Skip to main content

Full text of "Report of the United States Geological Survey of the territories"

See other formats


&'f> 


<:m:WiK;:'.y.i:it 


'^^^^«^^^^,^, 


-^^A^A-A,^ 


1,        '■■'■'  n,ri'\A^i 


:    •■    -     I    1   f    '    <    i|    1    1   ,1    y    .;  n    ■'     t   1,^.1   j_  ,1  ■.,-   .  ■- 


''^'^AAA. 


-M^^f 


IK 


'     '  '  '     I     ''     f) 


™,\%/^.n^fl. 


Wm:^^:. 


' :--mm^ym 


-    ."■■■■■■•"-. r^sA, 


WA^ 


■■''"mm 


,%^ft^flfl5 


JJ«TJ«UM.TT  ' 


bitt^ii^ii^w«iy.u-y 


-  1  if  ' 


MiMJj^JM 


fmmm 


tmm'^A.iJ':;i 


5>»«^: 


■UT  UWf.T  TT-T 


,^^,^n^«i^«,«a,?^ 


iu.ucmrm 


^^^AAA 


.*1^ 


iwiiiiwi. I.I  I  I  ■:  I  r    rhW.'^l 


W-LL(JT.fTJJ 


»««««, 


9aM^^^ 


^•'^'^OMr^Af^mr 


i::>*-*^. 


iM"*'' 


V'^/^/^AOAaA, 


'if 


TTUJifififif/iMiiubCIS 


mf^^U:f\^^^^' 


■'mV't'/^Km 


Llj^U  vis^^yiK^^^C^ -'^  V-^'W/ia^^/^A, 


^A^/^A^n/in^^^r 


%^^^M- 


i^^?^i^^L^'.a^.®^: 


'mm^ 


■Mfm^^&^m^ 


^^^^MJrSr^. 


Wmi^^^A 


,[^0^/^ 


.,„MPWP? 


'^'^^^f 


'J[JjA]tllJJJdMMinJaIuIi!MJmuJlMm6hHm 


-:j.H^'''^:<l^>';';''.^,^; 


*«A^<^*/» 


llHAWfikWJr 


Mi^^^^^hf\^i^ 


'''^^^/•^^^'v^'-'Aft^^ 


■  r/^^  /^ ' , 


'a^AA'^.A/i^ 


;AA^^^;^^?^' 


jf^y^'^/^^' 


Ai^A^AAAA 


/f?^ 


1^'^ 


DEPARTMENT     OF     THE     INTERIOR. 


R  K  P»  (  )  R  T 


CSITED  STATES  GEOLOGICAL  SURVEY 


THE     TERRITORIES. 


F.  V.  H-AYDEN, 

UNITED  STATES  GEOLOGIST-IN-CHAUGE. 


IN     FIVE    VOLUMES. 


WASHINGTON: 

GOVERNMENT    PRINTING    OFFICE. 
1873. 


LETTER    TO    THE    SECRETARY. 

Sir:  1  have  the  honor  to  jircsent  for  your  approval  and  for  publication  the 
tirst  part  of  volume  I  of  the  quarto  series  of  reports  which  are  intended  to 
embody  the  more  original  and  technical  results  of  the  survey  under  my  direc- 
tion. Tlie  present  memoir  on  the  "  Extinct  vertebrata  of  our  Western  Terri- 
tories" has  Ijeen  elaborated  by  Professor  Joseph  Leidy,  the  eminent  compar- 
ative anatomist,  and  will  form  one  of  the  most  important  contributions  to  the 
science  of  extinct  organisms  ever  made  in  this  country.  This  memoir  will 
be  followed  b}'  a  second  part  on  the  same  subject  by  Professor  E.  D.  Cope. 

Volume  II  will  embrace  the  subject  of  the  extinct  flora  of  our  western 
Territories ;  and  it  is  the  purpose  to  make  it  as  exhaustive  as  possible.  Pro- 
fessor J.  S.  Newl)erry  is  preparing  the  first  part  and  Professor  Leo  Lesque- 
reux  the  second.  The  well-known  reputation  of  these  gentlemen  is  a  suffi- 
cient guarantee  for  the  value  of  their  work. 

Volume  III  will  include  all  the  materials  collected  by  the  survey  ou  the 
subject  of  extinct  invertebrata,  and  will  be  most  carefully  elaborated  by  the 
eminent  j)aleontologist  of  the  survey,  Mr.  F.  B.  Meek. 

Volume  IV  will  embrace  the  profiles,  sections,  maps,  and  other  illustrations, 
with  descriptive  text  by  the  geologist  in  charge. 

Volume  V  will  contain  separate  memoirs  on  different  subjects  in  recent 
zoology  and  botany,  prepared  by  several  authors.  All  the  new  and  imper- 
fectly described  species  of  plants  or  animals  collected  by  the  survey  will  be 
studied  and  fully  illustrated.  All  these  volumes  are  now  in  an  advanced  state 
of  preparation.  In  presenting  to  the  world  these  important  contributions  to 
science,  permit  me,  sir,  to  extend  to  you  my  sincere  thanks  for  your  intelH- 
gent  sym]iathy  and  hearty  co-operation  in  the  work. 
Very  respectfully,  your  obedient  servant, 

F.  V.  HAYDEN, 
United  States  Geoloff,ht. 

Hon.  C.  Delano,  Scrrctarji  of  the  Ii/fcrior. 


^f 


"V^OLXJME    I. 


FOSSIL    VERTEBRATES 


P^RT    1 


CONTRIBUTIONS 


EXTINCT   VERTEBRATE   EAUNA 


THE  WESTERN  TERRITORIES. 


liV 


PROF.    JOSEPH    LEIDY. 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS. 


Pafie. 

PREFACE 14 

EXTINCT  VERTEBRATE  FAUNA  OF  THE  BRIDGER  TERTIARY  FORMATION  OF  WYOM- 
ING TERRITORY 15 

INTRODUCTION 15 

MAMMALIA 27 

Oider  PcrissodactyJa  27 

PalsBosyops - 27 

paludosua  28 

major 45 

Junius 57 

Lininoliy  us 57 

Hyrachy  us 51( 

agrarius (iO 

exiaiius OG 

modestus 07 

nanus fi7 

Lopliiotberium <i'J 

sylvaticum : G9 

Trogosus • 71 

castorifleus 71 

vetulus 75 

Hyopsodas 75 

paulus 75 

niinuscnlus 81 

Microsus HI 

cnspidatus 81 

Myciosy  ops 82 

gracilis   83 

Nothaictus 86 

tenebrosus 86 

Hipposy  us 90 

formosus 90 

robustior 93 

Order  Prohoscidea 93 

Uintatberium 93 

robustum 96 

Order  iJo(?(;H(ia 109 

Paraniys 109 

delicatus -. 110 

delieatior 110 

delicatissimus Ill 

Mysops I'l 

minimus Ill 

fraternus 11- 

Soiuravus 113 

Order  Carnirora Ill 

Patrioft-lis 114 

ulta 114 

Sinopa :  11<5 

ra]ias 116 

eximia ■■ 1^^ 


;/;^ 


H  CONTENTS. 

MAMMALIA— Coutiniu'd. 

Order  Carinvora.  Page. 

Uiutaoyon 118 

eclax 118 

voras V.>0 

Order  Iiiscct'ivora • \->Q 

Oiiiomys '. li>0 

Carter! 120 

Palaaacodon 122 

veriTs 122 

Wasbakius ■ 123 

iusiguis 123 

Elotboriiiiii 124 

EEPTILIA 125 

Order  CrocodiUa 125 

Crocodilus ' 125 

aptus 126 

Elliotti 12G 

Order  Chi-lonia .• 132 

Testudo 132 

Corsoni  '. 132 

Emys    140 

•vvyomingensis 140 

Bapteniys 154 

wyoraingensis 157 

Baena 160 

arenoaa ' Kil 

Cbisteruoii 169 

undatam  1G9 

Hybemys 174 

arenariiia 174 

Auosteira 174 

oruata 174 

Trionyx 176 

guttatus 176 

uintaeusis 178 

Remains  of  Trionyx  of  undetermined  species 180 

Order  LaccrllUa 180 

Sani wa  181 

ensidens 181 

major 182 

Gly  ptosaurus 182 

Cbameleo 184 

pristinus - 184 

FISHES 184 

Amia  (Protamia)  uiutaensis 185 

media 188 

gracilis 188 

Hypaniia 189 

elegans 189 

Lepidosteus 189 

atrox 189 

(?) 190 

simplex 191 

notabilis 192 

Pimelodus 193 

antiquus - 193 

Pbareodus 193 

acutus 193 


CONTENTS.  *J 

FISHES— ContiiiMcil.  Page. 

REMAINS  OF  FISHES  FROM  THE  SHALES  OF  GREEN  RIVER,  WYOMING m 

C'lnpea 195 

huiuilis 195 

alta 1% 

DESCRIPTION    OF   REMAINS   OF  MAMMALS   FROM    THE    TERTIARY  FORMATION    OF 

SWEETWATER  RIVER,  Vv'YOMING 198 

MAMMALIA 199 

Order  Itumhiaiitia 199 

Jleiycoehcerus 199 

rusticus 199 

sp.  (?) 208 

Order  Sorulmujii!"  ■■■■ 208 

DESCRIPTION    OF    VERTEBRATE    FOSSILS    FEOxM    THE    TERTIARY    FORMATION    OF 

JOHN  DAY'S  RIVER,  OREGON 210 

MAMMALIA 211 

Order  liiiminaiitia 211 

Oreodon 211 

Culbertsoui 211 

superbus 211 

Leptomeryx 21(j 

E  vansi 210 

AgriocbcBrus 216 

autiqiius 210 

latifrous , 216 

Order  Ariiodactijla _ 210 

Dicotyles 216 

pristiuus 216 

Elotberium 217 

imperator 217 

Order  Solidungula „ 218 

Ancbitherium 218 

Bairdi 218 

Condoui 218 

Order  Pcrissodactyla 219 

Lopbiodou 219 

Rhinoceros 220 

besperius 220 

pacificus 221 

Hadrobyiis 222 

supremus 222 

An  luidetermiued  carnivore 223 

CHELONIA 223 

Styletiiys 223 

uebrascensis 224 

niobrarensis 225 

oregouensis ' 226 

DESCRIPTION   OF   REMAINS   OF    VERTEBRATA    FROM    TERTIARY    FORMATIONS    OF 

DIFFERENT  STATES  AND  TERRITORIES  WEST  OF  THE  MISSISSIPPI  RIVER 227 

MAMMALIA 227 

Order  Carnivora 227 

Felis 227 

augustus 227 

imperialis 228 

Canis 230 

indianeusis 2:;0 

Order  Proboscidea 231 

Mastodon 231 

obscurus 231 

mirificus 237 

iimericanus 237 

II — U 


10  CONTENTS. 

MAMMALIA— Coutinuoil. 

Order  Prohoscidca.  Pa^o. 

Elephas 03^ 

americauus o^^ 

Megacerops 239 

coloradensis 239 

Order  SoUdungula 242 

Equus 242 

occidentalia 242 

major 244 

Hippariou 247 

Prof ohiiipus  s.  Merychippus 248 

Auchitherium 250 

australe 250 

agreste 251 

(?) 252 

Order  Ruminantia 253 

Bisou 253 

latifrous _. 253 

AucUenia 255 

hesterna 255 

Procamelus 258 

virginiensis 259 

Megalomerys 2()0 

niobrarensis 230 

CHELONIA 260 

Emys 260 

petrolei 260 

FISHES 201 

Family  Ci/prinida; 262 

Mylocyprinus 262 

robustus 262 

Family  Eaice 264 

Oncobatis 264 

pentagouus 264 

DESCRIPTION    OF    REMAINS  OF  REPTILES  AND    FISHES    FROM  THE   CRETACEOUS 

FORMATION  OF  THE  INTERIOR  OF  THE  UNITED   STATES 266 

REPTILES 267 

Order  Dinonaurla 267 

PoicilopleuroQ 267 

valena 267 

Order  Chdonia 269 

Order  Mosusauria 270 

Tylosaurus 271 

dyspelor 271 

proriger 271 

Lcstosaurns 276 

coryphiBus 276 

Mosasaurua 279 

Clidastes 281 

iutermedius 281 

affiuis 283 

Order  Lacertilia 285 

Tylostens 285 

ornat  ns 285 

Order  Sauroj)tcrijfjia 286 

Oligosimus 286 

graudajvus 286 

Nothosaurus 287 

occiduna 287 

FISHES 288 

Teleostei 288 


CONTENTS.  ]  1^ 

FISHES— Continued.  Pago 

Order  Acanthoptai 288 

Spliyrajnidao 288 

Cladocyclus 288 

occidentalis 288 

Enchodns 289 

Shuniardi 289 

Phasganodus 289 

dirns : 289 

Older  Malacopteri 291 

Silurida) 991 

XiiJhaotinus : 291 

audax  .  291 

Ganoidei 292 

Pycuodus 292 

faba 292 

Hadrodus 294 

prisons 295 

Elasiiobi:axciiii 295 

Order  Plagiostomi 295 

Ptychodus  Mortoui 295 

occidentalis 298 

Whippleyi 300 

Acrodns :500 

humilis 300 

Galeocerdo 301 

falcatns 301 

Oxyrhina 302 

extenta 302 

Lamna  s.  Oxy rbiua 303 

Otodus 305 

divaricatus 305 

Order  Holocephali 306 

.Edaphodon 306 

mirificus 306 

Eumylodus 309 

laqneatns 309 

NOTICE  OF  SOME  REMAINS  OF  FISHES  FROM  THE  CARBONIFEROUS  FORMATION  OF 

KANSAS 311 

Order  Plagiostomi 31] 

Cladodus 311 

occidentalis    311 

Xystracanthus 312 

arcuatns 312 

Pctalodus 312 

alleghauiensis 312 

Asteracanthus .  313 

siderius 313 

SYNOPSIS  OF  THE  EXTINCT  VERTEBRATA  DESCRIBED  OR  NOTICED  IN  THE  PRESENT 

WORK : 315 


Philadelphia,  January  13,  1873. 
Dear  Sir:  Herewith  I  transmit  to  you  my  report  on  vertebrate  fossils  from 
the  Western  Territories  and  States.  Many  of  the  specimens  were  collected 
during  your  geological  explorations,  and  were  submitted  to  me  for  investiga- 
tion. Others  have  been  collected  by  different  persons  living  in  the  West, 
and  sent  to  me  directly,  or  through  the  agency  of  the  Smithsonian  Institution, 
for  examination.  Most  of  the  fossils  were  obtained  in  Wyoming,  and  the 
others  were  derived  from  Oregon,  California,  New  Mexico,  Idaho,  Colorado, 
Kansas,  and  Nebraska. 

With  respect,  I  remain,  at  your  service, 

JOSEPH   LEIDY. 
Professor  F.  V.  Hayden, 


United  States  Geologist.- 


2   G 


PREFACE. 


The  present  work  was  commenced  in  1870,  at  which  time  the  amonnt  of 
materials  as  subjects  of  investigation  and  description  was  comparatively  small. 
A  constant  accession  of  new  materials,  beyond  all  anticipation,  has  greatly 
extended  the  work.  This  will  account  for  the  apparent  want  of  system  in 
the  arrangement  or  proper  collocation  of  the  subjects  of  many  of  the  plates. 

The  interest  excited  by  the  numerous  discoveries  of  vertebrate  fossils  in 
the  Western  States  and  Territories  has  led  to  the  recent  explorations  of  Pro- 
fessors Marsh  and  Cope,  both  of  whom  have  obtained  rich  collections.  The 
investigations  and  descriptions,  by  these  gentlemen,  of  some  of  the  fossils 
from  the  same  localities,  have  been  so  nearly  contemporary  with  my  own,  that, 
from  want  of  the  opportunity  of  comparison  of  specimens,  we  have  no  doubt 
in  some  cases  described  the  same  things  under  different  names,  and  thus  pro- 
duced some  confusion,  which  can  only  be  corrected  in  future. 

My  investigations,  in  many  instances,  may  appear  not  so  complete  as  would 
be  desirable,  and  my  excuse  for  not  doing  the  work  more  thoroughly  is  the 
limited  time  allowed  for  the  purpose  and  the  little  leisure  I  have  had  in  the 
intervals  of  other  and  necessary  professional  engagements. 


EXTINCT  VERTEBRATE  FAUNA  OF  THE  BRIDGER  TERTIARY 
FORMATION  OF  WYOMING  TERRITORY. 


INTRODUCTION. 


The  following  pages  contain  a  liescrijjtion  of  foysil  remains  of  vertebrated 
animals  collected  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger,  a  military  post  situated  in 
the  southwest  corner  of  Wyoming  Territory. 

Many  of  the  specimens  were  obtained  during  Professor  Hayden's  geological 
explorations  of  1869  and  1870,  but  the  greater  part  of  them  were  collected 
during  the  same  years  and  the  succeeding  one  by  Dr.  James  Van  A.  Carter, 
residing  at  Fort  Bridger,  and  by  Dr.  Joseph  K.  Corson,  United  States  Army, 
the  surgeon  of  the  post.  These  gentlemen  have  diligently  explored  a  wide 
extent  of  country  in  their  immediate  neighborhood  in  the  search  for  fossils 
with  the  most  intelligent  interest.  The  results  of  their  explorations  they 
h:ive  liberally  placed  at  the  service  of  naturalists  by  voluntarily  donating 
all  the  more  characteristic  portions  of  their  collections  to  the  Academy  of 
Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia.* 

After  the  present  work  was  supposed  to  be  nearly  ready  for  the  press,  and 
the  accompanying  plates  from  I  to  XXII  were  complete,  the  last  summer,  the 
writer  received  a  pressing  invitation  from  his  friend  Dr.  Carter  to  visit  him 
at  Fort  Bridger.  As  the  invitation  was  accompanied  with  liberal  facilities 
and  offers  of  aid  in  exploration,  the  author  availed  himself  of  the  opportunity 
of  visiting  a  region  of  so  .much  interest,  and  accordingly  spent  the  summer 
vacation  in  a  trip  to  the  locality. 

Fort  Bridger  occupies  a  situation  in  the  midst  of  a  wide  plain  at  the  base  of 
the  Uintah  Mountains,  and  at  an  altitude  of  nearly  seven  thousand  feet  above 
the  ocean-level.  The  neighboring  country,  extending  from  the  Uintah  and 
Wahsatch  Mountains  on  the  south  and  west  to  the  Wind  River  Range  on  the 
northeast,  at  the  close  of  the  Cretaceous  epoch,  appears  to  have  been  occupied 

*  In  speakiug  of  this  institutiou  hereafter  I  shall  briefly  refer  to  It  as  the  Academy, 
or  the  Academy  of  Phihulelphia. 


16 

by  a  vast  fresh-water  lake.  Abundance  of  evidence  is  found  to  prove  that 
the  region  was  then  inhabited  by  animals  as  numerous  and  varied  as  those  of 
any  other  fauna,  recent  or  extinct,  in  other  parts  of  the  world.  Then,  too,  a 
rich  tropical  vegetation  covered  the  country,  in  strange  contrast  to  its  present 
almost  lifeless  and  desert  condition. 

The  country  appears  to  have  undergone  slow  and  gradual  elevation ;  and 
the  great  Uintah  lake,  as  we  may  designate  it,  was  emptied,  apparently  in  suc- 
cessive portions  and  after  long  intervals,  initil  finally  it  was  drained  to  the 
bottom. 

The  ancient  lake-deposits  now  form  the  basis  of  the  country,  and  appear 
as  extensive  plains,  which  have  been  subjected  to  a  great  amount  of  erosion, 
resulting  in  the  production  of  deep  valleys  and  wide  basins,  traversed  by 
Green  River  and  its  tributaries,  which  have  their  sources  in  the  mountain 
boundaries.  From  the  valley  of  Green  River  the  flat-topped  hills  rise  in  suc- 
cession as  a  series  of  broad  table-lands  or  terraces,  extending  to  the  flanks  of 
the  surrounding  mountains. 

The  snows  of  the  Uintah,  Wahsateh,  and  other  mountain-ranges  are  a 
never-failing  source  to  the  principal  streams  ;  but  many  of  the  lesser 
branches,  dependent  for  their  supply  on  the  accumulated  snows  of  winter  in 
ravines  of  the  lower  hills  and  plains,  completely  dry  up  as  the  snows  disap- 
pear with  the  approach  and  advance  of  summer.  The  country  for  the  most 
part  is  treeless  and  destitute  even  of  large  shrubs,  excepting  along  some  of 
the  water-courses.  The  principal  streams  are  fringed  with  trees,  consisting  of 
cotton-wood  {Populus  angustifolia)  and  willow,  (Salix  longifoUa ;)  and  the 
valleys  through  which  they  run  produce  mostly  rushes  (Juncus  baltlcus)  and 
sedges,  with  some  coarse  grasses,  as  Eli/ in  us  condensatus  and  Triticum  repens. 
Hollows  of  the  liills  and  narrow  valleys,  favorable  to  the  retention  of  moisture, 
support  foi'ests  of  small  aspens,  {Fopulus  tremuloides.)  The  higher  terraces 
and  foot-hills  approaching  the  mountain-ranges  are  covered  with  dense  forests 
of  aspens,  pines,  {Pinus  ponderosa  and  P.  fle.rUis,)  and  firs,  (Abies  Menziesil, 
A.  Engelmanni,  A.  grandis,  SjC.,~)  with  a  rich  undergrowth  of  herbaceous 
plants.  The  great  mountains  themselves  present  a  broad  belt  of  pines  and 
firs,  from  which  project  the  rocky  sunrmits  as  bare  of  vegetation  as  the  wide 
plains  at  their  l)ase.  Many  of  the  lower  hill-sides  and  hollows  in  certain 
situations  are  sparsely  covered   with  cedars,  (Juniperus  virginiana,)  most  of 


17 

which  are  very  okl  in  appearance  and  remarkably  distorted,  twisted,  and 
broken. 

The  principal  growth  of  the  plains  consists  of  sage-l>ushes  {Arteiiiesia  tri- 
dentatii)  curiously  distorted  and  split,  so  as  to  I'eniind  one  of  the  cedars  just 
mentioned.  In  some  places  the  sage-bushes  are  mingled  witii  or  replaced  I>y 
the  gi-ease-wood,  {Sarcobatus  vermiculatus.)  Wide,  bare,  path-like  intervals 
surround  the  bushes,  or  the  spaces  are  occupied  by  scanty  grass,  which 
formerly  furnished  food  to  the  buffalo,  now  become  extinct  in  this  region 
and  elsewhere  west  of  the  Rocky  Mountains.* 

The  fossils  which  form  the  subjects  of  our  communication  for  the  most 
part  were  derived  from  tire  more  superficial  deposits  of  the  great  Uintah  basin, 
which  Professor  Hayden  has  distinguished  as  the  Bridger  group  of  beds. 
These  compose  the  terraces  or  table-lands  in  the  neighborhood  of  Fort 
Bridger,  and  consist  of  nearly  horizontal  strata  of  variously  colored  indurated 
clays  and  sandstones.  As  the  beds  wear  away,  through  atmospheric  agencies, 
on  the  naked  declivities  of  the  flat-topped  hills,  the  fossils  become  exposed  to 
view  and  tumble  down  to  the  base  of.  the  hills  among  the  crumbling  debris 
of  the  beds. 

The  flat-topped  hills  or  terraces  of  the  Bridger  basin,  rising  from  Ijroad 
valleys  and  extended  plains,  form  the  most  conspicuous  objects  of  the  land- 
scape. A  similar  condition  of  the  country,  alternating  with  boundless  plains 
and  great  mountain  heights,  forms  a  charactei'istic  feature  of  a  great  part  ol 
the  region  west  of  the  Mississippi. 

The  flat-topped  hills,  table-lands,  bench-lands,  or  terraces,  as  they  are 
variously  named,  seen  from  lower  levels,  are  usually  called  "buttes,"  especially 
when  they  are  of  limited  extent.  The  name  is  of  French  origin,  and  signifies 
a  bank  of  earth  or  rising  ground.  The  name  is  likewise  applied  in  a  more 
restricted  sense  to  the  prominent  irregularities  of  the  deeply  eroded  and 
naked  declivities  of  the  more  extended  terraces.  The  buttes  therefore  vary 
in  extent  from  a  mere  mound  rising  slightly  above  the  level  of  the  plains  to 

*  It  has  already  become  a  question  whether  the  buffalo  existed  west  of  the  Eocky 
Mountains  at  a  couiparativelj'  recent  period.  That  it  did  so  was  amply  proved  to  the 
writer  from  his  having  noticed  rem.ains  of  the  animal  in  a  number  of  places,  from  ravines 
skirting  the  Union  Paciiic  liailroad  to  the  forests  high  up  in  the  foothills  of  the  Uintali 
Mountains.  Judge  W.  A.  Garter,  of  Fort  Bridger,  informs  us  that  some  of  the  old  trap- 
pers iuid  hunters  of  the  district  had  told  him  that  in  their  early  days  they  had  seen  the 
buffalo  in  abundance  in  that  country. 


18 

hills  of  varied  configuration  reaching  to  the  level  ol'  the  broarler  buttes  or  ter- 
I'aces.  In  the  course  of  ages  the  wearing  away  of  these  has  been  enormous 
and  still  continues  under  the  usual  atmospheric  agencies,  while  the  detritus 
is  spread  out  on  the  plains  below. 

From  the  lower  plains  the  neighboring  terraces,  when  of  circumscribed 
extent,  appear  like  vast  earth- work  fortifications,  and  when  evenly  preserved  on 
the  declivities  for  a  considerable  distance  remind  one  of  long  railway  embank- 
ments. Frequently  the  terraces  are  so  extensively  eroded  and  traversed  by 
nai'row  ravines  that  they  appear  as  great  groups  of  naked  buttes  rising  from 
the  midst  of  the  plain,  or  assembled  around  the  horizon  closely  facing  and 
flanking  the  more  distant  and  extended  lands  as  if  to  protect  them.  Nothing 
can  be  more  desolate  in  appearance  than  some  of  these  vast  assemblages  of 
crumbling  buttes,  destitute  of  vegetation  and  traversed  by  ravines,  in  which 
the  water-courses  in  midsummer  are  almost  all  completely  dried.  To  these 
assemblages  of  naked  buttes,  often  worn  into  castellated  and  fantastic  forms, 
and  extending  through  miles  and  miles  of  territory,  the"  early  Canadian 
voyageurs  gave  the  name  of  "Mauvaises  Terras''  They  occur  in  many  local- 
ities of  the  Tertiary  formations  west  of  the  Mississippi  River. 

In  wandering  through  the  "Mauvaises  Torres,''  or  "Bad  Lands,''  it  requires 
but  little  stretch  of  the  imagination  to  think  oneself  in  the  streets  of  some 
vast  ruined  and  deserted  city.  No  scene  ever  impresed  the  writer  more 
strongly  than  the  view  of  one  of  these  Bad  Lands.  In  company  with  his 
friends,  Drs.  Carter  and  Corson,  he  made  an  expedition  in  search  of  fossils 
to  Dry  Creek  Cation,*  about  forty  miles  to  the  southeast  of  Fort  Bridger. 
The  canon,  or  valley,  is  bounded  by  high  buttes,  and  contains  a  meadow  of 
rushes,  traversed  by  a  stream  which  is  liable  to  be  dried  up  in  the  latter  part 
of  the  summer,  whence  the  name  of  the  canon.  On  ascending  the  butte  to  the 
east  of  our  camp,  I  found  before  me  another  valley,  a  treeless  barren  jilain, 
prol)ably  ten  miles  in  width.  From  the  far  side  of  this  valley  butte  after 
butte  arose  and  grouped  themselves  along  the  horizon,  and  looked  together 
in  the  distance  like  the  huge  fortified  city  of  a  giant  race.  The  utter  desola- 
tion  of  the  scene,  the  dried-up  water-courses,  the  absence  of  any  moving 

*  The  same  uame  is  so  frequently  applied  to  difierent  places  as  to  lead  to  consider- 
able coufiision.  When  I  speak  of  Dry  Creek  Caiion,  I  refer  to  a  locality  forty  miles 
from  Fort  Bridger;  and  when  Dry  Creek  is  named,  it  refers  to  another  locality  ten  miles 
from  Fort  Bridger. 


If) 

ohjfcl,  and  the  profound  silence  wliicli  prevailed,  produced  a  ieeling  tluit  was 
positively  oppressive.  When  I  tlien  thought  of  the  buttes  beneath  my  feet, 
widi  their  entombed  remains  of  multitudes  of  animals  forever  extinct,  and 
reflected  upon  the  time  wlieu  the  country  teemed  with  life,  I  truly  felt  that 
I  was  standing  on  the  wreck  of  a  former  world. 

The  buttes  are  often  specially  designated  from  some  supposed  resemblance, 
or  other  character,  as  Church  Butte,  Pilot  Butte,  Grizzly  Butte,*  &c. 

As  before  intimated,,  the  more  superficial  table-lands  of  the  Bridger  basin, 
as  they  appear  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger,  are  composed  of  nearly  hori- 
zontal strata  of  various  colored  indurated  clays  and  sandstones.  In  most 
localities  visited  by  the  writer  the  clays  predominate,  and  are  usually  greenish, 
grayish  ash-colored,  and  brownish.  When  unexposed  they  arc  compact, 
homogeneous,  and  of  stony  hardness.  In  composition  they  vary  from  nearly- 
pure  clay  to  si*ch  as  are  highly  arenaceous,  and  gradate  into  those  in  whicli 
sand  largely  predominates,  and  they  usually  contain  few  or  no  pebbles.  They 
appear  to  be  more  or  less  fissnred,  and  break  with  an  irregular  and  some- 
what conchoidal  fracture.  Exposed  to  atmospheric  agencies,  moisture,  and 
frosts,  they  readily  disintegrate,  and  the  declivities  of  the  buttes,  generally 
entirely  destitute  of  vegetation,  are  usually  invested  with  crumbling  material 
from  a  few  inches  to  a  foot  or  more  in  depth.  When  this  loose  material  is 
wet  it  forms  tenacious  mud,  and  along  the  course  of  streams  in  the  ravines, 
the  deepest  and  most  treacherous  mire.  Baked  by  the  sun  upon  the  plains, 
it  fixes  the  drift-pebbles  and  other  stones  as  firmly  almost  as  if  imbedded  in 
mortar. 

In  some  localities  the  clays  of  the  buttes  abound  in  fresh-water  shells,  as 
Unio,  Melania,  Planorbis,  &c.  Less  frequently  in  other  places  they  con- 
tain land-shells,  as  Helix,  &c. 

The  sandstones  are  more  frequently  of  various  shades  of  green,  but  are 
also  yellowish  and  pass  into  shades  of  brown.  They  are  compact  and  hard 
when  unexposed  to  the  weather,  and  are  usually  fine-grained,  but  also  occur 

*This  name  is  applied  to  an  extensive  chain  of  buttes  about  ten  miles  to  the  south- 
east of  Fort  Bridger.  Judge  Carter  informed  me  that  the  name  originated  from  the 
circumstance  that  an  old  trapper,  Jack  llobinsou,  once  reported  that  he  had  found  a 
])ctrilied  grizzly  bear  on  the  Butte.  From. the  description  of  the  petrifaction  1  have 
no  doubt  it  was  that  of  the  animal  1  have  named  in  the  succeeding  pages,  Paheosyops, 
the  skull  of  which  resembles  that  of  a  bear. 


20 

of  a  gravelly  coiLslitiilion.  They  arc  fissured  in  comparatively  large  masses, 
wliicli  assume  a  rounded  lorm  as  lliey  are  worn  away,  so  that  a  ledge  of 
sandstone  projecting  from  the  declivity  of  a  Ijutte  will  appear  like  a  row  of 
cotton  Itales.  As  they  disintegrate  less  rapidly  than  the  contiguous  clays, 
masses  are  olten  ol)served  resting  upon  cones  and  columns  of  the  latter,  con- 
triljuting  greatly  to  the  picturesque  and  sometimes  fantastic  appearance  of 
the  l)uttes. 

Many  of  the  table-lands  and  lesser  buttes  in  the  vicinity  of  the  Uintah 
Mountains  are  thickly  covered  with  drift  from  the  latter,  consisting  of  gravel 
and  bowlders  of  red  and  gray  compact  sandstones  or  quartzites.  The  drift 
material  is  usually  firmly  imbedded  in  the  surface  of  the  plains  so  as  to 
appear  like  a  pavement.  The  bowlders  are  generally  small,  but  assume  larger 
proportions  approaching  the  Uintahs.  In  many  cases  the  drift  completely 
covers  the  terraces  or  buttes,  descending  upon  the  declivities  s©  as  entirely  to 
conceal  their  structure.  Usually,  however,  it  accumulates  in  the  ravines  of 
the  declivities,  leaving  bare  the  intervening  ridges  of  light-colored  clays  and 
sandstones.  Many  of  the  buttes  are  nearly  or  quite  free  of  drift  material. 
Some,  again,  are  strewn  with  fragments  of  rock,  consisting  of  tlie  harder  materials 
from  the  terraces  themselves,  and  these  likewise  occur  mingled  with  the 
drift-pebbles  and  bowlders  from  the  mountain-heights. 

The  stone-fragments  from  the  buttes  consist  of  harder  siliceous  and  cal- 
careous clays,  impure  limestones,  jaspers,  and  less  frequently  agate  and  chalce- 
dony. In  some  instances  they  consist  of  singularly  black  incrusted  and 
niinided  sandstones,  somewhat  of  the  character  of  scptaria.  Specimens  ot 
these  occasionally  !;)ear  a  resend:)lance  to  fossil  turtles,  and  when  found  wWh 
I  he  harder  crust  broken  tluy  look  like  turtle-shells  filled  with  a  sandstone 
matri.x. 

In  the  buttes  in  the  vicinity  of  Carter  Station,  on  tiie  Union  Pacific  Rail- 
road, I  observed  many  large  nodular  and  cylindroid  masses  of  agate.  These 
have  a  concentric  arrangement  of  layers  resembling  that  of  fossil  wood,  for 
which  they  arc,  taken.  Many  of  the  masses  contain  a  nucleus  of  amber- 
colored  crystals  of  calcitc. 

Nodules  of  chalcedony  wilh  dendritic  markings  occur  in  some  of  the 
buttes.  These,  together  with  the  condition  of  many  of  the  fossils  of  the 
buttes,  indicate  the  presence  of  a  considerable  proportion  of  soluble  silica  in 


21 

the  waters  of  tlie  ancient  lake.  In  sonic  ol'  tlie  sandstones,  the  fossil  shells 
have  had  their  lime  completely  replaced  by  clear  chalcedony.* 

Occasionally  strata  of  limestone,  mostly  impure  from  the  admixinre  of  elay 
and  sand,  arc  found  in  some  of  the  buttes.  A  frequent  constituent  also  is 
tiltrous  arragonitc,  or  satin-spar,  in  tliin  seams.  Many  of  the  bare  mounds  of 
clay  among  the  buttes  are  thickly  strewn  with  fragments   of   this  arragonite. 

The  stones  imbedded  in  the  surface  of  the  plains  and  Inittes,  in  some 
positions  favorable  for  the  purpose,  are  highly  polished  from  the  conjoined 
action  of  the  wind  and  sand,  and  when  seen  in  the  slanting  light  of  the  early 
morning  or  evening  sun,  appear  like  myriads  of  scattered  mirrors.  In  many 
positions,  the  stones,  no  matter  what  may  be  their  composition,  are  all  black- 
ened.    The  phenomenon  I  could  not  explain. 

In  many  places  the  stone-fragraents  from  the  declivities  of  the  terraces, 
strewn  over  the  lower  buttes  or  distributed  over  the  plains,  are  splintered  or 
flaked  in  a  remarkable  manner.  The  jaspers  esi^ecially  are  often  broken  in 
such  a  way  that  they  appear  as  spawls  from  rude  implements  of  art,  or  even 
resemble  the  latter.  Some  of  them  are  certainly  the  work  of  primitive  man, 
I)ut  the  vast  proportion,  often  scattered  over  miles  of  surface,  are  probal)ly 
accidental  forms.*  These  I  suppose  to  have  been  produced  by  stones  striking 
one  another  in  the  descent  from  declivities  as  they  have  been  carried  down, 
perhaps  by  glacial  movement.  The  softer  rocks  of  the  buttes,  those  which 
are  too  soft  for  stone  works  of  art,  are  also  observed  broken  in  the  same  way 
as  the  hard  ones.  In  experimenting  on  some  large  splintered  slabs  of  jasper 
from  the  buttes  of  Dry  Creek  Canon,  I  found  that  a  quick  blow  of  a  hammer 
would  send  off,  with  a  ringing  sound,  a  long  sharp  flake,  reminding  me  of  the 
primitive  knives  or  scra])ers  of  the  stone  age  of  man. 

Between  the  well-finished  implement  and  the  accidental  spawl  every  gra- 
dation of  form  may  be  observed  among  the  scattered  stones  of  the  plains  and 

*  Perhaps  much  of  this  soluble  silica  may  have  been  supplied  by  hot  springs  still  so 
frequent  in  Wyoming  and  other  Western  Territories.  Cold  springs,  slightly  alkaline, 
may  have  also  coutributcd  to  the  petrifying  silica.  In  Pioneer  Hollow,  flfteen  miles 
west  of  Fort  Bridger,  I  observed  a  dozen  springs  within  the  distance  of  a  mile,  tiie 
water  of  which  reminded  me  of  the  congress- water  of  Saratoga,  New  York.  It  is  cool 
and  clear,  highly  carbonated,  slightly  alkaline,  and  agreeable  to  the  taste.  The  springs 
are  circular,  from  1  to  15  feet  across,  and  are  surrounded  with  dome-like  craters  from 
1  to  3  feet  high.  The  craters  are  formed  of  a  siliceous  sinter,  which  has  been  slowly 
deposited  from  the  spring- water,  and  is  probably  the  accuniulation  of  ages,  The  sinter 
is  brown  from  the  presence  of  iron,  though  the  water  has  no  perceptibly  ferruginous 
appearance  or  taste. 


22 

Ijiittes.     The   accompanying-   figures,    from   1   to   12,   represent  some  of   the 
Haked  stones,  most  of  which,  and  perhaps  all,  are  rude  works  of  art. 

Many  of  the  accidental  forms,  as  well  as  those  more  nearly  resembling 
artificial  implements,  if  they  are  not  actually  such,  appear  greatly  to  differ  in 
age.  Some  of  the  specimens  are  as  sharp  and  fresh  in  appearance  as  if  Ijut 
recently  shivered  from  the  parent  block,  while  others  are  so  mucli  worn  and 
so  deeply  altered  from  exposure  that  they  look  to  be  of  ancient  date.  In 
some  of  these  old-looking  specimens  .the  jasper,  originally  brown  or  black, 
has  become  dull  white  and  yellow  tlie  depth  of  one-fourth  of  an  inch  from 
the  surface.* 

*Iu  tbis  relatiou  I  luay  take  the  opportuuity  to  refer  to  one  of  the  simplest  of  stoue 
iiuplemeuts,  still  in  use,  and  which,  if  it  had  alone  been  found  among  the  flaked  ma- 
terials of  the  butte.s,  would  certainly  have  been  viewed  as  an  accidental  spawl.  During 
uiy  stay  at  Fort  Cridger,  the  Shoshone  Indians  made  a  visit  to  the  post  and  encamped 
in  its  vicinity  for  a  week.  Being  the  first  time  that  I  had  had  an  opportunity  of  seeing 
a  tribe  of  Indians,  I  felt  much  interest  in  observing  them.  While  wandering  through 
their  camp  I  noticed  the  women  dressing  buffalo-skins  with  a  stone  implement,  the 
only  one  of  this  material  I  found  in  use  among  them.  A  serrated  scraper  of  iron  was 
also  employed,  but  the  stone  implement  was  clearly  a  common  and  important  one.  It 
was  a  spawl  from  a  quartzite  bowlder  made  by  a  single  smart  blow  with  another  stone. 
It  is  circular  or  oval,  plano-convex,  and  with  a  sharp  edge.  The  implement  is  repre- 
sented in  the  accompanying  figure  13,  and  according  to  Dr.  Garter,  who  is  quite 
familiar  with  the  language  and  habits  of  the  Shoshoues,  is  called  by  them  a  "  te-sho-a." 
By  a  happj^  accident  I  learned  that  it  was  not  a  mere  recent  instrument  incidental  to 
the  time  and  place. 

While  on  an  excursion  after  fossils,  in  com])any  with  Dr.  Carter,  I  noticed  on  the  side 
of  a  butte  a  few  weathered  human  bones,  to  which  I  directed  the  attention  of  my  friend. 
On  further  examination,  we  found  others,  together  with  some  perforated  canines 
of  the  elk  and  one  of  the  identical  "teshoa"  above  described.  Dr.  Carter  observed 
that  the  Shoshones  sometimes  buried  their  dead  upon  the  top  of  prominent  buttes, 
and  these  remains  had  fallen  from  the  grave  of  a  squaw,  which  in  the  cour.se  of  time 
had  become  exposed  by  the  wearing  away  of  the  edge  of  the  butte.  The  bones  and 
elk-tusks  were  much  weathered.  Their  appearance  and  the  probable  circumstance 
that  several  years  had  elapsed  before  the  butte  could  wear  away  to  reach  'the  grave, 
appear  to  be  sufBcient  evidence  that  the  "teshoa"  was  an  implement  of  common  use. 

To  this  note  I  may  add  a  remark  relating  to  the  perforated  canines  of  the  elk.  They 
are  worn  as  ornamental  trophies  by  the  Shoshones  and  other  Indians.  In  a  recent 
number  of  the  American  Journal  of  Science  and  Art,  for  1872,  page  211,  in  a  notice 
"On  fossil  man  of  the  cavern  of  Brousse-rousse,  in  Italy,  by  E.  Riviere."  I  notice  that, 
besides  a  human  skeleton  associated  with  the  bones  of  many  extinct  animals,  there 
were  also  found  several  flint  knives  and  a  number  of  perforated  canines  of  the  stag. 
In  addition  to  the  common  form  of  many  of  the  stone  implements,  this  is  a  significant  fact 
bearing  on  the  probability  of  a  common  origin  to  the  races  of  man.  One  of  the  siieci- 
mens  of  perforated  tusks  of  the  elk  from  the  Indian  grave  is  represented  in  Fig.  11, 
at  the  end  of  this  introductory  chapter. 


23 

As  the  clays  ami  saiulstoiies  of  the  Bridger  terraces  and  builds  cniiiiblo 
away,  a  variety  of  renuiins  of  terrestrial  and  fresh-water  animals  are  exposed 
(o  view.  lu  some  of  the  buttes  they  are  comparatively  aljundant;  in  otiiers, 
they  are  rare.  The  fossils  consist  of  the  bones  and  teeth  of  vertebrates,  and 
the  shells  of  molliisks.  Fragments  of  silicified  wood  also  occur,  though 
not  frequently.  Shells  of  the  san.dstones  are  composed  of  chalcedony ;  Ijut 
those  imbedded  in  the  indurated  clays  usually  retain  their  carbonate  of  lime 

The  fossil  bones  are  completely  petrified ;  that  is  to  say,  their  more  per- 
ishable constituents  have  been  replaced  mainly  by  siliceous  matter.  They 
are  frequently  as  black  as  ebony ;  and  the  teeth  are  usually  black,  with  the 
enamel  highly  lustrous.  Often  they  are  brownish,  with  a  greenish  aspect, 
derived  from  the  greenish  matrix  in  which  they  were  imbedded.  They  are 
also  found  of  a  yellowish  clay  color  and  duller  aspect. 

Many  of  the  bones  are  more  or  less  crushed  and  distorted,  as  a  result  of 
the  pressure  of  the  superincumbent  strata.  The  fragments  are  generally  but 
slightly  dislocated,  showing  that  the  crushing  occurred  while  they  were 
imbedded.  The  stronger  bones  are  often  well  preserved,  especially  the  rami 
of  lower  jaws  and  teeth,  and  the  smaller  bones  of  the  wrist  and  ankle. 
Whole  skulls  are  exceedingly  rare,  and  when  discovered  are  much  crushed 
and  distorted. '  Turtle-shells  are  among  the  most  frequent  fossils,  but  are 
usually  more  or  less  fractured,  crushed,  and  distorted.  In  searching  over 
the  buttes,  little  piles  of  bone-fragments  are  often  seen  diverging  froni  a 
prominent  point.  These,  on  examination,  generally  prove  to  be  the  remains 
of  a  turtle-shell  which,  after  exposure,  has  fallen  to  pieces. 

Generally  the  fossils  are  sharply  preserved ;  that  is  to  say,  they  rarely 
have  a  rolled  or  water-worn  appearance,  indicating  that  bones  and  shells 
were  soon  enveloped  in  mud  at  the  bottom  of  comjjaratively  quiet  water.  In 
the  gravelly  strata  rolled  fragments  of  bones  are  found. 

Nearly  all  the  fossils  collected  from  the  Bridger  I)eds,  and  descriljed  in 
the  succeeding  pages,  have  been  collected  as  loose  specimens  picked  up  on 
the  surface  of  the  buttes.  No  excavations  have  been  made  into  the  latter  in 
search  of  fossils,  except  to  exhume  a  partially  exposed  bone,  or  some  parts 
of  a  skeleton  supposed  to  be  contiguous  to  specimens  lying  in  view  on  the 
surface.  Usually  only  a  few  pieces  of  a  skeleton  have  been  found  together, 
and  in  no  instance  has  a  complete  one  been  discovered  which  has  been 
brought  to  my  notice.    Generally,  too,  there  has  been  no  certainty  that  bones 


24 

or  iVagments  tbiiiul  together  belonged  to  tlie  same  .skeleton,  and  in  must 
instances  they  have  appeared  to  belong  to  several  ditierent  animals. 

The  remains  of  vertel)rates  thus  far  discovered  in  the  Bridger  Tertiary 
formation  represent  all  classes  except  Batrachians,  and  these  no  doubt 
formed  members  of  the  ancient  fliuna :  but  their  delicate  bones  have,  as  yet, 
escaped  detection. 

The  remains  of  mammals  are  especially  numerous,  and  they  belong  to 
many  genera,  most  of  which  are  extinct,  and  had  not  been  previously 
described  or  tbund  elsewhere.  The  greater  proportion  of  the  mammals  were 
odd-toed  pachyderms,  whose  nearest  living  allies  are  the  tapirs.  Proboscidian 
and  equine  forms  appear  to  have  been  sparsely  represented.  Even-toed 
pachyderms  were  comparatively  few ;  and  ruminants,  whose  remains  are  so 
abundant  and  varicil  in  the  later  Tertiary  formations  east  of  the  Rocky 
Mountains,  appear  to  have  been  absent.  The  other  remains  of  mammals 
belong  to  rodents,  insectivores,  and  carnivores,  nearly  all  of  extinct  genera, 
not  previously  described  nor  found  in  other  localities.  Primates,  bats,  mar- 
supials, and  edentates  are  probably  represented,  but  have  not  been  certainly 
recognized  among  the  fossils  which  I  have  had  the  opportunity  of  examining. 
The  nature  of  the  formation  from  which  the  remains  are  obtained  is  such 
that  we  do  not  expect  to  find  evidences  of  the  remaining  orders  of  mammals. 

No  remains  of  birds  have  come  under  my  notice;  but  Professor  Marsh, 
who  has  explored  the  Bridger  Tertiary  beds  with  unusual  facilities  and  great 
diligence,  has  reported  the  discovery  of  specimens  which  he  attributes  to  half 
a  dozen  species  of  two  extinct  and  previously  unknown  genera.* 

Of  reptiles,  the  remains  of  turtles  are,  perhaps,  the  most  abundant  fossils 
met  with  in  the  buttes  of  the  Bridger  basin.  They  belong  to  a  number  of 
different  genera,  several  of  which  are  extinct,  but  others  belong  to  genera 
still  in  existence.  Most  of  them  are  aquatic  forms,  but  one  at  least  was  a 
land-tortoise.  The  number  of  species  and  genera  is  in  striking  contrast  with 
the  single  species,  represented  by  a  multitude  of  individuals  in  the  Tertiary 
deposits  of  White  River,  Dakota,  and  of  Niobrara  River,  Nebraska. 

The  turtle  remains  mostly  consist  of  the  shells,  often  nearly  complete, 
and  sometimes  including  other  bones  ot^  the  skeleton  imbedded  in  the  interior 
matrix. 

The   remains  of  crocodiles,   which    are   entirely    wanting   in    the  White 

*  Am.  Jour.  Sc,  1872,  p.  25G, 


25 

River  iind  Niobrara  Tertiaries  just   mentioned,  are  frequeiil  in   the   Ijiidger 
beds,  and  represent  several  species. 

Remains  of  lizards  also,  allied  to  the  modern  iguana  and  monitor,  are 
found  as  associates  of  the  Bridger  fauna.  Professor  Marsh  has  likewise 
reported  the  discovery  of  remains  of  serpents,  which  he  ascribes  to  several 
species  and  genera. 

Multitudes  of  well-preserved  fresh-water  fishes  are  found  in  the  Green 
River  shales.  They  are  chiefly  cypi'inodonts  and  herrings,  and,  for  the  most 
part,  have  been  described  by  Professor  Cope. 

Black,  shining,  enameled  scales,  teeth,  and  vertebrae  of  ganoid  fislies  are 
frequent  among  the  fossils  of  the  Bridger  beds. 

The  Tertiary  strata  of  Green  River  and  its  tributai'ies,  including  the 
latter,  as  indicated  l)y  the  character  of  the  vertebrate  fossils,  are  much  older 
than  the  tertiaries  of  the  Mauvaises  Terres  of  AVhite  River,  Dakota,  and  of 
the  Niobrara  River,  Nebraska.  They  overlie  the  cretaceous  rocks,  with  wiiich 
they  are  unconformable,  and  they  are  probably  contemporaneous  with  the 
Eocene  formations  of  Europe. 

Attention  was  first  directed  to  the  Green  River  Tertiary  formation, 
which  has  proved  to  be  so  rich  in  tlie  remains  of  vertebrates,  by  the  late  Dr. 
John  E.  Evans,  as  early  as  1856.  From  Green  River  he  obtained  a  speci- 
men of  shale,  witli  a  well-preserved  fish,  represented  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  XVII, 
of  tlie  present  work,  and  briefly  described  by  the  writer,  under  the  name  of 
Clupea  humiUs,  in  the  proceedings  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of 
Philadelphia,  for  October,  1856. 

In  1868  Dr.  J.  Van  A.  Carter,  of  Fort  Bridger,  in  correspondence  with 
the  author,  informed  him  of  the  frequent  occuri-ence  of  the  remains  of  turtles 
and  other  animals  in  the  buttes  of  the  neighboring  country.  The  same  year 
Professor  Hayden,  during  his  geological  explorations,  obtained  remains  of  a 
Trionyx  from  Church  Buttes.  Colonel  John  H.  Knight,  United  States  Army, 
also  procured  a  vertebra  of  an  extinct  crocodile  from  the  same  formation  of 
Bitter  Creek.  These  remains,  together  with  those  of  a  small  insectivorous 
animal,  discovered  liy  Dr.  Carter  on  the  Twin  Butte,  near  Fort  Bridger,  were 
described  by  the  writer  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy  for  April,  1869. 
The  little  insectivore  was  named  Omomys  Carieri  in  honor  of  its  discoverer, 
and  is  also  described  in  "  The  Extinct  Mammalian  Fauna  of  Dakota  and 
Nebraska."  The  specimen  upon  which  it  was  characterized  is  represented  in 
4   G 


26 

Figs.  13,  14,  Plate  XXIX,  of  that  work.  Subsequently,  during  1869  and  the" 
ibllowing  years  down  to  the  present  time,  the  Green  River  basin  has  been 
sedulously  explored  by  Professor  O.  C.  Marsh  with  the  most  important  and 
fruitful  results.  In  the  abundance  of  fossils  and  the  number  of  extinct  genera 
and  species  of  vertebrates  they  represent,  his  collections  are  perhaps  not 
exceeded  by  any  obtained  from  any  one  locality  elsewhere  in  the  world. 
Professor  Marsh  has  given  a  succinct  account  of  the  geology  of  the  region  in 
the  American  Journal  of  Science  for  1871,  and  in  the  succeeding  volumes 
brief  descriptions  of  the  many  species  and  genera  of  extinct  animals  discov- 
ered hy  him. 

In  1869  Professor  Hayden,  during  his  geological  exploration  of  Wyoming, 
also  examined  the  Green  River  Tertiary  formations,  and  designated  the  more 
superficial  ones  under  the  name  of  the  Bridger  group.  The  fossils  collected 
from  the  latter  were  submitted  to  the  examination  of  the  writer,  and  are 
briefly  noticed  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy  for  1870,  and  likewise  in 
Professor  Hayden's  reports  of  1870  and  1871. 

During  the  same  and  the  succeeding  years  down  to  the  present  time,  Drs. 
Carter  and  Corson  explored  the  buttes  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger  and 
discovered  many  important  fossils.  Their  collections  from  time  to  time  were 
transmitted  to  the  author,  and  by  far  the  greater  numl)er  of  the  animals  char- 
acterized in  the  following  paper  are  indicated  from  the  specimens  of  these 
collections.  Most  of  them  have  also  been  briefly  noticed  in  the  later  volumes 
of  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy,  and  in  Professor  Hayden's  reports  for 
1870  and  1871. 

I  may  further  remark  that  during  the  last  summer  Professor  Cope  made 
an  extended  exploration  of  the  Green  River  basin,  and  ol^tained  large  collec- 
tions of  fossils,  to  a  full  account  of  which  we  look  forward  with  much  interest. 


Fig.  14.  Perforated  elk-tusk;  oue  of  a  uiimber  of  similar  specimens  fotiuil  together  with  a  "te.shoa" 
and  human  hones  which  had  fallen  from  an  old  Indian  grave,  at  the  edge  of  a  butte,  three  miles  from 
Fort  Bridger. 


27 

MAMMALIA. 

Order  Perlssodactyla. 

Hoofed  qiiat^rupeds,  with  functional  toes  in  tlie  hind  feet,  and  often  like- 
wise in  the  fore  feet,  in  uneven  number.  Arrangement  of  the  constituent 
Iol>es  of  the  crowns  of  the  molar  teeth  unsymmetrical.  Feinur  with  a  third 
trochanter.  Astragalus  with  tlie  fore  part  divided  into  tvv'o  very  unequal 
articular  facets.    • 

PAL^OSYOPS. 

Aniong  the  most  aliundant  and  interesting  of  the  mammalian  remains  from 
the  Bridger  Tertiary  group,  wliich  the  writer  has  had  the  opportunity  of 
examining,  are  those  of  a  genus  of  odd-toed  pachyderms  to  which  the  above 
name  has  been  given.  The  specimens  consist  of  fragments  of  jaws  with  teeth, 
isolated  teeth,  small  portions  of  other  parts  of  the  skull,  articular  ends  of 
the  limb-bones,  and  some  of  the  smaller  bones  of  the  feet. 

The  anatomical  characters  of  the  specimens  indicate  Palaeosyops  to  have 
been  more  nearly  related  with  the  tapirs  than  to  any  other  living  animals. 
The  jaws  were  provided  with  nearly  closed  series  of  teeth  in  full  number, 
that  is  to  say  three  Incisors,  a  canine,  four  premolars,  and  three  molars  to  each 
side  of  both  jaws.  The  canines  are  as  well  developed  proportionately  as  in 
ordinary  carnivores,  and  would  lead  one  to  suspect  that  perhaps  Palaeosyops 
used  a  mixed  diet  of  meat  and  vegetables. 

The  genus  was  originally  established  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy 
of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia  for  October,  1870,  on  specimens  of  teeth 
discovei'ed  at  Church  Buttes,  Wyoming,  during  Professor  Hayden's  geological 
exploration.  It  was  subsequently  indicated  in  Professor  Hayden's  Prelimi- 
nary Report  of  the  United  States  Geological  Survey  of  Wyoming,  published  in 
the  spring  of  1871,  and  is  there  arranged  among  the  artiodactyl  or  even-toed 
pachyderms.  Much  additional  material,  comprising  many  parts  of  the  skele- 
ton of  the  same  genus,  having  been  received  from  Drs.  Carter  and  Corson, 
its  characters  were  more  fully  ascertained,  and  its  true  position  as  a  perisso- 
dactyl  or  odd-toed  pachyderm  determined.  The  later  account  of  these  is  given 
in  Professor  Hayden's  Preliminary  Report  of  the  United  States  Geological 
Survey  of  Montana,  &c.,  published  in  the  spring  of  1872. 

Since  then  Professor  O.  C.  Marsh  has  published  a  notice  in  the  American 
Journal  of  Science  of  August,  1872,  of  some  remains  ascribed  to  two  genera 


28 

with  tlic  iKuiies  of  PaliPosyops  luul  Liiiuiohyiis.  From  tlic  iiotico  it  would 
appear  he  has  overlooked  the  description  of  Palaeosyops  in  the  report  last 
mentioned.  He  intimates  the  reference  of  the  genus  to  the  Perissodactyls  as 
if  previously  nnknown,  and  suggests  the  reference  of  specime'ris  to  it  in  which 
"the  last  upper  molar  has  two  inner  cones,"  though  it  is  distinctly  stated  in 
the  al)ove  report  that  "  the  last  upper  molar  of  Palaeosyops  has  but  a  single 
lobe  to  the  inner  part  of  the  crown."  Upon  this  character  he  founds  the  pro- 
posed genus  Limnohyus,  which,'  under  the  circumstances,  appears  untenable ; 
but  if  a  pair  of  lobes  to  the  inner  part  of  the  crown  of  the  last  molar  be  con- 
sidered a  distinctive  generic  character,  the  name  might  be  transferred  to  the 
geiuis  possessing  it. 

The  skull  of  Palseosyops,  and  the  same  may  be  said  of  other  parts  of 
the  skeleton  so  far  as  they  are  known  to  us,  approximates  in  form  and 
constitution  those  of  its  probably-  contemporaneous  ally,  the  Palseotherium 
of  the  Eocene  period  of  Euroi>e.  In  both  genera  the  skull  presents  a 
broad,  triangular  forehead.  In  Palaeosyops  it  is  more  prolonged  posteriorly, 
and  is  more  abruptly  curved  forward  to  the  root  of  the  muzzle.  In  both  the 
temporal  fossae  are  very  capacious,  indicating  masticatory  muscles  approaching 
in  power  those  of  the  great  carnivores.  In  Pateosyops  they  are  separated  by 
a  much  shorter  crest  than  in  Pateotherium.  In  the  former  the  muzzle  is  rather 
abruptly  prolonged  forward  from  the  l)ase  of  the  forehead ;  in  the  latter  the  con- 
vexity of  the  forehead  is  continued  in  the  muzzle  to  tlie  end  of  the  nose.  In 
both  genera  the  muzzle  is  broad,  but  in  Palaeosyops  the  nasals  are  longer  and 
project  forward  as  much  as  the  jaws.  The  lateral  nasal  notch  is  nearly  alike  in 
both,  but  is  longer  in  Palaeosyops.  In  both,  the  orl)its  are  open  behind,  and  are 
defined  from  the  temporal  fossffi  by  long,  angular  post-orbital  processes.  The 
jaws  nearly  repeat  one  another  in  the  two  genera.  The  number  of  teeth, 
their  kind,  relation,  and  general  construction,  are  likewise  the  same.  In 
Palaeosyops  they  form  more  unbroken  series  in  the  two  jaws,  as  tlu;  hiatus 
back  of  the  canines,  which  is  comparatively  .large  in  Paleeotherium,  is  very 
trilling  in  extent  in  Palaeosyops. 

Pal/eosyops  paludosus. 

The  species  Valceosxjops  paludosus  was  first  indicated  under  this  name  in  the 
Proceedings  of  (he  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia  in  1870,  and 
was  founded  on  a  number  of  isolated  teeth  and  fragments  of  others  oI)tained  by 
Professor  Ilayden  at  Church  Buites,  Wyoming.     Of  the  specimens,  a  last 


29 

ujipcr  pt'cmdlar  is  represented  in  Fig.  5,  Plate  V;  a  t'nignieiit  of  a  second 
upper  molar  in  Fig.  6,  Plate  XXIII,  and  two  lower  premolars  and  a  molar 
ill  Figs.  3  to  5,  of  tlic  same  plate.  The  teeth  apparently  all  belonged  to  the 
same  individual,  which  had  reached  maturity,  but  had  not  advanced  so  llxr  as 
to  have  the  summits  of  the  tooth-lobes  worn  through  so  as  to  expose  the 
dentine.  The  enamel  is  longitudinally  wrinkled  on  the  sides  of  the  true 
molars  and  in  a  less  degree  on  the  premolars. 

The  last  upper  premolar  (Fig.  5,  Plate  V)  has  a  trilolate  crown  consisting 
of  an  outer  pair  of  acute  pyramidal  lobes,  and  an  inner  larger  conical  lobe 
embraced  by  a  basal  ridge  in  front  and  l^ehind. 

The  fragment  of  an  ui)per  molar  (Fig.  6,  Plate  XXIII)  consists  of  the  tore 
jiart  of  the  crown,  and  is  composed  of  an  outer  crcscentoid  pyramidal  lobe 
and  an  inner  smaller  conical  lobe.  A  strong  convex  buttress  forms  tiie  aiitero- 
external  angle  of  the  crown,  and  a  moderate  basal  ridge  bounds  it  in  front. 
A  conspicuous  tubercle,  the  rudiment  of  an  additional  lobe,  occu|>ies  the  angu- 
lar interval  between  the  principal  lobes  and  the  basal  ridge. 

The  lower  molar  tooth  (Fig.  5)  has  a  fore  and  ait  bilobed  crown  as  in 
PaliEotheriuin  and  Titanotherium.  The  lobes  arc  crcscentoid  pyramidal,  and 
the  anterior  is  the  smaller. 

The  lower  premolars  have  the  same  essential  constitution  as  the  true  molar, 
but  are  less  well  developed.  In  the  fourth  premolar  (Fig.  4)  the  relative  size 
of  the  lobes  is  reversed,  the  anterior  being  the  larger,  and  the  postero-internal 
liuttress  of  the  crown  is  obsolete.  In  the  third  premolar  (Fig.  3)  the  j^jste- 
rior  lobe  is  still  more  reduced  in  size,  the  anterior  lobe  is  proportionately 
enlarged,  and  the  inner  buttresses  of  the  crown  are  obsolete. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimens  are  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  second  uppci' luolar,  estimated   17 

Transverse  diameter  of  second  upper  molar IS 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  last  upper  premolar !»A 

Transverse  diameter  of  last  upper  premolar ■ 1'2 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  second  lower  molar 10 

Transverse  diameter  of  second  lower  molar 10 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  fourth  lowei'  premolar ". 9i 

Trauisverse  diameter  of  fourtli  lower  premolar (>i 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  third  lower  premolar .....  S| 

Transverse  diameter  of  third  lower  premolar. ; ~> 

Shortly  after  the  original  description  of  the  above  specimens,  several  others 


30 

were  received  from  Professor  Hayden,  obtained  on  Henry's  Fork  of  Green 
River,  Wyoming,  wliioli  are  referred  to  in  the  last  paragraph  of  the  same 
article  of  the  Proceedings  above  mentioned  as  the  former  ones.  The  addi- 
tional specimens  consist  of  several  small  jaw-fragments,  with  teeth,  belonging 
to  an  individual  past  maturity,  as  indicated  by  the  worn  condition  of  the 
latter. 

One  of  the  specimens,  a  much-worn  last  upper  premolar,  is  represented 
in  Fig.  4,  Plate  V.  It  agrees  with  the  corresjjonding  tooth  above  descrilied 
l)()th  in  form  and  proportions.  The  summits  of  the  three  lobes  of  the  crown 
arc  worn  down  so  as  to  expose  large  tracts  of  dentine. 

A  second  specimen  consists  of  an  upper-jaw  fragment  retaining  a  portion 
of  tlie  first  molar  and  the  complete  second  one.  The  former  was  so  much 
worn  as  to  have  a  great  part  of  the  enameled  triturating  surface  removed. 
The  sccon'd  mohu.-,  represented  in  Figs.  8,  9,  Plate  V,  has  a  low  trapezoidal 
crown  composed  of  four  lobes,  of  which  the  anterior  two  agree  in  constitu- 
tion and  proportions  with  the  fragment  of  the  corresponding  tooth  above 
described.  The  outer  pair  of  lobes  are  crescentoid  pyramidal  and  bounded 
externally  by  strong  convex  buttresses.  The  inner  lobes,  of  which  the  an- 
terior is  much  the  larger,  form  broad  cones.  A  strong  basal  ridge  bounds 
tlie  crown  in  front.  The  enamel  is  worn  smooth  and  is  abraded  from  the 
summits  of  the  outer  lobes  so  as  to  expose  broad  dentinal  tracts.  The  fore 
and  att  diameter  of  the  crown  of  the  second  upper  molar  is  16^  lines;  its 
transverse  diameter  is  18  lines.  The  remaining  specimen  consists  of  an 
upper-jaw  fragment  containing  the  last  molar,  represented  in  Figs.  6,  7, 
Plate  V  The  tooth  is  fractured  and  its  parts  somewhat  dislocated,  so  as  to 
extend  its  breadth.  It  has  the  same  constitution  as  the  former  tooth,  except 
that  it  has  ])ut  a  single  internal  lobe,  which  in  great  part  is  broken  away  in 
flic  specimen. 

Many  more  complete  specimens  referable  to  Palceosyops  paludosus  have 
been  received  from  Drs.  Carter  and  Carson.  One  of  the  most  important  of 
these  consists  of  the  facial  portion  of  a  skull  containing  nearly  all  the  molars 
and  the  canines  of  both  sides.  The  specimen  submitted  to  my  examination 
bj  D.r.  Carter,  represented  in  Fig.  51,  Plate  XVIII,  was  discovered  in  a 
greenish  frialde  sandstone  of  the  Grizzly  Buttes.  The  tixce  is  entirely  broken 
away  at  its  upper  part  and  fore  extremity.  The  molar  teeth,  of  which  a  full 
scries  is  represented  in  Figs.  3,  4,  Plate  IV,  are  fijr  the   most  part  preserved 


31 

entire,  but  the  canines,  of  which  one  is  represented  in  Figs.  2,  3,  arc  broken 
off  at  the  crown.  Tlie  specimen  pertained  to  an  individual  past  maturity,  as 
indicated  by  the  worn  condition  of  the  teeth.  Tiie  enamel  is  ai)radcd  from 
the  summits  of  the  outer  lobes  of  the  last  premolar  and  the  molars  and  the 
summits  of  the  inner  lobes  of  the  first  molar,  so  as  to  expose  tracts  of  den- 
tine. Elsewhere  the  enamel  is  worn  smooth,  but  remains  of  its  original 
rugose  condition  are  yet  visible  in  the  last  molar.  In  anatomical  character 
and  proportions  the  teeth  agree  in  all  respects  with  those  corresponding 
among  the  specimens  above  described. 

The  molar  series  consists  of  seven  teeth  which  successively  increase  in 
size  from  first  to  last.  The  molars  or  true  molars  approach  in  character  those 
of  Titanotherium,  and  in  a  less  degree  those  of  Anoplotherium  and  Chalico- 
therium.  The  crown  is  broad  and  low  and  rather  rhombic  in  outline.  It  is 
composed  of  four  principal  lobes  expanding  in  a  common  base.  The  outer 
lobes  are  the  larger  and  have  the  shape  so  common  in  many  allied  animals  as 
Palisotherium,  Ancliitherium,  Anoplotherium,  Oreodon,  Cervus,  &c.  They 
are  three-sided  pyramids  with  crescentoid  summits,  the  anterior  extensions  of 
wliich  form  stout  external  buttresses  to  the  crown.  The  inner  lobes  are 
broad  cones  less  prominent  than  the  outer  lobes.  Tlic  anterior  is  the  larger, 
and  is  situated  opposite  the  angular  recess  of  the  outer  lobes;  the  posterior 
occupies  a  position  opposite  the  postero-internal  face  of  the  contiguous  outer 
lobe  at  the  inner  back  corner  of  the  crown. 

A  strong  basal  ridge  occupies  the  fore  part  of  the  crown,  and  elements  of 
the  same  are  found  at  the  bottom  of  the  outer  faces  of  the  external  lobes.  A 
tubercle  exists  in  the  angular  interval  of  the  anterior  lol)es  and  the  basal 
ridge  in  front,  which  looks  as  if  it  were  the  rudiment  of  the  large  antero-in- 
ternal  lobe  in  Anoplotherium  and  its  homologue  in  ordinary  ruminants. 

In  the  last  molar  the  postero-internal  Ipbe,  as  existing  in  the  molars  in  ad- 
vance, is  absent  or  is  substituted  by  a  small  tubercle  extending  outwardly  as  a 
posterior  basal  ridge  to  the  crown. 

In  the  unworn  condition  of  the  upper  molars  of  PalfEosyops  the  external 
lobes  of  the  crown  have  acute  crescentoid  summits  which  conjoin  on  the  sum- 
mit of  the  median  outer  buttress.  As  the  teeth  were  worn  away  in  mastica- 
tion, a  W-shaped  tract  of  dentine  appeared  on  the  outer  lobes,  and  this  gradu- 
ally widened  with  the  progress  of  abrasion.  As  the  summits  of  the  inner 
lobes  were  worn    away,  circular  islets  of  dentine  made  their  appearance, 


32 

which  likewise  gradually  expanded  as  a  result  of  mastication.  A  continuance 
of  the  process  would  unite  the  inner  and  outer  tracts,  and  in  an  advanced 
condition  of  abrasion  the  distinction  of  the  four  lobes  with  the  intervening 
valleys  would  be  obliterated,  leaving  a  broad  concave  dentinal  surface  bordered 
by  the  enamel  at  the  sides  of  the  crown. 

The  upper  molars  of  Pateosyops,  while  presenting  considerable  resemblance 
to  those  of  Pateotherium,  also  exhibit  well-marked  differences.  They  differ 
especially  in  the  greater  prominence  and  more  robust  character  of  the  ex- 
ternal Ijuttresses  of  the  outer  lol^es,  in  the  form  and  more  complete  isolation 
of  the  inner  lobes,  and  in  the  absence  of  the  deep  pit  at  the  termination  of 
the  oblique  valley  of  the  crown. 

In  comparison  with  the  upper  molars  of  Anoplotherium,  those  of  Palfeo- 
syops  especially  differ  in  having  proportionately  stouter  buttresses  to  the 
crown  externally;  in  possessing  but  a  rudiment  of  the  antero-internal  lobe  as 
existing  in  the  former,  and  in  the  different  shape  and  relationship  of  position 
of  the  postero-internal  lobe,  whicli  in  Anoplotherium  has  the  form  nearly  of 
the  contiguous  outer  lobe  and  embraces  it  as  in  the  deer. 

In  comparison  with  the  corresponding  teeth  of  Chalicotherium,  several  ini- 
poi'tant  differences  are  observable.  Of  the  outer  buttresses  of  the  crown  in 
this  genus,  the  posterior  is  the  larger,  but  in  Pateosyops  the  anterior  is  the 
larger.  The  antero-internal  lobe  is  proportionately  less  prominent,  and  the 
postero-internal  lube  has  a  different  shape,  being  nearly  like  that  in  front  of 
it,  and  it  is  completely  isolated.  In  Chalicotherium  it  is  more  like  that  in 
Anoplotherium,  and  it  joins  the  fore  part  of  the  postero-external  lobe.  In 
flic  last  molar  of  Palseosyops  the  postero-internal  lobe  is  obsolete,  but  in 
Chalicotherium  is  proportionately  as  well  developed  as  in  the  other  molars. 

As  previously  intimated,  it  is  to  the  upper  molars  of  Titanotherium  that 
lliose  of  Pateosyops  have  most  resejnblance.  The  abrupt  and  deep  pit  near 
the  centre  of  the  crown  is  absent.  The  rudimental  lobe  at  the  fore  part  of 
the  crown  between  the  anterior  principal  lobes  is  proportionately  less  de- 
veloped, and  yet  is  more  isolated  from  the  basal  ridge.  In  the  last  molar  the 
postero-internal  lobe  is  nearly  suppressed,  while  in  Titanotherium  it  is  still  a 
conspicuous  clement  of  the  crown,  though  less  well  developed  than  in  (he 
other  molars. 

The  premolars  of  PaliEos3'op.s  undergo  a  successive  reduction  forward  and 
assume  a  more  and  more  elemental  condition. 


Tlio  (burili  prciiiular  lias  uii  (iljloiiir  stjuiiro  crown  uilh  (lie,  IraaHverse 
diameter  exceeding  that  fore  and  aft,  and  witli  the  inner  part  nearly  semi- 
circular. The  crown  is  composed  of  three  lobes,  corresponding  with  the 
outer  pair  of  the  molars,  and  apparently  the  large  inner  one  situated  opposite 
the  recess  of  the  former.  The  outer  lobes  are  like  those  of  the  molars,  with 
the  back  one  proportionately  less  well  developed,  with  the  outer  median  but- 
tress of  the  crown  suppressed,  and  with  the  outer  median  fold  of  the  antero- 
external  loI)e  more  prominent.  The  inner  lobe  is  a  single,  broad,  undivided 
cone  less  prominent  but  rather  larger  than  the  outer  ones.  It  appears  to  be 
homologous  alone  with  the  anterior  of  the  inner  cones  of  the  molars,  and  at 
least  does  not  appear  to  be  a  connate  pair  as  in  the  corresponding  tooth  of 
Titanotlierium.  The  conspicuous  pit  in  the  center  of  the  crown  in  this 
genus  is  absent  in  Palseosyops.  A  thin  basal  ridge  starting  in  front  and  back 
of  the  internal  lobe  festoons  the  crown  outwardly  and  at  the  bottom  externally 
of  the  outer  lobes. 

The  third  premolar  is  a  diminished  representative  of  the  one  behind,  but 
has  its  antero-external  lobe  proportionately  a  little  larger,  and  the  [)ostcro- 
external  lobe  proportionately  reduced.  The  teeth  of  the  two  sides  are  not 
symmetrical  in  the  specimen.  That  opposite  to  the  one  represented  in  the 
figure  has  its  fore  part  broken  away,  but  the  postero-external  lobe  is  consider- 
ably longer  than  in  the  entire  tooth. 

The  second  premolar  has  a  trihedral  crown,  in  which  but  two  lobes  are 
conspicuous.  In  comparison  with  the  premolars  behind,  the  internal  loi^e  is 
greatly  reduced  in  size,  and  the  antero-external  lobe  is  much  enlarged  so  as  to 
become  the  main  portion  of  the  crown,  while  the  postero-external  lobe  is  ob- 
solete. 

The  first  premolar  is  a  small  tooth  separated  from  the  others  by  a  slight 
interval.  It  has  a  simple  short  conical  crown  with  the  base  slightly  extended 
backward,  and  is  inserted  by  a  pair  of  fangs.  The  other  premolars  and  the 
molars  are  inserted  with  three  fangs,  of  which  the  inner  one  in  the  latter 
teeth  consists  of  a  connate  pair. 

The  canine  teeth  of  Palasosyops  were  powertul  and  efticient  weapons,  and 
resembled  those  of  ordinary  carnivores  more  than  they  do  those  of  nearly 
allied  living  animals.  Though  imperfect  in  the  specimen  under  consideration, 
the  remaining  portions,  as  represented  in  Figs.  2,  3,  Plate  IV,  indicate  teeth 
of  the  form  and  proportions  of  those  of  living  bears.  They  also  ajipear  to 
have  nearly  the  same  relative  i)osition  with   the   other  teeth   and   the  same 


•34 

direction  ;i.s  in  Uil^  latlcr.  Tlie  fang  is  robust  and  gibbous,  and  comes  from 
the  alveolus  in  a  direction  downward  and  forward  with  a  greater  degree  of 
divergence  than  usual  among  carnivora.  The  face  of  Palseosyops,  judging 
from  the  imperfect  specimen,  a  side-view  of  which  is  given  in  Fig.  51,  Plate 
XVIII,  in  its  complete  condition,  would  appear  to  resemble  in  shape  that  of 
tiie  Elotherinm  of  White  River,  Dakota,  cxcejit  that  the  muzzle  was  pro- 
■  portionately  shorter.  Among  living  animals,  it  appears  to  have  resembled 
that  of  the  bears  niort;  than  in  those  nearly  related  to  it.  The  zygomatic 
arches  are  of  rol)ust  proportions  and  widely  divergent  at  their  anterior  attach- 
ment to  the  face.  The  malar  portion  of  the  zygoma  is  divided  by  an  acute 
ridge  curving  from  the  anterior  orbital  margin  outward,  downward,  and  back- 
ward. The  surface  above  this  ridge  curves  outwardly  and  downward  from 
the  floor  of  the  orbit  continuously.  The  surface  beneath  is  a  broad  trilateral 
plane  looking  forward,  downward,  and  outward,  and  is  roughened  for  the  at- 
tachment of  a  powerful  masseter  muscle.  The  space  behind  the  anterior 
abutment  of  the  zygoma  indicates  a  temporal  fossa  of  large  capacity. 

The  orbit  appears  low,  and  is  directed  obliquely  forward  and  outward. 
In  advance  of  the  prominent  antorbital  margin  the  side  of  the  face  is  nearly 
vertical.  The  infra-orbital  foramen  is  rather  large,  and  is  situated  over  the 
position  of  the  last  premolar.  In  front  of  the  foramen  begins  the  swell  of  the 
large  canine  alveolus,  and  below  its  position  is  the  alveolar  border,  marked  by 
the  vertical  ridges  of  the  molar  fangs.  The  hard  palate  is  well  arched,  and 
nearly  parallel  at  the  sides.  Its  surface  in  the  specimen  is  obscured  by  the 
attachment  of  rocky  matrix.  The  breadth  of  the  face  at  the  zygomata 
appears  to  have  al^out  equaled  the  length. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows: 

Inches.  Liu6s. 

Breadth  of  face  at  zygomata  ou  liue  with  middle  of  hxat  molar.s 7  8 

Breadtli  of  face  outside  of  last  molars i  C 

Breadth  of  face  outside  of  canine  alveoli 3  G 

Breadth  of  face  at  infraorbital  foramina  3  2 

Breadth  of  bard  palate  between  last  molars    1  7 

Breadth  of  hard  palate  between  last  premolars 1  o 

Distance  from  back  of  last  molar  to  fore  part  of  canine 0  S 

For  comparison,  the  measurements  of  the  teeth  will  be  given  after  the 
description  of  the  following  series. 

Some  additional  specimens,  which  I  suppose  to  belong  to  Palaosyops 
paludosus.,  notwithstanding  certain  dilferences  hereafter  to  be  mentioned,  con- 


35 

sist  of  most  ot"  the  upper  teeth,  with  small  attached  jaw-fragments,  obtained 
l)y  Dr.  Carter  on  Henry's  Fork  of  Green  River.  Of  these  specimens  a  com- 
])lctc  series  of  nearly  perfect  molar  teeth  is  represented  in  Figs.  5,  G,  Plate 
IV.  The  teeth  in  their  abraded  condition  ilidicate  an  older  animal  than  that 
to  which  the  facial  specimen  above  described  belonged.  The  summits  of  the 
constituent  lobes  of  the  teeth  are  nearly  all  worn  to  such  a  degree  as  to 
exhibit  tracts  of  dentine,  and  the  enamel  is  everywhere  smooth,  except  on 
the  external  faces  of  the  outer  lobes  near  the  basal  ridge. 

The  molars  are  almost  identical  in  character  with  those  above  described 
ill  the  facial  specimen.  Trifling  differences  consist  in  the  less  production  of 
the  median  fold  on  the  outer  face  of  the  external  lobes,  and  perhaps  the  less 
degree  of  prominence  of  the  tubercle  in  the  interval  anteriorly  of  the  anterior 
pair  of  lobes.  The  last  premolar  is  likewise  identical  with  those  above 
described,  except  that  its  crown  is  rather  more  square,  or  is  not  quite  so 
wide.  The  anterior  three  premolars  depart  considerably  from  their  character 
in  the  facial  specimen,  and  their  differences  may  probably  indicate  a  different 
species.  The  third  premolar  is  a  diminished  representative  of  the  one  behind 
it,  the  three  lobes  of  the  crown  holding  nearly  the  same  proportionate  devel- 
opment; whereas  in  the  corresponding  tooth  of  the  facial  specimen  the  pos- 
tero-external  lobe  is  considerably  reduced  in  its  proportions.  In  the  second 
])remolar  the  crown  still  retains  a  postero-external  lobe  reduced  in  proportion 
to  the  others,  but  in  the  corresponding  tooth  alaove  described  it  is  obsolete. 
The  retention  of  this  lobe  gives  the  crown  a  greater  fore  and  aft  breadth  than 
that  contained  in  the  facial  specimen.  The  first  premolar  has  the  same  form 
as  that  of  the  latter,  but  it  is  much  lai'ger. 

The  mutilated  canine,  accompanying  the  molars  first  described,  is  repre- 
sented iu  Fig.  1,  Plate  IV,  and  is  but  little  more  than  half  the  size  of  those 
contained  in  the  facial  specimen. 

An  isolated  incisor,  represented  in  Fig.  8,  accompanying  the  molars  and 
canine  just  described,  is  regarded  as  an  upper  one.  Tiie  crown  is  mutilated, 
l)ut  when  complete  appears  to  have  had  a  short,  conical  crown,  bounded 
behind  by  a  strong  basal  ridge.  The  fang  is  laterally  compressed,  and  is 
about  an  inch  in  length. 

Comparative  measurements  of  the  series  of  teeth  of  the  two  individuals  of 
Palseosyops.  indicated  by  the  facial  specimen,  with  teeth,  from  Grizzly  Buttes, 


36 


and    the    specimens   of   (eetli    IVoiu    Henry's   Fork,   just   described,   are   as 
follows : 


Si)ace  occupied  by  the  entire  molar  series 
Space  occupied  by  the  true  molar  series  . 
Space  occupied  by  the  premolar  series  . . 


Liucs. 


G9 
41 

28 


Lines. 


71 
■11 
32 


Diameter  of  lirst  premolar  . 
Diameter  of  secoud  premolar 
Diameter  of  third  premolar 
Diameter  of  fourth  premolar 

Diameter  of  first  molar 

Diameter  of  secoud  molar . . 
Diameter  of  last  molar 


Autero- 
jiosterior. 


Lines. 

5 

G 

7 
10 
12 
1(3 
17 


Transverse. 


Lines. 

3 

7 

8 
lOi 
13 
17 

m 


Antero- 
posterior. 


Lines. 

7 

8 

8 

8 
12 
15 
17 


Transverse. 


Lines. 

4 

7 

9 
10 
12i 
W 
IGJ 


Lines. 


Lines. 


Length  of  faug  of  upper  canines 

Autero-posterior  diameter  of  canines 
Transverse  diameter  of  canines 


28 
12§ 

m 


18 

7 


The  question  arises  whether  the  differences  which  have  been  indicated  in 
the  [)remolars  and  canines  of  the  two  different  series  of  teeth  above  described 
indicate  more  than  one  species.  The  differences  are  clearly  in  degree  of 
development  and  size,  and  these  may  probably  be  of  a  sexual  character.  The 
individual  with  the  more  powerful  canines  I  suppose  to  have  been  a  male,  in 
which,  with  a  greater  proportionate  degree  of  development  of  these  oi'gans 
than  in  the  female,  there  appears  to  have  been  a  reduction  in  the  degree  of 
development  of  the  anterior  premolars. 

Another  sjieciinen  submitted  to  my  examination  by  Dr.  Carter,  and  repre- 
sented in  Figs.  6,  7,  Plate  XXIV,  belonged  to  an  older  animal  than  the 
former,  as  indicated  by  the  more  worn  condition  of  the  teeth.  The  latter 
consist  of  the  anterior  three  premolars  and  a  portion  of  the  fang  of  the  canine, 
and  they  have  the  same  form  and  proportions  as  the  corresponding  teeth 
above  described.     The  first  premolar  is  close  to  the  others,  or  is  iiot  sepa- 


37 

rated  l)y  a  coiispiouoiis  interval  as  in  (he  Ibrmer  s[)ccini(ni.  Tlie  lolx's  ol'  llic 
second  anil  third  premolars  are  worn  nearly  to  a  level  with  tlieir  l)ase.  Tin; 
outer  surtiice  of  the  maxillary,  as  seen  in  Fig.  G,  is  defined  by  an  oijliijiir 
ridge  at  the  nasal  border,  within  which  the  suture  of  the  premaxillaiy  ])ur- 
sues  its  course  over  the  position  of  the  fang  of  the  canine.  Just  outside  of 
the  nasal  border  the  surface  of  the  maxillary  is  depressed. 
The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Space  occupied  by  tlie  anterior  tln-ee  premolars 21 

Autero-posterior  diameter  of  first  premolar G^ 

Transverse  diameter  of  first  premolar 3;^ 

Autero-posterior  diameter  of  second  premolar 7 

Transverse  diameter  of  second  premolar G^ 

Autero-posterior  diameter  of  third  premolar 8 

Transverse  diameter  of  third  premolar 9 

Diameter  of  fang  of  canine 8 

Fragments  of  half  a  dozen  lower  jaws  referable  to  Palseosyops,  collected  in 
various  localities  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger  by  Drs.  Carter  and  Corson, 
have  been  submitted  to  my  examination. 

A  well-preserved  specimen,  consisting  of  the  greater  part  of  the  jaw,  was 
discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  imbedded  in  a  greenish  gravel  thirteen  miles  soutii- 
east  of  Fort  Bridger.  The  right  ramus  is  represented  in  Fig.  11,  Plate  V,  and 
it  contains  the  molars  and  the  back  two  premolars,  which  are  also  repre- 
senteil  with  a  view  of  the  triturating  surfaces  in  Fig.  10  of  the  same  plate. 
The  teeth,  corresponding  with  those  in  part  upon  which  the  species  Palceo- 
syops paludosus  was  originally  indicated,  are  identical  in  anatomical  chaiacter 
and  so  nearly  in  size  that  the  jaw  may  be  regarded  as  pertaining  to  the  sam(> 
species. 

In  advance  of  the  teeth  retained  in  the  jaw  there  are  indications  of  two 
additional  jM-emolars  verging  close  upon  the  remains  of  the  canine  alveolus, 
and  thus  the  specimen  shows  that  the  number  of  the  lower  molar  series  of 
Palseosyops  is  seven. 

The  lower  molars  of  Palaeosyops  resemble  those  of  Palseotherium  and 
Anchitherium,  but  even  more  closely  those  of  Titanotherium.  The  crowns 
arc  ])roportionately  wider  and  lower,  or  appear  more  robust  than  in  the  formei- 
genera. 

The  crown  of  the  anterior  two  molars  is  quadrately  oblong  oval,  with  the 
fore  and  aft  diameter  largest  and  the  depth  less  than  the  width.  It  is  com- 
posed of  two  divisions  or  lobes,  one  in  advance  of  the  other.     The  last  molar 


38 

has  llie  same  form  and  coiistriictioa,  with  the  addition  of  a  third  but  smaller 
lobe. 

In  tlie  ninvorn  molars  the  principal  constituent  lobes  present  acnte  cres- 
centoid  summits  embracing  a  concavity  which  opens  to  its  bottom  by  an 
angular  notch  on  the  inner  side  of  the  crown.  The  contiguous  arms  of  the 
crescentoid  summits  conjoin  in  a  strong  conical  eminence  situated  just  in 
advance  of  the  middle  of  the  crown  internally.  The  point  of  this  eminence 
is  simple  or  undivided ;  in  Anchitherium  it  is  deeply  indented  and  appears  to 
he  composed  of  a  connate  pair  of  eminences. 

The  fore  part  of  the  summit  of  the  anterior  lobe  in  Palgeosj'ops  curves 
downward  and  inward,  and  ends  in  a  slight  prominence  at  the  anterior  inner 
corner  of  the  crown.  The  hind  part  of  the  summit  of  the  posterior  lobe  ends 
in  a  prominence  like  that  in  advance,  but  smaller,  and  situated  at  the  postero- 
internal corner  of  the  crown. 

Externally  the  lobes  of  the  crown  are  angularly  convex,  and  include  deep 
angular  recesses  sloping  outwardly  and  downward,  and  bounded  by  festooned 
elements  of  a  basal  ridge.  The  inner  surface  of  the  crown  is  nearly  vertical, 
smooth,  and  without  a  basal  ridge.  The  latter  is  especially  well  developed 
at  tlie  fore  and  back  part  of  the  crown,  except  in  the  last  molar,  in  which  the 
additional  lobe  takes  its  place.  This  lobe  is  a  much  reduced  likeness  of  those 
in  advance,  with  the  arms  of  its  crescentoid  summit  contracted  and  conjoined 
with  the  posterior  conical  eminence  of  the  crown  internally. 

The  molars  undergo  a  rapid  reduction  forward,  and  they  are  inserted  by 
two  fangs.  The  crown  of  the  last  premolar  is  a  reduced  representative  of 
that  of  the  succeeding  molar,  with  the  posterior  lobe  proportionately,  in 
comparison  with  the  anterior  lobe,  less  well  developed.  In  the  crown  of  the 
third  premolar  there  has  been  a  further  proportionate  reduction  in  the  back 
lobe,  but  the  anterior  remains  nearly  the  same,  except  that  it  appears  more 
robust  from  its  connation  with  the  homologue  of  the  anterior  of  the  inner 
conical  eminences  of  the  teeth  behind. 

In  Pateotherium  and  Anchitherium  the  corresponding  premolars  with  those 
described  repeat  the  form  of  those  of  the  molars,  and  in  this  respect  greatly 
differ  from  Palseosyops.  The  inferior  premolars  of  Titanotherium  in  a  perfect 
condition  are  not  sufficiently  well  known  to  instittvte  a  comparison  with  those 
of  Palseosyops. 

The   lower   molars  of  Palseosyops    in   wearing  would  assume  the  same 


39 


apjiearance  as  those  of  Palaeotheriuin  and  Anchitheriiiin  at  the  same  stages  <>( 
attrition. 

Tlie  space  occupied  1)}'  the  entire  molar  series  is  estimated  at  al»oiit  G.^ 
inches,  of  whicli  the  true  molars  occupy  ratlier  less  tlian  4  inches. 

The  measurements  of  the  molar  teeth  contained  in  the  lower  jaw  are  as 
follows : 


Antero- 
posterior. 


Transverse. 


Diameter  of  tbird  premolar  . 
Diameter  of  fourth  premolar 

Diameter  of  first  molar 

Diameter  of  second  molar. . . 
Diameter  of  last  molar 


Lines. 
8i 
9 

15 
19 


Lines. 

8 
10 


The  premolars  are  inserted  by  a  pair  of  fangs,  except  the  first,  whicli  has 
but  a  single  fang. 

The  lower  jaw  of  Palceosyops,  as  seen  in  Fig.  11,  Plate  V,  appro.ximates  in 
form  that  of  the  tapir  and  hog,  though  presenting  important  differences. 
The  dentary  portion  of  the  ramus  is  proportionately  shorter  and  deeper  than 
in  either  of  those  animals,  and  the  alveolar  border  is  more  ascending  poste- 
riorly. The  base  is  more  convex  fore  and  aft  than  in  the  hog  but  less  than 
in  tiie  tapii',  and  is  more  obtuse  than  in  either.  The  outer  surface  is  vertical, 
with  a  slight  outward  slope  at  the  fore  part. 

The  back  part  of  the  jaw  is  of  more  uniform  breadth  than  in  the  tapir,  and 
is  more  like  that  in  the  hog.  Toward  the  angle  the  outer  surface  is  a  verti- 
cal plane,  with  the  lower  border  or  base  more  directed  downwardly  timn  in 
the  hog.  The  upper  or  ascending  portion  presents  a  masseteric  fossa  about 
as  deep  as  in  the  tapir  but  of  considerably  greater  width. 

The  condyle  is  large  and  thick,  and  much  like  that  in  the  tapir,  but  is  less 
inclined  inwardly.  It  has  about  the  same  proportionate  elevation  above  the 
level  of  the  base  of  the  jaw,  but  less  above  the  level  of  the  teeth. 

The  border  of  the  jaw  below  the  condyle  behind  is  at  first  slightly  concave 
and  then  convex,  as  in  the  hog,  but  to  a  less  degree.  The  coronoid  process 
is  about  as  long  as  that  of  the  tapir,  but  the  fore  part  curves  upward  and 
l)ack\vard  without  any  inclination  forward.  The  notch  behind  hardly  descends 
below  the  level  of  the  condyle. 


40 

The  mental  turiiincii  is  siiiallcr  tliaii  in  (ho  tapir,  and  is  .situated  l)el()\v  the 
interval  of  the  second  and  third  picniolars 

The  length  of  the  lower  jaw,  fi-om  its  back  border  to  the  fore  part  of  the 
second  premolar,  is  [)'\  inches,  and  in  the  complete  condition  it  measured 
about  2  inches  more. 

Portions  of  several  lower  jaws,  apparently  all  referable  to  Palseosyops,  were 
ol)tained  by  Dr.  Corson  at  Grizzly  Buttes.  The  specimens  exhibit  some 
variation  in  character,  and  may,  perhaps,  belong  to  more  than  one  species  of 
the  genus.  One  of  the  specimens  consists  of  a  dentary  fragment  containing 
(he  true  molars  and  the  fangs  of  the  two  premolars  in  advance.  The  retained 
teeth  are  like  those  previously  described,  but  are  in  a  trifling  degree  smaller. 
The  series  measures  3|  inches.  The  jaw-fragment  nearly  agrees  with  the 
corresponding  portion  of  the  specimen  above  described,  but  is  of  more  uniform 
depth. 

Another  specimen  consists  of  a  right  ramus,  without  the  chin  and  back 
part,  and  broken  into  three  pieces.  It  contains  the  fang  of  the  canine  and 
most  of  those  of  the  molars.  The  jaw  is  of  more  uniform  depth  below  the 
position  of  the  teeth  than  in  the  more  complete  specimen  first  described,  and 
more  robust  than  in  cither  of  the  former  specimens.  The  retained  portion 
of  the  fang  of  the  canine  indicates  a  larger  tooth  than  existed  in  the  first- 
described  specimen — one,  also,  that  would  accord  in  its  robust  character  with 
those  of  the  facial  specimen  referred  to  Palceosijops  iJcdudosus.  The  presence 
of  the  fang  of  the  canine  produces  a  strong  bulge  at  the  side  of  the  chin, 
which  apj/cars  to  have  been  comparatively  feeble  in  the  first-described  speci- 
men. Two  mental  foramina  are  situated  below  the  position  of  the  second 
and  third  premolars.  The  first  premolar  appears  to  have  had  a  single  fang 
consisting  of  a  connate  pair.  It  was  separated  from  the  canine  and  second 
premolar  by  conspicuous  intervals,  the  posterior  of  which  is  the  larger.  A 
])ortion  of  the  chin  being  retained  in  the  specimen,  it  would  a})pear  in  the 
entire  condition  to  form  a  broad  slope  defined  at  the  sides  liy  the  convexities 
of  the  canine  alveoli.  The  rami  were  completely  co-ossified  at  the  symphysis 
witiiout  the  suture  of  union  being  apparent. 

The  remaining  specimen  consists  of  a  portion  of  the  jaw  containing  the 
limgs  of  the  last  two  molars,  and  the  portion  immediately  jjehind  extending 
toward  the  angle.  The  dentary  portion  of  the  bone  is  considerably  deeper 
(hau   ill   (he  corresponding  portion  of  Ihe   preceding  specimens.     The  l)ase 


41 


below  Uie  posilum  (if  llic  last  nioliir  lootli  is  rafhcr  more  eonspiciKiusly  lulicr- 
ous  and  roughened  for  muscular  attachment,  and  the  concavity  back  of  this 
is  more  posterior  and  deeper  than  in  the  first-described  specimen. 

Comparative  measurements  of  the  lower-jaw  specimens,  including  the  one 
first  described,  are  as  follows  : 


Space  occupied  by  tlie  entire  molar  series 

Space  occupied  by  the  molars  and  last  two  premolars  . 

Space  occupied  by  the  true  molars 

Distance  from  last  molar  to  back  of  jaw 

Width  of  ramus  back  of  condyle 

Depth  of  ramus  at  middle  of  last  molar : . . 

Depth  of  ramus  below  last  premolar 

Thickness  of  base  below  second  molar 

Anteroposterior  diameter  of  last  molar 


No.  1. 


Lines. 


C4 
.40 
49 
44 
31 
23 
13 
19 


No.  2. 


Lines. 


05 
48 
48 
41 
3U 
23 
11 
20 


No.  3. 


Lines. 


00 
4.5 


33 
20 

12 
19 


No.  4. 


Lines. 
78 

02 
45 


33 
29 
13 
19 


A  small  fragment  of  the  chin  of  a  lower  jaw,  referable  to  Paleeo.syops, 
retains  part  of  the  alveolus  of  a  large  canine,  and  portions  of  the  fangs  of 
three  incisors  of  the  same  side,  thus  indicating  the  number  of  the  latter  teeth 
in  the  animal.  The  canine  alveolus  has  been  about  an  inch  in  diameter.  In 
the  ramus  of  the  jaw  above  described,  retaining  the  fang  of  a  canine,  this 
tooth  has  been  nearly  in  proportionate  size  to  that  of  the  alveolus  just  men- 
tioned. 

Small  fragments  from  three  different  skulls,  attributable  to  Palceosyops, 
consisting  of  portions  of  two  sagittal  crests  and  the  supra-occipital,  indicate 
capacious  temporal  fossa?,  separated  by  a  short,  thick  crest  and  a  broad 
occiput. 

The  fragments  of  sagittal  crests  arc  from  the  fore  part,  retaining  the  suture 
and  notch  for  the  summit  of  the  frontal.  The  upper  surface  of  the  crest  is  a 
flat  triangle,  slightly  depressed  at  the  middle,  with  the  notch  for  the  frontal 
in  its  base.  In  the  latter  position  it  is  li  inches  wide;  and  a  couple  of  inches 
back  of  this  position  the  crest  is  !|  of  an  inch  thick. 

The  occipii'il  fragment  on  each  side  in  front  presents  a  widc!,  sloping  sur- 
face, which  contributes  to  the  temporal  fos.sa.  The  posterior  surface  in 
general  ap])earance  resemljles  that  in  the  rhinoceros.  Tiie  upjier  ])ortion 
forms  a  broad,  even  concavity,  undivided  by  any  trace  of  a  vertical  ridge,  and 
6  G 


42 

only  loiigliened  at  tlic  siiinmit  for  the  attachment  of  the  nuchal  ligament. 
The  lateral  processes  are  angular  and  ilivei-gent,  and  the  space  between  them 
is  4^  inches  in  width.  The  lower  portion  of  the  occipital  surface  approaching 
the  occipital  foramen  is  convex.  The  height  of  the  occiput  fi-om  the  latter  is 
about  4f  inches. 

A  lumbar  vertebra  was  found  by  Dr.  Corson  at  Grrizzly  Buttes.  It  pre- 
sents the  ordinary  ungulate  form.  The  body  is  2  inches  long,  but  some- 
what shortened  below.  It  is  concave  fore  and  aft,  at  the  sides,  and  beneath, 
where  it  is  also  slightly  carinate.  The  anterior  extremity  is  slightly  convex, 
li  inches  transversely,  and  a  little  less  in  depth  to  the  prominence  beneath. 
The  posterior  surface  is  .flat,  or  feebly  depressed.  The  transverse  process 
springs  from  the  upper  level  of  the  l)ody.  A  well-developed  metapophysis 
])rojects  from  the  position  of  the  anterior  zygapophysis.  The  diameter  of  the 
spinal  canal  is  about  an  inch. 

Besides  the  skull-fragments  and  vertebra  of  Palasosyops,  a  number  of 
isolated  carpal  and  tarsal  bones,  and  many  fragments  of  the  long  bones  and 
other  portions  of  the  skeleton  have  been  collected  by  Dr.  Carter,  Dr.  Corson, 
and  Professor  Hayden's  party.  Many  of  the  bones  had  been  fractured,  or 
more  or  less  crushed,  while  they  lay  in  their  bed,  and  many  have  been  further 
injured  after  exposure  through  the  influence  of  the  weather  and  other  causes. 
The  bones  nearly  resemble  in  size  and  construction  the  corresponding  ones 
of  the  American  tapir. 

The  distal  extremity  of  a  humerus,  represented  in  Fig.  3,  Plate  XIX,  was 
found  by  Dr.  Corson  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger.  The  breadth  of  the 
specimen  between  the  supra-condyloid  eminences  is  3^  inches.  A  deep 
sujDra-condj'loid  fossa  occupies  the  front  of  the  humerus,  opposed  to  the 
deeper  and  more  capacious  olecranon  fossa.  The  articular  trochlea  is  2.] 
inches  wide  in  front,  and  narrows  an  inch  less  behind. 

A  mutilated  femur,  without  the  head  and  trochanters,  represented  in  Fig.  1, 
Plate  XIX,  was  obtained  on  Henry's  Fork,  of  Green  River,  by  Dr.  Carter. 
In  its  complete  condition  it  has  approximated  lo  inches  in  length.  The 
shaft  is  three-sided,  and  at  the  middle  is  IG  lines  in  diameter  from  before 
backward,  and  19  lines  transversely.  The  median  trochanter  projects  from 
the  outer  border  of  the  prismoid  shaft,  and  is  higher  up  in  position  than  in 
the  tapir.  The  distal  extremity  resembles  the  corresponding  part  in  the 
latter,  but  the  trochlea  for  the  patella  is  of  less  breadth. 


43 

Fig.  2,  Plate  XIX,  i-epreseuts  a  inucli  better  preserved  distal  extremity  ol' 
the  femur  than  tiiat  of  the  former.  It  was  obtained  by  Professor  Hayden's 
party  at  Grrizzly  Buttes.  At  the  supra-condyloid  eminences  it  is  o^  inches 
in  diameter.  The  width  at  the  condyles  is  2f  inches.  The  trochlea  for  the 
patella,  where  widest,  measures  16  lines. 

The  detached  head  of  a  femur,  in  perfect  condition,  found  by  Dr.  Carter 
near  Fort  Bridger,  measures  about  2  inches  in  diameter.  A  deep  cup-like 
pit  for  the  round  ligament  approaches  the  center  of  the  head  much  more 
closely  than  in  the  tapii\ 

A  nearly  entire  femur  of  Palseosyops,  received  from  Dr.  Carter  since  the 
above  was  written,  is  represented  in  Fig.  5,  Plate  XXIX.  It  nearly  repeats 
the  form  of  that  of  the  tapir,  but  rather  i-esembles  that  of  the  Indian  tapir, 
or  Baird's  tapii%  of  Gruatemala,  than  that  of  the  American  tapir.  In  compari- 
son with  that  of  the  Taplrus  Bairdi,  it  is  rather  larger,  and  the  upper 
extremity  is  proportionately  somewhat  wider.  The  inner  trochanter  is 
longer  or  more  prominent,  but  the  third  trochanter  is  neither  so  long  nor  so 
hook-like. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Inches. 

Length  externally  from  sumuiit  of  great  trocliauter 15.J 

Width  between  head  and  great  trochanter 4i 

Width  at  third  trochanter 2| 

Uiaiueter  of  head    2i 

u 

Diameter  fore  and  aft  of  shaft  at  middle Ih 

Width  at  condyles 3^ 

Fig.  1,  Plate  XX,  represents  a  nearly  entire  tibia,  obtained  by  Professor 
Hayden's  party  at  Grrizzly  Buttes.  The  upper  condyles  are  in  some  degree 
pressed  toward  each  other,  and  the  extremity  of  the  internal  malleolus  is 
broken  off.  The  bone  is  not  quite  so  long  as  that  of  a  tapir  with  which  it 
was  compared,  but  is  somewhat  stouter.  The  tuberosity  for  the  ligament  of 
the  patella  is  of  more  robust  proportions,  and  extends  lower  on  the  shaft  than 
in  the  tapii-.  The  ridge  descending  from  it  is  thicker  than  in  tlie  latter — 
straighter,  and  is  obtusely  rounded.  The  length  of  the  tibia  is  9  inches ;  the 
breadth  of  its  distal  end  over  2  inches. 

Fig.  2,  Plate  XX,  represents  a  calcaneum,  obtained  l)y  Dr.  Corson  near 
the  stage-route  at  the  crossing  of  Smith's  Fork  of  Green  River.  It  is  nearly 
like  that  of  the  tapir,  but  is  stouter  in  proportion  to  its  length.  The  tuber- 
osity of  the  calcaneum  is  less  comjiressed  and  is  more  obtuse  in  liont.     The 


44 

sustentaculum  is  of  nuicli  greater  extent  vertically,  and  sustains  a  long  ellipti- 
cal facet  for  the  astragalus.  The  anterior  articular  facet  for  the  latter  is  of 
much  less  extent  than  in  the  tapir,  and  is  more  distinctly  separated  from  it 
by  the  interosseous  sinus.  The  articidation  for  the  cuboid  is  of  greater  depth 
but  less  width  than  in  the  tapir. 

The  extreme  length  of  the  calcaneum  is  4^  inches.  The  length  of  the 
tuberosity  is  nearly  3  inches.  The  breadth  of  the  anterior  extremity  of  the 
bone  is  2  J  inches. 

Of  two  additional  calcanea  obtained  by  Dr.  Carter,  one  was  found  on 
Henry's  Fork  of  Grreen  River ;  the  other  near  Millersville. 

Fig.  3,  Plate  XX,  represents  an  astragalus  found  by  Dr.  Carter  at  the 
bluffs,  three  miles  from  Millersville.  The  trochlea  for  the  tibia  is  of  less  ex- 
tent fore  and  aft  than  in  the  tapir ;  and  the  anterior  extremity  of  the  bone  is 
of  less  width  but  greater  depth.  The  length  of  the  astragalus  is  2  inches ; 
the  breadth  of  the  trochlea  twenty  lines ;  the  breadth  of  the  anterior  ex- 
tremity is  the  same,  and  its  thickness  is  an  inch. 

Another  astragalus,  slightly  larger,  was  obtained  by  Professor  Ilayden's 
party  at  Church  Buttes. 

Fig.  4,  Plate  XX,  represents  three  tarsal  bones  obtained  by  Professor  Hay- 
den's  party  at  Church  Buttes.  They  pertained  to  the  same  individual,  and 
consist  of  the  cuboid,  scaphoid,  and  the  outer  cuneiform. 

The  cuboid  is  more  cubical  and  stouter  than  in  the  tapir.  The  upper 
surface  is  more  regularly  square  and  nearly  a  third  wider  than  in  that  animal. 
The  articular  facet  for  the  calcaneum  has  about  the  same  depth,  but  is  nearly 
twice  the  width.  The  facet  for  the  first  metatarsal  bone  is  also  of  equal 
depth,  but  a  tliird  greater  in  width. 

The  scaphoid  is  of  rather  less  breadth  than  in  the  tapir,  nearly  of  equal 
depth,  but  not  quite  so  thick.  The  articular  facet  for  the  astragalus  is  of 
about  the  same  extent,  less  breadth,  Init  proportionately  more  uniform  depth, 
and  it  is  less  concave.  The  articular  facet  for  the  outer  cuneiform  is  of  about 
the  same  depth,  but  of  much  less  breadth  than  in  the  tapir.  The  fiicets  for 
tiie  inner  two  cuneiforms  have  about  the  same  extent  as  in  the  latter. 

The  external  cuneiform  is  about  the  same  depth  as  in  the  tapir,  l)ut  of  con- 
siderable less  breadth  and  of  greater  thickness. 

The  metatarsal  articular  facets  of  the  cuboid  and  external  cuneiiljrm  ap- 
pear to  indicate  that  the  outer  toe  of  Palasosyops  was  as  large  as  the  middle 


45 

loc,  and  thai  this  was  much  smaller  than  in  the  tapir.  This  a[)|)cars  to  he 
confirmed  by  the  specimen  represented  in  Fig.  5,  Plate  XX,  which  1  suppose 
to  be  a  middle  metatarsal  of  Palaeosyops.  It  was  found  by  L)r.  Corson  in 
the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger.  It  resembles  the  correspondibng  one  ol"  the 
tapir,  but  is  shorter  and  of  more  slender  proportions.  It  has  about  the  size 
of  the  lateral  metatarsals  of  the  tapir. 

Figs.  6  and  7,  Plate  XX,  represent  a  tirst  and  second  phalanx,  probal)ly  of 
Palaeosyops.  The  specimen  of  the  first  was  obtained  by  Dr.  Carter  on  Henry's 
Fork  of  Green  River;  the  specimen  of  the  second  was  found  near  Fort 
Bridger. 

A  specimen  of  a  metacarpal,  which  I  suppose  to  l)clong  to  Palseosyops, 
was  obtained  by  Dr.  Corson  at  Grizzly  Buttes.  It  has  about  the  same  length 
as  the  middle  metatarsal  attributed  to  Palseosyops,  but  is  somewhat  wider. 
If  it  corresponds  with  the  second  of  the  series  of  four  toes  of  the  fore  foot 
of  the  tapir,  it  exhibits  a  corresponding  reduction  in  relation  \vith  the  con- 
tiguous toes  that  the  middle  metatarsal  does  to  the  others  of  the  hind  loot. 

Palteosyops  major. 

A  larger  species  of  Palseosyops  is  apparently  indicated  by  some  fragments 
of  large  bones  obtained  by  Dr.  Carter  at  Grizzly  Buttes  and  other  localities 
in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger.  Several  of  the  specimens  consist  of  ])ortions 
of  limb-bones,  but  too  much  mutilated  either  for  description  or  representa- 
tion. Even  the  best  specimen,  consisting  of  a  fragment  of  the  lower  jaw,  rep- 
resented in  Fig.  8,  Plate  XX,  is  barely  more  than  sufficient  to  render  it 
[)robable  that  it  pertained  to  Palaeosyops.  The  jaw-specimen  is  furthermore 
in  some  degree  abnormal  in  form,  due  to  inflammation  or  some  other  affection 
connected  with  the  second  molar  tooth.  The  bone  outside  the  position  of 
the  latter  is  much  swollen,  and  the  alveolar  border  is  hollowed  out  and  irregu- 
lar. The  alveolus  is  also  filled  with  the  clay  matrix,  so  that  the  tooth  \\as 
perhaps  lost  before  the  death  of  the  animal.  In  its  proportions,  the  jaw,  in  a 
normal  condition,  would  appear  to  be  of  more  robust  character  than  in 
Palceosyops  pabidosus.  In  its  present  state,  the  base  is  more  convex  fore  and 
aft  than  in  the  latter,  and  the  alveolar  border  more  ascending  posteriorly. 

The  remains  of  the  molar  fangs  at  the  entrance  of  the  alveoli  appear  to 
indicate  teeth  of  the  same  form  and  construction  as  in  Falccosyojjs  paludosus^ 


46 

for  whicli  reason  (he  fragiiient  was  rei'erred  t(j  the  same  genus.  The  true 
molars  appear  to  have  occupied  a  space  of  4|  inches,  tlioiigh  this  is  probably 
somewhat  exaggerated,  as  the  interval  occupied  hy  the  last  intermediate  molar 
appears  proportionately  somewhat  too  large.  The  crown  of  the  last  molar, 
which  was  clearly  trilobate  as  in  Pal(zosyoj>s  paludosus,  had  an  antero-posterior 
diameter  of  2  inches. 

The  former  existence  of  a  larger  species  than  Palceosyops  paludosus,  and 
probably  the  same  as  that  indicated  under  the  name  at  the  head  of  the  present 
chapter,  is  apparently  confirmed  by  more  characteristic  .materials  placed  at 
.  my  disposal  by  Dr.  Carter  in  my  recent  visit  to  Fort  Bridger.  One  of  the 
best  preserved  specimens  consists  of  the  greater  part  of  the  left  ramus  of  the 
lower  jaw,  containing  six  molar  teeth,  as  seen  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  XXIII.  The 
jaw  is  considerably  more  robust  than  in  those  referred  to  Palceosyops  paludosus, 
though  not  to  the  degree  I  supposed  from  a  view  of  the  diseased  specimen 
above  described.  At  the  side  it  is  more  rounded  toward  the  base,  and  is  more 
convex  in  a  curving  line  from  the  root  of  the  coronoid  process  beneath  the 
true  molars,  and  is  more  bent  inward  and  convex  from  the  position  just  indi- 
cated toward  the  technical  angle  of  the  bone.  Rugosities  of  the  surface  in 
several  positions  indicate  stronger  attachment  of  the  soft  parts,  in  accordance 
with  the  greater  bulk  of  the  animal,  than  in  Paloiosyops  imludosus. 

The  true  molars  have  the  same  form  and  proportions  as  in  the  species  just 
named.  Trifling  differences  appear  to  be  dependent  only  on  a  difference  in 
the  robust  character  of  the  species.  The  external  basal  ridge  is  slightly  bet- 
ter developed,  as  is  also  the  case  with  the  median  I'idge,  descending  on  the 
inner  slope  of  the  external  lobes  of  the  crown.  The  back  lobe  of  the  la.st 
molar  is  also  rather  better  developed,  and  incloses  a  shallower  fossa  on  its 
imicr  side. 

The  first  premolar,  situated  immediately  behind  the  canine,  is  inserted  by 
a  single  fang,  and  is  separated  from  the  second  premolar  by  a  hiatus  about  a 
third  of  an  inch  in  extent.  Below  the  hiatus,  the  jaw  externally  presents  a 
small  concavity. 

The  last  premolar  has  the  same  form  as  that  in  the  jaw  referred  to 
P(d(BOsyops  paltidosus^  though,  from  its  worn  condition,  it  looks  different.  In- 
dependent of  this,  it  exhibits  no  diflerence  except  that  the  base  in  advance 
of  llu'  anterior  lobe  is  [)n>duc-cd  exlcnially  in  a  strong  ridge. 


47 

The  tliirtl  prcinohir  also  is  like  that  of  PalfEosyops  pnludos/zs,  c\ce[)i'\ug  that 
it  exhibits  a  tendency  to  the  prudiiclion  of  a  ba.sal  ridge  nut  evident  in 
the  former. 

The  second  premolar,  not  present  in  the  jaw-specimen  of  Pakeosyops 
puludosus,  is  a  reduced  form  of  the  tooth  behind  it.  A  portion  of  the  canine 
alveolus  retained  in  the  specimen  indicates  a  tooth  of  moderate  size  in  com- 
parison with  the  size  of  the  jaw  itself 

*  Another  series  of  lower  molar  teeth,  attached  to  small  jaw-fragments,  and 
represented  in  Fig.  2,  Plate  XXIII,  also  appear  to  me  to  be  referable  to 
Pul(Bosyops  major  notwithstanding  certain  diiferences  presented  b^'  the  pre- 
molars. The  teeth  are  considerably  more  worn  than  in  the  preceding  speci-. 
men ;  most  of  the  summits  of  the  constituent  lobes  of  the  crown  of  the  mo- 
lars and  last  premolar  being  so  worn  as  to  exhibii  islets  of  exposed  dentine. 
The  second  molar  is  most  worn,  and  presents  on  the  summits  of  the  outer  or 
principal  lobes  broad,  depressed,  shield-shaped  tracts  of  dentine. 

The  molars  have  the  same  constitution  as  in  the  preceding  specimen.  The 
last  one  is  smaller,  but  the  others  arc  nearly  of  the  same  size,  except  that  the 
iirst  one  is  thicker,  especially  at  its  fore  part,  and  is  therefore  of  more  uniform 
diiimeter.  The  basal  ridge  of  the  anterior  two  molars  is  better  developed 
externally  than  in  the  former  specimen.  In  the  first  molar  the  anterior  lobe, 
being  proportionately  rather  better  developed  than  in  the  corresponding  tooth 
of  the  previous  specimen,  its  anterior  ridge  curving  inwardly,  is  stronger,  and 
it  embraces  a  more  conspicuous  fossa. 

Tlie  last  premolar  differs  somewhat  in  proportions  from  that  of  the  former 
specimen,  but  is  otherwise  nearly  the  same,  except  so  far  as  it  is  altered  in 
appearance  from  being  more  worn.  It  is  of  less  breadth  fore  and  aft,  and 
is  thicker,  and  it  docs  not  present  the  ridge  at  the  fore  part  of  the  base, 
externally,  of  the  anterior  lobe,  being  in  this  respect  more  like  the  corre- 
sponding tooth  in  the  jaw-specimen  of  Pulaosijops  paludosus. 

The  third  premolar  differs  from  that  of  the  former  specimen  very  much  in 
the -same  manner  as  the  succeeding  tooth.  The  crown  is  of  less  l)readtli  fore 
and  aft,  and  is  thicker.  It  has  exactly  the  same  constitution,  but  looks  differ- 
ent on  account  of  its  more  worn  condition,  its  difference  of  proportion,  and 
from  the  absence  of  a  basal  ridge  occupying  the  fore  part  of  the  crown,  exter- 
nally, in  the  former  specimen. 

Comparative   measurements  of  the  teclh  and    jaws  of  the  specimens  just 


48 


referred  to  Pulccosyops  major,  and  tlic  jaw-specimen,  witli  teeth,  of  P.  palu- 
dosus,  are  as  follows  : 


Depth  of  jaw  at  middle  of  last  molar 

De'lith  of  jaw  at  middle  of  last  premolar 

Thickness  of  jaw  below  interval  of  last  two  molars 

Thickness  of  jaw  below  third  premolar 

Distance  from  canine  alveolus  to  back  of  last  molar 

Length  of  the  complete  molar  series 

Length  of  the  molar  series,  excluding  the  first  premolar 

Length  of  the  molar  series,  exclnding  the  first  two  premolars 

Length  of  the  premolar  series 

Length  of  the  true  molar  series 

Breadth  of  second  premolar 

Thickness  of  second  premolar 

Breadth  of  third  premolar 

Thickness  of  third  premolar ... 

Breadth  of  fourth  premolar 

Thickness  of  fourth  premolar 

Breadth  of  first  molar ". 

Thickness  of  first  molar 

Bieadth  of  second  molar 

Thickness  of  second  molar  

Breadth  of  third  molar .  - 

Tbickness  of  third  molar 


PaliBosyops 
major. 


Lines. 
37 
26 
IG 
14 
92 
90 
82 
72 
38 
53 

9 

5 

8^ 

7 
13i 

9 
ICi 

m 

24 
13i 


Lines. 


08 
51 


8 
G 
8a 

13i 

ICJ 

wl 

22 
12 


Paliposyops 
paludosus. 


Lines. 
32 
23 
13 
lOi 
?77 


64 
4GJ 


8.i 

5i 
9 

6:} 

12i 

s" 

15 

9i 
19 
10 


Some  additional  specimens,  found  by  Dr.  Corson  iu  the  buttes  of  Dry 
Creek  Caflon,  appear  to  belong  to  tlie  larger  Palaeosyops.  These  consist  of 
some  upper  tectli,  comprising  a  canine,  a  second  and  last  premolar,  and  the 
second  and  third  molars. 

The  latter  are  represented  in  Figs    10,  11,  Plate  XXIII,  and  they  agree 
in  character  witli  the  corresponding  smaller  teetli  described  nnder  the  head " 
of  Pu/cBO-si/ojys  paludosus.     They  are  but  slightly  worn  at  the  summits  of  the 
lobes  of  the  crown,  and  the  enamel  is  conspicnonsly  wrinkled. 

The  last  premolar,  represented  in  Fig.  9,  of  the  same  plate,  likewise  agrees 
with  the  corresponding  tooth  described  umler  the  head  of  PalcBOstjops  palu- 
dosus,  except  that  it  is  of  larger  size.  The  tooth  is  Init  slightly  worn,  and 
e.xhil^its  a  much  less  wrinkled  condition  of  the  enamel  than  the  true  molars. 

The  second  premolar,  represented  in  Fig.  8,  resembles  in  form  that  of  the 
second  series  of  specimens  of  upper  molar  teeth,  described  under  the  head  of 


40 


I'lihvosijops  paludo.'iu.s.  It  is  larger,  less  worn,  and  has,  comparatively  with 
the  true  molars,  smooth  enamel. 

An  upper  canine  tooth,  i-epresented  in  Fig.  7,  is  of  less  size  than  that  in 
the  facial  specimen  of  PalceosyojJS  paludosus^  the  reverse  of  the  condition  in 
lliis  respect  of  the  molar  teeth.  The  canine  tootii  resembles,  in  its  form  an<l 
proportions,  the  corresponding  weapon  of  the  bear.  The  crown  is  of  mod- 
erate length,  and  cnrved  conical.  It  is  provided  with  a  subacute  ridge  in 
front  and  behind,  defining  the  smaller  inner  face  from  the  outer  one,  and  has 
the  base  slightly  thickened  internally.  The  enamel  is  nearly  smooth,  and  is 
somewhat  worn  on  the  anterior  face.  The  fang  is  considerably  longer  than 
the  crown,  less  curved,  and  is  in  some  degree  gibbous. 

A  lateral  incisor,  represented  in  Fig.  5,  Plate  XXIV,  is  a  strong  tooth, 
somewhat  resembling  that  of  the  tapir.  The  crown  is  conical,  with  the  inntu- 
and  outer  faces  defined  by  ridges,  with  the  base  thickened  in  front,  and  u 
strong  basal  ridge  internally.  The  fang  is  about  twice  the  length  of  i\\£, 
crown,  and  is  somewhat  sigmoid. 

The  measurements  of  the  upper  teeth  of  PahEosyops  major,  in  comparison 
with  those  of  P.  paludosuSy  are  as  follows  : 


Autero-posterior  diameter  of  last  upper  molar    . . 

Transverse  diameter  of  last  upper  molar 

Autero-posterior  diameter  of  secoud  upper  molar 

Transverse  diameter  of  second  upper  molar 

Antero-posterior  diameter  of  last  premolar 

Transverse  diameter  of  last  premolar ' 

Autero-posterior  diameter  of  second  premolar  . . . 

Transverse  diameter  of  second  premolar 

Leugtli  of  crown  of  cauiue 

Autero-posterior  diameter  of  base  of  cauiue 

Transverse  diameter  of  base  of  canine 

Diameter  of  fang  of  cauiue 

Length  of  crown  of  lateral  incisor 

Diameter  of  base  of  crown  of  incisor 

Diameter  of  fang  of  incisor 


Palu'osyoiis, 

Pahcosyops 

major. 

paluilosus. 

Lines. 

Zincs. 

18 

18 

19 

IGa 

19 

10 

IS 

10 

lOJ 

9 

12.i 

11 

9 

8 

7.i 

1 

]S 

10 



11 

ru 

10 

7 

8 

A  small  collection  of  teeth  belonging  to  the  larger  Palaeosyops  was  obtained 
by  Dr.  Carter  in  a  butte  ten  miles  distant  from  Dry  Ci'eek  Canon.  Amoiiir 
llic  specimens  there  is  a  scries  of  upper  premolars,   froin   the  second   to  the 

7   G 


50 

last,  inclusive,  ir[)i-cs('iitctl  in  Fii^.  12,  Plate  XXIII.  The  crowns  of  the 
teeth  are  worn,  and  also  somewhat  eroJeil,  Init  not  to  such  an  extent  as  tu 
obscure  their  characters. 

The  last  npper  premolar  agrees  \\  ith  that  previously  described  and  referred 
to  Palceosyops  major,  except  that  it  is  of  more  uniform  width. 

The  third  premolar  is  a  reduced  representative  of  that  behind  it,  i)nt  is  also 
pro])ortionately  of  less  width  transversely. 

The  second  premolar  is  like  the  corresjujuding  tooth  above  described  and 
referred  to  Palaosyops  major,  but  is  considerably  nari'ower  fore  and  aft. 

A  much  worn  upper  true  molar,  partially  broken  away  externally,  is  rather 
smaller  than  the  specimen  of  a  second  upper  molar  above  described  and 
referred  to  PalcBosyops  major.  It  sufficiently  accords  with  it  to  be  the  first 
of  the  series  of  true  molars. 

Another  specimen  consists  of  a  mutilated  canine,  intermediate  in  size  to 
the  more  perfect  one  above  described,  and  the  larger  one,  contained  in  the 
facial  specimen  described  under  the  head  oi'  Pa/ausj/ops  j)aludosi/s.  The  fimg 
toward  the  extremity  is  more  curved  than  in  either  of  the  other  specimens. 

An  upper  lateral  incisor  was  about  the  size  of  the  one  previously  described, 
l)ut  has  a  stouter  fang.  Its  crown,  Ijroken  toward  the  point,  is  deeply  \\orn 
away  internally. 

Another  incisor,  a  lower  one,  is  represented  in  Fig.  15,  Plate  XXIII.  It 
has  a  short,  conical  crown,  with  a  strong  basal  i-idge  posteriorly. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimens  are  as  follows: 

Liiu's. 

Antero-posterior  diameter  of  upper  true  molar,  estimated 10 

Transverse  diameter  of  upper  true  molar 18 

Antero-ijosterior  diameter  of  upper  last  premolar S'} 

Transverse  diameter  of  upper  last  premolar 1-| 

Anteroposterior  diameter  of  upper  third  pi-einolar 8 

Transverse  diameter  of  upper  tiiird  premolar. 11':^ 

Autero-posterior  diameter  of  upi)er  second  premolar 7 

Transver.se  diameter  of  upper  second  premolar ,  8^ 

Length  of  fang  of  canine -^ 

Diameter  of  fang  of  canine 12 

Length  of  fang  of  npper  incisor 2-! 

Diameter  of  fang  of  u[)per  incisor 7i 

Length  of  crown  of  knvvr  incisor 0 

Antero-posterior  diameter  of  lower  incisor 0 

Transverse  diameter  of  lower  incisor ■ 5 

An  important  and  instructive  specimen  pertaining  to  /'^/Zews/yo^w /«(//o/- is 
reiiresenfed  in  Fig.  Iti,  Plate  XXIII,  and  Fig.  1,  Plate  XXIV.     It  consists 


51 

of  a  cranium,  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  in  the  hutles  uf  Dry  Creek  Canon. 
The  specimen  was  broken  into  many  pieces,  but  tliese  have  been  united  so 
as  to  give  us  a  good  idea  of  the  shape  and  construction  of  tlie  cranium.  This 
is  of  remarkable  form,  and  exhibits  more  resemblance  to  that  of  a  bear  flian 
to  that  of  its  nearer  relative  the  tapir. 

The  forehead,  as  seen  in  the  upper  view  of  the  cranium,  Fig  IG,  Plab^ 
XXIII,  forms  a  long  triangle,  with  the  apex  prolonged  backward  and  expanded 
at  the  summit  of  the  occiput.  Its  fore  part  more  abruptly  widens  as  it  exten<ls 
outwardly  upon  the  conspicuous  postorbital  processes.  Its  surface  from  the 
apex  forward  is  strongly  convex,  but  approaching  the  muzzle  between  tlie 
position  of  the  postorbital  processes  it  becomes  in  the  same  direction  con- 
cave. Transversely  it  is  nearly  straight  between  the  boundaries  of  the  tem- 
l»oral  ibss;e,  but  is  convex  between  the  postorbital  processes.  The  lalter 
are  strong  and  unusually  prominent,  trihedral,  hook-like  projections.  Their 
upper  acute  border  forms  the  anterior  extension  of  the  temporal  boundary 
from  the  forehead.  Their  supra-orbital  margin  curves  from  the  tiice  Jiack- 
ward  and  outward  to  the  point.  Their  anterior  or  facial  surface  is  depressed 
or  concave. 

The  postorbital  process  preserved  in  the  specimen  is  broken  at  the  end, 
but  is  there  so  narrow  as  to  make  it  appear  that  it  did  not  meet  an  ascending 
process  from  the  malar  l)one  as  to  Ibrm  a  postorbital  arch.  The  strongly 
arched  supra-orbital  border  is  directed  outward  with  a  moderate  backw  ard 
inclination,  indicating  a  more  forward  direction  for  the  orbit  than  in  the  tapir 
and  rhinoceros. 

The  short  postorbital  eminence  of  the  malar  bone  in  tlie  facial  sjiecimen 
referred  to  Falatosyops  paludosus,  and  represented  in  Fig.  51,  Plate  XVIII, 
would  also  indicate  that  the  orbits  were  oj^en  behind  in  Palset)syops,  notwith- 
standing the  great  length  of  the  postorbital  process  of  the  frontal  in  the 
specimen  under  consideration. 

The  l)ase  of  the  muzzle,  or  the  face,  between  the  position  of  the  orbits  is 
broad  and  convex. 

,  Tiic  specimen  exhibits  no  evident  traces  of  the  sutural  conjunctions  of  the 
parietals,  frontal,  the  maxillaries,  and  the  nasals. 

The  cranial  crest  separating  the  temporal  fossa;  is  exceedingly  short  com- 
pared with  that  of  the  tapir.  It  is  formed  by  the  approach  of  the  temporal 
l)oundaries,  which   appear  in    this   position   as   two    ot)tusc   ridges   squeezed 


52       • 

tugethcf,  and  leaving  between  thcni  a  narrow  groove  extending  from  the  tore- 
head  to  a  transverse  concavity  at  the  summit  of"  the  occiput. 

The  temporal  fossas  are  of  huge  proportions,  and  appear  even  to  exceed  those 
of  the  greatest  living  carnivores,  as  the  lion  and  the  Bengal  tiger.  The  zygo- 
mata are  as  prominent  as  in  these,  but  are  proportionately  of  greater  strength, 
being  both  deeper  and  thicker.  Excepting  in  their  greater  extension  out- 
wardly from  the  posterior  root,  as  in  the  latter  animals,  in^  their  sigmoid  direc- 
tion downward  and  forward  they  are  more  like  those  in  the  tapir.  Their 
outer  surface  is  convex,  and  is  directed  obliquely  upward. 

The  temporal  surface  at  the  side  of  the  cranium,  and  extending  on  the 
zygomatic  root,  forms  a  deep  excavation  or  concavity  slightly  overhung  by  the 
upper  part  of  the  temporal  ridge.  It  exhibits  a  comparatively  feeble  swelling 
aljout  the  position  of  the  squamous  suture,  but  much  less  conspicuous  than  that 
in  the  tapir.  The  great  hollow  of  the  temporal  surface  is  in  striking  contrast 
with  the  sweUing  of  the  corresponding  surfiice  in  the  great  living  carnivores, 
and  \yhile  it  is  expressive  of  an  equal  if  not  greater  extent  of  powerful  muscles, 
it  is  further  expressive  of  a  proportionate  decrease  in  the  capacity  of  the  cra- 
nium and  therefore  of  a  much  smaller  brain. 

The  cranium  is  constricted  at  the  sides  at  the  lower  ])art  of  the  temporal 
fossse,  just  in  advance  of  their  middle,  and  the  fore  part,  independent  of  tlnj 
extension  of  tlie  zygomatic  roots,  appears  nearly  as  wide  as  tiic  back  part. 

The  squamosals  are  large,  and  reach  half  way  up  the  temporal  surface.  A 
conspicuous  group  of  neuro-vascular  foramina  occupy  their  upper  back  part, 
including  the  contiguous  part  of  the  parietals.  The  occiput  is  wider  than 
high,  is  strongly  concave  above,  but  at  the  lower  part  slopes  backward  to  the 
margin  of  the  occipital  foramen.  Its  sides  below  are  bent  forwarti,  as  in  the 
tapir,  and  the  lateral  borders  above,  as  in  the  latter  animal,  are  produced  in 
wing-like  expansions.  The  basal  angles  of  the  occipital  triangle  arc  formed 
by  comparatively  short,  wide  processes,  composed  of  the  conjoined  paramas- 
toid  and  post-tympanic  processes.  These  extend  iToni  within  the  position  of 
the  occipital  condyles  and  reach  outwardly  a  considerable  width  beyond  them, 
but  do  not  project  much  below  the  root  of  attachment  of  the  condyles.  The 
occipital  condyles  ;;re  of  greater  proportionate  width  but  less  depth  than  in 
the  tapir  or  the  bear;  and  they  project  from  the  occipital  surface  backward 
more  than  in  either  of  those  animals.  The  occipital  foramen  is  transversely 
oval. 


53 

The  general  plane  of  tlu!  uceipul  is  intermediate  in  ils  degree  of  inelinatidii 
to  that  of  the  tapir  and  our  large  caruivores,,  and  is  indeed  nearly  vertical. 
The  occipital  condyles  project  posterior  to  the  general  surface,  and  thus  form 
tlie  most  pi-ominent  portion  of  the  occiput,  whereas  in  the  tapir,  bear,  and  cats 
the  summit  of  the  occiput  is  most  prominent  backward. 

The  articular  surfaces  of  the  condyles  extend  forward  on  the  basi-oceipital, 
and  approach  quite  near  each  other,  as  in  the  bear. 

A  large  vencnis  foramen  occupies  the  course  of  the  occipi to-temporal  suture, 
about  the  center  of  the  lateral  plane  of  tlie  occiput. 

The  auditory  archway  is  high  and  narrow  compared  with  that  of  the  tapir. 
It  is  widest  above  and  has  its  sides  converging  inwardly. 

The  post-glenoid  tubercle,  compared  with  that  in  the  tapir  and  ijcar,  is  very 
thick  and  strong.  It  is  broad  and  mammillary,  and  is  directed  obliquely  out- 
ward and  projects  downward  below  the  post-tympanic  process.  The  base  of 
the  cranium  is  very  broad  compared  with  that  of  the  tapir,  and  in  this  resi)cct 
is  more  like  that  of  the  great  carnivores. 

The  basi-occipital  is  broad  and  thick.  It  narrows  forward  from  the  posi- 
tion of  the  paramastoid  processes.  Its  sides  are  concave  from  before  back- 
ward, slope  strongly  from  the  upper  edge  toward  each  other,  and  are  sepa- 
rated by  a  median  carina  which  expands  behind  and  ends  in  front  in  a  prom- 
inence. The  basi-sphcnoid,  completely  co-ossified  with  the  basi-occipital, 
appears  as  a  narrowed  extension  of  this,  and  is  transversely  convex. 

Large  vacant  spaces,  occupied  with  the  matrix  of  the  fossil,  are  situated 
below  the  position  of  the  petrosals.     The  tympanies  are  lost. 

The  glenoid  articular  surface  is  broad  and  nearly  horizontal  above,  and 
extends  obliquely  downward,  outward,  and  backward  on  the  robust  post- 
glenoid  tubercle. 

The  anterior  condyloid  foramen  is  situated  about  three-fourths  of  an  intdi 
in  advance  of  the  occipital  condyle. 

The  root  of  the  pterygoid  process  is  pierced  with  an  ali-sphenoid  canal,  and 
the  oval  foramen  occupies  a  position  just  above  it. 

Measurements  of  the  cranium  are  as  follows: 

Length  of  crauium  from  tbe  C0Qca,vity  at  the  summit  of  the  occiput  to  a 
line  between  the  post-orbital  processes,  following-  the  curvature  of  the 
forehead 9    inches. 

Breadth  acress  the  face,  following  the  convexity  between  the  ends  of  the 

post-orbital  processes S^  inches, 

Distance  between  the  orbits  across  the  face  above 0     inches. 


54 

Thickness  of  tlie  short  ciauiul  crest  seiKiratiiii;- the  temporal  l'oss;i' poste- 
riorly        3  i"*^li 

Breadth  of  temiioral  foss;e  from  the  occipital  border  to  the  end  of  the  i)OSt- 

orbital  process 9    inches. 

Vertical  extent  in  advance  of  zygomatic  root •.     5    inches. 

lireadth  of  cranium  outside  of  zygomata 11    inches. 

Height  of  occiput  . .    53  inclaes. 

Breadth  of  occiput  at  post-tympanic  processes    (ii  inches. 

Breadth  of  cranium  at  ends  of  post-glenoid  processes 8    inches. 

Transverse  diameter  of  occipital  foramen ; . .   23  lines. 

Vertical  diameter  of  occipital  foramen,  estimated ■. IG  lines. 

Breadth  at  occipital  condyles  together 47  lines. 

Depth  of  occipital  condyles IS  linos. 

Breadth  of  occii)ital  condyles 19  Hues. 

