of  George 
Washington  and  Martha  Custis.  Dr.  James  Sullivan,  the  New 
York  State  Historian  spoke  on  "George  Washington  and  His 
Times." 

At  a  meeting  of  the  local  chapter  of  the  D.  A.  R.  at  Schoharie 
in  January,  1922,  Lyman  Holmes  read  a  paper  on  the  "Captors 
of  Andre,"  in  refutation  of  an  article  by  George  S.  Bryan  in  the 
September,  1921,  number  of  The  Mentor. 

The  Onondaga  Historical  Society  observed  its  sixtieth  anni- 
versary on  January  13,  1922.  An  exhibition  of  old  views  of 
S37racuse  was  given. 

The  National  Historical  Association  met  in  New  York  City 
on  January  29,  1922,  to  celebrate  the  185th  anniversary  of  the 
birth  of  Thomas  Paine.  It  has  purchased  the  old  Paine  home 
in  Bleecker  street  and  intends  to  convert  it  into  a  school  and 
club  house.  It  has  petitioned  the  Board  of  Aldermen  to  change 
the  name  of  Barrow  street  to  Reason  Street. 

On  February  7,  1922,  Dr.  A.  H.  Shearer  addressed  the  Oneida 
Historical  Society  on  "Folk  Lore  of  History." 

At  the  meeting  of  the  Irondequoit  Chapter  of  the  D.  A.  R. 
in  Rochester  on  February  1,  1922,  Miss  Bertha  Coleman  spoke 
of  the  neglect  of  New  York  State  history. 

The  Rochester  Historical  Society  at  its  February,  1922,  meet- 
ing had  an  address  by  Judge  Lockwood  R.  Doty  on  the  "Gene- 
see Country  Historical  Federation." 

123 


124  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

The  Onondaga  Historical  Society  is  urging  the  newspapers 
and  city  officials  of  Syracuse  to  take  measures  to  have  a  suitable 
celebration  of  the  seventy-fifth  anniversary  of  the  incorporation 
of  the  city  on  December  14,  1922. 

Before  the  New  Century  Club  of  Utica  in  February,  1922, 
Mrs.  Charlotte  A.  Pitcher  gave  an  address  on  George  Washing- 
ton's visit  to  that  vicinity. 

The  Schenectady  County  Historical  Society  during  the  year 
1920,  received  from  the  Board  of  Supervisors  the  sum  of  $300 
for  the  proper  care  and  maintenance  of  the  old  coimty  building 
which   it   now   occupies. 

The  Patterson  Chapter  (Westfield,  New  York)  of  the  D.  A.  R. 
has  been  in  the  practice  of  giving  prizes  to  high  school 
students  for  the  best  essay  on  a  historical  subject.  This  year 
it  gave  an  additional  prize.  The  chapter  also  presented  a  dark 
blue  silk  banner  lettered  in  gold  to  the  John  W.  Rogers  Post  of 
the  American  Legion. 

Willard's  Mountain  Chapter  (Greenwich,  New  York)  of  the 
D.  A.  R.  has  had  meetings  this  year  on  county  history  by  towns. 
The  chapter  has  collected  256  World  War  records  for  the  Town 
Historian  and  intends  to  give  four  prizes  to  pupils  of  the  eighth 
grade  who  pass  the  best  examination  in  United  States  History. 
This  list  for  twenty-foiu-  years  now  contains  42  names.  Truly 
a  wonderful  record. 

At  the  annual  meeting  of  the  Minnesota  Historical  Society 
for  1921,  papers  were  read  on  "The  Historical  Work  of  Heredi- 
tary and  Patriotic  Societies"  by  Willoughby  M.  Babcock,  jr.; 
"The  Field  for  Local  and  Special  Historical  Societies,"  by 
R.  W.  G.  Vail. 

PUBLICATIONS,    BOOKS,    ARTICLES,    MANUSCRIPTS. 

The  Greatest  American,  Alexander  Hamilton  is  the  title  of  a 
book  by  A.  H.  Vandenberg  published  by  G.  P.  Putnam's  Sons. 

The  Rochester  Post  Express  in  its  issue  of  January  11,  1922, 
began  a  series  of  articles  on  the  pioneer  settlers  of  Western 
New   York. 

The  Watertown  Standard  in  its  Saturday  issues  has  been  carry- 
ing articles  on  local  history. 


M   s 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  125 

The  Albany  Knickerbocker  Press  in  its  issue  of  January  22, 
1922,  has  an  article  on  Robert  Flint  and  the  Five  Fighting  Flints 
of  the  Colonial  and  Revolutionary  Wars. 

In  the  Proceedings  of  the  Third  Annual  Conference  on  Indiana 
History  for  1922,  published  by  the  Indiana  Historical  Com- 
mission are  articles  on  The  Local  Library-A  Center  for  Historical 
Material;  Kinds  of  Material  to  be  Preserved  for  Historical  Pur- 
poses; The  Value  and  Importance  of  Historical  Markers;  The 
Writing  of  Family  Histories;  The  Local  Pioneer  as  seen  through 
Local  Pioneer  Laws;  The  Possibilities  of  Historical  Pilgrimages. 

The  Manuscripts  Division  of  the  Library  of  Congress  has 
received  typewritten  copies  of  the  correspondence  of  Colonel 
Nicholas  Fish  (of  New  York  State)    1785-1786. 

Theodore  Roosevelt  and  his  Times:  a  Chronicle  of  the  Progressive 
Movement  is  the  title  of  a  voliune  by  Harold  Howland  which 
appears  as  volumne  xlvii,  of  the  Chronicles  of  America  series 
published  by  the  Yale  University  Press. 

The  January,  1922,  number  of  The  Yale  Review  contains  many 
letters  of  James  Fenimore  Cooper,  edited  by  his  grandson  James 
Femimore  Cooper  of  Albany. 

Rural  New  York  by  E.  0.  Fippin  (Macmillan  Company,  New 
York,  1921)  contains  an  interesting  survey  of  this  field. 

In  the  Daughters  of  the  American  Revolution  Magazine  for 
January,  1922,  there  is  an  article  by  Major  Edwin  N.  McClellan 
U.  S.  M.  C.  entitled:  Continental  Marine  Officers  of  the  American 
Revolution.  There  are  also  accoimts  of  the  proceedings  of  Quas- 
saick  Chapter  (Newburg,  New  York)  and  of  the  Patterson 
Chapter   (Westfield,    New  York). 

The  Hero  of  the  Longhouse  is  the  title  of  a  book  by  Mary  E. 
Laing  giving  the  story  of  Hiawatha  and  the  Iroquois  in  New 
York.     (Pubhshed   by   the   World    Book    Company,    Yonkers.) 

The  Edison  Monthly  for  March  1922,  has  a  most  effective  illus- 
tration of  the  Poe  cottage  in  upper  New  York  City. 

In  Museum  Work  for  December  1920,  Frank  H.  Severance  has 
an   article   entitled:  The   Small   Historical   Museum. 

Guide  to  the  County  Archives  of  California  is  the  title  of  a  book 
written  by  Owen  C.  Coy  and  published  by  the  California  His- 
torical  Survey   Commission. 


126  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

In  the  February — May  1921,  number  of  the  Minnesota  His- 
tory Bulletin  is  an  article  on  The  Microscopic  Method  Applied  to 
History  by  Joseph  Schafer  which  is  a  description  of  the  so-called 
"Wisconsin  Domesday  Book."  which  he  is  making. 

In  the  Publications  of  IdeAmerican  Jewish  Historical  Society, 
niimber  28,  published  in  h22,  there  are  several  items  connected 
with  New  York  State  history :  Receipt  Book  of  Judah  and  Moses 
M.  Hays,  1763-1776;  An  Early  New  York  Legal  Document, 
(1711  in  the  Mayor's  Court);  A  New  York  Jewish  Silversmith  of 
the  Eighteenth  Century;  Three  Early  Letters,  1769-1782,  (all  address- 
ed to  Moses  M.   Hays). 

The  Indiana  Magazine  of  History  for  March  1922,  has  an 
article  on  Jesse  Kimball — Pioneer,  who  in  early  life  lived  in 
New  York  State  and  owned  property  in  Montgomery  County 
before  he  migrated  to  the  West. 

The  Magazine  of  American  History  for  October,  1921,  pays  a 
tribute  to  William  L.  Stone  for  the  love  of  historical  accuracy 
which  he  showed  when  getting  together  the  models  for  the  bas- 
reliefs  placed  in  the  Saratoga  Battle  Monument  at  Schuyler- 
ville,  and  contrasts  it  with  the  carelessness  displayed  by  sculptors 
and  artists  generally. 

The  Year  Book  of  the  Holland  Society  of  New  York,  igzo-igzi, 
contains  an  address  by  Josephus  Daniels  on  the  early  Ameri- 
can and  Dutch  relations  and  the  part  the  latter  played  in  the 
struggle  for  liberty;  an  address  by  Edgar  F.  Romig  on  the  part 
played  by  the  Dutch  in  the  Pilgrim  migration;  an  address  by 
Samuel  P.  Orth  on  the  "American  Pioneer." 

In  Famous  Colonial  Houses  by  Paul  M.  Hollister  (McKay 
Company,  Philadelphia)  are  described  two  houses  in  New  York 
State:  the  Jtimel  Mansion  in  New  York  City  and  the  Kendall 
House  at  Dobbs  Ferry. 

A  pamphlet  entitled  History  of  the  Reformed  Protestant  Dutch 
Church  at  Wawarsing,  Ulster  County  N.  Y.,  by  R.  W.  Vosburgh 
has  been  issued  by  the  New  York  Genealogical  and  Biographical 
Society. 

In  The  New  York  Historical  Society  Quarterly  Bulletin  for  Jan- 
uary, 1922,  appear  engravings  sho^Aring  Broadway  in  1816,  looking 
ncirth  from  VeSey  street,  and  Broadway  in  1841,  ffom  Grand 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  127 

to  Howard  streets.  The  latter  is  taken  from  a  model  in  the  pos- 
session of  the  Society.  There  are  also  articles  on  The  American 
Army  Button  of  the  War  of  the  Am  rican  Revolution  by  W.  L. 
Calver;  on  the  DePeyster  Family  Papers,  containing  some  1754 
manuscripts  ranging  in  date  from  1682-1827;  Trinity  Church 
Records;  a  Benedict  Arnold  Relic;  and  the  concluding  installment 
of  William  Kelby's  Notes  on  American  Artists.  This  latter  series 
of  articles  is  to  be  printed  separately  in  book  form. 

In  State  Service  for  January-February,  1922,  is  an  article  on 
Henry  J.  Coggeshall,  Oldtime  Senate  Leader  by  G.  G.  and  J.  S. 
Casey.  In  the  March-April  number  an  article  is  entitled  De- 
stroying the  Graves  of  Pioneers  by  Helen  G.  M.  Boomhower  and 
two  by  James  Sullivan,  entitled  To  Improve  the  Bennington  Battle- 
field Site  and  History  of  New  York  State's  Part  in  the  World  War. 

The  Mississippi  Valley  Historical  Review  for  March,  1922,  has 
an  article  by  A.  H.  Buffington  on  The  Policy  of  Albany  and  Eng- 
lish Westward  Expansion. 

In  the  Proceedings  of  the  New  Jersey  Historical  Society  for  Jan- 
uary, 1922,  is  an  article  on  The  Stirling  Baronetcy  Patents  and 
General  William  Alexander' s  Claim.  There  are  some  interesting 
notes  on  "No.  1  Broadway  and  Its  History;"  "The  Origin  of  Rip 
Van  Winkle."  In  a  diary  written  by  William  Johnson  and  entitled 
A  Young  Mans  Journal  of  i8oo-i8ij,  there  are  numerous  refer- 
ences to  people  in  New  York  City. 

Another  book  on  Theodore  Roosevelt  has  appeared  by  Herman 
Hagedorn  entitled  Roosevelt  in  the  Bad  Lands,  published  by 
Houghton,  Mifflin  and  Company. 

The  Indiana  Historical  Commission  has  published  Bulletin 
14   entitled   Historical   Markers  in   Indiana,    Indianapolis,  1922. 

The  Political  Science  Quarterly  for  December,  1921,  has  an  article 
by  George  W.  Edwards  entitled  New  York  City  Politics  Before 
the  American  Revolution. 

The  Port  of  New  York,  by  Thomas  E'  Rush  (Doubleday,  Page 
and  Company,  1920)  gives  much  space  to  the  history  of  the  port 
as  well  as  to  its  present  day  condition. 

In  the  Daughters  of  the  American  Revolution  Magazine  for 
February,  1922,  J.  C.  Fitzpatrick,  in  an  article  entitled  The  Story 
of  the  Purple  Heart,  gives  an  account  of  the  destruction  of  Fort 


128  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

George  and  fFort  Slongo  on  Long  Island  by  American  raiders 
from  the  Connecticut  shore.  T.  T.  Belote's  articles  on  Naval 
War  Medals  are  continued.  Interesting  accounts  of  the  activities 
of  the  New  Rochelle,  Deborah  Champion  (Adams,  N.  Y.),  Wom- 
en of  "76"  (Brooklyn,  N.  Y.),  and  Ondawa-Cambridge  (N.  Y.) 
chapters  are  given.  The  latter  on  August  25,  1921,  unveiled  a 
bronze  tablet  bearing  the  following  inscription:  "Site  of  the 
Checkered  House  built  by  Major  James  Cowden  1765,  Baum's 
Headquarters  Aug,  13,  1777,  Continental  Hospital  August  18, 
1777.  Erected  by  Ondawa-Cambridge  Chapter,  D.  A.  R.,  1921." 
An  illustration  of  it  is  given. 

History  of  Rafting  on  the  Delaware  is  the  title  of  a  paper  read 
before  the  Minisiiik  Valley  Historical  Society  by  William  Heidt, 
jr.,  February  22,  1921,  and  now  published  as  a  separate  pamphlet 
by  that  Society. 

In  the  Iowa  Journal  of  History  and  Politics  for  January,  1922, 
is  the  third  installment  of  L.  B.  Schmidt's  articles  entitled  The 
Internal  Grain  Trade  of  the  United  States.  i86o-i8go.  The  part 
played  by  the  Erie  Canal  is  covered  in  this  work. 

MUSEUMS,   HISTORIC    MONUMENTS   AND    REMAINS 

The  old  Putnam  cemetery  at  Saratoga  Springs  has  been  re- 
claimed from  the  state  of  neglect  in  which  it  has  fallen  and  has 
been  rededicated  with  appropriate  exercises.  Many  graves  of 
Revolutionary  soldiers  are  to  be  found  there.  In  1876  Cornelius 
E.  Durkee  deciphered  the  inscriptions  and  filed  a  list  with  the 
State   Library   at   Albany. 

At  the  last  session  of  the  New  York  State  Legislature  $4000 
was  appropriated  to  build  roads  and  make  repairs  to  the  house  in 
the  State  Park  at  Bennington  Battlefield. 

In  the  March  1922,  number  of  the  Daughters  of  the  American 
Revolution  Magazine  is  a  report  from  the  Saratoga  Chapter 
(Saratoga  Springs)  which  tells  of  the  bill  in  Congress  for  the 
survey  of  the  battlefield  of  Saratoga  and  which  also  gives  an 
account  of  the  location  of  twenty  Revolutionary  graves. 

At  its  meeting  on  February  13,  1922,  the  Rochester  Historical 
Society  endorsed  the  proposal  of  the  Buffalo  Chapter  of   the 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  129 

D.  A.  R.  to  have  the  State  Legislature  take  steps  to  have  Fort 
Niagara   resto  red . 

WORLD   WAR    MEMORIALS   AND    COLLECTIONS 

The  Committee  on  Memorial  Building  of  the  American  Legion 
of  Oneida  Coiuity  in  1920,  petitioned  the  Board  of  Supervisors 
to  erect  a  building  as  the  most  suitable  memorial  to  those  who 
served  from  the  county  in  the  World  War. 

The  total  number  of  hero  dead  from  New  York  State  in  the 
World  War  as  compiled  by  the  Adjutant  General's  office  at  Albany 
reaches  12,276.  Of  these  9,196  were  killed  overseas  and  3,080 
died  of  other  causes.  By  counties  they  are  as  follows:  Al- 
bany, 192;  Alleghany,  47;  Broome,  128;  Cattaraugus,  77; 
Cayuga,  72;  Chautauqua,  136;  Chemung,  83;  Chenango,  39; 
Clinton,  57;  Columbia,  50;  Cortland,  28;  Delaware,  54;  Dutch- 
ess, 100;  Erie,  711;  Essex,  44;  Franklin,  61;  Fulton,  36;  Gene- 
see, 43;  Greene,  42;  Hamilton,  6;  Herkimer,  90;  Jefferson,  110; 
Lewis,  24;  Livingston,  37;  Madison,  45;  Monroe,  374;  Mont- 
gomery, 70;  Nassau,  168;  New  York  City,  6,644;  Niagara,  181; 
Oneida,  204;  Onondaga,  282;  Ontario,  75;  Orange,  156;  Orleans, 
35;  Oswego,  82;  Otsego,  68;  Putnam,  13;  Rensselaer,  169;  Rock- 
land, 58;  St  Lawrence,  100;  Saratoga,  60;  Schenectady,  113; 
Schoharie,  11;  Schuyler,  11;  Seneca,  32;  Steuben,  80;  Suffolk, 
121;  Sullivan,  44;  Tioga,  22;  Tompkins,  32;  Ulster,  112;  Warren, 
42;  Washington,  50;  Wayne,  48;  Westchester,  400;  Wyoming,  29; 
Yates,  24;  residence  in  state  not  known,  54.  Of  the  total  nimi- 
ber  mentioned  above  1400  were  in  the  navy  and  marine  corps. 
By  counties  they  are  as  follows:  Albany  coimty,21;  Alleghany, 
2;  Broome,  15;  Cattaraugus,  11;  Cayuga,  12;  Chautauqua, 
10;  Chemung,  11;  Chenango,  5;  Clinton,  1;  Columbia,  3;  Cort- 
land, 3;  Delaware,  4;  Dutchess,  6;  Erie,  104;  Essex,  2;  Frank- 
lin, 4;  Fulton,  7;  Genesee,  7;  Greene,  3;  Herkimer,  7;  Jefferson, 
6;  Lewis,  3;  Livingston,  10;  Monroe,  63;  Madison,  6;  Mont- 
gomery, 6;  Nassau,  12;  New  York  City,  720;  Niagara,  22;  Oneida, 
31;  Onondaga,  28;  Ontario,  6;  Orange,  14;  Orleans,  5;  Oswego,  6; 
Otsego,  6;  Putnam,  2;  Rensselaer,  26;  Rockland,  4;  St  Lawrence, 
6;  Saratoga,  8;  Schenectady,  13;  Schoharie,  4;  Seneca,  6 ;  Steuben, 


130  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

17;  Suffolk,  25;  Sullivan,  4;  Tioga,  2;  Tompkins,  3;  Ulster,  8; 
Warren,  6;  Washington,  8;  Wayne,  7;  Westchester,  58;  Wyoming, 
3;  residence  in  state  not  shown  ,8. 

America  in  the  World  War  is  the  title  of  a  book  by  Colonel  P.  S. 
Bond  and  Colonel  CO.  Sherrill,  published  by  the  George  Banta 
Publishing  Company  of  Menasha,  Wisconsin, 

Memoirs  of  the  Harvard  Dead  in  the  War  Against  Germany  by 
M.  A.  De  Wolfe  Howe  has  been  published  by  the  Harvard  Univer- 
sity Press  at  Cambridge,  Massachusetts.  Many  of  these  men 
were  from  New  York  State. 

Mr.  E.  R.  Foreman,  City  Historian  of  Rochester  called  a  meet- 
ing of  all  the  local  historians  of  Monroe  County  on  February 
17,  1922.  They  met  in  the  rooms  of  the  Rochester  Historical 
Society  in  Exposition  Park  and  organized  the  Monroe  County 
Historical  Commission.  Edward  C.  Hanna,  supervisor  of  the 
sixth  ward  of  Rochester  was  chosen  chairman  and  H.  C.  Brainard, 
local  historian  of  Ogden  and  Spencerport,  secretary. 

The  Jefferson  County  Board  of  Supervisors  have  erected  a 
tablet  in  the  County  Building  as  a  memorial  to  those  from 
the  county  who  gave  their  lives  for  their  country  in  the  World 
War.  A  picture  of  the  tablet  and  the  address  delivered  on  the 
occasion  of  its  dedication  appear  in  the  1921  Proceedings  of  the 
Board  of  Supervisors. 

In  The  Missouri  Historical  Review  for  January  1922,  is  an 
illustration  of  the  montmient  which  is  to  be  erected  in  France  to 
the  memory  of  the  soldiers  of  Missouri  that  perished  in  the  World 
War. 

The  pamphlet  entitled  Reports  of  the  President  and  Secretary 
of  the  Buffalo  Historical  Society  for  the  year  1921,  is  a  compen- 
dium of  the  history  of  Buffalo  for  that  period  under  such  titles 
as  "Military  Honors  to  Buffalo's  Heroes;"  "Anniversaries  Cele- 
brated;" "Transactions  and  Events  in  the  Year  1921;"  "Buffalo- 
nians  Honored  by  the  French  Government;"  "Distinguished 
Visitors;"   "Biiffalonians  who  Died  in  1921;"  and  many  others. 

History  of  the  3 2 2d  Field  Artillery.  (Yale  University  Press, 
New  Haven)  is  the  title  of  an  interesting  story  of  this  unit.  Though 
composed  almost  entirely  of  Ohio  men  it  was  commanded  by 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  131 

Colonel  A.  B.  Warfield  who  was  born  in  Prattsburg,  Steuben 
County,    New   York. 

Battlefields  of  the  World  War:  A  Study  in  Military  Geography, 
is  the  title  of  a  book  by  Douglas  Wilson  Johnson  published  by 
the  American  Geographical  Society  in  1921.  (New  York  City.) 

In  volume  xv  of  a  publication  entitled  The  Medical  Depart- 
ment of  the  United  States  Army  in  the  World  War  appear  some 
very  interesting  statistics  about  New  York  State  troops. 


STATEMENT 

Statement  of  Ownership,  Management,  Circulation,  etc.,  required  by  the 
Act  of  Congress  of  August  24,  1912,  of  the  Quarterly  Journal  of  the  New 
York  State  Historical  Association,  published  quarterly  at  Albany,  N,  Y., 
for  April  1,  1922.  State  of  New  York,  County  of  Albany.  Before  me,  a 
Notary  Public,  in  and  for  the  State  and  County  aforesaid,  personally  appear- 
ed James  Sullivan,  who,  having  been  duly  sworn  according  to  law,  deposes  and 
says  that  he  is  the  Editor  of  the  Quarterly  Journal  of  the  New  York  State 
Historical  Association,  and  that  the  following  is,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge 
and  belief,  a  true  statement  of  the  ownership,  management,  etc.,  of  the 
aforesaid  publication  for  the  date  shown  in  the  above  caption,  required  by 
the  Act  of  August  24,  1912.  1.  PubHsher,  New  York  State  Historical  Associ- 
ation, Editor  and  Managing  Editor,  James  Sullivan,  Albany,  N.  Y.  Business 
Manager,  none.  2.  That  the  owners  are:  The  New  York  State  Historical 
Association  and  issues  no  stock;  officers  are  Gilbert  D.  B.  Hasbrouck,  Kings- 
ton, President;  F.  H.  Severance,  Buffalo,  First  Vice-President;  James  G. 
Riggs,  Oswego,  Second  Vice-President;  James  Sullivan,  Albany,  Corre- 
sponding Secretary;  Frederick  Richards,  Glens  Falls,  Recording  Secretary 
and  Treasurer.  3.  That  the  known  bondholders,  mortgagees  and  other  secur- 
ity holders  owning  or  holding  1  per  cent,  or  more  of  total  amount  of  bonds, 
mortgages,  or  other  securities  are:  None.  Signed,  James  Sullivan,  Editor. 
Sworn  to  and  subscribed  before  me  this  24th  day  of  March,  1922.  (Seal) 
Herbert  J.  Hamilton,  Notary  Public.  (My  commission  expires  Match  30, 
1924.) 


The 
Quarterly  Journal 


of  the 


New  York  State  Historieal 
Association 


Volume  in  July    1922  Number  3 


Entered  as  second  class  mail  imatter  October  22,   1919,  at  the  Post  Office  at  Albany,  New  York 
under  the  Act  o£  August  24,  1912. 


NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION 
Quarterly  Journal 

Editorial  Committee 

JAMES  SULLIVAN,  Managing  Editor 

DIXON  R.  FOX  FREDERICK  B.  RICHARDS 


CONTENTS 

HISTORY  OF  THE  REGULATION  OF  PUBLIC  SERVICE 
CORPORATIONS  IN  NEW  YORK 
Martin  S.  Decker     133 

THE  HISTORY  OF  FORT  TICONDEROGA 

-----         Helen  Ives  Gilchrist     147 

WOMEN  OF  NEW  YORK  STATE  IN  THE  REVOLUTION 

------     Amelia  Day  Campbell     155 

ANXIOUS  MOMENTS  IN  FRONTIER  HISTORY 

R.  Bruce  Taylor    169 

REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS 179 

Perry,  The  Plattsburg  Movement;    Slattery,  David  Hum- 
mel  Greer;      Ingraham,    Washington  Irving    and    Other 

Essays;    ,  The  World  War,  Selective  Service  in 

the  County  oj  Albany  in  the  State  of  Nevu  York. 

NOTES  AND  QUERIES 183 


Subscription  Price  SI  .50  Single  Nombers  40  centa 

Address  all  contributions  and  communications  to 
New  York  State  Historical  Association,  Albany 


VOL.  III.  JULY  1922  NO.  3. 

1  he  (Quarterly  J  ournal 

of  the  New  York  State  Historical  Association 


HISTORY  OF  THE  REGULATION  OF  PUBLIC 

SERVICE  CORPORATIONS  IN 

NEW  YORKi 

We  are  living  in  a  time  of  detailed  and  minute,  even  meticulous 
regulation  of  railroad,  gas,  electric,  telephone  and  telegraph 
corporations  in  the  State  of  New  York.  The  present  regulating 
statutes  also  include  auto-bus  coaches.  From  an  ineffective 
Railroad  Commission  Law  passed  in  1882,  conferring  generally 
only  powers  of  recommendation,  and  a  commission  of  gas  and 
electricity  law  passed  in  1905,  vesting  only  a  few  actual  powers  in 
that  Corn-mission,  we  proceed  in  1907  to  a  comprehensive  State 
schem-e  of  regulation  known  as  the  Hughes  Public  Service  Com- 
missions Law,  which  at  once  became  recognized  as  an  effective 
statutory  plan  for  the  regulation  of  railroads,  gas  and  electricity. 
Later  this  plan  was  enlarged  to  take  in  the  telephone  and  tele- 
graph in  1910,  and  steam  corporations  were  brought  under  the  law 
in  1913. 

During  the  Hughes  administration  from  1907  to  1910,  political 
considerations  had  no  weight  and  had  no  part  in  the  appointment 
of  the  commissioners.  In  all  of  the  succeeding  administrations 
political  considerations  have  swayed  and  often  controlled  the 
selection  of  the  commissioners.  With  few  exceptions  however, 
the  appointees  since  1910  to  both  the  New  York  City  or  First 
Commission  and  the  up-State  or  Second  District  Commission 
have  been  able  men.  The  great  mistake  m.ade  in  the  system  of 
appointm.ent  of  the  members  of  these  Comjrdssions,  who  had 
thoroughly  demonstrated  their  efficiency,  and  who  by  previous 
service  in  the  position  had  become  through  their  experience  in 
administration  of  the  laws  of  ver\'  great  service  to  the  State  and  the 

lAn  Address  delivered  at  the  Lake  George  meeting  of  the  New  York  State 
Historical  Association,  October  4,  1921.  Mr.  Martin  Decker  the  author  of 
this  paper  died  July  1,  1922. 


134  MARTIN  5.  DECKER 

people  at  large,  and  in  fact  had  become  public  officer  assets  in  a 
very  real  sense,  is  that  they  were  discarded  and  their  service 
qualifications  disregarded,  in  order  to  satisfy  the  forceful  demand 
for  political  patronage  in  each  of  the  existing  administrations. 
No  new  incumbent  of  the  office  can  reach  full  efficiency  without 
an  experience  of  two  or  three  years. 

This  mistake  was  committed  after  1910  both  by  Democratic 
and  Republican  administrations.  These  appointments  upon 
political  grounds  have  been  deplored  by  all  men  having  real  in- 
terest in  the  ftdlest  efficiency  of  Public  Service  regulation.  It  is 
a  course  directly  opposed  to  the  appointment  policy  which  was 
established  by  Governor  Hughes.  It  has  justified  the  fears  of 
those  who  opposed  the  enactment  of  the  Hughes  Public  Service 
Commissions  Law  in  1907  and  who  asserted  that  politics  sooner 
or  later  would  govern  or  dictate  the  appointments  to  these  Com- 
missions. Those  fears  were  expressed  because  the  old  Board  of 
Railroad  Commissioners  had  become  notoriously,  as  to  its  mem- 
bership, the  football  of  politics.  For  that  reason  doubtless,  in 
the  make  up  of  his  appointments  to  the  Commissions,  Governor 
Hughes  rejected  the  name  of  any  member  of  that  Board  for 
designation  upon  either  of  the  two  new  Commissions. 

In  1921  amiendments  were  made  to  the  Public  Service  Commis- 
sions Law  which  consolidated  the  two  Commissions  into  a  single 
Public  Service  Commission,  and  greatly  expanded  the  powers 
theretofore  conferred  by  law.  In  making  his  appointments  to  the 
Commission,  the  Governor  passed  over  the  evident  qualifications 
of  members  of  the  former  Second  District  Commission  who  had 
fully  demonstrated  their  fitness  and  efficiency.  This  change 
took  place  no  longer  ago  than  last  April.  The  appointees  to  the 
new  Commission  were  all  men  without  experience  as  commissioners, 
although  one  of  them  had  had  some  experience  upon  the  legal  staff 
of  a  fonner  First  District  Commission.  The  present  members 
of  the  Commission  are  all  of  the  same  political  party.  For  a 
short  time  in  the  administration  of  a  Democratic  Governor,  the 
members  of  the  Second  District  Commisssion  all  belonged  to  the 
Democratic  party.  All  this  is  said,  of  course,  with  no  intention  to 
detract  from  any  effective  work  that  has  been  or  may  be  mani- 
fested by  the  Commission,  but  no  statement  of  Public  Service 
regulation  in  this  State  should  omit  reference  to  the  manner  of 


REGULATION  OF  PUBLIC  SERVICE  135 

selecting  the  commissioners  charged  with  administration  of  the 
Public  Service  laws.  It  should  be  evident  that  the  methods  of 
appointment  of  these  various  commissioners  during  all  of  the  past 
eleven  years  have  not  been  such  as  to  command  complete  con- 
fidence on  the  part  of  the  public  or  the  affected  corporations. 
Whatever  good  results  have  been  achieved  have  been  in  spite  of 
those  methods.  It  is  impossible  to  view  the  change  made  in  the 
First  District  Commission  during  the  last  Democratic  adminis- 
tration, so  far  as  the  membership  of  the  Commission  was  con- 
cerned, without  coming  to  the  conclusion  that  one  of  the  prime 
motives  of  the  change  was  to  effect  what  is  commonly  termed 
"ripper  legislation" — in  other  words  to  take  over  the  offices  with  a 
view  to  filling  them  with  members  of  a  particular  political  party. 
The  effect  of  the  membership  changes  in  1921,  in  a  sense,  was  the 
same.  Plainly  the  law  coiild  have  been  amended  without  abolish- 
ing the  First  District  Commission  in  1919  and  without  completely 
abolishing  the  Second  District  Commission  in  1921.  Under  the 
precedents  so  set,  in  the  event  of  a  change  of  administration  from 
one  political  party  to  another,  no  member  of  the  new  Public 
Service  Commission  can  confidently  rely  upon  being  permitted  to 
serve  out  his  term  of  office,  for  the  temptation  to  take  possession  of 
these  high  salaried  offices  for  the  purposes  of  political  patronage 
will  be  irresistible  in  the  future  as  it  has  been  in  the  past.  In- 
stead of  the  present  statutory  ten  year  term,  the  term  of  office  is 
likely  to  be  confined  to  the  duration  of  the  present  political  party 
in  power.  The  conditions  do  not  engender  optimism  in  the  dis- 
passionate observer  as  to  the  early  creation  of  ideal  situations  in  the 
regulation  of  public  utiHties  in  this  State. 

If  these  commissioners  coiild  be  made  constitutional  officers,  as 
are  judges  of  the  Supreme  Court,  and  if  by  amendment  the  Consti- 
tution could  be  made  to  provide  that  not  more  than  a  majority  of 
the  commissioners  may  be  of  the  same  political  party,  as  is  the  rule 
for  appointments  to  the  Interstate  Commerce  Commission,  most 
of  the  incentive  to  make  political  appointments  to  the  State  com- 
mission would  disappear.  A  separate  amendment  to  the  con- 
stitution of  this  character  should  be  proposed  by  the  legislature. 

The  new  Commission  of  course  is  on  trial;  they  are  men  of 
real  ability;  they  are  doing  their  best  to  complete  an  effective 
office  reorganization;  they  are  conducting  their  hearings  with  a 


136  MARTIN  S.  DECKER 

view  to  a  complete  record  of  all  essential  facts.  The  few  im- 
portant decisions  which  they  have  rendered  thus  far  have  not 
ignored  the  public  conception  of  fair  determination.  It  is  to  be 
hoped  that  the  tenor  of  their  future  determinations  will  continue 
the  record  m.ade  by  the  former  Second  District  Commission  of 
fearless  fair  treatment  of  the  public  service  corporations  and  the 
people  they  serve. 

The  powers  of  the  new  Commission  relate  to  authorization  to 
companies  to  do  business  as  a  public  necessity;  to  construction  of 
plants,  roads  and  lines ;  to  capitalization,  rates,  service  accounts, 
annual  and  periodic  reports,  improvements  and  extensions,  re- 
organizations, transfer  of  corporate  property  used  in  public  service, 
suspension  of  increased  rates,  issuance  of  temporary  rate  orders, 
accident   investigations,    and   numerous   other  matters.     In   all 
these  proceedings  the  burden  of  proof  is  upon  the  corporations. 
The  amendments  of  1921,  though  condemned  strongly  by  various 
daily  newspapers  as  in  favor  of  the  corporations,  really  increased 
the  burdens  of  regulation  upon  the  corporations.     It  has  been 
said  that  the  power  to  grant  temporary  rate  increases  favors  the 
corporation,  but  the  exercise  of  that  power  is  limited  to  the  purpose 
of  necessity  in  the  public  interest  by  providing  safe,  adequate  and 
efficient  service,  or  for  preservation  of  the  property.     The  only 
concession  to  the  corporations  contained  in  the  new  law,  as  com- 
pared with  the  former  law,  is  found  in  the  amendment  giving  the 
Corn-mission  the  power  to  fix  a  rate  notwithstanding  a  lower  rate 
has  been  fixed  by  statute  or  as  a  condition  in  a  local  franchise. 
This  change  in  the  regulating  statute  has  been  found  necessary  to 
enable  the  Commission  to  take  into  account  and  give  effect  to 
conditions  that  have  arisen  long  after  the  statutory  maximum 
rate  may  have  been  prescribed  by  the  legislature  and  long  after 
the  local  franchise  containing  a  rate  restriction  may  have  been 
granted. 

The  new  law  of  1921  also  establishes  a  Transit  Commission  for 
New  York  City,  having  charge  of  transportation  within  the  city 
of  New  York,  including  subways  and  subway  construction.  It 
has  large  and  complete  powers.  The  Transit  Commission  feature 
of  the  law  is  being  bitterly  opposed  by  factions  representing  both 
political  parties  in  New  York  City,  particularly  with  reference  to 
the  desired  continuance  of  the  present  five  cent  faie  in  the  subways 


REGULATION  OF  PUBLIC  SERVICE  137 

and  over  the  surface  and  elevated  lines.  Both  parties  appear  to 
be  demanding  "home  rule"  as  against  State  regulation.  There  is 
no  room  for  doubt  of  the  supreme  authority  of  the  State  to  es- 
tablish regulations  embracing  the  powers  and  duties  conferred 
upon  the  Transit  Commission.  The  State  authority  has  been 
frequently  upheld  by  the  coiirts.  The  objections  to  the  vested 
jurisdiction  of  the  Transit  Commission  appear  to  arise  largely 
from  the  New  York  City  political  situation  and  the  mayoralty 
campaign  which  is  now  pending.  The  Transit  Commission  has 
just  published  a  proposed  plan  of  Municipal  ownership  of  all 
local  railroad  transportation  utilities  in  New  York  City. 

In  1920,  after  restoration  by  the  Federal  Government  of  the 
railroads  to  their  owners,  numerous  amendments  were  added  by 
Congress  to  the  Interstate  Commerce  Act,  among  them  full  and 
exclusive  powers  over  railroad  capitalization  by  the  Interstate 
Coinmerce  ComJmssion,  and  also  provisions  imder  which  the 
Interstate  Commerce  Commission,  in  August  1920  asserted  juris- 
diction over  railroad  rates  on  traffic  carried  wholly  within  the 
State.  That  jurisdiction  has  been  upheld  by  some  of  the  Federal 
Circuit  Courts  and  also  to  some  extent  by  our  own  State  courts. 

If  this  assertion  of  Federal  jurisdiction  over  purely  state  traffic 
shaU  be  finally  upheld  by  the  United  States  Supreme  Court, 
centralization  of  regulating  powers  in  the  Federal  Government 
will  become  practically  complete.  This  centralization  of  regu- 
lating powers  has  been  earnestly  advocated  by  nearly  all  railroad 
managers.  Nevertheless,  in  view  of  the  present  minute  regulation 
imposed  upon  the  railroads  under  the  Interstste  Commerce  Act, 
and  with  considerable  discontent  on  the  part  of  railway  executives 
even  now  being  manifested,  it  is  possible  that  the  pendulum  of 
railroad  opinion  and  much  of  public  opinion  will  soon  swing  back 
to  an  advocacy  of  modified  State  regulation  of  state  traffic  and 
state  rates.  It  is  also  possible  that  the  situation  will  be  clarified 
legislatively  by  Congress  through  modification  of  the  Federal 
regulating  statute  so  that  state  supervision  overstate  railroad  rates 
will  become  definitely  restored.  Under  present  conditions,  the 
states  may  be  said  to  retain  only  incidental  powers  of  regulation 
over  railroad  service  within  the  states  and  so  far  as  rates  and  cap- 
italization are  concerned  the  powers  of  the  State  Commission  have 
no  practical  force.     The  authority  of  our  State  Commission  is 


138  MARTIN  S.  DECKER 

therefore  largely  limited  in  respect  to  railroads,  to  the  electric, 
street  and  interurban  systems  which  operate  wholly  within  the 
borders  of  the  State. 

A  detailed  account  of  the  provisions  of  law  authorizing  con- 
struction of  railroads  and  other  public  utilities  in  the  State  of 
New  York  and  the  statutory  provisions  governing  the  formation 
of  the  corporations,  as  enacted  from  time  to  time,  while  possibly 
valuable  and  interesting  as  a  record  of  formal  action  reqmred  by 
statute,  would  hardly  constitute  a  desirable  division  under  the 
title  of  this  paper,  and  it  would  also  unduly  prolong  its  length  to  an 
extent  likely  to  prove  wearisome. 

Legislation  for  the  specific  regulation  of  water  companies  has 
been  several  times  proposed  and  urged,  but  those  companies  are 
still  free  from  state  commission  control  of  their  rates  or  capitali- 
zation. 

Railroads  were  first  made  the  subject  of  regulation  in  the  State 
of  New  York  by  enactment  of  a  law  constituting  a  Board  of  Rail- 
road Conr-inissioners  in  1855,  but  this  was  found  in  that  early 
time  to  be  an  inconvenient  interference  with  railroad  plans,  and 
so  the  roads  paid  the  commissioners  the  full  amount  of  their 
salaries  for  the  term  for  which  they  were  appointed,  ($25,000)  to 
silence  their  opposition,  and  then  procured  the  repeal  in  1857 
of  the  law  creating  the  Commission.  Another  Board  of  Railroad 
Commissioners  was  estabHshed  in  1882.  A  Commission  of  Gas 
and  Electricity  was  established  by  law  effective  June  30,  1905 
commonly  known  as  the  Gas  and  Electricity  Act.  As  before 
stated  these  two  commissions  were  abolished  and  the  acts  creating 
them  repealed  by  the  Public  Service  Commissions  Law  of  1907 
effective  July  1  of  that  year.  In  1910,  the  jurisdiction  of  the 
Second  ccmjnonly  known  as  the  "up-State,"  Commission,  was 
extended  to  include  the  regulation  for  the  whole  State  of  tele- 
phone and  telegraph  companies. 

It  is  now  necessary  to  give  some  account  of  the  conditions 
adversely  affecting  the  public  interest  which  impelled  the  State, 
in  the  exercise  of  its  sovereign  power,  to  establish  regulation  by 
com^mission  of  these  various  public  utilities.  To  do  this,  we  must 
first  attempt  to  describe  the  railroad  operating  conditions  and 
practices  prior  to  the  act  of  1882  establishing  the  Board  of  Rail- 
road Commissioners.     These  railroad  operating  conditions  and 


REGULATION  OF  PUBLIC  SERVICE  139 

practices  are  well  stated  in  what  is  known  as  the  "Hepburn  Rail- 
road Committee  Report  of  1879."  This  report  bears  the  title, 
"Report  of  the  Special  Committee  on  Railroads,  Appointed  Under 
a  Resolution  of  the  Assembly,  February  28,  1879,  to  Investigate 
Alleged  Abuses  in  the  Management  of  Railroads  Chartered  by  the 
State  of  New  York. ' '  That  report,  consisting  of  five  large  volumes, 
was  submitted  by  the  Committee,  January  22,  1880.  The  direc- 
tion to  the  Committee  in  the  resolution  of  February  28,  1879  was 
"to  report  to  the  legislature,  either  at  the  present  or  the  next 
session,  by  bill  or  otherwise,  what,  if  any,  legislation  is  .necessary 
to  protect  and  extend  the  commercial  and  industrial  interests  of 
the  State." 

This  was  the  first  legislative  investigation  to  develop  an  ex- 
haustive record  of  the  numerous  railroad  abuses  which  had  grown 
up  from  an  utterly  reckless  general  disregard  by  railroad  managers 
of  the  obligations  imposed  by  railroad  charters  and  the  simplest 
concepts  of  duty  arising  from  common  public  carriage,  most  of 
which  had  been  reasserted  in  judicial  decisions  applying  the 
common  law.  The  Hepburn  Committee  report,  attracting  as  it 
did  the  widest  public  attention,  became  at  once  the  basis  of  agitated 
discussions  in  commercial  circles,  and  it  has  ever  since  been  re- 
garded as  a  legislative  classic.  It  really  paved  the  way  for  and 
constituted  chiefly  the  basis  of  the  almost  immediate  subsequent 
investigations  held  by  committees  of  Congress,  both  Senate  and 
House,  from  which  developed  finally  the  report  of  the  United 
States  Senate  Committee  on  Interstate  Commerce  of  1886, 
covering  railroad  operations  and  practices  throughout  the  whole 
country,  and  containing  the  tremendous  final  indictment  of  rail- 
road companies  and  managers  which  resulted  in  the  passage  in 
February  1887  of  the  Federal  act  to  regulate  commerce  and  the 
establishment  of  the  Interstate  Commerce  Commission. 

In  these  days  of  super-regulation  of  railroads  by  the  Federal 
Government,  extending  to  prescription  of  rates,  fares  and  charges 
and  almost  every  railroad  practice,  railroad  service  of  all  descrip- 
tions, the  supply  of  freight  cars,  safety  appliances,  wages  of  rail- 
road employees,  stock  and  bond  issues,  government  credit  to 
refund  railroad  debts  to  the  government  arising  out  of  Federal 
railroad  operation  during  the  World  War,  and  also  loans  to  the 
railroad  companies  from  the  United  States  Treastu-y — in  these 


140  MARTIN  S.  DECKER 

days  when  railroad  executives  must  bend  supinely  to  dictation 
from  the  Federal  authorities,  including  even  the  suggestions  of 
action  or  non-action  emanating  from  bureau  chiefs — it  is  of  pe- 
culiar historical  interest  to  note  from  the  Hepburn  committee 
report  of  1879  the  reference  to  "Raihoad  Kings"  and  the  long 
recital  of  special  rates  and  other  favors  dispensed  to  particular 
industries  or  great  commercial  enterprises  by  railroad  traffic 
managers  who  freely  exercised  the  power  to  bestow  prosperity  or, 
through  favors  withheld,  inflict  ruin  upon  shippers  over  their 
railroads. 

The  following  statements  are  taken  from  or  based  upon  the 
Hepburn  Railroad  Committee  Report  of  1879.  One  of  the 
paramount  duties  of  the  State  is  to  provide  means  for  the  inter- 
communication of  its  people  and  the  exchange  of  commerce. 
This  was  originally  the  turnpike;  which  continued  as  the  only 
means  of  inland  communication  until  the  ease  and  facility  of 
water  communication  suggested  and  brought  forth  the  Erie 
Canal,  which  did  so  much  to  promote  the  growth  of  the  city  of 
New  York.  Another  and  grander  advance  was  in  store.  The 
railroad  burst  upon  the  scene.  Crude  and  experimental,  at  first 
distrusted  by  capitalists,  it  turned  in  its  infancy  to  the  State  to 
ask  material  support.  The  railroad  was  given  every  concession 
by  the  legislature.  It  grew  up  under  the  fostering  policy  of  the 
State.  Strengthened  by  bounty  and  armed  with  the  power  of 
eminent  domain,  it  extended  its  tracks  until  in  1878  the  State 
was  grid-ironed  by  railroads,  comprising  within  its  limits,  5,550 
miles  and  within  the  United  States  81,841  miles.  (The  present 
railroad  mileage  is  about  8,300  miles  in  this  State,  and  the  total 
United  States  railroad  mileage  is  about  270,000.)  Along  these 
iron  rivers  flow  the  currents  of  commerce  that  formerly  sought  an 
outlet  through  the  rivers  of  nature — these  iron  rivers  that  span 
the  country,  toying  with  nature's  obstacles  as  with  a  myth. 

By  1879  the  State  had  contributed  in  aid  of  the  railroads 
$8,000,000  in  roimd  numbers,  and  various  localities  in  the  State  by 
donation  and  investment  in  stocks  and  bonds,  $31,000,000,  for 
which  unwise  action  so  many  localities  were  suffering  in  1879 
and  continued  to  suffer  dining  subsequent  years. 


REGULATION  OF  PUBLIC  SERVICE  141 

The  great  mistake  was  in  not  providing  proper  safeguards  to 
protect  the  pubHc  interest  and  hold  the  roads  to  a  strict  accounta- 
bihty  for  their  transactions.  Abuses  crept  in  that  were  so  glaring 
in  their  proportions  as  to  savor  of  fiction  rather  than  actual  history. 

It  was  originally  supposed  that  only  passengers  and  not  freight, 
except  in  the  most  limited  degree,  coiild  be  carried  by  rail.  Statu- 
tory restrictions  were  accordingly  thrown  around  the  passenger 
traffic.  At  first,  the  roads  were  forbidden  to  carry  frieght  in 
opposition  to  the  canal  and  later,  when  the  railroads  now  forming 
the  New  York  Central  were  found  to  be  carrying  freight,  they 
were  required  to  pay  to  the  canal  fund  a  simi  equal  to  the  tolls 
exacted  for  a  similar  carriage  by  canal.  This  restriction  how- 
ever, was  soon  removed  and  the  railroads  were  left  to  their  own 
management,  practically  unrestricted  and  imcontrolled  as  to 
freight  carriage. 

The  fast  freight  lines  operating  in  the  seventies  and  eighties 
were  very  profitable.  These  were  cooperative  freight  lines  operat- 
ing over  railroads  constituting  through  lines  from  the  west.  The 
object  of  those  organizations  was  to  enable  the  through  shipment 
of  goods  to  any  point,  however  remote,  without  breaking  bulk. 
The  Merchants'  Dispatch,  however,  was  a  non-cooperative  line. 
It  was  partnership  or  an  association  with  a  capital  of  about 
$3, 000, 000.  It  was  owned  chiefly  by  the  New  York  Central  and  its 
affiliated  railroads,  but  about  one  tenth  of  the  stock  was  owned 
by  individuals.  It  received  mileage  on  its  cars  and  commissions 
on  the  freight  which  it  handled  ranging  from  five  to  fifteen  per 
cent  of  the  freight  charge.  It  paid  dividends  of  about  forty  per 
cent  on  the  paid  up  capital.  There  was  nothing  to  prevent  all  of 
this  stock  finding  its  way  into  individual  hands.  The  organiza- 
tion was  the  subject  of  criticism  by  the  committee  and  also  of  some 
good  railroad  men  as  well. 

Excessive  mileage  rates  paid  by  the  railroads  for  sleeping  and 
drawing  room  cars  were  also  the  subject  of  strong  criticism.  The 
stock  yard  terminal  facilities  of  the  railroads  were  leased  and  con- 
trolled by  outside  interests;  and  the  whole  cattle  business  of  the 
port  of  New  York  was  pooled.  The  charges  for  yardage  and 
weighing  and  for  feed  were  declared  excessive  and  some  of  them 
were  admitted  to  be  so.  The  grain  elevator  charges  at  Buffalo 
were  found  to  be  unreasonable  and  excessive.     The  elevating  at 


142  MARTIN  S.  DECKER 

port  of  Buffalo  was  pooled,  and  in  this  pool  the  railroads  held  the 
controlling  interest.  The  outrageous  stock  and  bond  watering 
manipiilations  of  the  Erie  during  the  Fisk  and  Gould  control  and 
the  stock  dividend  m.ethods  of  increasing  the  capitalization  of  the 
New  York  Central  were  brought  out  in  the  legislative  record 
shown  to  have  been  undefended,  and  were  made  the  subject  of 
strong  condemnation. 

The  railroads  from  time  to  time  had  established  and  revised 
freight  pools,  but,  also  from  time  to  time,  discontented  railroads 
disregarded  the  pooling  agreements.  It  was  a  period  when  rate 
competition  was  still  believed  to  be  the  only  effective  weapon  of 
success  and  was  employed,  often  secretly,  to  secure  tonnage  in 
excess  of  the  road's  pooling  allotment  in  order  to  constitute  the 
basis  of  an  increased  allotment  tmder  a  demanded  revision.  When 
this  dem-and  would  fail  the  open  rate  war  usually  followed.  One 
rate  war  forced  Chicago-New  York  freight  rates  down  frcm  one 
dollar  to  ten  cents  per  hundred  pounds.  There  was,  as  there  still 
is,  great  rivalr}^  between  the  ports  of  New  York,  Boston,  Phila- 
delphia, Baltimore  and  Norfolk,  centering  chiefly  upon  the  export 
trade.  Agreements  were  made  from  time  to  time  fixing  differ- 
ential rates  for  these  ports,  with  New  York  rates  taken  as  the 
standard  upon  which  to  base  the  differentials.  These  differentials 
have  been  several  times  revised  and  fixed  by  order  of  the  Inter- 
state Ccmmierce  Comjnission,  but  they  were  then  in  1879  and  for 
years  afterwards  only  the  result  of  temporary  agreement  be- 
tween the  railroads  and  they  were  actually  departed  from  and 
varied  at  the  will  of  any  railroad  m.anager.  The  managers  of  the 
railroad  associations  were  always  intensely  anxious  to  preserve 
the  integrity  and  actual  observance  of  these  pooling  agreements, 
but  they  were  always  failing  more  less  in  their  undertaking  to 
keep  these  wild  railroad  teams  upon  the  straight  road  of  contract 
observance. 

It  required  many  years  after  the  Hepburn  Committee  reported 
in  1879,  and  many  years  of  continuing,  but  generally  futile,  effort 
on  the  part  of  the  Interstate  Commerce  Commission,  which 
organized  in  1887,  to  bring  about  actual  stability  in  rates;  and 
this  really  did  not  result  until  rigid  prohibition  of  departures  from 
published  rates  was  enacted  into  Federal  law  in  1906.  This  all 
embraced  a  period  of  about  thirty  years,  during  which  many  other 


REGULATION  OF  PUBLIC  SERVICE  143 

changes  were  made  in  Federal  regulating  laws  and  were  preparing 
the  way  for  the  1907  changes  in  our  State  law.  At  the  beginning 
of  that  thirty  year  period,  that  is  to  say,  in  the  decades  beginning 
1870,  the  large  shipping  interests  were  able  to  secure  or  dictate 
extremely  low  rates  or  extremely  large  rebates  from  open  rates, 
and  have  these  favors  confined  to  their  shipments  as  against  those 
of  smaller  competitors.  The  petroleum  oil  interests  received 
special  rates  or  rebates  ranging  from  40  cents  to  over  $3  per  barrel 
of  oil  under  agreements  made  with  trunk  line  railroads,  and  they 
not  only  received  rebates  upon  their  own  shipments  but  upon  those 
of  competing  shippers. 

