(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Open Source Books | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

Anonymous User (login or join us)Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Robert Blatchford : the sketch of a personality: an estimate of some achievements"

0) 
CD 
CM 
10 



is 

CO 
CO 





i'vs Richards 




^Blatchford 



The Sketch of a 'Personality : An 
Estimate of Some ^Achievements . 

By <A. 



H 



.- THE 
44, Worship Street, S.C. 






Contents. 

Chapter Page 

Preamble i 

I. Childhood .... 7 

II. Boyhood . . . .15 

III. The Great Adventure . . 25 

IV. The Army . . . .37 
V. More Army . . . 45 

VI. Waiting . . . . -55 

VII. Journalism and Journalists . 65 

VIII. "The Bounder" ... 77 

IX. Success and Socialism . . 85 

X. The "Clarion" ... 93 

XI. Practice and Fellowship . 107 

XII. As Novelist . . . .115 

XIII. "A Son of the Forge". . 125 

XIV. Chapter and Verse . . . 139 
XV. More Quotes . . . . 151 

XVI. The " Thunder Books " . .163 

XVII. Personalities . . .179 



List of Illustrations. 

" R.B." Aged Six . . opposite page 8 

"R.B.V MOTHER . . 16 

" R.B." Aged Twenty-two . 26 

AS A "ROOKY" ... . 38 

AN ARMY AWARD '. 50 

SERGEANT ROBERT BLATCHFORD 56 

EARLY JOURNALISTIC DAYS 66 

E. F. FAY ("THE BOUNDER") 78 

" R.B." AT PRESENT TIME . 164 



Robert T^latchford : 

The Sketch of a Personality 

Authoritative Preamble. 

*Jl/fEMBERS of the " Clarion" Staff always 
VrA think and speak of him as" R.B" The 
readers of the paper and persons who capture 
him at railway stations usually call him "Bob." 
1 suppose that some psychological significance at- 
taches t'o this fact ; but I shall content my self with 
placing the fact on record^ leaving to my readers 
themselves the task of supplying philosophic com- 
ment. I owe it, however, to my colleagues to an- 
ticipate and repudiate the obvious suggestion that 
we are awed by the Presence. It is not like that. 
We know " R.B." himself- the man behind the 
man who writes the books and I suppose that^ 
li^e our readers^ we are snobs y and feel that a 
familiarity practised by the multitude is too gross 
for us. 

This is a genial sort of beginning / dont 
B 



Robert 'Blatchford 



thinly But the fact is that the writer of these 
lines is feeling rather sic^. He has to do a "^ery 
difficult thing : to 'write honestly about an intimate 
friend. 

Ton will have guessed instinctively that I 
undertake this task with many misgivings. Of 
course. I should not, in any case, have omitted 
to place on record such a gentlemanly sentiment. 
But I have reasons enough for misgiving e*ben 
for abject funk. It is not merely that I am al- 
most the youngest of Mr. Blatchford's colleagues 
and the newest of his friends, but that I am also 
faced by this discomforting thought more than 
half the people who will read this production 
haVe tyiown Mr. Blatchford and worshipped him, 
either in a vicarious or a personal sense, for 
nearly as many years as I have lft>ed. T'hese 
people will naturally view, if not with hostile 
feelings, at least with Very critical ones, this 
effort, as it were, of a newly joined midshipman 
to explain his captain to old messmates. But 
a monograph concerning Mr. TZlatchford had 
obviously to be written, pending the full-dress 
biography which some hand will some day cer- 
tainly write. W^e had much argument about it, 
and we ultimately decided that the only "Clarion" 



Authoritative Preamble 



writer possessing the impudence essential to the 
performance of this feat was myself. That 
is my simple explanation. 

It is clear, of course, that the man best qualified 
to write about " R. S." was " R. S.V oldest 
colleague and convive Mr. A. M. 'Thompson. 
'But ^Mr. Thompson asserted that his great 
friendship for ^Mr. IHatchford was in itself a 
bar to the undertaking. "/ could as easily ', " he 
saidy "write an honest book about my wife." 
It suits m>e ^ery well to seize upon this argument. 
The converse of ^Mr. Thompsons plea shall be 
my plea : I know Mr. Blatcbford so compara- 
tively little that I may, perhaps, succeed in writing 
honestly about him. 

But it is an ill business ah the same. ^My 
mind is surging with confused ideas about the 
apologies which I ought to offer, the explanations 
which I ought to make. 

There is, for instance, the question of my own 
attitude towards ^Mr. Blatcbford. I feel bound 
to make a plain statement in this connection, so 
that those readers who, on the one hand, are look- 
ing for gush, and those, on the other hand, who 
expect impertinences^ may be induced to refrain 
from reading these pages, supposing such an 



Robert 'Blatchford 



action to be possible. It was stated, in a hastily- 
written announcement respecting this sketch^ that 
I "view the opinions and temperament of \A4r. 
Blatchford very critically." This is at once an 
over-statement and an under-statement of my 
position. 'To say that I view certain of ^Mr. 
'Blatchford 's opinions ^ery critically is grossly to 
understate the passionate scorn with 'Vshich I view 
bis complacent belief in human goodness and his 
demotion to certain puritan ideals. 'To state that I 
view " Ipery critically " his opinion of my favourite 
authors is to be guilty of childish satire at the ex- 
pense of the blind fury which possesses me in respect 
of what I call " c R. B.'s' intolerance" But how 
could one "view critically" ^Mr. Blatchfora"s 
temperament ? It is a benign, understanding, 
steadfast temperament. A dancing temperament. 
A wise, a hopeful, heartening temperament. It 
is a temperament which draws out music from it- 
self like a harp which is touched by breath. It 
is a temperament which loves lame dogs. It is a 
temperament which gave me help and encourage- 
ment when I sorely needed them. It is the tem- 
perament of my friend. It is my friend. 

Tou will see that so far as Mr. Blatchford' s 
personality is concerned I approach him in a spirit 



Authoritative Preamble 



of strong and reverent partisanship. <^fnd I am 
glad to say that the work which lies before me 
will be chiefly concerned with his personality. 
When I have finished with the story of"R. 5.V 
life, I shall have something not much to say about 
his work, and, consequently, about his opinions ; 
and I shall say some things which I have often 
said to him before, and shall often say again, on 
many a jolly ramble and in many a pleasant inn. 
But all that will be mere trimming. I feel con- 
vinced that that which you chiefly want to hear is 
the story of fMr. Blatchford's life : the fairy story 
of an ill-taught, ill-fed child, a colour-printer s 
deYil, who grew up to be a man a Great Man. 
I say that Robert Blatchford is a great man. It 
is a great thing to have taken in hand a forlorn, 
discredited cause like the Socialism which was, 
and to make of it, in fifteen years, a living, vital, 
pregnant thing like the Socialism which is. No 
honest man will deny that Blatchford' s pen alone 
has produced has invented if you like "the 
rank and file " of Socialism. I say that it is a 
big thing to ha^e done this. It is also a big thing 
and here I speak with the heartfelt veneration 
of a craftsman to write the cleanest, straightest 
English which has been written in our time. 



Robert Watchford 



In writing this sketch, therefore, I shall be 
erned by the following preconceptions : 

(1) That fMr. Elatchford is a very close and 

intimate friend. 

(2) That I regard him as a great man a 

genius. 

(3) That I disagree with quite half of his 

opinions. 

Within the limitations imposed upon me by 
these premises, I hope to produce an honest book. 



a. L Childhood 



THERE used to live in Halifax a little 
old lady who was great friends with 
the milkman's horse. One day, when 
this old lady was examining a shop-window in 
a crowded thoroughfare, the milkman's horse 
(a tall, white animal) recognised her back, and 
ascending the pavement, accompanied by his 
cart and milk-cans, placed a familiar nose upon 
her shoulder. The little old lady, turning 
round, remarked, merely, " Hullo, here's 
Pete," and at once entered into a long and 
affectionate conversation with the milkman's 
horse, much to the interest of passers-by. 

This story is told by the old lady's own 
son's wife, who witnessed the incident. That 
son is the subject of this sketch; and so, 
perhaps, the story will not be considered 
irrelevant. 

And, indeed, this story and all stories con- 
cerning Louisa Blatchford have a special 
relevance in this place, for it is impossible to 
consider the complex character of Robert 
Blatchford without reference to the tempera- 
ment and influence of his mother. 

Louisa Blatchford was, for all psychological 



8 Robert Watch ford 

purposes, Robert's only parent. Mr. Blatch- 
ford himself knows little of his father. He 
was a strolling actor and an ardent Tory, who 
christened his second and last-born son Robert 
Peel Glanville, doubtless believing that names 
like these would form an attractive substitute 
for a patrimony. There is a story current in 
the B latch ford family concerning little 
Robert's christening (John Blatchford was a 
great Churchman). When the baptismal party 
had arrived at the font and the officiating 
clergyman had learnt that the infant in his 
arms was to be christened Robert Peel, he said, 
to the father: "After the great statesman?" 
and on receiving an affirmative reply, he 
expressed the hope that little Robert would 
grow up to be as clever a man. "Ah," said 
John Blatchford, " I hope he will be half as 
clever." It is to be hoped that the shade of 
John Blatchford, supposing that the long-spent 
spirit concerns itself with earthly or democratic 
matters, is satisfied with the answer which has 
been vouchsafed to his pious wish. 

John Blatchford was not able to witness the 
fulfilment of his hope; for he died in 1853, 
when Robert was two years old. Thence- 
forward, Louisa Blatchford became the sole 
guardian of her two sons (Montagu, the elder, 
was born in 1848, three years before Robert), 
and how, a frightened, friendless, lonely 
woman, faced with the most terrible poverty, 




Six. 



Childhood 



she bravely discharged this guardianship will 
presently be seen. 

Mr. Blatchford says that his mother was a 
"queer customer," and difficult to describe. 
But, yielding to the importunities of the pre- 
sent writer, he has written a little sketch of his 
mother, as she appeared to him. This charming 
document will appear in due place. 

It is quite evident that Mr. Blatchford has 
to thank his mother, not merely for his 
preliminary appearance upon the stage of life, 
her care and love, but for his own originality 
of thought and feeling. If he derives from 
his father any characteristics at all, it is 
probably that streak of simplicity, of naivete, 
in faith and outlook (such, for instance, as his 
simple, intense, straightforward patriotism) 
which is at once a puzzle and a charm to those 
who know him. If it is the paternal fount 
from which " R. B." derives his unaffected 
belief in simple human goodness, it may cer- 
tainly be said that the paternal legacy was, 
after all, no mean one. 

Most clever men nearly all clever men are 
by nature cynical. " R. B.'s " utter absence of 
cynicism, of the cynic's doubt and bitterness, 
while apt to be a trying quality in argument, is 
obviously in itself a thing to be envied. 
" R. B." has a hopeful, benignant attitude 
towards life, an attitude of calm affection 
which is different in itself, as it is different in 






io Robert 'Blatchford 

its source, from the contemptuous calm of the 
cynic. The cynic may marvel at this attitude, 
but he cannot help but envy it. If he happen 
to subject the matter to speculation and if 
he had swopped tobacco and secrets with 
"R. B.," he will probably conclude that John 
B latch ford is at the bottom of the matter. 

It will presently be necessary to put forward 
the proposition that " R. B." is, in essential 
matters of the spirit, an ardent and irrevocable 
Tory that which is called " a Tory of the old 
school." But this proposition, together with 
the considerations upon which it is based, will 
be presented in subsequent and more critical 
chapters. It is mentioned here in order that the 
reader may be asked not to confuse this in- 
tellectual, emotional, perfectly sane Toryism 
of Robert with the flat-footed, latter-day, 
obvious Toryism of his father. In so far as 
the father's blood has given any political 
colour to that of the son, it is in matters of 
mere family prejudice and sentiment. " R. B.'s" 
mother's father had served as a middy 
under Nelson, and had been wounded at the 
Battle of the Nile. When, during the Boer 
War, his grandson scandalised Small Heath 
or was it Bootle ? by instructing his daughter 
to play " God Save the Queen " once a day to 
the glory of British , arms, he was doubtless 
actuated by the direct and obvious influence of 
heredity. 



Childhood n 



And then, again, his Christian name was 
Peel. And then, again, he had served for 
seven years as an English soldier. And then, 
again, he had the fortune to be born in 
England, and Englishmen were being killed 
for an idea or for money. He believed the 
idea to be mistaken and the money to be dearly 
earned, but not being cynical like his critics, he 
overlooked the absurdity of Tommy Atkins' 
performance and fastened his mind upon the 
fact that Tommy Atkins was being made all 
dead and bloody by bullets. So he commanded 
his daughter to play "God Save the Queen," 
and a congress of six north-country intellec- 
tuals sternly turned his picture to the wall. 
His recovery was slow but sure. 

Let us now pursue our narrative. 

Before Robert Blatchford was ten years old, 
he had travelled in Scotland; in the North of 
England; in the Eastern Counties, and in the 
Isle of Wight. Portsmouth, Leicester, and Lon- 
don were among the cities which he had visited. 

Mr. Blatchford tells some perfectly horrible 
tales about that time. His mother was an 
actress, and at the age of 32 she was left with 
two little boys and no money. She had never 
acted in any but the poorest theatres or earned 
but the poorest wage ; and it was not to be sup- 
posed that the widow, alone and friendless, 
could make a better trade of it than husband 
and wife together had done. For years she 



12 Robert 'Blatchford 

struggled on, working sometimes with small 
touring companies, more often travelling alone 
with the two children (often on foot) seeking 
an engagement in one small town after another, 
and not always finding it. The little family 
tasted of poverty in all its forms; mother and 
children alike were always cold, and often 
hungry, but sometimes they were literally 
starving. " R. B." says that his strongest and 
most poignant recollection of that period is 
of the agonies of cold which they endured. 
Nothing, he says, is so precious to poor people 
or so hardly to be won as warmth. As a little 
boy he learned to hate and dread the winter 
months ; and cold weather makes him depressed 
and broody even now. When he was a very 
young child he used to get up early and grub 
in other people's dustbins for old bottles, which 
he would barter for coals. 

It was an awful time, and does not call for 
emphasis. 

In 1862, when Robert was eleven years old, 
the family went to Halifax. They tramped 
there from Bradford. Louisa Blatchford 
possessed relations, of a distant kind, in the 
former town, and they had promised to help 
her in finding work of a less ebullient and 
spasmodic nature than that afforded by the 
stage. The joint efforts were successful, and 
Mrs. Blatchford, with needles, and thread, and 
a dressmaker's measure, took up life anew, 



Childhood 13 



discharging the stage for ever with a thankful 
heart. Mr. Blatchford says that his mother 
hated the stage. As a matter of fact, this 
hatred had its basis in a very practical dread. 
The stage life had won her nothing but hard- 
ship ; and the people with whom it brought her 
into contact were probably small-minded, and 
unhappy, and selish, and unkind. Her whole 
life, in its relation to her sons, expresses the 
fear which she felt lest either of the boys 
should ever be thrown back again into that 
dreadful life of penury and vagabondage. 

After they all had settled down in Halifax, 
both the boys went out to work. Robert, child 
as he was, took employment as an errand boy 
(i.e., beer f etcher) in a colour printing works 
He worked in this capacity for twelve hours 
every day, and received a weekly wage of 
eighteen-pence. 



Chap. II. Boyhood 



TTJ 1TJ " WAS a very delicate child. The 
Jj^Y, Jj . doctors many and various 
doctors, met with in divers 
places during the pilgrimage of want 
said that he would never live to be seven; 
then that he would die before he was ten, then 
before twelve, then before fourteen. They 
meant well, but, as " R. B." says, the luck 
was against them. The doctors, all the same, 
were justified of their wisdom to the extent that 
Robert remained a very sickly boy. He was 
still a sickly boy sicklier than ever when 
he joined the Army, but there, he says, they 
made a man of him in six months. 

Well, at the useful age of eleven this frail 
child, as has already been recorded, was toiling 
and sweating and bleeding at a colour 
printer's. In what may perhaps be termed his 
leisure hours he was given all which the weary, 
eager, persistent mother had to give him in the 
way of knowledge. He had actually learned 
to read when he was eight years old. When 
the juvenile tasks which he was put to do each 
day at the colour printer's had been quite com- 
pleted; when he had reached home and had 
run upon the ordinary errands for his mother; 



16 Robert 'Blatchford 

when he had had his lessons in Scripture and 
arithmetic, and his lecture upon filial deport- 
ment, and had washed up the tea-things and 
helped with the supper (presuming that it ran 
to supper), he was at leisure to follow literary 
pursuits. These at this time consisted in read- 
ing "The Pilgrim's Progress " reading it and 
re-reading it, and then reading it over again. 
He also read, when he could get hold of them, 
stories about battles and about Nelson and 
Wellington. But all his juvenile reading put 
together did not amount to much not, at least, 
in respect of variety. 

