Skip to main content

Full text of "Remarkable autographs ... With notes on indications of character in handwriting"

See other formats


BF 


■  ■ 


'  HH 


■ 


EM 


Class 
Book 


r 


O   s\ 


Sj^ THERE  ARE  5AI0T0  BE  TEMPER- 
||(AiVlENTS  ■'ENDOWED .WITH  §YM~ 
|l  PATH! ES  SO  EXQUISITE  THAT,  BY  ?$ 
illMERELY  HANDLING  AN  AUTOGRAPH 
1  THEY  CAN -UETECTTHE.  WRITERS  '( 
I  CHARACTER  WITH  UNERRING,.^  j)f' 
f ACCURACY"    ''^s^r   -"^M 

ie        tf^F  <•  H  a  wrHo  rN  tr*  wS 


(So,, 


Copyright,  1887,  by  W.  T.  Call. 


Press  of  B.  W.  Dinsmoss  &  Co.,  12  Frankfort  Street,  New  York. 


§n 

WPH 

53111 

'    E^**18S 

SB 

A«fefer 

Jultf^ctisemjetxt 


- 


No  particular  order  has  been  followed  in  the  arrange- 
ment of  these  autographs.  They  have  been  selected  from 
a  host  of  signatures  of  eminent  persons,  only  those  being 
admitted  here  which  are  distinguished  by  some  marked 
peculiarity.  In  but  a  few  instances,  and  then  for  special 
reasons,  has  it  been  thought  desirable  to  reproduce  auto- 
graphs made  more  than  a  century  ag6.  No  other  work  of 
this  character  is  known,  according  to  the  evidence  of  promi- 
nent collectors  and  dealers,  to  have  been  published  in  this 
country.  Even  a  hasty  glance  at  the  following  pages  shows 
that  the  title  Remarkable  Autographs  is  not  misapplied. 


i 


JP*  gisiswxje  ©otrjerjejfl  itx  W&xitiuQ. 


We  have  it  on  his  own  authority  that  Dr.  Johnson  wrote 
his  unique  and  imperishable  "  Rasselas  "  in  the  evenings  of 
a  single  week.  Well,  here  is  a  calculation  that  may  be- 
surprising  and  perhaps  useful  :  A  rapid  penman  can  write 
thirty  words  in  a  minute.  To  'do  this  he  must  draw  his 
pen  through  the  space  of  a  rod,  sixteen  and  one-half  feet. 
In  forty  minutes  his  pen  travels  a  furlong.  We  make,  on 
an  average,  sixteen  curves  or  turns  of  the  pen  in  writing 
each  word.  Writing  thirty  words  in  a  minute,  we  must 
make  480  turns  to  each  minute  ;  in  an  hour,  28,800 ;  in  a 
day  of  only  five  hours,  144,000  ;  in  a  year  of  300  such 
days,  43,200,000.  The  man,  therefore,  who  made  1,000,000 
strokes  with  his  pen  was  not  at  all  remarkable.  Many 
men  —  newspaper  writers,  for  instance  —  make  4,000,000. 
Here  we  have,  in  the  aggregate,  a  mark  300  miles  long  to 
be  traced  on  paper  by  such  a  writer  in  a  year. 


QUnxnttttistits  in  %&u&mvitiu8. 


,  Some  of  the  peculiarities  of  every-day  correspondence 
are  so  marked  that  they  have  become  universally  recognized, 
and  the  mere  mention  of  the  feminine  hand,  the  school-boy 
hand,  the  business  hand,  the  Italian  hand,  at  once  presents 
to  the  mind's  eye  a  definite,  well  defined  picture  or  idea. 
Every  intelligent  person,  in  fact,  is  more  or  less  familiar  with 
a  large  number  of  distinct  styles  of  chirogra'phy.  At  a  not 
uncertain  point,  however,  in  the  philosophy  of  handwriting 
common  knowledge  stops,  and  the  astute  "chiromancer" 
goes  on  alone.  The  indications  by  which  he  judges  char- 
acter are  somewhat  perplexing  to  the  uninitiated.  He  (or 
she)  is  likely  to  be  a  very  learned  individual.  He  regards 
the  capital  A  as  the  symbol  of  strength  and  beauty  united.  * 
When  the  strokes  are  firm  and  do  not  run  off  into  flourishes,  . 
the  "  strong  barring  "  is  taken  as  indicative  of  a  forceful 
will.  A  loop,  at  the  top  of  this  letter  is  evidence  of  a  strong 
sense  of  beauty.  When  the  capital  takes  the  form  of  the 
small  a,  he  discerns  simplicity  and  clearness  in  the  ideas  of 
the  one  who  wrote  it.  A  loop  to  the  small  d  calls  for 
tenderness  and  generosity,  while  the  three  cornered  capital 
D  suggests  excentricity  and  imagination.  We  are  alsC  told 
that  "an  F  with  a  flying  top  betrays  imagination  and 
indifference,  while  a  curly  one  shows  cultivation  and  a 
sensitive  mind."-  A  curly  H  shows  poetry  and  art,  and  a 
curly  I  gives  grace  and  sense  of  beauty,  while  a  straight 


one  gives  a  higher  and  more  precise  nature  to  the  artistic- 
instinct  arid  increases  the  poetic  faculty.  Then  it  is  said- 
that  "  disproportionate  loops  betray  self-assertion,"  and 
that  we  should  "  look  out  for  them  in  letters  like  P  and  L 
and  Y."  Again  :  "  Letters  stopping  short  at  their  finals 
show  economy ;  long  and  extended  finals  with  spacer 
between  the  words  indicate  generosity,  if  not  extravagance. 
Inward  curves  denote  egotism.  Stops  are  also  most  dis- 
tinctive. Heavy  and  black,  they  betray  sensuality  ;  long, 
they  denote  vivacity  and  originality.  An  i  dotted  with  a 
fleck  indicates  recklessness.  Absence  of  stops  shows  want 
of  caution  and  an  unsuspicious  nature."  And  so  on.  These 
quotations,  however,  are  probably  sufficient  to  satisfy  the 
reader  that  a  superior  knowledge  of  characteristics  in  hand- 
writing has  created  a  kind  of  fine  art — so  fine,  indeed,  that 
very  few  should  hope  to  make  progress  in  it  much  beyond 
the  first  "  pshaw  !  "  in  the  course.  Stripped  of  its  nonsense,, 
the  subject  is  full  of  interest,  and  is  well  worthy  of  serious 
consideration.  To  call  a  knowledge  of  character  indica- 
tions in  handwriting  "  grammatomancy,"  and  trace  it  back 
to  the  cradle  of  palmistry,  astrology  and  mysticism,  may 
be  all  very  well,  but  it  is  much  more  to  the  purpose-,  and 
gives  better  satisfaction  generally,  to  have  a  little  more 
realism  to  present.  The  truth  is  that  the  utility  of  the  art, 
or  science,  or  pastime,  has  not  yet  become  patent.  Fifty 
years  ago  the  mortality  table,  on  which  the  success  of  the 
life  insurance  system  now  stands,  would  have  been  of  little 
value  except  as  a  curiosity.     Perhaps  In  another  fifty  years 


character  indications  in  handwriting  may  have  become  an 
important  study.  There  are  numerous  evidences  that  a 
logical  method  will  after  a  while  be  applied  to  the  subject. 
Instead  of  basing  conclusions  on  Chaldean  myths,  attempts 
are  being  made,  here  and  there,  to  get  at  general  character- 
istics by  comparing  the  handwritings  of  individuals  of  a. 
distinct  mental  class.  As  an  instance  we  may  cite  the 
paper  recently  read  to  a  number  of  Phflad&phians  on 
"  The  Handwriting  of  the  Insane,"  in  which  it  was  shown 
that  the  giving  way  of  the  mind  in  an  educated  person  is 
often  indicated  in  bad  spelling,  blotting,  frequent  erasures, 
the  absurd  use  of  parentheses,  italicization  and  underscor- 
ing in  excess.  Insane  pride  and  obstinacy ,'it  was  said,  take 
to  capitals,  and  make  frequent  use  of  the  letter  "  P,"  which 
becomes  perfectly  enormous.  Many  of  these  indicia  were 
found  in  the  handwriting  of  a  public  man  who  recently 
became  insane.  In  him,  too,  was  noted  another  peculiarity, 
a  tendency  to  commence  at  the  right  instead  of  the  left 
hand  side  of  the  paper,  this  being  carried  so  far  that  often 
he  would  not  leave  himself  room  on  the  paper  to  complete 
even  his  signature.  If  what  has  been  learned  in  this  single 
line  of  inquiry  is  true  in  San  Francisco  and  London  and 
elsewhere,  it  must  be  regarded  as  an  important  fact.  There 
are  many,  however,  who  would  like  to  know  the  why,  and 
so  long  as  this  little  word  stands  out  unchallenged  the 
"  grammatomancers  "  will  hold  a  strong  position,  for  they 
always  have  the  stars  to  fall  back  on.  The  graphological 
chemist  puts  moonshine  in  his  retort  when  he  finds  candor 


