HD
76
W8
•
a?o
REASONABLENESS AND LEGAL RIGHT
OF THE
MINIMUM CHARGE"
IN
PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICES
BY
SAMUEL S. WYER
CONSULTING ENGINEER
HUNTINGTON BANK BUILDING
COLUMBUS. OHIO
JULY 1, 1916
HON. THOS. J. FLAN NELLY, District Court of Montgomery
County, Independence, Kansas.
DEAR SIR : When on the witness stand in your Court, on June
30th, "on the matter of devising an equitable rate schedule for
the Kansas Natural Gas Company, to comply with the opinion
of the District Court of the United States, under date of June 3,
1916," I promised to prepare a compilation showing the use of
the "minimum charge" in American Public Utility Rate Sched-
ules. Later on you authorized me to have this printed so as to
make a number of copies available immediately for use of your
Court.
The fundamental principles underlying, and the adjudicated
"minimum charge" monetary allowances in force in a large num-
ber of Public Utility Rate Schedules are given in the following.
A careful study of these will show that:
1. The "minimum charge" doctrine has become a fixed part
of American Public Utility jurisprudence.
2. A "minimum charge" is necessary to prevent discrimination
and compel each class of consumers to pay for the ser-
vice they are receiving, and the cost they are incurring.
3. There are ample precedents for making the "minimum
charge" proportional to the size of the consumer's meter,
or the consumer's possible demand for service as illus-
trated in Sections 28, 35, 42, 49, 66, 73, 75, 76, 84 and 88.
Respectfully submitted,
o f» er er +*
PART I
FUNDAMENTAL, PRINCIPLES . PAGE
1 Introduction 5
2 Definition of Readiness-to-Serve 5
3 Readiness-to-Serve and Minimum Charge Distinguished 6
4 Meter Rental Distinguished from Readiness-to-Serve and Minimum
Charge 6
5 Public is More Familiar with "Minimum Charge" than wtth Readi-
ness-to-Serve Charge 6
6 Extent of Readiness-to-Serve Expense 6
7 Minimum Charge not a Discrimination Against Small Consumers 7
8 Absence of Minimum Charge Produces Discrimination 8
9 Object of Minimum Charge 8
10 Minimum Charge Necessary and Just 8
1 1 Minimum Charge is not a Penalty 9
12 Minimum Charge Must be Large Enough to Cover Cost of Units of
Service Used 9
13 Minimum Charge Necessary until Service is Discontinued 10
14 Monthly Basis for Minimum Charge Best 10
15 Minimum Charge should be Proportioned to Consumers' Demand- • • n
1 6 Legal Right of the Minimum Charge •. . 1 1
17 Missouri Supreme Court 1 1
18 Missouri Supreme Court 12
19 New York Supreme Court 12
20 Tennessee Supreme Court 13
2 1 Kansas Supreme Court 13
22 Arizona Supreme Court 14
PART II
ADJUDICATED MONTHLY MONETARY ALLOWANCES FOR MINIMUM CHARGES
23 Arizona Corporation Commission Electric Utilities 15
24 . " Gas " 15
25 " " Water " 16
26 California Railroad Commission Electric " • . ' 16
27 " Gas " 17
28 " " " Water " 17
29 Colorado Public Utilities Commission Electric " 17
30 " " " Gas '• 18
31 Connecticut Public Utilities Commission. .-Gas " 18
32 " " " ...Water " 18
33 Georgia Railroad Commission ...Electric " 18
34 Idaho Public Utilities Commission Electric " 18
35 " " " ... Water . " 19
3
I'.U.K
36 Illinois Public Utilities Commission Electric Utilities- • . 19
37 " " Gas " ... 19
38 Water " ... 19
39 Indiana Public Service Commission Electric " ... 20
40 Artificial Gas " ... 20
41 " Natural Gas " ... 20
42 " '. Water " ... 21
43 Kansas Public Utilities Commission Electric " ... 22
44 " Natural Gas " ... 22
45 Water " ... 22
46 Manila Board of Public Utility Commissioners. .Electric " ... 22
47 Maryland Public Service Commission Electric " • • • 22
48 " " Gas " ... 22
49 Water " . . . 23
50 Massachusetts Gas & Electric Light Comm'n . • Electric " ... 23
51 " " " ' .-Gas " • • • 23
52 Missouri Public Service Commission Electric " • • . 23
53 " Gas "... 24
54 " Water " ... 24
55 Montana Public Service Commission Electric " ... 25
56 Nevada Public Service Commission Electric " • - • 25
57 New Jersey Board of Public Utility Commiss'rs-. Electric " . . . 25
58 " " " " Gas " ... 26
59 " " Water " ... 26
60 New Hampshire Public Service Commission. . -Gas " ... 26
61 New York Public Service Commission— Second
District Electric " ... 27
62 New York Public Service Commission — Second
District Natural Gas " ... 27
63 Ohio Public Utilities Commission Electric " ... 27
64 Oklahoma Corporation Commission Electric ' ... 27
65 Oregon Public Service Commission Electric " ... 27
66 " " " Water " ... 28
67 Pennsylvania Public Service Commission Electric " ... 28
68 " " " Water •' ... 29
69 Vermont Public Service Commission Electric " ... 29
70 Washington Public Service Commission Electric " ... 29
71 " " " Water " ... 29
72 West Virginia Public Service Commission Electric " ... 29
73 " Water " ... 29
74 Wisconsin Railroad Commission Electric " ... 29
75 Gas " ... 34
76 " Water " . . . 37
PART III
NON-ADJUDICATED MINIMUM CHARGES IN EXISTING RATE SCHEDULES
PAGE
77 Connecticut Public Utilities Commission Electric Utilities. . . 40
78 Massachusetts Gas & Electric Light Commis'n -Electric " ... 40
79 " " " Gas " ... 46
80 " " Water " . . . 47
81 New York Public Service Commission — Second
District Electric " ... 48
82 " Artificial Gas " ... 69
83 Natural Gas " ... 70
84 Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission Electric " ... 71
85 West Virginia Public Service Commission Electric " ... 71
86 " .. -Natural Gas " . . . 73
87 " " " Water " ... 76
88 United States Census Statistics on Water W7orks
Minimum Charges " ... 77
PART I.
FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES.
§ i. Introduction.
The following is a brief discussion of the fundamental prin-
ciples underlying the "minimum charge" in public utility ser-
vices. The minimum charge monetary allowances that have been
judicially determined in a large number of adjudicated cases, are
tabulated in Part II. The minimum charge monetary allowances
in force in a large number of other rate schedules are tabulated
in Part III.
The following abbreviations are used :
I. C. C. — Interstate Commerce Commission Reports.
Mo. P. S. C. — Missouri Public Service Commission Reports.
N. H. P. S. C. — New Hampshire Public Service Commis-
sion Reports.
N. J. P. S. C. — New Jersey Public Service Commission
Reports.
P. U. R. — Public Utility Reports Annotated.
R. S. — Rate Research (published by National Electric Light
Association).
YV. R. C. — Wisconsin Railroad Commission Reports.
The asterisk (*) indicates that data were furnished by mail
from the Commission.
§ 2. Definition of Readiness-to-Serve.
"Readiness-to-serve" is a form of minimum charge made to
cover the costs incurred by the utility in holding itself in constant
readiness to render service, without, however, delivering any
units of service. The actual units of service (such as kilowatt
hours of electric energy, cubic feet of gas, gallons of water, or
number of messages) used are paid for by an additional rate
schedule.
The readiness-to-serve charge has been made primarily in elec-
tric utilities; however, this practice is applicable to all public
utility rate schedules. The term "demand charge" is used syn-
onymously with "readiness-to-serve."1
1 Case and Comment, May, 1916.
§ 3- Readiness-to-Serve and Minimum Charge Distinguished.
"The term 'minimum charge/ as used in public utility rate par-
lance, means merely the minimum monthly bill which will be
rendered, which includes a certain definite number of units of
public utility service. The consumer, however, pays the entire
minimum bill, regardless of whether or not he has used the
number of units of public utility service that go with the mini-
mum bill charge.""
§ 4. Meter Rental Distinguished from Readiness-to-Serve and
Minimum Charge.
"The readiness-to-serve charge is made simply for service
rendered. The minimum bill charge is a combination charge for
service rendered and a certain number of units of service sold.
"A meter rental is rental for equipment which the utility is
under obligation to furnish the customer, and the rental is added
to the bill regardless of the monthly service consumption. It is
wrong in principle and cannot legally be enforced. Failure to
distinguish between readiness-to-serve, minimum charge, and
meter rental has been the cause of much confusion and some
unsound decisions from judicial bodies."3
§ 5. Public is More Familiar with "Minimum Charge" than with
"Rcadiness-to-Serve" Charge.
This is due to the public's contact, for many years, with the
"minimum weight" and "minimum charge" features in railroad
and express company schedules, and more recently in the parcels
post. Practically all telephone schedules also are on a minimum
charge basis, and this has helped to familiarize the public with
this style of charging, rather than the straight readiness-to-serve
charge, which is newer.
§ 6. Extent of Readiness-to-Serve Expense.
A popular fallacy regarding the readiness-to-serve expense is
that it is limited to merely the meter or service line. This, how-
ever, is far from the truth. The readiness-to-serve feature em-
2 Case and Comment, May, 1916.
3 Case and Comment, May, 1916.
braces the entire plant, and extends back through the entire public
utility organization. Thus, in natural gas plants the reserve
acreage, that is carried to insure continuous service in the future,
and to replace the ever-vanishmg supply, is as much an integral
part of the readiness-to-serve feature as is the domestic meter
through which the company finally markets the gas to the ulti-
mate consumer. Even if the natural gas company does not
carry the acreage direct, the readiness-to-serve feature will be
reflected in the price that the natural gas company must pay for
gas in the field.
Continuity of service is also a vital feature in the readiness-
to-serve expense. The public utility plant must not only be main-
tained in readiness-to-serve, but must be capable of rendering
service every hour of the day, and every day of the year, ever
ready to meet the consumers' caprice in using or not using its
service. This feature is, of course, especially marked in electric,
water and gas utilities.
§ 7. Minimum Charge Not a Discrimination Against Small Con-
sumers.
"In the last analysis, the consumers of a public utility are all
mutually interested in each other's financial relation to the utility.
It is the legal duty of utilities so to classify and fix their charges
and financial relations with their consumers that the burdens of
the utility's service shall be reasonably, justly, and equitably, but
not necessarily equally, distributed over the service rendered its
consumers."4
No ethical grounds, sociological motives, or legal obligations
can justify the rendering of public utility service to the so-called
poorer people of the community at a price, or on a basis, that
makes others pay for their service. In this connection it is
important to bear in mind that the term "small consumer" and
"poor man" are frequently erroneously used synonymously. With
natural gas companies a large number of careful studies have
shown, beyond any possibility of doubt, that in most cases the
small consumer is not the poor man, but the man of moderate or
4 Case and Comment, March, 1916.
8
well-to-do circumstances, and who can well afford to pay for the
expense he is adding to the service in general.
"It is undoubtedly true that the exaction of a minimum charge
will result in an apparent hardship to a small number of con-
sumers who use their equipment but a very short time, in some
cases not more than four or five hours per month. The fact
must not be lost sight of, however, that the supply of electric
power is strictly a commercial proposition,' and to relieve one
customer from the payment of any considerable portion of the
cost would merely result in transferring the burden to other cus-
tomers, and such a transfer does not appear to be justified."5
§ 8. Absence of Minimum Charge Produces Discrimination.
"Where no minimum charge is made, the company is compelled
to carry considerable dead investment, and to incur other ex-
penses for those consumers who pay nothing or very little to the
company ; and that, where such costs are not borne by consumers
for whom they are incurred, they usually have to be carried by
other consumers, and are, therefore, in a sense discriminatory."6
§ 9. Object of Minimum Charge.
"The chief argument for the minimum charge is that it covers
expense that in the ordinary rate schedules cannot be covered in
any other way."7
"The question of the effect of this minimum charge on the
revenues of the utility is not of first importance in determining
the reasonableness of such a charge. The main purpose of the
minimum charge is rather to make it certain that each consumer
bears his just share of the expenses incurred in supplying
service."8
§ 10. Minimum Charge Necessary and Just.
"Under meter rates revenue is available only when service is
used, and it is a common experience that many customers do not
use sufficient service to incur a bill large enough to meet the
5 i N. J. P. U. C. p. 620— Minimum monthly charge matter.
6 5 W. R. C. p. 105- -In re Application Green Bay Gas & Electric Co.
7 5 W. R. C. p. 101, In re Green Bay Gas & Electric Co.
8 6 W. R. C. p 163, In re Greenwood Municipal lyight Plant.
fixed expenses alone. A minimum bill there tore is both necessary
and just."a 10
A long line of decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commis-
sion, and the Wisconsin Railroad Commission, have also justified
the fixing of a minimum weight and charge for transportation
services, thus :
"The necessary expense and trouble attending the carriage of
less than carload shipments, large or small, which, aside from
the manual labor involved, are practically the same irrespective
of the weight and bulk of packages, justifies the fixing of a
minimum charge for the transportation of such shipments."11
§11. Minimum Charge is Not a Penalty.
The minimum charge is not a penalty for a failure to use ser-
vice, "but is properly to be regarded as compensation for that
part of the service which is at all times being rendered in the
maintenance of the apparatus and connection through which the
service is made available."12
§ 12. Minimum Charge Must be Large Enougii to Cover Cost of
Units of Service Used.
"It is clearly seen that where the minimum bill covers only the
bare consumer cost and fixed charges, there will be no return to
the company for the gas used by the consumer who pays the
minimum bill. It is evident that a minimum charge, to be fair
and equitable to the company, must not only guarantee these
expenses which are incurred by the company whether the con-
sumer uses much or little gas or none at all, but must also be
placed at a sufficiently high level that the cost of the gas actually
used by the minimum takers shall be paid for."13
"Either the minimum bill must be made sufficiently large to
cover the use of gas through meters affected by the minimum bill,
or the utilities must charge for gas used in addition to the mini-
mum charge. This latter course is not deemed practicable.
0 5 W. R. C. p. i, Ripon v. Ripoii L,ight & Water Co.
1() 5 W. R. C. p. 555, In re Jefferson Municipal E. I*. & W. P.
