Skip to main content

Full text of "Results of the first Joint US-USSR Central Pacific Expedition (BERPAC) : Autumn 1988"

See other formats


RESULTS  OF  THE  FIRST  JOINT 

US— USSR  CENTRAL  PACIFIC 

EXPEDITION  (BERPAC) 


W^r 


** 


Hi 


W-WM^m 


AUTUMN  1988 


UNITED  STATES  DEPARTMENT  OF  THE  INTERIOR  /  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 


OtMCO 


RESULTS  OF  THE  FIRST  JOINT  US-USSR 

CENTRAL  PACIFIC  EXPEDITION 
H  (BERPAC) 


Oi 
1  = 

s>- 
SI 


a 
iP- 
i  un 

!  -D 
:  eO 
i  □ 

I  a 

•  i-^ 
i  a 
:  m 
=  o 


AUTUMN  1988 


\&iQQQS  biCLZ 


Results  of  the  First  Joint 
US-USSR  Central  Pacific  Expedition 
(BERPAC) 

Autum  1988 


John  F.  Turner 
Director,  US  Fish  and 

Wildlife  Service, 
Washington,  DC 


Yuriy  A.  Izrael 
Chairman.  USSR  State 

Committee  for  Hydrometeorology 
Moscow,  USSR 


Harold  J.  O'Connor 

Project  Leader,  USA 

US  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 

Patuxent  Wildlife  Research  Center 

Laurel.    Maryland 


Alia  V.  Tsyban 

Project  Leader,  USSR 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology 

State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology 

Academy  of  Sciences 

Moscow,  USSR 


Copies  of  this  publication  may  be  obtained  from  the  Publications  Unit.  US  Fish  and  Wildlife 
Service,   1 849  C  Street,  NW,  Mail  Stop  130— ARLSQ.  Washington.  DC    20240. 


Suggested  Citation: 

Nagel,  P.  A.    (ed. )  ( 1 992).     Results  of  the  First  Joint  US-USSR  Central  Pacific  Expedition 

(BERPAC),  Autumn  1988.    US  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service.  Washington.  DC. 


Disclaimer: 

The  opinions  and  recommendations  expressed  in  this  report  are  those  of  the  authors  and  do  not  necessarily  reflect  the 
views  of  the  US  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service,  nor  does  the  mention  of  trade  names  constitute  endorsement  or 
recommendation  for  use  by  the  Federal  Government. 


Foreword 


Included  here  in  its  entirety  is  the  BERPAC  Program  paper,  published  in  1991  [J.F.  Turner,  H.J.  O'Connor,  Yu.A.  Izrael,  and 
A.  V.  Tsyban  (eds. )( 1991 )]:  BERPAC — A  Program  for  Long-term  Ecological  Research  of  Ecosystems  of  the  Bering  and  Chukchi 
Seas  and  the  Pacific  Ocean.  National  Fund  for  the  Patuxent  Wildlife  Research  Center,  Bowie,  Maryland].  BERPAC  refers  to 
joint  research  of  the  US  and  USSR  in  the  Bering  Sea  and  central  Pacific  Ocean  since  1 977.  The  Bering  Sea  portion  of  the  project 
has  included  three  joint  research  expeditions  (1977,  1984,  and  1988)  between  the  two  countries.  The  central  Pacific  portion  of 
the  project  was  established  in  1 988  when  the  first  joint  expedition  took  place.  The  central  Pacific  segment,  therefore,  has  not  had 
the  opportunity  to  go  through  the  same  maturing  process  as  that  of  the  Bering  Sea.  As  time  goes  on,  and  research  continues,  goals 
and  objectives  to  be  accomplished  will  be  further  developed.  The  paper  is  included  here  as  a  Foreword  to  show  the  correlation 
with  this  volume 's  sister  monograph.  Results  of  the  Third  Joint  US-USSR  Bering  &  Chukchi  Seas  Expedition  (BERPAC),  Summer 
1988. 

BERPAC 

A  Program  for  Long-term  Ecological  Research  of  Ecosystems  of  the  Bering  and  Chukchi  Seas  and  the  Pacific  Ocean 


Introduction 

Deterioration  of  ecosystems  on  a  large  scale  threatens 
many  functional  equilibria  in  the  biosphere.  This  problem  is 
particularly  urgent  for  the  World  Ocean,  which  is  the  sink  for 
many  different  pollutants  that  can  produce  significant  ecological 
impacts. 

The  ocean  is  able  to  assimilate  a  certain  amount  of 
anthropogenic  compounds  due  to  "self-purification"  without 
visible  deterioration  of  the  ecosystem.  However,  continuous 
increase  in  the  flux  of  pollutants  to  the  ocean  creates  the  need 
for  study  of  the  resistance  of  marine  ecosystems  to  anthropogenic 
impacts.  Investigations  of  ecological  consequences  and 
elucidation  of  causal  relationships  between  the  impact  levels 
and  adverse  biological  effects  are  only  poorly  understood  for 
the  marine  environment.  The  study  of  these  interactions  and 
responses  is  interdisciplinary  in  character  and  covers  different 
fields  of  biology,  ecology,  chemistry,  and  physics  of  the  sea. 

The  dynamics  of  marine  ecosystems,  including  biological 
and  physical  processes  and  biogeochemical  cycles,  are  closely 
related  to  changes  in  the  climate  of  the  Earth.  The  predicted 
global  warming  may  have  a  pronounced  effect  on  certain  vital 
processes  in  the  World  Ocean,  especially  the  resistance  of  its 
ecosystems  to  anthropogenic  contamination.  This  is  because 
the  living  ocean  determines,  to  a  great  degree,  the  normal 
functions  of  the  Earth's  climatic  system. 

Long-term  observations  of  physical,  geochemical,  and 
hydrobiological  processes  are  necessary  for  the  assessment  of 
ecological  consequences  of  contamination  in  the  ocean 
environment  and  isolation  of  local  anthropogenic  effects 
compared  to  the  effect  of  climatic  variability. 

The  Bering  Sea  is  located  between  the  coasts  of  the  Soviet 
Far  East  (USSR)  and  Alaska  (USA),  and  naturally  an  interest 
in  the  study  of  its  ecosystems  has  been  shown  by  Soviet  and 
American  scientists  (Izrael  &  Tsyban,  1983a,  1977,  1990; 
Roscigno,  1990). 

In  spite  of  comprehensive  studies  carried  out  in  the  Bering 
Sea  in  the  last  few  years  (Izrael  etai,  1988b;  Izrael  &  Tsyban, 
1989,  1990;  Coachman,  1990;  Roscigno,  1990),  a  number  of 
the  oceanographic,  hydrochemical.  and  biological  parameters 


determining  its  ecosystem  functions  are  as  yet  poorly  known 
when  compared  with,  for  instance,  the  Baltic,  Mediterranean, 
and  Black  Seas.  For  example,  the  joint  bilateral  program  of 
Bering/Chukchi  investigations  have  been  carried  out  for  more 
than  13  years  with  the  production  of  three  monographs  of 
cruise  results.  However,  the  as  yet  inadequate  data  on  the 
characteristics  and  processes  occurring  in  the  ecosystems  of 
the  Bering  Sea  and  North  Pacific  waters  has  led  to  the 
organization  and  implementation  of  an  international  program: 
Long-term  Ecological  Research  of  Ecosystems  of  the  Bering 
and  Chukchi  Seas  and  the  Pacific  Ocean  (BERPAC  Program). 

Goals,  Objectives,  and  Scientific  Basis  of  the  BERPAC 
Program 

Goals 

The  goal  of  the  BERPAC  Program  is  to  examine  the  status 
of  marine  ecosystems  of  the  Pacific  Ocean,  Bering  Sea,  and 
Chukchi  Sea  and  to  assess  their  role  in  determining  global 
climate.  BERPAC  will  study  the  dynamics  of  these  ecosystems 
related  to  conditions  of  global  climate  change  and  anthropogenic 
contamination. 

Objectives  and  Scientific  Basis  of  the  BERPAC  Program 

Objectives  of  the  BERPAC  Program  consist  of  the  study 
of  the  biogeochemical  cycles  of  contaminants,  related 
oceanographic  processes,  and  food-web  interactions  in  the 
North  Pacific  waters  that  flow  through  the  Bering/Chukchi 
Seas,  including  study  of  the  behavior  of  organic  pollutants  at 
the  water/sediment  interface,  since  sediments  are  sources  of 
the  secondary  pollution  of  ecosystems.  Important  topics  of 
study  are  the  control  and  the  accumulation  of  pollutants  in 
bottom  deposits,  and  the  study  of  their  migration  within  the 
sediments  and  exchange  with  overlying  waters  are  important 
topics  of  study. 

1.    Assessment  of  Ecological  Consequences  of  Contamination 

Progressively  severe  changes  in  chemical  contamination 

of  the  ocean  biosphere  are  on  the  increase.    Anthropogenic 


in 


impacts  influence  not  only  the  biotic  component  of  the  marine 
environment  but  different  abiotic  components  as  well.  Such 
impacts  lead  to  even  more  significant  changes  in  the  World 
Ocean  and  in  the  biosphere  as  a  whole. 

Specific  features  of  the  Bering  Sea  and  other  ecosystems 
w  ith  "background"  levels  of  contamination  are  such  that  they 
are  especially  vulnerable  because  of  the  continual  input  of 
small  doses  of  pollution.  This  leads  to  a  gradual  accumulation 
of  pollutants,  and  may  ultimately  cause  the  degradation  of  the 
ecosystems.  Therefore,  ecological  investigations  and 
monitoring  of  the  background  regions  of  the  ocean,  especially 
in  such  highly  bioproductive  zones  as  the  Bering  Sea,  are  of 
g  reat  importance.  In  order  to  assess  the  ecological  consequences 
of  the  pollution  and  isolate  anthropogenic  effects  from  the 
background  of  natural  variability,  it  is  necessary  to  make  long- 
term  observations  of  fundamental  physical,  chemical  and 
biological  processes  in  selected  areas  of  the  above  regions. 
These  regions  differ  in  their  geographical  location,  as  well  as 
in  the  subsystems  of  their  ecosystems,  and  are  subjected  to 
different  anthropogenic  impacts. 

2.  Study  of  the  Processes  Determining  the  Assimilative 
Capacity  for  Contaminants  in  Marine  Ecosystems 

In  the  marine  environment,  various  physical,  chemical, 
and  biological  processes  occur  through  which  contaminants 
can  be  eliminated  from  the  ecosystem  without  serious 
disturbances  of  the  biogeochemical  cycles  of  the  elements  or 
changes  in  the  biota.  Diverse  oceanological  investigations 
carried  out  in  the  last  few  years  have  shown  that  the  biotic 
component  is  important  in  the  fluxes  of  pollutants. 

The  ability  of  an  ecosystem  to  protect  itself  against  a 
foreign  interference  at  the  expense  of  many  biological,  physical, 
and  chemical  processes  is  its  natural  ■■immunity"'  and  the 
measure  of  this  immunity  is  its  assimilative  capacity. 

According  to  the  contemporary  interpretation  (Izrael  & 
Tsyban.  1983b,  1989;  Izrael  et  a/.,  1988b.c),  the  assimilative 
capacity  of  a  marine  ecosystem  is  an  integral  function  of  its 
ex  ist  ing  environmental  status  that  reflects  the  ability  of  physical, 
chemical,  and  biological  processes  forelimination  of  pollutants 
and  their  impacts  on  the  biota. 

When  using  the  concept  of  assimilative  capacity  in  practice, 
it  is  necessary  to  bear  in  mind  that  a  marine  ecosystem  occupies 
a  finite  volume  that  may  be  isolated  on  the  basis  of  the  spatial 
distribution  of  organisms  of  various  trophic  levels,  groups  of 
ecologically  similar  species,  and  production/destruction 
processes,  as  well  as  physical  and  chemical  characteristics. 
Hence,  the  assimilative  capacity  of  each  specific  ecosystem 
also  has  a  value  that  objectively  characterizes  existing  properties 
of  the  marine  em  ironment.  This  value  could  be  determined  in 
practice  on  the  basis  of  integrated  investigations  and  monitoring 
of  the  marine  environment,  carried  out  in  accordance  with 
existing  methodological  recommendations  (Izrael  &  Tsyban. 
1983b,  1985,  1987,  1989;  Izrael  etal.,  1988b). 

The  use  of  this  concept  in  the  BERPAC  studies  will 
include  investigations  of  the  following  basic  problems: 
/.  quantitative  assessment  ol  the  balance  of  chemical  elements 
in  the  ecosystem  and  possible  changes  in  residence  times  due 
to  disturbances:  2.  assessment  of  adverse  biological  effects  at 


the  level  of  population  and  communities:  and.v  determination 
ol  the  critical  concentrations  at  whichcontaminants  adversely 
impact  the  marine  organisms  and  communities. 

Thus,  a  conceptual  model  of  the  assimilative  capacity, 
based  on  a  better  understanding  of  the  laws  of  marine  ecosy  stem 
functions,  can  serve  as  a  theoretical  basis  for  the  dev  elopment 
of  forecasts  of  both  the  immediate  and  long-range 
consequences  of  anthropogenic  and  climatic  impacts  on  the 
ocean  ecosystems. 

3.  Study  of  the  Elements  of  the  Biogeochemical  Carbon  Cycle 
and  Its  Role  in  Global  Climatic  Processes 

Global  warming  predicted  in  connection  with  the 
developing  greenhouse  effect  depends  directly  upon  the 
biogeochemical  cycle  of  carbon — the  most  important  process 
forming  the  Earth's  climate.  The  basic  elements  of  this  cycle 
are  carbon-dioxide  and  other  "greenhouse  gases"  exchanged 
within  the  ocean-atmosphere  system,  the  function  of  the 
carbonate  system,  and  the  turnover  of  organic  forms  of  carbon 
in  the  ocean. 

The  most  intensive  uptake  of  atmospheric  CO,  occurs  at 
high  latitudes,  as  a  result  of  favorable  thermal  and  hydrological 
conditions  (low  sea  surface  temperature  and  permanent 
downwelling)  in  the  region.  These  peculiarities  explain  the 
important  role  of  the  Bering  Sea,  a  subarctic  body  of  water 
having  a  large  area,  in  the  global  cycle  of  carbon  dioxide. 

The  relationship  between  the  rates  and  directions  of  CO, 
flow  within  the  ocean-atmosphere  system  directly  affects  the 
functioning  of  the  carbonate  system.  So.  in  the  conditions 
where  global  warming  is  induced  by  an  increase  in  the 
concentration  of  atmospheric  CO:.  a  shift  of  the  equilibrium 
between  carbonate  forms  of  carbon  in  seawater  might  occur, 
which  will  be  accompanied  by  a  decrease  of  pH  and. 
consequently,  elevation  of  the  lysocline. 

Investigations  of  these  processes,  directly  affecting  the 
sedimentation  of  organic  carbon  and  the  vital  functions  of 
marine  organisms,  are  only  possible  with  direct  determination 
of  all  components  of  the  carbonate  system  (i.e..  HCO„  CO,, 
H:CO,.  andCO,). 

To  fully  understand  all  of  the  characteristics  of  the  oceanic 
portion  of  the  global  carbon  cycle,  it  is  necessary  to  stud)  the 
processes  of  the  circulation  of  its  organic  forms  in  the 
composition  of  dissolved  and  particulate  matter  and  in  the  cells 
of  living  organisms  (Zaitsev.  1970.  1980,  1985). 

The  dynamic  equilibrium  of  dissolved  and  particulate 
organic  matter,  living  matter,  and  the  content  of  organic  carbon 
within  water  masses  depends  on  the  relations  between 
production/destruction  processes  established  in  the  ecosystem. 
In  this  connection,  the  predicted  effects  of  global  warming  on 
the  bioproductivity  of  the  Bering  Sea  ecosystem  will  influence 
the  organic  carbon  cycle.  In  order  to  studv  possible  changes, 
long-term  observations  of  the  concentrations  of  all  organic 
forms  of  carbon  are  necessary. 

Thus,  to  establish  the  carbon  balance  in  the  Bering  Sea 
ecosystem,  comprehensive  long-term  observations  of  all  carbon 
constituents  in  the  aquatic  interface  and  the  study  of  quantitative 
and  qualitative  composition  of  both  the  carbonate  system  and 
organic  forms  of  carbon  are  required. 


IV 


4.  In\  estimation ot'the  Physical  Mechanisms  Related  toClimate 
Variations 

Existing  global  physical  models  ot'the  ocean-atmosphere 
system  do  not  make  it  possible  to  predict  possible  climate 
changes  on  a  regional  scale  because  of  the  extreme  complexity 
of  the  modeled  systems.  Additional  investigations  of  the 
physical  development  of  regional  models,  in  particular  of  a 
model  for  the  Bering  Sea.  are  an  important  need  for  long-term 
climate  forecasting  at  the  present  time. 

This  problem  could  be  solved  on  the  basis  of  long-term 
oceanological  observations  in  different  regions  of  the  Bering 
Sea.  which  are  aimed  at  the  acquisition  of  systematic  information 
on  the  vertical  distribution  of  temperature,  heat  content  of  the 
active  layer  and  its  variability  with  time,  the  structure  and 
variability  of  ocean  circulation,  heat  transfer  by  the  basic  sea 
currents,  and  heat  and  moisture  fluxes  across  the  sea  surface. 

To  develop  the  above  models  it  is  necessary  to  know  the 
regularity  of  water  mass  formation  in  the  deep  basins  of  the 
Bering  Sea.  The  following  issues  are  not  yet  clear:  North 
Pacific  water  must  be  involved  in  bottom  water  formation,  but 
given  the  topographic  isolation  of  Bowers  and  the  central 
basins,  how  and  where  docs  this  lake  place?  Are  sources  the 
same  for  the  different  basins'  What  are  the  flushing  rates  (e.g.. 
residence  times)? 

There  are  three  hypothetical  mechanisms  by  which  bottom 
water  might  possibly  be  formed:  /.  modification  of  surface 
(upper  layer)  water  within  the  confines  of  the  sea  by  cooling 
and  brine  enhancement  through  ice  formation,  creating  water 
sufficiently  dense  to  sink  to  the  bottom:  2.  subsurface  mixings 
of  North  Pacific  water  with  appropriate  Bering  Sea  waters  as  it 
crosses  the  sills  in  the  Aleutian-Komandorskiy  Island  arc 
passages;  and  3.  direct  advection  of  deep  North  Pacific  water 
in  through  Kamchatka  Strait  and  then  sequentially  through  the 
gaps  into  the  other  basins. 

The  BERPAC  Program  will  investigate  the  mechanism  of 
deep  water  formation,  renewal  rates,  and  Hushing  of  the  basins. 

Area  of  Investigations 

While  selecting  the  study  areas  and  location  of  stations  in 
the  Bering  Sea.  the  diversity  and  contrast  of  ecological  conditions 
in  different  regions  of  the  sea  were  taken  into  account. 

In  order  to  reflect  a  variety  of  ecological  conditions  in  the 
Bering  Sea  more  completely,  it  seems  appropriate  that  integrated 
expeditions  include  work  on  polygons  located  in  different 
areas  of  the  sea  (with  the  purpose  of  obtaining  representative 
data  on  the  structure  and  functions  of  the  basic  marine 
ecosystems)  and  work  across  transects  (with  the  purpose  of 
determining  the  space  and  time  variations  of  the  key  ecological 
parameters). 

Investigations  within  the  framework  of  BERPAC  will  be 
conducted  on  four  polygons  where  investigations  were  carried 
out  in  1 98 1  (during  the  integrated  ecological  expedition  aboard 
the  research  vessel  ( R/V )  Akademik  Shirshov)  and  in  1 984  and 


1988  (during  the  second  and  third  Soviet-American  ecological 
expeditions  aboard  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev)  (Izrael  & 
Tsyban.  1987,  1990;  Izrael  etcd..  1988a;  Roscigno.  1990). 

Deep  stations  will  be  repeated  at  four  centered  polygons  in 
the  four  deep  basins.  The  center  station  of  each  polygon  will 
also  be  a  location  for  a  mooring  containing  sediment  traps  and 
current  meters,  funding  permitting.  Four  other  mooring 
locations  will  cover  the  entrance  from  the  North  Pacific  (in  the 
deep  channel  northwest  of  Komandorskiy  Island),  the  main 
gaps  in  the  ridges  north  of  Attu,  and  a  location  on  the  east  side 
of  the  Central  Basin  under  the  Bering  Slope  Current.  The 
mooring  locations  are  also  deep  oceanographic  stations,  and 
1  1  additional  stations  will  provide  continuity  among  the  deep 
waters. 

In  addition  to  polygons,  observations  are  planned  at  stations 
along  the  transects  located  in  areas  that  are  not  yet  completely 
understood,  such  as  the  Gulf  of  Anadyr,  the  Chirikov  Basin,  the 
Gulf  of  Alaska,  the  northern  portion  of  the  Pacific  Ocean,  and 
the  deep-water  central  and  southwestern  areas  of  the  sea. 
Larger  scale  studies  in  the  Chukchi  Sea  and  central  Pacific 
ecosystems  are  also  planned.  The  program  for  individual 
expeditions  will  be  discussed  specifically  during  joint  symposia. 

Proposed  Observations 

Complex  observations  during  the  ecological  expeditions 
include  meteorological  (including  aerological  and  geophysical 
studies),  oceanographical.  and  ecological  observations. 
Specifically,  the  following  observations  will  be  made: 

A.  Meteorological  observations  will  include  routine 
observations  of  meteorological  parameters,  such  as  studies  of 
direct  solar  radiation  intensity  and  ultraviolet  irradiation,  cloud 
and  cloud  type  studies,  and  collection  of  samples  of  atmospheric 
precipitation  for  chemical  analyses.  Aerological  and 
geophysical  observations  will  include  temperature  and  wind 
sounding  with  the  aid  of  radiosondes.  Air  samples  will  be 
collected  lor  determination  of  sulfates  and  nitrogen  oxides. 
Visual  observations  of  oil  and  oil  product  contamination  on  the 
sea  surface  will  be  recorded. 

B.  Oceanographic  observations  at  designated  sampling 
depths  in  the  water  column  will  include  temperature,  salinity, 
nutrients,  oxygen  content,  water  color  and  transparency, 
biogenic  elements,  alkalinity,  and  petroleum  hydrocarbons. 
Tracers  for  water  mass  types  will  include  stable  isotope  content 
of  seawater  (oxygen,  deuterium,  tritium,  freons,  silica,  and 
carbon  14).  In  addition,  current  velocity  and  direction  will  be 
determined,  and  sediment  trap  collections  will  be  made. 

C.  Ecological  observations  will  include  studies  of  the 
atmosphere,  sea  surface  microlayer,  water  column,  and  bottom 
deposits  in  the  environment. 

/.      Atmosphere 

In  rainfall.  pH  and  the  content  of  organic  contaminants 
will  be  determined.  In  dust  particles,  the  content  of  organic 
contaminants  and  metals  will  be  determined.  In  the  air  at  the 


sea  surface,  the  content  of  "greenhouse"  gases  (C02,  nitrogen 
oxides),  oxygen,  and  chlorinated  hydrocarbons  will  be 
determined. 

2.     Sea  surface  microlayer.  water  column,  and  bottom 
deposits 

Water  samples  will  be  collected  in  the  surface  microlayer 
and  at  standard  hydrological  depths  and  at  selected  experimental 
depths  (e.g.,  thermocline,  pycnoline,  phyto-  and  zooplankton 
maxima  and  sediment-water  interface)  (Zaitsev,  1980). 

a.  In  the  surface  microlayer,  the  following  elements  and 
parameters  will  be  determined: 

—  organic  carbon; 

-  contaminants  (toxic  metals,  and  aliphatic  aromatic 
and  chlorinated  hydrocarbons),  the  state  of  neustonic 
communities;  determination  of  the  structural 
characteristics  of  bacterioplankton;  total  numbers, 
biomass  of  microorganisms,  most  probable  numbers 
(MPN)  of  indicator  groups  of  bacteria  (e.g.,  paraffin- 
oxidizers,  PCB-transforming  and  neurotrophic 
saprophyte  groups),  and  indices  of  phyto-  and 
zooneuston  (numbers,  biomass,  species,  size 
composition,  species  mass  and  indicator  forms), 
mutation  (teratogenesis)  of  zooneuston  organisms. 

b.  In  the  water  column,  the  following  parameters  will  be 
determined: 

—  water  optical  indices; 

—  contaminants  (toxic  metals,  and  aromatic,  aliphatic 
and  chlorinated  hydrocarbons); 

•  the  total  concentrations  of  organic  carbon  and  its 
composition; 

—  elements  of  the  carbonate  system  (CO,,  HCO„  CO:); 

—  characteristics  of  bacterioplankton  (total  numbers, 
biomass,  MPN,  and  distribution  of  indicator  groups); 
and  their  biochemical  and  genetic  capacities; 
structural  characteristics  of  phyto-,  microzoo-,  and 
mesozooplankton  ( numbers,  biomass,  size,  and  species 
composition,  species  mass,  and  indicator  forms); 
functional  characteristics  of  planktonic  communities 
(heterotrophic  CO,  assimilation  by  bacteria,  bacterial 
production,  phytoplankton  productivity);  and 
biosedimentation  rate  of  particulate  matter. 

c.  In  the  biota,  the  following  parameters  will   be 
determined: 

contaminants  (toxic  metals,  and  aromatic,  chlorinated 
and  aliphatic  hydrocarbons;  and 
organic  carbon  content,  stable  carbon,  and  nitrogen 
isotope  content. 

d.  In  bottom  sediments,  the  following  elements  will  be 
determined: 

determinants  (toxic  metals,  and  aromatic,  chlorinated 
and  aliphatic  hydrocarbons). 
total  organic  carbon  and  nitrogen; 
stable  carbon  and  nitrogen  isotopes;  and 


—  structural  characteristics  of  zoobenthos  (numbers, 
biomass,  species  composition,  and  species  mass). 

3.  Higher  trophic  levels 

During  the  expedition,  zoological  observations  will  be 
carried  out:  numbers,  distribution,  and  migrator)'  patterns  of 
fish,  birds,  and  marine  mammals. 

4.  Model  experiments 

Model  experiments  will  be  performed  under  conditions 
similar  to  natural  situations.  During  these  experiments,  the 
following  parameters  will  be  studied: 

—  photochemical  oxidation  of  organic  contaminants; 

—  biodegradation  potential  of  bacterioplankton  with 
respect  to  organic  contaminants  (benzo(a)pyrene. 
PCB,  etc.); 

—  combined  influence  of  contaminants  on  biological 
"targets"  and  establishment  of  "critical"  concentrations 
of  the  impact  on  plankton  communities  in  the 
conditions  of  controlled  ecosystems  (Izrael  el  a!.. 
1988a);  and 

—  sediment  respiration  and  nutrient  flux  experiments. 

Connection  with  Other  International  Programs 

The  BERPAC  Program  has  much  in  common  with  other 
international  programs,  but  at  the  same  time  it  has  its  own 
particular  features  mentioned  earlier.  Wide  cooperation  with 
other  similar  international  projects  is  built  within  the  framework 
of  this  program — in  particular,  in  the  preparation  of  joint 
marine  expeditions.  Wide  data  exchange  is  also  planned. 

Schedule  of  Activities  and  Applications  of  Results 

Since  1977,  successful  joint  investigations  of  Soviet  and 
American  scientists  have  been  carried  out  in  the  Bering  Sea 
within  the  framework  of  the  specific  theme  of  the  bilateral 
cooperation  "Bering  Sea"  (Project  "Comprehensive 
Environmental  Analysis;"  Subproject  "Comprehensive 
Analysis  of  Marine  Ecosystem  State  and  Ecological  Problems 
of  the  World  Ocean").  Important  stages  of  this  cooperation 
were  three  joint  ecological  Soviet-American  expeditions  in  the 
Bering  Sea  on  the  R/V  Volna  (Summer  1977).  R/V  Akademik 
Korolev  ( Summer  1 984  and  1 988 ).  and  several  symposia  on  the 
preparation  of  scientific  programs  and  analyses  of  the  results  of 
these  expeditions,  as  well  as  three  monographs  describing  the 
results  of  long-term  Soviet-American  investigations  in  the 
Bering  Sea  (Izrael  &  Tsyban,  1990;  Roscigno.  1990).  H  is 
expected  that  these  expeditions  will  be  every  four  years  and 
followed  by  international  symposia  and  joint  publications. 

Monographs  on  the  results  of  future  expeditions  will  be 
published.  It  is  expected  that  seminars  and  symposia  within  the 
framework  of  the  BERPAC  Program  will  be  conducted.  Also 
included  in  the  plans  are  special  intercalibrations,  a  wide 
exchange  of  specialists,  and  joint  experimental  work. 


VI 


References 


Coachman,  L.  K.  (1990).  Bering  Sea  ecosystem:  basic 
characteristics  and  prospects  for  long-term  research.  In 
Research  on  the  Bering  Sea  Ecosystem.  Results  of  the 
Second  Soviet-American  Expedition.  The  37th  Cruise  of 
the  Research  Vessel  Akademik  Korolev.  June-September 
1984. Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers, Leningrad. 2.  (in Russian) 

Izrael,  Yu.  A.  &  Tsyban,  A.  V.  (eds. )  (1983a).  Research  on  the 
Bering  Sea  Ecosystem.  Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers. 
Leningrad.  157  pp.  (in  Russian) 

Izrael.  Yu.  A.  &  Tsyban.  A.  V.  (1983b).  On  the  assimilative 
capacity  of  the  World  Ocean.  Reports  of  the  USSR  Academy 
of  Sciences  272(3),  702-705.  (in  Russian) 

Izrael.  Yu.  A.  &  Tsyban.  A.  V.  (1985).  The  ecology  and 
problems  of  global  ocean  monitoring.  In  Comprehensive 
Global  Ocean  Monitoring  1.  19-48.  Gidrometeoizdat 
Publishers,  Leningrad,  (in  Russian) 

Izrael,  Yu.  A.  &  Tsyban,  A.  V.  (eds.)  ( 1987).  Comprehensive 
Analysis  of  the  Bering  Sea  Ecosystem.  Gidrometeoizdat 
Publishers,  Leningrad,  264  pp.  (in  Russian) 

Izrael,  Yu.  A.  &  Tsyban,  A.  V.  (1989).  Anthropogenic  Ecology 
of  the  Ocean.  Gidrometeoizdat.  Leningrad.  528  pp.  (in 
Russian) 

Izrael,  Yu.  A.  &  Tsyban,  A.  V.  (eds.)  (1990).  Research  on  the 
Bering  Sea  Ecosystem.  In  Results  of  the  Soviet-American 
Expedition.  The  37th  Cruise  of  the  Research  Vessel  Akademik 
Korolev.  June-September.  1984.  Gidrometeoizdat 
Publishers.  Leningrad,  344  pp.  (in  Russian) 


Izrael,  Yu.  A.,  Tsyban.  A.  V.,  Panov,  G.  V.,  Korsak,  M.  N. 
et  al.  ( 1988a).  Comprehensive  analysis  of  the  Bering  Sea 
ecosystem.  In  Comprehensive  Analysis  of  the  Environment. 
Proceedings  from  the  Fifth  USSR-US  Symposium. 
Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers.  Leningrad,  528  pp.  (in  Russian) 

Izrael,  Yu.  A..  Tsyban,  A.  V.,  Ventzel,  M.  V.  &  Shigaev,  V.  V. 
( 1988b).  Generalized  model  of  the  assimilative  capacity  of 
a  marine  ecosystem.  Reports  of  the  USSR  Academy  of 
Sciences  380(2).  (in  Russian) 

Izrael.  Yu.  A..  Tsyban,  A.  V.,  Ventzel,  M.  V.  &  Shigaev.  V.  V. 
(1988c).  Scientific  basis  for  ecological  standardization  of 
the  anthropogenic  impact  on  marine  ecosystems  (using  the 
example  of  the  Baltic  Sea  ecosystem.  Oceanology  28(2). 
(in  Russian) 

Roscigno,  P.  F.  (ed.  )  (1990).  Results  of  the  Second  Joint  US- 
USSR  Bering  Sea  Expedition.  Summer  1984.  US  Fish  and 
Wildlife  Service  Biological  Report  90(  13).  347  pp. 

Zaitsev.  Yu.  P.  (1970).  Marine  Neustonology.  Naukova 
Dumka  Publishers.  Kiev,  264  pp.  (in  Russian) 

Zaitsev,  Yu.  P.  ( 1980).  Zooneuston  and  methods  for  its  study. 
In  Methods  for  Biological  Analysis  of  Sea  Water  and  Bottom 
Sediments,  pp.  134-139.  Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers, 
Leningrad,,  (in  Russian) 

Zaitsev,  Yu.  P.  ( 1985).  Biotic  contours  in  ocean  monitoring.  In 
Comprehensive  Global  Ocean  Monitoring.  Proceedings 
from  the  First  International  Symposium  2,  76-83. 
Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers.  Leningrad,  (in  Russian  I 


John  F.  Turner 
Director.  US  Fish  and 

Wildlife  Service 
Washington,  DC 


Yuriy  A.  Izrael 
Chairman.  USSR  State 
Committee  for  Hydrometeorology 
Moscow,  USSR 


Harold  J.  O'Connor 

Project  Leader.  USA 

US  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 

Patuxent  Wildlife  Research  Center 

Laurel,  Maryland 


Alia  V.  Tsyban 

Project  Leader,  USSR 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology  & 

State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology 
Academy  of  Sciences 
Moscow,  USSR 


Protocol  of  the  First  Joint  US-USSR 

Central  Pacific  Ocean  Expedition 

on  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev 


In  accordance  with  the  memorandum  of  the  1 1th  meeting 
of  the  US-USSR  Joint  Committee  on  the  Environment 
Protection  (Moscow,  USSR,  February  1988)  and  the 
recommendation  of  the  "Soviet-American  Conference  on  the 
Ecology  of  the  Bering  Sea"  (Batumi,  USSR.  March  1988)  and 
the  plan  of  the  joint  bilateral  activity  of  02.07-2101. 
"Comprehensive  Analysis  of  Marine  Ecosystems  and  Ecological 
Problems  of  the  World  Ocean."  the  Third  Joint  US-USSR 
Bering  &  Chukchi  Seas  Expedition  was  held  on  26  July  1988 
on  board  the  Soviet  research  vessel  Akademik  Korolev.  The 
second  leg  of  this  expedition  was  conducted  from  9  September 
to  3 1  October  in  the  central  Pacific  Ocean  and  South  China  Sea. 
The  delegation  was  headed  by  Prof.  Alia  V.  Tsyban  and 
Dr.  Gregory  J.  Smith.  Nearly  10,000  nautical  miles  of  ocean 
were  covered  during  this  leg  of  the  expedition. 

The  Soviet  delegates  were  represented  by  participants  in 
the  cruise  from  the  USSR  State  Committee  for 
Hydrometeorology  and  Control  of  Natural  Environment;  the 
Academy  of  Sciences  from  the  USSR;  and  the  Academies  of 
Sciences  from  Ukraine,  Belyorussia,  and  Estonia.  A  list  of 
participants  is  given  as  Appendix  A. 

Six  American  delegates  joined  the  expedition  during  the 
port  of  call  in  Hilo,  Hawaii,  on  9  September  1988  and  were 
represented  by  participants  from  the  US  Fish  and  Wildlife 
Service  (Department  of  the  Interior),  and  the  University  of 
Washington.  A  list  of  participants  is  given  as  Appendix  A. 

The  principal  objective  of  the  second  leg  of  the  Third  Joint 
US-USSR  Expedition  was  to  conduct  comprehensive  studies 
of  the  ecology  of  the  central  Pacific  Ocean  with  an  emphasis  on 
ecosystem  processes  and  the  effects  of  anthropogenic  pollutants 
on  those  systems.  Included  in  this  research  was  a  complete 
zoological,  chemical,  and  microbiological  assessment  of  an 
isolated  tropical  coral  atoll.  Caroline  Atoll,  Kiribati. 
Hydrological  stations  were  included  along  the  route  from 
Hawaii  to  Christinas  Island,  where  a  port  of  call  was  made  to 
bring  aboard  a  wildlife  biologist  from  the  government  of 
Kiribati  for  studies  of  Caroline  Atoll.  During  the  period  of 
22-29  September,  extensive  studies  of  this  remote  atoll's 
ecology  were  conducted  and  an  assessment  of  the  atoll's  status 
with  respect  to  environmental  contamination  was  made.  A 
complete  survey  of  the  atoll's  plant  and  bird  communities  was 
also  done.  A  full  ecological  station  was  sampled  offshore  from 
the  atoll  and  series  of  four  more  stations  were  included  enroute 
to  Ratawa  where  the  Kiribati  representative  disembarked. 
After  Tarawa,  the  research  vessel  proceeded  to  I  IN  latitude. 
Along  (he  1  I  transect,  six  ecological  stations  were  studied 
in  the  Marianas  section.  The  first  station  was  m  more  than 
6.00(1  meters  of  water,  the  last  station  along  this  transect  was 
near  the  eastern   Philippines,  and  the  Akademik  Korolev 


proceeded  through  the  Straits  of  Mindanao  into  the  Mindanao. 
Sulu.  and  South  China  Seas.  This  route  avoided  Typhoon 
Ruby,  which  was  located  in  the  north  Philippines  and  caused  a 
severe  loss  of  life  and  property  in  that  area.  On  25  October 
1 988,  a  three-day  anchor  station  began  in  the  South  China  Sea 
at  6°N  latitude,  three  miles  west  of  the  107th  parallel.  This 
long-term  ecological  station  was  the  first  in  a  series  of  five  as 
the  expedition  proceeded  into  Singapore.  Arrival  at  Singapore 
was  on  31  October  1988,  completing  the  second  leg  of  the  joint 
American-Soviet  expedition  of  1988.  The  route  of  the 
expedition  is  shown  in  the  Frontispiece. 

The  main  scientific  tasks: 

/.  Biological,  chemical,  and  physical  fundamental  data 
were  collected  to  provide  a  comprehensive  ecological  and 
oceanographic  profile  of  the  central  Pacific  Ocean  and  South 
China  Sea.  These  data  provided  a  basis  for  comparison  with  the 
Bering  and  Chukchi  Seas. 

2.  Cooperative  studies  of  the  methodology  of  collection, 
quantification,  and  chemical  analysis  of  plastic  debris  were 
conducted  to  assess  the  overall  hazard  of  plastics  to  marine  life. 

3.  The  ecological  health  of  a  remote  coral  atoll  in  the 
central  Pacific  was  determined.  Complete  studies  of  the  bird 
and  plant  communities  were  done.  Studies  of  chlorinated 
hydrocarbons,  their  concentrations,  distribution,  and 
degradation  by  photolytic  and  microbiological  processes  were 
determined,  thereby  providing  an  assessment  of  the  effects  of 
anthropogenic  activities. 

In  accordance  with  specialties  of  the  expedition's 
participants,  working  groups  were  organized.  At  these  meetings, 
work  schedules,  joint  studies,  and  model  experiments  were 
planned.  During  the  expedition,  meetings  of  the  Scientific 
Council  Board  were  also  held.  Discussed  at  these  meetings 
were  the  important  scientific  findings  of  the  expedition, 
comparing  the  Pacific  Ocean  and  the  Bering  and  Chukchi  Seas. 
Also  discussed  were  new  areas  of  investigation  that  were 
introduced  into  the  research  effort  with  the  new  delegation  of 
American  scientists  on  the  second  leg.  These  areas 
included  studies  of  marine  plastic  pollution,  bird  ecology,  and 
the  collection  of  biota  for  radionuclide  analysis. 
Cooperative  studies  of  the  degradation  and  photolytic  products 
of  benzo(a)pyrene  were  expanding  during  this  leg  of  the 
expedition. 

Complex  ecological  studies  were  undertaken  for  the  first 
time  in  the  equatorial  part  of  the  Pacific  Ocean.  Unique  joint 
studies  thai  w  ere  undertaken  to  study  the  ecosystem  Of  Caroline 
Atoll,  an  extremely  remote  area  removed  from  the  main  sources 
of  anthropogenic  influences,  are  especially  interesting.  During 
the  course  of  the  cruise,  results  of  preliminary  investigations 
were  obtained. 


VIII 


The  concentration  of  dissolved  oxygen  in  the  lagoon 
waters  of  Caroline  Atoll  reached  1 15  to  126%,  and  the  vertical 
distribution  of  hydrochemical  parameters  were  relatively 
homogeneous.  Salinity  in  lagoon  waters  was  slightly  higher 
than  in  water  sampled  outside  of  the  lagoon  (ocean  water);  the 
average  values  for  lagoon  and  adjacent  ocean  water  were 
36.05  and  35.85  parts  per  thousand,  respectively.  Nutrient 
concentrations  were  lower  in  lagoon  water  than  in  coastal 
water:  silicon  and  phosphorus  were  two  times  lower,  nitrates 
were  one  and  one-half  times  lower.  According  to  studies  of 
hydrooptical  characteristics  the  lagoon  waters  do  not  differ 
significantly  from  the  ocean  waters. 

The  mean  rate  of  biosedimentation  of  particulate  organic 
matter  (POM)  in  the  water  column  from  0  to  100  m  in  the  area 
investigated  in  the  tropical  zone  of  the  Pacific  Ocean  was  found 
to  be  14.2  to  72.5  mg  of  dry  matter/m'/day.  In  coastal  waters 
of  the  atoll  this  rate  was  64.5  mg  dry  matter/mVday.  The  rate 
of  biosedimentation  in  the  surface  water  was  two  times  higher 
than  the  rate  at  a  depth  of  100  m. 

The  most  probable  number  (MPN)  of  heterotrophic 
saprophytic  bacteria  in  the  water  inside  and  outside  of  the 
Caroline  Atoll  lagoon  was  1,000  to  10,000  cells/ml.  The  MPN 
ofparaffin-oxidizing,benzo(a)pyrene-transforming,andPCB- 
transforming  bacteria  in  the  water  near  the  atoll  was  10  to 
1,000  cells/ml.  In  the  water  inside  of  the  lagoon  the  MPN  of 
microorganisms  of  these  groups  was  less:  3  to  10  cells/ml.  This 
information  gives  us  the  ability  to  characterize  the  atoll's  water 
as  clean,  without  anthropogenic  pollutants. 

The  dominant  pollutant  in  the  atoll's  ecosystem,  in  the 
widely  investigated  range  of  chlorinated  hydrocarbons,  was 
DDT  and  its  metabolites  (approaching  1  ng/1).  Other  substances 
observed  in  the  pollutant  benzo(a)pyrene  were  more  intensive 
at  Caroline  Atoll  than  in  the  tropical  zone  of  the  ocean.  In  one 
hour,  the  amount  of  benzo(a)pyrene  destroyed  approached 
85%,  and  after  three  hours  more  than  95%  of  experimentally 
added  benzo(a)pyrene  was  destroyed.  Ecotoxicity  experiments 
conducted  in  situ  dealing  with  the  influence  of  benzo(a)pyrene, 
PCB's,  copper,  and  cadmium  on  planktonic  communities  of 
the  atoll's  waters  showed  higher  vulnerability  of  planktonic 
organisms  to  toxic  metals  and  were  relatively  more  resistant  to 
benzo(a)pyrene  and  PCB's  in  comparison  with  the  northern 
seas. 

The  distinctive  feature  of  the  zooneuston  of  the  Caroline 
lagoon  in  comparison  with  the  adjoining  oceanic  waters  is  the 
presence  of  a  neuritic  complex  of  organisms  (larval  stages  of 
benthic  animals  and  the  early  stages  of  Copepoda).  The  mean 
number  of  organisms  was  64  ind/m\  26  less  than  in  the  coastal 
waters  of  the  atoll.  Nevertheless,  the  zooneuston  of  the  lagoon 
play  an  important  role  in  the  formation  of  the  coastal  water 
fauna. 

A  unique  Acropora-Tridacna  reef,  dividing  the  lagoon, 
was  discovered  in  the  southern  part  of  the  atoll.  Its  length  was 
more  than  one  kilometer  and  its  width  was  15  to  20  m.  At 
certain  places  along  the  reef,  the  Tridacna  formed  a  dense 
aggregation  with  numbers  approaching  40  ind/m:. 

More  than  42,000  m2  of  Pacific  Ocean  surface  water  were 
sampled  for  plastic  debris  and  macroscopic  spherules.  Plastics 
were  recovered  at  six  of  the  29  different  stations  sampled. 


At  two  of  these  stations,  tar  balls  were  also  recovered.  The 
density  of  surface  plastics  in  areas  that  had  positive  samples 
ranged  from  0.00782  to  0.19481  mg  plastic/nr.  Because 
marine  growth  on  the  surface  of  plastics  may  alter  the  specific 
gravity  of  floating  debris,  sampling  was  also  done  at  the 
thermocline  to  determine  if  plastic  could  be  contaminating  this 
important  subsurface  stratum.  None  of  the  5 1 ,600  m3  of  water 
sampled  at  the  thermocline  at  nine  different  stations  contained 
any  plastics  or  anthropogenic  materials.  The  surface  water  of 
the  Caroline  Atoll  lagoon  was  sampled  at  two  locations  using 
a  102  neuston  net.  More  than  21,500  nr  of  water  sampled 
showed  no  evidence  of  plastics  or  other  debris.  Extensive 
sampling  of  surface  and  subsurface  water  was  also  done  in  the 
South  China  Sea.  Although  a  wide  variety  of  anthropogenic 
materials  were  recovered  in  surface  tows,  few  plastic  cylinders 
(raw  material)  were  found.  One  sample  from  the  thermocline 
contained  plastic  line,  the  most  common  form  of  plastic 
recovered  in  this  area.  Another  surface  sample  from  the  South 
China  Sea  contained  more  than  1 64  tar  balls  greater  than  4  mm 
in  diameter. 

Detailed  data  on  the  plants,  seabirds,  landbirds,  mammals, 
reptiles,  and  human  disturbance  were  obtained  from  39  islets  at 
Caroline  Atoll.  The  flora  consists  of  19  species  (one  new  to  the 
island)  organized  into  4  natural  and  4  anthropogenic  plant 
communities;  92%  of  the  islets  are  pristine.  Eleven  species  of 
seabirds  breed  (red-tailed  tropicbird  is  a  new  record):  the  sooty 
tern,  with  189,000  breeding  pairs,  was  the  most  abundant 
species.  The  long-tailed  cuckoo  was  recorded  for  the  first  time 
in  the  Line  Islands. 

At-sea  observations  of  marine  birds  indicated  high 
densities  near  uninhabited  islands  and  in  known  areas  of  high 
productivity.  Low  densities  were  observed  in  areas  of 
low  ocean  productivity  and  in  areas  with  high  human 
disturbance  (Gilbert  Islands,  and  the  Bohol,  Sulu,  and  South 
China  Seas). 

Beach  surveys  for  anthropogenic  debris  were  done  on  nine 
islands  of  Caroline  Atoll.  Plastic  and  styrofoam  objects 
accounted  for  75  to  80%  of  the  total  number  of  items  observed; 
however,  glass  bottles  and  fishing  gear  were  significantly  more 
important  with  respect  to  volume  and  biomass  of  debris. 
Observations  were  also  made  at  sea  to  determine  the  amount  of 
floating  debris. 

Samples  were  collected  at  Caroline  Atoll  and  selected 
ocean  sampling  stations  for  radiological  analyses.  These 
analyses  will  compare  natural  versus  anthropogenic 
radioisotopes.  Radioisotope  concentrations  at  Caroline  Atoll 
will  be  compared  to  similar  samples  obtained  in  the  Marshall 
Islands  that  contain  contamination  from  atmospheric  nuclear 
weapons  testing  30  years  ago. 

At  the  end  of  the  joint  expedition  on  board  the  Akademik 
Korolev,  there  was  an  exchange  of  preliminary  data.  Future 
exchanges  of  data  and  results  of  analyses  will  occur  in  a  series 
of  three  exchanges:  1.  1  March  1989;  2.  1  June  1989;  and 
3.  1  October  1989. 

Both  sides  note  with  satisfaction  the  friendly  and 
constructive  atmosphere  of  the  expedition's  work  and  the 
effectiveness  of  joint  observations  allowing  for  a  variety  of 
oceanographic  and  ecological  studies. 


The  American  delegation  w  ishes  to  extend  their  sincerest 
gratitude  to  the  Soviet  participants  of  the  expedition. 
The  science  staff  and  ship's  crew  provided  an  atmosphere 
conducive  not  only  to  research  but  also  the  main  friendships 
that  resulted  from  our  meeting.  The  American  delegation 
would  especially  like  to  thank  Professor  A.  V.  Tsyban  and 


Captain  O.  A.  Rostov tse\  for  the  wealth  of  scientific  and 
maritime  knowledge  provided  the  foundation  for  this  highly 
successful  scientific  endeavor. 

This  protocol  was  written  in  English  and  Russian  and  was 
signed  on  board  the  research  vessel  Akademik  Korolev, 
1  November  1988.   Both  texts  are  equally  authentic. 


For  the  American  side: 

Leader  of  the  American 
Scientific  Delegation. 
Patuxent  Wildlife  Research  Center. 
US  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service. 
US  Department  of  the  Interior 


For  the  Soviet  side: 
Head  of  Expedition, 

Leader  of  Project  for 

the  USSR  Side. 
Deputy  Director  ol  Laboratory  lor 

Environmental  and  Climate  Monitoring 

Laboratory . 
Goskomgidromet  and  Academv  of  Sciences 


Dr.  (1.  J.  Smith  Professor  A.  V.  Tsyban 

(This  text  is  a  reproduction  of  the  protocol  vv  ritten  on  board  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev  m  I  C)S8.  The  original  w  as  signed  bv  both  project  leader.* 


Acknowledgments 


We  gratefully  acknowledge  and  thank  the  many  individuals  without  whose  participation  this  monograph 
may  not  have  been  published  with  the  same  quality,  accuracy,  and  clarity. 

We  thank  the  US  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service  and  the  USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology 

for  their  continued  support. 

Steven  Kohl  and  Stephanie  Miller,  the  Coordinator  and  Associate  Coordinator  of  US-USSR  Programs, 
US  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service  (Office  of  International  Affairs),  have  provided  invaluable  assistance 
throughout  every  phase  of  this  project.  Their  enthusiasm  and  energy  given  to  this  project,  and  the  people 
involved  with  this  project,  are  outstanding. 

Without  each  participant  of  the  expedition,  and  each  author  of  research  results,  there  would  be  no  need 
for  a  monograph.  There  are  far  too  many  to  name  here;  however,  their  names  are  listed  with  each  subchapter 
and  in  Appendix  A  in  this  volume.  It  is  their  interest  and  excitement  for  the  research  presented  here,  and  their 
spirit  of  cooperation  so  necessary  for  an  international  project,  that  provide  the  essence  of  the  scientific 
accomplishments. 

We  are  indebted  to  each  of  the  US  and  USSR  chapter  editors  for  their  help  and  their  patience  with  the 
seemingly  endless  questions  and  tasks  assigned  to  them,  and  last  but  certainly  not  least,  for  their  sense  of 
humor  which  is  often  the  only  saving  grace  inputting  together  a  volume  of  this  magnitude.  Their  names  are 
listed  alphabetically  below: 

Sergei  M.  Chernyak  Gregory  J.  Smith 

Cameron  B.  Kepler  Alia  V.  Tsyban 

Mikhael  N.  Korsak  Terry  E.  Whitledge 

Clifford  P.  Rice 

The  "Production  Team"  at  Patuxent  Wildlife  Research  Center — Kinard  Boone,  Patricia  A.  Holt, 
Susan  A.  Liga,  Robert  E.  Munro,  Patricia  A.  Nagel,  and  John  C.  Sauer — deserves  recognition  for  their 
dedication  to  meeting  the  challenge  of  producing  a  quality  volume  in  time  for  it  to  be  distributed  to 
participants  on  the  1992  Expedition. 


Harold  J.  O'Connor  Alia  V.  Tsyban 


XI 


Table  of  Contents 


Page 

Foreword  iii 

Protocol  of  the  First  Joint  US-USSR  Central  Pacific  Ocean  Expedition  on  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev viii 

Acknowledgments xi 

Frontispiece  xiv 

Chapter  1 :  ECOLOGICAL  INVESTIGATION  OF  A  CORAL  ATOLL  IN  THE  CENTRAL  PACIFIC  ..  1 

Chapter  1  Frontispiece 3 

1.1  Ecological  Studies  of  Caroline  Atoll.  Republic  of  Kiribati.  South-central  Pacific  Ocean  : 

Part  1.  History,  Physiography,  Botany,  and  Islet  Descriptions 5 

Introduction 5 

Geography 6 

History  of  Caroline  Atoll 6 

Pre-European  History:  Tuamotuan  Period 6 

Post-European  History:    17th  to  19th  Centuries 6 

The  Late  19th  and  20th  Centuries 8 

Methods 9 

Naming  Caroline's  Motus 9 

Structure  and  Topography 10 

General  Account 10 

Reef  Flats 10 

Beaches 11 

Lagoon  12 

Substrata 13 

Hydrology 13 

Climate 14 

Vegetation:  Vascular  Plants  and  Floristics 15 

Botanical  History  15 

Vascular  Plants  of  Caroline  Atoll  15 

Floristics  and  Ecology  of  the  Motus 21 

Ecological  Succession 23 

Basic  Serai  Stages 23 

Ecological  Succession  on  Motus  of  Different  Size  Classes 23 

Species-Area  Relationships 25 

Plant  Communities 26 

General  Account  26 

Natural  Herb  Mat 26 

Beach  Scrub  with  Suriana 27 

Pandanus  Forest 27 

Tournefortia  Scrub  and  Forest 27 

Cordia  Forest 29 

Pisonia  Forest 29 

Coconut  Woodlands 32 

Absent  Plant  Communities 34 

Description  and  Ecology  of  the  Motus 34 

Nake  Island  35 

Long  Island 36 

Windward  Islets 37 

South  Nake  Islets  42 

Central  Leeward  Islets  44 

Southern  Leeward  Islets 47 

Conclusion 44 

fables  51 

Figures 63 


Plates   93 

Appendix  1  135 

Appendix  2 136 

1.2  Ecological  Studies  on  Caroline  Atoll,  Republic  of  Kiribati,  South-central  Pacific  Ocean: 

Part  2.  Seabirds,  Other  Terresterial  Anmials  and  Conservation 139 

Introduction 139 

History  of  Ornithological  Studies  139 

Methods 140 

Seabird  Species  Accounts 14! 

Other  Birds  on  Caroline  Atoll 147 

Other  Vertebrates 149 

Coconut  Crabs 150 

Conservation:   Attributes  of  International  Significance 151 

Tables 153 

Figures 157 

Plates  163 

1 .3  First  Records  of  the  Long-tailed  Cuckoo  (Eudynamis  taitensis)  on  Caroline  Atoll,  Southern 

Line  Islands,  Republic  of  Kiribati 165 

1.4  A  Study  of  the  Benthic  Communities  of  Caroline  Atoll  (Line  Islands,  Pacific  Ocean) 166 

Chapter  1  References 171 

Chapter  2:  INVESTIGATIONS  AND  ANTHROPOGENIC  ECOLOGY 177 

2. 1  Distribution  of  Chlorinated  Hydrocarbons  in  Ecosystems  of  the  Equatorial  Pacific 1 79 

2.2  Distribution  of  Polycyclic  Aromatic  Hydrocarbons 183 

2.3  The  Occurrence  and  Microbial  Transformation  of  Benzo(a)pyrene  in  the  Waters  of  the 

Tropical  Pacific  (Caroline  Atoll,  Line  Islands,  Phoenix  Islands  Transect.  South  China  Sea) 186 

2.4  Cesium-137  in  the  Surface  Waters  of  the  Central  Equatorial  Pacific 191 

2.5  Quantity  and  Distribution  of  Plastics:  An  Analysis  of  Chemical  Hazards  to  Marine  Life 193 

2.6  The  Role  of  Solar  Irradiation  in  the  Oxidative  Transformation  of  Benzo(a)pyrene 197 

Chapter  2  References 203 

Chapter  3:  BIOLOGICAL  INVESTIGATIONS  IN  THE  CENTRAL  PACIFIC 205 

3.1  A  Description  of  Bacterioplankton 207 

3.2  A  Study  of  Primary  Phytoplankton  Production 212 

3.3  Mesozooplankton  213 

3.4  Zooneuston  of  the  Tropical  Pacific 223 

3.5  Observations  of  Seabirds  along  a  14.892-km  Cruise  Track  in  the  Tropical  Pacific  Ocean  and 

the  Bohol,  Sulu,  and  South  China  Seas 225 

3.6  Evidence  for  a  Major  Fall  Land  Bird  Migration  Corridor  Across  the  South  China  Sea  from 
Indo-China  to  the  Greater  Sunda  Islands 247 

Chapter  3  References 253 

General  Conclusions  257 

Appendix  A  259 


o 

m  - 


o 

CD 


O 


o 

CD  ' 


O 


o 

CD  . 


o 

in . 


ca 
ca 

■x. 


-^-0^^ 


y. 

C 

O 

— 

'-> 

O 

_1 

t    , 

C 

'-) 

_- 

c 

(D 

ca 

KJ 

t/3 

f- 

_) 

C 

p 

® 

c 

) 

z 

< 

u 

o 

u 

u 
< 


C 


.c 
U 


ca 

ca 
ca 
H. 


© 


® 


\> 


0 


o 


® 


. 


^ 


<?' 


® 


/ 


■8 


O 
c/5 


3C 
30 


< 

0. 

04 

UJ 

aa 


■a 
u 
n. 
x 

UJ 


act 

D 

l 

t/3 

D 


o 
■a- 


o 

CD 


O 
CM 


O 
CM 


\l\ 


Chapter  1:  I 

ECOLOGICAL  INVESTIGATION 

OF  A  CORAL  ATOLL 

IN  THE  CENTRAL  PACIFIC 


Editor: 


CAMERON  B.  KEPLER 


CAROLINE  ATOLL 


1000 
I L 


2000 


METERS 


Chapter  1  Frontispiece.  Air-mosaic  of  Caroline 
Atoll,  RNZAF  6569.  Reproduced  by  permission  of 
the  Lands  and  Survey  Department,  New  Zealand. 


1.1     Ecological  Studies  of  Caroline  Atoll, 

Republic  of  Kiribati,  South-central  Pacific 
Ocean 

Part  1.  History,  Physiography,  Botany,  and  Islet  Descriptions 

ANGELA  K.  KEPLER  ,  CAMERON  B.  KEPLER1,  and  DAVID  H.  ELLIS* 

*t/5  Fish  &  Wildlife  Senice,  Patuxent  Wildlife  Researeh  Center,  Southeast  Research  Station,  Athens,  Georgia,  USA 
XUS  Fish  &  Wildlife  Senice,  Patuxent  Wildlife  Research  Center,  Laurel,  Maryland,  USA 


Introduction 

On  26  July  1988,  the  Soviet  research  vessel  Akademik 
Korolev  sailed  from  Vladivostok  enroute  to  Dutch  Harbor, 
Alaska.  There,  Soviet  oceanographers  joined  their  American 
colleagues  to  investigate  the  Gulf  of  Alaska  and  the  Chukchi 
Sea  in  the  Third  Joint  US-USSR  Eering  &  Chukchi  Seas 
Expedition.  When  the  arctic  research  was  completed  in  early 
September,  the  ship  headed  toward  the  central  Pacific.  A 
rendezvous  for  a  second  contingent  of  Americans  took  place  in 
Hilo,  Hawaii,  on  9  September.  Six  Americans  joined  the  ship, 
which  set  sail  on  a  cruise  track  of  14,892  km  that  terminated 

6  weeks  later  in  Singapore.  An  important  part  of  the  expedition 
was  research  in  and  around  little-known  Caroline  Atoll,  at  the 
southeastern  edge  of  the  Line  Group.  On  Christmas  Island,  we 
picked  up  Katino  Teeb'aki,  a  conservation  officer  for  the 
Republic  of  Kiribati,  who  represented  his  government  and 
helped  our  land-based  research  efforts.  After  landing  on 
Caroline  on  22  September,  we  camped  in  2  locations  for 

7  nights,  surveying  the  terrestrial  plants  and  animals  on  all 
39  islets.  Caroline  is  a  remarkably  pristine  atoll  with  its  native 
plant  communities  nearly  intact  on  all  but  three  islets,  and 
teeming  seabird  communities  that,  collectively,  are  second  in 
the  Line  Group  only  to  Christmas  Island  ( Kiribati )  in  diversity. 
For  several  historical  reasons,  the  natural  values  of  this 
spectacular  blend  of  marine  and  terrestrial  resources  have  been 
overlooked. 

Caroline  Atoll  (Chapter  Frontispiece)  is  situated  at  10°00'S 
latitude  and  I50°13'W  longitude  in  the  south-central  Pacific 
Ocean.  Caroline  is  the  southeasternmost  of  the  Southern  Line 
Islands,  a  group  of  three  islands  that  also  includes  Vostok  and 
Flint,  lying  230  km  to  its  west  and  southwest,  respectively. 
Although  anthropologically  and  geographically  within 
Polynesia,  Caroline  is  owned  by  the  Republic  of  Kiribati 
(formerly  Gilbert  and  Ellice  Islands). 

Caroline,  9.7  km  long,  2.3  km  wide  at  its  widest  point,  and 
26.9  km  in  circumference,  is  a  crescentic  coral  ring  with 
39  islets  centered  on  a  continuous  reef  enclosing  a  relatively 
shallow  lagoon.  Its  total  land  area  above  high  water  is  399  ha, 
with  islets  ranging  in  size  from  0.02  to  107.5  ha.  Islets 
extend  along  55%  of  the  reef  perimeter.  The  closed  lagoon, 
rich  in  marine  life,  contains  a  maze  of  patch  reefs  and  remarkably 
clear  water. 


The  island  was  "discovered"  by  de  Quiros  in  1606. 
Although  remnants  of  an  ancient  Tuamotuan  culture  still  exist, 
the  atoll  apparently  never  supported  a  long-term  permanent 
population  and  has  been  less  affected  by  man  than  most  Pacific 
islands.  Its  European  history  includes  guano  export,  a 
multinational  expedition  to  observe  a  solar  eclipse,  and  copra 
production.  It  has  been  uninhabited  since  the  early  1930's  (a 
factor  contributing  to  its  relatively  undisturbed  ecology),  except 
for  the  presence  of  one  family  from  1987  to  1991.  The  primary 
factors  responsible  for  its  lack  of  permanent  settlement  are 
remoteness,  apparent  absence  of  usable  ground  water,  the 
repeated  failure  of  its  coconut  plantations,  absence  of  a  passage 
into  the  lagoon,  a  paucity  of  safe  boat  anchorages,  and  an 
abundance  of  rats. 

Until  the  1988  US-USSR  Expedition  on  the  Akademik 
Korolev,  only  one  fairly  accurate  map  was  available,  which 
named  seven  islets.  We  have  drafted  an  accurate  map  based  on 
this  field  work  and  recent  aerial  photographs,  also  naming  32 
previously  unnamed  islets,  4  islet  groups,  and  an  inlet.  During 
8  days  of  intensive  field  work,  we  surveyed  all  39  islets, 
walking  33  km  in  systematic  cross-islet  transects  and  around 
islet  perimeters. 

Soils,  of  coral  and  molluscan  origin,  are  categorized  into 
five  types,  from  barren  coral  rubble  to  rubble  mixed  with 
humus  and  guano.  Caroline  provides  an  excellent  example  of 
soil  development  through  different  age  and  size  classes  of 
motus. 

Caroline's  near-pristine,  lush  native  vegetation  supports 
27  species  of  plants  organized  into  7  plant  communities — 
6  natural  and  1  anthropogenic.  The  atollwide  distribution  of 
each  plant  species  is  mapped.  Its  insular  flora,  typical  of  central 
equatorial  islands  in  their  natural  state,  is  85%  indigenous 
(possibly  up  to  93% ),  an  extremely  high  figure  for  anywhere  in 
the  world.  Though  Caroline's  islets  are  covered  with 
extensive  tracts  of  native  woodland,  the  Pisonia  grandis 
forests,  up  to  25  m  high,  are  particularly  notable  as  they 
constitute  some  of  the  best  groves  left  in  the  Pacific.  Toumefortia 
argentea  is  abundant,  and  Cordia  subcordata,  becoming 
quite  rare  elsewhere,  is  present  on  most  islets.  Cocos  is 
present,  but  only  dominates  one  islet;  22  islets  harbor  wholly 
indigenous  vegetation. 


Islets  of  many  different  age  and  size  classes  provide 
excellent  examples  of  soil  and  vegetation  development, 
accompanied  by  an  increasing  diversity  of  bird  life. 
On  account  of  its  relatively  low  human  disturbance  and  rapid 
recovery  to  a  more  natural  state,  especially  over  the  last 
70  years,  Caroline  is  one  of  the  few  Pacific  islands  that  is  truly 
an  "outdoor  ecological  laboratory."  Many  of  its  disturbed 
islets  have  recovered  so  remarkably  they  are  almost 
indistinguishable  from  those  that  have  remained  pristine. 

An  analysis  of  ecological  succession  on  motus  of  increasing 
size  reveals  that  by  the  time  a  motu  reaches  0.8  ha  in  size,  all 
the  natural  plant  communities,  most  plant  species,  and  most 
species  of  seabirds  are  present.  This  is  in  striking  contrast  to 
species-area  relationships  on  inhabited  atolls  with  more 
introduced  plant  species. 

Foreach  motu,  the  main  physiographic  features,  vegetation 
patterns,  seabird  colonies,  miscellaneous  biota  (coconut  crabs 
and  rats),  and  the  effects  of  human  activity  (if  any),  are 
described  in  detail.  Included  are  vegetation  maps  for  each 
motu,  and  tables  and  figures  relating  to  species-area 
relationships. 

Permanent  protection  of  Caroline  is  currently  being  sought 
by  The  Nature  Conservancy  of  Hawaii  as  it  negotiates  with  the 
government  of  Kiribati  for  a  Southern  Line  Islands  Wildlife 
Preserve,  which  includes  Caroline,  Vostok,  and  Flint. 

Geography 

Caroline  Atoll*  (Chapter  Frontispiece;  Figs.  1,2)  is  a 
small,  low  coral  atoll  situated  at  LOWS  latitude,  150°13'W 
longitude  in  the  south-central  Pacific  Ocean.  It  lies  2.800  km 
south  of  Hawaii.  830  km  north  of  Tahiti,  and  1 .030  km  west  of 
the  Marquesas  Islands.  Its  nearest  neighbors  are  Vostok  and 
Flint,  230  km  to  the  west  and  southwest,  respectively. 

A  recent  geographic  survey  of  Caroline  by  the  ICBP  1990 
Line  and  Phoenix  Islands  Expedition,  using  a  compact  satellite 
navigation  computer,  indicates  that  the  atoll  lies  one  nautical 
mile  east  of  its  previously  charted  longitude  position,  1 50°  1 4"  W. 
Its  range  of  coordinates  are  09°54'  to  10°01'S  latitude  and 
150°12'to  1 50°  14'W  longitude.  The  actual  coordinates  given. 
10°00'S  and  150°13'W,  intersect  in  the  lower  lagoon  just  west 
of  the  "blind  passage." 

Caroline  is  the  southeasternmost  of  the  Line  Group 
(Fig.  1 ),  a  widely  scattered  group  of  five  atolls,  five  islands,  and 
two  submerged  reefs  lying  in  the  south-central  Pacific  Ocean 
between  06°N  and  12°S  latitude  and  162  and  1 50°W  longitude. 
Scattered  across  250.000  km2  of  ocean,  the  Line  Group  falls 
naturally  into  two  parts:  the  Northern  Line  Islands,  four  atolls 
and  one  reef  north  of  the  equator,  and  the  Southern  Line 
Islands,  five  islands,  one  atoll,  and  one  reef  to  its  south.  The 
name,  Line  Group,  reflects  its  equator-straddling  location. 


■Note:  Caroline  Atoll  is  neither  physically,  geographically, 
nor  politically  associated  with  the  Caroline  Islands,  now  part  of 
the  Federated  States  of  Micronesia,  more  than  6.000  km  to  the 
northwest.  Because  of  this  confusion,  we  use  the  name  "Caroline 
Atoll"  instead  of  "Caroline  Island." 


Although  archaeologically  and  geographically  within 
Polynesia,  the  Line  Group  was  uninhabited  when  discovered 
by  Europeans;  its  islands  have  been  variously  claimed  by  the 
United  States  and  England.  With  the  exception  of  US-owned 
Jarvis,  Palmyra,  and  Kingman  Reef,  all  are  now  governed  by 
the  Republic  of  Kiribati  (formerly  Gilbert  Islands). 

Caroline.  9.7  km  long  by  2.3  km  wide  at  its  widest  point, 
is  a  crescentic  coral  ring  26.9  km  in  circumference.  It  is 
composed  of  39  islets  (Fig.  2)  and  a  few  incipient  islets, 
centered  on  a  continuous  reef  flat,  submerged  at  high  tide,  that 
encloses  a  relatively  shallow  lagoon.  The  total  land  area  above 
high  water  is  399  ha.  Entirely  of  coralline  origin,  its  geology, 
soils,  climate,  and  vegetation  are  typical  of  low-latitude  atolls. 
It  is  relatively  unmodified  by  man. 

History  of  Caroline  Atoll 

Pre-European  History:   Tuamotuan  Period 

Centuries  before  Europeans  encountered  Caroline,  this 
lonely  atoll  was  inhabited  by  Polynesians.  No  oral  traditions  of 
this  occupation  are  known,  but  evidence  of  former  habitation 
was  evident  when  de  Quiros  found  the  atoll  in  1606.  He  noted 
"an  old  canoe,  lying  on  her  side."  and  a  small  grove  of  coconuts 
planted  on  South  Island  (Bennett.  1840;  Markham.  1904). 

No  further  clues  to  the  atoll"  s  early  history  were  unearthed 
until  Messrs.  Brown,  Brothers,  and  Arundel  exposed  about  50 
ancient  Polynesian  sites  in  the  1870's  while  digging  for  guano 
(Holden,  1884;  Arundel,  1890).  Although  the  largest  two  were 
marked  as  "graves"  on  Arundel's  1883  map  (Fig.  4).  no  bones, 
ashes,  or  human  remains  were  found.  Natives  living  on 
Caroline  called  them  "marai"  (marae).  Arundel  photographed 
and  drew  plans  of  them  (Fig.  3):  depicted  are  a  platform  of  coral 
and  conglomerate  rock,  surrounded  by  10  smaller  slabs 
resembling  gravestones,  all  arranged  in  a  rectangular  plan. 
Their  findings  were  later  identified  as  Tuamotuan  manic 
( Emory.  1 947).  Manic,  according  to  ancient  belief,  "bound  the 
ancestral  spirits  and  gods  of  the  kindred  to  the  land,  putting  it 
under  their  eternal  guardianship"  (Emory.  1947).  The  largest 
manic  was  on  northwest  Nake  Island,  and  a  smaller  one  was 
found  near  the  southern  tip  of  Long  Island.  Both  locations 
conform  to  such  prerequisites  for  building  manic  as  nearby 
shorelines  and  birds  ( see  Description  and  Ecology  of  the  Motus 
section  [Nake  Island]),  which  Tuamotuans  believed  housed 
divine  spirits  (Emory,  1947.  p.  123).  Although  members  of  the 
ICBP  1990  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands  Expedition  located  them 
and  took  photographs  and  measurements  of  the  Nake  site 
(PI.  36).  no  field  work  by  archaeologists  has  been  conducted. 

Post-European  History:    17th  to  19th  Centuries 

On  21  February  1606.  the  Portuguese  explorer  Pedro 
Fernandez  de  Quiros.  employed  by  Spain,  "discovered"  Caroline 
Atoll  (Markham.  1904;  Stevens  &  Barwick.  1930).  naming  it 
San  Bernardo.  Despite  its  remote  location.  Caroline  was 
encountered  early  in  Pacific  history,  long  before  Tahiti. 
Rarotonga,  and  Hawaii.  This  is  possibly  due  to  its  location,  for 
early  navigators  tended  to  sail  due  west  from  South  America 
along  lines  of  latitude,  and  10  S  was  an  obvious  choice.  De 
Quiros.  the  last  ad\  enturer  in  the  Spanish  age  of  discovery,  was 


leading  his  second  major  trans-Pacific  expedition  with  3  ships 

and  1 50  men  obsessed  with  finding  the  fabled  "Terra  Australis 

Incognito."  The  descriptions  of  Caroline  by  his  crew,  although 

atvariance  with  one  another.still  apply  today(Pl.  1).  Theirfirst 

at-sea  impression  was  that  it  was  "divided  into  four  or  five 

hummocks,  and  all  the  rest  submerged.  Its  circumference 

appeared  to  be  ten  leagues"  (Markham,  1904).  After  landing, 

they  found  that 

There  was  a  great  number  offish  inshore,  and,  owing  to  the 

water  being  very  shallow,  they  were  killed  with  swords 

and  poles.    There  were  great  numbers  of  lobster  and 

crawfish,  and  other  kinds  of  marine  animals.  They  found 

a  great  quantity  of  cocoa-nuts  in  a  heap  at  the  foot  of  the 

palm  trees,  many  large,  and  of  different  sizes.  There  were 

a  great  quantity  of  sea  birds  of  several  kinds,  and  so 

importunate  that  they  seemed  to  want  to  attack  the  men. 

We  took  plenty  of  all  these  things. ..It  seemed  to  the 

Captain  that  on  an  island  where  there  are  so  many  trees 

there  could  not  fail  to  be  water.  (Markham,  1904) 

Fresh  water  was  crucial  to  de  Quiros  and  his  crew,  who 

were  suffering  from  lack  of  food  and  water.    Despite  their 

efforts,  however,  they  failed  to  obtain  water.  Disappointed  and 

lacking  energy,  they  continued  their  voyage  the  following 

morning.  Their  demoralized  state  may  explain  one  statement 

that  Caroline  "consisted  of  twenty-two  islets,  uninhabited  and 

without  water,  trees  or  scrub  for  wood." 

In  1795,  Captain  W.  R.  Broughton,  on  the  British  sloop 
Providence,  rediscovered  the  atoll  while  voyaging  from  Tahiti 
to  Hawaii.   He  named  it  in  honor  of  the  daughter  of  the  First 
Lord  of  the  British  Admiralty  (Broughton,  1804): 
The  southern  extremity  was  the  highest  part,  covered  with 
trees,  most  probably  cocoa-nut  from  their  appearance,  as 
they  stood  in  detached  clumps  along  the  shore.    The 
island.. .appeared  to  be  low,  and  covered  with  trees,  and  if 
I  am  right  in  its  estimated  distance,  its  length  will  be  about 
five  miles  in  a  north  and  south  direction.       I  named  it 
Carolina  Island  in  compliment  to  the  daughter  of  Sir  P. 
Stephens  of  the  Admiralty. 
Because  early  navigation  techniques  and  communication 
were  far  less  sophisticated  than  today,  especially  with  regards 
to  longitude,  Caroline  was  sighted  or  "discovered"  by  several 
more  explorers  who  were  unsure  of  its  identity.  By  1821  the 
atoll  had  amassed  an  impressive  collection  of  coordinates  and 
names:     San  Bernardo,  Island  of  Fish,  Thornton,  Hurst's, 
Clark's,  Independence,  and  Carolina  (which  later  became 
Caroline).   Some  navigators  equated  Caroline  with  an  island 
named  "San  Bernardo"  by  the  Spanish  explorer  Mendana  in 
1595.    Mendana's  island  has  only  recently  been  verified  as 
Puka-Puka  in  the  northern  Cook  Islands  (Maude,  1968). 

The  best  early  descriptive  account  of  the  atoll's  flora  and 
fauna  comes  from  an  1835  visit  by  F.  D.  Bennett,  who  was 
reasonably  well  versed  in  natural  history  (Bennett,  1840).  He 
noted  that  the  islets  then,  as  now,  were  "covered  with 
verdure. ..surprisingly  luxuriant,  when  compared  to  the  arid 
soil  it  covers."  Although  Bennett  had  visited  many  atolls,  he 
was  particularly  impressed  with  the  quality  of  Caroline's  coral 
reefs.    His  party  observed  "rats  of  a  red-brown  color"  and 


various  birds  but  no  reptiles  (Subchapter  1.2).  Although  he 
discusses  "land  lobsters  (Coenobita  species),"  no  mention  is 
made  of  coconut  ciabs  (Birgus  latro). 

First  Occupation:  The  existence  of  two  small  coconut 
groves  on  Caroline  prompted  two  British  entrepreneurs, 
representing  the  Tahitian  firm  Collie  &  Lucett,  to  establish  a 
stock  raising  venture  there  in  1846.  This  first  known  settlement 
was  located  adjacent  to  the  main  coconut  grove  on  the  northwest 
peninsula  of  South  Island;  a  smaller  grove  evidently  existed 
"on  the  south-south-west  side"  of  the  same  island  (Lucett, 
1851 ).  Tahitian  laborers  tended  pigs,  hens,  turkeys,  and  grew 
many  food  plants,  including  pumpkins  and  melons.  They  dried 
and  salted  fish,  planted  coconuts,  and  extracted  coconut  oil 
(Maude,  1942a;Garnett,  1983  (and  were  evidently  still  therein 
May  1852  (Ellsworth,  1990). 

Political  Annexation:  Though  inhabited  in  prehistory  by 
Tuamotuans,  officially  "discovered"  by  the  Spanish,  and  visited 
by  British,  French,  and  American  ships,  it  took  centuries  for 
Caroline  to  acquire  a  political  identity.  It  was  formally  annexed 
to  Britain  by  Captain  Nares,  R.  N.,  who  arrived  in  the  H.M.S. 
Reindeer  in  1868,  finding  27  residents. 

Caroline  was  under  the  control  of  various  merchants  in  the 
late  19th  century:  Lionel  Brown,  Captain  Brothers,  and  later 
John  Arundel,  a  well-known  businessman,  trader,  and  guano 
merchant  in  the  Pacific.  Arundel's  1883  map  (Fig.  4)  of 
Caroline  is  the  only  reasonably  correct  chart  published  until 
this  paper. 

The  Guano  Era:  Though  bonded  under  the  American 
Guano  Act  in  1860,  no  phosphate  was  dug  on  Caroline  until 
Arundel  was  granted  a  7-year  license  in  1874.  A  few  months 
earlier,  a  set  of  moorings  was  laid  off  the  lee  side  of  South 
Island,  allowing  ships  of  up  to  1 ,000  tons  to  lie  safely  during 
trade  wind  weather.  Guano  was  the  only  successful  business 
venture  at  Caroline:  approximately  10,000  tons  were  shipped 
to  California  and  Australia  between  1873  and  1895,  when 
supplies  became  exhausted  (Young,  ca.  1922). 

Solar  Eclipse  Expedition:  In  1883,  Caroline  received 
international  publicity  when  astronomers  calculated  that  it  lay 
directly  under  the  path  of  a  pending  solar  eclipse.  As  a  result, 
three  parties  of  astronomers  (American,  British,  and  French) 
set  up  camp  on  South  Island,  making  detailed  observations  of 
this  celestial  event  (PI.  2a).  At  that  time  Caroline  was  more 
famous,  and  housed  more  people,  than  before  or  since:  7 
"natives,"  scientists,  and  crewmen  totaled  5 1  occupants. 
Legacies  from  former  inhabitants  included  three  houses 
(PI.  2b),  two  sheds,  three  huts  on  smaller  motus,  nautical 
flotsam  and  jetsam,  and  two  shallow  wells.  To  this  they  added 
tents,  observatory  frames,  a  marble  slab,  flagpole,  and  brick 
"piers"  for  their  telescopes,  most  of  which  remained  as 
technological  litter. 

This  expedition  (Dixon,  1884;  Holden,  1884;  Holden  & 
Qualtrough,  1884;  Trelease,  1884;  Young,  1884)  also  marked 
the  first  attempt  to  describe  the  topography,  climate,  flora,  and 
fauna  of  the  atoll.  Drawings  included  an  artist's  rendering  of 
Caroline  and  map  of  the  "settlement"  (PI.  3)  and  views  along 
South  Island's  lagoon  shore  (Pis.  4,  5).  Another  map  (Fig.  5) 
was  drafted  but  is  highly  inaccurate. 


Observations  by  the  astronomers  on  vegetation,  birds, 
insects,  reptiles,  marine  organisms,  et  cetera  were  sketch) 
( Butler  &Strecker,  1884;  Dixon,  1884).  Dixon,  the  zoologist, 
listed  such  organisms  as  •'shrimp."  "'hermit  crabs,"  "gnat," 
et  cetera.  As  with  Bennett,  there  was  no  mention  of  coconut 
crabs,  even  though  they  were  evidently  abundant  on  South 
Island  in  1910  (Young,  ca.  1922). 

The  Late  lVth  and  20th  Centuries 

In  1875.  C.  D.  Voy.  a  naturalist  from  California  visited 
Caroline,  collecting  mollusks  (Pilsbry  &  Vanatta,  1905a.b) 
and  fish  (Fowler,  1901). 

As  early  as  1885,  Arundel  began  to  clear  land  and  plant 
coconuts,  but  his  planned  copra  industry  was  unsuccessful.  In 
I S97  he  sold  his  business  to  the  Pacific  Islands  Company.  Ltd., 
which  also  failed.  The  coconut  plantations  suffered  from 
disease  and  poor  vitality,  and  populations  of  Polynesian  rats 
apparently  exploded.  By  1904,  when  the  H.M.S.  Icarus  visited 
Caroline,  only  six  Polynesians  lived  there.  A  few  months  later 
they  were  repatriated  to  Niue,  and  Caroline  remained 
uninhabited  until  1916.  when  a  new  effort  was  made  to  develop 
the  coconut  plantation  by  Messrs.  S.  R.  Maxwell  &  Co.,  Ltd. 
During  the  uninhabited  years.  South  Island"s  vegetation 
and  wildlife  began  to  recover  from  the  earlier  forest  felling 
( Pis.  2-4).  When  Mr.  J.  L.  Young,  then  managing  director  for 
S.  R.  Maxwell  &  Co.,  Ltd.  ( Young,  ca.  1 922 ),  visited  the  atoll 
in  July  1910,  he  described  it  as  a  wilderness,  teeming  with  sooty 
terns,  fish  and  coconut  crabs: 

The  ground  was  covered  with  nests  of  seabirds  which 

latter  rose  like  a  cloud  when  disturbed:  the  noise  of  their 

shrieking  was  so  great  that  one  had  to  shout  to  enable 

oneself  to  be  heard  by  his  companions.  Hundreds  of  great 

Coconut  Crabs  were  seen:  40  large  ones  were  caught  by 

the  crew  of  the  schooner  in  an  hour.   The  reef  and  the 

lagoon  swarmed  with  fish  and  small  sharks. 

From  1 9 1 6  to  1 929.  Caroline  was  altered  more  than  before 

ui  since.    All  the  available  land  on  .South  was  deforested  to 

make  room  for  thousands  of  palms,  and  laborers  demolished 

huge  numbers  of  coconut  crabs  and  seabirds.  which  were 

thought  to  damage  the  palms  (Young,  ca.  1922).   In  addition. 

coconuts  were  planted  on  all  of  the  main  windward  islets. 

southern  Nake.  and  on  Mannikiba.  Plantation  workers  in  great 

part  lived  oil  the  land,  feasting  on  fresh  fish,  seabirds.  seabird 

eggs,  turtles,  and  coconut  crabs. 

Copra  exports  averaged  around  1 4  tons  per  year  from  1929 
to  1 934.  after  which  the  company  ran  into  debt.  Concurrently, 
the  French  government  forbade  further  recruitment  from  Tahiti; 
b>  l936onl>  a  lew  families  were  left (N.I.D.,  1943).  In  1941 
(he  atoll  earned  a  price  tag  of  000  English  pounds  (Maude, 
personal  communication),  but  was  never  purchased. 

Occupation  leases  for  Caroline  were  canceled  in  1943. 
after  which  the  British  Western  Pacific  High  Commission 
repossessed  it  (Maude,  1953).  However.nev.  "queen's  leases" 
were  granted  to  M.  P.  A.  Bainbridge  of  Papeete.  Tahiti 
( 1 95  I  -  1 964 )  ( Nicholson  &  Douglas.  1 969),  (hen  ( 'aplam  ( )mer 
Darr  ( 1964-1989)  of  Moorea.  French  Polynesia.    When  the 


British  granted  independence  to  the  Gilbert  and  Ellice  Islands 
in  1979,  a  new  country,  the  Republic  of  Kiribati  (pronounced 
"Keer-ee-bahss")  assumed  ownership  of  Caroline,  along  with 
most  of  the  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands. 

Apart  from  occasional  parties  of  Tahitians  cutting  copra 
and  a  shipw  recked  sailor  in  the  early  1 880's.  the  atoll  remained 
uninhabited  for  over  50  vears.  During  this  time.  Caroline's 
vegetation  and  w  ildlife  recovered  to  such  an  extent  that,  were 
it  not  for  unpublished  manuscripts  from  Maude  (Maude, 
ca.  1938.ca.  1 942a.  and  no  date  (.including  Young' s(ca.  1922) 
"Memoranda  re  Tahitian  Business"our  detailed  vegetation 
analysis  (including  tree  diameters),  and  the  1 990 comparisons 
with  Flint  and  Vostok.  we  would  have  been  unaware  of  the 
actual  extent  of  previous  human  interference  or  of  the  rapidity 
of  forest  recovery  (the  fact  that  60<7r  of  Caroline's  motus 
harbored  wholly  indigenous  vegetation  seemed  to  point  to  a 
relatively  pristine  atoll). 

In  1987.  the  Office  de  la  Recherche  Scientifique  et 
Technique  Outre-Mer  ( ORSTOM.  a  French  scientific  research 
agency)  was  requested  by  the  Kiribati  government  to  conduct 
a  short  study  at  Caroline  on  the  feasibility  of  pearl-shell  culture 
(G.  Monet,  personal  communication).  Their  results  concluded 
that  the  atoll  would  be  inappropriate  for  this  type  of  development. 

Also  in  1987,  a  Scotsman.  Ron  Falconer,  his  French  wife 
Anne,  and  two  small  children  settled  on  Caroline  as  volunteer 
custodians.  From  October  1989  to  November  1990  a  new  lease 
was  under  negotiation  by  Felix  Urima.  a  French  businessman, 
who  planned  to  blast  a  channel  through  the  reef,  construct  an 
airstrip,  build  a  small  hotel,  cut  timber,  and  engage  in  various 
commercial  ventures  including  fishing,  a  turtle  farm,  and  pearl- 
shell  culture.  In  April  1 990.  Urima' s  workers  began  commercial 
fishing,  killing  turtles  and  coconut  crabs,  and  clearing  land 
( Kepler.  1 990a).  This  w  as  a  major  new  insult  to  the  atoll  which, 
in  spite  of  its  long  history  of  intermittent  human  occupation, 
remains  to  this  day  "possibly  one  of  the  least  spoiled  o(  true 
atolls  in  the  Pacific"  (Stoddart.  1976).  Reports  from  our 
expeditions  to  Caroline  (Kepler  &  Kepler.  1989;  Kepler. 
1990a.d)  resulted  in  the  short-lived  cancellation  of  Urima' s 
tentative  lease  in  November  1990.  As  of  this  writing.  Urima 
has  returned  to  unlimited  fishing  at  Caroline's  reefs.  The 
government  of  Kiribati  appears  amenable  to  negotiations  for  a 
wildlife  preserve  (see  Subchapter  1.2  [Conservation  section], 
this  volume ).  Conservation  efforts  are  presently  underway  tor 
Caroline  to  become  part  of  a  triple-island  wildlife  presen  e  with 
Vostok  and  Flint  (see  Subchapter  1.2  [Conservation  section], 
this  volume). 

20th  Century  Scientific  Studies:  In  June  1965, afield  party 
from  the  Smithsonian  Institution's  Pacific  Ocean  Biological 
Survey  Program  ( POBSP)  visited  Caroline  for  2  days  ( Clapp  & 
Sibley.  1971a).  Then  vsurvej  and  specimens  added  much  to  the 
pre\  ious  botanical  and  ornithological  know  ledge  of  the  island. 
Other  quick  visits  were  made  b\  the  Line  Islands  Expedition  on 
9-10  September  1974  and  by  Roger  Perry,  then  Wildlife 
Warden  of  the  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands,  on  12-13  November 
1977.  Eleven  years  later  the  present  authors  surveyed  the 
terrestrial  env  ironments  of  Caroline  more  thoroughly  than  had 


been  previously  attempted.  This  visit  was  part  of  the  Third 
Joint  US-USSR  Bering  &  Chukehi  Seas  Expedition,  a 
4-month  voyage  that  also  ineluded  oceanographic  studies  in 
the  Pacific  Ocean  and  South  China  Sea. 

In  1990,  one  of  the  authors  (AKK)  visited  Caroline  twice 
with  the  International  Council  for  Bird  Preservation  (ICBP) 
1990  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands  Expedition.  These  visits  were 
primarily  to  discuss  conservation  matters  with  the  Falconers; 
introduce  Caroline  to  Dr.  and  Mrs.  M.  Garnett,  representatives 
from  ICBP;  confirm  the  illegal  taking  of  fish,  turtles,  and 
coconut  crabs  by  Mr.  Urima's  men;  find  the  Tuamotuan 
maraes;  survey  North  Arundel  Islet;  collect  invertebrates;  and 
fill  in  missing  details  from  the  1988  expedition. 

Methods 

From  22  to  29  September  1988,  Drs.  A.  K.  Kepler,  C.  B. 
Kepler,  D.  H.  Ellis  (USA),  and  Mr.  Katino  Teeb'aki  (Republic 
of  Kiribati)  surveyed  all  39  motus  at  Caroline  Atoll  (Fig.  2), 
gathering  detailed  information  on  plants,  seabirds,  land  birds, 
mammals,  reptiles,  coconut  crabs,  and  human  disturbance. 
Some  incidental  data  have  been  added  from  the  two  visits  in 
1990  (10-13  March,  18-28  May)  by  Dr.  A.K.  Kepler,  Captain 
G.  Wragg,  A.  Garnett,  M.  Linsley.  J.  Phillips  (March),  and 
Dr.  M.  Garnett  (May). 

Prior  to  the  first  expedition,  a  series  of  transects  and  known 
botanical  information  were  mapped  to  ensure  that  5%  of  each 
motu  was  sampled  and  to  maximize  our  chances  of  encountering 
all  known  plant  species.  Transects  on  the  larger  motus  (Nake, 
Long,  South )  were  spaced  approximately  400  m  apart  and,  with 
one  exception,  were  perpendicular  to  the  long  axes  of  each  islet 
(Tr.  3  on  Nake  extended  first  from  east  to  west,  then  ran  south 
parallel  to  the  west  coast).  If  the  motus  were  greater  than 
400  m  long,  we  used  two  transects.  Transects  on  the  smaller 
motus  passed  through  their  widest  points  (Fig.  8).  Their 
lengths  ranged  from  77  m  (Azure)  to  2,000  m  (Tr.  3,  Nake). 

Considerable  modifications  were  required  when  we  realized 
that  the  Clapp&  Sibley  ( 197  la)  map  (Fig.  7)  was  incorrect.  We 
redrew  the  transects  on  Arundel's  1883  map  (Fig.  4),  secured 
just  prior  to  the  expedition.  On  South  Island,  due  to  impenetrable 
draperies  of  Ipomoea  vines,  Tr.  3  was  omitted,  Tr.  5  ran  only 
from  the  lagoon  south  to  the  Ipomoea  curtain  (75  m),  and 
Trs.  4  and  6  ran  north  and  south  until  we  reached  an  impasse 
(PI.  7). 

Compass  headings  were  determined  by  the  configuration 
of  each  island.  Beginning  at  high  water  mark,  all  distances 
(islet  dimensions,  widths  of  reef  flats  and  substrates,  and  plant 
communities)  were  measured  using  hip  chains  with 
biodegradable  cotton  thread.  These  parameters  were  later 
checked  against  aerial  photographs  in  stereoscopic  pairs  taken 
in  1 985  by  the  Royal  New  Zealand  Air  Force  ( RNZAF),  which 
provided  3-dimensional  overviews  of  every  islet.  Vegetation 
maps  for  each  islet  were  constructed  by  drawing  the  outlines 
and  plant  communities  (based  on  the  aerial  photos)  on  graph 
paper,  enlarging,  then  counting  dots. 

Data  were  collected  in  a  30-m  (15  m  to  each  side  of  the 
transect)  swath  along  each  transect  and  recorded  on  field 
forms.    Within  each  plant  community  we  took  photographs. 


assessed  the  relative  abundance  of  each  plant  species  (rare, 
uncommon,  common,  very  common,  abundant,  and  locally 
common;  see  Vegetation  section )  and  recorded  plant  community 
width,  plants  collected,  and  substrate  type.  We  also  estimated 
the  maximum  height  of  the  dominant  vegetation  and  percentage 
of  ground  area  covered  by  each  species. 

In  addition  to  the  linear  transects,  an  additional  19,300  m 
of  perimeter  surveys  were  conducted  on  21  islets  (Fig.  9).  The 
combined  distance  for  linear  and  perimeter  transects  was 
32.6  km.  Seven  tiny  islets  (Noddy  Rock,  Skull,  Atibu,  Bosun 
Bird,  Coral,  Reef-flat,  Fishball)  were  surveyed  completely. 

In  1988.  we  camped  on  the  atoll  for  seven  nights, 
establishing  base  camps  ( Fig.  8;  Pis.  6,8)  on  the  northwest  point 
of  South  (22-24  September)  and  southwest  Long 
(25-28  September).  We  relocated  camps  using  a  Zodiac  with 
outboard  motor  and  an  inflatable  Sevylor  canoe  (PI.  9).  All 
transects  were  surveyed  during  daylight  hours,  beginning  at 
dawn.  Walking  the  interislet  channels  was  relatively  easy  at 
low  tide,  but  became  hazardous  at  incoming  or  high  tide,  as  the 
numerous  black-tipped  reef  sharks,  Carcharhinusmelanopterus 
(PI.  10),  regularly  charged  at  our  legs  and  had  to  be  beaten  off 
with  sticks  and  coral  chunks. 

During  the  1990  visits,  we  stayed  on  Motu  Ana- Ana  with 
the  Falconers.  Work  was  not  intensive,  as  in  1988.  We  walked 
or  motored  an  inflatable  Lancer,  visiting  20  motus:  Ana-Ana, 
Kimoa,  Pisonia,  Eitei,  South,  North  Arundel,  Noddy  Rock, 
Brothers,  North  Brothers,  Skull,  Pig,  North  Pig,  Bo'sun  Bird, 
Long,  Nake,  Mouakena,  Shark,  Scarlet  Crab,  Bird,  and  Fishball. 
Insects  were  preserved  in  ethyl  alcohol.  We  used  a  "Magellan" 
NAV  1000  to  obtain  accurate  geographical  coordinates  of 
Caroline. 

Naming  Caroline 's  Motus 

Previous  literature  has  provided  vague  or  incomplete  data 
on  Caroline's  constituent  motus  (Bennett,  1840;  Holden  & 
Qualtrough,  1884;Markham,  1904;  Stevens  &Barwick,  1930; 
Bryan,  1942;  Clapp  &  Sibley.  1971a;  Garnett,  1983).  This 
confusion  resulted  because  most  previous  visits  had  been  brief. 
The  only  charts  available  were  a  quite  accurate  survey  by 
Arundel,  a  guano  merchant  who  mapped  the  atoll  in  1883 
( Fig.  4;  Admiralty  Chart,  No.  979,  1 965 ),  and  a  map.  greatly  in 
error,  drafted  by  an  international  Solar  Eclipse  Party,  also  in 
1883  (Fig.  5).  There  are  no  hydrological  navigation  charts. 
Unfortunately,  the  eclipse  party  map  has  been  used  in  all 
subsequent  scientific,  historical,  and  sociological  publications 
(Bryan,  1942  [Fig.  6];  Maude.  1968;  Clapp  &  Sibley,  1971a 
[Fig.  7];  Garnett,  1983).  It  shows  only  25  of  the  39  islets  and 
many  of  the  shapes  are  distorted.  The  38  islets  on  Arundel's 
map  are  similar  to  those  in  the  RNZAF  (1986)  aerial 
photographs.  Only  a  few  islets  appear  to  have  changed  in 
minor  ways  since  1883:  major  discrepancies  in  Arundel's  map. 
we  believe,  are  due  to  difficulties  involved  in  the  accurate 
rendition  of  small  land  areas  (i.e.,  the  South  Nake  Islets). 
Maude  (ca.  1938)  counted  36  islets  but  never  published  his 
information. 

To  aid  our  survey  we  named  32  islets  and  4  islet  groups 
(Fig.  2).  Our  names,  whether  in  English  or  Gilbertese,  reflect 
appropriate  aspects  of  islet  biology.  Etymology  is  provided  in 


the  Description  and  Ecology  of  the  Motus  section.  Gilbertese 
names  are  prefixed  with  motu.  Any  name  not  appearing  on 
Arundel's  map  ( Fig.  4)  was  given  to  the  islets  by  us.  They  have 
been  sent  to  the  British  Admiralty  and  US  Hydrographic  Office 
(along  with  corrections  to  the  Pacific  Pilot)  for  official 
recognition. 

Structure  and  Topography 

General  Account 

Caroline,  one  of  the  oceanic  islands  contributing  to 
Darwin's  theory  of  atoll  formation  (Darwin.  1842),  is  a  low 
island  derived  entirely  from  coral  reefs  and  mollusks,  living 
and  dead.  Although  undoubtedly  resting  upon  an  ancient 
basaltic  base,  today's  atoll  reveals  no  visible  fragments  of  its 
volcanic  heritage.  "The  atoll  consists  of  a  chain  of  twenty-five 
[sic]  little  islets,  well  covered  with  trees  and  shrubbery,  the 
whole  forming  a  quiet  scene  of  grove  and  lake,  charmingly  set 
off  by  the  contrasting  ocean"  (Holden  &  Qualtrough,  1884). 
This  description  could  apply  equally  well  today.  Caroline  is 
actually  composed  of  a  ring  of  39  "permanent"  and  3  incipient 
islets  whose  total  area  is  398.94  ha.  Most  are  well  wooded,  but 
four  tiny  ones,  less  than  0. 1  ha  in  size,  are  scarcely  more  than 
coral  rubble  piled  on  the  reef,  supporting  sparse  patches  of 
Tournefortia  and  Heliotropium.  One  islet.  Noddy  Rock 
(PI.  19),  is  a  vestige  of  a  former  reef  segment. 

Our  terminology  is  based  on  Tracey  et  al.  (1955)  as  cited 
by  Wiens  (1962),  to  which  we  have  one  addition.  The  name 
motu,  Polynesian  for  "islet"  or  "small  island,"  is  now  a  technical 
term  for  detrital  reef  islands  (Danielsson,  1954;  Stoddart  & 
Gibbs,  1975).  In  this  paper  the  terms  motu  and  islet  are  used 
interchangeably;  however,  as  motu  is  now  a  bona  fide  English 
word  and  not  italicized,  it  may  be  pluralized  by  adding  an  "s" 
(normally  Polynesian  words  are  not  pluralized  with  "s"). 

Caroline's  overall  shape  is  like  a  flattened  crescent.  9.7  km 
long  on  its  north-south  axis.  Its  perimeter  is  26.9  km.  measured 
along  the  outer  reef.  Its  greatest  breadth  ( including  both  reefs), 
2.3  km,  lies  centrally  along  an  east-west  transect  that  includes 
Motu  Mannikiba  and  lower  Long  Island.  The  longest  islet. 
Long,  extends  4.23  km  from  north  to  south,  while  South  Island, 
extending  1.2  km  from  east  to  west,  claims  the  widest  stretch 
of  land. 

The  motus,  lying  upon  a  wide,  continuous  reef  flat  which 
encloses  an  elongated,  relatively  shallow  lagoon,  fall  naturally 
into  groupings  of  3  large  islands  (South,  Nake,  Long)  and 
4  groups  of  smaller  islets!  13  Windwards,  5  Southern  Leewards, 
1  I  Central  Leewards,  7  South  Nakes).  There  are  four  basic 
motu  shapes: 

/.    long,  linear,  and  parallel  to  the  reef  axis  (e.g..  Long 
Island); 

2.  small,  linear  or  oval,  and  perpendicular  to  the  reel  axis 
(e  g.,  Southern  Leeward  Islets  i; 

3.  triangularorcrescentic.withtheapex  lacing  the  seaward 
reel  (e.g..  most  of  the  Windward  Islets);  and 

4.  large  and  quadrangular,  occupying  the  ends  of  the  atoll 
(e.g..  South.  Nake). 

All  individual  motus  are  discussed  m  detail  in  the 
Description  and  Ecology  of  the  Motus  section. 


Reef  Flats 

Caroline's  peripheral  reefs,  which  completely  surround 
the  lagoon  and  upon  which  the  motus  rest,  are  consistently  wide 
(average  562  m,  range  396-759  m,  N  =  100).  The  windward 
and  leeward  reefs  differ  in  structure  and  dimensions.  Neither 
are  entirely  dry,  even  at  the  lowest  tides.  They  consist  primarily 
of  barren  calcareous  rock,  which  on  other  atolls  generally 
represents  the  erosional  surface  of  an  older  reef.  Jagged 
"mushrooms"  of  newer  (but  dead)  reef  dot  the  leeward  reefs 
(PI.  11 ).  There  are  no  passes  from  ocean  to  lagoon,  a  typical 
feature  of  central  Pacific  atolls  (Wiens,  1962).  The  combined 
area  of  intertidal  and  subtidal  marine  environments  that  they 
enclose  is  several  times  the  areaoccupied  by  terrestrial  habitats. 

In  the  Southern  Hemisphere,  reef  flats  tend  to  be  widest  in 
the  southwest  sector  and  narrowest  in  the  northeast  (Wiens, 
1962).  Caroline's  reefs  are  quite  wide  throughout  the  west 
(PI.  12),  and  definitely  narrowest  in  the  northeast  off  Nake 
(PI.  13). 

The  reef  rim.  irregularly  dentate  and  26.9  km  in 
circumference,  is  surmounted  by  islets  for  55%  of  its  length. 
On  72%  of  all  Pacific  atolls,  less  than  half  the  reef  circumference 
is  occupied  by  land  (Wiens.  1962).  Caroline  lies  within  a  28% 
minority  in  which  one-half  to  two-thirds  of  the  reef  rim  contains 
land.  Corresponding  values  for  2  Tuamotuan  atolls.  Rangiroa 
and  Raroia.  are  33%  and  35%  (Stoddart  &  Sachet.  1969). 
Where  motus  exist,  the  reef  flat  is  divided  into  the  seaward  reef 
flat  (PI.  12),  islet,  and  lagoon  reef  flat  (PI.  14). 

At  low  tide  all  reef  fiats  are  wadable.  Black-tipped  reef 
sharks  were  a  threat  to  our  safety  in  most  areas  in  1988,  but  by 
1 990  dozens  had  been  killed.  The  reef  segments  that  separated 
the  Southern  and  Central  Leeward  groups  and  the  Leeward  and 
South  Nake  groups  were  particularly  hazardous.  Within  these 
islet  clusters,  names  such  as  Blackfin,  Shark,  and  Danger 
reflected  this  ubiquitous  feature  of  Caroline. 

The  only  tidal  measurements  taken  were  by  the  Solar 
Eclipse  Party  (Holden  &  Qualtrough.  1884).  who  noted  that  in 
May  1 883  the  greatest  daily  fluctuation  ranged  from  a  maximum 
of  475  mm  (1'  7")  to  a  minimum  of  125  mm  (0' 5"),  similar  to 
that  (around  2')  in  the  Tuamotus  (Stoddart  &  Sachet.  1969); 
Arundel's  map  (Fig.  4)  gives  0.5  m  ( 1.5')  for  Caroline,  which 
we  have  tentatively  used  in  the  schematic  profiles 
(Figs.  34-36)  as  the  difference  between  low  and  high  spring 
tidal  levels. 

Windward  Reef  Flats:  Constantly  pounded  by  surf 
(PI.  16).  the  windward  reefs  are  typically  narrower  than  those 
to  leeward,  averaging  5 19  m  ( range  396-759  in),  though  this  is 
less  evident  from  a  map  than  in  the  field. 

The  windward  reefs  are  13.5  km  long,  surmounted  by  16 
motus  that  total  63%  of  its  length.  This  is  not  surprising,  as  a 
recurrent  pattern  on  central  Pacific  and  Tuamotuan  atolls  is  that 
motus  are  more  frequent  along  windward  reef  rims  (Thomas. 
1961;  Wiens.  1962).  The  longest  islets  are  Nake  ( 1.980  inland 
Long  (4.226  m),  both  formed  from  the  coalescence  of  two  or 
more  smaller  islets  (Figs.  37-39).  The  rest  vary  from  1 S  m  to 
858  m  in  length. 

The  character  of  these  reef  Hats  differs,  depending  on  the 
presence  or  absence  of  land,  interisland  distances,  lagoon 
depth,  and  recent  weather  conditions.  In  February  1990.  part 


10 


of  a  hurricane  hit  Caroline,  rearranging  tons  of  coral  rubble  and 
sand  on  the  windward  beaches  and  motus,  tearing  out 
Tournefortia  scrub,  obliterating  much  of  the  native  herb  mat, 
exposing  beachrock,  depositing  large  chunks  of  broken  reef  on 
the  seaward  reef  flats,  and  changing  the  sizes  and  shapes  of  the 
beach  crests. 

Reef  Rim  w  ith  Motu:  The  w  idth  of  the  seaward  flats  is 
quite  uniform,  averaging  307  m  (range  1 93-396  m),  occupying 
517c  of  the  rim  width.  It  consists  of  a  slightly  raised  algal  ridge 
bearing  the  brunt  of  incessant  wave  action  and  a  rubbly  reef  flat, 
partly  drying  at  low  water,  which  sweeps  up  to  the  motu's 
beach  (PI.  16).  Adjacent  to  Nake,  in  the  northeast,  the  seaward 
margin  forms  a  shallow  moat  separating  the  land  and  algal 
ridge  (PI.  13). 

The  motus  differ  considerably  in  width,  ranging  from  the 
narrow  tip  of  Long,  merely  30  m  wide,  to  Windward,  290  m 
wide.  Nake  and  South  islands,  forming  "caps"  to  the  atoll  at  its 
upper  and  lower  ends,  respectively,  exhibit  characteristics 
more  typical  of  windward  than  leeward  motus.  Because  coral 
debris  accumulates  wherever  atoll  reefs  turn  sharply  (Thomas. 
1961),  these  two  motus  are  the  widest  on  the  atoll  (Pis.  16.17). 
A  comparison  of  maps  a  century  apart  ( Figs.  2.4)  indicates  that 
several  layered  ridges  of  coral  debris  have  accumulated  on 
northern  Nake  since  1883. 

Reel  Rim  without  Motu:  Zonation  within  the  reef  flat  is 
less  marked  where  there  is  no  land.  Within  these  interislet  reef 
flats,  however,  certain  areas  of  high  water  transport  have 
carved  surge  channels  and  grooves.  These  are  particularly 
e\  ident  at  the  north  and  south  ends  of  islets  ( PI.  18),  between 
islets,  and  within  the  longer  flats.  In  all  these  areas,  tidal  tans 
extend  into  the  lagoon  especially  at  its  northern  end  where 
sedimentation  is  most  active.  Caroline  has  no  deep  pass  or 
navigable  channels  into  the  lagoon  nor  a  ship  anchorage 
beyond  the  reef,  though  small  boats  may  anchor  within  the 
close  lee  of  South  Island  during  normal  trade  winds  and  low 
seas.  Landing  in  an  inflatable  is  best  made  across  the  reef 
slightly  north  of  the  "boat  entrance"  (marked  by  an  upright 
anchor  I. 

The  reef  flat  between  Tridacna  and  South  Island,  serrated 
with  6  erosional  grooves,  one  labelled  "blind  passage."  is  of 
particular  importance  to  navigators.  Its  most  southerly  channel 
is  a  narrow  diverticulum  380  in  long  within  a  reef  430  m  wide. 
On  all  previously  published  maps  this  passage  is  drawn  as 
though  it  completely  connects  ocean  and  lagoon  (Figs.  4-7). 
However,  it  is  a  true  blind  channel  (Fig.  50),  serving  as  a 
sheltered  anchorage  for  motored  yachts  near  its  lagoon  end.  hut 
cannot  be  entered  or  exited  during  high  winds  or  moderate-to- 
high  surf. 

Leeward  Reef  Flats:  These  are  wider,  flatter,  gentler,  more 
consolidated,  and  less  filled  with  rubble  than  the  windward 
reefs(Pl.  1 1 ).  Everywhere  except  within  the  surge  channels,  an 
orange-colored  alga  blankets  the  coralheads.  chunks  of  upraised 
coral  (PI.  11).  carbonate  rock,  and  giant  clams.  This  alga  is 
found  on  many  atolls — for  example  Enewetak  and  Rangiroa 
(Stoddart  &  Sachet.  1969:  US  Department  of  Energy.  1987). 
Living  coral  is  sparse. 


Surge  Channels:  These  occur  in  a  variety  of  shapes  and 
sizes,  depending  on  the  distances  between  motus,  the  extent 
and  buildup  of  reef  flats  adjacent  to  land,  and  lagoon  depth. 
Surge  channels  and  reef  grooves  (hoa)  are  deeper  on  the 
windward  side.  Aerial  photos  indicate  that  the  vigorous 
currents  washing  daily  into  Caroline's  lagoon  have  created 
largerdebris  fans  between  windward  motus  than  between  those 
to  leeward  (see  Chapter  Frontispiece). 

Beaches 

Caroline's  beaches — the  zones  lying  between  low  water 
mark  and  the  inland  limit  of  wave-deposited  debris — are  entirely 
of  reef  origin.  There  is,  however,  considerable  variation  in  the 
sizes  of  coral  rubble,  and  the  proportions  of  sand  and  silt  with 
which  they  are  mingled.  In  general,  the  windward  beaches  and 
surge  channels,  subject  to  winds  and  swells  and  in  a  constant 
state  of  erosion  or  deposition,  support  the  greatest  variety  of 
sediments:  well-sorted  sands;  gravels  of  coralline,  algal,  and 
molluscan  origin;  and  a  wide  variety  of  sizes  of  coral  rubble. 

Almost  all  exposed  rubble  on  Caroline  is  colored  from 
pale  to  dark  gray ,  aconsequence  of  penetration  by  cyanobacteria 
(Fosberg,  1953).  Typically  the  oldest  rubbles,  highest  up  the 
beach  and  extending  into  the  interior,  are  darkest.  A  marked 
beach  crest  rises — gently  or  abruptly — from  the  windward 
beaches,  at  the  crest  of  which  is  deposited  an  assortment  of 
flotsam  and  jetsam:  bottles,  plastic,  wood,  coconuts,  et  cetera 
(Pis.  16,20).  No  large  chunks  ofdisengaged  reef  were  found  on 
or  near  land  in  1988.  but  in  1990  many  of  these  littered  the 
windward  reefs  and  shores,  the  result  of  cyclonic  weather  in 
February  of  that  year.  Similarly,  in  1990,  considerably  thicker 
deposits  of  coarse  sand  had  overlain  the  rubbly  windward 
beaches  and  interislet  channels  of  1988. 

Alterations  to  Caroline's  beaches  provide  the  major  areas 
of  change  in  islet  shape.  The  main  areas  of  aggradation  are  on 
the  northwest  and  southwest  leeward  points  of  the 
windward  islets.  This  is  particularly  true  of  the  largerones  such 
as  Brothers  (which  has  joined  with  a  separate  islet 
mapped  by  Arundel ).  and  Windw  ard  and  Tridacna  ( which  have 
added  more  sediment  to  their  southwest  points  during  the  last 
century). 

Beachrock:  These  narrow,  elongated  strata  of  eroded 
upraised  reef,  brown  consolidated  sands,  and  reef  detritus  are 
not  abundant  on  Caroline.  Occurring  as  strips  at  the  low  water 
mark,  they  flank  the  windward  beaches  of  Nake,  Long,  and 
South  (Figs.  37.38.50;  PI.  58)  and  a  few  of  the  leeward  islets. 
They  become  more  exposed  alter  violent  storms.  Extensive 
areas  of  a  coarser  conglomerate  (PI.  21 )  hug  the  inner  reef  flats 
of  western  South  Island. 

Upraised  Reef:  In  a  lew  areas,  jagged,  eroded  upraised 
reef  {champignon  or  /<•<<)  is  evident — for  example,  the  lower 
quarter  of  Long.  A  thin  soil  cover  supports  a  forest  of  lower 
stature  than  would  otherwise  be  expected.  In  this  minikarst 
area  the  rocky  substrate  is  pitted  with  holes  of  varying  sizes  and 
undermined  with  subterranean  tunnels  in  which  at  least  two 
species  of  land  crabs  (Birgus  latro,  Cardisoma  spp. )  shelter 
( PI.  22).  Noddv  Rock  (PI.  1 9).  the  smallest  motu  (0.02  ha),  and 


11 


many  jagged  coralline  "mushrooms"  found  on  the  reel  Hats 
(PI.  11 ).  are  probably  remnants  of  former  reef  flats  formed 
when  sea  levels  were  several  feet  higher  than  present. 

Lagoon 

A  notable  attribute  of  Caroline's  lagoon  fromaconservation 
perspective  is  its  outstanding  clarity  and  beauty.  Throughout, 
but  especially  near  the  Central  Leeward  Islets,  the  twisted  reef 
configurations  studded  with  white  sandy  channels  and  deeper 
circular  openings  generate  a  spectrum  of  stunning  colors — 
turquoise,  apple  green,  tawny,  azure,  and  royal  blue  (PI.  25). 

Caroline's  lagoon.  8.9  km  long,  is  closed.  Though  it 
appears  to  dominate  the  atoll,  its  total  area  is  less  than  that  of 
the  combined  reef  flats.  The  lagoon  is  relatively  shallow, 
tapering  in  shape  and  depth  at  each  end,  and  is  crisscrossed  with 
living  coral.  Its  bathymetry  is  unknown. 

In  the  north  the  lagoon  is  more  sheltered,  as  the  presence 
of  continuous  vegetated  land  buffers  the  easterly  trades.  At  its 
northern  extremity,  merging  reef  flats  squeeze  the  lagoon  until 
it  disappears  east  of  Pandanus  Islet.  A  filled-in  portion  of  the 
former  lagoon  penetrates  Nake  for  300  m  as  a  fishhook-shaped 
mudflat,  Sandy  Inlet  (Fig.  37.  PI.  23).  before  succumbing  to 
encircling  vegetation.  At  the  lagoon's  southern  end,  where 
winds  whip  through  the  "blind  channel."  it  is  choppy,  having 
more  sediment  and  slightly  less  visibility.  However,  w  ithin  the 
lee  of  South  Island' s  north-central  curve,  the  lagoon  is  frequently 
quiet  and  reflective  (PI.  24). 

Lagoon  Hydrology:  Although  Caroline's  hydrology  has 
not  been  studied,  it  has  been  closely  observed  for  over  two 
years  by  Ron  Falconer,  especially  the  south  end  of  the  lagoon 
and  "blind  passage.'"  He  has  noticed  that  the  lagoon  water  is 
tv  pically  "perched"  at  a  level  above  that  of  all  but  the  daily  high 
tides.  High  tide  water  flows  rapidly  over  the  reef  flats  into  the 
lagoon  but  is  held  back  by  the  reefs  as  the  tide  lowers.  Ron  has 
noted  that  lagoon  water  at  low  tide  is  about  0.3  m  higher  than 
water  in  the  "blind  passage."  Water  moves  out  of  the  lagoon 
through  a  few  channels  that,  although  deep  in  places,  form 
broad,  shallow  troughs  over  the  reef  flats.  A  major  channel 
with  a  current  flowing  west  at  several  knots  passes  along  the 
northwest  point  of  South  Island,  although  water  passage  is 
impeded  hv  the  reel  flats  west  of  South  Island.  If  a  channel 
u  ere  to  he  blasted  through  the  reef  flats,  .is  has  been  proposed, 
this  delicate  hydrolog)  would  be  disrupted.  For  example,  the 
high  tide  w  ater  is  never  more  than  20  cm  above  the  coral  heads 
and  reels  m  the  lagoon.  A  man-made  reef  channel  for  vessels 
could  lower  water  levels  30-40  cm.  thereby  exposing  and 
killing  the  extensive  Acropora  Tridacna  reefs  within  the  lagoon. 

The  "blind  passage"  northeast  ol  South  Island  (Fig.  50)  is 
sustained  by  a  powerful  northward  How  of  water  along  the  east 
coast  of  South  Island  and  a  strong  southward  flow  of  water 
along  the  seaward  reels  of  Tridacna  Islet.  The  South  Island 
flow  is  apparently  augmented  bv  water  draining  from  a  large 
shallow  basin  on  the  reef  Hats  south  of  the  island.  Water  spills 
into  the  "blind  passage"  and  drams  east  at  about  4  knots  against 
(he  pre\  ailing  Hade  w  inds  and  surf.  There  is  much  less  current 
at  the  west  (inner)  end  of  the  passage,  where  less  water  is 
collected,  and  throughout  the  passage  at  low  tide  i  there  being 
essential!)  no  water  How  out  from  the  lagoon). 


Patch  Reefs:  A  complex  series  of  patch  reefs  and  coral 
knolls  ( primarily  Acropora  spp.  i.  circular  and  elongated,  flank 
the  smaller  motus  and  crisscross  most  of  the  lagoon's  area  (see 
Chapter  Frontispiece).  They  are  particularly  evident  in  the 
southern  two-thirds  of  the  lagoon,  where  they  approach  and/or 
break  the  surface.  Coral  limestone  bedrock,  surmounted  by  a 
variety  of  living  coral,  mollusks.  and  other  invertebrates, 
provides  their  basic  structure  (Fig.  10).  The  atoll's  perimeter 
reefs  shelter  the  knolls  from  storms,  surf,  and  excessive  erosion. 

Caroline's  lagoon  is  gradually  filling  in  with  ever- 
expanding  patch  reefs  and  debris  washed  in  from  the  fringing 
reefs.  Since  Arundel's  time,  the  effects  of  detrital  deposition 
can  be  discerned  as  changes  in  the  shapes  of  islets  such  as  Nake. 
Danger,  and  Arundel  (compare  Figs.  2  and  4 1. 

Such  change  is  typical  of  atoll  evolution.  Geologically. 
Caroline  is  a  few  steps  behind  one  of  its  "neighbor"  Line 
Islands,  Christmas,  where  sediments  and  coral  growth  have 
converted  the  original  lagoon  into  a  maze  of  supersaline. 
minilagoons  and  tiny  islets,  mostly  cut  off  from  the  sea.  Further 
steps  in  evolution  are  exemplified  by  completely  filled-in  atolls 
such  as  Jarvis  and  Vostok,  where  not  even  salty  pools  remain. 

Tridacna- Acropora  Reef:  Though  the  giant  clam 
(Tridacna  maxima)  is  an  abundant  component  of  Caroline's 
lagoonside  reefs,  exceptional  aggregations  flank  the  most 
southerly  windward  motus  (Brothers  through  Tridacna. 
Figs.  44  to  48 ).  Two  especially  outstanding  reefs  extend  across 
the  lagoon  from  Tridacna  to  Ana-Ana  (Fig.  10:  PI.  26)  and 
Tridacna  to  Kimoa  (Fig.  48).  where  Tridacna  are  attached  to 
Acropora  spp.  corals,  a  favored  substrate  (Braley.  1987). 
Abundant  inshore  Tridacna  on  all  these  islets  suggest  that  their 
density  is  similar  to  that  on  the  main  reef:  up  to  20/. 25  nr 
(i.e..  80/m2),  averaging  35/nv  for  the  entire  area  surveyed 
(Sirenko&  Koltun.  Subchapter  1. 4.  this  volume).  This  exceeds 
the  highest  densities  known:  up  to60/nv  at  Reao  Atoll.  Tuamotu 
Archipelago  ( Richard.  1985).  Densities  of  6-20/m2,  at  Takapoto 
Atoll  (Tuamotus)  are  considered  high.  Throughout  Caroline, 
the  clams  averaged  18  x  lOcminsize.  Several  species  of  giant 
clams  have  suffered  greatly  in  the  Indo-Paeific  from  poaching 
and  ov  erharv  esling:  few  undisturbed  populations  exist  ( Braley . 
1987).  Caroline  is  thus  a  special  refuge  for  T.  maxima. 

Lagoon  Reel  Flats:  These  varv  considerably  but  are 
narrower  and  more  gently  sloping  than  the  seaward  reef  flats. 
They  are  typically  covered  with  fine  coral  gravel  and  coarse 
sand  In  sheltered  areas  dower  Long.  Windward.  Crescent. 
South,  upper  end  of  lagoon),  lush  shrubbery — Cordia, 
Toiirnefortia,  Pisonia,  Cocos — overhangs  the  lagoon.  Here 
fine  silt.  sand,  and/or  an  algal  slime  are  common  (PI.  28).  In 
ll)88.  narrow,  sandy  beaches  occurred  only  on  the  north  shore 
of  South  (PI.  24)  and  east  side  of  Shark  (PI.  29).  but  in  1990, 
sand  was  more  common  throughout  Caroline. 

Where  the  lagoon  shorelines  arc  less  sheltered  and 
vegetation  does  not  overhang  the  lagoon,  unvegetated  rubble 
and  sparse  herb  mats  are  typical.  Here,  lagoonside  rubble 
av  erages  less  than  2  m  wide  ( PI.  3 1 ).  This  contrasts  with  their 
seaw aid  reef  Hats,  w Inch  av erage  2  1  m  w ide  (PI.  12). 

Lagoon  Reef  Fauna:  A  Brief  Summary :  Caroline's 
marine  environment  is  rich  vet  essentially  undocumented; 
know  ledge  of  its  ecosystems  is  limited  to  small,  outdated  lists 


12 


offish  and  invertebrates  (Dixon,  1884;  Fowler,  1901;  Pilsbry 
&Vanatta.  1905a.b).  However,  preliminary  studies  on  mollusks, 
benthic  invertebrates,  and  lagoon  plankton  were  begun  by 
Soviet  scientists  in  1988  (Tsyban  &  Smith,  1988;  Sirenko  & 
Koltun.  Subchapter  1.4.  this  volume).  The  lagoon  and  reefs  are 
remarkably  pristine,  having  changed  little  since  their  first 
discovery;  all  early  travelers  remarked  on  their  beauty, 
abundance,  and  variety  (Bennett,  1840;  Markham,  1904). 

The  usual  assemblage  of  tropical  invertebrates — 
echinoderms.  mollusks,  crustaceans,  porifera,  corals,  tunicates, 
et  cetera — are  present.  Large  numbers  of  black  sea  cucumbers 
(PI.  10).  about  20  cm  long,  are  particularly  abundant  on  the 
lagoon  reef  flats  of  the  southern  windward  islands.  They  have 
been  tentatively  identified  as  Ludwigothuria  sp.  (B.  Sirenko, 
personal  communication).  Conspicuous  fish  families  include 
paiTot  fish  (Scaridae),  butterfly  fish  (Chaetodontidae), 
surgeonfish  (Acanthuridae),  damselfish  (Pomacentridae), 
pufferfish  (Tetraodontidae).  and  wrasses  (Labridae). 

Substrata 

Throughout  the  atoll,  the  substrata  reflect  a  coralline 
origin.  There  is  little  "soil"  in  the  accepted  sense.  Various 
grades  of  jagged,  eroded  coral  and  mollusean  rubble  (from  fist- 
sized  to  tiny  pebbles),  together  with  sand,  coralline  algae,  and 
small  proportions  of  organic  litter,  humus,  and  guano,  are 
present.  Such  accumulations  of  reef  and  terrestrial  debris  are 
similar  to  those  of  other  low,  coral  atolls  (  Fosberg,  1953; 
Stone.  1953:  Wiens,  1962;  Niering.  1963;  Stoddart  &  Sachet. 
1969;  Reese,  1987;  Garnett,  1983). 

Generally  speaking,  atoll  soils  are  calcareous  and  extremely 
immature,  a  consequence  of  their  limited  age  and  frequent 
disturbance  by  storms.  Barely  modified  beyond  the  reef  that 
spawned  their  presence,  they  are  composed  primarily  of  calcium 
and  magnesium  carbonates.  Water  retention,  if  any,  is  due  to 
accumulated  organic  matter  and  its  associated  chemical  changes. 
This  is  particularly  important  with  respect  to  guano,  which 
reacts  with  coral  sand  and  humus  to  form  phosphatic  hardpan 
and  nitrogen-rich  "soils"  (Fosberg.  1953). 

Reese  (1987)  categorizes  atoll  "soils"  into  five  types,  all  of 
which  occur,  in  different  proportions,  at  Caroline.  The  degree 
of  organic  matter,  decomposition,  amount  of  humus,  and  the 
depth  of  the  "soil"  strata  are  directly  correlated  with  age  and 
size  of  the  motus. 

/.  Accumulations  of  coral  rubble,  mainly  of  stone  size. 
These  youngest  of  "soils"  are  most  evident  around  the  edges  of 
the  motus.  acting  as  a  substrate  for  pioneer  herb  mats.  Often 
extending  well  inland,  they  can  support  surprisingly  lush 
Tournefortia  scrub. 

2.  Unaltered  coral  sand  and  gravel.  Although  exposed 
sand  was  uncommon  at  Caroline  in  1 988,  this  substrate  occurred 
intertidally  where  the  lagoon  was  filling  in  and  on  actively 
growing  sandbars,  primarily  in  the  upper  lagoon  (Pis.  23,28), 
northeast  and  northwest  South  (Pis.  24,32),  and  the  lagoon  ward 
edge  of  Shark  (PI.  29).  In  1990,  sand  was  more  ubiquitous  on 
Caroline  as  a  result  of  the  deposition  of  tons  of  sand  during  the 
severe  February  storm. 

3.  Soils  with  a  weakly  developed  A-horizon,  with  color 
i  mly  slightly  darker  than  the  unaltered  sand  below,  but  with  no 


evidence  of  structural  development.  Especially  evident  in 
1988  within  the  ancient  interislet  channels  that  compose  Long 
Island  (PI.  33),  much  of  this  substrate  is  now  storm-eroded  and 
overlain  by  fresh  sand. 

4.  Soils  with  a  more  developed  A-horizon.  deeper  and 
darker  than  above,  with  some  structural  development.  This 
stage  defines  areas  where  the  rubbly/sandy  substrate  approaches 
a  true,  but  poor,  "soil."  As  such,  it  represents  older,  more  stable 
parts  of  each  island.  It  is  common  within  the  islet  interiors 
where  Pisonia  is  (or  was)  present.  Humus  and  guano  fill  the 
gaps  within  the  irregular  shapes  of  eroded  coral.  Its  composition 
may  be  likened  to  a  coarse  mixture  of  gravel,  sand,  bones,  and 
shells,  all  mixed  with  sparse  amounts  of  partly-decomposed 
litter.  Land  crabs  are  particularly  numerous,  helping  break 
down  organic  matter  into  finer  particles. 

5.  Soils  with  an  accumulation  of  raw  humus  on  the  surface 
and  with  a  relatively  deep  A-horizon.  During  this  stage 
phosphatic  hardpan  may  develop.  These  true  soils,  though 
somewhat  depleted  by  guano  diggers,  cover  significant  areas 
on  South  and  Nake.  Cocos  and/or  Pisonia  debris  adds  greatly 
to  their  dark  color  and  moisture  content.  This  earthy  substrate 
is  composed  primarily  of  rotting  Cocos  fronds  and  fibers  that 
have  been  shredded  by  coconut  crabs.  Patches  of  blackish 
muck  on  South  Island  support  local  patches  of  Polynesian 
arrowroot  (Tacca  leontopetaloides). 

On  Caroline,  hardpan  (PI.  76)  was  present  in  several  areas 
(primarily  South,  Nake,  Long,  Emerald,  and  Mannikiba), 
supporting  herb  mats  and  Tournefortia  scrub.  This  substrate 
may  be  likened  to  an  old  asphalt  road. 

Caroline  provides  an  excellent  example  of  the  progression 
of  soil  development  through  islets  of  different  age  and  size 
classes  (see  Ecological  Succession  section).  From  a  wave- 
washed  mound  of  coral  rubble,  barely  above  sea  level  (Fig.  5), 
the  substrate  gradually  improves  in  texture  and  fertility  as  the 
emerging  islet  ages  and  organic  matter  accumulates.  Pioneer 
plants  are  hardy,  salt-tolerant,  low-lying  mats  consisting 
primarily  of  Heliotropium,  and  later,  Tournefortia.  Increasing 
numbers  of  shrubs  provide  shade  and  branches  for  nesting 
seabirds.  Larger  trees  (Pisonia.  Cordia,  Morinda)  add  more 
shade  and  thereby  increase  humidity,  as  well  as  provide 
opportunities  for  additional  organic  "fallout":  leaves  and  bird 
remains  (nests,  eggs,  chicks,  droppings,  regurgitated  food, 
dead  adults). 

Each  stage  of  substrate  development  accelerates  the 
accumulation  of  organic  material  and  helps  to  define  an 
emerging,  deeper  A-horizon.  Soil  maturity  is  indicated  by 
more  organic  matter,  improved  soil  texture,  and  a  lowered 
volume  of  coralline  and  mollusean  debris.  Caroline's  soils 
barely  exceed  several  centimeters  in  depth  and  are  always 
intermingled  with  coral  fragments.  As  a  result,  they  are 
unsuitable  for  burrowing  seabirds,  such  as  petrels  and 
shearwaters. 

Hydrology 

Hydrological  information  is  essentially  lacking.  No 
standing  fresh  water  exists.  The  quality,  extent,  and  salinity  of 
the  freshwater  lenses,  as  well  as  their  variability  according  to 
tide,  season,  and  rainfall,  are  unknown.  At  the  time  of  Caroline's 


13 


discovery"  ( 1606),  de  Quiros  and  his  party  were  desperate  for 
fresh  water.  After  noting  how  lush  and  green  Caroline  was, 
they  expected  to  find  good  water  supplies,  but  there  was 
"nothing  but  salt  water  in  the  holes  they  dug"  (Markham, 
1904).  Maude  ( 1968)  suggested,  in  retrospect,  that  had  they 
waited  longer  the  salt  water  in  their  shallow  wells  might  have 
run  fresh,  as  has  been  his  experience  on  some  other  atolls. 
During  the  19th  century,  three  wells  were  used — one  on  Nake 
and  two  on  South  (Holden  &  Qualtrough,  1884).  One  South 
Island  well  contained  fresh  water  at  1.5  m  depth  in  1974 
(Garnett.  1983).  We  saw  no  wells  but  located  concrete  cisterns, 
one  built  near  the  northwest  point  of  South  in  1937  and  rebuilt 
by  the  Falconers  in  1989.  and  another  uncovered  one  (dating 
from  1938)  within  a  Cocos—Pisonia  grove  along  Tr.  2,  about 
200  in  east  of  the  southwest  corner  of  Nake. 

Caroline's  paucity  of  fresh  water  may  be  partly  responsible 
for  the  lack  of  a  permanent  population.  The  annual  rainfall  in 
1989  (Appendix  2)  was  1,242  mm  (48.9").  However,  like  the 
similarly  lush  Nikumaroro  and  Orona  (Phoenix  Islands), 
Caroline's  rainfall  may  vary  greatly  from  yearto  year,  resulting 
in  undependable  water  supplies.  In  the  past,  residents  relied  on 
rainfall  catchment  for  fresh  water  (Maude,  ca.  1938;  R.  Falconer, 
personal  communication). 

Shallow  sources  of  fresh  or  brackish  water  may  be  present 
on  most  islets,  as  Pisonia  forests  occur  on  14%  of  them,  but 
very  little  is  known  of  freshwater  lenses  supporting  Pisonia 
forests  (Wiens,  1962).  If  we  assume  that  Pisonia  is  not  salt- 
tolerant,  small  water  lenses  may  be  present  on  motus  as  small 
as  0.2  ha.  This  is  further  discussed  in  the  Ecological  Succession 
section. 

Climate 

Meteorological  records  for  Caroline  were  sparse  until 
1989,  when  Ron  Falconer  began  daily  records  of  rainfall  and 
wind  direction  (Appendix  2).  Some  data  is  available  from  the 
plantation  years  1916-1920  (Young,  ca.  1922)  and  during  the 
1883  Solar  Eclipse  Expedition  (20  April-8  May)  (Upton. 
1884),  when  203.2  mm  (8")  fell.  The  best  generalizations  on 
weather  conditions  in  this  area  are  found  in  the  Geographical 
Handbook  Series:  Pacific  Islands,  Volume  2  (N.I.D..  1943). 
Wiens  (1962),  Seelye  (1950),  Taylor  (1973),  and  various 
papers  on  the  Tuamotus  (Stoddart  &  Sachet,  1969;  Sachet, 
1983).  Islands  in  the  Line  Group  experience  a  wide  range  of 
climates.  In  general,  those  near  the  equator  are  dry,  with 
rainfall  increasing  with  increasing  latitude  north  or  south. 

Caroline  experiences  a  tropical  oceanic  climate  that  varies 
little  during  the  year.  Temperatures  are  uniformly  warm  to  hot, 
normally  tempered  by  trade  winds  from  the  southeast  to 
northeast.  Falconer  (personal  communication)  has  recorded  an 
annual  average  of  30°C  (86°F)  (range  26-3PC  [78-88°F|). 
Mean  annual  temperatures  for  the  Central  Equatorial  Islands 
lie  between  24  and  29  C  (75-85°F).  Surface  temperatures 
increase  rapidly  in  early  morning  and  remain  hot  throughout 
the  day.  forest  interiors  are  humid.  The  daily  range  of 
temperatures  exceeds  the  annual  fluctuation  in  the  daily  mean. 

Atmospheric  pressure,  sunshine,  and  cloud  cover  are 
probably  similar  lo  the  northern  Tuamotus — uniform  except 


during  storms.  During  our  1 988  surveys  the  sky  and  air  were 
extremely  clear,  but  we  experienced  much  heavy  cloud  and 
rain  in  March  1 990,  the  aftermath  of  cyclones  "Peni"  (centered 
near  Vostok)  and  "Ofu"  (centered  further  west). 

Wind  and  Rainfall:  Caroline  is  dominated  by  trade  winds. 
As  on  all  low  atolls,  land  topography  has  no  appreciable  effect 
on  weather.  Although  it  lies  within  an  area  primarily  influenced 
by  southeast  trades,  there  is  a  small  annual  oscillatory  movement 
northward  and  southward,  so  that  in  reality  winds  blow  from 
the  east,  northeast,  and  southeast.  This  accounts  for  the  east 
and  northeast  winds  that  puzzled  the  eclipse  party,  who  were 
expecting  winds  from  the  southeast  (Upton.  1884).  Data  from 
Falconer  (Appendix  2)  indicates  that,  at  least  for  1989  and 
1990,  winds  blow  primarily  from  the  north  and  northeast,  and 
rarely  from  the  southeast  (April-August). 

The  atoll  lies  within  a  belt  of  variable  rainfall,  along  with 
Vostok,  Flint,  and  the  northern  Tuamotus.  Young  (ca.  1922, 
p.  13)  notes  that  Caroline's  rainfall  is  "certainly  less  than  that 
of  Flint,"  giving  exact  figures  for  1919  (2,172  mm)  and  1920 
( 1.854  mm)  and  estimates  that  there  was  "probably  not  more 
than  50"  (1270  mm)"  during  1916.  1917.  and  1919.  These 
estimates  were  based  on  exact  figures  from  Flint  ( 1 .600.  1 .346, 
1,295  mm,  respectively).  Falconer  measured  1.242.1  mm 
(48.9")  in  1989  and  2,209.8  mm  (87")  in  1990.  An  unusually 
stormy  February  in  1990  brought  640  mm  (25.2")  of  rain. 
Rainfall  distribution  isohyets  (Taylor.  1973)  assign  Caroline 
an  annual  precipitation  of  approximately  1,500  mm  (60"),  a 
perfect  average  ofthe  above  6  years  (x=  1,513mm).  Ingeneral, 
"winter"  (May-October)  corresponds  roughly  to  a  dry  season 
and  "summer"  (November-April)  to  a  wet  season. 

Hurricanes  and  Tsunamis:  Atoll  islets  are  active  structures, 
undergoing  repeated  death  and  rebirth.  Violent  storms  contribute 
to  ongoing  erosional  and  rebuilding  processes.  Storms  deposit 
debris  not  only  along  the  shores  of  the  windward  islets 
(Pis.  17,20)  and  across  reef  flats  into  the  lagoon  but  sweeps  it 
far  inland. 

Although  the  south-central  Pacific  is  relatively  free  of 
cyclonic  storms  (cyclones,  typhoons,  hurricanes),  they  do 
occur  with  enough  frequency  and  devastating  force  that  any 
discussion  on  climate  should  include  them.  Although  detailed 
records  of  hurricanes  and  tropical  storms  exist  for  the  inhabited 
Tuamotus  since  European  discovery,  many  of  these  may  not 
have  affected  Caroline.  However,  the  following  evidence 
suggests  that  Caroline  experienced  two  major  hurricanes  last 
century  and  that  periodic  violent  storms  can  modify  the  atoll 
substantially: 

/.  Between  IH22  and  1825.  When  de  Quiros  visited 
Caroline  in  1 606.  the  northwesterly  Cocos  plantation  on  South 
Island  was  healthy.  When  Bennett  arrived  in  1834.  he  noted 
that  all  the  palms  were  "of  dwarf  stature."  and  that  "amidst  the 
original  groves,  the  number  of  vigorous  seedlings  fully 
confirmed  Captain  Stavers'  statement  [who  had  visited  the 
atoll  in  1828]  that  these  palms  had  increased  greatlv  since  his 
last  visit  to  the  spot"  (Bennett.  1840). 

A  few  years  before  1 828.  therefore,  something  had  affected 
the  palms.  By  1834  they  were  all  of  an  even  height  and  quite 
short,  vet  bore  nuts.  French  records  indicate  that  two  devastating 


14 


storms  whipped  through  the  Tuamotus  during  this  time — in 
1 822  and  1 825  (Sachet,  1 983 ).  At  least  one  of  these  could  have 
affected  Caroline. 

2.  The  1878  cyclone.  The  first  unambiguous  record  of 
major  devastation  at  Caroline  comes  from  the  letter  of  a  certain 
J.  M.  Salmon,  dated  1883  and  reproduced  in  Holden  (1884). 
Speaking  of  the  time  when  Messrs.  Brown  and  Brothers  took 
possession  of  Caroline  (somewhere  between  1865  and  1872). 
he  stated  that  "it  seemed  as  if  there  had  been  a  storm  or 
hurricane  at  some  short  period  previous,  which  had  desolated 
the  place."  Arundel  ( 1 890)  attributed  this  to  a  tidal  wave  that 
swept  across  the  Pacific  from  South  America  to  New  Zealand 
and  Australia  in  1868  (Arundel,  1890).  but  atolls  do  not 
generally  suffer  greatly  from  tsunamis  because  they  lack 
focusing  relief.  Hydrographer  of  the  Navy  (1931.  Vol.  Ill, 
p.  154),  however,  referring  to  Caroline,  clearly  states  that  in 
"  1 878  a  cyclone  passed  over  the  islands,  destroying  most  of  the 
coconut  trees." 

The  Great  Britain  Naval  Intelligence  Division  (N.I.D.. 
1 943.  p.  490).  in  reference  to  Caroline,  also  states  that  "in  1 878 
a  hurricane  wrought  g-eat  destruction."  This  was  possibly  the 
storm  of  6-7  February  1878.  an  extremely  violent  one  which 
killed  I  17  persons  on  Kaukura  Atoll.  750  km  southeast  of 
Caroline  in  the  Tuamotus  (Sachet.  1983). 

3.  The  1990  storms.  We  know  from  Arundel's  chart 
( Fig.  4)  that  no  major  islet-altering  storm  has  hit  Caroline  Atoll 
since  1883.  However. oursecondvisittoCarolinewas2 weeks 
after  cyclone  "Peni,"  centered  near  Vostok  (February  1990). 
affected  the  atoll.  Violent  winds,  torrential  rain,  and  high  seas 
had  uprooted  vegetation  in  some  windward  areas  and  greatly 
altered  Caroline's  shorelines,  interislet  channels,  tidal  fans. 
and  incipient  islets  from  our  1988  visit.  Sand  and  rubble  had 
been  rearranged  on  both  windward  and  leeward  islets,  Motu 
Atibu  virtually  disappeared,  and  the  main  interislet  channel 
that  divides  Long  Island  had  lost  its  herb  mats  and  many 
Tournefortia  shrubs,  becoming  smothered  with  fresh  sand. 

Because  islets  on  coral  atolls  rarely  exceed  5  m  in  elevation, 
the  tidal  surges  associated  with  Class  IV  orClass  V  hurricanes. 
often  exceeding  5  m  in  depth,  can  overwhelm  them,  not  only 
altering  or  destroying  the  vegetation,  but  in  extreme  cases 
completely  removing  them  from  the  coral  rim  (Frisbie,  1944). 
It  is  essential  to  consider  the  ephemeral  nature  of  Caroline's 
islets  in  the  discussions  that  follow. 

Sea  Conditions:  Because  the  most  extensive  coral  rubble 
deposits  occur  around  northern  Nake  and  southern  South 
Island,  and  because  the  Cocos  plantation  of  northwest  South 
was  so  badly  hit  by  storms  last  century,  the  following  Tuamotuan 
generalities  (Newell.  1956)  probably  also  apply  to  Caroline: 
/.  prevailing  trade  winds  from  the  east  give  heavy  seas  on 
the  northeast  or  windward  side; 

2.  southern  ocean  swells  generated  in  the  sub-Antarctic 
break  heavily  on  the  south  or  seaward  side;  and 

3.  occasional  hurricanes  or  tropical  storms  strike  in  the 
northwest  or  stormward  quarter. 


Vegetation:  Vascular  Plants  and  Floristics 

Botanical  History 

All  early  visitors  to  Caroline  described  a  well  wooded  atoll 
with  numerous  islets  whose  vegetation  extended  to  the  shoreline. 
It  has  changed  little  in  the  384  years  since  its  Western  discovery. 
The  first  botanical  collection  and  notes  were  those  of  Bennett 
in  1835  (Bennett.  1840),  who  recorded  10  flowering  plants  and 
a  fern  and  planted  Tahitian  chestnut,  sweet  potato,  and 
Polynesian  arrowroot.  The  location  of  his  plant  collection,  if 
it  still  exists,  is  unknown  (Clapp  &  Sibley.  1971a).  Evidently 
only  a  single  nonnative  species  (Cocos),  surviving  as  two  small 
groves,  persisted  until  the  late  19th  century.  Beginning  in 
1885.  coconuts  were  planted  extensively  on  South  Island  and 
south  Nake.  but  the  copra  industry  failed  twice,  and  from  1929 
to  1987  the  atoll  was  essentially  uninhabited. 

Dixon  made  the  first  true  botanical  collection  in  1883 
during  the  Solar  Eclipse  Expedition  (in  Trelease,  1884).  All 
specimens  were  from  South  Island  except  Laponea  ruderalis. 
His  collection  included  several  ornamentals  and  vegetables 
that  have  not  been  reported  since,  an  important  point  as  these 
temporary  introductions  have  since  been  cited  in  the  literature 
as  part  of  Caroline's  35  plant  species.  Many  were  not  found  by 
the  POBSP  party,  yet  because  no  scientific  investigations  had 
been  conducted  for  80  years,  they  were  counted  as  part  of  the 
atoll  flora  (Clapp  &  Sibley.  1971a).  Three  more  visits  to 
Caroline,  plus  periodic  searching  by  the  Falconers,  have  also 
failed  to  uncover  most  of  these  ornamentals.  Since  Caroline's 
occasional  occupants  tended  gardens  (Lucett,  1851),  it  is 
evident  that  many  introduced  plants  have  died  out,  lacking 
constant  care. 