in  an  open  a  and  secrecy  in  a  closed  o.  But  we  all  can  see 
something  in  pronounced  tendencies,  and  can  readily  ap- 
preciate the  significance  of  striking  peculiarities  and  affec- 
tations in  the  sign-manuals  of  celebrated  persons.  That 
the  autograph,  more  than  all  other  writing,  is  characteristic 
of  the  individual,  there  can  be  no  fair  doubt.  If  it  were 
not  so  there  would  be  no  autograph  collectors,  and  where 
is  there  an  intellectual  household  without  a  few  treasured 
autographs?  At  this  point  it  is  not  inappropriate  to  pre- 
sent a  modest  appeal  from  the  composing-room,  just  as 
received  ]  What  the  compositor  asks  (but  at  present  can- 
not obtain)  is,  not  that  the  n  and  u  be  made  alike,  but  that 
each  have  its  distinctive  shape*;  not  that  the  t  be  made 
similar  to  1,  but  that  it  be  crossed,  or  else  formed  after  a 
fashion  much  in  vogue,  namely,  a  stroke  more  or  less 
sloping,  with  a  loop  from  the  bottom  to  the  centre  on  the 
side  farthest  from  the  letter  following  it  ;  and  lastly,  that 
the  i  be  dotted,  an  omission  which  seems  to  meet  with 
great  favor  among  authors,  though  it  is  very  tantalizing  to 
the  compositor,  since  in  bad  manuscript  the  undotted  i  may 
be  taken  to  represent  either  c,  e,  or  r,  or  even  supposed  to 
form  part  of  what  in  reality  is  the  letter  m.  But  if  the  i's 
were  dotted,  and  the  t's  crossed,  few  complaints  would 
emanate  from  the  printing  offices,  or,  indeed,  ever  be  heard, 
so  great  an  aid  is  the  due  placing  of  these  letter  belongings 
to  tire  task  of  deciphering. 

June,  1887.  .W.  T.  Call. 


sT     \t 


VVws\, 


F.  E.  Spinner.  What  signature  would  grace  the  open- 
ing page  of  a  work  of  this  character  with  more  exact 
appropriateness  than  the  famous  "  grapevine  "  autograph. 
For  more  than  the  lifetime  of  a  generation  it  has  been  the 
despair  of  the  graphologist,  the  reader  of  character  in 
handwriting,  the  treasure-trove  of  the  collector,  and  the 
delight  6i  the  bank  cashier.  A  child  can  imitate  it  to.  the 
point  of  recognition,  but  no  expert  has  yet  succeeded  in 
catching  its  true  spirit.  This,  historic  "  string  of  eels  "~is 
indeed  sui  generis,  peculiar  to  itself,  and  marks  the  only 
instance  in  which  the  autograph  makes  the  fame  of  the 
man.  The  fac-simite  is  from  an  official  document  bearing 
the  superscription,  "  Treasurer's  Office,  September  27, 1862." 
It  is  considered,  flourish  and  all,  one  of  the  best  specimens 
extant  of  the  renowned  hieroglyphics  of  the  Treasurer  of 
the  United  States  at  the  birth  of  the  greenback  and  the 
"shinplaster."  The  writing  on  the  Government  notes  is 
less  free  and  natural  than  that  here  given,  in  which  a  pecu- 
liar flexibility  fills  the  place  of  mechanical  stiffness.  The 
reader  is  cautioned  not  to  attempt  character  reading  in 
this  truly  remarkable  autograph.  While  these  pages  were 
in  preparation  a  letter  was  shown  to  the  writer,  to  which 
was  attached  the  ever-familiar  signature,  executed  as  well 
as  the  failing  eyes  of  a  man  at  the  age  of  85  would  permit. 
By  his-autograph  the  world  has  known  him.  % 


~  %  Bismarck.  The  inexperienced  chirographer  may  be 
surprised  to  learn  that  the  apparent  B  in  ..the  first  half  of 
this  autograph  is  an  s,  and  that  the  queer- looking  character 
at  the  beginning  is  a  B  with  the  prefix  v.  The  signature 
is,  of  course,  in  German.  Everybody  knows  what  to 
expect  in  the  handwriting  of  the  most  prominent  figure  in 
the  political  world-*— the  "iron-willed  Chancellor."  The 
caa#ns  applicable  to  writing  of  a  different  style  maybe 
employed  in  this  instance  by  those  familiar  with  the  char- 
acteristics of  the  German  hand.  The  strokes  are  strong, 
and  the  letters  are  formed  with  energy  unmistakable. 


J.  KT  Emmet.  Without  a  key,  few  could  guess  what 
this  "  queer,'  weird  thing"  is.  Inimitable  in  his  talent, 
the  smiling  *  Fritz  "  is  also  inimitable  in  his  chirography. 
And  surely  no  one  envies  him  in  either  respect.  The  charm 
of  his  lullabies,  cuckoo  songs  and  Tyrolean  warbles  is  be- 
yond the  reach  of  envy,  and  in  a  different  sense  so  is  his 
autograph.  It  is  a  badly  constructed  plagiarism  on  an  im- 
perfect cobweb,  and  cannot  be  honestly  analyzed. 


7 


*^r* 


Jay  Gould.  The  broad,  plain  shafts,  of  which  this 
signature  is  composed,  stand  out  cold  and  watchful,  like 
the  sentinels  of  a  treasure  house.  With  a  little  urging  of 
the  imagination  the  capitals  may  be  regarded'  as  monu- 
ments to  wealth  and  power.  The  significance  of  tJfcs  signa- 
ture is  as  great  in  reality  as  in  the  fancy.  It  was  once 
placed  on  a  check  for  $1,500,000.  This  is  a  business  auto- 
graph—that of  a  man  who  has  the  genius  to  succeed,  and 
who,  if  report  says  truly,  knows  it  himself,  for  he  has  been 
credited  with  the  remark  that  if  he  stood  penniless  and 
without  influence  on  the  steps  of  the  Stock  Exchange  he 
would  acquire  wealth  in  an  incredibly  short  time.  His 
home  impulses  are  tender  and  ordinary,  and  are  only 
slightly  indicated  in  this  specimen. 


Rqscoe  Conkling.  Here  is  a  fine  subject  for  the 
student  in  grammatomancy.  ,  It  is  perfectly  clear,  and  has 
those  fine  loops  and  curves  that  are  pleasing  to  the  eye 
without  being  essential  #  to  the  main  stems.  The  graceful 
sweep  of  the  C  in  particular  may  be  taken  as  indicative  of 
a. mind  that  loves  to  embellish  a  hard  fact  so  that  it  may 
make  an  impression  without  seeming  to  be  hammered  into 
place.  A  direct  and  minute  comparison  may  be  success- 
fully made  between  the  chirography  and  the  oratory  of  this 
distinguished  man.  The  intent  is  never  lost  sight  of  in 
either  case. 


Theophile  Gautier.  One  of  the  most  curious  auto- 
graphs of  this  or  any  ether  time  is  that  here  repro- 
duced. There  is  no  affectation  about  it.  The  natural 
course  of  the  pen  has  been  followed.  In  his  general  writ- 
ing Gautier  produced  many  a  page- of  legible,  and  even 
beautiful,  manuscript  in  prose  and  poetry  of  the  highest  or- 
der of  French  genius.  He  may  be  called  a  true  calligra- 
phist,  that  is,  a  good  penman.  This  does  not,  however,  apply 
to  his  autograph,  which  is  not  only  too  small,  but  has  de- 
generated in  the  hurry  and  familiarity  of  the  signature  into 
a  step-ladder  scrawl  of  minute  proportions.  A  very  good 
authority  has  said  that  the  author- of  such  a  hand  could 
never  by  any  possible  chance  be  an  ordinary  person. 


Emile  ZpLA.  The  world  may  scoff,  but  Zola  will 
continue  to  write  books  full  of  the  most  barefaced  realism. 
And  the  world  will  go  on  reading  his  books  and  keep  him 
in  the  place  he  has  long  held,  of  the  most  popular  novelist 
of  the  day.  He  is  the  greatest  genius  in  realism,  despite, 
or  perhaps  by  means  of,  his  evident  belief  that  nothing  is 
too  slimy  to  be  handled.  The  authorities  in  this  country 
think  differently,  and  his  works  in  translations  are  sup- 
pressed. Howells  and  other  masters  of  a  tamer  realism  ad- 
mire his  genius.  Zola  writes  a  plain  hand,  and  in  his  signa- 
ture runs  the  strokes  where  they  naturally  go,  without 
regard  to  elegance  or  taste.  He  is  after  the  actual,, and  in 
his  books,  as  in  his  autograph,  he  drops  his  lines  into  the 
depths. 