The  real  business  of  the  railroads  was  evidenced  by  memoranda 
of  freight  rates  carried  in  the  pockets  of  division  freight  agents  or 
trafl5c  managers,  and  the  shipper  who  could  offer  the  most  tonnage 
over  a  given  period  usually  obtained  the  lowest  rate.  These 
larger  shippers  were  usually  able  to  secure  a  plentiful  supply  of 
freight  cars,  and  even  to  arrange  for  the  furnishing  of  only  a  small 
number  of  cars,  sometimes  practically  no  cars,  to  their  small 
competitors.  It  was  also  a  time  when  the  railroad  agents  or 
managers  could  and  did  discriminate  in  rates  and  facilities  as 
between  the  larger  shippers.  Generally  speaking,  the  railroad 
manager  was  a  business  dictator,  dispensing  prosperity  with 
royal  favor,  yet  denying  equality  and  even  the  right  of  equal 
treatment  to  the  great  mass  of  shipments,  in  point  of  number, 
throughout  the  land.  These  intolerable  conditions  were  well 
adapted  to  serve  as  the  incubator  of  the  great  industrial  trusts. 

It  was  the  time  also  when  the  railroads  as  corporations  en- 
gaged freely  in  politics.  One  prominent  railroad  man  testified, 
"In  a  Republican  district  I  was  a  RepubHcan,  in  a  Democratic 
district  I  was  a  Democrat,  in  a  doubtful  district  I  was  doubtful; 
but  I  was  always  Erie."  Free  passes  to  passengers  were  freely 
issued.  On  many  trains  out  of  Albany  the  use  of  tickets  or  cash 
fares  was  exceptional.  To  such  an  extent  was  the  legislative  and 
executive  favor  cultivated  that  conductors  would  sometimes  say 
to  a  ticket  holder:  "I  am  glad  to  find  one  man  on  this  train  who  is 
helping  to  pay  my  salary." 

Notwithstanding  the  great  ability  displayed  in  the  proceedings 
and  report  of  the  Hepburn  Railroad  Committee  of  1879  the  recom- 
mendations at  the  end  of  that  report  fell  far  short  of  the  con- 


144  MARTIN  S.  DECKER 

ception  of  necessary  regulation  which  we  all  had  in  1906,  after  the 
twenty  years  work  of  the  Interstate  Commerce  Commission  and 
when  the  Public  Service  Commissions  Law  was  first  proposed. 
The  Hepburn  Committee  was  frankly  afraid  that  rigid  supervision 
and  regulation  might  operate  to  drive  industries  from  this  State 
into  other  states,  where  no  such  regulation  had  been  established, 
and  that  fear  was  assiduously  cultivated  by  the  railroad  repre- 
sentatives. The  bill  proposed  by  the  Committee  was  so  ineffec- 
tive that  the  Commission's  powers  were  to  be  only  those  of  recom- 
mendation, and  even  that  bill  was  fought  by  the  opposing  interests 
throughout  the  years  1880  and  1881,  and  it  did  not  reach  final 
passage  until  1882. 

The  various  public  service  corporations,  railroad,  gas  and  elec- 
tric, have  passed  through  three  periods:  The  first,  during  which 
they  were  free  from  any  regulation;  the  second,  during  which  they 
were  subject  only  to  ineffective  and  rarely  applied  regulation; 
the  third,  during  which  they  have  been  actually  regulated  under 
effective  Commission  supervision,  administration,  and  orders  in 
particular  cases. 

The  railroads  and  the  gas  and  electric  corporations  of  today  are 
in  no  sense  prosperous  and  many  are  upon  the  financial  rocks. 
The  question  has  been  frequently  asked  in  recent  years:  "Is 
public  service  regulation  responsible  for  the  poverty  of  public 
service  corporations?"  One  answer  is  that  probably,  though 
no  public  service  company  executive  would  vote  for  the 
complete  repeal  of  all  regulation,  yet  all  public  service  company 
executives  would  unanimously  favor  extensive  modification  of  the 
rigors  of  present  regulation  and  regulation  practices.  There  would 
be  a  real  measure  of  protection  to  the  company  in  a  modified 
scheme  of  regulation.  The  answer  so  given  is  not  satisfactory  or 
complete  and  the  form  of  the  question  itself  is  probably  too  broad. 

The  railroads  were  prosperous  up  to  1914  but  they  were  even 
then  preparing  to  ask  approval  of  the  Interstate  Commerce  Com- 
mission to  large  freight  rate  advances,  on  account  of  actual  and 
threatened  wage  increases  to  their  men.  The  resiilt  of  that 
application  was  only  a  five  per  cent  advance  in  rates.  Later, 
with  increased  wage  payments  to  their  men  aggregating  a  large 
sum,  a  15%  advance  of  freight  rates  was  allowed.     Then,  with  the 


REGULATION  OF  PUBLIC  SERVICE  145 

war  time  operation  by  the  government,  there  were  numerous  in- 
creases in  freight  rates  and  passenger  fares.  Finally  after  the 
damage  from  government  operation  was  complete,  and  almost 
to  the  point  of  financial  wreckage,  the  roads  were  returned  to  the 
companies  with  a  heritage  of  enormous  payroll  increases.  There 
resulted  then  in  1920  the  great  40%  further  advance  in  freight 
rates,  and  to  some  extent  an  advance  in  passenger  fares,  under  a 
belated  order  of  the  Interstate  Commerce  Commission.  The 
large  rate  advance  could  have  been  much  less  if  sufficient  increases 
had  been  permitted  at  the  time  of  the  first  application. 

The  same  conditions  have  been  true  of  the  electric  railroads  in 
this  State.  With  great  increases  in  the  cost  of  their  labor  and 
material,  due  to  the  war,  and  with  the  continually  increasing 
competition  of  private  and  public  automobiles,  a  general  advance 
should  have  been  immediately  permitted  upon  presentation  of 
complaints  by  the  electric  roads,  and  legislation  to  permit  increases 
of  fare  by  the  Commission  over  so-called  local  franchise  rates 
should  have  been  passed. 

What  is  said  of  the  steam  and  electric  railways  applies  also  to 
the  gas  and  electric  companies.  The  high  cost  of  coal  and  oil 
and  labor  during  and  after  the  war  transformed  the  net  incomes  of 
many  of  these  companies  into  actual  operating  deficits,  or  only 
small  profits.  At  the  same  time  the  cost  of  borrowed  capital 
became  greatly  inflated,  so  that  often  ten  or  more  per  cent  repre- 
sented the  net  cost.  It  was  never  less  than  eight  per  cent  during 
that  period,  and  that  is  about  the  present  rate  now  for  long  time 
loans.  The  market  prices  for  first  lien  railroad  and  other  utility 
five  per  cent  bonds  often  ranged  below  seventy  per  cent  of  par,  at 
times  much  lower. 

The  real  fair  answer  to  the  question  above  stated  appears  to  be 
that  the  present  poverty  of  regulated  public  service  corporations 
is  due  not  so  much  to  regulating  laws  as  it  is  to  the  failure  of  the 
Commissions  to  take  full  and  timely  account  of  all  of  the  economic 
exigencies  pressing  upon  those  utilities.  It  is  fair  to  observe  also 
that  the  regulating  bodies  have  been  continually  btirdened  neces- 
sarily with  a  strong  sense  of  their  responsibility  to  the  general 
public,  and  that  this  has  doubtless  been  a  potent  restraining 
influence  in  the  formation  of  policies  and  resulting  determinations 


146  MARTIN  S.  DECKER 

during  the  period  of  mounting  costs  from  1916  up  to  near  the 
middle  of  the  present  year. 

As  stated  in  the  beginning,  the  present  is  the  high  tide  period  of 
complete  regulation  applied  through  the  agency  of  administrative 
commissions  to  these  public  utilities.  If  it  shall  become  manifest 
that  such  complete  regulating  methods  will  result  in  more  normal 
cost  periods  in  the  denial  of  continuous  fair  returns  upon  the 
capital  invested  in  properties  devoted  to  public  service  by  such 
corporations,  the  sense  of  justice  ever  present  in  true  public 
opinion  will  undoubtedly  sanction  and  even  demand  the  re- 
vision and  modification  of  those  methods  of  regulation.  The 
force  of  real  pubUc  opinion  rarely  stops  halfway.  Unprofitable 
public  utilities,  with  their  tremendous  total  property  investment, 
are  a  menace  to  the  prosperity  of  the  future.  In  the  end,  the 
people  must  pay  the  bill  in  a  service  so  faulty  that  all  classes  will 
combine  in  protest  and  revolt. 

Martin  S.  Decker 


■'■'?^-,.       .;'   / 


THE  HISTORY  OF  FORT  TICONDEROGA^ 

The  history  of  Fort  Ticonderoga  is  French,  English,  and,  most 
of  all,  American  history.  Indeed,  this  promontory  has  been  the 
scene  of  so  many  epoch-making  events  that  I  can  only  touch  on 
each  in  passing,  to  give  you  a  picture  of  the  whole.  Until  1609, 
Ticonderoga,  as  the  Iroquois  called  it,  was  free  of  white  adven- 
turers. Then  a  fight  between  the  Montagnais  and  Huron  Indians, 
and  their  old  foe,  the  Iroquois,  took  place  here,  with  Samuel 
Champlain  and  his  arquebus  as  the  deciding  factors.  There  was 
no  fort  here  then,  and  so  the  affair  does  not  come  within  the  scope 
of  this  paper.  It  is  enough  to  say  that  though  it  was  a  victory 
for  the  Montagnais,  it  was  a  great  loss  for  the  French,  since  it 
cost  them  forever,  the  friendship  of  the  Iroquois. 

After  this,  there  was  no  history  of  Ticonderoga  for  almost  one 
hundred  fifty  years.  Then,  with  the  stirrings  of  war  between 
France  and  England,  friction  naturally  developed  in  America 
along  the  overlapping  lines  of  the  holdings  of  both  countries. 
The  Peace  of  Utrecht,  the  English  considered,  gave  them  control 
over  the  Iroquois  country,  and  this  included  the  shores  of  Lake 
Cham-plain  for  some  distance  north  of  Crown  Point.  Notwith- 
standing this  claim,  the  French  erected  a  fort  across  from  Crown 
Point,  then  another  at  the  point  itself,  and  finally  in  1755,  they 
made  the  beginning  of  a  fort  on  the  heights  of  Ticonderoga.  That 
beginning  is  still  standing.  It  is  called  the  Grenadiers'  Battery 
now — then  it  was  Fort  Vaudreuil,  in  honor  of  the  French  governor 
of  Canada. 

During  that  year  and  the  next,  Robert  Rogers,  leader  of  the 
famous  band  of  rangers,  watched  from  Mount  Independence  and 
from  nearer  vantage  points,  the  growth  of  a  larger  fort  on  the 
heights,  back  from  the  shore  of  the  lake.  Carillon  the  French 
called  the  promontory,  "a  chime  of  bells,"  a  name  suggested  by 
the  sound  of  the  rapids  below. 

The  fort  too,  built  on  foundations  that  lasted  for  all  the  building 
that  came  afterwards,  was  called  Fort  Carillon.     Lotbini^re,  an 

^Address  delivered  at  the  Ticonderoga  session  of  the  Lake  George  meet- 
ing of  the  New  York  State  Historical  Association  October  5,  1921. 

147 


148  HELEN  IVES  GILCHRIST 

engineer  of  the  province  of  Quebec,  designed  it,  and  the  building, 
under  many  hands  was  in  process  of  construction  for  the  next 
two  years.  It  was  not  finished  when  Dieskau  came  down  past  it 
to  be  defeated  at  the  hands  of  Sir  Wilham  Johnson  and  his  Iro- 
quois, and  Dieskau's  men,  falHng  back  upon  Carillon,  in  1757, 
strengthened  the  works  there. 

In  the  summer  of  1758,  the  British  were  ready  to  attack.  They 
sent  against  Carillon,  the  largest  army  which  had  ever,  up  to  that 
time,  been  gathered  together  in  America.  It  was  under  the 
leadership  of  General  James  Abercrombie,  with  George  Augustus, 
Lord  Howe,  to  offset  his  very  obvious  lack  of  abilit3^  The  great 
French  soldier,  the  Marquis  de  Montcalm  was  the  commandant 
at  Carillon,  and  though  his  garrison  was  small,  he  decided  to 
remain  and  meet  the  attack  of  the  British.  A  skirmishing  party 
imder  Langy  was  sent  out  to  hinder  the  progress  of  the  English  in 
the  woods  between  their  landing  place  at  the  head  of  Lake  George, 
and  the  heights  of  Carillon.  With  their  first  shot,  Langy 's  men 
dealt  such  a  blow  as  insured  French  victory.  They  killed  Lord 
Howe,  "the  brains  of  the  army,"  and  left  the  management  of  the 
great  British  force,  to  Abercrombie  alone. 

Then,  while  Abercrombie  sat  disconsolate,  at  the  old  French 
sawmill  two  miles  below  the  fort,  Montcalm's  men  spent  two  days 
in  digging  great  zigzag  lines  of  intrenchments  through  the  woods. 
Trees  were  felled,  and  some  of  them  were  dragged  into  position 
with  their  branches  facing  out  from  the  trenches,  so  that  while 
only  the  occasional  top  of  a  silver-edged  black  tri comer  hat,  re- 
vealed the  French,  their  foes,  should  they  attack  through  the 
woods,  would  be  held  almost  as  fixed  targets  in  the  tree  branches. 
An  infantry  attack  against  such  a  defense,  was  by  foregone  con- 
clusion, destined  to  failure,  but  on  the  morning  of  the  eighth  of 
July,  Abercrombie  gave  his  order  for  just  such  an  attack.  The 
British  infantry,  unaided  by  any  artillery  either  in  the  woods  or 
from  Mount  Independence  where  Sir  William  Johnson  held  his 
Iroquois  in  reserve,  were  sent  in  good  marching  order,  left,  center, 
and  right,  straight  upon  destruction. 

When  word  was  brought  to  Abercrombie,  down  at  the  sawmill, 
that  the  attack  had  failed,  he  only  said,  "Let  them  attack  again." 
There  were  six  such  attacks  made  against  the  French  in  their  tree 
defenses,  that  afternoon,  and  then,  finally,  Abercrombie  realized 


HISTORY  OF  FORT  TICONDEROGA  149 

that  his  idea  had  failed,  and  he  gave  an  order  for  retreat.  He 
had  lost  some  of  his  best  troops.  The  Black  Watch  had  left  so 
many  of  their  men  on  the  field  that  the  old  chronicler,  Stewart  of 
Garth,  reports  that  the  regiment  could  not  be  used  again  that 
year.  A  panic  seized  the  retreating  British,  despite  the  bravery 
of  their  fight  against  impossible  odds,  and  they  fled  so  hurriedly 
that  the  French  reported  the  finding  of  thousands  of  British  shoes 
in  the  mud  about  the  embarking  place,  next  day. 

In  the  summer  of  1759,  the  English  attacked  again,  this  time 
imder  Sir  Jeffery  Amherst,  a  cautious  soldier  who  took  elaborate 
pains  not  to  repeat  Abercrombie's  blunders.  The  French  were 
in  wretched  condition  that  year.  Montcalm  himself  was  needed 
at  Quebec  to  defend  the  city  against  General  James  Wolfe.  Louis 
and  the  Pompadour  had  grown  a  little  indifferent  to  the  game  of 
war,  and  Governor  Vaudreuil,  following  their  example,  had  let 
graft  and  petty  enmities  undermine  the  conduct  of  the  campaign. 
General  Bourlamarque,  the  commandant  at  Carillon,  withdrew, 
under  orders  from  Canada,  at  the  approach  of  Amherst,  but  he 
left  Hebecourt  with  four  hundred  men  to  retard  Amherst  as  long  as 
possible,  in  his  progress  north  toward  Wolfe  and  Quebec.  The 
four  hundred  seem  to  have  been  ample  for  the  purpose.  Amherst 
brought  up  his  artillery,  moved  into  the  old  French  lines  of  the 
year  before,  and  proceeded  to  erect  batteries  as  though  he  knew 
nothing  of  the  French  withdrawal.  For  two  days,  the  British 
worked  at  their  fortification  of  the  heights,  and  then,  on  the  third 
morning,  as  they  were  about  to  attack,  there  was  a  tremendous 
explosion,  and  the  powder  magazine  went  into  the  air.  The 
little  garrison  was  found  to  be  making  its  way  to  the  lake  and 
boarding  ships  to  make  good  its  escape.  Amherst's  men  followed 
and  captured  some  of  the  ships,  but  the  greater  part  of  the  four 
hundred  reached  Isle  aux  Noix  safely,  where  they  joined  Bour- 
lamarque and  remained  a  hindrance  to  the  further  advance  of  the 
British  towards  Quebec. 

During  the  next  few  months,  the  fort  at  Ticonderoga,  as  well  as 
the  one  at  Crown  Point,  was  put  into  the  best  condition  it  has 
ever  been  in.  Sir  Jeffery  Amherst,  in  his  letter  to  Pitt  and  the 
king,  stated  that  the  fort  was  Httle  damaged  by  the  explosion,  and 
that  he  intended  to  repair  the  place  quite  on  its  original  lines,  in 
order  to  be  ready  for  the  French  if  they  should  come  up  the  lake 


150  HELEN  IVES  GILCHRIST 

again.  But  the  French  never  came.  The  fall  of  Quebec  practically 
ended  the  long  drawn  out  wars.  Carillon  had  become  Ticon- 
deroga  forever. 

Then  there  was  an  uneasy  peace  upon  the  land  for  the  next 
fifteen  years.  The  Biitish  kept  but  a  small  garrison  at  Ticon- 
deroga.  It  had  become  a  place  to  live,  but  there  is  little  record  of 
its  life.  We  know  that  Major  Gavin  Cochrane  held  command 
here  for  four  years,  and  that  the  garrison  was  simimoned  hastily 
to  New  York  City  once  to  aid  in  suppressing  the  Stamp  Act  riots. 
We  know  that  Captain  Delaplace,  the  last  commandant  before  the 
Revolution,  was  famous  for  his  dinners  of  rattlesnake  soup,  but 
no  fighting  occured  to  make  historical  the  name  of  any  command- 
ant of  the  fort  in  that  inter-war  period.  It  is  typical  of  the  quiet 
that  had  fallen  on  the  place,  that  when  Ethan  Allen  came  in  May 
of  1775,  he  roused  the  garrison  from  a  sleep  which,  so  far  as  history 
is  concerned,  might  have  been  going  on  for  the  past  fifteen  years. 

Allen's  attack  is  too  well  known  for  us  to  linger  over  it  here. 
It  was  through  the  wicket  gate  in  the  great  south  wall  that  he  led 
his  eighty-three  Green  Mountain  boys.  With  Benedict  Arnold 
at  his  side,  he  entered  this  barrack  square  and  then,  Nathan 
Beman  leading,  he  came  to  Captain  Delaplace's  door  in  the  south 
barrack  and  demanded  surrender  "In  the  name  of  Jehovah  and  the 
Continental  Congress."  Private  Rice  of  the  Continental  army 
says  that  Allen  backed  his  demand  with  something  stronger  than 
that.  To  anyone  who  is  familiar  with  the  easy,  unheated  pro- 
fanity of  the  Vermont  countryside  to-day,  the  story  is  not  in- 
credible. 

Allen  remained  at  the  fort  as  commandant  only  a  very  short 
time.  He  was  succeeded  by  Benedict  Arnold  who,  in  turn,  was 
removed  after  a  few  weeks.  The  Albany  Committee  of  Safety 
sent  in  guns  from  the  Albany  arsenal  to  replace  those  taken  by 
Knox  down  to  Boston,  and  a  New  York  regiment  came  in  as 
garrison.  The  British  made  no  attempt  to  retake  Ticonderoga 
that  year,  and  no  active  garrisoning  of  the  fort  was  required 

In  the  summer  of  1776,  however,  matters  had  changed.  There 
were  constant  rumors  of  invasion  from  Canada,  and  the  garrison 
was  increased  to  3100  men.  These  were  divided  into  four  brigades 
under  General  Benedict  Arnold,  Colonel  Reed,  Colonel  John 
Stark,  and  Colonel  Arthur  St.  Clair.     The  nucleus  of  the  garrison 


HISTORY  OF  FORT  TICONDEROGA  151 

was  Cornelius  Wynkoop's  New  York  regiment.  Then  there  were 
1,600  Pennsylvania  troops,  and  the  rest  were  chiefly  New  England- 
ers. 

The  life  of  the  garrison  was  most  interesting,  that  summer. 
Sectional  feeling  ran  high,  Mad  Anthony  Wayne's  Pennsylvania 
regiment  fought  Colonel  Whitcomb's  New  Englanders  to  a  bloody 
finish  over  the  location  of  a  shoemaker's  bench.  Benedict  Arnold's 
broken  little  army  drifted  down  from  Quebec  and  stopped  long 
enough  at  Crown  Point  for  four  himdred  of  them  to  die  there. 
The  rest  came  on  presently  to  Ticonderoga  and  fitted  languidly 
into  the  life  of  the  garrison.  Colonel  Thaddeus  Kosciuscko  and 
his  construction  gangs  were  busy  erecting  a  star  fort  and  other 
works  on  Mount  Independence  across  the  lake.  Colonel  John- 
athan  Trumbull  advised  the  fortifjang  of  Mount  Defiance,  a  mile 
to  the  south-west  of  Ticonderoga,  at  the  same  time,  but  unfortun- 
ately, his  advice  was  not  heeded.  One  New  England  regiment  had 
brought  a  few  brass  and  reed  musical  instruments  with  them,  but 
their  music  came  to  a  sudden  end  when  the  Continental  Congress 
requisitioned  the  instruments  and  ordered  them  sent  to  Phila- 
delphia. The  independent  company  of  Stockbridge  Indians 
brought  here  for  scouting  purposes  became  so  very  independent 
that  they  had  to  be  dismissed  and  sent  home.  General  Benedict 
Arnold  quarreled  with  Colonel  Moses  Hazen  and  ordered  him 
courtmartialed.  Then  he  took  on  the  entire  court  in  a  quarrel  for 
acquitting  the  colonel.  From  this  noisy  business,  he  was  suddenly 
catapulted  by  General  Gates  into  command  of  the  little  fleet  of 
ships  which  had  been  built  to  meet  Sir  Guy  Carleton  on  the  lake. 

For  the  British  really  were  coming  at  last.  Their  fleet  under 
Captain  Pringle  was  manned  by  seven  hundred  men,  and  against 
them,  Arnold  took  a  motley  fleet  whose  crews  consisted  of  three 
hundred-odd  sea-going  landsmen.  They  met  off  Valcour  Island, 
and  the  fight  lasted  through  an  afternoon.  Arnold  was  defeated, 
but  the  British  postponed  seizing  his  ships  until  the  next  day. 
That  night  they  stationed  a  line  of  ships  across  the  lake,  and 
even  set  afire  one  of  their  own  dismantled  ships,  in  order  to  keep 
watch  of  Arnold's  battered  little  ships.  Yet,  in  the  morning, 
they  were  gone.  The  British  have  left  on  record  their  mystification 
over  that  retreat,  but  General  Wilkinson  in  his  Memoirs  has  ex- 
plained Arnold's  manoeuvre,  a  feat  carried  through  with  that 


152  HELEN  IVES  GILCHRIST 

futile  bravery  which  was  so  characteristic  of  all  his  Revolutionary 
record.  He  stationed  his  ships  in  line  two  to  three  hundred 
yards  apart,  each  with  a  lantern  under  the  stem,  so  masked  as  to 
be  invisible  except  to  the  ship  directly  behind.  Then,  in  the  fog, 
the  Trumbull  leading,  and  Arnold  himself  bringing  up  the  rear, 
the  whole  fleet  slipped  noiselessly  through  that  watching  and  un- 
seeing line  stretched  out  across  the  lake. 

In  the  morning,  the  British  puisued  and,  overtaking  Arnold's 
fleet  at  noon,  continued  the  battle.  Most  of  the  American  fleet 
was  lost  in  the  fight,  but  Arnold  succeeded  in  bringing  off  his 
crews  safely,  to  Ticonderoga,  and  the  three  ships  which  were 
left  to  him,  were  docked  at  the  foot  of  the  hill  below  the  fort — 
the  Trumbull,  the  Enterprise  and  the  Revenge. 

This  was  the  only  military  and  naval  action  of  the  year  at  Ticon- 
deroga. Carleton,  whose  troops  had  followed  his  transports 
down,  came  no  nearer  than  Crown  Point.  The  fight  had  taken 
place  in  October  and  had  given  the  British  a  fair  idea  of  the  op- 
position to  be  met.  Carleton  felt  that  his  force  was  unequal  to 
that  opposing  him,  and  that  the  lateness  of  the  season  was  a 
disadvantage  to  an  invading  army.  Consequently,  he  withdrew 
to  Canada,  and  soon  after.  Gates  dismissed  the  militia  from 
Ticonderoga,  and  left  to  join  Washington's  army. 

In  1777,  Arthtir  St.  Clair,  now  a  general,  was  the  fort  com- 
mandant. This  time,  there  was  no  continual  cry  of  "Wolf! 
Wolf!"  The  British  came,  Burgoyne  and  Powell  leading  them. 
Their  first  move  was  to  seize  Moimt  Defiance,  and  Powell,  eyeing 
it,  made  a  famous  remark: 

"Where  a  goat  can  go,  a  man  can  go,"  he  said,  "and  where  a 
man  can  go,  he  can  pull  a  gun  up  after  him." 

St.  Clair's  garrison  was  not  in  good  condition,  but  they  were 
ready  to  meet  an  attack  if  it  should  come  by  way  of  the  woods  to 
the  north,  and  there  was  also  a  garrison  on  Mount  Independence. 
However,  when  he  found  that  British  batteries  had  been  placed  on 
Mount  Defiance,  he  called  a  coimcil  and  gave  the  order  for  im- 
mediate withdrawal  from  the  fort.  The  British  pursued  and 
fought  a  sharp  battle  with  the  rear  guard  under  Seth  Warner,  but 
the  main  body  of  Americans  reached  Castleton  safely.  St.  Clair 
was  courtmartialed  for  thus  giving  up  the  position.  He  was 
acquitted,  but  General  Schyuler,  his  superior  officer,  innocent  as 


HISTORY  OF  FORT  TICONDEROGA  153 

he  was  of  any  connection  with  the  order  to  withdraw,  lost  his 
command  chiefly  because  of  St.  Clair's  action. 

Later  that  siimmer,  Colonel  Brown  of  Massachusetts  aided  by 
Colonel  Seth  Warner,  Colonel  Woodbridge  and  Colonel  Ebenezer 
Allen,  made  a  desperate  attempt  to  recapture  Ticonderoga. 
They  did  succeed  in  getting  possession  of  Mount  Independence, 
of  the  woods  to  the  north,  and  of  Mount  Defiance,  but  when 
Powell  was  called  upon  to  surrender,  he  replied,  "The  garrison 
entrusted  to  my  charge,  I  shall  defend  to  the  last."  And  presently, 
the  Americans,  unprepared  for  a  long  siege,  withdrew  after  sinking 
Arnold's  ships  moored  at  the  dock  below. 

Powell  did  retreat  later,  after  Burgoyne's  surrender  at  Saratoga 
had  made  his  position  at  Ticonderoga  untenable,  and  once  more 
the  fort  fell  into  American  hands.  This  time,  no  garrison  was 
sent  in.  The  Continental  army  was  small  and  in  a  desperate 
condition  that  year,  and  though  frequent  appeals  were  made  by 
Vermonters  to  Congress,  no  troops  were  supplied. 

It  was  at  this  juncture  that  several  Vermonters  felt  that  some- 
thing must  be  done  independent  of  Congress  to  protect  Vermont's 
frontier.  The  action  they  took  was  always  a  matter  kept  secret 
from  the  Vermont  people  as  a  whole.  A  commission  was  formed, 
with  Ethan  and  Ira  Allen,  and  Governor  Chittenden  as  its  leaders. 
Vermont  was  not  at  that  time  one  of  the  United  States.  Her 
land  was  claimed  by  New  York  and  New  Hampshire,  and  her 
requests  to  be  admitted  to  the  Union  had  been  refused,  except 
on  the  condition  that  the  give  up  her  identity  and  enter  as  part  of 
the  two  states  which  claimed  her  territory.  In  1780,  Ira  Allen 
met  with  the  British  to  consider  their  proposal  of  erecting  Vermont 
into  an  independent  province  or  of  defending  her  as  a  British 
province.  Major-general  Haldimand  of  the  British  army  brought 
a  force  of  men  into  Ticonderoga,  and  here  secret  meetings  were 
held  with  the  Vermont  Commission.  Then  Carleton  came  to 
Ticonderoga;  and  the  meetings  went  on,  but  never  at  any  time, 
did  the  Commission  agree  to  terms,  except  that  they  did  demand 
from  Carleton  a  truce  which  should  keep  Veimont  and  northern 
New  York  free  from  invasion.  Carleton  withdrew  to  Canada 
shortly  after  Benedict  Arnold's  attempt  to  betray  West  Point 
had  failed,  and  General  Barry  St.  Leger  came  down  from  Canada 
in  1781,  took  up  his  position  at  Ticonderoga  and  continued  the 


154  HELEN  IVES  GILCHRIST 

efforts  to  come  to  a  definite  understanding  with  the  Vennont 
Commission.  Finally,  Washington's  victory  over  Comwallis  at 
Yorktown  put  an  end  to  all  negotiations  except  those  leading  to 
the  recognition  of  the  United  States  of  America. 

With  the  withdrawal  of  St.  Leger,  the  military  life  of  the  old 
fort  came  to  an  end.  Only  a  few  years  later,  it  had  fallen  into 
ruin.  The  stone  of  the  great  wall  was  being  used  by  settlers 
with  houses  to  raise.  The  land  of  the  promontory,  the  very  fort 
itself,  were  made  a  state  grant  to  Union  and  Colirmbia  Colleges, 
and  from  them,  WilHam  F.  Pell  obtained  it  in  1806.  Mr.  Pell 
was  the  grandson  of  the  last  lord  of  Pelham  Manor.  His  father's 
brother  had  come  into  the  fort  in  1777  with  Buigoyne's  army. 
This  first  private  owner  of  the  fort  stopped  the  depredations 
which  were  destro3dng  it,  and  fenced  in  the  old  redoubts  so  that 
even  to-day,  they  may  be  readily  traced  along,  the  shore  and 
through  the  woods.  The  property  had  fallen  into  good  hands, 
and  by  inheritance,  it  has  remained  in  them.  The  grandson  of 
Mr.  William  F.  Pell,  Mr.  S.  H.  P.  Pell,  has  carried  preservation 
into  the  more  active  work  of  restoration.  He  and  his  wife  have 
made  their  home  in  the  old  house  of  William  F.  Pell  and  have 
busied  themselves  with  the  rebtiilding  of  the  great  wall,  restoring 
the  west  barracks  and  in  gathering  into  a  museum,  relics  of  the 
great  soldiers  who  made  history  here.  The  old  flagship  of  Bene- 
dict Arnold  has  been  raised,  guns  of  the  period  have  been  mounted 
in  their  old  positions,  so  that  the  fort  once  more  possesses  some- 
thing of  the  life  and  stir  it  knew  in  the  days  of  its  glory  as  the 
frontier  of  an  empire  and  the  symbol  of  the  independence  of  a 
nation. 

Helen  Ives  Gilchrist 


WOMEN  OF  NEW  YORK  STATE  IN 
THE  REVOLUTION^ 

When  I  was  asked  to  write  a  paper  for  this  occasion  on  the 
participation  of  Women  in  the  Revolution — principally  those  of 
our  own  state— I  had  no  idea  of  the  interest,  the  pride,  the  sym- 
pathy, and  finally  the  thankfulness  that  were  to  be  my  com- 
panions as  I  delved  into  the  pages  of  history.  A  celebrated 
writer  has  well  said : 

"The  poet  may  say  or  sing,  not  as  things  are,  but  as  they  ought 
to  have  been;  but  the  historian  must  pen  them,  not  as  they 
ought  to  have  been,  but  as  they  really  are,  without  adding  to  or 
diminishing  anything  from  the  Truth.  History  is  a  sacred  kind 
of  writing  because  Truth  is  essential  to  it." 

It  is  to  be  regretted  that  the  eighteenth,  nineteenth,  and  even 
twentieth  century  histories  written  by  men  up  to  the  present 
time,  contain  little  information  regarding  the  part  played  by 
women  in  the  War  for  Independence.  It  has  remained  for  women 
historians  to  perform  this  loving  tribute.  While  the  Revolution 
was  in  progress,  Mercy  Warren  of  Massachusetts  wrote  its  history, 
but  said  very  little  of  what  women  as  individuals  were  accom- 
plishing in  their  limited  home  sphere — although  she  voiced  the 
spirit  of  the  times  when  she  wiote — "Be  it  known  unto  Britain 
even  American  daughters  are  poHticians  and  patriots,  and  will  aid 
the  good  work  with  their  feeble  efforts." 

Nearly  seventy-five  years  elapsed  before  the  remarkable  as- 
sembling of  facts  and  anecdotes  by  Elizabeth  F.  EUet  in  her 
history  of  the  "Women  of  the  Revolution"  was  presented  to  an 
appreciative  public.  Fortunately,  the  events  were  not  so  far  in 
the  distant  past  but  that  material  cotild  be  gathered  from  at  least 
the  second  generation  of  relatives  and  friends  whose  narratives 
were  deemed  authentic;  also  from  the  few  letters  that  were  in 
existence.  It  must  be  remembered  that  in  those  days  postal 
facilities  were  very  meager,  and  the  art  of  writing  was  known 
only  to  the  better  educated  women.     News  was  carried  by  stage 


*An  address  delivered  at  the    Lake   George    meeting   of   the   New  York 
State  Historical  Association,  October  4,  1921. 


156 


156  AMELIA  DAY  CAMPBELL 

coach,  messenger,  and  the  favorite  and  popular  method — the 
spoken  word.  During  the  past  seventy  and  more  years  many 
other  women  have  written  valuable  histories  of  those  women,  one 
of  especial  interest  being  by  the  Greens. 

To  the  Daughters  of  the  American  Revolution  we  owe  a  debt  of 
gratitude  for  their  noble  work  in  bringing  to  light  many  data 
concerning  the  lives  and  deeds  of  those  unrecorded  women,  by 
giving  their  names  to  their  various  chapters,  memorializing  them 
on  tablets  and  stones,  and  by  thus  writing  their  names  permanently 
on  history's  page. 

Wom.en  were  more  than  "silent  partners"  of  their  hero  hus- 
bands, sons  and  fathers,  for  in  most  households  they  were,  as 
now,  the  "power  behind  the  throne,"  and  in  their  great  desire  for 
freedom  they  urged  their  men  to  espouse  the  cause  of  the  Revolu- 
tion. The  faith  with  which  the  men  left  their  large  families  to  the 
already  over-burdened  care  of  wives  and  mothers  was  a  tribute  to 
the  efficiency  of  those  women,  and  their  unfailing  cotuage. 

It  m.ust  not  be  forgotten  that  New  York  had  been  in  the  posses- 
sion of  the  British  since  1664.  For  one  hundred  years  its  people 
had  been  British  subjects,  and  in  taking  sides  with  the  Revolu- 
tionary cause  they  became  rebels  to  their  king.  The  women 
were  divided  in  their  allegiance  to  the  two  causes  as  well  as  the 
men,  and  it  som.etimes  happened  that  they  were  against  the  men 
of  their  own  household  who  were  not  on  the  side  of  Liberty. 

New  York  State  women  were  as  actively  identified  with  hazar- 
dous war  work  as  were  the  women  of  some  of  the  other  colonies, 
and  their  faith  was  stiong  in  the  righteousness  of  the  cause,  and 
they  believed  it  must  succeed.  They  encouraged  and  expected 
their  men  to  enlist,  and  were  inspired  by  the  knowledge  that  if 
their  loved  ones  fell,  as  many  must,  it  would  be  for  their  country's 
freedom. 

American  women  have  recently  known  the  sorrows  and  despairs 
attendant  upon  parting  with  their  loved  ones  who  went  overseas 
to  fight  for  world  freedom,  but  imlike  those  Revolutionary  mothers, 
we  did  not  know  the  terrors  of  invasion,  which  are  therefore  be- 
yond our  most  vivid  imaginations.  In  that  Revolutionary 
struggle  "the  Hessians — a  hired  army — ^instituted  a  reign  of  terror, 
debauchery  and  cruelty,"  and  in  the  light  of  recent  war  tragedies 
we  can  pretty  accurately  judge  just  what  that  means. 


WOMEN  IN  THE  REVOLUTION  157 

The  four  wars  that  preceded  the  Revolution — King  William's, 
Queen  Anne's,  King  George's,  and  the  seven-year  French  and 
Indian  War  with  its  bloody  battlefields  of  Ticonderoga,  Lake 
George,  Fort  Edward  and  Fort  Niagara,  had  bred  the  necessity 
of  fighting  for  protection  and  self-preservation  in  the  breasts  of  the 
colonists,  and  had  raised  up  leaders  such  as  George  Washington, 
Philip  Schuyler  and  others.  When  the  Stamp  Act  was  declared 
by  the  British  to  help  pay  for  this  last  war  and  the  upkeep  of 
their  soldiers  on  our  soil,  and  a  tax  was  put  on  tea,  the  colonists 
rebelled  and  determined  to  fight  for  their  own  rights. 

The  women  were  the  first  to  asseit  themselves  by  refusing  to 
drink  tea  or  peimit  any  article  of  British  importation  in  their 
homes.  Mrs.  John  Adams  voiced  their  sentiment  when  she 
wrote  to  Mrs.  Warren — "The  Tea,  that  baneful  weed,  is  arrived; 
great,  and  I  hope  effectual  opposition  has  been  made  to  the  land- 
ing." This  opposition  was  indeed  effectual  when  the  tea  was 
dumped  into  Boston  harbor  and  the  colonists  were  committed  to  war. 

If  the  British  had  been  more  zealous  in  carrying  on  their  war- 
fare, the  outcome  might  have  been  far  different.  The  battle  of 
Long  Island,  in  which  they  were  victorious,  might  have  been  the 
turning  point  of  the  war  in  their  favor,  had  they  prevented  the 
American  army's  successful  retreat  across  the  river  in  the  night. 
But  these  hired  soldiers  under  a  German-British  King,  were  not 
fighting  for  liberty  of  country,  freedom  of  speech,  and  sanctity 
of  their  homes  as  were  the  colonists.  They  had  not  their  de- 
termination of  purpose,  as  was  shown  in  John  Hancock's  letter  to 
his  wife  in  which  he  voiced  also  true  appreciation  of  American 
womanhood,  when  he  said — "I  do  not  believe  the  Howes  have 
very  great  wives;  if  they  had  we  should  have  suffered  more  from 
their  exertions  than  we  do.  A  smart  wife  would  have  put  Howe 
in  possession  of  Philadelphia  long  ago." 

One  of  the  humane  heritages  to  mankind  from  that  war  is  the 
Red  Cross  organization  of  today.  Its  work  was  unwittingly  be- 
gun by  Martha  Washington  when  she  arrived  at  her  husband's 
camp  after  each  campaign  and  proceeded  to  aid  the  sick  and 
wounded.  Her  proud  boast  was  that  she  had  "heard  the  first 
cannon  at  the  beginning  and  the  last  at  the  ending  of  every  cam- 
paign diiring  the  Revolution."  Mercy  Warren  correctly  de- 
scribed her  when  she  wrote:  "The  Complaicancy  of  her  manners 


158  AMELIA  DAY  CAMPBELL 

speaks  at  once  the  benevolence  of  her  heart;  and  her  affability, 
candor  and  gentleness,  qualify  her  to  soften  the  hours  of  private 
life,  or  to  sweeten  the  cares  of  the  Hero,  and  smooth  the  rugged 
paths  of  war," — for  this  was  what  Martha  Washington  did  at 
Newburgh,  Peekskill  and  New  York.  During  the  terrible  winter 
at  Valley  Forge  when  the  aimy  was  freezing,  starving  and  clothed 
in  tatters,  in  desperation  she  enlisted  the  wives  of  Washington's 
generals— Lucy  Knox,  Catherine  Gieene  and  Sarah  Livingston 
Stirling — and  they  gave  from  their  own  private  funds  unsparingly, 
and  appealed  to  the  women  of  the  State  who  generously  responded. 
From  this  fund  they  made  with  their  own  hands  thousands  of 
shirts  for  the  soldiers,  many  of  whom  owed  much  bodily  comfort 
and  even  life  itself  to  their  untiring  devotions.  This  was  the  be- 
ginning of  war  relief  which  was  carried  to  the  very  battlefields 
dimng  the  Civil  War  by  Clara  Barton,  and  is  now  the  world-wide 
Red  Cross. 

In  direct  contrast  to  Martha  Washington  and  her  helpfulness, 
is  the  story  of  Mary  Philipse,  who  had  been  the  object  of  Wash- 
ington's admiration  and  court  before  he  met  Martha  Custis; 
but  Miss  Philipse  married  Roger  Morris,  a  royalist  who  fought 
with  the  British,  and  eventually  she  and  her  husband  became 
outlaws.  She  was  heiress  to  her  father's  magnificent  estate  on 
the  Hudson,  and  it  was  there  that  she  and  her  husband  entertained 
the  traitor  Benedict  Arnold  and  assisted  him  to  escape  after  be- 
traying his  country.  This  estate  and  also  the  home  that  Roger 
Morris  built  for  her  on  Haarlem.  Heights,  afterwards  Washington 
Heights,  and  used  by  Washington  as  headquarters,  were  even- 
tually confiscated.  This  historic  house  became  the  Jumel  Man- 
sion when  purchased  by  Stephen  Jiunel,  a  French  wine  merchant, 
and  presented  to  his  wife. 

Madam  Jumel  had  a  brilHant  career  both  at  home  and  in 
Europe.  She  was  present  at  the  first  session  of  Congress  in  1774, 
and  at  Washington's  inauguration.  Because  of  her  wit  and 
chann  she  numbered  am.ong  her  friends  and  admirers  such  well- 
known  historic  personages  as  Benjamin  Franklin,  General  Knox, 
Lafayette,  Patrick  Henry  and  Thomas  Jefferson.  At  a  dinner 
party  in  this  famous  m.ansion  during  her  widowhood,  Aaron 
Bvirr,  who  was  one  of  the  guests  said,  in  taking  her  to  dinner: 
"I  give  you  my  hand,  madam.     My  heart  has  long  been  yours." 


WOMEN  IN  THE  REVOLUTION  159 

They  were  married  after  his  persistent  wooing,  but  separated 
after  a  few  months  of  unhappiness.  This  Jumel  mansion  in 
which  she  died  at  the  age  of  96,  now  belongs  to  New  York  City, 
but  is  cared  for  by  the  Daughters  of  the  American  Revolution 
and  contains  interesting  reHcs  of  the  Revolutionary  period. 

You  are  familiar  with  the  early  history  of  New  York  and  its 
settlement  by  the  Dutch — those  industrious,  substantial  people 
who  came  from  Holland  and  established  two  colonies  soon  after 
Hudson  came  in  1609.  They  bought  large  tracts  of  land  from 
New  York  to  Albany  and  brought  over  their  countrymen  to 
colonize  them,  over  whom  they  had  entire  jurisdiction.  These 
feudal  lords  or  "patroons,"  became  very  wealthy  and  powerful, 
and  their  names  are  interwoven  with  the  very  character  itself  of 
our  State.  Counties,  towns  and  streets  bear  their  names  of 
Van  Rensselaer,  Van  Cortlandt,  Stuyvesant,  Ten  Broeck,  and 
many  others.  Their  descendants  have  ever  been  loyal  to  our 
country,  foremost  in  civic  aflaiis,  charitable  in  deeds,  and  patri- 
otic in  all  wars.  As  ofhcers  and  patriots  they  fought  in  the 
Revolution,  and  the  women  as  well  were  patriots — and  heroines. 

A  descendant  of  one  of  the  "patroons"  was  Cornelia  Van  Cort- 
landt, who  after  her  marriage  to  Gerard  Beekman  resided  on  the 
street  now  bearing  their  name  in  New  York  City.  The  country 
place  of  her  father,  Pierre  Van  Cortlandt,  was  near  Peekskill 
where  they  returned  during  the  war.  Many  interesting  stories 
are  told  of  Mrs.  Beekman's  bravery  when  threatened  by  the 
enemy,  and  her  courage  usually  shamed  them  into  leaving  her 
home  and  possessions  unmolested.  Her  hospitality  was  bound- 
less, for  their  wealth  was  great,  and  General  Washington  and  his 
cflficers  were  frequently  entertained  by  them  when  his  troops 
were  encam.ped  near  Peekskill.  To  Mrs.  Beekman  was  due  the 
credit  of  thwarting  Major  Andres  attempt  to  escape  through  the 
American  lines,  by  refusing  to  give  up  a  valise  which  had  been  left 
for  safe-keeping  by  one  of  Washington's  aides,  and  which  con- 
tained an  American  uniform  and  considerable  gold.  Several 
weeks  elapsed  when  a  neighbor,  suspected  of  being  a  royalist 
syrr-pathizer,  rode  up  and  asked  for  the  valise.  Mrs.  Beekman 
dem.anded  his  written  order,  as  she  had  been  requested  not  to 
give  it  up  without  one.  Of  course  he  had  none,  and  much  to  his 
anger  she  refused  to  let  him  have  the  valise.     Andrd  was  at  the 


160  AMELIA  DAY  CAMPBELL 

time  in  the  neighbor's  home  waiting  for  means  to  escape,  and  in 
an  American  imiform  would  undoubtedly  have  succeeded. 

Probably  no  incident  of  the  war  showed  greater  patriotism  and 
determination  than  the  setting  fire  to  her  husband's  broad  acres 
of  grain  on  their  estate  near  Saratoga  by  Catherine  Van  Rens- 
selaer Schuyler — (descended  from  the  patroon  of  Greenbush) — 
for  food  was  scarce,  supplies  hard  to  get,  and  continental  money 
was  not  desired  by  those  who  had  supplies  to  sell.  She  was  the 
wife  of  General  Philip  Schuyler  who  commanded  the  Northern 
Army.  It  was  expected  that  the  British  army  under  Burgoyne 
was  about  to  take  Saratoga,  and  rather  than  permit  his  army  to 
be  fed  with  their  grain,  Mrs.  Schuyler  set  fire  to  it  with  her  own 
hands.  Their  winter  home  was  in  Albany,  and  the  mansion  had 
been  built  when  her  husband  was  in  Europe  on  diplomatic  busi- 
ness, in  order  to  give  employment  to  the  men  of  the  town  who 
needed  it.  It  was  here  that  the  Schuylers  entertained  Burgoyne 
and  his  staff  on  their  march  south  after  their  defeat  at  Saratoga, 
when  as  prisoners  of  war  they  stopped  over  night.  This  and 
other  equally  generous  treatment  of  their  enemies  "proved  that 
at  sight  of  the  misfortunes  of  others,  they  quickly  forgot  their 
own." 

On  General  Burgoyne's  staff  was  Baron  de  Riedesel  who  com- 
manded the  Brunswick  forces.  His  young  wife,  daughter  of  the 
Prussian  prime  minister,  with  her  three  children,  had  embraced 
the  fortunes  and  misfortunes  of  war  when  she  followed  her  husband 
to  be  with  him  in  his  campaigns.  She  was  in  camp  with  him  at 
Fort  Edward,  and  when  he  was  made  prisoner  at  the  Battle  of 
Saratoga,  he  sent  for  her  to  join  him.  Of  that  experience  she 
related  in  letters  to  her  family  across  the  water — "As  we  passed 
through  the  American  camp  nobody  treated  us  with  disrespect, 
but  on  the  contrary  seemed  touched  at  the  sight  of  a  captive  mother 
with  three  children." 

It  was  on  this  occasion  that  she  was  befriended  by  General 
Schuyler,  who  invited  her  and  her  children  to  visit  his  family  in 
Albany,  which  then  was  two  days  journey  from  Saratoga.  Mrs. 
Schuyler's  hospitality  was  given  unstintingly  to  this  German 
baroness  and  her  husband,  and  they  remained  in  luxury  imtil  their 
trip  was  resiimed. 

Perhaps  at  this  distant  day  we  should  be  as  lenient  in  our 


WOMEN  IN  THE  REVOLUTION  161 

judgment  of  Margaret  Moncrieffe,  the  spy,  as  were  the  officers  of 
the  American  forces  that  she  sought  to  betray.  Their  attitude 
may  have  been  due  to  her  youth,  or  her  beauty,  or  because  she 
would  be  expected  to  espouse  the  cause  of  her  parent  who  was  a 
prominent  officer  with  the  British  forces.  At  any  rate,  this  latter 
consideration  was  not  thought  of  when  she  was  visiting  in  the 
home  of  an  American  officer  near  Peekskill  where  she  met  other 
officers  constantly.  Because  of  the  prominence  of  her  host  and 
hostess,  she  attracted  the  court  and  homage  of  these  young  men, 
who  supposing  her  as  patriotic  to  the  Revolutionary  cause  as 
themselves,  discussed  with  her  and  in  her  presence,  important 
army  affairs,  which  should  have  been  kept  secret.  No  doubt 
they  blamed  themselves  for  their  indiscretion  when  sitting  in 
judgment  on  her  case  later  on.  On  her  daily  horseback  rides 
which  she  always  preferred  to  take  alone,  she  was  in  the  habit  of 
dropping  a  note  at  a  secluded  place,  which  was  immediately 
picked  up  by  a  British  soldier  secreted  beside  the  road  for  that 
purpose,  and  conveyed  to  British  headquarters.  This  went  on 
for  some  time,  till  one  day  Miss  Moncrieffe  was  thrown  from  her 
horse  and  picked  up  insensible.  When  she  regained  consciousness 
at  the  house  of  a  neighbor  and  found  her  vest  had  been  open  to 
give  her  air,  she  became  alarmed  on  discovering  that  her  letter  was 
no  longer  in  its  hiding  place,  and  impulsively  exclaimed  "all  is 
lost."  The  neighbor  became  suspicious,  opened  the  letter  which 
was  lying  on  the  table,  and  found  it  contained  information  re- 
garding the  plans  of  the  Continental  troops.  She  was  arrested, 
but  only  imprisoned  by  being  kept  closely  guarded  h/  friendly 
people  with  whom  she  resided.  The  British  interceded  for  her, 
and  finally  General  Putnam  aided  in  securing  permission  for  her 
to  join  her  father  on  Staten  Island.  Her  admirers  and  suitors 
were  many,  but  she  accepted  none,  until  persuaded  by  her  brother 
and  coerced  by  her  father  into  marrying  an  Irishman,  John  Cogh- 
lan,  with  whom  she  eventually  returned  to  his  country.  An  un- 
loving wife  is  seldom  a  loved  wife,  and  after  years  of  unhappiness 
with  a  cruel  husband  she  left  him.  She  sank  to  the  lowest  level  of 
degradation  through  destitution  and  despair,  and  died  at  an 
advanced  age  neglected  and  forgotten. 

The  British  during  the  war  took  advantage  of  the  weakness  of 
the  Indians  for  rum,  and  with  it  purchased  their  help,  or  gave  it  as 


162  AMELIA  DAY  CAMPBELL 

a  bounty  for  scalps.  The  worse  sufferers  were  of  course  the  un- 
protected women  and  children,  particularly  in  the  Mohawk 
Valley. 

In  the  Battle  of  Oriskany  great  numbers  of  Indians  lost  their 
lives,  and  in  revenge,  and  also  for  the  scalp  bounty,  they  mas- 
sacred the  settlers  of  Wyoming,  Cherry  Valley,  Geiman  Flatts, 
Cobleskill  and  Schoharie,  and  the  whole  valley  became  a  shambles. 

During  the  destiuction  of  the  Cherry  Valley  settlement,  Jane 
Campbell,  wife  of  Colonel  Samuel  Campbell,  and  hei  children 
were  carried  away  as  prisoners,  together  with  about  forty  others. 
All  were  released  a  few  days  later  except  Mrs.  Campbell  and  her 
children.  On  account  of  her  husband's  prominence  and  activity 
in  the  American  Army,  and  her  own  influence  as  well,  she  was 
sent  to  the  land  of  the  Senecas,  near  the  present  city  of  Geneva. 
Her  children,  one  an  infant  eighteen  months  old,  were  all  taken 
from  her  and  given  to  different  Indian  tribes.  She  lived  with  an 
Indian  fam.ily,  and  worked  for  many  other  Indians  for  a  year, 
when  she  was  exchanged  by  the  British,  sent  to  Fort  Niagara,  and 
kept  prisoner  there  for  another  year.  Here  her  children  were 
gradually  restored  to  her.  Finally,  after  two  years  of  captivity 
and  suffering  she  was  reunited  with  her  husband. 

