(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Open Source Books | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

Anonymous User (login or join us)Upload
See other formats

Full text of "The report at large of the coroner's inquest on Jane Watson, shot at Mr. Robinson's address, &c. ... : the verdict,--wilful murder, against Mr. Robinson's butler ..."

Ill 5 Jff S 
is ?^\ Ls 

fcH^ 



zlni 




A\\t-UNIVERS//, 










ttx 

24 

SB 



frHE 



REPORT, 

Ke, 




auf 







THE 

EPORT AT LARGE 

OF THE 

CORONER'S INQUEST 

ON 

JANE WATSON, 



AT MR. ROBINSON'S, IN OLD BURLINGTON-STREET; 

WITH 

MR. ROBINSON'S ADDRESS, &c. 

TO THE INQUEST, AT LENGTH. 



THE VERDICT, WILFUL MURDER, 

AGAINST 

MR. ROBINSON'S BUTLER, THE CORPORAL, 
AND TWO SOLDIERS. 



SPECIALLY REPORTED 

BY WILLIAM HONE, 

ONE OF THE EVIDENCE ; 

AND REPORTER OF THE EXTRAORDINARY PROCEEDINGS BEFORE 
THE CORONER'S INQUEST, ON THE BODY OF EDWARD VYSE, 
ALSO KILLED BY THE FIRING AT MR. ROBINSON^S. 



ILoiOum: 

PRINTED FOR WILLIAM HONE, 55, FLEET-STREET. 
1815. 



Price Eighteen-pence. 



J. M'Creery, Printer, Black-Horse-Court, London. 



StacK 
Annex 



SS 3 ! 
TO THE READER. 



t 

ON the CORONER'S INQUEST being held on 
JANE WATSON, who was mortally wounded 
on the ?th of March, 1815, at the same time 
that EDWARD VYSE was shot dead at the 
HON. JOHN FREDERICK ROBINSON'S, M. P. in 
Old Burlington- street, it became my duty to at- 
tend that Inquest to give evidence, as I had 
done upon VYSE's Inquest, touching the death 
of the deceased. 

This attendance afforded me an opportunity 
of taking down in writing, at the time, and 
reporting at length, the whole of the evidence, 
&c. before the Inquest. The columns of the 
newspapers being deluged by the influx of 
foreign news, they did little more than mention 
the Verdict. 

The very interesting ADDRESS, which Mr. 
ROBINSON delivered to the Inquest the ques- 
tions they put to him his answers and every 
thing that occurred during the REMARKABLE 
INTERVIEW, I have carefully narrated at length. 



VI 

My Circumstantial Report of the Extraordi- 
nary Proceedings before the Inquest upon 
Edward Fyse, and this Report of the subsequent 
Inquest upon Jane Watson, contain every parti- 
cular attendant upon the deaths of the unfor- 
tunate Victims; and present a faithful picture of 
the Scenes exhibited at Mr. Robinson's, from 
the time the Military entered the house, until 
after the fatal events, which the Verdicts of 
the two Inquests have pronounced WILFUL 
MURDERS. 

WILLIAM HONE. 

Z3d March, 1815. 



REPORT, 



FIRST DAY. 



JANE WATSON, resident at No. 5, Charles Street, 
Long Acre, widow, aged twenty-six years, was mortally 
wounded at the same time that EDWARD VYSE was 
shot dead by fire-arms discharged from the windows of 
the Honourable FREDERICK ROBINSON, in Old Bur- 
lington-street, on Tuesday, the 7lh of March, 1815. She 
languished until Friday Morning, the 17th, and then died in 
great agony in St. George's Hospital, where she had been car- 
ried on receiving the fatal wounds, and the following persons 
were summoned as an 

INQUEST UPON THE DECEASED, 
* CHANTREY, Eglintoun- street, Pimlico, Sculp- 



tor. 

WILLIAM BRAMWELL, Ebury-street, Brandy Merchant, 
(FOREMAN.) 

* THOMAS HALL, Grosvenor- place, Stable-keeper. 

* THOMAS CODING, Knightsbridge, Wine Merchant. 

GEORGE JUDSON, Ranelagh-street, Pimlico, Tinman. 

B 



8 
THOMAS CUNDEY, Ranelagh-street, Pimlico, Builder. 

* HENRY LEWER, Ranelagh-street, Piralico. Clerk at 

Messrs. Elliott's Brewery. 

CHARLES BINGHAM, Ebury-street, Pimlico, Gentleman. 

* JAMES PARMER, Arabella-row, Pimlico, Ironmonger. 
JOHN CULLEN, Knightsbridge, Appraiser. 

JOHN GOODENOUGH, Knightsbridge, Tailor. 
ROBERT BURN, Knightsbridge, Tailor. 

* JOHN PALSWORTH, King's-row, Pimlico, Bookseller. 

* JOHN HILL, Little Eaton-ttreet, Pimlico, Carpenter. 
THOMAS WOOTTON, King's-row, Pimlico, Farrier. 
RICHARD DUNN, Arabella-row, Pimlico, Appraiser. 

CHARLES CLEAVELAND, Ebury street, Pimlico, Vic- 
tualler, Red Lion. 

JOHN LINNEY, Pimlico, Tallow Chandler. 

JOHN JACKSON, Ebury-street, Pimlico, Victualler, Three 
Compasses. 

* WILLIAM CADBEY, Chapel-street, Grosvenor-place, 

Builder. 

* JOSEPH SALMON, Halkin-mews, Green Grocer. 
JOHN JONES, Ranelagh-street, Piralico, Linen Draper. 
THOMAS EDKINS, Ebury-street, Pimlico, Carpenter. 

Those persons whose names have this mark [ ] against 
them did not attend ; the rest were sworn as the Inquest. 



The Constable on referring the Coroner to the list of the 
persons summoned, said, that Mr. CHANTREY could not 
possibly attend upon the Inquest, as he was gone to take a 
model of LORD CASTLEREAGH. 

The following day, SATURDAY, at Half past twelve o' Clock 
precisely, being the time for which the Coroner's Inquest were 
summoned to meet at the sign of the TRIUMPHANT CHARIOT, in 
Halkin-slrecl, Grosvenor-place,at the back of Si. George's Hos- 
pital, the Reporter of this account of the proceedings attended a 
few minutes before the time, and on entering the room, ap- 
pointed for the reception of the Inquest, found the Coroner ex- 
amining JAMES RIPLEY, the Butler to Mr. Robinson. Two 
gentlemen who report for the Newspapers, and who took mi- 
nutes at the Inquest on EDWARD VYSE, were also present, but 
none of rhe Jury had arrived. 



JAMES RIPLEY, 
Butler to Mr. ROBINSON, stated to the following effect: 

That on Monday Evening, the 6th of March, the mob as- 
sembled at Mr. Robinson's house at about a quarter before Nine 
o'clock. A person had previously arrived at the house, and 
given notice that there was a great mob in St. James's Square, 
and that they were inquiring for Mr. Robinson's house. They 
shortly after arrived and destroyed the windows and railing in 
the front of the house, and broke in and began to destroy the 
furniture. The next morning, about half past ten, the house 
was assailed in like manner, and they forced an iron bar through 
the inner door; after which the horse-soldiers came up they 
were then dispersed by the soldiers. In the course of the two 
attacks, the iron railing, I think I may say the whole of it the 
stone work, and gate, and all in the front of the house, were 
forced down principally into the area. Witness does not know 
whether any of the iron railing was carried off. Some of the 
iron work was thrown on the balcony of the drawing-room 
windows. Most or the whole of the drawing-room windows 
were broken ; and the windows in thejhousekeeper's room were 
broken, but, perhaps, they were broken by the fall of the 
iron railing ; the window-shutters in the Drawing-room were 
forced or split by the things thrown. 



B 2 



10 

THOMAS THOMPSON, 

Assistant Surgeon at St. George's Hospital, Sworn. 

Deposed, that JANE WATSON was brought into St. 
George's Hospital about eleven o'clock at night, on Tuesday, 
the 7th of March. She had two wounds in the head, on the 
lower part of the scalp, covering the parietal bone on the right 
side of the head the two wounds were situated at about an 
inch in distance, one above the other. I have regularly at- 
tended her until the day of her death, which was yesterday the 
17th instant, when she died at about seven o'Clock, as Witness 
was informed. I have examined her head to day she was 
also attended by Mr. Brodie, assistant surgeon to St. George's 
Hospital. When Mr. Brodie saw the head, he had cat down 
upon the head, and removed a great many pieces of fractured 
bone. This day, on opening the head, we found a large abscess 
in the brain, under the bone, where that was fractured ; the 
bones between the two wounds, and in the neighbourhood of 
the wounds, were broken or splintered in many places ; there 
was a protrusion of the brain when she first came in. We 
(omul no shot, and suppose that if she had been struck by a ball, 
it had entered at the upper wound, and coine out of the lower 
wound. We entirely dissected the brain, there can be no shot 
there. The wound had more the appearance of being made by 
bull or shot, than by any thing else. The upper wound was 
a clean cut wound, the lower wound was more rough and 
ragged. 

JAMES RIPLEY, 
fhe uller t 

Asked if he might withdraw. He said that Howe and two 
or three others, whose depositions had been taken before the 
Inquest on Edward Vyse, were below, ready to be examined. 
By permission of the Coroner he withdrew. 

ANTHONY CELL, Esq. fht Coroner, 
was not present. 

JOHN HENRY CELL, Esq. his Son, 
officiated as Coroner. 

The Coroner then told the witness THOMAS THOMPSON, that 
as he might perhaps wish to go back to the hospital, he should 



11 

be sent for when he (the coroner) was ready For him, for there 
were not yet enough of the jury assembled to permit him to 
administer the oath ; but two or three of the Inquest arriving 
almost immediately, and twelve in number being present, the 
coroner called over the list, the inquest was sworn, and WI LLI AM 
BRAMWELL appointed Foreman. Proclamation was then 
made for all persons who could give evidence touching the 
death of the deceased, to draw near and attend the court. 

The CORONER read the deposition of the witness, THOMAS 
THOMPSON, he being present ; not having withdrawn. 

The witness added, that the injuries he had described were 
the cause of her death; but although he. was persuaded that 
the wounds were inflicted by shot, yet from not having found 
any, he cannot positively tell what actually occasioned the 
death of the deceased. 