11 10 I. C. C. Rep. 412, Wrigley v. C. C. C. & St. I,. Ry.
12 60 N. Y. Supp. p. 562, Gould v. Edison E. I. Co.
13 6 W. R. C., p. 315, City of Racine v. Racine Gas Ught Co.
10
Accordingly, we have aimed to construct a schedule of minimum
charges which shall recognize the varying investment in meters
and services, and shall be sufficient to pay the consumer costs
shown in the above tables, and to pay as well for the average
quantity of gas used by meters affected by the minimum."14
§ 13. Minimum Charge Necessary until Service is Discontinued.
"It appears that in a portion of the territory served by appli-
cant, particularly at Newport Beach, a large proportion of appli-
cant's customers own cottages which are occupied during two or
three months in the summer, and that during the remaining por-
tion of the year they are occupied only occasionally, or not at all.
The owners of these cottages object to paying a minimum of
$1.00 during the entire twelve months.
"However, applicant's plant must be maintained in readiness
to serve during the entire year, and applicant's investment is tied
up and its system depreciates during the entire twelve months.
Hence it seems only fair that as long as applicant's customers
remain connected to applicant's system that they should pay a
reasonable minimum monthly. Applicant must be ready to serve
at a moment's notice every customer who is connected to system,
and a proper portion of its investment and of the depreciation is
fairly chargeable to each customer. The sum of $1.00 per month
is a usual minimum charge for gas. I see no reason why it
should not apply to applicant, provided that its customers under-
stand that they have the right to have their service discontinued
at any time and thus avoid the further payment of any minimum
until the premises are again connected. A fee of $1.00 is reason-
able for again making the service connection. . . ,"15
§ 14. Monthly Basis for Minimum Charge Best.
"The exaction of a minimum charge is a reasonable rule and
the making of this charge by the month is just and reasonable,
and is more equitable than if the charge were made by the
year."16
» X. H. P. S. C., p. 445, Pillsbury et al. v. Peoples Gas Light Co.
15 Application of the West Coast Gas Co. for the establishment of a minimum rate for
gas. California Railroad Commission approving a minimum charge Sept. 10, 1914.
10 i N. J. P. U. C., p. 251, Jan. 16, 1912, Minimum monthly charge matter.
II
§ 15. Minimum Charge Should be Proportioned to Consumer's
Demand.
It is a well known fact that consumers with large equipment
produce more marked peak load characteristics, and are, there-
fore, more expensive to handle than smaller consumers. In order
to be equitable a minimum charge ought to be made proportional
to the amount of service the consumer can demand, and the
easiest way to do this is to increase the minimum charge amount,
as the meter sizes increase, as illustrated in Sections 28, 35, 42,
49, 66, 73, 75, 76, 84 and 88 herein.
"A utility may make a reasonable minimum charge for water,
based on the size of the meter and consumption of water, to
protect itself from loss if no water is consumed, but it cannot
make such charge in the form of rental for the meter."17
<§ 1 6. Legal Right of the Minimum Charge.
The preponderance of evidence and precedents show that to
prevent discrimination the minimum charge is economically nec-
essary, ethically sound and legally right. The principles discussed
in the preceding sections, the following six court decisions, and
a long line of several hundred decisions from Public Utility Com-
missions— which for brevity's sake are not quoted — although the
monetary allowances in these cases are given in Part II, indicate
that the minimum charge doctrine has become a fixed part of
American public utility jurisprudence.
§ 17. Missouri Supreme Court.
March 4, 1889.
"The evident purpose of this rule was to exact fair compensa-
tion from those requiring gas connection, and gas furnished at
hand, though the amount consumed should be very small, almost
nominal. We think it is not unjust or unreasonable. It is a mat-
ter of common knowledge, that to furnish gas at hand for a very
small or nominal consumer, requires the same outlay in the way
of a meter, periodical inspection and repairs, with weekly or
monthly visitations, that is required of very large consumers.
17 P. U. R. 1915— E. p. 867 Montana Public Service Commission v. Water Utilities, Aug.
12
The same investment, and the same care and oversight, is re-
quired where the gas monthly consumed shall not exceed 10
cubic feet, or even i cubic foot, or where the amount used may
be 10,000 cubic feet. At the rate charged then in Sedalia, . . .
the gas company would be required to invest and expend, for the
benefit of this merely nominal consumer, more dollars than cents
received. . . . We hold, then, that the rule or regulation in
question, ... is not as a matter of law unreasonable."18
§ 1 8. Missouri Supreme Court.
November 7, 1898.
"The defendant then, apart from the contract, had a right to
fix a fair and reasonable minimum charge to compensate it for
necessary expense and service in inspecting meter, and for ser-
vice used in a quantity not provided for by the contract — 75^
per month was found by the Court to be a reasonable charge for
the meter service."19
§ 19. New York Supreme Court.
October 24, 1914.
"The law does not comtemplate that the defendant shall do
business at a loss. It is expected that it will, and it is entitled
to, make a reasonable profit upon its venture, and the sole ques-
tion in such a case as this is, whether the charge made is un-
reasonable, considering all that the defendant is required to do,
to meet each customer's demand. . . . The customer does
not bind himself to use any particular amount of light, so that
the return to the company, based on actual consumption, would
rest entirely upon his volition, and it would, therefore, depend
upon him whether the service he has required the corporation
to be in constant and immediate readiness to render, is profitable
or unprofitable to the latter. But this constant condition of
readiness is a necessary and unavoidable obligation, which must
be sustained in order to meet instantaneously the demand for
light, which the consumer is entitled to have at any moment that
he wishes it. It thus forms a part of the service to be rendered,
" 34 Mo. App. 501. State ex rel. v. Sedalia Gas lyight Co.
19 76 Mo. App. 540. Carney v. Chillicothe W. & Iv. Co.
13
and is an item properly to be considered when the reasonableness
of the charges exacted by the company is called in question.
. . . They are free to exact a reasonable return for the ser-
vice required, which includes, as I have said, not only the actual
.supply of electric light, but the readiness to supply it. . . .
One consumer with the same number of lamps will use more than
another. In both cases the return to the company may be
remunerative, or the use of one may be so inconsiderable as to
involve a loss. To meet this contingency the monthly minimum
charge of $1.50 is made. But it must be borne in mind that this
payment is not in addition to the charge for actual consumption.
Where light is used which entitled the company to payment on
meter measurement, of a sum per month equal to, or in excess
of the so-called minimum charge, the customer pays only for the
light he has actually had; so that this fixed charge becomes prac-
tically operative only where his consumption falls below the
extent of the use which it measures. I can see nothing unreason-
able in this, when the service, as I have defined it, which the
company is obliged to render, is considered."20
§ 20. Tennessee Supreme Court.
"We do not think it can be reasonably contended that it is not
competent to charge a minimum rate. We think it clear from
the authorities that the company had a right to fix a fair and
reasonable minimum charge for water supplied to any particular
residence."21
§21. Kansas Supreme Court.
December 9, 1911.
"The council evidently deemed it proper and reasonable to
collect 50^ a month from each patron, whether he used gas
amounting to that sum during the month or not, on the theory
that the minimum sum would pay for reading meters and other
services performed by the city in connection with the services,
although the amount of gas used in one month might not entitle
the city to this sum. ....
20 60 N. Y. Supp. 559. Gould v. Kdison Elec. Ilium. Co. of New York.
21 Tenn. Chancery Case No. 8368 — Chavaunes v. Knoxville W. Co. — Affirmed by State
Supreme Court but not Reported.
14
"The regulation being one contained in an ordinance, it is
presumptively reasonable until the contrary is shown, or unless it
is unreasonable or discriminatory on its face, . . . and it
not appearing prima facie unreasonable, but reasonable, it must
. be upheld."2"
§ 22. Arizona Supreme Court.
February 18, 1914.
A recent session of the Arizona Legislature provided by statute
"that gas, electricity and water measured through a meter would
be charged for according to the exact amount used, and that no
other charge should be made."
This statutory limitation, however, did not meet with the
approval of the commission, and the question was raised as to
whether a Public Service Corporation could establish and collect
a minimum rate notwithstanding the legislative expression to the
contrary. The State Supreme Court of Arizona23 held the pre-
ceding satute unconstitutional and affirmed the Arizona Corpora-
tion Commission's power to make and enforce a minimum charge
in the face of the unconstitutional statute.
The Court held under the unusually broad provisions of the
Arizona State Constitution that "the functions of the corpora-
tion commission are neither legislative, executive nor judicial,
but its duties and powers pervade them all, and it is in fact
another department of government ; and where it is given exclu-
sive power it is supreme." 24
-- 119 Pac. Rep. 317. Cunningham et al. v. City of Tola et al.
-3 138 Pacific 781. State v. Tucson Electric L,ight & Power Co.
-'•* 138 Pacific 781. State v. Tucson Electric lyight & Power Co.
PART II.
ADJUDICATED MONTHLY MONETARY ALLOWANCES
FOR MINIMUM CHARGES.
§ 23. Arizona Corporation Commission. Electric Utilities.
Municipal League of Phoenix v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., 4 R. S.,.
p. 40.
Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power i.oo
I. E. Huffman, Mayor, v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.,
4 R. S., p. 24.
Electric Lighting I.oo
Electric Power-^-2 h. p. or less 1.50
and 75^ for each additional h. p.
International Gas Co. Matter, 6 R. S., p. 69.
Electric Lighting 1 .00
Electric Power — 2 h. p. or less 1.50
and 75^ for each additional h. p.
Schwartz v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., P. U. R. 1915 B, p. 280.
Electric Service i:OO
Butler v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power Co., P. U. R. 1915 A,
P. 573-
Electric Power for X-Ray Machine 3.00
Pacific Gas & Electric Co., P. U. R. 1915 F, p. 925.
Electric Service 1.50
G. W. M. Carvel, Mayor, ct al. v. Globe Light & Power Co., Docket 92.*
Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — i h. p. or less i.oo
and 50^ for each additional h. p.
South Side Gas & Electric Co., Docket 89.*
Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — I h. p. or less i.oo
and $1.00 for each additional h. p.
§ 24. Arizona Corporation Commission. Gas Utilities.
Schwartz v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., P. U. R. 1915" B, p. 280.
Domestic Gas Service $0.50
In re Pacific Gas & Electric Co., P. U. R. 1915 F, p. 925.
Domestic Gas Service i.oo
In re Douglas Gas Corporation, P. U. R. 1915 E, p. 1067.
Domestic Gas Service 75
i6
Municipal League of Phoenix v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., Docket I.*
Domestic Gas Service $0.50
I. A. Huffman, Mayor, et al. v. Tucson Gas, Electric Light & Power
Co., Docket 4.*
Domestic Gas Service 50
South Side Gas & Electric Co., Docket 89, Sub. i.*
Domestic Gas Service i.oo
G. W. M. Carvel, Mayor, et al. v. Globe Light & Power Co., Docket 92 *
Domestic Gas Service i.oo
§ 25. Arizona Corporation Commission. Water Utilities.
Geo. W. Frazer, Mayor, et al. v. Clifton Water & Improvement Co.,
Docket 15.*
Water Service $1.00
Bisbee-Naco Water Co., Docket 16.*
Water Service i.oo
The Morenci Water Co., Docket 37.*
Water Service 1 .60
Granite Springs Water Co., Docket 69, Sub. I.*
Water Service 1.50
John Towner, Docket 187.*
Water Service 2.00
§ 26. California Railroad Commission. Electric Utilities.
Thomas Monahan, Mayor of San Jose, v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.,
6 R. S., p. 8.
Electric Lighting $1.00
Solari v. Tuolumne Co. Electric Power & Light Co., 4 R. S., p. 26.
Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — per h. p. i.oo
Northern California Power Co. Rate Schedule, 3 R. S., p. 271.
Electric Lighting i .00
Mt. Whitney Power & Electric Co., 2 R. S., p. 239.
Electric Service 2.00
(On basis of annual minimum charge of $24.00)
Antioch v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., 5 R. S., p. 270.
Electric Lighting i .00
Electric Power — per h. p. for first 10 h. p i.oo
and 75# for each additional h. p.
Faukner v. Ventura County Power Co. Rate Matter, 8 R. S., p. 385.
Electric Power — per h. p i.oo
17
East Bakersfield Improvement Association v. San Joaquin L. & P.
Corp., P. U. R. 1916 C, p. 833.
Electric Lighting $0.75
§ 27. California Railroad Commission. Gas Utilities.
West Coast Gas Co. Rate Matter, 6 R. S., p. 58.
Gas Service $1.00
Sirard v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co'., P. U. R. 1915 E, p. 1067.
Gas Service 50
§ 28. California Railroad Commission. Water Utilities.
In re Murphy Water, Ice & Light Co., P. U. R. 1916 B, p. 729.
y\" meter or smaller $1.25
i" meter 2.50
i y2" meter 3.50
2" meter 4.50
2/2" meter '. 5.50
3" meter 6.50
Larger meters in proportion
In re \Vadley, P. U. R. 1915 F, p. 928.
Water Service 1.20
In re Downey Land Improvement Asso., P. U. R. 1915 F, p. 928.
Water Service i.oo
In re North Sacramento Light & Water Co., P. U. R. 1915 F, p. 928.
Water Service .- i.oo
Town of Hollister v. Hollister Water Co., P. U. R. 1915 D, p. 626.
Water Service 1.25
In re San Jose Water Co., P. U. R. 1915 E, p. 716.
\\rater Service 90
§ 29. Colorado Public Utilities Commission. Electric Utilities.
City of Florence v. Arkansas Valley Electric Co., 7 R. S., p. 196.
Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power — per h. p i.oo
In re Colorado Springs Light, Heat & Power Co., P. U. R. 1916 A,
p. 891.
Electric Lighting — Residence i.oo
Electric Lighting — Commercial per k. w. connected load., i.oo
Electric Power — 2 h. p. or less 1.50
and 75^ for each additional h. p.
i8
Citizens of Lajunta v. Arkansas Valley R. L. & P. Co., R. S., p. 69.
Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power — per h. p i.oo
§ 30. Colorado Public Utilities Commission. Gas Utilities.
Colorado Springs Light, Heat & Power Co., Dec. 15, 1915.*
Gas Service $0.50
§31. Connecticut Public Utilities Commission. Gas Utilities.
In re Residents of Maple Hill, P. U. R. 1916 B, p. 312.