Another  brave  woman  of  that  period  was  Nancy  Van  Alstyne 
of  Canajoharie,  daughter  of  old  Peter  Quackenbush  the  Indian 
trader,  whom  the  Indians  feared  and  respected,  believing  him  to 
be  "under  the  special  protection  of  the  Great  Spirit."  Mrs. 
Van  Alstyne,  learning  of  the  approach  of  the  Indians,  succeeded 
in  getting  her  fifteen  children  and  seven  neighboring  families  to  an 
island,  from  which  they  watched  the  destruction  of  their  homes. 
The  Van  Alstyne  house,  however,  was  left  untouched,  for  they 
agreed  to  "Let  the  old  Wolf  keep  his  den,"  and  Mrs.  Van  Alstyne 
sheltered  the  entire  seven  families  until  they  could  rebuild  their 
houses.  She  was  not  so  fortimate  when  a  few  months  later  the 
Indians  appeared  again  without  warning,  and  in  every  household 
left  killed  and  wounded,  carrying  others  away  captive.  The 
Van  Alstjme  house  was  again  left  standing,  but  its  contents  de- 
stroyed or  carried  away.  Mrs.  Van  Alstyne  fearlessly  followed 
them,  and  during  their  absence  hunting,  succeeded  in  reclaiming 
several  horses  belonging  to  her  husband,  much  clothing  and  many 
of  her  kitchen  utensils.     The  Indians  came  in  piirsuit  of  the  horses 


WOMEN  IN  THE  REVOLUTION  163 

and  threatened  to  kill  her  as  she  stood  with  her  back  to  the  stable 
door  and  dared  them  to  shoot.  Her  bravery  saved  her  and  they 
departed. 

There  is  a  settlement  called  Shell's  Bush  between  Herkimer 
and  Little  Falls  which  takes  its  name  from  John  Christian  Shell 
and  his  wife  Elizabeth  Petrie  Shell,  who  defended  their  fort-like 
house  against  an  Indian  and  Tory  attack.  Mrs.  Shell  loaded  the 
old  flint-lock  guns  for  her  husband  and  sons,  and  when  the  enemy 
thrust  their  gun  barrels  through  loopholes  in  the  building,  she 
smashed  them  with  an  axe.  The  enemy  was  repulsed,  but  her 
twin  boys  were  canied  away  captive. 

Even  though  you  all  know  the  history  of  the  beautiful,  nineteen 
year  old  Jane  McCrea,  yet  I  must  speak  of  it,  for  it  is  interwoven 
with  sympathy  and  romance,  and  her  grave  has  become  a  place  of 
historical  pilgrimage.  She  was  betrothed  to  a  British  soldier  who, 
in  order  to  secure  her  safety,  sent  a  band  of  Indians  to  escort  her 
to  the  British  camp.  But  they  met  another  Indian  tribe,  a  quarrel 
took  place,  one  of  the  chiefs  fired  and  killed  Miss  McCrea.  Her 
body,  disfigured  with  tomahawk  wounds,  was  left  behind,  but 
her  Indian  escort  carried  her  scalp  to  her  lover.  She  was  buried 
about  three  miles  from  Fort  Edward,  near  the  spot  where  she  was 
killed,  but  several  years  ago  Fort  Edward  people  had  the  remains 
removed  to  their  burying  ground. 

The  fate  of  Mary  Jamison  was  quite  different  but  likewise 
horrible.  When  about  twelve  years  old  her  parents  were  killed 
by  the  Indians  and  she  was  carried  away  and  given  to  two  Seneca 
squaws,  who  adopted  and  brought  her  up  as  a  sister.  She  was 
married  twice  to  Indians,  both  of  whom  treated  her  kindly.  At 
the  close  of  the  French  and  Indian  war  when  the  British  tried  to 
redeem  all  white  people  held  captive  by  the  Indians,  she  was 
offered  her  freedom,  but  refused  it.  At  the  close  of  the  Revolu- 
tion she  was  again  offered  freedom,  but  again  refused,  her  reason 
being  that  she  had  a  large  family  of  half-breed  children,  that  she 
felt  at  home  with  the  Indians,  and  would  be  despised  for  her 
ignorance  by  her  own  people.  She  died  near  Geneseo  where  she 
had  lived  many  years.  In  her  own  narrative  of  her  life  she  has 
explained  the  reason  for,  and  the  result  of,  the  Indian  participation 
with  the  British  in  the  Revolutionary  struggle,  from  the  Indians' 
point  of  view. 


164  AMELIA  DAY  CAMPBELL 

Only  a  few  years  ago  a  favorite  argiiment  against  women 
obtaining  the  franchise  was  that  they  could  not  perform  military 
duty.  Our  recent  world  war  has  shown  what  women  can  do  in 
times  of  war;  and  while  women  did  not  "shoulder  the  musket," 
as  they  sometimes  did  in  the  Revolution,  yet  as  nurses  they  in- 
vaded the  battlefields  and  brought  comfort  and  cheer  to  wounded 
and  dying  men.  They  worked  in  ammiunition  factories  to  provide 
the  means  for  carrying  on  warfare  to  its  successful  conclusion,  and 
in  every  branch  of  industry  released  men  for  service,  thus  in  a 
way  doing  a  real  military  service. 

In  the  Revolution  of  nearly  one  hundred  and  fifty  years  ago, 
however,  women  actually  did  fight  for  us.  We  have  the  records  of 
Molly  Pitcher,  Margaret  Corbin  and  Dorothy  Sampson  to  bear 
witness  to  that  fact,  and  while  they  were  not  New  York  women, 
yet  two  of  them  were  in  New  York  battles,  and  no  chronicle  of 
the  women  of  those  times  is  complete  without  mention  of  them. 

"Moll  o'  the  Pitcher,"  affectionately  so  called  by  the  soldiers 
because  of  the  broken  pitcher  in  which  she  carried  water  to  them 
on  the  battlefield,  but  whose  real  name  was  Mary  Hays,  had  for 
two  years  been  on  march,  in  camp  and  on  the  battlefield  with  her 
husband.  At  the  battle  of  Monmouth  he  was  wounded  while  in 
charge  of  a  gun.  She  begged  the  commanding  officer  to  let  her 
take  charge  of  it,  and  for  almost  an  entire  day  she  loaded  and 
fired  the  cannon.  The  battle  was  won  and  Molly  was  thanked 
personally  by  General  Washington  himself  for  her  service  and 
bravery.  Congress  voted  her  a  sergeant's  commission  and  half 
pay  for  life. 

Margaret  Corbin  was  a  direct  contrast  to  Molly,  being  small, 
sensitive  and  retiring,  whereas  Moll  was  big  and  strong  and 
helpful.  They  were  alike  however,  in  bravery  and  war  experi- 
ence, and  strangely  enough  Pennsylvania  was  the  home  state  of 
both.  At  the  Battle  of  Fort  Washington  Mrs.  Corbin's  husband 
was  killed.  She  begged  the  officer  to  let  her  fire  the  gun,  saying 
Jack  had  taught  her.  She  was  given,  permission,  and  was  severely 
wounded  while  at  her  self-imposed  heroic  task.  This  battle  was 
lost  and  the  Fort  taken,  but  the  enemy  admired  her  courage  and 
permitted  her  to  leave  the  Fort  as  a  non-combatant  and  not  as  a 
prisoner  of  war.  Congress  voted  that  "she  receive  during  her 
natural  life  or  continuance  of  disability,  one-half  pay  of  a  soldier  in 


WOMEN  IN  THE  REVOLUTION  165 

service."  Her  state  also  rewarded  her,  and  a  tablet  has  been 
placed  to  her  memory  on  the  site  of  the  battle  in  New  York  City. 
A  girl  who  actually  fought  as  a  soldier  was  Deborah  Sampson  of 
Massachusetts,  who  enlisted  for  three  years  under  the  name  -of 
Robert  Shtulliff.  She  was  with  Washington's  Army  at  West 
Point,  and  was  twice  wounded  at  the  battle  of  Tanytown.  She 
saw  active  service  for  a  year  before  it  was  known  that  she  was  a 
woman.  She  was  then  honorably  discharged  from  the  army  and 
received  a  pension. 

Unfortunately  disease  always  follows  an  army,  and  an  epidemic 
of  smallpox  broke  out  in  several  camps.  Two  women  became  as 
great  heroines  in  fighting  it  as  though  facing  the  fire  of  battle,  for 
they  took  these  contagious  cases  to  their  homes  and  nursed  them. 
Catherine  Greene,  wife  of  General  Nathanael  Greene  of  Rhode  Island 
was  one,  and  Molly  Stark  (really  Elizabeth),  of  New  Hampshire 
the  other.  When  smallpox  broke  out  in  General  Stark's  camp 
at  Fort  Ticonderoga,  Mrs.  Stark  ntirsed  the  sick  back  to  health 
in  her  home,  among  them  her  own  children,  and  she  herself  was 
disfigured  for  life  from  its  ravages. 

A  woman  who  undoubtedly  saved  a  complete  division  of  troops 
was  Mary  Lindley  Murray,  whose  heart  was  secretly  with  the 
Revolutionary  cause,  though  her  husband  Robert  Murray  was  an 
avowed  royalist.  General  Putnam  in  order  to  join  the  main 
army  was  hastening  his  retreat  from  New  York  along  the  river 
road.  Gen.  Tryon  with  his  British  and  Hessian  forces  twice  as 
large  as  Putnam's,  would  have  met  him  before  he  reached  a  fork 
in  the  road,  but  they  halted  in  front  of  "The  Grange"  on  Mtirray 
Hill,  and  Mrs.  Murray  went  out  and  invited  General  Tryon  and 
his  officers  to  breakfast,  and  entertained  them  with  her  brilliant 
conversation  for  a  couple  of  hours — and  Putnam,  who  needed 
only  a  half  hour's  start,  reached  the  main  army  and  reinforce- 
ments. 

Janet  Livingston  Montgomery,  daughter  of  Robert  Livingston, 
who  was  for  many  years  Judge  of  the  Supreme  Court  and  owner 
of  much  property  along  the  Hudson,  is  remembered  in  history  as 
the  widow  of  the  patriot  Richard  Montgomery  who  rose  to  the 
rank  of  General  and  was  killed  at  the  siege  of  Quebec.  After 
his  death  she  went  to  Dublin  to  visit  his  family,  from  which 
place  she  wrote  to  a  friend  at  home — "I  hope  when  I  return  to 


166  AMELIA  DAY  CAMPBELL 

find  my  dear  country,  for  which  I  have  bled,  the  envy  of  her 
enemies  and  the  glory  of  her  patriots."  She  never  ceased  to 
mourn  her  husband's  death,  though  she  survived  him  52  years. 

Many  women  unhesitatingly  accepted  the  risk  of  the  martyr- 
dom which  would  have  been  theirs  if  the  war  had  been  lost,  for  all 
the  wives  of  the  brave  signers  of  the  Declaration  of  Independence 
thought  no  more  of  self  than  did  their  husbands.  Both  were 
willing  to  share  the  persecution  and  imprisonment  by  the  British 
then  in  power,  and  knew  full  well  that  their  imprisonment  would 
follow  if  the  enemy  won.     Some  of  these  women  were  martyrs. 

Elizabeth  Annsley  Lewis,  wife  of  the  signer  Francis  Lewis,  was 
seized  after  the  Battle  of  Long  Island  (which  was  the  first  battle 
after  the  signing)  and  thrown  into  prison  in  New  York,  where  she 
was  detained  three  months.  Her  health  was  so  broken  when  re- 
leased, that  she  died  soon  after. 

Hannah  Jones  Floyd,  wife  of  Wilham  Floyd,  a  signer,  was 
obliged  to  escape  to  Connecticut  from  her  Long  Island  home  with 
her  children,  and  remained  there  seven  years.  Their  property 
was  so  destroyed  by  the  British  when  they  took  Long  Island  that 
the  family  never  returned  there,  and  Mrs.  Floyd  died  in  her  exile 
home. 

Mary  Walton  Morris,  wife  of  Lewis  Morris,  signer,  escaped 
with  her  family  after  her  property  near  New  York  was  destroyed 
during  this  same  period. 

Mrs.  Christina  Ten  Broeck  Livingston,  wife  of  Philip  Livingston, 
signer,  lived  on  Brooklyn  Heights,  and  Washington's  successful 
retreat  fiom  Long  Island  was  planned  at  a  conference  in  her 
home. 

Mary  Gates,  the  wife  of  General  Horatio  Gates,  was  English 
by  birth,  but  a  New  Yorker  by  adoption,  and  lived  on  their  estate 
near  New  York  during  the  war.  Here  she  nursed  many  sick  and 
wounded,  among  them  the  Polish  patriot  Kosciusko,  who  was  re- 
stored to  health  after  her  six  months'  care  of  him. 

Several  New  York  women  have  been  memorialized  as  patron 
saints  by  the  Daughters  of  the  American  Revolution.  Lucy 
Dougherty  Tucker,  who  providentially  escaped  death  at  the 
hands  of  the  Indians  during  their  uprising  in  the  Mohawk  Valley, 
was  a  pioneer  in  clearing  the  forest  and  establishing  her  home  in 
the  wilderness.     Although  the  mother  of  eighteen  children,  she 


WOMEN  IN  THE  REVOLUTION  167 

foiind  time  to  nurse  her  sick  neighbors,  and  her  ministrations 
many  times  made  a  doctor's  visits  unnecessary,  for  a  doctor  was 
hard  to  get  in  the  primitive  settlement,  and  equally  hard  to  pay. 
Her  granddaughter,  who  lived  in  Utica,  became  a  New  York 
State  Regent. 

Charity  Mersereau,  wife  of  Colonel  Jacob  Mersereau,  both  of 
whom  were  patriotic  residents  of  Staten  Island,  even  though  the 
Island  had  the  reputation  of  being  "a  nest  of  Tories,"  has  been 
made  a  patron  saint  of  the  Charity  Mersereau  Chapter,  the 
charter  members  of  which  are  all  Mersereau  descendants. 

Margaret  Todd  Whetton  was  the  wife  of  a  New  York  merchant, 
who,  on  accoimt  of  ill  health,  was  a  non-combatant,  but  secretly 
an  American  sympathizer.  Their  home  at  New  Rochelle  was 
right  in  the  path  of  the  army,  and  was  frequently  visited  by  the 
American,  British  and  Hessian  officers.  After  her  husband's 
death  Mrs.  Whetton  and  her  children  returned  to  New  York, 
but  in  very  straitened  circumstances,  for  she  had  converted  her 
property  into  continental  currency  which  depreciated  very  much. 
Against  all  advice  Mrs.  Whetton  would  not  exchange  it,  saying 
"I  will  never  undervalue  the  ciurency  established  by  Congress." 
She  daily  took  food  to  American  prisoners  in  camp  and  on  the 
prison  ships.  She  had  the  honor  of  being  the  first  one  told  of  the 
news  of  peace,  and  by  General  Washington  himself,  when  he  asked 
to  take  breakfast  with  her  that  morning,  and  thanked  her  for  all 
she  had  done  for  the  army.  A  Washington,  D.C.,  Chapter  is 
named  foi  Mrs.  Whetton. 

There  was  no  class  distinction  in  patriotism.  It  sprang  up, 
flourished  and  reached  inspiring,  heroic  and  sacrificial  heights  in 
every  locality  and  in  all  walks  of  life.  Every  state  had  her  heroine 
of  the  home  and  the  battlefield,  and  one  could  go  on  and  on,  re- 
counting their  deeds.  These  I  have  mentioned  are  but  a  few  of 
the  noble  women  of  that  emancipation  period,  to  whom  a  British 
officer  correctly  referred  when  he  told  Comwallis:  "We  may 
destroy  all  the  men  in  America  and  we  shall  still  have  all  we  can 
do  to  defeat  the  women."  It  has  been  truly  said  that  "Always 
in  history  woman  has  been  at  her  best  when  felt  to  be  most  neces- 
sary." 

These  Revolutionary  women  were  descendants  of  those  loyal 
mothers  from  European  countries  who  in  the  beginning  of  our 


168  AMELIA  DAY  CAMPBELL 

history  followed  their  husbands,  fathers  and  sweethearts  across 
the  perilous  ocean.  They  uncomplainingly  bore  the  privations  of 
pioneering  and  braved  its  dangers — not  for  wealth  or  position  or 
honor,  but  for  love  of  their  men — that  they  might  establish  their 
homes  with  their  loved  ones  in  a  new  land  and  there  rear  their 
families.  Those  staunch  women,  without  whom  the  men  would 
indeed  have  been  helpless,  were  pioneers  in  founding  our  country, 
and  the  women  of  the  Revolution  were  pioneers  in  preserving  that 
land  and  those  homes,  that  they  and  their  posterity  might  richly 
enjoy  the  blessings  of  Liberty  Triumphant. 

Amelia  Day  Campbell 


Authorities 

The  Goede   Vrouw  of  Mana-ha-ta.     By  Mrs.  John  Van  Rensselaer  King. 
Women  of  the  Revolution.     By  Elizabeth  F.  Ellet. 

Pioneer  Women  of  America.     By  Harry  Clinton  Green  and  Mary  Wolcott 
Green. 


ANXIOUS  MOMENTS  IN  FRONTIER  HISTORY^ 

OUR   CANADIAN-AMERICAN   RELATIONS 

I  have  gladly  accepted  the  invitation  of  the  New  York  State 
Historical  Society  to  take  part  in  its  proceedings.  Any  Canadian 
in  a  public  position  to-day,  who  should  refuse  an  invitation  to 
say  something  regarding  the  co-operative  spirit  between  Canada 
and  the  United  States,  as  promoted  by  historical  study,  would  fail 
in  a  duty.  The  story  of  the  relationship  for  a  century  past  be- 
tween the  United  States  and  Canada  is  one  of  which  both  countries 
may  well  be  proud.  These  three  thousand  miles  of  frontier,  un- 
guarded by  soldier  or  war  vessel,  are  themselves  the  best  of  all 
witnesses  to  the  determination  on  each  side  that  international  com- 
plications shall  be  avoided.  The  association  between  Canada  and 
the  United  States  has,  however,  been  even  more  intimate  since  the 
outbreak  of  the  Great  War  than  it  was  before.  Canada  now  stands 
more  or  less  in  the  position  of  being  the  interpreter  of  the  Old 
World  to  the  New.  It  would  be  foolish  to  deny  that  the  possibili- 
ties of  trouble  between  Great  Britain  and  the  United  States  are 
always  present.  We  know  that  these  two  great  Powers  hold  the 
peace  of  the  world  in  their  hands.  But,  for  international  purposes 
it  is  no  advantage  that  we  talk  the  same  language.  We  under- 
stand too  quickly  each  what  the  other  is  saying.  When  there  is 
such  swiftness  of  apprehension  the  interpreter,  who  may  likewise 
be  the  diplomat,  has  no  time  in  which  to  work.  There  are  jour- 
nalists on  either  side  who  are  only  too  anxious  to  fish  in  troubled 
waters.  Not  for  many  days  has  anything  more  significant  with 
regard  to  the  difference  between  the  two  peoples  been  written 
than  the  letters  of  the  late  Mr.  Page  to  President  Wilson. 
Mr.  Page  may  be  ranked  high  in  that  great  succession  which  has 
occupied  the  American  Embassy  in  London.  He  was  "one  hun- 
dred per  cent  American,"  but  he  understood  the  Englishman,  and 
he  knew  the  situation  well  enough  to  appreciate  elements  in  it 
which,  without  sympathy,  might  only  have  been  the  objects  of 
criticism. 


^An  address  delivered  at  the  Lake  George  meeting  of  the  New  York  State 
Historical  Association,  October,  3,  1921. 


169 


170  R.  BRUCE  TAYLOR 

In  Canada  we  stand,  so  to  speak,  midway  between  the  United 
States  and  Great  Britain.  We  are  passionately  loyal  to  our  flag, 
but  that  does  not  mean  that  we  refrain  occasionally  from  having 
our  laugh  at  the  standard-bearer.  And  on  the  other  hand,  while 
our  business  and  our  educational  interests  may  be  increasingly 
influenced  by  your  republican  influence,  we  claim  the  right  of 
being  dispassionate  critics  of  your  institutions,  a  position  which 
is  not  unfitting  to  those  upon  whom  there  blow  the  chilling  winds 
from  Hudson  Bay.  To  us  in  Canada  the  Englishman  is  often  al- 
most as  great  a  problem  as  he  is  to  you.  We  wonder  at  his  self- 
possession  and  we  are  sometimes  estranged  by  the  relationship 
which  he  takes  for  granted  must  exist  between  the  Canadian  citizen 
and  the  manners  and  customs  of  the  Red  Indian.  But  we  knew 
him  in  war  to  be  a  very  gallant  gentleman,  "buxom,  blythe,  and 
debonair."  We  loved  his  quietness  and  lack  of  self-assertiveness. 
As  Canadians,  we  were  embarrassed  by  the  amount  of  attention 
that  our  military  affairs  received,  while  we  thought  of  English 
cotmty  battalions,  which  never  found  their  name  in  a  newspaper 
report.  At  the  same  time,  we,  as  your  neighbors,  are  able  to 
appreciate  you  in  a  way  that  can  hardly  be  expected  of  an  older 
civilization.  Our  manufacturing  enterprises  are  in  method  closely 
related  to  your  own.  On  a  great  continent,  such  as  this,  education 
must  always  be  more  or  less  of  a  unity.  We  are  striving  as  you 
are  to  form  a  native  art,  a  thing  that  shall  not  be  merely  French 
and  derivative.  We  hope  eventually  to  develop  a  native  music. 
You  are  no  more  foreigners  to  us  than  we  are  to  the  citizens  of 
Great  Britain.  For  these  reasons  then  a  Canadian  may  be  allowed 
to  speak  to  the  New  York  vState  Historical  Association  of  relation- 
ships existing  between  the  Dominion  and  the  Republic  with  a  di- 
rectness that  you  might  be  prepared  to  resent  in  one  but  lately 
come  across  the  seas. 

To-day,  therefore,  I  should  like  to  address  myself  to  certain  as- 
pects of  the  frontier  problem.  The  commonplace  that  a  frontier 
always  is  a  potential  danger  is  illustrated  afresh  by  the  different 
attitudes  taken  up  by  France  and  Great  Britain  in  relation  to  Ger- 
many. You  can  see,  in  British  diplomacy,  willingness  to  allow  Ger- 
many again  to  get  upon  her  feet.  Great  Britain  is  convinced  that  the 
world  can  never  again  recover  itself  so  long  as  the  Central 
Powers  of  Europe  are  bound  in  insolvency.     But  France,  with  her 


ANXIOUS  MOMENTS  IN  FRONTIER  HISTORY     171 

long  frontier  bordering  upon  Germany,  has  a  different  accent  in  her 
speech.  She  has  the  memory  of  1870.  She  has  the  ruined  North- 
East.  She  has  her  stationary  population  over  against  the  prolific 
Teuton.  Above  all  things  she  has  the  fear  that  the  next  generation 
may  suffer  another  leap  on  the  part  of  the  Germanic  peoples.  The 
strip  of  water  that  we  call  the  English  Channel  makes  all  the  differ- 
ence to  the  national  attitude.  Mark  Pattison's  cynical  view  is 
that  a  man's  worse  vexations  come  from  his  own  relations,  but 
even  relations  are  tolerable  if  they  live  far  enough  away.  And  so 
it  is  with  countries,  however  deep  be  the  essential  goodwill  that  they 
bear  one  to  another.  Near  neighborhood  is  the  parent  of  strife. 
The  most  creditable  thing  in  the  relationship  of  the  United  States 
and  Canada  has  been  the  century  of  unbroken  peace,  but  the  les- 
sons to  be  drawn  from  that  long  period  may  be  useful  when  we 
think  of  the  prospects  of  to-morrow. 

In  the  final  delimitation  of  boundaries  one  great  source  of  trouble 
has  been  removed,  but  that  delimitation  has  not  been  reached 
without  the  gravest  anxiety  on  both  sides.  In  the  debates  regard- 
ing the  Maine  boundary  and  the  Territory  of  Oregon  the  result  was 
distinctly  to  the  benefit  of  the  United  States.  I  do  not  say  that  in 
these  discussions  we  were  out-generaled.  I  do  say,  however,  that 
the  Old  Country  view  of  its  colonies  eighty  years  ago  was  not  one 
likely  to  put  Canada  in  a  favorable  position  when  a  bargain  had  to 
be  made.  In  the  thirties  and  the  forties  of  last  century  it  had  come 
to  be  accepted  almost  as  an  axiom  that  the  Canadas  would  even- 
tually be  absorbed  in  the  United  States.  What  had  happened  in 
1776  was  likely  again  to  happen  some  decades  later,  only  it  was 
felt  that  the  change  would  come  about  without  any  armed  struggle. 
Canada,  too,  in  these  boundary  discussions,  suffered  from  igno- 
rance, without  boundary,  on  the  part  of  English  administrators  of 
colonial  afiairs.  Even  now  the  Ashburton  Treaty  is  a  sore  subject 
in  Canada.  And  yet  Canadians  ought  to  remind  themselves  that 
in  1835  Palmerston  was  offered  and  refused  a  settlement  by  Pres- 
ident Jackson,  a  settlement  infinitely  more  favorable  than  that  which 
was  arrived  at  only  a  few  years  later  during  the  Ashburton  Treaty. 
The  issue,  as  an  historical  issue,  is  now  dead  and  buried.  The 
question  that  will  keep  that  dispute  alive  with  those  who  are  inter- 
ested in  the  philosophy  and  ethics  of  history  is  as  to  whether  Daniel 
Webster  should  have  acted  as  an  advocate  or  as  an  arbiter.     He 


172  R.  BRUCE  TAYLOR 

was  at  all  events  much  too  powerful  a  personality  for  the  genial 
statesman  who  was  appointed  by  the  British  Government. 

In  the  Oregon  dispute,  too,  there  was  no  realization  on  the  part 
of  Old  Country  statesmen  of  the  vastness  of  the  issues  involved. 
The  story  may  be  apocryphal,  but  if  not  true  it  might  very  well  be 
true,  that  the  settlement  which  was  reached  was  made  all  the 
easier  for  the  Government  of  Lord  Aberdeen  by  the  knowledge  that 
the  salmon  of  the  Coltunbia  River  would  not  rise  to  the  fly.  These 
are,  however,  matters  now  of  ancient  history,  which  we  might  as 
well  lose  our  temper  over,  as  over  the  fact  of  the  Battle  of  Bunker's 
Hill.  Whatever  difficulties  may  emerge  in  the  future,  they  are  not 
difficulties  which  will  relate  to  boundaries.  Much  more  likely  are 
they  to  be  difficulties  relatively  slight  in  themselves,  but  accent- 
uated by  the  actions  and  utterances  of  irresponsible  groups,  bent 
on  making  trouble.  We  all  know  how  the  Irish  situation  has  cre- 
ated difficulty  during  the  last  few  years.  Whatever  your  sympa- 
thies may  be  in  that  issue,  you  will  admit  that  loyal  subjects  of  the 
British  Empire  have  oftentimes  been  placed  in  difficulty.  An  in- 
cident in  a  Boston  theatre  during  the  summer  of  1920  is  typical  of 
such.  During  the  intermission,  an  officer  of  your  army,  a  very 
gallant  and  soldierly  figure  in  full  uniform  came  on  the  stage  and 
made  an  impassioned  appeal  for  the  Irish  Republic.  After  his 
speech,  girls,  dressed  in  green,  went  through  the  audience,  which 
obviously  was  in  sympathy  with  the  Irish  cause,  and  gathered  large 
quantities  of  money.  Had  a  similar  demonstration  been  made  in 
a  London  theatre  on  behalf  of  the  legal  rights  and  liberties  of  the 
negroes  of  Georgia  it  would  possibly  have  given  rise  to  a  diplomatic 
incident.  And  yet  in  the  early  sixties,  when  you  had  your  backs 
to  the  wall,  equally  irritating  demonstrations  were  made  on  behalf 
of  the  Secessionists.  The  fact  that  we  have  come  through  times 
of  trouble  without  natural  feelings  of  anger  finding  such  an  expres- 
sion that  might  have  led  to  the  tragedy  of  war  is  the  best  of  all 
guarantees  of  future  peace. 

Let  me  dwell  for  a  minute  upon  a  crucial  incident  that  took 
place  more  than  eighty  years  ago  at  a  time  when  the  possibilities  of 
trouble  were  far  more  acute  than  now,  to  show  the  temper  in  which 
disputes  can  be  dealt  with,  and  the  attitude  which  makes  men  on 
either  side  realize  that  they  are  the  citizens  of  no  mean  people. 


ANXIOUS  MOMENTS  IN  FRONTIER  HISTORY    173 

The  story  of  the  struggle  of  Upper  and  Lower  Canada  for  Re- 
sponsible Government  is  full  of  interest  and  it  produced  one  doc- 
ument of  first  rate  historical  value — the  Report  of  Lord  Durham. 
The  relationship  of  the  British  Government  to  its  various  domin- 
ions and  dependencies  is  to-day  strong  only  as  it  is  undefined.  Our 
loyalty  increases  in  proportion  as  we  are  left  alone.  We  rule  our- 
selves: we  will  not  be  ruled  from  Westminster.  But  up  till  1840 
a  very  different  view  held  the  field.  The  position  then  accepted  in 
England  was  that  the  Crown  ruled  in  Canada  through  the  Crown's 
representative,  and  that  policy  was  shaped  in  London.  In  effect 
this  came  to  mean  in  Upper  Canada  that  all  power  got  into  the 
hands  of  a  closely  related  group  of  definitely  conservative  tendency. 
All  patronage  was  held  by  this  group  and  the  popular  Assemblies 
were  not  able  to  dissociate  the  Family  Compact  from  the  represent- 
ative of  the  Crown.  The  Old  Country  was  afraid  of  giving  the 
colonies  self-government.  It  thought  that  to  grant  any  such 
liberty  would  mean  the  immediate  severance  of  Canada  from  the 
Empire.  The  theory,  however,  of  the  paternal  Crown  relation- 
ship could  not  hold  in  the  conditions  that  were  arising  in  Canada. 
Eventually,  of  course,  complete  self-government  was  given  to  the 
Dominion,  but  before  this  liberty,  which  has  been  chiefest 
parent  of  loyalty,  was  reached,  the  country  was  in  a  condition  of 
actual  revolution.  Among  the  French,  Papineau  led  a  rebellion 
which  was  crushed  with  ease,  but  in  Upper  Canada  William  Lyon 
Mackenzie  brought  about  a  situation  that  all  but  threw  Great 
Britain  and  the  Republic  into  war. 

The  cry  that  liberty  is  in  danger  is,  of  coiu-se,  one  that  appeals 
to  every  generous  spirit,  and  in  Canada  as  in  the  northern  parts  of 
the  United  States  there  was  a  great  deal  of  sympathy  with  the 
liberal  views  of  Mackenzie.  There  is,  however,  a  great  gulf  be- 
tween the  holding  of  liberal  sentiments  and  the  willingness  to  rush 
into  revolution.  Mackenzie,  a  hot-headed  Scotchman,  assembled 
in  December,  1837,  on  Navy  Island,  just  above  the  Falls  of  Niagara 
a  nondescript  group  of  Canadians  and  Americans,  bound  together 
as  much  by  lawlessness  of  temperament  as  by  any  special  political 
view.  Navy  Island  was  in  Canadian  territory,  but  Grand  Island, 
lying  just  above  it  belonged  to  the  United  States,  and  the  neighbor- 
hood of  both  places  to  so  large  a  city  as  Buffalo  assured  that  many 
discontented  spirits  would  find  their  way  to  the  scene  of  trouble. 


174  R.  BRUCE  TAYLOR 

There  is  no  question  but  that  the  sympathy  with  Mackenzie  was 
widespread.     Even  if  the  thing  had  been  possible  there  was  no 
consuming  desire  on  the  part  of  the  authorities  of  New  York  State 
to  enforce  neutrahty.     A  gun,  for  instance,  was  allowed  to  get  out 
of  the  charge  of  the  State  Artillery  on  the  ground  that  it  was  being 
taken  to  Navy  Island  to  shoot  wild  ducks!     It  was,  however,  the 
actions  of  those  in  charge  of  the  Steamer  "Caroline"  which  pre- 
cipitated trouble.     This  little  steamer  in  the  middle  of  December 
was  held  in  the  ice  at  Buffalo,  but  she  was  cut  out  of  her  winter 
quarters  and  taken  down  the  river  to  Fort  Schlosser  opposite 
Navy  Island.     The  owner,  William  Wells  of  Buffalo,  was  indem- 
nified against  loss  by  the  bonds  of  a  nvimber  of  his  fellow  citizens, 
and  the  ship  was  given  a  clearance  from  the  port  of  Buffalo  by  the 
collector  of  the  port.     Meanwhile  the  forces  that  had  been  assem- 
bled on  Navy  Island  began  to  bombard  the  mainland  with  little 
other  damage  than  the  killing  of  a  horse  on  which  a  Canadian  sol- 
dier was  riding.     It  was,  however,  noticed  that  on  the  afternoon 
of  the  28th  of  December,  in  broad  daylight,  the  "Caroline"  was 
running  between  Schlosser  and  Navy  Island  carrying  men  and 
stores.     Colonel  Allan  MacNab  determined  that  he  would  stop 
the  career  of  this  piratical  little  vessel.     Instructions  were  given  to 
Captain  Drew  to  take  and  destroy  the  "Caroline",  'Wherever  he 
should  find  her,'  five  words  which  as  has  been  said  "nearly  fired 
the  Continent  as  well  as  the  Caroline."     On  the  night  of  the  29th 
of  December  accordingly  five  boats,  each  manned  by  nine  men, 
set  out  to  deal  with  the  "Caroline. ' '     On  rounding  the  southern  end 
of  Navy  Island  they  found  that  the  vessel  was  moored  to  the  wharf 
at  Fort  Schlosser.     The  boats  were  unseen  until  they  were  almost 
alongside  of  the  "Caroline,"  which  was  practically  unguarded  and 
was  giving  shelter  for  the  night  to  some  twenty-three  men  of  the 
nondescript  forces  being  gathered  under  Mackenzie    and    Van 
Rensselaer.     The  attack  on  the  "Caroline"  lasted  only  a  few  min- 
utes.    The  ship  was  towed  out  from  the  wharf,  set  on  fire,  and 
allowed  to  drift  with  the  current.     Mackenzie  declares  that  she 
went  over  the  Falls,  but  as  a  matter  of  fact  the  steamer  sank  on  the 
American  side  where  the  remains  of  her  engines  were  for  many 
years  afterwards  visible.     One  man,   Amos  Durfee,  was  found 
lying  dead  upon  the  wharf  with  his  brains  blown  out.     It  was 
asserted  that  several  of  the  men  who  had  been  asleep  on  board  the 


ANXIOUS  MOMENTS  IN  FRONTIER  HISTORY     175 

steamer  were  drowned  in  the  scuffle,  but  this  point  was  never  prov- 
ed, and  it  would  have  been  in  any  case  an  extremely  difficult  thing 
to  trace  the  identity  of  men  recruited  for  such  lawless  purposes. 

In  Canada  the  news  of  the  destruction  of  the  "Caroline"  was 
hailed  with  rapture.  Colonel  MacNab  received  a  knighthood; 
Captain  Drew,  who  had  led  the  cutting-out  party  was  given  a 
sword  of  honor,  and  it  was  only  when  heads  had  time  to  cool  that 
it  was  seen  how  serious  a  situation  had  been  created.  Unquestion- 
ably there  had  been  on  the  part  of  individual  citizens  of  the  United 
States  breaches  of  neutrality.  Van  Rensselaer,  who  was  Mac- 
kenzie's military  adviser,  was  himself  a  citizen  of  the  United  States. 
But  it  is  one  thing  when  individuals  engage  in  lawless  acts  and 
quite  another  when  a  State  makes  a  descent  upon  the  shores 
of  a  friendly  power.  One  has  to  make  allowances  in  considering 
the  action  of  the  Canadians  for  the  intense  irritation  caused  by 
seeing  this  little  steamer  in  broad  day-light  run  back  and  forward 
with  supplies  for  the  rebels.  The  situation,  however,  was  one 
which  should  have  been  dealt  with,  not  in  this  headstrong  way, 
but  by  the  regular  channels  of  political  action.  Mackenzie's 
movement  had  up  to  this  time  met  with  no  real  sympathy  among 
responsible  Americans  but  the  violation  of  neutrality  created  a  com- 
plete change  of  view. 

The  "Caroline"  incident,  however,  had  a  sequel  which  created 
another  critical  situation.  Three  years  after  the  Navy  Island 
incident,  Alexander  McLeod,  a  deputy  sheriff  of  the  Niagara  dis- 
trict, was  arrested  at  Lewiston  and  charged  with  murder  and  arson, 
the  murder  being  alleged  to  be  the  death  of  Amos  Durfee.  McLeod 
who  had  been  in  Buffalo  on  the  24th  of  December,  1837,  had  heard 
there,  as  a  matter  of  common  talk,  of  the  purposes  to  which  the 
"Caroline"  was  to  be  devoted.  Returning  to  the  Canadian  side 
he  reconnoitred  the  river  on  the  28th  of  December  with  Captain 
Drew,  and  saw  the  "Caroline"  engaged  in  her  nefarious  work.  He 
was  a  man  of  boastful  temper  and  there  was  some  evidence  which 
went  to  show  that  he  had  declared  himself  to  be  one  of  the  at- 
tacking party  on  the  29th  of  December.  It  is  perfectly  certain 
that  he  was  not  one  of  the  members  of  the  cutting-out  expedition. 

The  forty-five  men  who  did  that  deed  were  all  of  them  known 
from  the  hour  of  the  attack.     The  case,  however,  speedily  assumed 


176  R.  BRUCE  TAYLOR 

a  grave  international  character.  The  grand  jury  of  Niagara  Coun- 
ty found  a  true  bill  against  the  prisoner  who  was  committed  to 
stand  his  trial  and  confined  in  Lockport  jail. 

When  the  British  minister  in  Washington,  Mr.  H.  S.  Fox, 
heard  the  details  of  the  story,  he  demanded  the  immediate  release 
of  the  prisoner  on  the  ground  that,  as  the  destruction  of  the  "Car- 
oline" was  the  public  act  of  certain  known  individuals  in  the  Brit- 
ish forces,  it  could  not  be  alleged  as  a  ground  of  indictment  against 
an  individual,  even  if  he  were  concerned  in  it.  It  is  precisely  the 
argument  which  was  raised  by  the  defense  of  the  German  prisoners 
recently  tried  in  Leipzig  for  actions  contrary  to  the  laws  of  war. 
The  Federal  Government  refused  the  claim  of  Mr.  Fox  on  the 
ground  that  each  State  of  the  Union  had  control  of  its  own  ju- 
dicial affairs,  and  that,  therefore,  the  offense  committed  within  the 
State  of  New  York  must  be  answered  for  before  the  Courts  of  the 
State.  In  March,  1841,  Mr.  Fox  again  renewed  his  demand  upon 
Washington  in  these  terms,  "I  am  instructed  to  demand  formally 
and  in  the  name  of  the  British  Government  the  immediate  release 
of  Alexander  McLeod  for  the  reason  that  the  transgression  was  one 
of  a  public  character,  planned  and  executed  by  persons  duly  author- 
ized by  the  Colonial  Government  to  take  such  measures  as  might  be 
necessary  for  protecting  the  property  and  lives  of  her  Majesty's 
subjects,  and  being,  therefore,  an  act  of  public  duty,  they  cannot 
be  held  responsible  to  the  laws  and  tribunal  of  any  foreign  coun- 
try." It  is  not  necessary  here  to  go  further  into  the  details  of  the 
case.  A  writ  of  Habeas  Corpus  was  applied  for  and  discharged. 
McLeod  was  brought  to  trial  and  acquitted  after  he  had  been  in 
prison  for  nearly  a  year. 

Obviously  there  was  here  a  situation  which  bristled  with  all 
kinds  of  international  danger.  In  the  case  of  the  destruction  of 
the  "Caroline,"  a  deed  was  done  under  great  provocation  by  con- 
stituted authority  in  defiance  of  international  law.  In  the  case  of 
Alexander  McLeod,  a  position  was  taken  up  by  the  State  of  New 
York  which  might  have  put  the  Federal  Government  at  any  time 
into  a  position  of  the  utmost  difficulty.  The  Federal  authority 
could  not  interfere  with  the  judicial  powers  of  the  State  of  New 
York :  the  British  Government  could  not  make  any  representations 
to  the  State  of  New  York  but  could  only  approach  the  Federal 
authority.     What  is  pertinent  to  this  discussion  to-day  is  to  note 


ANXIOUS  MOMENTS  IN  FRONTIER  HISTORY     177 

the  way  in  which  this  critical  situation  was  met.  The  British 
Parliament  in  1842  expressed  through  Sir  Robert  Peel  its  regret 
that  some  explanation  and  apology  had  not  been  previously  made 

(for  the  "Caroline"  incident) it  was  the  opinion  of  candid 

and  honourable  men  that  the  British  officers  who  executed  this 
action,  and  their  government  who  approved,  had  intended  no  in- 
sult or  disrespect  to  the  sovereign  authority  of  the  United  States. 
The  United  States,  on  its  side,  dealt  with  the  plea  advanced  re- 
garding McLeod  that,  if  he  had  acted  as  had  been  alleged,  he  had 
done  so,  not  as  an  individual,  but  as  one  of  an  organized  force  oper- 
ating with  official  sanction.  To  meet  a  case  such  as  his,  an  Act 
was  passed  by  the  United  States  directing  that  in  the  case  of  sub- 
jects of  foreign  powers  taken  into  custody  for  acts  done  under  the 
authority  of  their  own  government  "the  validity  or  effect  whereof 
depends  upon  the  law  of  nations,"  there  should  be  a  discharge. 
Time  had  been  able  to  operate  and  feeling  had  been  allowed  to 
subside.  One  cannot  help  wondering,  however,  what  the  result 
would  have  been  if  McLeod  had  been  declared  guilty  of  murder 
and  had  been  hanged  as  a  malefactor.  The  issue,  however,  was 
worthily  met,  and  the  source  of  danger  to  the  peace  of  nations  was, 
let  it  be  hoped,  forever  removed. 

It  does  not  require  much  imagination  to  see  that  in  the  enforce- 
ment of  prohibition  legislation  there  are  potentialities  of  trouble. 
A  three  mile  limit  beyond  which  State  control  does  not  run  is  but 
a  small  obstacle  to  a  swift  motor  boat,  and  a  situation,  under 
which  vessels  from  the  West  Indies  laden  with  liquor  are  hanging 
about  off  the  three  mile  boundary  ready  to  transfer  their  cargoes 
to  boats  manned  by  smugglers,  suggests  that  there  is  some  need  of 
international  agreement  if  issues  are  not  to  arise  which  might  very 
soon  raise  serious  trouble.  Liquor  is  a  legitimate  cargo  for  a  West 
India  schooner,  nor  is  it  the  business  of  Great  Britain  to  enforce 
the  prohibition  measures  of  the  United  States.  Can  the  destination 
of  that  liquor  be  controlled  by  the  government  of  the  country 
which  ships  it  ? 

This,  however,  is  a  minor  matter  compared  with  the  great  issue 
which  faces  the  two  countries  alike  through  the  development  of 
Japan.  When  the  then  Premier  of  Canada,  Mr.  Meighen,  went 
to  the  Dominion  Conference  in  London  last  summer  it  was  believed 
that  he  intended  to  represent  to  the  British  government  in  the 


178  R.  BRUCE  TAYLOR 

strongest  manner  the  Canadian  belief  that  the  renewal  of  the 
Anglo- Japanese  agreement  would  be  altogether  unpleasing  to  the 
people  of  the  Dominion.  In  this  Canadians  were  at  one  with  the 
United  States  in  feeling  that  such  a  treaty  would  be  one  more 
barrier  to  any  general  policy  of  disarmament.  If  the  United 
States  with  its  population  of  110,000,000  looked  with  anxiety 
upon  the  unrestricted  admission  of  Orientals,  Canada  with  its 
vast  area  containing  only  9,000,000  people  had  a  far  greater 
apprehension.  It  was  evident  that  the  United  States  regarded 
the  Pacific  Question  as  the  most  urgent  of  its  international  prob- 
lems. For  the  British  Government  to  renew  the  Anglo- Japanese 
Alliance  would  not  only  create  feeling  in  the  States  by 
appearing  to  throw  British  influence  into  the  Japanese  side  of  that 
issue,  but  it  would  certainly  create  powerful  opposition  in  Canada 
which  was  determined  that  it  would  not  add  to  its  difficulties  as  a 
young  country  by  the  creation  of  a  new  colour  problem. 

This  generation  is  not  likely  to  know  what  happened  at  the 
Imperial  Conference,  but,  after  Mr.  Meighen's  arrival  on  the 
scene,  the  Lord  Chancellor  discovered  that  the  Anglo-Japanese 
treaty  had  still  another  year  to  run  and  that  the  question  of  its 
renewal  had  not  to  be  decided  on  the  spot.  In  the  meantime  Mr. 
Harding  invited  representatives  of  the  powers  to  meet  him  in 
Washington  to  discuss  the  disarmament  question,  and  the  general 
outcome  of  that  Conference  was  all  for  the  establishment  of  peace, 
even  if  each  power  concerned  thought  that  its  own  sacrifices  had 
been  disproportionate. 

There  always  will  be,  between  peoples  sharing  a  frontier,  minor 
sources  of  irritation,  and  there  always  will  be  hasty  people  who 
will  try  to  make  of  mere  incidents  sources  of  international  trouble. 
There  are  always  some  fools  who  will  smoke  in  a  garage.  But  in 
the  big  things  we  must  co-operate.  We  can  remain  loyal  to  our 
own  flags  while  striving  to  see  issues  from  varying  standpoints. 
The  future  is  unquestionably  with  this  northern  continent.  We 
are  responsible,  between  us,  not  only  for  the  standards  of  political 
ethics  over  this  vast  geographical  area,  but  freed  as  we  are  from 
so  many  of  the  complications  of  Old  World  history,  we  can  be  and 
ought  to  be  the  most  powerful  agency  in  the  maintenance  of  world 
peace .     That  unguarded  frontier  should  be  a  parable  as  well  as  a  fact . 

R.  Bruce  Taylor 


REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS 

The  Plattshurg  Movement.  By  Ralph  Barton  Perry.  (New 
York:  E.  P.  Button  &  Company.     1921.     Pp.  x,  275.) 

There  is  a  prevailing  impression,  which  this  book  will  correct, 
that  Plattshurg  was  the  original  summer  training  camp  for  stu- 
dents of  educational  institutions,  designed  for  increasing  the 
inadequate  personnel  of  the  trained  military  reserve  from  which 
commissioned  officers  might  be  drawn  in  time  of  national  emer- 
gency. As  a  matter  of  fact  in  May,  1913,  Major  General  Leonard 
Wood,  then  Chief  of  Staff,  proposed  the  plan  to  the  university  and 
college  presidents  of  the  country.  As  result  two  camps  were  held 
in  the  summer  of  1913,  one  at  Monterey,  California,  and  the  other 
at  Gettysburg,  Pennsylvania. 

The  Lusitania  outrage,  May  8,  1915,  led  to  the  assemblage  of  a 
committee  of  citizens  at  the  Harvard  Club  in  New  York  City 
late  in  the  same  month,  at  which  General  Wood  was  the  principal 
speaker.  Provisional  arrangements  were  made  for  recruiting  for 
a  camp  to  be  established  at  Plattshurg  barracks  in  August  1915 
and  the  Plattsbtu*g  movement  was  started. 

From  this  point  Professor  Perry  carries  on  his  story,  describing 
the  first  Plattshurg  citizens'  camp,  the  organization  of  the  Mili- 
tary Training  Camp  Association,  the  military  legislation  of  1915- 
16,  the  camps  of  1916,  the  plans  for  1917,  the  military  policy  on 
the  eve  of  war  and  the  draft,  the  first  officers'  training  camps, 
the  procurement  of  officers  during  the  war,  the  wonderful  work 
of  the  M.T.C.A.,  dining  the  war. 

The  most  important  chapter  in  the  book  is  the  last,  which  is 
entitled  "Future  Policy."  The  author  makes  a  forceful  plea  to 
the  end  that  the  Plattshurg  idea  and  its  influence  may  not  be 
lost  to  future  generations.  He  shows  that  at  Plattshurg  was 
worked  out  a  plan  by  which  a  large  number  of  reserve  officers 
might  be  regularly  trained  with  the  greatest  economy  of  time  and 
economy  of  expenditure.  The  young  men  of  education  in  business 
and  in  the  professions  not  only  acquire  great  personal  physical 
benefit  for  themselves  by  attending  such  a  camp,  but  are  put  in 
the  way  of  rendering  the  greatest  service  to  their  coimtry  in  times 

179 


180  REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS 

of  danger.  Some  people  who  are  prejudiced  against  militaty 
training  may  be  brought  to  reaHze  the  value  of  the  discipline  and 
physical  uplift  that  a  summer  camp  gives.  It  is  to  the  glory  of 
New  York  State  that  the  Plattsburg  movement  had  its  greatest 
growth  within  her  boundaries,  and  she  owes  it  to  the  future  to 
see  that  the  idea  does  not  die. 

In  speaking  of  the  growth  of  the  present  system,  by  which 
the  army  is  to  be  made  a  school  of  learning  in  general  as  well  as 
one  for  military  training,  Professor  Perry  does  not  seem  to  be 
aware  of  the  fact  that  the  Educational  Commission  for  the  Army 
overseas,  established  and  financed  originally  by  the  Y.M.C.A., 
and  then  finally  taken  over  by  the  government,  was  more  re- 
sponsible for  it  than  any  other  agency.  The  plan  by  which  edu- 
cational work  should  be  done  with  men  back  of  the  lines  in  France 
and  during  the  period  of  demobilization  was  first  broached  in 
September,  1917,  at  a  meeting  at  the  University  Club  in  New 
York  attended  by  Anson  Phelps  Stokes,  John  H.  Finley,  Captain 
Ferdinand  Baldensperger  and  James  Sullivan.  The  first  of  these 
went  to  France  early  in  the  following  year.  It  was  through  his 
tmtiring  efforts  that  John  R.  Mott  of  the  Y.M.C.A.,  was  brought 
to  see  the  possibilities  of  the  plan  and  that  the  army  officials 
reluctantly  gave  their  consent  to  the  experiment.  Eminently 
successful  in  some  places  and  a  failure  in  others,  it  was  neverthe- 
less so  much  of  a  success  that  in  April  1919,  the  work  was  turned 
over  to  the  War  Department,  and  Secretary  Baker,  under  date 
of  Aprils,  1919,  wrote  a  letter  to  William  Sloane  of  the  Y.M.C.A. 
expressing  thanks  to  Mr.  Stokes  for  initiating  the  movement  and 
to  the  others  for  helping  him  in  its  execution. 

From  that  time  to  the  present  the  army  authorities  have  been 
carrying  out  the  ideas  of  the  Educational  Commission,  but  un- 
fortunately no  word  outside  of  Secretary  Baker's  letter  mentioned 
above  has  ever  been  given  to  indicate  who  was  responsible  for 
the  initiation  of  the  plans.  Knowing  the  army  as  we  do,  we 
may  be  certain  that  no  regular  army  officer  would  ever  have 
originated  the  idea  or  the  plan. 

David  Hummell  Greer.  By  Charles  Lewis  Slattery.  (New 
York:  Longmans,  Green  and  Co.  1921.  Pp.  xiii,  328.  Table 
of  contents  and  index.     Illustrations). 


REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS  181 

Dr.  Greer,  the  eighth  bishop  of  New  York,  was  bom  in  Wheehng, 
Virginia  (now  West  Virginia),  in  1844.  He  became  identified 
with  New  York  City  when  he  began  his  rectorship  at  St.  Bar- 
tholomew's in  November,  1888,  and  from  that  time  imtil  his 
death  in  1919,  he  was  closely  connected  with  the  religious  and 
civic  work  of  the  metropolis.  He  it  was  who  inspired  the  won- 
derful neighborhood  work  done  by  St.  Bartholomew's  Parish 
House  and  who  was  responsible  for  the  erection  of  the  Bronx 
Church  House. 

Mr.  Slattery  writes  this  biography  in  a  sympathetic  manner 
and  pleasing  style.  The  pages  are  frequently  taken  up  with 
letters  and  opinions  of  friends  of  Bishop  Greer  which  give  an 
intimate  view  of  his  life. 

Washington  Irving  and  Other  Essays.  By  Charles  Anson 
Ingraham.  (Cambridge,  New  York.  Privately  printed.  1922. 
Pp.  281). 

Besides  the  essay  on  Irving  there  are  several  in  this  voltune  of 
special  interest  to  New  Yorkers,  namely  those  on  James  Feni- 
more  Cooper,  the  Prime  Family  and  the  Ultimate  Aim  of  History. 