The jury now proceeded to St. George's hospital to view the 
body. There was a hole on the right side of the head, above 
the ear, of an irregular form, and about an inch and a half 
in diameter. The brain having been previously dissected, its 
cavity was empty. The hair had been cut off from the head. 
The features were regular and handsome, and the countenance 
was not unpleasing even after ten days of great suffering, 
and an agonizing death. 

After the inquest had viewed the body, they returned to their 
room, at the TRIUMPHANT CHARIOT public house. 

JAMES RIPLEY, the butler, being present, the co- 
rener proposed to read over the deposition of this witness, 
which had been taken before the inquest, held on the 
8th, 9th, 10th, and llth of March, on the body of EDWARD 
VYSE ; and also the deposition of the same witness, which the 
Coroner said he had been taking this day, before the Jury had 
assembled, in order to save the jury time. The coroner further 
observed, that if the jury wished to ask any questions of the 
witness, in explanation, they could do so. 

The coroner then proceeded to read the above-mentioned 
deposition of JAMES RJPLEY. 

The DEPOSITIONS of this and other witnesses before the 
coroner's inquest on the body of EDWARD VYSE, being read as 
evidence, it is necessary to refer to the Report of the evidence 
upon that occasion.* 

* See " A CIRCUMSTANTIAL REPORT of the EXTRAORDINARY 
EVIDENCE, PROCEEDINGS, and INCIDEKTS before the CORONER'S IN- 
QUEST on the body of EDWARD VYSE, who, on Tuesday Evening, 
the 7th of March, 1815, was shot dead from the parlour windows of the 
house of the Hon. F. Robinson, M. P. in Old Burlington Street. 
Specially reported, and revised from minutes taken by the Inquest. 
With the Surgeon's Report and other documents. By WILLIAM 
HONE, me of the Evidence" with Wood-cut Illustrations, 6vo. 2>. 6</. 



The reading ofjAMES RIPLEY'S deposition by the coroner was 
interrupted by the jury putting questions to the witness. The 
points upon which they required explanation are printed in 
Italics, and inserted within crotchets [thus] with minute re- 
ferences below to the particular parts of the " Circumstantial 
report of VYSE'S inquest," in which they may be found. 



Sutler to Mr. Robinson , sworn. 

[The corporal told me he came for the protection of Mr. 
Robinson's house.*] 

Jury. About what time did the soldiers arrive? 

Witness. About six or seven o'clock. About that time as 
near as I can tell. I cannot say exactly. 

[The witness look the man by the collar^ Stc.f] 

Jury. This is very important. There certainly could not 
have been that violence that could have justified the firing, if a 
man could have been taken from the middle of the people in 
this manner, by a single individual. 

Witness. 1 did take the man. There were a great many 
people. 

One of the jury. It appears to me, that if there had been 
a dozen peace officers doing their duty, the life of this poor 
young woman would not have been lost. 

The jury expressed their persuasion to the same effect. 

Jury. Was the pistol loaded or not? 

Witness. I desired my lellow servant 

Jury. Answer directly yes or no. 

Witness. It was with swan-shot. 

[ After this witness loaded the pistol again, &c. ^c.J] 

Witness. 1 loaded with shot. 

Jury. And where did you fire? 

Witness. Into the area. 

Jury. Are you sure you fired into the area? 

Witness. I am sure that I fired in the direction of the area. 

There was no peace officer in the house. 

I was obliged to keep away from the window. When I fired 
I advanced from the folding doors to the window, and fired. 
I fired because I presumed the under part of the house was in 
danger. The pistol was loaded the night before after the first 
attack. When witness addressed the mob, he felt secure, be- 

* Circ. Rep. of VYSE'S Inquest, p. 24, 
f Ibid. p. 25. 
t Ibid. p. 26. 



13 

cause the military was in the house. The mob was quiet 
whilst witness was talking to them. They had thrown in not 
half a minute before. Witness did not see the deceased fall. 
Had no authority to fire any farther than to prevent people 
coming into the house. Had no police in the house. Was 
protecting his own property as well as Mr. Robinson's. 

Jury. What time elapsed after taking the man into cus- 
tody, and the death of the woman ? 

Witness. I suppose about two hours, 

Jury. Will you say it was one hour. 

Witness. I really cannot say. 

Jury, Say as nearly as you can. 

Witness. I think about two hours . 

Jury. Will you swear it was oHchouv ? 

Witness. I cannot say exactly, Sir. I should think it was 
about two hours. 

Jury. Will you upon your oath swear it was half an hour. 

Witness. I really do not know, it is impossible for me to say. 

After several other questions by the Jury to the same point, 
to which they could obtain no satisfactory answer, they com- 
plained of the witness's equivocation, and he was ordered to 
withdraw. 

WILLIAM SUTTON, 
Footman to Mr. Robinson, sworn. 

The Coroner proceeded to read the deposition of the witness 
in his presence : 

[One of the soldiers took the plslol, 6-c.*] 

Jury. C ould you point out the soldier again who fired the 
pistol ? 

Witness. I don't know whether I could or not, Sir. 

Witness heard the people say they would murder the ser- 
vants. He was in the passage. He heard a voice say it. One 
voice certainly. I was in the back room and heard it. 

The Jury put various questions to the witness, to learn if he 
could identify the soldier who Bred the pistol, which, he an- 
swered in a way that the Jury deemed evasive. 

The witness examined. 

Tuesday evening, the 7th of March, about eight o'clock, 
the mob threw and forced open the shutters that were fastened. 
Heard a voice say they would break into the house. They 
forced on some time. The soldiers fired blank cartridges, as 
they told witness. The Corporal told him. Witness believed 

* VYSE'S Report, p. 27. 



it was the corporal by his voice. Knows the corporal. Should 
know the corporal from a juryman in a corporal's dress. They 
fired from the parlour windows and fan-light. They did not 
fire till the windows were broken open. Witness gave every 
man a horn of liquor a piece, and the corporal another horn. 
It was a small horn ; it does not hold half-a-pint a piece. -. 
Witness did not say any thing to the soldiers when he heard the 
voice threaten to break in. Does not know whether the sol- 
diers heard it. Witness never fired a gun or pistol off. Knew 
none of the soldiers by name. Ripley fired. Does not exactly 
know how many shot he gave his fellow servant. Never went 
further than from the parlour to the hall. 

'jury. Did you say any thing to the soldiers about firing? 

Wilness. I did not. 

Jury. What, did nothing pass after the firing, about the 
people that were shot? 

Witness. No, nothing. I did not hear any thing said at 
all. A soldier asked witness for the shot. Witness fetched 
the shot for the protection of the house. It was got after the 
Monday night. 

Jury. Who ordered you to get the shot? 

Wilness. Nobody ordered me to get the shot. 

Jury. Who ordered you to get the pistol? 

Witness. The butler asked me to get the pistol. 

The Jury inquired where he got the shot from; He avoided 
the question much, but at length said that he got it from 
Lord Buckinghamshire's; from his under-butler ; from Robert 
Packer, he thinks his name was. Had got the pistols from 
there. Was there and saw the shot there, and asked them to 
give him some. The soldier asked him for the shot. 

Jury. By what, or whose authority did you get the shot ? 

Witness. By nobody's, I got it of myself. 

Jury. What conversation had you with your master after 
Monday night ? 

Wilness I had noparticnlar conversation ; Mr. Robinson was 
not in the house on Monday night ; he dined out, slept out, 
dressed out. Witness saw Mr. Robinson on Tuesday morning. 

Jury. How long was it before the young woman met with 
her death that you saw Mr. Robinson. 

Wilness. I cannot tell exactly. Witness dressed Mr. Robin- 
son Tuesday evening. Mr. Robinson gave no directions to 
witness. 

Jury. What conversation did you have with Mr. Robinson. 

Wilness. I cannot tell. 

The witness being repeatedly pressed with questions to the 
same effect, at length said that Mr. Robinson told him he 
expected soldiers and civil power in the house, and that Mr. 



15 

Robinson sent him home to say, that if the soldiers were outside, 
they were to come inside, but when the witness got home, they 
were inside already. The witness could not tell whether Rip- 
Jey addressed the mob or not. He might have done it. Wit- 
ness did not know, although he was in the parlour. He could 
not say. 

The Jury considered the witness to evade the questions. 

Jury. Have you ever spoken to the soldier that fired the 
pistol since? 

Witness. I have spoken to all of them. 

Jury. But have you not spoken to that soldier iu particular? 

Witness. I spoke to no one soldier in particular. I spoke to 
all of them. 

Jury . Do you know Mathews ? 

Witness. I know the man I gave the shot to. 

Jury. You do know him ? 

Witness. I think I should know the man again. 

When the firing took place, the witness heard the report of 
a gun at the same time that the pistol went off: they were very 
nearly fired together about the same time. Witness did not 
hear the soldiers say they fired shot. After the firing of the 
pistol and gun, there was no more firing : as soon as the firing 
was over, witness heard a man was killed or wounded : recol- 
lects no conversation afterwards : believes the pistol was fired 
first cannot be positive. The man whom I gave the shot to, 
and whom I saw load it, I saw fire it ; he was one of the pri- 
vates. Has spoken to them all since : thinks he could point 
out the man who fired the pistol. The house was assailed at 
the time the pistol was fired : there were stones and brickbats ; 
a great number of stones was thrown together: there was 
throwing together. The soldiers went to the window, and my 
fellow-servant, when he fired; and when he addressed the 
mob. 

Jury. Did any other of your fellow- servants see Ripley give 
the soldier the pistol? 

Witness. I think the coachman did he was standing by. 
The coachman, the witness, the under butler, and the groom, 
were in the room together: witness considered his life in 
clanger was afraid of it, notwithstanding he was in the back- 
parlour. Did not know that an accessary to a murder was 
guilty of murder. Witness got the pistol on Monday, and the 
shot on Tuesday. Mr. Robinson did not tell him to get it 
had no conversation with the butler, when the soldier was 
going to fire on the people : did not think any thing about 
it, whether wrong or not did not think about it at all. 

Before the examination of the next witness, the Jury objected 
to the Coroner's reading over to each witness his deposition 



16 

before the Inquest held on Edward Vyse. They wished (o 
examine the witnesses themselves, to enable them to judge of 
the consistency of their evidence on that occasion, with their 
evidence on the present. 