Width  of  basi-occipital  at  anterior  condyloid  foramiua. 18  lines. 

Width  of  basi-occipital  at  conjunction  with  basisphenoid 15  Hues. 

Distauce  between  glenoid  articular  surfaces 51  lines. 

An  upper-jaw  fragment,  from  the  same  individual  as  the  cranium  just 
described,  contains  the  last  two  molars,  of  wliicli  the  pemdtimatc  one  is  re[)- 
resented  in  Fig.  3,  Plate  XXIV.  This  tooth  closely  resembles  the  corre- 
sponding one  of  the  same  species  represented  in  Fig.  10,  Plate  XXIII,  and 
also  that  of  Paloiosijops  paludosus  as  represented  in  Figs.  3  to  5,  Plate  IV,  and 
Fig.  9,  Plate  V.  The  last  molar,  as  fai*  as  it  is  preserved,  likewise  resembles 
the  corresponding  tooth  represented  in  the  same  places.  The  inner  part  of 
the  crown  presents  a  single  conical  lobe. 

The  infVa-or])ital  Ijorder  forms  a  thick,  obtusely  rounded  ledge  projecting 
obliquely  forward  on  the  face.  In  Palaosyops  faludomH  the  corresponding 
ridge  presents  an  acute  anterior  edge  defining  it  from  the  facial  surface  beneath. 
The  outer  ])art  of  the  thick  infra-orbital  ridge  rises  in  a  short,  l)lunt,  conical  emi- 
nence or  postorbital  process.  The  orbital  floor  is  concavely  depressed  within 
the  prominent  margin,  and  forms  a  long,  triangular  platform  terminating 
beiiind  in  the  thick  posterior  boundary  of  the  maxilla. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows: 

Lines. 

Space  occupied  by  the  last  two  molars 32 

Breadth  of  second  molar • 20 

Width  of  second  molar 20 

Height  of  anterior  orbital  margin  from  the  molars 20 

Fragments  of  both  sides  of  the  lower  jaw  with  all  the  teeth  broken  away, 

except  portions  of  the  last  molars,  also  accompany  the   preceding  sjiecimens. 

The  best  preserved  fragment  partially  restored  from  the  corresponding  ]>or- 

li(ni  of  the  opposite  side  is  represented  in  Fig.  4,  Plate  XXIV.     It  agrees  in 


T 


DO 


i'onn  niid  pi'dpoiiioiis  willi  the  same  jxirlioii  ol'  \\\c  jaw  in  Palceoxi/o/is  pnUi- 
(losus,  excei)tiiig  that  the  masseteric  fossa-  is  nuicli  deeper.  The  preser- 
vation of  the  angle  of  the  jaw,  not  retained  in  any  of  thi^  previous  specimens  of 
Palaeosyops,  permits  the  determination  of  its  character.  It  presents  a  nearly 
serai-circular  border  projecting  moderately  below  ti)e  base  of  the  bone,  and  in 
a  less  degree   posteriorly.     Toward   the  base  it  is  somewhat  bent  inward. 

The  last  molar,  in  a  restored  condition,  of  the  natural  size,  is  re|)resente<l 
in  Fig.  14,  I'late  XXIII,  but,  unfortunately,  the  artist  has  made  its  tliickness 
in  front  proportionately  too  great. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  t()llows: 


Palaiosyops 
uuijor. 

Paloeosyopa 
liahulosus. 

Distance  from  last  molar  to  back  border  of  jaw 

Lilies. 
01 
■72 
35 
10 
22 
13 

Hi 

Livcfi. 
4!) 

Deptli  from  coiidvle  to  bottom  of  angle 

I)(^i)tli  of  iaw  bt^low  fore  nart  of  last  uiolar      .      .                 

30 

Tlii(!kiioss  of  i;iw  bolow  forp,  i>a,rt  of  List  iiiohir                  . .    - 

14 

Tjveadtli  of  last  molar  tooth 

10 

Wkltb  at  fore  part  of  last  molar  tooth 

Width  at  middle  part  of    last   molar  tooth 

lOi 

Fragments  of  another  jaw  similar  to  the  above,  and  presenting  the  same 
comparatively  deep  masseteric  tbssa,  were  found  by  Dr.  Corson  at  Grizzly 
Buttes. 

Fig.  2,  Plate  XXIV,  represents  a  mutilated  facial  portion  of  a  skull  appar- 
ently referable  to  PalcBosyops  major.  The  specimen  was  found  on  one  of  the 
buttes  of  the  Bridger  formation  by  a  Shoshone  Indian,  and  brought  to  Dr. 
Carter,  by  whom  it  was  presented  to  the  writer.  Though  much  distorted  in 
form,  it  gives  us  a  fair  idea  of  the  shape  and  construction  of  a  portion  of  the 
skull  of  Palseosyops  that  we  had  not  previously  had  the  opportunity  of  ex- 
amining. It  is  crushed  in  such  a  manner  that  the  upper  part  of  the  face  is 
pressed  downward  and  toward  the  right  side,  and  the  orbit  has  its  roof 
brought  near  to  the  floor,  so  that  it  looks  as  if  it  were  closed  behind  l)y  the 
presence  of  a  postorbital  bridge. 

The  specimen  shows  that  the  form  and  construction  of  the  face  of  Paloeo- 
syops  are  very  similar  to  what  they  are  in  Paleeotheiium.  The  upper  part  of 
the  face  appears  to  have  been  directed  in  a  moderately  sigmoid  course,  nearly 
horizontallv  from  the  bottom  of  the  convex  forehead  to  the  end  of  the  muz- 


56 


zle.  The  n;i«ils  are  large,  thick,  and  strong.  Proportionately  they  exceed  in 
length  those  of  the  Pal«othere,  the  rhinoceros,  and  the  tapir.  If  I  mis- 
take not  a  tiacture  for  a  suture,  their  posterior  extremity  reaches  as  ftir  as  the 
position  of  the  fore  part  of  the  orbits,  and  their  free  extremity  projects  quite 
as  much  as  the  jaws.  They  are  strongly  arched  transversely  and  are  mdre 
abruptly  rounded  and  thick  at  the  lateral  'borders.  They  gradually  narrow 
tljrward  and  terminate  in  a  blunt  extremity,  which  is  nearly  straight  but 
rounded  at  the  outer  angles.  Posteriorly,  they  include  a  deep  and  wide  an- 
gular notch,  which  receives  a  corresponding  angular  prolongation  of  the 
fVontals. 

The  lateral  nasal  notch  resembles  that  of  the  rhinoceros,  Init  is  propor- 
tinnately  of  greater  depth,  and  in  this  respect  also  resembles  that  of  the 
Palseothere.  Its  exact  extent  cannot  be  determined  on  account  of  the  mu- 
tilated condition  of  the  specimen.    . 

The  upper  jaw  in  its  form  and  proportions  is  nearly  like  that  of  the  Palaso- 
there.  It  is  of  greater  proportionate  depth  below  the  orbit,  and  exhibits  a 
greater  swell  at  the  border  of  the  nasal  notch,  due  to  the  greater  size  of  the 
canine  teeth.  The  infra-orbital  foramen  is  large,  and  is'situated  over  the 
position  of  the  last  premolar.  The  hard  palate  is  flat  along  the  middle  an- 
teriorly. Its  posterior  part  is  destroyed  in  the  specimen,  so  as  to  prevent 
the  determination  of  its  extent. 

The  incisive  foramina  appear  to  be  comparatively  small  and  widely  separated. 
They  appear  also  to  be  circular,  and  continuous  with  grooves  descending  for- 
ward to  the  incisive  alveoli. 

The  teeth  form  a  series  as  unbroken  nearly  as  in  Anoplotherium.  They 
are  all  mutilated  in  the  specimen,  but  the  crown  of  the  last  premolar,  and  the 
molars  are  sufficiently  well  preserved  to  exhibit  the  characteristics  of  Palseo- 
syops  as  already  described. 

Measurements  of  the  specimen,  for  the  most  part  approximative  on  account 

of  its  distorted  condition,  are  as  follows : 

Length  of  jaw  from  back  of  last  molar  to  front  of  incisive  alveoli 9    inches. 

Length  of  face  from  the  anterior  orbital  margin  to  the  end  of  the  nose. . .  7     inches. 

LcngtL  of  the  nasals  in  the  median  line 5 J  inches. 

Breadth  of  the. nasals  together  at  their  middle 3^  inches. 

Length  of  space  occupied  by  the  molar  series Csjr  inches. 

Length  of  space  occupied  by  the  true  molars 3^  inches. 

r.readtli  of  last  premolar ; 9    lines. 

Width  of  last  premolar , 12    lines. 


57 


Breadth  of  lirst  molar .'  _ .  14a  liues. 

Width  of  hrst  molar 14j^,  ijups. 

Breadth  of  secoud  molar Kj"  ijucx. 

Width  of  second  molar k;    lines. 

Breadth  of  last  molar 19j  lines. 

Width  of  last  molar 18    liues. 

Width  Of  palate  betweeu  canines 2S    lines. 

Width  of  canine  alveoli 9    lines. 

PALyEOSYOPS    JUNIUS. 

Dr.  Carter  recently  sent  the  writer  several  small  fragments  of  the  rit^ht 
side  of  a  lower  jaw,  togetiier  with  a  sketch  of  a  larger  fragment  of  the  left 
side,  containing  the  last  premolar  and  the  succeeding  molars.  The  s|)eci- 
mens  were  obtained  from  the  Bridger  beds,  and  appear  to  indicate  a  small 
species  of  Palasosyops,  though  it  is  not  improbable  that  they  pertain  to  a 
small  variety  of  P.  paludosus. 

The  parts  agree  closely  with  the  corresponding  parts  of  the  lower  jaw  and 
teeth  of  the  latter,  except  in  size.  They  have  been  viewed  as  representatives 
of  a  species  with  the  name  of  Fal<eosyops  Junius. 

The  measurements  of  the  teeth  in  comparison  with  those  of  P.  indudosus 
are  as  follows : 


Space  occupied  by  the  last  premolar  and  molars 

Space  occupied  by  the  molars > 

Breadth  of  last  premolar 

Thickness  of  last  premolar 

Breadth  of  first  molar 

Breadth  of  second  molar 

Breadth  of  third  molar 

Thickness  of  third  molar  at  middle 


PiiiiEosyops 

Palyosyops 

JUUIUS. 

paludosus. 

Lilies. 

Lines. 

48 

55 

39i 

■10 

8 

9 

54 

«i 

10 

12^ 

12 

15 

17 

19 

7 

9i 

LIMNOHYUS. 

This  genus  was  originally  named  by  Professor  Marsh,  in  a  communication 
published  in  the  American  Journal  of  Science  for  August,  1872,  and  was 
applied  to  Paleeosyops  under  the  misapprehension  that  this  genus  had  not 
been  distinguished  by  the  possession  of  one  or  two  cones  to  the  inner  part  of 
the  crown  of  the  last  upper  molar  tooth.  As  it  was  as  cleai-ly  demonstrated 
as  the  nature  of  the  specimens  would  admit,  that  the  last  upper  molars  of 
8  G 


58 

Palasosyops  possessed  l)iii  a  single  cone  to  llic  imier  part  of  the  crown,  the 
name  subsequently  proposed  by  Professor  Marsli  on  account  of  this  character- 
istic was  untenable.  Under  these  circumstances,  though  I  previously  viewed 
the  difference  as  simply  specific,  I  would  adopt  the  generic  nameof  Limnohyus 
lor  those  forms  of  Pakeosyops,  as  recognized  by  the  general  constitution  of 
the  teeth,  in  which  the  last  upper  molars  have  two  cones  to  the  inner  part  of 
the  crown. 

Fig.  13,  Plate  XXIII,  represents  an  upper  molar  tooth,  apparently  the  fii'st 
of  the  series  of  true  molars,  resembling  in  form  the  corresponding  teeth  of 
Palceosyops  paludosus.  Tlie  enamel  of  the  tooth  is,  however,  comparatively 
smooth,  a  condition  which  is  clearly  independent  of  its  age,  as  the  tooth  is 
but  moderately  worn.  As  a  considerable  degree  of  variation  is  observed  in 
the  extent  of  wrinkling  of  the  enamel  of  the  teeth  of  Palceosyops  imludosus, 
independent  of  wearing,  it  is  not  improbable  the  specimen  may  pertain  to 
an  individual  variety  of  the  same,  though  it  prol)ably  niay  indicate  anotiier 
species. 

The  specimen  was  found  by  Dr.  Corson  in  association  with  the  large  tusks 
originally  referred  to  Uintamastix  atrox,  described  in  a  later  chapter,  and 
represented  in  Figs.  1  to  3,  Plate  XXV. 

Since  wi-iting  the  description  of  the  smooth,  enameled  molar  tooth,  Pro- 
fessor Marsh,  who  has  inspected  the  specimen,  informs  me  that  it  pertains  to 
the  same  animal  he  has  described  under  the  name  of  Palaosyops  laticeps, 
(Am.  Jour.  Sc,  Aug.,  1872.)  As  this  is  stated  to  have  four  lobes  to  the 
crown  of  the  last  upper  molar,  for  reasons  already  given,  it  would  belong  to 
the  genus  Limnohyus. 

Fig.  8,  Plate  XXIV,  represents  the  crown  of  an  ujiper  molar  tooth,  which 
was  found,  together  with  some  small  fragments  of  other  molars,  both  upper 
and  lower,  by  Dr.  Corson  on  the  buttes "of  Dry  Creek  Cailon.  The  specimen 
I  supposed  to  belong  to  a  small  s])ecies  of  Pateosyops,  and  so  referred  it, 
under  the  name  of  P.  hiimUlfi,  in  a  letter  to  the  Academy,  published  in 
its  Proceedings  for  July  30,  1872.  Under  the  impression  that  it  was 
perhaps  the  last  tooth  of  the  series,  in  view  of  the  distinction  suggested  by 
Professor  Marsh  between  Palaeosyops  and  Limnohyus,  I  subsequently 
ascribeil  it  to  the  latter.  Professor  Marsh  informs  me  that  he  has  a  number 
of  specimens  which  lead  him  to  regard  the  tooth  as  pertaining  to  the  tempo- 
rary series  of  Palaeosyops. 


59 

HYRACHYUS. 

An  extinct  genus  of  odd-toed  pachyderms,  under  the  above  name,  was 
originally  inferred  from  specimens  of  fossils  obtained  during  Professor  Hay- 
den's  exploration  in  Wyoming,  in  1870.  One  of  the  specimens,  represented 
in  Fig.  11,  Plate  II,  consists  of  the  greater  portion  of  a  ramus  of  the  lower 
jaw,  without  teeth,  found  on  Smith's  Fork  of  Green  River.  The  other  speci- 
men, represented  in  Fig  12,  consists  of  a  lower-jaw  fragment,  witli  several 
teetli,  of  a  young  animal,  from  Black's  Fork  of  Green  River. 

Hyrachyus  is  closely  related  with  the  extinct  tapiroid  genus  Lophiodon,  the 
remains  of  which  belong  to  the  early  Tertiary  formation  of  Europe.  In  a  less 
degree,  also,  it  is  related  with  the  rhinoceros-like  Hyracodon  of  the  Mauvaises 
Terres  of  White  River,  Dakota.  Among  living  animals,  it  is  most  nearly 
allied  to  the  tapir,  and  more  remotely  with  the  rhinoceros. 

The  dental  series  of  the  true  Lophiodon,  if  the  L.  isselense  of  Issel, 
France,  be  viewed  as  the  type  of  the  genus,  or  of  Tapirotherium,  as  it  had 
been  previously  named  by  De  Blain.'ille,  consists  of  three  iucisors,  a  canine, 
three  premolars,  and  three  molars.  The  living  tapir  at  maturity  has  one  pre- 
molar more  to  the  upper  series. 

In  one  species  of  Hyrachyus  at  maturity  there  are  four  premolars  to  the 
series  above  and  below,  as  in  Hyracodon.  Apparently,  in  a  second  species 
there  are  four  premolars  in  the  upper  series,  and  three  in  the  lower,  as  in  the 
tapir. 

The  last  lower  molar  of  Lophiodon  has  a  trilobate  crown.  In  Hyrachyus, 
as  in  the  tapir,  it  has  a  bilobed  crown. 

The  crowns  of  the  lower  molars  are  intermediate  in  character  with  those 
of  Lophiodon  and  Hyracodon. 

The  upper  molars  of  Hyrachyus  closely  resemble  those  of  Lophiodon.  In 
both  genera  the  upper  back  two  premolars  have  a  single  lobe  to  the  inner 
part  of  the  crown  representing  the  inner  pair  of  lobes  of  the  crowns  of  the 
succeeding  molars  in  a  connate  condition.  In  Lophiodon  a  ridge  proceeds 
from  the  inner  lobe  of  the  crown  of  the  premolars  mentioned  to  the  antero- 
external  lobe.  In  Hyrachyus,  in  the  corresponding  teeth,  a  pair  o£  ridges 
proceed  from  the  inner  lobe  of  the  crown  to  both  the  outer  lobes. 

The  lower  jaw  of  Hyrachyus  has  nearly  the  form  and  construction  of  that 
of  the  tapir. 


60 

Hyrachyus  agrarius. 

This  species,  originally  inJicatcd  aiul  named  from  tlie  specimen  repre- 
sented in  Fig.  11,  Plate  II,  consisting  of  a  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw  without 
teeth,  we  have  now  the  opportunity  of  illustrating  by  many  well-preserved 
and  more  characteristic  specimens.  Most  of  these  were  collected  by  Dr.  J. 
Van  A.  Carter,  during  the  last  summer,  on  Henry's  Fork  of  Green  River, 
near  Lodge-Pole  Trail,  at  Bridger  Butte,  and  other  localities  in  the  vicinity  of 
Fort  Bridger,  Wyoming.  A  few  others  were  detained  by  Dr.  Joseph  K. 
Corson,  from  Grizzly  Buttes,  Wyoming. 

The  specimen  represented  in  Fig.  12,  Plate  II,  being  one  of  those  upon 
whicli  the  genus  Hyrachyus  was  originally  proposed,  was  referred  to  another 
species  from  the  former  one,  with  the  name  of  Hyrachyus  agrestis.  This  I  now 
regard  as  of  the  same  species.  The  specimen,  a  lower-jaw  fragment,  belonged 
to  a  young  animal,  which  still  retained  its  temporary  teeth.  Of  these,  the 
fossil  contains  the  first  premolar,  the  fangs  of  the  succeeding  two,  and  the 
molar  tooth.  Behind  this  the  first  molar  of  the  permanent  series  is  inclosed 
within  the  jaw. 

Professor  Marsh  has  described  remains  apparently  of  the  same  animal 
under  the  name  of  Lophiodon  Bairdianus.  The  specimens,  which  he  observes 
are  among  the  most  common  of  the  mammalian  fossils  of  the  Wyoming  Ter- 
tiary, were  found  at  various  localities  near  Fort  Bridger,  and  also  on  the 
White  River,  in  Eastern  Utah. 

The  dental  series  of  Hijrachyus  ngrar'ms,  in  the  mature  condition,  consists 
of  three  incisors,  a  canine,  four  premolars,  and  three  molars,  in  both  jaws. 

A  well-preserved  series  of  upper  molar  teeth,  considerably  worn,  is  repre- 
sented in  Figs.  9  and  10,  Plate  IV,  from  a  specimen  discovered  by  Dr.  Car- 
ter near  Lodge-Pole  Trail,  about  eleven  miles  from  Fort  Bridger.  Fig.  11, 
of  the  same  plate,  represents  an  upper  second  molar,  which  was  obtained  by 
Dr.  Carter  on  Henry's  Fork  of  Green  River. 

Of  the  upper  molars,  or  true  molars,  the  middle  one  is  the  largest,  and  the 
others  are  nearly  equal  in  size.  Four  principal  lobes  enter  into  the  constitu- 
tion of  iheir  crown,  which  is  inclosed  by  a  basal  ridge,  except  externally,  and 
at  the. most  prominent  portion  of  the  inner  lobes  internally.  Of  the  outer 
lobes,  which  are  conjoined,  the  posterior  is  the  wider  and  is  pyramidal;  the 
anterior  is  the  more  prominent  externally  and  is  conical.  Tliis  is  also  strength- 
ened in  front  by  a  large  conical  buttress  continuous  with  the  comparatively 


61 

wide  anterior  l)asal  ridge  of  the  crown.  In  tlic  last  molar  the  jiosterior  of 
the  outer  lol>cs  is  proportionately  less  well  developed  than  in  the  molars  in 
advance.  The  inner  lobes  of  the  crown  are  conical  internally,  and  are  extended 
obliquely  outward  so  as  to  form  ridges  continuous  with  the  fore  part  of  the 
outer  lobes.  The  oblique  valley  separating  the  inner  lobes  is  closed  exter- 
nally by  the  conjunction  of  the  outer  lobes.  A  wide,  angular  recess  occupies 
the  interval  of  the  posterior  lobes  of  the  crown  and  the  posterior  basal  ridge. 

In  the  unworn  or  moderately  worn  condition  of  the  molars,  as  seen  in  Fig.  11, 
Plate  IV,  a  narrow  but  conspicuous  ridge  or  fold  is  observed  projecting  from 
the  antero-external  lobe  into  the  median  valley  of  the  ci-own.  In  the 
worn  condition  of  the  molars,  as  seen  in  Fig.  10,  c  to  g,  they  exhibit  a 
Iract  of  exposed  dentine  extending  along  the  summits  of  the  outer  lol)es 
including  the  abutment  in  front,  and  prolonged  inw^ardly  in  two  pouch-like 
extensions  upon  the  summits  of  the  inner  lobes. 

The  upper  premolars  not  only  exhibit  from  behind  forward  a  successive 
diminution  in  size,  but  also  a  reduction  to  greater  simplicity.  The  latter  con- 
dition is  induced  through  connation  and  disappearance  of  constituent  elements 
as  they  are  observed  to  exist  in  the  back  teeth.  Thus  if  we  compare  the 
back  two  premolars,  Fig.  10,  c,  d,  with  the  molars  behind,  it  will  appear  tliat 
the  most  striking  difference  is  due  to  the  connation  internally  of  the  inner 
lobes.  From  this  arrangement  the  premolars  appear  to  have  a  single  loi>e  to 
the  inner  part  of  the  crown,  from  which  a  pair  of  ridges  proceed  to  join  the 
outer  lobes.  A  central  pit  represents  the  median  valley  opening  internally  in 
the  crown  of  the  molars.  The  basal  ridge  extends  around  the  inner  part  of 
the  crown. 

The  abutment  so  conspicuous  at  the  antero-external  angle  of  Ihc  crown  of 
the  molars  is  successively  reduced  forward  in  the  premolars  and  disappears  in 
the  anterior  two. 

In  the  crown  of  the  second  premolar.  Fig.  10,  h,  the  outer  lol^es  are  more 
connate  than  in  those  behind,  and  the  inner  lobe  appears  more  isolated  from 
the  absence  of  the  intervening  ridges. 

The  crown  of  the  first  premolar,  Fig.  10,  a,  about  half  the  size  of^that  of 
the  tooth  behind,  is  conoidal  with  an  oval  base.  For  the  most  part  it  is 
homologous  with  the  outer  lobes  of  the  other  premolars  in  a  completely  con- 
nate condition.  A  small  offset  internally  is  a  ruiliment  of  llie  inner  lobe  of 
Ihe  succeeding  premolar. 


62 

A  hiisal  ridge  exists  at  the  outer  back  part  of  the  crown  of  tlie  seconcl  pre- 
molar, and,  less  produced,  exists  in  the  same  position  in  the  third.  No  ridge 
occupies  the  inner  prominence  of  tlie  inner  lobe  of  the  second  premolar. 

A  specimen  of  an  upper  left  last  premolar,  found  at  Grizzly  Buttes  by  Dr. 
Corson,  is  represented  in  Fig.  12,  Plate  IV.  It  is  larger  than  in  the  entire  series 
of  Fig.  10  and  is  less  worn.  It  exhibits  a  basal  ridge  externally  interrupted 
at  the  middle ;  and  internally  the  ridge  is  also  interrupted  or  nearly  obsolete 
at  the  middle.  The  posterior  ridge  or  fold  between  the  inner  and  postero- 
external lobes,  though  smaller,  is  more  defined  from  the  lobes  than  the  ante- 
rior I'idge.  The  latter  appears  rather  as  a  pi'olongation  of  the  inner  lobe  to 
the  fore  jiart  of  the  base  of  the  antero-external  lobe.  The  posterior  ridge  has 
the  appearance  of  an  introduced  piece  defined  from  the  lobes  by  consti'ictions 
or  grooves.  The  arrangement  is  badly  represented  by  the  artist;  nor  is  it 
obvious  if  it  existed  iii  the  corresponding  more  worn  tooth  of  the  series  (jf 
Fig.  10. 

In  a  much  mutilated  specimen,  obtained  by  Dr.  Corson  at  Grizzly  Buttes, 
containing  the  remains  of  the  last  two  premolars  and  succeeding  two  premo- 
lars, the  basal  ridge  is  better  developed  at  the  inner  part  of  the  crown  than 
in  any  of  the  preceding.  The  last  premolar  exhibits  the  same  condition  of 
the  posterior  ridge  intervening  to  the  internal  and  postero-external  lobes  of 
the  crown  as  that  described  in  the  isolated  tooth.  The  same  tooth,  barely 
worn,  exhibits  the  summit  of  the  inner  lobe  of  the  crown  slightly  divided  into 
two  points,  so  that  it  presents  a  less  degree  of  connation  than  in  the  preceding 
specimens. 

The  upper  molars  and  premolars,  except  the  first  one,  are  inserted  by  three 
fangs,  of  which  the  inner  one  is  a  connate  pair;  the  connation  being  most 
complete  in  the  premolars.  The  first  premolar  has  two  fangs.  The  space 
occupied  by  the  upper  molar  series  is  about  3|  inches. 

Fig.  13,  Plate  IV,  represents  a  specimen,  found  by  Dr.  Carter,  in  company 
with  the  upper  molar  teeth  of  Figs.  9  and  10,  and  evidently  pertaining  to  the 
same  individual.  The  specimen  consists  of  the  anterior  extremity  of  the 
lower  jaw,  retaining  the  incisive  alveoli,  the  canines,  and  on  one  side  the  four 
premolars.  A  view  of  the  triturating  surfaces  of  the  latter  is  given  in  Fig. 
14.  Figs.  15  and  16  represent  a  second  molar,  and  Fig.  18  an  incisor  from 
(he  same  individual. 

Fig  25,  Plate  XX,  was  drawn   from  a  specimen  consisting  of  the  greater 


63 

part,  of  a  lower  jaw,  including  both  rami,  obtained  l)y  Dr.  Carter,  at  Bridgcr 
Butte,  seven  miles  west  of  Fort  Bridger.  The  left  ramus  contains  the  pos- 
terior three  premolars  and  the  succeeding  two  molars,  of  which  a  view  of  tiic 
triturating  surfaces  is  given  in  Fig.  26. 

The  lower  molars,  including  the  last  one,  in  H)/rachyus  agrarius  have  all 
bi-lobed  crowns.  These  are  oblong  square,  and  bounded  by  a  basal  ridge  in 
Iront,  behind,  and  in  a  more  or  less  interrupted  condition  externally.  Tlie 
constituent  lobes  have  somewhat  curved  rectangular  summits  as  in  Hyracodon 
and  rhinoceros.  The  summit  of  the  anterior  lobe  curves  forward  and  inward, 
and  becomes  continuous  with  the  basal  ridge  of  the  fore  jiart  of  the  crown. 
As  the  acute  summits  are  worn,  tracts  of  dentine  become  exposed 
crossing  the  teeth.  In  the  progress  of  attrition  the  expanding  dentinal  tracts 
extend  in  an  irregular  L-like  manner,- and  finally  the  contiguous  tracts  of  each 
tooth  become  continuous,  as  in  rhinoceros  at  the  same  stage  of  wear. 

The  crowns  of  the  premolars  present  the  same  essential  constitution  as 
those  of  the  molars,  with  the  constituent  lobes,  successively,  from  behind 
forward,  becoming  more  reduced  or  rudimental.  The  posterior  lobe  l>ecomes 
proportionately  more  reduced  than  the  anterior,  and  in  the  first  premolar  has 
disappeared. 

The  crown  of  the  last  premolar  resembles  those  of  the  molars,  with  the 
])osterior  lobe  proportionately  more  reduced  than  the  anterior  one. 

The  crown  of  the  third  premolar,  in  the  speciinen  represented  in  Fig.  25, 
Plate  XX,  has  the  same  form  as  in  the  last  premolar,  and  is  simply  reduced 
in  size.  In  the  specimen  represented  in  Fig.  13,  Plate  IV,  the  tooth  looks 
ditferent,  from  the  obfique  ridge  or  summit  of  the  anterior  lobe  of  the  crown 
as  existing  in  the  former,  being  contracted  in  this  into  a  conical  and  some- 
what more  elevated  point.  This  gives  such  a  remarkable  diilerence  to  these 
teeth  in  the  two  specimens,  that,  had  they  been  tbund  isolated,  without  a 
knowledge  of  their  collocation,  they  would  have  been  attributed  to  dilferent 
genera  of  animals. 

The  anterior  two  premolars  have  an  oval  crown  elevated  into  a  median 
conical  point  and  presenting  offsets  behind  and  in  front,  in  which  may  be 
detected  the  rudiments  of  the  posterior  lobe  and  anterior  extension  of  the 
anterior  lobe  of  the  better  developed  crowns  of  the  teeth  behind. 

All  the  lower  premolars,  as  well  as  the  molars,  are  inserted  by  a  pair  of 
fangs.  The  space  occupied  l)y  the  lower  molar  series  in  several  specimens 
ranges  from  3  inches  and  .'i  lines  io  o%  inches. 


64 

The  inferior  canine  teeth  are  quite  like  those  of  the  tapir  in  appearance. 
They  curve  upward  and  forward,  with  a  slight  inclination  outward.  The 
crown  is  laterally  compressed  conical,  subacute  in  front  and  behind,  but  worn 
in  both  these  positions  in  the  specimen  under  examination. 

The  upper  canines  are  unknown,  unless  the  specimen  represented  in  Fig. 
17,  Plate  IV,  is  one.  This  vvas  found  at  Grizzly  Buttes  by  Dr.  Corson,  in 
association  with  some  upper  premolars  of  Hyrachyus  ;  all  of  which  look  as  if 
they  had  belonged  to  the  same  individual.  The  crown  of  this  Sjiecimen  of 
an  upper  canine  is  short,  and  worn  off  to  a  considerable  extent  at  its  fore 
part.  It  is  compressed  conical,  and  lias  the  inner  and  outer  surfaces  defined 
l)y  an  acute  ridge  posteriorly.  The  fang  is  double  the  length  of  the  crown, 
and  is  laterally  compressed. 

The  incisor  tooth,  represented  in  Fig.  18,  appears  to  be  the  second  of 
the  series  of  the  lower  jaw.  It  resembles  the  corresponding  tooth  of  the 
tapir.     Its  chisel-like  crown  is  worn  off  at  the  cutting  edge. 

No  characteristic  portions  of  the  upper  jaw  of  Hyrachyus  have  come  under 
our  notice.  In  one  specimen  tire  infra-orbital  foramen  is  observed  to  occupy 
a  position  above  the  third  premolar. 

The  lower  jaw  resembles,  in  its  form  and  proportions,  that  of  the  Hyraco- 
don  and  the  tapir.  The  anterior  extremity,  in  the  construction  of  the  chin, 
the  contraction  between  the  position  of  the  canines  and  molar  series,  and 
other  features,  repeats  the  condition  observed  in  the  tapir.  A  similar  wide 
hiatus  separates  the  canines  from  the  molar  teeth.  The  free  border  of  the 
hiatus,  upward  of  an  inch  in  length,  is  concave  fore  and  aft,  and  acute. 

The  body  of  the  lower  jaw  is  less  robust  or  thick,  in  relation  with  its 
depth,  than  in  the  tapir.  It  is  also  less  convex  externally,  and  at  the 
base  fore  and  aft.  The  outer  surface,  in  comparison,  appears  quite 
vertical. 

The  ascending  portion  of  the  ramus  rises  vertically  at  its  fore  border,  and 
is  deeply  impressed  on  the  outer  surface  just  back  of  the  latter. 

The  condyle  projects  less  externally  and  more  posteriorly  than  in  the  tapir. 
Its  articular  surface  is  more  flat,  and  in  a  less  degree  inclined  inwardly. 

In  the  specimen  represented  in  Fig.  13,  Plate  IV,  five  small  mental 
foramina  are  observed,  in  a  row  extending  from  the  position  of  the  third  pre- 
molar to  thtit  of  the  canine  tooth.  In  the  specimen  represented  in  Fig.  25,  Plate 
XX,  a  large  mental  foramen  i.s  situated   below  the  intervul  of  the  third  and 


65 


fourth  premolars;  and  in  advance  of  tliis  several  small  ones  exist.  In  llie 
specimen  represented  in  Fig.  11,  Plate  II,  the  mental  foramen  is  situated 
below  the  first  premolar. 

Measurements  from  several  specimens  of  lower  jaws  of  Hyrachyus  agrarius 
are  as  follows : 


Leugth  of  space  occupied  by  the  molar  teeth 

Distance  from  incisive  alveoli  to  first  premolar 

Length  of  hiatus  between  canine  and  first  premolar 

Depth  of  jaw  below  last  molar 

Depth  of  jaw  below  last  i>remolar 

Breadth  of  jaw  at  caniue  alveoli 

Breadth  of  jaw  below  hiatus 

Length  of  symphysis 


LiDes.         Liues 


25 
13 


14 
12 

28 


42 
24 
13 
IS 
15 
13 
10.J 


Liucs. 


44 


20 
10 


Measurements  of  upper  molar  teeth  are  as  follows: 

luchcs.  Lines. 

Length  of  the  entire  upper  molar  series 3        9 

Length  of  series  of  premolars • 1        8.1- 

Length  of  series  of  molars 2        1 ', 


Diameter 
Diameter 
Diameter 
Diameter 
Diameter 
Diameter 
Diameter 


of  first  premolar . .  , 
of  second  premolar 
of  third  premolar . . 
of  fourth  premolar . 

of  first  molar 

of  second  molar  . . . 
of  third  molar 


Comparative  measurements  of  two  upper  last  premolars  are  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  in  both 7 

Transverse  diameter  in  one 8^ 

III  the  other 9 

Measurements  of  lower  molar  teeth  are  as  follows  : 


Length  of  the  entii'e  lower  molar  series . 


Length  of  series  of  premolars. 
Length  of  series  of  molars . . . . 


Lines. 


20 


Lines. 


42 
19 
24 


Lines. 


44 
20 

2U 


9g 


66 


Foro  aud  aft. 


Diameter  of  first  premolar . . 
Diameter  of  second  premolar 
Diameter  of  third  premolar. 
Diameter  of  fourth  premolar 

Diameter  of  first  molar 

Diameter  of  second  molar .  . . 
Diameter  of  third  molar. . . . 


Lines. 

^ 

G 
Gh 


Lines. 


u- 


5^ 
8i 


Transverse. 


IjUK'S. 

2.i 

u 


Tj'uiv 


2i- 

3i 

4 

5 

5 


Hijrackyus  agrari>(.s  was  al:)uut  the  size  of  the  coininoii  collared  peccary, 
Dicotyles  torquatus. 

HYRACHYUfcj    liXIMIUS. 

A  .supposed  larger  species  of  Hyrachyus  lluui  H.  dgrarius  is  interred  IVoin 
several  specimens,  consisting  of  small  fragments  of  a  lower  jaw  with  a  tooth 
and  portions  of  others.  These  were  obtained  by  Dr.  Carter  on  Henry's  Fork 
of  Green  River. 

The  best  and  most  cliaraeteristic  specimen  is  represented  in  Figs.  19,  20, 
Plate  IV,  consisting  of  a  lower-jaw  fragment  containing  the  last  premolar  and 
portion  of  the  first  molar  much  worn.  Both  the  teeth  and  the  jaw  agree  in 
form  with  the  corresponding  parts  in  Hyrachyus  agrarius  and  differ  only  in 
size.  The  specimen  also  agrees  with  the"  corresponding  ])art  of  Lophiodon 
sufficiently  to  belong  to  the  same  genus,  so  that  until  more  amjile  material  is 
discovered  it  must  remain  uncertain  whether  it  really  i)ertains  to  Hyrachyus. 

Comparative  measurements  are  as  follows : 


H.  oxiiiiius.    H. ;nrrariii.s. 


Lines. 


Depth  of  jaw  at  last  premolar 

Thickness  of  jaw  at  last  premolar 

Diameter  fore  and  aft  of  last  premolar. 
Diameter  transversely  of  last  premolar 

Diameter  trausversly  of  first  molar 

Diameter  transversely  of  second  molar. 


".s. 

Lii 

r.s. 

IS 

^^ 

9 

7 

7 

53 

5.> 

4 

Gi 

• 

5 

7 

51 

Figs.  9,  10,  Plate  XXVl,  represent  a  tooth  recently  obtained  by  Dr.  Cai^- 
tcr  on  the  buttes  of  Dry  Creek.  It  would  apjiear,  from  its  proportions,  to  l)e 
(lii^lcfl  lower  ])eiinltimate  molar  of //y)Y?''////WA-  czimiu^.     It  is  a  nearly   un- 


fi7 

worn  and  perfect  specimen,  and  agrees  in  its  anatomical  characters  with  the 
corresponding  tooth  of  H.  agrarlus.  The  crown  measures  an  inch  antero- 
jiosteriorly  and  7^  lines  transversely. 

The  specimens  above  described  indicate  an  animal  about  tlie  size  of  the 
common  American  tapir. 

HVRACHYUS    MODESTUS. 

Under  the  impression  that  teeth  of  like  form  with  those  of  Hyrachyits 
agrarius,  from  the  Bridger  Tertiary  formation,  pertain  to  the  same  genns,  I 
now  view  the  tooth  represented  in  Fig.  13,  Plate  II,  which  I  previously 
referred  to  Lopkiodon  modestus,  as  belonging  to  Hyrachyus.  The  specimen 
was  obtained  during  Professor  Hayden's  exploration  of  1870,  on  Smith's  Fork 
of  Green  River,  near  Fort  Bridger. 

The  tooth  is  a  first  or  second  up])er  molar,  and  differs  in  size  and  propor- 
tion from  the  corresponding  teeth  of  Hyrachyus  agrarius  sufficiently  to  indi- 
cate a  smaller  species.  The  only  other  diflerence  observable,  one,  however, 
which  may  prove  not  to  be  constant  in  additional  specimens,  is  in  the  internal 
surface  of  the  antero-internal  lobe  of  the  crown,  being  strongly  wrinkled  in- 
stead of  being  elevated  in  a  single  conspicuous  fold  as  in  H.  agrarius. 

The  comjiarative  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows: 

H.  agrarius. 


Lilies. 

Diameter  fore  and  aft  of  second  upper  molar 7  9 

Diameter  transversely  of  second  upper  molar Of  10 

Hyrachyus  modestus  was  about  a  third  less  in  size  than  H.  agrarius. 

Hyrachyus  nanus. 

Portions  of  two  lower  jaws  I  have  referred  to  a  small  species  of  Hyrachyus 
with  the  above  name.  One  of  the  specimens  was  obtained  at  Lodge-Pole 
Trail,  by  Dr.  Carter;  the  other,  represented  in  Fig.  14,  Plate  II,  and  Fig.  42, 
Plate  VI,  was  found  at  Grizzly  Buttes,  by  Dr.  Corson. 

In  both  specimens,  which  belonged  to  animals  at  maturity  but  not  advanced 
in  life,  the  number  of  teeth  in  the  molar  series  is  six,  or  one  less  than  in 
Hyrachyus,  and  the  same  number  as  in  Lojihiodon  and  the  tapir.  The  last 
molar,  however,  has  a  bilobed  crown   as  in   the  latter,   ))ul   the   premolars,  in 


68 


ihcir  less  degree  of  (Icvelopinent  in  comparison  wilh  the  molars,  are  more 
like  those  of  Lophiodon. 

The  suppression  of  an  anterior  premolar  may  jierhaps  he  regarded  as  a  less 
important  generic  character  than  the  others  which  have  been  indicated  as 
separating  Hyrachyus  from  Lophiodon  and  Tapirus.  Under  the  circum- 
stances, notwithstanding  the  reduction  in  the  number  of  premolars,  I  view 
the  two  jaw-specimens  above  indicated  as  pertaining  to  Hyrachyus. 

Professor  Marsh  has  described  several  specimens,  from  Grizzly  Buttes, 
under  the  name  of  hopModon  nanus,  which  I  suspect  to  belong  to  the  same 
animal  as  the  lower-jaw  fragments  above  indicated.  Pie  observes  that  the 
most  characteristic  of  the  specimens  is  a  right  upper  jaw  containing  a  series 
of  four  premolars  and  three  molars.  If,  then,  this  really,  belongs  to  the  same 
animal,  it  would  give  with  the  lower-jaw  specimens,  as  the  formula  of  the 
molar  series,  seven  teeth  above  and  six  below,  as  in  the  tapir.  The  upper 
]u-cmolars,  however,  jiresent  a  greater  amount  of  difference  from  the  molars 
than  in  the  latter,  the  difference  being  mainly  diic  to  a  less  degree  of  develop- 
ment of  the  premolars  and  in  the  connation  of  the  inner  lobes  of  their 
crowns. 

The  molar  teeth  and  the  portion  of  the  jaw  containing  them  are  almost  repe- 
titions of  form  of  the  corresponding  parts  in  Hyrachyus  agrarius.  The  men- 
tal foramen  is  situated  below  the  first  premolar.  Hyrachyus  nanus  was 
about  half  the  size  of  //.  agrarius. 

Measurements  from  two  lower-jaw  specimens  areas  follows: 

Space  occupied  by  the  complete  series  of  molar  teeth 2  .inches. 

Space  occupied  by  the  premolars 93  lines. 

Space  occupied  by  the  molars 14    lines. 

Depth  of  jaw  below  last  premolar 10    lines. 


Diameter  of  llrst  premolar 

Diameter  of  second  premolar. 

Diameter  of  last  premolar 

Diameter  of  fir.st  molar 

Diameter  of  second  molar .    . . . 
Diameter  of  last  molar. 


Fore  and 

nil. 

Transverse. 

Lines. 

Lines. 

2i 

3i 

-h 

n 

"4 

4 

3 

4.1 

H 

H 

H 

Fig.  11,  Plate  XXVI,  represents  the  greater   part  of  the  right  ramus  of 
the  lower  jaw  of  Hyrachyus  nanus,  which   I  found,  together  with  a  fra'^mcnt 


G9 

oC  tlic  opposite  side  and  several  other  bones  ot  the  skeleton,  near  the  Lodge- 
Pole  Trail,  crossing  Dr}'  Creek  Valley.  The  specimen  was  found  in  part  ex- 
posed and  partially  imbedded  in  the  indurated  clay  of  a  bntte,  in  company 
with  quite  a  profusion  of  well-preserved  shells  of  Helix  tvi/omingensis. 

The  jaw  resembles  in  its  form  that  of  Hyrachyus  agrarius,  and  also  that 
of  the  recent  tapir.  It  contained  a  series  of  six  molars,  of  which  it  retains 
the  back  four..  The  molars  are  separated  by  a  wide  hiatus  from  a  continuous 
arch  of  alveoli,  for  the  accommodation  of  the  incisors  and  canines,  which  corres- 
pond in  number  with  those  of  the  tapir. 

The  depth  of  the  jaw  is  rather  less  than  in  the  fragments  prciviously 
described,  while  the  dimensions  of  the  molar  series  is  nearly  the  same.  The 
measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  Ibllows : 

Lines. 

Length  of  space  from  incisive  alveoli  to  back  of  last  molar 42 

Leugtli  of  space  occupied  by  f lie  molar  scries 24 

Length  of  space  occupied,  by  the  true  molars 14i 

Autero  posterior  diameter  of  last  molar 41 

Length  of  symphysis  ... IG 

Length  of  hiatus  in  advance  of  molars 13 

Depth  of  jaw  below  uiolars 9J 

An  upper-jaw  fragment,  recently  sent  to  me  by  Dr.  Carter,  I  suppose  to 
pertain  to  Hyrachyus  iianiis.  It  contains  the  fangs  of  the  anterior  three 
premolars,  and  the  entire  last  one,  which  is  represented  in  Figs.  21,  22,  Plate 
XXVII,  magnified  two  diameters.  This  premolar  resembles  the  corresponding 
tooth  o{  H.  agrarius,  but  the  ridge  in  the  latter,  w^hich  represents  the  postero- 
internal lobe  in  the  true  molars,  is  reduced  to  the  smallest  rudiment. 

The  space  occupied  by  the  four  premolars    measures   11^    lines.     The 
'  breadth  of  the  last  premolar  is  3.2  lines  ;  the  width  transversely  is  4  lines. 

LOPHIOTHERIUM. 

LOPHIOTHERIUM    SYLVATICUM. 

The  genus  Lophiotherium  was  proposed  by  Gervais,  from  some  fragments 
of  several  lower  jaws  with  molar  teeth,  which  were  found  in  association  with 
remains  of  true  Palseotheria,  in  a  formation  of  France  which  he  regards  as 
belonging  to  the  upper  Eocene  Tertiary.  The  genus  is  viewed  as  a  tapiroid 
pachyderm  closely  allied  to  Lophiodon,  though  the  molar  teeth  appear  very 
unlike  those  of  the  latter. 

Daring  Professor  Ilayden's  exploration  of  1870,  a  specimen  was  found  on 


70 

Henry's  Forkof  Green  River,  which  appears  to  pertain  to  a  species  oi'Lophiothe- 
rium.  The  specimen,  represented  in  Fig.  33,  Plate  VI,  consists  of  a  lower- 
jaw  fragment  containing  the  last  premolar  and  the  first  and  last  true  molars 
— the  crown  of  the  intervening  true  molar  having  been  lost.  The  teeth 
appear  closely  to  resemble  in  form  and  constitution  those  of  LophiotherUan 
cei-vulum,  as  represented  in  Plate  II  of  Gervais's  Zoologie  et  PaUontologie 
franQaises.  The  only  apparent  difference,  which,  nevertheless,  is  an  important 
generic  one,  if  it  really  exists,  is  the  division  of  the  summit  of  the  antero- 
internal  lobe  of  the  crown  of  the  teeth  into  two  points  in  the  American  fossil. 

The  anterior  teeth,  Fig.  34,  of  the  latter  have  oblong  quadrate  crowns, 
slightly  narrower  at  the  fore  part  and  otherwise  alike  in  form.  They  are 
quadrilobate,  tlie  lol^es  being  tri-laterally  pyramidal  and  connate  at  base. 

The  last  molar.  Fig.  35,  is  prolonged  behind  in  the  manner  so  common  in  allied 
animals  of  the  same  order.  This  prolongation  is  mainly  due  to  the  addition  of 
a  fifth  lobe  to  the  crown,  which  is  narrowed  posteriorly  in  the  reverse  direc- 
tion to  the  teeth  in  advance. 

A  strong  basal  ridge  incloses  the  crowns  of  the  teeth,  excepting  internally. 
In  the  last  molar  it  is  less  well  developed  and  does  not  exist  posteriorly.  The 
constituent  lobes  of  the  crowns  are  nearly  of  uniform  size.  The  antero-in- 
ternal  lobe,  as  before  intimated,  has  its  summit  divided  into  two  points.  The 
division  extends  so  short  a  distance  that  it  w<nild  be  early  obliterated  from 
the  wearing  of  the  teeth  in  the  trituration  of  the  food.  It  is  hardly  percepti- 
ble, even  in  the  unworn  condition  in  the  last  molar,  and  in  the  specimen  is 
most  distinct  in  the  first  true  molar.  As  a  character,  it  may  l)e  inferred  to  be 
most  obvious  in  the  anterior  two  true  molars,  and  less  so  in  the  premolars  of 
like_form  and  in  the  last  true  molar. 

The  postero-internal  lobe  of  the  crowns  has  a  simple  pointed  summit.  The 
inner  lobes  have  the  crescentoid  summit  declining  from  a  central  point  in- 
wardly, so  common  in  the  corresponding  teeth  of  allied  animals.  The  fore 
arm  of  the  summit  of  the  antero-ext'ernal  lobe  is  a  thick  ridge  curving  to  the 
base  of  the  antero-internal  lobe  in  front.  The  back  arm  is  a  short  ridge 
directed  inwardly  to  the  anterior  division  of  the  summit  of  the  antero-internal 
lobe.  The  fore  arm  of  the  summit  of  the  postero-exteinal  lobe  reaches  the 
middle  of  the  antero-internal  lobe.  The  back  arm  joins  the  posterior  basal 
ridge,  proiUicing  an  elevated  point  at  its  middle.     From  the  inner  side  of  the 


71 

same  lul)e  a  tliinl  but  less  conspicuous  ridge  extends  directly  to  the  loI)e 
within. 

In  the  last  molar  the  fifth  lobe  has  a  crescentoid  summit  declining  from  a 
median  point.  The  outer  arm  of  the  summit  joins  the  contiguous  arm  of  tlie 
lobe  in  advance,  and  the  inner  arm  joins  the  base  of  the  postero-internal  lobe. 

The  minutely  detailed  description  of  these  teeth,  and  the  same  may  be 
said  of  those  of  other  fossils,  is  essential  to  the  distinction  of  generic  characters. 

From  the  back  molars  of  Lophiodon,  those  of  Lophiotherium  especially 
differ  in  the  distinction  of  four  instead  of  two  lobes  to  the  crown  :  though  the 
two  lobes  in  the  teeth  of  Lophiodon  and  Tapirus  represent  the  four  of  Lo- 
phiotherium in  a  connate  condition. 

The  jaw-fragment  of  the  fossil  referred  to  Lophiotherium  srjlvatician  pre- 
sents nothing  peculiar.  The  outer  vertical  surface  is  slightly  convex,  and  the 
base  fore  and  aft  is  also  moderately  convex. 

The  measurements  of  the  fossil  are  as  follows  . 

Liucs. 

Depth  of  lower  jaw  below  middle  of  last  premolar 5;| 

Depth  of  lower  jaw  below  middle  of  last  true  molar '- Gi 

Anteroposterior  diameter  of  last  premolar - 3.^ 

Autero-posterior  diameter  of  first  true  molar 3^ 

Autero-posterior  diameter  of  second  true  molar 3iJ 

Autero-posterior  diameter  of  last  true  molar 5^ 

Transverse  diameter  of  last  premolar -'i 

Transverse  diameter  of  trne  molars 2J 

Should  the  duplication  of  the  summit  of  the  antero-internal  lobe   of   the 

crown  of  tiie  lower  back  molars  not  be  a  character  present  in  the  Lopliio- 

therimn  cervulum  of   France,  it  would   probably  be   a  concomitant  of  other 

characters  in  the  upper  teeth,  now  unknown  to  us,  which  would  distinguish 

the  American  animal  as  generically  distinct  from  Lophiotherium. 

.    In  the  American   Journal  of  Science  for   1871.  Professor  Marsh  notices 

some  remains,  from  Grizzly  Buttes,  which  be  attributes  to  a  species  about 

two-lhirds  the  size  of  the  fcjrmer,  and  names  it  Lojjhiotherium  BuUardi. 

TROGOSUS. 

Trogosus  castoridens. 

One  of  the  most  curious  of  the  extinct  mammals  of  the  Bridger  Tertiary 
fauna  is  an  odd-toed  pachyderm  about  the  size  of  the  larger  living  peccary, 
which,  with  the  usual  complement  of  molar  teeth,  was  apparently  devoid  of 
canines,  and  was  provided  with  a  large  pair  of  incisors  like  those  ol'  rodents. 


72 

The  singular  character  of  the  aiiunal  was  first  recognized  in  a  fossil  specimen; 
consisting  of  a  mutilated  lower  jaw,  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  in  the  vicinity 
of  Fort  Bridger,  and  sent  to  the  writer  in  the  spring  of  1871.  The  specimen, 
represented  in  Figs.  1  to  3,  Plate  V,  besides  the  two  large  incisors,  contains  the 
remains  of  most  of  the  molar  teeth,  but  none  in  an  entire  condition.  The 
best  preserved  is  the  second  molar  of  the  left  side,  and  this  is  so  much  worn 
as  to  have  the  distinctive  features  of  its  triturating  surfiice,  as  seen  in  Fig.  2, 
completely  obliterated. 

The  specimen  was  originally  described  in  the  proceedings  of  the  Academy 
of  Natural  Sciences  in  May,  lb71,  and  from  its  peculiarities  the  animal  to 
which  it  belonged  was  named  Trogosus  castoridens,  or  the  beaver-toothed 
gnawing  hog.  Professor  Marsh  had  previously  described  an  isolated  tooth, 
of  the  same  animal,  from  Grizzly  Buttes,  which  he  referred  to  a  species  of 
Palseosyops  with  the  name  of  P.  minor.  From  the  description,  I  supposed  it 
not  to  difler  from  P.  j)aludosus.  An  examination  of  the  specimen  has  satis- 
fied me  that  it  belonged  to  the*same  animal  as  the  jaw  referred  to  Trogosus. 

The  isolated  tooth  belonged  to  a  younger  animal,  and  is  not  so  worn  as  to 
have  the  characteristic  arrangement  of  its  masticating  surface  destroyed.  On 
seeing  it  I  was  struck  with  its  resemblance  to  anotlier  isolated  molar  tooth 
wliicli  I  had  formerly  described  under  the  name  Anchipjjodus  riparius.  This 
tooth  was  discovered  by  Dr.  Knieskern  in  a  Tertiary  formation,  supposed  to 
be  of  Eocene  age,  in  Monmouth  County,  New  Jersey.  It  was  given  to  Mr. 
T.  Conrad,  by  whom  it  was  ]5resented  to  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
of  Philadelphia.  The  same  formation  has  yielded  the  remains  of  a  peccary, 
an  Elotherium,  and  a  rhinoceros. 

A  comparison  of  the  tooth  of  the  New  Jersey  Anchippodus  with  the  cor- 
responding one  in  the  jaw-specimen  and  with  liie  isolated  molar,  would  appear 
to  indicate  that  the  Wyoming  fossils  belong  to  the  same  genus,  and  indeed 
the  teeth  are  sufficiently  alike  in  form  and  size  to  pertaiji  to  the  same  species. 
Should  further  discovery  prove  this  to  be  the  case,  it  would,  perhaps,  indi- 
cate the  contemporaneous  character  of  the  Bridger  Tertiary  foi-mation  of 
■Wyoming  and  that  of  Monmouth  County,  New  Jersey.  The  New  Jersey 
fossil,  in  its  general  appearance  of  color  and  condition,  so  closely  resembles 
the  Wyoming  fossils  that  it  would  readily  pass  for  one  of  them. 

It  is  by  no  means  positive  that  Trogosus  and.  Anchippodus  are  the  same, 


73 


fur  we  have  examples  enough  ul'  different  genera  having  the  lower  molars 
alike,  while  the  upper  ones  and  the  premolars  are  unlike. 

The  jaw  of  Trogosus  retains  evidences  of  the  existence  of  six  molar  teeth, 
and  there  may  have  been  another  small  premolar,  but  this  cannot  be  ascer- 
tained from  the  mutilated  condition  of  the  specimen.  The  first  of  the  series 
of  six  molar  teeth  approached  so  close  upon  the  lai-ge  incisor  as  to  leave  but 
a  small  interval  for  the  introduction  of  other  teeth. 

The  best  preserved  tooth  of  the  molar  sei'ies,  the  second  molar,  presents  a 
bilobed  crown,  in  which  the  anterior  lobe  is  the  longer  or  least  worn.  The 
triturating  surface,  represented  in  Fig.  2,  Plate  V,  exhibits  a  wide  tract  of 
exposed  dentine  with  a  yoke-like  outline  of  enamel.  Its  fore  and  aft  meas- 
urement is  9J  lines.     The  thickness  of  the  anterior  lobe  at  base  is  8  lines. 

In  the  less  worn  specimen  of  the  corresponding  tooth  described  by  Profes- 
sor Marsh,  he  gives  the  antero-posterior  diameter  as  10  lines;  the  transverse 
diameter  at  the  summit  of  the  lobes  of  the  crown  as  5  and  5J  lines  wide. 

The  constitution  of  the  lower  molars  of  Anchippodus  is  apparently  the 
same  as  in  Trogosus,  as  observed  in  the  New  Jersey  tooth  represented  in 
Figs.  45,  46,  Plate  XXX,  of  "  The  Extinct  Mammalian  Fauna  of  Dakota,"  &c. 
Fi-om  this  it  will  be  seen  the  crown  is  composed  very  nearly  on  the  same 
plan  as  that  of  the  corresponding  teeth  in  Anchitherium,  Palseotherium,  &c. 
It  is  composed  of  a  fore  and  aft  pair  of  lobes  with  crescentoid  summits, 
convex  externally  and  with  a  recess  internally.  The  size  of  the  tooth  is  the 
same  as  that  retained  in  the  jaw-specimen  above  described.  The  fangs  of 
the  last  molar  in  the  lower  jaw  indicate  a  trilobed  ci'own,*as  in  Anchitherium, 
Pateothferium,  &c.  The  premolars,  so  far  as  can  be  ascertained  by  their 
remains  in  the  jaw,  are  inserted  by  two  fangs.  Canines  most  probably  do 
not  exist  in  Trogosus,  their  absence  being  fully  compensated  by  the  large 
incisors. 

The  incisor  teeth  on  both  sides  together  are  iour  in  number;  but  while 
the  lateral  ones  are  developed  to  the  proportions  of  those  of  rodents,  the 
intermediate  pair  were  quite  small.  The  latter  are  lost  from  the  specimen, 
leaving  the  alveoli  occupied  by  matrix.  The  space  they  occupied  was  about 
the  fourth  of  an  incli  from  side  to  side. 

The  large  lateral  incisors  are  wonderi'ully  like  the  incisors  of  rodents,  not 
only  in  form,  position,  and  structure,  but  they  were  also  alike  in  their  perpet- 
IOg 


74 

uiil  mode  of  growth.  Tliey  do  not  extend  so  far  hack  within  the  jaw  as  in 
most  rodents,  and  in  this  respect  are  more  like  those  in  the  rabbits,  or,  as  in 
tlieir  nearer  relatives,  the  peccary  and  hog.  They  extend  beneath  the  pre- 
molars, but  the  bottom  of  the  alveolus  does  not  reach  the  position  of  the  first 
molar. 

The  incisors  are  convex  in  front,  and  not  flat,  as  usual  in  rodents.  The 
anterior  convexity  is  invested  with  thick  enamel  longitudinally  striated,  the 
striiB  being  wrinkled.  Externally  the  edge  of  the  enamel  appears  proportion- 
ately more  prominent  than  in  rodents ;  that  is  to  say,  it  projects  more  above 
the  level  of  the  contiguous  exposed  dentine.  In  transverse  section  the  incisors 
are  ovoid,  with  the  narrow  extremity  behind.  The  fore  and  aft  diameter  of 
the  section  is  10  lines ;  the  transverse  diameter  at  the  edges  of  the  enamel 
layer  is  6  J  lines.  The  anterior  convexity  covered  with  enamel  is  4  lines ; 
the  posterior  convexity  is  J  an  inch. 

The  cutting  edges  of  the  incisors  are  broken,  but  the  extremities  of  the 
teeth  are  sufficiently  well  preserved  to  exhibit  the  manner  of  wearing.  They 
were  not  only  worn  in  a  sloping  manner  backward,  as  in  rodents,  but  also 
externally,  so  that  it  appears  the  upper  incisors  were  more  divergent  than  the 
lower  ones,  and  held  a  position  related  to  them  more  like  the  condition 
observed  in  the  peccarj'. 

The  rami  of  the  jaw,  as  usual  in  pachyderms,  are  completely  co-ossified. 
The.  symphysis  is  remarkably  strong  and  deeji,  and  in  the  median  line  is 
nearly  3  inches  in  length.  The  rami  just  back  of  the  symphysis  are  nearly 
an  inch  thick.  The  chin  forms  a  long,  broad  slope,  defined  at  the  sides  by 
the  pronnnences  of  the  large  incisor  alveoli,  curving  from  the  base  of  the 
jaw  ])arallel  with  each  other  upward  and  forward.  The  chin  resembles  that 
of  the  peccary  or  rhinoceros,  but  is  more  convergent,  as  in  the  beaver. 
Approaching  the  exit  of  the  large  incisors  from  their  alveoli  the  intermediate 
space  is  deeply  grooved,  as  represented  in  Fig.  3. 

The  body  of  the  ramus  is  short,  deep,  and  thick.  Its  outer  surfixce  is  ver- 
tically convex.  The  base  is  thick  and  convex  fore  and  aft  as  well  as  trans- 
versely. 

The  masseteric  fossa  is  deep,  and  extends  downward  to  about  the  middle 
line  of  the  bodj^  of  the  ramus.  Two  mental  foramina  on  one  side,  and  tliree 
on  the  other,  occupy  a  position  in  advance  of  that  of  the  last  premolar. 


75 
Measurements  taken  from  the  lower-jaw  specimen  are  as  lollows : 

Inches.     Lines. 

Distauce  from  iucisive  alveoli  to  back  of  last  molar i  10 

Space  occnpied  by  the  molar  teeth,  estimated  . .' 4  0 

Space  occupied  by  the  true  molars 2  7 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  last  molar 1  I 

Depth  of  jaw  at  second  molar 1  G 

Thickness  of  jaw  below  second  molar 0  10 

Estimated  length  of  lateral  incisors " 3  3 

Depth  of  symphysis  following  its  slope li  10 

Trogosus  vetulus. 

An  apparent  smaller  species  of  Trogosus  is  indicated  b}^  the  fragment  of  an 
incisor  tooth,  represented  in  Fig.  43,  Plate  VI.  The  specimen  was  discov- 
ered by  Dr.  Carter  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger,  and  sent  to  the  writer  last 
summer.  It  consists  of  the  exserted  portion  of  the  tooth,  and  agrees  in  form 
and  proportions  with  the  corresponding  portion  of  the  incisors  in  the  jaw- 
specimen  above  described.  The  enamel  is  smoother,  but  invests  the  tooth  to 
the  same  relative  extent.  The  antero-posterior  diameter  of  the  tooth  lias 
been  about  8  lines ;  the  transverse  diameter  4  lines. 

HYOPSODUS. 

Hyopsodus  paulus. 

One  of  the  smallest  of  pachyderms,  referred  to  a  genus  and  species  above 
named,  is  established  on  many  specimens,  chiefly  consisting  of  portions  of 
lower  jaws  with  teeth,  (Figs.  1  to  9.  Plate  VI.)  It  was  originally  indicated, 
fi'om  a  lower-jaw  fragment  with  teeth  (Figs.  1,  2)  of  an  old  animal,  discov- 
ered by  Professor  Playden,  in  1870,  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger,  Wyo- 
ming. Since  then  the  writer  has  received  a  number  of  more  characteristic 
specimens,  obtained  l)y  Dr.  J.  Van  A.  Carter  and  Dr.  Joseph  K.  Corson,  at 
Grizzly  Buttes,  Henry's  Fork  of  Green  River,  Lodge-Pole  Trail,  and  other 
localities  in  the  neighborhood  of  Fort  Bridger,  Wyoming. 

The  animal  was  rather  less  in  size  than  the  Ajjhelotherium  Duvernoyi  of 
Gervais,  the  remains  of  which  were  found  in  the  gypsum  quarries  of  Paris, 
France.  It  also  appears  to  have  been  allied  to  this,  as  indicated  by  the  num- 
ber, relation,  and  constitution  of  the  teeth.  Both  Aphelotherium  and  Hyop- 
sodus possessed  unbroken  arches  of  teeth  to  the  jaws,  as  in  the  Anoplothe- 
rium,  whose  remains  are  found   in  association  with  those. of  the  first-named 


genus. 


76 

The  iminber  of  teetli  in  Hyopsodiis  appears  to  be  three  incisors,  a  canine, 
and  seven  molars  to  the  series  on  each  side  of  both  jaws. 

Neither  incisors  nor  canines  are  preserved  in  any  of  the  specimens  we 
have  the  opportunity  of  examining.  Two  lower-jaw  specimens  retaining 
portions  of  the  incisive,  canine,  and  premolar  alveoli,  and  the  true  molars, 
apparently  prove  the  numl)er  of  teeth  to  be  as  above  indicated. 

The  canine  tooth  of  Hyopsodus  is  comparatively  of  small  size,  though 
larger  thmi  the  incisors  or  the  first  premolar.  It  appears  to  have  about  the 
same  size  in  relation  with  the  other  teeth  as  in  Aphelotherium  anjd  Anoplo- 
therium. 

The  premolars  successively  increase  in  size  from  the  first  to  the  fourth. 
The  first  possesses  a  single  fang ;  the  others  two  fixngs.  The  anterior  two 
premolars  are  lost  from  all  the  specimens  under  examination. 

The  inferior  true  molars  (Figs.  1  to  9,  Plate  VI)  of  Hyopsodus  have 
oblong  quadrately  oval  crowns,  with  the  fore  and  aft  diameter  exceeding  the 
transverse,  which  is  about  equal  to  the  depth.  They  are  inserted  in  the 
usual  manner  in  pachyderms  by  a  pair  of  fangs,  the  posterior  of  which  in 
the  last  tooth  is  widened  backwardly,  as  is  commonly  the  case  in  congeneric 
animals. 

The  crowns  are  composed  of  four  principal  lobes,  connate  at  base  ;  but 
the  crown  of  the  last  tooth  has  an  additional  or  fifth  lobe  at  its  back  part  as 
well  developed  as  some  of  the  lobes  in  advance.  A  rudiment  of  this  fifth 
lobe  is  recognized  in  the  other  true  molars  as  a  small  tubercle,  occupying  a 
corresponding  position. 

The  four  principal  lobes  of  the  crown  of  the  true  molars  are  arranged  in 
pairs  not  quite  transverse,  but  slightly  oblique,  so  as  to  appear  somewhat 
alternating.  The  fifth  lobe  of  the  last  molar  is  opposite  the  interval  of  the 
pair  of  lobes  in  advance. 

Of  the  four  lobes,  the  outer  are  demi-conoidal,  and  the  posterior  one  is 
slightly  the  larger.  The  inner  lobes  are  simply  conical,  and  the  anterior  is 
the  larger.  The  outer  lobes  in  the  unworn  condition  have  acute  crescentoid 
summits,  or  form  V-like  ridges,  with  the  arms  declining  from  the  pointed 
angle.     The  inner  lobes  in  the  same  condition  have  pointed  summits. 

The  contiguous  horns  of  the  crescentoid  summits  of  the  outer  lobes  join 
the  antero-internal  lobe.  Tiie  anterior  horn  of  the  crescentoid  summit  of  the 
antero-external  lobe  curves  inwardly  to  the  base  of  the  antero-internal  lobe. 


77 

Tlic  jiosterior  lioni  of  tlic  crescentoid  summit  of  tlic  postero-extenial  lobe 
ends  in  the  tubercle  at  the  back  of  the  crown,  and  in  tiie  last  molar,  in  the 
homologous  fifth  lobe.  The  latter  is  joined  by  an  acute  ridge,  descending  to 
the  base  of  the  postero-internal  lobe. 

A  thin  basal  ridge  exists  at  the  fore  and  back  parts  of  the  crown  of  the 
first  and  second  molars,  and  the  fore  part  in  the  last  molar.  An  element 
also  exists  at  the  interval,  externally,  of  the  outer  principal  lobes,  and  in  some 
specimens  is  more  or  less  produced  around  the  bottom  of  the  antero-external 
lobe. 

As  the  crowns  of  the  true  molars  are  worn  away,  circular  islets  of  dentine 
appear  at  the  summits  of  the  inner  lobes,  and  crescentic  islets  at  the  summits 
of  the  outer' lobes.  In  the  progress  of  attrition  the  dentinal  surfaces  expand, 
and  the  horns  of  the  crescentic  islets  become  united  with  the  circular  islets. 
In  an  advanced  stage  of  wear  the  triturating  surface  of  the  molars  presents  two 
elliptical  surfaces  crossing  the  crown,  with  a  slight  obliquity,  and  united  by  a 
median  isthmus,  the  whole  bordered  by  a  band  of  enamel.  Such  a  condition 
is  seen  in  the  specimen  represented  in  Figs  1,  2,  Plate  VI,  which  is  that 
upon  which  the  genus  was  originally  proposed.  By  comparing  this  with  the 
others  in  different  stages  of  wear,  represented  in  Figs.  3  to  9,  of  the  same 
plate,  its  correspondence  with  these,  whicli  preserve  more  characteristic 
generic  marks,  can  be  readily  recognized. 

The  last  lower  premolar  of  Hyopsodus  (Figs.  5,  8,  Plate  VI)  is  smaller 
than  the  true  molars,  and  like  them  is  inserted  by  a  pair  of  fangs.  Its  crown 
is  proportionately  of  greater  depth  than  in  the  true  molars,  and,  as  in  these,  is 
widest  fore  and  aft.  The  outer  fore  part  of  the  crown  is  composed  of  a  demi- 
conoidal  lobe,  which  is  the  principal  one,  and  it  corresponds  with  the  antero- 
external  lobe  of  the  true  molars.  It  has  the  same  form  as  the  latter  lobe,  but  is 
better  developed.  The  anterior  horn  of  its  crescentoid  summit  forms  a  curved 
ridge,  defining  the  fore  part  of  the  triturating  surface  of  the  crown.  The  poste- 
rior horn  of  the  crescentoid  summit  terminates  in  a  small  conical  lobe  occupying 
the  middle  of  the  crown  internally.  The  back  of  the  crown  is  tbrmcd  By  a 
broad  heel,  skirted  by  a  basal  ridge  externally,  and  divided  by  another  ridge, 
which  descends  from  the  summit  of  the  principal  lobe  of  the  crown,  and  bor- 
ders the  heel  posteriorly  and  internally.  A  thin  basal  ridge  occupies  the  fore 
part  of  tlie  crown.  In  the  wearing  of  the  crown  of  the  last  premolar,  the 
exposed  dentine  assumes  the  Ibrni  of  the  Greek  letter  t,  lying  on  its  right 
side. 


78 

The  penultimate  lower  premolar  (Fig.  8)  is  a  reduced  form  of  the  one 
behind,  with  the  internal  median  conical  lobe  obsolete. 

The  lower  jaw  has  its  two  rami  co-ossified  at  the  symphysis.  It  is  thick 
and  rounded  at  the  base,  which  is  convex  fore  and  aft  beneath  the  molar 
series.  The  chin  is  rounded  transversely.  The  masseteric  fossa  is  well 
marked  and  defined  anteriorly  by  a  prominent  ridge  descending  from  the 
front  border  of  the  coronoid  process  to  the  lower  third  of  the  side  of  the  jaw. 

The  ramus  of  the  jaw  would  appear  to  have  increased  in  depth  and 
assumed  a  more  robust  condition  in  the  advance  of  age,  for  in  those  specimens 
in  -which  the  teeth  are  least  abraded,  the  jaw  is  shallowest,  and  in  that  in  which 
they  are  most  worn  it  is  deepest.  Specimens  exhibiting  the  teeth  in  an 
intermediate  state  of  wear  have  the  jaw  of  intermediate  depth  and  strengtli 
to  the  others. 

All  the  specimens  represented  in  Figs  1,  3,  4,  6,  and  7  I  attribute  to  the 
same  species,  notwithstanding  the  difference  in  the  proportion  of  length  lo 
depth  in  the  different  ones. 

Two  or  three  mental  foramina  occupy  a  slightly  variable  position  beneath 
the  premolars. 

During  the  summer  of  1871,  Dr.  Carter  discovered,  at  Grizzly  Buttes  and 
Lodge-Pole  Trail,  several  specimens,  consisting  of  fragments  of  upper  jaws 
with  well-preserved  teeth,  which  are  of  a  size  and  form  that  would  adapt 
them  to  the  lower-jaw  specimens  of  Hyopsodus.  'I'he  specimens  from 
Grizzly  Buttes  were  accompanied  by  one  of  the  lower-jaw  specimens  upon 
wliich  the  latter  was  founded,  and  this  looks  sufficiently  like  several  of  them 
in  general  appearance  to  have  belonged  to  the  same  individual. 

One  of  the  specimens  represented  in  Fig.  18,  Plate  VI,  contains  a  series 
of  three  premolars  and  the  succeeding  molars.  In  advance  of  the  series  there 
remains  a  portion  of  an  alveolus  which  apparently  belonged  to  another  pre- 
molar. If  such  is  the  case,  the  number  of  premolars  would  be  the  same  as_ 
in  the  lower  jaw  of  Hyopsodus. 

The  teeth  (Figs.  18  to  22)  increase  in  size  from  the  first  to  the  sixth,  the 
seventh  being  again  reduced  to  the  size  of  the  fifth  The  second  premolar 
is  inserted  by  a  pair  of  fangs  of  which  the  posterior  is  wider  than  the  other. 
The  succeeding  premolars  and  molars  are  inserted  with  three  fangs,  of  which 
the  inner  one  of  the  molars  is  a  connate  pair. 

Tiie  crowns  of  the  molars  (Figs.  I'J  to  21)  are  quadrate,  wider  transversely, 


79 

and  abt)iif  halt  (he  depth  ot"  the  breadth.  They  arc  composed  each  of  six 
lolies  expanding  and  continuous  at  base.  The  outer  and  inner  pair  of  lobes 
are  nearly  equal ;  the  intermediate  pair  is  smaller. 

The  outer  lobes  of  the  molars  are  conical,  and  united  where  contiguous, 
but  they  do  not  form  an  external  buttress  by  their  union,  the  intei'vening 
surface  externally  being  concave.  In  the  last  molar  the  posterior  of  the  outer 
lobes  is  proportionately  less  well  developed  than  in  the  others. 

The  inner  lobes  of  the  crown  are  likewise  conical,  and  united  where  con- 
tiguous. The  posterior  of  tiiese  lobes  is  the  smaller,  and  in  the  last  molar  is 
entirely  suppressed,  or  appears  only  as  a  slight  elevation  of  the  basal  ridge 
occupying  the  back  of  the  crown.  The  summit  of  the  antero-internal  lobe 
is  prolonged  obliquely  to  join  the  antero-median  lobe.  The  summit  of  the 
postero-internal  lobe  is  prolonged  outwardly  back  of  the  postero-external 
lobe,  so  as  to  appear  as  a  basal  ridge  to  this  part  of  the  crown. 

The  median  lobes  hold  a  slightly  more  advanced  position  than  the  includ- 
ing lobes.  The  back  one  is  isolated  or  free  to  its  base ;  the  front  one,  by 
prolongation,  is  associated  with  the  antero-internal  lobe  and  the  fore  part  of 
the  base  of  the  antero-external  lobe. 

A  strong  basal  ridge  occupies  the  fore  part  of  the  crown,  and  also,  less  well 
developed,  festoons  the  outer  part. 

In  the  wearing  of  the  upper  molars  (Figs.  19  to  21)  islets  of  dentine  first 
appeared  at  the  summits  of  the  six  lobes  of  the  crown.  Those  of  the  two 
outer  lobes  soon  became  continuous ;  followed  by  those  of  the  antero-median 
and  anteror  internal  lobes  With  the  widening  of  these  two  tracts,  the  islet 
of  the  postero-internal  lobe  next  became  continuous  with  that  in  advance. 
At  this  stage  there  would  appear  three  dentinal  tracts:  one  lor  the  outer  pair 
of  lobes,  a  second  for  the  internal  and  antero-median  lobes,  and  a  third  as  a 
circular  islet  on  the  postero-median  lobe. 

The  posterior  two  premolars  (Figs.  19,  21)  have  bilobed  crowns,  remind- 
ing one  of  the  premolars  of  ruminants.  The  sudden  reduction  from  the  six 
lobes  of  the  crown  of  the  molars  to  the  single  pair  of  the  crown  of  the  pre- 
molars is  a  remarkable  anatomical  character.  The  lobes  are  pyramidal,  and 
so  far  spread  apart  as  to  give  the  crown  a  greater  width  transversely.  The 
summit  of  the  inner  lobe  forms  a  crescentoid  ridge,  embracing  the  bottom  of 
the  outer  lobe.  A  strong  basal  ridge  bounds  the  fore  and  back  part  of  the 
crown,  and  festoons  it  externally. 


80 


In  the  Uiird  premular  the  inner  lobe  is  less  well  developed  at  its  fore  part 
than  in  the  fotirth. 

The  crown  of  the  second  premolar  (Figs.  19,  22)  is  formed  of  a  single 
conical  lobe,  corresponding  with  the  external  lobe  of  the  succeeding  tooth. 
Postero-internally,  it  presents  a  feeble  rudiment  of  an  inner  lobe.  The 
crowns  of  the  premolars  were  worn  away  mostly  in  a  slanting  manner  poste- 
riorly. The  exposed  dentine  in  the  two  lobed  crowns  became  continuous  at 
».  the  back  of  the  crown. 

The  molars  above  described  resemble,  in  construction  and  in  the  relative 
position  of  the  six  lobes  of  the  crown,  those  of  Hyracotherium  and  Pliolophus, 
two  extinct  genera  of  pachyderms,  described  by  Professor  Owen  from  remains 
found  in  the  London  clay,  an  Eocene  formation  of  the  estuary  of  the  Thames. 
In  both  the  genera  named  the  last  molar  is  ])roportionately  better  developed ; 
and  in  all  the  molars  the  postero-internal  lobe  and  the  basal  ridge  are  likewise 
proportionately  better  developed.  The  upper  pi-emolars  are  quite  different.. 
In  Hyracotherium  the  back  t\yo  premolars  have  five  lobed  crowns,  and  in 
Pliolophus  the  last  premolar  has  a  similar  constitution. 

Too  small  a  portion  of  the  jaw  (Fig.  18)  containing  the  teeth  above 
described  has  been  preserved  to  ascertain  anything  of  importance  as  to  the 
shape  of  the  face.  The  infra-orbital  foramen  is  situated  immediately  above 
the  interval  of  the  back  two  premolars. 

Measurements  from  some  of  the  upper-jaw  specimens  and  teeth  above 
described  are  as  follows  : 


Specimens  in  Plato  VI. 


Figs.  18,19. 


i  Lines. 

Si)ace  occupied  by  series  of  six  molar  teetb 9 

Space  occupied  liy  true  molars 5 J 

Space  occupied  by  tbree  premolars 3^ 

Breadtb  of  .second  premolar 1 

Widtb  of  second  premolar 1 

lireadtli  of  tbird  premolar '  IJ 

Width  of  tbird  premolar li 

Breadtb  of  fourth  premolar i  1^ 

Width  of  fourth  premolar 2 

Breadth  of  first  molar ''  1^ 

Width  of  first  molar '  2^ 

Breadtb  of  second  molar i  2 

Widtb  of  secoud  molar 2J 

Breadth  of  last  molar 1^ 

Width  of  last  molar 2 


Fig.  20. 


21 


U 
2i 


Lows. 

L 

incs. 

5 

^ 

• 

^ 

21 


12 

2i 


81 


HyOPSODUS  MINU6CULU.S. 

A  smaller  species  of  Hyopsodus  than  the  one  described  in  tlic  jireceding 
pages  appears  to  be  indicated  by  a  specimen  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  in  the 
buttes  of  Dry  Creek.  The  specimen  consists  of  an  upper-jaw  fragment  con- 
taining the  true  molars  and  part  of  the  last  premolar,  which  are  represented 
in  Fig.  5,  Plate  XXVII.  The  teeth  differ  in  no  essential  character  and  only 
in  size.  Their  com  partitive  measurement  with  those  of  H.  paulus  are  as 
follows : 


Hyopsodus 
mimisculiis. 


Hyopsodus 
paulus. 


Leugtli  of  space  occupied  by  the  last  premolar  ami  molars. . 

Length  of  space  occupied  by  the  molars 

Breadth  of  last  premolar 

Width  of  last  preaiolar 

Breadth  of  tirst  molar , 

Width  of  first  molar 

Breadth  of  secoud  molar , 

Width  of  second  molar 

Breadth  of  third  molar - 

Width  of  third  molar 


Lines. 
5,4 
4.4 
1.05 


8 

6 

0 

6 

1 

25 

7 


Lines. 

6.45 

5.2 

1.4 

2  2 

1.8 

2.4 

2.0 

2.8 

1.6 

2.35 


MICROSUS. 

MiCROSUS  CUSPIDATUS. 

The  genus  Microsus  is  obscurely  determined  and  is  uncertain  in  its  distinc- 
tion from  the  previous  genus.  It  was  originally  inferred  from  the  lower-jaw 
fragment  with  the  back  two  molars,  represented  in  Fig.  10,  Plate  VI,  at  the 
same  time  that  Hyopsodus  paulus  was  characterized  from  the  only  specimen 
then  in  our  possession,  represented  in  Fig.  1  of  the  same  plate.  The  well- 
marked  difference  in  the  form  and  proportion  of  the  corresponding  portion  of 
the  jaw  led  me  to  view  it  as  pertaining  to  a  diffei'ent  genus  fi'ora  Hyopsodus. 
Subsequently  I  have  had  the  opportunity  of  examining  many  and  more  char- 
acteristic specimens  referable  to  the  latter,  but  none  which  with  any  certainty 
could  be  ascribed  to  Microsus. 

The  jaw-specimen  referred  to  the  latter  was  obtained  by  Professor  Hay- 
den  on  Black's  Fork  of  Green  River.  The  jaw  would  appear  to  be  narrower 
and  weaker  than  hi  Hyopsodus.     The  fragment  as  seen  in  Fig.  10,  in  com- 

11    G 


82 

parisoii  with  corresponding  portions  ofllic  latter,  as  seen  in  Figs.  1,3,4,  7,  is 
proportionately  of  less  depth,  and  at  the  base  beneath  the  molars  curves 
much  more  upwardly  in  a  back-ward  direction. 

The  teeth,  represented  in  Figs.  10  and  11,  are  unworn,  and  they  liave  the 
same  size  and  constitution  as  those  of  Hyopsodus.  In  the  specimen  the  con- 
stituent lobes  of  the  crown  appear  more  prominent  and  their  intervals  more 
deeply  angular  than  in  those  of  Hyopsodus,  but  this  difference  is  probably 
due  to  difference  in  age.  In  all  the  specimens  ascribed  to  Hyopsodus  the 
teeth  are  more  or  less  worn,  and  only  in  that  attributed  to  Microsus  are  they 
unworn.  Observing,  also,  that  the  proportionate  depth  of  the  lower  jaw  in 
the  different  specimens  of  Hyopsodus  holds  some  relationship  with  the  age 
of  the  animal,  as  indicated  by  the  extent  of  wearing  of  the  teeth,  I  have  sup- 
posed that  the  variations  observed  in  the  jaw-fragment  of  Microsus  might  be 
due  to  the  same  cause,  and  that  it  therefore  really  pertains  to  Hyopsodm  jjau- 
lus.  Thus  by  comparison  of  Fig.  10,  representing  Microsus,  with  that  of 
Fig.  6,  representing  a  specimen  of  Hyopsodus,  in  which  the  teeth  are  least 
worn,  the  resemblance  is  observed  to  be  greater  than  with  the  other  and 
older  specimens  of  Hyopsodus. 

Comparative  measurements  of  the  specimen  referred  to  Microsus  with 
specimens  of  Hyopsodus  represented  in  Figs.  1,  3,  and  6  are  as  follows: 


Depth  of  lower  jatv  at  fore  part  of  last  molar 

Space  occupied  by  last  two  molars 

Auteroi)osterior  diameter  of  last  molar 

Antei'o-posterior  diameter  of  second  molar. . 


Microsus. 


Lines. 


"5" 


Hyopsodus. 


Via.  10.       Fig.- 1 


Lines. 

H 

O 


Fig.  3.      Fig.  6. 


Lines. 

H 

5 

2 


Lines. 


MICROSYOPS. 

An  extinct  genus  of  small  mammals,  to  which  the  above  name  was  given, 
was  originally  founded,  on  several  lower-jaw  fragments  containing  molar  teeth. 
Though  classed  among  the  pachyderms,  it  is  not  positive  that  such  is  the  true 
position  of  the  genus.  The  more  complete  of  the  specimens  upon  which  it 
was  characterized  indicates  a  series  of  six  molar  teeth  following  closely  after 
a  well-developed  canine.     The  number  of  incisors  is  unknown. 


83 

In  the  genus  Limnothoriuni,  as  established  by  Professor  Marsh,  from  the 
typical  species  Z.  ti/nmnus,  the  dental  formula  consists  of  two  incisors,  a 
canine  and  seven  molars. 

Mycrosyops  gracilis. 

The  more  characteristic  specimen  upon  which  this  species  was  named  con- 
sists of  a  portion  of  the  left  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw,  represented  in  Fig.  14, 
Plate  VI,  of  the  natural  size.  The  specimen  was  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter 
on  Grizzly  Butte.  Besides  the  fang  of  the  canine  and  those  of  the  premolars, 
it  contains  the  true  molars  entire.  These  are  moderately  worn  at  the  sum- 
mits of  the  constituent  lobes  of  their  crowns,  and  their  triturating  surfaces 
are  represented  in  Fig,  15  of  the  same  plate,  magnified  four  diameters.  The 
jaw-fragraent  retains  part  of  the  rough  sutural  surface  of  the  symphysis,  show- 
ing that  its  union  was  ligamentous  with  the  other  ramus.  The  basal  portion 
beneath  the  molars  is  broken  away.  Below  the  premolars  it  is  of  moderate 
depth  and  thickness,  and  soon  curves  upward  with  the  fang  of  the  canine.  The 
mental  foramen  is  situated  below  the  second  premolar.  The  fang  of  the 
canine  indicates  a  proportionately  larger  tooth  than  in  Hyopsodus.  It  is  lat- 
erally compressed  and  curves  ujjward,  forward,  and  t)utward.  The  transverse 
section  is  oval  with  the  long  diameter  directed  obliquely  forward  and  out- 
ward, and  measuring  1.8  line,  while  the  short  diameter  is  1  line. 

The  premolars  successively  increase  in  size.  The  first  is  separated  by  a 
slight  hiatus  from  the  canine,  and  was  inserted  by  a  single  fang.  The  others 
have  two  fangs. 

The  molars  have  oblong  quadrately-oval  crowns  of  nearly  uniform  size. 
They  are  inserted  with  two  fangs,  with  the  back  one  of  the  last  molar  widened, 
as  usual  in  most  ungulates. 

The  crown  of  the  molars  is  composed  of  two  divisions,  in  addition  to 
which  the  last  one  has  a  large  posterior  tubercle.  The  anterior  division  of  the 
crown  is  smaller  than  the  posterior,  and  appears  of  the  same  form  in  a  more 
contracted  condition.  Each  division  consists  of  an  external  crescentoid  coni- 
cal lobe  and  an  internal  rudimental  conical  lobe  or  tubercle,  whicli  is  placed 
opposite  the  back  part  of  the  former  lobe. 

The  front  arm  of  the  anterior  crescentoid.  lobe  ends  in  a  thickening  in  ad- 
vance of  the  antero-internal  lobe.  Tlie  corresponding  arm  of  the  better  de- 
veloped posterior  crescentoid  lobe  terminates  at  the  base  of  the  lobe  in  front 
of  it.     The  back  arm  of  the  same  lobe  forms  a  slight  thickening  contiguous 


84 

to  thr.  postero-intenjal  lobe.     In  the  last  molar  this  thickening  appears  to  be 
developed  into  the  large  tubercle  back  of  the  second  division  of  the  crown. 
Feeble  traces  of  a  basal  ridge  occupy  (he  interval  of  the  outer  lobes  and  the 
•  back  of  the  crown. 

Measurements  of  the  lower-jaw  specimen  oi  Microsyojjs  gracilis. are  as  fol- 
lows : 

Lines. 

Depth  of  lon-er  jaw  below  last  molar 4 

Thickuess  of  lower  jaw  below  last  premolar 2J 

Distance  from  canine  alveolus  to  back  of  last  molar 10 

Space  occupied  by  the  entire  molar  series , 9| 

Space  occupied  by  tbe  premolars  4 

Space  occupied  by  the  molars » 5| 

Breadth  of  first  molar 1^ 

Breadth  of  second  molar ., 2 

Breadth  of  third  molar 2 

The  specific  name  of  31.  gracilis  was  originally  given  under  the  impression 
that  the  remains  referred  by  Professor  Marsh  to  Hyopsodus  gracilis  pertained 
to  the  same  animal.  A  specimen  exhibited  to  the  writer  by  Professor  Marsh 
would  indicate  that  M.  gracilis  is  the  same  as  the  animal  named  by  him 
Limnothcrium  elegans.  As  Microsyops  is  generically  distinct  from  Limno- 
therium,  as  characterized  from  the  typical  species  L.  tyrannus^  the  specific 
name  of  the  former  would  be  Microsyops  elegans. 

Another  specimen,  originally  referred  to  Microsyops  gracilis,  is  represented 
in  Fig.  16,  Plate  VI,  and  was  found  by  Dr.  Carter  near  Lodge-Pole  Trail, 
about  tea  miles  from  Fort  Bridger.  It  consists  of  a  portion  of  the  left  ramus 
of  the  lower  jaw,  containing  the  j^enultimate  molar  and  part  of  the  last  one. 

The  only  remaining  entire  molar,  a  view  of  the  triturating  surface  of 
which  is  given  in  Fig.  17,  closely  resembles  the  corresponding  tooth  in  the 
specimen  first  described,  except  that  it  is  a  little  larger.  (The  artist  has 
made  it  appear  different  by  exaggerating  the  proportions  of  the  tubercle  be- 
tween the  posterior  lobes,  and  leaving  it  out  altogether  in  the  corresponding 
view  of  Fig.  15.)  The  remaining  portion  of  the  last  molar  also  agrees  with 
the  corresponding  portion  in  the  first-described  specimen.  The  lower  jaw  is 
comparatively  deep,  and  is  nearly  straight  along  the  base.  The  fore  part 
with  the  symphysis  is  lost,  but  it  would  appear  not  to  have  been  so  shallow 
and  thick  as  in  the  former  specimen,  which  leads  me  to  suspect  that  it 
perhaps  belongs  to  a  different  animal.  The  mental  ibramen  holds  the  same 
relative  position  as  in    the  other  specimen.     The    ridge  bordering  the  lore 


85 

jiaii  (){'  (lie  coroiioid  process  terminates  in  a  tul)ercle  at  the  fore  part  ol  Ihe 
moderately  deep  masseteric  fossa. 

Another  foramen,  perhaps  not  constant  to  the  species,  is  situated  below 
tlie  position  of  the  fore  part  of  the  first  molar. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows: 

Lines. 

Depth  of  jaw  below  last  molar -if 

Depth  of  jaw  below  last  premolar 4^^ 

Space  occupied  bj'  last  i)remohir  and  molars 7^ 

Space  occupied  by  the  molars 0 

Breadth  of  penultimate  molar 2J 

Breadth  of  last  molar 2^ 

The  only  specimen  of  an  upper  tooth  which  may,  with  any  probability,  be 
supposed  to  belong  to  Microsyops,  is  contained  in  a  small  fragment  of  the 
jaw,  found  by  Dr.  Carter  on  Dry  Creek.  The  tooth,  apparently  a  first  or 
second  molar,  is  represented  in  Figs.  19,  20,  Plate  XXVII.  The  crown  is 
not  so  square  and  is  proportionately  of  less  breadth  fore  and  aft  than  in  the 
corresponding  tooth  of  Hyopsodus.  It  narrows  inwardly  more  than  in  the 
latter,  the  reduction  taking  place  posteriorly,  where  the  crown  is  concave. 
The  constitution  of  the  tooth  is  nearly  as  in  Hyopsodus,  and  the  principal 
difference  is  found  in  the  condition  of  the  postero-internal  lobe.  In  Hyopso- 
dus, this  is  a  reduced  form  of  the  lobe  in  advance,  being  crescentoid.  In  the 
supposed  tooth  of  Microsyops,  the  postero-internal  lobe  appears  as  a  conical 
tubercle  springing  from  the  base  postero-internally  of  the  larger  crescentoid 
lobe  in  front.  In  Hyopsodus,  the  postero-median  lolje  is  a  simple  cone,  but 
in  the  tooth  in  question  it  is  pyramidal. 

The  antero-posterior  diameter  of  the  crown  external!}'  is  1.6  lines  ;  inter- 
nally, 1.2  lines;  the  transverse  diameter  anteriorly  is  2.2  lines. 

Undetermined. 

Fig.  12,  Plate  VI,  represents  a  specimen  found  by  Dr.  Carter  on  Henry's 
Fork  of  Green  River.  It  consists  of  a  lower-jaw  fragment  with  the  last  pre- 
molar and  the  fangs  of  the  molars  of  a  mature  animal  of  undetermined 
character,  but,  from  the  form  of  the  remaining  tooth,  evidently  allied  with 
Hyopsodus.  The  premolar.  Fig.  13,  is  unlike  the  corresponding  one  of  the 
latter  genus,  as  seen  by  comparing  it  with  Figs.  5  and  8,  but  resembles  tlie 
true  molars.  Suspecting  that  it  might  be  a  last  temporary  molar,  notwith- 
standing its  slightly  worn  condition  and  its  association  with  the  full  series  of 


8G 

molars  in  functional  ])ositiou  behind,  1  examined  the  jaw  beneath,  Init  fouiKl  ' 
110  trace  of  a  successor. 

The  portion  of  jaw  is  of  more  uniform  depth,  and  the  base  less  convex 
than  in  Hyopsodus.  It  is  also  more  impressed  and  concave  below  the  position 
of  the  back  molars.  The  space  occupied  l\y  the  molars  is  about  equal  to 
that  in  the  smaller  specimens  of  Hyopsodus. 

Perhaps  the  sjiecimen  may  pertain  to  Microsus,  or  prol^ably  may  l)elong  to 
a  genus  difTerent  from  either  of  those  just  named.  Its  measurements  are  as 
follows : 

Lines. 

Space  occupied  by  tlie  last  premolar  aud  molars 7f 

Space  occupied  by  tbe  molars ■  . .  5| 

Depth  of  jaw  at  fore  part  of  last  molar '3^ 

Depth  of  jaw  at  last  premolar Sf 

Anteroposterior  diameter  of  last  molar 2i 

Anteroposterior  diameter  of  last  i^remolar If 

NOTHARCTUS. 

NOTHAKCTUS    TENEBROSUS. 

A  small  extinct  pachyderm,  referred  to  a  genus  with  the  above  name,  judg- 
ing from  the  anatomical  characters  of  the  specimen  upon  which  it  was  founded, 
was  probably  as  carnivorous  in  habit  as  the  raccoon  and  bear.  The  specimen 
to  which  I  allude,  represented  in  Fig.  36,  Plate  VI,  consists  of  tbe  right 
ramus  of  a  lower  jaw  with  most  of  tbe  teeth.  It  was  discovered  during  Pro- 
fessor Hayden's  exploration  of  1870,  on  Black's  Fork  of  Green  River.  I  at 
first  viewed  it  as  pertaining  to  a  carnivorous  animal,  and  thus  referred  it ;  but 
tbe  anatomical  relations  of  the  specimen  with  those  of  remains  of  other  ani- 
mals which  have  been  found  in  association  with  it  have  led  me  to  view  the 
jaw  as  having  belonged  to  a  pachyderm.  The  ramus  of  the  ja^v  contained  a 
series  of  seven  molar  teeth,  all  of  which  are  preserved  except  the  first  pre- 
molar'. A  well-developed  canine  occupies  a  position  immediately  in  advance 
of  the  molar  series,  and  the  incisors  filled  the  interval  between  the  canines  of 
the  two  sides.  Thus  the  teeth  of  the  lower"  jaw  of  Notliarctus  form  an  un- 
broken arch.  The  incisors  are  lost  from  the  specimen,  and  the  condition  of 
the  alveoli  is  such  that  the  number  of  them  cannot  be  ascertained. 

The  canine  tooth  of  Notharctus  in  its  relative  position,  form,  and  propor- 
tions resembles  that  of  ordinary  carnivores.  It  curves  from  the  opening  of 
the  alveolus  slightly  backward  witli   an    inclination   outward.     The  crown  is 


87 

considerably  elevated  from  an  increased  jirolrusion  (if  the  fang,  sucli  as  is 
observable  in  carnivorons  animals  past  maturity.  Tlie  fang  is  gibbous  and 
feebly  curved. 

The  molar  teeth,  represented  in  Fig.  37,  magnified  two  diameters,  are  con- 
siderably worn  in  the  specimen,  all  of  therrt  exhil)iting  exposed  tracts  of  den- 
tine, due  to  the  wear  of  mastication. 

The  four  premolars  successively  increase  in  size,  and  are  inserted  by  a  pair 
of  fangs,  except  the  first,  in  which  they  appear  to  have  been  connate.  The 
crowns  of  the  premolars  from  behind  forward  exhil)it  a  successive  reduction 
to  a  simpler  form  from  that  of  the  molars. 

The  crowns  of  the  second  and  tliird  premolars,  and  no  doubt  also  that  of 
the  first  one,  which  is  lost  from  the  specimen,  have  the  conical  form  of  the 
corresponding  teeth  in  carnivores,  though  they  appear  less  prominent,  due  to 
their  worn  condition.  They  are  slightly  thickei"  behind  than  in  front,  and  a 
basal  ridge  internally  forms  a  slight  offset  or  heel  posteriorly,  and  a  still  feebler 
one  in  the  third  premolar  anteriorly. 

The  crown  of  the  fourth  premolar  is  intermediate  in  character  with  tliose 
in  advance  and  those  of  the  molars  behind.  Its  fore  part  consists  of  a  conical 
lol)e  like  the  crown  of  tlie  anterior  premolars ;  its  back  part  is  a  broad  heel 
corresponding  with  the  back  lobe  of  the  molars.  The  summit  of  the  princi- 
pal lobe  is  extended  obliquely  inward  and  backward  and  is  continuous  with 
the  inner  basal  ridge  of  the  crown.  Externally,  the  latter  is  embraced  by  a 
basal  ridge. 

The  crown  of  the  second  premolar  is  worn  away  along  its  posterior  slope ; 
tlie  crown  of  the  third  to  a  greater  degree  in  a  corresponding  position,  and 
also  to  a  less  degree  along  its  anterior  slope. 

.  The  molars  are  nearly  alike  in  form  and  constitution,  and  are  inserted  with 
two  fangs.  The  crown  of  the  molars  bears  a  certain  degree  of  resemblance 
in  construction  to  those  of  the  raccoon,  and  in  a  less  degree  to  those  of  the 
opossum,  but  certainly  enough  resemblance  to  both  to  indicate  a  relation 
which  is  not  merely  accidental. 

In  the  unworn  condition  of  the  lower  molars  of  Notharctus,  the  crown 
would  appear  to  be  composed  of  two  divisions.  The  anterior  division  pre- 
sents three  prominent  points  continuous  in  an  acute  crescentoid  ridge.  The 
principal  point  is  central  and  external,  the  second  is  nearly  as  well  developed 
and  internal,  and  the  third  point,  feebly  developed,  occupies  the  fore   part  of 


88 

the  crown  The  posterior  division  presents  two  elevated  points,  conjoined  in 
a  crescentoid  ridge.  The  anterior  extremity  of  this  ridge  joins  the  front 
division  of  the  crown.  Its  more  elevated  point  is  extemal  and  posterior,  and 
its  less  developed  one  occupies  the  postcro-internal  corner  of  the  crown.  A 
l)asal  ridge  incloses  the  crown,  except  internally. 

Each  division  of  the  crown  of  the  molars  incloses  in  the  arms  of  its  cres- 
centoid ridge  a  depression,  which  is  largest  in  the  posterior  division.  The 
crown  of  the  last  molar  is  more  prolonged  backward  than  the  others,  arising 
from  the  greater  degree  of  development  in  this  direction  of  its  posterior 
division. 

In  the  worn  condition  of  tlie  molars,  as  seen  in  Fig.  37,  the  crescentoid 
ridges  of  the  divisions  of  the  crown  have  been  so  much  abraded  as  to  expose 
broad  crescentoid  tracts  of  dentine  continuous  on  the  two  divisions  of  the 
crown. 

The  rami  of  the  lower  jaw  of  Northarctus  appear  to  be  co-ossified  at  the 
symphysis,  and  the  specimen  under  consideration  was  broken  off  just  to  the 
left  of  the  latter.  The  chin  is  narrow  and  convex  transversely,  and  it  forms 
a  nearly  straight  or  slightly  convex  slope  of  about  45°.  The  body  of  the 
bone  is  nearly  of  uniform  depth;  the  relation  of  depth  to  length  being  much 
greater  than  in  the  raccoon  and  more  in  proportion  witli  the  measurements 
in  the  hog  and  peccary.  The  outer  flice  of  the  body  is  nearly  vertical.  I'he 
base  is  thick  and  slightly  convex  fore  and  aft.  Near  the  middle,  directed  in- 
wardly, it  exhibits  a'strong  impression  tor  muscular  attachment. 

The  angle  of  the  jaw,  the  back  border  of  the  bone,  and  the  coronoid  pro- 
cess ai'e  lost.  The  outer  face  of  the  ascending  portion  of  the  ramus  is 
depressed  into  a  masseteric  fossa  extending  nearly  or  quite  to  the  base,  but 
shallow  compared  with  that  of  ordinary  carnivores.  The. condyle  is  remark- 
ably slioi't,  and  resembles  that  of  some  of  the  monkeys  more  than  that  of  ordinary 
pachyderms.  It  is  transversely  oval,  with  the  l^readth  less  than  twice  the 
fore  and  aft  diameter,  which  is  directed  obliquely  from  without  inward  and 
backward.  The  articular  surface  is  transversely  convex  and  inclines  more 
outwardly  than  inward. 

The  form  of  the  condyle  clearly  indicates  more  varied  movements  in  the 
jaw  than  exists  in  the  carnivora,  and  would  rather  be  favorable  to  the  proper 
reduction  of  the  food  of  an  omnivorous  animal. 

A  mental  foramen  occupies  a  position  about  mi<lway  between  the  third 


89 

premolar  ami   lliu  base  ol   the  jaw.     Twu  small  loramiiia  arc  situak'd  IjcIow 
the  position  of  the  first  premolar. 

Ill  the  American  Journal  of  Science  for  1871,  Professor  Marsh  has 
described  the  lower  jaw,  with  teeth,  of  a  small  pachyderm,  under  the  name  of 
Limnotherium  tyrannus,  which  would  appear  at  least  to  belong  to  the  same 
genus  as  the  former.  The  specimen  was  found  near  Dry  Creek,  Wyoming. 
According  to  the  description  and  measurements,  the  jaw  nearly  accords  with 
that  of  Notharctus  tenebrosus.  The  teeth  in  an  interrupted  series  consist  of 
two  incisors,  a  canine,  four  premolars,  and  three  molars.  If  we  suppose 
Notharctus  to  have  two  incisors,  the  numljer,  character,  and  relative  position 
of  the  teeth  agree  in  both.  In  Limnotherium  the  first  and  second  premolars 
are  observed  to  have  a  single  fang.  This  character  alone  would  be  insufficient 
to  distinguish  a  genus,  and,  perhaps,  would  hardly  be  regarded  as  a  specific 
character.  The  description  of  the  molars  of  Limnotherium  would  apply  to 
those  of  Notharctus. 

The  measurements  of  the  lower-jaw  specimen  o?  Notharctus  tenebrosus  are 
as  follows : 

Liucs. 

Leugtli  of  jaw  from  condyle  to  incisive  alveoli 30 

Depth  of  jaw  below  last  molar 5^ 

Depth  of  jaw  below  last  premolar C 

Length  of  symphysis '^ 

Breadth  of  condyle j 

Anteroposterior  diameter  of  condyle 2 

Length  of  dental  series - 19^ 

Length  of  space  occupied  by  the  molar  series Iti 

Length  of  space  occupied  by  the  true  molars S^ 

Diameter  of  canine  at  base  of  crown 1| 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  second  premolar li 

Transverse  diameter  of  second  premolar f 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  third  premolar If 

Transverse  diameter  of  third  premolar li 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  fourth  premolar 2 

Transverse  diameter  of  fourth  i)remolar l-J 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  first  molar 2f 

Transverse  diameter  of  first  molar ,   2 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  second  molar ^ ~'i 

Transverse  diameter  of  second  molar 2 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  third  molar 3^ 

Transverse  diameter  of  third  molar 2 

In  numy  respects  the  lower  jaw  of  Notharctus  resembles  that  of  some  of 
the  existing  American   monkeys  quite  as  much  as  it  docs  that  of  any  oi  the 
living  pachyderms.     Notharctus  agrees  witli  most  of  tiie  American  monkeys 
12g 


e 


90 

ill  tlie  union  of  llie  rami  of  tlie  jaw  at  the  sj'inpliysis,  in  the  small  size  of  the 
condyle,  in  the  crowded  condition  of  the  teeth,  and  iu  the  number  of  incisors, 
canines,  and  true  molars,  wliich  are  also  nearly  alike  in  constitution.  Notharc- 
tus  possesses  one  more  premolar  and  the  othei's  have  a  pair  of  fangs.  The 
resemblance  is  so  close  that  but  little  change  would  be  necessary  to  evolve 
from  the  jaw  and  teeth  of  Notharctus  that  of  a  modern  monkey.  The  same 
condition  which  would  lead  to  the  suppression  of  a  first  premolar,  in  continu- 
ance would  reduce  the  fangs  of  the  other  premolars  to  a  single  one.  This 
change,  with  a  concomitant  shortening  and  increase  of  depth  of  the  jaw,  would 
give  the  characters  of  a  living  Cebus.  A  further  reduction  of  a  single  premo- 
lar would  give  rise  to  the  condition  of  the  jaw  in  the  Old  World  apes  and  man. 

IIIPPOSYUS. 

HlPPOSYUS  FOEMOSUS. 

Several  small  fragments  of  jaws  with  teeth,  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  in 
the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger,  are  suspected  to  belong  to  a  different  genus  of 
pachyderms  from  any  of  those  indicated  in  the  jjreceding  pages.  One  of  the 
specimens  consists  of  an  upper-jaw  fragment  with  the  molars  in  a  mutilated 
condition.  The  first  and  second  molars  are  the  l)est  preserved,  and  are  rep- 
resented in  Fig.  41,  Plate  VI,  magnified  three  diameters.  The  first  one  is 
nearly  entire,  but  in  the  figure  is  represented  in  a  restored  condition  by  the 
addition  of  the  antero-external  angle  marked  l:)y  the  zigzag  black  line. 

The  upper  molars  bear  a  general  resemblance  in  the  construjction  of  their 
crowns  to  those  of  Anchitherium.  The  outer  lobes  are  like  those  in  the  lat- 
ter, but  have  their  outer  buttress-like  ridges  proportionately  thicker.  The 
antero-intei-nal  lobe  is  larger  than  that  behind  and  conjoins  it.  In  Anchitherium 
the  inner  lobes  are  nearly  equal  and  isolated  from  each  other.  The  antero- 
median lobe,  as  existing  in  Anchitherium,  in  the  present  fossil  is  completely 
connate  as  part  of  the  antero-internal  lobe,  and  the  postero-median  lobe  of 
the  former  is  nearly  obsolete,  or  appears  as  a  mere  rudiment  in  Hipposyus. 
A  strong  basal  ridge  incloses  the  crown  in  front,  behind,  and  internally,  but 
is  absent  in  Anchitherium  in  the  latter  position. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows: 

Lines. 

Space  occupied  by  the  three  molars T^i 

Breadth  of  first  molar ^i 

Breadth  of  second  molar ' oa 

■"4- 

Breadth  of  third  molar , 2i 

Width  of  first  molar  transversely 3i 


91 

The  other  specimens  aeeompanyiiig  the  tbnner,  and  siisixTled  lo  Ixdoiig  to 
the  same  species,  consist  of  fragments  of  three  lower  jaws,  containing  each 
one  or  two  molar  teeth.  One  of  the  specimens  contains  the  first  and  second 
molars  and  the  remains  of  the  last  one.  The  portion  of  jaw  is  like  the  corre-. 
sponding  portion  in  Notharctus,  but  is  thicker  and  the  teeth  are  stouter.  The 
teeth  are  considerably  worn,  as  represented  in  the  view  of  the  triturating  sur- 
face of  the  second  molai-  in  Fig.  38,  Plate  VI,  magnified  two  diameters.  The 
crown  is  ol)long  square,  and  consists  of  two  divisions,  each  of  which,  in  tlie 
unworn  condition,  presented  au  acute  crescentoid  summit  In  the  abraded 
condition  the  divisions  present  two  broad,  semi-lunar  tracts  of  dentine  con- 
tinuous with  each  other.  The  tracts  embrace,  internally,  shallow  enameled 
recesses,  of  which  the  posterior  is  much  the  larger.  The  contiguous  horns 
of  the  tracts  are  continuous  upon  a  tubercle  at  the  inner  part  of  .the  crown 
just  in  advance  of  the  middle.  The  posterior  horn  of  the  posterior  crescent 
is  likewise  continuous,  with  a  tubercle  at  the  postero-internal  angle  of  tlie 
crown.  Externally  the  latter  is  bounded  by  a  basal  ridge,  and  an  element  of 
the  same  occupies  the  postero-internal  angle  of  the  crown. 

Measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows : 

Liues. 

Depth  of  jaw  below  the  middle  molar    i'>^ 

Space  occupied  by  the  three  molars •• 

Breadth  of  crowu  of  first  molar 2 J 

Width  of  crown  of  first  molar 2 

Breadth  of  crown  of  second  molar ....'. ^  3 

Width  of  crowu  of  secoud  molar 2^ 

A  second  specimen  consists  of  a  nearly  corresponding  portion  of  another 
jaw  containing  the  first  and  second  molars.  The  jaw-fragment  is  of  greater 
depth  than  in  the  former,  but  otherwise  is  about  as  robust,  and  the  teeth  are 
nearly  of  the  same  size.     The  measurements  are  as  follows: 

Liues. 

Depth  of  jaw  below  middle  molar Sf 

Breadth  of  crown  of  first  molar 23- 

Width  of  crown  of  first  molar "  2^ 

Breadth  of  crown  of  second  molar 2^ 

Width  of  crowu  of  second  molar 2J 

Two  additional  specimens  consist  of  portions  of  both  rami  of  the  lower  jaw 
of  a  younger  animal  than  the  preceding,  but  only  one  contains  a  single  tooth, 
the  first  molar,  which  is  represented  in  Fig.  39,  Plate  VI,  magnified  two 
diameters.     The  rami  of  the  jaw  are  of  more  slender  proportions  than  indicated 


92 

hy  the  fragments  above  descril)ed,  but  are  nearly  as  thick ;  and  the  retained 
tooth  is  of  the  same  size  and  form  as  its  fellow  in  the  fragments  of  older  jaws. 

One  of  the  rami  contains  the  fangs  of  the  complete  molar  series,  together 
with  part  of  the  canine  alveolus,  which  is  close  to  the  former.  The  number 
of  premolars  I  cannot  determine  with  certaintJ^  If  tliree,  the  first  of  the 
series  is  larger  than  the  second,  and  has  its  fangs  more  widely  separated.  If 
the  number  is  four,  the  anterior  two  have  each  a  single  fang. 

Perhaps  the  latter  is  the  true  condition,  which  accords  with  that  attributed 
to  Limnotherium  by  Professor  Marsh. 

Three  vasculo-neural  foramina  are  situated  at  the  outer  part  of  the  ramus: 
one  just  back  of  the  position  of  the  canine  alveolus ;  a  second  below  the 
interval  of  the  back  two  premolars,  and  the  third  beneath  the  first  molar.  In 
the  opposite  ramus  the  latter  is  below  the  last  premolar,  and  it  occupies  the 
same  i)osition  in  the  former  two  specimens. 

The  first  molar  tooth  retained  in  one  of  the  rami  agrees  with  the  descrip- 
lion  of  those  in  the  older  jaw-fragments.  Fig.  38,  Plate  VI,  represents  the 
right  second  molar  much  worn  ;  and  Fig.  39  represents  the  first  left  molar 
in  a  much  less  abraded  condition. 

Measurements  from  the  two  rami  of  the  lower  jaw  just  described  are  as 
follows : 

Lilies. 

Space  occupied  by  the  premolar  aud  molar  series IGJ 

Space  occupied  by  tbe  molar  series 9 

Depth  of  jaw  below  the  premolars   5 

Depth  of  jaw  below  the  middle  molar 4| 

Breadth  of  the  first  molar 3 

Width  of  the  first  molar 2^ 

Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  XXVII,  represent  a  specimen  of  a  tooth  recently  discov- 
ered by  Dr.  Carter  on  Grizzly  Buttes.  It  appears  to  be  a  first  upper  true 
molar  of  Hippcmjus  formosus,  and  is  scarcely  worn.  It  was  found  isolated 
and  unaccompanied  by  any  other  pieces  which  could  be  reasonably  atti-ibuted 
to  the  same  animal.  From  the  comparative  perfection  of  its  crown,  its  con- 
stitution is  more  evident.  It  resembles  in  miniature  the  corresponding  teeth 
of  Anchitherium,  and  ditfers  especially  in  the  less  proportionate  development 
of  the  median  lobes  of  the  crown,  in  the  greater  degree  of  production  of  the 
basal  ridge,  in  the  more  intimate  union  of  the  inner  lobes  and  their  more 
sloping  character  externally,  in  the  more  isolated  condition  of  the  postero- 
median lobe  from  the  contiguous  inner  one,  and  in  the  more  wrinkled  condi- 


93 

tion  of  all  the  lobes  approaching  the  base  of  the  crown.  The  transverse 
diameter  of  the  latter  is  J  of  an  inch;  its  fore  and  aft  diameter  externally  ^ 
of  an  inch. 

HiPPOSYUS  ROBUSTIOR. 

A  lower-jaw  fragment  containing  a  single  tooth,  obtained  by  Professor 
Hayden  on  Henry's  Fork  of  Green  River,  apparently  indicates  a  more  robust 
■species  of  the  same  genus  as  the  former.  I  at  first  attributed  the  specimen 
to  a  species  of  Notharctus,  with  the  name  of  JV.  rohustior,  but  a  comparison 
of  the  tooth,  represented  in  Fig.  40,  Plate  VI,  with  those  o'i  Hipposyus  fonno- 
sus,  Figs.  38,  39,  will  at  once  suggest  the  probability  of  its  pertaining  to  a 
larger  species  of  the  latter  genus.  Perhaps'  the  specimen  may  belong  to  a 
more  robust  individual  of  the  same  species. 

The  jaw-fragment  is  too  imperfect  to  ascertain  anything  in  regard  to  its 
anatomical  characters  other  than  its  thickness.  Below  the  second  molar  it  is 
J  of  an  inch  thick;  in  the  specimens  attributed  to  H.  formosus  it  ranges  in  the 
same  position  from  34^  to  3J  lines  in  thickness.  The  second  molar  tooth  is 
3i  lines  broad  and  2^  lines  wide. 

Order  Prohoscidea  ? 

Large  quadrupeds  with  fivettoes  to  the  feet ;  molar  teeth  with  transverse 
ridges;  femur  without  a  third  trochanter;  nose  prolonged  into  a  cylindrical 
trunk  or  proboscis. 

UINTATHERIUM. 

While  encamped  in  Dry  Creek  Cafion,  forty  miles  to  the  east  of  Fort 
Bridger,  Drs.  Carter  and  Corson  spent  a  day  in  traversing  a  most  desolate 
region  to  some  buttes  about  ten  miles  farther  to  the  east.  They  returned  to 
camp  after  sundown  laden  with  fossils,  among  which  were  the  remains  of  the 
largest  animal  which  had  yet  been  brought  to  our  notice  from  the  Bridger 
Tertiary  beds.  '^J^hese  remains  consist  of  the  cranial  portion  of  a  skull  with 
fragments  of  both  jaws  attached  to  the  same  matrix,  a  nearly  complete  arm- 
bone,  and  fragments  of  other  limb-bones.  A  notice  of  these  remains,  attrib- 
uted to  a  pachyderm  with  the  name  of  Uintathcrium  rohustum,  was  com- 
municated in  a  letter  to  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia, 
and  was  published  August  1,  1872. 

On  the  jJrevious  day  to  the  discovery  of  the  remains  of  Uintatherium, 
while  engaged  in  the  search  for  fossils   along  the  buttes,  al)ou(  a  mile  to  the 


94 

east  of  our  camp,  Dr.  Corson  called  my  attention  to  a  large  tusk  which  he  had 
found  mingled  with  some  drift-pebbles  that  had  tldlen  from  the  top  of  the 
butte.  In  the  tusk  I  thought  I  recognized  the  canine  of  a  large  carnivore 
related  to  the  extinct  saber-toothed  tiger  of  Brazil.  On  further  search,  we 
iound  a  j)ortion  of  the  opposite  tusk,  an  isolated  molar  supposed  to  belong  to 
Uintatherium,  another  of  Palseosyops,  and  the  scale  of  a  ganoid  fish. 

In  tlie  same  letter  above  mentioned,  the  large  tusks  were  described  and 
attributed  to  a  carnivore  with  tiie  name  of  Uintamastix  atrox. 

On  our  return  to  Fort  Bridger,  while  examining  and  discussing  the  fossils 
collected  in  our  expedition,  the  question  arose  whether  the  large  tusks  did  not 
pertain  to  the  same  animal  I  have  named  Uintatherium.  Our  specimen  of 
the  skull  of  the  latter  did  not  assist  the  determination  of  the  question,  as  the 
facial  portion  was  wanting,  excepting  small  fragments  of  the  back  of  the  jaws 
containing  the  last  molar  teeth.  While  admitting  the  probability  of  the  tusks 
pertaining  to  Uintatherium,  from  their  being  so  unlike  those  of  any  known 
pachyderm,  and  from  their  near  resemblance,  both  in  form  and  size,  to  ihose 
of  the  great  extinct  Machairodus  of  Brazil,  I  thought  the  weight  of  evidence 
was  in  favor  of  their  reference  to  a  carnivore.  The  finding  of  a  molar  tooth 
of  Uintatherium  in  association  with  the  tusks  appeared  to  me  not  to  outweigh 
this  evidence  any  more  than  the  association  with  them  of  a  molar  of  Palgeo- 
syops. 

Professor  Marsh  has  published  several  notices  in  the  American  Journal  of 
Science  of  the  remains  of  large  mammals  from  the  Bridger  Tertiary  forma- 
tion, which  appear  to  be  related  with  Uintatherium. 

In  June,  1S71,  he  reported  the  discovery  of  bones  of  a  large  animal  which 
he  referred  with  doubt  to  Titanotherium,  with  the  name  of  T.  anceps.  From 
some  additional  remains,  in  a  foot-note  of  July  22,  1872,  he  refers  them  to  a 
proboscidean  under  the  name  of  Mastodon  anceps.  This  is  corrected  in  an 
erratum  of  August  19,  referring  the  animal  to  a  new  genus  with  the  name 
of  Tinoceras  anceps.  September  21,  he  j^ublishcd  a  notice  of  a  new  species 
with  the  name  of  Tinoceras  grandis,  founded  on  portions  of  a  skull  and  teeth, 
&c.  Of  this  he  observes,  "  The  skull  is  proportionately  very  small,  and  indi- 
cates one  of  the  most  remarkable  animals  yet  discovered.  It  sujiports  a  pair 
of  short  horns,  and  has  also  two  powerful  tnsks,  which,  in  size,  shape,  and 
direction,  resemble  the  canines  of  the  walrus." 

More  recently,  September  27,  Professor  ]\Iarsh  has  published  a  "notice  of 
son>e  remarkable  fossil  mammals,"  which  are  referred  to  two  species  of  a  new 


95 

genus  with  the  names  of  D'mocerus  vurahiLh  and  I),  lacusttis.  OC  tin;  skull 
ot  this  genus,  he  observes  that  it  presents  a  most  remarkable  combination  of 
cliaracters.  "It  is  wedge-shaped,  elongated,  and  <|uite  narrow,  especially  in 
front,  aiul  was  armed  with  horns  and  huge  decurved  canine  tnsks.  The  tt)p 
of  the  skull,  moreover,  is  deeply  concave,  and  has  around  its  lateral  and  pos- 
terior margins  an  enormous  crest.  On  the  frontal  bones,  above  the  orbits, 
and  in  advance  of  the  lateral  crest,  there  is  a  pair  of  very  large  horn-cones, 
just  behind  and  above  the  canines.  These  are  directed  upward  and  outward, 
and  their  summits  are  obtuse  and  nearly  round.  They  are  solid,  except  at 
the  base,  wdiich  is  perforated  by  the  upper  extremity  of  the  canine.  Near 
the  anterior  margin  of  the  nasals  there  is  still  another  pair  of  horn-cones, 
which  are  near  together,  and  have  obliquely  compressed  summits.  The  nasal 
opening  is  small.  The  premaxillaries  are  slender  and  without  teeth.  The 
upper  canines  are  greatly  elongated,  slightly  curved,  and  compressed  longi- 
tudinally. The  lower  portion  is  thin  and  trenchant.  Behind  the  canine  is  a 
long  diastema,  t-bllowed  by  a  series  of  six  small  teeth.  The  molars  have  their 
crowns  composed  of  two  transverse  ridges,  separated  externally,  and  meeting 
at  the  inner  extremities.  The  skull  measures  about  28i  inches  long  and  8^ 
inches  in  width  over  the  orbits.  The  canine  is  9:^  inches  in  length  below 
the  jaw,  G4  millimeters  in  longitudinal  diameter  at  base,  and  25  millimeters 
in  transverse  diameter.  The  last  upper  molar  has  an  antero-posterior  diameter 
of  36  millimeters." 

It  appears  to  me  that  the  brief  description  of  the  skull  and  molar  teeth  of 
Dinoceras  applies  so  closely  to  the  corresponding  parts  of  Uintatherium  as 
to  render  it  probable  they  are  of  the  same  genus.  The  description  of  the 
tusks  of  the  former  also  equally  well  apply  to  those  of  Uintamastix,  so  as  to 
lead  me  to  suspect  that  this  may  likewise  be  the  same  as  Uintatherium.  It 
is  probable,  too,  that  should  the  latter  not  be  the  same  as  Dinoceras  it  may 
prove  to  be  the  same  as  Tinoceras,  or  perhaps  the  Eobasileus  s.  Loxolophodon 
of  Professor  Co]^)e. 

The  characters  of  Uintatherium,  as  expressed  in  the  material  at  our  com- 
mand, are  so  peculiar  and  unlike  those  of  any  other  known  animal  as  to  ren- 
der its  ordinal  affinities  obscure.  From  the  form  and  constitution  of  the 
molar  teeth  alone,  I  should  have  viewed  the  genus  as  pertaining  to  the  odd- 
toed  pachyderms.  If  the  remains  noticed  by  Professor  Marsh  under  the 
name  of  Dinoceras  belong  to  the  same  animal,  the  presence  of  horns  in  pairs 
to  the  head  would   render  such   a  reference   improbable.     Professor  Marsh 


96 

observes  of  Diiioceras  and  the  related  Tinoccras,  that  they  have  the  vertebral 
and  limb  bones  very  similar  to  those  of  recent  proboscideans,  but  refers  them 
to  a  new  order  vvitli  the  name  of  Dinocerea. 

The  form  of  tlie  thigh-bone  and  the  short  tarsal  bones  of  Uintatherinm 
\\ould  appear  to  indicate  limbs  and  feet  most  nearly  constructed  like  those  of 
the  elephant.  I  have  provisionally  placed  the  animal  in  the  order  of  Probos- 
cidea,  leaving  to  Professor  Marsh  the  determination  of  its  true  position  from 
the  more  abundant  materials  at  his  command. 

UlNTATHERIUM    KOBUSTTIM. 

The  remains  which  are  specially  to  be  regarded  as  characteristic  of  the 
animal  above  named,  and  from  which  it  was  originally  indicated,  consist  of  a 
mutilated  cranium,  to  the  matrix  of  which  there  adhere'd  portions  of  both 
jaws,  containing  all  the  last  molars  and  an  isolated  molar.  A  nearly  com- 
plete humerus,  together  with  some  less  well  preserved  specimens  found  in 
association  with  the  former,  are  supposed  to  have  pertained  to  the  same 
individual. 

A  small  fragment  of  the  upper  jaw,  containing  the  last  molar  tooth,  is  rep- 
resented in  Fig.  8,  Plate  XXV.  The  tooth,  also  represented  in  Figs.  6,  7, 
of  the  same  plate,  and  Fig.  30,  Plate  XXVII,  has  the  crown  composed 
of  a  pair  of  wide  pyramidal  lobes  projecting  from  a  broad  expanded  base. 
The  lobes  extend  across  the  crown,  conjoining  internally  and  diverging  ex- 
ternally in  a  V-like  manner.  They  project  at  their  outer  extremities  in  promi- 
nent points,  and  also  form  together  a  prominent  point  at  their  conjunction 
internally.  The  outer  extremity  of  the  anterior  lobe  is  the  most  prominent 
of  the  three  points  of  the  crown.  The  outer  extremity  of  the  posterior 
Iol)e  is  the  least  prominent  of  the  three  points,  while  that  at  the  conjunc- 
tion of  the  lobes  is  scarcely  more  so.  The  acute  summits  of  the  lobes 
between  the  points  arc  transversely  concave,  and  are  worn  off  on  their  anterior 
slope  so  as  to  present  narrow  tracts  of  exposed  dentine.  The  posterior  slope 
of  the  lobes  is  slightly  concave ;  and  the  valley  between  them  is  triangular, 
and  opens  outwardly. 

From  the  posterior  slope  of  the  inner  part  of  the  back  lobe  of  the  crown 
there  projects  a  rounded  tubercle  about  half-way  between  the  basal  ridge  and 
the  pointed  conjunction  of  the  lobes.  A  second  rounded  tubercle  occupies 
the  entrance  of  the  triangular  valley  between  the  lobes. 

A  stout  basal   ridge  embraces  the  crown   in   front  and  behind,  and   in  a 


97 

reduced  condition  continues  interruptedly  on  the  inner  and  outer  parts.  In 
"outline  the  base  of  the  crown  is  ovoidal,  with  the  narrower  extremity  corre- 
sponding with  the  outer  part  of  the  anterior  lobe.  The  tooth  is  inserted  by 
a  pair  of  fangs  widely  compressed,  conical,  and  convergent  internally.  The 
transverse  diameter  of  the  crown  of  the  last  upper  molar  is  20  lines ;  its  fore 
and  aft  diameter  is  nearly  18  lines.  Tlie  description  of  the  upper  molars  of 
Dinoccras  mirabilis,  and  the  size  of  the  last  one,  as  given  by  Professor  Marsh, 
so  well  apply  to  the  tooth  above  described  as  to  lead  me  to  suspect  that  the 
animal  so  named  is  the  same  as  Uintatherium  rohustum. 

The  fragments  of  both  sides  of  the  lower  jaw  of  the  latter,  represented  in 
Fig.  11,  Plate  XXV,  and  Figs.  32,  33,  Plate  XXVII,  contain  the  last  molar  tooth, 
also  represented  in  Figs.  9,  10,  of  the  former  plate,  and  Fig.  31  of  the  latter. 
The  tooth  has  an  oblong  square  crown,  rounded  at  the  corners  and  moderately 
constricted  at  the  middle  laterally.  It  is  inserted  in  the  jaw  by  a  pair  of 
wide,  compressed  conical  fangs. 

The  crown  is  composed  of  three  lobes,  with  oblique  intervening  valleys, 
which  receive  the  pair  of  lobes  of  the  corresponding  upper  tooth  when  closed 
upon  the  lower  one. 

The  anterior  lobe  forms  nearly  half  the  crown,  and  rises  internally  in  a 
point,  which  is  the  most  prominent  part  of  the  tooth.  The  front  and  back 
surfaces  are  sloping,  and  the  former  is  transversely  concave,  and  bounded  by 
a  short,  oblique  basal  ridge.  The  inner  and  outer  surfaces  of  the  extremities 
are  convex,  and  extend  to  the  bottom  of  the  crown.  The  acute  summit 
curves  downward  and  outwai'd  from  the  inner  point.  It  is  worn  off  on  the 
posterior  slope  with  a  more  forward  direction  externally,  and  exhibits  a  nar- 
row tract  of  exposed  dentine.  The  prominent  point  of  the  inner  extremity 
is  notched  just  below  the  summit  postero-internally. 

The  posterior  and  middle  lobes  of  the  crown  are  nearly  of  the  same  size 
and  prominence.  The  posterior  lobe  is  separated  from  the  anterior  lobe 
internally  by  a  deep,  angular  notch,  and  diverges  from  it  externally.  It 
forms  the  posterior  convex  surface  of  the  crown,  and  has  an  anterior  sloping 
surface  defined  from  it  by  a  ridge  curving  from  the  inner  side  backward  and 
outward,  and  then  becoming  continuous,  with  a  basal  ridge  sweeping  down- 
ward to  the  bottom  of  the  middle  lobe  of  the  crown  externally.  The  middle 
lobe  appears  like  an  ovoidal  wedge  introduced  from  the  outer  side,  and  sepa- 
rating the  anterior  and  posterior  lobes.     Its  summit  is  worn  off  with  a  slight 

posterior  slope,  and  exhibits  an  exposed  tract  of  dentine. 
13g 


98 

A  thill,  incoiispiciious  basal  ridge  occupies  the  inner  half  of  the  liack  part 
of  (lie  crown  ;  a  thicker  festoon  extends  from  the  summit  of  the  posterior 
lobe  externally  to  the  bottom  of  the  middle  lobe ;  and  a  short,  prominent 
ledge  occupies  the  middle  of  the  front  of  the  crown. 

The  fore  and  aft  diameter  of  the  crown  of  the  last  lower  molar  is  1^  inches; 
the  transverse  diameter  in  front  is  14  lines;  behind,  12^  lines. 

Associated  with  the  other  specimens  referred  to  Uiutatherium,  there  was 
found  the  isolated  tooth  represented  in  Fig.  12,  which  I  suppose  to  be  a  tirst 
upper  molar.  It  has  the  same  constitution  as  the  last  upper  molar  above 
described,  but  is  smaller.  In  the  present  condition  of  the  crown,  the  poste- 
rior lobe  is  more  prominent  than  the  anterior,  and  it  exhibits  a  broad  horseshoe- 
shaped  exposed  tract  of  dentine  extending  upon  the  summits  of  both  lobes. 
The  dentinal  surface  is  concave  from  side  to  side,  and  inclines  forward.  The 
outer  extremity  of  the  anterior  lobe,  broken  in  the  specimen,  is  considerably 
thicker  than  that  of  the  posterior  lobe.  Back  of  the  inner  conjunction  of  the 
lobes,  just  below  the  summit,  the  rounded  tubercle  is  visible,  such  as  exists 
in  a  corresjionding  position  in  the  last  molar.  It  is  worn  so  as  to  exhibit  a 
small  circular  islet  of  dentine. 

The  basal  ridge,  as  in  the  last  upper  molar,  is  thick  in  front  and  behind, 
but  feeble  upon  the  inner  and  outer  sides. 

The  first  molar  was  inserted  by  a  pair  of  fangs.  The  antero-posterior 
diameter  of  the  crown  is  16  lines  ;  the  transverse  diameter  at  the  hinder  lobe 
is  15i  lines. 

The  upper  molars  of  Uintatherium  above  described,  bear  considerable 
resemblance  to  the  last  upper  molar  of  Lophiodon  lidrisiense,  as  represented 
in  Fig.  3,  Plate  XVII  of  Gervais's  Paleontologie.  They  differ  especially  in 
the  absence  of  the  offset  from  the  middle  of  the  anterior  part  of  the  front  lobe 
of  the  crown. 

The  upper  molar  teeth,  attributed  by  Gervais  to  L.  parisicm^e,  represented 
in  his  Figs.  3,  4,  so  nearly  resemble  the  corresponding  teeth  of  Uintatherium 
and  so  decidedly  differ  from  those  of  Lophiodon,  as  characterized  from  the 
typical  species  L.  isselense,  that  it  may  be  questioned  whether  it  belongs  to 
the  same  genus.  The  characters  presented  by  the  teeth  referred  to  L.  parisi- 
ense,  are  suthcicntly  distinct  and  well  marked  to  consider  them  as  indicating 
a  genus  differing  from  Lophiodon  and  Uintatherium,  and  probably  more  nearly 
related  with  the  latter  than  the  former. 


9!) 

The  cranium  of  Uiiilaihcruiiu,  represented  in  Fig.  1,  Plulc  XXVI,  is  of 
rcnuirkablc  form  and  unlike  tliat  of  any  other  known  animal.  The  specimen, 
though  much  mutilated,  is  yet  sufficiently  well  preserved  to  give  us  sonic 
notion  of  the  peculiarities  of  the  skull. 

The  top  of  the  cranium  presents  a  deep  basin-like  concavity  separated  on 
each  side  from  the  temporal  fossfe  l)y  a  wide  projecting  crest.  The  entire 
extent  ot"  tliis  cannot  be  determined  from  the  broken  condition  of  its  edirc  in 
the  specimen,  l)ut  on  one  side  it  projects  obliquely  outward  and  upward  for 
three  inches  beyond  the  inner  surface  of  the  temporal  fossa.  Posteriorly,  the 
crest  is  continuous  with  a  thick  broken  border  extending  across  the  top  of 
the  occiput  so  as  to  make  it  api)ear  as  if  the  lateral  projections  of  the 
cranium  were  continuous  behind.  The  depth  of  the  supra-cranial  hollow  in 
the  specimen  is  upward  of  several  inches,  and  was,  no  doubt,  greater  in  the 
complete  skull. 

The  temporal  fossa  is  a  long  deep  concavity  overarched  by  the  wide  lateral 
crest  separating  it  from  the  supra-cranial  hollow.  Its  lower  part  spreads  out- 
wardly on  a  l:)road  ledge  extending  from  the  lateral  occipital  border  forward 
upon  the  upper  surface  of  the  zygomatic  root.  This  ledge  resembles  the 
long  extension  backward  of  the  zygomatic  root  in  the  bear,  and  in  like  man- 
ner it  projects  over  the  auditory  archway  and  the  contiguous  processes. 

From  the  fractured  condition  of  the  specimen,  I  am  unable  to  ascertain  the 
])osition  of  the  squamous  suture,  and  this  may  be  said  also  of  other  sutures. 
The  temporal  surface  as  formed  Ijy  the  squamosal  plate  and  the  iieighb(jring 
portion  of  the  parietal  is  pierced  with  a  number  of  large  vascular  foramina. 
The  occipital  surface  is  broad,  and  it  slopes  inwardly  from  above  to  the  occi- 
pital foramen. 

The  large  condyles  project  strongly  backward  and  downward,  and  are  not 
in  the  least  degree  sessile,  but  well  defined  from  the  occipital  surfiace  by  a 
deep  groove.  Their  articular  surface  is  broad,  being  within  a  fourth  as  great 
as  the  depth,  and  the  flexure  near  its  middle  appears  less  pVonounced  than 
usvial.  The  articular  surfaces  are  not  prolonged  below  on  the  basi-occipital, 
and  the  condyles  in  this  position  are  separated  by  a  deep  notch  twenty  lines 
from  each  other. 

The  basilar  process  is  broad  and  thick,  and  moderately  tapering.  Its  undcM- 
surface  is  transversely  convex,  especially  antericn-ly.  On  each  side  ol  tlie 
middle  it  presents  a  broad  rough  eminence  for  muscular  attachment. 


100 


The  relative  positions  of  the  paramastoid  and  mastoid  processes,  the  audi- 
tory archway,  and  the  post-glenoid  tubercle  are  nearly  the  same  as  in  feline 
animals,  but  here  the  resemblance  ceases. 

The  paramastoid  process  is  a  comparatively  slight  roughened  eminence, 
situated  just  above  and  external  to  the  position  of  the  fore  part  of  the  con- 
tiguous condyle.  It  is  separated  from  the  mastoid  process  by  an  archway 
directed  inward  and  forward  to  the  space  usually  occupied  by  a  tympanic 
bone,  but  whicli  in  the  specimen  is  filled  with  the  matrix  of  the  fossil. 