B 

!filfcte» 

'Wi^S§3- 

* 

www* 


Sitting  Bull.  Like  the  penmanship  of  the  school- 
boy, this  autograph  must  be  taken  as  unformed,  if  not  pre- 
mature. It  is  not  possible  to  form  a  fair  judgment  of  its 
prominent  characteristics.  That  so  celebrated  an  Indian 
should  be  able  to  wield  a  pen  as  well  as  a  tomakawk  is  not 
in  itself  remarkable.  Whether  the  dropping  of  the  capital 
letters  is  significant  of  the  natural  craftiness  of  the  red 
men,  as  a  race,  has  not  been  ascertained,  owing  to  the  scarcity 
of  specimens  from  which  to  form  a  conclusion. 


'    E~* 


Geo.  Francis  Train.     This  is  the  train 
on  which  many  a  great  idea  has  come  into 
the  present  century.  The  track  takes  a  long, 
graceful  sweep,  doubles  enigmatically  on 
itself,  shoots  off  suddenly  into  *  a  mag- 
nificent G,  and  disappears  in  a  flare 
of  light,    forming   in   its   course  a 
beautiful  horseshoe  curve.     There 
are  other  styles  of  autograph  in 
the  repertoire  of  this  singular 
individual,  but  this  one,  life 
size  and  genuine,  has  come 
to  the  writer  on  a  semi- 
business  communication, 
and   is  beyond  doubt 


characteristic  of  the 
of     the      greatest 
century    have 
his  brain,  only 
more    evenly 
lects.     And 
able  cosmic 


entirely 
man.  Some 
ideas  of  the 
come    from 
to  be  utilized  by 
balanced     intel- 
now  this  unspeak- 
philosopher  eschews 
audible       communion 
with  the  world,  and  pass- 
es  most   of    his  time,  in 
pleasant  weather,  on  a  favor- 
*  ite  bench  in  Madison  Square, 
surrounded  with  hosts  of  little 
children  who  ply  him  with  ques- 
tions, and    problems    which    only 
children  and  the  really  great  think  of. 


v;sSses6g^2 


Jenny  Goldschmidt.  The  "  magic  of  a  voice,"  which 
brought  the  world  to  the  feet  of  Jenny  Lind,  does  not  find 
its  co-ordinate  in  her  chirography.  Her  autograph  as  here 
presented  is  striking  and  legible  at  the  same  time,  but  is 
devoid  of  those  wonderful  qualities  which  marked  her  voCal 
efforts,  unless,  indeed,  the  conjunction  and  execution  of  the 
y  and  G  may  afford  a  subject  for  the  analytical  mind  of 
the  expert  in  handwriting. 


> 


^40U^y 


Bfrify* 


vpts 


William  Shakespeare.  Scholars  have  accepted  only 
three  of  the  autographs  of  the  man  who  represents  the 
entire  genius  of  his  .country  as  genuine,  and  even  the 
signature  in  the  British  Museum  bears  the  stigma  of  doubt- 
ful authenticity.  It  is  not  out  of  place,  then,  to  reproduce 
here  that  remarkable  find  of  recent  date  which  is  closer 
than  the  others  to  the  signature  on  Shakespeare's  will. 
It  would  hardly  be  said,  even  on  a  thorough  acquaintance 
with  the  quaint  style  of  writing  of  the  Elizabethan  period, 
that  the  great  dramatist's  autograph  is  in  any  way  hand- 
some. The  peculiarities  of  the  chirography  of  the  times 
may  be  seen  somewhat  more  clearly,  perhaps,  in  the  follow- 
ing full-size  fac-simile  of  the  signature  of  "  Good  Queen 
Bess  "  herstlf. ' 


4 


M^L^% 


Mary  E.  Walker,  M.  D.  It  can  hardly  be  called 
discourteous  to  say  that  the  famous  doctor  is  to  the  eye 
not  less  agreeable  in  demi-male  attire  than  in  her  autograph. 
The  difficulty  of  assigning  the  proper  sex  from  the  general, 
appearance  is  typified  in  the  variety  of  slant  to  the  letters, 
which  makes  it  puzzling  to  fix  upon  the  slope  of  the  name 
as  a  whole.  The  curious  whip-lash  flourish  may  be  taken 
as  expressive  of  singled  disappointment,  anger,  and  deter- 
mination. U  is  evident  that  the  pen,  at  least,  must  give  in,, 
however  stubborn  the  world  may  be. 


Victoria  R.  The  first  autograph  of  her  Majesty,  in 
the  above  pair,  is  an  exact  reproduction  of  a  genuine  sig- 
nature made  in  the  year  1886.  The  second  is  a4so  a  perfect 
fac-simile  of  the  Queen's  signature  as  written  in  the  year  in 
which  she  ascended  to  the  throne  of  the  Kingdom  of  Great 
Britain  and  Ireland,  beginning  June  20,  1837.  The  two 
writings  thus  represent  the  extremes  of  a  period  of  nearly 
half  a  century.  Comment  on  the  truly  remarkable  simi- 
larity of  the  signatures  of  the  Queen  at  the  age  of  18  and 
at  the  age  of  67  is  wholly  superfluous.  At  first  glance  the 
autographs  appear  identical.     The  flourish   following  the 


royal  R,  with  the  somewhat  elevated  period,  and  the  loop 
and  long  sweep  of  the  V,  present  the  principal  variations  of 
the  later  writing.  When  the  early  signature  was  created 
her  Majesty  was  already  accomplished  in  music,  drawing,. 
and  the  continental  languages,  With  botany  as  her  -favorite 
study  among  the  sciences.  She  had  been  taught  to  seek 
health  and  acquire  fearlessness  in  those  outdoor  recreations 
that  have-ever  been  regarded  as  the  true  foundation^ on 
which  the  power  and  greatness  of  the  English  mind  is 
built.  These  autographs  are  particularly  interesting  just  at 
the  present  time,  as  this  is  the  great  Jubilee  year  in  which 
the  United  Kingdom  will  celebrate  the  most  successful  and 
satisfactory  fifty  years  ever  covered  in  the  reign  of  a  single 
sovereign.  The  Queen  was  born  May  24,  181 9,  ascended 
to  the  throne  June  20,  1837,  was  proclaimed  June  21/1837, 
and  was  crowned  June  28,  1838.  Victoria,  Queen,  is  known 
by  name  and  fame  to  more  living  human  beings  than  any 
other  individual  ever  has  been  at  any  one  moment.  Her 
autograph  is  a  splendid  specimen  of  calligraphy. 


Edgar  A.  Poe.  A  professional  chirographist,  who  has 
probably  made  a  closer  study  of  handwriting  as  a  sci- 
ence than  any  other  person  in  England  or  America,  pro- 
nounces Poe  "  the  supreme  prince  of  manuscript."  It  is 
perplexing  to  the  student  in  chirography  to  find  that  the 
genius  which  created  Annabel  Lee  and  The  Bells  figured 
anyway  but  fantastically  in  manuscript.  Poe's  social 
letters  and  acknowledgments  of  invitationsv  might  serve  as 
models  for  steel  plate  engravers.  The  above  specimen  of 
his  signature  is  nearer  the  average  of  his  penmanship  than* 
most  others  extant.  It  was  selected  from  a  number  for 
this  reason.  Poe's  genuine  autograph  has  a  high  value  in 
the  collector's  market,  and  is  fast  becoming  rare. 