WILLIAM SMITH, 

Coachman to Mr. Robinson, sworn. 

On Tuesday, about 8 o'clock, the witness saw people out- 
side there were six soldiers and a corporal inside the house : 
a little time after, stones and, he believes, brickbats were 
thrown, and broke open the windows. Sutton was in the back 
room' the folding doors were open. Does not know how the 
shutters were fastened : they were broken open several times 
before they fired. Heard one of the soldiers ask Sutton if he 
had got any small shot? Did not see any given does not 
know what they loaded with. Heard the soldiers tell the mob 
they fired with blank cartridge cannot tell how the shutters 
were fastened. When the shutters were broken open, they put 
chairs against them, or tacks, or any thing at hand ; they had 
not time to fasten them. Witness was alarmed for his life. 

[Mr. CELL, the Coroner, now arrived ; and, after remain- 
ing about an hour, withdrew.] 

The soldiers had some supper; perhaps a little after eight. 
Does not know what they had to drink ; saw them drinking 
some ale. Witness was close to the soldiers when he gave the 
soldier the shot : heard no conversation amongst them ; heard 
no orders to them to fire, by the corporal, the butler, or any 
other person : gave no orders himself. The coachman had the 
small pistol. Ripley fired his pistol off some time before the 
last firing : should know the man who fired the pistol : believes 
that if the young man himself had been called in at the former 
examination, he would have said himself that he had fired the 
pistol. Does not know how many soldiers were in the front 
room at the time of the firing: thinks that the soldier fired the 
pistol from the window nearest to the street door. Heard the 
cry of murder after it was all over. Did not hear the soldiers 
say any thing afterwards. Was in the parlour at the last dis- 
charge. There were two or three firings, as quick as possible, 
after the soldier had fired the pistol. Believes there was firing 
over the fanlight. Saw the soldier fire the pistol from the 
window next the street door. Cannot say which soldier fired 
the pistol. Did not see Mr. Robinson on Tuesday. Witness 
had a pistol in his pocket, which he received from Sutton. 
Sutton did not tell him what it was for : Sutton did not say any 
thing to him. Did not tell him to do any thing with it, nor 



17 

what it was for. Did not tell him it was loaded: nothing 
passed when Sutton gave him the pistol. Did not ask him to 
take it. Does not know whether it was loaded : cannot tell 
whether it was loaded or not. Witness said nothing to Sutton 
when he took it. Sutton might have asked witness to take the 
pistol. Recollects that Sutton gave it him to protect himself. 

Jury. Was it loaded, or not? 

Witness. 1 did not examine it. 

Does not know whether it was loaded or not. Upon his oath 
does not know whether it was loaded or not. Never said it 
was loaded. Swears he never said that it was loaded, or that it 
was not loaded. Did not examine the pistol : did not see 
it loaded. Heard nothing from Sutton of his getting shot from 
Lord Buckinghamshire's. 

Heard the soldier ask William Sutton for the shot. Witness 
is sure he heard two or three guns go off altogether, at the time 
the pistol was fired. Witness then heard the cry of murder : 
he then went down stairs. Witness was frightened then; but 
not so frightened as he had been before. At the time of the 
firing, there had been throwing. At the instant the soldiers 
were firing, the people were throwing into the house. The 
soldiers said nothing when the cry of murder was heard nor 
the servants, nor himself. Saw no Horse- Guards. 

MRS. BRITTON, 

Of No. 5, Charles- street^ Long Acre, 

Stated, that JANE WATSON, the deceased, lodged in the wit- 
ness's two pair of stairs back room. The deceased was a 
widow, and had been married twice ; both her husbands had 
been drowned ; her last husband had been dead about two 
years. On the day she was mortally wounded, she was de- 
pressed ii, her spirits. She said to the witness in the fore- 
noon, " To-morrow will be two years since my husband was 
drowned." She told the witness she should go to Somerset- 
house, and inquire about her husband's affairs. She went out 
with the papers relating to her husband's concerns between one 
and two, and returned in the afternoon. A few minutes before 
eight the deceased went out again, and the witness heard, about 
a quarter before eleven, that she had been shot in Old Burling- 
ton-street. The deceased had probably gone to Burlington- 
street through curiosity ; but was the last person in the world 
that the witness should in the least suspect ot being riotous, or 
any thing like it. She was a remarkably well-disposed, dis- 
creet, and amiable young woman, and, as the witness under 
stood, had just got a situation as dresser in one of the theatres. 
The deceased has left a fine little girl, between six and seven 



18 

years of age, an orphan. The deceased's mother keeps a little 
public-house at Plumstead, near Woolwich, but is not in cir- 
cumstances to enable her to bury her daughter. The child is 
upon the parish, who allow half-a-crown a week towards its 
support. The witness concluded by expressing a hope, that 
the gentlemen present might be able to do something for the 
poor orphan. 

. The above witness not being able to state any thing touch- 
ing the death of the deceased, was not sworn. 

AMELIA DAVIS, 

Of No. 2, Duke's Court, Duke-street^ St. James' 's, widow, 
Sworn . 

Witness has been a widow above a twelvemonth. Knows 
nothing of the deceased. Never saw her before the night of 
her death-wounds. On Tuesday evening, the 7th of March, 
witness put her children to bed, and went to Berkeley-square. 
She left home at half past eight exactly; looked at her watch 
the moment before she went out ; went merely out of curiosity 
to see Lord Darnley's, in Berkeley-square, and other houses, 
which she heard in the course of the day had been damaged. 
Went quite round Berkeley- square. Looked at Mr. Yorke's 
house, in Bruton-street ; stopped looking at Mr. Ycrke's house 
some time. Entered Burlington-street from Clifford-street. 
There were then very few persons in the street; it was just 
about nine o'clock ; there were about twenty persons about the 
nd of the street. The horse-guards were in the street ; they 
were riding two and two up and down the street. I was stand- 
ing on a step with two young women. The deceased was 
standing there when I went. The people walked about. The 
horse-guards soon drew up in a line before Mr. Robinson's 
house, and then, on the word of command, they all went away 
together. I remained there, and the deceased too, and we 
talked quietly between ourselves about the Corn Bill, saying 
what a pity it was that they should destroy the houses, and 
such like, because it would do no good ; it would only make it 
worse. I think it was I who said so. The deceased agreed 
that it was a pity to destroy people's houses, and a pity that 
people could not keep their boys in, and not let them come to 
such a place as that. A few boys had began to collect opposite 
the house. The people said what a pity it was they should 
suffer boys to throw stones. There was not a great collection 
of boys. Saw some of the boys. There were people walking 
before the house, passing and repassing. There were some of 
all kinds, men, women, and children. There were a few more 
collected after the horse-guards went. The men and women 



19 

gassed through the boys, but did not mix with them, as wit- 
ness perceived. There were a few stones thrown. The wit- 
ness walked up and down the street about three times, on the 
side of the way opposite to Mr. Robinson's house, the deceased 
having hold of her arm. It must have been after nine when 
the guards went. Cannot exactly say exactly how long after the 
guards went that the stones were thrown. Did not see any 
thing thrown. Heard stones thrown at Mr. Robinson's house, but 
did not see them thrown. I thought at the time I was walking 
there, I was as safe as if I had been in this room ; but before 
this, being near Clifford-street, I heard guns go off, and then 
I returned to the step. The people were not off the pavement ; 
they were not in the middle of the road. Cannot say how 
many. Witness does not think more than fifty. The deceased 
never left witness's arm all the evening. Cannot say how 
many not more than fifty, if so much, were attracted by the 
firing of the guns. 

The deceased and I then walked only the space of two houses, 
when she fell from my arm. I heard three or four guns go off; 
to the best of my belief there were three or four. She fell, 
and I was in a float of blood myself, from being hit by a shot. 
1 felt my jaw very much shattered. It took a small piece out 
of my chin. The deceased lay on the pavement some time be- 
fore she was carried away. The Horse-Guards, when they 
came up, said, " Bear the bodies off." The deceased lay near 
twenty minutes before she was carried off to Mr. Tebbs's, in 
Bond-street. There were three bodies laying when the Horse* 
Guards said " Bear off the bodies." Those were the words 
they used. The people did not appear to be riotously disposed. 
Witness was in Burlington-street from nine till the deceased 
was shot. Saw the deceased EDWARD VYSE laying just by the 
kirb. The people were principally on the pavement opposite 
Mr. Robinson's street on the side of the way opposite to Mr. 
Robinson's house there was room on the pavement for people 
to pass and repass. It did not appear to witness that the people 
were riotously disposed. If witness had thought there had 
been any danger, she should not have remained. Saw the, 
lower shutters of Mr. Robinson's house open and shut a little 
way several times, for people inside to look out. Witness 
could see the hands that opened the shutters, but could not see 
faces. The upper shutter opened and shut twice; it was 
opened much wider than the others. She could see the bodies 
of persons inside ; but whether military or not, could not tell. 
At one of the times when the lower shutters were opened and 
shut, witness saw the flash, and heard the report from the 
vacancy between the shutters. 

Coroner, " I wonder that you did not go away then." 



20 

Witness^-" I did not think there was any danger. There 
were very few people. The people did not think they were 
firing any thing but powder. It was not what could be called 
rioting." 

PHILIP CHAFFEY, 

Footman to Lord Somerville, 28, Hill-street^ Berkeley -square^ 
sworn. 

[This witness was sent by Lord Somerville, to give evidence 
before the Inquest, in consequence of his Lordship having 
been made acquainted by him with what he had seen of 
the affair in Old Burlington-street.] 

The witness was in Old Burlington-street about five minutes 
before the deceased was shot, on Tuesday evening, the 7th in- 
stant. Witness was passing accidentally through the street. 
It was ten, or a little before ten o'clock. There were very few 
people in the street. About thirty. Some were opposite to 
Mr. Robinson's house. There were no Horse-Guards in the 
street. There was no riot; but as boys will do, they threw a 
stone at the house, and there was a rattling. It might have 
been thrown at the windows. It might have been a stone or a 
log of wood. Upon which there was firing of guns from the 
windows. Cannot say whether it was one or two, or more. 
The witness was hit with something at the upper part of the 
face, near the right eye. Was about twenty yards from the 
house. It left no mark. The deceased fell just before me on 
the ground. I nearly fell over her. She lay on the pavement 
of the opposite side of the way to Mr. Robinson's house. I 
said to a tall thin woman, who then stood by, " there is a woman 
down; whether she is wounded or fell down I cannot tell." 
We then saw the blood coming from her mouth. In about 
five minutes the horse soldiers came. At the time of the firing 
there was no disposition to riot ; the people were very quiet, 
only that something was thrown at the house; a stone or some- 
thing was thrown at the house; a stone or something. 