This is not to be wondered at when you 
consider how his life was crowded with what 
we will describe as "other interests." It is 
difficult to be a good son and a hard-working 
lad and a schoolboy and a voracious reader all 
at once, at eleven years of age and on eighteen- 
pence a week. Young Robert differed from 
any other grimy little toiler of his age and 
status not in respect of the number and class 
of books which he read, but in the fact that he 
was minded to read at all. His opportunities, 
whatever they were, did not carry him far in 
these days : for he has placed it on record that 
at sixteen he was just able to read and write. 

I do not want you to get hold of the idea 
that the boy was neglected or " put upon ' ' at 
home. It was not the poor mother's fault that 
her son went out to work before he had reached 



'Boyhood 17 



even the age at which other boys begin to 
learn to play : it was not her fault that he had 
few books to read and few spare minutes in 
which to read them, or that she could tell him 
so little concerning the things and ideas which 
are written about in books. His mother was 
a plucky, irritable, intelligent, penniless, half- 
Italian woman faced with an awful problem. 
She worked hard all day long, and during 
the nights as well, but all the money which her 
ten sore fingers could secure would not keep 
a woman and two boys in food and lodging. 

Louisa Blatchford's actual weekly wage was 
eight shillings. To this sum Montagu, who 
worked as an errand boy, contributed two 
shillings, and Robert, as we have seen, added 
another eighteenpence. Thus the family 
possessed a combined weekly income of eleven 
shillings and sixpence, out of which stipend 
five shillings had to be deducted by way of 
rent for two furnished rooms. A sum of six 
shillings and sixpence thus remained in hand, 
with which to cover the week's expenditure in 
respect of food, light, warmth, clothing, recrea- 
tion, and culture for three people. Are we to 
blame the little dressmaker for sending her 
children out to work ? 

Robert was not her favourite child. He 
was looked upon as being rather "slow"; as 
being unworthy of the family reputation for 
mental alertness. But he was her very son, and 

C 



i8 Robert Elatchford 

she fought and struggled for him and argued 
with him and corrected him and watched him 
and tried to instil things into him religion, 
politics, and a fierce loathing for plays and 
players above all that. Surely my readers 
can understand and like this woman? A 
woman with fifty little talents, fifty little 
graces, fifty little "corners/ 1 fifty little pre- 
judices, and with stupendous courage, resource, 
and vitality. But one need not labour to 
explain her, for here is " R. B.'s " own picture 
of his mother : 

" She was a little woman, with square 
shoulders : slim, and light on her feet. You 
may see the picture of her, face and figure, at 
any Italian fruit stall, as you may see mine 
behind many an Italian organ. She had 
abundant black hair, hazel eyes, black eye- 
brows, like smears; large, white, even teeth, a 
heavy mouth and jaw. She had a good mezzo 
voice, and as a young woman sang well. In 
temperament she was very, very mixed and 
elusive in fact, Italian. She had high spirits 
(when not in the dumps) ; was witty and bright, 
and had a ringing, voluminous laugh that hung 
on the hair trigger. She was not a good- 
tempered woman. Her temper was most uncer- 
tain. She would be angelic for weeks, and 
then the nether fires would burn up, and she 
was impossible for a day or so. She was 
'odd, 1 too had an odd, abrupt, and 



'Boyhood 19 



whimsical way distinctly suggestive of Betsy 
Trotwood. Her religion and politics seem to 
me at this day to have been weird. But I think 
she got them from my father, who was a 
Churchman and an admirer of Sir Robert 
Peel. 

" Well, my mother was not quite an educated 
woman. But she was the daughter of a com- 
poser, and she had been brought up in 
Bohemian circles and on the stage; and she 
talked well, and her English was correct; and 
she read a good deal (mostly fiction). 

" She was not a Bohemian at all, but very 
respectable and strict, and she did not like the 
stage. Her aversion to the idea of her sons 
being actors was very strong, and she made 
great sacrifices and worked very hard to keep 
us out of the Bohemian environment. 

" She taught us her religion and her ideas 
of politics, and used to read and sing to us, 
and tell us stories. She hated humbug and 
snobbery, and she was rather satirical and not 
at all romantic. She was compassionate and 
generous, and loved children and animals. 
She was almost like a witch with animals. Her 
cats followed her to church : her chickens slept 
on the hearthrug, and the milkman's horse 
would stop her in the street and ask for cakes. 

" She was brave and obstinate and per- 
severing and practical, and she wore the oddest 
bonnets. 



20 Robert Elatchford 

" Now can you see her ? She could be 
delightful ; but she was hard to live with, and 
she had a most ruthless and wounding tongue. 

" I think she was a clever woman, but was 
wasted never had a chance. She had an 
original gift for drawing, and had a fertile 
mind and a fluent flow of language. Just an 
impulsive, unreasonable, clever, wilful, bad- 
tempered, affectionate, pleasing, exasperating, 
funny little Italian woman. But it would take 
a book and a Thackeray to paint her portrait." 

This is not merely splendid writing : it is 
splendid biography. It presents the whole 
drama of " R. B.'s " childhood; it explains 
what one means by saying that, psychologi- 
cally, " R. B." was born an orphan. 

At fourteen years of age our now mature 
young labourer was taken from the colour- 
printing works and apprenticed to brush- 
making. Louisa Blatchford had a very sound 
belief in the value to her sons of "a trade." 
She could not give them any money orTnuch 
education, but she would give them a "trade." 
This, she argued, was the surest obtainable 
charm against hardships, and against that 
which she held to be the basis of all want and 
unhappiness the damnable spell of the foot- 
lights. 

" R. B." worked at brush-making for twelve 
hours every day : from six in the morning until 
six at night. He says that it was hard, dirty 



'Boyhood 21 



work in a dusty, smoky shop, conducted by 
ordinarily objectionable bosses. "But/' he 
also says, " many of the men and boys and 
girls were very good and intelligent." 

That is a queer statement. A man is bound 
to wonder what those men and boys and girls 
did with their intelligence while they went out 
making brushes from six to six. 

"What did ' R. B.' do with his? " you ask. 
Dear brethren, " R. B." took it with him to the 
brush works and" R. B." " did a guy." 

But we have not yet arrived at that point. 
You must first of all be told that about this 
time " R. B." began to visit chapel. This was 
a very natural proceeding; for " R. B." was 
obviously and necessarily a lad with stuff in 
him, and the chapel would offer the society of 
other young men having stuff in them : young 
men with minds in embryo, with vague internal 
cravings for fare other than pork : young men 
with a vague perception of the Problem. 
" R. B." kept up his chapel-going until he was 
twenty, at which age Fate intervened; and he 
says that the chapel did him lots of good, and 
taught him to think to criticise. The chapel 
planted a seed, and the seed has grown into 
a tree a tree which is rather by way of being a 
nuisance to the chapel. " R. B." does not 
think that at any time of his life he possessed 
what is called the religious instinct; he was 
attracted to the chapel because it was a resort 



22 Robert 'Blatchford 

of quiet and thoughtful people. It offered a 
change, too, from the environment of the old 
strolling life, which experience and his 
mother's constant voice had taught him to hate. 
It was a change to be " respectable.'* 

There may have been another inducement to 
regular attendance at chapel. Amongst the 
workpeople at the brush factory there was a 
" little proud, pretty thing with flaxen hair 
and sharp, dark eyes." She was a chapel-goer. 
" R. B." fell in love with her or became fond 
of her when he was sixteen years old. When 
he was twenty-nine he married her. 

It seems a silly thing solemnly to announce 
the existence of Mrs. Blatchford and the 
Blatchford children to an audience largely 
composed of Clarion readers ; but a biography 
is a biography, and one must state facts. 
I have, therefore, the honour to announce that 
Mrs. Blatchford is living (and likely to remain 
so, so long as there is a bargain to be had at 
Liberty's or a stair-rod to criticise in her 
house), and that Mr. and Mrs. Blatchford have 
three children Winnie and Dolly and Corri. 
Corri is a boy, and bears the maiden name of 
his grandmother. 

" R. B." led a hard but not unhappy life, of 
the vegetable kind, in Halifax until he was 
twenty. He worked steadily at the brush 
factory for six years and a few odd months 
and weeks and days. Then, of a sudden, on 



'Boyhood 



the oddest day of all, the steadiness suddenly 
went out of him. 

This brings us to the story of the Great 
Adventure. 



Chap. III. The Qreat 
^Adventure 



ONE morning a bright spring morning 
"R. B.," aged twenty, walked to 
the brush factory. When he got 
there the gates were shut. He had been 
guilty of a chronological inexactitude, and 
had arrived five minutes after six o'clock. By 
the rules of the factory he was shut out for a 
"quarter " that is to say, he could not enter 
and take up his work until after the breakfast 
interval at nine. 

Being a philosophical young gentleman, Mr. 
Blatchford resolved to devote the period of his 
forced abstention from labour to the enjoyment 
of natural beauties. These, he assured me, 
existed in the neighbourhood of Halifax thirty 
years ago. Perhaps he speaks comparatively. 
At any rate, he walked and walked until he 
found some water and a bridge, where he rested 
and ate his breakfast After which he leaned 
upon the parapet of the bridge and gazed upon 
the chimneys and the smoke of Halifax, which 
lay below him. Then, shifting his view-point, 
he gazed upon a different scene a scene of 



26 Robert 'Blatchford 

rustic beauty. And being a philosopher, he 
philosophised. 

"Why," he mused, "when there are trees 
and fields and birds and a blue sky like yon, 
should one be compelled to spend one's life in a 
stinking factory in a stinking town beneath a 
dirty pall like yon? " And, being a philoso- 
pher, he again said, "Why?" And, being 
a philosopher, he found the proper answer, 
which was: "Why?" 

Having been thus prosperously delivered of 
an entirely sound idea, Mr. Robert Blatchford 
promptly acted on it. He threw away the 
paper which had contained his morning's 
stodge, waved a long farewell to Halifax, and 
walked to Hull. 

Thus began the great adventure. 

I do not know how far Hull may be from 
Halifax, or what the road is like, or whether 
" R. B." found it pebbly, or at what time he 
got to Hull. I only know that he got there. 
And found a friend a brushmaker like him- 
self, who worked at a brush factory in Hull. 

And now there falls to be related a fact 
wnich will give great pain to the True and 
Faithful : a fact which will greatly surprise 
the student of " R. B.'s " psychology. At Hull, 
" R. B." did a thing which is obviously at 
variance with his true character. He did an 
unconstitutional, unpremeditated, irregular, 
eccentric thing. In defiance of all the rules and 




Aged Twenty-two. 



The Great Adventure 27 



customs and regulations affecting the rights of 
man, he went to a brush factory and secured 
work as a skilled hand he being still an 
apprentice. (A voice : " There ye are Bill ! 
There's yer jolly Socialist! ") 

It is true that he was penniless and had a 
young man's appetite; but he knows that that 
is no excuse, and so do I ; and we are both 
sorry. He earned enough at the factory to 
keep himself and to save a few shillings. And 
he wrote home to Halifax, and was duly 
reproached and forgiven. 

When he had worked in the factory for two 
or three weeks a gentle instinct urged him to 
depart. He was doing a risky thing. The 
consequences arising from its discovery would 
be rather grave. He had not been found out, 
but the danger of being found out would be 
lessened by his departure, and, as he had saved 
a little money, he packed up a little bundle and 
boarded a little ship and sailed to Yarmouth. 
From Yarmouth onwards his adventures ceased 
to support an air of comedy. 

He had but little money, and he wanted to 
go to London. So he walked to London. The 
distance from London to Yarmouth is 124 
miles : he walked it in about a week, sleeping 
in mean inns or hiring his bed at a cottage. 
And at last he got to London : to the city of 
Desire. 

That which followed is an exceedingly 



28 Robert 'Blatchford 

antiquated story : a story of disillusionment, 
disappointment, and despair. 

I could describe "R. B.'s " adventures in 
London at this time in my own fashion, but I 
am relieved from that gloomy task by the fact 
that they are all set forth by " R. B." himself 
in A Son of the Forge that spirited story of 
Army life which Mr. Blatchford began as a 
sketch in the Clarion , and which, to his own 
surprise and wonder, insisted upon growing 
and growing and growing until it finished 
as a full-blown novel. I am not going to 
discuss the book at this stage, but I am going 
to quote from it from Chapter VI., which is 
almost pure biography. 

" R. B." tells in this chapter how, sitting one 
night in a dismal coffee-house, he was touched 
by the misery of a little starveling boy who was 
in despair for want of a halfpenny to make up 
the price of his "doss." " R. B." befriended 
the boy whom, in the book, he calls Harry 
Fielding and it was this lad who first put into 
his head the notion of enlisting. This is how 
" R. B." tells the story : 

" . . . . The idea that he might have given 
the boy the halfpenny did not seem to have 
occurred to the waiter at all. I asked him to 
call the boy back and send him to me. 

" Then I counted my money. I had two 
shillings and a penny. Unless I found work 
to-morrow, I should be soon destitute. But 



The Great Adventure 29 

this was a cheap house, and the beds only six- 
pence, so that I was still rich enough to enter- 
tain a guest 

" The boy came back in a minute with the 
waiter. His name was Harry Fielding, and 
he appeared to be about fourteen years of age. 
He was very thin and pale, and his clothes were 
covered with white dust. I asked him to sit 
down, ordered him some tea, and waited for 
him to tell his story. 

" He had no parents. His mother had been 
dead five years. His father, a soldier, 
discharged as unfit for service, had died in 
Dover workhouse a month ago. The boy, 
after trying to enlist for a drummer, and being 
rejected owing to a defect in his left hand, 
had lived upon the charity of the soldiers in the 
Shorncliffe Camp until the provost had expelled 
him, when he set off and tramped to London. 

" He had walked twenty-five miles that day 
along the dusty roads without food, and had 
sold his waistcoat and neckerchief for fivepence 
to a Jew clothes-dealer. He told me, with the 
ghost of a smile, how he had spent an hour in 
fruitless efforts to persuade the Jewjo give him 
another penny, and how the waiter in the coffee- 
room had sent him out to beg for the same 
amount. ' But/ said he, with a sigh, ' I could 
only get a halfpenny, and he wouldn't let me 
in until I had sixpence. 1 

" He was a quiet little fellow, and I was glad 



30 Robert *Blatchford 

of his company. We shared our coppers while 
they lasted, and when they were spent we 
foraged for food by day and slept in the 
streets by night. Sometimes we got a box to 
carry, or a horse to hold, and earned a few 
pence by that. But bread was dear and times 
were hard, and we could barely keep body and 
soul together. 

" I could get no work. Trade was slack, 
many men were out of employment, and my 
ignorance of the city, as well as my provincial 
dialect, were against me. I sold my spare 
shirt, then my waistcoat; then I sold my new 
boots and bought some old ones, netting a 
shilling on the exchange, but at the end of a 
week we were at the end of our tether, and 
starvation stared us in the face. 

" It was Friday night, wet and dismal, and 
after many fruitless efforts to earn the price 
of a crust, we stole into a court off Drury Lane, 
and went to sleep in a doorway, which afforded 
some shelter from the rain. 

" When I awoke in the morning I found 
myself alone. Harry had gone, and had 
pinned to my coat his note of farewell, written 
on a bit of the margin of a newspaper. The 
note said simply : 

" Good-bye ; I'm off. Thank you for being so good to me. 
Look to yourself. I will try the road. Keep up your 
spirits. Yours, HARRY. 

"P.S.If you can't hold out, try the soldiers. 



The Great Adventure 31 

" It was useless to look for him. He might 
be miles away by this. I walked down to the 
dock gates and tried for a job; but there was 
a crowd, and the men shouldered me out of 
their way, each one trying to get first, and 
I was too miserable to fight. Why should 
I? What did it matter? I left the docks 
and wandered about the streets till nightfall, 
when I made my way to the police office 
to ask for a ticket for the casual ward at 
Clerkenwell Workhouse; for it was raining, 
and the wind was cold, and I was wearied 
out." 

" R. B." goes on to relate a strange 
adventure which befel him outside the gates 
of the police-station where he waited, in com- 
pany with a host of other vagrants, for the 
gates to open. He sat down on the pavement, 
close beside a miserable woman : 

" . . . . She was a swarthy woman, her skin 
tanned by long exposure to the weather. She 
wore no bonnet, and was smoking a short black 
pipe. I watched her for some time, and thought 
what a bold, hard, wicked face she had, and at 
length, more from curiosity to hear her speak 
than from any desire for information, I 
ventured to ask her a question about the 
tickets. 

" She turned upon me with a scowl which 
gradually melted away as she looked at me, 
and at last said, not unkindly, * What do you 



32 Robert Elatchford 

want to know for, boy ? You're not going to 
Clerkenwell, are you? ' 

" I said I was. She sat smoking for a few 
minutes, then took her pipe from her lips, and, 
stroking her chin with her great brown hand, 
said, very much to my surprise, ' You mustn't ; 
no, you mustn't. You're only a boy, and not 
used to no kind o' wickedness, I can see. Don't 
you go, boy ; don't you go.' 