The  mastoid  process,  though  much  broader  and  longer  than  the  paramastoid, 
does  not  project  so  much  downward  as  the  occipital  condyle.  It  is  semicir- 
cular below  and  roughened,  and  is  compressed  from  without  inwardly.  Its 
outer  surface  presents  a  median  fossa  at  the  base. 

The  auditory  archway  expands  outwardly  in  a  funnel,  and  below  is 
partially  contracted  by  a  short  ledge,  a  process  of  the  tympanic,  projecting 
from  the  mastoid  process. 

The  root  of  the  zygoma  is  of  great  strength,  and  has,  projecting  downward 
from  it,  a  post-glenoid  tubercle  of  extraordinary  size.  The  process  is  2^ 
inches  in  width,  and  projects  externally  in  a  rounded  knob.  Its  lower  part 
forms  a  slightly  irregular  flat  sfirface,  just  above  which,  the  tubercle  is  1^ 
inches  thick.     Its  inner  extremity  slopes  upward  and  inward. 

The  glenoid  articulation  is  transverse,  and  its  surface  straight  in  this  direc- 
tion. Upon  the  post  glenoid  tubercle  the  surface  is  vertical  until  it  curves 
for\yard  and  upward  to  the  anterior  edge  of  the  zygomatic  root.  Its  forward 
extension  is  about  equal  to  that  downward.  The  glenoid  articulation  is  evi- 
dently adapted  especially  to  a  hinge-like  motion,  though  not  so  restricted  as 
that  of  carnivores. 

Measurements  derived  from  the  cranial  specimen  of  Uintatherium  are  as 
follows : 

Incbcs. 

Breadth  of  the  craDium  at  the  outer  part  of  the  post-glenoid  tubercles 10 

Breadth  of  the  crauium  at  the  mastoid  processes 7^ 

Width  of  the  basi-occipital  in  front  of  tbe  occipital  condyles 2^ 

Breadth  of  the  occipital  condyles  together C 

Breadth  of  each  coud\  le 2^ 

Depth  of  each  condyle 3 

Distance  between  the  condyles  or  breadth  of  the  occipital  foramen 2J 

Length  of  the  temporal  fossa  fore  and  aft ■ 7 

Breadth  of  crauium  between  the  temporal  fosste  where  deepest,  about .  -tj 

Depth  of  cranium  from  bottom  of  supra-cranial  basin  to  basi-occipital,  about 4J 


101 

The  lower-jaw  specimens  of  Uintatlierium  are  represented  in  Fijr.  11, 
^late  XXV,  and  Figs.  32,  33,  Plate  XXVII.  Both  contain  the  last  molar,  and 
the  better-preserved  one  also  contains  the  fangs  of  the  preceding  molars  and 
the  last  premolar.  The  space  occupied  by  the  molars  is  4  inches,  which 
appears  small  in  relation  with  the  size  of  the  animal.  The  space  which  was 
occupied  by  the  second  molar  is  nearly  as  broad  as  the  last  molar.  The 
crown  of  this  measures  li  inches.  The  space  which  was  occupied  hy  the 
first  molar  is  little  more  than  three-fourths  of  an  inch,  thus  showing  a  great 
difference  in  the  size  of  the  first,  compared  with  that  of  the  succeeding 
molars. 

The  body  of  the  jaw  is  of  robust  proportions.  Its  depth  beneath  the  fore 
part  of  the  last  molar  is  3^  inches  ;  its  thickness  just  above  the  I'ounded  base 
is  nearly  1^  inches.  A  strong  obtuse  ridge  sweeps  from  the  root  of  the  coro- 
noid  process  downward  and  forward  along  the  base  of  the  jaw  beneath  the 
position  of  the  molars. 

Back  of  the  position  of  the  latter,  the  jaw  bears  more  resemblance  to  the 
corresponding  portion  in  the  great  felines  than  it  does  to  that  of  ordinary 
pachyderms. 

The  coronoid  process  is  a  broad  curved  plate  rising  immediately  in  advance 
of  the  condyle,  as  in  the  lion.  As  in  the  latter,  likewise,  it  is  impressed  ex- 
ternally with  a  deep  masseteric  fossa  extending  below  on  the  body  of  the 
bone,  but  becoming  more  abruptly  shallow  approaching  the  base. 

Tlie  entrance  to  the  dental  canal  is  nearly  on  a  line  with  the  alveolar  bor- 
der, 2^  inches  above  the  base  of  the  jaw. 

The  condyle  is  a  transverse  convexity  2^  inches  in  breadth,  and  rather 
more  than  an  inch  in  width  at  the  middle.  It  is  narrowest  internally,  the  re- 
verse of  the  condition  in  the  lion. 

The  breadth  of  the  jaw  back  of  the  molars  is  estimated  to  be  about  5 
inches  ;  the  breadth  of  the  coronoid  process  at  base  is  about  3  inches. 

The  specimen  of  a  mutilated  atlas,  represented  in  Fig.  2,  Plate  XXVI,  and 
Fig.  34,  Plate  XXVII,  supposed  to  belong  to  Uintatherium,  was  found  by 
the  writer  on  the  buttes  west  of  Dry  Creek  Canon.  It  accords  in  size  with 
the  cranium  of  Uintatherium  above  described,  and  fits  the  occipital  con- 
dyles as  well  as  the  bone  of  one  individual  might  be  expected  to  adapt  itself 
to  that  of  another. 

The  atlas  is  very  unlike  that  of  any  ordinary  familiar  animal.  While  it  is 
much  smaller  than  that  of  a  mastodon,  it  includes  a  canal  of  even  greater 


102 

capacity.  Unlike  tliat  ot"  tlie  animal  just  named,  it  is  quite  circular,  and 
about  3J  inches  in  diameter.  The  portion  occupied  by  the  spinal  cord  is 
absolutely  larger  than  in  the  mastodon,  and  it  is  but  slightly  defined,  from  the 
portion  for  the  pivot  of  the  axis,  by  slight  tubercular  elevations  for  the  trans- 
verse ligament. 

The  atlas  is  proportionately  longer  than  in  the  mastodon,  but  is  of  less 
width.  The  inferior  arch  beneath  is  nearly  flat,  and  without  a  hypapophysis, 
and  on  each  side  presents  a  superficial,  rough  prominence  ["or  muscular 
attachment.  The  neural  ai'ch  is  comparatively  long  and  narrow,  and  appears 
to  be  devoid  of  a  protuberance. 

The  articular  concavities  for  the  occipital  condyles  are  deeper  and  more 
strongly  sloping  than  in  the  mastodon.  They  are  separated  below  by  a  deep 
notch  at  the  fore  part  of  the  inferior  arch.  Above,  they  are  removed  from 
each  other  double  the  distance. 

The  articular  facets  for  the  a.xis  are  ovoidal,  slightly  concave,  and  incline 
at  an  angle  of  nearly  45°.  They  are  separated  below  for  a  couple  of 
inches  by  the  thick  back  liorder  of  the  inferior  arch  of  the  atlas.  Above, 
they  are  separated  by  the  long  semicircular  edge  of  the  neural  arch. 

The  inferior  arch  of  the  atlas-supports  a  facet  for  the  odontoid  process  of 
the  axis,  which  is  distinct  from  the  articular  flxcets  on  each  side  of  the  latter. 

The  transverse  processes  are  unlike  those  of  the  elephant  and  mastodon, 
and  are  more  like  those  in  ordinary  ruminants,  &c.  The  ends  are  broken 
off,  but  they  appear  as  broad,  thick  plates,  extending  fore  and  aft,  though  not 
the  entire  length  in  either  direction. 

The  canal  for  the  vertebral  artery  perforates  the  transverse  jjrocess  fore 
and  aft  from  the  back  half  of  the  upper  to  the  anterior  part  of  the  lower  sur- 
face. As  a  groove,  it  then  turns  upward  in  advance  of  the  root  of  the  trans- 
verse process,  and  is  directed  inward  to  a  canal  perforating  the  neural  arch 
anteriorly  above  the  position  of  the  articular  concavities  for  the  occipital 
condyles. 

Approximative  measurements  of  the  atlas  are  as  follows: 

IncbcB. 

Breadth  between  the  outer  edges  of  the  anterior  articular  concavities (>i| 

Depth  of  the  atlas  posteriorly  from  above  downward 4.J 

Breadth  between  the  outer  edges  of  the  posterior  articular  facets . .  (>i 

Fore  and  aft  extent  of  the  inferior  arch  at  the  middle li 

Length  of  the  atlas  laterally 5 

Diameter  of  spinal  foramen  from  above  downward 'A^ 

Diameter  of  spiual  foramen  transversely ' ^g 

Breadth  fore  and  aft  of  transverse  processes ,  3i 


103 

The  hiunerus  of  Uinlatherium,  of  which  the  aiitorior  view  of  a  sprciinni 
is  given  in  Fig.  3,  Plate  XXVI,  is  very  unlike  that  of"  aii}'  other  tamiliar 
animal.  In  its  peculiarity  of  form  it  presents  no  very  evident  relationship 
with  that  of  the  larger  pachj-derms,  odd  or  even  t(jed,  tlic  proljoscideans,  or 
the  ruminants.  It  is  shorter,  in  proportion  with  its  breadth,  than  in  the 
elephant.  The  shaft  is  narrowest  and  most  nearly  cylindroid  at  the  union  of 
the  upper  two-thirds  wilii  the  lower  third.  The  upper  part  is  prominently  pro- 
duced outwardly  to  support  a  long  triangular  deltoid  tract,  the  point  of  which 
reaches  below  the  middle  of  the  bone.  The  deltoid  surface  loolvs  outwardly 
and  backward,  and  is  nearly  flat,  except  below  where  it  is  depressed.  The 
back  of  the  shaft  presents  a  broad,  nearly  flat  surflice,  dividing  near  the  mid- 
dle in  two  portions,  of  which  one  extends  nearly  straight  downward,  while 
the  other  portion  winds  outward  and  forward  below  the  deltoid  tract  to  the 
front  of  the  distal  extremity. 

The  surface  of  the  shaft  internally  to  the  deltoid  tract  is  wide  and  sloping 
inwardly.  It  is  slightly  depressed  on  the  deltoid  expansion,  but  elsewdiere  is 
nearly  flat  transversely,  and  it  narrows  downward  in  its  extension  to  tlie  in- 
ternal epicondyle. 

The  outer  or  greater  tuberosity  of  the  humerus  and  the  contiguous  portions 
of  the  head  and  deltoid  tract  are  destroyed  in  the  specimen.  The  inner  side 
of  the  head  of  the  bone  presents  a  broad  depressed  tract  rising  on  the  shaft 
Ijelow  in  a  triangular  protubei-ance,  which  answers  to  the  ordinary  internal 
tuberosity  of  the  humerus.  From  the  apex  of  the  angular  protuberance,  a 
ridge  descends  the  shaft  defining  the  inner  or  anterior  aspect  of  the  bone 
from  the  posterior. 

The  head  is  most  convex  from  1)efore  backward,  and  in  this  direction  it 
looks  as  if,  iu  the  complete  condition,  it  had  not  been  greater  than  the  trans- 
verse diameter. 

The  external  epicondyle  is  thick  and  prominent,  but  is  of  comparatively 
little  vertical  extent.  Its  summit  forms  a  thick,  rough  eminence,  extending 
an  inch  externally  to  the  capitulum  and  several  inches  in  width  above  it.  Its 
outer  face  presents  a  l)road  crescentoid  surface  directed  obliquely  outward 
aiul  downward.  It  is  rougii  and  pierced  with  vascular  foramina,  and  is 
divided  into  several  facets  for  the  attachment  of  the  extensors  of  the  lore- 
arm  and  the  external  lateral  ligament. 

The  internal  epicondyle  is  a  comparatively  low,  thick,  and   rough  pntnii- 


104 

nence,  defined  from  the  trochlea  by  a  wide,  pitted  groove.  Its  upper  part  is 
destroyed  in  the  specimen.  Its  l>aclv  part  barely  projects  posterior  to  the 
position  of  the  trochlea. 

Above  the  distal  articulation,  where  the  bone  is  expanded  to  form  the  outer 
epicondyle,  it  is  depressed  into  a  l:)road  and  unusually  deep  concave  fossa. 

The  olecranon  fossa  is  broad  and  moderately  deep,  but  is  not  much  ex- 
tended by  the  protrusion  backward  of  the  epicondyles. 

The  distal  articulation  of  the  humerus  presents  a  well-rounded  capitulum 
on  the  outer  condyle  and  a  broad  trochlea  extending  from  it  on  the  inner 
condyle.  The  capitulum  is  convex  and  narrows  behind  on  a  ridge  separating 
the  posterior  prominence  of  the  outer  epicondyle  from  the  trochlea.  The 
trochlear  groove  is  directed  obliquely  from  the  fossa  in  front  of  the  outer  epi- 
condyle downward  and  inward,  then  backward,  upward,  and  outward  to  the 
olecranon  fossa. 

The  measurements  of  the  bone  are  as  follows  : 

Inches. 

Length  of  the  buinerus  internally 20J 

Width  ti'ansversely  of  the  head 4^ 

Width  of  shaft  at  the  middle  from  the  lower  part  of  the  deltoid  tract  to  the  pos- 

tero-iiiteraal  border i^ 

Thicl;ness  of  shaft  at  middle  of  same  position 2^ 

Circumfereuce  of  narrowest  part  of  shaft 9^ 

Diameter  transversely  of  narrowest  part  of  shaft 2g 

Diameter  autero-posteriorly  of  narrowest  part  of  shaft 3 

Breadth  at  the  epicondyles , ,    , .  -  7f 

Breadth  of  distal  articulation 5^ 

The  mutilated  upper  extremity  of  the  femur,  represented  in  Fig.  4,  Plate 
XXVI,  was  found  by  Dr.  Corson,  on  the  buttes  west  of  Dry  Creek  Caflon, 
a  dozen  miles  from  the  former  specimens.  It  is  suspected  to  pertain  to  Uin- 
tatherium,  though  it  would  ajjpear  to  have  belonged  to  a  larger  animal,  and 
perhaps  a  different  species,  than  the  one  to  wdiich  the  cranium  and  humerus 
are  referred.  The  specimen  has  about  the  same  si^e  and  form  as  the  corre- 
sponding part  in  the  elephant,  but  the  great  trochanter  is  destroyed.  The 
length  of  the  fragment  is  about  11  inches.  The  head  is  5  inches  in  diameter, 
but  its  surface  is  too  much  mutilated  in  the  specimen  to  determine  whether 
it  possessed  a  jtit  for  the  attachment  of  a  round  hgament,  or  whether  it  is 
absent  as  in  recent  proboscideans.  The  outer  border  of  the  shaft  below  the 
position  of  the  great  trochanter  is  2g  inches  thick.     From  the  appearance  of 


105 

the  specimen,  tlie  I'eimir  in   its  entire  condition  luis  evidently  resembled  that 
of  the  elephant  more  than  it  does  that  of  the  perissodactyles. 

The  mutilated  distal  end  of  a  femur,  represented  in  Fig.  5,  is  also  supposed 
to  belong  to  Uintatherium,  though  it  did  not  pertain  to  the  same  individual  as 
the  preceding  specimen.  It  was  found  in  the  same  locality,  but  at  a  distance 
from  the  former,  and  was  derived  from  a  different  stratum,  as  it  has  an  adher- 
ent friable  sandstone  matri.x,  while  the  other  has  an  adherent  indurated  clay 
matrix.  It  is  considerably  smaller  than  the  corresponding  part  of  the  femur 
of  the  elephant,  and  is  very  different  in  anatomical  character.  It  is  propor- 
tionately less  thick.  The  shaft  above  the  articulation,  on  the  front  and  at  the 
sides,  presents  a  continuous  transverse  convexity,  without  any  depression 
whatever  above  the  position  of  the  trochlea.  The  posterior  surface  in  the 
same  direction,  between  the  position  of  the  low  epicondyles,  is  concave. 

The  loss  of  part  of  the  outer  condyle  prevents  a  comparison  of  Ijreadth 
with  the  inner  one,  but  this  is  more  prominent  posteriorly  than  the  former. 
The  trochlea  is  shallow  and  but  feebly  prominent  anteriorly  in  comparison 
with  that  in  the  elephant.  Its  articular  surface  is  continuous  with  that  of 
the  inner  condyle,  and  also  that  of  the  outer  one,  so  far  as  it  is  preserved  in 
the  specimen,  without  the  slightest  definition.  The  intercondyloid  notch 
commences  at  the  bottom  of  the  trochlea  and  gradually  widens  backward  and 
upward  with  a  curve  outward. 

The  length  of  the  fragment  of  the  femur  is  6^  inches.  The  breadth  be- 
tween the  epicondyles  is  about  5  J  inches  ;  the  thickness  of  the  inner  condyle 
and  trochlea  together  is  5  inches,  and  the  depth  of  the  trochlea  along  its 
groove  is  2J  inches. 

Several  large  tarsal  bones,  found  together  on  the  buttes  to  the  west  side  of 
Dry  Creek  Canon,  may  perhaps  belong  to  Uintatherium.  They  consist  of  a 
calcaneum,  astragalus,  and  cuboid  bone  of  the  left  foot,  and  fit  well  enough  to- 
gether to  have  belonged  to  the  same  individual.  In  form  and  2)roportions, 
though  somewhat  peculiar,  they  more  nearly  resemble  those  of  tlie  mastodon 
and  elephant  than  of  other  known  animals. 

The  calcaneum,  of  which  an  upjjer  view,  half-size,  is  given  in  Fig.  6, 
Plate  XXVI,  is  remarkable  for  its  short  robust  character.  The  tuber  calcis, 
in  comparison  with  that  in  the  ordinary  proboscidians,  is  very  short.  The 
breadth  of  the  tuber  exceeds  its  length,  and  the  depth  exceeds  the  breadth. 
The  thickened  extremity  narrows  below  and  is  continuous  with  the  thick 
longitudinal  plantar  ridge.  The  upper  part  of  the  tuber  inclines  nearly 
U  u 


lOG 

slj-aiglit  I)ackwar(l  I'rom  tlie  articulation.  Its  outer  surtace  l()rms  part  of  an 
irregular  plane  with  the  fore  part  of  the  boue. 

The  sustentaculum  is  thick  and  three-fourths  the  length  of  the  bone.  Tlie 
groove  beneath  for  the  flexor-tendons  is  well  marked.  Tlie  articular  surface 
it  supports  for  the  astragalus,  is  larger  than  that  on  the  body  of  the  bone. 
The  groove  separating  the  articular  surfaces  for  the  astragalus  nearly  occu- 
pies the  middle  of  the  bone  Both  surfaces  are  flat  in  front,  but  convex  back- 
ward behind 

No  articular  surface  exists  for  the  fibula.  At  the  fore  part  of  the  bone 
there  is  a  small  articular  facet  for  the  cuboid.  The  remaining  portion  of  the 
front  surface  forms  a  deep  and  wide  irregular  plane. 

The  astragalus,  of  which  upper  and  lower  views  are  given  half-size  in 
Figs.  7,  8,  Plate  XXVI,  resembles  that  of  the  ordinary  proboscideans.  The 
bone  is  irregularly  square,  with  nearly  equal  horizontal  diameters,  and  of  less 
thickness  than  these. 

The  ui)per  articular  face  has  nearly  the  shape  of  that  in  a  mastodon,  but 
is  rather  more  depressed  posteriorly.  The  fibular  extension  holds  about  the 
same  proportion  to  the  tibial  surface  as  in  the  animal  named. 

The  calcanean  articular  surfaces  are  the  reverse  in  their  comparative  size 
to  what  they  are  in  the  mastodon,  the  inner  one  being  the  larger.  Both  are 
also  more  concave  fore  and  aft  than  in  that  animal. 

The  navicular  articular  surface  is  proportionately  deeper  in  comparison  with 
its  width  tlian  in  mastodon,  and  is  well  defined  outwardly  from  the  cuboid 
articular  facet. 

The  cuboid  is  triangular  in  outline,  with  rouiraed  angles,  and  with  the 
thickness  more  than  iialf  the  breadth  or  depth.  Proximally  it  presents  a 
double  articular  facet,  of  which  the  division  for  the  astragalus  is  larger  than 
that  for  the  calcaneum.  The  former  division  is  continuous  with  a  narrow 
fiicet  on  the  inner  side  for  the  navicular.  Distally  the  l)onc  also  presents  a 
doulile  articular  tiicet,  the  divisions  forming  an  obtuse  angle. 

The  measurements  of  the  tarsal  bones  are  as  follows: 

Calcaneum, 

Lines. 

Length  of  calcaueum 413 

Breadth  at  fore  part 39 

Depth  at  fore  part  externally 31 

Length  of  tuber  c.ilcis  from  the  outer  articular  facet  above .  l-'O 

Breadth  transversely  of  the  outer  articular  facet  for  the  astragalus 14A 


e 


107 

Li  Ilea. 

Breadth  fore  ami  aft  of  the  outer  articuhir  facet  for  the  astragahis 'S3 

Breadth  trausverselj^  of  the  iuuer  articular  facet  for  the  astragalus . .  , 18 

Breadth  fore  and  aft  of  the  inner  articular  facet  for  the  astragalus 2i 

Breadth  transversely  of  the  articular  facet  for  the  cuboid 14 

Breadth  vertically  of  the  articular  facet  for  the  cuboid 10 

Astragalus. 

Lines. 

Greatest  breadth  fore  and  aft  of  the  astragalus  at  inner  side uO 

Greatest  breadth  transversely  of  the  astragalus 52 

Greatest  thickness  of  astragalus 32 

Breadtli  of  tibial  articular  surface  at  niidillo  transversely ' 38 

Breadth  of  tibial  articular  surface  at  middle  fore  and  aft 32 

Breadth  of  articular  facet  for  scaphoid 40 

Depth  of  articular  facet  for  scaphoid 28 

Cudoid. 

Linos. 

Depth  of  the  cuboid 25 

Breadth  of  the  cuboid  interiorly 25 

Length  of  the  cuboid  at  center 15 

The  canine  tooth,  originally  described  and  referred  to  a  carnivore  with  the 
name  of  Uintamastix  atrox,  is  represented  in  Figs.  1  to  3,  Plate  XXV.  T 
specimen  is  broken  into  two  pieces,  is  mutilated  at  the  point,  and  has  lost 
apparently  several  inches  of  the  base.  In  its  perfect  state  the  tooth  approxi- 
mated a  foot  in  length,  of  which  it  now  retains  about  three-fourths.  It  is  saber- 
like in  general  form — long,  laterally  compressed  cyliudroid,  and  moderately 
curved.  It  appears  more  curved  at  the  base,  and  from  this  position,  also,  has  a 
somewhat  outward  deflexion,  so  that  the  tooth  in  its  course  curved  forward  and 
downward  with  an  outward  divergence.  Laterally  from  the  base  it  gradually 
tapers  to  the  point ;  fore  and  aft  it  gradually  narrows  to  near  the  lower  third, 
when  it  becomes  slightly  expanded  before  tapering,  so  as  to  assume  the  shape 
of  a  lance-head.  This  likeness  is  rendered  more  striking  internally  by  the  sur- 
face being  concavely  impressed  in  front  and  behind  the  axis  extending  toward 
the  trenchant  borders  of  the  lance-head  extremity.  Externally,  it  is  impressed 
in  like  manner  to  a  less  extent  posteriorly,  but  not  anteriorly.  Above  the 
lance-head  extremity  of  the  tooth  it  is  obtusely  rounded  in  front  and  Ijehind, 
and  in  this  position  is  eUiptical  in  transverse  section,  as  represented  by  tlie 
(ludine,  Fiir.  5.  A  section  near  the  middle  of  the  lance-head  extremitv  has 
llie  form  represented  in  Fig.  4. 

The  tooth,  so  far  as  tlie  specimen  extends,  appears  to  have  been   invested 
willi   thin  enamel  throughout.      Externally,  if    reaches  lo  the  broken  edge  of 


108 

the  base,  and,  internally,  appears  to  liave  been  lost  from  the  corresponding 
position  l)y  erosion.  Externally,  it  is  longitudinally  rugose,  and  the  rugosity 
appears  to  be  greater  toward  tlie  point,  and,  to  some  extent,  is  divergent 
toward  the  trenchant  borders.  Internally,  the  rugosity  of  the  enamel  is  less 
marked,  and  toward  the  point  it  is  worn  off  for  several  inches  along  the  axis 
and  near  the  borders  from  the  attrition  of  an  opposing  lower  tooth.  The  ex- 
tent of  attrition  would  apparently  indicate  large  lower  canines. 

At  the  broken  base  of  the  specimen  the  borders  of  the  exposed  pulp  cavity 
are  nearly  4  lines  thick.  The  fore  and  aft  diameter  of  the  tooth  2  inches 
below  the  broken  base  is  a  little  under  2  inches ;  the  thickness  is  13  lines. 
The  breadth  of  the  tooth  just  Ijefore  expanding  in  the  lance-head  extremity 
is  1^  inches.  The  widest  part  of  the  latter  appears  to  have  been  a  couple  of 
lines  greater. 

The  tusk  above  described,  though  apparently  according  in  form  with  those 
of  Dinoceras  mirabiUs,  as  described  by  Professor  Marsh,  exhibits  different 
proportions,  having  less  breadth  and  greater  thickness.  Thus  Professor 
Marsh  gives  as  the  diameters  of  the  tusks  of  D.  mirahilis  64  millimeters 
breadth,  and  25  millimeters  thickness.  The  tusk  above  described  has  a 
breadth  of  50  miUimeters,  and  a  thickness  of  28  millimeters. 

From  the  description  of  the  skull  of  Dinoceras  given  by  Professor  Marsh, 
as  before  intimated,  I  have  been  led  to  view  the  large  tusks  above  described, 
and  originally  referred  to  a  carnivore  with  the  name  of  Uintamastix,  as  really 
pertaining  to  Uintatherium,  and  perhaps  to  the  same  species  as  that  indicated 
by  the  cranial  specimen  referred  to  TJ.  rohustum. 

The  molar  tooth  of  Uintatherium,  represented  in  Figs.  13,  14,  found  with 
the  large  tusk,  has  the  same  form  and  constitution  as  the  upper  molars  first 
referred  to  the  genus,  except  that  it  is  considerably  smaller,  and  has  no 
tubercle  behind  the  summit  of  the  conjunction  of  the  lobes  of  the  crown. 
Proportionately,  also,  the  basal  ridge  is  much  better  developed  at  the  inner 
part  of  the  crown,  where  it  is  continuous  with  the  stronger  ridge  in  front  and 
behind.  The  antero-posterior  diameter  of  this  tooth  is  11^  lines,  and  its 
transverse  diameter  is  estimated  at  13J  lines. 

The  tooth  I  supposed  to  be  an  upper  premolar  of  U.  rohustum;  if,  how- 
ever, it  is  a  true  molar,  its  comparatively  small  size,  and  the  absence  of  the 
characteristic  tubercle  on  the  posterior  slope  of  the  conjunction  of  the  lobes 
of  the  crown,  as  existing  in  the  species  just  named,  would  indicate  that  it 


109 

probably  belonged  to  a  diflereiit  one.     Found  in  association  with  the  canines 
referred  to  TJintamastix  atrox,  it  may  pertain  to  the  same  animal. 

Order  Rodentia. 

Small  qnadrupeds  with  clawed  toes.  Teeth  consisting  of  two  long  curved 
incisors  in  each  jaw ;  no  canines,  and  the  molars  separated  from  the  former 
by  a  wide  interval. 

Paeamys. 

An  interesting  peculiar  extinct  genus  of  gnawers  of  the  sciurine  family  is 
indicated  by  a  number  of  specimens,  consisting  of  fragments  of  lower  jaws 
with  teeth,  which  were  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter,  in  the  summer  of  1871,  in 
the  Tertiary  formation  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger. 

As  in  the  squirrels  and  marmots,  the  lower  molars  are  four  in  number, 
and  are  inserted  each  by  two  fangs.  They  are  nearly  of  the  same  size,  but 
are  proportionately  narrower  than  in  the  animals  just  mentioned,  as  the  fore 
and  aft  diameter  exceeds  the  transverse,  while  in  most  sciurine  animals  the 
reverse  condition  usually  exists. 

The  crowns  are  short,  square,  tuberculate,  and  enameled.  The  arrange- 
ments and  proportionate  size  of  the  tubercles  at  the  four  corners  of  the  crown, 
including  a  concave  surface,  are  the  same  as  in  the  squirrels. 

The  lower  jaw  is  proportionately  shorter  and  deeper  than  in  most  known 
rodents,  the  reduction  in  length  being  mainly  due  to  a  less  development  of 
that  part  of  the  bone  in  advance  of  the  molars.  To  compensate  for  the  dif- 
ference in  length  and  to  make  room  to  accommodate  the  incisors,  these  teeth 
reach  farther  back  than  usual.  In  squirrels  and  marmots  their  posterior 
extremity  reaches  a  short  distance  behind  and  beneath  the  last  molar.  In 
Paramys  it  reached  further  backward,  upward,  and  externally  to  a  level 
with  the  crown  of  the  last  molar. 

The  jaw  in  advance  of  the  molars  is  not  only  short  compared  with  the  usual 
condition  in  most  known  rodents,  but  the  acute  edge  of  the  hiatus  between 
the  molars  and  incisors  is  almost  on  a  level  with  the  alveoli  of  the  teeth, 
instead  of  forming  a  deep  concave  notch,  so  conspicuous  a  feature  in  the  lower 
jaw  of  the  gnawers  generally. 

In  sciurine  and  most  other  rodents  the  ridge  defining  the  masseteric  fossa 
extends  far  forward  on  the  side  of  the  jaw  to  a  position  beneath  the  second  or 


no 

even  the  first  molar  tooth.  In  the  rabl)U>;  tlic  defining  ridge  is  comparatively 
far  back,  extending  only  to  the  position  of  the  interval  of  the  last  two  molars. 
In  Paramys  it  holds  an  intermediate  position,  extending  as  far  forward  as  the 
position  of  the  third  molar,  where  it  forms  a  conspicuous  angular  prominence, 
as  in  the  marmots. 

The  mental  foramen,  much  higher  in  relative  position  than  usual  in  rodents, 
is  situated  in  advance  of  the  molars  a  short  distance  below  the  edge  of  the 
hiatus  separating  the  latter  from  the  incisor. 

Paramys  delicatus. 

The  largest  species  of  Paramys  was,  perhaps,  about  a  fourth  less  in  size 
than  the  Maryland  marmot,  though  its  series  of  molar  teeth  is  nearly  equal 
in  size,  measuring  three-fourths  of  an  inch  in  length.  It  is  represented  by 
two  specimens  sent  to  me  by  Dr.  Carter,  consisting  of  portions  of  the  right 
and  left  sides  of  the  lower  jaw,  containing  most  of  the  molars  and  portions  of 
the  incisors.  One  of  them  is  represented  in  Fig.  23,  Plate  VI,  of  the  natural 
size.  The  triturating  surfaces  of  the  molars  of  both  specimens,  magnified 
three  diameters,  are  represented  in  Figs.  24,  25. 

In  one  of  the  specimens.  Fig.  23,  two  mental  foramina  exist,  one  in  the 
position,  previously  indicated,  in  advance  of  the  molars,  a  short  distance 
below  the  edge  of  the  jaw ;  the  other  is  situated  lower  down  below  the  posi- 
tion of  the  first  molar.  In  the  other  specimen  the  foramen  exists  in  the  lat- 
ter position,  and  as  the  jaw  is  broken  in  advance,  it  cannot  be  determined 
whether  a  second  existed,  which  is,  however,  probable,  as  it  is  the  usual  and 
normal  position  of  one.  A  prominent  tubercle  is  il)rmed  at  the  angle  of  con- 
vergence of  the  ridges  which  define  the  masseteric  fossa. 

Paramys  delicatior. 

A  second  species  is  indicated  by  a  specimen  consisting  of  the  greater  por- 
tion of  the  left  ramus  of  a  lower  jaw,  represented  in  Fig.  26,  Plate  VI.  It 
retains  the  second  molar  tooth,  the  triturating  surface  of  which,  magnified 
three  diameters,  is  represented  in  Fig.  27  of  the  same  plate.  The  molar 
series  has  measured  about  74  lines  in  length,  and  (he  animal  was  about  the 
size  of  our  common  grav  rabbit. 

Since  writing  the  above,  I  have  x'eceived  from  Dr.  Carter  several  additional 
specimens  which  I  suspect  belong  to  the  same  species.  One  of  them,  an  in- 
termediate lower  molar,  is  represented  in  Fig.   16,  Plate  XXVII.     It  suflS- 


Ill 


cinifly   resembles  the  foolli  oi"  Fig.  27,  Plato  YI,  origiuiilly   reteried  lo    /'. 
delicatior,  to  pertain  tt)  tlu;  same  species,  thougli  it  is  slightly  larger. 

The  other  specimen,  apparently  from  the  same  individual,  consists  of  a  pair 
of  upper  molars  represented  in  Figs.  17,  1<S,  Plate  XXVII,  magnified  three 
diameters.  They  have  nearly  the  form  and  construction  of  those  of  the 
Sciurides. 

The  fore  and  aft  diameter  of  the  lower  molar  is  1.8  lines.  The  fore  and 
aft  diameter  of  the  upper  molars  is  1.8  lines,  and  the  transverse  diameter  is 
2  lines. 

Pakamys  delicatissimus. 

A  third  and  still  smaller  species  of  Paramys  is  indicated  liy  a  specimen 
consisting  of  the  greater  portion  of  the  right  ramus  of  a  lower  jaw  contain- 
ing all  the  molars,  and  a  second  specimen  consisting  of  a  small  fragment  of 
another  lower  jaw  containing  the  second  molar.  The  first  specimen  of  the 
natural  size  is  represented  in  Fig.  28,  Plate  VI.  A  view  of  the  triturating 
surfaces  of  the  molars,  magnified  three  diameters,  is  given  in  Fig.  29.  The 
molar  series  measures  J  an  inch  in  length,  and  the  animal  was  about  the  size 
of  the  common  gray  squirrel. 

Comparative  measurements  are  as  follows : 


Leugtb  of  louver  molar  series 

Leiigtb  of  biatus  iu  advance  of  lower  molar  series 

Deptb  of  jaw  below  tbe  second  molar 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  incisor 

Transverse  diameter  of  incisor 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  second  molar 

Transverse  diameter  of  second  molar 


P.  (lelica- 
tus. 


Lines. 
9 

C 

-1 
5 

14 


p.  delica- 
tior. 


Lines. 


14 


P.  delica- 
tissimiLs. 


Lines. 
G 

•1 

li 

H 
n 


MYSOPS. 

Mysops  minimus. 

A  small  rodent,  intermediate  in  size  to  the  common  mouse  and  the  brown 
rat,  is  indicated  by  a  specimen  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  at  Grizzly  Buttes 
and  sent  to  the  author  last  summer.  The  S])ccim('n  cousists  of  the  median 
portion  of  the  right  ramus  of  a  lower  jaw  containing  the  last  two  molars,  the 


112 

fangs  of  the  others,  and  part  of  the  incisor.     It  is  represented  in  Fig.  31, 
Plate  VI,  magnified  two  diameters. 

The  jaw  in  its  form,  proportions,  and  construction,  and  the  number  of  teeth 
and  their  relative  position,  agree  with  the  conditions  in  Paramys,  but  the  form 
of  the  molars  is  sufficiently  different  to  refer  the  specimen  to  a  different  genus, 
for  which  the  above  name  has  been  proposed. 

The  molar  teeth,  as  in  Paramys,  are  four  in  number,  inserted  each  by 
a  pair  of  fangs.  The  crowns  are  quadrate  and  invested  with  enamel. 
The  triturating  surface,  instead  of  being  constructed  like  tluit  of  the  squir- 
rels, is  more  like  that  of  the  rats,  as  seen  in  Fig.  32,  Plate  VI,  in  which 
tiic  last  two  molars  of  the  specimen  are  represented  magnified  eight  diam- 
eters. The  crown  of  the  third  molar  exhibits  two  transverse  lobes,  or 
ridges,  joined  by  an  intermediate  narrow  ridge,  and  the  inner  extremities  of 
the  lobes  include  a  trilateral  tubercle.  The  enamel  being  worn  away  from 
the  prominences  of  the  crown  leave  exposed  a  pair  of  transversely  eUipsoidul 
dentinal  surfiices  joined  by  a  narrow  isthmus.  Upon  the  summit  of  the  inter- 
nal tubercle  a  small  islet  of  dentine  also  appears. 

The  last  molar  exhibits  three  transverse  ridges  or  lobes,  of  which  the 
anterior  is  the  thickest,  the  middle  one  the  thinnest,  and  the  .i^osterior  the 
shortest.  The  anterior  lobe  is  worn  so  as  to  exhibit  a  transversely  elliptical 
surface  of  dentine  bordered  with  enamel.  The  middle  ridge  of  the  crown 
appears  sigmoid  and  is  unworn.  The  posterior  lobe  presents  an  exposed  islet 
of  dentine  on  the  inner  half  of  its  length. 

The  anterior  molar  of  Mysops,  like  the  last  one,  is  more  elongate  fore  and 
aft  than  the  tw-o  succeeding  molars,  but  it  is  proportionately  of  less  size  than 
in  the  rats,  and  has  not  three  fangs  as  in  these  animals. 

The  length  of  the  molar  series  is  J  of  an  inch.  The  first  and  fourtli 
molars  are  about  |  of  a  line  fore  and  afl ;  the  intermediate  ones  about  ^.  The 
incisor  measures  about  I  of  a  line  fore  and  aft  l)y  f  transversely.  The  depth 
of  the  lower  jaw  below  the  second  molar  is  2^  lines.  The  length  of  the 
hiatus  in  advance  of  the  molars  is  1^  lines. 

Mysops  fraternus. 

Since  writing  the  foregoing  I  have  received  another  specimen,  which  may 
belong  to  Mysops.  It  was  found  by  a  Shoshone  Indian,  and  given  to  Dr. 
Carter.     It  consists  of  a  portion  of  the  right  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw,  repre- 


113 

scntrd  iu  Fig.  14,  Plate  XXVIl.  It  coiit;iiiis  the  last  three  molai-s,  tlic  trilii- 
rating  surtiices  of  which  are  represented  in  Fig.  15,  magnified  eight  dianieters. 

I'he  jaw  is  proportioiaately  deep  and  short,  compared  with  that  of  Ihe  ra1. 
The  masseteric  fossa  is  deep,  and  defined  by  a  rectangle,  the  apex  of  wiiioh 
reaches  as  far  forward  as  the  position  of  the  third  molar  tooth.  The  l)ordei- 
of  the  jaw  at  the  hiatus  in  advance  of  the  molars  extends  nearly  on  a  level 
from  their  alveoli  to  that  of  the  incisor. 

The  molar  teeth,  though  having  the  same  general  constitution  as  the  cor- 
responding ones  in  the  jaw-fragment  of  Mysops  mini»ms,  above  described, 
appear  sufficiently  distinct  to  pertain  to  another  species,  and  I  have  therefore 
distinguished  it  as  such  with  the  name  of  J/,  fraternus. 

In  the  jaw-specimens  of  both  species  the  molars  are  worn  nearly  to  the 
same  extent.  In  comparing  the  corresponding  teeth,  it  will  be  seen  that  the 
third  molar  in  M.  fraternus  has  a  greater  breadth  fore  and  aft,  and  the  last 
molar  is  of  more  uniform  width  transversely.  In  both  teeth  the  intermediate 
conical  lobe,  occupying  the  inner  part  of  the  crown,  is  proportionately  more 
robust  in  M.  frateimus. 

The  depth  of  the  jaw  below  the  third  molar  is  2.6  lines;  the  breadth  ol' 
each  of  the  three  back  molars  fore  and  aft  is  about  eight-tenths  of  a  line;  the 
space  occupied  by  the  four  molars  is  a  little  over  3  lines. 

SCIURAVUS. 

In  the  American  Journal  of  Science  for  July,  1871,  Professor  ]\Iarsh  has 
described  an  extinct  genus  of  rodents  from  remains  found  at  Grizzly  Buttes, 
under  the  aboTe  name,  and  refers  them  to  two  species  with  the  names  of 
Sciuravus  nitidus  and  8.  undans.  The  former,  described  from  an  upper-jaw 
fragment  with  three  molars,  was  about  the  size  of  the  brown  rat.  The  latter, 
indicated  by  a  lower-jaw  fragment  with  the  incisors  and  the  anterior  three 
molars,  was  a  somewhat  larger  animal. 

While  we  have  not  the  means  of  determinmg  whether  Paramys  is  abso- 
lutely distinct  from  Sciuravus,  we  have  the  opportunity  of  examining  a  speci- 
men belonging  to  a  different  genus  from  the  former,  and  which  we  suspect 
pertains  to  the  latter.  The  specimen  in  question  consists  of  a  fragment  of  the 
left  side  of  the  lower  jaw,  containing  the  third  molar,  the  alveolus  behind,  and 
part  of  that  in  front.  It  belonged  to  an  animal  but  little  larger  than  the  rat. 
The  fossil  was  found  at  Grizzly  Buttes  by  Dr.  Carter.  The  only  remaining 
15   G 


114 

tooth  it  contains  is  represented  in  Fig.  30,  Plate  VI,  magniticd  eiglit  diam- 
eters. 

The  tootli  is  al)oiit  a  line  in  breadth,  and,  together  with  the  alveolns  back 
of  it,  occupies  a  space  of  2^  lines.  The  crown  of  the  tooth  is  quadrate, 
broader  than  wide,  and  is  composed  of  tour  principal  conical  lobes,  as  in  the 
squirrels,  and  as  in  its  associate  Paramys  The  sculpture  and  connection  of 
the  lobes  is  difTerent,  as  may  be  conveniently  observed  by  comparing  Fig.  30 
with  Fig.  27,  representing  a  tooth  of  the  same  side  of  Paramys.  It  is  espe- 
cially to  be  noticed  that  in  the  latter  the  back  pair  of  lobes  include,  between 
them  and  the  anterior  lobes,  a  broad  hollow,  and  the  former  are  connected 
behind  by  an  acute  ridge,  which  forms  the  posterior  border  of  the  crown. 
The  broad  hollow  of  the  latter  is  closed  externally  l:)y  a  festoon-like  ridge 
connecting  the  outer  lobes  at  their  base. 

In  the  supposed  tooth  of  Sciuravus  (Fig.  30)  the  broad  hollow  of  the  crown 
so  conspicuous  in  Paramys  and  Sciurus  is  not  evident.  The  posterior  lobes 
are  conjoined  by  a  transverse  ridge,  and  are  bounded  behind  by  a  thick  ridge 
descending  inwardly  from  the  postero-external  lobe.  The  transverse  valley 
of  the  crown  is  occupied  by  a  pair  of  ridges  diverging  from  the  postero- 
external lobe  to  those  in  advance. 

Order   Carnivora. 

PATRIOFELIS. 

Pateiofelis  ulta. 

A  carnivorous  animal,  rather  larger  than  our  common  American  panther, 
and  about  the  size  of  the  jaguar,  to  wliicli  the  above  name  has  been  given,  is 
indicated  by  remains  in  the  Bridgcr  Tertiary  formation.  The  sijecimens 
from  which  it  was  originally  described  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy 
of  Natural  Sciences  for  March,  1870,  were  obtained  near  Fort  Bridger, 
Wyoming,  during  Professor  Hayden's  exploration  of  1869.  They  consist  of 
portions  of  both  rami  of  a  lower  jaw,  unfortunately  with  most  of  the  teeth 
lost  or  mutilated.  The  right  ramus  is  represented,  one-half  the  natural  size, 
in  Fig.  10,  Plate  II. 

The  jaw  of  Patriofelis  contains  a  series  of  five  molar  teeth  immediately 
succeeding  the  canine  tooth  without  conspicuous  interval,  as  in  some  of  the 
viverrine  and  musteline  animals.  The  molar  teeth  arc  all  inserted  Ijy  a  pair 
of  fangs,  and  none  of  them  appear  to  be  of  the  jmrely  tubercular  kind.     The 


115 

first  of"  the  series  is  smallest,  and  the  third  the  largest ;  the  i()urtli  was  inter- 
mediate ill  size  to  the  latter  and  the  last  one,  which  little  exceeded  tlie 
second. 

The  crown  of  the  last  molar  in  the  specimen  appears  as  if  it  had  been 
composed  of  an  anterior  pointed,  or  perhaps  trenchant,  lobe,  and  a  large  pos- 
terior heel. 

The  crown  of  the  penultimate  molar  appears  to  have  been  nearly  of  the 
same  character.  In  the  crown  of  the  antepenultimate  molar  the  posterior 
heel  forms  a  median  acute  ridge  from  which  the  sides  slope  toward  the 
bottom.  The  outer  slope,  nearly  twice  the  depth  of  the  inner,  is  bounded 
behind  by  a  ridge  descending  from  the  summit  of  the  heel.  The  inner  slope 
is  bordered  by  a  basal  ridge  curving  downward  and  forward  from  the  summit. 

The  canines,  as  indicated  by  portions  of  the  alveoli,  are  large  and  powerful 
teeth,  as  in  feline  animals.     The  alveoli  are  about  ^  i'lch  in  diameter. 

The  jaw  has  nearly  the  same  form  as  in  the  panther,  but  is  proportionately 
shorter,  and  beneath  the  molar  teeth  of  greater  depth,  in  this  respect  resem- 
bling more  the  condition  in  the  striped  hyena.  The  condyle  has  the  same 
form  and  relative  position  as  in  ordinary  carnivora,  but  is  thicker  or  of  greater 
extent  on  its  articular  surface  fore  and  afl  than  in  the  panther.  Its  compara- 
tive breadth  is  undeterminate,  from  its  being  broken  at  both  ends  in  the 
specimen. 

The  back  portion  of  the  jaw  is  proportionately  narrower  than  in  the 
panther;  and  the  coronoid  process,  which  appears  to  have  had  the  same 
f(jrm  as  in  this,  is  likewise  narrower.  The  masseteric  fossa  is  not  so  deep  as 
ill  ordinary  carnivora.  Extending  from  the  coronoid  downward,  a  little 
below  the  level  of  the  condyle,  it  becomes,  rather  abruptly  shallower,  and 
from  this  position  gradually  lessens  in  depth  toward  the  base,  from  which  it 
is  not  abruptly  defined  by  a  narrow  ridge,  as  in  the  ordinary  carnivora. 

The  symphysis  is  strong,  and  the  rami  approaching  it  thick,  as  in  the 
pantlier.  A  group  of  seven  mental  foramina  occupy  a  position  at  the  side 
of  the  symphysis.  The  largest  of  them,  as  in  the  panther,  is  situated  outside 
the  back  part  of  the  canine  alveolus. 

From  the  absence  of  the  chai'acteristic  portions  of  the  teeth,  the  exact 
relationship  of  Patriofelis  is  not  clear.  It  is  perhaps  intermediate  to  the 
feline  and  canine  animals. 


116 
Measurements  from  the  lower  jaw  of  Patriofelis  uUa  are  as  follows  : 

Inches.  Lines. 

Estimatetl  length  of  jaw 6  0 

Distance  from  back  of  condyle  to  canine  alveolus 5  4 

Distance  from  back  of  condyle  to  back  of  last  molar 2  3 

Space  occupied  by  the  molar  series .3  0 

Breadth  of  coronoid  at  base 1  7 

Depth  of  jaw  below  penultimate  molar -. 1  -i 

Depth  of  jaw  below  back  of  last  molar 1  6 

Measurements  of  the  molar  teeth,  estimated  from  their  fangs  and  alveoli, 
are  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Breadth  of  first  molar  tooth 5 

Breadth  of  second  molar  tooth , 7 

Breadth  of  third  molar  tooth 8J 

Breadth  of  fourth  molar  tooth 7 

Breadtli  of  tifth  molar  tooth 8 

Fig.  20,  Plate  VII,  represents  a  tooth  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  near  Fort 
Bridger.  It  appears  not  to  belong  to  the  lower  jaw  of  Patriofelis,  but  pci'- 
haps  belongs  to  the  upi)er  jaw.  The  crown  is  composed  of  a  large  conical 
lobe  with  a  broad  heel,  the  sides  of"  which  slope  from  a  median  ridge.  The 
breadth  of  the  crown  is  8^  lines  ;  its  thickness  5  lines. 

SINOPA. 

SiNOPA    EAPAX. 

A  lower-jaw  fragment,  containing  two  teeth  and  portions  of  two  others, 
represented  in  Fig.  44,  Plate  VI,  appears  to  indicate  an  extinct  genus  related 
to  the  canine  family.  The  specimen  was  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  in  the 
vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger,  and  was  by  him  presented  to  the  writer.  It  belonged 
to  an  animal  about  the  size  of  the  gray  fox. 

The  specimen  is  insufficient  to  ascertain  with  any  certainty  the  exact  rela- 
tionship of  the  animal  to  which  it  belonged,  but  the  character  of  the  teeth 
leads  me  to  view  it  as  having  held  an  intermediate  position  to  the  existing 
genus  Canis  and  the  extinct  one  Hysenodon. 

Tlie  teeth  preserved  entire  in  the  specimen  appear  to  correspond  with  the 
last  premolar  and  the  first  or  sectorial  molar  of  the  fox,  and  the  remains  of 
two  teeth  behind  would  be  of  the  second  and  third  molars.  The  last  pre- 
molar is  larger  than  the  molars.  Its  crown  is  as  wide,  but  is  longer  than  that 
of  the  tooth  retained  behind  it.     The  form  of  the  crown  is  more  like  that  in 


117 

Hyaenodoii  (iiaii  in  th(3  fox.  It  is  prnportioiiafcly  longer  and  narrower  than 
in  the  latter,  and  the  accessory  cnsp  at  llic  back  border  of  the  principal  oiie 
in  the  tijx  is  nearly  obsolete  in  the  fossil.  The  heel  of  the  cro.wn  is  l)etler 
developed  than  in  the  fox.  It  forms  a  median  acntc  ridge,  and  slopes  off  on 
each  side  to  the  rounded  base  of  the  crown. 

The  first  molar,  as  liefore  intimated,  is  smaller  than  the  last  premolar.  It 
is  as  wide  as  the  second  molar,  but  not  so  thick,  and  is  slightly  wider  than 
the  last  molar.  It  is  proportionately  better  developed  in  its  relation  with  the 
succeeding  molars  than  in  Hyasnodon.  Its  crown  is  intermediate  in  form 
and  in  the  development  of  its  parts  to  that  in  the  fox  on  the  one  hand  and  the 
raccoon  and  badger  on  the  other.  The  fore  i)art  of  the  crown,  consisting  of 
rather  more  than  one-half,  corresponds  withthe  sectorial  ])orti()n  of  the  same 
tooth  in  the  fox,  but  accords  more  in  shape  and  the  relative  position  and  de- 
velopment of  its  points  with  the  homologous  portion  in  the  raccoon  and  bad- 
ger. The  heel  of  the  crown  is  bordered  by  a  horseshoe-shaped  ridge  inclos- 
ing a  cup-like  concavity. 

The  heel  of  the  second  molar,  the  only  portion  of  the  crown  retained  in 
the  specimen,  is  stouter  than  in  the  first  molar,  liut  has  the  same  shape.  The 
width  of  the  crown  is  about  equal  to  that  of  the  tooth  in  advance,  but  has 
been  slightly  thicker. 

The  last  molar  is  a  two-fanged  tooth  like  those  in  advance,  but  is  not  quite 
so  wide,  and  a  small  portion  of  the  back  of  the  crown  indicates  it  to  have 
been  of  less  thickness. 

The  base  of  the  jaw-fragment  is  broken  away  in  the  spcchnen.  The  por- 
tion preserved  presents  nothing  peculiar. 

Measurements  of  the  fossil  are  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Space  occupied  bj-  the  last  premolar  and  molars 15 

Space  occupied  by  the  molars 11 

Breadth  of  crowu  of  last  premolar 4 

Length  of  crown  of  last  premolar  at  middle 3J 

Breadth  of  crown  of  first  molar 4 

Length  of  crown  of  first  molar  at  principal  cusp 2i| 

Thickness  of  crown  of  first  molar  at  heel 2 

Breadth  of  crowu  of  second  molar 4 

Tliickuess  of  crown  of  second  molar  at  heel 2^ 

Breadth  of  crown  of  last  molar i!  J 

The  name  Sinopa,  applied  to  the  extinct  genus,  according  to  Professor 
Ilayden,  is  aboriginal,  and  is  applied  by  the  Blackfeet  Indians  to  a  small  fo.x 


118 

While  the  original  notice  of  Sinopa  rapax  was  in  print,  in  the  Proceedings 
of  Ihe  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia,  Professor  Marsh  pul)- 
lished  a  description,  in  the  American  Journal  of  Science  for  1871,  of  some 
remains  of  a  carnivore  from  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger,  under  the  name  of 
Vulpavus  palustris.  It  is  characterized  from  several  upper  molars  which  accord 
in  size  sufficiently  to  pertain  to  the  same  animal  as  that  above  described. 
Further  researches  may  prove  the  two  animals  to  be  the  same. 

Sinopa  eximia. 

A  jaw-fragment,  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  at  Grizzly  Buttes,  and  repre- 
sented in  Fig.  45,  Plate  VI,  belongs  to  a  smaller  carnivore  than  the  preced- 
ing. It  was  probably  allied  to  the  former,  and  may  perhaps  pertain  to  a 
smaller  species  of  the  same  genus,  of  which  I  have  some  doul)t,  though,  in 
the  absence  of  more  confirmatory  evidence,  I  have  considered  it  as  such. 

The  specimen  contains  two  teeth,  which  sufficiently  resemble  those  re- 
tained in  the  jaw-fragment  referred  to  Sinopa  rapax,  as  to  render  it  probable 
they  are  the  corresponding  ones,  though  the  contiguity  of  the  symphysis  leads 
me  to  suspect  that  they  may  be  the  last  two  premolars.  As  seen  in  the 
figure,  the  back  of  the  symphysis  is  just  below  the  position  in  advance  of 
the  first  tooth  of  the  specimen.  The  teeth  in  shape  are  nearly  like  those  in 
Sinopa  rapax,  but  the  proportions  are  reversed.  The  crowns  of  the  two 
teeth  have  the  same  length,  but  the  hinder  one  is  wider  and  thicker. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Depth  of  the  jaw  below  the  teeth 4| 

Space  occupied  by  the  two  teeth 4J 

Width  of  the  crown  of  the  first  tooth 2 

Length  of  the  crown  of  the  first  tooth 2:^ 

Width  of  the  crown  of  the  second  tooth 2J 

Length  of  the  crown  of  the  second  tooth 2^ 

UINTACYON. 

UlNTACYON    EDAX. 

An  interesting  fossil,  recently  received  from  Dr.  Carter  and  discovered  by 
him  in  the  Bridger  beds,  consists  of  the  greater  portion  of  the  right  ramus  of 
a  lower  jaw,  represented  in  Fig.  6,  Plate  XXVII.  The  specimen  indicates 
a  carnivorous  animal,  probably  marsupial,  and  of  a  hillierto  unknown  genns, 
for  which  the  above  name  has  been  proposed. 


119 

The  jaw  contained  a  series  of  eight  inohir  teeth  and  a  canine  separaled 
I'rom  the  former  by  a  small  hiatus.  Of  the  molar  teeth,  the  specimen  retains 
))art  of  the  first  molar  and  the  succeeding  molar,  represented  in  Figs.  7,  H, 
and  the  intermediate  three  premolars  represented  in  Figs.  9,  10. 

The  jaw-fragment  agrees  in  its  form  and  proportions  with  the  correspond- 
ing part  in  the  existing  fox.  The  teeth  also,  so  far  as  they  are  preserved,  are 
nearly  like  those  of  the  latter  animal. 

The  canine  tooth  was  equally  well  developed  as  in  the  latter,  and  the  first 
premolar  is  inserted  by  a  single  fang.  The  second  premolar  likewise  resem- 
bles the  corresponding  tooth  of  the  fox. 

The  third  premolar  is  peculiar,  and  perhaps  anomalous.  It  resembles  niore 
the  form  of  an  upper  pi'emolar  than  the  nsual  form  of  lower  premolars.  It 
has  three  fangs,  of  which  two  are  inserted  in  a  line  with  those  of  the  con- 
tiguous teeth,  while  the  third  fimg  is  external.  The  crown  is  a  four-sided 
pyramid  with  projecting  basal  angles,  of  which  the  postero-internal  one  is  the 
most  prominent. 

The  fourth  premolar  is  like  the  last  one  of  the  fox,  Ijut  is  proportionately 
thicker.  The  fifth  premolar  is  lost,  and,  like  the  preceding  tooth,  was  inserted 
Ijy  a  pair  of  fangs. 

The  first  molar  has  lost  the  fore  part  of  its  crown,  and  this  appears  not  to 
have  been  proportionately  so  well  developed  as  in  the  fox.  The  crown  of 
the  second  molar  is  nearly  of  the  same  form  as  in  the  latter. 

The  last  molar  is  a  small  tooth,  as  in  the  fox,  and  is  also  inserted  by  a  single 
fang. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Depth  of  lower  jaw  at  second  premolar 4. 8 

Depth  of  lower  jaw  at  first  molar 4.  .S 

Distance  from  fore  part  of  caniue  to  back  of  last  molar IS.  0 

Length  of  the  molar  series 14.  8 

Length  of  the  premolar  series  8.  8 

Length  of  the  true  molar  series (J.  0 

Breadth  of  second  premolar 1-7 

Breadth  of  third  premolar 1-5 

Breadth  of  the  fourth  premolar 1-  *• 

Breadth  of  the  fifth  premolar ^-4 

Breadth  of  the  first  molar >5.  ^ 

Breadth  of  .second  molar ^- " 

Breadth  of  third  molar t  •  " 

The  main  peculiarity  of  tlie  fossil  is  the  presence  of  an  eighth  tooth  to  the 


120 

molar  series.  The  one  in  excess  ul'  the  usual  nunil)er,  witliuiit  other  considera- 
tion tlian  convenience,  I  have  viewed  as  a  premolar.  From  its  anomalous,  or  at 
least  unusual,  torni,  the  tburth  of  the  series  of  the  premolars  may  l»e  regarded 
as  the  additional  tooth.  Without  it,  the  jaw  would  indicate  a  small  canine 
animal,  or  at  least  a  species  of  a  closely  allied  genus.  The  animal  was  al)out 
half  the  size  of  the  common  fox. 

UlNTACYON   VORAX. 

Perhaps  a  larger  .species  of  the  genus  just  named  is  indicated  by  the  jaw- 
fragment  represented  in  Fig.  11,  Plate  XXVII.  The  specimen  was  obtained 
on  Henry's  Fork  of  Green  River,  during  Professor  Hayden's  expedition  of 
1870. 

The  jaw-fragment  agrees  in  form  with  the  corresponding  part  of  the  jaw- 
specimen  of  U.  edax,  but  from  its  proportions  belonged  to  an  animal  twice  the 
size.  It  contains  the  penultimate  molar,  the  heel  of  the  one  in  advance,  and 
the  alveolus  of  the  last  molar.  The  teeth  agree  in  their  proportions  witli 
those  of  U.  eda.r,  and  the  penultimate  molar,  represented  in  Figs.  12,  13, 
sufficiently  resembles  that  of  the  latter  to  belong  to  the  same  genus.  The 
l>ri-atllh  of  the  penultimate  molar  is  2|-  lines. 

Order  Tnsecfirora. 

OMOMYS. 

Omomys  Caeteri. 

The  first  mammalian  fossil  described  from  the  Bridger  Tertiary  beds  con- 
sists of  the  fragment  of  a  lower  jaw  with  teeth,  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  on 
Twin  Butte,  about  one  mile  from  Fort  Bridger.  The  specimen  is  repre- 
sented in  Figs.  13,  14,  Plate  XXIX,  of  ''The  Extinct  Mammalian  P'auna 
of  Dakota  and  Nebraska,"  published  as  the  seventh  volume  of  the  Journal  of 
the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia  tor  18G9,  and  is  described 
on  page  408  of  that  work. 

The  jaw-specimen  was  accompanied  with  tVagments  of  the  cranium,  for  the 
most  part  too  much  broken  to  determine  anything  from  them.  They  would 
appear  to  indicate  a  skull  about  the  size  of  that  of  the  common  weasel,  but 
with  weaker  jaws. 

A  fragment  of  the  cranium  retains  a  straight  linear  sagittal  crest  al)out  14 


121 

lines  in   lenglli  to  its   l)il'iircatioii  at    \\\r    lorcliead.      'riic   loinpural   siirfacps 
appear  to  be  full  and  convex,  as  in  the  weasel. 

An  occipital  condyle  resembles  those  of  the  latter,  and  measures  about  1 
lines  in  its  longer  diameter. 

The  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw,  compared  with  that  of  the  weasel,  is  more 
slender  and  delicate  in  its  proportions.  In  the  specimen  both  extremities 
are  broken,  but  a  portion  of  the  sym])hysis  is  still  retained. 

The  jaw  below  the  molars  is  of  nearly  uniform  depth,  and  measures  about 
2  lines.  The  base  is  slightly  convex  fore  and  aft,  but  makes  a  concave  turn 
toward  the  angle.  The  masseteric  fossa  below  is  well  marked.  A  small 
mental  foramen  occupies  a  position  below  the  antepenultimate  premolar. 

In  the  earlier  description  of  the  specimen,  I  remarked  that  seven  molar 
teeth,  in  an  unbroken  series,  appear  to  have  occupied  the  side  of  the  jaw.  In 
the  actual  condition  of  the  fossil  there  are  four  teeth,  consisting  of  the  anterior 
two  molars  and  the  two  premolars  in  advance.  In  front  of  these  there  are 
two  empty  sockets  and  parts  of  two  others,  and  behind  them  there  are  the 
imperfect  alveoli  for  a  third  molar.  The  sockets  at  the  front  of  the  jaw  I  at 
first  supposed  were  intended  for  two  additional  two-fanged  premolars.  They 
fill  up  the  interval  between  the  retained  teeth  and  the  edge  of  the  symphysis 
so  closely  that,  from  this  fact  and  their  relative  size,  I  now  suspect  that  they 
may  have  been  occupied  by  a  single-fanged  premolar,  a  small  canine,  and 
two  incisors.  Assuming  that  such  was  the  case,  without  any  certainty  in  the 
matter,  the  number  of  molar  teeth  in  the  series  would  be  six,  of  which  three 
were  premolars  and  three  true  molars.  In  this  view  the  teeth  retained  in 
the  specimen  consist  of  the  second  and  third  premolars  and  the  first  and  sec- 
ond molars.  Their  constitution  would  appear  to  indicate  an  insectivorous 
animal  which,  jjerhaps,  was  marsupial  in  character. 

The  teeth  successively  decrease  in  i)rominence  or  height  from  the  second 
premolar  to  the  second  molar.  They  resemble  in  constitution  the  corre- 
sponding teeth  of  the  opossum. 

The  crown  of  the  premolars  is  laterally  compressed  conical,  thicker  behind 
than  in  front,  and  is  embraced  by  a  basal  ridge.  The  crown  of  the  second 
premolar,  more  prominent  than  in  any  of  the  other  teeth,  is  triangular,  longer 
than  broad,  and  sharp-pointed.  Its  anterior  slope  is  slightly  convex  and  acute; 
its  posterior  slope  is  longer,  slightly  concave,  and  wide.  The  basal  ridge 
ibrms  an  excavated  heel  behind,  a  more  elevated  ledge  in  front,  and  a  jiair  of 
IG   G 


122 

t'estooiiR  both  intcrnall}'  and  extemall\'.  The  inner  side  of  the  crown  is 
defined  from  the  back  border  by  an  acute  ridge. 

The  crown  of  the  last;  premolar  has  the  same  constructioii  as  that  in  advance, 
but  is  sliorter  and  wider.  The  heel  is  slightly  wider  and  more  excavated,  but 
the  fore  part  of  the  basal  ridge  is  not  so  prominent.  The  ridge  defining  the 
inner  side  from  the  posterior  border  is  slightly  more  advanced  and  prominent, 
and  the  surfaces  it  separates  are  more  concave. 

The  crowns  of  the  true  molars  are  nearly  alike  in  form  and  size,  though 
the  first  is  in  a  trifling  degree  more  prominent  and  wider.  They  have  the 
same  general  constitution  as  those  of  shrews,  of  the  hedgehog,  the  galeopi- 
thecus,  and  the  opossum.  Eacli  is  composed  of  two  divisions,  of  which  the 
posterior  is  the  larger.  The  anterior  division  consists  of  a  small,  outer  demi- 
conoidal  lobe,  with  aV-like  summit  joining  by  its  arms  a  pair  of  inner  and  smaller 
pyramidal  lobes.  The  posterior  division  consists  of  an  outer  lol)e  like  that  in 
advance,  but  larger,  and  joining  it  by  one  of  the  arms  of  its  V-like  summit, 
while  the  other  arm  joins  a  small  pyramidal  lobe  at  the  inner  corner  of  the 
crown.  The  outer  part  of  the  base  of  the  crown  is  embraced  by  a  basal  cin- 
gulnm  nearly  half  its  depth. 

The  space  occupied  1))^  the  teeth,  in  the  view  that  there  were  two  incisors, 
a  canine,  and  six  molars,  is  74-  lines.  The  last  two  premolars  and  the  suc- 
ceeding two  molars  occupy  a  space  of  4.6  lines. 

PALiEACODON. 

Pal^acodon  veeus. 

Two  small  fossil  specimens,  discovered  the  previous,  summer  by  Dr.  Carter 
at  Lodge-Pole  Trail,  Wyoming,  indicate  an  insectivorous  animal,  or,  perhaps, 
a  marsupial  allied  to  the  opossum.  One  of  the  specimens  consists  of  an 
nppcr-jaw  fragment  containing  a  molar,  which  appears  to  be  the  penultimate 
one  of  the  series;  the  other  is  an  isolated  tooth,  perhaps  the  last  upper  pre- 
molar or  first  molar. 

The  jaw-fragment  is  the  portion  which  forms  the  anterior  abutment  of  the 
zygoma.  In  advance  of  the  tooth  it  retains  are  the  remains  of  the  alveoli  of 
two  others,  and  behind  it  the  remains  of  another. 

Tlie  molar  of  the  jaw-fragment  is  represented  in  Fig.  46,  Plate  VI,  magni- 
fied four  diameters.  The  crown  bears  some  resemblance  with  that  of  the 
molars  of  tiic  opossum,  ])ut  is  less  narrowed  internally,  and  is  therefore  more 


123 

(iu;iilr;iie  or  le.s.s  triangular  in  tbrin.  Tlie  conslitiiiiou  is  similar,  but,  Uk^  oiilnr 
lobes  are  proportionately  better  developed  and  the  median  ones  are  mticli 
lediiced  in  size.  A  basal  ridge  nearly  embraces  the  crown,  ])ut  is  nearly 
obsolete  internally,  and  is  best  developed  posteriorly,  where  it  forms  a  wide 
festoon. 

The  isolated  tooth  is  a  diminished  representative  of  the  one  in  the  jaw- 
fragment,  and  probably  held  the  position  of  the  third  in  advance  of  it.  It 
may,  perhaps,  represent  a  smaller  species.  The  specimens  indicate  an  animal 
l)ut  little  more  than  half  the  size  of  the  ©possum.  How  it  is  related  with 
Omomys  the  paucity  of  material  prevents  a  positive  determination.  The  size 
of  the  teeth  indicates  a  larger  animal  than  Omomys  Carteri. 

In  the  American  Journal  of  Science  for  1871,  Professor  Marsh  has 
described  a  tooth,  from  Grizzly  Buttes,  which  he  likens  to  the  premolars  of 
some  insectivora,  and  refers  it  to  a  species  with  the  name  of  Triacodon  fallax. 

He  remarks  that  the  species  was  probably  about  two-thirds  of  the  size  of 
the  opossum,  which  dimensions  would  be  too  great  for  the  animal  we  have 
named  Palceacoclon  verus. 

The  sizes  of  the  teeth  referred  to  the  latter  are  as  follows: 

Lines. 

Space  occupied  by  tlie  penultimate  and  antepenultimate  molars 4 

Breadth  of  penultimate  molar 2 

Width  of  penultimate  molar 2^ 

Breadth  of  last  premolar li 

Width  of  last  premolar  1  ^ 

WASHAKIUS. 

Washakius  insignis. 

A  jaw-fragment  of  a  small  animal  recently  sent  to  me  by  Dr.  Carter  is  rep- 
resented in  Fig.  3,  Plate  XXVII,  magnified  three  diameters.  The  specimen 
was  found  in  the  Bridger  beds  by  a  Shoshone  Indian  and  given  to  Dr.  Carter. 
It  is  quite  different  in  appearance  from  any  similar  fossil  from  the  same  for- 
mation submitted  to  my  inspection,  and  appears  to  indicate  a  different  genus 
from  those  described  in  the  preceding  pages.  I  am  uncertain  as  to  its  ordi- 
nal affinities,  but  suspect  it  to  have  pertained  to  an  insectivorous  animal,  per- 
haps one  of  the  many  which  have  been  indicated  by  Professor  Marsh  from  tbssils 
of  the  Bridger  beds. 

The  jaw-fragment  contains  the  last  two  molars,  the  triturating  surfiices  of 


124 

which,  considerably  worn,  are  represented  in  Fig.  4,  Plate  XXVIT,  magnitied 
eight  diameters. 

The  portion  of  jaw  is  of  moderate  depth  and  stont  in  proportion.  The 
base  is  thick  and  rounded.  The  masseteric  depression  is  well  marked,  and  is 
defined  at  its  lower  part  in  front  by  a  strong  ridge  descending  from  the  fore 
part  of  the  coronoid  process  and  ending  in  a  conspicnous  angular  tubercle. 

The  {eeth  resemble  most  nearly  tliose  of  Microsyops.  They  are  inserted 
with  a  pair  of  flings;  but  in  the  last  molar  the  posterior  fang  is  a  connate  pair 
extended  backward. 

The  crown  of  the  antepenultimate  molar  is  quadrate  with  rounded  corners, 
and  is  composed  of  four  lobes.  The  postero-external  lobe  is  largest,  and  is 
crescentoid  conical.  The  postero-internal  lobe  is  smallest  and  conical,  and  is 
joined  at  the  summit  by  the  back  arm  of  the  postero-external  lobe.  The 
anterior  pair  of  lobes  are  connate,  and  are  joined  about  their  middle  by  the 
fore  arm  of  the  postero-external  lobe.  A  deep  angular  valley  occupies  the 
inner  part  of  the  crown  between  the  anterior  and  postero-internal  lobes,  and 
bounded  externally  by  the  postero-external  lobe.  A  basal  ridge  incloses  the 
outer  part  of  the  crown,  but  is  interrupted  in  the  most  prominent  part  of  the 
postero-external  lobe. 

The  crown  of  the  last  molar,  at  its  anterior  two  divisions,  is  composed  on 
the  same  plan  as  that  of  the  molar  in  advance,  but  it  is  prolonged  backward 
so  as  to  form  an  additional  lobe. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows: 

Lines. 

Dei)tli  of  lower  jaw  below  tlie  last  molar 2.1 

Space  occupied  by  the  last  two  molars '. 2.  4 

Breadth  of  second  molar 1.2 

Breadth  of  last  molar . .  ^ 1.  4 

The  genus  I  have  named  in  commemoration  of  Washakie,  chief  of  the 
Shoshone  Indians,  with  whom  I  had  the  pleasure  of  meeting  during  my  visit 
to  Fort  Bridger.  He  has  always  been  distinguished  for  his  high  characler, 
and  for  his  friendliness  to  the  white  race. 

ELOTHERIUM. 

In  tlie  American  Journal  of  Science  of  1871  Professor  Marsli  has  described 
a  molar  tooth,  from  Hejiry's  Fork  of  Green  River,  which  he  attributes  to  a 
suilline  pacliyderm  with  the  name  of  Elotherium  lentus.     The  specimen,  he 


-       -  125 

observes,  indicates  a  species  about  half  tlic  size  of  E.  Morfoni,  tlie  reiuaius 
of  wiiicli  are  found  in  the  Miocene  Tertiary  deposit  of  (he  Mauvaises  Terres 
of  White  River,  Dakota. 

Among  the  colh^ctions  of  fossils  from  the  Bridger  beds  I  have  seen  no 
remains  which  could  be  ascertained  to  belong  to  this  genus.  Figs.  28  and 
29,  Plate  VII,  represent  two  views  of  an  incisor  tooth  which  looks  as  if  it 
might  pertain  to  E.  Morto)ii.  The  specimen  was  found  by  Mr.  Pierce,  ol" 
Denver,  twenty  miles  southeast  of  Cheyenne  City,  Wyoming. 

REPTILIA. 

The  Bridger  Tertiary  formation,  in  comparison  with  the  earlier  Tertiaries 
of  White  Eiver,  Dakota,  and  of  the  Niobrara  River,  Nebraska,  is  remarkable 
for  the  variety  as  well  as  the  number  of  its  reptilian  remains.  Amid  the 
multitude  of  fossils  which  Rave  been  collected  in  the  latter  localities  nearly 
all  belong  to  mammals;  and  though  the  remains  of  turtles  are  abundant,  they 
appear  all  to  be  referable  at  most  to  a  single  species  for  each  locality.  No 
fragment  of  a  crocodilian,  lacertian,  or  serpent  has  yet  been  discovered  either 
in  the  Mauvaises  Terres  of  White  River,  Dakota,  nor  in  the  sands  of  the 
Niobrara  River,  Nebraska.  From  the  Bridger  beds  there  have  been  col- 
lected many  remains  of  different  species  of  crocodiles,  turtles,  lacertians,  and 
serpents. 

Order  Crocodilia. 

Body  lizard-like  in  form,  with  four  short  limbs  and  feet,  and  a  long, 
powerful  tail.  With  long  jaws,  provided  with  a  single  row  of  teeth  inserted 
in  distinct  sockets.     Skin  protected  by  bony  plates. 

CROCODILUS. 

The  Bridger  Tertiary  formation  contains  numerous  remains  of  crocodiles. 
Many  collected  by  Professor  Hayden's  party  in  1870,  and  olhcrs  obtained  by 
Drs.  Corson  and  Carter  during  the  same  and  the  succeeding  year,  have  been 
submitted  to  the  inspection  of  the  writer.  The  specimens  were  found  in 
various  localities  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger,  as  Little  Sandy  River,  Big 
Sandy  River,  Green  River,  Black's  Fork  of  the  same,  Church  Buttes,  Grizzly 
Buttes,  &c.  The  specimens  examined  indicate  several  species,  though  from 
their  generally  detached  and  imperfect  condition  we  have  not  been  able  to 
collocate  them  so  as  distinctly  and  clearly  to  establish  the  species.     Some  of 


126 

the  specimens  we  have  referred  to  two  named  species.  Professor  Marsh 
subsequently  named  five  species  from  remains  obtained  in  the  same  locali- 
ties during  his  exploration  of  1870.  Professor  Cope  has  more  recently  named 
four  additional  species.  It  is  probable  that  when  the  fossils  are  more  care- 
fully studied,  the  number  of  sjjecies  to  which  they  have  been  referred  will 
be  reduced. 

Crocodilus  aptus. 

This  species  was  originally  named  in  1869  from  a  fossil  preserved  in  the 
Greological  Cabinet  of  tlie  General  Land-Office  in  Washington.  The  speci- 
men was  obtained  by  Colonel  John  H.  Knight,  United  States  Army,  near 
South  Bitter  Creek,  Wyoming.  Though  consisting  of  a  detached  vertebra,  it 
especially  attracted  my  attention  from  having  previously  seen  no  remains  of 
crocodiles  in  the  large  collections  of  fossils  from  the  Tertiary  formations  of  the 
west. 

The  vertebra  represented  in  Fig.  2,  Plate  VIII,  belongs  to  the  cervical 
series,  and  resembles,  botli  in  size  and  form,  the  sixth  or  seventh  of  the  Mis- 
sissippi alligator.  The  bone  appears  to  have  been  of  mature  age,  and  seems 
thoroughly  petrified.  It  has  lost  the  greater  part  of  its  neural  arch  and 
dependent  processes,  but  is  otherwise  well  preserved.  From  portions  of 
adherent  matrix,  it  has  been  imbedded  in  arsofl  rock  similar  to  that  adherent 
to  some  of  the  bones  from  other  localities  above  mentioned. 

The  body  of  the  bone  in  its  axis  is  16  lines  long;  its  height  and  breadth 
in  front  are  14  lines.  The  hypopophysis,  directed  obliquely  downward  and 
forward,  as  in  the  alligator,  is  about  5  lines  long.  Back  of  the  process  the 
Ijody  is  less  prominently  carinated  than  in  the  latter  animal. 

Crocodilus  Elltotti. 

The  species  thus  named  was  originally  designated  from  a  specimen 
obtained,  during  Professor  Hay  den's  exploration  of  1870,  at  the  junction 
of  the  Big  Sandy  and  Green  Rivers.  It  consists  of  an  upper-jaw  fragment 
containing  two  teeth  and  portions  of  two  others,  and  is  represented  in  Fig.  4, 
Plate  VIII.  It  appears  to  be  the  anterior  portion  of  the  left  maxillary,  con- 
taining the  fourth  and  fifth  maxillary  teeth  and  the  fangs  of  the  two  succeed- 
ing ones.  The  shape  of  the  jaw-fragment  is  nearly  like  that  of  the  corre- 
sponding portion  of  the  upper  jaw  in  the  mugger  {Crocodilus  paluslris)  of 
India,  but  is  more  rugose  on  its  exterior  surface,  and  the  palatine  surface  is 


127 

more  vaulted.  The  teetli  retained  in  the  specimen  have  tlieir  crowns  only 
partially  protruded.  Tiiey  are  proportionately  more  robust,  or  shorter  and 
less  pointed,  than  in  the  mugger.  Strong  ridges  define  the  inner  from  the 
outer  surfaces  of  the  crown,  which  exhibits  no  indication  of  fluting,  but  the 
enamel  is  finely  and  closely  wrinkled  longitudinally. 

The  space  occupied  by  the  teeth,  from  the  fourth  to  the  seventh  inclusive, 
is  35  lines.  The  entire  length  of  the  fifth  or  largest  maxillary  tooth  is  esti- 
mated at  about  2^  inches.  The  protruded  portion  measures  externally  ^  of 
an  inch  in  length,  and  its  diameter  at  base  fore  and  aft  is  7J  lines,  and  trans- 
versely GJ  lines. 

Fig.  6,  Plate  VIII,  represents  a  large  portion  of  the  upper  part  of  a  skull, 
which  has  been  attributed,  but  with  no  certainty,  to  the  same  species  as  the 
foregoing.  The  specimen,  in  a  number  of  scattered  fragments  without  teeth, 
was  discovered,  by  Henry  W.  Elliott,  on  Little  Sandy  River,  during  Pro- 
fessor Hayden's  exploraticni  of  1870. 

The  fossil  indicates  a  form  of  skull  very  difierent  from  that  of  our  alligator, 
and  is  that  of  a  true  crocodile.  It  approached  in  form  more  tiiat  of  the  mugger  of 
India  or  of  the  Nile  crocodile  than  that  of  the  American  crocodile,  (C  ameri- 
canus.) 

The  cranium  above  is  remarkably  flat ;  from  its  lateral  borders  defined  by 
the  squamosals  and  post-frontals,  and  from  the  occipital  border  to  the  face  in 
advance  of  the  orbits,  it  forms  a  nearly  uniform  plane  with  no  depression  of 
the  forehead  nor  eversion  of  the  orbital  margins.  This  uniform  flatness  is 
also  extended  along  the  middle  of  the  face  to  the  muzzle.  This  and  the 
alveolar  borders  of  the  face  are  about  as  convex  as  in  the  mugger. 

The  sides  of  the  muzzle  are  deeply  notched  at  the  conjunction  of  the  pre- 
maxillaries  and  maxillaries,  and  the  bottom  of  the  notch  exhibits  a  conspicu- 
ous recess  for  the  accommodation  of  the  large  canine-like  tooth  of  the  man- 
dible. A  second  and  less  conspicuous  notch,  as  usual  in  the  true  crocodiles, 
occupies  a  position  about  the  middle  of  the  maxillaries. 

The  lateral  boi'ders  of  the  cranium  are  less  angular  or  more  rounded 
approaching  the  orbits  than  in  the  mugger  and  the  American  crocodile. 
The  superior  temporal  orifices  are  subrotund  and  nearly  as  wide  transversely 
as  fore  and  aft.  The  intervening  parietal  surface  is  broad  and  deeply 
l)itted.  The  temporal  surfaces  of  the  parietal  form  a  pair  of  deeply  concave 
recesses. 


128 

The  anterior  orl^ital  Ijorder,  as  constituted  by  tlie  prefrontals  and  lachry- 
mals, is  depressed  or  slopes  inwardly  toward  the  orbits. 

The  nasal  process  of  the  frontal  is  niucli  prolonged,  extending  2  inches 
in  advance  of  the  position  of  the  ant-orbital  margins.  The  prefrontals  are 
proportionately  long  and  narrow  compared  with  those  in  the  mugger.  Their 
length  is  about  4  inches ;  tlieir  breadth,  where  widest,  is  14  lines. 

The  nasals  are  broad  and  flat  at  the  back  part.  They  are  proportionately 
of  greater  breadth  than  in  the  mugger.  Their  estimated  length  is  9i  inches; 
their  breadth  together  in  advance  of  the  lachrymals  is  about  2J  inches. 

The  fore  part  of  the  face,  or  the  muzzle,  has  the  same  form  as  in  the  mugger 
and  other  true  crocodiles,  but  is  proportionately  less  thick  than  in  the  one 
specifically  mentioned.  The  nasal  orifice  holds  a  more  advanced  position 
than  usual,  so  that  the  alveolar  border  in  front  is  barely  more  than  half  the 
extent  it  is  in  the  mugger,  nor  is  it  perforated  as  in  the  latter  and  other  true 
crocodiles.  The  upper  surface  of  the  skull  is  everywhere  exceedingly  rugose, 
with  reticular  ridges  inclosing  deep  pits,  and  in  some  positions  is  deeply 
scored  by  vascular  gi'ooves. 

Four  teeth  occupied  the  sides  of  the  premaxillaries,  forming  an  unbroken 
row.  The  intermediate  pair  are  the  larger  and  of  nearly  equal  size ;  the 
others  are  also  nearly  of  equal  size.  The  tirst  tooth  did  not  occupy  the  fore 
part  of  the  premaxillary  as  usual,  in  the  true  crocodiles,  but  is  over  an  inch 
from  the  position  of  the  symphysis,  close  to  the  second  tooth.  A  large  recess 
occupies  the  fore  part  of  the  palatine  surface  of  the  premaxillary,  for  the 
accommodation  of  the  first  mandibular  tooth,  as  usual  in  the  crocodiles,  but  it 
is  closed  or  does  not  communicate  by  a  perforation  with  the  upper  surface  of 
the  premaxillary  border.  The  recess  holds  a  position  internal  to  the  first  pre- 
maxillary tooth.  Smaller  conical  recesses  occupy  the  intervals  internally  of 
the  succeeding  three  teeth. 

The  maxillary  appears  to  have  accommodated  fourteen  or  fifteen  teeth,  of 
which  the  fifth  one  was  the  largest,  as  in  other  crocodiles.  The  fourth,  in 
comparison  with  the  fifth  one,  .was  proportionately  larger  than  in  the  mugger, 
and  the  sixth  was  not  much  less  in  size. 

The  depth  of  the  socket  of  the  fifth  maxillary  tooth  is  full  2  inches ;  its 
fore  and  aft  diameter  about  f  inch.  The  depth  of  the  fourth  socket  is  20 
lines :  its  diameter  8  lines. 

The  premaxillary  teeth,  in  comparison  w  ith  those  of  the  mugger,  appear  to 


129 

have  l)cen  proportionately  about  as  large.     The  anterior  scries  of   maxillary 
teeth  were  rather  larger,  and  the  posterior  series  smaller. 

Detached  portions  of  both  quadrates  accompany  the  other  portions  of  the 
skull.  They  are  somewhat  peculiar  in  several  anatomical  points.  The  an- 
terior surface  is  unequally  divided  by  a  conspicuous  ridge,  descending  to 
within  an  inch  of  the  articular  surface  for  the  mandil:)le.  The  grooved  or 
trochlear  condition  of  the  latter  surface  is  much  more  decided  than  in  the 
mugger  or  the  American  crocodile. 

Measurements  taken  from  the  specimen  above  described  are  as  follows : 

luclics. 

Length  from  occipital  border  to  end  of  muzzle • 20 

Breadth  of  cranium  at  occipital  border  between  prominent  angles  of  .squamosals.  7 

Breadth  of  cranium  at  postorbital  angles 51 

Breadth  of  cranium  between  temporal  orifices . .  1 

Breadth  of  forehead  between  orbits I.1 

Breadth  of  temi)oral  orifices 1.^ 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  the  same 1^ 

Leugth  of  parietal 2;^ 

Length  of  frontal 5.1 

Bi'eadth  of  frontal  where  it  joins  the  post-frontals 2,^^ 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  the  orbits 2-^ 

Length  of  face  in  advance  of  the  orbits i:j.i 

Breadth  of  face  outside  the  fifth  maxillary  teeth (ja 

Breadth  of  muzzle  as  formed  by  premaxillaries 5 

Breadth  of  muzzle  at  notch  back  of  the  latter 4 

Leugth  of  i>remaxillaries G 

Breadth  of  nasal  orifice , 2A 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  the  same 2.^ 

Thickness  of  premaxillaries  in  advance  of  the  same ^ 

Estimated  length  of  entire  alveolar  border 14^ 

Space  occupied  by  the  anterior  five  maxillary  teeth 3f 

Space  occupied  by  the  posterior  five  maxillary  teeth 3 

Breadth  of  articular  surface  of  quadrate  for  the  mandible 2^ 

A  detached  basi-occipital,  obtained  near  Little  Sandy  River,  may,  perhaps, 
belong  to  the  same  species  as  the  preceding.  The  occipital  condyle  has 
nearly  as  great  a  vertical  as  a  transverse  diameter,  the  former  measuring  15 
lines,  the  latter  17  lines. 

The  last  summer  Dr.  Joseph  K.  Corson  sent,  as  a  gift  to  the  museum  of  the 
Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia,  a  specimen  consisting  nearly 
of  the  whole  of  the  lower  jaw  of  a  large  crocodile.  He  discovered  the  fossil 
imbedded  in  a  green  sandstone  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger.     In  removing 

it  from  its  matrix  it  was  much  broken,  and  most  of  the  teeth  were  destroyed. 
17   G 


loO 

The  left  ramus  in  a  restored  condition  is  represented  in  Fig.  8,  Plate  VIII, 
one-half  the  natural  size. 

The  lower  jaw  belonged  to  a  larger  animal  than  the  cranial  specimen  from 
Little  Sandy  River,  and  probably  pertained  to  a  different  species.  The  form 
of  the  jaw  is  nuich  like  that  of  the  mugger,  but  is  of  more  robust  proportionss 
The  rami,  in  their  dentary  portions,  are  much  thicker  in  proportion  to  their 
depth,  and  the  symphysis  is  of  greater  extent,  in  this  respect  presenting  a 
greater  resemblance  to  the  condition  iu  the  American  crocodile. 

The  dentary  portions  of  the  rami  the  greater  part  of  their  length  are  as 
thick  and  thicker  than  the  depth.  Half  way  between  the  symphysis  and  the 
median  enlargement  of  the  dentary  portion  of  the  ramus  the  thickness  is  over 
2  inches,  while  the  depth  is  ^  of  an  inch  less.  In  the  position  of  the  enlarge- 
ment just  mentioned,  the  thickness  is  2  inches  and  2  lines,  while  the  depth 
is  only  2  lines  moi'c.  The  symphysis  has  measured  about  44'  inches  fore  and 
aft,  and  liut  slightly  more  than  this  transversely  opposite  the  position  of  the 
large  canine-like  teeth. 

The  splenial  bone,  as  if  to  give  greater  strength  to  tlie  ponderous  jaw, 
extends  close  up  to  the  symphysis.  The  outer  portion  of  the  jaw  in  the  posi- 
tion occupied  by  the  teeth,  is  more  rounded  than  in  the  mugger.  The  back 
portion  of  the  jaw  in  form  and  constitution  appears  to  agree  with  that  in  the 
mugger.  The  outer  surfi\ce  of  the  jaw,  strongly  ll)veated  back  of  the  hu-ge 
oval  foramen,  presents  the  usual  vascular  grooved  and  perforated  appearance 
in  advance. 

AI)out  eighteen  teetli  occupied  each  ramus  of  the  jaw,  but  all  are  broken 
from  the  specimen  except  one.  Some  of  the  broken  and  detached  teeth 
accompany  the  jaw.  They  appear  to  have  been  comparatively  robust,  short, 
and  blunt,  conical  in  form,  and  but  feebly  curved.  The  enameled  crown  is 
rugose  and  longitudinally  grooved,  but  not  properly  fluted;  the  narrow  grooves 
separating  wider  convex  and  rugose  longitudinal  ridges.  They  sufficiently 
differ  from  those  in  the  jaw-specimen  referred  to  Crocodilus  Eltlotti  to  per- 
tain to  a  different  species. 

The  end  of  the  symphysis  of  the  jaw  ov  of  the  chin  is  l)rokcn  away,  so  that 
nothing  can  be  ascertained  in  regard  fo  the  first  pair  of  teeth  of  the  two 
i-ami.  A  lai'ge  tooth,  canine-like  in  its  relative  position  and  size,  as  usual  in 
the  crocodiles,  was  nund^er  t()nr  in  the  series.  Tlie  sof^kct,  occupied  by 
green-sand  matrix,  is  about  10  lines  in  diameter.     The  expansion  of  the  sym- 


131 

[ihysLs  in  the  position  of  this  socket  indicates  its  caniiic-likc  leelh  to  have 
been  accoaimodatcd  when  at  rest  iu  a  recess  of  the  upper  jaw  at  the  junction 
of  the  premaxillarics  and  inaxiikiries. 

Succeeding  the  canine  tooth  alveolus,  there  are  the  remains  and  sockets  oi" 
five  comparatively  small  teeth.  Then  followed  several  ol'  the  largest  teeth 
accommodated  by  the  second  expansion  of  the  jaw.  The  socket  for  the 
eleventh  tooth  is  about  the  size  of  that  of  the  canine  tooth.  In  the  left  ramus 
it  retains  the  tooth,  the  apex  of  which  alone  had  protruded.  After  tliis  tooth 
there  followed  a  series  of  five  others  which  successively  decreased  in  size. 

Measurements  of  the  lower  jaw  are  as  follows  : 

Incbes.   Lines. 

LeDgth  of  rami  of  lower  jaw 20  G 

Width  of  lower  jaw  outside  the  glcuoid  articn]ation.s 12  0 

Width  of  lower  jaw  a  short  distaace  in  front  of  the  glenoid  articulatious..  13  0 

Greatest  width  of  symphysis 4  o 

Width  of  jaw  at  second  enlargement,  below  the  eleventh  tooth (J  0 

Depth  of  jaw  at  oval  foramen 3  10 

Depth  of  last  tooth 2  8 

Depth  of  eleventh  tooth 2  4 

Thickness  below  the  eleventh  tooth , 2  2 

Depth  of  ramus  near  symphysis 1  !) 

Thickness  of  ramus  near  symphysis 2  2 

Extent  of  symphysis  fore  and  aft 4.  3 

Breadth  of  glenoid  articulation 2  7 

Length  of  hook-like  process  back  of  glenoid  articulation 2  5 

Space  occupied  by  the  teeth 11  0 

Length  of  oval  foramen 2  8 

W^idth  of  oval  foramen .' 0  11 

Fig.  1,  Plate  VIII,  represents  the  body  apparently  of  a  first  Inml^ar  verte- 
bra; and  Fig.  5  of  the  same  plate,  the  proximal  extremity  of  a  left  femur, 
large  enough  to  belong  to  the  same  animal  as  the  cranium  above  described. 


rp 


The  two  specimens  were  found  together  by  Professor  Hayden's  party  near 
Little  Sandy  Eiver.  They  present  no  decided  peculiarity  distinguishing  them 
from  the  corresponding  part  in  the  living  crocodiles.  The  shaft  of  the  femur 
contains  a  medullary  cavity  larger  than  usual  in  the  latter,  and  in  the  specimen 
it  is  filled  with  chalcedony. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimens  are  as  follows: 

Line.s. 

Length  of  body  of  first  lumbar  vertebra  beneath 20 

Depth  of  body  anteriorly 18 

Width  of  body  anteriorly ' 18 

Width  of  head  of  the  femur 20 

Diameter  of  shaft  below  the  inner  process 12^ 


132 

Fig.  3,  Plate  VIII,  represents  a  specimen  of  a  first  caudal  vertebra  of  a 
smaller  species  of  crocodile  than  those  indicated  by  the  preceding  specimens. 
It  was  obtained  by  Professor  Hayden's  party  near  Little  Sandy  River.  The 
length  of  the  body  with  its  double  ball  is  21J  lines.  Several  other  vertebra? 
from  Black's  Fork  of  Green  River,  and  from  near  Church  Buttes,  Wyoming, 
from  their  size  and  conformation,  would  appear  to  belong  to  the  same  species. 

Order  Chelonia 

No  other  Tertiary  deposit  in  North  America  has  yielded  such  an  abun- 
dance of  remains  of  different  species  and  genera  of  turtles  as  the  Bridger  beds. 
The  fossils  represent  a  large  proportion  of  fresh-water  and  paludal  forms  ;  the 
others  pertain  to  land  tortoises.  Fragments  of  turtle-shells  are  the  most  fre- 
quent of  the  vertebrate  fossils  met  with,  strewed  on  the  bare  tops  and  sides  of 
the  buttes  or  among  the  debris  at  their  base.  Entire  shells  are  comparatively 
rare,  and  if  they  have  been  complete  as  fossils,  they  soon  undergo  disintegra- 
tion after  exposure  on  the  Inittes.  Most  of  them  have  been  much  crushed, 
while  embedded,  under  pressure  of  the  superincumbent  strata,  and  now  when 
exposed  from  the  softening  of  the  matrix  they  readily  fall  to  pieces. 

The  greater  quantity  of  the  turtle  remains  are  referable  to  a  species  of  fresh- 
water terrapin  of  the  genus  Emys,  the  shells  of  which  present  sufficient  variety 
as  to  have  at  first  misled  me  in  referring  them  to  several  different  species. 
The  next  most  abundant  remains  are  those  of  one  or  two  species  of  soft-shelled 
turtles  of  the  genus  Triouyx,  and  after  these  the  remains  of  a  large  land-tor- 
toise. Besides  the  species  and  genera  described  in  the  succeeding  pages. 
Professor  Cope  has  recently  indicated  a  number  of  others  from  the  same  for- 
mation. 

TESTUDO. 
Testudo  Corsoni. 

Among  the  many  remains  of  turtles  from  the  Bridger  Tertiary  beds  are 
those  a^jparently  of  a  large  land-tortoise.  Small  and  for  the  most  part  un- 
characteristic fragments  of  the  shell  were  obtained  by  Dr.  Carter  in  1869 
and  during  Professor  Hayden's  exploration  of  1870,  but  it  was  not  until  I 
received  the  specimen  represented  in  Fig.  7,  Plate  XV,  that  I  recognized  the 
character  of  the  species  to  which  they  pertained. 

The  last-mentioned  specimen   was  discovered  by  Dr.  Corson  at  Grizzly 


133 

BiiJtes.  It  consists  of  the  anterior  extremity  oftlie  under  shield  or  ])Iastron, 
consisting  of  the  fore  part  of  the  episternals  and  the  end  of  the  entosternal. 
The  specimen  might  l)e  supposed  to  belong  to  an  Emys,  but  its  resemblance 
in  form  with  the  corresponding  part  in  living  species  of  Testudo  leads  me  to 
place  it  with  this  genus.  The  episternals  project  together  rather  abruptly 
into  a  long,  thick,  and  broad  spade-like  process,  nearly  straight  at  the  front 
border,  but  slightly  notched  at  the  middle.  The  projection  behind  is  defined 
by  the  outer  extremities  of  deep  grooves  defining  the  gular  and  humeral  scute 
impressions.  Its  lower  surface  is  strongly  convex ;  the  upper  surface  slopes 
forward  to  the  acute  border  of  the  process. 

Back  of  the  gular  surface  above,  the  plastron  is  deeply  concave,  but  is  not 
excavated  beneath  the  former  as  in  the  gopher,  {Testudo  Carolina.) 

The  end  of  the  entosternal  plate  is  impressed  l>y  the  contiguous  ends  of  the 
gular  scutes.  The  episternal  process  is  about  2  inches  long ;  its  breadth  at 
base  is  5^  inches.  The  extremity  of  the  process  is  3|  inches  in  width.  The 
thickest  part  of  the  episterna  measures  IJ  inch. 

The  species  I  have  named  in  honor  of  its  discoverer.  Dr.  Joseph  K.  Corson, 
United  States  Army,  who  to  a  love  of  his  profession  adds  a  special  interest 
in  the  promotion  of  the  natural  sciences. 

During  my  recent  trip  to  Fort  Bridger  I  was  so  fortunate  as  to  obtain  a 
number  of  additional  specimens  referable  to  Testudo  Corsoni.  Some  of  them 
had  been  previously  collected  I)y  Drs.  Corson  and  Carter,  and  others  were 
found  during  our  explorations  of  the  battes  near  Fort  Bridger,  and  those  of 
Dry  Creek  ten  miles  from  the  former. 

One  of  the  best  preserved  specimens  consists  of  a  nearly  complete  ventral 
shield  or  plastron,  represented  in  Fig.  2,  Plate  XXX.  This  was  discovered 
by  Dr.  Corson  at  Grizzly  Buttes,  and  presented  by  him  to  the  Academy.  In 
the  complete  condition  it  has  measured  upward  of  2  feet  in  length,  and  is 
estimated  to  have  been  about  IG  inches  in  breadth  to  its  sutural  conjunction 
with  the  upper  shell. 

In  its  form  and  propoi'tions  it  resembles  that  of  the  living  Testudo  radJala 
of  Madagascar  more  than  it  does  that  of  the  great  Galapagos  tortoise. 
.  The  lobes  of  the  plastron  are  of  nearly  equal  length  and  breadth.  The 
prolonged  extremity  or  spade-like  process  of  the  anterior  lobe  is  lost  in  the 
specimen.  The  posterior  lobe  terminates  in  a  deep,  wide,  angular  notch 
included  by  two  angular  processes. 

The  fore  part  of  the  anterior  lobe  is  slightly  bent  ujiward  and  nearly  straight 


134 

transversely.  The  plastron  Iroui  the  position  of  the  pectoral  scute  impres- 
sion l)ackwar(l  becomes  gradually  and  deeply  concave.  The  deeper  part  of 
.the  concavity  is  defined  on  the  posterior  lobe  of  the  plastron  by  a  narrow  flat 
ledge  laterally,  which  widens  behind  on  the  angular  processes  terminating  the 
plastron.  The  sternal  bridges  are  moderately  convex,  and  are  wide  fore  and 
aft. 

The  anatomical  structure  of  the  osseous  plastron  and  the  relative  position 
and  number  of  its  scutes  are  the  same  as  in  modern  species  of  Testudo. 

The  entosternal  bone  is  subpyriform  and  wider  than  long.  Its  fore  extrem- 
ity reaches  just  in  advance  of  the  ends  of  the  gular  scute  impressions,  and  its 
back  border  reaches  the  groove  defining  the  humeral  and  pectoral  scute 
impressions. 

All  the  grooves  defining  the  scute  impressions  are  well  marked,  being  deep 
and  wide.  The  proportions  of  the  scute  impressions  are  nearly  the  same  as 
in  recent  testudines. 

The  pectoral  scute  impression  is  longer  at  both  extremities  than  interme- 
diately. The  groove  defining  it  in  front,  commencing  externally  just  in 
advance  of  the  bottom  of  the  axilla,  curves  backward  and  inward,  and  then 
turns  forward  and  inward  to  the  position  of  the  back  suture  of  the  entosternal 
plate. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows : 

Inches. 

Estimated  length  iu  median  line  to  bottom  of  poststerual  uotcli 24 

Estimated  leugtli  on  each  side  to  ends  of  poststerual  processes 20^ 

Estimated  width 2o" 

Estimated  length  of  anterior  lobe  of  plastron  in  median  line 8 

Length  of  posterior  lobe  of  plastron  iu  median  line 5 

Length  of  posterior  lobe  of  plastron  laterally 7 

Width  of  anterior  lobe  at  bottom  of  axilla; 12 

Width  of  posterior  lobe  at  bottom  of  inguinal  fossa; 13 

Width  at  bottom  of  anterior  prolongation  of  i^lastrou 5 

Width  at  ends  of  poststerual  angular  processes 7i 

Depth  of  ijoststernal  notch 2J 

Width  fore  and  aft  of  sternal  bridge 9^ 

Length  of  entosternal  plate 4J 

Width  of  entosternal  plate 5^ 

Length  of  hyosternal  plate  in  median  line (i^ 

Length  of  hyposternal  plate  iu  median  line 5^ 

Length  of  xiphisternal  plate  in  median  line 4^ 

Length  of  pectoral  scute  impressions  iu  median  line , 1^ 

Length  of  i)ectoral  scute  impressions  where  narrowest 1 

Length  of  abdominal  scute  impressions  iu  median  line 9 

Length  of  femoral  scute  impressions  in  median  line 3j 


135 

Inebes. 

Length  of  caudal  scuto  impressions  in  median  line 2^ 

Tliickuess  of  plastron  at  base  of  anterior  prolongation liJ 

Thickness  of  anterior  lobe  laterally  near  bottom  of  axilla 1 

Thickness  of  posterior  lobe  near  bottom  of  inguinal  fossa 1^ 

Thickness  of  plastron  near  the  center iJ 

During  a  day's  excursion  to  Dry  Creek  Buttes,  ten  miles  from  Fort  Bridger, 
Mrs.  Anna  Carter,  the  wife  of  Dr.  Carter,  who  accompanied  us,  discovered  a 
large  turtle  jiartially  imbedded  in  a  green  sandstone  on  the  top  of  a  butte. 
The  upper  shield  had  been  destroyed  by  recent  exposure,  but  the  nearly  com- 
plete plastron  was  obtained  by  removing  the  cast  of  the  shell  above  it.  The 
sutural  connections  of  the  bones  are  somewhat  obscured  by  the  firm  adhei'ence 
of  particles  of  sand.  It  retains  the  anterior  spade-like  process  nearly  entire, 
and  this  is  represented  in  Fig.  4,  Plate  XXX. 

The  specimen  presents  some  differences  from  the  former,  which,  however, 
I  have  not  regarded  as  specific,  though  they  may  be  so.  The  spade-like  pro- 
longation of  the  plastron  is  more  abrupt  and  considerably  longer  than  in  the 
fragment  upon  which  the  species  was  originally  founded.  The  fore  part  of 
the  anterior  lobe  of  the  plastron  approaching  the  lateral  border  along  the 
groove  defining  the  gular  and  humeral  scute  impressions  is  much  more  convex 
than  in  either  of  the  preceding  specimens.  From  the  position  of  the  entoster- 
num  backward,  the  plastron  becomes  concave,  as  in  the  former  specimen,  but 
the  concavity  is  comparatively  shallow.  The  poststernal  notch  is  also  of  less 
depth  than  in  the  previous  specimen,  but  otherwise  the  plastron  is  sufficiently 
like  the  latter  to  pertain  to  the  same  species. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Inches. 

Length  of  plastron  in  median  line ^5 

Length  of  plastron  on  each  side  2Gi 

Width  of  plastron  at  middle,  estimated  at  about 20 

Length  of  anterior  lobe 9 

Length  of  posterior  lobe  at  middle 6 

Length  of  posterior  lobe  to  ends  of  angular  processes 8i 

Width  of  anterior  lobe  at  base 12 

Width  of  posterior  lobe  at  base HJ 

Length  of  episternal  prolongation 2i 

Width  of  episternal  prolongation  at  base ^i 

Width  of  episternal  prolongation  near  end ^'i 

Breadth  of  sternal  bridges  fore  and  aft ^ 

Breadth  at  ends  of  poststernal  angular  processes 'i 

Depth  of  poststernal  notch 1 4 

Length  of  entosternal  boue •  -  •  ■  4? 

Bi'eadth  of  entosternal  bou(> ^i 


106 

In  some  low  Ijuttes  on  the  road  to  Carter  Station,  about  three  miles  from 
Fort  Bridger,  Dr.  Carter  found  a  large  turtle,  which  I  viewed  as  jjertainiiig 
to  Tcstudo  Corsoni.  As  it  lay  partially  exposed  it  measured  about  2  feet  4 
inches  in  length,  and  approximated  2  feet  in  breadth.  It  was  so  much 
broken  that  in  the  attempt  to  remove  it,  it  fell  into  a  multitude  of  fragments. 

In  Dry  Creek  Canon  we  discovered  another  turtle,  which  I  viewed  as  T. 
Corsoni.  The  shell  was  in  great  part  decomposed,  but  the  rock  which  had 
occupied  the  interior  still  preserved  its  form.  From  this  cast  we  estimated 
the  shell  to  measure  28  inches  long,  20  inches  broad,  and  14  inches  high. 

Another  specimen  of  a  large  turtle,  discovered  by  Dr.  Corson  on  the  buttes 
of  Dry  Creek,  consisted  of  fragments  of  a  plastron  with  a  few  marginal  plates 
of  the  carapace.  The  plastron,  of  which  we  have  been  enabled  to  restore 
the  greater  part  of  the  anterior  lobe,  presents  peculiarity  enough  to  pertain 
to  a  distinct  species  from  T.  Corsoni.  It  was  about  the  size  and  proportions 
of  the  plastron  attributed  to  the  latter,  but  the  episternals  are  neither  so 
aljruptly  nor  so  much  prolonged  as  in  the  former  specimens,  and  the  front 
part,  as  represented  in  Fig.  3,  Plate  XXX,  is  decidedly  notched.  The  under 
surface  of  the  extremity  of  the  anterior  lobe  is  flatter. 

The  bony  construction  of  the  plastron,  so  far  as  preservecf,  is  the  same  as 
in  the  former  specimens,  and  the  entosternal  is  nearly  of  the  same  size  and 
hape. 

The  scute  impressions  are  also  the  same  as  in  the  former  specimens,  except 
that  the  pectoral  scute  impressions  arc  nearly  twice  as  long. 

Fragments  from  the  back  lobe  of  the  plastron  retaining  the  bottom  of  the 
poststernal  notch  indicate  this  to  be  more  acute  than  in  the  former  speci- 
mens. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows : 

lutbes. 

Length  of  anterior  lobe  of  the  plastrou 8 

Breadth  at  base ]0J 

Length  of  episternal  prolongation ] ;i 

Breadth  of  episternal  prolongation  at  base 5i 

Breadth  of  episternal  prolongation  near  the  extremity 4^ 

Length  of  entosternal  plate 4J 

Breadth  of  entosternal  plate 5J 

Length  of  gular  scute  imi^ressions 3^ 

Length  of  humeral  scute  impressions 4J 

Length  of  pectoral  scute  impressions "    3 

Length  of  pectoral  scute  impressions  where  least , . .       li 


s 


•I  07 

Portions  of  llic  sliell  ol'  anolhcr  specimen,  apparently  referable  to  Tesludo 
Corso)//,  were  discovered  by  Dr.  Corson  on  Dry  Creek  Buttes.  Several  of 
the  fragments  so  far  recompose  one  side  of  the  back  lobe  of  the  plastron  as 
to  determine  its  identity  with  that  of  T.  Corsoni.  It  is  especially  interesting 
irom  its  being  accompanied  b}^  a  number  of  fragments  of  the  upper  shell, 
wliich  being  reunited  compose  the  middle  portion,  as  represented  in  Fig.  1, 
Plate  XXX.  Tills  specimen  tends  to  confirm  what  I  have  latterly  suspected, 
namely,  tliat  the  specimens  formerly  described  anil  represented  in  Plate  XI, 
under  the  name  of  Emys  Carteri,  really  belong  to  Tesludo  Corsoni.  The 
specimens  originally  referred  to  the  former,  though  much  naore  complete 
than  the  one  upon  which  the  latter  was  founded,  completely  misled  me.  The 
spade-like  process  of  the  plastron  was  not  simply  broken  off,  but,  while 
imbedded  in  its  matrix,  was  crushed  or  squeezed  off  in  such  a  manner  as  to 
leave  but  little  trace  of  its  true  character.  The  accompanying  portion  of  the 
carapace  exhibited  the  costal  plates  with  strong  costal  capitula  as  in  living 
species  of  Emys.  This  emydoid  character  with  others  are  probably  suffi- 
cient indications  that  the  specimens  would  properly  be  referable  to  a  genus 
distinct  from  either  Testudo  or  Emys,  and  is  probably  the  same  as  that 
recently  proposed  by  Professor  Cope,  under  the  name  of  Hadrianus. 

The  specimens  originally  referred  to  Emijs  Carteri,  1)ut  now  viewed  as 
pertaining  to  Testudo  Corsoni,  were  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  in  the  buttes 
near  Fort  Bridger.  They  consist  of  the  greater  part  of  a  mutilated  plastron 
with  the  ends  broken  off,  and  the  anterior  median  portion  of  the  carapace. 

The  plastron  represented  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  XI,  resembles,  in  its  size,  form, 
and  proportions,  the  nearly  complete  specimen  above  described  and  repre- 
sented in  Fig.  2,  Plate  XXX.  It  is  not  so  concave  posteriorly,  but  other- 
wise presents  nothing  peculiar. 

The  portion  of  the  carapace  represented  in  Fig.  2,  Plate  XI,  consists  of 
the  nuchal  and  anterior  three  vertebral  plates  with  fragments  of  the  contig- 
uous costal  plates. 

The  anterior  border  of  the  fragment  is  slightly  emarginate.  The  vertebral 
region  is  flat,  and  slopes  forward  from  the  anterior  half  of  the  first  vertebral 
plate.  The  nuchal  plate  is  nearly  as  long  as  wide,  and  its  antero-lateral 
borders  are  moderately  convergent. 

The  first  vertebral  i)late  is  clavate  in  outline  with  the  broad  end  behind. 
The  anterior  narrow  end  dips  into  an  emargination  of  the  nuchal  plate.  Its 
widest  part  is  less  than  a  fourili  of  its  length  in  advance  of  its  posterior 
■     18  G 


138 

border.  The  second  vertebral  plate  presents  the  usual  hexagonal  coffin-like 
outlhie,  l)iit  in  a  reversed'  position,  its  broadest  part  being  about  one-fifth  of 
ils  length  in  advance  of  its  liack  border.  Tlie  third  vertebral  plate  is  oblong 
quadrate,  with  the  fore  and  lateral  borders  convex,  and  the  back  one  nearly 
straight. 

The  sutures  defining  the  first  costal  plate  depart  from  the  anterior  narrow 
end  and  the  posterior  widest  part  of  the  first  vertebral  plate.  The  scute 
impressions  of  the  carapace  are  well  defined  Ijy  deep  grooves. 

The  nuchal  scute  impression  is  flat,  and  widens  anteriorly.  Tiie  first  mar- 
ginal scute  impression  is  wider  than  long. 

The  first  vertebral  scute  area  is  longer  than  broad,  and  is  purse-like  in 
outline. 

The  second  vertebral  scute  area  is  also  longer  than  broad,  and  is  quadrate, 
with  the  lateral  borders  nearly  parallel. 

The  fragment  of  the  carapace  from  its  front  border  to  the  back  l>order  of 
the  third  vertebral  plate  measures  134  inches. 

Other  measurements  of  the  carapace  are  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Length  of  nuchal  plate 50 

Breadth  of  nuchal  plate  iu  front 44 

Breadth  of  uuchal  plate  where  widest GO 

Length  of  first  vertebral  plate 48 

Breadth  of  first  vertebral  plate  in  front 9 

Breadth  of  first  vertebral  plate  where  widest '. 30 

Breadth  of  first  vertebral  j)late  at  back  border  14 

Length  of  second  vertebral  plate 27 

Breadth  of  second  vertebral  plate  where  widest 20 

Breadth  of  second  vertebral  plate  at  back  border 10 

Length  of  third  vertebral  plate 29 

Breadth  of  third  vertebral  plate  at  middle 22 

Breadth  of  third  vertebral  plate  at  back  border .■ 17 

Length  of  nuchal  scnte  impression 21 

Breadth  of  nuchal  scute  impression  iu  front 11 

Breadth  of  nuchal  scute  impression  behind 0 

Length  of  first  marginal  scute  impression 20 

Breadth  of  first  marginal  scute  impression  behind 38 

Length  of  first  vertebral  scute  impression 07 

Breadth  of  first  vertebral  scute  impression  in  front 32 

Breadth  of  first  vertebral  scute  impression  near  middle r>2 

Breadth  of  first  vertebral  scute  impression  at  back  border 43 

Length  of  second  vertebral  scute  impression 58 

Breadth  of  second  vertebral  scute  impression  at  middle 48 

The  accompanying  plastron  measured,  in  its  complete  condition,  upward 

of  2  feet  in  length  and  about  1  i  feet  in  breadth. 


139 

Other  luoasunMnoiiis  oftlio  specimen  are  as  I'ollovvs  : 

Linos. 

Widtli  of  iinterior  lob(^  of  pliistrou  at  base lO.S 

Width  of  posterior  lobe  of  plastron  at  base ll'l) 

Breadth  of  sternal  bridyos  fore  and  aft 114 

Length  of  entosterual  plate 50 

Breadth  of  entosternal  plate (i.'! 

Length  of  hyosteruals  iu  median  line  of  plastron GO 

Length  of  hyposteruals  in  median  line  of  plastron Gl 

Length  of  humeral  scute  impressions 48 

Length  of  pectoral  scute  impressions 2G 

Length  of  abdominal  scute  impressions 82 

Length  of  femoral  scute  impressions 47 

The  portion  of  a  carapace  represented  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  XXX,  and  previ- 
ously referred  to  as  tending  to  confirm  tlie  impression  tiiat  Emys  Carterl  was 
the  same  as  Testudo  Corsoid,  retains  most  of  the  vertebral  plates  with  contig- 
uous fragments  of  tlie  costal  plates. 

The  anterior  three  vertebral  plates,  corresponding  with  those  which  are 
retained  in  the  specimen  originally  referred  to  Emys  Carteri,  have  the  same 
form,  but  are  wider.  The  succeeding  two  plates  have  the  same  form  as  the 
second  vertebral  plate  in  a  reversed  position.  The  sixth  vertebral  plate  is 
too  much  broken  to  ascertain  its  exact  form,  but  it  would  appear  to  be  nearly 
the  same  as  those  in  advance.  The  seventh  plate  is  hexagonal,  with  the 
breadth  more  than  twice  the  length  ;  and  the  eighth  plate  has  the  same  form, 
but  is  not  so  broad. 

The  length  of  the  fragment  of  the  carapace  from  the  anterior  broken  end 
of  the  first  vertebral  plate  to  the  back  border  of  the  eighth  plate  is  10  inches. 

Other  meastirements  are  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Length  of  first  vertebral  plate,  estimated 40 

Breadth  of  first  vertebral  plate  in  front 14 

Breadth  of  first  vertebral  plate  where  widest ?>1 

Breadth  of  first  vertebral  plate  at  back  border 17 

Length  of  second  vertebral  plate 27 

Breadth  of  second  vertebral  plate  where  widest 28 

Breadth  of  second  vertebral  plate  at  back  border 18 

Length  of  third  vertebral  plate 28 

Breadth  of  third  vertebral  plate  at  middle -*3 

Length  of  fourth  vertebral  plate 20 

]3readth  of  fourth  vertebral  plate  in  front 29 

Length  of  fifth  vertebral  plate -  24 

Breadth  of  fifth  vertebral  plate  in  front 27 

Length  of  sixth  vertebral  plate 20 


140 

Linos. 

Length  of  seventh  vertebral  plate 13 

Breadth  of  seventh  vertebral  plate. 28 

Length  of  eighth  vertebral  plate 13 

Breadth  of  eighth  vertebral  plate 24 

The  costal  capitulti  of  Testudo  Corsoni  appear  in  the  specimens  as  robust 
conical  eminences,  with  a  Ijroad,  expanding  base,  and  are  proportionately 
better  developed  than  in  living  species  of  Testudo,  and  even  many  of  the 
species  of  Emys. 

Figs.  2,  3,  Plate  XXIX,  represent  the  upper  extremity  of  a  humerus,  and  Fig. 
4  the  lower  extremity  of  a  femur,  which  were  found  in  association  with  the 
fragment  of  a  carapace  last  described,  and  may  reasonably  be  supposed  to  per- 
tain to  the  same  animal.  Both  fragments  resemble  the  corresponding  parts 
of  a  modern  Testudo. 

The  head  of  the  humerus  has  an  inner  trochlear  extension,  as  in  recent 
species  of  Testudo.  Independent  of  this  process,  the  transverse  diameter  of 
the  head  is  nearly  as  great  as  the  fore  and  aft  diameter.  In  the  specimen  it 
presents  a  discoidal,  flat  surface,  but  this  is  evidently  accidental. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimens  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Breadth  of  humerus  between  tuberosities  29 

Breadth  between  outer  tuberosity  and  inner  extension  of  the  head 32 

Breadth  of  the  head  with  its  inner  trochlea _ 20 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  the  head 17 

Breadth  of  the  distal  end  of  the  femur 2-1 

EMYS. 
Emys  wyomingensis. 

Of  the  many  remains  of  turtles  from  the  Bridgcr  Tertiary  deposits  I  have 
had  an  opportunity  of  examining,  most  of  them  appeaf  to  me  to  belong  to  a 
species  of  Emys,  which  presents  so  much  variation  in  anatomical  details  that 
the  first  specimens  brought  to  my  notice  were  viewed  as  pertaining  to  no  less 
than  four  distinct  species.  These  were  named  Emys  imjomingensis,  E.  Steven- 
sonianus,  E.  Jeanesi,  and  E.  Haydeni.  A  subsequent  examination  of  ad- 
ditional specimens,  collected  by  Dr.  J  .Van  A.  Carter  and  Dr.  Joseph  K.  Cor- 
son, United  States  Army,  and  presented  by  them  to  the  Academy  of  Natural 
Sciences  of  Philadelphia,  has  led  me  to  regard  all  those  indicated  under  the 
above  names  as  really  pertaining  to  a  single  species.  I  admit  that  I  may  be 
wrong  in  this  determination,  but  if  such  is  the  case,  it  would  appear  that 
almost  every  specimen  presents  characters  to  distinguish  a  species. 


141 

Regarding  all  the  specimens  under  consideration  as  pertaining  to  a  single 
species,  this  would  retain  the  original  name  of  Emys  wyomingensis. 

The  composition  of  the  shell  so  far  as  relates  to  the  attachment  of  the 
carapace  and  plastron,  the  number  of  bones  or  plates  and  the  number  and 
relation  of  the  corneous  scutes,  is  the  same  as  in  living  species  of  the  genus 
Emys. 

In  the  mature  condition,  the  shell  of  Emys  ivyomingensis  is  upward  of  a 
foot  in  length,  with  about  tliree-fourths  the  same  measurement  iu  breadth. 

To  what  degree  the  shell  varies  in  form,  that  is  to  say  in  relation  of  length 
and  breadth  with  the  height,  and  in  outline,  cannot  be  determined  from  the 
material  at  command,  on  account  of  the  imperfection  of  the  specimens,  or 
their  distortion  from  the  original  condition,  due  to  pressure  or  to  a  crushing 
force  applied  to  them  while  imbedded  in  the  strata  from  which  they  were  ob- 
tained. 

The  elements  of  composition,  especially  the  vertebral  plates  and  scutes, 
differ  more  or  less  in  different  specimens,  both  in  form  and  in  the  relation  of 
length  to  the  breadth.  While  the  length  of  the  vertebral  scutes  in  general 
exceeds  the  breadth,  especially  in  the  case  of  those  intermediate,  in  some 
specimens  even  to  the  extent  of  being  a  third  greater,  it  nevertheless  varies 
so  much  that  in  some  instances  it  barely  exceeds  the  breadth.  The  verte- 
bral plates  vary  in  the  same  manner  in  different  specimens,  nor  does  this 
variation  always  accord  with  that  of  the  same  character  in  the  vertebral  scutes, 
that  is  to  say  the  elongation  of  the  scutes  is  not  always  accom|)anied  in  a 
proportionate  degree  with  elongation  of  the  plates. 

1.  Emys  tvyomingensis  was  originally  described  from  an  isolated  episternal 
bone,  sent  to  the  writer  by  Dr.  Carter.  It  was  the  first  of  the  remains  of 
turtles  from  the  Bridger  Tertiary  deposits,  which  could  be  referred  to  the 
genus.  It  is  represented  in  Fig.  5,  Plate  IX,  and  exhibits  the  usual  form  of 
that  in  living  species,  but  further  presents  the  appearance  of  being  impressed 
by  a  narrow  intergular  scute.  The  presence  of  the  latter  I  suspect  to  be  ac- 
cidental or  anomalous,  though  it  may  be  normal,  and  may  really  indicate  that 
the  fossil  belongs  to  a  species  distinct  from  those  which  I  am  now  disposed 
to  view  as  the  same.  The  front  of  the  specimen  is  truncated  and  slightly 
notched  at  the  outer  part. 

2,  3.  Emys  Stevensonianus  is  the  name  originally  given  to  a  supposed 
species  founded  on  the  specimens  represented  in  Figs.  2,  4,  Plate  IX.     These 


142 

were  collected  l)y  Dr.  Carter  in  the  vicinity  ot"  Fort  Bridger,  and  t<ent  to  the 
Smithsonian  Iiistitntion,  whence  I  obtained  them  for  examination.  The 
specimens  consist  of  portion  of  a  carapace,  Fig,  2,  and  portions  of  two  plas- 
trons, Figs.  3,  4.  Slight  difference  in  the  corresponding  portion  of  the  latter 
specimens  with  that  attributed  to  E.  icyomingensis,  but  especially  the  absence 
of  any  evidence  of  an  intergular  scute,  led  to  their  being  referred  to  another 
species. 

The  sternal  specimen,  represented  in  Fig.  3,  accompanied  the  portion  of  a 
carapace,  represented  in  Fig.  2,  and  from  its  appearance  was  assumed  to  have 
belonged  to  the  same  individual. 

In  the  sternal  specimen  just  indicated,  the  entosternal  plate  is  lozenge-shaped 
in  outline,  l)ut  constricted  at  the  middle  of  its  posterior  part.  Its  length  is 
equal  to  the  breadth,  but  the  evidence  from  the  isolated  episternal,  first  re- 
ferred to  E.  wi/ominge7isls,  is  that  its  entosternal  was  wider  than  long. 

The  divisions  of  the  plastron  and  its  impress  by  scutes,  as  seen  in  the  more 
perfect  specimen,  appear  to  agree  pretty  closely  with  the  arrangement  ob- 
served in  ordinary  living  emydes. 

The  second  sternal  specimen,  represented  in  Fig.  4,  was  supposed  to  ])er- 
tain  to  the  same  species  as  the  former  one,  though  exhibiting  differences 
whicli  rather  approached  it  nearer  to  that  first  referred  to  E.  loyomingensis, 
except  that  it  exhibited  no  trace  of  the  existence  of  an  intergular  scute.  The 
entosternal  bone  is  wider  than  long,  and  without  conspicuous  constriction  at 
its  posterior  part.  The  anterior  truncated  border  of  the  episternuin  is  con- 
spicuously notched  at  its  outer  part. 

In  all  the  sternal  specimens  indicated,  the  gular  and  humeral  scutes  have 
doubled  over  the  edge  and  extended  upon  the  upper  surface  in  the  same  man- 
ner as  in  living  emydes. 

In  the  carapaceal  specimen,  Fig.  2,  the  vertebral  plates,  consisting  of  the 
series  from  the  first  to  the  eighth,  inclusive,  successively  decrease  in  length 
except  that  the  third  is  a  little  longer  than  the  second,  and  the  llnirtli  and 
ilflh  arc  nearly  ecpud.  To  the  fourth  inclusive,  the  length  much  exceeds  the 
breadth,  but  they  successively  diminish  in  this  proportion.  The  fifth  is  but 
slightly  longer  than  wide,  and  the  remaining  plates  are  much  wider  than  long. 
The  second  and  fifth  are  of  the  same  width,  and  in  this  respect  exceed  the 
finst  and  intermediate  ones,  which  are  likewise  of  neai'ly  uniform  breadth. 
The  sixth  plate  is  the  widest  of  the  scries;  the  others  successively  diminish. 


143 

They  exhibit  Ihe  usual  ('onus,  Ihc  first  l)ciiig  oblong  with  the  borders  convex 
outwardly,  the  others  to  tiie  lifth  being  wide  coffin-shaped,  and  the  remaining 
ones  are  more  regularly  hexagonal. 

The  second  and  third  vertebral  scute-spaces  are  quadrate  with  the  lateral 
defining-grooves  strongly  double  sigmoid.  The  second  space  is  Ijroader  than 
long,  but  the  third  is  the  reverse. 

4.  It  was  the  nearly  complete  shell,  represented  in  Plate  X,  which  was 
attributed  to  a  different  species  from  the  former  specimens,  under  the  name 
of  Emys  Jeanesi.  This  fine  fossil  was  obtained  near  Fort  Bridger,  Wyoming, 
during  Professor  Hayden's  exploration  of  1870.  It  is  considerably  distorted 
from  pressure,  the  right  side  being  crushed  inwardly  so  as  to  be  nearly  ver- 
tical. The  shell,  completely  petrified  like  all  its  associate  fossils,  is  filled 
with  a  greenish-gray  sandstone.  Its  prominence  or  convexity  in  the  original 
condition  was  perhaps  not  greater  than  in  some  of  the  ordinary  living  emydes, 
but  it  is  apparently  more  prominent,  from  the  lateral  pressure  to  which  the 
shell  has  been  subjected. 

The  carapace  is  oval  in  outline  with  the  l>orders  moderately  deflected, 
acute,  and  without  conspicuous  indentations,  except  that  it  is  slightly  notched 
in  the  position  of  the  nuchal  plate.  The  plastron  has  the  same  form  and 
degree  of  development  in  relation  with  the  carapace  as  in  living  species  of 
the  genus.     It  is  truncated  in  front,  and  notched  behind. 

Although  the  sutures  of  the  shell  are  conspicuously  visililc,  the  bones  or 
])lates  are  all  closely  united,  and  the  specimen  appears  to  have  been  nearly  or 
quite  in  theadult  condition.  No  lines  of  successive  growth  are  visible  on  the 
plates,  which  are  everywhere  smooth.  The  position  or  boundaries  of  the 
scutes  are  indicated  by  deeply  marked  grooves. 

Ten  vertebral  plates  appear  to  constitute  the  series,  the  connection  of  the 
last  two  in  the  specimen  being  destroyed.  In  form  and  proportians  they  bear 
a  near  likeness  to  those  in  '  emydes  in  general.  They  are  rather  wider  pro- 
portionately than  those  in  the  specimen  first  referred  to  E.  Stevemonianm, 
Init  otherwise  are  sufficiently  alike  to  pertain  to  the  same  species. 

As  usual,  the  first  vertebral  plate  is  longest;  then  follows  the  third.  The 
second,  fourth,  and  tilth  are  nearly  equal.  The  others,  to  the  eighth,  succes- 
sively diminish.  The  second  vertebral  plate  is  as  wide  at  its  fore  part  as  it 
is  long,  but  the  succeeding  two   plates   are   considerably   longer  than   wide. 


144 

The  fiflli  is  as  wide  as  it  is  long,  and  the  remaining  plates  are  considerably 
wider  than  long. 

The  costal  plates  have  about  the  same  form  as  in  recent  species  of  the 
genus,  but  the  first  one  is  of  greater  proportionate  breadth.  Besides  the 
nuchal  plate,  it  articulates  with  four  marginal  plates.  The  remaining  costal 
plates  are  of  nearly  uniform  width  as  in  recent  eraydes. 

The  second  costal  plate  articulates  with  the  fourth  and  fifth  marginals ; 
the  third,  with  the  fifth  and  the  anterior  angle  of  the  sixth  marginals ;  the 
fourth,  with  the  sixth  marginal  alone ;  the  fifth,  with  the  sixth  and  seventh 
marginals  ;  the  sixth,  with  the  seventh  and  eighth  marginals  ;  the  seventh,  witli 
the  eighth  to  the  tenth  marginals  inclusive,  and  the  eightli  with  nearly  the 
whole  of  the  tenth  and  tlie  angle  of  the  eleventh  marginals. 

The  marginal  plates  have  nearly  the  same  form  and  proportions  as  in  recent 
emydes. 

The  nuchal  plate  also  has  nearly  the  form  and  proportions  as  in  the  latter. 
The  pygal  plate,  likewise,  has  the  same  form,  but  is  proportionately  smaller. 

The  vertebral  scute-tracts  have  nearly  the  same  form  as  in  living  species  of 
Emys,  but  the  intervening  ones  are  longer  than  wide.  They  are  proportion- 
ately somewhat  narrower  than  in  the  specimen  first  referred  to  E.  Steven- 
sonianus. 

The  first  vertebral  scute  at  its  fore  part  extends  outwardly  nearly  to  the 
line  between  the  first  and  second  marginal  scutes,  and  in  this  position  is 
widest. 

The  last  vertebral  scute,  at  its  posterior  border,  crosses  the  last  vertebral 
plate  a  short  distance  back  of  the  middle.  In  recent  species  of  Emys  it 
impresses  the  pygal  plate. 

The  costal  scutes  resemble  those  of  ordinary  emydes,  and  as  in  these 
impress  the  marginal  plates  at  their  conjunction  with  the  corresponding  scutes. 

The  nuchal  scute  is  comparatively  short  and  wide.  The  specimen  being 
imperfect  at  the  back  part  prevents  us  from  ascertaining  positively  whether 
there  existed  a  pair  of  pygal  scutes  as  in  living  emydes,  but  an  apparent  curve 
upon  the  bone  renders  it  probable  that  two  also  belong  to  the  extinct  species. 

The  marginal  scutes  resemble  those  of  recent  emydes,  but  the  anterior  are 
wider  than  high,  and  the  posterior,  including  the  pygal  scutes,  are  higher 
than  wide. 

The  fore  part  of  the  plastron  has  a  half-oval  outline  shghtly  projecting,  and 


145 

fruiicated  at  the  extremity  as  in  ordinary  emydes.     The  back  part  likewise 
has  the  same  form  as  in  the  latter,  and  is  also  notched  at  the  extremity. 

The  pedicles  are  less  elevated  than  in  most  recent  emydes,  and  arc  rather 
wider  to  the  acute  border  of  the  carapace. 

The  constitution  of  the  plastron  is  so  nearly  like  that  of  ordinary  living 
emydes  as  hardly  to  need  special  description. 

The  entosternal  plate  is  nearly  lozenge-shaped,  and  is  widest  transversely. 

The  humeral  scutes  at  their  posterior  border  barely  cross  the  posterior 
extremity  of  the  entosternal  bone. 

The  pectoral  and  alxlominal  scutes  extend  outwardly  to  conjoin  the  margi- 
nal scutes  upon  the  marginal  bones.  In  ordinary  recent  species  of  Emys  the 
marginal  scutes  extend  upon  the  hyosternal  and  hyposternal  plates  to  join  the 
pectoral  and  abdominal  scutes. 

The  axillary  and  inguinal  scutes  are  large,  and  impress  each  a  marginal 
and  a  sternal  plate. 

The  length  of  the  carapace  in  a  curved  line  is  within  half  an  inch  of  a  foot 
and  a  quarter;  its  breadth,  in  the  same  manner,  11  inches;  in  a  straight  line 
it  is  little  over  a  foot  in  length  and  about  10  inches  in  breadth.  The  plastron 
is  less  than  a  foot  in  length,  and  its  pedicles  measure,  fore  and  aft,  4|  inches. 

5.  The  specimen  originally  referred  to  Emys  Haydeni  is  represented  in 
Fig.  6,  Plate  IX.  It  consists  of  a  portion  of  the  carapace  attached  to  a  mass 
of  indurated  clay,  and  was  obtained  near  Fort  Bridger,  Wyoming,  during  Pro- 
fessor Hayden's  exploration  of  1870.  Since  the  specimen  was  figured,  addi- 
tional portions  of  the  shell  have  been  found  which  allow  the  restoration  of 
the  fore  part  of  the  carapace.  It  belonged  to  a  larger  individual  than  the 
specimen  first  attributed  to  E.  Jeanesi,  and  from  the  appearance  of  the  mar- 
ginal border  of  several  of  the  costal  plates  to  a  less  mature  one. 

The  form  of  the  carapace  in  front  and  its  constitution  in  detail  are  very 
similar  to  the  corresponding  portion  in  the  former  specimen  attributed  to  E. 
Jeanesi.  The  proportions  of  the  vertebral  plates  is  more  nearly  as  in  the  lat- 
ter than  in  the  specimen  attributed  to  E.  Stevensonianus. 

An  apparently  important  difference  between  the  fossil  under  examination 
and  the  one.  attributed  to  E.  Jeanesi  is  the  less  uniformity  of  width  of  the 
intermediate  costal  plates.  These  alternately  become  wider  and  narrower 
toward  their  outer  extremities,  whereas  in  the  specimen  referred  to  E.  Jeanesi 
fliey  are  nearly  uniform. 
19  G 


146 

As  peculiarities  of  the  Ibssil,  tiie  fourth  vertebral  plate  is  octagonal,  and 
the  fifth  one  in  consequence  quadrate. 

The  second  and  third  vertebral  scute-tracts  are  much  longer  than  wide, 
and  proportionately  much  longer  than  in  the  former  specimens.  The  anterior 
division  of  the  second  vertebral  scute  forms  three  sides  of  a  square ;  and  the 
posterior  groove  defining  the  third  scute  crosses  the  sixth  vertebral  plate 
instead  of  the  fifth  as  in  the  other  specimens. 

The  peculiarities  indicated  in  the  fossil  under  examination  I  regard  as  being 
of  an  individual  character  and  in  some  degree  anomalous. 

A  fragment  of  the  fore  part  of  the  plastron  accompanying  the  specimen 
referred  to  E.  Haydeni,  and  apparently  belonging  to  the  same  individual, 
resembles  the  corresponding  part  in  the  specimens  previously  described,  but 
is  not  notched  at  its  anterior  truncated  border. 

6.  Another  specimen,  referable  to  Emys  wijomingensis,  consists  of  a  nearly 
complete  shell  except  the  posterior  third  of  the  carapace.  It  was  discovered 
by  Dr.  Carter  in  the  bluffs  of  the  Cottonwood,  seven  miles  from  Millei'sville, 
in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger,  Wyoming,  and  presented  by  him  to  the 
Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia.  It  is  occupied  in  the  interior 
with  a  greenish-gray  sandstone,  including  indurated  clay  pebbles.  In  form 
and  size  it  approaches  closely  the  specimen  first  referred  to  Emys  Jeanesi. 
In  the  forni  and  proportions  of  its  vertebral  scute  impressions  it  more  nearly 
resembles  the  specimen  originally  referred  to  E.  Haydeni.  The  intermediate 
ones  are,  however,  more  strongly  double  sigmoid  at  their  lateral  borders;  the 
fore  part  of  the  second  vertebral  scute  is  less  square;  and  the  anterior  border 
of  the  third  is  strongly  bowed  forwarxl  instead  of  being  nearly  straight. 

An  accidental  fracture  of  the  specimen  across  the  posterior  third  exposes 
to  view  the  lateral  supports  of  the  carapace  ascending  from  the  plastron. 
These  are  much  wider  than  in  any  of  the  living  emydes,  and  approach  in  their 
proportions  those  of  the  living  fresh-water  turtle  Batagur,  of  India. 