Vascular  Plants  of  Caroline  Atoll 

Plant  Collections:  To  avoid  duplicating  Long's  plant 
collection  (Clapp  &  Sibley.  1971a).  we  collected  only 
5  specimens  in  1988  and  33  in  1990.  Dr.  D.  Herbst  assisted 
with  identification,  prepared  and  deposited  the  specimens  with 
Long's  in  the  Bernice  P.  Bishop  Museum.  Honolulu.  Hawaii, 
with  duplicates  in  the  U.S.  National  Museum.  Washington. 
D.C.  Collection  numbers  preceded  by  'K'  were  collected  by 
A.  Kay  Kepler;  those  preceded  by  'L'  are  those  of  the  late 
C.  R.  Long.  Earlier  collections  of  Bennett  in  1835  (Bennett. 
1 840)  and  Dixon  in  1 883  ( in  Trelease.  1 884)  are  noted  by  date 
only. 

Working  with  Long's  location  records  for  some  species 
has  proven  difficult.  He  was  working  with  an  incorrect  map 
(Fig.  7).  which  showed  only  25  islets  instead  of  39.  Much  of 
his  work  was  done  at  night,  which  in  some  places  would  have 
made  it  hard  for  him  to  determine  his  exact  location.  His 
references  to  South,  Long,  and  Nake  are  undoubtedly  correct, 
and  presumably  the  following:  "second  islet  south  of  Long"  = 
Crescent;  "islet  northeast  of  South  Island"  =  Tridacna:  and 
"fourth  islet  north  of  Bird  Islet"  =  Emerald.  Long  records 
Pandanus  on  the  "second  islet  south  of  Nake  Island."  which 


15 


lacked  Pandanus  when  we  surveyed  the  island.  Moreover,  the 
first  islet  south  of  Nake  supports  an  extensive  grove  of  large 
Pandanus  trees  on  its  eastern  (lagoon)  shore,  and  we  feel 
confident  in  ascribing  Long's  specimen  to  this  island,  which 
we  had  named  "Pandanus"  because  of  this  grove.  To  be 
consistent,  we  have  ascribed  all  his  other  "second  islet" 
specimens  to  Pandanus  Islet  as  well  and  assume  he  made  no 
collections  on  the  actual  second  islet  (Danger). 

Species  Lists.  Annotated  Checklist,  and  Maps  of  Terrestrial 
Vascular  Plants:  Following  recent  authors  Sachet  &  Fosberg, 
19S3;Lamberson,  1987),  we  do  not  considerCaroline's  transient 
or  extinct  vascular  flora  (Table  1)  or  the  vegetables  and 
ornamentals  in  the  Falconer's  garden  as  part  of  Caroline's 
viable  flora.  Table  2  summarizes  the  current  flora,  detailing  the 
relative  abundance  of  each  species  within  each  plant  community . 
These  tables  are  based  on  sight  records  supplemented  by  all 
collections,  past  and  present.  No  beach  drift  seeds  are  known 
from  Caroline  apart  from  those  species  already  represented. 
English  and  Gilbertese  names  in  Tables  1  and  2  are  from 
Thaman  ( 1987),  St.  John  (1973).  and  Perry  &  Garnett  (n.d.). 
If  no  common  name  is  available,  the  Hawaiian  name,  familiar 
to  many  students  of  Pacific  botany,  is  used. 

One  new  species  record  for  the  atoll,  as  yet  unidentified,  is 
called  Species  A  (K-90-23.  24):  a  single  sterile  shrub  2.5  in 
high,  collected  from  southwest  Motu  Mannikiba  in  coarse 
strand  rubble,  is  similarto  Clerodendrum  inerme,  with  leathery 
leaves  and  arching  stems  4-5  m  long.  It  was  found  by  John 
Phillips. 

Table  3  lists  the  distribution  and  abundance  of  plant 
species  ( with  subdivisions  into  tree,  shrub,  and  herb  components) 
onallmotus.  Figures  1 1-25  map  the  entire  atoll  distribution  of 
each  species  according  to  data  from  transects  and  aerial  maps. 
Families  are  arranged  phylogenetically.  according  to 
losherg  &  Sachet  ( 1 987 ).  with  species  arranged  alphabetically 
within  each  family.  The  taxonomy  of  vascular  plants  follows 
W.  Wagner etal.  ( 1990).  and  ferns  follow  H.  Wagner  (personal 
communication).  "'<  cover"  means  the  percentage  of  the 
ground  area  covered  by  a  particular  plant  species.  In  all  text  and 
tables,  the  following  symbols  apply: 
New  record  for  Caroline 

Indigenous — plants  native  to  Caroline  but  also  occurring 
elsewhere  (I) 

Aboriginal   introduction — useful   plants  brought  by 

Polynesians  in  pre-historical  times  (AI) 

#      Recent  introduction — plants  of  accidental  or  deliberate 

introduction  alter  Western  discovery  of  the  atoll  (Rl) 

A     Abundant — generally  the  major  or  dominant  species  in 

a  given  area 
VC  Very  common — often  seen  but  not  quite  as  abundantly 

as  above 
C     Common — generally  distributed  throughout  a  given 

area  in  large  numbers 
UC  Uncommon — observed  uncommonly  but  more  than  10 

times  in  a  given  area 
0     Occasional — here  and  there,  often  widely  scattered  but 

not  forming  a  major  component  of  the  vegetation 
R      Rare — observed  2    10  times  in  a  given  area 
S      Single — only  one  specimen  observed 


L      Local — found  only  or  principally  in  one  or  more  restricted 

areas 
D     Drift  seedling — plant  derived  from  a  water-borne  seed 
+      Not  seen  1988-1990  but  probably  still  present 

PSILOTACEAE 

*  Psilotum  nudum  (L.)  Beauv  (Fig.  1 1 ) 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  L-3233  from  Nake 
Present  Distribution:  Cosmopolitan,  common  on  remote 
islands,  rare  on  Caroline.  K-90-15  from  South.  In  1965. 
common  on  wet  base  of  Cocos  only  on  Nake  Island.  In  1988 
and  1990.  a  few  clumps  found  similarly  on  South  Island  in 
shady,  damp  locations,  close  to  lagoon,  northwest  sector. 
Cocos  canopy  was  18  m. 

POLYPODIACEAE 

*  Phymatosorus  scolopendria  (Burm.  /)  Pichi-Sermolli 
(Fig.  12:  PI.  34) 

Phymatodes  scolopendria  (Burm./)  Ching 

Polypodium  phymatodes  L. 

Polypodium  scolopendrium  Burm./. 

Microsorium  scolopendria  (Burm.)  Pichi-Sermolli 
Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Recorded  1840.  collected 
1884;  L-3244,  L-3250,  L-3287  from  Nake,  Long,  and  South 
Islands. 

Present  Distribution:  Range  extension  from  3  to  1  1  motus. 
Rarely  a  continuous  ground  cover,  usually  locally  rare  to 
abundant.  Commonest  on  Nake.  with  cover  10-80%.  Well 
represented  on  South,  especially  in  open  areas  of  the  interior, 
where  soils  are  moister.  On  other  motus  local  distribution 
varied  from  less  than  1  to  80%;  accurate  mapping  is  difficult. 
Absent  from  motus  less  than  0.6  ha  in  size,  where  habitats 
cannot  provide  cover,  moisture,  and  substrate  for  both 
sporophyte  and  gametophyte  generations. 

Ecology:  Hardy.  Leaves  burn  in  sun  but  can  withstand 
very  dry  conditions.  Primarily  in  Toumefortia  scrub,  mixed 
forests  with  Pisonia  and  Pandanus.  or  Cocos  plantations. 
Associated  with  Cordia,  Morinda,  Suriana.  In  open  clearings 
within  dying  Cocos  forests,  occurs  in  dense  mats  intermingled 
with  Boerhavia,  Ipomoea,  and  Portulaca.  Sometimes  gathers 
in  thick  bands  at  the  interface  of  Toumefortia  and  Pisonia 
forests.  Prefers  shelter,  high  humidity,  "soil."  and  relative  lack 
of  wind,  but  absent  from  deeply  shaded  forests.  Rhizomes 
never  exposed  on  ground  surface  or  epiphytic  on  trunks,  as  in 
wetter  islands  such  as  Hawaii  or  Samoa  (personal  observation) 
or  m  the  moister  Line  Islands  (Wester.  1985).  indicating  that 
Caroline's  habitats  are  suboptimal.  Although  most  ferns  are 
not  halophytic,  tins  species  grew  (rather  stunted)  in  ll>NN 
amongst  sparse  herb  mats  ( 1%  cover)  on  older  beach  sands  of 
an  ancient  reef  channel  on  Long  Island  (Tr.  C).  where  rainfall 
pi  ov  ides  the  sole  fresh  water,  but  was  ( temporarily?) obliterated 
in  February  1990.  Rare  to  uncommon  in  outer  beach  strand, 
and  beach  scrub  w  ith  Suriana  on  South,  Arundel,  and  Shark. 
Substrata:  Dry  coral  rubble,  sand  and  gravel,  rubble  with 
sparse  humus,  lagoon  mud,  relatively  fertile  humus,  older 
beach  sands. 


PANDANACEAE 

*  **?  Pandanus  tectorius  Park.  (Fig.  11;  Pis.  35-38,50) 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Recorded  1840, 
unidentified  Pandanus;  L-3227,  Pandanus  Islet,  seen  on  Nake 
by  Long. 

Present  Distribution:  A  minor  plant  community  ( Plant  and 
Communities  section),  Pandanus  is  primarily  associated  with 
Tournefortia  or  Pisonia  on  the  leeward  motus.  Most  common 
on  Nake.  with  Cocos  and  Ipomoea.  Range  extension  from  two 
to  seven  motus. 

Phenology:  Flowers  and  fruit  in  October,  March,  and 
May. 

Substrata:  Variable.  Prefers  lagoon  mud,  pure  sand,  and 
rubble-humus,  but  survives  in  almost  pure  rubble. 

GRAMINAE 

*  +?  Digitaria  species 

Collected  1883  and  recorded  as  IPanicum  (Digitaria) 
marginata.  Examined  by  Long,  who  believes  it  a  Digitaria 
identical  to  his  L-3235.  Not  found  by  the  authors. 

*  Lepturus  repens  (Forst.  f.)  R.  Br.  (Fig.  13;  PI.  2a) 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Collected  1883;  L-3211, 
322 1 .  3236, 3238, 3247, 3259, 3286  from  Windward,  Tridacna. 
Nake,  Long,  Emerald,  Crab,  and  South  Islands,  respectively. 

Present  Distribution:  On  most  dry  Pacific  atolls.  K-88-4, 
5 ;  K-90- 1 ,  2,  1 9  to  2 1, 25  from  South,  Tridacna,  and  Ana- Ana. 
On  Caroline,  range  extension  from  6  to  26  motus. 

Ecology:  Patchy,  rare  to  locally  common.  Usually  in 
exposed  herb  mats  with  Heliotropium,  Laportea,  Portulaca, 
and  low  Tournefortia  scrub.  Abundance  1-5%  cover  where 
not  in  thick  patches.  Occasionally  inland  under  Tournefortia, 
Cordia,  or  Cocos,  fitting  the  generalization  that  Lepturus, 
though  a  pioneer,  will  often  persist  as  undergrowth  in  forests. 
Tufts  tiny  (few  centimeters),  dry  and  scrappy  in  exposed  areas, 
but  to  3  dm  where  shaded.  Never  in  tall,  upright  clumps,  or  with 
the  same  abundance  as  on  the  drier,  filled-in  equatorial  atolls  or 
islands  with  sandier  habitats  (Christopherson.  1927;  Fosberg, 
1953,  personal  observation).  Never  forms  a  turf. 

Substrata:  Able  to  survive  in  coral  rubble  of  varying 
coarseness,  down  to  high  water  mark,  but  preferred  habitat  is 
part  sand.  L-3286  was  from  "numerous  clumps  under  Suriana 
scrub  on  South  Island,"  perhaps  the  low,  sandy  portion  of  the 
northwest  point  ( PI.  45 ).  our  best  Lepturus  site.  Comparison  of 
Arundel's  chart  (1883),  recent  aerial  surveys,  and  earlier 
photographs  indicate  that  several  motus  have  altered  shape 
since  1883.  The  amount  of  open  area  on  South  Island  has  also 
decreased  markedly  since  1883.  The  distribution  of  Lepturus 
parallels  these  changes;  there  is  clearly  much  less  on  South 
Island,  and  more  in  newly-created  islet  fringes. 

Since  1965  the  lagoon  shore  of  South  Island  has  become 
overgrown  by  Cocos,  so  much  that  both  Suriana  and  Lepturus 
are  much  less  common  than  previously  (Pis.  39,40).  However, 
sand  and  debris  will  always  be  shifting,  so  that  Lepturus  will 
move  from  place  to  place,  establishing  wherever  conditions 
permit.  In  the  second  situation,  a  comparison  of  Pis.  2a  and  24 


from  1 883  and  1988,  respectively,  shows  that  a  century  ago  the 
lagoon-facing  shores  of  South  Island  were  far  more  open  than 
the  dense  Cocos  plantations  of  today.  The  clumped  grass  in  the 
foreground  of  PI.  2a  is  undoubtedly  Lepturus,  probably  mixed 
with  introduced  grasses  not  seen  since  that  time  (Eleusine 
indica,  Eragrostis  plumosa)  and  the  dubious  Digitaria  sp., 
above. 

PALMAE 

**# Cocos nuciferaL.  (Figs.  14,36,51; Pis. 2,6,18,24,34,37,44) 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Recorded  1840,  1884; 
L-3285  from  South  Island,  extensive  groves  on  South  and 
Nake,  scattered  on  north  portion  of  Long. 

Present  Distribution;  Range  extension  from  3  to  1 5  motus. 
Planted  groves  on  South,  Nake,  and  Long;  the  rest  derived  from 
drift. 

Phenology:  Flowers  and  fruit  year  round. 

Ecology:  Forms  a  major  vegetation  type  (Plant 
Communities  section).  Primarily  South  and  Nake,  where 
closed  canopy  forests  average  2 1  m  high. 

TACCACEAE 

#  **?  Tacca  leontopetaloides  (L.)  O.  Kuntze  (Fig.  1 1 ) 

Tacca  pinnatifida  Forster 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Normally  an  aboriginal 
introduction  on  Pacific  islands,  but  on  Caroline  is  first  mentioned 
as  planted  in  1834  (Bennett.  1840);  L-3213  and  3219,  and 
K-90-7  and  90-16  from  moist  muck,  South  Island.  L-3234, 
common  under  Cocos  and  numerous  patches  found  in  muck, 
south  end,  Nake. 

Present  Distribution:  Common  in  northwest  South.  None 
in  flower;  each  plant  had  two  to  three  leaves,  possibly  dying 
back.  None  found  on  Nake,  despite  searching  the  south  end. 
Has  large  underground  tubers,  dies  back,  and  though  cultivated, 
still  occurs  spontaneously  in  Cocos  groves  on  many  atolls. 
Currently  harvested  by  the  Falconers. 

Ecology:  Needs  fine,  moist  soil  and  shade.  Though  its 
seeds  float  for  months  (Guppy,  1906),  it  will  probably  not 
become  established  on  any  other  motu,  due  to  the  prevalence  of 
rubbly  substrates. 

Phenology:  Flowers  and  fruit  in  March  and  May,  dies 
back  in  October. 

URTICACEAE 

*  Laportea  ruderalis  (Forst.  0  Chew  (Fig.  15) 

Fleurya  ruderalis  (Forst.  f.)  Gaud,  ex  Wedd 
Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Reported  1840,  collected 

1884.     L-3215  common  in   shady   areas  South  Island; 

L-3229  scattered  on  exposed  coral  and  sand,  west  side  Crescent 

Islet.  L-3253  under  shade  of  Cocos  and  Pisonia  on  north  side 

of  Long  Island. 

Distribution  and  Abundance:  K-88-3  South  Island,  Tr.  1, 

elevation  0.3  m,  under  old  Cocos  plantation,  in  humus  and 

rubble.     Range  extension  from  3  to  32  islets  (Table  3). 

Commonest    and    most    widespread    ground    cover, 


17 


patchily  distributed.  Rare  to  locally  abundant,  percentage 
cover  from  less  than  1%  in  herb  mats  of  tiny  motus  to  60%  in 
tall  Pisonia  forest.  Best  represented  on  Nake,  Long,  Brothers, 
South,  Pisonia,  Eitei,  and  Mannikiba,  where  coverage  exceeded 
50%  in  appropriate  habitats.  To  1.1  m  tall  on  Kimoa. 

Ecology:  Largest  specimens  found  under  Tournefortia. 
Pisonia,  Cocos,  or  Pandanus.  Tiny  (1-2  cm)  and  tougher  in 
sunny,  exposed  sites.  Halophytic,  pioneering  in  herb  mats  on 
islets  less  than  0.75  ha  in  size  (e.g.,  Fishball).  Optimum  habitat 
is  Tournefortia  scrub,  in  sunny  clearings,  or  belts  behind  beach 
scrub.  Uncommon  in  Pisonia  forest.  Occurs  in  both  windward 
and  leeward  sites,  but  in  greater  density  leeward.  Will  persist 
through  several  stages  of  plant  succession  if  given  adequate 
shade. 

Phenology:  Flowers  and  fruit  in  October.  March,  and 
May. 

Substrata:  Primarily  beach  gravel  or  coarse  rubble.  Also 
rubble-sand  mixtures;  not  lagoon  silt. 

OLACACEAE 

*  (#?)  Ximenia  americana  L.  (Fig.  1 1 ) 

Never  previously  collected.  K-90-170  South  Island. 
50-100  m  north  of  cistern,  elevation  0.3  m.  10-20  m  from 
coastal  Tournefortia  fringe,  within  Cocos  plantation.  Collected 
by  crew  of  the  yacht  Amanita  and  posted  by  Anne  Falconer  to 
AKK. 

Distribution  and  Abundance:  Locally  abundant  in  one 
location,  about  50  bushes  ( 3—4  m  high,  2-3  m  wide )  spread  over 
about  100  m.  Adjacent  to  indigenous  scrub,  on  edge  of  Cocos 
plantation  near  old  settlement. 

Phenology:  Flowering  in  July  1990. 

AMARANTHACEAE 

*  Achyranthes  canescens  R.  Br.  (Fig.  16,  PI.  41 ) 

Never  previously  collected.  K-88-1  South  Island, 
Tr.  5,  to  0.7  m,  elevation  0.3  m,  in  Tournefortia  fringe,  coral 
rubble. 

Distribution  and  Abundance:  Quite  widespread,  primarily 
in  interior  scrub  and  forest  of  19  motus  (Table  3),  from  tiny, 
barely  vegetated  Fishball  (0.73  ha)  to  the  largest.  South 
(1 06  ha).  Density  variable:  from  less  than  1  %  in  Tournefortia 
scrub  to  50%  local  ground  cover  in  mixed  Pandanus  forest. 
Primarily  associated  with  Tournefortia.  May  be  locally  abundant 
in  clearings  in  Pisonia  forests,  pure  or  mixed.  Often  in  a  zone 
dividing  Tournefortia  and  Pisonia  trees,  especially  on  Pig, 
Brothers,  and  Nake. 

Ecology:  Never  in  natural  herb  mats.  Needs  shade  but 
requires  some  direct  sun:  rare  in  pure  stands  of  Cocos  and 
Pisonia.  Prefers  small,  sunny  openings  in  forest  or  scrub. 
Drought-resistent  and  probably  partly  halophytic.  Dies  back 
annually  in  the  dry  season  and  reappears  with  winter  rains 
(Anne  Falconer,  personal  communication).  To  1.5  m  tall. 
Little  or  no  capacity  for  dispersal  by  sea.  On  other  islands, 
seeds  carried  by  birds,  especially  fruit  pigeons  (Guppy,  1906), 


but  pigeons  are  absent  from  the  Line  Islands.  Perhaps  dispersed 
by  the  long-tailed  cuckoo  (Ellis  et  al.,  1990). 

Phenology:  Flowers  and  fruit  present  in  October,  March, 
and  May. 

Substrata:  Lushest  growth  in  humus  soils  of  forest  interiors. 
Often  grows  in  pure  rubble. 

NYCTAGINACEAE 

*  Boerhavia  repens  L.  (Fig.  17,  PI.  34) 

Boerhavia  diffusa  L. 

Boerhavia  hirsuta:  Sensu  Bennett,  1840 

Boerhavia  species:  Dixon.  1884 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Reported  1 840,  collected 
1 884;  L-32 1 0. 3324, 3239, 3225, 3252, 3262, 3289, 329 1  from 
Windward,  Tridacna,  Nake.  Long,  Emerald,  and  South, 
respectively. 

Present  Distribution:  Cosmopolitan,  widespread  in  the 
Pacific.  K-90-164and  165  from  Ana- Ana.  Range  extension  on 
Caroline  from  6  to  33  motus  (Table  3). 

Abundance:  Present  in  every  habitat,  leeward  and 
windward,  ranging  from  less  than  1  to  80%  cover.  Often  in 
unpredictable  patches.  Best  locations  (>50%  cover)  on  Nake, 
Long,  Windward.  Pig,  Brothers,  Arundel.  Tridacna.  South. 
Ana-Ana,  Pisonia.  and  Pandanus  Islets. 

Ecology:  Mostly  found  beneath  Tournefortia.  either  in 
pure  scrub  or  mixed  with  Pisonia.  Cordia.  Morinda.  Suriana, 
or  Cocos.  Not  in  deep  Pisonia  shade;  rarely  in  herb  mats.  Thick 
ground  cover  in  indigenous  scrub  ( Shark )  or  within  clearings  in 
old  Cocos-Ipomoea  forest  (South),  where  it  mingles  with 
Phymatosorus,  reaching  a  high  density  (PI.  34)  and  large  size 
(rooting  at  nodes,  vines  exceeded  1  mlong).  BIRDS:  Bristle- 
thighed  curlews  fed  within  the  Boerhavia  mat  in  old  Cocos 
forests.  South.  Sticky  seeds  (.32  cm  [one-eighth  inch]  long) 
found  entangled  in  preened  down  and  adhering  to  contour 
feathers  of  a  juvenile  great  frigatebird  (PI.  42).  Species  is 
customarily  dispersed  around  large  oceanic  areas  and  within 
atolls  by  seabirds  such  as  red-footed  boobies  (Guppy.  1906; 
Ridley.  1930). 

Phenology:  Small  mauve  flowers  and  seeds  present  in 
October,  March,  and  May. 

Substrata:  Coral  rubble  with  sand  or  humus,  rarely  pure 
beach  rubble.  Lushest  growth  in  humus-and-guano-laden 
rubble  clearings  where  Pisonia  forest  once  grew. 

*  Pisonia  grandis  R.  Br.  (Fig.  18;  PI.  43) 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Collected  1884;  L-3280 
4  m  tree,  north  shore.  South.  Small  grove,  north  end.  Long. 

Present  Distribution:  Cosmopolitan,  pan-Pacific.  Caroline 
range  extension  from  2  to  29  motus  (Table  3). 

Abundance:  A  major  plant  community  (see  Plant 
Communities  section).  Caroline^  Pisonia  forests,  some  of  the 
last  remaining  groves  in  the  Pacific,  are  of  special  conservation 
value. 

Substrata:  Occupies,  and  contributes  to.  best  soils  on  atoll: 
mixture  of  rubble,  humus,  and  guano. 


18 


PORTULACACEAE 

*  Portulaca  lutea  Solander  ex  Forster  F.  (Fig.  19;  Pis.  34,38) 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Reported  1840  and  1884; 
L-3233  and  3292,  3231  .  3237,  3255,  3257,  from  South, 
Pandanus.  Nake.  Long,  and  Emerald,  respectively,  in  open 
coral,  rubble,  gravel,  and  exposed  areas,  to  1.5  dm  high. 

Present  Distribution:  Range  extension  from  5  to  33  islets 
(Table  3). 

Abundance:  Along  with  Heliotropium  anomalum  is  a 
component  of  the  plant  community.  Natural  Herb  Mat  (see 
Plant  Communities  section).  Widespread,  predictable  on  coast 
and  former  reef  channels  but  local  inland.  Covered  from  one 
to  60%  of  land  area  on  almost  every  transect,  windward  and 
leeward,  especially  facing  lagoon.  Best  areas  are  Long,  Tr.  4 
(36-m  wide  meadow);  South,  north  end  of  Tr.  6  (50  m  wide): 
Brothers,  lee,  almost  pure  mat  covering  20%  ground  (6  m 
wide);  Kimoa.  north  side  (8  m  wide),  10  cm  high;  Eitei,  north 
side,  5  cm  high. 

Ecology:  Primarily  occurs  along  edges  of  motus  in  rubble 
mat  and  open  Tournefortia  scrub,  averages  12  cm  high. 
Prominent  in  sparsely  vegetated  areas,  extending  seaward  to 
high  tide  level.  Halophytic;  highly  tolerant  of  sun.  A  Hat  mat 
in  exposed  areas  but  lusher  inland,  rising  to  2  dm  tall.  Generally 
found  with  Heliotropium,  Lepturus,  Boerhavia,  or  Laportea 
but  may  form  pure  mats.  Uncommon  in  Tournefortia  scrub 
patchy  in  clearings  within  Pisonia  forests  up  to  13  m  high 
Exceptionally  common  in  old  Cocos  groves  with  Boerhavia 
et  cetera  (PI.  34);  otherwise  rare  or  absent  from  closed  canopy 
Cocos  plantations.  Pinker  stems  found  in  sunny  sites.  BIRDS 
Provides  nesting  cushion  for  masked  booby,  sooty  tern,  brown 
noddy.  On  noddy  rock,  brown  noddies  nest  on  a  thick  mat  of 
pure  Portulaca.   Feeding  location  for  shorebirds. 

Phenology:  Flowers  and  fruit  October,  March,  and  May. 

Substrata:  Coral  rubble  and  gravel,  fine  to  very  coarse. 
Healthier  on  older  sands  and  coral-humus. 

ZYGOPHYLLACEAE 

*  Tribulus  cistoides  L.  (Fig.  1  1  ) 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Collected  1884.  L-3245in 
open  sandy  area  among  Tournefortia  shrubs.  Long  Island.  Not 
seen  elsewhere  on  atoll. 

Present  Distribution:  Not  seen  on  our  surveys,  but  present 
in  2  sites  on  west-central  Long  Island.  K-90-161  (collected  by 
Anne  Falconer),  probably  from  one  of  same  sites  as  1965 
collection.  Flowers  in  March. 

SURIANACEAE 

*  Suriana  maritima  L.  (Fig.  20;  Pis.  6,21,39,40,44) 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Collected  1884.  L-3220, 
shrub  to  1.8  m,  east  edge  of  Tridacna  Islet. 

Present  Distribution:  K-90-5, 6  from  South  Island.  Range 
expansion  from  one  to  9  motus  (Table  3). 

Abundance:  Occasional  on  Caroline.  Forms  a  vegetation 
unit.  Beach  Scrub  with  Suriana  ( see  Plant  Communities  section). 


Phenology:  Flowers  in  March  and  May. 

Substrata:  Best  sites  in  sand  but  also  on  coral  rubble. 

EUPHORBIACEAE 

#  Phyllanthus  amarus  Schum.  and  Thonn.  (Fig.  1 1 ) 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Collected  1884.  L-3283, 
herb  Phyllanthus  niruri  L.  (Trelease,  1884)  to  4  dm,  common 
on  north  side  of  South  Island. 

Present  Distribution:  K-90-10-13,  herb,  2  small  patches, 
South  Island.  Limited  to  a  few  square  meters  in  the  atoll's  only 
weedy  area,  less  than  10  m:  in  two  small  clearings  by  the 
recently-renovated  cistern.  South.  A  fairly  common  weed  in 
the  Society  and  Tuamotu  Islands,  therefore  probably  arrived 
with  Tahitian  copra-cutters  and  perhaps  again  within  the  last 
2  years.  Caroline's  only  established  "weed"  (excluding 
Polynesian  introductions  such  as  Cocos). 

MALVACEAE 

o  *  (**?)  (#?)  Hibiscus  tiliaceus  L.  (Fig.  1 1 ) 

Never  previously  collected.  K-90-8,  90-9  from  South 
Island,  northwest  peninsula,  in  Cocos  plantation  near  old 
settlement  and  "landing,"  in  coral  rubble  and  humus,  0.6  m  in 
elevation. 

Present  Distribution:  Two  or  three  large  spreading  trees  in 
heavy  Cocos  shade,  1 0  m  tall,  with  recumbent  branches  forming 
an  impenetrable  thicket.  This  species,  culturally  important  to 
Polynesians,  is  either  indigenous,  an  early  Polynesian 
introduction,  or  an  ornamental  brought  by  1 9th  century  settlers. 

°  *  (**'?)  (#?)  Thespesia  populnea  (L.)  Soland.  ex  Correa 
(Fig.  1  1 ) 

Never  previously  collected.  K-90-22,  154.  155  from 
South  Island,  in  Cocos  plantation  and  in  lagoon  strand,  northwest 
peninsula,  near  "landing." 

Present  Distribution:  Two  trees  ( 10  m  tall),  one  near  the 
cistern,  the  other  in  a  fringe  of  native  vegetation  bordering  the 
lagoon.  The  history  of  this  species  is  probably  the  same  as 
Hibiscus  tiliaceus  (above). 

*  SidafallaxWalp.  (Fig.  1 1) 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Collected  by  Dixon,  1884, 
who  found  one  specimen. 

Present  Distribution:  Not  seen  for  106  years.  K-90-156, 
157,  158  from  South  Island,  at  edge  of  cistern,  north  side.  One 
clump  located  in  a  sunny  clearing,  recently  enlarged  by  the 
Falconers. 

CONVULVULACEAE 

*  Ipomoea  macrantha  R  &  S  (Fig.  21;  Pis.  34,37) 

Ipomoea  tuba  (Schlecht.)  G.  Don 
Formerly  Known  Distribution:   L-3228  and  3293,  3242, 
325 1  on  South,  Nake,  and  Long,  respectively.  Trailing  vines, 
white  flowers,  stems  to  25  m  long  climbing  over  Tournefortia. 
Morinda.  and  Cocos. 


19 


History:  Not  collected  last  century,  though  plantation 
records  indicate  that  it  was  a  major  reason  for  the  abandonments 
of  the  coconut  plantations:  "The  Pohue  Vine  |misidentifiedas 
Tuumfetta(=Triumfetta)procumbens],  which  is  the  worst  pest 
on  the  island,  was  reported  in  1921  to  be  under  control" 
(Young,  ca.  1922).  Today  it  still  causes  severe  damage  to 
Cocos  on  South  Island,  strangling  about  two-thirds  of  the 
plantation  (54  ha). 

Present  Distribution:  Range  extension  from  three  to  seven 
motus,  five  Windward  and  two  Southern  Leeward  Islets 
(Table  3). 

Abundance:  Forms  part  of  a  vegetation  subunit.  Dying 
Cocos-lpomoea  Forest  (PI.  34,  Plant  Communities  section). 
An  indigenous,  nonparasitic  vine,  becoming  abundant  and 
strangling  in  disturbed  areas.  Rampant  growth  over  most  of  the 
interior  of  South  Island,  where  it  forms  dense  tangles  up  to 
25  m  high.  Less  dense  thickets  on  southern  Nake  drape 
Pandanus,  Tournefortia,  Morinda,  and  Cocos  to  10  m.  Our 
transects  on  Nake  were  not  rerouted  or  abandoned,  as  on  South. 
Coverage  scant  elsewhere,  generally  2-5%,  except  in  two 
Pisonia  sites,  where  its  coverage  was  20%  (Long  Island.  Tr.  B: 
Windward  Islet,  Tr.  1 ). 

Ecology:  Lush  in  dying  Cocos  forests  and  mixed  forest 
with  Pandanus,  because  of  relatively  fertile  soils,  moisture, 
humidity,  and  partly  sunny  clearings.  Strangles  all  but  the 
tallest  Pisonia  and  Cordia.  Typically  sea-dispersed  to  atolls 
(seeds  germinate  after  floating  up  to  1  year  in  seawater),  crawls 
inland,  progressively  dropping  seeds,  to  attain  full  size  in 
interior  forests  (Guppy,  1906;  Ridley,  1930).  Seeds  of  /.  pes- 
caprae  are  known  to  be  ingested  by  white  terns  in  the  Marshall 
Islands,  perhaps  as  gizzard  stones  (Fosberg,  1953).  Possibly 
these  same  terns,  abundant  at  Caroline,  once  aided  the  seed 
dispersal  of  /.  macrantha.  Also  characteristic  of  Cocos 
plantations  elsewhere  in  the  Pacific  (Fosberg.  1965:  Stoddart 
&  Sachet.  1969:  Lamberson.  1987). 

Substrata:  Prefers  humus-laden  rubble  but  can  grow  in 
coarse  rubble  and  sand,  especially  in  leeward  areas. 

BORAGINACEAE 

*  Cordia  subcordata  Lam.  (Fig.  22:  PI.  27) 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Collected  in  1X84.  L-3213 
and  326 1  a,  3228,  3246.  and  326 1  b  on  South.  Pandanus.  Long, 
anil  Emerald,  respectively;  flowering  trees  to  4.5  m  high  in 
leeward  coral  rubble  or  along  lagoon. 

Present  Distribution:  Africa  to  Polynesia.  K-90-3  from 
South  Island,  lagoon  edge.  Range  expansion  on  Caroline  from 
5  to  23  motus  (Table  3). 

Phenology:  Peak  flowering  November  through  April, 
fruits  collected  in  March  and  Max 

Abundance:  A  separate,  though  minor,  plant  community 
(Plant  Communities  section).  Caroline's  Cordia  forests, 
typically  small  and  mixed  \\  ith  other  emergents.  are  some  of 
the  last  remaining  gun  es  in  the  Pacific  and  are  thus  of  particular 
importance  to  conservation. 


*  Heliotropiumanomalum  H.  &  A.  (Fig.  23:  Pis.  17.33.45-47) 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Recorded  (as 
H.  curassavicum)  in  1840,  collected  in  1884.  L-3222  and  3288. 
3240, 3248, 3256, 3288  on  South,  Danger.  Long,  and  Emerald, 
respectively. 

Present  Distribution:  Pantropical.  K-90-17  from  Ana- 
Ana.  In  coral  gravel,  leeward,  and  windward  shores.  Range 
extension  on  Caroline  from  4  to  34  motus  (Table  3). 

Abundance:  Forms  part  of  a  major  vegetation  unit.  Natural 
Herb  Mat  (Plant  Communities  section),  often  associated  with 
Laportea,  Lepturus,  or  Boerhavia.  Area  coverage  ranges  from 
less  than  1%  to  50%.  Widespread,  predictable  on  wind-  and 
salt-blown,  low  flats  where  vegetation  does  not  overhang  edge 
of  motu.  Also  in  ancient  reef  channels  and  newly  evolving  land 
connecting  islets.  Covers  major  areas  of  islets — that  is.  those 
less  than  1.0  ha  (e.g.,  Fishball.  Skull,  and  Bo'sun  Bird.  Best 
developed  on  Skull.  Tridacna.  South.  Emerald,  and  Mannikiba 
(50%  coverage,  western  seaward  rim). 

Ecology:  Halophytic  pioneer.  Heights  to  22  cm,  averaging 
7  em.  Thrives  in  heat  and  exposure. 

Phenology:   Flowers  and  fruits  year  round. 

Substrata:  Primarily  coral  rubble  and  rubbly  sand.  Marginal 
habitats  extend  down  to  high  tide  line  in  areas  of  coarse  coral 
chunks,  where  it  is  tiny  and  leathery. 

*  Tournefortia  argentea  L.  (Fig.  24;  Pis.  8.37.47.48) 

Messerschmidia  argentea  (L.f.)  Johnston 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Collected  1884.  L-3216. 
3226, 324 1 ,  3249, 3258  from  South,  Tridacna,  Nake,  Long,  and 
Emerald  Isle;  shrub  to  3  m  high,  edge  of  lagoon  and  above  high 
tide,  with  white  flowers, 

Present  Distribution:  Range  extension  from  5  to  38  motus 
(Table  3).  Widespread  in  the  Pacific,  especially  on  small  islets. 
Caroline's  large  tracts  are  excellent  examples  of  relatively 
undisturbed,  pure  Tournefortia  scrub  and  forest. 

Abundance:  Dominates  the  atoll  woodlands,  forming  the 
major  \  egetation  type  ( Plant  Communities  section).  On  almost 
every  motu  ranging  from  a  spattering  of  exposed  shrubs  within 
herb  mats,  through  scrublands  and  taller  forests  to  14  m  high. 

Ecology:  Supports  seven  species  of  breeding  seabirds; 
provides  feeding  habitats  for  reef  herons  (Egretta  sacra). 
shorebirds,  land  crabs,  and  rats. 

Phenology:   Flowers  and  fruits  year  round. 

Substrata:  Pure  coral  clinker;  mixtures  of  rubble,  gravel, 
sand,  and  humus. 

BRASSICACEAE 

*  Lepidium  Indentation  Montin  (Fig.  1 1 ) 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Reported  in  1S25:  "a  boat 
load  of  pepper-grass  and  pursley"  (Paulding.  1X31)  and  in 
1835.  "a  Lepidium  of  luxuriant  growth"  (Bennett.  1840). 
Collected  by  Dixon  as  /..  piscidium  Forst  in  1883. 

Present  Distribution:  Widely  distributed  throughout  the 
North  and  South  Pacific.    K-90-169  and  171  (collected  by 


20 


Alexandre  Falconer),  on  Tridacna  and  Pisonia,  most  probably 
in  coastal  Tournefortia  scrub. 

RUBIACEAE 

*  Morinda  citrifolia  L.  (Fig.  25;  PI.  48) 

Formerly  Known  Distribution:  Reported  1840,  collected 
1884.  L-32 14. 32 17  and  3282: 3232;  3254  on  South,  Nake,  and 
Long,  respectively. 

Present  Distribution:  K-90-4,  18  from  South  Island, 
lagoon  edge,  and  Ana-Ana.  respectively.  Range  extension  on 
Caroline  from  3  to  30  motus  (Table  3). 

Abundance:  Coverage  from  2%  to  50%.  Basically  an 
inland  species,  widespread  and  predictable  in  scrub  and  forest 
understory.  Rarely  a  component  of  the  canopy,  except  on 
Raurau.  where  Morinda  grows  12  m  tall  in  a  13  m  Pisonia 
forest.  Essentially  associated  with  established  Tournefortia 
woodlands  on  motus  greater  than  one  hectare  in  size.  Quite 
common  on  South  Island  despite  major  disturbance,  occurring 
within  beach  strand,  Cocos  plantations,  and  Cocos-Ipomoea 
interior.  Best  locations  (40-60%  coverage):  Nake.  Tr.  3; 
Tridacna,  both  transects;  Long,  Tr.  8;  Raurau  and  Ana-Ana. 

Ecology:  Appears  early  in  plant  succession:  inToumefortia 
scrub  as  an  early  pioneer  (Stage  I),  then  from  Stages  II  to  IV, 
progressively  becoming  more  common  and  robust.  Not  in  pure 
Pisonia  forest  (Stage  V).  Much  less  common  in  Pandanus 
stands.  Although  it  thrives  best  in  light  to  heavy  shade, 
preferably  growing  in  moist  "soil,"  one  leathery  seedling  (7  cm 
high)  had  gained  a  foothold  in  exposed  rubbly  Heliotropium 
flats  on  Fishball  Islet. 

Biogeographical  Note:  Generally  considered  a  naturalized 
aboriginal  introduction  on  most  Pacific  islands.  Morinda  could 
be  native  to  Caroline,  as  theorized  for  the  northern  Line  Islands 
(Wester,  1985).  Although  possibly  introduced  by  early 
Tuamotuan  settlers,  its  present  distribution  strongly  suggests 
that  it  is  indigenous.  Throughout  the  atoll  Morinda  occurs  in 
the  greatest  densities  on  motus  with  no  anthropogenic  forests 
or  in  areas  distant  from  historical  settlements  (Fig.  26).  On 
Nake,  Morinda  occurs  frequentl — in  places  abundantly — within 
the  interior  Pisonia  forests,  yet  its  coverage  is  only  5-10%  in 
mixed  Pandanus— Cocos  forests  in  the  southern  sector.  It  also 
appears  to  be  part  of  natural  biological  succession  (Table  6). 
Further  support  for  this  theory  comes  from  nearby  Flint. 
Though  there  is  no  direct  archaeological  evidence  that  Flint 
was  settled  in  prehistoric  times  (Garnett,  1983),  our  1990 
surveys  found  Morinda  in  all  habitats  (mixed  woodland,  native 
coastal  scrub.  Cocos  plantations,  and  abandoned  settlement). 

Originating  in  Polynesia,  Morinda  has  been  widely 
dispersed  by  man  but  has  apparently  also  spread,  unaided  by 
man.  "widely  by  sea  in  the  Malayan  and  Polynesian  Islands" 
(Ridley,  1930).  Its  air-filled,  buoyant  pyrenes  can  float  for  at 
least  53  days  and  "its  seeds  are  almost  certainly  disseminated 
by  birds  and  bats"  (Guppy,  1906).  It  could  also  be  disseminated 
by  Coenobita  crabs  and  rats  within  and  between  motus,  as  has 
been  found  elsewhere  by  Ridley. 

Phenology:  Flowers  and  fruits  year  round. 


Substrata:  Coral  rubble,  gravel,  sand,  and  humus.  Rarely 
found  in  coarse  clinker.  On  larger  motus.  prefers  moist  soils 
under  tall  forests. 

GOODENIACEAE 

c  *  Scaevola  sericea  var.  sericea  Vahl  (Fig.  1 1 ) 

Scaevola  taccada  var.  sericea  (Vahl)  St.  John 

Never  previously  collected.  K-88-2,  Windward  Islet, 
central-windward  side,  elevation  0.3  m. 

Distribution  and  Abundance:  One  wind-  and  salt-sheared 
"hedge,"  found  by  K.  Teeb'aki  on  Windward  Islet,  was  growing 
on  a  coarse  rubble  beach.  "The  saltbush...,  being  recorded  for 
the  first  time  too  from  the  island. ..covered  approximately  3% 
of  the  islet's  land  area  [this  probably  can  be  translated  as  "3% 
of  the  area  covered  at  that  location  on  the  transect."  as  we 
understood  from  Mr.  Teeb'aki's  description  that  it  was  quite 
small],  occupying  the  mid-windward  side.  The  patch  grew 
very  low — only  up  to  2'  high  with  its  foliage  forming  an 
extended  raised  mat  canopy  all  along  the  area  it  occupied" 
(Teeb'aki,  1988).  We  have  been  unable  to  return  to  this  spot  to 
observe  and  photograph  it  directly. 

Because  Scaevola  is  hardy,  halophytic,  and  widespread  in 
the  Pacific,  it  is  surprising  that  it  is  so  rare  on  Caroline. 
However,  none  occur  on  Vostok,  and  only  one  clump  is  known 
from  Flint  (Clapp  &  Sibley,  1971b;  Garnett,  1983).  Fosberg 
(1953)  noted  that  Scaevola  seeds  are  transported  by  bristle- 
thighed  curlews  (Numenius  taitensis)  in  the  Marshall  Islands: 
curlews  are  common  on  Caroline  ( Subchapter  1 .2,  this  volume) 
and  could  have  brought  seeds  from  elsewhere. 

Substrata:  Coarse  rubble,  windward  beach. 

°  *  Scaevola  sericea  var.  tuamotensis  (Si.  John)Fosb.  (Fig.  1 1 ) 
Scaevola  taccada  tuamotensis  St.  John 

Never  previously  collected.  K-90-168  (collected  by 
Alexandre  Falconer),  northeast  peninsula.  South  Island,  in 
coral  rubble. 

Present  Distribution:  One  individual,  of  unknown  size. 
with  Suriana  and  Heliotropium,  northeast  peninsula,  South 
Island,  facing  the  inner  side  of  the  "blind  passage." 

Floristics  and  Ecology  of  the  Motus 

Size  of  the  Flora:  Atoll  floras  characteristically  lack 
diversity.  Numbers  of  species  range  from  3  to  around  150  in  the 
Pacific  and  284  in  the  Indian  Ocean.  The  flora  of  the  Southern 
Line  Islands  is  particularly  impoverished  because  of  /.  their 
easterly  location  ( far  from  the  major  source  areas  of  Australasia); 

2.  low  profiles  (most  only  rise  a  few  meters  above  sea  level); 

3.  lack  of  topographic  diversity  (most  have  a  very  limited  range 
of  habitats);  4.  low  to  medium  rainfall  (approximately 
1,500  mm  p. a.);  and  5.  edaphic  factors  such  as  salinity,  highly 
calcareous  soils,  et  cetera.  Long-distance  dispersal  and  hardiness 
are  important  factors  in  establishing  a  flora,  especially  since  the 
closest  high  island,  Tahiti,  is  830  km  away,  and  the  ultimate 
source  of  its  flora,  the  Malayan-Melanesian  region,  is  over 
8.000  km  away.     South  America,  the  closest  continent,  is 


21 


approximately  9,000  km  distant.  The  motus  of  Aitutaki,  for 
example,  at  a  similar  latitude  but  further  west  and  wetter,  are 
considered  depleted  with  45  species.  Fanning,  at  a  similar 
longitude  but  wetter,  has  123  species.  Tarawa,  3,900  km  to  the 
northwest,  receives  a  similar  rainfall  but  supports  109  species. 

Where  an  atoll's  potential  flora  is  larger,  the  increased 
shade  and  greater  protection  from  wind,  salt  spray,  and  storms 
result  in  a  greater  number  of  natural  plant  species  on  its  larger 
motus.  However,  such  atolls  are  generally  inhabited  and 
alterations  by  both  aboriginal  and  modern  man  have  modified 
their  original  flora.  Caroline's  isolation,  variety  of  islet  areas, 
and  minimal  human  disturbance  all  contribute  to  its  excellence 
for  the  study  of  atoll  evolution. 

The  number  of  species  presently  established  on  Caroline's 
39  motus  is  27  (Tables  2,  3).  The  previous  expedition  in 
1 965  (Clapp  &  Sibley,  1971a)  collected  20  species,  of  which  4 
were  new  to  the  atoll.  Their  total  of  35  species,  however, 
incorporating  reports  and  collections  from  the  1800's,  is 
misleading.  Our  total,  6  of  which  were  new  records,  would 
have  brought  the  atoll  total  to  44  (plus  about  15  more 
unestablished,  mostly  garden,  plants).  However,  following 
recent  custom  (see  Vegetation  section ),  we  have  listed  transient 
orextinct  members  of  the  flora  separately  (Table  1).  To  include 
them  would  obscure  the  near-pristine  nature  of  the  atoll  and 
bias  our  analyses  of  species-area  relationships. 

The  1 883  drawings  of  the  South  Island  settlement,  inhabited 
when  most  of  Caroline's  species  were  catalogued,  shows  that 
the  island  was  vastly  different  (compare  Pis.  2  and  24).  A 
century  ago  homes  were  set  amidst  large  grassy  clearings;  now 
the  site  is  completely  obliterated  beneath  shady  21-m-tall 
coconut  palms.  Nine  exotic  plant  species  have  not  been  seen 
for  over  a  century  (Table  1 ).  Evidently  most  ornamentals  and 
domestic  vegetables  perished  during  uninhabited  periods.  The 
present  residents  struggle  to  keep  garden  plants  alive  because 
of  poor  soils,  irregular  rainfall,  and  foraging  land  crabs.  A  few 
native  species  might  also  have  been  eliminated  during  the 
guano  and  copra-harvesting  years. 

Numbers  of  Indigenous  Plants:  A  comparison  of  the 
percentage  of  indigenous  species  between  different  island 
groups  (Table  4)  shows  that  Caroline,  with  85%*  (N  =  23) 
indigenous,  is  unusually  high.  Only  11  of  44  Pacific  atolls 
reviewed  have  more  than  75%  of  their  species  indigenous.  Of 
these,  nine  ( including  Caroline)  are  remote  and  lack  permanent 
human  occupation. 

The  Tuamotu  Islands  ( 149°  to  134°W)  lie  east  and  south 
of  Caroline,  yet  they  harbor  considerably  larger  floras.  Rainfall 
is  similar.  Three  of  them  average  121  species  (Table  4). 
averaging  42  indigenous  species.  When  the  variables  rainfall 
and  distance  from  a  colonization  source  to  the  west  are 
considered,  the  proximity  of  the  Tuamotus  to  the  diverse  high 


*  Note:  Perhaps  as  high  as  93% ;  the  Digitaria  sp.,  if  still  extant, 
is  of  unknown  identity  and  origin,  and  Species  A  has  yet  to  be 
determined. 


islands  of  the  Societies  seems  to  play  a  major  part  in 
determiningtheir  indigenous  flora.  A  similar  situation  exists  in 
the  southern  Cook  Islands.  Caroline  and  other  remote  Line  and 
Phoenix  Islands  are  sufficiently  isolated  from  high  volcanic 
islands  that  they  exhibit  a  much  simpler  flora.  Tahiti,  the 
closest  high  island  (830  km  south),  is  in  the  wrong  direction  for 
direct  currents,  winds,  or  vagrant  birds  to  bring  seeds  to 
Caroline. 

Composition  of  the  Flora  (Tables  2. 3 ):  Caroline's  botanical 
affinities  lie  with  other  southern  Line  Islands  and  the  Tuamotus. 
Although  the  strand  and  inland  floras  consist  of  pan-Pacific  or 
pantropical  species,  there  are  several  widespread  species  and 
communities  that  are  notably  absent.  Those  that  survive  have 
withstood  the  atoll  tests  of  time — poor  soils,  scarcity  of  fresh 
water,  periodic  inundation  by  salt  water,  intermittent  cyclonic 
storms  and  hurricanes,  harsh  climate,  and  high  seedling 
mortality.  Caroline  provides  an  excellent  ecological  laboratory 
in  which  floristic  correlations  with  variations  in  habitat,  motu 
size,  and  leeward/windward  aspect  may  be  studied.  Fosberg 
(1985)  and  Sachet  (1967)  have  noted  the  importance  of  such 
details  in  understanding  the  biogeography  and  taxonomy  of 
Pacific  plants. 

Caroline's  present  established  flora  includes  only  one 
weed  species  (Phyllanthus  amarus),  represented  by  a  tiny 
patch  less  than  2  m:  in  size.  There  are  two  Polynesian 
introductions  (Cocos,  Tacca).  Pandanus  tectorius,  Morinda 
citrifolia,  Thespesia  populnea,  Ximenia  americana,  and 
Hibiscus  tiliaceus,  though  indigenous,  may  have  been 
introduced  by  Polynesians  or  1 9th-century  settlers.  (See  section 
on  Vegetation.) 

Trees:  Seven  species  present.  Only  three — Pacificwide 
natives — are  widespread:  Pisoniagrandis.  Morinda  citrifolia. 
and  Cordia  subcordata.  Two  are  locally  abundant:  Cocos 
nucifera  and  Pandanus  tectorius,  while  the  rest,  Thespesia 
populnea  and  Hibiscus  tiliaceus.  are  rare  and  limited  to  the  old 
settlement  site.  The  absence  of  typical  Pacific  species  such  as 
Calophyllum  inophyllum  and  Guettarda  speciosa  is  notable,  as 
they  occur  naturally  on  atolls  such  as  Rangiroa.  further  east 
(Stoddart  &  Sachet.  1969). 

Shrubs:  Five  species  present,  at  least  four  indigenous. 
Only  Tournefortia  argentea  is  abundant:  its  most  abundant  size 
class  is  under4  m.  Scaevola  and  Suriana.  tough  and  widespread 
elsewhere,  are  poorly  represented  on  Caroline.  It  is  noteworthy 
that  two  varieties  of  Scaevola  sericea  are  present.  Species  A  is 
represented  by  a  single  individual,  Ximenia  americana.  by  a 
single,  large  patch.  Pemphis  acidula.  though  common  on  atolls 
of  similar  latitude  and  climate,  is  absent  from  most  of  the  Line 
and  Phoenix  groups  (Stoddart  &  Gibbs,  1975;  Fosberg  & 
Sachet,  no  date).  This  may  be  due  to  the  paucity  of  its  preferred 
habitats:  low  rocky  substrates  (reef  rock,  conglomerate  rock) 
and  sand-gravel  ridges. 

Herbs:  Fifteen  species  present,  at  least  12  indigenous.  Of 
these  only  seven  are  common:  Heliotropium  anomalum. 
Boerhavia  re  pens.  Portulaca  lutea,  Laportea  ruder  alls, 
Achyranthes  canescens,  Lepturus  repens,  and  Phymatosorus 


22 


scolopendria.  Ipomoea  macrantha  and  Tacca  leontopetaloides 
are  locally  abundant,  while  Phyllanthus  amarus,  Tribulus 
cistoides,  Lepidium  bidentatum,  and  Psilotum  nudum  are  rare 
and  localized.  Digitaria  sp.  may  be  extinct.  The  fact  that  Sida 
fallax  has  only  been  recorded  twice  in  106  years  is  curious. 

Ecological  Succession 

We  have  attempted  to  trace  the  development  of  Caroline' s 
flora  from  the  smallest  to  largest  motus,  using  field  data  and 
aerial  photos,  which  reveal  past  geological  processes.  Three 
tables  provide  this  analysis  of  ecological  succession:  Table  5 
presents  Caroline's  motus  in  order  of  ascending  size,  together 
with  the  numbers  of  plant  species  and  major  plant  communities. 
Since  the  atoll's  total  land  area  is  small,  our  data  provide 
relatively  complete  floristic  lists  for  each  islet  and  detailed 
maps  of  their  plant  communities  (Figs.  37-57).  The  number  of 
species  varied  from  3  growing  on  4  tiny  islets  (0.02  ha  each)  to 
23  on  South  ( 104.41  ha).  Because  the  total  number  of  species 
for  the  entire  atoll  (27)  is  also  small,  the  addition  of  one  or  two 
rare  species  contributes  significantly  to  the  total  flora.  Such 
additions  must  be  kept  in  perspective  when  evaluating  plant 
succession. 

Table  3  provides  a  summary  of  plant  species  distribution 
by  islet  in  decreasing  order  of  abundance,  and  Table  6  is  a 
summary  of  plant  species  distribution  and  relative  abundance 
with  respect  to  islet  area  and  the  primary  mode  of  seed  dispersal. 

Basic  Serai  Stages 

Islets  appear,  grow,  mature  ecologically,  or  vanish  in 
violent  storms.  Many  interacting  factors,  including  geographical 
(islet  area,  atoll  shape,  distance  from  high  islands  and  continents), 
geological  (changes  in  sea  level),  chemical  (nitrates  from  bird 
droppings,  leaf  fall,  et  cetera),  climatological  (wind,  droughts, 
storms,  microclimates),  and  biological  (seabirds,  rats,  land 
crabs,  and  man,  both  aboriginal  and  modern ),  constantly  interact 
to  change  conditions.  The  relative  influence  of  some  of  these 
factors  is  evident  when  comparing  the  floras  on  motus  of 
different  sizes. 

Seed-dispersal  mechanisms  (Table  6)  and  the  presence  of 
underground  fresh  water  are  also  vital.  Unfortunately,  the 
relationships  between  groundwater  salinity,  species  distribution, 
and  vegetation  patterns  on  atolls  are  poorly  understood  ( Fosberg. 
1985).  The  presence  and  relative  salinity  of  permanent  water 
depends  on  Ghyben-Herzberg  lenses  of  varying  thickness  on 
different  islets,  and  this  in  turn  depends  upon  island  dimensions 
(especially  width),  soil  porosity,  rainfall,  tidal  fluctuation,  and 
other  hydrological  factors.  Though  groundwater  supplies  have 
been  studied  on  many  atolls  (Wiens,  1962;  Maude,  1953),  each 
island  group  is  so  unique  that  it  is  unwise  to  extrapolate 
information  from  one  to  the  other. 

Caroline's  39  motus  fall  naturally  into  4  size  classes: 
motus  with  areas  of  a)  <0.2  ha,  b)  0.2  to  0.7  ha,  c)  0.8  to 
25.0  ha,  and  d)  >25.0  ha.  These  size  groupings  harbor  all  5  of 
the  serai  stages  identified  on  Enewetak  Atoll  (Lamberson, 
1987),  tailored  to  reflect  Caroline's  particular  geography, 
geology,  and  impoverished  flora.  Each  stage  may  be  the  sole 
example  of  ecological  succession  on  an  islet  or  may  occur  as 


one  of  several  stages.  Typically  the  early  stages  cover  the 
peripheral  rubble  and  scrubby  outer  zones,  while  the  later  ones 
appear  as  a  series  of  roughly  concentric  bands  progressing 
inland. 

Stage  1:  Early  pioneers  on  sandbars,  spits,  or  small  rubbly 
islets  subject  to  storm  damage  and  washover.  Harsh  conditions, 
intense  sun,  drying  winds,  salt  spray.  High  salt  concentration 
in  the  substrate.  Lack  of  fresh  water  and  nutrients.  Plant  genera 
present  include  Heliotropium,  Portulaca.  Lepturus,  Boerhavia, 
and  seedling oropenTo!/r/ie/o/-f/a  scrub.  No  Cocos.  This  stage 
is  found  on  many  small  motus  (Noddy  Rock,  Fishball)  and 
former  interislet  channels  (e.g.,  Long  Island). 

Stage  II:  Thick  scrub  of  mixed  genera,  often  impenetrable. 
Its  protective  barrier  allows  for  the  development  of  vegetation 
on  the  larger  islets.  Seabirds  begin  to  contribute  to  the  soil 
(guano,  eggs,  regurgitated  fish,  decaying  nesting  material). 
Plant  genera  include  Toumefortia,  Suriana,  Cordia,  and 
Laportea.  If  Cocos  present,  accompanied  by  coconut  crabs. 
Very  common  around  the  periphery  of  most  motus  just  inland 
of  the  native  herb  mats  or  flanking  sheltered  shores  adjacent  to 
the  lagoon  (South.  Kota). 

Stage  III:  Trees  larger,  seabirds  add  further  to  soil  fertility. 
Open  grassland  may  develop  in  sunny  clearings  (Tridacna). 
Added  plant  communities  and  Cordia-Tournefortia, 
Tournefortia-Morinda,  and  Pisonia— Toumefortia  forests. 
Occurs  in  the  next  inner  concentric  zone  of  vegetation  to 
Stage  II  on  larger  motus  (Nake,  Long)  or,  more  commonly,  the 
entire  interior  of  smaller  ones  (Pandanus,  Southern  Leeward 
Islets). 

Stage  IV:  Pisonia  dominates  the  older  mixed  forest. 
Morinda  and  Toumefortia  reach  for  the  sun.  Forests  are  more 
open.  Undergrowth  mostly  a  ground  cover  of  Laportea, 
Boerhavia,  Lepturus,  and  Portulaca.  Covers  the  main  portion 
of  larger  islets.  If  Cocos  and  Pandanus  present,  forms  a  mixed 
forest  with  vines  (southern  Nake,  Shark).  Coconut  crabs 
common.  A  widespread  stage  in  the  center  of  most  motus 
(Central  Leeward,  Windward  Islets). 

Stage  V:  Pisonia  takes  over.  Other  trees  are  confined  to 
the  forest  edges.  Always  in  the  deep  interior  of  the  larger  islets. 
Little  or  no  ground  cover.  Abundant  nesting  black  noddies 
(Anous  minutus).  A  more  restricted  stage  (Brothers,  Raurau, 
central  Nake,  Pig). 

Ecological  Succession  on  Motus  of  Different  Size  Classes 

To  assist  discussions  of  succession  on  Caroline's  motus, 
refer  to  the  individual  vegetation  maps  and  graphs 
(Figs.  27-57)  and  photographs  (Pis.  13-80).  particularly 
Figs.  27-30.  The  latter  figures  summarize  the  amounts  of  each 
islet's  surface  covered  by  each  major  plant  community,  as  well 
as  providing  the  numbers  and  percentages  of  indigenous  species 
for  each  islet. 

a)  Motus  with  Areas  <0.2  ha  (Figs.  27,31;  PI.  49; 
Tables  5.6):  Caroline  has  four  motus  in  this  category,  three 
windward  and  one  leeward,  whose  combined  area  totals 
0. 15  ha.  There  are  also  three  incipient  islets  which,  because  of 
their  temporary  character,  have  not  been  counted  in  Caroline's 
overall  total  (Fig.  2;  PI.  15).  With  the  exception  of  Noddy 
Rock — a  jagged,  upraised  limestone  plateau — all  consist 


23 


predominantly  of  coarse  coral  rubble  (75-98%  coverage). 
These  liny  motus  are  the  simplest  ecosystems  on  the  atoll, 
representing  early  Stage  I  in  plant  succession.  The  number  of 
plant  species  per  motu  averages  three,  all  hardy,  sea-dispersed, 
and  salt-tolerant  pioneers  (Heliotropium,  Portulaca,  Lepturus, 
Tournefurtia).  The  sole  plant  community  is  a  natural  herb  mat 
of  varying  thickness  and  extent.  Tournefortia,  though  stunted 
and  scattered,  is  not  sufficiently  common  to  form  a  separate 
scrub  habitat.  Indigenous  vegetation  covers  2  to  22%  of  the 
islet  areas.  Seabirds.  especially  brown  noddies  and  red-tailed 
tropicbirds,  may  attempt  to  nest. 

b)  Motus  with  Areas  0.2  to  0.7  ha  ( Figs.  28,3 1 :  Tables  5.6): 
There  are  five  leeward  motus  in  this  category  whose  combined 
areas  total  2.21  ha.  Their  vegetative  cover  is  more  extensive 
and  diverse  than  in  size  class  a,  with  herb  mats  and  Tournefortia 
scrub  and  forest,  but  open  rubble  is  still  abundant  (30-55% 
cover).  Plant  succession  corresponds  to  late  Stage  I  and 
Stage  II.  The  average  number  of  species  is  8.2  (range  6-11), 
one-third  of  Caroline's  total.  All  vegetation  on  these  motus  is 
indigenous  except  for  a  few  Cocos  palms.  Seeds  are  dispersed 
by  sea,  wind,  and  birds. 

With  the  appearance  of  shrubs,  the  number  of  species 
increases  markedly,  and  woodlands,  primarily  of  Tournefortia, 
form  and  expand  to  create  dense  thickets  averaging  5  m  tall  and 
covering  25%  of  the  land  area.  Canopies  of  10  m  occur  on 
motus  Nautonga  and  Kota.  Seabird  colonies  of  up  to  six 
species  (brown  and  red-footed  boobies,  great  frigatebirds, 
black  and  brown  noddies,  white  terns)  are  present. 

A  low  herb  mat,  dominated  by  Heliotropium,  Portulaca, 
Boerhavia,  and,  more  rarely,  Lepturus,  develops  first,  after 
which  Tournefortia  quickly  becomes  established.  Shade, 
producing  locally  humid  conditions,  and  better  "soils"  derived 
from  guano,  decomposing  leaves,  and  the  activities  of  land 
crabs  and  rats,  provide  appropriate  habitat  for  Laportea  and 
occasional  Phymatosorus  and  Achyranthes.  The  major  tree 
species — Pisonia,  Morinda.  Cordia,  and  Cocos — subsequently 
appear  but  are  relatively  rare.  Pisonia,  typically  an  inland 
species  assumed  to  need  companion  trees  and  underground 
water  (Wiens,  1962;  Spicer  &  Newbery.  1979),  could  well  be 
salt  tolerant  as  it  occurs  on  motus  as  small  as  0.2  ha  (Tables  5,6 ). 
In  this  size  class  Pisonia  occupies  only  2-6%  of  the  total  islet 
areas. 

c)  Motus  with  Areas  from  0.8  to  25.0  ha  (Figs.  29,31; 
Tables  5,6):  All  27  motus  in  this  category  share  a  similar 
complement  of  species  and  plant  communities  (Tables  5,  6). 
Their  combined  area  totals  1 24.35  ha.  They  are  well  wooded 
(Fig.  29),  although  the  leeward  motus  have  a  higher  proportion 
of  rubble  and  herb  mats,  and  forests  are  higher  to  windward. 
Unvegetated  rubble  covers  less  land  area  (219? )  than  in  size 
classes  a  and  b  (87%  and  39%,  respectively).  Within  the 
woodlands  of  these  motus,  substrates  mature  from  basic  rubble 
to  primitive  "soils"  with  small,  but  significant,  structural 
development.  Then  flora  shows  increasing  diversity  with  size, 
and  almost  the  lull  complement  of  seabirds  may  nest. 

All  natural  ecosystems  are  firmly  established;  canopy 
heights  range  from 4 to  2 1  m.  On  Booby  Islet  (0.84  ha).  Pisonia 
suddenly  becomes  very  common,  and  the  Pisonia  forests  on 
North  Brothers  (1.71  ha)  and  Pig  (7.25  ha),  at  21  m.  are  the 


tallest  on  Caroline.  As  rich  guano  and  dead  foliage  accumulate, 
a  layer  of  phosphate-rich  humus  enables  those  species  already 
present  but  poorly  represented  on  the  small  motus  (Pisonia. 
Morinda,  Boerhavia,  Laportea,  Achyranthes)  to  increase  in 
abundance  and  stature  (Table  6).  Additional  species  are  Suriana, 
Pandanus,  Scaevola,  Ipomoea,  Lepidium,  and  Species  A. 

Plant  succession,  ranging  from  Stage  III  to  Stage  V  in  the 
interior,  primarily  involves  forest  maturity  rather  than  the 
addition  of  large  numbers  of  species.  On  the  larger  islets,  the 
numberof  plant  species  increases  by  relatively  small  increments, 
filling  out  the  subcanopy  layers  and,  in  the  cases  of  Cordia  and 
Pandanus,  adding  variety  to  the  canopy. 

The  average  number  of  plant  species  is  1 1 .0,  ranging  from 
4  to  15.  If  we  divide  the  motus  into  smaller  size  classes,  we  find 
that  their  species  numbers  increase  slightly  with  increasing 
size:  8.0  species  for  areas  0.8-1.0  ha,  9.8  species  for  areas 
1.1-2.0  ha,  1 1.5  species  for  areas  2.1-4.0  ha.  1 1.3  species  for 
areas  4.1-10.0  ha,  and  12.0  for  areas  10. 1-22  ha.  An  increase 
in  herbs  (range  3-9)  is  primarily  responsible  for  these  higher 
averages  (Table  5). 

Despite  the  large  range  of  motu  sizes  in  this  category,  plant 
communities  are  essentially  natural  (Table  5).  Their  overall 
species  composition  is  96%  indigenous.  Seventeen  of  the 
motus  lack  Cocos,  the  only  introduced  species  in  this  area 
category,  which  is  represented  by  small,  isolated  clumps  or 
individual  palms. 

On  the  larger  motus,  and  within  the  taller  forests,  more 
species  of  birds,  especially  red-footed  boobies,  great  frigatebirds. 
white  terns,  and  black  noddies,  nest  in  increasingly  large 
colonies,  furnishing  more  minerals  to  the  developing  soils, 
especially  where  Pisonia  covers  large  areas. 

In  summary,  by  the  time  a  motu  on  Caroline  has  reached 
0.8  ha  in  size,  all  the  natural  plant  communities,  most  species 
of  trees,  shrubs,  and  herbs,  and  most  species  of  seabirds  are 
present.  In  Caroline's  depauperate  flora  there  are  few  species 
left  to  increase  floral  diversity  on  the  larger  islets,  regardless  of 
their  size.  This  is  very  different  from  the  inhabited  atolls  such 
as  Kapingamarangi. 

Although  we  do  not  know  when  true  freshwater  lenses 
develop,  they  may  occur  in  motus  of  this  size  class.  If  we 
assume  that  Pisonia  is  not  salt-tolerant,  limited  fresh  water 
must  be  available  on  motus  as  small  as  0.2  ha.  and  actual 
freshwater  lenses  may  begin  forming  at  around  0.7  ha,  as 
indicated  by  the  sudden  proliferation  of  Pisonia  forest 
(Tables  5,6).  However,  the  Falconers  have  not  been  successful 
in  finding  any  underground  fresh  water  on  Motu  Ana-Ana 
(2. 16  ha),  which  suggests  that  Pisonia  may  be  salt-tolerant. 

d)  Motus  with  Areas  >25.0  ha  (Figs.  30,31;  Tables  5.6): 
On  Caroline,  no  motus  fall  between  22  and  75  ha  in  size.  Thus 
the  three  motus  in  this  category  (Nake.  South,  Long)  cover  a 
limited  range  of  sizes:  75.98  to  107.50  ha.  They  average  18.0 
plant  species.  The  floral  components  and  forest  heights  of 
these  larger  motus  (Figs.  32,33;  Table  5)  are  essentially  the 
same  as  for  class  c.  There  are  no  additional  ecosystems 
( mangrove  swamps,  salt  Hats,  grasslands,  et  cetera )  or  understory 
layers.  Ten  species,  all  rare  or  uncommon,  are  present  only  on 
the  larger  motus  (Table  3):  Scaevola.  Tribulus,  Hibiscus, 
Thespesia,  Ximenia,  Psilotum,  Tacca  (introduced  in  1834), 


24 


Phyllanthus,  Sida,  and  the  dubious  Digitaria.  Four,  possibly  as 
many  as  eight,  are  indigenous.  In  1965,  one  vine  of  the 
indigenous  Ipomoea  pes-caprae  was  also  found,  but  three 
subsequent  surveys  failed  to  locate  it. 

Species-Area  Relationships 

The  relationship  between  the  numbers  of  plant  species  and 
island  size  has  long  fascinated  biologists  (Fosberg,  1949; 
Wiens,  1 962;  MacArthur&  Wilson,  1967;  Whitehead  &  Jones, 
1969),  yet  data  from  uninhabited  islands  is  scant.  The  studies 
from  Kapingamarangi  (Niering,  1956;  Wiens,  1956)  and 
Aitutaki  ( Stoddart  &  Gibbs,  1975 )  treat  atolls  with  long  histories 
of  human  occupancy.  SomeofthevillagesonKapingamarangi's 
23  motus  date  to  1200  A.D.  Aitutaki's  16  uninhabited  motus 
lie  adjacent  to  a  westernized  volcanic  island  in  an  "almost- 
atoll."  People  on  both  these  atolls  have  profoundly  influenced 
their  flora. 

Caroline  provides  an  opportunity  to  compare  the  numbers 
of  species  on  motus  of  different  sizes  in  an  uninhabited  atoll, 
then  to  compare  the  results  with  Kapingamarangi,  Aitutaki, 
and  uninhabited  islands  in  the  Line  and  Phoenix  groups  that 
have  no  introduced  species  and  have  experienced  minimal 
human  contact. 

Comparisons  of  Species-Area  Relationships  with  Other 
Atolls:  Studies  of  Kapingamarangi  (Niering,  1956  (contributed 
greatly  to  theories  of  island  biogeography  (Mac Arthur  & 
Wilson,  1967).  Because  its  motus  coverthe  same  range  of  sizes 
as  Caroline,  the  two  atolls  might  be  expected  to  exhibit  similar 
patterns.  However,  their  species-area  relationships  are 
completely  different.  On  Kapingamarangi,  islets  less  than 
1 .4  ha  showed  a  constant,  small  number  of  species,  after  which 
islets  up  to  100  ha  showed  a  direct  correlation  of  area  with 
numbers  of  species.  On  Caroline,  a  motu  of  1 .4  ha  supports 
almost  two-thirds  of  the  total  number  of  species,  and  plant 
diversity  on  islets  up  to  107  ha  shows  only  a  slight,  but  not 
necessarily  steady,  increase  (Table  5). 

Species-area  relationships  on  the  motus  of  Aitutaki 
(Stoddart  &  Gibbs,  1975,  Figs.  33  and  34  of  that  paper) 
conformed  to  the  Caroline  model;  the  number  of  species 
increased  only  slightly  on  motus  from  4  to  71  ha.  Unfortunately, 
Aitutaki  had  only  one  motu  less  than  1 .4  ha,  so  comparisons  for 
smaller  islets  cannot  be  made.  The  floras  of  all  three  atolls  have 
been  impacted  by  man,  but  Caroline  far  less  so  than  the  others. 
Much  of  the  floral  diversity  on  larger  islets  at  Kapingamarangi 
is  derived  from  plants  introduced  by  man  and  cannot  be 
considered  normal.  Caroline  and  Aitutaki  provide  much  better 
samples  of  natural  plant  species-area  relations  on  atolls. 

Six  islands  in  the  Line  and  Phoenix  groups  (Maiden, 
Starbuck,  McKean,  Phoenix,  Vostok,  Birnie)  are  uninhabited. 
Their  flora  is  entirely  native.  All  are  Caroline's  "neighbors"  in 
an  oceanic  sense,  and  all  except  Vostok  are  dry ,  receiving  about 
750  mm  (30")  of  rain  yearly.  They  are  old,  essentially  filled- 
in  atolls,  containing  hypersaline  central  lagoons  or  no  lagoon 
at  all.  Although  the  largest  island  (Maiden)  has  the  greatest 
diversity,  there  is  only  a  very  small  linear  increase  in  plant 
species  with  increasing  area  (Table  8).  Plant  diversity  is  more 
a  function  of  climate  (hot  and  dry)  and  distance  from  source 
areas,  than  size,  similar  to  the  situation  on  Caroline. 


The  Question  of  Fresh  Water:  The  Kapingamarangi  data 
were  analyzed  with  availability  of  fresh  water  in  mind  (Wiens, 
1962;Whitehead&Jones,  1969).  These  authors  suggested  that 
1 .4  ha  is  the  threshold  at  which  a  freshwater  lens  can  develop. 
Below  this  size  only  halophytes  can  survive.  They  argue  that, 
as  there  are  only  a  limited  number  of  salt-tolerant  species,  the 
floral  composition  on  islets  below  1 .4  ha  is  relatively  constant. 
On  larger  islets,  species  numbers  increase  in  direct  proportion 
to  land  area,  because  permanent  groundwater  promotes  the 
survival  of  an  increasing  variety  of  nonhalophytic  plants. 

The  groundwater  versus  plant  model  does  not  apply  to 
depauperate  Caroline  for  a  number  of  reasons:  first,  the  number 
of  plant  species  is  not  constant  on  islets  below  1.4  ha:  in  fact, 
species  are  added  faster  on  motus  from  0.02  to  1 .4  ha  than  any 
other  size  range. 

Second,  on  Kapingamarangi,  the  number  of  species 
increased  in  direct  relation  to  islet  size  from  1.4  ha  to  100  ha. 
On  Caroline,  species  numbers  increased  only  slightly  from 
1.4  to  22  ha  and  exhibited  another  minor  increase  from  70  to 
108  ha  (see  Fig.  31;  Tables  5,6;  and  Ecological  Succession 
section).  Thus,  Caroline's  data  do  not  support  the  area- 
diversity  theory. 

Third,  Whitehead  &  Jones  (1969)  argued  that  the  flora  on 
"small"  motus  lacking  a  freshwater  lens  (i.e.,  <  1 .4  ha)  consists 
only  of  salt-tolerant  strand  species.  This  is  not  true  on  Caroline 
(Table  6).  In  addition  to  harboring  the  usual  strand  species 
(Tournefortia,  Portulaca,  Laportea,  Heliotropium,  Boerhavia, 
Lepturus),  Caroline' s  "small"  motus  also  support  inland  species 
that  are  generally  considered  nonhalophytic  (Pison ia,  Morinda, 
Achyranthes,  Cordia,  Phymatosorus).  Either  these  latter  five 
species  are  moderately  salt  tolerant,  or  on  Caroline  the  minimum 
islet  size  with  a  freshwater  lens  is  much  less  than  1 .4  ha,  or  both. 

Fourth,  Whitehead  &  Jones  (1969)  postulated  that  the 
nonhalophytic  species  are  those  that  control  overall  species- 
area  associations.  This  may  be  a  good  generalization  for  less 
remote  islands  but  does  not  hold  up  for  atolls  with  depauperate 
floras  (Table  6).  For  example,  on  Caroline  the  halophytic 
Ipomoea  macrantha,  I.  pes-caprae,  Scaevola  sericea,  Sida 
fallax,  Lepidium  bidentatum,  Hibiscus  tiliaceus,  Thespesia 
populnea.  and  Tribidus  cistoides,  which  theoretically  should 
only  occur  as  strand  species  on  the  smaller  islets,  occur  only  on 
larger  islets.  In  addition,  several  nonhalophytes  (e.g.,  Morinda) 
were  found  at  Caroline  on  small  motus  where  one  might  only 
expect  to  find  strand  species. 

Fifth,  the  above  authors  do  not  mention  bird-dispersal  of 
seeds,  which  is  probably  a  factor  that  needs  to  be  taken  into 
account  on  remote  islands:  at  Caroline,  Pisonia  and  Boerhavia 
contribute  to  the  floral  diversity  of  islets  from  0.2  ha  to  108  ha. 

Sixth,  Caroline  does  not  have  an  assemblage  of  nonstrand 
plants  that  only  occur  on  larger  motus;  the  only  naturally 
occurring,  nonstrand  plant  is  Psilotum. 

Seventh,  the  greatest  factor  complicating  our  understanding 
of  Kapingamarangi's  natural  evolutionary  processes  is  the 
presence  of  numerous  exotics:  of  its  98  vascular  plants,  only 
38  (39%)  are  indigenous.  Its  exotics  include  numerous  weedy 
herbs  and  food  plants,  which  occupy  gardens,  abandoned 
house  sites,  taro  patches,  and  plantations  (Cocos,  Pandanus, 
Artocarpus).     These  man-made  habitats  are  particularly 


25 


prevalent  on  larger  islands.  Such  an  abundance  of  exotics,  both 
in  species  and  area  covered,  renders  a  discussion  of  natural 
processes  on  Kapingamarangi  almost  impossible.  Undisturbed 
habitats  such  as  those  on  most  of  Caroline's  motus,  and  on 
other  uninhabited  Pacific  islands  whose  quota  of  indigenous 
plants  exceeds  75%,  provide  far  better  data  on  species-area 
relationships. 

Motu  Size  in  Relation  to  the  Distribution  of  Trees,  Shrubs 
and  Herbs:  As  one  progresses  from  small  to  large  islets 
(Table  5),  the  number  of  tree  species  rises  from  0  to  7,  the 
number  of  shrubs  from  1  to  4,  and  the  number  of  herbs  from 
2  to  12.  Caroline's  trends  are  similar  to  those  at  Aitutaki 
(Stoddart  &  Gibbs,  1975),  where  the  numbers  of  trees  and 
shrubs  are  relatively  constant  over  a  wide  range  of  motu  sizes 
(3.8-7 1  ha),  while  the  number  of  herbs  shows  a  slight  increase. 
There  are  too  many  recent  exotics  on  Kapingamarangi  for 
comparisons  to  be  valid.  We  believe  that  if  Niering's  data  were 
reanalyzed,  using  only  indigenous  species,  similar 
generalizations  would  be  found,  viz.:  most  species  on  atolls 
establish  rapidly  on  small  motus,  after  which  a  few  additions 
occur  on  motus  of  increasing  size  until  the  maximum  number 
of  potentially  available  species  is  reached.  Cursory  examination 
of  Niering's  Fig.  31,  detailing  the  breakdown  of  total  species 
numbers  into  indigenous  and  nonindigenous  components,  bears 
out  this  hypothesis. 

Plant  Communities 

General  Account 

The  total  area  covered  by  vegetation  on  Caroline  is 
357.55  ha,  fully  90%  of  the  combined  areas  of  all  the  motus.  Of 
this,  two-thirds  (289.82  ha)  is  woodland.  Substantial  areas  of 
Caroline's  native  woodlands  and  herb  mats  are  pristine,  and 
85%  (possibly  as  high  as  93%)  of  its  plant  species  are  indigenous. 
Twenty-three  (60%)  of  its  39  motus  harbor  wholly  indigenous 
vegetation  (Figs.  27-30).  Atolls  that  support  substantial  areas 
of  native  forest  are  typically  remote  and  uninhabited.  Where 
people  are  present,  native  vegetation  is  usually  confined  to  the 
smallest  motus  or  the  extremities  of  larger  ones — areas  with 
marginal  human  usefulness. 

Typical  of  atolls,  but  unusual  for  the  tropics,  are  monotypic 
stands  of  shrubs  and  trees.  Caroline  is  rich  in  such  woodlands 
(Figs.  18,22,24.27-30;  Table  9).  The  present  vascular  flora  of 
Caroline,  27  species,  is  organized  into  7  plant  communities 
( 1 1  subcommunities)  defined  principally  by  dominant  species 
(Fosberg,  1953.  1977a).  Eight  subcommunities  are  natural, 
three  are  anthropogenic  (Table  5 ).  The  subcommunities  include 
a  mix  of  dominant  species,  which  are  discussed  in  the  major 
Community  sections  below. 

NATURAL  COMMUNITIES: 
Natural  Herb  Mat 
Toumefortla  Scrub  and  Forest 
Beach  Scrub  with  Suriana 
( 'ordia  Forest 
Paiulamis  forest 
Pisonia  Forest 


ANTHROPOGENIC  COMMUNITY: 
Coconut  Woodlands 

Natural  Herb  Mat  (67.73  ha)  (Figs.  19.23:  Pis.  20.33, 
34.45,46,47) 

Widespread  and  predictable  on  wind-  and  salt-blown 
coastal  coral  rubble  and  incipient  motus,  these  mats  are 
composed  primarily  of  Heliotropium  and  Portulaca.  They  are 
pioneers  on  newly  emergent  motus,  cover  most  of  the  ground 
area  of  small  motus,  extend  inland  along  ancient  reef  channels, 
and  typify  newly  evolving  land  that  connects  or  augments 
established  islets.  Natural  herb  mats  may  persist  through  all 
five  stages  of  plant  succession  as  long  as  sunny  openings  occur. 
Caroline's  motus  illustrate  two  general  principles:  /.  the 
smaller  the  area  of  an  islet,  the  more  extreme  is  the  strand 
character  of  its  vegetation,  and  its  corollary;  2.  as  islet  areas 
enlarge,  strand  flora  becomes  less  important  (Fosberg,  1949). 

The  following  species  are  present  (see  Table  2  for 
abundance  indices): 

Trees:  Morinda  citrifolia  (one  drift  seedling  on  one  motu); 
Shrubs:  Tournefortia  argentea,  Suriana  maritima,  and 
Scaevola  sericea;  and 

Herbs:  Heliotropium  anomalum,  Portulaca  lutea,  Boerhavia 
repens,  Lepturus  repens,  Laportea  ruder  alls,  Lepidium 
bidentatum,  and  Ipomoea  macrantha. 

Near  the  high  water  mark,  the  herb  mats  are  recumbent, 
leathery,  and  somewhat  desiccated.  As  environmental 
conditions  improve  further  inland,  they  spread  more  laterally 
and  average  up  to  7  cm  in  height.  Their  rubbly  habitat,  often 
sprinkled  with  Tournefortia,  resembles  a  low  savannah. 
Although  these  prostrate  herbs  can  tolerate  dazzling  sunshine, 
they  grow  most  vigorously  when  slight  shade,  and  hence  a 
higher  relative  humidity,  is  present.  Under  these  conditions 
they  may  attain  a  height  of  22  cm  and  form  a  fairly  thick  mat. 
With  too  much  shade  the  mats  disappear  or  their  species 
proportions  and  abundance  changes  according  to  the  presence 
or  absence  of  sunny  clearings.  Thus,  natural  herb  mats  may  be 
found  in  patchy  clearings  within  forests  up  to  1 3  m  tall.  They 
are  common  in  the  abandoned  Cocos  plantations  of  South 
Island,  where  Boerhavia  tends  to  proliferate  into  thick  mats 
that  completely  cover  the  substrate,  vying  with  Phymatosorus 
and  Ipomoea  for"lebensraum"  (PI.  34).  A  thick,  exposed  mat 
of  succulent  herbs  is  found  on  Noddy  Rock,  where  Portulaca 
is  the  primary  component. 

Herb  mats  occurred  on  almost  every  transect,  windward 
and  leeward,  ranging  from  1%  to  60%  coverage  (Figs.  19,23). 
The  most  extensive  areas  (coverage  35-50%)  were  on  Skull. 
Tridacna,  South  (Trs.  1.4,6).  Emerald,  and  Mannikiba.  Mats 
predominated  in  sparsely  vegetated  areas.  Their  widths  varied 
according  to  the  age,  shape,  exposure,  and  geographic  position 
of  the  motu  but  were  widest  on  seaward-facing  shores 
(Table  7). 

Wide  bands  of  herb  mats  may  encircle  an  entire  motu:  to 
windward  they  average  36  m  (Table  7),  while,  bordering  the 
relatively  placid  and  intermittently  shaded  lagoon,  they  shrink 
to  a  mere  0.9  m.  On  leeward  motus,  the  corresponding  figures 
are  18.5  m  and  4.2  m. 


26 


Although  reef  flats  are  typically  wider  wherever  an  islet 
turns  sharply,  it  is  not  unexpected  that  these  perimeter  bands 
are  the  most  extensive  on  the  extremely  exposed  shores  of 
northern  Nake(  PI.  17)andsouthernSouthIsland.  On  the  latter, 
they  are  up  to  59  m  wide.  Similarly,  on  small  exposed  motus 
(e.g..  Skull.  Noddy  Rock),  they  carpet  most  of  the  area 
(Fig.  27).  Under  such  conditions,  Portulaca  and  Boerhavia 
develop  much  redder  stems,  possibly  due  to  the  presence  of  a 
chemical  "sunscreen." 

Associations  with  Birds:  Whether  bordering  the  edges  of 
established  islands  or  composing  the  entire  ground  cover  of 
tiny  motus  and  ancient  reef  channels,  herb  mats  are  nesting 
sites  for  red-tailed  tropicbirds,  masked  and  brown  boobies, 
sooty  terns,  and  brown  noddies.  Herb  mats  are  often  used  as 
foraging  grounds  for  shorebirds. 

Beach  Scrub  with  Sunana  ( 1 .49  ha)  (Fig.  20;  Pis.  6,24,39,44) 
Uncommon  on  Caroline,  beach  scrub  with  Suriana  is 
typically  foundon  sandorsandy  rubble  bordering  Tournefortia 
or  Cocos.  On  Caroline,  it  is  evidently  limited  by  the  paucity  of 
low-lying  sand  and  gravel  sheets,  with  which  it  is  normally 
associated  elsewhere  (Fosberg,  1953;  Wiens,  1962;Stoddart& 
Gibbs,  1975). 

The  following  species  are  present  (see  Table  2  for 
abundance  indices): 

Shrubs:   Tournefortia  argentea,  Suriana  maritima;  and 
Herbs:     Heliotropium   anomalum,    Boerhavia   repens, 
Portulaca    lutea,    Laportca    ruderalis,    Phymatosorus 
scolopendria,  and  Lepturus  repens. 

This  plant  community  was  found  on  10  motus  (Fig.  20), 
either  in  thick  bands  or  as  scattered  shrubs.  Suriana  is  most 
robust  on  sandy  substrates,  especially  fringing  the  lower  lagoon 
on  South  Island  (Fig.  36;  Pis.  6,24,39)  and  on  windward 
Tridacna.  The  fringe,  repeatedly  interrupted  by  other  species, 
grows  to  1 2  m  wide  and  1.8  m  high.  Here  the  shrubs  are  closely 
appressed  and  slightly  entangled,  forming  dense  shade,  which 
supports  a  sparse  understory.  On  South,  where  its  roots  are 
submerged  at  high  tide,  it  is  being  shaded  out  by  overhanging 
Cocos  (compare  Pis.  39  and  40),  having  retreated  since  1965. 
Suriana  also  occurs  as  scattered  individuals  or  in  open  bands  in 
coarse  rubble.  Beach  strand  up  to  60  m  wide,  containing  herb 
mats,  Tournefortia,  and  scattered  Suriana,  were  found  on 
South  (Tr.  1,  PI.  21 ).  Long  (Tr.  C),  Brothers.  Matawa,  Long, 
and  the  Southern  Leeward  Islets. 

Pandanus  Forest  (3.38  ha  [this  figure  is  pure  Pandanus  forest. 
Mixed  forests  containing  Pandanus  account  for  a  further 
14.96  ha])  (Fig.  11;  Pis.  18.35-38) 

Although  several  species  of  Pandanus  are  native  to  the 
Line  Islands,  and  their  seeds  are  common  components  of 
Pacific  sea-drift  (Ridley,  1930;  Stone,  1968),  it  is  probable  that 
the  groves  of  P.  tectohus  on  Caroline  represent  both  naturally 
established  forests  and  cultivars  transported  by  early 
Polynesians.  Its  largest  acreages  are  on  two  islands  that 
contained  historical  settlements  (Nake,  South).  However,  its 
presence  within  the  interior  forests  of  a  few  motus  lead  us  to 
conclude  that  it  may  have  experienced  a  dual  introduction.  On 
Emerald  Isle,  3.20  ha  (38%  of  the  islet)  supports  a  mixed  forest 


of  Tournefortia,  Pisonia,  and  Pandanus.  Similarly,  Shark 
Islet's  interior  woodlands  of  Tournefortia,  Pisonia,  and  Cordia 
(5.52  ha,  70%  of  the  islet's  area)  also  contain  a  substantial 
amount  of  Pandanus.  The  only  record  of  habitation  for  these 
motus  was  a  possible  hut  on  Shark.  The  occurrence  of  Pandanus 
groves  or  lone  trees  on  other  islets  (Fig.  1 1 )  is  easily  attributable 
to  drift  seedlings.  Dried  Pandanus  seedpods  are  the  most 
conspicuous  litter  along  Caroline's  lagoon  beaches  (PL  38);  its 
seeds  last  for  months  in  seawater  (Guppy,  1906)  and  are 
probably  distributed  locally  by  rats  and  land  crabs,  as  noted 
elsewhere  (Ridley,  1930).  Carpels  from  Nake's  southern 
mixed  woodlands  undoubtedly  established  the  grove  on 
Pandanus  Islet. 

The  mixed  forest  with  Pandanus  on  south  Nake  (with 
Cocos,  Cordia,  Pisonia,  and  Tournefortia)  contains  up  to  50% 
Pandanus  attaining  heights  of  1 2  m  (Fig.  37).  It  does,  however, 
look  disturbed. 

Many  Pandanus  trees  were  felled  on  South  Island  during 
the  coconut  planting  era  (ca.  1 873- 1 925 ),  as  we  know  that  they 
were  "somewhat  numerous"  in  1834(Bennett,  1840), but  only 
"one  or  more  of  the  screw  pines  were  found  growing  in  various 
parts  of  the  island"  in  1883  (Trelease.  1884).  A  drawing  in  this 
latter  paper  (PI.  50)  depicts  a  grove  from  South  Island  denser 
than  any  remaining  today,  where  Pandanus  is  uncommon  in 
the  beach  scrub  bordering  the  Cocos  plantation. 

Trees  were  fruiting  abundantly  in  September  1988, 
especially  on  Nake.  The  green  phalanges,  17.5-20  cm  in 
diameter,  ripen  to  yellow  and  orange  when  they  fall  to  the 
ground.  They  are  eaten  by  hermit  crabs  (Coenobita  perlatus 
[PI.  381). 

Tournefortia  Scrub  and  Forest  (125.25  ha)  (Figs.  24.34; 
Pis.  5.8,20,30,47.51) 

General  Distribution:  Characteristic  of  many  Pacific 
islands,  Tournefortia,  a  broadleafed  evergreen,  dominates  the 
wooded  motus  of  Caroline,  forming  40%  of  its  total  vegetative 
cover  (Fig.  24).  Its  pale  foliage  and  hemispherical  canopies  (to 
14  m  tall)  typically  surround  the  taller,  darker  canopies  of 
Pisonia  and  Cordia. 

A  hardy  halophyte.  Tournefortia  occurs  on  every  motu 
and  in  every  habitat  except  pure  Pisonia  forest.  It  is  tallest, 
widest,  and  lushest  on  the  windward  motus,  particularly  on 
those  where  Pisonia  is  also  best  developed.  Without  direct  sun 
though,  as  under  dense  Pisonia  or  Cocos,  it  withers  (PI.  24). 

On  other  atolls  Tournefortia  forms  a  narrow  or  interrupted 
belt  inland  of  the  beach  or  is  a  component  of  mixed  scrub 
(Fosberg,  1953).  However,  given  the  floristic  poverty  on 
Caroline,  especially  of  shrubs  and  trees,  Tournefortia  not  only 
has  expanded  into  niches  that  might  elsewhere  be  occupied  by 
combinations  of  Scaevola.  Pemphis,  Suriana.  Terminalia, 
Hernandia,  Thespesia,  Hibiscus,  et  cetera,  but  frequently  occurs 
in  pure  stands  ( 1  13.03  ha)  that  extend  well  inland.  It  thus 
occupies  a  much  higher  percentage  of  the  islet  areas  on  Caroline 
than  on  atolls  with  greater  biodiversity.  For  example,  Nake,  the 
largest  islet,  has  the  greatest  amount  of  Tournefortia  (79.68  ha) 
of  any  islet:  28.9  ha  of  pure  scrub  and  forest,  18.28  ha  of 
"savannah,"  17.48  ha  with  Cordia,  8.99  ha  with  Pisonia,  and 
6.03  ha  mixed  with  Cocos,  Pandanus,  and  Pisonia. 


27 


Overall,  we  classify  Tournefortia  as  a  shrub  (Stoddart  & 
Gibbs,  1975).  However,  following  Mueller-Dombois  et  al. 
( 1 98 1 ,  p.  58),  we  also  distinguish  between  its  shrub  (scrub)  and 
tree  communities.  Because  they  intergrade.  sometimes  we 
lump  them  together  ( vegetation  maps  and  schematic  profiles  of 
the  motus)  and  at  other  times  treat  them  separately 
(Tables  2.5, 1 0  and  ecological  discussions  |: 
/.  Tournefortia  Scrub:  <5  m  high  (x  =  2  m).  <60%  canopy 
coverage  (Pis.  20,30,33,47  (.This  open  scrub  growth  is  typically 
confined  to  islet  perimeters  or  emergent  reef  channels  and 
covers  much  of  the  vegetated  rubble  on  smaller  islets.  Its 
species  composition  is  similar  to  that  of  the  taller  forest,  except 
that  herbs  are  more  prominent. 

2.  Tournefortia  Forest:  >5  m  high  ("x  =  8  m),  >6C7f  canopy 
coverage  (PI.  48).  This  taller,  closed  forest,  with  maximum 
height  1 5  m.  develops  as  a  second  belt  of  woody  vegetation 
approaching  the  interior  of  the  larger  islets.  Figure  34  depicts 
a  schematic  profile  through  pure  Tournefortia  scrub  and  forest, 
while  Fig.  35  diagrams  a  profile  of  a  larger  islet  where 
Tournefortia  is  represented  only  on  its  periphery. 

Species  Diversity  in  Tournefortia  Woodlands:  The 
following  species  occur  in  both  scrub  and  forest.  Those  marked 
"*"  occur  primarily  in  the  scrubland  (Table  2). 
Trees:  Pisonia  grandis,  Morinda  citrifolia,  Pandanus 
tectorius.  Cocas  nucifera,  Cordia  subcordata; 
Shrubs:  Suriana  maritima,  Tournefortia  argentea,  Scaevola 
sericea.  Species  A; 

Herbs:  *Heliotropium  anomalum,  *Boerhavia  repens, 
*Portulaca  lutea,  *Lepturus  repens,  *Laportea  ruderalis, 
*Achyranthes  canescens,  Phymatosorus  scolopendria, 
Ipomoea  macrantha. 

Caroline's  tallest  Tournefortia  stands  (12-15  m)  occur  on 
Nake.  On  all  other  windward  motus,  the  Tournefortia  canopies 
vary  between  6  and  9  m  tall,  shorter  than  expected  if  their 
forests  were  virgin.  This  has  historical  significance:  we  do  not 
know  the  extent  of  forest  felling  (if  any )  on  the  Windward  Islets 
(Crescent  through  Tridacna)  during  the  guano  era,  but  we  do 
know  that  4.587  coconut  palms  were  planted  during  1 9 1 9-20, 
and  that  "misses"  (dead  seedlings)  were  fastidiously  replaced 
over  the  following  2  years  (Young,  ca.  1922).  Thus,  their 
forests,  though  weed-free  today,  comprise  secondary  growth 
around  60  years  old.  It  is  not  surprising  that  Achyranthei 
canescens  and  Lepturus  repens,  both  weedy  (though 
indigenous),  are  particularly  common  inland  on  some  windward 
motus  (Figs.  13.16).  Tournefortia' s  rapid  recovery  illustrates 
that  ecosystems  in  the  pioneer  stage  generally  recover  their 
original  condition  rapidly  when  left  alone  (Fosberg.  19S3). 

Stature  and  Area  Coverage:  Forming  an  umbrellalike 
canopy,  a  typical  Tournefortia  forest  is  very  simple.  Its  twisted 
branches  ami  gnarled  trunks  stretch  about  untidily  over  an  open 
understory.  The  lower  branches  die  off  as  the  trees  increase  in 
stature.  Sometimes  a  scant  coverofherbs  develops  in  restricted 
pockets  of  better  soil,  such  as  a  clearing  where  a  dead  tree  fell, 
a  semishaded  spot  beneath  a  colony  of  seabirds,  or  a  site  where 
a  storm  deposited  a  leu  dead  fish. 

Tournefortia  is  abundant  throughout  the  atoll.  Areas  with 
90-10095  canopy  cover  were  found  on  Nake  (Tr.  4).  Long 
(Trs.  B.C.4.6. 1 0. 1 2 ).  North  Pig,  Pig.  North  Brothers,  Brothers. 


Crescent,  Arundel  (Fig.  34).  Tridacna  (Trs.  1.2).  South 
(Trs.  1,4),  all  5  Southern  Leeward  Islets,  all  Central  Leewards 
over  0.5  ha,  and  Pandanus  Islet.  Tournefortia  is  present  across 
the  entire  width  of  some  small  motus — for  example.  Fishball 
(144  in  wide).  Even  on  larger  motus  such  as  Mannikiba 
(280  m  wide).  Tournefortia  blankets  nearly  all  the  land  ( PI.  70). 
Long  (75.98  ha)  is  a  composite  motu:  long,  narrow,  and 
derived  from  the  coalescence  of  at  least  five  former  islets. 
Because  7barn€/brria  encircled  the  perimeters  of  these  ancient 
islets,  it  is  now  present  in  five  sets  of  concentric  circles. 
connected  by  herb  mats,  down  the  length  of  the  island  ( Fig.  39). 

In  the  herb  mats,  Tournefortia  is  small  (x  =  1.4  m)  and 
widely  scattered  (Table  10).  It  may  be  of  typical  hemispherical 
shape  or  irregularly  windshorn  (Pis.  13.45).  On  windward 
coasts  they  typically  form  a  tight  wind  barrier  one  or  two  trees 
thick.  Moving  inshore  from  the  seaward  fringe,  the  trees 
become  progressively  taller  ( x  =  6  m)  with  a  more  open 
understory.  Cordia  often  mixes  with  Tournefortia,  either  as 
scattered  individuals  in  the  understory  or  canopy,  or  as  small 
groves.  On  the  Southern  Leeward  Islets,  such  belts  border  the 
seaward  scrublands. 

Though  still  widespread  in  the  Pacific.  Tournefortia  is  far 
less  abundant  than  formerly.  On  inhabited  islands  it  exists 
primarily  in  relict  patches  or  as  edging  around  anthropogenic 
forests.  It  rarely  covers  most  of  the  land  area  of  islets:  two 
exceptions  are  TaongK  Marshall  Islands)  and  GaferuK  Caroline 
Islands),  both  in  Micronesia  (Fosberg.  1956:  Wiens.  1962). 
The  finest  quality  Tournefortia  forests  on  Caroline  Atoll  (15m, 
80%  cover)  occupy  central  and  northern  Nake  (Fig.  37);  given 
Caroline's  history  of  occupation,  these  could  well  be  virgin. 
These  15-m  Tournefortia  compare  favorably  with  18-m 
specimens  found  at  Jemo  Island  by  Fosberg  ( 1956).  Perhaps 
Jemo's  trees  are  at  the  upper  size  limit  for  the  species,  as 
Tournefortia  is  generally  recorded  as  3  to  6  m  tall  (Wiens. 
1962). 

Ecology:  Tournefortia  is  an  integral  part  of  the  atoll's 
evolution  and  ecology.  Bearing  seeds  capable  of  floating  for  at 
least  4  months  in  the  sea  (Guppy,  1906),  it  is  the  first  woody 
plant  to  establish  on  tiny  motus  (<0. 1  ha),  appearing  immediately 
after  the  native  herbs  have  begun  to  germinate  in  the  coarse 
coral  rubble.  Requiring  little  or  no  soil  and  adequate  rainfall, 
it  can  grow  up  to  2  m  a  year  (Fosberg.  1959).  Tournefortia' s 
leaves  contribute  to  soil  development,  paving  the  way  for  plant 
succession  from  Stages  I  through  IV.  for  it  only  persists  in  soils 
that  are  conducive  to  the  growth  of  its  mesophytic  competitors 
(Fosberg.  1953).  The  most  mature  trees  (x  =  9.5  m)  occur  at  the 
Tournefortia— Pisonia  interface,  but  die  off  as  Pisonia  expands. 
When  Tournefortia  has  reached  its  maximum  height,  most  of 
its  lower  branches  have  fallen,  leafage  is  reduced,  and  flowers 
and  fruits  are  few.  Tournefortia  usually  drops  out  after  one 
generation.  Seedlings  are  rarely  seen  in  heavy  shade,  and  fallen 
trees  are  fairly  common  on  the  edge  of  the  interior  forests  where 
Pisonia  replaces  it. 

An  example  of  complete  replacement  of  Tournefortia  by 
Pisonia  is  illustrated  by  nearby  Vostok.  It  has  heretofore  been 
assumed  that  Vostok's  sole  tree  species  was  Pisonia  grandis 
(Fosberg.  1936:  Bryan.  1942:  Clapp&  Sibley,  1971b; Garnett, 
1983).  However,  Young  (ca.  1922)  stated  that  when  Captain. I. 


28 


Larsen.  of  the  schooner  Papeete,  planted  1 00  coconuts  there  on 
3 1  May  1922.  he  found  "Pukatea  and  Tauhinu  trees,  et  cetera 
60  to  80  feet  high;"  that  is,  Pisonia  grandis  and  Toumefortia 
argentea,  but  no  "Tou"  trees  (Cordia  subcordata).  By  1935 
only  Pisonia  remained  (Fosberg,  1936);  thus,  the  last  natural 
Toumefortia  must  have  been  eliminated  by  Pisonia. 

Along  some  coasts  (Long,  Nake,  South).  Toumefortia 
overhangs  the  water,  its  roots  immersed  at  high  tide.  We  found 
floating  debris  up  to  20  m  inland  within  dense  Toumefortia 
forest,  indicating  that  this  hardy  shrub  can  withstand  periodic 
storms  and  high  tides.  If  a  rosette  of  Toumefortia  leaves  is 
placed  in  fresh  water,  it  droops  within  an  hour,  indicating  that 
its  tissues  require  a  high  salt  concentration  in  order  to  maintain 
turgidity  (personal  observation).  Perhaps  decreased  salinity  in 
the  ground  water,  coupled  with  reduced  light  intensity  in 
advanced  serai  stages,  contribute  to  the  eventual  disappearance 
of  Toumefortia  in  the  center  of  coral  islands. 

Associations  with  Birds:  Toumefortia  is  a  favored  roosting 
and  breeding  site  for  most  of  Caroline's  seabirds.  The  taller  the 
trees,  the  greater  the  bird  diversity  they  harbor:  scrub  contained 
four  species  (36%)  and  forest,  nine  (82%).  Sooty  terns  nest  in 
tight  colonies  in  its  shade,  its  canopies  support  large  populations 
of  red-footed  boobies  (PI.  51)  and  great  frigatebirds 
(Subchapter  1.2,  this  volume),  and  its  branches  are  favored  by 
white  terns  (Figs.  34-36).  Toumefortia  leaves  provide  nesting 
material  for  noddies. 

Cordia  Forest  (1.39  ha)  (Fig.  22;  PI.  27) 

General  Distribution:  Cordia  does  not  form  "the  main 
native  woodland"  on  Caroline  Atoll,  as  implied  by  Clapp  & 
Sibley  ( 197  la)  and  stated  by  Stoddart  &  Gibbs  (1975,  p.  104). 
It  occupies  far  less  area  than  Toumefortia  or  Pisonia  (Table  9). 
Cordia  is  generally  mixed  with  other  emergents:  monotypic 
Cordia  forest  covers  only  1.39  ha,  while  Toumefortia  or 
Pisonia  containing  substantial  amounts  of  Cordia  total 
25 .89  ha.  In  toto.  this  is  less  than  1 0%  of  Caroline' s  woodlands, 
and  Cordia  is  usually  subdominant.  We  treat  Cordia  forest  as 
a  separate  plant  community  because  of  its  increasing  rarity  on 
Pacific  atolls,  which  makes  Caroline's  groves  an  increasingly 
important  resource  in  need  of  conservation.  Cordia  forest 
occurs  primarily  on  Nake,  Windward.  Crescent,  North  Pig, 
Pig,  Danger,  Shark,  and  the  Southern  Leeward  Islets. 

History:  Bennett  (1840)  recorded  "two  species  of 
Toumefortia"  on  Caroline,  possibly  referring  to  Toumefortia 
and  Cordia.  There  are  no  other  19th-century  records.  From 
Cordia 's  present  distribution  we  can  infer  that  it  was  formerly 
more  extensive  on  South  and  Nake.  Scattered  trees  within  and 
bordering  the  Coeos  plantations  suggest  that  its  history  is 
similar  to  the  species  on  Flint:  both  Flint  and  Caroline  were 
worked  simultaneously  by  the  same  companies  for  guano 
( 1872-1890)  and  copra  (into  the  193()'s).  Pisonia  and  Cordia 
forests  were  felled  to  make  room  for  coconuts.  Several 
hundred  Cordia  logs  were  exported  from  Flint  to  San  Francisco 
to  be  used  for  furniture.  The  last  logs  were  exported  in  1896, 
6  years  after  the  guano  supplies  were  depleted,  but  coconuts 
were  still  being  planted  (Young,  ca.  1922).  Today,  the  belt  of 
indigenous  vegetation  bordering  Flint's  coconut  plantation 
still  has  many  large  Cordia  trees  (Kepler,   1990b),  unlike 


Caroline,  where  today  Cordia  is  rare  on  South  Island.  However, 
some  of  Flint's  Cordia  trees  today  may  well  be  those  "few  tiny, 
struggling. ..trees. ..recently  planted"  (St.  John  &  Fosberg,  1937). 

Abundance  and  Distribution:  Cordia  seeds  are  dispersed 
by  ocean  currents  and  can  germinate  after  40  days  in  seawater 
(Guppy.  1906).  Requiring  the  presence  of  other  species 
(Fosberg,  1953),  on  Caroline  it  develops  both  as  an  understory 
shrub  and  forest  emergent  (to  15  m  high).  It  typically  occupies 
the  woodland  periphery,  occurring  in  small  circular  or  linear 
groves,  or  mixing  with  Toumefortia  and/or  Pisonia  (Table  5). 
On  many  other  Pacific  atolls  Cordia  forms  a  mixed  scrub  with 
Scaevola  (Fosberg,  1949).  Cordia  may  form  tall,  straight- 
trunked  trees  (PI.  27)  or  sprawl  like  Hibiscus  tiliaceus.  In  dry 
rubble  sites  it  may  become  chlorotic  ( PI.  79 )  or  semideciduous. 
The  tallest  groves  are  on  Pig  (PI.  27),  where  six  trees  averaged 
12.6  m  tall,  1 16  cm  circumference  at  1.5  m  high,  and  99.8  cm 
around  the  trunk  base.  Lush  Cordia  groves  sheltered  parts  of 
the  upper  lagoon  on  Long  Island  (Tr.  10). 

Flowering  times  are  unpredictable:  In  November  1989, 
flowers  were  abundant,  extending  through  March,  yet  in 
November  1990  not  one  flower  was  observed  (Anne  Falconer 
and  AK.K,  personal  observation).  Two  flowers  were  seen  in 
September  1988  (personal  observation). 

Associations  with  Birds:  Black  and  brown  noddies, 
frigatebirds,  and  white  terns  nest  in  Cordia  wherever  it  is  a 
forest  component.  Great  frigatebirds  and  red-footed  boobies 
favor  roosting  in  the  lush,  lagoonside  forest  of  Cordia  and 
Pisonia  near  the  south  end  of  Long  Island. 

Pisonia  Forest  (62.17  ha)  (Figs.  18,32,33,35,39,41; 
Pis.  43,52,53;  Tables  11-14) 

General  Distribution:  Although  Pisonia  grandis  is  recorded 
as  "present"  in  the  two  previous  scientific  accounts  of  Caroline 
(Trelease,  1884;  Clapp  &  Sibley,  197  la),  the  quality  and  extent 
of  its  forests  has  not  been  recognized.  Some  stands  on  this  atoll 
are  outstanding  representatives  of  a  major  ecosystem  that  was 
formerly  far  more  widespread  in  the  Pacific. 

Common  throughout  the  atoll,  Pisonia  occurs  on  29  motus. 
Well  developed  groves,  10-21  m  tall  and  up  to  359  cm 
circumference  at  1.5  m,  are  present  on  23  of  these  (Table  1 1 ). 
Although  present  on  motus  less  than  one  hectare  in  size 
(Table  5).  it  typically  occupies  interior  forests  (schematic 
profile.  Fig.  35),  with  individual  trees  or  groves  contributing 
from  5%  to  100%  of  the  canopy.  In  general,  Caroline's 
windward  motus  support  the  lushest  forests:  the  maximum 
height  of  windward  Pisonia  forests  is  2 1  m;  of  leeward  forests, 
15  m. 

Mature  Pisonia  forests  are  monocultures  of  grandeur.  The 
trees  bear  one  to  several  stout  boles  of  irregular  shape,  whose 
rotting  cavities  often  harbor  large  coconut  crabs  or  miniponds 
alive  with  mosquito  larvae.  Their  scraggly  branches 
occasionally  bend  over  and  reroot.  It  is  dark  and  humid  after 
the  glare  of  the  beach.  Walking  is  easy  because  the  forest  floor 
is  open  except  for  exposed  roots  and  a  scattering  of  broken 
branches.  Few  seedlings  occur.  Overhead,  aconstant  cacophony 
of  bird  calls  overwhelms  the  sound  of  the  trade  winds,  and 
guano  spills  everywhere.  Polynesian  rats  scurry  underfoot.  It 
is  a  curious  habitat  for  a  tropical  island. 


29 


In  September  1988  we  saw  no  flowers  or  fruit.  Anne 
Falconer  reported  flowers  on  Motu  Ana- Ana  in  August  1990. 
Pisonia  was  beginning  to  bloom  on  Vostok  in  March  1990 
(A.  Kepler,  in  prep.). 

A  Historical  Perspective:  Some  of  Caroline's  most  mature 
Pisonia  groves  (to  21  m  tall,  660  cm  circumference  at  1.5  m. 
multiple  trunks)  appear  to  be  virgin.  Overall  dimensions  of  the 
trees,  low  species  diversity,  and  general  character  of  the  plant 
community  are  similar  to  the  known  virgin  groves  on  Vostok 
(personal  observation,  Table  12).  We  do  not  have  dimensional 
data  (other  than  height)  of  these  particular  areas  on  Nake,  but 
their  level  of  maturity  can  be  seen  in  PI.  43. 

Despite  the  advanced  stage  of  ecological  succession  of 
many  groves,  especially  to  windward,  planting  records  from 
1916-1922  indicate  that  Cocos  was  planted  throughout,  not 
only  South,  but  also  on  Nake.  Long,  and  all  the  major  Windward 
Islets  (Young,  ca.  1922).  Given  the  standard  planting  density 
of  one  tree  every  8.5  nr  (28  x  28  ft)  ( Young,  ca.  1922),  we  have 
calculated  the  approximate  area  on  each  islet  given  over  to 
Cocos  plantations,  based  on  the  number  of  coconuts  planted 
(Table  13)  times  the  area  required  for  each  tree  (73  nr).  We 
have  then  compared  this  to  the  usable  areas  based  on  today's 
forest  cover.  On  all  nine  Windward  Islets,  Cocos  covered 
79  to  100%  of  usable  ground;  in  several  cases  the  amount 
calculated  for  Cocos  exceeds  the  amount  of  potentially  usable 
ground.  Thus,  Cocos  was  so  intensively  cultivated  on  the 
Windward  Islets  that  essentially  all  the  Pisonia  and  most 
Toumefortia  forests  must  have  been  felled. 

Two  remarkable  points  emerge  from  Table  13:  1.  Scarcely 
any  Cocos  remains  today  on  the  nine  Windward  Islets;  seven 
of  them  bear  no  trace  of  the  former  plantations 
(Figs.  43,44,47,48);  and  2.  recovery  of  Caroline's  natural 
ecosystems.  Stages  I  through  V  ( Ecological  Succession  section ). 
on  the  windward  side  has  been  rapid  and,  at  least  on  Brothers 
Islet  (Fig.  46),  reasonably  complete  with  regard  to  ecological 
succession  and  species  diversity.  Today  the  Windward  Islets 
have  the  lushest  and  tallest  plant  communities,  with  higher 
species  diversity  than  the  leeward  islets  (Table  3).  which  have 
evidently  experienced  far  less  human  disturbance. 

This  differential  disturbance  on  the  w  indward  and  leeward 
sides  of  the  atoll  explains  enigmas  such  as  20-m-tall  Pisonia 
forest  on  the  leeward  Booby  Islet  (0.84  ha),  taller  than  most  of 
the  windward  forests;  the  absence  of  Pisonia  on  windward 
Tridacna  Islet  (9.08  ha),  which,  being  close  to  South  Island, 
probably  supported  Cocos,  which  was  managed  longer  than  the 
more  distant  windward  islets;  and  the  patchy  distribution  of 
Pisonia  in  the  interiorof  several  islets  (e.g..  Windward,  Arundel). 
This  last  point  also  applies  to  Mannikiba  ( 2 1 .49  ha),  the  largest 
leeward  islet.  According  to  Young  (ca.  1922),  6,000  seed  sets 
were  brought  from  Flint  to  Caroline  in  1920  and  kept  on 
Mannikiba.  This  "nursery  stock"  was  used  to  replant  "misses" 
on  other  islets,  due  mostly  to  destruction  by  coconut  crabs  and 
poor  planting.  Today.  Mannikiba's  total  acreage  of  Pisonia 
(Fig.  53)  is  very  small  and  fragmented  relative  to  the  islet's 
si/e:  1.13  ha.  5'<  of  the  total  land  area.  Compare  this  with  Bird 
Islet  (Fig.  55).  which,  as  far  as  we  know,  has  never  been 
disturbed:    1.70  ha  Pisonia,  42'  i  of  the  islet's  land  area. 


On  both  Caroline  and  Flint  there  is  much  variation  in  the 
quality  of  the  regenerated  Pisonia  forests  (Table  12).  Some 
trees  bear  enormous,  partly  rotting  boles,  black  algae  smothering 
the  bark,  multiple  trunks,  and  few  or  no  understory  herbs. 
Other  trees  are  tall  and  straight-trunked,  with  characteristic 
whitish  bark,  and  bear  no  rotting  holes  in  their  bases.  Such 
observations  suggest  that  when  their  indigenous  forests  were 
felled,  only  minimal  cutting  was  done,  and  many  Pisonias  were 
able  to  regenerate  quickly  by  sprouting  from  rooted  stumps  and 
fallen  branches.  This  speculation  is  supported  by  the  fact  that 
some  of  Vostok's  Pisonia  trees  regenerated  similarly.  Maude 
(1953,  p.  96)  stated  that  "there  is  room  for  8,000  palms  on 
Vostok,  but  only  100  have  been  planted  and  most  of  these  have 
been  choked  in  the  luxuriant  'buka'  (Pisonia  grandis)  forest: 
no  attempt  having  been  made  to  exploit  the  island  since  the 
initial  planting." 

Pisonia,  a  soft,  pulpy  wood,  has  a  well-known  ability  to 
sprout  or  send  up  suckers  from  dismembered  branches  or  fallen 
trunks  ( Fosberg,  1 953),  and  it  has  been  noted  that  older  trees  are 
virtually  indestructible,  fire  being  the  only  effective  means  of 
clearing  forests  (Wiens,  1962,  p.  397).  The  senior  author  has 
photographed  leaf  sprouts  from  partly  burned  twigs  as  small  as 
1  m  long  and  5  to  6  cm  in  diameter. 

Since  the  existing  Cocos  plantations  on  South  Island  and 
southwest  Nake  contain  few  Pisonias,  it  seems  that  forest 
clearing  was  more  thorough  on  the  atoll's  larger  islets  than  on 
the  smaller  ones,  which  today  manifest  scant  traces  of  their 
former  history.  Fortunately  for  Caroline,  its  coconut  plantations 
were  plagued  by  a  number  of  problems,  which  resulted  in  their 
being  abandoned  twice:  coconut  crabs,  seabirds,  rats, 
Ipomoea  vines,  and  an  unknown  disease  (see  under  Coconut 
Woodlands,  this  section). 

A  footnote  in  Young  (ca.  1922, p.  15)  stated  that  "the  larger 
portion  of  the  30,000  trees  planted  were  either  badly  planted  or 
smitten  with  some  disease  as  in  1927  it  was  reported  by 
Mr.  Bunckley  that  most  of  them  had  perished."  In  1929  only 
1 3,2 1 5  trees  were  left  and  more  were  being  planted.  Considering 
the  distribution  of  both  palms  and  natural  forests  today,  it 
appears  that  plantations  continued  on  South  and  Nake  and  were 
abandoned  on  the  smaller  islets,  allowing  for  a  better  recovery 
than  might  be  expected  had  the  Cocos  grown  to  maturity. 

Once  a  Cocos  plantation  has  been  well  established  and 
subsequently  abandoned,  Pisonia  regrowth  is  more  difficult. 
This  is  characteristic  of  mans  islands  in  the  tropics.  For 
example,  on  Cousin  Island  (an  ICBP  wildlife  preserve  since 
1968,  Seychelles  Islands.  Indian  Ocean),  where  Pisonia  is 
currently  reestablishing  within  adeterioratingCf)cc.v  plantation, 
Phillips  &  Phillips  ( 1990.  p.  37)  envisioned  "centuries  rather 
than  decades  before  something  like  a  natural  ecosystem 
develops."  We  predict  a  similar  time  frame  for  areas  on 
Caroline  and  Flint  where  Cocos  canopy  is  over  7095  cover. 

Annual  Growth  Rates:  Data  on  Pisonia  grandis  growth 
rales  are  evidently  lacking.  On  Cousin  Island,  vegetation 
changes,  including  Pisonia  and  Cocos,  have  been  monitored 
since  1 474  (Phillips.  1984;  Phillips  &  Phillips.  1990).  However. 
as  in)  measurements  of  any  tree  dimensions  are  included, 
growth  rates  cannot  be  deduced. 


30 


Because  of  this  paucity  of  data  on  Pisonia,  and  because  its 
forests  have  diminished  significantly  on  coral  islands  this 
century,  we  are  presenting  our  data  from  Caroline,  with 
comparisons  with  Vostok  and  Flint,  in  the  hopes  that  it  might 
inspire  more  research. 

One  point  is  clear:  on  all  three  of  the  Southern  Line 
Islands,  Pisonia  grandis  has  recovered  fast  from  disturbance 
(except  for  total  forest  elimination),  reaching  close  to  its 
maximum  height  and  ecological  maturity  in  70  years  or  less. 
Mature  Pisonia,  under  optimal  conditions  of  soil,  temperature, 
and  rainfall,  may  attain  35  m,  as  on  Fanning  and  Washington 
(Garnett,  1983  and  personal  communication).  However,  in  the 
Southern  Line  Islands,  canopies  of  similarly  virgin  Pisonia  on 
Vostok  rarely  exceed  25-30  m  tall  (Kepler,  1990c). 

Caroline's  prime  grove — 21  m  tall,  with  circumferences 
(at  1.5  m)  to  660  cm,  and  bearing  multiple  trunks  and  root 
suckers — we  now  know  date  back  only  to  the  1920's.  They 
have  thus  averaged  a  growth  rate  of  0.32  m  per  year  since,  say, 
1925  (65  years).  Growth  was  undoubtedly  fastest  during  the 
first  few  years. 

Further  evidence  of  fast  growth  rates  is  provided  from 
Flint  Island.  In  1934  only  one  small  Pisonia  was  recorded 
(St.  John&Fosberg,  1937).  Fosberg( personal  communication) 
recalled  that  only  scant  traces  of  native  vegetation  existed  at  the 
time,  virtually  the  entire  island  (324  ha)  being  planted  with 
Cocos.  In  1990,  transect  surveys  (Kepler,  1990b,d),  coupled 
with  an  analysis  of  aerial  photographs,  revealed  that  single  to 
multi-trunked  Pisonia  trees,  now  quite  common  on  the  windward 
side  of  Flint,  attained  maximum  heights  of  30  m,  having 
circumferences  at  the  base  and  at  1 .5  m  of  1 ,000  cm  and  200  cm, 
respectively  (Table  12).  These  compare  favorably  with  one 
large  Pisonia,  presumably  virgin,  measured  on  Atafu  Island 
(Tokelau)  by  the  US  Exploring  Expedition  in  1 840,  which  was 
more  than  600  cm  in  circumference  at  its  base  and  about  12  m 
tall  (Wilkes,  1845,  Vol.  V,  p.  9).  Furthermore,  indigenous 
forests  (Pisonia,  Cordia,  Guettarda),  with  canopies  of 
4  to  >20  m,  covered  57  ha,  28%  of  Flint' s  vegetated  area.  Thus, 
numerous  Pisonias  have  not  only  established  themselves  since 
the  plantation  was  abandoned  in  the  late  1930's  but  have 
averaged  approximately  0.5  m  growth  per  year.  This  faster 
growth  rate  than  on  Caroline  may  be  due  to  Flint's  higher 
rainfall  and  greater  relative  humidity  due  to  the  presence  of  a 
more  successful  coconut  plantation  inland:  Caroline's  annual 
output  of  copra  was  15  tons,  compared  to  230  tons  for  Flint 
(Young,  ca.  1922;  Maude,  1953). 

Species  Diversity  in  Pisonia  Forests:  Caroline's  motus 
harbor  every  stage  in  the  development  of  a  Pisonia  forest,  from 
stately  monoty  pic  groves  to  a  single  tree.  The  plant  communities 
between  these  extremes  harbor  the  greatest  species  diversity 
and  most  luxuriant  growth  on  the  atoll.  The  following  species 
are  present  (Table  2): 

Trees:     Morinda  citrifolia,   Cordia  subcordata,   Cocos 
nucifera,  Pandamis  tectorius,  Pisonia  grandis; 
Shrubs:   Tournefortia  argentea;  and 

Herbs:  Boerhavia  repens,  Portulaca  lutea,  Laportea 
ruderalis,  Lepturus  repens,  Achyranthes  canescens, 
Phymatosorus  scolopendria,  and  Ipomoea  macrantha. 


The  number  of  species  within  Pisonia  forests  ranges  from 
1  to  14  (Table  14).  As  Pisonia  becomes  more  dominant,  their 
trees  are  taller  (21  m),  and  species  diversity  is  less  (Table  14). 
Here,  the  average  number  of  species  is  3.4.  Species  diversity 
is  also  very  low  at  the  other  extreme  of  Pisonia  development: 
in  one  young  motu  (Azure),  only  a  single  6-m-tall  Pisonia  tree 
is  present  (x  =  4.0  m).  The  smallest  islet  on  which  we  found 
Pisonia,  Azure  is  only  0.20  ha  in  area  and  77  m  wide  (Fig.  55, 
PI.  53);  more  than  half  of  it  is  rubble.  The  width  of  its  scrub  is 
only  38  m.  Along  a  transect  within  the  majestic  Pisonia  grove 
( 100%  canopy  cover)  on  Brothers  (Fig.  46),  we  found  no  other 
plant  species,  an  extreme  case  of  the  barrenness  of  Pisonia 
understory.  This  grove,  13mtallandextending42mfromeast 
to  west,  was  sharply  delineated  from  the  6-m-high  Tournefortia 
forests  on  both  sides  and  provides  a  striking  example  of 
complete  ecological  succession  since  its  Cocos  plantation  days 
of  the  1920's. 

The  highest  species  diversity  occurred  with  mixed  co- 
dominants  (Tournefortia,  Cordia),  and  Pisonia  coverage 
25-50%  (Table  14).  Here,  the  average  number  of  species  was 
6.2  (range  3-10).  Regardless  of  the  area  or  width  of  the  motu 
on  which  they  occurred,  these  mixed  stands  (x  =  7  m  tall)  were 
always  shorter  than  pure  Pisonia  forest. 

Ecology:  On  Caroline,  most  plant  species  are  established 
early  in  the  evolution  of  individual  motus,  increasing 
in  abundance  and  stature  while  the  motus  are  quite  small. 
Pisonia  typifies  this  pattern:  single  trees  occur  on  2  motus 
whose  areas  are  only  0.2  ha  (Table  6).  This  suggests  that 
Pisonia  is  partly  salt-tolerant,  at  least  in  its  early  growth  stages. 
In  general,  however,  motus  less  than  0.7  ha  on  Caroline  have 
little  Pisonia  (Table  6).  It  is  difficult  to  imagine  a  freshwater 
lens  on  Motu  Nautonga  (1  ha),  where  an  11-m-tall  Pisonia 
forest  is  found  (Table  1 1).  Further  evidence  for  the  salt-tolerant 
nature  of  Pisonia  comes  from  Vostok,  where  a  Pisonia 
forest,  the  sole  woodland,  extends  to  the  edge  of  the  shoreline 
rubble  and  herb  mat.  The  trees,  tightly  pruned  by  wind  and  salt, 
have  no  buffer  of  coastal  scrub.  During  storms,  seawater 
reaches  Vostok' s  interior  forest,  yet  this  24-ha  island  supports 
one  of  the  largest  and  tallest  (25  m  high)  groves  in  the  Pacific 
(Clapp  &  Sibley,  1971b;  Fosberg,  1977b  and  personal 
observation). 

Many  Pisonia  trees  were  heavily  infested  with  scale 
insects  (Coccidae)  and  Neuropteran  larvae  (Chrysopa  sp.), 
identified  by  Dr.  Scott  Miller  (Bishop  Museum,  Honolulu, 
Hawaii).  This  appears  to  be  a  natural  phenomenon,  as  they 
were  also  abundant  on  the  virgin  Pisonia  forests  on  Vostok  and 
also  on  secondary  Pisonias  at  Flint. 

Relationships  Between  Pisonia  Forest  Height  and  Motu 
Dimensions:  Contrary  to  expectations,  the  tallest,  most  mature 
forests  did  not  all  occur  on  the  largest  motus  (Table  1 1 ).  The 
three  prime  forests  (90-100%  canopy  cover)  are  on  Nake 
(107.46  ha),  Pig  (7.21  ha),  and  Booby  (0.84  ha).  Trees  on 
Booby  are  smaller  in  girth  than  those  on  Nake  and  Pig,  but  their 
height  (20  m)  is  impressive;  as  far  as  we  know,  Booby  was 
never  cleared.  Fine  forests  occur  on  other  small,  undisturbed 
motus;  for  example,  Pisonia  grew  to  14  m  on  Raurau  (3.48  ha) 
and  to  1 1  m  on  Kimoa  ( 1 .80  ha). 


31 


A  positive  correlation  exists  between  Pisonia  height  and 
island  width  (Fig.  32).  On  Caroline,  motus  were  90  m  wide 
before  closed  canopies  of  13  m  developed  (Fig.  32),  and  tree 
height  increased  to  21  m  with  islet  width  up  to  200  m  (Pig, 
topmost  star  in  Fig.  32 ).  Further  increases  in  islet  width  did  not 
result  in  taller  trees.  However,  even  on  motus  with  sufficient 
w  idth,  Pisonia  did  not  develop  unless  other  environmental 
conditions  were  suitable.  For  example,  on  Long,  Pisonia  only 
occurred  in  the  centers  of  its  former  islets,  not  in  the  scrubby 
areas  where  coalescence  is  more  recent.  Tridacna.  seemingly 
excellent  for  Pisonia,  has  not  yet  recovered  from  its  Cocos 
plantations. 

Pisonia-Seabud  Relationships:  Seabirds  are  an  integral 
part  of  Pisonia  ecology.  Its  sticky  seed  capsules  adhere  to  the 
feathers  of,  and  are  thus  dispersed  by,  seabirds  such  as  terns, 
boobies,  and  frigatebirds;  thus,  its  early  appearance  on  small 
motus  is  not  surprising. 

On  Caroline,  six  species  of  seabirds  nest  in  its  branches, 
dropping  considerable  guano  to  the  ground  below.  Black 
noddies,  amassing  in  dense  colonies,  nest  almost  exclusively  in 
Pisonia,  along  with  brown  noddies,  white  terns,  great  and 
lesser  frigatebirds,  and  red-footed  boobies.  Pig  Islet,  with 
7.25  ha  of  excellent  Pisonia  forest,  supported  a  dense  colony  of 
nearly  2,000  pairs  of  black  noddies  (Subchapter  1.2.  this 
volume).  Bristle-thighed  curlews  feed  on  the  ground  beneath 
its  open  understory.  and  the  long-tailed  cuckoo  forages  within 
ils  canopy. 

Seabirds  may  be  so  much  a  part  of  Pisonia  ecology  that  a 
debate  exists  as  to  whether  Pisonia  actually  requires  guano  for 
successful  germination  and  establishment  of  seedlings  (Shaw, 
1952;  Fosberg.  1953;Wiens.  1962).  Very  high  phosphate  and 
nitrogen  levels  arc  associated  with  mature  Pisonia,  and 
concurrently  the  development  of  Pisonia  forest  results  in 
great!)  modified  soils  that  perpetuate  its  existence  (Wiens, 
1962;  Spicer  &  Newbery.  1979).  The  formation  of  a  highly 
acid  raw  humus  on  the  surface  of  the  ground,  sometimes  in 
association  with  phosphatic  hardpan.  has  also  been  documented 
on  several  atolls  by  Fosberg  ( 1953.  1956).  including  Vostok 
(AKK  and  John  Phillips,  personal  observation).  Perhaps 
Pisonia's  present  distribution,  primarily  restricted  to  uninhabited 
islands  ( Shaw,  1 952;  Wiens.  1 962  l.isin  part  due  to  the  fact  that 
its  primary  seed  carriers,  seabirds.  rarely  coexist  for  long  with 
num. 

Remnant  Pisonia  Forests  in  the  Pacific:  Though  naturally 
and  widely  distributed  from  the  western  Indian  Ocean  to  the 
eastern  Pacific  (excluding  Hawaii),  Pisonia grandis  has  become 
increasingly  rare  this  century  (Fosberg.  1953  and  personal 
i  ommunication).  Occupying  the  interior  of  most  atolls,  it  may 
have  formerly  covered  the  greatest  area  of  any  tree  species  in 
the  Pacific  (Wiens,  1962).  Shaw  (1952),  summarizing  its 
distribution,  stated  that  it  only  occurs  on  remote,  generally 
uninhabited  islands  ranging  from  the  western  Indian  Ocean  to 
the  eastern  Pacific,  including  Malaysia.  However,  more  recent 
studies,  particularly  bv  Fosberg,  indicate  that  because  its  habitat 
occupies,  and  is  in  part  responsible  for.  the  most  fertile  areas  of 
inhabited  islands,  its  formerly  extensive  forests  have  been 
largely  replaced  by  coconuts.  Though  Pisonia's  soli  wood  is 


of  little  use  to  either  atoll  inhabitants  or  to  the  timber  industry, 
its  soils  were  rich  sources  of  phosphate  fertilizer  and  w  ere  thus 
greatly  disturbed  during  the  guano  mining  era. 

One  of  the  most  extensive  Pisonia  stands  in  the  Pacific 
( 1 3.5  ha  on  Vostok)  was  partly  burned  in  1977  by  members  of 
a  "scientific  expedition"  (Fosberg.  1977b).  The  Royal  New 
Zealand  Air  Force  found  it  smoldering  3  months  later  (Fosberg, 
1977b,  personal  communication).  In  a  March  1990  visit  to 
Vostok,  we  found  that  approximately  1.5  ha  were  completely 
cleared  ( Kepler.  1 990c ),  and  a  further  unknown  amount  of  land 
was  affected.  Other  excellent  groves  exist  on  Palmyra  and 
Washington  (northern  Line  Group  land  on  Nikumarorol  Phoenix 
Group).  Flint  (Southern  Line  Group);  Christmas  (northern 
Line  Group);  Bikar,  Jemo,  and  Ujae  (Marshall  Islands):  and 
Aitutaki,  Penrhyn.  Suwarrow,  and  Manihiki  (Cook  Islands) 
have  relatively  small  stands.  Caroline,  with  62.73  ha  in  Pisonia 
forest  (36.94  ha  in  monotypic  groves)  holds  some  of  the  finest 
representatives  of  this  ecosystem  in  the  Pacific,  even  though 
much  of  it  is  not  virgin. 

Coconut  Woodlands  (96.14  ha)  (Figs.  14.36:  Pis.  18.23.24. 
28-30.33.34.37.39.40.44) 

General  Distribution:  Cocos.  although  present  on  15 
motus  and  known  historically  from  another  4.  covers  significant 
areas  only  on  Caroline's  2  largest  islets.  South  and  Nake 
(Table  13).  Individual  trees  and  small  groves  elsewhere  are 
drift-derived  or  remnants  of  plantings  made  from  1916-1 920. 

The  following  species  occur  in  habitats  containing  Cocos 
(Table  2): 

Trees:  Pisonia  grandis,  Morinda  citrifolia,  Pandanus 
tectorius,  Cordia  subcordata,  Cocos  nucifera,  Thespesia 
populnea,  Hibiscus  tiliaceus; 

Shrubs:    Tournefortia  argentea,  Ximenia  americana;  and 
Herbs:     Boerhavia   repens,   Portulaca  lutea,   Laportea 
ruderalis.Achyranthescanescens,  Phymatosorusscolopendria, 
Ipomoea  macrantha,  Lepturus  repens,  Taccaleontopetaloides, 
Psilotum  nudum,  Phyllanthus  amarus,  and  Sida  fallax. 

The  distribution  of  Cocos  (Fig.  14).  in  order  of  decreasing 
abundance  is  as  follows:  South:  Forests  old  and  neglected. 
Healthiest  palms  line  the  lagoon,  currently  shading  out  strip  of 
native  scrub.  Nake:  Southern  forests  (50-80%  Cocos)  healthier, 
younger,  with  more  native  trees  and  Pandanus  than  on  South: 
grove  of  about  50  palms  on  northeast.  Long:  Range  from  <  I '  i 
cover  (Tr.  C)  to  dense  fringe  adjacent  to  lagoon.  Emerald; 
Northeast  and  center-west  patches.  Mannikiba:  Main  grove. 
northeast:  40  palms.  20  m  high,  another  patch  in  south  centei 
Ana- Ana:  House  site,  northeast  point.  Bird.  Blackfin,  Brothers. 
Nautonga.  North  Brothers.  Pig.  Pisonia.  Raurau.  Shark:  lew 
trees  each,  primarily  in  Tournefortia.  Lone  Palm:  One  tree, 
central  forests. 

History:  A  relatively  small  coconut  grove  was  planted  on 
South  Island  prior  to  the  16th  century  by  Tuamotuan  settlers 
(Emory,  1947; Maude,  1968).  In  1 606.  deQuiros  noted -plenty 
of  palms"  and  "many  cocoa-nuts"  (Markham,  1904).  Since 
then,  every  visitor  has  recorded  them  as  they  grew,  and  still 
grow .  adjacent  to  the  boat  "landing."  A  smaller  grove  evidently 
also  existed  in  the  south-southwest  portion  of  South  Island 


32 


(Lucett,  1851).  According  to  Maude  (ca.  1938).  palms  were 
also  periodically  planted — and  destroyed — "by  whalers  and 
other  chance  visitors  to  the  island." 

Until  Arundel's  arrival  in  1885,  Cocos  was  basically 
confined  to  this  single  grove  in  the  northwest  sector  of  South 
Island  (Maude,  ca.  1942a).  In  1885,  land  clearing  began,  and 
from  then  till  1929,  nearly  38,000  palms  were  planted,  29,480 
between  1916  and  1920  and  another  7.000  young  trees  after 
1927  to  replace  thousands  that  had  perished  (Young,  ca.  1922). 
Arundel's  initial  license  gave  him  the  exclusive  rights  to 
occupy  Caroline  and  Flint,  planting  coconuts  and  other  trees 
for  2 1  years,  in  return  for  an  annual  rental  of  50  pounds  ( Maude, 
ca.  1942a).  In  1929.  13,215  trees  remained,  after  which  no  one 
has  counted  them.  Our  field  work  and  scrutiny  of  aerial 
photographs  indicate  that  far  fewer  exist  today. 

Caroline's  plantations  produced  copra  periodically  from 
1 873  to  1934,  but  never  profitably.  They  suffered  greatly  from 
the  atoll's  abandonment  from  1901-1916.  Dying  and  poorly 
planted  palms  presented  continual  setbacks  ( Young,  ca.  1 922), 
and  in  1878  a  hurricane  wrought  great  destruction  (N.I.D., 
1943).  In  addition,  plantation  managers  lamented  their  poor 
productivity  due  to  choking  "by  undergrowth  and  Pohue  Vine 
[said  to  be  Tuumfetta  (-  Triumfetta) procumbens,  most  likely 
a  misidentification  of  lpomoea  mac  rant  ha],  destruction  of 
inflorescences  by  great  numbers  of  seabirds  which  roosted  in 
the  tops  and  broke  off  the  flowers  as  they  appeared,"  disease, 
and  ruination  of  nuts  by  Polynesian  rats  and  coconut  crabs.  As 
a  result  of  this,  the  resident  laborers  slaughtered  many  crabs, 
and  "greatly  reduced  the  numbers  of  sea  birds,  who  migrated  to 
unoccupied  islets."  The  rat  problem  was  never  resolved  and 
appears  to  be  the  major  reason  for  repeated  failure  of  the 
plantations  on  both  Caroline  and  Flint.  Their  enormous  numbers 
and  voracious  eating  habits  greatly  reduced  both  the  crops  of 
potentially  healthy  nuts  as  well  as  the  volume  of  dried  copra.  In 
1920, 4,600  were  trapped  on  South  Island,  and  hundreds  more 
were  killed  by  small  terriers  introduced  specifically  to  control 
them  (Young,  ca.  1922).  Maude  (personal  communication) 
recalls  that  one  terrier  still  survived  in  the  1940's.  Rats  still 
abound,  especially  within  coconut  groves  and  Pisonia  forests. 
Another  serious  problem  was  due  to  coconut  crabs  digging  up 
recently  planted  nuts  and  also  their  habit  of  pinching  off  young 
developing  shoots.  Evidently  after  the  palms  had  attained  one 
year's  growth  this  was  no  longer  a  problem  (Young,  ca.  1922). 

Before  abandonment  (1902  to  1916,  and  after  1934), 
Caroline's  plantations  were  owned  by  several  companies  whose 
average  annual  copra  output  was  approximately  14  tons.  From 
1934  to  the  1970's,  copra  was  harvested  sporadically  by  small 
parties  from  Tahiti  (Garnett.  1983).  but  within  the  last  2 
decades  it  stopped  altogether. 

Despite  the  relatively  fertile  soils  of  South  Island,  the 
problems  in  the  plantations  hampered  the  establishment  of 
permanent  settlements  on  Caroline.  In  the  1930's,  Maude 
estimated  that  the  atoll  could  support  400  Gilbertese.  increasing 
to  over  1 .000  "when  the  island  has  been  fully  planted"  ( Maude, 
ca.  1938).  However,  colonists  were  never  established,  leaving 
Caroline  "one  of  the  least  spoiled  islands  in  the  Pacific" 


(Stoddart,  1976).  As  Young's  (ca.  1922)  unpublished 
"Memoranda"  indicate,  Caroline  is  not  as  pristine  as  it  appears; 
however,  the  rapid  comeback  of  many  of  its  natural  forests  on 
the  windward  side  is  remarkable  (see  discussion  under  Pisonia 
Forests,  this  section). 

Distribution  and  Abundance:  We  recognize  four 
subdivisions  of  the  coconut  woodlands:  Cocos  Plantations, 
Dying  Cocos-lpomoea  Plantation,  Scattered  Groves  on  Small 
Motus,  and  Mixed  Forest  with  Cocos. 

1.  Cocos  Plantations  (34.07  ha) 

Palm  forests  now  dominate  South  Island  and  southwestern 
Nake.  Although  the  planting  of  Cocos  on  South  altered  most 
of  its  original  habitats,  Nake  escaped  with  less  damage:  whereas 
Cocos  covers  77%  of  the  area  on  South,  it  takes  up  only  6%  of 
Nake  (11%  including  mixed  forests).  The  60  to  100-year-old 
trees  form  tall,  closed  canopy  woodlands  (PI.  24)  21-25  m 
high,  the  customary  maximum  height  recorded  for  old 
plantations  (Fosberg,  1953).  Figure  51  shows  the  distribution 
and  abundance  of  plant  species  along  a  transect  running  centrally 
through  the  island,  while  Fig.  36  depicts  a  schematic  profile  of 
the  same  swath. 

Pure  coconut  plantations  (like  all  habitats  on  Caroline) 
harbor  relatively  few  species:  up  to  7  trees,  zero  to  2  shrubs,  and 
5-11  herbs.  The  ground  vegetation  and  shrub  layers  are 
composed  almost  exclusively  of  indigenous  species,  an  unusual 
feature.  However,  skirting  the  edge  of  South  Island's  lagoon, 
tall  palms  overhang  the  water  and  crowd  out  native  plants; 
there  were  considerably  fewer  Suriana  and  Tournefortia  in 
1988  (PI.  29)  than  in  1965  (PL  40). 

2.  Dving  Cocos-lpomoea  Plantation  (53.92  ha) 

Mature  plantations  characteristically  become  overgrown 
with  shrubs  and  vines  (Fosberg,  1953.  1956).  lpomoea 
macrantha.  the  sole  vine  on  Caroline,  forms  tangled, 
impenetrable  thickets.  Indigenous,  nonparasitic,  and  widely 
dispersed  by  ocean  currents,  it  occurs  naturally  in  small  numbers 
in  natural  habitats  on  Caroline,  but  grows  rampantly  in  disturbed 
areas.  These  vine-covered  coconut  woodlands  cover  two- 
thirds  of  South  Island's  interior  (Fig.  50).  The  Dying  Cocos- 
lpomoea  forest  is  moribund.  It  is  bordered  by  a  belt  of  living 
palms,  which  in  turn  are  sheltered  by  a  narrow  rim  of  indigenous 
vegetation  (Figs.  36.51). 