"I have no other place to sleep,' I said. 

" She shook her head. ' Sleep in the streets ; 
boy, sleep on the bridges; anywhere but there. 
It's the worst workhouse in all London. No, 
you mustn't go.' 

"'But you are going,' I hinted. 

" The woman laughed. ' Oh, me,' she said. 
' It's good enough for me. But you are 
different. Ah, don't be stubborn. Take an 
old woman's advice. It's a cruel place. Don't 
go, don't go/ 

" ' I'm not a child,' I said 

" She laughed again, not pleasantly, and 
answered, ' You know nothin', nothin*. I know 
all. Been through it all.' 

" Then, very earnestly, she continued, 
leaning closer to me : ' Be advised, now. Be 
told. I know these places; and I've had sons 
of me own. Don't go, don't go. D'ye hear? ' 

" I rose up wearily from the pavement. ' I 
will take your advice,' I said. 

" She nodded, and put the pipe back in her 



The Great Adventure 33 

mouth. 'Good/ she said, 'good boy. Now 
you're talkin',' and turned her attention 
another way." 

But of all the queer doings of that queer 
time, the queerest was the final doing : that 
which " did " " R. B." into the Army for seven 
years. He relates in this chapter how he fell in 
with a poor girl who asked him for some bread, 
and who, on hearing that he was as breadless 
as herself, said: "Well, blood's warm, 
chummy; come and sit aside o' me." " R. B." 
sat down beside her and watched her through 
the night. Then : 

" Very early in the morning the market carts 
began to rumble over the bridge. The child- 
woman awoke, and looked at me with a smile. 

"'We must go,' she said. 'Early risin' an' 
late breakfasts is the rule in this hotel.' She 
got up shivering, and tried to straighten her 
hair with her fingers. 

" ' Where are you going ? ' I asked. 

" ' With you, if you like,' she said. ' Neither 
of us has nothin', and we might as well share.' 

" I shook my head. ' No,' said I, 'not that. 
Let me see if I can get a few coppers for you.' 

"'You're not going to give me the slip?' 
she said. 

" ' No.' 

"I'm nothing to nobody, I ain't,' she said, 
her eyes filling with tears ; ' but you won't leave 
a poor girl all alone, will you, chummy ? ' 

D 



34 Robert Elatchford 

" I said I would come back if I was 
alive." 

" R. B." lived and did come back. He came 
back with a shilling, the "Queen's Shilling," 
which he gave to her. He had enlisted at 
Tower Gates as a soldier. 

We show a picture of him as he appeared 
in uniform when he had barely passed the 
recruit stage of his service. At the time when 
this portrait was taken he had just celebrated 
his twenty-first birthday. 

"R. B." has often told me about that poor 
girl who slept beneath the same bridge with 
him, and about young Fielding. I remember 
that we talked about them once while sheltering 
from the rain under a hideous arch near Black- 
friars Station. " R. B." described the boy to 
me, and, of a sudden, it struck him with all the 
force of a wholly new idea that if that youth 
should stand before him then it would not be as 
a boy, but as a decidedly middle-aged man. 
"R. B." had often thought and wondered 
about the boy he does still but in all his 
speculation it had never occurred to him that 
the boy would grow up and smoke tobacco and 
drink beer. We amused ourselves for half an 
hour by trying to imagine the present aspect 
and fortune of the boy. . . . We settled, at 
last, on neck-protector whiskers and wide 
trousers, and we put him into possession of a 
comfortable marine store in Shad well. , 



The Great Adventure 



35 



We have brought " R. B." at last to the point 
of enlistment. It is now that the story of his 
psychological development begins. The Army 
made a physical man of him : it sowed also 
the seeds of his moral and mental manhood. 



Chap. IV. The 




UPON enlistment (1871), " R. B." was 
drafted to the iO3rd Regiment, which 
has since been reconstituted as a 
battalion of the Dublin Fusiliers. 

The iO3rd had been a John Company's 
Regiment All the old soldiers within its ranks 
had spent years of their lives in India. Mr. 
Blatchford's military novels (Tommy Atkins 
and A Son of the Forge], and his collection of 
short soldier stories called Tales for the 
Marines, present a delightful gallery of 
military portraits. It takes all sorts of men 
to make up regiments and worlds : it took a 
particularly varied and startling lot of gentle- 
men to make up "the Ramchunders " by 
which name " R. B." distinguishes his regiment 
in print. The most startling thing in connection 
with the Ramchunders is the change which they 
wrought in " R. B." He joined them as a 
solemn, sullen, sickly, awkward lad. He left 
them a high-spirited, quick-witted, cultured, 
observant man. 

It is worth while, I think, to interrupt here 
tiie strictly biographical course of this under- 
taking, while we consider that phenomenon. 

In discussing the influence upon " R. B." of 



38 Robert Elatchford 

his life in the Army, we must divide him into 
his two proper parts : 

(1) Writer, poet; 

(2) Reformer and politician. 

Viewing him in either capacity, one perceives 
that we are reaping now what the men of the 
Ramchunders sowed. 

You have only to talk with " R. B." for half 
an hour in order to discover that the whole man 
hinges upon those six years of rough-and- 
tumble in the Army. He lived those years with 
the naked souls of a thousand other men, and 
that experience afforded him a better education 
in the science of Souls and Things and Causes 
than he could have gained from six Universities 
or ten Grand Tours. 

At a University boys are associated with 
boys in a certain community of interests and 
enthusiasms. They meet, broadly speaking, 
on common ground in respect of worldly 
experience, worldly knowledge, spiritual 
ideals, social ideals, wit, common sense, 
insolence, the things which they do not know, 
the things which they want to know, and 
the things which they will never know; and in 
respect of manners, prejudices, and affectations. 
This community of interest can be limited or 
extended at the will of the individual. He has 
(assuming him not to possess an intellect or any 
other ungentlemanly attribute) a recognised 




. <2." AS A " 



The Army 39 



right of privacy and the material means for 
securing it. 

But a boy who goes for a soldier goes 
directly into action. He " sweats with a 
tumult." He will find some other boys in the 
same place; but there is no guarantee as to a 
community of anything except poverty, youth, 
and an interest in evading "Red Caps." If 
there are a hundred of these boys, then there 
will be nearly a hundred distinctions of per- 
sonality genuine differences produced by 
genuine diversity of training, experience, and 
example. Recruits in a barrack-room will not, 
from their childhood upwards, have been 
folded in the same way and creased in tlv 
same place like the highly-standardised young 
gentlemen who emerge from Oxford to throw 
the weight of their shining individualities 
against the levelling-down proposals of 
Socialism. 

But the boy who goes for a soldier will not 
only have to take the mear.ure of other and 
really different boys ; he will have also to keep 
his foothold amongst men, all sorts of men : 
old men, young men, laughing men, careful 
men, clean men, greasy men, clever men, and 
nice men; men who have met things, men who 
have seen things, men who walked there, men 
who got there, men who were carried .there, 
men who like women, men who have 
killed women, men who, one and all, 



40 Robert 'Blatchford 

have lived and are alive; silent men also and 
seers and fools and rogues and pimps and 
bullies and common grocers. These are the 
men whom a boy will meet with in a barrack- 
room, and these are the men whom " R. B." met. 
And he did not meet them just when and how 
he chose. He lived with them always, day and 
night. He mixed with them upon terms of 
continuous, unlimited, and illimitable 
familiarity for six years. Do you think it 
possible, bearing in mind the fact that he has 
experienced this ordeal, bearing in mind the 
fierceness of the ordeal do you think it 
possible that " R. B." can have any use at all 
for the ordinary theories which are held by men 
concerning men ? Do you think that he can 
hear without smiling your talk about good 
chaps, and bad chaps, and moral chaps, and 
silly chaps? 

"R. B." has "learned" men. He learned 
them in the Army. 

He learned his Socialism in the Army, too. 

One knows, of course, that " R. B." did not 
actually think about Socialism until years after 
he had left the Army. But I am nevertheless 
sure that his Army experiences did much, if 
merely in retrospect, to provoke and stimulate 
and fashion the faith which is in him. 

See how perfect, how concise a reproduction 
of the Problem was before him. It was a 
working model of the whole thing. Upon the 



The Army 4 1 



one hand he had a shining example of the 
virtues of combination, of discipline, of the 
common working for a common end and of 
what wonders the application of this principle 
may produce. Upon the other hand, he was 
continually witnessing and acting in a highly- 
compressed but very lively version of the drama 
called " Every man for himself and devil 
take the hindmost." That is not the motto 
of the Army; but it is the motto of the 
soldier. " Concentrated Effort " is the strong 
suit of the Army. "Individual Merit" (meaning 
Individual Shove) is the principle on which 
soldiers work and are worked. 

" R. B." soon learnt how to shove. But he 
shoved fair so fairly as might be. 

"So fairly as might be." Let me explain 
this qualification. One knows, apart altogether 
from the testimony of his old comrades, one 
knows, because one knows " R. B.," that he 
was kind to all his military inferiors and a 
friend to all his friends. But men who sought 
to take advantage of him; men who grudged 
him his promotion; men who envied him; men 
who merely hated him (and " R. B.," not being 
a character in fiction, encountered all these 
men), found out that he could push. " R. B." 
was not a Prophet then. He was a heavy-jawed 
young man of twenty, faced with the alterna- 
tives of shoving or being shoved. As I say, he 
shoved so fairly as might be. 



42 Robert Elatchford 

What a perfect little miniature of the whole 
wild scheme was this barrack life! " R. B." 
has often told me how the soldiers hate a thief 
a mean thief, a sneak thief. If a 
soldier sneaked another soldier's button 
stick, the whole society of the barrack-room at 
once combined to make things lively for the 
thief just as our society contrives to apply 
correctives to the pickpocket. But when it 
came to high-class, intellectual thieving the 
faking of accounts, the intelligent manipula- 
tion of canteen finance, the science of short 
reckoning, and so forth then the soldiers 
shrugged their shoulders. This was merely 
" business/* merely " life " the economic basis 
of their little world. 

"R. B." himself has pocketed the people's 
money. (Sensation!) This was when, by 
Individual Merit, he had climbed the social 
ladder to such a height that criticism became 
impertinence; when he was a Sergeant I need 
not describe the process by which he conducted 
this operation. The matter was connected with 
beer and his spell of duty as caterer to the mess 
a duty which every sergeant performed and 
abused in turn. Here the principle of noblesse 
oblige came in. Your turn to be "It" came 
round. You were told how to do it by one 
sergeant; you were helped to do it by another 
sergeant; you were watched doing it by all the 
other sergeants; you were obligingly relieved 



The A rmy 43 



of a small commission on it by the sergeant- 
major. And if you did not ; if you would not ? 
Ah ! that was where the principle of "shove " 
came in. 

They say that " R. B." is not a practical 
man. God's truth, he knows it all as well as 
Mr. Rockefeller. That solemn, impossible 
monomaniac, the good God's warning to those 
who court dyspepsia, stands now, at seventy- 
something, where Blatchford stood at 24. 
" R. B.," the unpractical, has climbed up a 
ladder of common sense and logic and honesty 
to a point which Mr. Rockefeller could not even 
see through a telescope. " R. B." has repaid 
his debt to the people a thousand times over. 
Rockefeller teaches in a Sunday school and 
has allowed the Devil, God be praised, to take 
his stomach. This fellow is really no more 
practical than the righteous are. 

This sort of thing which was perpetrated by 
the "upper and middle classes " in " R. B.'s " 
regiment is done to-day in every regiment, so 
sure as there is an England. What else can 
you expect ? The people, and things, and ideas 
which have made our England what she is have 
invented and inspired her Army. 

Because I cannot be sure that this book will 
not be read by pudding-heads, I have to 
point out the obvious fact that in doing (at 
24) what all his peers and equals did what all 
his fellow-sergeants taught him to do and 



44 Robert TMatchford 

expected him to do " R. B." was merely being 
a gentleman; was merely " playii g the game," 
just as our bishops, and dukes, and brewers, 
and stockbrokers play the game. 

He played the game quite fairly, according 
to its rules. But when he had grown older and 
had read books and had seen facts and had 
found his mind, he perceived that the rules of 
the game were lopsided and impossible and 
altogether wrong. And he has devoted his life 
to proclaiming this wrong. But do not, there- 
fore, hug to your souls the belief that he is 
" unpractical." 

When excited jute merchants tell you that 
" R. B." is a dreamer, a visionary, tell them 
this story of his youth; how he "played the 
game " and made a profit on other people's 
beer. The jute merchant will then respect 
"R. B." 

And so we see that the " Ramchunders " had 
to teach Mr. Blatchford in the matter of Men 
and Life. But the regiment performed for him 
other services. It drilled him out of sickness 
into health; it "shoved " him into strength of 
purpose; it chaffed him into geniality ; it offered 
him friends and the leisure to read books. 



ap- IP* More Army 



I SAID in the last chapter that when Mr. 
Blatchford entered the Army he was a 
solemn, sullen, awkward lad. This de- 
scription may not be literally exact; it is 
always difficult to describe exactly a landscape 
which one has not seen. 

But " R. B." tells me, and his wife tells me 
also, that he was a solemn, serious, silent lad. 
The sullenness I have ventured to add, because 
it seems to me that any young gentleman 
having lived through the bitter experiences 
which led up to " R. B.'s " enlistment and who 
had found no better way out of them than 
that afforded by a bottle-nosed recruiting 
sergeant would not, as he practised the techni- 
calities of the goose-step, be feeling altogether 
sunny. 

But regular food and the nonsense of the 
other chaps soon began to improve the temper 
and constitution of our friend. Also, he liked 
soldiering : he liked the drills, he liked his 
fine tunic; above all, he liked the shooting. 
He was a puritan young gentleman ; he was 
a little dour; a little moody and mysterious; 
but he could " shoot." He " could shoot like 
an angel," as his cot-mates said, and that fact, 



46 Robert Elatchford 

combined with a recognition of the circum- 
stance that he always " played fair," moved 
his comrades to forgive him for his virtues. 
" R. B." has often told me how the grim old 
buff-sticks, the "long-service" soldiers, deeply 
learned in iniquity, would collect around his 
cot and pay him mock-worship mock-worship 
which possessed more than a touch of sincerity. 

" Look at 'im ! " they would say. " 'E don't 
drink, 'e don't fight, 'e don't swear, 'e don't 
collect no sweet'earts, and yit 'e can shoot 
like a angel ! " 

Quite early in his service he found a friend 
one Joe Norris, a lively young gentleman, 
the tale of whose impertinences would fill a 
book. Mr. Joseph Norris, whom I have had 
the pleasure of meeting, is now a successful 
man of business and the father of a family. 
There is, however, a Ramchunder gleam in 
the white of his eye which makes me believe 
the incredible stories that " R. B." tells: 
those wonderful stories which bubble out of 
" R. B." all day long, and which always begin 
and end with what Joe Norris said. 

Most of these tales, but not quite all of 
them, you will find in " R. B.'s " story-books. 
Many of you know these tales by heart; the 
others must get and read them. These books 
will naturally be reviewed by me in due place, 
but I wish that considerations of form and 
unity and expense did not prevent me from 



More Army 47 



printing half-a-dozen of them here. With the 
exception of that which is the best tale of them 
all (I refer to the unforgettable romance of 
" The Scrumptious Girl "), the most important 
of these stories are biography, pure and simple. 
The one I should most like to set out here is 
the story of " The Black M.P.'s." It describes 
how " R. B.," when in charge of a picket, 
arrested and ran in four military police- 
men. It is a touching, simple story, and any- 
body who has read it once will re-read it 
twenty times. I have heard Mr. Blatchford 
tell it. 

Mr. Blatchford has written most of his 
soldier stories in the form of "cuffers," which 
is Tommy Atkins' name for a story. The 
stories are set out in dialogue form, and the 
word " Boots ! " followed by the word 
" Spurs ! " recurs often throughout the tale. 
This is a piece of realism. The soldiers' time 
for telling cuffers is after lights out, when the 
barrack-room is in darkness and the men are 
in bed. " The form of procedure," says 
Mr. Blatchford, in a foreword to Tales for the 
Marines, " is much the same in all regiments. 
Private Noaks requests Private Stokes to ' spin 
us a cuffer.' Stokes calls ' Attention ! ' and 
then says ' Boots ! ' to which the men reply in 
chorus ' Spurs ! ' The ' cuffer ' then begins, the 
'spinner' testing the interest and wakefulness 
of his audience by interjecting the word 



48 Robert Blotch ford 



' Boots ! ' at such intervals as may seem 
advisable." 

" Boots ! " with its countersign " Spurs ! " has 
been adopted by Clarion readers as a special 
form of greeting by which they make their 
presence known one to the other in public 
places. 

When he performed the devil's prank which 
is recorded in " The Black M.P.'s," " R. B." had 
long grown out of his "solemn" stage. I do 
not know how long his solemnity lasted, but 
I suspect its disappearance to have been 
coincidental with the advent of Joe Norris. 