THE CORONER read the deposition of Richard Burton, the 
Corporal, before the Inquest on EDWARD VYSE. 

ADJOURNED until MONDAY next, at half past 
Twelve o'clock. 



;. ' 



SECOND DAY. 



AT A MEETING of the INQUEST, held at the Triumphant 
Chariot, in Halkin street, Grosvenor-place, on MONDAY, 
the 20th day of March, 1815, at half-past twelve o'clock, 
pursuant to the preceding adjournment. 

ANTHONY CELL, Esq. the Coroner, 
was not present. 

JOHN HENRY CELL, Esq. 
officiated as Coroner. 

GEORGE ULPH, 

Private in the 3d Regiment of Foot Guards, sworn. 

I went into Mr. Robinson's house on Tuesday, the 7th of 
March, at about six o'clock, perhaps about half an hour after- 
wards. Graves was put my partner at the kitchen door. We 
were there all the evening. We never moved. Stones came 
against the door, and into the area. Against the kitchen win- 
dows and against the door. There were a great many stones 
thrown. Could hear the voices of a great many persons in the 
street. Could not hear any thing that was said. Thinks the 
persons in the parlour might have heard better than he could 
below. Cannot say whether there were one hundred stones 
thrown, or not, or what number. We had a little beer, not 
very strong beer ; it might have been ale. Had no beer from 
any public-house ; had not more than a pint altogether ; had it 
out of a horn. Did not hear the servants say any thing after all 
was over. None of the servants was with us at the kitchen 
door. The Horse-Guards came up as soon as we got up stairs. 
The corporal did not order us to do any thing after we 
came up. 

Jury. During the time you were at the kitchen door, was 
there any report of a pistol as having been fired down the area 
of the kitchen ? 

Witness. None whatever. 

Jury. No rattling of shot down the area, as if fired from 
above? 

Witness. None. 



There were a great many stones thrown, they broke the 
shutters open several times. 

One of the Jury stated that the shutters of the house were not 
broken they were not destroyed. 

Never heard any body fire into the area. To the best of my 
knowledge no person fired into the area. If any person had 
fired into the area from the parlour window, witness must have 
heard it. I cannot tell exactly when the firing began. Graves 
was stationed with me. When I came up, the parlour was all 
dark. Cannot tell who was then in the parlour. Cannot.tell 
who the men were that were stationed in the parlour, nor 
which men were at the hall door. The butler gave us the 
beer. Cannot tell whether it was the man that had the pistol. 
Did not see any man with a pistol. Cannot tell how the par- 
lour window shutters were fastened. Saw them when he came 
up. Did not see them broke one was broken. 

A Juryman stated that the pannels of the shutters seemed 
about three-eighths of an inch thick. 

Received and returned twenty-one rounds of ball cartridge 
entire. Returned them to Jones, the armourer. My comrade 
never fired whilst we were at the kitchen door. Nobody came 
down to us during the time we were stationed there. 

The Jury requested that JONES, the Armourer , might be 
sent for. i; ^ 

We returned our ammunition in the pouches to the Ar- 
mourer. It is the duty of the corporal to see the ammunition 
returned. It is the duty of the corporal of the company. It 
was not his duty. 

A Letter being delivered to the CORONER, by the Constable, 
from the HON. JOHN FREDERICK ROBINSON, M. P. who was 
waiting outside the Inquest Room, the Coroner read it to the 
Jury. The following is a 

(COPY.) 

Monday, March 20, 1815. . 
" SIR, 

" Having understood that, in the course of the 
Inquest held before you on Saturday last, several questions 
were asked of my servants in which my name was mentioned, 
I feel it to be my duty to offer myself to you and to the Jury, 
in order to give any explanation that may be required upon the 
subject. I should wish, also, to state to the Jury some cir- 
cumstances connected with the state of my house, previous to 
the different attacks upon it, which appear to me not to be 
immaterial to the justice of the case. 



23 

11 1 request lo be favoured with an answer, and to know 
whether my testimony is to be admitted or not. 

I am, Sir, 

Your most obedient humble servant, 

T. ROBINSON. 

Addressed to the Coroner. 

The Jury ordered Mr. Robinson to be admitted. 

MR. ROBINSON'S INTERVIEW WITH THE JURY. 

Mr. ROBINSON entered the room attended by a gentleman 
who expressed some doubt as to the propriety of his ap- 
pearance. 

The CORONER said there could be no deubt of his right to be 
present if he thought proper, that it was an open Court, into 
which any person might come that chose. He could not pre- 
vent any person coming in it was an open Court. The 
gentleman seated himself for a minute or two, and then with- 
drew. 

Mr. ROBINSON alluded to his letter to the Coroner, and said 
he came in consequence of some questions having been asked of 
his servants, on Saturday, respecting what had taken place 
between him and them before the accident, and that he wished, 
himself, to explain and state to the Jury every thing in his 
power. 

Mr. BR AM WELL, the Foreman, stated to Mr. Robinson, 
that he had inquired of Mr. Robinson's servant what particular 
conversation had taken place, on Tuesday, between Mr. Robin- 
son and the servant. 

Mr. ROBINSON delivered himself in words to the following 
effect. 

" I cannot recollect any particular conversation that took 
place. I presume that I am asked to state the particulars of 
what took place that morning (Tuesday) and the preceding 
evening. I think I saw the servant in the morning of Tuesday, 
who stated that the people had attacked the house that morn- 
ing, that they had entered it, and destroyed a figure up stairs 
in the window. 

" I wished to state the cause of the house being attacked, 
and the reason of my application to the Secretary of State for 
protection. It was for the purpose of informing the Jury to 
this effect, that I certainly did desire my servant Ripley to state 
to the Jury, what took place on the Monday, which I understood 
he did. " 

The Jury said that RIPLEY had not himself acquainted them 
with any thing of the sort. 



24 

The Coroner said that he had taken the deposition of Ripley 
to that effect, which he had read over to them. 

The Jury replied that the deposition was not taken in their 
presence ; that what had been read to them had been written 
before the business of the Inquest commenced, on the first day 
(Saturday), that it was taken; when they were not present; and 
consequently when they had no opportunity of examining or put- 
ting questions to Ripley. 

Mr. Robinson resumed, 

" I had reason to believe, in the course of the Monday, 
from common report, from no particular information, that there 
would be disturbances in the town. I removed my wife that 
morning, I had previously settled with her that she should be 
removed ; on stating to RIPLEY that I should not come home 
that night, I said don't alarm yourself or your fellow servants. 
Take no particular precautions, I do not suppose they will do 
me any mischief, only keep at home, and don't be out of the 
way; don't shut up the windows earlier than usual, but be in 
the way, and look to the door. I only expected my windows to 
be broken, and had made up my mind to the consequent trifling 
expense. 

" Whilst I was at the House of Commons, that evening, I 
was informed by a Member, that he had met a mob, who 
said they were " going to break Mr. Robinson's windows." 
Not long after I had more particular information. I learned 
afterward that the mob not only broke the windows of the house, 
but the railings, which they used against it; that with the stones 
of the railings and the steps, they had attacked and entered the 
house, and broken two chairs and a table in the hall, the pieces 
of which they also used to finish the breaking of the windows. 
I learned too that the troops had come up, and the people dis- 
persed. 

" Finding that the attack on my house was of a very different 
kind from what I expected, that the mob desired to avenge them- 
selves on me personally, I thought it my duty, whilst in the 
House of Commons, to write to the Secretary of State, which I 
did, stating the particulars, and that for ought I knew, my pro- 
perty, and the property and lives of my servants were in dan- 
ger, and I requested that a military force might be sent to my 
house for the protection of my property and the lives of my ser- 
vants. I did this under the persuasion that without such pro- 
tection there was no security. I received no answer from Lord 
Sidmouth, but I understood, that on information being receivr 
ed from Burlington-street, that Lord Sidmouth had sent troops 
previous to the receipt of my letter. 

" The next morning, at tea, my Butler came to me, and 
stated the dilapidation and the threats against me personally, 



and against the lives of the servants also. He also informed 
me, that between nine and ten that morning, the mob had again 
attacked the house ; that they had used extreme violence, and 
had attempted to force open the house; that the soldiers, who 
had been sent the night before, had withdrawn at day light; and 
that no one was at the house to protect it, from that time until 
the time he came to me. Very soon after, the footman came, 
and informed me, that after Ripley had left the house, the mob 
had succeeded in breaking into it ; that an actual entrance had 
been effected soon after Ripley left. In consequence of this in- 
formation, and the apprehension of the servants, I felt it my 
duty to write again to the Secretary of State for some soldiers, 
and desired him to take care, that whatever force was sent there, 
should be kept there permanently. It being my decided opi- 
nion, that if they were not there permanently, neither the pro- 
perty nor the lives of the servants would be safe. 

Jury. " Why did you not call in the civil power?" 

Mr. Robinson. " My expectations were, that it was abso- 
lutely necessary to have both civil and military protection, and 
I did think, that no protection other than that would have been 
sufficient for the protection of my property and the lives of my 
servants. I certainly did think it my duty to afford them my 
protection. 

" In the course of the morning I told the footman to take 
care that the soldiers were placed in the house. I believe I 
told them both, both Ripley and Sutton ; and my reasons for 
desiring that the soldiers should be placed in the house, were 
these in the first place, as they were sent for my protection, I 
thought they were entitled to the shelter of my roof; and in the 
second place, as the iron railing, in front of the house, had been 
totally destroyed, and as the door, which had been forced open, 
had been barricadoed subsequently, as well as the means would 
allow, it appeared to be perfectly clear, that if any attack were 
made on the house, as I apprehended, and the soldiers had 
been placed outside of the house, and they had been attack- 
ed by superior numbers, they could not have afforded protection 
to the house, and would have had no retreat from superior 
numbers, who might press upon them. 