Gas Service $1.25
(Based on minimum charge of $15.00 per annum)
§ 32. Connecticut Public Utilities Commission. Water Utilities.
In re Plainville Water Co. Rate Matter, Dec. 3, 1912.*
Water Service $0.83^
(Based on minimum charge of $2.50 per quarter)
In re petition of Oscar & Odastrom et al. for Water Extensions, Oct.
15, 1914.*
Water Service i.oo
In re Springdale Water Co. Rates, Feb. 17, 1915.*
Water Service 1.66^3
(Based on minimum charge of $20.00 per annum)
§ 33- Georgia Railroad Commission. Electric Utilities.
Macon Railway & Light Co. Rate Matter, 4 R. S., p. 369.
Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power — 2 h. p. or less i.oo
and 50^ per h. p. for each additional h. p.
§ 34. Idaho Public Utilities Commission. Electric Utilities.
In re Idaho Light & Power Co., Jan. 16, 1915, P. U. R. 1915 A, p. 19.
Electric Lighting $i .00
In re Investigation of Rates Now Charged by Certain Electrical Corp.,
Feb. 27, 1915, 6 R. S., p. 388.
Electric Lighting i.oo
Taylor v. Northwest Light & Water Co., Nov. 13, 1915, P. U. R. 1916
A, p. 397-
Electric Lighting 1 .00
Electric Power — per h. p. of maximum demand i.oo
19
§ 35- Idaho Public Utilities Commission. Water Utilities.
City of Sandpoint v. Sandpoint Water & Light Co., Oct. 2, 1915,
P. U. R. 1915 F, p. 472.
Water Service— ^" Meter $1.00
34" Meter 1.50
i" Meter 2.50
i%" Meter 3-25
V/?" Meter 4-SO
11/4" Meter 7.50
2" Meter or larger 10.00
§ 36. Illinois Public Utilities Commission. Electric Utilities.
Western United Gas £ Electric Rate Matter, 5 R. $., p. 115.
Electric Lighting $0.50
Electric Power 3.00
Monmouth Public Service Co. Rate Schedule, 6 R. S., p. 3.
Electric Lighting 50
In re South Beloit Water, Gas & Electric Co., P. U. R. 1915 E, p. 335.
Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 1.25
Commonwealth Edison Rate Schedule, 9 R. S., p. 118.
Electric Service 50
§ 37. Illinois Public Utilities Commission. Gas Utilities.
In re Oblong Gas Co., P. U. R. 1915 A, p. 598.
Gas Service $0.50
City of Belleville v. St. Claire County Gas & Electric Co., P. U. R.
1915 F, p. 238.
Gas Service 50
Springfield v. Springfield Gas & Electric Co., March 9, 1916.*
Gas Service 50
§ 38. Illinois Public Utilities Commission. Water Utilities.
City of Lake Forest v. Lake Forest Water Co., P. U. R. 1915 D,
p. 1023.
Water Service $0.50
(Based on minimum charge of $6.00 per annum)
20
§ 39- Indiana Public Service Commission. Electric Utilities.
Moore v. Merchants Heat & Light Co., P. U. R. 1916 B, p. 513.
Electric Lighting $0.50
Electric Power — 2 h. p. or less i.oo
and 50^ per h. p. for each additional h. p.
Peck v. Indianapolis Light & Heat Co., P. U. R. 1916 B, p. 489.
Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power — 2 h. p. or less i.oo
and 50^ per h. p. for each additional h. p.
U. G. & E. Co., New Albany.*
Electric Lighting 55
Oakland City Electric Light Co.*
Electric Lighting 50
Indiana & Michigan Electrical Co., So. Bend.*
Electric Lighting 85
Indiana & Michigan Electric Co., Elkhart.*
Electric Service 85
General Service Co., Lafayette.*
Electric Service 50
Bicknell Light, Heat & Power Co.*
Electric Service 50
No. Manchester, Browne-Mills E. Co.*
Electric Service 50
§ 40. Indiana Public Service Commission. Artificial Gas Utilities.
Evansville Public Service Co.*
Gas Service $0.50
Interstate P. S. Co.*
Gas Service > 50
§ 41. Indiana Public Service Commission. Natural Gas Utilities.
Central Indiana Gas Co., Hartford City.*
Gas Service $0.70
Central Indiana Gas Co., Marion.*
Gas Service 70
Central Indiana Gas Co., Anderson.*
Gas Service 70
Central Indiana Gas Co., Alexandria.* •
Gas Service 70
21
Central Indiana Gas Co., Muncie.*
Gas Service $0.70
Indiana Gas Light Co., Noblesville.*
Gas Service 75
Indiana Gas Light Co., Tipton.*
Gas Service , 75
Middletown Gas Co., Middletown.*
Gas Service i.oo
Union Heat, Light & Power Co., P. U. R. 1915 E, p. 1067.
Gas Service i.oo
§ 42. Indiana Public Service Commission. Water Utilities.
Apple v. City of Brazil, P. U. R. 1915 C, p. 585.
Water Service— $i" Meter $0.40
- y4" Meter 50
i" Meter 75
1 1/2" Meter i.oo
2" Meter 2.00
3" Meter 3.00
4" Meter 4.00
6" Meter 5.00
. In re Owensville Water, Light, Power & Heat Co., P. U. R. 1915 A,
p. 1007.
Water Service 50
Commercial Club of Terre Haute v. Terre Haute Water Works Co.,
P. U. R. 1916 B, p. 213.
Water Service— */%' and 1/4" Meters i.oo
i" Meter 2.00
2" Meter 5.00
3" Meter 10.00
4" Meter 20.00
Greencastle Water Works Co.*
Water Service 50
Vincennes Water Supply Co.*
Water Service 50
Lebanon Water Works.*
Water Service 75
Princeton Water & Lighting Co.*
Water Service 75
Fortville Water Works.*
Water Service 50
2
22
§ 43- Kansas Public Utilities Commission. Electric Utilities.
Parsons Railway & Light Co. Rate Schedule, 2 R. S., p. 349-
Electric Lighting $0.75
Electric Power — per h. p 50
Fort Scott Gas & Electric Co. v. Fort Scott, P. U. R. 1915 B, p. 507.
Electric Lighting i.oo
§ 44. Kansas Public Utilities Commission. Natural Gas Utilities.
Landon v. City of Lawrence, P. U. R. 1916 B, p. 332.
Gas Service $0.50
§ 45. Kansas Public Utilities Commission. Water Utilities.
City of Leavenworth v. Leavenworth City & Ft. Leavenworth Water
Co., P. U. R. 1915 B, p. 613.
Water Service $0.50
§ 46. Manila Board of Public Utility Commissioners.
Moffat v. Manila Board of Public Utility & Electric Light Commis-
sioners, 6 R. S., p. 279.
Electric Lighting $1.00
§ 47. Maryland Public Service Commission. Electric Utilities.
Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Co. Rate Investigation,*
June 25, 1913.
Electric Lighting $l.oo
"Provided that if, on any first day of May, or at any
established adjustment period it shall appear that
by reason of said charge paid or become liable to
pay during the year immediately preceding an
amount exceeding the $12.00 per year per meter,
the company shall refund such excess."
§ 48. Maryland Public Service Commission. Gas Utilities.
Consolidated Gas, Electric Light & Power Rate Schedule, 3 R. S.,
p. 109.
Gas Service . $1.00
23
§ 49- Maryland Public Service Commission, Water Utilities.
Suburban Water Co. Rate Increase,* Oct. 14, 1914.
\Yater Service —
House without Bath Room $0.83^
House with Bath Room 1.25
(Based on minimum charge of $2.50 and $3.75
per quarter)
Potee v. Brooklyn & Curtis Bay Light & Water Co.,* Jan. 5, 1915.
\Yater Service —
5/s" Meter, Quarterly Charge $2.50 0.83^
1/4" Meter, Quarterly Charge 3.50
i" Meter, Quarterly Charge 5.00
iY2" Meter, Quarterly Charge 10.00 3-33^3
2" Meter, Quarterly Charge 13.00 4-33^
In re Washington County Water Co., P. U. R. 1916 A, p. 508.
Water Service — Based on annual rental value of houses,
as follows :
Annual Rental Value Quarterly
of House Charge
$100.00 $1.00 Q.33H
100.00 to $150.00 1.50 50
150.00 to 200.00 2.00 66^<3
200.00 and up 2.50 83^
§ 50. Massachusetts Gas and Electric Light Commission. Elec-
tric Utilities.
The Commission in the Boston Edison Company minimum monthly
charge matter, under date of Nov. 18, 1909, as reported on page 40 of the
Commission's 1910 Report, approved a minimum charge of $1.00 per month
for electric service.
§51. Massachusetts Gas and Electric Light Commission. Gas
Utilities.
The Commission, on page 22 of its 1912 Report, in the North Adams
Gas Company matter, approved the use of the minimum charge.
§ 52. Missouri Public Service Commission. Electric Utilities.
Brown v. Lawrence Co. Water, Light & Cold Storage Co., I Mo.
P. S. C., p. 355-
Electric Lighting — Basis of $2 per quarter $0.66^
24
Weaver v. Kirkersville Light, Power & Ice Co., I Mo. P. S. C., p. 225.
Electric Lighting — Residence $0.75
Electric Lighting — Business — Basis of 5^ for each 6o-watt
lamp, but not less than i.oo
Electric Power — per k. w. connected load i.oo
McGregor-Noe v. Springfield G. & E. Co., I Mo. P. S. C., p. 468.
Electric Lighting — Residence 75-
Electric Lighting — Business — Basis of 5^ for each 6o-watt
lamp, but not less than i.oo
Electric Power — per k. w. connected load 75
Meek v. Consumers Electric Light & Power Co., P. U. R. 1915 A,
p. 958.
Electric Lighting 75
City of Mexico v. Mexico Power Co., P. U. R. 1915 B, p. 908.
Electric Lighting — Residence 75
Electric Lighting — Business i.oo
Commercial Club of Charleston v. Missouri Public Service Commis-
sion, 7 R. S., p. 233.
Electric Lighting — Residence 75
Electric Lighting — Commercial i.oo
Ft. Scott & Nevada Light, Heat, Water & Power Co., P. U. R. 1915 F,
p. 546.
Electric Lighting — Residence 75
Electric Power — Per h. p. up to first 15 h. p i.oo
Second 15 h. p. 75^ each and all in excess of 30 h. p. at
5orf per h. p.
Kramer v. St. Joseph Ry., Light, Heat & Power Co., 3 Mo. P. S. C.,
p. 403.
Electric Lighting 50
§ 53. Missouri Public Service Commission. Gas Utilities.
City of Columbia v. Watts Engineering Co., 2 Mo. P. S. C., p. 190.
Gas Service $0.75
§ 54. Missouri Public Service Commission. Water Utilities.
Calvert v. Clinton Light & Water Co., I Mo. P. S. C., p. 191.
Water Service $0.50
Cole v. Ft. Scott & Nevada Light, Heat & P. Co., i Mo. P. S. C.,
p. 130.
Water Service — Domestic 50
Water Service — Business . i.oo
25
Brown v. Lawrence Co. Water, Light & Cold Storage Co., I Mo.
P. S. C., p. 355-
Water Service— Yz" Meter $0.50
H" Meter 50
K" Meter .75
i" Meter 1.25
Willow Springs v. Light, Power & Mfg. Co., 2 Mo. P. S. C., p. 48.
Water Service — Domestic 75
Water Service — Business i.oo
§ 55. Montana Public Service Commission. Hlectric Utilities.
Helena Light & Railway Co. Rate Matter, 4 R. S., p. 179.
Electric Lighting $1.00
City of Philipsburg v. Montana Power Co., P. U. R. 1915 B, p. 384.
Electric Lighting 2.00
§ 56. Nevada Public Service Commission. Hlectric Utilities.
Public Service Commission of Nevada v. Nevada-California Power
Co., Tan. 29, 1914.*
Electric Lighting $1.50
Electric Power 1.50
(Based on 25^ per connected h. p. of motors)
City of Ely v. Ely Light & Power Co., 4 R. S., p. 215.
Electric Lighting 1.50
Pacific Power Co. Rate Schedule, 5 R. S., p. 179.
Electric Lighting 2.00
Electric Cooking and Heating 3.00
Truckee River General Electric Co. Rate Matter, 5 R. S., p. 249.
Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — Per rated h. p i.io
§ 57. New Jersey Board of Public Utility Commissioners. Hlec-
tric Utilities.
In re New Egypt Light, Heat, Power & Water Co., P. U. R. 1915 D,
p. 823.
Electric Energy — On measured light, power, and combina-
tion light and power services, a minimum monthly
charge for use of line service and equipment, per
plant or installation for equipments as stated below,
or their respective equivalents in electric energy
demands, will be made as follows :
26
No. of 25-\vatt lamps Maximum demand
or their equivalent in watts per hour
Under 5 lamps 100 watts $1.00
5 to 9 inclusive. 225 watts 1.25
10 to 15 inclusive 375 watts 1.50
16 to 24 inclusive 600 watts 1.75
25 and above above 600 watts 2.00
Electric Power — per h. p. of motor i.oo
Public Service Electric Co. Complaint, 6 R. $., 277.
Electric Power — per h. p i.oo
The Rockland Electric Co. New Schedule of Rates, June 14, 1915.*
Electric Energy i.oo
§ 58. New Jersey Board of Public Utility Commissioners. Gas
Utilities.
In re Consolidated Gas Co. Rates at Long Branch, i N. J. P. S. C.,
p. 24.
Gas Service $0.25
In re Wildwood, Anglesea & Holly Beach Gas Co., P. U. R. 1915 A,
P- 343-
Gas Service 0.75
In re Wildwood Gas Co., P. U. R. 1916 B, p. 818.
Gas Service 75
§ 59. New Jersey Public Utility Commission. Water Utilities.
Chalmers v. Wildwood W'ater Works, I N. J. P. S. C., p. 162.
Water Service — Based on annual charge of $8.00 So.66^
In re Acquackanonk Water Co. Minimum Charge Matter, I N. J.
P. S. C., p. 419.
Water Service — Based on quarterly charge of $3.00 i.oo
§ 60. New Hampshire Public Service Commission. Gas Utilities.
Pilsbury et al. v. Peoples Gas Light Co., 4 N. H. P. S. C., p. 446.