While  surveying  the  South  Island  transects,  the  authors 
stomped  over  intertwining  thickets  up  to  3  m  high  (PI.  7)  and 
crawled  through  tightly-knit  masses  of  vines  descending  from 
the  crowns  of  old  palms,  Pisonia,  and  Morinda  bushes,  until 
this  too,  proved  impenetrable.  In  sunny  clearings  dotted  with 
dead  or  dying  palms,  lpomoea,  Boerhavia,  and  Phymatosorus 
proliferated  luxuriantly,  lpomoea,  one  of  the  prime  reasons  for 
the  double  abandonment  of  copra  production,  will  continue  to 
destroy  the  coconuts,  encouraging  natural  ecological  succession 
to  begin  anew. 

3.  Scattered  Groves  on  Small  Motus  (0.82  ha) 
Drift-derived  palms  were  observed  as  long  ago  as  1834 

(Bennett,  1840).  In  1916,  when  planting  operations  were 
commenced  after  a  break  of  14  years,  about  40  trees  grew 
beyond  the  plantations  (Maude,  ca.   1942a).    Today,  small 


33 


Cocos  groves,  up  to  50  palms,  drift-derived  and  plantation 
remnants,  generally  close  to  the  shoreline  (Pis.  29,  30),  occur 
on  1 1  motus. 
4.      Mixed  Forest  with  Cocos  (6.24  ha) 

This  forest  type  is  a  simplified  version  of  more  complex 
and  varied  mixed  forests  that  occur  on  most  inhabited  atolls. 
Composed  of  both  anthropogenic  and  native  elements,  it 
contains  a  high  proportion  of  Cocos  (50-80%)  mingled  with 
variable  proportions  of  Tournefortia.  Pisonia  and  Pandanus. 
This  forest  type  occurs  primarily  in  southern  Nake  (Fig.  14), 
but  also  on  Emerald,  Shark,  and  southwest  Long,  where  it 
mixes  with  Cordia  and  Tournefortia. 

House  Site:  A  single  clearing  on  Motu  Ana-Ana, 
approximately  40  m  x  70  m,  contains  a  few  Cocos  adjacent  to 
a  vegetable  garden  and  thatched  living  quarters  (PI.  53). 

Associations  with  Seabirds:  Coros-dominated  habitats 
were  the  most  depauperate  on  Caroline:  only  brown  noddies 
and  white  terns  breed  there  (PI.  54).  The  noddies  nest  high 
within  the  frond  and  inflorescence  bases,  whereas  the  white 
terns  preferred  lower  sites.  The  absence  of  other  species 
suggests  that  the  anthropogenic  Cocos  forests  seriously  inhibit 
seabird  use  and  may  continue  to  do  so  for  decades  until  they  are 
replaced  by  native  vegetation. 

Absent  Plant  Communities 

Caroline's  impoverished  flora  and  simple  geology  has 
resulted  in  a  limited  variety  of  ecosystems.  The  atoll  is  thus 
notable  not  only  for  its  grand  Pisonia  forests,  extensive 
monotypic  stands  of  Tournefortia,  and  presence  of  Cordia 
groves,  but  also  for  the  absence  of  several  ecosystems  that  are 
generally  considered  typical  of  Pacific  atolls: 
/.     Sesuvium  flats; 

2.  Pemphis,  Scaevola,  and  Sida  scrub  (two  Scaevola  plants 
are  present,  and  the  only  two  Sida  records  are  from  1884  and 
1990); 

3.  Barringtonia,  Calophyllum,  Guettarda,  Hernandia,  and 
Ochrosia  forests; 

4.  Plant  associations  (except  Cocos)  typical  of  native  cultures 
on  atolls:  breadfruit  groves  (Artocarpus  alt  His),  taro  pits 
( Cyrtosperma  chamissonis,  Colocasia  esculenta,  Xanthosoma 
sagittifolia),  cultivated  ornamentals  (Hibiscus  rosa-sinensis. 
Plumeria  spp.,  et  cetera),  or  weedy  grasslands/wastelands 
(Paspalum,  Sporobolus.  Wedelia,  Vigna,  et  cetera).  Even 
widespread  introduced  strand  species  such  as  Terminalia 
catappa  and  Casuarina  equisetifolia  are  absent. 

In  addition,  there  are  no  mangroves,  peat  bogs,  marshes, 
ponds,  salt  flats,  or  other  habitats  associated  with  fresh  or 
brackish  water.  Poorly  represented  are: 
/.  Lepturus  grassland.  Although  Lepturus  is  present  in 
coastal  herb  mats,  and  occasionally  in  patches  w  ithin  the  forest 
understory,  it  does  not  form  a  separate  plant  community. 
However,  it  may  once  have  covered  the  extensive  clearings  on 
South  Island  (PI.  2). 

2.  Mixed  forest.  Though  6.24  ha  of  mixed  forest  (with 
Cocos)  occurs  (primarily  on  Nake),  it  is  of  such  minor 
importance  to  Caroline's  overall  vegetation  that  it  is  treated  as 
a  subsection  of  coconut  woodlands. 


Description  and  Ecology  of  the  Motus 

These  islet  accounts  synthesize  the  history,  physiography, 
vegetation  patterns,  ecology,  seabird  colonies,  miscellaneous 
biota,  and  the  effects  of  human  activity  (if  any)  on  Caroline's 
39  motus  (Fig.  2).  Mapping  is  based  on  the  coast-to-coast 
transects,  perimeter  surveys,  complete  surveys  (smaller  motus), 
color  transparencies,  and  aerial  photographs. 

All  motus  are  detrital  reef  islets  representing  many 
evolutionary  stages  from  barely  emerged  coral  rubble  to  large 
islets  with  relatively  fertile  "soils"  supporting  lush  vegetation. 
There  is  one  tiny  old  reef  platform  in  its  final  stages  of  erosion. 

We  discuss  and  map  them  in  geographic  order  beginning 
in  the  north  with  Nake  and  progressing  down  the  windward  reef 
through  Long  and  the  13  Windward  Islets  to  South  Island. 
Beginning  anew  in  the  north,  we  move  south  through  7  South 
Nake  Islets,  1 1  Central  Leeward  Islets,  and  finally  the 
5  Southern  Leeward  Islets. 

Because  of  the  variety  of  islet  shapes,  "long"  or  "length" 
refers  to  the  longest  dimension  lying  parallel  to  the  outer  reef 
edge  (normally  north-south)  and  "wide"  or  "width"  to  the 
longest  dimension  perpendicular  to  the  outer  reef  edge  (normally 
east-west).  South  Island,  the  only  exception,  is  considered  to 
lie  adjacent  to  the  southern  reef  edge,  so  its  "length"  is  measured 
east-west.  Seabird  numbers  are  from  Subchapter  1 .2.  Table  1, 
this  volume.  For  convenience  in  locating  particular  islets,  the 
order  is  as  follows: 

/.    Nake  Island  (Fig.  37) 
2.    Long  Island  (Fig.  38) 


indw; 

ird  Islets 

3. 

Bo'sun  Bird  (Fig.  42) 

4. 

Windward  (Fig.  43) 

5. 

Crescent  (Fig.  43) 

6. 

Atibu  (Fig.  43) 

7. 

North  Pig  (Fig.  44) 

8. 

Pig  (Fig.  44) 

9. 

Skull  (Fig.  441 

10. 

North  Brothers  (Fig.  44) 

II. 

Brothers  (Fig.  44) 

12. 

Noddy  Rock  (Fig.  47) 

13. 

North  Arundel  (Fig.  47) 

14. 

Arundel  (Fig.  47) 

15. 

Tridacna  (Fig.  48) 

16. 

South  Island  (Fig.  50) 

South  Nake  Islets 


17. 
18. 
19. 

20. 
21 
22 
23 


Pandanus  (Fig.  52) 
Danger  (Fig.  52) 
Booby  (Fig.  52) 
Coral  (Fig.  52) 
Lone  Palm  (Fig.  52) 
Kota(Fig.  52) 
Mouakena  (Fig.  52) 


34 


Central  Leeward  Islets 

24.  Mannikiba  (Fig.  53) 

25.  Blackfin  (Fig.  54) 

26.  Matawa  (Fig.  54) 

27.  Emerald  (Fig.  54) 

28.  Shark  (Fig.  55) 

29.  Scarlet  Crab  (Fig.  55) 

30.  Nautonga  (Fig.  55) 

31.  Azure  (Fig.  55) 

32.  Reef-flat  (Fig.  55) 

33.  Bird  (Fig.  55) 

34.  Fishball  (Fig.  55) 

Southern  Leeward  Islets 

35.  Raurau(Fig.  57) 

36.  Eitei  (Fig.  57) 

37.  Pisonia(Fig.  57) 

38.  Kimoa(Fig.  57) 

39.  Ana- Ana  (Fig.  57) 

/.     NAKE  ISLAND  (91.72  ha)  (Figs.  30,37;  Pis. 
35-37,43) 


18,23. 


History:  Nake's  large  size  and  underground  water  lens, 
coupled  with  topography  and  soils  more  varied  than  elsewhere 
on  Caroline,  attracted  early  Polynesian  settlers.  Because  early 
European  visitors  stayed  primarily  on  South  Island,  there  is 
only  a  single  reference  to  Cocos  prior  to  the  late  19th  century 
(one  tree  seen  in  1825  by  Paulding  [1831]). 

The  far  northwest  of  Nake  (also  called  North  Island  in 
Young,  ca.  1922)  houses  the  most  important  archaeological 
site  on  Caroline — a  large  marae  (Figs.  3,37;  PI.  36).  Discovered 
during  the  guano  era,  the  site  is  marked  as  "graves"  on  Arundel' s 
map.  Arundel,  who  was  living  on  the  atoll  when  the  marae  was 
discovered,  describes  it  thus:  "On  the  north-west  end  of 
Caroline  are  some  curious  old  native  remains,  whether  places 
of  burial  or  of  sacrifice  I  cannot  determine.  I  opened  one  of 
these,  but  could  find  no  indication  whatever  to  guide  me  in  a 
decision"  (Arundel,  1890).  The  senior  author,  R.  Falconer,  and 
G.  Wragg  located,  measured,  and  photographed  this  marae  in 
1990.  The  entire  courtyard  was  approximately  18  m  long  by 
14  m  wide.  All  10  peripheral  stones  and  the  central  one  were 
easily  identifiable  from  the  1883  plan  (Fig.  3),  although  a  few 
had  fallen  over  or  broken  due  to  encroaching  vegetation.  The 
lower  wall,  partly  destroyed  by  Arundel,  had  not  been 
reconstructed.  It  is  probable  that  this  marae  had  not  been  seen 
since  the  1 880' s;  though  discussed  by  Emory  (1947),  he  never 
visited  Caroline  personally. 

Northwest  Nake  is  particularly  suitable  for  a  place  of 
worship  and  sacrifice:  it  fits  most  of  the  environmental  criteria 
indispensable  to  ancient  Tuamotuan  religious  ritual  (Emory, 
1947).  First,  flat  ground  was  necessary,  preferably  lying  at 
right  angles  to,  or  parallel  to,  the  lagoon.  Second,  it  was 
important  to  have  the  wind  blowing  across  the  marae  to  waft 
away  the  smells  of  sacrificed  animals.  Third,  ceremonial  items 
included  branches  of  the  Pisonia  tree,  leaves  of  Cocos  (for  leaf 


charms/" rosaries"),  and  the  aerial  roots  oiPandanus.  Fourth, 
feathers  from  "black  terns"  (black  noddy),  frigatebirds,  and 
red-tailed  tropicbirds  were  also  necessary  for  rituals.  Rather 
than  a  smooth  substrate,  the  early  Polynesians  would  have  had 
to  be  content  with  leveled  coral  rubble  and  distance  from  the 
lagoon.  The  only  organism  not  living  near  the  marae  today  is 
the  tropicbird;  however,  their  elongated  tail  feathers  could 
have  been  plucked  from  adults  nesting  on  nearby  motus. 

Since  marae  are  sacred  places,  there  is  possibly  a  meaning 
to  the  location  of  the  main  "courtyard"  close  to  the  atoll's 
northern  tip.  Generally  the  northern  extremities  of  islands  were 
auspicious  places  for  Polynesians;  it  is  here,  they  believed,  that 
disembodied  spirits  were  whisked  to  the  netherworld. 

Physiography:  Largest  in  area,  Nake  is  the  northernmost 
motu,  separated  from  Long  by  a  40-m  channel  (PI.  18).  With 
maximum  dimensions  2,000  m  long  and  685  m  wide,  it  is 
basically  rectangular  with  rounded  corners  and  a  peninsula- 
like extension  in  the  southeast. 

Nake  lies  north  of  the  lagoon,  having  a  southern  "bay" 
(which  we  named  Sandy  Inlet),  in  which  silt,  sand,  and  fine 
coral  debris  are  being  actively  deposited  (PL  23).  Sandy  Inlet, 
,  a  hard,  flat  expanse  of  fine  lagoon  mud  and  sand,  is  145  m  wide 
at  its  mouth  and  extends  200  m  north  into  the  main  islet.  Its 
3.50  ha  provide  a  favorite  feeding  location  for  shorebirds, 
especially  bristle-thighed  curlews.  If  Arundel's  chart  (Fig.  4) 
is  correct,  Sandy  Inlet  has  increased  its  land  area  during  the  last 
century. 

On  the  reef  flats  off  the  west  side  are  extensive  remnants 
of  jagged  upraised  reef  (PI.  1 1)  and  occasional  beachrock.  The 
exposed  beaches  and  reef  flats  at  Nake's  north  point  are 
especially  broad,  characteristic  of  reef  flats  at  the  exposed 
corners  of  islands.  Comparisons  of  the  northern  sweep  of 
rubble  on  recent  aerial  photos  with  Arundel' s  map  indicate  that 
much  coral  debris,  in  the  form  of  raised  ridges  (PI.  17),  has  been 
added  since  1883.  In  the  deep,  fine  coral  rubble  mixed  with 
sand  east  of  the  marae,  the  1990  expedition  found  three  old 
turtle  nests.  Overall,  unvegetated  coral  rubble,  mud,  and  sand 
account  for  only  6%  of  the  land  area.  In  addition,  some  sparsely 
vegetated  expanses  of  hardpan  were  noted  in  the  south-central 
sector,  just  inland  of  the  coast  within  a  belt  of  Tournefortia 
forest. 

Nake's  windward  coast,  complete  with  a  peaked  beach 
crest  and  discontinuous  beachrock,  is  30  m  wide  in  the  north, 
narrowing  to  3  m  in  the  south.  Offshore,  submerged  reef  flats 
form  a  sandy  moat  bordered  by  a  barrier  reef  upon  which  waves 
pound  incessantly. 

In  the  distant  past,  what  we  now  call  Nake  consisted  of  two 
separate  motus.  Aerial  photos  (Chapter  Frontispiece)  reveal  an 
oblique,  ancient  channel  about  two-thirds  of  the  way  down  the 
islet.  It  is  now  well  vegetated  in  the  center  but  scrubby  near  the 
coastlines. 

Vegetation:  There  are  16  plant  species  (5  trees,  1  shrub, 
10  herbs),  59%  of  Caroline's  flora.  Nake  is  the  lushest  motu. 
Its  woodlands  (82.39  ha)  are  about  80%  native  and  20%  with 
Cocos  (PI.  37).  Although  in  1916  there  were  about  260  palms, 
and  the  entire  island  was  evidently  planted  with  10,544  palms 
in  1918-1919(Young,ca.  1922,  Table  13),  substantial  tracts  of 
each  major  vegetation  type  occur  today.  Its  interior  is  rich  in 


35 


Pisonia,  with  the  largest  acreage  (20.79  ha)  and  some  of  the 
tallest  trees  (20  m  high)  on  the  atoll  (PI.  43.  Table  1 1 ).  In 
addition,  Cordia  is  well  represented:  two  major  groves  of 
Cordia-Toumefortia  forest  occupy  11.8  ha,  2%  of  Nake"s 
area.  Extensive  pioneer  herb  mats.  Hanked  on  their  inner  sides 
by  Tournefortia  scrub,  occur  in  the  north  and  east.  The 
remaining  Cocos,  essentially  in  the  southern  quarter,  comprise 
Caroline's  second  largest  coconut  grove. 

Birds:  Nake,  with  80%  of  Caroline's  breeding  seabird 
species,  shows  a  direct  correlation  between  islet  size  and  bird 
species  diversity.  Nine  species  of  seabirds  breed,  all  with 
larger  populations  (pairs)  than  previously  reported  (Clapp  & 
Sibley,  1971a):  masked  booby  (105),  brown  booby  ( 1).  red- 
footed  booby  (496),  great  frigatebird  (522),  lesser  frigatebird 
1 56),  brown  noddy  ( 390),  black  noddy  (8 14),  sooty  tern  (nesting 
in  1989;  Anne  Falconer,  personal  communication),  and  white 
tern  (1,094). 

2.  LONG  ISLAND  (75.98  ha)  (Figs.  30,35,38-41; 
Pis.  8,13,18,20,28,33,47,58) 

Third  largest  in  area,  this  longest  of  motus  covers  nearly 
one-third  of  the  atoll's  windward  side.  In  the  north  it  is 
separated  from  Nake  by  a  narrow  channel;  from  its  southern  tip 
a  chain  of  smaller  motus  extends  south  along  the  windward 
reef. 

Physiography  and  History:  Long — 4.226  m  long  and 
330  m  wide — is  somewhat  snake-shaped,  with  an  enlarged 
northern  "head"  and  attenuated  "tail."  From  a  distance  its 
vegetation  appears  as  a  series  of  humps.  Long  has  experienced 
a  fairly  complex  geological  history,  noted  by  the  Solar  Eclipse 
Party:  "On  some  of  the  islands  there  are  spaces  void  of 
\  egetation,  extending  from  lagoon  to  beach,  which  indicate  the 
existence  at  a  former  time  of  a  water  separation"  (Holden  & 
Qualtrough.  1884). 

At  present.  Long  is  composed  of  five  distinct  former  islets 
separated  by  sparsely  vegetated  channels  of  coarse  sand  and 
coral  gravel.  Aerial  photographs  also  reveal  further,  older 
subdivisions  (discussed  below).  Coalescence  and  fracturing  of 
the  original  motus  have  probably  occurred  repeatedly.  Since 
erosion  proceeds  faster  on  an  atoll's  windward  reefs,  providing 
coral  fragments,  coralline  algae,  and  pulverized  mollusks,  il  is 
no  surprise  that  the  first  series  of  Caroline's  motus  to  fuse  were 
those  facing  this  rich  source  of  parent  material. 

Long's  coarse  rubble  beaches  (Pis.  13.20)  are  a  mirror 
image  of  those  on  Nake:  southward,  the)  widen  progressively. 
The  swath  of  unvegetated  rubble  above  high  tide  line  in  the 
upper  two-thirds  of  Long  averages  S  m  wide,  while  in  the  lower 
third  il  is  40  m  wide.  Unvegetated  coral  debris  accounts  for 
10%  of  the  island's  area  (Fig.  30).  Beachrock,  Hanking  the 
windward  shoreline  for  most  of  its  length,  is  more  abundant 
than  elsewhere  on  the  atoll  (PI.  58). 

I  ong's  lagoon  Hank  is  edged  w  ith  submerged  sand  and  silt 
and  is  line  of  the  most  sheltered  parts  of  Caroline.  Sand  and 
rubble  deposition  off  the  south  point  has  formed  an  islet  in  the 
lagoon  ( Bo'sun  Bird  |,  w  Inch  could,  in  the  future,  coalesce  with 
Long's  south  point  to  form  a  hook. 


An  uncommon  substrate  on  Caroline,  upraised  reef 
( makatea  >  forms  a  low  rampart  ( generally  <  1  m  high )  paralleling 
the  ridge  crest  inside  the  vegetation  for  much  of  the  lower 
quarter  of  Long. 

In  1 990  Graham  Wragg  found  some  scattered  large  stones, 
similar  to  those  of  the  marae  on  Nake.  located  centrally  100  m 
north  of  the  southern  tip  of  Long,  confirming  the  report  of  the 
remains  of  a  smaller  marae  on  Long  Island  (Holden  & 
Qualtrough,  1884).  Wragg  noted  that  the  marae  was  indeed 
smaller  than  that  on  Nake.  w  ith  dimensions  approximately  3  m 
wide  by  8- 1 0  m  long.  Its  orientation  appeared  to  be  northeast- 
southwest.  The  wall  on  one  end  was  evidently  smashed  by 
storm  waves.  Only  two  of  the  peripheral  upright  stones  were 
still  standing;  they  were  of  similar  size  to  those  on  Nake.  The 
platform  was  in  reasonable  condition,  with  a  huge  Pisonia  tree 
growing  through  it.  Some  rock  slabs  were  large  (2  x  2  m).  The 
entire  marae  was  situated  within  a  Pisonia  grove,  with  some 
Cocos  but  no  Pandanus  nearby.  We  do  not  know  if  the  nearby 
coconut  grove  ( 1 .6  ha)  was  present  before  1 .343  palms  ( 20%  of 
the  islet's  area)  were  planted  in  1918-19  (Young,  ca.  1922). 
The  sheltered  location  and  a  Pisonia— Cocos  forest,  which 
suggests  an  old  clearing,  further  indicate  prior  occupation. 

In  1990.  G.  Wragg  also  uncovered  an  RNZAF  survey 
marker  just  inland  of  Long's  southernmost  tip. 

Vegetation:  There  are  15  plant  species  (4  trees.  2  shrubs. 
9  herbs)  on  Long.  56%  of  the  total  flora.  Long's  variety  of 
habitats,  vegetation  heights,  substrata,  and  birds  make  it  the 
most  diverse  islet  on  Caroline.  Only  3%  of  its  area  remains  in 
Cocos.  All  the  atoll's  seabirds  have  bred  here.  Its  ecology  is 
best  understood  with  reference  to  Figs.  35  and  39—1 1 . 

Within  the  basic  pattern  of  five  coalesced  motus.  it  may  be 
seen  that: 

/.  From  north  to  south  (measured  from  the  midpoint  of 
each  former  channel)  the  motus,  of  divergent  size  and  shape, 
are  approximately  320.  620.  700.  1.840.  and  100  m  long. 

2.  Each  former  islet,  crowned  by  a  Pisonia  forest,  contains 
concentric  rings  of  decreasing  fertility  around  its  core  and  is 
morphologically  similar  to  islets  surrounded  by  water,  except 
that  the  coarse  coral  gravel  along  the  former  perimeter  is  less 
marked.  More  specifically,  beach  sands  and  gravel  extend  for 
200-300  m  north  and  south  o(  the  old  channels,  after  which 
they  increasingly  accumulate  coral  rubble,  humus,  and  guano. 

3.  The  dominant  vegetation  is  Tournefortia,  interspersed 
with  4  patches  of  taller  Pisonia  forest  and  scattered  clumps  of 
Cocos  md  Cordia.  Interrupted  herb  mats  parallel  the  windward 
coasl  and  often  extend  across  the  island  along  former  channels 
(PI.  33).  Vegetation  height  varies  from  2  cm  to  15  m. 

4.  Plant  species  diversity  is  highest  in  Tournefortia- 
Pisonia  and  lowest  in  Pisonia  forests. 

5.  Long's  tallest,  most  mature  Pisonia  groves  (up  to  L009S 
Pisonia)  occur  on  the  largest  of  the  former  islets.  The  Pisonia 
forest  near  the  south  end  (Tr.  10).  although  healthy,  is  only 
12  m  tall.  This  may  be  due  to  its  impoverished  makatea 
substrate  of  pitted  reef  rock  barely  covered  with  "soil."  Since 
it  lies  adjacent  to  Long's  most  luxuriant  Cocos  grove,  its  land 
could  well  have  been  cleared  in  1918-19.  with  the  Pisonia 
forest  taking  longer  than  elsewhere  to  recuperate.  Because  tern 


36 


guano  increases  soil  fertility  and  is  important  for  Pisonia 
growth  (Fosberg.  1953).  it  is  of  interest  that  neither  black  nor 
brown  noddies  nested  here. 

ft.  Deep  dips  in  Fig.  39  (lower  graph)  correspond  to  east- 
west  corridors  formed  from  old  channels.  Vegetation  in  these 
relatively  infertile,  sandy  flats  is  low.  similar  to  that  on  small 
developing  motus  (i.e..  native  herbs  with  scattered  Tournefortia 
<2  in  high).  One  sandy  channel  (Tr.  C;  PI.  33)  supported  a 
sparse  population  of  Suriana.  During  the  February  1990 
cyclone,  all  vegetation  was  either  uprooted,  washed  away,  or 
smothered  with  fresh  sand  and  coral  gravel  along  Trs.  A  and  C 
(personal  observation,  March  1990).  Storm  erosion  was 
particularly  marked  within  the  channel  that  almost  bisects  the 
island  (Tr.  A). 

7.  Secondary  dips  mark  even  older  interislet  channels 
("ancient  channels"),  visible  on  aerial  photographs  (Chapter 
Frontispiece)  but  barely  recognizable  in  the  field.  They  are 
overgrown  with  Tournefortia  and/or  Pisonia. 

8.  Sharp  dips  within  established  forests  or  herb  mats 
denote  relatively  recent  channels  gouged  out  by  storms  ("recent 
storm  cuts").  These  were  also  altered  during  the  winter  1990 
storm. 

Figures  40  and  41  illustrate  some  differences  between  the 
windward  and  leeward  coasts.  Transect  C  (Fig.  40)  crosses  the 
north  end  of  Long  through  an  old  interislet  channel  now  filled 
with  sand  and  rubble.  Its  low  profile  reflects  the  simple  habitat 
harboring  halophytic  herbs  and  Tournefortia  shrubs  less  than 
2  m  high.  Although  the  shrubs  are  scattered,  the  lagoon  half  of 
the  transect  passes  through  slightly  higher  ground,  which 
encourages  denser  Tournefortia.  This  transverse  section  is 
similar  to  that  of  a  formative  motu  such  as  Fishball  (Fig.  56). 
This  exposed,  scrubby  swath,  300  m  wide,  harbors  red-footed 
boobies,  great  frigatebirds,  and  a  discrete  population  of  masked 
boobies.  Approximately  127,000  pairs  of  sooty  terns  nested  in 
a  similar  sandy  channel  740  m  to  the  south  (Tr.  A,  PI.  59)  in 
1988. 

Transect  8  (Fig.  4 1 )  crossed  the  islet  nearer  the  southern  tip 
(Fig.  8).  This  profile  departs  significantly  from  the  usual 
parabolic  cross-section  seen  on  most  of  the  small  motus  and 
which  exists  further  north  on  Long  Island.  From  east  ( windward ) 
to  west,  there  is  first  a  wide  expanse  of  coarse,  unvegetated 
rubble,  followed  by  rubble  dotted  with  herbs,  then  Tournefortia 
scrub  increasing  to  9  m  high.  Further  inland,  a  forest  of 
10-m-high  Tournefortia.  Pisonia.  and  Cordia  continues 
westward  to  the  lagoon.  This  leeward  margin  of  Long,  extending 
southward  nearly  to  its  tip,  is  the  only  location  on  Caroline 
where  tall,  indigenous  vegetation  overhangs  and  shelters  the 
lagoon.  No  herb  mat  is  present. 

In  summary.  Long  contains  examples  of  all  major  plant 
communities,  as  well  as  two  minor  ecosystems,  Pisonia- 
Cordia  (3.2  ha)  and  Cocos-Cordia  (0.82  ha).  Its  woodlands 
total  49.60  ha.  Coconut  crabs  inhabit  all  areas  containing 
Cocos  and  Pisonia;  our  rough  estimate  of  their  population  is 
200  crabs. 

Birds:  In  1988,  Long  supported  9  ( 10  in  1965)  species  of 
breeding  seabirds.  as  follows  (pairs):  red-tailed  tropicbird  (5). 
masked  booby  (69),  brown  booby  (12),  red-footed  booby 
(659),  great  frigatebird  (808),  sooty  tern  (179,800).  brown 


noddy  (207),  black  noddy  (986),  and  white  tern  (751 ).  From 
1988  through  1990,  sooty  terns  occupied  19  large  colony  sites 
(Fig.  11,  Subchapter  1.2). 

Comments:  Polynesian  rats  were  abundant,  especially  in 
Cocos  and  Pisonia  habitats.  It  was  often  possible  to  see  3  or  4 
simultaneously  while  conducting  daily  surveys  and  20  or  more 
around  camp.  At  night,  their  numbers  increased  substantially. 
Azure-tailed  skinks  (Emoia  cyanura)  were  noted. 

Windward  Islets 

This  chain  of  13  islets  occupies  the  southern  half  of 
Caroline's  east  coast.  All  rest  on  the  same  reef  flat,  separated 
by  surge  channels  varying  in  width  and  depth.  They  can  be 
waded  with  care  at  low  tides,  but  most  harbor  black-tipped  reef 
sharks:  up  to  four  were  visible  in  the  shallows  within  50  m  of 
an  observer. 

The  motus  range  in  size  from  Noddy  Rock  (0.02  ha)  to 
Windward  (1 1.42  ha).  They  support  every  major  vegetation 
type,  from  simple  herb  mats  to  magnificent  Pisonia  forests, 
21  m  tall.  Because  of  their  constant  exposure  to  trade  winds, 
the  seaward  vegetation  is  wind-  and  salt-shorn.  Though 
appearing  completely  natural,  all  of  the  Windward  Islets  were 
intensively  planted  with  Cocos  (Table  13)  from  1916-1920 
(Young,  ca.  1922).  However,  these  incipient  plantations 
experienced  difficulty  and  appear  to  have  been  abandoned 
within  a  few  years  (see  Plant  Communities  section). 

Flanking  the  lagoon  of  the  southern  motus  (Brothers 
through  Tridacna)  and  extending  westward  are  coral  reefs 
densely  studded  with  giant  clams,  whose  iridescent, 
multicolored  mantles  add  to  Caroline's  outstanding  natural 
assets  (PI.  26;  Subchapter  1.2,  Conservation  section). 

3.     BO'SUN  BIRD  ISLET  (0.86  ha)  (Figs.  29,42;  PI.  9) 

We  named  this  motu  for  its  red-tailed  tropicbirds, 
commonly  called  bo' sun  birds.  The  sizeable  population  is  the 
largest  on  Caroline.  In  addition,  our  1988  records  constituted 
the  first  known  breeding  of  this  species  on  the  atoll. 

Physiography:  Bo'sun  Bird  Islet,  165  m  west  of  Long's 
southern  tip.  is  the  only  motu  lying  "within"  Caroline' s  lagoon. 
It  shares  the  same  reef  as  Long,  however,  and  is  not  a  true 
"lagoon  motu." 

Amoeboid  in  shape,  Bo'sun  Bird  is  greatly  affected  by  the 
tidal  waters  that  spread  across  the  shallow  reef  flats  and  gush 
through  the  surge  channels  that  separate  Long  and  Windward. 
Because  it  sits  near  the  inner  edge  of  a  wide  windward  reef  flat, 
the  layering  of  sediments  around  it  is  complex  and  transitory; 
our  observations  indicate  that  more  rubble  was  deposited  on 
the  islet's  western  edge  since  the  aerial  photos  were  taken  in 
1985.  Its  western  shoreline  rises  gradually  to  a  high  water 
mark,  and  slight  changes  in  water  level  greatly  change  its 
overall  size  and  shape.  At  high  tide  its  perimeter  resembles  the 
shape  of  Pinocchio'  s  head — ovoid  with  a  long,  expanded  nose. 
The  "head"  is  approximately  70  m  wide  and  115  m  long,  while 
the  "nose"  is  45  m  long  and  15  m  wide. 

Vegetation  and  Birds:  Bo'sun  Bird  Islet,  composed  of 
coral  rubble  and  sand,  supports  only  natural  herb  mats 
(Heliotr opium,  Portulaca.  Lepturus)  and  Tournefortia  scrub 


37 


(to  4  m  tall).  These  two  simple  plant  communities  cover  35% 
and  55%  of  the  land  area,  respectively.  For  its  size,  the  motu 
is  sparsely  vegetated,  with  only  four  plant  species  (one  shrub, 
three  herbs),  15%  of  Caroline's  total  flora.  There  are  no 
introductions. 

Bo'sun  Bird's  most  notable  attributes  are  its  4  species  of 
breeding  seabirds:  red-tailed  tropicbird  (47  pairs  in  1988,  but 
130  pairs  seen  in  1990),  sooty  tern  (8,400  pairs),  brown  noddy 
( 10  pairs),  and  white  tern  (6  pairs). 

4.  WINDWARD  ISLET  ( 1 1.42  ha)  (Figs.  29,43) 

We  named  this  "Windward"  because  it  is  the  first  major, 
and  largest.  Windward  Islet. 

Physiography:  Windward  is  broadly  crescentic  in  shape. 
508  m  long  by  287  m  wide.  It  parallels  the  reef's  longitudinal 
axis  and  is  set  close  to  the  lagoon.  Its  seaward  beach  is  quite 
narrow  (3  m  wide);  there  is  no  lagoon  beach. 

Vegetation:  Windward  has  1 1  species  of  plants  (3  trees, 
1  shrub,  7  herbs),  41%  of  the  total  flora.  A  windward  crescent 
of  halophytic  herbs  borders  a  zone  of  Tournefortia  scrub, 
which  mixes  quite  densely  with  Pisonia  and  Cordia  over  most 
of  the  interior  in  a  bilobed  pattern.  These  latter  forests, 
reaching  14  m  high  in  the  south  and  9  m  in  the  north,  total 
8.67  ha.  This  unusual  distribution  of  central  forests  undoubtedly 
reflects  Pisonia' s  recovery  from  1 00%  land  clearing  for  Cocos — 
1,299  palms— in  1920  (Young,  ca.  1922,  Table  13).  It  is 
remarkable  that  not  one  Cocos  remains  as  a  legacy  of  this 
disturbance. 

The  east-west  profile  of  Windward,  similar  to  that  of 
Tr.  8,  Long  Island  (Fig.  41 ),  is  typical  of  most  motus,  except 
that  lagoon-facing  herb  flats  are  almost  nonexistent.  Scaevola 
sericea  sericea,  a  new  plant  record  for  the  atoll,  is  unique  to  this 
motu,  although  S.  s.  tuamotensis  was  found  on  South  Island  in 
1990. 

Birds:  Five  species  of  breeding  birds  were  present,  all  in 
appreciable  numbers  (pairs):  red-footed  booby  (163),  great 
frigatebird  (207).  brown  noddy  (20),  black  noddy  (28),  and 
white  tern  (134). 

Comments:  In  May  1990,  AKK  noted  a  possible  motu 
midway  between  Windward  and  Crescent  Islets  during  midtide. 
It  appeared  to  be  upraised  reef  like  Noddy  Rock,  but  because 
of  extensive  shallow  reefs  in  this  area,  it  has  not  yet  been 
confirmed. 

5.  CRESCENT  ISLET  (3.10  ha)  (Figs.  29.43) 

We  named  this  islet  for  its  cupped  shape. 

Physiography:  Crescent  Islet  is  1 90  m  long  by  225  m  wide. 
It  is  almost  entirely  composed  of  coral  rubble,  with  a  little 
humus  in  the  interior.  The  seaward  beach  is  variable  (up  to 
50  m  wide),  the  lagoon  beach,  insignificant. 

Vegetation:  There  are  10  species  (3  trees.  1  shrub. 
6  herbs),  37%  of  Caroline's  flora.  No  introduced  plants  occur. 
Plant  diversity  is  poorer  than  on  Windward,  a  reflection  of 
small  size,  poor  soils,  and  scant  herb  mats.  However,  woodlands 
cover  two-thirds  of  its  area,  and  the  centra]  stand  of  Pisonia  and 


Cordia  is  87  m  wide  and  up  to  1 3  m  high.  Crescent  was  heavily 
planted  (80%  of  total  area,  228  palms)  in  Cocos  in  1920.  but 
today  none  remain. 

Birds:  Crescent  Islet  was  used  by  the  following  numbers 
of  breeding  pairs:  red-footed  booby  (28),  great  frigatebird  (5). 
brown  noddy  (36),  black  noddy  (60),  and  white  tern  (8). 

6.  MOTU  ATIBU  "Coral  Rubble  Islet"  (0.02  ha) 
(Figs.  27,43) 

Motu  Atibu  was  Caroline's  smallest  and  least  vegetated 
islet.  Third  in  the  windward  chain,  it  measured  13  m  x  18  m. 
We  named  it  for  its  basic  rubble  character.  Vegetation  covered 
only  2%  of  the  land  surface  and  consisted  of  a  few  Tournefortia 
shrubs  (<1  m  high)  encircled  by  narrow  swaths  of  low  herbs 
and  rubble.  Its  three  plant  species  (one  shrub,  two  herbs) — 
1 1%  of  Caroline's  flora — were  among  the  most  meager  on  the 
atoll.  Atibu' s  profile  was  similar  to  that  of  Fishball  (Fig.  56). 
There  were  no  breeding  birds. 

Comments:  Since  a  February  1990  storm.  Atibu  has 
apparently  disappeared,  having  been  reduced  to  a  thin  strip  of 
coral  gravel  below  high  tide  level. 

7.  NORTH  PIG  ISLET  (5.44  ha)  (Figs.  29,44;  Pis.  60.61 ) 

We  named  the  fourth  windward  islet  "North  Pig"  for  its 
location  immediately  north  of  Pig  Islet. 

Physiography:  Classically  crescentic.  North  Pig  is  350  m 
long  and  230  m  wide.  Though  approximately  half  Pig's  area 
and  less  wooded  overall.  North  Pig  has  a  similar  distribution  of 
substrates  (including  sand  on  the  lee  side),  vegetation,  and 
breeding  birds.  Profiles  of  the  two  motus  are  nearly  identical 
(Fig.  45). 

Vegetation:  There  are  1 1  plant  species  (3  trees,  1  shrub. 
7  herbs),  41%  of  Caroline's  flora.  No  introduced  plants  are 
present.  Proceeding  south  along  the  windward  islets,  lagoon- 
side  herb  mats  develop  and  islet  cross-sections  assume  a  more 
perfect  symmetry — low  at  the  edges  and  forming  a  hump  in  the 
middle. 

North  Pig's  three  vegetation  zones  are  predictably 
symmetrical:  a  peripheral  band  of  herbs  (more  extensive  on  the 
"horns"),  curved  belts  of  Tournefortia,  and  a  spacious  central 
forest  of  mixed  Pisonia,  Cordia,  and  Tournefortia.  The  latter 
(to  20  m  tall)  covers  more  than  one-half  the  islet's  width  and 
one-third  its  area  and  includes  fine  Cordia  groves  (Fig.  44). 
This  excellent  forest  is  surprising  because  402  Cocos  palms 
were  planted  on  93%  of  North  Pig's  usable  land  in  1420 
(Young,  ca.  1922,  Table  13).  Measurements  from  25  Pisonia 
trees  (main  trunks)  averaged  19  m  in  height,  221  cm  in 
circumference  (at  1.5  m),  and  261  cm  in  base  circumference 
(Table  12). 

Birds:  Five  species  of  seabirds  bred:  red-footed  booby 
( 3 1  pairs),  great  frigatebird  ( 1 7  pairs),  brown  noddy  (76  pairs). 
black  noddy  (3,199  pairs),  and  white  tern  (1 10  pairs).  The 
largest  colony  of  black  noddies  on  Caroline  nested  in  the  tall 
Pisonias. 

Comments:  Rats  and  coconut  crabs  were  common. 


38 


8.  PIG  ISLET  (7.21  ha)  (Figs.  29,44;  Pis.  27,41,52,60,61) 

Number  5  down  the  chain.  Pig  was  named  prior  to  1883. 
Domestic  pigs  were  introduced  to  Caroline  in  1 828  by  Captain 
Stavers  but  evidently  died  out  before  1834.  Reintroduced  in 
1848  with  the  first  recorded  settlers,  it  is  not  known  how  long 
they  lasted.  One  would  expect  that  they  were  only  on  South 
Island,  but  the  statement  that  "about  one-third  the  distance  up 
the  lagoon  a  canvas  hut  exists  on  one  of  the  smaller  islets  on  the 
eastern  side  of  the  lagoon"  (Holden  &  Qualtrough,  1884) 
suggests  that  perhaps  domestic  animals  also  inhabited  Pig. 
Though  this  is  weak  evidence,  there  must  have  been  some 
reason  for  this  curious  name.  Today,  fortunately,  no  pig 
devastation  is  evident  here  or  elsewhere  on  the  atoll. 

Physiography:  Pig,  shaped  like  a  fat  kidney  bean,  is 
330  m  long  and  255  m  across.  It  is  separated  from  North  Pig 
by  a  channel  60  m  wide. 

Vegetation:  The  islet  has  1 1  plant  species  (4  trees,  1  shrub, 
6  herbs),  4 1  %  of  Caroline' s  flora.  Cocos,  the  only  introduction, 
is  rare  (0.03  ha).  In  1920,  538  palms  were  planted  (Young, 
ca.  1922),  which  covered  approximately  79%  of  Pig's  usable 
area  (Table  13). 

Pig's  vegetation  profile  (Fig.  45)  is  classic:  a  wide, 
windward  herb  mat,  bordered  by  Tournefortia  and  Cordia, 
which,  in  turn,  grades  rapidly  into  an  outstanding  Pisonia 
forest  (to  21  m  tall,  3.36  ha),  one  of  Caroline's  best  groves. 
Measurements  from  five  trees,  mostly  multiple-trunked, 
averaged  16  m  in  height,  338  cm  in  circumference  (at  1.5  m), 
and  282  cm  in  base  circumference  (Table  12).  This  Pisonia 
also  occupies  the  largest  proportion  (46%)  of  any  islet  area.  It 
is  striking  that  such  quality  forests  could  regenerate  in  about 
65  years  (see  section  on  Plant  Communities,  Pisonia  Forests). 
In  the  Cordia  forest  (PI.  27),  also  the  finest  on  Caroline,  six 
trees  averaged  12.6  m  in  height,  1 16  cm  in  circumference  (at 
1.5  m),  and  99.8  cm  around  their  bases.  On  the  lee  side  of  Pig, 
Tournefortia  extends  directly  to  the  lagoon  shore. 

Birds:  Five  species  of  seabirds  bred:  red-footed  booby 
(14  pairs),  great  frigatebird  (118  pairs),  brown  noddy 
(82  pairs),  black  noddy  (1,928  pairs),  and  white  tern  (164 
pairs). 

Comments:  Rats  and  coconut  crabs  were  common.  In 
1 990  agrayish  gecko  (possibly  mourning  gecko,  Lepidodactylus 
lugubris)  was  seen  by  A.  Garnett. 

9.  SKULL  ISLET  (0.02  ha)  (Figs.  27,44;  Pis.  46,49) 

Sixth  in  the  windward  chain,  we  named  Skull  Islet  after 
finding  the  skull,  tail  feather,  and  eggshell  of  a  red-tailed 
tropicbird,  the  first  evidence  that  this  species  bred  on  the  atoll. 
A  low  shelf  of  coral  rubble  and  sand,  barely  above  high  tide 
mark,  this  motu  is  barren  except  for  a  small  herb  mat  under  five 
Tournefortia  bushes  ( 1  m  high)  on  the  lagoon  side.  Only  2% 
of  the  surface  area  is  vegetated.  There  are  three  plant  species 
(one  shrub,  two  herbs),  1 1%  of  the  atoll's  flora.  Although 
appearing  young,  the  islet  must  be  more  than  100  years  old,  as 
it  is  marked  on  Arundel' s  chart  (Fig.  4).  After  February  1990, 
several  large  reef  fragments  had  washed  into  the  channel  close 
to  Skull  Islet. 


In  1988  there  were  no  birds.  However,  in  March  1990,  a 
colony  of  150  brown  noddies  was  in  a  prelaying  phase, 
accompanied  by  6  sooty  terns,  a  brown  booby  and  a  wandering 
tattler. 

70.  NORTH  BROTHERS  ISLET  (1.71  ha)  (Figs.  29.44:  PI.  60) 

The  seventh  windward  motu,  we  named  this  islet  North 
Brothers  because  of  its  location  directly  north  of  the  named 
motu,  Brothers. 

Physiography:  North  Brothers  is  shaped  like  an  oval  that 
curves  lagoonward  toward  Brothers,  40  m  away.  The  concave 
shorelines  and  lack  of  herb  mats  on  the  opposite  shorelines  of 
these  2  islets  suggest  that  they  might  have  been 
formerly  connected.  Composed  primarily  of  rubbly  substrates, 
with  slightly  better  soils  centrally,  it  is  95  m  long  and  250  m 
wide. 

Vegetation:  Plant  species  number  10  (3  trees,  1  shrub, 
6  herbs),  37%  of  Caroline's  flora.  A  few  Cocos  trees  are 
present,  remains  of  the  180  planted  in  1920  (Young,  ca.  1922), 
which  covered  100%  of  all  available  land  on  the  islet 
(Table  13).  Plant  communities  on  North  Brothers  are  simple: 
Tournefortia  (more  open  in  the  west)  rises  to  an  excellent 
Pisonia  forest,  80  m  wide  and  18  m  tall,  on  the  east  end. 
Average  measurements  from  three  Pisonia  trees  were  height 
18  m,  base  circumference  314  cm,  and  number  of  trunks,  2.3 
(Table  12). 

Birds:  Five  species  of  seabirds  bred  on  the  islet  in  1988 
(pairs):  red-footed  booby  (25),  great  frigatebird  (9),  brown 
noddy  (23),  black  noddy  (40,  plus  hundreds  of  old  nests),  and 
white  tern  (69).  In  September  1989,  sooty  terns  nested  on  the 
windward  beach  (Anne  Falconer,  personal  communication), 
and  in  May  1990,  a  prebreeding  swirl  of  thousands  of  sooty 
terns  swarmed  above  Brothers  and  North  Brothers. 

Comments:  Gecko  eggs  were  seen  on  Pisonia  trunks  in 
1990. 

77.   BROTHERS  ISLET  (4.31  ha)  (Figs.  29.44.46:  Pis.  30.60) 

The  eighth  windward  motu.  Brothers  Islet  was  named  last 
century  after  Captain  Brothers,  who  managed  a  stock-raising 
venture  on  Caroline.  In  1 873,  his  rights  to  the  atoll  passed  into 
the  hands  of  John  Arundel. 

Physiography:  Shaped  like  a  molar  tooth,  with  roots 
extending  toward  the  lagoon,  Brothers  Islet  lies  about  two- 
thirds  of  the  way  down  Caroline's  windward  reef.  It  is  198  m 
long  x  178  m  wide  through  the  center.  A  Tridacna  reef  extends 
westward  from  it  almost  completely  across  the  lagoon. 

An  interesting  aspect  of  Brothers'  structure  is  that  Arundel's 
chart  (Fig.  4)  indicates  a  tiny,  separate  motu  off  the  southwest 
point.  Our  survey  and  the  1985  aerial  photos  show  that  this 
motu  is  now  joined  to  Brothers  Islet.  Its  former  identity  is 
marked  by  a  small  patch  of  Tournefortia,  around  which  the 
recently  deposited  sand  and  rubble  is  sparsely  dotted  with 
native  herbs. 

Vegetation:  There  are  1 1  plant  species  (4  trees,  2  shrubs, 
5  herbs),  41%  of  Caroline's  flora.  Cocos,  along  the  leeward 
shore,  is  the  only  introduced  plant.     Three  distinct  plant 


39 


communities  are  present:  peripheral  herb  mats  (including 
leeward  Portulaca  with  Suriana),  Toumefortia  scrub  and 
forest  ( to  6  m  high )  bordered  with  Cordia,  and  a  central  Pisonia 
forest.  Larger  trees  had  up  to  15  trunks  and  multiple  root 
suckers.  Measurements  of  10  trees  (main  trunks)  averaged 
15  m  in  height,  140  cm  in  circumference  (at  1 .5  m),  and  243  cm 
base  circumference.  Distances  to  nearest  neighbor  for  10  trees 
averaged  4.2  meters.  As  on  its  neighbor  islets,  the  Pisonia 
forest  on  Brothers  is  striking,  especially  since  it  has  matured  to 
a  closed-canopy  monotypic  stand  devoid  of  any  subcanopy 
species  (Fig.  40),  evidently  in  about  65  years.  In  1920,  Brothers 
Islet  was  planted  with  315  Cocos  palms,  which  covered 
approximately  97%  of  the  usable  land  area  (Table  13). 

Birds:  Four  species  of  seabirds  bred:  red-footed  booby 
(25  pairs),  brown  noddy  (8  pairs),  black  noddy  (15  pairs),  and 
white  tern  (50  pairs).  In  May  1990,  large  numbers  of  sooty 
terns  swirled  over  Brothers  and  North  Brothers  Islets. 

Comments:  Many  of  the  mature  Pisonia  trees  contained 
capacious  cavities  in  their  boles  that  housed  large  coconut 
crabs.  In  March  1990,  several  of  these  holes  had  feathered 
skeleta  of  sooty  terns  (and  possibly  also  brown  noddies) 
outside  their  entrances,  along  with  freshly-snipped  Pisonia 
branches  (see  Subchapter  1.2,  Coconut  Crabs  section). 

12.  NODDY  ROCK  (0.02  ha)  (Figs.  27.47;  PI.  19) 

We  named  this  ninth  motu  in  the  Windward  Islets  for  its 
only  known  breeding  seabird,  the  brown  noddy.  In  September 
1988.  at  least  80  pairs  were  incubating  their  eggs  on  the 
Portulaca  mat  that  covers  its  central  lee  section. 

Noddy  Rock,  an  eroded  limestone  plateau  (feo),  is  26  in 
wide  by  9  m  long.  It  is  windswept  and  salty,  with  waves 
splashing  over  its  eastern  edge  on  most  days  (it  rises  only 
0.5  m  above  high  water).  During  storms  it  is  completely  awash 
( Anne  Falconer,  personal  communication ).  Only  three  species 
of  plants  (11%  of  Caroline"s  flora)  grow  here,  thinly  covering 
the  western  (leeward)  third  of  the  island  in  the  following 
proportion:  75%  Portulaca,  20%  Lepturus,  and  5% 
Toumefortia). 

13.  NORTH  ARUNDEL  (0.91  ha)  discussed  below 
(Figs.  29,34.47;  Pis.  14.62) 

14.  ARUNDEL  (7.34  ha) 

Arundel  Islet  was  named  last  century  in  honor  of  John  T. 
Arundel.  A  British  trader  and  guano  digger.  Arundel  was  one 
of  the  leading  figures  in  the  Pacific  phosphate  industry .  directing 
guano  and  coconut  planting  operations  on  Caroline  and  other 
islands  from  1873  to  1897.  His  most  valuable  contributions, 
however,  were  his  excellent  surveys  and  maps  of  several 
central  Pacific  islands,  including  Caroline  (Fig.  4).  The  islet 
immediately  to  its  north.  Arundel's  "cap."  we  named  North 
Arundel. 

Physiography:  Arundel's  shape  is  a  I  at  crescent,  with 
wedge-shaped  North  Arundel  lying  across  a  short  channel 
immediately  to  Us  north.  North  Arundel  is  80  m  long  x  1 30  m 


wide,  while  Arundel  is  375  m  long  x  210  m  wide.  They  are 
composed  almost  exclusively  of  coral  rubble  and  Hanked  on 
their  inneredges  by Acropora  reefs  heavily  laden  with  Tridacna 
clams.  Arundel's  inner  "horns"  have  evidently  added  more 
sand  and  rubble  since  1883  (Fig.  4). 

Vegetation:  There  are  1 1  plant  species  (3  trees.  1  shrub. 
7  herbs)  on  Arundel,  41%  of  Caroline's  total.  There  are  no 
introductions.  North  Arundel  has  1 1  (4  trees,  1  shrub.  6  herbs), 
41%  of  Caroline's  flora,  including  one  introduction,  Cocos. 

The  vegetation  on  this  pair  of  motus,  along  with  Tridacna 
to  the  south,  consists  of  extensive  herb  mats,  low  scrub  and 
small  interior  forests  (Fig.  34),  slightly  less  lush  than  the  more 
northerly  windward  motus.  Their  woodlands  are  primarily 
Toumefortia,  with  a  thin  belt  of  Cordia  and  central  Pisonia 
groves  (a  bilobed  pattern  on  Arundel).  Morinda  is  unusually 
common  in  Arundel's  central  forests,  and  Achyranthes  is 
especially  abundant  on  North  Arundel.  Pisonia  occupies  only 
13%  of  the  land  area  on  Arundel,  compared  to  46%  on  Pig. 
Soils  are  extremely  rubbly .  with  scant  organic  matter,  a  possible 
legacy  of  the  guano  era. 

Both  North  Arundel  and  Arundel  were  heavily  planted 
with  Cocos  in  1919-20  (69  and  646  palms,  respectively).  All 
usable  land  was  cleared  (Table  13).  Despite  the  extreme 
paucity  of  Cocos  today,  the  relatively  scant  Pisonia  present 
today  on  these  islets,  compared  to  those  further  north,  suggests 
that  the  Cocos  plantations  were  more  successful  here.  Their 
proximity  to  South  probably  also  guaranteed  better  maintenance. 

Birds:  Five  species  of  seabirds  bred  on  Arundel:  red- 
footed  booby  (37  pairs),  great  frigatebird  (on  territory, 
September  1988;  breeding  confirmed,  early  1989  by  Anne 
Falconer),  brown  noddy  (1 1  pairs),  black  noddy  (249  pairs). 
and  white  tern  (227  pairs).  In  May  1990,  thousands  of  sooty 
terns  swarmed  above  Arundel  and  North  Arundel. 

15.  TRIDACNA  ISLET  (9.08  ha)  (Figs.  29.48,49; 
Pis.  1,26.48.62.63) 

The  13th  and  southernmost  motu  in  the  windward  chain 
was  named  by  the  present  authors  and  Boris  Sirenko  for  its 
outstanding  coral  reef  studded  with  giant  clams  {Tridacna 
maxima). 

Physiography:  Somewhat  crescentic.  measuring  446  m 
long  and  250  m  wide,  Tridacna  is  one  of  the  largest  motus  on 
Caroline.  Its  ground  surface  is  heavily  littered  with  coral 
rubble,  having  a  sandy  strip  above  the  beach  crest  on  the 
windward  edge. 

Vegetation:  There  are  1 3  plant  species  (2  trees,  2  shrubs, 
9  herbs),  48%  of  the  atoll's  flora.  For  its  size,  Tridacna's 
\  egetation  is  surprisingly  lacking  in  tall  forests,  a  legacy  of  the 
910  Cocos  palms  planted  on  82%  of  its  available  land  area 
(Table  13).  Vegetation  patterns  follow  the  usual  concentric 
zonation:  peripheral  herb  mats  border  a  discontinuous  belt  of 
Suriana  (windward  side),  while  the  large  central  mass  is 
dominated  by  scrubby  Toumefortia— Morinda  woodlands, 
which  cover  88%  of  the  islet's  area,  yet  only  attain  7  m  in 
height.  In  cross-section  (Fig.  49).  the  short  woodlands  are 
particularly  noticeable.  Compare  the  present  lack  of  Cordia. 


40 


paucity  of  Pisonia,  and  richness  of  herbs,  both  in  species 
numbers  and  abundance,  with  Pig  (Fig.  45)  and  Brothers 
(Fig.  46).  Although  there  are  no  introduced  plants,  thick 
patches  of  Lepturus  also  reflect  past  forest  clearing. 

Birds:  Fourspeciesof  seabirds  were  nesting  in  1988:  red- 
footed  booby  (111  pairs),  brown  noddy  ( 1 1  pairs),  black  noddy 
(249  pairs),  and  white  tern  (227  pairs).  Tridacna  is  periodically 
a  major  breeding  area  for  sooty  terns.  Clapp&  Sibley  (1971a) 
found  4  main  colonies  totaling  250,000  birds,  and  large  numbers 
nested  along  the  windward  beach  in  August  1 989  (A.  Falconer, 
personal  communication).  Nests  were  located  under  shrubs,  or 
in  open  areas  bordering  them,  and  were  evidently  preyed  upon 
by  coconut  crabs. 

16.  SOUTH  ISLAND  (104.41  ha)  (Figs.  30,36,50; 
Pis.  1-7,12,16,24,34,39,44,45,50,62) 

History:  The  history  of  South  Island  (called  Rimapoto  in 
Young,  ca.  1 922)  is  essentially  the  history  of  Caroline,  for  most 
information  about  the  atoll  prior  to  1965  is  from  here.  It  is  the 
second  largest  islet,  and  the  staging  area  for  trips  up-lagoon  as 
it  lies  adjacent  to  both  the  "boat  landing"  and  "blind  passage." 

South  Island  was  inhabited  in  prehistory  by  Tuamotuans, 
who  planted  the  first  small  coconut  grove  on  its  northwest 
point.  The  first  Europeans  to  land,  in  1606,  found  coconuts, 
fish,  lobsters,  and  seabirds  in  abundance.  They  dug  for  fresh 
water  in  vain.  Two  hundred  years  later,  in  the  decade  after  a 
cyclone  in  1825,  pigs,  sweet  potatoes,  arrowroot,  and  South 
Sea  chestnut  were  introduced.  However,  "the  unfriendly 
character  of  the  soil,  and  the  number  of  land  crabs  that  infest  it, 
gave  us  but  little  hope  of  the  experiment  succeeding"  ( Bennett, 
1840).  The  pigs  expired  within  a  few  years.  The  arrowroot, 
tenacious  and  adapted  to  island  environments,  still  exists  today 
(unless  later  immigrants  brought  it).  Of  the  others — plus  many 
other  later  food  plants  and  ornamentals — no  trace  exists 
(Table  1).  (In  1990,  we  found  a  few  Hibiscus  tiliaceus, 
Thespesia  populnea,  and  Ximenia  americana.  All  could  be 
indigenous.  The  first  2  species  were  often  planted  by  Polynesians 
in  copra-cutting  settlements  [e.g.,  Flint  Island]).  Tropical  heat, 
droughts,  storms,  excessive  shade  from  Cocos,  poor 
germination,  poor  soils,  terrestrial  crabs,  and  lack  of  care  all 
undoubtedly  contributed  to  their  demise. 

The  first  recorded  settlement  on  Caroline,  and  first  for  the 
Line  Islands,  was  in  1846,  on  the  northwest  point.  These 
settlers,  as  well  as  subsequent  ones,  eked  out  a  spartan  living  by 
raising  stock,  drying  fish  and  copra,  and  digging  for  guano. 
Their  managers  built  "proper"  dwellings,  so  when  US.  British, 
and  French  astronomers  arrived  to  observe  the  solar  eclipse  in 
May  1 883.  South  Island  was  quite  "civilized,"  far  more  than  it 
is  today.  Three  houses  and  two  sheds  "were  in  good  repair," 
and  a  variety  of  "anchors,  chains,  spars,  and  pieces  of  the 
woodwork  of  vessels"  littered  its  reefs  ( Holden  &  Qualtrough, 
1884).  Large  grassy  clearings  adjacent  to  the  lagoon 
accommodated  several  European-style  houses  (Pis.  2—4).  The 
astronomers'  account  of  South  Island,  illustrated  with  pen- 
and-ink  drawings  (Pis.  2-5,50),  is  the  only  record  of  buildings 
on  Caroline,  apart  from  mention  of  perhaps  the  same  dwelling, 
the  manager's  house,  reported  in   1936  by  the  "H.M.S." 


Wellington  to  be  "in  excellent  condition  and  spotlessly  clean" 
(Maude,  ca.  1938),  and  a  copra  shed  seen  by  Clapp  &  Sibley 
(1971a).  Arundel  also  took  photographs,  including  some  of  the 
marae  on  Nake,  which  we  have  not  examined  (Arundel's 
memorabilia  [photos,  letters,  diaries,  a  microfilm,  et  cetera]  are 
deposited  in  the  Rare  Book  Collection,  National  Library  and 
Pacific  Manuscripts  Bureau,  Research  School  of  Pacific  Studies, 
Australian  National  University,  both  in  Canberra.  A.C.T., 
Australia). 

Today,  the  houses,  sheds,  brick  piers  (constructed  in  1883 
for  telescopes  and  observatory  frames),  signboard,  flagpole, 
marble  slab  with  inscription  "U.S.  Eclipse  Party,  1883, 
May  6,"  and  all  but  one  of  the  introduced  plants  have 
disappeared.  In  three  trips  we  found  no  traces  of  the  copra  shed, 
nor  have  the  Falconers,  after  repeated  visits  over  2  years.  All 
that  remains  of  the  formerly  large  clearings  are  two  small  palm- 
shaded  "flats."  in  1988  used  by  the  US  and  Soviet  scientists  for 
a  base  camp  and  work  area.  In  1987,  the  Falconers  cleared  one 
of  these  for  living  quarters,  and  in  1 990  fishermen  expanded  the 
other  by  burning  an  area  35  x  22  m,  then  erecting  a  tin  shack, 
cookhouse,  and  fishtrap,  which  were  destroyed  in  a  summer 
1990  storm. 

Our  "civilization  list"  probably  covered  all  that  could  be 
seen  on  South  Island  without  digging:  a  26-foot  wrecked  sloop 
( AK  669 1  J. ),  complete  with  trail  to  a  "Robinson  Crusoe-type" 
campsite  strewn  with  remnants  of  radio  and  navigational 
equipment,  sail,  cans,  clothing,  et  cetera  (southeast  coast); 
assorted  flotsam  and  jetsam  ( whisky  bottles,  Japanese  fishballs, 
plastic  debris,  et  cetera);  a  large  rubber  ship  fender;  a  bench 
mark  from  the  1 985  RNZAF  survey  team;  a  recently  renovated 
concrete  cistern  (by  the  landing);  and  an  old  wooden  canoe 
lying  on  its  side  just  like  de  Quiros  found  in  1606! 

We  assume  that  all  the  Polynesians,  ancient  and  recent 
(Tuamotuans,  Tahitians,  Niueans  as  far  as  is  known),  lived  in 
native  thatched  huts  similar  to  the  ones  on  Ana-Ana  today. 
Fashioned  from  coconut  palms  and  pandanus  trees,  they 
disappear  quickly  when  abandoned.  The  largest  number  of 
inhabitants  recorded  for  Caroline  ( probably  all  on  South  Island ) 
was  "two  managers  and  52  laborers"  in  1873  (The  Commercial 
Advertiser,  1873). 

The  history  of  South  Island's  coconut  plantations  from 
1885  to  1901  and  from  1916  to  1929  is  discussed  under 
Coconut  Woodlands  (Plant  Communities  section). 

Physiography:  South  Island  forms  the  base  of  the  thinly 
crescentic  isosceles  triangle  whose  limits  define  the  atoll.  Its 
own  shape  is  that  of  an  irregular  parallelogram 
858  m  wide  x  1 ,254  m  long  at  its  longest  points  (Fig.  50).  The 
north  coast,  a  curved  bay,  forms  the  lower  boundary  of  the 
lagoon.  This  shore,  along  with  the  adjacent  northwest 
peninsula,  has  been  the  most  trodden  by  man,  but  the  scars 
have  healed,  leaving  few  traces  beyond  the  presence  of 
coconut  palms. 

The  reef  flats  surrounding  the  outer  three  sides  of  South  are 
the  widest  on  the  atoll,  averaging  23 1  m,  578  m,  and  363  m  on 
the  east,  south,  and  west,  respectively.  The  windward  and 
leeward  reefs  immediately  to  its  north  are  530  m  wide.  To 
leeward  is  the  small  boat  "landing,"  and  to  windward,  the 
"blind  passage." 


41 


Aesthetically,  the  lagoon  fringe  is  one  of  the  most 
picturesque  spots  on  the  atoll.  Lush  palms  overhang  a  narrow 
beach  of  blinding  white  sand  and  coral  gravel,  affording  idyllic 
views  of  the  azure  lagoon  and  its  encircling  wooded  motus 
(Pis.  7,24,39). 

Vegetation:  There  are  23  plant  species  (7  trees,  3  shrubs, 
13  herbs),  85%  of  the  atoll's  flora.  Cocos  dominates  South 
Island,  occupying  77%  of  its  area.  The  healthy,  but  old,  closed- 
canopy  plantations  (21  m  tall )  that  border  its  coastlines  give  no 
indication  of  the  vast  extent  of  the  overgrown,  dying  groves 
that  occupy  two-thirds  of  its  interior  ( Fig.  50;  Pis.  7,  34).  Here, 
three  species  of  herbs  (Boerhavia  repens,  Portulaca  lutea, 
Phymatosorus  scolopendha)  have  proliferated  unnaturally  to 
form  dense  carpets,  and  the  vine  lpomoea  macrantha  climbs, 
in  tangled,  strangling  masses,  to  the  tops  of  the  highest  palms. 

The  natural  communities  that  prevail  on  other  motus  are 
only  minor  components  on  South  (Fig.  50):  herb  mats  (13%  of 
the  total  area),  coastal  scrub  with  Suriana  ( 1  % ),  and  Tournefortia 
scrub  (4%).  Conspicuously  absent  are  prime  scrublands  and 
forests  of  Tournefortia,  Pisonia,  and  Cordia,  which  undoubtedly 
once  swept  in  a  lush  expanse  from  shore  to  shore,  stratified  and 
zoned  as  on  other  motus.  Canopy  heights  of  the  plantations  are 
uniform  (21  m).  and  the  outer  fringe  of  indigenous  scrub 
(Tournefortia,  Cordia,  Suriana)  and  herbs  (fleliotropium, 
Portulaca)  occupy  a  small  proportion  of  the  island's  width 
(Figs.  36,51).  Note  the  abrupt  transition  of  canopy  heights  as 
they  drop  to  the  level  of  coastal  scrub  on  both  sides  of  the 
plantation  (Fig.  51).  Pandanus,  too,  is  less  extensive  than 
formerly:  Bennett  (1840)  called  Pandanus  "somewhat 
numerous"  and  PI.  50  reproduces  an  1883  painting  of  a  grove, 
denser  than  any  existing  today  on  South.  During  our  survey ,  we 
observed  only  one  small  Pandanus  grove  and  a  few  scattered 
trees.  Bennett  also  noted  that  the  island  was  "covered  with 
verdure,"  and  there  were  "trees  attaining  the  height  of  twenty 
feet."  However,  it  is  well  to  recall  that  9  or  10  years  previous 
to  Bennett's  visit  a  violent  storm  had  whipped  over  the  atoll. 
Drawings  from  1883  (Pis.  4,5)  depict  remnant  Tournefortia 
and  Pisonia  trees  larger  than  this. 

Apart  from  the  coastal  buffer  zone,  little  native  forest 
remains.  Other  sizable  trees  (Pisonia.  Cordia),  up  to  17  m  tall, 
are  rare,  but  Morinda,  tolerant  to  both  sun  and  shade,  is  still 
quite  common.  Though  we  have  not  been  able  to  trace  any 
records  to  Caroline,  it  is  possible  that  shiploads  of  Cordia  logs 
were  exported  to  San  Francisco  on  guano  ships,  as  was  the  case 
on  Flint,  worked  simultaneously  by  Arundel's  company  (Young, 
ca.  1922). 

A  final  noteworthy  aspect  of  South  Island  is  that,  despite 
its  history  of  sporadic  occupation  and  extensive  forest  felling 
for  coconut  plantations,  only  one  "weed,"  a  tiny  patch  of 
Phyllanthus  amarus,  and  no  vegetable  or  garden  ornamentals 
(excluding  Polynesian  introductions)  have  survived.  (We  are 
unsure  of  the  status  of  Hibiscus  tiliaceus,  Thespesia populnea, 
or  Ximenia  americana).  The  19th  century  gardens,  once 
drenched  in  sunshine,  have  long  been  buried  beneath  the  deep 
shade  of  palm  groves  (compare  Pis.  2  and  24).  In  addition, 
periodic  storms,  droughts,  irregular  rainfall,  nutrient-poor  soils, 
rats,  land  crabs,  and  the  harsh  salty  environment  must  have 
contributed  to  the  eradication  of  all  exotics  except  traditional 


native  food  and  medicine  plants,  which  are  specifically  adapted 
for  atoll  environments.  Studies  on  other  atolls,  even  those  near 
high  islands  (Stoddart  &  Fosberg,  1972;  Stoddart  &  Gibbs, 
1 975 ),  have  demonstrated  also  that  exotics  survive,  despite  the 
proximity  to  source  areas  containing  garden  ornamentals  and 
weed  plants.  We  learned  on  our  last  two  visits  ( March  and  May 
1990),  however,  that  a  small  sunny  clearing  around  the  cistern 
has  attracted  one  clump  of  a  weed  not  previously  reported 
(Kyllinga  brevifolia),  also  the  location  of  Phyllanthus.  This 
area  is  now  used  as  an  extension  of  the  Falconers'  vegetable 
garden  on  Motu  Ana-Ana.  Kyllinga  is  listed  as  a  temporary 
species  (Table  1 ). 

Birds:  Only  2  species  of  birds  bred  on  South  in  September 
1988,  a  reflection  of  its  paucity  of  natural  habitats:  brown 
noddy  (163  pairs)  and  white  tern  (381  pairs).  Bristle-thighed 
curlews  are  very  common,  gathering  in  small  flocks  on  the 
rubbly  shores  (Subchapter  1 .2,  this  volume).  They  also  forage 
in  the  open  Ipomoea-Cocos  forest,  perching  on  dead  coconut 
stumps  6-10  m  high,  then  flying  down  to  feed  in  the  thick  herb 
mats. 

Terrestrial  Crabs:  Caroline's  highest  population  of  coconut 
crabs,  having  many  huge  individuals  decades  old.  occupies  the 
open  Cocos  forests  (Pis.  22,56,57 ).  A  crude  minimum  estimate 
for  South  Island  is  500  mature  individuals  (since  March  1990. 
these  have  become  much  reduced  due  to  killing  and  preserving 
in  formalin  for  curios).  We  also  found  a  fist-sized  blue  hermit 
crab  within  a  Turbo  shell,  possibly  Coenobita  brevimanus 
(Yaldwyn  &  Wodzicki,  1979;  E.  Reese,  personal 
communication).  As  elsewhere  on  the  atoll,  land  crabs  such  as 
the  reddish-purple  Cardisoma  sp.  and  scarlet  hermit  crabs, 
Coenobita  perlatus  (in  Turbo  argyrostomus  shells),  were 
abundant  ( PI.  38).  A  Geograpsus  sp.,  closer  to  the  shore,  was 
less  common. 

Rats:  Polynesian  rats  were  abundant  on  South,  active  both 
day  and  night.  The  rats  were  constantly  afoot  in  broad  daylight, 
and  at  night  a  small  flashlight  beam  often  revealed  a  half  dozen 
at  a  time. 

South  Nake  Islets  (Fig.  52) 

This  chain  of  seven  islets  extends  1,500  m  south  from 
Nake  on  the  west  side.  They  range  in  size  from  0.64  ha  ( Kota) 
to  7.36  ha  (Pandanus).  All  are  well  wooded  and  support  every 
natural  plant  community.  Proceeding  south,  the  overall  plant 
cover  thins  somewhat,  but  not  to  the  dryness  and  openness  of 
the  Central  Leeward  Islets.  The  herb  mats  are  more  extensive 
than  on  the  windward  islets,  especially  to  seaward.  Aboriginal 
introductions  (Cocos,  Pandanus)  are  sparse.  We  have  found 
no  historical  records  indicating  human  disturbance  to  these 
islets,  thus  their  vegetation,  with  the  possible  exception  of 
Pandanus  Islet,  is  evidently  natural.  The  two  scrawny  Cocos 
are  probably  drift-derived. 

On  the  Solar  Eclipse  Party's  map  of  Caroline  (Fig.  5),  only 
the  top  two  islets  of  this  group  are  drawn.  The  South  Nake  Islets 
constitute  the  only  cluster  of  motus  that  show  appreciable 
differences  between  Arundel's  chart  (Fig.  4)  and  the  1985 
aerial  photos:  most  were  shown  as  smaller,  and  with  slightly 
different  shapes,  by  Arundel.  The  interior  vegetation  on  these 
motus  includes  mature  forests  of  Tournefortia.  Pisonia,  and 


42 


Pandanus,  so  it  is  unlikely  that  these  differences  reflect  changes 
to  the  center  of  the  motus.  However,  since  the  islets  now  appear 
larger,  accretions  of  coral  rubble  and  sand  that  may  have 
occurred  in  the  past  105  years,  and  are  now  barren  or  covered 
only  with  herb  mats,  could  account  for  most  of  the  differences 
(see  Coral  Islet  discussion). 

Although  we  have  no  actual  records  of  sooty  tern  colonies 
on  this  chain  of  islets,  in  May  1990  AKK  observed  pre- 
breeding  swirls  of  this  species  over  Lone  Palm,  Kota,  and 
Mouakena  (Subchapter  1.2,  Fig.  1 1 ). 

17.  PANDANUS  ISLET  (7.36  ha)  (Figs.  29,52;  PI.  64) 

This  motu  was  named  by  the  present  authors  for  its  coastal 
Pandanus  grove,  probably  a  drift-derived  offshoot  from  a 
parent  colony  on  Nake. 

Physiography:  Pandanus  Islet,  first  in  the  chain,  is 
irregularly  oval,  400  m  long  and  258  m  across.  It  is  nearly  twice 
the  size  shown  on  Arundel's  map  (ca.  3.4  ha).  It  occupies  a 
sheltered  spot  at  the  apex  of  the  lagoon.  Sand,  actively  filling 
in  the  adjacent  lagoon,  is  an  important  component  of  the 
substrate  on  Pandanus,  extending  one-third  of  the  way  across 
the  islet.  Although  tidal  reef  flats  are  absent  on  the  lagoon  edge, 
they  average  75  m  wide  on  the  seaward  side,  producing  a  fairly 
high  proportion  of  rubble  compared  to  the  total  land  surface 
(32%). 

Vegetation:  Plant  species  total  10  (3  trees,  1  shrub, 
6  herbs),  37%  of  Caroline's  flora.  Cocus,  surprisingly,  is 
absent,  despite  the  close  proximity  to  Nake.  Pandanus  Islet  has 
four  basic  vegetation  zones:  natural  herb  mats,  Toumefortia 
scrub  (with  Pandanus),  Tournefortia-Pisonia  forest,  and  pure 
Pisonia.  Woodlands  cover  62%  of  its  area.  The  widest  pioneer 
mats  ( 13  m)  of  any  leeward  motu  occupy  its  east  edge  and 
though  sparsely  vegetated  (20%  Heliotropium,  5%  Lepturus, 
5%  Portulaca)  reflect  active  growth  toward  the  lagoon. 
Proceeding  west  across  the  island,  Toumefortia  scrub  (2  m 
high),  with  pockets  of  pure  Pandanus  (10m  high),  merges  into 
Tournefortia-Pisonia  forest  (to  14  m  high),  whose  bimodal 
distribution  suggests  that  the  islet  was  once  divided.  The 
seaward  coast  supports  open  Toumefortia  (5  m  high),  beneath 
which  herbs  eventually  thin  out  onto  the  extensive  reef  flats. 

Birds:  Five  species  of  seabirds  breed:  masked  booby 
(2  pairs),  red-footed  booby  (32  pairs),  great  frigatebird 
(26  pairs),  brown  noddy  (26  pairs),  and  white  tern  (52  pairs). 

Comments:  Skinks  and  rats  were  observed,  along  with  the 
ubiquitous  Coenobita  and  Cardisoma  crabs. 

18.  DANGER  ISLET  (2.71  ha)  (Figs.  29,52;  PI.  65,68) 

We  named  Danger  Islet  to  commemorate  the  deep,  shark- 
infested  channel  to  its  north,  a  barrier  that  aborted  our  first 
(dusk)  attempt  to  survey  the  South  Nake  Islets. 

Physiography:  Danger,  shaped  like  a  thickened  comma,  is 
approximately  150  m  long  and  215  m  wide.  It  is  composed 
almost  entirely  of  coral  rubble;  interior  humus  is  scant.  Its  reef- 
channel  flats  are  21  m  (north)  and  14  m  (south)  wide.  The  east 


and  west  beaches,  narrow  and  wide  respectively,  are  typical  of 
all  the  leeward  motus. 

Vegetation:  Danger  has  10  plant  species  (3  trees,  1  shrub, 
6  herbs),  37%  of  the  total  flora.  There  are  no  introductions.  The 
usual  concentric  vegetation  is  clearly  zoned:  herb  mats, 
Toumefortia  scrub  and  forest,  central  Pisonia,  and  Cordia  in 
the  southwest.  The  herb  mats  are  wide,  extending  22  m  and 
15  m  on  the  north  and  south  shores,  respectively. 

Birds:   Four  species  of  nesting  seabirds  were  present  in 
1988:  red-footed  booby  (139  pairs),  great 
frigatebird  (26  pairs),  brown  noddy  (26  pairs),  and  white  tern 
(52  pairs). 

19.  BOOBY  ISLET  (0.84  ha)  (Figs.  29,52;  PI.  66) 

We  named  this  motu,  third  in  the  chain,  for  its  two  species 
of  boobies,  the  common  red-footed  and  rarer  masked  booby. 

Physiography:  Booby,  shaped  like  a  teardrop,  is  70  m  long 
and  1 25  m  wide.  Its  coral  rubble  flats  extend  1 0  m  and  30  m  on 
the  north  and  south  sides,  respectively. 

Vegetation:  Despite  its  small  size,  the  most  notable 
feature  of  Booby  is  its  Pisonia  forest.  20  m  tall  and  undoubtedly 
virgin.  It  occupies  the  exact  center  of  the  islet  in  a  circle  about 
40  m  in  diameter.  Surrounding  this  is  Toumefortia  scrub  (to 
8  m  tall),  thinning  out  to  peripheral  bands  of  coral  rubble. 
Although  less  than  one  hectare  in  size.  Booby  Islet's  woodlands 
occupy  two-thirds  of  this  area.  Booby  Islet  has  nine  species  of 
plants  (two  trees,  one  shrub,  six  herbs),  33%  of  Caroline's 
flora,  and  no  introductions. 

Birds:  Five  species  of  seabirds  breed:  masked  booby 
(7  pairs),  red-footed  booby  (52  pairs),  brown  noddy  (2  pairs), 
black  noddy  ( 1  pair),  and  white  tern  (6  pairs). 

20.  CORAL  ISLET  (1.70  ha)  (Figs.  29,52;  PI.  66) 

Fourth  from  the  north.  Coral  Islet  was  named  for  its  reef- 
derived  coralline  substrate. 

Physiography:  Shaped  like  an  arrowhead,  Coral  is 
approximately  130  m  long  by  200  m  wide,  more  than  three 
times  the  size  mapped  by  Arundel  (Fig.  4).  Most  of  its  area  is 
barely  higher  than  the  surrounding  interislet  channels.  The 
shallow  reef  flats  between  Coral  and  its  two  southern  motus  are 
only  several  centimeters  deep  at  low  tide;  all  three  may  be 
destined  to  unite.  Unless  closely  inspected,  they  appear  to  have 
already  merged,  a  fact  which,  together  with  Bryan's  incorrect 
map  (Fig.  6),  helps  account  for  the  widely  differing  number  of 
motus  attributed  to  Caroline. 

Vegetation:  There  are  nine  species  of  plants  (two  trees, 
one  shrub,  six  herbs),  33%  of  Caroline's  flora,  and  no 
introductions  are  present.  Plant  communities  comprise  a  small 
Pisonia  forest  (0. 1 3  ha),  which  is  surrounded  by  the  predominant 
Toumefortia,  which  in  turn  is  fringed  with  a  narrow  band  of 
native  herbs.  "Soils"  are  extremely  coarse. 

Birds:  Five  species  of  seabirds  bred  in  1988:  masked 
booby  (1  pair),  red-footed  booby  (28  pairs),  great  frigatebird 
(2  pairs),  brown  noddy  (6  pairs),  and  white  tern  (15  pairs). 


43 


21.  LONE  PALM  ISLET  (1.99  ha)  (Figs.  29,52;  Pis.  66-68) 

We  named  Lone  Palm,  fifth  in  the  chain,  for  its  single 
coconut  palm,  which  towers,  Hag-like,  above  a  dense  mound  of 
Towmefortia. 

Physiography:  Similar  to  Kota  (to  its  south),  Lone  Palm 
is  sausage-shaped,  97  m  long  and  240  m  wide,  and  four  times 
the  size  mapped  by  Arundel.  Although  composed  almost 
entirely  of  coral  rubble,  some  sand  borders  the  lagoon.  Following 
a  pattern  prevalent  on  all  the  leeward  motus,  its  lagoon  beach 
is  2  m  wide,  while  the  seaward  beach  is  17  m. 

Vegetation:  Eleven  species  of  plants  are  present  (three 
trees,  one  shrub,  seven  herbs).  46%  of  Caroline's  flora.  Lone 
Palm's  plant  communities  are  simple:  a  wide  band  of  herb  mats 
and  open  Toumefortia  flanks  an  oval  of  Towmefortia  forest  (to 
1 0  m  tall ).  A  line  of  Pisonia  trees,  with  a  lone  Cocos  surmounting 
the  scrub,  easily  identifies  this  islet  from  lagoon  or  ocean. 

Birds:  Three  species  of  seabirds  bred  in  1988:  masked 
booby  (2  pairs),  red-footed  booby  (48  pairs),  and  white  tern 
(9  pairs).  In  May  1990,  we  saw  a  large  prebreeding  swarm  of 
sooty  terns. 

22.  MOTU   KOTA    -Red-footed  Booby  Islet"  (0.64  ha) 
(Figs.  28,52:  Pis.  66.68) 

We  named  this  motu  for  its  high  density  of  red-footed 
boobies  (kota  in  Gilbertese). 

Physiography:  Sixth  in  line  south  of  Nake,  sausage- 
shaped  Motu  Kota  is  50  m  long  and  175  m  wide.  At  low  tide 
it  is  almost  connected  to  Motu  Mouakena.  Both  surveys 
indicate  that  coral  rubble,  the  islet' s  predominant  substrate,  had 
further  accumulated  on  its  south  side  since  the  1985  aerial 
photos  and  also  since  1988. 

Vegetation:  Though  barely  wooded.  Kota  has  1 1  species 
of  plants  (3  trees,  1  shrub,  7  herbs).  41%  of  Caroline's  flora. 
One  introduction  is  present,  a  single,  tattered  Cocos,  partly 
hidden  by  vegetation.  Two  plant  communities  are  present: 
peripheral  herb  mats  and  central  Toumefortia  scrub  (to  10  m 
tall |.  with  a  few  Pisonia. 

Birds:  Three  species  of  seabirds  bred  in  1988:  brown 
booby  (1  pair),  red-footed  booby  (12  pairs),  and  white  tern 
(3  pairs).  In  May  1990,  a  single  masked  booby  was  on  territory, 
and  sooty  terns  swirled  overhead. 

23.  MOTU  MOUAKENA  "Masked  Booby  Islet"  ( 1 .00  ha) 
(Figs.  29,52;  Pis.  15.69) 

This  islet  was  named  for  its  nesting  masked  boobies,  a 
relatively  uncommon  seabird  on  Caroline. 

Physiography:  Somewhat  U-shaped,  Motu  Mouakena  is 
seventh,  and  southernmost,  in  the  South  Nake  chain  of  islets. 
Both  sides  of  the  "U"  were,  in  the  recent  past,  separate  islets. 
By  joining  on  the  west,  a  narrow,  V-shaped  inlet  was  created  on 
the  lagoon  side.  Motu  Mouakena.  100  m  long  and  1 60  m  wide. 
is  extremely  nubbly  ami  infertile;  much  rubble  was  reorganized 
during  the  February  1990  storm.  Seventeen  meters  to  its  south 
lies  a  newly  emerging  shoal  of  sand  and  gravel  (PI.  15),  perhaps 
destined  to  be  Caroline's  fortieth  motu  or  perhaps  part  of 


Mouakena' s  southern  shore.  Since  the  above  storm,  rubble  has 
further  accumulated  on  this  shoal,  its  adjacent  reef  Oats,  and  the 
channel  separating  it  from  Mouakena.  It  already  supports  one 
Toumefortia  shrub,  two  dozen  Heliotropium  plants,  and  very 
scattered  Lepturus  and  Portulaca. 

Vegetation:  The  number  of  species  is  eight  ( one  tree,  one 
shrub,  six  herbs),  30%  of  Caroline's  flora,  with  no  introductions. 
Mouakena  is  thinly  vegetated  with  open  Toumefortia  scrub  (to 
9  m  tall,  26%  cover),  a  few  small  Pisonia.  and  very  sparse  herb 
mats. 

Birds:  Mouakena  has  less  vegetation  and  fewer  birds  than 
might  be  expected  from  a  consideration  of  its  area  because 
much  of  it  is  unshaded,  coarse  coral  rubble.  Though 
unproductive  botanically,  this  provides  ideal  nesting  grounds 
for  masked  boobies,  one  of  the  two  species  of  breeding  seabirds 
on  the  islet  in  1988:  masked  booby  (3  pairs)  and  red-footed 
booby  (8  pairs).  In  May  1990,  we  saw  one  great  frigatebird  nest 
with  eggs  and  a  swirl  of  sooty  terns. 

Central  Leeward  Islets 

This  chain  of  1 1  motus  occupies  the  central  west  side  of 
Caroline.  All  are  separated  by  channels,  wadable  only  at  low 
tide  but  prowled  by  belligerent  sharks.  Approximately 
1.600  m  south  of  Motu  Mouakena  lies  a  sandy  shoal  (0.5  m 
high.  7  m  wide.  4  m  long),  close  to  the  lagoon  edge  of  the  reef 
flats  and  connected  only  by  a  thin  thread  of  rubble  to  Motu 
Mannikiba  to  its  south. 

The  islets  range  in  size  from  Mannikiba  (28.50  ha),  the 
most  northerly,  to  Fishball  (0.46  ha),  the  most  southerly.  All 
support  good  seabird  populations  and.  though  quite  well  wooded. 
are  nonetheless  the  least  lush  motus  on  Caroline.  Historical 
records  of  the  Central  Leewards  are  very  scant:  much  of 
Mannikiba's  forest  was  felled  to  make  room  for  a  Cocos 
seedling  "nursery"  (Young,  ca.  1922).  The  bulk  of  "40  trees  on 
other  islets."  in  Young's  totals,  were  most  likely  from  Shark 
and  Emerald.  The  rest  of  this  group  is  evidently  pristine;  the 
natural  communities  on  Bird  Islet,  in  particular,  are  in  excellent 
condition. 

Shark  Islet  boasts  the  best  sandy  beach  on  the  atoll. 
In  common  with  all  the  motus  on  Caroline's  west  rim. 
their  lagoonside  beaches  are  narrow  and  leeward  reef 
Hats  wide.  The  leeward  flats  are  composed  of  a  greater 
variety  of  substrata  than  the  former,  including  coral  rubble 
of  several  grades  (always  gray),  upraised  reef,  and 
beachrock.  Periodically,  thousands  of  nesting  sooty 
terns  occupy  their  open  spaces  (Clapp  &  Sibley.  1971a: 
AKK,  personal  observation;  Anne  Falconer,  personal 
communication). 

24.    MOTU   MANNIKIBA    "Seabird  Islet"   (21.49   ha) 
(Fig.  29;  Pis.  70-72) 

We  named  this  motu  for  its  teeming  seabirds,  mannikiba 
in  Gilbertese. 

Physiography:  Largest  and  most  northerly  of  the  Central 
Leeward  Islets.  Mannikiba  is  somewhat  rectangular  with 
rounded  corners.  Its  reel  Hats,  containing  an  incipient  islet, 
stretch  2.0  km  north  to  the  South  Nake  Islets. 


44 


Mannikiha's  maximum  dimensions  are  700  m  long  and 
375  m  wide.  On  the  lagoon  side,  the  serub  skirts  high  water,  but 
when  the  tide  drops,  a  strip  of  blinding  white  sandy  coral  lines 
the  lagoon.  To  seaward,  upraised  reef,  beachrock,  and  successive 
layers  of  gray  coral  rubble  stretch  in  a  wide  swath  (40  m) 
toward  the  outer  reef,  130  m  distant.  Throughout  the  islet  the 
substratum  is  gray  coral  rubble,  with  some  exposed  reef  flat 
hardpan  in  the  northeast.  Having  numerous  seabirds,  this  motu 
might  have  also  contained  productive  guano  deposits. 

Vegetation:  Mannikiba,  the  fourth  largest  motu,  harbors 
1 3  plant  species:  (4  trees,  2  shrubs,  7  herbs),  48%  of  Caroline's 
flora.  One  of  its  shrubs  (Species  A),  a  new  record  for  Caroline, 
has  yet  to  be  identified.  The  only  introduction  is  Cocos, 
occupying  0.1%  of  the  land  area. 

Mannikiba' s  vegetation,  denser  toward  the  north  end,  is 
clearly  zoned:  herb  mats,  Tournefortia  scrub  and  forest,  and 
scattered  Pisonia  groves.  The  few  clumps  of  peripheral  Cocos 
are  probably  not  drift-derived  but  the  remnants  of  6,000  "seed 
sets"  brought  from  Flint  Island  in  June  1920.  These  were  stored 
on  Mannikiba  and  "used  to  replant  misses  on  other  islets" 
(Young,  ca.  1922). 

Pisonia,  though  present,  occupies  only  5%  of  the  land 
area,  a  small  percentage  for  such  a  large  islet.  This  suggests  that 
a  large  portion  of  the  interior  forests  were  felled  to  accommodate 
the  coconut  "sets."  This  is  also  confirmed  by  the  presence  of 
several  old  cut  stumps  in  the  interior.  A  century  ago,  Holden 
&  Qualtrough  ( 1 884)  noted  that  "About  one-third  the  distance 
up  the  lagoon  a  canvas  hut  exists  on  one  of  the  smaller  islets  on 
the  eastern  side  of  the  lagoon,  and  two  wooden  huts  stand  on 
one  of  the  western  islets,  some  distance  further  up  the  lagoon." 
Mannikiba,  the  largest  western  islet,  situated  about  halfway  up 
the  lagoon,  was  most  likely  the  site  of  the  wooden  huts,  erected 
around  1 920  and  used  for  the  following  few  years  when  the  new 
company,  S.  R.  Maxwell  &  Co.,  Ltd.,  was  anxious  for  the 
success  of  Caroline's  plantations.  Although  nothing  more  is 
known  of  Mannikiba's  history,  collection  of  guano  from  its 
numerous  seabirds,  including  large  populations  of  frigatebirds 
and  sooty  terns,  may  account  for  further  past  disturbance. 

Transect  1  ( north-central  sector,  PI .  7 1 )  passed  through  the 
heart  of  a  fine  interior  forest,  while  Tr.  2  (south-central  sector) 
passed  through  scrub  and  herb  mats,  which  may  represent  part 
of  the  former  Cocos  "nursery."  Profiles  through  these  two 
cross-island  transects  resemble  those  from  Brothers  (Fig.  46) 
and  an  old  interisland  channel  on  Long  (Fig.  40),  respectively. 

The  low,  peripheral  herb  mats  (absent  from  the  lagoon 
side)  are  composed  of  30%  Heliotropium,  20%  Boerhavia, 
1 5%  Tournefortia,  and  less  than  1  %  of  Portulaca  and  Laportea. 
They  are  best  represented  in  the  southern  sector.  The 
Tournefortia  forest,  6  m  high  on  both  sides,  is  thick,  having 
95%  canopy  coverage.  The  Pisonia  forests,  though  fragmented 
(12m  high,  1 00%  canopy  cover),  contain  Morinda,  Boerhavia, 
Achyranthes,  Laportea,  and  Phymatosorus,  but  none  cover 
more  than  1 0%  of  the  ground  area. 

Seabirds:  Six  species  of  seabirds  are  known  to  breed:  red- 
footed  booby  ( 184  pairs),  great  frigatebird  (287  pairs),  brown 
noddy  (161  pairs),  black  noddy  (176  pairs),  and  white  tern 


(195  pairs).  No  sooty  terns  nested  on  this  islet  in  1988,  but 
Clapp  &  Sibley  ( 1 97 1  a)  estimated  2,500  pairs  in  1 965,  and  the 
Falconers  reported  large  colonies  on  Mannikiba,  Blackfin  and 
Matawa  in  July-August  1990. 

Comments:  Coconut  crabs  live  in  the  Cocos  grove. 
Azure-tailed  and  snake-eyed  skinks  (Cryptoblepharus 
poecilopleurus),  as  well  as  a  gecko,  were  noted  in  1990  (DHE, 
G.  Wragg,  personal  observation). 

25.  BLACKFIN  ISLET  (2.62  ha)  (Figs.  29,54;  Pis.  3 1 ,73 ) 

We  named  this  motu,  second  in  the  Central  Leeward  chain, 
for  two  exhilarating  shark  attacks  (near  misses)  within  its 
northern  surge  channel. 

Physiography:  Blackfin,  shaped  like  conjoined  ovals,  is 
140  m  long  and  190  m  across.  Coral  rubble  covers  30%  of  its 
surface;  all  beaches  and  upper  reef  flats  are  of  variable  widths, 
due  in  part  to  the  fact  that  it  has.  in  the  recent  geological  past, 
incorporated  a  smaller,  circular  motu  into  its  northern  confines. 

Vegetation:  Blackfin  Islet  has  nine  species  of  plants  (three 
trees,  one  shrub,  five  herbs),  33%  of  Caroline's  flora.  The  only 
introduction,  Cocos,  is  rare.  Four  plant  communities  were 
identified.  Herb  mats  are  well  represented,  especially  around 
the  newly  incorporated  islet.  The  Tournefortia  scrub,  21  m 
v/ide  in  the  east,  is  short  (to  2  m),  but  approaches  the  stature  of 
a  forest  (to  6  m)  in  the  west.  The  central  forests  of  Cordia  and 
Pisonia  (0.41  ha)  are  9  m  high. 

Birds:  Three  species  of  seabirds  bred  in  1988:  great 
frigatebird  (4  pairs),  brown  noddy  (37  pairs),  and  white  tern 
( 1 1  pairs).  In  May  1990,  one  red-footed  booby  sat  tight  on  a 
nest,  while  two  months  later  large  numbers  of  sooty  terns  began 
laying. 

26.  MOTU  MATAWA  "White  Tern  Islet"  (1.71  ha) 
(Figs.  29.54;  PI.  55:  Subchapter  1.2,  PI.  3) 

On  arriving  at  this  islet,  the  authors  were  swarmed  by 
1 5  white  terns,  all  hovering  within  arm's  reach  and  exhibiting 
the  ethereal  grace  that  inspired  their  former  common  name, 
fairy  tern.  I-Kiribati  (Gilbertese)  call  them  matawa. 

Physiography:  Of  oval  shape,  Motu  Matawa  is  third  from 
the  north  in  the  Central  Leeward  chain.  It  is  105  m  long  and 
190  m  wide.  The  entire  motu,  like  all  of  Caroline's  small  to 
medium  islets,  is  built  of  coral  rubble  of  varying  grades,  whose 
unvegetated  portion  comprises  one-fourth  or  more  of  the  land 
area.  Its  lagoon  beach  is  2.5  m  wide,  while  the  seaward  beach 
(sparsely  vegetated)  is  6  m  wide. 

Vegetation:  Matawa  has  10  species  of  plants  (4  trees, 
2  shrubs,  4  herbs),  37%  of  Caroline's  flora.  There  are  no 
introductions.  The  usual  plant  communities  were  present, 
dominated  by  Tournefortia  (to  7  m),  which  covers  half  the  islet. 
Vegetation  is  less  lush  and  more  open  as  one  progresses  south 
on  the  leeward  side.  Coral  rubble,  flanking  the  beaches  and 
extending  further  inland,  also  becomes  more  evident.  The  east- 
central  Pisonia-Cordia  forest  (to  8  m)  rises  barely  higher  than 
its  surrounding  Tournefortia. 


45 


Birds:  Four  species  of  seabirds  bred:  red-footed  booby 
(5  pairs),  great  frigatebird  ( I  pair),  brown  noddy  (3  pairs),  and 
white  tern  ( 1 3  pairs).  Most  conspicuous  were  white  terns,  with 
9  pairs  breeding  on  the  30-m-wide  transect  swath.  One  dark 
morph  reef  heron  fished  in  the  shallows.  In  summer  1990, 
sooty  terns  bred. 

27.  EMERALD  ISLE  (8.34  ha)  (Figs.  29,54;  Pis.  25,74-76) 

Fifth  down  the  chain,  we  named  Emerald  for  the  richly 
colored,  translucent  lagoon  waters  that  fringe  its  shorelines. 

Physiography:  Of  thickened  crescentic  shape,  Emerald  is 
330  m  long  and  240  m  wide.  Its  lagoonside  reefs,  patch  reefs, 
and  coral  knolls  are  irregularly  patterned  with  sandy  channels. 
It  is  here  that  the  verdure  of  the  lagoon  is  most  intense. 

Vegetation:  Emerald  Isle  has  12  species  of  plants  (5  trees, 
1  shrub,  6  herbs),  44%  ofCaroline's  flora.  The  only  introduction 
is  Cocos.  Four  plant  communities,  with  a  fairly  high  species 
diversity,  are  present:  the  herb  mats,  covering  one-fourth  of  its 
land  area,  are  composed  almost  exclusively  of  Heliotropium 
( 35%  cover)  with  scattered  low  Tournefortia (30%  cover).  The 
Tournefortia  scrub  and  forest  attains  a  maximum  height  of  8  m 
and.  for  a  little  variety,  is  mixed  about  equally  with  Pandanus 
over  most  of  its  width  ( 144  m)  on  the  seaward  side. 

The  interior  forest  (to  1 1  m  tall)  is  also  mixed,  with 
Pandanus,  Tournefortia,  Pisonia,  and  a  little  Cordia  (PI.  75). 
This  condition  is  similar  to  the  mixed  forest  on  Nake,  but 
because  Cocos  is  absent,  it  appears  more  natural.  The  existence 
of  this  3.20  ha  mixed  forest,  as  well  as  a  similar  one  on  Shark, 
prompted  us  to  suggest  that  Pandanus  may  be  both  native  and 
Polynesian-introduced.  Cocos  is  present  as  two  small  groves, 
complete  with  coconut  crab  sign  (mounds  of  shredded  fibers, 
PL  57),  beside  the  east  and  midwest  shores. 

We  have  been  unable  to  trace  the  history  of  Emerald's 
forests:  the  presence  of  Cocos  on  the  west  side  and  fragmented 
Pisonia  suggest  past  disturbance. 

Birds:  Six  species  of  breeding  seabirds  were  present:  red- 
tailed  Tropicbird  (1  pair),  red-footed  booby  (3  pairs),  great 
frigatebird  (230  pairs),  brown  noddy  (7  pairs),  black  noddy 
( 150  pairs),  and  white  tern  (83  pairs). 

Although  we  did  not  locate  any  red-tailed  tropicbird  nests, 
two  adults  circled  steadily  overhead.  Two  reef  herons  (one 
dark  morph,  one  light )  also  foraged  in  the  inshore  reef  shallows. 

28.  SHARK  ISLET  (7.98  ha)  (Figs.  29,55;  Pis.  29,77) 

We  named  this  islet  to  commemorate  a  particularly 
pugnacious  shark  who  was  so  anxious  to  procure  a  human  foot 
that  it  charged  shoreward  and  leaped  up  onto  the  beach. 

Physiography:  Stoutly  crescentic.  Shark  Islet  is  280  m 
long  and  310  m  wide  in  the  center.  The  sandy  lagoon  beach  and 
rubbly  seaward  beach  are  each  3  m  wide.  Beyond  high  water 
the  seaward  reel  Hats  extend  for  280  m.  Like  Emerald.  Shark's 
reefs  and  surrounding  lagoon  waters  reflect  particularly  stunning 
colors,  perfect  complements  to  the  sparkling  pink  coral  sand  of 
Caroline's  prime  beach. 


Vegetation:  There  are  12  species  of  plants  (5  trees, 
1  shrub,  6  herbs),  44%  of  the  atoll's  flora.  Shark  has  one 
introduction,  Cocos,  forming  3  clumps  along  the  lagoon  beach 
( 1  %  of  the  islet's  area).  Shark's  rings  of  vegetation  approximate 
the  islet's  outline.  Herb  mats  dot  the  fine  sand  lagoonward. 
while  to  seaward  they  emerge  from  coarse  rubble.  The 
Tournefortia  (to  7  m  tall)  eventually  gives  way  to  a  12-m-high 
Pisonia  forest  studded  with  Cordia  and  Pandanus.  Centrally 
this  mixed  forest  is  unnaturally  open,  suggesting  possible  past 
disturbance. 

Birds:  Four  species  of  seabirds  bred  in  1988:  great 
frigatebird  (118  pairs),  brown  noddy  (37  pairs),  black  noddy 
(125  pairs),  and  white  tern  (44  pairs),  red-footed  boobies  were 
nesting  in  1990.  The  notable  colonies  of  great  frigatebirds  and 
black  noddies  are  due  in  part  to  the  extensive  Pisonia  forest, 
covering  half  of  the  islet. 

29.  SCARLET  CRAB  ISLET  (0.46  ha)  (Figs.  28,55) 

This  motu  was  named  by  the  authors  in  honor  of  Coenobita 
perlatus,  the  scarlet,  fist-sized  hermit  crab  that  is  abundant  both 
here  and  on  the  entire  atoll. 

Physiography:  Scarlet  Crab,  sixth  in  the  chain  and  only 
40  m  long  by  1 25  m  wide,  is  a  young  motu  shaped  like  a  closed 
pair  of  lips.  It  skirts  the  southern  shore  of  Shark,  separated  from 
it  by  a  channel  1 6  m  wide.  Because  its  eastern  end  points  into 
the  lagoon,  there  is  no  true  lagoon  beach.  Together  with  the 
next  three  islets.  Scarlet  Crab's  seaward  reef  flats  (480  m)  are 
the  most  extensive  on  Caroline's  lee  side. 

Vegetation:  Vegetative  cover  is  slight:  less  than  1% 
area  coverage  of  Heliotropium  and  Laportea,  interspersed 
with  10  small  Tournefortia  (to  1.5  m).  Its  species  count  is  6 
(1  shrub,  5  herbs),  22%  of  Caroline's  flora.  There  are  no 
introductions. 

Birds:  Although  during  storms  this  motu  is  undoubted!) 
awash,  two  species  of  seabirds  were  breeding  in  1988:  brown 
noddy  (one  pair,  on  ground)  and  white  tern  (two  pairs,  in  low 
scrub). 

30.  MOTU  NAUTONGA  "Sea  Cucumber  Islet-  (0.34  ha) 
(Figs.  28.55) 

We  named  this  motu  for  the  Gilbertese  word  for  the  black 
sea  cucumbers  or  "beche-de-mer"  (Ludwigothuria  sp. )  that  are 
densely  strewn  over  all  ofCaroline's  reef  shallows  (PI.  10). 

Physiography:  Semicircular  in  shape.  Nautonga  is  seventh 
in  the  Central  Leeward  chain,  measuring  70  m  long  and  80  m 
wide.  Situated  close  to  the  lagoon,  it  is  one  of  three  small  islets 
that  barely  protrude  above  the  reef  flats.  Nautonga' s  perimeter 
beaches  are  all  narrow  (2m),  and  its  seaward  reef  flats  are  wide 
(495  mi. 

Vegetation:  There  are  nine  indigenous  species  (three 
trees,  one  shrub,  five  herbs).  33%  of  the  atoll's  flora.  Though 
small.  Nautonga's  vegetation  is  concentrically  zoned, 
comprising  herb  mats  (10-14  m  wide),  and  a  central  forest  of 
Tournefortia  and  Pisonia  (84  m  wide)  up  to  10  m  high. 


46 


Birds:  Five  species  of  seabirds  bred  in  1988:  red-footed 
booby  ( 1 1  pairs),  great  frigatebird  (2  pairs),  brown  noddy 
(7  pairs),  black  noddy  (32  pairs),  and  white  tern  (10  pairs). 
Lesser  frigatebirds  appeared  to  be  preparing  to  nest  in  May 
1 990.  One  pair  of  blue-gray  noddies,  flying  toward  Azure  Isle, 
was  seen  by  the  1990  expedition  in  May. 

31.  AZURE  ISLE  (0.20  ha)  (Figs.  28,55;  PI.  53) 

We  named  this  small,  wedge-shaped  motu  for  the  striking 
blue-green  of  its  nearby  lagoon. 

Physiography:  Eighth  from  the  north,  this  small,  elongated 
triangle  of  land  is  30  m  long  and  66  m  wide.  Its  seaward  reef 
flats  are  wide  (512  m).  Its  surge  channels  are  narrow  and 
shallow. 

Vegetation:  Azure  has  only  seven  species  (one  tree,  one 
shrub,  five  herbs),  26%  of  Caroline's  flora.  The  Pisonia  tree  is 
6  m  tall.  A  young  motu.  Azure  is  a  superb  example  of  an  early 
stage  of  biological  succession.  Its  plant  cover  consists  of  a 
single  mound  of  Toumefortia  scrub  crowned  by  a  single 
Pisonia  tree,  growing  from  rubble  only  one  meter  above  sea 
level.  Only  45%  of  its  surface  is  vegetated;  the  rest,  primarily 
on  the  ocean  side,  is  coarse  rubble.  Azure  Isle  presents  what 
may  be  the  minimum  width  of  vegetation  (38  m)  in  which 
Pisonia  can  develop  on  Caroline. 

Birds:  This  motu  illustrates  the  speed  at  which  seabirds 
will  utilize  newly  available  habitats.  Within  its  dozen  or  so 
Toumefortia  shrubs  (to  4  m  tall),  three  species  of  seabirds  nest: 
red-footed  booby  ( 7  pairs ),  great  frigatebird  ( 2  pairs ),  and  white 
tern  (2  pairs).  A  pair  of  blue-gray  noddies  were  seen  in  May 
1990. 

32.  REEF-FLAT  ISLET  (0.09  ha)  (Figs.  27,55) 

We  named  this  young  motu  for  its  primary  characteristic — 
its  reef  flats.  Ninth  in  the  Central  Leeward  chain,  this  curved 
strip  of  coarse  rubble  lies  parallel  to  the  surge  channels  that 
surround  it.  It  measures  about  20  m  long  and  60  m  wide.  Only 
three  species  of  plants  are  present  (one  shrub,  two  herbs),  1 1% 
of  Caroline's  flora.  They  cover  less  than  one-fourth  of  its  area 
and  are  distributed  so  sparsely  that  not  one  bird  was  present. 

33.  BIRD  ISLET  (4.05  ha)  (Figs.  29,55) 

This  is  one  of  the  motus  named  on  Arundel '  s  chart  ( Fig.  4), 
probably  reflecting  the  presence  of  black  noddies  and/or  sooty 
terns. 

Physiography:  Bird  is  ovoid,  measuring  230  m  long  by 
200  m  wide.  It  sits  close  to  the  inner  edge  of  the  lagoon  reef, 
whereas  400  m  of  seaward  reef  flats  stretch  westward. 

Vegetation:  There  are  12  species  of  plants  (4  trees, 
2  shrubs,  6  herbs),  44%  of  Caroline's  flora.  A  small  Cocos 
grove  is  the  only  introduction.  It  is  well  wooded,  with  very 
narrow  herb  mats  (6%  of  total  area).  Toumefortia  (to  8  m)  and 
Pisonia  (to  14  m)  each  cover  42%  of  its  surface;  the  rest  is 
rubble.  The  Pisonia  forest  is  of  good  quality  (90-95%  canopy 
cover),  having  scattered  Mo  rinda.  Boerhavia.  andAchyranthes 


as  an  understory.  One  large  clump  of  Suriana  (14  x  14  m, 
2.5  m  high)  occurred  in  the  islet  center  (A.  Garnett,  personal 
observation).  Bird  Islet  shows  very  few  signs  of  past  disturbance, 
having  prime  plant  communities,  rich  in  breeding  seabirds. 

Birds:  Five  species  of  seabirds  nested  in  1988:  red-footed 
booby  (29  pairs),  great  frigatebird  (6  pairs),  brown  noddy 
(42  pairs),  black  noddy  (329  pairs),  and  white  tern  (48  pairs). 
In  June  1990,  many  thousands  of  sooty  terns  laid  on  Bird  and 
adjacent  Fishball. 

34.   FISHBALL  ISLET  (0.57  ha)  (Figs.  28,55,56) 

Eleventh  and  southernmost  in  the  Central  Leeward  chain, 
we  named  Fishball  after  discovering  a  large  glass  fishing  float 
with  a  broken  bottom,  decorously  placed  in  the  islet's  center 
within  a  square  of  coral  slabs. 

Physiography:  Paramecium-shaped,  Fishball  lies  close  to 
the  lagoon  and  is  separated  from  Bird  by  a  shallow,  rubble- 
strewn  channel  100  m  wide.  The  motu  is  45  m  long  by  144  m 
wide,  with  seaward  reef  flats  595  m  in  extent.  South  of  the  islet, 
the  reef  flats — wadable  at  very  low  tide — stretch  1 .4  km  to  the 
Southern  Leeward  Islets. 

Vegetation:  The  number  of  plant  species  is  eight  (one 
seedling  "tree,"  one  shrub,  six  herbs),  30%  of  Caroline's  flora. 
Figure  56  depicts  an  east-west  cross-section  of  Fishball,  showing 
a  vertical  profile  and  the  relative  abundance  and  distribution  of 
each  species.  Fishball  exemplifies  an  emerging  motu.  All 
plants  are  low  and  halophytic;  most  are  herbs.  The  motu  is  half- 
covered  with  a  sparse  herb  mat  of  Heliotropium  (10%  cover), 
with  scattered Laportea.  Lepturus ,  and  Portulaca  (less  than  1% 
cover  each).  Small  Toumefortia  shrubs  (to  2  m  tall)  are 
scattered  in  the  central  sector,  while  a  tiny  drift  seedling  of 
Morinda,  7  cm  high,  struggled  to  gain  a  foothold  in  the 
exposed,  salty  rubble. 

This  motu  is  a  fine  example  of  the  initial  stages  of  islet 
formation  and  colonization.  It  demonstrates  that  sea-dispersed, 
halophytic  herbs  first  germinate  on  the  coarse  rubble,  later 
becoming  shaded  out  by  Toumefortia,  enabling  a  greater  plant 
species  diversity  to  establish.  It  is  very  unlikely  that  a  water 
lens  is  present. 

Birds:  Two  species  of  seabirds  bred  in  1988:  red-tailed 
tropicbird  (three  pairs)  and  brown  noddy  (five  pairs).  In  May 
1990,  many  thousands  of  sooty  terns  covered  the  ground  and 
swirled  in  the  air,  day  and  night.  On  23  May,  no  eggs  were 
found,  but  laying  occurred  on  Fishball  and  adjacent  Bird  Islet 
in  June  (A.  Falconer,  personal  communication). 

Southern  Leeward  Islets  (Pis.  14,  78) 

This  chain  of  five  small  motus  lies  along  the  southwestern 
edge  of  the  lagoon.  All  are  built  upon  piles  of  rubble  about 
3  m  high,  oriented  in  an  east-west  direction,  and  are  separated 
by  shallow,  narrow  channels.  They  range  in  size  from  1 .5 1  to 
3.67  ha,  and  their  topography,  vegetation,  and  breeding  seabirds 
are  similar.  Although  situated  on  the  leeward  side  of  the  atoll, 
the  Southern  Leeward  Islets  exhibit  some  windward 
characteristics:  they  lie  opposite  and  slightly  north  of  a  wide 
break  in  the  windward  reef,  which  allows  trade  winds  to  sweep. 


47 


uninterrupted,  across  the  lagoon.  This  promotes  their  60-80% 
cover  of  scrub  or  forest.  Ana-Ana,  the  southernmost,  was 
periodically  occupied  from  1987-1991  by  the  Falconer  family. 

Of  particular  botanical  interest  are  the  interior  forests, 
composed  of  Pisonia  mixed  with  more  Cordia  than  elsewhere 
on  the  atoll.  Pure  Cordia  groves  (mostly  too  small  to  map 
accurately)  typically  occupy  the  forest  periphery. 

Their  history  (apart  from  the  last  3  years)  is  unknown;  all 
appear  to  harbor  virgin  plant  communities  with  occasional 
drift-derived  Cocos  or  Pandanus. 

35.  MOTU  RAURAU  "Blue-?ra\  Nodd\  Islet"  (3.48  ha) 
(Figs.  29,57;  Pis.  14,78,79) 

Northernmost  of  the  Southern  Leeward  Islets,  we  named 
this  motu  for  the  blue-gray  noddies  {raurau  in  Gilbertese) 
observed  there.  A  highly  territorial  blue-gray  noddy  was  acting 
as  though  a  nest  was  nearby. 

Physiography:  Raurau  is  ovoid,  with  a  small  lagoonside 
bay.  and  maximum  dimensions  of  1 80  m  long  and  23 1  m  wide. 
It  has  the  most  expansive  rubble  of  all  the  Southern  Leeward 
Islets.  This  coarse  coral  clinker  extends,  apronlike,  around  the 
islet,  widest  (40  m)  closest  to  the  lagoon  and  narrowest  (10  m) 
to  seaward.  The  seaward  reef  flats  extend  446  m  to  the  ocean. 

Vegetation:  The  number  of  plant  species  is  10(5  trees. 
1  shrub.  4  herbs),  37%  of  the  atoll's  flora.  Raurau's  two  plant 
communities  are  simple:  a  very  scant  herb  mat  is  sprinkled 
with  Tournefortia,  which  rises  to  6-m-high  scrub  all  around  the 
islet.  Laportea  forms  a  narrow  band  at  the  interface  between 
coral  rubble  and  scrub.  Centrally  a  Pisonia  forest  (to  13  m). 
dotted  with  Cordia  on  the  periphery,  harbors  much  Morinda  in 
the  understory.  including  the  tallest  Morinda  ( 1 3  m)  seen  on  the 
atoll.  A  handful  of  drift-derived  Cocos  and  Pandanus.  the  only 
introductions,  dot  the  scrub. 

Birds:  No  seabirds  were  found  on  transect,  but  a  perimeter 
walk  in  1 988  revealed  that  tour  species  bred  on  the  west  side  in 
the  Tournefortia  scrub:  red-footed  booby  (10  pairs),  great 
frigatebird  (31  pairs),  brown  noddy  (1  pair),  and  white  tern 
( 2  pairs).  This  islet,  for  its  size,  is  particularly  rich  in  frigatebirds. 

Comments:  Polynesian  rats  are  present. 

36.  MOTU  EITEI  "Frigatebird Islet "(1.41  ha)  (Figs.  29.57; 
Pis.  14.78) 

Second  in  line  from  the  north,  we  named  this  motu  for  its 
nesting  great  frigatebirds,  eitei  in  Gilbertese. 

Physiography:  Motu  Eitei  is  fat-elliptical.  105  m  long  and 
2X0  m  wide.  Lying  perpendicular  to  the  reef  axis,  it  touches  the 
lagoon  edge  on  its  inner  side.  To  seaward,  the  reel'  Hats  are 
644  m  wide. 

Vegetation:  There  are  eight  species  of  plants  (three  trees, 
one  shrub,  lour  herbs),  $09i  of  the  atoll's  flora,  with  no 
introductions.  Eitei  is  carpeted  with  three  plant  communities 
in  the  usual  concentric  arrangement.  However,  there  is  a  slight 
difference  in  the  species  composition  of  the  herb  mats:  on 
transect,  the  southern  mat  (2  m  wide)  consisted  solely  of 
Portulaca,  while  the  north  side  contained  a  3-m  swath  of 
Heliotropium,  Laportea.  and  scattered  Suriana.  Inside  the  mat 


is  a  ring  of  Tournefortia  scrub  (to  5  m)  and  a  central  Pisonia- 
Cordia  forest  (to  11m).  Laportea  is  particularly  abundant, 
while  Portulaca,  normally  confined  to  the  edges,  abounds  in 
small  openings  within  the  interior  woodlands. 

Birds:  Four  species  of  seabirds  bred  on  Motu  Eitei  in  1988: 
red-footed  booby  ( 1 7  pairs),  great  frigatebird  ( 1 4  pairs ).  brown 
noddy  (6  pairs),  and  white  tern  ( 18  pairs).  The  first  blue-gray 
noddy  nest  for  Caroline  was  found  in  summer.  1990 
(Subchapter  1.2.  this  volume). 

37.  PISONIA  ISLET  (2.45  ha)  (Figs.  29.57:  Pis.  14.78) 

We  named  this  motu  for  its  fine  Pisonia  forest. 

Physiography:  Pisonia,  third  in  the  chain  from  the  north, 
is  almost  circular  and  lies  closely  appressed  to  its  neighbor 
islets.  Its  maximum  dimensions  are  140  m  long  and  220  m 
wide.  Like  Raurau.  it  possesses  a  wide  "apron"  of  coral  rubble 
and  sparse  herbs  on  the  lagoon  side.  Its  seaward  reef  flats  are 
300  m  wide. 

Vegetation:  The  number  of  plant  species  is  15  (5  trees. 
2  shrubs,  8  herbs),  56%  of  the  atoll's  flora.  The  only  introduction 
is  Cocos  { few,  scattered,  north  and  south  shores).  Well  wooded. 
Pisonia  harbors  the  customary  three  plant  communities:  the 
herb  mat  is  almost  pure  Heliotropium,  dotted  with  Suriana. 
One  specimen  of  Lepidium  bidentatum  w  as  found  in  1 990.  The 
Tournefortia  scrub  and  forest,  covering  half  of  the  motu's 
length  and  width,  grows  to  9  m.  while  the  Pisonia— Cordia 
forest,  covering  0.86  ha  ( 35%  of  the  islet's  area),  reached  1 0  m. 

Birds:  Despite  the  beautiful  Pisonia  forest,  no  black  or 
brown  noddies  nested.  Only  three  species  of  seabirds  bred  in 
1988:  red-footed  booby  (26  pairs),  great  frigatebird!  14  pairs). 
and  white  tern  ( 10  pairs).  Best  represented  were  red-footed 
boobies:  a  perimeter  count  yielded  18  tended  nests,  all  in 
Tournefortia  scrub.  A  long-tailed  cuckoo  was  heard  in  the 
interior. 

Comments:  Rats  were  common:  six  were  noted  on  a  mid- 
morning  transect  survey. 

38.  MOTU  KIMOA  "Rat  Islet"  (1.80  ha)  (Figs.  29.57: 
Pis.  14.78,80) 

Fourth  from  the  north,  we  named  this  motu  for  its  single 
mammalian  inhabitant,  the  Polynesian  rat,  kimoa  in  Gilbertese. 

Physiography:  Kimoa,  smallest  of  the  Southern  Leeward 
Islets  and  shaped  like  a  flared  teardrop,  is  squeezed  between  its 
neighbor  motus.  Its  maximum  dimensions  are  92  m  long  and 
218  m  wide,  almost  four  times  the  size  mapped  by  Arundel 
(Fig.  4).  The  southeast  rubble  and  herb  mats  are  wide.  The 
distance  to  the  outer  reef  edge  is  307  m.  Of  special  note  is  the 
emergent  Tridacna—Acropora  reef,  which  stretches  completely 
across  the  lagoon  to  Tridacna  Islet.  This  reef  is  1 5-20  m  wide 
(Fig.  48;  Pis.  26. 63  land  1.023  m  long,  which,  together  with  an 
equal  length  in  blind  diverticulae.  totals  over  2  km.  The 
Tridacna  clams  aggregate  in  densities  up  to  80/  in'  ( Sirenko  & 
Koltun,  Subchapter  1.4). 

Vegetation:  Kimoa  has  II  species  of  plants  (3  trees, 
2  shrubs.  6  herbs).  419?  of  Caroline's  flora  There  are  no 
introductions.     Though  small  and  narrow.  Kimoa  is  well 


48 


vegetated.  Its  herb  mats  are  composed  of  Heliotropium  on  the 
south  side  and  Portulaca  (plus  Suriana)  on  the  north.  The 
interior  Tournefortia-Pisonia-Cordia  forests  (to  1 1  m)  cover 
nearly  one-half  of  the  islet's  area. 

Birds:  Four  species  of  seabirds  bred  in  1988:  red-footed 
booby  (21  pairs),  great  frigatebird  (3  pairs),  black  noddy 
(2  pairs),  and  white  tern  (7  pairs).  Red-footed  booby  nests  were 
located  along  the  perimeter. 

39.  MOTU  ANA- ANA  "Anne 's  Islet"  ( 2. 1 6  ha)  (Figs.  29,57; 
Pis.  5a.  14,54,78,81) 

This  motu  includes  a  small  settlement  with  three  thatched 
huts  (cooking,  eating,  sleeping),  a  water  tank,  chicken  coop, 
and  garden.  It  was  occupied  from  1 989- 1 99 1  by  Anne  and  Ron 
Falconer,  2  small  children,  chickens,  Muscovy  ducks,  and  a 
dog.  When  we  discovered  a  wooden  sign  marked  "Ana-Ana" 
and  adorned  with  a  shell  lei,  we  knew  the  islet  had  been  named. 

It  is  interesting  to  compare  Pis.  5a  and  8 1 ,  identical  views 
of  Ana-Ana  105  years  apart.  The  profiles  are  indistinguishable, 
showing  how  little  this  motu  has  changed  over  the  years. 

Physiography:  Ana-Ana  is  the  southernmost  motu  in  the 
Southern  Leeward  Islets,  120  m  long  by  222  m  wide  at  its 
widest  point.  Approximately  3  m  high,  it  is  roughly  oval,  with 
a  hooked  point  and  curved  bay  facing  the  lagoon.  This  point  is 
actively  growing  as  more  and  more  rubble  is  deposited  by  the 
large  flow  of  water  passing  through  the  channel  (430  m  wide) 
that  separates  Ana- Ana  and  South  Island.  This  channel  contains 
abundant  giant  clams  that  amass  into  an  extensive  Acropora- 
Tridacna  reef  stretching  approximately  900  m  across  the 
lagoon  to  Tridacna  Islet.  The  outer  reef  flats  measured 
281  m. 

Vegetation:  Ana- Ana  has  15  species  of  plants  (5  trees, 
2  shrubs,  8  herbs),  56%  of  Caroline's  flora.  Introductions 
include  Cocos,  vegetables,  a  few  ornamentals  and,  as  yet.  no 
weeds.  Ana-Ana's  vegetation  is  typical  of  the  other  Southern 
Leeward  Islets,  except  for  the  settlement.  Narrow  trails  from 
the  southern  channel  lead  to  a  neat  clearing,  approximately 
40  m  x  70  m,  the  only  inhabited  portion  of  the  atoll.  We  have 
advised  the  Falconers  against  introducing  exotic  plants  with 
spreading  seeds  and  have  requested  them  to  destroy  all 
introductions  when  vacating  the  island  permanently. 

Ana-Ana  has  sparse  strand  vegetation:  Suriana, 
Heliotropium,  Portulaca,  Laportea,  and  Lepturus.  The 
Toumefortia  scrub  includes  Cocos,  Cordia,  and  Pandanus.  A 
quality  Pisonia  forest,  1 5  m  high,  covers  43%  of  the  islet's  area. 

Birds:  No  breeding  seabirds  were  found  on  any  of  the  three 
visits  to  Caroline.  However,  the  Falconers  have  found  a  few 
white  terns  and  one  great  frigatebird  nesting  in  the  perimeter 
scrub,  as  well  as  groups  of  brown  noddies  sitting  on  the  beach. 
Long-tailed  cuckoos  were  seen  around  the  huts  in  March, 
April,  and  May  1990. 

Comments:  Rats  are  abundant.  Although  the  house  site 
was  clean  and  tidy,  1 2  rats  were  seen  in  a  pile  of  coconut  debris, 
and  others  scurried  amongst  the  forest  litter.    The  Falconers 


have  trapped  over  1 ,300  rats  in  less  than  2  years.  Several  pale 
geckos  with  a  few  spots  and  largish  heads  were  seen  in  and 
around  the  thatched  huts  (probably  mourning  geckos). 

Conclusion 

Lushly  wooded  Caroline  Atoll,  with  the  majority  of  its 
39  islets  (399  ha  of  land)  either  in  near-pristine  condition  or 
having  recovered  remarkably  from  past  disturbance,  is  one  of 
the  least  spoiled  atolls  in  the  Pacific.  Uninhabited  except  for 
one  family,  it  harbors  plant  ecosystems  and  breeding  seabirds 
(Subchapter  1.2,  this  volume)  of  national  and  international 
importance.  Its  marine  and  terrestrial  ecosystems  are  prime 
outdoor  ecological  laboratories  for  research  on  geological 
processes  including  groundwater,  fish  poisoning,  and  numerous 
facets  of  ecology  (especially  plant  succession).  Caroline 
boasts  outstanding  coral  reefs  thickly  studded  with  giant  clams, 
substantial  numbers  of  coconut  crabs,  breeding  sites  for  green 
turtles,  wintering  grounds  for  shorebirds  including  the  rare 
bristle-thighed  curlew,  ancient  Tuamotuan  marae,  and  a 
crystalline  lagoon.  The  variety,  abundance,  and  quality  of  its 
flora  and  fauna  qualify  it  for  status  as  an  officially  recognized 
international  preserve  (Subchapter  1 .2.  Conservation  section). 

An  expedition  of  this  magnitude  entailed  the  help  of  many 
people,  and  it  gives  us  great  pleasure  to  thank  them.  We  are  indebted 
to  Hal  O'Connor  and  Randy  Perry.  Patuxent  Wildlife  Research 
Center,  for  making  possible  our  participation.  Steve  Kohl,  FWS 
Office  of  Internationa]  Affairs,  and  Terry  Whitledge  aided  immensely 
by  handling  innumerable  details  with  their  Soviet  colleagues.  Members 
of  the  Fish  &  Wildlife  Service  Mauna  Loa  Field  Station,  especially 
Jim  Jacobi.  Julia  Williams.  Jack  Jeffrey,  and  Martha  Moore,  provided 
welcome  logistical  support  in  Hilo.  and  Paul  Sykes  willingly  shouldered 
additional  responsibility  that  freed  CBK  to  join  the  expedition. 

On  the  Soviet  side,  we  thank  Professor  Alia  V.  Tsyban,  chief 
scientist  of  the  expedition,  for  extensive  help  and  friendship  during  the 
voyage.  Captain  Oleg  A.  Rostovtsev.  Yevgeniy  N.  Nelepov.  Yuri  L. 
Volodkovich,  and  the  ship's  crew  for  handling  many  ship-board 
details  and  transporting  us  to  and  from  Christmas  Island  and  Caroline. 
Contacts  with  our  Soviet  colleagues  would  have  been  far  less 
memorable  without  the  translation  skills  of  Svetlana  V.  Petrovskaya 
and.  especially,  Valeriya  M.  Vronskaya. 

We  thank  Greg  Smith  and  Chuck  Stafford  for  transporting  us 
within  Caroline's  lagoon  in  the  inflatable  Zodiac  "Tigris."  Katino 
Teeb'aki  shared  in  the  hard  work  on  transects,  and  his  skills  at 
climbing  palms  and  opening  coconuts  often  energized  us  during  the 
wilting  midday  heat.  Abureti  Takaio.  former  Minister  for  the  Line  and 
Phoenix  Groups,  permitted  us  to  work  on  Caroline  and.  with  the 
residents  of  Christmas  Island,  arranged  a  memorable  evening  of 
dancing  and  food,  despite  the  fact  that  their  last  supply  ship  was 
10  months  previous:  for  this  and  their  many  kindnesses  we  are  most 
grateful. 

Financial  assistance  for  the  1988  expedition  and  for  writing  the 
manuscript  was  provided  by  the  US  Fish  &  Wildlife  Service.  Patuxent 
Wildlife  Research  Center,  and  the  Natural  Environment  &  Climate 
Monitoring  Laboratory.  Goskomgidromet  USSR. 

Grateful  thanks  are  extended  to  Derral  Herbst  for  identifying  and 
preparing  plant  specimens  (deposited  in  the  B.  P.  Bishop  Museum. 
Honolulu.  Hawaii )  and  George  Zug  for  identifying  lizards  (deposited 


49 


in  the  US  National  Museum.  Washington.  DC).    The  Royal  New 

Zealand  Air  Force  supplied  the  aerial  photos.    Roger  Clapp,  Ray 

rg,  Gene  Hclfman,  Harry  Maude.  Ernst  Reese,  and  David 

Stoddart  shared  unpublished  manuscripts  and  other  information.  We 

are  most  grateful  to  Lynda  Garrett  and  Wanda  Manning  of  the 
Patuxent  Wildlife  Research  Center  I  ibrary .  Laurel,  Maryland,  for 
digging  out  obscure  historical  references.  Harry  Maude  of  the 
Australian  National  University  introduced  us  to  plantation  records 
and  similar  "gray  literature."  which  proved  indispensable  in 
understanding  Caroline's  past  and  present  ecology.  The  libraries  and 
herbarium  at  the  University  of  Georgia  were  also  useful.  We 
especialK  thank  Bonnie  Fancher  for  her  efficiency,  enthusiasm,  and 
hard  work,  often  late  at  night  and  on  w  eekends.  on  the  computer  and 
in  other  clerical  matters.  The  manuscript  has  benefitted  from  reviews 
by  Ron  and  Anne  Falconer.  Ray  Fosberg.  Pat  Roscigno,  Betty  Ann 
Schreiber,  Fred  Sibley.  Terry  Whitledge.  and  Stephen  Zeeman. 

AKK.  as  coleader  of  the  ICBP  1 990  expedition,  expresses  much 
gratitude  to  Christoff  Imboden  (International  Council  for  Bird 
Preservation)  and  coleader/expedition  initiator  Martin  Garnett,  for 
sharing  finances.  Thanks  also  to  Martin  and  Annie  Garnett.  John 
Phillips,  and  Mark  Linsley  for  help  with  field  work,  and  to  Alve 
Henricson  for  his  sailing  skills.  The  expedition  would  not  have  been 
successful   without   the  dedication  of  Captain  Graham   Wragg. 


skipper/owner  of  TeManu,  w  ho  transported  us  7.400  km  in  the  central 
Pacific  (including  two  \ isils  to  Caroline),  helped  with  field  work, 
and  whose  competence  and  consideration  in  many  areas  eased  the 
varied  hardships  associated  with  3  months  at  sea  in  a  10.5-m 
ketch.  Thanks  also  to  Scott  Miller  for  providing  insect  \ials  and  for 
preparing  and  depositing  insect  specimens  in  the  Bishop  Museum. 
Hawaii. 

On  remote  Caroline,  the  Falconers  were  exceptionally  hospitable 
hosts,  developing  a  special  interest  in  its  wildlife  and  helping  us  with 
field  work  during  and  after  the  expedition.  Special  thanks  go  to 
7-year-old  Alexandre,  who  discovered  the  first  blue-gray  noddy  nest 
for  the  island  and  3  new  plant  records. 

French  Polynesian  residents  who  assisted  in  various  ways 
include  Jacques  Florence.  Les  and  Gloria  Whiteley.  Rick  Steger. 
Michael  Poole.  Jean  Roudeix.  and  friends  who  supplied  us  with 
fruit  and  \  egetables  for  the  trip.  We  particularly  thank  those  who  have 
aided  us  in  follow-up  conservation  efforts:  Kelvin  Taketa. 
Jim  Maragos,  and  staff  of  The  Nature  Conservancy-Hawaii, 
Christoff  Imboden  and  staff  at  ICBP.  Alex  du  Prel.  Jean-Michael 
Chazine,  Philippe  Siu.  George  Monet.  Graham  Wragg.  the 
Falconers.  Customs  authorities  in  Papeete.  George  Ariyoshi. 
Secretary  and  Minister  to  the  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands,  and 
the  Hon.  Secretary  to  the  Cabinet.  Republic  of  Kiribati. 


50 


TABLE  1 

Plants  reported  from  Caroline  Atoll,  but  considered  to  be 
transient  or  extinct  members  of  the  flora.' 


Scientific  Name 


English  and 
Gilbertese  Names 


Date  Last 
Reported 


Comments 


CLASS  ANGIOSPERMAE 
Family  Graminae 

Eleusine  indica  (L. )  Gaertn. 

Eragrostis  amabilis 

(L.)H.&A. 
Family  Cyperaceae 
°Kyllinga  brevifolia  Rottb. 

Family  Bromeliaceae 
Ananas  comosa  L. 
Family  Liliaceae 


goosegrass.  te  uteute  1 884 

lovegrass,  te  uteute  1884 


kyllinga 


pineapple,  te  bainaboro  1884 


Crinum  sp. 

lily,  te  kiebu 

1884 

Presently 

cultivated 

Family  Moraceae 

°Artocarpus  altilis  (Park.)  Fosb. 

breadfruit,  te  mai 

Presently 
cultivated 

Fiats  carica  L. 

common  fig,  te  biku 

1884 

Family  Basellaceae 

Boussingaultia  gracilis  Miers 

Madeira  vine 

1884 

Family  Leguminosae 

Inocarpus  fagifer 

Tahitian  or  Pacific 

1840 

(Parkins,  ex  Z)  Fosb. 

chestnut,  mape  (Tahiti), 

(=  1 .  fagifents) 

te  ibi 

Family  Euphorbiaceae 

Euphorbia  hirla 

garden  spurge,  sleeping 

1884 

(=  E.  pilulifera) 

plant,  te  kaimatu 

Family  Guttiferae 

Calophyllum  inophyllum  L. 

Alexandrian  laurel. 

1884 

Family  Caricaceae 
Carica  papaya 


Family  Cucurbitaceae 
Cucurbita  pepo  L. 

lpomoea  batatas  L. 


I.pes-caprae  brasiliensis 
(L.)  v.  Ooststr. 


Family  Scrophulariaceae 
Russelia  equisetiformis 
Schlecht. 


tamanu  (Tahiti),  te  itai 


Papaya,  pawpaw, 

te  babaia,  te  mwemwera 


Pumpkin,  te  baukin. 

te  bamakin 

Sweet  potato,  te  kumara 


beach  morning  glory, 
pohuehue  (Hawaii), 
te  ruku 


Coral  plant,  te  kaihaun 
("golden  plant") 


Presently 
cultivated 


Presently 
cultivated 
Presently 
cultivated 


1884 


Introduced  weed 
Introduced  weed 


One  clump  by  cistern.  South  Is., 
on  recently  disturbed  ground 

Introduced  for  cultivated  fruit 

Introduced  ornamental.  One 
small  specimen  found  on  South 
Is.  by  Anne  Falconer,  1990. 
Collection  no.  K-90-14 

Not  yet  established,  2  trees  on 
South  and  Ana-Ana 
Introduced  for  cultivated  fruit 

Introduced  "vine  climbing  over 
portico"  (Trelease  1 884) 

Unsuccessful  introduction  in 
1834.  Food  plant 


Introduced  weed,  unsuccessful 


In  the  1940's.  a  "few  taller 
Calophyllum  and  Pisonia" 
(N.I.D.  1943).  No  other 
reference;  did  observer  confuse 
Calophyllum  with  Cordial 

Cultivated  for  fruit  in  1884. 
not  seen  in  1965.  In  garden  on 
Ana-Ana,  one  on  South  Is.  by 
cistern 

Cultivated  in  1884,  not  found 

in  1965 

Introduced  in  1840,  not  reported 

again  until  this  expedition  (tubers 

brought  in  1988).  Collection 

nos.  K-159,  160 

Found  in  1965  by  copra  shed; 

extensive  searching  on  3 

expeditions  in  1988  and  1990 

failed  to  find  it 

Unsuccessful  introduction  in  19th 
century 


'Since  1988,  the  Falconers  have  added  more  vegetables  and  ornamentals  to  their  ever-expanding  garden:  green 
beans,  lemon  grass,  peppermint,  okra,  banana,  Tahitian  gardenia  (tiare),  tomato,  breadfruit,  red  hibiscus,  etc. 
°Not  previously  reported  from  Caroline  Atoll. 


51 


TAB1.K  2 


Vascular  flora  ol  Caroline  Atoll:  relative  abundance  of  each  species  within  the  major  ecosystems,  with  data  on  seabird  utilization 


Scientific  Name 


(.minion  &  Gilbertese 
Name 


Seabird 
Utilization 


o 
o 

2- 


Nalural   Ecosystems 


Coastal 


Natural     Beach     Town. 
Herb       Scrub      Scrub 
Mat         With 
Suriana 


Inland 


Toum. 

Forest 


A nt h ropogen ic  Ecosystems 

Coconut  Woodlands 

Pisonia    Cocos        Dying     Mixed 

Forest  Plantation     Cocos/     Forest 

Ipomoea    With 

Plantation  Cocos 


TREES 
Pisonia  grandis 

Morinda  citrifolia 
Cocos  nucifera 
Cordia  subcordata 

Pandanus  tectorius 

'Hibiscus  tiliai  ens 

'Thespesia  populnea 

SHRUBS 

Tourneforlia  argentea 
Suriana  maritima 

'Ximenia  americana 
'Scaevola  s<  rit  ea 

Species  A 

HERBS 

Heliotropium  anomalum 

Boerhavia  repens 
Ponulaca  lulea 

Laportea  ruderalis 

'At  hvranthi  s  i  anesi  ens 
Phymatosorus  scolopendria 


I 1  punas  repens 
Ipomoea  nun  ranlha 

Tacca  leontopelaloides 


Lepidium  bidentatum 
Psilotum  million 

Phyllanlbus  amarus 
Sida  falkn 

nana  sp. 
Iiihiilus  i  istoides 


pisonia,  puka  tree, 

te  buka 

Indian  mulberry,  te  mm 

coconut,  te  ni 

sea  trumpet,  kou 

(Hawaii I.  ic  kanawa 

pandanus,  screwpine, 

te  aroka,  te  kaina 

beach  hibiscus,  hau 

(Hawaii).  ic  nui 

milo  (Hawaii ).  te  bingibing 


tree  heliotrope,  te  ren 
bay  cedar,  te  aroa,  te 
mount 

monkeyplum 
scaevola,  saltbush, 
half-flower,  te  mao 


"sand  rose",  hnitiliinn 
( Hau an  I 
pigvine,  te  wao 
yellow  portulaca, 
seaside  purslane. 
te  boimari,  te  hot 
"nettle",  te  ukeuke, 
te  nekeneke 

maile-scented  fern, 
Itittti'c  or  lawai  fern, 
te  raukota,  te  keang 
bunchgrass,  te  uteute 
morning  glory,  wild 
moon-flower,  te  ruku 
Polynesian  or  island 
arrowroot,  pia  t  Hawaii 
&  I  ahiti),  n-  makemake 
peppergrass 
upright  psilotum.  "reed 
fern",  te  kimarawa 

'ilimti  (Hawaii),  te  kaura 
crabgrass,  te  uteute 
puncture  vine,  te  kiebu 


R 

UC 

C 

C 

R-C 

R-VC 

R-O 

UC 

UC 

UC-C 

O 

C 

c 

X   X   o-uc   vc 

O    VC-A 
R 


X     A     UC 
R-UC   R-C 


A      A 
O 


O-A   R-UC 
R-VC   VC 

R 
R-UC   UC-A 


PR 


VC 

R-A    R-A 


UC-C    O 

C-A     C 
R-C     C 


LC     LC 

L.R-A 

R      R 


LR 


A 

L.UC 

L.UC 

R-C 

R-A 

R-C 

C 

O 

O 

A 

A 

C-A 

R-VC 

L.UC 

R 

0 

O 

1..R 
L.R 

A 

UC-A 


UC 


LA 


R-A 


L.O 

LC 
C 


C-A.L 


R-UC 


UC-A     UC    C-A 


R-C     R 

LC     R-UC   UC-C 
O  A 


R-A    R-UC   C-A 
R 

UC      A 


I  \ 


LR 
PR 
PR 
(S) 


Excludes  transient  and  extinct  species  i  |  able  1 1    Species  arranged  according  to  then  overall  abundance  on  the  atoll. 

New  records  foi  Caroline. 

Mot  seen  on  this  expedition,  lasi  seen  1965  K'lapp  &  Sibley,  1971a). 


TABLE  3 

Distribution  and  abundance  of  plant  species  on  Caroline  Atoll.1   Motus  are  arranged  geographically  from 
north  to  south  (windward),  then  similarly  on  the  leeward  side. 


Windward  Motus 


South  Nake  Motus 


N 

L 

B 

W 

c 

A 

N 

P 

S 

N 

B 

N 

N 

A 

T 

S 

P   D 

B 

C 

L 

K 

M 

a 

0 

0 

i 

r 

t 

0 

i 

k 

0 

r 

0 

o 

r 

r 

0 

a    a 

0 

0 

0 

o 

0 

k 

n 

ii 

e 

i 

r 

g 

u 

r 

0 

d 

r 

u 

i 

u 

n    n 

0 

r 

n 

t 

ii 

e 

IT 

s 

d 

s 

b 

t 

1 

t 

t 

d 

t 

n 

d 

t 

d    g 

b 

a 

e 

a 

a 

u 

w 

c 

u 

h 

1 

h 

h 

y 

h 

d 

a 

h 

a    e 

y 

1 

k 

n 

a 
r 

e 
n 

P 

B 

e 
r 

R 

A 

e 
1 

c 
n 

n    r 
u 

P 

a 

e 
n 

B 

i 

d 

t 

i 
g 

r 

0 

s 

0 

c 

r 
u 

a 

s 

1 
m 

a 

r 

t 

k 

n 

d 

h 
e 
r 

s 

d 
e 

1 

TREES(7spp.) 

Pisonia  grandis 

A 

vc 

A 

A 

A 

A 

A 

A 

VC 

A 

R 

R 

VCA 

VC  UC 

R 

R 

R 

Morinda  citrifolia 

UC 

UC 

UC 

O 

R 

UC 

R 

O 

o 

UC  VC 

C 

R   R 

R 

R 

R 

R 

Cocos  nucifera 

LA 

LA 

LR 

LO 

R 

A 

LR 

LR 

Cordia  subcordata 

UC 

UC 

c 

LA 

C 

VC 

C 

VC 

C 

UC 

R 

LA 

Pandanus  tectorius 

LA 

LO 

LA 

"Hibiscus  tiliaceus 

LR 

°Thespesia  populnea 

LR 

SHRUBS  (5  spp.) 

Toumefortia  argentea 

A 

A 

VC 

A 

A 

O 

A 

A 

0 

A 

A 

O 

A 

A 

A 

C 

A  A 

A 

A 

A 

C 

A 

Suriana  maritima 

LR 

LR 

LC 

UC. 
LC 

SkicvoIci  sericea 

S 

Ximenia  americana 

LA 

°Species  A 

HERBS  (15  spp.) 

Heliotropium  anomalum 

C 

VC 

UC 

C 

c 

UC 

UC 

UC 

R 

UC 

C 

0  UC  VC 

C 

c 

0 

UC  UC 

UC  UC 

R 

Boerhavia  repens 

C 

LC 

C 

c 

c 

c 

UC 

C 

A  UC 

c 

VC 

c 

O 

O     R 

R     R 

R 

Portulaca  hitea 

C 

C 

c 

C 

c 

UC 

UC 

c 

c 

A 

A 

A 

A    C 

c 

c 

cue 

O     O 

O     O 

R 

Laportea  ruderalis 

C 

VC 

c 

UC 

UC 

C 

C 

UC 

UC 

c 

o 

O     R 

R     R 

R 

°Achyranthes  canescens 

LC 

O 

o 

c 

o 

LC 

VCVC 

LC 

R 

o 

0 

R     R 

R     R 

R 

Lepturus  repens 

R 

R 

R 

R 

R 

R 

R 

C 

c 

C 

O 

R 

R 

R     R 

R     R 

R 

Phymatosorus 

VC 

LA. 