Jury. * Then of course we are to understand that you gave 
orders to call in the soldiers?" 

Mr. Robinson. " Most undoubtedly I did. I believe I 
told both Ripley and the footman, that in my opinion they 
ought to be inside in the house." 

The Coroner having proceeded in committing to paper por- 
tions of Mr. Robinson's statement, a Juryman suggested, that it 
would not be proper to take any part as evidence that was 
merely hearsay, and that he conceived they could only receive 

c 2 



as evidence, what Mr. Robinson himself actually knew. The 
Jury concurred in this opinion, and wished that part of Mr. 
Robinson's communication to be expunged, which could not be 
admitted as evidence in a court of law; 

Mr. ROBINSON resumed, 

" I wish it to be distinctly understood why I came here. 
I certainly feel that I am placed in a situation of peculiar de- 
licacy finding, that on the former Inquest (Vyse's) no state- 
ment was permitted from the servants, as to the attack of the 
preceding night (Monday), and that the evidence of a woman was 
received as to some supposed expressions of my servants on 
Monday night, or Tuesday morning, I thought it was essential 
to fair dealing, that it should be stated what had taken place 
the night before the accident ; that the transactions of Monday 
night should be stated, as the soldiers were sent in consequence 
of what took place then, and on Tuesday morning, in conse- 
quence of my requesting that a permanent protection might be 
sent there," 

A Juryman stated, that at half-past ten or eleven on Tues- 
day morning, he had seen the Horse Guards in the streets. 

Mr. Robinson. There were horse-soldiers in the street, but 
that was not the kind of guard I wished to have ; the Cavalry 
were for the protection of the street, I wished to have Infantry 
for the protection of the house and I thought it extremely 
strange that the Infantry were withdrawn. 

Jury. " Do you occupy the whole of the house ?" 

Mr. Robinson, " I occupy the whole of the house it does 
not belong to me." 

The Jury thought that as Mr. Robinson's statement related to 
the Monday and the Tuesday morning, it could not be evidence ; 
that their concern was with the business of Tuesday evening. 

Coroner. " This is a court to take evidence on both sides." 

The Jury acquiesced, but contended, that they had only to 
inquire touching the death of the deceased, which had taken 
place after the Horse- Guards left the street on Tuesday night 
at past Nine o'clock. 

Coroner. " I confess that I do not agree in opinion with 
.either the present or the former Jury I think the Tuesday was 
a continuation of the Riot on the former evening [Monday], 
and that it was all one act." 

A Juryman stated, that the Cavalry had been in the street 
nearly the whole of Tuesday that he had been at each end of 
the street, and they would not permit any person to enter the 
street without his being attended by a soldier to the particular 
house he wished to go to in the street. 

The Jury told Mr. Robinson that they thought his statement 



27 

as to the Monday night and Tuesday morning could not be re- 
ceived as evidence, but they wished to give him every oppor- 
tunity of explanation, and particularly as to the conversation 
he had with his servants in the course of Tuesday. 

Mr. Robinson said, that he would, if he could recollect all 
that took place, but he really could not recollect what took place, 
he no doubt inquired what had occurred he no doubt expressed 
himself very warmly he certainly wished to learn all that he 
could understand of the affair at his house. Mr. Robinson 
could not give tbe Jury any further particulars of the conversa- 
tion. He had nothing' to conceal, but could not remember any 
thing else. 

Jury. " Did you give orders for the Military to come in?" 
Mr. Robinson." Certainly I did." 

Jury. " Did you give your servants orders to procure fire- 
arms, or to load them?" 

Mr. Robinson. " Certainly I did not. I had a double 
barrell-gun fee. in pieces, and locked up; and if 1 had been in 
the house, I should most certainly have armed myself." 

Jury. Do you conceive that your servants were at liberty to 
arm themselves the people for instance that merely opened 
and shut your door? 

Air. Robinson. " In my opinion the servants did right to 
arm themselves, the propriety or impropriety depends on cir- 
cumstances." 

Jury. " In your opinion as a Senator, as a Member of 
Parliament, do you think that your servants were justified in 
going to Lord Buckinghamshire's, and getting shot and fire-arms 
to fire on twenty or thirty people before your door?" 

Mr. Robinson proceeded to answer this question, but seeing 
the Reporter of this account of the proceedings before the Inquest, 
who sat at his elbow, taking down the answer, he begged, that 
as it formed no part of the evidence, his mere opinion might 
not be committed to writing. The Reporter acquiesced in Mr. 
Robinson's wish, and that gentleman concluded by expressing 
his opinion. 

In answer to questions by the Jury, Mr Robinson said as 
follows. I never gave my servants orders to procure shot. I 
certainly did desire that there should be soldiers in the house 
with fire-arms, I did expect that the house would be attacked 
with a view to gain an entry, and in my opinion an attack on 
the door is an attempt to commit felony. It is impossible to 
detail a particular conversation with the servants. 

Jury. " Did the Footman tell you that he had got fire-arms 
from Lord Buckinghamshire's." 

Mr. Robinson. " I cannot recollect." 

Jury. " Or any shot ? 

Mr. Robinson." I cannot say." " I have no doubt that 



28 

I said the house ought to have been defended. I did order the 
soldiers to have refreshment." 

Jury. As you have been at the house since Tuesday, you can 
probably say what is the state of ihe window-shutters they 
were broken open it appears what is their present condition? 

Mr. Robinson. " They are cracked." 

Mr. Robinson replied as follows to other questions put by the 
Jury. 

The window-shutters are cracked Some of the pannels are 
cracked They were forced open. There are no holes in the 
shutters through which anything could be thrown. The fasten- 
ings to the shutters are a sort of common fastening. Cannot 
tell precisely what kind of fastenings. Cannot say any thing 
about ihe fastenings in particular. 

The Jury asked Mr. Robinson, if he himself really supposed 
there could have been what could be called Riot, when Ripley 
himself had gone into the crowd, and taken a man out of it, 
from among the rest of the people, and carried him away? 

Mr. Robinson. " Ripley told me that he had taken a man 
into custody, and that he had been obliged to let him go." 

The Jury said, that Ripley had taken the man into Clifford 
street, where he let him go, upon condition that he acknow- 
ledged he threw a stone, and would not do so any more. 

The Jury pressed upon Mr. Robinson the unreasonableness of 
supposing such a kind of assemblage at that time as could have 
been considered riotous, or generally ill disposed. 

Jury. Did Ripley tell you he had addressed the mob? 

Mr. R. He did say that he did put his head out of window 
and address the mob. 

The Jury said they were obliged to Mr. Robinson for what 
he had said. 

Mr. Coroner presumed Mr. Robinson's deposition might be 
taken. 

The Jury said that the greatest part of what Mr. Robinson 
had related, was not evidence. 

Mr. R. "If you heard one person as to what passed before 
Tuesday, I think you ought to take ray evidence. I understand 
questions were put to my servants relative to circumstances be- 
fore Tuesday, and I did think that I ought to give what evi- 
dence I could relative to the former transactions." 

A conversation ensued between Mr. Robinson and the Jury, 
in the course of which Mr. Robinson repeated, that in the second 
letter he had addressed to Lord Sidmoulh, that of Tuesday, he 
had requested that whatever protection was sent to his house 
should be there permanently. 

" For the soldiers being in my house on Tuesday night, the 
whole responsibility rests on myself and Lord Sidmoulh." 

A juryman, said that Mr. Robinson might, if he had thought 



29 

proper, have filled his house with military ; the business of 
the Jury was to inquire how the military in his house had con- 
ducted themselves ; and to determine from the evidence, whe- 
ther whilst they were there, they had not committed murder. 

The Coroner said, that the affairs of Monday and Tuesday, 
were one continued act of riot, in his opinion. 

The Foreman said that the Jury were not to be dictated to. 
They should, according to the best of their ability, upon their 
oath, determine how the deceased had come by her death, and 
declare it by their verdict. 

Mr. Robinson adverted to the evidence of his servants, and 
in particular to that of Ripley ; when [the Jurymen observed 
to Mr. Robinson, that his servants came prepared to give them 
every information, but what they wanted, and had so evaded, 
equivocated, and prevaricated, that if such evidence had been 
given at the bar of the House of Commons, they would have 
been committed. 

Mr. Robinson withdrew. As soon as Mr. Robinson had 
left the room, the Jury said, that as his coming there was for 
the purpose of explaining and relating the conversation he had 
with his servants, and as when they wished for the particulars 
of the conversation, he related nothing, they concurred in opi- 
nion, that his appearance there was attended with no advantage 
to their inquiry. 

WILLIAM GRAVES, 

Private in the 3d regiment of Foot Guards, sworn. 

The Witness was stationed, on Tuesday evening, the 7th of 
March, at the bottom of Mr. Robinson's house. It was about 
six when witness first went in. He had twenty-one rounds of 
ball cartridge with him. He was not ordered to fire, and did 
not fire. His comrade was George Ulph. No servants were 
there. He had one horn of beer. Was at supper when the row 
began, and the soldiers were called up to go to the kitchen door. 
Whilst there, a great many stones were thrown. Heard no re- 
port of a gun coming down the area. Cannot tell what time 
he went to the area door. Was stationed there about an hour, 
when Herbert called us up. He is a soldier. Herbert 
was stationed up stairs. He was the man that called us 
up. He said himself that he called us up. I asked the cor- 
poral if he called us, he said no. Did not see any of Mr. 
Robinson's servants, until after the Horse Guards came up. 
Saw them in the parlour after the firing. Heard " murder" 
cried whilst down stairs. Heard the people say, " If we did 
not open the door, they would break it open and murder us." 
Thought they would have murdered us. Cannot say how many 



30 

were outside. Had two horns of beer after the firing, during 
the night. Heard no disposition to riot whilst eating and drink- 
ing. 

Jury. At what hour was it the people said they would 
break in, and murder you? 

Withess. I think it was about half-past seven. 

It was about a quarter of an hour before the firing. Has no 
idea as to what time it was. Cannot say what time it was. 
Cannot tell how long it was. (Reminded of his knowledge of 
time as a soldier). 

The witness being very much agitated, was desired to collect 
himself, and keep cool. 

Thinks it might be an hour, or not more than an hour and a 
quarter after he was stationed, that he heard the people say they 
would break in, and murder the people inside. 