\ 


Walt  Whitman.    This  autograph  is  a  genuine  surprise. 
It  is,  indeed,  entirely  ordinary,  not  at  all  outlandish,  and 
even  tends  downward — what !  no  ambition  ?    Whence,  then, 
those   acrobatic,   juggleristic,   prestidigitatorial   feats  with 
language  ?     Robert  Buchanan,  the  Scotch-English  critic, 
playwright,  "and  poet  (a  good  one  in  spots)  rises  to  explain. 
He  christens  the  "  good,  gray  poet  "  of  Camden  (N.  J.)  the 
American   Socrates,   but  greater,   and   likens   him  to  the 
founder   of   Christianity.     This   modern  Titan  lives  "  in  a 
land  [N.  J.  is  a  part  of  the  U.  S.]  of  which  he  will  one  day 
be  known  as  the  chief  literary  glory,"  and  he  (Mr.  B.)  has 
sees  "face  to  face  the  wisest  and  noblest,  the  most  truly, 
great  of  all  literary  men."     Of  course  it  would  be  useless, 
and  even  sacrilegious,  to  attempt  to  dissect  the  great  one's 
sign-manual,  for  Mr.  Buchanan  is  speaking  for  a  coterie  of 
latter-day  poets  and  prophets.     It  is  not  out  of  place,  how- 
ever, to  reproduce  the  words  of  one  who  has  seen  a  real 
Whitman  manuscript.     "  The  handwriting  is  bold,  rugged 
almost,  as  would  be  expected  in  one  who  aims  at  thought 
and   truth,  and   disregards  "the   means  by  which   ordinary 
people   do   ordinary  things.     If  he   makes  a  mistake,  he 
scratches  it  out  or  rubs  it  out  with  his  finger.     Having 
seized  an  idea  he  puts  it  down^pn  anything  at  hand.     A 
single  page  may  represent  brown,  blue  and  white  paper  and 
red  and  black  ink,  with  some  pencil  marks."    In  this  light 
the  above  signature  is  useless  to  the  character  reader. 


'///// 


djj^22i 


James  G.  Blaine.  Note  the  striking  family  resemblance 
in  these  pei\  marks  and  those  of  Roscoe  Conkling.  Mr.* 
Blaine  at  this  time  is  the  most  prominent  American  citizen 
in  private  life.  His  autograph  is  plainly  indicative  of  his 
masterly  command  of  the  pen,  and  everybody  knows  that 
the  same  adjective  describes  his  manner  of  handling  men. 
The  small  letters  are  made  in  a  most  decisive  way,  and  show 
self-confidence  and  wonderful  energy.  The  capitals  are 
somewhat  squeezed,  as  if  their  author  lacked  the  breadth  of 
thought  which  belongs  to  the  genius  of  all  time.  A  man 
who  embodies  the  vigorous  rushing  spirit  of  his  generation, 
Mr  Blaine's  autograph  in  its  entirety  is  a  good  index  to  his 
rapiri^  and  brilliant  career.  It  partakes  of  the  most  dis- 
tinguishing qualities  of  the  man,  even  to  his  magnetic 
presence.  For  his  signature  certainly  has  a  fascination  in 
it.  A  physician  once  tested  the  Senator's  nerves  by  having 
him  extend  his  arm  to  full  length  and  hold  his  thumb  and 
forefinger  as  close  to  each  other  as 'possible  without  touch- 
ing. Many  of  us  will  say  that  he  need  not  have  looked  be- 
yond the  autograph.  ^ 


■'-■■'. : 


im&  i  • 


Kalakaua  R.  Long  live  the  King!  About  twelve  years 
ago  his  Majesty  came  to  the  United  States.  With  one  ex- 
ception, he  is  the  only  reigning  potentate  who  has  honored 
us  with  a  visit.  The  queen,  the  interesting  and  accom- 
plished Kapiolani,  has  recently  made  the  long  trip  across 
the  continent.  The  King  of  the  Sandwich  Islands  writes 
well.  In  this  we  may,  perhaps,  see  the  beneficent  influ- 
ence of  our  glorious  land  of  the  free,  for  nearly  all  the  trans- 
oceanic business  of  the  Hawaiian  Islands  is  done  with  the 
United  States.  It  is  pleasant  and  reassuring  to  know  that 
although  half  of  the  80,000  people  on  the  islands  are  full- 
blooded  natives,  and  hence  somewhat  inclined  to  uncivilized 
things,  they  all  are  governed  by  a  King  who  shows  earnest- 
ness  and  breadth  of  conception,  m  his  sign  manual  ;  wnich 
should  be  used  for  a  running  headline  in  all  the  copy  books 
needed  in  the  schools  of  the  Sandwich  Islands. 


& 


-^^ cS 


Ouida.  Each  reader  will  look  at  the  above  writing  with  a 
different  sensation.  To  one  it  will  seem  coarse,  unwoman- 
ly, pretentious  ;  to  another,  bold  and  strong  ;  to  a  third, 
commonplace  and  unattractive.  And  so  on:  for  in  this 
instance,  at  least,  judgment  yields  to  prejudice  or  bias. 
There  is  one  characteristic,  however,  that  all  can  appreci- 
ate together.  What  appears  to  be  flourish  is  really  under- 
scoring. Tl>e  same  weakness  is  found  throughout  her 
manuscript.  It  shows  earnestness  that  needs  to*  be 
propped  up,  and  it  may  indicate  rancor.  The  masculine 
form  of  the  letters  and  their  unconnected  march  are  not 
affected,  as  in  the  writing  of  some  fashionable  young 
ladies  nowadays.  Those  who  are  familiar  with  Quida's 
books  (and  who  is  not?)  will  hardly  be  surprised  at  her 
chirography.  It  seems  to  be  in  some  way  a  most  befitting 
thing.  It  is  not  handsome,  nor  is  it  particularly  ugly,  but 
it  compels  attention. 


D.  L.  Moody.  The  giant  is  not  a  creation  of  the  fancy 
or  a  thing  of  the  past — in  the  matter  of  autographs.  Now 
we  will  see  how  Mr.  Moody's  pen  work  conforms  with  his 
methods.  Here,  then,  is  a  paragraph,  found  in  a  Chicago 
paper,  which  does  not  in  any  way  refer  to  the  autograph  of 
the  celebrated  Evangelist :  "  One  thing"  about  Mr.  Moody, 
eloquent  or  ineloquent,  when  he  speaks  to  .an  audience, 
large  or  small,  he  does  not  spare  himself ;  he  is  not  afraid 
of  exertion.  It  is  as  if  he  would  not  tolerate  an  indolent 
fibre  in  his  being,  least  of  all  when  in  the  pulpit.  Nobody 
in  his  presence  ever  thought  to  say :  ?  Thou  sluggard.' 
There  are  a  good  many  ministers  who,  if  they  were  to  bear 
in  mind  that  remark  of  John  Brown,  l  It's  a  mighty  big 
thing  for  a  man  to  do  all  he  can,'  would  presently  find  a 
notable  increase  in  their  congregations  and  in  their  power 
for  good  over  them."  No,  Mr.  Moody  does  not  "spare 
himself."  It  is  not  necessary  to  be  in  his  presence  to 
know  that  he  is  not  a  sluggard. 


ir&y 


W.  Hogarth.  "See,  what  a  beauty!"  as  the  poet 
remarks  of  the  tiger  couchant.  Then  try  to  reconcile  this 
with  your  impressions  of  the  work  of  the  great  engraver  of 
the  first  half  of  the  last  century.  The  effect  will  bo 
mystifying.  It  is  easy  to  discover  the  artist  in  the  exact 
and  delicate  chirography,  but  the  characteristic  that*  the 
world  of  his  day  would  not  let  him  depart  from,  and  which 
the  world  of  to-day  always  sees  in  the  mention  of  his  name,, 
does  not  appear  at  all  in  the  above.  It  is  simply  impossible 
to  associate  this  handsome  autograph  with  the  bulging 
cheeks,  idiotic  leering,  and  beery  passion  of  the  vulgar  tales 
in  picture  that  were  the  delight  of  his  time  and  are  the 
wonder  of  the  present  day.  Hogarth  fried  painting  and 
high  art,  but  the  people  would  not  have  it  from  him,  and 
now  we  have  two  geniuses  to  admire — one  in  "  The  Rake's 
Progress "  and  similar  productions,  the  other  in  his  auto- 
graph. )The  critics  say  of  the  former  that  the  moral  of  hi& 
satire  is  always  stern,  true  and  unmistakable. 


* 


:LMMmJii(iil&: 


mlMm^SM^^^ 


wi 


-4 


Brigham  Young.*  A  plain  and  straightforward  bit  of 
penmanship.  In  this  respect  it  is  different  from  the  cele- 
brated Mormon's  theory  of  happiness.  It  is  a  good  signa- 
ture to  be  attached  to  a-letter  seeking  proselytes  to  the  so- 
called  faith,  for  the  least  wise  can  as  easily  read  it  as  print. 
It  is  entirely  praiseworthy  in  this  regard,  and  in  its  lack  of 
pronounced  character  there  is  something  soothing  tq  jaded 
eyes.  Jaded  hearts,  on  the  other  hand,  will  not  so  calmly 
regard  it.  But  there  is  nothing  uncanny  about  the  writing 
itself,  and  this  fact  gives  contradiction  to  the  startling  news 
of  a  few  months  ago  that  the  deceased  Mormon,  after  ten 
years  of  quiet  sleep,  had  suddenly  appeared  on  earth  again, 
to  oppose  in  person  the  threatening  ogre'  known  in  Utah 
and  elsewhere  as  the  Edmunds  bill. 