Mr.  Ingraham  shows  warm  sympathy  in  treating  of  the  per- 
sonal characteristics  of  the  two  men  mentioned  above.  Even 
for  the  irascible  Cooper  and  his  nimierous  lawsuits,  he  has  a 
good  word  when  he  says  that  he  "was  free  from  those  ill-favored 
manners  and  expressions  which  are  so  common  in  court  proceed- 
ings." 

The  essay  on  the  Prime  family  is  somewhat  in  the  natiire  of  a 
biographical  genealogy  of  this  important  Long  Island  family, 
which  also  played  an  important  part  in  the  history  of  Cambridge, 
New  York,  Mr.  Ingraham's  home  town. 

The  World  War.  Selective  Service  in  the  County  of  Albany  in 
the  State  of  New  York.  April  6,  1917— November  11,  1918. 
[By  the  Home  Defense  Committee  of  the  County  of  Albany]. 
(Albany:  J.  B.  Lyon  Company:  1922.     Pp.  142.     Illustrations). 

The  first  words  of  the  title  of  this  work  are  rather  misleading 
unless  read  in  connection  with  the  supplementary  title.  The 
first  forty-four  pages  of  this  volume  are  taken  up  with  the  various 
proclamations  of  President  Wilson  announcing  the  existence  of  a 


182  REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS 

state  of  war  with  Germany  and  the  inauguration  of  the  draft. 
The  next  forty-eight  pages  are  occupied  with  an  account  of  the 
beginning  of  the  draft  in  Albany  County  and  the  statistical  re- 
ports of  the  various  local  boards  in  the  County  and  in  the  City  of 
Albany.  The  ages  and  color  of  the  drafters,  the  rejections,  the 
ailments  revealed  as  a  result  of  medical  examinations,  and  nu- 
merous statistics  are  given. 

The  remaining  pages  are  somewhat  unnecessarily  taken  up 
with  the  armistice  agreements  and  their  continuance,  the  joint 
resolution  of  Congress  terminating  a  state  of  war  between  Ger- 
many and  Austria  and  the  United  States  and  the  final  terms  of 
the  treaty  of  peace  with  Germany.  The  last  fifty  pages  might 
have  been  taken  up  with  more  profit  with  some  narrative  ac- 
count of  incidents  happening  in  the  actual  working  of  the  draft. 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

PERSONAL 

William  Abbatt  of  Tarrytown,  editor  and  publisher  of  the 
Magazine  of  History  and  author  of  The  Crisis  of  the  Revolution, 
and  The  Battle  of  Pell's  Point,  has  put  into  illustrated  lecture  form 
his  "Story  of  Arnold  and  Andr^"  and  "Arnold's  Expedition  to 
Quebec." 

Professor  A.  Eekhof  of  Leyden  University,  Holland,  makes  an 
appeal  to  American  historical  societies  and  individuals  to  notify 
him  if  they  have  any  original  letters  of  Hugo  Grotius,  whose 
writings  he  is  editing. 

Frank  W.  Thomas,  an  attorney  of  Troy,  who  died  April  3, 
1922,  was  an  expert  in  land  titles  and  rents  and  as  such  was 
thoroughly  familiar  with  the  histories  of  the  Vanderheyden  and 
van  Rensselaer  families. 

On  June  14,  1922,  there  was  celebrated  at  Stone  Arabia  the 
two-hundredth  anniversary  of  the  founding  of  the  first  Palatine 
settlement  in  the  Mohawk  Valley.  Miss  Edith  Laning  had 
charge  of  the  details.  Dr.  W.  N.  P.  Dailey  presided.  Dr.  James 
Sullivan,  the  State  Historian,  and  W.  Pierrepont  White,  Presi- 
dent of  the  Mohawk  Valley  Historical  Association,  gave  addresses. 
These  were  published  in  the  Amsterdam  Recorder  in  its  issue  of 
June  15,  1922. 

The  150th  anniversary  of  the  establishment  of  Tryon  County 
was  celebrated  at  Johnstown  on  September  8  and  9,  1922,  by  the 
presentation  of  a  very  fine  series  of  pageants. 

At  Homell  on  July  4th  in  the  Maple  City  fairgrotmds  is  to  be 
given  an  elaborate  historical  pageant  which  will  show  the  history 
of  the  Canisteo  Valley.  Two  thousand  school  students  and  their 
elders  will  take  part.  It  is  under  the  general  direction  of  Henry  F. 
Burt. 

The  centennial  of  General  Grant's  birthday,  April  27,  1922, 
was  celebrated  in  the  schools  throughout  the  state. 

183 


184  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

HISTORICAL    SOCIETIES    AND    CLUBS 

The  Board  of  Supervisors  of  Schenectady  County  has  leased 
the  former  county  clerk's  building  to  the  Schenectady  Historical 
Society  for  fifteen  years  at  the  nominal  rent  of  a  dollar  a  year. 
The  same  Board  has  erected  a  monument  to  the  Spanish  War 
veterans  and  has  voted  $750  towards  the  support  of  the  Schenec- 
tady Historical  Society. 

On  June  23-24,  1922,  the  William  Floyd  Chapter  (Troy,  New 
York)  Sons  of  the  Revolution  made  an  excursion  to  Fort  Ticon- 
deroga.     Mr.  F.  B.  Richards  of  Glens  Falls  acted  as  guide. 

Mr.  H.  N.  W.  Magill,  formerly  so  well  known  in  the  Dutchess 
County  Historical  Society,  has  been  instrumental  in  organizing 
the  Suwasset  Historical  Society  at  Port  Jefferson,  Long  Island. 
Mr.  Magill  is  president  and  Mrs.  Cornelia  A.  Moger,  secretary. 

At  the  Hendrick  Hudson  Chapter  of  the  D.A.R.,  at  Hudson 
on  February  23,  1922,  Dr.  James  Sullivan,  State  Historian,  spoke 
on:  "The  Return  of  George  Washington." 

The  Huntington  Historical  Society  held  its  regular  monthly 
meeting  on  February  20,  1922.  Mrs.  Frank  W.  Rogers  read  a 
paper. 

At  the  meeting  of  the  William  Floyd  Chapter,  Sons  of  the 
Revolution,  of  Troy,  on  February  22,  1922,  Dr.  James  SulUvan, 
State  Historian,  spoke  on:  "What  Would  George  Washington 
Think  of  Our  Spiritual  Life?" 

The  Kings  Cotmty  Historical  Society  held  its  eleventh  annual 
banquet  on  April  5,  1922.  Colonel  Sidney  Grant,  formerly  of  the 
Fifty-ninth  Coast  Artillery  Corps,  exhibited  a  collection  of  war 
material  from  the  A.  E.  F. 

At  the  meeting  of  the  Rochester  Historical  Society  on  March  13, 
1922,  Dr.  Rossiter  Johnson  spoke  on  "Rochester  in  Literature." 
Part  of  the  address  was  published  in  the  Rochester  Post  Express 
of  March  14.  At  the  April  24th  meeting  views  by  Edward  S. 
Siebert  were  exhibited  under  the  caption  of  "Picturesque  Roches- 
ter." 

The  Amsterdam  chapter  of  the  D.  A.  R.,  held  its  meeting  on 
March  18,  1922,  at  Guy  Park  house.  Dr.  James  Sullivan,  the 
State  Historian,  gave  a  biographical  sketch  of  Guy  Johnson. 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  185 

At  the  May  23d  meeting  of  the  Glens  Falls  Colony  of  New 
England  Women,  Dr.  James  Sullivan  spoke  on  the  topic:  "Shall 
Our  History  Texts  be  Rewritten  to  Suit  Our  Immigrant  Nation- 
alities?" 

The  Albion  Historical  Club  celebrated  its  semicentennial  on 
April  4,   1922. 

The  Suffolk  County  Historical  Society  at  its  meeting  in  May 
elected  Eversley  Child  as  president. 

The  Livingston  County  Historical  Association  met  at  Letch- 
worth  Park  May  26,  1922.  The  enlargement  of  the  log  cabin 
museum,  which  is  over  crowded,  and  the  resumption  of  the  issue 
of  the  publications  of  the  association  were  taken  up. 

The  Genesee  County  Federation  held  a  field  day  at  Letchworth 
Park  on  May  26th. 

PUBLICATIONS,   BOOKS,   ARTICLES,   MANUSCRIPTS. 

The  Evening  Gazette  of  Port  Jervis  in  its  issue  of  July  26,  1922, 
carries  the  Story  of  John  Wood  in  the  Battle  oj  Minisink  by  William 
H.  Nearpass. 

In  the  April  1922  nvmiber  of  the  Ohio  Archaeological  and  His- 
torical Quarterly  are  two  articles  of  interest  to  New  Yorkers: 
Seneca  John,  Indian  Chief,  by  Basil  Meek,  and  Othniel  Looker, 
who  was  bom  in  New  York  State  in  1757  and  fought  in  the  Revo- 
lutionary War.  In  the  same  number  there  is  a  Character  Sketch 
of  General  Ulysses  S.  Grant  by  Judge  H.  S.  Nichols. 

The  Historical  Section  of  the  Staten  Island  Institute  has 
appointed  a  committee  consisting  of  Mr.  Charles  W.  Leng,  Mr. 
Edward  C.  Delevan,  Jr.,  and  Mr.  R.  W.  Vosburgh  to  compile  a 
history  and  survey  of  the  records  of  the  churches  of  Staten  Island. 
In  making  this  survey  the  committee  has  discovered  in  private 
hands:  Northfield  town  records,  vol.  1,  1784-1823;  Westfield 
town  records,  1757-1819,  1800-1816,  1818-1844;  and  records  of 
the  Westfield  School  District  No.  1,  1822-1890. 

The  Rochester  Historical  Society  and  the  New  York  Historical 
Society  are  both  making  appeals  for  historical  relics  and  manu- 
scripts which  are  so  frequently  cast  away  from  old  garrets  and 
have  much  value. 


186  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

The  Book  of  the  Museum,  the  title  of  volume  XXV  of  the  Pub- 
lications of  the  Buffalo  Historical  Society,  1921,  which  has  re- 
cently appeared,  is  such  a  compendium  of  information  that  it  is 
difficult  to  say  anything  about  it  without  listing  its  contents. 
Some  285  pages  are  devoted  to  a  trip  through  the  Museimi, 
during  which  various  articles  on  exhibition  are  described  through 
the  medium  of  short  essays.  Among  the  most  important  of  these 
are:  "The  Old  Niagara  Car;"  "The  Original  Typewriter;"  "The 
Tablet  of  the  City  of  Ararat"  [a  refuge  for  the  Jews  on  Grand 
Island];  "The  Great  West  Point  Chain;"  "Old  King  Hendrick;" 
"The  John  Johnston;"  "The  Buffalo  Theater  Cup;"  "Historic 
Wampum;"  "A  Relic  of  Our  First  School;"  "Red  Jacket  Relics;" 
"The  Trial  of  Andre;"  "The  Fenian  Raid  of  '66."  Several  pages 
are  devoted  to  the  Allegheny  [Allegany]  State  Park.  Niunerous 
illustrations  accompany  the  volimie. 

In  the  Proceedings  iq20-iQ2I  of  the  Massachusetts  Historical 
Society,  volume  54,  page  331,  is  an  interesting  article  on  "Ward 
Chipman,  Loyalist,  who  spent  much  of  his  time  in  New  York  City 
during  the  Revolution.  Some  of  the  letters  he  wrote  from  there 
are  given.  There  is  also  (p.  50)  an  article  on  "The  King's  Woods" 
which  is  interesting  as  dealing  with  early  attempts  at  controlling 
the  forests  in  the  interests  of  the  navy. 

Paul  Livingston  Keil  of  4282  Park  Avenue,  New  York  City, 
has  published  an  interesting  little  booklet  entitled:  Arrowheads 
and  Such. 

The  Evening  Standard  of  New  Rochelle,  under  date  of  March 
24,  1922,  carries  an  article  by  Mrs.  R.  A.  Niehaus  on  Colonial 
Days  and  Figures  in  New  Rochelle. 

In  The  Daily  Star  of  New  Rochelle,  March  24,  1922,  is  an  ac- 
count of  a  pageant  which  that  city  is  to  hold  on  June  24. 

Miss  Clara  Pierce  of  Manchester,  New  York,  has  in  her  posses- 
sion the  muster  roll  of  Captain  Nathan  Pierce's  Company  of 
Green  Mountain  Boys  in  the  regiment  commanded  by  Colonel 
Seth  Warner  at  the  siege  of  Quebec  in  1776.  This  is  printed  in 
the  April  1922,  number  of  The  New  England  Historical  and  Gen- 
ealogical Record. 

The  D.  A.  R.  Magazine  for  April  1922  contains  an  account  of 
the  activities  of  the  Gan-e-o-di-ya  Chapter  (Caledonia,  N.  Y.). 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  187 

The  locations  of  several  graves  of  revolutionary  soldiers  are  given. 

In  The  New  York  Historical  Society  Quarterly  Bulletin,  for  April, 
1922,  Dr.  W.  S.  Thomas  begins  his  catalogue  of  "American 
Revolutionary  Diaries."  Those  by  Andros,  Angell,  Atlee, 
Baldwin  (Jeduthan),  Barlow,  Barton,  Beatty,  (Erkuries;  William), 
Beekman  (Mrs.  C;  Tyerck),  and  Berry,  relate  to  New  York. 
In  the  same  issue  is  an  illustration  said  to  be  of  Sir  William  John- 
son's chair  which  he  is  said  to  have  brought  from  England  and 
gave  to  Colonel  James  Livingston.  There  is  considerable  doubt 
about  these  statements.  Johnson,  a  poor  youth  who  came  to 
this  country  from  Ireland  for  his  uncle  in  1737  or  thereabouts, 
scarcely  brought  any  such  handsome  impedimenttun  with  him, 
and  he  certainly  never  subsequently  returned  to  Ireland  or  Eng- 
land after  coming  over  here  to  be  able  to  "bring"  any  such  fur- 
niture. He  may  have  had  it  sent  over.  His  relations  with  the 
Livingston  family  were  anything  but  friendly  and  there  is  nothing 
in  all  his  correspondence  to  show  that  James  Livingston  was  his 
friend.  The  Society  announces  the  giving  of  a  lectin"e  on  "Early 
New  York  Theatres,"  the  acquisition  of  a  series  of  views  of  New 
York  City  published  by  Hoff  in  1850  and  of  a  miniature  of  Evert 
Bancker  (1721-1803). 

The  Fort  Plain  Standard  of  March  30,  1922,  has  an  article  by 
Nelson  Greene  on  Fort  Rensselaer,  which  he  shows  was  the  official 
military  title  of  Fort  Plain  from  1780  until  1786.  He  proves 
conclusively  that  it  is  an  error  to  say  that  Fort  Rensselaer  was  at 
the  site  of  the  present  village  of  Canajoharie.  In  the  issue  of  the 
same  paper  for  April  13,  1922,  there  is  an  article  on  The  First  [Mo- 
hawk] Valley  Settler,  Cornelius  Antonsen  Van  Slyck.  There  is 
also  much  material  about  Mohawk  Castles  from  1634-1666. 

The  History  of  the  Seventy-Eighth  Division  in  the  World  War, 
iQi7-iQig,  edited  by  Thomas  F.  Meehan,  has  been  published  by 
Dodd,  Mead,  and  Company,  New  York. 

The  Township  System:  A  Documentary  History  of  the  Endeavor 
to  establish  a  Township  School  System  in  the  State  of  New  York 
and  Free  Schools:  A  Documentary  History  of  the  Free  School 
Movement  in  New  York  State,  both  edited  by  Thomas  E.  Finegan, 
have  been  published  by  the  New  York  State  Department  of 
Education. 


188  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

The  Archaeological  History  of  New  York  by  Arthur  C.  Parker, 
Archeologist,  Part  I,  has  just  been  issued  by  the  University  of  the 
State  of  New  York,  Albany,  1922. 

In  the  Journal  of  American  Genealogy  for  April,  May,  June, 
1921,  is  an  account  of  the  Montgomery  family,  of  which  General 
Richard  Montgomery  of  New  York  was  a  member,  and  of  the 
Dubois  family,  members  of  which  were  prominent  in  Ulster  County. 
In  the  issue  for  January,  February,  and  March  of  the  same  year 
appears  an  article  on  l^ital  Records  from  Old  New  York  News- 
papers. 

The  Union  Presbyterian  Church,  Endicott,  N.  Y.,  is  the  title  of  a 
local  history  pamphlet  which  traces  the  history  of  the  church 
from  1822-1922.     Numerous  illustrations  are  given. 

In  the  Bulletin  of  the  New  York  Public  Library  for  April  1922,  is 
given  (pp.  260  ff.),  an  extensive  list  of  the  acquisitions  by  gift  or 
purchase  made  by  the  manuscript  division  during  the  year.  Some 
of  the  most  important  are  letters  of  Robert  R.  Livingston  (1755- 
1794),  the  Journals  of  John  Lincklaen  (1791-1792)  and  letters 
addressed  to  Fernando  Wood  by  various  prominent  men  (1859- 
1861  and  1870-1871). 

Chauncey  M.  Depew  in  the  current  issues  of  Scribner's  Magazine 
is  writing  Leaves  from  My  Autobiography.  He  has  also  published 
in  book  form  My  Memories  of  Eighty  Years,  Scribner,  New  York 
City. 

Lawrence  F.  Abbott  has  published  Impressions  of  Theodore 
Roosevelt,  Doubleday,  Page  and  Co.,  Garden  City,    New  York. 

In  the  pamphlet  entitled  Accessions  of  Manuscripts,  Broadsides 
and  British  Transcripts,  July  1,  1920 — December  31,  1921, 
published  by  the  Library  of  Congress,  is  to  be  found  much  material 
relating  to  New  York. 

In  the  Proceedings  of  the  New  Jersey  Historical  Society  for  April, 
1922,  is  an  article  on  Travel  Across  New  Jersey  in  the  Eighteenth 
Century  and  Later  by  W.  H.  Benedict  which  gives  a  great  deal  of 
information  as  to  routes  between  New  York  City  and  Philadel- 
phia. 

Charles  Cummins  Horton  and  George  A.  Miller  are  noted  in  the 
October,  1921,  Annals  of  Iowa  as  two  New  Yorkers  who  went  out 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  189 

to  Iowa  in  the  middle  of  the  nineteenth  century  and  became 
prominent  in  that  state's  affairs. 

The  Rochester  Historical  Society  has  published  a  book  entitled: 
Henry  A.  Ward,  Reminiscence  and  Appreciation,  by  Rev.  A.  H. 
Strong  including  an  Appreciation  of  Doctor  Strong. 

In  the  1920  issue  of  the  Annual  Publications  of  the  Historical 
Society  of  Southern  California  there  is  an  article  on  The  Henry  E. 
Huntington  Library  by  George  Watson  Cole.  There  is  in  it  much 
material  relating  to  New  York  both  in  book  and  manuscript 
form. 

The  Wisconsin  Magazine  of  History  for  June,  1922,  has  an  article 
on  Marshall  Mason  Strong,  Racine  Pioneer,  who  originally  came 
from  New  York.  Another  article  is  Charles  Minton  Baker's 
Journal,  which  describes  his  journey  across  New  York  State  in 
1838.  Reference  is  made  by  the  editor  to  a  similar  journal  by 
A.  A.  Parker,  Trip  to  the  West  and  Texas,  1834-5  published  at 
Concord,  N.  H.,  1835.  In  the  same  issue  there  is  a  communica- 
tion about  the  Stockbridge  Indians  and  information  about  the 
diary  of  Eli  Stilson  who  came  from  New  York. 

In  the  January-June,  1922,  issue  of  The  Quarterly  Publication 
of  the  Historical  and  Philosophical  Society  of  Ohio,  appear  the 
Memoirs  of  Benjamin  Van  Cleve,  edited  by  Beverley  W.  Bond,  Jr., 
which  contain  some  material  about  New  York  City  in  1792. 
The  usual  route  from  Philadelphia  to  New  York  City  at  that  time 
seems  to  have  been  via  Bristol,  Trenton,  Princeton,  New  Bruns- 
wick, Woodbridge,  Elizabethtown,  Newark  and  Paulushook 
Ferry. 

From  the  News  Letter  of  the  National  Society  of  the  United 
States  Daughters  of  1812  for  June  1922,  it  is  found  that  that 
society  is  having  copied  from  the  government  library  at  Ottawa 
material  relating  to  the  American  prisoners  of  war  of  some  2,000 
to  3,000  folios. 

In  the  Rochester  Times  Union  for  February  25,  1922  appears  an 
article  on  the  history  of  the  Female  Charitable  Society  founded  in 
1922  in  Rochester. 

The  Linlithgo  Reformed  Church  of  Livingston,  Columbia  County, 
is  the  title  of  a  little  pamphlet  tracing  the  history  of  this  important 
church  and  congregation  from  1722-1922. 


190  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

The  Mystery  of  Muller  Hill  is  the  title  of  an  interesting  pam- 
phlet published  by  Warren  W.  Ames  of  De  Ruyter,  New  York,  in 
1902,  and  purporting  to  show  that  Louis  Anathe  Muller,  who 
bought  some  twenty-seven  hundred  acres  of  land  in  Georgetown, 
Madison  County,  in  1808,  was  none  other  than  the  Count  of 
Artois,  subsequently  Charles  X,  King  of  France. 

History  of  Masonry  in  Cazenovia  is  the  title  of  a  pamphlet 
published  by  the  Republican  Press  at  Cazenovia  in  1906,  to  give 
an  account  of  the  centennial  celebration  of  the  establishment  of 
the  Cazenovia  Lodge,  1799-1899. 

The  Part  Brooklyn  Played  in  Helping  Slaves  is  the  title  of  an 
illustrated  article  in  the  Brooklyn  Standard  Union  of  May  7,  1922. 

In  the  Brooklyn  Eagle  for  February  26,  1922,  there  is  an  article 
on  the  Bull  Rider  Smith  Legend  in  connection  with  the  founding  of 
Smithtown,  Long  Island,  by  Richard  Smythe  or  Smith. 

The  Rochester  Democrat  and  Chronicle  in  its  issue  of  April  2, 
1922,  carries  an  article  on  an  old  house  built  over  a  century  ago. 
It  is  soon  to  be  razed. 

In  the  Utica  Observer  for  May  5,  1922,  appears  a  history  of 
the  Dicksville  school  district  which  was  organized  in  1834. 

The  Kings  County  Historical  Society  has  acquired  the  Teunis 
G,  Bergm  collection  of  maps,  surveys,  documents,  letters  and 
memorabilia  which  largely  relate  to  the  county. 

In  a  little  folder  entitled  Historically  What  Occurred  at  Fort 
Ticonderoga,  which  is  given  with  the  compliments  of  the  Fort 
Ticonderoga  Musetmi,  it  is  stated  that  the  first  American  flag 
ever  used  in  actual  engagement  was  flung  to  the  breeze  at  Fort 
Ticonderoga.  The  best  proofs  available  do  not  warrant  this 
statement  at  all,  as  those  presented  for  Ft.  Stanwix  at  Rome  rest 
on  a  more  secure  foundation. 

MUSEUMS,    HISTORIC   MONUMENTS  AND   REMAINS 

The  New  York  State  College  of  Forestry  at  Syracuse  is  offering 
ten  prizes  for  the  best  photographs  of  the  trees  of  greatest  his- 
torical significance  within  New  York  State.  The  photographs 
must  be  accompanied  by  exact  data  and  proofs. 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  191 

White  Plains  now  has  a  tree  recorded  in  the  American  Forest- 
ry Association  Hall  of  Fame  for  trees,  with  a  history,  at  Washing- 
ton, D.  C. 

The  nomination  was  made  by  Mrs.  Jeremiah  T.  Lockwood  and 
the  tree  is  the  magnificent  sycamore  at  Washington's  Headquar- 
ters. This  tree  is  of  unusual  spread  and  height,  is  in  perfect 
state  of  preservation  and  is  estimated  by  experts  to  be  at  least 
300  years  old.  Its  measurements  are  as  follows:  height,  100 
feet;  spread,  96  feet,  circumference  at  4^  feet  from  the  ground, 
13  feet  6  inches,  and  diameter,  4  feet  5  inches.  The  tree  stands 
close  to  the  house  that  was  General  Washington's  headquarters 
when  the  Battle  of  White  Plains  was  fought  on  October  28,  1776, 
and  again  his  headquarters  from  July  16th  to  September  2,  1778. 
This  tree  shaded  from  the  western  sun  the  windows  of  the  room 
occupied  by  General  Washington.  Under  its  branches  many 
distinguished  men  have  passed,  among  them  being  General 
Alexander  Hamilton,  Governor  George  Clinton,  the  Count  de 
Rochambeau,  General  Lafayette,  the  Duke  de  Lauzun,  General 
Israel  Putnam,  Aaron  Burr,  General  Charles  Lee  and  James 
Monroe.  At  this  headquarters  many  important  military  con- 
ferences were  held  by  General  Washington. 

At  Chimney  Point  in  Vermont  William  R.  Barnes  is  said  to  have 
in  his  yard  the  remains  of  the  Congress,  to  which  Arnold  made  his 
escape  after  the  battle  of  Valcour  Island. 

Some  2,100  people  visited  Washington's  Headquarters  at  White 
Plains  during  the  1921  season.  The  desk  chair  used  by  Wash- 
ington in  this  house  has  recently  been  acquired  through  the  gift 
from  the  late  R.  Guy  McLean  of  New  York  City. 

The  Montgomery  County  Historical  Society  held  a  meeting  on 
June  10,  1922.  A  photographic  copy  of  a  newly  discovered  oil 
painting  of  Sir  William  Johnson  was  presented  by  Dr.  John  M. 
Clarke,  Director  of  the  State  Museum,  who  also  made  an  address. 

The  Legislature  at  its  last  session  appropriated  $4,000  for 
roads  and  repairs  on  the  Bennington  Battlefield  Park. 


192  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

In  Elmira  at  the  comer  of  West  Water  Street  and  Guinnip 
Avenue  is  said  to  be  a  frame  house  which  served  as  a  morgue 
during  the  Civil  War,  when  so  many  southern  soldiers  were  im- 
prisoned at  Elmira. 

In  the  Knickerbocker  Press  of  Albany  for  March  12,  1922,  there 
is  an  account  of  a  ballot  box  said  to  have  been  used  by  Gates  at 
Saratoga  when  a  vote  of  the  officers  was  taken  as  to  whether  the 
army  would  attack  the  British  or  besiege  them. 

The  Board  of  Trustees  of  the  village  of  Fort  Edward  are  plan- 
ning to  improve  and  purchase  the  old  burying  ground  made  famous 
by  the  graves  of  Major  Duncan  Campbell,  Jane  McCrea  and 
Sarah  McNeil. 

The  Oneida  Historical  Society  has  recently  received  many 
additions  to  its  museimi  collections,  the  most  important  being  a 
map    of    Whitestown    in    1806. 

The  Old  Brook  School  road  at  Maspeth,  Long  Island  is  to  be 
closed.  It  first  appears  on  a  map  of  New  York  and  Staten  Island 
made  at  the  order  of  Sir  Henry  Clinton  in  1781.  An  article  on  it 
appears  in  the  Elmhurst  Register  for  April  22,  1922. 

The  Times  Union  of  Albany  is  advocating  the  erection  of  a 
State  Memorial  to  Theodore  Roosevelt  which  will  house  the  State 
Museimi  and  other  collections. 

The  Rochester  Historical  Society  has  under  way  a  plan  to  mark 
the  site  of  Try  on,  the  "lost  city  of  Irondequoit,"  on  June  10,  1922. 
An  article  about  it  appears  in  the  Rochester  Post  Express  of  May 
31,  1922. 

A  noteworthy  commemoration  took  place  in  the  old  Falley 
Seminary  building  at  Fulton  on  Jime  1st.  The  building  was 
dedicated  on  December  5,  1850  imder  the  name  Falley  Seminary, 
although  the  school  had  been  in  existence  as  an  incorporated  insti- 
tution, under  other  names,  since  May  25,  1836.  The  school 
closed  finally  in  1883.  As  it  is  intended  to  take  down  the  building 
and  erect  upon  its  site  a  high  school  structtu-e,  the  happy  idea  of  a 
reimion  of  teachers  and  students  was  conceived.  The  invitations 
drew  responses  from  more  than  four  hundred  persons,  once  con- 
nected with  the  seminary,  now  living  in  different  parts  of  the 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  193 

United  States,  and  about  two  hundred  and  fifty  met  in  the  semi- 
nary chapel  in  the  morning,  and  attended  the  banquet  in  the  even- 
ing. The  address  of  welcome  was  given  by  Mr.  Edwin  R.  Red- 
head, of  Fulton;  and  the  principal  address  at  the  banquet  was 
delivered  by  Rev.  Curtis  E.  Mogg,  of  Syracuse.  At  one  period 
Falley  Seminary  held  rank  among  the  leading  academies  in  this 
country. 

In  Waterloo  there  was  recently  discovered  an  old  poster  dated 
May  10,  1830,  which  gives  considerable  information  about  the 
fulling,  dyeing,  carding  and  dressing  establishment  of  Annanias 
Jenks.  It  was  printed  by  the  Seneca  Farmer,  a  newspaper  started 
in  Waterloo  in  1826.  An  article  about  this  appears  in  the  Roches- 
ter Democrat  and  Chronicle  for  May  3,  1922. 

A  revolutionary  cannon  ball  was  recently  dug  up  on  the  estate 
of  S.  A.  McClimg  of  Cherry  Valley. 

The  old  Ross  mansion  at  Elizabethtown  is  to  be  torn  down  to 
make  room  for  a  hotel.  The  New  York  Herald  of  May  7,  1922, 
and  the  Troy  Record  of  May  8th  printed  accounts  of  it. 

The  Society  of  Old  Brooklynites  appointed  a  committee  re- 
cently to  urge  the  purchase  and  preservation  of  the  land  bounded 
by  Fourth  and  Fifth  avenues  and  Third  and  Fifth  Streets  on  which 
a  part  of  the  battle  of  Long  Island  was  fought  in  1776. 

WORLD    WAR   MEMORIALS    AND   COLLECTIONS 

The  City  of  Yonkers  on  May  30,  1922,  tmveiled  a  memorial  to 
the  citizens  who  died  in  the  military  service  diuing  the  World  War. 

The  Montgomery  County  Historical  Society,  on  May  30,  1922, 
held  exercises  at  Fort  Johnson  to  dedicate  a  tablet  in  memory  of 
members  who  served  in  the  World  War. 

On  Sunday,  April  2,  1922,  there  were  held  in  Brooklyn,  very 
impressive  "Memorial  Services  for  the  War  Dead  from  Over- 
seas." The  occasion  was  the  arrival  of  the  transports  carrying 
over  one  thousand  of  the  bodies. 

The  Chemimg  Board  of  Supervisors  has  permitted  the  Ameri- 
can Legion  the  use  of  the  Scott  Baldwin  property  as  a  clubhouse. 

The  Board  of  Supervisors  in  each  county  is  by  statute  to  provide 
for  the  burial  of  an  honorably  discharged  soldier  or  his  wife  or 


194  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

widow,  when  sufficient  funds  are  not  left  for  the  burial,  and  also 
provide  for  a  suitable  marker. 

A  movement  is  on  foot  in  Brooklyn  to  enlarge  the  historic  park 
at  Flatbush  Avenue  and  Kings  Highway  and  use  it  for  a  World 
War  memorial  clubhouse  and  public  library. 

The  Patchogue  Advance  began  to  publish  in  its  February  17, 
1922  issue,  the  history  of  "Patchogue's  Part  in  the  World  War" 
as  prepared  by  the  local  historian,  Dr.  W.  E.  Gordon. 

The  Riverhead  Review,  in  its  issue  of  April  7,  1922,  publishes  a 
simunary  of  Colonel  David  E.  Gaddis's  history  of  the  part  played 
by  Riverhead  in  the  World  War. 

The  Suffolk  Times  is  publishing  the  "History  of  the  Village  of 
Greenport's  Part  in  the  World  War"  which  has  been  prepared  by 
Mrs.  Joseph  L.  Townsend,  local  historian. 

At  a  meeting  of  the  Monroe  County  Historical  Commission  on 
March  17,  1922,  the  American  Legion  of  that  county  gave  sanction 
to  the  work  which  the  commission  had  in  hand  of  compiling 
Monroe  County's  Part  in  the  World  War. 

Members  of  Base  Hospital  19  in  the  World  War  who  came  from 
Rochester  were  tendered  a  reception  at  the  city  Historian's 
office  in  Exposition  Park  on  March  28,  1922.  Each  member  was 
presented  with  a  history  of  the  unit  and  a  New  York  State  mili- 
tary medal. 


The 
Quarterly  Journal 


of  the 


New  York  State  Historical 
Association 


Volume  III  October   1922  Number  4 


Entered  as  second  class  mail   matter  October  22,    1919,   at  the   Post  Office   at   Albany,   New  York 
under  the  Act  of  August  24,  1912. 


NEW  YORK  STATE  HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION 

Quarterly  Journal 

Editorial  Committee 

JAMES  SULLIVAN,  Managing  Editor 
DIXON  R.  FOX  FREDERICK  B.  RICHARDS 


CONTENTS 

STATE  HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES      -        A.  H.  Shearer       195 

CALEDONIA  IN  THE  NATION'S  WARS 

-  -       -      -       -      -      -      -  Harriet  B.  Dow       205 

SOME  EARLY  DUTCH  MANUSCRIPTS 

A.  J.  F.  van  Laer      221 

AN  OGDENSBURG  LETTER  OF  1811 

-  -      -       -      -      -      -      -       Comfoii;  Williams      234 

OBITUARIES  ------       George  A.  Ingalls       238 

REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS       --------      267 

van  Laer,  Minutes  of  the  Court  of  Fort  Orange  and 
Beverwyck,  1652-16 56;  Byington,  The  Record  of  a 
Private. 

NOTES  AND  QUERIES     --------269 

STATEMENT     --------      .      -     -      -     2S0 


Subscription  Price  $1.50  Single  Numbers  40  cents 

Address  all  contributions  and  communications  to 
New   York    State  Historical  Association,  Albany 


VOL.  Ill  OCTOBER  1922  NO.  4 


1  he  (Quarterly  J  ournal 

of  the  New  York  State  Historical  Association 


STATE  HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES^ 

Some  years  ago  it  became  necessary  for  me  in  connection  with 
bibliographical  work  at  the  Newberry  Library  in  Chicago  to  at- 
tempt to  list  the  historical  societies  of  the  United  States  with  their 
publications,  and  it  was  surprising  to  note  about  545  of  them. 
This  list  was  nearly  complete  but  included  some  societies  which 
had  been  in  existence  but  either  were  definitely  dead  or  had  ceased 
to  function.  The  work  continued  for  about  five  years  in  connec- 
tion not  only  with  the  library  but  with  the  national  conference  of 
historical  societies.  In  the  course  of  it  not  only  the  names  and  the 
publications  of  the  societies  became  known  to  me  but  the  charac- 
teristics of  many  of  them,  and  you  who  have  known  many  local 
and  general  societies  doubtless  have  noted  the  same  characteristics. 
Professor  Jameson  recorded  some  of  his  impressions  on  the  subject 
at  the  conference  of  1908. 

In  thinking  of  the  local  societies  of  the  United  States,  I  think 
almost  every  observer  has  felt  that  there  has  been  a  great  waste 
of  effort,  which,  properly  directed,  would  have  put  us  much  further 
ahead  in  the  accumulation  of  historical  material  both  tangible  and 
intellectual,  and  would  have  prepared  broader  foundations  in  each 
generation  for  succeeding  generations  to  build  upon.  I  once  had 
the  idea  that  local  history  societies  were  made  up  of  small  groups 
of  scientific  historians  working  out  monographs  of  local  nature. 
But  how  rarely  is  that  the  case.  How  often  is  the  local  historical 
society  a  social  organization,  sometimes  exclusive  in  its  member- 
ship and  often  failing  to  touch  the  subject  of  history  at  all.  Music 
sometimes  occupies  the  program,  and  talks  on  current  events  or 


'Read  by  Mr.  A.  W.  Skinner  in  the  absence  of  Mr.  Shearer  at  the  Lake 
George  meeting  of  The  New  York  State  Historical  Association,  October,  1921. 


196  A.  H.  SHEARER 

descriptive  addresses  on  foreign  countries  are  considered  to  come 
under  the  designation  of  history.  Sometimes  these  societies  have 
good  collections  of  historical  material,  but  Mr.  Leland  tells  of 
cases  where  they  are  not  shown  to  any  except  members,  or  some- 
times the  keepers  are  the  only  ones  to  see  them.  Their  publi- 
cations are  sometimes  of  the  weirdest  character  historically,  as  for 
instance  in  one  of  the  state  publications  a  few  years  ago  in  each 
issue  there  appeared  a  poem  by  the  editor  and  the  subjects  were 
not  historical.  I  am  not  judging  the  poems  but  the  conception  of 
the  function  of  the  historical  society.  Fortunately  these  remarks 
do  not  apply  in  general  and  a  great  amount  of  good  work  has  been 
done  by  the  local  historical  societies  of  the  United  States,  however 
much  more  is  possible  of  accomplishment  in  the  future. 

Besides  the  purely  local  societies  of  which  many  of  you  are  mem- 
bers, there  are  some  general  societies  each  covering  a  different  sub- 
ject, and  hence  drawing  their  membership  from  widely  scattered 
parts  of  the  coimtry.  Such  are  the  societies  devoted  to  religious 
history  and  we  can  note  such  among  the  Catholics,  Presbyterians, 
Baptists,  Episcopalians,  Congregationalists,  Methodists,  Reformed 
and  Unitarians.  Such  also  are  the  racial  societies,  as  the  Hugue- 
not, Jewish,  Irish,  German  and  Negro.  There  are  also  military  and 
naval  historical  societies,  genealogical,  numismatic,  geographical, 
agricultural,  memorial,  pioneer,  and  the  frankly  antiquarian  and 
patriotic  societies,  each  working  in  its  own  field  and  in  some  cases 
most  excellently. 

But  it  is  not  particularly  to  the  local  or  specialized  societies  that 
I  wish  to  refer  but  to  the  state  societies  of  the  country,  some  of  them 
state  only  in  name,  others  in  actuality. 

The  earliest  of  all  the  historical  societies  in  the  United  States  was 
the  Massachusetts,  founded  in  1791.  Leisure  and  freedom  from 
poverty  had  come  to  men  of  cultural  instincts  so  that  the  desire 
to  form  a  library,  to  discuss  the  events  of  their  nearly  two  hundred 
years  of  history,  and  to  publish  their  discussions,  was  possible  of 
accomphshment.  The  Massachusetts  Society  has  become  repre- 
sentative of  one  type,  exclusive,  well  endowed,  doing  real  historical 
work  in  its  collections  and  publications. 

Next  came  the  New  York  Historical  Society  in  1804,  and  this 
developed  with  some  of  the  characteristics  of  the  earlier  society, 
that  is,  exclusiveness  in  membership,  a  large  endowment  and 


STATE  HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES  197 

collections,  and  excellent  publications.  Of  late  years  the  society 
has  been  considered  by  some  of  its  own  members  as  moribund, 
and  they  have  tried  to  rouse  it,  but  their  best  efforts  came  just  as 
the  war  opened,  and  the  society  remains  in  the  same  condition  as 
before.     In  no  sense  can  it  be  considered  a  state  society. 

The  Pennsylvania  society  was  formed  in  1825  with  similar 
characteristics.  It  will  be  noted  that  these  societies  started  in 
the  centers  of  population  as  soon  as  pioneer  conditions  had  passed 
and  a  certain  degree  of  wealth  and  leisure  had  appeared.  They 
were  not  the  first  of  the  "learned"  societies  by  any  means,  as  Frank- 
lin's Junto  and  the  American  Philosophical  Society  in  Philadelphia 
were  examples  of  earlier  ones,  but  altho  the  former  included  his- 
torical discussions  and  collections,  the  new  class  were  specifically 
historical.  The  Pennsylvania  society  developed  dift'erently  from 
the  earlier  two.  Despite  the  supposed  exclusiveness  of  Philadel- 
phia, the  historical  society  did  not  hold  restrictions  on  membership 
and  it  has  become  a  large  and  popular  institution.  Moreover  it 
has  demanded  and  received  gifts  from  the  state,  altho  entirely 
under  private  control. 

Throughout  the  eastern  states  societies  have  existed,  all  of  them 
of  reputation  so  that  not  only  the  person  really  interested  in  the 
history  of  his  state,  but  the  person  who  wanted  to  be  thought 
learned  or  civicly  minded  could  seek  membership.  There  was 
always  a  solid  working  membership  of  historically  minded  people, 
and  a  fringe  of  others  of  several  different  classes,  those  newly  rich 
who  wanted  to  improve  their  standing  in  various  ways,  those 
naturally  "joiners"  who  assumed  some  interest  in  history,  those 
of  standing  in  the  community  who  could  not  be  omitted  from  such 
an  organization,  altho  they  had  not  the  time  to  give  to  intensive 
work.  So  we  find  societies  in  Maine  where  very  vigorous  publica- 
tion activity  went  on  from  1831  to  recent  years;  in  New  Hamp- 
shire from  1823,  with  publications  but  moribund  or  rather  throt- 
tled until  Edward  Tuck  gave  a  new  building  a  few  years  ago  and 
still  not  tremendously  active ;  in  Vermont  where  it  is  really  a  state 
society,  but  as  such  lacks  cohesion  and  depends  on  central  execu- 
tives to  be  really  alive,  and  such  it  was  not  for  some  years;  in 
Rhode  Island,  from  1822 ;  in  New  Jersey,  where  though  nominally 
open,  it  is  really  somewhat  exclusive  and  practically  represents 
the  northern  part  of  the  state,  the  old  East  Jersey;  in  Delaware, 


198  A.  H.  SHEARER 

where  the  history  recording  spirit  was  strong  in  the  part  of  a  few, 
and  where  gaps  in  activity  have  occurred ;  in  Maryland,  where  the 
roll  of  names  of  members  is  almost  like  a  social  register,  but  where 
the  members  have  supported  earnestly  the  historically  inclined 
portion  of  their  numbers  in  real  contributions  to  history;  in  Vir- 
ginia, where  conditions  similar  to  Pennsylvania  have  existed,  with 
real  contributions  to  history;  in  South  Carolina,  from  1857;  and 
in  Georgia,  where  the  exclusiveness  in  recent  years  so  throttled 
historical  interests  among  those  really  interested,  that  despite 
earlier  noteworthy  contributions,  a  rival  organization  had  to  be 
formed,  modem  forms  of  activity,  and  a  final  result  was  the  uniting 
of  the  two  so  that  conditions  approach  more  nearly  the  ideal. 

Now  these  comments  are  not  to  be  gathered  from  the  printed 
annual  reports  where  such  still  appear,  nor  in  the  excellent  pub- 
lications of  some  of  them,  but  they  nevertheless  apply.  There 
may  be  no  objection  to  stating  that  a  restricted  membership  of  100 
acting  in  the  nature  of  trustees  is  the  best  possible  form  in  one  place 
or  that  2500  members  supporting  capable  officers  is  the  best  in 
another,  but  concerning  other  societies  self-satisfied  members  may 
be  resentful  at  hearing  their  society  spoken  of  as  moribund,  or 
antiquated,  or  inefficiently  exclusive. 

In  the  early  west,  societies  grew  up  on  the  eastern  models,  a 
group  in  Ohio,  the  Pioneer  and  Historical  Society  in  Michigan,  and 
societies  in  Kentucky,  Tennessee,  Alabama,  and  Mississippi.  Some 
are  still  active  in  their  former  way,  but  some  of  the  southern  socie- 
ties passed  through  the  post-bellimi  period  with  usual  difficulties 
and  have  revived  in  dift'erent  form. 

Then  came  the  new  kind  of  society,  the  product  of  the  central 
states.  It  has  been  a  development  and  to  those  who  think  that 
nothing  new  or  progressive  can  come  anywhere  except  from  the 
w^est,  it  will  seem  a  very  natural  thing.  What  I  refer  to  is  the 
state-supported  and  state-directed  society,  in  some  cases  supplant- 
ing the  individual^  organized  society  of  earlier  days,  especially  in 
the  states  of  New  England  origin  or  influence.  In  these  societies 
the  effort  or  trend  is  towards  securing  expert  service.  History 
becomes  a  function  of  the  state.  So  far  as  politics  or  personal 
consideration  does  not  interfere,  a  historian  must  be  secured  who 
will  comb  the  state's  records,  secure  books,  papers,  and  illustrative 
relics  for  the  collections,  publish  handsome  and  authoritative  vol- 


STATE  HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES  199 

umes,  all  at  the  state's  expense.  In  most  cases  there  is  nominally 
a  historical  society,  but  in  one  case  it  consists  of  only  nine  members, 
all  nominated  by  the  governor,  in  another  there  used  to  be  just  one 
man  interested,  and  he  was  paid  for  so  being.  State  pride  enters  in 
so  that  each  state's  historian  demands  appropriations,  and  the 
chief  object  of  comparison  is  the  publications  or  perhaps  of  salaries 
of  neighboring  states. 

Wisconsin  had  a  historical  society  from  1849  (reorganized  in 
1859).  It  was  made  up  of  individuals  interested  in  the  history  of 
their  state  and  of  the  places  back  east  where  they  came  from. 
Hence  the  society's  collections  include  many  genealogies  and  local 
histories.  This  applies  to  Minnesota  (1849)  also.  Wisconsin  be- 
came interested  in  the  society  and  as  in  many  things  later  the 
Wisconsin  State  Historical  Society  became  a  leader  in  the  new 
kind  of  organization.  Money  was  appropriated  for  a  building, 
for  acquisitions,  for  publications,  for  salaries.  There  are  now  a 
number  of  members,  (nominally  750),  but  the  main  concern  of  the 
curators  is  to  secure  a  librarian,  an  editor,  a  superintendent,  who 
will  take  the  affair  out  of  their  hands  and  keep  the  society  in  the 
forefront.  The  example  has  been  irresistible.  Minnesota  came 
to  the  same  point  in  1913.  The  reflex  was  felt  in  Michigan  where 
a  state  commission  of  history  with  a  secretary  was  established  in 
1913  and  took  over  the  practical  direction  of  the  Pioneer  and 
Historical  Society.  In  Iowa  the  process  was  different.  The  State 
Historical  Society  backed  by  the  University  left  the  field  of  museum 
and  library  to  the  Department  of  History  and  has  secured  control 
of  collecting  and  relating  the  history  of  the  state.  Kansas  and 
Nebraska  have  fallen  into  line,  and  South  Dakota  has  established 
a  state  department.  Wyoming  copied,  and  its  skeleton  society 
of  nine  members  includes  the  paid  state  historian.  In  the  South 
central  states,  two  men,  Thomas  M.  Owen  and  Dunbar  Rowland, 
secured  in  Alabama  and  Mississippi  the  state  support  which  en- 
abled them  to  do  the  same  work  as  the  North  central  states  had 
done,  and  which  the  voluntary  state  societies  would  not  have  been 
able  to  support.  Illinois  remains  to  be  mentioned.  Since  1899 
there  has  been  a  state  historical  societ)^  developing  in  part  out  of 
the  State  Historical  Library.  On  the  other  hand,  a  group  of  men 
at  the  state  university  has  edited  the  Collections  and  persuaded 
the  state  to  appropriate  for  a  historical  survey  in  1909  preparatory 


200  A.  H.  SHEARER 

to  the  State's  Centennial  of  1918.  The  result  has  been  that  there 
is  a  popular  society  with  its  Journal,  and  a  scientific  department 
which  has  produced  by  aid  of  graduate  students,  research  men, 
clerks  and  stenographers,  an  excellent  series  of  histories  and  docu- 
mentary publications. 

Now  the  chief  characteristics  of  these  central  states  and  their 
historical  societies  have  come  to  be  these, — historical  publications 
most  excellently  prepared,  and  of  great  value ;  on  the  other  hand, 
either  a  dwindling  membership  or  one  fairly  large  but  less  and  less 
responsible  and  consequently  less  and  less  responsive.  The  latter 
fact  worries  some  of  the  superintendents,  especially  as  in  the  last 
analysis,  it  is  not  so  much  state  pride  which  will  bring  forth  ap- 
propriations for  salaries  and  publications  as  the  demand  from  a 
group  of  interested  people  within  the  state. 

Let  us  add  one  more  statement  about  the  far  west.  Outside 
perhaps  of  the  Pioneer  Association  Society  of  Oregon  the  historical 
society  per  se  has  never  flourished.  The  publications  about  Cali- 
fornia for  instance  have  been  the  work  of  an  individual  like  H.  H. 
Bancroft,  or  in  recent  years,  of  the  State  University.  In  Wash- 
ington the  success  of  a  State  Historical  Society  has  been  due  to 
the  fostering  care  of  the  University  through  its  history  faculty, 
though  city  rivalry  has  caused  increased  interest  in  the  Washington 
State  Historical  Society  at  Tacoma. 

Now  in  all  these  societies,  east  and  west,  the  individual  initiative 
and  the  state  supported  society,  what  functions  do  we  find? 

First  perhaps  we  might  mention  the  interesting  of  people  in  the 
history  of  their  state  or  locality;  or  conversely,  giving  the  op- 
portunity to  people  interested  in  history  to  express  that  interest. 
In  the  east  there  is  a  spontaneous  gathering  locally  and  in  state 
organizations  for  the  sake  of  talking  history,  of  exchanging  ideas 
gathered  in  research,  of  visiting  historical  places,  of  marking  sites. 
This  takes  place  in  different  forms,  from  the  very  localized  group 
to  the  state  group,  some  interested  in  one  phase,  some  in  another. 
Does  the  fact  that  as  many  as  75  societies  died,  and  that  another 
75  can  be  said  to  have  only  a  normal  existence  so  far  as  this  func- 
tion goes,  mean  that  the  historical  spirit  is  decadent?  Have  the 
material  interests  crowded  it  out,  has  prosperity  been  too  much 
in  some  cases  (as  when  there  is  a  magnificent  building  or  a  swollen 
endowment),  or  has  indeed  the  cold  cruel  attitude  of  the  scientific 


STATE  HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES  201 

historian,  trained  to  a  nicety  in  everything  except  human  sympathy 
and  regard  for  enthusiasm,  laughed  it  to  scorn  so  successfully  that 
it  can  not  hold  up  its  head?  I  could  give  examples  of  each  of 
these.  I  know  of  one  state  where  the  Ph.  D's.  said  they  were 
watching  the  state  society  to  see  when  the  time  was  ripe  to  join 
and  swing  ib  into  the  proper  line.  They  watched  in  scorn  for  a 
dozen  years  and  then  necessity  drove  them  to  membership  in  time 
to  be  in  at  the  obsequies.  In  the  central  states  mention  has  already 
been  made  of  the  feeling  akin  to  despair  on  the  part  of  some  of  the 
superintendents  as  to  interesting  the  people  of  the  state  in  their 
state  society.  Which  is  best,  a  society  growing  up  as  the  result 
of  a  natural  desire  or  a  society  gathered  together  by  a  state  super- 
intendent working  downward  into  all  parts  of  the  state? 

Let  me  say  right  here  that  I  think  our  own  association  is  in 
a  rather  fortunate  position.  It  was  wholly  spontaneous,  both  in 
its  inception,  and  in  its  growth  to  include  the  whole  state,  yet  it 
has  always  been  in  close  touch  with  the  state  historian,  who  now 
as  a  civil  service  officer  selected  because  of  training  in  history  as  a 
head  of  a  department  of  archives  and  history  corresponds  to  simi- 
lar officials  under  different  names  in  Wisconsin,  Minnesota,  Michi- 
gan and  othere  states.  He  has  the  opportunity  of  suggesting 
membership  to  different  people  as  he  goes  over  the  state,  of  speak- 
ing of  the  association  as  well  as  of  his  department,  of  carrying  ideas 
from  one  to  another  in  the  intervals  between  state  meetings.  The 
voluntary  side  can  be  emphasized  but  the  central  directing  figure 
can  observe  and  care  for  it.  A  decent  sized  membership,  with 
regular  meetings,  interesting  discussions,  and  an  opportunity  to 
learn  history  by  visiting  places  where  it  was  made,  is  a  stimulating 
beginning.  Incidentally  the  necessity  in  some  states  of  meeting 
always  in  the  same  place  may  have  advantages  but  also  has  its 
disadvantages. 

Secondly,  the  function  of  a  state  historical  society  is  to  correlate 
the  work  of  local  historical  societies.  In  some  states  the  state 
society  has  to  a  certain  extent  destroyed  interest  in  some  local 
societies.  In  Wisconsin  there  are  a  dozen  local  societies,  most  of 
them  not  spontaneous  but  organized  by  the  state  society.  I  know 
of  one  society  which  never  meets.  It  used  to  get  enough  mem- 
bers together  to  reelect  officers  but  latterly  the  officers  have  held 
over.     All  these  local  societies  are  affiliated  with  the  state  societ,. 