Mr. A. M. Thompson once told me a story 
about Joe Norris. Thompson then a boy 
was invited by a gentleman to play at cards. 
He did so, and the gentleman cheated him. 
Shortly afterwards, A. M. T. related this 
circumstance to Mr. Norris. " Lead me to your 
friend," said Mr. Norris; "7 will play cards 
with him," adding, explanatorily, " I've served 
seven years in the Army." Mr. Thompson 
produced his friend, and Mr. Norris adminis- 
tered a life-long cure. 

This anecdote points the moral that soldier- 
ing is soldiering; and even at the risk of 
being mistaken for a parrot, I will ask you once 
again to remember that " R. B." has " soldiered." 
Get out of your minds at once, you who do 
not know him, the notion that " R. B." in any 
way resembles a Nonconformist minister. He 



More Army 49 



is a thoroughly human being, who, as the 
vulgar expression goes, " has been through the 
mill." He is as much now as he ever was a 
cheerful, impudent, careless, jolly, you-be- 
damned sort of a soldier. At the same time 
he possesses knowledge, culture, sympathy, 
logic, and abundant tenderness and humour. 
Mix all these qualities together and employ 
your imaginations, and you will know " R. B." 
But do not think of him as a " goody " man. 

During the whole of his military service 
" R. B." was a teetotaler. He tells me that 
while in the Army he " did not read much." 
Cricket, shooting, and performing the Un- 
expected were his chief amusements then. But 
he did read Chaucer, Leigh Hunt, Cowper, 
Mark Twain, George Eliot, Bronte, and 
Fielding. Dickens he already knew, and 
Bunyan and Defoe, and De Quincey and 
Thackeray and Ruskin. This list of books 
may not represent " much " to " R. B." now, 
but many persons would consider that an 
infantry sergeant who carried such things in 
his head had not ill-treated himself in the 
matter of culture. 

The military authorities evidently thought 
well of his attainments, for when he was 
promoted to be a sergeant in 1874, tne y 
granted him a Second-class Certificate of 
Education. The front page of this document 
we reproduce with a view to creating mirth. 

E 



50 Robert Watchford 



Upon the inner sheet of this document it is 
stated that No. 4,231 possesses the capacity to 
read and write; also that he possesses "the 
requisite proficiency in numeration and no 
more" The italics are mine. 

That which helped him most in the develop- 
ment of his literary instinct was, in " R. B.'s" 
opinion, the fact that, while soldiering, he 
wrote a great number of letters. I have tried 
in vain to trace some of these letters. The 
following fragment has, however, been handed 
to me by " R. B." himself, who says that it is 
copied, word for word, from a letter which he 
wrote at this time : 

". . . . A very old house, and a very big 
one, with a score or two of rooms dotted about 
in a labyrinth of crooked passages, and tacked 
together with crazy flights of stairs. A great, 
solemn, solid stone house that had seen better 
days. A house with a wilderness of garden 
overgrown with weeds behind, and a row of 
gaunt, uncanny-looking poplars ranged along 
in front like a gigantic guard that had turned 
out to present arms, and had forgotten to turn 
in again. A house infested with rats and bats 
and crickets and mice and cockroaches. A house 
of the draughtiest, creakiest, dustiest kind, all 
full of corners and recesses hid in gloomy 
shadow. A house that had been a mansion and 
a ladies' school and a smugglers' haunt, and 
was come down to be a barracks. Often have 



W. 0. Form 1164, 

V- R. 

SECOND GLASS 
CERTIFICATE OF EDUCATION. 

AWARDED TO 



On thf; recommendation of the Inspector of Army 
Schools 

by 




Commanding /. 



More Army 5 1 



I sat alone in the topmost room, with one 
rushlight making darkness visible, and listened 
to the creaking of the stairs and racing of the 
rats and sighing of the wind till I could have 
found in my heart to see ghosts by the double 
company. 

" But I never saw any. There had, we were 
told, been a violent death in every room in 
the house save one, and in that room one of 
our men shot himself. But I never saw a ghost. 
Only one night I was on guard, and the dead 
man was lying in the guard-room, and I fell 
asleep. And when I woke the candle had 
burned down into the socket, the fire was out, 
and the moon shone through the window. The 
first thing that met my eyes was the stark 
figure under its white sheet. I sat up ; I looked 
round; there was no one in the room but 
myself and it. 

" I didn't see a ghost I didn't wait. I just 
jammed my busby on, and left the guard-room 
in three hops and a skip; and I never went 
back that night. It was warm weather, and 
sitting in the garden smoking a pipe and talk- 
ing to the sentry was good enough for me. 
But I saw no ghost." 

This document makes it clear, of course, that 
" R. B." knew all the elements of the trade 
while he was still a soldier. This is writer's 
writing. It also tells us plainly what writer 
most influenced " R. B." at this time. The 



52 Robert 'Blotch ford 

fragment is pure Dickens from top to bottom. 
But then, " R. B." himself says that even now, 
looking back over all the many literary 
enthusiasms to which he has thrilled, he would 
still place Dickens first on the list of writers 
who have influenced him. 

" R. B.'s " literary gifts were known and 
admired in the regiment. An old comrade of 
his described to me recently a burlesque which 
" R. B." wrote to amuse the detachment then 
stationed at Popton Fort " R. B. " not only 
wrote the words of this stage-play (not one 
fragment of which remains to make him blush), 
but he designed and painted the scenery for its 
production. The gentleman to whom I have 
referred told me that the officers came in to see 
the performance, and that one of them remarked 
to him that it was very clever. " Yes," said 
my informant, " Sergeant Blatchford is a very 
clever man." " I suppose he is," said the officer, 
yawning. 

One cannot help wondering what would have 
happened to " R. B." if he had remained in the 
Army. " Spotting " cleverness is obviously 
not a strong point with our officers. One cannot 
imagine a civilian employer of brains allowing 
" R. B." to walk out of his employment as 
" R. B/' was allowed to walk out of the Army. 
Those who know him will, I think, agree with 
me in saying that he has all the qualities neces- 
sary to successful military command. He has 



More Army 53 






great presence of mind, great resourcefulness, 
great personal courage; he has quickness of 
perception, unlimited self-control, a fine bump 
of strategy, and a magnetic personality. He 
has the finest moustache in England. For all 
that, he would have made, perhaps, but an 
indifferent butcher. It is remarkable, however, 
that nobody thought of trying him. 

And anyhow, why not the Stores depart- 
ment? "Superior" men in the lower ranks of 
our Army are nearly always rewarded with 
an honorary lieutenancy and a quartermaster- 
ship, and sometimes the governorship of a gaol 
to follow. If things had followed their proper 
and accustomed course, " R. B." might now 
be worrying Suffragettes in Holloway. 

But they let him go. 

Once, when he had completed about five 
years' service, they nearly promoted him to 
the important post of regimental sergeant- 
instructor in musketry. But one of his innocent 
little pranks (this time unconnected with Joe 
Norris) had stuck in somebody's memory. The 
coveted post was awarded to another. 

And, anyhow, " R. B." wanted to get married. 
And he knew enough about soldiering not to 
be desirous of introducing his young wife into 
barracks. Fortunately for us and for the 
Socialist movement, the Short Service Act had 
been put into force a few months before the 
date of "R, B,'s" enlistment. So that at the 



54 Robert 'Blotch ford 



end of six years and some odd months of 
service he was free to go. And he went. 

Soon after leaving the Army he happened 
on the works of Mr. Thomas Carlyle. 



Chap. PL Waiting 



MR. BLATCHFORD left the Army in 1 877, 
but he returned to it for a brief 
period in 1878, when there was talk 
of war with Russia, and " R. B.," in common 
with other soldiers of the reserve, was recalled 
to the colours. This second spell of service 
was brief in duration and unproductive of 
adventure, and it is sufficient for our present 
purposes merely to mention it. 

I may refer to one incident which " R. B.'* 
has related in connection with his brief 
experience as a Reservist. Amongst the 
soldiers who had been "called up" were a 
number of Militiamen members of the Militia 
reserve. These irregular soldiers were very 
irregular indeed, and one evening about thirty 
of them gave trouble by persistently lighting 
candles in their barrack-room after " lights 
out " had been sounded. The orderly-sergeant 
happened to be " R. B.," and when that young 
gentleman went upstairs to talk wise words 
unto the mutineers, he was received with con- 
tumely and epithets, the latter conceived in a 
spirit of imagery peculiar to the New Cut, from 
which village the Militiamen had been re- 
cruited. Whereupon " R. B.," knocking up 



56 Robert 'Blotch ford 

some regular soldiers from another room, 
marched them in on the Militiamen and placed 
the whole roomful under arrest. Three-and- 
thirty crestfallen irregulars found themselves 
suddenly transported to the "clink," where 
they had leisure to rehearse their parts of 
speech. " R. B." is essentially a quick thinker 
and possesses a useful gift of repartee, as this 
anecdote suggests. 

After leaving the Army, " R. B.," having 
first indulged himself in a pleasure-tramp 
through Wales, obtained work as a time- 
keeper with the Weaver Navigation Company 
at Northwich. Here he remained for some 
years. Nothing happened in particular until 
1880, when Mr. Blatchford got married. 

For the first two years of his married life he 
worked hard at grammar and shorthand ; vary- 
ing these amusements with cricket and rifle 
shooting. He had joined the Volunteers and 
won all sorts of prizes at the butts. It may be 
mentioned here that " R. B." has been in his 
time a very fine marksman quite up to what is 
now called " Bisley form." And even in these 
days at 57 years of age he can do things 
with a gun which are calculated to open the 
eyes of self-confident and vain-glorious Youth. 

Thus, for five years, " R. B." lived at North- 
wich a smooth, industrious, rather vegetable 
life; "vegetable" as to its outward seeming, 
that is to say. The inward parts of him were 



Waiting 57 



living rapidly all the time. He was reading 
much and learning and thinking. But it is 
hardly reasonable to expect that the aspect and 
growth of his spiritual being attracted much 
public notice in Northwich. He was, I 
suppose, to all outward appearance as 
"honest," "stalwart," "industrious," "civil," 
"obliging," "thrifty," and generally foolish 
as his fellows. Just a respectable working man, 
teetotal, it is true, and silent, and having a 
rather remarkable habit of laughing "inside" 
at all sorts of ordinary things, but at the same 
time quite "decent," even to the extent of 
wearing black clothes on Sunday and drinking 
cocoa. 

When this chapter appeared in serial form, I 
ventured to wonder how " R. B." "got on" 
with his fellow workmen at this period. How- 
did he behave to them ? What did he think of 
them ? What did he say to them ? And what 
was their opinion of him. 

This paragraph called forth a most interest- 
ing letter from one of " R. B.'s " old " mates " 
Mr. Thomas Palin, who now lives near Man- 
chester. 

Mr. Palin wrote me at great length and I 
am going to reprint nearly all of his letter; for 
I am sure that those people who read this 
sketch with understanding will agree with me 
that that simple document is quite the most 
valuable piece of testimony which it contains. 



Robert 'Blatchford 



Mr. Palin, I think, may be regarded as the 
spokesman of all his mates, and his letter 
makes it clear that the name of Robert Blatch- 
ford is now venerated amongst them, not 
merely in respect of his work as a writer and 
politician, but in remembrance of countless 
little acts of generosity and simple kindliness, 
such as those which Mr. Palin here describes. 

This is what Mr. Palin says : 

" I may say that I was a youth serving my 
apprenticeship as a boiler maker under the 
Trustees of the Weaver Navigation, at which 
Robert B latch ford was my timekeeper. He 
was also storekeeper. 

" I may say that we all looked up to Robert 
as one that was gifted; for if you went into his 
office he could do your photograph with his 
blacklead in a jiffy. He could also make 
verses, too. I remember something about the 
voyage of the ship, Soap Bubble (or some such 
title), and the consequent wreck on Frodsham 
Marsh. 

" I well remember we formed a cricket club, 
of which Robert was our captain ; and we work- 
ing men got a boat-load of green sods brought 
up the river, and we all went at nights and 
laid a large patch at a brick field with the 
sods, Robert Blatchford working as hard as 
any of us. 

" I also remember our having a match, 
Married v. Single, for a knife-and-fork tea 



Waiting 59 



the winners to pay is. 3d., losers is. gd, when 
we vanquished the said Robert and his host. 
My word, we did swipe them ! And they had 
to pay the piper. 

" I remember also that he had no swank, to 
use a modern phrase. He was a nice, sociable 
man ; not one of those upstarts that think a man 
working with his hands is inferior to him. Oh, 
no; a man's a man for a' that 

" I remember, also, my father was a captain 
of a vessel a lifting vessel ; and one time the 
vessel was doing nothing ; so father was told to 
stack some coal up in a field. Some men were 
emptying a coal boat lying in the river and 
they did it piece work, and when father's 
wages came down the river, he was this time 
short about IDS. The cashier said he must see 
these coal men for his money, but they dis- 
claimed any responsibility for it, as they had 
to empty the boat and not stack the coal. So 
it went on for about three months, I think, 

father seeing first one and then another 

My father was only getting 1 a week, and 
there were five youths and one girl at our house, 
and we could shift something. So in despair 
father went to Robert Blatchford. He was 
not his timekeeper, but he had dealings with 
him sometimes and he knew his man. So 
father went to him, and I fancy I can hear him 
saying it now : ' Well, John ? ' So father told 
his story and Robert said, when he had done : 



60 Robert 'Blatchford 



" ' The old devil ! I'll get it for you, John; 
leave it to me.' And it goes without saying 
that he got it. 

" We all knew if we were short of our time, 
if it was possible, Robert would put it right. 
Robert was a strong Liberal in those days, and 
he didn't half crow over a strong Tory, a fitter 
named Elliott. . . . 

" When he went to London to be a reporter 
on Bell's Life, I think it was at $ a week, 
we got up a presentation and had a tea at an 
hotel in the town, and presented Robert with 
a large album full of views of the river and 
district. 

" Robert was a good shot . . . and he had 
won the Volunteer's silver medal twice in suc- 
cession, and if he had won it that year it would 
have been his own." 

At this stage of his letter, Mr. Palin, who 
is a strong "believer," takes Mr. Blatchford to 
task for his agnostic sentiments. No useful 
purpose would be served by reproducing that 
portion of the letter here; but the fact that Mr. 
Palin so strongly differs from " R. B." in this 
respect may be noted, as giving emphasis to 
that which follows : 

" I remember one Whitsuntide, the men in the 
boiler shop got up a bit of a collection to re- 
ward me for being a good lad (I suppose). 
And I well remember that Robert Blatchford 
gave me 3d. . . .., 



Waiting 61 

"... Since writing the above I have seen my 
father and he said that Mr. Blatchford gave 
him the IDS. out of his own pocket, and he 
said : ' I will have it back before the cashier 
leaves the yard in the morning,' and he said: 
' Here you are, John ; go home and don't say 
anything to anybody.' He was full of 
righteous indignation at my father being 
treated so. 

" Another time Robert sent father with a bag 
to their house arid he said : ' Tell Mrs. Blatch- 
ford to give you 6d.' Father said, ' No, thank 
you,' but he had to have it whether or not. Mrs. 
Blatchford made him have it. 

" Father said if Robert saw one man trying 
to best another he would put his foot on it 
at once. In short, he was a working man's 
friend then as now, and a gentleman to boot; 
one of Nature's gentlemen. Long may he 
wave ! 

" He is doing far more good in my opinion 
that three parts of the parsons, notwithstand- 
ing his opinion regarding religion." 

I think that Mr. Palin's concluding sentiment 
will find an echo in the hearts of all Mr. Blatch- 
ford 's readers, whether they be Christian men 
or infidels. 

Arid if any cross-grained person should tell 
me that some of the facts for which I am 
indebted to Mr. Palin are trivial in character, 
I would point out to him that it is just such 



62 Robert Elatchford 

trivial facts by which we may judge of bigger 
things. 

I have often asked " R. B." to talk 
about his " mates " at Northwich, and he 
has talked about them by the hour. He 
has told me about the amazing carpenter 
who had an amazing story about Admiral Sir 
Cloudsley Shovel, and would narrate wild 
stones concerning the prowess and genius of 
that gallant person. He has told me about all 
sorts of queer and interesting men whom he 
got to know in Northwich. But he has 
never told me that which I wanted him 
to tell me. He has never told me what Mr. 
Palin tells me. 

When " R. B." had been living in a respect- 
able manner for five years he suddenly broke 
out and wrote a story. This was accepted 
and published by a paper called the 'Yorkshire- 
man, and "R. B.'s " life-long friend, Mr. 
Joseph Norris, has recorded the circumstance 
that "R. B." "walked on his heels." This 
story was called " The Militiaman," and it has 
been republished in a summer number of thf 
Clarion. It has all the qualities and all the 
faults which are common to first efforts 01 
clever writers. 