■ 


l.fXi^ 


T.  Carlyle.  This  is  an  instance  in  which  the  man. 
himself  stares  at  you  through  his  autograph.  What  a  weird, 
crabbed,  fantastic,  erratic,  cabalistic,  dyspeptic  looking 
thing  it  is  !  But  npte  its  rugged  strength  and.  originality. 
Who  ever  saw  such  a  T  before  >  It  is  a  cross  of  German 
and  English  equivalents,  just  as  the  Chelsea  Philosopher  is  a 
cross  of  the  German  and  the  English  mind.  Carlyle  ever 
had  a  queer  idea  of  capitals.  His  wonderfully  abstract 
essays  bristle  with  them,  and  add  their  mite  to  mystify  the 
reader.  He  does  not  care  what  you  think  of  his  chiro- 
graphy.  It  is  jagged  and  individual,  and  has  a  great  idea 
in  it  somewhere;  and  that  is  enough.  If  you  will  see  some- 
thing grand  and  beautiful  in  his  autograph,  he,  if  alive, 
would  perhaps  see  something  heroic  in  yours.  If  yes, 
then  you  must  indeed  be  a  demigod.  So,  do  your  best, 
and  say  you  see  the  splendid  light,  whether  you  do  or  not. 


l^^?/^^i 


W.  D.  Howells.  This  diminutive  specimen  of  the 
handwriting  of  our  best-paid  novelist  ought  to  be  a  source 
of  gratification  to  some  of  his  critics.  It  is  almost  effemi- 
nate, and  seems  to  justify  a  part  of  the  meaning  of  a 
writer  who  cynically  speaks  of  the  novelist  as  "  that  gentle 
apostle  of  man  niillinery."  Of  course  we  all  know  that 
this  is  unfair,  unjust.  True,  we  might  expect  such  a  signa- 
ture as  this  after  some  of  the  doses  of  sweetened  puritanism 
to  be  found  in  "  The  Minister's  Charge,"  or  after  the 
monotonous  commonplaceness  and  weak  humor  of  "  Their 
Wedding  Journey,"  but  it  hardly  accords  with  the  strong, 
perfect  character  pictures  to  be  found  in  that  masterpiece 
of  genuine  realism,  "A  Modern  Instance."  In  one  way 
this  specimen  is  characteristic.  It  is  subdued,  easy,  neatly 
connected,  and  inoffensive — just  the  kind  of  writing  to  suit 
a  drawing-room  taste.  And  yet  no  writer  of  the  day  has 
made  so  many  artistic  touches  and  photographed  so  truly 
people  and  phases  of  life  that  we  know  aire  actual.  Real- 
ism is  a  question  of  taste  and  courage.  Compare  this 
signature  with  Zola's  and  imagine  the  best  elements  of 
each  combined  in  one,  and  you  will  have  a  fit  sign-manual 
for  the  great  realist  yet  to  appear. 


Laura  D.  Bridgman.  Considering  the  conditions,  this 
is  perhaps  the  most  remarkable  signature  ever  penned? 
Made  blind,  deaf  and  dumb  by  a  fever  in  her  infancy,  Laura 
Bridgman  is  the  most  celebrated  exponent  of  the  possibilities 
of  the  senses.  She  has  developed  such  a  power  in  judging 
the  intelligence  of  a  stranger  by  a  touch  of  the  hand  that 
at  one  time  she  was  regarded  as  possessing  what  is  called 
the  "sixth  sense."  Equally  marvelous  is  her  command  of 
the  idea  of  proportion  as  exhibited  in  her  well  constructed 
and  interesting  autograph. 


W.  T.  Sherman.  Our  doughty  and  illustrious  warrior 
chief  (well  named  William,  signifying  bold,  valiant  ;  and 
Tecumseh,  meaning  big  injun)  photographs  his  conqueror 
nature  in  his  autograph,  of  which  he  is  pardonably  proud. 
After  virtually  closing  the  war  by  his  triumphant  march, 
through  Georgia- and  the  Carolinas,  he  turns  his  victorious 
eagles  toward  new  fields  of  conquest.  Note  the.  ambitious 
loop  of  the  T.  His  later  struggles  have  been  (see  daily 
papers)  against  the  pouting  graces  of  the  weaker  sex;  hence 
his  occasional  defeat,  though  gallantly  contesting.  Here  is 
the  latest  dispatch  from  the  field  of  battle  to  the  Spri?igfield 
Republican  :  "  General  Sherman,  who,  it  is  well  known,  has 
a  free  and  easy  way  with  pretty  girls,  came  along  where 
the  young  lady  sat  writing  a  letter  at  a  table^  Bending 
over  her  the  grizzly  old  veteran  picked  up  the.  half  finished 
sheet  and  turning  it  over  to  a  blank  page  put  his  autograph 
on  it  in  bold  form.  She  [sweet  enemy]  tore  it  in  pieces 
right  before  him  and  took  a  new  sheet,  baffling  the  presum- 
ing gallant,  who  beat  a  retreat."  Napoleon  could  have  done 
no  better. 


Ch.  Gounod.  This  is  said  to  be  not  an  "average  speci- 
men of  the  quality  of  the  handwriting  of  the  world-appre- 
ciated composer  of  "Faust,"  He  is  usually,  a  good  penman 
of  the  neat,  clear,  small-letter  style  prevalent  among  French- 
men of  the  less  extreme  type.  He  is  accused  of  eccentricity 
and  of  finical  faults,  which  do  not  appear  in  the  above 
signature^,  at  least' to  any  appreciable  extent.  It  has,  on  the 
other  hand,  the  stamp  of  ingenuousness  not  at  all  incom-  * 
patible  with  the  genius  which  is  acknowledged  to  be  his. 
Strauss  composed  enticing  melodies  in  an  artistic  way,  but 
Gounod  with  similar  resources  works  on  a  higher  plane. 
If  he  has  encroached  on  the  fantastic  and  unreal,  he  does 
not  give  more  than  a  hint  of  his  idea  in  this  autograph. 


-i 


CC^^€€4U^ 


P.  T.  Barnum.  It  is  useless  to  overhaul  this  sign- 
manual  for  the  meaning  that  most  everybody  who  believes 
in  the  mirror  qualities  of  handwriting  thinks  must  be  hid- 
den therein.  Of  course  by  this  is  meant  that  element  of  the 
intellect  which,  when  largely  developed,  4nay  be  called  the 
bump  ofhumbug.  The  greatest  of  all  showmen  has  certainly 
been  the  most  stupendous  of  all  humbuggers.  But  his  has 
ever  been  genuine  humbug.  He  knows  that  every  one  else 
knows  that  he  knows  that  everybody  knows  that  he  is  hum- 
bugging. Human  nature  loves  to  be  fooled,  but  hates  to  be 
swindled.  P.  T.  Barnum  always  gives  more  than  the  value 
in  the  money.  His  signature  is  as  unpretentious  as  his 
private  life. 


•mi 


C/"""7  C  <*~o       i^X 


Oscar  Wilde.  There  is  no  doubt  as  to  the  significance  < 
of  this  autograph.  Made  at  a  .time  when  the  craze  for  yal- 
lery-greenery  art  was  in  full  bloom,  it  shows  the  best  effort 
of  the  faithful  apostle  of  the  too-too  in  attempting  to  put 
the  soul  of  his  convictions  into  plebian  ink-trails.  As  there 
is  nothing,  similar  to  it  to  be  met  with  in  ordinary  places, 
it  may  not  have  been  libelous  to  attribute  to  him  the  remark, 
that,  "  to  disagree  with  three-fourths  of  the  public  on  all 
points  is  one  cf  the  first  elements  of  sanity."  Alas,  for  the  • 
star  of  Oscar  !  The  susceptible  young  lady  of  the  day  is 
now  truant  to  the  aesthetic  style  of  chirography,  and  she 
must  just  at  present  be  "dashing  and  straight  and  strong, 
not  romantic  and  yearning."  Some  day  she  will  return  to 
her  earlier  love. 


ifcaWi-  ».^ppie< 


-*-*. 


« 


G.  Washington. — -M.  Washington.  History  .  is  the- 
slave  of  circumstances,  and  as  the  foundation  of  the  gov- 
ernment is  the  greatest  event  in'a  nation's  career,  these  two 
autographs  are  the  most  enduring  pair  that  this  country  will 
ever  know.  The  one  who,  by  courtesy  of  the  times,  was 
called  "  Lady  Washington,"  and  the  other,  who  will  always 
be  known  as  "the  father  of  his  country,"  do  not  figure  at 
all  extraordinarily  in  their  penmanship.  Some  writer  has 
observed  :  "  What  firmness  and  dignity  is  expressed  in  the 
signature  of  Washington  ;"  but  these  qualities  are  surely 
difficult  to  discover  in  the  writing  as  a  whole,  or  in  the 
letters  separately.  They  are  not  seen,  for  instance,  in  the 
n's  the  s  the  cross  of  the  t  or  even  in  the  capitals.  Still, 
wjio  would  wish  that  these  autographs  had  been  pro- 
nounced in  style? 