202  A.  H.  SHEARER 

whatever  that  may  mean.  In  other  states,  even  where  the  govern- 
ment supports  a  historian,  there  have  never  been  local  societies  at 
all.  In  Michigan  the  secretary  of  the  commission  federated  the 
local  societies  and  was  accomplishing  something  when  the  war 
broke  out.  In  Massachusetts  there  is  no  real  state  society  and 
the  Bay  State  Federation  attempted  to  fill  the  gap.  In  Pennsyl- 
vania the  Society  in  Philadelphia  is  not  really  a  state  society  and 
the  Federation  of  Historical  Societies,  due  mainly  to  two  or  three 
ofllcers  and  some  others  of  vision,  has  performed  a  real  office  in 
bringing  together  those  interested,  and  conversely  in  stimulating 
interest  in  the  local  societies. 

Again,  to  speak  of  ourselves,  we  find  ourselves  the  state  associ- 
ation of  New  York,  originally  perhaps  organized  only  as  another 
local  organization,  but  now  really  a  state  organization.  It  was 
never  intended,  I  suppose,  that  this  association  should  have  re- 
lations with  the  local  organizations,  of  which  there  are  some  90 
or  100  in  the  state,  but  it  seems  to  me  as  I  look  over  the  member- 
ship and  make  a  substantial  guess,  that  at  least  90%  of  the  As- 
sociation's members  belong  to  local  societies,  and  in  many  cases 
to  more  than  one.  Without  consciously  intending  to  be  so,  it  is 
becoming  a  uniting  bond  of  the  other  societies,  and  this  without 
superseding  them.  Perhaps  this  fact  might  be  taken  into  con- 
sideration in  the  programs,  in  the  meeting  places,  possibly  even  in 
the  officers  chosen,  certainly  in  suggestions  for  membership.  If 
we  could  reach  the  point  where  we  could  first  suggest,  then  urge 
upon  local  societies  the  desirability,  then  the  necessity  of  being 
represented  at  the  state  meeting,  and  then  have  something  that 
each  would  carry  back  to  his  local  society,  or  to  the  sectional 
federation  as  our  state  historian  suggested  in  1917,  we  would  have 
a  unity  of  action  and  feeling  such  as  west  of  us  they  do  have  be- 
cause they  have  not  the  local  societies  to  build  upon,  and  such  as 
most  of  the  east  does  not  have  because  they  have  not  found  a  suc- 
cessful bond.  We  will  be  as  much  better  off  than  Pennsylvania 
and  Massachusetts  where  they  have  only  federations  as  the  people 
of  the  United  States  imder  the  Constitution  were  when  under 
the  Confederation,  because  we  act  directly  on  the  individual  with- 
out destroying  his  local  allegiance. 

A  third  function  is  that  of  preservation  of  records.  To  a  certain 
extent  it  means  a  permanent  official  and  staft'  to  attend  to  this 


STATE  HISTORICAL  SOCIETIES  203 

properly,  but  the  local  society  or  person  interested  can  help  vastly 
by  discovering  and  informing  and  where  possible  by  depositing 
material  at  the  central  headquarters.  This  applies  also  to  museum 
objects.  Legislation  is  sometimes  necessary  to  properly  carry  out 
this  function,  as  in  the  case  of  allowing  or  even  compelling  the 
deposit  of  local  records  in  a  central  place.  The  state  officials  of 
the  Middle  West  have  progressed  very  far  in  this  respect;  they 
have  blazed  the  way  and  are  approaching  the  ideal.  In  New  York 
State  we  are  making  progress,  and  the  state  association  can  assist 
by  reporting  information,  by  advice,  by  supporting  the  state 
department,  by  telling  the  legislature  the  real  facts. 

And  fourthly,  a  very  important  function  is  that  of  publication. 
When  we  are  all  long  buried,  posterity  will  search  our  publications 
and  our  reputation  will  depend  on  them.  There  has  been  a  vast 
amount  of  good  material  published  by  the  historical  societies. 
Before  ever  a  State  Historian  was  heard  of,  the  Massachusetts 
Historical  Society  was  putting  out  its  fine  publications.  Individ- 
uals gave  funds  for  publications  such  as  the  Peabody  fund  of  the 
Maryland  Historical  Society  and  the  J.  D.  Jones  fund  of  the  New 
York  Historical  Society.  The  Pennsylvania  Society  published 
Memoirs  and  then  established  its  valuable  magazine.  But  the 
West  was  not  behind,  even  in  the  days  when  the  voluntarily  band- 
ed together  groups  were  operating,  before  the  state  took  a  hand. 
The  Wisconsin  Historical  Collections  date  from  1855,  the  Minne- 
sota Historical  Collections  from  1856,  and  the  Pioneer  and  His- 
torical Society  of  Michigan  publications  from  1877.  In  later  years 
under  Draper,  Thwaites,  and  Quaife  in  Wisconsin,  Buck  in  Minne- 
sota, Shambaugh  in  Iowa,  Alvord  in  Illinois,  Owen  in  Alabama, 
Rowland  in  Mississippi,  and  others,  the  publications  have  been 
remarkable  for  wisdom  in  selection,  for  exhaustiveness  of  research, 
for  care  in  editing,  and  in  general  for  their  form. 

What  are  the  general  characteristics  of  these  publications?  I 
think  there  are  three  in  particular.  First  are  the  Collections,  in 
which  docimients  are  printed  from  manuscripts  or  from  scarce 
examples.  These  are  always  of  value  to  people  interested  in 
history,  not  only  in  one  state  but  throughout  the  country,  indeed 
the  world,  and  upon  them  can  be  built  up  the  authoritative  his- 
tories of  the  future.  Secondly,  we  have  the  Proceedings  of  meetings, 
sometimes  merely  annual  reports.     These  have  unfortunately  been 


204  A.  H.  SHEARER 

the  veriest  trash  insomecases  and  have  borne  down  the  reputation 
of  what  otherwise  might  have  been  a  respectable  society.  Third, 
periodical  publications,  in  which  documents,  monograph  material, 
addresses,  news  notes,  editorials,  and  book  reviews  appear.  These 
vary  greatly,  but  for  excellent  publications  the  Pennsylvania 
Magazine  and  the  Minnesota  History  Bulletin  are  two  different 
types. 

If  I  might  refer  to  our  own  association  again,  in  reference  to 
these  different  publications,  I  suppose  it  never  will  be  as  it  has 
not  been,  our  function  to  publish  doctunents  as  collections.  Our 
situation  rather  is  that  we  have  a  state  department.  Excellent 
collections  have  already  been  published.  Perhaps  the  thing  for 
us  to  do  is  to  demand  of  the  legislature  that  more  be  published 
and  then  advise  the  department  what  is  wanted  first.  The  state 
historian  is  always  open  to  suggestions  but  perhaps  he  would  not 
want  anything  so  definite  as  an  advisory  committee  on  publications 
of  this  association.     We  might  try  it  and  see. 

As  to  proceedings,  here  I  am  afraid  the  association  does  not 
stand  as  high  as  it  should.  There  are  occasionally  valuable  con- 
tributions but  then  again  there  are  those  which  are  not.  As  to 
the  periodical, — the  New  York  State  Historical  Association's 
Quarterly  takes  high  rank  with  such  publications  of  the  country 
and  if  we  but  new  how  well  it  was  received,  we  would  demand  full 
support  of  it  from  the  association. 

In  writing  thus  about  state  historical  societies,  I  could  not  help 
thinking  of  otu*  own  association  with  its  possibilities  in  comparison 
with  others  over  the  country  and  have  ventiired  to  mention  them. 
And  might  I  add  that  in  trying  to  restrain  the  limits  of  my  paper 
I  have  omitted  much  anecdotal  material  which  clings  to  historical 
societies  as  to  individuals,  and  which  I  might  have  mentioned  en 
passant.  Doubtless  however  any  one  of  you  know  enough  of  these 
societies  to  supply  the  illustrations  appropriate  to  the  subject  and 
so  have  worked  with  me  in  developing  the  matter  as  it  has  been 
presented. 

A.  H.  Shearer 


CALEDONIA  IN  THE  NATION'S  WARS 

In  the  year  1805,  the  Rev.  Joseph  Avery^  preached  to  Caledonia's 
infant  church  and  administered  the  sacraments  to  its  people.  He 
made  a  number  of  missionary  tours  through  the  new  settlements 
of  Northern  Massachusetts  and  Middle  and  Western  New  York. 
Fearsome  and  lonesome  joiuneys  they  must  have  been  for  the 
sohtary  horseman,  grand  old  man  that  he  was,  through  miles  of 
unbroken  forests  with  the  scattered  households  few  and  far  be- 
tween. 

In  1799  he  assisted  at  the  organization  of  the  first  Congregational 
Church  at  West  Bloomfield;  he  preached  the  first  sermon  ever 
delivered  in  Vernon,  Oneida  County,  and  he  was  the  first  to  carry 
the  gospel  to  the  white  settlers  in  the  Niagara  Frontier.  Mr. 
Avery  labored  under  the  auspices  of  the  Berkshire  Missionary 
Society.  Its  proclamation  has  mingled  pathos  and  singleness  of 
purpose  worthy  a  coimty  which  is  credited  with  sending  out  the 
greatest  number  of  pioneers  of  any  New  England  community; 
pioneers  of  unequalled  worthiness,  many  of  whom  found  homes 
in  the  Valley  of  the  Genesee.     It  reads  in  part: 

"To  the  inhabitants  of  the  new  settlements  who  are  Destitute 
of  a  preached  gospel  and  the  stated  administration  of  its  ordi- 
nances. Brethren  and  Friends,  animiber  of  your  fellow  candi- 
dates for  eternity  consisting  of  ministers  and  others  in  the  Coun- 
ties of  Berkshire  and  Columbia  and  their  vicinities  have  been 
excited  from  a  view  of  your  destitute  situation  to  think,  on  ways 
and  means,  to  have  you  enjoy  with  them  the  inestimable  bles- 
sings of  the  gospel ;  as  the  only  means  of  accomplishing  this  de- 
sirable end  they  have  been  led  to  form  themselves  into  a  mis- 
sionary society  to  give  a  more  extensive  and  universal  spread 
to  the  gospel  of  the  Divine  Redeemer.  Brethren,  we  solemnly  dis- 
claim any  other  end  in  the  exertions  we  are  making  than  the  propa- 
gation of  the  gospel  and  the  spreading  of  the  knowledge  of  the 
true  God  among  you  and  the  salvation  of  otir  fellow  sinners." 

I  have  the  diary  Reverend  Mr.  Avery  kept  on  this  journey  of 
1805  from  which  I  quote: 


'See  the  Quarterly  Journal  for  October,  1921. 

205 


206  HARRIET  B.  DOW 

"Friday,  Oct.  18,  1805"  (He  was  on  his  homeward  way) — 
After  leaving  Ganson's  he  speaks  of  AlHn's  River: 

"Its  falls,  its  misterious  disappearance  and  reappearance  in  greater 
volume  further  on. "  And  he  also  visits  an  old  fort  in  the  woods ; 
he  continues:  "I  here  rode  6J^2  miles  to  keep  my  appointment 
at  the  Deep  Springs  called  Caledonia.  Met  with  the  elders  of 
the  church  and  the  members  in  their  way  of  preparation,  in  the 
Scotch  way  for  the  Communion.  Many  of  the  members  could 
not  speak  and  some  could  not  understand  English." 

"Sat.  Oct.  19— Preached  a  Sacramental  sermon  to  a  good 
audience  and  baptized  6  children." 

"Lord's  Day,  Oct.  20th — Preached  twice  and  administered 
communion  or  sacrament.  There  was  a  greater  collection  of 
people  than  I  had  seen  on  the  Purchase;  there  were  more  than 
50  communicants  and  many  came  6>2  miles  North  and  South. 
The  people  have  been  here  only  two  years  and  many  are  but 
one  from  Scotland." 

"Monday,  21 — Preached  a  sermon  at  11  according  to  their 
custom  after  communion.  The  donation  was  $4.25.  These 
Springs  are  good  water  and  the  most  of  the  time  carry  a  grist 
and  saw  mill.  I  put  up  at  Alexander  MacDune's,  Esq.  Two 
families  came  here  today  direct  from  Scotland  in  9  weeks  to 
this  place.     I  left  in  the  afternoon." 

He  visited  Rev.  Ezekiel  Jedediah  Chapman  at  Geneva  both 
going  and  coming.  On  the  16th  of  September  he  attended  a 
Presb}d;ery  meeting  there.  He  also  described  the  tumulous  in 
this  vicinity  out  of  which  a  tree  18  inches  in  diameter  had  grown 
and  in  which  human  bones  of  mammoth  proportions  had  been 
found.  This  had  been  noted  by  other  early  writers,  some  of  whom 
affirmed  the  bones  to  be  larger  than  any  ever  before  found  of  our 
race.     Mr.  Avery  called  it  "A  strange  monument." 

This  beautiful  valley  was  a  wilderness  inhabited  only  by  scattered 
aborigines  when  the  great  decisive  war  which  made  us  a  nation 
was  fought  and  won.  Yet  the  echoes  of  that  momentous  conflict 
pierced  even  these  wooded  hills  which  it  opened  up  to  the  world. 
The  soldiers  of  Sullivan's  ruthless  raid  saw  a  land  of  wondrous 
promise  whose  fertility  they  heralded  far  and  wide  and  at  the  dawn 
of  peace  many  men  who  before  had  come  here  for  rapine  returned 


CALENDONIA  IN  THE  NATION'S  WARS  207 

to  make  their  homes  where  once  the  smoking  camp  fires  of  the 
original  Americans  had  ascended.  Later  new  settlers  from  the 
land  of  the  heather  brought  here  their  household  goods  and  the 
descendants  of  the  men  who  had  fought  for  the  Solemn  League 
and  Covenant  joined  hands  with  the  men  of  Lexington  and  York- 
town  in  a  common  pact  for  civil  and  religious  freedom  and  for 
brotherly  love  in  the  strange  new  Land  of  Promise.  Scotsman  and 
Yankee  found  much  to  learn  from  each  other,  were  it  only  to  drive 
an  ox  team  and  plow  a  straight  furrow,  and  Cupid  did  not  forget 
to  play  his  part. 

Many  men  of  the  Revolution  await  the  last  reveille  within  the 
confines  of  the  Caledonia  of  that  day:  Rev.  Solomon  Brown, 
William  Bingham,  Israel  Merriman,  Samuel  Stanhope,  John  Joslin, 
Rufus  Hebbard,  Comfort  Smith,  Rawson  Harmon:  in  Scottsville, 
Reuben  Heath;  in  the  village  of  Caledonia:  Isaac  Butterfield, 
David  Fuller,  Enoch  Place,  John  Gibson,  John  Irons. 

The  blood  of  many  of  these  patriots  is  alive  in  Caledonia  today ; 
noting  a  few  among  these,  Theron  Brown,  one  of  its  members, 
hails  back  to  Solomon  Brown  and  Rufus  Hebbard;  the  Doctor, 
Peter  McPherson  to  the  Yankee,  Isaac  Butterfield.  Mrs.  Stella 
Place  Brown  has  left  a  most  enduring  monimient  here.  What  is 
now  Caledonia,  Wheatland  and  LeRoy  was  at  one  time  in  the 
one  town  of  Caledonia,  though  for  some  inexplicable  reason  Cale- 
donia was  for  a  time  called  Elon,  and  the  township  was  called 
Southampton.  In  1806  all  Southampton  was  by  vote  changed 
to  Caledonia.     In  1821  Wheatland  was  set  off. 

So  it  was  a  wide  territory  when  the  long  threatened  conflict 
of  1812  broke  out.  It  opened  with  a  cruel  menace;  the  British 
Colonel  Proctor  offered  the  Indians  a  premium  for  every  American 
scalp,  and  these  premiums  were  actually  paid.  War  was  declared 
June  18th,  1812.  On  August  15th  following,  the  British  General, 
Sir  Isaac  Brock,  sent  General  Hull,  the  spineless  commander  of 
Detroit,  a  demand  for  surrender  in  these  dastardly  words: 

"It  is  far  from  my  intention  to  join  in  a  war  of  extermination 

but  you  must  be  aware  that  the  numerous  bodies  of  Indians 

who  have  attached  themselves  to  my  troops  will  be  beyond  my 

control  the  moment  the  contest  commences." 
A  thinly  veiled  threat  of  awful  consequences  which  were  not  with- 
out their  intended  effect  upon  the  senile  commanding  general  as 


208  HARRIET  B.  DOW 

subsequent  events  proved.  Brock,  you  remember,  was  himself 
killed  at  the  Battle  of  Queenstown  in  the  following  October.  The 
British  have  raised  a  commanding  monimient  to  his  memory  on 
the  heights  above  Queenstown,  while  a  boulder  dedicated  by 
Edward  VII,  as  Prince  of  Wales,  marks  the  spot  where  he  fell. 

Small  wonder  terror  spread  thro'  the  scattered  settlements  along 
our  unprotected  border.  Even  these  stories  of  fresh  horror  were 
scarcely  needed  to  intimidate  the  helpless  people  to  many  of  whom 
the  awful  atrocities  of  England's  cruel  allies  in  '76  were  still 
fresh  in  memory. 

A  letter  in  my  possession  writen  by  Rev.  Solomon  Brown  on 
one  of  his  frequent  missionary  journeys  brings  to  us  the  condition 
of  these  poor  frightened  pioneers.  Writing  from  Malone,  New 
York,  under  date,  September  19,  1812,  he  says: 

"I  arrived  at  this  place  about  half  past  twelve  this  afternoon 
at  the  house  of  Brother  Chipman's  expecting  to  have  a  meeting 
but  the  Exemps  have  a  training  at  the  French  Mills  this  day 
and  the  men  were  mostly  from  home  and  the  women  are  interested 
and  taken  up  in  conversation  about  the  war  and  Indian  affairs 
and  whether  it  is  best  to  move  off  or  not ;  they  have  no  time  to 
waste  for  meetings  for  religious  occasions.  Sister  Chipman 
sent  around  to  her  neighbors  (as  Brother  Chipman  was  away 
from  home)  to  attend  at  their  home  but  there  was  only  one  woman 
who  came  on  the  call,  one  woman  who  came  on  a  visit  and  one  man 
accidental  who  had  not  heard  of  the  meeting.  We  took  up  the 
time  in  conference.  I  waited  till  Sunday  12  o'clock  for  Brother 
Hascall  who  then  came  up ;  we  set  out  immediately  after  dinner 
from  Judge  Newcomb's.  We  rode  to  Kinner  Newcomb's  in  Chaz- 
ey .  Brother  Hascall  preached  in  the  evening.  Thursday,  set  out 
to  ride  thro'  the  woods  Chattingay  but  this  was  one  of  the  most 
melancholy  and  affecting  scenes  I  have  passed  since  the  late 
war.  We  met  people  constantly- in  the  after  part  of  the  day 
moving  chiefly  from  the  Missena,  most  on  horse  back  with  their 
families  and  what  they  could  load  on;  others  who  had  but  one 
horse  on  which  were  the  women  and  children ;  the  man  on  foot 
with  a  child  in  his  arms,  fleeing  for  life  leaving  all  with  settled 
dejection  on  their  countenances  as  we  passed  by  them.  When 
we  came  to  Mr.  Pumroy's  which  was  about  sundown,  there  was 
a  large  number  of  persons  consisting  of  about  60  families  small 


CALENDONIA  IN  THE  NATION'S  WARS  209 

and  great.  Some  women  and  children  crying,  and  men  en- 
quiring 'What  news?'  with  sad  dejected  countenances.  Mr. 
Pimiroy  very  pohtely  invited  us  to  tarry  all  night  with  them  and 
would  be  glad  to  have  preaching  but  there  would  be  constantly 
coming  in,  as  they  expected  fifty  more  people  that  night  that 
were  on  their  way  in  the  woods  and  we  found  their  conjecture 
true  for  we  passed  on  till  8  o'clock  at  night,  we  met  some;  some 
with  carts  loaded  with  goods,  some  with  two  yoke  of  oxen,  some 
three,  some  one,  some  wagons,  some  sleds,  men,  women  and 
children  wading  thro'  the  mud  at  night.  Some  men  had  chil- 
dren in  their  arms,  and  even  some  women,  and  some  groaning 
under  their  burden.  We  asked  if  they  were  tired;  'Yes',  some 
would  say,  'Most  tired  to  death.  How  far  is  it  to  the  next 
tavern?'  This  question  became  so  frequent  that  Major  Skinner 
would  tell  as  soon  as  they  came  up:  'I  know  your  question; 
how  far  is  it  to  Pumroy's?'  So  he  kept  on  answering  them  till  we 
met  them  three  miles  distant  at  8  o'clock  at  night  in  a  howling 
wilderness  and  as  muddy  a  road  as  you  ever  passed  and  probably 
more  so,  passed  by  them  all  and  directly  after;  back  from  the 
road  in  a  thick  cedar  swamp  we  heard  the  most  doleful  crying 
as  of  a  person  in  the  most  excrutiating  agonies  of  death.  We 
stopped  our  horses  to  be  sure  we  were  not  mistaken;  we  heard  it 
a  number  of  times;  we  were  about  three  miles  from  any  house. 
We  rode  on  till  we  came  to  Roberts' ;  his  house  was  full  of  people 
moving.  I  cannot  fully  explain  all  this  to  you  till  I  get  more 
time  and  paper.  We  rode  on  however,  to  Chattengay  Comers, 
a  distance  of  about  15  miles  after  sundown." 

Although  written  to  his  wife  this  letter  is  addressed  to  Elder 
Solomon  Brown,  Brookfield,  Essex  Co.,  N.  Y.  As  I  often  hear 
people  from  the  happy  Adirondack  Camps  speak  of  Malone,  Chat- 
tengay and  Chazy,  I  think  of  the  heartbreaking  scenes  of  that 
lonely  ride  a  century  and  more  ago. 

The  hardy  Scots  of  this  vicinity  early  heard  the  call  to  arms. 
Nine  days  after  the  declaration  of  war  Capt.  Robert  McKay  en- 
listed his  company  of  31  men,  practically  every  one  from  the  land 
of  the  heather.  As  was  to  be  expected  these  men  under  their 
handsome  young  captain  (who  must  have  been  a  man  of  "parts") 
gave  a  good  account  of  themselves.     Their  officers  were:  Robert 


210  .    HARRIET  B.  DOW 

McKay,  Capt. ;  Thomas  Deever,  Lieut. ;  Simon  Armstrong,  John 
McKenzie,  Jonathan  D.  Faulkner,  Sergeants;  Donald  Frazier, 
Zachariah  Bedford,  John  Turner,  James  Anderson,  Corporals. 
The  following  year  Captain  McKay  was  promoted  to  the  Colonelcy, 
William  Duer  succeeding  him.  McKay  was  taken  prisoner  at 
Lundy's  Lane;  carried  to  Montreal  and  afterwards  exchanged. 
Captain  McKay's  Company  belonged  to  Colonel  Daniel  Davis's 
Regiment,  New  York  State  Militia.  Colonel  Davis  rose  rapidly 
to  the  rank  of  Brigadier  General.  He  was  killed  at  the  sortie  at 
Fort  Erie.     General  Porter  in  his  official  report  says: 

"Brigadier  General  Davis  although  a  militia  officer  of  little 
experience  conducted  on  this  occasion  with  all  the  coolness  and 
bravery  of  a  veteran  and  fell  while  advancing  on  the  enemy's 
entrenchment.  His  loss  as  a  citizen  as  well  as  a  soldier  will  be 
severely  felt  in  the  patriotic  County  of  Genesee."  P.  B.  Porter, 
Brigadier  General  commanding  volunteers  and  militia,  Sept. 
22nd.  1814. 

General  Davis's  grave  is  in  the  little  wayside  cemetery  on  the 
State  road  a  mile  or  so  east  of  LeRoy  village ;  a  cemetery  generally 
so  unkempt  as  to  reflect  little  credit  on  the  patriotic  County  of 
Genesee,  whose  people  should  be  very  proud  of  that  lonely  grave 
where  sleeps  the  brave  officer  who  gave  up  his  life  to  make  perma- 
nent our  freedom. 

Fourteen  veterans  of  1812  await  the  last  muster  in  your  cemetery. 
So  far  as  I  can  learn  only  one  of  these  was  on  the  roster  of 
Captain  McKay's  valiant  young  minute  men  of  June  29,  1812: 

Caledonia — 18 12-14 

Alexander  Anderson  Duncan  Cameron 

Orange  Dean  Daniel  Gustion 

Malcolm  McArthur  John  Malloch 

John  McNaughton  Peter  McNaughton 

Isaac  Self  ridge  Alexander  McVean 

Peter  McVean  John  Blue 

Malcolm  McMartin  Jacob  Purkey 

which  shows  how  widely  scattered  are  your  graves  and  how  contin- 
uous was  your  patriotism. 


CALEDONIA  IN  THE  NATION'S  WARS  211 

The  story  goes  that  in  those  perilous  days  three  young  Scotsmen 
of  York,  Alexander  Stewart,  Duncan  Mclntyre  and  Donald  G. 
Frazer  although  aliens  decided  it  was  their  duty  to  leave  their 
chopping  and  logging  and  enlist  at  the  recruiting  station  at  Batavia. 
Accordingly  one  morning  bright  and  early  they  sallied  forth  (after 
a  hearty  breakfast  of  fried  pork  and  boiled  potatoes)  coats  on  arm 
and  staffs  in  hand.  They  halted  at  Duncan  Grant's  whom  they 
belabored  well  for  lack  of  patriotism  in  refusing  to  join  them. 
Grant  was  obdurate,  believing  their  zeal  wouldn't  take  them  be- 
yond the  big  Springs,  and  it  didn't.  After  nightfall  Grant  hid 
himself  near  where  he  thought  they  would  take  their  homeward 
way  and  he  did  not  have  long  to  wait  before  he  heard  Mclntyre 
and  Frazer  trying  to  persuade  Stewart  to  modulate  his  voice,  the 
natural  strength  of  which  the  day  at  the  Springs  hadn't  modified, 
lest  Grant  hear  him,  but  in  vain.  They  were  surprised  on  their 
hasty  homeward  march  and  never  to  their  dying  day  were  they 
allowed  to  forget  their  valiant  services  in  the  War  of  1812.  All  of 
them  became  honored  and  successful  citizens  and  founded  influ- 
ential families.  One  of  those  young  blades,  alas,  when  a  helpless 
old  man  was  tortured  to  death  by  robbers  in  his  own  home. 

One  day  in  the  latter  part  of  August,  1814,  Elder  Solomon 
Brown  was  preaching  to  his  flock  in  a  log  school  house  on  the  site 
of  the  present  school  building  in  that  part  of  Caledonia  which  is 
now  Belcoda.  A  messenger  came  to  say  that  Fort  Erie  and  the 
Niagara  Frontier  were  in  danger.  The  minister,  a  veteran  of  the 
Revolution  and  a  man  of  action,  closed  his  sermon,  made  a  fervent 
prayer  and  said  that  further  services  would  be  held  that  afternoon 
in  the  green  at  Garbuttsville  with  everyone  present  who  was  willing 
to  go  to  the  defense  of  his  country.  Forty  young  men  responded 
to  the  call.  It  was  a  worthy  crowd  of  embattled  farmers  whose 
only  accoutrement  was  patriotic  fervor  and  the  ability  to  handle  a 
gun.  They  gathered  such  clothing,  shoes,  food  and  arms  as  they 
could  muster.  Mr.  Levi  Lacy  went  surety  for  their  necessities 
at  the  Garbutt  Store,  the  same  store  over  which  a  Garbutt  now, 
as  then,  presides.  Without  being  formed  into  a  company  they 
started  early  the  next  morning  on  foot  for  Buffalo.  Their  number 
was  by  this  time  augmented  to  seventy -five.  Nearly  the  entire  male 
adult  population  of  that  part  embraced  in  the  present  town  of 
Wheatland.     Arriving  at  Buffalo  on  September  1st,  they  were 


212  HARRIET  B.  DOW 

enrolled  and  accepted  in  the  service  of  the  United  States  and  put 
on  active  duty.     Their  officers  were: 

Captain — Levi  Lacy. 

Lieutenant — ^Ward  Smith 

Ensign — Timothy  Doty 

Sergeants — ^John  Garbutt,  Ephraim  Blackmer,  P.  W.  Cady,  Wil- 
liam Grey. 

Corporals — Reuben  Budd,  Thomas  Armstrong,  Ephraim  Lacy, 
Hull  Case,  Jonathan  Harris. 

Musicians — John  Harmon,  fifer;  Nathaniel  Cobb,  drummer. 

Guards — ^William  Cox,  Jirah  Blackmer,  Martin  Sage,  Theron 
Brown,  Reuben  Jaquitt. 

Privates — Nathan  Bassett,  Ambrose  Killan,  Alpha  Wheeler, 
Isaac  Grant,  Amasa  Johnson,  Hezekiah  Higby,  Abram  B.  T. 
Grant,  Reuben  Hiu-lbtirt,  John Kelsa,  Stephen  Peabody,  Daniel 
North,  William  Cox,  Daniel  Van  Antwerp,  Henry  Gilman, 
Joshua  Howell,  James  Lewis,  John  M.  Goodhue,  Robert 
Hurlburtson,  Wm.  P.  Pentland,  Bela  Armstrong,  Ezra  Car- 
penter, Timothy  Jackson,  Jonathan  Webb,  Asa  Jacquitt, 
Philander  Higby,  Caleb  Calkins,  Andrew  G.  Cone,  Joseph 
Shadock,  Aaron  Usher,  Ranson  Harmon,  Jr.,  Thomas  Shad- 
bolt,  Andrew  Gray,  Hugh  Leeds,  Ezra  Brinster,  John  Johnson 
Harvey  Guthrie,  Martin  Sage,  Phillip  Garbutt,  William 
Johnson,  William  Darling,  James  Jones,  Ezra  T.  Cone, 
Jonathan  Babcock,  William  Stedman,  Thubal  Lamb,  Thomas 
E.  Fletcher,  Abram  Smith,  William  Garbutt,  Daniel  Grant, 
Benjamin  Warren  Hetzler,  James  Peires,  Charles  Killam, 
George  Hetzler,  Harley  Hugh  Sage,  Stephen  G.  Peabody, 
George  F.  Hetzler. 

Something  over  three  weeks  later  came  the  Sergeant's  laconic 
report : 

"Fort  Erie,  Sept.  21,  1814 
Left  the  Fort  having  conquered  the  British. 

John  Garbutt, 

Sergeant  Commander." 

It  was  this  same  sergeant,  John  Garbutt,  who  walked  to  Canan- 
daigua  in  1805  and  carried  home  on  his  back  the  books  forming 
the  nucleus  of  the  Wheatland  library.     This  was  not  only  the 


CALEDONIA  IN  THE  NATION'S  WARS  213 

first  library  in  Caledonia,  but  the   first  library    in  all    Western 
New  York. 

In  the  Fort  Erie  engagement  William  Garbutt  and  Stephen 
Guy  Peabody  were  wounded.  The  latter  and  one  other  were 
taken  prisoners  and  carried  to  Montreal  and  released  after  six 
months.  The  following  letter  written  to  Theron  Brown  during 
this  campaign  is  an  interesting  mixture  of  personal  interest  and 
inspiring  patriotism : 

"Caledonia,  Sept.  10,  1814. 
Dear  Theron: — 

We  send  you  by  Esquire  Blackmur  our  best  wishes,  a  pair  of 
pantaloons,  ^  bu.  of  onions. 

The  family  well  and  wish  you  to  conduct  yourself  like  a  good 
soldier,  quit  yourself  like  a  man  and  if  you  die,  die  valiantly, 
trusting  in  the  mercy  of  God;  the  cause  is  good. 

You  have  our  prayers  for  our  afflicted  coimtry  and  the  shield 
of  Jehovah  for  you  and  our  Western  Army  in  the  present  im- 
mergency. 

Mrs.  Grant  has  sent  Mr.  D.  Grant  a  pair  of  pantaloons,  and 
Mrs.  Grant  is  well  and  family. 

Encourage  the  soldiers  to  do  something  worthy  the  cause  they  are 
contending  for,  and  retrieve  the  character  of  the  Buffalo  Militia. 
In  the  greatest  haste, 

Your  affectionate  father, 

Solomon  Brown. 
Mr.  Jackqueth's  people  are  all  well  and  in  good  spirits." 

This  letter  is  addressed : 

"Mr.  Theron  Brown,  Soldier, 
Capt.  Lacy's  Com., 
Col.  Crosby's  R., 
Brigadier  G.  Davisis  Brig." 

Sixteen  of  these  men  are  in  the  cemetery  at  Belcoda  along  with 

eight  Revolutionary  and  two  Civil  War  Soldiers. 

War  of  1776 
Solomon  Brown  John  Josyln 

William  Bingham  Rufus  Hebbard 

Israel  Merriman  Comfort  Smith 

Samuel  Stanhope  John  Toms 


214  HARRIET  B.  DOW 

1812 

Calvin  Armstrong  Ranson  Harmon 

Ira  Armstrong  Jonathan  Harris 

Jirah  Blaclcmer  Hezakiah  Hebbard 

Ephraim  Blaclcmer  Wm.  Palmer 

Theron  Brown  Shepard  Palmer 

Andrew  Cone  William  Shirts 

Abijah  Collins  Martin  Sage 

Henry  Oilman  John  Welch 

Ashbel  A.  Hosmer,  Buried  at  Clifton 

1861 
George  Cate  John  Hays 

The  Big  Springs  seems  long  a  halting  place,  but  the  Indian  seldom 
made  his  home  there.  To  its  haunted  woods  he  carried  criminals 
and  captives  for  torture.  So  frequent  were  his  journey ings 
through,  that  scarcely  was  one  camp  fire  black  before  another  was 
lighted.  Here  the  great  Brant  and  many  other  Senecas,  as  well 
as  Butler's  ruthless  Rangers,  halted  when  fleeing  before  the  re- 
lentless Sullivan.  The  little  town  often  suffered  from  the  lawless- 
ness of  returning  soldiers  who  did  not  hesitate  even  to  walk  into 
Mr.  Cameron's  store  and  help  themselves  to  anything  they  liked 
without  the  formality  of  recompense. 

One  day  some  five  hundred  sailors  drafted  for  Perry's  fleet  passed 
through  here.  They  made  an  imposing  military  caravan  in  their 
great  wagons.  They  stopped  here  for  their  midday  meal.  Build- 
ing a  fire  they  happened  to  espy  Mr.  Robert  McKay's  inviting 
potato  field  near  by  and  they  started  in  to  help  themselves  against 
the  owner's  vigorous  protest.  Some  of  the  latter's  armed  friends 
coming  to  his  assistance  a  fight  was  imminent  which  would  have 
proved  an  unequal  contest  against  the  500  husky  sailor  lads  when 
their  officers  who  were  enjoying  themselves  at  Mr,  Cameron's 
hostelry  were  hastily  stimmoned  and  they  soon  quelled  the  dis- 
turbance. Spending  that  night  at  Batavia  the  sailors  reached 
Buffalo  the  next  day  and  put  aboard  the  fleet.  The  day  following 
they  took  prizes  near  Ft.  Erie  valued  at  $200,000.  They  could 
haul  down  the  Union  Jack  but  they  couldn't  have  Mr.  McKay's 
potatoes. 


CALEDONIA  IN  THE  NATION'S  WARS  215 

Wounded  and  dead  Americans  were  carried  through  here.  One 
man  describes,  or  tries  to,  the  impression  made  upon  him  when 
looking  into  a  sleigh  he  saw  the  frozen  body  of  Major  Barton  of 
Bloomfield  and  another  soldier  just  as  they  were  picked  up  from 
the  battle  field.  British  prisoners  were  taken  through  here  and 
sometimes  the  Scotchmen  escaped,  notably  Thomas  Faulkner, 
who,  when  about  three  miles  east  of  the  village,  slipped  from  his 
convoy  and  hid  in  the  bushes.  He  was  kept  hidden  and  cared  for 
by  the  people  till  the  close  of  the  war  when  he  cast  in  his  lot  with 
America  and  became  one  of  our  most  respected  citizens. 

One  day  during  these  times  three  soldiers  stopped  for  a  time  in 
Caledonia.  Before  passing  on  eastward  and  probably  homeward; 
they  seemed  somewhat  under  the  influence  of  liquor.  A  short 
time  afterward  some  three  miles  distant  to  the  east  the  dead  body 
of  one  of  them  was  found,  shot  through  the  head.  No  effort  was 
made  to  find  the  murderers.  A  hole  was  dug  where  he  lay  and 
without  the  benefit  of  clergy  or  winding  sheet  the  poor  broken 
body  was  consigned  to  the  earth.  There  seemed  no  care  that  he 
was  a  htiman  being  and  no  thought  that  a  man  enlisted  for  the 
defense  of  his  country  deserved  at  least  a  Christian  biuial,  if  not  a 
soldier's  obsequies.  Afterwards,  a  strange  plant  grew  from  this 
lonely  wayside  grave;  a  perennial  unknown  to  this  region.  It 
grew  and  blossomed  year  after  year;  flower  and  soldier  alike 
strangers  in  a  strange  land.  Then  a  vandal  hand  uprooted  the 
mysterious  plant,  which  came  no  one  knows  whence,  uprooted  it 
root  and  branch  and  today  no  one  knows  where  lay  the  "soldier 
of  his  country  mustered  out." 

This  story  touched  the  heart  of  the  poet  McNaughton  who 
frequently  in  his  youth  passed  this  nameless  grave,  and  he  has 
made  it  the  theme  for  one  of  his  sweetest  and  most  pathetic  poems. 

THE  FADED  COAT  OF  BLUE 

My  brave  lad  he  sleeps  in  his  faded  coat  of  blue, 
In  a  lonely  grave  unknown  by  the  heart  that  beats  so  true. 
He  sank  faint,  and  hungry  among  the  famished  brave, 
And  they  laid  him  sad  and  lonely,  within  his  nameless  grave. 

He  cried:  "Give  me  water  and  just  a  little  crumb, 

And  my  mother  she  will  bless  you  through  all  the  years  to  come. 


216  HARRIET  B.  DOW 

And  tell  my  sweet  sister,  so  gentle,  good  and  true. 

That  I'll  meet  her  up  in  Heaven,  in  my  faded  coat  of  blue." 

He  said — "My  dear  comrades,  you  cannot  take  me  home, 
But  you'll  mark  my  grave  for  mother,  she'll  find  me  if  she'll  come; 
I  fear  she'll  not  know  me,  among  the  good  and  true. 
When  I  meet  her  up  in  Heaven,  in  my  faded  coat  of  blue." 

Long,  long  years  have  vanished,  and  though  he  comes  no  more, 
Yet  my  heart  will  startling  beat  with  each  footfall  at  my  door; 
I  gaze  o'er  the  hill  where  he  waved  a  last  adieu. 
But  no  gallant  lad  I  see,  in  his  faded  coat  of  blue. 

No  sweet  voice  was  there,  breathing  soft  a  mother's  prayer, 
But  there's  One  who  takes  the  brave  and  the  true  in  tender  care- 
No  stone  marks  the  sod  o'er  my  lad  so  brave  and  true. 
In  his  lonely  grave  he  sleeps,  in  his  faded  coat  of  blue. 

Chorus 
No  more  the  bugle  calls  the  weary  one; 
Rest;  noble  spirit!  in  thy  grave  unknown; 
I'll  find  you,  and  know  you,  among  the  good  and  true. 
When  a  robe  of  white  is  given  for  the  faded  coat  of  blue. 

These  words  "The  faded  coat  of  blue"  have  been  enshrined  in 
our  language. 

Our  militia  dates  back  to  the  train  bands  of  England  whose 
origin  is  so  remote  as  to  be  almost  legendary.  Milton  said  of 
them,  "They  are  the  truest  and  most  proper  strength  of  a  free 
nation."  It  came  naturally  to  our  shores  with  our  English  found- 
ers as  a  part  of  the  Church  Militant.  It  protected  the  early  settlers 
against  organized  Indian  forays  of  such  chiefs  as  King  Philip. 
In  1774  was  found  the  formation  of  regular  miHtia  companies 
in  all  the  colonies,  and  it  was  the  miHtia  whether  organized  as 
Continentals  or  volunteers,  or  acting  on  its  own  organization  that 
brought  the  Revolutionary  War  and  largely  the  War  of  1812  to  a 
successful  finish.  On  attaining  ovu-  independence  our  forefathers 
recognized  it  as  the  People's  Army,  delegating  Congress  to  provide 
for  the  arming  and  developing  of  the  militia  and  governing  such 
part  of  it  as  may  be  employed  in  the  service  of  the  United  States. 
To  the  respective  states  was  left  the  appointment  of  the  officers 


CALEDONIA   IN  THE  NATION'S  WARS  217 

and  the  authority  for  training  the  militia  according  to  the  discipline 
prescribed  by  Congress.  The  President  was  to  act  as  Commander- 
in-Chief  of  the  same  when  called  into  actual  service  of  the  United 
States. 

In  1776  the  State  of  New  York  passed  a  law  providing  a  very 
good  organization  for  its  militia  based  upon  the  theory  that  every 
ablebodied  male  citizen  between  the  ages  of  18  and  45  was  loyally 
bound  to  be  prepared  at  all  times  to  defend  the  public  weal  and  it 
required  him  to  be  enrolled  by  the  Captain  of  his  respective  com- 
pany district.  Within  three  months  after  such  enrollment  he  was 
to  provide  himself  with  a  musket  and  bayonet,  and  a  pouch  and 
25  cartridges,  blanket,  knapsack,  etc.  Brigades,  regiments, 
companies  of  artillery  and  infantry  were  provided  for  as  well*~as 
common  uniform  for  officers  and  men  which  was  to  be  provided 
at  individual  expense. 

Each  took  his  military  duty  as  the  solemn  matter  it  was.  One 
week  at  least  each  year  was  given  to  general  training  which,  with 
its  drill,  its  lesson  of  obedience  and  team  work  and  spirit  of  pre- 
paredness, was  a  splendid  education,  not  in  militarism  but  in 
genuine  self  protection. 

The  77th  Regiment  New  York  Militia  and  the  Grenadiers  of  a 
later  day  were  Caledonia's  own,  among  the  officers  of  which  were 
49  of  her  best  known  citizens: 

Grenadiers 

Colon  Orr  Ensign 

James  Hill,  Jr.  Capt. 

Daniel  McNaughton  Lieut. 

James  0.  Gibbons  Capt. 

Harley  Glass  Lieut. 

John  Storm  Ensign 

Alex.  Gordon  Major  Lieut.  Col. 

John  Miller  Quartermaster 

John  Savage  Graham  vSurgeon 

Henry  L.  Weatherwax  Ensign 

Daniel  C.  McNaughton  Capt. 

Joseph  Campbell  Lieut. 

John  McKay,  Jr.  Lieut.  Capt. 

Peter  Forbes  Adjutant  Paymaster 

Wm.  McKay  Lieut.  Col. 


218 


HARRIET  B.  DOW 


Archibald  H.  McLean 

Lieut.  Col.  Adjutant 

Graham  N.  Fitch 

Surgeon 

77th  Regiment 

Daniel  A.  Peck 

Lieut. 

Hugh  D.  McColl 

Lieut. 

James  Hawley 

Ensign 

Nelson  Arrowsmith 

Ensign 

Archibald  Ferguson 

Ensign 

Jonathan  Johnson 

Ensign 

Wm.  Forbes,  Jr. 

Ensign 

Wm.  A.  Burlingame 

Ensign 

Elijah  Humphrey 

Quartermaster 

A.  McClenen 

Adjt. 

Chester  Rice 

Ensign 

Angus  Cameron 

Paymaster.  Major 

Alex  Cameron 

Capt. 

Daniel  Campbell 

Lieut. 

John  W.  Walker 

Ensign 

James  Shaw 

Capt. 

James  Hill,  Jr. 

Lieut.  Capt. 

Archibald  Mclntyre 

Ensign 

Wm.  McKay 

Lieut.  Col. 

Angus  Cameron 

Major.  Lieut-Col. 

Alex  Cameron 

Quartermaster.  Capt 

Alex  Gordon 

Ensign.  Capt. 

John  Simpson 

Ensign 

Thompson  L.  Daniels 

Ensign.  Lieut. 

James  Shaw 

Major 

Cingus  McKenzie 

Ensign 

Abial  Robertson 

Ensign.  Capt. 

James  0.  Bibbins 

Capt. 

James  Van  Fleet 

Capt. 

Peter  Ryan 

Capt. 

Alex.  McFarlan 

Capt. 

Wm.  Monteith 

Lieut. 

Practically  every  name  betokened  the  Gaul.  We  find  the  re- 
doubtable Robert  McKay  as  Lieut.  Colonel  of  the  74th  Regiment; 
while  Theron  Brown  was  at  one  time  Lieut.  Colonel  of  the  77th. 


CALEDONIA  IN  THE  NATION'S  WARS  219 

Later  Colonel  Brown  became  Brigadier  General  of  the  46th 
Brigade  New  York  Infantry,  which  consisted  chiefly  of  Rochester 
and  Monroe  County  men,  their  general  training  being  largely 
in  Rochester,  Chili  and  Wheatland.  Later  Robert  McKay 
was  Colonel  of  the  77th.,  though  when  it  marched  and  had  a  sham 
battle  in  Caledonia,  Hugh  McMillan  was  in  command.  The  first 
training  west  of  the  Genesee  River  was  near  the  village  of  LeRoy. 
In  Caledonia,  Elder  Uriah  Griswold  and  Timothy  Colton's  farms 
afforded  the  finest  parade  groimd  for  the  77th  Regiment.  That 
was  near  the  Tuscarora  line,  the  present  boundary  between  Lei- 
cester and  Caledonia.  For  fifteen  or  twenty  years  at  least  these 
drills  and  grand  reviews  continued.  In  the  Militia  as  in  the  secret 
training  in  their  ancestral  heath  the  men  of  Caledonia  were  never 
found  wanting.  The  call  of  the  Republic  was  to  them  the  blast 
of  Roderick  Dhu's  bugle  horn. 

What  need  now  to  speak  of  '61  ?  The  names  of  those  who  paid 
the  supreme  sacrifice  in  that  fratricidal  strife  are  graven  on  your 
hearts  as  well  as  on  the  enduring  marble.  Nine  gold  stars  are 
there  in  your  cemetery,  everyone  marking  a  Scotman's  grave; 
soldiers  of  the  Union  mustered  out.  Of  the  twenty-five  members 
of  your  honored  McNaughton  Post,  taps  have  sounded  for  all  save 
three.  In  your  village  one  of  Roosevelt's  Rough  Riders  bearing  a 
Highland  name  answered  his  last  Assembly  call,  Carroll  McVean. 

1 86 1-6 j,  Died 
Donald  Armstrong  William  Moore 

John  D.  McNaughton  James  Walker 

Frederick  Gibson  John  M.  Campbell 

William  McNaughton  Daniel  Donahue 

Archibald  Walker 

McNaughton  Post  Org.  i888 

Robert  M.  Place  Philip  Krautwaurst 

Geo.  W.  Moore  Peter  Campbell 

P.  W.  McNaughton  William  Ball 

Robt.  W.  Scott  Sylvester  P.  Clark 

Duncan  D.  Cameron  Thos.  Sheehan 

John  Weigart  William  Tygart 

Peter  Gallagher  Edward  Mclnroe 

Peter  Goodrich  Chas.  Spring 


220  HARRIET  B.  DOW 

John  Monroe  Geo.  Woodruff 

Wilson  Carruthers  — ■ 

Samuel  Carruthers  John  Monroe 

Frank  Banks  Thos.  Sheehan  and 

John  McEwen  William  Ball 

are  still  living. 

What  need  indeed  to  speak  of  3^our  Roll  of  Honor  in  Khaki.  God 
bless  it  with  its  precious  Star  of  Gold.  While  every  man  of  Scottish 
birth  lives  as  he  should  in  the  land  of  crags  and  heather,  such  a 
thing  as  a  hyphenated  Scotchman  has  never  been  known. 

Well  indeed  have  the  men  of  the  heather  fought  America's 
battles  here  and  over  seas.  From  the  Black  Watch  at  Ticonderoga 
all  along  the  line  to  the  great  Chieftan  who  gathered  the  remnants 
of  rebellion  in  his  hand  and  with  a  Scotch  grip  spelled  Antietam, 
every  American  from  Scotland  has  been  true  blue,  a  fair  foe  but 
a  terrific  fighter  as  the  Hun  learned  on  Flanders  Field  when  with 
more  truth  than  refinement  he  dubbed  the  soldiers  of  kilt  and  tar- 
tan as  "Ladies  from  Hell."  Of  everyone  who  fell  in  all  these  years 
of  our  history^  it  may  truly  be  said  that  he  died  "With  his  back  to 
the  field  and  his  feet  to  the  foe." 

Harriet  B.  Dow 


SOME  EARLY  DUTCH  MANUSCRIPTS 

LETTERS  TO  ADRIAEN  GERRITSEN  PAPENDORP 

Among  the  Dutch  papers  in  the  Albany  Institute  and  Historical 
and  Art  Society  there  are  several  letters  addressed  to  Adriaen 
Gerritsen  Papendorp  and  his  widow,  which  throw  an  interesting 
light  on  the  business  relations  between  the  Dutch  inhabitants  of 
Albany  and  their  relatives  and  friends  in  Holland,  shortly  after 
the  second  occupation  by  the  British  of  the  province  of  New 
Netherland. 

Adriaen  Gerritsen  Papendorp,  or  van  Papendorp,  as  he  is  some- 
times called,  was  an  early  trader  at  Beverwyck.  He  succeeded 
his  brother-in-law,  Dirck  Jansen  Croon,  as  extraordinary  magistrate 
of  the  court  of  Fort  Orange  and  the  village  of  Beverwyck  on  May 
1,  1657,  and  from  that  date  tintil  his  death,  in  1688,  repeatedly 
served  as  magistrate,  being  also  one  of  the  first  aldermen  of  the 
city  of  Albany  that  are  named  in  the  Dongan  charter  of  July  22, 
1686.  His  will,  dated  October  7,  1688,  which  was  proved  in  court 
by  the  witnesses  on  November  27  of  the  same  year,  is  recorded 
under  the  latter  date  in  the  city  records  and  is  printed  in  full  in 
the  Annals  of  Albany,  3:193-95.  In  this  will,  he  makes  his  wife, 
Jannetie  Croon,  his  heir  and  the  executrix  of  his  estate,  but  does 
not  mention  any  children.  A  power  of  attorney  which  is  among 
these  papers  shows  that  he  had  a  brother,  Jan  Gerritsen  Papendorp, 
who  died  at  Rotterdam  before  July  22,  1687. 

Two  of  the  letters,  dated  at  Amsterdam,  May  12,  1679,  and 
July  18,  1680,  are  signed  by  J.  H.  Sybingh,  who  may  have  been 
either  Jacob  Hendricksen  Sybingh,  or  Sybinck,  a  former  resident 
of  Beverwyck,  or  else  perhaps  his  brother  Jan  Hendricksen  Sybinck 
a  merchant  at  Amsterdam  to  whom  Adriaen  Jansen  van  Ilpendam, 
notary  public  at  Albany,  wrote  letters  in  1676  and  1679.  The 
first  of  these  letters  mentions  the  death,  in  the  earlier  part  of  1679, 
of  Papendorp's  brother-in-law,  Dirck  Jansen  Croon,  a  carpenter, 
who  became  a  magistrate  of  Beverwj^ck  on  August  24,  1655,  and 
returned  to  Holland  in  1663,  when  Papendorp  acted  as  administra- 
tor of  his  property.  Croon  was  a  well-to-do  resident  of  Beverwyck. 
His  house  on  Jonker,  now  State,  street,  which  was  sold  by  Papen- 

221 


222  EARLY  DUTCH  MANUSCRIPTS 

dorp  to  Jan  Cloet  on  November  12,  1664,  was  nicknamed  "de 
Spaerpot"  (the  Savingsbank),  and  his  household  effects,  which 
were  sold  at  auction  in  May  1664,  brought  a  total  of  427.05  guilders, 
an  unusually  large  amount  for  that  period.  The  second  letter  of 
J.  H.  Sybingh  refers  to  the  settlement  of  an  estate,  in  which  Pa- 
pendorp  was  interested.  This  was  probably  the  estate  of  Dirck 
Jansen  Croon.  The  letter  of  1679  also  refers  to  Adryan  Jansen 
Croon,  a  brother  of  Dirck,  who  was  likewise  a  former  resident  of 
Beverwyck,  and  who  returned  to  Holland  in  August  1660.  Accor- 
ding to  the  letter  of  Willem  Bancker  and  Hendrik  Sybingh,  he 
died  before  April  24,  1688. 