Gas Service — 3 or 5-light meter $0.30
lo-light meter 40
2O-light and over 50
27
§61. New York Public Service Commission, Second District.
Electric Utilities.
Buffalo General Electric Co. Rate Schedule, 8 R. S., p. 147.
Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power — First 2 h. p. or less i.oo
and 50^ for each additional h. p.
§ 62. New York Public Service Commission, Second District.
Natural Gas Utilities.
Le Roy Minimum Charge Matter, P. U. R. 1916, p. 132.
"A service charge of 50 cents per month will be made against
each consumer unless his net bill for gas consumed during the
month shall equal or exceed 50 cents. The monthly service charge
will cover all gas furnished during the period for which such
charge is made.''
Although the Commission called this a "service charge," the
last sentence in the quotation makes it a "minimum charge" in
accordance with the definition in § 4 herein.
§ 63. Ohio Public Utilities Commission. Electric Utilities.
In re Bucyrus Light & Power Co. Electric Rate Case.*
Electric Lighting — Residence $0.50
Electric Lighting — Commercial 50
Electric Lighting — Sign and Window 2.00
Electric Power — 5 h. p. or less : i.oo
and 20^ per h. p. for each additional h. p.
Break-Down Service — Per k. \\. connected, load 3.00
§ 64. Oklahoma Corporation Commission. Electric Utilities.
J. I. Case Plow Works v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., Mar. 17, 1915.*
Electric Power — First h. p. $1.00 plus 50^ for each addi-
tional h. p $1.00
Plansifter Milling Co. v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., P. U. R.
1016 A, p. 210.
Electric Lighting i.oo
§ 65. Oregon Public Service Commission. Electric Utilities.
City of Bend v. Bend Water, Light & Power Co., P. U. R. 1915 F,
p. 920.
Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power — Per h. p i.oo
28
Campbell v. Hood River Gas & Electric Co., P. U. R. 1915 D, p. 907.
Electric Service in city $1.00
Electric Service outside of city 1.25
LaGrande Commercial Club v. Eastern Oregon Light & Power Co..
7 R. S., p. 344-
Electric Service 1 .00
§ 66. Oregon Public Service Commission. Water Utilities.
City of Bend v. Bend Water, Light & Power Co., P. U. R. 1915 F,
P- 923-
Water Service— ft" Meter $1.60
y±" Meter 2.00
i" Meter 3.00
i yz" Meter 4.50
2" Meter 8.00
3" Meter 13.50
4" Meter 21.00
§ 67. Pennsylvania Public Service Commission. Electric Utilities.
Jas. Thompson & M. A. Hanna & Co. v. Erie Co. Electric Co., 6 R. S.,
p. 125.
Electric Power— Up to 7*/2 h. p $15.00
Cauffiel v. Citizens Light, Heat & Power Co. of Johnstown, 6 R. S.,
p. 167.
Electric Lighting i.oo
Philadelphia Electric Co., 9 R. S., p. 84.
Electric Lighting — Residence 75
Electric Lighting — Retail Service i.oo
Electric Power — 50^ per h. p i.oo
Harrisburg (Pa.) Light & Power Co., 2 R. S., p. 79-
Electric Lighting i.oo
People's Incandescent Light Co., Meadville, Pa., 4 R. S., p. 325.
Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — $1.00 per k. w. demand 2.00
Norristown, Pa., Counties Gas & Elec. Co., 4 R. S., p. 289.
Electric Lighting 1.50
Electric Power — $1.00 per h. p 2.00
29
§ 68. Pennsylvania Public Service Commission. Water Utilities.
Newcastle Box Co. v. City of Newcastle Water Co., P. U. R. 1916 C,
p. 106.
Water Service — Based on minimum charge of $5.00 per
annum $0.41^
§ 69. Vermont Public Service Commission. Electric Utilities.
Citizens St. Albans v. Vermont Power & Mfg. Co., Jan. 27, 1915.*
Electric Lighting — I k. w. capacity $0.50
Each additional k. w. capacity 50^ additional.
§ 70. Washington Public Service Commission. Electric Utilities.
Pacific Power & Light Co. Rate Matter, 8 R. S., p. 261.
Electric Lighting $0.75
§71. Washington Public Service Commission. Water Utilities.
City of Bremmerton v. Garrison- Fisher Co., P. U. R. 1915 C, p. 597.
Water Service $1.00
§ 72. West Virginia Public Service Commission. Electric Utilities.
In re City of Wellsburg v. Tristate Railroad & Electric Co., Feb.
21, 1916.*
Electric Lighting — Residence $0.50
Electric Lighting — Commercial — 10^ for each 50 watts of
active connected load
Sign and Window Lighting i.oo
City of Wellsburg v. Wellsburg Electric Light, Heat & Power Co.
Rate Complaint, 9 R. S., p. 41.
Electric Lighting 50
§ 73. West Virginia Public Service Commission. Water Utilities.
Thorn v. Montgomery Light & "Water Co., Feb. 29, 1916.*
Water Service ' $0.75
In re Charlestown Water Co. Rate Increase, Feb. 18, 1916.*
Water Service — Based on annual charge of $7.00 58^3
§ 74. Wisconsin Railroad Commission. Electric Utilities.
In re Application Merrill Ry. & Lt. Co., 2 W. R. C., p. 168.
Electric Lighting $1.00
30
In re Application Chippewa Valley Ry., Lt. & Power Co., 2 W. R. C.,
p. 326.
Electric Lighting $1.00
In re Application Medford Lt. & Heating Co., 2 W. R. C., p. 422.
Electric Service — Up to 30,000 watts i.oo
30,000 to 50,000 watts 3.00
More than 50,000 watts 4.00
In re Application Chetek Lt. & Power Co., 2 W. R. C., p. 670.
Electric Lighting i.oo
In re Application Chippewa Valley Ry., Lt. & Power Co., 2 \Y. R. C.,
p. 771.
Electric Lighting 1 .00
In re Application Stoughton Municipal Electric Light System, 3 W.
R. C., p. 499-
Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power — Per h. p i.oo
In re Menominee & Marinette Lt. & Traction Co., 3 W. R. C., p. 904.
Electric Lighting i .00
In re Milwaukee Lt. & Power Co., 4 W. R. C., p. oo.
Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i .00
In re Cumberland Municipal Lighting Plant, 4 W. R. C., p. 230.
Electric Lighting 75
State Journal Printing Co. v. Madison Gas & Electric Co., 4 W. R. C.,
p. 748.
Electric Lighting .' i.oo
Electric Power 1.50
In re Waupaca Electric Lt. & Ry. Co., 5 W. R. C., p. 190.
Electric Lighting 75
City of Manitowoc v. Manitowoc Elec. Lt. Co., 5 W. R. C., p. 300.
Electric Lighting 50
In re Jeffrey Municipal Electric Lt. & Water Plant, 5 W. R. C., p. 586.
Electric Lighting 50
In re Lancaster Electric Lt. Co. Rate Increase, 6 W. R. C., p. 59.
Electric Lighting 75
In re Greenwood Municipal Lt. Plant Rate Increase, 6 W. R. C., p. 63.
Electric Lighting 40
In re Durand Lt. & Power Co. Rate Increase, 6 W. R. C., p. 352.
Electric Lighting 75
Bloomer Electric Light Plant Rate Increase, 6 W. R. C., p. 512.
Electric Lighting $0.50 .
Electric Power — Per h. p i.oo
Red Cedar Valley Electric Co. Rate Increase, 6 W. R. C., p. 765.
Electric Power — Per h. p i.oo
In re Madison Gas & Electric Co. Rates, 7 W. R. C., p. 169.
Electric Lighting i.oo
City of Beloit v. Beloit Water, Gas & Electric Co., 7 W. R. C., p. 381.
Electric Service i.oo
Electric Theatre v. Lodi Elec. Light Plant, 7 W. R. C., p. 754.
Electric Lighting 50
City of Rhinelander v. Rhinelander Ltg. Co., 9 W. R. C., p. 438.
Electric Lighting — Commercial i.oo
In re Application of Village of Whitehall for Rate Increase in
Municipal Plant, 9 W. R. C., p. 481.
Electric Current 75
In re Investigation of Various Electric Rates in the City of Mil-
waukee, 9 W. R. C., p. 572.
Electric Service — Commercial i.oo
Electric. Power — 2 h. p. or less 1.50
and 75^ per h. p. for each additional h. p.
Chippewa Valley R. L. & P. Co. Electric Rates, 10 W. R. C., p. 703.
Electric Service i.oo
Superior Commercial Club v. Superior W. L. & P. Co., 10 W. R. C.,
p. 807.
Commercial Electric Service — 5^ net for each 5O-watt unit.
Electric Lighting — Sign and Outside per 100 watts 35
Electric Heating and Cooking — Per kilowatt i.oo
Window, Show Case, and Basement Salesroom Light-
ing— Per 100 watts 30
In re Investigation Evansville Municipal Elec. Lt. & Water Plant,
ii W. R. C., p. 214.
Commercial Electric Lighting 75
In re Arcadia E. L. £ W. Plant, n \V. R. C., p. 226.
Commercial Electric Lighting 75
In re Chetek Light & Power Co. Rate Increase, n W. R. C., p. 235.
Commercial Electric Lighting 85
In re Monticello Electric Light Co. Rate Increase, 11 W. R. C., p. 266.
Electric Service 50
In re Application Water & Light Commission of the City of Colum-
bus, n W. R. C., p. 473.
Commercial Electric Lighting 50
32
City of Green Bay v. Green Bay Gas & Elec. Co., 12 W. R. C., p. 334.
Electric Energy $1.00
H. G. Douglas v. Equitable Elec. Lt. Co., 12 W. R. C., p. 356.
Electric Energy — Under I kilowatt 60
From i to 2 kilowatts 80
From 2 to 5 kilowatts. 1.25
Over 5 kilowatts 2.25
Commercial Power — Per active h. p 75
In re Chippewa Valley Ry., Lt. & Power Co. Rate Increase, 12 W.
R. C., p. 549-
Electric Energy 1 .00
In re Oconto Electric Co. Rate Investigation, 12 W. R. C., p. 601.
Electric Energy 90 .
In re Chippewa Valley Ry., Lt. & Power Co. Rate Matter, 13 W. R. C.,
p. 22.
Electric Energy i.oo
In re Neshkoro Light & Power Co. Rate Increase, 13 W. R. C., p. 67.
Electric Energy i.oo
City of Waukesha v. Waukesha Gas & Electric Co., 13 W. R. C.,
P- 134-
Electric Energy 75
In re Madison Gas & Electric Co. Rate Situation, 13 W. R. C., p. 267.
Electric Service , i.oo
In re Darlington Electric Light & Water Co. Rate Increase, 13 W.
R. C., p. 362.
Electric Service 1.50
In re City of Menasha Municipal Electric Light Plant Rate Increase,
13 W. R. C., p. 424.
Electric Service 50
Electric Power — Per h. p i.oo
In re Chippewa Valley Ry., Lt. & Power Co. Case in the City of Eau
Claire, 13 W. R. C., p. 447.
Electric Service i.oo
In re Mt. Horeb Heat, Light & Power Co., 13 W. R. C., p. 664.
Electric Energy i.oo
In re Mosinee Electric Light & Power Co. Rate Matter, 13 W. R. C.,
p. 824.
Electric Energy 50
Hood v. Monroe Electric Co., 14 W. R. C., p. 244.
Electric Service . i.oo
33
In re McGowan Water, Light & Power Co. Rate Increase, 14 W. R.
C., p. 328.
Electric Service $0.75
In re Stevens Point Lighting Co. Rate Increase, 14 W. R. C., p. 378.
Electric Energy 50
Electric Power— 2 h. p. or less 50
and 25^ for each additional h. p.
Douglas v. Equitable Electric Light Co., 14 W. R. C., p. 391.
Electric Lighting 60
Kittleson v. Elroy Municipal Water & Light Plant, 14 W. R. C.f p. 497.
Electric Service 50
In re Brownton Municipal Light Plant Rate Increase, 14 W. R. C.,
P. 567.
Electric Service 75
In re Richland Center Electric Light & Water Plant Rate Increase,
14 W. R. C., p. 593-
Electric Power— Per h. p 25
Jones v. Berlin Public Service Co., 15 W. R. C., p. 146.
Electric Service i.oo
In re Municipal Electricity Utility of Sun Prairie Rate Increase,
15 W. R. C., p. 198.
Electric Service 50
In re Manitowoc Municipal Water & Electric Light Plant Rate
Adjustment, 15 W. R. C., p. 216.
Electric Power — Per h. p. installed i.oo
In re United Heat, Light & Power Co. Adjustment, 15 W. R. C.,
P. 515.
Electric Service 75
In re Waterloo Municipal Water & Electric Light Plant Rate Adjust-
ment, 15 W. R. C., p. 549.
Electric Service 75
Charlesworth v. Omro Electric Light Co., 16 W. R. C., p. 35.
Electric Energy 75
In re Ladysmith Lighting Co. Rate Investigation, 16 W. R. C., p. 71.
Electric Lighting i.oo
In re Burlington Electric Light & Power Co., 16 W. R. C., p. 86.
Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power — 2 h. p. or less 1.50
and 75^ per h. p. for each additional h. p.
34
In re Brodhead Municipal Electric Utility Rate Increase, 16 W. R. C.,
p. i/o.
Electric Lighting $0.75
Electric Power — First h. p i.oo
and 5o<* per h. p. for each additional h. p.
In re Ft. Atkinson Water & Light Commission Rate Increase, 16 W.
R. C, p. 221.
Electric Lighting — Within city 60
Outside city 75
In re Milwaukee & Fox River Valley Ry. Co. Rate Adjustment, 16
W. R. C., p. 337-
Electric Service i.oo
Mathews v. Villa Light & Power Co., 16 W. R. C., p. 574.
Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power — First h. p 75
and 50^ for each additional h. p.
Bosshard v. Hussa Bros. Light & Water Co., 16 W. R. C., p. 631.
Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power — Per h. p 75
In re Bloomer Electric Light & Power Co. Rate Increase, 16 W. R. C.,
p. 772.
Electric Lighting 2.50
Electric Power 2.50
In re Starks Lighting & Mill Co. Minimum Charge Matter, 16 W. R.
C., p. 829.
Electric Lighting : 75
Herman Kreunen v. Cedar Grove Telephone Co., 17 W. R. C., p. 78.