Thus encouraged, " R. B." wrote a few more 
stories, which were published here and there. 
He tried his hand at other things as well, and 
in 1884 was writing a weekly column of 



Waiting 63 



notes for a semi-comic paper called the Leeds 
Toby. 

In this year, also, he met with Mr. A. M. 
Thompson, a young gentleman who was 
destined to mingle his fortune rather intimately 
with that of " R. B." Mr. Thompson was one 
of the original founders of the Clarion; he has 
written for it regularly since its first number 
was published. He is " Dangle," and is known, 
and liked, and respected (in a peculiarly actual 
sense which only people who have been 
fortunate enough to work for the Clarion can 
understand) by a literally world-wide host of 
readers. Mr. Thompson is " R. B.'s " most 
intimate friend, and of all that gentle- 
man's admirers the most single-hearted and 
sincere. 

Mr. Thompson and " R. B." became 
acquainted through that same Joe Norris who 
has hereinbefore been mentioned. Mr. Norris 
stayed on in the Army after " R. B." had left 
it, but finding that the " Ramchunders " had 
lost much of their flavour since being deprived 
of the membership of his "pal," he bought 
his discharge and came to Northwich and 
found work there and saw much of his friend. 
But work of a more attractive kind being 
offered to Mr. Norris in Manchester, he 
deserted Northwich. In Manchester he became 
acquainted with young Thompson, who had 
just stepped into journalism, and was full of 



64 Robert JMatchford 

opulence and pride. It was Mr. Morris's happy 
custom to keep down young Thompson's tem- 
perature by a constant application of Blatch- 
ford. "You think you know" was (in effect) 
the daily refrain of Mr. Norris " but wait till 
you meet Bob Blatchford." 

At last young Thompson did meet this much- 
vaunted person. " R. B." has described the 
meeting in a paper contributed to the Clarion. 
He tells there how that when first he saw the 
solemn Dangle, the solemn Dangle was in bed ; 
six foot of lanky youth established firmly in 
"the pleasant land of counterpane," and 
reading the Koran. 

Mr. Thompson, so far, has refused to publish 
his own impressions of that meeting. But 
having been worried by the present writer, he 
has broken the silence of a lifetime. He has 
produced a charming little record, very vivid, 
very suggestive, of his first meeting with 
" R. B." 



Qhap. J^II. Journalism 
and Journalists 



IN an old summer number of the Clarion 
" R. B." published the following reflections 
on his first meeting with A. M. Thompson : 

" The first time I saw Dangle he was in his 
chamber reading the Koran. He reminded me 
of the song, ' My Sweetheart When a Boy/ so 
young, so innocent did he appear. And on his 
bed-quilt was embroidered the motto : ' Early 
to bed, early to rise, makes a man healthy, 
wealthy, and wise/ Pathetic indication of an 
early moral training. And this man, so young, 
was already a dramatic critic." 

This constitutes the sum of " R. B.'s " utter- 
ances concerning that historic meeting. Dangle 
is less reticent. Having been prevailed upon to 
break a silence which has lasted more than 
twenty years, he has broken it to some purpose 
and sends me the following vivacious and 
really helpful account of a meeting which was 
destined to exercise a very powerful influence 
upon the fortunes of both the men concerned. 

With characteristic bash fulness Mr.Thompson 
begins his letter by assuring me that he really 
has nothing to say. With a playfulness and 

F 



66 Robert 'Blatchford 

simplicity, equally characteristic, he goes on 
to say a lot : 

"We met in 1882, nearly twenty-seven years 
ago, at my mother's house in Boston Street, 
Manchester. A mutual friend, Norris, who had 
been a sergeant in the same regiment as 
Blatchford, had previously made us aware of 
each other, had incited us to some exchange 
of letters, had finally brought him over from 
Northwich, where Blatchford had, on leaving 
the Army, found a place as store-keeper. 

"To make you understand the humour of 
that interview as I see it now, I must begin with 
a personal preface. ' R. B.' was then thirty. 
I was an unfledged puppy of twenty. This 
figure is mixed, but it has to be double- 
barrelled to cover the ground. In extenuation 
of my U.P.'ishness, I may plead that I was very 
young, that I had been egregiously flattered by 
a large and congenial acquaintance of fools, 
and that I was earning more money as a writer 
of 'smart' paragraphs than I have yet attained 
to on the Clarion. 

" Conceive me, then, in these pre-Blatch- 
fordian times, an Unfledged Puppy spreading 
his peacock's tail to the gaze and secret 
mortification of all the other bantams on the 
walk. Conceive the wily Norris diligently 
nipping the U.P.'s blossoming cheek by 
dropping the insidious poison of his friend 
Rlatch ford's superior attainments into the 




During his Early Days as a yournalist. 



Journalism and Journalists 67 

swelling ear of the U.P.'s insufferable conceit. 
For example: If I quoted Mark Twain or 
Artemus Ward, Norris casually mentioned that 
his friend mostly read Emerson to breakfast, 
Plato to dinner, and Carlyle for supper. If 
I told of my afternoon's practice with Briggs 
and Watson at cricket, Norris would inspissate 
the night with fabulous tales of his friend's 
(Wilhelm) Telling marksmanship at Wimble- 
don. Even if I fell asleep he would try to 
rouse me with accounts of his friend's 
amazing wakefulness. It is a wonder I did 
not loathe his admirable friend. At any rate, 
I was fully fed up with him. And yet my 
disgust was tempered with a wholesome touch 
of awe. 

" Behold us now assembled, Norris glib and 
easy as ever, his friend very morose, the 
Unfledged Puppy chastened by nervousness. 
'R. B.' has recorded in another place that he 
found me reading the Koran. If so, I must 
have done it to give myself an air. One had 
to resort to desperate measures to encounter 
a man who read Emerson for breakfast. Be 
that as it may, I perceive dimly that I was 
disappointed and relieved. Norris's friend 
did not look formidable at all. He was not so 
tall as a Colossus, nor so bright as the wits at 
the Mermaid. Between ourselves, he looked 
countrified, chapelified, Northwichy. There 
was no military swagger about him. His 



68 Robert 'Blatchford 

clothes rather suggested the Nonconformist 
conscience than the soldier. 

" I have no more memory than a straw 
mattress, and I find it difficult to detach that 
day's impression clearly from later growths. 
But I picture him as a sort of brown man, a 
man of brown study, brown clothes, and brown 
eyes. They were more gentle and dreamy 
then the eyes, I mean, not the clothes they 
had not the fierce, quick, steely glint of later 
years. The face, too, was softer, lacking the 
aquiline fighting edge of these Berserker times. 
Something distinctly womanly about it, despite 
the swarthy, thick moustache. A gentle, firm- 
looking beggar, not at all truculent. 

" He was very quiet. Of course, I talked 
Carlyle had crammed a chapter or two for 
the occasion. He retorted with allusions 
to the last pantomime ! Then I breathed 
again. 

"As my bash fulness wore off, I probably 
became patronising : condescendingly encour- 
aged him to write, assured him kindly that my 
practised eye discerned merit in him, thought 
I could promise, with pains, to make a little 
man of him. It must have been funny. He 
was my senior, remember, by ten years. But 
I had lived in foreign parts, spoke tongues, had 
achieved a sort of twopenny celebrity, was 
already very middle-class-conscious and very 
young. 



Journalism and Journalists 69 

" He was grateful for my kind patronage, 
but not effusively so. And then, by degrees, 
imperceptibly, though he did not say much, 
he began to 'pervade.' He did not explicitly 
express scorn of the prospects I had unfolded 
to his ambition, but it was subtly borne in 
upon me that my glowing glories did not 
appeal to him. He did not overtly disparage 
my Economic Basis, but tacitly conveyed that 
a Philosophic Basis, as a foundation of 
conduct, might be more useful. 

"I had never thought of that before, and 
yet in my fine sufficiency I seemed to have 
thought of most things. A reasoned code of 
principles, he suggested, should be the first 
essential to any writer. None of the writers 
I had met had appeared to feel their want of 
it. But the idea struck me, as the Americans 
say, 'where I lived.' I mentally filed it for 
future reference. And there, or thereabouts, 
ended the first lesson. 

"Of course, I had no conception then of the 
number of lessons that were to follow, but 
I clearly remember that even then I regarded 
the meeting as an Event. I clearly remember 
that even in this first fumbling at acquaintance 
I was conscious that here was a character 
different from any I had met. He was cleaner 
than any man, except one, that I had met. 
There was more meaning in him, more strength, 
more determination, and, above all, more 



70 Robert 'Blatchford 

gentleness than in any man I had met. Even 
then I realised that here was a man utterly 
incapable of littleness in any sort. Even then 
I realised that here was a man whose friend- 
ship was a thing worth winning. In short, 
I knew, even at that first meeting, that I had 
met a Man." 

I think that this tells us all there is to tell 
about the " R. B." of that period : chapelified, 
Northwichy, cultured, self-confident, calm, dis- 
dainful, proud, right-minded, quick-witted, and 
possessed already of an entirely individual 
standpoint of faith. 

The "kind patronage" of which Mr. Thompson 
makes so light did actually provide "R. B." 
with the means of escape from his penal 
servitude at Northwich. 

The proprietors of the Sporting Chronicle 
at Manchester, which journal was the scene of 
Mr. Thompson's early triumphs, became 
interested in Bell's Life, of London. This 
"new interest" decided, after the manner of 
"new interests," to do all sorts of novel and 
surprising things with the old paper, not the 
least important of their decisions being to trans- 
form it from a weekly into a daily journal. 
" New blood," as the saying goes, became 
necessary to the proper conduct of this under- 
taking, and Mr. Thompson made bold to speak 
up for the rich, untapped corpuscles of his 
friend " R. B." 






Journalism and Journalists 71 

By this time " R. B." was the father of two 
children a girl and a boy and he has placed 
it on record that the weekly stipend accruing 
from his "billet" at Northwich amounted to 
twenty-seven shillings. " Domestic life on 
twenty-seven shillings a week," he said, 
" resembles the ready-made suit at one-and- 
a-half guineas; it is apt to prove a tight fit" 
His association with the Leeds Toby (before 
referred to) had eased the pinch a little, but 
this process was effected at a cost of some 
discomfort to the man inside the suit. The 
" copy " for this Leeds paper had, perforce, to 
be written all on one day and that day the 
Sabbath. The copy ran to five thousand words 
say twenty pages of this book and for this 
very solid contribution " R. B." received the 
staggering reward of a guinea. In these days 
he could readily command fifty guineas for the 
same quantity of work contributed to the 
capitalist Press. 

When the offer of a job on Bell's Life was 
submitted to " R. B.," you may well suppose 
that he quickly decided to doff his ready-made 
suit and face the unknown perils of profes- 
sional journalism. 

On March 24, 1885, he went to London. On 
the day following he became a journalist, and, 
to quote his own words, he "has never got an 
honest living since." 

He tells us that the reception which he met 



72 Robert Watchford 

with on Bell's Life was not a very hearty one. 
" The editor and resident proprietor were 
frosty, but not kindly. The former confided 
to the latter that I was el ' rank outsider ' ; the 
latter confided to the former that I had ' no 
more style than a cochin-china hen.' Six 
months later they quarrelled, and each told 
me what the other had said." 

But they found him plenty of work to do. 

He was engaged to write the " Echoes " and 
make himself generally useful. He thinks 
he did it. 

" I was often at work from ten o'clock one 
morning until one o'clock the morning follow- 
ing. I was sent to all kinds of places to do 
special articles on all kinds of subjects. 
I attended cricket matches, football matches, 
boat races, horse races, boxing contests, swim- 
ming contests, theatres, coach meets, sailing 
matches, military tournaments, picture exhibi- 
tions, brewers' exhibitions, sporting exhibitions, 
Imperial exhibitions, Lord Mayors' shows, 
pigeon shooting contests, dairy shows, cattle 
shows, and committee meetings of all kinds, 
including one committee meeting of sporting 
noblemen real live dukes, earls, and baronets." 

When " R. B " first joined the staff of Bell's 
Life that paper was conducted in a frigid a.nd 
respectable manner. But, subsequently, the 
editor was deposed and a new editor appointed. 
Then ah! then Bell's Life Office became 



Journalism and Journalists 73 

a strange and wonderful and delightful 
place. 

Under the benign reign of Pontifex II., as 
he was called in the office, Bell's Life was given 
over to mirth, good-fellowship, old port, and 
the scrap-heap. 

He seems to have been a live person, this 
Pontifex II.: a man and a brother; a gentle- 
man; an Admirable Crichton among editors. 
" R. B." wrote his portrait some years ago, and 
I cannot resist the temptation to quote some 
portion of that vivid sketch. 

Pontifex II., coming into the office within 
half-an-hour of the time appointed for "closing 
down," learns that the paper is three or four 
columns short; that the printers are standing 
for copy ; that several of the editorial gentle- 
men have failed to produce that which they 
have been instructed to produce. 

Says the master printer : 

" Miss our trains, as sure as eggs. For 
heaven's sake, sir " 

" Ha ! ha ! ha ! For heaven's sake, eh ? 
Didn't know they read BelVs Life up there ! 
Ha ! ha ! ha ! Eh ? Wish to Ged they'd buy 
it down here. Ha ! ha ! ha ! Well, gentlemen, 
to work, eh ? Phew ! " 

And this, according to " R. B.," is how 
Pontifex would get to work : 

" Phew ! Mr. Bounder, your pen of the 
ready writer, eh ? Phew ! I'll dictate ah 



74 Robert 'Blatchford 

Bleys eh ? Mr. Tucker, be so good as to ah 
get me Truth, World, Echo, Pink 'Un, and 
ah Phew ! scissors and paste. And ah 
Mr. Nunquam will, I'm sure ah facile pen 
ah special descriptive, crews at practice ah 
from tow-path ah facts from Evening 
Standard. Phew ! 

"Now, Mr. Bounder, although the Kings- 
clere colt shows rather more daylight under 
him than a strict connoisseur might wish 
damn this paste all lumps where's the Echo ? 
(snip, snap; dab, dab, dab) ah still, being 
sweet about the hocks and filled with the 
Pink 'Un, please blood of mighty sires 
here, Mr. Hall, are the first three pars general 
sport (snip, snap; dab, dab, dab) he may 
be expected to show a clean pair of heels to 
more than one crack if, indeed, does not 
prove himself (snip, snip, snap) finest horse 
Victorian Era Phew ! (dab, dab). Ask Mr. 
Hall how much general sport." 

" Thus," says " R. B." "... Would this truly 
great man steer, work, and captain his 
ship off the rocks, night after night, in 
less than thirty minutes. Pontifex II. ... was 
a man." 

You see what a queer, new world " R. B." was 
bundled into when he was bundled into his 
post on Bell's Life. The jolly, careless, " Irish " 
atmosphere of this place, the breezy methods 
of King Pontifex, must have taught much to 



Journalism and Journalists 75 

"R. B.," who had been schooled and nurtured 
in the stuffy air of chapel and amid the cast- 
iron laws of the barrack-room and the soul- 
mangling devices of mill and workshop. 

But on Bell's Life also he met with another 
influence, more powerful than all the rest com- 
bined. He met with E. F. Fay "The 
Bounder." 

This incident in "R. B.'s" life is so important 
that I must deal with it in a separate chapter. 



Chap. Fill. " The 

'Bounder" 



EVERYBODY who reads this sketch is not 
necessarily old enough in years or 
Socialism to remember " The Bounder " 
or to remember the Clarion when Fay wrote 
for it. 

For these reasons it is necessary that I should 
state facts which to many may seem rather 
commonplace. 

E. F. Fay, whose pen name was " The 
Bounder,'* wrote for the Clarion from the time 
of its foundation until his death in 1896. I 
have read much of his work and heard much 
about himself and his doings. 

" The Bounder " was a curious man, and he 
wrote curiously. Those who can appreciate the 
things which really matter in literature an 
individual standpoint, an individual faith, an 
individual touch, and an individual man 
behind all these will know how to appreciate 
" The Bounder's " work. It was curious, I say 
curious in its strength and sanity, and in its 
fine broad humour and perfect tolerance. It 
resembled in certain aspects the work of Sterne 
(a writer, I believe, who was much esteemed by 



78 Robert Elatchford 

Fay), but "The Bounder's*' work was free 
from those dabs of false sentiment and 
niggling artifice which disfigure the writings of 
Sterne. By the same token, therefore, Fay 
lacked something of the refinement and 
" polish ' ' which distinguished Sterne. Some 
of us may think that he was as well without it. 

Fay himself, Fay the man, has been 
described to me in a hundred different 
languages by a hundred different people. I 
need not attempt the almost impossible feat of 
re-describing these descriptions, for I propose 
in a little while to quote the words of " R. B." 

This man Fay was " R. B.'s " best and 
closest friend : the friend who has exercised 
most influence upon " R. B.'s" character, 
temper, and opinions. The Fay influence is 
even to be traced, at certain moments, in Mr. 
Blatchford's speech and looks. 