The  third  letter  is  signed  by  Gertruy  Rynders,  the  widow  of 
Barent  Rynders,  deceased.  The  latter  was  a  smith  by  trade. 
He  was  a  resident  of  Beverwyck  in  1657  and  owned  two  houses  on 
Rom  street,  now  Maiden  Lane,  which  he  sold  on  September  9, 
1678,  to  Jan  Nack  and  Gerrit  Lansing.  He  probably  returned  to 
Holland  shortly  after  the  last  mentioned  date  and  died  before 
June  3,  1682,  the  date  of  the  letter.  October  4,  1682,  Adriaen 
Gerritsen  Papendorp,  as  special  attorney  for  Barent  Rynderse, 
deceased,  sold  a  house  and  lot  on  Jonker  street  to  Jochim  Staets, 
Barent  Rynderse's  son-in-law.  The  letter  refers  to  Willem  Teller, 
junior,  a  surgeon,  who  married  at  New  York,  on  November  19, 
1686,  Rachel  Kiersted,  and  who  died  there  shortly  before  May  4, 
1711.  The  letter  also  mentions  Gerardus  Beekman,  to  whose 
little  son,  called  Adriaen,  Adriaen  Gerritsen  Papendorp  by  will 
left  his  "ring  with  y®  stone,  y^  gold  buttons  which  he  wore  in  his 
shirt,  y^  silver  tooth-picker,  and  greatest  silver  tommeler,"  and 
who,  therefore,  evidently  was  his  godchild. 

Joannes  van  de  Grift,  the  writer  of  the  fourth  letter,  was  prob- 
ably the  same  person  as  Joannes  Leendertsen  van  de  Grift,  or 
van  der  Grist,  who  in  1658  was  a  measurer  of  grain  and  lime 
at  New  Amsterdam. 

The  last  three  letters  deal  with  the  settlement  of  the  estate  of 
Adriaen  Jansen  Croon,  mentioned  above. 

An  interesting  item  in  the  letter  of  1679  is  the  reference  to  gim 
barrels  and  locks,  which  had  been  ordered  by  Papendorp.  This 
shows  that  guns  were  imported  without  the  stocks  and  explains 


EARLY  DUTCH  MANUSCRIPTS  223 

the  reason  for  the  existence  of  several  lademaeckers,  or  gunstock 
makers  among  the  inhabitants  of  Beverwyck. 

A.  J.  F.  VAN  Laer 

Translations 

J.  H.  Sybingh  to  Adriaen  Gerritsen  Papendorp 

Actum,  Amsterdam,  12  May  1679 
Mr  Adryan  Gerretsz 

After  greetings  and  best  wishes,  I  hope  that  you  and  your  wife 
are  well.  As  to  us,  we  thank  God  for  his  mercy.  As  it  has  pleased 
God  to  take  your  brother-in-law,  to  wit,  Dirck  Kroon,  out  of  this 
world,  Adryan  Jansz  has  asked  me  to  take  to  my  house  and  sell 
the  goods  which  you  had  sent  to  him  [Dirck  Kroon],  which  I  did 
and  of  the  proceeds  I  have  given  to  the  sister's  daughter  of  Mr 
Gerret  van  Sleghtenhorst,  in  the  presence  of  Mr  van  Ruyven,  2 
beavers.  I  sold  72  skins  at  6^  guilders  apiece.  They  were  the 
first  which  I  have  sold.  Among  them  there  were  24  which  are 
entered  as  half  skins  on  the  list.  Of  these  Adryan  Jansz  is  to  have 
7,  of  which  I  shall  give  him  the  money.  But  in  the  letter  it  was 
not  stated  whether  they  were  whole  skins  and  they  were  not  marked 
so  that  I  do  not  know  whether  I  shall  pay  him  7  whole  beavers  or 
not.  The  gun  barrels  and  locks  which  you  ordered  I  have  not 
dared  to  buy,  as  no  one  wants  to  take  them  with  him,  saying  that 
they  are  contraband.  I  wish  I  could  have  carried  out  your  orders. 
Adryan  Jansz  will  give  you  all  information  in  regard  to  Dirck 
Jansz.  Commending  you  with  your  wife  to  the  keeping  of  the 
Most  High,  I  remain. 

Your  friend  and  servant, 

J.  H.  Sybingh 

J.  H.  Sybingh  to  Adriaen  Gerritsen  Papendorp 

Actum,  Amsterdam,  18  July  1680 
Mr  Adrian  Gerretsz 

After  greetings  and  best  wishes,  I  hope  that  j^ou  and  your  wife 
are  well.  As  to  us,  we  thank  God  for  his  mercy.  My  last  letter 
was  sent  by  the  ship  St  Pitter,  to  which  I  refer  for  particulars. 
This  is  to  let  you  know  that  by  order  of  the  secretary  we  received 
for  you  fi.  3897-6-,  cotmting  in  the  costs  of  the  judgment  and  fees 


224  EARLY  DUTCH  MANUSCRIPTS 

paid  last  year  for  your  share,  as  well  as  the  interest  since  the 
judgment  was  obtained,  being  from  June  1679  to  November  1679. 
But  the  current  interest,  according  to  the  copy  of  the  letter  about 
it,  the  heirs  do  not  allow,  so  that  we  shall  have  to  sue  them  for  it 
before  the  court  if  they  not  willingly  resolve  to  pay  it.  We  have 
already  bought  a  Holland  and  Westvriesland  bond  of  fl.  2500  for 
you  at  2)4  guilders  above  par,  so  that  this  sum  is  already  earning 
interest  at  4%.  We  are  now  considering  whether  we  shall  invest 
the  remainder  also  in  a  bond;  we  wish  we  could.  At  any  rate, 
we  shall  do  our  best  and  shall  not  let  it  lie  idle.  What  will  be 
coming  to  you  for  your  part  of  the  lot,  is  as  yet  unknown,  for  we 
have  not  yet  got  so  far.  As  soon  as  everything  is  received,  we 
shall  see  how  we  can  best  invest  it.  As  to  what  is  further  in  my 
hands,  proceeding  from  the  box  of  peltries,  I  shall  await  orders 
what  to  do  with  it.  The  21  beavers  are  still  unsold,  so  that  you 
can  regulate  yourself  accordingly. 

I  commend  you  with  your  wife  to  the  keeping  of  the  Most  High 
and  remain, 

Your  friend  and  servant, 
J.  H.  Sybingh 
Addressed : 

The  Worthy,  Discreet  Mr  Adryaen  Gerretsz 
van  Papendorp 

at  Fort  Albany 

Geertruy  Rynders  to  Adriaen  Gerritsen  Papendorp 

Aderyaen  Gertsen  Papendorp 
Very  kind  and  beloved  friend: 

I  hope  that  you  and  your  wife  are  well.  As  for  myself,  I  am, 
thank  God,  reasonably  well,  but  I  have  four  children  very  sick 
with  smallpox.  But  I  am  quite  used  to  having  sickness  in  July, 
which,  as  long  as  I  have  been  living  in  Amsterdam,  has  never 
failed.  But  what  shall  we  do?  It  is  God's  will  and  we  must  rest 
content  with  that. 

Pursuant  to  your  order,  I  am  sending  you  by  the  ship  "Beaver," 
Jacob  Mauris,  master,  the  goods  listed  in  the  accompanying  invoice. 
Of  the  peltries,  I  still  have  in  hand  37  guilders,  13  stivers,  out  of 
which  I  must  pay  the  customs  and  expenses  in  England.  Of  all 
I  have  in  my  hands  that  belongs  to  you  I  have  heretofore  given  a 


EARLY  DUTCH  MANUSCRIPTS  225 

perfect  account  by  skipper  Jan  Gorter.  You  may  order  what  you 
like  to  have  done  with  it.  The  lace  which  is  mentioned  in  this 
invoice  you  will  please  demand  from  Willem  Teller,  the  younger, 
who  went  over  as  surgeon  on  Jan  Gorter's  ship.  I  hope  that  you 
will  not  take  it  ill  that  I  sent  the  lace  without  having  received 
definite  order;  kindly  let  me  know  whether  you  received  it. 
Among  the  peltries  sent  over  by  you  there  was  one  badger  skin 
which  is  not  worth  anything  here.  And  the  little  case  is  shipped 
to  Gerardes  Beeckman,  according  to  your  orders. 

Your  brother-in-law  Aderyaen  Kroon  is  still  in  good  health. 
Kindly  give  my  greetings  to  Teunes  Komeles  van  de  Poel  and 
his  wife  and  tell  him  that  I  wrote  all  particulars  by  skipper  Jan 
Gorter.  I  should  have  written  to  him  now,  but  can  not  bring  it 
about  with  all  these  sick  children  which  I  have  in  the  house.  As 
to  the  trade  here,  this  is,  thank  God,  again  fairly  good.  Com- 
mending you  herewith  to  the  Lord, 

Your  willing  servant  and  friend, 

Gertruy  Rynders,  widow  of 
Barent  Rynders,  deceased 
Actum,  in  Amsterdam 
June  3  Anno  1682 
Addressed : 

Mr  Adriaen  Gerritse  Papendorp 
Merchant  at  Albany 
per  the  ship  Beaver 
Capt.  Jacob  Mauritz 

Joannes  van  de  Grift  to  Adriaen  Gerritsen  Papendorp 

Mr  Adriaen  Gerretse  Papendorp 
Monsieur  and  worthy  friend,  salute! 

Your  letter  of  the  20th  of  August  was  duly  received,  from  which 
I  learned  that  you  are  well,  of  which  we  are  very  glad.  As  to  us, 
I  have  been  sick  a  long  time,  but  am  a  little  better  now.  My  wife 
and  son,  thank  God,  are  well.  I  received  from  the  hands  of 
Juffrouw  Siebingh  70  beavers  for  the  relatives  of  Tuenis  Willemse. 
Also,  from  Jacob  Teller,  a  small  leather  purse,  containing  3  pairs 
of  gold  buttons  and  53  stivers  in  Holland  money.  The  same 
evening  that  Teller  brought  me  the  piu-se,  it  was  lost  or  stolen 
from  my  house,  with  the  buttons,  money  and  all,  at  least,  I  do  not 


226  EARLY  DUTCH  MANUSCRIPTS 

know  what  has  become  of  it.  I  have  a  suspicion,  however,  who 
may  have  it,  as  three  of  my  good  acquaintances  were  here  to  have 
a  Httle  talk  and  I  showed  it  to  them.  I  then  put  them  [the  buttons] 
back  into  the  purse  and  laid  it  down  beside  me  and  have  not  seen 
them  since.  I  would  ask  you  therefore  to  write  me  some  time 
what  in  your  opinion  they  are  worth,  as  you  will  probably  know 
that,  in  order  that  the  relatives  of  Tuenis  Willemsen  may  also 
hear  what  they  were  worth.  I  shall  then  satisfy  them,  rather  than 
have  words  about  it.  I  also  understand  from  your  letter  that  you 
have  had  a  great  deal  of  trouble  with  them.  I  am  sorry  that  you  lost 
the  other  two  helpers,  and  I  thank  you  heartily  in  the  name  of  the 
relatives  for  your  trouble.  If  there  is  anything  here  in  which  I 
can  be  of  service  to  you,  please  command  me;  I  shall  take  care 
that  it  is  well  done.  For  the  present  I  know  of  nothing  else  but  to 
greet  you  and  your  wife  most  heartily  and  to  commend  you  to  the 
mercy  of  the  Lord,  that  He  may  give  us  all  what  will  redound  to 
our  salvation.     I  remain. 

Your  willing  servant, 

Joannes  van  de  Grift 
In  Amsterdam,  the  28th  of  March  1687 

If  you  have  received  the  remaining  15  beavers,  please  send  them 
at  the  first  opportunity  as  the  relatives  need  the  money. 

Addressed : 

Mr  Adriaen  Gerretsen  Papendorp 
Merchant  at  Albany 

Power  of  attorney  from  Adriaen  Gerritsen  Papendorp  to  Herman 

van  Winterswyk  and  Willem  Bancker 

Be  it  know^n  to  all  whom  it  may  concern  that  in  the  year  1687, 
the  22d  day  of  the  month  of  July,  being  in  the  third  year  of  the 
reign  of  James  the  Second  of  the  name,  by  the  grace  of  God,  King 
of  England,  Scotland,  France  and  Ireland,  Defender  of  the  Faith, 
lord  and  proprietor  of  the  colony  and  province  of  New  York  in 
America,  before  me,  Jan  Becker,  residing  at  N.  Albany,  notary 
public  admitted  by  his  Excellency  the  Right  Honorable  Thomas 
Dongan,  captain  general  under  his  Royal  Highness  aforesaid  over 
the  colony  and  province  of  New  York  and  residing  there,  appeared 
the  worth)^  JMr  Adriaen  Gertze  Papendorp,  residing  here  in  the 


EARLY  DUTCH  MANUSCRIPTS  227 

city  of  N.  Albany  in  America,  who  declared  that  he  constituted, 
as  he  does  hereby,  Mr  Herman  van  Winterswyk,  merchant,  re- 
siding at  Uytrecht,  and  Mr  Willem  Bancker,  merchant,  residing 
at  Amsterdam  in  Holland,  his  attorneys  and  empowered  them, 
jointly  or  severally,  to  receive,  demand  and  collect  all  that  the 
principal's  brother,  named  Jan  Gertze  Papendorp,  who  died  at 
Rotterdam,  left  the  principal  by  will,  bonds  of  which,  concerning 
the  estate,  are  in  the  hands  of  Mr  H.  Stalpaert  van  der  Wiele,  re- 
siding at  Uytrecht;  to  settle  the  estate,  give  a  discharge  for  the 
receipt  of  the  property,  and  out  of  it  to  pay  the  burial  expenses; 
but  in  case  of  refusal,  or  any  concealment  by  those  who  are 
required  to  give  information  or  make  payment,  to  constrain  them  to 
do  so  by  means  of  legal  proceedings  either  by  the  attorneys  or  those 
whom  they  shall  choose  to  employ  thereto,  to  and  inclusive  of  the 
final  execution ;  to  ask  for  revision,  to  appeal,  to  agree,  compromise, 
and  further  to  do  all  that  in  their  wisdom  they  may  judge  necessary, 
yes,  even  if  the  matter  required  further  and  more  specific  power 
than  is  expressed  herein,  which  the  principal  considers  to  be  in- 
serted and  included  herein ;  with  power  to  substitute  one  or  more 
others  in  their  places.  All  that  shall  be  done  herein  by  the  attorneys 
or  their  substitutes,  the  principal  promises  to  hold  and  to  cause 
to  be  held  of  the  same  effect  as  if  it  had  been  performed  by  himself, 
binding  himself  thereto  according  to  law,  provided  that  the  at- 
torneys shall  likewise  be  bound,  when  required,  to  render  a  proper 
accounting,  proof  and  statement  of  their  administration.  In 
witness  of  the  truth,  the  principal  has  signed  and  sealed  this, 
without  deceit,  on  the  date  above  written. 

Adriaen  Gerretse  Papendorp  [seal] 
(   Johannes  Wendel,  Alderman 
Signed  and  sealed         -s    L.  V.  Schayk,  Alderman 
in  the  presence  of        (.    Hendrick  Coyler,  Alderman 
In  my  presence:  J.  Becker,  Notary  Public 

Willem  Bancker  and  Hendrick  Sybingh  to  Adriaen  Gerritsen 

Papendorp 

Amsterdam,  April  30,  1688 
Mons^  Adriaen  Gerretz  Papendorp: 

In  our  last  letter  to  you  of  April  24th,  we  advised  you  that  on 
account  of  van  der  Karre  we  received  from  the  estate  of  Adriaen 


228  EARLY  DUTCH  MANUSCRIPTS 

Croon  the  sirni  of  fl.  58:2:2  and  according  to  agreement  for  the 
clothes  50  guilders.  Since  that  time  we  have  received  the  money 
which  for  the  behoof  of  the  said  van  der  Karre  had  been  deposited 
by  Croon  in  the  Orphan  Chamber  of  this  city,  the  principal  amount- 
ing to  fl.  240,  and  the  accrued  interest  to  21  guilders,  with  which 
we  shall  credit  your  account.  As  soon  as  the  interest  at  Gouda 
shall  have  been  received,  we  shall  render  an  account  of  everything. 
Wherewith  we  commend  you  with  yours  to  the  protection  of  God 
and  remain, 

Your  willing  servants  and  friends, 

WiLLEM  BaNCKER 

Hendrick  Sybingh 
Addressed : 

Monsieur  Adrien  Gerretz  Papendorp 
Merchant 

At  Albany 

Willem  Bancker  to  the  widow  of  Adriaen  Gerritsen  Papendorp 

Amsterdam,  the  25th  of  April  1690 
Juffrouw  Jannetie  van  Papendorp,  widow 
Dear  Friend: 

Since  my  last  letter  to  you,  the  people  who  claim  to  be  relatives 
of  3^our  late  husband  have  dared  to  attach  the  rent  of  the  house 
and  the  moneys  which  are  in  the  custody  of  myself  and  Ziebing. 
They  threaten  to  bring  an  action  against  us,  so  that  it  is  necessary 
to  send  by  the  first  opportunity  a  copy  of  the  will.  I  shall  then, 
I  think,  easily  be  able  to  get  rid  of  them.  They  seem  to  be  very 
hungry  wolves  and  very  rude  people.  They  have  already  once 
or  twice  treated  me  very  impolitely,  because  I  would  not  tell  them 
how  many  securities  belonging  to  you  there  are  here.  They  have 
engaged  a  rascal  of  a  lawyer,  who,  I  notice  is  to  serve  them  for  a 
portion  of  the  inheritance  and  it  seems  that  they  have  made  him 
believe  a  great  deal.  Of  news  there  is  not  much,  except  that  we 
are  involved  in  a  big  war^  and  that  last  year  not  much  progress 
was  made.  It  is  to  be  hoped  that  the  Lord  will  this  year  bless  the 
arms  more.     We  hope  that  skipper  Jacob  arrived  there  safely. 


^War  with  France,  which  ended  with  the  peace  treaty  of  Ryswick,  concluded 
in  1697. 


EARLY  DUTCH  MANUSCRIPTS  229 

With  hearty  greetings  to  yourself,  cousin  Abeel  and  the  friends, 

Your  wilHng  servant, 

WiLLEM  BaNCKER 

Addressed: 

To  Juffrouw  Jannetie  Croon 

Widow  of  Adriaen  Gerretz  Papendorp 
At  Albany 

Willem  Bancker  to  the  widow  of  Adriaen  Gerritsen  Papendorp 

In  Amsterdam,  the  27th  of  Julyl690 
Juffrouw  Jannetie  Croon 
Dear  Friend: 

Since  my  last  letters  to  you  by  way  of  Baston  and  by  de  Bever 
by  way  of  England,  in  case  these  should  not  reach  their  destination, 
these  are  to  let  you  know  that  people  who  claim  to  be  relatives  of 
your  late  husband  have  attached  the  goods  which  are  in  my  custody 
as  well  as  the  rent  of  the  house,  claiming  that  they  are  the  heirs. 
It  is  necessary  therefore  to  send  a  copy  of  the  will  to  some  one  who 
can  be  trusted.  Otherwise,  I  shall  have  much  trouble  with  it. 
Furthermore,  I  send  hearty  greetings  to  yourself  and  your  cousin 
Johannis  Abeel.  The  news,  my  honorable  father  will  communicate 
to  you. 

Your  willing  servant, 

Willem  Bancker 
This  goes  by  way  of  England. 
Addressed : 

To  Juffrouw  Jannetie  Croon 

Widow  of  Adriaen  Gerretz  Papendorp 
At  Albany 


From  City  Archives,  Amsterdam,  Holland 

deposition  of  cornelis  maesen  van  buren 

On  the  25th  of  February  anno  1636,  appeared  Com.  Martsa 
van  Buren,  aged  30  years,  and  declared  and  testified  for  the  truth, 
at  the  request  of  Ybel  Hendricx,  widow  of  Hans  Jorisz  Hontum, 
that  he,  the  deponent,  had  been  for  more  than  three  and  a  half 


230  EARLY  DUTCH  MANUSCRIPTS 

years  as  a  farm  hand  in  the  service  of  Mr  Rensselaer  in  New 
Netherland  and  came  home  in  November  last  past.  He  also  de- 
clared that  at  the  time  that  he,  the  deponent,  resided  there,  a  placard 
was  posted  by  the  aforesaid  Hontimi  by  order  of  the  lords  directors, 
providing  that  no  one  should  venture  to  trade  or  barter  with  the 
savages  (and  that  he,  the  deponent,  understood  that  Com,  van  der 
Vorst  on  that  account  conceived  a  hatred  or  animosity  against  the 
said  Hontvmi  and  swore  to  kill  him,  even  if  it  were  a  year  from 
that  date).^  He  also  declared  that  in  April  anno  1634,  eight  or 
ten  days  after  Easter,  the  exact  date  having  escaped  him,  the 
aforesaid  Comelis  van  der  Vorst  came  to  visit  the  said  Hontimi  at 
Fort  Orange  and  that  they  were  merry  together  and  crossed  the 
river  to  inspect  the  dwelling  and  the  farm  of  Rensselaer  where  he, 
the  deponent,  resided.  Being  there  also  merry  together,  the  afore- 
said [Hontum  and  van  der  Vorst]  had  some  words  together  in 
French  or  Italian,  at  any  rate  in  a  language  which  the  deponent 
did  not  understand,  van  der  Vorst  saying  among  other  things  that 
some  of  the  members  of  the  council  were  rascals.  Whereupon 
Hontum  asked  him  three  times  whether  he  said  that  the  members 
of  the  council  were  rascals  ?  To  which  the  aforesaid  Com.  van  der 
Vorst  replied:  "Yes,  some  of  the  councilors  have  done  by  me  like 
rascals."  The  aforesaid  Hontum  thereupon  struck  the  said  van 
der  Vorst  in  the  face,  so  that  his  nose  began  to  bleed,  whereupon 
van  der  Vorst  drew  his  sword  and  attacked  Hontum  and  stabbed 
him  in  the  breast  in  such  a  way  that  he  died  thereof  immediately. 
But  he,  the  deponent,  neither  heard  what  was  said,  nor  saw  the 
blow  or  the  stabbing,  having  stepped  for  a  moment  outside  the  door, 
but  learned  all  the  circumstances  from  the  other  people  who  were 
present  as  soon  as  the  deed  had  occurred ;  the  deponent  being  ready 
further  to  confirm  the  above  declaration,  if  necessary.  Done  in 
the  presence  of  Claes  Pietersz  and  Jan  Bitter,  datum  ut  supra. 
The  mark  of  Cornelis  Maesen 

Claes  x  Pietersz 
made  by  himself 
Jan  Bitter 

Protocol  of  Notary  Jan  Comelisz 
Hogheboom,  No.  843.     City  Archives 
Amsterdam,  Holland 


^The  words  in  parentheses  are  canceled  in  the  original  record. 


EARLY  DUTCH  MANUSCRIPTS  231 

Note 

Hans  Jorissen  Hontum,  or  Hunthum,  the  commisssary  of  Fort 
Orange,  who  according  to  the  above  deposition  was  stabbed  to 
death  in  April  1634,  belonged  to  a  well  known  family  of  fur  traders 
at  Amsterdam,  whose  founder,  Johan  Hunthum,  had  early  in  the 
17th  century  fled  to  that  city  from  Cologne  on  account  of  religious 
persecution.  He  was  a  man  of  bad  reputation,  of  whom  Kiliaen 
van  Rensselaer,  in  a  memorial  presented  by  him  on  November  25, 
1633,  to  the  Assembly  of  the  XIX  of  the  Dutch  West  India  Com- 
pany, wrote  as  follows:  "And  what  is  worst  of  all  and  most  to  be 
regretted,  instead  of  the  servants  of  the  Company  being  on  good 
terms  with  the  patroons  and  their  servants,  they  [meaning  the  di- 
rectors of  the  Amsterdam  Chamber  of  the  Company]  on  the  con- 
trary have  appointed  as  commis  at  Fort  Orange,  situated  in  his 
colony,  against  the  wishes  of  the  remonstrant,  a  person  who  has 
publicly  slandered  the  Company,  has  helped  those  sailing  into 
that  region  from  other  kingdoms  to  buy  the  smuggled  furs 
and  is  disliked  by  the  savages,  who  complain  that  years  ago  he 
treated  them  cruelly,  so  that  they  will  not  deal  with  him  but  on  the 
contrary  try  to  affront  him,  to  the  Company's  injury,  as  by  way 
of  revenge  they  have  already  burned  the  yacht  de  Bever  which  was 
anchored  there,  and  according  to  rumor  (as  the  remonstrant  is 
informed  by  letter)  they  seem  to  have  killed  all  the  remonstrant's 
animals,  horses,  cows,  sheep  and  hogs,  apparently  also  on  account 
of  the  hatred  they  bear  towards  him."  The  details  of  this  cruelty 
toward  the  savages  are  set  forth  in  an  examination  of  Bastiaen 
Jansen  Krol,  conducted  at  Amsterdam  before  Notary  Justus  van 
de  Ven  on  June  30,  1634,  of  which  a  translation  is  printed  on  pages 
302-4  of  the  Van  Rensselaer  Bowier  Manuscripts.  It  must  have 
been  committed  in  1622,  when  Hunthum  traded  with  the  savages 
under  a  permit  issued  by  the  States  General  on  September  15, 
1621.  The  news  of  Hunthum 's  death  does  not  seem  to  have  reached 
Holland  until  the  return  of  the  ship  Eendracht  in  November  1635. 
This  ship  had  sailed  from  Holland  for  New  Netherland  in  the  be- 
ginning of  May  1634.  It  reached  New  Netherland  shortly  before 
August  of  that  year  and  seems  to  have  left  the  country  the  same 
year,  but  to  have  been  held  up  on  its  return  voyage,  for  on  May 
24,  1635,  Van  Rensselaer  wrote  to  Wouter  van  Twiller:  "If  de 


232  A.  J.  F.  VAN  LAER 

Eendracht  has  been  wrecked  in  coming  hither,  many  returning 
people  must  have  gone  down  with  her.  We  must  trust  to  the  Lord 
for  the  outcome.  The  directors  are  very  much  alarmed.  They 
do  not  know  what  may  be  the  state  of  affairs  over  there,  since 
they  have  received  no  letters  from  you  by  way  of  Virginia  or  New 
England."  As  soon  as  the  Eendracht  arrived  at  Amsterdam,  steps 
seem  to  have  been  taken  by  the  widow  and  the  relatives  of  Hun- 
thum  to  prosecute  Comelis  van  Vorst  for  the  manslaughter  (see 
minutes  of  the  Amsterdam  Chamber  of  Nov.  12  and  Dec.  3,  1635, 
printed  in  A^.  Y.  Gen.  and  Biog.  Record,  July  1918,  p.222,  223). 
Of  these  proceedings,  the  present  deposition  evidently  formed  a  part. 

The  deponent,  Comelis  Maesen  van  Buren,  the  ancestor  of  the 
Van  Buren  family  in  this  country,  had  been  engaged  by  Kiliaen 
van  Rensselaer  as  a  farm  hand  on  May  27,  1631,  for  a  term  of  three 
years,  commencing  from  the  date  of  his  arrival  in  the  colony.  He 
sailed  on  the  ship  Eendracht  after  July  7,  1631,  and  apparently 
left  the  colony  shortly  after  August  2,  1634,  when  his  account  was 
closed.  He  returned  to  Holland,  as  stated,  in  November  1635, 
married,  and  again  entered  into  a  contract  with  the  patroon  on 
August  15,  1636.  He  sailed  with  his  wife,  Catel3mtje  Martens,  and 
a  farm  servant  named  Comelis  Teunissen  van  Westbroeck  on  the 
ship  Rensselaerswyck  on  October  8,  1636,  and  arrived  in  the  colony 
for  the  second  time  about  April  17,  1637.  On  the  voyage,  a  son 
was  bom,  named  Hendrick  Comelissen.  His  farm,  to  which 
allusion  is  made  in  the  deposition,  was  located  on  Papscanee  Island, 
opposite  Fort  Orange. 

Comelis  van  Vorst,  the  man  who  came  to  blows  with  Hans 
Jorissen  Hunthum,  was  director  of  Michiel  Pauw's  colony  of  Pa- 
vonia.  He  was  to  sail  in  1630  with  his  wife  and  children,  but  was 
unexpectedly  delayed  by  his  superiors,  so  that  his  wife  and  children 
sailed  ahead  and  he  followed  later.  He  was  apparently  related  to 
Amoldus  Buchelius,  a  director  of  the  Dutch  East  India  Company, 
whose  memoranda  concerning  the  East  and  West  India  Companies 
for  1619-1638,  are  among  the  Koloniale  Aanwinsten  in  the  General 
State  Archives  at  The  Hague.  In  these  memoranda,  Buchelius 
makes  the  statement  that  "Johan  van  Voorst,  a  clever  boy  of  14 
years,"  whom  he  refers  to  as  neefken,  or  little  cousin,  sailed  in  1631 
to  New  Netherland  to  visit  his  father,  and  returned  in  1632  with 
the  director,  secretary  and  minister,  in  other  words,  Peter  Minuit, 


EARLY  DUTCH  MANUSCRIPTS  233 

Johan  van  Remunde  and  the  Rev.  Jonas  Michaelius.  He  also 
states  that  whereas  Pauw  had  appointed  "ComeHs  van  Voorst,  with 
order  to  obey  no  one's  commands  but  his,  the  said  van  Voorst  has 
more  than  once  come  into  conflict  about  it  with  the  commander 
general,  yes,  has  gone  so  far  as  to  refuse  to  post  the  placards  issued 
in  the  name  of  the  Company,  or  to  obey  them,  so  that  he  was 
arrested  and  a  dispute  arose,  with  the  result  that  at  last  he  stabbed 
the  vice  director." 

The  above  deposition  is  referred  to  in  a  footnote  to  Mr  de  Roev- 
er's  articles  on  "Kiliaen  van  Rensselaer  and  his  Colony  of  Rens- 
selaerswyck,"  printed  in  English  translation  in  the  Van  Rensselaer 
Boivier  Manuscripts,  but  has  heretofore  not  been  published  in  full. 
Incidentally,  it  furnishes  an  illustration  of  the  importance  of  the 
notarial  records  in  the  Netherlands  as  a  source  for  the  early  history 
of  the  State  of  New  York. 

A.  J.  F.  VAN  Laer 


AN  OGDENSBURG  LETTER  OF  i8ii 

Note 

The  following  letter  was  found  in  November  1921,  by  Mr. 
Clarence  R.  Williams  of  Rutgers  College  while  examining  a  box 
of  old  papers  which  his  father  had  brought  from  his  home  in 
Terryville,  Conn.     In  sending  it  to  us  he  says: 

"Most  of  the  papers  were  of  family  interest,  except  a  letter 
written  to  my  great  grandfather,  Washington  Williams  of  Rocky 
Hill  by  his  brother  Rev.  Comfort  Williams,  a  graduate  of  Yale  in 
the  class  of  1908  and  a  student  but  not  a  graduate  of  Andover 
Theological  Seminary,  (his  health  failed  and  he  had  to  leave). 
He  was,  I  believe,  the  first  pastor  at  Rochester,  New  York." 
Ogdensburgh,  County  of  St.  Lawrence,  State  of  New  York, 

July  22nd,    1811. 
Dear  Brother: — 

I  have  for  some  time  contemplated  writing  to  you  and  giving 
you  a  brief  sketch  of  this  part  of  our  country;  stating  the  ad- 
vantages &  disadvantages  attending  the  farmer.  I  am  induced 
to  write,  knowing  that  you  have,  for  some  years  back,  had  a 
desire  to  leave  Rockyhill,  &  move  where  you  could  find  better 
land,  &  have  your  farm  lie  together.  Experience,  I  trust,  has 
taught  you  the  disadvantages  of  laboring  upon  poor,  worn-out 
land;  &  that  scattered  in  piecemeals  all  over  town.  Experience 
has  also  taught  you  the  disadvantage  of  cultivating  land  at  the 
halves.  Many  are  the  embarrisments  under  which  you  lie.  It 
may  be  needless  for  me  to  attempt  an  enumeration,  since  you  are 
better  acquainted  v/ith  your  situation  than  I  can  possibly  be. 

Now  if  you  wish  to  better  your  situation  in  some  degree,  I 
think  that  I  can  tell  you  how  it  can  be  done.  I  may  venture  to 
submit  a  few  things  to  your  consideration,  not  doubting  but  that 
they  will  receive  due  attention,  as  coming  from  one  deeply  in- 
terested in  your  welfare.  What  I  would  wish,  is  this,  that  you 
would  visit  this  part  of  the  country.  I  hesitate  not,  to  say  that 
you  would  be  pleased  with  the  country,  &  with  the  advantages 
to  be  derived  by  a  farm  here.  The  country  is  pleasant  tho' 
new.  The  land  on  the  river  St.  Lawrence  is  remarkable  for 
pleasantness.     When  we  stand  on  one  bank  of  the  river  &  look 

234 


^A^  OGDENSBURG  LETTER  235 

across,  the  farms  on  the  opposite  side  appear  really  beautiful. 
The  river  is  one  of  the  finest  in  the  world ;  it  is  about  a  mile  &  an 
half  or  three  quarters  wide. 

The  face  of  the  country  is  generally  level,  forming  most  ex- 
cellent flats  or  meadows;  which  are  not  so  low  but  that  they  are 
good  for  pasturing,  for  wheat,  com,  hemp  &c.  The  soil  is  generally 
good.  The  highest  land  is  rather  inclined  to  be  sandy :  the  lowest 
is  a  black,  rich  soil,  easily  subdued,  &  very  productive;  the  land 
which  lies  between  these  two  kinds  is  rather  clayey.  None  of  the 
land  lies  very  high.  In  some  places  the  soil  is  thin;  this  is  the 
case  in  this  village,  but  up  the  river,  a  quarter  or  half  mile  it  is 
much  better — by  digging  1>^  or  2  feet  we  come  to  a  bed  of  lime- 
stone which  is  very  serviceable  in  this  country. 

I  will  give  you  some  of  the  advantages  to  be  derived  by  a  farmer 
who  will  settle  down  near  this  village. 

The  first  enquiry  with  most  persons  would  be;  Is  it  healthy? 
It  is  so  considered.  The  fever  ague  does  not  prevail  here;  so  I 
am  told.  There  is  now  and  then  an  instance  of  the  billious  fever : 
principally  among  laboring  men.  It  is  attributed  to  their  im- 
prudence. It  is  a  common  practice  for  hired  men,  after  their 
day's  work  is  finished,  to  herd  together.  I  have  often  seen  a 
number  of  them  lying  on  the  banks  of  the  river  without  any  coat 
on,  as  late  as  9  o'clock  in  the  evening;  than  which  nothing  could 
be  more  injurious  to  the  health;  considering  that  the  dews  are 
heavy,  the  evening  air  very  damp.  2.  Fertility  of  the  soil. 
The  soil  is  very  good,  producing  in  abundance  all  kinds  of  grain, 
grasses  &  vegitables  that  can  be  raised  with  you.  I  have  seen 
some  fine  fields  of  wheat  yielding  from  25  to  40  bushels  the  acre, 
which  may  be  sold  for  $1.50  per  bushel  ready  market.  Oats 
flourish  remarkably  well.  Hemp  may  be  raised  to  any  extent,  and 
will  command  a  good  price.  Up  the  river  they  raise  vast  quantities 
of  this  article  which  is  sent  down  to  Montreal  or  Quebeck.  Some 
I  have  been  told  raise  100  acres,  calculating  to  make  50  Dol's 
clear  profit  on  each  acre.  It  is  now  selHng  for  200  to  250  Dol.  per 
ton.  Com  is  not  so  sure  a  crop  owing  to  frosts — but  some  seasons 
it  does  remarkably  well — it  will  fetch  .75.  cts  or  1.  Dol  per  bushel. 
Potatoes  grow  very  well — are  sold  for  40  or  50  cts — have  been  sold 
for  $1.  the  bushel.  White  beans  are  an  important  article — will 
bring  1.  Dol  or  1.40  per  bushel.     Grass  grows  very  stout — will 


236  COMFORT  WILLIAMS 

fetch  $8  or  10  per  ton.  I  shall  not  have  room  to  entinierate  every 
article  of  produce  which  will  be  useful  for  the  farmer  to  raise. 
Apple  trees  flourish  very  well  [omission  in  the  manuscript]  be 
important,  here  as  there  are  none  of  any  size.  If  a  person  thinks 
that  he  cannot  do  without  cider,  he  may  get  as  much  as  he  pleases 
by  going  up  to  the  genesee  country :  which  may  be  done  in  a  few 
days:  vessels  passing  up  and  down  the  river  St.  Lawrence  con- 
tinually. Cider  may  be  got  very  cheap  up  there. — A  person  may 
make  his  own  sugar  and  molases  if  he  please,  &  that  which  is  good ; 
by  means  of  the  sugar  maple.  Salt  may  be  obtained  very  cheap 
up  at  the  salt  works. — Wood  in  abundance.  Timber  an  important 
article.  Vast  quantities  sent  down  to  Montreal — price,  from  20 
to  40  cts,  per  foot.  Plenty  of  time  here.  The  farmer  is  not 
obliged  to  labor  all  winter  in  getting  wood.  He  may  spend  it  in 
threshing  out  his  wheat;  or  dressing  his  hemp;  or  in  preparing 
his  timber  for  rafting,  or  in  enjoying  his  ease  before  his  fire.  The 
farmer  may  in  this  town  keep  100  head  of  cattle  thro'  the  summer 
without  having  it  cost  him  a  cent.  Fat  cattle  an  important 
article — beef  from  o  to  6  or  6>^  Dol — hundred.  Pork  from  16  to 
24  Dol.  bar. — Poultry  would  command  a  great  price.  Butter  18 
cts  per  lb.  Cheese  12  cts.  Milk  6  cts.  per.  Quart.  I  will  not  en- 
large. The  statement  I  have  made  will  enable  you  to  form  some 
estimate  of  the  advantages  to  be  derived  from  a  farm  in  this  town. 
Let  a  good  farmer  come  here,  &  he  would  without  doubt  in  a  few 
years  make  a  handsome  property.  There  are  some  farmers  here 
but  they  dont  understand  the  business.  There  are  some  good 
farms  for  sale;  some  entirely  new  and  others  partly  subdued. 

I  wish  \-ou  would  come  on  here  &  look  for  yourself.  I  will 
assure  you  the  assistance  of  some  of  the  first  men  here.  The 
country  is  [  ?  ]  and  it  is  the  desire  of  the  principal  characters 
to  encourage  men  of  principle  to  come  on  here.  The  price  of  land 
is  various — from  7  to  **  &  even  to  1200  per  acres  (This  in  village 
plot).  Be  so  good  as  to  write,  &  tell  me  yom-  mind  about  this 
subject.  If  you  will  give  any  encouragement  about  coming,  I 
will  look  around  and  get  the  refusal  of  a  good  tract  of  land. 

I  am  much  pleased  with  this  country.  I  cannot  say  but  that  I 
shall  alter  my  mind.  One  thing  I  ought  to  have  mentioned; 
there  is  considerable  good  society  here.  There  are  also  some 
very  enterprising  men,  who  will  do  much  toward  building  up 


AN  OGDENSBURG  LETTER  237 

society.  It  is  in  contemplation  to  build  an  academy  soon.  And 
in  process  of  time,  if  the  town  &  country  continue  to  settle  as  they 
have  for  a  few  years  past,  they  will  establish  a  college  in  this 
village.  This  village  has  grown  surprisingly.  15  years  ago  there 
was  but  one  inhabitant  in  this  town,  7  years  ago  there  were  but  3 
families ;  &  now  there  are,  only  in  this  village,  between  40  and  50 
houses — crowded  full  of  inhabitants — some  houses  having  three 
families — &  those  large.  I  shall,  most  probably,  return  to  Con- 
necticut towards  the  last  of  October ;  I  should  be  glad  if  you  could 
make  it  in  your  way  to  visit  me  before  that  time  &  return  with  me. 
I  am  not  employed  as  a  Missionary,  but  am  preaching  statedly  in 
this  village,  on  probation  for  settlement — salary  to  be  600  Dol — 
if  I  accept  of  an  invitation  to  stay. 

From  your  affectionate  brother — 

Comfort  Williams. 
Give  my  respects  to  our  friends. 

I  have  not  yet  received  any  intelligence  from  home  since  my 
arrival  at  this  place — I  am  at  a  loss  to  accoimt  for  it — Can  you 
tell  me   the   reason — I   fear — 
Addressed : 

Mr.  Washington  Williams 
Wethersfield 
Rockyhill 
Connecticut 


OBITUARIES 

By  George  A.   Ingalls 

MiLO  M.  Acker  of  Homell  died  at  the  Highland  Hospital 
in  Rochester  August  11,  1922,  after  many  years  of  ill  health.  He 
was  bom  of  Dutch-American  parentage  at  Hartsville  Oct.  3,  1853. 

Until  he  became  of  age  he  worked  on  his  father's  farm  and  in 
the  lumber  woods.  The  little  spare  time  he  had  was  given  to 
study.  He  was  a  student  for  a  time  at  Alfred  University,  where 
he  maintained  himself  on  the  money  he  had  saved. 

In  1879  and  1880  Mr.  Acker  was  supervisor  of  Hartsville. 
In  1881  he  began  the  study  of  law  in  the  office  of  Judge  Hakes  at 
Homellsville ;  in  1883  he  was  admitted  to  the  bar;  in  1885  he 
became  a  partner  in  the  firm  of  Judge  Hakes.  He  enjoyed  marked 
success  in  the  practice  of  the  law. 

He  was  recorder  of  Homellsville  in  1886;  city  attorney  for  two 
terms  under  Mayor  Nelson;  city  attorney  again  under  Mayor 
Charles.  He  served  also  as  a  member  of  the  board  of  education, 
as  tmstee  of  the  public  library  and  as  vice-president  of  the  Hornell 
fair.  He  held  membership  in  the  masonic  fraternity  and  other 
social  organizations. 

Mr.  Acker  served  four  terms  in  the  state  assembly  and  was  a 
prominent  member  of  many  important  committees.  In  1890  he 
was  chairman  of  the  judiciary  committee.  The  following  year  he 
was  the  Republican  candidate  for  the  speakership  and  Republican 
leader  of  the  assembly.  He  was  one  of  the  ablest  debaters  in  the 
assembly. 

Mr.  Acker  was  a  member  of  the  State  Constitutional  Con- 
vention of  1894  and  of  its  committee  on  rules.  In  1904  he  became 
a  member  of  the  State  Water  Supply  Commission  and  remained  a 
member   for   five   years. 

Mrs.  Willard  Shurtleff  Augsbury  died  suddenly  at  the 
Presbyterian  Hospital  in  New  York  City,  June  17,  1920,  after  an 
operation  for  appendicitis. 

She  was  the  daughter  of  John  Davis  Ellis  and  Mary  Jane  Buell 
Ellis,  and  was  bom  April  25,  1863,  at  Antwerp,  New  York,  where 
she  spent  her  entire  life.     Her  early  education  was  received  at 

238 


OBITUARIES  239 

Antwerp  and  she  was  afterwards  a  special  student  of  Vassar  Col- 
lege. She  was  married  to  Willard  S.  Augsbury  September  12, 
1893.  Her  mother,  her  husband  and  one  sister,  Mrs.  Ira  M.  Bea- 
man  of  Westboro,  Mass.,  survive  her. 

Mrs.  Augsbury  was  a  member  of  LeRay  de  Chaumont  Chapter 
of  the  Daughters  of  the  American  Revolution.  She  was  a  regent 
of  her  chapter  from  1906  to  1908,  state  regent  from  1912  to  1914, 
a  member  of  the  national  board  of  the  D.  A.  R.  for  several  years 
and  historian  general  for  two  years  of  the  national  organization 
under  the  administration  of  Mrs.  William  Story.  She  was  a  mem- 
ber of  the  Colonial  Dames,  the  Massachusetts  Society  of  May- 
flower Descendants,  the  Daughters  of  Founders  and  Patriots  of 
America  and  the  Northern  Federation  of  Women's  Clubs.  She 
was  a  member  and  for  years  the  president  of  the  Antwerp  Satur- 
day Club.  With  Miss  Miriam  Conklin  she  selected  every  book  of 
the  Antwerp  library  and  was  active  in  other  ways  in  its  manage- 
ment. She  was  a  member  of  the  Congregational  Church  of  Ant- 
werp and  was  interested  in  all  its  work.  At  the  centennial  of  the 
church  in  1919  she  was  the  historian  and  the  account  of  the  church 
which  she  read  in  the  coiu"se  of  the  celebration  was  of  great  interest. 

Mrs.  Augsbury  was  a  capable  and  energetic  woman.  What- 
ever she  undertook  she  did  wholeheartedly.  She  was  cheerful 
and  companionable — an  essential  part  of  every  worthwhile  activity 
for  the  benefit  of  Antwerp. 

Isabel  Wolfe  Baruch  died  November  24,  1921,  at  the  home  of 
her  son.  Sailing  W.  Baruch,  312  West  Seventy-third  Street,  New 
York  City.     She  was  seventy-two  years  old. 

vShe  was  the  daughter  of  Sailing  Wolfe,  a  cotton  planter  of 
Winnsboro,  South  Carolina,  and  married  Dr.  Simon  Baruch 
November  27,  1867.  They  removed  to  New  York  City  in  1881. 
Dr.  Baruch  had  been  surgeon  in  the  field  in  the  army  of  General 
Robert  E.  Lee  from  1862  to  1865.  After  his  removal  to  New 
York  he  specialized  as  a  consulting  physician  in  chronic  diseases. 
He  diagnosed  the  first  recorded  case  of  perforating  appendicitis 
successfully  operated  on.  He  died  in  June  1921  and  from  that 
time  Mrs.  Baruch  gradually  lost  strength.  Four  sons  survived 
her.  Dr.  Herman  B.  Baruch,  Hartwig  R.  Baruch,  Bernard  M. 
Baruch,  the  financier,  and  the  son  already  named. 


240  OBITUARIES 

Mrs.  Baruch  was  active  in  women's  clubs.  She  took  a  prominent 
part  in  the  restoration  of  the  Jumel  Mansion.  She  was  a  former 
regent  of  the  Knickerbocker  Chapter  of  the  Daughters  of  the 
American  Revolution  and  honorary  president  of  the  New  York 
Division  of  the  United  Daughters  of  the  Confederacy. 

James  Gage  Beemer  was  bom  in  Hamilton,  Ontario,  January 
16,  1849,  and  was  the  son  of  Levi  and  Eliza  Gage  Beemer.  He 
died  at  his  home,  170  Shonnard  Terrace,  Yonkers,  May  6,  1921, 
and  was  buried  in  Greenwood  cemetery. 

Mr.  Beemer  moved  to  the  United  States  in  early  manhood. 
He  was  one  of  the  first  settlers  on  Shonnard  Terrace,  a  residen- 
tial district  then  undeveloped.  He  was  president  of  the  Chestnut 
Ridge  Corporation  of  New  York  City,  and  of  the  Phenix  Mineral 
Products  Corporation  and  was  a  stockholder  in  other  corpora- 
tions. 

For  many  years  he  gave  a  large  part  of  his  time  to  philanthropy. 
He  organized  the  Hand-in-Hand  Restaurants  on  the  Bowery, 
where  meals  were  sold  for  five  cents,  and  was  president  of  the 
Hand-in-Hand  Supply  Company.  For  fifteen  years  he  was 
president  of  the  Industrial  Christian  Alliance  of  New  York  City. 
He  was  one  of  the  founders  of  the  Young  Men's  Christian  Associa- 
tion of  Yonkers,  at  one  time  president  of  its  board  of  trustees,  and 
chairman  of  the  board  of  trustees  of  the  Young  Women's  Christian 
Association  of  Yonkers  at  his  death ;  a  life  member  of  the  Charity 
Organization  Society  and  Society  for  the  Prevention  of  Cruelty  to 
Children  of  Yonkers;  a  life  director  of  the  American  Bible  Society; 
a  trustee  for  many  years  of  the  First  Presbyterian  Church  of 
Yonkers ;  a  former  member  of  the  board  of  education  of  the  city ; 
a  Son  of  the  American  Revolution  and  a  member  of  Jonkheer 
Lodge  F.  &  A.  M. 

He  married  Margaret  L.  Barclay.  His  sons.  Miles  W.  Beemer 
and  James  G.  Beemer,  jr.,  and  his  daughters,  Mrs.  Edward  B. 
Church  and  Mrs.  Wilfred  E.  Smith  survived  him. 

John  Henry  Brandow,  a  trustee  of  the  New  York  State 
Historical  Association  since  1908,  died  at  his  home  in  Schoharie, 
N.  Y.,  October  14,  1921.  The  survivors  of  his  immediate  family 
were  his  wife,  who  was  Miss  Selinda  Bronson  of  Mohawk,  N.  Y., 
a  son,  William  H.  Brandow  of  Middleburg,  N.  Y.,  and  two  daugh- 


OBITUARIES  241 

ters,  Mrs.  H.N.  Trumbull  of  Cleveland,  and  Mrs.  J.  U.  Koree  of 
New  York. 

Mr.  Brandow  was  a  descendant  of  an  emigrant  from  the  Pala- 
tinate in  1710.  His  father  was  William  Henry  Brandow,  a  farmer 
and  fruit-grower,  and  his  early  life  was  spent  in  Windham,  N.  Y., 
where  he  was  bcirn  September  20, 1853,  and  in  Esopus  and  Coxsackie. 
His  mother  was  Moycah  Houghtaling  Brandow. 

Mr.  Brandow  attended  school  at  Hudson  Institute  in  Claverack, 
N.  Y.,  and  Coxsackie  Academy.  He  decided  to  study  for  the 
ministry  at  an  age  when  most  candidates  for  the  ministry  have 
completed  their  courses  of  preparatory  study  in  college  and  semi- 
nary. He  did  not  on  that  account  seek  for  any  dispensation  or 
"short  cut."  He  entered  Rutgers  College  in  1879  and  was  gradu- 
ated in  1883  as  valedictorian,  then  a  rhetorical  honor,  and  a 
member  of  Phi  Beta  Kappa.  His  younger  classmates  found  him 
a  congenial  associate;  he  was  the  main-stay  of  the  college  choir, 
prominent  in  Philo,  Targtun  editor,  president  of  the  Bible  Society, 
preacher  at  the  cremation  of  Freeman's  Outlines,  and  holder  of 
several  class  offices.  After  graduation  from  Rutgers  he  took  a 
full  course  at  New  Brunswick  Seminary,  supplemented  by  vaca- 
tion work  in  various  fields,  and  was  graduated  therefrom  in  1886. 

In  June  1886  he  was  licensed  by  the  classis  of  Greene  and  in  the 
following  month  ordained  by  the  classis  of  Montgomery.  His 
pastorates  were:  Reformed  Church,  Mohawk,  N.  Y.,  1886-1888; 
Presbyterian  Church,  Oneonta,  N.  Y.,  1888-1895;  Reformed 
Church,  Schuylerville,  N.  Y.,  1895-1905;  Reformed  Church, 
Schoharie,   N.   Y.,    1905-1908. 

In  1908  he  was  elected  synodical  superintendent  or  missionary 
by  the  Particular  Synod  of  Albany.  This  position  he  held  until 
two  weeks  before  his  death.  The  estimate  which  his  church  put 
upon  his  work  as  synodical  missionary  is  in  part  in  the  following 
words :  "He  was  not  satisfied  with  perfunctory  service  but  made  an 
earnest  effort  to  improve  the  condition  of  the  vacant  congrega- 
tions which  were  his  particular  care " 

During  most  of  the  time  he  was  synodical  missionary  he  lived 
in  Albany.  The  study  of  history  was  his  recreation  and  historic 
research  a  veritable  passion.  He  availed  himself  of  the  State 
Library  for  the  prosecution  of  his  study  and  research.  He  wrote 
monographs  on  General  Horatio  Gates,  on  Washington's  retreat 


242  OBITUARIES 

through  Westchester  County,  and  on  General  Daniel  Morgan, 
which  appear  in  Vols.  III.,  IX.,  and  XII.  of  the  Proceedings  of  the 
New  York  State  Historical  Association.  His  most  notable 
historic  work  is  "The  Story  of  Old  Saratoga,  to  which  is  added 
New  York's  Share  in  the  Revolution."  The  New  York  Evening 
Post  said  of  this  book:  "The  Story  of  Old  Saratoga  is  a  marvel  of 
painstaking  research,  careful  scholarship  and  patient  labor. 
In  compiling  his  facts  the  author  has  read  thousands  of  letters, 
reports,  records  and  unpublished  docimients.  This  finished  work 
will  be  a  joy  to  the  historian  and  antiquary." 

Thomas  Carmody,  son  of  Thomas  and  Mary  Connors  Carmody, 
bom  at  Milo,  Yates  County,  N.  Y.,  October  9,  1859,  died  at  his 
home  in  New  Rochelle,  N.  Y.,  January  22,  1922. 