7.  A  seventh  specimen  oi  E.  wyomingensis  consists  of  an  intermediate  ])or- 
tion  of  a  carapace  and  nearly  the  whole  of  the  sternum.  It  was  obtained  by 
Dr.  Carter  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger,  and  presented  by  him  to  the 
Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia. 

The  vertebral  plates  of  the  carapace  are  in  general  of  proportionately  greater 
l:)readth  in  comparison  with  the  length  than  in  the  former  specimens,  and  in 
this  respect  most  nearly  approach  the  one  which  was  referred  to  E.  Hay- 


147 

deni.  The  vertebral  scute  impressions  likewise  most  nearly  resemble  those 
of  the  latter  but  are  proportionately  broader,  and  the  posterior  ]3order  of  the 
third  vertebral  scute  crosses,  as  usual,  the  fifth  vertebral  ])late. 

The  interior  of  the  carapaceal  specimen  being  freed  from  matrix,  exhibits 
the  costal  plates  with  strong,  well-developed  costal  capitula. 

The  plastron  is  flat ;  rather  more  strongly  notched  at  its  posterior  extremity 
than  in  the  former  specimens  in  which  it  is  preserved. 

The  thickness  of  the  costal  plates  ranges  from  2  to  4-i  lines.  The  thick- 
ness of  the  hyposternal  plates  internally  ranges  from  5^  to  8^  lines. 

8.  An  eighth  specimen,  consisting  of  the  greater  part  of  a  plastron  with 
fragments  of  the  carapace,  was  ol)tained  by  Dr.  Carter  near  Lodge-Pole  Trail, 
thirteen  miles  southeast  of  Fort  Bridger,  and  presented  to  the  Academy  of 
Natural  Sciences. 

y.  A  fragment  of  a  carapace,  from  Grizzly  Buttes,  presented  to  the  Acad- 
emy of  Natural  Sciences  l)y  Dr.  Joseph  K.  Corson,  United  States  Army, 
has  the  intermediate  scute  impressions  much  longer  than  the  width,  not  more 
so,  however,  proportionately,  than  in  the  nearly  complete  specimen  numbered 
as  the  sixth. 

10.  A  similar  fragment  of  an  apparently  young  specimen,  presented  Ijy 
Dr.  Carter,  has  the  second  vertebral  scute  impression  nearly  equal  in  length 
and  breadth ;  and  the  third  one  is  but  little  longer  than  the  breadth.  Their 
lateral  grooved  borders  are  strongly  double-sigmoid. 

11.  Part  of  a  carapace  and.  plastron  of  a  still  younger  specimen,  obtained 
]>y  Dr.  Carter  near  Lodge-Pole  Trail,  twelve  miles  southeast  of  Fort  Bridger, 
nearly  agrees  in  the  form  and  proportions  of  its  corresponding  vertebral  scute 
impressions  with  that  last  described.  The  second  is  nearly  of  equal  length 
and  breadth;  the  third  and  fourth  are  wider  than  the  length.  In  its  details 
of  structure  it  accords  sufficiently  with  the  older  and  more  complete  specimens 
to  render  it  probable  that  it  pertained  to  the  same  species,  except  that  the 
carapace  is  obtusely  cnrinated  its  entire  length.  The  entosternal  bone  is  more 
rounded  at  its  fore  part  than  in  previous  specimens,  and  its  length  is  alxtut 
equal  to  the  breadth. 

12.  A  fragment  of  a  plastron  of  another  young  individual,  from  the  same 
locality  and  gentleman  as  the  preceding,  nearly  agrees  with  the  corresponding 
part.  The  entosternal  is  a  httle  longer  than  liroad,  and  is  pyriform,  with  lat- 
eral projecting  angles. 


148 

13.  A  specimen,  apparently  of  a  still  younger  individual  of  the  same  species, 
presented  to  the  writer  by  Dr.  Carter,  was  about  the  size  of  the  palm  of  the 
hand.  It  consists  of  small  portions  of  the  carapace  and  more  than  half  the 
plastron.  The  carapace  is  carinated  as  in  specimen  No.  11,  and  otherwise 
agrees  with  this  in  its  details.  The  plastron  has  the  same  form  as  in  the 
more  complete  and  older  specimens  previously  indicated,  but  the  entosternal 
is  more  pyriform,  considerably  longer  than  wide,  and  the  posterior  defining 
groove  of  the  pectoral  scute  crosses  its  middle. 

If  it  is  admitted  that  the  specimens  Nos.  11  and  13  belong  to  Ejuijs 
wyomingensis,  it  would  appear  that  the  carinated  condition  of  the  carapace  is 
a  juvenile  character,  disappearing  with  growth.  It  would  also  appear  that 
during  growth  the  breadth  of  the  entosternal  plate  became  proportionately 
greater  in  relation  with  its  length 

None  of  the  specimens  viewed  as  young  ones  exhibit  upon  the  surface  lines 
of  growth,  except  the  sternal  one,  No.  12,  in  which  they  are  feebly  marked. 
A  distal  fragment  of  several  posterior  costal  plates  of  specimen  No.  11,  in  the 
immature  appearance  of  its  border,  clearly  proves  its  youthfulness. 

Besides  the  thirteen  characteristic  specimens  of  E.  loyomingemis  which 
have  been  described  or  mentioned,  fragments  of  many  others  are  contained 
in  the  collections  I  have  had  the  opportunity  of  examining.  From  their  com- 
parative frequency,  this  appears  to  have  been  the  most  abundant  of  the  fresh- 
water turtles  of  the  Bridger  Tertiary  epoch. 

14.  Since  writing  the  foregoing,  I  have  had  the  opportunity  of  examining 
another  specimen  of  Emys  wyomingensis  in  the  possession  of  Dr.  Ilirani 
Corson,  which  was  sent  to  him  from  Fort  Bridger  by  his  son,  Dr.  Joseph  K. 
Corson.  Tlie  specimen  consists  of  a  nearl}'  complete  shell  except  the  posterior 
fourth  of  the  carapace.  It  is  a  little  smaller  than  the  fourth-described  speci- 
men, represented  in  Plate  X,  and  is  crushed  and  distorted  nearly  in  a  similar 
manner. 

The  most  striking  peculiarities  of  this,  which  may  be  distinguished  as  the 
fourteenth  specimen,  are  the  unusual  depth  and  width  of  the  scutal  grooves 
of  the  carapace  and  the  proportionate  shortness  and  breadth  of  the  costal 
scute  areas. 

The  intermediate  vertebral  plates  to  the  first  and  fifth  are  absolutely  longer 
and  narrower  than  in  the  ratlier  larger  fourth-described  specimen.  The  costal 
plates  are  shorter,  and  (he  second  to  (he  four(h,  inclusive,  are  broader.     The 


149 

first  and  second  vertebral  scute  aieas  are  wider  and  the  third  one  lon<rer. 
The  forms  of  the  plates  and  scute  areas  indicated  are  nearly  the  same  in  both 
specimens. 

The  plastron  is  slightly  convex  in  both  directions,  and  its  extremities  for 
half  the  length  are  more  parallel  at  the  lateral  borders  than  in  the  fourth- 
described  specimen.  The  axillary  and  inguinal  scute  areas  are  longer  and 
narrower  than  in  the  latter,  and  somewhat  modified  in  form.  The  length  of 
the  plastron  in  the  median  line  is  11  inches.  Other  measurements  in  detail 
are  given  in  the  annexed  table  under  the  head  of  specimen  14. 

Comparative  measurements  of  the  specimens  referred  to  Emys  wyomingcn- 
sis  are  as  follows : 


loO 


!?»   o   C^   CI    no   •i'   !>.   '^  cn   1-H   o   CO   CO   OJ   o   ^    -r   '7>    -:■    -T 


OOSJOi-iOOO 


?  & 

S     3 


S  ""  .9 


2   fs   g 


t^       +3      fT-         = 


C5 

2  ■¥, 


C0Tl'O-^C0'*k0C^G^0».-i0000O 


ci«    o 


-     tjD    I     g 

c3   'rt   '^' 


.— .    =^ 


^     o     Oj 


a  .£-^ 


&    c3 


rt 


cs    u  *;;    & 


o 

,3 


M.g 


—  s^  a  o  G 
o  u  o  ^  o 
>j|  tq  ^  n  h:; 


■^45-5 


„   ..   a   ^ 
'c  5  2  o 

0       0"^       = 


' 

,_, 

00 

rS 

,^3 

Is 

'E. 

n 

+J 

P4 

n 

rt 

tc 

a 

^ 

m 

O 

-W 

o 

1-1 

o 

o 

> 

X 

n 

+3 

CO 

o    +f     :3     ©     o 
5   "t^   43   '^    "t^    "S 


-2     =3 


-w     cS-t:?     C^ee     c3^     Ph+?     rf     d7;__,— iT?     Pi 


CD     -5    ^     J 


0)    q:i   -kj   -*3 


r-     "^       t- 


■3.  -S 


s.  g, «  a  '^  Z 


-        +3      (+H       =*-!       ^       r— 


.■"  =„  *;  V.  «  <„  « 


a  Hi 


■a  -a 


5     M 


o 
-a  J  J 
^  ^  ^  ^  £  •S 


^^^ 


ft  ., 
!D  O 
ft    P^ 


n       -p     f^      +^      r— 


^   IS 

-fS     r— 

to   ^ 


•■*-     o    '^ 


a    oj 


fl      O      Q      O)      ^ 


a     aj 


SO 

a 


J  pq  i_]  H  H^  M 


151 


1^ 

^ 

O    Ci    tc 

re 

c* 

i^ 

i- 

'7( 

,_3 

Cl 

-T 

'^ 

GO 

x? 

O 

-O     (^ 

-r 

i 

C^     est     CC     ^ 

.-H      -?•      .— 1      t-l 

Oi 

0»            rt 

CO     -f     CO     -:J1     f^J     CO 

r-i 

^ 

S 

■^                   ~kl     ^,7 

cd 

o   o>   W   Ci 

-^ 

O 

XI   :o   i^ 

O     t^     CO     O     O     1-^ 

^ 

^     r-     ^ 

g 

H- 

1      r-*Tl      r^;^ 

o» 

r> 

O    t^    X 

rH 

'J 

2 

r+ 

•    -*• 

lO    CO     lO    CD 

X 

t> 

C5    Ci    OC 

o 

C^    CQ    t^    c 

\o 

I-i 

I    X) 

.— < 

1-H    ,-.    i;^    ^ 

r-t 

c^ 

•     iH 

i-j 

p 

^ 

u 

c 

ot 

1-t 

^ 

T— 1 

?= 

05 

>^ 

r-H 

?» 

•^ 

o    ^    rr 

Oi 

(?>    CO    o 

cd 

s 

^ 

o 

7-i    ^    y-^ 

G^ 

■rl'     -^     CO        ' 

K 

(U 

•^    O 

T— 

QO    C*    X 

o 

-rt 

o  T-«  L-: 

t^    c^i    CX)    -^    l^    Ol 

i> 

M 

(N   ■« 

^    ^    ^ 

<M 

(M 

OJ    rt    ^ 

G^     TT    CO     TT     OJ     CN 

?? 

«    uO    C- 

X 

!^ 

i>.      -t 

Xi    -^    t- 

■o   L-: 

1^   t^ 

-P 

* 

1-5  t^  L-: 

^    — <    .-1    Ci    O     Ci 

^ 

7^     ^■^     T" 

CJ 

T 

^      -:J 

T-(        1— (        1— 

OJ    C*    w    ^ 

CO    -g*   -^   CO   o<   oi 

ID 

^ 

SO 

; 

. 

?j 

o   u'^   o  e 

c 

XI    c 

t^    '»    c- 

OJ 

•    ^ 

lO 

•-^ 

o*   r^  -^   c^ 

IT 

^   ^   o 

OJ 

;  ^ 

2= 

-tri    -+r. 

O) 

fN    T-l    ry    ir 

c 

•^ 

-^  o 

T     -rr     t^ 

t^  o 

f»   en 

35 

-3'    OO    .-1    OC 
M    T-1    (N    ., 

O    O    CO    CO 

—    00    Ci    CO    X)    o 

'^ 

3 

IN  CO   rr  (H 

Tt 

1-H 

1-1   \r. 

r-l     »H 

(?J 

CO     1-1     ^ 

CO    -^    CO    -^    Ol    CO 

CO 

,_ 

'O    CO    o 

o 

•^J   i-«   r-l 

CO 

^ 

2= 

u 

O     C^)    '-T 

i^ 

O 

OJ 

^ 

Q 

Ci,w    — 

Qi 

:o 

* 

o    0»    ^ 

^     r-^     -H 

"■ 

-5 

>      tj 

i     c 

1 

CO 

o 

c 

■£ 

d 

> 

> 

c 

> 

C 
a. 

1 

c 

o    "^ 

5  -2 

c5    ^ 

3    "^ 

ai    a 
^    c 

'3  ,Z 

a 

-S 

p 

CO 

o 

a 
S 
c 

C3 

O 
4J 

1 

;-< 
.2 
Z 
■J. 
o 

c 

s 

O 

-^  r2 
o    p 

-^  .2 

=    a 
5  <* 

^^ 

3  -1 

o 

a; 

a 

- 

■   5  "    c 

:3     -a     o 

o 

o 
o 

D 

1 

c 

1  3 

S'3 

il   rt  .2 
§  1   ^ 

"11 

0  '1 1 

cs     i 

3      C3 

^  a 

T 

i 

■3 

'/ 

"St 

•S  To  §    a 
0  '^^  ^  To  1 

i   =   ^   a 

-S  J  .a  3 
fo-:.^^   g 

°  s 

§  1 

1  § 
1  = 

o    a    r 

rt      r^         ^       r-^       p^       ^ 

^  r^  Is    '=3    7i    "cS 

^  2  S  S  g  s 
g  g  s  -  J  - 

-^    5S    ®    2  'a  -d 

o  fj  .;::  w  a,  .& 
^  r  -3  f  M  '^ 

,             •*-"       r,       **-      ,            ^ 

£ 

=3    o  «-    o 

o 

c 

=  'S 

o    o   ^ 

=  = 

°  ^ 

o 

^   °  =S   = 

o  •g    o 

=3  °  o  °  'S  ° 

M 

,a  'S  j3  :: 

3  J 

—  J  _^ 

J  _- 

+j    — 

— 

3^35 

0  3 

3^3 

3  3^5^3 

to  1   to  1 

t 

D  1 

1  ¥ 

ol    rt   "t 

5n    "S 

^1  ¥. 

)^ 

y'i  s."« 

a     t 

l"!     Mrt 

to  "i"  to  1    to  "3 

S 

c    "    =    ? 

c 

§    a 

oj    ld    a 

o    s 

ej    « 

0) 

a    o    a    D 

p   a   « 

a    o    a    a)    a    o 

3 
J 

P3 

K 

h5 

n 

H 

o 
hJ 

« 

^ 

E-i 

^ 

Fh 

m 

^ 

3 

« 

152 


C't    CO    -*    tTJ    O    'M 


CO     Tj"     CO     Oi     CO     (>» 


O    O    i-    Cl 


02 


>j  :r: 


J5    J=^        •      O    J=    1-^    ZH 

:::  ^  '^  ^  ,^  ri  ■:^    a 


t^  ^ 


O      M      U     "t*      ® 


®     ^ 


a  a 


'^  '^ 


O  to 

CO  ^_| 

^  O 

(-1  O) 

o  > 


3  "^ 


-3 
1   3 

4-a      -4-3 


p3     s-i     oj     M 


t», 

t^ 

n 

a 

<i> 

a 

a; 

4) 

M 

S 

M 

« 

K 

a> 

^ 

I  f « 


fcC 

a 


►J  «  ^J  cq  k1  cq 


o  ^  o  's    o 

o  o 

^J      ^  +3  rQ       ^J 

— -     -t-i  (-5  -t-s     I— ) 

to  ^  to  ^ 


3 


!  g   k 

<g     o 
a    CD 


■*-     3      cc     aj 


Sw 


cc     o 

£  S 

q    0) 


to  M 

o  o 

o  « 

-a  -a 

a  a 

o  o 

o  o 


S    «!  ^  -3  -S    « 


a  ■ 
'So 


^    o   ^    o   ^ 


M        U;        M        V        i-l        t^        b-i 

M  kJ  cq  v^  fq  h:]  H 


leg 

a     ai 


^  ,a  TD  jq 

■     ■"       ■    -*J 

a 


o 


60    t" 

^    a 

g  a 


to 

a 

,:a 


5  J 

■^    1?n  '^ 

«    a    Q^ 


J  ■S  ^ 


i-lpqnqcqi-lPi-^pqHlcq 


a    0) 


1-^  Kl 


153 


^ 

CO    O*    Ci    "^     T 

1    •*   c^    ift    (T 

T 

C" 

-f    o 

o   ^ 

-r 

%> 

1— 1    .— (    1- 

^    ^    -^    CO    ^n'    C^    0" 

i-t    c 

rH     f-H 

•-H      T-H 

1— t 

M 

?? 

-*t 

-K* 

r+4 

ro 

QJ 

tOOmCTCiOCiiOOCTJOC 

Si 

1— 

1- 

^     r-t     1-1              rH 

►5 

s 

"b'    H:* 

oi 

o  t--  o  o  r: 

-2 

^         ^   ^   ^ 

1^ 

S 

O    CO    3    l>.    (N 

vn 

CI 

f-H 

•2 

T-H 

i-<    .-1 

1— I 

H 

'a 

d 

1— 1 

^ 

^ 

=u 

Ci 

S3 

S 

t>.    CC    -rt 

O 

-i^    L'- 

W       ^ 

to 

00 

?! 

rH    .— 1    I- 

C 

c* 

CO    -n 

CO    c- 

•>* 

H 

??' 

Hci 

o   CO   tr 

o- 

<^>   :r 

O)    -t 

t-   -; 

CO     -f 

t^ 

o 

CJ     '^ 

n    -3 

(M    C- 

'-'    ot 

^ 

(» 

O    CO    oc 

GC 

^     OJ 

i^  '^ 

-H    ,- 

00     ^5 

O     OJ 

O      O 

o 

.— 1    1— 1    1- 

& 

(M    '■3 

CO    "3 

tM    c^ 

r-H     OT     ,-( 

1—1 

o 

^ 

00 

^ 

T-H        IC 

o 

^-5 

(?J      ,-H 

?? 

■O 

Oi    CO    C" 

c 

CO    O" 

O    C" 

00     r- 

<D     t- 

O      W 

'^      '^ 

Tf 

►5 

1— <    I— 1   1— 

f 

w  "^ 

CO   -a 

(N     r- 

■-I    OJ 

i 

•5 

as   CO   I'. 

i^ 

CO 

i-H     -- 

o 

^ 

?= 

^ 

»^ 

(^ 

-n* 

'X 

ci 

►3 

fH 

c^ 

a 

§ 

00    -^ 

T— 1 

>^ 

a 
2 

GO 

0. 

t- 

t^ 

0, 

_£3 

U 

'    ^ 

c 

c 

p. 

O 

c 

>,  13 

.a 

o 

,3 

> 

c 

'3  ;^ 

"=3  s 

S  s 

i?  c 
1'£ 

> 

■i    c 

'5 

o 
tn 

o 

CO 

<^ 
O 

a 

a 

gular  scutes  at  inner 
gular  scutes  in  front 
humeral  scutes  iuteri 

CS 

o: 

a 

": 
c 

cfi 

.a 

i  S 

=  1 

^1= 

g  ^ 

11 
1  ° 

.9  -« 

i| 

1  2 

o    o 

a  a 

"3    a, 
S    c 
^^ 

§  z 

CO     a: 

c 

en 

CO 

'Pi 

1  i 

GO      r- 

.2    a 
1.3 

•3   °  =5 

o 

"s  ■= 

o    o 

o     '^ 

Z  ^ 

S 

3  -  -3 

-: 

_  J 

.a  5 

-S  -f 

r=       - 

^  :3 

-a  :3 

c; 

«■! 

«i 

0) 

s 

to  ^5  t 

0  S 

M    s 

to  ;5 

tc  S 

to  :i 

a    o    a 

i 

a   g 

a    g 

a    g 

a    V 

a    o 

a    § 

«      ^.      (D 

Q     ;.! 

0^      t- 

O      [-. 

O         fcH 

«    ^ 

hj 

n 

t^ 

H 

I-) 

« 

h^ 

n 

.»-5 

pq 

1-3 

M 

h-3 

M 

Hi  ;^ 

^ 

"*<» 

^ 


o 
o 


feq  li 


-a 

•  ^^ 

w 

t^ 

OJ 

Li^ 

i^ 

!-i 

M 

U 

O 

t/J 

OJ 

n3 

05 


CO       -t= 


s? 

n 

^1 

8 

2 

« 

C^ 

f-* 

^ 

01 

s 

^< 

.j-i 

t*^ 

fli 

o 

r^ 

H 

n) 

kK 

•f<> 

<u 

JW 

>. 

5^ 

tq 


o 

3 

c-i 

lO 

.^ 

o 

lC 

t^; 

:zi 


05 

^ 
^ 

^ 

05 

fcq 

r/J 

o 

n) 

-* 

^ 


20  G 


154 

BAPTEMYS. 

A  peculiar  iiud  interesting  genus  of  extinct  emydiform  turtles,  apparently 
intermediate  in  its  characters  to  the  existing  American  genera  Dermatemys 
and  Staurotypus,  is  founded  on  remains  in  the  Bridger  Tertiary  formation  of 
Wyoming. 

In  shape  and  constitution,  the  shell  of  Baptemys  (Plate  XII)  approaches 
most  nearly  that  of  Dermatemys^  more  especially  the  carapace,  while  the 
sternum  partakes  of  the  character  of  that  of  Staurotypus. 

The  carapace  is  oval  in  outline,  apparently  not  wider  behind  than  in  front, 
and  with  the  prominence  or  convexity  about  equal  to  half  its  breadth.  The 
convexity  is  nearly  uniform  fore  and  aft,  and  laterally  to  the  flexure  of  the 
marginal  plates.  The  anterior  border  is  bai'ely  evei'ted  and  is  thick  and 
rounded.  The  imperfection  of  the  fossils  prevents  a  determination  whether 
the  posterior  border  departed  from  the  general  convexity  of  the  liack  of  the 
shell.  The  surface  formed  hy  the  first  and  second  marginal  plates  is  feebly 
depressed. 

A  median  carina  or  thick  rounded  ridge  starts  upon  the  sixth  vertebral 
plate  and  extends  backward. 

Eleven  vertebral  plates  enter  into  the  constitution  of  the  carapace.  Those 
anteriorly  are  proportionately  much  longer  than  in  emydes.  They  also  appear 
proportionately  of  greater  extent  than  in  Dermatemys. 

The  first  vertebral  plate  is  oblong,  somewhat  narrowed  behind,  and  with 
the  sides  convex.  Those  to  the  sixth  inclusive  are  hexagonal  coffin-shaped. 
From  the  fifth  they  rapidly  decrease  in  length  to  the  eighth  inclusive,  and 
then  increase  again  to  the  last.  The  seventh  is  niore  uniformly  hexagonal 
than  the  others.  The  ninth  is  quadrate  and  wider  than  long.  The  tenth  is 
quadrate,  widest  behind,  with  the  lateral  borders  convex  and  the  back  border 
concave. 

Tlie  costal  plates  arc  like  those  of  Dermatemys,  and  as  in  this  widen  out- 
■  wardly  more  than  in  ordinary  emydes  in  accordance  with  the  greater  convexity 
of  the  carapace. 

Tlie  nuchal  plate  and  marginal  bones,  so  far  as  preserved,  appear  to  be 
nearly  as  in  Dermatemys. 

The  scute  impressions  of  the  carapace,  as  in  the  latter,  are  not  defined  by 
such  deep  grooves  as  are  usually  observed  in  emydes. 


156 

The  vertebral  scute  impressions  have  the  same  fonu  niid  general  [iropor- 
tions  as  in  Dermatemys.  The  first  is  wide,  urn-like  in  outline,  and  is  broader 
than  long.  The  succeeding  three  are  quadrate,  with  tlie  length  greatly  ex- 
ceeding the  breadth,  and  with  the  usual  lateral  brace-like  or  double-sigmoid 
borders.  The  last  impression  narrows  for  a  short  distance  and  then  diverges 
in  the  usual  manner. 

The  costal  scute  impressions  resemble  those  of  emydes  and  extend  farther 
upon  the  marginal  bones  than  in  Dermatemys,  nearly  reaching  the  middle  of 
their  outer  face  at  the  sides  of  the  carapace,  as  far  back  as  they  are  preserved 
in  the  fossils,  as  well  as  in  front. 

The  position  of  the  nuchal  scute  is  not  preserved  in  the  fossils,  but  the 
part  immediately  contiguous  in  one  of  them  indicates  tliat  it  had  about  the 
same  proportions  as  in  Dermatemys. 

The  marginal  scute  impressions  about  occupied  the  lower  two-thirds  of 
the  outer  aspect  of  the  marginal  plates.  The  line  intervening  to  the  first 
two  marginal  scutes  is  continuous  with  that  between  the  first  vertebral  and 
the  succeeding  costal  scute.  ' 

Considering  the  striking  resemblance  of  the  carapace  of  Baptemys  to  that 
of  Dermatemys,  it  is  not  a  little  surprising  to  observe  so  much  ditference  in 
the  plastron,  though  this  also  is  nearly  alike  in  the  scute  impressions. 

Compared  with  that  of  Dermatemys,  the  plastron  is  remarkably  small, 
leaving  proportionately  much  larger  spaces  in  advance  and  behind  the  bridges 
for  the  movements  of  the  animal.  As  before  intimated,  it  is  intermediate  in 
character  to  that  of  the  last-named  genus  and  that  of  Staurotypus.  The 
pedicles  are  intermediate  in  extent  to  what  they  are  in  the  two  genera  just 
mentioned.  The  fore  part  of  the  plastron  has  nearly  the  same  shape  as  in 
Dermatemys,  but  is  widely  emarginate  at  the  extremity,  and  it  is  thick 
and  rounded  at  the  border  instead  of  being  acute  as  usual  in  emydes.  The 
back  part  of  the  plastron  is  narrower  than  in  Dermatemys,  but  less  so  than 
in  Staurotypus.  It  terminates  in  a  rounded  extremity  as  seen  in  Fig.  2, 
Plate  XII.  In  Dermatemys,  it  ends  in  a  wide  notch ;  in  Staurotypus,  in  a 
point. 

The  entosternal  lione  is  proportionately  as  large  as  in  Dermatemys,  and  has 
nearly  the  same  form.  "  The  same  may  be  said  to  be  the  case  w'ith  the  epister- 
iials,  (Fig.  6,  Plate  XV,)  except  that  their  anterior  border  is  more  conca,ve. 


156 

Tlie  liyostcrnals  and  hyposlcrnals  have  nearly  the  same  extent.  Their 
intervening  suture  crosses  the  sternum  near  the  middle  of  the  pedicles. 

Dr.  Gra}-,  who  established  the  genus  Dermatemys,  represents  the  South 
American  species  D.  Mawii,  with  a  pair  of  gular  scutes.  D.  Berardii,  of 
Mexico,  is  represented  by  Dumeril  as  possessing  a  single  symmetrical  gular 
scute,  and  this  also  is  the  case  in  two  shells  from  Balize  River,  Yucatan,  and 
Tabasco,  Mexico,  described  by  Professor  Cope  as  pertaining  to  another  species 
whicli  he  has  named  D.  ahnormis. 

In  Baptemys  there  is  no  trace  of  separation  of  gular  scutes  from  the 
humeral  scutes  as  indicated  in  Fig.  6,  Plate  XV.  The  grooves  defining  the 
latter  from,  the  pectoral  scutes  occupy  nearly  the  same  position  as  in  Derma- 
temys, crossing  nearly  through  the  middle  of  the  entosternal  plate. 

In  Emys  the  gular  and  humeral  scutes  fold  deeply  upon  the  upper  surface 
of  the  sternum,  but  in  Baptemys,  as  is  also  the  case  in  Dermatemys,  the  cor- 
responding scutes  fold  only  to  the  upper  edge  of  the  rounded  border  of  the 
sternum. 

The  intervening  grooves  of  the  pectoral,  abdominal,  femoral,  and  caudal 
scutes  nearly  equally  subdivide  the  sternum  of  Baptemys. 

The  pectoral  and  abdominal  scutes  extend  upon  the  sternal  jjedicles,  and 
are  there  separated  from  the  marginal  scutes  by  large  intervening  scutes,  as 
in  the  sea-turtles  and  in  Dermatemys.  In  the  same  position  in  Dermatemys 
ahnormis  there  are  four  of  these  scutes.  In  one  of  the  specimens  I  have  had 
the  opportunity  of  seeing  there  are  four  of  these  scutes  on  one  side  and  three 
on  the  other;  but  in  this  case  it  appears  evident  that  the  reduction  is  not  the 
usual  condition  in  the  species. 

There  are  three  scutes  on  the  sternal  bridge  of  Baptemys  which  succes- 
sively increase  in  size.  The  first  or  axillary  scute  joins  the  fourth  and  fifth 
marginal  scutes  and  the  pectoral  scute.  The  middle  or  submarginal  scute 
is  hexagonal,  widest  transversely,  and  it  joins  the  fifth  and  sixth  marginal 
scutes  and  the  pectoral  and  abdominal  scutes.  The  third  or  inguinal  scute, 
nearly  twice  the  extent  of  that  in  advance,  is  also  hexagonal.  It  extends 
across  the  hyposternal  upon  the  hyosternal  plate,  and  joins  the  sixth  and 
seventh  marginal  scutes  and  the  abdominal  scute,  an  outward  prolongation 
of  which  to  the  inguinal  notch  separates  it  from  the  femoral  scute. 

The  axillary  fossa  reaches  as  far  back  as  the  posterior  third  of  the  fourth 


167 

marginal  bone ;  the  inguinal  fossi  extends  forward  nearly  on  a  line  witli  the 
posterior  border  of  the  sixth  marginal  bone. 

The  interior  of  the  fossils  being  occupied  by  the  rocky  matrix,  all  the 
internal  anatomical  details  are  concealed  from  view. 

Baptemys  in  the  relatively  smaller  size  of  the  plastron  to  the  carapace,  and 
in  the  presence  of  submarginal  scutes  to  the  sternal  bridges,  is  more  nearly 
related  to  the  marine  turtles  than  the  genus  Emys. 

Baptemys  appears  also  to  have  been  nearly  related  with  the  equally  ancient 
and  extinct  genus  Pleurosternon,  of  the  English  Tertiary  formation.  In 
this  the  vertebral  scute  areas  of  the  carapace  are  remarkable  for  their  breadth, 
which  considerably  exceeds  the  length,  whereas  in  Baptemys  the  intermediate 
Vertebral  scute  areas  are  much  longer  than  liroad.  The  plastron  in  Pleuro- 
sternon is  intermediate  in  its  proportions  to  that  of  Emys  and  Baptemys,  and 
has  an  additional  pair  of  bones  entering  into  its  composition  which  do  not 
exist  in  the  latter  genera.  In  Pleurosternon  a  pair  of  integular  scutes  inter- 
vene to  the  gular  scutes ;  in  Baptemys  there  appears  to  be  no  distinction  of 
gular  scutes  from  humeral  scutes.  In  Pleurosternon,  as  in  Baptemys,  large 
accessory  or  submarginal  scutes  intervene  to  the  comparatively  large  axillary 
and  inojuinal  scutes. 


o^ 


Baptemys  wyomingensis. 

The  species  thus  named,  as  well  as  the  genus,  was  first  characterized  from 
a  beautiful  specimen  of  the  turtle-shell,  discovered  by  Mr.  0.  C  Smith,  of 
Leverett,  Massachusetts,  while  engaged  in  the  service  of  the  Union  Pacitic 
Railroad  Company,  near  Fort  Bridger,  Wyoming  Territory.  The  specimen 
was  loaned  to  Professor  Hayden,  by  whom  it  was  sent  to  the  writer  for  exam- 
ination.    It  is  represented  in  Plate  XII,  one-third  the  natural  size. 

The  specimen  consists  of  a  shell  which  nearly  retains  its  original  form,  but 
has  lost  the  front  marginal  plates  on  one  side,  all  those  behind,  most  of  those 
of  the  left,  and  the  front  part  of  the  plastron.  It  is  black,  as  is  frequently 
the  case  with  the  fossils  from  the  same  locality ;  and  it  is  filled  in  the  in- 
terior with  a  gray  sandstone  mingled  wath  coarse  pebbles  of  indurated  bluisii 
clay. 

In  its  perfect  condition  the  shell  has  measured  about  a  foot -and  a  half  in 
length,  and  in  breadth  about  a  foot.     Following  the  curvature  of  the  carapace 


158 

fore  and  aft,  it  has  measured  about  20  inches  in  length,  and  the  transverse 
arch  from  a  level  has  been  nearly  as  great. 

The  length  of  the  plastron  has  been  about  11^  inches;  its  breadth  from 
its  sutural  junction  with  the  carapace  is  9  inches. 

The  sides  of  the  plastron  slope  inwardly  to  a  moderate  degree.  The  pedi- 
cles are  nearly  on  a  level  with  the  rest  of  the  plastron,  but  are  somewhat 
prominent  in  front  and  slope  backward,  and  are  concave  approaching  the 
inguinal  fossaj.  The  rise  of  the  shell  appears  mainly  to  commence  in  the 
marginal  bones  from  the  sternal  pedicles  ;  to  what  degree  is  uncertain,  as 
this  part  of  the  fossil  is  somewhat  crushed  inwardly.  The  rise  is  greater 
anteriorly,  and  gradually  appears  to  subside  liehind. 

The  fore  and  aft  extent  of  the  pedicles  is  4^  inches.  The  length  of  the 
anterior  extension  of  the  plastron  has  been  about  3J  inches ;  its  breadth  at 
the  bottom  of  the  axillary  fossse  is  5J  inches.  The  length  of  the  posterior 
extension  of  the  plastron  is  a  little  more  than  3^-  inches,  and  its  width  at  the 
bottom  of  the  inguinal  fossae  nearly  4^  inches. 

The  marginal  bones  appear  more  abruptly  bent  to  join  the  sternal  bridge 
than  in  Dermatemys,  but  the  difference  is  partially  due  to  the  crushing 
inward  of  the  under  part  of  the  shell  in  the  fossil. 

A  second  specimen  of  the  shell  of  Baptemys  wyomingensis  was  subse- 
quently discovered  during' Professor  Hayden's  exploration  of  1870  at  Church 
Buttes,  Wyoming.  The  shell  is  of  a  different  color,  and  is  filled  with  and 
partially  imbedded  in  a  different  matrix  from  the  former  specimen.  The 
bones  are  brown,  and  the  matrix  consists  of  a  very  hard  sandstone.  The 
specimen,  though  fiir  less  complete  than  the  former,  fortunately  retains  one- 
half  of  the  anterior  part  of  the  plastron.  Most  of  the  carapace  is  lost  or 
imbedded  in  the  hard  rock.  The  sternum  on  one  side  from  its  fore  extremity 
to  the  commencement  of  the  xiphisternal  bone,  together  with  the  pedicle  and 
its  characteristic  scute  impressions,  is  well  preserved. 

The  measurements  of  this  second  specimen  indicate  an  individual  of  the 
same  size  as  the  former.  Slight  differences  existing  between  corresponding 
parts  of  the  two  appear  to  be  variations  only  of  an  individual  character.  In 
the  second  specimen  tlie  large  inguinal  scute  passes  just  over  the  back  edge 
of  the  hyosternal  plate,  while  in  the  former  one  it  extends  upon  it  for  half 
an  inch. 


159 


Measurements  derived  mainly  from  the  more  complete  specimen  arc  as 

follows. 


Length. 


First  vertebral  plate . . . 
Second  vertebral  plate. 
Third  vertebral  plate  . . 
Fourth  vertebral  plate. 
Fifth  vertebral  plate . . . 
Sixth  vertebral  plate  . 
Seventh  vertebral  plate 
Eighth  vertebral  plate . 
Ninth  vertebral  plate  . 
Tenth  vertebral  plate. . 


Lines. 
27 
22 
23 
22 
32 
17 
10 
7 
9 
13 


Breadth. 


Linen. 
]3 
14 
14 
.  14 
15 
IG 
17 
12 
14 
16 


Leuffth. 


Width 
iuterually. 


Width 
externally. 


F'irst  costal  plate  . . 
Second  costal  plate 
Third  costal  plate. . 
Fourth  costal  plate . 
Fifth  costal  plate  . 
Sixth  costal  plate  . 
Seventh  costal  plate 


Lines. 

45 
GO 
70 
73 
GO 
GO 
47 


Lines. 

2G 
24 
24 
22 
20 
17 
15 


Lines. 
37 
2G 
27 
24 
30 
22 
20 


The  nuchal  plate  fore  and  aft  has  been  about  2f  inches ;  its  breadth  about 
an  inch  greater. 

The  marginal  bones,  so  far  as  preserved,  appear  to  have  nearly  the  propor- 
tions and  aspects  as  in  Dermatemys.  Their  vertical  measurement  is  about 
2  inches,  and  their  width  about  the  same. 

The  measurements  of  the  scute  impressions  are  as  follows: 


lireadth. 


First  vertebral  scute  impression  . . 
Second  vertebral  scute  impression 
Third  vertebral  scute  impression . . 
Fourth  vertebral  scute  impression 

First  costal  scute  at  middle 

Second  costal  scute  at  middle 

Third  costal  scute  at  middle 


Lines. 

52 
30 
33 
32 
5G 
4G 
4G 


160 

The  episternals  at  their  uiiier  border  measure  1  inch  ia  length ;  at  their 
posterior  extremity  10  lines. 

The  entosternal  bone  is  2J  inches  fore  and  aft,  and  2f  inches  wide. 

In  the  better  preserved  of  the  two  specimens  the  plastron  presents  the 
irregularity  of  having  the  left  hyposternal  and  xiphisternal  near  half  an  inch 
more  produced  forward  than  npon  the  right  side,  as  seen  in  Fig.  2,  Plate  XII. 

Measurements  of  the  remaining  sternal  bones  are  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Length  of  right  hyosterual  internally 30 

Length  of  left  hyosterual  internally 25 

BreadtJi  of  hyosternals  at  middle 58 

Length  of  hyposternals  internally 34 

Breadth  of  hyposternals  at  middle 52 

Length  of  right  xiphisternal  internally 34 

Length  of  left  xiphisternal  internally 40 

Breadth  of  anterior  border 24 

Measurements  of  the  scutes  are  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Length  of  gular-humeral  scute  internally 28 

Breadth  of  gular-humeral  scute  posteriorly 26 

Length  of  pectoral  scute  internally 18 

Breadth  of  pectoral  scute  posteriorly 36 

Length  of  abdominal  scute  internally 29 

Breadth  of  abdominal  scute  posteriorly 28 

Length  of  femoral  scute  internally 26 

Breadth  of  femoral  scute  posteriorly 22 

Length  of  caudal  scute  internally 27 

Axillary  scute  obliquely  from  within  outward 32 

Axillary  scute  at  posterior  border 13 

Middle  scute  of  sternal  bridge  fore  and  aft 17 

Middle  scute  of  sternal  bridge  at  middle,  transversely 25 

Inguinal  scute  fore  and  aft 32 

Inguinal  scute  at  anterior  border 13 

Inguinal  scute  at  middle  between  prominent  angles ,   29 

BAENA. 

By  this  name  I  have  distinguished  a  remarkable  genus  of  turtles,  indicated 
by  remains  in  the  Bridger  Tertiary  beds.  It  partook  of  characters  of  the 
snappers  or  chelydroids,  the  terrapins  or  emydoids,  and  the  sea-turtles  or 
chelonioids.  The  specimens  upon  which  the  genus  is  founded  consist  of  shells, 
which  are  mostly  so  much  crushed  and  distorted  as  to  render  it  somewhat 
uncertain  as  to  their  exact  original  and  perfect  form.  They  were  apparently 
about  as  prominent  as  in  our  snapper,  and  had  nearly  the  same  outline  of  shape. 
Tlie  middle  of  the  carapace  is  not  depressed  as  in  the  latter,  but  is  somewhat 


161 

flattened,  and  forms  a  continuous  convexity  with  tlic  sides.  The  posterior 
extremity  presents  a  deep  emargination  as  in  the  snapper,  and  on  each  side  is 
notched  likewise  as  in  the  latter. 

The  plastron  of  Baena  is  emydoid  in  character,  and  in  its  degree  of  develop- 
ment in  relation  with  the  carapace  approaches  that  of  its  associate  genus  Bap- 
temys.  As  in  this,  large  spaces  exist  between  the  extremities  of  the  plastron 
and  carapace,  but  comparatively  of  much  less  extent  than  in  Chelydra.  The 
pedicles  of  the  plastron  are  immovably  conjoined  with  the  carapace.  They 
are  as  wide  relatively  as  in  the  emydoids,  but  are  much  longer.  The  two 
extremities  of  the  plastron  are  nearly  alike  in  shape,  being  tongue-like  and 
feebly  emarginate  at  the  end. 

The  number,  arrangement,  and  general  form  of  the  corneous  scutes  of  the 
carapace  appear  to  have  been  the  same  as  in  Emys  and  Chelydra.  The  plastron 
exhibits  two  pairs  of  gular  scute  areas,  which,  together  with  the  other  scute 
areas,  made  seven  pairs  to  the  plastron.  In  addition  to  these  the  pedicles 
exhibit  a  row  of  scute  areas  between  the  former  and  the  marginal  scute  areas 
of  the  carapace,  as  in  the  sea-turtle,  the  snapper,  Dermatemys,  and  Baptemys. 

A  feature  which  may  be  regarded  as  a  character  of  Baena  is  the  obliteration 
•  of  the  sutures,  and  the  shell  at  maturity  has  the  bones  so  co-ossitied  that  their 
original  boundaries  cannot  be  traced. 

The  true  ribs  or  costal  arclies,  connate  with  the  costal  plates,  are  remark- 
ably prominent  in  Baena,  and  the  costal  capitula  are  well  developed.  In 
several  specimens,  in  which  portions  of  the  carapace. arc  broken  away,  the 
mass  of  rock  within  exhibits  deep  concave  grooves  indicating  the  former 
position  of  the  rib-arches. 

The  sustaining  columns  of  the  carapace,  springing  as  processes  from  the 
hyosternal  and  hyposternal  bones  of  the  plastron,  are  of  great  comparative 
breadth,  and  subdivide  the  interior  of  the  shell  into  three  compartments  as  in 
tlie  Batagur,  a  genus  of  fresh-water  turtles  now  living  in  India. 

Baena  arenosa. 

The  species  thus  named  was  originally  founded  on  a  specimen  consisting 
of  a  nearly  complete  turtle-shell  discovered  at  the  junction  of  the  Big  Sandy 
and  Green  Rivers,  Wyoming,  during  Professor  Hayden's  exploration  of  187U. 
The  specimen  is  represented  in  Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  XIII. 

The  shell,  besides  appearing  to  be  in  some  degree  crushed  downward  or 
21  G 


1G2 

flattened,  has  lost  the  fore  part  and  right  border  of  the  carapace.     The  plas- 
tron, less  injured,  has  lost  its  anterior  extremity. 

The  outline  of  the  carapace  appears  to  have  been  broadly  oval;  and  the 
shell  was  apparently  not  more  elevated  than  in  our  common  snapper. 

All  the  bones  of  the  carapace  and  plastron  are  so  intimately  co-ossified  that 
the  position  of  the  former  sutures  cannot  be  detected.  The  grooved  bound- 
aries of  the  scutal  areas  are,  on  the  other  hand,  vv^ell  marked. 

The  carapace  corresponding  with  the  position  of  the  intermediate  vertebral 
scutes  is  flattened  and  slightly  depressed  at  the  middle.  It  is  most  prominent 
along  the  lateral  boundaries  of  the  vertebral  scutes.  In  the  position  of  the 
last  of  the  latter  it  is  most  prominent  at  the  middle.  No  distinct  carination 
exists,  but  a  feeble  and  widely  interruj^ted  ridge  occupies  the  median  line  of 
the  carapace,  scarcely  noticeable  were  it  not  better  developed  in  other  speci- 
mens. The  sides  of  the  carapace  slope  evenly  outward  to  the  rounded  flex- 
ure of  the  lateral  marginal  plates. 

The  posterior  marginal  plates  are  notched  as  in  the  snapper,  and  are  slightly 
recurved  at  the  prominent  ends.  Between  the  last  pair,  of  marginal  bones  a 
wide  concave  emargination  exists,  as  in  Chelydra,  but  of  less  depth. 

The  intermediate  vertebral  scute  tracts  are  nearly  square,  and  are  as  broad  • 
as,  or  a  little  broader  than,  long.     The  lateral  grooves  have  the  usual  brace 
form.     The  groove  between  the  second  and  third  tracts  is  convex  forward ; 
the  succeeding' one  much  less  so;  and  that  between  the  fourth  and  fifth  tracts 
is  much  produced  forward  with  a  mammiform  outline. 

The  costal  scute  tracts  are  nearly  like  those  of  Emys  and  Chelydra.  Their 
grooves  are  directed  nearly  parallel  outwardly,  except  the  extreme  back  and 
front  ones. 

The  plastron  appears  quite  flat  and  nearly  on  the  same  level  with  its  pedi- 
cles, but  this  condition  is  evidently  in  some  degree  the  result  of  accidental 
l^ressure  from  above.  The  posterior  extremity  is  broad,  linguiform,  with  the 
end  slightly  and  concavely  emarginate. 

The  pectoral  scute  impressions,  as  in  the  Chelydra,  are  larger  than  any 
others  of  the  plastron.  They  extend  outwardly  on  half  the  breadth  of  the 
sternal  bridges.  Tiie  anterior  groove  is  directed  outwardly  on  a  level  with 
the  bottom  of  the  axillary  fossae,  and  near  its  end  turns  abruptly  and  obliquely 
forward  to  the  edge  of  the  latter. 

The  abdominal  scute  impressions,  shorter  than  those  next  in  front  and 


163 

behind,  extend  upon  the  posterior  half  of  the  breadth  of  the  sternal  bridges. 
Their  posterior  groove  is  directed  obliquely  outward  and  backward  to  the 
bottom  of  the  inguinal  fossae. 

The  femoral  are  considerably  lai'ger  than  the  costal  scute  impressions,  and 
defined  from  them  by  a  sigmoid  groove. 

The  bridges  of  the  plastron  present  a  row  of  four  large  scutal  areas  inter- 
vening between  the  pectoral  and  abdominal  scute  areas  internally,  and  the 
marginal-scute  areas  of  the  carapace  externally.  The  first  and  last  of  these 
may  be  regarded  as  homologues  of  the  comparatively  small  axillary  and  ingui- 
nal scute  areas  of  Emydes;  the  intermediate  ones  are  superadded. 

The  axillary  scute  area,  partially  broken  away  in  the  specimen,  appears  to 
have  had  four  borders,  of  which  the  anterior  formed  the  outer  boundary  of 
the  axilla,  and  the  internal  joined  the  pectoral  scute  area. 

The  second  submarginal  scute  area,  the  smallest  of  the  series,  is  quadrate, 
and  internally  joins  the  pectoral  scute  area.  The  succeeding  submarginal 
area,  larger  than  those  in  advance,  is  pentagonal,  with  the  two  shorter  sides 
forming  a  projecting  angle  joining  the  pectoral  and  abdominal  areas. 

The  inguinal  scute  area,  larger  than  the  others,  has  four  borders,  of  which 
the  internal  joins  the  abdominal  area,  and  the  posterior  bounds  the  greater 
part  of  the  bottom  of  the  inguinal  space. 

The  surface  of  the  carapace  is  somewhat  irregular ;  that  of  the  plastron  is 
more  regularly  and  minutely  roughened  or  fretted  in  appearance. 

A  second  nearly  complete  specimen  of  a  shell  of  Baena  was  discovered  by 
Dr.  J.  Van  A.  Carter  at  Church  Buttes,  on  Black's  Fork  of  Green  River,  three 
miles  north  of  Fort  Bridger,  and  was  obligingly  sent  to  the  writer  as  a  gift. 
The  shell,  like  the  former  one,  is  considerably  crushed,  so  as  to  render  an 
exact  determination  of  its  original  form  uncertain.  It  approximated  the  other 
specimen  both  in  shape  and  size,  and,  like  it,  has  all  the  bones  so  completely 
co-ossified  that  their  limits  are  obliterated. 

This  second  specimen  presents  several  differences  from  the  former  one, 
which  led  to  its  having  been  considered  as  pertaining  to  another  species,  to 
which  the  name  of  B.  affinis  was  given.  Additional  specimens  since  obtahied 
and  exhibiting  other  variations  have  led  to  viewing  all  of  them  as  belonging 
to  a  single  species. 

The  carapace  measures  13  inches  in  length  following  the  curvature.  Its 
anterior  portion,  preserved  in  the  specimen  on  one  side,  has  a  rather  obtuse 
border,  and  is  not  recurved.     In  front  it  is  prominent,  as  far  as  seen  in  the 


164 

specimeii,  currespoiuliug  with  the  position  of  what  appears  to  be  tlie  outer 
portion  of  the  nuchal  scute  area.  The  latter  apparently  is  of  great  width,  at 
.least  an  inch  at  its  conjunction  with  the  first  vertebral  scute  area. 

The  latter  and  tlic  last  of  the  series  are  prominent  in  the  median  line,  where 
they  form  a  thick,  rounded  ridge.  A  low  interrupted  ridge  extends  along  the 
median  line  of  the  carapace,  which  is  barely  evident  in  the  first-described 
specimen.  The  short  divisions  of  the  ridge  are  flanked  by  equally  long  fusi- 
form elevations  slightly  divergent  forward.  In  addition,  the  carapace  is 
rather  irregularly  prominent  along  the  position  of  the  lateral  grooves  of  tlie 
vertebral  scute  areas.  The  intermediate  vertebral  scute  areas  are  proportion- 
ately narrower  than  in  the  first  specimen.  The  second  and  third  are  slightly 
longer  than  wide;  the  fourth  a  little  wider  than  long;  and  the  first  and  last 
in  width  considerably  exceed  the  length. 

The  jilastron  is  preserved  nearly  complete,  and  is  represented  in  Fig.  3, 
Plate  XIII.  It  appears  as  if  originally  it  had  been  less  flat  than  in  the  former 
specimen,  as,  inde])endently  of  fractures,  it  turns  up  more  at  the  extremities 
as  well  as  at  the  bridges. 

The  anterior  extremity,  which  is  lost  in  the  former  specimen,  affords  an 
opportunity  of  completing  our  knowledge  of  the  plastron.  It  is  shorter  and 
narrower  than  the  posterior  extremity,  but  is  nearly  like  it  in  shape.  The  free 
border  is  obtusely  rounded,  and  is  slightly  more  thickened  and  prominent  at  the 
divisions  jJroduced  by  the  scute  impressions.  These  do  not  mark  the  upper  sur- 
face as  in  the  Emydte.  The  lower  surface  exhibits  one  of  the  most  remarkable 
peculiarities  of  the  genus,  which  is  the  possession  of  two  pairs  of  gular  scutes. 

The  first  pair  of  gular  scutes  are  comparatively  small,  and  are  defined  poste- 
riorly, in, the  usual  manner,  by  oblique  grooves  diverging  at  an  angle' of  45°. 

The  second  pair  of  gular  scute  impressions  escaped  my  notice  until  I  had 
seen  several  additional  specimens.  As  this  did  not  occur  until  after  the  draw- 
ing of  Fig.  3  was  made,  they  are  not  there  represented.  They  are  seen  in 
Fig.  1,  Plate  XV,  which  was  subsequently  and  more  accurately  drawn  from 
the  same  specimen.  They  are  rather  larger  than  the  first  [)air,  and  are 
defined  posteriorly  by  a  serpentine  groove  directed  outwardly  nearly  from  the 
same  point  as  the  grooves  in  advance. 

The  remaining  scute  areas  of  the  plastron  are  nearly  like  those  of  the  pre- 
ceding specimen,  except  those  covering  the  pedicles. 

Only  three  scutes  covered  the  latter  in  the  second  specimen,  the  one  cor- 
responding with  the  first  submarginal  scute  area  of  llie  first  specimen  being 


165 

deficient.  Ta  conscqueticc  of  its  absence,  a  modification  of  tlie  outlines  ol'  t  he 
contiguous  ones  resulted.  The  posterior  groove  of  the  axillary  scute,  and  the 
anterior  groove  of  the  area  corresponding  with  the  second  submarginal  scute 
in  the  first  specimen,  instead  of  being  transversi;  are  oblique  and  join  each 
other  at  an  angle  externally.  The  posterior  two  scutal  areas  also  dilfer  from 
those  of  the  first  specimen  in  being  separated  l:)y  a  groove  directed  obliquely 
outward  and  backward  instead  of  nearly  transversely. 

The  surface  of  the  plastron  exhibits  tlie  same  minutely  fretted  appearance 
as  in  the  tbrnier  specimen. 

In  the  perfect  condition  the  two  specimens  of  Baena  which  have  been  de- 
scribed differed  but  little  in  size.  The  length  of  the  carapace  in  a  straight  line 
has  approximated  13  inches,  the  breadth  9  or  10  inches.  The  length  of  the  plas- 
tron is  11  inches;  its  breadth  to  its  conjunction  with  the  carapace  about  8  inches. 

A  third  and  less  perfect  specimen  of  the  shell  ef  Bac7ia  areiwsa,  consisting 
of  the  central  portion  of  the  carapace  and  nearly  the  corresponding  portion 
with  the  anterior  extremity  of  the  plastron,  was  found  l^y  Dr.  Carter  on 
Henry's  Fork  of  Green  River,  and  presented  by  him  to  the  Academy  of 
Natural  Sciences. 

This  specimen  had  about  the  same  size  as  the  previous  ones,  and  like  them 
has  all  the  bones  completely  co-ossified.  The  median  ridge  of  the  carapace  is 
more  distinct  than  in  the  other  specimens,  and  its  divisions  appear  more  or 
less  distinctly  to  mark  the  position  of  the  vertebral  plates,  while  the  lateral 
diverging  prominences  also  appear  to  mark  the  sides  of  these  plates.   • 

The  intermediate  vertebral  scute  areas  are  intermediate  in  proportions  to 
those  of  the  former  specimens. 

The  surface  of  the  plastron  is  smooth  and  exhibits  no  trace  of  the  minutely 
fretted  condition  observed  in  the  former  specimens.  The  grooves  defining 
the  sternal  scute  impressions,  the  median  groove  as  well  the  more  transverse 
ones,  are  less  regular  in  their  course  than  in  the  other  specimens. 

The  anterior  extremity  of  the  plastron,  represented  in  Fig.  2,  Plate  XV,  is 
flat,  and  exhibits  the  second  pair  of  gular  scute  areas  larger  than  in  the  former 
specimen  in  which  they  exist,  while  their  more  tortuous  back  groove  starts 
from  the  median  groove  a  half  inch  behind  that  in  front.  The  rounded  bor- 
der is  more  prominent  in  the  position  of  the  gular  scute  impressions  than  in 
the  former  specimen. 

A  small  part  of  the  sternal  bridges  retained  in  the  specimen  shows  a  por- 


1(56 


tioii  of  ilie  second  subinarginal  scute  area  witli  an  internal  projecting  angle 
intermediate  in  extent  to  that  of  the  former  specimens.  On  one  side,  also,  a 
small  portion  of  the  tirst  submarginal  area  is  retained,  and  this  appears  to 
indicate  that  it  was  nearly  of  the  size  and  shape  of  that  in  the  first-described 
specimen  of  Baena. 

Comparative   measurements  of  the  three   described  specimens  of  Baena 
arenosa  are  as  follows  : 


Leugth  of  first  vertebral  scute  at  middle 

Breadth  of  first  vertebral  scute  at  middle 

Leugth  of  second  vertebral  scute  at  middle 

Breadth  of  second  vertebral  scute  at  middle . 

Leugth  of  third  vertebral  scute  at  middle 

Breadth  of  third  vertebral  scute  at  middle 

Length  of  fourth  vertebral  scute  at  middle 

Breadth  of  fourth  vertebral  scute  at  middle 

Length  of  fifth  vertebral  scute  at  middle 

Breadth  of  fifth  vertebral  scute  at  middle 

Width  of  first  costal  scute  internally 

Width  of  second  costal  scute  internally 

Width  of  third  costal  scute  internally 

Width  of  fourth  costal  scute  internally 

Length  of  anterior  prolongation  of  the  plastron 

Breadth  at  base  of  anterior  prolongation  of  the  plastron . . 

Length  of  posterior  prolongation  of  the  plastron 

Breadth  at  base  of  posterior  i^rolongation  of  the  plastron . 

Breadth  of  pedicles  of  plastron 

Length  approximately  of  pedicles  of  plastron 

Leugth  of  gular  scutes  internally 

Breadth  of  gular  scutes  at  back  border 

Length  of  humeral  scutes  internally 

Breadth  of  humeral  scutes  at  back  border 

Length  of  pectoral  scutes  Internally 

Breadth  of  pectoral  scutes  at  middle 

Breadth  of  pectoral  scutes  at  back  border 

Length  of  abdominal  scutes  internally 

Breadth  of  abdominal  scutes  at  middle 

Breadth  of  abdominal  scutes  at  back  border 

Length  of  femoral  scutes  internally 

Breadth  of  femoral  scutes  at  back  border 

Length  of  caudal  scutes  internally 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  first  scute  of  pedicle 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  second  scute  of  pedicle 

Fore  and  sjft  diameter  of  third  scute  of  pedicle 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  fourth  scute  of  pedicle 


Liues. 


36 
30 
35 
37 
29 
37 
32 
48 


37 
32 
21 


46 

48 
50 
62 
26 


24 
32 
41 
31 
15 
41 
34 
28 
21 
21 


16 
20 

99 


Lines. 


22 
36 

35 

30 

35 

31 

28 

30 

26 

40 

34 

36 

30 

17 

35 

41 

48 

52 

58 

24 

10 

14 

26 

19 

24 

45 

31 

22 

38 

29 

26. 

22 

22 

18 


24 
20 


Lines. 


35 
32 
34 
32 


33 


38 
30 


37 

44 


52 
56 
24 
10 
15 
21 
22 
22 
50 
33 
20 
44 
28 
24 
19 


1G7 

A  fourth  specimen  referable  to  Baeiia  arenosa  consists  of  a  small  portion  of 
the  carapace  with  a  large  portion  of  the  plastron,  from  Henry's  Fork  of  Green 
River,  found  by  Dr.  Carter,  and  presented  by  him  to  the  Academy  of  Natural 
Sciences  of  Philadelphia.  This  exhibits  no  peculiarity,  excepting  that  the 
scutal  grooves  of  the  plastron  are  more  irregular  in  their  course  than  in  the 
preceding  specimens.  The  median  groove  of  the  plastron  is  especially  tor- 
tuous, while  in  the  other  specimens  it  is  nearly  straight.  A  retained  portion 
of  one  of  the  sternal  bridges  exliibits  evidences  that  four  scufes  impressed 
them,  arranged  nearly  as  in  the  first-described  specimen  of  Baena.  The  sur- 
face of  the  plastron  is  less  smooth  than  in  the  previous  specimen,  but  it  does 
not  present  the  fretted  appearance  of  the  two  former  ones. 

A  fifth  specimen,  apparently  referable  to  B.  arenosa,  consists  of  the  anterior 
extremity  of  a  plastron,  represented  in  Fig.  3,  Plate  XV.  It  was  found  at 
Grizzly  Buttes  by  Dr.  Joseph  K.  Corson,  and  by  him  presented  to  the 
Academy  of  Natural  Sciences.  It  would  appear  from  its  size  as  if  it  had 
belonged  to  a  larger  individual  than  the  preceding  specimens.  It  is  nearly 
flat,  or  in  a  trifling  degree  convex,  and  is  smooth,  or  without  any  appearance 
of  fretting.     It  exhibits  the  four  gular  scute  areas  of  unequal  extent. 

Another  specimen,  consisting  of  the  anterior  extremity  of  a  plastron,  appar- 
ently of  'a  young  animal  of  the  same  species,  is  represented  in  Figs.  4,  5, 
Plate  XV.  The  specimen  was  found  at  the  junction  of  the  Big  Sandy  and 
Green  Rivers,  Wyoming,  during  Professor  Hayden's  exploration  of  1870. 

In  this  specimen  the  sutures  are  visible,  and  the  contiguous  bones  defined 
The  grooves  defining  the  two  pairs  of  gular  scutes  start  all  from  the  same 
point,  which  is  near  the  center  of  the  entosternum.  The  entosternal  bone 
viewed  below  is  pyrilbrm,  but  in  the  reverse  position  to  that  ordinarily 
observed  in  emydcs.  Viewed  above,  it  resembles  that  of  the  snapper, 
(Cheli/dra,)  or  that  of  the  sea-turtle,  {Ckelove.)  In  front  it  is  received 
between  the  episternals ;  behind,  it  forms  two  lateral  barljs  projecting 
obliquely  outward  between  the  episternals  and  the  hyosternals,  and  a  long, 
median,  pointed  process  extending  between  the  hyosternals.  The  episternals 
posteriorly  are  angular,  and  are  there  received  into  a  notch  of  the  hyosternals. 

From  the  matrix  of  the  first-described  specimen  of  the  shell  of  Baena  I 
obtained  a  portion  of  the  pelvis,  which  presents  some  anatomical  points  of 
importance. 


168 


Comparative  measurements  of  the  anterior  extremity  of  the  plastron,  where 
this  is  present  in  the  specimens,  are  as  follows : 


First 
specimen. 

Second 
specimen. 

Third 
specimen. 

Fourth 
specimen. 

Sixth  speci- 
men, yonng. 

Length  of  plastrou  to  anterior  pectoral 
groove    .    ...             

Lines. 

Lines. 
34 
30 
28 
18 

Lines. 
30 
43 
28 
18 

Lines. 

37 

44 

■ 
34 

20 

Lines. 

Breadth  of  plastron  at  anterior  pectoral 

44 

Breadth  of  plastron  at  anterior  humeral 

20 

Breadth  of  plastron  at  middle  gular 
groove  

13 

The  pelvis  is  more  expanded  above  than  in  Emj^s,  and  in  this  respect  is 
more  like  that  of  the  snapper.  The  sacrum  represented  in  Fig.  9,  Plate 
XVI,  is  intermediate  in  its  proportions  to  that  of  the  two  genera  just  men- 
tioned. 

The  length  of  the  sacral  vertebrae  of  Baena,  independently  of  the  wings  or 
transverse  processes,  exceeds  the  breadth,  the  proportions  in  this  respect 
according  more  witli  the  condition  in  the  terrapin  than  in  the  snapper.  Tlie 
second  sacral  vertebra  is,  however,  larger  than  the  first,  as  in  the  latter  turtle, 
and  the  reverse  of  what  it  is  in  the  former.  The  inferior  surface  of  the 
bodies  of  the  sacral  vertebrse  is  half  cylindroid,  depressed  at  the  sides  in  the 
first  one,  but  scarcely  so  in  the  second. 

The  anterior  articular  surface  of  the  first  sacral  centrum  is  moderately 
convex ;  the  posterior  articular  surface  of  the  second  centrum  is  concave.  In 
Emys  the  corresponding  surfaces  are  flat,  or  nearly  so;  in  Chelydra  the  ante- 
rior one  is  concave,  the  posterior  convex,  with  lateral  extensions  nearly  flat. 

The  proportionate  length  and  robustness  of  the  sacral  ala3  of  Baena  agree 
more  nearly  with  the  condition  in  the  snapper  than  in  the  terrapin.  In  Emys 
the  posterior  alse  are  comparatively  feeble  appendages,  and  they  join  the  ends 
of  the  anterior  alse  by  means  of  a  hgaraent.  In  Baena  the  posterior  alse  are 
strong  processes,  as  in  the  snapper,  and  likewise,  as  in  this,  join  the  ends  of 
the  alee  in  advance  by  suture,  but  appear  not  to  be  prolonged  to  join  the 
ilium. 

The  innominatum  of  Baena,  as  represented  in  Fig.  8,  Plate  XVI,  is  proper- 


169 

tionately  of  more  robust  cliaracter  than  in  Erays.  The  ilium  in  filunx!  is 
more  like  that  of  this  genus  than  that  ot  the  snapper,  l)ut  is  proportionately 
ol'  much  greater  breadth,  the  wing  being  of  nearly  double  the  expanse. 

The  expanded  extremity  of  the  first  sacral  wing  articulates  with  the  ante- 
rior extremity  of  the  crest  of  the  ilium.  In  Emys  it  articulates  with  the 
latter  midway  to  the  two  prominent  extremities  of  the  crest. 

The  acetabuhim  and  commencements  of  the  ischiatic  and  pubic  rami  pi-e- 
sent  nothing  peculiar  from  the  condition  observed  in  the  snapper. 

Measurements  of  the  pelvic  specimens  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Length  of  sacrum  beneatli  the  centra 9j 

Length  of  first  sacral  centrum 4^ 

Breadth  of  first  sacral  centrum .■ 4.J 

Length  of  second  sacral  centrum 4^ 

Breadth  of  second  sacral  centrum 4? 

Breadth  of  sacrum  at  first  pair  of  alae 30 

Length  of  first  saci'al  alae , 13 

Length  of  second  sacral  alaj 11 

Length  of  innominatum 23 

Breadth  of  crest  of  innominatum 18 

Height  of  acetabulum C 

Breadth  of  acetabulum 9J 

CHISTERNON. 

Chisternon  undatum. 

A  large  turtle-shell,  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  in  a  chain  of  buttcs  a  few 
miles  from  Fort  Bridgcr,  and  presented  to  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
of  Philadelphia,  was  originally  described  by  me  under  the  name  of  Baena 
undata.  A  careful  examination  of  the  specimen  has  led  me  to  view  it  as  per- 
taining to  a  different  and  heretofore  undescribed  genus. 

The  specimen  represented  in  Plate  XIV,  one-half  of  the  diameter  of  nature, 
consists  of  the  intermediate  portion  of  a  shell,  with  the  extremities  broken 
away  nearly  in  the  position  of  the  broad  columns  wliich  spring  from  the  plas- 
tron to  support  the  carapace.  Though  much  fractured,  it  appears  to  have 
been  but  little  so  while  it  lay  imbedded  in  the  deposit  from  which  it  was 
derived,  so  that  it  now  retains  its  orginal  form.  The  upper  shell  is  as  mucli 
vaulted  as  in  some  of  the  living  land-turtles.  This  form,  together  with  the 
thick  bone  and  strong,  broad  sternal  supports,  enabled  it  to  sustain  tlic  grt'ut 
weight  of  superincumbent  pressure  which  has  crushed  so  many  of  its  asso- 
22  G 


170 

ciates.  The  interior  of  the  shell  is  occupied  by  a  greenish-gray  sandstone, 
from  which  I  obtained  a  pair  of  sacral  vertebrae. 

The  outline  of  the  shell  in  its  perfect  condition  was  ovoid  as  in  ordinary 
Emydes ;  narrower  and  more  elevated  in  front,  wider  and  more  depressed 
behind.  The  fore  part  and  sides  of  the  carapace  are  uniformly  convex,  but 
the  hind  part  appears  to  have  had  the  margin  somewhat  recurved.  Over  the 
position  of  the  vertebral  scute  areas  the  surface  is  flat  and  even  and  without 
a  carina.  The  plastron  is  flat,  but  its  bridges  turn  from  their  commencement 
upward  and  outward  to  the  border  of  the  carapace,  which  is  elevated  2^ 
inches  above  the  level.  The  highest  part  of  the  shell  is  nearly  6  inches 
above  the  level  of  the  plastron.  The  bones  of  the  shell,  especially  those  of 
the  carapace,  appear  co-ossified,  but  not  so  completely  as  in  Baena  arenosn, 
for  those  of  the  plastron  can  be  distinctly  traced. 

The  intermediate  vertebral  scute  areas  have  nearly  the  form  and  propor- 
tions of  those  of  Baena  arenosa,  and  are  rather  longer  than  wide.  The  costal 
scutes  widened  more  outwardly  than  in  that  turtle,  indicating  a  proportion- 
ately greater  degree  of  prominence  of  the  shell. 

The  lateral  marginal  scute  areas  are  much  like  those  in  Emydes,  but  the 
groove  defining  them  from  the  costal  scute  areas  exhibits  an  unusually  undu- 
lating course,  not  angular  but  serpentine  or  waving. 

The  number  and  relative  position  of  the  scute  areas  of  the  plastron  and  its 
bridges  are  the  same  as  in  Baena,  but  the  median  sternal  groove  defining 
them  on  the  two  sides  is  remarkable  for  its  irregular  serpentine  course, 
repeatedly  crossing  the  also  somewhat  irregular  course  of  the  median  suture 
of  the  plastron. 

The  sutures  of  the  plastron  being  visible,  they  reveal  to  us  an  unexpected 
peculiarity,  the  existence  or  absence  of  which  cannot  be  determined  in  the 
shells  of  Baena  arenosa  from  the  total  obliteration  of  the  sutures. 

The  peculiarity  in  the  plastron  of  Chisternon,  to  which  the  genus  owes  its 
name,  is  the  presence  of  a  large  triangular  bone,  added  to  those  which  usually 
exist  in  turtles,  on  each  side  of  the  shell.  This  intercalated  or  mesosternal 
bone  commences  at  the  center  of  the  plastron  and  gradually  widens  outwardly 
to  where  it  conjoins  the  marginal  plates  of  the  carapace  at  the  intermediate 
half  of  the  sternal  bridge.  The  four  sutures  defining  the  mesosternal  plates 
from  those  in  front  and  behind  cross  the  plastron  obliquely.     A  similar  bone 


171 

exists  in  another  extinct  genus,  the  Pleurosternon,  dI'  the  early  Tertiary  for- 
mation of  England,  but  in  this  it  has  the  shape  of  a  parallelogram. 

The  sternal  bridges  of  Chisteriiou  present  four  large  scutal  areas  nearly 
resembling  those  of  Baena  arenosa.  They  are  not  quite  symmetrical  on  the 
two  sides. 

The  axillary  scute  area  is  pentagonal,  and  is  the  smallest  of  the  series. 
The  anterior  border  is  oblique,  and.  bounds  the  axillary  notch  externally. 
Two  outer  borders  form  an  obtuse  angle  and  join  the  third  and  fourth  mar- 
ginal areas.     The  inner  border  joins  the  pectoral  area. 

The  second  submarginal  area  is  second  in  size  of  the  series.  It  is  longer 
than  l)road,  and  nearly  quadrate,  but  has  its  outer  angles  cut  off.  The  inner 
border  conjoins  the  pectoral  area;  the  outer  the  fourth  and  fifth  marginal 
areas. 

The  third  submarginal  area  is  but  little  larger  than  the  axillary  area.  It 
joins  the  pectoral  and  abdominal  areas  internally,  and  the  fifth  and  sixth 
marginal  areas  externally. 

The  inguinal  area,  the  largest  of  the  submai'ginal  areas,  is  obliquely  quad- 
rate, longer  than  broad,  and  with  the  outer  angles  cut  off.  The  posterior 
border  bounds  the  inguinal  notch ;  the  inner  border  joins  the  abdominal  area, 
and  the  outer  border  joins  the  sixth,  seventh,  and  eighth  marginal  areas. 

The  inferior  surface  of  the  plastron  is  comparatively  smooth.  Striatious 
cross  the  sutures,  and  elsewhere  it  presents  a  finely  reticulo-vascular  appear- 
ance. 

The  fractured  condition  of  the  shell  affords  us  an  opportunity  of  seeing 
the  strong  hyosternal  and  hyposternal  columns  which  aid  in  sustaining  the 
cai'apace.  These  columns  are  broad,  vertical  plates  reaching  far  into  the  cav- 
ity of  the  shell  and  dividing  it  into  three  compartments,  as  in  the  Batagur  of 
India. 

The  hyosternal  columns  are  2\  inches  wide  from  their  inner  concave  bor- 
der to  the  axilla.  The  aperture  of  the  shell  between  them  is  a  doorway  3 
inches  wide  near  the  roof  and  4^  inches  near  the  floor.  The  hyosternal  col- 
umns, partially  exposed  in  the  specimen,  appear  to  be  co-extensive  with  the 
anterior  supports. 

The  breadth  of  the  shell  of  Chisternon  undatum,  between  the  lateral 
obtuse  borders  of  the  carapace,  is  15  inches.  The  length  of  the  shell,  or  of 
the  carapace,  in  a  straight  line  is  estimated  to  have  been  about  a  foot  and  a 


172 

half.  The  length  of"  the  plastron  is  estimated  to  have  been  about  14  inches; 
its  breadth  at  the  root  of  the  posterior  extremity  is  5^  inches;  and  at  the  root 
of  the  anterior  extremity  has  been  rather  less.  The  sternal  bridges  measure 
7  inches  fore  and  aft,  and  their  length  to  the  outer  edge  of  the  carapace  is  5 
inches. 

Other  measurements  of  the  shell  are  as  follows : 

Inches. 

Length  of  second  vertebral  scute  area,  estimated  at 4 J 

Breadth  of  second  vertebral  scute  area 3^ 

Length  of  third  vertebral  scute  area 4J 

Breadth  of  third  vertebral  scute  area 3i 

Length  of  fourth  vertebral  scute  area Si 

Breadth  of  fourth  vertebral  scute  area 3i 

Breadth  of  second  costal  scute  area,  internally 4| 

Breadth  of  second  costal  scute  area,  externally 4J 

Breadth  of  third  costal  scute  area,  internally 3§ 

Breadth  of  third  costal  scute  area,  externally  3^ 

Height  of  sixth  and  seventh  marginal  scute  areas 2.J 

Length  of  hyposternals  internally 5 

Breadth  of  hyposternals  internally 5^ 

Breadth  of  hyosternals  Sf 

Breadth  of  plate  intercalated  between  the  hyosternals  and  hyposternals G 

Extent  of  the  same  plate  at  the  base  externally,  fore  and  aft 4f 

Breadth  of  groove  between  pectoral  and  abdominal  areas  where  it  joins  the  pro- 
jecting angle  of  the  third  sterno-costal  scute  areas 7J 

Breadth  of  plastron  at  anterior  suture  of  xiphisternals 4i 

Breadth  of  pectoral  scutes  to  sterno-costal  scutes 4  and  4^ 

Length  of  abdominal  scute  internally 3 

Length  of  femoral  scute  internally 3^ 

Axillary  scute  area,  length  at  middle 1^ 

Axillary  scute  area,  breadth  at  middle 2i 

First  submarginal  scute  area,  length  at  middle  . .   2i 

First  submarginal  scute  area,  breadth  at  middle. .    2^ 

Second  submarginal  scute  area,  length  at  middle    2 

Second  submarginal  scute  area,  breadth  at  middle - 2a 

Inguinal  scute  area,  length  at  middle 2f 

Inguinal  scute  area,  breadth  at  middle 2^ 

The  sacral  vertebrae,  represented  in  Figs.  11,  12,  Plate  XIX,  are  of  pro- 
portionately greater  length  than  in  Baena.  The  first  one  is  nearly  as  long  as 
it  is  broad ;  and  the  second  is  half  as  long  again  as  the  former,  and  is  equal 
ill  this  respect  to  its  breadth. 

The  anterior  articulation  of  the  first  sacral  centrum  forms  a  decided  cup- 
like depression,  and  not  merely  a  transverse  concavity  like  that  in  the  snap- 
per.    The  second  sacral  centrum  is  prolonged  to  an  unusual  degree  beyond 


17^ 

the  neural  arch.  It  ends  iu  a  flat,  roughened  articular  surface,  as  if  iulendrd 
for  tlie  conjunction  of  another  vertebra  entering  into  the  constitution  of  llu; 
sacrum.  The  neural  arches  of  the  sacral  vertebrie  are  proportionately  higher 
than  in  the  snapper,  and  they  appear  to  have  articulated  movably  with  each 
other  by  zygapophyses  alone. 

The  diapophyses  are  about  equally  developed  with  those  in  the  snapper. 
The  neural  arch  is  not  co-ossified  with  the  centrum ;  nor  are  the  pleurapophyses 
co-ossified  with  either. 

Measurements  of  the  sacral  vertebaa  are  as  follows  : 

Liues. 

Length  of  the  sacrum  inferiorly 18 

Length  of  first  sacral  centrum 7 

Breadth  of  first  sacral  vertebra,  with  diapophyses 9 

Length  -of  second  sacral  centrum 11 

Breadth  of  secoud  sacral  vertebra,  witli  diapophyses 10^ 

Height  of  first  sacral  vertebra  to  end  of  spinous  process 13 

Height  of  anterior  articulation  of  first  sacral  centrum ■. 5 

Breadth  of  anterior  articulation  of  first  sacral  centrum 5 

An  isolated  vertebra,  from  Henry's  Fork  of  Green  River,  looks  as  if  it 
might  be  the  first  sacral  of  Chisternon  undatum.  The  body  is  little  more  than 
half  the  length  of  that  of  the  last  sacral  above  described,  but  its  anterior 
articular  surface  agrees  in  size,  form,  and  roughness  with  the  posterior  sur- 
face of  the  last  sacral  centrum  just  mentioned.  .The  pleurapophyses  have 
about  the  same  degree  of  develo])ment  as  in  the  snapper. 

Fig.  10,  Plate  XVI,  represents  a  caudal  vertebra,  obtained  by  Dr.  Carter 
near  Lodge-Pole  Trail.  In  construction  it  resembles  the  caudals  of  the 
snapper,  the  centrum,  as  in  this,  lieing  opisthocoelian,  or  having  a  cup  behind 
and  a  ball  in  front.  The  proportions  of  the  vertebra  accord  best  with  the 
more  anterior  caudals  of  the  snapper,  but  its  transverse  processes  are  as  small 
as  in  the  terminal,  caudals  of  the  latter.  Perhaps  it  may  belong  to  Chister- 
non, but  the  opinion  is  conjectural.  If  the  former  isolated  vertebra  belongs 
to  Chisternon,  it  is  doubtful  whether  this  second  one  does. 

Fig.  7,  Plate  XVI,  represents  an  isolated  ilium  of  a  turtle,  found  at  Grizzly 
Buttes  by  Dr.  Carter.  It  resembles  in  its  form  that  of  a  snapper,  but  is  more 
robust  in  proportion  to  its  length.  The  inner  surface  at  the  up])er  extremity 
is  flat  and  longitudinally  striated,  but  is  devoid  of  the  fossa  existing  in  the 
.snapper.  The  length  of  the  bone  is  3^  inches;  the  width  of  its  upper  end 
!|  of  an  inch  ;   the  width  at  the  lower  end  is  17  liues.     From  the  form  ol'llie 


174 

bone  I  would  suspect  that  it  belonged  to  Chisternon,  rather  than  to  either 
Emys  Carteri  or  Baptemys  wyomingensis. 

HYBEMYS. 

Hybemys  akenarius. 

Two  Httle  specimens,  obtained  by  Professor  Hayden,  in  the  Tertiary  for- 
mation of  Little  Sandy  Creek,  Wyoming,  appear  to  indicate  a  previously 
undescribed  turtle,  to  which  the  above  name  was  given.     They  consist  of 

m 

a  detached  marginal  bone,  and  a  fragment  of  a  costal  plate  of  a  species 
about  the  size  of  the  common  spotted  turtle,  Emys  guttata.  The  bones  are 
unusually  thick  in  proportion  to  their  breadth,  compared  with  those  of  ordi- 
nary recent  Emydes.  Their  surface  is  smooth  and  strongly  marked  by  the 
lines  of  separation  of  the  scute  areas.  The  costal  ridge  on  the  interior  of  the 
costal  plate  is  scarcely  perceptible ;  the  costal  capitulum  is  rather  stouter 
than  in  Emydes. 

The  marginal  plate  represented  in  Fig.  9,  Plate  XV,  is  especially  remark- 
able, and  it  is  upon  its  peculiarity  that  the  genus  is  inferred.  It  would  appear 
to  correspond  with  the  ninth  of  the  series,  and  has  the  same  form  as  in  the 
corresponding  plate  of  ordinary  Emydes.  The  outer  portion  of  the  upper 
surface,  strongly  defined  by  the  groove  of  the  costal  scute,  exhibits  at  its  fore 
and  back  part  a  half-circular  boss,  occupying  the  middle  of  the  marginal 
scute  areas.  As  we  may  safely  infer  the  other  marginals  to  have  the  same 
construction,  it  follows  that  the  margin  of  the  carapace  is  ornamented  with  a 
circle  of  hemispherical  bosses,  each  of  which  is  crossed  by  the  sutures  of  the 
marginal  bones. 

ANOSTEIRA. 

Anosteira  oenata. 

Among  the  many  remains  of  turtles  from  the  Bridger  Tertiary  formation, 
submitted  to  my  examination  from  time  to  time,  by  Dr.  Carter  and  Professor 
Hayden,  there  were  a  few  isolated  plates  of  peculiar  character  which  were 
described  and  referred  to  a  genus  and  species  under  the  above  name.  Sub- 
sequently Dr.  Carter  discovered  many  parts  of  a  shell  of  the  same  species, 
which  we  have  endeavored  to  collocate  as  represented  in  Figs.  1,  2,  Plate 
XVI. 

Anosteira  is  a  remarkable  genus,  very  unlike  any  other  turtle,  'previously 


175 

described,  recent  or  extinct.  The  carapace  and  plastron,  while  being  com- 
pletely ossified  as  in  Testudines,  Eniydes,  &c.,  are  ornamented  in  a  manner 
only  seen  to  the  same  degree  in  the  soft-shelled  turtles.  True,  we  see  some- 
thing like  ornamentation  of  the  same  kind  in  some  of  the  Emydes,.but  in 
them  the  condition  is  comparatively  feeble.  The  osseous  shell  also  appears 
to  be  devoid  of  the  usual  outlines  more  or  less  sti'ongly  expressed  of  the  in- 
vesting scutes.  A  few  of  the  plates  exhibit  obscure  lines,  but  I  am  uncertain 
as  to  whether  they  accord  with  the  areas  of  the  scutes. 

The  outline  of  the  carapace  is  broadly  cordiform  and  somewhat  resembles 
that  of  the  ordinary  sea-turtles,  but  is  not  acute  posteriorly  as  in  these,  being 
obtuse  as  in  the  Bmydes.  The  prominence  of  the  carapace  is  moderate  as  in 
the  less  elevated  forms  of  the  latter.  It  is  uniformly  convex,  except  that  it 
is  acutely  carinated  in  the  median  line  posteriorly. 

The  margin  of  the  carapace  anteriorly  is  rather  obtuse,  but  laterally  and 
posteriorly  is  quite  sharp.  It  is  broadly  and  concavely  notched  in  front ;  the 
first  pair  of  marginal  plates  being  the  most  prominent  portions  anteriorly. 
Antero-laterally  it  is  slightly  concave,  and  from  this  position  posteriorly  is 
uniformly  convex. 

The  plastron  with  its  bridges  is  flat,  and  is  intermediate  in  its  relative  pro- 
portions with  that  of  the  snappers  and  Emydes.  The  bridges  articulate  with 
the  carapace  by  gomphosis,  as  seen  in  Fig.  2.  They  join  the  marginal  plates 
from  the  fifth  to  the  eighth  inclusive.  The  extremities  of  the  plastron  are 
botli  broken  away  in  the  specimen. 

The  vertebral  plates  of  the  carapace  are  narrow  coffin-shaped.  Those  an- 
terior are  nearly  level ;  those  posterior  are  acutely  carinated. 

The  costal  plates  within  exhibit  no  costal  elevation,  but  are  quite  level,  as 
represented  in  Fig.  3.     The  costal  capitula  are  unusually  broad  but  thin. 

The  inner  surface  of  the  nuchal  plate  at  the  posterior  border  presents  a 
pair  of  round  articular  processes  for  conjunction  with  the  contiguous  vertebra. 

The  upper  surface  of  the  carapace  is  ornate  with  rugosities.  These  are 
obsolete  on  the  vertebral  plates.  On  the  costal  plates  they  appear  as  longi- 
tudinal, undulating,  and  nearly  parallel  ridges  crossing  the  plates.  Internally 
they  are  feebly  developed  and  become  more  strongly  marked  proceeding  out- 
wardly. 

On  the  marginal,  including  the  nuchal  and  pygal  plates,  the  rugosities  arc 
finer,  closer,  more  interrupted,  and  in  part  even  granular. 


17G 

Beneatli,  the  rugosities  of  the  marginal  plates  have  a  decidedly  radiant 
appearance.  The  under  surface  of  the  marginals  in  advance  of  the  axillary 
notches,  and  the  corresponding  surface  of  the  nuchal  plate,  are  smooth  or  de- 
void of  the  ornate  rugosities. 

The  pygal  plate  and  the  contiguous  marginals  increase  in  thickness  from 
their  free  acute  edge  inwardly,  so  as  to  be  wedge-shaped  in  section.  The 
base  of  the  wedge,  directed  toward  the  cavity  of  the  shell,  is  strongly  grooved 
in  the  pygal  plate,  and  gradually  less  so  in  the  contiguous  marginal  plates. 
The  groove  contributes  to  the  general  cavity  of  the  shell.  Fig.  6  represents 
a  fore  and  aft  section  of  the  pygal  plate,  exhibiting  the  groove  on  its  inner  part. 

The  plates  of  the  plastron  exhibit  their  ornate  ridges  arranged  in  a  radiat- 
ing manner,  as  seen  in  Fig.  2,  but  they  are  less  prominent  than  those  of  the 
carapace. 

The  shell  of  the  specimen  of  Anosteira,  from  which  the  above  description 
was  taken,  in  its  entire  condition,  was  about  5  inches  in  length  in  the  median 
line  and  about  4^  inches  in  breadth. 

Figs.  4,  5,  represent  two  anterior  marginal  [)lates,  showing  that  the  species 
reaches  a  much  greater  size. 

TRIONYX. 

Trionyx  guttatus. 

One  or  more  species  of  the  soft-shelled  turtles  (  Trionyx)  are  indicated  by 
an  abundance  of  fragments  of  shells  which  have  come  under  my  notice  in  the 
various  collections  of  fossils  from  the  Bridger  beds.  Anything  like  complete 
shells  appear  to  be  rare,  as  the  best  preserved  which  has  yet  been  submitted 
to  my  examination  is  the  portion  of  a  carapace  i-epresented  in  Fig.  1,  Plate 
IX.  The  specimen,  attached  to  a  mass  of  sandstone,  was  obtained  at  Church 
Buttes,  near  Fort  Bridger,  during  Professor  Hayden's  exploration  of  1868 

The  osseous  carapace  in  its  entire  condition  is  estimated  to  have  been 
about  a  foot  and  a  quarter  in  length,  and,  independently  of  the  extension  of 
the  free  ends  of  the  riljs,  has  nearly  reached  that  breadth.  The  bones  range 
from  three  to  four  lines  in  thickness,  except  along  the  position  of  the  costal 
ridges  and  near  the  thinner  edges. 

The  carapace  appears  to  iiave  had  the  usual  composition  of  seven  vertebral 
plates,  and  eight  pairs  of  costal  plates  back  of  the  nuchal  plate.     It  was  mod-  ■ 
erately  convex,  and  the  posterior  border  in  the  specimen  is  deeply  scolloped. 


177 

The  vertebral  plates  in  the  specimen,  consisting  of  part  of  the  second,  tliini, 
and  itmrtli,  are  reversed  coffin-shaped,  and  nearly  twice  as  long  as  wide. 
Their  anterior  border  is  convex,  and  the  posterior  border  concave. 

The  fifth  vertebral  plate  is  smaller  than  the  preceding,  and  becomes  eaiTier 
narrowed  from  the  sides  toward  the  back  end. 

The  sixth  plate  is  lozenge-shaped,  about  as  long  as  it  is  wide,  and  occupies 
the  space  between  the  truncated  angles  of  the  sixth  and  seventh  costal  plates. 
The  latter  meet  in  the  median  line  for  more  than  half  their  width. 

The  seventh  vertebral  plate  is  a  very  small  lozenge-shaped  bone,  with  a 
crucial  ridge  on  its  surface,  occupying  an  interval  produced  by  the  truncation 
of  the  contiguous  angles  of  the  seventh  and  eighth  pairs  of  costal  plates. 

The  costal  plates,  from  the  fourth  to  the  sixth  inclusive,  are  nearly  of  the 
same  width  internally,  and  they  successively  become  more  widened  out- 
wardly. The  seventh  costal  plate  is  rather  wider  at  the  extremities  tlian 
intermediately.  The  last  costal  plates  are  nearly  as  wide  fore  and  aft  as  from 
within  outwardly. 

The  surface  of  the  carapace  is  sculptured  tor  the  most  part  with  broad, 
rounded,  and  isolated  concave  pits  resembling  the  impression  of  rain-drops  on 
a  soft  surface.  Only  near  the  outer  border  of  the  costal  plates,  where  these 
are  preserved,  do  the  pits  become  more  or  less  confluent,  usually  in  twos  and 
threes.  The  reticular  ridges  bounding  the  pits  are  broad  and  low,  and  often 
as  wide  as  the  included  pits. 

Measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Length  of  tliird  vertebral  plate . . 23 

Width  of  third  vei'tebral  plate  iu  front 7 

Width  of  third  vertebral  plate  behind    12 

Length  of  fourth  vertebral  ijlate 20J 

Width  of  fourth  vertebral  plate  in  front 7^ 

Width  of  fourth  vertebral  plate  behind 10;^ 

Length  of  fifth  vertebral  plate , I'Ji 

Width  of  fifth  vertebral  plate  in  front 7 

Width  of  iifth  vertebral  plate  at  middle Sft 

Length  of  sixth  vertebral  plate - 10 

Width  of  sixth  vertebral  plate  at  anterior  third 10 

Length  of  seventh  vertebral  plate 5| 

Width  of  seventh  vertebral  plate  at  middle 5 

Width  of  fourth  costal  plate  fore  and  aft  at  inner  part 23 

Width  of  fifth  costal  plate  fore  and  aft  at  inner  part    22 

Width  of  sixth  co.stal  plate  fore  and  aft  at  inner  part 21 

Width  of  seventh  costal  plate  fore  and  aft  at  inner  part IDJ 

23  G 


178 

Liucs. 

Width  of  eighth  costal  plate  fore  and  aft  at  inner  part ...  18 

Length  of  sixth  costal  plate  at  middle 58 

Length  of  seventh  costal  plate  at  middle ...  41 

Length  of  eighth  costal  plate  at  middle 22 

Many  fragments,  l)oth  of  the  carapace  and  plastron  of  soft-shelled  turtles, 
collected  during  Professor  Hayden's  expedition  of  1870,  and  subsequently 
bj'  Drs.  Carter  and  Corson  at  various  localities  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger, 
appear  to  be  referable  to  the  same  species  as  the  above. 

A  specimen  consisting  of  the  right  half  of  a  nuchal  plate,  with  an  attached 
piece  of  a  first  costal,  derived  from  the  same  locality  as  the  specimen  above 
described,  belonged  to  an  animal  about  the  same  size.  The  width  of  the 
scabrous  portion  of  the  nuchal  plate  in  its  complete  condition  was  about  6f 
inches;  its  fore  and  aft  extent  1^  inches.  The  sculpturing  of  the  surface  is 
more  interrupted  or  broken  than  in  the  specimen  specially  referred  to  Trionyx 
guttatus.  The  reticular  ridges  ^.re  narrower  and  sharper,  and  exhil)it  a  dis- 
position to  rise  in  points  at  their  intersection. 

A  specimen  consisting  of  an  outer  portion  of  an  intermediate  costal  plate 
measures  3f  inches  wide,  and  is  5  lines  thick.  The  reticulation  of  its  sur- 
liicc  is  unbroken,  but  otherwise  it  reseml)les  that  of  the  nuchal  plate  just 
described. 

Teionyx  uintaensis. 

During  my  stay  at  Fort  Bridger,  in  a  trip  to  Dry  Creek,  Major  R.  S. 
La  Motte  discovered  the  nearly  complete  carapace  of  a  Trionyx,  which  he 
presented  to  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia.  The  sjieci- 
men  is  represented  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  XXIX,  one-half  the  natural  size.  On  first 
view  I  supposed  it  to  belong  to  the  same  species  as  the  former,  but  compar- 
ison of  the  specimen  with  that  of  Fig.  1  of  Plate  IV  leads  to  the  belief  that 
it  pertains  to  a  different  one. 

The  carapace  is  about  16J  inches  long  and  16  inches  broad,  so  that  its 
proportions  are  reversed  from  those  in  our  living  Trionyx  muticus.  It  is 
about  as  convex  as  in  the  latter,  and  appears  to  have  been  slightly  depressed 
along  the  position  of  the  vertebral  plates,  judging  from  that  portion  of  the 
shell  back  of  the  fiith  costal  plates,  as  in  advance  of  this  the  specimen  has  • 
been  crushed  inwardly.  The  fore  and  back  part  of  the  carapace  is  truncated, 
as  in  T.  miiflcys.  The  posterior  truncation,  slightly  sinuous,  extends  the 
width  of  the  last  two  pairs  of  costal  plates.     In  T.  gtittalus  the  corresponding 


179 


border  occupied  1)}  the  latter  is  convex,  and  exliibits  three  deep  .siiuiosilies — 
the  middle  one  and  the  one  on  each  side,  as  seen  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  IX. 

Eiglit  })airs  of  costal  plates  succeed  the  nuchal  plate.  The  second,  fifth, 
and  sixth  pairs  expand  considerably  outward,  more  especially  the  last  of 
these.     The  others  are  of  more  uniform  breadth. 

The  specimen  possesses  only  six  vertebral  plates.  Of  these,  the  first  is  the 
longest  and  widest.  Its  fore  border  is  convex,  and  nearly  in  a  line  with  the 
suture  between  the  nuchal  and  first  pair  of  costal  plates.  The  lateral  borders 
diverge  to  the  back  angles, -which  are  truncated  to  join  the  second  pair  of 
costal  plates. 

-  The' second  and  third  vertebral  plates  are  nearly  equal  in  size,  and  are 
reversed  coffin-shaped.  The  fourth  plate  is  smaller,  and  oblong  (pmdrate, 
with  convex  borders.  The  fifth  plate  is  obverse  coffin-shaped,  shorter,  but 
wider  than  the  former.  "^Fhe  sixth  vertebral  plate  has  not  more  than  half  its 
usual  development.  It  is  pentagonal  shield-like,  and  is  included  between  the 
angles  of  the  fifth  and  sixth  costal  plates. 

The  posterior  half  of  the  sixth  costal  plates,  and  those  succeeding  them, 
unite  in  the  median  line  by  a  tortuous  suture. 

The  surface  of  the  carapace  presents  a  nearly  uniform  reticular  aspect 
and  the  thickness  of  the  bones  is  of  the  usual  proportion. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 


Space  occupied  by  the  six  vertebral  plates 

Breadth  of  uucljal  plate 

Extent  of  uuclial  plate  in  median  line 

Breadth  together  of  seventh  pair  of  costal  plates 
Breadth  together  of  eighth  pair  of  costal  plates  . 


Inches. 


m 

34 


Breadth. 


First  vertebi'al  plate . . . 
Secoud  vertebral  plate . 
■  Third  vertebral  plate  . . 
Fourth  vertebral  plate 
Fifth  vertebral  plate . . . 
Sixth  vertebral  plate . . . 


180 


Leugtli. 


Depth 
iutcrnally. 


Depth 
externally. 


First  costal  plate  . . 
Sceoiul  costal  i)late- 
TLird  costal  plate  . . 
Foiirtli  costal  [)late. 
Fifth  costal  plate  . . . 
Sixth  costal  plate  . . . 
Seveuth  costal  plate 


I  Itches. 
G 
8 
8 

8 
8 

7 


Lines. 

29 
22 
21 
23 

18 
16 


Lines. 
32 
38 
26 
26 
33 
42 
21 


REMAINS  OF  TRIONYX  OF  UNDETERMINED  SPECIES. 

Small  tVagineuts  of  Trioiiyx  shells,  from  the  Bridger  Tertiary  strata,  exhib- 
iting a  ditrereiit  kind  of  surface-marking  or  sculpture  from  that  of  the  specimens 
referred  to  the  preceding  species,  probably  indicate  others,  or,  perhaps,  differ- 
ent genera.   . 

A  specimen  found  l>y  Dr.  Carter  at  Dry  Creek,  and  represented  in  Fig.  11, 
Plate  XVI,  is  an  outer  fragment  of  a  costal  plate.  It  is  not  pitted  as  in 
Tronyx  guttatus,  but  is  crossed  obliquely  by  coarse  ridges  with  the  intervals 
occupied  by  a  lattice  of  narrower  ridges.  Probably  the  specimen  may  belong 
to  a  species  of  Anosteira. 

Another  fragment  of  a  costal  plate,  from  Little  Sandy  Creek,  is  represented 
in  Fig.  12  of  the  same  plate.  This  specimen  differs  from  the  former  in  being 
crossed  by  widely  separated  ridges,  with  the  intervals  finely  pitted. 

Other  specimens  exhibit  slight  differences  from  the  foregoing  and  from 
those  of  Trionyx  gutlatus,  but  are  too  imperfect  to  enable  one  to  form  any 
idea  of  their  relationship. 

•  Order  Lacertilia. 

The  lizards  have  vertebrae  with  concavo-convex  bodies,  and  have  the  teeth 
co-ossified  with  the  jaws.  The  skin  is  furnished  with  horny  or  bony  scales. 
True  lizards,  allied  to  the  existing  monitors,  iguanas,  and  chameleons,  appear 
to  have  been  abundant  and  of  varied  character  in  the  ancient  Wyoming  fauna. 
Few  remains  of  these  animals,  described  in  the  succeeding  pages,  have  been 
submitted  to  my  inspection,  but  Professor  Marsh  has  indicated  and  briefly 
described  twenty-one  species-  of  five  extinct  genera  from  fossils  obtained 
by  him  from  the  Bridger  beds. 


181 

SANIVA. 

Saniva  ensidens. 

An  extinct  lizard,  to  whicli  the  above  name  has  l)cen  applied,  is  indicated 
by  some  remains  discovered  during  Professor  Ilaydcn's  exploration  of  1870, 
near  Granger,  Wyoming.  The  remains  consist  of  portions  of  a  skeleton,  in  a 
fragmentary  condition,  imbedded  in  an  indurated  ash-colored  marl  rock.  The 
bones  are  black,  and  the  hollows  of  the  long  Ijones,  including  the  ribs  and 
phalanges,  are  occupied  with  crystalline  calcite. 

The  remains  belong  to  a  lacertian  about  the  size  of  the  existing  monitor 
of  the  Nile,  to  which  it  appears  to  have  been  closely  related.  The  bones 
indicate  a  robust  body,  a  long  tail,  and  limbs  with  long  toes. 

The  vertebrae  resemble  those  of  the  Nilotic  monitor  in  form  and  propor- 
tions, and  like  them  possess  no  zygosphenal  articulation. 

A  pair  of  dorsal  vertebrae  are  represented  in  Fig.  15,  Plate  XV.  Tlie  body 
is  J  an  inch  long  inferiorly,  and  measures  f  of  an  inch  l^etween  the  dia- 
pophyses.  The  ball  and  socket  extremities  are  twice  the  breadth  of  the  height. 
The  ball  measures  4  lines  in  breadth  and  2  lines  in  height.  The  neural  arch 
laterally  at  the  zygapophyses  is  nearly  8  lines  long. 

An  anterior  caudal  has  the  same  length  as  the  dorsals,  but  is  narrower. 
The  ball  is  of  less  width,  but  the  same  height.  The  hypopophyses  for  the 
chevron  are  quite  prominent,  and  are  situated  a  short  distance  in  advance  of 
the  ball,  as  in  the  monitor. 

A  small  detached  tooth,  imbedded  in  the  same  mass,  in  proximity  to  some 
small  skull-fragments,  presents  the  form  and  constitution  of  those  of  the  moni- 
tors. It  is  represented  in  Fig.  35,  Plate  XXVII,  magnified  eight  diameters. 
The  length  of  the  tooth  is  about  IJ  lines;  its  breadth,  f  of  a  line;  and  its 
thickness,  J  a  line.  It  is  compressed  conical,  feebly  curved  niwardly  and  back- 
ward, sharp-pointed,  has  abruptly  impressed  trenchant  borders,  and  is  smooth 
and  shining.  It  is  hollow,  and  has  thick  walls.  The  transverse  section  of 
the  base  is  rhomboidally  oval,  with  acute  poles. 

In  breaking  off  portions  of  the  rock  containing  the  bones  aljove  described, 
there  was  exposed  what  appears  to  be  the  anterior  extremity  of  a  maxillary 
containing  the  remains  of  six  teeth.  The  fragment  is  4  lines  long  and  1^- 
lines  deep.  The  teeth  are  pleurodont  in  character,  but  appear  different  in 
ibrm  from  tlie  isolated  tooth  above  indicated,  and  have  more  resemblance  in 
shape  to  those  of  the  iguana.     The  specimen  appears  so  small  in  ils  propor- 


182 

tions  with  the  other  bones,  that  it  leads  to  the  suspicion  that  it  may  not  belong 
to  the  same  skeleton. 

No  scales  were  ibund  in  association  with  the  bones  in  the  same  mass  of 
rock. 

The  name  Saniwa,  according  to  Professor  Hayden,  is  nsed  by  one  of  the 
Indian  tribes  of  the  Upper  Missonri  for  a  rock-lizard-. 

Saniva  major. 

Several  fragments,  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  near  the  Lodge-Pole  Trail, 
crossin'g  Dry  Creek,  would  appear  to  indicate  a  larger  species  of  Saniva.  The 
specimens  are  of  a  greenish  hue  and  somewhat  smooth  or  water-worn,  and 
were  derived  from  a  green  sandstone  stratum. 

One  of  the  fossils  consists  of  the  distal  extremity  of  a  humerus,  repre- 
sented in  Fig.  14,  Plate  XV.  It  resembles  in  general  aspect  the  correspond- 
ing portion  of  the  humerus  of  the  monitor,  but  the  shaft  is  proportionately 
more  robust,  and  not  so  much  narrowed  toward  the  middle.  It  is  occupied 
by  a  large  medullary  cavity  with  compact  walls,  as  in  the  humerus  of  a  bird. 
The  internal  epicondyle  appears  less  prominent  than  in  the  monitor,  in  con- 
sequence of  the  less  degree  of  contraction  of  the  shaft.  The  external  epicon- 
dyle does  not  reach  upward  to  more  than  half  the  relative  extent  it  does  in 
the  monitor,  and  it  is  not  perforated.  The  ulnar  eminence  is  prominent  in 
front,  but  projects  below  to  a  less  degree  than  the  radial  capitellum. 

The  breadth  of  the  bone  at  the  epicondyles  is  f  of  an  inch.  The  greater 
diameter  or  breadth  of  the  shaft  at  the  broken  end  is  3|  lines ;  the  short 
diameter  is  2^  lines. 

Another  of  the  fossils  consists  of  a  pair  of  dorsal  vertebras,  represented  in 
Figs.  36,  37,  Plate  XXVII.  They  agree  in  all  respects  with  the  two  vertebrae 
referred  to  the  former  species,  except  that  they  are  considerably  larger. 

The  bodies  of  the  vertebrae  inferiorly  measure  7|  lines  in  length  and  lOi 
lines  in  width  between  the  diapophyses.  The  ball  measures  5  lines  in  In-eadth 
and  3  hnes  in  height.  The  neural  arch  laterally  at  the  zygapophyses  is  10 
lines  in  length 

GLYPTOSAURUS. 

Professor  Marsh  has  described,  in  the  American  Journal  of  Science  and 
Arts  for  1871,  another  genus  of  extinct  lizards,  under  the  above  name,  from 
remains  obtained  in  the  liridger  Tertiary.     He  observes  that  "the  head  was 


183 

covered  willi  large  osseous  shields  symmetrically  iirniiigcd  and  highly  orna- 
mented. Other  i)ai-ts  of  the  body,  especially  the  ventral  region,  were  pi-o- 
tected  by  rectangular,  ornamented  shields,  united  to  each  other  Ijy  suture. 
The  teeth  are  pleurodont,  and  are  round  with  obtuse  summits.  The  dorsal 
and  caudal  vertebra?  have  the  same  general  form  as  those  of  Varauus,  but  show 
traces  of  a  zygospheue  articulation. 

Professor  Marsh  indicates  eight  species,  maiidy  liiunded  on  diii'erences  in 
the  position,  form,  and  ornamentation  of  the  dermal  osseous  shields  and  the 
form  of  the  teeth. 

Dr.  Carter  has  submitted  to  my  examination  a  number  of  specimens  col- 
lected by  him  at  Grizzly  Buttes,  which  in  part  or  whole  are  attributable  to 
the  same  genus,  and  mostly  to  the  species  named  Glijptosaurus  ocellatus. 

Several  of  the  dermal  shields  from  the  trunk  of  the  body  are  represented 
in  Figs.  13  to  15,  Plate  XVI,  and  several  of  the  cranial  shields  in  Figs.  16, 17, 
of  the  same  plate,  all  magnified  two  diameters. 

The  dermal  shields  of  the  trunk  are  oblong  cpiadrate,  with  the  longer  mar- 
gins thick  and  roughened  for  sutural  conjunction  with  one  another.  The  ex- 
tremities thin  out  for  imbrication.  The  anterior  exti-emity,  which  is  over- 
lapped by  the  shield  in  advance,  extends  a  third  or  more  of  the  length  of  the 
plate,  and  is  smooth.  The  posterior  two-thirds  or  less  of  the  shields  are  orna- 
mented on  their  free  surface  with  nnnided  knobs  or  tubercles,  closely  arranged 
in  more  or  less  concentric  rows. 

The  cranial  shields  are  from  foui-  to  six  sided,  and  proi)ortionately  of  greater 
thickness  than  the  former.  All  their  margins  are  roughened  for  sutural  at- 
tachment together,  and  their  free  surface  is  ornamented  in  the  same  manner 
as  the  shields  of  the  trunk. 

Accompanying  the  specimens  of  dermal  shields  above  described,  there  are 
several  detached  vertebrae.  One  of  the  specimens  is  a  dorsal  vertebra  re- 
sembling those  of  Saniva,  but  somewhat  smaller,  and,  like  them,  presents  no 
zygosphene  articulation.  It  may  probably  belong  to  that  genus.  The  other 
specimen  is  an  intermediate  caudal  vertebra  of  the  same  proportions  of  length 
and  breadth  as  in  Saniva,  but  the  ball  and  socket  articulation  is  as  high  as  it 
is  wide.  It  has  no  zygophene  articulation,  and  the  hypopophyses  for  the 
chevron  are  immediately  beneath  the  ball  of  the  body.  The  length  of  the 
latter  interiorly  is  2|  lines.  - 


184 

CHAMELEO. 

Chameleo  peistinus. 

A  small  fragment  of  a  lower  jaw  with  teeth,  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  in 
the  Bridger  Tertiary  formation,  is  represented  in  Figs.  38,  39,  Plate  XXVII, 
magnified  three  diameters.  In  every  respect  it  agrees  with  the  correspond- 
ing part  of  tlie  jaw  of  tlie  living  chameleons,  but^  indicates  a  much  larger 
species.  In  a  space  of  5  lines  the  alveolar  border  is  occupied  by  eight  teeth 
successively  increasing  in  size  from  Ijefore  backward. 

The  teeth  are  laterally  compressed  conical,  with  the  borders  in  front  and 
behind  somewhat  extended  and  acute,  and  at  the  base  produced  into  a  minute 
denticle.  Externally  the  bases  of  the  teeth  are  separated  by  perpendicular 
furrows  descending  on  the  face  of  the  jaw  to  the  position  of  a  finely  perforate 
horizontal  line.  Beneath  the  bases  of  the  teeth  internally  there  is  a  wider 
and  more  conspicuous  horizontal  and  perforated  groove.  Below  this,  toward 
the  rounded  base  of  the  jaw,  the  usual  Meckelian  groove  is  situated.  The 
outer  face  of  the  jaw  exhibits  two  vasculo-neural  foramina.  The  depth  of 
the  lower  jaw  from  the  point  of  the  last  tooth  of  the  specimen  is  2  J  lines. 

FISHES. 

The  remains  of  fishes  in  the  Bridger  beds  are  not  so  abundant  as  one  might 
have  supposed  from  the  nature  of  their  composition  and  the  conditions  of  their 
origin.  Nevertheless,  it  is  probable  that  fishes  were  abundant  in  genera, 
species,  and  individuals  in  the  great  Uintah  Lake  and  its  tributaries,  whose  de- 
posits form  the  Bridger  beds.  The  same  circumstances  which  removed  the 
less  coherent  parts  of  the  skeleton  from  the  interior  of  the  many  turtles,  and 
likewise  scattered  the  bones  of  these  and  of  the  multitude  of  other  reptiles 
and  of  mammals,  no  doubt  served  to  destroy  the  more  delicate  strncture  of 
the  fishes  and  to  distribute  their  hard  parts  through  the  mud.  It  is  probable 
that  future  explorations  may  lead  to  the  discovery  of  some  strata  of  the  Bridger 
beds  in  which  well-preserved  forms  of  fishes  may  exist  like  those  found  in  the 
shales  of  the  deeper  beds  of  Green  River. 

The  remains  of  fishes  from  the  Bridger  beds,  which,  with  few  exceptions, 
were  found  by  Dr.  Carter  and  submitted  to  my  examination,  consist  mainly  of 
smoothly  enameled  ganoid  scales,  a  few  isolated  specimens  of  vertebral  centra, 
portions  of  spinous  raj^s,  and  fragments  of  jaws  with  tcetli.  My  means  of 
comparison  of  these  specimens  with  the  skeletons  of  recent  fishes  are  ex- 


185 

ceediiigly  meager,  but  they  indicate  forms  wliich  generally  appear  to  he  most 
nearly  related  with  our  mud-tishes,  (^Aniia,)  and  the  gars,  {Lepidosteus,) 

Professor  Marsh  (Proceedings  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of 
Philadelphia,  1871,  p.  105)  has  already  noticed  specimens  from  the  same 
locality,  which  he  refers  to  two  species  of  Amia  about  the  size  of  A.  calva, 
and  two  species  of  Lepidosteus  about  the  same  .size  as  the  modern  gar-pike. 

AMIA. 

Amia  (Peotamia)  uintaensis. 

A  number  of  specimens,  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  on  the  l:)uttes  about  ten 
miles  from  Dry  Creek  Canon,  indicate  a  large  fish  related  with  the  modern 
Amia,  but  exhibiting  sufficient  peculiarity  to  pertain  to  a  different  genus,  for 
which  the  name  of  Protamia  has  been  proposed. 

Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  XXXII,  represent  one  of  the  best-preserved  specimens,  a 
vertebral  centrum  from  the  fore  part  of  the  dorsal  series.  Its  breadth  is  con- 
siderably gi-eater  in  proportion  with  its  length  than  in  Amia;' it  is  more 
prominent  below  ;  has  a  different  transverse  outline;  has  shorter  parapophyses, 
which  also  spring  from  a  higher  position  at  the  sides,  and  the  bottom  of  the 
articular  cones  is  situated  considerably  above  the  centre. 

The  centrum  is  nearly  tour  times  the  width  and  three  times  the  height  of 
its  length.  It  is  slightly  curved  from  side  to  side  with  the  convexity  directed 
forward.  It  is  widest  at  the  upper  third,  opposite  the  origin  of  the  para- 
pophyses, and  is  shortest  at  the  sides  intermediately. 

The  articular  cones  have  their  bottom  considerably  above  the  center,  and 
are  more  minutely  perforate  for  the  notochord  than  in  Amia. 

The  sides  of  the  centrum  are  concave  between  the  pi'ominent  articular 
margins,  and  slant  in  a  nearly  straight  line  to  the  ridges  defining  the  narrow 
inferior  surface.  The  latter  is  concave,  and  the  lateral  ridges  are  obtuse,  and 
excavated  in  an  oblong  shallow  fossa  at  their  fore  part. 

The  upper  part  of  the  centrum  is  transversely  convex  between  the  jtara- 
pophyses.  The  articular  fossas  for  the  contiguous  neural  arches,  as  in  Amia, 
are  in  the  form  of  the  figure  of  8,  and  their  internal  prominent  borders  form 
the  lateral  limits  of  the  bottom  of  the  neural  canal. 

The  parapophyses  are  short,  stout  processes  projecting  above  the  middle 
of  the  centrum  from  its  widest  part,  and  on  a  line  with  the  bottom  ol    tlic 
articular  cones. 
24  G 


186 
The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows: 

Liues. 

Lcngtli  of  ceuti'um  iiifeiioily 5.  C 

Height  of  ceutrum  auteriorly 15. 5 

Width  of  centrum  iu  line  with  the  parapophyses 20. 0 

Another  specimen  from  the  same  locality  as  the  preceding  is  represented 
in  Figs.  3,  4,  Plate  XXXII.  It  appears  to  be  the  centrum  of  an  atlas,  and 
may  probably  belong  to  the  same  species  as  the  former,  though,  judging  from 
its  difterent  aspect,  to  a  ditfereut  individual. 

The  centrum  is  transversely  oval  and  slightly  curved,  with  the  convexity 
of  the  curve  directed  forward  Its  breadth  is  two  and  a  half  times  the  height, 
and  over  live  times  the  length. 

The  anterior  sui-face  is  nearly  flat  and  somewhat  uneven,  and  just  above 
the  center  is  depressed  into  a  concave  pit  about  one-fifth  the  diameter  of  the 
centrum.  The  posterior  surface  presents  the  usual  cone  with  its  l)ot- 
tom  just  above  the  center. 

The  sides  of  the  centrum  are  concave  between  the  articular  borders,  and 
bear  no  trace  of  parapophyses.  The  lower  part  is  more  flat,  and  presents  a 
shallow  fossa  on  each  side  of  a  median  concavity.  The  fossae  for  the  neural 
arch  are  quite  prominent  at  their  contiguous  borders. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Length  of  centrum  inferiorly 4 

Height  of  centrum  anteriorly 14 

Breadth  of  ceutrum  at  middle 22 

A  third  specimen,  from  the  same  locality,  less  well  preserved,  resembles 
the  first  one,  and  belonged  apparently  to  a  somewhat  smaller  individual.  Its 
parapophyses  barely  project  beyond  the  sides,  and  are  hollowed  at  the  end. 
The  ridges  defining  the  inferior  surface  from  the  concave  sides  are  barely 
excavated. 

Its  measurements  are  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Length  of  centrum  inferiorly 5. 5 

Height  of  centrum  auteriorly 15. 5 

Breadth  of  ceutrum  at  the  upper  third 18. 25 

A  series  of  three  specimens,  witii  a  portion  of  another,  from  the  same 
locality  as  the  preceding,  appear  to  correspond  with  the  anterior  vertebrae  of 
Araia  from  the  second  to  the  fifth  inclusive.  The  fragment  resembles  the 
lateral  half  of  the  atlas  above  described,  but  is  bi-concave.  The  other  speci- 
mens resemble  the  first  and  third  ones  above  descril)e(l  in   the  form  of  the 


187 

centrum.  In 'the  third  vertebra  the  parapopliyses  arc  higli  up,  as  in  the  iirst- 
described  specimen.  In  the  succeeding  two  they  spring  Ironi  near  the  middle 
of  the  sides  of  the  centrum. 

The  measurements  of  the  second  cervical  are  as  follows : 

LineB- 

Length  of  centrum  inferiorly 4 

Depth  of  centrum  anteriorly i;j 

Breadth  of  centrum  at  middle 20 

.     The  measurements  of  the  fifth  vertebra  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Length  of  centrum  inferiorly  3. 6 

Depth  of  centrum  anteriorly .     12. 0 

Breadth  of  centrum  at  middle,  ou  line  with  parapophyaes 17. 0 

A  series  of  three  posterior  dorsal  centra,  from  the  same  locality  as  the 
preceding  specimens,  perhaps  belong  to  the  same  species,  but,  from  their 
appearance,  most  probably  to  another  individual.  They  are  somewhat  dis- 
torted from  pressure,  and  appear  in  the  original  condition  closely  to  have 
resembled  corresponding  vertebrae  of  Amia^calva,  but  are  nearly  three  times 
the  breadth,  and  scarcely  twice  the  length. 

The  three  specimens  together,  represented  in  Fig.  5,  measure  16  lines  in 
length. 

The  anterior  of  the  three  presents  the  following  measurements  : 

Lines. 

Length  of  centrum  inferiorly 5 

Depth  of  centrum  anteriorly 11 

Breadth  of  centrum  inferiorly,  opposite  the  diapophyses 14 

A  specimen  from  Dry  Creek,  consisting  of  a  mutilated  basi-occipital,  about 
the  size  of  that  of  the  alHgator-gar,  ditfers  considerably  as  well  as  from  that 
of  the  mud-fish.  It  is  represented  in  Figs.  6,  6",  and  may  perhaps  belong  to 
Protamia. 

The  articular  conical  cup  has  its  acute  margin  scolloped,  as  seen  in  Fig.  6. 
The  deep  median  groove  on  the  under  part  of  the  bone  in  Amia  and  Lepi- 
dosteus  reaches  the  articular  margin,  but  in  the  fossil,  stops  the  fourth  of  an 
inch  short  of  it.  On  each  side  of  the  bone  at  the  articular  margin  correspontiing 
with  the  lateral  notch  there  is  a  conspicuous  fossa  not  seen  in  the  genera  just 
named.  In  advance  of  the  fossa  on  each  side  of  the  median  groove  there  is 
a  broad,  slanting,  flat  surface,  longitudinally  ridged,  of  which  there  is  likewise 
no  exact  counterpart  in  Lepidosteus,  but  appears  to  correspond  with  a  smooth 
surface  occupying  the  same  position  in  Amia. 


188 

Amia  (Peotamia)  media.  • 

Figs.  7  to  9  represent  a  vertebral  centrum,  obtained  at  the  junction  of  the 
Sandy  and  Grreen  Rivers,  during  Professor  Hayden's  expedition  of  1870.  In 
its  form  and  proportions  it  resemJiles  a  centrum  from  near  the  fore  part  of 
the  dorsal  series  of  Amia  calva,  but  pertainetl  to  a  species  double  the  size. 
It  presents  several  peculiarities  which  render  it  probable  that  it  belongs  to  a 
related  genus.  The  sides  of  the  centrum  ai-e  less  contracted  than  in  Amia, 
and  the  pair  of  ridges  beneath  are  substituted  by  a  pair  of  oval  pits.  The 
parapophyses  project  transversely  just  above  the  middle,  and  are  very  short. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows: 

Lines. 

Leugtb  of  ceutrum  inferiorly 5. 5 

Height  of  centrum 10. 2 

Breadth  of  centrum 1.3. 0 

Figs.  10,  11  represent  a  vertebral  centrum,  found  by  Dr.  Carter  on  Dry 
Creek.  It  resembles  a  centrum  of  Amia  calva  from  the  back  of  the  dorsal 
series,  but  is  double  the  size.  It  presents  beneath  a  pair  of  grooved  ridges, 
as  in  A.  calva. 

The  specimen  measures  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Length  of  centrum  inferioi'ly 4. 0 

Height  of  centrum 7.  G 

Breadth  of  centrum 8. 6 

Amia  (Protamia)  gracilis. 

Figs.  23,  24,  Plate  XXXII,  represent  a  vertebral  centrum  found  by  Dr. 
Cai'ter,  together  with  a  number  of  ganoid  scales,  opposite  the  second  cross- 
ing of  Henry's  Fork  of  Green  River.  The  centrum  has  a  different  color  from 
the  scales,  and  clearly  did  not  belong  to  the  same  fish.  It  is  from  near  the 
middle  of  the  dorsal  series,  and  pertained  to  a  smaller  species  than  Amia 
calva  The  two  ridges  beneath  the  centra  of  the  latter  are  substituted  by 
^two  oblong  fossae. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows: 

Lines. 

Length  of  vertebral  centrum  inferiorly     1. 8 

Height  of  vertebral  centrum 3.  -t 

Breadth  of  vertebral  centrum 3. 8 


189 

HYPAMIA. 

Hypamia  elegans. 

Figs.  19  to  22,  Plate  XXXII,  represent  a  vertebral  centrum,  found  hy  Dr. 
Carter  on  Dry  Creek.  It  is  from  near  the  middle  of  the  dorsal  series,  and 
evidently  indicates  a  genus  distinct  from  but  nearly  related  with  Amia.  As 
in  this,  the  cenlrum  is  short  in  proportion  with  its  breadth,  and  it  presents 
sutural  impressions  for  a  contiguous  pair  of  neural  arches.  The  articular 
cups  have  their  bottom  central  and  minutely  perforate.  The  sides  below  the 
parapophyses  are  concave,  and  converge  to  a  median  prominence,  which  is 
excavated  into  a  pair  of  fossas,  separated  only  by  a  linear  partition.  The 
l)arapopliyses  ai'e  cylindroid  and  comparatively  short. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Length  of  centrum  iuferiorly  2.  li 

Depth  of  centrum  anteriorly (i.  5 

Breadth  of  centrum  anteriorly 7.  (5 

Breadth  of  centrum,  including  parapophyses 8. 5 

The  specimen  indicates  a  species  about  one-third  larger  than  Amia  calva. 

LEPIDOSTEUS. 
Lepidosteus  ateox. 

During  Professor  Hayden's  expedition  of  1870,  James  Stevenson  collected 
a  number  of  remains  of  tishesat  the  junction  of  Big  Sandy  and  Green  Rivers, 
Wyoming.  The  specimens  consist  of  isolated  vertebral  centra,  ganoid  scales, 
and  portions  of  jaws  with  teeth,  all  of  a  black  hue.  Among  them  are  several 
vertebrae  indicating  an  extinct  species  of  gar  larger  than  the  existing  alliga- 
tor-gar, Lepidosteus  ferox. 

Figs.  14,  15,  Plate  XXXII,  represent  the  centrum  of  a  vertebra  from  a 
position  in  advance  of  the  middle  of  the  dorsal  series.  The  length  of  the 
centrum  is  not  greater  than  the  breadth.  The  extremities  are  hexaliedral  in 
outline.  The  under  surface  is  flat,  and  ornate  with  longitudinal  and  somewhat 
reticular  wrinkles.  The  sides  beneath  the  pai-apophyses  are  impressed  into 
a  deep  fossa.  The  neurapophyses  are  likewise  impressed  at  the  sides  with  a 
deep  fossn,  and  a  second  deep  pit  occupies  a  position  just  behind  and  above 
tlu!  parapophyses.  These  appear  rather  narrower  than  in  the  alligator-gar, 
atnl  are  less  anterior  in  [tosition. 


190 
The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Length  of  centrum  iuferiorly  . .    8. 6 

Breadth  of  ceutrum  posteriorly 8.  G 

Height  of  ceutrum  i)osteriorly  —  , CO 

Another  specunen,  consisting  of  a  caudal  centrum,  perhaps  belongs  to  the 
same  species.  It  has  about  the  same  length  as  the  preceding,  and  is  hexa- 
gonal in  outline  at  the  ends.  Its  sides  present  a  strong  longitudinal  ridge 
separating  a  deep  fossa  below  from  another  above. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Length  of  centrum  interiorly 8. 4 

Breadth  of  centrum  posteriorly 4. 4 

Height  of  centrum  ijosteriorly 4. 8 

Lepidosteus ? 

Accompanying  the  preceding  specimens  there  are  two  vertebrae  of  another 
species  of  Lepidosteus.  One  of  them  is  a  posterior  dorsal  centrum,  and  is 
represented  in  Figs.  IG,  17.  It  is  about  as  long  as  the  corresponding  centra 
of  the  gar-pike,  Lepidosteus  osseus,  but  is  ^jroportionately  broader  and  more 
robust.  Its  articular  ends  are  hexahedral,  with  the  upper  and  lower  borders 
slightly  emarginate.  The  lower  surface  of  the  centrum  is  nearly  flat,  nearly 
level,  contracted  at  its  anterior  third,  and  deeply  grooved  along  the  middle. 
It  is  bounded  by  ridges  defining  it?  from  the  deeply  impressed  sides. 

The  other  specimen  is  the  centrum  of  a  caudal  nearly  as  long  as  the  former, 
but  narrower  in  proportion  with  its  difference  of  position  in  the  series. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimens  are  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Length  of  dorsal  centrum  iuferiorly 5. 4 

Length  of  caudal  centrum  iuferiorly , 5. 0 

Breadth  of  dorsal  centrum  posteriorly 5.4 

Breadth  of  caudal  centrum  posteriorly 3. 0 

Height  of  dorsal  centrum  posteriorly 4.2 

Height  of  caudal  centrum  posteriorly 3. 2 

These  specimens  may,  perhaps,  belong  to  one  of  the  species  indicated  by 
Professor  Marsh. 

Figs.  27  to  30  represent  several  ganoid  scales,  accompanying  the  preceding 
specimens,  which  probably  pertain  to  the  smaller  of  the  two  Lepidostei. 
They  are  covered  \\itli  perfectly  smooth,  shining  ganoine  without  markings. 

Fig.  25  represents  a  fragment  of  the  fore  part  of  the  right  ramus  of  the 
lower  jaw  accompanying  the  former  specimens.     Its  construction  is  similar 


191 

to  the  corresponding  part  in  the  alligator-gar,  but  is  proportionately  not  so 
tliick  or  rolnist  near  the  sympiiysial  end.  The  lower  surface  is  reticulated 
with  round  meshes,  and  the  ridges  of  the  net  are  ornate  with  shining  trans- 
lucent tubercles. 

The  dental  groove  exhibits  the  remains  of  a  row  of  large  teeth,  of  which 
one  retained  exhibits  the  same  cliaracter  as  those  of  the  living  gars.  The 
outer  edge  of  the  groove  was  also  furnished  with  minute  teeth,  but  the  inner 
edge  exhibits  no  trace  of  these  organs. 

Lepidosteus  simplex. 

Some  remains  of  a  Lepidosteus,  together  with  some  fragments  of  a  turtle- 
shell,  were  collected  near  Washakie  Station,  Wyoming,  by  James  Stevenson, 
during  Professor  Hayden's  exi^loration  of  1870.  The  remains  of  the  Lepidos- 
teus consist  of  a  mutilated  basi-occipital  and  three  succeeding  vertebral  cen- 
tra, together  with  several  small  jaw-fragments  and  a  number  of  large  ganoid 
scales. 

The  basi-occipital  and  vertebral  centra,  represented  in  Fig.  18,  Plate 
XXXII,  resemble  in  form  and  proportions  those  of  alligator-gar,  but  an; 
smaller. 

A  tooth,  represented  in  Fig.  26,  contained  in  one  of  the  jaw-fragments 
agrees  in  character  with  the  larger  teeth  of  living  gars.  The  outer  edge  of 
the  same  jaw-fragment  is  furnished  with  smaller  and  more  curved  teeth  of 
the  same  kind. 

Figs.  31,  32  represent  two  lozenge-shaped  scales  of  less  In'cadth  but  thicker 
than  those  of  the  alligator-gar.  The  enamel  surface  is  flat,  smooth,  and 
highly  polished,  and  exhibits  no  markings  except  one  or  several  minute  puncta 
near  the  center. 

Fig.  33  represents  a  similar  scale,  which  appears  to  be  traversed  lijre  and 
aft  by  a  canal  communicating  by  a  sliort  cleft  with  the  outer  surface.  The 
cleft  is  directed  backward,  and  is  protected  by  an  angular  elevation  of  the 
anterior  border. 

Fig.  34  represents  another  scale  of  a  different  form,  probal)!y  from  I  he 
median  line  of  the  back. 

The  measurements  of  the  basi-occipital  and  vcrteljral  centra  are  as  follows  : 

Liues. 

Breadth  of  the  articulation  of  the  basi-occipital 10. 0 

Height  irom  lower  groove  to  ed^e  of  occipital  foi'amen ").  0 

Length  of  first  vertebral  ceutriiui -1. 0 


192 

Lines. 

Breadth  of  first  vertebral  centrum 10. 0 

LcDgtli  of  secoud  vertebral  ceutrum 4. 4 

Breadth  of  secoud  vertebral  centrum 7. 6 

Length  of  third  vertebral  centrum 5. 0 

Breadth  of  third  vertebral  ceutrum  6. 8 

A  number  of  large  ganoid  scales,  of  the  same  character  as  the  preceding, 
were  collected  in  a  sandstone  stratum  on  Little  Sandy  Creek,  during  Pro- 
fessor Hayden's  expedition  of  1870.  Several  of  these  selected  from  the  collec- 
tion are  represented  in  Figs.  35  to  38. 

A  number  of  similar  scales  were  obtained  by  Dr.  Carter  in  the  vicinity 
of  Fort  Bridger.  Figs.  39  to  42  represent  several  of  the  scales  selected  from 
the  collection. 

Fig.  43  represents  a  scale  of  a  Lepidosteus  found  in  association  with  the 
large  saber-like  canines  described  in  the  preceding  pages,  and  supposed  to 
belong  to  Uintatherium. 

Lepidosteus  notabilis. 

A  vertebral  centrum  partially  imbedded  in  a  yellowish  sandstone  contain- 
ing casts  of  shells  was  obtained  near  Washakie,  Wyoming,  during  Professor 
Hayden's  exploration  of  1870. 

The  centrum  is  represented  in  Figs.  12,  13,  and  appears  to  indicate  a  fish 
related  with  Lepidosteus,  but  probably  of  a  ditfereilt  genus.  It  pertains  to 
an  anterior  dorsal,  and  is  about  the  size  of  a  corresponding  centrum  of  the 
alligator-gar,  but  has  the  parapophyses  much  shorter.  The  centrum  also 
differs  in  shape  from  those  of  the  alligator-gar.  The  lower  surface  is  broad 
and  flat,  and  is  marked  with  longitudinal  curved  and  furcate  ridges.  The  sides 
are  perpendicular  and  depressed  in  a  deep  fossa  beneath  the  parapophyses 
In  tiie  alligator-gar  the  sides  slant  outwardly  from  the  lower  surface. 

The  posterior  end  of  the  centrum  of  the  fossil  is  four-sided,  with  the 
widest  border  above  and  convex,  the  shortest  below  and  straight,  and  the 
lateral  borders  slanting  with  a  slight  sigmoid  course. 

The  short  parapophyses  project  from  the  upper  part  of  the  centrum  nearly 
from  the  middle. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows : 

Lines 

Length  of  centrum  inferiorly 8 

Height  of  centrum  posteriorly 9 

Breadth  of  ceutrum  at  upper  part 10 

Breadth  of  ceutvum  at  lower  part- 6 

Breadth  of  ceutrum,  iuchuling  parapophyses 13 


193 
PIMELODUS. 

PiMELODUS  ANTIQUUS. 

Among  the  fossil-fish  lemaiiis  of  Professor  tiaydcn's  colleotioii  from  Uic 
junction  of  the  Big  Sandy  and  Green  Rivers,  there  are  a  iiumher  of  fragments 
of  pectoral  spines  and  a  few  jaw-fragments  of  a  species  of  cat-tish. 

The  pectoral  spines,  of  which  two  fragments  are  represented  in  Figs.  44, 
45,  Plate  XXXII,  are  like  those  of  our  living  cat-fisii.  A  fragment  compris- 
ing about  two-thirds  of  the  symphysial  portion  of  a  dcntary  bone.  Fig.  46,  re- 
sembles the  same  in  the  recent  cat-fish,  and,  as  in  it,  was  covered  with  a  l)n)a(l 
card-like  surface  of  teeth.  The  breadth  of  the  dentary  surfiice  near  the  sym- 
physis is  3^  lines.  The  pectoral  spines  have  ranged  from  an  inch  to  upward 
of  2  inches  in  length.     The  size  of  the  specie    was  from  a  foot  to  18  inclies. 

PHAREODUS. 

PlIAEEODUS    ACUTUS. 

Accompanying  the  remains  of  gars  and  cat-fish,  from  i\\{-  junction  of  lh<' 
Big  Sandy  and  Green  Rivers,  there  are  many  fragments  of  jaw-l)oncs  and 
others  with  teeth,  evidently  not  belonging  to  either  of  those  genera  of  fislies. 
They  also  present  sufficient  peculiarity  to  render  it  jirobable  that  they  may 
not  belong  in  the  same  family  with  Amia,  and  therefore  jiroljably  not  to  thc! 
closely  allied  genera  supposed  to  be  indicated  by  the  vertebral  specimens 
described  in  the  preceding  pages.  The  means  of  comparison  at  my  command 
are  too  scanty  to  enable  me  to  determine  the  affinities  of  the  fish  to  which 
the  fossils  pertain. 

Figs.  49,  50,  Plate  XXXII  represent  two  of  the  best  preserved  and  more 
characteristic  of  the  specimens,  consisting  of  fragments  of"  dentary  bones. 
These  are  proportionately  deeper  and  stronger  than  in  Amia.  Tliey  su])])oi'f 
a  single  row  of  long  teeth  at  the  border,  and  possess  no  patch  of  smaller 
teeth  internally  such  as  exist  in  Amia.  The  teeth  are  cylindro-conical,  witii 
their  somewhat  thickened  liases  close  together  and  firmly  co-ossified  with  the 
jaw.  Tlieir  shaft  is  straight  and  not  curved  as  in  Amia,  l)ut  thc  sharp  coni- 
cal apex  is  bent  inwardly. 

Figs.  47,  48  represent  fragments  of  prcmaxillaries.  In  these  the  iccWi 
are  of  the  same  character  as  in  thc  dentary  bones,  Ijul  are  less  beni  at  tlic 
tips. 


•JF, 


)   c. 


104 


Fig.  51  represents  what  1  suppose  to  be  a  fragment  of  a  maxillary  ol'  the 
same  fish.  It  is  provided  with  teeth  as  in  Amia,  Salmo,  and  some  other 
genera. 

Associated  with  the  specimens  of  the  character  above  described  thei-e  are, 
a  number  of  others,  consisting  of  small  fragments  of  bones  with  close  patches 
of  short  conical  teeth,  like  the  vomerine  and  other  similar  patches  of  teeth  of 
Amia. 

The  dentary  fragment  of  Fig.  49  contains  the  remains  of  a  dozen  teeth  in 
the  space  of  11  lines.  The  specimen  of  Fig.  50  contained  thirteen  teeth  within 
a  space  of  10  lines  from  the  symphysis.  Of  the  retained  teeth  the  last  is  the 
longest,  and  measures  nearly  3  hnes.  The  others  are  about  2J  lines  in  length. 
The  premaxillary  fragment  of  Fig.  48  contained  seven  teeth  in  a  space  of  as 
many  lines.  The  first  tooth  is  the  longest,  and  measures  2f  lines.  In 
the  other  fragment  of  Fig.  47,  ten  teeth  occupied  a  space  of  8J  lines. 

The  genus  supposed  to  be  indicated  by  the  specimens  has  been  named  from 
the  light-house-like  form  of  the  teeth. 

EEMAINS  OF  FISHES  FROM  THE  SHALES  OF  GREEN  RIVER,  WYOMING. 

In  Professor  Hayden's  Preliminary  Report  on  the  Geology  of  Wyoming 
for  1870,  p.  142,  the  author  remarks  that  soon  after  leaving  Rock  Springs 
Station,  on  the  Union  Pacific  Railroad,  the  Green  River  group  is  seen  on  the 
bluff  hills  on  either  side  of  the  road  to  the  entrance  of  Bitter  Creek  into 
Green  River.  In  the  valley  of  the  latter  remarkal)le  sections  of  strata 
are  exposed  to  view.  The  group  he  calls  the  Green  River  shales,  because  the 
strata  are  composed  of  thin  layers,  varying  in  thickness  from  that  of  a  knife-blade 
to  several  inches.  The  rocks  all  have  a  grayish-buff  color  on  exposure,  some- 
times with  bands  of  dark  brown.  These  dai-ker  bands  are  saturated  with  a 
bituminous  matter  which  renders  them  combustible. 