IM- 





'0HM 


Byron.  Look  over  all  the  other  autographs  herein,  and 
then  judge  whether  it  is  straining  the  fancy  to  see  intense 
personality  in  this.  All  of  us  will  agree  in  thinking 
it  not  the  accepted  characteristic  hand  of  a  poet.  It  is 
genuine,  there  can  be  no  doubt  on  that  point.  The  pen 
was  guided  by  a  natural  impulse.  There  is  a  nervous 
energy  about  the  pen's  course  as  it  sweeps  back  upon 
itself  that  is  strikingly  apparent.  Now,  if  these  conclusions 
are  correct,  the  poet  throws  himself  into  his  autograph;  for 
Byron's  genius  was  of  all  geniuses  the  product  of  his  per- 
sonality. His  mind  created  all  those  unequalled  beauties 
only  in  relation  to  himself.  It  was  not  an  imaginary  hero, 
but  he  himself  who  "  gazed  upon  the  glittering  sea  below, 
whence  the  broad  moon  rose  circling  into  sight."  An 
astute  critic  says:  "  Never,  in  the  freest  flight  of  his  thoughts, 
did  he  liberate  himself  from  himself."  The  "  nervous 
energy  "  above  noted  cannot  be  missed  even  by  those  who 
read  Byron's  greatest  work  for  the  sake  of  the  moral  shock. 
The  grammatomancers  and  single-letter  analyzer's  will 
find  much  more  difficulty  in  this  autograph  than  has  the 
writer  hereof 


ii  h  a 


^i 


Don'd  C  Mitchell.  This  well-known  American  gen- 
tleman of  letter  is  prepossessing  in  the  every-day  attire  of 
his  name.  The  world  recognizes  him  quicker,  however,  in 
the  assumed  guise  of  "Ik  Marvel,"  as  he  gracefully,  half- 
pathetically,  gives  himself  over  to  the  "  Reveries  of  a 
Bachelor."  Successful  in  literature,  lie  has  lived  to  a  time 
when  he  finds  the  chief  duties  and  pleasures  of  life  in  de- 
voting his  energie's  to  finding  what  a  New  England  farm  is 
good  for.  He  writes- a  good  hand,  from  which  little  can  be 
guessed  as  to  his  general  convictions. 


CA 


G.  Dore.  Although  sloping  the  other  way,  the  signature 
of  this  peculiar  French  artist,  who  has  reached  a  height  in 
fame  the  "  why"  of  which  is  hard  for  many  to  understand,  at 
once  brings  to  mind  the  remarkable  parallel  it  make's  with 
that  of  Mademoiselle  Rosa  Bonheur.  But  in  the  case  of 
"  Golden  Gustave"  the  writing  is  characteristic.  Those 
weird,  night-mare  illustrations,  which  some  have  admired  so 
much  as, scenes  from  Dante,  may  easily  be  understood  to 
have  been  made  by  the  hand  that  executed  the  above 
chirological  fantasm.  "  His  works,"  says  a  fairly  apprecia- 
tive critic,  "  show  him  to  be  an  artist,in  spite  of  his  hastiness 
and  mannerism."  The  latter  word  is  easily  correct  ; 
"  hastiness^"  rests  on  the  assertion  that  the  artist  has  exe- 
cuted fully  fifty  thousand  designs.  His  sign-manual  is  a 
correct  guide  to  his  art. 


1 

J 

WM^9 

f/M 

\  iilfi^~~^[  dfll  ~Ky/?i?^fc<^HJ^\\W^ '  A 

ISH 

^^fefcWr^ 

§- 

• 

. — -  &..,.„■ 

. 

- 

. 

nillJllfffffL 

WSM^^X1^ 

7/pW^ilfMir^lM 

mff^mM^^^T^  *-  ^~Kife|l 

llfi^^^ 

SEJlll 

1 

• 

' 

' 

F.  S.  Key.  The  only  interest  which  attaches  to  this 
autograph  is  that  created  by  the  fact  of  its  haying  been 
made  by  the  hand  which  wrote  that  exceedingly  common- 
place but  immeasurably  popular  song,  The  Star-Spangled- 
Banner,  which  is  as  well  known  in  the  United  States  as  the 
Marseillaise  in  France,  or  the  Rhine  Song  in  Germany.  The 
song  was  suggested  and  partially  written  while  the  author 
was  detained  in  the  British  fleet  during  the  bombardment 
of  Fort  Henry,  of  which  he  was  an  anxious  .spectator.  He 
was  many  .years  District  Attorney  of  the  District  of  Colum- 
bia, and  in  the  early  part  of  the  century  had  some  reputa- 
tion as  a  poet.  There  is  little  to  be-said  of  his  chirography 
except  such  criticism  as  may  be  made  on  the  obscure  for- 
mation  of  the  initials. 


7P*~ 


Benja.  Franklin.  Here  are  seen  two  peculiarities  dis- 
tinctly united.  Every  letter  in  the  name  is  the  acme  of 
exactness  and  simplicity,  while  -attached  to  the  whole  we 
find  a  prolonged,  mysterious,  groping  sweep  of  the  pen, 
which  seems  to  have  wandered  from  the  plain  path  in  search 
of  the  unattainable.  We  will  go  to  no  less  a  person  than 
Sir  Humphrey'  Davy  for  a  quieting  explanation  of  the 
incongruity.  That  eminent  analyzer  of  nature  looks  into 
the  construction  of  Franklin's  mind,  and  finds'  that  it  was 
endowed  "  equally  for  the  uninitiated  and  for  the  philoso- 
pher." It  is  not  necessary  for  our  purpose  to  go  farther. 
The  world  loves  Poor  Richard  for  his  common  sense,  his 
simplicity.  We  see  these  elements  in  every  stroke-  of  his 
signature  proper.  The  philosophers  may  find  ail  the  com- 
fort they  wish  in  the  dreamy,  uncertain  flourish.  In  his 
youth  he  was  a  practical  printer,  and  early  learned  the  value 
of  plain  penmanship.,  but  he  had  enough  of  the  wandering 
spirit  in  him  to  cause  him  to  run  away  from  his  relatives. 
In  Franklin's  character  and  in  his  autograph,  the  "  unin- 
itiated "  idea  prevails. 


Bartley  Campbell.  Ordinarily  an  inquiry  into  the 
significance  of  an  individual's  handwriting  is  most  success- 
ful when  the  search  is  directed  toward  undercurrents,  or,  in 
the  case  of  an  extremist  or  pretender,  to  what  may  be 
termed  overcurrents. r  The  presence  of  unmistakable  in- 
dices may  be  regarded  as  significant,  yet  their  absence 
must  not  be  taken  as  proof  of  anything.  The  signature  of 
this  lamented  author  of  several  extremely  successful 
dramas  of  a  not  elevated  order  of  stage  art  is  one  from 
which  little  can  be  gleaned.  It  is  difficult  to  tell  what  im- 
pulse guided  the  pen  which  formed  that  unique  C  into  its 
combination.  His  final  breakdown  is  not  foreshadowed 
herein,  by  adopting  the  deductions  of  the  Philadelphian 
who  has  studied  the  chirography  of  many  brain-sick  un- 
fortunates. 


O.  W,  Holmes.  Without  inquiring  into  the  prevailing 
mental  tendencies  of  the  ever  brilliant  Professor,  let  us- 
take  his  autograph  as  a  good  specimen  of  a  recognized 
graphological  truth.  A  writer  for  the  Harpers  brought  the 
idea  out,  and  the  newspapers  immediately  seized  it,  and 
made  it  current  throughout  the  land.  In  condensed  form 
it  is  as  follows  :  "  The  handwriting  of  distinguished  Bos- 
tonians  is  usually  more  delicate  and  perspicuous  than  that 
of  distinguished  New  Yorkers,  as  any  one  who  has  ever 
received  epistles  from  Mr.  Lowell,  Dr.  Holmes,  Prof.  Nor- 
ton, or  the  late  Mr.  Longfellow  will  testify.  More  pains  is 
taken  in  forming  the  letters,  and  the  total  result  wears  ar( 
air  .rather  of  neatness  than  of  dispatch."  So  far  as  gener- 
ally known,  these  statements  have  not  been  controverted, 
and  each  reader  must  decide  for  himself  which  of  the  two 
styles  of  chirography  (and  hence  which  order  of  talent)  is 
preferable.       * 


Wilkie  Collins.  The  pen  has  taken  hold  of  the  pa- 
per in  this  instance,  with  remarkable  vim.  There  is  no 
hesitation,  no  wavering ;  it  hurries  on  its  course  in  a  most 
rapid  and  untrammeled  flight,  that  is  at  once  business-like, 
and  .not  suggestive  of  mere  fanciful  impulses.  But  the  cen- 
tral thought,  to  which  everything  else  seems  to  be  subsidiary, 
is  the  mysterious  and  wholly  characteristic  C,  which  is  orig- 
inal, and,  with  its  cross-scoring,  decidedly  odd.  It  captivates 
the  attention.  It  is  the  one  distinct  impression  which  the 
autograph  leaves  when  removed  from  sight.  •Wilkie  Collins 
is  the  acknowledged  master- of  plot.  His  fiction  lives  through 
its  singular  power  in  fascinating  the  reader  by  means  of  a 
peculiar  central  idea.  . 


f 


mm. 