UC 

UC 

UC 

o 

C 

LA. 

R      R 

scolopendria 

UC 

UC 

Ipomoea  macrantha 

LC 

0 

UC 

o 

A 

Tacca  leontopetaloides 

*LC 

LR 

Psilotum  nudum 

*LR 

LR 

Phyllanthus  amarus 

LC 

Tribulus  cistoides 

s 

Sidafallax 

LR 

Lepidium  Indentation 

S 

*Digitaria  sp. 

s 

53 


TABLE  3  -  continued 


Central 

Southern 

Leeward  Motus 

Leeward  Motus 

T 

%   O 

M 

B 

M 

E 

S 

S 

N 

A 

R 

B 

F 

R 

E 

P 

K 

A 

O 

u 

1 

a 

m 

h 

c 

a 

z 

e 

i 

i 

a 

i 

i 

i 

n 

o 

n 

r 

n 

a 

t 

e 

a 

a 

u 

u 

e 

r 

s 

u 

t 

s 

m 

a 

t 

F 

i 

n 

c 

a 

r 

r 

r 

1 

r 

f 

d 

h 

r 

e 

0 

o 

- 

a 

r    E 

g 

i 

k 

w 

a 

k 

1 

0 

e 

- 

b 

a 

i 

n 

a 

A 

1 

e    a 

i 

k 

i 

1 
i 

a 

1 

d 

e 

t 

n 

CT 

f 

1 

a 
1 

u 

i 
a 

n 

a 

q    c 
u    h 

n 

b 

i) 

a 

a 

1 

e 

a 

C 

r 
a 

b 

t 

n  M 
C    o 

y   i 
u : 

TREES(7spp.) 

Pisonia  grandis 

C 

VC 

UC 

C 

A 

O 

R 

A 

A 

C 

A 

VC 

A 

32 

82 

1 

Morinda  citrifolia 

R 

R 

R 

R 

R 

R 

D 

UC 

R 

R 

R 

C 

30 

77 

LAI? 

<  .'.  os  nucifera 

LR 

LR 

LO 

LR 

LR 

LR 

LO 

LC 

17 

44 

AI.RI 

Cordia  subcordata 

O 

UC 

C 

O 

LO 

O 

UC 

C 

C 

C 

C 

C 

23 

59 

I 

Pandanus  tectorius 

R 

C 

C 

LR 

LR 

LR 

9 

23 

LAI? 

"Hibiscus  tiliaceus 

1 

3 

I(AI,RI?) 

"Thespesia  populnea 

1 

3 

1  i  AI.RI?) 

SHRUBS  (5  spp.) 

Tournefortia  argentea 

A 

A 

A 

A 

A 

R 

C 

C 

R 

A 

UC 

A 

A 

A 

A 

A 

39 

100 

1 

Suriana  maritima 

R 

UC 

LR 

LR 

LR 

O 

10 

19 

1 

Si  ,h  \  ola  serii  ea 

1 

3 

1 

'Ximenia  mucin  una 

1 

3 

Species  A 

S 

1 

3 

1 

HERBS  (15  spp.) 

Heliotropium  anomalum 

C 

C 

C 

C 

C 

R 

C 

C 

R 

R 

UC 

UC 

C 

C 

C 

UC 

38 

98 

I 

Boerhavia  repens 

C 

UC 

UC 

C 

UC 

R 

R 

R 

UC 

R 

UC  UC  UC 

O 

c 

34 

88 

1 

Portulaca  lutea 

c 

c 

uc 

R 

R 

R 

R 

UC 

R 

UC 

C 

UC 

C 

LC 

37 

95 

1 

Laportea  ruderalis 

uc 

uc 

o 

c 

uc 

R 

R 

R 

R 

R 

UC  VC  L1C 

O 

c 

32 

82 

1 

\i  In ranthes  i  anescens 

uc 

o 

R 

uc 

LA 

R 

R 

UC 

R 

o 

C 

o 

29 

72 

I 

Lepturus  repens 

R 

R 

R 

R 

UC 

R 

R 

R 

VC 

27 

69 

1 

Phymatosorus  scolopendr 

uO 

R 

uc 

14 

3d 

1 

Ipomoea  macrantha 

O 

R 

7 

18 

I 

Idcca  leontopetaloides 

3 

RI.AI  * 

PsilotUtn  milium 

3 

I 

Phyllanthus  animus 

3 

X 

Tributes  cistoides 

3 

1 

Sidafallax 

3 

I 

I  epidium  bidentatum 

S 

2 

5 

I 

'Digitaria  sp. 

1 

3 

•> 

Species  arranged  according  to  frequency  of  occurrence.  List  excludes  transient  and  extinct  members  of  the  flora  i  [able  1 1 
No.  motus  ha\  ing  a  particular  species.  di\  ided  in  total  no.  motus  \  100'  I 
New  records  foi  Caroline. 
■  Not  seen  on  three  visits,  bul  possiblj  still  present. 


54 


TABLE  4 

Sizes  of  Pacific  atoll  floras,  with  emphasis  on  the 
percentages  of  indigenous  plants.1 


Total2 

No. 

No. 

Species 

% 

Island  Group 

Atoll 

Species 

Indigenous 

Indigenous 

Source 

Caroline  Is. 

Kapingamarangi 

98 

38 

39 

Niering,  1962 

(Fed.  States 

of  Micronesia) 

Cook  Is. 

Aitutaki 

45 

50 

Stoddart  & 

(New 

(motus) 

Gibbs.  1975 

Zealand) 

Rarotonga 
(motus) 

49 

ca.  60 

Stoddart  & 
Fosberg,  1972 

Gilbert  Is. 

Onotoa 

60 

50 

83 

Moul,  1957 

(Rep.  of 

Tarawa 

109 

28 

26 

Catala,  1957 

Kiribati) 

Northwest 

Kure 

42 

23 

55 

Lamoureux,  1961; 

Hawaiian  Is. 

Clay,  1961 

(USA) 

Laysan 

38 

27 

71 

Ely  &  Clapp,  1973 

Line  Is. 

Caroline 

27 

23(25?) 

85(93?) 

This  paper 

(Kiribati) 

Christmas 
(Kiritimati) 

69 

19 

28 

Garnett,  1983 

Fanning 

123 

23 

19 

Wester.  1985 

Flint 

37 

14 

38 

St.  John  & 
Fosberg,  1937 

Maiden 

9 

9 

100 

Garnett,  1983 

Palmyra 

58 

21 

36 

Wester,  1985 

Starbuck 

7 

4 

57 

Garnett,  1983 
(incomplete, 
little  known) 

Vostok 

3 

3 

100 

Clapp  &  Sibley, 
1971b;  Kepler, 
1990c 

Washington 

91 

25 

27 

Wester.  1985 

Marshall  Is. 

Ailuk 

56 

26 

46 

Fosberg.  1955 

(Fed. 

Arno 

125 

40 

32 

Hatheway,  1953 

States  of 

Enewetak 

128 

55 

43 

Lamberson,  1987 

Micronesia) 

Jaluit 

288 

55 

21 

Fosberg  & 
Sachet,  n.d. 

Jemo 

34 

17 

50 

Fosberg,  1955 

Kwajalein 

89 

25 

28 

Fosberg,  1955, 
1959 

Lae 

61 

35 

57 

" 

Likiep 

91 

31 

34 

" 

Taka 

23 

18 

78 

Fosberg,  1955 

Ujae 

61 

32 

52 

Fosberg,  1955, 
1959 

Ujelang 

50 

29 

58 

" 

Utirik 

55 

26 

47 

'* 

Wotho 

40 

28 

70 

" 

Phoenix  Is. 

Kanton 

164 

14 

9 

Degener & 

(Kiribati) 

(Abariringa) 

Gillaspy,  1955 

129 

18 

14 

Garnett,  1983 

Birnie 

3 

3 

100 

Fosberg  & 
Sachet,  (n.d.) 

Enderbury 

23 

18 

78 

" 

Nikumaroro 

35 

17 

49 

" 

Orona 

ca.  29 

19 

ca.  66 

" 

McKean 

7 

7 

100 

" 

Phoenix 

6 

6 

100 

" 

Manra 

ca.  18 

14 

ca.  77 

" 

55 


TABLE  4 

continued 

TotaF 

No. 

No. 

Species 

', 

Island  Group 

Atoll 

Species 

Indigenous 

Indigenous 

Source 

Society  Is. 

Tetiaroa 

95 

47 

49 

Sachet  & 
Fosberg.  1983 

Solomon  Is. 

Ontong  Java 

1 50 

58 

39 

Bayliss-Smith. 
1973 

Tokelau  Is. 

Nukunono 

55 

35 

64 

Parham.  1971 

(N.Z.) 

Tuamotu  Is. 

Raroia 

121 

39 

32 

Stoddart  & 

(France) 

Sachet,  1969 

Rarioa 

135 

54 

40 

Doty.  1954 

Takapoto 

106 

33 

31 

Sachet.  1983 

Outlyers 

Clipperton 
(U.K.) 

31 

14 

45 

Sachet.  1962 

Oeno 

17 

14 

82 

St.  John  & 

(U.K.) 

Philipson.  1960 

Wake 

94 

20 

21 

Fosberg  & 
Sachet.  1969 

An  updated  version  of  Table  1  I,  p.  105.  Stoddart  and  Gibbs  ( 1975). 

:Number  of  species  of  those  indigenous  are  not  always  comparable.  Ferns  are  usually  included.  bu( 
certain  ornamentals  may  not  be.  Artocarpus,  Morinda,  and  Pandanus  may  be  indigenous,  aboriginal 
introductions,  or  both.  Without  its  full  scientific  name,  a  species  has  an  unknown  biogeographical 

status. 


56 


E    g 
#1 


s  s 


i  3 

Is 


I    I 

«  .a 


1    " 
—    P 

I  5 
1     . 

a  j 


.a     .8 


5  a.  i 
1    I 

o  a. 


It3 
»    1    B 


It* 


ss 


2  < 


I   I* 


X  X  X  X   X 


m    ci    f*% 


o  o   o  o 


s  y  S  s 

©  ©   o  c> 


X  X  X  X   X 


i/-i    w-i    vi    >©    t— 


- 

X 

,3 

^ 

< 

,3 

<•? 

3 

8 

5 

I 

8  S  *  K  3 

©  ©  ©  d  © 


X   x   X   XXX   XXXXXXXXXXXXXX   XX 


X      XXXX    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    XX 


X    X    XXX    XXXXXX      X    X    XX    X        X    X 


X    XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 


XX   XXXX   xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


XXXX        X      XX 


XX      XX      X 


xx=xxxxSxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


•OooO-cS10™™^^^ 


©    ©    ©    r*    ©    —    O    —    —   M   M   m    —   m 


>©(■-]_  v©vi>©"T_,'©r-oooo'/ir->0'»«v>p-'0*or-,©'0<>r-r-  *  2  2 


^---r)nM-NM----NN------n-H 


n   ©  *  —  ei 


ioei<Nmwi*f«*t(*»ci*rc>w^,'ir'i*'>,r 


R?      8 


"">    -*    "t    P.    ""(    ^ 
O    f*i    ^    ^1    (N    f*i 


II 


|  | 

8    .2 


t.N 


<  £  ill  J3 


3      3-33 

o  |    «    §    «    o  ^ 

oazSSuSzS 


i  1  §  -2 1  s 

«  s  §  .a  a  s. 
s  «  *  s.  i  «  5 

s  8  *  I  s 

SSps 


3-!J 


I   ill 


i"  1 J  5  i  1 1 

1  u  2  m  03  Z  a. 


I  Z  "a   1 

jlll 
I  a  £  s 


v    h   vi 


5  * 

3  S 


"S 1 1 

3  j  3 

in 


s 

i 

I 

1 


57 


u 

1  g 

1  £• 


il 


3      |S 

3     "I 


2    3 

.s  I 


5  _ 

il 


a 


6  o 

§  I  £ 

-  9 

O  O    — 


=     = 

«S    ^    — 


6  o 


Ov     —     w 


■_-'_-     x    C    at 


HS<     o 


<   U   U   (J   O  a:   U 


uoS 


<  O   U   O   3  a!   O 


O  U  O   <  _J 

uuu-r9o      i 

<   3    3   3    O    OC    3  -JO 


o  o  o  o 

<   3    3   3    <J    OS    3 


<a<KDa:>o 


O  O  -1  o 

V  =  =  U        as  oi 

<a:a:OO0£3O_}-J 


<OOa;aiacOa: 


<  a:  a:  a:  x  x 


>  3  O  O   X  X 


CJ   3    O    X    X   X 


U   O   X   X    X 


V    U   X   X 


o 

X   X 


_    - 


>■§ 


Ml 


§   fi 


•S.   S-   «    P    i 

Ml  8.  > 


J  <3 


1 1 


il 


4  - 


u  < 


o% 


j£i 


1 
& 


£1 


5     3 


s 


a! 

m  _  •? 

8>  a  3 


II 

ill 


■C     « 


•S  s 
b  s 

.1 

&  g 

II 
1 5 


I  -g  I 

Ji| 


u     a 


■S*i 


S     8 


■a*  i 

II. 


.5  i  !  .s  S  ) 
_!  .     £  Q  z  z 


58 


TABLE  7 

Widths  of  pioneer  herb  mats  on  seaward-  and 
lagoon-facing  shores,  Caroline  Atoll. 

Average  Width  of  Pioneer  Herb  Mat  (m) 
Bordering  Sea        Bordering  Lagoon 

Leeward  Motus  18.5  4.2 

(3-81)  (0-28) 
Windward  Motus          36.0  0.9 

(24-69)  (0-3) 


TABLE  8 

Species-area  relationships  of  six  Pacific  islands 
with  entirely  indigenous  flora. 


Island 

Area 

No.  Species 

Maiden 

39.3  sq  km 

9 

Starbuck 

16.2  sq  km 

6 

McKean 

57  ha 

7 

Phoenix 

49  ha 

6 

Vostok 

24  ha 

3 

Birnie 

20  ha 

4 

Islands  are  arranged  according  to  decreasing  area. 
Data  is  from  Garnett  ( 1983),  Fosberg  and  Sachet 
(n.d.).  Clapp  and  Sibley  ( 1971b),  and  pers.  obs. 


TABLE  9 

Area  of  plant  communities  on  the  islets  of  Caroline  Atoll. 


Total 

Area  (ha) 

Area  (ha) 

Unvegetated  Habitats 

41.39 

Coral  Rubble  and  Sand 

41.39 

Natural  Plant  Communities 

261.41 

Natural  Herb  Mats 

67.73 

Beach  Scrub  with  Suriana 

1.49 

Pandanus  Forest1 

3.38 

Tournefortia  Scrub  and  Forest 

125.25 

Cordia  Forest: 

1.39 

Pisonia  Forest 

62.17 

Anthropogenic  Community 

96.14 

Coconut  Woodlands  96. 1 4 

Total  Area  Above  High  Water  398.94 

1  Pure  Pandanus  only.  Also  mixed  with  Pisonia.  Tournefortia.  and  Cocos. 

2  Cordia.  where  mixed  with  Pisonia  and  Tournefortia,  is  included  in  totals 
for  those  forest  communities. 


59 


TABLE  10 

Stature  and  extent  of  Toumefortia  in  the  major  habitats 
of  Caroline  Atoll. 


Av.  Hgt.  (m)     Av.  Width  (m)      Toumefortia     No.  No. 

(in)  (m)  Cover        Motus  Transects 


Natural  Herb  Mat 

Toumefortia 
Scrub  &  Forest 
Toumefortia  - 
Pisonia  Forest 


1.4 

(0.3-1.8) 

6 

(0.3-15) 

9.5 

(5-15) 


49 
(3-198) 

55 
(2-287) 

98 
(8-284) 


25 

14 

20 

(5-95) 

81 

38 

71 

(5-100) 

47 

18 

27 

(5-90) 

TABLE  1 1 

Distribution  of  well-developed  (>I0  m  height)  Pisonia  forests  on  the  motus 

of  Caroline  Atoll.1  Motus  and  transects  are  arranged  according  to  the 

decreasing  height  of  their  Pisonia  groves.  Capitals  indicate  those  motus 

whose  forests  were  felled  for  Cocos  plantations  from  1916-20. 


Area  of 

Pisonia 

Pisonia 

Motu  Area 

Motu  &  Transect 

Height  (m) 

(ha) 

(ha) 

PIG 

21* 

3.36 

7.21 

NAKE,  Transect  4 

20* 

20.79 

107.46 

Booby 

20* 

0.12 

0.84 

NORTH  PIG 

20* 

1.83 

5.44 

NORTH  BROTHERS 

18* 

0.43 

1.71 

NAKE,  Transect  3  (central) 

15* 

20.79 

107.46 

LONG,  Transect  O 

15* 

15.00 

75.98 

BROTHERS 

15* 

0.37 

4.31 

Ana-Ana 

15* 

0.93 

2.16 

Danger 

15* 

0.39 

2.71 

NAKE,  Transect  2 

14* 

20.79 

107.46 

Bird 

14* 

1.70 

4.05 

WINDWARD,  Transect  2 

14- 

2.97 

11.42 

Raurau 

14* 

1.07 

3.48 

CRESCENT 

13- 

0.51 

3.10 

Mannikiba,  Transect  1 

12* 

1.13 

21.49 

Shark 

12- 

2.60 

7.98 

NAKE,  Transect  3  (west) 

12- 

20.79 

107.46 

LONG,  Transect  1 2 

12- 

15.00 

75.98 

Pisonia 

11* 

0.86 

2.45 

Matawa 

1  1 

0.07 

1.71 

Nautonga 

11 

0.02 

0.34 

NAKE,  Transect  3  (southwest) 

II- 

20.79 

107.46 

Kimoa 

11 

0.59 

1.80 

Emerald 

1  1 

3.20 

8.34 

Eitei 

1  1 

0.38 

1.42 

LONG.  Transect  B 

10- 

15.00 

75.98 

LONG.  Transect  8 

10 

15.00 

75.98 

NAKH.  Transect  1 

10- 

20.79 

107.46 

WINDWARD.  Transect  1 

10 

2.97 

11.42 

Blackfin 

10- 

0.41 

2.62 

NORTH  ARUNDEL 

1  It- 

0.18 

0.91 

Toumefortia  or  Cordia  mas  be  present,  but  sub-dominant  to  Pisonia. 
*  90-100%  canopy  cover. 
50  SO',  canop)  cover. 


60 


TABLE  12 


Area  and  Dimensions  of  Pisonia  grandis  on  Vostok,  Flint,  and  five  islets  of  Caroline  Atoll. 


Island/Islet 

Area  of 

No.  trees 

Mean 

Range  of 

Mean 

Range 

Mean 

Range  of  base 

Pi  si  >n  ui 

or  main 

Heigth 

Heights 

cbh1 

of  cbh 

base2 

circumferences 

ha 

trunks 

(m) 

(m) 

(m) 

(m) 

(m) 

(m) 

CAROLINE 

62.17 

North  Pig 

1.83 

25 

19 

11-21 

221 

110-359 

261 

205-470 

Brothers 

0.37 

10 

15 

15 

140 

50-219 

243 

154-340 

Pig 

3.36 

5 

16 

12-17 

338 

290-660 

282 

230-333 

North  Brothers 

0.43 

3 

18 

18 

314 

293-332 

Long 

15.00 

3 

15 

15 

414 

282-500 

Total  for  above 

islets  at  Caroline 

20.99 

46 

18 

11-21 

213 

50-660 

293 

154-500 

VOSTOK 

1 3.5 

58 

18 

10-25 

218 

67-510 

FLINT 

approx.  4 

(fragmented)     20 

17 

8-30 

160 

60-200 

598 

100-1000 

cbh  =  'ircumference  at  1 .5  m. 
base  =  base  circumference  at  0.3  m. 


TABLE  13 

Number  of  trees  and  areas  planted  in  Cocos  on  Caroline's  islets 
during  the  major  planting  era  ( 1916-1920).  also  showing  remnant  Cocos  data  for  1990. 


Approx. 

1916- 

%  1990 

Approx. 

Forest 

Islet 

Area  Forest  of  Scrub  Usable 

No. 

Area 

% 

Planted 

Islet 

Area 

(ha) 

for  Cocos  in  19901  (ha) 

Cocos 
Planted 

Cocos2 
(ha) 

Cocos 
1990 

in  Cocos 

Town. 

Pis. 

Other 

Cocos 

Total 

70  Yrs  Ago 

South 

104.41 

4.20 

0 

1.10 

80.00 

86.10 

13.006 

94.90 

477 

100% 

Nake 

107.46 

30.65 

20.8 

9.41 

5.75 

66.61 

10,544 

76.97 

6 

100% 

Long 

75.98 

32.20 

15.00 

- 

2.40 

49.60 

1.343 

9.80 

3 

20% 

Tridacna(Al)1 

9.08 

7.97 

0 

0.18 

8.15 

910 

6.64 

0 

82% 

Arundel 

7.34 

4.36 

0.95 

- 

0 

5.31 

646 

4.71 

0 

89% 

N.  Arundel  (A2) 

0.91 

0.33 

0.19 

- 

few  trees 

0.52 

69 

0.50 

0 

100% 

Brothers 

4.31 

2.00 

0.37 

- 

0.0 1 

2.38 

315 

2.30 

0.2 

97% 

N.  Brothers  (A3) 

1.71 

0.68 

0.43 

- 

few  trees 

1.11 

180 

1.31 

0 

100% 

Pig 

7.25 

1.61 

3.36 

- 

0.03 

5.00 

538 

3.93 

0.4 

79% 

N.  Pig(A4) 

5.44 

1.31 

1.84 

- 

0 

3.15 

402 

2.93 

0 

93% 

Crescent  (A5) 

3.10 

1.56 

0.51 

- 

0 

2.07 

228 

1.66 

0 

80% 

Windward  (A6) 

11.42 

5.70 

2.97 

- 

0 

8.67 

1,299 

9.48 
215.10 

(1 

100% 

'  "Usable  area"  does  not  include  unvegetaied  rubble  or  natural  herb  mats. 
-  Based  on  Caroline's  planting  densities  of  28  x  28  sq  ft  (Young  ca.  1922). 
1  The  "A"  series  of  islet  names  are  from  Youna  (ca.  1922). 


TABLE  14 

Species  diversity  in  Pisonia  forests  of  decreasing  maturity.  Caroline  Atoll.  Motus  are 
arranged  according  to  the  degree  of  coverage  of  their  constituent  Pisonia  trees;  within 

these  groupings.the  motu  order  is  dependent  upon  the  total  number  of  plant  species 

within  this  same  habitat.  Note  that  there  is  an  inverse  relationship  between  the  purilv  <<\ 

the  true  Pisonia  forest  and  species  diversity. 


Canopy 

Canopy 

Av. 

Total  Ni 

jmbers  of  Species 

No. 

Cover 

Hgt. 

No. 

Trees 

Shrubs 

Herbs 

Transects 

(mi 

Spp. 

(inch  Pisonia) 

100%  (Pisonia  only) 

13 

1 

1 

0 

0 

1 

100%  (co-dominant  present) 

15 

3.4 

2 

0 

5 

9 

90-95% 

10 

5.2 

5 

1 

7 

9 

50-909f 

10 

6.2 

5 

2 

7 

15 

25-50% 

7 

6.2 

4 

1 

6 

5 

<25%' 

9 

5.63 

3 

2 

9 

6 

Motus  with  one 

6 

4.0 

3 

1 

3 

2 

Pisonia  tree  only 

South  Island  not  included,  as  its  Pisonia  is  too  rare  and  fragmented. 


62 


t ropic  of  CancT 


*  . 


HAWAII 


20 


equator 


KINGMAN    REEF 
■  PALMYRA    ATOLL 

^  •  WASHINGTON    IS. 

/  •   FANNING   IS. 


KIRITIMATI 

[CHRISTMAS    IS. I 


10 


•  JARVIS   IS. 


PHOENIX 

group 

TOKELAU 


AMERICAN 
SAMOA 


KIRIBATI 


Q 


MALDEN 
IS. 


FILIPPO    REEF 


STARBUCK   IS 


o 

-0 
VOSTOK    IS. 

FLINT   IS. 


CAROLINE 
ATOLL 


^"AS  ,s 


10 


FRENCH 
POLYNESIA 


WESTERN 
SAMOA 

NIUE 


COOK  ISLANDS 


=>*::».>, 


'K 


«.<,"*, 


tf 


.TAHITI  * 


y  is 


u^ 


<© 


r<?20 
o 


tropic  of  Capricofn 


Fig.  I.   Line  Islands:  geographic  location  in  the  Pacific  Ocean. 


63 


WINDWARD 
ISLETS 


SOUTHERN 
LEEWARD 
ISLETS 


CAROLINE    ATOLL 


Fig.  2.  Caroline  Atoll.  Republic  of  Kiribati,  with  newly-named  islets.  Based 
on  photos  by  the  Royal  New  Zealand  Air  Force,  Aerial  Plan  No.  1036 
9d-h  ( 1986).  Photogrammetric  Branch,  Dept.  of  Lands  and  Survey, 
RNZAF.  New  Zealand. 


Fig.  3.  Main  marae  on  Nake  Island,  Caroline  Atoll,  based  on  a  plan  published 
by  the  Solar  Eclipse  Expedition  ( Holden  &  Qualtrough,  1 884 ).  Figures 
in  the  margins  show  side  views  of  the  peripheral  blocks  shown  in  the 
plan.  The  two  end  walls  are  represented  in  ground  plan. 


Fig.  4.  Caroline  Atoll,  as  surveyed  by  John  Arundel,  1883  This  is  still  the 
standard  hydrological  chart  for  the  atoll  (Admiralty  Chart  No.  9791. 
Thoughquiteaccurate.it  has  never  been  used  in  scientific  publications 


Fig.   5.   Caroline  Atoll,  as  charted  bj  the  Solar  Eclipse  Party,  also  in  1883 
(Holden  &  Qualtrough.  IS84). 


M 


ISO'lS'  150  I4W 


I50°I3' 


CAROLINE 
ISLAND 

From  RO.  S28. 


Boat  Entrance 
Settlement/' j' 


2  nautical  miles 


Fig.  6.  Caroline  Atoll,  a  modified  version  of  the  Solar  Eclipse  Party's  map 
(1883)  as  portrayed  by  Bryan  (1942).  Though  highly  inaccurate, 
modifications  of  this  map  have  been  used  in  all  publications  since 
Bryan  (1942). 

N 

t 


SURVEY 
TRANSECTS 

0  campsites 


I 


CAROLINE    ATOLL 

SCALE  1   y*  000 
$00  0  900        IOO0  2000 

I  —  I I I I 1 

matari 


Caroline   Atoll 


_kJ 


Fig.  7.  This  map,  by  Clapp  &  Sibley  (1971a),  was  based  on  Fig.  6. 


PERIMETER 
SURVEYS 


CAROLINE    ATOLL 

SCALE   134  000 
500  0  900       I0O0  2000 

inn I 1 1 1 


Fig.  8.  Caroline  Atoll:  survey  transects.  The  distance  covered  was  13.3  km.  Fig.  9.  Caroline  Atoll:  perimetersurveys.  The  distance  covered  was  19.3km. 


• 


-  coral 
(Acropora  spp.) 

-  mollusks 
(Tridacna  maxima) 

-  coral 

(Fungia  granulata) 


m*    -  Holothurioidea 
(Ludwigothuria  sp. 

(ww    -  algae 

(Porolithon  sp.) 

#      -  algae 

[Halimeda  sp.) 


iMiiafei^*"^^"* 


edge         lateral 


central 


Coral  limestone 
Sand 


lateral    I  edge 


ZONES 

Fig    10. 1  )iagrammatic  representation  of  a  portion  of  the  outstanding  Acropora-Tridacna  reels  connecting  the  islets  Ana-Ana,  Kimoa  and  Tridacna. 
(Tridacna  maxima),  thickly  studding  the  reel',  attain  densities  of  80  per  square  meter  (Sirenko  &  Koltun.  Subehapter  1.4). 


Giant  clams 


RARE   AND 
LOCALIZED    PLANTS 

|^< |  PANDANUS 

|    m    |  SCAEVOLA 

|     •     |  PSILOTUM 

["">"]  HIBISCUS. THE 

j         |  TACCA 

fT~|  TRIBULUS 

[~T~]  SPECIES    A 

|    a    |  LEPIDIUM 

|    0     I  PHYLLANTHU 


PHYMATOSOR 
SCOLOPENDR 


Pig    I  i    i  nnii'  distribution  map  "l  rare  and/or  localized  plants  on  Caroline 

Hibisi  us  liliaceus,  I  epidium  bidenlalum,  Pandanus  tectorius. 

Phyllanihus  amarus,  Psilolum  nudum,  8  m  vola  terit  ea,  Sida  fallax, 

leontopelaloides,   Thespesia  populnea,  Tribulus  cistoides, 

Ximenia  americana,  and  Species  V  Psilotum  ma\  still  exist  on  Nake 


Fig.  1 2.  Transect  distribution  map  of  the  fern  Phymatosorus  scolopendria  on 

Caroline  Atoll 


66 


LEPTURUS     REPENS 


COCOS   NUCIFERA 

tj££3  Healthy  Cocos 

■'.'■]  Dying  Cocoa-  Ipomoea  Fore 

"....]  Mixed   Forest 

■  Isolated  groves 


CAROLINE    ATOLL 


CAROLINE   ATOLL 

SCALE   i    J*   00'.' 
900  O  SOO       1040  1000 

'■■■■I I I I I 


Fig.  13.  Transect  distribution  map  of  the  grass  Lepturus  repens  on  Caroline         Fig.  14.  Entire  distribution  map  of  the  coconut  Cocos  nucifera  on  Caroline 
Atoll.  Arrows  indicate  areas  of  highest  density.  Atoll. 


LAPORTEA  RUDERALIS 


ACHYRANTHES  CANESCENS 


CAROLINE   ATOLL 


Fig.  15.  Transect  distribution  map  of  Laporlea  ruderalis  on  Caroline  Atoll.         Fig.  16.  Transect  distribution  map  of Achyranthescanescens.  Arrows  indicate 
Arrows  indicate  areas  of  highest  density.  areas  of  highest  density. 


67 


BOEflHAVIA     REPENS 


J     PISONIA 
I        1     PISONIACOBOIA 

~2     PI  SONIA  •  TOURNEFORTI  A 
[^H    Ml  XEO    FOREST 


PISONIA   GRANDIS 


Fig.  17.  Transect  distribution  map  of  pigvine,  Boerhavia  repens,  Caroline         Fig.  18.  Entire  distribution  map  of  the  buka  tree,  Pisonia  grandis,  Caroline 
Atoll.  Arrows  indicate  areas  of  highest  density.  Atoll.  Arrows  indicate  forests  from  10  to  21  m  tall. 


POBTULACA    LUTEA 


SURIANA    MARITIMA 


CAROLINE    ATOLL 

•CALI  i  J«  ooo 

900  0  SOO       1MO  1040 

'■■■■' I I I I 


Fig    19  Transect  distribution  map  of  the  succulent  herb  Portulaca  lutea,        Fig.  20.  Transect  and  perimeter  survey  distribution  map  of  Suriana  maritma. 
Caroline  Atoll.  Arrows  indicate  pure  Portulaca  Hats.  Arrows  indicate  areas  of  highest  densit] 


68 


IPOMOEA     MACRANTHA 


Fig.  21.  Transect  distribution  map  of  Ipomoeamacrantha.  Entire  distribution 

is  shown  for  South  and  Nake  Islands.  Arrows  indicate  areas  having         Fig.  22.  Entire  distribution  map  of  CorJiu  subcordata.  Arrows  indicate  small 
significant  amounts  of  this  vine.  but  monolypic.  stands. 


m  TOURNEFORTIA 

]       SAVANNA"-  HERB  MAT 

'"■•1  MIXED   FOREST 

HELIOTROPIUM  \        ^      ~.%     \  ^s;  TOURNEFORT I A  ■  MOR  IN  DA 

ANOMALUM 


TOURNEFORTIA    ARGEN 


CAROLINE    ATOLL 


Fig.  24.  Entire  distribution  map  of  Tournefortia  argentea.  Because  this  shrub 
Fig.  23.  Entire  distribution  map  of  Heliotropium  anomalum.  Arrows  indicate  dominates  Caroline^  woodlands,  there  are  no  individual  arrows  to 

areas  of  highest  density.  indicate  areas  of  high  density. 


69 


MORINDA    CITRIFOLIA 


CAROLINE    ATOLL 

SCALE  1:34000 
0          0          S00      I0O0  2000 

'■■■■' 1 I  I  I 


100 


in 


80 


C3 

z 


< 


50 


30 


20  - 


10 


TOURNEFORTIA         PISONIA 
NATURAL  FORESTS 


MIXED      COCOS  HOUSE  SITE 
ANTHROPOGENIC  FORESTS 


Fig.  25.  Transect  distribution  map  of  Morinda  citrifolia.  The  outlined  area  on 
rridacna  Islet  (northeast  of  South  Island)  encloses  Toumefortia- 
\4orinda  forest.  Arrows  indicate  areas  of  highest  density. 


Fig.  26.  Evidence  for  the  indigenous  status  of  Morinda  citrifolia  on  Caroline 
Atoll :  percentage  cover  on  transects  within  natural  and  anthropogenic 
forests.  Morinda  occurs  on  30  ( 7796 )  motus.  never  in  a  "planted" 
situation. 


70 


LEFT  CIRCLE 

MAJOR  PLANT  COMMUNITIES 
UNVEGETATED 
HERB  MAT 


RIGHT  CIRCLE 
PERCENT  INDIGENOUS 


^1 


TOURNEFORTIA 
PISONIA 

cocos 

SURIANA 
PANDANUS 


INDIGENOUS 

ABORIGINAL  INTRODUCTION 

RECENT  INTRODUCTION 


Wll    HOUSE  SITE 


MIXED  FOREST  WITH  COCOS 


NODDY  ROCK 
0.02  ha 


0.005 


0.015 
(75%) 


SKULL  ISLET  0.005 

0.02  ha  (5%) 

^s^,^      0.019 

40l§&i0?  (95%) 


MOTU  ATIBU 
0.02  ha 


0.004 
(2%) 


r 


0.02 

I*  (98%) 


REEF-FLAT  ISLET 
0.09  ha 


fc 


0.02 
(22%) 


Fig.  27.  Plant  communities  and  amount  of  indigenous  vegetation  on  motus  less  than  0.I  ha,  Caroline  Atoll.  The  left  "pie"  depicts  the  relative  amount  of  amotu's 
total  surface  area  covered  by  each  plant  community:  numbers  indicate  actual  area  in  hectares.  The  right  "pie"  depicts  the  numbers  and  percentages  of 
indigenous  and  anthropogenic  species  per  motu.   Data  is  based  on  the  vegetation  maps  for  each  motu  (Figs.  37-57)  and  Tables  2  and  9. 


71 


1.01  (5% 


AZURE  ISLE 
0.20  ha 


o.ii  m 

(55%H 


0.04 
20%) 


MOTU  NAUTONGA 
0.34  ha 


0.13(38%) 


0.02  (6%) 


(11%) 


0.08  (24%) 


SCARLET  CRAB  ISLET 
0.46  ha 

0.11  (24%) 


0.18(39%) 


FISHBALL  ISLET 
0.57  ha 

0.16(28%) 


0.17(30%)^^^ 


0.01 


0.03 


MOTU  KOTA 
0.64  ha 


0.29 
(45%) 


Fig.  28.  Plant  communities  and  amount  of  indigenous  \  egetation  on  motus  0.2  to  0.7  ha.  Caroline  Atoll.  See  Fig.  27  for  explanation  of  the  figure. 


72 


BOOBY  ISLET 
0.84  ha        0.12 
(14%) 


o.27  m 

(32%)  \ 


0.41 
(49%) 


BOSUN  BIRD  ISLET 
0.86  ha 


0.25 

(30%) 


^0.20 

(23%) 


NORTH  ARUNDEL  ISLET 
0.91  ha 

0.33 

(36%) 


0.27 
(30%) 


10 

(100%) 


Fig.  29a.     Plant  communities  and  amount  of  indigenous  vegetation  on  motus  0.8  to  25.0  ha,  Caroline  Atoll.  See  Fig.  27  for  explanation  of  the  figure. 


73 


MOTU  MOUAKENA 
1.00  ha 

0.26 

(26%) 


0.38 
(38%) 


0.36 
(36%) 


MOTU  EITEI 
1.41  ha 

0.38 
(27%) 


0.38 

(27%) 


0.57 
(40%) 


CORAL  ISLET 
1.07  ha 


0.13(8%)      0.07 
(4%) 


MOTU  MATAWA 
1.71  ha 


0.68 
(40%) 


0.78 

(46%) 


0.52 
(30%) 


0.07  (4%) 


(26%) 


Fig.  29b.     Plain  communities  and  amount  of  indigenous  vegetation  on  motus  0.8  to  25.0  ha,  Caroline  Atoll    Sec  Fig.  27  for  explanation  of  the  figur 


74 


NORTH  BROTHERS  ISLET 
1.71  ha 


0.43 

(25%) 


0.48 
(28%) 


0.68 
(40%) 


MOTU  KIMOA 

1.80  ha 

0.59 

(33%) 


0.50 
(28%) 


12 
(100%) 


LONE  PALM  ISLET 
1.99  ha 


0.95 

(48%) 


0.39 
(19%) 


0.61 
W  (31%) 


MOTU  ANA-ANA 
2.16  ha 


0.93 

(43%) 


47 
(22%) 


(7%) 


0.21  (10%) 


Fig.  29c.     Plant  communities  and  amount  of  indigenous  vegetation  on  motus  0.8  to  25.0  ha,  Caroline  Atoll.  See  Fig.  27  for  explanation  of  the  figure. 

75 


0.69 
(28%) 


1  (7%) 


BLACKFIN  ISLET 

2.62  ha 

0.78 
(30%) 


0.63 


0.80 
(30%) 


1  (11%) 


DANGER  ISLET 
2.71  ha 


0.77 
(28%) 


10 
(100%) 


CRESCENT  ISLET 
3.10  ha 


1.56 
(50%) 


0.61 
(20%) 


10 
(100%) 


Fig.  24d.     Plant  communities  and  amount  of  indigenous  vegetation  on  tnotus  0.8  to  25.0  ha,  Caroline  Atoll.  See  Fig.  27  lor  explanation  of  the  figure. 

76 


MOTU  RAURAU  1.71 

3.48  ha  /"""    ~~"~~\  (49%) 

(31%)%iixll^v/ 

0.04  0.66 

(1%)         (28%) 


(10%) 


BIRD  ISLET 
4.05  ha 


0.22  (6%) 

0.41  (10%) 
0.01  (0.03%) 


BROTHERS  ISLET 
4.31  ha 


0.58 

(13%) 


0.37 

(8%) 


0.01 
(0.2%) 


NORTH  PIG  ISLET 

0.97 

5.44  ha 

^ 1 8%) 

1.31      / 

(24%)/ 

l_^-rC\\\v 

Ipttjll 
x\            1 1  ?? 

**X*X"XvX 

•X'XvffiasS©'  \£-*t  /o) 

1.84 
(34%) 

Fig.  29e.     Plant  communities  and  amount  of  indigenous  vegetation  on  motus  0.8  to  25.0  ha.  Caroline  Atoll.  See  Fig.  27  for  explanation  of  the  figure. 

77 


PANDANUS  ISLET 
7.20  ha 


2.30 
(33%) 


2.28 
(32%) 


1.61 
PIG  ISLET  (23%) 

7.25  ha 

0.90 

k(12%) 

'":lpf 
?*.'■&/  1 .35 

(46%)    ^-j-ijg*: 

0.03  (0.4%) 


ARUNDEL  ISLET 
7.34  ha 


4.36 
(59%) 


SHARK  ISLET 
7.98  ha 

2.92 

(37%) 


94(12%) 

0.12(1%) 
2.60(33%)  " 

Fig.  291".      Plant  communities  and  amount  of  indigenous  vegetation  on  motus  0.8  to  25.0  ha,  Caroline  Atoll.  See  Fig.  27  for  explanation  of  the  figure. 

78 


EMERALD  ISLE 
8.34  ha 


3.20 
(38%) 


1.5(18%) 


1  (8%) 


TRIDACNA  ISLET 
9.08  ha 


7.97 
(88%) 


0.18(2%) 
10.21  (2%) 

f  0.72  (8%) 


11 
(100%) 


WINDWARD  ISLET 
1 1 .42  ha 
5.7 
(50%) 


2.97 
(26%) 


1.6 
(14%) 


11 
(100%) 


MOTU  MANNIKIBA 
21.49  ha 

15.69 
(73%) 


1  (8%) 


2.60 

(12%) 

f  2.04(10%) 

0.03(0.1%) 
1.13(5%) 


Fig.  29g.     Plant  communities  and  amount  of  indigenous  vegetation  on  motus  0.8  to  25.0  ha,  Caroline  Atoll.  See  Fig.  27  for  explanation  of  the  figure. 

79 


LONG  ISLAND 
75.90  ha 


32.2 

(42%) 


18.6(25%) 


SOUTH  ISLAND 
104.60  ha 


80.8    ' 
(77%) 


4.2  (4%) 
1.1  (1%) 

13.6(13%) 
gllf  4.9(5%) 


1  (5%) 


NAKE  ISLAND 

91.71  ha 

^^^      18.3 

30.65    / 

J'.W(20°o) 

(33%)  / 

KjIvXvX 

||W6.8(7°o) 

\jx:x:x 

;x3^  3.38  (4%) 

20.8^ 

£3=^6.03  (7%) 

(23%) 

5.75 

(6%) 


Fig    Kl.  Plant  communities  and  amount  of  indigenous  vegetation  on  motus  over  25.0  ha.  See  Fig.  27  for  explanation  ol  the  figure. 

80 


_l        2 

a 

O 


=>     20  - 


O 

2 


O 


I 

1    1 

11          1   1 

he 

II 

^         1 

_  1 

~\   r^ 

1      1 

- 

■ 
■ 

" 

■   ■ 
■    ■       ■    ■               * 

■ 

" 

■  ■ 

■  ■  ■          •     X        ■ 

■  ■■         ■ 

■ 

" 

■ 
■                      ■ 

■  ■                            ■ 

- 

■ 

■      ■             ■ 

* 

■      ■ 

- 

•  • 

• 

- 

• 

•             • 

•                                • 

•                   • 

• 
*• 
•  •                   •     • 
*        ••  •  •          • 
•  •        • 

• 

* 

• 

1 

• 
1 

J. 

' 

0 

0   01 


AREA    OF    MOTU     (  HA ) 


Fig.  3 1 .  Total  numbers  of  plant  communities  ( upper  graph )  and  species  ( lower  graph )  in  relation  to  islet  area,  demonstrating  plant  succession  on  the  differentsized 
islets  encircling  Caroline's  lagoon.  Roman  numerals  refer  to  size  classes  of  the  motus:  I  =  <  0.2  ha,  II  =  0.2  to  0.7  ha,  III  =  0.8  to  25.0  ha, 
IV  =  >  25.0  ha.  The  break  between  II  and  III  marks  a  substantial  increase  in  the  diversity,  area  coverage,  and  height  of  the  forest  ecosystems.  Data  is 
based  on  Table  5. 


22 


20   . 


18 


o 


16 


12 


10 


a        8 

O 

z 

<         6 

O 


50  100 


200 


300 


400 


500 


600 


700 


800 


WIDTH      OF     MOTU     (m) 

Fig.  32.  Maximum  heights  of  Pisonia  forests  in  relation  to  width  of  the  motus.  Stars  represent  forests  with  90-100%  canopy  cover;  dots  represent  forest  or  scrub 
with  less  than  90%  cover. 


81 


20    . 


16   . 


I         12  - 

O 


I  10 


< 
u 


2   . 


AREA      OF       MOTU       (HA) 

Fig.  33.  Maximum  canopy  heights  of  Pisonia  forests  in  relation  to  islet  area.  Stars  represent  forests  with  90-100<7r  canopy  cover;  dots  represent  forest  or  scrub 
with  less  than  909c  cover. 


LAGOON 


HERB 
l_MAT      I 

I        I        TOURNEFORT 


IA  SCRUB 


llo3m) 


|TOURNEFORTIA 
SCRUB 
Itournefortia  FORESTI      |,o5ml 

to9m 


Itou 
est! 


HERB 

MAT 

I 


WIND 


OCEAN 
REEF   FLATS 


^i  is^^^^i  jfisg  la^^SaiaMfeaga  gals  gfesge  SassS 


^ 


fJjTJj    COBAL   RUBBLE 
COARSE    SAND 


-*  y*       S        RED    FOOTED 


GREAT    FRlGATEBIRO 


WHITE     TERN 


REEF    HERON 


% 


LACK     NODDY 


BROWN     NQDOr 


BRISTLE  -TMIGHED  CURLEW 


POL  TNE  SIAN    HAT 


i  i       i   S.  hematic  profile  through  Arundel  Kiel,  recovering  from  disturbance  over  60  years  ago,  showing  natural  herb  mats,  Tournefortia  scrub  and  forest,  and 
five  species  of  breeding  seabirds.  Vertical  height  is  exaggerated, 


WIND 


TOURNEFORTIA 

forestt — 


PISONIA     FORESTliolSml 


Itournefortia     HERB 

"-|  SCRUB  |  MAT    | 


OCEAN 
REEF   FLATS 


OL  VNESIAN    RAT 


Fig.  35.  Schematic  profile  through  Long  Island.  Tr.  O.  Although  Long  Island  has  been  formed  in  the  recent  past  by  a  merger  of  five  smaller  islets,  this  section 
of  the  islet  is  very  mature,  containing  natural  herb  mats,  Toumefortia  scrub  and  forest,  and  tall  Pisonia  forest.  Seven  species  of  seabirds  breed.  Vertical 
height  is  exaggerated. 


oc 

REE 


iCEAN        |_HERb[tOURNEFORTIA 
F  FLATS       I  MAT!       FOREST 


WIND 


SOUTH    ISLAND. 
TRANSECT    2 


DYING   COCOS-IPOMOEA  FOREST 
(to  18m) 


BEACH  SCRUB 
COCOS        |WITH  SURJANAItoSm 

— Lag6on 


plantation!  f 

(  to  21m) 


I  n  j  —  l^sSg&k  .»■">& 


J — i 


EgJsSfl      CORAL    RUBBLE 
FINE    SAND 
HUMUS. GUANO. RUBBLE 


BROWN     "    ■;■!■" 


H   „ 


SHOREBIRDS 


REEF    HERON 


1  BRISTLE  -THlGHED  CURLEW  ^^S        LON 


!«t^^H         POLVN 


ESIAN    R«T 


COCONUT  CRAB 


G  ■  TAILED  CUCKOO 


Fig.  36.  Schematic  profile  through  South  Island,  where  77%  of  the  land  surface  is  covered  with  Cocos  forests,  primarily  in  a  dying  state.   Vertical  height  is 


exaggerated. 


83 


Pg^j    RUBBLE 
fm    HERB   MAT 
i        1    COROIA 

H     TOURNEFORTtA 
W3    PISONIA 

I 1    COCOS 

|..»|    PANDANUS 
IV    |    MIXED 

BEACHROCK 


i 


Fig.  37.  Nake  Island:  vegetation  and  physiography. 


PLANT    COMMUNITY 


PLAHT  SPEC 

ES 

Bo«i*i»via  ••p«»* 

C.co.  »ur,..-. 

Coiltil    luttnidlll 

.■v* 

i»nw>n«»    nt«e'««l« 

- 

'.:,.     »r..     *,»,, 


SUBSTRATES 

ma—  udo  •  •-*•  -  -.1 

Mumul    )„)■«   rubblf 


g^3  RUBBLE 

j^P  HERB  MAT 

f        "|  TOURNEFORTIA 

m  PISONIA 

[^j  COROIA 

F*Tj  COCOS 

^s^—  BEACHROCK 


LONG    ISLAND 


Fig.  38.  Long  Island:   vegetation  and  physiography. 


AHCIBM1   r.H»NN(  i 

o 

Oifi  CHANMII 

1 

«,      ,  „,         ■  -,BW      ,,  • 

* 

II»r«tt  0<   miMI  b  U 

1. 1    * 

01 ■ I AMC  I    l»| 


I  ig    (9.  Long  Island:  north-south  transect  showing  division  into  former  islets,  floristic  composition,  relative  abundance  of  plant  species,  degreeofspeciesoverlap, 
and  canopy  heiehts.  Vertical  heighl  is  exaggerated.  The  exact  locations  oi  the  formerly  more  extensive  Cocos  plantations  are  unknown 

84 


Tournefortia-  Piaonla 


Tournaforlla  rubbli 


Boerhavla   repens 

Cocos  nuclf era 

Cordia  subcordata 

H  eliot  ropiuni    anomalum 

Lepturus     repens 

Morlnda    citrifolla 

Phymatosorus  scolopendrli 

Pisonla  grandis 
Portulaca  lutea 
Tournefortia    argantea 


I    20 


O    10 

z 
< 
o 

I 

LAGOON 

[laal 


100  200 

TRANSECT    WIDTH    Iml 


OCEAN 

I  windward  I 


Fig.  40.  Long  Island:  east-west  cross-section  through  Tr.  C,  a  former  inter-islet  channel,  showing  floristic  composition,  relative  abundance  of  plant  species,  degree 
of  species  overlap,  and  canopy  heights.  Vertical  height  is  exaggerated. 


Opan  Tournafortla    Scrub 


Flats    sand.rubble  rubble 


Boerhavla  repens 
Cocos  nucifera 
Hehotropium  anomalum 
Laportea  ruderalis 
Lepturus   repens 
Phymatosorus  scolopendria 
Portulaca    lutea 
Suriana   maritima 
Tournefortia   argentea 


I 

a 


oio  . 


LAGOON 

laa  ■ 


100  200 

TRANSECT      WIDTH     |m| 


1 

_ 

1 

1 

— 

1 

1 E= 

1 

I 

1 

1 

1 

300 


OCEAN 
Iwlndward  I 


Fig.  41.  Long  Island:  east-west  cross-section  through  Tr.  8.  which  passes  through  mature  interior  Pisonia  forest  of  largest  of  Long's  coalesced  motus.  Data 
includes  floristic  composition,  relative  abundance  of  plant  species,  degree  of  species  overlap,  and  canopy  heights.  Vertical  height  is  exaggerated.  Note 
the  absence  of  low  vegetation  on  the  leeward  shore. 

85 


Fig.  42.  Vegetation  and  physiography  of  Windward  Islet  no.  1:   Bo'sun  Bird  Islet.  Scale  is  larger  than  on  the  vegetation  maps  of  other  islets. 


RUBBLE 
HERB  MAT 


FTT^     RUBBLE 

^M     HERB  MAT 
fl     CORD. A 

"1     TOURNEFORTIA 
Hi     "'SONIA 

~1    TOURNEFORTIA  -CORDIA 


WINDWARD     ISLET 


CRESCENT     ISLET 


MOTU    ATIBU 


'J     ) 


L 


l  ig  l !  Vegetation  and  physiography  of  Windward  Islets  nos.  2,  '  and  4: 
Windward  and  Crescent  Islets,  and  Mom  Atihu  ("Coral  Rubble 
Kiel").  Atibu  appears  to  have  been  severel)  damaged  during  the 
February  1990  storm. 


\        CH  con°" 

Y  |  |  TOURNEFORTIA 

P^l  PISONIA 

|     .     |  COCOS 

I     •      I  SURIANA 


NORTH    PIG    ISLET 


SKULL    ISLET 


NORTH  BROTHERS 
ISLET 


BROTHERS  ISLET 


Fig  44.  Vegetation  and  physiography  of  Windward  Islets  nos.  5  through  9: 
North  Pig,  Pig.  Skull.  North  Brothers,  and  Brothers  Islets,  Note  the 
reels  extending  westward  into  the  lagoon. 


86 


Tournetortia  Pisonia  Tournelortla    Herb  Mat 


Achyranthes  canescens 
Boerhavia  repens 
Heliotropium  anomalum 

Ipomoea   macrantha 
Morinda    citrifolia 

Pisonia  grandis 

Phymatosorus   scolopendria 

Portulaca  lutea 
Tournetortia    argentea 


x 
a 


z 
< 
u 


30  _ 


20  - 


10  - 


LAGOON 
Heel 


100 

TRANSECT    WIDTH   Iml 


200 

OCEAN 
I  windward 


Fig.  45.  Pig  Islet:  east- west  cross-section  through  center  of  islet.  Dataincludes  floristic  composition,  relative  abundance  of  plant  species,  degree  of  species  overlap 
and  canopy  heights.  Vertical  height  is  exaggerated.  Pig's  profile  is  especially  symmetrical.  It  is  remarkable  that  this  islet  was  totally  felled  for  coconuts 
in  1920. 


Boerhavia    repens 
Cocos  nuci  tera 
Heliotropium    anomalum 
Laportea    ruderalis 
Lepturus    repens 
Morinda   citrifolia 
Pisonia   grandis 
Portulaca    lutea 
Sun  ana   maritima 
Tournetortia  argentea 


LAGOON 
Heel 


100 

TRANSECT      WIDTH Iml 


200 

OCEAN 

I  windward  I 


Fig.  46.  Brothers  Islet:  east-west  cross-section  through  center  of  islet.  Data  includes  floristic  composition,  relative  abundance  of  plant  species,  degree  of  species 
overlap  and  canopy  heights.  Vertical  height  is  exaggerated.  Note  the  central  monotypic  stand  of  Pisonia  forest.  This  islet's  forests  were  totally  felled 
in  1920.  o7 


f£23  rubble 

f^^  HERB  MAT 

|  )  TOURNEFORTIA 

|^9  P'SONIA 

n~l  cocos 


Acropora  -  Tndacna 


H«*f  ^/ 


gy^]  RUBBLE 

^|  HERB   MAT 

|         )  TOURNEFORTIA    MORINOA 

|»    «)  SURIANA 


Acropora  -  Tndacna 
Raaft 


<V 


TRIOACNA     ISLET 

I I I U 


Fig.  47.  Vegetation  and  physiography  of  Windward  Islets  nos.  10  through  12:  Fig.  48.  Vegetation  and  physiography  of  Windward  Islet  no.  13:    Tridacna 

Noddy  Rock.  North  Arundel,  and  Arundel.  See  text  for  explanation  of  Islet.  The  best  quality  Acropora-Tridacna  reels  extend  clear  across 

the  relatively  small  amount  of  Pisonia  cover  (Description  and  Ecology  the  lagoon  from  this  motu.  See  Desc.  and  Ecol.  of  the  Motus  Section 

of  the  Motus  Section).  for  explanation  of  unusual  forest  cover. 


Tour  net  or  t  la 


Tournefortia 

Morinda  Tournefortia    Herb  mat 


Boerhavia    repens 
Heliotropium    anomalum 
Laportea    ruderalis 
Lepturus    repens 
Morinda    ci t ri folia 
Phymatosor  us  scolopendria 
Pisonia    grandls 
Portulaca    lutea 
Tournefortia     argentea 


O 

x 


10  - 


o 
z 
< 
o 

0 

LAGOON 


100 

TRANSECT    WIDTH    Iml 


1        1 

1 

1 

1= 

1 
1 

1 

■  ' 

200 

OCEAN 
I  wl  ndward  I 


1  i:  l'i  1  ridacna  Islet:  cist  west  cross-section  through  lower  center  of  motu.  Data  includes  Holistic  composition,  relative  abundance  of  plain  species,  degree 
ol  species  overlap  and  canopy  heights.  Vertical  height  is  exaggerated  Note  the  absence  of  well-developed  interior  forests,  unusual  for  a  motu  of  this 
si/e  (Description  and  Kcologv  of  the  Motus  Section) 

88 


g£3  RUBBLE 

^B  KERB   MAT 

|         |  TOURNEFORTIA 

\TT^  COCOS 

P     7J  DYING   COCOS    IPOMOEA 

|  *  «J  SURIANA 

1"»^  PANDANUS 

~Z^~  BEACHROCK 


Fig.  50.  South  Island:  vegetation  and  physiography.  Note  the  accepted  landing  route  across  its  leeward  reef  flats. 


E   • 

OuUr  B«iCh  Scrub  X  * 

r 


Boerhavirt    repens 
Cocos  nucltera 
He  1 1 ol '  opium    anomalum 
Ipomoea  macrantha 
Lapor  tea  ruder  alls 

Lepturus  repens 
Monnda   citrtfolia 

Phymalosorus  scolopendria 

Pisoma  grandls 

portulaca  lutea 

Sur  lana    man  t  ima 

Tournefortia   argentea 


LAGOON 
( lee ) 


240  360 

TRANSECT    WIDTH (m) 


720 

OCEAN 
(pari   windiwcrd  ) 


Fig.  5 1 .  South  Island:  distribution  and  abundance  of  plant  species  along  Tr.  2,  which  runs  at  an  angle  of  60°  from  the  lagoon  to  the  south  shore  through  the  western 
center  of  the  islet.  Data  includes  floristic  composition,  relative  abundance  of  plant  species,  degree  of  species  overlap  and  canopy  heights.  Vertical  height 
is  exaggerated.  Horizontal  scale  is  half  that  of  the  profiles  from  smaller  motus. 

89 


fTTj  BUBBLE 

|^  HERB    MAT 

"2  TOUHNEFOHT 

J  COHOIA 

[*"3  PISONIA 

|»1^  PANDANUS 

f~r*1  cocos 

PANDANUS     ISLET 


t£J.:'I  RUBBLE 

|B  MERB  MAT 

I  1  TOURNEFORTIA 

rT*^  PISONIA 

!•  •  -1  cocos 

^  BEACMROCK 


Fig.  52.  Vegetation  and  physiography  of  the  7  South  Nake  Islets:  Pandanus, 

Danger,  Booby,  Coral,  and  Lone  Palm  Islets,  MotuKota(  "Red-footed         Fig.  53.  Vegetation  and  physiography  of  Central  Leeward  Islet  no.  1:   Motu 


Booby  Islet"),  and  Motu  Mouakena  ("Masked  Booby  Islet"). 


Mannikiba  ("Seabird  Islet"). 


)"3  RUBBLE 

|  HERB   MAT 

[  )  TOURNEFORTIA 

1       .J  PISONIA 

^■■^  PANDANUS    TOURNEFORTIA 

\:  :'■:  I  coroia 

|"  •  -1  cocos 


C3  RUBBLE 

■  HERB  MAT 

|         1  TOURNEFORTIA 

003  CORDIA 

[■  •  «1  COCOS 

!■»■!  PANDANUS 

[~3  PISONIA 

r~7~|  SURIANA 


•  Urt  400 


i  i       I   Vegetation  and  physiography  ol  the  Central  1  eeward  Islets  nos   2       Fig.  55  Vegetation  and  physiography  of  the  Central  Leeward  Islets  nos.  5 

through  4:    Blackfm  Met.  Mom  Matawa  ("Fair}  Tern  Met"),  and  through  11:    Shark  and  Scarlet  Crab  Islets,  Motu  Nautonga  ("Sea 

Emerald  Isle  Cucumber  Islet"),  Azure  Isle,  Reef-flat,  Bud  and  Fishball  Islets 

90 


Achyranthas  canascana 

Bonhivia    rep«ns 
He  I  iot  r  opium    anomalum 
L  aportea  rudaralis 
Lepturus  repans 
Morinda   citrif olia 
Portulaca    lutaa 
Tournafortia  argantaa 


Hi 



■ 

_                 i 

E 

h- 

a 

X 

ho 

z 
< 
a 

■ 
■ 

J i    — —  —i— A 1 

0 

OCEAN 


50 


100 


TRANSECT    WIDTH  ( m  ) 


LAGOON 
Iwtftdward  I 


Fig.  56.  Fishball  Islet  (no.  1 1.  Centra]  Leewards):  east-west  cross-section  through  the  center  of  this  young  motu,  which  exhibits  early  stages  of  geological  and 
biological  evolution.  Data  includes  floristic  composition,  relative  abundance  of  plant  species,  degree  of  species  merlap  and  canopy  heights.  Vertical 
height  is  exaggerated. 


f-j,;^  BUBBLE 

Q^|  HERB    MAT 

~]  TOURNEFORTIA 

r~~i  cordia 

"2  PISONIA 

[.  .  .|  cocos 

|~j~|  HOUSE   SITE 

[    ■     |  PANDANUS 

,  |     •     |  SURIANA 


MOTU   RAURAU 


MOTU    E1TEI 


PISONIA     ISLET 


MOTU    KIMOA 


MOTU  ANA    ANA 


N 

i 


SOUTHERN    LEEWARD    ISLETS 


Fig.  57.  Vegetation  and  physiography  of  the  5  Southern  Leeward  Islets:  Motus  Raurau  ("Blue-gray  Noddy  Islet").  Eitei  ( "Frigaiebird  Islet").  Pisonia  Islet.  Kimoa 
("Rat  Islet"),  and  Ana-Ana  ("Anne's  Islet"). 


_  lb 

PI.  1 .      A  dawn  view  of  Caroline  as  seen  from  the  ocean  in  1 988  but  virtually  identical  with  that  seen  by  the  atoll's  Western  "discoverer.' 
de  Quiros,  in  1606. 


PI.  2a.    A  clearing  on  South  Island  from  which  the  Solar  Eclipse  Party  made  their  observations  in  1 KX3.  Today  the  area  is  covered  with 
dense  Cocos  forest  (from  Holden  &  Qualtrough,  1884). 


93 


PI.  2b.    One  of  the  three  European-style  houses  that  have  ever  been  built  on  Caroline,  drawn  in  1883  (ibid.). 


■■■■  " 


PI.  3a.    An  artists  very  lice  rendering  of  Caroline  In  1883  (from  Holden  &  Qualtrouith.  18841. 


94 


I.IIUIIl'  MHI.l   .'I    llll    SOI'TBRR*   Wll   <>»   <  AKfU.IM.  iKLisrm 


a 


..<•<" 


V 


7^. 


,%  *: 


j  «*  ** 


*     * 


tif  ;.■■■!.. r        *tt'i. 


PI.  3b.    Map  of  the  "settlement"  on  South  Island,  as  drawn  by  the  Solar 
Eclipse  Party  (ibid.). 


■B3* 


.  4.  Two  lagoon  views  a  century  ago  along  the  north  coast  of  South 
Island  (from  Holden  &  Qualtrough.  1884).  Compare  these 
drawings  with  Plate  24. 


95 


PI.  5a.b.  Motu  Ana-Ana,  unnamed  in  1883  (Holden  &  Qualirough, 
1884)  but  appearing  virtually  identical  then  and  today 
( Plate  8 1 ).  Below  is  a  substantial  Tournefortia  tree  along  South 
Island's  lagoon  edge. 


PI.  6.      Base  camp,  northwest  peninsula.  South  Island. 


46 


* 


PI.  7.      The  junior  author  beside  an  entangling  thicket  of  Ipomoea 
macrantha,  dying  Cocos-Ipomoeaforest,  interior  South  Island. 


97 


PI.  9.      Relocating  camps  with  inflatable  canoe.  Cameron  Kepler  and  Katino  Teeb'aki,  Bo'sun  Bird  Islet. 


PI.  10.    BI.Kk  tippped  reel  shark  [Carcharhinus  melanopterus),  a  numerous  and  aggressive  denizen  "l  Caroline's  lagoon.    Note  the 
abundant  set  cucumbers  i  /  udwigolhuria  sp. ). 


98 


PI.  11.    Jagged,  upraised  reef  ifeo  or  champignon),  leeward  reef,  southwest  Nake  Island.  Note  the  wide  reef  Hats. 


PI.  12.    Floating  a  small  boat  across  the  soutwest  reef  Hats  in  calm  weather  from  the  "boat  entrance"  to  the  "landi 
the  wide  reef  flats.  The  Akademik  Korolev  drifts  offshore. 


'  on  South  Island.  Note 


99 


4fefe 


PI,  1 3.     Beach  crest,  sand)  rubble,  seaward  moat,  and  narrow  reef  flats  off  northeast  Long  Island. 


PI.  14     I  Ktensive  lagoon  reef  flats  south  of  Arundel  Island  on  the  windward  side.  Note  the  Five  southern  leeward  islets  in  the  distance. 


100 


PI.  15.    An  incipient  motu.  barely  connected  to  Motu  Mouakena's  southern  shore.  See  also  Fig.  69. 


PI.  16.    Windward  reel  and  peaked  beach  crest  on  South  Island,  with  the  recently  wrecked  remains  of  a  26-foot  sloop. 


I 


;.-^> 


PI.  17.     S 


Successive  ridges  of  coral  rubble  forming  extensive  gravel  flats,  northeast  Nake  Island. 


■ 


PI.  18.    Channel  between  the  two  northern  islets.  Long  and  Nake.   Note  the  mixed  forest  with  Coi  os  and  Pandanus. 


102 


PI.  19.    Noddy  Rock  (0.02  ha),  an  emergent  reef  platform  along  the  windward  reef  flats.   A  northward  view. 


PI.  20.    Windward  beach.  Long  Island,  showing  wide  rubble  flats  inland  of  the  beach  crest,  rimmed  by  oceanic  flotsam  and  jetsam. 


103 


Beachrock,  wesi  shore.  South  Island 
blinding  coral  beach. 


Russian  vessel  Akademik  Korolev  drifts  offshore 


PI.  22.    A  large  coconut  crab  (Birgus  (afro)  shelters  in  a  subterranean  cavit)  in  the  ft 


104 


.. 


PI  23.    Sand>  Inlet,  a  filled-in  portion  of  the  lagoon,  extends  its  fishhook-shaped  mudflat  300  m  northward  into  Nake's  landmass.  Here 
grow  the  healthiest  and  most  productive  Cocos  on  Caroline.  Note  the  bristle-thighed  curlews  in  the  foreground. 


PI.  24.    South  Island's  pure  ( '.><  OS  plantation,  looking  west  along  the  lagoon.  This  extensive  grove  has  now  obliterated  all  traces  of  the 
former  "settlement"  (Plates  2-5). 


105 


PI.  25.    Brilliantly-colored,  crystalline  lagoon  waters  adjacent  to  Emerald  Isle  (Central  Leeward  Islets)  are  studded  with  twisted  reef 
configurations  and  sandy  channels. 


-.« •   -. 


- 


■ 


PI.  26.    An  impressive  cross  lagoon  reel  ol  Acropora  sp.  coral  and  Tridacna  maxima  clam  shells  joins  Tridacna  Islet  with  Motu  Kimoa. 


106 


PI.  27.    Cordia  forest  (to  1 2.6  m  tall ),  Pig  Islet. 


PI.  28.    Sand,  silt,  rubble,  and  hardpan  mingle  on  the  upper 
reaches  of  Long  Island  adjacent  to  the  lagoon. 


PI.  29.    Caroline's  best  sandy  beach  lines  the  lagoon  shore  of  Shark  Islet.  The  fine  sand  is  overlain  with  sparkling  pink  granuli 


J29[tee^4fe^i 


I 'I    JO     Sheltered  baj   Brothers  Islel    Raurau  Islet  lies  across  the  lagoon.  Note  the  sparse  herb  mat  and  silt]  shallow  waters 


108 


PI.  31.    Narrow  lagoon  beach  lined  with  Tournefortia  scrub.  Blackfin  Islet  (Central  Leewards). 


PI.  32.    Recent  sand  additions  to  South  Island's  northeast  point,  which  is  in  part  covered  with  excellent  natural  herb  mats  and  healthy 
Suriana  scrub  (right). 


109 


PI.  33.    An  old  interislet  channel  (Transect  C,  Long  Island),  now  filling  in  with  herbs,  Toumefortia  scrub,  and  Cocas.  Note  the  nesting 
masked  boobies  in  middle  right. 


1 


&*' 


^ 


T$ 


PI.  34.    A  large  clearing  within  dying  (  o<  05  /pom 
Phymatosorus  and  Ipomoea 


st,  interior  South  Island.  Note  the 


»     v  vi   «%Bk... 


prolific  mats  of  Boerhavia  interlaced  wuh 


110 


PI.  35.    Pandanus  forest,  south  Nake. 


if  A  *  'j- 


PI.  37.    Mixed  fores!  \uth  Cocos,  southwest  Nake  Island. 


7   .-»  - 


i'l    *s     Orange,  scarlet,  and  green  phalanges  of  Paw/anus  rest  on  a  clump  ol  Portulat  a.  The  ubiquitous  Coenobitaperlatus  forage  on  their 
siriui;\  flesh. 


PI.  39.    Inner  edge  of  lagoon.  South  Island,  1988.  Cocos  is  progressively  shading  out  the  beach  scrub  with  Suriana  maritima. 


PI.  40.    Inner  edge  of  lagoon.  South  Island,  1965,  taken  from  approximately  the  same  location  as  Plate  39.  Note  the  greater  extent  of  sand 
and  Suriana  coverage  above  high  water  than  today,  due  to  less  encroachment  and  shading  by  the  palms. 


113 


PI.  41.    Heavy  understory  of  Achyranthes  canescens,  Boerhavia  repens,  and  Phymatosorus  scolopendria  in  a  clearing  adjacent  to  Pisonia 
forest.  Pic  Islet. 


I'l  42.    Boerhavia  Fruits  on  feathers  and  hill  of  a  groat  frigatebird. 


114 


PI.  43.  Inside  a  mature  Pisonia  grandis  forest,  interior  Nake  Island.  Note 
the  barren,  dark  aspect,  virtually  devoid  of  undergrowth  except 
root  suckers. 


*7  PI.  44.    Fringe  of  Suriana,  northeast  point.  South  Island. 


L^MflA* 


_ 


PI.  45.    Well  developed  natural  herb  mat.  primarily  Heliotropium  anomalum  and  Lepturus  repens.    Seattered  Tournefortia  form 
"savannah."   Here  the  sandy  soils  are  conducive  to  the  growth  of  lush  Heliotropium,  northeast  point.  South  Island. 


PI.  4ft.    Detail  ol  Heliotropium  anomalum,  with  remains  of  the  first  evidence  of  tropicbirds  on  Caroline.  Skull  Islet. 


116 


V 


! 


PI.  47.  Toumefortia  scrub,  fringed  by  a  natural  herb  mat,  and  occupied 
by  a  colony  of  sooty  terns.  An  old  interislet  channel,  northern 
Long  Island.  Note  the  nesting  red-footed  boobies. 


PI.  48.    Toumefortia- Morinda forest,  with nestingbrown  noddies,  interior 
Tridacna  Islet. 


117 


PI.  44.    Skull  Islet  (0.02  ha),  with  brown  nodd)  tems,  looking  east  to  the 

windward  reef. 


PI   50.     Anartistic  impression of&Paihldiiin  prove.  South  Island,  in  1 SS3 
(from  Holder  &  Qualtrough,  ISS4). 


118 


PI.  51.    Red-footed  booby  in  Tournefortia  scrub.  Motu  Raurau. 


PI.  52.    Mature  Pisonia  grandis  canopy  with  incubating  black  noddies  and  a  white  tern.  Pig  Islet.  With  a  canopy  height  of  2 1  m.  this  was 
the  most  majestic  interior  forest  on  the  atoll,  although  it  cannot  be  older  than  65  years. 


19 


Azure  Isle  (Central  Leewards) — an  example  of  a  motu  containing  a  single  Pisonia  tree.  Note  the  narro 
interislet  channel.  View  east  from  Motu  Nautonga.  with  Brothers  Islet  in  the  distance. 


hut  Mill  shark-patrolled. 


PI.  54.    Caroline's  sole  clearing,  with  Tahitian-style  huts.  Motu  Ana-Ana. 


120 


PI.  55.    While  tern  "nest"  balances  precariously  on  the  upper  midrib  of  a  coconut  frond. 


PI.  56.    Average-sized  coconut  crab  iBirgus  lalro)  on  Caroline.  Compare  its  size  with  the  coconut. 


121 


PI.  57.    Piles  of  fibrous  shavings — coconut  crab  sign. 


I 'I  ss     Beachrock  al  the  lower  end  of  Long  Island,  typicallj  found  al  low  water. 


122 


"•      A 


PI.  59.    Sooty  terns  (Colony  A) — approximate^  128,000  pairs  occupy  a  scrubby  swath  of  vegetation  in  the  north-central  portion  of  Long 
Island,  the  location  of  an  old  interislet  channel.  Note  Cocos  on  the  right  and  a  mound  of  Pisonia  at  rear. 


PI.  60.    Windward  Islets  numbers  5-9  (left  to  right):  North  Pig.  Pig.  Skull  (not  visible).  North  Brothers,  and  Brothers. 


123 


PI.  61.    North  Pig  (left)  and  Pig  (right)  Islets:  a  southeaster!}  mow  across  the  coral-studded  lagoon  from  Shark  Islet.  Note  the  exp 
central  Pisonia  forests. 


PI,  62.    Arundel  Islet  (foreground),  looking  south  southwest  across  IYidacna  Islet  toSouth  Island.  Distant  Mom  Ana-  Ana  lies  on  the  right. 


124 


■■     M  matter  ■=^i»'    ■  *  *>■*  r-  nls^%.  «       .  r  *  TV 

PI.  63.    Detail,  Tridacna  maxima  reefs,  lagoonside  of  Tridacna  Islet.  This  dense  aggregation  of  giant  clams  amassed  up  to  80  per  square 
meter. 


PI.  64.    View  of  Pandanus  Islet  (center)  west  down  the  channel  separating  Nake  (right)  and  Long  (left)  Islands. 


125 


.  65.    Danger  Islet  (South  Nake  number  2),  looking  due  west  across  the  shallow  upper  lagoon  from  Long  Island. 


PI.  66.     South  Nake  Islets  numbers  3   6 1  right  to  left):  Booby.  Coral.  Lone  Palm,  and  Kota.  Westerly  view  across  the  shallow  upper  lagoon 
from  Long  Island 


126 


PI.  67.    Lone  Palm  Islet  (South  Nake  number  5):  a  southerly  view  from  the  shallow  tidal  flats  of  Coral  Islet.  Plate  68  provides  a  more 
detailed  view  of  the  lower  part  of  the  chain. 


PI.  68.    South  Nake  Islets  numbers  2-6  (right  to  left):  Danger.  Booby,  Coral,  Lone  Palm,  and  Kota,  from  a  boat.  This  view  shows  better 
detail  of  the  lower  part  of  the  chain  than  Plate  67. 


127 


PI.  69.    Motu  Mouakena  (South  Nake  number  7),  with  its  sandy  cay.  A  westerly  view  from  the  upper  lagoon.  Compare  with  Plate  15. 


PI.  70.    North  end,  Motu  Mannikiba  "Seabird  Islet"  (Central  I  ee wards  number  I ),  showing  mounds  ofPisonia  and  a  closer  Cocos  grove 
Note  coral  "mushroom"  in  laj n 


12S 


j**4MMfl&-        V* 


PI.  71. 


of  Pisonia. 


,  looking  west  along  Transect 


Tournefortia,  then  a  distant  patch 


r  ?>*''• 


■ 


y-VV^ 


s£ 


s:ip;:x£-v 


PI.  72.    Motu  Mannikiba,  looking  west  along  Transect  2.  Low  Tournefortia  scrub  covers  a  coarse,  rubbly  substrate  which  was  probably 
once  an  inter-slet  channel. 


129 


PI.  73.    Blackfin  Islet  (Central  Leewards  number  2)  lies  to  the  left  of  the  ship.  View  west-southwest  from  the  tip  of  Long  Island. 


PI.  74.    A  stunning  "blue  hole"  within  the  lagoon  ofl  the  southwest  point  ol  Emerald  Isle  (Central  Leewards  number 4) 


130 


PI.  75.    Mixed  Pandanus-Tournefortia  fores!,  interior  Emerald  Isle. 


PI.  76.    Emerald  Isle,  looking  west  across  hardpan  and  open  lagoonside 
scrub  to  a  densely  vegetated  interior. 


•>i.' 


131 


PI.  77.    Shark  Islet  (Central  Leewards  number  5):  view  across  crystalline  shallow  waters  to  Caroline's  sole  sandy  beach. 


PI.  78. 


Southern  I  eeward  Islets  numbers  I   5  (right  to  left):  motus  Raurau  .mil  Eitei, 
northwest  from  1  ridacna  Islet. 


Pisonia  Islet,  motus  kimoa  and  Ana  Ana    View 


32 


PI.  79.    View  of  Motu  Raurau  ("Blue-gray  Noddy  Islet")  fromMotu  Eitei  ("Frigatebird  Islel"  >.  Note  the  two  nutrient-starved,  chlorotic 
Cordia  trees  growing  in  almost  pure  rubble  (center  left). 


PI.  80. 


View  of  Motu  KimoaC'Ra 
and  Cordia. 


Its  central  forest,  typical  of  the  Southern  I.< 


133 


Motu  Ana-Ana  ("Anne's  Islet"):  a  view  with  giant  ray,  from  the  shallows  of  the  lagoon's  southern  end  adjacent  to  South  Island. 
Note  the  similarity  to  Plate  5,  dating  from  1883. 


L34 


Appendix  1 

Reef  Information  for  Navigators 


We  include  this  section  because  no  accurate  hydrological 
chart  exists,  and  the  Pacific  Islands  Pilot  ( Hy  drographer  of  the 
Navy,  1982)  section  for  Caroline  is  incomplete.  Arundel's 
1883  map  (Admiralty  Chart  No.  979,  Fig.  4)  is  still  used  today. 

Caroline  has  neither  a  deep  pass,  nor  navigable  channels 
into  the  lagoon,  nor  a  ship  anchorage  beyond  the  reef.  In  1 873, 
a  set  of  moorings  was  placed  off  the  west  coast  of  South  Island 
for  the  convenience  of  guano  ships,  approximately  "a  mile 
north  of  the  south-west  point,  in  about  60  fathoms  of  water  and 
some  distance  from  the  shore"  (Maude,  ca.  1942).  These  are 
long  gone,  although  small  boats  can  still  anchor  within  the 
close  lee  of  South  Island  during  normal  trade  winds.  Today's 
ships,  however,  must  drift  well  offshore  after  approaching  the 
atoll  from  the  west  (PI.  12). 

Of  special  note  is  a  possible  extension  of  the  perimeter  reef 
south  and  southwest  of  Caroline.  Arundel's  map  notes:  "Reef 
reported  to  extend  four  cables  from  southeast  point."  This 
information  probably  originated  in  Findlay's  South  Pacific 
Directory  of  1884.  quoted  by  Holden  (1884).  Evidently  the 
windward  reef  of  South  Island  extends  approximately  1.7  km 
from  its  southeast  point.  From  here  "this  reef  sends  out  two 
branches  to  a  distance  of  2.5  km.  one  toward  the  southeast,  the 
other  toward  the  southwest  and  is  consequently  dangerous  to 
approach  at  night."  Arundel's  map  does  not  include  this 
bifurcation  which,  according  to  Findlay  ( 1 884 ).  extends  at  least 
across  the  width  of  South  Island.  He  also  states  that  "a  landing 
(not  always  safe)  may  be  effected  on  the  north  side  of  the 
southwest  bifurcation,  described  above."  No  trace  of  these 
submerged  reefs  is  evident  on  the  RNZAF  aerial  photos. 


The  "boat  entrance"  (Fig.  4).  a  narrow  nick  in  the  outer 
leeward  reef,  marked  by  the  stock  and  ring  of  an  anchor 
and  immediately  to  the  west  of  South  Island's  northwest  point, 
is  not  necessarily  the  easiest  route  to  the  lagoon.  Landing 
is  possible  across  the  steep-to  reef  at  many  locations  along 
the  leeward  reef;  opposite  the  southern  end  of  Ana-Ana  is 
good. 

Landing  is  fairly  straightforward  by  the  anchor  when  the 
seas  are  calm,  especially  when  one  becomes  familiar  with  the 
crooked  notch  that  narrowly  pierces  the  outer  reef.  After 
negotiating  a  powerful  backwash,  one's  boat  is  swept  onto  the 
shallow  reef  flats — liberally  laced  with  chunks  of  jagged 
reef — which  is  exposed  at  low  tide  and  barely  covered  at  high 
tide.  A  swift  current  passes  west  out  of  the  lagoon  between 
South  Island  and  Ana- Ana,  sweeping  over  the  reef  at  the  notch. 
Only  small  craft  with  virtually  no  draft  can  effect  the  500-m 
journey  to  South  Island.  Because  the  shallows  are  unchanneled 
and  not  navigable  even  at  high  tide,  one's  small  boat  must  be 
carefully  hauled  through  the  water  to  a  sheltered  landing  spot 
adjacent  to  South  Island's  northwest  point  (PI.  12). 

An  alternative  landing  method  used  by  yachts  in  calm 
weather  is  via  the  "blind  passage"  (Structure  and  Topography 
section.  Fig.  50).  adjacent  to  the  northeast  corner  of  South 
Island.  Despite  the  fact  that  the  inner  one-third  of  this  narrow 
diverticulum  is  calm  ( and  used  for  the  residents'  yacht  mooring), 
the  outer  two-thirds  are  rough  and  dangerous  most  of  the  time. 
Its  channel  leading  to  and  from  the  open  sea  is  particularly 
turbulent  and  should  not  be  attempted  without  assistance  from 
the  residents,  and  only  at  first  light. 


135 


Appendix  2 

Weather  Data.  Caroline  Atoll.  1989- 1  WO 

A.  Wind  Direction  and  Speed  (mph),  1989 


Jan        Feb          Mar  Apr  May  Jun  Jul  Aug  Sep             Oct  Nov  Dec 

T~         NNE  15    NW  18   E25  E12  E  20            E  15  E  25  E  20  NE  10  N  20  NE  8 

2  NE  10      W5        E  15  E  16  E  20           NE  18  SE  20  E  12  NE  12  N  15-17  NE  10 

Variable 

3  NE  10      NE20    E  12  SE  14  S  15-20      E  18  E  20  SE  25  NE  15  NE  15  NW  20 

4  NE  15       NE  15     E  12  SE  15  E  15            E  15  E  20  SE  20  NE  15  NE  12  NW  20 

5  NE20      NE  15    NE  15  E  12  NE  8          E  15  E  18  E  18  NE  12  E  12  big  NW  18 

swells 


6 

NE20 

NE20 

SE  10 

NE8 

E  15 

E  10 

E  18 

- 

NE  12 

E  10 

N  10 

7 

NE  12 

SE  18 

E  12 

E  14 

NE  10 
E  10 

NE25 

- 

E  12 

- 

NE  15 

NE  12 

NW  18 

8 

NE  12 

E  15 

calm 

SE  1(1 

E  10 

NE20 

SE  12 
squalls 

NE  18 

- 

NE  15 

calm 

NW  18 

9 

NE  12 

E  18 

SE  10 

E20 

E  15 

NE  18 

SE20 

E  12 

- 

NE  12 

N  10 

NE  10 

10 

NE  15 

E  16 

NW  10 

E20 

E  15 

E  15 

SE  16 

E  12 

- 

NE  10 

NE  12 

NE  10 

11 

NE  10 

NE  16 

calm 

SE  25- 

E  10 
squalls 

E  15 

NE  15- 
E  15 

E  15 

calm 

- 

NE  10 

E  18 

NE5 

12 

NE20 

SE  14 

E  10 

W  14 

E  15 

E  15 

E  12 

E  12 

- 

NE  16 

E  17 

NE  12 

13 

NE15 

E  12 

E  12 

E  16 

NE  16 

NE  16 

E  12 

- 

- 

NE  11 

E  14 

NE  12 

14 

NE  15 

E  10 

NE  10-18 

E20 

NE  16 

NE8 

E  12 

calm 

- 

ENE  10 

E  10 

NE  14 

15 

NE15 

NE8 

E8 

E  18 

E  15 

E  10 

E  10 

- 

- 

NE  10 

calm 

NE  14 

16 

NE  15 

SE8 

E  12 

E  18 

E22 
squalls 

E  10 

NE  10 

- 

- 

NE  1.2 

calm 

NE  15 

17 

NE  18 

E20 

NE  15 

E  18 

E25 

E  15 

E  10 

- 

- 

NE  14 

calm 

NE  12 

18 

NE  12 

E  12 

E8 

E  18 

NE  18 

E  15  big 
swells 

E  15 

- 

- 

NE  15 

N 

NE  14 

19 

NE  12 

E  12 

E  10 

E  18 

NE  14 

E  10 

E  16 

- 

- 

NE  13 

NW  10 

E  12 

20 

NE  18 

E  12 

E  10 

E  18 

NE  14 

E  15 

E  18 

- 

- 

E  15 

NW  15 

E  10 

21 

NE  15 

NE  10 

SI    X 

E  14 

E  12 

NE20 

E20 
squalls 

- 

- 

E  16 

N  16 

E  10  big 
swells 

22 

NE20 

E  15 

calm 

E  14 

E  12 

E  10 

E15 

- 

- 

NE  14 

NE  14 

E  12-NE  10 

23 

NE  18 

thundei 

squalls 

N  18 
thunder 

SF.  14 

SE  10 

F  10 

E  15 

- 

NE  20-30 

E20 

NE  16 

calm 

24 

NE  15 

E25  | 
E  15V 

N  12 

SE  14 

SE  10-25 

F  10 

E  12 

- 

E  20-30 

NF  15 

M  i: 

NE  15 

25 

NE  12 

N  12 

E  12 

E  18 

SE  17 

E  10 

- 

E20 

NE  15 

NE  12 

NE  16 

26 

NE  12 

E  15 

N  10 

E  10 

\l    I  1 

E  10 

calm 

- 

E20 

NE  15 

N  10 

\l    I-- 

27 

NE  12 

1   25 

SE  10 

NE  10 

E  18 

E  10 

calm 

- 

NE  17 

E9 

E9 

NF.  L5 

28 

NE  12 

E  14 

i:  12 

E  1  i 

E  18 

E  10 

E  15-35 

- 

E  1 5 

NE  10 

F8 

NE  15 

>9 

NE  15 

E  14 

1.  18  big 
swells 

E  15 

E  18 

E  15 

- 

N  10 

NE8 

E7 

NF  12 

JO 

M    12 

1    I  ! 

1    I  ! 

- 

E  18 

F  15 

- 

calm 

calm 

- 

F  10 

51 

calm 

E  18 

SE  18 

- 

N  20 

E  16 

136 


B.  Rainfall,  1989-1990 


Month/Year          Mean  Monthly        Mean  Number  of 
Rainfall  (mm) Rain  Days 


Jan  "89 

71.1 

7 

•90 

177.8 

22 

Feb  '89 

160.0 

14 

•90 

640.1 

10 

Mar  '89 

259.1 

20 

'90 

215.9 

14 

Apr  '89 

190.5 

16 

'90 

48.3 

6 

May  '89 

66.0 

10 

'90 

325.1 

8 

Jun  '89 

48.3 

11 

'90 

78.7 

11 

Jul '89 

45.7 

12 

'90 

68.6 

8 

Aug  '89 

35.6 

12" 

'90 

109.2 

14 

Sep '89 

50.8 

3" 

'90 

81.3 

6 

Oct  '89 

73.7 

11 

'90 

175.3 

9' 

Nov  '89 

78.7 

7 

'90 

134.6 

14 

Dec  '89 

162.6 

11 

'90 

154.9 

9 

Annual  '89 

1.242.1 

134 

'90 

2.209.8 

131 

Source:  Ron  Falconer,  Caroline  Atoll  (personal  communication). 
■"Based  on  16  days'  data. 
hBased  on  9  days'  data. 
'Based  on  18  days'  data. 


137 


1.2     Ecological  Studies  on  Caroline  Atoll, 

Republic  of  Kiribati,  South-central  Pacific 
Ocean 

Part  2.     Seabirds,  Other  Terrestrial  Animals,  and  Conservation 

CAMERON  B.  KEPLER  .  ANGELA  K.  KEPLER    and  DAVID  H.  ELLIS* 

'  US  Fish  &  Wildlife  Service,  Patuxent  Wildife  Research  Center,  Southeast  Research  Station.  Athens,  Georgia,  USA 
I  S  Fish  &  Wildlife  Service.  Patuxent  Wildlife  Research  Center,  Laurel,  Maryland,  USA 


Introduction 

On  26  July  1988.  the  Soviet  research  vessel  Akademik 
Korolev  sailed  from  Vladivostok  enroute  to  Dutch  Harbor, 
Alaska.  There,  Soviet  oceanographers  joined  their  American 
colleagues  to  invest:gate  the  Gulf  of  Alaska  and  the  Chukchi 
Sea  in  the  Third  Joint  US-USSR  Bering  &  Chukchi  Seas 
Expedition.  When  the  arctic  research  was  completed  in  early 
September,  the  ship  headed  toward  the  central  Pacific.  A 
rendezvous  for  a  second  contingent  of  Americans  took  place  in 
Hilo.  Hawaii,  on  9  September.  Six  Americans  joined  the  ship, 
which  set  sail  on  a  cruise  track  of  14.N42  km  that  terminated 

6  weeks  later  in  Singapore.  An  important  part  of  the  expedition 
was  research  in  and  around  little-known  Caroline  Atoll,  at  the 
southeastern  edge  of  the  Line  Group.  On  Christmas  Island,  we 
picked  up  Katino  Teeb'aki,  a  conservation  officer  for  the 
Republic  of  Kiribati,  who  represented  his  government  and 
helped  our  land-based  research  efforts.  After  landing  on 
Caroline  on  22  September,  we  camped  in  2  locations  for 

7  nights,  surveying  the  terrestrial  plants  and  animals  on  all 
39  islets.  Caroline  is  a  remarkably  pristine  atoll  with  its  native 
plant  communities  nearly  intact  on  all  but  three  islets,  and 
teeming  seabird  communities  that,  collectively,  are  second  in 
the  Line  Group  only  to  Christmas  Island  (Kiribati)  in  diversity. 
For  several  historical  reasons,  the  natural  values  of  this 
spectacular  blend  of  marine  and  terrestrial  resources  have  been 
overlooked. 

Approximately  1,000. 000  seabirds  of  I  I  species  bred  mi 
Caroline  Atoll  in  November  1988.  The  most  abundant  species, 
with  over  900.000  birds  in  1988.  was  the  sooty  tern  (Sterna 
fuscata).  Two  species  (red-tailed  tropicbird  [Phaethon 
rubricauda],  blue-gray  noddy  [Procelsterna  cerulea])  are 
reported  breeding  for  the  first  time.  The  known  seabird  fauna 
now  includes  one  tropicbird.  three  boobies,  two  frigatebirds, 
and  five  terns. 

Seabird  distribution  on  Caroline  is  determined  by  the 
distribution  of  plant  communities,  rats,  coconut  crabs  (Birgus 
latro).  and  the  prevailing  trade  winds.  Red-tailed  tropicbirds 
and  ground-nesting  brown  noddies  (Anous  stolidus)  nested  on 
small  islets  relatively  free  of  rats  and  coconut  crabs,  masked 
and  brown  boobies  (Sula  leucogaster)  preferred  exposed 
windward  beaches,  primarily  on  Long  and  Nake.  The  tree- 
nesting  red-footed  booby  (Sula  sula)  and  the  frigatebirds 


attained  their  highest  nest  densities  in  areas  with  reduced  wind 
speed.  The  black  noddy  (Anous  minutus)  was  found  in  dense 
colonies,  generally  high  in  Pisonia  trees  in  the  center  of  small 
islets,  while  the  uncommon  blue-gray  noddy  (Procelsterna 
cerulea)  nested  solitarily  on  open  coral  rubble.  Sooty  terns 
nested  in  large  colonies,  generally  near  or  under  relatively  open 
Tournefortia  scrub  but  also  in  open  areas  under  Tournefortia 
and  closed-canopy  P/.sy»i/«  forests.  Tree-nesting  brown  noddies 
and  white  terns  (Gygis  alba)  were  found  throughout  the  native 
forests  and  were  the  only  species  that  nested  in  anthropogenic 
forests.  Disturbed  forests  on  South  and  Nake  held  the  lowest 
seabird  population  densities,  and  no  birds  nested  on  inhabited 
Motu  Ana-Ana. 

About  300  bristle-thighed  curlews  {Numenius  tahitiensis). 
a  rare  shorebird,  overwinter  on  Caroline,  foraging  in  all  terrestrial 
habitats,  including  Pisonia  and  Cocos-Ipomoea  forests.  We 
extended  the  known  winter  range  of  the  long-tailed  cuckoo  by 
discovering  a  small  population  on  the  atoll,  the  first  record  for 
the  Southern  Line  Islands. 

The  known  lizard  fauna  was  increased  from  three  to  six 
species.  Approximately  2.200  coconut  crabs  inhabited 
12  islets  on  Caroline.  Although  primarily  associated  with 
coconut  plantations,  we  also  found  them  in  Pisonia  and 
Tournefortia. 

We  now  know  that  the  populations  of  seabirds  and  coconut 
crabs  on  Caroline  Atoll  are  of  national  and  international 
importance.  The  black  noddy  (17,000  birds)  and  white  tern 
(8,000  birds)  populations  are  the  largest  in  the  Republic  of 
Kiribati,  while  the  red-footed  booby  population  (7.000  birds) 
is  the  fifth  largest  in  the  world. 

History  of  Ornithological  Studies 

"There  were  a  great  quantity  of  seabirds  of  several  kinds, 
and  so  importunate  that  they  seemed  to  want  to  attack  the  men" 
(Markham.  1904).  So  wrote  the  Portuguese  explorer deQuiros 
on  21  February  1601,  the  first  European  to  see  Caroline  Atoll. 

Precisely  what  seabirds  were  present  remained  a  mystery 
until  the  island  was  surveyed  364  years  later  by  the  Pacific 
Ocean  Biological  Survey  Program  (POBSP)  (Clapp  &  Sibley, 
1971a).  Prior  to  this  expedition,  accounts  of  the  avifauna  had 
been  incomplete  and  somewhat  confused.  Bennett  (1840) 
described  red-footed  boobies,  a  frigatebird  (species  '.').  white 


139 


terns,  bristle-thighed  curlews,  tattlers  (Heteroscelus  incanum 
and  H.  brevipes),  and  "a  great  number  of  small  pigeons"  with 
white  heads  (certainly  noddy  terns,  perhaps  both  A.  minimis 
and  A.  stolidus).  The  "shoal  birds"  that  greeted  him  were 
probably  sooty  terns.  His  most  unusual  contribution  was 
mention  of  a  possible  flightless  rail:  "The  other  birds  of  the 
coast  were  a  kind  resembling  a  cool..."  (p.  372). 

The  1883  Solar  Eclipse  Party  (Subchapter  1.1.  History  of 
Caroline  Atoll  section)  published  a  few  sketchy  notes,  adding 
lesser  golden-plover  (Pluvialis  dominicd),  reef  heron  (Egretta 
sacra),  and  masked  booby  (Sula  dactylatra)  ("gannet")  to  the 
bird  list.  Of  dubious  identity  were  two  species  of  "seagull"  and 
a  "snipe"  (Dixon.  1884).  Holden.  one  of  the  astronomers, 
heard  "the  notes  of  a  singing  bird."  which  prompted  us  to  add 
mist  nets  to  our  equipment  in  the  hopes  of  capturing  an 
Acrocephalus  warbler.  This  resulted  in  our  discovery  of  the 
long-tailed  cuckoo  (Eudynamistaitensis)  (Ellis  et  al.,  1990)  and 
piqued  our  curiosity  about  what  Holden  might  really  have 
heard. 

The  POBSP  expedition  spent  3  days  on  Caroline  in  June 
1965.  They  found  10  species  of  seabirds  (9  breeders). 
4  migrant  shorebirds,  and  a  reef  heron  (Clapp&  Sibley.  1971a), 
providing  rough  population  estimates  for  each  species.  This 
w  ork  laid  the  foundation  for  later  expeditions.  Brief  visits  to 
Caroline  by  the  Kiribati  government  in  1974  and  Roger  Perry 
in  1977  (Garnett,  1983)  added  no  further  information. 

The  1988  expedition  to  Caroline  was  longer  and  more 
extensive  than  all  former  visits.  We  found  three  new  island 
records:  a  breeding  seabird  ( red-tailed  tropicbird ).  a  shorebird 
(Sanderling  [Crocethiaalba]),  and  a  migratory  land  bird  (long- 
tailed  cuckoo),  and  determined  islet-by-islet  distributions  for 
each  species.  Our  population  estimates,  calculated  from  field 
work,  aerial  photographs,  and  detailed  vegetation  analysis. 
indicate  that  Caroline's  avifauna  is  far  more  important  than  had 
previously  been  suspected  (King,  1973;  Garnett.  1983).  In 
March  and  May  1 990.  the  ICBP  1990  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands 
Expedition  (Subchapter  1.1.  Methods  section)  filled  in  minor 
gaps  in  our  knowledge.  Caroline's  residents  added  another 
breeding  seabird,  the  blue-gray  noddy,  in  summer  1990. 

Methods 


Distribution  and  Habitat  Preference 

We  described  se\  en  major  plant  communities  on  Caroline 
Atoll  (Subchapter  1 . 1  i.  With  the  use  of  aerial  photos  and  the 
transect  data,  we  mapped  the  communities  found  on  each  islet. 
Bird  distribution  was  determined  and  plotted  using  these  islet 
vegetation  maps.  If  a  species  nested  within  a  particular  plant 
community,  it  was  plotted  on  the  distribution  maps  as  occurring 
throughout  that  community  unless  determined  otherwise. 

Population  Sizes  and  Breeding  Phenology 

We  measured  transect  distances  for  each  islet  using  a  hip- 
chain  and  biodegradable  cotton  thread.  We  recorded  all  birds 
seen  within  the  30-m-wide  strips:  transect  width  was  estimated 
visually.  We  assigned  birds  to  one  of  several  mutual  I  v  exclusive 
categories:  adults  present,  adults  on  territory,  adults  on  nests 
(contents  unknown ).  eggs,  naked  chicks,  dow  ny  chicks,  chicks 
w  ith  remiges  erupting,  chicks  with  scapular  feathers,  or  chicks 
in  juvenile  plumage.  We  created  a  range  of  possible  laying 
dates  for  each  egg  and  chick  using  known  growth  parameters 
for  each  species  (Kepler.  1978;  Kepler  &  Kepler.  1978).  This 
enabled  us  not  only  to  estimate  seabird  populations,  but  also  to 
determine  and  plot  a  rough  breeding  phenology  for  each 
species  (Figs.  3.5.7.9.10.12).  In  these  figures,  the  height  of  the 
bar  for  each  category  ("downy,"  "scapulars."  etc.)  represents 
the  number  of  nests  found  or  estimated  with  that  development 
stage  in  September  1988.  The  bar  width  represents  the 
approximate  time  span  over  which  eggs  could  have  been  laid 
to  produce  that  stage,  while  the  "no.  day  s"  is  a  count  back  from 
the  survey  dates  to  accommodate  growth  and  development  that 
had  occurred.  Thus,  while  each  figure  shows  what  breeding 
stages  we  found,  we  extend  those  nests  back  in  time  to  show- 
roughly  when  they  would  have  begun.  The  number  of  clutches 
begun  per  day  is  determined  by  dividing  the  number  of  nests 
per  stage  by  the  time  span  in  days  over  which  those  eggs  were 
laid. 

Sooty  terns  nested  in  dense  colonies.  Each  colon)  was 
mapped,  and  its  total  si/e  (m')  w  as  calculated.  A  minimum  of 
10  plots  (3x3  mor.3  x  6  m).  within  which  all  eggs  and  chicks 
were  counted,  were  randomly  located  along  a  compass  line  in 
each  colony.  The  population  size  of  each  colon)  w  as  estimated 
from  these  plot  densities. 


From  22  2l>  September  I9S8,  C.  B.  Kepler.  A.  K.  Kepler, 
D.  H.  Ellis,  and  K.  Teeb'aki  surveyed  all  of  Caroline's  39  islets 
except  North  Arundel  Islet,  naming  most  of  them  (Fig.  1 ;  see 
Subchapter  1.1,  Methods  section).  We  established  50  linear 
transects,  extending  13,300  x  30  m.  laid  out  to  ensure  that  at 
least  y<  of  each  islet  was  sampled  lor  birds  and  plants  (see 
Subchapter  I.I.  Methods  section  and  Fig.  8).  Sampling  was 
increased  with  19.300  m  of  perimeter  surveys  along  the 
windward  and  leeward  coasts  of  21  islets  (Subchapter  1.1. 
Fig.  9).  On  Noddv  Rock.  Skull.  Atibu.  Bo'sun  Bird.  Coral. 
Reef-flat,  and  Fishball  (Fig.  1).  we  made  total  counts  of  the 
breeding  seabirds.  All  sur\  cv  s  w  ere  conducted  during  daylight 
hours.  Some  incidental  data  have  been  added  from  the  1990 
ICBP  expedition. 


Mist  Nets 

We  operated  4  ATX  4-shelf  36-mm  mesh  mist  nets 


(2.6  x  12  m) 


43.5  net  hours,  according  to  the  following 


schedule:  14.5  net  hours  (daylight)  beneath  a  10-15  m  Cocos 
canopj  on  South.  27.5  net  hours  (day  and  night  i  in  Pisonia- 
Cocos  interface  1 12  m  tall)  near  Tr.  10  on  Long,  and  1.5  net 
hours  m  Pisonia-Tournefortia  within  a 4-6  m  canopj  onTr.4, 

Long.  One  cuckoo  was  collected  (USNM  607 19 1 1. 

Collecting  Other  Vertebrates 

Lizards  that  were  active  and  conspicuous  were  collected  at 
base  camps  on  South  and  Long,  either  bv  hand  or  with  a 
blowgun  firing  steel  darts.  No  attempt  was  made  to  search  lor 
reptiles  under  coral,  litter,  or  in  other  concealed  locations 


140 


Rats  were  collected  with  a  blowgun  or  snap  traps  baited  with 
coconut,  the  former  proving  far  more  effective  because  most 
traps  were  sprung  by  hermit  crabs.  We  preserved  all  specimens 
in  formalin  and  sent  them  to  the  US  National  Museum. 

Seabird  Species  Accounts 

Eleven  species  of  seabirds  occur  at  Caroline,  most  of 
which  breed  in  large  numbers.  They  include  one  tropicbird, 
three  boobies,  two  frigatebirds.  and  five  terns. 

Red-tailed  Tropicbird (Phaethon  rubricauda)  (Figs.  2.3;  PI.  1 ) 

Red-tailed  tropicbirds  breed  at  widely  scattered  locations 
throughout  the  tropical  Pacific  and  Indian  Oceans.  In  the  Line 
Group,  they  nest  from  Palmyra  south  to  Starbuck  ( Perry,  1980), 
with  a  large  population  (8,500  birds)  on  Christmas  Island 
(Clapp,  1967).  Prior  to  our  expedition  it  was  unknown  from 
Caroline,  Vostok,  or  Flint. 

Distribution  and  Habitat  Preference:  Our  first  indication 
that  red-tailed  tropicbirds  nested  on  Caroline  was  the  discovery 
of  the  skull,  tail  feather,  and  broken  egg  ( Subchapter  1 . 1 ,  PI.  46) 
under  a  small  Tournefortia  bush  on  a  previously  unnamed  islet 
between  Pig  and  North  Brothers  Islets.  We  named  this  sparsely 
vegetated  collection  of  rubble  "Skull  Islet"  (Subchapter  1.1. 
pis.  46,49).  We  later  found  47  nests  on  another  islet,  naming 
it  Bo' sun  Bird  (Fig.  1 )  after  the  species'  common  name. 

All  nests  were  located  under  relatively  open  Tournefortia 
scrub  less  than  3  m  tall  in  open,  windy  locations,  with  the 
majority  (91%)  on  small  islets  (0.24-0.86  ha).  All  nests  were 
under  shrubs  with  few  stems  within  a  0.5  m2  nest  space,  and 
most  had  peripheral  cover  on  the  sides  of  the  shrubs,  both 
important  factors  in  nest-site  selection  (Clark  etal.,  1983).  All 
nests  were  in  areas  relatively  free  of  Polynesian  rats  (Rattus 
exulans)  and  coconut  crabs  (Birgus  Ultra):  5  nests  on  Long 
were  within  50  m  of  the  island's  south  point. 

There  are  large  populations  of  Polynesian  rats  and  coconut 
crabs  on  Caroline's  bigger,  more  wooded  islets.  This  rat, 
though  basically  vegetarian,  is  an  effective  seabird  predator 
(Kepler,  1967;  Norman,  1975)  that  in  some  years  has  taken 
65%  of  the  red-tailed  tropicbird  eggs  and  1 00%  of  the  chicks  on 
Kure  Atoll  (Fleet,  1972).  Coconut  crabs  are  also  known  bird 
predators  (Clapp  &  Sibley,  1971a;  Helfman,  1979;  Reese. 
1987).  It  may  be  no  accident  that  tropicbirds  on  Caroline 
are  restricted  to  small,  relatively  open  islets  that  harbor  few,  if 
any.  rats  and  crabs  or  occur  only  on  the  tip  of  Long  Island, 
where  predator  densities  are  low.  We  saw  no  rats  on  Bo'sun 
Bird  Islet.  Although  rats  could  swim  the  1 65  m  to  the  islet,  the 
nearly  continuous  presence  of  black-tipped  reef  sharks 
(Subchapter  1.1.  PI.  10)  in  the  channels  surrounding  the  islet 
provides  protection  to  its  nesting  tropicbirds. 

Numbers:  In  September  1988.  we  found  a  total  of 
56  active  nests  on  5  islets  (Fig.  2,  Table  1)  and  estimated  a 
minimum  population  of  60  pairs.  The  May  1990  expedition 
found  130  nests  on  Bo'sun  Bird:  our  revised  estimate  for 
Caroline  is  approximately  300  birds.  Bo'sun  Bird  Islet  was 
surveyed  by  POBSP  in  June  1965,  and  no  tropicbirds  were 
located  on  the  ground  or  in  the  air  (F.  Sibley,  personal 


communication ).  It  is  unlikely  that  red-tailed  tropicbirds  were 
present  but  overlooked  at  that  time,  suggesting  that  they  have 
colonized  the  atoll  only  recently.  The  Caroline  population  is 
now  the  second  largest  colony  known  from  the  Line  Group,  and 
Caroline  is  only  one  of  five  islands  in  the  archipelago  where 
red-tailed  tropicbirds  are  known  to  breed. 

Phenology:  Of  the  56  nests  found  in  1988,  54  contained 
eggs  or  chicks  (Table  2).  The  33  chicks  were  divided  into  4  age 
classes  (Fleet,  1974;  Diamond,  1975a).  which,  together  with 
the  21  eggs,  provided  an  indication  of  laying  phenology  for 
140  days  prior  to  our  arrival  (Fig.  3).  Eggs  in  surviving  nests 
had  been  laid  at  a  fairly  even  rate  from  early  May  (possibly 
starting  earlier)  through  September.  The  finding  of  only  two 
additional  pairs  on  territory,  and  only  one  courtship  flight, 
indicated  that  laying  was  ending.  On  24  May  1 990.  many  nests 
contained  eggs  and  downy  chicks  (75%  nests  with  chicks),  and 
pairs  were  still  courting. 

On  Christmas  Island,  peak  laying  generally  occurs  from 
June  to  October  ( Schreiber  &  Ashmole.  1 970),  later  than  those 
parts  of  the  1988  and  1990  breeding  seasons  we  observed  on 
Caroline. 

Masked  Booby  (Sula  dactylatra)  (Figs.  4,5;  PI.  2) 

The  masked  booby  is  widely  distributed  in  the  Atlantic, 
Indian,  and  Pacific  Oceans.  Clapp  (1967)  estimated  that 
19,100  masked  boobies  bred  in  the  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands, 
with  about  13,000  of  them  in  the  Line  Islands,  mostly 
(ca.  9,000)  on  Jarvis. 

Distribution  and  Habitat  Preference:  Eighty-four  percent 
of  masked  booby  nests  (159)  were  on  the  windward,  rubbly 
shores  of  Long  and  Nake  Islands,  extending  to  the  north  end  of 
the  atoll.  Fifteen  additional  nests  were  scattered  along  the 
lagoon  edges  of  five  South  Nake  Islets  (Table  1 ).  Nests 
consisted  of  bare  scrapes  with  exposed  sand,  usually  within  a 
sparse  ground  cover  of  Portidaca  and  Heliotropium  (PI.  2). 
Over  half  the  nests  were  amassed  in  one  open  colony  on  Nake 
that  extended  nearly  1,000  m,  beginning  approximately  150  m 
south  of  Tr.  2  and  extending  about  50  m  north  of  Tr.  4 
(Subchapter  1.1,  Fig.  8).  Here  a  nearly  unbroken  Heliotropium 
mat  30-80  m  wide,  with  patches  of  Tournefortia,  occupied  the 
area  between  the  leading  edge  of  the  Tournefortia  scrub  and  the 
beach  crest.  Nests  were  20-30  m  apart  in  the  densest  section 
(nearTr.  3).  All  nests  were  exposed  to  the  sun,  unlike  those  of 
the  brown  boobies.  Some  adults  and  juveniles  roosted  under 
the  scrub;  guano  deposits  indicated  regular  occupancy. 

A  loose  group  of  7  breeding  pairs  was  scattered  on  a  broad 
plain  of  low  herbs  along  a  partially  filled  old  interislet  channel 
370  m  south  of  the  north  end  of  Long  Island  (Tr.  C. 
Subchapter  1.1,  Figs.  8,40).  Four  more  pairs  nested  in  coral 
rubble  along  the  channel  separating  Nake  and  Long,  one  pair 
with  a  downy  young  only  2-3  cm  above  high-tide  flow  on  an 
"islet"  between  fingers  of  the  channel,  a  precarious  location 
where  nesting  surely  must  fail  in  stormy  periods.  No  birds  were 
seen  there  in  March  and  May  1 990,  following  a  severe  storm  in 
February  1990.  Four  pairs  nested  singly  along  a  leeward 
1 ,000-m  stretch  of  lagoon  shore  on  the  northern  end  of  Long 
(Fig.  4);  hardpan  was  the  primary  substrate. 


141 


Numbers:  In  September  1988  we  found  189  masked 
booby  pairs  (Table  3),  including  those  on  territory  (with  or 
without  nest  scrapes)  and  juveniles  (with  or  without  attending 
adults).  We  found  no  "clubs"  of  nonbreeding  birds.  We 
covered  most  of  the  habitat  favored  by  this  species  except  the 
northern  300  m  of  Nake  Island;  in  1990  a  few  scattered  pairs 
nested  there.  Our  population  estimate,  including  pairs  we 
might  have  missed,  was  approximately  200  breeding  pairs. 
The  only  other  population  estimate  was  of  "ca.  10"  birds 
(Clapp&Sibley,  1971a);in  1965  POBSP  biologists  (F.Sibley, 
personal  communication)  surveyed  all  locations  where  we 
found  breeding  pairs.  Thus,  200  pairs  represents  a  major 
increase  in  the  population  on  Caroline  Atoll. 

Phenology:  In  June  1965  only  four  masked  booby  nests 
containing  eggs  were  found  ( Clapp  &  Sibley,  1971a).  indicating 
that  nesting  began  in  May  or  June.  We  found  nests  in  all  stages 
in  September  1988  (Table  3.  Fig.  5 1.  The  large  age  class  in 
April  may  include  some  juveniles  that  could  fly  ( i.e..  were  older 
than  1 80  days).  We  may  have  undercounted  naked  chicks,  not 
wishing  to  expose  them  to  the  sun  by  frightening  the  brooding 
adult.  Laying  began  in  April  or  earlier,  peaked  in  June  and  July 
(Fig.  5).  and  continued  until  our  survey  in  late  September.  The 
34  pairs  on  territory,  many  with  nest  scrapes  (Table  3 ).  indicated 
that  laying  was  still  in  progress  and  would  continue  into 
October. 

In  March  1 990. 3 1  pairs  were  on  territory  or  were  attending 
nests,  eggs,  or  older  chicks,  indicating  that  a  new  breeding 
season  was  under  way  as  the  previous  season  was  ending.  By 
May  1 990  there  were  63  nests,  mostly  with  eggs,  and  there  were 
no  older  chicks.  Thus,  the  1990  season  augments  the  1988  data 
and  suggests  an  annual  cycle  with  egg  laying  beginning  slowly 
in  lebruary  and  March,  peaking  in  June  and  July ,  and  declining 
to  a  low  ebb  from  December  to  February. 

The  large  number  of  fledgedjuveniles  and  nests  with  older 
chicks,  in  both  September  1988  and  March  1990.  indicated  that 
the  1988  and  1989  breeding  seasons  were  very  successful.  It 
also  suggested  that  potential  predators  (rats  and  coconut  crabs ) 
posed  little  hazard  to  this  hardy  species. 

Brown  Benin  (Sula  leucogaster)  (Fig.  2) 

This  widely-distributed  pantropical  species  has  an 
estimated  population  in  the  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands  of  about 
$,200  (Clapp.  1967;  Perry.  1980).  with  over  half  of  them 
(2.000)  recently  found  on  Maiden  Island,  in  the  Southern  Line 
Group. 

Distribution  and  Habitat  Preference:  Breeding  brown 
boobies  on  Caroline  were  restricted  to  the  w  mdward  edges  of 
Tournefortia  scrub  and  forest,  generally  within  15-20  m  of 
high  water.  In  19SS  we  found  nests  on  four  islets  (Fig.  2, 
Table  I).  Long,  with  12  pairs,  was  the  onlv  islet  supporting 
more  than  a  single  pair.  They  w  ere  located  on  the  northern  two- 
thirds  of  the  island:  four  pairs  formed  a  loose  colony  near  the 
head  of  Tr.  A  ( Subchapter  I.I.  Fig.  Si.  All  nests  were  under 
Tournefortia  bushes  approximately  3  m  tall.  In  March  1990. 
we  found  20  pairs  of  brown  boobies,  all  on  windward  Nake  as 
far  as  (he  islet's  northern  extremity.  There  was  no  evidence  of 
nesting  on  Long  Island.  On  May  22.  1990.  only  three  nests,  all 
with  engs.  were  found  on  Nake. 


On  22  September  1988.  we  saw  2  birds  plunge-div  ing  w  ith 
masked  and  red-footed  boobies  approximately  500  in  west  oi 
South  Island.  On  the  atoll,  flying  brown  boobies  were  observed 
soaring  only  along  the  windward  beaches.  Two  birds  roosted 
on  the  south-central  beach  of  South,  and  another  was  found 
roosting  on  Kota. 

Numbers:  We  counted  1 5  pairs  during  perimeter  surveys 
in  1988,  yet  found  none  on  the  transects.  Since  we  covered 
virtually  all  the  w  indward  beaches  ( Subchapter  1.1.  Fig.  9 1.  we 
are  confident  that  fewer  than  20  pairs  nested  on  the  atoll.  Our 
population  estimate  for  1990  was  25  pairs. 

The  POBSP  (Clapp  &  Sibley,  1 97 1  a)  found  three  nests  on 
Nake  in  June  1965,  estimating  a  population  of  15  birds.  Even 
though  our  surveys  triple  the  known  population,  the  brown 
booby  remains  a  rare  seabird  on  Caroline. 

Phenology:  With  the  exception  of  one  recently 
fledged  juvenile,  all  nests  contained  eggs  in  September  1988 
(Table  3).  Clapp  &  Sibley  (1971a)  found  eggs  in  June  1965. 
In  March  1990,  the  20  pairs  were  all  on  nests  whose  contents 
ranged  from  eggs  to  an  older  juvenile.  However,  only 
2  months  later,  only  three  nests,  containing  eggs,  could  be 
found.  These  data  from  3  years  suggest  that  the  species  may 
have  trouble  rearing  young  on  the  atoll.  More  juveniles  should 
have  been  encountered,  especially  in  May  1990.  Predationby 
Polynesian  rats  or  coconut  crabs  could  limit  reproduction  on 
the  atoll. 

Red-footed  Booby  (Sula  sula)  (Figs.  6.7:  Subchapter   1.1. 
PI.  51) 

This  pantropical  booby  numbers  over  55.000  individuals 
in  the  Line  Group  (Clapp.  1967;  Perry,  1980),  making  it  one  of 
the  most  important  regions  in  the  world  for  this  species. 
Caroline  holds  the  fifth  largest  known  red-footed  booby  colony 
( see  Nelson.  1978).  The  largest  known  colony  ( 140.000  pairs) 
is  found  on  Tower  Island  (Galapagos):  3  of  the  5  biggest 
colonies  occur  in  the  Line  Group. 

Distribution  and  Habitat  Preference:  In  1988,  the  red- 
footed  booby  bred  on  28  islets,  ranging  in  size  from  Nautonga 
(0.34  ha)  to  Nake  (107.46  ha)  (Fig.  6).  On  the  Windward 
Islands,  red-foots  occurred  from  Nake  to  Tridacna.  absent  only 
from  the  smallest  islets  ( Noddy  Rock.  Skull  Islet.  Motu  Atibu ). 
The  species  was  also  widespread  on  the  leeward  islets,  extending 
from  Pandanus  to  Eitei.  The  tiny  islets  (  Fishball,  Azure,  Reef- 
flat)  were  not  occupied. 

Red-foots  are  tree  nesters  w  hose  distribution  on  Caroline 
closely  matched  that  of  Tournefortia  scrub  and  forest 
(Subchapter  1.1.  PI.  51).  Thev  sometimes  utilized  smaller 
Pisonia  or  Cordia  trees  where  thev  intermingled  with 
Tournefortia  and  occasionally  built  nests  in  the  tallest  (>15  mi 
Pisonia.  They  nested  in  smaller  Tournefortia  patches  within 
the  peripheral  scrublands,  especially  those  not  directly  exposed 
(o  the  trade  winds.  They  clearly  av  oided  smaller  islets  because 
of  the  lack  of  suitable  Tournefortia  in  which  to  breed.  Thev 
nested  inward  from  (he  vegetated  edges  of  the  islets,  generally 
at  3-6  m  in  height,  and  were  distributed  in  broken  rings  around 
the  smaller  motus  in  areas  of  moderate  winds.  A  higher 
percentage  of  the  population  occurred  on  perimeter  surveys 
than  on  cross-island  transects. 


142 


Red-foots  were  absent  from  South  Island,  which  was 
primarily  covered  with  Cocos  (Subchapter  1.1,  Figs.  50,51). 
Even  though  Tournefortia  occurred  on  all  its  coastlines,  no 
boobies  nested  in  them.  Ana-Ana  was  also  unoccupied:  the 
presence  of  a  family  of  four  people,  a  cat  (removed  in  1990), 
and  a  dog  undoubtedly  discouraged  nesting  attempts.  Red- 
foots  also  avoided  the  mixed  forests  of  south  Nake,  which 
contained  much  Cocos  and  Pandanus  (Subchapter  1.1, 
Fig.  37 ).  Red-footed  boobies  were  thus  found  only  in  Caroline' s 
indigenous  woodlands,  primarily  in  Tournefortia  >2  m  tall; 
they  avoided  anthropogenic  plant  communities  and  man. 

Red-foots  used  a  wider  range  of  habitats  for  roosting. 
Nonbreeding  birds  were  found  throughout  the  taller  indigenous 
trees,  even  in  leeward  situations  where  Pisonia  and  Cordia 
overhung  the  lagoon  (as  on  Long  Island). 

Numbers:  The POBSP(Clapp& Sibley,  197 la) estimated 
5,000  ±  25%  Red-foots  on  Caroline  in  June  1965,  with  about 
2,000  +  25%  nesting  pairs.  In  1988, we  sampled  systematically 
more  than  7%  of  the  available  habitat  on  all  motus  except 
Crescent  (4.6%  sampled)  and  North  Arundel,  and  estimated 
that  2,22 1  pairs  of  red-footed  boobies  nested  on  27  of  Caroline' s 
islets  (Table  1).  We  found  an  additional  1,234  roosting, 
nonbreeding  birds.  We  know  (Kepler,  1969;  Nelson.  1978) 
that  fewer  boobies  remain  in  their  colonies  during  the  day  than 
at  night.  Thus,  an  unknown  fraction  of  the  population  was  at 
sea  when  we  conducted  our  counts.  Impressive  flights  of  red- 
footed  boobies  returned  each  evening:  3^4  birds  arrived  for 
each  one  that  had  remained  behind,  many  undoubtedly  mates 
of  incubating  birds.  To  approximate  the  number  of  returning 
nonbreeding  birds,  we  doubled  the  number  of  roosting  adults 
to  allow  for  an  additional  1,234  adults  and  juveniles.  Thus,  our 
conservative  estimate  was  at  least  7,000  individuals. 

Because  red-footed  boobies  were  so  dependent  upon 
Tournefortia,  we  determined  the  nesting  population  on  each 
islet  by  multiplying  the  number  of  nests  found  on  transects  by 
the  ratio  of  sampled  to  total  Tournefortia  area.  Perimeter 
counts  (Subchapter  1.1,  Fig.  9)  were  used  if  the  number  of  red- 
foots  observed  exceeded  the  number  calculated  from  the  cross- 
island  transects. 

Long  Island  held  the  greatest  number  of  nests  (659), 
mostly  in  the  leeward  Tournefortia  and  Tournefortia— Pisonia 
edge.  Bird  densities  were  typically  highest  on  the  largest  islets: 
Windward  and  Tridacna,  the  largest  Windward  Islets,  held  163 
and  1 1 1  nests,  respectively;  and  Mannikiba.  the  biggest  leeward 
islet,  harbored  the  largest  population  ( 1 84)  of  the  entire  leeward 
side.  There  were  exceptions,  however:  Pandanus,  with  four 
times  the  area  of  Tournefortia  of  any  of  the  South  Nake  Islets, 
held  fewer  birds  than  three  much  smaller  islets  (Table  1 ). 

Tournefortia  scrub  and  forest  covered  approximately 
125.25  ha  (Subchapter  l.l,Table9).  Overall,  there  were  1.75 
red-footed  booby  nests/ 1 .000  nr  of  Tournefortia  forest.  Nest 
densities  for  occupied  islets  by  island  groups  (Table  4)  showed 
that  red-foots  favored  areas  less  exposed  to  the  trade  winds: 
most  nests  on  the  windward  motus  were  protected  by  well- 
developed  Pisonia  forests.  The  exposed  Central  Leeward 
Islets  held  the  lowest  nest  densities  ( 1 . 2  nests/ 1 .000  m2),  far  less 
than  on  the  South  Nake  Islets  (5.3/1,000  nr),  which  are 


protected  by  the  northern  edge  of  Long.  The  greatest  densities 
(7.8  nests/ 1 ,000  nr)  occurred  on  the  South  Nake  Islets  south  of 
Pandanus. 

Broadly  speaking,  red-foots  breed  in  well-dispersed 
colonies.  A  record  density  of  600  nests/ 1 ,000  m2  on  Tromelin 
Island  (Indian  Ocean)  is  exceptional.  Elsewhere, 
53  pairs/1,000  nr  on  Tower  Island  (Galapagos),  40/1,000  nr 
on  Moku  Manu  (Oahu.  Hawaii),  and  27/1,000  m2  on  Half 
Moon  Cay  (Honduras )  are  more  consistent  high-density  colonies 
(Nelson,  1978).  Only  on  tiny  Motu  Kota  (Subchapter  1.1, 
Fig.  52),  with  1 2  nests  in  303  nr  of  Tournefortia  (40/1 ,000  nr ). 
did  we  find  such  density,  and  for  this  reason  we  named  the  islet 
"Kota"  (Gilbertese  for  red-footed  booby). 

Phenology:  In  September  1988,  we  located  339  nests.  Of 
the  152  whose  contents  could  be  determined,  87  were  empty, 
63  contained  eggs,  and  2  held  downy  chicks.  We  saw  dozens 
of  flying  juveniles  along  the  windward  coasts.  Most  pairs  were 
building  or  guarding  their  nests  during  a  pre-laying  stage  that 
lasts  from  1 1-35  days  (Nelson,  1969).  Of  the  pairs  with  nests, 
57.2%  had  yet  to  lay  and  41.4%  had  laid  their  eggs  between 
mid-August  and  late  September  (Fig.  7).  Applied  to  the  total 
breeding  population,  approximately  1,270  nests  were  in  the 
prelaying  stage  and  would  be  expected  to  produce  eggs 
throughout  October.  An  additional  9 1 9  nests  had  a  mean  laying 
date  in  early  September  (Fig.  7).  Red-footed  boobies  were 
synchronous  with  brown  boobies  but  delayed  relative  to  masked 
boobies. 

In  June  1965.  nests  containing  prelaying  adults,  eggs,  and 
young  in  all  stages  indicated  that  the  birds  were  in  the  midst  of 
a  protracted  breeding  season  extending  from  January  to  June. 
Our  data  reveal  that  no  successful  nesting  occurred  in  May- 
June  1988.  Data  from  March  and  May  1990  indicate  that  nest- 
building  began  in  January  (or  earlier),  with  eggs  laid  from 
January  to  May.  Red-footed  boobies  in  other  tropical  locations 
have  variable,  opportunistic  breeding  seasons  that  depend 
upon  food  availability  (Nelson.  1978);  our  data  suggest  that 
similar  pressures  could  be  operating  at  Caroline. 

Color  Morphs:  Red-footed  boobies  are  polymorphic 
(Nelson,  1978).  The  basic  plumages  are  brown  or  white,  with 
brown  morphs  having  many  combinations  of  tail,  back,  scapular, 
foot,  and  bill  colors.  A  variety  of  brown  forms  and  white  forms 
occurred  on  Caroline,  with  a  ratio  of  9:1  (337  brown  to 
35  white),  which  contrasted  sharply  with  Nelson's  (1978) 
statement  that  "in  the  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands  all  birds  are 
white  morphs."  Most  of  the  dark  morphs  were  the  "white- 
tailed"  form  (see  Nelson,  1978.  pp.  660-661 ).  The  variations 
and  proportions  of  plumage  types  show  clinal  change  in  the 
Line  and  Phoenix  Islands  ( F.  Sibley,  personal  communication), 
and  the  question  of  plumage  morphology  needs  much  more 
study  in  the  central  Pacific. 

Great  Frigatebird  (Fregata  minor)  (Subchapter  1.1.  Figs.  7,8 
and  PL  42) 

The  great  frigatebird  breeds  at  widely  scattered  locations 
throughout  tropical  waters  in  the  Atlantic,  Pacific,  and  Indian 
Oceans.  It  is  known  to  breed  on  all  of  the  Line  Islands  except 
Starbuck  (Perry.  1980). 


143 


Distribution  and  Habitat  Preference:  Great  frigatebirds 
nested  on  25  islets,  including  Nake,  Long,  and  most  of  the 
larger  islets  (Fig.  8.  Table  1 1,  ranging  in  size  from  Azure 
(0.20  ha)  to  Nake  ( 107.46  ha).  Every  occupied  islet  had  some 
Pisonia  forest,  even  if  only  a  single  tree  (Azure).  The  larger 
islets  lacking  Pisonia  forest  (Arundel.  7.34  ha;  Tridacna. 
9.08  ha)  lacked  frigatebirds  in  1988.  although  frigatebird 
chicks  were  present  on  Arundel  in  early  1989  (Anne  Falconer, 
personal  communication). 

Although  great  frigatebirds  were  similar  in  nest 
requirements  to  red-footed  boobies,  there  were  significant 
differences:  the  frigates  tended  to  nest  higher  in,  and  closer  to, 
the  outer  edge  of  the  canopy  (although  nests  were  found  as  low 
as  1.3  m).  Nest  sites  were  more  sheltered  from  the  wind  than 
those  of  red-foots  and  in  locations  where  the  birds  could  take 
flight  easily.  Such  site  preferences  may  explain  the  association 
with  Pisonia.  Pisonia  reaches  25  m  on  Caroline,  taller  than 
other  tree  species,  providing  a  windbreak  on  most  islets.  The 
largest  colonies  (Nake.  Long,  Pig.  Mannikiba)  were  found 
leeward  of  these  stands.  We  found  nests  in  Tournefortia, 
Pisonia.  and  Cordia.  They  were  often  in  the  Tournefortia- 
Pisonia  interface,  generally  in  the  taller  Tournefortia.  One 
colony  on  south  Long  overhung  the  lagoon  in  a  dense  Pisonia 
stand.  Frigates  were  not  found  in  any  anthropogenic  forests 
and  were  absent  from  then-inhabited  Ana-Ana. 

Numbers:  The  previous  population  estimate  for  great 
frigatebirds  on  Caroline  was  10. 000  birds  (Clapp  &  Sibley, 
1971a:  Perry,  1980).  We  calculated  that  2.427  pairs  bred  or 
attended  territories.  An  additional  617  birds  roosted,  thus  the 
entire  population  was  approximately  5,471  individuals.  A 
large  but  undetermined  number  of  birds  soared  over  the  atoll 
throughout  the  day,  and  an  uncountable  number  of  birds, 
including  Hedged  juveniles  that  would  ultimately  return  to  the 
island  to  nest  (Diamond.  1971).  were  undoubtedly  at  sea. 
Because  this  species  is  difficult  to  count  accurately,  it  is  unclear 
if  the  population  has  changed  since  1965. 

Phenology:  In  frigatebirds.  the  scapulars,  which  first 
appear  at  81  days  in  Fregata  magnificent  (Diamond.  1973). 
erupt  before  the  primaries.  Because  we  lack  chick  stage  data 
for  F.  minor  and  F.  arid,  we  have  modified  ages  from  Diamond 
(  1 973 )  for  F.  magnificens,  using  the  hatching  times  for  F.  arid 
and  F.  minor  from  Nelson  (1976)  and  fledgling  ages  from 
Diamond!  1 975b)  to  construct  approximate  development  stages 
for  the  species  on  Caroline.  Since  (hey  Hedged  at  an  earlier  age 
than  /•'.  magnificens,  we  have  reduced  the  ages  for  chicks  with 
erupting  primaries  for  F.  arid  and  F.  minor,  kept  the  duration 
of  the  earlier  stages  approximately  the  same,  and  reduced  the 
period  in  juvenile  plumage. 

We  found  214  nests  in  1988.  Of  the  144  in  which  we 
determined  contents,  49  contained  eggs  or  young  chicks. 
27  held  chicks  with  developing  scapular  feathers,  and 
68  contained  older  chicks  (fable  5 1.  The  additional  70  adults 
occupied  nests  oi  unknown  contents;  mans  probably  held  eggs 
or  young  chicks  or  were  empty.  We  saw  fewer  than 
10  displaying  males,  so  the  breeding  season  was  winding 
dow  n.  This  was  also  indicated  by  the  high  proportion  1 87'  i  |oi 
nests  with  chicks,  mam  ol  them  old.  A  major  laving  effort  had 


begun  in  March-April  (Fig.  9)  and  continued  into  September. 
In  March  1 990.  an  abundance  of  fly  ing  juveniles  and  occasional 
larger  chicks  down  to  the  downy  stage  indicated  that  the 
previous  year's  breeding  season  was  ending.  A  small  number 
of  males  were  beginning  another  courtship  cycle.  By  May 
1990,  courtship  and  egg-laying  were  still  under  way,  and  nests 
contained  eggs  or  small  chicks  up  to  the  "remiges"  stage.  Peak 
laying  on  Christmas  Island  ( Pacific  Ocean)  occurs  from  March 
to  May  (Schreiber  &  Ashmole.  1970),  the  same  laving  cycle 
observed  on  Caroline  in  1988  and  1990. 

Lesser  Frigatebird  (Fregata  ariel)  (Figs.  8.10) 

The  lesser  frigatebird  is.  along  with  F.  minor,  one  of  the 
true  pantropical  species.  It  breeds  and  disperses  widely  within 
the  tropical  Pacific  (Sibley  &  Clapp.  1967).  One  of  the  largest 
populations  in  the  world  (30.000-85.000)  breeds  on  McKean 
Island,  in  the  Phoenix  Group  (Garnett.  1983).  Lesser  frigatebirds 
breed  on  four  of  the  Line  Islands,  with  the  population  on 
Maiden  (7.000)  the  largest  in  the  archipelago  (Perry.  1980). 

Distribution  and  Habitat  Preference:  In  June  1965.  lesser 
frigatebirds  were  found  nesting  in  one  compact  colony  on  the 
leeward  north  end  of  Long  (Clapp  &  Sibley.  1971a).  We  found 
a  single  colony  in  leeward  Pisonia  forest  on  western  Nake 
(Fig.  8).  both  in  September  1988  and  May  1990.  The  birds 
nested  high  (to  18  m)  in  the  Pisonia  and  Pisonia-Conlia  edge 
facing  an  open  Tournefortia  savannah.  Although  primarily 
composed  of  F.  ariel.  a  few  F.  minor  were  scattered  along  all 
but  the  eastern  edge  of  the  colony.  West  of  the  birds,  across  the 
open  forest.  F.  minor  and  Sula  sula  nested  in  a  mixed  colony  in 
a  denser  stand  of  Tournefortia.  Birds  were  seen  soaring  over 
Nake.  Long,  and  the  leeward  islets  but  were  not  found  roosting 
or  nesting  away  from  the  colony  on  Nake.  How  ever,  in  March 
1990.  approximately  650  lesser  frigatebirds  were  swarming 
above,  and  roosting  on.  Motu  Nautonga  in  a  light  cluster. 
possibly  preparing  for  nesting. 

Numbers  and  Phenology:  Pacific  Ocean  Biological  Sun  ev 
Program  biologists  estimated  a  population  of  1.000  lesser 
frigatebirds  on  Caroline  in  June  1965.  with  400  ±  \0%  breeding: 
only  eggs  were  found  (Clapp  &  Sibley.  197  la).  On  Christmas 
Island.  F.  ariel  laid  in  May  and  June  in  1959.  1963.  1964.  and 
1 967  ( Schreiber  &  Ashmole.  1970).  Of  46  nests  found  in  1988. 
we  could  inspect  the  contents  of  only  26:  all  contained 
feathered  chicks  (Table  5).  Laying  dates  ranged  from  March 
through  July  (Fig.  10).  with  a  peak  from  April  to  June.  Caroline's 
lesser  frigates,  therefore,  appeared  to  be  synchronous  with 
those  on  Christmas. 

Because  w  e  did  not  determine  the  colony  limits,  we  cannot 
provide  a  population  estimate.  There  was  a  minimum  of 
20( )  birds  in  1 988  ( 46  nests,  plus  roosting  and  flying  indiv  iduals) 
and  500  pairs  in  1990. 

Sooty  Tern  (Sterna  fuscata)  (Figs.  11.12:  Subchapter  1.1. 
PI.  59) 

This  tern  is  the  most  widespread  and  abundant  tropical 
seabird  in  the  world.  Under  favorable  conditions  it  forms 
immense  colonies  numbering  into  the  millions.  It  is  known  to 
breed  on  7  of  the  Line  Islands:   the  largest  population  in  the 


144 


Pacific  is  found  on  Christmas  Island  (15,000,000  at  highest 
count),  and  3,000,000  have  been  recorded  on  Starbuck  (Perry, 
1980). 

Distribution  and  Habitat  Preference:  To  date,  19  colonies 
from  10  islets  are  known  for  the  years  1965,  1988,  1989,  and 
1990  (Fig.  11).  In  September  1988,  we  found  three  colonies, 
two  on  the  northern  half  of  Long  and  one  on  Bo' sun  Bird  Islet; 
all  fit  the  general  habitat  description  in  Clapp  &  Sibley  ( 1 97 1  a). 
Colony  A,  nearly  square,  was  210  m  on  a  side.  Eggs  were 
placed  under  a  savannah-type  Tournefortia  scrub,  from  1-4  m 
tall  with  approximately  60%  canopy  cover  (Subchapter  1.1, 
PI.  59).  The  substrate  was  coral  rubble  mixed  with  sand, 
covered  by  Heliotropium  (5%),  Portulaca  (1%),  Laportea 
(<  1  % ),  and  Lepturus  (<  1  %),  typical  of  old  interisland  channels. 
Colony  1  was  located  in  a  broad  sandy  corridor  with  two  large 
"groves"  of  Tournefortia.  The  northern  subpopulation  extended 
116  m  along  the  windward  beach,  but  248  m  along  the  lagoon. 
The  southern  subpopulation  began  28  m  further  south  along  the 
beach,  fronted  the  seaward  reef  for  86  m,  and  was  shaped  like 
a  blunt  triangle,  its  apex  pointing  toward  the  lagoon.  Most 
chicks  were  under  Tournefortia,  which  consisted  of  shrubs 
2-4  m  high  with  80%  canopy  cover.  The  substrate  was  also 
older  beach  sands  mixed  with  coral  rubble  and  covered  with 
Portulaca  (40%  cover),  Lepturus  (<5%),  and  Heliotropium 
(<5%).  The  Bo'sun  Bird  colony,  a  rough  oval  approximately 
55  m  wide  by  70  m  long,  was  under  2-3  m  high  Tournefortia 
with  75%  cover,  on  coral  rubble/sand  sparsely  carpeted  with 
Portulaca  and  Heliotropium. 

Numbers:  Populations  were  determined  by  measuring 
colony  dimensions,  then  counting  eggs  and/or  chicks  in  9-m2 
sample  plots  located  at  random  points  along  a  compass  line. 
Because  juveniles  moved  as  we  approached,  they  were  counted 
6  m  ahead  of  us  in  estimated  3  x  6  m  plots.  The  Colony  I 
subcolonies  (North,  South)  were  treated  separately. 

Colony  size  (rounded)  in  1988  ranged  from 
1 27,000  ±  30,000  "nests"  (Colony  A)  to  1,500  ±750  new  eggs 
on  Bo'sun  Bird  Islet  (Table  6).  There  were  an  additional 
6,900  +  1 ,600  nearly-fledged  chicks  in  the  Bo'sun  Bird  colony, 
resulting  from  eggs  laid  three  months  earlier. 

The  total  number  of  eggs  and  chicks  was  188,000  ±21%. 
Actual  numbers  of  adults  are  difficult  to  estimate  but  in  other 
studies  have  exceeded  the  number  of  eggs  and  young  by  factors 
of  more  than  two  because  innumerable  eggs  and  chicks  were 
lost,  colonies  often  overlapped,  and  many  nonbreeding  adults 
joined  the  prebreeding  swarms  or  associated  with  breeding 
birds.  Schreiber  &  Ashmole  (1970),  relying  on  POBSP  data 
from  Johnston  Atoll  (north-central  Pacific),  estimated  that  four 
adults  were  present  for  each  egg  laid.  Pacific  Ocean  Biological 
Survey  Program  data  from  Johnston  (Amerson  &  Shelton, 
1976)  indicated  that  about  600,000  adults  were  present  in  a 
colony  with  105,000  eggs,  or  approximately  5.7  adults/egg.  If 
we  assume  that  real  numbers  of  terns  in  our  colonies  lay 
midway  between  4  and  5.7  times  the  number  of  eggs  and 
chicks,  then  the  number  of  sooty  terns  using  Caroline  Atoll 
would  have  ranged  between  720,000  and  1,100.000  birds 
(91 1.800±21%).  This  is  twice  the  estimate  provided  by  Clapp 
&  Sibley  (1971a),  even  though  we  found  fewer  colonies. 


In  March  1990,  laying  was  just  beginning  in  two  colonies 
on  Long  Island,  (625  x  1 50-3 1 5  m  wide  and  1 80  x  1 60  m  wide). 
Enormous  numbers  of  birds,  both  on  the  ground  in  densities  up 
to  9  or  1 0  pairs/nr  and  in  the  air,  made  it  impossible  to  calculate 
a  reasonable  population  figure.  According  to  Anne  Falconer, 
these  two  colonies  were  very  successful.  Similarly,  counting 
was  difficult  in  May  1990  when  six  large  prebreeding  swirls 
hovered  like  huge  clouds  of  gnats  over  discrete  islets  and  islet 
groups  (Fig.  1 1).  Our  1988  estimate  of  approximately  one 
million  birds  is  probably  a  conservative  count  for  the  atoll  as  a 
whole  on  an  annual  basis. 

Phenology:  The  incubation  period  in  sooty  terns  is  about 
4  weeks  (Dinsmore,  1972).  Young  fledged  7-8  weeks  after 
hatching,  although  fledgling  ages,  dependent  upon  food  supply 
(Schreiber  &  Ashmole,  1970),  are  highly  variable. 

Four  separate  sooty  tern  colonies  had  been  started  over  the 
12-week  period  prior  to  our  study  in  1988  (Table  6).  On  Bo'sun 
Bird  Islet  a  new  wave  of  laying  was  just  beginning  in  an  open 
area  immediately  southwest  of  most  of  the  colony,  while  nearly 
fledged  chicks  scurried  about  beneath  the  Tournefortia. 
Undoubtedly  many  young  had  already  fledged,  so  many  more 
eggs  would  have  been  laid  in  early  July  by  this  colony  than 
indicated  (Fig.  12).  The  two  colonies  on  Long  were  established 
at  different  times:  the  short-tailed  juveniles  in  Colony  1 
preceded  the  large  number  of  eggs,  hatching  eggs,  and  downy 
chicks  of  Colony  A  by  3-4  weeks. 

The  July-September  laying  period  on  Caroline  in  1988  is 
very  different  from  the  bimodal  breeding  (May-June, 
December-January)  reported  from  Christmas  Island,  Pacific 
Ocean  (Schreiber  &  Ashmole,  1 970),  and  the  May  laying  dates 
noted  for  Caroline  by  the  POBSP  in  1965.  Additional  data 
(Anne  Falconer,  personal  communication)  indicate  that  sooty 
terns  may  lay  any  time  (Fig.  11),  certainly  January  through 
September  (1988  to  1990).  Severe  storms,  which  destroyed 
large  Long  Island  colonies  in  February  1990,  were  perhaps 
responsible  for  reinitiating  breeding  activities  on  the  leeward 
side  of  the  atoll  within  the  next  few  months.  A  great  deal  more 
research  will  be  needed  on  Caroline  before  the  breeding  seasons 
for  this  species  are  fully  understood. 

Brown  Noddy  (Anous  stolidus)  (Fig.  13) 

This  tern,  primarily  a  tree  nester,  is  widely  distributed 
throughout  the  warm  oceans  of  the  world.  It  is  abundant  in  the 
Line  and  Phoenix  Groups,  with  an  estimated  total  population 
exceeding  40,000  birds.  Brown  noddies  are  most  abundant  on 
Palmyra  Island  (10,000  birds). 

Distribution  and  Habitat  Preference:  The  brown  noddy  is 
second  only  to  the  white  tern  in  the  number  of  motus  (28)  upon 
which  it  is  known  to  breed  (Fig.  13).  It  utilized  the  smallest 
(Noddy  Rock,  0.02  ha)  and  largest  (South,  104.41  ha)  motus, 
nesting  upon  coral  rubble  and  in  plant  communities  ranging 
from  the  simplest  herb  mats  to  Tournefortia.  Pisonia,  Cordia, 
Cocos,  and  the  mixed  anthropogenic  forests  of  South  and 
Nake.  Most  pairs  were  well  dispersed,  nesting  from  the  outer 
edges  of  Tournefortia  to  the  central,  inner  branches  of  Pisonia, 
and  from  the  ground  to  the  crowns  of  25-m  Cocos.  When 
nesting  sympatrically  with  black  noddies  in  Pisonia.  the  brown 


145 


noddies  typically  occupied  portions  of  branches  closest  to  the 
trunk.  Brown  noddies  nested  almost  solitarily  in  the  Cocos 
canopy  on  South,  were  found  within  dense  colonies  of  black 
noddies  and  white  terns  in  tall  Pisonia  forests,  with  red-footed 
boobies  and  great  frigatebirds  in  Tournefortia,  and  amidst 
sooty  tems  and  red-tailed  tropicbirds  (Bo'sun  Bird  Islet). 
Apart  from  a  few  ground  nesters  on  Raurau  and  Fishball,  the 
only  ground-nesting  colony  (80  nests)  was  located  on  a 
Portulaca  mat  on  Noddy  Rock — a  site  free  of  predators, 
although  flooded  during  storms. 