" R. B." has expressed in unmistakable terms 
his sense of the debt which he owes to the 
genial, stimulating comradeship of this big- 
hearted Irishman. "'The Bounder/" says 

"R. B.," "was a revelation The 

Chronicle boys told Fay that I did not know 
how to laugh. Laugh ? I was growing mouldy 
for something to laugh at, and I got it. ' The 
Bounder ' was funnier than his writing He 
was funny in character, in manner, in appear- 
ance. He was a new type. We went all over 
London together. We went to exhibitions and 




e. F. pjr ("THE 



"The 'Bounder" 79 

theatres together. We discussed all manner of 
experiences and life problems together. We 
swapped ideas about men and women and 
books. And I laughed all the time. It was a 
great time, and I laughed more in the first six 
months than in all the previous five-and-thirty 
years of my life.'* 

In an old Clarion Mr. Blatchford described 
the manner of Fay's first entry into the Bell's 
Life arena : 

"The advent of 'The Bounder 1 on his 
appointment to the Staff was striking. It was 
a foggy, miserable evening, and the streets 
were like open sewers. The Cackler (a 
colleague), breathless, splashed to the hair, 
rushed through the outer office crying, ' Here he 
is ! ' The Staff were all agog. The Cackler 
blocked the doorway with his angular figure. 
' The Bounder ' appeared, clothed in an acre 
of streaming ulster, looming like a mighty 
cloud. The Cackler wriggled, giggled, and 
looked more Japanese than ever; and then 
came a calm voice from the cloud : ' Ah ! Mr. 
Tucker, will you have the goodness to remove 
this bally old umbrella-stand from the door- 
way?"' 

This is what "The Bounder " looked like 
when he and " R. B." first met : 

"A huge fellow, six feet two, and eighteen 
stone, with a florid, rather stolid face, sleepy 
eyes, and a habit of pursing his lips and draw- 



8o Robert Watchford 

ing down his nose sarcastically. He was 
shabbily dressed, untidy.". ... "I can see 
him now as he strode across to the Cheshire 
Cheese, with his shoulders squared, his hat on 
the back of his head, and a big, heavy-headed 
bamboo stick under his arm. 

"'The Bounder' of 1885 was difficult to 
follow in conversation. His utterance was 
rapid, and quite half he said was in the manner 
of soliloquy, indistinct, half audible; added to 
which his strange jumbling of slang with 
quotations from authors ancient and modern, 
and his use of words and phrases of his own 
coinage, kept one guessing at his meaning.* ' 

Mr. B latch ford gives this as sample speech 
in the Fay language : 

" Haw ! You behold in me one out of suits 
with fortune. Pestilential person with the 
scythe hovers o'er domestic oasis with lethal 
O.P. optic fixed on the firstborn. Ha! Fate 
hath dealt the knock like Sullivan at twelve- 
stone-six. Poor blooming gentleman has 
copped the auctioneer. Very snide the poor 
sportsman is. Haw ! like old Billy Barley ' on 
the broad of his back, bless your eyes. J The 
poor blooming gentleman. Is there no hand on 
high to shield the brave ? And I that sucked 
the honey of his musie fizz must feel the deep 
damnation of his taking off. Grassed, my 
friend, the poor old sportsman's grassed ! And 
shall Trelawney die ? Haw ! You see how it 



The "Bounder " 81 



is. I am indifferent honest. One must back 
his friends. Who else shall nil the cruse and 
sponge his features frail ? I will never desert 
Mr. Micawber. The poor gentleman, the poor 
old sportsman, haw ! Kismet, scrape thyself ! 
I say ' he shall march, by God.' ' 

"Which," says Mr. Blatchford, "being 
rightly heard and shrewdly translated, meant 
1 My brother is nearly dead of typhus fever, 
and I must go home and attend to him.' 5 

I never saw Fay; but I know him well. He 
was the friend of all my friends, and lives in 
their fireside talk and jokes and metaphors. 
But nobody knew him as " R. B." knew him, 
and nobody talks of him as " R, B." does. 

Here is Fay's own description of his first 
encounter with " R. B." in Bell's Life Office: 

" The non-managing partner led me into a 
dark, disagreeable room, in the corner of which 
was a little, dark, disagreeable-looking person, 
writing at a little, dark, disagreeable desk. I 
couldn't see his face, as he was bent over the 
desk ; but his back was visible, and it occurred 
to me that in the whole course of my mundane 
experience which had been pretty peculiar and 
fairly extensive I had never sampled such a 
distinctly ' humpsome ' dorsal development. 

'You have there,' said the non-managing 
partner, loftily waving his hand, in the direc- 
tion of the files, ' all the numbers of Bell's Life 
since the first issue in 1826. If you look 

G 



82 Robert 'Blatchford 

through them you will find that you have had 
not unworthy predecessors. You will find,* 
he said, still more loudly and loftily, 'that 
Dickens, Thackeray, Jerrold, and other 
eminent men of letters have written for Bell's 
Life in London. This, I hope, will be an 
example and incentive to you.* 

" With this, like a nineteenth century Brutus, 
he departed, leaving me alone with the 
back. 

" Something seemed to have gone wrong with 
that back. It seemed to be trying to tie itself 
into a knot, and anon curling itself into a hoop, 
and seemed to be troubled with a curious, gulpy 
gurgling. A most offensive back. And when, 
eventually, it got up and walked out on its 
heels, I was much relieved." 

A few days later, Fay saw what he called 
"R. B.*s'* "front elevation,** and his mental 
note thereon was : " Morose and truculent to a 
degree. William of Orange with a dash of 
Black Ruthven.** 

But this, as " R. B.*' has said, was not 
" meeting ** : it was only " seeing.'* 

The two men met a little later. " R. B.'* was 
a sort of general handyman on Bell's Life. 
Fay was dramatic critic. A whisper went forth 
that "R. B.** would be required to deal with 
certain theatres, so as to save " Fay's fee" 
when possible. Instinct told " R. B.*' that 
Fay*s fee meant a good deal to Fay. There- 



"The Bounder" 83 

fore " R. B." sent Fay a little invitation, and 
the two men met and . . . became friends. 

"R. B.," the morose, the sullen, the North- 
wichy, woke up. He had found a fellow-man. 

The two friends entered into a partnership 
of ideas and pleasures. They went all over 
London together. " He kept me laughing most 
of the time." says " R. B.," " for he had a 
wonderfully keen eye for the ridiculous, and 
saw humours, as I saw pain, in the most un- 
expected places. His wit was very nimble, and 
he had a queer, whimsical fancy. Add to these 
qualifications the picturesqueness of his own 
character, his habit of mixing slang and 
poetry, profanity and ethics, racing talk and 
shrewd criticisms of Shelley, Dickens, Milton, 
and Bret Harte, and it may be well seen that 
' The Bounder ' was a fascinating and interest- 
ing study.'* . . . The two men, superficially 
so different, had much in common spiritually : 
they were qualified to help and enlighten and 
stimulate each other; they were "born to be 
friends,' 1 as the saying goes. Let me quote 
"R. B." again: 

". . . . I was rather strait-laced and, per- 
haps, in a way, inclined to a certain unfor- 
giving and self-righteous puritanism. ' The 
Bounder,' again, bore some resemblance to the 
unflattering portrait painted for me by the 
Manchester men. He certainly swore and 
drank too much. He was not free from in- 



84 Robert Watch ford 

tellectual pride, had even imbibed a little 
Cambridge caste prejudice, and, through many 
years of wild bachelor life and a close intimacy 
with the racecourse, had not grown in grace. 
He was almost a cynic; I was almost an 
idealist. He was a patriotic Irishman, with 
bitter anti-Saxon feelings. I was a patriotic 
Englishman, with the Saxon's stupid ignorance 
of Irish affairs and prejudice against Irish 
people. He was superficially anti-democratic. 
I was a democrat by nature and reflection. 
.... And, really, I believe we did each other 
good. ' The Bounder ' made me a Home 
Ruler, and taught me patience, good-humour, 
and a wider human charity. I converted him 
to Socialism, put him in the way of becoming 
an ardent and uncompromising democrat, 
revived his fainting faith in men, and 
gradually drew him into a cause and a work 
that brought out the best of his native good- 
ness." 

Two big-souled men thus "struck the 
bargain." 

Personally, I never feel that Fay is quite 
dead. He talks to me and laughs at me with 
the mouth of my friend. 



Chap. IX. Success & 

Socialism 



TOWARDS the end of 1886 the Sunday 
Chronicle in Manchester was started. 
Some of the proprietors of Bell's Life 
were interested in this new venture, and 
" R. B." was put to write its " leaders." 

He remained in the South of England for 
a while. In 1887, bad times arrived for him 
and Mrs. Blatchford. They lost two children, 
and nearly lost Winnie. They moved to the 
Isle of Wight for a few months in search of 
rest, and change, and healing; but after a brief 
stay, and in response to urgent calls, they 
packed up once again and trekked to Man* 
Chester. 

Here " R. B." was able to resume intimate 
relations with his old friend A. M. Thompson, 
while at the same time he was not wholly cut 
off from Fay; for that rare gentleman was 
appointed London correspondent to the 
Chronicle and often came to Manchester. 

"R. B.'s" work in Manchester met with 
much success and appreciation. He says that 
he does not know why. But we know why, of 



86 Robert Elatchford 

course. It was honest, first-hand work, 
observed from life and not from grammar- 
books. It was humorous, vivid, human. These 
things were obvious to all; but the lettered 
reader was able to observe a finer, more elusive 
merit in " R. B.'s " work; he perceived that 
" R. B." was master of a singularly simple style 
or manner in writing. He knew that the 
straight, clean, logical Saxon in which this 
new-comer expressed his ideas or impressions 
was rare and wonderful. 

It was a series of sketches called " The 
Chronicles of the Drum " which first brought 
" R. B." into prominence These were followed 
by other tales and devices, many of which are 
to be found in Fantasias " R. B.'s" first 
published book ; a book of fine poetry. A little 
later " R. B." added to his fame by "doing" 
the Manchester slums. Those who know and 
appreciate his later writings and who are con- 
scious of his fine and genuine passion for 
justice and his love for dirty and cold and 
hungry people can imagine with what white 
heat he threw himself into the task of exposing 
the Manchester tribe of rack-renters. One can 
imagine also, as the Vice-Chancellor of Oxford 
would remark, that he made things hum. He 
was merely a "Radical" by expressed con- 
viction even in those eye-opening days; and in 
1889 ne went to Ireland and wrote articles on 
the conventional Home Rule ticket. But a 



Success and Socialism 87 

little later in 1889 the inevitable occurred: 
he became a Socialist. 

In a brief memoir contributed to Justice 
some few years ago, " R. B." explained just 
how he became a Socialist. It is a simple ex- 
planation. 

". . . . Socialists are born as well as made," 
he says. " I was born with a nature which was 
certain to get me into some kind of mischief 
sooner or later. I have had, from my earliest 
recollection, a keen sympathy for all kinds of 
'bottom dogs/ and a rather pugnacious resent- 
ment against all kinds of bullies. I learnt the 
meaning of poverty in a lean and sharp school, 
and the blessings and indignities of labour 
were made manifest to me at an early age. 

" Then, again, my natural bent was inten- 
sified by the literature I so freely indulged in 
the books of Dickens, Ruskin, Thackeray, 
Carlyle, Emerson, Whitman, Thoreau, and 
other such plain-spoken authors were not 
calculated to check my progress towards 
democracy. 

" Indeed, I was a thorough democrat and an 
out-and-out Radical before I was out of my 
teens, and when I joined the Sunday Chronicle 
I was something more than a Radical, for 
having perceived that competition was a failure, 
and being convinced that the doctrines of the 
Manchester school were hopeless, I had, with 
considerable labour, devised an economic 



Robert 'Btatchford 

scheme of my own, somewhat resembling the 
single-tax by virtue of which the unequal and 
unjust distribution of wealth could be periodi- 
cally rectified. The details of the scheme have 
long since passed out of my mind. 

"Some time in 1888 or 1889 I was writing 
upon some social question in the Chronicle when 
a Manchester workman wrote to say that the 
only remedy was Socialism. I replied by con- 
demning Socialism. Then a Liverpool work- 
man wrote to say that I evidently did not know 
what Socialism was, and that I was an ass 
for writing about things I did not under- 
stand. 

" This caused me to think about the position, 
and I readily perceived that I really did know 
nothing about Socialism, that I had written 
about it, and that I was an ass. 

" Therefore I wrote to my Liverpool friend 
and asked for some books on Socialism, at the 
same time saying that I would study the 
question, and that if Socialism seemed to be 
just and wise I would not be ashamed nor 
afraid to say so. 

ft The man I forget his name sent me a 
pamphlet by Hyndman and Morris. I read it 
I saw directly that this collectivist idea was the 
very thing I had been looking for, that it was 
juster, simpler, and more perfect than my own 
scheme, and that it was very different from 
what I had believed Socialism to be. 



Success and Socialism 89 

" Therefore I was a Socialist, and said 
so. 

"I do not know," is " R. B.'s " final reflec- 
tion, "that I have anything to add . . . . 
except that I am a Socialist still and always 
shall be, and that I cannot understand why 
other people are not Socialists also when 
Socialism is so wise, so just, and so easy to 
understand. But all progress is slow. 

" The British are a level-headed and practical 
people, but they cannot help it, and we have 
got to make the best of them, consoling our- 
selves with the reflection that as our beloved 
fellow-countrymen are too stupid to turn round 
very quickly, it is probable that if they ever 
do become Socialists they will ' stay put ' for a 
long while. " 

" R. B.'s" connection with the Sunday 
Chronicle lasted until 1891, in which year three 
important happenings befell him: (i) He 
" stood " for Parliament; (2) he wrote and 
financed a comic opera; (3) he started or 
helped to start the Clarion. 

Dealing with these events in the order 
mentioned, it may be said of the Parliamentary 
candidature (he stood for East Bradford, as 
a Socialist) that it did not succeed and did 
not matter. All that it did for " R. B." 
was to diminish his banking account and to 
instil in him a distaste for practical politics 
and practical politicians which has endured 



90 Robert 'Blatchford 

to this hour. If you mention the matter 
to him, he merely snorts and talks about 
George Hirst. To one like myself who knows 
" R. B." and has visited the House of Com- 
mons, there is much humour in the thought 
of my friend having competed for legislative 
" dignity." 

The comic opera completed the financial 
process inaugurated by the comic candidature. 
It was a good opera; everybody says so who 
ever saw it. " R. B." wrote the libretto, which 
was dainty and whimsical, and " R. B.'s " 
cousin, Mr. Clarence Corri, supplied the music. 
The playgoer, however, refused to appreciate 
this work. It " petered out/' So did " R. B.'s " 
savings. 

Then it was that pressure was applied to 
" R. B." in reference to the political colour of 
his writings. It is not necessary to record here 
the details of the dispute which ensued between 
Mr. Blatchford and the proprietor of the 
Sunday Chronicle. I will content myself with 
stating that " R. B.'s" Socialism formed the 
chief subject of contention. 

"R. B.," having squandered his savings in 
pursuit of Parliamentary and dramatic fame, 
was placed in a weak position from which to 
conduct disputes with his employer. 

He possessed on the one hand a wife and 
family and a distinguished and lucrative post, 
the revenue from which amounted to 1,000 per 



Success and Socialism 9* 

annum. On the other hand there was his 
Socialism. 

He stuck to the Socialism and threw over 
his "post." 




The "Clarion 



ENGLAND was born again, as it were, on 
December 12, 1891, upon which day 
the first number of the Clarion was 
published. 

The founders, inventors, and proprietors of 
the new paper were the following four gentle- 
men, all of whom had worked for the Sunday 
Chronicle : 

"R. B." 

A. M. THOMPSON. 

E. F. FAY. 

MONT BLONG (Montagu Blatchford). 

These four revolutionaries did not all " come 
out " together. They left their old haunts one 
by one, as occasion offered and in the above 
order. 

When it became known in Manchester that 
" R. B." had resigned his post on the Sunday 
Chronicle^ the well-wishers came round in their 
hundreds, proffering praise, and comfort, and 
advice. " R. B." was greatly cheered thereby. 
It was, indeed, the flattering whispers of the 
well-wishers which first put into his head the 
idea of starting a new and independent journal. 
The idea was received with general acclama- 



94 Robert 'Blatchford 

tion, and promises of support reached "R. B." 
and his conspirators from all quarters. 

But when the project began to take a prac- 
tical shape ; when the moment came for signing 
cheques, then the professed admirers displayed 
that caution which is so generally practised by 
such people at such moments. 

" R. B." and his fellow-adventurers per- 
ceived that this was going to be an exclusively 
self -aided enterprise. 