Electric Power — First h. p i.oo
and 40$ for each additional h. p.
In re Village of Fennimore Municipal Light Plant Rate Increase,
17 W. R. C., p. 94.
Electric Lighting — Within village 75
Outside village i.oo
Kauffman v. Hillsboro Light & Power Co., 17 W. R. C., p. 389.
Electric Lighting 75
§ 75- Wisconsin Railroad Commission. Gas Utilities.
State Journal Printing Co. v. Madison Gas & Electric Co., 4 W. R. C.,
p. 748.
Gas Service $0.50
City of Ripon v. Ripon Light & Water Co., 5 W. R. C., p. 94.
Gas Service 50
35
In re Application Green Bay Gas & Electric Co., 5 W. R. C., p. 109.
Gas Service $0.40
City of Racine v. Racine Gas Lt Co., 6 W. R. C., p. 324.
Gas Service — 3-Light Meier 25
5-Light Meter 25
jo-Light Meter 35
20- Light Meter 35
30- Light Meter 50
45-Light Meter 60
oo-Light Meter i.oo
So-Light Meter 1.50
loo-Light Meter 2.00
2OO-Light Meter 4.00
City of Beloit v. Beloit Water, Gas £ Electric Co., 7 W. R. C., p. 381.
Gas Service — 3-Light Meter 25
5-Light Meter 25
io-Light Meter 35
2O-Light Meter 40
30- Light Meter 50
45-Light Meter 60
6o-Light Meter i.oo
So-Light Meter i.oo
loo- Light Meter 2.00
ISO-Light Meter 3.00
2OO-Light Meter 4.00
City of Neenah v. Wisconsin Traction L., H. & P. Co., 7 W. R. C,
p. 491.
Gas Service — 3-Light Meter 25
5-Light Meter 25
io-Light Meter 35
20- Light Meter 35
3O-Light Aleter 50
45-Light Meter 60
oo-Light Meter i.oo
So-Light Meter 1.50
loo-Light Meter 2.00
200- Light Meter 4.00
Lothrop v. Village of Sharon W. G. & El. Plant, 8 W. R. C., p. 495.
Gas Service — 3-Light Meter 50
5-Light Meter 65
36
J. C. Meyer v. Sheboygan G. Lt. Co., 9 W. R. C., p. 467.
Gas Service — 3-Light Meter $0.25
5-Light Meter 25
10- Light Meter 35
2O-Light Meter 50
45-Ught Meter 60
6o-Light Meter i.oo
So-Light Meter 1.50
loo-Light Meter 2.00
200- Light Meter 4.00
J. C. Meyer v. Sheboygan G. Lt. Co., 11 W. R. C., p. 317.
Gas Service — 3-Light Meter 25
5-Light Meter 25
io-Light Meter 35
2O-Light Meter 50
45-Light Meter 60
oo-Light Meter i.oo
So- Light Meter 1.50
ico- Light Meter 2.00
2OO-Light Meter 4.00
City of Green Bay v. Green Bay Gas & Electric Co., 12 W. R. C.
P- 334-
Gas Service 40
City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee G. Lt. Co., 12 W. R. C., p. 442.
Gas Service — 3, 5 or 10- Light Meter 27
20, 30, 45 or 60- Light Meter 54
So, loo or 150- Light Meter 1.08
200, 250 or 300- Light Meter 2.16
City of Waukesha v. Waukesha Gas & Electric Co., 13 W. R. C.
P- 135-
Gas Service — 3-Light Meter 40
5-Light Meter 40
io-Light Meter 50
20- Light Meter 60
30-Light Meter 70
45-Light Meter 85
6o-Light Meter i.oo
So-Light Meter 1.50
100- Light Meter 2.00
200- Light Meter 4.00
300- Light Meter 6.00
37
Louis F. Yanko v. Portage American Gas Co., 13 W. R. C., p. 144.
Gas Service— 3-Light Meter $0.25
5-Light Meter 25
lO-Light Meter 35
2O-Light Meter 50
45-Light Meter 65
6o-Light Meter i.oo
So-Light Meter 1.50
100- Light Meter 2.00
200- Light Meter 4.00
Jones v. Berlin Public Service Co., 15 W. R. C., p. 147.
Gas Service 50
§ 76. Wisconsin Railroad Commission. Water Utilities.
City of Ripon v. Rippn Light & Water Co., 5 W. R. C., p. 94.
Water Service —
y2" and s/s" Meters (Annual Charge $7.00) $0.58%
?4" Meter (Annual Charge 8.00) 66%
i" Meter (Annual Charge 9.00) .75
iy2" Meter (Annual Charge 10.00) 83 H
-2" Meter (Annual Charge 12.00) i.oo
In re Application Peoples Water, Light & Power Co., 10 W. R. C.,
p. 660.
Water Service 75
In re Village of Elkhart Lake Rate Adjustment, II W. R. C., p. 695.
Water Service —
$/s" Meter (Quarterly Charge $1.50) 50
34" Meter (Quarterly Charge 2.00) 66%
i" Meter (Quarterly Charge 2.50) 83^
1 54" Meter (Quarterly Charge 3.00) i.oo
il/2f Meter (Quarterly Charge 4.00) 1-33%
2" Meter (Quarterly Charge 5.00) 1.66%
3" Meter (Quarterly Charge 7.00) 2.335/3
4" Meter (Quarterly Charge 10.00) 3-33H
In re New Glarus L. & W. Plant Rate Increase, 11 W. R. C., p. 711.
Water Service —
s/s" Meter (Quarterly Charge $1.25) 41%
34" Meter (Quarterly Charge 1.50) 50
i" Meter (Quarterly Charge 2.00) 66%
i1/^" Meter (Quarterly Charge 2.50) 83%
2" Meter (Quarterly Charge 3.00) i.oo
3
33
In re Fehnimore Municipal Water & Light Plant Rate Increase, 12
W. R. C., p. 211.
Water Service —
s/s" Meter (Quarterly Charge $1.25) ............... $0.41%
?4" Meter (Quarterly Charge 1.50) ........... ..... 50
i" Meter (Quarterly Charge 2.00) ................ 66%
il/>" Meter (Quarterly Charge 2.50) ................ 83 H
2" Meter (Quarterly Charge 4.00) ............... i-33>3
City of Sparta Municipal Water Plant Rate Increase, 12 W. R. C.,
p. 546.
Water Service —
y$' Meter (Semi-annual Charge $2.75) ............. 455/6
y\' Meter (Semi-annual Charge 3.50) ............. 58^/3
i" Ateter (Semi-annual Charge 4.00) ............. 66%
iy2" Meter (Semi-annual Charge 5.00) ............. 83%
2" Meter (Semi-annual Charge 7.00) ............ 1.16%
3" Meter (Semi-annual Charge 9.00) ............ 1.50
4" Meter (Semi-annual Charge 12.00) ............ 2.00
In re Oconomowoc Municipal W:ater Plant Rate Increase, 14 W. R. C:,
P. 395-
Water Service — (Annual Charge $5.00)
Kittleson v. Elroy Municipal Water & Light Plant, 14 W. R. C., p. 496.
\Vater Service —
s/s" Meter (Quarterly Charge $1.25) ................ 41%
24" Meier (Quarterly Charge 1.50) ................ 50
i" Meter (Quarterly Charge 2.25) ................ 75
il/2" Meter (Quarterly Charge 3.75) . .-.- ............ 1.25
2" Meter (Quarterly Charge 5.25) ............... 1.75
In re Richland Center Electric Light & Water Plant Rate Increase,
14 W. R. C., p. 593-
Water Service — (Semi-annual Charge $2.50)
Dennett v. City of Sheboygan, 14 W. R. C., p. 650.
Water Service — ^2" and y&' Meter ...................... 40
Yi" Meter ............................. 50
i" Meter ............................ .80
i y\" Meter ............................. 90
\y*" Meter ............................ i.io
2" Meter ............................ 1.60
3" Aleter ............................ 2.45
4" Meter ............................ 4.20
6" Meter . 8.20
39
Hughes v. Water-town Water Works, 14 W. R. C., p. 688.
Water Service—
ft" Meter (Quarterly Charge $1.15) $0.38^
Yl" Meter (Quarterly Charge 1.50) 50
i" Meter (Quarterly Charge 2.00)
\y>" Meter (Quarterly Charge 2.50)
2" Meter (Quarterly Charge 4.00) i-33/<3
4" Meter (Quarterly Charge 9.00) 3.00
6" Meter (Quarterly Charge 16.00) 5-33l/3
In re Park Falls Municipal Water \Vorks Rate Increase, 15 W. R. C.,
p. 285.
Water Service 50
In re Light & W'ater Commission of the City of Barren, 16 W. R. C.,
P. 593-
Water Service —
y*' Meter (Quarterly Charge $1.50) . 50
24" Meter (Quarterly Charge 2.00) 66^
i" Meter (Quarterly Charge 2.50) 83^
il/2" Meter (Quarterly Charge 3.00) i.oo
2" Meter (Quarterly Charge 5.00) 1.66%
3" Meter (Quarterly Charge 10.00) 3-33/<3
4" Meter (Quarterly Charge 25.00) 8.33^
In re Prairie du Chien Municipal Water Plant, 17 W. R, C., p. 268.
Water Service —
y$r Meter (Quarterly Charge $1.50) 50
y±" Meter (Quarterly Charge 2.00) 662/3
i" Meter (Quarterly Charge 2.50) 83^
il/2* Meter (Quarterly Charge 3.00) i.oo
2" Meter (Quarterly Charge 4.00) 1-33^3
3" Meter (Quarterly Charge 6.25) 2.08^/3
4" Meier (Quarterly Charge 10.00) 3-33//3
6" Meter (Quarterly Charge 15.00) 5.00
Each additional consumer, Quarterly Charge $1.00. . .
PART III.
NON-ADJUDICATED MINIMUM CHARGES IN EXISTING
RATE SCHEDULES.
§ 77. Connecticut Public Utilities Commission. Electric Utili-
ties, Monthly Minimum Charges.
New London Gas & Electric Division of the Connecticut Power Co.,
3 R. S., p. 339-
Electric Lighting — Residence ........................... $1.00
Electric Lighting — Commercial per k. w. connected load.. 3.50
The United Illuminating Co., Bridgeport, Conn., 4 R. S., p. 337.
Electric Lighting
I OO
(Based on minimum charge of $12.00 per annum)
Electric. Power — J/2 h. p
I.OO
i h p
I 50
2 h. p
2 OO
3 h. p
2.5O
A ho
^ OO
c h p
4.OO
7l/2 h.p
10 h. D. .
. 4.00
and 50^ per h. p. per month for all over
10 h. p. installed.
§ 78. Massachusetts Gas and Electric Light Commission. Elec-
tric Utilities, Monthly Minimum Charges.
The following show the minimum charges in effect in Electric Sched-
ules under the Commission's supervision, taken from the Commission's
1915 Report. The figures at the left indicate the page number from which
the data were taken.
Private Companies
163 Abington & Rockland . . . Electric Lighting ............... $1.00
Electric Heating ................ i.oo
Electric Power ................. 1.50
164 Adams ................. Electric Power ................. i.oo
164 Agawam ............... Electric Lighting ... ............. 50
Electric Power — 3 h. p. or less. . . 1.50
164 Am. W. Co. (Maynard) . Electric Lighting ................ 75
164 Amesbury .............. Electric Lighting ............... i.oo
Electric Power . i.oo
41
164 Amherst Electric Lighting $0.50
Electric Power — 3 h. p. or less... 1.50
and 50^ for each additional
h.p.
165 Athol Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
165 Attleborough Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
165 Ayer Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
165 Beverly Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
165 Blackstone Electric Lighting (Adjusted on
yearly basis) i.oo
Electric Heating i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
166 Block Plant (Boston) . . . Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
167 Cambridge Electric Power i.oo
167 Cen. Mass Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
168 Charleston Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
168 Citizens (Nantucket) .... Electric Lighting i.oo
169 Clinton ; . . . Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
169 E. Hampton Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power 1.50
169 Edison-Boston Electric Lighting .75
170 Edison-Brockton Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
171 Fall River Electric Power 3.00
171 Fitchburg Electric Lighting 75
Electric Heating 2.00
Electric Power i.oo
172 Franklin Electric Lighting 50
Electric Heating i.oo
Electric Power 1.50
172 Gardner Electric Lighting 75
Electric Heating 75
Electric Power 50
42
172 Glouster Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power 2.50
173 Great Barrington Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 50
173 Greenfield Electric Lighting .50
Electric Power 1.50
173 Harvard Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
174 Haverhill Electric Lighting .- 75
Electric Heating 2.00
175 Lawrence Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
175 Lenox Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
175 Leominster Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
176 Lowell Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Heating 2.22
Electric Power i.oo
177 Lynn Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power 2.00
177 Maiden Electric Lighting 75
Electric Heating 2.00
Electric Power 1.50
178 Marion Electric Lighting i.oo
178 Marlborough Electric Lighting 75
179 Milford Electric Lighting 75
179 Mill River Electric Lighting 75
179 New Bedford Electric Lighting .75
Electric Power 1.50
179 Newburyport Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
180 No. Adams Electric Power i.oo
180 Northampton Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 2.50
180 North Brookfield Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
180 Norton Electric Lighting 1.25
Electric Power 1.50
43
181 Plymouth Electric Lighting $l.oo
Electric Power — per h. p i.oo
182 Quincy Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power . i.oo
182 Randolph Electric Lighting I.OO
Electric Power — per h. p i.oo
182 Salem Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power — per meter i.oo
(Total minimum charge shall
not exceed $24.00 per
year.)