Brown  noddies  often  formed  loose  roosting  "clubs"  on  the 
atol  1 '  s  beaches.  Aggregations  of  1 5-20  birds  were  found  on  the 
west  coast  of  South  and  on  Sandy  Inlet,  south-central  Nake. 

Numbers:  Clapp  &  Sibley  ( 1 97 1  a)  estimated  a  population 
of  1,000  birds  in  June  1965,  with  about  800  birds  breeding 
(with  eggs  and  young).  We  estimated  a  total  population  of 
1,491  breeding  pairs  (Table  1 ).  Because  nests  high  in  Cocos 
palms  were  difficult  to  detect,  we  undoubtedly  overlooked 
many,  and  our  estimate  of  approximately  3.000  birds  is 
conservative.  Although  larger  than  the  population  estimated 
by  POBSP  (Clapp  &  Sibley,  1971a),  uncertainties  about  the 
1965  survey  coverage  (F.  Sibley,  personal  communication) 
prevent  us  from  knowing  if  Caroline's  population  has  changed 
over  the  past  25  years. 

Phenology:  On  Christmas  Island,  the  timing  of  egg  laying 
varies  between  colonies.  In  general,  peak  laying  occurs  from 
March  to  May,  and  from  November  to  December.  On  Caroline, 
mating  and  nest-building  were  found  in  March  1990,  but  by 
May  only  a  few  eggs  had  been  laid.  Eggs  and  young  were  found 
in  June  1965  (Clapp  &  Sibley,  1971a)  and  in  September  1988 
(present  study).  We  found  246  nests  in  September  1988  and 
determined  the  contents  of  106:  103  held  eggs,  3  held  downy 
chicks.  The  incubation  period  is  35-37  days  (Dorward  & 
Ashmole,  1963),  so  all  viable  eggs  had  been  laid  within  the 
previous  40  days  (mid-August  to  late  September).  Because 
many  nests  were  being  built,  we  feel  confident  that  laying 
continued  into  October.  Clearly  more  research  is  needed  to 
determine  whether  laying  occurs  in  regular  cycles. 

Black  Noddy  ( Anous  minutus)  (Fig.  14) 

The  black  noddy  is  widely  distributed  in  the  tropical 
Atlantic  and  Pacific.  It  is  abundant  in  the  Line  and  Phoenix 
Groups,  with  populations  of  16,000  estimated  in  the  Phoenix 
Islands  (Clapp,  1967)  and  over  46.000  in  the  Line  Group. 
Centers  of  abundance  are  Palmyra  (20,000)  and  Christmas 
(14.500)  (Perry,  1980). 

Distribution  and  Habitat  Preference:  The  black  noddy  is 
a  tree-nesting  species  that  on  Caroline  prefers  tall  stands  of 
Pisonia.  The  largest  colonies  (61%  of  the  population)  were 
found  in  the  grand  Pisonia  forests  (to  25  m)  on  Pig  and  North 
Pig,  We  found  breeding  birds  on  18  motus.  with  colonies 
exceeding  200  pairs  in  the  Pisonia  on  Nake,  Long,  Arundel, 
and  Bird  (Fig.  14).  The  only  significant  colony  not  primarily 
associated  with  Pisonia  was  found  on  Tridacna,  where 
approximately  230  pairs  nested  in  the  tallest  (ca.  8  m),  most 
central  Toumefortia-Morinda  forest.  Black  noddies  always 
nested  in  dense  colonies  near  islet  centers  and  were  integral 


components  of  these  plant  communities:  their  droppings, 
coating  the  ground  with  a  film  of  guano,  constantly  enriched 
the  islet's  meager  soils. 

Numbers:  Clapp  &  Sibley  (1971a)  estimated  that 
7,000  ±  25%  birds  were  on  Caroline.  During  our  visit  the 
population  was  much  larger:  5,122  pairs  were  estimated  for  Pig 
and  North  Pig  alone  (Table  1 ).  Basing  our  numbers  primarily 
on  the  densities  of  sampled  colonies  in  Pisonia,  we  estimated 
that  nearly  8,400  pairs  were  nesting  during  our  1 988  visit.  Our 
population  estimate  approached  17.000  birds,  to  which  an 
unknown  number  of  nonbreeding  birds  could  be  added.  These 
values  place  the  Caroline  population  far  above  that  for 
Christmas,  making  it  the  largest  known  population  in  Kiribati. 

Phenology:  Black  noddies  were  just  beginning  a  new 
breeding  season.  On  27  September  we  observed  hundreds  of 
birds  gathering  Tournefortia  leaves  floating  along  the  windward 
shore  (Long)  or  flying  with  fresh  leaves  to  their  nests  (Pig, 
North  Pig).  Of  the  1,085  pairs  counted  on  transect,  536(49%) 
perched  as  pairs,  were  defending  nest  sites,  or  were  building 
nests.  An  additional  273  pairs  were  attending  nearly-completed 
nests  but  were  not  incubating.  The  remaining  276  pairs  were 
incubating.  Thus,  75%  of  the  pairs  had  not  laid  eggs.  The 
contents  of  230  nests  were  unknown,  although  we  assumed 
they  contained  eggs  because  of  the  incubating  positions  of  the 
adults.  Of  46  nests  into  which  we  could  see,  45  held  a  single 
egg,  and  one  contained  a  downy  chick  less  than  5  days  old. 

The  breeding  seasons  for  black  noddies  on  Christmas 
Island  and  Johnston  Atoll  peak  in  April  and  May  (Schreiber& 
Ashmole,  1970;  Amerson  &  Shelton,  1976),  where  pairs  are 
highly  synchronous,  laying  most  of  their  eggs  within  a 
2-3-  month  period.  The  Caroline  colony,  also  synchronous, 
but  beginning  egg-production  in  September,  would  be  expected 
to  peak  in  October/November,  six  months  out  of  phase  with  the 
colonies  further  north.  In  1990.  however,  black  noddies  were 
just  beginning  to  mate  and  nest  in  March,  and  by  May  some 
were  still  sitting  tightly  on  nests,  while  others  had  chicks  in  all 
stages. 

Blue-gray  Noddy  (Procelsterna  cerulea) 

Blue-gray  noddies  nest  widely  across  the  Pacific  from  the 
Kermadec  Islands  to  Hawaii.  They  are  scattered  throughout 
the  Line  and  Phoenix  Groups.  In  the  Line  Islands,  they  were 
formerly  known  to  breed  only  on  Christmas  and  Maiden 
(Perry,  1980).  Eggs  are  placed  in  nests  minimally  provided 
with  twigs  and  may  be  on  coral  rubble,  sheltered  under 
vegetation,  or  under  coral  slabs  to  depths  of  I  m  (Rauzon 
etai,  1984). 

The  blue-gray  noddy  was  recorded  as  "present"  on  Caroline 
by  Perry  ( 1 980).  Clapp  &  Sibley  ( 1 97 1  a)  noted  birds  over  the 
lagoon  hut  saw  none  on  land.  When  we  approached  Caroline, 
we  saw  two  from  the  ship  and  later  observed  three  Hying  across 
the  lagoon.  We  also  saw  three  birds  perched  on  the  leeward 
islets,  one  each  on  the  reef  flats  of  Nautonga  and  Fitei.  A  third 
bird  Hushed  repeatedly  from  a  small  clearing  around  a  pile  of 
bottles  on  Raurau.  but  we  failed  to  find  a  nest.  In  March  and 
May  1 990,  we  observed  blue-gray  noddies  on  all  of  the  Southern 
Leewards,  plus  Azure  and  Nautonga  in  the  Central  Leewards. 


146 


In  summer  1990,  Alexandre  Falconer  found  one  small 
blue-gray  noddy  chick,  attended  by  its  parents,  on  an  open 
expanse  of  coral  rubble  on  Motu  Eitei,  the  first  breeding  record 
for  Caroline.  Eitei  is  adjacent  to  Raurau,  which  we  predicted 
was  the  most  likely  breeding  location  for  this  species. 

Blue-gray  noddies  evidently  breed  in  very  small  numbers 
on  Caroline.  Nests  are  hard  to  find,  given  their  cryptic  placement, 
the  small  number  of  birds  present,  and  the  extent  of  open 
habitat  (67.7  ha  of  herb  mats  and  41 .4  ha  of  consolidated  coral 
rubble). 

White  Tern  (Gygis  alba)  (Fig.  15,  PI.  3;  Subchapter  1 . 1 .  PI.  55) 

The  white  tern  is  a  widely-distributed  pantropical  species 
occurring  in  moderate  numbers  throughout  the  Line  and  Phoenix 
Groups.  Clapp  ( 1967)  estimated  10,000  birds  in  the  Phoenix 
Group,  and  Perry  (1980)  estimated  17,050  birds  for  the  Line 
Islands. 

Distribution  and  Habitat  Preference:  White  terns,  the  most 
widely  distributed  breeding  bird  on  Caroline,  nested  on  32  of 
the  39  motus  (Fig.  15).  The  only  islets  not  occupied  were  tiny 
and  sparsely  vegetated. 

White  terns  nested  from  1  to  15  m  above  the  ground, 
wherever  a  branch  or  frond  provided  a  relatively  stable  platform 
in  Tournefortia  (PI.  3),  Pisonia,  Cordia,  Pandanus  ,  or  Cocos 
(Subchapter  1 . 1 ,  PI.  55).  They  did  not  form  dense  colonies  but 
were  scattered  from  the  edge  to  the  center  of  each  islet,  even  on 
the  windward  sides,  although  they  normally  selected  sites  not 
directly  exposed  to  the  prevailing  trade  winds.  They  utilized 
isolated  trees,  scrub,  or  forest.  An  unusual  departure  from  the 
white  tern's  usual  mode  of  "nesting"  was  an  egg  laid  in  an  old 
black  noddy  nest,  6  m  up  in  an  8-m-tall  Tournefortia  on 
Tridacna  Islet. 

White  tern  densities  varied  from  islet  to  islet  (Table  7).  At 
one  extreme,  we  found  only  two  nests  on  Raurau 
(0.07/1,000  nr).  Densities  on  other  islets  ranged  from 
0.75/1,000  m2  (Shark)  to  6.67/1,000  nr  (Nautonga)  with  a 
mean  density  of  1 .38  pairs/1 ,000  nr  of  woodland.  Overall,  the 
Windward  Islets  supported  the  highest  densities.  Although 
white  terns  also  nested  in  anthropogenic  forests,  their  densities 
were  low:  we  believe  that  the  low  densities  on  South  Island  and 
the  Southern  Leewards  (Table  7)  are  attributable  to  man.  Of 
South' s  104.47  ha  of  vegetated  land,  only  4.2  ha  (4.4%)  was 
native  woodland  (Subchapter  1.1,  Fig.  50);  fully  84%  was 
either  Cocos  (18.3  ha)  or  Cocos-lpomoea  (62.5  ha)  forest. 
Although  most  of  the  Southern  Leewards  are  covered  in 
unmodified  natural  forest,  central  Ana-Ana  has  been  partly 
cleared  (0.21  ha)  to  accommodate  thatched  huts  and  a  garden. 
The  activities  of  a  family  of  four,  with  a  dog  and  cat  (until 
October  1990),  have  apparently  depressed  the  white  tern 
population  on  Ana-Ana  and,  perhaps,  even  on  nearby  islets. 
We  found  no  white  terns  on  Ana- Ana  during  our  visit,  although 
the  Falconers,  who  vacated  the  atoll  in  summer  1991,  assured 
us  that  they  occasionally  nested. 

Numbers:  We  used  the  total  woodland  area  of  each  islet 
to  calculate  islet  populations  (Table  1 )  from  our  transect  data. 
More  birds  were  found  on  the  largest  islets  except  South  Island. 
We  estimated  1,094  pairs  for  Nake,  751  pairs  for  Long,  and 
nearly  400  pairs  for  Tridacna;  these  3  islets  accounted  for  over 


half  the  population  (and  over  half  the  native  woodland).  We 
estimated  that  3,957  pairs  bred  on  Caroline.  This  doubles  the 
numbers  of  Clapp  &  S ibley  ( 1 97 1  a)  and  cited  by  Perry  ( 1 980) 
and  exceeds  by  3,000  the  largest  population  formerly  known 
for  the  Line  Islands. 

Phenology:  Of  569  pairs  of  white  terns  recorded  on 
transect,  437  were  roosting  without  obvious  signs  of  eggs  or 
chicks,  107  were  incubating,  and  25  had  chicks  (often  adults 
were  not  present).  Of  the  25  chicks  recorded,  17  were  downy, 
7  retained  extensive  traces  of  down  with  remiges,  and  1  was 
almost  ready  to  fly.  Incubation  takes  about  36  days  ( Ashmole, 
1963);  young  may  require  from  40  to  96  days  to  fledged 
(Gibson-Hill,  1950;  Ashmole,  1968).  Nearly  all  chicks  were 
far  from  Hedging  and  were  less  than  4  weeks  old. 

On  Christmas  Island,  Schreiber&  Ashmole  (1970)  found 
that  peak  laying  occurred  in  April-August  each  year,  with 
some  laying  in  each  month.  On  Caroline,  Clapp  &  Sibley 
(1971a)  noted  that  about  half  of  the  birds  had  eggs,  half  had 
young  in  June  1965.  In  March  1990,  we  found  only  a  few  eggs 
and  downy  chicks,  but  in  May  a  larger  number  of  pairs  were 
breeding,  with  eggs  and  chicks  in  all  stages.  Although  we 
found  that  white  terns  on  Caroline  do  lay  during  the  peak  period 
on  Christmas,  it  was  clear  that  in  1 988  most  eggs  were  laid  after 
mid-August. 

Other  Birds  on  Caroline  Atoll 

Seven  species  other  than  seabirds  have  now  been  recorded 
on  Caroline.  Six  of  them  are  migrants  (five  shorebirds  and  a 
long-tailed  cuckoo).  The  reef  heron  is  apparently  resident, 
although  no  nest  has  yet  been  found. 

Reef  Heron  (Egretta  sacra) 

We  found  15  reef  herons  scattered  on  8  islands:  Nake  (1), 
Long  (2),  Pig  (1),  Brothers  (3),  South  (2),  Mannikiba  (2), 
Matawa(l),  and  Emerald  (2),  as  well  as  on  the  open  reef  flats 
( 1 ).  Although  birds  were  found  on  both  the  seaward  and 
lagoonward  sides  of  the  islets,  most  were  along  the  lagoon 
edge,  as  also  found  by  POBSP  in  1965  (Clapp  &  Sibley, 
197  la).  We  estimated  that  approximately  30  birds  were  using 
the  atoll.  We  found  no  signs  of  breeding.  Of  the  15  individuals 
we  observed,  5  were  dark,  8  were  white,  and  2  were  of  the  pied 
morph. 

Lesser  Golden-plover  (Pluvialis  dominica) 

This  plover  used  the  beaches  and  herb  mats,  generally  to 
seaward.  In  September  1988,  we  found  them  on  Nake  (1), 
Long  (4),  Tridacna  (4),  and  Mannikiba  (1),  estimating  a  total 
population  of  20-30  birds,  the  same  number  found  by  POBSP 
(Clapp  &  Sibley,  1971a).  In  March  1990,  we  observed  eight, 
and  in  May,  three,  all  in  winter  plumage. 

Wandering/Siberian  Tattler  (Heteroscelus  incanum  or 
H.  brevipes) 

In  September  1988,  we  located  18  tattlers  on  6  different 
islets:  Nake  (3),  Long  (3),  Crescent  ( 1 ),  Arundel  (2),  South  (7), 
and  Emerald  (2).  All  birds  were  either  alone  or  in  pairs  and 
generally  remained  in  the  intertidal  zone,  although  they  often 


147 


foraged  on  herb  mats  close  to  the  beach  scrub.  The  total 
population  was  approximately  40  birds.  Those  few  birds  heard 
were  all  H.  incanum.  We  saw  six  tattlers  in  March  1990  and 
several  in  May  of  the  same  year. 

Ruddy  Turnstone  ( Arenaria  interpres) 

One  turnstone  w  as  found  on  the  windward  beach  of  Motu 
Mannikiba  in  September  1988.  and  five  on  atoll  beaches  in 
March  1990.  The  Caroline  population  probably  does  not 
exceed  1 5  birds. 

Bristle-thighed  Curlew  (Numenius  tahitiensis) 
(Subchapter  1.1,  PI.  23) 

The  bristle-thighed  curlew,  common  in  the  Line  and 
Phoenix  Groups,  is  a  widespread  migrant  to  the  low  atolls  of  the 
central  and  South  Pacific  during  the  boreal  winter  (Pratt  el  ai, 
1987).  One  of  the  world's  least-studied  shorebirds,  the  species 
is  considered  rare  throughout  its  range  (Johnsgard,  1981; 
Marks  et  ai,  1990)  and  is  a  candidate  for  the  US  Fish  & 
Wildlife  Service  Endangered  Species  List  (Gill.  1990).  Clapp 
&  Sibley!  197  la)  estimated  20  birds  for  Caroline  in  June  1965. 

We  counted  83  birds  on  12  of  Caroline's  islets  in  1988. 
including  the  3  large  islands  (Nake.  Long,  South)  and  motus  in 
the  Windwards,  Central  Leewards,  and  Southern  Leewards. 
In  March  1990,  we  saw  20  curlews  on  10  islets  during 
incidental  observations  throughout  the  atoll,  bringing  the  total 
number  of  islets  on  which  they  have  been  recorded  to  16.  On 
our  return  trip  (May  1990)  we  only  saw  three  curlews  (only 
eight  islets  visited).  Undoubtedly,  curlews  occur  on  all  islets, 
utilizing  essentially  all  plant  communities.  Although  they  are 
most  conspicuous  on  the  beaches  and  reef  flats,  higher  numbers 
may  actually  forage  in  the  forests  during  the  day.  The  Falconers 
(personal  communication)  note  that  small  numbers  of  curlews 
remain  all  year.  They  are  least  common  between  April  and 
August  and  most  abundant  after  September/October.  This 
correlates  with  preliminary  information  from  Rangiroa  Atoll. 
Tuamotu  Archipelago  (Gill.  1990;  Gill  &  Redmond,  in  prep.). 

Perimeter  Habitats:  On  a  complete  perimeter  count  of 
South  Island  in  1988,  we  found  29  curlews.  Twenty-one  were 
foraging  and  loitering  on  the  windward  east  coast,  principally 
above  the  beach  crest  on  coral  rubble  interspersed  with  herb 
mat.  Similarly.  14  of  20  curlews  found  on  Long  and  the 
Windward  Islets  foraged  along  the  windward  beach  crest,  with 
only  6  birds  found  on  the  lagoonward  shores.  Curlews  were 
equally  common  on  windward  and  leeward  shores  in  the 
leeward  islets,  occupying  habitats  composed  of  coral  rubble 
and  sand.  While  the  numbers  indicate  that  curlews  showed  a 
preference  tor  windward  shores,  they  may  be  biased  because 
most  birds  were  there  in  late  evening  (19  birds  on  South). 
Perhaps  the\  use  the  relativeh  open  areas  for  roosting  and 
foraging  at  dusk.  Certainly  the  largest  concentrations  ( 13.  14) 
were  found  late  in  the  day.  We  found  our  largest  flock  ( 14. 
Sands  Inlet,  Nake)  at  1 600  h,  foraging  on  compacted,  silt)  sand 
at  the  lagoonward  end  of  the  inlet,  while  single  curlews  dotted 
the  interislet  channels  and  shallow  tidal  reef  flats. 

Vegetated  Habitats:  We  found  bristle-thighed  curlew  s  on 
natural  herb  mats,  in  Tournefortia  scrub.  Pisonia  forest,  and  in 


Cocos  habitats,  both  in  the  healthy  peripheral  plantations  and 
w  ithin  the  dying  Cocos— Ipomoea  woodlands  ( Subchapter  1.1. 
Fig.  36.  PI.  34).  One  was  captured  in  a  mist  net  under  a  dense 
Cocos  canopy.  Disintegrating  plantations  in  the  center  of 
South  (54  ha)  held  a  large  population:  calculated  numbers 
produced  an  estimate  of  154  curlews.  They  foraged  over  the 
//wwoefl-strewn  ground,  frequently  using  broken-topped 
coconut  trunks  as  lookouts.  We  also  found  5  curlews  on 
transects  in  Pisonia  forests  up  to  20  m  tall  on  Nake  (calculated 
population,  41 ).  They  were  foraging  on  the  relatively  open, 
although  dimly  lit,  forest  floor. 

Numbers:  From  the  1988  data  we  estimated  a  population 
of  ±300  curlews:  41  birds  in  Pisonia,  154  in  Cocos-Ipomoea, 
43  on  the  beaches  of  South  Island  (29)  and  the  Sandy  Inlet  of 
Nake  (14),  and  another  62  scattered  over  the  remainder  of  the 
atoll.  Because  154  of  them  were  calculated  from  the  sighting 
of  a  flock  of  7  curlews  on  one  transect  on  South,  there  may  be 
a  bias  in  our  population  estimate.  Incidental  observations  made 
off-transect  did  show,  however,  that  curlews  were  common  in 
the  Cocos-lpomoea  woodlands,  and  we  believe  that  the  numbers 
on  the  104  ha  that  compose  South  Island  approximated  our 
estimated  density  (about  1.5  birds/ha). 

Bill  Length:  Bristle-thighed  curlews  show  great  variation 
in  bill  length  immediately  after  the  breeding  season.  Because 
birds  of  the  year  migrate  south  before  their  bills  reach  adult 
length  (R.Gill,  personal  communication ).  the  ratio  of  "long"  to 
"short"  bills  provides  a  rough  estimate  of  juvenile  survival.  Of 
3 1  curlews  seen  in  September.  20  were  clearly  adult  length. 
7  were  conspicuously  shorter,  and  4  were  "intermediate" 
(probably  young  birds).  All  March  and  May  birds  had  long, 
adult-sized  bills. 

Some  subadults  also  remain  on  their  Pacific  wintering 
grounds  for  up  to  3  years,  during  which  time  they  pass  through 
a  flightless  phase  (Gill.  1 990:  Marks  el  ai.  1990).  Noflightless 
birds  were  seen. 

Foraging:  We  saw  one  curlew  chase  and  capture  a  small 
Polynesian  rat  at  dusk  on  the  south  shore  of  South  Island.  The 
bird  bashed  the  rat  on  the  coral  rubble,  then  ran  rapidly  about 
with  the  rat  dangling  from  its  bill.  After  about  5  minutes,  the 
bird  swallowed  the  rat  with  vigorous  gulps. 

Polynesian  rats,  abundant  on  Caroline  (especially  in 
Pisonia-  and  Cocas-dominated  habitats),  remain  within  the 
forest  during  the  day.  but  many  move  to  the  beach  crest  and  tide 
line  at  dusk.  They  provide  abundant  potential  prey  for  curlews, 
which  can  easily  capture  them  on  the  open  rubble.  The 
synchronous  appearance  of  rats  and  curlews  at  the  beach- 
woodland  interface  at  dusk  may  be  part  of  the  foraging  strategy 
of  this  large  shorebird.  The  presence  of  curlews  beneath  the 
forest  canopy  may  also  be  partly  associated  w  ith  this  source  of 
food. 

Sanderling  (Crocethia  alba) 

One  sanderling  in  winter  plumage  was  seen  at  water's 
edge  on  the  windward  beach  of  Long  Island  on  27  September 
1988.  Although  Sanderlings  arc  well-known  fall  migrants  in 
the  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands  (Clapp  &  Sibley.  1967,  1968), 
this  is  the  first  record  for  Caroline  Atoll. 


148 


Long-tailed  Cuckoo  (Eudynamis  taitensis)  (Fig.  16) 

The  long-tailed  cuckoo  breeds  in  New  Zealand  and  winters 
in  the  southwest  Pacific.  The  center  of  its  winter  range  lies  in 
central  Polynesia,  but  birds  have  been  recorded  as  far  as  Palau 
in  the  northwest  and  Pitcaim  Island  in  the  southeast.  Although 
occurring  throughout  French  Polynesia  and  the  Cook  Islands, 
it  had  not  been  recorded  from  the  Line  Islands  prior  to  our 
expedition  (Bogert,  1937:  Clapp&  Sibley,  1 97 1  a,b;  Pratt  et  al. , 
1987;  Ellis  etal,  1990). 

We  found  long-tailed  cuckoos  on  4  of  Caroline's  39  motus 
(Fig.  16).  We  heard  its  distinctive  monosyllabic  and  disyllabic 
call  notes  on  South,  Long,  and  Pisonia,  identified  one  on  Nake, 
and  on  28  September  collected  a  male  in  a  mist  net  on  Tr.  4, 
Long  Island  ( USNM  607 191).  Soon  after  our  return  home  we 
sent  a  description  and  photograph  of  this  species  to  the  Falconers: 
they,  and  AKK,  have  since  seen  them  several  times  on  Motu 
Ana- Ana  in  March,  April,  and  May  1989-90. 

All  the  cuckoo  sightings  were  at  canopy  or  subcanopy 
level,  and  three  of  the  four  birds  were  found  in  Pisonia. 
The  South  Island  cuckoo  was  located  in  a  Cocos  canopy  over 
20  m  high.  The  netted  male  flitted  secretively  within  an 
undisturbed,  tangled  low-canopy  (4—6  m)  Pisonia-Tournefortia 
interface.  We  suspect  that  this  elusive  migrant  occurs  throughout 
the  mid-to-upper  levels  of  Caroline's  forest  canopy. 

These  records  establish  the  long-tailed  cuckoo  as  a  winter 
visitor  to  Caroline  Atoll.  Our  observations  on  four  islets, 
including  the  southernmost,  northernmost,  windwards,  and 
leewards,  suggest  that  many  individuals  were  present.  A 
March  1990  first  sighting  on  Vostok  (J.  Phillips,  personal 
communication)  further  suggests  that  the  species  disperses 
regularly  to  the  Southern  Line  Group. 

Other  Vertebrates 

Lizards 

Although  "small  lizards"  were  observed  on  Caroline 
in  1825  (Paulding,  1831),  it  wasn't  until  1965  that  the 
first  collections  were  made  (Clapp  &  Sibley,  1971a).  We 
collected  four  additional  lizard  species,  which  increased  the 
known  terrestrial  herpetofauna  from  three  to  six  (Table  8). 
Although  all  are  indigenous,  the  azure-tailed  skink  (Emoia 
cyanura)  is  suspected  of  being  partly  dispersed  by  man 
(Brown,  1956).  All  but  two  of  the  small  lizard  species  known 
from  the  Line  Islands  (Crombie,  1 990)  have  now  been  found  on 
Caroline. 

Turtles 

We  found  three  Pacific  green  sea  turtles  ( Chelonia  mydas), 
a  threatened  species  (McKeown,  1978),  at  Caroline  in  1988. 
Two  were  swimming  over  the  lagoon  reef  flats,  one  west  of 
Arundel,  the  second  east  of  Ana- Ana.  The  third  was  in  the  open 
sea  about  1 00  m  west  of  South  Island  near  the  "boat  entrance." 
Ron  Falconer  has  seen  up  to  seven  turtles  in  the  lagoon  in  a 
single  day.  In  April  and  May  1990,  AKK  saw  workers  from 
Tahiti  capture  and  kill  a  minimum  of  four  green  turtles  in  the 
lagoon;  two  more  entered  the  lagoon  during  the  following 
4  months  (R.  Falconer,  pesonal  communication). 


In  March  1990,  AKK  and  G.  Wragg  found  three  old  nests, 
presumably  of  this  species,  on  the  northwest  coast  of  Nake 
within  100  m  of  the  northern  tip  of  the  islet.  These  are  the  first 
known  turtle  breeding  records  for  the  atoll.  Young  (ca.  1922) 
notes  that  the  copra  plantation  laborers  ate  green  turtles  from 
September  to  December  each  year.  The  February  1990  storm 
added  large  amounts  of  sand  to  Caroline's  shorelines,  providing 
potential  new  habitat  for  turtle  nesting. 

Terrestrial  Mammals 

None  of  the  terriers  (see  Subchapter  1.1)  that  were 
introduced  to  control  rats  on  South  Island  in  the  early  part  of 
this  century  (Young,  ca.  1922)  have  survived  (F.  Sibley, 
personal  communication;  R.  Falconer,  personal 
communication).  In  May  1990  the  Falconers  kept  a  dog  and  a 
cat  on  Motu  Ana-Ana.  Despite  the  fact  that  both  animals 
generally  remained  close  to  the  settlement,  the  dog  regularly 
visited  the  other  Southern  Leeward  Islets  and  accompanied  the 
family  on  excursions  in  their  sailing  canoe  throughout  the  atoll. 
As  a  result  of  our  recommendations,  the  cat  was  removed  from 
Caroline  in  October  1990.  The  Falconers,  with  their  dog, 
vacated  the  atoll  in  mid- 1991. 

Bennett  ( 1 840)  noted  "rats  of  a  red-brown  color,"  the  first 
reference  to  rodents  on  Caroline.  Dixon  ( 1 884)  found  that  rats 
were  "not  numerous"  and  that  they  nested  "just  at  the  base  of 
the  fronds"  of  the  coconuts.  Two  specimens  collected  by  the 
POBSP  proved  to  be  Rattus  exulans  (Clapp  &  Sibley.  1 97 1  a). 
They  reported  that  rats  were  uncommon  and  restricted  to  South 
Island. 

The  19th  and  20th  century  settlers  found  rats  (presumably 
R.  exulans)  to  be  extremely  abundant  and  very  destructive  to 
the  coconut  plantations.  Maude  (ca.  1938)  states  that  rats 
destroyed  the  nuts,  and  that  they  contributed  greatly  to  the 
eventual  abandonment  of  copra  enterprises  on  Caroline  and 
Flint.  They  voraciously  devoured  both  growing  and  fallen 
nuts,  as  well  as  dried  copra.  Being  arboreal,  they  also  lapped 
the  juices  of  the  flower  stalks,  preventing  nut  development 
(Young,  ca.  1922).  In  a  single  year  ( 1920)  over  4,600  were 
trapped  on  South  Island  (Maude,  ca.  1938).  Thousands  more 
were  killed  by  terriers  introduced  to  Caroline  in  a  vain  attempt 
to  control  them. 

We  found  rats  on  almost  every  islet;  they  were  especially 
abundant  on  South,  Long,  Nake,  and  in  the  vicinity  of  coconut 
palms  on  smaller  islets.  We  recorded  rats  during  daylight  hours 
on  most  transects,  especially  within  the  Pisonia  forests.  At  our 
campsites  on  Long  and  South  we  noticed  groups  of  1 0-20  each 
night,  so  tame  as  to  approach  within  1  m  while  we  were  eating. 
The  rats  evidently  undergo  wide  population  fluctuations,  as 
they  were  less  abundant  in  March  and  May  1990  than  in 
September  1988. 

We  suspect  that  rats  periodically  reach  most  motus,  and 
that  the  islets  apparently  lacking  rats  ( such  as  Noddy  Rock )  are 
too  small  and/or  depauperate  to  support  a  resident  population. 
Because/?.  e.v;</fl/f5isaknown  seabird  predator  (Kepler,  1967; 
Fleet,  1972;  Norman,  1975),  the  restriction  of  some  species 
(i.e.,  red-tailed  tropicbird)  to  small  islets  may  be  due  to  rat 
populations  on  larger  islets. 


149 


We  found  rats  throughout  the  Southern  Leeward  Islets  and 
learned  from  the  Faleoners  that  they  are  an  abundant  nuisance 
on  Ana-Ana.  They  trapped  over  1 .300  animals  in  2  years  and. 
like  the  pioneers  before  them,  rely  upon  a  dog  to  help  keep  them 
at  bay. 

Marine  Mammals 

On  March  14,  1990,  members  of  the  Line  and  Phoenix 
Islands  Expedition  observed  a  minimum  of  1 0  Pacific  bottlenose 
dolphins  (Tursiops  gilli)  in  the  open  sea  about  500  m  off  the 
southeast  corner  of  South  Island. 

Coconut  Crabs 

The  coconut  crab  (Birgus  latro,  Coenobitidae),  the  largest 
terrestrial  invertebrate  on  earth,  ranges  throughout  the  tropical 
Indo-Pacific  (Subchapter  1.1,  PI.  56).  It  is  highly  esteemed  as 
a  source  of  food  throughout  its  range,  and  for  this  reason  is  rare 
or  absent  on  or  near  most  inhabited  islands.  Because  it  is 
heavily  exploited  by  man,  it  is  under  consideration  for 
endangered  species  status  (Reese,  personal  communication). 
Since  March  1990,  dozens  of  Caroline's  coconut  crabs  have 
been  killed  for  food  and  for  preservation  in  formalin  as  curios 
for  the  Tahiti  tourist  market.  Because  of  the  increasing  numbers 
of  visitors  to  Caroline  over  the  past  2  years,  it  is  important  that 
Caroline's  coconut  crabs  receive  protection. 

History:  Young  (ca.  1 922)  was  the  first  to  mention  coconut 
crabs  on  Caroline.  In  1910  he  wrote  that  "hundreds  of  great 
Coconut  Crabs  were  seen:  40  large  ones  were  caught  by  the 
crew  of  the  schooner  in  an  hour"  on  South  Island. 

It  is  hardly  credible  that  these  enormous  crabs,  the  dominant 
terrestrial  animal  of  the  atoll  environment,  could  have  been 
overlooked  by  all  visitors  prior  to  the  20th  century.  Perhaps 
their  populations  had  been  reduced  or  extirpated  by  earlier 
inhabitants.  It  is  of  interest  in  this  regard  that  members  of  the 
1934  Mangarevan  Expedition  saw  no  coconut  crabs  on  nearby 
Flint  Island  ( Fosberg,  personal  communication ),  nor  were  they 
mentioned  in  a  historical  summary  paper  on  Flint  by  Maude 
(ca.  1942b).  Today  Flint  has  perhaps  the  greatest  density  of 
coconut  crabs  in  the  world  (Kepler,  1990b). 

Young  ( ca.  1 922 )  noted  that  coconut  crabs  were  considered 
a  great  nuisance  by  plantation  laborers,  who  killed  them 
mercilessly.  Evidently  the  crabs  dug  up  newly  planted  nuts  and 
snipped  off  emerging  shoots.  On  the  smaller  islets,  visited  less 
frequently  than  South,  Nake,  and  Long,  these  depredations 
were  difficult  to  control.  Thus  the  small  motu  plantations  were 
abandoned  within  a  tew  years  of  initial  planting,  resulting  in  a 
remarkably  rapid  recovery  of  the  original  vegetation  (see 
Subchapter  I.I.  Ecological  Succession  section). 

Distribution  and  Habitat  Preference:  In  1988  and  1990, 
coconut  crabs  were  abundant  in  the  Cocos  plantations  of  South 
and  Nake,  and  present,  in  varying  densities,  on  1 2  other  motus 
(Fig.  18).  Although  generally  associated  with  ( 'ocos,  we  found 
them  in  woodlands  of  Pisonia,  Cordia,  and  Toumefortia,  as 
well  as  on  rubble  beaches  (especiallj  alter  dusk).  Although 
capable  of  survi\  ing  without  coconut  palms,  these  crabs  appear 
to  seek  them  out.  In  the  open  understory  of  the  tall  plantations. 


or  in  groves  of  only  one  or  two  palms,  telltale  piles  of  shredded 
coconut  husk  fibers  (Subchapter  1.1.  PI.  57)  disclosed  the 
crab's  presence. 

Because  the  prevalent  coarse  rubble  substrates  on  Carol  ine 
are  hard  to  burrow  into,  coconut  crabs  occupied  a  variety  of 
shelters:  mounds  of  fallen  coconuts  and  rotting  palm  fronds  ( to 
1.5  m  high),  piles  of  rubble  pushed  against  tree  roots,  sand 
burrows,  tunnels  within  the/<?»  (Subchapter  1.1,  PI.  22),  or 
large  cavities  in  the  boles  of  mature  Pisonia  trees.  Coconut 
crabs  also  use  a  variety  of  shelters  on  the  Tokelau  Islands 
(Yaldwyn  &  Wodzicki.  1979)  and  Flint  (AKK.  personal 
observation). 

Numbers:  Though  conspicuous  and  slow-moving,  coconut 
crabs  are  very  difficult  to  count.  Environmental  variables  such 
as  rainfall,  tide,  lunar  cycle,  and  population  size  and  age  classes 
all  affect  their  activity  (Reese.  1965:  Helfman.  1977a,b). 
Although  unable  to  conduct  mark-recapture  studies,  we  did 
make  incidental  observations  on  the  numbers  of  individuals 
seen  during  transect  and  perimeter  surveys.  Coconut  crabs  are 
generally  nocturnal,  but  we  often  found  them  during  daylight, 
at  times  exposed  on  coral  gravel  beaches  close  to  the  waterline. 
Reese  (personal  communication)  suggests  that  the  abundance 
of  rats  occupying  the  same  habitat  may  "force"  the  crabs  to  be 
more  diurnal,  as  has  been  reported  from  the  Indian  Ocean.  Our 
estimate  of  the  population  on  Caroline  is  approximately 
2, 200  individuals,  based  on  the  number  of  daytime  observations, 
the  area  covered,  and  the  fact  that  only  one  out  of  every  three 
or  four  individuals  may  be  present  on  any  given  night  ( Helfman, 
1977b;  Reese,  1987). 

Foraging:  Since  the  first  detailed  description  of  coconut 
crabs  in  1 705,  their  shy,  curious  habits  have  been  the  subject  of 
folklore,  speculation,  and  misinformation  (see  Reyne.  1939). 
No  scientist  has  yet  published  a  documented  account  of  a 
coconut  crab  actually  opening  a  coconut  (Helfman.  1979), 
which  is  widely  held  to  be  their  consummate  foraging  behavior. 
Helfman  is  convinced  that  they  do  so,  as  he  has  found  piles  of 
coconut  fiber  and  observed  crabs  walking  w  ith  husked,  opened 
nuts  in  places  where  he  was  the  only  other  possible  coconut 
husker.  We  repeat  Helfman's  ( 1979)  assertion  that  coconut 
crabs  do  husk  fallen  coconuts.  The  piles  of  finely  separated 
fibers  (Subchapter  1.1,  PI.  57)  we  encountered  are  totalis 
different  from  those  produced  by  stick  or  machete  husking,  the 
two  methods  commonly  employed  by  Pacific  peoples.  The 
crab  tears  virtually  every  fiber  off  individually,  a  process  so 
painstakingly  slow  it  probably  takes  days.  We  did  not  observe 
this  on  Caroline,  but  in  March  1 990,  AKK.  on  uninhabited  Flint 
Island,  observed  a  large  male  coconut  crab  that  had  just  husked 
a  coconut  and  was  enlarging  a  small  crack  in  the  center  of  the 
smooth  nut  in  a  manner  similar  to  that  described  by  Gardiner 
(1907)  in  Reyne  (1939,  p.  297). 

On  Caroline  we  observed  the  aftermath  of  coconut  crab/ 
sooty  tern  predation  or  scavenging.  On  Brothers  Islet,  several 
entrances  and  pathways  leading  to  coconut  crab  holes  were 
strewn  with  the  feathered  skeleta  of  adult  sooty  terns  (and 
possibly  brown  noddies ),  along  w  ith  numerous,  freshly  snipped 
branches  of  Pisonia  up  to  0.7  m  long  (Subchapter  1.1. 
Description  and  Ecology  of  the  Motus  section).  This  was  also 


150 


recorded  on  Tridacna  Islet  by  Clapp  &  Sibley  (1971a)  for  sooty 
tern  eggs  and  chicks  and  by  Reese  (1987)  and  Helfman  ( 1979) 
on  Enewetak,  Micronesia. 

Size:  Living  in  a  rich  environment  free  of  predators, 
coconut  crabs  attain  huge  sizes  on  Caroline.  The  bodies  of  the 
largest  males  were  as  wide  as  a  full-sized,  unhusked  coconut 
(Subchapter  1.1,  PI.  56),  giving  them  weights  of  at  least  4  k 
(Helfman.  personal  observation).  Thorax  widths  for  10  crabs 
(2  females  with  eggs.  8  males)  averaged  129  mm.  The  thorax 
of  the  largest  male  measured  200  mm  across,  making  it.  along 
with  many  measured  on  Flint  in  1990,  one  of  the  largest 
recorded  coconut  crabs  in  the  world  (the  previous  record  was 
178  mm,  Helfman.  1977a),  with  an  age  estimated  to  exceed 
40  years  (E.  Reese,  personal  communication). 

Conservation:  Attributes  of  International  Significance 

When  Bennett  (1840)  stated  that  "no  reefs  we  had  seen 
could  compete  with  those  of  Caroline  for  novelty  and  beauty," 
he  was  seeing  an  essentially  pristine  ecosystem  through  the 
eyes  of  a  well-traveled  naturalist.  Caroline  is  stunning,  but  its 
value  in  today's  shrinking  world  goes  well  beyond  its  physical 
beauty.  Caroline' s  exceptional  attributes  need  to  be  elucidated, 
for  the  atoll  has  remained  essentially  unknown,  even  to  some 
who  have  evaluated  its  worth  (King,  1973;  Garnett,  1983, 
1984).  Man's  presence  anywhere,  especially  on  pristine  or 
near-pristine  islands,  generally  brings  rapid,  often  irreversible, 
changes.  There  are  few,  if  any,  islands  remaining  in  the  Pacific 
that  can  claim  the  impressive  array  of  natural  features  exhibited 
by  Caroline  (Nicholson  &  Douglas,  1969).  We  believe  that  it 
is  imperative  that  this  atoll,  which  has  managed  to  escape  large- 
scale  human  disturbance,  should  remain  undeveloped. 

Caroline  was  inhabited  from  1988  to  1991  by  a  single 
family  who  lived  a  spartan,  ecologically  sound  lifestyle.  There 
are  no  roads,  vehicles,  stores,  jetties,  or  services  (water,  sewage, 
or  food),  and  no  communication.  There  is  no  passage  into  the 
lagoon  or  safe  sea  anchorage. 

One  of  the  most  important  of  Caroline's  attributes  is  its 
relative  lack  of  disturbance.  Aside  from  obvious  human 
impacts  on  South.  Nake.  and  Ana-Ana,  the  majority  of  its 
motus  are  dominated  by  indigenous  vegetation  and  its  reefs  are 
basically  pristine.  There  is  no  obvious  pollution  to  alter  the 
chemistry  of  the  lagoon,  beyond  the  flotsam  and  jetsam  that 
spatter  the  windward  beaches.  It  is  thus  an  exceptionally  clear 
and  clean  ecological  laboratory  that  presents  a  picture  of 
lagoon  ecosystems  "before"  extensive  disturbance  by  man.  and 
one  that  provides  the  marine  biologist  with  an  unparalleled 
opportunity  to  study  undisturbed  natural  communities.  The 
atoll  is  rich  in  marine  vertebrates  and  invertebrates;  the  maze 
of  reefs  and  coral  heads  in  the  lower  half  of  the  lagoon  has  the 
highest  recorded  density  of  living  Tridacna  (20/. 25  m2)  ever 
recorded  ( Sirenko  &  Koltun.  Subchapter  1 .4.  this  volume),  one 
of  the  few  undisturbed  world  populations  of  this  species 
(Subchapter  1.1.  PI.  26). 

Caroline's  many  islets  of  different  sizes  provide  excellent 
examples  of  soil  and  vegetation  development,  accompanied  by 
variations  in  the  diversity  of  bird  life  (Fig.  17).   Many  of  its 


disturbed  islets  have  recovered  so  remarkably  they  are  almost 
indistinguishable  from  those  which  have  remained  pristine. 
The  changing  shapes  of  the  islets,  bearing  emerging  and  mature 
plant  communities,  graphically  portray  a  natural  terrestrial 
atoll  ecosystem.  Caroline's  concentric  pattern  of  plant 
community  development  and  the  relationships  of  these 
communities  to  islet  size,  shape,  and  location  on  the  atoll  rim 
will  continue  to  provide  insight  into  evolutionary  processes  on 
atolls  if  they  are  left  undisturbed. 

Caroline's  insular  flora,  typical  of  central  equatorial  islands 
in  their  natural  state  and  covering  70%  of  the  atoll's  land  area, 
is  of  both  national  and  international  importance.  The  27  extant 
plant  species  are  85%  indigenous  (possibly  up  to  93%),  an 
extremely  high  figure  for  anywhere  in  the  world.  Six  of  the 
seven  plant  communities  are  natural.  Lushly  wooded,  Caroline 
possesses  some  of  the  largest  and  grandest  Pisonia  (Pisonia 
grandis)  forests  known  (Subchapter  1.1,  PI.  43),  occurring  on 
29  islets.  Although  not  as  majestic  as  the  prime  forests  on 
Washington  and  Fanning  (Northern  Line  Group),  which  enjoy 
a  heavier  rainfall,  those  on  Caroline  are  some  of  the  finest 
representatives  of  this  forest  community  in  the  entire  Pacific. 
The  62  ha  of  Pisonia  forest  may  well  cover  a  larger  area  than 
on  any  other  Pacific  atoll. 

Caroline  possesses  significant  stands  of  the  hardwood  kou 
(Cordia  subcordata),  a  tree  that  is  now  rare  in  the  Pacific. 
Caroline's  groves  (Subchapter  1.1,  PI.  27),  though  small  and 
often  occurring  in  mixed  native  woodlands,  total  26  ha.  possibly 
the  greatest  area  on  any  Pacific  atoll.  Its  extensive  coverage  of 
tree  heliotrope  (Tournefortia  argentea)  is  also  notable:  scrub 
and  forests  of  this  species  form  40%  of  the  atoll  woodlands 
(Subchapter  1.1.  PI.  47).  Caroline's  groves  are  some  of  the 
most  unmodified  in  the  Pacific:  elsewhere  Tournefortia  is 
typically  restricted  to  coastal  fringes  surrounding  anthropogenic 
plantations  (R.  Fosberg.  personal  communication). 

Caroline  offers  many  opportunities  for  ecological  research 
under  reasonably  pristine  conditions.  Valuable  clues  as  to  the 
nature  of  underground  water  supplies  may  lead  to  a  better 
understanding  of  the  regulation  of  water  supplies  on  inhabited 
islands.  Marine  biological  and  biomedical  research  could 
unearth  clues  as  to  the  causes  and  treatment  of  ciguatoxicity  of 
fishes  and  crabs.  Such  topics  are  increasingly  important  as 
more  islands  are  subjected  to  disturbance  and  pollution.  For 
example,  the  abundant  red  snapper  (Lutjanus  vaigiensis)  and 
red  spotted  crab  (Carpilius  maculatus),  both  of  which  are 
notorious  for  their  potent  poisons,  are  safe  to  eat  on  Caroline. 
Associated  with  Caroline's  plant  communities  are 
1 1  species  of  breeding  seabirds  numbering  well  in  excess  of 
1,000,000  individuals.  The  populations  of  most  of  these 
species  are  of  national  importance  (Table  9).  Caroline  has  the 
fifth  largest  red-footed  booby  colony  (Subchapter  1.1,  PI.  51) 
in  the  world.  Its  black  noddy  and  white  tern  (PI.  3)  populations 
are  the  largest  in  Kiribati.  Under  the  1975  Republic  of  Kiribati 
Wildlife  Conservation  Ordinance  (amended  in  1979).  all 
known  seabirds,  migrant  shorebirds.  and  endemic  land  birds 
are  "fully  protected  throughout  the  Gilbert  Islands"  (Garnett, 
1983,  p.  128).  However,  their  protected  status  is  in  doubt  on 
Caroline,  due  to  attempts  to  lease  the  island  for  development. 


151 


Caroline  deserves  protection  similar  to  five  closed  areas  on 
Christmas  Island  and  seven  island  sanctuaries  in  the  Line  and 
Phoenix  Groups  (Garnett,  1983). 

Caroline  is  an  important  wintering  ground  for  the  bristle- 
thighed  curlew,  a  rare  shorebird  and  candidate  for  the  US  Fish 
&  Wildlife  Service  Endangered  Species  list.  Some  subadults 
remain  all  year  on  the  atoll.  Adult  curlews  pass  through  a 
flightless  phase  on  Pacific  islands,  and  Caroline  provides  a 
predator-free  environment  for  this  vulnerable  phase  of  the 
curlew's  life  history. 

Caroline  is  exceptional  in  harboring  a  robust  population  of 
coconut  crabs  (Subchapter  1.1,  Pis.  22,  56).  These  large 
invertebrates  are  abundant  in  the  Cocos  plantations  of  South 
and  Nake  and  are  found  in  good  numbers  in  the  indigenous 
Pisonia  forests  on  most  of  Caroline's  larger  motus. 

Although  green  turtles  are  not  abundant  on  the  atoll, 
worldwide  populations  of  these  marine  reptiles  have  suffered 
so  greatly  from  overexploitation  that  remote,  predator-free 
islands  such  as  Caroline  provide  important,  though  small, 
sanctuaries.  Since  1978  the  Pacific  green  sea  turtle  has  been 
reclassified  by  the  United  States  Department  of  the  Interior  as 
threatened  and  the  Pacific  hawksbill  sea  turtle  as  endangered. 

From  an  archaeological  point  of  view,  Caroline  houses 
one  intact  Tuamotuan  marae  ( ancient  religious  site)  and  another 
smaller  site,  partly  destroyed  by  storms.  The  main  site 
(Subchapter  1.1,  Fig.  3,  PI.  36),  basically  undisturbed  since  the 
1 870'  s,  is  a  relic  of  prehistoric  occupation  worthy  of  protection, 
being  the  only  one  of  its  kind  in  the  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands. 

Currently  Caroline  Atoll  is  owned  by  the  government  of 
the  Republic  of  Kiribati  and  does  not  enjoy  any  legal  protection 
(Garnett,  1983;  Government  of  Kiribati,  personal 
communication).  Over  the  last  50  years  it  has  been  leased  to 
private  individuals  who  have  scarcely  altered  the  atoll.  The 
benign  management  of  the  past  is  no  guarantee  for  the  future, 
and  from  October  1989  to  the  present,  pressures  to  develop  the 


atoll  have  mounted  rapidly.  Proposed  schemes  included  an 
airstrip,  a  blasted  channel  through  the  reef,  a  hotel,  a  casino, 
logging,  and  commercial  harvest  offish  and  lobsters.  In  March 
1990,  commercial  harvesting  of  fish,  the  taking  of  coconut 
crabs,  and  illegal  killing  of  green  turtles  began,  emphasizing 
that  no  island,  however  remote,  is  guaranteed  protection  through 
isolation.  In  addition,  during  the  past  2  years  Caroline  has 
become  more  visited  than  ever  before,  mostly  without  the 
knowledge  or  consent  of  the  Kiribati  government. 

There  are  many  reasons  why  Caroline  is  inappropriate  for 
resident  tourists  or  development  (remoteness,  distance  from 
medical  aid,  no  regular  water  supply,  no  passage  into  the 
lagoon,  etc.;  see  Kepler.  1990a).  Caroline  could  support  a 
limited  number  of  ship-based  ecotourists  each  year. 

Recommendations  for  an  international  preserve  began  in 
January  1989.  During  the  1990  ICBP  expedition  to  the  Line 
Islands,  the  team  leaders  discussed  conservation  matters  with 
Kiribati  government  officials  and  key  scientists  in  French 
Polynesia.  Fortunately,  documentation  was  obtained  of  illegal 
land  clearing  and  wildlife  disturbance  during  two  visits  to 
Caroline  (Kepler,  1990a,b,c).  The  Kiribati  government  is 
considering  altering  their  plans  for  the  development  of  Caroline 
in  favor  of  wildlife  preservation.  During  summer  1990,  French 
customs  officials  in  Tahiti  temporarily  banned  the  exploitation 
of  Caroline  by  French  Polynesian  nationals. 

As  of  December  1 990,  The  Nature  Conservancy  of  Hawaii 
has  restated  its  interest  in  establishing  a  triple-island  preserve 
on  Caroline,  Vostok,  and  Flint  and  has  begun  discussions  with 
the  Kiribati  government  on  Tarawa.  The  fate  of  these  special 

islands  may  rest  upon  the  results  of  these  negotiations. 

We  have  a  number  of  people  to  thank  for  their  assistance  in  this 
project;  however,  our  acknowledgments  for  Parts  1  and  2  of  the 
manuscript.  Ecological  Studies  of  Caroline  Atoll.  Republic  of 
Kirabati.  South-central  Pacific  Ocean  are  listed  at  the  conclusion  of 
Part  1 .  and  are  not  repeated  here.  Again,  it  is  our  sincere  pleasure  to 
(hank  these  individuals. 


152 


TABLE  1 


Estimated  number  of  breeding  seabird  pairs  on  Caroline  Atoll,  September  1988. 


Location 

Nake 
Long 
Windward  Islets 

Bo'sun  Bird 

Windward 

Crescent 

Atibu 

North  Pig 

Pig 

Skull 

North  Brothers 

Brothers 

Noddy  Rock 

North  Arundel 

Arundel 

Tridacna 
South 
South  Nake  Islets 

Pandanus 

Danger 

Booby 

Coral 

Lone  Palm 

Kota 

Mouakena 
Central  Leeward  Islets 

Mannikiba 

Blackfin 

Matawa 

Emerald 

Shark 

Scarlet  Crab 

Nautonga 

Azure 

Reef-flat 

Bird 

Fishball 
Southern  Leeward  Islets 

Raurau 

Eitei 

Pisonia 

Kimoa 

Ana-Ana 


Red-tailed    Masked   Brown  Red-footed     Great  Lesser    Sooty 

Tropicbird     Booby    Booby      Booby    Frigatebird    Frigatebird  Tern 


5 
47 


105 
69 


25 


496 

522 

659 

808 

163 

207 

28 

5 

31 

17 

14 

118 

25 

9 

* 

* 

37 

* 

111 

- 

32 

26 

139 

- 

52 

- 

28 

2 

48 

- 

12 

1 

8 

- 

184 

287 

* 

4 

5 

1 

3 

230 

* 

118 

11 

2 

7 

2 

29 


10 

31 

17 

14 

26 

14 

21 

3 

56 


Brown    Black    Blue-gray    White 
Noddy  Noddy       Noddy      Tern 


1,094 
751 


- 

390 

814 

179,800 

207 

986 

8,400 

10 

_ 

- 

20 

28 

- 

36 

60 

_ 

76 

3.194 

- 

82 

1,928 

_ 

23 

40 

- 

8 

15 

- 

80 

- 

_ 

11 

249 

- 

11 

230 

- 

163 

- 

_ 

26 

_ 

- 

33 

33 

- 

2 

1 

- 

6 

- 

161 

176 

37 

- 

3 

- 

7 

150 

37 

125 

7 

32 

42 

329 

5 

- 

6 
134 


110 
164 

69 

50 


227 
396 

381 

52 
37 
6 
15 
9 
3 


195 
11 
13 
83 
44 
2 

10 

2 

48 


Total  Estimated 
Pairs 


56 


189 


2,427 


56   188,200  1,491  8,392 


3,957 


Breeding  confirmed  in  1989  or  1990. 


153 


TABLE  2 

Stages  in  the  breeding  cycle  of  the  red-tailed 

tropicbird,  Caroline  Atoll,  27-29  September  1988 

(ages  after  Stonehouse,  1962). 


Approximate  Age  in 
Nest  Stage  Days  From  Laying        No.  Nests 


Juv. 

90-133 

18 

Remiges 

69-89 

4 

Scapulars 

58-68 

5 

Downy 

44-57 

6 

Egg 

0-43 

21 

Pairs  on 

Territory 

- 

2 

TABLE  3 

Stages  in  the  breeding  cycle  of  the  boobies  of  Caroline  Atoll, 
21-29  September  1988. 


Nest  stage'/Approximate  age  in  days  from  laying 


Flying  Pairs  on 

Species  Juv.  Juv.      Scapulars    Remiges     Downy    Naked     Eggs     Territory 


Masked  >164       145-164      115-144      89-114 

Brown  >  1 64      144-164     114-144      88-114 

Red-footed  -  >150       111-150      75-110 


55-88  45-54  0-44 
54-88  44-54  0-44 
54-74     45-53      0-45 


No.  nests  in  each  stase 


Masked 

Brown 

Red-footed 


40 


many 


38 

4 

33 

34 

- 

- 

3 

8 

29 

- 

919 

1.270 

For  descriptions  of  nest  stage,  see  C.  B.  Kepler  ( 1978). 


TABLE  4 

Density  of  red-footed  booby  nests  in  occupied  Toumefortia  habitats  on 
islet  groups,  Caroline  Atoll.  September  1988. 


Islet  Group 


Number  Estimated  Area  of        Nests/1.000  nr 

Occupied  Number  Toumefortia      of  Available 

Islets  Nests  (nr)  Habitat 


Nake 

1 

496 

300,650 

1.6 

Long 

1 

659 

322.000 

2.0 

Windward  Islets 

8 

434 

25 1 ,900 

1.7 

South  Nake  Islets 

7 

319 

59,801) 

5.3 

Central  Leewards 

6 

239 

197,500 

1.2 

Southern  Leewards 

4 

74 

39.600 

1.9 

rotal 

27 

2,221 

1.170,550 

1.9 

154 


TABLE  5 

Stages  in  the  breeding  cycle  of  frigatebirds  on  Caroline  Atoll. 
21-29  September  1988. 

Nest  stage/Approximate  age  in  days  from  laying 


Species 

Juv. 

Primaries    Scaps.       Downy      Naked 

Eggs 

Great 
Lesser 

191-220 
181-210 

101-190    81-100      (56-80)a    (56-80)3 
91-180     71-90         56-70       46-55 

No.  nests  in  each  stage 

0-55 
0-45 

Great 

Lesser 

22 

4 

46           27              (        30J       ) 
13             4               5               0 

19 
0 

Duration  of  naked  and  downy  chick  stages  are  lumped  because  it  was  often 
impossible  to  see  into  canopy  nests. 


Colony  Location 


Long  Island,  A 


Long  Island.  1  N 


Long  Island.  1  S 


TABLE  6 

Sooty  tern  colonies  on  Caroline  Atoll.  27-28  September  1988. 

Calculated 

Population  Nest         Approx.  Weeks 

Area        (Mean  Pairs  ±  SE)  Stage  From  Laying 


44,100  m:     127,449  ±30.429       hatching  eggs,  4-5 

downy  chicks 

24,200m2      41,382  ±  5,808  chicks  with  7-10 

short  tails, 
juv.  plumage 

6,400  nr        10.9441   1.536  "  7-10 


Bo"sun  Biid  Islet, 
old 
new 

Total 


3,375  m:        6,883  ±  1,575  fledglings 

3,375  m2         1,538  ±     758  new  eggs 

75,075  nr     188.196  ±40.106 


11-12 
1-9 


TABLE  7 

Density  of  white  terns  on  occupied  islets  by  islet  group,  Caroline 
Atoll.  September  1988. 


#  White 

Density 

# 

Vegetated 

tern 

(pairs/ 

Islet  Group 

Islets 

Area  (ha) 

Pairs 

1,000  nr) 

Nake 

1 

66.63 

1,094 

1.64 

Long 

1 

49.60 

751 

1.51 

South 

1 

86.10 

381 

0.43 

Windward  Islets 

9 

36.09 

1,164 

3.23 

South  Nake  Islets 

6 

8.50 

122 

1.44 

Central  Leeward  Islets 

9 

33.56 

408 

1.22 

Southern  Leeward  Islets 

4 

6.47 

37 

0.57 

All  Occupied  Islets 


31 


286.88 


3,957 


1.38 


155 


TABLE  8 

Lizards  collected  on  Caroline  Atoll,  1965-1988. 
Specimens: 


Species 


Clapp  &  Sibley  1 97 1  a     Present  Study 


Mourning  gecko 

Lepidodactylus  lugubris 
Polynesian  gecko 

Gehyra  oceanica 
Snake-eyed  skink 

Cryptoblepharus  poecilopleurus 
Moth  skink 

Lipinia  noctua' 

Emoia  impar 
Azure-tailed  skink 
Emoia  cyanura 


USNM  158355-57 
USNM  158353-54 

USNM  158358 


USNM  299773 
USNM  299772 

USNM  299768-70 

USNM  299771 


1  USNM  158358  has  recently  been  reidentit'ied  by  R.I.  Crombie  as  Lipinia 
noctua.  not  Emoia  nigra,  as  reported  in  Clapp  &  Sibley  (1971a). 


TABLE  9 


Species 


Comparative  abundance  of  Caroline's  breeding  seabirds  in  the  Line  Group. 

Estimated  Population         Comparative  Abundance  in  the  Line  Group 


Red-tailed  tropicbird 

300  ' 

Masked  booby 

400 

Brow  n  boobv 

40 

Red-looted  boobv 

7.000 

Great  frigatebird 

6.1(H) 

lesser  frigatebird 

200+ 

Sooty  tern 

912.000 

Brovwi  noddv 

3.000 

Black  noddy 

17.000 

Blue-gray  nodd) 

<10 

White  tern 

8.000 

Second  largest  population 
Fourth  largest  population 
Third  largest  population 
Third  largest  population 
Third  largest  population 

Third  largest  population 
Third  largest  population 
Largest  population  (largest  mi  Kiribati) 

Largest  population  (largest  in  Kiribati) 


'  Based  upon  nest  count  in  1990. 


156 


BROWN  BOOBY 
RED-TAILED  TROPICBIRD 


WINDWARO 
ISLETS 


Fig.  1.  Caroline  Atoll,  Republic  of  Kiribati,  with  newly-named  islets. 
RED    TAILED    TROPICBIRD     1988 


22  - 
20  - 
18  - 


CAROLINE   ATOLL 


Fig.  2.  Distribution  map  of  breeding  red-tailed  tropicbirds  and  brown 
boobies  on  Caroline  Atoll.  September  1988.  In  this  and  the  following 
distribution  maps,  arrows  indicate  concentrations  of  breeding  birds. 


a 

z 


0) 

< 

a. 

o 

z 


16 
14 
12 

10 


uveniles 


primaries 


scap 


downy 


eggs 


1.0 


0.5 


>- 
< 

Q 

a. 

LU 
0. 


CO 
LU 

X 

u 


o 
6 


160 


APRIL 


140 

MAY 


120 


100      80 

60 

40 

JUNE         JULY 

AUG. 

NO. DAYS 

20 

SEPT. 


Fig.  3.  Approximate  laying  dates  for  red-tailed  tropicbird  nests  found  on  Caroline  Atoll  in  September  1988.  In  this  and  the  following  similar  figures  the  numbers 
of  nests  begun  during  a  given  time  period  (bars)  were  determined  by  tallying  each  nest  into  one  of  several  age  classes  (bar  labels):  bar  widths  indicate 
length  in  days  for  each  class.  The  dotted  line  connects  mean  number  of  surviving  clutches  begun  per  day  for  each  class.  For  example,  a  juvenile  found 
in  September  began  its  egg  stage  in  the  previous  May  or  June.  The  number  of  days  are  counted  backwards  from  field  observations. 

157 


MASKED   BOOBY 


50%  of  population 


CAROLINE   ATOLL 


SCALE   i    .14  ooo 
100  O  too      1000 

'■••■' I I l_ 


MASKED    BOOBY      1988 

9) 

40 

~~"\ 

- 

/ 

i 

\ 

- 

/ 

\ 

32 

/ 

24 

/ 

„ 

,'    *ggs 
_i 1 

z 

> 
< 
■J      16 

s 

/ 

rer 

iiges 

< 

Q. 

o       . 

scapulars 
■                    ' 

0 

180  160 

APRIL 


140  120  100  80  60  40 

MAY  JUNE  JULY  AUG. 


Fig.  4.   Distribution  map  of  breeding  masked  boobies  on  Caroline  Atoll, 
September  1988. 


Fig.  5.   Approximate  laying  dates  for  masked  booby  nests  found  on  Caroline 
Atoll  in  September  1988. 


RED- FOOTED  BOO 


ROLINE    ATOLL 


Fig  'i    Distribution  map  oi  breeding  red  footed  boobies  on  Caroline  Atoll,        Fig.  7.    Approximate  laying  datesfoi  red  footed  boob)  nests  foundonCaroline 
September  1988  Atoll  in  September  1988 


158 


■    GREAT    FRIGATEBIR 
►       LESSER   FRIGATEBIRD 


Fig.  8.   Distribution  map  of  breeding  great  and  lesser  frigatebirds  on  Caroline 
Atoll,  September  1988. 


50 


40 


30 


-i     20 

</> 

IT 

< 

a. 

6      10 

z 


juveniles 


primaries 


GREAT   FRIGATEBIRD        1988 


scaps 


naked/ 
downy 


_l_ 


eggs 


220  200  180  160 

FEB.  MARCH  APRIL 


140 

120 

100 

MAY 

JUNE 

NO. DAYS 

80  60 

JULY 


40 

AUG. 


20  o 

SEPT. 


Fig.  9.    Approximate  laying  dates  for  great  frigatebird  nests  found  on  Caroline  Atoll  in  September  1988.  See  Figure  3  for  explanation. 

159 


15 


10 


o 

z 


< 


LESSER     FRIGATEBIRD       1988 


u  veni  les 


primaries 


scaps 


down 


220- 
FEB 


200 

MARCH 


180  160 

APRIL 


140 

MAY 


120  100 

JUNE 


80  60 

JULY 


40 

AUG. 


20  0 

SEPT. 


NO    DAYS 

Fig.  10.    Approximate  laying  dates  for  lesser  frigatebird  nests  found  on  Caroline  Atoll  in  September  lc 


9    MAR    89 


OMARS  MAY   90 


'SEP  86.  •  89  & 

AR  90.  -*  MAY  90  IN  -31 

*r  SEP  88.  •  FEB  89  4  MAY  90 


#MAR89,-^MAY89IN=3I 


•  *  "JUN  65,   O   MAY  90 
IN  =31 


juveniles 
N     number   of  colonies 


BO'  SUN  BIRD 

•  •*  SEP  88  IN  =  2I 


O  AUG  894  MAY  90 
O  AUG  894MAY  90 
-'  :  JUN  65  ,°  AUG  89  IN     4 

CAROLINE    ATOLL 


0  MO      l«*0  1NO 

J I I I  ' 


SOOTY    TERN     1988 


BO  SUN 
BIRD 


LONG  IS 

"a" 


L2 


Fig.  1 1.  Distribution  mapofbreeding  sooty  ternsonCaroline Atoll, September         Fig.  12.  Approximate  lasing  dales  for  sooty  tern  young  found  on  Caroline 
1988-July  1990..  Atoll  in  September  1988.  See  Figure  3  for  explanation. 


160 


BROWN    NODDY 


BLACK   NODDY 


CAROLINE    ATOLL 


CAROLINE    ATOLL 


Fig.  13.  Distribution  map  of  breeding  brown  noddies  on  Caroline  Atoll 
September  1988. 


Fig.  14.  Distribution  map  of  breeding  black  noddies  on  Caroline  Atoll, 
September  1988. 


LONG-TAILED  CUCKOO 


Fig.  15.  Distribution  mapol  breeding  white  terns  on  Caroline  Atoll.  September         Fig.  16.  Tentative  distribution  map  of  the  long-tailed  cuckoo  on  Caroline 
1988.  Atoll.  The  species  most  likely  utilizes  all  well-wooded  islets 


161 


SEABIRD   BREEDING 
SPECIES    DIVERSITY 


COCONUT    CRAB 


CAROLINE    ATOLL 


5C»l€ 

BO             0 

900 

1 

1              1 

,000 

CAROLINE    ATOLL 


Fig.  17.  Seabird  breeding  species  diversity  by  islet.  Caroline  Atoll. 


Fig.  18.  Distribution  map  of  coconut  crabs  on  Caroline  Atoll. 


162 


PI.  1 .      Incubating  red-tailed  tropicbird,  Bo'sun  Bird  Islet,  Caroline  Atoll,  25  September  1 988.  The  nest  scrape  is  in  fine  coral  rubble  under 
a  Toumefortia  shrub. 


PI.  2.      Masked  booby  adult  with  egg  on  coarse  coral  rubble  substrate  with  Portulaca  mat.  Nake  Island.  Caroline  Atoll, 
26  September  1988. 


163 


PI.  3.      White  lern  adult  with  egg  in  typical  nest  site,  a  dead  Ttmrmforiia  branch.  South  Island.  Caroline  Atoll.  23  September  1988. 


164 


1.3     First  Records  of  the  Long-tailed  Cuckoo 
(Eudynamis  taitensis)  on  Caroline  Atoll, 
Southern  Line  Islands,  Republic  of  Kiribati 

DAVID  H.  ELLIS  .  CAMERON  B.  KEPLER,  ANGELA  K.  KEPLER*,  and  KATINO  TEEB'AKI 
US  Fish  &  Wildlife  Service.  Patuxent  Wildlife  Research  Center,  Laurel,  Maryland,  USA 

US  Fish  &  Wildlife  Service,  Patuxent  Wildlife  Research  Center,  Southeast  Research  Station,  Athens,  Georgia,  USA 
Wildlife  Conservation  Unit,  Christinas  Island,  Republic  of  Kiribati 


Introduction 

The  long-tailed  cuckoo  {Eudynamis  taitensis)  performs 
what  is  perhaps  the  most  remarkable  overwater  migration  of 
any  land  bird  (Lack.  1959).  It  breeds  in  New  Zealand  and  is 
known  to  winter  in  the  islands  of  the  central  Pacific  Ocean,  with 
stragglers  seen  as  far  as  Palau  to  the  west  and  Pitcaim  to  the  east 
(Bogert.  1937).  Although  the  Line  Islands  are  along  the 
northeastern  perimeter  of  this  range,  the  cuckoo  has  never  been 
reported  for  the  Line  or  Phoenix  Islands  (Pratt  etai,  1987).  In 
1883.  when  Dixon  (1884)  visited  Caroline  Atoll  (10°S.  150°W) 
at  the  southeastern  end  of  the  Line  Islands,  he  reported  that  a 
colleague  had  heard  "the  notes  of  a  singing  bird."  but  no  land 
bird  was  collected.  In  June  1965,  biologists  from  the  Pacific 
Ocean  Biological  Survey  Program  visited  Caroline  Atoll  but 
failed  to  detect  land  birds  (Clapp  &  Sibley.  1971 ). 

We  encountered  the  long-tailed  cuckoo  on  four  islets 
during  our  22-29  September  1988  survey  of  all  39  islets  of 
Caroline  Atoll  as  part  of  a  research  team  from  the  Soviet 
oceanographic  research  vessel  Akademik  Korolev.  Harsh 
monosyllabic  or  disyllabic  call  notes,  presumably  of  this  species, 
were  first  heard  on  three  islets:  South.  Pisonia.  and  Long  (see 
Kepler  et  a/.,  Subchapter  1.1.  this  volume,  for  islet  locations). 
Then,  on  25  September,  a  single  bird,  probably  of  this  species, 
was  heard  and  briefly  seen  on  South  Island.  On  26  September, 
an  individual  was  positively  identified  (CBK;  ca.  25  m;  xlO 
binoculars)  on  Nake  Island. 

In  an  attempt  to  capture  this  species,  or  any  other 
undiscovered  land  bird,  we  operated  mist  nets  at  three  locations 
on  the  atoll.  In  14.5  net  hours  (daylight  hours  only;  ATX 
4-shelf  nets.  2.6  x  12  m;  mesh  size  36  mm)  beneath  a  10-15  m 
Cocos  canopy  on  South  Island,  only  a  single  bristle-thighed 
curlew  (Numenius  tahitiensis)  was  captured.  On  Long  Island 
two  nets  along  a  Pisonia-Cocos  interface  (canopy  at  6-8  m) 
were  unsuccessful  in  27.5  net  hours.  Finally,  on  28  September 


we  collected  a  male  long-tailed  cuckoo  on  Long  (US  National 
Museum  No.  607191)  in  1.5  net  hours  along  a  Pisonia- 
TournefortialCordia  interface  with  a  short  canopy  (4-6  m) 
where  two  of  us  ( AKK,  KT)  had  heard  and  followed  a  cuckoo- 
sized  land  bird  for  about  20  minutes  the  day  before. 

The  following  measurements  of  the  specimen  were  taken 
immediately  after  collection:  mass  125  g,  length  411  mm 
(central  rectrices  still  growing  so  measurement  was  to  the  tip  of 
the  worn  rectrices  adjacent  to  central  rectrices).  culmen 
25.4  mm,  and  wing  chord  179  mm.  Soft  part  colors  within 
30  minutes  of  death,  compared  with  Smithe's  ( 1 975 )  color  key, 
were  ridge  of  bill.  No.  219  Sepia;  lateral  margin  of  bill,  No.  86 
Pale  Neutral  Gray;  lower  mandible,  No.  53  Buff-yellow;  iris. 
No.  124  Buff;  foot  pad,  No.  153  Trogon  Yellow;  and  dorsal 
surface  of  foot  and  tarsus.  No.  150  Bunting  Green. 

These  records  establish  the  long-tailed  cuckoo  as  a 
winter  visitor  to  the  Line  Islands.  Since  our  1988  visit,  we 
learned  from  correspondence  and  personal  discussions  with 
the  atoll's  only  human  inhabitants  and  wardens,  Ronald  and 
Anne  Falconer,  that  cuckoos  occasionally  occurred  in 
April.  1989,  near  their  dwelling  on  Motu  Ana-Ana.  the 
southernmost  leeward  islet.  This  was  confirmed  by  AKK  with 
further  sightings  on  two  subsequent  trips  to  Caroline  in  March 
and  May  1990  (Kepler.  1990).  Our  original  observations  at 
five  widely  scattered  locations  (the  most  distant  were  9  km 
apart)  suggested  that  several  individuals  were  present  on  the 
atoll  during  our  visit.  Subsequent  observations  suggest  that 
this  species  disperses  regularly  to  Caroline  Atoll  and  perhaps 
some  others  of  the  better-vegetated  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands 
as  well. 

We  are  pleased  to  thank  Mr.  Harold  J.  O'Connor  and  Mr.  Steve 
Kohl  (US  Fish  &  Wildlife  Service)  and  Professor  Alia  V.  Tsyban 
(Goskomgidromet.  USSR )  for  organizing  the  Third  Joint  US-USSR 
Bering  &  Chukchi  Seas  Expedition  that  made  these  observations 
possible. 


165 


1.4     A  Study  of  the  Benthic  Communities  of 

Caroline  Atoll  (Line  Islands,  Pacific  Ocean) 


BORIS  I.  SIRENKO  and  VLADIMIR  M.  KOLTUN 

Zoological  Institute,  USSR  Academy  of  Sciences,  Leningrad,  USSR 


Introduction 

The  study  of  coral  atolls,  which  constitute  one  of  the  most 
highly  productive  biological  systems  in  oligotrophic  tropical 
waters,  is  of  considerable  theoretical  and  practical  value.  On 
one  hand,  rapid  human  population  growth  over  the  past  few 
decades,  with  the  concomitant  shortage  of  protein-rich  foods, 
has  driven  a  never-ending  search  for  new  protein  sources.  The 
study  of  coral  reefs  as  highly  productive  biological  systems 
would  be  helpful  for  establishing  marine  farming  facilities.  On 
the  other  hand,  burgeoning  industrialization  and  the  increasingly 
intensive  use  of  all  natural  systems  has  caused  considerable 
damage  to  coral  reefs  (Gomez  &  Yap,  1985).  There  is, 
therefore,  an  urgent  need  for  coral  reef  monitoring.  Uninhabited 
Caroline  Atoll,  situated  far  from  principal  sea  routes,  would  be 
considered  an  excellent  monitoring  site.  With  this  in  mind,  we 
spent  a  week  studying  the  status  of  the  coral  reefs  and  surveying 
the  benthic  communities  around  South  Island  and  the  Southern 
Leeward  Islands  ( Kepler  e t  al. ,  Subchapter  1 . 1 ,  this  volume )  in 
Caroline  Atoll  (Fig.  1 ).  Regrettably,  time  constraints  did  not 
permit  a  study  of  sufficient  scope  and  depth.  The  present  paper 
is  therefore  limited  to  a  general  description  of  benthos 
distribution  in  the  accessible  portions  of  the  reef  and  to  an 
account  of  a  uniquely  interesting  reef  situated  within  the  atoll 
lagoon. 

At  low  tide,  the  Caroline  Atoll  Lagoon  is  linked  to  the 
ocean  by  shallow  passes  of  no  greater  than  0.5  m  in  depth. 
Several  narrow  intralagoonal  reefs  subdivide  the  central  lagoon 
at  low  tide.  The  depth  of  the  lagoon  does  not  exceed  10  m.  The 
largely  sandy  bottom  includes  isolated  patches  of  fragile  coral 
colonies,  mostly  Acropora. 

With  few  exceptions,  the  outer  side  of  the  reef  near  the 
southern  islands  has  the  classical  structure  of  most  coral  reefs 
(Preobrazhenskiy,  1986).  The  narrow  shallow-water  lagoon 
facing  the  islands  gradually  becomes  a  reef  flat  cemented  by 
encrusted  calcareous  algae.  This  is  rather  extensive,  averaging 
562  m:  range  396-759,  N  =  100  sites  (Kepler  et  al.. 
Subchapter  1.1,  this  volume).  The  reef  Oat  is  surmounted  by 
widely  spread  limestone  coral  knolls  or  "coral  heads."  Further 
seaward,  the  reef  flat,  with  the  usual  channels  and  overhanging 
ledges,  breaks  off.  At  a  depth  of  5-6  m  it  becomes  a  buttress 
zone  (i.e.,  a  radically  crosscut  sloping  terrace  consisting  of 
individual  spurs  or  benches  that  become  narrower  in  the 
oceanward  direction  I.  Ii  is  the  latter  zone  that  constitutes  the 
main  portion  of  the  reef,  with  its  abundant  growth  of  corals 
(Acropora,  Pocillipora,  etc. ).  It  is  this  growth  that  accounts  for 
the  origin  and  continued  development  of  the  reef  and  the  entire 
coral  atoll.    It  was  the  status  of  the  coral  settlements  in  the 


£:&) 


3  /  ^  / 

4  /  rX-*     '  Acropora-Tridacna  Reef 

5(QA    * 


Fig.  1.    Location  of  the  Acropora-Tridacna  reef  and  of  hydrobiological 
section  I-I  of  Caroline  Atoll. 

buttress  zone  that  afforded  an  indication  of  the  "health"  of  the 
reef.  Our  studies  showed  that  not  less  than  50^  of  the  surface 
area  of  the  outer  slope  of  the  Caroline  Atoll  reef  was  covered 
by  living  coral  colonies.  Assessment  on  this  basis,  using  the 
method  of  cross  sections  and  areas  (Gomez  &  Yap,  1985), 
showed  the  condition  of  the  reef  to  be  sound.  The  notorious 
"crown  of  thorns"  starfish  (Acanthaster  planet),  responsible 
for  the  devastation  of  reefs  in  other  parts  of  the  Pacific  Ocean, 
was  seen  only  once. 

The  littoral  zone  of  the  lagoon  facing  South  Island  was 
sandy.  The  sand  was  filled  with  holes  made  by  burrowing 
PolychaetaandBalanglossi.  Also  present,  sometimes  in  clusters, 
were  the  mollusks  Cerithium  columna  and  Ccrithiuni  sp.,  a  few 
Calappa  sp.  crabs,  and  gastropod  mollusksAfe/ar/iape  undulata 
and  Nerita  plicata,  the  latter  settling  by  water's  edge  on  trees 
whose  branches  dip  all  the  way  down  to  the  water. 


166 


The  northeastern  side  of  South  Island  was  washed  by 
strong  oceanic  surf  throughout  our  stay  at  the  atoll.  The 
prevailing  wind  in  this  area  is  easterly  (see  Kepler  et  <//.. 
Subchapter  1.1.  Appendix  2,  this  volume),  an  observation  that 
is  consistent  with  the  presence  on  the  eastern  side  of  South 
Island  of  extensive  coarsely  fragmented  coral  limestone  banks 
2-2.5  in  high,  attributable  to  windstorms.  These  storm  banks 
contained  large  numbers  of  fresh  bivalve  mollusk  (Asaphis  cf. 
violascens)  shells,  providing  evidence  fora  large  population  of 
these  burrowing  animals.  The  shallow  islandward  lagoon  and 
reef  flat,  with  its  extensive  sand  lenses,  is  inhabited  by  the 
aforementioned  bivalves,  large  numbers  of  gastropods  of  the 
genera  Cerithium,  Drupa,  Cyprae,  et  cetera,  as  well  as  by 
predatory  mollusks  of  the  genus  Conus,  including  unusually 
large  specimens  of  Conns  ebreus  (up  to  55  mm  long). 

The  coral  reef  on  the  western  side  of  South  Island  received 
closer  scrutiny.  The  distribution  of  organisms  over  the 
hydrobiological  section  (I-I)  is  indicated  in  Fig.  2. 

The  beach  of  the  island  showed  many  large  red  hermit  land 
crabs  Coenobitaperlata,  as  well  as  Ocypode  sp.  crabs.  Next  to 
the  beach  lay  a  zone  of  lifeless  coral  limestone  remarkable  for 
its  extreme  lack  of  living  organisms  during  the  season  of  the 
year  when  we  visited.  This  zone  became  very  narrow  to  the 
south.  The  fact  that  the  sea  had  until  recently  extended  this  far 
was  evidenced  only  by  small  numbers  of  Melarhaphe  undulata 
clinging  to  the  underside  of  sun-baked  coral  slabs.  It  appears 
that  when  the  wind  direction  changes  to  westerly,  powerful  surf 
inundates  this  area  during  high  tide.  During  our  visit,  however, 
surf  continued  to  crash  against  the  opposite  side  of  the  atoll. 
The  dry,  lifeless  zone  ended  with  a  ledge  approximately  1  m  in 
height.  The  water  reached  this  ledge  during  high  tides.  The 
dominant  fauna  consisted  of  small  hermit  crabs,  Grapsus  sp. 
crabs,  holothuria.  and  the  mollusks  Nerita  plicata  and  Thais 


armigera.  Further  seaward,  the  stones  in  the  never-drying 
pools  of  the  islandward  part  of  the  lagoon  harbored  the  following 
fauna:  Diadema  sp.  urchins;  the  mollusks  Cypraea  moneta, 
Cerithium  columna,  Cerithium  sp.,  Vasum  tuhiferum.  Conns 
ebreus,  and  Conus  sponsalis;  the  crabs  Eriphia  sp.  and  Actaea 
sp.;  three  species  of  sea  cucumbers  (Holothuroidea);  Linckia 
sp.  starfishes;  and  black  and  grey  brittle  stars  (Ophiuroidea). 
Part  of  the  coral  limestone  in  the  same  area  was  encrusted  with 
the  calcareous  algae  Porolithon  sp.  and  Lithothamnion  sp.  To 
seaward,  the  littoral  pools  became  deeperand  somewhat  larger, 
interdigitating  to  form  the  islandward  lagoon.  The  bottom  in 
this  area  consisted  of  coral  limestone  with  small  patches  of 
coral  fragments  and  sand.  The  bottom  was  strewn  with 
limestone  knolls  that  resulted  from  the  intense  buildup  of 
calcareous  algae  and  corals  of  the  genera  Porites,  Pocillopora, 
Aeropora,  and  Montipora.  These  limestone  knolls  were 
cavernous  and  often  caved  in  under  the  weight  of  an  adult 
human.  The  fissures  and  caverns  contained  numerous  small 
crabs  and  other  crustaceans,  as  well  as  sponges.  Also  prevalent 
were  algae  bushes  (Halimeda  sp.). 

The  bottom  sloped  upward  towards  the  tidal  strip,  where 
it  was  succeeded  by  a  highly  tenacious,  firmly  attached  fauna 
of  a  very  particular  kind.  Unfortunately,  because  our 
examination  was  confined  to  the  upper  portion  of  the  reef  flat, 
the  richly  populated  interior  portion  remained  unstudied.  The 
cavities  and  fissures  of  the  top  portion  of  the  reef  flat  revealed 
an  abundance  of  corals  of  the  aforementioned  genera.  Dead 
coral  colonies,  as  well  as  all  of  the  old  coral  limestone  formations, 
were  densely  encrusted  with  calcareous  algae  that  cemented 
the  reef-flat  surface  together.  There  were  many  gastropods 
(large  Turbo  argyrostomus  and  the  smaller  Drupa  ricina, 
D.  morum,  D.  grossularia,  etc. )  as  well  as  large  orange-colored 
hermit  crabs.   The  perpetually  surf-washed  tidal  areas  at  the 


Q«fe  f(3 


Corals: 

Crustaceans: 

(put) 

-  Aeropora  sp. 

& 

-  Ocypode  sp. 

<st& 

-  Pocillopora  sp. 

¥% 

-  Grapsus  sp. 

tMV\ 

-  Montipora  sp. 

** 

-  Eriphia  sp. 

C=0 

•  Porites  sp. 

$k 

-  Aklaea  sp. 

if 

-  Coenobita  periata 

Algae: 

A= 

-  Paguridae  sp. 

<***. 

-  P'rolithion  sp. 

MBSr< 

-  Lithotamnion  sp. 

Mollusks: 

0  -  Malarhaphe  undulata    y^ 

©  -  Nerita  plicata  \U/a, 

0  •  Cerithium  spp. 

ff  -  Nassa  sp. 

(2)  -  Turbo  argyrostromus 

<Q  -  Vasum  tuhiferum 

0  -  Conus  spp. 

(S  -  Cypraea  spp. 

Q  -  Thais  armisera,  and  Drupa  spp. 


Echinodermata: 
■  Heterocentrotus  sp. 


Diadema  sp. 

"7a[     -  Lichia  sp. 

<y%,    -  Ophiuroidea 
^^  -  Holothuroidea 


Fig.  2.    Distribution  of  organisms  on  the  reef  on  the  western  side  of  South  Island  of  Caroline  Atoll  (Section  I-I). 


167 


vers  edge  of  the  Hat  exhibited  magnificent  specimens  of  the  sea 
urchin  (Heterocentrotus  sp.),  with  spines  as  thick  as  cigars. 
The  limestone  caverns  sheltered  smaller  crabs  (Eriphia  sp.  and 
\i  taea  sp. ).  The  edge  of  the  reef  Hat  dropped  abruptly  some 
5-6  m,  in  places  forming  an  overhanging  ledge  that  overlooked 
the  most  abundantly  populated  and  significant  portion  of  the 
reef,  namely  the  buttress  zone  with  its  rich  variety  of  coral 
species. 

Caroline's  lagoon  enclosed  a  unique  natural  structure,  an 
unusual  Acropora-Tridacna  reef  ( Fig.  1 .  Chapter  Frontispiece). 
This  reef  extended  from  the  southernmost  islet  (Ana-Ana)  in 
the  Southern  Leeward  Islands  into  the  interior  of  a  shallow 
lagoon.  In  the  middle  of  the  lagoon,  it  divided  into  two 
branches:  a  northern  branch  that  ended  in  the  center  of  the 
lagoon,  and  an  eastern  branch  that  extended  all  the  way  to  the 
opposite  shore.  The  reef,  in  effect,  partitions  the  lagoon  into 
two  parts;  a  wide  channel  had  to  be  dug  to  permit  a  small  flat- 
bottomed  rubber  boat  to  pass.  The  width  of  the  reef  varied  from 
1 5  to  20  m,  attaining  30  m  at  its  fork.  Most  of  the  reef  surface 
stood  above  sea  level,  with  many  of  the  Tridacna  maxima  and 
corals  partially  drying  out  during  very  low  ebb  tides. 

The  distribution  of  organisms  over  a  typical  cross  section 
of  the  reef  is  shown  in  Fig.  3.  Five  distinct  zones  (two  edges, 
two  lateral  strips,  and  a  central  strip)  were  clearly  evident. 

The  edge  strips,  populated  mostly  by  fragile  colonies  of 
Acropora  secale,  A.  palmerae,  and  Acropora  sp.,  are  growth 
zones  where  vital  activity  keeps  increasing  the  reefs  width. 
The  dominant  corals  of  the  genus  Acropora  completely  cover 
the  steep  slopes  of  the  reef  as  well  as  the  neighboring  rudimentary 
reefs  that  do  not  reach  the  surface  of  the  water  in  the  lagoon. 
The  lush  coral  growth  resembles  a  huge  domed  topiary. 


The  thickness  of  the  living  coral  layer  ranges  from  20  to  70  cm. 
Parts  of  the  reef  slope  exhibited  scarps  that  probably  formed  as 
a  result  of  the  collapse  of  fragile  coral  colonies  unable  to  carry 
their  own  weight.  It  is  at  these  scarps  that  measurements  were 
made  of  the  longest  coral  branches,  some  of  which  were  found 
to  attain  a  length  of  70  cm.  The  spaces  between  the  fine  coral 
tentacles  of  the  reef  slope  were  filled  with  beaded  ( moniliform ) 
algae  (Halimeda  sp.).  Also  evident  at  the  base  of  the  reef  slope 
were  a  few,  mostly  large,  specimens  of  Tridacna  maxima. 
Beginning  at  a  depth  of  5  m  and  extending  to  the  reef  base  were 
sparse,  isolated  growths  of  fungiform  coral  ( Fungia  granulosa). 
The  colonies  of  Acropora  were  fine  and  fairly  fragile,  as  is 
typical  in  the  still-water  portions  of  many  lagoons.  It  was  risky 
to  approach  the  edge  of  the  reef,  since  the  loose  and  brittle  coral 
colonies  tended  to  crumble  underfoot. 

Beyond  the  edge  zones  (including  the  reef  slopes,  and 
extending  several  tens  of  centimeters  into  the  reef  flat)  lie 
lateral  zones  where  Tridacna  maxima  clams  are  especially 
abundant.  These  lateral  zones  have  a  width  of  3-5  m  on  either 
side  of  the  reef  (Fig.  3).  Particularly  striking  was  the  very  high 
density  of  Tridacna.  firmly  attached  to  the  reef  surface  by  the 
byssus.  which  formed  veritable  bunches  atypical  for  these 
large  mollusks  in  other  regions.  Not  uncommon  were  bunches 
of  five  or  six  clams  attached  to  one  another  by  the  byssus.  The 
average  shell  length  for  Tridacna  found  atop  the  reef  was 
12-13  cm,  with  a  maximum  length  of  1 9-20  cm  for  individual 
specimens.  No  less  striking  was  the  variety  of  coloration 
exhibited  in  their  mantles,  probably  occasioned  by  the  presence 
of  symbiotic  algae.  We  were  able  to  identify  as  many  as 
10  shades  of  blue,  green,  and  light  brown  pigmentation. 
The  average  Tridacna  population  density  in  the  lateral  zone 


^     -  coral 

(Acropora  spp.) 

|     -  mollusks 

(Tridacna  maxima) 
<X>     -  coral 

(Fungia  granulata) 


«*    -  Holothurioidea 
(Ludwigothuria  sp.) 

mm    -  algae 

(Porolithon  sp.) 

$      -  algae 

(Halimeda  sp.) 


r 


edge     i    later; 


Coral  limestone 


central 


lateral    |  edge 


ZONES 


i  ross  section  of  the  Kcropora  rrirfacna  reef  in  the  lagoon  of  Caroline  Atoll. 

168 


was  estimated  at  35  living  individuals/m2,  with  some  0.25-m2 
patches  containing  as  many  as  20  of  these  mollusks.  In  addition 
to  Tridacna  clams,  thu  lateral  strips  included  small  colonies  of 
Acropora  sp.  coral  and  some  less  abundant  lamellate  Montipora 
sp.  Also  present  were  algae  {Halimeda  sp. )  occupying  spaces 
between  Tridacna  shells  and  coral  colonies,  as  well  as  calcareous 
fouling  algae  encrusting  the  mollusk  shells  and  dead  portions 
of  coral  colonies. 

A  central  strip  7-10  m  in  width  accounts  for  most  of  the 
reef  flat.  This  site  harbored  most  of  the  dead  coral  colonies  and 
empty  Tridacna  shells,  firmly  bonded  to  the  reef  surface  by 
calcareous  fouling  algae  (Porolithon  sp.).  Nearly  809r  of  the 
surface  area  of  the  central  strip  was  covered  by  these  algae, 
which  gave  the  middle  portion  of  the  reef  added  strength.  The 
live  Tridacna  population  density  in  this  strip  was  one  order  of 
magnitude  lower  (an  average  of  4-5  individuals/m:)  than  in  the 
lateral  strips.  The  strip  also  contained  widely  scattered  colonies 
of  Acropora  sp.  and,  more  commonly .  bluish  scales  of  Montipora 
sp.  coral  colonies,  including  small  clumps  of  Halimeda  sp. 
Another  denizen  of  the  central  strip  is  the  holothurian 
Ludwigothuria  sp.  (approximately  1  specimen/nr ). 

The  central  and  lateral  strips  exhibited  a  few  small  holes 
4-8  cm  in  diameter  surrounded  by  empty  shells  of  smaller, 
thoroughly  consumed  Tridacna.  These  were  probably  the 
remains  of  meals  taken  by  predators,  namely  small  octopuses 
that  are  able  to  open  bivalve  shells  without  damaging  them. 
The  typical  division  of  the  reef  into  the  aforementioned  /ones 
is  disrupted  in  some  places.  In  these  instances,  the  central  strip 
of  the  reef  contained  a  shallow  depression  of  friable  structure 
populated  by  corals  and  Tridacna,  with  small  amounts  of 
calcareous  fouling  algae.  This  is  probably  an  intermediate 
stage  in  the  merging  of  individual  smaller  reefs  with  the  larger 
reef  traversing  the  entire  lagoon.  One  such  smaller  and  still- 
growing  reef  is  shown  on  the  left  side  of  the  reef  cross  section 
in  Fig.  3. 

It  is  interesting  to  note  that  the  Acropora-Tridacna  reef  is 
a  natural  farm  producing  large  bivalves  of  commercial  value. 
The  efficiency  of  the  "farm"  is  difficult  to  assess  without  data 
on  its  productivity.  However,  a  count  of  the  Tridacna  present 
is  possible.  According  to  the  most  conservative  estimates,  the 
surface  of  the  Acropora-  Tridacna  reef,  extending  1  km  into  the 


lagoon  of  Caroline  Atoll,  contains  approximately  300,000 
Tridacna  clams,  the  raw  weight  of  their  flesh  equaling  not  less 
than  30  tons.  It  should  be  noted  that  the  Acropora-Tridacna 
reef  actually  investigated  was  not  the  only  one  in  the  lagoon 
(Chapter  Frontispiece:  Kepler cial..  Subchapter  1.1.  this  volume. 
Figs.  47,48,57).  There  were,  in  fact,  several  such  reels,  and  if 
we  assume  that  they  are  of  similar  structure,  the  above  figures 
can  be  multiplied  by  an  appropriate  factor  to  show  the  actual 
reserves  of  valuable  food  protein  available  in  Caroline"s 
waters. 

The  unusually  high  density  of  living  Tridacna  in  Caroline's 
lagoon  was  especially  striking,  exceeding  any  previously  known 
populations  of  both  Tridacna  maxima  and  T  crocea  (usually 
more  abundant  in  other  parts  of  the  World  Ocean).  For 
example,  the  Palau  Islands  (western  Pacific)  were  reported  to 
have  just  six  T.  maxima  and  153  T.  crocea  within  an  area  of 
1 . 1 00  m-  ( Hardy  &  Hardy,  1 969),  whereas  the  same  area  on  the 
Acropora-Tridacna  reel  in  Caroline  Atoll  lagoon  contained 
16,500  T.  maxima.  Richards  (  1 985 )  found  that  T.  maxima  in  the 
Tuamotus  numbered  6-20/nr  at  Takapoto  Atoll,  and  up  to 
60/rrr  at  Reao  Atoll.  Although  these  are  the  highest  densities 
previously  reported,  they  do  not  equal  the  numbers  found  in  the 
densest  patches  on  Caroline. 

The  very  considerable  effect  of  such  an  enormous  mass  of 
large  mollusks  on  the  entire  atoll  is  also  noteworthy.  This  is 
because  in  symbiosis  with  zooxanthellae.  which  are  the  principal 
food  of  the  Tridacna  clam,  the  latter  experience  intensive 
growth  and  in  turn  enrich  their  habitat  with  proteins  (Ricard& 
Salvat.  1977).  Dataconcerning  the  natural  Acropora-Tridacna 
reef  could  be  put  to  use  in  creating  artificial  reefs  in  other  parts 
of  the  ocean  to  achieve  considerably  enhanced  productivity. 

The  sound  condition  of  the  coral  reef  around  Caroline 
Atoll,  as  well  as  the  presence  in  its  lagoon  of  a  uniquely 
interesting  natural  feature  in  the  formof  the  Acropora-Tridacna 
reef,  may  be  deemed  sufficient  grounds  for  organizing  a  marine 
reserve  in  the  area. 

The  authors  are  grateful  to  US  colleagues  Kay  and  Cameron 
Kepler  and  D.  Smith,  participants  in  the  47th  voyage  of  the  research 
vessel  Akademik  Korolev,  lor  their  active  assistance  in  field  work  on 
Caroline  Atoll.  They  also  wish  to  thank  Yu.N.Latypovforidentifying 
the  corals. 


169 


Chapter  1  References 


Admiralty  Chart,  No.  979.  (1965).    Central  Pacific  Ocean: 

Islands  between    160°  East  and  150°   West  Longitude 

J.  D.  Potter.  London. 
Amerson,  A.  B„  Jr.  &  Shelton.  P.  S.  ( 1 976).  The  natural  history 

of  Johnston  Atoll,  central  Pacific  Ocean.   Atoll  Res.  Bull. 

192,  1-479. 
Arundel.  J.  T.  ( 1 890).  The  Phoenix  Group  and  other  islands  of 

the  Pacific.  New  Zealand  Herald,  Auckland.  July  5  and  12, 

1890. 
Ashmole,  N.  P.  ( 1 963 ).  The  fairy  tern  Gygis  alba  on  Ascension 

Island.  Ibis  103b.  365-378. 
Ashmole,  N.  P.  ( 1968).   Breeding  and  molt  in  the  white  tern 

(Gygis  alba)  on  Christmas  Island,  Pacific  Ocean.    Condor 

70.  35-55. 
Bavliss-Smith.T.  P.  (1973).  Ecosystem  and  Economic  System 

of Ontong  Java  Atoll,  Solomon  Islands.  Cambridge  University 

Ph.  D.  Thesis. 
Bennett.  F.  D.  ( 1 840).  Narrative  of  a  whaling  voyage  round  the 

globe  from  the  year  1833-36,  Vol.  I.  BibliothecaAustraliana 

46,  1-402. 
Bogert,  C.  ( 1937).  Birds  collected  during  the  Whitney  South 

Sea  Expedition.  XXXIV.  The  distribution  and  the  migration 

of  the  long-tailed  cuckoo  (Urodynamis  taitensis  Sparrman). 

Am.  Mus.  Novit.  933,  1-12. 
Braley.  R.  D.  (1987).     Spatial  distribution  and  population 

parameters  of  Tridacna  gigas  and  T.  derasa.  Micronesica 

20,  225-246. 
Broughton.  W.  R.  (1804).  A  Voyage  of  Discovery  to  the  North 

Pacific  Ocean.   .   .   Performed  in  His  Majesty's  Sloop 

Providence.  .  .  in  1795,  1796.  1797,  1798.    T.  Cadell  and 

W.  Davies.  Rep..  London. 
Brown.  W.  C.  ( 1956).  The  distribution  of  terrestrial  reptiles  in 

the  islands  of  the  Pacific  Basin.  Proc.  5th  Pac.  Sci.  Conf.  3A. 
1479-1491. 
Bryan,  E.  H.  ( 1942).  American  Polynesia  and  the  Hawaiian 

Chain.  Tongg  Publ.  Co..  Honolulu.  253  pp. 
Butler.  A.  G.  &  Strecker.  H.  (1884).    Memorandum  of  the 

butterflies,  etc.  of  Caroline  Island.  In  Report  of  the  Eclipse 

Expedition  to  Caroline  Island  May  1883.   Natl.  Acad.  Sci. 

Mem.  2,  92-96. 
Catala,  R.  L.  A.  ( 1957).  Report  on  the  Gilbert  Islands:  Some 

aspects  of  human  ecology.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  59,  Oct.  3 1 . 
Christopherson,  E.  ( 1927).    Vegetation  of  Pacific  equatorial 

islands.  B.  P.  Bishop  Mus.  Bull.  44.  79  pp. 
Clapp,  R.B.  (1967).  Line  Islands.  Unpublished  report.  32  pp. 
Clapp.  R.  B.  &  Sibley.  F.  C.  ( 1967 ).  New  records  of  birds  from 

the  Phoenix  and  Line  Islands.  Ibis  109.  122-125. 
Clapp.  R.  B.  &  Sibley,  F.  C.  ( 1968).  Additional  new  records 

of  birds  from  the  Phoenix  and  Line  Islands.  Ibis  110, 
573-575. 
Clapp.  R.  B.  &  Sibley.  F.  C.  ( 1971a).  Notes  on  the  vascular 
flora  and  terrestrial  vertebrates  of  Caroline  Atoll,  Southern 
Line  Islands.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  145.  Washington,  D.C.. 
Smithsonian  Institution.  20  pp. 


Clapp,  R.  B.  &  Sibley.  F.C.  (1971b).  The  vascular  flora  and 
terrestrial  vertebrates  of  Vostock  Island,  south-central 

Pacific.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  144.  1-10. 
Clark.  L.,  Ricklefs,  R.  E.  &  Schreiber,  R.  W.  ( 1983).  Nest-site 

selection  by  the  red-tailed  tropicbird.  Auk  100,  953-959. 
Clay,  H.  (1961).    Narrative  report  of  botanical  fieldwork  on 

Kure  Island.  3  October  1959  to  9  October  1959.  Atoll  Res. 

Bull.  78.  1-4. 
Commercial  Advertiser,  The.  ( 1873).   From  Caroline  Island. 

Honolulu.  Two-line  note  in  newspaper,  March  5,  1873. 
Crombie.R.  I.  (in  prep. ).  Herpetofauna  of  Oceania:  Island  lists 

and  species  distributions. 
Danielsson.  B.  ( 1954).  Native  topographical  terms  in  Raroia, 

Tuamotus.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  32,  92-96. 
Darwin.  C.  R.  ( 1 842 ).  The  Structure  and  Distribution  of  Coral 

Reefs.  Smith.  Elder  &  Co..  London,  xii  +  214  pp. 
Degener,  O.  &  Gillaspy.  E.  (1955).    Canton  Island.  South 

Pacific.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  41.  Aug.  15. 
Diamond.  A.  W.  (1971).    The  ecology  of  the  sea  birds  of 

Aldabra.  Philos.  Trans.  R.  Soc.  hand.  B260.  561-571. 
Diamond.  A.  W.  ( 1973).   Notes  on  the  breeding  biology  and 

behavior  of  the  magnificent  frigatebird.     Condor  75. 

200-209. 
Diamond,  A.  W.  (1975a).     The  biology  of  tropicbirds  at 

Aldabra  Atoll.  Indian  Ocean.  Auk  92,  16-39. 
Diamond.  A.  W.(  1975b).  Biology  and  behavior  of  frigatebirds 

Fregata  spp.  on  Aldabra  Atoll.  Ibis  117,  302-323. 
Dinsmore,  J.  J.  ( 1972).  Sooty  tern  behavior.  Bull.  Fla.  State 

Mus.  Biol.  Sci.  16(3).  129-179. 
Dixon.  W.  S.  ( 1884).  Notes  on  the  zoology  of  Caroline  Island. 

In  Report  of  the  Operations  of  the  American  Expedition 

to.  .  .  Caroline  Island  May  1883.  Natl.  Acad.  Sci.  Mem.  2, 

90-92. 
Dorward,  D.  F.  &  Ashmole.  N.  P.  ( 1963).  Notes  on  the  biology 

of  the  brown  noddy  (Anous  stolidits)  on  Ascension  Island. 

Ibis  103b.  447-457. 
Doty.  M.  S.  &  Morrison.  J.  P.  E.  ( 1954).  Interrelationships  of 

the  organisms  on  Raroia  aside  from  man.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  35. 

Nov.  30. 
Ellis,  D.  H.,  Kepler.  C.  B.,  Kepler.  A.  K.  &  Teeb'aki,  K.  (1990). 

Occurrence  of  the  long-tailed  cuckoo  {Eudynamis  taitensis) 

on  Caroline  Atoll.  Kiribati.  Emu  90.  202. 
Ellsworth.  S.  G.  (ed.  )  ( 1990).  The  Journals  of  Addison  Pratt: 

Being  a  Narrative  of  Yankee  Whaling  in  the  Eighteen 

Twenties,  A  Mormon  Mission  to  the  Society  Islands.  .  ..  in 

the  Eighteen  Forties  and  Fifties.  University  of  Utah  Press, 

Salt  Lake  City,  Utah.  606  pp. 
Ely.C.  A.  &  Clapp.  R.  B.  ( 1 973 ).  The  natural  history  of  Laysan 

Island,  northwestern  Hawaiian  Islands.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  171. 

xi  +  361. 
Emory,  K.  P.  (1947).    Tuamotuan  religious  structures  and 

ceremonies.  B.  P.  Bishop  Mus.  Bull.  191,  102  pp. 
Findlay,  A.  G.  (1884).    Directory  for  the  Navigation  of  the 

South  Pacific  Ocean.  5th  Edition.  London. 


171 


Fleet,  R.  R.(  1972).  Nesting  success  of  the  red-tailed  tropicbird 

on  Kure  Atoll.  Auk  89.  651-659. 
Fleet.  R.  R.  ( 1974).  The  red-tailed  tropicbird  on  Kure  Atoll. 

A.  O.  U.  Monogr.  16,  1-64. 
losberg,  F.  R.  ( 1936).   Vegetation  of  Vostok  Island,  Central 

Pacific.  B.  P.  Bishop  Mas.  Spec.  Publ.  30,  19. 
Fosberg.  F.  R.  ( 1949).  Atoll  vegetation  and  salinity.  Pac.  Sci. 

3.  89-92. 
Fosberg.  F.  R.  (1953).   Vegetation  of  Central  Pacific  atolls. 

Atoll  Res.  Bull.  23.  1-26. 
Fosberg,  F.  R.  ( 1955).  Northern  Marshalls  Expedition.  1951- 

1952.  Land  biota:  Vascular  plants.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  39, 1-22. 
Fosberg,  F.  R.  (1956).    Military  Geography  of  the  Northern 

Marshalls,  prepared  under  the  direction  of  the  Chief 

of  Engineers.  US  Army,  and  the  US  Geological  Survey. 

320  pp. 
Fosberg,  F.  R.  ( 1959).   Vegetation  and  flora  of  Wake  Island. 

Atoll  Res.  Bull.  67,  1-20. 
Fosberg,  F.  R.  (ed.   )  (1965).     Man's  Place  in  the  Island 

Ecosystem:  A  Symposium.    10th  Pacific  Science  Congress, 

Honolulu,  Hawaii,  1961.  Bishop  Museum  Press.  264  pp. 
Fosberg,  F.  R.  (1968).  Critical  notes  on  Pacific  island  plants  2. 

Micronesica  4(2),  255-259. 
Fosberg,  F.  R.  ( 1977a).   Coral  island  vegetation.   In  Biology 

ami  Geology  of  Coral  Reefs,  Vol.  III.  (O.  A.  Jones  & 

R.  Endean,  eds.),  pp.  256-277.  Academic  Press. 
Fosberg,  F.  R.  ( 1977b).  An  irresponsible  scientific  expedition. 

Atoll  Res.  Bull.  219,  4-5. 
Fosberg.  F.  R.  ( 1983).  The  human  factor  in  the  biogeography 

of  oceanic  islands.  C.  R.  Soc.  Biogeogr.  59(2),  147-190. 
Fosberg,  F.  R.  ( 1985).  Present  state  of  knowledge  of  the  floras 

and  vegetation  of  emergent  reef  surfaces.  Vol.  5.  Proc.  5th 

Int.  Coral  ReefCongr.,  Tahiti.  1985. 
Fosberg.  F.R.&  Sachet,  M.-H.l  1969).  Wake  Island  vegetation 

and  flora.  1961-1963.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  123,  1-15. 
Fosberg,  F.  R.  &  Sachet,  M.  -H.  ( 1987).  Flora  of  the  Gilbert 

Islands,  Kiribati,  checklist.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  295,  1-33. 
Fosberg.  F.  R.  &  Sachet,  M.  -H.  (MS).   Flora  of  the  Phoenix 

Islands.  Unpublished  manuscripts.  Pt.  1, 85  pp. ;  Pt.  II.  52  pp. 
Fowler,  H.  W.  (1901).    Fishes  from  Caroline  Island.    Proc. 

Acad  Nat.  Sci.  Phila.  53,  324-326. 
Frisbie,  R.  D.  (1944).  The  Island  of  Desire.  Garden  City.  New 

York.  234  pp. 
Garnett,   M.  C.   (1983).     A   Management  Plan  for  Nature 

Conservation  in  the  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands.     Pt.   I: 

Description,    318    pp.:    Pts.    II,    III:       Policy    and 

Recommendations,  131  pp.   Unpublished  reports. 
Garnett,  M.  C.  ( 1984).  Conservation  of  seabirds  in  the  South 

Pacific  region:   A  review.   ICBP  Tech.  Pub.  2.  547-557. 
Gibson   Hill.  C.  A.  ( 1950).   Notes  on  the  birds  of  the  Cocos- 

Keeling  Islands.  Bull.  Raffles  Mus.  22.  212-270. 
Gill,  R.  F.  (1990).    Ecology  of  curlews  in  French  Polynesia 

during  spring.    In  Summary  of  the  Proceedings  from  the 

Workshop  on  Bristle  thighed  Curlews.  Anchorage,  Alaska 

(R.  F.  Gill  &  C.  M.  Handel,  eds).  22  pp. 
Gill.R.  E&  Redmond, R.  L.  ( in  prep.).  Distribution  and  habitat 

associations  of  bristle  thighed  curlews  on  Rangiroa  Atoll. 

15  pp. 


Gomez,  E.  D.  &  Yap.  H.  T.  ( 1 985 ).  Setting  up  an  international 

coral  reef  monitoring  system.    In  Comprehensive  Global 

Monitoring   of  the    World   Ocean   (A.    V.   Tsyban   & 

A.  S.  Sarkisyan,  eds.).  pp.  16-31.   Proceedings  of  the  First 

International   Symposium.   Vol.   2.     Gidrometeoizdat 

Publishers.  Leningrad,  (in  Russian) 
Guppy.  H.  B.  (1906).    Observations  of  a  Naturalist  in  the 

Pacific  Between  1896  and  1899.   Vol.  II.  Plant-Dispersal. 

Macmillan  &  Co.,  New  York.  627  pp. 
Hardy.  J.  T.  &  Hardy,  S.  A.  ( 1969).  Ecology  of  Tridacna  m 

Palau.  Pac.  Sci.  23,  467-472. 
Hatheway,  W.  H.  (1953).  The  land  vegetation  of  Arno  Atoll, 

Marshall  Islands.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  16.  April  30. 
Helfman.  G.  S.  (No  date).   Ecological  considerations  for  the 

management  of  the  coconut  crab.  Birgus  latro  (L). 

Unpublished  manuscript.  8  pp. 
Helfman.  G.  S.  ( 1977a).  Ecology  and  Behavior  of  the  Coconut 

Crab,  Birgus  latro  (L.  >.  M.  S.  Thesis.  University  of  Hawaii, 

Parti.    109  pp. 
Helfman,  G.  S.  (1977b).    Temporal  Distribution  of  Crabs. 

M.  S.  Thesis,  University  of  Hawaii.  Part  II.    158  pp. 
Helfman.  G.  S.  (1979).  Coconut  crabs  and  cannibalism.  Nat. 

Hist.  88(9),  76-83. 
Holden,  E.  S.  (1884).     History,  in  Report  of  the  Eclipse 

Expedition  to  Caroline  Island  May  1883.   Natl.  Acad.  Sci. 

Mem.  2,  20-22. 
Holden,  E.  S.  &  Qualtrough,  E.  F.  ( 1 884).  Description  of  the 

island.     In  Report  of  the  Eclipse  Expedition  to  Caroline 

Island  Max  1883.  Natl.  Acad.  Sci.  Mem.  2.  22-26. 
Hydrographer  of  the  Navy.  (1931.  1982).     Pacific  Islands 

Pilot.  Vol.  III.    Ministry  of  Defense.  Taunton.  Somerset, 

England. 
Johnsgard.  P.  A.  ( 1981 ).  The  Plovers.  Sandpipers,  and  Snipes 

of  the  World.     University  of  Nebraska  Press.  Lincoln. 

Nebraska. 
Kepler.  A.  K.  ( 1990a).  Caroline  Atoll:   Fact  sheet,  including 

conservation  attributes  and  recommendations.  Unpublished 

manuscript.    12  pp. 
Kepler,  A.  K.(  1990b).  Flint  Island:  Fact  sheet.  Unpublished 

manuscript.  6  pp. 
Kepler,  A.  K.(  1990c).  Vostok  Island:  Fact  sheet.  Unpublished 

manuscript.  6  pp. 
Kepler.  A.  K.  (1990d).  Report:  ICBP  1990  Line  and  Phoenix 

Islands  Expedition,  Februarj  20-May31, 1990.  Unpublished 

manuscript.    14  pp. 
Kepler,  A.  K.  (in  prep.  ).  Ecological  studies  of  Vostok  Island. 

Republic  of  Kiribati. 
Kepler.  A.  K..  Kepler.  C.  B.  &  Ellis.  D.  II.  (1991).  Ecological 

studies  of  Caroline  Atoll.  Southern  Line  Islands.  Republic  ol 

Kiribati.  Part  I.    History,  physiography,  botany,  and  islet 

descriptions  (Subchapter  I.  I ,  this  volume). 
Kepler.  C.  B.  (1967).    Polynesian  rat  predation  on  Laysan 

albatrosses  and  other  Pacific  seabirds.  Auk  84.  426-429. 
Kepler.  C.  B.  (1969).    Breeding  biology  of  the  blue-faced 

booby  on  Green  Island.  Kure  Atoll.  Publ.  Nuttall  Ornithol. 

ClubS,  1-97. 
Kepler.  C.  B.  (1978).    Ihc  breeding  ecology  of  sea  birds  on 

Monito  Island.  Puerto  Rico.  Condor80,  72-87. 


172 


Kepler,  C.  B.  &  Kepler,  A.  K.  (1978).  The  sea  birds  of  Culebra 

and  its  adjacent  islands,  Puerto  Rico.   The  Living  Bird  16, 

21-50. 
Kepler.  C.  B.  &  Kepler,  A.  K.  (1989).    Trip  report,  Soviet- 
American  oceanographic  expedition  to  the  central  Pacific: 

Hilo.  Hawaii  to  Singapore,  9  Sept.-31  Oct.  1988.  Unpublished 

manuscript.  9  pp. 
King.  W.  B.  ( 1973).    Conservation  status  of  birds  of  central 

Pacific  islands.   Wilson  Bull.  85.  89-103. 
Lack,  D.  (1959).  Migration  across  the  sea.  Ibis  101,  374-399. 
Lamberson,  J.  O.  ( 1 987).  Natural  history  of  terrestrial  vascular 

plants  of  Enewetak  Atoll.   In  Vol.  II.  The  Natural  History 

ofEnewetak  Atoll.  Chapter  3,  pp.  17-35.    US  Department 

of  Energy.  348  pp. 
Lamoureaux,  C.  ( 1961 ).    Botanical  observations  on  leeward 

Hawaiian  atolls.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  79.  1-10. 
Lucett.  E.  ( 185 1 ).  Rovings  in  the  Pacific  from  1837  to  1849. 

with  a  Glance  at  California,  Vol.  II.    By  a  merchant  long 

resident  at  Tahiti.    2  Vols.,  Longman.  Brown  and  Green. 

London,  xi  +  371  pp. 
Mac  Arthur,  R.  H.  &  Wilson,  E.  O.  ( 1967).  The  Theory  of  Island 

Biogeography.  Princeton  University  Press.  Princeton.  New 

Jersey.  203  pp. 
Markham.  Sir  Clements.  (1904).     The  Voyages  of  Pedro 

Fernandez  de  Quiros.    1595-1606,  2  Vols..   Hakluyt 

Society.  Series  II,  Nos.    14-15.     The  Hakluyt  Society. 

London. 
Marks,  J.  S..  Redmond,  R.  L.,  Hendricks,  P.,  Clapp,  R.  B.  & 

Gill.  R.  E.  ( 1990).  Notes  on  longevity  and  flightlessness  in 

bristle-thighed  curlews.  Auk  107(4),  779-781. 
Maude,  H.  E.  (ca.   1938).     Caroline  Island.     Unpublished 

manuscript.  8  pp. 
Maude,  H.  E.  (ca.  1942a).  Caroline  Island:  Part  L.  Ms.  from 

author,  of  unknown  origin.  6  pp.  (printed  but  not  published). 
Maude,  H.  E.  (ca.  1942b).    Flint  Island:    Part  N.    Author's 

manuscript.,  of  unknown  origin.    4  pp.  (printed  but  not 

published). 
Maude,  H.  E.  (1953).  The  British  Central  Pacific  Islands:  A 

report  on  land  classification  and  utilization,  Proc.  7th  Pac. 

Sci.  Congr.  60,  89-97. 
Maude,  H.  E.  (1968).  Of  Islands  and  Men.  Oxford  University 

Press,  London  and  New  York.  397  pp. 
Maude,  H.  E.  (No  date).   Bibliography  of  Books.  Pamphlets. 

and  Articles  on  the  Phoenix  and  Line  Islands.  Ms.,  printed 

but  not  published,  in  author's  possession.  4  pp. 
McKeown.  S.  (1978).    Hawaiian  Reptiles  and  Amphibians. 

The  Oriental  Publishing  Company,  Honolulu,  Hawaii. 

80  pp. 
Moul,  E.  T.  (1957).  Preliminary  report  on  the  flora  of  Onotoa 

Atoll.  Gilbert  Islands.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  57.  1-48. 
Mueller-Dombois,  D..  Bridges,  K.  W.  &  Carson.  H.  L.  ( 198 1 ). 

Island  Ecosystems:    Biological  Organization  in  Selected 

Hawaiian  Communities.     Hutchinson  Ross  Publishing 

Company,  Stroudsburg.  Pennsylvania.  583  pp. 
Nelson,  J.  B.  ( 1969).  The  breeding  ecology  of  the  red-footed 

booby  in  the  Galapagos.  J.  Anim.  Ecol.  38,  181-198. 
Nelson,  J.  B.  (1976).  The  breeding  biology  of  frigatebirds — a 

comparative  review.  The  Living  Bird  14,  1 13-155. 


Nelson,  J.  B.  (1978).    The  Sulidae:    Gannets  and  Boobies. 

Oxford  University  Press.  Oxford,  England.    1,012  pp. 
Newell,  N.  D.  (1956).   Geological  reconnaissance  of  Raroia 

( Kon Tiki )  Atoll, Tuamotu  Archipelago.  Bull.  Am.  Mus.  Nat. 

Hist.  109.311-372. 
Nicholson,  E.  M.  &  Douglas,  G.  (1969).  Draft  Check  List  of 

Pacific  Oceanic  Islands.  Micronesica  5(2),  327^63. 
N.  I.  D.  (Great  Britain  Naval  Intelligence  Division).  (1943). 

Pacific  Islands,  Vol.  II,  Eastern  Pacific.   H.  M.  Stationery 

Office.  London,  xvi  +  739  pp. 
Niering.  W.  A.  (1956).  Bioecology  of  Kapingamarangi  Atoll, 

Caroline  Islands:    Terrestrial  aspects.   Atoll  Res.  Bull.  49. 

1-32. 
Niering,  W.  A.  ( 1 963).  Terrestrial  ecology  of  Kapingamarangi 

Atoll,  Caroline  Islands.  Ecol.  Monogr.  33,  131-160. 
Norman,  F.  I.  (1975).    The  Murine  rodents  Rattits  rattus, 

exulans,  and  non'egicus  as  avian  predators.  Atoll  Res.  Bull. 

182,  1-13. 
Parham,  B.  E.  V.  ( 197 1 ).  The  vegetation  of  the  Tokelau  Islands 

with  special  reference  to  the  plants  of  Nukunono  Atoll.  N.  Z. 

J.  Bot.  9.  576-609. 
Paulding,  H.  ( 1 83 1 ).  Journal  of  a  Cruise  of  the  United  States 

Schooner  Dolphin.  ...   G.  &  C.  &  H.  Carvill,  New  York. 

iv  +  258  pp. 
Perry,  R.  (1980).    Wildlife  conservation  in  the  Line  Islands, 

Republic  of  Kiribati  (formerly  Gilbert  Islands).    Environ. 

Consen:  7,311-318. 
Perry,  R.  &  Garnett,  M.  (No  date).   The  Natural  History  and 

Birdlife  of  Christmas  Island.   ICBP,  Cambridge,  England. 

36  pp. 
Phillips,  N.J.  ( 1984).  Spatial  relationships  of  Pisonia  grandis 

and  Cocos  nucifera.  Cousin  Island  Research  Station  (ICBP. 

Seychelles  Islands.  Indian  Ocean)  Technical  Report.  9  pp. 
Phillips,  N.  J.  &  Phillips,  V.  E.  (1990).  Monitoring  vegetation 

changes  on  Cousin — A  comparative  summary  of  changes 

since  1976.  Cousin  Island  Research  Station  (ICBP.  Seychelles 

Islands,  Indian  Ocean)  Technical  Report.  43  pp. 
Pilsbry,  H.  A.  &  Vanatta,  E.  G.  (1905a).  Mollusca  of  Flint  and 

Caroline  Islands,  in  the  central  Pacific.  Proc.  Acad.  Nat.  Sci. 

Phi  la..  57,291-293. 
Pilsbry,  H.  A.  &  Vanatta,  E.  G.  (1905b).    On  some  Pacific 

Cerithiidae.  Proc.  Acad.  Nat.  Sci..  Phila.,  57.  787-789. 
Pratt,  H.  D.,  Bruner,  P.  L.  &  Berrett,  D.  G.  (1987).   A  Field 

Guide  to  the  Birds  of  Hawaii  and  the  Tropical  Pacific. 

Princeton  University  Press,  Princeton,  New  Jersey. 
Preobrazhenskiy.  B.  V.  (1986).  Modern  Reefs.  Nauka  Press, 

243  pp.  (in  Russian) 
Rauzon,  M.  J.,  Harrison,  C.  S.  &  Clapp,  R.  B.  (1984).  Breeding 

biology  of  the  blue-gray  noddy.    J.  Field  Ornithol.  55. 

309-321. 
Reese,  E.  S.  ( 1965).  The  ecology  of  the  coconut  crab.  Birgus 

latro(L. ).  Bull.  Ecol.  Soc.America46(4).  191-192.  Abstract. 
Reese,  E.  S.  ( 1987).  Terrestrial  environments  and  ecology  of 

Enewetak  Atoll.  In  The  Natural  Histoiy  of  Enewetak  Atoll, 

Vol.1.,  pp.  187-202. 
Reyne.  A.  ( 1939).    On  the  food  habits  of  the  coconut  crab 

(Birgus  latro  L.  ),  with  notes  on  its  distribution.  Arch.  Neer. 

I.  Zool.  3.  283-320.  (in  French) 


173 


Ricard,  M.  &  Salvat,  B.  (1977).  Faeces  of  Tridacna  maxima 

( Mollusca-Bi  val  via),  composition  and  coral  reef  importance. 

In  Proceedings:  Third  International  Coral  Reef  Symposium, 

Rosenstiel  School  of  Marine  and  Atmospheric  Science. 

University  of  Miami.  Florida. 
Richard.  G.  (1985).  Richness  of  the  Great  Sessile  Bivalves  in 

Takapoto  Lagoon.    5th  Int.  Coral  Reef  Congress,  French 

Polynesia,  pp.  368-37 1 . 
Ridley.  H.  N.  ( 19301.  The  Dispersal  of  Plants  Throughout  the 

World.    L.  Reeve  &  Co..  Ltd..  Ashford,  United  Kingdom. 

744  pp. 
RNZAF.     (1986).     Aerial  photographs  of  Caroline  Island 

(Gilberts),  No.  6569.  taken  by  the  Royal  New  Zealand  Air 

Force  Plan  No.  1036  9d-h,  Department  of  Survey  and  Land 

Information,  Wellington,  New  Zealand. 
Sachet,  M.  -H.  ( 1 967 ).  Coral  Islands  as  ecological  laboratories. 

Micronesica  3.  45—49. 
Sachet,  M.  -H.  ( 1983 ).  Takapoto  Atoll.  Tuamotu  Archipelago: 

Terrestrial  vegetation  and  flora.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  277,  1^46. 
Sachet.  M.  -H.  &  Fosberg.  F.  R.  (1983).     An  ecological 

reconnaissance  of  Tetiaroa  Atoll,  Society  Islands.  Atoll  Res. 

Bull.  275.  1-28. 
St.  John,  H.  ( 1973).  List  and  summary  of  the  flowering  plants 

in  the  Hawaiian  islands.    Pac.  Trap.  Bot.  Garden  Mem.  1 
519  pp. 
St.  John,  H.  &  Fosberg,  F.  R.  ( 1 937 ).  Vegetation  of  Flint  Island, 

Central  Pacific.   Bernice  P.  Bishop  Museum,  Occas.  Pap.. 

Honolulu.  Hawaii.   12(24).  3—1. 
St.  John.  H.&Philipson,W.R.(  I960).  List  of  the  flora  of  Oeno 

Atoll.  Tuamotu  Archipelago,  south-central  Pacific  Ocean. 

Trans.  R.  Soc.  N.Z.  88(3).  401-403. 
Schreiber,  R.  W.  &  Ashmole.  N.  P.  ( 1970).  Seabird  breeding 

seasons  on  Christmas  Island.  Pacific  Ocean.     Ibis  112. 

363-344. 
Seelye.  C.  J.  ( 1950).  Rainfall  and  its  variability  over  the  central 

and  south-western  Pacific.    N.Z.  J.  Sci.  Tech.  [B]  32(2). 
11-24. 
Shaw.  H.  K.A.(  1952).  On  the  distribution  of  Pisonia  grandis 

R.  Br.  (Nyctaginaceae),  with  special  reference  to  Malaysia. 

Ken  Bull.,  pp.  87-97. 
Sibley.  F.  C.  &  Clapp.  R.  B.  (1967).  Distribution  and  dispersal 

of  central  Pacific  lesser  frigatebirds,  Fregataariel.  Ibis  109. 
528-337. 
Smith.  G.  J.  &  Volodkovich.  V.  1..  (  1988).  Preliminary  report 

on  marine  plastics:  Methods  of  collection  and  quantification. 
Unpublished  manuscript.  31    October    19SS.   in  Soviet- 


American  Joint  Expedition  III  {1988),  Appendix 


pp. 


Smithe.  F.  B.  (1975).  Naturalist's  Color  Guide.  American 
Museum  of  Natural  History.  New  York.  New  York. 

Spicer,  R.  A.  &  Newbery.  D.  McC.  (1979).  The  terrestrial 
vegetation  of  an  Indian  Ocean  coral  island:  Wilingili,  Addu 
Atoll,  Maldive  Islands.  [.Transect  Analysis  of  the  Vegetation. 
Atoll  Res.  Bull.  231.  1-21. 

Stevens,  H.  N.  &  Barwick,  (i.  F.  I  1930).  New  light  on  the 
discover)  of  Australia  as  revealed  In  the  journal  of  captain 
Don  Diego  de  Prado  y  Tovai.  Hakluyt  Society.  Series  II. 
No.  64.  The  Hakluyt  Society,  London. 


Stoddart.D.  R.  ( 1976).  Scientific  Importance  andConservation 

of  Central  Pacific  Islands.  Unpublished  manuscript.  28  pp. 
Stoddart.  D.  R.  &  Fosberg.  F.  R.  (1972).    Reef  islands  of 

Rarotonga  with  list  of  vascular  plants.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  160. 

1-22. 
Stoddart.  D.  R.  &  Gibbs.  P.  E.  (1975).     Almost-atoll  of 

Aitutaki:  Reef  studies  in  the  Cook  Islands,  South  Pacific. 

Atoll  Res.  Bull.  190,  1-158. 
Stoddart.  D.  R.  &  Sachet.  M.  -H.  (1969).    Reconnaissance 

geomorphology  of  Rangiroa  Atoll.  Tuamotu  Archipelago. 

with  list  of  vascular  flora  of  Rangiroa.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  125. 

1-44. 
Stone,  B.  C.  ( 1968).   Notes  on  Pandanus  in  the  Line  Islands. 

Micronesica  4(  1 ).  85-93. 
Stone,  E.  L.  ( 1953).   Summary  of  information  on  atoll  soils. 

Atoll  Res.  Bull.  23.  1-6. 
Stonehouse.  B.  ( 1962).  The  tropic  birds  (genus  Phaethori)  of 

Ascension  Island.  Ibis  103b.  124-161. 
Taylor.  R.  C.  (1973).    An  atlas  of  Pacific  Islands  rainfall. 

Hawaii  Inst.  Geophys.,  Data  Report  25. 
Teeb'  aki.  K.  ( 1 988 ).  Report  of  visit  to  Caroline  Atoll.  Southern 

Line  Islands.  Wildlife  Conservation  Unit,  Christmas  Island. 

Republic  of  Kiribati.  Unpublished  manuscript.    12  pp. 
Thaman,R.R.(1987).  Plantsof  Kiribati:  A  listing  and  analysis 

of  vernacular  names.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  296.  42  pp. 
Thomas,  W.  L.  (1961 ).  The  variety  of  physical  environments 

among  Pacific  Islands.     In  Man's  Place  in  the  Island 

Ecosystem  (F.  R.  Fosberg.  ed.),  3rd  Edition,  1970.  264  pp. 

Bishop  Museum  Press,  1965. 
Tracey,  J.  I..  Jr..  Cloud.  P.  E.  &  Emery.  K.  O.  (1955). 

Conspicuous  features  of  organic  reefs.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  46. 

National  Research  Council.  Washington.  D.C. 
Trelease.  W.  (1884).  Botany  of  Caroline  Island.  In  Report  of 

the  Eclipse  Expedition  to  Caroline  Island  May  ISS3.  Natl. 

Acad.  Sci.  Mem.  2.  87-90. 
Tsyban.  A.  V.  &  Smith.  G.  J.  (1988).    Protocol  of  the  Third 

Soviet-American  Joint  Expedition.     Pan  II.  The  Central 

Pacific  Ocean  and  South  China  Sea.  aboard  the  R/V  Akademik 

Korolev,  9  September  -  31  October.  1988.    Unpublished 

report.  6  pp. 
Upton.  W.  ( 1 884).  Meteorology  of  Caroline  Island.  In  Report 

of  the  Eclipse  Expedition  to  Caroline  Island  May  1883, 

pp.  41-86. 
US  Dept.  of  Energy.  (1987).  The  Natural  History  ofEnewetak 

Atoll.  Vols.  I  and  II.  228  and  348  pp..  respectively.  Office  of 

Scientific  and  Technical   Information.  US  Deartment  of 

Energy. 
Wagner.  W.  L.  Herbst.  D.  R.  &  Sohmer.  S.  H.  ( 1990).  Manual 

of  the  Flowering  Plants  qfHawai  'i.  Vols.  I  and  II.  University 

of  Hawaii  Press  and  Bishop  Museum  Press.    1.  853  pp. 
Wester.  L.  (1985).    Checklist  of  the  vascular  plants  of  the 

northern  Line  Islands.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  287.  38  pp. 
Whitehead.  I).  R.  &  Jones.  C.  E.  (1969).  Small  islands  and  the 

equilibrium  theory  of  insular  biogeographv.   Evolution  23. 
1  7  1  -  1  79.   Lancaster.  Pennsylvania. 
Wiens.  H.J.  (1956).  The  Geography  of  Kapingamarangi  Atoll 
in  the  Eastern  Carolines.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  48. 


174 


Wiens,  H.  J.  (1962).  Atoll  Environment  and  Ecology.   Yale  Young,  C.  A.  ( 1884).  Introduction.  In  Report  of  the  Eclipse 

University  Press,  New  Haven  and  London.  532  pp.  Expedition  to  Caroline  Island  May  Iti83.  Natl.  Acad.  Sri. 

Wilkes.  C.  USN  (1845).     Narrative  of  the  United  States  Mem.  2.  11-20. 

Exploring  Expedition  during  the  years  1838,  1839,  1840,  Young.  J.  L.  (ca.  1922).  Notes  on  Flint,  Caroline  and  Vostock 

1841.  1842.   Phila,  Lea  &  Blanchard.  5  Vols,  and  an  atlas.  Islands.  In  Memoranda  re  Tahitian  Business.  S.R.Maxwell 

Yaldwyn,  J.  C.  &  Wodzicki.  K.  (1979).     Systematics  and  &  Co..  Ltd.,  Pacific  Manuscripts  Bureau,  Research  School  of 

ecology  of  the  land  crabs  (Decapoda:     Coenobitidae,  Pacific  Studies.  Australian  National  University.  Canberra. 

GrapsidaeandGecarcinidaelof  the  Tokelau  Islands,  central  A.  C.  T.  PMB  Manuscript  23.  1-18. 
Pacific.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  235.  1-53. 


175 


Chapter  2: 

INVESTIGATIONS  AND 
ANTHROPOGENIC  ECOLOGY 


Editors: 

SERGEI  M.  CHERNYAK, 

CLIFFORD  P.  RICE,  & 

GREGORY  J.  SMITH 


2.1     Distribution  of  Chlorinated  Hydrocarbons 
in  Ecosystems  of  the  Equatorial  Pacific 

SERGEI  M.  CHERNYAK  and  VALERIYA  M.  VRONSKAYA 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology,  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  and  Academy  of  Sciences,  Moscow,  USSR 


Introduction 

It  is  a  well-known  fact  that  chlorinated  hydrocarbon 
pesticides  (CHP's),  which  earned  their  developers  a  Nobel 
Prize,  have  been  both  a  great  benefit  to  mankind  by  making  it 
possible  to  rescue  up  to  one-half  of  the  world's  cereal-grain 
harvests  from  pests  and  a  detriment  to  the  environment  by  their 
trait  of  extreme  stability  causing  them  to  build  up  in  the 
environment.  In  just  a  few  years,  their  environmental  hazard 
has  become  apparent. 

The  multiplicity  of  pathways  and  the  high  rates  of  CHP 
transport  led  to  a  situation  whereby  in  the  early  1 970' s  they  had 
accumulated  on  a  worldwide  scale,  being  detectable  in  virtually 
all  environments,  including  mountain-peak  glaciers  and  deep- 
ocean  depressions.  Later,  the  world  was  to  see  a  no  less 
extensive  buildup  of  other  classes  of  chlorinated  hydrocarbons 
(CH's).  namely  polychlorinatedbiphenyls(PCB's),  chlorinated 
terpenes,  dioxins,  benzofurans.  et  cetera,  which  were  being 
used  not  only  in  agriculture  but  also  in  various  industries  and 
even  in  health  care  fields. 

Despite  the  fact  that  most  industrialized  countries  had 
invoked  total  or  partial  bans  upon  the  use  of  CH's  in  open-cycle 
processes,  their  production  on  a  global  scale  remains  almost 
undiminished,  since  no  effective  alternative  for  protecting 
agricultural  harvests  in  tropical  countries  has  yet  been  devised. 

There  is  now  a  considerable  body  of  scientific  literature 
indicating  that  the  World  Ocean  is  the  ultimate  repository  for 
CH's.  According  to  the  most  reliable  estimates  (Tanabe. 
1 985 ),  ocean  waters  are  today  the  repository  of  as  much  as  70% 
of  all  the  CH's  ever  released  into  the  environment.  Previous 
studies  (Chemyak  et  al.,  1985b)  showed  that  the  rates  of  CH 
buildup  and  migration  in  constituents  of  the  oceanic  environment 
depend  first  and  foremost  on  the  physicochemical  and 
hydrologic-geographic  characteristics  of  various  portions  of 
the  World  Ocean.  Hence,  predictive  estimates  of  increases  in 
ocean  pollution,  which  are  bound  to  occur  globally,  require 
information  on  the  forms  and  amounts  of  CH's  present  in 
various  media  and  especially  in  little-studied  regions  such  as 
the  Pacific  Ocean,  where  only  a  few  expeditions  have  concerned 
themselves  with  CH's  (Izrael  &  Tsyban,  1989).  Our  own 
recent  studies  (Chernyak&Mikhaleva.  1985a)  were  the  first  to 
include  nearly  in  situ  studies  of  microbial  and  photochemical 
PCB  decomposition  processes,  which  are  the  only  processes 
presently  at  work  to  rid  the  oceanic  environment  of  these 
xenobiotic  substances.  We  were  particularly  interested  in 
investigating  PCB  distribution  at  Caroline  Atoll,  a  coral  island 
remarkable  for  its  diverse  flora  and  fauna,  where  these  CH's 
have  accumulated,  in  markedly  altered  form  and  at  a  distance 


of  many  thousands  of  kilometers  from  their  sources.  Their 
presence  at  these  locations  are  probably  occurring  through 
atmospheric  and  oceanic  transport. 

The  present  paper  sets  out  the  findings  and  conclusions  of 
comprehensive  studies  conducted  in  1988  in  the  equatorial 
Pacific  and  at  Caroline  Atoll,  which  were  obtained  during  the 
First  Joint  US-USSR  Central  Pacific  Expedition  aboard  the 
R/V  Akademik  Korolev. 

Materials  and  Methods 

The  locations  of  the  sampling  stations  are  shown  in  Fig.  1 . 
The  media  sampled  in  order  to  establish  the  specifics  of 
hydrochemical  processes  involving  chlorinated  hydrocarbons 
in  background  regions  of  the  Pacific  and  coral-reef  ecosystems 
were  seawater,  sediment,  plankton,  neuston,  demersal 
organisms,  and  fishes.  Specific  studies  conducted  at  Caroline 
Atoll  also  included  corals,  flora  and  fauna,  and  eggs  of  local 
bird  species. 


100° 

110°    120°    130°     140° 

150°     160°    170°     180° 

170°      160°    150° 

'  HJ 

40 

y4& 

Pacific 

30' 

J<$ 

Ocean 

Hawaiian 
Islands  ^^ 

20' 

\    South  A 
S  China  V>t 

/Sea     ^'jj&iS'^S8™-*- 

V 

10 

%.-'/j 

\ 

Christmas 

*Y      /£*  *>  r-, 

"""■•«,, 

Island    v 

0° 

Vjfoic=£2C-\ 

<b 

"V__             G   a                ^^^\_ 

ip  <a_ 

^^s3*?  Q  ^r 

Caroline 
Aloll 

10 

\                        ^ 

20 

Fig.  1 .     Expedition  route  and  station  locations  in  the  Pacific  Ocean  and  South 
China  Sea  (9  September  to  3!  October  1988). 

Seawater  samples,  100  I  in  volume,  were  filtered  through 
XAD-2  resin  at  the  rate  of  20 1/h.  The  sorbed  CH's  were  eluted 
with  80  ml  of  ethanol  mixed  with  an  equal  volume  of  2% 
sodium  sulfate  solution.  The  water-alcohol  solution  was 
doubly  extracted  with  n-hexane  ( using  25  ml  of  hexane  in  each 
of  the  two  extractions).  The  extracts  were  concentrated  to  a 
volume  of  4-5  ml  using  a  rotary  evaporator,  purified  with 
concentrated  sulfuric  acid,  neutralized  with  a  5%  NaHCO, 
solution,  rinsed  twice,  dried  over  sodium  sulfate,  and 
concentrated  in  a  stream  of  pure  nitrogen  to  a  volume  of  1  ml. 
The  concentrate  was  injected  into  a  Hewlett-Packard  gas 
chromatograph  with  the  aid  of  an  autosampler.  The 
chromatographic   analysis  conditions  were  as  follows: 


179 


fused-quartz  capillary  column,  length  30  m,  and  inside  diameter 
.•I  0.32  mm;  chromatographic  phase  DB-1  (0.25  urn).  The 
temperature  program  lor  the  column  was  initial  temperature. 
1 20  C"  ( I  mini,  rising  to  250  C  at  the  rate  of  5°C/min.  The 
chromatographic  analysis  time  was  40  min.  the  injector 
temperature.  225°C,  and  the  electron-capture  detector 
temperature.  300°C. 

The  sediment  samples  were  centrifuged  for  20  min  at  a 
speed  of  2,000  rpm  to  achieve  total  deposition  of  the  silt.  The 
residue  was  extracted  with  acetone,  then  doubly  extracted  with 
a  3:1  hexane-acetone  mixture.  The  combined  extract  was 
washed  by  mixing  with  an  equal  volume  of  29?  sodium  sulfate 
solution.  The  hexane  layer  was  separated  off,  and  the  aqueous- 
acetone  solution  reextracted  with  additional  hexane.  The 
combined  hexane  extract  was  concentrated,  then  purified,  first 
with  sulfuric  acid  (to  remove  extracted  organic  compounds), 
then  with  tetrabutylammonium  sulfate  (to  remove  any  sulfur 
compounds).  The  purified  solution  was  concentrated  down  to 
I  ml  in  a  stream  of  pure  nitrogen  and  chromatographically 
analyzed.  The  biological  samples  were  crushed  to  obtain  a 
homogeneous  mass,  defatted  with  acetone,  then  treated, 
following  the  procedure  used,  with  sediment  samples. 

In  order  to  investigate  the  effect  of  photochemical  processes 
on  the  behavior  of  CH's  in  background  ecosystems  of  the 
Pacific,  experiments  were  conducted  on  the  decomposition  of 
a  standard  Aroclor  1232  solution  in  waters  drawn  from  the 
equatorial  Pacific  and  around  Caroline  Atoll  under  the  action 
of  sunlight. 

The  experiment  was  run  in  two  5-1  reactor  vessels,  one 
exposed  to  sunlight,  the  other  shielded  using  light-blocking 
foil.  The  surface  area  involved  was  400  cm2.  The  sterilized 
seawater  in  the  reactors  were  spiked  with  an  acetone  solution 
of  Aroclor  1232  to  yield  PCB  concentrations  in  the  water  of 
100  ng/1.  The  samples  were  extracted  with  n-hexane  (twice. 
50  ml  each  time),  then  concentrated  to  a  volume  of  2  ml  in  a 
rotary  evaporator.  They  were  then  purified  with  concentrated 
sulfuric  acid  and  chromatographically  analyzed.  Microbial 
degradation  of  the  PCB  under  the  same  conditions  was 
investigated  for  control  purposes. 

Results  and  Discussion 

Data  on  CH  levels  in  Pacific  Ocean  waters  are  presented 
in  Tables  I  and  2. 

Analysis  of  these  results  clearly  demonstrated  the 
dependence  of  the  distribution  of  various  PCB  components  on 
their  molecular  structure. 

The  distribution  of  hcxachlorocvclohexanc  (HCII)  is 
noteworthy  since  its  total  concentration  was  fairly  high,  though 
it  was  still  several  times  lower  than  in  the  Bering  and  Chukchi 
Seas  (Chernyak  ci  al.,  1002).  which  arc  just  as  far  removed 
from  areas  where  this  compound  continues  to  be  used.  The 
composition  of  the  IICH  mixture  (containing  as  much  as  90'  - 
of  the  (/.-isomer)  indicates  thai  the  sources  of  pollution  are 
probably  equatorial  countries  that  employ  \ast  amounts  of 
technical-grade  hexachloran  on  their  crops.  The  relatively  low 


TABLE  1 

Chlorinated  hydrocarbon  levels  in  the  surface  waters 
of  the  Pacific  (ng/1). 