None of the bold quartette had any money 
to speak of. But somebody had some shares 
in something and somebody else a life in- 
surance policy, and somebody else an uncle in 
oil and tallow. So that By dint of thrift and 
prayer and fasting a capital of 400 was 
collected, and on this sum of money the paper 
was organised, advertised, and inaugurated. 
The inauguration did not take place 
under exactly cheerful conditions. In 
the first instance difficulties were encountered in 
respect of the paper supply. Capitalists looked 
askance at this queer new venture, and the 
usual trade credit was difficult to obtain. But 
at last a paper-maker was found at Blankney, 
having within his breast the tiny seed of 
love and charity. He offered to supply the 
Clarion Board with paper. Everybody was 
surprised, particularly "The Bounder," who 
promptly dubbed the paper-maker a "Breezy 
Fellow." He was ever afterwards spoken 



The "Clarion" 95 

of in the Clarion office as " the B. F. of 
Blankney." 

The justification for this epithet, however, 
became subsequently less obvious. While the 
first number of the Clarion was being printed, 
its four parents were hurriedly and excitedly 
summoned to the place of printing, where it 
was found that the printing machine had gone 
wrong by reason of certain abnormalities (china 
clay was one of them) having been introduced 
into the texture of the paper supplied by the 
gentleman at Blankney. 

As a consequence of this fact, the first 
number of the Clarion was almost wholly 
illegible. When lumps of china clay did not 
come off and stick to the cylinders, lumps of 
cylinder came off and stuck to the china clay. 
Hence the now common expression : " A patchy 
paper. " 

This was not the only disastrous incident 
which marked the birth of the Clarion. While 
the china clay and the printing press were 
worrying out their differences, a terrific rain- 
storm burst over Manchester and peeled every 
hoarding in the city. At daybreak there 
was not a single Clarion poster to be seen. 

The appearance of the new paper was there- 
fore kept a profound secret from the public. 
And those members of the public who could 
not be fooled, who guessed that the new paper 
had been published and rushed to buy it, were 



96 Robert 'Blotch ford 

foiled again ! For when they got it they 
could not read it. In these circumstances it 
must be regarded as a surprising fact that the 
first number of the Clarion was bought by 
nearly 40,000 people. 

The subsequent sales of the paper averaged 
about 34,000 copies weekly, at which figure 
they stuck for three or four years. Those were 
hard years for the plucky little band of Clarion 
writers. Years of tough work and tender pay. 
When the fortunes of the paper and of its 
devoted foster-parents were at their lowest ebb, 
a syndicate offered " R. B." 1,500 a year if 
he would leave the Clarion. " R. B. 5> declined. 
This spirit of pluck, and endurance, and 
sacrifice ran right through the regiment. Every 
man on the muster-roll lived on half rations 
for years. These hard times had passed away 
before I got to know the Clarion and the 
Clarion men. I am one of those who batten, 
as it were, upon the blood of the pioneers. 

In 1894 Mr. Blatchford engaged in his first 
real encounter with the influenza fiend. It 
nearly killed him. He did not fully recover 
for nearly two years afterwards, and he is now 
peculiarly subject to the same disease and 
surfers badly under it. " R. B." under influenza 
suggests always to my mind the simile of a 
viking with the mumps. 

In 1895 the Clarion people made a bold and, 
as it proved, a useful move; they transferred 



The "Clarion" 97 

the head offices of the paper from Manchester 
to London. This brought them into touch with 
advanced opinion in the South of England 
whilst sacrificing no portion of their following 
in the North. 

And shortly afterwards " R. B." wrote 
Merrie England, and published it as a book. 
Then the tide swung round. 

The publication of Merrie England added 
10,000 to the weekly circulation of the Clarion. 
God and My "Neighbour, published about ten 
years later, moved the circulation up another 
15,000, and during the last three years 20,000 
more copies have been added to the weekly 
sales of the paper, so that the Clarion can now 
boast of a bona-fide circulation of 83,000 
copies. Mr. Blatchford and Mr. Thompson 
must view with some pride the present sturdy 
growth of the tree which they planted so 
haphazard in such inclement weather. 

It scarcely behoves a Clarion writer to brag 
about the influence and prosperity and power of 
the journal with which he is associated. But 
I would like to point to the record of the 
Clarion Cinderella Clubs one of the many 
recreative and social enterprises which are 
carried on by Clarion readers all over the world. 
The object of the Cinderella Clubs (of which 
there are many, all affiliated to the central 
organisation) is to feed and amuse poor 
children and to provide them with toys and 

H 



98 Robert Blatchford 

boots and clothing. One club, that of Hull, 
fed and entertained in its first year 300,000 
children. It is the entertainment feature of 
these clubs which chiefly distinguishes them 
from ordinary charities of the capitalist kind. 
The children are not merely provided with 
boots and food : they are entertained petted 
and played with and made much of. It was the 
experience gained by Clarion Cinderella Club 
officials in Bradford which enabled the school 
authorities of that city to take the lead in the 
public feeding of school children. The said 
authorities have called upon the Clarion men to 
show them how. The affiliated clubs, since 
their institution, have given happiness and 
comfort to millions upon millions of poor 
children. 

It was "R. B." who thought out the 
Cinderella Club idea, and who (while still 
associated with the Sunday Chronicle] insti- 
tuted the first Cinderella Club that of Man- 
chester which has very properly continued 
its allegiance to the Chronicle. The income of 
the Chronicle Cinderella Club last year 
amounted to "2,500. 

It is certain that that which is called in the 
Office " the Merrie England boom " established 
the fortunes of the paper. Mr. Blatchford had 
written for the Clarion a series of letters 
addressed to an imaginary working man, the 
purpose of which was to present the case for 



The "Clarion" 99 

Socialism in plain language. After this series 
of articles had run its course, it occurred . to 
somebody inside the Clarion Office to make a 
book of them. Nobody had any serious 
criticism to offer respecting this proposition, 
though, at the same time, nobody expected or 
prophesied that any startling results would 
follow on the publication of the book. But 
while the Thinking Branch of the Office was 
discussing within itself whether to print 50,000 
or 100,000 copies of the book, orders came in 
for 200,000 copies, which set the Thinkers 
thinking overtime, with the result that a decision 
to "let her out " was arrived at. The little 
book was issued in various forms, at prices 
ranging from five shillings down to a penny. 
Seven hundred and fifty thousand (750,000) 
copies of the penny edition were sold at the 
first rush. Its sale in this country and America 
has since exceeded two million copies. If one 
states that this book alone has made more 
converts to English Socialism than all other 
Socialist publications combined, one is putting 
the case conservatively. Merrie England has 
been translated into the Welsh, Dutch, 
German, Swedish, French, Spanish, Hebrew, 
Danish, and Norwegian languages. And 
through this book, of course, " R. B." achieved 
an international reputation. 

It is worth while to consider now what sort 
of book this Merrie England is; why it is the 



ioo Robert Ulatchfard 

best-known and best-remembered of all 
"R. B.'s " writings; and why it has proved so 
valuable as a work of propaganda. 

The book, as I have said, is written in the 
form of letters addressed to a Mr. John Smith, 
practical working man, of Oldham. It was the 
first book by " R. B." which I ever read, and 
I do not think that any other book of his (and 
I have read them all) has so impressed me with 
its sense of logic, lucidity, and vitality 
though logic, lucidity, and vitality are the 
outstanding features of all Mr. Blatchford's 
work. 

Take the opening paragraphs of Merrie 
England : 

" Dear Mr. Smith, I am sorry to hear that 
you look upon Socialism as a base or foolish 
thing, and upon Socialists as foolish or base 
men. 

"Nevertheless, since in you lies the hope 
of the world, I shall try to change your 
opinion. 

". . . . Now, Mr. Smith, if you are really 
a man of hard, shrewd sense, we ought to get 
on very well. I am myself a plain, practical 
man. I build my beliefs upon that which I 
see and know, and I respect a ' fact ' more than 
a Lord Mayor. 

" In these letters I shall stick to hard facts 
and cold reason; and I shall appeal to that 
robust common sense and English love of fair 



The "Clarion" 101 

play for which, I understand, you are more 
famous than for your ability to see beyond the 
end of your free and independent nose at 
election times." 

What could be more irresistible than this 
'* approach " ? Nothing could be more plainly 
stated from the standpoint of Mr. Smith, or 
more quietly, honestly, and sensibly expressed 
from the standpoint of Mr. Smythe. Here we 
do, in sooth, possess a book which (putting its 
politics on one side) is calculated to appeal to 
those who do not know about the art of writing 
equally with those who do. 

What other man in England could have 
covered all the preliminaries in those few lines 
as Mr. Blatchford does ? 

Mr. G. R. S. Taylor has recently published, 
through the New Age Press, a book of very 
brilliant character-studies dealing with the 
leaders of Socialism. In the last of these 
papers Mr. Taylor considers the work of 
"R. B.,' 1 and I am going to take the liberty 
of quoting the major portion of his very 
striking essay. It seems to me that in con- 
sidering the question of Mr. Blatch ford's claim 
to public esteem, Mr. Taylor has arrived at very 
exact conclusions. If I attempted to write an 
essay on Merrie England I should say so much 
which Mr. Taylor has already said that my 
performance would read like a very stupid 
plagiarism. Furthermore, I do not possess Mr. 



102 Robert Blatchford 

Taylor's talent for saying these things so 
brightly and gracefully. 

"We have tried," says Mr. Taylor, "to weigh 
the merits and the faults of the twelve men who 
have, perhaps, the best right to be called the 
leaders of Socialism. But you cannot have an 
army of leaders. There must be someone to 
follow behind. 

" It occurred to one clear-headed man, who 
thought in short paragraphs, that it was time 
somebody set to work to create an army to go 
after the great men who were on in front. That 
man was Robert B latch ford, who can manu- 
facture Socialists more quickly than anyone 
else. Tipton, Limited, sells more packets of 
tea than any other firm ; Bever sells more soap ; 
one factory makes most boots; another most 
chairs. Mr. Blatchford and the Clarion make 
more Socialists than any rival establishment. 
When you come to think it over carefully, this 
business of making Socialists is the only real 
work to be done. Whilst those brilliant leaders 
are waving their swords and doing the heroic 
generally, Mr. Blatchford attends to business 
and makes converts. When everyone is a 
Socialist that is, when everyone is intelligent 
there will be no need for leaders. It is only 
sheep who need shepherds and dogs to herd them 
properly. Intelligent people will do what is 
right out of sheer intelligence. (There is really 
much saving of trouble by being intelligent.) 



The " Clarion " 103 

" Mr. Blatchford's great qualification for the 
post of missionary-in-chief is the fact that he 
can say in one sentence what the gentlemen 
who write for the Times and other classical 
works take half a column to put down. If the 
best literary style is the style that is clearest, 
beyond all possibility of misunderstanding its 
meaning (which is not a bad test for people 
who set out to say something), then Mr. Blatch- 
ford writes better English than any other 
master except Shakespeare and the author of 
the Bab Ballads. Whether you agree with him 
or not, you certainly cannot misunderstand him. 
He is the only man who would make a suitable 
editor for the Book of Life, wherein, we are 
given to understand, everything will be put 
down with perfect precision and with intoler- 
able clearness. One meditates on the editor of 
the Clarion sitting within the Golden Gates, 
writing up the biography of Jay Gould or the 
Duke of Slumdom, or Messrs. X., sweaters; 
probably the brief paragraphs on ordinary pro- 
fessional men and manufacturers and trades- 
men will not read more soothingly; or on the 
wage-earner who voted against the Labour 
candidate. Their doings will be put down so 
that there cannot be the slightest mistake. 
There will be nothing unkind : it will only be 
clear truth. Mr. Blatchford is never unkind to 
an opponent. Why should he be unkind? 
When he can merely tell the truth about him. 



Robert ^Blatchford 



If I were a Liberal or a Tory politician I would 
pray that Robert Blatchford might lose his 
matchless skill of telling the plain truth (so 
that it stands out like gold in the sun), and 
that he would take to writing fierce invective 
and flowing periods. 

" Mr. Blatchford wrote two books, one named 
Merrie England and the other Britain for the 
British. When he had finished them it was no 
longer possible to plead that you could not 
understand what Socialism is; for these books 
tell you so precisely and clearly that there is 
no possibility of misunderstanding. Further, 
they are so convincing that everyone who reads 
them becomes a Socialist except the mentally 
deficient. There are about a million people in 
England who would vote for a Socialist candi- 
date at the next election. There are perhaps 
five million more who have read Mr. Blatch- 
ford's writings and are not convinced. This 
fact confirms the statistical summary of 
Thomas Carlyle, who estimated the population 
of the British Isles as ' thirty millions, mostly 
fools.' This is how Mr. Blatchford states his 
aim: 'If I can make my meaning plain to 
members of Parliament, bishops, editors, and 
other half -educated persons, and to labouring 
men and women who have had but little school- 
ing, and have never been used to think or care 
about Socialism, or economics, or politics, or 
" any such dry rot "-as they would call them 



The "Clarion" 105 

if I can catch the ear of the heedless and the 
untaught, the rest of you cannot fail to follow.' 
These two books are a kind of test of sanity; 
if you cannot understand them, if you are not 
convinced by them, then you are ripe for a 
lunatic asylum.'* 



Chap. XL "Practice 
and Fellowship 



WE discussed in the last chapter certain 
aspects of Mr. Blatchford's work 
for practical Socialism. I quoted the 
entirely impartial evidence of Mr. G. R. S. 
Taylor in support of my statement that 
Merrie England alone has attracted more 
followers to the standard of English Socialism 
than all or any of the other books contained in 
the library of the London School of Economics. 
This result has been achieved by the simplicity, 
and logic, and the obvious sincerity of the 
work in question. 

But there is a side to Socialism, thank good- 
ness, which does not entirely consist of 
economics. Practical Socialism, the reality 
and importance of which cannot be too strongly 
insisted upon at election times, is, after all, but 
one aspect of Socialism. Socialism possesses 
also an idealistic or let us be frank and say 
it plainly a religious element. Indeed, one 
may with greater truth reverse the proposition 
and say that Socialism is a profound and noble 
religion possessing a definitely practical and 
economic aspect. Socialism is neither proud 



io8 Robert Watchford 

nor terrible, and yet it is the proudest, most 
terrible, most humble of all religions. It 
is proud in its standard of an absolute com- 
munal integrity; terrible in its avenging hate 
of tyranny and grocer dom; humble in its 
familiarity with babies and in its care for dirty 
people. No other religion not even 
Christianity itself has dared to stoop so low 
as Socialism; has dared, like Socialism, to 
preach sermons upon pinafores and boots. 
And no other religion has dared, like 
Socialism, to argue with police-inspectors and 
to laugh at kings. 

This capacity for laughter is, when you come 
to think about it, the greatest and most 
wonderful thing about true Socialism ; the 
thing which distinguishes it from all other 
faiths and from a.11 mere shibboleths. The 
priests say: "Order yourself humbly and 
reverently towards your betters; be contented; 
be sober; be industrious; never hit back/' 
Socialism says : " Work, laugh, love, and 
don't forget the sparrows." 

But all this is not contained in the message 
of practical Socialism, which concerns itself 
exclusively with immediate, earthy, and 
obvious things. I say this without disparage- 
ment to practical Socialism, or to the hundreds 
of staunch spirits who are fighting the battle of 
practical Socialism. But, at the same time, it 
is well that the wider and loftier doctrines of 



Practice and Fellowship 109 

Socialism should be preached and practised. 
Who has preached them more sweetly or more 
fruitfully than " R. B." ? Who have practised 
them more freely than his followers? 

This is the remarkable fact about " R. B.'s " 
achievement. He has succeeded in capturing 
not merely the political support of his 
adherents, but their spiritual sympathy also. 
He has won men over not merely to practical 
Socialism, but to Socialism also. He has 
charmed the ears of paper merchants by the 
logic and sound business acumen of his pro- 
posals ; he has charmed the souls of poets by 
by his poetry. In order to secure this dual 
victory, Mr. Blatchford has had to perform an 
unprecedented feat of spiritual vivisection; he 
has had to divide himself into two parts 
into : (a) Robert Blatchford, the practical 
politician, simple arithmetician, and plain 
economist; (b; Nunquam, the poet, visionary 
and jolly good fellow. 

Other revolutionary writers have been con- 
tent to cut a figure in one or other of these 
capacities. " R. B." is not even content with 
playing the dual role; he has a third and even 
more popular personality that of pater- 
familias and domestic sage. And he paints 
pictures sea-scapes, by which he sets no store, 
but which have at least the merit, rare in these 
impressionist days, of not being painted brown! 

There have been practical Socialists before 



no Robert Watch ford 

"R. B." There was Karl Marx, the father of 
practical Socialism, and the author of works 
more often quoted and less often read than any 
other works on practical Socialism which have 
ever been produced. Marx, I am sure, was a 
far sounder economist than " R. B.," and 
theoretically, I daresay, more awfully destruc- 
tive. But Mr. Blatchford has succeeded in 
making himself more generally understood. 
The feeling of the two million working men 
who have read Merrie England is that Marx is 
good to venerate and Blatchford good to quote. 