182 Seekonk Electric Lighting (Minimum for
season $10.00) 83^3
Electric Heating 2.00
Electric Power i.oo
184 Shirley Electric Lighting 75
Electric Heating i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
184 Spencer Electric Lighting : 75
Electric Power i.oo
184 Stockbridge Electric Lighting i.oo
185 Suburban Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 1.50
185 Sunderland Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power 1.50
185 Tyngsboro Electric Lighting i.oo
186 United (Springfield) Electric Lighting (Yearly basis
$8.00) 66^
Electric Power (Yearly basis
$15-00) 1.25
186 Ware Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
186 Webster Electric Lighting 75
187 Wey mouth Electric Lighting ($6.00 Season
to Summer Customers) i.oo
187 Williamstown Electric Power — per h. p i.oo
187 Winchendon Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
188 Worcester Electric Lighting 75
Electric Heating 75
Electric Power . i.oo
44
i88 Worcester (Suburban) . . Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Heating 2.50
Electric Power i.oo
Municipal Plants
293 Ashburham Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 50
293 Belmont Electric Lighting i.oo
293 Boylston Electric Lighting i.oo
293 Braintree Electric Lighting 75
293 Chicopee Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
293 Concord Electric Lighting 75
Electric Heating 75
Electric Power i.oo
293 Danvers Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
294 Georgetown Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 60
294 Groton Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
294 Groveland Electric Lighting 75
294 Hingham Electric Lighting 50
Electric Heating i.oo
Electric Power —
(On yearly basis of $10.00) . . .83^3
(Summer residents $1.50 per
month.)
204 Holden Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
295 Holyoke Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power 50
295 Hudson Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
296 Ipswich Electric Lighting 50
296 Littleton Electric Lighting 75
296 Lunenburg Electric Lighting 75
296 Mansfield Electric Lighting 75
Electric Heating 75
Electric Power . i.oo
45
296 Marblehead Electric Lighting $0.50
Electric Heating i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
296 Merrimac Electric Lighting i.oo
297 Middleborough Electric Lighting i.oo
297 Middleton Electric Lighting i.oo
297 No. Attleborough Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power — per h. p i.oo
297 Norwood Electric Lighting i.oo
297 Paxton Electric Lighting i.oo
208 Peabody Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
208 Princeton Electric Lighting i.oo
208 Reading Electric Lighting 75
Electric Heating i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
298 Rowley Electric Lighting 75
298 Shrewsbury Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power 2.00
208 So. Hadley Electric Lighting 50
208 Sterling Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Heating i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
209 Taunton Electric Lighting 75
Electric Heating 75
Electric Power 75
299 Templeton Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
50^ for each additional meter
installed.
300 Wellesley Electric Lighting —
(Basis of $10.00 year) 83^/3
Electric Power —
(Basis of $10.00 year) 83^
46
§ 79- Massachusetts Gas and Electric Light Commission. Gas
Utilities, Monthly Minimum Charges.
The following shows the minimum charges in effect in Gas Schedules
under the Commission's supervision, taken from the Commission's 1915
Report. The figures at the left indicate the page number from which the
data were taken.
Private Companies
149 Amesbury Gas Service $0.50
149 Arlington Gas Servicef 50
149 Blackstone Gas Servicef 5°
150 Boston Consolidated Gas Servicef 5O
1 50 Brockton Gas Servicef 5°
150 Citizens Gas Servicef 50
150 Clinton Gas Servicef 5O
150 Dedham Gas Servicef 50
151 East Boston Gas Servicef 5O
151 Fitchburg Gas Service 25
151 Framingham Gas Service 50
151 Gardner Gas Service 40
151 Gloucester Gas Service 25
151 Greenfield Gas Service 50
151 Haverhill Gas Servicef 50
152 Hyannis Gas' Service 50
152 Leominster Gas Servicef 50
152 Lexington Gas Servicef 5O
153 Marlborough Gas Service 50
153 Natick Gas Service .50
153 New Bedford Gas Service^ 25
153 Newburyport Gas Service — Basis of $1.00 per
quarter 33 MJ
153 Newton Gas Servicef 5°
153 Northampton Gas Servicef 50
153 No. Attleborough Gas Service^ 50
154 . Norwood Gas Service 50
1 54 Old Colony Gas Servicef 5°
154 Otis Co Gas Service 25
f If bills average less for year.
I If customer has not used over $7 worth of gas during preceding 12 months.
47
154 Plymouth Gas Service $0.50
154 Salem Gas Service 25
154 Spencer Gas Servicef 50
155 Suburban Gas Service 25
155 Taunton Gas Service 25
155 Vineyard Haven Gas Service 50
155 Vineyard O. B Gas Service 50
155 Woburn Gas Service —
On 5-light meters 25
On larger meters 50
155 Worcester Co Gas Servicef 50
§ 80. Massachusetts Gas and Electric Light Commission. Water
Utilities, Annual Minimum Charges.
The following shows the annual minimum charge in effect in Water
Rate Schedules under the Commission's supervision, taken from the Com-
mission's 1915 Report. The figures at the left indicate the page number
from which the data were taken.
213 Amherst Water Service $8.00
213 Barnstable Water Service 12.00
213 Bridgewaters Water Service 20.00
214 Cohasset Water Service » 22.50
214 Cottage City Water Service 14.00
214 Dedham s Water Service 6.00
214 East Mountain Water Service 10.00
214 Edgartown . . . ; Water Service 16.00
214 Fairhaven Water Service 10.00
214 Granville Center Water Service 6.00
214 Groton Water Service 6.00
214 Hingham Water Service '. 8.00
214 Housatonic Water Service 18.00
215 Ludlow Water Service 6.00
215 Milf ord Water Service 12.00
215 Millbury Water Service 14.40
215 Northfield Water Service 9.00
215 Northfield Schools Water Service 12.00-
t If bills average less for year.
48
215 Norton Water Service $12.00
215 Oxford Water Service 10.00
215 Palmer — Water Service 10.00
215 Southbridge : Water Service 6.00
216 Wannacomet Water Service 6.00
216 Westf ord Water Service 10.00
216 Weston Water Service 18.00
§81. New York Public Service Commission Second District
Electric Utilities. Monthly Minimum Charges.
The following minimum charges, furnished by the Commission, are
in effect under its supervision. The data were taken from pages 69, 119,
163 and 223 of the Commission's Seventh Annual Report and given in
same order.
Private Companies
Buffalo Electric Lighting $1.00
Buffalo Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Lackawanna Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Blasdell Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power oo
Kenmore Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power oo
Williamsville Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power oo
Amherst Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Scotia Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
Ballston Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
Clifton Park Electric Lighting .50
Electric Power i.oo
Colonie Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
Glenville Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
Niskayuna Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power . i.oo
49
Rotterdam Electric Lighting $0.50
Electric Power i.oo
Yonkers Electric Power —
Retail Power Contract 3.00
Floral Park Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Great Neck Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Mineola Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Sea Cliff Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Hempstead Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Oyster Bay Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Baldwin Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Bayville Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Central Park Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
East Norwich Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
East Williston Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Garden City Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Glen Cove Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Hicksville Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Hyde Park Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Locust Valley Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Manhasset Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Port Washington Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
50
Roslyn Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power oo
Thomaston ' Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power oo
Westbury Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power oo
Niagara Falls Electric Lighting (B & N F E L
& P Co.— $2.00 for new
service) 75
Electric Power 75
Binghampton Electric Lighting i.io
Electric Power i.oo
Lestershire Electric Lighting i.io
Electric Power i.oo
Port Dickinson Electric Lighting i.io
Electric Power i.oo
Conklin Electric Lighting i.io
Electric Power i.oo
Union Electric Lighting i.io
Electric Power i.oo
No. Tonawanda Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.qo
Tonawanda Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Pendleton Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
\Yheatfield Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Fredonia Electric Lighting 1.25
Electric Power 1.25
Ithaca Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Amsterdam Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Canajoharie Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Fort Plain Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Nelliston Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power . i.oo
Palatine Bridge Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power i.oo
St. Johnsville Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Sharon Springs Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Manheim Electric Lighting i .00
Electric Power i.oo
Minden Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Palatine Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Batavia Electric Power i.oo
Oakfield Electric Power , i.oo
Alabama Electric Power i.oo
Newstead Electric Power i.oo
Amsterdam Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power — $2.00 on all inst.
over i h. p i.oo
Fort Johnson Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — $2.00 on all inst.
over i h. p i.oo
Fort Hunter Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — $2.00 on all inst.
over i h. p i.oo
Tribes Hill Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — $2.00 on all inst.
over i h. p i.oo
Amityville Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — 50^ per h. p i.oo
Northport Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — 50^ per h. p i.oo
Babylon Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — 50^ per h. p i.oo
Huntington Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — 50^ per h. p i.oo
Islip Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — 50^ per h. p i.oo
Oyster Bay Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — 50^ per h. p i.oo
52
Smithtown Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power — 50^ per h. p i.oo
Hillburn Electric Lighting —
Single-phase meter 75
Polyphase meter -. . . 1.50
Suffern Electric Lighting —
Single-phase meter 75
Polyphase meter 1.50
Ramapo Electric Lighting—
Single-phase meter 75
Polyphase meter 1.50
Tallman Electric Lighting —
Single-phase meter 75
Polyphase meter . 1.50
Jamestown Electric Lighting i.oo
Celoron Electric Lighting i.oo
Falconer Electric Lighting i.oo
Ellicott Electric Lighting i.oo
Cortland Electric Lighting 60
Electric Power i.oo
Homer «. . . Electric Lighting 60
Electric Power i.oo
McGrawville Electric Lighting 60
Electric Power i.oo
Cortlandville Electric Lighting 60
Electric Power i.oo
Preble Electric Lighting 60
Electric Power i.oo
Waverly Electric Lighting i.io
Electric Power i.oo
Fulton Electric Lighting-
Residential 90
Commercial 1.25
Electric Power-
Small Motors 1.20
Large Motors i.oo
Granby Electric Lighting —
Residential 90
Commercial 1.25
Electric Power —
Small Motors 1.20
Large Motors i.oo
53
Volney Electric Lighting —
Residential $0.90
Commercial 1.25
Electric Power —
Small Motors 1.20
Large Motors i.oo
Bloomingdale Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
.Saranac Lake Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
Black Brook Electric Lighting -. 75
Electric Power 75
Brighton Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
Franklin • Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
Harrietstown Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
North Elba Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
St. Armand Electric Lighting .75
Electric Power 75
Ausable Forks Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
Ogdensburg Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Olean Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Allegany Electric Lighting .' i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Nelliston Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power 50
Ephratah Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power 50
Chester Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
Monroe Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
Washingtonville Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
54
Blooming Grove Electric Lighting $0.75
Electric Power 75
Warwick Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
Woodbury Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
Florida Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
Harriman Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
Woodbury Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power 75
Canandaigua . , Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power oo
Manchester Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power oo
Shortsville Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power oo
Hopewell Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Carthage Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
West Carthage Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
Bellport Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power .• 2.00
Patchogue Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Brookhaven Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Bluepoint Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Centre Moriches . Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
East Moriches Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Eastport Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Moriches Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power . 2.00
55
Speonk Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power 2.00
Hornell Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Southampton Electric Power i.25f
East Quogue Electric Power i.25f
Good Ground Electric Power i.25f
Water Mill Electric Power i.25f
Victor Electric Lighting —
i to 50 i6-cp. lamps i.oo
51 to 100 i6-cp. lamps 2.00
Over loo i6-cp. lamps 3.00
Electric Power — to 20 h. p i.oo
Penfield Electric Lighting—
i to 50 i6-cp. lamps i.oo
51 to loo i6-cp. lamps 2.00
Over loo i6-cp. lamps 3.00
Electric Power — to 20 h. p i.oo
Perinton Electric Lighting —
i to 50 i6-cp. lamps i.oo
51 to loo i6-cp. lamps 2.00
Over 100 i6-cp. lamps 3.00
Electric Power — to 20 h. p i.oo
Pittsford Electric Lighting—
i to 50 i6-cp. lamps i.oo
51 to 100 i6-cp. lamps 2.00
Over loo i6-cp. lamps 3.00
Electric Power — to 20 h. p i.oo
Babylon Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Farmingdale r Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
West Islip Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Huntington Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Hoosick Falls Electric Lighting — per lamp 12
Electric Power i.oo
Hoosick Electric Lighting — per lamp 12
Electric Power i.oo
f Above % h. p. 25^ per h. p. additional.
56
Cambridge Electric Lighting $o.75
Greenwich Electric Lighting 75
Schuylerville Electric Lighting 75
Victory Mills Electric Lighting 75
Easton Electric Lighting 75
Northumberland Electric Lighting 75
Saratoga Electric Lighting 75
White Creek Electric Lighting .75
LeRoy Electric Lighting .75
Electric Power 75
Hartwick Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — per h. p 25
Cooperstown Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — per h. p 25
Milford Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — per h. p 25
Richfield Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — per h. p 25
Croghan Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
Lowville Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
Castorland Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
Bainbridge Electric Lighting i.oo
Sidney Electric Lighting i.oo
Unadilla ' Electric Lighting i.oo
Gouverneur Electric Lighting i.oo
Hailsboro Electric Lighting i.oo
Tallman, N. Y. to
Mahwah, N. J Electric Lighting —
Single-phase meters 75
Polyphase meters 1.50
Tallman, N. Y. to
Wyckhoff, N. J Electric Lighting—
Single-phase meters 75
Polyphase meters 1.50
57
Tallman, N. Y. to
Allendale, N. J Electric Lighting—
Single-phase meters $0.75
Polyphase meters 1.50
Tallman, N. Y. to
Ramsey, N. J Electric Lighting —
Single-phase meters 75
Polyphase meters 1.50
Tallman, N. Y. to
Saddle River, N. J Electric Lighting—
Single-phase meters 75
Polyphase meters 1.50
Tallman, N. Y. to Upper
Saddle River, N. J Electric Lighting—
Single-phase meters 75
Polyphase meters 1.50
Tallman, N. Y. to
Cragmere, N. J Electric Lighting —
Single-phase meters 75
Polyphase meters 1.50
Waverly, N. Y. to So.