Chlorinated  Hydrocarbon  Levels 
Station        Total 
Number       HCH  DDT         DDD        DDE         PCB 


Caroline  Atol 

114 

0.02 

0.1 

0.1 

(1.1 

(1.05 

Caroline  Atol 

.  lagoon 

L-l 

0.01 

1.0 

0.5 

0.3 

0.02 

L-2 

0.01 

0.8 

0.3 

0.3 

0.01 

L-3 

0.01 

1.(1 

0.3 

0.5 

0.02 

L-4 

(1.(11 

1.1 

0.3 

0.3 

002 

Phoenix  transect 

1  15 

2.7 

0.07 

0.02 

0.01 

0.2 

1  Id 

2.4 

0.05 

0.01 

0.01 

0.2 

1  17 

2.9 

0.07 

0.01 

0.01 

0.3 

1  IS 

2  "i 

O.OS 

0.02 

0.02 

0.2 

1  19 

2.3 

0.02 

0.01 

0.01 

0.4 

12(1 

2.5 

0.05 

0.02 

0.01 

0.3 

Marianas  transect 

121 

3.0 

0.09 

0.02 

0.01 

0.5 

122 

2.3 

0.12 

0.02 

0.03 

0.3 

123 

2.4 

0.05 

0.01 

0.01 

0.1 

124 

2.4 

0.02 

0.01 

0.02 

0.3 

125 

2.5 

0.01 

0.01 

0.01 

0.4 

126 

2  2 

O.OS 

0.02 

0.01 

0.4 

South  China  5 

ea 

127 

4.2 

0.18 

0.04 

0.02 

0.3 

I2S 

4.5 

OKI 

0.02 

0.03 

0.4 

124 

4.8 

0.10 

0.04 

0.05 

0.3 

130 

3.7 

0.22 

0.10 

0.03 

0.3 

131 

3.3 

0.IS 

DOS 

(Ids 

0.3 

TABLE  2 

Distribution  of  chlorinated  hydrocarbons  over  the  water  column  in 
Pacific  Ocean  waters. 


Chlorinated 

Depth 

llv drocarbon  Leve 

s 

inn 

Total 

HCH 

DDT 

PCB 

Slain 

m  1  1 5 

0 

2.7 

0.10 

0.2 

III 

2.5 

O.OS 

0.2 

100 

2.0 

0.05 

0.2 

1.000 

1.7 

001 

0.2 

Slain 

in  120 

II 

2.5 

oos 

0.3 

10 

2.3 

(KIS 

0.3 

100 

2.1 

0.04 

0.2 

1.000 

IS 

0.04 

0.2 

ISO 


hexachloran  levels  in  the  water  here  are  likely  due  to  their  high 
volatility,  which  appears  to  be  driving  most  of  the  HCH  present 
in  these  hot  climates  into  the  atmospheric  compartment. 

The  rather  unusual  distribution  of  HCH  within  the  water 
column — that  is,  the  marked  drop  in  its  level  that  occurs  at 
considerable  depths — is  explained  by  the  relatively  high 
solubility  of  this  pollutant  in  seawater  and  by  the  fact  that  it  is 
present  largely  in  dissolved  form  (in  contrast  to  other  globally- 
occurring  CH's.  which  are  largely  sorbed  and  precipitate 
together  with  suspended  matter).  Hexachlorocyclohexane 
isomers  are  practically  the  only  common  pollutants  whose 
behaviorin  the  open  ocean  can  be  explained  largely  on  the  basis 
of  hydrochemical  factors. 

Also  worthy  of  note  is  the  fact  that  there  was  almost  a 
twofold  lower  concentration  level  of  HCH  in  the  waters  of  the 
atoll  lagoon  versus  the  ocean  water  surrounding  the  lagoon. 
The  only  obvious  explanation  was  the  presence  of  a  temperature 
gradient,  which  entailed  differing  rates  of  photochemical  and 
microbial  transformation  of  the  cyclohexane  ring,  and  the 
accelerated  evaporation  that  was  taking  place  in  the  lagoon. 

Another  interesting  finding  was  that  the  lagoon  water  of 
Caroline  Atoll  contained  roughly  one-half  as  much  PCB  as  did 
the  surrounding  ocean  water.  Moreover,  the  composition  of 
the  CH's  was  significantly  different:  the  lagoon  water  contained 
virtually  no  highly  chlorinated  PCB  congeners,  which  was 
probably  due  to  the  higher  rates  of  photochemical  processes  in 
the  thoroughly  heated  shallow  water  of  the  lagoon.  It  should  be 
noted,  however,  that  as  a  general  rule,  PCB  levels  in  the 
equatorial  Pacific  were  only  slightly  lower  than  in  the  northern 
Pacific,  even  though  sample  composition  turned  out  to  be 
considerably  different. 

Whereas  most  of  the  PCB' s  in  the  Bering  Sea  consisted  of 
di-  and  trichlorobiphenyls,  the  major  constituents  of  PCB's 
in  the  equatorial  waters  were  tri-  and  tetrachlorobiphenyls 
as  well  as  heptachlorobiphenyls.  Analysis  of  the  CH's  sorbed 
by  suspended  matter  revealed  a  clear  dependence  of  pollutant 
levels  on  latitude.  For  example,  the  content  of  HCH  isomers  in 
suspensions  from  the  equatorial  Pacific  was  almost  50  times 
lower  than  in  the  circumpolar  parts  of  the  ocean  (Table  3 ).  This 
may  have  been  due  to  the  significant  shift  in  sorption-process 
equilibria  associated  with  a  25°C  rise  in  temperature.  There 
was  a  marked  (almost  tenfold)  change  in  PCB  levels  in 
suspended  matter,  whereas  the  levels  in  the  water  layer  remained 
virtually  constant.  It  is  a  curious  fact  that  the  equatorial  Pacific 
is  a  unique  region  of  the  World  Ocean  where  the  PCB  mixture 
appears  to  be  equally  apportioned  between  the  suspended 
matter  and  the  dissolved  phase. 

Of  special  interest  is  the  distribution  of  the  extensively 
used  pesticide  DDT  in  Pacific  Ocean  ecosystems.  Dichloro- 
dipheny  ltrichloroethane  levels  in  water  samples  from  the  Bering 
and  Chukchi  Seas  have  decreased  considerably  over  the  past 
decade  due  to  restrictions  on  the  use  of  this  compound  imposed 
by  a  number  of  industrialized  countries.  In  fact,  in  some 
instances  these  levels  come  close  to  analytical  zero  (Chernyak 
et  al..  1989).    In  the  equatorial  Pacific,  however,  the  DDT 


TABLE  3 

Chlorinated  hydrocarbon  levels  (Ug/g  dry  weight)  in  suspended 
matter  in  the  Pacific  Ocean. 


Station 

Date 

Depth 

Chi 

urinated 

Hydrocai 

•bon 

No. 

(m) 

a-HCH 

Y-HCH 

DDT 

PCB 

113 

09/2 1 

0 

54 

43 

135 

258 

Caroline 

09/23-29 

0 

5 

5 

174 

31  1 

Atoll 

116 

10/02 

20 

5 

4 

164 

101 

116 

10/02 

100 

5 

5 

105 

126 

119 

10/04 

65 

5 

4 

192 

168 

119 

10/04 

100 

3 

3 

127 

171 

119 

10/11 

0 

5 

3 

167 

315 

120 

10/11 

0 

5 

5 

103 

153 

120 

10/11 

0 

4 

4 

143 

93 

120 

10/12 

0 

3 

4 

215 

139 

120 

10/13 

0 

5 

4 

287 

189 

120 

10/14 

0 

5 

4 

274 

63 

120 

10/15 

0 

3 

3 

159 

76 

121 

10/16 

0 

5 

3 

315 

154 

121 

10/17 

0 

4 

3 

252 

127 

122 

10/18 

0 

4 

4 

338 

129 

122 

10/18 

130 

3 

3 

309 

85 

123 

0 

5 

3 

421 

1X1 

124 

0 

5 

4 

357 

108 

hazard  remains  considerable:  its  levels  average  0. 1  ng/1,  which 
is  typical  of  the  areas  most  severely  impacted  by  human 
activities,  namely  the  North  Atlantic  and  the  Indian  Ocean 
(Tanabe  etal..  1982). 

Results  for  the  microbial  and  photochemical  degradation 
of  PCB's  in  the  equatorial  Pacific  are  presented  in  Figs.  2-4. 
The  gradual  loss  of  several  of  the  PCB  congeners  are  plotted 
over  time  in  Fig.  2.  On  incubation  with  natural  populations  of 
microbes  from  these  central  Pacific  waters,  some  congeners 
were  reduced  by  more  than  50%  in  10  days  (e.g.,  BZ#s. 
Ballschmitter  and  Zell  numbering  system  for  PCB  congeners: 
Ballschmitter&Zell,  1980)7,  16. 49, 52,  and 42.  In  Fig.  3,  the 
degree  of  microbial  degradation  of  the  PCB's  is  organized  by 
the  PCB  homologue  group.  From  this  presentation  it  is 
observed  that  the  greater  the  degree  of  chlorine  substitution  of 
the  bipheny  1  ring,  the  more  resistant  it  is  to  microbial  breakdown. 
Plotted  for  comparison  are  the  relative  rates  of  breakdown  of 
the  homologous  groups  for  the  two  regions  that  were  studied, 
the  Bering  Sea.  and  the  central  Pacific  Ocean.  Between  these 
two  locations,  the  rates  of  degradation  of  especially  the  mono- 
and  dichlorobiphenyl  homologues  are  faster  in  the  warmer 
water  of  the  Pacific.  Figure  4  presents  the  times  loss  of  total 
PCB's  for  the  central  Pacific  based  on  a  comparison  between 
microbial  degradation,  photochemical  degradation,  and 
photochemical  processes  under  the  influence  of  added  PAH's. 
It  is  apparent  here  that  microbial  degradation  accounts  for  most 
of  the  breakdown  in  this  area  and  that  PAH's  may  have  the 
capacity  to  inhibit  photochemical  breakdown  of  PCB's. 


Percentage  ot  initial  PCB  concentration 


1         2        3       4       5       6       7 


Fig.2       Photochemical  breakdown  of  individual  PCB  component1. 
A 


Fig. 4.  Breakdown  of  PCB's  (dichlorobiphenyls)  through  microbial  and 
photochemical  action:  1)  microbial;  2)  photochemical:  3)  photo- 
chemical in  the  presence  of  PAH's. 


Conclusions 

As  a  result  of  human  activities,  chlorinated  hydrocarbons 
occur  in  all  media  constituting  the  Pacific  ecosystems 
investigated.  Levels  of  HCH  isomers  in  the  equatorial  Pacific 
turned  out  to  be  lower  than  in  polar  areas.  This  is  understandable, 
given  the  high  volatility  of  this  pollutant. 
Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane  levels  in  certain  parts  of  the 
Pacific  (such  as  the  Caroline  Atoll)  were  found  to  be  similar  to 
those  observed  in  impacted  basins,  although  the  concentration 
of  this  compound  in  the  equatorial  Pacific  taken  as  a  whole 
were  not  high.  Polychlorinated  biphenyls  occurred  in  all  the 
water  samples  studied.  It  is  now  clear  that  despite  the  slowness 
of  photochemical  and  microbial  breakdown  of  PCBs,  these 
processes  nevertheless  play  an  important  role  in  the  self- 
purification  of  Pacific  Ocean  ecosystems. 


Fig. 3.     Microbial  breakdou  n  of  PCB  components  in  the  waters  of  the  Bering 
Set  (A)  and  central  Pacific  Ocean  (B). 


2.2     Distribution  of  Polycyclic  Aromatic 
Hydrocarbons 


EHA  R.  URBAS.  NATALYA  I.  IRHA,  and  UVE  E.  KIRSO 

Chemistry  Institute  of  the  Estonian  Academy  of  Sciences,  Tallinn,  ESSR 


Introduction 

Three  distinct  regions  (Caroline  Atoll,  tropical  Pacific  and 
South  China  Sea)  during  the  First  Joint  US-USSR  Central 
Pacific  ( BERPAC)  Expedition  were  sampled  and  analyzed  for 
polycyclic  aromatic  hydrocarbons  (PAH's).  Methods  for 
collection  and  analyses  are  described  in  Distribution  of  PAH's 
( Irha  et  al. ,  1 992)  in  Results  of  the  Third  Joint  US-USSR  Bering 
&  Chukchi  Seas  Expedition  (BERPAC),  Summer  1988  (Nagel, 
1992).  The  regions  that  were  sampled  are  identified  in  the 
Frontispiece  to  this  volume. 

Polychlorinated  aromatic  hydrocarbons  are  important 
natural  and  anthropogenic  contaminants  of  marine  ecosystems. 
These  compounds  are  associated  with  petroleum  pollution, 
including  natural  oil  seepage,  and  with  industrial  contamination 
and  many  exhibit  carcinogenic  and  mutagenic  properties.  In 
this  paper,  the  presence  and  quantity  of  PAH's  in  both  biotic 
and  abiotic  components  of  tropical  Pacific  ecosystems  is 
reported. 

Results 

Caroline  Atoll 

Determinations  were  made  of  the  composition  and 
distribution  of  PAH's  (Table  1 )  present  in  water  and  marine- 
organism  suspensions  sampled  in  inshore  waters  off  the  atoll, 
as  well  as  in  the  following  media:  bottom  sand,  island  soils, 
corals,  and  siphonales  algae.  The  findings  (Table  2)  indicated 
that  the  PAH  pollution  of  this  ecosystem  was  negligible.  There 
were  no  PAH's  in  samples  of  surface  sand  from  the  atoll,  and 
the  soils  taken  from  a  palm  tree  forest  area  showed  PAH  levels 
below  background. 

The  total  PAH  content  of  coral  samples  did  not  exceed 
9.6  |ag/kg  of  dry  weight.  The  following  representatives  of 
four-  and  five-ring  PAH's  were  detected:  benzo(e)pyrene 
(BeP),  62.5;  indeno(  l,2,3-cd)pyrene  (IPy),  23;  benzo(a)pyrene 
(BaP).  14.5  (in  percent  by  weight). 

The  benthic  sand  of  the  atoll  lagoons  contained  four-  and 
five-ring  PAH's  (Table  2);  the  major  constituents  (in  percent 
by  weight  of  the  total  amount  of  PAH's  present)  were 
benzo(b)fluoranthene  (BbF),  from  38.7  to  53.6%;  and  BaP, 
from  16.8  to  36.6%  (Fig.  1). 

The  surface  waters  off  the  atoll  contained  six  four-  and 
five-ring  PAH's,  whose  total  amount  did  not  exceed 
1.55  ng/1,  the  dominant  constituents  being  the  five-ring 
carcinogens  BbF  and  BaP  (Fig.  2).  Suspended  matter  sampled 


Table  1 

List  of  specific  PAH's  identified  by  displacemenl-eludonal  liquid 

chromatog 

raphy 

Name 

Symbol 

Structural  formula 

Carcinogenicity 
(Lee  e/u/.,  1981) 

Pyrene 

Py 

£9 

0 

Chrysene 

Chr 

oS° 

+ 

Benz(  a  (anthracene 

BaA 

ocx9 

+ 

Benzol  etpyrene 

BeP 

& 

0/+ 

Benzol  blfluoranthene 

BbF 

^3 

++ 

Benzol  k  )fluoranthenc 
Benzo(a)pyrene 

BkF 
BaP 

cab 
cxA 

++ 
++ 

Benzo(g.h,i)perylene 

BPer 

cfi? 

+ 

Dibenzla.h  (anthracene 

DBA 

€8 

+ 

Indenol  1,2.3-cdlpyrene 

IPy 

go9 

+ 

Note: 
Classification 

Svmbol 

Criterion:  %  of  animals 

that  de\clopcJ  lesions 

noncarcinogenic 
weakly  carcinogenic 
strongly  carcinogenic 

0 

+ 
++ 

0 
33 
>31 

at  a  depth  of  90  m  included  four  kinds  of  four-  and  five-ring 
PAH's,  whose  total  concentration  was  0.68  ng/1,  with  the  four- 
ring  IPy  and  benz(a)anthracene  (BaA)  predominating  (Fig.  2). 

The  total  PAH  level  in  the  gills  of  Mexican  (northern  red, 
Pensacola)  snapper  {Lutjanus  campechanus)  specimens  was 
moderate,  amounting  to  0.08  |ig/kg;  the  corresponding  value 
for  muscle  tissue  was  1.13  Hg/kg  of  fresh  weight. 

The  following  five-ring  PAH's  were  identified  as  present 
in  the  gills  (in  percent  by  weight):  BbF.  62.5;  BaP,  33.5; 
benzo(k)fluoranfhene  (BkF),  3.7;  moreover,  chrysene  (Chr) 
and  benzophenanthrene  (Bp)  were  also  present.  The  main 
constituents  of  the  total  PAH  mix  were  four-ring  compounds: 
BaA,  88.5%,  and  Chr,  1 1.5%;  also  present  were  traces  of  BbF 
and  BkF. 

Polycylic  aromatic  hydrocarbon  levels  in  various 
components  of  the  Caroline  Atoll  ecosystems  indicated  that 
this  area  was  only  slightly  polluted  by  these  specific  compounds. 


183 


TABLE 2 

PAH  le\cls  in  particular  media  of  the  Caroline  Atoll  ecosystem 
(September  1988). 

Medium  Units  Py  BaA    Bnf    BkF    BaP    Bep 

Cm- 


Water,  surface      ng/1    qualitatively     tr. 


>5    0.90    0.21      ir. 


layer 

present 

Suspension 

ng/1 

0.6 

0.8 

tr. 

tr. 

- 

(90m) 

Benthic  sand. 

u/kg 

-     .. 

- 

- 

- 

- 

lagoon 

Lagoon  I 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Lagoon  III 

- 

tr.      0.44 

0.08 

0.30 

- 

1  agoon  V 

- 

0.60    0.60 

0.09 

0.26 

- 

Atoll  soil 

u/kg 

- 

- 

- 

0.83 

- 

Aeropora  corals 

u/kg 

2  2 

- 

- 

1.4 

6.6 

Siphonales  algae 

u/kg 

- 

- 

- 

0.07 

- 

(Caulerpaceae) 

ir.  -  trace 

06 


0  2 


(b) 


n 


n 


BaA    BbF     BkF    BaP 


BaA     BbF     BkF    BaP 


Fig.  I      PAH  levels  lu/kgi  in  henlhic  sand  of  lagoons  V  (a)  and  111  (hi  "I 
Caroline  Atoll  (September  1988) 
|1  egend:]  A  =  PAH  level,  u/kg. 


1.0 


u  0.5 
X 

< 

a. 


0  1 
0 


(a) 


(b) 


n 


n 


Py  BaA  BbF  BkF  BaP  BeP 


Py   BaA   BkF  BaP 


i  l  ontentol  PAH's  (ng/1)  and  their  distribution  (in  percent  bj  weight) 

in  the  surface  (0  0.5  m)  layer  ol  watei  (a)  and  inasuspension(b)drawn 
from  a  depth  <>i  90  m  ofl  Caroline  \toll  (September  1988) 
[Legend:!  A  =  I>AII  level,  ng/1 


Tropical  Pacific 

Polycyclic  aromaitc  hydrocarbon  levels  in  the  surface 
w  aters  were  not  high.  In  the  open  ocean,  the  total  concentrations 
ranged  from  0.8  to  43.8  ng/1,  with  a  maximum  of  396.6  ng/1  in 
the  Marianas  sector.  The  composition  and  distribution  of  the 
PAH's  identified  in  the  surface  waters  of  the  open  ocean 
indicated  that  the  main  compounds  present  were  the  following 
five-ring  carcinogens  (in  percent  by  weight):  BbF.  86.3:  BkF, 
1 1 .0;  BaA  and  Chr.  1 .2;  BeP.  1 .0;  BaP.  0.5:  and  IPy  was  present 
qualitatively. 

The  total  PAH's  present  in  the  waters  of  the  Marianas 
sector  were  1 0  to  1 00  times  higher  in  concentration  than  in  the 
open  ocean.  The  dominant  compounds  were  four-  and  five- 
ring  PAH's  ( in  percent  by  weight),  namely  BaA  and  Chr.  38.7; 
BeP, 35.2; andpyrene(Py), 22.7.  TheBbFandBaPconstnuted 
3.2%  and  0.2%  by  weight,  respectively. 

In  areas  where  PAH  levels  in  the  water  were  below  the 
sensitivity  threshold  of  the  liquid  chromatography  technique 
employed,  a  more  sensitive  method  for  just  BaP  was  employed. 
Benzol  a  (pyrene  is  useful  as  a  representative  tracer  of  other 
PAH's  (analytical  methods  described  in  Irhae/o/..  1992).  The 
following  BaP  levels  were  noted:  up  to  0.58  ng/1  in  the  open 
ocean  and  up  to  1.36  ng/1  in  the  Marianas  sector. 

Unlike  the  surface  layer  of  water,  suspended  matter  sampled 
in  the  tropical  Pacific  was  found  to  contain  as  many  as  10  lour- 
to  six-ring  PAH's.  All  samples  taken  at  depths  of  0, 20. 58, 80. 
1 30.  and  200  m  contained  the  PAH's  IPy,  BaA,  Chr,  BbF.  BkF, 
and  BaP.  the  dominant  ones  being  IPy  and  BaA.  which  accounted 
for  30-99%  and  30-50%.  respectively,  of  the  total  amount 
present.  In  certain  instances,  suspensions  from  \  arums  depths 
also  contained  IPy  and  benzo(g,h,i)perylene  ( BPen. 

Bottom  sediments  of  the  tropical  Pacific  were  found  to 
contain  only  three  kinds  of  four-  and  five-ring  PAH's.  namely 
BaA,  BbF.  and  BaP.  with  the  total  PAH  content  not  exceeding 
4.5  Ug/kg.  The  dominant  PAH  (by  weight)  was  BbF,  which 
accounted  for  93%  of  the  total  amount  of  PAH's  present. 
Although  the  composition  of  PAH' s  in  the  bottom  sediments  of 
the  Marianas  sector  of  the  Pacific  was  similar.  IPy  and  BbF 
were  the  dominant  PAH's  (50.7%  and  47.3'  - .  respectively,  of 
the  total  weight  of  PAH's  present). 

South  China  Sea 

Polycyclic  aromatic  hydrocarbon  levels  in  the  waters  of 
the  South  China  Sea  were  much  higher  than  in  the  open  ocean 
and  in  the  Marianas  sector  (Table  3).  The  total  amount  of 
PAH's  in  the  water  \  aried  w  idel) :  the  PAH  mixture  identified 
in  the  surface  microlayer  consisted  largely  of  four-  and  five- 
ring  PAH's  (in  percent  by  weight):  BeP.  45.5:  BaA  and  Chr. 
28.7:  Py .  24.6;  BbF,  0.9;  and  BaP.  0.2.  Their  weight  ratios  and 
composition  in  the  surface  layer  were  somewhat  different 
(Table  3 ).  moving  tow  aids  increased  fractions  of  BaA  and  Chr. 
and  BeP.  Considerably  higher  levels  of  PAH's.  by  weight. 
were  delected  in  the  benthic  portion  of  the  water  column,  the 
dominant  I>  All  being  BbF  (Table  3). 

In  those  sea  areas  where  the  PAH  level  fell  below  the 
analytical  detection  limit,  the  BaP  level  did  not  exceed 
1.58  ng/1. 


184 


TABLE  3 

PAH  levels  in  particular  media  of  the  South  China  Sea  ecosystems  (Station  127.  September  1988). 


Medium 


Units 


Pv 


BaA  BeP  BbF  BkF  BaP  IPy  BPer         DBA 


Water,  surface  ng/1        qualitativel) 

microlayer  present 


170  67 


4.5 


Water,  surface  ng/1 

layer  (0  to  0.5  m) 


150 


175 


278 


5.5 


1.6 


Benthic  layer  ng/1        qualitatively         290 

present 


290 


14,000 


300 


Benthic  sediment     u/kg 


0.46  0.14  0.15 


Neusum 


u/kg 


1.4 


1.7 


.3  0.6  0.1 


Suspension. 
58  m 


ns/1 


4.7 


0.6 


0.9  0.06  0.01  0.07  tr.  0.07  tr. 


Suspension, 
80  m 


ng/1 


0.6 


0.4 


0.01 


0.04 


tr. 


0.06 


Hydroids 


trace 


u/kg 


6.5 


0.6 


0.7 


The  total  PAH  level  in  the  suspended  matter  drawn  from 
depths  of  58  and  80  m  were  6.4  and  3.9  ng/1.  respectively 
(Table  3).  The  PAH  mix  was  found  to  contain  ten  four-  to 
six-ring  PAH' s  in  the  following  relative  amounts  (in  percent  by 
weight):  IPy.  65.2;  BeP.  17.4;  BaA  and  Chr.  1  1.0;  BeP.  1.0; 
BPer.  1.0:  BbF.  0.9;  BkF.0.2;  and  IPy  anddibenz(a.h (anthracene 
(DBA)  were  present  in  trace  amounts. 

The  sediment  samples  contained  three  five-ring 
carcinogenic  PAH's  (Table  3),  namely  BbF.  BkF.  and  BaP. 
The  total  PAH  content  of  the  sediment  did  not  exceed 
0.75  (ig/kg  of  dry  weight,  the  dominant  constituent  being  BbF 
(61.3%  of  the  total  content  by  weight). 

The  PAH  mix  detected  in  the  marine  biota  indicated  that 
PAH's  were  fairly  abundant.  The  total  PAH  content  of  the 
neuston  of  the  South  China  Sea  was  6.6  ug/kg  (Table  3).  The 
mix  consisted  of  six  PAH's.  Most  of  the  total  amount  was  made 
up  of  four- and  five-ring  compounds  (i.e..  BaA.  BeP.  BbF.  and 
BaP). 

It  should  be  noted  that  the  PAH  mix  detected  in  the  marine 
hydroids  was  similar  to  that  found  in  the  sediment  (Table  3 )  and 
consisted  of  strongly  carcinogenic  five-ring  compounds,  namely 
BbF.  BaP.  and  BkF.  Their  total  content  in  the  hydroids  was 
10  times  that  in  the  sediment,  and  the  weight  ratios  reflected  a 


larger  fraction  of  BbF.  83.3%.  The  relative  content  of  BaP  and 
BkF  was  8.9%  and  7.6%,  respectively.  The  same  carcinogenic 
PAH's  were  detected  in  benthic  organisms  (Petrosia  sponges. 
Table  4). 

TABLE  4 

Comparative  PAH  levels  in  sponge  tissues  (u/kg  of  dry  weight) 

and  fish  livers  (u/kg  of  fresh  weight)  from  the  South  China  Sea  ( 1 ) 

and  Bering  Sea  (2). 


PAH 

1 

2 

Sponge    SI 

lark  liver* 

n  =  2 

Spongt 

:      Liver  of 
walleye  pollack 

Chr 

_ 

6.15 

_ 

34.00 

BbF 

0.70 

0.27 

0.90 

4.50 

BkF 

0.09 

0.22 

0.16 

tr. 

BaP 

0.40 

1.00 

0.60 

13.00 

BaA 

qualitatively 
present 

1.00 

- 

qualitatively 
present 

BPer 


2.80 


Specimens  caught  in  the  tropical  Pacific. 


185 


It  may  be  noted  that  the  total  content  and  mix  of  PAH's 
present  in  the  tissues  of  South  China  Sea  sponges  was  not  much 
different  from  those  established  for  the  same  aquatic  organisms 
in  the  Bering  Sea  (Table  4).  The  predominant  PAH's 
(in  percent  by  weight)  for  South  China  Sea  and  Bering  Sea 
sponges  were  BbF  (54  and  59)  and  BaP  (36  and  33.6), 
respectively. 

Concentrations  of  PAH's  in  livers  of  sharks  ranged  from 
1.2  to  10.2  (ig/kg  of  fresh  weight  (Table  4).  The  predominant 
compounds  were  the  following  four-  and  five-ring  PAH's 


(in  percent  by  weight):  Chr,  53.7;  BPer,  24.7;  BaA.  8.7;  BaP, 
8.7;  BbF,  2.3;  and  BkF,  1.9. 

For  comparison  we  note  that  the  levels  and  distribution  of 
PAH's  in  aquatic  organisms  of  the  Bering  Sea  (sponges  and 
walleye-pollack  liver)  also  indicate  relatively  high  total  PAH's 
in  fish  livers  and  the  buildup  of  the  strong  carcinogens  BbF, 
BaP,  and  BkF  as  the  dominant  PAH's  in  sponges  (Table  4). 

Analysis  of  the  findings  of  the  present  study  points  to 
severe  petroleum  hydrocarbon  pollution  of  the  sea  and  to  the 
buildup  of  the  carcinogenic  PAH's — BbF  and  BaP — in  some 
aquatic  organisms. 


2.3     The  Occurrence  and  Microbial 

Transformation  of  Benzo(a)pyrene  in  the 
Waters  of  the  Tropical  Pacific  (Caroline 
Atoll,  Line  Islands,  Phoenix  Islands 
Transect,  South  China  Sea) 

YURIY  L.  VOLODKOVICH  and  OLGA  L.  BELYAEVA 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology,  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  and  Academy  of  Sciences,  Moscow;  USSR 


Introduction 

Among  the  numerous  organic  pollutants  working  to 
produce  dangerous  and  undesirable  changes  in  the  chemical 
and  biological  status  of  the  marine  environment,  polycyclic 
aromatic  hydrocarbons  (PAH's)  of  both  natural  and  human 
origin  must  be  singled  out  as  being  particularly  noxious. 
Exhibiting  considerable  molecular  stability,  as  well  as 
pronounced  carcinogenic  and  mutagenic  properties,  compounds 
of  this  series  are  a  serious  hazard  to  marine  life.  At  present, 
researchers  have  been  choosing  ben7.o(a)pyrene  (BaP)  as  an 
indicator  of  environmental  pollution  by  PAH's. 

Benzo(a)pyrene  and  other  PAH's  have  been  found  to 
occur  in  many  marine  ecosystem  components  from  the  arctic 
latitudes  (Volodkovich  &  Belyaeva,  1987)  all  the  way  to  the 
Antarctic,  affecting  mariculture  and  other  activities. 

The  proximity  of  human  sources  of  pollution  has  a  powerful 
impact  on  the  marine  environment,  increasing  BaP  levels  in 
waters  by  factors  ranging  from  tens  to  hundreds  (Tsyban  et  ai, 
1985b;  Tsyban  ef  a/.,  1986). 

For  example.  BaP  levels  in  some  parts  of  Los  Angeles 
harbor  have  reached,  and  even  exceeded.  IIS  ng/1.  while 
concentrations  in  the  top  0.5  m  of  the  water  column  in  the 
equatorial  Pacific  have  been  reported  in  the  1-6  ng/1  range 
(Shilina,  1982). 


In  view  of  the  fact  that  elevated  PAH  levels  in  seawater  are 
due  largely  to  the  proximity  of  a  given  sea  area  to  pollution 
sources,  the  study  of  BaP  circulation  and  elimination  processes 
(including  microbial  transformation)  in  as  yet  unimpacted 
open  sea  and  open  ocean  areas  is  of  considerable  interest  and 
value. 

Microorganisms,  which  are  virtually  ubiquitous  in  the 
World  Ocean,  play  a  major  role  in  the  functioning  of  marine 
ecosystems  and  in  the  biochemical  cycling  of  various 
compounds,  including  pollutants  such  as  petroleum  crude  and 
PAH's  (Izrael  &  Tsyban,  1989).  The  processes  involved  in  the 
microbial  transformation  of  aromatic  hydrocarbons  and 
heterocyclic  compounds  have  been  investigated  in  sufficient 
detail.  On  the  other  hand,  the  rates  of  microbial  degradation  of 
BaP  in  the  marine  environment,  as  well  as  the  local  and 
regional  scale  of  these  processes,  have  thus  far  been  neglected 
(Tsyban  et  ai,  1986). 

Integrated  studies  of  biogeochemical  cycling  of  PAH's. 
using  BaP  as  an  example,  were  performed  in  1988  during  the 
cruise  of  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev  as  an  extension 
of  work  begun  in  1981  in  the  South  China  Sea  and  the 
Marianas  sector.  The  research  represented  the  first  time  that 
such  work  has  been  undertaken  in  the  tropical  Pacific  (in  the 
Caroline  Atoll  area  and  the  Line  Islands/Phoenix 
Islands  transect). 


186 


Methods 

Sampling 

The  studies  were  performed  on  both  rainwaterand  seawater 
samples  taken  from  a  variety  of  depths  ranging  from  the  surface 
down  to  the  benthic  portion  of  the  water  column.  Also 
investigated  were  natural  bacterioplankton  communities  in 
surface  and  near-surface  layers. 

Seawater  samples  were  taken  with  Niskin  bottles. 
Rainwater  samples  were  collected  in  vessels  of  surface  area 
0.5  m:  mounted  near  the  bow  of  the  vessel.  The  BaP  present  in 
the  water  was  extracted  from  1-1  samples  by  triple  benzene 
extraction.  Final  processing  and  analysis  of  1 00  ml  volumes  of 
benzene  extract  of  BaP  were  carried  out  ashore  upon  completion 
of  the  cruise. 

Seawater  samples  for  use  in  the  microbiological 
experiments  were  taken  using  sterile  sampling  equipment 
(a  5- 1  plastic  Niskin  bottle,  and  a  5-1  glass  bottle,  in  the  case  of 
Caroline  Atoll  lagoon).  The  water  samples  containing  natural 
microorganism  communities  were  decanted  into  glass  bottles 
under  sterile  conditions.  Further  processing  was  carried  out  in 
the  shipboard  microbiology  lab. 

The  In  Situ  Experiments  to  Assess  the  Biodegradation  Potential 
of  Seawater  Microflora  in  Relation  to  BaP 

The  process  involved  in  the  microbial  transformation  of 
BaP  was  studied  under  the  conditions  similar  to  the  in  situ 
experiments.  These  involved  placing  250-ml  samples 
containing  natural  microflora  communities  in  dark  glass  bottles 
of  volume  0.5  1.  A  weighed  amount  of  BaP  dissolved  in  a 
minimum  quantity  of  acetone  (0.05  ml )  was  added  to  the  bottles 
immediately  after  addition  of  the  water  ( the  acetone  evaporated 
within  a  few  minutes).  The  transformation  process  was 
simulated  in  runs  using  BaP  concentrations  of  2  and  10|ig/l.  In 
order  to  allow  for  abiotic  factors,  each  experiment  included  a 
control  in  the  form  of  a  sample  of  sterile  water  drawn  from  the 
same  depth  and  containing  the  same  concentration  of  BaP. 
Each  complete  pair  of  tests  (experiment  plus  control)  was  run 
three  times. 

In  order  to  make  the  conditions  of  the  in  situ  experiments 
as  close  as  possible  to  natural,  the  series  of  glass  vessels  were 
placed  in  baths  with  running  water  from  the  surrounding  sea, 
with  the  baths  themselves  mounted  on  the  deck  of  the  research 
vessel.  In  the  case  of  the  Caroline  Atoll,  the  sample-containing 
vessels  were  placed  in  a  plastic  cassette  placed  on  the  bottom 
of  the  lagoon  (at  a  depth  of  8  m).  Exposure  equaled  5-7  days, 
depending  on  the  seawater  temperature.  On  completion  of 
exposure,  the  microbial  activities  were  terminated  by  adding 
several  milliliters  of  concentrated  hydrochloric  acid  to  the 
sample.  The  residual  BaP  in  the  experimental  and  control 
samples  were  extracted  using  benzene.  The  final  BaP 
concentration  values  were  determined  ashore. 

Chemical  Analysis 


Quantitative  determinations  of  the  residual  BaP  levels  in 
the  seawater  samples  involved  concentrating  the  resulting 
benzene  extracts  down  to  a  volume  of  1  ml  and  then  analyzing 
them  on  alumina  plates  using  thin  layer  chromatography  with 
heptane-benzene-acetone  (100:60:6.7,  by  volume)  as  the 
solvent  system.  The  BaP-containing  area  of  the  adsorbent  was 
eluted  with  acetone,  after  which  the  BaP  was  transferred  to 
n-octane. 

The  benzene  extracts  of  BaP  that  were  obtained  in  the 
microbial  experiments  were  treated  without  chromatographic 
thin-layer  separation.  The  evaporated  portion  of  the  benzene 
extracts  were  eluted  with  2-ml  solutions  of  n-octane  containing 
1  x  10 7  g/ml  of  1,12-benzopyrelene,  which  was  used  as  an 
internal  standard. 

Quantitative  determinations  of  BaP  (in  n-octane  solution) 
were  made  by  a  fluorescence-spectrum  analysis  method,  relying 
on  the  Shpolsky  effect  (Shpolsky  et  al.,  1952;  Fedoseeva  & 
Khesina.  1968).  The  analyses  were  performed  with  a  DFS- 12 
spectrograph  at  a  temperature  of -196°C  using  supplementary 
standards  (BaP  and  othercompounds).  The  minimum  sensitivity 
of  the  method  for  BaP  was  1  x  10  '"  g/ml,  with  error  brackets 
of  10%. 

The  simulated  rates  for  microbiological  degradation  were 
determined  from  the  difference  between  the  initial  (introduced) 
and  the  final  (remaining)  mass  of  BaP  in  the  separate  reactors. 

Results  and  Discussion 

The  first  series  of  studies  concerned  the  equatorial  Pacific 
(Fig.  1 )  in  the  rectangle  bounded  by  7°  and  0°S  and  150°  and 
1 80°W.  Analysis  of  the  findings  showed  that  BaP  levels  in  the 
waters  of  the  Line  Islands/Phoenix  Islands  transect  were 
remarkable  for  their  extreme  purity.  Benzo(a)pyrene  levels  in 
the  waters  of  the  transect  down  to  depths  of  2.000  m 
corresponded  to  the  minimal  background  value  of  1  ng/1  and 
lower.  Certain  samples  contained  no  detectable  amount  of  BaP 
whatever  (Table  1 ).  Thus,  the  average  BaP  level  for  the  entire 
water  column  at  Station  1 17  was  just  0.06,  0.018  ng/1.  In  the 
majority  of  cases,  the  BaP  levels  did  not  exceed  5  ng/1.  As  seen 
in  Fig.  2,  zones  with  elevated  BaP  levels  were  of  a  local 
character.  High  levels  were  recorded  for  depths  of 
1,000-1,500  m  (6.5  and  1 1.3  ng/1,  respectively),  with  only  one 
instance  (10.3  ng/1.  Station  1 18)  of  a  high  concentration  in  the 
top  0.5  m  of  the  water  column.  It  must  be  emphasized  that  the 
peak  levels  recorded  were  a  whole  order  of  magnitude  lower 
than  BaP  levels  in  open  ocean  and  other  portions  of  the  Pacific 
as  found  in  earlier  studies  (Izrael&Tsyban,  1989).  The  limited 
occurrence  and  low  levels  of  BaP  buildup  in  seawater  along  the 
Line/Phoenix  transect  may  be  attributed  not  only  to  the 
remoteness  of  this  geographic  region  from  the  principal  human 
sources  of  pollution  (industrialized  areas  and  shipping  routes) 
but  also  to  the  absence  of  any  pronounced  PAH  flows  in  this 
ultraoligotrophic  part  of  the  ocean.  Nor  does  economic  activity 
in  the  waters  of  the  Kiribati  Republic  archipelago  appear  to  be 
having  any  significant  deleterious  effect  on  this  marine 
environment. 


187 


100'      110"     120      130       140' 

150c     160°     170° 

180:     170       160      150c 

5    sr^ 

\    South  A 
S  China  \2>t 
("V/Sea        %*' 
"Vs.  .-jo       ^> 

Pacific 
Ocean 

Hawaiian 

Islands  t*^) 
i 

Christmas 
-..•3             Island    n 

if>* 

Caroline 

a 

0                               Atoll 

«0 

Fig.  1 .     Expedition  route  and  station  locations  in  the  Pacific  Ocean  and  South 
China  Sea  (9  September  to  31  October  1988). 


If  this  minimal  concentration  of  BaP  serves  as  an  indicator 
representing  a  whole  series  of  carcinogenic  PAH"s,  then  the 
equatorial  zone  in  question  can  be  readily  classified  as  one  of 
the  "background"  portions  of  the  World  Ocean. 

The  studies  at  Caroline  Atoll  (10°N,  150°W)  indicated 
that  BaP  was  present  in  individual  water  samples  both  from  the 
interior  portion  of  the  lagoon  and  from  the  inshore  waters  at 


Stations 
120    119  118  117  116  115 


Depth,  m 


i  i        i 


J L 


0.5 

10 


45 
100 


500 


Kldil 


15(H) 


2000 


BP  concentration,  ng/1 


□    -n-' 


□ 


->1  -2 


□    ->2-4 


->4-6 


->6-8 


Fig. 2.     Occurrence  of  benzol  a  Ipyrene  in  the  waters  of  the  Line/Phoenix 
transect  between  7°S  and  0°S  in  the  equatorial  Pacific  ( October  1 988 1. 


TABLE  1 

Benzol  a  )pyrene  concentrations  (ng/1)  in  the  waters  of  the  central  Pacific  (September  and  October  1988). 

Region         Station  No. 

0.5 

Depth,  m 

10             25             45              100 

500           1.000        1.500        2.000 

Caroline  Atoll 
Lagoon                                  0.0 

0.1                                               0.1 

0.1 

Inshore  waters         1  14             0.2 

0.1             0.1              0.0             0.1 

Line/Phoenix 

115 

0.4 

1.0 

3.7 

2.5 

4.7 

4.1 

4.4 

4.7 

- 

transect 

116 

2.5 

1.4 

0.6 

1.3 

1.5 

4.1 

6.5 

0.9 

0.9 

117 

0.1 

0.3 

0.3 

0.7 

0.2 

0.6 

1.1 

1.2 

0.9 

118 

10.3 

0.0 

1.1 

2.1 

5.8 

0.6 

1.6 

5.9 

— 

119 

2.4 

3.7 

2.2 

1.4 

7.2 

1.9 

11.3 

6.5 

0.5 

120 

2.0 

0.6 

0.0 

0.3 

1.0 

2.9 

2.7 

2.8 

0.6 

Marianas 

121 

80.0 

7.0 

5.9 

9.2 

3.6 

5.5 

5.3 

2.5 

2.7 

transect 

122 

104.0 

96.0 

94.0 

101.0 

86.0 

6.6 

9.7 

111.0 

96.0 

123 

57.5 

84.0 

94.0 

62.0 

84.0 

56.0 

39.3 

6.7 

5.0 

124 

38.2 

96.6 

68.4 

5.0 

14.0 

12.5 

6.6 

14.5 

0.8 

125 

2.7 

I.I 

3.5 

11.3 

1.6 

2.3 

2.1 

0.9 

10.8 

126 

12.2 

12.1 

2.3 

1.9 

3.0 

9.0 

14.3 

1.0 

6.2 

South  China 

127 

2.0 

3.2 

0.9 

16.0 

173.0* 

Sea 

127 

1.1 

2.3 

0.9 

0.6 

105.4* 

129 

18.5 

8.2 

3.2 

12.4 

9.3 

27.5** 

131 

64.  X 

17.1 

1  1.0 

6.0 

10.0 

148.8*** 

Sea-bottom  depths: 


*  -  6 1  m 

**  -  200  m 

***  -  250  m 


INS 


depths  of  up  to  100  in.  However,  these  also  corresponded  to 
background  values  not  exceeding  0.2  ng/1  and  averaging 
0.08  ng/l  (Table  1 ).  Particularly  noteworthy  was  the  absence 
of  BaP  in  the  top  0.5  m  of  the  water  column  inside  the  lagoon. 

Without  excluding  the  possibility  of  PAH  biosynthesis  in 
the  highly  productive  coral  ecosystem  of  Caroline  Atoll  (such 
as  the  phenomenon  reported  for  the  Clipperton  Lagoons; 
Niassat  el  <//. .  1 968 ).  it  may  be  assumed,  with  some  confidence, 
that  the  high  rates  of  photochemical  oxidation  and  microbial 
transformation  of  PAH's  characteristic  of  equatorial  waters  are 
conducive  to  the  elimination  of  PAH's  from  the  waters  of 
Caroline  Atoll  and  especially  from  the  surface  layer. 

Quite  the  opposite  situation  was  observed  in  the  Marianas 
trough  region  along  the  Marianas  transect  (between  142°E  and 
128  K.  along  1 1°N)  (Fig.  3).  Whereas  the  BaP  levels  at  the 
extremities  of  this  sector,  with  one  exception,  ranged  from 
0.9  to  9.2  ng/l  (Table  I ).  the  water  column  in  the  central  portion 
of  the  transect  (Stations  122  and  123)  contained  elevated  and 
even  maximum  concentrations  (up  to  and  over  100  ng/l).  As  is 
evident  from  Fig.  3.  high  BaP  levels  from  38  to  104  ng/l  were 
noted  not  only  in  the  surface  layer  but  also  in  deeper  waters. 
Thus,  the  BaP  concentration  in  the  upper  100-m  water  layer  at 
Station  122  averaged  96.2  ng/l.  while  the  average  value  at 
1 ,500-2.000  m  was  103.5  ng/l.  The  lowest  BaP  concentrations 
occurred  at  the  western  end  of  the  transect,  where  the  BaP 


HI', nii.i -  i 


Fig. 3.  Distribution  of  benzo(a)pyrene  in  the  waters  of  the  Marianas  transect 
along  1 1°N  (between  142°Eand  1 38°E)  in  the  tropical  Pacific  in  1981 
and  1988. 


levels  at  Stations  1 26  and  1 25  in  waters  up  to  2,000  m  deep  were 
4.03  and  6.88  ng/l.  respectively.  The  average  value  for  eastern 
Station  121,  at  depths  from  10  to  2.000  m.  was  5.17  ng/l. 

Analysis  of  rainwater  samples  taken  at  1 1°N  along  the 
transect  had  BaP  levels  of  7.2,  8.8,  and  9.2  ng/l;  that  was  one 
order  of  magnitude  lower  than  the  levels  in  rainwater  measured 
along  the  transect  in  1981  (Izrael&Tsyban,  1989).  Nevertheless, 
these  findings  point  to  the  possible  contribution  of  PAH's  to 
the  Marianas  sector  of  the  Pacific  via  long-distance  atmospheric 
transport  of  organic  pollutants. 

High  BaP  levels  (up  to  over  100  ng/l)  were  noted  in  the 
waters  of  the  Marianas  sector  during  the  previous  study  period 
in  1981  (Izrael  &  Tsyban,  1989).  These  ranged  from  80  to 
1 20  ng/l.  However,  the  pollution  in  all  instances  was  confined 
to  the  top  2  m  of  the  water  column  with  peaks  in  the  surface 
microlayer  (SML). 

Since  most  of  the  waters  of  the  Marianas  sector  lie  in  the 
area  of  influence  of  the  northern  branch  of  the  tradewind 
current,  it  may  be  supposed  that  the  invasion  of  deeper  layers 
by  pollutants  (including  BaP)  occurs  through  downwelling  of 
surface  water  due  to  the  anticyclonic  circulation  of  water 
masses  in  this  region. 

The  BaP  levels  in  the  southwestern  South  China  Sea  had 
a  broad  range  of  values  from  0.9  to  173  ng/l  (Table  1 ).  The 
lowest  BaP  levels  occurred  in  open  waters  at  Station  127 
(Fig.  1).  Two  days  of  work  at  this  station  yielded  similar 
estimates,  the  BaP  levels  over  most  of  the  water  column 
varying  from  0.6  to  2.0  ng/l  and  averaging  1 .5  ng/l.  The  bottom 
layer  (at  a  depth  of  61  m)  exhibited  a  very  high  BaP  concentration 
and  with  an  average  value  of  1 39.2  ng/l.  indicating  severe  PAH 
pollution. 

The  BaP  concentrations  in  the  waters  of  stations  lying 
close  to  the  eastern  coast  of  Singapore  (Stations  1 29  and  131) 
hadelevated  BaP  concentrations  in  the  lOto  100-m  layerof  the 
water  column  (averaging  8.2  and  13.2  ng/l,  respectively).  The 
maximum  BaP  lev  els  were  detected  in  the  top  0.5  m  layeron  the 
one  hand  and  at  the  sea  bottom  on  the  other.  These  were  as  high 
as  148. 8  ng/l  (Table  1). 

This  peculiar  pattern  of  BaP  level  distribution  over  the 
water  column  can  be  attributed  to  the  influx  of  PAH's  with  the 
oil  pollution  that  impacts  the  surface  waters  at  the  stations  in 
question  as  well  as  the  deeper  waters  below.  It  should  be  noted 
that  the  areas  of  the  South  China  Sea  investigated  are  busy 
maritime  thoroughfares  for  vessels  carrying  both  crude  oil  and 
refinery  products  as  well  as  sites  of  intense  offshore  drilling 
activity. 

The  potential  physiological  ability  of  microflora  to 
transform  BaP  in  the  central  Pacific  was  studied  in  a  series  of 
in  situ  experiments  using  natural  bacterioplankton  communities 
from  Caroline  Atoll  and  the  southwestern  portion  of  the  South 
China  Sea. 

The  results  of  the  process  simulations  expressed  in  terms 
of  the  degree  of  elimination  of  the  artificially-introduced 
amount  of  BaP  are  shown  in  Fig.  4.  The  bacterioplankton  of  the 
marine  areas  investigated  were  able  to  transform  the 
polyaromatic  hydrocarbon  in  question.  On  the  whole,  the  level 
of  microbial  degradation  reached  57-98%  of  the  mass  of  BaP 
introduced  into  the  samples  (Table  2).  In  order  to  gain  deeper 


189 


1(H) 
BaP  tranformation 
as  percentage  of 
initial  mass  (%).     80 


ontrol 


Days 


Fig.4. 


Dynamics  of  BaP  transformation  in  the  in  situ  experiments  using 
microflore  from  waters  of  Caroline  Atoll  lagoon  (a)  and  from  the 
South  China  Sea  (b)  at  Station  127  (1988  data).  (Initial  BaP 
concentration:  A-  2  |ig/l;  O-  10  ug/l;#-  control) 

insight  into  the  natural  processes  of  BaP  elimination  from  the 
marine  environment,  we  also  undertook  a  study  of  the  dynamics 
involved  in  microbial  transformation.  The  results  obtained 
from  individual  runs  of  each  experiment  yielded  reasonably 
consistent  values. 

As  may  be  seen  from  Fig.  4,  the  highest  microbial 
transformation  rates  were  noted  in  experiments  using  microflora 
taken  from  Caroline  Atoll  lagoon  water.  The  series  of  samples 
placed  in  natural  conditions  at  a  depth  of  8  m  contained  just 
50%  of  the  initially  introduced  amount  of  BaP  (initial 
concentration  10  ug/1)  after  only  2  days;  after  5  days  had 
elapsed,  97%  of  the  initial  BaP  had  been  transformed.  The  rate 
of  microbial  transformation  of  BaP  in  the  lagoon  waters  was 
high,  with  the  curve  of  the  degradation  process  close  to  linear. 


The  rate  of  microbial  transformation  of  BaP  in  the  South 
China  Sea  was  much  lower  than  for  the  atoll.  With  an  initial 
BaP  concentration  of  2  ng/1,  only  one-third  of  its  initial  mass 
had  been  transformed  after  5  days.  However,  after  7  days  of  the 
experiment,  the  microflora  from  the  top  0.5  m  of  the  water 
column  was  able  to  transform  as  much  as  77%  of  the  introduced 
BaP.  With  a  higher  concentration  (10  ug/1).  microbial 
transformation  in  the  experiment  produced  a  consistent  value, 
34%  of  the  initial  mass  over  the  third  through  the  fifth  days  of 
the  experiment  where  a  period  of  decreased  microfloral  activity 
occurred  (Fig.  4),  the  incremental  transformation  amounting  to 
just  0.6  ug  of  BaP.  In  these  tests,  the  total  mass  of  the  BaP 
degraded  after  7  days;  at  the  time  which  the  experiment  was 
terminated,  the  mass  did  not  exceed  5.68  ug  (56%  of  the  initial 
concentration).  On  the  whole,  the  rate  of  microbial 
transformation  of  BaP  turned  out  to  be  not  particularly  dependent 
on  the  initial  concentration  (2  and  10  Ug/1).  Assuming  the 
process  curve  to  be  more  or  less  linear  for  both  the  equatorial 
and  the  tropical  Pacific,  we  were  able  to  estimate  the  average 
rates  of  microbial  transformation  of  BaP.  The  resulting  values 
were  1.94  ug/l/day  for  the  waters  of  Caroline  Atoll  and 
0.81  ug/l/day  for  the  South  China  Sea. 

The  abilities  of  marine  microflora  to  degrade  BaP  are 
therefore  relatively  high.  In  the  case  of  the  Caroline  Atoll,  the 
biodegradation  rates  exceeded  those  of  similar  processes 
investigated  in  impacted  areas  such  as  the  Baltic  Sea  (Tsyban 
ctal.,  1985a).  The  results  of  our  1988  studies  demonstrate  the 
need  to  consider  PAH,  and  especially  BaP.  metabolism  as  an 
exceedingly  important  process  for  detoxification  through  the 
elimination  of  the  pollutants  in  question  from  the  highly 
dynamic  ecosystem  that  constitutes  the  tropical  zones  of  the 
World  Ocean. 


TABLE  2 

Dynamics  of  benzo(a)pyrene  transformation  by  microflora  from  central  Pacific  waters  in  the  in  situ 

experiments  (October  1988). 


Region  of 

Operations  and 

sampling  depth. 

m 


BaP  concentration,  ug/1 

Exposure,             Initial           At  end  of  experiment 
days Cj Control Exp. 


Microbial 
transformation  of 

BaP,  in  %  of 
concentration  C, 


Caroline  Atoll 
Lagoon,  S  m 


South  China  Sea. 
Station  127,0.5  m 


Same  as  above 


0 

id 

1 

10 

2 

10 

3 

10 

4 

10 

5 

10 

5 

10 

() 

2.0 

3 

2 

5 

2 

7 

2 

7 

2 

0 

10 

3 

10 

5 

10 

7 

10 

7 

10 

9.9 


9.9 


2.0 


2.0 


10 


9.9 


7.8 
4.9 
3.? 
1.8 
0.3 


0 

1.71 
1.37 
0.46 


6.62 
6.00 

4.32 


0 
22 
51 
65 
82 
97 
0 


14.5 

3 1 .5 

77.0 

0 

0 
33.8 

40.0 

56.8 

0 


190 


2.4     Cesium- 137  in  the  Surface  Waters  of  the 
Central  Equatorial  Pacific 


VLADIMIR  I.  MEDINETS5 ,  VLADIMIR  G.  SOLOVEV ,  and  BORIS  V.  GLEBOV* 

'State  Oceanographic  Institute,  Odessa  Branch,  USSR 

*  Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology,  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  and  Academy  of  Sciences,  Moscow,  USSR 


Introduction 

The  study  of  radioactive  contamination  of  ocean  waters 
throughout  the  world  is  one  of  the  most  important  tasks  facing 
researchers  concerned  with  the  effects  of  human  activities  on 
the  ocean  environment.  Man-induced  radioactivity  of  the 
marine  environment  has  three  origins:  7.  nuclear  weapons 
testing;  2.  nuclear  power  plant  operation;  and  3.  operation  of 
nuclear  fuel  treatment  and  reprocessing  plants. 

The  need  for  more  information  about  the  present  status  of 
radioactive  contaminants  of  World  Ocean  waters  prompted 
our  research  efforts  in  the  course  of  the  47th  cruise  of  the  R/V 
Akademik  Korolev  in  the  central  portion  of  the  central  equatorial 
and  western  Pacific  from  September  to  November  1988. 

The  indicator  of  radioactive  pollution  selected  was  cesium- 
1 37,  a  radionuclide  with  a  long  half-life.  It  is  this  radionuclide, 
together  with  strontium-90  and  plutonium-239,  that  presents 
the  greatest  potential  threat  to  the  marine  environment. 

Methods 

Seawater  samples  of  large  volume  (0.8-1.1  m1)  were 
drawn  from  various  depths  (0-200  m)  using  NIVA  and  Malysh 
immersion  pumps.  Selective  extraction  of  the  cesium- 1 37  was 
performed  with  the  aid  of  Milton-T  fibrous  sorbent  impregnated 
with  copper  ferrocyanide  (Vakulovsky,  1986).  Following 
extraction,  the  sorbent  was  reduced  to  ash  in  a  flameless  muffle 
furnace  at  a  temperature  not  exceeding  450°C.  The  ash  residue 
was  then  hermetically  sealed  in  a  polyethylene  capsule.  In 
December  1988.  the  samples  were  measured  using  a  gamma- 
spectrometry  setup  at  one  of  the  laboratories  of  the  State 
Oceanographic  Institute,  Odessa  Branch.  The  error  of  the 
cesium- 137  determinations  did  not  exceed  10%.  The  detection 
threshold  was  0.01  Bq. 

Results 

Cesium- 137  levels  in  surface  waters  were  determined  in 
the  central  equatorial  portion  of  the  Pacific,  as  well  as  in  the 
Philippine,  South  China,  East  China,  and  Japan  Seas.  The 
results  are  summarized  in  Table  1.  Figure  1  shows  the  location 
of  cesium-137  level  measurements  in  the  surface  (0-3  m)  layer 
of  Pacific  Basin  waters  along  the  expedition  route. 


Analysis  of  the  data  showed  that  the  spatial  distribution 
of  cesium-137  levels  was  very  uneven.  The  absolute 
minimum  and  maximum  concentrations  were  recorded  in  the 
equatorial  Pacific.  The  minimum  level  recorded  in  the  course 
of  the  entire  expedition  was  situated  at  8°N,  1 56°35'W  between 
Hawaii  and  Christmas  Island.  This  was  at  a  time  when  the 
Akademik  Korolev  was  traversing  the  northern  boundary 
of  the  intratropical  convergence  zone.  Precipitation  was 
abundant,  and  the  resulting  dilution  was  what,  in  our  view, 
lowered  the  cesium- 1 37  concentration  in  the  top  layer  down  to 
0.7  Bq/m\ 

A  maximum  concentration  of  7.0  Bq/m3  was  recorded  in 
the  vicinity  of  Kusaie  Island  in  the  Carolines  group. 

During  this  period,  the  vessel  was  at  its  shortest  distance 
from  the  Marshall  Islands  that  include  the  Bikini  and  Eniwetok 
Atolls,  sites  where  nuclear  weapons  were  tested  in  the  1950's. 
The  elevated  levels  observed  were  attributable  either  to  the 
transport  of  the  cesium-137  enriched  water  masses  from  the 
Marshall  Islands  or  to  the  presence  of  the  local  sources  on  the 
Kusaie  Island,  lying  eight  miles  north  of  the  cruise  track.  A 
more  detailed  survey  of  the  region  might  allow  identification  of 
sources. 

Elevated  (3.4-3.9  Bq/m1)  cesium-137  levels  in  the  waters 
off  Tarawa  and  Caroline  Atolls  and  Christmas  Island  may  have 
been  due  to  the  transport  of  oceanic  waters  from  the  Tuamotu 
Archipelago,  where  nuclear  weapon  testing  is  regularly 
conducted  by  France.  The  considerable  difference  between  the 
cesium-137  levels  in  samples  taken  two  miles  off  Caroline 
Atoll  and  those  measured  in  the  waters  of  its  lagoon  was 
especially  noteworthy. 

The  cesium-137  level  in  the  lagoon  water  was  double  the 
value  obtained  for  oceanic  water  taken  off  the  atoll.  This  may 
be  attributed  to  cesium-137  enrichment  of  the  inner  lagoon 
waters  by  the  flushing  of  radionuclides  deposited  on  the  atoll 
surface  by  atmospheric  fallout.  Analysis  of  the  average  levels 
of  cesium-137  for  each  region  (Table  2)  showed  that  the 
'cleanest'  waters  of  all  the  ocean  areas  studied  were  those  of  the 
equatorial  Pacific.  In  terms  of  radioactive  pollution,  this  region 
must  be  ranked  between  the  Bering  Sea  (Medinets  et  al. .  1 992) 
and  the  rest  of  the  regions  of  the  Pacific. 

The  findings  of  the  present  study  agree  with  the  results 
obtained  by  Japanese  researchers  who  worked  in  the  central 
Pacific  in  1980-82  (Nagaya  &  Nakamura,  1985). 


191 


TABLE  1 


Cesium- 137  levels  in  Pacific  Ocean  waters  in  the  autumn  of  1988. 


TABLE  2 

Mean  cesium- 137  levels  in  seawater  bv  region. 


Date 

Cooi 

dinates 

Sampling 

Mean  levels 

Latitude 

Longitude 

depth  ( m ) 

Bq/m3 

09-15 

8°00'  N 

156°35'  W 

0-3 

0.7 

09-16 

4°40'  N 

157°04'W 

0-3 

2.7 

09-18 

1°28'N 

157°43' W 

0-3 

2.6 

09-19 

1°I6'N 

I56°00'W 

0-3 

3.5 

09-20 

5°49'  S 

153°05'W 

0-60 

3.6 

09-2 1 

6°53'  S 

I53°21'W 

0  -  7(1 

2.9 

09-25 

9°59'  S 

!50°15'W 

(1-  100 

1.9 

09-28* 

9°59'  S 

15015'  W 

0-3 

3.9 

10-02 

6°37'  S 

!61a44'W 

0-  100 

3.6 

10-04 

3°48'  S 

1 72°03'  W 

0-  100 

-i  2 

10-07 

0°16' S 

177°38'  1 

0-  20 

2.0 

10-08 

l°20'N 

172  20'  E 

0-  100 

1.9 

10-11 

2°41'N 

168C17'E 

0-  3 

3.3 

10-11 

3°03'  N 

I61°01'E 

0-3 

2.3 

10-12 

4  20'N 

162°27'E 

0-  3 

7.0 

10-13 

7°21'N 

156°42'  E 

0-3 

4.4 

10-14 

10  08' N 

153=45' E 

0-3 

5.9 

10-15 

1016' N 

147°45'E 

0-3 

3.4 

10-16 

i  r  12'  n 

I42°55'E 

0-3 

2.9 

10-17 

11    1 5'  N 

1 39°35'  E 

0-3 

3.0 

10-18 

noo'N 

1 36°00'  E 

0-  120 

4.4 

10-18 

1 1  °05'  N 

134°07'E 

0-3 

4.9 

10-19 

1  10()()'  N 

I32°21'E 

0  -  3 

3.7 

10-20 

1 1  °00'  N 

130  33' E 

0-3 

3.3 

10-21 

ID  59' N 

128°46'E 

0  -  200 

5.5 

10-24 

5°I2'N 

I14°05'E 

0-3 

6.2 

10-25 

5  50' N 

I09°27'E 

0-3 

5.3 

10-27 

6°00'  N 

I06°54'  E 

0  -  50 

5.2 

10-27 

6°00'  N 

106°54'E 

0  -  50 

5.2 

10-28 

5°14'N 

106°27'  E 

0  -  55 

4.2 

10-28 

5°14'N 

106°27'  E 

0  -  60 

4.5 

10-29 

4°18'N 

)05°54' E 

0-80 

4.8 

10-29 

3  23'  N 

105°19'E 

0  -  60 

4.3 

10  30 

:  1 9'  n 

1 1 14  54'  E 

0-4(1 

3.4 

11-06 

4  20'  N 

I06°42'E 

(1-  70 

5.9 

11-07 

4  4I'N 

II  47' E 

0  -  70 

5.2 

1 1-08 

8°04'  N 

I16°13'E 

0-  3 

4.9 

1 1-09 

ll°35'N 

1 1 8°42'  E 

0-3 

6.3 

1 1-10 

I7°26'N 

114  53' E 

0-  120 

4.9 

nil 

21    I6'N 

121°43'E 

0  -  10 

4.8 

11-12 

24  58'  N 

12  V  39'  E 

0-  10 

4.3 

11-13 

2')  00'  N 

1 27°00'  E 

0  -  m 

4.3 

11-13 

S2   17' N 

I28°09'E 

0-  10 

4.4 

11-14 

36  41'  N 

130°52'E 

0  ■  lu 

5.3 

11-15 

41    M'N 

I32°12'E 

0-  10 

4.7 

II   15 

43  Ol'N 

131°59'E 

0-  Hi 

5.6 

Sample 

draw n  Iron 

the  lagoon  ( 

1  Caroline  Ah 

II. 

Region 


Mean  level 
Bq/m 


Bering  Seal  50-60°  N) 
(from  Medinets  <■/  <//..  1992 ) 

Pacific  Ocean  (10-40   N) 
(from  Nagaya&  Nakamura,  le)S5i 

Equatorial  Pacific  (5  N- 1 0°S) 

South  China  Sea 

East  China  Sea 

Sea  of  Japan 


2.4  ±0.2 

5.2  ±  0.3 

3.610.3 
5.0  ±0.2 

4  3  ±  0. 1 
5.2  ±  0.3 


Fig.  1.  Map  of  sampling  locations  to  determine  cesium- 137  levels  (Bq/m1)  in 
the  surface  layer  (0-3  m).  (^denotes  results  obtained  in  the  present 
study;  0  denotes  results  reported  by  Nagaya  &  Nakamura.  1985) 


Comparison  of  the  overall  radiation  picture  in  the  Pacific 
region  with  our  findings  on  the  contamination  status  of  the 
Black  and  Baltic  Seas  conducted  from  1 986  to  1  OSS  show  s  that 
cesium- 137  concentrations  in  the  Pacific  arc.  at  present.  10  to 
20  times  lower  than  in  the  seas  of  the  European  region  impacted 
bv  local  resources. 


192 


2.5     Quantity  and  Distribution  of  Plastics: 
An  Analysis  of  Chemical  Hazards  to 
Marine  Life 

GREGORY  J.  SMITH'  and  CHARLES  J.  STAFFORD; 

"Wildlife  International  Ltd.,  Easton,  Maryland,  USA 

fUS  Environmental  Protection  Agency,  Analytical  Chemistry  Laboratoiy,  Beltsville,  Mankind.  USA 


Introduction 

In  recent  years,  plastics  in  the  marine  environment  have 
been  recognized  as  important  pollutants  of  marine  ecosystems 
(Laist,  1987;  Prater,  1987;  Wolfe,  1987).  Medical  waste, 
plastic  debris,  and  other  types  of  refuse  have  washed  ashore  on 
Atlantic  Coast  beaches  at  alarming  rates.  These  events  have 
created  new  public  awareness  of  the  critical  nature  of  the 
plastic  waste  disposal.  Plastics  present  a  unique  disposal 
problem  because  the  same  attributes  that  make  many  types  of 
plastics  useful  also  enhance  their  longevity  and  buoyancy  in 
the  world's  oceans. 

The  distribution  of  plastics  has  been  studied  in  various 
estuarine.  coastal,  and  oceanic  waters  of  the  world. 
Concentrations  of  plastics  in  surface  waters  have  been  associated 
with  oceanic  convergence  zones  or  the  proximity  to  shipping 
lanes  (Colton  et  ai.  1974;  Wong  et  ai.  1974;  Wolfe,  1987). 
Although  the  distribution  and  abundance  of  plastics  in  the 
oceans  have  been  studied  almost  exclusively  in  surface  water, 
it  is  well  known  that  many  types  of  plastics  do  not  float  and 
must  occur  in  marine  sediments  (Shaw,  1977).  Gradual  sinking 
of  those  plastics  that  do  float  is  also  possible  as  bacteria, 
diatoms,  hydroids.  and  other  marine  life  grow  on  the  surface  of 
floating  plastics  (Carpenter  et  al.,  1972;  Colton  et  ai.  1974; 
Winston,  1982).  Morris  (1980)  indicated  that  floating  plastics 
gradually  sink  to  the  bottom  or  to  a  denser  horizon  where  they 
attain  neutral  buoyancy  and  remain  in  suspension.  Because  the 
stratum  of  the  pycnocline  represents  a  marked  change  in  water 
density,  this  would  appear  to  be  a  likely  area  for  subsurface 
accumulation  of  plastics  with  the  appropriate  neutral  buoyancy. 

Potential  adverse  effects  of  plastics  in  the  marine 
environment  include  aesthetic,  physical,  and  chemical.  Clearly, 
floating  plastic  debris  or  litter  that  occurs  on  beaches  is  visually 
unpleasant.  Physical  impacts  of  plastics  have  been  well 
documented.  Entanglement  and  ingestion  of  floating  plastics 
by  sea  turtles  have  been  found  in  several  areas  (Balazs,  1985; 
Carr,  1987).  Fish  have  been  found  to  ingest  plastic  pellets 
(Carpenter  et  ai.  1972),  as  have  seabirds  (Connors  &  Smith, 
1982;Furness,  1985;  Day  &  Shaw,  1987;  Fry  etai.  1987).  In 
several  studies  seabirds  were  found  to  have  consumed  massive 
quantities  of  plastics  (Day  et  al..  1985:  Furness.  1985;  Fry 
etai,  1987;  Ryan.  1987).  The  physical  ingestion  of  plastics  has 
been  detrimental  with  respect  to  causing  digestive  system 
impaction,   ulcerative   lesions,   and  reducing  meal  size 


(Day  etai.  1985;  Fry  etai.  1987;  Ryan,  1988a).  However, 
there  continues  to  be  much  speculation  regarding  the  potential 
chemical  hazards  of  plastics  to  seabirds  and  other  marine 
organisms. 

Raw  plastic  pellets  have  generally  been  considered  to  be 
biologically  inactive,  although  manufactured  plastics  often 
contain  additives  known  to  be  toxic  (van  Franeker,  1985). 
Moreover,  since  Carpenter  et  al.  (1972)  published  the  first 
account  of  polychlorinated  biphenyls  (PCB's)  adsorbing  to 
plastic  spherules  in  seawater.  there  has  been  concern  for  the 
potential  for  PCB  exposure  to  fish  and  wildlife  that  ingest 
plastics.  Ryan  et  al.  ( 1988b)  found  evidence  to  suggest  that 
seabirds  assimilated  PCB's  from  ingested  plastic  particles. 
However,  Fry  etai  ( 1 987 )  suggested  that  plastics  were  unlikely 
to  pose  a  significant  toxic  hazard  to  birds  compared  to  the 
physical  impaction  effects  that  may  result.  Polychlorinated 
biphenyls  are  commonly  found  in  certain  types  of  plastics  and 
the  potential  for  plastics  to  adsorb  PCB's  from  ambient  water 
would  suggest  two  possible  sources  of  PCB  contamination 
from  marine  plastics.  One  potential  source  would  be  intrinsic: 
PCB's  incorporated  into  the  plastic  during  manufacturing.  A 
second  source,  extrinsic,  represents  PCB' s  adsorbed  or  absorbed 
from  contaminated  water.  To  date,  there  is  still  little  known 
about  the  association  of  environmental  contaminants  occurring 
both  in  and  on  plastics  in  the  marine  environment  and  their 
potential  toxic  hazard  to  marine  organisms. 

In  this  paper  we  report  the  abundance  and  distribution  of 
plastics  in  areas  of  the  central  Pacific  Ocean  and  the  South 
China  Sea.  Both  surface  water  and  water  at  the  level  of  the 
pycnocline  were  sampled.  Chemical  extractions  of  the  plastics 
recovered  were  analyzed  for  several  organic  pollutants  and 
subsequent  field  and  laboratory  experiments  were  conducted 
to  elucidate  potential  toxic  hazards  that  plastics  may  pose  to 
fish,  seabirds,  and  other  marine  organisms. 

Methods 

Field  Sampling 

Sampling  was  conducted  during  the  Third  Joint 
US-USSR  Bering  &  Chukchi  Seas  Expedition  to  the  two  seas 
and  the  central  Pacific  Ocean,  along  the  segment  from  Hawaii 
to  Singapore.  Trawls  for  plastics  were  made  from  15  September 
to  30  October  1988,  along  the  18,400-km  cruise  track  of  the 
Soviet  R/V  Akademik  Korolev.  During  the  cruise,  the  vessel 


193 


spent  8  days  at  Caroline  Atoll,  Kiribati,  a  remote  coral  atoll  at 
9°59.09"S,  150°  14.04" W.  Neuston  sampling  of  the  lagoon 
water  of  Caroline  Atoll  was  done  using  a  stationary  102  u. 
(0.5  x  1  ml  neuston  net  placed  in  the  tidal  currents  of  the 
entrance  to  the  lagoon.  The  stationary  net  was  left  in  position, 
with  the  opening  facing  toward  the  lagoon,  over  a  7-day  period, 
during  both  flood  and  ebb  tides.  Also,  one  additional  location 
in  the  central  lagoon  was  sampled  during  two  30-min  tows 
using  two  neuston  nets  ( 102  |i)  towed  alongside  an  inflatable 
boat. 

Three  different  types  of  sampling  methods  were  used  in 
the  open  ocean.  These  included  /.  surface  sampling  using  a 
1  x  2-m  tucker  trawl  (in  the  open  position)  equipped  with  a 
94  u.  net;  2.  surface  sampling  with  a  102  U.  neuston  net  with  a 
0.5  x  1-  m  opening;  and  3.  subsurface  water  sampling  at  the 
pycnocline  horizon  by  deploying  and  hauling  the  tucker  trawl 
in  the  closed  position  and  fishing  at  depth  in  the  open  position. 
The  pycnocline  was  determined  using  Soviet  equipment 
installed  aboard  the  research  vessel  to  determine  temperature, 
salinity,  and  density.  Each  net  apparatus  was  equipped  with  a 
flow  meter  to  determine  the  linear  distance  sampled  that  was 
later  expressed  on  a  surface  area  basis  for  surface  sampling  and 
a  volume  basis  for  sampling  at  depth. 

Surface  water  trawls  from  the  ship  averages  15  min  with 
half  of  the  rectangular  opening  of  each  net  below  the  surface. 
The  tucker  trawl  was  towed  off  the  bow  of  the  ship  at  speeds 
between  82.0  and  280.6  cm/s.  Neuston  trawls  were  done  from 
the  stern  of  the  ship  while  drifting  at  speeds  from 
5.4  to  55.0  cm/s.  At  the  end  of  each  tow  the  sample  was 
removed  and  passed  through  a  series  of  acetone/hexane  rinsed 
stainless  steel  sieves  with  pore  sizes  of  4  mm,  1  mm,  500  |i,  and 
106  u  to  fractionate  the  sample.  Each  fraction  was  examined 
under  magnification  for  the  presence  of  plastics;  marine 
organisms  were  separated  from  the  sample  for  storage.  Plastics 
recovered  from  the  sample  were  immediately  characterized  as 
to  size,  type  (raw  pellet,  fragments  of  plastic  objects,  fishing 
gear),  and  frozen  in  chemically-clean  glass  jars. 

Chemical  Analysis 

All  plastics  (fragments  and  pellets)  were  removed  from 
I  lie  fractionated  sample,  weighed,  and  extracted  by  shaking  the 
sample  three  times  in  separate  5-ml  rinses  of  hexane.  Hexane 
extraction  was  used  to  remove  nonpolar  organics  from  the 
surface  of  the  plastics  and  to  avoid  chemically  dissolving  the 
plastic  samples.  The  extracts  were  combined  and  concentrated 
to  a  volume  of  I  ml  using  a  stream  of  dry  nitrogen.  Sample 
extracts  were  analyzed  for  chlorinated  hydrocarbons  using  a 
Hewlett-Packard  (HP)589()A  gas  chromatograph  equipped 
with  a  "'Ni  electron  capture  detector  and  a  30m  DB1  column. 
An  IIP  5890A  interfaced  with  an  HP  5970  mass  selective 
detector,  in  the  full  scanning  mode  from  50  to  450  atomic  mass 
units,  was  used  to  detect  the  presence  of  other  halogenated 
hydrocarbons  and  petroleum  hydrocarbons. 

Plastic  Adsorption  and  Chemical  Release  Experiment 

1  o  assess  the  possible  chemical  hazards  of  plastic  to 
marine  life  two  experiments  were  conducted.  Theseexperiments 
were  designed  to  evaluate  the  potential  adsorption  of  organic 


compounds  from  surface  water  and  to  determine  if  the 
gastrointestinal  environment  of  birds  could  cause  the  release  of 
organic  compounds  from  raw  polyethylene  pellets. 

To  determine  the  adsorption  potential  of  plastics 
from  surface  water,  100  g  of  new  polyethylene  pellets 
were  placed  in  a  1-m-diameter  brass-wire  mesh  enclosure  in 
Baltimore  Harbor.  Chesapeake  Bay.  After  24  h.  the  pellets 
were  collected,  handled,  and  analyzed  according  to 
the  procedures  described  above.  At  the  same  time  the  plastics 
were  collected,  a  sample  of  the  surface  microlayer  was  collected 
by  contact  and  adhesion  of  surface  water  to  a  glass  plate. 
The  plate  was  dipped  repeatedly  and  rinsed  with  methylene 
chloride  to  obtain  a  sample  volume  of  approximately  1-1 
of  water  from  the  microlayer.  Water  microlayer  samples 
were  extracted  with  methylene  chloride  and  analyzed  using 
the  same  methods  as  the  plastic  extracts.  The  purpose  of 
the  microlayer  sample  was  to  facilitate  the  comparison 
between  compounds  found  in  the  surface  microlayer  and 
what  was  potentially  adsorbed  to  the  plastic  pellets. 
This  experiment  was  conducted  to  assess  the  possible 
adsorption  characteristics  of  plastics  under  environmental 
conditions. 

To  determine  if  chlorinated  or  petroleum  hydrocarbons 
could  potentially  be  released  from  polyethylene  pellets  in  the 
digestive  system  of  birds,  a  simulation  experiment  was 
conducted.  The  experiment  was  patterned  after  those  of 
Kimball  and  Munir  ( 1 97 1 )  using  a  42  C  HC1  bath  to  simulate 
the  physicochemical  conditions  in  the  digestive  system  of 
waterfowl.  Hydrochloric  acid  was  added  to  1  N  saline  solution 
to  yield  digestive  solutions  with  pH"s  of  1.4  and  2.8.  Two 
50-g  samples  of  polyethylene  pellets  were  added  to  glass  jars 
containing  either  a  1  N  saline  only  (controls).  pH  1.4  solutions, 
pH  2.8  solutions,  or  a  hexane  (without  saline).  These  solutions 
were  agitated  in  a  water  bath  at  42°C.  At  the  end  of  8  days,  the 
plastics  and  the  digestive  solutions  were  extracted  with 
methylene  chloride  and  these  extracts  were  analyzed  for 
chlorinated  and  petroleum  hydrocarbons  using  the  methods 
described  above. 

Results  and  Discussion 

Over  80,000  m:  of  surface  water  and  93.000  m3  of 
subsurface  water  were  sampled  during  the  course  of  the 
expedition  (Table  1 ).  The  total  number  of  stations  sampled 
using  either  the  947  \i  tucker  trawl,  the  102  |i  neuston  net.  or 
both  at  a  single  location  was  28  and  8  for  the  Pacific  Ocean  and 
South  China  Sea.  respectively.  Sampling  at  Caroline  Atoll  was 
done  at  only  two  locations.  Plastics  were  recovered  from  219i 
of  the  sample  collected  in  the  Pacific  Ocean;  five  of  six  positive 
samples  contained  opaque  polyethylene  pellets.  The  sixth 
sample  contained  plastic  fragments,  not  raw  pellets.  The 
concentration  of  plastics  at  positive  stations  varied  considerably. 
with  a  maximum  of  0. 1 8566  mg  plastic/m:  (Table  2 1.  Although 
sampling  was  done  along  the  cruise  track  from  as  far  north  as 
10°N  to  as  tar  south  as  10°S.  plastics  were  only  recovered  from 
stations  near  the  ION  latitude  area  (Fig.  I ).  Tar  balls  were 
found  at  only  two  of  the  stations  sampled  in  the  open  waters  of 
the  Pacific  (Table  I). 


194 


TABLE  1 


Sampling  information  and  recoveries  of  plastics  from  the  central  Pacific  Ocean  and  South  China  Sea.  Sampling 
was  done  from  15  September  through  30  October  1988. 


Volume(m') 

Total 

Number  of  Sampling  Stations 

with 

Geographic 

Sample 

Net 

or  Area  (m:) 

No. 

Plastic 

Plastic 

Tar 

Region 

Type 

Mesh(u) 

Sampled 

Stations 

Fragments 

Pellets 

Balls 

Pacific  Ocean 

Surface 

947 

39.214 

23 

5 

5 

2 

102 

3.627 

8 

1 

0 

2 

Pycnocline 

947 

5 1 ,657 

9 

0 

0 

0 

Caroline  Atoll 

Surface 

102 

21.571 

fixed 
station 

0 

0 

0 

Surface 

102 

2.508 

2  trawls 

0 

0 

0 

South  China  Sea 

Surface 

947 

15.213 

8 

7 

2 

2 

102 

394 

1 

1 

0 

0 

Pycnocline 

947 

42,107 

4 

1 

0 

0 

TABLE  2 

Occurrence  and  concentrations  of  plastics  from  the  central  Pacific 

Ocean  and  South  China  Sea.  Sampling  was  done  from 

15  September  through  30  October  1988. 

Plastic"  Concentrations  (mg/m:) 
Stations  Sampled  at  Positive  Stations 

Geographic         No.  of        No.  w/ 

Range  Locations11    Plastics     Mean  Range 


Pacific  Ocean         28  6 

South  China  Sea      8  7 


0.07340        0.01309-0.18566 
0.19478       0.00126-0.69632 


■^ 


>m.     M     ,!,:( 


Plastic  includes  pellets  and  fragments. 
'  Several  stations  were  represented  by  more  than  one  sample. 


In  the  South  China  Sea,  seven  of  the  eight  different 
locations  sampled  had  plastics  present  in  the  surface  water,  but 
only  two  of  the  seven  had  plastic  pellets  (Table  1 ).  Most  of 
the  plastics  found  in  this  area  consisted  of  synthetic  fishing 
line  and  secondary,  manufactured  plastics  in  the  process  of 
breaking  down.  Plastic  concentrations  in  the  South  China 
Sea  samples  were  considerably  greater  than  those  found  in 
the  Pacific  Ocean,  with  a  maximum  concentration  of 
0.69632  mg  plastic/m2  (Table  2).  Although  only  two  stations 
sampled  had  tar  balls  present,  one  of  these  samples  contained 
hundreds  of  tar  balls  and  164  of  these  were  greater  than  4  mm 
in  size. 

Sampling  of  the  lagoon  water  at  Caroline  Atoll  was  done 
at  two  locations,  one  in  the  central  lagoon  and  the  other  at  a 
fixed  station  at  the  entrance  channel  to  the  lagoon.  At  the  fixed 
station,  current  flowed  through  the  neuston  net  at  an  average 


Fig.  1 .  Locations  sampled  along  the  cruise  track  of  the  Akademik  Korolev, 
September-October  1988.  Sampling  locations  are  indicated  by  solid 
dots.  Plastic  densities  at  positive  stations  are  given  in  mg  per  meter 
square.  Major  currents  for  October  1988  are  shown  by  the  arrows. 

velocity  of  4.08  cm/s.  No  plastics  or  other  anthropogenic 
materials  were  recovered  from  any  of  the  samples  at  Caroline 
Atoll  (Table  1). 

The  concentrations  of  plastics  in  the  open  Pacific  Ocean 
stations  that  had  plastics  present  in  the  surface  water  were 
below  mean  concentrations  reported  for  the  subtropical  North 
Pacific  (Wong  el  al,  1974;  Shaw  &  Mapes,  1979)  and  higher 
than  from  other  studies  in  the  North  Pacific  (Day  &  Shaw, 
1987).  Results  from  this  study  indicate  that  a  much  greater 
concentration  of  raw  plastic  pellets  occur  in  the  central  Pacific 
compared  to  the  North  Pacific.  There  are  no  other  data  from  the 
central  Pacific  region  that  can  be  used  for  temporal  comparisons. 

The  greater  frequency  of  occurrence  of  raw  material 
plastic  pellets  compared  to  discarded  plastic  objects  and  tar 
balls  in  the  South  China  Sea  was  somewhat  surprising.  The 
occurrence  of  discarded  plastic  may  be  expected  from  the 


195 


heavy  shipping  traffic  in  this  region  of  the  world.  Moreover, 
there  is  extensive  offshore  oil  production  in  the  South  China 
Sea  and  a  high  occurrence  ot  tar  balls  would  also  be  expected. 
The  greater  frequency  of  occurrence  of  plastic  pellets  compared 
to  tar  balls  is  noteworthy.  The  longevity  of  plastics  in  the 
marine  environment  likely  contributes  to  the  increase  of  this 
material  in  the  oceans. 

The  distribution  of  plastics  in  the  Pacific  Ocean  was 
largely  a  function  of  the  major  currents.  All  stations  sampled 
that  contained  plastics  were  along  a  l()°N  latitude  convergence 
lying  between  the  North  Equatorial  Current  and  the  North 
Equatorial  Countercurrent  (Fig.  1 ).  The  most  likely  source  of 
the  plastics  recovered  at  this  convergence  would  either  be  from 
ships  or  as  industrial  waste  from  plastic-producing  Pacific  Rim 
countries. 

All  plastic  sample  extracts  were  analyzed  for  the  organic 
compounds  listed  in  Table  3.  None  of  the  samples  contained 
quantifiable  concentrations  of  organochlorine  pesticides,  PCB's, 
aliphatic  hydrocarbons,  or  polycyclic  aromatic  hydrocarbons 
included  in  the  analyses.  The  absence  of  detectable  levels  of 
these  contaminants  suggests  that  the  plastics  that  were  collected 
at  sea  did  not  adsorb  any  of  these  compounds,  either  because 
the  plastic  surface  did  not  facilitate  this  or  because  the 
contaminants  were  not  present  in  sufficient  concentrations. 

In  the  field  experiment  conducted  in  Chesapeake  Bay's 
Baltimore  Harbor,  plastic  polyethylene  pellets  left  floating  in 
the  water  for  24  h  were  extracted  and  analyzed  using  the  same 

TABLE  3 

Organic  compounds  included  in  the  analysis  of  extractions  of 
plastics 


Chlorinated 
Pesticides 
ami  PCB's 


Aliphatic 
Hydrocarbons 


Polycyclic 

Aromatic 
Hvdrocarbons 


Heptachlorepoxide 
Oxychlordane 
Trans  -  chlordane 
Cis  -  chlordane 
Trans  -  nonachlor 
Cis  -  nonachlor 
Dieldrin 
I  .mil  i ii 
p.p"  -  DDT 
p.p"  •  DDD 

p.p"     1)1)1 

PBC(1254) 


n  -  dodecane 
n  -  tridecane 
n  -  tetradecane 
n  -  pentadecane 
Nonycyclohexane 
n  -  hexadecane 
n  -  heptadecane 
n_-  octadecane 
n  -  nonadecane 
n  -  eicosane 

Tetrameth)  I- 
pentadecane 


Naphthalene 

Fluorene 

Phenanthrene 

Anthracene 

Fliioranthrene 

Pj  rene 

1.2. -ben/anthracene 

Chrysene 

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 

9,10- 

diphenylanthrocene 

Benzo(e)pyrene 

Benzo(a)pyrene 
1.2.5.6-  dibenz 
anthracene 
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 
Pen  lene 


The  lower  limit  of  quantification  was  0.05  ug/g  for  aliphatic 
hydrocarbons,  0.4  ug/g  lor  polycyclic  hydrocarbons,  mis  ug/g  for 
chlorinated  pesticides,  and  0.25  ug/g  foi  l'(  !B's  based  on  a  0.2  g 

sample. 


methods  as  those  collected  at  sea.  A  sample  of  the  microlayer 
was  taken  the  same  time  these  plastics  were  placed  in  the  water 
and  was  analyzed  for  the  same  contaminants  as  the  plastic 
extracts.  Two  aromatic  compounds,  pyrene  and  fluoranthene, 
were  detected  in  the  microlayer  sample:  however,  only 
fluoranthene  was  present  in  the  extract  of  the  polyethylene 
pellets. 

These  data  indicate  that  polyethylene  pellets  have  the 
potential  to  adsorb  at  least  one  organic  compound,  fluoranthene. 
from  ambient  seawater.  The  specific  mechanism  of  adsorption 
could  be  either  a  binding  of  the  organic  compound  to  the  plastic 
surface  directly  or  to  a  film  of  water  surrounding  the  plastic 
pellet.  It  is  possible  that  other  contaminants,  especially  those 
occurring  in  high  concentrations  in  the  microlayer,  could  also 
be  adsorbed  to  floating  plastic  debris.  Therefore,  a  potential  for 
the  transfer  of  certain  organic  pollutants  from  plastics  to 
organisms  that  ingest  them  does  exist.  Plastics  may  serve  as  a 
vehicle  for  pollutant  transport  that  may  enhance  exposure  of 
organisms;  however,  if  plastics  also  concentrate  contaminants 
from  the  water  this  would  result  in  an  even  greater  hazard  to 
marine  organisms. 

The  other  aspect  of  chemical-induced  toxicosis  resulting 
from  plastic  ingestion  is  that  of  the  potential  release  of  chemicals 
from  the  plastic  to  the  organism.  In  the  second  experiment, 
none  of  the  extracts  of  the  acidic  digestive  solutions,  or  the 
hexane  extraction  of  plastic  pellets  contained  quantifiable 
concentrations  of  any  of  the  hydrocarbon  contaminants.  These 
data  suggest  that  even  when  exposed  to  mild  heat,  acids,  and 
hexane,  polyethylene  pellets  did  not  release  appreciable 
quantities  of  chemicals.  However,  plastics  subjected  to  real 
avian  digestive  systems  would  also  be  exposed  to  digestive 
enzymes  and  tor  possibly  much  longer  periods  of  time.  Ryan 
( 1988b)  found  that  domestic  chickens  fed  polyethv  lene  pellets 
retained  98.3%  ofthemoveran  18-day  period.  Moreover,  there 
are  many  types  of  plastics  and  additives  to  plastics  that  could 
potentially  be  released  during  digestive  processes  in  marine 
vertebrates. 

Results  of  this  study  show  that  raw  material  plastic  pellets 
are  becoming  increasingly  more  common  in  areas  of  the  Pacific 
Ocean  far  removed  from  industrial  sources.  Although  tar  balls 
were  once  considered  more  common  and  widely  distributed 
than  marine  plastics,  their  occurrence  in  the  present  stud)  was 
less  than  that  of  plastics  even  in  areas  where  oil  development 
and  tanker  traffic  is  hea\  \ .  Plastic  pellets  do  have  the  potential 
to  adsorb  certain  organic  contaminants  from  seawater:  however, 
the  types  of  compounds  that  can  be  adsorbed  and  possibly 
concentrated  is  not  well  understood.  Polyethylene  pellets 
subjected  lo  conditions  simulating  the  avian  digestive  system 
did  not  release  detectable  levels  of  chemicals  However,  other 
types  of  plastics,  and  those  that  contain  additives,  were  not 
tested. 

Clearly,  fish,  seabirds,  and  other  marine  organisms  will 
continue  to  be  exposed  to  plastics  at  increasing  rates.  Regulations 
prohibiting  ocean  dumping  of  plastics  have  already  been 
enacted:  however,  recycling,  waste  management,  degradable 
plastics,  and  other  alternatives  must  continue  to  he  developed 
and  implemented  to  abate  the  global  problem  of  plastics  in  the 
oceans  of  the  world. 


|0d 


This  project  was  part  of  the  First  Joint  US-USSR  Central 
Pacific  Expedition  aboard  the  Soviet  Research  Vessel,  Akademik 
Korolev.  We  express  our  appreciation  to  the  US  Fish  and 
Wildlife    Service.    USA,    and    the    State    Committee    for 


Hydrometeorology.  USSR,  who  made  our  participation  possible. 
We  also  thank  H.  O'Connor,  A.  Tsyban,  O.  Rostovsev,  Y.  Volodkovich, 
B.  Aleksandrov,  L.  Polishchuk,  S.  Kohl,  A.  Krynitsky,  M  Wong,  and 
P.  Wills. 


2.6     The  Role  of  Solar  Irradiation  in  the 
Oxidative  Transformation  of 
Benzo(a)pyrene 

NATALYA  I.  IRHA,  EHA  R.  URBAS.  and  UVE  E.  K1RSO 
Institute  of  Chemistry,  Estonian  Academy  of  Sciences,  Tallinn,  ESSR 


Introduction 

Organic  pollutants  entering  water  bodies,  including  the 
oceans,  contain  a  wide  range  of  substances.  Some  of  these  are 
quite  easily  subjected  to  degradation  under  the  action  of  natural 
agents,  while  many  other  compounds  are  stable  and  persist  in 
various  compartments  of  the  ecosystem.  Among  the  persistent 
compounds  are  the  carcinogens  belonging  to  the  polycyclic 
aromatic  hydrocarbon  (PAH)  group.  It  has  been  established 
that  PAH' s  enter  the  ocean  in  several  ways,  emissions  into  the 
atmosphere  as  a  result  of  incomplete  combustion  of  fuels, 
spillage  during  transportation  of  oil,  and  so  forth.  On  the  other 
hand,  it  is  known  that  there  exists  a  natural  occurrence  of 
PAH's  (natural  background)  in  the  oceans.  It  is  the  view  of 
several  researchers  (Tsyban,  1975;  Izrael.  1984;  Kirso  et  ai. 
1988)  that  the  main  mechanism  of  self-purification  of  the 
hydrosphere  from  carcinogenic  PAH' s  is  biological  ( bacterial ) 
oxidation.  However,  there  are  also  other  mechanisms  for 
removal,  including  photooxidation  under  solar  irradiation  ( Mill 
etai,  1981;  Bockris,  1982).  It  may  be  assumed  that  this  process 
plays  a  significant  role,  especially  in  the  surface  water  layer 
where  the  content  of  soluble  oxygen  is  near  \00c/c  saturation 
(i.e.,  10 '■'  mol/1).  There  are  numerous  factors  that  modify  this 
process,  including  the  physicochemical  characteristics  of  water 
( turbidity ,  transparency,  and  the  presence  of  other  compounds ) 
and  the  air  above  the  sea  surface  (condition  of  the  atmosphere, 
i.e.,  environment  and  weather  conditions).  Figure  1  illustrates 
the  characteristic  sunlight  spectra  at  the  sea  surface  (Ranby  & 
Rabek.  1978).  Photochemical  reactions  in  the  marine 
environment  are  also  moderated  by  the  level  of  atmospheric 
pollution  with  aerosol  particles  and  smoke,  as  well  as  changes 
in  ozone  and  other  impurities.  Solar  irradiation  at  wavelengths 
less  than  285  nm  is  to  a  large  extent  absorbed  by  ozone  in  the 
upper  layer  of  the  atmosphere.  Therefore,  the  active  spectra  for 
this  process  are  usually  at  wavelengths  greater  than  285  nm. 
Variations  in  the  characteristics  of  the  ozone  layer  therefore 
influence  all  the  photochemical  processes  occurring  on  the 
oceans'  surface. 


1000 


E 
o 

200 

3. 

u 

50 

o 

m 

10 

S-4 

n. 

UJ 


0.5 


0.1 


ISO 


320 


360 


400 


X,,nm 

Fig.  1 .    Seasonal  variations  in  solar  spectra  at  the  sea  surface.    I  =  July, 

2  =  December.  E  =  Spectral  Energy;  A.  =  Wavelength  (Ranby  & 
Rabek.  1978). 

The  extent  of  these  processes  and  their  contribution  to  self- 
purification  of  the  marine  environment  from  carcinogenic 
PAH's  are  determined  by  both  the  value  and  distribution  of 
solar  irradiation  energy  (Mill  et  al,  1981;  Rabek,  1985)andthe 
level  of  pollution  of  seawater,  as  well  as  the  concentration  and 
composition  of  pollutants.  The  latter  may  have  an  influence 
upon  the  pattern  and  intensity  of  the  degradation  processes  of 
PAH's  (Kirso  &  Gubergrits,  1971;  Gubergrits  et  al..  1975). 
Although  systematic  studies  have  been  carried  out  on  the 
photooxidation  of  individual  PAH's  in  water  (Kirso  et  ai, 
1971;  Gubergrits  etai,  1975;  Paalme  etai,  1976.  1983).  there 
are  few  data  on  these  processes  under  natural  conditions. 


197 


Therefore,  during  the  cruise  of  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev 
(July-November  1 988 ).  a  study  was  undertaken  on  the  kinetics 
of  the  oxidative  photolysis  of  a  typical  carcinogenic  PAH — 
benzol  a  tpyrene  (BaP) — (Clar,  197 1 )  in  the  Bering  Sea  and  the 
tropical  waters  of  the  Pacific  (Table  1 ). 

It  is  known  that  the  Bering  Sea  is  almost  wholly  in  the 
subarctic  zone,  excluding  its  northern  parts,  which  are  in  the 
arctic  temperature  zones  (Izrael  &  Tsyban,  1987).  The  main 
body  of  its  waters  is  characterized  by  a  subarctic  structure 
whose  specific  feature  is  the  existence  of  cold  and  warm 
intermediate  layers.  The  upper  layer  thickness  average 
25-50  m,  the  salinity  being  32.8-33.4%o  and  the  temperature, 
about  5  to  7°C.  According  to  Izrael  and  Tsyban  ( 1 987),  PAH"  s 
are  permanent  and  typical  components  of  these  ecosystems. 

TABLE  1 

Exposure  of  BaP  solution  in  seawater  (the  47th  cruise  of  the 
R/V  Akademik  Korolev). 


Month 

Exper. 

Coordinates 

Water 

Average  dose  of 

(1988) 

Number 

Temp. 
t=°C 

solar  radiation 
Q  MJ/m:  during 
the  first  3  hours 

Aiiyust 


1 

53°58'N/I76°28'W 

14.1 

1.48 

2 

53°58'N/176°28,W 

15.7 

1.09 

September 

3 

09°54'S/156°23,W 

26.4 

3.50 

4 

04°02'S/154°07'W 

27.0 

3.09 

5 

09°59'S/150°15'W 

27.0 

4.90 

6 

()9°()0'S/I50°0()'W 

27.0 

3.67 

October 

7 

09°00,S/150°00,W 

27.0 

2.70 

8 

09°0()'S/150°0()'W 

27.0 

3.00 

Taking  into  account  the  low  influence  of  this  area  from 
human  activities,  the  physicochemical  parameters  of  the 
atmosphere  above  these  waters  and  characteristics  of  the  surface 
water  layer,  a  study  of  sunlight  photolysis  of  PAH'  sin  seawater 

at  lower  temperatures  and  low  intensity  of  solar  irradiation  was 
of  interest.  The  same  experiment  was  carried  out  under  tropical 
conditions — that  is.  at  higher  temperatures  and  considerable 
insolation  with  a  salinity  of  35.4%o. 

Methods  and  Materials 

The  surface  water  samples  taken  at  a  depth  of  0  to  0.5  m 
were  sterilized  by  autoclaving  for  2  h.  cooled,  and  filtered 
through  main  layers  of  Sterilized  cloth  into  a  sterilized  dish. 
The  BaP  solution  in  seawater  was  prepared  in  5-1  glass  cylindrical 
reactors  whose  sides  were  covered  with  black  paper  (water 
column  height  20  cm).  Benzol  a  (pyrene  was  introduced  as  an 
ethanol  solution  (ethanol  content  up  to  0.01295 )  by  constantly 
mixing  with  a  magnetic  stirrer  for  15  minutes.  The  BaP 
concentration  was  varied  from  0.7  to  6.6  nanomoles  mm). 


This  solution  was  exposed  to  sunlight  at  the  temperatures  of  the 
surface  water  for  each  given  region.  Simultaneously,  the  total 
solar  irradiation  dose,  Q  (MJ/m:  per  h),  was  measured 
pyranometrically  (Table  I).  The  experiments  were  carried  out 
with  the  following  solutions: 

(a)  BaP  solution  in  seawater; 

(b)  BaP  solution  in  sterilized  seawater;  and 

(c)  BaP  solution  in  sterilized  seawater  protected  from 
light  by  black  paper  (autoxidation). 

The  exposures  lasted  for  approximately  3  h  in  the  first  half 
of  the  day.   The  solutions  were  periodically  sampled  and  the 
BaP  concentration  measured  by  chromatography  techniques. 
Conditions  of  analysis  were  as  follows: 

A  'Jasko'  HPLC  chromatograph  (Japan),  a 
fluorimetric  detector,  Xtx  =  295  nm,  Xcm  =  408 
nm,  solvent  methanol-water  (95:5)  isocratic 
regime,  eluent  flow-rate  0.7  ml/min  using  a 
25  x  0.25  cm  ODS  column,  sample  volume  was 
100  ul. 
Statistical  kinetic  data  processing  was  performed  using  the 
least-squares  method. 

Results  and  Discussion 

From  kinetic  data  (Figs.  2-5.  Table  2),  it  follows  that 
during  the  first  hour  of  exposure,  a  decrease  in  the  BaP 
concentrations  in  seawater  is  described  by  a  formal-kinetic 
equation  for  the  first-order  reaction  where  c0  and  c,  are  the 
initial  BaP  concentration  at  zero  time,  and  that  at  a  certain  time 
t,  k  is  the  constant  of  the  first-order  reaction,  the  dimensions  for 
this  constant  are  per  second  (s  '). 

ln(c,/c,)  =  kt 

The  rate  constant  values  obtained  for  the  Bering  Sea  areas, 
the  tropical  part  of  the  Pacific  and  the  Caroline  Atoll  (Table  2) 
are  of  the  same  order  as  those  found  (Mill  et  <//..  1981)  by 
photolysis  of  BaP  in  water  (X  =  366  nm.  BaP  concentration 
5x  10s  m,  t°  =  22-28°C,  k  =  3.86  ±0.71  x  10V).  The  half 
decay  time  of  BaP  under  these  conditions  was  0.69  h.  In  our 
experiment  the  average  rate  constant  value  per  unit  Q  was 
(1.1  ±0.1)  10V. 

Irrespective  of  the  areas  under  study  and  the  sterility 
of  water  in  those  treatments  that  were  subjected  to 
photolysis  (Table  2).  the  initial  stage  of  the  process,  as 
mentioned  above,  is  well  described  by  an  equation  for  the  first 
order  kinetics.  At  the  same  time,  according  to  experimental 
data  (Figs.  2-4),  the  oxidation  of  BaP  in  seawater 
without  sunlight  (autoxidation)  for  the  Bering  Sea  areas  and 
the  tropical  pari  of  the  Pacific  is  described  by  a  formal- 
kinetic  of  a  second-order  type  (r  =  0.90-0.98).  The  rate 
constant  value  of  BaP  autoxidation  in  the  Bering  Sea  water 
at  a  concentration  of  5  x  10  s  M  (July,  t0=21°C, 
Q,,r0.68  MJ/m"  per  h)  was  (0.4  ±  0.01)  104M's!.  but  in 
the  tropical  part  at  a  concentration  of  1.7  x  10s  (October 
t°=27°C.  Qr,,~3.00  MJ/nr  per  hi  (9.08  ±  1.90)  1()4M  's  '. 
respectively. 


198 


TABLE  2 

Kinetic  characteristics  of  photochemical  transformation  of 
BaP  in  seawater  under  solar  irradiation  in  the  following  areas: 

(a)  the  Bering  Sea 

(b)  the  tropical  part  of  the  Pacific 

(c)  the  Caroline  Atoll 

(47th  cruise  of  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev,  July-November  19881. 


Experiment 

Initial  BaP 

Rate 

Number  of 

Correlation 

Sterility  of 

No.  See 

concentration 

constant 

data  points 

coefficient 

media 

Table  1 

M  10 K 

10V'(k±n) 

r  (first-order) 

(a) 

1. 

1.47 

1.69±0.13 

5 

0.99 

- 

2. 

4.20 

1.60  ±0.08 

7 

0.99 

+ 

4.44 

1.20  +  0.16 
(b) 

6 

0.97 

- 

3. 

6.59 

2.84  ±0.48 

5 

0.96 

+ 

2.85 

2.85  ±0.98 

4 

0.90 

- 

4. 

2.06 

1.60  ±0.49 

(C) 

4 

0.92 

+ 

5. 

1.90 

2.99  ±0.70 

4 

0.95 

- 

2.14 

4.05  ±0.51 

4 

0.98 

- 

6. 

0.70 

4.20  ±0.11 

4 

0.99 

+ 

7. 

11.10 

8.77  ±0.23 

4 

0.99 

- 

8. 

2.00 

3.67  ±0.27 

6 

0.99 

- 

C/Co 


c 
o 


c 

— 

c 

<u 
o 

c 
o 
o 

a. 

CO 


1.01 

s*-.- 

-•- 

'* 

►           • 

"c 

6 

0.5 

O 

/ 

3 

va.a 

b  * 

o 


0 


? 


t  .hour 


Fig.  2.  Kinetics  of  BaP  degradation  under  sunlight  irradiation  at  the  surface 
of  the  Bering  Sea  (coordinates:  67°42'N  1 15°43'W):  a)  in  sterilized 
seawater:  b)  in  non-sterilized  seawater;  and  cl  by  autoxidation  (w/o 
light). 

Thus,  in  the  areas  of  exposure  the  rate  constant  values  of 
BaP  autoxidation  in  seawater  differed  within  one  order  of 
magnitude.  The  shape  of  the  kinetic  curves  (Figs.  2-4)  also 
gives  evidence  of  a  negligible  decrease  in  BaP  concentration 
over  time  without  sunhght. 

While  in  laboratory  experiments  by  photo-initiated 
UV-irradiation  within  a  relatively  wide  wavelength  range — 
around  200  nm — and  a  high  oxygen  atmosphere  in  a  liquid 
medium,  the  degradation  of  BaP  did  not  change  until  the 


C/Co 
1.0 


c 
o 


•5  0.5 


c 
o 
o 

(X 

a 

CO 


Fig.  3. 


p 
© 

0 

c 

4 

3 

2 

G)"n 

b© 

-n  - 

©00 

~© 

OO-- 
a  ~ 

1 

©u 

o 


0 


9 


t  .hour 


Kinetics  of  BaP  degradation  under  sunlight  irradiation  at  the  surface 
ofthe  Bering  Sea  (coordinates:  53°58'N  175°28'W):  a)  in  sterilized 
seawater:  b)  in  non-sterilized  seawater;  and  c)  by  autoxidation 
(w/o  light). 


disappearance  of  the  initial  substance  (zero-order  reaction) 
(Gubergritse/fl/.,  1975:  Paalme  etal,  1983).  Under  natural 
conditions  in  water  (i.e.,  by  sunlight  photolysis),  a  decrease  in 
the  reaction  rate  is  observed  after  the  first  hour  of  exposure 
(Figs.  2-5 ).  This  is  especially  noticeable  in  the  Bering  Sea  area 
( Figs.  2-3 ).  From  the  graphs  ( Figs.  2-5 ),  it  follows  that  the  BaP 
half-decay  times  (t":)  in  the  Bering  Sea  waters  were  not  less 
than  1  h.  but  in  the  tropical  part  ofthe  Pacific,  they  were  0.6  h. 
The  initial  rate  constant  value  of  sunlight  photolysis  of  BaP  in 
the  tropical  zone  water  averaged  8.9  x  1 O12  mole  s  ',  exceeding 


199 


0  12  3  4         t,  hour 

F;ig.  4.  Kinetics  of  BaP  degradation  under  sunlight  irradiation  in  the  tropical 
part  of  the  Pacific  (coordinates:  09°54'N  I56°23'W):  a)  in  sterilized 
seawater;  b)  in  non-sterilized  seawater;  and  c)  by  autoxidation  (w/o 
light). 


2     t,  hour 


Fig-  5.  Kinetics  of  BaP  degradation  under  sunlight  irradiation  in  the  lagoon 
of  the  Caroline  Atoll  (coordinates:  09°54'N  I5fv2.vwi:  al  j„ 
sterilized  seawater;  bi  in  nonsterilized  seawater:  c)  by  autoxidation 
lu/o  light). 

by  x3  the  rate  tor  the  Bering  Sea  area  at  similar  initial 
BaP  concentrations  (2.44  x  10  i:  mole  s  ').  For  comparison, 
it  may  he  pointed  oui  thai  at  the  initial  concentrations  of  10 "  M, 
the  initial  rate  of  sunlight  photolysis  of  BaP  in  the  Caroline 
Atoll  is  much  higher  than  that  found  for  BaP  autoxidation 
in  water  under  laboratory  condition  1.67  x  10  i:  and 
0.3  x  10 -|:  mole  s  '.  respectively  (Kirso  et  al.,  1983). 

Thus,  experimental  data,  as  expected,  gave  evidence  of  a 
dependence  of  BaP  degradation  on  the  location  of  exposure, 
intensity  of  solar  UV-irradiation,  and  temperature  of  the 
environment,  and  data  agreed  well  w  ith  the  results  obtained  by 
Graupera  and  associates  (Graupera  et  al.,  1988).  Obviously, 
during  photolysis  of  BaP  by  sunlight  in  seawater,  the  existence 
ofmicroimpurities,  inorganic  components,  salinity,  and  general 


water  composition  all  have  a  major  impact  on  photochemical 
reactions  in  different  areas  of  the  world  oceans.  A  comparison 
of  experimental  kinetic  parameters  and  literature  data  (Mill 
et  al.,  1981 )  suggests  that  proceeding  from  the  values  of  k  at 
T"-  of  BaP  under  similar  conditions  of  its  photolysis  in  water 
(X  =  366  nm  and  concentration  of  5  x  10  s  M)  the  value  of 
quantum  yield  0evp  (the  number  of  molecules  subjected  to 
transformation  as  a  result  of  adsorption  of  one  energy  quantum ) 
is  almost  equal  to  <p  -  5.4  x  10"4 — that  is,  less  than  one  (Mill 
et  al..  1981).  Consequently,  the  processes  under  study  are 
complex,  involving  competing  chemical  reactions.  Thus,  the 
degradation  of  BaP  is  initiated  directly  or  indirectly  and  proceeds 
under  solar  irradiation. 

Photochemical  reactions  were  investigated  with  soluble 
oxygen  in  the  presence  of  different  inorganic  and  organic- 
components  in  water  bodies.  Zafiriou  (Zafiriou  et  al..  1989) 
presented  the  following  scheme  for  generation  of  free  radicals 
in  the  marine  environment: 

O,  +  hv     >  initiation  of  radicals  R' 

R-  +  R,NO     >  RNO\  R:NOH,  R:NOR 

seawater  +  O,  +  hv  -  -  >  initiation >  oxygen  con- 
taining radicals 

seawater  +  0:  +  hv >  superoxide 

0.+  NO  -  - >00  *  NO*  H+  -  ->  *  NO,  -  ->  02 

seawater  +  *0;  +  hv  — >  H  *  O  *  OH  product 
seawater  +  H  *  O  *  OH  +  hv  -  -  ->  *02  +  H:*0 

According  to  (Mopper  et  al..  1989)  the  concentration  of 
high-energy  ( more  than  4  kcal/mole )  oxygen-containing  radicals 
in  seawater  is  low  and  makes  for  hydroxyl  groups  (OH) — for 
example,  in  subtropical  coastal  areas  1 1.9  x  10  ls  M  and  for 
open  sea  1.1  x  10  IBM,  correspondingly.  Consequently,  it  may 
be  assumed  that  BaP  (and  other  PAH's)  is  subjected  to 
photodegradation  due  mainly  to  secondary  photochemical 
reactions  w  ith  different  reactive  radicals  formed  directly  under 
the  action  of  light  quanta  or  indirectly  (see  the  scheme). 
According  to  our  results,  the  rate  of  BaP  transformation  depends 
primarily  on  the  sunlight  intensity.  Obviously,  then,  the 
mechanism  of  photochemical  oxidation  of  organic  xenobiotics 
of  the  PAH  type  is  not  different  in  northern  and  southern  areas 
(i.e.,  the  amount  of  oxidizing  particles  sufficient  for 
transformation  is  generated  whose  excess  favors  the  first-order 
reaction  [pseudomonomolecular]  relative  to  BaP). 

A  study  of  the  influence  of  inorganic  salts  and  micro- 
impurities  on  the  photochemical  processes  in  the  marine 
ecosystems  requires  further  research. 

To  sum  up,  it  should  be  pointed  out  that  the  experiments 
(under  natural  conditions)  were  carried  out  with  only  one 
reference  PAH.  ben/o(  a)pyrene,  and  in  the  marine  environment 
many  other  PAH"s  are  present  (see  Fig.  6).  To  estimate  the 
reactivities  of  other  PAHs  undergoing  photooxidation  in 
seawater.  the  data  obtained  by  Paalme  et  al.  (1988)  were 
considered.  It  appears  that  the  rate  of  the  process  for  individual 
homologs  differs  by  factors  of  over  140  (Fig.  6).  Anthracene 
and  its  derivatives  are  easily  oxidized,  while  the  more  condensed 
systems — for  example,  coronene —  remain  more  stable.  It 
may  be  assumed  that  as  a  result  of  photochemical  oxidation,  the 
quantitative  ratio  of  PAH's  m  the  marine  environment  shifts 
low, ml  the  heavier  homologs. 


200 


a 
□ 
□ 


20 


10 


EL 


.-•• 


PI 

•■■ 

-■■' 
-•■' 


/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
,-■ 

.■■' 

,-■ 
,-■ 
/ 

/ 

/ 


BaP     N 


K 

Ac 


JZL 


R 


-■•■ 
.••■■ 


Pn 


Bba        BaA       TF       Chr 


^A 


Y\  B   B   B    ^ 


/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 

/ 

/ 
/ 
/ 
.-- 
.-- 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 
/ 

J 


PI 


5 

CPAH 


/ 
/ 


/ 
/ 


-  3 


Pv 


Per    BacA     BajA    BahA         BeP       Cor        BkF      BbF 


Fig.  6.    Relative  rates  (v)  of  photoinitialed  transformation  of  PAH's  in  water:  (1 )  (Paalme  etal.,  1983);  and  their  content  (ng/1)  in  the  water  of  the  Bering  Sea; 
(2);  and  the  Baltic;  and  (3)  (Kirso  el  at..  1989). 


Thus,  under  conditions  similar  to  natural  ones  (i.e.,  under 
sunlight),  it  has  been  shown  that  a  certain  amount  of  PAH's 
may  be  subjected  to  sunlight  photolysis.  The  degree  of  BaP 
transformation  in  the  experiments  was  governed  by  the  intensity 


of  total  sunlight  irradiation  in  a  given  region  and  by  the 
conditions  of  exposure  (temperature,  turbidity,  etc.). 
Autoxidation  plays  an  insignificant  role  in  self-purification  of 
the  marine  environment  from  BaP. 


201 


Chapter  2  References 


Balazs,  G.  (1985).  Impact  of  ocean  debris  on  marine  turtles: 
entanglement  and  ingestion.  In  Proceedings  of  the  Workshop 
on  the  Fate  and  Impact  of  Marine  Debris,  27-29  November 
1984,  Honolulu,  Hawaii  (R.  S.  Shomura  &  H.  O.  Yoshida, 
eds.),  pp.  387-429,  NOAA  Technical  Memorandum  NMFS. 
NOA  ATM-NMSF-SWFS-54,  US  Department  of  Commerce. 

Ballschmitter,  K.  &  Zell.  M.  ( 1 980).  Analysis  of  polychlorinated 
biphenyls  (PCB's)  by  capillary  gas  chromatography. 
Frensenius '  Z.  Anal.  Chem.  302,  20-3 1 . 

Bockris.  J.  O.  (1982).  Environmental  Chemistry:  Moscow. 
Khimiia  Publishers,  Moscow,  670  pp.  (Russian  translation) 

Carpenter,  E.  J.,  Anderson,  S.  J..  Harvey,  G.  R..  Miklas,  H.  P. 
&  Peck.  B.  B.  (1972).  Polystyrene  spherules  in  coastal 
waters.  Science  178,  749-750. 

Carr,  A.  ( 1 987 ).  Impact  of  nondegradable  marine  debris  on  the 
ecology  and  survival  outlook  of  sea  turtles.  Mar.  Pollut. 
Bull.  18,  352-356. 

Chernyak.  S.  M„  Kolobova,  T.  P.  &  Vronskaya,  V.  M.  ( 1985). 
A  study  of  chlorinated  hydrocarbons.  In  Studies  of  the  Baltic 
Sea  Ecosystem,  No.  3.  Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers, 
Leningrad,  (in  Russian) 

Chernyak,  S.  M.  &  Mikbaleva.  I.  M.  (1985).  Chlorinated 
hydrocarbons  in  various  media  constituting  the  Baltic  Sea 
environment.  In  Studies  of  the  Baltic  Sea  Ecosystem,  No.  2. 
Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers,  Leningrad,  (in  Russian) 

Chernyak,  S.  M.,  Vronskaya.  V.  M.  &  Kolobova,  T.  P.  (1989). 
Chlorinated  hydrocarbons.  In  Studies  of  the  Bering  Sea 
Ecosystem,  No.  2.  Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers,  Leningrad. 
(in  Russian) 

Chernyak,  S.  M.,  Vronskaya.  V.  M.  &  Kolobova,  T.  P.  (1992). 
Migratory  and  bioaccumulative  peculiarities  in  the 
biogeochemical  cycling  of  chlorinated  hydrocarbon.  In 
Results  of  the  Third  Joint  US-USSR  Bering  &  Chukchi  Seas 
Expedition  (BERPAC).  Summer  1988 (P.  A.  Nagel,  ed.).  US 
Fish  and  Wildlife  Service.  Washington,  D.C. 

Clar,  E.  (1971).  Polycyclic  Hydrocarbons,  Vol.  2.  Academic 
Press,  London. 

Colton,  J.  B.  Jr.,  Knapp.  F.  D.  &  Burns,  B.  R.  ( 1974).  Plastic 
particles  in  surface  waters  of  the  northwestern  Atlantic. 
Science  185,491-197. 

Connors,  P.  G.  &  Smith.  K.  G.  ( 1982).  Ocean  plastic  particle 
pollution:  Suspected  effect  on  fat  deposition  in  red  phalaropes. 
Mar.  Pollut.  Bull.  13.  1 8-20. 

Day,  R.  H.  &  Shaw.  D.  G.  (1987).  Patterns  in  the  abundance 
of  pelagic  plastic  and  tar  in  the  North  Pacific  Ocean.  Mar. 
Pollut.  Bull.  18.311-316. 

Day.  R.  H..  Wehle,  D.  H.  S.  &  Coleman,  F.  C.  (1985).  Ingestion 
of  plastic  pollutants  by  marine  birds.  In  Proceedings  of  the 
Workshop  on  the  Fate  and  Impact  of  Marine  Debris, 
pp.  27-29,  November  1984,  Honolulu,  Hawaii  (R.  S.  Shomura 
&  H.  O.  Yoshida,  eds.).  pp.  387-429,  NOAA  Technical 
Memorandum  NMFS,  NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFS-54,  US 
Department  of  Commerce. 


Fedoseeva,  G.  E.  &  Khesina,  A.  Ya.  (1968).    The  use  of 

quasilinear  luminescence  spectra  for  the  quantitative 

determination  of  a  series  of  polycyclic  hydrocarbons. 

J.  Appl.  Spectroscopy,  Vol.  9  2,282-288.  (in  Russian) 
Fry,  D.  M.,  Fefer,  S.  I.  &  Sileo,  L.  (1987).  Ingestion  of  plastic 

debris  by  Laysan  albatrosses  and  wedge-tailed  shearwaters 

in  the  Hawaiian  Islands.  Mar.  Pollut.  Bull.  18.  339-343. 
Furness,  R.  W.  ( 1985).  Plastic  particle  pollution:  Accumulation 

by  procellariiform  seabirds  at  Scottish  colonies.  Mar.  Pollut. 

Bull.  16,  103-106. 
Graupera.  B.  M.,  Braunera,  M.  S.,  Gonzalez,  R.  C,  Conde, 

I.  A.  P.  &  Solionova,  L.  ( 1988).  Studies  on  the  degradation 

of  benzo(a)pyrene  by  solar  ultraviolet  light  and  temperature. 

Rev.  Cubana  Hig.  Epidemiol.  2691.  106-1 16. 
Gubergrits,  M.  Ya.,  Kirso,  U.  E.  &  Paalme,  L.  P.  (1975). 

Transformation  of  Carcinogenic  Compounds  in  the 

Hydrosphere.  Znanije  Publishers,  Moscow,  (in  Russian) 
Irha,  N.  I.,  Urba,  E.  R.  &  Kirso.  W.  V.  ( 1992).  Distribution  of 

PAH's.    In  Results  of  the  Third  Joint  US-USSR  Bering  & 

Chukchi  Seas  Expedition  (BERPAC),  Summer  1988  (P.  A. 

Nagel,  ed.).    US  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service,  Washington. 

D.C. 
Izrael,  Yu.  A.  (1984).    Ecology  and  Control  of  the  State  of 

Environment.    Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers,  Moscow,    (in 

Russian) 
Izrael,  Yu.  A.  &  Tsyban,  A.  V.  (1987).     Comprehensive 

Analysis  of  the  Ecosystem  of  the  Bering  Sea.  Gidrometeoizdat 

Publishers.  Leningrad,  (in  Russian) 
Izrael,  Yu.  A.  &  Tsyban.  A.  V.  ( 1989).  Ocean  Ecology  under 

Human  Impact.    Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers,  Leningrad, 

527  pp.  (in  Russian) 
Kimball,  W.  H.  &  Munir,  Z.  A.  ( 1971 ).  The  corrosion  of  lead 

shot  in  a  simulated  waterfowl  gizzard.  J.  Wildl.  Manage.  2, 

360-365. 
Kirso,  U.,  Belyhk,  L.  &  Stom,  D.  (1983).     Kinetics  of 

benzo(a)pyrene  oxidation  in  aqueous  solution.  Oxid.  Comm. 

4(1-4),  35-44. 
Kirso,  U.  &  Gubergrits,  M.  ( 197 1 ).   Kinetics  of  oxidation  of 

3,4-benzpyrene.  phenol  and  5  methylresorcinol  activated  by 

UV-irradiation.     Proceedings  of  Estonian  Academy  of 

Science,  Chemistry,  Geology  20(2).  134-139.  (in  Russian) 
Kirso,  U.,  Paalme,  L.,  Voll.  M.,  Urbas,  E.  &  Irha,  N.  ( 1990). 

Accumulation  of  carcinogenic  hydrocarbons  at  the  sediment 

water  interface.  Marine  Chemistry  30.  337-341 . 
Kirso.   U.,   Stom,   D..   Belykh.   L.   &   Irha,  N.   (1988). 

Transformation  of  Carcinogenic  and  Toxic  Substances  in 

the  Hydrosphere.  Valgus  Publishers,  Tallinn,  (in  Russian) 
Laist.  D.  ( 1 987 ).  Overview  of  the  biological  effects  of  lost  and 

discarded  plastic  debris  in  the  marine  environment.   Mar. 

Pollut.  Bull.  18.319-326. 
Lee,  M.  L.,  Milos.  V.,  Novotny.  K.  &  Bartle.  D.  (1987). 

Analytical  Chemistry  of  Polycyclic  Aromatic  Compounds. 

Academic  Press,  New  York.  5.  441—449. 


203 


Mamotov,  G.  &  Wehry,  E.  (1988).  Chemical  reactivity  of 
polycyclic  organic  compounds  absorbed  on  coal  fly  ash  and 
related  solid  surface  final  report.  Energy  Res.  Abstr. 

Medinets,  V.  I..  Solov'ev,  V.  G.  &  Glebov,  B.  V.  (1992). 
Cesium- 137  in  the  seawaters.  In  Results  of  the  Third  Joint 
US-USSR  Bering  &  Chukchi  Seas  Expedition  (BERPAC), 
Summer  1988  (P.  A.  Nagel.  ed.).  US  Fish  and  Wildlife 
Service,  Washington,  D.C. 

Mill,  T.,  Mabey,  W.  K.,  Lan,  B.  Y.  &  Baraze.  A.  (1981). 
Photolysis  of  polycyclic  aromatic  hydrocarbons  in  water. 
Chemosphere  10(11/12).  1281-1290. 

Mopper.  K.  &  Zhou,  X.  ( 1989).  Photochemical  production  of 
hydroxy  radicals  at  the  sea  surface:  implications  of  oceanic 
carbon  cycling.  32nd IUPAC Congress,  Stockholm.  Bookof 
Abstr.  p.  2. 

Moms,  R.  J.  (1980).  Plastic  debris  in  the  surface  waters  of  the 
South  Atlantic.  Mar.  Pollut.  Bull.  11,  164-166. 

Nagaya.  Y.  &  Nakamura,  K.  (1985).  A  study  of  certain 
radionuclides  deposited  in  the  deep  waters  of  the  Pacific 
through  radioactive  precipitation.  In  Comprehensive  Global 
Monitoring  of  the  World  Ocean.  Proceedings  of  the  First 
International  Symposium.  2-10  October  1983.  Vol.  2 
( Yu.  A.  Izrael, ed. ).  pp.  429—44 1 .  Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers, 
Leningrad,  (in  Russian) 

Niassat,  P.,  Echardt,  I.  &  Ottenwalder.  I.  (1968).  Presence  of 
benzo3, 4pyrene  in  the  waters  of  the  Clipperton  Atoll  lagoon. 
Comp.  Rend.  Acad.  Sci.  Paris.  Series  D.  267,  1771-1774. 
(in  French) 

Paalme.  L.  &  Gubergrits,  M.  (1976).  Kinetics  of  separate  and 
co-photodegradation  of  benzo(a)pyrene  and  3- 
methylchloranthene.  Proceedings  of  Estonian  Academy  of 
Science.  Chemistry,  Geology  25(4),  271-275.  (in  Russian) 

Paalme.  L.,  Uibonuu,  H..  Gubergrits,  M.  &  Jacquignon.  P. 
(19831.  The  initiated  oxidation  of  polycyclic  arenes  in 
aqueous  solution.  Oxid.  Conun.  4(  1-4).  27-34. 

Pruter,  A.  T.  ( 1987).  Sources,  quantities  and  distribution  of 
persistent  plastics  in  the  marine  environment.  Mar.  Pollut. 
Bull.  18.305-310. 

Rabek,  J.  F.  ( 1982).  Experimental  Methods  in  Photochemistry 
and Photophysics.  Vol.  1,  Mir  Publishers.  Moscow.  (Russian 
translation) 

Ranby.  B.  &  Rabek.  J.  F.  (1975).  Photode gradation, 
Photooxidation  and  Photo-stabilization  of  Polymers.  Mir 
Publishers.  Moscow.  (Russian  translation) 

Ryan.  P.  G.  ( 1 987).  The  effects  of  ingested  plastic  on  seabirds: 
Correlations  between  plastic  load  and  body  condition. 
Environ.  Pollut.  46,  1 19   125. 

Ryan,  P.  G.  ( 1988a).  Plastic  ingestion  and  PCB's  in  seabirds: 

Is  there  a  relationship?  Mar.  Pollut.  Bull.  19.  174-176. 
Ryan.  P.  G.  (1988b).    Effects  of  ingested  plastic  on  seabird 
feeding:  Evidence  from  chickens.    Mar.  Pollut.  Bull.  19. 
1 25- 128. 
Shaw,  D.  G.  ( 1977).    Pelagic  tar  and  plastic  in  the  Gulf  of 
Alaska  and  Bering  Sea:  ll)75.  Sci.  Total  Environ.  8.  13-20. 
Shaw,  D.  G.  &  Mapes.  G.  A.  ( 1979).  Surface  circulation  and 
the  distribution  of  pelagic  tar  and  plastic.  Mar.  Pollut.  Bull. 
10.  160-162. 


Shilina.  L.  I.  (1982).  In  Integrated  Global  Monitoring  of 
Natural  Environmental  Pollution,  pp.  238-242. 
Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers,  Leningrad,  (in  Russiani 

Shpolsky.  E.  V..  Il'in,  A.  A.  etal.  ( 1952).  Fluorescence  spectra 
of  coronene  in  frozen  solutions.  Dokladny  AN  SSSR  1 . 
935-939.  (in  Russian) 

Tanabe,  S.,  Tatsukawa.  R..  Kawano.  M.  &  Hidaka.  H.  ( 1982). 
Global  distribution  and  atmospheric  input  of  chlorinated 
hydrocarbons  in  the  western  Pacific,  eastern  Indiana  and 
Antarctic  Oceans.  J.  Oceanogr.  Soc.  Jpn..  Vol.  38. 

Tanabe,  S.  (1985).  Distribution,  behavior  and  fate  of  PCB's  in 
the  marine  environment.  J.  Oceanogr.  Soc.  Jpn..  Vol.  41. 

Tsyban,  A.  V.  (1975).  Bacterioneuston  and  problems  of 
degradation  in  surface  films  of  organic  substances  released 
into  the  sea.  Prog.  Water  Technol.  7(3/4).  792-799. 

Tsyban,  A.  V.,  Khesina,  A.  Ya.,  Ventzel,  M.  V.,  Volodkovich, 
Yu.  L.  &  Korsak.  M.  N.  el  al.  (1985a).  Occurrence  and 
microbial  degradation  of  the  carcinogenic  hydrocarbon. 
BaP.  in  open  waters  of  the  Baltic  Sea.  In  Studies  of  the  Baltic 
Sea  Ecosystem,  pp.  218-234.  Vol.  2.  Gidrometeoizdat 
Publishers.  Leningrad,  (in  Russian) 

Tsyban.  A.  V.,  Panov.  G.  V..  Ventzel,  M.  V..  Volodkovich. 
Yu.  L.  &  Korsak,  M.  N.  ( 1986).  Long-term  environmental 
studies  on  impacted  and  background  regions.  In  Integrated 
Global  Monitoring  of  the  Status  of  the  Biosphere. 
pp.  45-60.  Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers,  Leningrad,  (in 
Russian) 

Tsyban,  A.  V..  Volodkovich.  Yu.  L.  &  Belyaeva.  O.  L.  (1987). 
A  study  of  the  circulation  of  benzo(a)pyrene  in  the  Bering 
Sea.  In  Comprehensive  Analysis  of  the  Bering  Sea 
Ecosystem,  pp.  218-232.  Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers. 
Leningrad,  (in  Russian) 

Tsyban.  A.  V.,  Volodkovich.  Yu.  L.,  Panov,  G.  V..  Khesina. 
A.  Ya.  &  Yemakov.  Ye.  A.  (1985b).  Distribution  and 
microbial  oxidation  of  carcinogenic  hydrocarbons  in  some 
regions  of  the  World  Ocean,  with  benzol  a  Ipyrene  as  the 
model  compound.  In  Environmental  Consequences  of 'Ocean 
Pollution,  pp.  88-112.  Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers. 
Leningrad,  (in  Russian) 

Vakulovskiy.  S.  M.  (ed.)  (1986).  Methodological 
Recommendations  for  the  Determination  of  Radioactive 
Contamination  of  Waters.  Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers. 
Moscow.  78  pp.  (in  Russian) 
Van  Franeker,  J.  A.  (1985).  Plastic  ingestion  m  the  North 
Atlantic  fulmar.  Mar.  Pollut.  Bull.  16.  367-369. 

Winston,  J.  E.  ( 1982).  Drift  plastic — An  expanding  niche  for 

a  marine  invertebrate'  Mar.  Pollut.  Bull.  10.  348-351. 
Wolfe.  D.  A.  ( 1 987 ).  Persistent  plastics  and  debris  in  the  ocean: 
An  international  problem  of  ocean  disposal.    Mar.  Pollut. 
Bull.  18.  303-305. 
Wong. C.S..  Green.  D.R.&Cretney.  W.  J.  (1 974 (.Quantitative 
tar  and  plastic  waste  distributions  in  the  Pacific  Ocean. 
Nature  247.  30-32. 
Zafiriou,  O.  C,  Dister,  B..  Moffett.  J.  M..  Micinski,  E.  & 
Blough,  N.  V.  (1989).  Photochemical  production  of  free 
radicals  in  the  marine  environment.  3  2nd  IUPAC Congress. 
Stockholm.    Book  ofAbstr.  p.  201. 


204 


Chapter  3: 

BIOLOGICAL  INVESTIGATIONS  IN 
THE  CENTRAL  PACIFIC 


Editors: 

CAMERON  B.  KEPLER  & 
MIKHAIL  N.  KORSAK 


3.1     A  Description  of  Bacterioplankton 

VASSILIY  M.  KUDRYATSEV,  VLADIMIR  O.  MAMAEV.  and  NADEZHDA  V.  SUKHANOVA 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology,  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  and  Academy  of  Sciences,  Moscow,  USSR 


Introduction 

An  assessment  of  the  role  played  by  bacteria  in 
biodegradation  processes  occurring  in  the  World  Ocean  requires 
data  concerning  bacterial  population  counts,  bacterial  population 
distributions,  and  a  number  of  other  functional  characteristics. 

Studies  carried  out  in  the  course  of  the  First  Joint 
US-USSR  Central  Pacific  Expedition  in  the  equatorial  Pacific 
and  the  South  China  Sea  produced  new  findings  characterizing 
the  present  state  of  microbiocoenoses  in  this  part  of  the  World 
Ocean. 

Materials  and  Methods 

The  microbiological  studies  described  below  were 
conducted  using  methods  set  out  in  several  handbooks 
(Romanenko&  Kuznetsov,  1974;Tsyban,  1 980; Tsyban etal.. 
1988).  Analyses  of  total  counts,  biomass,  bacterioplankton 
production,  indicator  group  distribution,  and  degradation 
process  rates  were  performed  at  1 8  stations.  The  samples  were 
taken  from  6  to  19  depths  using  5-1  Niskin  bottles.  To  allow  for 
overall  bacterial  counts,  samples  of  20-50  ml  were  passed 
through  "Synpor  8"  membrane  filters  with  pore  size  0.23  urn. 
The  filters  were  desalinated  onto  filter  paper  moistened  with 
distilled  water,  dried,  and  dyed  with  a  5%  carbolic  erythrosine 
solution.  The  bacteria  deposited  on  the  filters  were  counted  by 
direct  oil-immersion  microscopy  (xl350  magnification.  20 
visual  fields). 

The  average  bacteria  volume  was  assessed  by  measuring 
bacterial  cell  size  with  the  aid  of  an  ocular  ruler.  The  mean 
bacterial  cell  volume  was  found  to  be  0.3  urn'. 

The  daily  bacterial  biomass  production  rate  was  calculated 
on  the  basis  of  CO:  assimilation  in  darkness.  The  latter  was 
ascertained  using  a  radiocarbon  technique  (Romanenko.  1964; 
Sorokin.  1971a).  The  determinations  were  made  in 
1 00- 1 20-ml  jars.  The  radioactivity  of  the  working  solution  of 
carbon-labeled  sodium  carbonate  introduced  into  the  sample- 
containing  jars  was  18  x  106  counts/min.  The  samples  were 
incubated  in  darkness  for  24  h  at  the  temperature  of  the  water 
where  the  sample  was  taken.  Once  the  incubation  was 
completed,  the  samples  were  fixed  with  a  40%  formaldehyde 
solution,  then  passed  through  "Synpor-7"  filters  (pore  size 
0.35  (tm).  The  radioactivity  of  the  bacteria  deposited  on  the 
filters  was  measured  using  an  '•Intertechnique'"  liquid 
scintillation  counter.  The  scintillation  cocktail  was  ZhS-8. 
The  CO,  assimilation  rate  in  darkness  (Tass)  for  the  bacterial 
plankton  was  calculated  by  means  of  the  formula 

T        —     '*  x    Qart 

±  ass  ' 

R  xt 


where     r  the  radioactivity  of  the  bacterial  cells  on 

the  filter  (counts/min); 
the  hydrocarbonate  content  of  seawater 
(mg/1 )  determined  by  direct  titration  of 
0. IN  HC1  in  the  presence  of  methyl 
red; 
—    the  radioactivity  of  the  isotope  Nal4CO, 
used  in  the  experiment  (counts/min); 
t  the  incubation  time  (h). 

The  bacterial  biomass  production  was  obtained  by 
calculation,  setting  Ph  =  TMS  x  16.6.  Bacterial  plankton 
respiration  was  determined  by  applying  the  formula 


C„ 


k 


D  =  1J1, 


where      D 


—    the  amount  of  oxygen  expended  on  decom- 
position (mg  1 '  d  '); 
Tass      —    rate  ofCO:  assimilation  in  darkness  (|ig  of 

C  perl"1  d  ');  and 

the  coefficient  of  7  is  the  ratio  of  oxygen  uptake  to 

CO,  assimilation. 

The  studies  were  carried  out  in  the  tropical  and  equatorial 

portions  of  the  Pacific  Ocean,  as  well  as  in  the  South  China  Sea. 

The  locations  of  the  stations  are  indicated  on  the  Frontispiece. 

Results 

The  equatorial  Pacific  is  characterized  by  upwelling.  The 
latter  occurs  mostly  along  the  boundaries  of  west-to-east  zonal 
flows  and  alternates  with  surface-water  downwelling  zones. 
The  intrusion  of  deep  waters  rich  in  biogenic  elements  into  the 
euphotic  layer  determines  the  way  in  which  biocoenoses  develop 
(i.e.,  their  spatial  and  trophic  structures,  productivity,  and  other 
functional  characteristics)  (Vinogradov,  1978). 

Some  temperature  stratification  was  evident  during  the 
period  of  our  studies  in  the  0-8°N,  1 60- 1 80° E  rectangle  of  the 
equatorial  Pacific.  The  water  temperature  and  dissolved  oxygen 
content  remained  virtually  constant  down  to  a  depth  of  150  m. 
The  parameters  in  question  declined  rapidly  below  this  level. 
however,  which  necessarily  affected  the  formation  and 
distribution  of  microbiocoenoses.  Results  of  analyses 
(Figs.  1-3)  indicate  that  bacterioplankton  counts  and  biomass 
in  the  0-100-m  layer  varied  within  fairly  broad  limits.  The 
highest  bacterial  population  density  was  noted  at  Station  1 16, 
where  the  average  total  count  and  biomass  were 
591  x  103  cells/ml '  and  13.29  ug  C  V  d'1,  respectively.  The 
lowest  bacterioplankton  concentration  was  noted  at 
Station  118,  where  the  average  total  bacteria  count  was 
199  x  103  cells/ml1  and  the  biomass  4.48  ug  C  V  d  '.  The 
average  values  of  the  total  bacteria  count  and  biomass  in 


207 


the  0-100-m  layer  of  the  equatorial  Pacific  were 
360  x  103  cells/ml1  and  8.10  ug  C  1  '  d  ',  respectively.  Such  a 
level  of  development  of  bacterioplankton  and  its  biomass  is 
typical  of  the  bacterial  population  density  in  the  euphotic  zone 
with  background  upwelling  (Sorokin,  1978).  According  to 
data  reported  in  the  literature,  the  principal  bacterioplankton 
count  and  biomass  maxima  in  stratified  tropical  waters  are 
usually  situated  at  the  upper  boundary  of  the  thermocline.  The 
formation  of  the  microbiocoenosis  in  this  zone  is  attributable  to 
the  arrival  of  biogenic  substances  from  lower  layers,  to  the 
stable  existence  of  the  phytoplankton  population  in  the  euphotic 
layer,  and  to  the  stable  existence  of  the  phytoplankton  population 
in  the  euphotic  layer.  This  in  turn  ensures  that  the 
bacterioplankton  receives  a  steady  and  readily  assimilable 
supply  of  organic  matter  (Sorokin,  1971b,  1982). 

According  to  our  observations,  the  vertical  distribution  of 
microflora  (Figs.  1-3)  included  several  regularly  observed 
maxima  occasioned  by  the  delivery  of  labile  organic  matter  to 
the  zone  of  maximum  phytoplankton  synthesis.  These  lay  at 
15-25  m  for  Stations  115-117,  at  the  upper  boundary  of  the 
thermocline  (100-250  m).  and  at  a  depth  of  1.000-1.500  m 
(Stations  118-120)  (i.e.,  at  the  boundary  of  mixing  of  the 
Antarctic  waters). 

The  principal  bacterioplankton  concentration  maximum 
lay  at  a  depth  of  100  m.  The  microflora  counts  and  biomass 
were,  on  the  average,  1 .3  times  the  corresponding  values  for  the 
euphotic  zone.  The  level  of  microbiocoenosis  development  in 
deeper  waters  (at  depths  of  1,000-2,000  m)  was  lower.  The 
total  bacterioplankton  counts  and  biomass  value  here  turned 
out  to  be  lower  than  at  the  upper  boundary  of  the  thermocline 
by  a  factor  of  1.5.  The  constraints  limiting  microfloral 
development  in  these  deeper  waters  were  very  probably  the 
lower  temperature  and  high  pressure. 

There  was  a  clearcut  tendency  for  the  bacterial  population 
density  in  the  0.5-250-m  layer  to  decrease  in  the  east-to-west 
direction.  Thus,  the  bacterioplankton  counts  and  biomass  at 
Stations  115  and  116,  situated  in  the  eastern  part  of  the 
equatorial  zone,  were,  on  the  average,  twice  as  high  as  at 
Station  1 20.  lying  to  the  west  of  them.  This  observation  was  in 
keeping  with  the  declining  intensity  of  upwelling  from  east  to 
west  (Vinogradov.  1978). 

Thus,  total  bacterioplankton  counts  and  biomass  in  the 
waters  of  the  equatorial  Pacific,  which  have  suffered  less  of  an 
impact  from  human  activities  that  other  parts  of  the  Ocean,  are 
fully  comparable  with  those  observed  for  oligotrophic  and 
mesotrophic  waters. 

As  in  the  quantitative  parameters,  the  functional 
characteristics  undergo  considerable  change  as  one  moves 
from  east  to  west.  Data  obtained  in  the  course  of  the  present 
study  made  possible  some  quantitative  assessments  of  certain 
functional  characteristics  of  microbiocoenoses.  such  as 
microfloral  activity,  bacterial  biomass  production  rate,  and  the 
rate  of  degradation  of  organic  matter  in  the  equatorial  Pacific. 

Analysis  of  the  results  (Figs.  1—1)  shows  that  microfloral 
activity  in  the  0- 1 00-m  layer  in  the  equatorial  zone  varied  over 
a  broad  range  and  had  a  tendency  to  increase  in  the  east-to-west 
direction  despite  the  gradual  diminution  of  bacterial  population 


1   T    ■    '   ■  '   '   ' 

10 

Li_—— 

."*     "        '-  . 

\ 

25 

•     3 

♦    2 

'J 

.. — *  —  * 

-x— J—  « "■ 

£    45 

* 

♦ 

Q 

"*^i            * 

100 

m** 

■ > 

* • 

250 

T— -—"*'"* 

'    ? 

•      •V"^ 

1000 

■f 

1500 

<    , 

• 

~~'~"~i* . 

Station  115 


0 

2 

4 

>: 

e         it 

0 

025 

' 

0  75                   1 

0.25  0  5  075 


X-..' 