<sfe^^C&^^^' 


Henry  Clay  Lukens.  Those  who  know  "  Erratic  En- 
rique "  do  not  care  anything  about  his  autograph  from  the 
point  of  view  of  these  pages,  for  it  is  no  more  suggestive  of 
anything  erratic  than  his  personality  is  of  any  one  not  all 
geniality  and  good  sense.  The  "  New  York  News  man  " 
has  sown  smiles  right  and  left  all  over  this  happy  land,  and 
"  Erratic  Enrique's  "  books  have  not  lost  public  appreciation 
as  those  of  mere  comic  writers  inevitably  do  in  a  short  time. 
Our  subject  has  for  many  years  been  one  of  the  hardest 
working  practical  journalists  in  the  country,-  and  is  now  in 
harness,  attached  to  one  of  the  liveliest  and  most  valuable  of 
our  weekly  journals.  "His  signature  is  a  good  enough  one 
for  any  man  who  doesn't  want  to  know  how  to  whine  or 
scratch,  and  always  trots  along  on  the  sunny  side  of  the 
street.  % 


John  Hancock.  What  a  signature  this  was  to  be- the 
first  on  the  great  Declaration  document.  It  is  a  sort  of  de- 
claration of  independence  in  itself.  There  is  no  getting 
away  from  its  Gibraltar  meaning.  Formidable,  honest,  and 
unmistakable,  the  autograph  of  the  President  of  the  Con- 
tinental Congress  does  full  justice  to  his  character.  History 
records  an  estimate  of  the  man,  which  is  faithfully  reflected 
in  his  autograph,  viz.:  "A  man  of  strong  common  sense 
and  decision  of  character,  dignified,  impartial,  he  always 
commanded  respect."    And  so  does  his  sign-manual. 


y^esy^scjz^ 


Florence  Nightingale.  As  one  of  the  most  famous 
women  of  the  century,  our  subject  sets  a  good  example"  in 
the  quiet  neatness  of.  her  signature,  which  seems  to  be  in 
keeping  with, the  syllabic  beauty  of  her  name.  Nor  is  it 
out  of  harmony  with  the  idea  which  has  caused  a  highly 
educated  and  brilliantly  accomplished  woman  to  devote  her 
life  most  intensely  to  the  alleviation  of  human  suffering. 
No  one  has  accomplished  so  much  as  she  in  perfecting  the 
hospital  system  of  the  British  army.  FlorenceJNightingale's 
ingenuous  autograph  would  probably  be  feelingly  cherished 
by  a  larger  number  of  persons  than  that  of  any  other  indi- 
vidual. 


Martin  F:  Tupper.  The  only  distinguishing  peculiar- 
ties  of  this  signature  are  the  overwrought  flourish,  the  ec- 
centric use  of  colons  for  periods,  and  the  self-sufficient  ap- 
pearance oj  the  T.  The  eccentricities  are,  of  course,  forced ; 
the  rest  of  the  writing  is  wholly  ordinary,  and  plain  withal 
This  is  fairly  descriptive  of  his  poetic  faculty.  Without 
u  Tupper,  the  immortal  Tupper,"  witty  literary  critics  would 
be  deprived  of  a  prolific  source  of  mirth.  .What  are  called 
"the  people,"  however,  have  liked  Tupper's  almost  gro- 
tesque platitudes  immensely,  and  forty  or  fifty  editions  of 
his  "  Proverbial  Philosophy  "  have  been  sold  in  England 
and  the  United  States.  No  one  of  authority  calls  him  a 
poet,  in  the  accepted  sense.  His  autograph  is  certainly 
commonplace  enough  in  its  natural  characteristics  to  satisfy 
his  admirers,  and  placidly  pretentious  enough  in  its  pecu- 
liarities  to  meet  the  humor  of  his  critics. 


Edwin  Booth.  Those  who  hav£  not  had  the  privilege 
of  seeing  and  hearing  the  great  tragedian  may  learn  some- 
thing 01  his  method  by  a  scrutiny  of  his  sign-manual.  The 
name  of  Booth  has  been  a.  synonym  for  splendid  stage  art 
for  years  and  years.  In  the  time  of  Gibber  Barton,  Booth 
played -the  part  of  the  ghost  in  Hamlet  in  so  great  a  way 
that  it  became  a  matter  of  record  for  unequalled  excellence. 
In  our  own  time  Edwin  Booth  stands  without  a  peer  in  his 
accepted  method.  The  very  quick  of  his  style  lives  in  his 
autograph.  It  is  preeminently  heroic.  And,  like  all  things 
heroic  nowadays,  it  occasionally  over-reaches,  and  shows 
something  like  a  snarl — perhaps,  bathos. 


Percy  B.  Shelley.  There  is  an  ethereal,  shadowy- 
effect  about  this  singular  chirography  that  is  not  lost  by  a 
continued  scrutiny.  It  is  idealistic,  illusory,  unsubstantial,, 
spirituelle.  And  of  such  was  the  genius  of  Shelley- 
Master  of  his  realms,  all  who  have  attempted  to  follow 
have  dropped  by  the  way,  surrounded  by  beauties  even 
there  they  could  not  hope  to  reach."  The  practical  Macau- 
lay  has  named  him  the  "poet  for  poets,"  and  most  of  us,, 
unless  we  belong  to  a  "Shelley  Society,"  will  prefer  his 
wayside  pieces.  In  its  own  way,  this  autograph  has  as 
much  that  is  distinctly  and  naturally  genuine  as  that  of  the 
poet's  fellow  wanderer,  Byron 


d^Cryifi^t^/^y^^Qll^vnt^ 


George  The  Count  Joannes.  There  is  no  occasion 
for  laughter  now.  The  great  and  only  original  "uncrushed 
tragedian  "  was  no  imposter.  He  was  genuine  to  the  mar- 
row, and  he  leit  no. doubt  of  his  entire  lack  of  spuriousness. 
He  was  an  emphatic  genius,  as  any  one  may  see  by  the  strong 
underscoring  he  gave  to  his  sign-manual.  His  writing  is  not 
sensational;  it  is  strong  and  earnest.  His  earnestness,  as  all 
old  theatre-goers  know,  was  such  that  he  was  wont  to  reject 
no  tokens  of  the  audience's  appreciation,  except  full-sized 
cabbage  buds,  over  ripe  gallinaceous  fruit,  and  the  like.  H*is 
titular  name  is  not  a  corruption  of  plebian  George  Jones,  but 
the  acknowledgment  of  a  divine  inheritance.  He  is  gone  now, 
and  we  should  gaze  on  his  autograph  as  on  that  of  one  who 
has  taken  more  than  a  mite  from  the  dreary  burden  which 
humanity  bears. 


WBH^SSWSS 


>-v  Vi 


Z/zrz*rz*sz, 


John  Howard  Payne.  This  handsome  running  sig- 
nature is  without  noticeable  characteristics  to  distinguish  it 
from  the  ordinary  style  of  many  good  penmen.  Payne  was  an 
actor,  dramatist,*and  general  writer  of  not  more  than  average 
attainments,  but  his  name  will  outlive  that  of  many  a  genius 
of  high  order,  in  connection  with  that  perennial  and  univer- 
sal song,  "  Home,  Sweet  Home,"  the  words  of  which,  and 
not  the  air,  originated  with  him.  This  song  is  said  to  have 
made  the  fortunes  of  all  first  connected  with  it,  except  its 
author.  He  suffered  the  hardships  of1  poverty,  which  his 
neat  and  accurate  chirography  might  have  averted  if  de- 
voted to  the, humdrum  duties  of  the  counting  room. 