He  attended  school  at  Penn  Yan  Academy,  taught  school  for 
two  years,  and  was  a  student  at  Cornell  University  from  1878  to 
1881.  He  studied  law  in  the  office  of  A.  A.  Hungerford  of  Ithaca. 
In  1886  he  was  admitted  to  the  bar  and  practiced  law  in  Penn  Yan 
until   1911. 

Governor  David  B.  Hill  appointed  him  district  attorney  of 
Yates  County  in  1889.  He  was  chief  examiner  of  the  state  civil 
service  commission  from  1893  to  1896.  In  1910  he  was  elected 
attorney  general  of  the  State  of  New  York  and  in  1912  he  was 
reelected.  During  his  second  term  he  resigned  and  went  to  New 
York  City  to  practice  law,  where  he  was  in  partnership  with 
George  J.  Blauvelt  and  Joseph  A.  Kellogg. 

Mr.  Carmody  was  a  Democrat  of  state-wide  influence.  He  was 
chairman  of  the  state  convention  of  his  party  held  at  Carnegie 
Hall  in   1908. 

He  was  a  member  of  the  Beta  Theta  Pi  and  Phi  Alpha  Delta 
fraternities  and  the  New  York  State  Bar  Association.  Among  his 
clubs  were  the  Catholic  of  New  York,  the  National  Democratic, 
and  the  Fort  Orange  of  Albany. 

His  wife,  who  was  Miss  Agnes  Flinn  of  Albany,  four  daughters 
and  three  sons  survived  him. 

Emory  Albert  Chase  on  the  afternoon  of  June  25,  1921,  re- 
tired to  his  room  for  a  little  sleep.  When  Mrs.  Chase  went  to  his 
bedside  late  in  the  afternoon  she  found  that  he  was  dead.  In  the 
morning  he  had  received  a  thorough  examination  by  his  physician 
and  it  was  thought  that  years  of  further  usefulness  awaited  him. 


OBITUARIES  243 

He  was  bom  August  31,  1854.  He  was  a  descendant  of  Thomas 
Chase  of  Chesham,  England,  who  came  to  America  about  1639, 
and  a  great-grandson  of  Zephaniah  Chase,  a  soldier  of  the  Revolu- 
tion, who  moved  to  Lexington,  N.  Y.,  in  1787.  His  parents  were 
Albert  and  Laura  Orinda  Woodworth  Chase.  On  his  mother's 
side  he  was  of  Scottish  ancestry.  Albert  Chase  was  a  contractor, 
builder,  lumberman,  and  finally  a  farmer,  and  it  was  on  a  farm 
that  he  reared  his  three  children,  Lydia  (afterwards  Mrs.  Cyrus 
E.  Bloodgood),  Demont  and  Emory.  In  1885  Emory  Chase 
married  Mary  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Addison  Jesse 
Churchill  of  Prattsville,  who  with  their  two  children,  Albert  Wood- 
worth  Chase,  and  Jessie  Churchill  Chase  (now  Mrs.  James Lew^is 
Malcolm),  survived  him. 

Emory  Chase  attended  the  Hensonville  school  and  Fort  Edward 
Collegiate  Institute.  In  1880  he  began  to  study  law  in  the  office 
of  Rufus  H.  King  and  Joseph  Hallock  in  Catskill.  After  his  ad- 
mission to  the  bar  and  the  retirement  of  Mr.  King  he  entered  the 
firm  of  Hallock,  Jennings  and  Chase  in  1882.  Mr.  Hallock  retired 
in  1890  and  the  succeeding  firm  of  Jennings  and  Chase  was  dis- 
solved in  1896  after  the  election  of  Mr.  Chase  as  justice  of  the 
supreme  court  for  the  third  judicial  district  of  the  State  of  New 
York. 

In  January  1901  Justice  Chase  was  designated  by  Governor 
Odell  as  one  of  the  justices  of  the  appellate  division  of  the  supreme 
court  in  the  third  department.  In  January  1906  he  was  designated 
by  Governor  Higgins  with  Justices  Willard  Bartlett  and  Frank  H. 
Hiscock  to  serve  as  associate  judge  of  the  court  of  appeals.  He 
was  redesignated  by  Governor  Dix  in  January  1911  and  served 
continuously  as  a  designated  associate  judge  until  after  his  election 
as  associate  judge  of  the  court  in  1920.  He  had  served  a  few  days 
less  than  six  months  of  his  term  of  office  as  elected  judge  at  his 
death.  In  1910  he  was  renominated  by  both  Republicans  and 
Democrats  as  a  justice  of  the  supreme  court  for  the  third  judicial 
district  and  reelected.  His  opinions  are  to  be  found  in  fifty-foiu- 
volumes  of  reports  of  the  appellate  division  and  forty-eight  vol- 
umes of  reports  of  the  court  of  appeals. 

Judge  Chase  was  identified  with  the  interests  of  Catskill  from 
the  beginning  of  his  residence  there.  In  1882  he  was  elected  a 
member  of  the  board  of  education  and  he  continued  a  member  for 


244  OBITUARIES 

fourteen  years,  during  five  of  which  he  was  its  president.  He  was 
supervisor  of  the  town  in  1890,  corporate  counsel  for  many  years, 
retiring  in  1895;  first  vice-president  of  the  Catskill  Savings  Bank, 
director  of  the  Tanners'  National  Bank,  director  of  the  Cooperative 
and  Commercial  Mutual  Fire  Insurance  Companies;  trustee  of 
the  Presbyterian  Church.  At  the  formation  of  the  Catskill  Citi- 
zens Corps  he  was  enrolled  as  a  corporal.  Later  he  was  elected 
second  lieutenant  and  first  lieutenant,  holding  the  latter  office 
when  he  resigned  in  1884. 

The  Troy  Times  in  its  issue  of  June  27,  1921,  said  of  Judge 
Chase : 

"He  had  the  fundamentals  of  a  magistrate — the  sense  of  righteous- 
ness, the  modest  democracy  which  kept  his  mind  open  to  all  the 
phases  of  an  issue;  the  diligence,  the  courtesy,  the  friendliness, 
which,  while  retaining  the  mastery  which  belongs  to  the  courts, 
prevent  their  decrees  from  carrying  the  oppressive  atmosphere 
of  merely  arbitrary  authority.  Judge  Chase  was  a  wise  judge, 
and,  first  of  all,  because  he  was  a  good  man." 

William  Brown  Cogswell  died  at  his  residence,  320  Park 
Avenue,  New  York,  June  7,  1921.  His  parents  were  David  and 
Mary  Barnes  Cogswell.  He  was  boni  at  Oswego,  N.  Y.,  Sept. 
22,   1834. 

After  attending  school  in  Syracuse  and  Seneca  Falls,  N.  Y., 
he  was  a  student  at  Rensselaer  Polytechnic  Institute  from  1850  to 
1852.  In  1884  he  received  from  the  Institute  the  honorary  degree 
of    civil    engineer. 

Mr.  Cogswell  was  an  apprentice  in  the  Lawrence  (Mass.) 
Machine  Shop  from  1852  to  1855;  was  assistant  superintendent  of 
the  Marietta  and  Cincinnati  Railroad  from  1856  to  1859;  was  in 
the  U.  S.  Navy  from  1861  to  1865;  erected  and  operated  blast 
furnaces  at  Franklin  Iron  Works,  Oneida  County,  N.  Y.,  from 
1869  to  1873;  was  in  charge  of  mines  of  the  LaMotte  Estate, 
Mo.,  from  1874  to  1879;  established  the  Solvay  Process  Company 
in  1881,  of  which  he  was  vice-president  and  manging  director. 

At  a  meeting  of  the  American  Institute  of  Mining  Engineers  in 
Baltimore  in  1879  Mr.  Cogswell  heard  Oswald  J.  Heinrich,  a 
mining  engineer  of  Drifton,  Penn.,  read  a  paper  on  the  manu- 
facture of  ammonia  soda.     He  realized  the  possibilities  of  such  an 


OBITUARIES  245 

industry  at  Syracuse  and  went  to  Europe  to  advance  his  project 
At  first  he  met  with  no  encourgement  but  finally  succeeded  in. 
interesting  the  Solvay  brothers  of  Brussels.  With  the  develop- 
ment of  the  Solvay  Process  Mr.  Cogswell  became  a  leader  among 
miners  and  engineers. 

Andrew  Colvin  died  suddenly  on  April  1,  1921,  while  dis- 
cussing a  real  estate  title  in  the  office  of  Aaron  H.  Schwartz  at 
87  Nassau  Street,  New  York.  He  was  bom  at  New  Baltimore, 
Greene  County,  N.  Y.,  April  21,  1869.  His  parents  were  John 
and  Margaret  A.  Miller  Colvin.  After  attending  the  district 
school  he  was  graduated  from  the  Albany  Academy  and  in  1891 
from  the  Union  University  Law  School  with  the  degree  of  LL.B. 
He  was  admitted  to  the  bar  of  New  York  the  same  year. 

Mr.  Colvin  was  an  authority  on  the  law  of  libel  and  was  for 
many  years  connected  with  the  legal  department  of  the  New  York 
American.  Some  five  years  before  his  death  he  left  the  employ  of 
the  American  and  resumed  the  practice  of  law  for  himself.  He 
was  an  expert  on  the  laws  of  real  property  and  was  one  of  the 
most  highly  valued  lawyers  connected  with  the  New  York  Title 
and  Mortgage  Company. 

Mr.  Colvin  was  a  resident  of  Flatbush,  Brooklyn,  for  many 
years  and  was  prominent  as  a  civic  worker  in  that  district.  He 
was  a  former  president  of  the  Flatbush  Taxpayers  Association, 
member  of  the  Brooklyn  Chamber  of  Commerce,  the  21st  A.  D. 
Republican  Club,  the  New  York  Press  Club,  and  Social  Friend- 
ship Lodge  F.  &  A.  M.  of  New  Baltimore,  N.  Y. ;  a  member  and 
former  president  of  the  Greene  County  Society  of  New  York 
City.  His  clubs  were  the  New  York  Press  and  the  Union  League 
of  Brooklyn.     His  recreations  were  boating  and  fishing. 

His  wife,  Mary  Backus  Colvin,  his  mother,  of  New  Baltimore, 
N.  Y.,  and  two  sisters,  Mrs.  John  S.  Beach  of  Washington,  D.  C, 
and  Mrs.  B.  C.  Perry  of  Schenectady,  N.  Y.,  survived  him. 

John  Barkley  Conway,  son  of  John  Conway  and  Agnes  Bark- 
ley  Conway,  was  born  at  Argyle,  Washington  County,  New  York, 
August  25,  1858,  and  died  at  the  Samaritan  Hospital  in  Troy, 
January  28,  1921. 

Graduated  from  Union  College  in  1879  and  from  Albany  Law 
School  with  the  degree  of  LL.  B.  in  1881,  he  was  from  his  admission 


246  OBITUARIES 

to  the  bar  in  1881  until  his  death  engaged  in  the  practice  of  law  in 
the  town  of  his  nativity.  His  family  tree  was  deeply  rooted  in  the 
soil  of  his  home  town,  he  knew  the  personal  and  family  history  of 
every  one  for  miles  around,  his  general  education  and  professional 
training  were  in  advance  of  the  average  of  his  profession,  his  charac- 
ter commanded  respect  and  good  will.  It  followed  that  he  was 
the  trusted  advisor  of  the  community  and  a  leader  in  community 
enterprises.  He  was  one  of  the  founders  of  the  First  National 
Bank  of  Argyle  and  its  president  from  its  organization  until  his 
death;  president  of  the  Argyle  Cooperative  Fire  Insurance  Compa- 
ny; president  of  the  Argyle  Garage  Company;  treasurer  of  the 
Argyle  Elgin  Butter  and  Cheese  factory;  treasurer  of  the  United 
Presbyterian  Church  of  Argyle  from  1884  until  his  death;  super- 
visor of  the  town  of  Argyle  for  one  term ;  treasiu"er  of  Washington 
Cotmty  for  one  term.  He  was  a  member  of  the  New  York  State 
Bar  Association. 

June  21,  1889  he  married  Cora  Bell  Williams,  who  stu-vives. 
They  had  no  children. 

Another  old  fashioned  "family  lawyer"  has  passed  away;  a 
position  of  usefulness  and  honor  is  left  vacant  which  because  of 
changing  conditions  is  unlikely  to  be  filled. 

Georgianna  Hemingway  Cook,  widow  of  Joseph  Cook,  died 
August  3,  1921,  at  Cliff  Seat,  her  summer  home  in  South  Ticon- 
deroga.  She  was  eighty-one  3^ears  old.  Two  brothers,  Charles  S. 
Hemingway  of  Holyoke,  Mass.,  and  Frederick  H.  Hemingway  of 
New  Haven,  Conn.,  survived  her. 

Those  who  knew  her  characterize  her  as  a  woman  of  brilliant  in- 
tellect and  deep  culture.  It  was  a  matter  of  course  that  in  behalf 
of  the  Ticonderoga  Historical  Society  Mrs.  Cook  welcomed  the 
New  York  State  Historical  Association  to  Ticonderoga  at  the 
annual  meeting  of  1910.  Her  winters  were  spent  at  her  home  in 
Aubumdale,  Mass.,  but  during  the  many  summers  she  lived  in 
Ticonderoga  she  interested  herself  actively  in  everything  affecting 
the  welfare  of  the  town,  the  Congregational  Church,  of  which  she 
was  a  member,  and  her  many  friends. 

Thomas  S.  Coolidge  (he  disliked  the  use  of  his  middle  name 
Smead)  son  of  Jonathan  and  Mary  CooHdge,  was  bom  February 
8,   1839,  in  Bolton,  Warren  county,  N.  Y.,  and  died  in  Glens 


OBITUARIES  247 

Falls,  September  24,  1921.  For  nearly  seventy  years  he  was  an 
outstanding  personality  in  the  affairs  of  Warren  county  generally 
and  of  Glens  Falls  more  particularly. 

At  the  age  of  fourteen  he  entered  the  general  store  of  George  W. 
Lee  at  Horicon,  where  he  remained  until  the  autiunn  of  1859, 
when  he  became  a  student  at  Fort  Edward  Collegiate  Institute. 
The  following  spring  he  left  the  Institute  to  work  in  the  general 
store  of  Charles  Fowler  at  Chestertown,  N.  Y.  Not  long  after- 
wards he  formed  a  copartnership  with  Joseph  Fowler  which 
bought  the  business  of  Charles  Fowler  and  conducted  a  thriving 
general  store  until  the  end  of  the  War  between  the  States.  The 
copartnership  then  dissolved  and  Mr.  Coolidge  was  again  em- 
ployed by  George  W.  Lee  in  a  general  store,  but  this  time  in 
Glens  Falls  at  the  comer  of  Glen  and  Canal  Streets.  Mr.  Coo- 
lidge and  Mr.  Lee  as  copartners  afterwards  had  a  general  store  at 
the  comer  of  Glen  and  Exchange  Streets.  After  the  dissolution 
of  this  copartnership  Mr.  Coolidge  became  sales  agent  for  the 
lime  companies  then  active  in  Glens  Falls  and  vicinity. 

A  few  years  later  Thomas  S.  Coolidge,  his  brother  Jonathan  M. 
Coolidge,  George  W.  Lee  and  W.  W.  Jeffers  organized  the  Lake 
George  Paper  Company,  whose  mills  at  the  upper  falls  in  Ticon- 
deroga  are  now  owned  by  the  International  Paper  Company. 
After  the  sale  to  the  latter  company  Thomas  S.  Coolidge  was  a 
director  and  its  general  manager  of  transportation  with  head- 
quarters in  New  York  City.  He  resigned  the  managership  in 
1903  and  returned  to  Glens  Falls. 

Mr.  Coolidge  was  one  of  the  oldest  stockholders  of  the  Glens 
Falls  Insurance  Company,  a  member  of  its  executive  committee 
for  several  years  and  the  director  with  longest  term  of  service 
at  his  death.  He  was  a  director  of  the  National  Bank  of  Glens 
Falls  and  president  of  the  Jointa  Lime  Company,  both  for  many 
years.  He  had  extensive  holdings  of  real  estate  at  Dunham's 
Bay,  Basin  Bay  and  Tongue  Mountain,  Lake  George,  and  in 
West  Fort  Ann.  He  formerly  owned  Alice  Falls,  near  Ausable 
Chasm,  later  sold  to  the  Rogers  Pulp  and  Paper  Company. 

He  was  averse  to  holding  public  office,  but  after  the  incorpora- 
tion of  Glens  Falls  as  a  city  he  was  municipal  civil  service  com- 
missioner from  1908  to  1915. 


248  OBITUARIES 

For  many  years  he  was  a  trustee  and  elder  of  the  First  Presby- 
terian Church  of  Glens  Falls  and  one  of  the  strongest  supporters  of 
its  many  activities.  It  was  his  custom  to  stand  with  his  friend 
Col.  Cunningham  at  the  doors  of  the  church  auditorium  before  the 
Sunday  services  and  welcome  the  incoming  congregation. 

He  married  Georgiana  Palmer  October  1,  1867.  Surviving  him 
were  his  wife  and  one  daughter,  Gertrude,  wife  of  Arthur  William 
Sherman. 

Mary  Louise  Culver  died  in  August  1922.  In  response  to  a 
letter  of  inquiry  regarding  Mary  Louise  Culver,  late  of  Utica, 
N.  Y.,  addressed  to  Mrs.  Charles  A.  Spaulding  of  Saugerties, 
N.  Y.,  the  undersigned  was  referred  to  a  newspaper  clipping  which 
is  quoted  below: 

"The  death  of  Miss  Mary  Louise  Culver,  a  lifelong  resident  of 
Utica,  well  known  in  literary  and  art  circles  of  the  city,  occurred 
Saturday  night  at  her  home  1025  Park  Avenue. 

Miss  Culver  was  bom  in  Utica,  a  daughter  of  the  late  Abraham 
E.  and  Emelyn  Eliza  Culver.  She  attended  Grace  Episcopal 
Church.  Miss  Culver  was  a  member  of  the  New  Century  Club, 
the  B  Sharp  Club,  the  Leisure  Hour  Club,  and  the  Daughters  of 
the  Empire  State,  and  was  active  in  all  of  these  organizations. 
She  was  an  artist  of  recognized  talent  and  was  long  a  member  of 
the  Utica  Sketch  Club. 

Miss  Culver  is  survived  by  a  sister,  Mrs.  Charles  A.  Spaulding 
of  Saugerties,  and  two  brothers,  Edward  Culver  of  Albany  and 
William    Culver    of    Newport." 

Henry  Martyn  Denniston  was  the  fourth  son  of  Robert  and 
Mary  Scott  Denniston  and  was  bom  in  Washingtonville,  Orange 
county,  N.  Y.,  June  13,  1840.  He  died  May  23,  1922.  His 
father  was  comptroller  of  the  state  of  New  York  during  the  War 
between   the   States. 

He  was  a  member  of  the  class  of  1862  in  Yale.  At  the  begin- 
ning of  his  senior  year  he  left  college  and  was  appointed  an  assist- 
ant paymaster  in  the  navy  September  9,  186L  He  had  thirteen 
^rears  of  sea  service  in  the  course  of  which  he  made  cruises  in  the 
West  Indies,  the  South  Atlantic  and  the  Pacific.  He  was  stationed 
in  the  Portsmouth,  New  York,  Philadelphia  and  California  navy 
yards.     He  was  United  States  purchasing  pay  officer  in  New 


OBITUARIES  249 

York  City  the  last  three  years  of  his  service.  At  the  age  of  sixty- 
two  he  retired  with  the  rank  of  rear  admiral. 

Admiral  Denniston  was  married  to  Emma  J.  Dusenbtiry  of 
Jersey  City,  January  21,  18G9.  She  died  five  weeks  before  her 
husband.  Their  son,  Dr.  Robert  Denniston,  had  died  in  Novem- 
ber 1921.  A  week  after  the  death  of  his  wife  Admiral  Denniston 
was  stricken  with  paralysis  and  never  afterwards  regained  speech. 

Yale  conferred  upon  him  the  degree  of  A.  B.  in  1862  and  that 
of  A.  M.  in   1892.     He  was  a  member  of  the  Loyal  Legion. 

Rev.  James  Thomas  Dougherty  died  February  7,  1921,  at 
Phoenix,  Arizona,  where  he  had  gone  in  search  of  health.  His 
father  and  mother,  Patrick  and  Mary  Bannon  Dougherty,  were 
both  bom  in  West  Meath,  Ireland.  His  mother  came  to  this 
country  in  1845;  his  father,  a  year  later.  They  were  married  in 
this  country  and  engaged  in  farming. 

Their  son  James  Thomas  was  bom  in  Fayette,  Seneca  county, 
April  23,  1863.  He  received  his  early  education  in  the  Miller 
district  school  of  the  town  of  Romulus  and  the  Ovid  union  school. 
He  then  taught  a  year  in  the  town  of  Varick.  After  that  he  was  a 
student  at  St.  Andrew's  Seminary  in  Rochester  and  then  at  St. 
Joseph's  Seminary  in  Troy.  He  was  ordained  priest  October  28, 
1887.  He  had  temporary  charge  of  Honeoye  Falls  and  East  Rush 
parish  in  the  summer  of  1888.  He  became  assistant  at  St.  Mary's, 
Auburn,  in  October  1888;  pastor  at  Stanley  and  Rushville  in 
September  1890;  pastor  of  St.  Patrick's,  Dansville,  in  May  1893; 
pastor  of  St.  Agnes,  Avon,  in  June  1901;  pastor  of  St.  Mary's, 
Canandaigua,  In  September  1901. 

When  Father  Dougherty  came  to  Canandaigua  his  congregation 
was  worshipping  in  an  old  and  dilapidated  building.  The  parochial 
school  was  inadequately  housed  and  there  was  a  considerable  in- 
debtedness secured  by  mortgage  on  a  site  which  had  been  bought 
for  a  new  church.  He  first  brought  about  the  payment  of  the  ex- 
isting indebtedness  and  the  renovation  of  the  cemetery  in  Parrish 
Street.  In  1903  a  brown  stone  church  was  erected;  in  1908,  a 
brick  and  stone  rectory;  soon  afterwards  the  parochial  school 
building  was  enlarged.  The  completed  plant  of  St.  Mary's  church 
cost  more  than  $160,000,  of  which  amount  some  $15,000  only  was 
unpaid  when  he  died. 


250  OBITUARIES 

Father  Dougherty  fought  persistently  in  Canandaigua  and 
neighboring  towns  for  no-license  and  was  one  of  the  executive 
committee  that  led  the  temperance  forces  of  Canandaigua  to  vic- 
tory in  1918.  He  was  president  of  the  city  health  association,  an 
active  member  of  the  board  of  managers  of  the  coimty  tuberculosis 
hospital  from  the  time  of  its  first  organization,  and  a  member  of 
the  board  of  visitors  to  the  State  Hospital  for  the  Insane  at  Willard. 

He  w^as  a  member  of  the  Ontario  Historical  Society.  He  had 
made  a  close  study  of  the  early  Jesuit  missions  in  western  New 
York.  The  results  of  this  study  were  embodied  in  addresses 
which  he  delivered  in  Canandaigua  and  elsewhere  and  through 
his  efforts  monimients  commemorating  these  missions  were  erected. 
He  was  a  member  and  former  president  of  the  Canandaigua  Scien- 
tific Association,  before  which  he  made  addresses  on  various  sub- 
jects and  to  whose  debates  he  made  contributions  characterized  by 
humor  and  good  sense.  He  was  a  charter  member  of  the  local 
council  of  the  Knights  of  Columbus  and  of  the  Rotary  Club. 

Father  Dougherty  was  a  speaker  of  simplicity  and  force  both  in 
the  pulpit  and  on  the  platform,  but  however  much  he  had  at  heart 
the  cause  he  was  advocating  his  speech  was  marked  by  freedom 
from  bitterness  and  kindliness  of  judgment.  He  was  "interested 
in  the  well  being  of  every  person  within  the  wide  circle  of  his  ac- 
quaintance." The  notable  comity  and  cooperation  existing  be- 
tween the  Catholic  and  Protestant  churches  of  Canandaigua  is 
credited  to  him. 

John  Haldane  Flagler  died  at  his  country  home  in  Green- 
wich, Conn.,  September  9,  1922,  in  his  eighty-fifth  year.  He  was 
the  son  of  Harvey  K.,  and  Sarah  J.  Haldane  Flagler.  His  wife, 
Beatrice  Frances  Weneker,  a  daughter,  and  a  sister,  Mrs.  Herman 
Stumpf  of  Bel  Air,  Md.,  survived  him. 

Upon  the  completion  of  his  studies  at  the  Academy  in  Paterson, 
N.  J.,  Mr.  Flagler  refused  to  go  to  college  and  entered  the  employ 
of  Haldane  &  Company,  iron  dealers  of  New  York.  He  was 
manager  of  their  Boston  branch  for  several  years.  He  left  them  to 
organize  the  firm  of  John  H.  Flagler  &  Co.,  of  Boston,  manufactur- 
ers of  iron  and  steel.  He  organized  the  National  Tube  Works  of 
East  Boston.  The  growing  demand  for  tubing  due  to  the  ex- 
tension of  the  Pennsylvania  oil  fields  led  Mr.  Flagler  to  organize 


OBITUARIES  251 

a  branch  at  McKeesport,  Penn.,  which  became  the  center  of  the 
industry,  while  the  Boston  house  was  discontinued.  The  McKees- 
port company  was  reorganized  as  the  National  Tube  Company 
and  Mr.  Flagler  was  its  president  until  its  merger  with  the  United 
States  Steel  Corporation.  At  the  time  of  the  merger  there  were 
4,500  men  on  its  payroll. 

Mr.  Flagler  was  an  inventor  of  scientific  processes  of  value  to 
the  industry. 

He  was  a  director  of  the  Home  Insurance  Co.,  the  Bank  of 
Washington  Heights,  The  Consolidated  Arizona  Smelting  Co., 
the  Irving  Trust  Co. 

Lewis  Francis,  D.D.,  a  minister  for  more  than  sixty  years, 
died  at  his  summer  home,  Pinecroft,  Port  Henry,  N.  Y.,  Novem- 
ber 2,  1921.  He  was  bom  at  Royalton,  Vermont,  September  14, 
1836  of  New  England  stock.  He  was  graduated  from  the  Uni- 
versity of  Vermont  in  1856  and  from  Andover  Theological  Semi- 
nary in  1860. 

Dr.  Francis  was  ordained  to  the  Congregational  ministry  in 
1863  and  was  pastor  of  two  Congregational  churches  in  Vermont 
before  he  was  called  to  the  Kent  Street  Reformed  Church  in 
Brooklyn  in  1873.  After  thirty-one  years  of  service  in  this  church 
he  retired  as  pastor  emeritus  and  became  closely  associated  with 
the  civic  and  religious  interests  of  Port  Henry. 

His  wife,  who  was  Elizabeth  V.  Witherbee,  daughter  of  Mr. 
and  Mrs.  Silas  H.  Witherbee  of  Port  Henry,  died  in  1911.  Two 
sons,  Lewis  W.  Francis  of  Brooklyn,  and  Arthur  W.  Francis  of 
New  York,  one  daughter,  Mrs.  Ralph  Rogers  of  Pelham  Manor, 
and  seven  grandchildren  survived  Dr.  Francis. 

William  A.  Granger  was  bom  at  Cottenham,  Cambridge- 
shire, England,  and  came  to  this  coimtry  when  he  was  four  years 
old. 

He  was  a  student  at  Colgate  University  and  was  afterwards 
graduated  from  Union  Theological  Seminary.  He  was  pastor  of 
Baptist  churches  in  Long  Island  City,  Brewster  and  Owego,  N.  Y. 
He  went  from  the  last  named  church  to  the  First  Baptist  Church 
of  Mount  Vernon,  N.  Y.,  where  he  remained  fifteen  years.  He 
was  then  president  of  the  Baptist  State  Convention  of  New  York, 
from  which  position  he  retired  in  October,  1921,  after  fourteen 


252  OBITUARIES 

years  of  service.  During  his  presidency  he  visited  every  Baptist 
church  in  the  state.  He  was  the  only  president  who  completed 
this  visitation. 

Dr.  Granger  was  present  at  a  meeting  of  the  parishioners  of  the 
First  Baptist  Church  of  Moimt  Vernon  on  Sunday,  September  10, 
1922,  which  had  assembled  to  welcome  the  new  pastor.  Dr. 
Granger,  who  was  to  make  an  address  of  welcome,  had  walked  to 
the  communion  table  when  he  was  fatally  stricken  with  apoplexy. 
He  was  seventy-two  years  old. 

He  was  a  member  of  Hiawatha  Lodge  F.  and  A.  M.,  jMount 
Vernon  Chapter  R.  A.  M.,  Bethlehem  Commandery  Knights 
Templar;  a  member  of  the  Phi  Beta  Kappa  Society  and  a  trustee 
of  Colgate  University. 

Surviving  him  were  his  wife,  four  children,  Arthur  L.,  Leonard 
R.,  Edith  A.  Granger  and  Mrs.  F.  E.  Vaughan  and  seven  grand- 
children. 

Ida  M.  Hayes,  daughter  of  the  late  Almon  and  Rebecca  A. 
Thomas  and  widow  of  L.  W.  Hayes,  died  at  her  home  No.  59 
Brinkerhoff  Street,  Plattsburgh,  N.  Y.,  October  14,  1920.  She 
was  bom  at  Plattsburgh  January  16,  1857  and  had  always  been  a 
resident  of  that  city.  The  only  survivors  of  her  immediate  family 
were  two  sisters,  Mrs.  W.  E.  Corey  of  Los  Angeles,  California, 
and  Mrs.  John  Harding  of  Burlington,  Vermont. 

Mrs.  Hayes  was  one  of  the  most  active  members  of  the  Red 
Cross  in  Plattsburgh  throughout  the  World  War.  She  was  also  a 
member  of  the  Clinton  County  Humane  Society,  the  Garden  Club 
of  Plattsburgh  and  the  Saranac  Chapter  of  the  Daughters  of  the 
American  Revolution.  She  had  for  years  been  prominent  in  the 
welfare  work  of  her  home  city. 

Aaron  Augustus  Healy,  bom  in  Brooklyn  June  26,  1850, 
son  of  Aaron  and  Elizabeth  Weston  Healy,  died  at  his  summer 
home  in  Cold  Spring-on-the-Hudson  September  28,  1921.  His 
first  wife  was  Elizabeth  Bradley,  of  Washington ;  his  second  wife 
was  Mary  Theodosia  Currier,  of  Oberlin,  Ohio.  The  latter  and 
his  son,  Henry  Vv^.  Healy,  of  Maplewood,  Nev/  Jersey,  survived 
him. 

He  was  educated  at  the  Brooldyn  Polytechnic  Institute.  In  1919 
he  received  the  degree  of  doctor  of  laws  from  Oberlin  College. 


OBITUARIES  253 

He  was  at  one  time  a  manufacturer  and  dealer  in  leather  under 
the  firm  name  of  A.  Healy  &  Sons,  New  York.  He  was  first 
vice-president  of  the  Central  Leather  Company  until  1910  and 
thereafter  continued  as  one  of  its  directors.  He  was  also  a  director 
of  the  Nassau  National  Bank  of  Brooklyn.  For  some  years 
before  his  death  he  had  not  been  actively  engaged  in  business. 

Mr.  Healy  was  an  Independent  Democrat  and  from  1893  to 
1897  was  collector  of  internal  revenue  for  the  eastern  district  of 
New  York. 

He  was  president  of  the  board  of  trustees  of  the  Brooklyn 
Institute  of  Arts  and  Sciences ;  a  director  of  the  Brooklyn  Academy 
of  Music;  a  member  of  the  Art  Commission  of  the  City  of  New 
York.  His  clubs  were  the  Rembrandt,  Century,  Hamilton, 
Reform,  City,  National  Arts. 

By  the  will  of  Mr.  Healy  $120,000  was  left  to  the  Brooklyn 
Academy  of  Arts  and  Sciences,  of  which  he  had  been  president  for 
twenty-five  years.  Of  this  bequest  $100,000  was  to  be  invested 
and  the  income  expended  in  the  purchase  of  works  of  art;  $20,000 
was  to  be  used  in  the  fiurtherance  of  work  in  the  botanical  and 
educational  departments  of  the  Institute.  The  Institute  re- 
ceived an  additional  bequest  of  twenty  paintings  to  be  selected 
by  it  from  Mr.  Healy's  private  collection.  Packer  Institute  re- 
ceived a  bequest  of  $5,000  for  its  endowment  fund. 

Robert  E.  Healey  after  several  years  of  failing  health  died 
September  20,  1920.  He  was  bom  in  Dannemora  in  1870;  was 
graduated  from  Plattsburgh  High  School  in  1884  and  from  Albany'- 
Law  School  two  years  later. 

After  admission  to  the  bar  he  practiced  law  in  Plattsburgh  in 
partnership  with  the  late  John  B.  Riley.  He  was  recorder  of  the 
village  of  Plattsburgh  and  as  such  held  a  position  corresponding 
to  that  of  city  judge  in  the  present  city  of  Plattsburgh.  He  was 
afterwards  city  attorney.  In  1903  he  was  appointed  county 
judge  of  Clinton  county  to  serve  for  the  unexpired  term  of  Henry 
T.  Kellogg  and  in  1908  was  elected  to  the  same  position.  When 
he  left  the  bench  he  became  attorney  and  counsel  of  the  county 
board  of  supervisors  and  continued  in  that  position  until  his  death. 

Judge  Healey  was  a  charter  member  of  Plattsburgh  Council, 
Knights  of  Colimibus,  a  fourth  degree  knight,  and  for  two  years 


254  OBITUARIES 

grand  knight  of  Plattsburgh  Council.  He  was  also  a  member  of 
the  Plattsburgh  Lodge  of  Elks  and  the  Plattsburgh  Tent,  Knights 
of  Maccabees.  He  was  a  member  of  the  Plattsburgh  Club  and 
Chamber  of  Commerce  and  at  one  time  a  member  of  the  city 
board  of  education. 

In  1897  he  married  Elizabeth  Burns.  She  and  their  two  chil- 
dren, Robert  Burns  and  Margaret  Elizabeth  Healy,  survived  him. 
Three  brothers  and  two  sisters,  Samuel  D.,  Albert  A.  and  John  H. 
Healey;  Mrs.  Louis  Ryan  and  Mrs.  Anna  McNeal,  also  stuvived 
him. 

Judge  Healey  was  a  lawyer  of  unusual  ability.  He  had  an  en- 
viable reputation  as  a  friend  of  the  poor  and  oppressed.  The 
Plattsburgh  Daily  Republican  said  in  its  obituary:  "No  client 
was  ever  turned  from  his  door  because  he  lacked  a  fee  for  the  con- 
duct of  his  legal  affairs." 

Fred  W.  Hewitt  died  at  Mary  McClellan  Hospital  in  Cam- 
bridge, Washington  County,  N.  Y.,  October  10,  1921,  at  the  age  of 
fifty-two. 

He  had  been  connected  with  the  banks  of  Granville,  Washington 
County,  for  thirty-four  years.  He  began  his  banking  career  in  the 
Granville  National  Bank,  where  through  steady  promotions  he 
became  cashier.  He  resigned  from  this  position  on  becoming 
president  of  the  Washington  County  Bank.  He  was  a  member 
also  of  E.  C.  Hewitt  &  Co.,  grocers  in  Granville. 

Mr.  Hewitt  had  been  president  of  the  village  of  Granville  for 
two  terms.  During  the  World  War  he  was  a  member  of  the  draft 
board  for  the  northern  district  of  Washington  County  and  his 
unremitting  work  as  a  member  of  this  board  is  believed  to  have 
caused  the  final  breakdown  of  his  health. 

He  was  a  past  master  of  the  Granville  Lodge  F.  &  A.  M.,  and 
belonged  to  several  higher  masonic  bodies.  He  was  an  active 
member  of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church  of  Granville. 

Surviving  him  were  his  wife,  who  was  Miss  Jennie  Powell  of 
Granville,  two  daughters,  Helen  and  Marion  Hewitt,  his  parents, 
Mr.  and  Mrs.  William  Hewitt,  and  one  brother,  E.  Clifford 
Hewitt. 

Gardner  C.  Leonard,  junior  member  of  the  firm  of  Cotrell 
and  Leonard,  fell  from  the  roof  of  the  firm's  building  at  472 


OBITUARIES  255 

Broadway,  Albany,  April  15,  1921,  and  was  instantly  killed. 
He  was  bom  in  West  Springfield,  Mass.,  Oct.  16,  1865.  He  was 
married  to  Grace  Watson  Sutherland,  Feb.  18,  1903.  His  wife, 
two  children,  Gardner  C.  jr.,  and  Margaret  S.,  and  three  sisters 
were  the  survivors  of  his  immediate  family. 

Mr.  Leonard  attended  the  Albany  Academy  from  1872  to  1882 
and  was  graduated  from  Williams  College  with  the  degree  of 
A.  B.  in  1887.  On  leaving  college  he  entered  the  employ  of 
Cotrell  and  Leonard  and  was  admitted  to  the  firm  in  1890.  The 
following  year  he  established  a  department  for  the  manufacture  of 
caps,  gowns  and  hoods  for  colleges  and  imiversities  under  the  name 
of  the  Intercollegiate  Bureau  of  Academic  Costtimes,  which  was 
chartered  by  the  University  of  the  State  of  New  York  in  1902. 
He  was  the  author  of  several  works  on  academic  costumes  and 
editor  of  "Songs  of  Williams,"  now  in  its  second  edition. 

Mr.  Leonard  was  a  member  of  the  Delta  Psi  and  Phi  Beta 
Kappa  fraternities;  of  Williams  College  Alumni  Association  of 
Eastern  New  York,  the  Sons  of  the  Revolution,  the  Society  of 
Colonial  Wars;  the  Albany  Institute;  Masters  Lodge  F.  8c  A.  M., 
the  Fort  Orange,  Albany,  Country,  University  clubs  of  Albany; 
the  Albany  Chamber  of  Commerce,  of  which  last  he  was  a  former 
vice-president.  He  was  one  of  the  seven  charter  members  of  the 
Albany  Rotary  Club,  which  had  planned  to  celebrate  the  eighth 
anniversary  of  its  foimdation  on  the  day  of  Mr.  Leonard's  death. 
Among  the  directorates  on  which  he  served  werethoseof  the  Albany 
Safe  Deposit  Company  and  the  Mutual  Fire  Insurance  Company. 
He  was  a  leading  member  of  the  State  Street  Presbyterian  Church 
of  Albany. 

Theodore  Garwood  Lewis  died  at  Buffalo,  N.  Y.,  November 
28,  1920.  Bom  at  Burlington,  Vt.,  December  14,  1836,  he  was  a 
son  of  John  and  Mary  Josselyn  Lewis.  The  family  moved  to 
Buffalo  in  1844.  Theodore  had  dim  recollections  of  the  trip  to 
Buffalo  on  board  a  canal  boat  over  the  old  Erie  Canal.  His 
father,  who  had  practiced  dentistry  in  Burlington,  continued  the 
practice  in  Biiffalo,  maintaining  his  office  in  the  latter  city  after  the 
family  had  moved  to  Bowonansville,  Erie  county,  N.  Y. 

After  attending  the  common  schools  of  Buffalo  Theodore  Lewis 
went  to  the  Pennsylvania  College  of  Dental  Siirgery,  from  which 


256  OBITUARIES 

he  was  graduated  with  the  degree  of  doctor  of  dental  surgery  in 
1862.  He  then  practiced  in  Bxiflalo  with  his  father  until  his  father 
retired,  and  thereafter  with  his  brother  Angelo. 

He  had  a  bent  towards  mechanics  inherited  from  his  father. 
In  1873  he  was  general  manager  of  the  International  Industrial 
Exhibition  given  in  Buffalo  under  the  direction  of  the  old  Mechanics 
Institute.  In  1865  at  meetings  of  the  Biiffalo  City  Dental  Associa- 
tion and  the  Western  New  York  Dental  Society  he  exhibited  the 
original  automatic  plugger.  Subsequently  Snow  and  Lewis 
began  its  manufacture.  Since  1867  its  manufacture  together  with 
that  of  the  other  Lewis  inventions  has  been  carried  on  by  the 
Buffalo  Dental  Mfg.  Co.,  of  which  he  was  president  since  1891. 
He  was  the  inventor  or  designer  of  many  dental  appliances.  The 
present  plant  and  equipment  of  the  Buffalo  Dental  Mfg.  Co.  are 
due  to  his  planning. 

While  living  at  Bowmansville  he  engaged  in  printing.  After 
he  had  begun  the  practice  of  dentistry  at  Buffalo  he  edited  num- 
erous pamphlets  under  the  pen  name  of  L.  Theo.  Garwood  and 
was  a  regular  contributor  to  the  Buffalo  newspapers.  For  twenty- 
two  years  he  edited  the  Dental  Advertiser,  afterwards  renamed 
the  Dental  Praciiioner  and  Advertiser. 

At  Bowmansville  he  also  taught  music.  After  he  had  estab- 
lished himself  in  Buffalo  he  maintained  an  amateur  orchestra 
which  he  conducted  in  his  home.  Once  or  twice  every  year  this 
orchestra  gave  a  concert  at  the  Buffalo  State  Hospital. 

He  had  collections  of  vases,  etchings  and  paintings,  war  medals 
and  decorations  of  honor,  oriental  rugs.  His  library  contained 
books  of  reference  relating  to  music  and  his  collections.  When  he 
retired  from  practice  to  assume  the  presidency  of  the  Buffalo 
Dental  Mfg.  Co.  he  gave  his  entire  professional  library  to  the 
Buffalo  Grosvenor  Reference  Library  and  every  year  afterwards 
gave  valuable  additions  to  it. 

Dr.  Lewis  was  survived  by  his  widow,  Catherine  M.  Lewis,  a 
son,  John  H.  Lewis,  a  daughter,  Mrs.  Alfred  V.  Ednie,  two  grand- 
children, and  a  brother,  James  V.  Lewis. 

William  Nottingham,  the  fourth  son  of  VanVleck  and  Abigail 
Maria  Williams  Nottingham,  was  bom  on  a  farm  some  three  miles 
from  the  city  of  Syracuse,  N.  Y.,  November  2,  1853.     He  died 


OBITUARIES  257 

in  that  city  January  23,  1921.  His  wife,  Eloise  Holden,  whom 
he  married  October  26,  1881,  daughter  of  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Erastus  F. 
Holden,  survived  him.  Mr.  Holden  had  large  business  interests 
in  Syracuse  and  was  one  of  the  principal  benefactors  of  Syracuse 
University. 

Mr.  Nottingham  attended  the  district  school  of  his  neighbor- 
hood, the  senior  grade  of  the  Syracuse  grammar  schools  and  the 
Syracuse  High  School,  from  which  he  was  graduated  in  1872. 
In  1876  he  was  graduated  from  Syracuse  University  with  the  degree 
of  B.  A.  His  attendance  upon  the  Syracuse  grammar  and  high 
schools  was  limited  to  the  fall  and  winter  terms.  During  the 
summer  terms  he  worked  on  the  home  farm  and  remained  there 
until  graduation  from  college.  In  college  he  was  regarded  as  one 
of  the  best  classical  and  all-round  students. 

In  the  fall  of  1876  Mr.  Nottingham  began  the  study  of  law  in 
the  office  of  William  P.  Goodelle,  a  prominent  lawyer  of  Syracuse. 
At  the  same  time  Mr.  Nottingham  pursued  post-graduate  studies 
in  Syracuse  University,  from  which  on  examination  in  chemistry 
he  received  his  M.  A.  degree  in  1877,  and  on  examination  in 
political  economy,  his  Ph.  D.  degree  in  1878.  He  was  a  trustee  of 
Syracuse  University  by  election  of  the  alimmi  association  from 
1892  to  1902.  His  election  in  the  latter  year  to  the  Board  of 
Regents  of  the  University  of  the  State  of  New  York,  of  which  he 
was  a  member  until  1915,  compelled  his  retirement  as  trustee  of 
the  University.  From  1895  to  1903  he  lectured  on  corporations 
in  the  Law  School  of  Syracuse  University,  and  in  1903  the  Uni- 
versity gave  him  the  degree  of  LL.  D. 

From  his  admission  to  the  bar  as  attorney  and  counselor  in 
1879  until  his  death  Mr.  Nottingham  practiced  law  in  Syracuse. 
He  was  successively  a  member  of  the  firms  of  Goodelle  and  Notting- 
ham ;  Goodelle,  Nottingham  Brothers  and  Andrews ;  Nottingham 
and  Nottingham;  Nottingham,  Nottingham  and  Edgcomb.  He 
was  a  gifted  speaker  as  well  as  a  studious  lawyer,  equally  success- 
ful before  judges  and  juries,  and  one  of  the  leading  law^'-ers  of  the 
state  in  general  practice.  He  was  president  of  the  Onondaga 
County  Bar  Association  in  1911,  and  of  the  New  York  State 
Bar  Association  in  1912-1913. 

He  organized  the  Syracuse  Trust  Co.    and  was  its  attorney; 


258  OBITUARIES 

was  director  and  attorney  of  Empire  State  Railroad  Corpora- 
tion, New  York  Telephone  Co.,  and  Dyneto  Electric  Co. 

He  was  a  member  of  the  Delta  Kappa  Epsilon  and  Phi  Beta 
Kappa  fraternities.  His  clubs  were  the  Pilgrims'  of  London,  the 
Citizens'  and  University  of  Syracuse,  the  Recess  of  New  York. 
From  boyhood  he  was  a  member  of  the  First  Methodist  Episcopal 
Church  of  Syracuse  and  was  one  of  the  most  active  and  liberal 
of  its  membership.  He  attended  two  quadrennial  general  con- 
ferences of  the  Methodist  Episcopal  Church  as  a  delegate  from 
his  local  annual  conference. 

Silas  H.  Paine  died  at  Silver  Bay,  Lake  George,  April  11, 
1921.  He  would  have  been  seventy-nine  years  old  had  he  lived 
until  the  29th  of  the  month.  His  wife  was  the  only  survivor. 
Their  only  son,  Harrington  S.  Paine,  died  three  years  before  his 
father. 

Mr.  Paine  was  bom  at  Holbrook,  Mass.,  and  at  the  age  of 
twelve  left  school  and  went  to  work.  He  engaged  in  business  in 
Pittsbtu-g,  Pa.,  where  he  accimiulated  a  small  amoimt  of  capital 
and  became  interested  in  the  oil  business,  which  was  then  in  its 
infancy.  He  established  several  oil  wells  and  then  took  up  re- 
fining at  Oil  City.  His  business  was  one  of  those  taken  over  by 
the  Standard  Oil  Company  when  the  latter  was  founded.  In 
1879  he  went  to  Cleveland,  Ohio,  where  he  was  associated  with 
John  D.  Rockefeller  until  1884,  when  he  went  to  New  York  and 
became  head  of  the  company's  lubricating  oil  and  candle  de- 
partment. 

Eighteen  years  before  his  death  Mr.  Paine  aided  in  founding 
the  Silver  Bay  Association,  to  which  he  sold  its  property  for 
about  one-half  its  value,  and  of  which  he  was  a  trustee.  In 
memory  of  his  son  he  gave  the  association  $100,000  to  found  the 
Silver  Bay  School  for  Boys.  He  gave  much  money  to  educational 
and  religious  work. 

When  he  left  home  at  the  age  of  twelve  his  mother  gave  him  a 
small  piece  of  paper  on  which  she  had  written  "Thou,  God,  seest 
me."  This  paper  remained  in  his  possession  up  to  the  time  of  his 
death.  He  always  kept  it  before  him  on  his  desk  while  in  his 
office  or  in  pocket  while  traveling.  During  a  flood  in  the  oil 
countr>^  in  which  he  lost  $50,000,  the  paper  disappeared,  but  it 


OBITUARIES  259 

was  found  by  workmen  while  cleaning  mud  from  his  office  floor 
and  restored   to  him. 

John  Jay  Ryan,  who  died  February  18,  1921,  was  a  man  to 
whom  the  conquest  of  adversity  was  a  habit.  He  was  bom  Nov. 
14,  1857,  at  Medina,  New  York,  and  was  a  son  of  Patrick  and 
Mary  Lahey  Ryan.  Shortly  thereafter  his  family  moved  to  a  farm 
in  Ridgeway,  New  York.  Both  of  his  parents  died  before  John 
had  reached  his  ninth  birthday. 

For  five  years  he  lived  with  a  priest  at  Medina,  Lockport  and 
Buffalo  as  errand  boy  and  acolyte ;  then  again  on  a  farm  in  Ridge- 
way. Befriended  and  encouraged  by  Mr.  and  Mrs.  John  Ludlum 
he  attended  Yates  Academy  from  1873  to  1876.  He  then  went 
to  the  Ionia  (Michigan)  High  School,  where  he  finished  his  prep- 
aration for  college  in  1877.  After  a  year  at  Rochester  Univer- 
sity he  entered  the  law  department  of  Michigan  University  and 
was  graduated  in  1883. 

Having  been  admitted  to  the  bar  of  Michigan  in  1882,  he  began 
his  practice  in  Muskegon,  Michigan.  He  returned  to  Medina  in 
the  autumn  of  1883,  was  admitted  to  the  bar  of  New  York,  taught 
school  for  another  year  at  Shelby  Center,  opened  an  office  in  Me- 
dina in  1884,  and  there  continued  the  practice  of  law  until  his  death. 
He  was  admitted  to  practice  in  the  federal  courts  and  argued  cases 
in  the  Supreme  Court  of  the  United  States.  He  was  a  member 
of  the  Orleans  County  Bar  Association,  the  New  York  State  Bar 
Association  and  the  American  Bar  Association. 

Mr.  Ryan  served  as  member  of  the  board  of  education  and  board 
of  trustees  of  the  village  of  Medina  and  as  village  attorney.  He 
was  a  prime  mover  in  securing  the  municipal  water  system  of 
Medina,  the  electric  lighting  of  its  streets  and  the  purchase  of  ade- 
quate street  making  machiner\\  He  organized  the  Medina  Quarry 
Co.,  an  amalgamation  of  all  the  quarries  of  Orleans  County,  and 
the  Medina  Athletic  Association.  He  had  an  exceptional  ac- 
quaintance with  the  water  and  mill  rights  of  all  the  surrounding 
region.  No  one  was  better  informed  on  the  histor}^  of  Medina. 
In  politics  he  was  a  Democrat.  He  was  a  delegate  to  the  national 
convention  of  his  party  in  1904.  He  supported  prohibition  and 
women's  suffrage.  He  was  an  Odd  Fellow  and  a  member  of  the 
Alert  Club  of  Medina.     During  the  World  War  Mr.  Ryan  organ- 


260  OBITUARIES 

ized  a  bureau  of  four  minute  men  and  delivered  many  addresses 
in  western  New  York. 

Mr.  Ryan  was  married  to  Alberta  Davis  in  1887.  They  had 
four  children,  all  of  whom  and  his  wife  survive  him. 

Harriot  Hyde  Sexton  died  at  her  home  in  Palmyra,  N.  Y., 
November  22,  1921,  at  the  age  of  eighty-two.  Her  paternal 
grandfather,  Rev.  Alvan  Hyde,  D.  D.,  was  a  noted  Presbyterian 
divine  and  educator.  He  had  a  part  in  the  upbuilding  and  manage- 
ment of  Williams  College  and  maintained  a  private  family  school 
for  boys.  Her  parents  were  Stephen  and  Laura  Eliza  Leonard 
Hyde,  who  shortly  after  their  marriage  went  from  Massachusetts 
to  the  then  far  western  village  of  Palmyra.  She  was  one  of  seven 
children.  One  of  the  seven,  Stephen  Hyde  of  Kansas,  survived 
her. 

In  1860  she  married  Pliny  Titus  Sexton,  the  lawyer,  banker, 
Regent,  Vice-Chancellor  and  Chancellor  of  the  University  of  the 
State  of  New  York.  They  were  playmates  in  childhood  and 
were  inseparable  companions  during  the  sixty  years  of  their 
married  life.  Throughout  the  great  feebleness  of  her  last  years 
her  husband  devoted  himself  unreservedly  to  her  care  and  com- 
fort. 

Mrs.  Sexton  was  buried  in  the  5^ard  of  her  home,  there  to  re- 
main until  after  her  husband's  death,  when  both  are  to  be  buried 
in  their  cemetery  lot  in  one  grave. 

William  G.  Schermerhorn,  son  of  Nicholas  I.  and  Susan 
Chism  Schermerhorn  and  a  descendent  of  one  of  the  original  Dutch 
families  of  Schenectady,  died  March  25,  1921.  He  was  born  in 
185L 

He  was  educated  in  the  public  schools  and  afterwards  was  as- 
sociated with  his  father  in  conducting  a  coal,  hay  and  straw  store 
on  Dock  Street  in  Schenectady.  He  then  entered  the  employ  of 
the  old  Schenectady  bank  where  he  was  teller  and  cashier.  In 
1885  he  resigned  and  from  that  time  until  his  last  illness  he  was 
one  of  the  most  influential  banlcers  and  business  men  of  Schenectady. 
He  was  connected  with  the  Schenectady  Trust  Co.,  from 
which  he  resigned  in  1905  to  take  part  in  organizing  the  Citizens' 
Trust  Company.     He  was  one  of  those  instnmiental  in  bringing 


OBITUARIES  261 

the  General  Electric  Company  to  Schenectady  and  in  enabling  it 
to  obtain  a  suitable  site. 