,y 


Figs.  1-3.  Vertical  distribution  of:  ( 1 )  water  temperature  in  °C;  (2)  dissolved 
oxygen  in  mg/l  (3)  total  bacteria  count  in  millions  of  cells/ml:  and 
(4) CO.  assimilation  by  bacteria  in  darkness.  ingCI  '  d  '.  All  data 
refer  to  the  equatorial  Pacific. 

density.  Thus,  the  values  for  the  amount  of  CO,  assimilated  by 
bacteria  per  day  under  conditions  of  darkness  averaged  1 .5-2.0 
times  higher  for  Stations  1 19  and  120  than  for  the  more  easterly 
Stations  115-116.  Both  bacterial  biomass  production  and 
organic  matter  degradation  also  increased.  Whereas  the  bacterial 
production  values  in  the  0-100-m  layer  at  Stations  1  15  and 
1  Id  averaged  15.2  and  16.6  (.tg  C  1  '  d"\  the  corresponding 
values  at  Stations  I  19  and  I  20  were  25.5  and  32.5  ng  C  1  '  d  '. 
The  respiratory  uptake  of  oxygen  by  microorganisms  in  the 
western  area  was  virtually  double.  The  rate  of  organic  mailer 
degradation  increased  from  78.7  HgC  l'1  d'1  at  Station  1 16  to 


208 


in  0-100  m  layer 


Station  115  Station  1 16  Siaiton  H7  Siaiion  1 18         SlMion  1 19  StMion  120 


.U 


n  h    _Q 


Suiiiin  1 15  Sluiion  I  Ift  Station  1 17  Suihon  I IH  Suimn  1 19  SlMion  120 


in  500-2.000  m  layer 


D 


Sluiion  I  IK  Suimn  ll>) 

I     I    BjLlcnjI  priwluumn 
Klug  C/l/duy      [v]]   Orgunn  nulla  dcgrjduiii] 


Fig.  4.    Bacterial  production  and  organic-matter  degradation  in  the  equatorial 
Pacific. 

104.4  jag  C  1  '  d  '  at  Station  1 19.  The  average  rate  of  bacterial 
organic  matter  degradation  in  the0-100-m  layer  in  this  part  of 
the  Pacific  equaled  75.5  ug  C  1  '  d  '.  The  P/B  coefficient  for 
microflora  in  the  0-100-m  layer  averaged  2.9,  which  was 
somewhat  higher  than  the  value  previously  obtained  by  Sorokin 
(1973).  The  average  value  of  the  P/D  coefficient  was  0.31. 

Maximum  microfloral  activity  in  the  0-100-m  layer 
occurred  at  a  depth  of  25  m.  The  rate  of  assimilation  in  darkness 
here  attained  a  level  typical  of  mesotrophic  waters,  averaging 
1.94  ugC  I'd'.  The  respiratory  oxygen  uptake  by  microflora 
also  showed  peak  values,  averaging  0.28  mg/1 — a  finding  that 
is  in  good  agreement  with  that  of  Sorokin  ( 1973).  The  rate  of 
bacterial  degradation  of  organic  matter  in  the  euphotic  zone 
reached  maximum  levels  on  the  order  of  103.9  ug  C  1  '  d  ' 
(Fig.  4). 

The  activity  of  microflora  in  the  100-250-m  layer  was 
somewhat  lower  compared  with  the  euphotic  zone.  The  rate  of 
CO,  assimilation  in  darkness  averaged  1.10  |ig  C  1'  d'. 
Bacterial  biomass  production  was  lower  than  in  the  top  layer  by 
an  average  factor  of  1.2.  The  bacterial  degradation  rate 
averaged  58.0  Ug  C  1  '  d  '.  The  P/B  coefficient  was  2.2,  the 
P/D  coefficient,  0.3 1 . 

Bacterial  activity  diminished  sharply  at  depths  exceeding 
250  m.  The  rate  of  bacterial  biomass  production  in  the 
500-2, 000-m  layer  was.  on  the  average,  almost  five 
times  lower  compared  with  the  upper  layers  of  the  water 
column,  ranging  from  2.5  to  5.5  |lg  C  1  '  d  '  and  averaging 
4.2  ug  C  1 '  d "'.  The  bacterial  degradation  rate  decreased  more 
than  fivefold  compared  with  that  of  the  euphotic  zone.  This 
decreased  rate  of  degradation  was  clearly  attributable  to  lower 
temperatures.  The  P/B  coefficient  in  the  500-2,000-m  layer 
was  0.7.  The  water  column  at  500-2,000  m  was  found  to 
include  two  layers  of  heightened  activity,  one  at  1,000  m,  the 
other  at  2,000  m.  However,  bacterial  production  and  degradation 
rates  in  these  maximum-activity  layers  did  not  attain  the 
average  values  characteristic  of  the  top  layer. 

The  next  transect  lay  along  10°N  in  the  western  Pacific 
(Frontispiece).  The  waters  in  this  area  exhibited  lower 
productivity  as  compared  with  those  of  the  equatorial  portion 
of  the  central  Pacific.     The  level  of  development  of 


microbiocoenoses  at  most  of  the  stations  corresponded  to  the 
upper  limit  of  productivity  for  oligotrophic  waters.  The  bacterial 
population  density  in  the  0-100-m  layer  ranged  from  129  to 
545  x  101  cells/ml1  (Figs.  5-7).  The  highest  bacterioplankton 
concentration  occurred  at  Station  123,  where  the  average  count 
and  biomass  reached  387  x  10-'  cells/ml '  and  8.7  ug  C  1 '  d '. 
The  highest  microfloral  activity  was  observed  at  Station  121, 
where  the  rate  of  CO,  assimilation  by  bacterioplankton  averaged 
1.76  Ug  C  1  '  d "',  which  corresponds  to  the  upper  limit  for 
oligotrophic  waters.  The  lowest  microfloral  activity  was  noted 
at  Station  122.  The  daily  rate  of  CO,  assimilation  in  darkness 
here  was  3.4  times  less  than  at  the  preceding  station. 

Bacterial  biomass  production  in  the  0- 1 00-m  layer  ranged 
from  2.1  to  52  ug  C  1  '  d  '  (Fig.  8).  The  oxygen  uptake  due  to 
bacterioplankton  respiration  averaged  0.12  mg/1.  The  rate 
of  organic  matter  degradation  by  bacteria  lay  in  the 
27-94-ug  C  1'  d  '  range,  with  an  average  value  of 
47  ug  C  1  '  d  '.  The  P/B  coefficient  was  2.3. 

The  portion  of  the  water  column  lying  below  the 
thermocline  (150-500  m)  exhibited  relatively  low  bacterial 
population  levels.  The  total  bacteria  counts  here  ranged  from 
109  to  492  x  10'  cells/ml',  the  biomass  from  3.9  to 
7.7  ug  C  1  '  d "'.  The  mean  bacteria  count  and  biomass  for  the 
150-500-m  layer  turned  out  to  be  237  x  10-  cells/ml' 
and  5.3  Ug  C  1'  d  ',  respectively.  The  microfloral  activity 
was  somewhat  lower  than  in  the  supernatant  100  m  of  the 
water  column.  The  rate  of  CO,  assimilation  by  bacteria  in 
darkness  ranged  from  0.12  to  1.36  ug  C  1'  d\  averaging 
0.62  ug  C 1  '  d  ' .  The  most  intense  microfloral  activity  occurred 
at  Station  125,  where  the  mean  CO,  assimilation  rate  reached 
0.78  ug  C 1  '  d  ' .  The  lowest  rate  of  0.47  ug  C 1 '  d  '  corresponded 
to  Station  122. 

The  bacterial  biomass  production  rate  turned  out  to  be  1 .5 
times  lower  than  in  the  0-100-m  layer.  Oxygen  uptake  due  to 
bacterioplankton  respiration  in  the  150-500-m  layer  averaged 
0.08  mg/1,  indicating  a  relatively  low  rate  of  degradation.  The 
degradation  rate  OB  ranged  from  25  to  42  ug  C  1'  d  '.  with  an 
average  value  of  33  ug  C  1 '  d  '. 

A  trend  towards  increased  bacterial  population  densities 
was  noted  in  the  deeper  ( 1 .000-2,000  m)  portion  of  the  water 
column.  For  example,  the  total  bacteria  counts  at  2,000  m 
for  Stations  1 2 1  and  1 22  were  much  higher  than  further  up 
the  water  column.  Some  increase  in  bacterioplankton 
concentrations  was  likewise  noted  at  1,500  m  at  Stations  123 
and  125.  The  average  total  bacterial  count  and  biomass  for 
the  1,000-2,000  m  layer  was  281  x  10'  cells/ml'  and 
6.3  ug  C  I  '  d  '.  respectively.  These  values  were  quite  closely 
comparable  with  the  data  for  the  0-100-m  layer. 

The  results  showed  that  microfloral  activity  in  the 
deeper  portions  of  the  water  column  was  suppressed  by 
low  temperatures  and  high  pressures.  The  rates  of  CO, 
assimilation  by  bacteria  in  darkness  for  the  1 ,000-2,000-m 
layer  ranged  from  0.11  to  0.42  ug  C  1'  d ',  averaging 
0.22  ug  C  1  '  d  '.  Bacterial  biomass  production  was,  on  the 
average.  2.8  times  lower  than  in  the  150-500-m  layer. 
Oxygen  uptake  due  to  bacterioplankton  respiration  averaged 
0.03  mg/1.  The  rate  of  degradation  of  organic  matter  was 
minimal,  the  average  value  for  the  layer  being  12  ug  C  1  '  d  '. 
The  P/B  coefficient  was  0.5. 


209 


0 

2 

. 

6 

8 

11 

) 

025 

15 

0  75 

1( 

p 

10 

ZS 

40 

5 

0 

2 

4 

6 

6                10 

0 

025 

0  5 

0  75                   t 

Q 

0  25 

05 

C 

"5 

1  0 

'   1 

10 

3 

k 

t    2 

4   « 

xl 

25 

• 

t 

» 

45 

E 

• 

4 

•• 

t 
n 

• 

* 

// 

100 

* 

* 

250 

*' 

^ 

500 

i  D00 

» 

• 

•       / 

Slanon  12: 

2000 

*  I 

. 

i 

24  30 


2 

4 

6 

6                 U 

0 

0  25 

05 

0  7S                  1 

0  25  0  5 


1500 
2000 


0                 0  25 

0  5                0  75                 1 

J  ! 

*"■        i 

• 

3    . 

> 

/  i 

..   . 

' 

/ 

. 

/ 

■ 

^      *         f 

,'•  ")  ) 

.    .■-" 

A      '*• 

Slatwn  122 

/    X 

t  '       ' 

i     •         ; 

0  25  OS 


0  25  0  5 


Figs  5-7.  Vertical  distribution  of:  1 1 1  water  temperature  in  C';(2)dissolved 
oxygen  in  mg/1  (3)  total  bacteria  count  in  millions  of  cells/ml;  and 
(4)  CO  assimilation  h>  bacteria  in  darkness,  in  g  C  1'  d'1.  All 
daia  applj  to  the  western  Pacific. 

The  bacterioplankton  distribution  over  the  water  column 
in  the  western  Pacific  exhibited  some  temperature  stratification, 
with  several  bacterial  population  and  acti\  it)  maxima  present 
(Figs.  5-7).  Three  bacterioplankton  concentration  peaks  were 
quite  clearly  in  evidence:  the  first  one  lay  below  the  /one  of 
maximum  phytoplanklon  synthesis  at  a  depth  of  45  m.  the 
second  above  the  upper  boundary  of  the  thermoeline  at  a  depth 
of  100  ill.  and  the  third  at  1.500  m.  Elevated  microfloral 
acti\  it}  was  noted  in  the  euphotic  /one  (10   15  ml.  above  the 


I     nl     ml     nl 


mil  iimi  m  layei 


Station  121       Station  122        Station  123         Station  124      Station  125      Station  126 


JL      nl         n   I  rn  I 


Station  121      Station  122       Station  123        Station  124      Station  1 25 


■  to  in  layei 


in  l.000-2.(HMi,n  layei 


Station  121       Station  122        Station  123        Station  124       Station  125 

1     I    Bacterial  production 


D.0, 


Fig.  8     Bacterial  production  and  organic-matter  degradation  in  the  western 
Pacific. 

thermoeline.  and  at  a  temperature  drop  boundary.  This  behax  ior 
of  bacterioplankton  distribution  and  activity  over  the  water 
column  was  closely  related  to  water  dynamics  and  was  typical 
of  the  oligotrophic  waters  of  the  tropical  oceans. 

The  next  series  of  studies  was  conducted  in  the  South 
China  Sea.  whose  waters  are  more  polluted  than  those  of  the 
central  Pacific.  Analyses  of  total  biomass.  bacterioplankton 
production,  and  bacterial  degradation  were  performed  at  five 
stations.  The  results  of  the  measurements  are  presented 
in  Figs.  9-11.  These  show  that  the  bacterioplankton  count 
in  the  euphotic  layer  (0-50  m)  ranged  from  176  to 
61  1  x  10'  cells/ml  '.  The  highest  bacterial  population  densities 
were  noted  for  Stations  1 30  and  131.  situated  in  coastal  waters: 
the  lowest  values  were  obtained  at  pelagically  situated 
Station  127.  The  bacterioplankton  count  at  certain  levels  of 
the  water  column  attained  611  x  10'  cells  ml'.  The 
average  bacterioplankton  count  in  this  area  equaled 
354  x  10' cells/ml  :. 

The  bacterioplankton  biomass  varied  over  a  broad  range 
of  values  from  3.16  to  11.81  (.tgCl'd1.  Data  for  the  0-50-m 
layer  averaged  for  individual  stations  yielded  values  from  6.67 
to  9. 1 6  jug  C I  '  d  ' .  Mean  data  for  bacterioplankton  biomass  and 
counts  for  the  euphotic  /one  place  the  investigated  portions  of 
the  South  China  Sea  in  the  oligotrophic  category. 

Low  bacterioplankton  counts  notwithstanding,  microflora] 
activity  was  relatively  high.  Thus,  the  rate  of  CO.  assimilation 
by  bacteria  in  darkness  ranged  from  0.52  to  4.07  (ig  C  1  d  '. 
averaging  1.60  p.g  C  1'  d  '  for  all  the  areas  studied. 
Bacterioplankton  production  for  individual  stations 
ranged  from  1 2.8  to  39.7  p.g  C  1 '  d  '  (Fig.  1 1 ).  The  value  for 
the  entirety  of  the  area  investigated  was  26.6  |ig  C  1  '  d  '. 

The  rates  of  bacterioplankton  respiration  in  the  0-50-m 
layer  calculated  as  averages  for  particular  stations  ranged 
from  0.11  to  0.34  mg  O,  1'  d  '.  The  range  of  bacterial 
respiration  rates  for  individual  samples  ranged  from  0.07  to 
0.58  mg  O,  I'd'.  The  maximum  bacterioplankton  respiration 
rate  was  observed  at  Station  1 30.  the  minimum  at  Station  1 29. 
The  average  daily  oxygen  uptake  by  bacterioplankton  in  the 
area  was  0.23  mg/1  ' .  which  w as  in  good  agreement  with  values 
calculated  from  experimental  data  on  the  respiration  of  the 
plankton  community  as  a  whole. 


210 


0 

6 

12 

16 

24              3C 

0 

2 

4 

6 

e          ic 

0 

0.25 

05 

0  75               1. 

E  10 

Q 

Q25 

45 


1 


0 

6 

12 

'8  Stattor2427 

30 

0 

2 

4 

6             8 

10 

0 

025 

05 

075 

1.0 

0 

2 

4 

6 

8                IC 

0 

0  25 

05 

075               1. 

"V> 


,/■' 


/ 


Figs.  9-10. 


Vertical  distribution  of:  ( 1  )watertemperaturein°C;(2)dissolved 
oxygen  in  mg/1:  (3)  total  bacteria  count  in  millions  of  cells/ml; 
and  (4)  CO,  assimilation  by  bacteria  in  darkness,  in  g  C  1  '  d  '. 
All  data  apply  to  the  South  China  Sea. 


Total  bacterial  degradation  in  the  water  column  at  individual 
stations  ranged  from  41  to  127  (ig  C  1 '  d  '.  The  average  for  a 
whole  of  the  area  studied  was  86  U.  C  1  '  d"1. 

The  vertical  distribution  of  bacterioplankton  over  the 
water  column  within  the  euphotic  zone  included  a  clearly 
evident  peak  at  a  depth  of  1 0  m  (Figs.  9, 1 0).  The  mean  bacterial 
density  and  biomass  in  this  layer  were  450  x  10'  cells/ml '  and 
10.1  u.g  C  1 '  d "',  respectively.  Both  counts  and  biomass  then 
decreased  with  depth. 

Microfloral  activity  varied  considerably  over  the  water 
column.  Two  microfloral  activity  peaks  were  observed  at 
several  stations:  one  lay  at  a  depth  of  10  m,  the  other  at  or  near 
the  sea  bottom.  Enhanced  production-degradation  activity 
was  likewise  noted  at  the  corresponding  depths.  Bacterial 
biomass  production  in  the  peak-activity  layers  was  2.5  times 
the  bacterial  production  obtained  for  the  entire  sea  area  studied. 
The  degradation  rate  OB  in  the  bottom  layer  was  3.5  times  that 
noted  for  the  surface  layer. 

Discussion 

Particular  portions  of  the  Pacific  Ocean  exhibited  differing 
levels  of  microbiocoenosis  development.  The  equatorial  Pacific 
and  South  China  Sea  areas  are  closely  similar  with  respect  to 
bacterioplankton  and  biomass  parameters  in  their  euphotic 
zones.  On  the  other  hand,  the  level  of  development  of  the 
bacterial  population  in  the  western  Pacific  was  found  to  be 
much  lower.  The  South  China  Sea  exhibited  relatively  high 
microfloral  activity.  Values  characterizing  bacterial  production 
and  organic  matter  degradation  in  the  sea  were  similar  to  those 
reported  for  the  mesotrophic  waters  of  the  tropical  ocean.  The 
level  of  production-degradation  processes  in  the  western  Pacific 
was  almost  half  of  that  in  both  the  equatorial  ocean  and  the 
South  China  Sea  and  corresponded  to  values  characteristic  of 
oligotrophic  waters. 


n 


n 


in  0-55  m  layer 


Station  126      Station  127 


Station  128 


Station  129        Station  130 


Station  131 


Scale: 


I    I   Bacterial  production 
10  Ug  c/l/day   EH  Organic  matter  degradation 


Fig.  1 1 .  Bacterial  production  and  organic-matter  degradation  in  the  South  China  Sea. 

211 


3.2     A  Study  of  Primary  Phytoplankton 
Production 

MIKHAEL  N.  KORSAK 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology,  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  and  Academy  of  Sciences,  Moscow,  USSR 


Introduction 

The  study  of  the  rate  of  formation  of  new  organic  matter 
by  phytoplankton  photosynthesis  in  the  tropical  Pacific  reported 
in  the  present  paper  was  carried  out  during  the  First  Joint 
US-USSR  Central  Pacific  Expedition  aboard  the  R/V  Akademik 
Korolev  in  1988.  The  ocean  areas  investigated  included 
portions  of  the  central  and  western  Pacific,  which  had  received 
little  previous  attention.  Primary  production  in  the  area  of  the 
first  transect,  beginning  near  Caroline  Atoll  and  ending  at 
Tarawa  Island  (Republic  of  Kiribati),  ranges  from  values 
characteristic  of  oligotrophic  parts  of  the  ocean 
(100  mg  C/nr/day  and  lower)  to  values  corresponding  in 
mesotrophic  areas  of  the  Pacific  (25  mg  c/nr/day)  (Sorokin, 
1976). 

The  central  portion  of  the  tropical  Pacific  (stations  of  the 
second  transect)  may  be  characterized  as  an  oligotrophic 
productivity  zone  where  a  major  role  in  primary  production 
enhancement  is  played  by  synoptic  phenomena  such  as  cyclones, 
tornadoes,  waterspouts,  etcetera  (Sorokin,  1976).  Situated  in 
the  open  portion  of  the  northern  tropical  Pacific  (i.e.,  within  the 
northern  tradewind  zone),  the  second  transect  studied  showed 
a  primary  rate  of  organic  matter  production  by  phytoplankton 
of  about  1 00  mgC/m7day  (Sorokin,  1976).  The  relatively  low 
rales  of  primary  production  in  this  part  of  the  Pacific  are 
attributable  largely  to  the  deficiency  of  biogenic  elements  in 
the  photosynthetic  layer.  These  low  concentrations  are  in  turn 
due  to  anticyclonic  circulation,  which  produces  downwelling 
of  nitrogen-  and  phosphorus-poor  surface  waters.  It  is  the 
resulting  low  nitrogen  and  phosphorus  levels  in  the 
photosynthetic  layer  that  limit  photosynthesis  rates  in  the 
phytoplankton  community. 

Despite  the  absence  of  significant  seasonal  variations  in 
illumination  and  water  temperature  in  the  tropical  ocean, 
considerable  seasonal  changes  of  photosynthesis  rates  have 
been  reported  in  spring  and  autumn  (Sorokin,  1976). 

Materials  and  Methods 

Studies  al  Stations  1  14-120  in  the  central  tropical  Pacific 
were  conducted  from  27  September  to  7  October  1988.  The 
work  al  Stations  121-126  along  the  Marianas  transect  was 
performed  from  L  6  October  to  2]  October.  Primary  production 
was  determined  by  means  of  a  radiocarbon  version  of  the  "jars 
method"  proposed  by  Sorokin  (Sorokin  el  al.,  1983).  Work  al 
each  station  included  measurements  of  photosynthesis  in  a 
surface-water  sample  (Cps)  as  well  as  determinations  of 
photosynthesis  in  the  water  layer  as  a  function  of  phytoplankton 
distribution  over  (he  water  column  (the  coefficients  K,). 


The  light  curves  (the  coefficients  K,)  were  determined  at  one 
station  in  each  transect.  The  sample  incubation  was  usually  8- 
10  h,  beginning  in  the  morning.  The  radioactivity  of  filters  with 
l4C-labeled  phytoplankton  and  of  the  working  NaHl4CO, 
solutions  was  measured  using  a  Nuclear  Chicago  "Mark  2" 
scintillation  counter.  Sample  radioactivities  were  counted 
using  liquid  scintillator  cocktails  of  previously  described 
composition  (Sorokin,  1976;  Sorokin  et  al.,  1983). 

Primary  production  was  calculated  using  the  standard 
formula,  with  a  factor  of  1.5  to  correct  for  l4C  loss  due  to 
phytoplankton  sample  filtering  (Sorokin,  1976).  All 
determinations  of  primary  production  were  carried  out  in 
triplicate.  The  extent  of  the  photosynthesis  zone  was  taken  to 
equal  the  white-disk  transparency  multiplied  by  three.  Samples 
for  determining  phytoplankton  production  were  taken  using 
5-1  Niskin  bottles  at  depths  of  0.5:  10;  15;  25;  45;  70,  and 
100m. 

Results 

The  vertical  structure  of  phytoplankton  communities  in 
high-transparency  tropical  ocean  waters  is  characterized  by 
several  phytoplankton  growth  peaks  or  maxima  in  the  euphoric 
zone,  whose  depth  sometimes  exceeds  100  m.  Two  layers  with 
elevated  phytoplankton  concentrations  are  usually  in  evidence. 
The  first  of  these  occurs  at  a  depth  of  1 0-30  m  and  is  associated 
with  a  photosynthesis-optimal  light  zone;  the  second  lies  at 
depths  of  70-90  m  and  is  related  to  heightened  biogenic 
element  levels  in  (he  vicinity  of  the  pycnocline  (Sorokin. 
1 976).  As  is  evident  from  Table  1 ,  the  depth  of  the  photosynthesis 
layer  at  all  stations  of  both  transects  was  usualh  slightly  in 
excess  of  100  m.  As  a  rule,  only  a  single  photosynthesis  peak 
was  observed  (the  one  in  the  15-25-m  depth  range),  since  the 
pycnocline  lay  below  the  photosynthesis  layer  boundary  (see 
Table  1 ).  However,  Stations  1 22  and  1 26  did  exhibit  a  second 
relatively  small  primary  production  peak  at  70  m  (Table  1). 
Primary  production  values  for  the  topmost  levels  of  the  water 
column  were  usually  markedly  lower  than  at  depths  of 
10-15  m.  which  was  probably  due  to  photic  inhibition  of 
photosynthesis  by  the  high-intensity  incident  light.  Stratification 
of  water  masses  o\  er  the  w  ater  column  had  no  significant  effect 
on  primary  organic-matter  production  by  phytoplankton. 
inasmuch  as  the  top  100  m  of  the  water  column  was 
homothermal.  Thus,  the  water  temperature  in  the  top  100  mof 
the  water  column  at  stations  of  both  transects  varied  within  just 
1-2°C.  Salinity  in  the  same  laser  varied  within  the  same 
narrow  limits,  so  that  the  primary  production  level  at  various 
depths  depended  largely  upon  light  intensity,  amount  of 
phytoplankton  present,  and  biogenic-element  availability. 


212 


The  local  primary  production  peaks  occurring  at  a  depth  of 
70  m  at  Stations  1 22  and  1 26  were  probably  due  to  the  elevated 
levels  of  biogenic  elements  present  there. 

The  values  obtained  for  primary  production  of  organic 
matter  by  phytoplankton  for  the  whole  of  the  photosynthetic 
zone  ranged  from  70  to  140  mg  C/nr/day  (see  Table  1 ).  The 
maximum  phytoplankton  production  ( 140  mg  C/nr/day)  was 
observed  at  Station  116;  minimum  production 
( 70  mg  C/nr/day)  occurred  at  Station  120  (Table  1).  The  total 
average  levels  of  phytoplankton  productivity  in  this  part  of  the 
Pacific  during  the  period  of  our  studies  was  in  line  with  the 
higher  range  of  primary  phytoplankton  production  values 
typical  of  oligotrophic  zones  of  the  World  Ocean  (i.e.,  about 
101  mg  C/nr/day). 

For  stations  of  the  second  transect,  situated  to  the  northwest 
of  the  first  at  about  8°N,  the  range  of  variation  of  primary 
production  rates  (90-338  mg  C/nr/day)  exceeded  the  range  of 
values  for  Stations  1 14-120  (Table  1).  The  mean  primary 
production  at  Stations  121-126  corresponded  to  the  lower 
range  of  productivity  rates  for  oligomesotrophic  zones  of  the 
World  Ocean  (i.e..  about  172  mg  C/nr7day)  (Table  1 ). 

Comparing  the  primary  organic-matter  production  values 
measured   during  the  1988  expedition  with  those  obtained 


during  the  1984  expedition,  which  covered  roughly  the  same 
parts  of  the  Pacific,  we  note  that  both  primary  productivity  and 
the  range  of  variation  of  primary  production  rates  were  greater 
in  1984.  The  rates  of  primary  production  of  organic  matter  by 
phytoplankton  over  the  Marianas  transect  in  late  July-early 
August  1984  ranged  from  1 00  mg  C/nr/day  to  1.16gC/nr7day, 
the  mean  value  being  about  400  mg  C/nr/day .  The  highest 
primary  production  values  for  phytoplankton  occurred  at  the 
westernmost  stations  of  the  transect.  The  rather  high  primary 
production  rates  in  this  part  of  the  ocean  in  1 984  were  probably 
due  to  the  seasonal  arrival  of  waters  rich  in  biogenic  elements 
that  originated  in  the  equatorial  divergence  area  to  the  south  of 
the  study  area. 

Phytoplankton  productivity  rates  for  the  Marianas  transect 
in  1988  were  somewhat  lower  than  those  recorded  in  1984. 
The  differences  can  probably  be  attributed  to  fluctuations  in 
the  arrival  of  waters  from  the  equatorial  divergence  region. 
On  the  whole,  the  level  of  primary  production  of  organic 
matter  in  the  central  tropical  Pacific  was  in  keeping  with 
expectations  based  on  previous  studies  ( Sorokin,  1 976 )  and  on 
the  findings  of  the  1 984  expedition,  corresponding  more  or  less 
to  the  level  associated  with  oligomesotrophic  zones  of  the 
World  Ocean. 


TABLE  1 

Primary  production  (mg  C/nr/day)  at  different  stations 
in  the  central  Pacific. 


Depth 

Station  Number 

(m)           114 

1  15 

1  16 

119 

120 

121            122 

123 

124 

125 

126 

0.5            2.9 

1.7 

2.3 

1.2 

0.42 

3.5             1 .9 

2.9 

0.40 

1.2 

1.4 

10              1.7 

2.3 

2.5 

1.8 

1.2 

5.2            5.6 

2.7 

0.48 

0.53 

3.0 

15             1.5 

2.6 

5.6 

3.6 

1.6 

7.2             10.5 

6.0 

2.7 

2.7 

4.5 

25             2.8 

1.1 

1.5 

2.1 

1.3 

1.7            7.8 

2.0 

3.4 

3.7 

2.7 

45             0.7 

0.6 

1.0 

1.6 

1.0 

0.74          1.3 

0.97 

0.45 

1.3 

0.6 

70             0.44 

0.32 

0.6 

0.58 

0.16 

0.74          2.3 

0.3 

0.3 

0.46 

0.7 

100           0.06 

0.02 

0.08 

0.14 

0.02 

0.21          0.13 

0.01 

0.00 

0.05 

0.0 

*  P,„2         80.5 

84.2 

14(1 

132 

70 

177           338 

143 

89 

125 

16'1 

*  P,„:  is  the  primary  produi 

:tion  for  the 

photosynthesis  1 

ayer  down  to  100  m  ( m 

g  C/m 

7day). 

3.3     Mesozooplankton 


TATIANA  A.  PAVLOVA  and  AUDREY  S.  KUL1KOV 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology,  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  and  Academy  of  Sciences,  Moscow,  USSR 


Materials  and  Methods 

The  materials  for  this  work  were  collected  in  the  eastern 
equatorial  region  of  the  Pacific  Ocean  at  seven  stations  ( Stations 
1 14- 120)  whose  coordinates  ranged  from  10°Sto  150°W,and 
0°S  to  178°W  (Fig.  1).  The  zooplankton  was  collected  in 
daylight  with  a  large  Juday  Net.  with  a  mesh  of  168  urn  and  a 


throat  diameter  of  37  cm.  from  the  0-50.  50-100,  and 
100-200-m  levels.  The  samples  were  fixed  with  a  40% 
solution  of  formaldehyde  and  were  processed  by  the  standard 
methods  (Korshenko,  1988:  Tsyban  et  al„  1988)  under  an 
MBS-9  binocular  microscope  in  a  Bogorov  chamber.  The 
sample  was  concentrated  and  poured  into  a  Petri  dish.  While 
it  was  being  examined  under  the  binocular  microscope,  the 


213 


180    W 


150'W 


a) 


Boundary  of 
0   Tradewind 
Current 


180  W  170' 


150' 

5' 

x|x  convergence 

o 


b) 


180    W  170' 


Fig.  I.  Character  of  currents  in  the  region  studied:  (a)  circulation  of  waters 
at  the  surface;  (h)  circulation  of  waters  at  a  depth  of  100  m;  and  (c) 
circulation  of  waters  at  a  depth  of  2(H)  m. 

largest  animals  ( over  2  mm  long )  were  washed  out  and  classified 
into  systematic  groups  using  a  biolam  R-7  microscope.  The 
residue  of  the  sample  was  diluted  1 0-20-fold,  depending  on  the 
concentration,  and  2-3  portions  of  10-20  ml  each  were  taken 
with  a  5-ml  plunger  pipet  for  counting.  On  the  basis  of  this  data, 
the  mesozooplankton  numbers  in  1  m1  and  under  1  m:  were 
calculated.  A  micrometer  eyepiece  was  used  to  determine  the 
body  length  of  representatives  of  each  species.  On  the  basis  of 
these  values  and  Chislenko's  nomograms  (Chislenko,  1968; 
Vinogradov  &  Shushkina,  1987),  the  biomass  of  each  species 
was  determined,  and  the  total  biomass  of  mesozooplankton  in 
I  in'  and  under  1  m  was  calculated.  Twenty  samples  were 
analyzed. 

Results  and  Discussion 

li  is  well  known  (Korshenko,  1988)  that  the  characteristics 
of  the  distribution  of  zooplankton  depend,  to  a  considerable 
degree,  on  the  hydrological  structure  of  the  water  masses. 
Figure  1  shows  a  diagram  of  the  currents  in  the  studied  region 
on  the  surface  and  at  depths  of  1 00  m  and  200  m.  The  dynamics 
of  the  water  masses  at  the  easternmost  station  near  Caroline 


Atoll  and  at  adjacent  Station  1 14  are  low;  no  major  currents 
pass  through  this  area.  The  depths  of  100  m  and  200  m  at 
stations  in  the  central  portion  of  the  region  are  characterized  by 
a  water  mass  transport  to  the  west.  The  w  ater  masses  of  the 
western  portion  of  the  section  (Stations  119  and  120)  are 
affected  by  the  surface  South  Tradew  ind  Current.  In  addition, 
at  the  westernmost  point  of  the  region  (Station  120).  an 
anticyclonic  equatorial  current  is  observed  (Gorshkov,  1974). 

The  heterogeneity  of  the  regional  water  structures  suggests 
a  nonuniform  horizontal  and  vertical  distribution  of  the 
mesozooplankton  as  well  as  its  qualitative  diversity.  As  is 
evident  from  Table  1 .  the  composition  of  the  mesozooplankton 
differed  qualitatively  at  different  points  of  the  section.  A  total 
of  about  1 80  forms  of  mesozooplankton  were  determined  as  a 
result  of  the  analysis  of  the  samples.  The  average  number  of 
species  for  a  station  ranged  from  75  to  139  and.  for  an 
individual  level,  from  39  to  84  (i.e.,  it  differed  by  a  factor  of 
two)  (Table  1;  Fig.  2).  The  smallest  number  of  species  was 
found  at  the  station  near  Caroline  Atoll:  at  the  0-50-m  and 
50-100-m  levels,  there  were  39  and  56  species,  respectively. 
The  number  of  species  increased  from  south  to  north  toward  the 
equator,  reaching  a  maximum  of  1 39  at  Station  17.  The  vertical 
structure  of  species  composition  also  varied.  In  the  majority  of 
the  cases,  the  number  of  species  increased  appreciably  with 
depth,  and  it  remained  practically  unchanged  only  at  the 
equator  (Fig.  2a). 

The  species  observed  in  the  waters  of  the  region  studied 
were  encountered  at  different  frequencies.  Four  gradations  of 
species  occurrence  were  distinguished:  rare,  under  1  sp/m'; 


Number  of  species 


2 

3     30 

40 

s|l 

60     70    80 

90    100 

Depih.  m. 

-.1  l!"  Ins 
V     \ 

l\ll5  \ 

HI? 

50- 

!\  \  \  / 

M4^\ 

sj?«     b        fl 

100 

1    I 

\l 

200  - 

^ 

Number  of  species 
140 


120     119     118     117     116     115      114        Sun.) 


I  ig   2.    Number  ol  meso/ooplankton  species:  (a)  at  an  individual  level;  and 
Ibl  average  for  the  station. 


low,  from  I  to  10  sp/m1;  normal,  from  k)  to  100  sp/m';  and 
massive  ,  >  100  sp/m3  (Table  1 ).  As  a  rule,  determined  forms 
of  mesozooplankton  were  found  at  the  same  frequency. 
However,  it  is  evident  from  Table  1  that,  in  many  cases,  the 
frequency  of  species  occurrence  increased  in  the  western 
portion  of  the  section.  The  number  of  massive  species  at  an 
individual  level  ranged  from  4  to  14.  The  maximum  number  of 
massive  species  ( 1 3-14)  was  recorded  in  the  western  portion  of 
the  section  at  the  equator;  the  minimum  number  was  recorded 
in  the  eastern  portion.  We  note  that  the  populations  of  only  2 1 
species  of  zooplankton  reached  numbers  above  100  sp/m1;  18 
consisted  of  the  order  Copepoda.  Among  other  taxonomic 
groups,  massive  concentrations  were  formed  by  Flassisagitta 
enflata,  Oikopleura  sp.  I,  Euphausia  similis  var.  "armata." 

Some  massive  species  reached  a  high  density  at  all  stations 
and  levels.  They  included  Clausocalanus  porgens,  Oithona 
spp.,  Oncaea  venusta,  Corycaeus  gibbulus,  Microsetella  rosea, 
and  Oikopleura  sp.  I.  Of  ihese,  the  most  numerous  species  was 
the  cyclopoid.  O.  venusta.  On  the  other  hand,  60  rare  species 
occurring  in  5-15%  of  the  samples  were  counted.  On  the 
whole,  the  lists,  of  planktonic  organisms  observed  in  equatorial 
waters  of  the  Pacific  Ocean  (Geinrikh,  1960;  Vinogradov  & 
Voronina,  1963;  Arashkevich,  1972;  Stepan'yants,  1977)  are 
similar  to  those  that  we  obtained  (Table  1 ). 

Mesozooplankton  species  composition  in  the  section  from 
Caroline  Atoll  to  the  equator  was  approximately  uniform,  from 
east  to  west  for  species  of  Cyclopoida,  Harpacticoida, 
Appendicularia,  and  Siphonophora,  as  well  as  for  the  minimal 
content  of  Euphausiacea  and  Chaetognatha(Fig.  3, Table  1).  In 
the  eastern  portion  of  the  region,  such  groups  as  Ostracoda, 
Mysidae,  and  Salpidae  were  practically  absent.  Of  the  13 
determined  Polychaeta,  only  two  species  were  detected  in  the 
region  near  Caroline  Atoll.  Some  species  of  Chaetognatha 
(i.e.,  Ferosagitta  ferox.  Pterosagitta  draco,  Parasagitta 
speticoela,  Sagitta  sp.,  Sagitta  pulchra)  found  in  the  western 
portion  of  the  region  were  absent  from  Station  1 14.  Although 
species  composition  at  the  eastern  stations  was  poor,  relative  to 
those  to  the  west,  some  species  were  found  there  that  were  not 
found  at  any  of  the  other  stations  (i.e.,  the  Far-neritic 
[Vinogradov  &  Voronina.  1963]  copepod  Undinula  vulgaris 
and  certain  siphonophores). 

In  the  western  section  of  the  region,  the  number  of  species 
of  Cyclopoida,  Harpacticoida,  Euphausiacea.  Amphiphoda, 
Calanoida,  and  Chaetognatha  increased  significantly, 
sometimes  severalfold,  in  comparison  with  the  eastern  section 
(Fig.  3).  As  one  moved  toward  the  equator,  from  Station  1 17. 
the  number  of  previously  undetected  deep-sea  species  of 
Calanoida  (Neocalanus  gracilis,  N.  robustion,  Bradycalanus 
sp.,  Rhincalanus  cornutus,  Bradyidus  armatus,  Euchirella 
amoena,  Pleuromamma  abdominalis,  P.  gracilis,  Haloptilis 
acutifrons,  H.  longicornis,  Candacia  longimana,  and 
Labidocera  detruncata)  increased  in  the  samples.  This  may 
have  been  due  to  a  more  intense  mixing  of  equatorial  waters  in 
the  region  of  their  increase  or  to  more  active  vertical  daily 
migrations  of  mesozooplankton  (Vinogradov  &  Voronina, 
1963).  The  western  section  was  also  much  richer  in  the  species 
composition  of  Cyclopoida:  previously  undetected  species  of 


Numbers,  sp./m 
2000   ■ 

1500  - 


a) 


1000  - 


500- 


120     119     118      117     116     115     114       Stations 


b) 


400 

300 

200- 

100- 


0 


— i 1 1 1  i 

120   119    118    117   116   115    114    Stations 


Fig.  3.    Horizontal  distribution  of  mesozooplankton  in  the  200  m  surface 
layer:  (a)  distribution  of  numbers;  and  (b)  distribution  of  biomass. 


Corycaeus  lautus,  C.  robustus,  and  six  species  of  the  genus 
Sapphirina,  Copilia  longistylis,  and  Pachysoma  dentatum 
were  present  in  the  samples.  The  Harpacticoida  group  in  the 
samples  near  Caroline  Atoll  was  represented  by  the  single 
species,  Microsetella  rosea.  The  new  species  of  Clytemnestra 
scutellata  and  Miracia  sp.,  from  deeper  waters,  appeared  in 
samples  from  the  western  stations.  In  contrast  to  the  eastern 
section,  where  Amphipoda  were  represented  by  species  in  the 
family  Hyperiidae,  to  the  west,  there  were  more  species  of 
Platyscelidae  and  Pronoidae.  Isolated  specimens  of  Ramosia 
sp.,  Vogtia  serrata,  and  Maresearsia  sphaera;  representatives 
of  the  Gerionidae  family;  larvae  of  cephalopod  mollusks;  and 
large  forms  of  Appendicularia  ( Oikopleura  sp.  II)  were  observed 
only  in  the  western  stations.  Thus,  moving  from  Caroline  Atoll 
to  the  equator,  the  diversity  and  abundance  of  mesozooplankton 
increased. 

Differences  in  species  composition  were  characteristic  not 
only  of  the  extreme  western  and  eastern  points  of  the  region:  a 
number  of  interesting  characteristics  were  also  discovered  at 
Station  117.  located  at  the  center  of  the  region.  All  the 
taxonomic  groups  were  represented  most  completely  in  the 
community  of  zooplankton  found  at  this  station.  For  example, 
of  30  species  of  Amphipoda,  22  were  found  at  Station  117.  and 
of  13  species  of  Polychaeta,  1 1  were  found.  Large  forms  of 
Tomopteris  sp..  Oikoleura  sp.  II,  a  single  specimen  of 
Nematoscelis  gracilis,  and  concentrations  of  large  Euphausia 
similis  var.  "armata"  and  tomopterids  were  also  found  in  the 
waters  of  Station  1 1 7. 


215 


TABLE  1 

Qualitative  composition  of  mesozooplankton. 

(Notation:  *-rare  species,  numbers  below  1  sp/m'; 

**-low-number  species,  numbers  from  1-10  sp/m'; 

**-regular  species,  numbers  from  10-100  sp/m3;  and 

:*-massive  species,  numbers  in  excess  of  100). 


14 


115 


116 


18 


119 


120 


1.  Foraminifera 
Radiolaria 

2.  Spongotrochus 

3.  Collosum  sp. 
Hydrosa 

4       Gerionidae  gen.  sp. 

5.  Liriope  tetraphylla 
Siphonophora 

6.  Agalma  sp. 

7.  Marrus  sp. 

8.  Ramosia  sp. 

9.  Vogtia  serrata 

1 0.  Maresearsia  sphaera 

1 1 .  Sulculeolaria  quadridentata 

12.  5.  quadrivalvis 

13.  Galetta  australis 

14.  Diphyes  bojani 

15.  D.  dispar 

1 6.  Lensia  achilles  baryi 

17.  L.  campanella 

18.  L.  multicristata 

1 9.  Lensia  spp. 

20.  Muggiaea  atlantica 

21.  Eudoxoides  mitra 

22.  E.  spiralis 

23.  Chelphyes  appendiculata 

24.  C.  contorta 

25.  Ceratocymba  leucartii 

26.  Abylopsis  eschschottsii 

27.  A.  tatrugona 

28.  Bassia  bassensis 

29.  A/>\7«  schmidti 

30.  Diphydae  gen.  sp. 
Polychaeta 

3 1 .  Alciopa  parasitica 

32.  Alciopidae  gen.  sp. 

33.  Krohnia  sp. 

34.  Rhynchonerella  sp. 

35.  Maupasia  sp. 

36.  Lopadorhynchus  appendicular 

37.  Pelagobia  logicirrata 

38.  Phillodocidae  gen.  sp. 
40.  Tomopteris  elegans 
41  Tomopteris  sp.  II 

42.  Travisiopsis  levinseni 

43.  T.  lobifera 

44.  Typhloscolecidae  gen.  sp. 
Mollusca 

45.  Cephalopoda  larvae 
Crustacea 

46.  Ostracoda:  Conchoecia  sp. 
Copcpoda 

47.  ( 'alanus  minor 

48.  (  .  pauper 

49.  Neocalanus  gracilis 

50.  /V.  robustior 

5  I .  Neocalanus  spp.  cop. 

52.  Undinula  darwinii 

53.  £/.  vulgaris 

54.  Calanus  spp.  cop. 

55.  Bradycalanus  sp. 

56.  Eucalanus  attenuates 

57.  £.  subcrassus 

58.  Rhincalanus  cornutus 


* 
** 

* 
* 

* 


** 

* 

* 


** 

* 
* 

* 
* 


* 
** 


** 

** 

* 

** 

** 

*** 

*** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

*** 

*** 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

*** 

*** 

** 

*** 

** 

*** 

*** 

* 

* 

** 

**# 

*** 

** 

** 

*** 
* 

*** 

* 

** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

* 

* 

** 
* 

** 

* 

* 
* 

216 


59.  Acrocalanus  gibber 

60.  A.  gracilis 

61.  A.  monachus 

62.  Calocalanus  pavo 

63.  Paracalanus  aculeatus 

64.  Mecynocera  calusi 

65.  Clausocalanus  arcuicornis 

66.  C  pergens 

67.  Pseudocalanus  minimis 

68.  Pseudocalanidae  gen.  sp. 

69.  Bradyidus  armatus 

70.  Euchirella  amoena 

71.  Aetidae  gen.  sp. 

72.  Euchaeta  marina 

73.  Scolecitricella  orientalis 

74.  Scoletrix  danae 

75.  Phaena  spinifera 

76.  Centropages  calaninus 

77.  C.  elongatus 

78.  C  gracilis 

79.  C.  longicornis 

80.  Centropages  spp.  cop. 

8 1 .  Pleuromamma  abdominalis 

82.  P.  gracifc 

83.  Lucicutia  flavicornis 

84.  Z..  oralis 

85.  Heterorhabdus  papilliger 

86.  Haloptilis  acutifrons 

87.  W.  longicornis 

88.  Candacia  catula 

89.  C  longimana 

90.  C.  paehydactyla 

91.  C  truncata 

92.  Labidocera  detruncata 

93.  Pontcllina  plumata 

94.  Arcatia  negligens 
Cyclopoida 

95.  Oithona  spp. 

96.  Oncaea  venusta 

97.  (9.  notopus 

98.  Corycaeus  agilis 

99.  C  asiaticus 

100.  C.  fO/H.V 

101 .  C  crassiuscidus 

102.  C.flaccus 

103.  C.gibbulus 

104.  C.japonieus 

105.  C.  /m/mv 

106.  C.  longistylis 

107.  C.  robust  us 

108.  C.  speciosus 

1 09.  Corycaeus  spp.  cop. 

1  10.  Sapphirina  auronitens 

111.  S.  gastrica 

112.  5.  intestinata 

1 13.  5.  metallina 

114.  5.  nigromaculata 

115.  5.  opalina 

116.  S.stellata 

117.  Sapphirina  spp.  cop. 

1 1 8.  Copilia  longistylis 

119.  C  mirabilis 

1 20.  C.  cpiadreta 

121.  Pachysoma  dentation 
I  22.  Nogagus  muraji 
Harpacticoida 

123.  Microsetella  rosea 

124.  Clytemnestra  scutellata 

125.  Miracia  sp. 

1 26.  Copepoda  nauplii 


TABLE  1  -  continued 

114  115  116 


** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

*** 

*** 

#**# 

** 

** 
** 
** 


17 


18 


* 

** 

** 

** 

* 

*** 

** 

**# 

** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

*** 

** 

*** 

** 

*** 

*** 

*** 

*** 

*** 

*** 

*** 

*** 

*** 

*** 

*** 

*** 

** 

*** 

*** 

**** 

* 

**** 

**** 

*  =t-  =fc 

**** 

*** 

**** 

* 

*** 

** 

** 


119 


** 
* 


** 

* 

** 

** 

* 

** 

** 

* 

*#* 

*** 

** 

** 


** 


120 


** 

** 

*** 

*** 

** 

** 

*** 

** 

*** 

**** 

**** 

*** 

** 

*** 

**** 

**** 

*** 

*** 

*** 

** 

*** 

*** 

** 

** 

** 

* 

** 

** 

** 

** 

* 

** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

* 

* 

* 

*** 

** 

* 

* 

** 

** 
* 


* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

* 

*** 

** 

** 

*** 

*** 

*** 

**** 

*** 

#*** 

*** 

**** 

**** 

*##* 

*** 

$;  %  %  ^ 
* 

*** 

**** 

* 

** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

** 

* 

* 

** 

* 

* 

* 


217 


TABLE  1     Continued 

114  115  llfi 


117 


118 


119 


120 


Mysidacea 

127.  Mysidae  yen.  sp.  larvae 

128.  Gammaridae  num. 
Amphipoda 


129. 

Vibilia  chuni 

130. 

Paraphronima  graciis 

131. 

Lestrigonus  shizongeneios 

132. 

L.  shoemakeri 

133. 

Hyperia  fabrei 

134. 

Hyperietta  stephenseni 

135. 

Phronima  atlantica 

136. 

P.  curvipes 

137. 

Phronimella  elongate 

138. 

Phrosina  semulunata 

139. 

Lycaeopsis  zamboangae 

140. 

Eupronoe  armatus 

141. 

E.  maculata 

142. 

E.  minuta 

143. 

Paralycaea  gracilis 

144. 

Parapronoe  parva 

145. 

Brachyscelus  crusculum 

146. 

Oxycephalic  longipes 

147. 

Leptocotis  tenuirostris 

148. 

Calamorhynchus  pellucidus 

149. 

Platyscelus  armatus 

150. 

PI.  ovoides 

151. 

Hemityphis  tenuimanus 

152. 

Paratyphis  parvus 

153. 

Paratyphis  sp. 

154. 

Amphithyrus  muratus 

155. 

Tetrathyrus  forcipatus 

Ruphausiacea 

156. 

Euphausia  similis  var.  armata 

157. 

Euphausia  spp.  furcilia 

158. 

Nematoscelis  gracilis 

159. 

Stylocheiron  affine 

160. 

Stylocheiron  spp.  furcilia 

161. 

Eupnausiacea  caliptopici 

Decapoda 

162. 

Decapoda  larvae 

163. 

Lin  ifer  sp. 

164. 

Echinodertnata  larvae  (onhiopl.) 

Chaetognatha 

165. 

Pterosagitta  draco 

166. 

Aidanosagitta  sp. 

167. 

Ferosagitta  ferox 

168. 

E.  robusta 

169. 

Flassisagitta  enflata 

170. 

Parasigitta  septicoela 

171. 

Sagitta  pulchra 

172. 

Sagitta  sp. 

173. 

Serratosagitta  pacifica 

174. 

Chaetognatha  spp.  imm. 

Thaliacea 

175. 

Heliosalpa  virgula 

176. 

Salpa  sp. 

177. 

lasis  zonaria 

178. 

Weelia  cylindrit  a 

179. 

Salpidae  yon.  sp. 

Doliolidae 

ISO. 

Thalia  demot  ratica 

181. 

Dolioloides  rarum 

1S2. 

Doliolidae  yon.  sp 

App 

endicularia 

183. 

Oikopleura  sp  1 

184. 

Oikopleura  sp  II 

IS5. 

Pisces  Ian  ae 

* 
** 


* 
** 


* 
** 


** 


** 
** 


* 

** 


** 


* 
** 


** 

** 


* 
*** 


** 
** 


* 
*** 


** 
** 


^  *  *  *  *  * 


$£$:):  ***  $$$4 


2  IS 


As  noted  previously,  the  distribution  of  mesozooplankton 
within  the  region  is  mainly  due  to  the  heterogeneity  of 
hydrological  conditions  found  there  (Korshenko,  1988).  Asa 
result,  two  bands  of  increased  zooplankton  biomass  are  formed 
in  the  surface  layer  along  the  equator  (Vinogradov  &  Voronina, 
1963).  In  the  Southern  Hemisphere  west  of  140°W,  the  zone 
of  abundant  plankton  narrows  to  5°S^°S.  At  the  same  time, 
zooplankton  productivity  in  the  equatorial  region  increases 
from  east  to  west.  We  found  that  zooplankton  biomass  ranged 
from  5 1  to  200  mg/m3.  The  western  portion  of  the  region 
(Stations  1 19  and  120)  was  located  in  the  zone  of  abundant 
plankton  (Fig.  1 ).  The  total  biomass  of  mesozooplankton 
ranged  from  89  to  340  mg/m3  and  averaged  201  mg/m3 
(Table  2).  The  total  biomass  of  zooplankton  in  the  eastern 
portion  of  the  section  in  the  upper  200  m  layer  did  not  exceed 
163  mg/m1  (Fig.  3).  At  the  westernmost  point,  and  at  Station 
117.  the  biomass  was  maximum  and  amounted  to  321  and 
340  mg/m3,  respectively.  The  total  numbers  of  mesozooplankton 
at  different  stations  ranged  from  547  to  2,170  sp/m3  and 
averaged  1,044  sp/m3  (Fig.  3;  Table  2),  which  doubled  the 
known  quantity  of  plankton  organisms  (493  sp/m3)  known  in 
the  northern  portion  of  the  equatorial  region  (Korshenko, 
1 988).  In  the  eastern  section,  the  numbers  of  mesozooplankton 
ranged  from  547  to  765  sp/m3.  As  one  moved  toward  the 
equator,  starting  at  6°S,  the  numbers  of  mesozooplankton 
increased  to  a  maximum  of  2,170  sp/m1  at  Station  120 
(Table  2).  It  was  shown  that  the  qualitative  composition  and 
structure  of  the  community  at  Stations  1 17  and  120  differed 
appreciably  from  those  recorded  at  the  other  stations  in  the 
region.  This  is  evidently  related  to  the  characteristics  of  the 
structure  and  dynamics  of  the  water  masses. 

The  vertical  distribution  of  the  mesozooplankton  was  also 
different  at  different  stations.  At  six  of  seven  stations  (Fig.  4). 
most  of  the  mesozooplankton  was  concentrated  in  the  upper 
100-m  layer,  and  the  maximum  was  in  the  0-50-m  layer 
(Table  3;  Fig.  4),  corresponding  to  findings  cited  by  Korshenko 
(1988).  A  significant  increase  in  zooplankton  numbers  and 
biomass  with  depth  was  tracked  only  at  the  westernmost  point 
(Station  120).  Mesozooplankton  biomass  as  a  whole  increased 
with  depth  owing  to  an  increase  in  the  fraction  of  large-sized 
animals. 


In  addition  to  analyzing  the  vertical  distribution  of  total 
numbers  and  biomass,  we  also  examined  the  vertical  distribution 
of  individual  taxonomic  groups.  We  found  that  the  numbers  of 
Calanoida  and  Euphausiasea  decreased  with  depth,  yet  the 
biomass  remained  practically  unchanged  because  of  an  increase 
in  the  fraction  of  large-sized  forms  (Fig.  5;  Table  3).  The 
numbers  and  biomass  of  Siphonophora,  Polychaeta,  Ostracoda, 
Hapracticoida,  Amphipoda,  Chaetognatha,  and  Salpidae 
increased  with  depth.  The  numbers  and  biomass  of  Cyclopoida, 
Mysidae,  Decapoda,  and  Echinodermata,  on  the  other  hand, 
decreased  with  depth.  The  numbers  of  Doliolidae  were  constant 
at  all  the  levels,  and  the  biomass  increased  with  the  relative 
content  of  large-sized  animals. 

In  order  to  analyze  the  structure  of  the  mesozooplankton 
community,  we  divided  the  determined  forms  into  17  major 
systematic  groups.  The  frequency  of  occurrence  (by  numbers 
and  biomass)  of  14  of  these  basic  taxonomic  groups  is  shown 
in  Table  4.  The  maximum  fraction  of  numbers,  as  an  average 
for  the  cross  section,  belonged  to  Calanoida — 53.8%.  In  60% 
of  the  cases,  Calanoida  comprised  over  half  of  the  total  numbers. 
According  to  Korshenko  (1988),  the  numbers  of  Calanoida  in 
the  0-200-m  layer  amounted  to  45%  of  the  total  value.  The 
highest  numerical  percentage  of  Calanoida  (66.5%)  was  found 
on  Station  1 14.  In  the  western  portion  of  the  section,  Calanoida 
numbers  decreased  to  40%.  The  biomass  amounted  to  over  half 
of  the  total  value  only  in  the  region  of  the  Caroline  Atoll,  owing 
to  the  small  number  of  other  taxonomic  groups  composing  the 
community.  To  the  west,  the  relative  content  of  Doliolidae  was 
comparatively  high,  and  the  fraction  of  groups  other  than 
Calanoida  was  insignificant.  We  noted  a  tendency  for  the 
number  of  taxonomic  groups  to  increase  toward  the  equator. 
On  one  hand,  the  fraction  of  numbers  and  biomass  of  the 
dominant  group  (Calanoida)  decreased,  while  the  relative 
content  of  Cyclopoida,  Chaetognatha,  and  Siphonophora 
increased.  For  example,  the  fraction  of  numbers  and  biomass 
of  Cyclopoida  at  the  equator  was  48  and  29%,  respectively.  In 
addition  to  the  general  tendency  of  the  Calanoida  fraction  to 
decrease,  in  many  cases  the  typical  (Fig.  6)  structure  of  the 
community  broke  down  as  a  result  of  concentrations  of  animals 
of  a  particular  species.  For  example,  the  biomass  fraction  of 
Euphausiacea  was  maximum  (35.5%)  at  Station  1 17  as  a  result 


TABLE  2 


Total  numbers  and  biomass  of  mesozooplankton  in  the  200  m  surface  layer. 


Stations 

Numbers 

sp/m" 

Biomass 

sp/m' 

Levels,  m 

0-50 

50-100 

100-200 

0-200 

0-50 

50-100 

100-200 

0-200 

1  14 

755 

775 

_ 

765 

158 

131 

_ 

144 

115 

1.354 

826 

428 

759 

148 

202 

150 

163 

116 

791 

806 

246 

547 

87 

158 

55 

89 

117 

2,056 

1,153 

523 

1 .063 

387 

290 

342 

340 

1  IS 

1.028 

704 

699 

783 

124 

122 

146 

134 

119 

1,170 

1.947 

878 

1.218 

227 

220 

211 

217 

120 

1 ,439 

2.137 

2,560 

2.170 

126 

226 

466 

321 

Average  values 

1.127 

1,193 

889 

1 .044 

180 

193 

228 

201 

Remark:  For  Station  1 14.  the  data  and  results  were  obtained  for  the  0-100  m  layer. 


Depth,  m 


500 


Numbcrv  sp/ltl 

1500  2000 


200 


Biomass.  mg/m 
100   200  300  400  500 


Fig.  4. 


Vertical  distribution  ofmesozooplankton;  (a)  vertical  distribution  of 
numbers:  and  (b)  vertical  distribution  of  biomass. 


of  massive  development  of  Euphausia  similis  \ar.  "armatu"  in 
this  area.  Korshenkol  1988)  notedasimilarca.se  for  a  population 
of  E.  similis.  The  same  value  (35.5%  of  total  biomass)  was 
shown  by  the  biomass  fraction  of  Chaetognatha  at  specific 
levels  of  the  western  portion  of  the  section.  A  typical  portrait 
of  the  structure  of  the  mesozooplankton  community  of  the 
region  is  shown  in  Fig.  6. 

The  general  pattern  of  variability  of  the  vertical  structure 
had  the  following  characteristics:  both  the  numbers  and  biomass 
of  Calanoida,  Decapoda.  and  Appendicularia  and  the  biomass 
fraction  of  Cyclopoida  and  Siphonophora  decreased  with  depth. 
The  relative  content  of  other  groups  (Harpacticoida.  Amphipoda. 
Euphausiasea,  Ostracoda.  Chaetognatha.  Salpidae.  Doliolidae. 
Siphonophora.  and  Polychaeta)  increased  with  depth. 

Conclusion 

/.  The  qualitative  composition  of  the  mesozooplankton 
was  nonuniform  in  the  region  studied.  As  one  moved  toward 
the  equator,  species  diversity  of  the  zooplankton  increased. 
The  smallest  number  of  species  was  recorded  in  the  region  of 
Caroline  Atoll.  In  the  majority  of  cases,  the  number  of  species 
increased  with  depth.  It  was  postulated  that  the  heterogeneitv 
of  the  horizontal  and  vertical  distributions  ofmesozooplankton 
resulted  from  vertical  daily  migrations  and  equatorial  ascents 
of  the  water  masses. 

Twenty-one  species  ofmesozooplankton  reached  numbers 
above  100  sp/m':  of  these  groups,  the  group  of  the  most  diverse 
composition  was  Calanoida.  The  number  of  massive  species 
increased  from  east  to  west. 


TABLE  3 

Vertical  distribution  of  mesozooplankton 

Levels 

0 

50 

m 

50- 

00  m 

100 

200  m 

Taxons 

N 

B 

N 

B 

N 

B 

I .  Syphonophora 

3.2 

17.2 

5.3 

19.4 

7.7 

20.5 

2.  Polychaeta 

2.1 

3.2 

2.6 

3.3 

3.8 

6.2 

3.  Ostracoda 

0.3 

0.2 

1.2 

1.0 

4.4 

3.5 

4.  Calanoida 

687.0 

60.9 

588.0 

65.6 

424.0 

59.0 

5.  Cyclopoida 

553.0 

30.0 

429.0 

3.8. 1 

328.0 

23.0 

6.  Harpacticoida 

31.0 

0.2 

73.0 

0.5 

47.0 

0.6 

7.  Amphipoda 

1.3 

5.2 

2.6 

9.8 

3.6 

9.8 

8.  Mysidae 

1.2 

0.1 

2.6 

0.3 

0.7 

0.1 

9.  Euphausiasea 

12.7 

19.7 

3.4 

18.3 

13.3 

21.8 

10.  Decapoda 

1.7 

3.0 

1.6 

2  2 

1.1 

1.8 

1 1 .  Echinodermata 

5.9 

0.0 

4.7 

0.0 

3.2 

0.0 

12.  Chaetognatha 

1 3.5 

21.4 

17.8 

24.7 

25.3 

57.6 

13.  Salpidae 

0.8 

10.4 

1.5 

3.1 

1.6 

14.2 

14.  Doliolidae 

0.9 

14.4 

1.4 

20.4 

1.0 

18.3 

15.  Appendicularia 

154.0 

4.9 

69. 1 

2.1 

33.7 

1.0 

16.  Pisces 

0.6 

2.1 

1.3 

3.6 

0.8 

2.3 

All  Groups 

1.227 

180 

.193 

193 

889 

228 

N  -  average  numbers,  sp/m3 

B  -  average  values  ofbiomass, 

sp/m 

220 


N,  sp./m 


B.  mg/m 

N,  sp./m 

1 

Siphonophora 

80 

40 

60 

30 

40 

20 

20 

20 

10 

III 

0 

n 

0 

B.mg/m  Harpacticoida 


20     119     118     117     116     115     114       C\ 


N.  sp./m 

B, 

mg/m 

Calanoida 

101)0    - 

XQ 

soo  - 

6Q 

600  - 
400  - 

4Q 

2(1 

\i 

/     •    \    / 

200  - 

II 

o- 

i          i 

ill            i 

120     119    118     117     116     115     114     C 


N,  sp./m" 


120   119  118  117  116  115  114   CT 


30 

20 

10 

0 


20. 

A         Euphausiacea 

nil 

80. 

60 

411 

- 

;u 

- 

ii 

tt       »     — -• 

- 

! 

1                1 

— i r 1 1 ■ 

120   119  118   117  116   115  114   CT 


N,  sp./m 

1000 
800 
600 
400 
200 
0 


hi  I 


B,  mg/m  '  Cyclopoida 


120     119     |  |,s     117     116     115     114       C- 


N,  sp./m" 

10 
0 


1.  ma/m" 


Amphipoda 


B.  mg/m 

Chaetognatha 

,  sp./m 

9o| 
70 

40  - 

50 

30- 

30 

20  . 

10 
0 

^\vv 

10  - 

~*              \ 

0 

1           1            1           1           1               1 

120      1 19    118      117     116     115     I  14       C- 


20     119     118     117     116     115     114      CT 


1 
N.  sp./m 

B,  mg/m" 

Appendicularia 

120- 

ioo- 

80- 

60" 

5 

40- 

4 
3 

^\ 

A\/^" 

20- 

2 
1. 

'     V 

\_ 

0_ 

0 

120     119      118      117     116      115       114    CT 


Fig.  5.    Horizontal  distribution  of  the  main  taxonomic  groups  of  mesozooplankton. 


221 


TABLE  4 


Structure  of  mesozooplankton  community. 

Stations 

114 

1 

5 

1  16 

117 

118 

119 

1 

20 

Average 

values 

Taxa 

%  N 

9c  B 

',  N 

',  B 

'.   \ 

%  B 

%  N 

9c  B 

%  N 

%B 

',  N 

%B 

',  N 

',  B 

'.  N 

\  B 

1 .    Syphonophora 

0.3 

2.5 

0.1 

1.3 

0.3 

7.8 

1.4 

10.5 

0.6 

7.1 

0.5 

17.8 

0.4 

8.4 

0.5 

7.9 

2.    Polychaeta 

0.0 

0.0 

0.3 

2.5 

0.4 

2  i 

0.5 

2.3 

1.3 

0.3 

0.4 

3.8 

0.1 

1.5 

0.6 

1.8 

3.    Ostracoda 

— 

— 

0.3 

0.8 

0.4 

1.8 

0.3 

0.4 

0.9 

1.1 

0.2 

0.8 

0.1 

0.3 

0.3 

0.7 

4.    Calanoida 

66.5 

54.3 

55.9 

42. S 

51.0 

34.0 

57.9 

20.1 

56.2 

31.9 

48.8 

34.8 

40.0 

28.2 

53.8 

33.7 

5.    Cyclopoida 

24. 8 

10.2 

30.2 

11.3 

28.2 

12.2 

20.6 

4.5 

24.2 

10.5 

30.0 

9.6 

47.9 

28.9 

29.4 

12.4 

6.    Harpacticoida 

1.4 

0.0 

4.2 

0.1 

6.6 

0.2 

4.3 

0.2 

8.4 

0.2 

5.1 

0.2 

2.6 

0.2 

4.7 

0.2 

7.    Mysidae 

— 

— 

— 

— 

0.2 

0.2 

0.0 

0.0 

0.1 

0.1 

0.2 

0.1 

— 

— 

0.1 

0.1 

8.    Amphipoda 

0.2 

2.0 

0.5 

6.1 

0.2 

4.2 

0.7 

6.4 

0.3 

5.4 

0.2 

2.6 

0.1 

0.8 

0.3 

3.9 

9.    Euphausiasea 

0.5 

0.4 

0.4 

0.8 

1.0 

1.0 

2  2 

35.2 

0.6 

1.0 

0.8 

~>  2 

1.4 

3.7 

1.0 

6.3 

10.  Decapoda 

0.3 

0.6 

0.1 

0.9 

0.6 

3.2 

0.3 

1.3 

0.1 

2.0 

0.5 

0.3 

0.1 

04 

0.4 

1.2 

1  1 .  Chaetoanatha 

1.0 

9.3 

3.1 

20.5 

1.8 

13.7 

2  2 

8.7 

1.9 

18.6 

2.1 

19.6 

1.2 

16.7 

1.9 

15.3 

12.   Salpidae 

0.0 

1.0 

0.0 

8.2 

0.3 

7.7 

0.1 

1.2 

— 

— 

0.3 

4.6 

0.1 

2.5 

0.1 

3.6 

13.  Doliolidae 

0.2 

18.3 

0.1 

3.6 

0.1 

10.4 

0.1 

3.3 

0.1 

11.3 

0.1 

1.5 

0.0 

6.0 

0.1 

7.7 

14.  Appendicularia 

5.3 

0.8 

4.1 

0.9 

3.9 

0.7 

8.4 

1.5 

6.7 

1.3 

10.9 

1.9 

5.7 

1.7 

6.4 

1.3 

%  N  -  fraction  of  to 

al  numbers 

'  1  B  -  fraction  of  total  biomass. 

"3    -D 

— i 

u 

j= 

c 

rj     o 

OJJ 

■* 

j 

-z 

-  C 

§■ 

3 

u 

X 

Hi 

u 

a. 

< 

1    \'l 

6     T\p 

ca 

structure 

total 

m 

mt 

ers 

;  ai 

'•J 

DO 

a 

-D 

o. 

E 

- 

^T" 

0 

7Z 

— 

s: 

c 

Q. 

E 

a 

y. 

Q 

X 

u 

a. 
< 

%Ti 

ton  c 

tmmunits 

:  (a)  structure 

ot 

and  ih)  structure  of  total  biomass. 


2.  In  numbers  and  biomass  of  mesozooplankton.  this 
region  can  be  characterized  as  medium-productive,  with  the 
western  section  more  productive  than  the  east.  The  station 
poorest  in  mesozooplankton  was  near  Caroline  Atoll.  The 
average  numbers  of  mesozooplankton  were  maximum  in  the 
0-50-m  layer  and  decreased  w  ith  depth.  On  the  other  hand,  the 
average  biomass  increased  with  depth  owing  to  the  increase  in 
the  fraction  of  large-sized  forms 

3.  The  structure  o\'  the  mesozooplankton  community  as  a 
whole  was  characterized  by  the  dominance  of  the  fraction  of 
numbers  and  biomass  of  Calanoida  and  Cyclopoida.  In  the 
majority  of  cases,  half  of  the  total  consisted  of  Calanoida.  In 
the  western  portion  of  the  section,  the  relative  content  of  other 
groups  (Chaetognatha.  Euphausiacea)  increased,  while  the 
fraction  of  Calanoida  decreased. 


3.4     Zooneuston  of  the  Tropical  Pacific 

YUZENALY  P.  ZAITSEV.  LEONID  N.  POLISHCHUK,  and  BORIS  G.  ALEXANDROV 

Department  of  Active  Marine  Surface  Hydrobiology,  Institute  of  Southern  Seas  Biology,  Odessa  Branch,  USSR 


Introduction 

Seventy-nine  zooneuston  samples  were  taken  at  23  stations 
in  tropical  areas  of  the  Pacific  Ocean  (Table  1 ).  The  sampling 
equipment  consisted  of  a  PNS-2  two-tier  plankton-neuston  net 
and  an  MNT  fry-neuston  trawl  (Zaitsev,  1 97 1 ).  The  PNS-2  net 
(mouth  area  0.1  nr;  mesh  size  1 50  urn)  permitted  simultaneous 
manual  skimming  of  the  upper  surface  of  the  upper  layers  of  the 
pelagial  (i.e.,  of  neustal  [0-5  cm]  and  subneustal  [5-25  cm]). 
The  MNT  trawl  (moutn  area  0.39  m2;  mesh  size  350  p.m)  made 
possible  high-speed  catching  of  mobile  neustons  at  a  vessel 
trawling  speed  of  3  m/s.  The  average  skim  duration  was 
10  min. 

To  facilitate  the  study  of  neuston  community  formation, 
the  whole  of  the  ocean  area  investigated  was  subdivided  into 
three  types  of  zones,  namely  1.  atoll  lagoons  (shallow  water; 
complete  or  partial  isolation  from  the  ocean;  developed  littoral 
communities);  2.  semienclosed  marginal  seas  (relatively  little 
exchange  with  the  ocean;  mostly  shallow  water;  well-developed 
pelagic-shelf  communities);  and  J.  open-ocean  waters  (pelagic 
communities  predominant).  The  sampling  effort  covered  an 
extensive  portion  of  the  tropical  Pacific  from  Caroline  Atoll  in 
the  east  (154°51'E).  The  latitudinal  limits  of  station  locations 
were  1 1°20'N  and  8°40'S. 

TABLE  1 

Neuston  sample  collection  in  the  tropical  Pacific. 


Area 

\ 

umber  of 

Static 

ns 

Sampl 

es 

PNS-2 

MNT 

Caroline  Atoll 

3 

22 

— 

Caroline  Atoll/Phoenix  Islands 

4 

8 

4 

Phoenix  Islands/Gilbert  Islands 

6 

12 

1 

Marianas  sector 

5 

10 

4 

South  China  Sea 

5 
70 

18 
9 

- 

Total                           23 

The  neuston  (surface  plankton)  of  the  tropical  Pacific  has 
been  described  in  publications  of  a  general  character  (Geinrikh. 
1 964 ).  There  are  also  papers  on  the  distribution  of  its  individual 
components  (e.g.,  of  copepods  of  the  Pontellaidae  family 
[Sherman.  1963;  Voronina.  1964]  and  oceanic  water  striders  of 
the  genus  Halohates  [Herring,  1961]).  Results  of  pleuston 
studies  are  reported  in  a  major  survey  paper  by  Savilov  ( 1 969). 


The  need  for  the  present  study  was  dictated  by  a  considerable 
hiatus  in  observations,  as  well  as  by  the  scarcity  of  quantitative 
data  on  neuston  distribution  in  conditions  of  increasingly 
widespread  and  intense  pollution  of  the  World  Ocean. 

The  zooneuston  of  the  tropical  Pacific  found  during  the 
present  studies  was  represented  by  epineuston  consisting  of 
oceanic  water  striders  (Halohates)  as  well  as  by  hyponeuston: 
copepods  of  the  family  Pontellidae,  marine  snails  of  the  genus 
Janthina,  larvae  of  benthic  invertebrates,  and  fishes.  In  addition, 
allowance  was  made  for  the  usual  neuston  components  in  the 
form  of  semisubmerged  organisms:  Physalia  (Siphonophora), 
Velella  velella,  and  Porpita pacifica  (Chondrophora). 

Analysis  of  the  quantitative  distribution  of  organisms 
leads  to  some  basic  conclusions  regarding  the  distinctive 
features  of  neuston  in  the  types  of  water  areas  studied. 

The  average  counts  of  animals  in  the  open  ocean  and  in  the 
South  China  Sea  were  comparable  (2,730  and  3,160  ind/m3), 
while  the  concentration  of  animals  in  the  lagoon  at  Caroline 
Atoll  was  50  times  lower.  Larger  organisms  (medusae,  salps, 
fish  larvae  and  fry ,  euphausids  hyperiidea,  et  cetera)  constituted 
aconsiderable  fraction  of  the  total  neuston  biomass,  accounting 
for  as  much  as  2.5  g/nV  (Station  1 19)  and  sometimes  attaining 
values  an  entire  order  of  magnitude  higher  ( Station  128),  where 
Porpitae  were  dominant. 

The  relative  neuston  content  was  richer  in  Caroline  Atoll' s 
lagoon,  the  reverse  of  that  for  animals  overall  (Table  2).  The 
low  numbers  of  oceanic  animal  species  in  the  lagoon  against  a 
background  of  early  developmental  stages  of  benthic 
invertebrates  (Decapoda,  Gastropoda,  Cirripedia,  et  cetera) 
were  due  to  shallowness  of  the  waters  and  their  relative 
isolation  from  the  open  ocean.  The  distinctiveness  of  the 
individual  sea  area  categories  (atoll,  marginal  sea.  open  ocean) 
was  clearly  evident  from  the  proportion  of  benthic  animal 
larvae  in  the  total  neuston  count.  Their  percentage  content 
decreased  steadily  from  its  maximum  value  of  99%  in  the 
lagoon  to  75%  in  the  South  China  Sea  and  46%  in  the  open 
ocean.  The  epineustonic  Halohates,  which  breed  along  coasts, 
were  similarly  distributed,  while  the  Pontellidae  distribution 
behaved  inversely  (0.24%  and  54%,  respectively). 

In  addition  to  benthic-invertebrate  larvae,  the  neustal  also 
contained  large  numbers  of  pelagic  animals  at  early  stages  of 
ontogenesis,  which  validates  calling  neuston  "the  ocean's 
breeding  ground." 

Comparison  of  the  numbers  of  organisms  in  the  microlayers 
investigated  confirmed  the  existence  of  conditions  conducive 
to  neuston  growth  in  all  of  the  water  areas  studied.  The  sole 
exception  to  this  rule  was  the  waters  of  the  Marianas  sector 
(Stations  121-126)  (Table  3). 


223 


TABLE  2 

Components  (counts  expressed  as  individuals/m')  of  neuston 

biocoenoses  in  the  basic  water  area  types  of  the  tropical 

Pacific. 


B,  in 
mg/m  * 


Component 


Basic  water  area  type 
Caroline    South  Open  waters 
Atoll      China        of  the 
lagoon      Sea         Pacific 


1. 

Pleuston 

0 

1.27 

0.20 

2. 

Epineuston 

0.31 

0.13 

0.05 

3. 

Hyponeuston 

a)  benthic-invertebrate 

37.36 

188.35 

164.13 

and  fish  larvae 

37.36 

143.15 

75.71 

b)  Pontellidae  and  Janthia 

0 

45.20 

88.42 

4. 

Others* 
Relative  neuston 

26.63 

2,968.9 

2,566.6 

content,  % 

59 

6 

6 

*  This  category  groups  together  mesozooplankton  components 
found  in  the  surface  layer,  but  distinct  from  the  enumerated 
categories  of  organisms  in  being  more  uniformly  distributed 
over  the  water  column. 

TABLE  3 

Dominance  of  organisms  in  neustal  expressed  as  a 
percentage. 


Sea  area 


', 


Caroline  Atoll  lagoon 
South  China  Sea 
Open  ocean 
Marianas  sector 


1.3  ±0.1 
2.5  ±0.6 
1.5  ±0.3 
0.9  ±  0.4 


A  degree  of  symmetry  of  neuston  distribution  with  respect 
to  the  equator  was  noted  (see  Fig.  1 ).  This  was  evidence  of  the 
effect  of  the  northern  and  southern  tradewind  currents  and  of 
the  anticyclonic  current  between  them, 

The  observed  pattern  of  organism  distribution  agrees  with 
the  data  of  Voronina  ( 1964),  who  established  that  peak  counts 
of  the  most  common  pontellid  Pontella  tenuiremis  occurred  at 
1°N  and  1CS.  The  meridional  components  of  surface  current 


100 
6 
4 
2 

• 
• 

• 

•     \                                        * 

• . 

• 

0 

10 
North 

8 

6        4        2        0        2        4 

Degrees  of  latitude 

6        8 

South 

Fig. 1 . 


Latitudinal  distribution  of  neuston  biomass  (B)  in  the  tropical  waters 
of  the  Pacific  Ocean. 


point  outwards  from  the  equator,  so  that  species  that  inhabit  the 
topmost  water  layer  are  constantly  carried  away  from  it.  The 
departing  water  is  replaced  by  deeper-lying  water  free  of 
surface  animals.  The  result  is  an  acute  trough  in  surface  species 
along  the  equator  (Sverdrup  et  al.,  cited  by  Voronina,  1964). 

Constituting  an  agglomeration  of  hydrobionts.  neuston 
attracts  both  aquatic  and  aerial  predators.  We  know,  for 
example,  that  decapod  crustacean  and  pontellid  larvae  are  part 
of  the  diet  of  tunas,  bonitos,  and  other  epipelagic  fishes  ( Marchal. 
1959).  Porpita  are  consumed  by  marine  turtles,  while  fish 
larvae  and  fry  are  food  for  marine  snakes  (Zaitsev,  1971). 
Neuston  animals  are  an  important  part  of  the  diet  of  seabirds. 
Flying  fish  are  caught  on  the  fly  by  frigate  birds  (Fregatidae) 
and  terns  (Laridae).  Procellariiformes  birds  (Puffinus)  have  a 
variety  of  ways  of  feeding  on  neuston;  albatrosses  ( Diomedea) 
and  fulmars  (Fulmarus)  snatch  their  prey  from  the  surface,  and 
fork-tailed  storm-petrels  (Oceanodroma)  do  so  while 
performing  a  "mincing  walk"  on  water  (Boaden&  Seed,  1985). 
In  waters  close  to  shore,  neuston  is  eaten  by  skimmers 
(Rhynchopidae)  with  their  long  cultiform  gonys  (Zaitsev, 
1971 ).  According  to  the  latest  count  (Day  et  al.,  1984).  there 
are  at  least  50  species  of  birds  that  feed  on  neuston. 

In  conformity  with  what  is  usually  the  case  with  distribution 
in  the  ocean,  neuston  is  most  profuse  in  areas  where  currents 
converge.  However,  recent  decades  have  seen  a  proliferation 
in  the  same  areas  of  various  kinds  of  plastic  debris  ( Day  et  al. , 
1984).  Looking  for  neuston,  marine  birds  often  swallow  these 
foreign  objects,  whose  effect  is  invariably  harmful  and  often 
fatal.  With  their  high  adsorption  coefficients,  oil  lumps  and 
plastic  objects  tend  to  have  a  buildup  of  toxic  substances  on 
their  surface  (Osipov  &  Charykov,  1987),  thus  inhibiting  the 
development  of  invertebrates  and  fishes  in  the  neustal.  This,  in 
turn,  can  only  have  a  negative  impact  on  the  bioproductivity  of 
the  entire  ocean. 


224 


3.5     Observations  of  Seabirds  along  a 

14,892-km  Cruise  Track  in  the  Tropical 
Pacific  Ocean  and  the  Bohol,  Sulu,  and 
South  China  Seas 


ANGELA  K.  KEPLER1,  CAMERON  B.  KEPLER\  DAVID  H.  ELLIS5,  and  JEFFREY  S.  HATFIELD  } 
US  Fish  &  Wildlife  Service,  Patuxent  Wildlife  Research  Center,  Southeast  Research  Station,  Athens,  Georgia,  USA 
*US  Fish  &  Wildlife  Service,  Patuxent  Wildlife  Research  Center,  Laurel,  Maryland,  USA 


Introduction 

This  study  forms  a  small  part  of  the  research  efforts  of  the 
First  Joint  US-USSR  Central  Pacific  Expedition  (Line  and 
Phoenix  Groups.  Gilbert  Islands.  Micronesia,  inland  Philippine 
Seas,  and  South  China  Sea).  Seabird  observations  were  made 
from  the  Soviet  research  vessel  (R/V)  Akademik  Korolev 
(7.000  tons,  1 24  m  in  length)  from  Hilo,  Hawaii,  to  Singapore 
(Figs.  1,2)  via  Christmas  Island  (02°N,  157°W)  and  Caroline 
Atoll  (10°S,  150°W). 

The  primary  objectives  of  the  expedition  were  to 
characterize  and  contrast  the  fundamental  oceanographic, 
hydrochemical,  microbiological,  hydrobiological,  and 
ecological  parameters  of  arctic  and  tropical  marine  ecosystems. 
Emphasis  was  placed  on  the  primary  productivity  and  ecological 
health  of  these  two  major  areas,  including  pollution  studies 
involving  multidisciplinary  experiments  conducted  jointly  by 
scientists  of  both  countries. 

In  this  paper,  we  report  the  marine  distribution  of  seabirds 
and  other  transoceanic  migrants,  such  as  shorebirds  and  ducks, 
during  the  tropical  portion  of  the  cruise,  which  covered 
14.892  km  from  9  September  to  31  October  1988.  Weconducted 
a  total  of  1 6 1  hours  of  observations  on  transects  representing  an 
area  of  3,609  km2,  during  which  time  the  ship  traveled 
4.5 1  1  km  (Table  1 ).  Our  observations  covered  21  degrees  of 
latitude  and  1 07  degrees  of  longitude.  Because  the  cruise  track 
traversed  many  island  archipelagos,  we  subdivided  it  into  the 
following  7  regions  (Figs.  1,2),  all  lying  between  14°N  and 
10°S  latitudes: 

Region  1       Line  Islands,  including  waters  south  of  Hawaii 
(150°Wto  160°W); 

Region  II  Phoenix  Islands  to  the  international  dateline  ( 1 60°W 
to  180°); 

Region  III  Gilbert  Islands  (180°  to  165°E): 
Region  IV    Caroline  Islands',  Micronesia  ( 165°E  to  136°E); 
Region  V     Philippine  Sea  and  Basin  ( 1 36°E  to  1 25°E); 
Region  VI     Inland  Philippine  Seas:    Bohol  (Mindanao)  and 
Sulu  Seas.  Balabac  Strait  (125°E  to  1 17°E);  and 


Not  to  be  confused  with  Caroline  Atoll  (Island),  Southern 
Line  Islands,  at  10°00S  latitude,  1 50°  13'W  longitude. 


Region  VII  South  China  Sea.  Philippines  to  Singapore  ( 1 1 7°E 
to  103°E). 

We  interpret  our  results  within  the  contexts  of  1.  breeding 
phenology,  nonbreeding  dispersion,  and  migration  (Fig.  3); 

2.  proximity  to  known  breeding  colonies  and  nearest  landfalls; 

3.  previous  at-sea  records;  4.  anthropogenic  factors  such  as 
population  density,  environmental  alterations  to  coastal  habitats, 
and  pollution  (see  Chapters  2,3);  and  5.  general  areas  of 
upwelling,  providing  locally  rich  feeding  areas. 

Seabirds,  more  than  any  other  group  of  living  organisms, 
illustrate  that  the  world's  oceans  are  united.  For  example, 
parasitic  jaegers  (Stercorarius  parasiticus)  breed  in  Siberia 
and  Alaska,  then  migrate  south  to  winter  in  south  temperate 
waters  of  the  Pacific.  Indian,  and  Atlantic  Oceans.  En  route,  in 
the  Pacific,  they  skirt  all  four  continents,  passing  through  150 
degrees  of  latitude  and  at  least  80  degrees  of  longitude. 

The  1988  US-USSR  expedition  provided  an  opportunity 
to  study  assemblages  of  birds,  highly  visible  indicators  of  the 
health  of  marine  ecosystems,  over  vast  areas  of  the  Pacific 
Ocean.  Studies  of  the  marine  environments  utilized  by  these 
birds  provide  the  knowledge  to  encourage  practical  action 
toward  their  conservation. 

Previous  Studies 

Although  the  broad  distributions  of  central  and  western 
Pacific  seabirds  are  well-known  (Murphy,  1936;  Mayr,  1945; 
Delacour  &  Mayr,  1946;  Baker,  1951;  Clapp,  1967;  Clapp  & 
Sibley,  1967,  1968;  Amerson,  1969;  King,  1970.  1973,  1974a; 
Nelson,  1975,  1978;  Perry,  1980;  Engbring,  1983;  Garnett. 
1983,  1984;  Gould,  1983;  Harrison,  1985;  Pratt,  Bruner  & 
Berrett,  1987),  much  remains  to  be  learned  of  their  detailed 
distribution  patterns  in  the  Southern  Line  Islands  and  areas 
west  of  Micronesia.  Information  on  seabirds  in  southeast  Asia, 
at  least  in  English,  is  incomplete  and  often  outdated  (Delacour 
&  Mayr,  1946;  Delacour,  1947;  King  &  Dickinson,  1975; 
Nelson,  1978;  Harrison,  1985).  We  are  unfamiliar  with  the 
literature  in  Asian  languages  and  have  not  pursued  the  numerous 
reports  and  publications  resulting  from  marine  oriented  trips  to 
islands  and  reefs  in  the  Asian  region  through  which  we  passed 
(UNEP,  1984a,b;IUCN,  1 988  a,b),  some  of  which  may  contain 


225 


Not  thern 

Mariana 

Islands 


Marshall    Islands 


^T^io/i* 


..   M/t-M 


Papua  NewGuinea     -I  •  '         knmwWT; 


Kiribati  * 


PACIFIC  OCEAN  /./.• 

i       I 

! 


Tuvalu 


■   ft/l?-     k  *IWT_IM*Tl 


SSm  #*  \» 


10    5  10/4 


■  '•  -   \  ,/2e 


*«Oi»„     ,s«.»«°s 
Tokelau 


\"" 


<  s  _$  to'i 


Fig.  I.    Cruise  track  of  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev:  Regions  I  (Line  Islands),  II  (Phoenix  Islands).  Ill  (Gilbert  Islands),  and  IV  (Caroline  Islands.  Micronesia), 
15  September-17  October  1988.  Solid  lines  on  cruise  track  represent  daily  observation  hours,  dotted  lines,  hours  of  darkness. 


PACIFIC 
OCEAN 


AK  AOEMIK 


I- ID  CRUISE  TRACK 

' 1  KOROLEV 

La  J  CRUISE  REGION  BOUNDARIES   "*«". 

1 D  fff) 


Fig,  2.    Cruise  track  of  the  WV  Akademik  Korole\ :  Regions  V  (Philippine  Sea  and  Basin),  VI  (Bohol  and  Sulu  Seas),  and  VD  (South  China  Seal.  18-31  October 
lliss    Solid  lines  on  cruise  track  represenl  dail)  observation  horns,  dotted  lines,  hours  ol  darkness 


lib 


TABLE  1 

Relative  abundance  of  seubirds  in  each  sector  of  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev  cruise  track.  1 5  September-3 1  October  1 988. 


Region 

I 

I] 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

VII 

Total 

Observation  Hours 

29.95 

21.88 

18.00 

42.78 

13.70 

14.57 

20.45 

161.33 

Kilometers  Tra\eled 

Durinc  Observations 

772.91 

656.73 

554.70 

1.210.87 

356.67 

404.14 

555.38 

4.5 11.41 

Area  Covered  bv 

Observations  (km:) 

618.33 

525.38 

443.76 

968.70 

285.34 

323.31 

444.31 

3,609.13 

No.  Bird  Species  Seen 

27 

25 

14 

19 

6 

4 

8 

46 

No.  Individuals  Seen 

457 

1.796 

495 

799 

34 

22 

65 

3.668 

Average  No.  Birds  Seen/hr 

15.3 

82.1 

27.5 

18.7 

2.5 

1.4 

3.2 

22.7 

Average  No.  Birds  Seen/10  km 

of  Observations 

5.9 

27.3 

8.9 

6.6 

1.0 

0.5 

1.2 

8.1 

Average  Bird  Density 

Per  lOknr 

10.20 

45.72 

14.6 

10.38 

1.76 

1.63 

3.95 

12.61 

No.  Families  Seen 

7 

7 

5 

9 

4 

4 

4 

11 

Each  hour  is  the  combined  total  of  two  people  simultaneously  viewing  opposite  sides  of  the  ship,  and  thus  equals  2  hours  of  observation 
in  some  other  papers. 


relevant  seabird  records.  Most  of  the  previous  information  on 
breeding  and  at-sea  distribution  of  tropical  seabirds  was  gathered 
from  1963  to  1969  (Humphrey,  1965)  by  the  US  National 
Museum's  (Smithsonian  Institution)  Pacific  Ocean  Biological 
Survey  Program  (POBSP). 

Methods 

Daily  at-sea  observations  were  conducted  from  the  flying 
bridge  of  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev,  12  m  above  the  sea 
surface  and  within  a  viewing  arc  of  approximately  180°. 
During  the  first  week  we  honed  our  observation  skills,  using 
Harrison  ( 1 985 )  as  a  major  reference.  Thereafter,  we  maintained 
almost  constant  watch  during  daylight  hours  (29  days  during 
9  September-3 1  October).  Methods  were  based  on  those  of  the 
POBSP  (King,  1970;  Gould.  1974),  modified  by  techniques 
utilized  elsewhere  (Tasker  <?/«/.,  1984;Haney,  1985;Gould& 
Forsell.  1989).  The  watch  rotated  between  three  observers 
(AKK,  CBK,  and  DHE),  with  two  observers  on  watch  at  all 
times.  A  change  of  one  observer  took  place  every  hour  on  the 
hour,  each  person  alternating  2-hour  watches  with  a  1-hour 
break  to  reduce  fatigue.  Observations  began  10-15  min  before 
sunrise  and  terminated  1 0-1 5  min  after  sunset.  Because  we  did 
not  have  dedicated  ship  time,  observations  were  interrupted  by 
periodic  oceanographic  sampling  stations,  during  which  time 
no  seabird  counts  were  made.  Counts  were  not  conducted 
within  10  km  of  oceanic  islands  where  we  landed  (Christmas 
Island,  Caroline  Atoll,  and  Tarawa),  but  were  made  close  to 
land  in  the  Bohol,  Sulu.  and  South  China  Seas. 

Our  ship  speed  averaged  15  knots  during  observations, 
higher  than  the  10  knots  that  Gould  &  Forsell  ( 1989)  consider 
ideal.   At  this  time  of  year  in  the  tropical  Pacific,  our  higher 


speed  did  not  cause  identification  problems  because  few  species 
were  found  in  large  numbers.  When  approaching  or  leaving  a 
sampling  station,  we  interrupted  observations  if  the  ship  was 
moving  less  than  5  knots. 

Bird  counts  were  contained  within  rectangular  strips 
extending  400  m  to  each  side  of  the  ship.  Observers  stood  left 
and  right  of  the  midline  of  the  ship,  counting  all  birds  seen 
400  m  or  less  ahead  of  the  ship  on  their  side,  to  a  line 
perpendicular  to  the  ship's  direction  at  their  position.  Thus 
each  hour  of  observation  represents  the  pooled  records  of  two 
observers  watching  a  combined  strip  800  m  wide.  Data  were 
recorded  on  standardized  field  forms  using  local  time.  The 
following  information  was  included:  identification  (to  species 
or  subspecies  when  possible),  number  of  birds  per  sighting, 
feeding  flocks  and  other  associations,  flight  direction,  plumage 
(adult,  juvenile,  sex),  and  weather.  Due  to  poor  lighting  or 
weather  conditions,  some  birds  were  identified  only  to  genus  or 
family.  All  birds  sitting,  flying,  or  flushed  within  the  transect 
were  counted,  and  their  different  behaviors  noted.  No  birds 
were  collected.  The  ship's  position  (latitude/longitude)  and 
speed  were  recorded  at  the  beginning  and  end  of  each  hourly 
observation  period.  Ship-following  species  were  noted  during 
position  checks  and  intermittently  during  the  watch  and  were 
recorded  when  first  seen. 

Because  the  visibility  of  different  species  at  sea  varies 
greatly,  we  subdivided  the  maximum  400  m  transect  width  into 
3  bands  corresponding  to  the  approximate  detection  distances 
of  each  species:  /.  1 00-m  band — small  species,  ordinarily  seen 
relatively  close  to  the  ship,  includes  shorebirds,  storm-petrels, 
and Bulwer's petrel  (Bulweria bulweri); 2.  30-m band — gadfly 
petrels,  shearwaters,  most  larids,  and  anatids,  and  3.  400  m 
band,  large  or  conspicuous  species  such  as  boobies,  frigatebirds. 


227 


Fig.  3.  Status  ol  bud  species  observed  along  the  cruise  track  of  the  R/V 
Akademik  Korolev,  15  September— 3 1  October  1988.  Nonbreeding 
visitors  and  migrants  migrate  north  or  south  to  breed. 


tropicbirds,  and  white  terns  (Gygis  alba).  These  different 
detection  distances  were  used  as  a  basis  for  calculating  the 
densities  and  area  coverages  for  each  different  species  (Hunt 
era/.,  1 98  I;Briggs  <■/<//..  19871.  Forease  of  comparison  within 
regions  and  with  previous  studies  (King,  1970;  Tasker  et  ai, 
1984)  and  because  the  number  of  birds  normally  seen  in 
tropical  seas  is  lower  than  that  observed  in  colder  waters,  bird 
densities  were  calculated  in  3  ways:  number/hour  (per 
2  observers),  number/10  linear  km,  and  number/10  km2.  In  this 
paper,  numbers/ 10  km'  are  used  for  comparison  between 
species  and  regions;  the  other  2  calculated  values  are  reported 
in  Table  2. 

Prior  to  the  expedition,  we  examined  skins  of  Pacific 
seabndsat  the  US  National  Museum.  Washington.  DC.  focusing 
on  variable,  polymorphic,  and  particularly  difficult  species  to 
identify.  Terminology  used  in  this  paper  follows  the  American 
Ornithologists'  Union  Check-list  (AOU.  1983.  1985).  The 
order  of  species  within  families,  and  alternate  English  names, 
follow  Harrison  (  1985). 

Results 

Forty-six  species  (or  field-recognizable  subspecies)  were 
observed  along  the  14.892-km  cruise  track  of  the  R/V  Akademik 
Korolev  from  15  September  to  31  October  1988  (Figs.  1,2). 
These  were  represented  by  members  ol  1  I  families  of  seabirds 
(including  gulls,  terns,  and  skuas),  shorebirds  (including 
phalaropes),  and  ducks  (Table  3). 

The  most  abundant  species  was  the  sooty  tern  {Sterna 
fusi  ata),  accounting  for  62.8',  of  the  total  number  of  birds 
(Fig.  3),  but  restricted  to  Regions  I  through  IV.  Noddy  tern 
{Anous  sp..  primaril)  brown  noddy, A  vtolidus),  wedge-tailed 
shearwatei  I  Puffinus pacificus),  and  white  tern  followed  as  the 
next  most  frequently  observed  species  We  observed  birds 
belonging  to  the  following  three  broad  groupings  (Fig.  3. 
fable  4  ); 


a)  Resident  breeders.  Seabirds  may  or  may  not  have 
annual  breeding  cycles,  which  affects  the  temporal  patterns  of 
their  dispersion  at-sea.  Within  an  archipelago,  a  species  may 
exhibit  asynchronous  egg-laying  periods  on  different  islands 
or  in  separate  colonies  on  the  same  island.  For  example,  in  the 
Line  Islands,  red-footed  boobies  (Sahi  sulci)  laid  primaril) 

TABLE  2 

Seabtrd  densities  along  the  cruise  track  of  the  R/V  Akademik 
Korolev,  15  September-31  October  1988. 


Region 


Species 


Number  Birds 
Per  Hour        Peril)  Per 

Linear  Km       10  Km3 


Phoenix  petrel 
Tahiti/Phoenix  petrel 
Herald  petrel 
White-necked  petrel 
Cook's  petrel 
Stejneger's  petrel 
Bulwer's  petrel 
Unidentified  petrel 
Flesh-footed  shearwater 
Wedge-tailed  shearwater 
Sooty  shearwatei 
Christmas  shearwater 
Audubon's  shearw  ater 
Unidentified  shearwater 
Unidentified  shearwater/ 

petrel 
Wilson's/Madeiran 

storm-petrel 
Leach's  storm-petrel 
Unidentified  storm-petrel 
Red-tailed  tropicbird 
Masked  booby 
Red-footed  booby 
Brown  hoohy 
Great  frigatebird 
Bristle-thighed  curlew 
Gray-backed  tern 
Soot)  tern 
Brown  noddv 
Black  noddv 

White  tern 
Unidentified  tern 

Phoenix  petrel 
Mottled  petrel 
Herald  petrel 
While  necked  petrel 
Cook's  petrel 
Bulwer's  petrel 
Unidentified  petrel 
Flesh-footed  shearwater 
Short  i.uled  shearwatei 
Wedge  tailed  shearwater 
Soot)  shearwater 
Christmas  shearwatei 
Little  shearwatei 


0.17 
0.03 
0.07 
0.10 
0.20 
0.06 
0.10 
0. 1 7 
0.03 
1.37 
0.50 
0. 1 3 
0.17 
0.10 
0.70 

0.37 


0.07 
0.01 
0.03 
0.04 
0.08 
0.02 
0.04 
0.07 
0.01 
0.53 
0.19 
0.05 
0.07 
0.04 
0.03 

0.14 


0.1  1 

0.03 

0.04 
0.07 
0.13 
0.06 
0.20 
0.11 
0.03 
0.88 
0.32 
0.09 
0.11 
0.07 
0.04 

0.72 


0.03 

0.01 

DOS 

0.17 

0.07 

0.32 

0.13 

0.05 

0.07 

0.80 

0.31 

0.49 

0. 1 3 

0.05 

0.07 

0.07 

0.03 

0.03 

0.17 

0.07 

0.01 

0.13 

0.05 

0.09 

0.07 

0.03 

0.04 

sss 

3.44 

5.73 

0.10 

0.44 

0.07 

0.17 

0.07 

0  1  1 

0.10 

0.04 

0.05 

0.03 

001 

0.03 

0.09 

0.03 

0.05 

Oils 

0.02 

0.03 

0.05 

0.02 

0.03 

0  52 

0.11 

0.17 

0.14 

0.05 

DOS 

0.09 

0.03 

0.16 

000 

0.03 

DOS 

0.05 

0.02 

0.03 

0.05 

0.02 

0.03 

0  52 

0.1 1 

0.17 

0.09 

0.03 

0.05 

0.05 

0.02 

0.03 

0.05 

0.02 

0.03 

228 


TABLE  2  -continued 


TABLE  2  -  continued 


Region 


Species 


Number  Birds 
Per  Hour        Peril)  Per 

Linear  Km       10  Km 


Region  Species 


Audubon's  shearwater 

0.05 

0.02 

0.03 

Unidentified  shearw  ater 

0.09 

0.03 

0.05 

Unidentified  shearwater/ 

0.05 

0.02 

0.03 

petrel 

Leach's  storm-petrel 

0.09 

0.03 

0. 1 6 

White-throated  storm-petrel 

0.09 

0.03 

0.16 

Red-tailed  tropicbird 

0.05 

0.02 

0.02 

Masked  boob) 

0.32 

0.11 

0.13 

Red-footed  boob) 

0.05 

0.02 

0.02 

Great  frigatebird 

0.73 

0.24 

0.30 

Lesser  golden-plover 

0.05 

0.02 

0.08 

Gray-hacked  tern 

3.66 

0.12 

0.20 

Soot)  tern 

77.91 

25.96 

43.27 

Brow  n  noddy 

0.09 

0.03 

0.05 

White  tern 

0.73 

0.24 

0.31 

III   Herald  petrel 

0.56 

0.02 

0.03 

Cook's  petrel 

0.06 

0.02 

0.03 

Bulwer's  petrel 

0.1  1 

0.04 

0.20 

Unidentified  petrel 

0.34 

0.11 

0. 1 8 

Wedge-tai  led  shearwater 

0.50 

0.16 

0.27 

Unidentified  shearwater/ 

0.17 

0.05 

0.09 

petrel 

Leach's  storm-petrel 

0.22 

0.07 

0.36 

Masked  boob) 

0.28 

0.09 

0.11 

Ruddy  turnstone 

0.06 

0.02 

DOS 

South  polar  skua 

0.06 

0.02 

0.03 

Sooty  tern 

7.39 

2.40 

4.00 

Brown  noddy 

13.11 

4.26 

7.09 

Black  noddy 

0.06 

0.02 

0.03 

Unidentified  noddy 

0.17 

0.05 

0.09 

White  tern 

4  94 

1.60 

2.01 

IV  Kermadee  petrel 

0.05 

0.02 

0.03 

Bulwer's  petrel 

0.47 

0.02 

0.80 

Flesh-footed  shearwater 

0.05 

0.02 

0.03 

Wedge-tailed  shearwater 

4.98 

1.76 

2.93 

Unidentified  shearwater/ 

0.14 

0.05 

0.08 

petrel 
Wilson's/Madeiran 

storm-petrel 
White-tailed  tropicbird 
Red-footed  boob) 
Brown  booby 
Great  frigatebird 
Northern  shoveler 
Lesser  golden-plover 
Sharp-tat  led/pectoral 

sandpiper 
South  polar  skua 
Parasitic  jaeger 
Unidentified  skua 
Black-naped  tern 
Sooty  tern 
Brown  noddy 
Unidentified  noddy 
White  tern 


0.02 


0.01 


0.04 


0.91 

0.32 

0.40 

0.84 

0.30 

0.37 

0.05 

0.02 

0.02 

0.02 

0.01 

0.01 

0.02 

0.01 

0.01 

0.05 

0.02 

0.08 

0.12 

0.04 

0.20 

0.09 

0.03 

0.05 

0.05 

0.02 

0.03 

0.14 

0.05 

0.08 

0.02 

0.01 

0.01 

4.70 

1.66 

2.77 

4.21 

0.15 

0.03 

4.68 

1.65 

2.75 

0.87 

0.3 1 

0.38 

V  Streaked  shearwater 
Wedge-tailed  shearwater 
Unidentified  shearwater 
White-tailed  tropicbird 
Lesser  golden-plover 
Black-naped  tern 
White  tern 

VI  Wedge-tailed  shearwater 
Great  frigatebird 
Red-necked  phalarope 
Pomarine  jaeger 
Unidentified  tern 
Unidentified  gull/tern 

VII  Masked  booby 
Brown  booby 
Unidentified  frigatebird 
Red-necked  phalarope 
Pomarine  jaeger 
Parasitic  jaeger 
Unidentified  skua 
Caspian  tern 

Bridled  tern 
Crested  tern 
Unidentified  tern 


Number  Birds 

Per  Hour 

Per  10 

Per 

Linear  Km 

10  Km 

0.44 

0.17 

0.28 

1.53 

0.59 

0.99 

0.07 

0.03 

0.05 

0.15 

0.06 

0.07 

0. 1 5 

0.06 

0.28 

0.07 

0.03 

0.05 

0.07 

0.03 

0.04 

0.14 

0.03 

0.08 

0.07 

0.03 

0.03 

0.76 

0.27 

1.36 

0.07 

0.03 

0.04 

0.07 

0.03 

0.04 

0.14 

0.05 

0.08 

0.05 

0.02 

0.02 

0.25 

0.09 

0.11 

0.98 

0.04 

0.05 

1.61 

0.06 

2.96 

0.10 

0.04 

0.07 

0.15 

0.05 

0.09 

0.29 

0.11 

0.19 

0.25 

0.09 

0. 1 5 

0. 1 5 

0.05 

0.09 

0.10 

0.04 

0.07 

0.25 

0.09 

0. 1 5 

from  May  to  June  on  Christmas  Island  in  1965  (Clapp,  1967) 
but  from  August  to  November  on  Caroline  Atoll  ( Kepler  el  ai. 
Subchapter  1 .2.  this  volume)  data  indicated  an  egg  peak  from 
August  to  November.  Other  species  disperse  variable  distances 
from  their  colonies  during  the  breeding  cycle.  The  case  of 
Audubon's  shearwater  {P.  Iherminierl)  was  particularly 
interesting.  Generally  seen  within  ISO  km  of  its  breeding 
grounds,  we  found  a  bird  1,100  km  away  from  its  nearest 
known  colony.  Christmas  Island,  but  approximately  400  km 
from  Maiden,  a  little-known  island  that  has  unexplored  potential 
habitat  for  Audubon's  shearwaters.  Our  data  also  included 
range  extensions  of  resident  breeders.  Forexample,  the  wedge- 
tailed  shearwater,  the  most  abundant  shearwater  in  the  Pacific. 
has  rarely  been  recorded  west  of  180°  in  the  Caroline  Islands 
(Micronesia).  Philippine  Sea.  and  southeast  Asia,  yet  849!  of 
our  sightings  (N  =  245)  occurred  in  this  area. 

b)  Nonbreeding  visitors.  These  seabirds  tend  to  be  highly 
seasonal  in  their  postbreeding  movements.  We  observed  birds 
that  breed  from  the  arctic  to  the  antarctic.  Forexample.  Cook's 
petrels  {Pterodroma  cooki)  breed  on  islands  in  temperate 
waters  of  the  South  Pacific,  then  undergo  long  transequatorial 
migrations  into  tropical  and  north  temperate  waters  to  spend 
their  austral  w  inter.  Because  of  the  enormous  distances  of  such 
migrations,  and  because  the  distributions  of  birds  are  still 
poorly  known  in  some  regions,  our  data  added  range  extensions 
for  Kermadee  petrel  [P.  neglecta)  and  little  shearwater 
(P.  assimilii  I. 


229 


TABLE  3 


Seabird  abundance  l\\  familj  along  the  cruise  track  of  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev,  15  September-31  Octobei  1988 

Regions 


Famik 

1 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

VII 

Total 

Total  No.  Buds 

457 

1.796 

495 

799 

34 

2(1 

67 

3,668 

No.  Species 

26 

24 

13 

18 

6 

3 

s 

Procellariidae 

117 

35 

22 

243 

28 

2 

- 

447 

I12.11*',  i 

Hydrobatidae 

17 

4 

4 

1 

- 

- 

- 

26 

(0.71',  ) 

Phaethontidae 

4 

1 

- 

39 

2 

- 

- 

46 

(1.2591  I 

Sulidae 

30 

8 

5 

38 

- 

- 

6 

87 

(2.3791 

Fregatidae 

5 

16 

- 

1 

- 

1 

2 

25 

(0.6891  i 

Anatidae 

- 

- 

- 

1 

- 

- 

- 

1 

10.03',  i 

Charadriidae 

- 

1 

- 

2 

2 

- 

- 

5 

iO .14',  I 

Scolopacidae 

4 

- 

1 

5 

- 

- 

- 

1(1 

(0.279!  ) 

Phalaropodidae 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

11 

33 

44 

(1.2091  ' 

Stercorariidae 

- 

- 

1 

12 

- 

1 

11 

25 

(0.6891  i 

Laridae 

280 

1 .73 1 

462 

457 

2 

5 

15 

2.952 

(80  489: 

*  For  geographic 

limits  of  each 

region,  see 

Figs.  1  and 

2. 

TABLE  4 

Seabird  species  abundance  along  the  cruise  track  of  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev, 
15  September-31  October  1988. 


Species 


No.  Birds  Seen 


Total      Status 


Region 


III 


IV 


VI 


VII 


FAMILY  PROCELLARIIDAE 
Phoenix  petrel  {Pterodroma  alba) 
["ahiti/phoenix  petrel  (Pi.  rostrata/alba) 
Mottled  petrel  {Pi  inexpe<  tata) 
Kermadec  petrel  (Pi.  neglecta) 
Herald  petrel  (Pi.  arminjoniana) 
W  hite  necked  petrel  (Pi.  externa) 
Cook's  petrel  (Pi.  cooki) 
Stejneger's  petrel  (Pi.  longirostris) 
Bulwer's  petrel  {Bulweria  bulweri) 
I  indent  1 1  led  petrel 

Sue. iked  shearwater  {Calonectris  leucomelas) 

Flesh  footed  shearwater  {Puffinus  carneipes) 

Wedge  tailed  shearwater  (P.  pacificus) 

Soots  shearwater  (/'.  griseus) 

Short  tailed  shearwater  (P.  tenuirostris) 

Christmas  shearwater  (P.  nativitatis) 

I  .title  shearwater  ( /'.  assimilis  I 

Audubon's  shearwater  (/'.  Ihenninieri  I 

1  Inidentified  shearwater 

i  nidentified  shearwater/petrel 

I  Will  'i   HYDROBATIDAE 

Wilson  s/\  laden  an  storm-petrel 

(0i  eanites  oceanicus/Oceanodroma  castro) 

White  throated  storm-petrel  {Nesofregetta  fuliginosa) 

1  each's  si  Dim  petrel  1 0<  eanodroma  leucorhoa) 

Unidentified  storm-petrel 


2 
3 

1 
7 

1 

6 

3 

1 

2 

3 

2 

2 

5 

2 

6 

1 
41 

1 
7 

9 

15 

2 

4 

1 

5 

1 

3 

2 

21 

1 

3 

113 


3  6 


447 

7 

RB 

1 

RB 

1 

MS 

-i 

WMS 

4 

WMS 

10 

WMS 

10 

WMS 

5 

MS 

27 

RB 

13 

6 

WMN 

4 

MS 

293 

RB 

17 

MS 

1 

MS 

5 

RB 

1 

MS 

6 

RB 

6 

31 

26 


1 

WMS 

2 

RB 

7 

WMN 

5 

230 


TABLE  4  -  continued 


Spe 


No.  Birds  Seen 


Total      Status 


Region 


IV 


VI 


FAMILY  PHAETHONTIDAE 

Red-tailed  tropicbird  {Phaethon  rubricauda) 

White-tailed  tropicbird  [P.  lepturus) 

FAMILY  SULIDAE 
Masked  boob)  (Sula  dactylatra) 
Red-looted  booby  (S.  sula) 
Brown  booby  (5.  leucogaster) 

FAMILY  FREGATIDAE 

Great  frigatebird  (Fregata  minor) 

Unidentified  frigatebird 


24 
4 
2 


16 


39 


36 

2 


46 

5 

RB 

41 

RB 

87 

1 

37 

RB 

41 

RB 

5 

9 

RB 

25 

23 

RB 

T 

■} 

FAMILY  ANATIDAE 

Northern  shoveler  (Anas  rlypeata) 


1 

1       WMN 


FAMILY  CHARADRIIDAE 

Lesser  golden-plover  (Pluvialh  dominica) 

FAMILY  SCOLOPACIDAE 
Bristle-thighed  curlew  (Numenius  tahitiensis) 
Ruddy  turnstone  (Arenaria  interpres) 
Sharp-tailed  pectoral  sandpiper 
[Calidris  acuminata/C.  melanotos) 


5  WMN 

10 

4  WMN 

I  WMN 

5  WMN 


FAMILY  PHALAROPODIDAE 
Red-necked  phalarope  (Phalaropus  lobatus) 

FAMILY  STERCORARIIDAE 
South  polar  skua  (Catharacta  maccormicki) 
Pomarine  jaeger  (Stercorarius  pomarinus ) 
Parasitic  jaeger  (S.  parasiticus) 
Unidentified  skua 

FAMILY  LARIDAE 
Caspian  tern  {.Sterna  caspia) 
Black-naped  tern  (S.  sumatrana) 
Gray-backed  tern  (5.  lunata) 
Bridled  tern  (5.  anaethetus) 
Sooty  tern  (.V.  fuscata) 
Crested  tern  (S.  bergii) 
Brown  noddy  (Anous  stolidus) 
Black  noddy  (A.  minimis) 
Unidentified  noddy 
White  tern  (Gygis  allui) 
Unidentified  tern 
Unidentified  gull 
Unidentified  lurid 


44 


2 

8 

266 

1.705 

133 

201 

3 

2 

236 

18 

5 

1 

3 

200 

3 

1 

16 

89 

37 

31 

44 
25 

WMN 

5 

WMS 

-> 

3 

MN 

3 

5 

MN 

6 

12 
2,952 

5 

5 

MN 

2 

RB 

10 

RB 

3 

3 

RB 

2.305 

RB 

-i 

2 

RB 

254 

RB 

6 

RB 

203 

146 

RB 

5 

7 
2 
2 

65 

3,668 

Totals 


457         1,796 


495 


799 


34 


2(1 


RB    =  resident  breeder  in  the  tropical  Pacific. 

W    =    nonbreeding  visitor 

MS    =  migrant:  south  to  temperate/antarctic  breeding  colonies. 
MN    =  migrant:  north "       "  /arctic 


231 


c)  Direct  migrants.  This  grouping  includes  shorebirds 
( plovers,  sandpipers,  phalaropes )  and  ducks  as  well  as  seabirds. 
They  nunc  quickly  through  tropical  waters  from  wintering 
grounds  further  north  or  south  en  route  to  breeding  areas  in  the 
opposite  hemisphere.  Although  some  follow  general  routes 
and  can  be  predicted  at  certain  times  of  year,  the  overall  dearth 
of  studies  in  certain  portions  of  the  Pacific  leaves  much  to  be 
learned  of  their  at-sea  distribution.  For  example,  Stejneger's 
petrel  (P.  longirostris)  migrates  from  Chile  to  Japan,  yet 
sightings  had  been  scant  in  between  before  this  expedition. 

Species  Accounts 

Family  Procellariidae 

Shearwaters  and  petrels  provided  the  greatest  species 
diversity  (17)  of  any  family.  Seven  breed  and  disperse  within 
the  tropical  Pacific,  1 1  breed  in  the  temperate  South  Pacific  and 
migrate  to  wintering  grounds  in  the  North  Pacific,  and  1  breeds 
in  the  temperate  North  Pacific  and  migrates  south  to  winter 
(Table  4). 

Although  we  did  not  encounter  large  migrating  flocks,  this 
family  ranked  second  in  total  numbers  seen  (447;  Table  3)  and 
was  particularly  abundant  in  Regions  I  and  II  (Line  and 
Phoenix  Islands),  after  which  species  richness  declined  markedly 
to  the  west  (Table  4).  The  western  limit  of  procellariids 
(wedge-tailed  shearwaters)  was  the  Sulu  Sea  (08°47'N, 
121  28'E). 

Densities  of  individual  species  ranged  from  the  rarer 
migrants  at  0.03  birds/10  km2  (Table  2)  to  the  widespread 
resilient  breeder,  wedge-tailed  shearwater,  whose  numbers 
peaked  in  the  Line  Islands  at  0.88  birds/ 1 0  km2.  Several  species 
contributed  to  feeding  flocks  (Table  5 ).  accounting  for  10%  of 
their  participants. 

Phoenix  Petrel  (Pterodroma  alba):  All  seven  of  this 
rather  uncommon  species  were  sighted  in  Regions  II  and  III. 
within  its  relatively  small  range  in  the  central  Pacific.  Phoenix 
petrels  sighted  in  the  Line  Islands  were  either  within  1 .200  km 
of  their  breeding  grounds  at  Christmas  Island  or  flying  west 
toward  colonies  in  the  Phoenix  Islands.  Their  highest  densities 
were  in  the  Line  Islands  (0.1  1/10  km2).  None  associated  with 
other  birds  or  participated  in  feeding  flocks. 

Tahiti/Phoenix  Petrel  (Pterodroma  roM  rata  or  alba):  One 
Pterodroma  found  slightly  east  of  Maiden  Island  (central  Line 
Islands i  was  either  a  Tahiti  or  a  Phoenix  petrel,  look-alikes 
difficull  to  distinguish  in  the  field.  Tahiti  petrels  breed  in  the 
Society  and  Marquesas  Islands.  800  km  and  1.670  km. 
respectively,  from  its  observed  position. 

Mottled  Petrel  (Pterodroma  inexpcciata):  A  single  bird 
was  seen  flying  southeast  near  Birnie  Island  (Phoenix  Group) 
on  4  October.  This  species  breeds  in  New  Zealand  during  the 
austral  summer,  so  this  individual  was  likely  migrating  south 
from  its  winter  quarters  in  the  North  Pacific.  Its  density  in 
Region  II  was  0.03/10  km 

Kermadec  Petrel  (Plerodroma  ne v lee la):  The  Kermadec 
petrel  breeds  in  several  island  groups  just  south  of  the  Tropic 
ol  Capricorn  from  Lord  Howe  Island  to  the  coast  of  Chile. 
Formerly  considered  sedentary,  recent  records  indicate  thai  it 
ranges  widely  into  the  North  Pacific  (Gould  iV'  King.  1967: 


Amerson,  1969;  Harrison.  1985;  Bailey  et al.,  1989).  Several 
records  exist  for  the  area  extending  from  just  south  of  Hawaii 
to  the  Marshall  and  Phoenix  Groups.  An  old  record  from  Duke- 
of-York  Island  (Bismarck  Archipelago)  indicates  that  this 
species  may  also  occasionally  straggle  almost  to  New  Guinea 
(King,  1970). 

Kermadec  petrels  are  not  listed  for  the  Gilbert  Islands 
(Amerson,  1969)  nor  for  any  of  the  Caroline  Islands  (Pratt 
et  al..  1987):  hence,  the  following  observations  extend  the 
known  range  for  this  species:  2  Kermadec  petrels  ( 1  light  and 
1  dark  phase)  were  seen  on  the  morning  of  1 2  October  at  the  far 
eastern  edge  of  Micronesia  (04°03'N.  163°30'E).  approximately 
157  km  south  of  Kosrae.  The  dark-phase  petrel  was  flying 
directly  south,  while  the  light-phase  bird  had  joined  a  feeding 
(lock  of  over  200  sooty  terns  mingled  with  small  numbers  of 
wedge-tailed  shearwaters.  Bulwer's  petrels  anil  south  polar 
skuas (Catharacta maccormicki).  Kermadec  petrels  were  seen 
only  in  Region  IV  with  a  density  of  0.03/10  km2. 

Herald  Petrel  (Plerodroma  arminioniana):  The  Pacific- 
breeding  range  of  this  medium-sized  gadfly  petrel  includes 
Easter  Island,  the  Pitcairn  Islands,  Tuamotus.  Marquesas. 
Gambiers,  and,  further  west.  Tonga  and  Chesterfield  (Coral 
Sea).  In  the  nonbreeding  season,  herald  petrels  remain  primarily 
in  the  Southern  Hemisphere,  occasionally  wandering  north  of 
the  equator  (Harrison.  1985;  Bailey  etal..  1989  (where  they  are 
typically  observed  more  than  150  km  from  land  (King.  1970). 
We  observed  four  adults  (three  dark  phase,  one  light)  in  the 
Line,  Phoenix,  and  Gilbert  Groups.  Two  occurred  just  outside, 
the  others  within,  the  known  pelagic  range  of  this  species 
(Harrison.  1985).  The  two  dark-phase  birds,  beyond  the 
eastern  borders  of  their  known  range  (05°24'N.  156o60'W), 
were  flying  southwest  on  2  October  (ca.  380  km  east  of 
Washington  Island.  Line  Group).  Densities  were  highest  in  the 
Line  Islands  (0.04/10  km2).  Three  of  the  birds  were  Hying 
directly  southwest. 

White-necked  Petrel  ( Pterodroma  externa)  ( includes  both 
P.  e.  externa  and  P.  e.  cervicalis):  We  observed  10  of  these 
gadfly  petrels:  3  occurred  in  September  and  October  within 
their  main  wintering  grounds  in  the  central  Pacific  between  the 
equator  and  Hawaii  (0.07/10  km2),  and  7  spanned  the  Phoenix 
Group,  where  densities  were  highest  (0. 1  7/10  km2).  They  are 
known  to  be  abundanl  in  (he  former  location  from  May  to 
November  ( King.  1 967 ). 

There  are  two  subspecies  that  breed  on  opposite  sides  of 
the  temperate  Pacific;  the  white-necked  {externa)  in  the 
Kermadec  Islands  northeast  of  New  Zealand,  and  the  Juan 
Fernandez  (cervicalis)  in  the  Juan  Fernandez  Islands  of  Chile. 
Seven  birds  were  flv  ing  south  or  southwest  I  four  Hew  together), 
presumably  returning  to  breed  on  southern  temperate  islands 
during  the  austral  summer. 

Cook's  Petrel  (Pterodroma  cooki):  Cook's  petrel  breeds 
m  the  austral  summer  in  New  Zealand  and  the  Juan  Fernandez 
Islands.  Although  this  iransequatonal  migrant  ranges  widelj 
between  the  south  and  north  temperate  Pacific  as  tar  as  the 
Aleutian  Islands,  its  pelagic  movements  are  not  fully  understood, 
lew  records  exist  from  the  central  Pacific.  There  are  two 
records  from  the  Phoenix  Islands  and  sightings  near  the  Hawaiian 
Islands  in  (he  northern  spring  (King,  1967;  Harrison.  1985: 


232 


TABLE  5 

Geographic  Distribution  of  Flocks.  "No.  Birds"  refers  to  the  number  of  each  species  present  in  all 

feeding  (locks  of  each  region.  Species  are  arranged  according  to  their  overall  relative  abundance  in  all 

feedinc  flocks.  No  flocks  were  seen  in  Regions  V-VI1. 


Species 


Region 


111 


IV 


Flocks 


No. 
Birds 


Flocks 


No. 
Buds 


Flocks 


No. 
Birds 


Flocks 


No. 
Birds 


Sooty  tern 
Noddy  sp. 

Wedge-tailed  shearwater 
Brown  noddy 
White  tern 
Red-footed  booby 
Great  frigatebird 
White-tailed  tropicbird 
Masked  booby 
South  polar  skua 
Stercorariid  sp. 
Audubon's  shearwater 
Bulwer's  petrel 
Kermadec  petrel 
"Shearwater/petrel" 


85 


6 

1.074 

2 

108 

1 
1 

200 
200 

1 

1 

3 

189 

1 

2 

3 

III 

3 

6 

4 

20 

1 

18 

1 

1 

1 

30 

2 

7 

1 

4 

1 

3 

1 

2 

1 

1 

1 
1 

1 

1 

1 
5 

Totals 


85 


1 .095 


239 


651 


Pratt  el  al.,  1987).  They  have  not  been  previously  recorded 
from  the  Gilbert  Islands  (Amerson,  1969).  Our  records  are  as 
follows: 

Line  Islands.  Single  birds  were  seen  on  15  September  at 
10°38'N.  156°16'W;  10°13'N.  156°19'W  (Hying  north): 
09°29'N.  156°26"W  (with  2  Bulwer's  petrels);  16Septemberat 
06°16'N.  156°50'W  (flying  north):  04°55'N.  157°00'W  (flying 
south):  and  on  19  September  at  00°22'S.  156°37'W. 

Phoenix  Islands.  All  single  birds  flying  south,  as  follows: 
2  October  at  06°29'S,  162°19'W;  3  October  at  05°16'S. 
166o53'Wand05o12'S.  167°06'W. 

Gilbert  Islands.  One  bird  flying  southeast  on  7  October  at 
00°49'S.  179°10'E. 

We  observed  12  adults  (10  on  transect)  between 
15  September  and  7  October  1988.  Two  had  particularly  pale 
plumage.  Sightings  occurred  just  north  of  and  within  the 
Northern  Line  Group,  where  densities  were  highest 
(0.13/10  km2),  in  the  Phoenix  Group,  and  east  of  the  Gilbert 
Islands.  Of  seven  birds  flying  in  a  direct  compass  direction, 
four  from  the  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands  were  flying  south,  and 
one  from  the  Gilbert  Islands  was  flying  southeast.  Thus  71% 
of  individuals  of  this  species  were  flying  in  the  approximate 
direction  of  their  New  Zealand  breeding  grounds,  when  such 
movements  are  expected.  Only  one  Cook"  s  petrel  was  associated 
with  other  birds  (two  Bulwer's  petrels). 

Stejneger's  Petrel  {PterodromalonvirostrisY.  We  observed 
two  adult  Stejneger's  petrels  in  the  Northern  Line  Group 


(05°56'N,  156°53'W;  06°24'N.  156°50'W)  on  16  September 
1988,  about  170  km  east  of  Palmyra  Atoll.  There  are  few 
central  Pacific  records;  POBSP  personnel  saw  some  near  the 
Phoenix  Islands  (King.  1967).  although  this  is  not  mapped  in 
Harrison  ( 1985).  There  appear  to  be  no  records  of  Stejneger's 
petrel  between  Hawaii  and  the  Phoenix  Islands. 

Additional  sightings  were  made  during  the  ICBP  1990 
Line  and  Phoenix  Islands  Expedition  (ICBP.  1990;  Kepler, 
1990).  We  observed  no  Stejneger's  petrels  in  the  Line  Islands 
during  March  and  April  but  saw  several  birds  heading  north  in 
the  same  area  during  May  ( 1 1°  to  15°S,  149°  to  15 1°W). 

Bulwer's  Petrel  (Bulweria  hulueri):  This  species  was 
relatively  common  ( N  =  27 )  throughout  the  four  regions  of  the 
Pacific  covered  by  the  cruise.  Because  of  its  small  size,  it  was 
only  counted  within  1 00  m  of  the  ship  ( see  Methods).  Since  this 
species  breeds  and  ranges  at  widely-scattered  locations  in  the 
Central  and  western  Pacific,  all  our  observations  fell  within  its 
expected  range.  Regions  I  through  IV.  Three-quarters  of  our 
sightings  were  in  Micronesia,  primarily  south  of  Kosrae  and 
north  of  Ulithi  Atoll.  None  were  seen  west  of  Yap  (139°E). 
The  major  Bulwer's  petrel  breeding  grounds  in  the  northwest 
Pacific  (Bonin,  Volcano,  islands  of  Taiwan  and  China)  are  well 
north  of  Micronesia,  and  Bulwer's  petrel  is  regarded  as  a 
species  whose  numbers  decrease  gradually  with  increasing 
distance  from  land  ( King,  1970).  Breeding  occurs  from  April 
to  September  (King,  1967).  Of  our  early  October  birds,  equal 
numbers  were  heading  either  north  or  south. 


233 


The  overall  density  of  Bulwer's  petrel  in  Micronesia  was 
0.80/10  km2,  lour  times  the  density  encountered  in  Regions  I 
through  III  (Line.  Phoenix  and  Gilbert  Islandsi. 

Streaked  Shearwater  (CalonectrisleucomelusY.  This  large 
shearwater  breeds  on  coastal  islands  off  China,  Japan  and 
Korea  and  is  known  to  travel  southward  during  October  and 
November  toward  its  main  wintering  area  in  the  New  Guinea- 
northern  Australia  area.  We  observed  six  individuals,  all  from 
18-20  October  in  the  far  western  Pacific  close  to  the  Philippines 
(Region  V).  Two  were  recorded  as  having  darker  plumage. 
Sightings  were  restricted  to  a  very  narrow  band  of  ocean 
between  130°15'and  1 35°  14'E  longitude.  These  were  probably 
postbreeding  migrants:  three  ( 50% )  were  flying  due  south,  and 
all  were  solitary. 

Flesh-footed  Shearwater  (Puft'iniis  carncipes):  Flesh- 
footed  shearwaters  breed  during  the  austral  summer  on  islands 
off  Australia  and  New  Zealand,  and  winter  in  the  North  Pacific 
north  of  the  subtropical  convergence.  We  observed  four  flesh- 
footed  shearwaters  in  Regions  I.  II  and  IV.  all  migrating  birds 
returning  to  the  south  temperate  Pacific  to  breed.  Two  were  in 
the  central  Pacific  south  of  Hawaii  and  in  the  Phoenix  Islands, 
where  the  species  has  been  reported  in  very  small  but  regular 
numbers  during  the  migration  months.  October  to  April  ( King, 
1967).  The  rest  occurred  in  a  more  expected  sector  of  the 
western  Pacific,  although  in  a  relatively  narrow  swath  (05°  1 2'S 
to  03°59'N,  164°08'E  to  163°46'E),  viz.  between  the  western 
Gilbert  and  far  eastern  Caroline  Islands.  The  densities  of  these 
transequatorial  migrants  were  equal  throughout  (0.03/ 10  knr). 

Wedge-tailed  Shearwater  ( Pitffimts pucitlcus ):  The  wedge- 
tailed  shearwater  has  long  been  considered  the  most  common 
widespread  shearwater  of  the  southwest  Pacific  (Mayr,  1945; 
Jenkins,  1979).  This  species  accounted  for  8%  of  our  total 
sightings  (Fig.  4).  It  breeds  on  numerous  islands  throughout 
most  of  the  tropical  and  subtropical  Pacific  from  eastern 
Australia  to  Mexico  south  to  the  Pitcairn  Islands.  We  observed 
293  individuals,  213  (73%)  of  which  occurred  in  Micronesia. 
The  two  largest  concentrations,  of  150  and  22  birds,  both 
occurred  on  13  October  near  Pohnpei.  Our  sightings  ranged 
from  immediately  south  of  Hawaii  through  the  Line.  Phoenix, 
and  Gilbert  Islands,  Micronesia,  and  the  Philippine  Islands  to 
the  far  western  edge  of  its  range  at  121°28'E  longitude. 

Although  the  pelagic  distribution  of  this  species  is  well 
known  for  the  central  and  eastern  Pacific  regions  and  Marshall 
Islands  (King,  1967. 1970. 1974b;  Amerson,  1969),  observations 
are  surprisingly  scarce  in  the  Carolines-Belau-Philippine region 
( King,  I974b;63.  93).  For  this  reason,  we  discuss  our  records 
in  waters  west  of  180'  longitude  (Table  6).  where  84'  i 
(N  =  245)  of  our  wedge-tail  sightings  occurred: 

a)  Gilbert  Islands  (Region  III.  IS0-165°E).  Although 
wedge-tailed  shearwaters  are  known  from  this  area  ( I  larrison, 
19X5).  we  have  been  unable  to  find  records  of  specific  sightings 
in  a  detailed  summary  of  published  data  on  wedge-tailed 
shearwater  distribution  (King,  1974b).  They  are  not  listed, 
even  as  visitors,  in  the  Gilbert  Islands  by  Pratt  el  id.  (  1987)  or 
Amerson  (  1969). 


Fig.  4.  Relative  abundance  of  species  or  species  groups  on  the  cruise  track  of 
the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev.  Total  number  of  birds  seen  was  3.6hS. 
belonging  to  1 1  different  families. 

Although  a  resident  breeder  on  several  of  the  northern 
Marshall  Islands  (Amerson,  1969),  the  closest  recorded  sightings 
to  the  Gilbert  Islands  are  10  dark-phase  birds  seen  on 
2  November  1960  at  Jaluit  Atoll,  southern  Marshall  Islands 
(Morzer  Bruyns,  1965:58)  and  between  04°00'  and  02°30'S, 
169-155°E  in  October  1951  southwest  of  the  Gilberts  between 
Niutao  Atoll  and  the  Admiralty  Islands  ( Mac  Donald  &  Lawford, 
1954).  These  latter  birds  were  reported  as  possibly  P.  came  i pes. 
which  has  a  totally  different  flight  pattern.  Our  nine  sightings 
were  close  to  the  equator  at  179°E  longitude,  approximately 
300  km  north-northeast  of  Arorae  Island.  All  birds  were  flying 
south. 

b)  Micronesia  (Region  IV,  165-136°E).  Although  known 
to  be  resident  breeders  in  the  northern  Marshall  Islands 
( Amerson,  1 969:295 )  and  central  Carolines  ( Murphy.  1951:9), 
pelagic  records  of  wedge-tails  are  sparse  (King.  1974b:93). 
Breeding  colonies  are  also  difficult  to  locate.  Prattefa/.  ( 1987) 
state  that  this  species  is  rare  in  western  Micronesia:  the 
westernmost  record  at  these  latitudes  i s  evidently  1 50°E  ( District 
ofTruk). 

We  observed  wedge-tailed  shearwaters  (N  =  213) 
throughout  the  Caroline  chain  of  islands  east  to  I32°59'E 
longitude:  73' ;  of  wedge-tails  observed  on  our  cruise  were  in 
this  region. 

c)  Philippine  Sea  and  Basin  (Region  V.  136-125  Fl.  Of 
21  wedge-tailed  shearwaters  seen  west  of  150°E  (east  of  the 
Philippines  and  ca.  450  km  north  of  Belau).  all  were  dark  phase 
(Table  6).  Those  in  direct  flight  were  heading  either  south  or 
west.  This  species  mas  visit  Belau  more  frequently  than 
records  indicate.  ( )w  en  ( 197 1 )  does  not  mention  its  occurrence, 
although  Pratt  ei  id.  listed  it  as  a  visitor.  The  overall  density  of 


234 


wedge-tails  in  this  area,  generally  depauperate  in  seabirds,  was 
0.99  birds/10  km2,  far  higher  than  for  any  of  the  other  five 
species  seen  there. 

d)  Philippine  Islands  (Region  VI.  125-1 17°E  longitude). 
Our  October  observations  confirm  the  presence  of  this  species 
in  the  Sulu  Sea  (Delacour  &  Mayr,  1946;  MacDonald  & 
Law  ford.  1954).  where  we  saw  two  dark-phase  adults  flying 
south  (0.08/10  knr). 

e)  Color  Morphs.  Flight  Directions,  and  Densities.  Pacific 
Ocean  Biological  Survey  Program  studies  revealed  much  about 
the  migratory  movements  of  the  wedge-tailed  shearwater  in  the 
central  and  eastern  Pacific  (King.  1967.  1970.  1974b).  In 
general,  the  dark-phase  population  predominates  south  of 
10°N  latitude,  the  approximate  area  covered  by  the  east- 
flowing  Equatorial  Countercurrent  and  west-flowing  South 


Equatorial  Current.  Dark-phase  birds  move  northward 
following  the  currents  during  the  northern  summer,  reversing 
their  movements  in  the  fall. 

Dark-phase  birds  observed  during  October  would 
be  expected  to  be  heading  south:  of  39  individuals  of  known 
flight  direction.  31  flew  south  and  4  southwest,  toward 
the  nutrient-rich  waters  of  the  Equatorial  Countercurrent 
upwelling  between  4°N  and  9°N  latitude  (King,  1974a,b). 
Our  largest  concentration  of  wedge-tails  was  near  Pohnpei 
(06°N,  157°E),  contributing  to  the  highest  daily  density 
of  this  species  (10.95  birds/10  km:).  At  this  time  the  sea 
was  "boiling"  with  fish,  which  attracted  a  great  variety  of 
seabirds.  Such  densities  of  Wedge-tails  are  comparable  to 
those  within  the  countercurrent  latitudes  in  the  central  Pacific 
(King,  1974a). 


TABLE  6 

Distribution,  abundance,  and  behavior  of  wedge-tailed  shearwaters  west  of  180° 

7  October-23  October  1988. 


Pacific  Ocean  and  inland  Philippine  Seas, 


Overall 

Nearest 

Density 

Location 

Island 

No. 

(birds  per 

Flight 

Reg 

ion             Lat. 

Long. 

Date 

or  Group 

Birds 

10  knr) 

Phase 

Behavior             Direction 

III 

01°00'S-02°55'N 

180°00'-165°00'E 

10/7-10/11 

Gilberts 

9 

0.27 

00°49'S 

179°10'E 

10/7 

Arorae 

8 

- 

Directed  flight 

S 

00°49'S 

179°10'E 

" 

1 

- 

S 

IV 

02°55'N-11°10'N 

165°00'-136°00E 

10/11- 

10/17 

Micronesia 

213 

2.93 

03°53'N 

I64°08E 

10/12 

Kosrae 

1 
1 

Dark 

Directed  flight 

S 

04°03'N 

163°31E 

" 

" 

1 

17 

1 

■• 

Feeding  flock 
Directed  flight 

N 

04°30'N 

161°57'E 

.. 

.. 

7 

1 

- 

» 

S 

NE 

05°24'N 

159°04'E 

10/13 

Pohnpei 

2 

Dark 

Solo  feeding 

- 

05°32'N 

158°37'E 

" 

" 

1 

- 

Flushed  by  ship 

- 

05°43'N 

158°25E 

22 

- 

Feeding  flock  with 
I  South  Polar  Skua 

- 

06°02'N 

158°06E 

" 

" 

1 

- 

Directed  flight 

NE 

06  I7'N 

157°51'E 

(in  sight) 

150 

- 

Feeding  flock:  7  spp 
408  birds 

,     - 

06°28'N 

157°41E 

" 

" 

1 

2 
2 

Dark 

Directed  flight 

S 

sw 
s 

06°38'N 

157°31E 

" 

" 

2 

" 

" 

sw 

08°59'N 

155°  HE 

10/14 

Murilo 
(Hall  Is.) 

1 

s 

V 

ll°10'-10°00'N 

136°00'-125o00'E 

Yap,  Belau 

21 

0.99 

11°02'N 

135°19'E 

10/18 

120  km  NW  of  Yap, 

2 

Dark 

Directed  flight 

s 

400 

1  1   00'N 

1 34°36'E 

- 

Belau 

1 

2 

1 
1 

" 

" 

s 

w 
s 

1  1  :'0()'N 

132°59'E 

10/19 

3 
10 

Circling 

w 

1  l°00'N 

132'59'E 

10/19 

Belau 

1 

0.99 

Dark 

Directed  flight 

s 

VI 

10  OO'N 

I25C00'-117°00E 

Philippines 
(Sulu  Sea) 

2 

0.08 

08°49' 

1 2 1  °44' 

10/22 

Negros.  Mindanao 

1 

Dark 

Directed  flight 

s 

08°47' 

121°28' 

1 

s 

235 


Dark-phase  birds  accounted  for  979?  of  sightings  where 
color  phase  was  noted  (57).  Only  two  light-phase  individuals 
were  seen  (Region  1.  10°46'N  and  ()6°45'N),  both  south  of 
Hawaii,  where  the  majority  of  the  population  is  light  phased. 

Short-tailed  Shearwater  {Puffinus  tenuimstris):  A  wide- 
ranging  transequatorial  migrant,  with  movements  and  breeding 
phenology  similar  to  those  of  the  flesh-footed  and  sooty 
shearwaters  (P.  griseus),  this  species  breeds  off  southeastern 
Australia  and  winters  off  the  west  coast  of  North  America  and 
the  Bering  Sea.  We  observed  one  adult  (2  October)  heading 
south  through  the  eastern  extremity  of  its  known  migratory 
pathway,  the  eastern  Phoenix  Islands  (06°29'S,  162°19'W). 

Sooty  Shearwater  (Puffinus  griseus):  Sooty  shearwaters 
arc  wide-ranging,  transequatorial  migrants  that  breed  from 
October  to  May  in  the  Southern  Hemisphere  on  islands  off 
Australia.  New  Zealand,  and  Chile,  migrating  to  equivalent 
high  latitudes  in  the  northern  Pacific  during  the  nonbreeding 
season.  We  observed  very  small  numbers  of  birds  on  their 
annual  southward  migration.  All  17  observations  were  in  the 
south-central  Pacific.  We  saw  them  on  only  2  days: 
16  September  (N  =  15).  east  of  Washington  Island  (Line 
Group)  and  2  October  (N  =  2),  between  Sydney  and  Starbuck 
Islands  (east  of  the  Phoenix  Group).  All  were  adults 
Hying  south,  and  none  were  feeding  or  associated  with  other 
species.  Densities  were  0.32  birds/ 10  km:  in  Region  I  and 
0.05  birds/10  km2  in  Region  II.  Enormous  flocks  of  migrants 
have  been  encountered  in  this  area  ( King,  1 967:  CBK.  personal 
observation). 

Christmas  Shearwater  (Puffinus  ncitivitatis):  The  Christmas 
shearwater,  a  year-round  resident  in  the  tropical  Pacific,  tends 
to  remain  fairly  close  to  its  breeding  grounds  all  year,  although 
it  is  generally  seen  more  than  180  km  from  land  (King.  1970). 
We  observed  four  individuals  in  the  Line  Islands  (05°N, 
157°W)  that  were  Hying  west,  and  a  single  bird  in  the  Phoenix 
Group,  flying  north.  Densities  were  low:  0.09  birds/10  km2 
(Line  Islands)  and  0.03  birds/10  km2  (Phoenix  Islands). 

Little  Shearwater  (Puffinus  assiniilis):  This  small, 
distinctive  "aukish"  shearwater  breeds  and  disperses  within 
south  temperate  waters,  generally  only  occurring  at-sea  north 
to  25°S  latitude.  However,  its  pelagic  dispersal  is  not  well 
known  and  wanderers  have  been  recorded  near  the  Marquesas, 
Marshall,  and  Hawaiian  Islands  (King.  1967).  Clapp  ( 1967) 
listed  a  doubtful  record  from  Christmas  Island  in  the  late 
I950's.  We  add  a  single  straggler,  seen  on  4  October  in  the 
Phoenix  Islands  (03  59'S,  171°31'W)  close  to  Birnie  Island 
and  Hying  north.  Within  20  minutes,  we  also  observed  the 
similar  Audubon's  shearwater:  both  flew  close  to  the  ship, 
enabling  us  to  compare  si/e,  bill  length,  and  the  degree  of  white 
present  on  the  underw  ings. 

Audubon's  Shearwater  (Puffinus  Ihcnninicri):  This  small 
shearwater  is  resident  in  the  central  and  western  Pacific:  our 
five  sightings  ( Regions  I  and  II )  were  within  its  known  range. 

Our  sightings  of  Audubon's  shearwater  at  02°N.  157  W 
were  evidently  from  adjacent  colonies  on  Christmas  Island. 
However,  we  saw  two  birds  flying  northwest  in  the  Southern 
I  ine  Islands  (06  32'S,  I52°35'W)  on  21  September  1988, 
approximately  1. 1 00  km  from  Christmas  Island  and  more  than 
1,800  km  from  Phoenix  Island,  the  nearest  known  colonics 


(Clapp.  1967;  Stoddart.  1976:  Garnett.  1983).  Since  this 
species  usually  ranges  at  sea  within  180  km  of  its  breeding 
islands  (King.  1967).  we  speculate  that  an  unknown  colony  lies 
w  ithin  the  Southern  Line  Islands.  Maiden  Island,  approximately 
400  km  distant  from  the  Audubon's  shearwaters  in  question,  is 
a  likely  possibility.  Little  visited  by  biologists,  approximately 
one-third  of  its  interior  is  covered  by  a  landlocked,  supersaline 
lagoon  with  subterranean  connections  to  the  sea,  containing  a 
maze  of  interconnected  islets  and  salt  flats  (Garnett.  1983; 
RNZAF.  1986).  These  islets  have  never  been  surveyed  by 
ornithologists  (R.B.  Clapp.  personal  communication).  They 
provide  potential  habitat  for  Audubon's  shearwaters,  since 
they  resemble  sites  occupied  by  this  species  on  Christmas 
Island.  Bloxham  ( 1925)  recorded  two  species  of  shearwaters 
of  unknown  identity  on  Maiden:  Garnett  ( 1983)  proposes  that 
one  of  them  may  have  been  Audubon's  shearwater.  Starbuck. 
another  stark,  arid  guano  island  with  a  similar  interior,  is 
another  probable  source. 