Had twenty-one rounds of ball cartridge, returned twenty 
rounds. He drew his charge at the armoury. The armourer 
saw him draw it. It was blank. He has the ball at home now. 
It was not the business of the corporal on duty with them that 
day to see to the ammunition of the soldiers. He did not be- 
long to the same company. Cannot tell whether any person 
fired into the area. Does not know whether any pistol was fired 
down into the area from the parlour window, or not. Thinks 
if a pistol had been fired down from the parlour window above in- 
to the area, he should have heard it. He did not hear any, and 
therefore does not believe that any was fired down. If two 
persons at the parlour window fired together, and one fired di- 
rectly straight forward, and the other down the area, he thinks 
he should have heard the difference. Did not hear any person 
in the area. Stones were thrown down the area. Did not see any 
soldier in a foraging cap. Is certain of it. Cannot say but that 
one of the men up stairs might have had a foraging cap on. 
Cannot tell which were the two men stationed in the dining 
room up stairs. Herbert, Mathews, Pawley, and Clements 
were stationed up stairs, but cannot positively say at what parts. 

JOSEPH PAWLEY, 

Private in the 6lh company, \sl battalion 3d regt. of Foot 
Guards, sworn. 

The witness does not know the name of the Captain of the 
company. Knows him very well, but does not know his name. 
The officers are changed very often. Entered Mr. Robinson's 
house on Tuesday, the 7th of March, about six or seven o'clock, 
about three quarters of an hour before he was stationed. When 
he went in first he sat down. Had a horn of beer. Had a 
mouthful of victuals. Was stationed at the door with Clements. 



31 

Was there a very few minutes, when a great number of stonei 
were thrown against the street door. Thinks it was about seven 
o'clock. .It continued some time. About half an hour or bet- 
ter, at intervals. Heard a voice cry out " open the door. If 
you don't open it, we'll break through, and destroy the house and 
you to." They were knocking at the door, at the rapper, some 
with stones. Seemed to be a great many. Thought his life 
was in danger. This was about a quarter of an hour. It was 
not at the time of the firing. Never fired off his piece. Wit- 
ness loaded. Had twenty-one rounds of ball cartridge. Loaded 
with powder only. Saw Mr. Robinson's servants occasionally 
in the passage. Returned twenty full rounds, and a ball. 
Did not hear them in the parlour. Cannot tell where the but- 
ler was. Cannot tell whether the corporal ordered witness to 
load. Witness is sure he bit off the ball. Corporal ordered 
witness to load with blank cartridge. Witness's comrade fired 
blank through the fan-light. The corporal did not see him 
draw his charge. The corporal was gone to the magistrate. 
The other soldiers were present, and saw him draw his charge. 
Cannot tell when the firing was in the parlour. Witness's 
comrade had not fired through the fan-light when he heard the 
cry of " Murder." It was not till after the cry that he fired. 
Thinks the firing was about nine. Cannot read or write. Un- 
loaded his musket by reversing it. Powder fell out. It was 
in the street he unloaded it. Did not stoop down to pick it up. 
Returned twenty-one' rounds to the armoury. Fifteen to the 
corporal of the pioneers, and six to the armourer. Gave in the 
one ball as a charge. Always gives ammunition to the pibueeer 
corporal when he has an extra quantity. Had fifteen rounds 
from the Sergeant, and six from the non-commissioned officer 
he fell in with in the morning ; gave fourteen complete rounds 
and a ball without cartridge to the Pioneer Corporal ; when 
ordered into the street, stood abreast; the Corporal was away 
about half an hour with the Magistrate the Magistrate took 
him away The Magistrate with his officers took him away I 
should have fired if they had oppressed us, and broken in I did 
not fire because I was not oppressed The Corporal ordered us 
to prime and load, but did not order us to fire Witness said 
nothing to his comrade when he fired through the fan-light, nor 
did his comrade say any thing to him Witness had his bayonet 
in the scabbard when his comrade fired does not know 
whether his comrade at the time he fired had his bayonet on or 
not. 



WILLIAM CLEMENTS, 

Private in the 3d Res,, of Foot-Guards, sworn. 
if 

The witness went into Mr. Robinson's house about 6 o'clock: 
all went into the back kitchen. The servant took us down to 
shew us where to put our things : the first thing we had was 
one horn of beer a piece. Sat there about two hours. The 
man-servant took us all up stairs, and shewed us where we 
were to be stationed. He took the whole up, and shewed us to 
our different stations. Witness was stationed in the passage at 
the street-door, with Joseph Pawley: was stationed by the 
corporal and the servant. Ulph and Graves were stationed 
below : Herbert and Mathews were stationed in the parlour. 
We were only taken there te be shewn our places, and then we 
went down stairs again. We sat for some little time, perhaps 
near half an hour, and then we had something to eat some 
bread and beef, and mutton. We had nothing to drink then. 
Before we had done eating, we were called up. All went to 
their stations. A crowd was round the door. Gould hear 
they were there, by the brickbats and stones thrown at the 
windows and the door. Could tell there were brickbats thrown, 
by what came in through the fan-light. This continued for per- 
haps an hour not constantly. It was about 8, or a quarter 
past 8, when witness was called to his station. The shutters 
were broken in : I could hear them whilst I was in the 
passage. 

[Mr. GELL, the Coroner, came in, and remained about an 
hour, and then went away.] 

Witness heard a gun go off from the parlour after the throw- 
ing had been about half an hour, or more. Cannot say whether 
it was a musket or a pistol. Was certain it went off from the 
parlour. Witness then wenHnto the parlour to see what had 
happened: remained there two or three minutes. Cannot tell 
what conversation passed. The corporal, and Mathews and 
Herbert were there. The servant was in the parlour who had 
stationed them there. 

[Mr. Robinson's butler, footman, and groom, were then 
ordered into the Inquest-room, and the witness identified 
JAMES RIPLEY, the butler, as having stationed the sol- 
diers.] 

Witness does not know who fired. Saw no pistol. The 
corporal and the two soldiers had their muskets in their hands. 
In a few minutes after the witness had returned to his station, 
the mob came up, and threw stones and brickbats, as before, 
into the passage. It continued about 10 or 15 minutes. I got 
no blow from any thing, but something dropped on my arm. 



33 

Heard a voice say, from outside the door, " Let us begin and 
pull the house down." Some one made answer, and said, 
" So we will." The people who spoke were close to the door. 
Stones might have fallen upon those who said so. Witness then 
heard something like pulling up of stones or bricks outside the 
door. Witness then levelled his piece through the fan-light, 
and fired it. It was only loaded with powder. I cannot say 
whether I fired first : there were three or four went off nearly 
at once from the parlour. Was induced to level his piece, 
from believing they were going to pull the house down. Can- 
not tell how many stones were in the passage : did not count 
them. Cannot tell how many brickbats were there. Did not 
see a bit of brick so big as a half brick. Cannot tell how much 
the stones and things thrown would make whether a wheel- 
barrow full, or a bushel-basket full, or how many cannot tell 
at all. 

The armourer, Thomas Jones, gave witness six rounds of 
ball-cartridge; first Herbert gave him six, Sergeant Massey 
gave him six; witness left his ammunition in the armourer's 
room in the pouch, no particular men were present ; the armourer 
ought to have been there to receive the ammunition, but was 
not ; left nineteen cartridge and two balls in his pouch did not 
unload his piece at the street door recollects some man trying 
to unload his gun, he reversed it on the ground as if to throw 
out the powder ; did not see the man stoop to pick any thing up 
should not have fired ball unless the door had been broken open, 
and he had been obligated to fire. People were at the door when 
witness fired. The corporal ordered us whatever we did not to fire 
off with ball, he desired us to bite off the balls ; witness cannot 
tell whether he fired off first or not ; the pieces fired so near to- 
gether, he cannot tell which fired first ; there were three or 
four fired including his own witness p<imed and loaded again, 
loaded again with pnwHer; did not fire with ball, because he 
had not orders knew himself better than to fire ball without 
orders. It is very easy for a man to put in a ball, if he is 
obligated to fire with ball. Is certain Pawley did not fire ; the 
Horse-Guards came up and cleared the streets. In a minute after 
the firing, heard " Murder" called. When witness fired he 
was close to the door, and levelled upwards through the fan- 
light. There was no firing but by the witness, and from the 
parlour. 

THOMAS WHITE, 
Of 39, Broad-street, Carnaby market, Cabinet-maker, sworn, 

On Tuesday evening, the 7th of March, witness went into 
Old Burlington-street about ten o'clock, a few minutes before 



34 

or after. Walked through the street, from curiosity, to see 
what havoc the public had made at Mr. Robinson's house. 
Went to the front of the house. A dozen or fourteen persons 
were directly opposite to Mr. Robinson's house, on the same 
side of the way. They were not on the pavement, but as near 
to the kirb-stone as possible. They were apparently men and 
lads. Some were lads. Witness believes there were persons 
passing and repassing on the opposite side of the way. Those 
on the opposite side the way appeared to be merely passing 
and repassing, but could not exactly say, it beiag rather dark. 
Some of these twelve or fourteen persons were talking to a 
soldier and a person in coloured clothes at the window next 
door. They were tantalizing the soldiers in consequence of 
a gun having been previously fired. They said to them, u you 
had better load, or charge, with e'ghly shillings" The soldier 
spoke in a very brutish savage kind of way, " you had better 
mind what you are about," or " how you conduct yourself, 
or you will find to the contrary." He said this, or words to 
that effect. Witness then immediately went, in an oblique 
direction, towards Burlington Gardens ; and before he had 
got three parts of the way across the road obliquely, witness 
heard a small stone, or bit of brick, or something of that kind, 
thrown against the house ; it sounded as if against the sashes 
or shutters, and witness instantly heard the report of three guns 
or pieces ; two nearly together, and one almost momentarily 
afterwards. Instantly, as I. stepped on the kirb the deceased 
dropt directly before me, at the distance of about thirty yards, 
in an oblique direction from Mr. Robinson's house. The 
soldier that spoke seemed intoxicated he seemed so by his 
speech. He had his gun levelled on the window sill. There 
was a person in plain clothes at his right, shorter in size than 
the soldier. The gun was not presented as if it was aimed at 
any person in particular, \\\\t the bayonet wac fivp.H, and I did 
not see it at first, but the moment I did I went away instantly, 
for the soldier spoke in. a savage brutal manner, and I really 
was afraid of some mischief happening. I saw no disposition 
to riot. There was no body of people to make it. The right 
hand parlour window shutter was open. There was another 
soldier in the room, and a light in the back parlour, and some 
persons there. Witness heard at the moment that there was 
a man shot at the other end of the street. 