About  two  miles  west  of  Rock  Springs  Station  there  is  an  excavation  on 
the  railroad  which  has  been  called  the  Petrified  Fish  Cut,  on  account  of  the 
thousands  of  beautiful  and  perfect  fossil-fishes  which  are  found  on  the  surface 
of  the  thin  shales,  sometimes  a  dozen  or  more  on  an  area  of  a  square  foot. 
Remains  of  insects  und  aquatic  plants  are  also  found  in  the  shales,  and  in  one 
instance  a  well-preserved  portion  of  a  feather  of  a  bird  was  discovered. 

A  large  collection  of  fossil-fishes  from  the  Petrified  Fish  Cut,  obtained  I)y 
Professor  Ilaydcn  in  1;)70,  was  subinilted  to  Professor  Cope,  who  has  described 
tiie  different  forms  in  tlir  i('[»orl  al)ove   mentioned. 


195 

The  first  of  the  fossil-fishes  of  the  Green  River  shales  was  discovered  by 
the  late  Dr.  John  Evans  as  early  as  185G,  and  was  submitted  to  the  examina- 
tion of  the  writer.  Several  specimens,  both  of  the  bufi'-colored  and  dark 
bituminous  shales,  containing  fossil-fishes,  have  been  presented  to  me  by 
Judge  W.  A.  Carter  and  Dr.  J.  Van  A.  Carter,  of  Fort  Bridger,  Wyoming. 

Professor  Cope  describes  seven  species,  including  one  of  those  described 
by  me,  from  the  Green  River  shales.  Two  are  named  Clupea  himulis  and 
C.  pusilla,  and  a  third  Osteoglossum  encaustum.  The  others  are  referred  to 
two  extinct  genera  with  the  names  of  Asineops  squamifrons  and  A.  viridensis, 
Erismatopterus  Rickseckeri  and  E.  levatus. 

CLUPEA. 

Clupea  humilis. 

The  species  was  originally  described  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy 
of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia  for  1856,  page  256.  It  was  indicated 
from  a  specimen  consisting  of  an  impression  of  a  nearly  complete  fish  in  a 
l)iece  of  shale,  which  looks  like  one-half  of  a  rounded,  water-worn  fragnuMit. 
The  fossil  was  found  by  Dr.  Evans  on  Green  River,  and  was  stated  by  him 
to  have  been  derived  from  the  Tertiary  rocks  of  that  locality.  The  fish  is 
represented  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  XVII,  of  the  natural  size.  It  has  the  ordinary 
form  of  living  species  of  herring,  and  presents  the  characters  of  the  genus. 

This  small  herring  in  its  total  length  has  measured  about  3^  inches.  The 
back  is  slightly  arched,  and  the  dorsal  fin  is  situated  just  in  advance  of  the 
middle.  The  ventral  border  is  strongly  arched,  and  is  rather  abruptly  nar- 
rowed from  the  anus.  The  ventral  fins  are  placed  beneath  ihc  back  of  the 
middle  of  the  dorsal  fin.  The  head  is  pointed.  The  tail  is  deeply  forked, 
and  its  pedicle  is  rather  narrow. 

The  number  of  vertebras  appears  to  be  about  thirty-four,  of  which  at  least 
twenty  are  dorsal,  tlie  remainder  caudal.  The  notochord  appears  to  liave 
extended  continuously  through  the  perfoi'ated  vertebral  bodies. 

The  depth  of  the  l)ody  at  the  fore  part  of  the  dorsal  fin  is  four  and  a  luilf 
times  less  than  the  length.  The  length  of  the  head  slightly  exceeds  the 
depth  of  the  body.     The  eyes  are  large. 

The  pectoral  fins  are  destroyed,  but  their  connection  with  tli(^  body  was 
just  below  the  position  of  the  operculum.  Tlie  ventral  liiis  ('(nilaiii  seven 
rays. 


196 

The  dorsal'  fin  appears  to  have  had  thirteen  rays,  of  which  the  second  was 
the  longest,  and  from  which  the  others  gradually  decreased.  The  anal  fin 
contains  fourteen  rays.  The  caudal  fin  between  its  two  extreme  outer  and 
longest  rays,  inclusive  of  these,  appears  to  possess  twenty  rays. 

The  ventral  carinated  spines  are  twenty-five.  Accessory  ribs  project  from 
the  vertebrae  and  ordinary  ribs  in  the  usual  manner  in  the  herrings. 

Measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Total  length  of  tbe  fish io 

Length  to  commeucement  of  the  tail 34 

Depth  of  body  in  front  of  dorsal  fin 10 

Deiith  at  anus 0 

Length  of  the  head lOi 

Depth  of  the  head 8:^ 

Length  of  the  tail lo" 

Depth  of  iiedicle  of  the  tail 4 

Distance  from  snout  to  couiinenceiuent  of  dorsal  tin 17 

Distance  from  snout  to  anus    27 

Clupea  alta. 

A  slab  of  shale  obtained  from  the  so-called  "  Petrified  Fish  Cut,''  and  sub- 
mitted to  my  examination,  contains  ten  herrings,  in  which  the  bones  and 
scales  are  preserved,  and  stained  of  a  dark-brown  hue.  The  vertebrae,  where 
broken,  exhibit  the  position  of  a  continuous  notochord  occupied  by  hyaline 
chalcedony  that  looks  like  the  original  substance  of  the  latter  itself  The 
most  complete  and  largest  of  the  fossil-fishes  is  represented  of  the  natural 
size  in  Fig.  2,  Plate  XVII. 

These  fishes  appear  to  ])elong  to  a  different  species  of  herring  from  the 
former,  especially  distinguished  hy  the  greater  proportionate  depth  of  the 
body  and  the  more  arched  dorsal  l)order.  In  most  other  essential  character's 
the  two  appear  to  agree.  It  has  the  same  number  of  vertebras  and  of  ventral 
carinated  spines.  The  fins  also,  so  far  as  can  be  determined,  appear  to  con- 
tain the  same  number  of  rays. 

The  other  specimens  on  the  slab,  though  smaller,  exhil)it  the  same,  or 
nearly  the  same,  proportionate  depth  of  the  body. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  figured  are  as  follows: 

Liiu^s. 

Total  length  of  the  fish bO 

Length  to  commencement  of  tail 38 

Depth  of  body  in  front  of  dorsal  tin Hi 


197 

Lines. 

Depth  at  anus 91 

Length  of  head 12 

Depth  of  head 10^ 

Length  of  tail 11 

Depth  of  iiedicle  of  tail 5 

Distance  from  snout  to  coiuinencemeut  of  dorsal  fin 20J 

Distance  from  snout  to  anus 31 


DESCRIPTION  OF  REMAINS  OF  MAMMALS  FROM  THE  TERTIARY 
FORMATION  OF  SWEETWATER  RIVER,  WYOMING. 


A  small  collection  of  fossils,  consisting  of  the  remains  of  mammals,  was 
obtained,  during  Professor  Hayden's  expedition  of  1870,  on  Sweetwater 
River,  eighteen  miles  west  of  Devil's  Gate,  Wyoming. 

Professor  Hayden,  in  his  Preliminary  Report  of  the  Geological  Snrvey 
of  Wyoming,  1871,  page  32,  in  relation  to  the  locality  whence  the  fossils 
were  obtained,  makes  the  following  remarks :  "  Near  Cloven  Peak,  fifteen 
miles  west  of  Devil's  Gate,  there  are  some  bluff-banks  on  the  south  side 
of  the  Sweetwater,  about  one  hundred  feet  high,  which  indicate  the  exist- 
ence of  quite  modern  Tertiary  beds,  like  those  on  the  Niobrara  River. 
They  are  composed  of  indurated  sauds  and  marls  of  a  light-gray  or  cream 
color,  and  are  in  appearance  precisely  like  those  seen  on  the  Laramie  River, 
and  many  other  places,  which  I  have  usually  regarded  as  of  the  Pliocene  age. 
Still  farther  to  the  westward  are  numerous  exposures  of  these  beds,  which 
are  weathered  into  the  usual  fortification-like  forms,  and  scattered  around 
their  base  are  large  numbers  of  remains  of  extinct  mammals  and  turtles, 
apjjarently  identical  with  those  found  on  the  Niobrara.  They  occur  in  the 
same  beautiful  state  of  preservation.'' 

Professor  Hayden's  view  of  the  age  of  the  formation  is  confirmed  l)y  the 
zoological  character  of  the  fossils,  which  are  nearly  related  with  those  from 
the  Pliocene  Tertiary  sands  of  the  Niobrara  River,  and  are,  without  doul)t, 
of  a  much  more  recent  date  than  those  of  the  Bridger  beds. 

The  specimens  sul^mitted  to  my  examination  consist  of  fragments  of  jaws 
with  teeth,  portions  of  the  larger  limb-bones,  small  bones  of  the  feet,  and  a 
few  mutilated  vertebrae.  Most  of  them  pertain  to  a  species  of  Merycochoerus, 
an  animal  nearly  related  to  Oreodon.  A  few  apparently  belonged  to  a  smaller 
species,  and  several  to  a  small  equine  animal.  The  others  remain  undeter- 
mined for  want  of  ready  means  of  comparison. 

The  fossils  are  all  isolated  specimens,  which  were  picked  up  from  the  sur- 
fixce  of  the  ground.  Usually  they  are  perfectly  free  from  adherent  matrix. 
They  are  white  in  appearance,  and  resemble  recent  bleached  bones.     They 


199 

have  losl  (licir  l)onc-cartilage,  and  arc  linnl  and  hriUlc,  Uiouii^li  not  (rialilc 
Tliey  are  nut  in  the  least  degree  water- worn,  and  present  no  appearance  ol" 
having  been  submitted  to  great  pressure,  as  is  so  Irequently  the  case  with  the 
ossils  from  the  Cretaceous  and  Eocene  formations  of  neighboring  localities. 

MAMMALIA. 

Ordiir  Ruminantia. 
MERYCOCHCERUS. 

Merycociicerus  rusticus. 

The  genus  above  named  was  originally  characterized  from  some  remains, 
discovered  by  Professor  Hayden  during  Lieutenant  Warren's  expedition  of 
1857,  in  a  bed  of  dull,  fine-grained  grit,  on  the  head-waters  of  the  Niobrara 
River,  near  Fort  Laramie,  Nebraska. 

Merycoclioerus  pertains  to  the  same  family  as  Oreodon,  a  genus  character- 
ized from  a  profusion  of  remains  from  tlie  Miocene  Tertiary  deposit  of  the 
Mauvaises  Terres  of  Wliite  River,  Dakota.  The  general  construction  and 
form  of  the  skull  appear  to  be  nearly  the  same,  and  such,  also,  is  the  case 
with  the  number,  constitution,  and  relative  position  of  the  teeth.  There  are, 
however,  certain  peculiarities  distinguishing  the  two  genera. 

The  molar  teeth  of  Oreodon  have,  comparatively  with  those  of  most  genera 
of  existing  ruminants,  short  crowns  as  in  the  deer;  and,  as  in  this,  at  matu- 
rity they  are  all  inserted  alone  by  fangs.  In  Merycochosrus  the  crowns  of 
the  molars  are  proportionately  longer,  and  in  the  mature  condition  of  the  ani- 
mal, while  the  anterior  ones  were  fully  protruded,  the  posterior  ones,  though 
in  functional  position,  were  only  partially  protruded,  and  continued  to  advance 
as  they  were  worn  away.  The  difference  between  the  two  genera,  Oreodon 
and  Merycochoerus,  in  respect  to  tlie  comparative  length  of  the  molar  crowns, 
is  like  that  existing  between  the  molars  of  the  deer  and  the  ox,  but  not  to 
the  same  degree.  While  the  condition  of  the  teeth  of  Oreodon  corresponds  to 
that  of  the  deer,  those  of  Merycochoerus  rather  hold  an  intermediate  condi- 
tion to  those  of  the  deer  and  the  ox. 

In  Oreodon,  when  the  last  of  the  molar  series  was  fully  protruded  so  as  to 
be  inserted  by  the  fangs  alone,  the  anterior  molars  might  still  be  in  a  condi- 
tion to  exhibit  very  conspicuously  the  anatomical  characters  of  tlieir  triturat- 
ing surfaces,  as  displayed  in  Plate  VII  of  tlie  Extinct  Mammalian  Fauna  of 


200 

Dakota  and  Nebraska.  In  Merycochoerus,  on  tlie  othei-  band,  lieforc  tlie 
crown  of  tbe  last  molar  was  fully  protruded,  ab'eady  tbe  anatomical  characters 
of  the  triturating  surfixces  of  those  in  advance  were,  to  some  extent,  destroyed ; 
and  in  the  case  of  tbe  first  true  molar  completely  obliterated,  in  this  state  pre- 
senting simply  a  broad  dentinal  surface  bordered  with  enamel.  This  condi- 
tion is  represented  in  the  Fig.  3,  of  Plate  X,  of  the  same  work  just  mentioned, 
though  in  this  case  the  specimen  belonged  to  an  individual  past  maturity,  and 
the  last  molar  is  fully  protruded. 

Another  distinctive  character  in  the  teeth  of  Oreodon  and  Merycochoerus  is 
expressed  in  the  less  degree  of  transverse  symmetry  of  the  crowns  of  the 
premolars  in  the  latter.  In  Oreodon  tlieir  various  measurements  are  more 
uniform,  and  the  summits  of  the  principal  constituent  lobes  of  their  crowns  are 
nearly  or  quite  median,  and  they  nearly  retained  this  relative  position  as  the 
teeth  were  worn  away.  In  Merycochoerus  the  length  and  fore  and  aft  diame- 
ter of  the  crown  exceed  the  transverse  diameter  except  in  the  last  upper  one; 
and  the  summits  of  the  lobes  of  the  premolars,  especially  in  the  upper  ones, 
are  more  or  less  in  advance  of  the  middle  of  tlie  crowns,  and  they  likewise 
retained  this  relative  position  as  the  teeth  were  worn. 

In  the  original  description  of  Merycochoerus,  its  distinction  from  Oreodon 
was  mainly  founded,  on  peculiarities  of  the  skull;  the  differences  in  the  teeth 
above  noted,  especially  those  in  the  proportionate  length  of  the  crowns  of  the 
molars,  and  their  relative  mode  of  protrusion,  were  not  recognized.  This 
want  of  appreciation  of  the  distinctive  characters  of  the  teeth  of  the  two  gen- 
era arose  from  the  observations  having  been  made  on  the  jaw-specimens  of 
Merycochoerus  advanced  beyond  maturity,  in  which  all  the  teeth  were  fully 
protruded,  and  in  this  condition  did  not  strikingly  differ  from  those  of  Oreodon. 

A  number  of  other  fossils,  discovered  by  Professor  Hayden  in  the  Pliocene 
sands  of  the  Niobrara  Valley,  and  described  by  the  writer  at  the  same  time 
as  those  referred  to  Merycochoerus,  from  the  difference  in  the  proportionate 
length  of  the  molar  teeth  in  comparison  with  those  of  Oreodon,  were  referred 
to  another  genus  with  the  name  of  Merychyus.  In  the  same  manner  this 
was  supposed  to  differ  from  the  Merycochoerus;  and  though  subsequently,  in 
the  preparation  of  the  "  Extinct  Mammalian  Fauna  of  Dakota  and  Nebraska," 
it  was  suspected  that  these  two  genera  migiit  prove  to  be  the  same,  it  was 
not  until  the  present  moment  the  suspicion  appeared  to  be  confirmed.  From 
present  observations  and  reflection,  I  am  under  the  impression  that  Oreodon 


201 

ami  Merycochoerus  are  two  quite  distinct  though  closely  allied  genera,  of 
which  the  latter  is  geologically  the  later,  and,  perhaps,  the  successor  by  evolu- 
tion from  the  former.  Merychyus  would  appear  to  be  the  same  as  Meryco- 
chojrus,  and  the  fossils  which  had  been  referred  to  it  belong  to  the  same  geo- 
logical horizon. 

Of  the  specimens  originally  attributed  to  Merychyus  major  and  M.  medius, 
too  little  of  the  corresponding  parts  were  preserved  in  such  a  condition  as  to 
enable  us  to  make  a  comparison  of  the  upjier  jaw  and  face  with  the  same 
parts  in  Merycochoerus  to  ascertain  how  far  they  are  like  one  another.  The 
position  of  the  infra-orbital  foramen,  which  appears  to  be  nearly  or  quite  con- 
stant in  a  species,  or  varies  but  slightly  in  several  species  of  a  genus,  in  the 
jaw-specimen  referred  to  Merychyus  major  is  placed  above  the  last  premolar. 
It  occupies  the  same  position  in  Merychyus  elegans ;  and  in  the  up[)er  jaw  of 
a  young  animal,  referred  to  Merychyus  Jiiedlus,  it  is  placed  aljove  the  last 
temporary  premolar,  therefore  agreeing  in  position  with  that  in  tlie  adults  of 
the  other  two  species.  In  Merycochcej-us  proprius  the  position  of  the  foramen 
is  further  back,  al)ove  the  interval  of  the  first  and  second  molars,  and  this  is, 
also,  its  position  in  the  upper  jaw  of  the  Sweetwater  species  named  Meryco- 
choerus rusticus. 

This  difference  of  position  is  probably  related  with  adiiference  in  the  shape 
of  the  face,  which  in  ]\Ierycochoerus  is  rather  abruptly  narrowed  in  advance 
of  the  zygomata,  as  in  the  hog.  The  face  of  Merychyus  I  suspect  rather  to 
1)0  more  like  that  of  Oreodon,  nari'owing  graduallj'  forward  from  the  position 
of  the  orijits  and  zygomata,  as  in  the  peccary. 

Admitting  the  three  genera,  Oreodon,  Merycochoerus,  and  Merychyus,  their 
distinctive  characters,  so  far  as  ascertained  from  the  materials  at  command, 
would  appeal'  to  be  as  follows  : 

Oreodon. — Molar  teeth  with  short  crowns,  as  in  the  deer;  and,  as  in 
this,  at  maturity  inserted  by  fangs.  Anterior  premolars  straight,  with  the 
diameters  nearly  equal,  and  with  their  points  median  or  nearly  so.  Face 
gradually  convergent,  conical.  Infra-orbital  arch  narrow  or  of  moderate 
depth;  gradually  declining  upon  the  side  of  the  face.  Infra-orbital  foramen 
small  and  situated  al)ove  the  tliird  premolar.  Nasal  orifice  nearly  as  wide  as 
high,  and  situated  immediately  above  the  incisive  alveolar  border,  as  usual  in 
most  animals.  Premaxillaries  and  maxillaries  remaining  distinct  from  one 
anotlier.  Incisive  foramina  of  moderate  size. 
•2G  G 


202 

Merycociicerus. — Crowns  of  the  molars  proportionately  longer  than  in 
Oreodon,  and  protruding  gradually  as  they  were  worn  away ;  the  anterior 
having  their  sculptured  triturating  surface  obliterated  before  the  posterior  are 
fully  protruded.  Anterior  premolars  with  the  length  and  breadth  exceeding  the 
width,  and  the  upper  ones  inclining  posteriorly,  and  with  their  points  in  advance 
of  the  middle.  Facial  cone  aliruptly  narrowed  in  advance  of  the  orbits. 
Infra-orbital  arches  deep  and  rapidly  declining  on  the  face.  Orbits  smaller 
and  more  externally  situated  than  in  Oreodon.  Infra-orbital  foramen  above 
the  interval  of  the  tirst  and  second  molars.  Nasal  orifice  situated  far  above 
the  alveolar  border,  as  in  the  tapir,  and  commencing  below  as  an  angular 
notch  of  the  premaxillaries,  which  are  firmly  co-ossified  together  and  with 
the  maxillaries.     Incisive  foramen  large. 

Meeychyus. — Teeth  as  in  Merycochoerus.  Facial  cone  intermediate  in 
character  to  the  latter  and  Oreodon  (?)  Infra- orbital  foramen  situated  above 
the  last  premolar,  or  in  a  position  intermediate  to  that  of  Oreodon  and 
Merycoehcerus. 

The  more  characteristic  of  the  remains  of  Merycochajrus,  from  the  Sweet- 
water River,  consist  of  fragments  of  jaws  with  teeth  from  perhaps  a  half 
dozen  individuals.  One  of  the  specimens  consists  of  the  greater  part  of  an 
upper  jaw,  represented  in  Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  III,  accompanied  with  a  portion 
of  the  lower  jaw,  represented  in  Fig.  3  of  tlie  same  plate. 

The  face  of  Merycochoerus,  as  indicated  by  the  upper-jaw  specimen  just 
mentioned,  would  appear  to  difter  in  a  remarkable  manner  from  that  of  the 
closely  allied  genus  Oreodon.  In  the  species  to  which  the  name  of  Merij- 
cochcerus  rusticus  has  been  given,  and  which  probably  is  the  same  as  Mery- 
chyus  medius,  the  face  is  narrowed  in  the  same  abrupt  manner  in  advance  of 
the  orbits  as  in  Merycochcems proprius.  It  is,  however,  more  convergent  than 
in  the  latter,  or  is  proportionately  less  widened  at  the  extremity. 

The  relation  of  the  orbits  and  zygomata  to  the  fore  part  of  the  face  in 
Oreodon  is  more  like  the  condition  in  the  peccary;  in  Merycochoerus  more 
like  that  in  the  hog. 

The  side  of  the  face  in  If.  rusticus  between  the  position  of  the 
orbit  and  the  prominence  produced  by  the  canine,  and  above  the  alveolar 
ridge,  is  deeply  concave,  even  more  so  proportionately  than  in  the  hog.  In 
M.  propr'ms,  it  is  not  depressed  in  this  manner,  so  that  the  side  of 
the  face  in  the  corresponding  position  is  nearly  vertical,  and  the  large  infra- 


203 

orl)ital  foramen  opens  forward  on  this  vertical  surface.  In  M.  rusticiis^  I  lie 
infra-orbital  foramen  is  also  large,  and  occupies  a  corresponding  position,  \n\i 
is  situated  in  the  concavity  of  the  side  of  the  face,  so  that  the  surface  of  the 
alveolar  border  curves  outwardly  and  downward  from  it. 

The  front  of  the  snout  or  fore  part  of  the  upper  jaw  resembles  in  its  con- 
struction the  same  part  in  the  tapir  more  than  that  of  Oi-eodon,  but,  as  in  the 
latter,  it  barely  projects  beyond  the  position  of  the  canine  alveoli.  The  pre- 
maxillaries  are  completely  co-ossified  with  each  other  and  with  the  maxillaries. 

Viewed  at  the  side,  the  fore  part  of  the  upper  jaw  is  convex  forward  and 
downward,  as  in  the  tapir.  Viewed  in  front,  (Fig.  2,  Plate  III,)  it  presents  a 
long  slope,  narrow  above,  widening  below,  depressed  toward  tiie  median  line, 
and  bounded  laterally  by  the  convex  curved  prominences  of  the  canine 
alveoli.  About  1 J  inches  above  the  alveolar  margin  the  nasal  orifice  com- 
mences in  an  angular  notch  as  in  the  tapir,  but   proportionately  less   narrow. 

Behind  the  position  of  this  nasal  notch,  bordered  by  thickened  ridges 
ascending  in  a  convergent  manner  from  the  canine  alveoli,  are  the  lateral  con- 
cavities of  the  face  before  mentioned. 

The  upper  part  of  the  face  being  broken  away,  we  can  form  no  just  idea 
of  its  character.  If  constructed  as  in  Oreodon,  by  the  conjunction  of  the 
maxillaries  along  the  course  of  the  nasals,  it  would  appear  to  be  exceedingly 
narrow,  even  less  than  half  the  width  at  the  alveolar  border.  It  would  appear 
as  if  the  construction  might  be  somewhat  similar  to  that  in  tlic  tapir,  so  that 
the  maxillaries  bounded  a  large  nasal  aperture  overhung  by  the  nasals. 

The  infra-orbital  arch  is  nearly  twice  the  depth  it  is  in  Oreodon,  and  resem- 
bles in  its  proportions  that  of  the  hog.  Its  outer  surface  is  nearly  vertical  or 
slopes  slightly  outward,  and  is  nearly  plane  or  slightly  depressed.  The  ante- 
rior zygomatic  root  is  an  unusually  prominent  process  of  tlie  maxillary.  Its 
sutui'e  of  conjunction  with  the  malar  descends  nearly  on  a  line  with  the  an- 
terior border  of  the  orbit.  The  latter  is  smaller,  and  is  situated  more  exter- 
nally than  in  Oreodon. 

Tiie  roof  of  the  mouth  is  moderately  concave,  and  the  incisive  foramen, 
apparently,  is  proj^ortionately  as  large  as  in  the  tapir. 

The  lower  jaw  of  Merycochcerus  is  like  that  of  Oreodon,  and,  as  in  this  and 
all  living  ruminants,  has  the  rami  united  by  suture. 

The  mental  foramen,  like  the  infra-orbital  foramen,  is  proportionately  larger 
than  in  Oreodon.     Perhai)s  this  difference  in  the  size  of  the  ii)ranii:)a,  tog<;ther 


204 

with  the  other  peculiarities  of  the  face,  may  indicate  that  Merycochoerus  was 
provided  with  large  prehensile  lips,  or  probably  a  short  proboscis. 

As  in  Oreodon,  the  dental  series  of  the  upper  jaw  consists  of  3  incisors,  1 
canine,  4  premolars,  and  3  molars ;  of  the  lower  jaw,  4  incisors,  1  canine,  3 
premolars,  and  3  molars. 

In  both  jaws  of  Merycochoerus,  as  in  Oreodon,  the  teeth  form  nearly  closed 
rows.  The  largest  interval  is  between  the  canine  and  first  premolar  of  the 
upjier  jaw,  to  accommodate  the  lower  canine,  which  in  all  the  Oreodont  family 
occupies  a  position  behind  the  upper  one. 

A  last  upper  incisor,  retained  in  the  upper-jaw  specimen  of  Merycochoerus 
rusticus,  resembles  in  its  form  and  relative  size  to  the  others  the  correspond- 
ing tooth  in  Merychyus  elegans. 

In  a  fragment  of  a  lower  jaw  represented  in  Fig.  5,  Plate  VII,  and  retain- 
ing most  of  the  incisors,  the  lateral  one  is  observed  to  be  much  larger  in  re- 
lation with  the  others  than  in  Oreodon.  Its  crown,  viewed  in  front,  is  nearly 
ovoid  in  outline.  Its  borders  are  acute  and  meet  in  a  rounded  point.  The 
outer  surface  is  convex.  The  inner  surface,  considerably  shorter,  is  bounded 
by  a  basal  ridge.  The  intervening  incisors,  about  half  the  size  of  the  outer 
one,  successively  but  slightly  decrease.  Their  crown  is  more  truncate  at  the 
summit,  and  the  internal  basal  ridge  is  stronger.  The  large  lateral  incisor  is 
to  be  viewed  as  a  modified  canine  in  its  relation  with  this  tooth  as  present  in 
animals  usually. 

The  canines  of  Merycochognis  in  all  respects  are  like  those  of  Oreodon. 
As  in  this  genus,  the  lower  ones  are  to  be  viewed  as  modified  first  premolars, 
assuming  the  form  and  function  of  canine  teeth,  but  still  holding  in  relation  to 
the  other  teeth  the  ordinary  position  of  the  former. 

The  crowns  of  the  premolars  of  M.  rusticus  in  their  earlier  state  are  con- 
siderably longer  proportionately  than  those  of  Oreodon,  and  by  the  time  they 
became  wholly  protruded  they  were  so  much  worn  as  to  have  the  peculiar 
construction  of  their  triturating  surface  obliterated. 

The  crowns  of  the  upper  premolars,  except  the  last  one,  have  a  backward 
inclination,  successively  increasing  from  the  third  to  the  first.  The  points 
of  these  teeth  occupy  the  anterior  third  of  the  crown  in  the  earUer  stage, 
and  at  a  late  period  become  so  advanced  as  to  appear  to  form  the  anterior 
corner  of  the  crown.  In  Oreodon  the  corresponding  teeth  are  nearly  or  quite 
straight,  and  the  summit  of  the   crown  is  median,  and  continues  so  as  the 


205 

teeth  are  worn  away.  The  difTerences  mentioned — that  is  to  sa}',  (he  back- 
ward inclination  of  the  crowns  of  the  premolars  and  the  more  advanced 
position  of  their  points  in  Merycochoerus — wouhl  appear  to  be  due  to  a  com- 
parative shortening  of  tlie  face  and  a  less  consequent  space  ti)r  the  dev(dop- 
ment  of  the  teeth. 

Tlie  same  ditierences  which  have  been  mentioned  as  existing  between  tlie 
premolars  of  Merycochceriis  rusticus  and  Oreodon  are  also  obvious  in  Mery- 
chyus  elegans.  The  same  may  be  said  also  of  the  third  upper  premolar  in 
the  fossil  referred  to  MerycJiyus  major,  except  that  in  this  the  crown  of  tlie 
tooth  is  proportionately  not  so  long  as  in  Merycochoirus.  rusticus,  and  was  less 
worn  when  fully  protruded. 

In  Merycochcerus  rusticus  the  outer  face  of  the  upper  premolars  is  convex 
longitudinally,  but  concave  transversely;  the  lateral  borders  having  a  consider- 
able degree  of  pi'ominence.  In  M.  proprius  and  Merychyus  major  they  are  like- 
wise concave  and  bordered  l)y  a  strong  basal  ridge  which  is  absent  in  Mery- 
cochoirus rusticus.  In  Merychyus  elegans  the  outer  lace  of  the  upper  pre- 
molars is  convex  transversely  as  well  as  longitudinally,  and,  as  in  the  latter,  is 
devoid  of  a  basal  ridge. 

In  a  small  fragment  of  an  upper  jaw  of  M.  rusticus,  containing  the  second 
and  third  premolars,  represented  in  Figs.  3,  4,  Plate  VII,  the  crowns  are  com- 
paratively but  little  worn  and  retain  the  characters  of  the  triturating  surface. 
These  teeth  are  of  less  breadth  in  proportion  to  their  thickness  than  in  M. 
proprius,  and  in  this  respect  are  more  like  the  corresponding  teeth  of  Oreodon. 
Their  outer  part  forms  a  strong  curve  from  the  ends  of  the  fangs  to  the  point 
of  the  crown,  of  which  about  one-fourth  externally  remains  unprotruded, 
while  it  is  fully  protruded  internally.  The  point  of  the  crown  is  at  the 
anterior  third,  and  externally  it  appears  to  be  continuous  as  part  ol"  the  an- 
terior projecting  border  of  tlie  crown.  The  inner  portion  of  the  crown  ex- 
hil)its  three  deep  recesses  inclosed  l)y  prominent  loop-like  folds.  The  pos- 
terior larger  recess  is  separated  fi-om  the  anterior  smaller  pair  by  a  ridge 
dividing  the  inner  part  of  the  outer  or  principal  lobe  of  the  crown.  A  basal 
ridge  festoons  the  posterior  internal  loop  of  the  third  premolar,  but  docs  not 
exist  in  the  second.  The  teeth  are  worn  olTin  a  slope  on  the  postero-internal 
lace  of  the  principal  lobe  of  the  crown. 


206 

These  teetli  are  sufficiently  like  the  corresponding  tooth  in  the  jaw-speci- 
men of  Merychyus  major  to  render  it  proljable  that  this  animal  may  belong  to 
the  same  genus  as  the  former. 

The  last  upper  premolar  of  McrycoclicBrus  rusticus  is  like  that  of  M.  pro- 
jjyius. 

The  superior  molars,  the  inferior  premolars  and  molars,  are  so  closely  like 
those  of  Merychyus  elegans,  that  they  may  be  considered  as  their  magnified 
representatives. 

Fig.  1,  Plate  VII,  represents  a  series  of  upper  molars  in  a  specimen  in 
which  the  last  one  has  not  more  than  two-thirds  protruded.  A  view  of  the 
outer  part  of  this  last  molar  is  introduced  in  the  representation  of  the  upper 
jaw  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  III,  so  as  to  complete  the  series  of  upper  molar  teeth. 
In  the  first  molar  the  anterior  crescentic  enamel  pit  is  observed  to  be  com- 
pletely obliterated,  and  the  posterior  one  nearly  so.  In  the  back  two  molars 
the  inuer  faces  of  the  internal  lobes  are  decidedly  concave  longitudinally. 

In  Fig.  6,  Plate  VII,  we  have  a  presentation  of  the  first  and  second 
upper  molars  of  Merycochoerus  proprius  introduced  for  comparison.  Tlie 
specimen  is  from  the  head-waters  of  the  Niobrara  River,  in  the  vicinity  of 
Fort  Laramie. 

Fig.  2,  of  the  same  plate,  represents  the  last  premolar  and  the  molar  of 
the  temporary  series  of  M.  rusticus.  The  molar  is  like  those  of  the  perma- 
nent set ;  the  premolar  resembles  the  former  modified  by  having  the  anterior 
lobes,  especially  the  inner  one,  proportionately  less  well  developed. 

In  a  small  fragment  of  an  upper  jaw  of  another  young  animal,  in  which  the 
temporary  molars  were  retained  and  the  first  permanent  moJar  had  protruded, 
the  maxillary  presents  a  different  appearance  from  that  in  the  adult.  The 
surfaces  above  and  below  the  position  of  the  ridge  produced  by  the  malar 
process  are  almost  at  a  right  angle  to  each  other.  The  upper  surface  slopes 
forward  and  outward  from  the  position  occupied  by  the  orbit,  and  upon  it 
opens  the  infra-orbital  foramen  about  half  an  inch  within  the  ridge  separat- 
ing this  sui'face  from  the  lower  one.  In  the  progress  of  development  from 
youth  to  age  the  angularity  of  the  outer  part  of  the  maxillary  became  rounded, 
so  that  the  surface  assumed  a  convex  instead  of  a  nearly  rectangular  char- 
acter. 


207 


Measuremeuts  of  the  iaws  and  teeth  of  M.  rustlcus  are  as  follows 


Distance  from  upper  inei.sors  to  back  of  last  molar 

Length  of  space  occupied  by  upper  series  of  molar  teeth  . . . 

Length  of  space  occupied  by  upper  premolarvS 

Length  of  space  occupied  by  ui)per  molars 

Breadth  of  upper  jaw  outside  of  canines    

Breadth  of  upper  jaw  outside  of  second  premolars 

Breadth  of  upper  jaw  outside  of  second  molars 

Breadth  of  upper  jaw  at  inner  side  of  infra-orbital  foramina 

Breadth  of  face  at  lower  margin  of  the  orbits 

Distance  from  lower  incisors  to  back  of  last  molar 

Length  of  space  occupied  by  lower  series  of  molar  teeth  . . . 

Length  of  space  occnpied  by  lower  premolars 

Length  of  space  occupied  by  lower  molars 

Depth  of  lower  jaw  at  symphysis 

Depth  of  lower  jaw  below  last  premolar    - 

Depth  of  lower  jaw  below  secoiul  molar 

Width  of  condyle  of  lower  jaw 


Liues. 


G2 

53 
2'1 
31 
22 
24 
30 
20 
55 
62 
48 
17 
31 
29 
19 
22 
19 


Diameter  of  upper  canine   

Diameter  of  lower  canine 

Diameter  of  second  upper  premolar 
Diameter  of  third  upper  premolar , . 
Diameter  of  fourth  upper  premolar 

Diameter  of  first  upper  molar 

Diameter  of  second  upper  molar  . . 

Diameter  of  third  upj)er  molar 

Diameter  of  first  lower  premolar . . . 
Diameter  of  second  lower  premolar 
Diameter  of  third  lower  premolar. . 

Diameter  of  first  lower  molar 

Diameter  of  second  lower  molar  . . . 
Diameter  of  third  lower  molar 


Antero- 
posterior. 


11 


Lines. 

5 

G 
5 

SJ 
-12" 
14 

5 

0 

Gi 

7 
10 
15.^ 


Transverse. 


Lines. 
4a 

4 
5 

^ 

10-10.} 

10^ 

23 

4i 

5 

G 


Of  other  bones  referable  to  Merycochoerus  rmticus,  the  collection  contains 
the  following: 

Portions  of  several  scapulER.  The  glenoid  cavity  is  oval,  and  mcasiurs  11 
Hnes  in  its  short  diameter,  and  15  lines  in  its  long  dianjolcr,  including  (he 
coracoid  process. 


208 

A  numlier  of  fragments,  mostly  distal  extremities  of  tibiae,  of  which  one  is 
represented  in  Fig.  9,  Plate  XX.  The  general  construction  is  the  same  as 
in  ordinary  even-toed  nngulates.  The  shaft  approaching  the  articulation  is 
three-sided,  with  the  outer  border  subacute.  This  terminates  in  a  triangular 
surface  for  junction  with  a  filjula.  The  internal  malleolus  is  comparatively 
long  and  pointed,  and  projects  below  the  position  of  the  anterior  process  of 
the  tibia.  The  articular  concavities  are  nearly  of  the  same  extent  fore  and 
aft,  but  the  outer  one  is  much  the  wider.  The  width  of  the  end  of  the  tibia 
in  different  specimens  ranges  from  13  to  14  lines,  and  the  fore  and  aft  diam- 
eter is  8J  lines. 

Of  a  number  of  specimens  of  the  astragalus,  one  is  represented  in  Fig.  10, 
Plate  XX.  It  is  about  the  size  of  that  of  the  peccary,  but  is  proportionately 
wider.  The  outer  division  of  the  trochlea  is  considerably  larger  than  the 
inner  one.  The"  posterior  articular  surface  for  the  calcaneum  extends  but 
little  more  than  half  the  width  of  the  bone.  The  length  of  the  astragalus 
externally  is  16  lines;    its  width  at  the  lower  tarsal  articulation  is  10^  lines. 

Of  a  number  of  specimens  of  the  calcaneum,  one  is  represented  in  Fig.  11. 
It  is  about  the  size  of  those  of  tlie  peccary,  but  is  more  robust  in  its  propor- 
tions. The  tuber  is  a  little  shorter,  but  considerably  thicker.  A  peculiarity 
of  the  bone  is  the  absence  of  a  sustentaculum  tali,  the  usual  articular  surface 
of  the  latter  being  supported  on  a  moderate  expansion  of  tlie  base  of  the 
tuber.     The  articular  eminence  for  the  fibula  is  but  slightly  prominent. 

The  length  of  the  calcaneum  is  2i  inches;  its  width  at  the  articulation 
below  the  tuber  is  8  lines. 

Another  specimen  of  a  calcaneum,  interesting  on  account  of  its  diseased 
condition,  is  represented  in  Fig.  15,  Plate  II. 

Merycochcerus  sp  *? 

Fig.  12,  Plate  XX,  represents  the  distal  end  of  the  tibia,  probably  of  a 
smaller  species  of  Merycochcerus.  The  specimen  was  found  with  those 
above  described.     The  transverse  diameter  of  the  articular  end  is  11  lines. 

An  astragalus  resembling  that  above  described  probably  belongs  to  the 
same  animal  as  the  latter.     It  is  lOJ  lines  long,  and  5J  lines  wide. 

Order  Solidungula. 

Associated  with  the  remains  of  Merycochcerus,  from  the  Sweetwater 
River,  there  arc  several  bones  of  a  small  equine  animal,  probably  a. species 


209 

ul' llip2)anon.  Cue  of  Uie  specimens  is  an  external  cnneil'orm  bone,  of  wliicli 
an  upper  view  is  given  in  Fig.  13,  Plate  XX.  Another  specimen  of  the  same 
bone  has  the  navicular  bone  co-ossified  with  it.  A  third  specimen  consists 
of  a  first  ungual  phalanx  17  lines  long  at  the  side,  and  14^  lines  wide  at  the 
upper  extremity. 
27  G 


DESCRIPTION  OF  VERTEBRATE  FOSSILS  FROM  THE  TERTIARY 
FORMATION  OF  JOHN  DAY'S  RIVER,  OREGON. 


Through  the  Smithsonian  Institution,  at  tlie  suggestion  of  Professor  S.  F. 
Baird,  a  collection  of  fossils  was  submitted  to  the  examination  of  Ihc  writer 
by  Rev.  Thomas  Condon,  of  Dalles  City,  Oregon. 

The  fossils  were  discovered  by  Mr.  Condon  mainly  in  the  valley  of  Bridge 
Creek,  a  tributary  of  John  Day's  River,  one  of  the  branches  of  the  Columbia 
River.  Some  additional  fossils  from  tlie  same  locality  were  also  placed  in  my 
hands  by  Professor  H.  S.  Osborn,  of  La  Fayette  College,  Easton,  Pennsyl- 
vania. 

With  the  exception  of  a  single  turtle-bone,  the  fossils  consist  of  remains  of 
mammals.  In  general  appearance  and  condition  of  preservation  they  resemble 
those  of  the  Mauvaises  Terres  of  White  River,  Dakota.  They  are  nearly  all 
specimens  which  have  been  found  lying  loose  on  the  surface  of  the  country, 
and  are,  therefore,  more  or  less  weathered,  or  much  injured  by  exposure.  A 
few  of  the  fossils  are  imbedded  in,  and  the  cavities  of  others  are  filled  with, 
a  liard,  compact,  homogeneous  rock  of  a  bluish-gray  hue.  The  rock  ajjpears 
to  be  an  indurated  marl,  and  contains  abundance  of  lime.  It  bears  a  near 
resemblance  to  the  matrix  of  the  fossils  of  the  Mauvaises  Terres  of  Dakota, 
except  that  it  is  more  compact  and  harder. 

The  zoological  character  of  the  fossils  is  sucli  as  to  render  it  probal)le  that 
the  formation  to  which  they  belong  is  of  contemporaneous  age  with  the  Te.r- 
tiary  deposit  of  the  locality  just  named. 

The  greater  number  pertain  to  a  species  of  Oreodon  larger  than  any  of 
those  from  White  River,  Dakota,  and  about  the  size  of  Merycocha'rus  proprius 
of  the  Niobrara  River,  Nebraska. 

A  number  of  the  fossils  appear  to  belong  to  some  of  the  same  species  as 
those  of  the  Mauvaises  Terres,  as  Oreodon  Culbertsoni,  Agrioclimrus  antiquus, 
and  A.  latifrons,  Jucptomeryx  Evansi,  Anchltherium  Bairdi,  and  Rhinoceros 
occidentalis. 

The  collections  further  contain  remains  of  a  second  species  of  Rhinoceros, 
two  species  of  Elotherium,  &c.,  generally  too  scanty  or  imperfect  to  ascertain 
positively  whether  they  pertain  to  species  previously  characterized 


211 

A  descrij)live  list  of  tlio  fossils  is  given  l)clow  : 

MAMMALIA. 

Order  Ruminantia. 

OREODON. 

Okeodon  Culbeetsoni. 

This  species,  established  on  a  multitude  of  remains  from  the  Mauvaises 
Terres  of  White  River,  Dakota,  is  apparently  indicated  by  some  small  frag- 
ments of  upper  and  lower  jaws  with  teeth,  which  are  labeled  "  Big  Bottom 
of  John  Day's  River."  One  of  the  best-preserved  and  most  characteristic 
specimens  consists  of  a  jaw-fragment  containing  the  upper  last  premolar 
and  the  molars,  the  latter  being  represented  in  Fig.  12,  Plate  VII.  In  all 
respects  it  is  like  the  corresponding  part  in  Oreodon  Culbertsoni,  from  White 
River.     Other  specimens  show  a  slight  variation  in  the  size  of  the  teeth. 

Oreodon  supeebus. 

Nearly  twenty-five  years  have  elapsed  since  the  first  fossil  remains  of 
mammals  from  the  Tertiary  foi-mations  of  the  West  were  submitted  to  my 
examination.  To  the  present  time  they  have  been  coming  to  me  in  constant 
succession,  so  that  I  have  had  the  op])ortunity  of  examining  thousands  of 
specimens,  the  collective  weight  of  which  would  amount  to  several  tons. 
From  some  of  the  first  specimens  brought  from  the  Mauvaises  Terres  of 
White  River,  Dakota,  after  a  few  errors,  I  thought  I  had  fixed  upon  well- 
marked  characters  distinguishing  the  extinct  genus  of  hog-like  ruminants,  for 
which  I  proposed  the  name  of  Oreodon.  Two  species  were  described  under 
the  names  of  O.  Culbertsoni  and  O.  ii;nicills,  mainly  from  a  marked  difference 
in  size. 

Several  detached  crania,  diifering  from  that  of  either  of  the  species  of  Oreo- 
don in  the  possession  of  large  inflated  ear-capsules,  at  first  attributed  to  a 
■peculiar  genus  with  the  name  of  Eucrotaphus,  were  subsequently  referred  to 
Agriochoerus,  which  had  originally  been  described  from  jaws  and  teeth.  Later 
this  determination  appeared  to  be  confirmed  by  an  almost  complete  skull  in 
which  the  cranium  agreed  with  the  detached  specimens. 

Some  small  fragments,  and  finally  a  complete  skull,  appeared  to  indicati;  a 
third  and  larger  species  of  Oreodon,  to  which  the  name  of  O.  majur  was  given. 


212 

It  is  especially  remarkal:)le  for  the  great  size  of  the  eai--capsules  compared 
with  those  of  the  other  species,  being  proportionately  quite  as  large  as  those 
in  Agriochoerus. 

Of  the  multitude  of  fragments  of  jaws  with  teeth,  portions  of  skulls,  and 
more  or  less  complete  skulls  of  Oreodon,  which  I  have  had  the  opportunity  of 
examining,  by  far  the  greater  number  are  referable  to  the  species  O.  Culbertsoni, 
about  a  twentieth  to  O.  gracilis,  and  one  per  centum  to  O.  major.  Specimens 
exhil)it  more  or  less  variation,  generally  of  a  comparatively  trifling  character, 
but  in  some  instances  to  such  a  degree  as  nearly  to  be  distinctive  enough  for 
other  species,  and  in  some  cases  as  nearly  to  remove  the  distinctions  between 
the  two  species  O.  Culbertsoni  and  O.  gracilis.  Two  specimens,  presenting  a 
greater  extent  of  variation  than  usual,  have  been  suspected  to  represent  hybrids 
in  the  one  case  between  O.  Culbertsoni  and  O.  gracilis,  in  the  otiier  case  between 
the  former  and  O.  major.  With  the  view  that  they  may  be  specifically  dis- 
tinct, they  have  been  named  O.  affinis  and  O.  hijfy-idus. 

After  a  number  of  years,  aaid  after  having  seen  many  hundred  specimens 
referable  to  O.  Culbertsoni,  to  my  utter  astonishment  one  of  the  last  ones 
received,  consisting  of  the  greater  part  of  a  skull,  while  agreeing  in  every 
other  respect  with  the  ordinary  form  of  O.  Culbertsoni,  possesses  ear-capsules 
as  large  as  those  of  Agriochoerus.  Looking  upon  this  specimen  as  represent- 
ing a  species  or  an  importaiit  variety,  the  name  of  O.  bullatus  was  applied  to 
it  in  allusion  to  its  large  inflated  ear-capsules. 

As  the  cranial  portion  of  the  skull  of  O.  bullatus  does  not  differ  in  size  from 
the  specimens  originally  referred  to  Eucrotaphus,  we  are  now  uncertain 
whether  they  pertained  to  O.  bullatus  or  Agriochoerus.  They  correlate  in 
size,  construction,  and  form  equally  well  with  either. 

Some  remains  from  the  Niobrara  River,  Nebraska,  while  clearly  indicating 
members  of  the  same  family  as  Oreodon,  appeared  to  me  to  belong  to  two 
different  genera,  to  which  the  names  of  Merycochoerus  and  Merychyus  were 
given.  The  recent  discovery  of  additional  remains  of  anotlier  species  of 
Merycochoerus,  on  the  Sweetwater  River,  Wyoming,  while  rendering  the  , 
characters  of  the  genus  more  obvious,  rather  tend  to  make  the  genus  Mery- 
chyus doubtful. 

The  skull  of  Merycochoerus  has  the  same  general  form  and  construction  as 
that  of  Oreodon,  and  the  teeth  agree  in  number,  relative  position,  and  consti- 
tution.    The  crowns  of  the  molar  teeth  in  Oreodon  are  short  and  inserted  by 


213 

fangs,  as  in  the  deer.  In  Merycochoerus  they  are  longer,  and  protrude  more 
gradually  as  they  are  worn  away.  The  face  is  more  abruptly  prolonged  in 
front  of  the  orbits ;  the  infra-orbital  arches  are  proportionately  of  much  greater 
depth;  and  the  infra-orbital  foramina  situated  much  further  back.  While  the 
fore  part  of  the  upper  jaw  of  Oreodon  is  constructed  in  the  more  ordinary 
manner  of  many  animals — suilline  pachyderms,  carnivora,  &c. — that  of  Mery- 
cochoerus is  more  like  that  of  the  tapir. 

Merychyus,  so  fixr  as  known,  is  intermediate  in  character  witli  Oreodon  and 
Merycochoerus.  Its  molar  teeth  are  like  those  of  the  latter ;  its  face  appears 
not  to  be  so  abruptly  narrowed;  and  the  infra-orbital  foramina  hold  an  inter- 
mediate position. 

Another  member  of  the  oreodont  family,  from  a  formation  probably  of 
equivalent  age  to  that  which  has  yielded  the  remains  of  the  Oreodons,  has  been 
named  Leptauchenia.  Its  molar  teeth  agree  in  character  with  those  of  Mery- 
cochoerus and  Merychyus,  but  are  more  strongly  folded  internally  in  the  case 
of  the  lower  ones,  externally  in  the  case  of  the  upper  ones.  The  face  is  more 
like  that  of  Oreodon ;  has  the  infra-orbital  foramina  in  the  same  relative  posi- 
tion, but  has  large  unossificd  spaces  at  the  upper  part  of  the  face. 

Oreodon  superhus,  the  name  which  appears  at  the  head  of  this  chapter,  was 
applied  to  a  species,  indicated  more  recently  than  any  of  the  preceding,  from 
specimens  belonging  to  Mr.  Condon's  collection  of  Oregon  fossils.  The  species 
exhibits  characters  which  make  it  somewhat  peculiar,  and  place  it  in  a  position 
intermediate  to  the  White  River  Oreodons  and  the  genus  Merycochoerus.  It 
is  exemplified  by  a  number  of  specimens,  among  which  is  the  mutilated  skull, 
represented,  one-half  the  natural  size,  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  I.  Other  specimens, 
consisting  of  detached  mutilated  crania,  portions  of  others,  and  fragments  of 
jaws  and  teeth,  pertain  to  half  a  dozen  or  more  individuals. 

The  skull  of  Oreodon  superhus  is  about  the  size  of  that  of  Merycocharus 
proprius.  In  form,  proportions,  and  constitution,  and  in  the  number,  relative 
position,  and  construction  of  the  teeth,  it  nearly  resembles  the  other  known 
species  of  the  genus  from  the  Mauvaises  Terres  of  White  River,  Dakota. 

The  cranium  proper  is  a  magnified  likeness  of  that  of  Oreodon  Culbertsoni 
or  O.  ?n(iJor,  and  more  especially  agrees  with  the  latter  in  the  possession  of 
large  inflated  ear-capsules.  It  presents  the  same  kind  of  variation  in  different 
specimens  observed  in  O.  Culbertsoni.  In  most  of  the  specimens  the  tempo- 
ral surfaces  slope  from  the  sagittal  crest  with  a  slight  sigmoid  curve.     In  one 


214 

specimen  the  parietal  surface  is  deeply  depressed  on  each  side  of  the  sagittal 
crest.  In  another  specimen  a  pair  of  well-marked  grooves  follow  the  course  of 
the  fore  part  of  the  squamous  suture,  one  in  front,  tlie  other  behind  it.  In  all 
the  specimens  the  front  groove  is  more  or  less  distinct;  in  some  of  them  the 
back  groove  is  bai'ely  perceptible. 

The  auditory  capsules  are  ovoidal,  with  the  greater  diameter  fore  and  aft, 
and  the  length  exceeding  the  widtli.  They  extend  from  the  paramastoid 
process  forward  to  the  middle  line  of  the  glenoid  articular  surface,  and  project 
below  the  level  of  this  for  half  their  length. 

The  face  of  Orcodon  superhus  differs  from  that  of  the  other  species  of  the 
genus  more  than  it  does  among  these.  It  especially  differs  in  the  position  of 
the  infra-orbital  foramen,  and  in  the  great  proportionate  depth  of  the  infra- 
orbital arch.  In  the  other  known  species  of  Oreodon  the  infra-orbital  fora- 
men occupies  a  position  above  the  third  premolar.  In  O.  superbus  it  is  placed 
above  the  last  premolar,  as  in  Merychyus.  In  Merycochoerus  it  is  placed  fur- 
ther back  over  the  interval  of  the  first- and  second  true  molars.  The  infra- 
orbital arch  is  proportionately  as  deep  as  in  Merycochoerus,  and  like  it  presents 
a  broad,  nearly  flat  surface,  extending  forward  below  the  position  of  the  lach- 
rymal fossa.  The  latter  is  relatively  shallow.  The  forehead  is  more  flat  than 
is  usual  in  Oreodon  Culbertsoni.  The  anterior  nasal  orifice  is  like  that  in  other 
species  of  the  genus. 

The  teeth  of  Oreodon  superhus,  so  far  as  we  have  had  the  opportunity  of 
examining  them,  appear  to  agree  in  all  respects  witli  those  of  the  other  known 
species. 

Fig.  16,  Plate  II,  represents  a  fragment  of  the  lower  jaw,  natural  size,  con- 
taining the  premolars  and  the  fii'st  molar.  A  view  of  the  triturating  surfaces 
of  the  premolars  is  given  in  Fig.  9,  Plate  VII. 

Figs.  7,  8,  Plate  VII,  represent  a  first  molar,  part  of  the  second,  and  the 
last  molar  from  a  lower-jaw  specimen. 

Fig.  10,  of  the  same  plate,  represents  a  facial  specimen,  with  a  view  of  the 
forehead,  one-half  the  natural  size. 

Measurements  obtained  from  several  specimens  of  portions  of  skulls  of 
Oreodon  superbus  arc  as  follows  : 

Estimated  length  of  skull,  approximating  14  incbes. 


215 


Breadth  of  forehead  between  orbits  on  line  with  supra-orbital 

ioramiua 

Length  of  face  from  orbit  to  lateral  nasal  notch , 

Height  of  face  on  line  with  the  second  true  molar 

Depth  of  orbital  entrance 

Transverse  diameter  of  the  same 

Depth  of  infra-orbital  arch 

Length  of  upi^er  molar  series,  estimated  at 

Antero-posterior  diameter  of  last  upper  molar    

Transverse  diameter  of  last  upper  molar 

Breadth  of  nasals  together 


Liucs. 


50 
54 
48 
21 
19 
18 
70 


Lilies. 


L'l 


174 
15i 


Lines. 


50 


IG 


Measurements  obtained  from  lower-jaw  fragments  detached  and  not  per- 
taining to  tlie  preceding : 


Liues. 


Lines. 


Lines. 


Lines. 


Sjmce  occupied  by  the  lower  molar  series 

Space  occupied  by  tire  lower  premolars 

Space  occupied  bj-  the  lower  molars 

Depth  of  jaw  below  back  of  last  molar 

Depth  of  jaw  below  fore  part  of  last  molar 

Depth  of  jaw  below  middle  of  first  molar 

Depth  of  jaw  below  middle  of  second  premolar 
Antero-posterior  diameter  of  first  premolar  . . . 

Transverse  diameter  of  .first  premolar 

Antero-posterior  diameter  of  second  premolar. 

Transverse  diameter  of  second  premolar 

Antero-posterior  diameter  of  third  premolar  . , 

Transverse  diameter  of  third  premolar 

Antero-posterior  diameter  of  first  molar 

Transverse  diameter  of  first  molar , 

Antero-j)osterior  diameter  of  second  molar 

Transverse  diameter  of  second  molar 

Antero-posterior  diameter  of  third  molar 

Transverse  diameter  of  third  molar 

Transverse  diameter  crown  of  lower  cauine 


GO 
25 
40 


27 


41 
33 
26 

24 


10 

7 
114 

8.J 
19J 

9 


30J 


9 
10 

^ 
11 

64 


274 


31 
31 


11 


216 

LEPTOMERYX. 

Leptomeryx   Evansi. 

A  small  ruminant,  related  to  the  musks,  was  originally  described  under  the 
above  name,  from  remains  discovered  by  Dr.  John  Evans  and  Professor  Hay- 
den  in  the  Mauvaises  Terres  of  White  River,  Dakota. 

Two  small  fragments  of  jaws,  the  one  containing  a  well-preserved  upper 
molar  and  the  other  a  lower  molar,  from  John  Day's  River,  agree  in  all  re- 
spects with  the  corresponding  parts  of  Leptomeryx  Evansi. 

AGRIOCHCERUS. 
Agriochcerus  antiquus.     Agriociicerus  latifeons. 

The  above  genus  and  species  were  originally  characterized  from  remains 
found  in  the  Mauvaises  Terres  of  Dakota.  The  genus  is  related  with  Oreodon, 
but  exhibits  peculiarities  enough  to  regard  it  as  pertaining  to  another  family 
of  extinct  ruminating  hog-like  animals. 

A  small  fragment  of  an  upper  jaw  with  portion  of  a  molar,  and  a  few  frag- 
ments of  detached  molars  from  John  Day's  River,  appear  to  indicate  the 
presence  of  both  the  above-mentioned  species. 

Artiodactyla. 

DICOTYLES. 

DiCOTYLES    PRISTINUS. 

An  extinct  animal  about  the  size  of  and  nearly  allied  to  the  living  collared 
peccary,  Dicotyles  torquatus,  is  represented  in  the  Condon  collection  by 
several  detached  lower  molar  teeth.  These  have  nearly  the  size  and  consti- 
tution of  those  of  the  collared  peccary,  though  considerably  worn  and  there- 
fore smoother  than  when  in  a  younger  condition.  Independently  of  this 
smoothness,  due  to  age,  the  constituent  lobes  of  their  crowns  do  not  present 
the  wrinkled  condition  observed  in  the  living  peccaries. 

The  last  lower  molar,  i-epresented  in  Fig.  14,  Phite  VII,  has  a  five-lobed 

.crown  with  a  basal  ridge  in  frout  and  externally,  and  also  postero-internally. 

Tlie  lobes  of  the  crown  are  comparatively  simple,  or  but  slightly  complicated 

by  oifsets  or  folds.     The  penultimate  molar,  represented  in  Fig.  13,  Plate  VII, 

has  four  principal  lobes  to  the  crown,  arranged  as  in  the  recent  peccary. 

An  upper  molar,  from  a  younger  animal,  perha])s,  belonged  to  the  same 


217 

species.     It  is  more  square  tlian  in  the  recent  peccary,  and  has  llie  (pur  con- 
stituent lobes  of  the  crown  comparatively  smooth  and  devoid  of  wrinkles. 

Measurements  of  the  specimens  referred  to  Dicotyles  pristinus  are  as  fol- 
lows : 

Lines. 

Auteroposterior  diameter  of  last  lower  molar 9 

Trausverse  diameter  of  last  lower  molar 5 

Auteroposterior  diameter  of  penultimate  lower  molar 7 

Trausverse  diameter  of  peuultimato  lower  molar ^\ 

Autero-posterior  diameter  of  lirst  or  secoud  upper  moJar 0 

Transverse  diameter  of  first  or  secoud  upper  molar 5.J 

Professor  O.  C.  Marsh  has  also  described  some  remains  of  peccaries  from 
the  same  locality,  which  he  attributes  to  two  species  under  the  names  of 
Dicotyles  hesperius  and  Platygonus  Condoni.  The  former  is  estimated  as  about 
half  the  bulk  of  the  collared  peccary,  the  latter  as  being  about  the  size  of 
the  li0£ 


■'&• 


ELOTHERIUM. 

Elotherium  imperatoe. 

Mr.  Condon's  collection  of  Oregon  fossils  contains  portions  of  several  teeth 
of  large  size,  which  are  supposed  to  belong  to  a  huge  species  of  Elotherium, 
for  which  the  above  name  is  proposed. 

One  of  the  specimens,  represented  in  Fig.  3,  Plate  II,  is  a  portion  of  a 
large  canine  tooth,  from  Bridge  Creek.  In  the  perfect  condition  the  tooth 
would  appear  to  have  measured  upward  of  7  inches  in  length.  The  crown 
has  measured  about  3^  inches  long,  with  the  diameter  at  base  antero-posteriorly 
about  22  lines,  and  transversely  about  20  lines.  The  enamel  is  moderately 
rugose,  except  near  the  back  border  of  the  crown,  where  it  exhibits  a  more 
folded  or  ridged  appearance.  The  gibbous  fang  has  been  over  4  inches  in 
leneth,  with  the  fore  and  aft  diameter  about  2  inches  and  the  transverse 
diameter  20  lines. 

Another  mutilated  specimen,  from  Bridge  Creek,  supposed  to  be  an  upper 
incisor,  is  represented  in  Fig.  27,  Plate  VII.  When  complete,  the  tooth  has 
measured  over  4  inches  in  length.  The  fang  is  long,  conical,  and  nearly 
straight.  The  crown  forms  with  its  fang  an  obtuse  bend  or  angle.  It  is 
conical,  compressed  from  without  inwardly,  and  has  the  lateral  borders  sub- 
acute and  somewhat  expanded  toward  the  base. 
28  G 


218 

A  tliii;d  specimen,  from  John  Day's  River,  represented  in  Fig.  4,  Plate  II, 
consists  of  tlie  greater  portion  of  the  crown  of  an  anterior  premolar.  It  is 
blunted  at  the  apex  as  the  result  of  wear.  When  perfect  and  unworn  it  has 
measured  about  1^  inches  in  length,  about  16  lines  antero-posteriorly,  and 
about  9J  lines  in  thickness. 

It  is  not  improbable  that  part  or  the  whole  of  the  specimens  pertain  to  the 
species  named  Elotherium  superbum,  from  an  isolated  incisor  tooth  found  in 
Calaveras  County,  California,  in  the  same  formation  in  which  was  discovered 
the  specimen  of  a  lower  jaw  referred  to  Rhinoceros  hesperius. 

Solidungula. 

ANCHITHERIUM. 
Anchitherium  Baiedi. 

The  extinct  genus  of  solidungulate  animals,  Anchitherium,  was  originally 
described  from  remains  found  in  the  middle  Tertiary  formation  of  France. 
Abundant  remains  of  a  species  have  also  been  found  in  the  Mauvaises  Terres 
of  White  River,  Dakota,  which  have  been  described  under  the  name  of 
Anchitherium  Balrdi.  The  Condon  collection  contains  several  specimens, 
consisting  of  detached  molars  and  fragments  of  others,  apparently  of  the 
same  species.  One  of  the  best  preserved  of  these,  the  crown  of  an  upper 
molar,  is  represented  in  Fig.  15,  Plate  VII.  In  every  respect  it  agrees  with 
the  upper  molars  of  the  Anchitherium  Bairdi  of  White  River. 

Anchitherium  Condoni. 

A  specimen  in  the  Oregon  collection  of  fossils,  consisting  of  a  small  jaw- 
fragment  with  a  mutilated  molar,  represented  in  Fig.  5,  Plate  II,  I  have 
referred  to  a  species  of  Anchitherium,  though  several  points  lead  me  to  sus- 
pect that  it  may  belong  to  a  different  though  closely  allied  genus.  The  gen- 
eral form  and  construction  of  the  teeth  are  the  same  as  in  A.  aurelianense  and 
A.  Bairdi.  The  intermediate  lobes  of  the  crown  are  proportionately  larger, 
more  distinct  from  the  others,  and  more  prominent  than  in  the  species  just 
mentioned.  A  tubercle  springing  from  the  basal  ridge  between  the  antero- 
interual  and  antero-median  lobes  is  obsolete  in  the  true  Anchitherium. 

The  diameter  of  the  crown  in  both  directions  is  about  three-fourths  of  an 
inch.     The  species  was  named  in  compliment  to  the  Rev.  Thomas  Condon, 


219 

lliruiigli  whose  iulerch;!  ia  natural  history  most  of  the  Oregon  fossils  have  been 
brought  to  the  notice  of  the  world. 

Perissodactyla. 

LOPHIODON? 

Among  the  fossils  from  Bridge  Creek,  in  the  Condon  collection,  there  is  a 
small  fragment  of  an  upper  jaw  containing  two  molar  teeth,  represented  in 
Fig.  1,  Plate  II,  which  proljably  indicates  a  tapiroid  animal,  allied  if  not 
actually  pertaining  to  the  extinct  genus  Lophiodon.  The  teeth,  which  appear 
to  be  the  upper  back  premolars,  are  much  worn,  and  the  last  one  is  mutilated. 
They  belonged  to  an  animal  about  the  size  of  the  common  American  tapir, 
(  Tapirus  terrestris.) 

The  teeth  neai'ly  resemble  the  corresponding  ones,  as  we  might  suppose 
them  to  1)6  in  the  same  state  of  wear,  of  Lophiodon  isselense,  of  the  Eocene 
formation  of  France,  as  represented  in  Gervais's  Plate  XVIII,  of  the  Zoologie 
et  Paleontologie  francaises ;  or  they  would  appear  to  bear  a  nearer  resem- 
blance to  those  (A  PalcRosyops  paludosus  of  the  Bridger  Tertiary  formation  of 
Wyoming. 

The  teeth  are  inserted  with  three  fangs,  two  externally  and  a  broader  one 
internally.  The  crowns  are  widest  transversely,  square  without,  semicircular 
within.  They  are  composed  of  a  pair  of  pyramidal  lobes  externally  and  an 
internal  median  conical  lobe  embraced  by  a  thick  basal  ridge.  The  antero- 
external  lobe  extends  in  a  ridge  to  the  fore  part  of  the  base  of  the  inner  lobe, 
and  the  postero-external  lobe  appears  to  have  been  continuous  by  a  ridge 
with  the  base  of  the  inner  lobe.  A  thin  basal  ridge  festoons  the  outer  part 
of  the  crown. 

In  the  worn  condition  of  the  teeth  they  present  a  wide  tract  of  dentine 
continuously  on  the  outer  lobes.  In  the  penultimate  premolar  the  tract  ex- 
tends inwardly  from  the  postero-external  lobe  on  the  inner  lobe,  and  from 
the  antero-external  lobe  to  the  base  of  the  latter  in  front.  In  the  last  pre- 
molar the  dentinal  surface  of  the  outer  lobes  extends  continuously  on  the 
inner  lobe. 

The  penultimate  premolar  measures  8J  lines  antero-posteriorly,  and  \\\ 
lines  transversely;  the  last  premolar  measured  about  10  hues  antero-poste- 
riorly, 11  lines  traoisversely. 

The  size  of  the  specimen,  and  its  apparent  rclatiiniship  with  Lophiodon, 


220 

led  me  to  suspect  that  it  might  pertain  to  the  same  animal  as  an  isolated 
molar  tooth,  from  the  Mauvaises  Torres  of  White  River,  Dakota,  described 
under  the  name  of  Lopliiodon  occidentaUs. 

RHINOCEROS. 

A  number  of  fossils  in  the  Oregon  collection  appear  to  indicate  two  differ- 
ent species  of  Rhinoceros,  or  perhaps  the  hornless  form  Aceratherium.  One 
of  them  was  about  the  size  of  the  Rhinoceros  occidentaUs  of  the  Tertiary  of 
the  Mauvaises  Terres  of  White  River,  Dakota,  and  was  first  supposed  to 
belong  to  that  species.  A  more  attentive  examination  of  its  remains  has  led 
to  the  detection  of  several  peculiarities  which  render  it  probable  it  may  be  a 
distinct  species.  As  the  specimens  co-ordinate  in  size  with  the  lower  jaw 
from  the  California  Tertiary,  on  which  was  founded  the  R.  hesperius,  they 
may  perhaps  pertain  to  this  species ;  and  in  this  view  I  will  so  consider  them. 
Of  course,  more  ample  material  may  confirm  or  refute  our  position,  and  may 
determine  the  fossils  to  indicate  an  animal  different  from  7^.  occidentaUs  and 
R.  hesperius. 

The  second  species,  a  larger  animal,  intermediate  in  size  to  the  latter  ones, 
and  the  R.  crassus  of  the  Niobrara  Pliocene  Tertiary,  has  been  distinguished 
with  the  name  of  R.  pcmficus. 

Rhinoceros  hesperius? 

The  fossils  of  the  Condon  collection,  attributed  with  some  probability  to 
this  species,  consist  of  a  mutilated  portion  of  an  upper  jaw  an  isolated  upper 
molar,  and  a  lower-jaw  fragment  containing  one  entire  molar. 

The  upper-jaw  specimen  contains  portions  of  the  fangs  of  the  molars,  of 
which  there  were  seven,  occupying  a  space  of  about  7^  inches,  or  about 
equal  to  that  in  Rhinoceros  occidentaUs. 

The  anterior  extremity  of  the  space  included  by  the  zygoma  extends  to  a 
line  with  the  interval  of  the  second  and  third  molars;  in  R.  occidentaUs  it 
extends  only  to  a  line  with  the  back  part  of  the  last  molar. 

The  infra-orbital  foramen  is  large,  and  occupies  a  position  alcove  the  second 
premolar;  in  R.  occidentaU's  it  is  over  the  third  premolar. 

Tlie  upper  molar,  the  last  of  the  series,  represented  in  Fig.  8,  Plate  II,  has 
nearly  the  size  and  form  of  that  of  R.  occidentaUs.  As  in  tliis,  the  crown 
consists  of  a  pair  of  lobes  diverging  inward  from  the  antero-cxternal  corner. 


221 

A  strong  bulge  iirqjecls  from  the  middle  of  the  anterior  lol:)c  into  the  valley 
of  the  crown,  which  is  not  so  well  developed  in  It.  occidentalis,  and  a  second 
bulge  at  the  bottom  of  the  valley  is  absent  in  the  latter.  The  basal  ridge  is 
stronger  in  front,  and  internally  at  the  entrance  of  the  valley  of  the  crown  it 
forms  two  conspicuous,  rounded  tubercles  not  seen  in  a  corresponding  posi- 
tion in  R.  occidentalis.  The  presence  of  these  tubercles,  however,  is,  perhaps, 
merely  an  individual  peculiarity.  The  tooth  measures  15  lines  antero-poste- 
riorly  and  internally,  and  is  estimated  to  have  been  19  lines  transversely. 

The  lower-jaw  fragment,  containing  a  molar,  represented  in  Fig.  9,  Plate 
II,  exhibits  nothing  peculiar  distinguishing  it  from  the  corresponding  part 
either  of  R.  occidentalis  or  R.  hesperius. 

Rhinoceros  pacifictis. 

The  fossil  specimens  indicative  of  the  second  species  of  rhinoceros  from 
the  Oregon  Tertiary  consist  of  a  mutilated  right  side  of  the  upper  jaw  with 
portions  of  fangs  of  the  molars,  except  of  the  first  premolar,  and  several  iso- 
lated molar  teeth. 

The  specimens  indicate  a  species  larger  than  the  preceding,  but  not  reach- 
ing Rhinoceros  crassus  of  the  Niobrara  Tertiary,  which  was  about  the  size  of 
the  existing  India  rhinoceros. 

The  upper-jaw  specimen  retains  portions  of  the  fangs  of  six  molar  teeth, 
counting  from  behind.  The  space  occupied  by  the  back  two  premolars  and 
the  molars  is  estimated  at  nearly  7^  inches ;  that  occupied  by  the  true  molars 
at  rather  more  than  5  inches. 

The  fore  part  of  the  zygomatic  space  is  on  a  line  with  the  fore  part  of  the 
last  molar  tooth. 

Fig.  6,  Plate  II,  represents  an  upper  molar  which  is  supposed  to  belong  to 
this  species.  The  specimen  is  broken  at  its  back  part,  and  is  labeled  "Alkali 
Flat."  The  crown  at  the  fore  part  measures  21  lines  in  diameter,  and  is  esti- 
mated to  have  measured  IJ  inches  antero-posteriorly.  The  bottom  of  the 
crown  is  embraced  with  a  strong  basal  ridge,  which  is  strongest  anteriorly 
and  internally.  The  inner  lobes  expand  inwardly,  but  do  not  bulge  in  the 
abrupt  manner  posteriorly  to  the  same  degree  that  they  do  in  R.  occidentalis. 
The  bottom  of  the  oblique  valley  of  the  crown  is  expanded,  and  is  compli- 
cated by  the  projection  into  it  of  four  folds. 

Another  tooth,  represented  in  Fig.  7,  Plate  II,  likewise  labeled  "Alkali 


222 

Flat,"  has  the  appearance  in  condition  of  i)reservation,  color,  and  wear,  as  if 
it  might  have  pertained  to  the  same  individual  as  the  former  specimen.  If 
so,  it  is  related  to  it  apparent!}'  as  the  last  premolar  to  the  first  molar.  The 
antero-posterior  diameter  of  the  crown  is  nearly  16  lines;  the  transverse 
diameter  is  19  lines.  The  basal  ridge  and  inner  lobes  are  as  in  the  former 
tooth.  Traces  at  the  bottom  of  the  oblique  valley  appear  to  indicate  a  dispo- 
sition to  the  formation  of  two  folds  like  those  existing  in  the  same  position  in 
the  larger  tooth. 

It  is  not  unlikely  that  this  second  molar  tooth  may  be  a  true  molar  of  the 
preceding  species. 

The  crown  of  a  lower  molar  tooth,  represented  in  Figs.  24,  25,  Plate  VII, 
from  Bridge  Creek,  is  supposed  to  belong  to  R.  imcificus.  It  measures  20 
lines  fore  and  aft,  and  1  inch  transversely,  at  base. 

HADROHYUS. 

Hadrohyus   supremus. 

Among  the  Condon  collection  of  Oregon  fossils  there  are  several,  apparently 
of  a  large  pachyderm,  differing  from  those  previously  indicated,  and  likewise 
different  in  character  from  such  as  have  been  heretofore  described. 

Fig.  26,  Plate  XVII,  represents  a  fragment  of  a  tooth  which  I  have  sup- 
posed to  be  a  last  upper  premolar.  The  crown  of  the  tooth  would  appear  in 
its  entire  condition  to  have  nearly  the  form  and  construction  of  the  corre- 
sponding tooth  of  the  Oreodonts,  but  differs  especially  in  the  proportionately 
less  degree  of  development  of  the  inner  lobe  and  the  greater  degree  of  pro- 
duction of  the  inner  basal  ridge.  The  remains  of  the  inner  lobe  have  the 
appearance  of  being  composed  of  a  nearly  connate  pair,  which  no  doubt 
would  be  found  better  developed  and  more  distinct  in  the  succeeding  teeth. 
In  the  specimen  the  inner  lobe  appears  notched,  and  the  dentine  is  exposed 
on  the  outer  lobe  and  the  anterior  division  of  the  inner  lobe. 

The  transverse  diameter  of  the  specimen  is  1^  inches.  The  tooth  is 
labeled  "Alkali  Flats,"  and  may  be  regarded  as  representing  the  animal  to 
which  the  above  name  is  given. 

Another  specimen  pertaining  to  an  animal  as  large  as  that  to  which  the 
tooth  just  described  belonged,  and  perhaps  actually  belonging  to  the  same, 
consists  of  a  brain-cast,  or  rather  the  cast  of  the  interior  of  a  cranium.  The 
cast  has  nearly  the  size  and  shape  of  the  brain  of  a  horse.     The    cerebral 


223 

hemispheres  arc  nearly  as   much  convohitcd  as  in  the  latter,  and  measure 
about  Ah  inches  in  length  and  breadth. 

A  third  specimen,  which  may  likewise  be  suspected  as  belonging  to  Had- 
rohyus,  is  a  large  atlas,  which  measures  5  inches  in  width  between  the  outer 
acute  borders  of  the  articular  cups  for  the  occipital  condyles,  and  about  4i 
inches  from  the  neural  tubercle  to  the  hypapophysis.  The  vertebra  differs  in 
several  important  points  from  the  atlas  of  the  rhinoceros,  horse,  ox,  &c.,  but 
the  want  of  the  requisite  means  of  comparison  prevents  me  from  determin- 
ing its  nearer  relationship. 

AN    UNDETERMINED    CARNIVORE. 

A  supposed  carnivorous  animal  of  large  size  is  indicated  l)y  the  portion  of 
a  large  canine  tooth,  represented  in  Fig.  26,  Plate  VII.  The  specimen  per- 
tains to  the  Condon  collection  of  Oregon  fossils. 

CHELONIA. 

TestudinidiB. 

STYLEMYS. 

The  extinct  genus  of  turtles  above  named,  and  originally  described  from 
remains  found  in  the  Miocene  Tertiary  formation  of  the  Mauvaises  Terres  of 
White  River,  Dakota,  was  most  nearly  related  with  the  existing  land-tortoises. 
The  shell  is  of  the  simplest  form,  and  is  about  as  prominent  as  in  the  less 
vaulted  forms  of  the  living  species  of  Testudo,  or  the  more  vaulted  ones  of 
the  terrapenes.  The  proportions  nearly  accord  with  those  of  our  southern 
gopher,  but  the  carapace  is  more  uniformly  convex. 

The  carapace  is  most  prominent  just  back  of  the  middle,  and  is  abruptly 
rounded  posteriorly  as  usual  in  the  tortoises.  The  margin  is  entire,  feebly 
emarginate  in  front,  somewhat  expanded  and  everted  over  the  axillary  spaces, 
and  in  a  less  degree  everted  over  the  inguinal  spaces. 

The  plastron  holds  the  ordinary  proportions  to  the  carapace  as  in  Testudo 
and  Emys.  It  is  for  the  most  part  flat,  and  only  moderately  turned  up  in 
front.  The  extremities  are  nearly  equal  and  rounded.  The  anterior  is 
slightly  narrowed ;  the  posterior  is  moderately  notched. 

The  number,  shape,  and  relations  of  the  bones  of  the  shell  are  nearly  the 
same  as  in  Testudo  and  Emys.  The  number  of  the  vertebral  plates  is  ten, 
occasionally  eleven,  from  subdivision  of  the  usual  eighth  plate. 


224 

The  ninth  plate  appears  like  a  correspoiuling  pair  of  costal  plates  connate 
in  the  median  line.  The  tenth  plate  is  lozenge-shaped,  and  occupies  a 
similar  shaped  interval  of  the  ninth  vex'tebral  and  the  pygal  plates. 

The  eight  pairs  of  costal  plates  in  their  alternate  narrowing  and  widening 
toward  the  extremities  resemble  those  of  the  living  tortoises,  though  the 
variation  is  not  so  great  as  usual  in  these. 

The  interior  of  the  vertebral  plates  of  Styleuiys  exhibits  a  deep,  narrow, 
keel-like  ridge,  as  represented  in  Fig.  6,  Plate  III,  and  Fig.  9,  Plate  XIX,  in- 
tended for  union  with  the  neural  arches  of  the  vertebrae.  A  similar  con- 
dition exists  in  the  Gallipagos  and  other  living  tortoises. 

The  costal  capituli,  as  seen  in  Fig.  6,  Plate  III,  and  Fig.  9,  Plate  XIX, 
are  feebly  developed  as  in  most  species  of  Testudo,  but  are  not  reduced  to 
the  rudimental  condition  observed  in  our  gopher. 

The  first  pair  are  as  well  developed  as  usual.  The  sixth  and  seventh  pairs 
unite  with  processes  of  the  corresponding  vertebral  plates.  The  eighth  and 
ninth  pairs,  better  developed  than  those  in  advance,  unite  in  the  root  of  the 
process  of  the  eighth  costal  plate  for  the  attachment  of  the  pelvis. 

The  scutes  of  both  the  carapace  and  plastron  of  Stylemys  correspond  with 
those  of  Testudo.  The  pygal  scute  is  single  as  in  all  living  tortoises,  except 
Manouria.     The  pectoral  scutes  are  very  narrow,  as  usual  in  Testudo. 

The  thickness  and  strength  of  the  shell  of  Stylemys  is  greater  than  ordi- 
narily in  the  latter,  liut  proportionately  not  more  so  than  in  several  living 
species. 

The  bones  of  the  limbs,  so  far  as  we  are  acquainted  with  them,  approach 
in  character  those  of  the  tortoises.  The  concavity  above  the  articular  surface 
of  the  distal  extremity  of  the  humerus,  but  especially  of  the  femur,  is  deeper 
than  in  the  living  forms. 

The  remains  of  Stylemys  are  apparently  referable  to  three  species,  all 
geographically  and  perhaps  geologically  separated. 

Stylemys  nebrascensis. 

The  remains  of  this  species  form  one  of  the  most  abundant  fossils  of  the 
Miocene  Tertiary  deposit  of  the  Mauvaises  Terres  of  White  River,  Dakota. 
A  multitude  of  specimens  of  nearly  entire  shells  have  been  collected  by  all 
explorers  of  the  locality   in  which  they  are  found.     Tliey  present  a  great 


variety  of  age,  size,  aiid  coiulilioii  ol'  prcsicrvalion.  Many  exhihil  in  tlicii- 
clistortioii  evidences  of  considerable  pressure,  while  others  are  so  well  pre- 
served as  to  appear  entirely  iitibroken.  Their  varied  conditions,  added  to 
slight  anatomical  variation,  led  me  at  first  to  attribute  them  to  five  different 
species,  which  I  now  view  as  one. 

Mature  speciinims  are  comparatively  rare,  at  least  in  an  entire  condition 
One,  broken  into  two  pieces,  is  represented  in  Plate  XXIII  of  "The  Ancient. 
Fauna  of  Nebraska."'  A  second,  more  complete,  was  obtained  by  Professor 
Hayden  for  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia. 

Very  few  other  bones  of  Stylemys  nebrascensis,  other  than  those  of  the 
shell,  have  come  under  my  notice.  Among  hundreds  of  shells  and  fragments 
of  others,  I  never  met  with  any  portions  of  the  skull  or  jaws. 

Fig.  10,  Plate  XIX,  represents  a  fragment  of  tlic  scapula  with  part  of  its 
precoraco'id.     It  agrees  with  the  corresponding  portion  of  the  Ijone  in  Testudo. 

Fig.  7,  of  the  same  plate,  represents  the  distal  extremity  of  a  humerus  of 
a  youtig  individual.  The  hollow  above  the  articular  surface  is  rather  deeper 
than  in  Testudo. 

Stylemys  niobrarensis. 

Numerous  fragments  of  shells  and  a  few  portions  of  other  bones  of  a 
second  species -of  Stylemys  were  discovered  by  Professor  Hayden  in  the 
Pliocene  sands  of  the  Niobrara  River  in  the  year  1857.  •  All  the  anatomical 
characters  of  the  specimens  indicate  the  same  genus  as  the  former,  but 
several  of  them  point  to  a  different  species.  It  was  about  the  same  size  as 
the  S.  nebrascensis. 

Fig.  4,  Plate  III,  represents  the  anterior  portion  of  a  plastron  of  the 
natural  size,  and  therefore  supposed  to  have  belonged  to  a  young  animal.  The 
episternals  are  more  prouiinent  forward  than  in  S.  nebrascensis,  and  they  are 
deeply  excavated  beneath  the  broad  scute-covered  margin,  which  is  not  the 
case  in  the  species  just  named. 

Fig.  5  represents  the  last  vertebral  and  the  pygal  plates  ol"  .  an 
older  animal.  It  shows  that  the  investing  scute  is  single,  as  in  Testudo.  The 
lower  margin  of  the  pygal  bone  is  slightly  but  decidedly  everted,  which  is 
not  the  case  in  S.  nebrascensis. 

Fig.  6   represents  an  inner  view  of  a  portion  of  a  carapace  one-halt  the 
natural  size.     It  belonged  to  a  mature  animal,  aiul  is  the  most  (Complete  por- 
20  a 


226 

tion  of  the  shell  of  the  species  whicli  has  been  submitted  to  me.  It  com- 
prises the  vertebral  plates  from  the  sixth  to  the  ninth  inclusive,  and  portions 
of  the  corresponding  costal  plates  on  each  side.  The  narrow  character  of  the 
costal  capitida  is  observable  in  the  sixth  and  seventh  pairs  ;  and  the  two  suc- 
ceeding pairs  are  observable  as  they  spring  from  the  strong  process  for  the 
attachment  of  the  pelvis. 

Fig.  8,  Plate  XIX,  represents  the  distal  extremity  of  a  right  humerus,  and 
Fig.  6  the  same  part  of  a  left  femur,  both  half  the  natural  size.  The  femur 
would  appear  to  have  belonged  to  a  larger  animal  than  the  humerus.  The 
concavity  above  the  articular  surface  is  much  deeper  tlian  in  other  known 
turtles.  The  l)readth  of  the  femur,  at  the  condyloid  eminences,  is  32  lines ; 
that  of  the  humerus,  in  a  corresponding  position,  has  been  nearly  the  same. 

Stylemys  oeegonensis. 

An  isolated  vetebral  plate,  in  the  Condon  collection  of  Oregon  fossils,  is 
supposed  to  indicate  a  third  species  of  Stylemys.  The  specimen  was  found 
on  Crooked  River,  and  is  represented,  one-half  the  natural  size,  in  Fig.  10, 
Plate  XV.  It  exhibits  a  transverse  groove  defining  two  vertebral  scute  areas, 
and  on  the  interior  a  narrow  crest  for  union  with  the  corresponding  neural 
arch.  The  plate  appears  to  be  the  third  of  the  series,  and  is  tliicker  in  pro- 
portion with  its  length  and  breadth  than  would  appear  to  be  the  case  in  the 
preceding  species  of  Stylemys.  The  specimen  is  2  inches  wide,  IJ  inches 
long,  and  7  lines  thick. 


DESCRIPTIONS  OF  REMAINS  OF  VERTEBRATA  FROM  TERTIARY 
FORMATIONS  OF  DIFFERENT  STATES  AND  TERRITORIES 
WEST  OF  THE  MISSISSIPPI  RIVER. 


The  fossil  remains  described  in  the  succeeding  pages  consist  mainl\'  of 
isolated  specimens  obtained  from  Tertiary  formations  in  various  parts  of  the 
country  west  of  the  Mississippi  River.  They  are  nearly  all  remains  of  mam- 
mals. Included  in  the  series  there  are  descriptions  of  a  few  other  Tertiary 
mammalian  fossils,  from  the  country  east  pf  the  Mississippi,  described  on 
account  of  their  relation  with  the  former,  and  for  the  most  part  for  the  first 
time. 

MAMMALIA. 

Order  Carnivora. 
FELIS. 

FeLIS    AUC4USTUS. 

Several  teeth  in  fragments  of  jaws,  and  portions  of  other  teeth,  indicate  a 
sjjecies  of  tiger  apparently  diiferent  from  any  previously  described.  The 
specimens  were  discovered  by  Professor  Hayden,  during  Warren's  expedition 
of  1857,  on  the  Loup  Fork  of  the  Niobrara  Eiver,  iSTebraska.  They  belong 
to  the  Pliocene  Tertiary  formation,  and  were  found  in  association  with  remains 
of  Mastodon  mirificus,  Merychyus  elegans,  Frocamelus  occidcHtalis,  &^'c. 

The  most  characteristic  of  the  specimens,  represented  in  Fig.  19,  Plate  VII, 
is  an  upper  sectorial  molar  contained  in  a  small  jaw-fragment.  The  tooth  is 
about  the  size  of  that  of  the  Bengal  tiger,  and  is  therefore  too  large  to  have 
belonged  either  to  the  panther  or  the  jaguar.  It  is  as  much  too  small  to 
have  belonged  to  the  extinct  American  lion,  or  Felis  atrox,  as  its  l)Veadth  is 
but  little  greater  than  the  sectorial  molar  contained  in  tlie  lower  jaw  from 
which  the  latter  was  described.  The  form  of  the  tooth  is  the  same  as  in  the 
American  panther  and  Bengal  tiger.  The  breadth  of  the  crown  is  slightly 
less,  and  its  thickness  proportionately  greater  than  in  the  corresponding  teeth 
of  a  skull  of  the  latter  with  which  the  fossil  was  compared. 


228 


If  the  upper  sectorial  molar  of  Fells  atrox  had  the  same  proportionate  size 
to  the  lower  one  as  in  the  Bengal  tiger  and  other  feline  animals,  it  measured 
nearly  an  inch  and  three-fourths  in  breadth.  That  of  the  Loup  Fork  fossil 
is  a  little  over  an  inch  and  a  quarter  in  breadth.  From  the  difference  iu  size 
thus  indicated  between  the  sectorial  molar  of  the  Loup  Fork  fossil  and  that  of 
the  previously  described  largest  American  cats,  recent  and  extinct,  we -may 
fairly  regard  the  specimen  as  characteristic  of  another  species,  for  which  the 
'name  heading  this  chapter  has  been  proposed. 

Comparative  measurements  of  the  upper  sectorial  molar  are  as  follows — 
those  from  Fells  atrox  being  estimated,  and  that  from  the  jaguar  being  taken 
from  Plate  XIV  of  De  Biainville's  Osteographie: 


Upper  sectorial  molar. 

F.  concolor. 

F.  onfa. 

F.  augustus. 

F.  tigiis. 

F.  atrox. 

Breadth  of  crown 

Tliif'lcnp.ss  in  front        

Lilies. 
11 
5J 

Lines. 
12 

Lines. 

15J 

8 

Lines. 

16 

Lines. 
20 
10 

Another  Specimen,  represented  in  Fig.  18,  Plate  VII,  consisting  of  a  frag- 
ment of  a  premaxillary  retaining  the  second  incisor,  the  first  alveolus,  and  part 
of  the  last  one,  agrees  in  size  and  other  characters  with  the  corresponding 
part  in  the  Bengal  tiger. 

The  remaining  specimens  are  fragments  of  an  upper  last  premolar  and  of  a 
canine  from  the  same  individual. 

A  specimen,  represented  in  Fig.  24,  Plate  XX,  found  by  Professor  Hayden 
on  the  Niobrara  River,  but  not  in  proximity  with  the  preceding,  consists  of 
the  distal  extremity  of  a  humerus,  probably  of  the  same  animal.  It  has 
about  the  same  size,  proportions,  and  form  as  in  the  corresponding  part  of 
the  arm-bone  of  the  Bengal  tiger.  Its  diameter  at  the  supracondyles  is  3| 
inches  ;  the  breadth  of  the  articular  surface  in  front  is  2|  inches.  The  hole 
for  the  brachial  blood-vessels  and  accompanying  nerve  is  quite  evident,  though 
the  bony  bridge  defining  it  is  broken. 

Felis  imperialis. 

Among  a  collection  of  fossils  belonging  to  the  cabinet  of  Wabash  College, 
Crawfordsville,  Indiana,  purchased  from  Dr.  Lorenzo  Y.  Yates,  of  Centreville, 
Alameda  County,  California,  there  are  several  which  were  kindly  loaned  to 


229 


mc  for  investigation.  The  specimens  consist  of  jaw-fragments  of  a  large 
wolf  and  tiger. 

Professor  E.  O.  Hovey  writes  me  that  they  are  part  of  a  collection  of  fossil- 
bones  which  were  obtained  from  a  wash  in  the  side  of  a  hill  about  twenty- 
five  miles  inland  from  San  Leandro,  California. 

The  fossils  are  not  petrified,  and  indeed  have  undergone  almost  no  altera- 
tion, and  are  probably  quaternary. 

The  fossil  pertaining  to  a  tiger  consists  of  an  upper-jaw  fragment,  repre- 
sented in  Fig.  3,  Plate  XXXI,  one  half  size.  It  contains  the  second  pre- 
molar, and  retains  the  alveolus  of  the  one  in  advance  and  that  of  the  canine. 

The  specimen  indicates  a  species  as  large  as  the  largest  living  Bengal  tiger, 
and,  indeed,  is  slightly  larger  than  the  corresponding  part  of  the  largest  spec- 
imen of  a  skull  among  many  in  the  Academy  Museum  of  Philadelphia. 

The  proportions  of  the  specimen  indicate  a  larger  animal  than  the  extinct 
Fells  augustus^  as  represented  by  the  fossil-fragments  from  the  Niobrara 
River  of  Nebraska.  They  also  indicate  an  animal  as  much  smaller  than  the 
extinct  F  atrox,  as  represented  by  the  ramus  of  a  lower  jarw  found  in  associ- 
ation with  remains  of  the  Mastodon  americnnus  and  Megalonyx  Jeffersoni, 
near  Natchez,  Mississippi,  as  the  Bengal  tiger  is  compared  with  the  latter. 

Taking  into  consideration  the  extent  of  variation  in  size  of  the  same 
species,  there  can  be  no  question  that  the  California  fossil  might  pertain  to 
either  the  Felis  augustns  or  the  jP.  atrox.  Its  associations  might  aid  in  the 
determination  whether  it  was  either  of  these,  or  whether  it  is  distinct.  If 
found  in  association  with  remains  of  Alastodon  americanus,  it  might  reason- 
ably be  supposed  to  pertain  to  a  smaller  individual  of  Felis  alrox ;  if  with 
any  of  the  peculiar  species  of  the  Niobrara  fauna,  it  might  be  supposed  to  be 
a  larger  individual  of  F.  augustus. 

Comparative  measuremeuts  of  the  fossil  with  the  corresponding  portion  of 
the  skull  of  a  large  Bengal  tiger  from  Hindostan  are  as  follows : 


Fossil. 

Bengal 
tiger. 

Space  occupied  by  the  upper  premolars  and  canine 

Lines. 
34.0 
21.8 
1-J.  2 
14.0 

Lines. 
33.  .5 

From  back  of  lust  premolar  to  canine  alveolus    

19.0 

Antero-posterior  diameter  of  second  premolar 

12.0 

Diameter  of  canine  alveolus     .     .       . .       '. 

13.5 

• 

230 


CANIS. 

Can  IS    INDIANENSIS. 

The  fossil  specimen  pertaining  to  a  wolf  consists  of  the  right  ramus  of  a 
lower  jaw,  represented  in  Fig.  2,  Plate  XXXI.  The  specimen  indicates  an 
animal  larger  than  any  individuals  of  tiie  recent  wolves  of  North  America 
and  Europe,  as  represented  by  skulls  I  have  had  the  opportunity  of  examin- 
ing in  our  Museum  of  the  Academy.  It,  however,  indicates  a  less  robust 
animal  than  that  formerly  described  by  me  under  the  name  of  Canis  primcevus, 
and  subsequently  as  C.  indianensis,  from  an  ujjper-jaw  fragment,  found  in 
association  with  reiliains  of  Megalonyx,  &c.,  on  the  banks  of  the  Ohio  River, 
Indiana. 

The  specimen  likewise  indicates  a  less  robust  species  than  the  C  Haydeni, 
of  the  Pliocene  formation  of  the  Niobrara  River,  but  a  larger  one  than  C. 
scevus,  of  the  same  formation. 

I  am  disposed  to  view  the  specimen  as  pertaining  to  the  C  indianensis, 
and  perhaps  it  was  not  different  from  the  existing  C.  occidentalis. 

Measurements  of  the  fossil,  in  comjiarison  with  those  of  the  skull  of  a  large 
wolf  from  the  Columbia  River,  Oregon,  and  of  another  from  Germany,  are  as 
follows : 


Fossil 
jaw. 


Oregon 
wolf. 


European 
wolf. 


Length  of  jaw  from  condyle  to  fore  part  of  canine 

Beptli  of  jawat  condyle 

Depth  of  jaw  at  corouoid  process 

Depth  of  jaw  at  sectorial  molar 

Depth  of  jaw  at  second  i^remolar 

Length  of  molar  series  with  caniue . .  „ 

Length  of  molar  series 

Anteroposterior  diameter  sectorial  molar 

Anteroposterior  diameter  caniue 


Lines. 
96.0 
21.2- 
40.0 
18.0 
16.  G 
66.»0 
54.0 
16.4 
8.4 


Lines. 

90.0 
20.5 
36.4 
17.0 
14.0 
61.  0 
50.0 
14.6 
6.8 


Lilies. 

86.0 
20.5 
37.  5 
15.0 
12.5 
55.4 
45.0 
14.3 
6.2 


LUTRA  ? 

A  specimen  of  a  tibia,  submitted  to  my  inspection  l)y  the  Smithsonian 
Institution,  is  represented  in  Fig.  4,  Plate  XXXI.  It  was  presented  by 
Clarence  King,  and  was  obtained  by  him  on  Sinker  Creek,  Idaho,  in  associ- 
ation with  remains  of  Equus  excehus  and  Mastodon  mirificus. 


231 

The  tibia  pertains  to  a  carnivore,  and  resembles  Ihat  of  an  otter  more  than 
that  of  any  other  animal  witii  which  I  have  an  opportunity  of  comparing  it. 
Its  differences,  excepting  size,  are  trifling.  The  tubercle  for  insertion  of  the 
quadriceps  extensor  is  less  prominent,  so  as  to  give  the  head  of  the  bone  pro- 
portionately less  thickness  in  relation  with  its  breadth.  The  ridge  for  the 
•attachment  of  the  interosseous  membrane  at  the  lower  part  of  the  bone  is 
more  prominent  and  sharper.  The  distal  end  in  front  just  above  the- articu- 
lation is  flatter,  and  the  groove  for  the  flexor  tendons  behind  is  deeper. 

Liues. 

Length  of  the  bone  internally 50 

Width  of  the  head 1.5 

Thickness  at  the  inner  condyle lOA 

Width  of  the  distal  end  between  the  most  prominent  points , 11 

Thickness  at  the  inner  malleole 8 

Order  Proboscidea. 
MASTODON. 

Mastodon  obscurus. 

Besides  the  well-known  American  mastodon,  M.  americaniis,  of  the  post- 
Tertiary  period,  there  appear  to  have  been  at  least  three  others  which  in- 
habited this  continent.  Characteristic  remains  of  a  species,  to  which  the 
name  of  M.  mirijicvfi  was  given,  were  discovered  by  Professor  Hayden,  in 
association  with  an  abundance  of  remains  of  many  other  extinct  animals  in 
the  Pliocene  formation  of  the  Lonp  Fork  of  Platte  River,  Nebraska.  Re- 
mains also,  apparently  of  the  same  species  as  the  South  American  M.  andium, 
have  been  foOnd  in  Central  America.  For  an  account  of  the  remains  of  the 
two  species  last  named,  the  reader  is  referred  to  the  "Extinct  Mammalian 
Fauna  of  Dakota  and  Nebraska." 

In  the  Mnseum  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia, 
there  is  a  cast  in  plaster  of  a  mastodon  tooth,  the  original  of  which  is  nsputed 
to  have  been  found  in  the  Miocene  formation  of  Maryland.  The  original 
specimen  having  been  lost,  the  cast  is  represented  in  Fig.  13,  Plate  XXVII. 
of  t-he  work  just  named.  This,  together  with  the  fragment  of  a  similar 
tooth,  represented  in  Fig.  1 6,  of  the  same  plate,  has  been  taken  in  evidence 
of  the  existence  of  a  fourth  species,  to  which  the  name  of  M.  ohsatrus  has 
been  given. 

Dr.  Lorenzo  G.  Yates,  of  Centreville,  Alameda  County,  California,  has 
communicated  to  the  writer  a  list  of  localities  in  which  he  has  discovered  re- 


232  ■  . 

iiiaiufi  of  mastodons  in  that  Stale.  Specimens  collected  by  him  were  sent  to 
Professor  C  U.  Shrpurd,  of  Ainlierst,  Massachusetts,  who  has  submitted 
them  to  the  examination  of  the  author. 

One  of  the  specimens,  a  last  inferior  molar  tooth,  represented  in  Figs.  1,  2, 
Plate  XXI,  was  found  together  with  the  mutilated  lower  jaw  and  upper  molars, 
at  Oak  Springs,  in  Contra  Costa  County.  The  remains  were  obtained  from 
the  rock  at  the'  base  of  one  of  the  rounded  hills,  of  Tertiary  age,  mentioned 
in  Professor  Whitney's  Geological  Survey  of  California,  p.  32,  stretching 
along  near  the  edge  of  the  San  Joaquin  plain.  According  to  Mr.  William  M. 
Gabb,  the  formation  belongs  to  the  PHocene  Tertiary  period. 

A  small  photograph,  sent  to  me  by  Dr.  Yates,  exhibits  the  lower  jaw  with- 
out the  ascending  portions-  behind,  and  with  straight  tusks  projecting  with  an 
upwar-d  direction.  The  tusks  appear  to  be  as  long  as  the  jaw  was  in  its  com- 
plete condition. 

The  molar  tootli  has  the  same  general  form  and  constitution  as  the  corre- 
sponding one  of  the  American  mastodon,  but  is  smaller  than  is  usual  in  this 
species.  It  resembles  the  plaster-cast  above  mentioned  sufficiently  to  render 
it  pi'obable  that  it  belonged  to  the  same  animal. 

The  crown  of  the  tooth  is  composed  of  four  transverse  pyramidal  ridges, 
each  consisting  of  a  pair  of  lobes,  and  conjoined  in  a  common,  broad,  low 
base,  without  a  conspicuous  offset- or  heel.  As  in  the  cast  of  the  Maryland 
tooth,  the  inner  lol^es  are  more  mammillary  or  less  angular  than  in  M.  ameri- 
canus.  In  this  respect  they  approach  the  condition,  even  more  marked,  how- 
ever, in  the  M.  angustidens  of  Eui'ope,  and  they  are  well  separated  to  their 
base  as  in  M.  americamis.  The  outer  lobes  of  the  crown  have  the  same  form 
as  in  the  latter,  but  are  provided  with  distinct  offsets  projecting  from  their 
inner  part  fore  and  aft.  The  contiguous- offsets  come  into  contact,  and  thus 
obstruct  the  transverse  valleys  of  the  crown.  This  arrangement  accords 
with  that  of  the  cast  of  the  Maryland  tootli.  In  M.  ^wmcrtwws  similar  offsets 
from  the  outer  lobes  are  usually  but  feebly  developed,  and  scarcely  obstruct 
the  bottoms  of  the  ti^ansverse  valleys. 

The  enamel  worn  from  the  summits  of  the  anterior  of  the  inner  lobes 
leaves  a  transverse  ellipsoidal  cup  of  exposed  dentine,  as  usual  in  the  same 
position  in  the  American  mastodon.  A  greater  degree  of  wearing  on  the 
corresponding  outer  lobes  has  produced  quadrilobate  excavations  of  dentine, 
in  which  the  specimen  agrees  with  the  plaster-cast.  In  the  same  stage  of 
wear  in  M.  ainericaniis,  the  excavations  have  a  more  lozenge-like  outline. 


233 


Tlic  anterior  three  divisions  of  tlie  crown  arc  nearly  alike  in  size  and  con- 
struction. The  fourth  division  is  less  well  developed,  and  consists  of  a  pair 
of  conical  lobes,  but  the  inner  is  much  smaller  than  the  other,  and  is  connate,, 
with  a  supplemental  lube  in  advance.  Back  of  these  there  is  a  small  conical 
tubercle,  corresponding  with  the  heel  or  rudimental  fifth  division  of  the  crown 
in  M.  americanus. 

In  the  plaster-cast  of  the  Maryland  tooth,  the  fourth  division  of  the  crown 
consists  of  a  pair  of  nearly  equal  conical  lobes,  embracing  a  smaller  pair 
at  their  fore  part.  Behind  these  there  is  a  pair  of  conical  tubercles  corre- 
^nding  \yith  the  single  one  in  the  California  tooth.  The  ditlerences  indi- 
cated between  the  posterior  extremity  of  the  crown  of  the  latter  and  the 
cast  of  the  Maryland  tooth  are  not  greater  than  those  observed  between  the 
same  teeth  of  diflferent  individuals  of  M.  americanus,  and  are  therefore  unim- 
portant as  distinctive  characters. 

Well-developed  elements  of  a  basal  ridge,  in  the  California  tooth,  occupy 
the  outer  fore  part  of  the  crown  and  the  intervals  of  the  outer  lobes.  Between 
the  posterior  three  divisions  of  the  crown  they  are  better  marked  than  in  the 
cast  of  the  Maryland  tooth,  or  even  than  is  usually  the  condition  in  the 
American  mastodon.  The  ridge  is  also  distinctly  produced  around  the  outer 
part  of  the  third  and  fourth  external  lobes  and  the  back  of  the  crown,  which 
is  not  the  case  in  the  cast,  nor  usually  in  M.  americanus. 

The  jaw-fragment  containing  the  tooth  is  too  much  mutilated  to  ascertain 
anything  of  importance  in  regard  to  it,  other  than  that  it  measured  about  6.^ 
inches  in  depth  at  the  fore  part. 

.  Comparative  measurements  of  the  California  tooth,  the  cast  of  the  Mary- 
land tooth,  and  two  teeth  of  M.  americanus  are  as  follows  : 


California. 

MaryhuKl. 

M.  americauns. 

Female. 

Male." 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  crowu    

Breadth  at  anterior  tliree  ridges 

Breadth  at  fourth  ridge 

Height  of  third  inner  lobe,  unworn 

Lines. 
75 
33 
25 
25 
10 
■      24 

Lines. 
75 
33 
28 
26 
20 
22 

LAncs. 
75 
38-42 
33 
28 
20 
22 

Lines. 

90 

41-45 

39 

34 

Height  of  fourth  inner  lobe 

30 

Height  of  fourth  outer  lobe 

30 

'  The  8i>ecimeu  of  the  tooth  of  a  male  has  iive  transverse  divisions  to  the  crown  in  addition  to  a  small 


heel. 


30  G 


.     234 

The  second  specimen  received  from  Professor  Sliepard  consists  of  the 
fragment  of  a  tusk,  from  Dry  Creek,  Stanislaus  County,  California.  It  was 
discovered  by  Dr.  Yates  imbedded  in  the  bluff  of  a  hill,  about  ten  feet  above 
the  bed  of  the  creek.  The  hill,  upward  of  a  hundred  feet  in  height,  is  one 
of  those  mentioned  in  Professor  Whitney's  Geological  Sux-vey  as  being 
scattered  over  the  San  Joaquin  plain,  at  the  base  of  the  foot-hills  of  the 
Sierra  Nevada. 

The  specimen  is  represented  in  Figs.  3,  4,  Plate  XXI,  and  is  remarkable 
from  its  exhibiting  characters  which  indicate  the  species  to  have  been  nearly 
related  with  the  Mastodon  augustidens  of  Europe.  The  molar  tooth  frdit 
Contra  Costa  County,  likewise  presents  a  form  which  approximates  it  to  the 
same  animal,  so  that  it  is  probable  both  specimens  may  belong  to  the  same 
species. 

The  fragment  is  six  inches  long,  sliglitly  curved  in  two  directions,  and  in 
transverse  section  (Fig.  3)  is  ovate,  with  the  anterior  pole  acute.  The  pulp- 
cavity,  opening  half  the  diameter  of  the  tusk  at  its  larger  broken  end,  extends 
half  the  length  of  the  specimen.  On  one  side  of  the  tusk,  as  in  Mastodon 
augustidens,  there  is  a  broad  layer  of  enamel,  which  extends  from  the  acute 
border  two-thirds  the  width  of  the  specimen.  The  enamel  is  somewhat 
rugose,  and  is  two-thirds  of  a  line  thick.  In  one  position,  near  the  smaller  end 
of  tlie  fragment,  it  has  been  worn  through  irregularly  for  the  extent  of  about  1 J 
inches.  The  convex  or  thicker  border  of  the  tusk  has  also  been  worn  off  to 
an  extent  of  two-fifths  of  the  surface.  The  broken  ends  of  the  fragment  exjiibit 
the  usual  decussating  lines  of  structure  of  the  dentine  so  characteristic  of 
the  ivory  of  the  great  proboscidians. 

The  entire  length  of  the  tusk  appears  to  have  approximated  two  feet.  The 
other  dimensions  are  as  follows  : 

Linos. 

Long  diameter  of  the  larger  extremity 28 

Short  diaTueter  of  the  larger  extremity 19 

Long  diameter  of  the  .smaller  extremity  22 

Short  diameter  of  the  smaller  extremity IG 

Breadth  of  enamel  layer  at  larger  extremity 22 

Breadth  of  enamel  layer  at  smaller  extremity 19 

In  the  form  of  the  tusk  and  the  possession  of  an  enamel  band  it  resembles 
the  same  organ  in  the  Mastodon  augustidens.  The  specimen  when  first  de- 
scribed was  viewed  as  probably  representing  a  species  distinct  from  that  to 
which  the  Contra  Costa  specimens  pertained,  and  was  therefore  referred  to  an 


235 

animal  with   the  name  of   Mastodon   Shcjmrdi,  in   honor  ot"  Professor  C.  U. 
Siicpard. 

Since  writing  the  above,  I  have  received  another  specimen  from  Professor 
Shepard,  consisting  of  a  last  inferior  molar  tooth,  obtained  hy  Dr.  Yates  in 
Contra  Costa  County,  California.  It  is  almost  identical  in  form  and  size  with 
the  one  previously  described  from  the  same  locality,  but  appears  to  have  l)e- 
longed  to  an  older  individual,  as  indicated  by  the  more  worn  condition. 

From  the  Smithsonian  Institution  I  have  recently  I'eceived  for  examination 
some  remains  of  a  mastodon  and  an  elephant,  which  were  found  near  Santa 
Fe,  New  Mexico,  and  were  presented  to  the  institution  by  the  Hon.  W.  F. 
M.  Arny.  The  mastodon  remains  consist  of  three  fragments  of  a  lower  jaw, 
a  vertebral  body,  and  a  rib-fragment.  They  are  white,  and  from  adherent  jior- 
tions  of  matrix  appear  to  have  been  imbedded  in  an  indurated  clay.  The 
cancellated  structure  of  the  bones  is  filled  with  the  same  matter  together 
with  crystalline  calcite. 

The  lower-jaw  fragments  appear  all  to  have  pertained  to  the  same  specimen. 
One  of  them,  repi'esented  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  XXII,  consists  of  a  portion  of  the 
right  ramus  containing  the  last  molar  tooth  nearly  of  the  size  of  the  corre- 
sponding part  in  the  American  mastodon.  The  molar  tooth,  represented  in 
Fig.  4  of  the  same  plate,  has  lost  the  portion  back  of  the  third  ridge  of  the 
crown.  The  portion  preserved  sufficiently  resembles  in  its  construction  the 
corresponding  portion  of  the  California  tooth  above  described  to  behmg  to 
the  same  species,  which  I  suspect  actually  to  he  the  case.  It  also  resembles 
more  nearly  the  corresponding  portion  of  the  same  tooth  of  M.  augustidens 
of  Europe  than  it  does  that  of  the  M.  americanus. 

The  other  jaw-fragments,  represented  in  Figs.  2,  3,  form  together  the 
anterior,  extremity  of  an  enormously  prolonged  symphysis,  like  that  of  J/. 
augvstidens.  The  specimen  is  rather  more  than  a  foot  in  length,  and  contains 
jiortions  of  tusks  extending  through  the  pieces  and  broken  ofl"  on  a  level  with 
the  extremities  of  the  .symphysis.  This  has  been  somewhat  crushed  laterally, 
so  as  to  disarrange  the  proper  relative  position  of  the  two  tusks.  It  is  ot 
nearly  uniform  width,  but  widens  at  the  posterior  extremity.  Below,  it  is 
slightly  convex  or  nearly  straight  longitudinally,  and  is  depressed  along  the 
median  line.  The  sides  are  convex,  and  extend  upward  in  ridges  which  form 
the  boundaries  of  a  deep  groove  at  the  upper  part  of  the  symphysis.  The 
groove  is  narrower  behind,  and  becomes  shallow  in  front.     The  tusks  are 


23() 

slightly  compressed  cylindrical,  and  curved  in  their  course.  They  are  oval  in 
transverse  section,  with  the  long  diameter  directed  from  within  upward  and 
outward.  They  are  unprovided  with  enamel,  and  at  the  broken  ends  exhibit 
the  decussating  curved  lines  of  structure  of  the  ivory  enveloped  in  a  thick 
layer  of  dense  cementum.  At  the  posterior  extremity  the  broken  ends  ex- 
hibit the  pulp-cavity  occupied  with  matrix  and  surrounded  with  a  margin  of 
about  a  line  in  thickness,  so  that  the  symphysis  is  broken  off  near  the  bottom 
of  the  incisive  alveoli. 

Frooi  the  thinning  of  the  anterior  alveolar  borders  of  the  symphysis  it 
would  appear  as  if  the  latter  was  nearly  complete,  so  that  if  we  Siippose  the 
lower  tusks  projected  about  6  inches  from  the  jaw,  it  would  give  them  an 
entire  length  of  about  20  inches. 

The  breadth  of  the  fore  part  of  the  symphysis,  in  its  complete  condition, 
is  rather  more  than  5  inches.  At  the  back  part,  corresponding  with  ttie  posi- 
tion of  the  bottom  of  the  incisive  alveoli,  it  has  been  about  an  inch  wider. 

The  long  diameter  of  the  tusks,  at  their  anterior  broken  ends,  is  about  20 
lines;  the  short  diameter  17  lines.  These  diameters  are  nearly  uniform 
throughout  as  existing  in  the  specimen. 

The  fore  and  aft  diameter  of  the  last  molar  tooth,  when  complete,  is  esti- 
mated to  have  been  full  (ij  inches.  The  width  of  the  crown  at  the  base  of 
the  second  and  third  ridges  is  35  lines.  The  measurements  indicate  the  pro- 
portioBS  of  the  tooth  to  be  slightly  greater  than  in  the  corresponding  Califor- 
nia tooth  or  the  cast  of  the  Maryland  toyth. 

The  depth  of  the  lower  jaw  below  the  second  ridge  of  the  last  molar  is  6^ 
inches ;  and  the  thickness  is  5  inches. 

I  think  it  probable,  without  being  positive  in  the  matter,  that  the  Masto- 
don remains  above  described,  which  have  been  referred  to  species  under  the 
names  of  Mastodon  ob.scurus  and  M.  Shepardi,  including  those  from  New  Mex- 
ico, belong  to  one  and  the  same  species.  This,  from  the  form  of  the  molar 
teeth,  the  constitution  of  the  upper  tusks,  and  the  prolonged  symphysis  of 
the  lower  jaw,  was  clearly  a  near  relation  of  the  Mastodon  augustidens  of 
Europe. 

In  a  note,  on  page  74,  of  volume  II,  of  the  Palaeontological  Memoirs  of  the 
late  Dr.  Falconer,  it  is  stated  that  at  Genoa  he  had  seen  a  cast  of  a  lower  jaw 
of  a  mastod'on  from  Mexico,  with  an  enormous  iec  abruptly  deflected  down- 
ward, and  containing  one  very  large  incisor.     The  beak  is  much  thicker  than  in 


237 

M.  augusUdens  and  larger  than  in  M.  loitgirostris.  •  ".The  outline  of  the  jaw  re- 
sembles very  uuich  the  figiira  in  D'Orliigny's  voyage,  descriljed  by  Laurillard 
as  M.  andium.  The  Genoese  paleontologists  had  named  it  lihynchotherium, 
from  the  enormous  development  of  the  beak,  approaching  Dinotherium.'' 

Perhaps  this  Mexican  specimen  of  a  lower  jaw  may  pertain  to  the  same 
species  as  the  specimens  above  described,  though  tlie  beak  of  the  New  Mex- 
ican specimen  is  unlike  that  of  the  figure  above  alluded  to  in  tiie  work  of 
D'Orbigny. 

The  vertebral  body  and  rib-fragment  accompanying  the  jaw-fragments  from 
New  Mexico  present  nothing  remarkable.  The  former  is  of  a  lumbar  verte- 
bra, and  would  indicate  an  animal  about  as  large  as  the  living  Asiatic  elephant. 
Its  length  is  34  lines;  its  breadth  is  about-5  inches  at  the  posterior  border; 
and  its  height  is  3^  inches. 

Mastodon  mirificus. 

Some  small  fragments  of  jaws  and  teeth,  apparently  referable  to  this  species, 
in  the  museum  of  the  Smithsonian  Institution,  were  obtained  by  Mr.  Clarence. 
King,  from  Sinker  Creek,  Idaho. 

Mastodon  amkricanus. 

Among  a  collection  of  remains  of  the  American  mastodon,  from  Benton 
County,  Missouri,  deposited  in  the  museum  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
of  Philadelphia  by  the  American  Philosophical  Society,  there  is  a  singular' 
tooth,  which  I  suppose  to  be  of  abnormal  character  and  to  pertain  to  the 
Mastodon  americanus.  The  specimen  is  in  the  same  state  of  preservation  as 
the  associated  remains,  and  is  repre.sented  in  Figs.  5  and  6,  Plate  XXII.  It 
consists  of  the  complete  crown  of  a  molar  tooth  without  the  fangs.  Its  shape 
is  so  peculiar  that  I  can  form  no  clear  idea  as  to  the  relative  position  it  occu- 
pied in  the  jaws,  or  as  to  its  homologous  character  in  comparison  with  normal 
teeth. 

The  crown  in  transverse  outline  is  irregularly  oblong  oval,  more  bulging 
on  one  side  than  the  other,  and  somewhat  prolonged  at  the  extremities.  From 
a  thick  expanded  base  there  project  four  conical  lobes,  of  which  the  interme- 
diate two  are  nearly  equal  and  nearly  twice  the  size  of  the  others,  also  nearly 
equal  in  size.  The  basal  ridge  on  the  more  prominent  side  of  the  crown  is 
mammillated,  and  twice  the  depth  that  it  is  upon  the  other  side,  in  which 
l)Osition  it  is  comparatively  smooth. 


238 

The  long  diameter  of  the  crown  is  55  lines ;  the  short  diameter,  29  lines. 

A  small  collection  of  fossil  teeth,  from  near  Pittstown,  on  the  Susquehanna 
River,  in  Luzerne  County,  Pennsylvania,  now  jjreservecl  in  the  Museum  of  the 
Academy  of  Natural  Sciences,  is  of  interest  on  account  of  the  association. 
The  specimens  consist  of  two  molai's  of  Equus  major^  hereafter  described,  a 
molar  of  Bison  kU/frons,.£dso  to  be  described,  and  three  first  premolars,  ap- 
parently from  as  many  different  individuals  of  Mastodon  americaiius.  Of  these 
one  is  represented,  of  the  natural  size,  in  Fig.  9,  Plate  XXVIII. 

ELEPHAS. 
Elephas  americanus. 

In  the  preceding  account  of  the  remains  of  mastodon  from  near  Santa 
Fe,  New  Mexico,  those  of  an  elephant  are  referred  to  which  were  found 
in  association  with  them.  There  is  but  one  specimen,  consisting  of  the  back 
part  of  a  molar  tooth,  apparently  the  last  upper  one.  It  is  composed  of  eight 
unworn  lobes,  decreasing  successively  in  length.  They  present  the  ordinary 
thin,  elongated,  palmate  appearance,  with  the  digitate  extremities  curving  for- 
ward and  ending  in  manimillary  points.  The  eight  plates  occupy  a  space 
of  4|  inches.  The  second  of 'the  .plates  is  3f  inches  broad  near  the  middle,- 
and  when  entire  was  upward  of  7  inches  in  length. 

The  specimen  is  insufficient  to  determine  whether  it  pertained  to  a  species 
different  from  the  ordinary  Eleplias  amei-icanus,  and  it  presents  nothing  pecu- 
liar. The  thickness  of  the  lobes,  or  double  plates,  indicates  the  coarse-plated 
variety  of  teetli  of  the  American  elephant,  named  by  Dr.  Falconer  Elephas 
columhi. 

Since  the  above  was  written  I  have  received;  from  the  Smithsonian  Insti- 
tution, for  examination  some  remains  of  an  elephant  from  Chihuahua.  Pro- 
fessor Baird  rej)orts  that  the  remains  came  from  an  ancient  lagoon-bed  at 
Potos  Spring,  seventy-five  miles  south  of  El  Paso,  Texas,  and  were  presented 
to  the  institution  by  General  Carleton,  United  States  Army. 

The  specimens  consist  of  fragments  of  molar  teeth  with  adherent  gravel, 
and  with  the  exterior  cementum  much  worn  away  by  water  action.  Tliey 
indicate  the  coarse-plated  variety  of  teeth  of  the  American  elephant.  One 
of  the  better  preserved  specimens  consists  of  the  fore  part  of  a  last  lower 
molar  about  one-third  worn  down.  It  comprises  about  eight  lobes,  or  double 
plates,  included  in  a  space  of  5|  inches.     The  width  of  the  sixth  lobe  is  3*f 


239 

inches.     The  first  lobe  is  nearly  obliterated,  and  its  back  plate  conjoins  tlie 
contiguous  one  of  the  second  lobe. 

Another  specimen  consists  of  the  ])ack  part  of  a  molar  with  six  lobes, 
occupying  a  space  of  nearly  4^  inches.  The  lobes  exhibit  the  same  narrow, 
elongated,  palniated  form,  with  curved  digitate  extremities,  as  in  the  molar 
fragment  from  New  Mexico.  The  first  of  the  six  lol)es  is  worn  off  at  the 
summits  of  the  digitate  ends.  The  others  are  unworn,  and  the  second  plate 
is  3|  inches  wide  near  its  middle. 

MEGACEROPS. 

Megaceeops  coloradensis.  ■ 

An  imperfectly  known  extinct  animal,  which  was  supposed  to  be  related 
with  the  great  ruminant,  the  Sivatherium  of  the  Tertiary  formation  of  the 
Sewalik  Hills  of  India,  is  indicated  by  a  singular  looking  fossil  discovered  in 
Colorado.  The  specimen  belonged  to  Dr.  Gehrung,  of  Colorado  City,  by 
whom  it  was  presented  to  Professor  Hayden.  It  is  represented  one-half  the 
natural  size  in  Figs.  2,  3,  Plate  I,  and  Fig.  2,  Plate  II,  and  was  originally 
described  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Phila- 
delphia for  January,  1870,  under  the  name  heading  this  article. 

The  fossil  is  singularly  puzzling  in  its  character,  and  possesses  so  little  in 
common  with  the  homologous  portion  in  ordinary  animals  that  its  relation- 
ship would  have  remained  unknown,  or  entirely  conjectural,  had  we  not  been 
previously  acquainted  with  the  Sivatherium.  The  specimen  appears  to  cor- 
respond with  that  portion  of  the  face  of  the  latter  which  comprises  the  upper 
part  of  the  nose,  together  with  the  forehead  and  the  anterior  horn-cores.  As 
is  described  to  be  the  condition  in  the  corresponding  portion  of  the  skull  of 
Sivatherium,  all  the  bones  entering  into  the  constitution  of  the  fossil  are 
completely  co-ossified,  so  as  to  leave  no  traces  of  the  original  course  of  the 
sutures.  The  nasal  and  contiguous  bones  arc  of  great  thickness,  and  as  solid 
as  those  generally  in  the  living  Sirenians. 

The  horn-cores  of  the  Colorado  fossil  resemble  the  anterior  ones  of  Siva- 
therium both  in  form  and  relative  position.  They  are  large,  dense,  conical 
knobs,  somewhat  trilateral,  and  with  a  rounded,  dome-like  smnmit,  which  is 
more  porous  on  the  surface  than  any  other  part  of  the  fossil.  They  are 
nearly  straight,  and  divergent  from  each  other,  and  their  summits  project 
more  over  their  base  externally  than  in  Sivatheriinn. 


240 

The  space  between  the  horn-cores  extending  across  the  forehead  forms  a 
deep  concavity  divergent  outwardly.  The  surface  of  the  forehead  from  the 
broken  border  of  the  specimen  behind  to  the  end  of  tlie  nasals  forms  a  mod- 
erate uninterrupted  convexity.  In  Sivatherium,  the  rhinoceros,  and  the  tapir, 
the  corresponding  surface  is  interrupted  by  a  concavity  at  the  root  of  the  nose. 

The  face,  as  formed  by  the  nasals  and  tlicir  apparent  conjunction  with  the  • 
maxillaries  in  advance  of  the  position  of  the  horn-cores,  is  exceedingly  short 
in  comparison  with  the  corresponding  part  in  Sivatherium  and  the  rliinoceros, 
and  is  more  like  that  in  the  tapir. 

The  nasals  together  form  a  strong,  thick,  tongue-like  process,  projecting 
free  from  their  conjunction  with  the  frontals  in  advance  of  the  horn-cores. 
The  overhanging  process  of  the  nose  is  proportionately  wider,  thicker,  and 
longer  than  that  of  Sivatherium.  Its  upper  surface  is  not  vaulted  as  in  the 
latter  and  the  rhinoceros,  but  simply  continues  the  convexity  of  the  forehead. 
The  lateral  margins  are  sqmewhat  expanded,  (not  sufficiently  expressed  in 
Fig.  2,  Plate  I,)  and  are  thinner  than  elsewhere.  Tlie  end  is  thicker  than  at 
the  sides,  is  more  obtuse  than  in  Sivatlierium  or  the  tapir,  and  is  roughened 
and  porous,  probably  to  have  given  firmer  attachment  to  a  proboscis.  A 
notch  occupies  the  extremity  of  the  obliterated  internasal  suture. 

One  of  the  most  remarkable  characters  of  the  Colorado  fossil  is  the  great 
comparative  extent  of  the  lateral  nasal  notch.  It  not  only  exceeds  that  of 
Sivatherium,  but  also  that  of  the  rhinoceros  and  tapir.  In  the  former  its 
bottom  is  far  in  advance  of  the  position  of  the  lK)rn-cores,  and  in  the  rhi- 
noceros it  holds  nearly  the  same  relative  position.  In  the  tapir  the  notch 
extends  back  over  the  position  of  the  orbits.  In  the  Colorado  fossil  it 
extends  far  back  beneath  the  position  of  the  horn-cores,  wdiere  the  nasals 
apparently  conjoin  the  maxillaries.  The  relative  position  of  the  orbits  cannot 
be  ascertained  in  our  fossil,  as  all  the  contiguous  parts  are  broken  away. 
They  appear  as  if  they  had  been  situated  farther  posteriorly  in  relation  with 
the  position  of  the  horn-cores  than  in  Sivatherium.  The  horn-cores,  project- 
ing forward  and  outward,  overhang  a  large  recess,  which  would  appear  to 
have  been  just  in  advance  of  the  orbit,  and  is  situated  externally  above  and 
behind  the  lateral  nasal  notch. 

The  broad  and  stout  projecting  nasals  were  probably  intended  as  a  point 
of  attachment  for  a  movable  snout  or  proboscis,  intermediate  in  degree  of 
development  to  that  of  the  tapir  and  elephant  or  mastodon.     The  similar 


241 

constitution  of  the  nose  ot  SivHtlieriiuu  led  ils  (li.scoverei-  and  descriher,  Dr. 
Falconer,  to  attribute  a  like  prehensile  organ  to  tiiat  animal.  The  strength 
and  co-ossitication  of  the  nasals,  together  and  with  the  frontals  and  niaxilla- 
ries,  are  also  no  doubt  related  with  the  unusual  position  of  the  horn-cores,  just 
as  a  similar  condition  of  things  in  the  rhinoceros  is  related  with  the  support 
of  a  Iiorn  on  the  nose. 

^[(gacerops  coloradcnsis  is  estimated  to  have  approximated  two-thirds  the 
size  ot  the  Sivatherium  g'lganteum. 

Measurements  from  the  fossil  referred  to  Mpgacerops  coloradenus  are  as 
follows : 

luches.  Liues. 

Distauce  from  the  summit  ot  oue  horucore  to  tbe  otlicr ' 10        0 

Length  of  curve  between  the  same  two  poiuts I'j  10 

Length  of  Literal  nasal  notch  from  end  of  nasals 1         0 

Distauce  from  end  of  nasals  to  center  of  space  between  liorncores 0        0 

Breadth  of  nasals  2^  inches  behind  the  end 4        o 

Thickness  of  nasals  where  co-ossifiod  ... «  1        3 

Diameter  of  born-cores  2i  inches  from  summit  fore  and  aft 2  10 

Diameter  of  horn-cores  2^  inches  from  saiiuuit  transversely 2        5 

Breadth  of  face  below  born-cores  8        8 

Breadth  at  bottom  of  lateral  nasal  notches 5        6 

Since  writing  the  above,  I  have  recalled  to  mind  a  specimen  of  a  horn-core 
which  was  obtained  by  Dr.  John  Evans  from  the  Mauvaises  Terres  of  AVhite 
River,  Dakota,  and  which  is  noticed  in  the  account  of  Titanotherium,  on  page 
216  of  the  "  Extinct  Mammalian  Fauna  of  Dakota  and  Neliraska,"  The  ref- 
erence of  the  specimen  to  any  particular  animal  was  considered  very  uncer- 
tain, though  it  was  suspected  that  it  might  pertain  to  Titanotherium.  It  is 
now  represented  in  Fig.  3,  Plate  XXVIII,  and  is  seen  by  comparison  to  bear 
a  near  resemblance  to  the  horn-cores  of  Megacerops.  It  is  rather  larger  and 
slightly  more  tapering  and  curved  than  in  the  latter.  The  specimen  may, 
perhaps,  belong  to  another  species  of  Megacerops. 

Since  the  foregoing  was  written.  Professors  Marsh  and  Coi)c  have  repoiied 
the  discovery  of  i-emains  of  several  huge  nuimmals  in  the  Bridger  Tertiary 
beds,  which  they  have  described  under  the  names  of  Tinoceras,  Dinoceras, 
Eobasileus  and  Loxolophodon.  The  ordinal  relations  of  these  is  a  matter  of 
dispute,  and  it  is  a  question  especially  whether  they  are  proboscideans,  or  are 
representatives  of  a  previously  unknown  order.  One  of  their  most  remarkable 
pecuharities  is  the  possession  of  several  pairs  of  bony  jirotuberances  to  the 
skull,  which  are  viewed  as  horn-cores. 
31   G 


242 

In  a  recent  paper  cntilled  '-00  the  Gigantic  Fossil  Mammals  of  the  Order 
Diiiocerata,''  by  Professor  Marsh,  published  in  the  American  Journal  of  Sci- 
ence for  February,  1873,  there  is  a  representation  of  an  almost  complete  skull, 
described  under  the  name  of  Dinoceras  mirahilis.  This  skull,  which  appears 
to  agree  with  the  corresponding  parts,  including  the  teeth,  described  in  the 
preceding  pages  under  the  name  of  Uintatherium  rohustum^  is  represented 
with  three  pairs  of  bony  protuberances,  or  horn-cores.  In  comparing  the 
Colorado  fossil,  it  would  appear  that  the  lun-n-cores  accord  with  the  second 
pair  of  the  Wyoming  fossil,  in  which  they  are  seen  to  spring  from  the  upper 
part  of  the  maxillaries,  where  these  join  the  nasals. 

The  resemblance  between  the  si^ecimen  belonging  to  Megacerops  and  the 
skull  described  by  Professor  Marsh  renders  it  probable  that  the  former 
belongs  to  the  same  order,  instead  of  to  the  ruminants,  as  previously  sup- 
posed. 

Order  Solidungula. 

EQUUS. 

Equus  occidentalis. 

I  The  remains  of  equine  animals  which  of  late  years  have  been  discovered 
both  in  North  and  South  America  indicate  a  number  of  species  and  genera 
really  wonderful,  when  we  take  into  consideration  that  neither  continent  pos- 
sesses a  single  living  indigenous  species.  The  reiliains  from  many  parts  of 
North  America,  mainly  consisting  of  isolated  molar  teeth,  which  have  come 
under  my  observation,  exhibit  so  much  difference  in  size  and  variation  of  the. 
enamel- folding,  as  displayed  on  the  worn  triturating  surface,  that  in  many 
cases  I  have  fliiled  to  refer  them  to  species  with  any  degree  of  certainty. 

In  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia 
for  18(J5,  page  94,  I  have  given  a  notice  of  two  specimens  of  upper  molars 
from  California,  submitted  to  my  examination  by  Professor  J.  D.  Whitney, 
which  were  referred  to  a  species  uith  the  name  of  Equus  occidentalis.  One 
of  these  specimens  is  represented  in  Fig.  2,  Plate  XXXIII,  and  was  obtained 
from  auriferous  clay,  at  a  depth  of  thirty  feet  from  the  surface,  in  Tuolumne 
County,  Cahfornia. 

Subsequently,  in  the  same  Proceedings  for  1868,  page  26,  and  in  the 
"Extinct  Mammalian  Fauna  of  Dakota,"  &c.,  I  described  a  number  of  re- 
mains obtained  by  Professor  Hayden  on  Pawnee  Loup  Fork  of  the  Platte 


243 


River,  and  on  the  Niobrara  River,  Nebraska,  which  I  referred  to  a  species 
with  the  name  of  E.  excehus.  A  characteristic  specimen  referred  to  the  latter 
consists  of  a  portion  of  the  upper  jaw  containing  the  back  four  molars,  repre- 
sented in  Fig:  31,  Plate  XXI,  of  the  work  last  named.  The  teeth  in  this 
specimen  are  so  nearly  identical  in  character  with  those  from  California, 
referred  to  E.  occidentalism  as  may  .be  seen  by  comparing  the  figure  with 
Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  XXXIII,  of  the  present  work,  that  there  can  be  little  doul)t 
of  the  two  named  species  being  the  same. 

Since  the  original  description  of  the  two  specimens  referred  to  E.  occiden- 
talism I  have  seen  others  of  half  a  dozen  ditferent  individuals  from  California. 
All  these  present  sufficient  correspondence  in  peculiarity  of  character  as  to 
render  them  fairly  representative  of  an  extinct  species,  for  which  the  name 
of  E.  occidentalis  is  appropriate.  Fig.  1,  Plate  XXXIII,  represents  a  series 
of  the  anterior  four  upper  molars  contained  in  a  jaw-fragment.  Tlie  speci- 
men, together  with  another  similar  one  fiom  a  second  individual,  and  contain- 
ing all  the  molars  except  the  last  one,  were  obtained  by  Dr.  George  H.  Horn 
from  an  asphaltum  deposit  near  Buena  Vista  Lake,  California,  and  presented 
to  the  Academy.  Similar  specimens  have  also  been  submitted  to  my  exam- 
ination, obtained  at  the  same  locality  by  Professor  Whitney. 

The  upper  molar  teeth  of  E.  occidentalis  are  about  the  size  of  those  of  the 
larger  varieties  of  the  domestic  horse.  From  them  they  arc  in  general 
readily  recognizable  l)y  the  greater  simplicity  in  the  course  of  tlie  enamel 
lines,  as  displayed  on  the  worn  triturating  surface,  and  in  the  absence  of  the 
small  enamel-fold,  directed  inwardly,  at  the  bottom  of  the  oblique  valley 
between  the  inner  principal  folds  of  the  crown,  in  wliich  point  these  teeth 
accord  w'ith  those  of  the  existing  ass. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimens  referred  to  E.  occidentalis  and  repre- 
sented in  the  figures  are  as  follows  : 


Specimen  of  Fig.  1. 


Diameter  of  first  molar  . . 
Diameter  of  second  molar 
Diameter  of  third  molar . , 
Diameter  of  fourth  molar. 


Autero- 
liosterior. 

Transverse. 

iiwes. 

Lines. 

18 

13 

14^ 

14J 

144 

14.i 

12i 

134 

244 

Speciincii  ot  Fig.  "2,  representing  a  second  ur  third  molar  : 

Lines. 

LcTigtb  externally 127 

Autero-posterior  diameter  of  triturating  surface  15j 

Transverse  diameter 13i 

A  tooth  in  the  collection  of"  the  Smithsonian  Institntion,  apparently  refer-- 
al)le  to  the  same  species,  was  discovered  by  Mr.  Clarence  King  on  Sinker 
Creek,  Idaho. 

Equus  major. 

Figs.  3  to  1 7,  Plate  XXXIII,  represent  specimens,  from  different  localities 
of  the  United  States,  which  are  viewed  as  pertaining  to  an  extinct  horse, 
originally  referred  by  the  author  to  a  species  under  the  name  of  Equus  com- 
plicatus,  and  which  is  suspected  to  be  the  same  as  that  which  was  first  desig- 
nated by  Dr.  Dekay  under  the  name  of  Equus  major. 

Figs.  3,  4,  7  to  10,  12,  13,  represent  specimens  of  teeth  submitted  to  my 
examination  by  Messrs.  D.  C  Elliot  and  George  N.  Lawrence,  of  New  York. 
They  were  obtained  from  an  asphaltum-deposit  and  from  a  stratum  of  clay 
beneath,  in  Hardin  County,  Texas,  and  were  found  in  association  with  remains 
of  mastodon  and  other  extinct  animals. 