On  5  May  1990.  a  single  Audubon's  shearwater  was 
observed  flying  north-northwest  around  10°S,  155°W, 
approximately  640  km  due  south  of  Maiden  (ICBP.  1990). 
further  suggesting  the  presence  of  a  colony  in  the  Southern 
Line  Islands. 

In  Region  II,  we  saw  one  Audubon's  shearwater  in  a 
feeding  flock  at  03D57'S.  171°31'W.  near  a  large  breeding 
colony  (ca.  12.000  birds)  on  Phoenix  Island  (Garnett.  1983). 

Family  Hydrobatidae 

The  storm-petrels  were  represented  by  three  (possibly 
four)  species  (Table  4)  and  five  unidentified  individuals. 
Small  numbers  (N  =  26)  were  present  at  sea  from  the  Line 
Islands  west  to  Micronesia.  Wilson' s/Madeiran  storm-petrel 
in  the  Line  Islands  accounted  for  the  greatest  densities 
(0.72  birds/  10km:).  Overall,  storm-petrels  accounted  for().7'< 
of  the  total  number  of  birds  on  the  cruise  (Fig.  4).  Typically 
solitary  feeders,  they  never  participated  in  feeding  flocks.  Our 
westernmost  observation  was  of  a  Wilson' s/Madeiran  storm- 
petrel  at  03°59'N,  163°45'E  (south  of  Kosrae). 

Wilson'  sSiorm-PelvcliOcecinitesoceiiniats)  and  Madeiran 
(Harcourt's)  Storm-Petrel  (Oceanodronui  custro):  Wilson's 
storm-petrel  breeds  on  subantarctic  islands  off  South  America 
and  in  Antarctica  and  ranges  widely  throughout  all  the  world's 
oceans  (Murphy.  1936:  Murphy  &  Snyder.  1952).  In  the 
Pacific  it  migrates  northward  to  wintering  grounds  within 
tropical  and  north  temperate  waters  (Harrison.  1985).  It  is 
rarely  seen  in  the  Pacific  except  in  the  far  east  (King.  1967; 
Huber.  1971;Crossin,  1974).  Records  and  sightings  exist  from 
the  Marshall  Islands.  Solomons.  New  Hebrides.  New  Caledonia, 
waters  close  to  Hawaii,  the  Phoenix  Islands,  and  Christmas 
Island. 

The  Madeiran  storm-petrel,  although  not  congeneric  with 
Wilson's,  appears  remarkably  similar  in  the  field.  It  is  a 
resident  breeder  in  the  tropical  Pacific:  therefore,  its  dispersal 
range  overlaps  with  the  wintering  areas  of  Wilson's,  primarily 
west  of  the  international  date  line. 

Eleven  Wilson/Madeiran  storm-petrels  were  observed  at 
00°28'S,  156°32'W,  east  of  Jarvis  Island.  Hying  southeast.  A 
Wilson's,   flying  south,   was   located  southeast  of  Kosrae 


236 


(04°03'N,  163°31'E).  Huber  ( 1971 )  has  shown  that  Wilson's 
storm-petrels  move  through  the  Marshall  Islands  from  April 
through  September,  sometimes  in  considerable  numbers. 

White-throated  or  Polynesian  Storm-Petrel  (Ncsotrcuetta 
titliaiiiosa):  The  white-throated  storm-petrel  is  an  uncommon 
central  Pacific  resident.  We  saw  two  (0. 1 6  birds/ 1 0  knr )  flying 
north  on  5  October  in  the  Phoenix  Islands,  200  km  northwest 
of  the  nearest  land.  McKean  Island,  where  the  world's  largest 
population!  1.000  birds)  breeds  (King.  1973).  Approximately 
500  birds  also  breed  on  nearby  Phoenix  Island,  remaining  in 
adjacent  waters  throughout  the  year,  with  limited  dispersal 
eastward  along  the  South  Equatorial  Current  ( Harrison,  1 985 ). 

Leach's  Storm-Petrel  (Oceanodroma  leucorhoa):  This 
species  breeds  at  subarctic  and  temperate  latitudes  in  the  North 
Pacific,  wintering  primarily  north  of  the  equator.  Its  at-sea 
range  is  centered  in  the  central  Pacific,  with  greatest  winter 
densities  in  a  broad  belt  along  the  equator  (Crossin,  1974).  Our 
seven  observations,  all  between  0  and  3°S  latitude,  fell  within 
the  known  range  of  the  species  (i.e.,  the  Line,  Phoenix,  and 
Gilbert  Groups).  Five  were  flying  north,  and  two  were  flying 
southeast. 

Family  Phaethontidae 

Tropicbirds  were  represented  by  two  species  observed  in 
small  numbers  (N  =  46)  from  the  Line  Islands  west  to  the 
Carolines,  including  the  Gilbert  Islands.  Most  sightings  were 
of  solitary  birds  during  the  morning  hours,  up  to  300  km 
from  the  nearest  landfall.  The  highest  density  was  that  of  the 
white-tailed  tropicbird  {Phaethon  leptums)  in  Micronesia 
( 0.40  birds/ 1 0  km: ),  six  times  higher  than  elsewhere.  Tropicbirds 
accounted  for  1.3%  of  the  total  birds  seen  (Fig.  3,  Table  3). 

Red-tailed  Tropicbird  (Phaethon  rubricatuhi):  The  red- 
tailed  tropicbird  ranges  widely  in  the  tropical  and  subtropical 
Pacific,  breeding  on  many  islands.  Typically  solitary,  it  is 
highly  pelagic  and  is  often  observed  many  hundreds  of 
kilometers  from  the  nearest  landfall  (Harrison,  1985).  Long- 
term  studies  have  found  that  it  is  observed  in  roughly  the  same 
density  regardless  of  distance  from  land  (King,  1970). 

We  observed  five  individuals  in  Regions  I  and  II  between 
1 7  September  and  5  October.  In  the  Line  Islands,  two  occurred 
close  to  islands  (Christmas.  Maiden).  The  remainder  were 
approximately  300  km  equidistant  from  Caroline,  Maiden,  and 
Starbuck.  all  of  which  harbor  small  breeding  colonies  (Clapp, 
1967;  Gould  el  al.,  1974).  although  that  on  Caroline  is  the 
largest  ( Kepler  et  al. .  Subchapter  1 .2,  this  vol.).  All  birds  were 
characteristically  solitary;  one  was  resting  on  the  water.  This 
was  also  found  by  POBSP,  whose  number  of  sightings  exceeded 
one  thousand:  87%  of  sightings  were  of  lone  birds,  and  14% 
were  sitting  on  the  water  (Gould  et  al..  1974).  Pacific  Ocean 
Biological  Survey  Program  found  that  birds  were  most 
commonly  observed  during  morning  hours:  80%  of  our  birds 
were  seen  before  0820  h.  All  flying  birds  were  adults  flying 
south.  One  bird  was  observed  in  the  Phoenix  Islands 
approximately  300  km  northwest  of  McKean  Island,  where 
some  500  breed  (Gould  et  al..  1974). 


Densities  were  highest  in  the  Line  Islands 
(0.07  birds/10  knr).  Such  at-sea  abundance  is  low,  probably 
because  the  species  was  breeding.  On  Caroline  Atoll,  for 
example,  eggs  and  chicks  were  present  in  late  September 
(Kepler  et  al.,  Subchapter  1 .2.  this  vol.). 

White-tailed  Tropicbird  (Phaethon  leptums):  Like 
P.  rubricauda,  the  white-tailed  tropicbird  is  a  resident  breeder 
throughout  the  tropical  Pacific.  It  is.  however,  less  pelagic.  Of 
the  41  individuals  we  observed,  38  were  seen  on  13  October, 
with  Pohnpei  in  sight  most  of  the  day:  most  were  alone  or  in 
groups  of  up  to  four  or  fewer.  Maximum  numbers  were  seen 
in  the  morning.  Those  seen  with  directed  flight  were  generally 
traveling  toward  or  away  from  Pohnpei.  Ten  (26%)  were 
sitting  on  the  water,  and  four  had  joined  a  large  feeding  flock. 
White-tailed  tropicbirds  favor  high  islands  for  nesting  and  are 
known  to  nest  in  trees  and  rocky  cliffs  on  Pohnpei  (Baker, 
1951). 

A  single  white-tailed  tropicbird  was  sighted  400  km  north 
of  Belau.  where  it  breeds  on  several  islands  (Baker,  1951).  Our 
last  sighting  was  of  a  lone  bird  on  21  October  in  Region  V.  on 
the  far  northwestern  edge  of  the  species'  range  (Harrison. 
1985).  It  was  flying  east  approximately  200  km  east  of  Samar 
Island  (Philippines)  at  10°49'N.  127°53'E. 

Family  Sulidae 

Boobies  were  seen  throughout  the  study  area  except  in 
Region  V,  the  Philippine  Sea  and  Basin.  All  three  pantropical 
species  were  seen  in  the  Line  Islands  only.  Although  we  saw 
only  87  boobies,  this  family  ranked  third  in  total  numbers, 
contributing  1.3%  of  all  individuals  observed  on  the  cruise 
(Fig.  4,  Table  3).  It  was  most  common  in  the  Line  Islands  and 
Micronesia  (Figs.  5,6;  Table  3).  Many  sightings  were  within 
80  km  of  their  nearest  breeding  islands,  but  there  were  several 
exceptions,  one  being  a  possible  new  pelagic  record  of  a 
masked  booby  (S.  dactylatra)  in  the  central  South  China  Sea 
(see  below). 

All  three  species  of  boobies  commonly  participate  in 
feeding  flocks.  This  tendency  is  greatest  with  the  red-footed 
booby  (5.  sula)but  is  much  less  overall  than  for  more  gregarious 
species  such  as  sooty  terns  or  wedge-tailed  shearwaters  (King, 
1970).  Our  data  ( 14  flocks)  indicate  that  boobies  participated 
in  21.4%  of  the  flocks  (Table  7),  accounting  for  1.6%  of  the 
total  number  of  flocking  birds  (Fig.  7).  Of  893  feeding  flocks 
in  a  large  study  area  centered  on  the  Hawaiian  Islands,  boobies 
participated  in  12.3%.  although  their  numbers  only  accounted 
for  1.8%  of  the  total  (King.  1970). 

Masked  Booby  (Sula  dactylatra):  Masked  boobies,  resident 
breeders  in  the  tropical  Pacific,  were  seen  sporadically  across 
the  entire  cruise  track  (N  =  37).  They  were  most  common  in 
the  Line  Islands,  where  densities  reached  0.49  birds/10  knr. 
Small  numbers  were  present  in  the  Phoenix  and  Gilbert  Groups 
and  South  China  Sea  (Table  2).  Although  wide-ranging 
throughout  the  Pacific,  this  species  was  not  mapped  as  occurring 
west  of  around  143°E  (i.e.,  the  Marianas  chain)  (Harrison, 
1985)  but  is  recorded  elsewhere  from  the  Philippines,  coastal 


237 


IV 
N     799 


V 

N     34 


111 

N     495 


Ml 

PROCELLARIIDAE 

E3 

HYDROBATIDAE 

in 

PHAETHONTIDAE 

^ 

SULIDAE 

■1 

FREGATIDAE 

ED 

ANATIDAE 

EH 

CHARADRIIOAE 

M 

SCOLOPACIDAE 

En 

PHALAROPODIOAE 

in 

STERCORARIIDAE 

□ 

LARIOAE 

VI 
N     22 


VII 
N     65 


Fig.  5.    Relative  abundance  of  birds  bj  famil}  in  Regions  I-III. 


Fig.  6.    Relative  abundance  ot  birds  b\  tanuh  in  Regions  [\   \  II    See  Fig.  5 
for  legend. 


Java.  Indo-China,  Malaya,  and  Borneo  (Delacour  &  Mayr, 
1946;  King  &  Dickinson.  1975).  There  appear  to  be  no  records 
from  the  central  South  China  Sea,  where  we  saw  a  single 
juvenile,  flying  west,  on  2?  October  at  05°49'N,  107°30'E, 
a  location  equidistant  (ca.  400  km  I  from  Borneo,  Vietnam,  and 
the  Malay  Peninsula. 

Nonmigratory.  masked  boobies  generally  occur  within  the 
\  icinity  of  their  breeding  islands,  hut  the}  roam  far  out  to  sea. 
They  characteristically  follow  ships:  one-quarter  of  the  birds 
circled  around  or  followed  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev. 
Juveniles-subadults  accounted  for  two-thirds  of  our  overall 
sightings,  especially  in  the  Line  Islands,  where  they  breed. 

Red-footed  Booby  (Sula  sulci):  This  pantropical  booby 
ranges  across  the  entire  tropical  and  subtropical  Pacific,  breeding 
in  many  localities.  We  observed  41  individuals  in  the  Line. 
Phoenix,  and  Caroline  Islands. 

Although  nonmigratory,  the  lack  of  subadult  birds  at  some 
colonies  has  given  rise  to  the  hypothesis  that  although  adults 
arc  relativel)  sedentary,  many  juveniles  disperse  from  their 
natal  islands  (Schreiber  &  Ashmole.  1970).  Pacific  Ocean 
Biological  Survey  Program  personnel  have  shown  that  red- 
foots  generally  remain  within  the  vicinity  of  breeding  or 
roosting  areas,  and  that  adults  are  seldom  encountered  more 
than  80  km  from  land  (  King.  1967).  Our  sightings  conformed 
to  this  pattern.  For  example,  we  passed  500  km  east  ol  Palmyra, 
which  harbors  the  largest  colony  of  red-loots  in  the  world 
(25.000).  yet  saw  none.  The  only  red-foots  seen  in  the  Line 
Islands  were  three  light  morph  adults,  Hying  east,  within 
I  10  km  of  Maiden  Island,  where  approximate!)  2.000  birds 


TABLE  7 

Participation  b\  species  or  species  groups  in  14  feeding  flocks 
alona  the  14,892km  cruise  track. 


Species 

Flocks 

Participation 

Number 

Percent 

Sooty  tern 

10 

71.4 

White  tern 

8 

57.1 

Noddies 

5 

35.7 

Wedge-tailed 

shearwater 

4 

28.6 

Other  shearw; 

Hers 

and  petrels 

4 

2S.6 

Boobies 

3 

21.4 

Greal  frigatet 

iird 

2 

14.3 

Stercoral!  uls 

2 

14.3 

White-tailed  tropic 

bird 

1 

7.1 

breed  (Clapp.  1967).  and  1  juvenile,  also  flying  east,  around 
460  km  northwest  of  Caroline  Atoll.  In  the  Phoenix  Group,  we 
obsen  ed  one  dark  morph  adult  in  a  feeding  flock  about  100  km 
equidistant  from  several  islands. 

In  the  central  Pacific,  red-foots  lay  from  February  to 
November,  depending  on  the  island  and  food  supply  (Nelson. 
1978).  In  the  Southern  Line  Islands,  the  maun'  egg-laying 
period  from  1988  to  1989  was  September  to  October  (ICBP. 
1990:  Kepler  era/.,  Subchapter  1.2,  this  vol.  i.  which  may  have 
accounted  for  the  small  number  of  birds  seen  on  our  cruise. 
During  March  and  May  1 990,  at-sea  observations  throughout 
the  Southern  Line  Islands  recorded  much  larger  numbers  of 


238 


rod-foots  than  in  September  1988.  These  were  primarily 
juveniles  dispersing  after  a  successful  breeding  season. 

On  1 3  October  we  observed  30  red-foots  in  the  vicinity  of 
Pohnpei.  Most  of  these  were  participants  in  two  feeding  flocks, 
one  of  which  was  the  second  largest  on  the  cruise.  Both  flocks 
developed  immediately  after  a  storm.  The  proportion  of  light- 
to  dark-phase  birds  at  Pohnpei  was  22:9.  Red-foot  density  was 
highest  on  this  day  ( 1 .62  birds/10  km:).  Overall  densities  were 
1 0  times  greater  in  Micronesia  than  elsewhere,  due  to  the  large 
numbers  seen  feeding  near  Pohnpei. 

Brown  Boobv  (Sula  leuconaster):  This  pantropical  species 
ranges  widely  in  the  Pacific  and  breeds  on  almost  every  island 
group,  although  typically  in  smaller  numbers  than  red-foots. 
The  brown  booby,  less  dependent  on  the  tropical  blue  waters 
preferred  by  the  other  two  species,  is  often  found  in  inshore 
waters,  including  harbors  and  estuaries,  which  are  more  polluted 
and  more  accessible  to  man.  Because  of  this.  Nelson  ( 1978) 
considers  that  the  brown  booby  has  suffered  more  than  its 
congeners,  probably  accounting  for  their  small  numbers  in 
populated  areas  such  as  Micronesia  and  the  South  China  Sea. 
Brown  boobies  are  seldom  encountered  more  than  80  km  from 
land  (King.  1967),  but  Harrison  (1985)  noted  that  there  is 
evidence  to  support  small-scale  dispersal. 

We  observed  only  nine  individuals  in  the  Line  Islands, 
Caroline  Islands  (Micronesia),  and  South  China  Sea.  We 
attempted  to  relate  these  individuals  to  nearby  colonies.  In  the 
Northern  Line  Islands  (two  sightings  at  02°02'N,  157°37'W) 
the  closest  colony  was  Christmas  Island  (N  =  100),  32  km 
distant. 

In  Micronesia,  the  only  brown  boobies  (two  adults)  were 
at  10°03'N,  150°02'E,  approximately  150  km  northwest  of 
Magur,  Namonuito  Atoll,  Truk  (07°N,  147°E),  and  220  km 
from  uninhabited  East  Fayu  Island,  Truk  (08°N.  151°E). 
Although  brown  boobies  nest  on  uninhabited  islands  in  the 
Marshall  Islands (Amerson,  1969;SPREP,  1989),theircolonies 
are  rare  and  little  known  in  the  Caroline  Islands.  Some  birds 
were  seen  at  Truk  in  1945  (Baker,  1951).  and  earlier  this 
century,  "incredible  numbers  of  seabirds."  which  Nelson  ( 1978) 
suspects  may  have  included  brown  boobies,  were  reported  on 
West  Fayu,  Gaspar  Rico,  and  Magur.  Nelson  further  notes  that 
"East  Fayu  is  also  a  breeding  site,"  implying  a  colony  of  this 
species.  Although  the  ornithology  of  these  islands  is  virtually 
unstudied  (NID,  1945:  Nicholson  &  Douglas,  1969;  Owen, 
1 97 1 , 1 977a, b;  Ray  Fosberg,  personal  communication),  several 
colonies  of  brown  boobies  may  still  exist  in  the  Caroline 
Islands.  It  is  unlikely  that  the  brown  boobies  we  observed  were 
from  the  Marshall  Islands,  the  nearest  known  colony  of  which 
is  Enewetak.  about  1.400  km  to  the  east. 

Seabird  information  in  the  more  remote  islets  of  the 
Philippines  and  in  the  South  China  Sea  is  similarly  scarce  and 
outdated  (Delacour&  Mayr.  1946:  King  &  Dickinson.  1975; 
Nelson,  1978;  Harrison,  1985).  Nelson  states  that  "the  status 
of  the  Brown  Booby  here  is  little  known.  There  are  some,  could 
be  many  and  may  be  few."  Their  only  known  nesting  colony 
near  Balabac  Strait  is  at  Tubbataha  Reefs  (68°N,  1 20°E)  in  the 
central  Sulu  Sea  (Worcester.  1911,  in  Nelson,  1978,  IUCN. 
1988a). 


In  the  South  China  Sea,  we  observed  five  brown  boobies 
in  the  Balabac  Strait  close  to  numerous  islands  off  the  southern 
tip  of  Palawan  (07°44'N,  1 16°58'E)  and  near  northwest  Borneo 
(05°92'N,  114°03'E  and  04°40'N,  113°20'E).  The  closest 
known  colony  is  Spratly  Island  (Nan-Sha  Reefs),  evidently  the 
only  remaining  colony  of  brown  boobies  in  Malaysian  waters 
that  has  not  been  overexploited  (Nelson,  1978)  that  was  still 
extant  16  years  ago  (Haile,  1964,  in  Nelson,  1978).  Both 
locations  were  within  30  km  of  coastlines.  Our  brown  boobies, 
approximately  200  km  west  of  this  reef  and  flying  east,  could 
have  originated  there  (or  on  several  other  little-known  islands 
in  the  southwest  Sulu  Sea). 

Overall  densities  of  brown  boobies  were  low  everywhere, 
but  were  four  to  six  times  higher  in  the  Sulu  Sea-South  China 
Sea  than  in  the  Line  Islands  and  Micronesia,  respectively 
(Table  2).  These  distributional  patterns  are  most  likely  due  to 
the  proximity  of  our  cruise  track  to  potential  breeding  islands 
and  nearshore  waters.  We  saw  no  brown  boobies  in  feeding 
flocks. 

Family  Fregatidae 

Frigatebirds  were  seen  throughout  our  cruise  track  except 
for  the  Gilbert  Islands  and  the  Philippine  Sea.  The  only 
identifiable  species  was  the  great  frigatebird  (Fregata  minor): 
two  distant,  unidentifiable  frigatebirds  were  seen  in  the  central 
South  China  Sea.  Surprisingly,  no  lesser  frigatebirds  (F.  oriel) 
were  seen,  even  though  they  winter  in  the  western  tropical 
Pacific  (Sibley  &  Clapp,  1967).  Densities  (Table  2)  were 
highest  in  the  Phoenix  Islands  (0.30  birds/10  km2),  where  the 
largest  populations  in  the  Pacific  breed,  and  lowest  in 
Micronesia,  where  frigates  are  known  to  be  scarce.  Overall, 
frigates  accounted  for  only  0.7%  of  all  birds  observed  on  the 
cruise  (Fig.  4). 

Great  Frigatebird  (Frcvcita  minor):  We  observed  23  great 
frigatebirds  in  the  Line,  Phoenix,  and  Caroline  Islands.  Densities 
were  highest  in  the  Phoenix  Islands  (Table  2),  where  over 
30,000  are  known  to  breed  (Stoddart.  1976). 

We  saw  only  five  great  frigatebirds  in  the  Line  Islands, 
where  around  13,000  breed  (Clapp.  1967;  Garnett  1983; 
Kepler  et  al,  Subchapter  1.2,  this  vol.).  These  low  numbers 
may  reflect  the  fact  that  birds  are  concentrated  on  and  near 
colonies  during  the  breeding  season  (Clapp,  1967;  Kepler 
et  al..  Subchapter  1.2,  this  vol.). 

In  Micronesia,  we  saw  only  one  frigatebird,  part  of  a 
large  feeding  flock  near  Pohnpei.  Evidently  frigatebirds  are 
infrequent  in  the  Caroline  Islands  (Baker.  1951;  King,  1967; 
Pratt  et  al.,  1987).  We  located  only  one  reference  to  breeding 
colonies  of  this  species  in  this  region  (Niering,  1961  (.otherwise 
they  "are  probably  resident,  especially  in  the  eastern  part" 
(Baker,  1951). 

The  juvenile  frigate  in  the  southwest  Sulu  Sea  (08°02'N. 
1 17°28'W)  and  the  adult  in  the  South  China  Sea  near  Vietnam 
(05°48'N,  106°5  l'E)  could  have  come  from  anywhere,  as  they 
may  wander  thousands  of  kilometers  (Sibley  &  Clapp,  1967; 
Nelson,  1975).  Great  frigatebirds  were  minor  participants  in 
feeding  flocks,  contributing  only  0.3%  of  the  total  numbers 
(Table  8). 


239 


Family  Anatidae 

Onl)  one  vagrant  duck  was  observed  (below),  with  an 
overall  density  in  Micronesia  of  0.01  birds/10  km2. 

Northern Sho\e\er  (Anas  chpeata):  This Holarctic breeder 
is  a  rare  but  regular  vagrant  to  Oceania.  Recorded  locations  in 
Micronesia  are  the  Marianas,  Pohnpei  east  to  Wake,  and  the 
Marshalls  (Baker.  195  1 :  Pratt  et  al,  1987). 

We  saw  an  unsexed  bird  in  eclipse  plumage  three  times 
w  ithin  a  half  hour  on  1 3  October  near  Pohnpei.  Each  time  it «  as 
Hushed  by  the  ship.  Its  characteristic  bill  shape  and  bicolored 
speculum  made  identification  relatively  eas)  . 

Family  Charadriidae 

We  observed  only  one  member  of  this  family  in  small 
numbers  during  its  southward  migration  from  arctic  breeding 
grounds. 

Lesser  Golden-Plover  ( Plmialis  dominica):  We  saw  five 
golden-plovers:  Phoenix  Islands.  Caroline  Islands  (north  of 
the  Hall  Islands  and  Ulithi  Atoll),  and  in  the  Philippine  Sea. 
where  its  density  was  highest  (0.28  birds/10  km2). 

This  long-legged  plover  breeds  in  Siberia  and  arctic  Alaska, 
migrating  annually  to  islands  throughout  the  tropical  Pacific. 
Most  abundant  from  August  to  April,  small  numbers  are 
present  all  year  ( Pratt  et  al..  1 987).  It  is  also  a  common  migrant 
in  southeast  Asia  (King  &  Dickinson.  1975). 

During  an  oceanographic  station  on  19  October,  one 
individual,  uncounted  on  the  transects,  circled  the  ship  several 
times  and  landed,  remaining  on  board  for  a  week,  during  which 
time  it  weakened  considerably.  Its  final  attempt  at  flight 
resulted  in  drowning. 

Family  Scolopac  idae 

Ten  members  and  three  species  of  this  family  were 
observed,  all  present  in  small  numbers  scattered  within  the 
Line.  Gilbert,  and  Caroline  Islands.  All  were  migrants  from 
Holarctic  breeding  grounds. 

Shorebirds  are  rarely  seen  in  large  numbers  at  sea.  even 
during  migration.  For  example.  POBSP  personnel  on  the 
Town  soul  Cromwell,  working  replicate  tracks  in  a  1 7 1  million- 
ha  study  area  from  March  1964  to  June  1965.  observed  only 
four  species,  each  only  once  (King,  1970).  Nonseabird  migrants 
(sandpipers,  plovers,  phalaropes,  and  a  duck)  observed  from 
the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev  accounted  for  1.6%  of  the  total 
birds  seen  (Pig.  3). 

Bristle-thighed  Curlew  (Numenius  taliitiaisi.s):  One  of 
the  world's  least-studied  shorebirds.  the  bristle-thighed  curlew- 
is  considered  rare  throughout  its  range  and  is  a  candidate  for  the 

1  S  Fish  &  Wildlife  Service  Endangered  Species  List  (Gill, 
1990;  Marks  et  al..  1990).  During  the  boreal  winter,  it  is 
common  in  the  Line  Islands,  northwest  Hawaiian  Islands,  and 
southeast  Polynesia  hut  uncommon  to  rare  elsewhere  in  the 
Pacific  (Pratt  et  al.  I9S7).  All  our  at-sea  sightings  were  on 
16  September  in  the  Northern  Line  Islands  (density  0.09 
birds/10  km  )  clustered  in  a  small  area  north-northeast  of 
Fanning  Island  and  close  to  Christmas  Island  (04  55'N  to 

02  02'N,  157  00'Wto  157  37'W).  Half  the  birds  were  flying 
south,  the  most  expected  direction  for  September,  as  curlews 
are  most  abundant  in  (he  Line  Islands  and  Tuamotus  between 


October  and  April  (Gill.  1990;  Kepler  et  al..  Subchapter  1.2. 
this  vol.).  We  saw  no  more  until  arriving  on  Caroline  Atoll  one 
week  later,  where  we  estimated  a  population  of  >300. 

Ruddy  Turnstone  (Armaria  interpres):  Another  arctic 
breeder  that  winters  in  the  Pacific,  the  ruddy  turnstone  is  a 
widespread  migrant  to  the  Pacific,  mostly  betw  een  August  and 
May.  It  is  common  from  the  Hawaiian  Islands  and  Micronesia 
south  to  Samoa  and  Fiji  (Pratt  et  al..  1 987).  A  single  turnstone 
circled  the  ship  in  late  afternoon  about  80  km  east  of  Abemama 
Atoll,  Gilbert  Islands,  on  8  October. 

Sharp-tailed  (Calidris  acuminata  )/Pet:(ora\  Sandpiper 
(C.  mclanotos):  These  similar  species  are  arctic  breeders  that 
winter  in  the  South  Pacific.  We  observed  five  birds  in  fall 
plumage  flying  south  in  a  tight  flock  on  160ctoberat  U°10'N, 
143°17'E.  Both  species  have  been  recorded  from  Micronesia, 
especially  C.  acuminata  in  the  western  portion  of  the  archipelago 
(Pratt  etal.,  1987). 

Family  Phalaropodidae 

One  member  of  this  family  was  found  in  the  South  China 
Sea,  one  of  its  favored  w  inter  quarters. 

Red-necked  Phalarope  (Phalaropus  lohatus):  A 
circumpolar  breeder,  this  phalarope  migrates  south  to  winter  at 
sea.  Although  it  can  be  encountered  almost  anv  w  here  in  the 
Pacific-southeast  Asian  region  between  the  Aleutians  and  the 
equator,  it  favors  two  areas:  coastal  Peru  and  the  South  China 
Sea  (Harrison,  1985). 

We  first  observed  small  flocks  of  this  species  on 
22  October  on  the  eastern  edge  of  the  Sulu  Sea  (08°59'N, 
123C12'E).  They  continued  to  appear  thereafter, 
characteristically  flushing  from  the  water  close  to  the  ship's 
sides.  Those  that  were  not  flushed  were  observ  ed  resting  on  the 
water  surface  or  feeding  in  areas  where  currents  or  wind 
produced  debris  or  foam  lines. 

We  saw  44  phalaropes.  1 .20^  of  the  total  number  of  birds 
on  the  cruise.  Their  highest  density  was  in  the  South  China  Sea 
(2.96  birds/ lOknf). 

Family  Stercorariidae 

Three  species  of  skuas/jaegers  were  seen  (N  =  13) 
plus  12  unidentified  stercorariids  (Table  4).  The)  occurred 
primarily  in  Micronesia  and  the  South  China  Sea.  where 
densities  were  0.16/10  km2  and  0.35/10  km.  respectively. 
None  were  seen  in  the  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands,  or  in  the 
Philippine  Sea  anil  Basin  (Regions  I.  II.  V).  Stercorariids 
accounted  for  0.795  of  all  birds  observed  on  the  cruise. 

Although  ranging  w  idely.  movementsoi  skuas  and  jaegers 
are  little  known  except  that  some  migrator)  pathways  tend  to 
follow  coastlines  (King.  1967).  Some  juveniles  evidently 
remain  on  the  wintering  grounds  all  year. 

Only  the  Pomarine jaeger  has  been  recorded  lor  southeast 
Asia  (Tenasserim,  Malaya,  central  Thailand,  and  Hong  Kong) 
(Kingcx;  Dickinson.  1987:153).  However.  King  A:  Dickinson 
noted  that  three  other  species  ma)  occur  there.  We  report 
possible  first  sightings  of  the  parasitic  jaeger  in  the  South  China 
Sea.  Since  all  siereoranid  sightings  are  rare  for  the  western 
Pacific  and  southeast  Asia,  our  data  on  I  2  unidentified  species 
follows: 


240 


a)  1 2  October,  two  in  feeding  flock  at  04°03'N,  163°3 1  'E; 

b)  13  October,  five  flying  north,  one  in  feeding  Hock 
at  06°16'N,  157°51'E.  Heavy  squalls  and  winds  from  the 
north: 

c)  1?  October,  one  Hying  east  at  10°19'N,  147°39'E;  and 

d)  25  October,  six  Hushed  by  ship  from  resting  position  on 
water  at  05°44'N.  !08°01'E. 

South  Polar  or  McCormick's  Skua  iCaiharacta 
maccormicki):  This  thickset,  gull-like  seabird  breeds  in 
Antarctica.  It  is  an  uncommon  migrant  in  the  Pacific,  known 
only  from  the  Hawaiian.  Line,  and  Phoenix  Islands,  possibly 
west  to  the  Gilbert  Islands  (Pratt  etui.  1987).  Harrison  (1985) 
notes  that  juveniles  disperse  much  further  north  than  adults, 
possibly  following  a  clockwise  path  across  the  Pacific  rim  past 
Japan  (May-July)  to  British  Columbia  and  California 
(September-October),  then  back  to  Antarctica  to  breed  in  the 
austral  summer. 

We  observed  five  south  polar  skuas  (three  light-  and  one 
dark-phased  adults  and  one  juvenile)  in  Regions  III  and  IV 
(Gilbert  and  Caroline  Islands).  All  Hew  very  close  to  the  ship, 
and  four  participated  in  feeding  flocks. 

Our  sightings  fall  within  the  known  range  of  this  species 
( Harrison,  1 985 ),  although  other  authorities  indicate  that  south 
polar  skuas  do  not  range  this  far  west  (Mayr.  1945:  Baker. 
1951;  Pratt.  1987).  Since  published  records  are  sparse  (they 
were  not  listed  in  Baker.  195 1 ).  our  exact  sightings  follow: 

a)  one  juvenile,  8  October,  flying  south  at  OTOO'N, 
172°40'E,  just  south  of  Tarawa,  Gilbert  Islands. 

b)  two  adults,  light  phase,  12  October,  in  a  feeding  flock 
at  04°03'N,  1 63°3 1  'E,  south  of  Kosrae.  The  feeding  flock  was 
composed  of  six  species:  two  south  polar  skuas,  two  Pomarine/ 
parasitic  jaegers.  >200  sooty  terns.  17  wedge-tailed  shearwaters 
(dark phase).  1  Kermadec  petrel. 2Bulwer'spetrels.  Itdeveloped 
in  midmorning  immediately  after  a  series  of  rain  squalls  had 
moved  through  the  area  from  the  south. 

c)  two  adults  (one  very  dark,  one  light),  13  October  at 
05°43'N,  l5°25'E,just  south  of  Pohnpei.  The  dark  morph  was 
flying  southeast,  the  light  one  had  joined  a  small  feeding  flock 
of  22  wedge-tailed  shearwaters.  Four  hours  later  heavy  winds 
and  squalls  hit  us  from  the  north,  after  which  a  massive 
concentration  of  fish  attracted  a  large  feeding  flock  which 
included  an  unidentified  skua. 

The  highest  densities  of  south  polar  skuas  were  in 
Micronesia  (0.05  birds/10  km:). 

Pomarine  Jaeger  or  Pomarine  Skua  {Stercoruriits 
poinariimsY.  This  Holarctic-breeding  jaeger  migrates  south  to 
winter  throughout  the  tropical,  subtropical,  and  temperate 
areas  of  the  Pacific.  Evidently  in  good  breeding  years  adults 
move  south  in  August-September,  followed  by  juveniles  in 
September-October  (Harrison,  1985).  Our  entire  cruise  track 
was  within  its  known  range. 

From  22  to  25  October  we  observed  three  Pomarine 
jaegers  in  the  Sulu  Sea  and  South  China  Sea  ( Table  4 ).  One  was 
a  light-phase  adult,  the  rest,  juveniles.  One  juvenile  was 
flushed  from  a  resting  position  on  the  water,  while  the  others 
flew  east  or  south.  The  highest  densities  of  this  species  were 
in  the  South  China  Sea  (0.07  birds/ 10  km2). 


Parasitic  Jaeger  or  Arctic  Skud(Stercorarius  parasiticus): 
The  Holarctic  breeding  and  Pacific  wintering  ranges  overlap 
those  of  the  Pomarine  Jaeger  (Harrison.  1985).  Since  this 
species  has  not  been  recorded  from  the  central  Pacific  and  is 
uncommon  in  the  western  Pacific  (for  example  Bismarck 
Archipelago  and  Bonin  Islands),  its  migration  routes  are  thought 
to  remain  close  to  the  continental  coasts  (King,  1967).  King& 
Dickinson  ( 1975)  mentioned  that  it  might  occur  in  southeast 
Asia. 

Our  observations  came  from  the  Caroline  Islands  and 
South  China  Sea.  One  juvenile  was  sighted  on  12  October, 
south  of  Kosrae  (04°22'N,  162°2 1  'E)  flying  east;  and  one  adult 
was  seen  on  14  October  north  of  the  Hall  Islands  (09°46'N, 
154°43E),  flying  southeast.  We  also  saw  parasitic  jaegers  on 
24  October  off  the  north  coast  of  Borneo  (04°40'N,  1 13°20'E. 
one  juvenile,  flying  southeast)  and  on  25  October  in  the  central 
South  China  Sea  (05°49'N,  107°30E,  one  adult  dark  morph. 
flying  southwest). 

Three  of  our  five  birds  on  transect  were  headed  in  a 
southerly  direction,  which  is  appropriate  for  October,  when 
they  dispersed  south  from  their  breeding  grounds. 
Greatest  densities  (Table  2)  were  in  the  South  China  Sea 
(0.09  birds/ 10  knr).  which  fits  the  hypothesis  that  migratory 
routes  tend  to  follow  continental  coasts. 

An  additional  parasitic  jaeger  was  encountered  during  our 
3-day  layover  near  Mui  Bai  Bung  Cape,  Vietnam  at  05°47'N, 
107°45'E):  On  27  October  at  1605  ha  juvenile,  dark  morph 
parasitic  jaeger  pursued  an  adult  male  shikra  (Accipiterbadius) 
with  prey,  a  barn  swallow  (Hirundo  rustica),  for  about 
4  minutes  (Ellis  et  ai,  1990).  Finally  the  jaeger  bound  to  the 
shikra  and/or  its  prey.  All  three  birds  whirled  about  three 
revolutions  and  fell  into  the  sea.  After  about  7  seconds  in  the 
water,  the  shikra  flapped  away.  The  jaeger  remained  in  the 
water  with  its  prize,  drifting  near  the  ship's  stern. 
Oceanographers  later  found  the  swallow's  head  in  a  plankton 
net. 

Family  Laridae 

This  family  was  represented  by  9  species  of  terns,  plus 
4  unidentified  larids.  totaling  2.953  individuals.  Larids 
accounted  for  81%  of  all  birds  sighted  on  the  cruise.  They 
dominated  the  pelagic  waters  of  Regions  I  to  IV,  after  which 
their  numbers  diminished  considerably.  Sooty  terns  (Sterna 
fuscata)  were  the  most  abundant  species  overall,  accounting 
for  62.8%  of  all  birds  seen  on  the  cruise  (Fig.  3),  with  a 
maximum  density  of  43.27/10  knr  in  the  Phoenix  Islands. 

Larids.  which  characteristically  breed  on  oceanic  islands 
(sooty  tern,  black  and  brown  noddies,  white  tern),  were  present 
in  far  greater  abundance  than  species  that  typically  inhabit 
areas  closer  to  continents  (Caspian  tern,  S.  caspia;  black-naped 
tern,  S.  sumatrana;  and  bridled  tern,  5.  anaethetus).  We 
expected  to  see  far  more  coastal  birds  in  southeast  Asia. 
Human  population  pressures  and  habitat  alteration  evidently 
weigh  heavily  on  the  natural  resources  in  this  area. 

Sooty,  white,  and  noddy  terns  were  major  participants  in 
feeding  flocks,  accounting  for  88.129!  of  all  Hocking  birds 
(Table  5). 


241 


Caspian  Tern  (Sterna  caspia):  This  large,  cosmopolitan 
tern  primarily  breeds  inland  in  Europe  (including  the  Baltic  Sea 
and  interior  USSR)  and  North  America,  along  sea  coasts  and 
inland  along  rivers  and  lakes,  migrating  and  dispersing 
southward  during  the  nonbreeding  season,  remaining  very 
close  to  continental  coastlines.  Apart  from  its  winter  status  in 
Japan  as  a  visitor,  the  Caspian  tern  is  rare  or  uncommon  in 
southeast  Asia  (Harrison.  1985:  King  &  Dickinson.  1987): 
records  are  from  Cambodia.  Laos,  extreme  south  Vietnam,  and 
Thai  land,  but  not  from  Singapore  (Hails,  1987).  We  observed 
five  Caspian  terns.  Hying  east  and  south,  on  the  last  day  of  the 
cruise.  31  October,  in  Singapore  Roadstead.  Absent  elsewhere, 
this  species  had  a  density  of  0.49  birds/10  knr  here. 

Black-napcd  Tern  [Sterna  sinnatrana):  A  small,  mostly 
white,  rather  delicate  tern,  the  black-naped  is  mainly  sedentary, 
breeding  in  the  warm  watersof  the  western  Pacific  and  southeast 
Asia.  It  is  primarily  a  resident  of  seacoasts  and  offshore  islets 
(Harrison.  1985;  King  &  Dickinson,  1987), extending  eastward 
no  further  than  180°  longitude  (King,  1967). 

We  recorded  two,  one  adult  80  km  north  of  Ulithi  Atoll 
(District  of  Yap,  Micronesia)  and  a  juvenile  approximately 
550  km  east  of  the  Philippines. 

Gray-backed  or  Spectacled  Tern  (Sterna  lunata):  The 
gray-backed  tern  breeds  in  the  Hawaiian,  Phoenix,  Line,  and 
Tuamotu  Islands,  plus  several  other  island  groups  to  the 
southwest.  At  sea,  it  occurs  as  a  vagrant  or  migrant  w  ithin  these 
approximate  boundaries  (King,  1967;  Harrison,  1985).  Their 
range  is  poorly  known,  probably  because  they  are  similar  to. 
and  often  associated  in  small  numbers  with,  the  abundant  sooty 
tern. 

We  recorded  eight  gray-backed  terns  in  the  Line  and 
Phoenix  Islands.  Two  adults  w  ere  seen  on  20  September  within 
30  km  of  Maiden  (04°03'S.  I55°01'W).  Within  the  Line 
Islands,  gray-backed  terns  are  known  to  breed  on  Christmas. 
Jarvis.  and  Maiden  (Clapp.  1967).  thus  we  were  probably 
observing  birds  from  the  Maiden  colony  (500-1.000  birds), 
which  would  have  been  breeding  at  that  time  (Clapp.  1967; 
Grossman  &  Grossman.  1974;  Garnett.  1983). 

In  the  Phoenix  Islands  we  saw  two  birds  centrally  in  the 
group  and  six  ( including  one  juvenile )  north  of  McKean.  Gray- 
backed  terns  breed  on  Enderbury  (N  =  10.000  birds).  Phoenix 
( N  =  1 .800 birds),  and  McKean  ( N  =  23.000 birds)  <  King.  1 973; 
Garnett,  1983). 

Gray-backed  tern  densities  were  greatest  in  the  Phoenix 
Islands  (0.20  birds/10  km>.  close  to  the  largest  breeding 
colonies  in  the  world.  Because  breeding  was  in  progress,  most 
tems  were  likel)  to  be  on  or  near  land. 

Bridled  or  Brown-winged  Tern  (Sterna  anaethetus): 
Frequenting  offshore  waters  and  open  ocean  in  the  tropics  and 
subtropics,  tins  species  is  the  ecological  counterpart  of 
S.  lunata  in  the  western  Pacific.  We  identified  three  bridled 
terns  in  Singapore  Harbor;  they  are  known  to  be  offshore 
residents  of  the  Malay  Peninsula  (Hails.  1987;  King  & 
Dickinson.  1987). 

Sooty  Tern  (Sterna  luscata):  The  most  abundant  seabird 
in  the  tropical  Pacific,  the  soots  tern  breeds  colonial!}  in  large 
numbers  on  almost  every  island  group.  Ii  ranges  widely 
between  the  tropics  of  Capricorn  and  Cancer. 


We  observed  this  species  in  the  Line,  Phoenix,  and 
Gilbert  Islands  and  Micronesia.  It  was  the  most  abundant  bird 
observed  on  the  cruise  (N  =  2.305),  nearly  eight  times  more 
numerous  than  the  secondmost  common  species,  the  wedge- 
tailed  shearwater  (Table  4).  Sooty  terns  comprised  62.8% 
of  the  total  number  of  birds  observed  (Fig.  4). 

Sooty  terns  ranged  throughout  the  Line  Islands,  with 
heavier  concentrations  near  Christmas  and  Jarvis.  Major 
colonies,  of  approximately  two  million  each,  exist  on  these  two 
islands.  The  Christmas  populations  have  declined  drastically 
in  recent  years  (from  an  estimated  15  million  10  years  ago)  due 
to  predation  by  rats  and  cats,  direct  human  exploitation  for 
food,  and  reproductive  failure  due  to  the  1982-1983  El  Nino 
Southern  Oscillation  (King.  1973:  Gould.  1974b;  Garnett. 
1984;  Schreiber  &  Schreiber.  1984;  E.  Schreiber,  personal 
communication). 

In  Region  II.  sooty  tern  populations  are  estimated  at 
around  four  million  (Gould,  1974b).  Here  we  observed  the 
highest  density  of  all  species  (43.27  birds/ 1 0  knr),  eight  times 
greater  than  sooties  in  the  Line  Islands  (Table  2).  Sooty  terns 
are  abundant  year-round  in  the  Phoenix  Islands,  with  highest 
densities  recorded  from  October  to  December  (Gould.  1974b). 

Their  numbers  at  sea  depend  on  their  breeding  cycles, 
which  are  often  complex  and  unpredictable,  even  within  a 
single  island.  In  1965,  and  from  1988  to  1990.  Caroline  Atoll 
had  19  colonies,  each  on  a  different  cycle,  giving  rise  to  egg- 
laying  in  virtually  every  month  (Clapp  &  Sibley.  1971a: 
Anne  Falconer,  personal  communication;  Kepler  et  <;/.. 
Subchapter  1.2,  this  vol.). 

In  Region  III  (Gilbert  Islands)  smaller  numbers  of  sooty 
terns  were  observed  (N  =  1 13):  we  found  moderate  densities 
(4.00/10  knr).  although  the  species  is  reported  as  uncommon 
at  sea  (Amerson.  1969).  Our  cruise  track  passed  close  to 
Aranuka.  which  is  thought  to  harbor  breeding  colonies 
(Amerson.  1969). 

In  Region  IV  (Micronesia),  we  only  observed  sooty  terns 
south  of  Kosrae  and  Pohnpei  (N  =  201):  200  of  these  were 
members  of  a  single  feeding  flock.  This  species  is  known  to 
breed  in  small  numbers  in  Micronesia  on  Pohnpei.  on  several 
uninhabited  atolls  in  the  northern  Marshalls  (Baker.  1951; 
Amerson.  1969).  and  on  Helen  Reef  (Engbring.  1983). 

Although  ranging  entirely  across  the  Pacific  Ocean  through 
southeast  Asia  into  the  Indian  Ocean  (Harrison.  1985).  sooty 
terns  have  been  seen  only  infrequently  in  the  far  western 
Pacific  (Baker.  1951;  Gould.  1974b).  The  POBSP  found  that 
the  perimeter  of  their  peripheral  breeding  localities  is  also  the 
normal  limit  of  their  pelagic  dispersal,  and  records  beyond  this 
have  historically  been  attributable  to  climatic  disturbances 
such  as  typhoons  (Gould.  1974b). 

Sooty  terns,  highly  gregarious  feeders  and  breeders, 
participated  in  7 1 .49!  of  all  1 4  feeding  flocks  and  contributed 
70.8'f  of  all  birds  within  the  flocks  (Tables  5.7;  Fig.  7).  Of 
2,305  sooty  terns  observed.  1.467  (64' r)  were  in  feeding 
Hocks,  as  was  also  found  (65'i )  by  Gould  ( 1974b).  Over  our 
entire  cruise  track, only  4'i  were  juveniles,  suggesting  that  few 
soot)  colonies  had  bred  recently.  By  contrast,  during  March  to 
May  1990  in  the  Line  Islands,  a  much  larger  proportion  of 
juveniles  were  observed  (ICBP.  1990). 


242 


Crested  Tern  ( Thalasseus  hcr^ii):  We  observed  only  two 
of  these  large,  coastal,  yellow-billed  terns.  Although  a  resident 
breeder  on  several  island  groups  in  the  central  and  western 
Pacific  and  southeast  Asia,  it  is  everywhere  uncommon  ( King, 
1967;  King  &  Dickinson.  1967;  Amerson.  1969).  Our  birds 
appeared  on  the  last  day  of  the  cruise  as  we  entered  Singapore 
Roadstead. 

Brow nor  Common  Noddy  (Anous  stolidus):  This  abundant 
tern  breeds  on  almost  all  island  groups  in  the  Pacific,  extending 
westward  into  southeast  Asia  (King,  1967;  Pratt  el  ai.  1987). 
Although  widespread,  it  generally  occurs  within  80  km  of  its 
breeding  colonies.  Much  remains  to  be  learned  of  the  precise 
details  of  its  dispersal  patterns  (Harrison,  1985). 

The  brown  noddy  was  the  third  most  abundant  bird  seen 
from  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev  (N  =  259).  An  additional 
203  noddies,  seen  in  Micronesia,  could  not  be  identified  to 
species.  Since  we  saw  no  black  noddies  (A.  minutus)  in 
Micronesia,  it  is  likely  that  they  were  also  A.  stolidus. 

Although  we  sighted  brown  noddies  in  the  Line,  Phoenix. 
Gilbert,  and  Caroline  Islands,  we  counted  only  five  birds  total. 
All  well  out  to  sea,  some  were  900  km  from  the  nearest  known 
breeding  colony  (ca.  7.700  birds  at  Phoenix  Island.  POBSP 
estimate,  in  Garnett,  1983). 

Despite  the  fact  that  the  Gilbert  Islands  are  heavily 
populated,  brown  noddy  densities  were  highest  there 
(7.09  birds/10  km2):  they  were  the  most  abundant  bird  in  the 
region  (Table  2).  This  species,  which  can  nest  in  trees,  is  much 
more  tolerant  of  humans  than  most  seabirds.  Pacific  Ocean 
Biological  Survey  Program  personnel  also  found  that/4,  stolidus 
was  common  throughout  the  Gilberts  up  to  80  km  from  land 
(November  to  December.  1962  and  1964).  It  breeds  on  six 
islands  in  the  southern  Gilberts,  including  Abemama,  near 
which  we  observed  235  brown  noddies  on  8  October. 

In  Micronesia,  18  brown  noddies  and  200  unidentified 
noddies  (probably  A.  stolidus)  close  to  Pohnpei  probably 
originated  on  that  island,  where  they  are  known  to  breed 
(Baker.  1951). 

Brown  noddies  were  regular  members  of  feeding  flocks, 
contributing  5%  of  their  numbers  (15%  if  the  unidentified 
noddies  are  included)  and  participating  in  36%  of  flocks 
(Tables  5.7).  Corresponding  figures  from  King  (1970)  are 
7  and  \\9c. 

Black  or  White-capped  Noddy  (Anous  minutus):  This 
species,  smaller  and  darker  than  the  brown  noddy,  breeds  and 
disperses  over  the  same  range.  It  is  more  sedentary,  however, 
and  feeds  closer  inshore.  Water  temperature  plays  an  important 
part  in  the  pelagic  distribution  of  both  noddy  species  (Murphy, 
1936):  both  are  largely  absent  from  cold-water  upwellings. 

Despite  the  black  noddy's  widespread  distribution  in  the 
Pacific,  we  only  observed  six.  Five  were  in  the  Line  Islands 
within  a  few  kilometers  of  Christmas  Island,  where 
approximately  10,000  breed  (Garnett,  1983).  The  remaining 
bird  was  in  the  Gilbert  Islands,  where  A.  minutus  may  still 
breed.  Twenty  years  ago  there  were  small  breeding  colonies  on 
eight  islands  (Amerson,  1969),  including  Maiana,  which  lay 
within  20  km  of  our  cruise  track. 

Greatest  densities  (0.11  birds/10  km2)  were  within  the 
Line  Islands,  where  breeding  populations  exceed  40,000 
(Stoddart,  1976).  Colonies  are  smaller  in  the  Phoenix  Islands, 


but  it  is  surprising  that  we  did  not  see  one,  as  we  passed  within 
80  km  of  Orona  ( Hull ).  where  1 0.000  birds  have  been  reported 
(King,  1973).  None  participated  in  feeding  flocks. 

White  or  Fairy  Tern  (Gve/.v  alba):  Tolerant  of  man,  the 
white  tern  breeds  throughout  the  tropical  Pacific.  As  with 
noddies,  it  is  most  common  within  80  km  of  its  breeding 
colonies,  but  may  wander  great  distances  out  to  sea  (King, 
1967;  Pratt  et  ai,  1987). 

The  white  tern  was  the  fourth  most  common  bird  (Fig.  4) 
seen  on  the  cruise  (N  =  146),  occurring  from  the  Line  Islands 
to  the  Philippines.  Many  sightings  were  of  ones  and  twos;  the 
largest  group  (18)  had  been  attracted  to  a  large  feeding  flock 
south  of  Pohnpei,  Caroline  Islands. 

At-sea  densities  of  white  terns,  as  for  many  other  tropical 
species,  reflect  in  part  their  breeding  phenology,  especially  for 
the  more  remote  islands.  Line  Islands  densities  were  low 
(0.05  birds/10  km2)  in  September  1988  but  much  higher  in 
March  to  May  1990  (ICBP,  1990).  Perry  (1980)  estimated 
17,050  white  terns  in  the  Line  Islands  and  noted  that  they 
ranged  widely  and  bred  all  year.  Densities  in  the  Phoenix 
Islands  were  higher  (0.31/10  km2),  a  surprise  considering  that 
the  overall  population  (10,000  birds;  Clapp,  1967)  is  smaller. 

White  tern  densities  were  greatest  (2.01  birds/10  km2)  in 
the  Gilbert  Islands,  due  in  large  part  to  89  birds  seen  the  day 
before  anchoring  at  Tarawa.  In  Micronesia,  36  G.  alba  were 
observed  south  of  Kosrae  and  Pohnpei,  and  one  was  found 
north  of  Ulithi  Atoll.  Baker  ( 1 95 1 )  implies  that  it  is  common 
in  Micronesia,  especially  on  low  islands:  Ulithi  is  listed  as  a 
breeding  site. 

White  terns  are  not  listed  for  the  Philippines  (Delacour  & 
Mayr,  1946;  King  &  Dickinson,  1975).  The  species  evidently 
rapidly  decreases  in  density  west  of  Micronesia.  Our  most 
westerly  sighting,  an  adult  flying  southwest  at  1 1°00'N,  132°59'E 
was  approximately  480  km  north-northwest  of  Belau,  the 
closest  landfall,  and  on  the  extreme  western  Pacific  limit  of  the 
white  tern's  known  range.  This  is  the  maximum  distance  that 
we  observed  this  species  from  land. 

Feeding  Flocks 

A  seabird  feeding  flock  is  regarded  as  an  association  of 
five  or  more  individuals  acting  as  a  unit  (Gould,  1974b).  In  this 
study  we  encountered  both  monospecific  and  mixed-species 
flocks.  We  did  not  see  any  large  associations  of  seabirds  that 
were  not  feeding  flocks  (i.e.,  flocks  of  direct  migrants).  The 
following  analysis  deals  with  the  size,  abundance,  composition 
(species  and  family),  and  geographic  distribution  of  the 
14  feeding  flocks  we  encountered. 

Flock  Size  and  Abundance 

Flock  sizes  ranged  from  8  to  420  birds,  averaging 
148  birds  per  flock.  The  total  number  of  birds  in  feeding  flocks 
(N  =  2,070)  represented  56.5%  of  our  bird  sightings,  a  figure 
comparable  to  the  69.5%  found  in  893  flocks  by  POBSP  ( King, 
1970). 

The  smallest  flock  (N  =  8),  of  seven  white  terns  and  one 
brown  noddy,  occurred  in  the  Gilbert  Islands  on  8  October. 
The  largest  flock  (3  October  in  the  Phoenix  Islands)  was 
monospecific  (420  sooty  terns).  The  second  largest  (N  =  408) 


243 


contained  7  species  and  was  predominantly  composed  of 
wedge-tailed  shearwaters  (8695  )  and  unidentified  noddies.  It 
was  encountered  on  13  October  adjacent  to  Pohnpei.  Three 
environmental  factors  undoubtedly  contributed  to  the  size  and 
diversity  of  this  flock: 

/.  The  flock  was  near  a  high  island  at  07°N.  within  the 
Equatorial  Countercurrent  boundaries  (ca.  4°N  and  9°N ).  where 
particularly  rich  upwellings  provide  feeding  grounds  for  both 
fish  and  birds  (Ashmole  &  Ashmole,  1967:  Gould,  1974a); 

2.  Flying  fish,  considerably  more  abundant  compared  to 
the  previous  3  days,  indicated  increased  productivity;  and 

3.  The  flock  was  attracted  to  masses  of  predatory  fish 
(primarily  tunas)  vigorously  leaping  from  the  water,  causing 
the  water  to  "boil." 

Flock  Composition 

Five  families  (Laridae.  Procellariidae.  Fregatidae,  Sulidae, 
Phaethontidae ),  1 2  species,  and  3  unidentifiable  groupcategories 
were  represented  in  feeding  flocks.  Sooty  terns  dominated 
the  feeding  flocks,  followed  numerically  by  noddies  and  wedge- 
tailed  shearwaters  (Fig.  7;  Tables  5,7).  These  three  species 
groups  accounted  for  95%  of  all  birds  seen  in  flocks. 

Sooty  terns  participated  in  71.4%  of  all  flocks  (Table  7).  a 
similar  proportion  to  that  found  by  POBSP  (76.0%)  over  a 
longer  time  frame  (King,  1970).  White  terns  were  found  in 
57%  of  the  flocks,  noddies  (primarily  brown  noddy)  in  38%, 
and  wedge-tailed  shearwaters  in  29%. 

White  terns  were  also  regular,  though  minor,  members  of 
pelagic  feeding  flocks,  found  in  57%  of  all  flocks  and 
representing  2%  of  total  numbers  (Table  7,  Fig.  7).  King 
( 1970)  found  that  white  terns  participated  in  9%  of  flocks  and 
noted  that  the  relatively  high  flocking  tendency  of  white  terns 


lie.  7.    Relative  abundance  >>i  spe*.  us  ..i  -,|x\  io  groups  loniul  in  .ill  feeding 
flocks  (N  =  14).  Total  numbei  ol  birds  was  -.(172  (\  =  I4S). 


was  of  interest  since  this  species  had  been  thought  to  be  a 
solitary  feeder.  Our  data  also  suggest  that  the  white  tern 
commonly  joins  mixed-species  feeding  flocks. 

White  terns  are  generally  more  solitary  on  land  and  at  sea 
and  have  not  been  found  to  exhibit  such  a  high  rate  of  flock 
participation  (57.1%)  as  we  observed  (King,  1970).  This 
species,  however,  joined  flocks  only  in  small  numbers.  Overall. 
five  white  terns  on  our  cruise  joined  over  half  the  flocks,  but 
their  total  numbers  within  flocks  accounted  for  only  2.1% 
(Fig.  7;  Table  7). 

Geographic  Distribution 

We  encountered  feeding  flocks  in  Regions  I  through  IV 
(Table  5).  viz..  in  the  Pacific  Ocean  from  150°W  to  158°E 
longitude.  We  saw  no  flocks  from  Pohnpei  westward  to 
Singapore. 

We  found  only  one  flock,  composed  of  85  sooty  terns,  in 
the  Line  Islands.  More  than  half  the  flocking  birds  were  within 
the  Phoenix  Islands  (Table  5).  where  the  highest  seabird 
populations  and  greatest  species  diversity  were  found.  Great 
frigatebirds  joined  flocks  only  in  the  Phoenix  Islands. 

In  Region  III  (Gilbert  Islands),  sooty  terns,  brown  noddies, 
and  white  terns  were  the  only  species  present  in  feeding  flocks. 
Sooty  terns  and  brown  noddies  accounted  for  92%  of  flocking 
birds  in  this  area  (Table  5). 

Region  IV  (Micronesia)  was  relatively  rich  in  feeding 
flocks  that  contained  several  species  not  encountered  elsewhere: 
stercorariids,  Kermadec  and  Bulwer"s  petrel.  Audubon's 
shearwaters,  and  white-tailed  tropicbirds. 

The  feeding  flocks  we  observed  were  found  in  areas 
known  to  be  nutrient-rich.  In  broad  terms,  latitudes  north  of 
10°N  and  south  of  10°S  are  poor  in  nutrients.  The  zone  in- 
between,  especially  from  04  or  05°N  to  09  or  1 0°N  ( Equatorial 
Countercurrent)  and  from  00  to  09  or  10°S.  is  considerably 
richer  in  plankton  and  schools  of  small  fish  and  tuna  (Ashmole 
&  Ashmole.  1967).  Superimposed  on  this  general  pattern  are 
local  upwellings  of  plankton  or  "fronts"  that  occur  close  to 
islands  and  arc  particularly  evident  between  0 1  °30'S  and  05°N 
(King  &  Hida.  1957). 

The  geographic  distribution  of  our  feeding  flocks  fits  these 
general  patterns  (Fig.  8).  Their  latitudinal  limits  were07°N  and 
07°S.  At  02°S.  within  the  plankton  bloom  on  either  side  of  the 
equator,  we  encountered  a  feeding  flock  of  153  birds.  Rocks 
were  more  frequent  around  island  clusters.  We  saw  four  flocks 
each  close  to  the  Phoenix  and  Gilbert  Groups,  and  the  day  our 
ship  arrived  at  05°N  (13  October,  south  of  Pohnpei!  we 
immediately  observed  a  substantial  increase  in  flying  fish. 
From  04°N  to  07°N,  we  encountered  3  feeding  flocks  of  223. 
22.  and  408  birds,  respectively.  The  dearth  of  fish.  and.  hence, 
seabirds.  north  of  10°N  was  particularly  evident.  Not  only 
were  there  no  feeding  flocks,  there  was  a  substantial  decrease 
m  (he  number  of  birds  compared  to  all  other  Pacific  areas 
(Table  1 ). 

We  saw  no  flocks  in  southeast  Asia,  where  total  numbers 
of  birds  were  low.  Here  we-encountered  complicating  factors 
due  to  heavy  pressures  from  commercial  and  subsistence 
fisheries  and  other  human  population  factors,  which  override 
changes  in  oceanography  that  are  associated  with  the  continental 


244 


shelf.  Southeast  Asia  has  long  been  recognized  as  an  outstanding 
area  for  fish  and.  until  the  last  few  decades,  was  similarly  rich 
in  seabird  colonies  (Nelson.  1978). 

Regional  Discussions 

Region  I  (457  birds.  26  species.  7  families) 

Region  1  (Fig.  1 )  begins  with  the  waters  between  the  Line 
Islands  and  Hawaii  north  to  14°N.  The  Line  Islands  are  a 
scattered  group  of  five  atolls,  five  islands,  and  two  submerged 
reefs  straddling  the  equator  between  06°N  and  12°S  latitude, 
and  162°  and  150°W  longitude.  They  are  all  low  islands  with 
extremely  varied  ecology  ranging  from  barren,  tropical  deserts 
with  scarcely  any  vascular  plants  to  lush  forests  of  coconut 
palms  and/or  indigenous  vegetation. 

All  except  three  are  uninhabited  and  thereby  serve  as 
suitable  habitats  for  tropical  seabirds.  Together  with  the 
Phoenix  Islands,  they  constitute  the  largest  assemblages  of 
breeding  tropical  seabirds  in  the  Pacific,  both  in  species  diversity 
and  abundance.  Christmas  Island,  with  18  species  of  breeding 
seabirds.  is  one  of  the  richest  seabird  islands  in  the  world 
(Ashmole  &  Ashmole,  1967;  Garnett,  1983),  due  in  part  to 
equatorial  upw  ellings  and  plankton  associated  with  the  seasonal 
movements  of  the  North  and  South  Equatorial  Currents  and 
Countercurrents  (King  &  Hida,  1957;  Ashmole  &  Ashmole, 
1967). 

Overall,  we  found  greater  seabird  diversity  and  density  in 
the  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands  (Tables  1,2,4).  Two  major  groups 
of  birds  were  most  abundant  in  Region  I:  shearwaters/petrels 
and  terns.  Of  minor  importance  numerically  were  boobies  and 
storm-petrels  (Table  3).  Of  interest  is  the  high  proportion  of 
resident  breeders  and  wintering  birds  (Fig.  3). 


The  1982-1983  anomalous  warm  waters  associated  with 
the  El  Nino  Southern  Oscillation  severely  disrupted  seabird 
breeding  on  Christmas  Island  (Schreiber  &  Schreiber,  1984). 
Furthermore,  feral  cats,  developmental  threats,  and  increased 
poaching  associated  with  expanding  human  populations  arc 
ongoing  problems  on  Christmas,  and  these  affect  the  numbers 
of  birds  seen  at-sea  in  the  area  (Gilbert  and  Ellice  Islands  Gov., 
1974;  Garnett,  1983;  Teeb*aki,  personal  communication). 

In  the  Line  Islands,  we  extended  the  known  range  of  herald 
petrel  and  added  sightings  of  Cook's  petrel  (six)  and  Stejneger's 
petrel  (two),  both  rarely  recorded  in  the  area. 

Region  11  ( 1 ,796  birds.  24  species,  6  families) 

The  Phoenix  Islands  (Fig.  1)  form  a  relatively  compact 
group  of  eight  low  islands  lying  from  03  to  05°S.  Most  are  dry 
and  waterless.  All  except  Canton  are  uninhabited  and  harbor, 
like  the  Line  Islands,  some  of  the  richest  and  largest  seabird 
colonies  in  the  world.  They  lie  within  the  boundaries  of  the 
South  Equatorial  Current  (04°N  to  ca.  10°S),  a  region  rich  in 
plankton  and  associated  fish  schools  (King  &  Hida,  1957; 
Ashmole  &  Ashmole,  1967). 

At-sea  bird  observations  were  dominated  by  sooty  terns 
(96Vr  of  total),  with  procellariids  next  in  abundance  (Table  3). 
Small  numbers  of  frigatebirds.  boobies,  and  storm-petrels 
occurred,  as  in  Region  I  (Table  2).  Resident  breeders, 
nonbreeding  visitors  and  direct  migrants  were  all  well- 
represented  (Fig.  4).  The  highest  density  of  any  bird  on  this 
cruise  was  in  this  area — sooty  terns,  at  32.45/10  km2. 

In  the  Phoenix  Islands  we  recorded  a  range  extension  of 
the  little  shearwater,  and  added  three  sight  records  of  Cook's 
petrel,  and  nine  of  wedge-tailed  shearwaters  (Table  6).  Because 
of  the  remoteness  and  unsuitability  of  the  Phoenix  Islands  for 


Northern 

Mariana 

Islands 


Marshall    Islands 


Papua  New  Guinea 


|»»»|     ranrse  wm  ■uumiumb 

fl — ^      POLrTICM  tiiu.c.".. 

[~T"1       CHUUi    TB»C«.««*P<I»«  KOWOltv 


J,.s 


Fig.  8.    Geographic  distribution  of  feeding  flocks  (dots). 


245 


human  settlement  (Howland  and  Baker  are  US  National  Wildlife 

Refuges,  and  Birnie,  McKean.  and  Phoenix  Islands  are  Kiribati 
Wildlife  Refuges),  its  seabirds  appear  reasonably  safe  from 
disturbance  for  the  present. 

Region  III  (495  birds.  13  species,  5  families) 

The  Gilbert  Islands  (Fig.  1 )  stretch  in  a  compact  arc  from 
03°17'N  to  02°38'S  latitude  and  from  176°49'E  to  172°48'E 
longitude.  They  compose  a  single  archipelago  of  1 1  atolls  and 
5  reef  islands,  forming  a  southerly  extension  of  the  Marshall 
Islands. 

All  the  Gilbert  Islands  are  populated,  some  heavily.  Since 
the  I-Kiribati  have  long  utilized  seabirds  and  their  eggs  for 
food,  species  sensitive  to  human  disturbance  (shearwaters, 
petrels,  boobies,  tropicbirds)  are  absent.  The  primary  breeding 
species  are  tree-nesters  such  as  brown  noddies  and  white  terns 
(Table  4). 

Our  observations  were  dominated  by  larids  (Table  3). 
Brown  noddies  (48% )  and  sooty  terns  (219c)  composed  929c  of 
(locking  birds.  With  the  exception  of  a  few  boobies,  most  other 
birds  were  nonbreeding  visitors  (Table  4).  Migrants  were 
absent  (Fig.  3).  We  also  provide  additional  sightings  of  such 
rarities  in  the  region  as  Cook's  petrel  ( 1 ).  Kermadec  petrel  (2), 
south  polar  skua  (5),  and  wedge-tailed  shearwater  (213) 
(Table  6). 

Region  IV  (799  birds,  18  species,  10  families) 

Our  cruise  track  passed  south  of  the  districts  of  Kosrae  and 
Pohnpei,  then  north  of  Truk,  Yap,  and  Belau  (04°N  to  10°N 
latitude,  163°E  to  138°E  longitude).  Micronesia  contains 
fewer  people  on  far  more  islands  than  the  Gilberts.  However, 
fishing  fleets  from  several  foreign  countries  are  exploiting  their 
oceanic  waters,  and  the  presence  of  even  a  few  people  on  an 
islet  deters  many  seabird  species  from  successful  breeding. 

Ourobservations  from  the  Caroline  Islands  were  dominated 
by  sooty  terns  and  noddies  ( 52%  of  birds  seen),  but  procellariids 
and  boobies  were  represented  in  fair  numbers.  Skuas  first 
appeared  here,  along  with  the  only  migrant  duck.  The  wedge- 
tailed  shearwater  attained  a  density  of  2.93  birds/10  km- 
( Tabic  2).  Our  observations  of  brown  boobies  suggest  the 
possible  existence  of  a  colony  on  Magur  Islet,  Namonuito 
Atoll,  in  the  District  of  Truk. 

Region  V  ( 34  birds.  6  species.  4  families) 

The  Philippine  Sea  and  Basin  (Fig.  2)  exhibited  the  lowest 
biodiversity  and  species  densities  (Tables  1-4)  of  the  five 
Pacific  regions.  This  relatively  small  area,  little-known 
ornithological  lv  and  with  no  islands  for  hundreds  of  kilometers. 
stretches  west  of  the  Marianas  to  the  Philippines  (at  11°N 
latitude, from  136°E  to  125°E longitude).  The  nearest  landfalls 
arc  the  Marianas  to  the  northwest.  Belau,  New  Guinea,  and  the 
Moluccas  (Indonesia)  to  the  south,  and  the  Philippines  to  the 
w  est.  Plankton  productivity  and  fish  populations  arc  known  to 
be  considerably  poorer  in  tropical  waters  north  of  09°N  than 
further  south  (Ashmole  &  Ashmole,  1967).  Our  sightings  of 
six  streaked  shearwaters  suggest  that  the  southerly  migration 
corridor  for  this  species  lies  entirely  cast  of  the  Philippines. 


Region  \  I  (22  birds.  4  species.  6  families) 

The  Bohol  (Mindanao)  and  Sulu  Seas  stretch  from  125°E 
to  1 17°E.  Seabird  densities  were  low.  Phalaropes.  not  previously 
encountered  on  our  cruise,  accounted  for  over  half  the  total  bird 
count  (Table  3).  A  few  larids,  skuas,  brown  noddies,  and 
wedge-tailed  shearwaters  (our  most  western  observations) 
completed  the  list.  The  proportions  of  resident  breeders, 
nonbreeding  visitors,  and  direct  migrants  were  equal  (Fig.  4). 
Elevated  human  populations  in  the  Philippines  have  undoubtedly 
reduced  seabird  numbers. 

Region  VII  (65  birds,  8  species.  5  families) 

Our  cruise  track  passed  through  the  South  China  Sea 
between  07°N  to  01°N  latitude  and  117°Eto  104°E  longitude. 
The  route  passed  from  the  Balabac  Strait  (southwestern 
Philippine  Islands)  indirectly  to  Singapore  (Fig.  2).  These 
waters,  the  most  heavily  polluted  of  the  trip  ( see  Chapter  2.  this 
vol.),  are  heavily  fished  commercially,  and  human  population 
densities  around  their  periphery  are  high.  Seabirds  were 
sparse.  As  with  Region  VI.  phalaropes  contributed  half  of  the 
total.  Migrant  stercorariids  formed  the  next  most  common  bird 
grouping;  since  stercorariid  records  are  few  from  this  area,  our 
observations  of  1 2  birds  of  at  least  2  species  add  to  their  known 
dispersal  areas. 

Gulls  and  terns  were  in  surprisingly  few  numbers, 
considering  that  almost  20  species  occur  in  the  South 
China  Sea.  We  recorded  Caspian,  bridled,  and  crested 
terns  (and  a  few  unidentified  larids)  in  very  small  numbers. 
Resident  breeders  and  nonbreeding  visitors  numbered  only 
one  species  each,  and  there  were  four  species  of  migrants 
(Fig.  3). 

During  our  indirect.  9-day  passage  across  the  South  China 
Sea  (23-31  October)  we  encountered  approximately  150  land 
birds  (including  40  raptors),  totaling  at  least  20  species  (Ellis 
et  ah,  1990  and  Subchapter  3.6,  this  vol.).  The  presence  of 
owls,  nightjars,  falcons,  a  large  crake,  and  small  forest  birds 
provided  a  highly  interesting  replacement  for  the  expected 
terns,  gulls,  and  other  seabirds. 

This  area  is  little  known  ornithologically,  at  least  in 
English  publications  (Delacour&Mayr.  1946;  Delacour.  1947; 
Anon..  1975;  Jing-Xiam  &  Zi-Yu,  1975;  Nelson.  1978;  Hails. 
1987;  King  &  Dickinson.  1987).  We  added  three  parasitic 
jaegers  to  records  for  the  South  China  Sea  and  a  possible  range 
extension  of  the  masked  booby.  Unfortunately,  in  the  last  few 
decades  numerous  large  seabird  colonies  in  this  area  have  been 
destroyed  by  direct  human  predation  (Nelson,  1978)  but 
considerable  efforts  towards  conservation  of  islands,  reefs, 
bays,  and  varied  habitats  are  on-going  commitments  by  all 
countries  concerned,  assisted  by  international  agencies  (UNEP, 
I984a,b;  IUCN.  1988a,b). 

This  First  US-USSR  Central  Pacific  Expedition  resulted  from 
the  efforts  of  main  people  in  the  United  States  and  the  Soviet  Union. 
On  the  American  side,  the  primary  organization  and  financial  support 
wore  from  the  US  Fish  &  Wildlife  Service.  We  especially  appreciate 
the  efforts  of  Harold  J.  O'Connor,  Director,  Patuxent  Wildlife  Research 
Center  and  Steve  Kohl  (Office  of  International  Affairs).  We  thank 
H.  Randolph  Perry  for  suggesting  and  encouraging  our  participation 
in  the  expedition,  Paul  Sykes  for  willingly  assuming  the  Michigan 


246 


responsibilities  of  CBK  during  the  long  voyage,  James  Hines,  Brett 
Hoover,  and  Lois  Loges  for  computer  programming  assistance,  and 
Bonnie  J.  Fancher  for  help  in  manuscript  preparation.  The  paper 
benefitted  from  the  comments  of  D.  Ainley.  W.  King,  and  P.  Gould. 

AKK  thanks  the  other  members  of  the  ICBP  1990  Line  and 
Phoenix  Islands  Expedition  (M.  and  A.  Garnett,  G.  Wragg.  J.  Phillips, 
and  M.  Linsley )  for  use  of  our  collective  at-sea  data.  She  also  extends 
special  thanks  to  Mr.  O'Connor  for  financial  support  during  preparation 
of  the  manuscript. 

On  the  Soviet  side,  it  is  a  great  pleasure  to  thank  Professor 
Alia  V.  Tsyban,  Goskomgidromet,  who  as  leader  of  the  expedition 


provided  help,  interest,  friendship,  and  outstanding  hospitality  during 
the  voyage.  Captain  Oleg  A.  Rostovtsev  and  his  crew  (especially  the 
navigators)  of  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev  provided  an  excellent 
observation  platform  and  abided  our  frequent  imposition  for  position 
fixes  from  their  satellite  and  Loran  C  navigation  systems  and 
hydrographic  charts.  Yevgeniy  N.  Nelepov  and  Yuri  L.  Volodkovich 
provided  much  assistance  during  the  voyage,  and  Boris  Sirenko  and 
Boris  Alexandrov  willingly  shared  their  knowledge  of  benthic  and 
pelagic  organisms.  Our  contacts  with  our  Soviet  colleagues  would 
have  been  far  less  stimulating  without  the  translation  skills  of 
Valeriya  M.  Vronskaya  and  Svetlana  V.  Petrovskaya. 


3.6     Evidence  for  a  Major  Fall  Land  Bird 

Migration  Corridor  Across  the  South  China 
Sea  from  Indo-China  to  the  Greater  Sunda 
Islands 

DAVID  H.  ELLIS.  ANGELA  K.  KEPLER,  and  CAMERON  B.  KEPLER 

US  Fish  &  Wildlife  Senice,  Patu.xent  Wildlife  Research  Center,  Laurel,  Maryland,  USA 


Introduction 

Until  1960,  bird  migration  corridors  in  eastern  Asia  were 
poorly  known  (Wetmore,  1926;  Delacour,  1947;  McClure, 
1974;  Medway  &  Wells,  1976).  In  southeast  Asia,  however, 
the  geography  of  the  land  masses  surrounding  the  South  China 
Sea  seems  to  create  natural  funnels  that  should  concentrate 
migrant  land  birds  into  three  primary  fall  corridors.  Important 
flight  paths  along  some  of  these  routes  have  recently  been 
discovered. 

It  is  known  that  migrants  from  Japan  and  eastern  China 
island-hop  south  through  the  Philippines  (Wetmore.  1926; 
McClure,  1974),  with  Ng  ( 1978)  presenting  evidence  that  barn 
swallows  (Hirundo  rustica)  move  directly  from  mainland 
China  to  the  Philippines.  McClure  ( 1974)  asserted  that  many 
migrants  passing  through  the  Philippines  to  Borneo  fly  west 
from  Palawan,  then  south  to  Borneo.  Simpson  (1983a,b) 
encountered  hundreds  of  migrant  birds  at  the  Tembungo  offshore 
oil  drilling  platform  near  the  northeastern  tip  of  Borneo  (Fig.  1 ) 
during  the  fall  migration  of  1981.  Although  he  reported  these 
observations  as  evidence  of  a  passage  directly  across  the  South 
China  Sea,  his  location  near  Balabac  Strait  also  suggests  that 
these  migrants  could  have  been  moving  south  from  the 
Philippines. 

Geography  suggests  that  many  migrant  land  birds  in 
Burma  and  western  Thailand  would  move  south  along  the 
Malay  Peninsula,  a  pathway  known  to  be  important  ( McClure, 
1974;  Medway  &  Wells,  1976;  Hails,  1987),  and  thence  across 
the  narrow  Straits  of  Malacca  to  Sumatra.  However,  migrants 
from  east  Thailand  as  well  as  those  from  China,  Laos,  and 


Vietnam,  moving  down  the  Indo-China  Peninsula  would 
naturally  converge  south  of  the  Mekong  River  Delta  on 
Mui  Bai  Bung.  From  this  tip  of  the  Indo-China  Peninsula, 
birds  traveling  overland  must  fly  northwest  into  Thailand 
before  proceeding  south.  Those  capable  of  a  relatively  short 
(ca.  400  km)  overwater  flight  can  fly  southwest  across  the  Gulf 
of  Thailand  toward  the  Malay  Peninsula,  a  route  portrayed  by 
McClure  (1974)  and  Hails  (1987)  as  a  minor  pathway  for  the 
migrants  from  Indo-China. 

McClure  (1968,  in  McClure,  1974)  illustrated  a  coastal 
migration  route  from  Taiwan  to  northern  Vietnam,  thence 
south,  crossing  the  South  China  Sea  to  Borneo,  another  route 
suggested  by  geography.  However,  he  provides  scant  evidence 
for  such  a  corridor  and  no  evidence  that  migrants  are 
concentrated  at  Mui  Bai  Bung.  McClure  ( 1 974)  discussed  a  fall 
passage  of  willow  warblers  (Phylloscopus  sp.)  across  the  South 
China  Sea  to  Sarawak  without  offering  details  on  their  point  of 
origin  north  of  the  sea.  Simpson  (Wells,  personal 
communication  and  in  prep.)  reported  a  substantial  fall 
movement  of  land  birds  ( 36  species )  in  the  Terengganu  oil  field 
(ca.  05°25'N,  105°13'E,  see  Fig.  1 ).  Although  this  location  is 
only  about  200  km  east  of  the  Malay  Peninsula  and  west  of  a 
direct  route  to  Borneo,  Simpson's  records  provide  the  best 
evidence  to  date  of  a  direct  South  China  Sea  crossing.  The  birds 
observed  by  Simpson  (1983a)  at  the  Tembungo  oil  terminal 
could  have  come  from  Vietnam,  as  he  suggests,  but  the  source 
of  these  migrants  is  clouded  by  their  proximity  to  the  Philippines. 
Although  biologists  from  the  Chinese  Academy  of  Science  and 
the  Beijing  Natural  History  Museum  (Anon.,  1974)  noted 
44  species  of  land  birds  during  1974  surveys  of  islets  in  the 


247 


South  China  Sea 


Fig.l.  Geography  of  the  southern  half  of  the  South  China  Sea  showing  bird 
survey  locations.  Numbered  segments  are  bird  location  survey 
locations  for  R/V  Akademik  Korolev,  23-310ctober  1988. 

northern  two-thirds  of  the  South  China  Sea,  demonstrating  the 
potential  for  long-distance  (ca.  1,000  km)  migration,  they  did 
not  demonstrate  that  a  corridor  for  land-bird  migrants  exists 
further  south  between  Vietnam  and  Borneo.  In  this  paper,  we 
present  data  from  the  South  China  Sea  that  strongly  support  the 
presence  of  such  a  migration  route. 

Study  Area  and  Methods 

We  encountered  migrant  land  birds  during  our 
23-31  October  1988  indirect  passage  (Fig.  1)  from  Balabac 
Strait  to  Singapore  on  the  Soviet  research  vessel  Akademik 
Korolev.  While  in  transit,  we  observed  birds  during  dawn-to- 
dusk  seabird  surveys  from  the  flying  bridge  (12  m  above  sea 
le\  el ).  During  a  3-day  period  while  the  ship  was  anchored  or 
drifting  without  power  to  conduct  oceanographic  research 
(Fig.  1,  Station  13;06°01'N,  106°55'E),  we  conducted  periodic 
v.  alking  inspections  of  the  ship  (usually  at  half-hour  intervals) 
and  searched  the  ship  each  night  by  flashlight  to  count  roosting 
birds.  Five  raptors  anil  several  barn  swallows  were  captured  by 
hand  (primarily  at  night)  and  examined  for  physical  condition. 

Results  and  Discussion 

During  our  9-day  passage,  we  encountered  about  1 50  land 
buds  1 121  by  conservative  count,  84  minimum  count,  Table  1 1 
representing  14  families.  Almost  all  were  migrants  that  winter 
(at  least  in  part)  south  of  the  South  China  Sea.  Most  of  these 
birds  (9ft  by  conservative  count )  arrived  on  the  ship  during  the 
!  da)  period  while  we  were  stationary  (Fig.  1,  Station  13) 
around  350  km  southeast  of  the  southern  tip  of  [ndo-China. 
The  presence  oi  land  buds  at  (Ins  location  suggests  that  they 
were  in  passage  across  the  South  China  Sea  from  Indo-Chin.i 
to  the  ( ireater  Sunda  Islands.  The  low  bird  counts  seen  before 


arriving  at  and  after  leaving  this  location  (Table  2)  suggest  that 
this  spot  lies  on  a  rather  narrow  migratory  pathway  although, 
alternately,  birds  may  have  been  reluctant  to  approach  a  moving 
vessel.  Simpson's  1982  observations  (Wells,  in  prep.),  made 
in  the  Terengganu  oil  field  (Fig.  1 )  very  near  our  cruise  track, 
suggested  that  he  was  sampling  the  same  corridor  we  visited; 
if  so,  the  pathway  may  be  somewhat  wider  than  we  detected. 

The  number  of  birds  we  observed  (Tables  1,2)  is  small 
when  compared  with  record  counts  for  well-known  migration 
pathways.  However,  our  visit  was  brief  and  probably  too  late 
for  detecting  the  bulk  of  migrating  land  birds.  Simpson's 
( 1983a)  dates  for  six  of  nine  frequently  encountered  land  birds 
near  northeastern  Borneo  fell  before  the  time  of  our  visit,  and. 
just  as  important,  migrating  land  birds  most  often  aggregate 
where  land  and  water  configurations  encourage  them  to  collect 
(e.g..  on  north  or  south  projecting  peninsulas).  By  contrast,  we 
were  on  the  open  sea  where  birds  are  much  less  likely  to 
concentrate.  Considering  these  factors,  it  seems  likely  that 
adequate  spatial  and  temporal  sampling  will  reveal  many 
thousands  of  land  birds  moving  south  from  Indo-China  across 
the  South  China  Sea. 

Although  our  records  and  those  of  Simpson's  (Wells,  in 
prep.)  demonstrate  that  a  sizable  migration  is  probably  normal 
across  the  South  China  Sea.  we  should  mention  an  alternate 
hypothesis  that  may  help  explain  the  presence  of  these  birds 
where  and  when  we  observed  them.  First,  our  passage  occurred 
when  Typhoon  Ruby  was  ravaging  the  Philippine  Islands 
(Anon..  1989).  Although  we  did  not  encounter  heavy  seas  or 
strong  winds,  some  of  the  birds  we  observed  may  have  been 
forced  out  to  sea,  if  nonmigratory.  or  shunted  away  from  their 
normal  migration  route,  if  migratory,  by  the  storm.  However, 
most  of  the  birds  we  observed  far  from  land  (Table  3)  are 
known  to  be  strong  migrants.  The  four  hawks  tentatively 
identified  as  shikras  (Accipiter  badius)  and  crested  goshaw  ks 
(A.  trivirgatus),  and  the  dove  (Streptopelia  sp. )  are  the  only  real 
surprises,  although  a  few  others  in  Table  3  would  not  be 
expected  this  far  from  land. 

Flight  direction  may  give  some  indication  of  the  likelihood 
of  either  hypothesis.  If  the  birds  were  displaced  migrants,  they 
would  probably  have  been  heading  southwest  (i.e..  away  from 
the  storm).  If  in  passage  from  a  concentration  zone  on  the  Indo- 
China  Peninsula  to  Borneo,  they  should  have  been  heading 
southeast  to  encounter  our  vessel.  If.  as  we  observed,  the 
raptors  (33'f  of  all  land  birds)  were  foraging  at  sea  (Ellis  etal., 
1 990 )  rather  than  migrating,  there  would  likely  be  no  consistent 
trend  in  their  flight  direction.  In  Fig.  2.  there  is  no  clear  east- 
west  trend  in  arriving  or  departing  flights.  However,  although 
the  data  are  very  few  strong  southward  and  westward 
components  are  e\  idem.  In  constructing  Fig.  2.  we  eliminated 
directional  readings  for  birds  seen  on  cruise  track  segments 
1-7  and  20-30  because  these  segments  were  near  enough  to 
land  (i.e.,  within  1 00  km )  that  the  birds'  flight  directions  could 
have  been  influenced  by  sight  or  sign  of  nearby  land.  In 
addition,  all  Right  bearings  could  have  been  influenced  h\  the 
presence  of  the  ship. 

Physical  condition  of  the  birds  w  e  obsen  ed  mas  also  be  an 
indicator  of  the  regularity  with  which  this  migration  route  is 
used.  If  a  high  proportion  of  the  know  n  o\  erseas  migrants  were 


248 


TABLE  1 

Land  bird  totals  for  R/V  Akademik  Korolev  cruise  track  segments  and  stationary  watches  in  the  South 

China  Sea,  October  1988. 

No.  Land  Birds  Observed' 


Date 


23 


24 


25 


Station/Segment2 

Duration 

All  Land 

Length 

ofObs. 

Rapti 

3rs 

Non- 

•raptors 

Birds 

Number 

(km) 

(min.) 

Min. 

Cons. 

Min. 

Cons. 

Min. 

Cons. 

1 

38 

88 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2 

15 

45 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3 

6 

17 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

4 

67 

158 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

5 

14 

44 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

6 

19 

48 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

7 

49 

109 

0 

0 

1 

1 

1 

1 

8 

22 

50 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

9 

3 

11 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

10 

30 

67 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

11 

17 

38 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

12 

63 

143 

0 

0 

4 

4 

4 

4 

26-28  13  ca.  0  912  22  30  32  44  54  74 


28 

14 

ca.  0 

43 

1 

1 

0 

0 

1 

1 

15 

22 

10 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

16 

26 

78 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

17 

ca.  0 

195 

1 

4 

4 

8 

5 

12 

29 

18 

ca.  0 

105 

1 

1 

1 

4 

2 

5 

19 

ca.  0 

20 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

20 

25 

62 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

1 

21 

ca.  0 

80 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

30 

22 

ca.  0 

23 

1 

1 

3 

3 

4 

4 

23 

ca.  0 

IK) 

0 

0 

2 

4 

2 

4 

24 

ca.  0 

25 

0 

0 

0 

1 

0 

1 

25 

ca.  0 

95 

0 

1 

3 

3 

3 

4 

26 

ca.  0 

54 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

27 

ca.  0 

52 

0 

0 

3 

5 

3 

5 

28 

ca.  0 

30 

1 

1 

0 

0 

1 

1 

31 

28 

ca.  0 

15 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

29 

ca.  0 

15 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

30 

135 

280 

1 

1 

3 

3 

4 

4 

TOTALS 

3.022 

28 

40 

56 

81 

84 

121 

1  Because  accurate  bird  counts  were  sometimes  difficult  to  obtain  for  stationary  watches  (i.e..  some 
birds  remained  aboard  or  flew  about  the  ship  for  extended  periods),  we  report  both  the  minimum 
(min.)  number  of  birds  observed  (based  on  subtractive  values)  and  a  conservative  (cons.)  number 
based  primarily  on  new  arrivals.  The  actual  number  observed  is  believed  to  be  about  20%  higher  than 
the  conservative  count. 

:  Cruise  track  segment  locations  are  illustrated  in  Fig.  1. 


249 


TABLE  2 

Minimum  and  conservative  land  bird  counts  along  cruise  track  of  R/V  Akademik  Korolev  in  the 
South  China  Sea,  23-31  October  1988. ' : 


Species 

Small  juv.  accipiter  (Accipiter  sp. ) 

Ad.  Japanese  sparrow-hawk  (Accipiter  gularis) 

Ad.  shikra  (A.  badius)3 

Ad.  crested  goshawk  (A.  trivirgatusf 

Eagle/kite  (Accipitridae) 

Peregrine  falcon  (Falco  peregrinus) 

Oriental  scops  owl  (Otus  siiniaf 

Chinese  pond  heron  (Ardeola  bacchus) 

Watercock  {Gallicrex  cinerea) 

Dove  [Streptopelia  sp.)' 

Grey  nightjar  (Caprimulgus  indicus) 

Fork-tailed  swift  (Apus pacificus) 

Swift  (Apodidae) 

Dollarbird  (Eurystomus  orientalis) 

Barn  swallow  (Hirundo  rustica) 

Swallow  (Hirundo  sp. ) 

Ashy  minivet  (Pericrocotus  divaricatusf 

Lanceolated  Warbler  (Locustella  lanceolata)4 

Great  reed  warbler  (Acrocephalus  arundinaceus  i 

Warbler  (Acrocephalus  sp.) 

Arctic  warbler  (Phylloscopus  boreal  is) 

Flycatcher  (Ficedula  sp.) 

Brown  shrike  (Lanius  cristatus) 

Unidentified  passerines  or  remains 

TOTALS 


Segments  1-7 

Segments  8-19 

Segments  20-30 

(Oct. 

23-24) 

(Oct. 

25-29) 

(Oct 

.  29-3 1 ) 

.Jin. 

Cons. 

Min. 

Cons. 

Min. 

Cons. 

0 

0 

14 

24 

3 

3 

0 

0 

2 

2 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

-> 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2 

2 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

3 

3 

0 

0 

1) 

0 

2 

2 

0 

1 

1) 

0 

0 

0 

3 

3 

0 

0 

1 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

1 

1 

0 

0 

4 

4 

0 

0 

0 

0 

2 

2 

0 

0 

1 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

14 

29 

5 

10 

0 

0 

1 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

1 

1 

0 

0 

1 

1 

1 

1 

0 

0 

1 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

2 

1 

1 

0 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

0 

0 

2 

2 

0 

0 

0 

0 

6 

6 

1 

1 

0 

0 

5 

8 

0 

1 

1 

1 

66 

96 

17 

24 

'Cruise  track  segments  and  stations  are  illustrated  in  Fig.  1  and  described  in  Table  I . 

'Abbreviations  in  column  headings  are:   Min.  (minimum  count)  and  Cons,  (conservative  count)  as  explained  in  Table  I. 
Footnote  1 . 

"Because  these  birds  are  considered  non-migratory,  these  identifications  should  be  treated  as  tentative.  All  are  based  on 
nearby  visual  observations  aided  by  lOx  binoculars,  but  without  photographic  or  other  substantiation. 

individuals  of  these  species  were  deposited  in  the  US  National  Museum:  Oriental  scops  owl.  USNM  No.  607190;  Ashj 
minivet.  USNM  No.  607193;  and  Lanceolated  warbler,  spirit  specimen  (not  assigned  numbers  at  USNM l. 


in  good  body  condition  this  far  from  land,  it  is  more  tenable  to 
suppose  that  these  species  regularly  use  this  route.  In  Table  3, 
our  best  estimate  of  physical  condition  is  compared  for  all 
species  that  we  encountered  far  from  land.  We  know  from 
handling  a  few  captives,  and  infer  from  the  energetic  flight  of 
others,  that  the  raptors  and  the  barn  swallows  at  Station  13 
(Fig.  I )  were  in  good  physical  condition.  For  the  other  species, 
too  few  individuals  were  present  to  draw  firm  conclusions,  but 
all  birds  of  most  species  appeared  to  be  in  good  condition. 

A  final  hypothesis  may  explain  the  presence  of  some  of  the 
raptors.  Many  were  opportunistically  foraging  at  sea.  During 
our  3-day  layover  dig.  I,  Station  13),  we  recorded  raptors 
perching  for  extended  periods,  roosting  nightly  on  the  ship,  and 


engaging  in  at  least  21  hunting  forays  (Ellis  et  ai.  1990).  Of 
14  forays  for  which  the  outcome  was  known,  13  (93%)  were 
successful.  Some  accipiters  even  used  the  ship's  deck  lights  to 
forage  at  night.  We  gathered  prey  remains,  totaling  at  least 
20  kills.  Two  species,  barn  swallow  and  brown  shrike  (Lcmius 
cristatus),  suffered  heavy  mortality  from  predation.  Of  14  barn 
swallows  (minimum  count)  observed  from  25-29  October,  at 
least  7  turned  up  as  prey.  Even  more  significant,  five  of  six 
(minimum  count)  brown  shrikes  seen  during  the  same  5-day 
period  were  observed  as  prey.  Simpson's  (1983a;  Wells,  in 
prep. )  observations  of  raptor  behavior  at  both  oil  fields  led  him 
to  conclude  that  Japanese  sparrow-hawks  were  hunting  and 
"commuting  between  nearby  rigs."  Our  observations  confirm 


250 


TABLE  3 

Physical  condition  and  migratory  status  of  land  birds  arriving  on  R/V  Akademik  Korolev,  25-29  October  1988,  South  China  Sea.1 


Physical 
Condition" 


Mobility  Classes2 


Taxon  [Number] 


Known  Known         Known 

Known     Over-water     Colonizer     Straggler 
Migrant       Migrant5       of  Islands    to  Islands     Comments 


Good 


Good 


Japanese  sparrow-hawk  + 

(Accipiter gularis)  [2] 

Shikra  (A.  badius)  [2]  + 


Common  migrant 


Western  population  is  highly  migratory; 
eastern  population  migratory  in  Malaysia 


Good  Crested  goshawk 

{A.  trivirgatus)  [2] 

Good  Peregrine  falcon 

{Falco peregrinus)  [3] 


Non-migrant  throughout  range 


Fatigued 

Watercock 

(Gallicrex  cinerea)  [  1  ] 

Good 

Dove  (Streptopelia  sp.)  [  1 

Emaciated 

Oriental  scops  owl 

(Otus  sunia)  [1] 

Good 

Gray  nightjar 

(Caprimulgus  indicus)  [  1 

Winters  in  Greater  Sunda  Islands  and  Celebes; 
very  few  records  as  straggler 


Strongly  migratory,  scatters  across  Malaysia  in 
winter 


Good  Fork-tailed  swift 

(Apus  pacificus)  [4] 

Good  Barn  swallow 

(Hirundo  rustica)  [29] 

Fatigued  Ashy  minivet  (Pericrocotus 

divaricatus)  [1] 

Fatigued  Lanceolated  warbler 

{Locustella  lanceolata)  [1  ] 


A  few  migratory  stragglers  recorded  as  far  east 
as  Marshall  Islands 

Winters  throughout  region  and  tropics 
worldwide 

Winters  on  larger  islands  of  Indonesia,  but  not 
on  islands  separated  by  large  bodies  of  water 

Winters  in  Greater  Sunda  Islands 


Good  Great  reed  warbler  (Ac ro- 

cephalus  arundinaceus)  [  1  ] 

Good  Brown  shrike 

[Lanius  cristatus)  [6] 


Common  migrant  in  Indonesia 


Common  migrant  to  Greater  Sunda  Islands; 
recorded  in  Palau 


!Data  are  included  only  for  that  portion  of  the  cruise  track  (stations  8-19)  where  the  ship  was  far  (>100  km)  from  land. 

"Symbols  in  these  columns:  +  =  yes.-  =  no.  Assignment  to  mobility  class  (i.e.,  regular  migrant  over  land  and  over  large  bodies  of  water 
>500  km.  colonizer  of  distant  land  masses  and  islands  as  a  breeding  bird,  straggler  either  on  migration  or  as  a  resident)  is  at  best  tentative 
for  some  species,  but  was  derived  from  information  in  Brown  &  Amadon  (1968),  Clements  (1978),  King  &  Dickinson  (1975),  Medway  & 
Wells  (1976),  and  Pratt  et  al.  (1987). 

'Physical  condition  was  reported  "Good"  if  bird  flew  well  and  was  adept  at  avoiding  capture  by  hand,  "Fatigued"  if  readily  captured  by 
hand,  and  "Emaciated"  if  sternum  was  sharply  protruding  upon  capture. 


251 


N 

i 


A.    ACCIPITERS   IN  =17) 


B    PASSERINES    and   SWIFTS     i  N  =  7  I 


o 


Fig. 


C.   BARN    SWALLOWS     IN=4I 

Arriving  and  departing  flight  directions  for  birds  seen  on  cruise  track 
segments  8-19  of  R/V  Akademik  Korolev,  26-29  Oclober  1988. 


that  the  raptors  were  opportunistically  using  our  stationary  ship 
for  perching,  roosting,  hunting,  and  eating.  When  the  ship  was 
moving  under  power,  however,  none  of  the  raptors  perched  for 
any  extended  period,  and  none  roosted  on  the  ship. 

From  all  available  evidence,  it  seems  most  likely  that  the 
birds  we  encountered  were  a  small  part  of  what  must  be  a 
si/able  wave  of  fall  migrants  on  their  way  across  the  South 
China  Sea.  The  configuration  of  the  land  masses  suggests  that 
the  point  of  departure  for  these  birds  was  the  southern  tip  of 
Indo-China;  however,  further  land-based  research  is  needed  to 
substantiate  the  point  of  origin  and  destination  of  birds  crossing 
the  South  China  Sea  to  Borneo.  Additional  work  at  sea  will  also 
be  helpful  in  determining  the  timing  and  magnitude  of  the 
migration,  as  well  as  corridor  w  idth.  Work  on  islands  in  the 
South  China  Sea  or  stationary  platforms  may  substitute  in  part 
for  the  at-sea  studies,  but  it  is  also  important  to  determine  body 
condition  of  birds  arriving  in  the  Greater  Sunda  Islands. 
Intensive  banding  operations  in  Vietnam,  at  sea.  and  in  Borneo 
could  reveal  much  about  survival  rates  and  all  other  aspects  of 
this  little-known  migration  route. 

This  project  was  part  of  the  First  US-USSR  Joint  Pacific 
Expedition  to  the  Pacific  Ocean  and  South  China  Sea.  We  express 
appreciation  to  the  agents  of  both  governments  who  made  our 
participation  possible.  We  especially  thank  Professor  Alia  V.  Tsyban 
(Chief  Scientist).  Harold  J.  O'Connor  (Director.  Patuxent  Wildlife 
Research  Center  and  US  organizer  of  the  expedition ).  Captain  Oleg  A. 
Rostovtsev,  and  our  many  Soviet  friends  whoenhancedourenjo)  ment 
of  the  trip.  Joe  Marshall  and  Ralph  Browning  assisted  in  specimen 
identification  at  the  Smithsonian  Institution.  Linda  J.  Miller.  Cath) 
Ellis,  and  Bonnie  Fancher  assisted  greatly  in  data  handling  and 
manuscript  preparation. 

The  following  people  commented  on  an  earh  version  of  this 
manuscript  and  thereby  compensated  for  our  inexperience  w  ith  the 
birds  of  the  South  China  Sea  region:  H.  Elliott  McClure.  Duncan 
Parish.  Philip  D.  Round.  Lucia  Liu  Severinghaus.  and  David  R.  Wells. 
We  appreciate  additional  editorial  comments  from  Mark  R.  Fuller. 
George  F.  Gee.  and  Gary  H.  Heinz. 


252 


Chapter  3  References 


Ainley,  D.  G.  &  Boekelheide,  R.  J.   ( 1983).   An  Ecological 

Comparison  of  Oceanic  Seabird  Communities  of  the  Souith 

Pacific  Ocean.  Stud.  Avian  Biol.  8.  2-23. 
Amerson.  A.  B.,  Jr.  ( 1969).  Ornithology  of  the  Marshall  and 

Gilbert  Islands.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  No.  127.  1-348. 
Anonymous  ( 1974).    Report  of  the  zoological  survey  of  the 

islands  of  the  South  China  Sea.  ACTA  Zoologica  Sin.  20(2), 

113-130. 
Anonymous  (1989).     Marine  weather  review.     Mariners 

Weather  Log  33(2),  40-50. 
AOU.  (1983).    Check-list  of  North  American  Birds.  6th  Ed. 

American  Ornithologists'  Union,  Washington,  D.C. 
AOU.  (1985).     Thirty-fifth  supplement  to  the  American 

Ornithologists'  Union  Check-list  of  North  American  Birds. 

Auk  102.  680-686. 
Arashkevich,  E.  G.  (1972).   Vertical  distribution  of  various 

trophic  groups  of  copepods  in  boreal  and  tropical  regions  of 

the  Pacific  Ocean.  Oceanology  12(2).  315.  (in  Russian) 
Ashmole,  N.  P.  &  Ashmole,  M.  J.  (1967).     Comparative 

feeding  ecology  of  seabirds  of  a  tropical  oceanic  island. 

PeabodyMus.  Nat.  Hist.  Yale  Univ.  Bull.  24.  1-131. 
Bailey,  S.  F.,  Pyle,  P.  &  Spear,  L.  B.  (1989).  Dark  Pterodroma 

petrels  in  the  North  Pacific:  Identification,  status,  and  North 

American  occurrence.  American  Birds  43.  400-415. 
Baker,  R.  H.  (1951).  The  avifauna  of  Micronesia:  Its  origin, 

evolution,  and  distribution.    Univ.  Kans.  Publ.  Mus.  Nat. 

Hist.  3(1).  1-359. 
Beklemishev.  K.  B.  (1973).    Ranges  of  tropical  far-neritic 

species.    In  Tropical  Zone  of  the  World  Ocean  and  the 

Global  Processes  Associated  with  It,  pp.  292-299.  Nauka 

P.  jlishers.  Moscow,  (in  Russian) 
Bloxham,  A.  ( 1925).  Diary  of  Andrew  Bloxham.  naturalist  of 

the  "Blonde"  on  her  trip  from  the  Hawaiian  Islands  from 

England,  1824-1825.  B.  P.  Bishop  Mus.  Spec.  Publ.  10. 
Boaden.  P.  J.  S.  &  Seed,  R.  (1985).  An  Introduction  to  Coastal 

Ecology.  Blackie  and  Son  Ltd.,  Glasgow  and  London.  218 

pp. 
Briggs.  K.  T„  Tyler,  W.  B..  Lewis,  D.  B.  &  Carlson,  D.  R. 

(1987).    Bird  communities  at  sea  off  California:    1975  to 

1983.  Stud.  Avian  Biol.  11.  74  pp. 
Brown,  L.  &  Amadon,  D.  ( 1968).  Eagles,  Hawks  and  Falcons 

of  the  World.  Country  Life  Books,  London. 
Chislenko.  L.  L.  (1968).    Nomograms  for  Determining  the 

Weight  of  Aquatic  Organisms  from  Body  Size  and  Shape. 

Nauka  Publishers.  Leningrad,  (in  Russian) 
Clapp.  R.  B.(  1967).  Line  Islands.  Unpublished  report.  32  pp. 

USNM,  Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington.  D.C. 
Clapp.  R.  B.  &  Sibley.  F.  C.  ( 1 967 ).  New  records  of  birds  from 

the  Phoenix  and  Line  Islands.  Ibis  109.  122-125. 
Clapp.  R.  B.  &  Sibley.  F.  C.  (1968).  Additional  new  records 

of  birds  from  the  Phoenix  and  Line  Islands.    Ibis  110. 

573-575. 
Clapp.  R.  B.  &  Sibley.  F.  C.  (1971a).  Notes  on  the  vascular 

flora  and  terrestrial  vertebrates  of  Caroline  Atoll.  Southern 

Line  Islands.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  145.  1-16. 


Clapp.  R.  B.&  Sibley.  F.  C.  (1971b).  The  vascular  flora  and 

terrestrial  vertebrates  of  Vostok  Island,  south-central  Pacific. 

Atoll  Res.  Bull.  144,  1-9. 
Clements,  J.F.I  1978).  Birds  of  the  world:  A  check  list.  Two 

Continents  Publishing  Group,  New  York. 
Crossin,  R.  S.  (1974).  The  storm-petrels  (Hydrobatidae).   In 

Pelagic  Studies  of  Seabirds  in  the  Central  and  Eastern 

Pacific  Ocean  (W.  B.  King,  ed.  ),  pp.  154-205. 
Day,  R.  A.,  Wehle,  D.  H.  S.  &  Coleman,  F.  C.  ( 1984).  Ingestion 

of  plastic  pollutants  by  marine  birds.    In  Proceedings  of 

the  Workshop  of  the  Fate  and  Impact  of  Marine  Debris, 

26-29  November  1984,  Honolulu,  Hawaii,  pp.  344-386. 

NOAA  Technical   Memorandum  SWEC-54,   NMFS, 

NOAA-TA,  US  Department  of  Commerce. 
Delacour,  J.  (1947).     Birds  of  Malaysia,    xvi  +  382     pp. 

Macmillan  Co.,  New  York. 
Delacour,  J.  &  Mayr,  E.  (1946).    Birds  of  the  Philippines, 

xv  +  309  pp.  Macmillan  Company,  New  York. 
Ellis,  D.  H.,  Kepler,  A.  K.  &  Kepler.  C.  B.  (1990).  Evidence 

for  a  fall  raptor  migration  pathway  across  the  South  China 

Sea.  J.  Raptor  Res.  24(1-2),  12-18. 
Engbring,  J.  (1983).    Avifauna  of  the  southwest  islands  of 

Palau.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  267,  1-22. 
Garnett,  M.  C.  (1983).     A  Management  Plan  for  Nature 

Consen'ation  in  the  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands.     Pt.  I: 

Description,  318  pp.;  Pts.  II,  III:   Policy  and  Recom- 
mendations. 131  pp. 
Garnett,  M.  C.  (1984).  Conservation  of  seabirds  in  the  South 

Pacific  region:  A  review.  ICBP  Tech.  Pub.  2,  547-557. 
Geinrikh,  A.  K.  (1960).    The  near-surface  plankton  of  the 

central  World  Ocean.  Oceanology  11.  (in  Russian) 
Geinrikh,  A.  K.  (1964).     On  the  surface  plankton  of  the 

northeastern  Pacific.     Trudy  Institute  of  Oceanology  AN 

SSSR  65,  77-94.  (in  Russian) 
Geinrikh.  A.  K.  (1968).    Quantitative  distribution  of  certain 

plankton  animals  in  the  western  Pacific  Ocean.  In  Plankton 

of  the  Pacific  Ocean.  Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers,  Moscow. 

(in  Russian) 
Gilbert  and  Ellice  Islands  Government.  (1974).  Line  Islands 

Expedition  report,  89  pp.   Unpublished  manuscript. 
Gill,  R.  E.  (1990).    Ecology  of  curlews  in  French  Polynesia 

during  spring.    In  Summary  of  the  Proceedings  from  the 

Workshop  on  Bristle-thighed  Curlews.  Anchorage.  Alaska 

(R.  E.  Gill  &  C.  M.  Handel,  eds.  ).  22  pp. 
Gorshkov.  S.  G.  (1974).    Atlas  of  the  Oceans.    The  Pacific 

Ocean.  Head  Department  of  Navigation  and  Oceanography, 

Ministry  of  Defense  of  the  USSR. 
Gould,  P.  J.  (1974a).     Introduction,  pp.   1-5.     In  Pelagic 

Studies  of  Seabirds  in  the  Central  and  Eastern  Pacific 

Ocean  (W.  B.  King,  ed.),  277  pp.     Smithson.  Contrib. 

Zool.  158. 
Gould.  P.  J.  (1974b).  Sooty  tern  (Stemafuscata),  pp.  6-52.  In 

Pelagic  Studies  of  Seabirds  in  the  Central  and  Eastern 

Pacific  Ocean  ( W.  B.  King.  ed.  ).  277  pp.  Smithson.  Contrib. 

Zool.   158. 


253 


Gould,  P.  J.  (1983).    Seabirds  between  Alaska  and  Hawaii. 

Condor  85,  286-291. 
Gould,  P.  J.  &  Forsell,  D.  J.  ( 1989).  Techniques  for  shipboard 

surveys  of  marine  birds.  US  Fish  Wildl.  Serv.  Tech.  Report 

25.  1-22. 
Gould,  P.  J.  &  King.  W.  B.  ( 1967).    Records  of  four  species 

of  Pterodroma  from  the  central  Pacific  Ocean.    Auk  84. 

591-594. 
Gould,  P.  J.,  King,  W.  B.  &  Sanger.  G.  A.  (1974).  Red-tailed 

tropicbird  {Phaethon   rubricauda),   pp.   206-231.   In 

Pelagic  Studies  of  Seabirds  in  the  Central  and  Eastern 

Pacific  Ocean  ( W.  B.  King.  ed.  ).  277  pp.  Smithson.  Contrib. 

Zool.  158. 
Grossman,  H.  &  Grossman,  H.  ( 1974).    Preliminary  Report 

(Birds).  In  Line  Islands  Expedition  Report,  August-October 

1974,  5  pp.     Gilbert  and  Ellice   Islands  Government. 

Unpublished  manuscript. 
Haile,  N.  S.  (1964).  SabakSoc.J.  11.  135-137. 
Hails.  C.(  1987).  Birds  of  Singapore,  168  pp.  Times  Editions, 

Singapore. 
Haney.  J.  C.  (1985).    Counting  seabirds  at  sea  from  ships: 

comments  on  interstudy  comparisons  and  methodological 

standardization.  Auk  102(4).  897-898. 
Harrison.  P.  (1985).     Seabirds:     An  Identification  Guide, 

448  pp.  Houghton  Mifflin  Company.  Boston. 
Herring,  J.  L.  (1961).     The  genus  Halobates  (Hemiptera, 

Gerridae).  Pac.  Insects  3(2-3).  223-305. 
Huber.  L.  N.  (1971).  Notes  on  migration  of  Wilson's  storm- 
petrel  {Oceanites  oceanicus)  near  Eniwetok  Atoll,  western 

Pacific  Ocean.  Notornis  18(  1 ).  38-42. 
Humphrey.  P.  S.  (1965).  An  ecological  survey  of  the  Central 

Pacific.  Smithson.  Year  1%5.  24-30. 
Hunt,  G.  L.,  Eppley.  Z.,  Burgeson.  B.  &  Squibb.  R.  (1981). 

Reproductive  ecology,  foods  and  foraging  areas  of  seabirds 

nesting  on  the  Pribilof  Islands,  1975-1979.  In  Final  Reports 

of  Principal  Investigators,  Vol.  12.  pp.   1-258.    NOAA. 

Boulder.  Colorado. 
ICBP.  ( 1990).  Unpublished  field  notes.  International  Council 

for  Bird  Protection  (ICBP)  1990  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands 

Expedition.  In  author's  possession. 
IUCN.    (1988a).    Coral  Reefs  of  the  World.  Vol.  2.  United 

Nations  Environmental   Program.  Intemation  Union  for 

Conservation  of  Nature  and  Natural  Resources.  Compiled 

by  C.  Sheppard  &  S.  M.  Wells.  389  pp. 
IUCN.    ( 1988b).    Coral  Reefs  of  the  World.  Vol.  3.  United 

Nations  Environmental  Program.  Intemation  Union  for 

Conservation  of  Nature  and  Natural  Resources.  Compiled 

by  C.  Sheppard  &  S.  M.  Wells.   329  pp. 
Jenkins,  1.  A.  F.  ( 1979).   Observations  on  the  wedge-tailed 

shearwater  {Puffinus  pacificus)  in  the  south-west  Pacific. 

Notornis  26.  331-348. 
Jing-Xian,  L.  &  Zi- Yu.  W.  ( 1 975 ).  The  red-footed  booby  in  the 

\isha  i  Paracel  I  Islands.  (Translated  from  Chinese  bj  [aian 

C.  On'.  )  Zool.  Mag.  (Dongwuxue  Zazhi)  3.  40. 
Kepler.  A.  K.  (1490).    ICBP  1990  Line  and  Phoenix  Islands 

1  \pedition. 20 February- 31  May  1990,  12pp.  Unpublished 

report,  Cambridge.  England. 


Kepler.  C.  B.,  Kepler.  A.  K.  &  Ellis.  D.  H.  ( 1992).  Ecological 

studies  on  Caroline  Atoll.  Republic  of  Kiribati,  south-central 

Pacific  Ocean.  Part  II.  Seabirds,  other  tenestrial  animals. 

and  conservation.  (Subchapter  1.  2,  this  volume). 
King.  B.  F.  &  Dickinson.  E.  C.  (1975).  A  Field  Guide  to  the 

Birds  of  South-East  Asia,  480  pp.    Houghton  Mifflin  Co.. 

Boston. 
King.  J.  E.  &  Hida.  T.  S.  ( 1957 ).  Zooplankton  abundance  in  the 

Central  Pacific.  Pt    II.     US  Fish  Wildl.  Serv.  Fish.  Bull. 

57(118),  365-395. 
King.  W.  B.  ( 1967).  Seabirds  of  the  Tropical  Pacific  Ocean. 

126  pp.  Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington.  D.C. 
King,  W.  B.  (1970).    The  Trade  Wind  Zone  Oceanography 

Pilot  Study.    Part  VII:    Observations  of  Sea  Birds,  March 

1964  to  June  1965,  136  pp.  US  Fish  Wildl.  Sen:  Spec.  Sci. 

Rep.  Fish.  586. 
King,  W.  B.  ( 1973).    Conservation  status  of  birds  of  central 

Pacific  islands.  Wilson  Bull.  85.  89-103. 
King.  W.  B.  (ed.)  (1974a).  Pelagic  Studies  of  Seabirds  in  the 

Central  and  Eastern  Pacific  Ocean.     Smithson.  Contrib. 

Zool.  158. 
King.  W.  B.  (1974b).     Wedge-tailed  shearwater  {Puffinus 

pacificus),  pp.  53-95.  In  Pelagic  Studies  of  Seabirds  in  the 

Central  and  Eastern  Pacific  Ocean,  (W.  B.  King.  ed). 

277  pp.  Smithson.  Contrib.  Zool.  158. 
Korshenko,  A.  N.  (1988).  Ecological  Conditions  of  the  Eastern 

Equatorial   Region   of  the   Northern    Pacific   Ocean. 

Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers,  Moscow,  (in  Russian) 
MacDonald.  J.  D.  &  Lawford,  P.  A.  ( 1954).  Sight  records  of 

birds  in  the  Pacific  compiled  from  the  bird  log  kept  during  the 

recent  cruises  of  the  H.  M.  S.  Challenger.  Emu  54(  1 ).  7-28. 
Marchal.  E.  ( 1 959 ).  Analyse  de  quelques  contrenus  stomacaus 

de  Neothunnus  albacora  (Lowe).  Bull.  Inst.  Afrique  Noire 

B(a).  1123-1136.  (in  French) 
Marks.  J.  S.,  Redmond.  R.  L.,  Hendricks.  P..  Clapp.  R.  B.  & 

Gill.  R.  E.  (1990).  Notes  on  longevity  and  flightlessness  in 

bristle-thighed  curlews.  Auk  107(4).  779-781. 
Mayr.  E.  ( 1 945 ).  Birds  of  the  Southwest  Pacific:  A  Field  Guide 

to  the  Birds  of  the  Area  Between  Samoa,  NewCaledonia,  and 

Micronesia.  316  pp.  Macmillan  Company.  New  York. 
McClure.  H.  E.  ( 1974).  Migration  and  Survival  of  the  Birds  of 

Asia.     US  Army  Medical  Component,  SEATO  Medical 

Project.  Bangkok.  Thailand. 
Medway,  L.  &  Wells.  D.  R.  (1976).     Birds  of  the  Malax 

Peninsula,  Vol.  V.  Witherby,  London. 
MorzerBruyns.  W.  F.J.  ( 1965).  Birds  seen  during  west  to  east 

trans-Pacific  crossing  along  Equatorial  Counter-current 

around  latitude  7°N,  in  the  autumn  of  1 960.  Sea  Swallow  17. 

57-66. 
Murphy,  R.  C.  ( 1936).  Oceanic  Birds  of  South  America.  Am. 

Mus.  Nat.  Hist..  New  York,  pp.  1-1245. 
Murphy.  R.  C.  ( 195 1 ).   The  populations  of  the  wedge-tailed 

shearwater  {Puffinus  pacificus).     Am.  Mus.  Novit.    1512. 

1-21. 
Murphy.  R.  C.  &  Snyder.  J.  P.  ( 1 952 ).  The  "Pealea"  phenomena 

and  other  notes  on  storm-petrels.  Amer.  Mus.  Novit.  1596. 

1-16. 


254 


Nelson.  J.  B.  (1975).    Breeding  biology  of  frigatebirds — a 

comparative  review.  The  Living  Bird  14,  1  13-156. 
Nelson.  J.  B.  (1978).    The  Sulidae:    Gannets  and  Boobies. 

Oxford  University  Press,  Oxford,  England.    1.  012  pp. 
Ng.  S.  C.  ( 1978).  Migratory  barn  swallows  (Hirundo  rustica) 

in  the  South  China  Sea.  Malay.  Nat.  J.  32,  67-73. 
Nicholson,  E.  M.  &  Douglas,  G.  ( 1969).    Draft  checklist  of 

Pacific  oceanic  islands.  Micronesica  5(2),  327-463. 
NID.  ( 1 945 ).  Pacific  Islands.  Vol.  IV.  Western  Pacific,  526  pp. 

Great  Britain  Naval  Intelligence  Division,  B.  R.  519C 

Geographical  Handbook  Series,  Butler  &  Tanner,  Ltd., 

London. 
Niering,  W.  A.  &  Sachet,  M.  -H.  (1961).    Observations  on 

Puluwat  and  Gaferut.  Caroline  Islands,  with  historical  and 

climatic  information  on  Gaferut  Island.  Atoll  Res.  Bull.  76, 

1-15. 
Osipov.  N.  N.  &  Charykov,  A.  K.  (1987).   Concentration  of 

heavy  metals  present  in  sea  water  by  films  of  petrolic  origin. 

In  Geographic  and  Economic  Problems  Involved  in  the 

Investigation  and  Harnessing  of  the  Southern  Seas  of  the 

USSR.  Abstracts:  the  Third  Ail-Union  Conference  on  Ocean 

Geography  and  Cartography  (Rostoc-na-Donu,  May  1987), 

Leningrad,  (in  Russian) 
Owen,  R.  P.  ( 1 97 1 ).  The  birds  of  the  Palau  Islands  including 

Helen  Reef,  and  Palau  bird  name  list,  10  pp.  Trust  Territory 

of  the  Pacific  Islands.  Office  of  the  Chief  Conservationist, 

Biology   Laboratory,   Koror,   Palau,  Caroline   Islands. 

Unpublished  report. 
Owen,  R.  P.  (1977a).    New  bird  records  for  Micronesia  and 

major  island  groups  in  Micronesia.    Micronesica  13(  1 ). 

57-63. 
Owen.  R.  P.  (1977b).  A  checklist  of  the  birds  of  Micronesia. 

Micronesica  13(  1 ),  65-81. 
Perry.  R.  (1980).    Wildlife  conservation  in  the  Line  Islands, 

Republic  of  Kiribati  (Gilbert  Islands).     Envir.  Cons.  7, 

311-318. 
Pratt.  D.  H.,  Bruner.  P.  L.  &  Berrett,  D.  G.  (1987).  The  Birds 

of  Hawaii  and  the  Tropical  Pacific.   Princeton  University 

Press.  Princeton.  New  Jersey. 
RNZAF.  (1986).   Aerial  photos  of  Maiden  Island,  SN  657 1 . 

Royal  New  Zealand  Air  Force,  Dept.  of  Survey  &  Land 

Information,  Wellington,  New  Zealand. 
Romanenko,  V.  I.  &  Kuznetsov,  S.  I.  (1974).    Ecology  of 

Freshwater  Microorganisms.     A  Laboratory  Handbook. 

Nauka  Publishers.  Leningrad.    194  pp.  (in  Russian) 
Savilov.  A.  I.  ( 1969).  Pleuston  of  the  Pacific  Ocean.  In  Tikhii- 

Pacific  Ocean.  Part  II.  Deep-water Benthic Fauna.  Pleuston, 

pp.  264-353.  Nauka  Publishers,  Moscow,  (in  Russian) 
Schreiber.  R.  W.  &  Ashmole,  N.  P.  (1970).  Seabird  breeding 

seasons  on  Christmas  Island,  Pacific  Ocean.     Ibis  112, 

363-394. 
Schreiber.  R.  W.  &  Schreiber.  E.  A.  ( 1984).   Central  Pacific 

seabirds  and  the  El  Nino  Southern  Oscillation:  1982  to  1983 

perspectives.  Science  225.  7 1 3-7 1 6. 
Sherman.  K.  (1963)  Pontellidcopepod  distribution  in  relation 

to  surface  water  types  in  the  central  North  Pacific.  Limnol. 

Oceanogr.  8(2).  214-227. 


Sibley,  F.  C.  &  Clapp,  R.  B.  ( 1 967).  Distribution  and  dispersal 

of  central  Pacific  lesser  frigatebirds  Fregata  ariel.  Ibis  109. 

328-337. 
Simpson,  D.  M.  ( 1983a).  Autumn  migration  of  land  birds  off 

North  Borneo  in  1981.  Sea  Swallow  32,  48-54. 
Simpson,  D.  M.  ( 1 983b).  Birds  seen  at  the  Tembungo  gas  flare. 

North  Borneo  during  the  development  of  Typhoon  Clara. 

Sea  Swallow  32,  82-83. 
Sorokin.   Yu.    I.   (1971a).      Assessment  of  the  role  of 

bacterioplankton  in  the  productivity  of  Pacific  Ocean  waters. 

In  The  Functioning  of  Pelagic  Communities  in  Tropical 

Ocean  Waters,  pp.  92-122.  Nauka  Publishers,  Moscow,  (in 

Russian) 
Sorokin,  Yu.  I.  ( 1 97 1  b).  Quantitative  assessment  of  the  role  of 

bacterio-plankton  in  the  biological  productivity  of  the  tropical 

Pacific.     In  The  Functioning  of  Pelagic  Communities  in 

Tropical  Ocean  Waters.   Nauka  Publishers.  Moscow,    (in 

Russian) 
Sorokin.  Yu.  I.  ( 1973).  Productivity  of  bacterioplankton  in  the 

western  Pacific.  Oceanology  13(  1 ),  95-106.  (in  Russian) 
Sorokin,  Yu.  I.  ( 1976).  Primary  production  in  seas  and  oceans. 

In  Science  and  Technology  Findings.     General  Ecology. 

Biocenology.  Hydrobiology.  Vol.  1.  VINITI.  Moscow,  (in 

Russian) 
Sorokin.  Yu.  I.  ( 1978).  Description  of  primary  production  and 

heterotrophic  microplankton  in  the  Peruvian  upwelling 

region.  Oceanology  18(1 ).  97-1 10.  (in  Russian) 
Sorokin,  Yu.   I.  (1982).     The  role  of  microheterotrophic 

organisms  in  the  functioning  of  marine  ecosystems.    Usp. 

Sovrem.  Biol.  93(2),  236-252.  (in  Russian) 
Sorokin,  Yu.  I.,  Korsak,  M.  N„  Mamaeva,  T.  I.  &  Kogel'shchitu, 

D.  D.  ( 1983).  Primary  production  and  activity  of  microflora 

in  Peruvian  upwelling  areas.  In  Bioproductivity  of  Upwelling 

Ecosystems,  pp.  74-87.  Moscow,  (in  Russian) 
SPREP.  ( 1 989).  The  Northern  Marshall  Islands  natural  diversity 

and  protected  areas  survey,  7-24  September  1988,  133  pp. 

South  Pacific  Regional  Environment  Program.  Noumea. 

New  Caledonia,  and  East-West  Center.  Honolulu,  Hawaii. 
Stepan'yants,  S.  D.  (1977).     Siphonophores  of  the  central 

Pacific  Ocean.     In  Marine  Plankton  (Systematics  and 

Faunistics),  pp.  54-81.  Leningrad,  (in  Russian) 
Stoddart,  D.  R.  (MS).  Scientific  importance  and  conservation 

of  Central  Pacific  Islands,  28  pp.    Dept.  of  Geography, 

Cambridge  University,  England.    Unpublished  typescript 

manuscript. 
Tasker.  M.  L..  Jones.  P.  H„  Dixon,  T.  &  Blake,  B.  F.  ( 1984). 

Counting  seabirds  at  sea  from  ships:  A  review  of  methods 

employed  and  a  suggestion  for  a  standardized  approach.  Auk 

101(31,567-577. 
Tsyban,  A.  V.  (ed.  )  (1980).    Handbook  of  Methods  for  the 

Biological  Analysis  of  Sea  Water  and  Benthic  Deposits 

(1980).  Gidrometeoizdat.  Leningrad.   191pp.  (in  Russian) 
Tsyban,  A.  V..  Panov,  G.  V..  Subbotin,  V.  G..  Timoshenkova, 

N.  P.  &  Chernyak,  S.  M.  (eds.).    (1988).   Methodological 

Foundations  of  Integrated  Ecological  Monitoring  of  the 

Ocean.  Gidrometeoizdat  Publishers,  Moscow.  287  pp.  (in 

Russian) 


255 


UNEP.  (1984a).  Marine  Environmental  Centres:  East  Asian 

Seas.    United  Nations  Environment  Programme,  Regional 

Seas  Directories  and  Bibliographies,  Rome,  Italy.    139  pp. 
UNEP.  (1984b).  Marine  Environmental  Centres:  South  Asian 

Seas.    United  Nations  Environment  Programme,  Regional 

Seas  Directories  and  Bibliographies.  Rome,  Italy.  31  pp. 
Vinogradov,  M.  E.  ( 1978).  Physical  and  biological  features  of 

equatorial  upwellings.     Bulletin  MOIP,  otd.  bioL  83(  1 ). 

5-15.  (in  Russian) 
Vinogradov,  M.  E.  &  Shushkina,  E.  I.  ( 1987).  Functioning  of 

the  plankton  communities  of  the  ocean's  epipelagial.  Nauka 

Publishers,  Moscow,  (in  Russian) 
Vinogradov,  M.  E.  &  Voronina,  N.  M.  ( 1963).  Distribution  of 

plankton  in  waters  of  equatorial  currents  of  the  Pacific 

Ocean.  Oceanology  21, 22.  (in  Russian) 


Voronina,  N.  M.  ( 1964).  Distribution  of  surface  zooplankton 
in  equatorial-  current  waters  of  the  Pacific  Ocean  (focusing 
on  copepods  of  the  Pontellidae  family).  Trudy  Institute  of 
Oceanology  AN  SSSR  65,  95-106.  (in  Russian) 

Wells,  D.  R.  (in  prep.  ).  Malayan  bird  report:  1982  and  1983. 
Malay.  Nat.  J.  43. 

Wetmore,  A.  (1926).  The  Migrations  of  Birds.  Harvard 
University  Press,  Cambridge,  Massachusetts. 

Worcester,  D.  C.  (191 1).  Hybridism  among  boobies.  Philipp. 
J.Sci.  Sect.  D6,  179-182. 

Zaitsev,  Yu.  P.  ( 1971 ).  Marine  Neustonology.  Published  for 
NMFS.  NOAA,  US  Department  of  Commerce  and  National 
Science  Foundation,  Washington,  D.C.  207  pp.  (Translated 
from  the  Russian) 


256 


General  Conclusions 


The  BERPAC  expedition  of  1988  instituted  a  series  of 
research  projects  that  greatly  amplified  the  scope  of  the  original 
program's  overall  research  objectives.  The  cruise  included  an 
8-day  stay  on  Caroline  Atoll,  an  uninhabited  necklace  of  islets 
enclosing  a  pristine  lagoon.  Chapter  1  deals  at  length  with  the 
history,  geology,  reef  structure,  botany,  and  ornithology  of  this 
little-studied  ecosystem.  Notable  features  of  the  atoll  included 
a  nearly-continuous  reef  surmounted  by  39  islets  in  various 
stages  of  plant  succession,  many  of  them  covered  in  virgin 
forest  (Subchapter  1.1);  a  community  of  1 1  species  of  breeding 
seabirds.  numbering  in  excess  of  1,000,000  individuals 
(Subchapter  1.2);  and  a  remarkable  Acropora  -Tridacna  reef 
containing  the  world's  densest  known  colony  of  Tridacna 
clams  (Subchapter  1 .4).  The  inner  reef  system  has  developed 
within  a  lagoon  that  is  perched  several  inches  above  sea  level 
at  low  tide.  New  species  of  plants,  lizards,  land  birds 
(Subchapter  1.3),  and  seabirds  were  discovered  for  the  atoll 
during  the  1988  expedition. 

Caroline  also  provided  an  opportunity  to  compare  basic 
oceanographic  parameters  between  the  open  ocean,  an  enclosed 
lagoon,  and  the  confined  waters  of  the  South  China  Sea. 

In  Chapter  2,  one  of  the  more  recent  aspects  of  marine 
pollution — plastic  contaminants — was  examined  in  the  central 
Pacific  Ocean  and  South  China  Sea.  Surface  and  subsurface 
water  was  sampled  and  the  quantity  and  distribution  of  plastic 
debris  determined.  Plastics  collected  from  the  water  were 
extracted  and  analyzed  for  organic  pollutants  to  assess  the 
potential  hazard  of  the  transfer  of  pollutants  to  marine  organisms 
that  ingest  plastics.  Results  of  sampling  revealed  that  plastic 
debris,  and  specifically  raw  polyethylene  pellets  used  in 
manufacturing,  is  widespread  in  the  Pacific  Ocean  and  South 
China  Sea.  Plastics  occurred  more  frequently  than  did  tar  balls. 


even  in  the  South  China  Sea.  Organic  contaminants  were  not 
associated  with  plastics  at  any  detectable  levels.  However, 
subsequent  studies  demonstrated  that  plastics  can  adsorb  certain 
contaminants  and  that  this  could  represent  a  potential  hazard  to 
marine  life. 

In  Chapter  3,  primary  productivity  was  compared  between 
waters  close  to  and  distant  from  Caroline  Atoll.  Waters  close 
to  Caroline  showed  less  productivity  than  waters  nearer  to 
the  equator  (Subchapters  3.1  and  3.2).  Not  surprisingly, 
mesozooplankton  (Subchapter  3.3)  and  neuston 
(Subchapter  3.4)  diversity  and  biotnass  also  increased  toward 
the  equator,  relative  to  the  waters  near  Caroline,  due  in  part 
to  the  hydrodynamics  of  the  water  columns  near  the  equator. 
The  equatorial  parts  of  the  Pacific  were  also  much  richer  in 
seabird  diversity  and  density  than  waters  at  higher  latitudes 
(Subchapter  3.5).  One  surprise  of  the  expedition  was 
the  discovery  of  a  major  land  bird  migration  corridor  over 
the  South  China  Sea  from  Vietnam  to  Borneo 
(Subchapter  3.6). 

The  second  leg  of  the  1988  BERPAC  expedition  was  the 
first  of  a  planned  series  of  similar  cruises  in  the  tropical  Pacific 
and,  as  such,  should  be  viewed  as  a  forerunner  of  expeditions 
to  come.  Many  disciplines  relevant  to  the  unique  biology  of  the 
central  Pacific  were  not  represented  in  1988,  particularly  those 
concerned  with  the  functioning  of  coral  reef  ecosystems.  Steps 
have  been  taken  to  issue  a  broader  call  to  marine  biologists  to 
participate  in  future  expeditions  in  order  to  further  our 
understanding  of  the  World  Ocean  and  the  marine-derived 
shallow  waters  and  terrestrial  ecosystems  of  which  it  is 
composed.  If  the  publication  of  this  volume  inspires  other 
biologists  to  follow,  it  has  fulfilled  part  of  its  goal  in  presenting 
the  varied  findings  of  a  successful  initial  expedition. 


257 


Appendix  A 


Participants  of  the  First  Joint  US-USSR 
Pacific  Expedition,  Fall  1988. 


Tsyban.  A.  V.  USSR  Chief  Scientist 

Volodkovich,  Y.  L.  USSR  Assistant  Chief  Scientist 

Smith.  G.  J.  US  Chief  Scientist 

Rostovtsev,  O.  A.  Captain  of  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev 

Nelepov,  Y.  N.  Assistant  to  the  Captain  on  Scientific  Affairs 

Vaytekaya,  Y.  I.  Scientific  Secretary 

Petrovskaya,  S.  V.  Interpreter 

USSR  Participants: 

Alexandrov,  Boris  G.  (Microbiologist — Neuston) 
Junior  Scientist, 
Institute  of  Biology  of  the  South  Seas  & 

Academy  of  Sciences  of  Ukranian  SSR.  Odessa  Branch 
37  Pushkinskaya  Street,  27001 1  Odessa,  UkSSR 

Barinova,  Svetlana  (Microbiologist — Microorganism  indicators) 
Leading  Engineer, 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 

Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 

Belyaeva,  Olga  L.  (Hydrobiologist — Polyaromatic  hydrocarbons) 
Junior  Scientist, 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 
Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 

Chernyak,  Sergei  M.  (Chemist — Chlorinated  hydrocarbons) 
Senior  Scientist, 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 

Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow.  USSR 

Drakov,  Sergei  N.  (Hydrobiologist — Vertical  profiles) 
Leading  Designer, 
Institute  of  Physics  & 
Academy  of  Sciences,  Beleorousskoi  SSR 
Leninsky  Prospekt.  70 
Minsk,  BSSR  220602 


259 


Irha,  Natalya  I.  (Organic  Chemist — Photochemical  oxidation  of  PAH's) 
Scientist, 

Institute  of  Chemistry  & 
Academy  of  Sciences,  Estonia  SSR 
Akademia  Teye  Street,  1 5 
Tallin.  ESSR  200108 

Kolobova,  Tatiana  P.  (Analytical  Chemist — Trace  metals) 
Senior  Scientist, 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 

Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 

Koltun,  Vladimir  M.  (Hydrobiologist — Benthos) 
Department  Head  and  Leading  Scientist, 
Zoological  Institute  & 

USSR  Academy  of  Sciences 
Universitetskaya  Street,  I 
Leningrad,  USSR  199034 

Korsak,  Mikhail  N.  (Hydrobiologist — Primary  production) 
Senior  Scientist, 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 

Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 

Korzhikov,  Igor  A.  (Hydrobiologist — Primary  production) 
Junior  Scientist, 

Far  Eastern  Regional  Research  Institute  of 
Goskomgidromet  USSR 
24  Dzerjinskiy  Stret,  690600 
Vladivostok,  USSR 

Kudryatsev,  Vassiliy  (Microbiologist — Bacterial  production) 
Senior  Scientist, 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 

Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 

Kulikov,  Audrey  S.  (Hydrobiologist — Mesozooplankton) 
Junior  Scientist. 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 

Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 

Kumeisha,  Alexander  A.  (Hydrooptician — Hydrooptics) 
Senior  Scientist. 
Institute  of  Physics  & 

Academy  of  Sciences,  Beleorousskoi  SSR 
Leninsky  Prospekt.  70 
Minsk,  BSSR  220602 

260 


Levina,  Olga  N.  (Hydrobiologist — Microzooplankton) 

Engineer, 

Southern  Division  of  the  Oceanographic  Institute  & 

Academy  of  Sciences 
Gelendzhik  7,353470 
Oceanologiya,  USSR 

Lukin,  Alexander  E.  (Hydrooptician — Hydrooptics) 
Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 
Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 

Mamaev.  Vladimir  O.  (Microbiologist — Numbers  and  biomass  of  microorganisms) 
Post  Graduate  Student, 
Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 

Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 

Mamaeva,  Nila  V.  (Protozoologist — Microzooplankton) 
Senior  Scientist, 
Southern  Division  of  the  Oceanographic  Institute  of  the  USSR  & 

Academy  of  Sciences 
Gelendzhik  7.  353470 
Oceanologiya,  USSR 

Marchenko,  Alexanders.  (Hydrobiologist — Technician) 
Senior  Engineer, 

Institute  of  Biology  of  the  South  Seas  & 
Academy  of  Sciences  of  Ukranian  SSR.  Odessa  Branch 
37  Pushkinskaya  Street.  27001  I 
Odessa,  UkSSR 

Medinets,  Vladimir  I.  (Hydrobiologist — Biosedimentation) 
Engineer, 

Odessa  Department  of  the  State  Oceanographic  Institute 
Goskomgidromet,  USSR 
Proletarski  Boulevard,  89 
Odessa,  USSR  15,  270015 

Nelepov,  Yeugeniy  N.  (Assistant  to  the  Captain  on  scientific  affairs) 
Far  Eastern  Regional  Research  Institute  of 
Goskomgidromet  of  USSR 
24  Dzerjinskiy  Street.  690600 
Vladivostok.  USSR 

Panov,  Gennadiy  V.  (Microbiologist — Bacterial  degradation  of  pollutants) 
Senior  Scientist, 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 

Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 


261 


Pershina,  Irina  V.  (Analytical  Chemist — Dissolved  organic  matter) 
Junior  Scientist. 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 

Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 

Petrovskaya.  Svetlana  (Expedition  Interpreter) 
Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 

Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street.  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 

Polishchuk,  Leonid  N.  (Hydrobiologist — Biogeography  of  zooneuston) 
Senior  Scientist, 
Institute  of  Biology  of  South  Seas  & 

Academy  of  Sciences  of  Ukranian  SSR.  Odessa  Branch 
37  Pushkinskaya  Street.  27001 1 
Odessa,  UkSSR 

Rostovtsev,  Oleg  A.  (Captain  of  the  R/V  Akademik  Korolev) 
Far  Eastern  Regional  Research  Institute  of 
Goskomgidromet  of  USSR 
24  Dzerjinskiy  Street,  690600 
Vladivostok.  USSR 

Shigaev.  Viktor  V.  (Oceanographer — Conductivity/temperature/depth) 
Senior  Scientist, 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 

Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 

Sirenko,  Boris  I.  (Hydrobiologist — Macros-benthos) 
Senior  Scientist. 
Zoological  Institute  & 

USSR  Academy  of  Sciences 
Universitetskaya  Street.  I 
Leningrad,  USSR  199034 

Tsyban,  Alia  V.  (USSR  Chief  Scientist) 

Professor  of  Ecology  and  Deputy  Director. 
Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology. 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 
Academy  of  Sciences 
12.  Morozo\  Street.  123376 
Moscow,  USSR 

I  Irbas,  Eha  R.  (Organic  Chemist — Photochemical  oxidation  of  PAH's) 
Scientist. 

Institute  of  Chemistry  & 
Academy  of  Sciences.  Estonia  SSR 
Akademia  Teye  Street.  15 
l.illin.  ESSR  200I0S 


262 


Vaytekaya,  Yanina  I.  (Hydrochemist — Scientific  Secretary) 
Hydrometeorological  Observatory  of  Klaipeda 
Board  of  Hydrometeorology  of  Lithuania 
Goskomgidromet  of  USSR 
Taikos  Street.  26,  235800 
Klaipeda,  USSR 

Ventsel,  Mikhail  V.  (Hydrobiologist — Phytoplankton) 
Junior  Scientist, 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 
Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 

Volodkovich,  Yuriy  L.  (Hydrobiologist — USSR  Assistant  Chief  Scientist) 
Senior  Scientist, 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 

Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 

Vronskaya,  Valeriya  M.  (Hydrobiologist — Photochemical  oxidation  of  PAH's) 
Junior  Scientist, 

Institute  of  Global  Climate  and  Ecology, 
USSR  State  Committee  for  Hydrometeorology  & 
Academy  of  Sciences 
Glebovskaya  Street,  107258 
Moscow,  USSR 

US  Participants: 

Ellis,  David  H.  (Research  Biologist,  Ph.D. — Atoll  ecology  and  oceanic  seabird  surveys) 
US  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 
Patuxent  Wildlife  Research  Center 
Laurel,  Maryland  20708 

Kepler,  Angela  K.  (Biologist,  Ph.D. — Atoll  ecology  and  oceanic  seabird  surveys) 
400  Snapfinger  Drive 
Athens,  Georgia  30605 

Kepler,  Cameron  K.  (Research  Biologist,  Ph.D. — Atoll  ecology  and  oceanic  seabird  surveys) 
US  Fish  and  Wildlife  Service 
Patuxent  Wildlife  Research  Center 
Southeast  Research  Group 
University  of  Georgia 
Athens,  Georgia  30602 

Sibley.  Thomas  H.  (Aquatic  Toxicologist,  Ph.D. — Bioaccumulation  of  contaminants) 
Fisheries  Research  Institute.  WH-10 
University  of  Washington 
Seattle,  Washington  98195 


263 


Smith,  Gregory  J.  (Biologist,  Ph.D. — Methods  of  collection  of  plastics) 
Wildlife  International,  Ltd. 
305  Commerce  Drive 
Euston,  Maryland  21601 

Stafford.  Charles  J.  (Analytical  Chemist — Methods  of  analysis) 
US  Environmental  Protection  Agency 
Analytical  Chemistry  Laboratory 
Beltsville,  Maryland  20705 


264