The JURY ADJOURNED at a little before six o'clock until half 
past seven precisely, when they again assembled. 



35 

ROBERT PACK, 

Under butler to Lord Buckinghamshire, in Hamilton-place, 
Piccadilly, parish of St. George, sworn. 

Knows nothing of the death of the deceased. Knows James 
Ripley and William Sutton, servants to Mr. Robinson. Saw 
William Sutton, footman to Mr. Robinson, at Lord Bucking- 
hamshire's house on Tuesday morning, before twelve o'clock. 
Had no particular conversation with him, except about some 
shot Sutton asked witness to give him. Witness had a 
bag of shot, of the size uf peas, in his hand when Sutton 
came to the house. Witness was then loading a brace of 
pistols belonging to Lord Buckinghamshire. Su ton never said 
a word to witness about any thing that happened at Mr. Ro- 
binson's the night before. Sutton asked witness to give him 
some of the shot. Witness never loaded those pistols before. 
He always had a brace of pistols of his own loaded. Witness 
does not know how it was, but so it was that he loaded the 
butler's pistols that day. Does not know whether Sutton 
saw him loading the pistols. When Sutton came, witness had 
loaded the brace of pistols. The pistols were not in the room 
when Sutton came to witness for the shot. Witness was in the 
pantry when Sutton asked for the shot. It is usual for witness 
to put the shot away with the pistols, on loading the pistols, 
immediately. Witness, to the best of his knowledge, was put- 
ting away the shot when Sutton came in. Does not recollect any 
thing that passed, but Sutton asking witness to give him some of 
the shot. Cannot at all say what quantity. To the best of 
witness's knowledge, not more than two dozen. Put them in 
a bit of paper. Sutton never said any thing of the purpose for 
which he wanted them. He said " will you give me some of 
those shot ?" and I gave them to him. I really did not ask him 
what he was going to do with it. Saw Sutton this morning. 
Sutton borrowed no pistol of me, nor did James Ripley. The 
witness was most particularly pressed respecting the conver- 
sation between him and Sutton, and particularly as to whether 
Sutton had not said any thing whatever respecting what had 
taken place at Mr. Robinson's the night before, but the witness 
positively denied that Sutton had said any thing about the affair 
at Mr. Robinson's. 

WILLIAM SUTTON, 

Footman to Mr. Robinson, re-examined. 

. Witness borrowed the pistol from Lord Buckinghamshire's 
butler. Witness took a note to Lady Buckinghamshire, and 



36 

JRipley \gzvt witness a note to MITCHEL, the butler, in con- 
sequence of which he gave witness the pistol. The note was 
to borrow the pistol. Witness asked the under butler for the 
shot. He had not the shot. The under butler went for it. 
He went for it into another room. Witness knew the under 
butler had shot, because he saw him with some when witness 
was there before in the course of the day. Witness had been 
backwards and forwards all day with notes. Cannot say what 
time he went there first, nor where he saw the shot. It was 
somewhere at the lower part of the house. Saw the under 
butler with the shot. It was in a bag. Witness knew it was" 
shot. Saw the under butler teeming the shot up and down in 
his hand. Cannot tell how many shot he had. Cannot tell at 
all Not how many dozen. Not whether it was a tea-cup 
full. Cannot tell any thing of the quantity. Cannot tell what 
pocket he put them into, whether the waistcoat pocket, or the 
coat pocket, or the breeches pocket. 

The shutters were nailed up, a carpenter nailed them up. 
They were fastened up and nailed up. Cannot tell whether 
they were barred. They were barred up. Therrott was the 
carpenter who nailed them up. Cannot tell who used to bar 
the shutters up at night. Will not swear what kind of bars 
they are. 

The Jury proposed that the soldiers should be called up, for 
the witness to point out the man to whom he gave the shot, 
and whom he saw load his piece with it, and fire out of the win- 
dow. The Witness inquired whether all the soldiers had been 
examined. The Jury desired to know of the witness, his 
reason for the inquiry. He said, that he did not know whether 
he should be doing right in pointing out the man, and requested 
to be informed, by the Coroner, if it was proper. The Co- 
roner said, certainly, if he knew the man; and all the soldiers 
having entered the room, the witness pointed out RICHARD 
MATHEWS. 

I saw him, Mathews, go to the window, and discharge his 
piece, after he had loaded it with the shot I gave him. Can- 
not say whether any other man had shot in his gun, but 
Mathews. Cannot say how many shot he gave him. Mathews 
fired both the pistol and his own piece, he fired them nearly 
together. Does not think Mathews was at all intoxicated. 
Certainly not from what witness had given him, or seen 
given him. Believes Ripley was in the room when the shot 
was fired : when Mathews took the pistol out of Ripley's hand, 
he fired it so immediately that witness thinks it impossible that 
Ripley could have left the room. Heard the reports of guns 
at the same time that Mathews fired the pistol and gun. 
Mathews fired the pistol and gun. Never saw Ripley fire but 



once, 'when he fired it down the area. It was loaded with 
shot. It was fired twenty minutes before the last firing. The 
pistol was loaded when Mathews took it out of Ripley's hand. 
The different pieces went off as near as possible together. There 
were three or four, they went off " clap, clap," as quick as pos- 
sible. Cannot say whether three or four went off. Mathews 
fired both off almost together. He fired so quick together that 
witness really cannot say which he fired first. 

ROBERT PACK'S 

Examination resumed. 

. ; .'jt 

Never saw Sutton more than once on Tuesday morning. Not 
more than once that day. He might have been at the house, 
and witness not have seen him. 

The butler came to witness after he was a-bed on Monday 
night, about twenty minutes or half-past ten. He said he 
wanted the pistol I had in the cupboard, and I got up and gave 
it him. It is a pistol used by a footman when he rides post, 
a holster pistol. The butler did not tell him what it was for. 
Nothing passed at all. Really does not recollect a word pass- 
ing between Sutton and witness when the shot was given. Saw 
Sutton to-day, but no conversation took place respecting the 
business of his coming here. It was one of the pistols that 
witness constantly had in the pantry with him. Should 
know it. 

THOMAS JONES, 

No. 10, Castle Yard, Westminster, in the Parish of St. 
Margaret's, Sworn. 

Witness has the charge of the arms and accoutrements be- 
longing to Col. Stewart's company. Cannot state the number 
of ball-cartridges he delivered out. It was the duty of the 
corporal to take account of the ammunition. Remembers de- 
livering ammunition to the six soldiers, but cannot tell how 
much. It is impossible for him to recollect. He kept no 
account. The men were not on regular duty. Upon regular 
duty always kept an account of the ammunition. George 
Ulph's piece, No. 626, was never fired off. There was one 
other piece that had not been fired, but cannot tell which. 
Herbert said, " I fired some blank cartridge," he said to the 
witness, " it must be washed." Cannot tell whose pieces 
had been fired out of; there had been four pieces fired out of. 
The corporal did not belong to my company, I had nothing 
to do with his piece. Is sure there were four out of the six 



38 

pieces fired out of. Had no corporal in the way but himself, 
and cannot say what ammunition he delivered out. Took no 
account of it. Upon my oath, two of the pieces had not been 
fired, and four of the pieces had been fired. If a man had 
drawn his charge, it would have been different from a piece 
that had been fired. When upon regular duty a regular ac- 
count is kept. If any is missing, then, it must be paid for. 
It must be paid for by the man who is deficient. This was not 
regular duty. There were a great many men out that night, 
and witness had to give ammunition to all. To some he gave 
sixteen, some twenty, some twenty-four rounds, just as they 
wanted it. It is quite impossible for him to say what he re- 
ceived back from any man. 

RICHARD BURTON, Corporal, 
Re-examined. 

Did not see Mathews load with shot, or ask Sutton for it, or 
take it, or see him with a pistol, or any body else with a 
pistol, or a pistol at all. Cannot say which of Mr. Robinson's 
servants was in the room at the last firing. 

RICHARD WHITE, 

39, Broad-Street, Garnaby Market, Sworn. 

Went out with his brother to Old Burlington Street, at very 
near ten o'clock, to see the outrages that had been committed 
at Mr. Robinson's. There were very few people in 
the street. There were fourteen or fifteen persons on the 
pavement very near to the windows, they were on the pave- 
ment. There was a soldier had a musket over the sill of the 
window. The people said to him, " You will only fire eighty 
shillings," or " Bullock's Blood," or something to that effect. 
The soldier said if they did not mind, they would find to the 
contrary, or to that effect. The words were hardly out of his 
mouth, when witness heard a stone thrown against the house. 
They fired instantly I went towards Burlington Street. I heard 
a terrible cry of " Murder," and was afraid my brother was 
killed. He saw his brother holding the woman's head between 
his knees her friend was with her. Heard the Horse-Guards 
coming in, and endeavoured to persuade his brother to go 
away, as the Horse-Guards were then coming into the street. 
There were a few persons at the end of the street as witness en- 
tered it. The people did not appear disposed to be riotous. 
When the woman dropped, three pieces went off. The 
window shutters were not open at the window farthest from 
the door, and, therefore, thinks it likely the guns were fired 



59 

from the window next door. Upon his oath, the window 
shutters of the window farthest from the door were shut. Can- 
not positively say that they were. The instant he heard the 
first gun go off, he turned his back away, and went off. When 
witness first went off, a soldier was at the window nearest the 
door, with his musket levelled over the sill of the window, 
and, I believe, there were two persons in coloured clothes 
standing by him. Was exactly at the end of Mr. Robinson's 
house when the first gun went off. Witness then made off as 
quick as possible, and found his brother as before mentioned. 
Witness and his brother then went away, and left the woman, 
as he supposed, dead. The Horse-Guards were arriving a 
the time. 



THOMAS MITCHELL, 
JSutler to the Earl of Buckinghamshire, sworn. 