Mr.  Schermerhom  was  a  member  of  the  Mohawk  Club  and  the 
Mohawk  Golf  Club;  president  of  the  Vale  Cemetery  Association; 
trustee  of  the  Children's  Home,  the  Young  Woman's  Christian 
Association,  and  the  Old  Ladies'  Home. 

In  1870  he  married  Sarah  L.  Swart.  She  died  some  eight  years 
before  him.     A  son,  Nicholas  Irving,  survived  him. 

Caroline  Elizabeth  Shepherd  was  the  daughter  of  James 
Hill  Shepherd  and  Frances  Robinson  Shepherd.  She  was  bom  in 
Fort  Miller,  Washington  county.  New  York,  and  lived  there  nearly 
all  her  life.  She  died  at  the  Samaritan  Hospital,  Troy,  May  29, 
1920,  after  an  illness  of  several  months.  Her  mother,  two  sisters, 
Mrs.  D.  J.  DeGarmo  of  Stillwater,  Miss  Bell  M.  Shepherd  of  Fort 
Miller,  and  one  brother,  Samuel  J.  Shepherd  of  Fort  Miller  were 
the  survivors  of  her  immediate  family. 

Miss  Shepherd  was  a  graduate  of  the  Schuylerville  High  School 
and  the  Albany  Normal  School  (now  the  State  College  for  Teach- 
ers) and  was  an  honor  student  at  graduation  from  the  latter 
institution.  Her  associates  and  teachers  in  the  normal  school 
regarded  her  as  a  teacher  of  remarkable  promise.  In  order  to 
be  with  her  mother  Miss  Shepherd  disregarded  opportunities  for 
teaching  commensurate  with  her  abilities  and  accepted  such 
employment  as  was  available  in  schools  near  her  home. 

The  following  appreciation  was  written  by  Mrs.  Earl  Hayner 
of  Stillwater  and  is  here  included  in  accordance  with  the  wishes  of 
Miss  Shepherd's  niece.  Miss  Catherine  N.  Pettit: 

"She  was  possessed  of  an  unusually  brilliant  mind,  a  marked  ex- 
ecutive ability,  no  inconsiderable  musical  ability  and  a  sense  of 
humor  keen  but  kindly ;  she  had  an  especially  happy  manner  with 
young  people  to  which  the  respect  and  affection  of  a  host  of  former 
pupils  attest. 

"As  a  lifelong  member  of  the  Reformed  Church  of  Fort  Miller, 
Miss  Shepherd  served  faithfully  as  organist  and  choir  leader,  and 
as  a  constant  helper  and  advisor  in  all  the  church  activities,  es- 
pecially in  the  training  of  children  in  the  Sunday  school. 

"In  the  passing  of  Miss  Shepherd  the  community  has  suffered 
an  irreparable  loss,  but  the  memon^  of  a  devoted  Christian  life  re- 


262  OBITUARIES 

plete  with  good  works,  hands  and  mind  swift  and  beautiful  for 
duty  as  long  as  strength  held,  in  home,  church, school  and  wherever 
there  was  a  task  to  be  done — this  memory  will  be  an  especial 
influence  in  the  lives  of  all  who  knew  her." 

Ida  Remington  Squire  died  on  February  28,  1921.  Mrs. 
Squire  was  a  daughter  of  Philo  and  Caroline  Remington.  She 
was  bom  Novenber  20,  1842,  in  the  old  Remington  house  in  Ilion. 
On  December  23,  1868,  she  was  married  to  Watson  Carvosso 
Squire.  Her  husband  was  manager  of  the  Remington  Arms 
Company  from  1866  to  1879,  when  they  moved  to  Seattle.  He 
was  governor  of  Washington  Territory  1884-1887,  and  afterwards 
United  States  senator  from  Washington  for  two  terms.  The  last 
years  of  her  life  she  lived  in  Ilion  in  the  mansion  built  by  her 
father  on  Armory  Hill,  in  which  she  died  and  from  which  she  was 
borne  to  her  grave  in  Armory  Hill  Cemetery.  Her  husband,  two 
daughters,  and  two  sons,  survive  her. 

She  was  one  of  the  Daughters  of  the  American  Revolution  and 
the  Daughters  of  1812;  a  member  of  the  Women's  Foreign  and 
Home  Missionary  Societies  of  the  Methodist  Church  and  the 
Women's  Christian  Temperance  Union.  Her  beneficent  activities 
were  not  confined  to  the  societies  and  church  in  which  she  held 
membership.  It  was  in  keeping  with  the  practice  of  a  lifetime 
that  she  was  preparing  to  attend  a  social  gathering  to  aid  the 
fatherless  children  of  France  when  she  received  the  paralytic  stroke 
from  which  she  died. 

Irving  Goodwin  Vann  died  at  his  home  in  S3Tacuse,  March  22, 
1921.  He  was  a  son  of  Samuel  R.  and  Catherine  Goodwin  Vann 
and  was  bom  Jan.  3,  1842,  in  Ulysses,  Tompkins  county.  New 
York.  In  1870  he  was  married  to  Florence,  daughter  of  Henry  A. 
Dillaye  of  Syracuse,  N.  Y.  His  wife,  a  son,  and  a  daughter, 
survive  him. 

He  was  graduated  from  Yale  College  with  the  degree  of  A.  B. 
in  1863,  and  from  Albany  Law  School  with  the  degree  of  LL.  B. 
in  1865.  The  degree  of  A.  M.  was  conferred  upon  him  by  Yale  in 
1870;  that  of  LL.D.  by  Hamilton  in  1882;  Syracuse  in  1897, 
Yale  in  1898. 

He  began  the  practice  of  law  in  Syracuse  in  1865.  He  was 
active  in  several  political  campaigns  as  a  Republican.     In  1872 


OBITUARIES  263 

as  a  Liberal  Republican  he  supported  Horace  Greeley.  In  1879 
he  was  elected  mayor  of  Syracuse  by  a  plurality  of  more  than  a 
thousand.  Under  his  administration  S5^acuse  had  lower  taxes 
than  it  had  had  for  many  years.  Mr.  Vann  at  the  end  of  his  term 
declined  renomination  and  again  devoted  himself  to  the  practice 
of  law. 

From  1882  to  1896  he  was  one  of  the  justices  of  the  Supreme 
Court  of  the  State  of  New  York.  Governor  Morton  appointed 
him  judge  of  the  Court  of  Appeals  in  1896  and  in  November  of 
that  year  he  was  elected  to  that  office  for  the  full  term  of  fourteen 
years.  In  1910  he  was  reelected  and  served  until  Jan.  1,  1913, 
when  he  was  retired  because  of  the  constitutional  age  limit. 
He  was  a  lecturer  in  the  Albany,  Cornell  and  Syracuse  law  schools. 
He  was  one  of  the  founders  of  the  Onondaga  Bar  Association  and 
the  New  York  State  Bar  Association. 

The  Woodlawn  cemetery  was  opened  through  the  efforts  of 
Judge  Vann  and  he  was  its  president  for  years.  He  was  presi- 
dent of  the  Onondaga  Red  Cross  from  its  organization.  He  was  a 
founder  and  trustee  of  the  Syracuse  Museum  of  Fine  Arts;  a 
founder  and  president  of  the  Century  Club  of  Syracuse,  the  Yale 
Club  of  Syracuse,  the  Alimmi  Association  of  Albany  Law  School ; 
a  member  of  the  Citizens  Club  of  Syracuse,  the  Fort  Orange 
Club  of  Albany,  the  University  Club  of  Central  New  York,  the 
Onondaga  Historical  Society,  the  Albany  Historical  Society  and 
nearly  all  the  charitable  organizations  of  Syracuse. 

Judge  Vann  had  a  library  of  more  than  10,000  volimies  and  a 
collection  of  nearly  200  firearms  selected  to  mark  the  progress  of 
invention.  His  active  recreations  were  riding,  hunting  and 
fishing. 

Charles  Spencer  Williams  died  at  his  home  in  Hudson,  N.  Y., 
January  20,  1922,  where  he  was  superintendent  of  the  schools  of 
the  city.  He  had  formerly  been  principal  of  schools  at  Hilton, 
Livonia,  Groton  and  Chatham,  all  in  the  state  of  New  York. 

Mr.  Williams  received  his  education  at  Brockport  State  Normal 
School  and  Cornell  University  and  held  the  degree  of  bachelor  of 
arts. 

His  parents  were  William  B.  and  Ella  I.  Coleman  Williams. 
He  was  bom  in  Greene,  Monroe  County,  N.  Y.,  March  30,  1870. 


264  OBITUARIES 

In  1893  he  married  Ella  E.  Hoj^t.  They  had  two  daughters, 
Jessie  and  Alice.     His  wife  and  daughters  survived  him. 

Mr.  Williams  was  a  member  of  Phi  Beta  Kappa  and  of  several 
Masonic  and  other  fraternal  organizations. 

The  Hudson  Evening  Register  of  January  21,  1922,  said  in 
part: 

"The  general  gloom,  the  cloud  of  witnesses,  attest  the  apprecia- 
tion of  a  man  who,  in  passing  leaves  an  imprint  on  the  city  and  on 
the  minds  and  hearts  of  its  entire  population  that  will  be  in- 
effaceable. 

We  might  recite  a  thousand  instances  of  his  service,  generally, 
in  and  for  the  community,  for  individuals,  homes,  clubs,  lodges, 
organizations,  in  need  of  the  touch  that  himianizes  and  uplifts; 
and  never  were  any  of  these  disappointed,  and  all  were  the  better 
for  the  service  ungrudgingly  given." 

Abbe  Ann  Wright 
and 
Elizabeth  Baker  Wright  Denton 

Abbe  Ann  Wright  died  October  2,  1921,  at  the  age  of  eighty- 
two. 

She  was  a  daughter  of  Major  James  Wright  and  Charity  Tillman 
Baker  Wright.  Her  maternal  great  grandfather,  Albert  Baker, 
came  from  Westchester  County,  New  York,  in  1765,  was  the  second 
settler  in  Sandy  Hill  and  built  the  first  house  in  the  settlement. 
Sandy  Hill,  renamed  Hudson  Falls  in  1910,  lies  in  the  south  west 
comer  of  Kingsbury,  a  town  erected  by  patent  royal  granted  in 
1762  to  James  Bradshaw  of  Connecticut,  the  first  settler  in  Sandy 
Hill,  and  twenty-two  associates.  Albert  Baker  took  a  tract  of 
six  hundred  acres  near  the  falls  in  the  Hudson  River  at  Sandy 
Hill  which  have  since  been  known  as  Baker's  Falls,  where  he 
built  the  first  saw  mill  and  grist  mill  in  the  town.  Miss  Wright's 
great  uncle  Caleb  Baker  was  the  first  white  child  bom  in  the  town 
of  Kingsbury. 

In  October  of  1780  Major  Carleton  of  the  British  army  swept 
Kingsbury  with  fire  and  sword.  There  were  seventeen  families 
living  in  the  town  at  the  time  of  this  raid;  all  were  forced  to  flee 
and  every  house  except  two  was  burned.  -\  Ibert  Baker  was  then 
absent  from  home.     His  sons  Albert  and  Charles,  warned  by  a 


OBITUARIES  265 

neighbor  and  seeing  smoke  in  the  direction  of  Kingsbury  Street, 
some  four  miles  to  the  north,  yoked  their  two  pairs  of  oxen  and 
hurriedly  placing  the  rest  of  the  family  with  whatever  household 
belongings  were  most  convenient  into  carts  hastened  to  Fort 
Edward.  Next  year  Albert  Baker  and  most  of  the  other  refugees 
returned  and  with  them  were  many  new  settlers. 

In  1821  Miss  Wright's  father  established  the  Sandy  Hill  Herald 
a  weekly  newspaper  still  published,  and  edited  it  for  twenty 
years.  Silas  Wright,  formerly  governor  of  New  York,  was  a 
cousin  of  Miss  Wright. 

For  twenty-five  years  Miss  Wright  was  a  teacher  and  later 
assistant  principal  in  one  of  the  grammar  schools  of  New  York 
City.  Among  the  prominent  men  v/ho  were  her  pupils  are  Dr. 
William  L.  Ettinger,  superintendent  of  the  public  schools  of  New 
York  City,  and  Major  General  Thomas  Henry  Barry,  superintend- 
ent of  the  U.  S.  Military  Academy  at  West  Point  from  1910  to 
1912,  whom  she  tutored  while  he  was  preparing  for  admission  to 
the  Academy  in  1873. 

Elizabeth  Baker  Wright  Denton  died  February  11,  1922,  at 
the  age  of  eighty-four.     She  was  a  sister  of  Abbe  Ann  Wright. 

Less  than  a  year  before  the  War  between  the  States  she  married 
Benjamin  F.  Denton.  He  enlisted  as  a  Union  soldier  at  the  out- 
break of  the  war.  Mrs.  Denton  went  south  with  him  as  a  nurse 
and  remained  throughout  the  war.  He  was  killed  at  the  assault  on 
Port  Hudson  and  his  wife  brought  his  body  to  Sandy  Hill  for 
burial. 

For  thirty-five  years  Mrs.  Denton  taught  in  the  public  schools 
of  New  York  City,  during  twenty-five  of  w^hich  she  was  principal 
of  a  grammar  school. 

Miss  Wright  and  Mrs.  Denton  retired  from  teaching  some 
twenty  years  ago,  the  retirement  of  Mrs.  Denton  preceding  that  of 
Miss  Wright  by  a  short  interval.  They  then  made  their  home  in 
the  Baker-Wright  homestead  at  50  Main  Street,  Sandy  Hill 
(now  Hudson  Falls),  a  roomy  brick  house  built  in  1810  and  stand- 
ing in  spacious  grounds  which  are  a  part  of  the  lands  taken  by 
their  great  grandfather  Albert  Baker. 

Until  advancing  years  shut  them  in  the  two  sisters  were  active 
in  the  civic,  patriotic  and  religious  life  of  the  community.     They 


266  OBITUARIES 

were  members  of  the  Woman's  Relief  Corps  and  Mrs.  Denton 
was  its  president  for  a  long  time.  During  her  presidency  she 
caused  a  handsome  flag  staif  to  be  erected  in  the  village  park  near 
the  soldiers'  monument.  She  was  a  member  of  Crown  Star 
Chapter  O.  E.  S.  Miss  Wright  was  a  member  of  Hudson  Falls 
Chapter  O.  E.  S.,  a  past  matron  O.  E.  S.  and  grand  representative 
O.  E.  S.  of  the  State  of  Arkansas. 


REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS 

Minutes  of  the  Court  of  Fort  Orange  and  Beverwyck,  1652-1656. 
Translated  and  edited  by  A.  J.  F.  van  Laer.  (Albany:  The 
University  of  the  State  of  New  York.  1920.  Vol.  I.,  Pp.  326. 
Index  and  illustrations.) 

In  giving  us  this  translation  from  the  Dutch  of  these  court 
minutes  Mr.  van  Laer  has  rendered  a  valuable  service  to  historical 
scholarship.  There  are  few  of  our  teachers  and  historians  who  use 
Dutch  with  facility  and  there  are  still  fewer  who  are  capable  of 
deciphering  the  manuscripts  written  in  difficult  seventeenth  cen- 
tury hands. 

These  coiirt  minutes  are  far  from  dry  reading.  Aside  from  a 
knowledge  of  the  processes  of  justice  and  court  procedure  which 
they  give,  there  is  to  be  foiind  in  them  a  very  good  picture  of  Dutch 
culture  and  civilization  in  America  in  the  middle  of  the  seventeenth 
century. 

The  investigator  will  find  here  material  for  studies  of  the  oc- 
cupations, professions,  trades  and  trade  guilds  of  the  people;  of 
trade  with  the  Indians;  of  the  liquor  traffic;  of  money  and  ex- 
change; of  the  comparative  status  of  the  various  members  of  the 
community  from  the  point  of  view  of  wealth ;  of  forts,  buildings, 
and  fire-prevention;  of  common  offences  and  punishments;  of  the 
care  of  the  poor ;  of  sports  and  amusements ;  of  Sunday  observance 
and  of  social  conditions  generally.  In  fact  it  is  a  veritable  Domes- 
day Book  for  the  little  community  which  centered  aroimd  Fort 
Orange  and  the  Village  of  Beverwyck,  which  subsequently  be- 
came the  City  of  Albany. 

J.S. 

The  Record  of  a  Private.  [By  Cassius  P.  Byington.]  East 
Aurora,  N.  Y. :  The  Roycrofters.     [1922  ?J  Pp.  113.     Illustrations. 

This  unique  volume  opens  with  the  story  of  the  author's  son, 
Russell  Perkins  Byington,  (Co.  I,  105th  Inf.  27th  Div.,  U.  S.  Army, 
American  Expeditionary  Forces)  who  was  killed  in  action  in 
France  on  September  29,  1918.  It  is  a  remarkable  tribute  of  a 
father  to  a  dead  son.     It  traces  the  latter's  career  through  his 

267 


268  REVIEWS  OF  BOOKS 

boyhood  and  youth,  takes  the  reader  through  the  young  man's 
services  on  the  Mexican  Border,  and  in  the  World  War  in  which 
he  won  the  Distinguished  Service  Cross. 

The  most  effective  portions  of  the  volxmie  are  the  cheerful  letters 
which  Russell  sent  back  home  from  the  front.  These,  taken  with 
letters  about  him  from  his  comrades  in  arms  serve  to  show  Ameri- 
can young  manhood  at  its  best. 

There  are,  in  addition,  the  World  War  records  of  the  other 
members  of  the  family  and  its  collateral  branches,  and  a  history 
of  the  family  and  its  part  in  the  Colonial,  Revolutionary,  1812, 
Civil  and  Spanish  American  Wars. 

J.  S. 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

PERSONAL 

Mrs.  Seaman  Miller  held  a  meeting  at  her  home  in  Linlithgo, 
August  29,  1922,  to  promote  the  movement  for  a  "House  of  His- 
tory" in  Columbia  County."  Mrs.  Pirie  MacDonald  made  a  re- 
port in  which  she  stated  that  some  thirty  counties  in  New  York 
State  had  some  buildings,  or  part  of  a  building  for  their  historical 
societies. 

Mrs.  John  G.  Wickser  of  Buffalo  wrote  the  pageant  which  was 
staged  at  the  Buffalo  Normal  School,  June  27,  1922,  giving  a  his- 
tory of  the  school. 

A  committee  of  which  Philip  T.  H.  Pierson  is  Chairman  has  been 
organized  in  Bennington,  Vermont,  to  make  arrangements  for  a 
movement  to  celebrate  the  150th  anniversary  of  the  Battle  of 
Bennington  which  comes  in  1927. 

Jefferson  D.  Davis  of  Fort  Miller  has  made  and  is  making  an 
extensive  collection  of  books,  journals  and  diaries  relative  to  that 
vicinity  and  to  Saratoga. 

HISTORICAL   SOCIETIES   AND    CLUBS 

The  Recreational  and  Improvement  Association  of  Homell  gave 
a  historical  pageant  there  on  July  4,  1922.  Indians  from  neighbor- 
ing reservations  participated. 

The  Mohawk  Valley  Historic  Association  has  appointed  a  Com- 
mittee to  examine  the  history  text  books  used  in  the  schools. 
At  its  meeting  at  the  Herkimer  Homestead  on  August  5,  1922, 
it  also  urged  the  establishment  of  the  Oriskany  Battlefield  as  a 
national  park. 

On  August  3,  1922,  the  Wyoming  County  Historical  Association 
held  its  meeting  at  Silver  Lake.     Senator  Wadsworth  spoke. 

The  Oriskany  Chapter  of  the  Daughters  of  the  American  Revo- 
lution on  August  7,  1922,  held  commemoration  exercises  at  the 
Oriskany  Monument  in  honor  of  the  145th  anniversary  of  the  battle. 
Rev.  George  C.  Frost  of  Oriskany  delivered  the  address. 

269 


270  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

At  the  State  Experiment  Station  in  Geneva  there  was  given  on 
August  26,  1922,  a  pageant  covering  the  early  history  of  Ontario 
County.  A  prologue  and  four  episodes  were  staged  by  seventy- 
five  persons. 

Mrs.  Edwin  Paddock  of  Watertown  has  bequeathed  her  home 
in  Watertown  to  the  Jefferson  Historical  Society  to  be  used  as  a 
historical  museum.  The  society  is  also  to  receive  about  $40,000 
as  residuary  legatee.  W.  H.  Stevens  is  to  name  a  committee  to 
consider  ways  and  means. 

The  Dutchess  County  Historical  Society  held  its  annual  his- 
torical pilgrimage  on  September  16,  1922.  This  time  the  members 
went  into  Putnam  County  to  visit  the  site  of  Continental  Village 
where  American  troops  had  their  quarters  during  the  Revolution. 

The  most  elaborate  pageant  held  in  New  York  State  in  recent 
years  was  staged  at  Johnstown  September  8,  1922,  to  commemo- 
rate the  150th  anniversary  of  the  founding  of  Tryon  County. 
Many  members  of  the  Johnstown  Historical  Society  participated 
and  the  pageant  was  very  successfully  handled,  particularly  in 
the  matter  of  the  wise  provision  for  the  prevention  of  congestion 
at  any  one  place. 

On  September  22,  1922,  there  was  an  exhibition  of  paintings  by 
James  Long  Scudder  of  Huntington  (1836-1881)  given  in  the  new 
library  of  the  Huntington  Historical  Society.  Other  newly  ac- 
quired material  of  historic  interest  was  exhibited. 

The  Owasco  Chapter  of  the  D.  A.  R.  at  Auburn,  on  September 
16,  1922,  had  a  celebration  in  honor  of  the  135th  anniversary  of 
the  adoption  of  the  Federal  Constitution  (September  17,  1778). 

PUBLICATIONS,    BOOKS,    ARTICLES,    MANUSCRIPTS 

The  Geneva  Times  for  June  13,  1922,  has  an  article  on  the  "His- 
tory of  Hobart  College"  by  Professor  M.  H.  Turk. 

In  the  Elmira  Gazette  for  July  1,  1922  there  is  an  article  on  the 
early  history  of  the  schools  of  Elmira  by  Mary  A.  Potter. 

The  Fort  Plain  Free  Press  in  its  issue  July  12,  1922,  carries  an 
article  by  Ida  C.  Keller,  which  contains  an  article  written  by  her 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  271 

father,  John  H.  Keller,  on  the  "History  of  Old  Ford's  Bush  Back 
to  1830." 

The  New  York  Times  for  July  2,  1922,  has  an  article  by  John 
W.  Harrington  entitled  "Fort  Ticonderoga's  International  Ghost 
Story." 

The  Daily  Saratogian  for  August  15,  1922,  carries  an  article  on 
the  history  of  the  pubic  schools  of  Mechanicville. 

The  Rome  Sentinel  for  August  26,  1922,  has  articles  on  the 
Mohawk  Highway  and  on  the  South  James  Street  Road  in  Rome. 

The  Knickerbocker  Press  for  September  17,  1922,  carries  an 
article  on  the  "Old  Revolutionary  Fort  at  Middleburg." 

The  Knickerbocker  Press  for  September  3,  1922,  has  an  article 
on  "Early  Penalties  or  Punishments  for  Crime." 

The  Gloversville  Herald  for  September  8,  1922,  carries  extensive 
articles  entitled  "Historical  Facts  Relative  to  Tryon  Coimty." 
This  issue  of  the  paper  is  a  very  large  anniversary  nimiber  published 
to  commemorate  the  150th  anniversary  of  the  establishment  of 
Tryon  Cotmty.  It  is  handsomely  illustrated  and  contains  an  ac- 
coimt  of  the  pageant  staged  for  the  occasion. 

The  fiftieth  anniversary  of  the  Cohoes  High  School  was  cele- 
brated June  29, 1922.  The  history  of  the  school  was  covered  in  the 
addresses  given  and  these  were  published  in  the  Cohoes  American 
for  June  30,  1922. 

The  New  York  Times  for  July  2,  1922,  carries  an  article  on  the 
celebrated  picture  known  as  "The  Spirit  of  76,"  which  in  a  fashion 
somewhat  similar  to  the  song  of  "Yankee  Doodle"  had  its  origin 
in  a  burlesque  or  comic  sketch. 

The  Knickerbocker  Press  of  Albany  in  its  issue  of  August  6,  1922, 
carries  an  article  on  the  "Fort  Crailo"  house  in  Rensselaer  and  the 
song  of  "Yankee  Doodle"  said  to  have  been  written  there. 

The  Schuyler  Mansion  at  Albany  has  been  presented  by  Miss 
Louisa  Lee  Schuyler  and  Miss  Georgine  Schuyler  of  New  York 
with  several  letters  among  which  are  some  written  by  Washington, 
Franklin,  Jay  and  Hamilton. 

The  Knickerbocker  Press  for  August  20,  1922,  has  an  illustrated 
article  on  the  old  "Glen  Sanders  Mansion  at  Scotia." 


272  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

The  Edison  Monthly  for  July  1922  carries  an  interesting  article 
on  New  York  City  in  the  early  eighties  under  the  title  of  "Do 
You  Remember  When." 

The  Vineland  Historical  Magazine  for  July  1922,  has  an  article 
on  "Jacob  James  Schoonmaker"  of  New  York. 

In  the  Saturday  Evening  Post  for  June  24,  1922,  is  an  article  by 
George  F.  Parker  entitled  "Grover  Cleveland  as  Governor  of  New 
York." 

Houghton  MifHin  Company  has  published  a  new  edition  of 
Abbott's  "Roosevelt  in  the  Bad  Lands." 

The  New  York  Historical  Society  Quarterly  Bulletin  for  July, 
1922,  has  an  article  by  Reginald  Pelham  Bolton  on  "The  Home 
of  Mistress  Ann  Hutchinson  at  Pelham,  1642-3"  and  another  on 
"A  Visit  to  Fort  St.  George"  at  Smith's  Point,  Mastic,  Long  Island. 
The  second  installment  of  "American  Revolutionary  Diaries"  by 
Dr.  W.  S.  Thomas,  is  given. 

The  Proceedings  of  the  New  Jersey  Historical  Society  for  July, 
1922,  continues  "A  Young  Man's  Journal  of  1800-1813"  which  has 
material  about  New  York  especially  about  the  routes  to  and  from 
that  city.  In  the  same  number  there  is  an  article  by  William  H. 
Benedict  on  "The  Growth  of  our  Postal  Facilities"  and  another 
by  Cornelius  C,  Vermeule  on  "Number  of  Soldiers  in  the  Revolu- 
tion." The  latter  author  would  have  found  some  much  more  ac- 
curate material  about  New  York  in  New  York  in  the  Revolution 
edited  by  James  A.  Roberts.  There  is  a  good  obituary  notice  of 
Rev.  Roswell  Randall  Hoes  and  a  notice  about  the  purchase  of 
General  Knox's  Headquarters  near  Newburgh,  New  York. 

The  New  York  Times  Book  Review  and  Magazine,  for  March  26, 
1922,  has  an  article  entitled  "Greenwich  Village,  First  of  Boom 
Towns"  which  is  in  reality  a  review  of  H.  W.  Lanier's  book  A 
Century  of  Banking  in  New  York. 

In  The  Christian  Intelligencer  and  Mission  Field  for  August  30, 
1922,  Alma  R.  Van  Hoevenberg,  has  an  article  entitled  "Lest  We 
Forget"  which  deals  with  the  first  settlement  of  the  Dutch  in 
New  York  and  the  necessity  for  preserving  records. 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  273 

The  Ohio  Archaeological  and  Historical  Quarterly  for  July,  1922, 
is  largely  taken  up  with  articles  on  the  anniversary  of  the  birth  of 
General  Grant. 

In  the  volume  entitled  Presidential  Campaign  of  1832  by 
Samuel  Rhea  Gammon,  Jr.,  Ph.D.,  Series  XL,  No.  1,  oiihe  Johns 
Hopkins  University  Studies  in  Historical  and  Political  Science 
there  is  a  great  deal  of  material  about  Martin  Van  Buren  of  New- 
York,  who  ran  for  vice-president  on  the  ticket  with  Andrew  Jack- 
son. William  L.  Marcy  and  the  Livingstons  come  in  for  mention 
as  well  as  the  New  York -Virginia  political  alliance. 

The  New  York  Genealogical  and  Biographical  Record  iorjanxxary, 
1922,  has  articles  on  the  "Ellwood  Genealogy"  [Richard  Ellwood 
originally  settled  on  the  Mohawk];  "The  Abel  Smiths  of  Hemp- 
stead, Long  Island;"  "William  Thome  of  Flushing,  Long  Island;" 
"Westchester  County, N.  Y., Miscellanea"  [continued];  "A  Letter 
from  Gershom  Mott,  Written  from  the  Headquarters  of  the 
American  Army  before  Quebec,  March  31,  1776;"  "The  Oblong," 
[an  account  of  this  tract  and  its  cession  to  New  York  by  Con- 
necticut]; "'Outen  Bogart  Bible"  of  Fordham,  N.  Y. ;  "Jacob  Jan- 
sen  van  Etten"  [of  Kingston];  "Tompkins  County  Gravestone 
Inscriptions"  [continued].  There  is  also  announced  the  receipt 
of  numerous  manuscript  copies  of  church  records  from  various 
villages  in  New  York  State. 

The  New  York  Geneaolgical  and  Biographical  Record  for  April, 
1922,  has  the  "Ellwood  Genealogy"  [continued];  "Tompkins 
County  Gravestone  Inscriptions"  [continued].  The  Record  an- 
nounces receipt  of  manuscripts  containing  "Vital  Records  of  the 
Town  of  Lenox,  Madison  County,  N.  Y.,"  by  Mrs.  Charlotte  I. 
Luckhurst ;  "Marriages  of  the  Reformed  Protetsant  Dutch  Church 
of  Chatham,  N.  Y.,"  by  Thomas  Milton;  "De  Witt  Family  of 
Ulster  County,  N.Y.,"  "Jay  Manuscript  Notes;"  "Newtown,  Long 
Island,  N.  Y.,  Presbyterian  Church  Records;"  "Records  of  the 
Paris  Religious  Society  of  Paris,  Cneida  County,  N.  Y. ;"  "Records 
of  the  South  Reformed  Dutch  Church  in  Garden  Street,  New  York 
City." 

In  The  Journal  of  American  Genecology  for  October,  November, 
December,  1921,  are  articles  on  the  "Schneider  Family  of  Columbia 


274  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

County,  New  York,"  by  Frank  Allaben;  "Vital  Records  from 
Old  New  York  Newspapers"  by  Wharton  Dickinson;  "Goelet  and 
Related  Families"  by  Georgia  Cooper  Washburn. 

In  The  Journal  of  American  Geneaology  for  January,  February, 
March,  1922,  are  articles  on  "Vital  Records  from  Old  New  York 
Newspapers"  by  Wharton  Dickinson;  "The  Ackerly  Family  of 
Long  Island"  by  H.  Francis  Smith. 

The  Journal  of  American  History  for  October,  November,  De- 
cember, 1921,  is  devoted  to  articles  commemorating  the  Pilgrim 
Tercentenary.  In  the  January,  February,  March,  1922,  nimiber 
are  articles  about  Margaret  Cochran  Corbin  the  heroine  of  Fort 
Washington  who  is  said  to  be  buried  in  Congruity  Graveyard  in 
Westmoreland  Coimty,  Pennsylvania.  There  also  apppears  the 
'  'Journal  of  John  Cotton,  through  New  York  City  and  Philadelphia' ' 
on  his  way  from  Rhode  Island  to  Ohio  in  1815.  There  is  continued 
"A  History  of  Banks  and  Banking  in  New  York  City"  by  Frank 
Allaben  and  W.  Harrison  Bayles,  of  which  this  installment  is 
chapter  VII.  Accompanying  this  article  are  a  portrait  of  Alexander 
Hamilton,  a  picture  of  the  City  Hall  in  New  York,  of  Manhattan 
Bank  Water  Works  and  of  the  Hamilton-Burr  Duelling  Grounds. 

The  Bulletin  of  the  New  York  Public  Library  for  July  1922  has 
an  illustrated  article  on  the  "Beadle  Collection."  This  was  the 
celebrated  series  of  "Divine  Novels"  which  began  to  be  issued  in 
New  York  City  in  the  sixties. 

The  American  Scenic  and  Historic  Preservation  Society  Report 
for  igzi  carries  numerous  articles  of  interest  on  historic  build- 
ings, markers  and  parks  in  New  York  City  and  New  York  State. 
In  addition  it  has  much  material  on  a  nation  wide  survey  of  state 
parks,  national  parks  and  monuments,  statistics  and  memorials  of 
the  World  War,  foreign  historic  affairs,  the  Pilgrim  Tercentenary 
and  Lieutenant  Colonel  Stephen  Rochefontaine.  As  is  usual 
with  such  reports.  Dr.  Edward  Hagamon  Hall,  the  editor,  has 
brought  together  a  veritable  encyclopedia  of  facts  for  many  of 
which  he  has  numerous  illustrations. 

In  The  Southwestern  Historical  Quarterly  for  Jul}^  1922,  is  an 
article  by  Adele  B.  Looscan  on  the  "Life  and  Service  of  John  Bird- 
sail,"  who  was  prominent  in  early  Chautauqua  County,  N.  Y., 
politics  and  then  became  one  of  the  pioneers  of  Texas. 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  275 

Dr.  John  M.  Clarke  has  published  a  voltime  entitled  James  Hall 
of  Albany,  Geologist  and  Palaeontologist.  (Albany:  S.  C.  Bishop, 
1921.) 

Grover  Cleveland:  a  study  in  political  courage,  is  the  title  of  a  book 
by  Roland  Hugins  published  by  the  Anchor-Lee  Publishing  Co., 
Washington,  D.  C. 

My  Memories  of  Eighty  Years  by  Chauncey  M.  Depew  has  been 
published  in  book  form  by  Scribner's. 

Professor  R.  W.  Kelsey  of  Haverford  has  edited  the  Cazenove 
Journal,  1794.  It  will  be  recalled  that  Theophile  Cazenove  came 
to  this  country  in  1790  in  the  interests  of  Dutch  bankers.  The 
formation  of  the  Holland  Land  Company  with  Cazenove  as  its 
first  general  agent  was  the  result. 

The  American  Geographical  Society  has  issued  A  Description  of 
Early  Maps,  Originals  and  Facsimiles,  1452-1611,  by  Edward  L. 
Stevenson.  These  are  such  as  are  found  in  the  Society's  collections. 
The  Society  has  reprinted  A  Short  Account  of  the  First  Settlement 
of  the  Provinces  of  Virginia,  Maryland,  Nevu  York,  New  Jersey,  and 
Pennsylvania  by  the  English.  (173f .) 

Henry  W.  Lanier  has  written  A  Century  of  Banking  in  New  York, 
1822-1922,  which  is  published  by  the  George  H.  Doran  Company. 

The  Holland  Society  of  New  York  has  printed  a  little  pamphlet 
entitled  The  Dutch  of  the  Netherlands  in  the  Making  of  America, 
by  William  EUiot  Griffis.     (1921.) 

The  Riverhead  Savings  Bank,  1872-1922,  is  the  title  of  a  very 
attractive  book  published  by  the  bank  about  the  history  of  this 
Long  Island  village  and  its  bank.  It  is  handsomely  illustrated 
and  bound.     Otis  G.  Pike  is  the  author. 

The  Mohegan  Chapter  of  the  D.  A.  R.  of  Ossining  has  published 
a  pamphlet  on  the  history  of  the  town  of  Ossining,  New  York, 
under  the  title  of  Reminiscences  of  Ossining,  compiled  by  Florence 
L.  Reynolds,  the  historian  of  the  Chapter.     (1922.) 

The  Policy  of  Albany  and  English  Westward  Expansion,  by  Arthur 
H.  Buffinton  is  the  title  of  a  pamphlet  reprinted  from  The  Missis- 
sippi Valley  Historical  Review,  for  March,  1922. 

Dodd,  Mead  and  Company  have  issued  Leagues  of  the  Ho-de-no- 
sau-nae  of  Iroquois  by  Lewis  H.  Morgan  in  one  volume. 


276  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

Pioneer  Days  and  Later  Times  in  Corning  and  Vicinity;  ijSg- 
J920,  is  the  title  of  a  book  written  by  the  author,  Uri  Mulford. 

Theodore  Roosevelt  and  His  Times;  a  Chronicle  of  The  Progressive 
Movement,  by  Howard  J.  Rowland  has  been  issued  by  the  Yale 
University  Press. 

Something  about  the  influence  of  the  embargo  on  New  York's 
commerce  is  to  be  found  in  the  work  by  Walter  W.  Jennings  en- 
titled The  American  Embargo,  iSoy-iSog,  published  by  the  Univer- 
sity of  Iowa,  at  Iowa  City,  Iowa. 

History  of  the  Wanzer  Family  in  America  is  the  title  of  a  book 
issued  by  Wilham  David  Wanzer  of  No.  782  Massachusetts 
Avenue,  Arlington,  Mass. 

The  150th  Anniversary  of  the  Oragnization  of  Saint  John's  Re- 
formed Church  of  Saint  Johnsville,  N.  Y.  is  the  title  of  a  little 
pamphlet  by  Lou  D.  MacWethy  of  that  village.  The  same  author 
also  publishes  another  pamphlet  entitled  Following  the  Old  Mohawk 
Turnpike. 

Stories  of  the  Raftsmen  is  the  title  of  a  pamphlet  by  Charles  T. 
Curtis  which  has  been  reprinted  from  articles  which  appeared  in 
the  Sullivan  County  Democrat  of  Callicoon,  N.  Y.,  1922. 

Was  Molly  Brant  Married?  is  the  title  of  a  pamphlet  by  Hon. 
Wm.  Renwick  Riddell,  LL.D.,  from  the  Ontario  Historical  Society's 
Papers  and  Records,  volume  19,  which  covers  and  disposes  of  the 
legends  which  have'  grown  up  about  her  ecclesiastical  or  legal 
marriage  to  Sir  William  Johnson. 

The  Gramercy  Park  Association  publishes  The  Story  of  Gramercy 
Park  [N.  Y.  City]  by  John  B.  Pine. 

Correspondence  of  James  Fenimore  Cooper,  edited  by  his  grand- 
son, James  Fenimore  Cooper,  is  published  by  the  Yale  University 
Press  of  New  Haven. 

The  Autobiography  of  John  Francis  Hylan,  is  issued  by  the  Ro- 
tary Press,  New  York. 

The  Macmillan  Company  publishes  The  McKinley  and  Roosevelt 
Administrations  by  James  Ford  Rhodes. 

Governors  Island:  Its  Military  History  under  Three  Flags,  by 
Edmund  B.  Smith,  is  published  by  the  Valentine's  Manual  Com- 
pany of  New  York. 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  277 

Bibliographical  Survey  of  Contemporary  Sources  for  the  Economic 
and  Social  History  of  the  War,  by  M.  E.  Bulkley,  has  been  issued 
by  the  Oxford  University  Press,  New  York. 

My  Years  on  the  Stage,  by  John  Drew,  is  published  by  E.  P. 
Button  &  Co.,  New  York. 

Roosevelt's  Religion,  by  Christian  F.  Reisner  is  pubhshed  by  the 
Abingdon  Press,  New  York. 

History  of  Freemasonry  in  the  State  of  Nevu  York,  by  Ossian  Lang, 
is  published  by  the  Grand  Lodge  of  New  York. 

The  Works  of  Samuel  de  Champlain,  edited  by  H.  P.  Biggar,  to 
be  completed  in  six  volumes,  of  which  one  has  been  issued,  are 
published  by  the  Champlain  Society  of  Toronto. 

My  Boyhood,  by  John  Burroughs,  is  published  by  Doubleday 
Page  &  Co.,  Garden  City,  New  York. 

Elizabeth  Cady  Stanton,  edited  by  Theodore  Stanton  and  Harriot 
Stanton  Blatch,  is  published  by  Harper  &  Brothers,  New  York. 

The  American  Jewish  Committee  of  New  York  has  issued  a 
biography  of  Jacob  Henry  Schiff  by  Cyrus  Adler. 

In  the  Memoirs  of  the  Harvard  Dead  in  the  War  Against  Germany, 
compiled  by  M.  A.  De  Wolfe  Howe  and  published  by  the  Harvard 
University  Press  at  Cambridge  there  are  accounts  of  several  men 
from  New  York. 

William  Dean  Howells,  by  Delmar  Gross  Cooke,  has  been  pub- 
lished by  E.  P.  Button  &  Co.,  New  York. 

MUSEUMS,    HISTORIC   MONUMENTS    AND   REMAINS 

Mrs.  Joan  E.  Secor,  Local  Historian  of  Pelham  has  started  a 
movement  to  erect  suitable  markers  to  show  the  "Old  Boston 
Road"  and  the  site  of  the  "Battle  of  Pelham." 

The  high  school  at  Mount  Morris  has  been  presented  with  what 
is  said  to  be  a  War  of  1812  cannon,  but  nothing  is  definitely  known 
of  its  history. 

An  attempt  is  being  made  by  Dr.  F.  H.  Severance  to  have  the 
City  preserve  the  old  Seneca  Mission  House  in  South  Buffalo. 

The  Kings  County  Historical  Society  is  still  working  to  have  a 
public  park  made  of  the  site  at  Third  Street  and  Fifth  avenue 


278  NOTES  AND  QUERIES 

Brooklyn,  where  the  severest  fighting  in  the  battle  of  Long  Island 
took  place.     Near  here  was  the  Old  Gowanus  House. 

In  the  Washington  Headquarters  at  White  Plains  is  a  table 
round  which  Washington  and  his  generals  are  said  to  have  sat  in 
council.     There  are  also  a  Revolutionary  bayonet  and  grape  shot. 

The  Herkimer  County  Historical  Society  has  been  given  a  five 
dollar  bill  issued  by  the  Agricultural  Bank  of  Herkimer  in  1844. 

The  historic  road  from  Fort  Plain  to  Cooperstown  was  opened 
as  a  state  highway  September  7,  1922.  It  is  said  that  this  is  the 
route  Washington  followed  on  his  visit  to  the  Mohawk  country. 

The  Pipe  Stave  Hollow  Road  at  Mt.  Sinai,  Long  Island,  in  the 
town  of  Brookhaven,  along  which  Major  Tallmadge  led  his  raiders 
in  1780,  was  being  closed  by  a  real  estate  company  and  protests 
are  being  filed  by  the  old  residents. 

Cn  Saturday,  September  16,  1922,  exercises  were  held  at  the 
]\lonroe  County  Coiu-t  House  at  Rochester,  New  York,  in  honor  of 
the  pioneers  of  Rochester.  The  occasion  was  the  unveiling  of  a 
bronze  tablet  to  the  memory  of  John  Mastick,  1780-1827,  the 
pioneer  lawyer  of  Rochester,  given  by  the  Rochester  Bar  As- 
sociation and  the  Rochester  Historical  Society. 

WORLD   WAR   MEMORIALS    AND    COLLECTIONS 

Middletown  has  dedicated  one  of  its  new  grammer  schools  as  a 
memorial  to  its  soldiers  and  sailors  in  the  World  War.  A  bronze 
tablet  bearing  the  names  of  those  who  died  will  be  placed  in  the 
main  corridor. 

The  Albany  Academy  for  Boys  has  a  bronze  tablet  on  which 
are  inscribed  the  names  of  281  former  students  who  ser\^ed  in  the 
World  War. 

At  Syracuse  there  has  been  erected  a  bronze  tablet  on  a  boulder 
in  Lincoln  Park  on  which  are  inscribed  the  names  of  the  former 
students  of  the  Lincoln  and  Cleveland  schools  who  died  in  the 
World  War. 

On  Thursday,  November  11,  1921,  there  was  unveiled  at  Dele- 
van,  Cattaraugus  County,  a  granite  and  bronze  monument  as  a 
memorial  to  the  soldiers  and  sailors  from  the  town  of  Yorkshire 
and  the  village  of  Delevan  in  the  World  War.     It  was  made  the 


NOTES  AND  QUERIES  279 

occasion  of  the  gathering  of  the  ex-service  men.     The  program 
arranged  by  Mrs.  J.  0.  Walldorff,  the  local  historian. 

Brigadier  General  J.  Leslie  Kincaid,  Adjutant-General  of  New 
York  State  has  issued  the  Roll  of  Honor  which  contains  the  names 
of  those  citizens  of  the  State  of  New  York  who  died  while  in  the 
service  of  the  United  States  dining  the  World  War.  It  is  published 
for  the  State  by  the  J.  B.  Lyon  Company,  Albany,  1922.  The 
names  are  arranged  according  to  counties  except  for  New  York 
City,  which  stands  by  itself.  Within  the  counties  the  names  are 
listed  under  the  United  States  Army,  United  States  Navy  and 
United  States  Marine  Corps.  The  men's  names  are  given,  their 
addresses,  the  units  to  which  they  belonged  and  the  manner  and 
date  of  death.  Unfortunately,  the  place  where  they  were  killed 
or  died  is  not  given.  This  is,  however,  no  fault  of  General  Kincaid, 
as  the  Adjutant-General  at  Washington  said  that  such  information 
could  not  be  furnished.  Why  not,  has  not  been  made  clear  as 
such  items  were  furnished  for  the  Civil  War.  For  the  Navy  no 
other  information  is  given  than  that  the  man  died  and  this  is  fol- 
lowed by  the  date  of  death. 

An  examination  of  the  list  shows  that  they  are  not  very  ac- 
curate due  to  the  fact  that  the  work  in  the  Adjutant-General's 
office  in  Washington  was  done  in  a  very  hasty  and  inexpert  manner. 
Approximate  accuracy  for  New  York  State  will  only  be  obtained 
through  the  checking  up  by  our  local  historians,  who  are  in  a 
better  position  to  know  which  of  the  soldiers,  sailors  and  marines 
died  in  the  World  War  than  are  the  authorities  at  Washington. 


STATEMENT 


Statement  of  Ownership,  Management,  Circulation,  etc.,  required  by  the 
Act  of  Congress  of  August  24,  1912,  of  the  Quarterly  Journal  of  the  New 
York  State  Historical  Association,  published  quarterly  at  Albany,  N.  Y.,  for 
October  1,  1922,  State  of  New  York,  County  of  Albany.  Before  me,  a  Notary 
Public,  in  and  for  the  State  and  County  aforesaid,  personally  appeared  James 
Sullivan,  who,  having  been  duly  sworn  according  to  law,  deposes  and  saj^s 
that  he  is  the  Editor  of  the  Quarterly  Journal  of  the  New  York  State  His- 
torical Association,  and  that  the  following  is,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge  and 
belief,  a  true  statement  of  the  ownership,  management,  etc.,  of  the  aforesaid 
publication  for  the  date  shown  in  the  above  caption,  required  by  the  Act  of 
August  24,  1912.  Publisher,  New  York  State  Historical  Association.  Editor 
and  Managing  Editor,  James  Sullivan,  Albany,  New  York.  Business  Manager, 
none.  2.  That  the  owners  are:  The  New  York  State  Historical  Association 
and  issues  no  stock;  officers  are  Gilbert  D.  B.  Hasbrouck,  Kingston,  President; 
Frank  H.  Severance,  Buffalo,  First  Vice-President;  James  Riggs,  Oswego, 
Second  Vice-President;  James  Sullivan,  Albany,  Corresponding  Secretary, 
and  Frederick  B.  Richards,  Glens  Falls,  Recording  Secretary  and  Treasurer. 
3.  That  the  known  bondholders,  mortgagees  and  other  security  holders  own- 
ing or  holding  1  per  cent  or  more  of  total  amount  of  bonds,  mortgages,  or  other 
securities  are:  None.  Signed,  James  Sullivan,  Editor.  Sworn  to  and  sub- 
scribed before  me  this  25th  day  of  September,  1922.  (Seal.)  Rose  M.  Ahem, 
Notary  Public.     (My  commission  expires  April  30,  1923.) 


PUBLICATIONS  OF  THE    NEW  YORK  STATE 
HISTORICAL  ASSOCIATION 

Proceedings,  volume  1.  Constitution  and  By-laws;  with  Proceedings  of 
the  second  annual  meeting  at  Lake  George,  N.  Y.,  July  31,  1900.  Miscel- 
laneous papers,  mostly  on  the  Battle  of  Lake  George.     1901.     79  p. 

Proceedings,  volume  2.  Third  annual  meeting  at  Lake  George,  N.  Y.,  July 
30,  1901.     Miscellaneous  papers,  mostly  on  Ticonderoga.     1902.     74  p. 

Proceedings,  volume  3.  Fourth  annual  meeting  at  Lake  George,  N.  Y., 
Tulv  29,  1902.  Miscellaneous  papers,  mostly  on  Burgoyne's  Campaign, 
1903.     88  p. 

Proceedings,  volume  4.  Fifth  annual  meeting  at  Lake  George,  N.  Y., 
August  25,  1903.     Miscellaneous  papers.     1904.     106  p. 

Proceedings,  volume  5.  Sixth  annual  meeting  at  Lake  George,  N.  Y., 
August  16,  1904.  Miscellaneous  papers,  largely  on  the  Battle  of  Benning- 
ton.    1905.     199  p. 

Proceedings,  volume  6.  Seventh  annual  meeting  at  Lake  George,  N.  Y., 
August  22,  1905.  Miscellaneous  papers,  mostly  on  Sullivan's  Expedition; 
with  E.  M.  Ruttenber's  Indian  Geographical  Names.     1906.     241  p. 

Proceedings,  volume  7.  Eighth  annual  meeting  at  Lake  George,  N.  Y., 
August  21-22,  1906.  Miscellaneous  papers,  mostly  on  the  Revolution; 
1907.     147  p. 

Proceedings,  volume  8.  Ninth  annual  meeting  at  Buffalo,  N.  Y.,  September 
17,  1907.  Miscellaneous  papers,  mostly  on  the  Niagara  frontier;  and  tenth 
annual  meeting  at  Albany,  N.  Y.,  October  12-14,  1908.  Miscellaneous 
papers,  mostly  on  Albany.     1909.     316  p. 

Proceedings,  volume  9.  Eleventh  annual  meeting  at  Mount  Vernon,  N.  Y., 
October  19-20, 1909.     Miscellaneous  papers,  largely  on  Westchester  county. 

1910.  445  p. 

Proceedings,  volume  10.  Twelfth  annual  meeting  on  Lake  Champlain, 
October  4-7,   1910.     Miscellaneous  papers,  mostly  on  Lake  Champlain. 

1911.  552  p. 

Proceedings,  volume  11.     Thirteenth  annual  meeting  at  Kingston,  N.  Y., 

September  12-14,  1911.     Miscellaneous  papers,  mostly  on  Ulster  county. 

381  pages;  with  Dutch  Records  of  Kingston,   171+xvii  pages.     1912. 
Proceedings,  volume  12.     Fourteenth  annual  meeting  at  Saratoga  vSprings, 

N.  Y.,  Bennington  Vt.,  and  Schuylerville,  N.  Y.,  September  17-20,  1912. 

Miscellaneous  papers,  mostly  on  the  Battle  of  Saratoga.     1913.     423  p. 
Proceedings,  volume  13.     Fifteenth  annual  meeting  at  Oswego,   N.  Y., 

September  29-October  2,  1913.     Miscellaneous  papers,  mostly  on  Lake 

Ontario.     1914.     480  p. 
Proceedings,  volume  14.     Sixteenth  annual  meeting  at  Utica,  N.  Y.,  October 

5-8,  1914.     Miscellaneous  papers,  mostly  on  the  Mohawk  valley.     1915. 

504  p. 
Proceedings,  volume  15.     Seventeenth  annual  meeting  at  West  Point,  N.  Y., 

October  5-7,  1915.     Miscellaneous  papers,  mostly  on  West  Point.     1916. 

360  p. 
Proceedings,  volume  16.     Eighteenth  annual  meeting  at  Cooperstown,  N.  Y., 

October  3-5,  1916.     Miscellaneous  papers.     1917.     356  p. 
Proceedings,  volume  17.     Nineteenth  annual  meeting  at  New  York  City, 

October  2-4,  1917.     Papers  largely  on  New  York  City.     1919.     480  p. 
Proceedings,  volume  18.     Twentieth  annual  meeting  at  Rochester,  N.  Y., 

October  8-10,  1919.     Biographies  and  Rochester  sketches.     1920.     314  p. 
Proceedings,  volume  19.     Twenty-first  annual  meeting  at  Bear  Mountain, 

N.  Y.,  October  6-8,  1920.     Miscellaneous  papers,  mostly  on  the  lower 

Hudson  valley.     1921.    281  p.