"V 


XX  /P^u>O^L_ 


B.  P.  Shillaber.  Humorists  rarely  show  anything 
characteristic  of  their  quality  in  their  pen-marks  ;  but  as 
humorists  are  also  rarely  themselves  when  funny,  it  is 
hardly  reasonable  to  look  for  public-known  traits  in  their 
ink-tracings.'  The  fact  that  those  whose  business  it  is  to 
create  a  laugh  are  most  frequently  persons  of  serious  and 
even  gloomy  propensities,  has  been  remarked  in  every 
generation.  Without  attempting  to  discover  the  peculi- 
arity of  the  inner  spark  whence  ^springs  the  outer  flash  in 
this  most  universal  of  laugh  producers,  it  must  suffice  to 
know  that  the  above  is  one  of  "Mrs.  Partington's"  entirely 
acceptable  autographs.  ; 


Charles  Carroll  ^of  Carrollton.  The  bluest  of 
the  famous  blue,  blood  of  Baltimore  runs  through  every 
vein  of  the  signature  of  the, greatest  of  the  Carrolls  of  Car- 
rollton. The  indigo  hue  is  there,  whatever  acuteness  may 
be  necessary  to  distinguish  it,  for  C.  C.  of  C.  was  a  de- 
scendant of  the  old  Irish  kings,  the  inheritor  of  a  vast 
estate,  and  hence  one  of  the  richest  men  in  the  Colonies, 
the  last  surviving  signer  of  the  Declaration  of  Independ- 
ence, and  a  man  "  whose  manner  and  speech  were  those  of 
a  refined  and  courteous  gentleman."  We  may  admire  these 
patrician  pen-marks  without  reservation,  for  they  are  truly 
American.  Nor  must  we  regard  the  estate  attachment,  "  of 
Carrollton,"  as  aping  an  un-American  custom,  since  it  was 
used  to  distinguish  the  signer  from  a  kinsman  bearing  his 
name.  It  is  to  be  hoped  that  all  the  present  Carrolls  of 
Carrollton  are  not  less  democratic  in  their  aspirations  than 
the  signer  shows  himself  to  have  been  in  this  autograph. 


m. 


4 


R.Wagner.  There  is  no  doubt  that  this  is  the  com- 
poser's autograph,  but  as  the  letters  are  certainly  not  Ger- 
man nor  English,  nor  anything  else  except  Wagnerian,  so  far 
as  can  be  discovered,  it  is  somewhat  rash  to  say  what  they 
spell.  Nevertheless,  the  previous  assertion  is  authoritative. 
And  when  you  come  to  think  of  it,  there  is  no  reason  why 
this  autograph  should  not  be  regarded  as  an  authentic 
specimen.  It  embodies  the  musical  idea  of  its  author  to 
perfection.  His  doctrine  in  music  is  to  photograph 
thoughts  and  deeds  with  sound  by  the  avoidance-  of  melody, 
and  to  make  the  unhallowed  public,  see  the  invisible  by 
means  of  pamphlets  and  reprints  of  favorable  newspaper 
critiques.  He  has  conquered  the  public  and,  according  to 
one  of  his  standard-bearers,  has  overcome  even  his  ancient 
enemy,  the  French;  £pr,  as  this  interpreter  remarks,  the 
master  cannot  be  ignored  since  "  his  music  has  made  more 
noise  in  the  world  than,  that  of  all  other  musicians  put  to- 
gether." (No  italics  in  the  original.)  The  majority  of  us 
may  give  in  to  the  music,  but  never,  never,  to  the  auto- 
graph. 


^rt^Lrr 


Cu.  O'Conor.  Few  signatures  are  so  directly  charac-  * 
teristic  of  their  author's  intellectual  tenets  as  that  which 
dignifies  this  page.  One  who  cannot  see  unqualified 
strength  in  its  towering,  rugged  capitals,  must  deny  nearly 
every  palpable  suggestion  that  handwriting  can  offer.  In 
the  proper  spirit  it  is  not  difficult  to  discern  logical  vigor, 
clear  cut  purpose,  and  force  of  resolve  in  the  impressive 
outlines.  For  his  connection  with  the  historic  Slave  Jack 
case  and  with  the  prosecution  of  the  Tweed  Ring,  the  gen- 
eral public  will"  long  venerate  the  name  of  the  great  law- 
yer, but  it  is  among  his  fellow-laborers  we  must  go  for  the 
undoubtedly  just  estimate  which  recognizes  in  him  the 
leading  legal  intellect  of  his  time.  His  autograph  may  be 
regarded  as  the  shadow  of  his  mind. 


% 


ww^ 


-£fs2s?74f 


Robert  Burns.  All  who  are  familiar  with  the  writ- 
ings of  Burns  must  be  struck  with  the  singular  patness,  so 
to  speak,  of  his  autograph.  Properly  considered,  it  meets 
the  requirements  perfectly.  It  is  an  artless,  open,  school- 
boy sort  of  hand,  that  no  one  would  tjiink  of  noticing 
under  ordinary  circumstances.  And  (this  is  not  a  paradox) 
Burns  was  ordinary  in  every  way,  and  therein  lies  his  extra- 
ordinary genius.  No  other  poet  has  gone  to  the  verge  of 
inartificial  beauty  and  unforced  feeling.  His  Woodlark, 
with  its  realism  and  genuine  sentimental  cry,  "For  pity's 
sake,  sweet  bird,  nae  mair,  Or  my  poor  heart  is  broken, '** 
stands,  alone  of  its  kind.  He  wrote  things  as  remarkable 
for  their  indecency  as  anything  ever  penned.  No  sane  ad- 
mirer deifies  these.  He  slipped  into  ways  unnatural  to  his. 
life  impulse,  but  he  always  returned  to  himself,  and  in  his- 
thoughts  as  in  his  autograph,  open  simplicity  and  un- 
affected naturalness  are  the  characteristics. 


-^^JHcmri&A  CL(Jclufr<m. 


Th6mas  A.  Edison.  All  true  citizens  of  this  throbbing 
lancbaught  to  be  proud  of  a  man  who  can  write  his  name 
this  way  when  he  feels  like  it.  No  graphologist  dares  to  let 
his  fancy  play  around  these  upright,  half-print  letters.  The 
E  looks  slightly  suspicious,  however,  and  may  hint  at  some- 
thing. But  the  comet!  There's  the  mark.  This  wonder- 
ful phono-electro-magician,  following  the  general  law,  must 
put  himself  into  his  autograph  somewhere*  The  name 
proper  may  be  prosaic  and  .suggestive  of  cash,  but  that  im- 
mense sweep  through  the  regions  of  the  blank  tells  the,  true 
tale  The  comet  needs  no  interpreter.  Every  one  knows 
ivhat  its  mission  is  in  this  place. 


'»  ' »' 


R.  Bonheur.  Bold  design  and  picturesque  effect  are  the 
best  things  to  be  said  of  this  famous  artist's  sign  manual. 
True  it  has  an  animated  effect  that  may  be  called  typical 
of  her  best  efforts  on  the  canvas,  but  this  is  not  an  affirma- 
tion to  be  made  without  an  effort.  That  her  best  paintings 
are  those  of  animal  life  in  action  goes  unquestioned  ;  but 
that  the  spirit  of  the  "  Horse  Fair  "  and  other  productions 
of  a  like  nature  is  more  than  faintly  shadowed  in  the  above, 
is  too  much  to  say.  As  a  whole,  this  autograph  is  unsatis- 
factory, puzzling,  and  representative  of  little  that  will  stand 
for  the  quality  of  her  work. 


Francois  Coppee.  More  than  any  other  class  poets 
have  the  habit  (sometimes  conscious)  of  putting  their  mental 
quality  into  their  autographs.  This  specimen  of  the  hand- 
writing of  the  "  most  distinguished  French  poet  since  Victor 
Hugo,"  is  remarkable  for  its  photographic  effect.  We  will 
let  an  acute  analyzer  of  his  poetry  present  the  estimate  : 
"  In  poetry  as  well  as  in  personal  adornment,  filagree  is 
sometimes  very  charming.  A  noticeable  member  of  the 
filagree  school  of  poets  is  M.  Francois  Coppee.  He  fash- 
ions his  filagree  so  prettily  that  it  would  be  hard  to  deny 
him  the  n-ame  of  poet.  His  faint  little  melodies  in  the 
minor  key  win  us  like  seolian  murmurs  from  shadowland.'* 
Further  comment  is  unnecessary. 


Hernando  Cortez.  This  autograph  is  historically 
correct.  It  should  have  first  place  in  the  celebrated  Cist 
collection  of  eleven  thousand  autographs  of  as  many  illus- 
trious persons.  It  should  go  far  in  making  up  the  value  of 
the  $100,000  Reich  album. .»  Can  you  trace  the  individual 
letters  ? 


t 


« 


i    r'4m 


i       4 


*mm 


♦---• 


*r 


z^**«'