On Monday evening after the attack on Mr. Robinson's house, 
witness received a note from Ripley, Mr. Robinson's butler, 
brought by William Sutton, the footman, the purport of which 
was, that if I had any fire arms, he requested I would send 
them by the footman, as they had that night experienced a very 
desperate attack at the door, and the windows were broken in, 
and they had no arms of any kind to defend themselves, for 
they expected another assault. On this witness went to Robert 
Pack, the under butler, who has pistols for the protection of 
Lord Buckinghamshire's plate and other property, and asked him 
to give witness a pistol. I told him what had happened at Mr. 
Robinson's. He got out and went to a closet, and took from it 
a pistol, which he delivered to the witness, who gave it to Wil- 
liam Sutton. (Witness looked at the pistol, believed it to be 
the pistol, but could not positively swear to it.) It had been in 
the under butler's possession many years. Does not recollect 
what ammunition the under butler gave him. Saw Sutton once 
on the Tuesday, but he might have been there several times 
without witness seeing him. 

The CONSTABLE was sent to Mr. Robinson's house for the 
pistol, which he brought with him. It was loaded with pow- 
der, and eight shot, of the same description as those produced 
from the brain of EDWARD VYSE, upon the former inquest. 
The constable had unloaded the pistol, and produced it, with 
the powder and the shot loose. 



40 



ROBERT PACK, re-examined. 

Does not recollect the last witness having told him any thing 
respecting what had happened at Mr. Robinson's house, at the 
time witness gave him the pistol. The witness was shewn the 
pistol. 

Witness. That is the pistol. It was loaded with powder 
and shot. 

The Jury seeming disposed to close their inquiry, the CORO- 
NER proposed to close with the examination of the next witness. 

WILLIAM HONE, 

55, Fleet-street, Bookseller, sworn. 

The Coroner produced the deposition of the witness before the 
inquest on EDWARD VYSE, and asked him if he meant to vary it 
at all. The witness answered in the negative, and the Coroner 
read the deposition as evidence upon the present inquest.* The 
witness added, that it 'was not inserted in the deposition, although 
he had deposed, that had two horse soldiers, or the officers who 
took the man into custody, as related in witness's deposition, been 
in attendance, and done their duty in Burlington-street, they 
could have cleared it of the people at any time the witness was 
there. 

The Jury wished to see MR. BRODIE the Surgeon of St. 
George's Hospital, who was assisted in dissecting the brain of 
the deceased, by THOMAS THOMPSON, whose evidence had been 
received the first day. Mr. Brudie being sent for, the constable 
returned with Mr. fhompson, who said, that Mr. Brodie was 
not at the Hospital, and as it was then half-past eleven o'clock, 
the Jury declined fetching him from his house in Sackville street, 
but put some questions to Mr. Thompson, relative to the exami- 
nation of the brain of the deceased. Mr. Thompson, in explana- 
tion, said, that Mr. Brodie and himself had carefully examined 
the brain of the deceased, and found no ball or shot, and the 
witness had no douot whatever, of the wounds having been 
produced by a discharge from fire-arms; but witness, who 
is a young man, spoke with considerable diffidence as to the 
kind of shot or ball which had made the perforations: upon 
the whole, he believed that the wounds were inflicted by a ball, 
and this persuasion was grounded on the very unusual density 
and thickness of the deceased's skull, in that part, which lie 
thought could not have been penetrated by shot. 

* VYSE'S Report, p. 18. 



41 

At ten minutes before twelve o'clock at night, the Jury in- 
timating to the Coroner that they did not require further 
evidence, h proposed to read over the depositions ; but they 
stated, that they had given close attention to the evidence, and 
would not trouble him ; they merely required to be alone, for 
the pwpose of considering their Verdict. 

The Coroner expressed considerable regret, that his conduct 
on receiving the Verdict brought in by the former Inquest on 
EDWARD VYSE, had been misstated. It had been alleged, he 
said, that he had with that Verdict received certain RESOLU- 
TIONS of the Jury,* and he wished any gentlemen then present, 
and he knew there were some, whs had witnessed the close of 
that Inquest, would state what really did take place, and as far 
as depended on themselves, contradict the erroneous allegation. 
The Reporter of this account then said that he was present when 
the Inquest on EDWARD VYSE gave their Verdict, and that, on 
the Foreman having delivered the Verdict, he presented the 
Resolutions on which the Jury had grounded it, which the Co- 
roner declined receiving, saying all that he wanted was their Ver- 
dict, he had nothing to do with their opinions. -f 

The Coroner said, lie hoped that if the gentlemen of the pre- 
sent Jury thought proper to come to any resolutions, that they 
would see the propriety of not letting such resolutions meet his 
eye, all that he could receive from them would be their Verdict, 
whatever it might be ; as Coroner he could neither record or 
notice any thins: else. 

The Coroner and strangers then withdrew, and left the Jury 
to deliberate at ten minutes before twelve o'Clock. 

At half past twelve o Clock, the Jury announced to the Co- 
roner that they were ready ; and when he entered the room, 
the Foreman of the Inquest returned the following 

VERDICT, 

" Wilful Murder, against JAMES RlPLEY, 
RICHARD MATHEWS, ROBERT HERBERT, and 
RICHARD BURTON, by firing ball, or shot, from 
and out of Fire-arms, from the windows of MR. 
ROBINSON'S house in OLD BURLINGTON-STREET, 
PICCADILLY." 



* VYSE'S Report, p. 68. 

t For the particulars at length, autl tie Resolutions alluded to, sec 
also VYSE'S 



42 

When the Coroner had recorded the Verdict, he filled up a 
warrant to the constable, committing the corporal and the two 
soldiers to Tothill Fields priion, and authorizing the appre- 
hension of James Ripley, the Butler, and his committal to the 
same prison. Ripley had left the house when the Jury were 
about to retire. 

The following persons who had given evidence, were then 
called, 

1 'homos Thompson. William Clements. 

William Sutton. Thomas White. 

Amelia Davis. Robert Pack. 

Philip Chaffey. Thomas Jones. 

William Smith. Richard While. 

George Ulph. Thomas Mitchell. 

William Graves. William Hone. 
Joseph Pawley. 

They all answered to their names, and entered into recogni- 
zances of Forty pounds each, to appear and give evidence at 
the ensuing sessions ; and THE BEADLE of the Parish of St. 
George^ Hanover-square^ was bound over on behalf of the 
parish, then to prosecute RICHARD MATHEWS, Private in 
the 6lh Company, 1st Battalion 3d Regiment of Fool Guards; 
ROBERT HERBERT, Private in the same Company; RICH- 
ARD BURTON, Corporal in the same Regiment, and JAMES 
RIPLEY, Butler to the HON. JOHN FREDERICK RO- 
BINSON, of OLD BURLINGTON STREET, on the Inquest's Ver- 
dict of WILFUL MURDER. 



The business having concluded about One o'clock in the 
morning of Tuesday, the 21st of March, 1815, 

THE COURT was dissolved by Proclamation. 



THE END. 



43 

Just Published^ by William Hone, Bookseller, 55, Fleet- 
street, in Svo. price 2s. 6d. 

A CIRCUMSTANTIAL REPORT of the Extra- 
ordinary evidence and proceedings before the CORO- 
NER'S INQUEST, on the body of EDWARD VYSE, 
who, on Tuesday evening, March 7, 1815, was SHOT 
DEAD from the parlour windows of the House of the 
Hon. Frederick Robinson, M. P. in Old Burlington-street. 
Specially Reported, and Revised from minutes taken by 
the Inquest, with the SURGEON'S REPORT, and other 
Documents. 

BY WILLIAM HONE, 

ONE OF THE EVIDENCE. 




TO THE READER. 



HAVING been present in Old Burlington-Street on Tuesday 
Evening, the 7th of March, at the time of the firing from the 
windows of Mr. ROBINSON'S house, I was unexpectedly called 
upon to give evidence before the Coroner's Inquest, and I was 
the first witness examined upon the second day's sitting. 

Mr. CELL, Jun., who examined all the witnesses after the 
first day, after taking my deposition, in the presence of the 
Coroner, and after I had subscribed my name to it, presented 
me a blank sheet of paper, and requested that I would sign it 
in the part he pointed out, towards the bottom corner of the 
sheet. 

I hesitated, and expressed a wish to know for what purpose 
a blank paper was given me to sign. 



44 

Mr. CELL said, that it was a matter of form ; it was requi- 
site that there should be a Copy of my Deposition signed by 
myself; and still presenting me the blank sheet of paper, he 
said, " You will sign this, and we shall put a Copy of your 
Deposition upon it afterwards." 

I said, " Sir, I cannot sign a blank paper. I will wait, if 
you please, or I will wait upon you at any time, any where you 
will have the goodness to name." 

Mr. CELL. That will not do. It must be done here 
now. 

Myself. I am very sorry, but I cannot sign a blank paper. 
It is impossible, and (turning to the jury) to say the least of it, 
it is irregular. 

Mr. CELL. Very well you must wait then. 

After the lapse of about an hour, during a short pause in the 
examination of a witness, I stood forward, and said : 

*' Mr. Coroner, Sir. I beg pardon for the interruption, 
but I have particular business, and if you will permit me to 
withdraw, I will attend here again in an hour, or two hours, or 
any where else, if you will permit me." 

Mr. CELL. No. You must wait now. You must attend 
the Inqutst till the business is over. 

The inquest adjourning that evening, I was induced, on my 
attendance on the following day, to take minutes of the proceed- 
ings ; and in particular, to take down the "Testimony of the Wit- 
nesses , in the words wherein they delivered themselves. This 
I continued until the Verdict of the Coroner's Jury was re- 
corded, after midnight, on Saturday, or rather on Sunday 
morning, the 12th instant. 

In doing this, I exerted myself to report every syllable that 
was uttered in evidence, with scrupulous fidelity. 

The preparation of that part of the report which embraces 
the proceedings before I attended to be examined, and conse- 
quently when I was not present, has been most essentially 
assisted by the minutes of the Gentlemen of the Jury, which 
they permitted me to use as I thought proper; and those 
Gentlemen themselves have, upon my solicitation, personally 
aided me in endeavouring to present a faithful report of the 
proceedings of this important Inquest. 

WILLIAM HONE. 



J. M'Creery, Printer, Black-Horse Court 
London. 










CAL! F0% OF-CAL! FO/? 

f, 









1