Figs.  3,  4  represent  a  first  upper  molar  of  the  right  side.  It  differs  in  no 
important  degree  from  the  corresponding  tooth  of  the  domestic  horse,  l)ut  is 
somewhat  larger  than  usual,  and  is  less  simple  in  the  course  of  the  enamel 
lines  on  its  triturating  surface. 

Figs  5,  6  represent  a  similar  tooth,  from  Illinois  Bluffs,  Missouri,  six  miles 
west  of  Saint  Louis.  According  to  the  late  Dr.  B.  F.  Shumard,  it  was  derived 
from  the  quaternary  formation  of  Missouri. 

Figs.  7,  8  represent  a  last  superior  molar  of  the  right  side,  accompanying 
the  first  molar,  from  Hardin  County,  Texas.  It  is  remarkable  for  its  great 
extent  of  curvature  compared  with  the  corresponding  tooth  in  the  recent 
horse.  The  arrangement  of  the  enamel  is  similar  to  that  in  the  latter,  and  is 
but  little  more  complex  than  usual. 

Fig.  9  represents  a  last  lower  molar,  and  Fig.  10  a  fifth  lower  molar.  These 
present  nothing  peculiar  distinguishing  them  from  the  corresponding  teeth  of 
the  recent  horse. 

Fig.  11  represents  a  second  or  third  upper  molar  of  the  right  side.  The 
specimen  was  found  liy  Dr.  Thomas  H.  Streets,  in  a  gully  of  Galveston  Bay, 


Texas,  and  prosoiited  hy  him  to  llic  Academy  of  Philadelphia.  In  the  eom- 
plexity  of  lijlding  oi"  the  enamel,  as  seen  on  the  triturating  surl'aee,  this  looih 
is  quite  characteristic  of  Eguus  comjdicatus. 

Fig.  12  represents  a  first  lower  temporary  molar,  one  of  tlie  specimens  from 
the  asphaltum-bed  of  Hardin  County,  Texas. 

Fig.  13  represents  an. upper  last  temporary  molar,  another  of  the  specimens 
from  the  locality  just  indicated. 

Fig.  14  represents  an  upper  molar  of  Equus  complicatus  from  the  "  phos- 
phate-beds" of  Ashley  River,  South  Carolina. 

Fig.  15  represents  an  inferior  molar  from  the  same  locality.  The  upper 
molar,  in  the  complex  condition  of  its  enamel-folding,  i§  characteristic  of  the 
species.  The  lower  molar  presents  nothing  distinctive  from  those  of  the 
recent  horse. 

Teeth  of  horses  are  frequently  found  in  the  Ashley  phosphate-beds,  mingled 
with  abundance  of  fossil  shai'k-teetli,  remains  of  mastodon,  elephant,  &c. 
Many  of  them  are  undistinguishable  from  those  of  the  recent  horse,  but  others 
in  size  and  complexity  of  the  enamel-folding  in  the  superior  molars  are  suffi- 
ciently characteristic  of  Equus  compUcatus. 

Figs.'  16  and  17  re|)resent  an  upper  and  a  lower  molar,  which  were  found 
associated  with  remains  of  mastodon  at  Pittstown,  on  the  banks  of  the  Sus- 
quehanna River,  Luzerne  County,  Pennsylvania.  .  The  teeth  are  more  than 
half  worn  away.  Their  size,  and  a  rather  greater  degree  of  complexity  than 
usual  in  the  enamel  lines  of  the  triturating  surfece  of  the  upper  molar,  would 
probably  indicate  that  they  belong  to  Equus  conqdicatus. 

Measurements  of  the  specimens,  represented  in-Figs.  3  to  17,  and  referred 
to  E.  compllcatits,  are  as  follows : 

First  upper  molar,  Figs.  3,  -1.— Leugtli  of  crown  externally,  35  lines ;  antero-posterior 
diameter.  21  Hues;  transverse  diameter,  15  lines. 

First  upper  molar,  Figs.  5,  C— Length  of  crown,  33  lines;  antero-posterior  diameter, 
21  Hues;  transverse  diameter,  15J  lines.   . 

Lust  upper  molar,  Figs.  1,  8.— Leugtli  at  antero-extermil  border  from  end  of  fang,  3G 
lines;  length  posteriorly ,,19  lines;  breadth  of  triturating  surface,  10  lines;  width,  21 
lines. 

Last  lower  molar.  Fig.  0.— Breadth,  10.^  lines;  width,  7  lines. 

Fourth  or  fifth  lower  molar,  Fig.  10.— Length  of  crown,  34  lines;  breadXh,  13i  lines; 
width,  73  lines. 

U2)per  second  or  third  molar,  Fig.  11.— Length  of  crown,  32  lines;  breadth,  11  lines; 
width,  15  lines. 

First  lower  temporary  molar,  Fig.  12.— Breadth,  174  lines;  width,  8  lines. 


24G 

Last  vpper  iemporunj  molar,  Fig.  lo. — Bicadtli,  17  linos;  width,  ]0  lines. 

Ujyper  second  or  third  molar,  Fig.  1-1. — Length  of  erown,  U.j  lines;  breadth,  14  liues; 
width,  13  lines. 

An  intermediate  lower  molar,  Fiij.  15. — Length  of  crown,  134  liues  ;  breadth,  13^  lines; 
width,  9J  liues. 

TIpi)cr  molar,  Fig.  IG. — Length  of  crown,  22  lines;  breadth,  13i  lines;  width,  14J  liues. 

Loiver  molar,  Fig.  17. — Length  of  crown  22J  lines ;  breadth,  14|  liues ;  width,  11 J 
liues. 

Among  a  small  collection  of  fossils  from  Texas,  snbmitted  to  my  examina- 
tion by  Professor  S.  B.  Buckley,  there  is  a  specimen  of  an  npper  molar  tooth 
of  a  horse  of  peculiar  character,  represented  in  Fig.  18,  Plate  XXXIII. 
The  exact  locality  from  whence  the  specimen  was  obtained  is  unknown. 
The  tooth  is  apparently  a  fourth  or  fifth  of  the  series,  and  is  only  sufticiently 
worn  to  exhibit  the  course  of  the  enamel  layers  on  the  triturating  surface. 
The  tooth  is  longer  than  in  the  domestic  horse,  and  is  rather  narrower  than 
usual  in  relation  with  its  fore  and  aft  diameter.  The  folding  of  the  enamel 
defining  the  median  lakes  of  the  triturating  surface  is  as  complex  as  in  Equus 
complicatus,  but  in  a  ditferent  position.  In  the  latter  the  folding  is  greatest 
on  the  contiguous  sides  of  the  lakes,  as  seen  in  Figs.  11  and  14,  but  in  the 
tooth  under  consideration  the  contiguous  sides  of  the  lakes  are  less  .folded 
than  usual  even  in  the  domestic  horse,  while  the  enamel  border  at  the  inner 
sides  of  the  lakes  is  folded  in  an  unusual  degree.  Further,  the  broad  inner 
peninsular  fold  of  the  triturating  surface,  which  in  the  domestic  horse  and 
other  known  species  has  a  simple  oval,  elliptical,  or  reniform  outline,  in  this 
specimen  is  of  extreme  width,  narrow,  and  folded  at  the  extremities.  The 
width  of  this  inner  fold  or  column  is  uniform  throughout  the  length  of  the 
crown. 

The  length  of  the  crown  of  this  tooth,  without  the  fangs,  in  the  entire  con- 
dition has  been  upward  of  4  inches.  Its  fore  and  aft  diameter  at  the  trit- 
urating surface  is  16  lines;  its  transverse  diameter  at  the  middle  of  the  same 
is  1  inch. 

Fig.  19,  Plate  XXXIII,  represents  a  fragment  of  an  ii|)per  molar  sub- 
mitted to  my  examination  by  Professor  J.  S.  Newberry.  It  was  obtained 
from  the  lignite-beds  of  Shoalwater  Bay,  Washington  Territory.  It  presents 
nothing  which  distinguishes  it  from  the  corresponding  part  of  the  molars 
of  the  domestic  horse. 

The  length  of  the  crown  externally  is  2f  inches,  and  the  fore  and  aft 
diameter  of  the  trituratin";  surface  is  14  lines. 


247 

HIPPARION. 

A  small  collection  of  fossils,  submitted  to  my  examination  l)y  Professor  S. 
B  Buckley,  mainly  consist  of  equine  remains,  of  wliich  the  determination  is 
uncertain  and  the  near  relations  obscure.  Most  of  them  were  obtained  in 
Washington  County,  Texas,  a  few  in  the  contiguous  county  of  Bastrop,  and 
several  others  in  Navarro  County.  They  were  usually  Ibund  in  digging  wells, 
at  the  depth  of  from  25  to  30  feet,  imbedded  in  a  rocky  stratum.  Most  of 
the  specimens  are  free  troui  matrix,  but  several  have  attached  portions  of  a 
hard  arenaceous  limestone.  From  the  character  of  the  fossils,  I  suppose  the 
formation  to  be  of  contemporaneous  age  with  that  which  has  been  called  Plio- 
cene Tertiary  of  the  Niobrara  River,  Nebraska,  Little  White  River,  Dakota, 
and  that  noticed  in  the  preceding  pages  of  the  Sweetwater  River,  Wyoming. 

Fig.  14,  Plate  XX,  represents  a  specimen  labeled  as  having  been  obtained 
from  an  ossiferous  rock  at  a  depth  of  25  feet,  in  Washington  County,  Texas. 
It  is  a  last  upper  molar  of  a  small  equine  animal,  and  is  moderately  worn' 
away  at  the  triturating  surface.  It  is  strongly  curved,  and  is  nearly  twice  the 
length  antero-externally  that  it  is  postero-internally.  In  the  isolation  of  the 
antero-internai  column  from  the  antero-median  column,  as  seen  on  the  triturat- 
ing surface,  it  accords  with  the  character  of  Hipparion.  It  sufficiently  re- 
sembles in  its  relative  proportions,  and  the  complexity  of  arrangement  of  its 
enamel-folds,  the  fragment  of  a  tooth,  represented  in  Fig.  17,  Plate  XVIII, 
of  the  Extinct  Mammalian  Fauna  of  Dakota,  &c.,  to  belong  to  the  same  species. 
The  latter  specimen  was  also  obtained  in  AVashington  County,  Texas,  and  has 
been  referred  to  Hipparion  speciosum,  a  species  originally  proposed  from 
specimens  discovered  at  Bijou  Hill,  Dakota,  and  represented  in  Figs.  1(1,  LS 
and  19  of  the  work  just  indicated. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows: 

Lines. 

Length  of  crown  anfero-externally H^ 

Length  of  crowu  postero-internally    ^h. 

Breadth  of  crown  antei'o-posteriorly ^k 

Breadth  of  crown  transversely - ^4 

Another  specimen,  consisting  of  the  middle  portion  of  an  upper  molar,  from 
its  proportions  and  the  folding  of  the  enamel  lakes  of  the  triturating  surfece, 
is  supposed  to  belong  to  the  same  species.  It  was  obtained  in  Navarro 
County,  Texas. 


•248 

Fig.  15  represents  a  specimen  found  in  associaliuii  witii  that  oC  Uic  jire- 
vitins  figure  of"  the  same  plate.  It  appears  to  be  a  tiiird  or  fourth  up|)er 
molar,  ami,  IVom  the  size  and  arrangement  of  enamel  on  the  triturating  sur- 
liice,  might  be  supposed  to  belong  to  the  same  animal  as  the  former  speci- 
mens. In  the  proportions  of  the  tooth  it  resembles  those  of  Merychippus 
more  than  it  does  those  of  Hipparion.  The  crown  is  quite  short,  and  exhibits 
a  considerable  degree  of  curvature.  It  is  al^out  2  lines  long  on  the  inner  side, 
iind  three  times  that  length  on  the  outer  side.  On  the  triturating  surface  the 
antero-internal  column  appears  as  an  elliptical  ring,  as  in  Hipparion,  Ijut  it 
exhibits  a  pointed  process  indicative  of  continuity  at  a  later  period  with  the 
antero-median  column,  as  in  Protohippus  and  Merychippus.  The  tortuous 
enamel-line  on  the  inner  part  of  the  triturating  surface  presents  no  median 
fold  directed  toward  the  elliptical  ring,  as  is  the  case  also  in  the  fourtii  molar 
of  Protohij^ius,  as  seen  in  Fig.  2,  Plate  XVII,  of  the  Extinct  Mammaruiu 
Fauna  of  Dakota,  &c. 

The  antero-pqsterior  diameter  of  the  tooth  is  Tjj  Hues,  and  its  transverse 
diameter  8.^  lines. 

Another  specimen,  consisting  of  a  mutilated,  unworn  molar,  from  its  pio- 
p(jrtions,  is  supposed  to  Ijelong  to  the  same  species  as  the  former.  It  was 
obtained  at  a  depth  of  30  feet  from  the  surface  in  Washington  County,  Texas. 
The  crown  internally  is  5.J  lines  long,  and  has  measured  externally  about  10 
lines.  Its  breadth  is  9  lines,  and  its  transverse  diameter  has  been  but  little 
less. 

PR(JTOIIIPPUS  (?)  s.  MERYCHIPPUS? 

Among  the  Texan  collection  of  fossils  there  are  several  which  are  suspected 
to  belong  to  one  or  other  of  the  equine  genera  above  named. 

Fig.  IG,  Plate  XX,  represents  a  specimen  obtained  from  a  well,  at  a  dciith 
of  32  feet,  at  Independence,  Washington  County,  Texas.  It  is  an  upper 
molar,  apparently  the  second  or  third  of  the  series  of  the  usual  complement 
of  six  large  teeth  in  equine  animals.  In  its  proportions  it  would  appear  to 
belong  to  the  genus  Merychippus  rather  than  Protohippus.  The  crown  is 
from  3J  to  4  lines  in  length  on  the  inner  side,  and  from  7  to  8  lines  on  the 
outer  side.  The  median  enamel  lakes  of  the  triturating  surface  are  of  simple 
character,  and  widely  gaping,  apparently  indicating  but  comparatively  little 
wear,  notwitiistanding  the  shortness  of  the  crown.  In  the  appearance  of  the 
triturating  surface  it  resembles  more  the  teeth  of  Piotoliippus  'peiditus,  as 


249 


represented  in  Fig.  2,  Plate  XVII,  of  llie  Extinct  Mammalian  Fauna  of 
Dakota,  &c.,  than  it  does  those  of  Merychippus,  represented  in  Figs.  5  and  9  of 
the  same  plate.  On  the  other  hand,  it  bears  a  near  resemblance  to  the  teeth 
from  Little  White  River,  Dakota,  represented  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  XXVII,  of  the 
work  just  quoted,  which  were  supposed  to  pertain  to  Merychippus  mirahUis. 

Another  specimen,  from  Bastrop  County,  Texas,  consists  of  an  upper  molar 
with  the  portion  internal  to  the  median  enamel  lakes  broken  away.  It  is 
rather  smaller  than  the  preceding,  and  would  ai)pear  to  hold  the  relation  with 
it  in  the  series  of  a  fourth  or  fifth  molar. 

A  third  specimen,  accompanied  l)y  a  label  in  the  handwriting  of  Dr.  Shu- 
mard,  is  marked  ("Eocene,)  Trinity  River,  Navarro  County,  Texas."  It  is  a 
lower  molar,  represented  in  Fig.  20,  Plate  XX,  and  may  perhaps  lielong  to 
the  same  species  as  the  preceding. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimens  are  as  follows: 

Lines. 

Bi-eadth  of  the  second  upper  molar 9| 

Width  of  the  secoud  upper  mokxr IQi 

Breadth  of  the  fourth  upper  molar    ' S 

Breadth  of  the  lower  molar 9 

Width  of  the  lower  molar 53 

Fig.  17  represents  a  specimen  found  in  association  with  those  of  Figs.  14, 
15,  at  a  depth  of  25  feet,  in  Washington  County,  Texas.  It  is  an  upper 
molar  of  the  right  side,  probably  the  fourth  of  the  series.  It  is  but  moder- 
ately worn,  and  is  imperfect  at  the  back  inner  corner.  In  its  proportions  and 
degree  of  curvature  it  agrees  with  the  teeth  of  Protohippus.  In  size  and 
arrangement  of  the  enamel  it  approaches  in  character  some  of  those  referred 
to  Protohijypus  placidus,  represented  in  Figs.  39  to  48,  Plate  XVIII,  of  the 
Extinct  Mammalian  Fauna  of  Dakota,  &c. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Length  on  inner  side 8 

Length  at  antero-external  corner lli 

Breadth  of  triturating  surface 7i 

Transverse  diameter  of  surface 7 

Fig.  18  of  the  same  plate  represents  a  specimen  from  '"Little's  Well,'"  30 
feet  in  depth  from  the  surface,  in  Bastrop  County,  Texas.     It  is  a  iirst  upper 
molar,  and  is  sufKciently  like  the  former  to  belong  to  the  .same  species.     It 
32  G 


250 


also  resembles  the  corresponding  toolli  of  Fii^f.  6,  Plate  XXVII,  of  the  Ex- 
tinct Mammalian  Fauna  of  Dakota,  &c.,  sufficiently  to  pertain  to  the  same 
species.  This  specimen  was  obtained  on  Little  White  River,  Dakota,  and 
was  referred  to  Protohiiipus  placidus.  The  proportions  of  the  former  are  the 
same,  but,  being  more  worn,  it  is  shorter,  and  appears  larger  at  the  triturating 
surface.  At  the  same  stage  of  abrasion  they  would  even  bear  a  greater 
resemblance  to  each  other,  as  the  open  fold  on  the  posterior  part  of  the  Little 
White  River  specimen,  in  a  more  worn  condition,  would  then  form  an  islet  on 
the  triturating  surface,  as  in  the  Texas  specimen. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen,  in  comparison  witii  those  of  the  Little 
White  River  specimen,  are  as  follows: 


Texas 
specimen. 


Dakota 
specimen. 


Length  of  crown  at  tbe  antero-internal  column.. 
Length  of  crown  at  the  postero-external  cohiinn  . 

Breadth  of  crown  at  the  triturating  surface 

Width  of  crown  at  the  triturating  surface 


Lines. 

6 
10 

H 

7 


Lines. 
S 

9 

S 


The  Museum  of  the  Smithsonian  Institution  contains  several  specimens  of 
teeth  apparently  of  ProtoMppus  perdilus  and  Meryckippus  mirabUis,  obtained 
by  Mr.  Clarence  King  in  Utah. 

AXCHITHERIUM. 

AnCHITHERIUM    (?)    AUSTRALE. 

Among  the  Texan  collection  of  fossils  there  is  a  specimen  of  peculiar 
character  rejn-esented  in  Fig.  19,  Plate  XX.  It  was  tbund  in  association  with 
that  of  Fig.  16,  of  the  same  plate,  in  Washington  County,  Texas.  It  is  the 
first  of  the  series  of  six  large  upper  molars  as  existing  in  equine  animals,  but 
exhibits  in  front  the  impress  of  a  premolar  larger  than  usual  in  members  of 
the  order.  The  specimen  is  broken  at  its  outer  part,  but  the  remainder 
is  nearly  as  characteristic  as  if  the  whole  were  complete.  The  crown  is  so 
worn  away  that  the  dentine  is  continuous  upon  all  the  constituent  lobes.  An 
olilique  valley  extends  from  the  inner  side  and  ends  in  a  foot-like  expansion 
near  the  center  of  the  triturating  surface,  and  l)ack  of  the  center  there  re- 
mains a  crescentic  enamel  lake. 


2.51 

The  tootli  i.s  devoid  of"  eoinentuni,  and  resembles  in  its  constitution  the  cor- 
responding one  of  Anchitherium  nearer  than  it  does  that  of  other  known 
equine  animals.  The  inner  and  intermediate  lol)es  appear  somewhat  fuller 
than  in  Anchitherium,  and  the  intermediate  spaces  narrower  and  less  con- 
vergent at  bottom. 

It  maj'  perhaps  belong  to  Anchippus,  founded  on  an  imperfect  tooth  from 
the  same  locality,  and  represented  in  Fig.  13,  Plate  XXI,  of  the  Extinct 
Mammalian  Fauna  of  Dakota,  &c.  It  presents  important  peculiarities,  l)ut 
these  may  depend  on  the  difierence  of  position  of  the  tooth  in  the  series. 
There  is,  however,  one  feature  in  the  tooth  of  Anchippus  which  is  absent  in 
the  specimen  under  consideration,  rendering  it  probable  that  the  teeth  per- 
tain to  different  genera:  The  feature  to  which  I  allude  consists  of  a  con- 
spicuous fold  or  offset  from  the  postero-median  lobe  projecting  into  the  oljlique 
valley  of  the  crown  toward  the  antero-median  fold.  In  Parahippus  the  same 
fold  exists  in  a  more  complex  condition. 

The  tooth  in  question  likewise  resembles  that  represented  in  Fig.  11,  Plate 
XXI,  of  the  work  above  quoted,  as  characteristic  of  the  genus  Hypohippus, 
nearly  as  much  as  it  does  those  of  Anchitherium,  and  may,  perhaps,  belong 
to  a  smaller  species  of  the  former. 

In  the  uncertainty  as  to  the  nearer  generic  relationship  of  the  specimen  it 
may  be  regarded  as  indicative  of  a  species  of  Anchitherium  with  the  name 
given  at  the  head  of  the  chapter.  Tiie  species  was  about  as  large  as  the 
Anchitherium  aurelianense  of  the  Eocene  Tertiary  deposits  of  France. 

The  estimated  size  of  the  tooth  is  11  lines  in  diameter  antero-posteriorly 
and  nearly  the  same  measurement  transversely. 

Anchitherium  agreste. 

During  Professor  Hayden's  exploration  in  Montana,  he  discovered  several 
fossil  jaw-fragments  of  a  species  of  Anchitherium.  They  were  found  in  asso- 
ciation with  a  Helix,  partially  imbedded  in  an  indurated,  gray,  arenaceous 
marl,  and  were  derived  from  a  lacustrine  Tertiary  deposit  on  Red  Rock 
Creek,  one  of  the  head  Ijranches  of  the  Jefferson  Fork  of  the  Missouri 
River. 

The  jaw-specimens  belonged  to  a  species  considerably  larger  than  the 
Anchitherium  Bairdi  of  the  Miocene  Tertiary  of  White  River,  Dakota,  and 
approached  in  size  (lu,^  A.  aurelianense  of  the  Pliocene  Tertiary  of  France. 


252 

The  teetli  in  the  specimens,  as  represented  in  Figs.  IG,  17,  Plate  VII,  are 
considerably  worn,  but  retain  their  anatomical  characters  snfHciently  to  show 
that  they  are  identical  in  form  with  those  of  the  two  species  just  named. 
They  nearly  accord  in  size  \\'ith  the  mutilated  upper  molar,  represented  in 
Fig  5,  Plate  II,  from  Oregon,' referred  to  Anchitherium  Condom.  In  the  doubt 
whether  the  latter  is  really  a  true  species  of  the  genus  in  which  it  has  been 
placed,  the  lower-jaw  fragments  in  cpiestion  are  regarded  as  representino-  a 
species  with  the  name  heading  the  chajiter. 

Measurements  from  the  specimens  are  as  follows: 

Lilies. 

Space  occupied  bj'  tbe  back  four  molars 34 

Space  occupied  by  the  back  three  molars 27 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  last  premolar ....    , S 

Transverse  diameter  of  last  premolar G4 

Fore  aud  aft  diameter  of  first  molar 73 

Transverse  diameter  of  first  molar 7 

Fore  and  aft  diameter  of  last  molar 11 

Ti'ausverse  diameter  of  last  molar 5a 

Anchitherium  (?) . 

In  digging  a  well  at  Antelope,  Nebraska,  in  the  summer  of  1868,  at  the 
depth  of  60  feet  a  stratum  was  found  which  was  stated  to  be  remarkable 
for  the  number  of  fossil-bones  it  contained.  The  relative  age  of  the  stratum 
has  not  yet  been  ascertained,  but  from  the  character  of  the  fossils  it  is  sus- 
pected to  be  contemporary  with  the  Mauvaises  Terres  formation  of  White 
River,  Dakota,  or  perhaps  with  the  later  formation  of  the  Niobrara  River, 
Nebraska.  From  among  the  specimens  collected  at  the  time,  my  friend  Dr. 
John  L.  Le  Conte  obtained  a  coronary  bone  of  a  small  equine  animal,  which  he 
sent  to  me-  for  examination . 

The  specimen  was  exhibited  to  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences,  and  is 
noticed  in  its  Proceedings  for  August,  1868.  Subsequently,  some  remains, 
apparently  of  tlie  same  animal,  from  the  same  locality  were  described  by 
Professor  Marsh  in  the  American  Journal  of  Sciences  for  October,  1868,  and 
referred  by  him  to  a  diminutive  horse  with  the  name  of  Equus  parmilus. 

The  specimen  of  the  coronary  bone  is  represented  in  Fig.  23,  Plate  XX. 
It  is  only  a  little  over  half  the  length  and  is  considerably  less  than  half  the 
breadth  of  the  corresponding  bone  of  the  horse,  so  that  it  indicates  an  animal 
of  little  more  than  half  its  height  and  of  more  slender  proportions.  Its 
size  would  about  accord  with  Anchitherhan  Bairdi  of  the  White  River 
Tertiary  formation  of  Dakota. 


253 
The  nieasurciiiLUits  of  the  specimen  nre  as  follows: 

Lill(^S. 

Lcngtli  ill  the  axis 9 

Breadth  at  tTie  upper  extremity !) 

Thiclvuess  at  the  upper  extremity (> 

Breadth  at  the  lower  extremity 8 

Order  Ruminantia. 

BISON. 

Bison  latifeons. 

Remains  of  large  oxen  which  were  contemporaneous  witli  the  American 
mastodon  have  been  discovered  in  several  parts  of  North  America.  They 
have  been  referred  to  several  extinct  species,  but  the  materials  have  been  too 
incomplete  to  determine  the  question  with  any  degree  of  satisfaction  whether 
they  pertain  to  more  than  one.  The  fossils  indicate  individuals  very  greatly 
diflfering  in  size,  but  the  difference  is  perhaps  sexual  rather  than  sjjecific: 
The  more  robust  specimens  probably  belonged  to  males,  and  the  smaller 
ones  to  females. 

The  most  complete  specimen  which  the  author  has  had  the  opportunity  of 
examining  is  the  cranium,  retaining  the  horn-cores,  represented  in  Figs.  4,  5, 
Plate  XXVIII,  one-fifth  the  natural  size.  It  was  discovered  by  Mr.  Calvin 
Brown  and  his  son  Wilfred,  of  San  Francisco,  California,  while  engaged  as 
engineers  in  the  construction  of  the  Spring  Valley  water-works  of  that  city, 
and  by  these  gentlemen  was  presented  to  the  Academy  ot  Natural  Sciences  of 
Philadelphia.  Mr.  Calvin  Brown  informs  me  that  tiie  cranium  was  found 
in  a  bed  of  blue  clay,  21  feet  below  the  surface,  in  Pilarcitos  Valley. 

The  specimen  resembles  the  corresponding  part  of  the  skull  of  the  living 
buffalo  {Bison  mnericanus)  so  closely  that  it  will  be  unnecessary  to  describe'  it 
in  detail.  Besides  being  larger,  the  horn-cores  are  especially  dispropor- 
tionately larger,  and  are  more  transverse  in  their  direction,  or  are  less  inclined 
backward.  The  occiput  appears  proportionately  wider  and  lower  from  the 
less  degree  of  prominence  of  its  summit.  The  latter  is,  however,  ^\•ider, 
and  is  more  distinctly  defined  from  the  posterior  occipital  surface  by  the 
rougher  and  more  prominent  protuberance  of  attachment  for  tlie  nuchal 
ligament.  The  occipital  foramen  is  no  larger  than  in  the  l)uffalo.,  and  the 
notch  below,  between  the  condyles,  is  more  contracted.  The  Ibrelicad,  near 
its  middle,  is  rather  more  protuberant  than  in  the  bnlfalo. 


254 


Comparative  measurements  of  the  fossil  with  the  correspoudiug  part  of 
the  skull  of  a  large  buffalo  are  as  follows : 


Bison 
latifrons. 


Distance  between  tips  of  horn-cores 

Distance  between  bases  of  born-cores 

Circumference  at  bases  of  born-cores 

Lengtb  of  born-core  along  lower  curvature   

Breadth  of  forehead  where  narrowest 

Breadth  of  forehead  at  back  of  orbits 

Length  of  forehead  from  occiput  to  fronto-nasal  suture 

Breadth  of  occiput 

Depth  of  occiput 

Breadth  of  condyles  together 

Transverse  diameter  of  occipital  foramen 

Vertical  diameter  of  occipital  foramen 

Distance  between  ends  of  paramastoid  processes 

Length  of  temporal  fossa -  - 


Indies. 
.36 
15J 
14 
Uh 
13^ 
16 
13J 
12A 

7 

6 

2 

53 


Bison 
americanus. 


Inches. 
26 
12 
11 
12 
11 

10 
10 

5 
2 

43 

4f 


The  California  collection  of  fossils,  belonging  to  the  cabinet  of  Wabash 
College,  Indiana,  contains  several  specimens  of  teeth  which  I  suppose  to 
belong  to  Bison  latifrons.  They  were  loaned  to  me  for  examination  through 
the  kindness  of  Professor  E.  O.  Hovey,  and  are  represented  in  Figs.  6,  7,  Plate 
XXVIII.  They  consist  of  the  second  and  third  upper  molars,  and  agree  in 
constitution  with  the  corresponding  teeth  of  the  recent  buffiilo,  and  in  size 
correlate  with  the  skull  above  described  and  referred  to  B.  latifrons. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimens,  in  comparison  with  those  of  the 
buffalo,  are  as  follows  : 


Bison 
latifrons. 

Bison 

americanus. 

Secontl  upper  molar  : 

A iitorn-i^nsit'pririr  diMTTiPtpr  of  t,rif,nrnt'iill<T'  SUvfMfiP,            

Lines. 

11 

14 

18 
13i 

Lines. 
15 

Transverse  diameter  of  triturating  surface  - 

T'i'missv'prQfi  flininptpr  of  orown  iionr  l"»nsp                        ■         -  ^ 

lOa 
123 

Third  upper  molar : 
Aiifpro-no<*tprior  (liniiifteT  of  tritnratitisr  surface   

15 

Transverse  diameter  of  tritui^ating  surftice 

Transverse  diameter  of  crown  near  base 

255 

An  isolated  iippcr  secuiul  molar  of  Biison  laufrons^  found  in  association 
with  remains  of  Mastodon  ainericanus  and  Equus  major  at  Pittstown,  on  the 
Susquehanna  River,  Luzerne  County,  Pennsylvania,  is  represented  in  Fig.  S, 
Plate  XXVIII.  It  is  considerably  worn,  the  usual  median  internal  fold  of 
the  tooth,  in  a  less  worn  condition,  being  seen  in  the  specimen  as  an 
oval  islet. 

The  fore  and  aft  diameter  of  the  specimen  is  16.j  lines,  and  its  transverse 
diameter  at  the  triturating  surface  I'/  lines. 

A  specimen  of  a  last  inferior  molar  of  a  Bison,  represented  in  Fig.  4, 
Plate  XXXVII,  and  a  metacarpal  bone  of  the  Megulonyx  Jeffersoni, 
presented  to  the  Academy  l)y  Dr.  Edward  D.  Kittoe,  of  Galena,  were 
obtained,  together  with  some  additional  bones,  from  a  crevice  of  the 
lead-bearing  rocks,  at  a  depth  of  130  feet  from  the  surface,  near 
Elizabeth,  Jo  Daviess  County,  Illinois.  The  tooth  is  about  the  size  of 
that  of  the  recent  bulfalo,  and  may  pertain  to  that  species,  though  it  is  not 
improbable  it  may  have  belonged  to  a  small  individual  of  Bison  latifroiis. 

The  specimen  is  but  little  worn.  The  length  of  the  crown  at  its  fore  part 
is  '2|  inches ;  its  breadth  23  lines ;  its  thickness  at  the  base  anteriorly  10 
lines  ;  and  near  the  triturating  surface  7  lines. 

AUCHENIA. 

AUCIIENIA    HESTERNA. 

In  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  for  1870,  page 
125,  the  writer  described  some  fossil  remains  from  California,  submitted  to 
his  inspection  by  Professor  J.  D.  AVhitney.  Among  the  fossils  were  several 
which  were  attributed  to  a  large  extinct  llama,  with  the  name  of  Auchenia 
californka.  The  specimens  upon  which  the  species  was  founded  consisted 
of  a  metacarpal  l)one,  the  fragment.of  another,  the  proximal  end  of  a  femur, 
an  acetabulum,  and  portions  of  a  tiliia.  The  species  indicated  was  much 
larger  than  the  camel,  as  the  head  of  tlie  femur  is  3  inrlios  in  diameter,  and 
the  metacarpal  is  19  inches  long,  whereas  the  latter  in  the  camel  is  but  13 
inches  long. 

In  the  Philosophical  Transactions  of  London  for  1870,  Professor  Owen 
has  described  some  remains  of  a  large  extinct  llama  from  Mexico,  under  the 
name  of  Palauchcnia  magna.  This  animal  approximated  in  size  the  camel, 
whereas  the  remains  attributed  to  Auchenia  californica  much  exceeded  it. 

Of  the  remains  referred  by   Professor  Owen  to  Palauchenia,  there  is  a 


256 

series  of"  molar  teeth  described  and  figured  from  casts  and  photographs.  The 
teeth  are  considered  as  pertaining  to  the  lower  jaw,  but  from  a  view  of  the 
figures  I  cannot  avoid  the  suspicion  that  they  really  belong  to  the  upper  jaw. 
In  the  form  and  proportions  of  the  molars,  but  especially  in  the  form,  consti- 
tution, and  number  of  the  premolars,  the  series  appears  to  me  to  resemble 
more  the  upper  one  of  the  camel  and  llama  than  it  does  the  lower  one.  In 
one  respect  one  of  the  molars,  the  last  of  the  series,  approaches  in  character 
the  last  lower  molar  of  the  camel  and  llama.  •  This  is  in  the  possession  of  a 
fifth  lobe,  which  is,  however,  much  less  well  developed  than  in  the  latter 
animals.  If  the  view  I  have  taken  is  not  erroneous,  Palauchenia,  so  far  as 
we  know  it  from  its  remains,  would  not  present  sufficient  distinctive  char- 
acter to  be  regarded  as  of  a  different  genus  from  Auchenia. 

Among  the  collection  of  fossils  from  California,  belonging  to  the  cabinet 
of  Wabash  College,  Indiana,  tliere  is  a  well-preserved  series  of  lower  molar 
teeth,  represented  in  Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  XXXVII.  These,  from  their  size  and 
constitution,  would  appear  to  belong  to  a  species  of  llama  exceeding  in  size 
not  only  the  existing  llama,  but  also  the  camel  and  the  Palauchenia. 

The  question  at  once  arises  whether  these  teeth  belong  to  Auchenia  cali- 
fornica,  Palauchenia  magna,  or  to  a  third  species. 

The  proportions  of  the  bones  upon  which  the  former  was  founded  indicate 
an  animal  one-third  larger  than  the  camel,  but  the  teeth  above  noticed  might; 
belong  to  an  animal  but  little  exceeding  a  large  camel  or  the  P.  magna.  If 
the  characters  assigned  to  the  latter  as  a  genus  are  correct,  it  is  clear  that 
the  series- of  teeth  from  California  do  not  belong  to  the  same  animal,  and  tliey 
then  could  only  pertain  to  a  small  individual  of  Auchenia  callfornica,  or  to 
another  species  rather  larger  than  the  existing  camel.  Under  the  circum- 
stances, until  further  light  is  thrown  on  the  subject  by  the  discovery  of  addi- 
tional material,  we  may  suppose  that  two  large  species  of  llama,  perhaps" 
exclusive  of  Palauchenia  magna,  were  once  inhabitants  of  the  western  por- 
tion of  the  North  American  continent,  contemporaneously  with  the  Mastodon 
americanus.  One  of  these  species,  a  third  larger  than  tlie  existing  camel,  is 
the  Auchenia  californica ;  the  second,  intermediate  in  size  to  the  two  latter, 
may  be  named  A.  hesterna.     . 

The  teeth  in  question  indicate  an  animal  which  had  arrived  at  .maturity. 
While  the  first  molar,  which  earliest  acquired  its  functional  position,  is  much 
worn,  the  last  molar  has  its  fifth  lobe  unabraded,  and  the  pi-emolar  has  but 
partially  lost  its  summit. 


257 


The  molars  sliow  no  cliaracteristic  differences  t'roni  tliose  of  the  llama  and 
eamel.  The  narro\\'  told  seen  projecting  outwardly  in  advance  of  the  antero- 
external  lobe  of  the  last  molar,  and  in  a  less  degree  in  the  second  molar,  in 
the  llama,  is  nearly  obsolete  in  the  fossil. 

The  premolar  presents  some  difference  from  the  corresponding  tooth  *in 
the  llama.  The  crown  is  thickest,  and  is  romided  behind,  and  it  narrows 
lbr\\ard  to  the  anterior  subacute  border,  which  is  convex  longitudinally,  and 
is  thickened  toward  the  bottom.  The  outer  side  is  not  impressed  at  the  back 
part,  as  in  the  llama,  and  is  feebly  impressed  at  the  fore  and  upper  part.  The 
inner  side  also  is  but  moderately  impressed  along  the  middle,  compared  with 
its  condition  in  the  llama.  A  deep  enameled  pit  occupies  the  inner  back  part 
of  the  crown,  penetrating  from  the  triturating  surface,  as  in  the  latter.  The 
pit  opens  backward  for  a  considerable  portion  of  its  depth,  and  is  closed  in 
this  position  by  apposition  with  the  succeeding  tooth. 

The  measurements  of  the  teeth,  in  comparison  with  those  of  the  camel 
and  llama,  are  as  follows  : 


Fourtfi  premolar: 

*  Breadth  of  crovcu  where  greatest 

*  Width  of  crown  where  greatest. . 
Length  of  crown  to  origin  of  fangs. 


■  First  molar : 
Breadth  of  triturating  surface. 
Width  of  triturating  surface  . . 
Length  of  crown 


Second  molar: 
Breadth  of  triturating  surface. . 
Width  of  triturating  surface  . . . 
Width  of  crown  where  greatest. 
Length  of  crown 


Third  molar : 
Breadth  of  crown  where  greatest. 
Width  of  crown  where  greatest . . . 
Length  of  crown 


Aucheuia 
hesterna. 


Lilies. 

13 

G 

20 


20 

lOi 

20" 


20 
10 


ai 

10 

41 


Aucbonia 
lauia. 


Camel. 


Lines. 


•J.-i 


Lilies. 


12 


3 

7 

G 

14 

7 

18 

5  . 

9 

5 

5 

9 

23 

5| 

10 

5^ 

10 

G 

IG 

3 

28 

h.L 

10 

7 

17 

*  For  brevity  I  bave  iised  breadtb  for  tbo  antero-posterior  diameter,  and  width  for  tlio  trausverso 

diameter. 


33  cf 


258 


The  length  of  the  sei'ies  of  lower  inoLais  and  premolars  together,  in  the 
clitFerent  species,  is  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

LcTigtU  of  tbe  series  iu  the  llama 32 

Length  of  the  series  in  the  camel C(i 

Length  of  the  series  iu  the  Auchenia  hesterna  84 

Accompanying  the  inferior  molar  specimens  from  California  there  is  a 
specimen  of  an  upper  molar  represented  in  Fig.  3,  Plate  XXXVII,  which, 
from  its  constitution  and  size,  is  supposed  to  belong  to  the  same  species,  if 
not  the  same  individual. 

It  is  a  first  or  second  true  molar  of  the  left  side,  and  closely  resembles  tlie 
corresponding  teeth  of  the  llama. 

Its  comparative  measurements  are  as  follows : 


Second  upper  molar. 

Llama. 

Camel. 

Auchenia 
besterua. 

Palauchenia 
magna.* 

Breadth  of  the  triturating  surface 

Lines. 

8 

8 

Lines. 
20 
11 
13 
10 

Lines. 
23J 
12 

29 

Lilies. 
21 

Width  of  the  triturating  surface 

Width  of  crown  near  base 

11^ 

Length  of  crowu  

lOJ 

"Professor  Owen's  measurements  giveu  as  those  of  the  secoml  lower  molar. 


PROCAMELUS. 

The  genus  Procamelus,  or  Protocamelus,  was  originally  named  from  remains 
discovered  by  Professor  Hayden,  in  the  Tertiary  sands  of  the  Niobrara  Eiver, 
Nebraska.  Three  species  were  indicated  from  tlie  locality  under  the  names 
of  Procamelus  rohustus,  P.  occidentalism  and  P.  gracilis.  The  specimens  show 
that  Procamelus  possessed  a  series  of  four  premolars  and  three  molars  to  the 
lower  jaw,  from  which  we  may  infer  an  equal  number  to  the  ujiper  jaw.  The 
molars  and  last  premolar  have  the  same  form  as  those  of  the  camel. 

Among  the  Texan  collection  of  fossils,  loaned  by  Professor  Buckley,  there 
is  a  specimen  of  a  tooth  supposed  to  belong  to  Procamelus.  It  is  repre- 
sented in  Fig.  21,  Plate  XX,  and  was  found  in  association  with  the  equine 
teeth  before  described,  and  represented  in  Figs.  14,  15,  and  17  of  the  same 
plate.  It  is  a  first  or  second  upper  molar,  and  sufficiently  resembles  the 
corresjiftnding  tooth  of  P.  occidentalism  as  we  may  suppose  it  would  appear  in 


259 

the  same  stage  of  wear,  as  to  render  it  probable  tliat  it  may  Ijelong  to. the 
same  species. 

The  tooth  is  much  worn,  leaving  two  narrow  crcscentic  enamel  pits  in  the 
middle  of  the  triturating  suriace.  No  trace  of  an  internal  column  or  tubercle 
e.xists  in  the  interval  internally  of  the  inner  lobes  of  the  crown. 

The  specimen  measures  11  lines  antero-posteriorly,  and  nearly  the  same 
extent  transversely. 

Fig.  22  represents  an  astragalus  found  in  association  with  the  molar  tooth 
just  described,  and  probably  belonging  to  the  same  animal.  It  has  nearly 
tlie  size  and  form  of  those  of  the  common  deer,  but  is  proportionately  a  little 
longer  and  narrower. 

Another  specimen  in  the  same  collection  consists  of  a  cubo-navicular  bone 
of  a  ruminant  a  fourth  smaller  than  the  common  deer.  It  was  found  in  asso- 
ciation with  the  equine  tooth  above  described,  and  represented  in  Fig.  16, 
Plate  XX. 

An  additional  specimen  consists  of  a  last  lumbar  vertelri'a,  a])parently  of  a 
ruminant.  It  was  obtained  in  Washington  County,  at  a  de[)th  of  30  feet, 
from  a  hard  arenaceous  limestone.  It  is  white  in  color,  crushed  downward, 
and  has  a  portion  of  the  matrix  adherent.  The  vertebra  has  nearly  the  size 
and  form  of  the  corresponding  bone  of  the  camel,  and  tnay  have  pertained  to 
the  largest  species  of  Procamelus,  named  P.  rohustus. 

Procamelus  virginiensis. 

I  may  here  indicate  the  recent  discovery  of  some  remains,  apparently  of  a 
species  of  Procamelus,  in  the  Miocenj3  Tertiary  formation  of  Virginia,  the 
first  which  have  yet  been  noticed  of  the  family  in  any  locality  east  of  the 
Mississippi  River. 

Mr.  C.  M.  Smith,  of  Richmond,  Virginia,  while  engaged  in  excavating  a 
tunnel  beneath  the  city,  discovered  a  number  of  bones  and  teeth,  which  he 
has  loaned  to  me  for  investigation.  They  were  found  imbedded  in  blue  clay 
containing  numerous  infusorial  remains,  among  which  the  beautiful  frustules 
of  a  Coscinodiscus  are  especially  conspicuous.  The  fossil-bones  mainly 
consist  of  those  of  cetaceans  and  fishes,  but  among  them  are  a  few  of 
land-animals,  and  also  a  portion  of  a  humerus  of  a  Inrd.  The  forma- 
tion from  which  the  fossils  were  derived  is  proliably  an  estuary  deposit  of 
Miocene  age.     Among  the  fossils    there  are  several  tcetli,  which  arc  sup- 


260 

l)ose<l  to  belong  to  a  species  of  Procainelus.  The  spcciiiieiis,  consisting  of  a 
last  premolar,  aud  the  first  and  last  molars  of  the  lower  jaw,  are  represented 
in  Figs.  26  to  29,  Plate  XXVII.  The  teeth  have  the  same  form  and  consti- 
tution as  those  of  the  western  species  of  Procamelus  above  named,  and  they 
appear  to  indicate  an  additional  species,  which  was  about  the  size  of  the  ex- 
isting llania,  and  intermediate  in  size  to  P.  occldcntaHs  and  P.  graciUs 
The  measurements  of  the  teeth  are  as  follows : 

LiiR's. 

Autero-posterior  diameter  of  last  premolar 7 

Transverse  diameter  of  last  jiremolar 4 

Anteroposterior  diameter  of  first  molar 7;^- 

Transverse  diameter  of  first  molar (] 

Anteroposterior  diameter  of  last  molar ll'i 

Transverse  diameter  of  last  molar 0 

MEGxVLOMERYX. 
Megalomeryx  niobrarensis  (?) 

The  genus  to  which  the  above  name  was  applied  has  not  been  determined 
by  ])()sitive  characters,  and  may  prove  not  to  be  distinct  from  Procamelus. 
It  was  i)roposed  on  two  specimens  of  teeth  of  a  large  ruminant,  apparently 
of  the  camel  family,  discovered  by  Professor  Hayden  in  the  Pliocene  Tertiary 
sands  of  the  Niobrara  River,  Nebraska.  The  teeth,  both  lower  molars,  are 
described  in  the  "  E.\tinct  Mammalia  of  Dakota  and  Nebraska,''  page  161,  and 
are  represented  in  Figs.  12-14,  Plate  XIV,  of  tliat  work. 

•A  similar  tooth  was  submitted  to  my  examination,  by  Professor  J.  D.  Whit- 
ney, fi-om  the  Pliocene  Tertiary  of  Tuolumne  County,  California. 

Figs.  24,  25,  Plate  XXVII,  represent  a  mutilated  lower  molar,  apparently 
(d'the  same  species.  This  was  found  in  L'Eau  qui  Court  County,  in  Northern 
Nebraska,  and  was  presented  to  Swarthmore  College  by  George  S.  Truman. 

0  H  E  L  0  N  I A . 

EMYS. 

Emys  petrolei. 

An  extinct  species  thus  named  is  indicated  l)y  a  number  of  fragments  of 
several  turtle-shells,  which  were  found  in  association  with  remains  of  Masto- 
don, Megalonyx,  Equus,  Tnicifrlis  fafalis,  &c.,  in  Hardin  County,  Texas. 
They  were  ol^tained  I'roin  a   stratum  of  clay  beneath  a  bed   of  bitumen,  and. 


261 

lik(!  must  of  IIr'  otliLT  i'ostiiLs  aecoinpauyiiig  them,  are  tliuroiighl}-  saliiratcd 
with  bitumen. 

Tiie  most  characteristic  specimens  consist  of  two  isolated  cpisterna,  repre- 
sented in  Fig.  7,  Plate  IX.  They  indicate  an  animal  al)()ut  tin?  size  of  the 
recent  Emys  scabra  of  the  Southern  States,  but  the  hones  are  proportionately 
more  robust  tlian  in  that  species.  They  abruptly  project  in  advance  of  the 
lateral  grooves  defining  the  gular  scutes,  antl  are  squarely  Iruneate'd.  Tiie 
upper  gular  surface  is  nearly  square,  and  slopes  forward  to  an  acute  edij:e. 
In  one  specimen  it  is  wider  fore  and  aft  than  transversely;  in  the  other  rather 
less.     Behind  the  gular  surface,  the  bone  is  deeply  hollowed  into  a  concavity. 

The  measurenients  of  the  specimens  are  as  follows  : 


Wkltli  of  episternal  at  the  front  bonlor ...    I  10 

Length  of  internal  border 11 

Leugtli  of  po.stero-lateral  border 12 

Greatest  thickness  of  tlie  bone j  5J 

A  hyposternal  bone  about  the  middle  is  28  lines  fore  and  aft,  26  lines  wide 
behind  the  inguinal  notch,  and  half  an  inch  where  thickest  internally. 

The  fore  part  of  a  nuchal  plate  of  the  carapace  resembles  the  corres|)on(l- 
ing  portion  in  Emys  scabra,  but  is  more  deeply  indented.  Its  width  in  IVont 
is  an  inch;  the  length  of  its  median  ridge  is  10^  lines;  and  its  thickness  where 
greatest  is  half  an  inch. 

FISHES. 

The  following  species  of  extinct  fishes  were  first  described  by  the  writer 
in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelpliia  iiir 
June,  1870.  Tiie  specimens  were  borrowed  for  my  examination  from  a 
gentleman  ot  New  York,  by  my  friend  Mr.  George  N.  Lawrence,  of  the 
same  city.  The  locality  of  the  specimens  was  not  ascertained  other  than 
that  they  came  from  the  Rocky  Mountains.  They  were  accompanied  with 
some  shells,  evidently  of  the  later  Tertiary  period,  and  also  with  a  coronary 
bone,  apparently  of  Equus  exceisiis.  The  fish-rcmains  consisted  of  eight 
detached  i)haryngeal  bones  of  a  cyprinoid.  and  a  single  dermal  bone  of  a  ray. 

Subsequently,  while  a  notice  of  these  fossils  was  in  press,  the  writer 
received  from  Professor  Hayden  a  pharyngeal  bone  of  the  same  species  and 
ap[>earauce  as  the  Ibrmer,  which  was  labeled  "Castle  Creek,  Idaho." 


2(32 

More  recently,  Prulbssor  J.  S.  Newberry  sent  to  me  a  small  collection  of 
fossils,  among  which  were  seven  additional  specimens  of  pharyngeal  Itones, 
identical  in  appearance  with  the  former,  which  were  stated  to  have  been 
fonnd  at  Castle  Creek,  Idaho. 

Later,  Professor  Cope  described,  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  American 
Philosophical  Society,  a  number  of  species  and  genera  of  extinct  cyprinoid 
fishes  from  Catharine's  Creek,  Idaho.  Among  these  he  indicates  the  same 
species  as  that  to  which  the  above-mentioned  pharyngeals  have  been 
attril)nted,  and  which  have  been  referred  to  a  previously  undescribed  genus, 
as  follows : 

Family   Cyprinidce. 
MYLOCYPRINUS. 

MvLOCYPfilNUS  EOBUSrUS. 

The  specimens,  consisting  of  detached  pharyngeal  bones  with  teeth,  from 
which  the  genus  and  species  were  oi'iginally  described,  were  all  imperfect. 
Having  attempted  the  description  without  a  previous  comparison  with  the 
corresponding  bones  of  a  recent  cyprinoid,  I  find  I  have  been  so  careless  as 
to  have  described  them  in  an  inverted  position.  The  specimens  later  received 
are  better  preserved,  and  among  them  are  five  complete  ones.  All  the 
specimens  together  exhibit  such  a  variety  in  size  and  detail  as  to  lead  one  to 
suspect  they  may-  represent  sevei'al  different  species,  though  I  view  them  as 
belonging  to  a  single  one,  the  diiferences  being,  as  I  suppose,  mainly  due  to 
a  difference  of  age.  Six  specimens,  from  Professor  Newberry's  collection, 
are  represented,  of  the  natural  size,  in  Figs.  11  to  17,  Plate  XVII,  all  of  them, 
excepting  Fig.  16,  being  views  beneath  with  the  back  part  directed  upward. 
Fig.  IG  represents  an  inner  view,  exhibiting  the  masticatory  surfaces  of  the 
teeth. 

The  principal  i-ow  of  teeth  consisted  of  five,  as  may  be  seen  by  the  organs 
themselves  and  their  remains  in  Figs.  11  to  14,  inclusive.  They  are  all  of 
the  true  masticatory  type,  and  are  directed  inwardly,  opposed  to  those  of  th(; 
other  side.  Tiic  first  and  last  of  the  series  are  the  smallest,  and  the  inter- 
mediate ones  are  comparatively  large. 

In  the  smallest  specimens,  and  the  youngest,  as  I  suppose  them  to  be,  the 
second  tooth  is  the  largest,  and  from  this  they  .successively  decrease  in  size 


263 

to  the  last,  as  seen  in  Fig.  13.  In  tlie  largest  and  oldest  specimens,  tiie  in- 
termediate three  teeth  are  nearly  equal  in  size,  as  seen  in  Figs.  16,  17.  In 
the  specimens  of  intermediate  size  and  age  we  notice  some  irregularity,  hut 
generally  a  disposition  to  increasing  uniformity  of  size  in  the  corresponding 
teeth. 

The  first  tooth  is  directed  backward  toward  those  behind;  the  otliers  are 
parallel  in  their  direction  inwardly. 

The  crown  of  the  terminal  teeth  is  more  mammillary  than  in  the  interme- 
diate ones,  in  which  it  is  oval  with  the  longer  diameter  directed  from  above 
downward,  and  the  short  diameter  fore  and  aft.  The  masticating  surface  of  the 
teeth  is  broad,  oval,  moderately  convex,  sometimes  nearly  flat,  and  usually 
slightly  depressed  at  the  middle  or  at  the  center.  The  crowns  resemble 
strikingly  those  of  worn  human  premolars,  and  are  covered  by  tliick,  smooth 
^nameloid  substance. 

The  teeth  are  supported  on  strong  bony  columns  as  long  as  the  crowns 
They  project  from  the  lower  ramus  of  the  pharyngeal  below  tlie  position  of 
the  upper  or  postei'ior  ramus.  The  last  of  the  series  projects  backward  and 
inward  from  the  conjunction  of  the  two  branches,  as  usual  in  cyprinoids. 

In  the  older  specimens,  it  would  appear  that  the  first  tooth  of  the  series 
was  after  a  certain  time  not  replaced. 

Most  of  the  specimens  present  evidences  of  the  existence  of  two  minute 
teeth  forming  a  secontl  row  above  the  principal  one. 

The  pharyngeal  bones,  in  accordance  with  the  strong  crushing  teeth  they 
sustain,  are  stronger  than  usual  in  the  ordinary  living  carp-like  fishes. 

The  pharyngeal  bone  is  widest  opposite  the  larger  teeth.  The  oblique 
surface  directed  forward  and  outward  exhibits  the  usual  deep  hollows  extend- 
ing to  the  bases  of  the  teeth,  or  through  the  bone  in  some  cases  when  the 
latter  are  absent  or  shed.  The  posterior  and  inferior  surfaces  are  flat,  and 
transversely  striated,  or,  in  the  older  ones,  more  or  less  strongly  ridged.  The 
anterior  border  is  vertically  concave.  The  external  border,  acute  below  and 
obtuse  behind,  is  unusually  thick.  The  inner  border,  extending  backward 
beyond  the  conjunction  of  the  two  branches  of  the  bone,  is  that  wliich  sus- 
tains the  teeth. 

The  upper  or  posterior  ranuis  is-  comparatively  short,  bent  forward  and 
inward,  and  ends  in  a  p(jint  by  which  it  was  suspended  from  tlie  occiput. 
The  extremity  of  (he  louiT  or  anterior  ramus,  extending  in  advance  of  the 


264 


teeth,  ends  in  a  triangular  process  vvitli  a  lozeuge-like  articular  surface  Ibr 
symphysial  attachment  with  the  bone  of  the  opposite  side. 
Measurements  derived  from  seven  specimens  are  as  follows: 


.  Measurements. 

Spec.  1. 

Spec.  2. 

Spec.  3. 

Spec.  4. 

Spec.  5. 

Spec.  6. 

Spec.  7. 

Leiigtli  of  .series  of  five  teeth , . . . 

Lines. 

Lines. 

Lines. 

Littcs. 

Lines. 

73 

G 

54 

11 
2i 

2 

^ 
2 

Lines. 

7 

G 

1 

2i 
2 
2 
1* 

Lines. 

Leugtli  of  series  of  four  teetbj  exclud- 

15* 

12 

12 
10 

8 

9 

7 

5 

Length  of  series  of  intermediate  three 
teeth 

4 

Leugth  of  series  of  anterior  three  teeth. 

Lone"  diameter  of  crown  of  first  tooth . . 

Long  diameterof  crown  of  second  tooth. 
Short  diameter  of  crown  of  second  tooth. 
Long  diameter  of  crown  of  third  tooth . 
Short  diameter  of  crown  of  third  tooth . 
Long  diameter  of  crown  of  fourth  tooth. 

4| 

3| 

5 
3J 

H 

H 

3 
3 

20* 

12.J 

2J 

H 

22 
4 

2i 

3 

2.r 

H 

2i 

3" 
0 

2i 

IS 
li 
•14 

1 

Short  diameterof  crown  of  fourth  tooth. 

Long  diameter  of  crown  of  tifth  tooth . 

1 

Short  diameter  of  crown  of  fifth  tooth . 

a 

Length  of  lower  branch  from  back  of 
iiharvniieal.           

24* 

17* 
14 

17 

lU 
10 

IG 

11 
9 

14 
10 

11 

8 

lOJ 

Depth  of  upijer  branch  to  bottom  of 
pliaryngeal 

Widtli  of  pharj'ngeal  iuferiorly 

7 

Estim.ated. 


Family  Raice. 

ONCOBATIS. 

Oncobatis  pentagonus. 

An  extinct  ray,  before  alluded  to,  is  indicated  by  a  single  dermal  Ijone,  of 
which  two  views  are  given,  of  the  natural  size,  in  Figs.  18,  19,  Plate  XVII. 
The  bone  has  a  pentagonal  outline  with  curved  margins,  with  the  under  or 
inner  surface  strongly  convex  and  smooth.  The  upper  or  free  surface  presents 
five  sloping  planes  more  or  less  well  defined  by  prominent  borders.  Less 
lliaii  half  the  extent  of  the  external  surface  at  the  center  is  occupied  by  an 
areola  of  thin  enameloid  substance  which  is  smooth  and  shining  nnd  marked 
with  concentric  lines.  The  summit  of  the  lione,  in  the  center  of  the  areola, 
l)rojects  as  a  point  of  harder  and  more  translucent  osseous  substance. 


The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows: 

Lines. 

Greater  diameter  of  the  dermal  bone , IG 

Shorter  diameter  of  the  dermal  bone 15 

Thickness  from  summit 8 

The  many  more  fossil-remains  of  fishes  from  the  Tertiary  formation  of 
Idaho,  described  by  Professor  Cope,  he  attributes  to  two  additional  species 
of  Mylocyprinus,  seven  species  of  four  other  genera  of  Cyprinidse,  and  a 
species  of  Salmonidse.  Fossil-shells  described  by  Mr.  Meek  from  the  same 
formation,  as  well  as  the  cyprinoid  fishes,  indicate  a  fresh-water  deposit.  The 
presence  of  a  ray  may  probably  indicate  an  easy  communication  with  salt 
water. 

34  G 


DESCRIPTION  OF  REMAINS  OF  REPTILES  AND  FISHES  FROM 
THE  CRETACEOUS  FORMATIONS  OF  THE  INTERIOR  OF  THE 
UNITED  STATES. 


The  Cretaceous  formation  in  the  interior  of  the  United  States  covers  an 
area  reaching  southerly  into  Texas,  and  extending  over  a  large  portion  of  tiie 
eastern  slope  of  the  Rocky  Mountains,  northerly  along  the  region  of  the 
Upper  Missouri  River  to  its  sources.  Exposed  to  viisw  over  a  great  extent 
of  this  area,  a  still  larger  portion  underlies  the  vast  Tertiary  deposits  of  the 
country,  Its  thickness  ranges  from  800  to  2,500  feet,  and  it  consists  of 
various  colored  strata  of  indurated  clays  and  sandstones,  and  indurated  marls 
and  limestones.  So  far  as  known,  most  of  them  are  of  marine  origin,  and 
contain  an  abundance  of  characteristic  fossils.  Some  of  the  strata  con- 
tain remains  of  terrestrial  plants,  proving  that  the  country  in  the  vicinity  of 
the  great  Cretaceous  seas  was  clothed  with  forests  resembling,  in  the  generic 
characters  of  the  trees,  the  forests  of  our  own  time.  Species  of  sweet-gum, 
poplar,  willow,  biroh,  beech,  oak,  sassafras,  tulip-tree,  magnolia,  maple,  and 
others  have  been  described  from  the  fossils.  With  such  a  vegetation  we 
would  expect  the  contemporaneous  existence  of  some  forms  of  mammalian 
life,  but  as  yet,  in  these  as  well  as  in  other  Cretaceous  deposits  of  the  world, 
no  remains  of  mammals  have  beeu  discovered.  We  are,  however,  still  on 
the  lookout  for  some  lacustrine  or  river  deposit  of  the  Cretaceous  era  which 
perhaps  will  reveal  early  forms  of  mammals — forms  which  may  more  nearly 
relate  the  mammal  with  the  reptile  than  any  now  known  to  us. 

Remains  of  birds  have  been  found  in  the  Cretaceous  formation  of  Kansas, 
and  have  been  described  by  Professor  Marsh.  Two  genera  indicated  by  him 
under  the  names  of  Ichthyornis  and  Apatornis  are  the  most  I'emarkable  of 
their  kind,  and  may  be  viewed  as  tbe  most  interesting  and  important  paleoii- 
tological  discovery  yet  made  in  the  West.  They  have  biconcave  vertebivne, 
and  the  j^ws  are  furnished  with  teeth.  Like  the  Archeeopteryx  of  the  Solen- 
hofen  limestone,  they  make  the  relationship  of  birds  to  reptiles  much  nearer 
than  appears  among  existing  forms. 


267 

111  remains  of  reptiles  and  fishes  the  western  Cretaceous  formation  abounds. 
Many  of  these  have  been  described  by  Professor  Cope  and  Professor  Marsh. 
Araoiiir  the  reptiles  are  some  of  the  largest  and  most  wonderful  of  their  kind, 
represented  by  great  turtles  allied  to  Atlantoclielys  ;  numerous  species  of 
Mosasaurus  and  closely  related  genera ;  the  Polycotylus  and  the  long-necked 
Discosaurus  allied  to  Plesiosaurus ;  and  Pterodactyls,  with  an  enormous 
expanse  of  wings. 

The  following  pages  contain  descriptions  of  remains  of  reptiles  and  fislies 
which  have  come  under  tlie  observation  of  the  author  mainly  from  the  west- 
ern Cretaceous  deposits.  A  few  of  the  remains  are  doubtful  as  to  the  forma- 
tion from  which  they  have  been  derived,  but  are  believed  to  be  Cretaceous 
fossils.  As  intimately  related  with  the  western  Cretaceous  fossils,  descrip- 
tions of  a  few  others  are  included  from  eastern  localities. 

Most  of  the  fossils  were  submitted  to  the  examination  of  tlie  author  by  the 
Smithsonian  Institution,  and  form  part  of  a  collection  from  the  Smoky  Hill 
River,  Kansas,  and  from  the  Indian  Territory,  presented  to  the  Army  Medical 
Museum  of  Washington  by  Di-.  George  M.  Sternberg,  United  States  Army. 
Others  from  the  Smithsonian  Institution  were  collected  in  the  vicinity  of 
Fort  McRae,  New  Mexico,  and  were  presented  to  the  Army  Medical  Museum 
by  Dr.  W.  B.  Lyon,  United  States  Army.  Many  of  the  fossils  were  collected 
during  the  explorations  of  Professor  Hayden.  The  remainder  form  part  of 
the  Museum  of  the  Acadeiny  of  Natural  Sciences  and  Swarthmore  College, 
or  have  been  contributed  by  Dr.  William  Spillman,  Dr.  John  L.  Leconte, 
Professor  George  H.  Cooke,  William  M.  Gabb,  George  II.  Truman,  and 
others. 

REPTILES. 

Order  Dinosauria. 
POICILOPLEURON. 

POICILOPLEUKON    VALENS. 

During  Professor  Hayden's  expedition  of  1869,  a  fossil  was  given  to  him 
as  a  "  petrified  horse-hoof"  The  specimen  was  found  in  Middle  Park,  Col- 
orado, and  according  to  Professor  Hayden  was  probably  derived  from  a  forma- 
tion of  Cretaceous  age.  Similar  specimens  were  reported  not  to  be  uncommon, 
and  were  known  as  above  designated.  Indeed  the  writer  has  seen  a  second 
specimen,  which  was  also  called  a  fossil  horse-hoof,  but  unfortunately  liis 
notes  in  relation  to  it  have  been  mii-laid. 


2G8 

The  fossil  in  question  consists  of  one-half  of  a  vertebral  body  as  repre- 
sented in  Figs.  IG  to  18,  Plate  XV.     When  resting  upon  the  articular  face, 
it  is  not  surprising  that  it  should  have  been  taken  tor  a  ''  petrified  horse- 
"hoof"  by  those  not  conversant  with  anatomy. 

The  vertebral  body  in  its  entire  condition  would  resemble  in  form  those  of 
Megalosaurus,  and  in  shape  and  other  characters  resembles  those  of  Poicilo- 
pleuron  Bucklandi.  This  is  an  extinct  reptile,  from  the  Oolitic  formation  of 
Caen,  Normandy,  described  by  M.  Deslonchamps ;  and  remains  apparently 
of  the  same  animal,  from  the  Wealden  formation  of  Tilgate,  England,  have 
been  noticed  by  Professor  Owen.  It  has  been  viewed  as  a  crocodilian,  and 
is  estimated  to  have  been  about  25  feet  in  length. 

The  Colorado  fossil  would  indicate  an  animal  approximating  40  feet  in 
length. 

One  of  the  most  remarkable  characters  of  Poicilopleuron  is  the  presence 
of  a  large  medullaiy  cavity  within  the  bodies  of  the  vertebrae,  as  well  as  in 
the  long  bones  of  the  limbs.  Among  living  animals  I  know  of  a  similar  con- 
dition in  the  vertebrae  of  none  except  in  the  caudals  of  the  ox.  This  curious 
"feature  is  a  striking  one  in  the  Colorado  fossil,  as  represented  in  Fig.  18. 
The  lower  two-thirds  of  the  body  appear  occupied  hy  a  large  cavity,  crossed 
by  a  few  osseous  trabeculse.  The  cavity  is  bomided  by  a  thick  lateral  and 
inferior  wall  of  compact  substance,  resembling  that  of  the  shaft  of  the  long 
bones  of  most  mammals.  The  wall  is  about  2  lines  thick,  and  thins  away 
at  the  upper  part  of  the  body  where  this  is  occupied  by  the  ordinary  spongy 
substance.  The  latter  extends  into  the  abutments  of  the  neural  arch,  and  is 
here  more  dense  in  character.  The  cavernons  structure  of  the  fossil  is  filled 
with  crystalline  calcite. 

The  estimated  length  of  the  vertebral  body  is  about  G  inches.  At  the  sides 
and  beneath  it  is  much  constricted  or  narrowed  toward  the  middle.  The 
transverse  section  approaching  the  latter  position  is  vertically  ovoid,  with  the 
lower  and  narrower  end  forming  an  acute  angle. 

The  articular  end  of  the  specimen,  Fig.  16,  is  moderately  depressed  its 
greater  extent,  most  so  above  and  becoming  more  superficial  below.  Its 
upper  border  overhangs  the  deepest  portion  of  the  surface ;  the  lateral  bor- 
ders are  obtusely  rounded,  and  widen  below  in  a  strongly  convex  ledge,  prob- 
ably for  the  accommodation  of  a  chevron  bone.  The  bi'eadth  of  the  articular 
surface  is  nearly  4  inches ;  Its  vertical  extent  a  little  over  that  measurement. 


270 


The  abuliuents  of  the  iieurul  arch  are  tirraly  co-ositied  wilh  the  body,  but 
tlieir  SLitiiral  connection  is  plainly  visible.  Just  l)elow  the  suture,  the  side  of 
the  body  presents  a  concavity.  The  beginning  of  a  groove  or  narrow  con- 
cavity is  also  seen  extending  forward  beneath  the  body.  The  lateral  surfaces 
of  tlie  specimen  are  smooth,  excepting  near  the  everted  articular  border  of 
(he  body,  where  they  are  roughened  for  the  firmer  attachment  ot  ligaments. 

Poicilopleuron  was  probably  a  semi-aquatic  Dinosaurian,  an  animal  equally 
capalile  of  living  on  land  or  in  water,  and  perhaps  spending  most  of  its  time 
on  shores  or  in  marshes.  Whether  the  cavernous  structure- of  its  skeleton 
was  related  to  pneumatic  functions,  as  in  birds,  flying  reptiles,  and  some 
others,  or  whether  it  was  only  occupied  with  ordinary  marrow,  is  a  question 
that  appears  uncei'tain  while  our  knowledge  of  the  skeleton  itself  is  so 
incomplete. 

Order   Clielonia. 

Among  Dr.  Sternberg's  collection  of  fossils  from  the  Smoky  Hill  River, 
Kansas,  there  are  several  which  appear  to  be  the  limb-bones  of  a  turtle. 
Similar  bones  from  the  Cretaceous  formal  ion  of  New  Jersey  and  Mississippi' 
I  formerly  attributed  to  species  of  Mosasaurus,  but  the  recent  discoveries  of 
characteristic  portions  of  the  skeleton  of  this  and  allied  animals,  retaining 
the  limbs,  have  proved  that  view  to  be  erroneous. 

A  huge  turtle,  represented"  by  the  proximal  extremity  of  a  humerus  ibund 
in  the  green  sand  of  New  Jersey,  was  named  by  Professor  Agassiz  Atlan- 
tochelys  Mortoni.  Professor  Cope  has  described  some  remains  of  a  species 
nearly  as  large  as  the  former,  from  Kansas,  under  the  name  of  Protosfega 
gig'is;  and  an  arm-bone  of  a  smaller  turtle,  from  the  Cretaceous  formation 
of  Mississippi,  he  has  referred  to  a  species  with  the  name  of  P.  tuberosa. 
Remains  of  a  turtle,  about  the  size  of  the  Mississippi  snapper,  from  Kansas, 
he  has  attributed  to  another  genus  with  the  name  of  Cynocerciis  incisus.  The 
specimens  of  limb-bones  above  mentioned,  and  represented  in  Figs.  17  to  21, 
Plate  XXXVI,  are  not  large  enough  to  pertain  to  the  smallest  of  the  three 
species  of  Atlantochelys  indicated,  but  would  sufficiently  relate  in  size  with 
the  remains  of  Cynocercus  incisus  to  belong  to  that  animal. 

The  bones  appear  unusually  flat,  but  this  condition,  in  part  at  least,  is  due 
to  compression. 

Fig.    17,   Plate   XXXVL    represents  the   upper  extremity   of  a   luuncrus 


270 

extencling  to  the  commencement  of  the  distal  expansion  of  the  shaft.  It 
resembles  nearly  the  corresponding  })ortion  of  the  humerus  of  the  snapper 
completely  flattened,  or  a  miniature  of  that  of  Atlantochelys  in  the  same  con- 
dition. The  greater  tuberosity  appears  to  spring  from  above  the  top  of  the 
head  externally,  so  that  its  upper  anterior  border  looks  like  an  extension  of 
the  articular  surfiice  of  the  latter.  A  strong  muscular  impression  is  situated 
upon  the  inner  fore  part  of  the  shaft.  The  lesser  tuberosity  projects  poste- 
riorly, and  ends  in  a  thick,  roughened,  convex  surface. 

The  breadth  of  the  specimen  between  the  two  tuberosities  obliquely  meas- 
ures 33  lines ;  the  breadth  of  the  shaft,  where  narrowest,  is  10  lines. 

Fig.  18,  represents  a  complete  femur,  apparently  from  the  same  individual 
as  the  former.  As  in  the  snapper  and  Trionyx,  it  is  of  proportionately  less 
breadth  than  the  humerus.  It  is  apparently  much  flattened  by  pressure,  so 
as  to  differ  considerably  from  its  exact  original  form.  The  trochanters  appear 
I'elatively  to  have  been  as  well  developed  as  in  the  snapper,  and  the  distal 
articulation  may  be  supposed  to  have  had  nearly  the  same  form. 

The  length  of  the  femur  is  64  inches.  The  breadth  of  the  upper  ex- 
tremity is  20  lines,  of  the  lower  extremity  16  lines,  and  of  the  middle  of 
the  shaft  7  lines. 

Several  additional  bones  accompanying  the  former  appear  to  belong  to  the 
shoulder  of  the  same  animal. 

Fig.  19,  represents  what  appears  to  be  a  portion  of  the  left  scapula  with  its 
upper  end  and  the  prge-coracoid  prolongation  broken  away.  The  specimen 
appears  distorted  and  flattened  from  its  normal  condition  as  the  result  of 
pressure. 

Fig.  20,  represents  what  appears  to  be  a  portion  of  the  coracoid  bone  of 
the  same  side,  also  somewhat  distorted  by  pressure. 

Fig.  21,  represents  another  bone-fragment,  apparently  from  the  same  indi- 
vidual, which  I  cannot  determine  to  my  own  satisfaction.  Like  the  other 
specimens,  it  appears  flattened  from  its  normal  condition. 

Order  Mosasauiia. 

Large,  extinct,  marine  saurians,  most  nearly  ccHistructed  as  in  Lacertilians, 
but  having  limbs  constructed  as  paddles  for  swimming.  The  relations  of  these 
reptiles  with  the  serpents,  as  suggested  by  Professor  Cope,  in  his  Synopsis  of 
the  Extinct  Batrachia,  Reptilia,  &c.,  have  been  much  reduced  by  the  subse- 


271 

quent  discoveries  of  Professor  Marsli ;  and  tlicy  appear  hardly  sufficient  to 
justify  the  name  of  Pytlionomorplia. 

Tlie  remains  of  mosasauroid  reptiles  are  comparatively  aljundant  in  the 
Cretaceous  formation  of  the  United  States.  The  specimens  collected  have 
formed  the  basis  of  a  multitude  of  species  and  genera,  the  number  of  which 
will  probably  be  somewhat  reduced  on  more  careful  study  and  comparison  of 
the  materials. 

In  the  description  of  the  few  mosasauroid  remains  which  have  been  sub- 
mitted to  my  examination,  I  have  referred  them  to  species  for  the  most  part 
as  recently  named  by  Professor  Marsh,  who,  with  the  rich  materials  in  his 
jjossession,  has  the  best  opportunity  of  determining  their  generic  and  specific 
characters. 

TYLOSAURUS. 
Tylosaurus  dyspelor. 

Among  the  fossils  submitted  to  my  examination  by  the  Smithsonian  Insti- 
tution, there  are  some  bones  of  a  large  mosasauroid  animal,  collected  by  Dr. 
W.  B.  Lyon,  United  States  Army,  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  McRae,  New  Mexico. 
They  consist  of  vertebra?,  mostly  more  or  less  crushed  and  otherwise  muti- 
lated, and  a  few  limb-bones,  and  were  ol)tained  from  a  stratum  of  soft,  yel- 
lowish chalk.  Specimens  from  the  same  collection  and  skeleton  were  de- 
scribed by  Professor  Cope,  and  referred  to  a  species  with  the  name  of  Liodon 
dyspelor.  This  was  subsequently  referred  to  a  genus,  by  Professor  Marsh, 
with  the  name  of  Rhinosaurus,  which,  being  pre-occupied.  Professor  Cope 
proposed  that  of  Rhamphosaurus,  and,  as  this  also  was  previously  approjiri- 
ated,  Professor  Marsh  has  now  proposed  the  name  of  Tylosaurus. 

Of  the  specimens  selected  by  me  for  examination  half  a  dozen  consist  of 
centra  and  parts  of  others  of  posterior  dorsal  vertebras,  most  of  which  are 
remarkable  for  tha  extent  of  compression  they  have  undergone  with  little 
appearance  of  fractures.  They  look  as  if  they  had  been  in  a  plastic  condi- 
tion, and  in  this  state  had  been  flattened  from  above  downward. 

In  three  of  the  specimens,  consisting  of  posterior  halves  of  dorsal  centra, 
the  articular  ball  presents  a  iialf  oval  outline  below,  with  slanting  sides  above, 
and  an  emarginate  summit.  The  measurements  of  the  ball,  indicating  a  suc- 
cessive increase  in  the  degree  of  flattening  in  the  three  specimens,  arc  as 
follows : 


272 

Liucs. 

Depth  of  specimen  represented  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  XXXV  , 44.  2 

Breadth  of  specimen - CO.  0 

Depth  of  second  specimen 42.  0 

Breadth  of  second  specimen 01.  (J 

Depth  of  specimen  represented  in  Fig.  2 39.  8 

Breadth  of  specimen 63. 0 

In  the  other  three  sijecimens,  consisting  of  nearly  complete  dorsal  centra, 
and  measuring  about  4J  inches  in  Jength,  the  compression  is  still  greater. 
In  one  of  the  specimens  the  distal  articulation,  represented  in  Fig.  3,  is  so 
flattened  as  to  appear  transversely  lenticular  in  outline  and  emarginate  above. 
It  measures  30  lines  in  depth  and  62J  lines  in  breadth. 

Seven  selected  specimens  consist  of  caudals  which  have  mostly  undergone 
little  or  no  compression.  They  all  pi'esent  beneath  a  pair  of  strong  processes 
projecting  obliquely  backward  from  nearer  the  posterior  part,  and  excavated 
ill  a  conical  pit  directed  backward  and  downward  for  articulation  with  chev- 
rons. Three  have  been  provided  with  strong  diapopliyses  projecting  in 
advance  of  the  middle  and  nearly  half  way  up  the  sides.  A  fourth  specimen 
has  a  small,  narrow  diapophysis  projecting  in  advance  of  the  middle  and 
about  two-thirds  up  the  sides.  The  remaining  two  vertebrae  have  no  dia- 
popliyses. 

The  caudals  with  diapopliyses  have  the  articular  ends  of  the  body  trans- 
versely oval,  witli  a  slightlj'  hexahedral  outline,  emarginate  above,  and  in  a 
less  degree  below.  Tliose  without  diapopliyses  have  the  articular  ends  of 
proportionately  less  width,  of  less  hexahedral  outline,  and  not  emarginate 
below,  so  that  they  appear  more  cordiform  than  oval. 

The  largest  caudal  with  diapophyses  has  measured  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Estimated  length  of  centrum  beneath 37.5 

Estimated  breadth  of  articular  ends 48.  0 

Depth  of  articular  ends 42.  0 

A  smaller  caudal  with  diapophyses,  less  mutilated,  and  represented  in  Figs. 
4,  5,  measures  as  follows : 

Linos. 

Length  of  centrum  beneath 28.  5 

Breadth  of  articular  ends 44. 0 

Depth  of  articular  ends , , 40.  0 

The  caudal  with  small  diapophyses,  represented  in  Figs.  6,  7,  measures  as 
follows : 


273 

Liues. 

Length  of  centrum  bcueatli .'><>.  0 

Breadth  of  articuhir  emls tO.  5 

Depth  of  articular  ends 30. 0 

The  better  preserved  of  the  caiidals  without  diapophyses,  represented  in 
Fig.  8,  measures  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Length  of  centrum  beneath 24 

Breadth  of  articular  eud.s 38 

Depth  of  articular  ends 3G 

The  researches  of  Professor  Marsh  have  proved  the  mosasauroid  reptiles 
to  have  had  four  limbs  constructed  as  paddles  and  adapted  to  swimming. 
Previous  to  his  discoveries  it  was  supposed  that  posterior  limbs  were  absent. 

Specimens  of  limb-bones,  found  in  association  with  the  vertebral  specimens 
above  described,  are  supposed  to  belong  to  the  posterior  limbs,  from  the  latter 
pertaining  to  the  back  part  of  the  column. 

The  femur  represented  in  Fig.  9,  Plate  XXXV,  is  a  broad  bone  strikingly 
diiFerent  from  the  humerus  of  Clidastes.     The  specimen  is  probably  more^ 
flat  than  in  the  normal  condition,  as  its  many  fractures  are  evidences  of  its 
having  been  crushed. 

The  distal  extremity  is  much  the  wider,  and  the  upper  extremity  is  but 
little  wider  than  the  shaft.  The  head  appears  as  a  wide,  lenticular,  convex, 
and  very  rugged  surface.  The  lower  extremity  ends  in  a  long,  narrow,  ellip- 
tical, rusared  surface  for  articulation  with  the  bones  of  the  fore-arm.  From 
the  posterior  part  of  the  shaft  there  projects  a  thick,  convex  ridge,  which 
terminates  above  in  an  oval,  flat,  rugged  surface,  sloping  from  that  of  the 
head  of  the  bone. 

The  rugged,  articular  surfaces  of  the  femur  would  appear  to  indicate  a 
cartilaginous  continuity  with  the  contiguous  bones  more  intimate  than  in 
Clidastes. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Liues. 

Length  of  femur ^" 

Breadth  of  head ^^i 

Breadth  of  distal  extremity ^^ 

Breadth  at  narrowest  part  of  shaft ^^ 

Thickness  of  head  and  trochanter 28 

Greatest  thickness  of  lower  extremity '■ ^'^ 

The  remaining  two  bones  I  take  to  be  those  of  the  leg,   though  I  am 
uncertain  in  regard  to  their  relative  position  with  cacli  otlier  mid   llic  icmm: 
35  G 


274 


ni 


The  specimen  represented  in  Fig.  10  I  suppose  lu  be  a  filnila,  though  it  may 
he  an  uhia.  It  is  a  broad  bone,  almost  as  wide  as  the  femur,  but  not  so  long. 
Its  flatness  has  been  somewhat  increased  by  pressure.  The  upper  extremity 
presents  a  wide,  lenticular,  uneven,  convex,  and  roughened  surface  for  carti- 
laginous union  witli  the  femur.  The  lower  extremity  presents  a  similar  sur- 
face, Init  wider  and  of  less  depth  or  thickness. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows: 

Liues. 

Length  of  fibula ".    66 

Width  of  upper  extremity 54: 

Thickuess  of  upper  extremity 21 

Width  of  lower  extremity,  partly  estimated 65 

Thickuess  of  lower  extremity 17 

Width  of  shaft  near  middle 38 

Thickness  of  shaft 13 

The  supposed  tibia,  represented  in  Fig.  11,  is  a  mucii  smaller  bone  than 
the  fibula.  It  is  clavate,  witli  the  lower  extremity  the  more  expanded  and 
thinner.  The  upper  part  of  the  shaft  is  compressed  cylindroid,  and  becomes 
wider  and  more  compressed  below.  The  upper  extremity  presents  a  trian- 
gularly oval,  slightly  convex,  articular  surface,  rugged  as  in  the  other  bones. 
The  lower  articular  surface  is  transversely  convex  and  widely  lenticular. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Length  of  the  tibia 45 

Width  of  upper  extremity 21 

Thickness  of  upper  extremity 14 

Width  of  lower  extremity 34 

Thickness  of  lower  extremity 11 

Width  of  narrowest  part  of  shaft 12 

Thickness  of  narrowest  part  of  shaft 10 

Tylosaurus  prorigee. 

Dr.  Sternberg's  collection  of  Kansas  Cretaceous  fossils,  ])reserved  in  tiie 
Museum  of  the  Smithsonian  Institution,  contains  specimens  pertaining  to 
several  individuals  of  a  large  Mosasaurus-like  reptile,  approximating  in  size 
the  Maestricht  Monitor  of  Europe,  and  tlie  Mosasaurus  MitcheUi  of  New 
Jersey.  The  specimens  appear  to  pertain  to  the  same  animal  as  that  de- 
scribed by  Professor  C-ope  under  the  names  of  Macrosai/rus  and  Liodon  pro- 
riger,  and  afterward,  as  in  the  case  of  the  former  species,  referred  to  another 
genus  by  Professor  Marsh,  under  the  name  of  Rhinosaurus,  then  by  Professor 


275 

Cope  to  Rliampliosauniy,  and  finally  by  Professor  Harsh  in  Tylosaurus.  A 
series  of  specimens  belonging  to  one  individnal,  from  the  yellow  chalk  ol 
Kansas,  consists  of  several'  small  fragments  of  jaws  with  bases  of  toetii,  a 
basi'OCcipital  bone,  and  five  vertebrsa. 

The  basiroccipital  is  obliquely  distorted,  from  pressure.  It  has  attached 
the  diverging  processes  of  the  basi-sphenoid.  The  condyle  has  approximated 
3  inches  in  transverse  diameter,  and  is  about  2  inches  in  depth.  The  diverg- 
ing processes  of  the  basi-sphenoid,  at  their  conjunction  with  the  basi-occipital, 
are  about  3f  inches  wide.  The  vertebras  are  all  more  or  less  crushed  ar/d 
distorted.  One  of  the  specimens,  a  posterior  cervical,  has  the  body  below  3 
inches  in  length,  and  the  truncated  hypapophysis  about  1^  inches  in  diam- 
eter.    The  articular  ball  and  socket  approximate  2^  inches  in  diameter. 

In  three  of  the  vertebral  specimens,  of  about  the  same  length  as  the  pre- 
ceding, the  hypapophysis  is  rudimental.  The  remaining  specimen  is  a  more 
posterior  dorsal,  and  is  of  nearly  the  same  size  as  the  other  vertebras. 

A  second  series  of  specimens,  belonging  to  another  individual,  consists  of 
several  much-mutilated  cervical  centra,  small  fragments  of  jaws  with  bases 
of  teeth,  a  coronoid  bone,  a  fragment  of  a  quadrate  bone,  and  the  end  of  the 
premaxillary. 

The  latter  specimen,  represented  in  Fig.  12,  Plate  XXXV,  exhibits  tlie 
peculiar  character  of  the  extremity  of  the  muzzle  in  Mosasaurus  and  its  allies. 
It  forms  a  solid,  conical,  osseous  prominence,  with  the  end  obtusely  rounded 
and  projecting  beyond  the  anterior  teeth.  The  sides  of  the  premaxillary 
toward  the  end  are  perforated  with  large"  vasculo-neural  foramina.  The  pro- 
jecting end  of  the  bone  extends  about  IJ  inches  in  advance  of  the  bases  of 
the  first  pair  of  teeth.  Immediately  in  front  of  the  latter  there  is  a  small 
conical  process. 

Several  specimens  of  a  third  individual  consist  of  a  caudal  verteljra  and 
two  teeth,  which,  from  the  adherent  matrix,  have  been  obtained  from  white 
or  creatn-colored  chalk. 

The  vertebra  is  comparatively  well  preserved,  not  being  crushed  nor  hav- 
ing its  body  distorted,  as  is  so  frequently  the  case  in  the  specimens  which 
have  come  under  my  observation.  It  is  from  the  caudal  series  wifhout 
diapophyses  or  transverse  processes,  and  is  represented  in  Figs.  1,  2,  Plate 
XXXVI.  The  posterior  ball,  defined  from  the  body  by  a  narrow  ledge,  and 
the  anterior  cup  are   nearly  circular,  with  a  slight   hexahedral   disposition 


276 

The  neural  arch  exliibits  rudiments  of  zygapophyses.  The  bottom  of  the 
body  is  provided  with  a  pair  of  deep,  conical  pits  for  the  attachment  of  a 
chevron-bone.  The  pits  are  defined  with  a  prominent  margin  most  project- 
ing anteriorly. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Leugth  of  the  body  inferiorly 20 

Diameter  of  the  body  at  the  extremities 30 

Of  the  two  specimens  of  teeth,  one  is  crushed  nearly  flat;  the  other,  well 
preserved,  is  represented  in  Fig.  3.  It  presents  the  usual  form  more  or  less 
characteristic  of  Mosasaurus.  It  is  curved  conical,  with  the  inner  and  outer 
surfaces  defined  by  acute  ridges.  The  surfaces  ai-e  subdivided  by  longitudinal 
ridges,  becoming  obsolete  toward  the  point  of  the  tooth.  The  intervals  of 
the  ridges  are  feebly  concave  and  faintly  rugose.  Internally  near  the  base 
they  are  delicately  striate. 

The  length  of  the  crown  externally  is  20  lines ;  the  diameter  at  base  is  10 
lines. 

Several  additional  specimens,  apparently  belonging  to  another  individual, 
consist  of  small  fragments  of  jaws  and  palatine  bones  with  bases  of  teetli. 
Among  the"  specimens  is  a  portion  of  a  splenial  bone,  with" its  posterior  artic- 
ular surface  nearly  entire,  as  represented  in  Fig.  13,  Plate  XXXV.  The 
articular  surface  is  a  pyriform  excavation,  with  a  ridge  descending  from  the 
upper  part  internally  to  near  its  center. 

LESTOSAURUS. 
Lestosaurus  coryph^us. 

Dr.  Sternberg's  collection  of  fossils  from  the  Smoky  Hill  River,  of  Kansas, 
belonging  to  the  Smithsonian  Institution,  contains  numerous  specimens  of 
dorsal  vertebrae  of  a  mosasauroid,  which  have  the  appearance  as  if  they  had 
pertained  to  a  single  individual.  There  are  about  fifty  of  these  vertebras, 
but  all  have  been  more  or  less  compressed  from  pressure  of  the  superincum- 
bent beds  to  that  in  which  they  lay,  so  that  not  a  single  specimen  preserves 
the  exact  original  lorni.  They  ditfer  but  little  in  size,  the  more  anterior 
being  somewhat  shorter  than  the  others. 

The  specimens  appear  to  belong  to  the  animal  described  by  Professor 
Cope  under  the  name  of  Holcodus  corypliceus,  which  Professor  Marsh  has 
referred  to  another  orcnus  with  the  name  of  Lestosaurus. 


277 

• 

Fig.  5,  Plate  XXXVI,  represents  one  of  the  best  preserved  of  the  speci- 
mens from  the  back  of  the  series.  In  its  present  condition  the  centrum 
beneath  is  27  Unes  long,  and  the  ball  and  socket  ends  are  about  16  lines  in 
depth  and  2  inches  in  width.  The  neural  atch  between  the  ends  of  the  fore 
and  aft  zygapophyses  measures  34  lines. 

Another  similar  specimen,  represented  in  Fig.  4,  exhibits  distinct  rudiineuts 
of  a  zygosphenal  articulation.     The  length  of  its  centrum  beneatli  is  33  lines. 

The  shortest  of  the  series  of  the  dorsals  measures  beneatli  about  2  inches 
in  length ;  the  longest  from  the  back  of  tlie  series  measures  about  3f  inches 
in  length. 

The  same  collection  contains  six  specimens  of  cervical  vertebrae,  which 
may  perhaps  belong  to  the  same  species,  if  not  the  same  individual,  as  the 
dorsals  above  noticed.  The  specimens  are  all  distorted  from  pressure.  One 
of  them  is  an  axis  without  the  odontoid  process  and  the  suturally  connected 
pieces  of  the  atlas.  The  articular  ball  of  the  centrum  is  transversely  hexa- 
gonally  oval,  1.2  inches  wide,  and  scarcely  1  inch  deep. 

Another  cervical  centrum,  in  some  degree  compressed  from  above  down- 
ward, is  represented  in  Fig.  6,  Plate  XXXVI.  It  measures  1.9  inches  in 
length  below  and  is  3  inches  wide  between  the  ends  of  the  transverse 
processes. 

Another  specimen,  represented  in  Fig.  7,  probably  a  second  cervical,  is 
nearly  complete,  but  considerably  distorted.  Its  measurements  are  as 
follows :  *  • 

luelies. 

Length  of  centrum  inferiorly 2.  00 

Length  between  fore  and  back  zygapophyses 2. 80 

Height  from  hypapophysis  to  end  of  spinous  process 3. 20 

De])th  of  posterior  ball  of  centrum 1. 55 

Width  of  posterior  ball  of  centrum 1.  05 

Dr.  Sternberg's  collection  further  contains  a  number  of  specimens  of 
caudal  vertebra,  probably  belonging  to  the  same  species  as  the  former,  anil 
apparently  pertaining  to  two  different  individuals.  There  are  twenty-six 
.specimens,  all  provided  wdth  diapophyses  or  transverse  processes,  and  with 
hypapophyses  for  chevron  articulation. 

Figs.  8,  9,  10,  Plate  XXXVI,  represent  the  first  and  last  of  a  consecutive 
series  of  four  anterior  caudals.  The  body  of  these  has  tiie  length  nearly  as 
great  as  the  breadth  and  about  equal  to  the  depth.  The  neural  arches  are 
without  zygapophyses,  or   exhibit   mere  rudiments  of  tiiein.     Tin-    articular 


278. 

• 

ball  anil  socket  are  wider  tiiau  high,  and  arc  widest  below  the  middle.  The 
outline  of  the  articular  surfaces  is  emarginatc  and  sloping  at  the  sides  above, 
and  seniicircular  below.  The  neural  canal  is  triangular.  The  transverse  pro- 
cesses project  obliquely  from  th"fe  lower  part  of  the  body,  and  they  become 
successively  narrower.  The  hypapophyses  are  excavated  into  deep  conical 
pits,  directed  obliquely  backward,  for  movable  ai-ticulation  with  chevrons. 
The  pits  are  small  in  the  first  of  the  series  of  specimens  and  become  succes- 
sively larger. 

Measurements  of  the  two  vertebrae  represented  are  as  follows : 


Inches.     1        Inches. 


Li^iigth  of  ceutrum,  including  edge  of  ball 

Width  of  ball 

Depth  of  ball 


1.  G5  1.  45 

1.75     I        1.65 
1.  50     1         1.  45 


In  a  consecutive  series  of  four  posterior  caudals  with  small  diapophyses, 
the  bodies  have  nearly  the  same  form  as  in  the  preceding,  but  the  articular 
extremities  are  of  more  uniform  diameter  and  of  a  more  hexahedral  outline. 
The  transverse  processes  are  small  and  project  just  below  the  center  of  the 
sides.  The  chevron-pits  are  well  developed,  and  resemble  those  of  the  pre- 
ceding caudal  specimens.  Two  of  the  caudals  are  represented  in  Figs.  11,  12, 
Plate  XXXVI. 

The  four  caodals  together  measure  f).3  inches  in  length.  The  diameters 
of  the  cup  of  the  first  of  the  series  is  1.4  inches  ;  the  diameters  of  the  ball 
of  the  last  of  the  series  is  1.3  inches. 

A  mutilated  posterior  caudal  centrum,  apparently  of  the  same  animal  as 
the  preceding,  is  without  diajjophyses,  but  has  well-produced  chevron-pits. 
The  length  of  the  centrum  is  less  than  the  depth,  and  this  is  greater  than  the 
width.  The  articular  ends  are  hexahedral  in  outline.  The  ceutrum 
measures  9  inch  in  length;   1.2  inches  wide,  and  1.3  inches  deep. 

The  same  collection  contains  the  greater  part  of  a  palate-bone,  with  teeth, 
represented  in  Fig.  12,  Plate  XXXIV,  which  may  perhaps  belong  to  the 
same  species  as  the  specimens  above  described.  The  specimen  contains  the 
remains  of  seven  teeth,  which  probably  is  within  two  or  three  of  the 
complete  series.  The  teeth  are  compressed  conical,  strongly  curved  back- 
ward or  hooked,  obtuse  in  Cront,  acute-edged  behind,  are  perfectly  smooth, 
and  present  no  facets  or  sul)divisioual  planes  of  the  surface. 


279 

Two  limb-bones,  represented  in  Figs  13,  14,  Plate  XXXVI,  pertaining 
to  the  same  collection,  are  supposed  also  to  belong  to  the  same  animal  as  the 
above.  I  feel  unable  to  determine  their  character.  The  broader  one  I  sup- 
pose to  be  an  ulna  or  a  fibnla.  It  resembles  in  its  shape  and  construction 
the  corresponding  bone  of  the  New  Mexico  mosasauroid,  represented  in  Fig. 
10,  Plate  XXXy,  but  is  much  smaller. 

Its  measurements  are  as  follows: 

Indies.  Lines. 

Leugth  at  the  upper  extremity - 4  3 

Breadth  of  upper  extremity 2  9 

Thickness  of  upper  extremity 10 

Breadth  of  lower  extremity 3  4 

Thickness  of  lower  extremity 7 

Width  of  shaft  at  middle 2  0 

Thickness  of  shaft  at  middle  0  11 

The  smaller  bone  of  Fig.  14  is  probably  a  radius  or  a  til)ia. 
Its  measurements  are  as  follows  : 

■Inches.  Lines. 

Length 3        7 

Breadth  of  upper  extremity •.  ■  - 1        4.} 

Thickness  of  upper  extremity 0        9 

Breadth  of  lower  extremity * 1  10 

Thickness  of  lower  extremity 0        9 

Width  of  shaft  at  middle 0 .       9 

Thickness  of  shaft  at  middle 0        7 

MOSASAURUS (?) 

The  cabinet  of  Swarthmore  College,  in  the  vicinity  of  Philadelphia,  con- 
tains a  number  of  fossils  from  the  Cretaceous  formation  of  Nebraska,  pre- 
sented by  Mr.  George  S.  Truman.  They  were  collected  by  him  from  the 
hills  on  the  Missouri  River,  near  the  Santee  Agency,  in  L'Eau  qui  Court 
County.  They  consist  of  bones  and  teeth  of  fishes  and  reptiles,  among 
v^^hich  are  a  number  pertaining  to  the  Polycotylus  latiinnnls  of  Professor 
Cope,  originally  described  from  remains  found  in  Kansas. 

An  anterior  caudal  vertebra  of  a  Mosasaurus,  in  Mr.  Truman's  collection, 
is  represented  in  Fig.  15,  Plate  XXXVI.  The  vertebra  has  the  Ibrm  usually 
assigned  to  the  genus.  It  retains  the  neural  arch,  but  has  lost  its  spine. 
From  the  lower  part  of  the  body  project  the  roots  of  strong  transverse  pro- 
cesses.    Beneath  the  body  there  is  a  strong  pair  of  eminences  projecting  just 


280 

back  of  the  middle  and  terminating  in  nearly  flat  articular  fliccts  fur  a  chevron. 
The  surface  between  these  eminences  forms  a  moderately  deep  concavity. 
The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows: 

Lines. 

Lengtli  of  the  body  beneath 31 

Depth  anteriorly 35 

Breadth  anteriorly 42 

Mr.  Truman's  collection  contains  several  t;eeth  which  may  probably  belong 
to  the  same  animal  as  tlie  vertebra  just  described. 

The  largest  of  the  teeth  is  represented  in  Fig.  18,  Plate  XXXIV.  It  pre- 
sents the  usual  mosasauroid  form,  being  curved  conical,  with  the  inner  and 
outer  surfaces  unequal  in  extent  and  degree  of  convexity  and  separated  by 
acute  ridges  becoming  more  prominent  near  the  apex  of  the  crown.  The 
enamel  is  longitudinally  striate,  especially  toward  the  base  of  the  crown, 
where  more  marked  ridges  show  a  tendency  to  divide  the  surfaces  into  narrow 
planes. 

The  specimen  is  a  shed  tooth,  and  measures  a  little  more  than  2  inches  in 
length ;  and  the  diameter  at  base  is  about  14  lines. 

A  second  tooth,  represented  in  Fig.  21,  has  nearly  the  same  characters 
as  the  former.  It  is  smalle*,  more  compressed,  so  that  its  section  is 
more  elliptical,  and  its  inner  and  outer  surfaces  are  more  equal.  It  is  also 
a  shed  specimen,  and  measures  IJ  inches  in  length.  Its  base,  an  outline  of 
which  is  seen  in  Fig.  22,  measures  10  lines  fore  and  aft,  and  8  lines  trans- 
versely. 

The  third  specimen,  represented  in  Fig.  19,  has  nearly  the  same  form  as 
the  preceding,  but  has  its  surfaces  distinctly  subdivided  into  narrow,  slightly 
depressed,  smooth  planes,  of  which  there  are  six  externally  and  seven  intei-- 
nally.  Transverse  outlines  of  the  base  and  of  the  crown  a  short  distance 
above  are  given  in  Fig.  20.  The  length  of  the  tooth,  also,  like  the  other,  a 
shed  sjiecimen,  has  been  about  20  lines.  The  diameter  of  the  base  fore  and 
aft  is  lOf  lines;  transversely  8|-  lines. 

Fig.  16  represents  a  small  tooth,  accompanying  the  former  specimens, 
which  I  suppose  to  be  from  the  back  pari  of  the  series  of  the  same  spe- 
cies as  the  teeth  of  Figs.  18  and  21.  It  is  more  curved  in  proportion 
with  its  length  than  in  these,  but  has  nearly  the  same  outline  in  trans- 
verse section,  and  has  the  enamel  striated  in  the  same  manner.  Its  length 
when  complete  has  been  about  an  inch.  Its  diameter  at  base  fore  and  aft 
is  64  lines;  transversely .6  lines. 


281 

CLIDASTES. 

The  extinct  reptiliiin  genus' CUdastes,  characterized  by  Professor  Cope, 
is  especially  distinguished  from  Mosasaurus  and  its  nearer  allies  by  the 
possession  of  an  additional  mode  of  articulation  to  the  ordinary  one  in 
the  vertebrae,  such  as  is  found  in  the  living  iguanas.  The  vertebrae  are 
otherwise  nearly  like  those  of  Mosasaurus.  The  general  form  and  construc- 
tion of  the  skull  and  the  character  of  the  dentition  are  the  same  in  both 
genera. 

Half  a  dozen  species  of  CUdastes  have  been  indicated  by  Professors  Cope 
and  Marsh,  from  remains  found  in  the  Cretaceous  formations  of  New  Jersey, 
Alabama,  and  Kansas. 

Clidastes  intekmedius. 

A  species  different  from  those  described  by  the  authors  just  named  is 
indicated  by  a  small  collection  of  remains,  presented  to  the  writer  by  Dr.  J. 
C.  Nott,  formerly  of  Mobile.  The  specimens,  consisting  of  several  jaw-frag- 
ments and  vertebrae,  were  taken  from  an  excavation  40  feet  beneath  tlie 
surface,  imbedded  in  the  rotten  limestone, .  of  Cretaceous  age,  in  Pickens 
County,  Alabama. 

The  remains  indicate  a  species  of  more  robust  proportions  than  Clidastes 
propi/tlwn,  described  by  Professor  Cope,  from  the  great  part  of  a  skeleton 
discovered  in  the  same  formation  near  Uniontown,  Alabama.  It  was  a  third 
less  in  size  than  the  typical  species  C.  iguanavus,  described  by  the  same 
author,  from  an  isolated  dorsal  vertebra  obtained  from  the  Cretaceous  green 
sand  of  New  Jersey. 

Fig.  1,  Plate  XXXIV,  represents  the  anterior  extremity  of  a  dentary  bone, 
probably  more  than  one-half  of  the  whole.  It  would  appear  to  have  been 
proportionately  of  greater  depth  and  thickness  in  relation  with  its  length  thim 
in  C.  propython.  It  is  also  of  more  uniform  depth  at  its  fore  part  and  less 
pointed  at  the  end. 

The  fragment  contains  the  remains  of  a  series  of  nine  teeth,  occupying  a 
space  of  5^  inches.  The  teeth  surmount  robust  osseous  pedestals,  of  which 
about  Iwo-thirds  of  the  length  are  included  within  about  an  equal  extent  of 
the  depth  of  the  jaw. 

The  crown  of  a  second  tooth,  (Fig.  5,)  inclosed  within  a  cavity  of  the 
pedestal  of  its  predecessor,  is  5  lines  in  Icngtli  and  about  2i-  lines  in  l)rca(lth 
36  G 


282 

at  base.  It  is  curved  conical,  feebly  compressed  from  without  inwardly,  and 
has  its  inner  and  outer  surfaces  well  defined  b.y  acute  borders.  The  exposed 
inner  surface  of  the  crown  exhibits  no  divisional  planes,  and  lias  its  enamel 
minutely  wrinkled. 

The  crown  of  a  tooth  (Fig.  4)  occupying  a  corresponding  cavity  of  the 
ninth  pedestal,  probably  not  fully  produced  in  its  length,  in  its  present  condi- 
tion has  a  breadth  exceeding  the  latter.  The  crown  is  a  broad  cone  about 
the  length  of  the  tooth  first  described,  ])ut  with  double  the  width  at  base. 
The  exposed  inner  surface  is  defined  in  the  usual  manner  from  the  outer,  and 
exhibits  no  divisional  planes.     The  enamel  is  minutely  wrinkled. 

The  depth  of  the  jaw-fragment  below  the  visible  base  externally  of  the 
first  dental  pedestal  is. three-fourths  of  an  inch ;  the  depth  below  the  seventh 
pedestal  is  14^  lines. 

The  s[)lenial  bone  -advanced  as  far  as  the  back  part  of  the  sixth  tooth. 
Beyond  it  the  Meckelian  groove  is  deep  and  wide  compared  with  that  in  C. 
yropython,  and  extends  to  near  the  end  of  the  jaw. 

Fig.  2  represents  a  posterior  fragment  of  the  opposite  dentary  bone,  con- 
taining the  remains  of  a  series  of  six  teeth.  The  mutilated  crowns  of  the 
anterior  two  teeth  retained  in  the  specimen  exhibit  a  swollen  base,  which 
may  also  be  seen  to  be  the  case  in  the  crowns  of  the  sixth  and  seventh  teeth 
of  the  anterior  dentary  fragment. 

From  the  two  fragments  of  opposite  dentary  bones  I  am  unable  to  ascer- 
tain the  number  of  teeth  which  belonged  to  the  complete  series,  but  it  seems 
to  me  that  the  seventh  tooth  of  the  anterior  fragment  about  corresponds  with 
the  first  retained  tooth  of  the  posterior  fragment,  which  would  indicate  a 
series  of  twelve  teeth. 

Fig.  10  represents  an  axis  from  the  same  individual  as  the  preceding  speci- 
mens. It  has  the  same  form  as  that  of  C.  i^yopijihon.  The  odontoid  process, 
and  the  elements  of  the  atlas,  all  of  which  articulate  suturally  with  the  axis, 
are  detached  from  the  specimen  and  do  not  accompany  it. 

I'lie  measurements  of  the  axis  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Length  of  body  tbrough  center,  devoid  of  odoutoid  process 18 

Breadth  of  axis  between  posterior  ends  of  diapophyses , 28 

Widtli  of  posterior  ball -. lOJ 

Height  of  posterior  ball r  ■  - •    -  r  -    10 

Width  of  hypopopliysis 8 

Two  mutilated  dorsal  vertebrae  exhibit  the  zygosphenes  and  zygantra  as 


283- 

well  developed  ])roporlionately  as  in  Clidastes  propi/tlion.     Measurenieiils  of 
the  better  preserved  of  the  specimens  arc  as  follows  : 

Liues. 

Leugtli  of  the  boil.v  iiiferiorly : IS 

Width  of  the  ball  and  socket 12 

Height  of  the  ball  and  socket 10 

Clidastes  affinis. 

Some  remains  submitted  to  my  examination  by  the  Smithsonian  Institution 
-may  perhaps  indicate  a  species  of  .Clidastes  distinct  from  the  former.  The 
specimens  were  discovered  by  Dr.  George  M.  Sternberg,  "United  States  Army, 
in  the  Cretaceous  formation  on  the  Smoky-Hill  River,  Kansas. 

Fig.  6,  Plate  XXXIV,  represents  a  nearly  complete  dentary  bone,  which 
is  accompanied  by  that  of  the  opposite  side.  It  contains  the  remains  of  a 
series  of  twelve  teeth,  while  there  is  one  less  in  the  other  bone. 

The  anterior  extremity  of  the  jaw  is  of  rather  less  depth  and  slightly 
greater  thickness  than  in  the  corresponding  part  of  Clidastes  intermcdius. 
The  splenial  bone  appears  to  have  I'eached  as  far  forward  as  the  position  of 
the  fourth  tooth. 

The  anterior  teeth  appear  to  have  been  larger,  and  the  intermediate  ones 
smaller,  than  in  C.  intermedius,  though  this  may  have  been  a  variable  char- 
acter in  the  same  species.  Portions  of  the  bases  of  the  crowns  of  several  of 
the  back  teeth  exhibit  the  enamel  strongly  striated,  and  the  surfaces  of  the 
teeth  also  present  evidences  of  subdivision  into  narrow  planes. 
.  A  fragment  from  the  back  part  of  a  maxillary  from  the  same  individual 
contains  the  bases  of  four  teeth.  The  last  of  the  series  retains  part  of  the 
crown,  which  is  strongly- striated  internally,  and  distinctly  subdivided,  into 
narrow  planes  externally.  In  the  remains  of  the  teeth  of  the  specimens 
referred  to  C.  intermedius  there  is  no  trace  of  subdivisional  planes  to  the 
crowns,  but  this  may  have  been  a  variable  character  in  the  species. 

Fig.  7  represents  the  back  part  of  the  right  ramus  of  the  mandible  of  the 
same  individual,  seen  on  its  inner  side.  It  exhibits  the  same  construction  as 
the  corresponding  part  in  C.  propython.  The  articulation  is  nearly  equally 
divided  between  the  angular  and  articular  bones. 

Measurements  of  the  jaw-specimens  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Length  of  dentary  bone 12G 

Length  of  serie.s  of  twelve  teeth Ill 

Depth  of  jaw  below  first  tooth 10 


•284 

Lines. 

Depth  of  jaw  below  fourth  tooth 11 

Depth  of  jaw  at  the  outer  side  of  the  glenoid  articulation 24 

Length  of  projection  back  of  the  glenoid  articulation 20 

Transverse  diameter  of  glenoid  articulation 18 

Vertical  diameter  of  glenoid  articulation 16 

An  axis  and  a  dorsal  vertebra  accompanying  the  former  specimens  probably 
pertained  to  the  same  individual.  They  are  both  considerably  distorted  from 
pressure  at  the  sides. 

The  axiS'is  rather  longer  than  that  of  C.  interniedius,  while  its  liypopophysis 
is  considerably  smaller  at  the  extremity,  and  the  ball  of  the  centrum  is  more 
uniform  in  diameter,  or  is  less  emarginate  above.  The  lower  element  of  the 
atlas  remains  in  firm  sutural  connection  with  the  body  of  the  axis,  but  the 
odontoid  element  of  the  latter  and  the  lateral  elements  of  the  atlas  are  absent. 

The  dorsal  specimen  retains  the  neural  arch  with  its  characteristic  zygail- 
tral  articulation. 

Measurements  of  the  vertebrae  are  as  follows  : 


Length  of  axis  through  center  of  the  body 


Lines. 
>>>> 


Width  of  ball  of  body  of  axis 10^ 

Height  of  ball  of  body  of  axis 104- 

Length  of  body  of  dorsal  vertebra  iuferiorly 22 

Accompanying  the  former  specimens  there  are  several  othei's  which,  if 
they  did  not  pertain  to  the  same  individual,  probably  belonged  to  the  same 

species. 

Two  fragments  of  the  upper  part  of  the  cranium  represented  in  Fig.  8 
resemble  the  corresponding  portions  in  Clidastes  propijtlion^  as  described  and 
figured  by  Professor  Cope,  and  differ  only  in  the  greater  size.  Fig.  9  repre- 
sents an  isolated  basi-sphenoid  bone,  probal)ly  from  the  same  skull. 

These  skull-fragments  indicate  an  animal  about  one-third  larger  than  C. 
propython^  as  described  by  Professor  Cope. 

It  is  a  question  of  some  importance  how  far.  difference  in  size  among  the 
mosasauroids  may  be  a  test  of  difference  in  species.  Among  the  numerous 
remains  of  these  animals  which  have  been  discovered  I  have  never  yet 
observed  any  which  presented  any  evidence  relating  to  age.  In  no  case 
have  I  seen  a  vertebra  in  which  the  neural  arch  was  not  continuous  with  the 
centrum,  so  that  I  have  been  led  to  suspect  that  the  former  grew  out  of  the 
latter,  as  in  most  fishes,  and  was  never  united  with  it  by  articulation,  as  in 
the  crocodiles,  &c.     In  this  view  of  the  case,  some  of  the  many  described 


285 

species  of  mosasauruids  may  have  been  foundccl  on  differeiit  ages  of  the 
same. 

Fig.  11  represents  a  humerus  accompanying  the  former  specimens,  and 
probably  belonging  to  the  same  species,  if  not  the  same  individual.  In  its 
form  and  construction  it  closely  resembles  the  corresponding  bone  of  C.  2^>'o- 
python. 

The  specimen  is  somewhat  crushed,  which  perhaps  to  some  extent  makes 
it  appear  proportionately  flatter  than  the  humerus  of  C.  propython,  described 
and  figured  by  Professor  Cope. 

The  length  of  the  bone  does  not  exceed  the  breadth  of  its  distal  extremity, 
which  is  the  wider  one. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Length  of  humerus  at  middle 35 

Breadth  of  iiroximal  extremity 28 

Breadth  of  distal  extremity 35 

Breadth  at  constricted  middle  of  shaft 20 

Thickness  of  head 8i 

Thickness  of  distal  end 9^ 

Order  Lacertilia.  (J) 

TYLOSTEUS. 

Tylosteus  oenatus. 

The  above  name  has  been  proposed  for  a  supposed  genus  of  lacertian 
reptiles,  founded  on  a  singular  fossil  represented  in  Fig.  14,  Plate  XIX. 
The  specimen  was  obtained  by  Professor  Hayden  in  the  "Black  Foot" 
country,  at  the  head  of  the  Missouri  River,  and  was  probably  derived  from 
the  Cretaceous  formation.  It  looks  as  if  it  might  be  an  element  of  the 
osseous  dermal  armor  of  some  animal,  whether  reptile  or  mammal  is  by  no 
means  certain,  though,  as  before  intimated,  I  suspect  the  former. 

The  specimen  is  imperfect  or  broken  at  the  borders.  Its  inner  surface  is 
concave !•  the  outer  convex,  and  ornamented  with  large  mammillary  bosses. 
The  latter  are  about  fifteen  in  number  and  of  different  sizes.  They  are 
porous  and  of  a  less  dense  character  than  their  shield-like  basis.  The 
diameter  of  the  fossil  is  about  2  inches  ;  its  thickness  an  inch. 

Accompanying  the  specimen  just  described  there  is  an  isolated  phalanx, 
represented  in  Fig.  13.  Though  suspected  to  pertain  to  the  same  animal, 
the  reference  is  uncertain.     It  is  a  ierminul  phalanx  nearly  2   inches  long. 


286 

and  with  the  expanded  extremity  nearly  circular  at  the  border  and  16  lines 
wide.  The  upper  part  of  the  bone  presents  a  nearly  straight  slope  in  its 
length,  and  is  convex  transversely.  The  under  part  is  likewise  straight  along 
the  middle,  transversely  convex  posteriorly,  and  nearly  flat  at  the  expanded 
end.  The  lower  surface  of  the  latter  presents  near  the  middle  a  pair  of 
vascular  foramina,  and  several  similar  foramina  are  found  near  the  border. 
The  articular  end  is  transversely  -elliptical  and  barely  depressed.  Its  trans- 
verse diameter  is  15  lines;  its  vertical  diameter  10^  lines. 

Order  Sauro])te7-ijgia. 
OLIGOSIMUS. 

OlIGOSIMUS  GRANDiEVUS. 

A  fossil  ol)tained  on  Henry's  Fork  of  Grreen  River,  Wyoming,  during 
Professor  Hayden's  exploration  of  1870,  would  appear  to  indicate  an  extinct 
reptile  allied  to  Plesiosaurus  and  Discosaurus.  In  general  aspect,  the 
specimen  is  different  from  those  in  company  with  it,  and  I  think  it  doubtful 
whether  it  was  an  associate  of  the  other  fossils,  which  belong  to  the  Bridger 
Tertiary  formation.  It  was  found  as  a  detached  specimen,  and  has  no 
adherent  matrix.     It  probably  is  of  Cretaceous  age. 

The  fossil,  represented  of  natural  size  in  Figs.  18,  19,  Plate  XVI,  consists 
of  the  body  of  a  caudal  vertebra,  apparently  from  the  root  of  the  tail.  It 
was  evidently  from  a  mature  animal,  as  the  neural  arch  was  firmly  co-ossified, 
leaving  no  trace  of  the  original  separation. 

In  shape  and  construction  the  body  resembles  the  corresponding  portion 
of  the  vertebrae  in  Plesiosaurus  and  Discosaurus,  but  the  proportion  of  length 
to  the  other  dimensions  is  much  less,  and  the  depth  also  is  not  so  great. 

The  body  is  biconcave,  the  concavities  being  of  moderate  and  nearly  equal 
depth.  Deepest  at  the  central  half  of  the  area,  the  peripheral  half  of  the 
articular  surfaces  becomes  more  aljruptly  shallower,  and  with  the  deflexed 
edges  somewhat  convex.  Near  the  border,  the  articular  surfaces  are  defined 
by  -a  narrow  circular  groove. 

The  posterior  articular  surface  of  the  body  at  the  sides  below  is  deflected 
in  a  pair  of  widely  separated  facets  for  a  chevron-l>one.  The  facets  are 
sustained  on  processes  extending  forward  more  than  a  third  of  tlie  length  of 
the  body.     Similar  facets  and  processes  are  absent  on  the  front  of  the  bone. 


2&7 

Tlie  sides  of"  ilie  IxkIv  are  coinparativcly  fcel)ly  coiistriclcd,  much  leys  lliau 
in  Plesiosaurus,  and  beneath,  the  constriction  is  triHing  in  degree. 

Transverse  processes  or  diapophyses  project  from  the  sides  of  tlie  l)ody, 
just  above  its  middle  and  below  tlic  conjunction  of  the  neural  arch.  Their 
bases  ate  broadly  conical;  wider  than  high,  and  appear  originally  to  have  had 
a  sutural  connection.     The  ends  are  broken  off  in  the  specimen. 

The  nsual  nutritive  foramina  are  visible  at  the  floor  of  the  verteljral  canal 
and  beneath  the  body. 

The  peculiarities  of  the  fossil  appear  to  justify  its  reference  to  a  previously 
undescribed  genus  and  species,  and  we  have  therefore  attributed  it  to  an 
animal  with  the  name  at  the  head  of  this  chapter. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows: 

Lines. 

Lengtli  of  body  beneatb 12 

Depth  of  body  in  front 19 

Width  of  body  iu  front 23 

Widtli  of  body  at  chevron-facets .  18 

Width  of  vertebral  canal 6 

Leugtb  of  axis  of  tlie  body  8 

NOTHOSxiURUS. 

NOTHOSAURUS    OCCIDUUS. 

The  above  name  was  appropriated  to  a  saurian  indicated  by  a  detached 
vertebral  body  or  centrum,  represented  in  Figs.  11  to  13,  Plate  XV.  The 
specimen  was  obtained  by  Professor  Hayden  on  the  Moreau  River,  a  tribu-. 
tary  of  the  Upper  Missouri,  and  is  probably  a  Cretaceous  fossil.  In  form  and 
construction  it  resembles  the  vertebral  centra  of  Nothosaurus,  an  extinct 
reptile  of  the  Triassic  formation  of  Europe,  and  probably  it  belongs  to  an 
animal  of  the  same  order  if  not  the  same  genus.  The  specimen  appears  to 
pertain  to  a  dorsal  vertebra,  to  which  the  neural  arcli  was  attached  by  broad 
suture,  as  usual  in  the  sauropterygians. 

The  body  is  nearly  cylindric,  longer  than  wide  or  liigh,  and  is  moderately 
narrowed  a  short  distance  from  the  ends.  Inferiorly  it  jirescnts  a  central 
roughness,  probably  for  ligamentous  attachment.  The  articular  ends  are 
nearly  round,  but  flattened  above,  and  are  neai'ly  as  wide  as  high.  They  are 
slightly  concave  and  exhibit  a  slight  central  protuberance,  apparently  the 
ossified  notochord. 

The   sutures   for   the  neural  arch   extend   nearly  three-fourths  the  length 


288 

of  the  centrum  from  its  posterior  end,  and  they  reach  downward  to  the 
middle  of  the  sides.  The  bottom  of  the  spinal  canal  is  narrowest  at  the 
middle,  grooved  on  each  side,  and  widens  toward  the  ends  of  the  centrum. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows :  Length  of  centrum, 
1  inch;  depth  in  front,  10^-  lines;  width,  10  hnes. 

FISHE8. 

TELEOSTEI. 

Order  Acantlwpteri. 

Sphyr^nid^. 

CLADOCYCLUS. 
Cladocyclus  occidentalis. 

The  genus  of  fishes  above  named  was  proposed  by  Agassiz  on  some  remains 
consisting  of  large  scales  and  portions  of  a  vertebral  column  found  in  the  chalk 
of  Lewes,  England.  The  name  was  applied  on  account  of  the  branching  of 
the  tube  in  the  scales  of  the  lateral  line ;  and  the  fish  was  referred  to  the 
sphyreenoids.     (Poissons  Fossiles,  V,  103  ;  Atlas  V,  Tab.  25  a,  Figs.  5,  6.) 

Some  large  scales,  found  by  Dr.  John  E.  Evans,  and  subsequently  by  Pro- 
fessor Hayden  and  Mr.  Meek,  in  ash-colored  shales  of  the  Cretaceous  series 
of  Nebraska,  I  have  supposed  to  belong  to  the  same  or  a  nearly  allied  genus. 
The  scales  vary  in  form  and  size,  and  may  probably  belong  to  several  species. 
Mostly  they  are  oval,  with  the  length  but  little  more  than  half  the  depth, 
while  others  are  circular,  and  these  may  really  pertain  to  a  different  species, 
if  not  genus,  from  the  former. 

A  broad  oval  scale,  somewhat  distorted  and  broken  at  the  edges,  is  repre- 
sented in  Fig.  5,  Plate  XXX.  The  inner  portion  exhibits  numerous  radi- 
ating ridges,  while  the  outer  portion,  separated  from  the  former  by  a  narrow 
smooth  tract,  presents  a  minutely  tubercular  or  granular  aspect.  The  depth 
of  this  scale  is  estimated  to  have  been  nearly  2^  inches,  and  its  length  nearly 
1^  inches. 

Another  similar  but  less  perfect  specimen  appears  to  have  measured  about 
If  inches  wide  by  \\  inches  long. 

A  third  specimen^  represented  in  Fig.  21,  Plate  XVII,  has  measured  rather 
more  than  1  inch  wide  and  f  inch  in  length. 

Another  scale,  represented  in  Fig.  22,  has  (he  same  structure  as  the  pre- 


289 

ceding,  but  is  circular  in  tbrai.     Its  difimeter  is  about  14  lines.     This  prob- 
ably belongs  to  a  ilillerent  species,  and  perhaps  genus,  from  the  ibrnier. 

x\nother  specimen  is  a  nearly  smooth  oval  scale,  which  has  been  about  13 
lines  wide  and  9  lines  long.  It  exhibits  obscure  radiant  lines  on  the  inner 
portion,  but  no  granulations  are  evident  on  the  outer  portion.  This  may 
belong  to  another  fish  than  that  of  the  preceding  specimens. 

ENCHODUS. 

Enciiodus  Shumakdi. 

The  extinct  genus  above  named  was  inferred  by  Agassiz  from  some  remains, 
consisting  of  jaws  and  teeth,  found  in  the  chalk  of  Europe,  and  was  by  him 
attributed  to  the  sphyreenoid  family.  Several  species  have  been  since  de- 
scribed from  similar  remains  found  in  the  deposits  of  Cretaceous  age  in  the 
United  States.  .  One  of  these,  under  the  above  specific  name,  was  indicated 
Iiy  a  dentary  bone  with  teeth,  found  by  Dr.  Benjamin  F.  Shumard  in  the  same 
formation  in  which  were  discovered  the  large  scales  referred  to  Cladocyclus. 

The  specimen  is  rudely  represented  in  a  reversed  position  in  Fig.  20,  Plate 
XVII.  The  dentary  margin  of  the  bone  is  11  lines  long,  and  contains  six  long 
narrow  teeth,  and  in  the  back  intervals  a  number  of  minute  ones. 

The  first  of  the  larger  teeth  is  the  longest,  and  is  situated  a  short  distance 
from  the  end  of  the  bone.  Including  its  thickened  base  it  is  2  lines  long  by 
about  one-fifth  of  a  line  wide.  It  is  a  long,  narrow,  straight  cone,  laterally  com- 
pressed, trenchant  at  the  borders,  and  ends  in  a  point  with  a  slight  posterior 
projection  or  half  barb.  The  posterior  five  larger  teeth  are  situated  at  irreg- 
ular distances  apart,  and  measure  from  one  to  one  and  one-fiflli  lines  in 
length  by  about  one-sixth  of  a  line  in  breadth  at  base.  They  are  nearly  like 
the  largest  tooth,  but  are  slightly  more  curved,  and  have  no  projection  to  the 
back  of  the  point.  The  minute  teeth  in  the  back  intervals  of  the  larger  ones 
and  back  of  these  arc  not  over  the  one-fifth  of  a  line  long. 

PHASGANODUS. 

PlIASGANOEUS   DIRUS. 

An  extinct  genus  of  fishes  sujiposed  to  belong  to  the  sphyrajnoid  family, 
and  nearly  related  with  Enchodus,  has  been  described  under  the  above  name. 
It  was  inferred  from  a  specimen  of  a  mutilated  dentary  bone  with  teeth, 
37  G 


290 

imbedded  in  a  piece  of  brown  sandstone,  obtained  by  Professor  Hayden  from 
a  Cretaceous  deposit  he  has  indicated  as  No.  5,  on  Cannon  Ball  River. 

The  specimen  with  the  remains  of  five  large  teeth,  reduced  one-third,  is 
represented  in  Fig.  24,  Plate  XVII.  The  third  tooth  of  the  series,  preserved 
entire  and  separated  from  the  former,  is  represented  in  Fig.  23. 

The  dentary  bone  exhibits  nothing  peculiar  in  the  present  condition  of  the 
fossil,  and  appears  not  to  liave  differed  in  any  important  point  from  that  of 
Enchodus. 

The  teeth  differ  from  those  of  the  latter.  They  are  proportionately  shorter, 
saber-like,  and  situated  on  broad  bases,  with  an  oblique  direction  to  the  edge 
of  the  jaw.  The  thick  back  border  is  directed  inwardly ;  the  trenchant 
border  forward  and  outward.  The  point  is  cut  off  in  a  slanting  manner  pos- 
teriorly. The  back  part  of  the  crown  toward  tiie  base  and  extending  on  the 
sides  is  fluted,  but  toward  the  point  and  trenchant  border  is  smooth.  In  sec- 
tion the  crown  is  ovate,  with  the  long  diameter  2|  lines.  The  length  of  the 
tooth,  including  its  thickened  base,  is  10  lines;  without  the  base,  the  crown 
measures  7  lines. 

Order  Malacoyteri. 
SlLURID^E.   (I) 

XIPHACTINUS. 

XiPHACTINUS   AUDAX. 

Under  the  above  name,  I  described  an  ichthyodorulite  belonging  to  the 
collection  of  the  Smithsonian  Institution.  The  specimen  was  obtained  from 
the  Cretacous  formation  of  Kansas,  by  Dr.  George  M.  Sternberg,  United  States 
Army.  I  supposed  it  to  l)e  the  pectoral  spine  of  a  large  siluroid  fish,  but 
according  to  Professor  Cope,  who  has  had  the  opportunity  of  examining  many 
remains  of  fishes  from  the  Cretaceous  formation  of  Kansas,  it  belongs  to  a 
fish  of  a  peculiar  family.  This  he  names  Saurodontidee,  represented  by  Sau- 
rocephalus  and  some  other  genera.  At  first  the  spine  was  referred  to  the 
last-named  genus,  but  latterly  he  appears  to  be  in  doubt  whether  it  belongs 
to  this  or  some  other  nearly  allied  genus.  The  specimen  is  represented  in 
Figs.  9,  10,  Plate  XVII,  one-third  the  diameter  of  nature. 

The  spine  is  unsymmetrical,  thus  rendering  it  probable  that  it  belonged  to 
one  of  the  lateral  pairs  of  fins  rather  than  to  any  of  the  vertical  fins.  It  is 
a  broad   saber-shaped  wenpon,  in  its  present  condition   about  16  inches  in 


291 

length,  which  is  nearly  its  entire  extent,  judging  from  the  tliinning  and  round- 
ing of  the  broken  end.  Its  breadth  the  greater  part  of  the  length  is  nearly 
uniform,  and  at  tlic  middle  is  nearly  2  inches.  Toward  the  distal  end  it 
becomes  slightly  less  wide  and  thinner;  toward  the  proximal  end  it  undei'goes 
a  greater  reduction  in  width,  and  becomes  much  thicker. 

The  upper  surface  of  the  spine,  represented  in  Fig.  10,  for  the  most  [)arl 
is  nearly  Hat  except  toward  the  rounded  borders.  It  is  invested  with  a 
tliiu  layer  of  ossific  substance  of  a  nnn-e  dense  character  than  the  compact 
bone  beneath.  The  surface  is  striated  or  ornamented  with  raised  lines,  which 
are  longitudinal  and  parallel,  but  on  portions  of  the  surftice  are  somewhat 
irregular.  Some  of  the  lines  branch,  and  the  slightly  divergent  branches 
include  other  commencing  lines.  At  the  distal  end  of  the  spine,  near  the 
anterior  border,  the  lines  break  up  into  finer  branches  which  curve  outwardly 
to  the  edge. 

The  under  surface  of  the  spine  (Fig.  9)  is  uneven.  A  prominent  ridge, 
commencing  at  its  proximal  extremity  and  occupying  more  than  two-thirds 
its  width,  extends  outwardly  and  gradually  declines  to  a  point  near  the  center 
of  the  inferior  surface.  A  shallow  groove  commences  in  front  of  the  ridge, 
widens  outwardly,  and  extends  beyond  the  former  upon  the  anterior  half  of 
the  inferior  surface  of  the  spine.  Back  of  the  commencement  of  the  ridge 
there  is  a  concave  hollow,  which  narrows  outwardly  into  a  deep  groove,  and 
this,  pursuing  the  same  course,  widens  and  opens  downward  upon  the  posterior 
half  of  the  inferior  surface  of  the  spine  to  its  distal  end. 

The  posterior  groove  for  nearly  half  its  length  proximally  exhibits  a  row 
of  irregular  pits  at  the  bottom.  The  upper  boundary  of  the  groove  in  advance 
of  the  pits  is  transversely  striate,  and  beyond  the  position  of  the  pits  exter- 
nally the  corresponding  surface  presents  the  striae  curling  outward  to  the 
back  edge  of  the  spine.  The  bottom  of  the  groove,  external  to  the  position 
of  the  pits,  continues  as  a  shallow  channel  running  along  the  middle  of  the 
spine  inferiorly  to  its  distal  end. 

The  anterior  border  of  the  spine  is  convex  in  the  length,  obtuse  internally, 
and  acute  externally.  The  posterior  border  is  concave  longitudinally,  obtuse 
internally,  and  less  acute  externally  than  the  anterior  border. 

The  inner  extremity  of  the  spine  appears  bent  upward  into  a  hook-like 
eminence  with  a  pyramidal  base  extending  above  the  general  level  of  the 
spine.     The  end  of  the  hook-like  process  is  broken  off.     Its  inner  surface 


292 

forms  an  ellipsoidal  longitudinal  convexity,  with  the  lower  half  more 
prominent  and  appearing  to  be  an  articular  eminence.  The  outer  extremity 
of  the  spine  is  broken,  but  it  appears  to  have  been  rounded  transversely, 
though  it  may  have  been  pointed. 

The  measurements  of  the  spine  are  as  follows: 

Inches. 

Lengtli  of  the  spiue  iu  its  present  couclitiou IG 

Lines. 

Breadth  of  the  spiue  beyond  the  articular  hook 17 

Breadth  at  the  iuuer  third 21 

Breadth  at  tlie  middle 23 

Breadth  uear  the  distal  eud 20 

Thickness  of  the  spine  beyond  the  articular  hook 14 

Thickness  at-  the  inner  third 9J 

Thickness  at  the  middle - 6 

Thickness  near  the  distal  end 3 

The  transverse  section  of  the  spine  near  the  middle  forms  an  irregular 

ellipse,  as  represented  in  the  accompanying 
figure.  The  left-hand  side  beneath  represents 
the  posterior  groove  opening  downward. 

Since  writing  the  above,*  I  have  had  the  op- 
portunity of  examining  the  proximal  half  of  a  similar  spine,  from  L'Eau 
qui  Court  County,  Nebraska.  It  was  found  in  association  with  remains  of 
Mosasaiirus,  &c.,  by  George  S.  Truman,  and  presented  by  him  to  Swarth- 
more  College,  Pennsylvania. 

aANOIDEI. 
PYCNODUS. 

This  genus,  typical  of  an  extinct  family  of  fishes,  was  originally  indicated 
by  Agassiz  in  the  Poissons  Fossiles.  Many  species  have  been  described, 
mainly  from  teeth  and  fragments  of  jaws  with  teeth,  which  are  comparatively 
large  and  stout,  and  were  adapted  to  crushing  hard  food,  such  as  mollusks 
with  their  shells,  crustaceans,  &c.  The  remains  have  been  found  in  the  Tri- 
assic,  Jurassic,  Cretaceous,  and  early  Tertiary  formations  of  Europe. 

Pycnodus  faba. 

A  specimen,  represented  in  Fig.  16,  Plate  XIX,  indicates  a  species  to 
which  the  above  name  has  been  given.  It  was  submitted  to  my  examination 
by  Dr.  William  Spillman,  who  obtained  it  from  the  Cretaceous  formation  near 
Columbus,  Mississippi.  '  . 


293 

The  specimen  consists  of  a  fragment  of  the  ramus  of  a  U)\ver  jaw  con- 
taining a  numl)er  of  teeth.  Four  principal  teeth  and  part  of  the  attachment 
of  another  are  retaineil  in  the  fragment.  These  teetli  are  ranged  oblicpiely 
parallel  with  one  another  from  within  backward  and  outward.  In  outline 
they  are  elongated-bean  shaped,  being  slightly  concave  in  front  and  convex 
behind,  and  slightly  wider  externally  than  internally.  The  first  of  the  series 
is  7i  lines  wide  by  2|  lines  fore  and  aft,  and  they  successively  increase  in 
breadth  to  the  last,  which  measures  8|  lines  wide  by  2j|-  lines  fore  and  aft. 

At  the  bottom  of  the  slope,  to  the  inner  side  of  the  large  teeth,  there  is  a 
row  of  three  smaller  teeth  and  the  traces  of  attachment  of  a  fourth  one. 
The  three  teeth,  like  the  others,  successively  increase  in  size  from  before 
backward.  They  are  ovoid,  and  situated  obliquely  nearly  opposite  the  inter- 
vals of  the  large  teeth.  The  first  of  the  series  is  2J  lines  in  diameter  fore 
and  aft  and  IJ  lines  transversely;  the  last  one  is  3 J  fines  by  2  fines. 

The  jaw-bone  internal  to  the  teeth  just  described  rises  in  a  ri<lge  toward 
the  symphysis.  The  slope  at  the  fore  part  of  the  ridge  exhibits  the  attach- 
ments of  two  minute  teeth,  indicating  a  second  row  internal  to  the  largest 
teeth. 

To  the  outer  side  of  the  latter  the  specimen  retains  evidences  of  two  rows 
of  smaUer  teeth.  Of  these,  the  first  row  shows  remains  of  seven  teeth  in 
the  length  of  space  occupied  by  the  five  principal  teeth,  and,  like  these,  they 
successively  increased  in  size.  Only  the  fourth  tooth  of  tln^  row  is  preserved, 
and  this  is  transversely  ovoid,  with  tlie  long  diameter  2  lines  wide  and  the 
short  diameter  If  lines. 