Waverly, Pa Electric Lighting i.io
Electric Power i.oo
Waverly, N. Y. to
Sayre, Pa Electric Lighting i.io
Electric Power i.oo
Waverly, N. Y. to
Athens, Pa Electric Lighting i.io
Electric Power i.oo
Page 119, Seventh Annual Report
Rochester Electric Lighting —
Up to 2l/2 k. w i.oo
2^ to 5 k. w 2.00
Over 5 k. w 3.00
Charlotte Electric Lighting —
Up to 2l/2 k. w i.oo
2.y2 to 5 k. w 2.00
Over 5 k. w 3.00
Brighton Electric Lighting —
Up to 2.y2 k. w i.oo
2J/2 to 5 k. w 2.00
Over 5 k. w 3.00
58
Chili Electric Lighting —
Up to 2.y-2 k. w $1.00
2^ to 5 k. w 2.00
Over 5 k. w 3.00
Gates '. Electric Lighting —
Up to 2.y2 k. w i.oo
2.l/2 tO 5 k. W 2.OO
Over 5 k. w 3.00
Greece Electric Lighting —
Up to 2.y2 k. w i.co
2^ to 5 k. w , . 2.00
Over 5 k. w 3.00
Irondequoit Electric Lighting —
Up to 2^ k. w i.co
2j4 to 5 k. w 2.00
Over 5 k. w 3.00
Webster Electric Lighting —
Up to 2^ k. w i.co
2*/2 tO 5 k. W 2.00
Over 5 k. w 3.00
Mount Vernon Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
New Rochelle Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Tarrytown Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Syracuse , Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Camillus Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
East Syracuse Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Eastwood Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Fayetteville Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Liverpool Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Solvay Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power . i.co
59
DeWitt Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power i.oo
Geddes Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Manlius Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Minoa Electric Lighting i.oo
- Electric Power i.oo
Onondaga Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Salina Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Jamesville Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Little Falls • Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Utica Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Dolgeville Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Frankfort Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Herkimer Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power co
Ilion Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power co
Mohawk Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power co
New Hartford Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power co
Whitesboro Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power co
Yorkville Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Barneveld Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Chadwicks Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Deerfield Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power . i.oo
6o
New York Mills Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power i.co
Oriskany Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Sauquoit Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Washington Mills Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Willowvale Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Saratoga Electric Lighting i.io
Ballston Spa Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Watervliet Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Oneida Electric Lighting 84
Amsterdam Electric Lighting 60
Electric Power 50
Glens Falls Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.co
Hagaman Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power 50
Canastota Electric Lighting 50
Lake George Electric Lighting 50
Cohoes Electric Power i.co
Saratoga Springs Electric Power i.co
Newb'.irgh Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power — $1.00 per h. p 2.00
Poughkeepsie , . . . . Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — $1.00 per h. p.. . . 2.00
Cornwall Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — $1.00 per h. p.. . . 2.00
Marlboro Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — $1.00 per h. p. . . . 2.00
Montgomery Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — $1.00 per h. p 2.00
New Paltz Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — $1.00 per h. p. . . . 2.00
Walden .- Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — $1.00 per h. p. . . 2.00
6i
Hyde Park Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power— $1.00 per h. p 2.00
Lloyd Electric Lighting I.OO
Electric Power — $1.00 per h. p. . . . 2.00
Marbletown Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — $1.00 per h. p. . . . 2.00
New Windsor Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — $1.00 per h. p.. . . 2.00
Shawangimk Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — $1.00 per h. p.... 2.00
Troy Electric Power i.oo
Waterford Electric Power i.co
Auburn Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
Owasco Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.co
Gloversvillc Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.co
Johnstown Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.co
Watertown Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.ooa
Adams Electric Lighting i .00
Electric Power i.ooa
Black River Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.ooa
Brownville Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.ooa
Dexter Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.ooa
Edwards Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.ooa
Glen Park Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.ooa
Sackets Harbor Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.ooa
Natural Bridge Electric Lighting . i.oo
Electric Power i.ooa
a Electric Power— Helow 10 h. p. $1.00 per h. p.; from 10 to 50 h. p., 50^ per h. p.; over
50 h. p.. 25<f perh. p.
62
Geneva Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power i.oo
Clyde Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Lyons Electric Lighting I.OO
Electric Power i.co
Newark Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Palmyra Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Phelps Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Seneca Falls Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Waterloo Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power I.co
Grandview Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Haverstraw Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Nyack '.. Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Piermont Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
South Nyack Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Spring Valley Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Upper Nyack Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
West Haverstraw Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Clarkstown Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Orangetown Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Ramapo Electric Lighting . i.oo
Electric Power 2.00
Stony Point Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power . 2.00
63
Thiells Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power 2,00
Rome Electric Lighting—
For every 40 i6-cp. lamps. . . . i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Kingston Electric Lighting i .co
Electric Power i.co
Esopus Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Hurley Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Ulster Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Briar Cliff Manor Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power I.oo
Croton-on-Hudson Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power i.co
Hillside Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power i.oo
Ossining Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power i.co
Pleasantville Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Cortland Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Mt. Pleasant Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
New Castle Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Yorktown Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power i.co
Oswego Electric Lighting 5°
Electric Power 75
Cohoes Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
Waterf ord Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
Colonie Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
Hudson Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power i.oo
64
Rensselaer Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power i.oo
Kinderhook Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Nassau Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power i.oo
Valatie Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
East Greenbnsh Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power i.co
East Schodack Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.co
Niverville Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power oo
North Chatham Electric Lighting co
Electric Power oo
Stuyvesant Falls Electric Lighting oo
Electric Power oo
Albion Electric Lighting 5ob
Electric Power 75
Barker Electric Lighting 5ob
Electric Power 75
Brockport Electric Lighting 5ob
Electric Power 75
Lyndonvillc Electric Lighting 5ob
Electric Power 75
Medina Electric Lighting 5ob
Electric Power 75
Middleport Electric Lighting Sob
Electric Power 75
Carlton Electric Lighting Sob
Electric Power 75
Eagle Harbor Electric Lighting Sob
Electric Power 75
Gaines Electric Lighting Sob
Electric Power 75
Gasport Electric Lighting Sob
Electric Power 75
Knowlesville Electric Lighting Sob
Electric Power 75
b 50^ for the first 15 lamps of @ 5$ ea.; over 25 lamps at 2$ ea.
65
Murray Electric Power $0.75
Ridgeway Electric Lighting 5ob
Electric Power 75
Shelby Electric Lighting 5ob
Electric Power 75
Somerset. Electric Lighting 50!)
Electric Power 75
Waterport Electric Lighting 5ob
Electric Power 75
Yates Electric Lighting 5ob
Electric Power 75
Peekskill Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power i.oo
Cortland Electric Lighting I.co
Electric Power i.oo
Yorktown Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power i.oo
Middletown Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
Glen Falls Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
South Glen Falls Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
Plattsburg Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power i.oo
(First 3 h. p., $i. co h. p. Next
2 h. p., 75^ h. p. All over
5 h. p. at sctf h.p.)
Port Jervis Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power 50
Deerpark Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power 50
Athens Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power — 25^ per h. p 1.25
Catskill Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power — 25^ per h.p 1.25
Coxsackie Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power — 25^ per h. p 1.25
Hunter Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power — 25$ per h.p 1.25
66
Tannersville Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power — 25^ per h. p 1.25
Cairo Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — 25$ per h. p 1.25
Ravenna Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — 25^ per h. p 1.25
Beacon Electric Lighting 1.50
Corning Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Painted Post Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Corning Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Painted Post Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Islip Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Fort Edward Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
Hudson Falls Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
South Glen Falls Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
Moreau Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
LaSalle Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Oneonta Electric Lighting i.oo
Mechanicsville Electric Lighting 25
Electric Power i.oo
Stillwater Electric Lighting 25
Electric Power i.oo
Elmira Electric Lighting —
House 75
Store i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Elmira Heights Electric Lighting —
House 75
Store . . i.oo
Electric Power . i.oo
6?
Horseheads Electric Lighting-
House $0.75
Store i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Montour Falls Electric Lighting —
House 75
Store i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Southport Electric Lighting —
House 75
Store i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Depew Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 75
Lancaster ." Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 75
Sloan Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power 75
Cheektowaga Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power 75
Page 199, Seventh Annual Report
Dansville Electric Lighting i.co
Electric Power i.oo
Norwich Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Bath Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
Granville Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
$1.00 h. p. first 5 h. p. Over
5 h. p. 75^ per h. p.
Middle Granville Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power i.oo
$1.00 h. p. first h. p. Over 5
h. p. 75tf per h. p.
Fort Plain Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power 50
Nelliston Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power 50
68
Warsaw Electric Lighting $1.00
Electric Power 1.50
First 3 h. p. per h. p. $1.50
Over 3 h. p. $1.20 to 75^
per h. p. according to in-
stallation.
Wappingers Falls Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — per h. p 50
Hughsonville Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — per h. p 50
Municipal Electric Light Plants
Page 163, Seventh Annual Report
Jamestown Electric Lighting i.oo
Herkimer Electric Lighting 50
Dunkirk Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power 1.25
Fairport Electric Lighting 80
Electric Power 2.00
Up to 2]/2 h. p. 8otf per h. p.
for large sizes.
Salamanca (Annual charge varies from $12
to $500) i.oo
Lake Placid Electric Lighting 75
(75^ meter rent when service
is below this figure.)
Electric Power 75
(75$ meter rent when service
is below this figure.)
Penn Yan Electric Lighting 50
Electric Power i.oo
Watkins Electric Lighting 50
Hamilton Electric Lighting 50
Skaneateles Electric Lighting 20
(Meter Rent 20^ mo.)
Electric Power —
(Meter Rent 20^ mo.)
69
§ 82. New York Public Service Commission. Second District.
Artificial Gas Utilities Monthly Minimum Charges.
The following minimum charges, furnished by the Commission, are
in effect under its supervision. The data were taken from pages 121, 140,
198 and 206 of the Commission's Seventh Annual Report and given in
same order.
Page 121, Seventh Annual Report
Company
Auburn Gas Service $0.50
Geneva Gas Service 50
Waterloo Gas Service 50
Seneca Falls Gas Service 50
Lyons Gas Service 50
Newark Gas Service 50
Palmyra Gas Service 50
Phelps Gas Service 50
Kingston Gas Service 50
Albion Gas Service 50
Plattsburg Gas Service 50
Port Jervis Gas Service 50
Catkskill Gas Service 25
Beacon Gas Service 50
Mechanicsville Gas Service 25
Saratoga Springs Gas Service 58
Oneida Gas Service 50
Page 140, Seventh Annual Report
Buffalo Gas Service 50
Hempstead Gas Service 50
Garden City Gas Service .50
Ithaca Gas Service . . 55
Cortland Gas Service 25
Homer • • • Gas Service. ... 25
Fulton .Gas Service.. 50
Ogdensburg Gas Service 50
Page 199, Seventh Annual Report
Dansville Gas Service $0.50
Bath Gas Service 50
Granville Gas Service 50
Page 206, Seventh Annual Report
Saugerties Gas Service 20
Brockport Gas Service 25
Waverly Gas Service 25
Owego Gas Service 25
Penn Yan Gas Service 50
Haverstraw Gas Service 50
West Haverstraw Gas Service 50
§ 83. New York Public Service Commission. Second District.
Natural Gas Utilities, Monthly Minimum Charges.
The following minimum charges, furnished by the Commission, are
in effect under its supervision. The data were taken from pages 121,
140, 154 and 214 of the Commission's Seventh Annual Report and given
in same order.
Page 121, Seventh Annual Report
Elmira Natural Gas Service $0.50
Lancaster Natural Gas Service 30
Page 140, Seventh Annual Report
Tonawanda Natural Gas Service , 30
No. Tonawanda Natural Gas Service 30
Kenmore Natural Gas Service 30
Amherst Natural Gas Service 30
Page 154, Seventh Annual Report
Caton Center Natural Gas Service 50
Mossy Glen Natural Gas Service 50
Southport Natural Gas Sci /ice 50
Chautauqua Natural Gas Service i.oo
Basis $12.00 per annum.
Perry Natural Gas Service 50
Warsaw Natural Gas Service 50
Covington Natural Gas Service 50
Pavilion Natural Gas Service $0.50
Olean Natural Gas Service 50
Angelica Natural Gas Service 50
Belfast Natural Gas Service 50
Belmont Natural Gas Service 50
Friendship Natural Gas Service 50
Portville Natural Gas Service 50
Corning Natural Gas Service 45
Hornell Natural 'Gas Service 50
Elmira Natural Gas Service 5°
Southport Natural Gas Service '. 5°
Page 214, Seventh Annual Report
Baldwinsville " Natural Gas Service i.oo
Canisteo Natural Gas Service 5°
§ 84. Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission. Electric Utili-
ties. Monthly Minimum Charges.
Narragansett Electric Lighting Co., Providence, R. I., 4 R. S., p. 19.
Electric Power — Less than 2 h. p $1.00
50^ per h. p. per month for installations ranging from
2 to 10 h. p. ; $5.00 for installation exceeding %
10 h. p.
§ 85. West Virginia Public Service Commission. Electric Utili-
ties. Monthly Minimum Charges.
The following were taken from Part II of the Commission's First
Annual Report, and show the rate schedules in effect under jurisdiction
of the Commission. The figures at the left indicate the page number
from which the data are taken.
684 Bluefield Electric Window Lighting $0.75
684 Keystone General Electric Lighting i.oo
684 Welch Electric Lighting 75
684 Pocahontas, Va Electric Lighting 75
684 Pulaski, Va Electric Lighting 75
684 Wytheville, Va Electric Lighting 75
72
684 Marion, Va Electric Lighting $0.75
684 Galax, Va Electric Lighting 75
685 Christiansburg, Va Electric Lighting 75
685 Dublin, Va Electric Lighting 75
685 Bramwell Electric Lighting 75
685 Bethany Electric Lighting—
7$ per lamp for which each
house is wired.
688 Huntington Electric Lighting I.OO
Electric Power 1 .00
First 5 h. p. or less per h. p.
$1.00. 50^ per h. p. for
all h. p. in excess of 5
h.p.
689 Mannington Electric Lighting i.oo
689 Belington Electric Lighting i.oo
689 Davis Electric Lighting i.oo
691 Elkins Electric Lighting i.oo
692 Cascade Electric Lighting i.oo
696 Marlinton Electric Lighting 1.50
696 Martinsburg Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — per h. p i.oo
698 Newell Electric Lighting 50
700 Pittsburg Electric Lighting i.oo
703 Princeton Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — per h. p i.oo
704 Clifton Forge Electric Lighting i.oo
707 Wheeling Electric Lighting .50
Electric Power i.oo
708 Morgantown Electric Lighting 75
Electric Power —
2 h. p. or less 2.00
3 to 5 h.p 3.00
6 h. p. and over each 50^ per
month.
709 Charleston Electric Lighting i.oo
Electric Power — per h. p * ro
73
§ 86. West Virginia Public Service Commission. Natural Ga*
Utilities: Monthly Minimum Charges for Gas Service.
The following were taken from Part II of the Commission's First
Annual Report, and show the rate schedules now in effect under jurisdic-
tion of the Commission. The figures at the .left indicate the page number
from which the data arc taken.