Fig.  15,  of  the  same  plate,  represents  a  specimen  apparently  from  the  same 
species,  belonging  to  tlie  Museum  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of 
Philadelphia.  It  was  presented  by  Dr.  J.  H.  Slack,  who  obtained  it  from  the 
green  sand  marl  of  Crosswicks,  Burlington  County,  New  Jersey.  It  consists 
of  a  small  jaw-fragment  containing  three  broad  teeth  simihir  to  the  largest 
ones  above  described. 

An  isolated  tooth  from  New  Jersey,  submitted  to  my  inspection  by 
Professor  G.  H.  Cook,  is  noticed  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy  of 
Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia  for  1857,  p.  1G8,  under  the  name  of 
Pycnodus  rohustus.  The  specimen  represented  in  Figs.  18,  19,  Plate 
XXXVII,  has  the  same  shape  as  in  the  largest  teeth  of  those  referred  to 
P.  faba,  but  is  mucli  larger.  Its  long  diameter  is  14^  lines,  and  its  short 
diameter  nearly  4  lines. 


294 

A  similar  tooth,  nearly  the  same  size  but  slightly  more  sigmoid,  is  repre- 
sented in  Fig.  96,  page  244,  of  Professor  Emmons's  Report  of  the  North 
Carolina  Geological  Survey,  published  in  1858.  Tiie  specimen  is  attributed 
to  the  Miocene  Tertiary,  and  is  referred  to  a  species  with  the  name  of 
Pycnodus  caroHnensis. 

HADRODUS. 
Hadrodus  priscus. 

The  genus  above  named  is  obscure  in  its  relations,  and  was  originally 
described  in  1857,  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
of  Philadelj)hia.  It  was  founded  on  a  specimen  consisting  of  a  bone  with 
two  singular-looking  teeth,  discovered  by  Dr.  William  Spilhnan,  in  the  Cre- 
taceous formation  in  the  vicinity  of  Columbus,  Mississippi. 

The  specimen  represented  in  Figs.  17  to  20,  Plate  XIX,  I  have  supposed 
to  be  a  jiremaxillary  bone  of  an  animal  allied  to  the  extinct  genus  Placodus, 
■formerly  considered   to  be  a  pycnodont  tish,  but  now  determined  to  be  a 
sanropterygian  reptile, 

The  bone  is  nnsymmetrical,  and  sujiports  two  strongly  co-ossified  teeth. 
Whether  the  specimen  is  complete  in  itself  or  whether  it  is  part  of  a  larger 
bone,  I  have  not  been  able  to  ascertain. 

The  bone  is  quadrate  in  outline;  thicker  and  longer  on  one  side,  and 
oblique  at  the  upper  border.  The  anterior  surface  is  convex  and  compara- 
tively smooth.  On  each  side  and  extending  posteriorly,  the  bone  is  deeply 
excavated  into  large  reserve  cavities  for  successional  teeth.  The  back  surface 
between  the  cavities  inclines  from  each  side,  forming  a  median  angular  groove 
descending  to  the  interval  of  the  teeth.  The  bone  is  more  porous  and  striated 
posteriorly  than  anteriorly. 

The  teeth  remind  one  of  the  premolars  of  some  pachyderm,  rather  thau 
the  teeth  of  a  fish  or  reptile.  They  are  not  exactly  alike,  and  are  co-ossitied 
with  the  bone  by  a  firm  osseous  base  or  root,  striated  in  front.  They  are 
quadrate  in  outline,  with  the  breadth  and  height  nearly  the  same,  and  the 
thickness  about  half.  The  crown  is  convex  in  front  and  at  \he  sides,  and  is 
bilobed  at  the  triturating  border,  which  slopes  off  posteriorly.  An  acute 
ridge  and  the  conical  blunted  summits  of  the  lobes  define  the  outer  from  the 
inner  surface.  Smooth  enameloid  substance  invests  the  crown,  extending" 
twice  the  depth  on  the  outer  surface  that  it  does  on  the  inner  suritice.  In 
transverse  section  the  teeth  are  ovoid. 


295 
The  measuremenfs  of  llic  fossil  are  as  follows: 

Lines. 

Depth  of  bone 18-20 

Breadth  of  the  bone 17 

Length  of  the  larger  tooth 8 

Width  of  same 8 

Thickness  of  same 5^ 

Depth  of  enamel Cf 

Length  of  smaller  tooth 7f 

Width  of  same 7J 

Thickness  of  same 4+ 

Depth  of  enamel 0;^ 

I  have  arranged  Hadrodiis  with  the  Pycnodonts,  though,  like  Placodus,  the 
discovery  of  additional  material  may  prove  it  to  be  a  sauropterygian  reptile. 
Of  Placodus,  Professor  Owen  remarks  that  the  "teeth  are  implanted  by 
short  simple  bases  in  distinct  hollow  sockets,"  (Palaeontology,  218;)  and  IMeyer 
says,  "In  wircklichen  Alveolen  stecken  eigentlichen  nur  die  Schneidezixhne 
mit  gut  ausgebildeten  Wurzeln,  der  Wurzeltheil  der  iibrigen  Zahne  ist  mehr 
rait  dem  Knochen,  dem  die  Zahne  angehoren,  verbunden.''  Hadrodus  in 
the  relation  of  the  teeth  would  appear  to  be  different,  as  they  are  firmly 
co-ossified  by  short  bases  with  the  border  of  the  jaw.  They  exhibit  no 
trace  of  implantation  by  sockets,  though  the  successional  teeth  before  being 
established  in  a  fixed  manner  in  functional  position  must  appear  at  least  to 
spring  from  sockets. 

BLASMOBRANCHII. 

Order  Plagiostomi. 

PTYCHODUS. 

Ptychodus  Mortoni. 

The  extinct  genus  of  cestraciont  fishes  above  named  was  inferred  by 
Agassiz,  from  isolated  teeth,  the  only  parts  yet  found  which  can  l)c  A\itii  any 
certainty  referred  to  the  same  animal.  A  number  of  species  have  been  indi- 
cated, mostly  by  the  same  authority,  from  specimens  ibund  in  the  Cretaceous 
formations  of  Europe  and  America. 

Teeth  of  Ptychodus  Mortoni  have  been  discovered  in  the  Cretaceous  de- 
posits of  Alabama,  Mississippi,  and  Kansas,  but  I  have  seen  none  fi'rim  the 
corresponding  formation  of  New  Jersey  or  elsewhere. 

The  Smithsonian  Institution  has  submitted  to  my  examination  a  collection 


■296 


of  fouiteeii  specimens  of  toctli  obtained  by  Dr.  George  M.  Sternberg,  United 
States  Army,  from  the  banks  of  Chalk  Bluff  Creek,  a  branch  of  Smoky  Hill 
River,  about  sixty  miles  east  of  Fort  Wallace,  Kansas.  The  specimens  were 
found  in  two  parcels,  each  together,  as  if  pertaiuiug  to  two  individuals. 

The  two  largest  teeth,  of  which  one  is  represented  in  Figs.  1,  2,  Plate 
XVIII,  are  probably  from  a  median  position  in  the  mouth  or  jaws.  They 
are  symmetrical  in  form,  and  in  outline  arc  transversely  quadrate  oblong  with 
rounded  angles. 

The  ci"ovvn  is  prominently  convex,  with  the  front  and  lateral  borders  nearly 
straight,  the  back  border  slightly  concave,  and  the  angles  rounded.  Poste- 
riorly it  is  impressed  with  a  moderately  concave  crescentoid  sinus.  The 
summit  is  crossed  l)y  a  short  transverse  ridge,  from  which  numerous  ridges 
radiate.  Descending  on  the  sides  of  the  crown  the  ridges  branch,  and  about 
half  way  down  terminate  in  a  fine  reticulation  which  extends  to  the  borders 
of  the  tooth.  The  root  is  a  quadrate  plate  with  the  same  outline  of  form  as 
the  border  of  the  crown. 

Three  other  specimens  of  the  same  parcel  as  the  preceding  appear  to 
have  been  lateral  teeth  in  relation  to  them  in  position  in  the  mouth.  They 
are  nearly  alike  in  shape  and  size ;  one  of  them  -being  represented  in  Figs. 
3,  4.  They  are  not  symmetrical  as  in  the  larger  teeth,  and  their  onthne 
is  more  reniform.  They  are  proportionately  narrower  at  one  side,  and  wider 
and  more  extended  on  a  base  beyond  the  conical  elevation  of  the  crown  at 
the  other  side.  The  sinus  is  of  less  height,  and  the  ridges  of  the  crown 
are  more  convergent  at  the  apex  of  the  cone.  The  root  appears  to  recede 
from  the  narrower  side  and  reaches  nearly  to  the  edge  of  the  crown  on  the 
opposite  side.  The  remaining  two  teeth  of  the  same  parcel  have  the  same 
character  as  those  just  described,  but  are  considerably  smaller. 

Measurements  of  some  of  the  specimens  are  as  follows : 


Breadth  transversely 

Breadth  antero-posteriorly  . 
Height  from  bottom  of  root 


rig8.1,2. 

Figs.  3,  4. 

Lines. 

XijiM. 

Lines, 

Lines, 

22 

20 

m 

17 

V2i 

12J 

9 

9 

12J 

12 

8 

9 

Lines. 

1.3 


Of  the  two  largest  teeth,  of  the  second  parcel,  which  are  nearly  alike,  one 
is  represented  in  Figs.  5  and  G.     They  are  intermediate  in  character  to  those 


297  • 

previously  described,  being  less  symmetrical  than  the  large  teeth  and  more 
so  than  the  smaller  ones,  and  their  crown  is  proportionately  more  prominent 
than  in  any  of  them.  Of  three  teeth  smaller  than  the  former  and  succes- 
sively diminishing,  that  of  intermediate  size  is  represented  in  Figs.  7  and  8. 
They  have  the  same  form  as  the  unsymmetrical  ones  of  the  first  parcel,  but 
have  their  crown  proportionately  much  more  prominent. 

The  remaining  two  teeth  are  different  in  shape  from  the  former.  The 
larger  one  has  tlie  crown  proportionately  less  prominent,  with  the  central 
conical  elevation  less  strongly  radTate.  The  iimer  side  of  the  base  forms  an 
obtuse  angle,  and  is  strongly  impressed  toward  the  back  border.  The  front 
border  of  the  base  of  the  crown  is  short,  nearly  straight,  and  forms  with  the 
oblique  outer  border  an  obtuse  angle. 

The  smaller  tooth  is  represented  in  Figs.  9  and  10,  and  has  nearly  the  same 
shape  as  the  former,  but  the  crown  appears  comparatively  flat  with  a  central 
nipple-like  eminence,  and  the  anterior  and  outer  borders  are  more  continuous. 

The  measui'ements  of  the  teeth  are  as  follows :  . 


Figs. 
5,6. 

Figs. 

7,8. 

Figs. 
9,10. 

Breadth  of  crown  transversely 

Breadth  of  crown  antero-posteriorly . . 
Height  of  crown  from  bottom  of  root. . 

Lines. 

7 

Lines. 

14 

8 

n 

Lines. 

6 

8 

Lines. 

^ 

5 
G 

Lines. 

7 
4 
4 

Linos. 

10 
G 
5J 

Lines. 
7 

U 
3i 

Several  specimens  of  teeth  of  Plychodus  Moitoni  have  been  submitted  to 
my  inspection  by  Dr.  William  Spillinan,  who  obtained  them  from  the  Creta- 
ceous formation  near  Columbus,  Mississippi.  One  of  the  teeth,  of  large  size, 
and  considerably  worn  at  the  summit  of  the  crown,  is  represented  in  Figs. 
11  and  12.  It  is  symmetrical  in  shape,  but  has  a  more  reniforni  ontline  than 
the  large  teeth  from  Kansas.  The  anterior  and  lateral  borders  of  the  crown 
nearly  form  a  semicircle,  and  the  posterior  border  is  deeply  emarginate. 
The  sinus  is  deeper  than  in  the  Kansas  specimens,  but  the  arrangement  of 
the  striations  of  the  crown  appear  to  be  the  same. 

Two  other  specimens,  about  half  the  size  of  the  preceding,  have  nearly  the 
same  shape,  but  have  their  crown  proportionately  more  convex  at  the  fore 
part  of  the  base. 
38  G 


298 


The  measurements  of  the  Mississippi  specimens  are  as 

follows . 

Figs.  11,  1-2. 

Lines. 
20 
10 
9J* 

lAnes. 
12 
6| 

Lines. 

103 

Brofidth  of  cro VTTi  foro  mid  aft 

7 

7 

*  To  wora  summit. 

The  Museum  of  the  Academy  of  Natural* Sciences  of  Philadelphia  contains 
nine  specimens  of  teeth  of  Ptychodus  Mortoni  from  the  Cretaceous  formation 
of  Alabama.  These  in  general  resemble  the  symmetrical  and  unsymmetrical 
teeth  above  described.  One  of  the  specimens  from  Green  County,  Alabama, 
is  represented  in  Figs.  13,  14.  Its  sinus  is  more  sharply  triangular  than  in 
the  previous  specimens. 

Another  tooth,  approaching  in  size  the  largest  Kansas  specimens,  has  a 
more  distinct  conical  ridge  on  the  summit  of  the  crown  from  which  the  other 
I'idges  radiate.  A  third  tooth  nearly  resembles  the  Kansas  specimen  repre- 
sented in  Figs.  3,  4,  and  has  the  summit  of  the  crown  worn  away,  as  in  the 
large  Mississippi  specimen,  represented  in  Figs.  11,  12. 

Measurements  of  .Alabama  specimens  of  teeth  areas  follows: 


Figs.  1.3,  14. 


Breadtli  of  crowu  transversely 

Breadth  of  crown  fore  ami  aft 

Height  of  crown  from  bottom  of  root. . 


Lines. 
16 
lOi 
10^ 


Lines. 

14* 
9 


Lines. 

16 

9 


Lines. 
13 

7 


Lines. 
9 


Ptychodus  occidentalis. 

A  peculiar  species,  to  which  the  above  name  has  been  given,  is  indicated 
by  specimens  of  teeth  discovered  by  Dr.  John  L.  Leconte  in  an  ash-colored 
chalk  of  the  Cretaceous  formation  a  few  miles  east  of  Fort  Hays,  Kansas. 

The  most  characteristic,  and  at  the  same  time  the  largest  specimen,  is 
represented  in  Figs.  7,  8,  Plate  XVII,  of  the  natural  size. 

The  shape  of  the  tooth  and  the  arrangement  of  the  ridges  of  the  crown 
are  quite  different  from  what  they  are  in  the  preceding  species.  The  tooth 
is  symmetrical,  as  in  the  largest  teeth  o?  Ptychodus  Mortoni.,  but  it  is  propor- 
tionately of  less  brt'adtli  transversely,  and  also  higher. 


299 

The  crown  Ibniis  a  promiueiit  cone  with  evenly  sloping  sides,  and  with  a 
t rails versel_y  oblong  square  base  narrowing  a  little  posteriorly.  The  posterior 
sinus  t)t  the  crown  comports  in  its  height  and  breadth  with  the  proportions 
of  the  Ibrmer.  The  principal  ridges  of  the  surface  of  the  crown  cross  the 
summit  and  posterior  slope  transversely.  Descending,  they  branch  in  a 
divergent  manner  and  anastomose,  so  as  to  form  a  comparatively  coarse  retic- 
ulation, extending  to  the  borders  of  the  crown.  The  reticulation  covers  the 
anterior  slope  of  the  crown  and  the  sinus  posteriorly.  The  direction  and 
arrangement  of  the  ridges  resemble  those  in  the  European  Ptychodus  decur- 
rens,  but  in  this  the  principal  ridges  are  much  coarser  and  more  widely 
separated.  The  root  is  mutilated  in  the  specimen.  The  transverse  diam- 
eter of  the  crown  is  14  lines  ;  its  fore  and  aft  diameter  and  its  height  about 
1  inch. 

Figs.  15,  16,  Plate  XVIII,  represent  two  views  of  a  small  tooth,  wh.ich 
may  probably  belong  to  the  same  species.  It  is  unsymmetrical,  and  is  worn 
away  at  the  summit  of  the  crown.  The  latter  is  proportionately  less  promi- 
nent than  in  the  large  tooth,  but  has  its  ridges  arranged  in  the  same  general 
manner.  The  root  is  very  thick  in  comparison  with  the  size  of  the  tooth. 
The  transverse  diameter  of  the  crown  is  7i  lines ;  the  fore  and  aft  diameter 
J  inch. 

Of  five  remaining  specimens,  one  is  a  smaller  and  unworn  tooth  nearly 
like  that  last  described.  Its  crown  is  5  lines  wide  and  4  lines  from  before 
backward. 

The  specimen  represented  in  Fig.  17  is  more  symmetrical,  and  nearly 
resembles  in  shape  the  smaller  symmetrical  teeth  of  Ptychodus  Mortoni,  as 
represented  in  Figs.  13,  14.  The  apex  of  the  crown  is  not  so  pointed,  but  is 
prolonged  fore  and  aft  in  an  acute  ridge,  and  the  rugae  of  the  surface  are  not 
convergent,  but  cross  the  summit  in  the  usual  transverse  manner  of  the  otiier 
teeth.  The  breadth  of  the  crown  in  this  specimen  is  4|  fines ;  the  antero- 
posterior diameter  3f  lines. 

The  remaining  teeth,  of  which  the  largest  is  represented  in  Fig.  18,  have 
a  transversely  ovoidal  crown  slightly  elevated  to  one  side  of  the  center.  The 
surface  is  crossed  by  rugae  in  the  same  manner  as  in  tlie  large  tepth. 


300 


The  ineasiirciiioiils  ol'tln^  three  spi'oimeus  aro 

a^  i" 

)ll()ws : 

■ 

Liues. 

Liues. 

Liues. 

Transverse  diameter  of  the  crown .     . 

14 

o 

Antero-posterior  diameter  of  the  crowu 

IJ 

Ptychodus  Whippleyi. 

Marcon,  in  his  Geology  of  North  America,  describes  and  figures  a  tooth 
from  the  Cretaceous  formation  near  Galisteo,  New  Mexico,  and  refers  it  to  a 
peculiar  species  under  the  above  name. 

A  similar  tooth  submitted  to  my  inspection  by  Dr.  Benjamin  F.  Slnimard, 
from  the  Cretaceous  rocks  of  Texas,  is  represented  in  Figs.  19,  20,  Plate 
XVIII.  It  is  remarkable  for  the  abrupt  nipple-like  prolongation  of  the 
crown. 

The  tooth  is  unsymmetrical,  and  probably  held  a  lateral  position  in  the 
series.  The  base  of  the  crown  is  quadrate,  witli  the  fore  and  outer  borders 
forming  a  single  curve,  while  the  other  borders  form  a  nearly  right  angle. 
The  nipple-like  eminence  of  the  crown  inclines,  as  I  suppose,  outwardly. 
The  posterior  sinus  is  shallow.  The  rugae  of  the  surface  of  the  crown  cross 
the  summit  transversely  and  diverge  and  branch  descending  upon  the  sides  of 
the  cone.  They  are  comparatively  feeble,  but  this  condition  may  be  partially 
due  to  friction.  The  surface  of  the  base  of  the  crown  appears  rather  nodu- 
lated  than  reticulated. 

The  breadth  of  the  tooth  at  the  base  of  the  crown  is  7  lines  transversely 
and  fore  and  aft ;  its  height  from  the  bottom  of  the  root  8  lines. 

The  tooth  resembles  that  of  Ptychodus  altior  of  Agassiz,  from  the  chalk  of 
Sussex,  England,  as  represented  in  Fig.  10,  Plate  XXX,  of  Dixon's  Geology 
of  Sussex. 

ACRODUS. 

This  extinct  genus  of  cestraciont  sharks,  first  described  by  Agassiz,  was 
represented  in  Europe  l)y  many  species  whose  remains  occur  in  the  various 
formations  from  the  Permian  to  the  Cretaceous  inclusive. 


ACEODUS   HUMILIS. 

A  specicss  to  which  this  name  has  l)een   given  is  indicated  by  an  isolated 


301 

tuoth  represented  in. Fig.  5,  Plate  XXXVII,  magnifieil  1^-  diameters.  The 
specimen  was  obtained  from  the  yellow  limestone  of  the  Cretaceous  series, 
near  Vincentown,  Burlington  County,  New  Jersey,  and  it  belongs  to  the 
Museum  of  the  Academy.  The  erown  of  the  tooth  is  7^  lines  by  2J  lines. 
The  extremities  arc  angular;  the  sides  nearly  straight  or  in  the  feeblest 
degree  sigmoid.  The  upper  surface  is  convex;  and  its  median  ridge  is  almost 
obsolete.  The  secondary  ridges,  proceeding  transversely  from  the  former, 
become  branched  and  finely  reticulated  at  the  boundaries  of  the  crown. 
The  groove  on  the  inner  side  of  the  latter,  for  co-adaptaticni  to  the  contig- 
uous tooth,  is  about  three-fourths  of  a  line  in  width.  The  fang  or  con- 
tracted base  of  the  tooth  is  about  half  the  breadth  of  the  crown. 

Professor  Emmons  has  represented  the  tooth  of  an  Acrodus  in  Fig.  97  of 
his  Report  of  the  North  Carohna  Geological  Survey  for  1858,  which  he  attrib- 
utes to  the  Miocene  Tertiary.  If  it  really  pertains  to  this  formation,  it  indi- 
cates the  latest  known  species  of  the  genus.  The  species  has  been  named 
Acrodus  Emmonsi 

GALEOCERDO. 

Galeoceedo   falcatus. 

The  teeth  of  Galeocerdo  are  nearly  as  broad  as  they  arc  long,  and  the  root 
is  but  moderately  notched.  The  anterior  border  of  the  crown  is  strongly 
arched  and  oblique ;  the  posterior  border  is  shglitly  curved  and  nearly  verti- 
cal, but  is  abruptly  prolonged  backward  at  its  base.  The  border's  of  the 
crown  are  serrated ;  the  point  is  somewhat  acuminate. 

Teeth  frgm  the  chalk  formations  of  Europe  figured  in  the  "  Poissons  Fos- 
siles,"  and  ascribed  by  its  illustrious  author  to  half  a  dozen  different  species, 
are,  with  reason,  by  Reuss  referred  to  a  single  one  with  the  name  of  Corax 
heterodon.  As  Agassiz,  according  to  Gibbes,  does  not  now  consider  Corax 
different  from  Galeocerdo,  I  have  used  this  name,  together  with  the  earlier 
specific  one  of  falcatus,  to  represent  the  Corax  heterodon  of  Reuss. 

Many  specimens  of  well-preserved  teeth,  submitted  to  my  examination, 
from  various  locaUties  of  the  American  Cretaceous  formation,  appear  to  belong 
to  Galeocerdo  falcatus.  The  variations  in  the  form  and  size  of  different  teeth 
I  think  are  sufficiently  accounted  for  from  the  difference  of  position  the  teeth 
occupied  in  the  jaws  and  upon  difference  in  age. 

Figs.  29  to  31,  Plate  XVIII,  represent  three  of  these  teeth,  obtained  with 


302 

others  by  Dr.  George  M.  Sternberg,  United  States  Army,  from  the  vicinity 
of  Camp  Supply,  on  the  North  Canadian  River,  Indian  Territory,  probably 
from  a  formation  of  Cretaceous  age. 

Their  apparent  specific  identity  with  the  teeth  of  Galeocerdo  falcatus  of 
Europe  is  seen  by  comparing  the  figures  with  Fig.  43,  taken  from  a  tooth 
imbedded  in  a  block  of  chalk  from  Sussex,  England. 

Figs.  32  to  36  represent  a  series  of  similar  teeth  obtained,  with  many  others 
of  the  same  character,  by  Dr.  William  Spillman,  from  near  Columbus,  Mis- 
sissippi. 

Figs.  37  to  40  represent  smaller  teeth,  which  I  suspect  to  belong  to  the 
same  species,  found  by  Dr.  John  L.  Leconte,  about  three  miles  east  of  Fort 
Hays,  Kansas.  Similar  specimens  were  also  obtained  by  Dr.  Hayden,  in 
bed  No.  2  of  the  Cretaceous  rocks,  near  the  mouth  of  Vermilion  River, 
Kansas. 

Figs.  41,  42  represent  small  teeth,  likewise  of  the  same  species,  obtained 
by  Dr.  Shumard  from  the  Cretaceous  Ibrmation  of  Texas. 

OXYRHINA. 

The  teeth  of  Oxyrhina  have  a  simple,  compressed  demiconical  crown,  with 
sharp  borders,  and  without  lateral  denticles. 

OXYEHINA    EXTENTA. 

Figs.  21  to  23,  Plate  XVIII,  represent  specimens  of  teeth  of  an  Oxyrhina 
discovered  by  Dr.  George  M.  Sternberg,  United  States  Army,  in  the  vicinity 
of  Camp  Supply,  on  the  North  Canadian  River,  Indian  Territory.  Figs.  24, 
25  represent  similar  teeth  found  by  Dr.  William  Spillman  in  the  Cretaceous 
formation  near  Columbus,  Mississippi.  These  teeth  differ  especially,  from 
those  of  other  species  previously  described  and  figured,  in  the  greater  pro- 
portionate extension  laterally  of  the  base  of  the  ci-own.  They  most  nearly 
resemble  the  teeth  of  the  Oxyrhina  Mantelli  of  the  chalk  of  Europe. 

In  the  Museum  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia  there 
is  a  specimen  of  an  Oxyrhina  tooth  in  a  block  of  chalk  from  Sussex  County, 
England,  resembling  those  just  described  in  the  unusual  extension  laterally 
of  the  crown.  If  this  specimen  pertained  to  O.  ManteMi,  it  is  probable  that 
the  specimens  from  Mississippi  and  the  Indian  Territory  do  likewise.  It 
was  not  until  after  I  had  described  the  latter  under  the  above  name  that  I 


303 


noticed  the  specimen  from  the  English  chalk.  My  comparisons  had  been 
made  with  the  figures  of  Agassiz,  Dixon,  and  Reuss,  and  in  none  of"  these  do 
the  teeth  exhibit  so  conspicuous  a  lateral  extension  of  the  base  of  the  crown 
as  in  the  American  specimens  and  the  English  chalk  specimen  of  our  Museum. 
An  exception  to  this  statement  may  be  made  in  reference  to  Fig.  26,  Plate 
XXX,  in  Dixon's  Geology  of  Sussex,  representing  a  tooth,  which  is  rcferi-ed 
to  Lamna  acuminata. 

Measurements  of  the  specimens  referred  to  Oxyrhina  extenta  are  as  follows: 


Specimens  represented  in  Pljite  XVIII. 


Vis..  21. 


FiK.  2-i. 


Fiff.  23. 


Fig.  24. 


Fiff.  25. 


Lines. 


Length  from  notch  of  root . 
Length  of  crown  at  middle 
Breadth  of  crown  at  base  . 

Breadth  of  root 

Thickness  of  root 


9 

12 

5 


IJncs. 
12 

8- 
15 
17 

4.^ 


Lines. 

12 
13 
4i 


Lines. 

14 
12 

18 


Lines. 
10 

13 
14 

4 


LAMNA  s.  OXYRHINA. 

The  teeth  of  Lamna  are  in  general .  characterized  by  the  long,  narrow 
crown,  with  a  single  denticle  on  each  side  of  the  base,  and  a  strong  root  with 
narrow  branches  separated  by  a  deep  notch  Those  of  Oxyrhina  usually 
have  a  broader  crown  without  lateral  denticles,  and  also  have  a  broader  root 
with  a  shallower  notch.  In  both  genera,  however,  the  proportion  of  breadth 
to  length,  and  most  other  characters,  except  the  presence  or  absence  of  the 
lateral  denticles,  vary  in  different  parts  of  the  jaws.  In  both,  the  side  teeth 
are  wider  than  those  in  advance,  the  disproportion  usually  being  greater  in 
Oxyrhina  than  in  Lamna.  Some  of  the  teeth  in  the  two  genera  so  nearly 
assume  the  form  of  one  another,  that  when  isolated  fossil  teeth  of  either  are 
•found  without  the  base  it  is  sometimes  difficult  to  know  to  which  to  refer 
them. 

A  number  of  times  I  have  seen  specimens  of  teeth,  reputed  to  have  been 
derived  from  the  Cretaceous  formation,  which  so  closely  resemble  those  of 
certain  Tertiary  species  of  Lamna,  except  in  the  possession  of  lateral  denti- 
cles, that  I  have  suspiciously  regarded-them  as  pertaining  to  the  same.  The 
absence  of  denticles  I  tlionght  might  be  accidental  or  abnormal.  The  report 
that  the  teeth  had  been  found  in  a  Cretaceous  formation  I  suspected  might 


304 

be  a  mistake ;  or,  if  they  had,  that  they  were,  perhaps,  accidental  in  their 
occurrence  in  that  formation,  and  had  probably  been  derived  from  some  con- 
tiguous Eocene  deposit.  The  frequent  repetition  of  the  same  thing  has  led 
me  to  view  the  specimens  as  having  really  pertained  to  Cretaceous  fishes. 
The  absence  of  the  lateral  denticles  would  refer  the  teeth  to  the  genus  Oxy- 
rhina,  and  the  general  form  and  other  characters  rather  to  the  genus  Lamua. 
May  the  teeth  not  be  regarded  as  having  belonged  to  Oxyrhina  ancestors  of 
some  of  the  later  Lamnse  1 
,.Fig.  44,  Plate  XVIII,  represents  a  tooth  which  lies  iml^edded  in  a  portion 
of  gray  rock,  obtained  by  Dr.  John  L.  Leconte  from  the  Cretaceous  forma- 
tion three  miles  east  of  Fort  Hays,  Kansas.  The  specimen  is  perfect  and 
unabraded.  In  all  respects  it  is  like  the  teeth  of  Lamna  cuspidata  of  the 
early  Tertiary  deposits,  except  that  it  is  devoid  of  lateral  denticles,  and  pre- 
sents no  trace  of  ever  having  possessed  them. 

Fig.  45  represents  a  tooth,  which  lies  in  a  block  of  chalk,  from  Sussex, 
England.  The  siiecimen  is  preserved  in  the  Museum  of  the  Academy  of 
Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia.  Like  the  former,  it  closely  resembles  the 
teeth  of  L.  cuspidata,  but  exhibits  no  trace  of  lateral  denticles. 

Figs.  46,  47  represent  two  teeth  which  the  writer  found  with  the  skeleton 
of  Hadrosaunis  Foulkii  and  shells  of  Exogyra  costata,  Ammonites  placenta, 
&c.,  in  clay  near  Haddonfield,  Camden  County,  New  Jersey.  These  speci- 
mens, unworn  and  perfect,  except  in  positions  having  no  relation  with  the 
point  in  question,  are  identical  in  character  with  the  teeth  of  Lamna  elegans 
of  the  early  Tertiary  deposits,  except  that  they  exhibit  no  trace  whatever  of 
the  existence  of  lateral  denticles. 

Figs.  48,  49  represent  two  teeth  selected  from  eight  specimens  obtained 
by  Dr.  AVilliam  Spillman  from  the  Cretaceous  formation  near  Columbus,  Mis- 
sissippi. Most  of  the  specimens  are  complete  and  well  preserved,  and  in  no 
instance  exhibit  traces  of  lateral  denticles,  while  in  all  other  respects  they  are 
like  the  teeth  of  L.  elegans. 

Seven  specimens  of  teeth  from  the  Cretaceous  formation  of  Green  County, 
Alabama,  presented  to  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia  by 
Dr.  Joseph  Jones,  also  agree  with  those  of  L.  elegans,  except  that  they  have 
no  lateral  denticles. 

In  a  collection  of  similar  teeth,  presented  to  the  Academy  by  "William  M. 
Gabb,  in  all  the  specimens  retaining  the  root,  twenty  in  number,  the  lateral 


305 

denticles  are  absent.  Most  of  the  teeth  appear  slightly  water-worn,  but  the 
best  of  them  exhibit  no  trace  of  the  lateral  denticles.  These  specimens  were 
obtained  by  Mr.  Gabb  from  the  Cretaceous  green  sand  of  Mullica  Hill,  Glou- 
cester County,  New  Jersey. 

Fig.  50  represents  a  tooth  which  lies  partially  imbedded  in  a  fragment  of 
gray  sandstone,  obtained  by  Professor  Hayden  from  the  Cretaceous  deposit, 
indicated  by  him  as  No.  2,  near  the  mouth  of  Vermilion  River,  Kansas.  In 
the  attempt  to  dislodge  the  tooth  from  its  matrix  the  ends  of  the  root  were 
bi'oken  off,  but  it  is  otherwise  complete.  It  also  appears  not  to  have  pos- 
sessed lateral  denticles,  but  otherwise  is  like  the  teeth  of  X.  elegans. 

Roemer  describes  and  figures  a  tooth,  (Kreidebikkmgen  v.  Texas,  page  29, 
Plate  I,  Fig.  7,)  mider  the  name  of  L.  Texana,  from  the  Cretaceous  forma- 
tion of  Texas.  The  figure  represents  wkat  appears  to  be  a  perfect  tooth 
without  lateral  denticles,  and  otherwise  resembles  those  of  L.  elegans. 

Dr.  B.  F.  Shuraard  also  submitted  to  my  inspection  several  teeth  from  the 
Cretaceous  formation  of  Texas  resembling  those  of  L.  elegans,  but  in  these 
the  root  was  broken  off,  excepting  on  one  side  of  one  specimen,  and  in  this 
no  lateral  denticle  existed. 

Notwithstanding  all  that  has  been  stated  above,  I  must  add  that  I  have 
noticed  among  collections  of  teeth  of  L.  elegans  from  Tertiary  formations 
specimens  in  which  the  latei-al  denticles  were  feebly  developed,  and  others  in 
which  they  were  entirely  absent.  In  some  of  the  latter,  traces  of  their  acci- 
dental detachment  were  perceptible,  but  in  others  I  could  see  none. 

It  would  appear,  however,  from  the  facts  thus  given,  that  during  the  Cre- 
taceous period  there  existed  two  species  of  sharks  in  which  the  teeth  resem- 
bled those  of  L.  ciisjndata  and  L.  elegans  of  the  Tertiary  period,  except  that 
the  teeth  possessed  no  lateral  denticles.  The  two  Cretaceous  sharks  were 
probably  the  ancestors  from  which  the  species  just  named  were  evolved. 

OTODUS. 

Otodus  divaricatus. 

Among  a  small  collection  of  fossils  submitted  to  me  for  examination  by  Dr. 
William  Spillman,  of  Columbus,  Mississippi,  there  is  a  specimen  of  a  shark- 
tooth  of  rather  peculiar  character,  which  is  represented  in  Figs.  26  to  28,  of 
Plate  XVIII.     The  specimen  is  labeled   "lime  formation,"  Texas,  and  noth- 
39  G 


306 

ing  is  further  known  in  relation  to  its  locality,  but  I  suspect  it  to  be  of  Cre- 
taceous age.  Of  known  species,  it  bears  most  resemblance  to  the  teeth  of 
Otodus  semiplicatus,  Ag.,  of  the  chalk  of  Europe.  It  also  has  some  likeness 
with  a  tooth  from  the  chalk  of  France,  represented  in  Fig.  11,  Plate  LXXVI, 
of  Grervais's  Paleontologie  Franqaise. 

The  crown  forms  a  narrow  demicone,  with  an  expanded  base  supporting  a 
pair  of  inwardly-diverging  denticles.  The  surface  of  the  principal  cone  near 
the  base  is  plicated.  The  root  is  thick  and  deeply  notched,  and  extends  pos- 
teriorly more  than  half  the  length  of  the  tooth.  The  anterior  surface  of  the 
crown  in  the  median  line  is  as  long  as  the  base  is  wide,  and  is  about  one-fifth 
greater  than  the  posterior  surface. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Length  of  tooth  at  raiddle 16 

Length  from  ends  of  the  root 21 

Breadth  at  ends  of  the  root 15J 

Length  of  crown  iu  front 13 

Length  of  crown  behind 10 

Breadth  of  crown  at  base  12g 

Holocephaii. 

EDAPHODON. 

In  the  extinct  chimseroid  fish  Edaphodon  the  inferior  maxiliarics  are  pro- 
duced anteriorly  in  a  long  beak,  and  the  superior  maxillaries  are  provided 
with  three  large  dental  areas.  In  the  allied  genus  Ischyodus  the  inferior 
maxillaries  are  not  prolonged  in  a  beak,  and  the  upper  ones  are  provided  with 
four  large  dental  areas. 

Edaphodon  mikificus. 

A  species  under  the  above  name  was  indicated  by  the  author  in  the  Pro- 
ceedings of  the  Academy  for  1856,  page  221.  It  was  founded  on  eight  speci- 
mens of  maxillaries  obtained  from  the  Cretaceous  green  sand  of  Burlington 
County,  New  Jersey,  by  Professor  (jeorge  H.  Cook,  during  the  State  geo- 
logical survey. 

The  inferior  maxillaries,  represented  in  Figs.  6  to  9,  Plate  XXXVII,  are 
about  twice  the  length  of  the  depth.  The  two  rami  converge  in  a  curve,  and 
end  together  in  a  long,  bird-like  beak,  (Fig.  6.) 

The  outer  surface  (Fig.  7)  of  each  ramus  is  lozenge-like  in  outline,  defined 


307 

by  a  concave  upper  border,  a  convex  anterior  border,  a  short,  oblique,  poste- 
rior border,  and  a  convex  lower  border.  The  surface  is  concave  longitu- 
dinally, and  is  convex  transversely  in  front  and  behind,  and  concave  in  the 
middle. 

The  inner  surface  (Fig.  8)  is  flat  transversely,  slightly  convex  longitudin- 
ally, and  with  the  fore  and  back  borders  prominent.  It  is  moderately  stri- 
ated in  the  length,  and  at  its  upper  part  presents  a  symphysial  bevel,  extend- 
ing the  length  of  the  beaked  portion  of  the  bone. 

The  oral  surface  (Fig.  6)  on  the  beak  is  concave  fore  and  aft,  and  at  the 
back  half  of  the  bone  forms  a  lozenge-like  plane  sloping  inwardly,  and  having 
the  outer  border  elevated.  The  sloping  plane  exhibits  at  its  fore  part  inter- 
nally a  large  cordiforni  dental  area,  with  the  notch  at  the  base  of  the  beak. 
Externally  to  this  area,  near  the  fore  part  of  the  crest  defining  the  outer  part 
of  the  sloping  plane,  there  is  a  second  much  smaller  elliptical  dental  area. 
These  two  areas  are  separated  by  a  groove,  widening  forward  upon  the  oral 
surface  of  the  beak,  where  it  presents  a  third  dental  area.  This  is  the  third 
in  size,  is  oval  in  form,  and  is  situated  just  in  advance  of  the  outer  part  of  .the 
largest  dental  area. 

A  fourth  area,  smaller  than  the  others,  occupies  the  back  extremity  of  the 
symphysial  bevel  to  the  inner  side  of  the  anterior  part  of  the  largest  dental 
area.  The  dental  column  which  forms  this  fourth  area  produces  the  prom- 
inent ridge  defining  the  inner  surface  of  the  ramus  mandibuli  posteriorly. 

Beside  these  dental  areas,  two  or  three  others  are  observed  at  the  end  of 
the  beak.  One  of  them  curves  from  the  symphysis  outward  and  backward  on 
the  outer  edge  of  the  point  of  the  beak.  Another  smaller  oval  one  is  situated 
at  the  edge  of  the  symphysis  behind  the  commencement  of  the  former.  In 
one  specimen  a  still  smaller  oval  area  is  situated  just  behind  the  outer  end  of 
the  curved  area,  but  in  the  other  specimens  it  appears  not  to  be  distinct  from 
the  latter. 

The  dental  areas  in  the  fossils  appear  as  depressed  and  decomposed, 
friable,  white,  chalky  tracts,  with  harder  calcigerous  tubules  of  the  vaso- 
dentiue  projecting  from  the  surfaces.  The  tubercular  eminences  originally 
occupying  the  position  of  the  areas  and  terminating  the  dental  columns 
have  disappeared,  leaving  depressed  surfaces.  The  vaso-dentiual  columns 
corresponding  with  the  areas  on  the  triturating  surface  are  visible  at  the 
posterior-inferior  extremity  of  the  mandibles,  as  seen  in  Fig.  9. 


308 

The  upper  maxillaries,  represented  in  Figs.  10  to  12,  bear  a  near  resem- 
blance to  those  of  Edaphodon  BucJdandi  and  E.  Icptognathus,  as  represented 
in  Tab.  40  d,  of  the  third  volume  of  the  Atlas  of  Agassiz's  Poissons  Fossiles. 

The  outer  surface  (Fig.  11)  of  each  maxilla  is  a  broad,  sloping  plane,  the 
inner  surface  a  vertical  plane.  The  upper  surface  is  also  flat,  but  is  occupied 
at  its  inner  back  pai't  by  a  wide,  deep  gutter,  ending  forward  in  a  pit. 

The  palatine  surface  (Fig.  10)  of  the  two  bones  conjoined  at  its  back  part 
forms  a  wide,  transverse  concavity,  nearly  flat  in  the  middle,  but  curving 
downward  at  the  outer  part.  The  palatine  surface  inclines  forward  to  the 
anterior  subacute  termination  of  the  bones.  The  lateral  border  of  each  max- 
•illa  at  the  palatine  surface  is  strongly  sigmoid. 

Three  large  dental  tubercles  occupied  the  palatine  surface  of  each  max- 
illa, indicated  in  the  fossils,  as  seen  in  Fig.  10,  by  tliree  depressed  areas  of 
white,  decomposing  vaso-dentiue.  The  largest  area  is  posterior  and  internal. 
It  is  broken  at  its  back  part  in  the  fossils,  but,  in  the  entire  condition,  appears 
to  have  been  reniform  in  outline.  Immediately  in  advance  of  this  area  is 
another  with  an  oblong  cordiform  outline  ;  and  external  to  the  largest  one  is 
the  third  area,  about  as  long  as  this,  but  not  more  than  half  the  breadth,  and 
having  a  clavate  outline. 

The  dental  columns  corresponding  with  the  three  dental  areas  are  seen 
at  the  back  of  the  maxillae,  the  largest  one  below  the  position  of  the  two 
smaller  ones,  as  represented  in  Fig.  12. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimens  are  as  follows : 

Inferior  maxillary. 

Lines. 

Extreme  length  of  bone C4 

Leugth  of  beak  along  the  symphysis 40 

Length  of  anterior  border  of  ramus 44 

Leugth  of  posterior  or  upper  border  bcack  of  the  beak 26 

Width  of  inner  surface 26 

Width  of  upper  surface  back  of  the  beak .*  24 

Width  of  the  large  posterointernal  deutal  area 13* 

Estimated  breadth  fore  and  aft  10 

Width  of  external  dental  area ~ 7 

Estimated  breadth  fore  and  aft , 3 

Diameter  of  anterior  deutal  area  fore  and  aft ., 4 

Diameter  of  same  transversely - 3 

*  The  size  of  tlie  deutal  areas  is  iu  some  measure  uncertain,  as  iu  some  cases  they  appear  to  havo 
been  more  or  less  estomled  in  the  fore  and  aft  diameter  by  fracture  over  the  position  of  the  dental 
columus. 


309 

Superior  maxillary. 

Lines. 

Extreme  length  of  bone 5S 

Length  6T  bone  internally 43 

Bi'eadth  i>osteriorly 23 

Diameter  fore  and  aft  of  large  postero-internal  dental  area 18 

Diameter  of  same  transversely , 12 

Diameter  fore  and  aft  of  anterior  dental  area 11 

Diameter  of  same  posteriorly  and  transversely 5 

Diameter  fore  and  aft  of  external  dental  area 16 

Diameter  transversely  of  the  same  where  widest 5 

EUMYLODUS. 

EuMYLODUS   LAQUEATUS. 

Among  some  fossils  from  the  Cretaceous  sandstone  near  Columbus,  Missis- 
sippi, submitted  to  my  examination  by  Dr.  William  Spillman,  there  is  a  spec- 
imen of  the  maxillo-dentary  apparatus  of  a  chimaeroid  fish,  related  with 
Ischyodus,  but  apparently  distinct  from  that  genus.  The  specimen  is  repre- 
sented in  Figs.  21,  22,  Plate  XIX,  and  Figs.  13,  14,  Plate  XXXVII.  It 
most  resembles,  in  its  general  form,  the  mandible  of  Ischyodus,  as  repre- 
sented in  Fig.  20,  Tab.  40,  of  /.  Townsendi,  and  Fig.  16,  Tab.  40  c,  of  I. 
Agassizi,  of  the  third  volume  of  the  Atlas  of  the  Poissons  Fossiles. 

The  bone  is  of  denser  character  than  the  corresponding  one  of  Edaphodon, 
and  in  this  respect  and  several  others  is  more  like  that  of  Leptomylus,  de- 
scribed by  Professor  Cope. 

The  outer  surface  (Fig.  14,  Plate  XXXVII)  is  nearly  Hat,  but  slightly 
depressed  below,  and  bent  outwardly  behind  from  the  triturating  surface. 
The  inner  surface  (Fig.  21,  Plate  XIX)  is  fluted  ;  the  anterior  third  presents 
a  succession  of  three  curved  ridges  separated  by  two  grooves  ;  the  median 
third  forms  a  wide,  concave  groove  ;  and  the  posterior  third  forms  a  nearly 
square  plane,  sloping  from  the  triturating  surface  backward  and  inward,  and 
defined  by  a  subacute  border  from  the  outer  surface  of  the  bone. 

The  anterior  border  of  the  mandible  appear-s  as  curved  cylindroid  termina- 
tion of  the  bone.     No  appearance  of  a  distinct  symphysial  surface  exists. 

The  oral  surface  (Fig.  22,  Plate  XIX)  is  uneven,  and  conforms  in  its  out- 
line with  "the  inner  and  outer  faces  of  the  bone.  The  anterior  most  promi- 
nent portion  is  convex,  and  exhibits  some  scratches  and  polisli,  due  to  its 
masticating  function.  Its  posterior  two-thirds  incline  from  a  median  dentary 
ridge,  moderately  without  and  behind,  but  steeply  within. 


310 

The  dcntary  ridge  is  near  the  median  line  of  the  oral  surface,  extending 
about  half  its  length,  but  nearer  its  posterior  than  anterior  extremity.  As 
seen  in  Fig.  13,  Plate  XXXVII,  it  appears  to  be  composed  of  the  prominent 
tubercular  extremities  of  three  connate  columns,  of  which  the  back  two 
appear  oval,  and  the  anterior  one  rather  clavate  in  outline. 

The  measurements  of  the  specimen  are  as  follows  : 

Lines. 

Length  or  depth  of  the  anterior  border 32 

Length  or  depth  of  the  posterior  border . '.    11 

Thickness  of  the  anterior  column  or  border 6 

Thickness  at  the  second  ridge  of  the  inner  surface 6^ 

Thickness  at  the  third  ridge  of  the  inner  surface SJ 

Thickness  at  the  middle  concavity  of  the  inner  surface 7^ 

Thickness  at  the  commencing  ridge  of  the  posterior  slope  of  the  inner  surface. . .  10 

F5re  and  aft  extent  of  triturating  surface 36 

Length  of  dental  tract 19 


NOTICE  OF  SOME  REMAINS  OF  FISHES  FROM  THE  CARBONIF- 
EROUS FORMATIONS  OF  KANSAS. 


The  remains  described  below  were  obtained  by  Dr.  F.  V.  Haydeu  and 
Mr.  F.  B.  Meek  in  the  summer  of  1858,  and  were  originally  noticed  by  the 
writer  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadel- 
phia in  January,  1859. 

Plagiostomi. 

CLADODUS. 

Cladodus  occidentalis. 

The  extinct  genus  of  cartilaginous  fishes,  Cladodus,  was  first  characterized 
by  Agassiz  from  isolated  teeth  from  the  Coal-formation  of  Europe.  A 
species  of  the  same  genus  is  indicated  by  a  fragment  of  a  tooth  discovered 
by  Messrs.  Hayden  and  Meek  in  the  upper  Coal-measures  of  Manhattan 
Kansas. 

The  specimen  has  lost  one-half  its  base,  a  large  portion  of  its  principal 
cusp,  and  the  points  of  the  lateral  cusps,  but  sufficient  remains  to  give  us  a 
correct  idea  of  the  form  of  the  perfect  tooth,  as  represented  in  Figs.  4  to  6, 
Plate  XVII. 

The  base  of  the  tooth  is  oblong  in  outline,  with  the  inner  border  some- 
what angular  and  the  outer  one  concave.  Its  upper  inner  surface  slopes  from 
the  cusps,  and  near  its  margin,  a  short  distance  from  the  extremities,  supports 
a  pair  of  oval  tubei'cles.  Similar  protuberances  occupy  a  position  beneath 
the  base  externally. 

The  median  or  principal  cusp  of  the  tooth  is  elongated  demiconical,  with 
acute  lateral  edges.  The  inner  convex  surface  of  the  cusp  at  its  base  exhibits 
sharp,  oblique  folds  or  striae,  as  represented  in  Fig.  4.  The  outer  less  convex 
or  nearly  flat  surface  is  smooth,  except  a  few  vertical  wrinkles  at  its  base. 

The  lateral  denticles  on  each  side  of  the  principal  cusp  are  two,  of  which 
the  outer  is  the  larger. 


312 

In  its  perfect  condition  the  tooth  has  approximated  I4  inches  in  length, 
and  about  1  inch  in  breadth  at  l)ase. 

A  simihar  tooth  from  the  coal-measures  of  Illinois  has  been  described 
under  the  name  of  Cladodus  mortifer  by  Professor  Newberry,  in  the  second 
volume  of  Worthen's  Geological  Survey  of  Illinois,  published  in  18G6.  Mr. 
Orestes  St.  John  has  likewise  described  some  teeth  of  the  same  species  from 
the  coal  measures  of  Nebraska,  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  American  Philo- 
sophical Society  for  1870,  and  in  Hayden's  Report  on  the  Geological  Survey 
of  Nebraska,  published  this  year. 

XYSTRACANTHUS. 

Xystracanthus  arcuatus. 

A  second  cartilaginous  fish  of  the  Coal-period  is  indicated  by  a  remarkable 
dorsal  spine,  discovered  by  Messrs.  Meek  and  Hayden  in  the  Upper  Carbon- 
iferous rocks  of  Leavenworth  City,  Kansas.  The  specimen,  represented  in 
Fig.  25,  Plate  XVII,  lies  partially  imbedded  in  a  piece  of  yellowish  lime- 
stone, also  containing  a  few  minute  crinoid  segments.  The  point  of  the  spine 
and  its  root  of  insertion  are  destroyed,  and  the  specimen  is  otherwise  muti- 
lated and  appears  somewhat  crushed,  but  it  is  sufficiently  characteristic  to 
distinguish  it  from  ichthyodorulites  previously  described. 

The  spine  is  strongly  curved,  appears  flattened  at  the  sides,  and  is  rounded 
at  tlie  borders.  Its  transverse  section  is  narro\V  ovoid,  with  the  narrower 
extremity  toward  the  convex  border.  The  spine  is  longitudinally  striated, 
and  in  its  present  condition  the  bone  is  brown  and  quite  friable.  The  sides 
and  concave  border  of  the  spine  are  furnished  with  white,  shining,  enamel- 
like tubercles  of  various  sizes.  The  smaller  ones  are  half  ovoid ;  larger 
ones  are  conical  or  half  conical ;  and  the  largest,  which  occupy  the  upper  and 
lower  part  of  the  concave  border,  are  crescentoid,  and  embrace  the  latter.  In 
shape  and  attachment  the  larger  tubercles  remind  one  of  minute  polypori 
projecting  from  the  stem  of  a  tree.  They  are  convex  above,  and  flat,  or 
slightly  concave,  below. 

PETALODUS. 
Petalodtjs  alleghaniensis. 

Petalodus  is  another  extinct  genus  of  cartilaginous  fishes,  allied  to  our 
living  sharks,  which  was  originally  characterized  by  Owen,  and  was  also 
established  on  isolated  teeth  from  the  Carboniferous  formations  of  Europe. 


313 

A  species  of  the  same  genus,  under  the  above  uame,  was  described  by  the 
author  in  the  Journal  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  for  1856,  from  a 
specimen  found  in  the  Coal-measures  of  Blair  County,  Pennsylvania.  A  sim- 
ilar tooth  was  also  described  and  referred  to  the  same  species  in  the  Pro- 
ceedings of  the  Academy  for  1859,  which  was  obtained  by  Messrs.  Meek  and 
Haydeu  from  the  Upper  Carboniferous  formation  of  Fort  Riley,  Kansas.  The 
specimen  is  represented  in  Fig.  3,  Plate  XVII. 

The  crown  is  broad,  and  somewhat  lozenge-shaped  in  outline.  The  base 
is  bordered  by  a  thick  annulated  ridge,  arching  downward  toward  the  middle 
and  moderately  deflected  at  the  extremities.  The  free  border  is  sharp  and 
somewhat  arcuate,  and  the  apex  is  slightly  acuminate.  The  anterior  sur- 
face of  the  crown  slopes  outwardly.  The  posterior  deeper  surface  is  concave 
at  its  lower  median  portion.  The  fang  is  about  as  long  as  the  crown  is  exter- 
nally, but  is  not  so  wide.     Its  extremity  is  angular  and  everted. 

The  measurements  of  the  tooth  are  as  follows : 

Lines. 

Length  of  tooth  iu  the  entire  condition  about 19 

Breadth  of  crown  at  base 20 

Length  of  crown  externally 9.^ 

Length  of  crown  internally 12 

Length  of  fang  externally 9^ 

Breadth  of  fang 14 

Similar  teeth  from  the  Coal-measures  of  Illinois  have  been  described  by 
Professor  Newberry,  under  the  name  of  Petalodus  destructor,  in  the  work 
above  mentioned.  Others  have  also  been  described  or  indicated,  from  the 
Coal-measures  of  Indiana,  Iowa,  and  Nebraska,  by  Mr.  St.  John,  likewise  in 
the  works  above  named. 

ASTERACANTHUS. 

ASTERACANTHUS   SIDEEIUS. 

Incidentally,  I  take  the  opportunity  of  describing  a  fossil  submitted  to  my 
examination  by  Professor  J.  M.  Satford  through  Professor  Hayden.  It  was 
obtained  near  Glasgow,  Tennessee,  and  is  reputed  to  be  of  Sub-carboniferous 
age.  The  specimen  consists  of  a  fragment  of  an  ichthyodorulite,  or  fossil- 
iish  spine,  and  is  represented  in  Fig.  59,  Plate  XXXII.  It  appears  to  indi- 
cate a  species  of  the  extinct  genus  Asteracanthus,  the  remains  of  which  had 
previously  only  been  found  in  formations  of  later  age  than  that  above  men- 
tioned. 

40  G 


314 

The  fragment  is  from  an  intermediate  position  at  the  junction  of  the  root 
and  shaft,  and  is  a  little  over  3  inches  in  length.  It  looks  as  if  when  in  a 
complete  condition  it  had  been  upwards  of  a  foot  in  length,  approximating 
that  of  the  dorsal  spine  of  A.  ornatissinms.  Broken  off  at  both  extremities, 
and  also  posteriorly,  so  as  to  leave  no  portion  of  the  usual  groove,  it  appears 
as  a  solid,  porous  bone-fragment,  triangular  in  transverse  section  toward  the 
apex,  and  oblong  toward  the  root. 

The  sides  of  the  shaft  are  closely  studded  with  mammillary  tubercles, 
arranged  in  rows  directed  upward  and  forward.  The  tubercles  incline  in  the 
same  direction,  and  have  their  sides  longitudinally  striated.  Their  summits 
are  worn  away,  the  extent  of  abrasion  increasing,  approaching  the  anterior 
border  of  the  spine. 


SYNOPSIS  OF   THE   EXTINCT   VERTEBRATA   DESCRIBED   OR 
NOTICED  IN  THE  PRESENT  WORK. 


MAMMALIA. 

Carnivora. 

FELIS; 


FeLIS    AUGUSTUS.  * 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  39. 

Described  page  227  of  the  present  work,  and  represented  by  Figs.  18,  19, 
Plate  VII,  and  Fig.  24,  Plate  XX.  From  the  Pliocene  of  the  Niobrara 
River,  Nebraska. 

Felis  imperialis. 

Founded  on  an  upper-jaw  fragment,  containing  the  second  premolar  tooth, 
from  the  Quaternary  of  California.  Described  page  228,  and  represented 
by  Fig.  3,  Plate  XXXI. 

Canid^. 

CANIS. 
Cants  indianensis. 

Leidy :  Ext.  Mam;  of  N.  America  1SG9,  368. 

Canis  primccvus.    Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  "Nat.  Sc.  1854,  200 ;   Jour.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  185G, 
III,  1G7,  Plate  XVII,  Figs.  11,  12. 

Founded  on  an  upper  maxillary  with  teeth  from  the  banks  of  the  Ohio, 
near  Evansville,  Indiana.  Also  indicated  by  the  ramus  of  a  lower  jaw 
from  California.     Quaternary. 

See  page  230  for  description  of  the  latter  specimen,  represented  by  Fig.  2, 
Plate  XXXI. 

Canis  vafer. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1858,  21 ;  1870, 109 ;  Ext.  Mam.  of  N.  America  18G9,  3G8. 

Founded  on  jaw-fragments  with  teeth  from  the  Pliocene  of  the  Niobrara 
River,  Nebraska,  and  Sweetwater  River,  Wyoming. 


316 

FAMILIES    UNDETERMINED. 

PATRIOFELIS. 
Patriofelis  ulta. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  10 ;  Haydeu's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Wyoming  1871,  344; 
Hayden's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana  1872,  355. 

Founded  on  the  mutilated  rami  of  a  lower  jaw  from  the  Bridger  Eocene 
Tertiary,  "Wyoming.     Described  page  114,  and  represented  by  Fig.  10, 
Plate  II. 

UINTACYON. 

Probably  the  same  as  Miacis,  described  by  Professor  Cope  in  the  Proc. 
Am.  Phil.  Soc.  1872,  470. 

UlNTACYON    EDAX. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  277. 

Founded  on  the  ramus  of  a  lower  jaw  from  the  Bridger  Eocene  Tertiary 
of  Wyoming.  Described  page  118,  and  represented  by  Figs.  6  to  10, 
Plate  XXVII. 

UlNTACyON   VORAX. 

Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  277. 

Founded  on  a  lower-jaw  fragment  from  the  Bridger  Eocene  Tertiary  of 
Wyoming.  Described,  page  120,  and  represented  by  Figs.  11  to  13, 
Plate  XXVII. 

SINOPA. 

SiNOPA    RAPAX. 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,  115;  Hayden's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana  1872,  355. 

Founded  on  a  lower-jaw  fragment  with  teeth  from  the  Bridger  Eocene 
Tertiary  of  Wyoming.  Described  page  116,  and  represented  in  Fig.  44, 
Plate  VI. 

SiNOPA   EXIMIA. 

Indicated  Ijy  a  lower-jaw  fragment,  described  page  118,  and  represented 
in  Fig.  45,  Plate  VI.     From  the  Bridger  Eocene  Tertiary  of  Wyoming. 

MuSTELIDiE. 

LUTRA I 

LUTRA   PISCINARIA. 

Indicated  by  a  tibia,  described  page  230,  and  represented  in  Fig.  4,  Plate 
XXXI.     From  (he  Pliocene  Tertiary  of  Idaho. 


317 

ARTIODACTYLA. 

Ruminantia. 

Camelid^. 

AUCHENIA. 

AUCHENIA    HESTERNA. 

Founded  on  specimens  of  teeth  described  page  255,  and  represented  in 
Figs.  1  to  3,  Plate  XXXVII.     From  the  Quaternary  of  California. 

PROCAMELUS.  s.  Protocamelus. 

Procamelus  occidentalis  ? 

Leidy :  Pr,  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1858,  23,  89 ;  Ext.  Mam.  K  America  1869,  382. 

See  page  258  of  the  present  work,  and  represented  by  Figs.  21,  22,  Plate 
XX.     Pliocene  of  Nebraska  and  Texas? 

Pkocamelus  robustus  ? 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1858,  89;  Ext.  Mam.  N.  America  1SG9,  381. 

See  page  259  of  the  present  work.     Pliocene  of  Nebraska  and  Texas. 

Procamelus  virginiensis. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873,  15. 

Page  259,  and  represented  by  Figs.  26  to  29,  Plate  XXVII.  Founded  on 
teeth  from  the  Miocene  of  Virginia. 

Procamelus  ?  niobrarensis. 

Megalomeryx  niobrarensis  ?    Leidy :   Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1858,  24  ,•   Ext.  Mam.  Da- 
kota and  Nebraska  1869,  161,  Plate  XIV,  Figs.  12  to  14. 

See  page  260,  under  the  name  of  Megalomeryx  niobrarensis  ?  and  repre- 
sented in  Figs.  24,  25,  Plate  XXVII.  Founded  on  teeth  from  the  Plio- 
cene of  the  Niobrara  River,  and  from  L'Eau  qui  Court  County,  Ne- 
braska. 

CERVIDiS. 

LEPTOMERYX. 

Leptomeryx  Evansl 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1853,  394 ;  1870,  112  ;  Ext.  Mam.  N.  America  1869, 383. 

Noticed  from  the  Miocene  of  Oregon,  page  216.  Originally  described 
from  the  Miocene  of  Dakota, 


318 

MERYCODUS 
Merycodus  necatus. 

Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1854,  90, 157  ;  1857,  89  ;  1858,  23  ;  1870,  109;  Ext.  Mam. 
N.  America  18G9,  382. 

Noticed  from  the  Pliocene  of  Sweetwater  River,  Wyoming.  Originally 
described  from  Bijou  Hill  and  from  Little  White  River,  or  the  South 
Fork  of  White  Earth  River,  Dakota. 

BoviDiE. 

BISON. 

Bison  latifrons. 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1852,  117  ;  Mem.  Ext.  Sp.  American  Ox  in  Smiths.  Con- 
trib.  1852,  8;  Ext.  Mam.  N.  America  18G9,  371. 

Noticed  from  the  Quaternary  of  California  and  Pennsylvania,  page  253,  and 
represented  in  Figs.  4  to  8,  Plate  XXVIII. 

Found  in  the  Quaternary  of  Pennsylvania,  Georgia,  South  Carolina,  Ken- 
tucky, Mississippi,  Texas,  and  California. 

Oreodontid^. 

OREODON. 

Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1851,  238. 
Merycoido(lo7i.    Leidy :  Pr,  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1848,  47. 

Oreodon  Culbertsoni. 

Leidy:  Owens's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  1852,548;    Ext,  Mara.  N.America  1869,379; 
Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  67,  112. 

Noticed  from  John  Day's  River,  Oregon,  page  211,  and  I'epresented  in 
Fig.  12,  Plate  VII. 

Professor  Marsh  has  recently  described  some  remains  from  the  Miocene  of 
Oregon,  under  the  name  of  Oreodon  occidentalis.  (Am.  Jour.  Sc.  May, 
1873.)  He  observes  that  it  resembles  O.  Culbertsoni  in  most  of  its 
cranial  characters,  but  differs  materially  in  the  large  auditory  bulltfi. 
From  this,  I  suspect  the  remains,  together  with  those  I  have  described 
from  Oregon  under  the  last-mentioned  name,  belong  to  the  species  I 
have  elsewhere  named  O.  hullatus. 

Professor  Marsh  observes  that,  "in  comparing  the  various  species  of  Oreo- 
don, some  new  points  in  the  structure  of  the  genus  were  observed."  He 
then  gives  in  the  formula  of  dentition  the  number. of  incisors  as  f ,  canines 
T,  premolars  4,  molars  f ,  and  adds :     "  The  caniniform  tooth  of  the    lower 


319 

jaw  is  clearly  tlic  first  premolar,  as  Dr.  Gill  has  stated.''  As  may  be 
seen  by  referring  to  pages  84  and  85  of  the  Extinct  Mammalia  of  Dakota 
and  Nebraska,  although  giving  the  formula  of  dentition  of  Oreodon  as — 
incisors  f,  canines  t,  premolars  I,  molars  t,  I  observe  that  the  inferior 
canine  is  a  transformed  premolar,  and  that  the  inferior  lateral  incisor,  as 
in  other  ruminants,  is  to  be  regarded  as  an  incisiform  canine. 

Okeodon  superbus. 

Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1S70,  111. 

Described,  page  211,  and  represented  by  Fig.  1,  Plate  I;  Fig.  16,  Plate  II; 
and  Figs.  7  to  1 1,  Plate  VII.     From  the  Miocene  of  Oregon. 

MERYCOCHCERUS. 
Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1858,  24 ;  Ext.  Mam.  N.  America  18G9,  380. 

Merycochcerus  rusticus. 

Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  109. 

Described  page  199,  and  represented  by  Figs.  1  to  3,  Plate  III ;  Figs.  1 
to  5,  Plate  YII;  and  Figs.  9  to  11,  Plate  XX.  From  the  Pliocene  of 
Sweetwater  River,  Wyoming. 

AGRIOCHCERUS. 

Agriochcerus  antiquus. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1850,  121 ;    Ext.  Mam.  N.  America  1809,  381 ;    Pr.  Ac. 
Nat.  Sc.  1870,  112. 

Noticed  from  the  Miocene  of  Oregon,  page  216. 

Agriochcerus  latifrons. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  18G7,  32  ;  1870,  G7 ;  Ext.  Mam.  N.  America  18G9,  381. 

Noticed  from  the  Miocene  of  Oregon,  page  216. 

Omnivora. 

SuiD^. 

DICOTYLES. 

DiCOTYLES   PRISTINUS. 

Peccary.  .  Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  112. 

Described  page  216,  and  represented  by  Figs.  13,  14,  Plale  VII.     From 


the  Miocene  of  Oregon. 


320 

ANTHRACOTHERIDiE. 

ELOTHERIUM. 

Pomel :  Bibl.  Uuiv.  Geneve,  Archives,  1847,  307. 

Entelodon.    Aymard :  Mem.  Soc.  Agric.,  &c.,  dii  Pay  1848,  240. 

Archa'otherium.    Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1850,  90. 

Elotherium  Morton  1 1 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1857,  175 ;  Ext.  Mam.  N.  America  1809,  388, 
Noticed  from  Wyoming,  page  125,  and  represented  by  Figs.  28,  29,  Plate 
VII. 

Elotherium  imperator. 

Inferred  from  several  mutilated  teeth  from  the  Miocene  of  Oregon,  de- 
scribed page  217,  and  represented  in  Figs.  3,  4,  Plate  II,  and  Fig.  27, 
Plate  VII.  •  Supposed  to  be  the  same  as  E.  superhuin  in  Pr.  Ac.  Nat. 
Sc.  1870,  112. 

Elotherium  ingens. 

Leidy :  Ext.  Mam.  N.  America  1SC9,  388 ;  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  112. 

Noticed  from  the  Miocene  of  Oregon.  Orighially  from  the  Miocene  of 
White  River,  Dakota. 

FAMILIES   UNDETERMINED. 

HYOPSODUS. 

Hyopsodus  paulus. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  110 ;  1872,  20 ;    Hayden's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Wyo- 
ming 1871,  354 ;  Hayden's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana  1872,  363. 

To  this  species,  described  page  75,  I  refer  Figs.  I  to  9,  18  to  22,  Plate  VI. 
From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Hyopsodus  minusculus. 

This  species,  described  page  81,  is  represented  by  Fig.  5,  Plate  XXVII. 
From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

MICROSYOPS. 

Leidy :   Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  20 ;   Hayden's  Prelim.  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana 

1873,  3G3. 
Limnotlierium.    In  part  of  Marsh :  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1871,  II,  42. 

MiCROSYOPS  elegans. 

Limnothcrmm  cicgans.    Mar.sli :  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1871,  11,  43. 
Microsijops  gracilis.    Leidy :   Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  20 ;    Hayden's  Prelim.  Eep. 
Geol.  Sur.  Montana  1872,  363. 


321 

111  ]\Iicrosyops,  six  molar  teeth  imineiliatcly  succeed  the  canine  in  tlie  lower 
jaw.  In  the  typical  Limnotherium  clegans  seven  molars  occupy  the  same 
position.  Described  page  82,  and  represented  by  Figs.  14,  17,  Plate  VI. 
From  the  Bridger  Eocene  formation  of  Wyoming. 

MICROS  US. 

MiCKOSUS   CUSPIDATUS.  ■ 

Leitly :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  113. 

Sec  page  81  ;  not  positively  determined  as  a  distinct  species  and  genus. 
Represented  by  Figs.  10,  11,  Plate  VI.  From  the  Bridger  Eocene 
formation  of  Wyoming. 

HIPPOSYUS. 

HlPPOSYUS   FORMOSUS. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  37. 

Described  from  a  few  isolated  teeth,  page  90,  and  represented  in  Fig.  41, 
Plate  VI,  and  Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  XXVII.  From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of 
Wyoming. 

HlPPOSYUS    EOBUSTIOE. 

Notharctiis  rohustior,     Leidy  :  Hayden's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana  1872,  304. 

Described  page  93,  and  represented  by  Fig.  40,  Plate  VI.  Fnnii  the 
Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

HADROHYUS. 

HADROnVtlS   SUPREMUS. 

Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,  248. 

Indicated  by  a  mutilated  tooth  from  the  Miocene  of  Oregon.  Described 
pa'ge  222,  and  represented  by  Fig.  26,  Plate  XVII. 

PERISSODACTYLA, 

Sulidungula. 

Equid^e. 

EQUUS. 
Equus  major. 

Dekay:   Nat.  Hist.  New  York,  Zool.  1842,  108.     Leidy:   Ext.  Mam.  N,  America 

1869,  .399. 
Eqmis  complicatus.    Leidy  :   Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1858,  11 ;    Ext.  iMaiii.  N.  America 
1809,  399. 

41    G 


322 

Remains  describud  iiage  244,  and   represented  by  Fii^s.  3  to   18,  Plate 
XXXIII.     From  the  Quaternary  of  the  United  States. 

Equus  occidentalis. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1865,  94. 
f  Equus.     Von  Me\-er:  Palitoutographica  1867,  70. 

Equus  cxcclsus.    Leidy :   Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1868,  26 ;   Ext.  Mam.  Dakota  and  Ne- 
braska 1869,  266,  400,  Plate  XIX,  Fig.  39 ;  XXI,  Fig.  31. 
Equus  imcifims-    Leidy :    Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1868,  195 ;    Ext.  Mam.  N.  America 
1869,  400. 

Described  page  242,  and  represented  by  Figs..  1,  2,  Plate  XXXIII.     From 
the  Quaternary  I  of  Nebraska,  Idaho,  California,  and  Mexico. 

* 

HIPPARION. 

HiPPARION    SPECIOSUM  ? 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1858,  27  ;  Ext.  Mam.  N.  America  1869,  401. 

See  pages  247,  248,  and  Figs.  14,  Ih,  Plate  XX.     From  the  Tertiary  of 
Texas. 

PROTOHIPPUS,  s.  MERYCHIPPUS. 

Peotohippus  perditus  (?)  s.  Merychippus  mirabilis  ? 

Protohippits  perditus.     Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1858,  20;  Ext.  Mam.  N.  America 

1809,  401. 
MerycM]>piis  mirabilis.    Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1858,  27. 

See  pages  248,  249,  250,  and  Figs.  16,  20,  Plate  XX.     From  the  Tertiary 
of  Texas  and  Utah. 

PrOTOHIPPUS   PLACIDUS. 

Leidy:  Ext.  :Mam.  N.  America  1869,  401. 

See  pages  249,  250,  and  Figs.  17,  18,  Plate  XX.     From  the  Tertiary  of 
Texas. 

Anchitherid^. 
ANCHITHERIUM. 

Meyer :  Jalirlnicli  Miueralogie  1844,  298. 

Anchitherium  Bairdi. 

Leidy:  Owen's  liep.  Geol.  Sur.  Wisconsin,  &c.,  1852,  572;  Ext.  Mam.  N.  Amer- 
ica 18G9,  402 ;  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  112. 


323 

A  full  account  of  the  remains  of  tlio  species  from  the  Mauvaises  Terres  of 
White  River,  Dakota,  is  given  in  the  Extinct  Mammalia  of  Dakota  anil 
Nebraska,  page  303.  A  notice  of  remains  from  Oregon  is  given  page 
218  of  the  present  work,  and  a  tooth  representing  the  species  is  given 
in  Fig.  15,  Plate  VII.     Miocene. 

Anchitheeium  Condoni. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  112. 

Described  page  218,  and  represented  by  Fig.  5,  Phitc  J  I.  From  the 
Miocene  of  Oregon.        . 

ANCHITIlERIUiM   AGRESTE. 

Anchitherium.     Leidy:  Vr.  Ac.  Nat.  Se.  1871,  101). 

Described  page  251,  and  represented   by  Figs.  IG,  17,  Plate  VII.      From 

the  Miocene  ?  of  Montana. 

Anchitherium  ?  austeale. 

Described  page  250,  and  represented  l)y  Fig.  IJ),  Plate  XX.  Fnnn  the 
Tertiary  of  Texas. 

1  Anchitheehtm. 

Uquvs.     Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  18G8,  195. 
Uqmis  parvulus.     Marsh:  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1808. 

Noticed  page  252,  and  represented  by  Fig.  23,  Plate  XX.  From  the 
Tertiary  of  Nebraska. 

PAL^OSYOPS. 

Leidy:    Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  11.3 ;    1871,  111,  118,  197,  229;    1872,  168,211. 
"    Haydeu's  Prelim.  Eep.  Geol.  Sar.  Wyoming  1871,  355.    Hayden's  Prelim.  Kep. 

Geol.  Sur.  Moutaiia  1872,  358,  published  April,  1772. 
Telmatherium.     Marsh  :  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1872,  IV,  123,  published  iu  ad\ance  July 

22,  1872. 
Limnohyns.     Mar.sh  :  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1872,  IV,  121,  published  iu  advaucc  July  22, 

1872.     Cope:  Pr.  Am.  Phil.  See.  1873. 

Remains  referable  to  the  genus  Palteosyops  are  the  most  common  of  Ihosi! 
of  the  larger  extinct  mammals  occurring  in  the  Bridger  Eocene  formation 
of  Wyoming.  The  genus  was  originally  indicated  by  characteristic  spec- 
imens of  teeth  represented  in  Figs.  4,  5,  Plate  V,  and  Figs.  3  to  G,  Plate 
XXIII.  Subsequently  a  numlscr  of  specimens  were  received  from  time 
to  time  and  indicated  in  tiie  Proceedings  of  the  Academy  from  1870  to 
1872,  and  in  Professor  Hayden's  Preliminary  Report  of  the  Geological   8ur- 


324 

veys  of  Wyoming  and  Montana.  In  the  report  on  Montana,  published  in 
April,  1872,  the  characters  of  the  genus  arc  succinctly  stated.  Pateo- 
syops  is  described  "as  an  odd-toed  pachyderm,  with  the  skeleton  con- 
structed nearly  as  in  the  tapir.  The  thigh-bone  possesses  a  tliird  tro- 
chanter. The  hind  feet  nearly  repeat  the  construction  of  those  of  the 
tapir.  The  skull,  with  its  large  temporal  fossae,  high  and  thick  sagittal 
crest,  concave  occiput,  broad,  convex  face,  resembled  that  of  the  related 
Palaeotherium.  The  teeth  also  agree  in  number  and  nearly  in  constitu- 
tion with  those  of  that  animal.  The  number  of  teeth  altogether  appear 
to  .have  been  44,  consisting  of  3  incisors,  1  canine,  4  premolars,  and  3 
molars  to  the  series  on  each  side,  above  and  below.  The  teeth  in  each 
jaw  form  a  nearly  unbroken  arch,  intervals  existing  only  sufficient  to 
accommodate  the  passing  of  the  points  of  the   large  and   bear-like  canines. 

"The  true  molars  have  a  resemblance  to  those  of  Palaeotherium.  In  the 
crowns  of  the  upper  true  molars  the  inner  constituent  lobes  are 
more  completely  isolated  from  the  outer  ones  than  in  that  genus,  and  the 
bottoms  of  the  transverse  valleys  are  proportionately  of  less  depth.  T//e 
last  vpper  molar  of  Palceosyops.  has  hut  a  single  lobe  to  the  inner  part  of 
the  a'oio7i.  , 

"In  Palasotherium,  the  large  premolars  have  the  same  form  as  the  true 
molars,  but  are  quite  different  in  this  respect  in  Palasosyops.  In  tlie 
iormer  the  crown  of  the  upper  premolars,  except  the  first,  is  composed 
of  four  lobes,  as  in  the  succeeding  molars.  In  Palasosyops  the  first  pre- 
molar has  a  conical  crown,  the  second  a  bilobed  crown,  "and  the  third 
and  fourth  have  trilobed  crowns. 

"  The  canines  of  Palaeosyops  arc  proportionately  as  large  and  of  the  same 
form  as  in  the  bears  " 

In  an  article  in  the  American  Journal  of  Science,  1872,  V,  published  iu 
advance  July  22,  1872,  Professor  Marsh,  after  remarking  that  the  type 
of  the  genus  Palaeosyops  is  too  imperfectly  known  to  determine  its  more 
important  characters,  adds  that,  "in  some '  specimens  which  agree  best 
with  the  original  description  of  paludosus,  the  last  upper  molar  has  tiro 
inner  cones^  and  to  this  group  tlie  name  Palaeosyops  may  in  future  be 
restricted.  Tlie  other  specimens  have  but  a  single  infernal  cone  on  tie 
last  upper  molar,  and  for  the  genus  thus  represented  the  name  Limno- 
hyus  is  proposed." 


325 

In  I  his  view  Professor  Cope  has  recently  descrilted  some  remains  of  I'aln'- 
os3()[is  under  the  name  oi'  Liiii/whi/us  Iceoideiis. 

Teeth  such  as  I  have  attributed  to  Palaeosyops  arc  comparatively  abundant, 
but  I  have  not  yet  had  the  opportunity  of  inspecting  a  specimen  of  a 
last  upper  molar,  such  as  Professor  Marsh  ascribes  to  Palaeosyops,  in 
which  the  inner  side  of  the  crown  possesses  two  internal  cones.  That 
such  exist  there  can  be  no  question,  as  proved  by  Professor  Marsh's 
description  of  Palaeosyops  laticeps. 

Professor  Marsh  has  described  some  remains  which  he  refers  to  a  genus 
wilh  the  name  of  Tehnatherium.  Of  this,  he  observes:  "The  dcniition 
of  til's  genus,  so  far  as  is  known,  appears  to  be  similar  to  that  of  PalaBo- 
syops.  The  upper  molar  teeth  have  the  inner  cones  more  elevf^ted  and 
more  pointed  than  in  Paheosyops,  and  the  Ijasal  ridge  is  well  developed 
The  last  upper  molar  has  l)ut  a  single  internal  cone."  He  also  remarks 
that  " the  two  may  be  i-eadily  distinguished  i)y  the  anterior  portion  of  the 
skull,  which  in  Telmatherium  has  the  premaxillaries  compressed,  with  an 
elongated  median  suture.  The  zygomatic  arch  is  also  much  less  strongly 
developed,  and  the  squamosal  portion  of  it  is  comparatively  slender.''  Such 
differences  are  more  likely  to  be  of  a  sexual  or  individual  character  than  of 
either  specific  or  generic  value. 

Since  writing  the  preceding  chapters  we  have  attempted  to  give  a  restora- 
tion of  the  skull  of  Palseosyops  in'  Fig.  1,  Plate  XXXI,  built  up  from  a 
number  of  specimens.  The  cranium  and  face  were  mainly  reconstructed 
from  the  specimens  of  Fig.  51,  Plate  XVIII,  and  Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  XXIV; 
the  lower  jaw  from  the  specimen  of  Fig.  52,  of  the  latter  plate,  and  Fig. 
4,  of  the  former  plate. 

1.  Pal^osyops  paludosus. 

Leitly:    Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  113 ;    1871,114,197,229;    1S72,  1G8;    Hayilcii's 

Hep.  U.  S.  Geol.  Sur.  Wyoiuiug  1S71,  355;    llaydeii's  itup.  U.  S.  Geo).  Sur. 

Moutaua  1872,  359. 
Pulmosijops.    Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  So.  1871,  118. 
Ijbnnohijus  hvvidens.   Cope:  Pr.  Am.  Pljil.  Soc.  1873,  article  published  in  advance 

.January  31,  1873. 

The  description  of  the  species  is  given  on  page  28  of  the  present  work. 
The  specimens  represented  in  Figs.  1  to  8,  Plate  IV;  Figs.  4  to  11, 
Plate  V ;   Figs.  1  to  4,  Plate  XIX ;    Figs.  I  to  7,  Plate  XX ;    Figs.  3  tp 


32(1 

G,  Plate  XXIII;   F'ijr.s.  C,  7.  Plate  XXIV;  and  Fig.  5,  Plate  XXIX,  are 

considered  as  pertaining  ti)  Palceosj/ops  j'aludosus. 
A  fine  specimen,  C(nisisti.iig  of  the  greater  part  of"  a  skull,  exhibited   by 
Professor   Cope   to   the   Academy,   and  described  I)y   him   under  the    name 
of  Limnokyus   Icevide.ns,    appeared    to    me  to    be  the    same    as   Palceosyops 
paludosus.     From  the  Bridger  Eocene  formation  of  Wyoming. 

2.  Pal.eosyops  major. 

Leidy:    Haydeu's  Prelim.  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana,  April,  1872,359;    Pr.  Ac.  ' 
Nat.  Sc.  1872,  1G8,  L'41.  '    • 

■   Lymnohyus  robustus.     Marsh:  Ain.  Jour.  Sc.  1872,  IV,  121,  published  iu  advance 
July  22,  1872. 

I  am  not  convinced  that  this  is  a  really  distinct  species  from  Palceosyops 
paludosus.  A  large  number  of  specimens  referable  to  the  genus  would 
indicate  a  considerable  variation  in  the  size  of  individnals,  of  which  the 
more  robust  forms  may  have  been  males.  The  species  is  described  on 
page  45.  The  specimens  regarded  as  pertaining  to  it  are  represented 
in  Fig.  8,  Plate  XX;  Figs.  1,2,  7  to  12,  14  to  16,  Plate  XXIII;  and 
Figs.  1  to  5,  Plate  XXIV.  From  the  Bridger  Eocene  formation  of 
Wyoming. 

3.  PaLJEOSYOPS    IIUMILIS. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  IGS,  277. 

Probably  a  small  species  indicated  ])y  an  upper  molar,  represented  in  Fig. 
8,  Plate  XXIV,  and  noticed  page  58.  From  the .  Bridger  Eocene  of 
Wyoming. 

4.  PaL.EOSYOPS    JUNIUS. 

Paltvosyops  junior.     Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  li?72,  277. 

Descril)e(l  page  57.     From  tlie  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

LIMNOHYUS. 

LiMNOHYUS   LATICEPS. 

Palmosyops  laticeps.    Marsh :  Aui.  Jour.  Sc.  1872,  122. 

■Indicated  page  58,  and  represented  by  Fig.  13,  Plate  XXIII.  From  the 
Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 


327  ■       ■ 

HYRACHYUS. 

Hyuachvus  agrarius. 

Lekly:  naydon'.s  rrclim.  Rep.  Geol.  Siir.  Wyoming  1871,  ;557 ;  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc. 

1871,  229 ;  1872,  19,  108;  Hayden's  Eep.  Geol.  Siir.  Montana  1872,  301. 
Hymchyus  luiresfis.     Leidy  :  Ilayden's  Hep.  Geol.  Snr.  Wyoming  1871,  357. 
Lophiodon   liairdiimus.     Marsh:  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1S71,  II,  .">. 

Tiie  species  is  (leseribcd  page  GO  of  tlie  present  work,  and  specimens 
attributed  to  it  are  represented  in  Figs.  11,  12,  Plate  II;  Figs.  9  to  18, 
Plate  IV ;  and  Figs.  2.5,  2G,  Plate  XX.  From  the  Bridgcr  Eocene  of 
Wyoniiug. 

Hyrachyus  eximius. 

Leidy:   Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,  229;    1872,168;   Haydcn's  Rep.  Geol.  Sur.  Mon- 
tana 1872,  301. 

Descrilied  page-  66,  and  represented  liy  Figs.  19,  20,  Plate  IV  ;  Fig.  5, 
Plate  XIX;  and  Figs.  9,  10,  Plate  XXVI.  From  the  Bridger  Eocene 
of  Wyoming. 

Hyrachyus  modestus. 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  20;    Hayden's  Rep.  Geol.  Snr.  Montana  1872,  301. 
LopModon  modestus.    Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  109. 

Described  page  67,  and  represented  hy  Fig.  13,  Plate  II.  From  the 
Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Hyrachyus  nanus. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  20 ;  Hayden's  Rep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana  1872,  361. 
°? LopModon  nanus.     Marsh:  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1871,  II,  37. 

Described  page  67,  and  represented  by  Fig.  14,  Plate  II ;  Fig.  42,  Plate 
VI;  Fig.  11,  Plate  XXVI;  and  Figs.  21,  22,  Plate  XXVII.  From 
the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

LOPHIODON  ? 

LOPIIIODON    OCCIDENTALIS. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1808,  232 ;  Ext.  Mam.  N.  America  1809,  391. 

Noticed  as  probably  found  in  the  Miocene  of  Oregon,  page  218,  and  repre- 
sented in  Fig.  1,  Plate  II. 

LOPHIOTHERIUM. 

LOPHIOTHERIIIM    SYLVATICUM. 

Leidv :  Pr,  Ac.  Nat.  Se.  1870,  120. 


328 

Described  pngc  69,  and  represented  by  Figs.  33  to  35,  Plate  VI.     From 
the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

RHINOCEROTIDyE. 

RHINOCEROS. 
Rhinoceros  pacificus. 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,  248. 

Rhinoceros  occidentalis.    Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  112. 

Described  from  teeth  on  page  221,  and  represented  by  Figs.  6,  7,  Plate 
II,  and  Figs.  24,  25,  Plate  VII.     From  the  Miocene  of  Oregon. 

Rhinoceros  hesperiusI  * 

Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1865,  17« ;  1870,  112;  Ext.  Mam.  N.  America,  1869, 390. 

Originally  described  from  the  ramus  of  a  lower  jaw  from  the  Miocene  1  of 
California.     Also  supposed  to  be  indicated  by  teeth  described  page  220, 
and  represented  by  Figs.  8,  9,  Plate  II,  from  the  Miocene  of  Oregon. 
In  the  May  number  of  the  American  Journal  of  Science  for  1873,  Professor 
Marsh    has    noticed  remains   of   rhinoceros,  which  he  refers  to   two    addi- 
tional species.     One  named  Ji.  annectens  is   founded   on  remains  from  the 
same    formation    as    those   of  the   preceding    species.     The    other,    named 
R.  oregonensis,   is   reputed  to  have    pertained    to   the   Pliocene   deposits  of 
Oregon. 

families  undetermined. 

AKCHIPPODUS. 

Anciiippodus  riparius 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1868,  2.32 ;  Ext.  Mam.  N.  America,  iu  Jour.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc. 

1869,  VII,  403,  Figs.  45,  46,  Plate  XXX. 
Palwosyops  minor.     Marsli :  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1871,  II,  3C. 
TrogosHs  castoridens.    Leidy:   Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,  113;    Ilay  den's  Eep.  Geol. 

Sur.  Moutiuia  1872,  360. 

Described  page  71,  under  the  name  of  Trogosus  castoridcna,  and  also  repre- 
sented as  such  in  Figs.  1  to  3,  Plate  V. 

The  genus  Anchippodus  was  originally  named  from  an  isolated  tooth  from 
a  Tertiary  formation  of  Monmouth  County,  New  Jersey.  The  speci- 
men is  represented  in  Figs.  45,  46,  Plate  XXX,  of  the  seventh  volume 
of  the  Journal  of  the  Academy  for  1869,  and  is  described  on  page  403 
of  that  work.     It  was    not    nntil  after  the    description    of    the    lower    jaw 


329 

referred  to  Trogosus  caslorldens,  ov,  page  71  oi'  Uie  present  work,  and 
represented  under  the  same  name  in  Figs.  1  to  3,  Plate  V,  that  I  noticed 
the  identity  in  character  of  the  corresponding  tooth.  Previous  (o  the 
descrijition  of  the  jaw  referred  to  Trogosus,  Professor  Marsh  had  puh- 
Hshed  a  notice  of  a  simiUir  tooth  under  tlie  name  of  Falcnosyops  minor. 

It  is  not  improbable,  after  all,  that  Trogosus  may  be  distinct  from  Anchip- 
podus,  for  there  are  several  genera  which,  while  they  have  the  inferior 
true  molars  alike,  have  the  premolars  and  upper  true  molars  quite  differ- 
ent. While  regarding  Trogosus  the  same  as  Anchippodus,  for  the  same 
reason  I  have  considered  Trogosus  castoriclens  the  same'  as  Anch'qjpoclus 
riparlus,  for  the  specimen  upon  which  the  latter  was  originally  made  known 
is  identical  in  form  and  size  with  the  corresponding  tooth  in  the  jaw  of 
the  former.  Nor  is  it  improbable  that  they  are  the  same,  for  they  were 
probably  of  contemporaneous  age,  and  perhaps  extended  throughout  the 
continent,  as  the  American  mastodon  did  at  a  later  period.  Specimen 
from  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming 

Anchippodus  vetulus. 

Trogosus  vetulus.     Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,  229;  Ilaydeii's  Kep.  Gcol.  Snr. 
Moutaua  1872,  3G0. 

Noticed  on  page  75,  under  the  name  of  Trogosus  vetulus,  and  represented, 
with  the  name  of  Anchqrpodus  vetulus,  in  Fig.  43,  Plate  VI.  From  the 
Bridger  Eocene  af  Wyoming. 

NGTHARCTUS. 

NoTHARCTUS    TENEBROSUS. 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  114. 

Described  page  86,  and  represented  by  Figs.  3(i,  37,  Plate  VI.  From  tlie 
Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Proboscidea. 

ELEPHAS. 

Elepiias  americanus. 

Dekay :  Nat.  Hist.  New  Tork,  Zoo].,  1842, 1, 101,     Leidy  :  Ext.  Jlaiii.  N.  America 

1869,  398. 
Elvphas  Golumbi.    Falconer:  Quart.  Jour.  Geol.  Soc.  1857,  .'!19,  &{•,. 
Elcphas  Texiauus.     Owen  :  liep.  Brit.  Asso.  1858,  84,  &c. 
Elcphas  imperator.     Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1858,  10. 

42  G         ' 


330 

•  Eucleplias  Jaclsoni.    Briggs  and  Foster :   Caiiail.  Nat.  and  Geol.  1SG3,  135,  147. 
Eitclejjhas  Columhi.     Falconer:   Pahi'ont.  Mom.  ISGS,  II,  211  to  231. 
Elcphas.     Von  Meyer :  PaU-coutograpliica,  18G7,  70,  Plate  VII,  Figs.  7,  S. 

See  page  238.     Remains  noticed  from  New  Mexico  and  Texas. 

MASTODON. 

Mastodon  americanus. 

Leidy:   Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1868,  175.     For  synonymy,  see  Extinct  Mammalia  of 
North  America  1809,  392. 

Some  remains  described  or  noticed  page  237,  and  represented  in  Figs.  5, 

6,  Plate  XXII,  and  Fig.  9,  Plate  XXVIII. 
Remains  of  the  common  American  mastodon  are  found  \i\  the  Quaternary 

formation  throughout  the  United  States. 

Mastodon  mirificus. 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1858,  10;    1870,  67;    Ext.  Mam.  Fanna  of  Dakota  and 

NebraskalSCO,  249,  390. 
Mastodon  (Tetralophodon)  mirificus.    Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1858,  10. 

Remains  originally  described  from  the  Pliocene  of  the  Loup  Fork  of  Platte 
River.  Also  reported  to  occur  on  the  Niobrara  River,  Nebraska.  No- 
ticed page  237.     From  the  Pliocene  of  Sinker  Creek,  Idaho. 

Mastodon  obscurus. 

Leidy :   Ext.  Mam.  N.  America  1809,  390.     For  earlier  synonymy,  see  the  same 

work.    Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  99;  1871,  199;  1S72,  142. 
Mastodon  Shepardi.     Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  98;  1871,  199. 
Rhi/nchotheriuln  ?    See  Falconer :  Palteontological  Memoirs,  ISOS,  II,  74. 


Originally  named  from   remains  found  in   Maryland,   North  Carolina,  and 

Georgia.     See   Extinct  Mamnialian   Fauna  of   Dakota    and    Nebraska, 

1869,  244,  396.     Remains  from  California  and  New  Mexico  described 

page  231  and  represented  in  Figs.  1  to  4,  Plate  XXI  and  Figs.  1  to  4, 

Plate  XXII,  of  the   pres(?nt   work,   are  supposed  in  whole  or  part  to 

belong  to  the  same  species.      If  they  do    not,   they  would  represent 

another  species,  which  might  retain  the  name  of  31.  Shepardi. 

In  the.  Palaeontographica    for    1867,   page   64,   Von   Meyer  has   given  a 

description   of   the  right   ramus   of    the    lower  jaw    of    a    Mastodon,  from 

Mechoacan,  Mexico.     The    specimen    is     represented  in  Plate    VI    of    the 

same    work,  and  it    contains    the    last    molar    and    llie    one    in    advance, 

both    entire.     The  portion    of    the    last   molar  tooth  in    the  jaw-fragment 


331 

iVoni  New  Jlexico,  doscrilx'd  page  235,  and  i('[)ix\seiitcd  in  Figs.  1,  4, 
Plate  XXII,  bears  a  veiy  near  resemblance  vvitli  the  corresponding 
part  of  the  same  tooth  in  the  Mechoacan  specimen.  Notwithstanding 
this  likeness,  it  woidd  appear  that  the  fore  part  of  the  jaw  differs  so 
much  that  tlie  two  may  l)e  supposed  not  to  pertain  to  the  same  species. 
As  stated  in  the  account  of  the  New  Mexico  Mastodon,  the  anterior 
extremity  of  the  jaw  is  enormously  prolonged  and  provided  with  a  pair 
of  incisor's.  Von  Meyer  observes  of  the  Mechoacan  specimen,  "Too 
little  of  the  symphysis  is  preserved  to  speak  with  any  certainty  of  its 
constitution ;  but  it  appears  not  to  have  contained  incisors  and  rather 
ended  in  front  in  a  short  beak,  as  in  the  elephant."  The  jaw  he  I'efers 
with  doubt  to  the  Mastodon  Humholdti. 

-  I  have  said  that  -the  New  Mexican  and  Mechoacan  specimens  may  be 
supposed  not  to  pertain  to  the  same  species.  However,  when  we  con- 
sider the  difference  in  the  fore  part  of  the  lower  jaw  of  the  sexes  in 
the  Mastodon  americanus,  it  is  not  improbable  that  the  male  of  the 
Mastodon  Shepardi  may  have  had  the  lower  jaw  provided  with  a  long 
beak  and  incisors  which  might  have  been  absent  in  the  female. 


'&" 


UINTATHERIUM. 

Titanotlierium.  Marsli :  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1S71,  II,  35 ;  the  article  published  in 
advance  Juue  21,  1871 ;  ibid.  1872,  IV,  123,  ijublished  iu  advance  July  22, 
1872. 

Mastodon.  Marsh:  Am.  Joui-.  Sc.  1872,  note  to  p.  123,  published  iu  advance 
July  22,  1872. 


UlNTATHERIUM. 


Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  1G9 ;  in  a  letter  addressed  to  the  Academy  and 
published  in  advance  of  the  proceedings  August  1,  1872.  Reprinted  in  Am. 
Jour.  Sc.  September,  1872,  239.  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  241.  Marsh:  Pr.  Am. 
Phil.  Soc.  1872,  578;  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1873,  V,  118;  American  Naturalist 
1873, 147.  Cope:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873,  10,  102;  Pr.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  Feb., 
1873.    Nature :  March  13, 1873,  3GG. 

Uititamastix.    Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  169. 

Tinoceras.  Marsh:  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1872,  IV,  in  errata  of  Sept.  No.;  do.,  p.  504, 
published  in  advance  August  19,  1872;  ibid.  1872,  IV,  322,  published  in 
advance  August  24,  1872 ;  ibid.  1872,  IV,  323.  published  iu  advance  Sep- 
tember 21,  1872;  ibid.  1872,  IV,  343,  published  in  advance  September  27, 
1872;  ibid.  1873,  V,  117,  published  in  advance  January  28,  1873;  ibid.  1873, 
V,  293,  published  iu  advance  March' 18,  1873;  American  Naturalist  Jan., 
1873,  52. 


Eohttsileus.  Oojn'  :*  Pr.  Am.  riiil.  Soc.  1872,  4.S5,  pxiblisbed  in  advance  August 
L'O,  1872;  ibid.  1872,  512;  ihiil.  1873,  published  as  a  separate  pamphlet,  "On 
the  Short-Footed  Ungulata  of  the  Eocene  of  Wyoming,"  March  11,  1873 ;  Pr. 
Ac.  Nat.  So.  1873,  10,  102 ;  American  Naturalist,  March  1873,  180. 

LoxoJophodon.  Cope  :  Pr.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  1872,  487,  488,  published  in  advance 
August  22,  1872.  Here  regarded  as  the  same  genus  tirst  named  in  the  Pro- 
ceedings of  February  16,  1872,  420,  and  founded  on  the  tooth  of  an  animal 
about  the  size  of  the  American  tapir,  referred  to  Bathmodon  semicinctus  and 
then  to  Loxolophodon.  Pr.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  1872,  580  ;  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873, 
102. 

LcfalopUodon.     Typograpliical  error?     Cope:  Pr.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  1872,  515. 

IHnoccras.    Marsh  :  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1872,  IV,  344,  published  in  advance  September 

27,  1872;  iUd.   1873,  V,  117-122,  Plates  I,  II,  published  in  advance  January 

28,  1873 ;  ibid.  April,  1873,  published  in  advance  March  18,  1873 ;  American 
Naturalist,  March  1873,  146.     Nature,  March  13,  1873,  3GG. 

Loxolophodon.  Cope:  "  Ou  the  Short-Footed  Ungulata  of  the  Eocene  of 
Wyomiug,"  read  before  the  Am.  Phil.  Soc,  Feb.  21,  1873,  and  published  in 
advance  of  the  Proceedings,  March  14,  1873.  The  name  is  here  used  as  that 
of  a  genus  recognized  as  distinct  from  the  one  originally  described  wuler  tlie 
same  name,  which  the  author  now  regards  as  a  synonym  of  Bathmodon. 

All  the  above  names  I  suspect  to  have  been  applied  to  members  of  the 
same  genus,  and  in  this  view  have  regarded  them  as  synonyms  to  the 
first  characteristic  generic  name  employed.  Of  this,  however,  I  am  by 
no  means  positive,  as  I  have  had  no  opportunity  of  examining  the 
difterent  fossils  upon  which  the  genera  were  founded,  except  those 
described  by  myself  under  the  name  of  Ulntatherium  robustum,  and  the 
skull  described  by  Professor  Cope  under  the  name  of  Loxolophodon  cornutus. 

In  addition,  we  have  the  description  and  figures  of  the  skull  described  by 
Professor  Marsh  under  the  name  of  Dinoceras  inirabilis. 

As  far  as  I  am  al)lc  to  estimate  the  differences  which  have  been  indicated 
by  the  authors  just  named  and  those  observed  by  myself,  they  appear  to  be 
rather  of  specific  value,  and  perhaps  in  part  of  sexual  character,  than  of 
generic  importance.  We  hope,  however,  that  all  obscurity  in  relation  to  the 
matter  will  be  cleared  away  when  Professor  Marsh  and  Professor  Cope 
present  to  ns  full  descriptions  with  characteristic  figures  of  the  fossils  in 
their  possession.  I  may  add  it  is  not  improbable  that  the  names  of 
Uintatherium,  Tinoceras,  Eobasileus,  Dinoceras,  and  Loxolophodon,  may  be 

*  The  dates  given  as  those  of  Professor  Cope's  publications  in  advance  of  the  dif- 
ferent periodicals  named  are  taken  from  the  jiublications  themselves;  but  they  are, 
in  some  instances,  contested  by  Professor  Marsh.  See  an  article  read  before  the 
Philadelphia  Academy  of  Sciences  April  8,  1873,  and  published  by  Professor  Marsh' 
under  the  title  "  On  the  Dates  of  Professor  Cope's  Recent  Publications." 


c 


c.x|}ressivu  of  more  llian  one  genus,  in  the  light  that  Ciiriacus,  Capreohis, 
Blastocerus,  Axis,  Elaphus,  &c.,  are  distinct  from  Cervus.  Future  compari- 
sons and  discoveries  will  perhaps  reduce  the  nine  s|)ecies  of  the  five  genera 
wliich  have  been  indicated  to  the  number  of  two  or  three  species  of  one  or 
two  genera. 

Professor  Marsh  has  referred  the  remarkable  animals  above  indicated  to  a 
new  order  with  the  name  Dinocerata.  In  the  uncertainty  as  to  the  true 
ordinal  position  of  Uiutatherium,  I  have  allowed  it  to  remain,  according  to 
my  tirst  impression,  with  the  Proboscidea. 

UlNTATHEEIUM  ROBUSTUM. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  1G9,  iu  a  letter  addressed  to  the  Academy  and 
published  in  advance  of  the  proceedings,  August  1,  1872.  Keprint  ot  the 
letter  in  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  September,  1872,  239.  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  241. 
Cope:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873,  102;  Pr.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  1873.  Marsh:  Am. 
Jour.  Sc.  1873,  V,  290 ;  American  Naturalist,  January,  1873'. 

Uintamastiv  atrox.     Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  169 ;  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1872,  239. 

Binocems  mirabUls.  Marsh  :  Am.  Jonr.  Sc.  1872,  IV,  344,  published  iu  advance 
September  27,  1872;  ibid.  1873,  V,  117-123,  Plates  I,  II,  published  in  advance 
January  28,  1873;  Ibid.  April,  1873,  published  iu  advance  March  IS,  1873. 
American  Naturalist,  March,  1873,  140.    Nature,  March  13, 1873,  300. 

Uintathcrium  mirahile.  Cope :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873,  102 ;  Pr.  Am.  Phil.  Soc. 
1873,  published  iu  advance  "  On  the  Short-Footed  Ungulata  of  the  Eocene  of 
Wyoming,  March  14,  1873,  28." 

The  Figs.  6  to  12,  Plate  XXV,  Figs.  1  to  3,  Plate  XXVI,  and  Figs.  30  to  34. 
Plate  XXVII,  of  the  present  work,  represent  the  chief  type-specimens  upon 
which  the  genus  Uintatherium  was  founded  and  the  species  U.  robustum 
named.     Descriptions  of  these  occur  on  pages  93  and  96. 

The  large  canine  tooth  represented  in  Figs.  1  to  5,  Plate  XXV,  was,  on 
discovery,  supposed  to  belong  to  a  Drepanodon-like  carnivore.  The  dis- 
covery of  the  nearly  complete  skulls  described  by  Professor  Marsh  under  the 
name  of  Dlnoceras  ?nirabilis,  and  Professor  Cope  under  the  name  of  Loxolo- 
yhodon  cornutus,  leaves  no  doubt  that  the  remarkable  tooth  l)elongs  to  the 
same  kind  of  an  animal,  which,  from  the  proportions  of  the  specimen,  I  sup- 
pose to  be  Uintatherium  robustum. 

The  tine  skull  discovered  and  described  by  Professor  Cope  under  the  name 
of  Lo.rolophodon  cornutus,  I  had  the  opportunity  of  seeing  on  the  occasion 
when  it  was  exhibited  at  a  meeting  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences. 
So  fiir  as  I  could  judge  from  the  cursory  examination,  and  from  the  more 


334 

recent  description  and  figures  of  the  skull,  it  appears  to  me  to  be  a  larger 
s2)eciesof  Uintatherium  than  the  U.  rohustum,  l)ut  not  of  a  distinct  genus. 

The  remains,  which  were  first  noticed  by  Professor  Marsh  and  referred  to 
Titanotherium  (?)  anceps,  subsequently  to  Mastodon  anceps,  and  finally  to 
Tinoceras  anceps,  I  have  not  seen.  I  have  suspected  that  perhaps  they 
might  pertain  to  the  same  animal  as  that  I  have  described  as  Uintatlierium 
rohustum.  Should  this  prove  to  be  the  case,  as  the  specific  name  of  anceps 
is  of  earliest  date,  the  latter  woukl  be  correctly  designated  as  Uintatherium 
anceps. 

Professor  Marsh  regards  the  Eohasileus  s  Loxolophodon  cornutus,  Cope,  as 
pertaining  to  Tinoceras,  probably  T.  grandis,  Marsh,  (Am.  Jour.  Sc.  April, 
1873.)  On  the  other  hand  Professor  Cope  refers  Dinoceras  to  Uintatherium, 
and  also  includes  as  synonyms  Titanotherium  (?)  anceps,  and  therefore  Tinoceras, 
Marsh,  (Pr.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  1873.)  Thus  the  conjoint  views  of  these  authors 
rather  favor  the  idea  that  all  are  probably  of  the  same  genus. 

Since  the  article  on  Uintatherium  rohustuin,  page  96,  was  printed,  I  have 
attempted  a  restoration  of  the  skull  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  XXVIII,  on  an  enlarged 
outline  taken  from  Professor  Marsh's  Fig  1,  Plate  II,  of  Dinoceras  mirahilis, 
published  in  the  American  Journal  of  Science  for  February,  J  873.  The 
ci'anial  fragment  and  that  of  the  upper  jaw  with  the  last  molar  tooth  are 
taken  from  the  same  skull  as  the  specimens  of  Fig.  8,  Plate  XXV,  and 
Fig.  1,  Plate  XXVl.  The  canine  is  from  the  same  specimen  as  Fig.  1,  Plate 
XXV. 

In  the  May  number  of  the  American  Journal  of  Science  for  1873,  Pro- 
fessor Marsh  has  indicated  what  he  considers  to  be  a  new  species  of  Dinoceras 
with  the  name  of  Z>.  lucaris.  In  the  account  he  observes,  "  From  Uintatherium, 
so  far  as  that  genus  is  at  present  known,  Dinoceras  differs  in  the  jJosition  of 
the  occipital  condyles,  in  the  more  anterior  position  of  the  posterior  horns, 
and.  in  the  last  molar,  which  lacks  the  external  cone  between  the  two  trans- 
verse ridges,  and  has  a  second  small  tubercle  behind  the  posterior  ridge." 
These  characters  may,  perhaps,  together  with  others  more  important,  point 
to  a  different  species,  but  appear  hardly  sufficient  to  distinguish  a  genus. 
The  differences  are  also  more  apparent  than  real ;  for  instance,  the  so-called 
"external  cone  between  the  two  transverse  ridges"  of  the  last  molar,  as  seen 
in  Fig.  7,  Plate  XXV,  is  nothing  more  than  a  tubercle  produced  from  the 
basal  ridge,  might  be  absent  iu  another  individual,  and  is  actually  so  in  the 
molar  in  advance,  as  seen  in  Fig.  12  of  the  same  Plate. 


335 

MEGACE^OPS*  s.  Megacemtops. 
Megacerops  qoloradensis. 

Leidy :  Pt.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  1 ;  Haydeu's  Reii.  Geol.  Sur.  Wyomiug,  1871,  352. 
Megaceratops  color adoensis.    Cope:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873,  102;  Pr.  Am.  Phil. 
Soe.  1873. 

Described  page  239,  and  represented  by  Figs.  2,  3,  Plate  I,  and  Fig.  2, 
Plate  II. 

Before  the  discovery  of  the  more  characteristic  specimens  of  the  skulls  of 
species  of  Uiiitatheriuni,  from  the  nearer  resemblance  of  the  fossil  described 
under  the  name  of  Megacerops  to  the  corresponding  part  of  Sivatherium, 
the  animal  to  vvliicli  it  belonged  was  supposed  to  be  a  ruminant.  It  now 
appears  probable  that  Megacerops  forms  a  member  of  the  same  order,  what- 
ever that  may  l)e,  with  Uintatherium. 

Rodentia. 

SciURIDyE. 

PARAJHYS. 
Paramys  delicatus. 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,  231;  Ilaydeii's  Kep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana,  1872, 
357. 

Described  page  110,  and  represented  hy  Figs.  23  to  25,  Plato  VI.     From 

the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Paramys  delicatior. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871, 231 ;  Haydeu's  Rep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana,  1872,  357. 
Described  page  110,  and  represented  by  Figs.  26,  27,  Plate  VI,  and  Figs. 
16  to  18,  Plate  XXVII.     From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Paramys  delicatissimus. 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,  231 ;  Hayden'sEep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana,  1872,357. 
Described  page   111,  and  represented  by  Figs.  28,  29,  Plate  VI.     From 
the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

SCIUPtAVUS  ! 

Marsli :  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1871,  122. 
A  tooth  supposed  to  pertain  to  this  genus  is   described  on    page   113,  and 
represented  in  Fig.  30,  Plate  VI.     From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyo- 


*  For  the  sake  of  l)oth  brevity  and  euphony,  I  have  preferred  to  use  Jlegaccrops 
instead  of  Megaeeratoiis,  ju.st  as  Megatherium  is  preferred  toMegalolheriiun,  &c. 


336 

MuEIDiE.  (?) 

MYSOPS. 

Mysops  minimus. 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,  232;  Hayden's  Eep.  Gcol.  Sur.  Moutaua,  1872, 
357. 
Described  page  111,  and  represented  bj  Figs.  31,  32,  Plate  VI.     From  the 
Bridger  Eocene  of  AVyoming. 
Mysops  fkaternus. 

Described  page  112,  and  represented  by  Figs.  14,  15,  Plate  XXVII. 
From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Insectivora. 

FAMILIES  UNDETEKMINED. 
OMOMYS. 

Omomys  carteri. 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  18G9,  G3. 
Originally  described  in  the  Extinct  Mammalia  of  Nortli  America,  1S69, 
408,  and  represented  in  Figs.  13,  14,  Plate  XXIX  of  the  same  work. 
Redescribed  in  the  present  work,  120.     From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of 
Wyoming. 

PAL^ACODON. 

PALiEACODON  VERUS. 

Leidy  :  Pr.  .Ac  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  21 ;  Hayden's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana,  1872,  356. 
Described  from  specimens  of  teeth  page  122,  and  represented  by  Fig.  46, 
Plate  VI.     From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

WASHAKIUS. 

Washakius  insignis. 

Described  page  123  from  a  small  jaw-fragment  containing  the  last  two 
molars,  and  represented  in  Figs.  3,  4,  Plate  XXVII.  From  the  Bridger 
Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Sirenia. 
MANATUS. 

Makatlis  inoknatus. 

Figs.  16,  17,  Plate  XXXVII,  represent  the  crown  of  a  tooth  from  the 
"  phosphate  l>eds''   of   the   Ashley   River,   South   Carolina.     It   most  nearly 


337 


resembles  the  corresponding  part  of  the  lower  teetli  of  the  living  Manatee  of 
the  Florida  coast,  and  it  indicates  an  animal  of  about  the  same  size.  Tlie 
constituent  lobes  of  the  crown  are  less  contracted  approaching  the  summits, 
and  the  intervening  valleys  are  wider  than  in  the  teeth  of  the  living  Manatee. 
The  summits  of  the  lobes  being  less  contracted,  are  also  sliarper  and  not  so 
wrinkled.  The  summit  of  the  anterior  lobe  presents  a  wider  and  deeper 
oval  pit,  and  the  posterior  heel  is  less  mammillary,  not  wrinkled  at  the  sum- 
mit, and  is  broadly  sloping  at  its  fore  part.  The  crown  measures  half  an  inch 
four  and  aft  and  4J  lines  where  widest. 

Zeuglodontia. 

PONTOBASILEUS. 

PONTOBASILEUS    TUBERCULATUS. 

Fig.  15,  Plate  XXXVII,  represents  a  fragment  of  a  remarkable  tooth, 
apparently  belonging  to  an  animal  of  the  same  order  as  the  Basilosaurus. 
The  specimen  pertains  to  the  Museum  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
of  Philadelphia.  It  is  without  label,  and  was  associated  with  some  Basilosaurus 
remains  from  Alabama.  I  suppose  it  to  have  been  derived  from  some  Eocene 
or  Miocene  formation  of  the  Atlantic  States.  Upon  the  fang  there  are  the 
remains  of  two  white  disks,  apparently  the  basal  attachment  of  barnacles. 

The  fragment  consists  of  the  back  portion  of  the  crown  and  the  corre- 
sponding fang  of  a  double-fanged  tooth.  The  crown  has  been  very  unlike 
that  of  any  known  animal  of  the  order.  The  conical  summit  occupied  a 
position  over  the  separation  of  the  fangs,  including  at  most  the  anterior  one. 
The  back  part  of  the  crown  forms  a  wide,  thick  heel,  extending  over  more 
than  half  the  width  of  the  corresponding  faug.  The  enamel  is  exceedingly 
tuberculate,  and  near  the  most  prominent  portion  of  the  heel  outwardly  it  is 
worn  off  over  a  small  oval  space  from  attrition  of  an  opposed  tooth.  The 
fang  is  widely  divergent,  and  is  depressed  along  the  middle  externally  and 
internally,  and  also  more  deeply  on  the  surface  opposed  to  the  absent  fang. 

Cetncea. 
Delphinid^. 

GRAPHIODON. 
Graphiodon  vinearius. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  So.  1870,  122. 
An   extinct  genus  and   species  ol'  cetacean  animals,  apparently  dilFerent 
43  o 


338 

from  any  previously  described,  is  indicated  by  a  fossil  submitted  to  my 
examination  l^y  the  Smithsonian  Institution.  The  specimen  was  found  by 
Mr.  Pearce  in  the  Miocene  formation  of  Gay  Head,  Martha's  Vineyard.  It 
consists  of  a  tooth  represented  in  Fig.  7,  Plate  XXII,  of  the  natural  size. 

The  form  of  the  tooth,  with  its  huge  gibbous  fang,  led  me  at  first  to  mis- 
take it  for  that  of  a  mosasauroid  reptile,  nor  did  I  observe  my  error  until  it 
was  suggested  by  Professor  Marsh 

The  crown  of  the  tooth  is  curved,  conical,  and  without  subdivisional  planes 
upon  the  surface.  The  inner  and  outer  surfaces  are  barely  defined  i^ostero- 
internally  by  a  feeble  and  interrupted  ridge.  The  enamel  is  singularly 
wi-iukled,  the  wrinkles  being  short,  vermicular,  somewhat  branched  and 
crowded,  and  they  remind  one  of  Arabic  letters.  At  the  base  of  the  crown 
the  enamel  is  nearly  smooth.  The  transverse  section  of  the  crown  is  cir- 
cular, and  measures  8  lines  in  diameter.  The  length  of  the  crown  when 
complete  appears  to  have  been  about  twice  the  latter. 

The  fang  of  the  tooth,  broken  at  the  extremity,  exposes  to  view  a  large 
interior  pulp  cavity.  It  is  longer  than  the  crown  and  very  gibbous.  In  its 
relation  of  size  and  form,  it  is  wonderfully  like  the  corresponding  part  in  the 
teeth  of  Mosasaurus.  It  is  ovoidal  in  tbrm  and  is  curved  in  the  dii'ection  of 
the  crown.  It  is  abruptly  thickened  at  the  base  of  the  latter,  and  on  one 
side,  near-the  extremity,  exhibits  a  deep  groove.  The  texture  of  the  fang,  as 
seen  at  its  broken  part,  appears  as  dense  as  ordinary  dentine.  In  the  entire 
condition,  the  fang  has  approximated  2  inches  in  length ;  its  diameter  is 
about  half  the  length. 

REP T ILIA. 

Dinosauria. 

POICILOPLEURON. 

Deslongchamps :  Mem.  Soc.  Liu.  de  Normandie  VI,  1838,  37. 

POICILOPLEURON  VALENS. 

Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  3. 
Antrodemus.     Leidy  :  Ibidem,  4. 

Founded  on  several  fragments  of  vertebree  described  page  267,  and  rep- 
resented by  Figs.  16  to  18,  Plate  XV,  under  the  name  of  Antrodemus. 
From  Colorado,  and  supposed  to  have  been  derived  from  the  Cretaceous 
formation. 


339 
Chelonia. 

TESTUDINIDiE. 

TESTUDO. 

Testudo  Coesoni. 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,154;  1872,268;  Hayden's  Eep.  Geol.  Siir.  Mon- 
tana, 1872,  3GG. 

Emys  Carteri.  Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,  228;  Hayden's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur. 
Montana,  1872,  3G7. 

Described  page  132,  and  represented  in  Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  XT,  under  the 
name  of  Emys  Carteri ;  in  Fig.  7,  Plate  XV ;  Figs.  2  to  4.  Plate  XXIX, 
and  Figs.  1  to  4,  Plate  XXX.     From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Testudo  nebrascensis. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1852,  59 ;  Owen's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Wisconsin,  &c.  1852, 

567 ;  Ancient  Fauna  of  Nebraska,  1853,  103,  Plate  XIX ;  Ext.  Mam.  Fauna 

of  Dakota  and  Nebraska,  1869,  20. 
Stylemys  nebrascensis.     Leidy :  Pr.   Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1851,  172 ;  Ancient  Fauna  of 

Nebraska,  1853,  103 ;  Ext.  Mara.  Fauna  of  Dakota  and  Nebraska,  1869,  26. 

See  page  223.    Cope:  Ext.  Batracbia,  &c.  1870,  121. 
Emys  s.  Testudo  hemisjiherica,  Owciti,  Ciilbertsoni,  et  lata.    Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc. 

1851,  173,  327 ;  1852,  34,  59.     Owen's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Wisconsin,  &c.  1852, 

568  to  572;   Ancient  Fauna  of  Nebraska,  1853,  105  to  110,  Plates  XX  to 

XXIV. 
Stylemys  Gulbertsonii.    Cope :  Ext.  Batracbia,  &c.  1870,  124. 

Noticed  page  224  under  the  name  of  SUjlemys  nebrascensis,  ;iud  further 
represented  by  Figs.  7,  9,  10,  Plate  XIX. 

All  the  turtle  i-emains  from  the  Mauvaises  Terres  of  White  River,  Dakota, 
which  have  come  under  my  inspection,  and  which  have  been  described  under 
the  various  names  above  indicated,  I  regard  as  having  pertained  to  a  single 
species.  This  agrees  so  closely  in  the  usual  characters  of  living  species  of  the 
land  tortoises,  that  I  have  placed  it  in  the  same  genus,  though  it  is  subgeneri- 
cally  distinct.  A  mature  and  nearly  perfect  specimen  of  the  shell  in  the 
Museum  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences,  obtained  by  Professor  Hayden 
in  1866,  has  the  following  dimensions  : 

laches. 

Length  of  carapace  in  the  curve : 27 

Breadth  of  carai)ace  in  the  curve 26 

Length  of  plastron 20 

Breadth  of  plastrou 15 

Height  of  shell  above  the  level 8 


340 

Testudo  niobraeensis. 

Testiulo  (Stylcmys)  niohrarensis.     Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  185S,  29  ;  Ext.  Main. 

Fauua  Dakota  and  Nebraska,  1SG9,  20.     See  page  224. 
Stylemys  niohrarensis.     Cope :  Ext.  Batracliia,  &e.  1870,  124. 

Described  page  225,  under  the  name  of  Slylemys  niohrarensis,  and  repre- 
sented by  Figs.  4  to  (5,  Plate  III,  and  Figs,  fi,  8,  Plate  XIX.  *  From  the 
Pliocene  of  the  Niobrara  River. 

Testudo  okegonensis. 

Stylemys  oregonensis.     Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,  248.     See  page  225. 
Noticed   page   226,  under  the   name  of    Stylemys  oregonensis,  and  repre- 
sented by  Fig.  10,  Plate  XV.     From  the  Mioceiie  of  Oregon.     I  suspect 
I  have  been  too  hasty  in  regarding  this  as  a  species  distinct  from  Testudo 
nebrascensis. 

Emydidte. 

EMYS. 

Emys  wyomingensis. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  18G9,  G6 ;  Haydeii's  Kep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana,  1872,  367. 
Emys  Sfcvensonkmus.    Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  5 ;    Hayden's  Eep.  Geol. 
Sur.  Wyoming,  1871 ,  3GG. 

Umys  Jeanesi.    Leidy :    Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  123 ;  Haydeu's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur. 

Wyoming,  1871,  3GC. 
Umys  Haydeni.    Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  123 ;  Hayden's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur. 

Wyoming,  1871,  3GG. 

The  species  described  page  140,  and  represented  by  Figs.  2  to  6,  Plate 
IX,  Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  X.     From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Emys  peteolei. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  18GS,  17G.     Cope :  Ext.  Batraebia,  &c.  1870,  128. 
Species  described  page  260,  and  represented  by  Fig.  7,  Plate  IX.     From 
the  Quaternary  of  Texas. 

IIYBEMYS. 

IIyijemys  aeenakius. 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,  103. 
Noticed  page  174,  and  represented  by   Fig.  9,  Plate   XV.       From  the 
Bridger  P^ocene  of  Wyoming. 


341 

FAMILIES    UNDETERMINED,  APPARENTLY    INTERMEDIATE    TO    THE    PLEURODIRIDiE 

AND    THE    CHELYDRID/E, 

BAPTEMYS. 

Baptemys  wyomingensis 

Leicly :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  4 ;  Haydeu's  Ecp.  Geol.  Siir.  Wyomiilg,  1S71, 367 ; 

Haydeu's  Rep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montaua,  1872,  307. 
Adocus  injoiniDffeniih.      Cope:    Pr.  Am.  Piiil.  Soc.   1870,  297;  Ext.   Batracliia, 

Eeptilia  N.  Am.  in  Trau.s.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  1870,  233. 

Described  page  157,  and  represented  by  Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  XII,  and  Fig.  6, 
Plate  XV.     From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

CHISTERNON  s.  Chisternu?n. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  102. 

ChISTERNON  UNDATL'M. 

Baena  undata.  Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,  228 ;  Haydeu's  Rep.  Geol.  Sur. 
Montana,  1871,  3G9. 

Described  page  169,  and  represented  by  Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  XIV,  under  tlie 

name  of  Baena  undata.     From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of-  Wyoming. 

Chisternon  undatum,  in  the  presence  of  an  additional  pair  of  plates  to  the 

plastron,  resembles  the  existing  SternotliEerns. 

BAENA. 
Baena  arenosa. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870, 123 ;    1871,  228 ;  Hayden'.s  Rep.  Geol.  Snr.  Wyo- 
ming, 1871,  307  ;  Haydeu's  Rep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana,  1872,  308. 
Baena  affinis.    Leidy  :  Haydeu's  Rep.  Geol.  Sur.  Wyoming,  1871,  307. 

Species  described  page  161,  and  i-epresented  by  Figs.  1  to  3,  Plate  XIII, 

under  the  names  of  Baena  arenosa  and  Baena  affinis,  Figs.  1  to  5,  Plate 

.  XV,  and  Figs.  8,  9,  Plate  XVI. 

ANOSTEIRA. 

Anosteira  ornata. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871, 102, 114 ;  Haydeu's  Rep.  Geol.  Sur.  Wyoming,  1872, 
370. 

Described  page  174,  and  represented  by  Figs.  1  to  6,  Plate  XVI.     From 

the  Bridger  Eocene  of  AVyoniing. 

Trionychid^. 

TRIONYX. 

Trionyx  guttatus. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  18G9,  00 ;  1870,  5 ;  1871,  228 ;  Haydeu's  Rep.  Geol.  Sur. 
Wyoming,  1871,  367;  Haydeu's  Rep.  Geol.  Sar.  Montana,  1872,  370.  Cope: 
Ext.  Batracliia,  &c.,  1870,  152. 


'342 

Desci-ibed  page  176,  and  represented  by  Fig.  1,  Plate  IX.  From  the 
Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Trionyx  uintaensis. 

Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  267. 
Described  page  178,  and  represented  by  Fig.  1,  Plate  XXIX.     From   the 
Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Teionyx ? 

Fragments  descriljed  page  180,  and  represented  in  Figs.  11,  12,  Plate 
XVI.     From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

SPHAEGIDIDiE  1 

ATLANTOCHELYS, 

Atlantochelys  mortoni.* 

Agassiz :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1849,  169. 

Momsaurus  Mitchelli.     Leidy:  Cret.  Eept.  in  Siuitli.  Coiitrib.  1865,  43, 116.     De- 

termiuation  admitted  by  Cope:  Pr.  Bost.  Soc.  Nat.  Hist.  1869,  253. 
Protostega  neptunia.    Cope  ;  Pr.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  1872,  433. 

Fonnded  on  the  fragment  of  a  large  humerus  described  in  the  "  Cretaceous 
Reptiles  of  the  United  States,"  1865,  43,  and  represented  in  Figs.  3,  4, 
5,  Plate  VIII  of  that  work.  From  the  Cretaceous  green  sand  of  New 
Jersey.     See  page  270. 

Atlantochelys  tuberosus. 

Holcodus  acutidess.     lu  part  of  Leidy :  Cret.  Eept.  iu  Smiths.  Contrib.  18C5,  42, 

118.    Determination  admitted  by  Cope :  Pr.  Bost.  Soc.  Nat.  Hist.  1869,  253. 

Platecarpus  tympaniticus.     In  part  of  Cope :  Pr.  Bost.  Nat.  Hist.  Soc.  1869,  265 ; 

Syuop.  Est.  Batrachia,  Reptilia,  &c.  1870,  199. 
Protostega.     Cope:  Pr.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  1872,  433. 
Platecarpus  tuberosus.     Cope:  Pr.  Am.  Phil.  1872,  433. 
Protostega.  tuberosa.    Cope :   Hayden's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana,  1872,  330,  334. 

Founded  on  a  humerus  described  in  the  "Cretaceous  Reptiles  of  the 
United  States,"  1865,  42,  and  represented  in  Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  VIII  of 
that  work.  From  the  Cretaceous  formation  near  Columbus,  Mississippi. 
See  page  270. 

It  was  the  association  of  this  specimen  with  several  cervical  vertebras,  and 

*  Professor  Cope  observes  that  "this  name  was  unaccompanied  with  the  necessary 
description,  and  is  hence  useless  to  science."  (Pr.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  1872,  433.)  As  the 
specimen  on  which  it  was  founded  was  described  and  figures  in  my  paper  on  the  Cre- 
taceous Eeptiles,  so  as  to  be  recognized  by  every  student,  I  have  preferred  to  employ 
the  original  name  instead  of  the  proposed  substitute. 


343 

a  palatine  bone  with  teeth  of  an  nndoubted  niosasaiiroid,  that  led  me'^into  the 
error  of  snpposing  it  belonged  to  the  same  animal.  This  suggested  the  idea 
that  the  specimen  originally  referred  to  Atlantochelys  Mortoni  likewise  be- 
longed to  a  Mosasauriis.  The  error  was  easy  at  a  time  when  the  limb-bones 
of  none  of  the  mosasanroids  were  known,  ;uul  when  it  was  even  doubted 
whether  these  rejjtiles  possessed  hinder  lind)s.  My  determination  was  con- 
curred in,  not  only  by  Professor  Cope,  but  also  Ijy  Prcdessor  Agassiz,  after  I 
had  exhibited  to  him  the  different  specimens  and  their  associates.*  It  was 
only  after  I  had  had  the  opportunity  of  seeing  the  nearly  complete  fore-limbs 
in  the  skeleton  of  Clidastes  pro]iijthon,  described  by  Professor  Cope,  that 
I  suspected  my  reference  of  the  specimens  of  humeri  above  indicated  was 
incorrect. 

CYNOCERCUS? 

Cynocercus  incisus.  ■? 

Cope :  Pr.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  1872,  309. 

Remains  probably  belonging  to  this  species  described  page  2G9,  and 
represented  by  Figs.  17  to  21,  Plate  XXXVI.  From  the  Cretaceous 
of  Kansas. 

Mosasauria. 
MOSASAURUS  ? 

MOSASAURUS    % 

See  page  279.  Represented  by  Fig.  15,  Plate  XXXVI.  From  the  Cre- 
taceous of  Nebraska. 

TYLOSAURUS. 

Tylosaurus  dyspelor. 

Marsh :  Am.  Jour.  So.  1872, 147. 

Liodon  dyspelor.  Cope :  Pr.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  1870,  572,  574  ;  1871,  109,  280 ;  Hay- 
den's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Wyoming,  1871, 410 ;  Haydeii's  Rep.  Gcol.  Snr.  Montana, 
1872,  333. 

Rhinosaurus  dyspelor.     Mar.sh  :  Am.  Jour.  So.  1872. 

BUampliosaurus.     Cope :  Pr.  Ac.  iSTat.  Sc.  1872,  141. 

See  page  271.  Represented  by  Figs.  1  to  11,  Plate  XXXV.  From  the 
Cretaceous  of  New  Mexico  and  Kansas. 

*  I  do  not  introduce  the  names  of  these  naturalists  as  an  apology  for  my  error,  but 
rather  to  show  that  able  authorities  are  liable  to  the  same  mistaices  under  tlie  same 
circumstances. 


344 

Tylosaurus  peoriger. 

Marsh  :  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1872, 147. 

Macrosaurus  j)roriger.    Cope:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1869,  123. 

Liodon  proriger.     Cope:  Trans.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  1870,  202;  1871,  279;  Haydeu's 

Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Wyoming,  1871,  401 ;  Hayden's  Eep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana,  1872, 

333. 
Ehinosaitriis  jiroriger.     Marsh:  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1872. 
Ehampliosaurus.     Cope :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  141. 

See  page  274.     Represented  l)y  Figs.  12,  13,  Plate  XXXV,  and  Figs.  1  to 

m  the  Cretaceous  oi 

LESTOSAURUS. 


3,  Plate  XXXVI.     From  the  Cretaceous  of  Kansas. 


Lestosaurus  coryph^us. 

Maish :  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1872. 

Holcodus  corypliicus.    Cope :  Pr.  Am.  Phil.  Soc.  1871,  269 ;  Hayden's  Rep.  Geol. 

Sur.  Montana,  1872,  331 . 
f Platecarpns.    Cope:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  141. 

See  page  276.     Represented  by  Figs.  12  to  14,  Plate  XXXIV,  and  Figs. 
4  to  14,  Plate  XXXVI.     From  the  Cretaceous  of  Kansas. 

CLIDASTES. 

Cope  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1868,  2.33. 

Clidastes  intermedius. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  4.     Cope :    Syu.  Ext.  Batrachia,  Reptilia,  &c. 
1870,  221 ;  Hayden's  Rep.  Geol.  Sur.  Wyoming,  1871,  412. 

Described  page  281,  and  represented  by  Figs.  1  to  5,  Plate  XXXIV.     From 
the  Upper  Cretaceous  of  Alabama. 

Clidastes  affinis. 

G.  intermedius.    lu  part,  Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  4. 

Described  page  283,  and  represented  by  Figs.   6  to  11,  Plate  XXXIV. 
From  the  Cretaceous  of  Smoky  Hill  River,  Kansas. 

Lacertilia.- 

SANIWA  s.  Saniva. 

Saniwa  ensidens. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  124 ;  Hayden's  Rep.  Geol.  Sur.  Wyoming,  1871, 
368 ;  Haydeu's  Rep.  Geol.  Sur.  Montana,  1872,  370. 

Described  page  181,  and  represented  by  Fig.  15,  Plate  XV,  and  Fig_  3.5, 
Plate  XXVII.     From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 


Saniwa  major. 

Described  page  182,  and  represented  by  Fig.  14,  Plate  XV,  Figs.  36,  37, 
Plate  XXVII.     From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

CHAMELEO. 

ClIAMELEO  PRISTINUS, 

Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  277. 

Described   page   184,   and   represented  by  Figs.  38,   39,  Plate   XXVII. 
From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming 

G-LYPTOSAURUS. 

Marsh  :  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1871 ;  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1871,  105. 

Glyptosaurus 1 

Noticed  page  182,  and  represented  by  Fig.  13  to  17,  Plate  XVI.      From 
the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

TYLOSTEUS. 

Tylosteus  ornatus. 

Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  40. 

Noticed  page  285,  and  represented  by  Figs.  14,  Plate  XIX.     From  the 
Upper  Missouri ;  probably  Cretaceous. 

Sauropteri/gia. 
NOTHOSAURUS. 

NOTHOSAURUS    OCCIDUUS. 

Nothosaurops  occiduus.    LeiOy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  74. 

Noticed  page  287,  and  represented  by  Figs.  1 1  to  13,  Plate  XV.     From 
the  Cretaceous  1  of  Moreau  River,  Dakota. 

OLIGOSIMUS. 

■OlIGOSIMUS  GRANDiEVUS. 

Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  39. 

Described  page  286,  and  represented  hy  Figs.  18,  19,  Plate  XVI.     From 
the  Cretaceous  (?)  of  Wyoming. 
44  G 


FISHES. 

Teleostei. 

Labrid^. 

PROTAUTOGA. 
Protautoga  conidens. 

Tautoga  (Protautoga)  conidens.    Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  187.3,  15  ;  Am.  Jour.  Sc. 
1873,  312. 

A  short  time  since,  Mr.  C  M.  Smith,  engineer,  of  Richmond,  Virginia, 
submitted  to  the  writer,  for  examination,  a  small  collection  of  fossil  bones, 
which  had  been  discovered  by  him  during  the  construction  of  a  tunnel 
beneath  the  city.  Mr.  Smith  informs  me  that  the  material  penetrated  by 
the  tunnel,  in  which  the  bones  were  found,  consists  of  a  stiff  blue  clay  con- 
taining remains  of  infusoria.  Oh  examining  a  portion  of  the  substance  with 
the  microscope,  I  observed  an  abundance  of  well-preserved  frustules  of 
Coscinodiscus,  besides  many  other  less  conspicuous  diatomes. 

The  fossil  bones  consist  mainly  of  vertebrae  and  teeth  of  Cetaceans,  the 
teeth  of  Procamelus  virginietisis,  previously  described,  a  portion  of  a  humerus 
of  a  bird,  and  a  number  of  remains  of  fishes. 

Among  the  latter  there  are  two  specimens  which  consist  of  portions  of 
the  premaxillaries,  with  teeth,  represented  in  Figs.  56,  57,  Plate  XXXII,  of 
a  species  of  Tautoga  larger  than  the  living  black-fish,  Tautoga  americana. 

The  better-preserved  specimen  exhibits  the  base  of  attachment  of  the 
first  large  tooth,  and  succeeding  it  a  row  of  seven  teeth.  These  are  separated 
by  wider  intervals  than  the  fewer  teeth  of  the  same  kind  of  the  recent  black- 
fish.  The  points  of  the  teeth  are  more  regularly  conical  tlian  in  the  latter. 
Within  the  position  of  the  larger  teeth  there  is  a  row  of  small  teeth. 

The  second  specimen  contains  the  first  large  tooth  alone.  This  tooth  is 
not  longer  than  in  the  recent  bl^ck-fish,  but  is  more  robust,  and  its  enameloid- 
covered  extremity  is  more  perfectly  conical  or  is  less  flattened  from  without 
inwardly. 

The  premaxillary  bone  is  flatter  externally  than  in  the  black-fish,  and  looks 
as  if  it  had  not  turned  down  in  a  hook-like  end  as  in  the  latter.     The  speci- 


347 

mens  I  have  supposed  to  indicate  a  genus  closely  related  with    Tautoga,  and 
have  named  it  Protautoga. 

The  more  complete  specimen  contained  a  row  of  eight  teeth  in  a  space  of 
an  inch  and  a  quarter  from  the  symphysis.  The  first  large  tooth  is  5J  lines 
long:  the  crown-like  portion  is  3J  lines  long,  witli  the  breadth  at  base  2i 
lines.  The  second  tooth  is  4.4  lines  long;  the  crown-like  portion  is  2  lines 
long  and  1.6  lines  in  diameter  at  base.  The  other  teeth  range  from  2  lines 
to  a  line  in  length. 

SPHYEiENID^. 

ENCHODUS. 

Enchodus  Shumarui. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  ^^at.  Sc.  1856,  257. 
Described  page  289,  and  represented  by  Fig.  20,  Plate  XVII.     From  the 
Cretaceous  of  Sage  Creek,  Dakota. 

PHASGANODUS. 

Phasganodus  oirus. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1857,  107. 
Described,  page  289,  and  represented  by  Figs.  23,  24,  Plate  XVII.     From 
the  Cretaceous  of  Cannon  Ball  River,  Dakota. 

CLADOCYCLUS.  ? 

ClaDOCYCLUS  1  OCCIDENTALIS. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1856,  256. 
Noticed  page  288,  and  represented  by  Figs.  21,  22,  Plate  XVII,  and  Fig. 
5,  Plate  XXX.     From  the  Cretaceous  of  Sage  Creek,  Dakota. 

Clupeid^. 

CLUPEA. 

ClUPEA  HUMILIS. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1856,  256. 
Page   195,  and   represented  by  Fig.   1,  Plate  XVII.     From  the  Eocene 
shales  of  Green  River,  Wyoming. 

Clupea  alta. 

Described  page  196,  and  represented  by  Fig.  2,  Plate  XVII.     From  the 
Eocene  shales  of  Green  River,  Wyoming. 


348 

CyPRINIDyE. 

MYLOCYPRINUS. 

Mylocyprinus  robustus. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  70. 
Described  page   262,  and  represented  by  Figs.    11   to   17,   Plate   XVII. 
From  the  Pliocene  of  Idaho. 

SlLURID^. 

PIMELODUS. 

PiMELODUS  ANTIQUUS. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Xat.  Sc.  1873,  99. 
Page  193,  and  represented  by  Figs.  44  to  46,  Plate  XXXII.     From  the 
Tertiary  of  Big  Sandy  and  Green  Rivers,  Wyoming. 

FAMILY  UNDETERMINED. 

XiPIIACTINUS. 
XiPHACTINUS  AUDAX. 

■    Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  12. 
Described  page  290,  and  represented  by  Figs.  9,  10,  Plate  XVII.     From 
the  Cretaceous  of   Smoky  Hill  River,   Kansas,    and  L'eau  qui   Court 
County,  Nebraska. 

GANOIDEI. 

Cydoganoidei. 

AMIA. 

Amia  uintaensis. 

Amia  fProtamiaJ  uintaensis.    Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873,  98, 
Page  185,  and  represented  by  Figs.   1   to  6,   Plate  XXXII.     From    the 
Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 
Amia  media. 

Amia  fProtamiaJ  media.    Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873,  98. 
Page  188,  and  represented  by  Figs.  7   to   11,  Plate   XXXII.     From  the 
Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Amia  gracilis. 

Amia  fProtamiaJ  gracilis.    Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873,  98. 
Page  188,  and  represented  by  Figs.  23,  24,  Plate  XXXII.     From  the 
Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 


349 

HYPAMIA. 

Hypamia  elegans. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873,  98. 
Page  189,  aud  represented  by  Figs.  19  to  22,  Plate  XXXII.     From  the 
Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

FAMILY  UNDETERMINED. 

PIIAREODUS. 
Phaeeodus  acutus. 

Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873,  99. 
Page  193,   and  represented  by   Figs.  47  to   51,  Plate    193.      From  the 
Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Rliomhoganoidei. 

LEPipOSTEUS. 
Lepidosteus  atrox. 

Leidy':  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873,  97. 
Page  189,  and  represented  by  Figs.  14,   15,    Plate  XXXII.     From    tlie 
Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Lepidosteus ? 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873,  98. 
Page  190,  and  represented   by  Figs.  16,  17,  25,   27  to  30,  Plate  XXXII. 
From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Lepidosteus  simplex. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873,  98. 
Page    191,  and  represented  by   Figs.   18,   26,    31    to  43,  Plate  XXXIL 
From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

Lepidosteus  notabilis. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873,  98. 
Page   192,  and  represented   by  Figs.  12,  13,  Plate  XXXII.     From  the 
Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyoming. 

PYCNODUS. 

Pyc'nodus  faba. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872, 163. 
Described  page  292,  and  represented  by  Figs.  15,  16  Plate  XIX.     From 
the  Cretaceous  of  Mississip|)i  and  New  Jersey. 


350 

Pycnodus  robustus. 

Leitly :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1857,  168. 
Noticed  page  293,  and  represented  by  Figs.  18,  19,  Plate  XXXVII.     From 
the  Cretaceous  of  New  Jersey. 
Pycnodus  cauolinensis. 

Emmous:  North  Oaroliua  Geol.  Sur.  1858,  211,  Fig.  96. 
Noticed  page  294.     From  the  Miocene  of  North  Carolina. 

HADRODl^S. 

Hadijodus  priscus. 

Leitly :  Tr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1857,  167. 
Described  page  294,  and  I'epresented  by  Figs.  17  to  20,  Plate  XIX.     From 
the  Cretaceous  of  Mississippi.     Specimen   discovered  by   Dr.    William 
Spillman. 
Since  the  determination  of  the  reptilian  character  of   the  genus  Placodus, 
I  have  suspected  that  this  one  may  also  belong  to  the  same  order. 

Placoganoidei. 

ACIPENSER. 

AciPENSER    ORNATUS. 

Leid y  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1873, 15 ;  Am.  Jour.  Sc.  1873,  312. 
Among  the  fossils  in  Mr.  C.  M.  Smith's  collection  from  the  Miocene  forma- 
tion of  Virginia,  previously  mentioned,  there  is  a  dermal  plate  of  a  stur- 
geon, especially  interesting  on  account  of  tlic  rarity  of  the   remains  of 
fishes  of  the  same  family. 
The  specimen  is  represented  of  the  natural  size  in  Fig.  58,  Plate  XXXII, 
and  is  nearly  entire.     It  appears  to  have  been  one  of  the  lateral  plates,  and 
indicates  a  species  about  the  size  of  our  common  sturgeon  of  the  Delaware 
River.     Though  exhibiting  no  positive  distinctive  character,  it  most  probably 
pertained  to  a  species  now  extinct. 

ELASMOBRANCHI. 

Holocepliali. 

EDAPHODONTIDiE. 

EDAPHODON. 

Edaphodon  mirificus. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1856,  221. 
Described  page  306,  and  represented  by  Figs.  6  to  12,  Plate  XXXVII. 
From  the  Cretaceous  of  New  Jersey. 


351 
EUMYLODUS. 

EUMYLODUS   LAQUEATUS. 

Described  page  309,  and  represented  by  Figs.  21,  22,  Plate  XIX,  and  Figs. 
13,  14,  Plate  XXXVII.     From  the  Cretaceous  of  Mississippi. 

Plagiostomi. 

Squalid^. 

LAMNA. 
Lamna ? 


Described  page  304,  and  represented  by  Figs.  44,  45,  Plate  XVIII.    From 
the  Cretaceous  of"  Kansas  and  the  Chalk  of  England. 

Lamna  \ 


Described  page  304,  and   represented   by  Figs.  46   to  50,  Plate  XVIII. 
From  the  Cretaceous  of  New  Jersey,  Mississippi,  and  Kansas. 

OTODUS. 
Otodus  divaricatus. 

Leidy :   Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  1G2. 

Described  page  305,  and  represented  l)y  Figs.  26   to  28,  Plate  XVIII. 
From  the  Cretaceous  of  Mississippi. 

OXYRHINA. 

OXYEHINA   EXTENTA.  -  - 

Leidy  :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1872,  1G2. 

Described  page  302,  and  i-epresented  by  Figs.  21  to  25,   Plate  XVIII. 
From  the  Cretaceous  of  Kansas  and  Mississippi. 

GALEOCERDO. 

Galeocerdo  falcatus. 

Described  page  301,  and  represented  by  Figs.  29  to  43,  Plate  XVIII. 
From  the  Cretaceous  of  Kansas,  Mississippi,  Texas,  and  England. 

Hybodontid^. 

CLADODUS. 

Cladodus  occidentalis. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1859,  3. 

Cladodus  mortifer.       Newberry  aud  Wortben  :    Geo].  Sur.  Illinois,  vol.  ii,  Pake- 

outology  22,  Plate  I,  Fig.  5.     St.  Jobu:    Haydeu's  Rep.  Geol.  Sur.  Nebraska, 

1872,  239,  Plate  IH,  Fig.  6;  Plate  VI,  Fig.  13. 


Described  paifc  311,  and  represented  .l)y  Figs.  4  to  6,  Plate  XVII.    From 
the  Carboniferous  formation  of  Kansas,  Nebraska,  and  Illinois. 

CESTRACIONTIDiE. 

ACRODUS. 

ACKODUS    HUMILIS. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1S72,  103. 
Described  page  300,  and   re|irescntc(l   by   Fig.  5,  Plate  XXXVII.     From 
the  Cretaceous  limestone  of  New  Jersey. 

AcEODUS  Emmonsi. 

Leidy  :  Pr.  xVc.  Nat.  Sc.  1S72,  103. 

Acroclus.    Emmous:  North  Carolina  Geol.  Sur.  18.58,  211,  Fig.  97. 

Attributed  by  Professor  Emmons  to  the  Miocene  of  North  Carolina. 

PTYCHODUS. 
Ptyohodus  Mortoni. 

Agas.siz:  PoIssods  Fossiles  III,  1833-'43,  158,  Tab.  25,  Figs.  1  to  3;  copied  in 
Figs.  773,  773rt,  of  Dana's  Manual  of  Geology.  Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1808, 
205. 

Palate-boiie  of  a  fish  ?  Morton  :  Syn.  Org.  Rem.  Cret.  Group,  1831,  Plate  XVIII, 
Figs.  1,  2. 

Described    page  295,  and    represented   by  Figs.   1  to  14,   Plate  XVIII 
From  the  Cretaceous  of  Kansas,  Mississippi,  and  Alabama. 

Ptychodus  occidentalis. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1868,  207. 
Described  page  298,  and  represented  by  Figs.  7,  8,  Plate  XVII,  and  Figs. 
15  to  18,  Plate  XVIII.     From  the  Cretaceous  of  Kansas. 

Ptychodus  Whippleyi. 

Marcou :  Geology  North  America,  1858,  33,  Plate  I,  Fig.  4. 
Described    page  300,  and    represented    by   Figs.    19,    20,    Plate  XVIII. 
From  tlie  Cretaceous  of  Texas. 

Ptychodus  polygykus. 

Agassiz :  Poissous  Fossiles  III,  1833-'43,  150.  Dixon  :  Geol.  Sussex,  1850,  363. 
Gibbes:  Jour.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1810,  290,  Plate  XLII,  Figs.  5,  0.     Leidy:  Pr.  Ac. 

Nat.  Sc.  1808,  208. 

From  the  Cretaceous  of  Alabama. 


PF/rALODUS. 

PeTALODUS    ALr.EGHANIENSlS. 

Leidy:   Jour.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  ISoG,  101,  riato  XVI,  Figs.  4  to  G;    Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc. 

1859,  3. 
tVcariun  cxtinvtus.     Leidy:  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1855,  411. 
Petalodus  destructor.     Newberry  and  Wortbeii :    tied.  Stir,  llliuois,  vol.  ii,  I'al- 

iBontology  35,  Plate  II,  Figs.  1  to  .'!.      St.  John :    Haydeu's  Eei).  Geol.  Sur. 

Nebraska,  1872,  241,  Plate  III,  Fig.  5. 

Described  page  312,  and  represented  by  Fig.  3,  Plate,  XVII.  From  the 
Carboniferous  formation  of  Kansas,  Nebraska,  Iowa,  Illinois,  and  In- 
diana. 

Ichthyodorulites. 

XYSTRACANTHUS. 

Xystracanhus  arcuatus. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1859,  S.- 
Page 312,  and  represented  by  Fig.  25,  Plate  XVII.     From  the  Carbonif- 
erous formation  of  Kansas. 

'asteracanthus. 

Asteracanthus  siderius. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  13. 

Described  page  313,  and  represented  by  Fig.  59,  Plate  XXXII.  From 
the  sub-Carboniferous  formation  of  Tennessee. 

Rai.^:. 

ONCOBATIS. 

Oncobatis  pentagonus. 

Leidy :  Pr.  Ac.  Nat.  Sc.  1870,  70. 
Page  264,  and  represented  by  Figs.  18,  19,  Plate  XVII.     From  the  Plio- 
cene of  Sinker  Creek,  Idaho. 

TRYGON. 

Trygon  . 

Indicated  Ijy  the  Ijasal  portion  of  a  caudal  spine,  represented  in  Figs.  54, 

55,  Plate  XXXII.     It   resembles  the  corresponding  ])ortion  of  the  caudal 

spines  of  our  common  whip-sting  ray,  Pastinaca  hastata,  and  would  appear 

to  have  pertained  to  a  species  of  about  the  same  size.     Tlie  anterior,  shining, 

45  G 


354 

eiiaiueloid  surface  is  strongly  wrinkled  longitudinally,  and  the  lateral  denticles 
are  directed  downward. 

From  the  Miocene  formation  of  Virginia.  Specimen  discovered  by  Mr.  C. 
M.  Smith  in  the  blue  clay  beneath  the  city  of  Richmond. 

MYLIOBATES. 

Myliobates  . 

Indicated  by  the  basal  portion  of  a  caudal  spine,  represented  in  Figs.  52, 
53,  Plate  XXXII.  In  its  relation  of  breadth  to  length,  in  comparison  with 
flic  spines  of  ordinary  rays,  it  would  appear  in  the  couiplete  condition  to 
have  been  upward  of  8  inches  in  length.  The  specimen,  however,  becomes 
rather  more  abruptly  narrowed  at  its  upper  broken  extremity  than  appears  in 
ordinary  spines,  so  that  it  may  have  been  proportionately  shorter  than  usual. 

The  transverse  section  has  almost  the  Greek  e  form.  In  front  the  spine 
is  concave  along  the  middle  and  convex  at  the  sides  ;  behind  it  has  the 
reverse  arrangement.  The  lateral  denticles  are  directed  downward  and 
backward.  The  anterior  enameloid  surface  is  strongly  wrinkled  along  the 
middle  groove,  but  not  so  much  at  the  sides,  except  at  the  'base  of  the  spine. 
The  posterior  surface  is  moderately  ridged. 

Specimen  fonnd  with  the  preceding  in  the  blue  clay  of  the  Miocene  forma- 
tion of  Virijinia.     From  Mr.  C.  M.  Smith. 


INDEX. 


[Synonyms  aro  in  italic.'] 


Page. 

Acanthopteri 288 

Acipenser  ornatus i  350 

Acrodus 300,352 

Emmonsi 301,352 

Immilis 300,  352 

Adociis  I'liomingensis 341 

AgriochoBrus  antiquus 216,  319 

latifrons 216,319 

Amia 185,348 

gracilis 188,348 

media 188,348 

uintaeusis 185,348 

Anchippodus 328 

riparius 72, 328 

vetulns 329 

Anchitlieridse 322 

Aucliitlierinm 218, 250, 322,  323 

agreste ...^,.  251,323 

australe 250,323 

Bairdi 218,252,322 

Condoui 218 

Anosteira  oruata 174, 341 

AutbracotlieridsB 320 

Antrodanus 338 

Apatoruis 266 

Arclia'otlieyiiim 320 

Artiodactyla 216,317 

Asineops  squamifrons 195 

vii'idensis 195 

Asteracauthus  siderius 313,353 

Atlantocbelys  Mortoni 269, 342 

tnberosus 342 

Aucbenia 255,  317 

californica 255 

hesterna : 255,317 

B. 

Ba€na 160,341 

affinis 163,341 

areuosa 161,341 

uiidata 1()9, 341 

Baptemys 154,341 

wyomingensis 157,  341 

Bison  latifrons 253,  318 

Buvidie 318 

C.   , 
C'anida; 315 

C'anis  indianensis 230,315 


Pago. 

Canis  primwrus „ 315 

vafer 315 

CamelidiB 317 

Carnivora 114,227,315 

Cervidse 317 

Cestraciontidfo 352 

Cetacea 337 

Cbameleo  pristinus 184,345 

Cbclouia 132,223,260,269,339 

Cbisternon  undatnm 169,  341 

Chisternum .-..  341 

Cladocyclus  occideutalis    288, 347 

Cladodus  occidentalis 311, 351 

mortifir 312,  351 

Clidastes 281,344 

affinis 283,344 

intermedins 281, 344 

Clupea 195,347 

alta .- 196,347 

bnmilis 195,347 

pusilla 195 

Clnpeidse 347 

Corax  Iwterodon 301 

Crocodilia 125 

Crocodilns 125 

aptns 126 

Elliotti 123 

Cycloganoidei 348 

Cynocercus 343 

incisus 269,343 

Cypriuidai 262,348 

D. 


DeliJbiuidte 

Dicotyles 

hesperins 
liristinns. 

Dinoceras 

bxcnstris  .. 

bicaris 

miraliilis  .. 

Dinosanria 


337 

216,319 

217 

216,319 

232 

95 

334 

.95,108,332,333 
267,338 


Edaiibodon  mirilions. 

Edapbodoutidiu 

Elasmobraucbi 

Elepbas 

americanu.s. . 

Cohimhi 


306, 350 
350 
295, 350 
238, 329 
238, 329 
238, 329 


356 


Page. 

Klepbas  imporator 329 

Texanus 329 

KlotbtTinm 124,217,320 

iraperator 217,320 

ingens 320 

leutis 124 

Mortoui 125, 320 

supeibum 218 

Emys 140,260 

Carterl ' 137,339 

Haydeni 140, 14&,310 

Jeansi 140,143,340 

petrolei 260,340 

Stevensoniaiiiis 140,141,340 

wyomiugeusis 140, 141,  340 

Enchodus  Shniiiardi 289, 347 

Entdodon 320 

Eobasileus 332,334 

Equiila; 321 

Equiis " 242,321 

conqilicatiis 244,  321 

excelsiis 243,322 

major 244,321 

occidentalis 242,322 

pacificiis 322 

parvuliis 252,  323 

Ei'ismatopterus  levatiis 195 

Eickseckeri 195 

Eitcrotaph  us 212 

Euelephas  Cohmibi 330 

Jacksoiii , 330 

Eumjlodus  laqueatiis 309, 351 

F. 

Felida; 315 

Felis  aiigustus 227, 315 

imperialis 228,315 

Fisbes 184,261,288,346 

G. 

Galeocei'do  falcatus 301, 351 

Gauoidei 292,348 

Glyptosaurus 182,  345 

ocellatiis 183 

Grapbiodon  viucariiis 337 

H. 

Hadrodiis  priscus 294, 350 

Hadrobyus  supremos 222,  321 

Hippariou  speciosum 247,  322 

Hipposyus  formosus 91,  321 

robustior 93,  32 1 

Uolcodus  acutiiJens 342 

corjipluviis 276,  34  4 

Holocepbali 306, 350 

Hybeniys  arenariiis 174,340 

Hybodoutidic 351 

Hyopsiidiis 75, 320 

niiunscuhis    81, 320 

pauUis 75,  320 


Page. 

Hypaiuia  elegaus J89, 349 

Hyraebyus 59,327 

agrarius (jO,  327 

«grcstis 00,  327 

eximius g6,  327 

modestus 67,327 

nanus 67,327 

I. 

Icbtbyodorulitcs 353 

Icbtbyoruis 266 

lusectivora ■ 120  336 


L. 

Labrid.T 

Lacenilia 180, 

Laniu  a 

cuspidata 

elegans 

Texana  

Lefalofodon 

Lepido.stens 189, 

atrox 

notabilis 

simplex 

Leptomcryx  Evausi 

Lestosanrus  corypbajus 

lAmnoliyus 

Icevidens 

latieeps 

rohustus  

Limnolhmum  elegans 

Limnotlierium  tyraimus 

lAodon  dyspelor 

proriger 

Lophiodon 

Bairdiaiius 

modcstus 

nanus 

occidentalis 

parisiense 

Lopbiotherium    . . ; 

Ballardl 

sylvaticnni 

Loxoloplwdon 


Lutra . 


l>iscinaria  . 


346 
, 285, 344 
303, 351 
305 
305 
305 
332 
, 190, 349 
189, 349 
192, 349 
191,349 
216,317 
276,  344 
57, 323 
323, 325 
326 
326 
84, 320 
83,89 
271,343 
344 
219, 327 
60,  327 
67, 327 
68, 327 
220, 327 
98 
69,  327 
71 
.09,327 
332,  333 
230, 316 
316 


JI. 


Macrosaurus  proriger 340 

Jlabicopteri 294 

Mammalia :... 27, 199,211,227,  315 

Manatus  iuornatus 336 

Mastodon 231,330 

amcricaniis 237,  330 

anccps 94, 334 

mirificii.s 237, 330 

(ib.scunis 231,330 

Shcpardi 2.35, 330 


3.07 


Pago 

Megacerops 2a9, 335 

coloradensis 239, 335 

Mcgaceratops  coloradoeiisis 335 

Megalomenyx 2G0 

niobrarensts 260,  317 

Mery cbippus 248, 322 

mirabilis 250,  322 

Muiycbyus 202 

elegaus 201 

major 201 

medius 201 

Merycodus  uecatiis 318 

Meryeochttius 199, 202, 208, 319 

proprius 201 

rusticns 199,  319 

Miacis 310 

Microsus  cuspidatiis 81,  322 

Mierosyops 82,  320 

elegaus 8-1, 320 

gracilis 83, 320 

Mosasauria 270, 343 

Mosasaurus 279, 343 

Mitchein 342 

Murida?. ,  336 

Mustelid* 310 

Myliobates 353 

My locyprinus  robiistus 262, 348 

Mysops Ill,  336 

frateruus 112, 336 

minimus Ill,  330 

N.     . 

Notluirclus  rohusliof 93, 321 

Notbarctus  teuebrosus 86, 329 

Kolhijsaiin)2>s  occidmis 287,345 

Notbosaiirus  occiduus 287, 345 

O. 

Omni  vora 319 

Omomys  Carter! 120,  336 

Oucobatis  pentagouus 264, 353 

Oligosimus  graudaivns.. 286,345 

Oreodontidse  .  , 318 

Oreodon 201,211,318 

affinis 212 

bullatus 212,318 

Cnlbertsoiii 211,318 

gracilis 211 

bybridiis 212 

major 211 

occidentalis 3]  8 

snperbu/* 211,319 

Osteoglossum  encaustum 195 

Otodus  divaricatns 305,  351 

Oxyrbiua 302, 303,  351 

extenta 302,  351 

P. 

Palajacodoii 122,  336 

venis 122,  336 


raso. 

Pal;cosyops 27,323 

biimilis 58,326 

Junius 57, 326 

jiiiiioy 326 

laliapf! 325,326 

major 45,326 

minor 72, 328 

paludosus 28, 325 

Palaucbeuia  magna 255 

Paramys 109, 335 

delicatior 110,335 

delicatissimus Ill,  335 

delicatus 110, 335 

Patriofelis  ulta 114, 316 

Perissodactyla 27,219,321 

Petalodus  allegbanieusis 312,  353 

destructor 313,  353 

Pbareodus  acutus 193, 349 

Pbasgauodus  dirus 289, 347 

Pimelodus  antiquus i 193,  348 

Placoganoidei 350 

Plagiostomi 295,311,351 

Platecarjms 342, 344 

tuherosiis 342,  344 

tympaniticus 342 

Platygonus  Coudoni 217 

Poicilopleuron  Buclilaudi 268 

valeus 267,338 

Polycotylus  latipinnis 279 

Pontobasileus  tuberculatus 337 

Proboscidea 93, 231,  329 

Procamelus  occidentalis 258, 317 

niobrarensis 317 

robustus 258,  317 

yirginiensis 259,317 

Protamia 185,348 

Protautoga  conidens 346 

Protocamehis ..'. 317 

Protobippus 248,322 

perditus 249,250,322 

idaeidus 248,322 

Protostega  gigas 269 

inptiiiiia 342 

tiilnro!ia 269,  342 

Ptycbodus  Morton  i 295,352 

occidentalis 298,352 

polygyrus 352 

Wliipployi 300,352 

Pycnodus 292,349 

carolincnsis 294,350 

faba 292,349 

robustus 293,350 

It. 

Eal:r  264,353 

Reptilia 125,338 

Kcptilcs 267 

lihaniphosauriis 271,343,344 

Rbinoceros 220,328 

anncctaus 328 


358 


Ehiuoceros  hesi>eii us 

occidciitalis 

oregoueuiiis 

jjaciflcus 

Uhinosaurns    

d!/8j)elor 

proriger 

Ehomboganoidei 

Ebyucbothei'inm 

Rodenti.a 

Enminantia - 199, 2U, 

S. 

Saniva  

Saniwa  ensideus 

major 

Sauropterygia ■ 

Sciuravus 

nitidus 

undans 

Scinridie 

Sicarius  exiinctus 

SiluridoB - 

Sinopa 

eximia 

rapas  

Sirenia  

Soliduugiila 208,218; 

SpliargididjB 

Sphy  rsBuidio 

SqualidiB 

Styleniys 

Culbertso7ii 

otrgonensis 

nchrascensis 

niohrarfiisis 


Page. 

2ii0,  328 

328 

328 

221,  328 

271 

343 

344 

349 

237, 330 

109, 335 

953,317 


Suidse 


181, 344 

181,344 

181,  345 

286,  345 

113,  335 

113 

113 

335 

353 

290, 348 

11(3,316 

118,316 

116,316 

336 

242, 321 

342 

288, 347 

351 

223 

339 

226, 340 

224. 339 

225. 340 
319 


Page. 

Testudo  Culberlsoiii 339 

hemisjjherica 339 

lala 339 

nebrasceusis 339 

niobrareusis 340 

oregouensis 340 

Tetralophodon  mirifictis 330 

Tylosaunis  dyspelor 271, 343 

jiroriger 274, 344 

Tylosteiis  ornatus 285, 345 

Tinociras 331 

aneeps 94, 334 

grandis 94,334 

Titaiiolhei'inm  aneeps 94, 334 

Triacodou  falax 123 

Triouyebidaj 341 

Trioujx 176, 180,  341 

guttatus 176, 341 

iiintacusis 178,342 

Trogosus  castoridens 71, 32S 

vclulus 75, 329 

Tiygon 353 

U. 

Uintacyou  edax 118, 310 

vorax 120,316 

Uintamastix 331 

atrox 94, 107, 333 

Uintatherium 93,331 

aucep.s 334 

nuruhile  . 333 

robustiim 93,96,333 


Tautoga 346 

Teleostel 288,346 

Tdmatheiium 323 

Testudinida* 339 

Testudo  Corsoni 132, 339 


Vnlpavus  palustris 


118 


W. 


Wasbakius  iusignis ._ 123,  336 

X. 

Xiphactiiius  audax 290,348 

Xystracautbus  arcuatns 312, 353 

Z. 

Zeuglodontia .      337 


EXPLANATION    OF    PLATE    I. 


Fig.    1.  Oreodon  supeebus: 

A  side  view  of  a  skull,  witli  the  base  of  tbe  cranium  iuvested  in  tlie  matrix.     Specimen  ob- 
tained by  Rev.  Thomas  Condon  on  John  Day's  River,  Oregon.     One-half  the  natural  size. 

Figs.  2,3.   MEGACfiROPS   COI.ORADENSIS : 

Fig.  2.  Upper  view  of  the  nasal  extremity  of  the  face  with  a  pair  of  horn-cores.    Oue-half 

the  natural  size. 
Fig.  3.  Front  view  of  the  same  specimen 


U.  S.  Geological  SuTvay  of  the  Temtoneo. 


Plate  I 


T     SINCLAIR  ft  SON.  PHILADELPHIA. 


OR,EODON  SUPERBUS.  % 


2    %    MEGACEROPS  COLOR/ DENSI3    '^ 


EXPLANATION    OF    PLATE    II. 


Fig.     1.   LOPHIODON  OREGOXENSIS  : 

Two  upper  molar  teeth,  much  worn  and  seen  on  theii-  triturating  surfaces.  Specimen  from 
Bridge  Creek,  Oregon.    Natural  size. 

Fig.    2.  Megacekops  coloradensis  : 

Side  view  of  the  same  specimen  as  that  of  figures  2,  3,  of  Plato  I.    One-half  the  natural  size. 

Figs.  3,  4.  Elotherium  superhuji  : 

Fig.  3.  Portion  of  a  lower  canine  tooth,  natural  size.     From  Bridge  Creek,  Oregon. 
Fig .  4.  Crown  of  an  anterior  premolar,  natural  size.     From  John  Day's  River,  Oregon. 

Fig.    5.  A^■c•HrrIIERIUM  Condoni  : 

A  mutilated  upper  molar  tooth,  natural  size.     From  Oregon. 

Figs.  6,7.  Rhinoceros  pacificus: 

Fig.  6.  An  upper  molar  seen  on  the  triturating  surface,  natural  size.    From  Alkali  Flats, 

Oregon. 
Fig.  7.  An  upper  last  premolar,  seen  on  the  triturating  surface,  natural  size.    From  Alkali 

Flats,  Oregon. 

Figs.  8,9.  Rhinoceros  hesperius(?)  : 

Fig.  8.  An  upper  last  molar,  seen  on  the  triturating  surface,  natural  size.     From  the  Condon 

collection  of  Oregon. 
Fig.  9.  An  inferior  molar,  seen  on  the  triturating  surface. 

Fig.    10.  Patriofelis  ulta: 

Portion  of  the  right  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw,  half  the  natural  size.  It  contains  the  remains 
of  five  teeth  behind  the  position  of  the  canine.  From  near  Fort  BriJger,  Wyoming.  See 
page  114. 

Figs.  11,  12.  Hyrachyus  agrarius  : 

Fig.  11.  Left  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw,  one-half  the  natural  size.  Specimen  obtained  by 
Professor  Hayden  on  Smith's  Fork  of  Green  River,  Wyoming. 

Fig.  12.  Portion  of  the  left  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw  of  a  young  animal,  natur.il  size.  It  con- 
tains the  temporary  series  of  teeth  behind  which  the  first  of  the  true  molars  is  inclosed 
within  the  jaw.     From  Black's  Fork  of  Green  River.    Hayden's  collection. 

Fig.    13.  Hyrachyus  modestus  : 

A  first  or  second  upper  molar  of  the  left  side,  slightly  larger  than  natural.  From  Smith's 
Fork  of  Green  River.    Hayden's  collection. 

Fig.    14.  Hyraohy'US  nanus  : 

Portion  of  left  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw,  with  two  premolars  and  the  three  molars,  natural 
size.     Obtained  by  Dr.  Joseph  K.  Corson  from  Grizzly  Buttes. 

Fig.    15.  Diseased  calcaneura  (hyperostosis)  of  Merycochcerus   uusticus.     From  Sweetwater  River. 
Hayden's  collection  of  1H70. 

Fig.    IG.  Oreodon  superbus  : 

Portion  of  right  ramus  of  lower  jaw,  with  the  three  premolars  and  first  molar;  natural  size. 
Condon  collection  of  Oregon  fossils. 


D     b    G.eological  Survey  of  the  TerntorieB 


Plate  ri 


1 


*fci»^ ";  ,'Sa»= 


u 

m 


\-\ 


13 


p^# 


^*^^^«-4,.^4^ 


;^. 


X 


/^ 


T-  StNCW/'H  A  SON     ^■■^lLA^:>ELPMIA 


1  LOPHIODCN. 

2  MEGACEROPo.  -^ 


S.  4    ELOTHERIUM.      1 6-9    RtllNOCEROS 
S    ANCHr)'Hl;;RirMj      10.  PATRIOFELLi 
16    OREODON. 


il-hi    HfRACHY'ie 

i&    iVlERYCOCaCERaS 


EXPLANATION    OF   PLATE    III. 


Figs.  1-3.  Merycochcerus  rusticus.  Figures  of  the  natural  size.  Specimeus  from  Sweetwater  River, 
Wyoming.     Hayden's  collection  of  1870. 

Fig.  1.  Upper  jaw,  with  a  nearly  complete  series  of  teeth,  the  last  molar  introduced  from 
another  specimen. 

Fig.  2.  Front  view  of  the  same  specimen,  exhibiting  the  high  alveolar  border  and  the  nar- 
row nasal  orifice. 

Fig.  3.  Lower  jaw,  witli  a  full  series  of  molar  teeth. 

Fig.   4-6.  Testudo  or  Stylbmvs  niobrarensis.    Figures  of  the  natural  size,  except  Figure  6,  which  is 
one-half  the  size  of  nature.    From  the  Niobrara  River.     Ilaydeu's  collection  of  1857. 
Fig.  4.  Internal  view  of  the  fore-part  of  the  plastron. 
Fig.  .5.  The  last  vertebral  and  the  pygal  plates. 

Fig.  6.  Internal  view  of  a  posterior  portion  of  the  carapace,  exhibiting  the  costal  capitula, 
and  the  processes  for  conjunction  with  the  pelvic  girdle. 


U.    S.    Geological  Sur-vey  oC  the  Terntonec 


Plato  III. 


.  SINOLAIB  *  BON.  PMlUAOtCPHIA 


]-S    MERYCOCHOERUS  RUSTICU3.  |  4-6.  STYL£.M^S  NIOBRARENSIS. 


EXPLANATION    OF   PLATE    IV. 


Figures  all  of  the  natural  size.     Specimens  all  from  the  Bridger    tertiary  formatiou  of 
Wyoming. 

Figs.  1-8.  Pal/EOsyops  paludosus: 

Fig.  1.  A  mutilated  upper  canine  of  the  supposed  female,  from  the  same  individual  as  the 

specimens  of  figures  5-8. 
Fig.  2.  Mutilated  canine  of  the  supposed  male,  from  the  specimen  of  the  following. 
Fig.  3.  A  complete  series  of  molar  teeth  aud  the  mutilated  canine  of  the  left  side  of  a  fine 

specimen  discovered  at  Grizzly  Buttes  by  Dr.  J.  Van  A.  Carter.    View  of  the  triturating 

surfaces,  partially  worn,  of  the  molar  teeth ;  from  a  supposed  male. 
Fig.  4.  Outer  view  of  the  crowns  of  the  same  molar  series. 
Fig.  5.  A  complete  series  of  molar  teeth,  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  ou  Henry's  Fork  of  Green 

Kiver.    View  of  the  triturating  surfaces;   more  worn  than  in  the  preceding  specimen. 

From  a  supposed  female.  . 

Fig.  G.  Quter  view  of  the  anterior  two  premolars  of  the  same  specimen. 
Fig.  7.  A  third  upper  premolar,  left  side.     Specimen  from  Henry's  Fork.     Hayden's  coUec- 

tiou  of  1870. 
Fig.  8.  Lateral  view  of  an  upper  incisor.     Specimen  probably  from  the  same  individual  as 

that  of  Fig.  5. 

Figs.  0-18.  Hyrachyus  agrarius  : 

Fig.  9.  Outer  view  of  the  crowns  of  an  upper  series  of  molar  teeth. 

Fig.  10.  View  of  the  triturating  surfaces  of  the  same  teeth.    From  a  specimen  discovered  by 

Dr.  Carter  near  the  Lodge-pole  trail,  eleven  miles  from  Fort  Bridger.    All  the  teeth  con- 

.siderably  worn. 
Fig.  11.  An  upper  second  true  molar,  left  side.    Found  by  Dr.  Carter  on  Henry's  Fork  of 

Green  River. 
Fig.  12.  An  upper  last  premolar,  left  side,  but  little  worn.     Specimen  found  by  Dr.  Joseph 

K.  Corson  at  Grizzly  Buttes. 
Fig.  13.  A  iJortion  of  the  lower  jaw;  from  the  same  individual  as  Figs.  9,  10.     It  contains 

part  of  the  lateral  incisor,  the  canine,  and  the  premolars. 
Fig.  14.  View  of  the  triturating  surfaces  of  the  premolars,  from  the  same  specimen. 
Fig.  15.  Outer  view  of  a  second  lower  molar,  from  the  same  individual. 
Fig.  16.  Triturating  surface  of  the  same  specimen. 
Fig.  17.  An  upper  canine,  found  at  Grizzly  Buttes  by  Dr.  Corson. 
Fig.  18.  A  lower  iucisoi,  from  the  same  individual  as  Fig.  13. 

Figs.  19,  20.  Hyeaciiyus  exijiius.     Specimen  found  by  Dr.  Carter  on  Henry's  Fork  of  Green  River. 

Fig.  19.  Fragment  of  the  left  side  of  the  lower  jaw,  containing  the  last  premolar  and  tho 

greater  part  of  the  tirst  molar. 
Fig.  20.  View  of  tho  triturating  surfaces,  much  worn,  of  the  same  teeth. 


U.  S,  Geological  Survey  of  the  Terntoriee. 


T^  SINCLAIR  *  SON,  PHILAOCLPMIA 


1-8    PALAEOSYOPS  PALLTDOSUS  |  9-18.  HYRACHYUS  AGRARIUS. 

ly   au.  HYRACHYUS  EXilvUaS. 


EXPLANATION    OF    PLATE    V. 


All  the  figures  of  the  natural  size  except  Fig.  11,  -which  is  one-half  the  size. 

rigs.  1-3   Trogosu.s  castoridens.    A  lower  jaw,  discovered  iu  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger  by  Dr. 

Carter. 
Fig.  1.  View  of  the  left  ramus  of  the  jaw. 
Fig.  2.  Triturating  surface  of  the  second  true  molar,  much  worn.    The  other  molars  are  too 

much  injured  to  ho  characteristic. 
Fig.  3.  Front  view  of  the  jaw,  exhibiting  the  large  rodent-like  incisors. 

Figs.  4-11.  Pal^osyops  paludosus  : 

Fig.  4.  An  upper  last  premolar,  the  triturating  surface  much  worn.  From  Henry's  Fork. 
Hayden's  collection. 

Fig.  5.  An  upper  last  premolar,  nearly  unworn.  This  is  one  of  the  original  specimens  upon 
■which  the  genus  and  species  were  established.  From  Church  Buttes.  Hayden's  collec- 
tion of  1870. 

Fig.  6.  Outer  view  of  a  last  upxier  molar,  left  side.  Henry's  Fork.  Hayden's  collection 
of  1870. 

Fig.  7.  Triturating  surface  of  the  same  specimen ;  the  outer  fore-part  much  fissured,  with 
the  i)ortions  displaced  and  the  single  inner  lobe  partially  broken  away. 

Fig.  8.  Outer  view  of  a  second  njiper  molar,  from  the  opj)Osite  side  of  the  same  individual. 

Fig.  9.  The  triturating  surface,  with  the  outer  lobqs  much  worn.  Figs.  6-9  are  from 
specimens,  which  were  attributed  to  the  same  species  at  the  time  of  the  original  uotice  of 
it  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Academy  of  National  Sciences,  Philadelphia,  1870,  p.  113. 

Fig.  10.  View  of  the  triturating  surfaces  of  the  last  two  premolars  and  the  molars  from  the 
specimen  represented  in  the  next  figure. 

Fig.  11.  Left  ramus  of  a  lower  jaw,  containing  the  teeth  just  indicated.  This  fine  specimen 
was  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  thirteen  miles  southeast  of  Fort  Bridger. 


U.  H    Geological  Survey  of  the  Territoriee. 


Plate  V. 


T.   SINCLAIR   d>    SON,   PHILADELPHIA 


1-S  TROGOSUS  GASTORIDENS, 


4-11.  PALAEOSYOPS  PALUDOSUS. 


EXPLANATION    OF   PLATE    VI. 


Figs.  1-9.  Hyopsodus  paulus.    All  of  the  natural  size  except  Figs.  2, 5,  8, 9,  which  are  niagnified  four 

diamoters. 
Fig.  1.  Right  side  of  lower  jaw,  with  the  three  molars.    From  au  individual  past  maturity. 

Specimen  from  which  the  genus  and  species  were  firsfeuoticod. 
Fig.  2.  Triturating  surfaces  of  the  molars  of  the  same  specimen. 
Fig.  3.  Left  side  of  lower  jaw,  with  last  premolar  and  the  three  molars.     Specimen  obtained 

by  Dr.  Corson  at  Grizzly  Buttes. 
Fig.  4.  Eight  side  of  lower  jaw,  with  last  premolar  and  the  molars,  but  slightly  worn. 

Specimen  obtained  by  Dr.  Carter. 
Fig.  5.  Triturating  surfaces  of  the  teeth  from  the  same. 

Figs.  6,  7.  Left  side  of  two  lower  jaws  containing  the  molars.     From  mature  but  compara- 
tively young  individuals.    Dr.  Carter. 
Fig.  8.  Series  of  the  back  two  premolars  and  the  molars  of  the  right  side.    From  a  specinleu 

loaned  by  Dr.  Carter. 
Fig.  9.  First  and  second  lower  molars  of  the  right  side.     From  another  specimen  loaned  by 

Dr.  Carter. 

Figs.  10,  11.  MicROsns  cuspidatus  : 

Fig.  10.  Portion  of  left  side  of  lower  jaw,  with  back  two  molars,  natural  size.     Specimen 

from  Black's  Fork  of  Green  -River. 
Fig.  11.  Triturating  surfaces  of  the  two  molars,  magnified  four  diameters. 
Fig.  12.  Portion  of  right  side  of  lowcfi-  jaw,  probably  pertainiug  to  the  last-named  animal. 

It  coutaius  the  roots  of  the  molars  and  the  last  premolar,  the  triturating  surface  of  which 

is  represented  in  Fig.  13,  magnified  four  diameters.    Specimen  obtained  by  Dr.  Carter  near 

Fort  Bridger. 

Figs.  14-17.  MiCRO.SYOPS  gracilis: 

Fig.  14.  Left  side  of  lower  jaw  with  the  molars,  natural  size.    Fig.  15.  Triturating  surfaces 

of  the  molars,  magnified  four  diameters.    Specimen  obtained  at  Grizzly  Buttes  by  Dr. 

Carter. 
Fig.  16.  Left  side  of  lower  jaw,  with  the  second  molar  and  portions  of  the  others,  natural 

size.     Fig.  17.  The  triturating  surface  of  the  second  molar  magnified  four  diameters. 

Specimeu  obtained  by  Dr.  Carter  at  Grizzly  Buttes. 

Figs.  18-22.  Hyopsodus  padlus: 

Fi"-.  18.  Right  upper  jaw,  with  three  premolars  and  the  molars,  magnified  'two  diameters. 

Fig.  19.  Tritiu-atiug  surfaces  of  the  teeth  magnified  four  diameters.  Specimen  obtained 
by  Dr.  Carter  at  Grizzly  Buttes,  aud  apparently  pertaining  to  the  same  individual  as  that 
of  Fig.  14. 

Fig.  20.  Triturating  surfaces  of  the  right  upper  molars,  magnified  four  diameters,  from  a 
second  specimen.     Dr.  Carter. 

Fig.  21.  Triturating  surfaces  of  back  two  premolars  and  first  molar  of  the  left  side,  magni- 
fied four  diameters.     Obtained  by  Dr.  Carter  at  Lodge-polo  trail. 

Fi"'.  Hi.  Triturating  surfaces  of  upper  secoud  and  third  premolars  of  right  side,  magnified 
four  diamoters.    Dr.  Carter. 

Figs.  23-25.  PARAMY.S  del!Catu.s  : 

Fig.  23.  Right  side  of  lower  jaw,  with  all   the  molars,  natural  size.    Fig.  24.  Triturating 
surfaces  of  the  molars  except  the  last,  which  is  broken  away  csccptiug  the  outer  portion, 
magnified  three  diameters.     Grizzly  Buttes.     Dr.  Carter. 
Fi".  2.'>.  Triturating  surfaces  of  the  molar  series,  except  the  last,  of  the  lower  right  side, 
magnified  three  diameters.     From  another  specimen  loaned  by  Dr.  Carter. 


PLATE    VI. 


Figs.  26,  27.  Paramys  uelicatiok  : 

Fig.  26.  Left  side  lower  jaw,  with  the  second  molar,  natural  size.  Grizzly  Buttes.  Dr. 
Carter.     Fig.  27.  Triturating  surface  of  the  second  molar,  magnified  three  diameters. 

Figs.  28,  29.  Paramys  delicatissimus  : 

Fig.  28.  Eight  side  of  lower  jaw,  with  all  the  molars,  natural  size.  Grizzly  Buttes  Dr. 
Carter.     Fig.  29.  Triturating  surfaces  of  the  molar  series,  magnified  three  diameters. 

Fig.  30.  ScitjRAVUS(?)    Triturating  surface  of  a  lower  left  third  molar,  magnified  eight  diameters.     From 
a  portion  of  the  lower  jaw  obtained  at  Grizzly  Buttes  hy  Dr.  Carter. 

Figs.  31,32.  My'.sops  minimus: 

Fig.  31.  Right  side  of  lower  jaw,  with  third  and  fourth  molars,  magnified  two  diameters. 
Fig.  32.  Triturating  surfaces  of  the  teeth,  magnified  eight  diameters.     Dr.  Carter. 

Figs.    33-35.   LOPHIOTHERIUM  SY'LVATICUM  : 

Fig.  33.  Portion  of  left  side  of  lower  jaw,  with  last  premolar  and  first  and  last  molars, 
natural  size.  Fig.  34.  Triturating  surfaces  of  the  last  premolar  and  first  molar.  Fig.  35. 
Triturating  surface  of  the  last  molar.     Specimen  from  Henry's  Fork  of  Green  River. 

Figs.   36,  37.   NOTHARCTUS  TENEBROSUS  : 

Fig.  36.  Eight  side  of  lower  jaw,  with  canine  and  all  the  molar  series  except  the  first  pre- 
molar,  natural  size.      Fig.  37.  The  triturating  surfaces  of  the   molars,  magnified  two 
•  diameters.     Specimen  from  Black's  Fork  of  Green  Elver. 

Figs.  38,  39.  HipposTus  roMosus  (?) 

Fig.  38.  Triturating  surface  of  a  lower  right  second  molar,  magnified  two  diameters.    From 

a  jaw-fragment  from  near  Fort  Bridger.     Dr.  Carter. 
Fig.  39.  Trituratiug  surface  of  a  left  lower  first  molar,  magnified  two  diameters.     From  a 
jaw-fragment  obtained  by  Dr.  Carter  near  Fort  Bridger. 

Fig.    40.   HiPPOSYUS   ROBUSTIOR  : 

Triturating  surface  of  a  left  lower  second  molar,  magnified  two  diameters.  From  Henry's 
Fork  of  Green  Elver.     Professor  Haydeo. 

Fig.  41.  HiPPOSYUS  FORMOsus  : 

Triturating  surfaces  of  the  upper  left  first  and  second  molars,  magnified  three  diameters 
Specimen  firom  near  Fort  Bridger.     Dr.  Carter. 

Fig.  48.  Hyrachyus  nanus.: 

Triturating  surfaces  of  the  back  two  premolars,  and  the  molars,  magnified  one  and  a  half 
diameters.  Taken  from  the  left  side  of  the  lower  jaw  of  the  same  sjiecimeu  represented 
in  Fig.  14,  of  Plate  II.     Specimen  obtained  by  Dr.  Corson  at  Grizzly  Buttes. 

Fig.  43.  Trogosus  vetulus,  probably  Anchippodus  : 

Eight  lower  incisor,  natural  size.     From  near  Fort  Bridger.     Dr.  Carter. 

Fig.  44.  SiNOP.t^  RAPAX: 

Portion  of  left  side  of  lower  jaw,  with  last  premolar  and  first  molar,  natural  size.  From 
Grizzly  Buttes.     Dr.  Carter. 

Fig.  45.  SiNOPA  ExiMiA  : 

Portion  of  left  side  of  the  lower  jaw,  supposed  to  belong  to  a  smaller  species  of  the  former 
natural  size.     From  Grizzly  Buttes.    Dr.  Carter. 

Fig.  46.  Pal^acodon  verus  : 

Penultimate  molar  of  the  upper  left  side,  maguitied  four  diameters.  From  Lodge-polo  trail. 
Dr.  Carter. 


ij    S.  Geological  Kurvey  oi'  the  Territories. 


Plate  VI 


pec%iii\ 


J'    tv 


1-9.  HYOPSODUS  PAULUS. 
10,  11.  MICROSUS  CUSPIDATUS 
12,  13. 

14-17.   MICROSYOPS  GRACILIS 
18-22. 

23-26.  PARAMTS  DELICATDS. 
26,  27    P   DELICATIOR. 


28,  29    P   DELICATISSIMUS. 

30. 

31,  32.  MTSOPS  MINIMUS. 

33-36.  LOPHIOTHERItJM   STLVATICUM. 

36,  37.  NOTHARCTUS  TENEBROSUS. 

38,  39, 

40, 


T  SINCLAIR  a  SON    LITH   PHILAD* 


41. 

42.  HYRACHYUS  NANUS. 

43    ANCHIPPODUS  VETULUR 

44,  SINOPA  RAPAX. 

48.  , 

46.  PALvEACODON  VERIS 


EXI^LANATION    OF   PLATE   VII. 


All  tbo  figiu'cs  are  of  tbo  natural  size,  except  Fig.  10,  wliicb  is  retluced  to  oue-balf  the  diaui- 
eter  of  the  original. 

Figs.  1-5.  Merycocbcerus  rusticus.  From  specimens  obtained  on  Sweetwater  River,  Wyoming,  by 
Professor  Haydeu's  party  in  1870. 

Fig.  1.  Series  of  upper  molars  of  tbc  right  side,  viewed  on  their  tritnrating  surfaces.  The 
last  tooth  bad  not  entirely  protruded,  and  m  the  lirst  ono  the  median  enamel-pits  are 
nearly  obliterated. 

Fig.  2.  Upper  last  premolar  and  molar  of  the  left  side,  of  the  temporary  series. 

Fig.  3.  Upper  second  and  third  premolars  of  the  left  side,  of  the  permanent  scries.  The  trit- 
urating surfaces  but  slightly  -worn. 

Pig.  4.  Outer  view  of  the  same  teeth,  in  a  small  jaw-fragraeut. 

Fig.  5.  Symphysis  of  the  lower  jaw,  with  the  four  incisors  on  each  .side. 

Fig.  fi.  Mekycochceiuis  pkoprics.  First  and  second  upper  molars  of  the  right  side.  From  a  specimen 
obtained  on  the  Niobrara  River,  by  Professor  Hayden,  in  1857. 

Figs.  7-11.  Oreodon  supercus.     From  specimei^s  discovered  in  Oregon  by  the  Rev.  Thomas  Condon. 
Fig.  7.  Last  lower  molar  of  the  right  side,  viewed  on  the  triturating  surfixco. 
Fig.  8.  First  and  part  of  the  second  molars,  from  the  same  jaw-fragment  as  the  preceding 

figure. 
Fig.  9.    The  three  lower  jjremolars  of  the  right  side,  viewed  ou  their  triturating  surfaces. 

From  the  same  specimen  as  Fig.  16,  Plato  II. 
Fig.  10.  Upper  view  of  the  intermediate  portion  of  the  face,  one-half  the  natural  size. 
Fig.  11.  View  of  the  inner  surface  of  a  lower  canine,  from  the  left  side  of  a  specimen  of  a 

jaw,  which  lies  with  its  outer  face  imbedded  in  a  hard  mass  of  rock. 

Fig.  12.  Oreodon  Culbertsoni.    A  series  of  upper  true  molars  of  the  left  side.    Specimen  discovered 

by  Mr.  Condon  on  John  Day's  River,  Oregon. 
Figs.  13,  14.  DicoTYi-ES  PRI.STIN0S.    Specimens  in  the  Condon  collection  of  Oregon  fossils. 

Fig.  13.  Triturating  surface  of  a  lower  penultimate  molar. 

Fig.  14.  Outer  view  and  view  of  the  triturating  surface  of  a  lower  last  molar.  _ 
Fig.  15.  Anchithekium  Bairdi.    An  upper  right  molar.     From  the  Condon  collection. 

Figs.  16,  17.  ANcniTHERiUM  agreste.  From  a  specimen  found  ou  Red  Rock  Creek,  one  of  the  head 
streams  of  the  Jefferson  Fork  of  the  Missouri.    Obtained  by  Professor  Hayden  in  1871. 

Fig.  16.  Lower  last  premolar  and  first  molar  of  the  left  side.  Triturating  surface  much 
worn. 

Fig.  17.  Last  molar,  from  the  same  specimen  of  the  jaw  as  the  former. 

Figs.  18,  19.  Felis  ACGUSTU.S.     Specimens  discovered  by  Professor  Hayden  on  the  Loup  Fork  of  the 
Niobrara  River,  Nebraska. 
Fig.  18.  Portion  of  the  right  premaxillary,  containing  the  second  incisor,  viewed  in  front. 
Fig.  19.  Upper  sectorial  molar  of  the  left  side,  viewed  externally. 

Fig.  20.  Patriofells  ulta  (?)    A  premolar,  probably  of  the  up^ier  jaw.     Specimen  found  by  Dr.  Carter  in 
the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger,  Wyoming. 

Figs.  21-23.   Teeth  of  a  carnivore,  undetermiued.     Obtained  by  Professor  Haydeu's  party  on  Henry's 
Fork  of  Green  River,  Wyoming. 
I<'')g.  21.  Outer  view  of  the  crown  of  an  anterior  premolar.     Fig.  22.  tljiper  view  of  the  same. 
Fig.  23.  Outer  view  of  the  crown  of  a  eauiue  tootli. 


PLATE    VII. 


Figs.  24,  25.  Rhinoceros  pacikicus.  A  left  iuferior  molar  tooth,  from  Bridger  Creek,  Oregon,  belonging 
to  the  Coiulou  collection. 

Fig.  24.  View  of  the  outer  part  of  the  crown.  Fig.  25.  Triturating  surface  of  the  same  speci- 
men. 

Fig.  26.  A  canine  tooth  of  au  undetermined  animal,  probably  of  a  large  carnivore,  but  it  may 
be  of  an  Elotherium-like  pachyderm.  The  specimen  belongs  to  the  Condon  collection  of 
Oregon  fossils,  and  is  labeled  '■  Alkali  Flats." 

Fig.  27.  Elotherium  ihperatok.     a  supposed  incisor  tooth,  inner  view.      Specimen  labeled  "  Bridge 
Creek,"  and  belonging  to  the  Condon  collection  of  Cregor  fossils. 

Figs.  28,  29.  Elotherium  Mortoni?    An  incisor  tooth,  obtained  by  Mr.  Peiroe,  of  Denver,  twenty  miles 
southeast  from  Cheyenne  City,  Wyoming. 
Fig.  2H.  Inner  view  of  the  tooth.     Fig.  29.  Outer  view  of  the  same. 

Fig.  30.  Canine  of  an  undetermined  carnivore.  It  resembles  the  iuferior  canines  of  a  bear^ 
but  is  more  comi^ressed.  Specimen  discovered  by  Professor  Haydeu  on  White  River,  Da- 
kota, in  1866.  The  crown  is  compressed  conical,  with  the  inner  surface  defiued  in  the 
usual  manner  by  acute  borders.  The  faug  exhibits  a  gibbous  character.  Length  of  crown 
11  lines ;  breaflth  at  base,  8  lines ;  thickness,  H  lines. 


a.  S.  Geological  Survey  of  the  Tarntoriea. 


Plate  VII. 


iSmClMtiSOHUTH  PHtU 


EXPLANATION    OF  PLATE   VIII. 


Figures  all  oue-half  the  diameter  of  uature. 

Fig.  1.  A  lumbar  vertebra  of  a  crocodile.    From  Little  Sandy  River.    Haydeu's  collection  of 
1870.     (Crocodilus  Elliotti.) 

Fig.  2.  Crocodilus  .vptus  : 

A  cervical  vertebra,  found  on  South  Bitter  Creek,  Wyoming. 

Fig.  3.  A  first  caudal  vertebra  of  a  crocodile.     From  Little  Sandy  River.    Hayden's  collec- 
tion of  1870. 

Figs.  4-6.  Crocodilus  Elliotti.    Hayden's  collection  of  1870. 

Fig.  4.  Portion  of  tbo  left  maxillary,  containing  tUe  fourth  and  fifth  teeth  of  that  bone 

From  the  junction  of  Big  Sandy  and  Green  Rivers. 
Fig.  5.  Upper  extremity  of  a  left  femur.    From  near  Little  Sandy  River. 
Figs.  6,  7.  Upper  view  of  a  large  portion  of  the  skull.     Found  by  H.  W.  Elliott,  ou  Little 
Sandy  River. 
.    Fig.  8.  Left  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw  of  a  larger  individual,  or  jierhaps  of  a  larger  species. 
Discovered  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger  by  Dr.  Josei)h  K.  Corson,  and  presented  by  him 
to  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia. 


U.   S.  Gfoloc^icai  Sui-v'»T  .;i   in-r  T^rnioT.e 


Plate  VIII 


"^-c^ 


^   -  V 


■  f^  ±d''  »«.'  vW 


^^ 


I.  SINCLAIB  a  SON.  PulLAOELFm* 


CROCODILES.      H  SIZE 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE   IX. 


All  the  figures  lialf  the  natural  size. 

Fig.  I.  Trionyx  guttatus  : 

Portion  of  a  carapace,  consisting  of  the  third  to  the  sixth  vertebral  iilates,  inclusively, 
together  with  parts  of  the  contignous  costal  plates.  Specimen  obtained  at  Church  Buttes 
during  Professor  Hayden's  exploration  of  1868. 

Figs.  2-6.  Emys  wyomingensis  : 

Fig.  2.  Portion  of  a  carapace  comprising  the  vertebral  jjlates  from  the  first  to  the  eighth 
inclusively,  together  with  small  portions  of  some  of  the  contiguous  costal  jilates. 
Specimen,  originally  referred  to  Emijs  Sterensoniamis,  obtained  l)y  Dr.  Carter  in  the 
vicinit.'^of  Fort  Bridger,  and  presented  by  him  to  the. Smithsonian  Institution. 

Fig.  3.  Portion  of  a  plastron,  ivhich  accompanied  the  jireceding  specimen  and  was  origi- 
nally referred  to  E.  Slcrcnsoiiianus. 

Fig.  4.  Anterior  fragment  of  another  plastron,  accompanying  the  former  two  specimens,  and 
likewise  referred  to  E.  Steveiisoriiaiuis. 

Fig.  5.  An  episternal,  upon  which  the  species  Emys  wijomiiif/ensiii  was  first  noticed.  Specimen 
found  by  Dr.  Carter  near  Fort  Bridger. 

Fig.  6.  Central  portion  of  a  carapace,  originally  attributed  to  Emys  Saydeiii.  Specimen 
obtained  near  Fort  Bridger.    Haj'den's  collection. 

Fig.  7  Emys  petrolei: 

Two  episternals  from  different  individuals.     Specimens  from  Hardin  County,  Texas. 


CO 


CO 

D 
H 

o 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE   X. 


Represents  the  nearly  complete  shell  of  Eai YS  wyomingensis,  one-lialf  the  natural  size.  It  was  originally 
referred  to  a  species  with  the  name  of  Emys  Jeaneni.  Specimen  obtained  from  the  vicinity 
of  Fort  Bridger,  dnring  Professor  Hayden's  exploration  of  1870. 

Fig.  1.  View  of  the  plastron. 

Fig.  2.  View  of  the  carapace. 


o 


03 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE   XI. 


Testudo  Oorsoni  : 

Both  specimens  iieitainetl  to  the  same  shell,  aurt  were  originaUy  described  uuder  the  name 

of  Eiiii/^  Carteri.     They  were  discovered  near  Fort  Bvldger  by  Dr.  Carter,  and  presented  to 

the  Academy  of  Philadelphia. 
Fig.  1.  The  greater  part  of  the  iilastron,  its  anterior  extremity  to  the  right,  one-third  the 

natural  size. 
Fig.  2.  The  anterior  intermediate  portion  of  the  carapace,  its  front  to  the  left,  one-half  the 

natural  size. 


U.  S,  Geological  Survey  o?  the  Terntonea 


Plate  XI, 


T,   SINCLAIR  l>  SOM.  OMiLAOELPHIA, 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE  XII. 


Baptemys  wyomxngensis  : 

Figures  one-third  the  natural  size.  Specimen  discovered  at  Church  Buttes,  Wyoming,  by 
Mr.  O.  C.  Smith,  of  Leverett,  Massachusetts,  while  engaged  in  service  of  the  Union  Pacific 
Eailroad.  It  now  belongs  to  the  museum  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Phila- 
delphia. 

Fig.  1.  View  of  the  carapace. 

Fig.  2.  View  of  the  sternum. 


s 

m 
o 


CO 

Ph 

< 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE   XIII. 


BaSna  akenosa  : 

Figures  one-half  the  natural  size. 

Figs.  1,  2.  Specimen  on  which  the  genus  and  species  were  originally  estahlished.  Dis- 
covered at  the  junction  of  the  Big  Sandy  and  Greeu  Rivers,  Wyomiug,  during  Profe.ssor 
Hayden's  exploration  of  1870. 

Fig.  1.  View  of  the  carapace. 

Fig.  2.  View  of  the  plastron,  its  anterior  extremity  lost. 

Fig.  3.  View  of  the  plastrou  of  another  specimen,  originally  referred  to  a  species  with  the 
name  of  Baina  affinis.  It  was  discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  at  Chnrch  Buttes,  and  was  pre- 
sented by  him  to  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadeljihia. 


^-  *F?r^r5>' 


.  ^«if^ 


tfff^^p^ 


.-■■^'t 


.r^-^iSJ," 


V" 


-gSsj^feii-j  -;..'■  "®^'%^' 


<,»a5'Sf'^.| 


i^-*ij 


«W 


« 


jSjisw^-.'^a     »-    ■^'^Set^i^^JiT^*- 


^ji»^7%"*  *cV^  *--i^^     T  ^  "*    •<'~     j(    t  ^«^^ 


n"~^-'^. 


,-#!*- 


*..' 


3 


cr 


Uc 


EXPLANATION    OF   PLATE   XIV. 


Chisternon  dndatum,  originally  referred  to  Bai^ita  niiilata.  Figures  oue-balf  the  natural  size.  Speci- 
men discovered  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger  by  Dr.  Carter,  and  presented  by  him  to  the 
Academy  of  Natural  Sciences. 

Fig.  1.  View  of  the  carapace  ;  the  sutures  scarcely  visible. 

Fig.  2.  View  of  the  greater  portion  of  the  plastron,  with  the  left  border  of  the  carapace. 
The  crucial  suture  of  the  plastron  is  visible,  from  which  the  genus  received  its  name. 


'?' 


i^'ls'f-SSi,.^ 


/ 


\\ 


>^-—'-:~-~ 


U 


M 


■>>- 


\   ■ 
-1' 


:igi^y*^' 


EXPLANA'J'ION    OF   PLATE   XV. 


Figs.  1-5.  Ba^  na  arenosa  : 

Fig.  1.  Anterior  extremity  of  the  i)lastron,'eshil)itiiig  the  two  pairs  of  gular  scute  areas. 

From  the  same  specimen  as  Fig.  3,  of  Plate  XIII.     One-half  the  natural  size. 
Fig.  2.  Anterior  extremity  of  the  plastron,  from  another  specimen  found  by  Dr.  Carter  on 

Henry's  Fork  of  Green  River.    Tlie  gular  scute  areas  are  larger,  and  the  surface  of  the 

plates  is  conipurafively  smooth.     One-half  the  natural  size. 
Fi"'.  3.  From  a  specimen  fonud  by  Dr.  Corson  at  Grizzly  Buttes.    It  is  of  greater  proportiou- 

ate  breadth  than  the  former,  and  presents  x  want  of  symmetry  in  the  gular  scute  areas. 

One-half  the  natural  size. 
Figs.  4,  5.  Of  the  natural  size.     From  a  young  specimen  obtained  by  Professor  Haydeu's 

party  "at  the  junction  of  Big  Sandy  ^nd  Green  Rivers.    It  retains  the  sutures,  which  are 

obliterated  in  the  preceding  mature  specimens. 
Fig.  4.  Inferior  view. 
Fig.  5.  Superior  view,  exhibiting  the  trident  form  of  th3  eutosternal  bone. 

Fi"-.  6.  Baptemvs  wyomingensis.  One-half  the  natural  size.  A  portion  of  the  anterior  extremity  of 
the  plastron,  from  a  specimen  obtained  by  Professor  Haydeu's  party  at  Church  Buttes.  It 
presents  no  distinction  between  gular  and  humeral  scute  areas. 

Fig.  7.  Tbstudo  CoRSONi.  Anteriorextremityof  a  plastron,  one-half  the  natural  size.  From  a  specimen 
discovered  by  Dr.  Corson  at  Grizzly  Buttes. 

Fio-,  8.  Supposed  turtle  egg,  natural  size.  A  frequent  fossil  of  the  indurated  clays  of  the  Bridgcr  bf'ds. 
They  are  usually  about  the  size  of  the  specimen  represented,  though  quite  small  ones  are 
also  fonud,  like  that  represented  in  Fig.  01,  Plate  XXXII.  They  have  an  outer  calcareous 
crust,  and  are  iilled  with  the  same  material  as  the  imhe<ldiug  matrix.  Usually  one  end  is 
truncated  and  rough,  as  if  the  shell  had  been  originally  broken.  Sometiuies  the  truncated 
end  apitears  covered  with  a  low  conical  disk,  resembling  an  operculum,  as  represented  in 
Figs.  60,  61,  Plate  XXXII. 

Fi'^  9.  Hybemys  arenakius.  A  marginal  plate,  exhibiting  the  bosses  ou  its  outer  extension.  From 
a  specimen  found  by  Prt)fes8or  Haydeu's  party  on  Little  Sandy  Creek.    Natural  size. 

Fig.  10.  Stylemys  OREGONEN.SI8.  A  vertebral  plate,  one-half  the  natural  size.  From  Crooked  River, 
Oregon. 

Figs.  11-13.  NoTHOSAUKOPS  OCCLDUUS.     Three  views  of  a  vertebra,  natural  size,  from  .i  specimen  ob- 
tained by  Professor  Haydeu  on  Moreau  River. 
Fig.  II.  Side  view  of  the  centrum,  exhibiting  the  sutural  surface  of  the  neural  arch. 
Fig.  12.  Upper  view  of  the  same. 
Fig.  13.  View  of  the  anterior  end. 

Figs.  14,  15.  Saniwa.     Natural  size. 

•  Fig.  14.  Saniwa  major.     Distal  extremity  of  a  humerus,  from  a  specimen  found   by  Dr. 
Carter  at  the  Lodge-pole  trail,  ou  Dry  Creek,  Wyoming. 
Fig.  15.  Saniwa  ensiden.s.    Two  dorsal  vertebrai  as  they  lie  iu  the  matrix,  inferior  view, 
from  a  specimen  obtained  near  Granger,  Wyoming,  during  Professor  Haydeu's  exploration. 

Figs.  lB-18.  Antrodemus.  In  the  text,  page  267,  under  the  name  of  Poicilopleuron  valens.  Figures 
one-balf  the  natural  size.  Three  views  of  one-half  of  a  vertebra,  from  Middle  Park, 
Colorado. 

Fjo-.  16.  End  view,  exhibiting  the  articular  surface  of  the  centrum. 

Fig.  17.  Side  view. 

Fig.  18.  View  of  the  Ijroken  surface  of  the  vertebra,  exhibiting  the  large  areola^  of  the 
interior  of  the  centrum,  inclosed  by  thick  walls  of  compact  substance. 


U.   S.   G.oological  Survey  of  the  Territories 


Plate  X.V" 


\- 


„^_ 


N       njk 


5& 


T.  SINCLAIR  &  SON,  PHILADELPHIA 


1-5    BAENA  ARENOSA,     >^ 
6.  BAPTEMYS.     >:^. 
7    TESTUDO  CORSON]      ;^ 
9.  HYBEMYS. 


10    STYLEMYS     yi 

11- IS.  NOTHOSAUROPS. 

14    15.  SANIVA 

16-18    ANTRODEMtrS.     }4 


EXPLANATION    OF  PLATE   XVI. 


All  tbe  figures  of  tlio  natural  size,  except  Figs.  13-17. 

Figs.  1-6.    Ano.steira  ohnata  : 

Fig.  1.  Portions  of  tlio  carapace. 

Fig.  2.  Portion  of  the  same  specimen,  with  portions  of  tlie  plastron.     Siiecimens  collected 

by  Dr.  Carter  in  the  vicinity  of  Fort  Bridger. 
Fig.  3.  Inner  view  of  tbrfee  oostals,  from  a  portion  of  the  same  specimen  as  Fig.  1,  exhibiting 

the  costal  capitula. 
Fig.  4.  A  third  marginal  plate  from  a  larger  individual.    Dr.  Carter. 
Fig.  5.  A  fourth  marginal  plate  of  the  left-side  of  another  individual.     From  Washakia ; 

collected  by  James  Stevenson. 
Fig.  6.  Section  of  a  i^ygal  plate.     From  a  specimen  found  bj'  Professor  Haydeu  at  Church 

Buttes. 
Fig.  7.  Ilium  of  a  turtle.     Obtained  at  Grizzly  Buttes  by  Dr.  Carter. 

Figs.  8,  9.  BjuSna  arenosa  : 

Fig.  8.  Ilium  of  the  right  side,  outer  view.  Fig.  9.  Sacrum,  inferior  view.  Sjiecimens  ob- 
tained from  portions  of  the  matrix,  pertaining  to  the  specimen  of  the  shell  represented  in 
Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  XIII. 

Fig.  10.  Opisthocoelian  caudal  vertebra  of  a  turtle.  From  near  Lodge-ijolo  trail.  Dr. 
Carter. 

Fig.  11.  Fragment  of  a  costal  plate  of  a  trionyx.    From  near  Fort  Bridger.    Dr.  Carter. 

Fig.  12.  Fragment  of  a  costal  j)lat6  of  a  trionyx.  From  Little  .Sandy  Creek.  Professor 
Hayden. 

Figs.  13-17.  Glyptosaxjrus.    All  magnified  two  diameters. 

Figs.  13-15.  Osseous  dermal  plates  of  the  body.  Figs.  16,  17.  Plates  of  the  head.  From 
Grizzly  Buttes.     Dr.  Carter. 

Figs.  18,  10.  Oligosimus  grand.evus  : 

Fig.  18.  Posterior  view  of  a  caudal  vertebra.  Fig.  19.  Lateral  view.  Specimen  obtained 
by  Professor  Hayden's  party  on  Henry's  Fork  of  Green  Kiver. 


JJ.  8.  GeologiGal  Survey  of  the  Territories 


Plate  SVI 


T  SINCHID  1  S.IV    IITH   PUII  HO' 


1-6.  ANOSTEIRA  ORNATA 

7.  ILnJM  OF  TURTLE 

8,  9    BAENA  AREN03A 


10  ■'/t:rti       _     :•   •; .  htle 
11,  12.  ccstals  of  tfjontx 

lS-17    aLYPTOSAURUS. 


13,  19    OLIG-OSIMUS  GRANDE VUS. 


EXPLANATION    OF   PLATE   XVII. 


All  tbo  tigiires  of  tUo  natural  size,  except  Figs.  9,  10. 

Fig.  1.  Clupea  IIU5IILIS.     From  the  original  specimen  obtained  by  Dr.  John  E.  Evans,  on  Green  River, 
in  1806. 

Fig.  2.  Clupea  alta.    From  the  "Petrified  Fish  Cut,"  on  the  Union  Pacific  Railroad,  near  Green  River. 

Fig.  3.  Petalodus  allegh-vniensis.    Tooth,  front  view,  from  a  specimen  obtained  by  Messrs.  Meek  and 
Hayden,  in  the  ni^iier  carboniferous  formation  of  Fort  Riley,  Kansas. 

Figs.  4-6.  Cladodus   occidentalis.     Tooth  found  by  Messrs.  Meek  and  Hayden,  in  the  upper  coal 
measures  of  Manhattan,  Kansas. 
Fig.  4.  Back  view.    Fig.  5.  Section  of  the  crown.     Fig.  6.  Bottom  of  the  root.  . 

Figs.  7,  8.  PTYcnoDUS  occidentalis.    Tooth  discovered  by  Dr.  John  L.  Le  Coute,  in  the  Cretaceous 
formation  east  of  Fort  Haj's,  Kansas. 
Fig.  7.  Upjier  view.     Fig.  8.  Lateral  view. 

Figs.  9,  10.  XiPHACTiNUS  AUDAX.    A  pectoral  .spine,  one-half  the  natural  size. 
Fig.  9.  Inferior  view.    Fig.  10.  Superior  view. 

Figs.  11-17.  Myi.ocypeinds  robustus.    Pharyngeal  bones,  from  Idaho,  contained  iu  the  collection  of 

Professor  J.  S.  Newberry. 
Fig.  11.  Interior  view  of  a  left  pharyngeal,  containing  the  three  intermediate  teeth. 
Fig.  12.  Inferior  view  of  a  right  pharyngeal,  containing  the  anterior  three  teeth. 
Fig.  13.  Same  view  of  a  smaller  left  pharyngeal,  with  the  posterior  four  teeth. 
Fig.  14.  Similar  view  of  another  specimen,  with  the  anterior  three  teeth  and  the  bases  of 

the  posterior  two  teeth. 
Fig.  15.  Posterior  view  of  a  right  pharyngeal  of  an  old  auimal,  with  the  second  aud  fourth 

teeth. 
Fig.  16.  Inner  view  of  a  right  pharyngeal,  with  the  posterior  four  teeth. 
Fig.  17.  Posterior  view  of  the  same  siiecimen. 

Figs.  18,  19.  Oncobatis  pentagonus.    Dermal  plate,  from  the  Pliocene  of  Sinker  Creek,  Idaho. 
Fig.  18.  Upper  view.    Fig.  19.  Lateral  view. 

Fig.  20.  Enchodus  Shujiaedi.    Dentary  bone,  natural  size,  but  reversed  iu  position.     From  the  Cre- 
taceous of  Dakota. 

Figs.  21,  22.  Cladocyclus  occident^vlis.    Two  scales,  natural  size.    Found  with  the  preceding. 

Figs.  23,  24.  Phasganodus  dirus.    From  Cannonball  River,  Dakota. 
Fig.  23.  A  tooth  of  the  natural  size. 
Fig.  24.  Dentary  bone,  reduced  one-third. 

Fig.  25.  Xystracantiius  arcuatus.     A  dorsal  spine,  from  Leavenworth,  Kansas. 

Fig.  26.  Hadrohy^u.s  .suprbjius: 

The  mutilated  crown  of  an  upper  premolar  tooth,  natural  size,  seen  on  the  triturating  sur- 
face.   From  the  Miocene  Tertiary  of  Oregon. 


U    S    G-eoJo^Teal  Survey  ol"  the  Territ':>riefl 


flate  XVll 


r  s/»a  A/ir  *  suff  iiTH  ph'l  • 


EXPLANATION    OF   PLATE   XVIII. 


All  the  figures  are  of  the  natural  size  except  Figs.  51,  5'2. 

Figs.  1-14.  Ptychodus  MoitxoNl: 

Figs.  1,  2.  Upper  and  posterior  views  of  a  large  tootli  from  Kansas,  obtained  by  Dr.  George 

M.  Sternberg. 
Figs.  3,  4.  Upper  and  posterior  views  of  auotber  tootb,  apparently  from  the  same  individual. 
Figs.  5,  C.  Upper  and  posterior  views  of  another  tooth  from  the  same  locality. 
Figs.  7,  8.  Upper  and  posterior  views  of  another  tooth  from  the  same  locality. 
Figs.  9,  10.  Upper  and  posterior  views  of  another  tooth  from  the  same  locality. 
Figs.  11,  12.  Upper  and  anterior  views  of  a  large  tooth  from  near  Columbus,  Mississippi, 

found  by  Dr.  William  Sinllman. 
Figs.  13,  14.  Upper  and  posterior  views  of  a  tooth  from  Green  County,  Alabama,  obtained 

by  Professor  Joseph  Jones. 

Figs.  1.5-18.  PTYCHonus  occiDHNTA'Lis.     Specimen  obtained  near  Fort   Hays,  Kansas,  by  Dr.  John  L. 
Le  Conte. 
Figs.  15,  16.  Upper  and  posterior  views  of  a  worn  tooth. 
Figs.  17,  18.  Upper  views  of  two  small  teeth. 

Figs.  19,  20.  Ptychodus  Whippleyi.    The  specimen  obtained  in  the  Cretaceous  formation  of  Texas,  by 
Dr.  Benjamin  F.  Shiimard. 
Fig.  19.  Upper  view  of  a  tooth. 
Fig.  20.  Posterior  view  of  the  same  tooth. 

Figs.  21-25.    OXYRHINA  EXTE.VTA  : 

Figs.  21-23.  Views,  external  or  anterior,  of  three  teeth  from  the   Cretaceous   formation  of 

Kansas,  obtained  by  Dr.  George  M.  Sternberg. 
Figs.  24,  25.  External  v.iews  of  two  teeth,  from  the  Cretaceous  formation  near  Columbus, 

Mississippi,  obtained  by  Dr.  William  Spillman. 

Figs.  26-28.  Otodus  divaricatus.    The  specimen  from  Texas,  probably  from  a  Cretaceous  formation. 
Loaned  for  examination  by  Dr.  William  Spillman. 
Fig.  2fi.  External  or  anterior  view  of  the  tooth. 
Fig.  27.  Lateral  view  reversed. 
Fig.  28.  Internal  or  posterior  view. 

Figs.  29-40.  Galeocerdo  falcatus.     External  views  of  teeth. 

Figs.  29-31.  Specimens  from  the  Cretaceous  of  Kansas,  collected  by  Dr.  George  M.  Sternberg. 
Figs.  32-36.  Specimens   from  the  Cretaceous,  near  Columbus,  Mississippi,  collected   by  Dr. 

William  Spillman. 
Figs.  37-40.  Specimens  from  the  Cretaceous,  near  Fort  Hays,  Kansas,  collected  by  Dr.  John 

L.  Lo  Conte. 
Figs.  41,  42.  Specimens  from  the  Cretaceous  of  Texas,  collected  by  Dr.  Benjamin  F.  Shumard. 
Fig.  43.  Specimen  from  the  chalk  of  Sussex,  England. 

Figs.  44,  45.  Lamna  : 

Fig.  44.  External  view  of  a  tooth,  from  the  Cretaceons,  near  Fort  Hays,  Kansas,  found  by  Dr. 

John  L.  Le  Conte. 
Fig.  45.  External  view  of  a  similar  but  smaller  tooth,  from  the  chalk  of  Sussex,  England. 

Figs.  4G-49.  Lamna  : 

Figs.  46,  47.  Specimens  from  the  Cretaceous  of  New  Jersey.  Fig.  46.  Lateral  view  of  a  tooth. 
Fig.  47.  E::terual  view  of  another  specimen. 

Figs.  48,  49.  Specimens  from  the  Cretaceous  of  Missisnppi,  collected  by  Dr.  William  .Spill- 
man.   Fig.  id.  Lateral  view  of  a  tooth.     Fig.  4).  External  view  of  another  tootli. 

Fig.  .50.  Outer  view  of  a  tooth.  Specimen  from  the  Cretaceous  of  Kansas,  collected  by  Pro- 
fessor Hayden. 

Figs.  51,  52.  Pal/EOSY<ops  paludosos.     Oue-half  the  natural  si7,e. - 

Fig.  51.  Side  view  of  the  face;   from  the  same  specimen  as  the  teeth  of  Fig.  3,  Plate  IV. 
Fig.  52.  Lower  jaw;  repeated  from  the  same  specimen  as  Fig.  11,  Plate  V. 


U.   S,   geological  Survey  of  the  Territories 


Plate  XSnil. 


''■■■''^^'i'0^. 


ThoK.  SmcLuric  Soa,.lJftx.Flula. 


EXPLANATION    OF  PLATE   XIX. 


Figs.  1-4.  PaLvEOSYOPS  rAi.uDosu.s.     All  half  size  except  Fig.  4. 
Fig.  1.  Front  view  of  the  left  femur. 
Fig.  2.  Lower  extremity  of  the  right  femur. 
Fig.  3.  Distal  extremity  of  the  right  humerus. 
Fig.  4.  The  right  patella,  luuer  view,  natural  size.    Lodge-pole  tr.ail.     Dr.  Carter. 

Fig.  5.  Hyrachyus.    Au  astragalus.     Natural  size. 

Fig.  6.  Distal  extremity  of  left  femur  of  Testudo  niol/rarensis,  one-half  the  natural  size. 

Fig.  7.  Distal  extremity  of  right  humerus  of  Testudo  nebmscensis,  from  a  young  animal,  half  the  natural 
size. 

Fig.  8.  Distal  extremity  of  the  right  humerus  of  Testudo  nioirarensis,  half  the  natural  size. 

Fig.  9.  Portion  of  a  carapace  of  Tesludo  nehrascensis,  internal  surface  exhibitiug  the  ridge  of  attachment 
of  the  neural  sijines  and  the  narrow  costal  cajjitula,  natural  size. 

Fig.  10.  Portion  of  right  scapula  of  Testudo  neJirascciisis,  hack  view,  one-half  the  natural  size. 

Fig.  11.  Sacral  vertebrae  of  Clustcrnoit  undatum,  inferior  view,  natural  size. 

Fig.  12.  Lateral  view  of  the  same. 

Fig.  13.  Ungual  phalanx  of  an  undetermined  reptile,  one-half  the  natural  size.    See  page  285. 

Fig.  14.  Dermal  plate  of  Ti/losteus  ornatus,  one-half  the  natural  size. 

Figs.  15,  16.  Pycnodus  faba.    Natural  size. 

Fig.  15.  Portion  of  a  left  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw,  with  teeth.    The  specimen  from  the  Creta- 
ceous formation  of  Mississijipi, 
Fig.  16.  Fragment  of  the  left  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw,  with  three  teeth,  from  the  greensand 
of  Crosswicks,  Burlington  County,  New  Jersey. 

Figs.  17-20.  Hadrodus  priscus,  natural  size.  Specimen  belonging  to  Dr.  William  Spillman,  of  Colum- 
bus, Mississippi,  and  found  by  him  in  the  cretaceous  formation  of  that  State. 

Fig.  17.  Front  view  of  a  supposed  premaxillary  bono,  with  two  teeth. 

Fig.  18.  Posterior  view  of  the  same,  exhibiting  at  the  sides  the  two  reserve  cavities  for  suc- 
cessioual  teeth. 

Fig.  ID.  Lateral  view. 

Fig.  20.  Inferior  view. 

Figs.  21,  22.  EuMY'LODUS  LAQUEATUS.    Mandible  two-thirds  natural  size.     From  the  Cretaceous  forma- 
tion of  Mississippi,  discovered  by  Dr.  William  Spillman. 
Fig.  21.  Inner  view  ;  specimen  reversed. 
Fig.  22.  View  of  the  upper  or  triturating  surface,  with  the  inner  surface  in  xjcrspective. 


XJ.   S.   G.eological  Su^'vey  of  the  Territories 


Plate  X:XX. 


rhoB,  Sinclair ieSoa.  lith.Phila. 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE  XX. 


Fig.  1-7.  Paljeosyops  paludosus.    Figures  one-lialf  size. 

Fig.  1.  Tibia  of  tbe  right  side,  front  view.      From  Grizzly  Bnttos.     Haydon's  collection 

of  1870. 
Fig.  2.  Calcanonm,  upper  view.    Fount!  by  Dr.  Corson  on  Smitb's  Fork  of  Greeu  River. 
Fig.  3.  Astr.^galus,  upper  view.    Found  by  Dr.  Carter  near  Miller.sville. 
Fig.  4.  Cuboid,  scaphoid,  and  osternal  cuueiform.  From  Chnrch  Buttes.  Haytlcn's  collection. 
Fig.  5.  Metatarsal.     Found  by  Dr.  Corsou  near  Fort  Bridger. 
Fig.  6.  First  phalanx.     Found  by  Dr.  Carter  ou  Henry's  Fork  of  Green  River. 
Fig.  7.  Second  phalanx.    Found  by  Dr.  Carter  near  Fort  Bridger. 

Fig.   8.   PAL.E0SYOPS   MAJOR  : 

Portion  of  the  right  ramus  of  a  lower  jaw,  one-half  size.  The  specimen  is  somewhat  swollen 
and  altered  in  character  from  disease,  and  is  one  of  those  ui^on  which  the  sjiecies  was  first 
indicated.    Discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  at  Grizzly  Buttes. 

Figs.  9-11.  MERYCOCHOiRUS   RU.STICUS.    Natural  size.    From   Hayden's  collection  of  the  Sweetwater 
River. 

Fig.  9.  Lower  extremity  of  the  right  tibia,  front  view. 
Fig.  10.  Astragalus  of  the  right  side,  upper  view. 
Fig.  11.  Calcaueum  of  the  right  side,  upper  view. 

Fig.  12.  Merycochcerus(?)    Natural  size. 

Lower  end  of  the  right  tibia  of  a  smaller  species  than  the  preceding,  with  the  specimens  of 
which  it  was  found.  • 

Fig.  13.  Hipparion(?)    Natural  size. 

Eight  cuneiform  bone,  ujiper  view,*of  a  small  equine  animal.     Specimen  found  with  the 

remains  of  Merycochaerus  just  indicated. 
Figs.  14-22.  Remains  from  Texas,  submitted  to  examination   l>y  Professor  S.  B.  Buckley. 

All  of  the  natural  size. 

Fig.    14.   HlPPARipN    SPECIOSUM  (?) 

Last  upper  molar  of  the  right  side ;  view  of  the  triturating  surface.  From  Washington 
County. 

Fig.  15.  HipPARiON  (f) 

A  third  or  fourth  upper  molar  of  the  left  side.     Found  witli  the  preceding  specimen. 

Fig.  16.  Protoiiippu.s  perditus  (?) 

A  second  or  third  upper  molar  of  the  right  side.     From  Independence,  Washington  County. 

Figs.    17,   18.   PRbTOHIPPUS   PLACIDUS(?) 

Fig.  17.  A  third  or  fourth  upper  molar  of  the  right  side.     Found  in  association  with  the 

specimens  of  Figs.  14,  15. 
Fig.  18.  A  first  upper  molar  of  the  right  side,  probably  of  the  same  species  as  the  former. 

From  Bastrop  County. 

Fig.  19.  ANCiiiTriERiUM('?)  australe: 

First  upper  molar  of  the  right  side.     Found  in  association  with  the  specimen  of  Fig.  Ifi. 

FFg.  20.  Protohippos  : 

A  lower  molar  of  the  riglit  side.     From  Navarro  County. 


PLATE   XX. 


Fig.  21.  Procamelus  (?) 

A  first  or  second  upper  molar  of  tho  left  side,  view  of  thi;  triturating  surface.  Specimen 
found  iu  associatiou  with  those  of  Fig.  14, 1.5,  aud  17,  in  Washiugtou  Couuty. 

Fig.  22.  Astragalus  of  tho  left  side,  upper  view,  probably  of  the  same  species  as  the  last,  and  found 
with  it. 

Fig.   23.    HlPPAI!ION(?)   I'AUVIILUS 

A  coronary  boue,  or  second  phalanx,  of  the  natural  size.     Fonnd  at  Antelope,  Nebraska. 

Fig.  24.   FeLIS  AUGUSTUS  ? 

Distal  extremity  of  the  right  humerus,  front  view,  one-half  size.  Specimen  found  on  tho 
Niobrara  River,  by  Professor  Hayden.  , 

Figs.  25,  £6.  Hyraciivus  aguarius.  From  a  specimen  obtained  by  Dr.  Carter  at  Grizzly  Buttes. 
Natural  size. 

Fig.  25.  Left  ramus  of  tho  lower  jaw,  containing  the  back  two  premolars  and  the  two  suc- 
ceeding molars. 

Fig.  26.  View  of  the  triturating  surface  of  the  same  teeth,  with  the  addition  of  part  of  the 
second  premolar. 


n.  S.   Geci.igical  Surtey  of  the  I'trritones 


"Plab-  XX 


Tho  «.  S  incloir  &  Son ,  Uth .  Phila . 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE   XXI. 


Figs.    1-4.   M.\STODON   OBSCURDS: 

Last  lower  molar  of  the  left  side,  natural  size.  Specimen  discovered  by  Dr.  Lorenzo  G- 
Yates,  in  Contra  Costa  County,  California,  and  now  in  the  museum  of  Amherst  College. 

Fig.  1.  View  of  the  triturating  surface. 

Fig.  2.  Outer  view*f  the  same  sjiecimen. 

Fig.  3.  Fragment  of  a  tusk,  two-thirds  the  natural  size,  exhibiting  the  broad  band  of  enamel 
indicated  by  the  darljer  shade.  Specimen  found  by  Dr.  Yates  in  Stanislaus  County,  Cal- 
ifornia, and  belonging  to  Amherst  CoUege  museum. 

Fig.  4.  Outline  of  the  transverse  section  from,  the  smaller  end  of  the  same  specimen,  of  the 
natural  size. 


U.  S    (;»>oloyioal  Survey  of  thp  I'erriLotiuo. 


PlateXXI 


:,p. 


-^■-■■.^^'■'^^■?-^«a>«^"'-.'-'  -!;r^i 


SIMCLAiH   *    SO 


1  t.    MASTODON,  CONTRA  COSTA  COijN"^Y,  CAl.   |   ,3,4   MASTODON,  STANISLAUS  COUNTY,  CAL, 


EXPLANATION    OF   PLATE   XXII. 


Fig.  1-4.  Mastodon  obscurus: 

Fragments  of  a  lower  jaw,  from  near  Santa  F6,  New  Mexico,  presented  to  the  Smithsonian 
Institution  by  W.  F.  M.  Arny. 

Fig.  1.  Portion  of  the  jaw  containing  the  greater  part  of  the  last  molar  tooth.  Fig.  2.  Por- 
tion of  the  symphysis.  The  two  fragments  placed  in  their  relative  position,  and  reduced 
to  one-sixth  the  natural  size. 

Fij;.  3.  Inferior  view  of  the  symphysial  fragment,  exhibiting  exposed  portions  of  the  incis- 
ors.    One-fourth  the  natural  size. 

Fig  4.  The  last  inferior  molar,  uatur.il  size,  seen  on  the  triturating  surface.  The  back  i)or- 
tion,  consisting  of  another  division  and  the  heel,  are  broken  away. 

Figs.  5,  6.  Mastodon  AMEin.CANUS.     Au  anomalous  molar  tooth,  natural  size. 
Fig.  5.  View  of  the  triturating  surface. 
Fig.  G.  Side  view. 

Fig.  7.  GitAPHiODON  viNKAitius.     A  tooth  of  the  natural  size.     Specimen  from  the  Miocene  of  Slartha's 
Vineyard,  belonging  to  the  museum  of  the  Smithsonian  Institution. 


T7.  S.  GeoloHK^al  Survey  oT  the  Temt«ne« 


Plate  ZXII. 


r\y 


m 


"3"    ^1 


*  w  m 


.-!     ^/, 


.'    n 


.*- 


T*>V 


.J^^' 


ThoK.  .SinddirJb  >bil.  JitlL.Ftula.. 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE   XXIII. 


All  the  figures  of  the  iiatui'al  size  except  Fii;.  16,  which  is  one-half  size. 

Figs.    1,  2.   PALiEOSYOPS   MAJOR : 

Fig.  1.  The  complete  series  of  molar  teeth  of  the  left  side  of  the  lower  jaw,  except  the  drst 

premolar.     The  second  and  tliird  premolars  are  reversed  from  those  of  the  opposite  side. 

Specimen  discovered  hy  Dr.  Carter  in  Dry  Creek  Canon,  forty  miles  from  Fort  Bridger. 
Fig.  2.  A  series  consisting  of  the  molars  and  last  two  premolars  contained  in  detached 

fragments  of  a  lower  jaw.     Specimens  obtained  by  Dr.  Carter  ou  Dry  Creek.     Tlie  molars 

are  larger  and  more  worn  than  in  the  preceding  specimen. 

Figs.  3-6.  Pai-.s;osyops   paludosus.  '  Specimens  ui>on  which  the  species  was  originally  established. 
Hayden's  collection  of  1870. 
Fig.  3.  A  third  lower  premolar  of  the  left  side. 
Fig.  4.  A  last  lower  premolar  of  the  right  side. 
Fig.  .5.  A  first  lower  molar  of  the  left  side. 
Fig.  6.  Anterior  part  of  a  second  upper  molar  of  the  left  side. 

Figs.  7-11.  Pal^eosyops  ma.iok.     Specimens  found  by  Dr.  Corson  in  Dry  Creek  Cauon. 
Fig.  7.  The  left  upper  canine  tooth. 
Fig.  8.  The  second  upper  premolar  of  the  left  side. 
Fig.  9.  The  last  upper  premolar  of  the  same  side. 
Fig.  10.  The  second  npjier  molar  of  the  same  side. 
Fig.  11.  The  last  upper  molar  of  the  same  side. 

Fig.  12.  Pal^osyops  major  : 

Series  of  premolars  from  the  second  to  the  last,  inclusive,  of  the  right  side.    From  Dry 
Creek.     Dr.  Carter. 

Fig.  13.  Pai..«:osyops  (Limnohyus)  i.aticeps(?) 

A  second  upper  molar  of  the  right  side.     A  comparatively  smooth  tooth.     Specimen  discov- 
ered by  Dr.  Corson,  in  association  with  the  large  canine  tooth  of  Figs.  1-3,  Plate  XXV. 

Figs.  14-10.  Pal^osyoes  majok: 

Fig.  14.  A  last  lower  molar  of  the  right  side.    Contained  in  a  jaw  fragment  obtained  by 

Dr.  Carter  at  Dry  Creek  Canon. 
Fig.  15.  An  inferior  incisor,  lateral  view,  belonging  to  the  same  individual  as  the  specimens 

of  Figs.  7-11. 
Fig.  16.  Upper  view  of  a  cranium,  one-half  the  natural  size.     The  specimen  discovered  by 

Dr.  Carter  at  Dry  Creek  Canon. 


U.  S.  G.eDlogical  Surrey  of  the  Tern  ton 


Plate  XXai, 


PALAEOSYOPS. 


IhoK  SiiirldtrJc  San.  lith.Pliila. 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE    XXIV. 


Figs.  1-5.  Pal^osyops  major  : 

Fig.  1.  View  of  a  left  side  of  a  ccauium,  oue-lialf  the  natural  size.  Specimen  discovered  by 
Dr.  Carter  on  the  bnttes  of  Dry  Creek  Canon. 

Fig.  2.  View  of  the  left  side  of  a  crushed  facial  specimen,  one-half  the  natural  size.  Speci- 
men found  by  a  Shoshone  Indian,  and  brought  to  Dr.  Carter. 

Fig.  3.  View  of  the  triturating  surfixce  of  a  penultimate  upper  molar  of  the  riglit  side, 
natural  size.    From  the  same  skull  as  Fig.  1. 

Fig.  4.  Portion  of  the  right  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw  of  the  same  animal,  one-half  the  natural 
size. 

Fig.  .5.  Au  upper  lateral  incisor,  natural  size.  Specimen  found  by  Dr.  Corson  in  the  buttes 
of  Dry  Creek  Canon. 

Figs.  6,  7.  Pal^osyops  paludosus  (?)    Natural  size. 

Fig.  0.  Fore  part  of  the  upper  jaw,  containing  the  first  three  premolars  and  part  of  the  fang 

of  the  caniuft. 
Fig.  7.  Triturating  surfaces  of  the  premolars. 

Fig.  8.  Paljeo-Syops  humilis  : 

A  last  upper  molar  of  the  left  side,  natural  size.  Found  by  Dr.  Corson  on  the  buttes  of  Dry 
Creek  Canon. 


;.  a    G;eoJogieal  Survey  ol'  lLo  IViritories 


Plate  XXTV. 


ThV  SiHcUjr  *  SoB.PinJa. 


PAL AEO STOPS. 


EXPLANATION    OF   PLATE   XXV. 


UiNTATiiEniCM  ROBUSTUM.     All  the  Specimens  discovered  by  Drs.  Corson  and  Carter  at  Dry 
Creek  Canon.     Natural  size,  excei)t  Figs.  8  and  11,  which  are  one-half  size. 

Figs.  1-5.  A  supposed  upper  canine  tooth.  Discovered  by  Dr.  Corson  in  comj)any  with  a  fragment  of  the 
same  tooth  of  the  other  side,  the  specimen  reprcsente<l  in  Figs.  13,  14,  and  the  molar  of 
Palajosyops  represented  in  Fig.  13,  Plate  XXIII.  Originally  referred  to  a  supposed  car- 
nivore, with  the  name  of  Uiniamastix  atrox. 

Fig.  1.  Outer  view  of  the  right  canine.  The  restored  outline  of  the  lance-head-like  point 
is,  perhaps,  a  little  exaggerated. 

Fig.  2.  Inner  view  of  the  point  of  the  same  specimen. 

Fig.  3.  Front  view. 

Fig.  4.  Outline  of  a  transverse  section  of  the  lance-head-'like  point. 

Fig.  5.  Outline  of  a  section  near  tho  base  of  the  specimen. 

Figs.  6-12.   Specimens  found  together,  with  portions  of  the  skull  and  other  boues  of  the  skeletou,  ten 
miles  distant  from  the  former.    Discovered  by  Drs.  Carter  and  Corson. 
Fig.  6.  Inner  view  of  tho  last  upper  molar  of  the  right  side. 
Fig.  7.  View  of  the  triturating  surface  of  the  same  tooth. 

Fig.  8.  Outer  view  of  the  same  tooth  inserted  in  a  jaw-fragment,  half  the  natural  size. 
Fig.  9.  Inner  view  of  the  last  lower  molar  of  the  right  side. 
Fig.  10.  View  of  the  triturating  surface  of  the  same  tooth. 
Fig.  11.    Outer  view  of  the  lower-jaw  fragment,  containing  tho  same  tooth,  one-half  tho 

natural  size. 
Fig.  12.  Triturating  surface,  much  worn,  of  the  first  upper  molar,  of  tho  right  side. 

Figs.  13,  14.  A  supposed  upper  jiremolar  of  the  same  animal.     Discovered  by  Dr.  Corson  in  company  with 
the  large  canine  tooth  of  Figs.  1-5. 
Fig.  13.  Inner  view  of  the  tooth. 
Fig.  14.  Triturating  surface. 


V     S    ^eol'JbT-cal  burveT'  uT  t}it;  Ten;' 


Plate  >;XY. 


UINTATHERIUM 


Tho«.Sl,..l.„ri<S..n-l.lk.Pli>>a. 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE   XXVI. 


Figs.  1-8.   UlNTATHERIDJI  ItOBUSXUM  : 

Fig.  1.  "View  of  the  right  side  of  a  mutilated  cranium,  one-half  the  diameter  of  nature.  Spec- 
imen upon  which  the  genus  was  characterized.  Discovered  by  Dr.  Carter  about  fifty  miles 
from  Fort  Bridger. 

Fig.  2.  An  atlas,  of  the  same  species.     Inferior  view,  one-fourth  the  diameter. 

Fig.  3.  A  right  humerus.  Found  by  Dr.  Carter  in  the  same  locality  as  the  specimen  of  Fig.  1. 
Anterior  view,  one-fourth  the  diameter. 

Fig.  4.  Proximal  extremity  of  a  femur,  probably  pertaining  to  a  larger  species  of  the  same 
genus,  or  perhaps  to  a  larger  variety.    One-fourth  the  diameter. 

Fig.  5.  Distal  extremity  of  another  femur,  probably  of  U.  robustmn.    One-fourth  the  diameter. 

Fig.  6.  Calcaneum  of  the  left  side.     Upjier  view,  one-half  size. 

Figs.  7,  8.  Astragalus,  one-half  size. 

Fig.  7.  Upper  view.     Fig.  8.  Inferior  view. 

Figs.  9,  10.  Hyrachyus  EXinnus : 

Left  lower  iienultimate  molar  tooth,  natural  size. 

Fig.  9.  Outer  view.    Fig.  10.  Upper  view. 

« 

Fig.  11.  Hyrachyus  nano.s  : 

Right  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw,  retaining  the  back  four  molar  teeth.    Natural  size. 


tf.  'S.  Geological  Survey  of  the  Territories 


Plate  XXVT 


■ni"  sir.cUirftSon.Piiila. 


1-8  UINTATHERIUM.    9-11  HYRACHYUS  . 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE   XXVII. 


Figs.  1,  2.   HiPPOSYUS   FOIiMOSUS : 

Au  upper  luolar  tootb,  probably  tbo  seoouil  true  molar  of  tbo  loft  sido,  maguified  tbroe 

diameters. 
Fig.  1.  Outer  view  of  the  crown. 
Fig.  2.  View  of  the  triturating  surface. 

Figs.  3,  4.  Wash.\kius  insignis  : 

Fig.  3.  Portion  of  tbo  rigbt  ramus  of  tbo  lower  jaw,  containing  tbo  last  two  molars,  magni- 
fied three  diameters. 
Fig.  4.  View  of  tbo  triturating  surfaces  of  the  teeth,  magnified  eight  diameters. 

Fig.  5.   HYOP.SODUS  MINUSCULOS  : 

View  of  tbo  triturating  surfaces  of  the  last  premolar  and  the  molars  of  the  left  side,  m.agni- 
fied  four  diameters. 

Figs.  G-10.  UixTACyoN  edax  : 

Fig.  C.  Right  side  of  the  lower  jaw,  containing  the  intermediate  three  premolars,  part  of  the 
first  molar,  and  the  second  molar,  natural  size. 

Figs.  7-10.  The  teeth,  magnified  three  diameters. 

Fig.  7.  Triturating  surface  of  tbo  second  molar. 
Fig.  8.  Outer  view  of  the  same  tooth. 
Fig.  9.  Upper  view  of  the  premolars. 
Fig.  10.  Outer  view  of  the  same. 

Figs.  1 1-13.   UlNTACYON   VORAX  : 

Fig.  11.  Fragment  of  the  left  side  of  the  lower  jaw,  containing  part  of  the  first  molar  and 

the  second  molar,  natural  size. 
Fig.  12.  lTi>per  view  of  the  secoud  molar. 
Fig.  13.  Oater  view  of  the  second  molar. 

Figs.  14,  15.  Mysops  featernus  : 

Fig.  14.  Eight  side  of  lower  jaw,  with  tbo  last  three  molars,  maguified  two  diameters. 
Fig.  15.  View  of  the  triturating  surfaces  of  tbo  molars,  magnified  eight  diameters. 

Figs.  16-18.  Paramys  delicatior  : 

Fig.  16.  Lower  molar  of  the  rigbt  side,  the  second  or  third  of  tbo  series,  seen  on  tbo  tritu- 
rating surface,  magnified  three  diameters. 

Fig.  17.  U[)per  molars  of  the  same  animal,  ajipareutly  the  intorraediatc  pair.  Outer  view, 
magnified  three  diameters. 

Fig.  18.  View  of  the  triturating  surfaces  of  the  same  teeth,  maguified  three  diametens. 

Figs.  19,  20.  MiCROSY'OPS  (?) 

An  upper  molar  tooth,  magnified  four  times. 

Fig.  19.  Outer  view. 

Fig.  20.  View  of  the  triturating  surface. 

Figs.  21,  22.  Hyraciiyus  nanus  (?) 

A  last  upper  premolar,  magnified  two  diameters. 

Fig.  21.  Outer  view. 

Fig.  22.  View  of  the  triturating  surface. 


PLATE     XXVII. 


Fig.  23.  Fragment  of  tbo  left  side  of  the  lower  jaw,  coutainiug  two  premolars,  apparently  the  third  and 
fourth,  of  au  undetermined  carnivore,  natural  size.  From  the  Bridger  Eocene  of  Wyo- 
ming. 

Figs.  24,  25.  Megalomeryx  niobrarensisC?)  A  lower  molar  tooth,  natural  size.  From  the  Tertiary  of 
L'Eau  qui  Court  County,  Nebraska.     Sjiecimeu  in  the  museuin  of  Swarthmore  College. 

Fig.  24.  Triturating  surface. 
Fig.  25.  Outer  view. 

Figs.  26-29.   PROCA.MELUS  viRGiNiENSis.    Natural  size.    Specimens  from  the  Miocene  of  Virginia,  and 
belonging  to  Mr.  C.  M.  Smith,  of  Richmond,  Virginia. 
Fig.  26.  Outer  view  of  the  last  lower  molar  of  the  right  side. 
Fig.  27.  Triturating  surface  of  the  same. 

Fig.  28.  The  last  premolar  and  first  molar  of  the  right  side,  outer  view. 
Fig.  29.  Triturating  surfaces  of  the  same. 

Figs.  30-34.  Uesitatherium  robostcm  : 

Fig.  30.  Last  upper  molar  of  the  right  side,  (juter  view,  natural  size. 

Fig.  31.  Last  lower  molar  of  the  right  side,  outer  view,  natural  size. 

Fig.  32.  Portiou  of  the  left  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw,  one-half  the  natural  size.  .  Fig.  33.  Mu- 
tilated corouoid  and  condyle  of  the  same  specimen  as  the  former. 

Fig.  34.  Upper  view  of  the  atlas,  from  the  same  specimen  as  Fig.  2,  Plate  XXVI,  one-fourth 
the  diameter  of  nature. 

Fig.  35.  Saniwa  ensidens.    Tooth  magnified  eight  diameters. 

Figs.  36,37.  Saniwa  major: 

Two  dorsal  vertebra?,  natural  size. 
Fig.  36.  Inferior  view. 
Fig.  37.  View  of  right  side. 

Figs.  38, 39.  Chameleo  pristin0S.    Fragment  of  the  lower  jaw,  magnified  three  diameters. 

Fig.  36.  Outer  view. 

Fig.  39.  Inner  view. 

Fig.  40.  Undetermined  tooth  of  a  reptile,  magnified  two  diameters.  From  the  Bridger 
Eocene  formation  of  Wyoming.  It  may  be  the  tooth  of  a  crocodile  or  a  lacertian.  It  is 
an  isolated  specimen,  partially  imbedded  in  a  greenish  sandstone,  with  fresh-water  shells. 
The  crown  is  compressed  mammillary,  and  strongly  striate,  from  an  acute-bordered  summit. 


n.  S.  Geological  Survey  of  the  Territories 


Plate  XXVU. 


d^^ 


liiV  Sinclair  tSon,Eltfla 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE   XXVIII. 


Figs.   1,  2.   UlNTATHEUIUM  KOBUSTOM  : 

Fig.  1.  Outline  talieu  from  Professor  Marsh's  Fig.  1,  Plate  II,  of  Dinoceras  mirahilis,  iu  the 
Am.  Jour.  Science,  1873,  enlarged  so  as  to  accord  with  one-sixth  of  the  size  of  the  frag- 
ments introduced  iu  the  figure,  which  corresi^ond  with  those  of  Figs.  1  and  8,  Plate  XXV, 
and  Fig.  1,  Plate  XXVI. 

Kg.  2.  View  of  the  base  of  the  cranial  specimen  also  represented  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  XXVI. 
One-sixth  the  diameter  of  nature. 

Fig.  3.  Large  osseous  i>rotuberance,  one-half  the  size  of  nature,  resembling  the  similar 
osseous  protuberances  of  the  specimen  of  Megaccrops,  represented  in  Figs.  2, 3,  Plate  1. 
The  specimen  is  from  the  Mauvaises  Terres  of  White  River,  Dakota,  and  was  originally 
suspected  to  belong  to  Titanotherium. 

Figs.  4-8.  Bison  latifrons: 

Figs.  4, 5.  Cranium  from  Pilarcitos  Valley,  California,  discovered  by  Messrs.  Calvin  and 
Wilfred  Brown,  and  presented  to  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadeli^hia.  One- 
fifth  the  natur.al  size. 

Fig.  4.  Upper  view.    Fig.  5.  Posterior  view. 

Figs.  6, 7.  The  second  and  last  npper  molars  seen  on  their  triturating  surfaces.  Natural  size. 
Specimens  from  California,  belonging  to  Wabash  College,  Indiana. 

Fig.  8.  An  upper  second  molar  of  the  left  side,  considerably  worn,  and  seen  on  its  triturat- 
ing surface.    Natural  size.    From  Luzerue  County,  Pennsylvania. 

Fig.  9.  Mastodon  americanxjs: 

A  first  lower  premolar  of  the  right  side,  natural  size.     Found  with  the  iirecediug. 


rr   S.  Geological  Survey  of  the  Temtones. 


Plate     XXVm 


/ 


g^,. 

^^;'' 

V-~i..rr.r-. 

fW 

''■'■<^m 

m 

Ai 


Wt'-.!- 


Ih?  SmcUul  it  Soi\  iith .  flu  la . 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE  XXIX. 


All  the  figures  one-balf  the  natural  size. 

Fig.   1.  TkIOXYX  UlNTitENSIS  : 

The  nearly  entire  carapace  or  upper  shield,  partially  represented.  Specimen  discovered  by 
Major  Kobert  S.  La  Motte,  in  the  buttes  of  Dry  Creek,  ten  miles  from  Fort  Bridger,  and 
presented  by  him  to  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia. 

Figs.  2-4.  Testudo  Uoksoni: 

Specimens  discovered  by  Dr.  Joseph  K.  Corson,  in  association  with  portions  of  the  plastron, 

and  the  specimen  of  the  carapace  represented  in  Fig.  1,  Plate  XXX. 
Fig.  2.  Anterior  view  of  the  proximal  extremity  of  the  right  humerus. 
Fig.  3.  Outer  view  of  the  same  specimen. 
Fig.  4.  Distal  extremity  of  the  right  femur,  front  view. 

Fig.  5.  Paljeosyops  paludosus: 

Femur  of  the  left  side,  anterior  view.    Specimen  obtained  by  Dr.  Carter  on  Grizzly  Buttes. 


U.S.  CeologicalSurveTof  il'.^  Terntori.e.'! 


Plate  XXK. 


fetiiii^    l'^    '  ^  ^' 


{ 


V  ,  ^ 


A  .9 


\f 


Til*'  SincUir  fcSsn.PhTi 


iTRlONYXUlNTAENSrS.     2^4TESTUD0   CORSONI  .  5.PAIJ\K0SYOHS  PALUDOSUS- 


EXPLANATION    OF   PLATE    XXX. 


Figs.  1-4.  Testudo  Coksoni  : 

Fig.  1.  Intermeilinte  portion  of  tbo  carapace,  one-half  the  natural  size,  exhibit-inn;  the  series 
of  vertebral  jilates,  from  the  first  to  the  eighth  and  part  of  the  ninth,  and  contiguous  por- 
tions of  the  costal  plates.  Specimen  cliscovered  by  Dr.  Joseph  K.  Corson  on  the  buttes  of 
Dry  Creek,  and  jux'sented  hy  him  to  the  Academy  of  Philadelphia. 

Fig.  2.  Plastron,  or  lower  shield,  one-third  the  natural  size.  Specimen  discovered  by  Dr. 
Corson  ou  Grizzly  Buttes,  and  presented  to  the  Academy. 

Fig.  3.  Anterior  i)rocess  of  another  plastron,  one-half  the  natural  size.  From  a  specimen 
discovered  by  Dr.  Corson  in  the  same  locality  as  the  last. 

Fig.  4.  Anterior  process  of  a  nearly  complete  plastron,  one-half  the  natural  size.  From  a 
specimen  discovered  by  Mrs.  Dr.  Carter  on  the  buttes  of  Dry  Creek,  and  presented  by  her 
to  the  Academy  of  Philadelphia. 

I'ig.   5.   CLADOCYCLUS  OCCIDENT^iXlS  : 

Large  scale,  imbedded  in  a  lead-colored  calcareous  shale,  natural  size.  Specimen  obtained 
by  Professor  Hayden  from  the  Cretaceous  formation  of  Sage  Creek,  Dakota. 


U  S  Geological  S uivey  of  the Terrilories 


Plate   XXX. 


IV;  Sircliui  4  Soo.PlDJa. 


1-4    TESTUDO  CORSONI. 


5. CLADOCYCLUS. 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE   XXXL 


Fig.  1.  Eestorecl  skull  of  PaJocosyops.  The  cranium  ami  face  arc  introduced  from  the  specimens  of 
Figs.  1,  2,  Plate  XXIV,  and  Fig.  51,  Plate  XVIII;  and  the  lower  jaw  from  the  specimen  of 
Fig.  52  of  the  latter  plate,  and  Fig.  4,  Plate  XXIV.  About  half  the  natural  size  of  the 
skull  of  P.  paludosus. 

Fig.  2.  Canis  indlvnensis  : 

Right  ramus  of  the  lower  jaw,  one-half  the  natural  size.  Specimen  from  San  Leaudro,  Cali- 
fornia. Discovered  by  Dr.  Lorenzo  G.  Yates,  and  now  in  the  museum  of  Wabash  College, 
Crawfordsville,  Indiana. 

Fig.   3.   FeLIS  IMPBRIALIS  : 

Fore  part  of  the  upper  jaw,  with  the  second  premolar,  one-half  the  natural  size.  Accom- 
panying the  preceding  specimen. 

Fig.  4.  LuTRA  pisciNjVRia: 

Tibia  of  the  right  side,  two-thirds  the  natural  size.  From  Sinker  Creek,  Idaho,  and  belong- 
ing to  the  Smithsonian  Institution. 


'Z .    S-   G.eoJogical  SurvsY  of  the  Terntonee 


Plate  XXXI . 


Th'»  aiidaii  &  Son.  liUi .  Phila 


EXPLANATION    OF   PLATE   XXXII. 


All  tbc  figures  of  the  natural  size. 

Figs.  1-G.  Ajiia  (Pcotamia)  uintaensis: 

Fig.  1.  Centrum  of  .1  dorsal  vertebra,  auterior  view.     Fig.  2.  View  of  the  same  beneath. 

From  Dry  Creek  Canon. 
Fig.  3.  Centrnra  of  an  atlas,  auterior  view.     Fig.  4.  Inferior  view  of  the  same.    From  Dry 

Creek  Cauou. 
Fig.  5.  A  series  of  three  posterior  dorsal  centra,  inferior  view.    From  Dry  Creek  Canon. 
Fig.  6.  Basi  occipital,  posterior  view.    Fig.  fia.  Inferior  view  of  the  same.    From  Dry  Creek. 

Figs.  7-11.  Amia  (Pkotamia)  media  : 

Fig.  7.  Centrum  of  a  dorsal  vertebra,  upper  view.     Fig.  8.  Posterior  view.    Fig.  9.  fcferior 

view.    Junction  of  Sandy  and  Green  Elvers. 
Fig.  10.  Centrum  of  a  posterior  dorsal  vertebra,  back  view.     Fig.  11.  Inferior  view.     Dry 

Creek. 

Figs.  18,  13.  Lepidosteus  notabilis: 

Fig.  12.  Centrum  of  a  dorsal  vertebra,  inferior  view.    Fig.  13.  Posterior  view.     From  near 
Washakie,  Wj-oming. 

Figs.  14, 15.  Lepidosteus  atkox  : 

Fig.  14.  Centrum  of  an  auterior  dorsal  vertebra,  inferior  view.     Fig.  15.  Posterior  view. 
From  the  junction  of  Big  Sandy  and  Green  Rivers. 

Figs.  16,  17.  Lepidosteus  (?)    See  page  190. 

Fig.  16.  Centrum  of  a  posterior  dorsal  vertebra,  seen  beneath. 
Fig.  17.  Posterior  view  of  the  same.' 

Fig.  18.  Lepidosteus  simplex: 

The  basi.occipital  and  three  vertebral  centra,  scon  beneath.    From  near  Washakie  Station, 
Wyoming. 

Figs.  19-22.  Hypamia  elegans.     A  vertebral  centrum.    From  Dry  Creek. 

Fig.  19.  Upper  view.    Fig.  20.  Lateral  view.    Fig.  21.  Posterior  view.    Fig.  22.  Inferior 

view. 

Figs.  23,24.  Amia  (Protamia)  cnAClLis.    A  centrum  from  near  tho  middle  of  the  dorSl  scries.     Henry's 
Fork  of  Green  Elver,  Wyoming. 
Fig.  23.  Posterior  view.    Fig.  24.  Inferior  view. 

Fig.  25.  Lepidosteus  (?) 

Fragment  of  the  right  dentary  bone.     See  jiage  190. 

Fig.  26.  Lepidosteus  simplex.    A  tooth.    See  page  191. 

Figs.  27-30.  Lepidosteus  (?)    Scales  from  Big  Sandy  and  Green  Eivor. 

Figs.  31-34.  Lepidosteus  simplex.     Scales.    From  near  Washakie  Station.     See  page  191. 

Figs.  35-38.  Lepidosteus.     Scales.     Little  Sandy  Creek.     See  page  192. 

Figs.  39-42.  Lepidosteus.    Scales.    Near  Fort  Bridger. 

Fig.  43.  Lepidosteus.    Scah^.    Sco  page  192. 


PLATE    XXXII. 


Figs.   44-4G.   PlMELODU.S  ANTIQUUS: 

Figs.  44,  45.  Fragments  of  iieotoral  spines. 

Fig.  4G.  Portion  of  a  dentary  bone,  seen  from  bouoath. 

Figs.  47-51.  Phaeeodus  acutus.    Jaw  fragments,  from  the  junction  of  Big  Sandy  and  Green  Rivers, 
Wyoming. 
Fig.  47.  Portion  of  tlie  right  xiremaxillary. 
Fig.  48.  Portion  of  left  jiremaxillary. 
Fig.  49.  Portion  of  right  dentary. 
•  Fig.  50.  Portion  of  left  dentary. 

Fig.  51.  Portion  of  a  maxillary. 

.Figs.  52,  53.  Trygon  (?).  Caudal  spine  of  a  Eay,  From  the  Miocene  of  Virginia.     Fig.  52.  Anterior  view 
of  basal  portion  of  the  spine.    Fig.  53.  Section  of  the  same.    Belonging  to  Mr.  C.  M.  Smith. 

Figs.  54,  55.  Myliobates  (?).  Caudal  spine.    Found  with  the  preceding. 
Fig.  54.  Anterior  face  of  basal  portion. 
Fig.  55.  Section  of  the  same. 

Figs.  56,  57.  Pkotautoga  conidens  : 

Portions  of  premaxillaries,  with  tooth,  from  tbc  Miocene  of  Virginia.     Belonging  to  C.  M. 

Smith. 
Fig.  56.  Fragment  of  the  left  prcmaxillary,  eoutaiuiug  the  lirst  tooth. 
Fig.  57.  Right  premaxillary,  inner  view,  exhibiting,  besides  the  outer  row  of  large  teeth,  an 

inner  row  of  small  ones. 

Fig.  58.  ACIPfiNSER  ORNATUS: 

A  dermal  plate.    From  the  Miocene  of  Virginia.    Belonging  to  Mr.  C.  M.  Smith. 

Fig.   59.   AsTERjiCjUStTIIUS  SIDERIUS: 

Basal  portion  of  an  ichthyodorulite,  lateral  view. 


TJ.  S  Geological  Survey  of  the  Territories. 


Plate  XXXE  - 


<1-hi 


,    «11M;1 


ii%Mii 


mi' 


'/ 


'TF 


56 


r-'0^ 


59 


y    J> 


ill'.*  jinclsdr  ISon.  PHl^. 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE  XXXIII. 


All  the  figures  of  tho  uatiiial  size. 

Figs.  1,  2.  Equus  occidentalis  : 

Fig.  1.  The  anterior  four  upper  molars  of  the  left  side,  seen  on  their  triturating  surfaces. 

The  teeth  are  contained  in  a  jaw-fragment,  obtained  by  Dr.  George  H.  Horn  from  an 

asphaltum  deposit  near  Bueua  Vista  Lake,  California..     Specimen  in  the  museum  of  the 

Academy  of  Philadelphia. 
Fig.  2.  A  second  upper  left  molar,  seen  on  the  triturating  surface.    From  Tuolumne  County 

California. 

Figs.  3-18.  Equus  major: 

Figs.  3,  4.  A  first  upper  molar  tooth  of  the  right  side.  Fig.  3.  Outer  view.  Fig.  4.  Tritu- 
rating surface.     Specimen  from  Hardin  County,  Texas. 

Figs.  5,  6.  A  first  upper  molar  of  the  right  side.  Fig.  5.  Outer  view.  Fig.  6.  Triturating 
surface.    From  Illinois  Blufl's,  Missouri. 

Figs.  7,  8.  A  last  upper  molar  of  the  right  side.  Fig.  7.  Outer  view.  Fig.  8.  Triturating 
surface.    From  Hardin  County,  Texas. 

Fig.  9.  A  last  lower  molar  of  the  left  side,  view  of  the  triturating  surface.  Found  with  the 
last. 

Fig.  10.  A  fifth  lower  molar  of  the  left  side,  triturating  surface.     Found  with  the  last. 

Fig.  11.  A  second  or  third  upper  molar  of  the  right  side,  triturating  surface.  From  Galves- 
ton Bay,  Texas.     Presented  to  the  Academy  by  Dr.  Tbomas  H.  Streets. 

Fig.  12.  A  first  lower  temporary  molar,  triturating  surface.     From  Hardin  County,  Texas. 

Fig.  13.  An  upper  last  temporary  molar  of  the  left  side.    Found  with  the  last. 

Fig.  14.  An  upper  second  or  third  molar  of  the  left  side.  From  the  "phospbate  beds"  of 
Ashley  Eiver,  South  Carolina. 

Fig.  15.  A  second  or  third  lower  molar  of  the  right  side.     From  the  same  locality  as  the  last. 

Fig.  16.  An  upper  second  or  third  molar  of  tho  right  side.  From  Luzerne  County,  Pennsyl- 
vania. 

Fig.  17.  A  second  lower  moUir  of  the  left  side.     Found  with  the  last. 

Fig.  18.  An  upper  fourth  or  fifth  molar  of  tlie  left  side.     From  Texas. 

Fig.  19.  Equus.  Portion  of  an  upper  molar  of  the  left  side  of  an  undetermined  species.  From  the  lignite 
beds  of  Shoalwater  Bay,  Washington  Territory.  , 

Figs.  20,  21.  Two  phalanges  of  undetermined  animals,  both  fuund,  in  association  with  the  equine  and 
other  remains,  in  an  asphaltum  deposit  in  Hardin  County,  Texas.  They  are  both  satu- 
rated with  bitumen.  Fig.  20.  Lateral  view  of  the  specimen.  Fig.  21.  Inferior  view  of 
the  second  specimen. 


U.   S.   ^trolo^.oal  Siirvpy  cf  the  TerritoTiei* 


Plate  xxxnr. 


Th"  Sindaii  i  Son,  lith .  Phila 


EXPLANATION  OF  PLATE  XXXIV. 


All  the  figures  two-thirds  the  size  of  nature  except  Figs.  12-22,  wliicli  are  of  the  uatural 
size. 

Figs.  1  to  .5  and  10.  Clid.vstes  iNTERMEDins.  From  the  Cretaceous  of  Alabama.  Museum  of  the  Acad- 
emy of  Natural  Sciences. 

Fig.  1.  Outer  view  of  the  fore  part  of  the  left  mandible. 

Fig.  2.  Back  part  of  the  right  inaudible,  outer  view  reversed. 

Fig.  4.  Reserve  tooth,  concealed  in  the  excavated  base  of  the  last  of  the  series  in  the  speci- 
men of  Fig.  1,  seen  from  within. 

Fig.  5.  Reserve  tooth,  concealed  in  the  excavated  base  of  the  second  of  the  series  of  the  same 
specimen,  seen  from  within. 

Figs.  G  to  9  and  11.  Clidastes  affinis.  From  the  Smoky  HiU  Eiver,  of  Kansas.    Belonging  to  the  mu- 
seum of  the  Smithsonian  Institution. 
Fig.  6.  Outer  view  of  the  left  mandible. 

Fig.  7.  Inner  view  of  back  part  of  the  right  mandible,  exhibiting  the  glenoid  articulation. 
Fig.  8.  Upper  view  of  two  fragments  of  the  cranium. 
Fig.  9.  The  basi-spheugid  bone. 

Fig.  10.  C.  Intekmedids.    The  axis  seen  below  and  with  the  fore  part  downward. 

Fig.  11.  C.  AFFINIS.    The  left  humerus,  posterior  view. 

Fig.  12.  Lestosaurus  coryph^us: 

Greater  portion  of  a  palate-bone,  with  teeth,  natural  size.  From  the  Smoky  Hill  Eiver, 
Kansas. 

Fig.  13.  CuDASTES  AFFINIS.    Tooth  contained  withiii  a  jaw-fragiueut.     From  Smoky  Hill  Eiver,  Kansas. 

Fig.  14.  Crown  of  a  similar  tooth.  From  L'Eau  qui  Court  Countj',  Nebraska.  It  is  compressed,  conical, 
curved,  with  acute  borders  and  smooth  surfaces.    Fig.  15.  Section  of  the  same  tooth. 

Figs.  lG-22.  Teeth  of  mosasauroids,  natural  size,  together  with  the  iireceding  specimen  from  L'Eau  qui 
Court  County,  Nebraska.     Presented  to  Swarthmore  College  by  George  S.  Truman. 

Fig.  16.  Crown  of  a  shed  tooth,  with  striated  enamel.  Fig.  17.  Triinsverse  section  of  the 
same,  at  the  base. 

Fig.  18.  Shed  crown  of  a  largo  tooth,  with'striatcd  enamel,  anterior  view. 

Fig.  19.  Shed  crown  of  a  tooth,  with  distinct  subdivisioual  jilaues.  Fig.  20.  Outlhics  of  sec- 
tions of  the  same  at  the  base  and  above  the  base. 

Fig.  21.  Crown  of  another  shed  tooth,  intermediate  in  character  with  the  two  jjreoeding. 
Fig.  22.  Outline  of  a  section  of  the  same  at  the  base.. 


U-   S.   G;eolosical  Survey  of  the  Terntonea 


Plate  XKXIV. 


I 


ThI'ShickuiS.San  hth.ri:i 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE  XXXV. 


All  tho  figures  oue-lialf  the  uatural  size  except  Fig.  14,  which  is  of  the  natural  size. 

Figs.  1-11.  Tylosaurus  dyspblor.  •  Specimens  from  the  Cretaceous  of  New  Mexico,  and  helonging  to 
the  Smithsonian  Institution. 

Fig.  1.  Ai'ticular  ball  of  a  posterior  dorsal  centrum. 

Fig.  2,  3.  Tho  same  of  two  other  specimens,  exhibiting  a  successive  increase  of  compression 

from  above  downward. 
Fig.  4.  Articular  ball  of  a  caudal  centrum. 
Fig.  5.  Left  lateral  view  of  the  same. 

Fig.  6.  Articular  ball  of  a  more  posterior  caudal  centrum.  * 

Fig.  7.  Left  lateral  view  of  the  same  specimen,  exhibiting  the  reduction  iu  the  size  of  the 

diapophysls.  > 

Fig.  8.  Left  lateral  view  of  a  more  posterior  caudal  vertebra,  devoid  of  diapophyses. 
Fig.  9.  Supijosed  femur,  posterior  view. 
Fig.  10.  Supposed  fibula. 
Fig.  11.  Supposed  tibia. 

Figs.  12, 13.  Tylosaukus  proriger.     Specimens    from  the  Cretaceous  of  Kansas,   belonging  to   the 
Smithsonian  Institution. 
Fig.  12.  Extremity  of  the  snout,  or  of  the  premaxillary. 

.Fig.  13.  Posterior  articular  surface  of  the  left  spleuial  bone  of  the  lower  jaw. 
Fig.  14.  Tooth   of  a  mosasauroid,  uatural  size,   from  tho  Cretaceous  of  L'Eau  qui  Court 
County,  Nebraska.    The  crown  is  compressed,  conical,  with  acute  borders  and  smooth  sur- 
faces.   The  base  is  compressed  oval,  and  it  exhibits  on  its  inner  side  a  small  concavity  for 
the  accommodation  of  a  successor. 


^    K    C'eoloni' al  Harvey  of  the  T 


erntones. 


rlateXXXY 


Ih"  Sindau&Sonhth.nnla 


EXPLANATION  OF  PLATE  XXXVI. 


Figs.  1-3.  Tylosaurcs  proriger: 

Figs.  1,2.  A  caudal  vertebra,  one-half  the  natural  size.    From  the  Cretaceous  of  Kansas. 

Smithsonian  lustitution. 
Fig.  1.  Left  lateral  view.    Fig.  2.  Posterior  view. 
Fig.  3.  A  tooth  which  accompanied  the  former  specimen,  lateral  view,  natural  size. 

Figs.  4-14.  Lestosaurus  corypii^us.     All  the  figures  one-half  the  natural  size.     From  the  Cretaceous 

of  Kansas.    Museum  of  the  Smithsonian  Institution. 
Fig.  4.  Inferior  view  of  a  dorsal  vertebra.     Within  the  position  of  the  right  zygapophysis  a 

rudimental  zygosphene  is  observed. 
Fig.  5.  Inferior  view  of  a  second  specimen. 
Fig.  6.  Inferior  view  of  the  body  of  a  cervical  vertebra. 
Fig.  7.  Right  lateral  view  of  another  cervical  vertebra. 
Fig.  8.  Left  lateral  view  of  an  anterior  caudal  vertebra. 
Fig.  9.  Same  view  of  a  more  posterior  specimen. 
Fig.  10.  Posterior  view  of  the  same. 

Fig.  11.  Left  lateral  view  of  the  bodies  of  two  posterior  vertebraj. 
Fig.  12.  Posterior  view  of  the  second  of  the  latter. 
Fig.  13.  Limb-bone,  jirobably  an  ulna  or  a  fibula. 
Fig.  14.  Probably  a  radius  or  a  tibia. 

Fig.  15.  MosASAURUs: 

A  caudal  vertebra,  from  L'Eau  qui  Court  County,  Nebraska.    Museum  of  Swarthmore  Col- 
lege.   Presented  by  George  S.  Truman.    Inferior  view  one-half  the  natural  size. 

Fig.  16.  Tylosaurus  dyspelor.    Inferior  view  of  the  same  caudal  centrum  as  that  of  Fig.  4,  of  the 

preceding  i)late.     Half  the  natural  size. 
Figs.  17-21.  Limb-bones  of  a  turtle,  from  the   Cretaceous  of  Smoky   Hill  Eiver,  Kansas. 

Smithsonian  Institution.    Three-fourths  the  natural  size. 
Fig.  17.  Upper  extremity  of  the  right  humerus,  anterior  view. 
Fig.  IS.  The  right  femur,  anterior  view. 
Fig.  19.  Portion  of  a  left  scapnla,  inverted  in  position.     The  broken  process  to  the  loft  is 

the  precoracoid.     Posterior  view. 
Fig.  20.  Portion  of  the  coracoid.     The  articular  surface  at  the  upper  end  is  for  the  scapula. 
Fig.  21.  Portion  of  an  undetermined  limb-bone.  • 


S     ■.-;■  ~'lt)6^f^3-l  'Survey  of  tbe  Terntonfts 


Plate  XXXyi 


'VW^  Smclait  &  Son,  litli .  iTi-ui 


EXPLANATION   OF  PLATE   XXXVIl". 


Figs.  1-3.  AociiEXiA  iie.sterna: 

Spceimeus  from  the  Quaternary  of  California,  and  belonging    to  the  cabinet  of  Wabasli 

College,  Crawfordsville,  Indiana. 
Fig.  1.  Outer  view  of  tlie  series  of  lower  molar  teeth  of  the  left  side,  one-half  the  natural 

size. 
Fig.  2.  Triturating  surfaces  of  the  same  series,  natural  size. 
Fig.  3.  A  second  upper  molar  of  the  left  side,  view  of  the  triturating  surface,  natural  size. 

Fig.  4.  Bison: 

Last  lower  molar  of  the  left  side,  triturating  surface,  natural  size.     Specimen  fonud  with 
remains  of  Mcgalonijx  Jeffersoiii,  in  Illinois. 

Fig.  5.  AciiODU.s  iiuMius.    Magnifier;  one  and  a  half  times.     A'iew  of  the  tritnrating  surface  of  a  tooth. 
From  the  Cretaceous  of  New  Jersey. 

Figs.  G-12.  I'.D.U'iioDox  MiKiFicu.s.     One-half  the  natural  size.     Specimens  from  the  Cretaceous  of  New 
Jersey,  and  belonging  to  the  cabinet  of  Rutgers  College,  New  Brnnswiek,  New  Jersey. 
Fig.  fi.  Tlie  mandibles  seen  on  tlieir  oralsurt^iee. 
Fig.  7.  Outer  view  of  the  left  niandiljle. 
Fig.  8.  Inni'r  vicT  of  the  left  mandible. 

Fig.  9.  Posterior  outline  of  the  same,  -witli  outlines  of  the  dental  columns.  . 

Fig.  10.  The  maxillaj  seen  on  their  palatine  or  oral  surface. 
Fig.  11.  Outer  view  of  the  left  nuixilla. 
Fig.  12.  Posterior  outline  of  the  same,  with  outlines  of  the  dental  eohunns. 

1  igs.  V^,  II.   Ef.MVLODUS   L.iQUKATL'.S  : 

Left  lower  maxilla,  one-half  the  natural  size. 
Fig.  13.  Oral  surface,  exhibiting  the  dental  tubercle. 

Fig.  14.  Outer  view.     Specimen  from  the  Cretaceous  of  Missi.ssippi,  and  discovered  by  Dr. 
William  Spilhnan. 

Fig.  10.  PoXTOBASiLEU.s  TUHEi;crLATU.s.     Fragment  of  a  tjoth,  with  restored  outline,  natural  size. 

Figs.  If),  IT.  M.VNATCS  INOKN.VTITS.    A    lower  right  molar,  natural   size.     From   the  phosphate  beds  of 
Ashley  Eiver,  South  Carolina. 
Fig.  16.  Upper  view. 
Fig.  17.  Outer  view. 

Figs.  18, 19.  Pycxodus  uobustus.     Tooth  of  the  natural  size. 
Fig.  18.  Triturating  surface. 
Fig.  111.  Posterior  view.     Specimen  from  the  Cretaccons  of  Neu-  .Jersey. 


D     S.   G;eolo6ica.l  Survey  ol'  the  Territories 


Plate  JGCXYII 


Xi"  SincUJr  «:Son.Phii.\ 


*■ 


'''^^^^^^^^h^^^nf^fif^ 


mffT^^f^^^^^^^^  


^^^^^^^r\m^N 


'"1®.t«J?^J*«««,,»Sl, 


iS^iliiViMiiiii&mk 


'>'^^,/*>^'<. 


^hhmA^f\f\K^2k!^ 


'^^N^ 


.^^0,^n/^A^^^O/?. 


-'^"''';:;:'';?s?^^n^^. 


S??^^A^1^/1aA^^^^J/;^aJ??|! 


>fll^>■?'^b^^(:^ 


tMlhlirAGMi 


JW/^a/^A 


'^^^^^A.^ 


'^^.^.A^/^^A/^A^J^r*/*^ 


^^■^/^Or'^'^^^nr^n, 


.AA^AA.A.^^^^^^^^^^''^^^^^^^ 


-,AAnA^n^A^^-..;^AAA^A'^A««s; 


>.^^^^/^/lA^A. 


«sS??s^^!SSSS^ 


fM^ 


z:::^.^.i,',tii?^m^^^i;i^iM^ss^Si 


i,r^r<^f^r\^rf"^'^'0'11^-^'<^: 


MM§«*; 


^^^^n/^^r^An^^/^^^^A^^^Ao^^p«a^;;'^;j:j''A^-- 


^r^f)!^i^^/\rf^^f^f^^^f'!^^^^^rcf!'^^^^ 


r.rrAr'''^r^,rr. 


,/^A^^A/lA 


^^^^Aft/ft': 


^i'Mt?,!.LL^!2^f?'-?'^;' 


^^0^mMh 


/^•^Afl'5, 


^/i/lonno^^^''^"^'^AA/inn 


^uyi/!n/in;>^    ,'t 


««!ies^^ 


'^^^i^^ 


■^mm 


cOnA/^A> 


.«?^K?Sll^^taM«/(fiM 


flrt^^W/WAA/lA 


'^^m^f^f^^^^ 


mmmmm^m^-'^''^^^^^ 


''''%..^^^^ 


,Pf^rix>  .  fP'c     d'i'.^A. 


•Mhl^^hh/!^^^ 


^CVft^^^*^; 


^^^^*^.r^ 


/,. 


'v'-i^^- 


Wm 


i 


3  -tv  -^