Company Town
753 Ohio Valley Gas Chester $0.56
753 Ohio Valley Gas Newell 56
753 Ohio Valley Gas Fairview 56
753 Ohio Valley Gas Congo 56
755 Ohio Valley Gas Cameron District 50
755 Ohio Valley Gas . V Liberty District 50
755 Ohio Valley Gas Webster District 56
757 Point Pleasant Point Pleasant 50
762 Tri-State Weirton 56
762 Tri-State Holliday's Grove 56
762 Tri-State Tyler County i.oo
762 Tri-State Wetzel County i.oo
762 Tri-State Meade District i.oo
762 Tri-State Liberty District i.co
762 Tri-State Cameron District i.oo
762 Tri-State Franklin District i.oo
762 Tri-State Webster District i.oo
763 Tri-State Clay District. 56
763 Tri-State Washington District 56
763 Tri-State Union District 56
763 Tri-State Wellsburg 56
763 Tri-State Follansbee 56
763 Tri-State West Liberty ' 56
763 Tri-State Brook County 56
763 Tri-State Ohio County 56
768 Tuel West & Co Sistersville i.oo
769 United Fuel Barboursville .21
769 United Fuel Blue Creek 20
769 United Fuel Burdette 25
769 United Fuel Charleston 20
74
Company Town
771 United Fuel Clendenin $0.15
771 United Fuel Culloden 21
771 United Fuel Ceredo 21
771 United Fuel Ft. Gay .21
772 United Fuel Gandeeville 50
772 United Fuel Gay 50
772 United Fuel Huntington 21
772 United Fuel Hurricane 20
772 United Fuel Kenova 21
772 United Fuel Kermit 21
772 United Fuel Logan 25
774 United Fuel Ona 20
774 United Fuel Poca 20
774 United Fuel Ripley 23
774^ United Fuel Ravenswood 23
774 United Fuel Reedy 50
775 United Fuel Sandyville 23
775 United Fuel Spencer 25
775 United Fuel Walton 50
775 United Fuel Williamson 25
776 United Fuel Walton District 50
776 United Fuel Smithfield District 50
776 United Fuel Geary District 50
776 United Fuel Spencer District 50
776 United Fuel ' . . Curtis District 50
776 United Fuel Harper District 50
777 United Fuel Jackson County 23
778 Wayne L. H. & W Wayne i.oo
788 W. Va. Trac. & Elec. . . . Wheeling i.oo
789 Wetzel Gas New Martinsville 92
789 Wetzel Gas Brooklyn 92
789 Wetzel Gas Wetzel County 92
789 Wetzel Gas Elsworth District 92
790 Wetzel Gas Brooklyn 54
790 Wetzel Gas New Martinsville 54
790 Wetzel Gas Tyler County 54
75
Company Town
790 Wetzel Gas Wetzel County $0.54
792 Wheeling N. G Warwood 56
792 Wheeling N. G McMechen 56
792 Wheeling N. G Richland District 56
792 Wheeling N. G Triadelphia District 56
792 Wheeling N. G Union District 56
792 Wheeling N. G Glendale 56
792 Wheeling N. G Elsworth District 56
792 Wheeling N. G McClellan District 56
792 Wheeling N. G Grant District 56
793 Wheeling N. G Sedalia 56
793 Wheeling N. G Glen Easton 56
793 Wheeling N. G Mannington District 56
794 Wheeling X. G Benwood 60
794 Wheeling N. G Cameron 54
794 Wheeling N. G Doddridge 54
795 Wheeling X. G Glenova 60
796 Wheeling N. G Harrison County 54
796 Wheeling N. G Hundred 54
796 Wheeling N. G Marion County 54
797 Wheeling X. G Sandhill District 60
797 Wheeling X. G Washington District 60
797 Wheeling X. G Clay District 60
797 Wheeling X. G Webster District 60
797 Wheeling X. G Cameron District 54
797 Wheeling X. G Franklin District 54
797 Wheeling X. G Liberty District 54
797 Wheeling X. G Meade District 54
798 Wheeling X. G Monogalia 54
798 Wheeling X. G Moundsville 60
798 Wheeling X. G Ohio County 60
799 Wheeling X. G Tyler County 54
799 Wheeling X. G Warwood 60
800 Wheeling X. G Wetzel County 54
76
§ 87. West Virginia Public Service Commission. Water Utilities.
Monthly Minimum Charges.
The following were taken from Part II of the Commission's First
Annual Report, and show the rate schedules now in effect under jurisdic-
tion of the Commission. The figures at the left indicate the page number
from which the data are taken.
643 Welch Water Service —
4 rooms or less (annual
charge $10.00) $0.83^
5 or 6 rooms (annual charge
$15.00) 1.25
Over 6 rooms (annual charge
$20.00) 1.66%
644 Beckley Water Service i.oo
645 McMechen Water Service —
Based on annual charge of
$10.00 83^/3
648 Bluefield Water Service— y2" Meter 75
24" Meter 4.75
i" Meter 6.00
i*/j" Meter 15.00
2" Meter 35-OO
3" Meter 85.00
4" Meter 210.00
652 Belington Water Service i.co
652 Follansbee Water Service —
I to 5 room house (quarterly
charge $1.50) 50
6 to 12 room house (quarterly
charge $2.25) 75
655 Huntington Water Service i .00
659 Middlebourne Water Service i.oo
660 Moundsville Water Service 75
663 Princeton Water Service —
i M. gal. per day, or less 70
1 to 2 M. gal. per day 10.50
2 to 3 M. gal. per day 18.00
3 to 5 M. gal. per day 22.50
5 to 10 M. gal per day 30.00
Over 10 M 49. 50
77
()j-' Wheeling Water Service —
5^"
Meter . . .
. . $1.00
f£"
Meter . . .
. . 2.00
i"
Meter . . .
. . 4.00
itf*
Meter . . .
. . 5-00
l5/2//
Meter . . .
. . 6.00
2*
Meter .
. 10.00
Larger Meters — $1.00 each 15
gal. per minute of rated
capacity.
§ SS. United States Census Statistics on Water Works Minimum
Charges.
The following show the minimum charges in use in Water Works
Schedules in various cities of the United States, as reported in the Gen-
eral Statistics of Cities for the Year 1915. The figures at the left indicate
the page number from which the data were taken.
Monthly Minimum Charges
Akron, O ............... Water Service—
172
166
181
183
185
166
175
182
180
163
180
171
Atlanta, Ga
Auburn, N. Y
Austin, Texas
Bellingham, Wash.
Birmingham, Ala.
Canton, Ohio
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Charlotte, N. C. ...
Cincinnati, Ohio . . .
Dubuque, Iowa ....
Meter
Meter
Meter
. $0.50
• -75
. i. co
Larger meters in proportion
Meter charge 80
Meter charge 75
Meter charge 50
Water Service 60
.25
•30
.40
.60
i.oo
1.65
2.50
4.00
-50
.90
•50
30
Water Service 75
Water
Service — 5^"
Meter
•HT
Meter
H"
Meter
i"
Meter
i&"
Meter
2"
Meter
3"
Meter
4"
Meter
Water
Service
Water
Service
Water
Service,
Water
Service .
Duluth, Minn Water Service
.50
78
177 El Paso, Texas Water Service—
s/8" Meter— Within city $0.90
Outside city 90
1 77 Flint, Mich Water Service 75
173 Ft. Wayne, Ind Water Service 33^3
180 Galveston, Texas Wrater Service 25
170 Kansas City, Kansas Water Service .70
164 Kansas City, Mo Water Service 50
181 Knoxville, Tenn Water Service 83
1 79 Lincoln, Neb Water Service 50
183 Lorain, Ohio Water Service 50
162 Los Angeles, Cal Water Service —
s/s" and 1/4" Meters .75
i" Meter i.oo
iy2" Meter 1.50
2" Meter 2.00
3" Meter 3.00
4" Meter 4-OC-
6" Meter 6.00
179 Macon, Ga Water Service 60
167 Omaha, Neb Water Service .60
179 Pasadena, Cal Water Service 90
164 Portland, Ore Water Service 50
Water Service —
Outside City i.oo
Elevators, Sidewalk 3.00
Inside Elevators 5-°°
165 St. Paul, Minn Water Service— 5/s" Meter 30
34" Meter 35
i" Meter 50
1 54" Meter 80
iy2" Meter i.io
-2" Meter 2.00
3" Meter 4.50
4" Meter 8.00
168 Salt Lake City, Utah Water Service 50
178 San Diego, Cal Water Service —
y%" or 24" Meter i.oo
i" or iy2" Meter . 1.50
2" Meter 2.00
3" Meter 3-OO
4" Meter 4.00
Over 4" Meter 5-°°
79
174 Savannah, Ga Water Service $0.90
176 Sioux City, Iowa. . : Water Service 50
167 Spokane, Wash Water Service —
Less than 4 rooms 60
4 rooms, bath and closet 80
175 Springfield, 111 Water Service —
Commercial 50
169 Tacoma, Wash Water Service 85
184 Waco, Texas Water Service 75
Quarterly Minimum Charges
182 Amsterdam, N. Y Water Service —
fij" or 24" Meter 2.00
i" Meter 3.00
i ^" Meter 5.00
2" Meter 8.00
3" Meter 10.00
4" Meter 15.00
161 Baltimore, Md Water Service —
Under i" Meter 1.50
i" or larger 2.50
162 Detroit, Mich Water Service 90
180 East Orange, N. J Water Service 1.65
181 Jcliet, 111 Water Service 1.50
178 Kalamazoo, Mich Water Service 75
168 Nashville, Tenn Water Service 1.50
163 Newark, N. J Water Service 1.50
184 Newport, Ky Water Service 1.50
183 Oshkosh, Wis Water Service 1.25
180 Perth Amboy, N. J Water Service i.oo
161 Pittsburg, Pa Water Service—
I and 2 rooms 25
3 and 4 rooms ..50
5 and 6 rooms i.oo
7 and 8 rooms 1.25
9 and 10 rooms 2.00
ii and 12 rooms 2.50
13 and 14 rooms 3.00
15 and 16 rooms 4.00
More than 16 rooms 5.00
176 Rockford, 111 Water Service 80
171 Somerville, Mass Water Service 1.50
8o
175 Springfield, 111
179 Woonsocket, R. I
Water Service — Residence
Water Service
$0.75
2.50
Semi-annual Minimum Charges
176 Altoona, Pa
Water Service
5.00
161 Cleveland, Ohio
Water Service1 — fys" Meter . . .
I 25
y4" Meter
5.OO
i" Meter
\y2" Meter .
6.00
800
2" Meter
3" Meter
4" Meter
6" Meter
. I2.OO
, 25.00
. 4O.CO
75-OO
184 Orange N J
Water Service
2 5O
182 Taunton Mass
Water Service
J. OO
Annual Minimum Charges
176 Atlantic Citv NT
Water Service — Based on Slid-
ing Percentage when assessed
rate is :
$1000
=; oo
$10.00 to $18.00
$1800 to $25 oo
10. CO
13 OO
$25.00 to $35.00
$35.00 to $50.00
$50 oo to $70 oo
18.00
25.00
3^ OO
$70.00 to $100.00
More than $ico oo . .
50.00
7^ oo
177 Augusta, Ga
Water Service —
Within city
Outside city limits
5-00
IO OO
1 78 Bay Citv Mich
Water Service •.
5.00
177 Binghamton N Y
Water Service
4.00
161 Boston Mass
Water Service
8.00
162 Buffalo, N. Y
Water Service — 9/6" Meter
10.00
y4" Meter
i" Meter
11/2" Meter
2" Metei
3" Meter
4" Meter
6" Meter
8" Meter
10" Meter
u" Meter
15.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
100.00
2CO.OO
300.00
400.00
500.00
170 Camden N J
Water
Service
<; oo
166 Columbus Ohio
Water
Service
2. 7O
1 76 Covington Ky
Water
Service
600
181 Everett Mass
Water
Service
II OO
180 Fitchburg Mass
Water
Service — tys"
Meter
5 oo
y
2"'
Meter
Meter
Meter
Meter
. IO.OO
. 12.00
. 18.00
. 25.00
1'
Meter .
1C OO
4"
6"
Meter
Meter
. 60.00
. IOO.OO
173 Harrisburg, Pa
. . Wrater
Service
5.00
174 Holyoke Mass
Water
Service
5 oo
170 Lawrence, Mass ,
. . Water
Service
5.00
183 Lima Ohio
Water
Service
A CO
178 Maiden Mass
. . Water
Service
3 OO
172 Manchester, N. H.
. . . Water
Service
. 8.00
163 Minneapolis Minn
, . . Water
Service
40O
177 New Brittain, Conn. .
179 Newton Mass
. . . Water
Water
Service
Service
. 5.00
IO OO
182 Niagara Falls
. . . Water
Service
600
175 Pawtucket R I
. Water
Service
C, OO
160 Philadelphia Pa . .
Water
Service — y2"
Ferrule
s OO
165 Providence, R I ..
Water
y*"
w
1/2"
3"
4"
6"
Service
Ferrule ...
Ferrule . . .
Ferrule ...
Ferrule ...
Ferrule ...
Ferrule . . .
Ferrule ...
Ferrule . . .
Ferrule ...
. 8.00
. 13.00
. 20.00
• 31-25
. 45.00
. 80.00
. 180.00
. 320.00
. 720.00
800
176 Saginaw, Mich
. . . Water
Service
IOOO
178 Salem, Mass
. .. Water
Service — Y^"
Meter
T. OO
1/2"
2"
3''
6"
Meter
Meter
Meter
Meter
Meter
Meter . . . .
3.50
5-00
6.50
. IO.OO
. 20.00
. 40.00
82
i7i
Schenectady,
N. Y. ...
... Water
Service
. . $3.00
167
Syracuse, N
. Y
... Water
Service . . .
4.00
J.VF/
166
Toledo, Ohi
o
Water
Service ....
c 40
Trenton, N.
J
Water
Service
IO.OO
16
\Vashington
D C
Water
Service
A c^O
\Vaterbury
Conn. . . .
. . . Water
Service
=; oo
171
\Vilmington,
Del
. . . Water
Service— §4''
' Meter
IOOO
*/.*
' Meter
15.00
i"
Meter . . .
. . 20.00
ll/2
' Meter ...
. . 30.00
2"
Meter . . .
. . 40.00
3"
Meter . . .
. . 50.00
4"
Meter . . .
. . 60.00
5"
Meter . . .
. . 70.00
6"
Meter
80.00
171
Yonkers. N.
Y. .
. Water
Service .
4.OO
•THIS BOOK
Ep -O rf
JftW i.**
Gaylord Bros.
Maker*
Syracuse. N. Y.
PAT. JAN. 21, BO*
re
i o
3G5574
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY
Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Books to Borrow
Open Library
TV News
Understanding 9/11