There have been visionary Socialists, revolu- 
tionary poets, before " R. B." There was 
William Morris. He was a greater poet than 
Mr. Blatchford who, technically speaking, 
has never set up for a poet at all and he 
dreamed dreams which " R. B.," or any other 
man, can never surpass in splendour. But 
Morris was a literary exquisite. His appeal, 
in any true sense, was only to the few the 
comparative few. " R. B." has put poetry and 
desire into the souls of thousands upon 
thousands of working people. 

It would be easy to cut a long story short 
by saying : " Mr. Blatchford has interpreted 
Marx and Morris to the million." But this 
would be to speak that which is untrue. Blatch- 
ford has interpreted Blatchford to the million. 
His view of Socialism, it is true of Socialism 
in the broad is largely Morris's view of 



Practice and Fellowship in 

Socialism. But all people who are sane and 
love flowers take that view. As for the Marx 
tradition well : I may be telling State secrets 
I may even be telling fibs but I believe it 
to be a fact that " R. B." has not read Das 
Kapitaly either in German or in any of the un- 
known tongues into which it has been trans- 
lated. 

" R. B." has read what he pleased about 
Socialism and thought what he pleased. He 
has written books of practical logic and he has 
written books of poetry and love and laughter. 
He has persuaded working men to think, and 
he has taught them to feel. He has manufac- 
tured thousands of hard-headed, clear-cut, 
class-conscious electors, and he has manufac- 
tured the Clarion Fellowship. 

What is the Clarion Fellowship ? It is an 
unorganised body, or disembodied organisa- 
tion of persons and people who read the 
Clarion^ and live or die at its bidding. 
(Strangers please note : This is metaphor.) I 
experience a difficulty in trying to explain the 
Clarion Fellowship by reason of the fact that it 
is a thing essentially, and of its nature, in- 
explicable. We know the rules and processes 
which entitle one to membership of the Fellow- 
ship (which has no membership), but we do not 
know and cannot explain how the conditions, 
such as they are, antecedent to these rules, ever 
come to be fulfilled. The conditions, rules, 



Robert 'Blatchford 



and processes are as follows : You read the 
Clarion. That is all. That seems simple. But 
why do you read the Clarion? It is an absurd 
paper, absurdly edited. Nobody writes for it 
except at the last minute, and nobody ever 
writes what he meant to write a minute before 
he sat down to write. And nobody agrees with 
anybody else, and seldom with himself. And 
nobody has read Karl Marx. But more than 
eighty thousand practical Socialists buy this 
paper every week and read it every word and 
like each other just for reading it, and help 
each other just for reading it, and marry 
each other just for reading it. And buy their 
boots, and bicycles, and soap, and 'cyclopae- 
dias exclusively from those makers who are of 
the Fellowship, having joined it (by advertis- 
ing in the Clarion) from purely altruistic 
motives. 

Such is the Fellowship. I hope I have ex- 
plained it. I am the first person who has ever 
properly explained it. 

The Clarion Fellowship is absurd and in- 
explicable, and wholly charming. It is 
Socialism real Socialism this bond of 
genuine sympathy and kindness which exists 
between the readers of the paper which Mr. 
Blatchford edits. A stranger entering almost 
any town in England has but to proclaim him- 
self a Clarion reader (" Clarionette " is the 
popular phrase) to be assured of welcome and 



Practice and Fellowship "3 

hospitality in the houses of friends whom he 
has never seen before. This is not practical ; 
but it is Socialism. 

There is obviously but one sane and certain 
method of promoting Socialism, and that is to 
promote the circulation of the Clarion. If Mr. 
Blatchford will only accede to our impor- 
tunities and consent to live for another hundred 
years, there will not be any need for a " move- 
ment." We shall all have moved. 

How has " R. B." managed to instil this 
spirit of brotherhood into the practical converts 
to his practical Socialism ? Primarily, because 
he is a brother himself and cannot help showing 
it, and that sort of thing is catching; secondly, 
because he has balanced his "practical " books 
and articles by a number of very unpractical, 
human, jolly books and articles. 




. ^4s Novelist 



cc y^ -r-% "HAS to his credit a list of twenty 

1^ j books, nearly all of which have 

been republished from the 

Clarion. These books may be classified as 

follows : 

PRACTICAL SOCIALISM. 

(1) Merrie England. 

(2) Britain for the British. 

ETHICS AND IDEALISM. 

(3) God and My Neighbour. 

(4) Not Guilty. 

(5) Dismal England. 

STORIES AND TALES. 

(6) The Sorcery Shop. r 

(7) Tommy Atkins. 

(8) A Son of the Forge. 

(9) Tales for the Marines. 

(10) A Bohemian Girl. 

(11) Pink Diamonds. 

(12) Julie. 

BELLES LETTRES. 

(13) The Bounder. 

(14) My Favourite Books. 

(15) A Book Abotit Books. 

(16) The Nunquam Papers. 



Robert Watch ford 



(17) Fantasias. 

(18) Impressions. 

j (19) The Dolly Ballads. 

DRAMA. 

(20) The Mingled Yam. 

I propose in the next and succeeding chapters 
to consider some of these books, both from 
the standpoint of intrinsic merit and in respect 
to their influence upon that true spirit of 
Socialism which flourishes so bravely amongst 
Clarion readers. 

Those of Mr. Blatchford's stories which 
relate to soldiers and army life are, I think, 
incontestably the best which he has written. 
His other works of fiction are full of good 
things, of fine literary feeling, and genuine 
sense of character, but he writes of soldiers 
with a firmer, more convincing touch. A 
Bohemian Girl is, I think, out and away the 
best of Mr. Blatchford's general novels if 
novel it can be called, being rather a loosely- 
strung series of sketches and incidents 
surrounding the personality of a jolly girl. A 
volume full of prettiness and nonsense, and 
containing, incidentally, a very taking lyric 
relating to the subject of grey eyes. But 
(there is a "but 1 ' in my mind where all the 
non-military novels of " R. B." are concerned) 
I am pained about Miss Calliope Calliper. I 
think that we are expected to laugh at her, and 



As Novelist 117 



I cannot laugh at her. She strikes me as being 
so perfectly sane and just. 

The least successful of all Mr. Blatchford's 
novels is, I think, The Sorcery Sho-p. No man 
has yet succeeded in inventing a satisfactory 
Utopia, and Mr. Blatchford, perhaps, has come 
as near to doing so as anybody else. But 
John's Utopia never fits Jim. Mr. Blatchford, 
in this picture of the Ideal State, has seen fit 
to deprive us of our wine and tobacco. Mr. 
Blatchford expects too much from his fellow- 
man especially from his fellow-craftsman 
when he asks him to consider seriously ideals 
which eliminate wine and tobacco. 

Pink Diamonds is a most attractive book; 
but I think that only persons with a specialist 
interest in literature can appreciate it at its true 
worth. Mr. Blatchford tells me that it was 
written for the Clarion "as a joke.'* It trans- 
formed itself somehow into a literary tour de 
force; a perfect imitation of Dumas, half 
respectful, half mocking in tone, and wholly 
charming. 

The list of Mr. Blatchford's general novels 
as distinct, that is to say, from his military 
romances and tales is completed by Julie 
The Story of a Girl. This is in many ways a 
convincing and effective book; it contains one 
character Chigwin, the labour agitator the 
presentation of which is a fine piece of cynical 
realism. It contains bits and passages; whole 



n8 Robert 'Blatchford 

pages, indeed, of tenderness, and prettiness, 
and humour. But in so far as it is a 
study of a slum child and of slum people, it 
loses a certain degree of vitality by approach- 
ing its subject from a rather sentimental stand- 
point. 

Mr. Blatchford is, of course, an open and 
unashamed sentimentalist. It is this character- 
istic which constitutes his greatest charm in the 
eyes of all classes of his admirers. Admitting 
this fact it may, therefore, seem a little strange 
that one should blame a sentimentalist a pro- 
fessed, deliberate sentimentalist for writing 
sentiment. Well, I am not blaming Mr. 
Blatchford for anything he has taught me to 
recognise the futility of blame; but I say that 
in Julie Mr. Blatchford has given one reader, 
at least, rather too much sentiment. It is not a 
serious charge, even if proven. Dickens occa- 
sionally gave us too much sentiment, whilst 
Thackeray, even more often, gave us more than 
we wanted of the opposite thing. In this 
respect, however, Mr. Blatchford's work affords 
a curious contrast. The strain of sentimenta- 
lity which, as I think, appears too conspicu- 
ously in Julie and in some of his shorter stories 
of a like character, is altogether absent from 
his military novels. 

Now, I can't help thinking that the reason 
why the soldier stories strike me as being more 
true and natural and as being upon an alto- 



As Novelist 119 



gether higher plane of art than those of 
" R. B.'s " inventions which are more general in 
theme is that Mr. Blatchford, from the very 
nature of his own experience, has taken his 
soldiers at first hand. Whereas Julie, and Mr. 
Jorkle, and Daisy Spanker wear somewhat the 
air of having been copied from traditional 
models. Mr. Jorkle, the financier, who is " quite 
out of his element," and steals away, when 
other gentlemen (not financiers) talk about the 
fragrance of a woman's skin, is a weird and 
impossible monstrosity who could only have 
been conjured up by a high-minded philosopher 
who does not know financiers. Now, I could 
tell some stories about financiers which. . . 
But, then, " R. B." would blush. 

We are indebted (I think) to Sir A. W. 
Pinero for the definition of a financier as "A 
pawnbroker with imagination'' 

Accuracy of observation is a trait of art 
which does not often exhibit itself in English 
fiction. Nine English novelists out of ten (in- 
cluding those whose books are most successful 
in the commercial sense) build up their 
characters upon accepted lines. English novels 
are full of "shrewd lawyers," "sour 
spinsters/' "stern and bluff old warriors'* 
(watch them crawling up Pall Mall), titled, 
high-minded hospital nurses (who never served 
a gross novitiate as ward maids), "jolly 
sailors," and "honest farmers." If "R. B.," 



120 Robert JMatchford 

whose boundless literary activity has touched 
almost every branch of his calling, has been 
content to take it easy sometimes and to 
work occasionally from lay figures, he has 
an excuse which his purely professional rivals 
cannot offer the excuse of the extreme 
urgency and multiplicity in his affairs. 

Also, "R. B." has written soldier stories. 

The "Black M.P.'s," and Sergeant Bonass, 
and the Scrumptious Girl they are real and 
true, beyond all shadow of doubt or criticism. 

Those who would read a very just and 
finely-tempered eulogy of "R. B.'s " work in 
his capacity as a soldier-novelist will be 
privileged to do so in the next chapter, wherein 
I reproduce some quotations from two essays 
by Mr. A. M. Thompson. 

In the meantime, I will ask you to examine 
this account, as offered by Private Stumpit, of 
a curious game which was played for a wager 
between an Indian rajah and the officers of an 
English regiment. 

Private Stum-pit. Where for they played 'igh 
an* they played low, an' they played 'ell gener- 
ally; but the rajah 'e always seemed bored, an' 
the 'igher the stakes the boreder 'e got, until at 
last 'e ups an' says as European games were too 
slow, an' 'e'd be glad if the officers would pass 
their words for to take 'im on at a country 
game, for a stake worth 'avin. . . . 

So, to make a long story short, the 



As Novelist 121 



game was to set an English soldier on 
sentry in the coort-yard o' the rajah's pallis, 
the rajah an* the colonel seein' fair through 
keyholes, an* then to send in a pretty girl to 
coax the soldier's musket off him. The gel to 
use no weepons, nor drugs ; nothin' but female 
bedevilments, fair an* square. An* if the gel 
got the arms off him within the hour, the man 
was forfeit; but if not, the colonel took the 
gel. Of course, the sentry was to know 
nothin' of the game, much less as 'is com- 
mandin' officer's eye was on 'im : so that 'e'd 
nothin' to stand on but 'is soldierin'. Boots! 

CHORUS: Sfurs! 

Stum-pit. Well, when old Strapper an' the 
officers tumbled to the game, they looked 
seven ways at once, for they knew the Old 
Scuts pretty well, an' devil a man of 'em was 
fit to stand his corner. But at last they picked 
out a raw-boned, hard-faced, canny Scotch- 
man, named Angus M'Allister ; an' they put 
up a prayer, an' sent 'im into action. Boots! 

CHORUS : Spurs! 

Stum-pit. Angus was posted at twelve mid- 
night, an' there was the colonel an' the rajah, 
with their eyes glued to a brace o' keyholes; 
an' there was Angus p'radin' up an* down, an' 
never a move out of the enemy till the ghurry 
struck the half-hour. Boots! 

CHORUS: Spurs! 

Stumpit. Soon as the ghurry struck the 



122 Robert Elatchford 

half -hour, the curtains opens, an* out conies 
that Scrumshus Gel! . . . 

She 'ad an 'ed of 'air like a mer- 
maid; long an' black an' curly. She 'ad flesh 
like strawberries an' cream, eyes like flash- 
lights, a figure like a hangel, and a mouth 
like a cut cherry. ... 

She stood still long enough to let the sigh 
melt away as a sportsman does the smoke of 
'is rifle an' then she come forard, movin* as 
if she'd been steppin' to a slow waltz; an' 'er 
splendiferous eyes on Scotty's face, an' 'er 
whole self seemin' to shine an' ripple all over, 
as a graylin' does swimmin' slow up stream; 
an* at last she halts, right opposite to him 
where 'e'd stood like a moonstruck Lascar, an' 
there she stops with 'er arms 'anging down, 
an' 'er long eyelashes a-lyin' on 'er cheeks like 
black silk fringe on a peach; an* 'er breast 
heaves, same as two little smooth waves a-risin' 
outer deep water when the sea's calm, an' she 
gives another sigh. Angus said one o' them 
sighs an' a slice o' brown bread would feed a 
soldier for a day. . . 

Now, observe what Angus says : " One o' 
them sighs an' a slice o' brown bread would 
feed a soldier for a day." 

The poetic realism of that playful passage 
lives in the memory. Mr. Blatchford's soldier 
stories are crowded with such touches. For 
what happens to Angus and to Angus's 



As Novelist 123 



numerous successors I must refer the reader to 
the original story (which is that of "The 
Scrumptious Girl "). There he will read how 
the honour of the regiment is ultimately saved 
by Kate O' Flaherty, who is prevailed upon to 
" ambush 'er charms in the uniform of the 
Scuts/' and to perform sentry-go. I do not 
think that a more delightful piece of comedy 
has been written in our time than the account 
of the interview between the Scrumptious Girl 
and "Private" Kate O'Flaherty. But I do 
not propose to reproduce that passage here. I 
have already quoted enough, I hope, to 
suggest the rare, vintage flavour of the story. 
It appears with many others in a volume called 
Tales for the Marines. 

" 'Tis a good lie, Peter," says Corporal 
Ryan, " an* wan that improves wid the tellinV 

The same volume contains a fine story called 
"The Mousetrap." It is a grim story written 
in a vein of terrible reality which Mr. Blatch- 
f ord does not o f ten adopt. 

Tommy Atkins is a continuous novel of 
Army life, and it introduces many of the 
scenes and characters which appear in these 
short stories. It is a good book, but surfers 
by comparison with A Son of the Forge. Let 
us proceed to discuss that interesting and, in 
some respects, curious, work. 



Chap. XIII "A Son of 

the Forged 



THE book whose title heads this chapter 
is perhaps the most interesting of all 
Mr. Blatchford's novels. 

Its interest consists not merely in its own 
intrinsic excellence, but in the fact, which has 
been readily perceived by Mr. Blatchford's 
public, that it is, in several important respects, 
an autobiography. It is "R. B.'s" David 
Copper-field. 

It is also a rather queer book a mixture of 
genuine art and obvious journalism; of pas- 
sionate rapture and slap-dash impressionism; of 
careful and conscientious craftsmanship and 
careless scribbling. 

"It is a very fine book," says Mr. Thompson, 
but ". . . . Had he bestowed upon it even 
a small fraction of the characterisation so 
extravagantly lavished upon his military 
sketches in Tommy Atkins and Tales for the 
Marines, it might have been a popular, and 
possibly a famous, book." 

Mr. Thompson, referring to " R. B.'s " state- 
ment that A Son of the Forge was not designed 



126 Robert 'Blatchford 

as a novel, but only became one by accident, 
has described the process by which it hap- 
pened : With a view to variety of contents in 
the Clarion^ the author had set himself to 
expand into two columns an early tale, 
entitled, "No. 66," the story of a dramatic 
incident in battle, where a soldier, having 
wrested a rifle from a dead comrade's grasp 
in the fury of the fray, finds, on examining 
the weapon after the fight, that it is marked 
No. 66 the rifle number of his nearest and 
best friend ! As originally written, the story 
did not contain above 1,500 words; but find- 
ing the story unfinished at the end of his two 
columns, and being pressed by a friend to 
continue it as a serial, he went on with it week 
by week, " just splashing the colour about," he 
told Mr. Thompson, "as a kind of artistic 
showing off among friends, and by way of a 
vanity which never took itself seriously." 

A reviewer on one of the dailies told us, 
when the novel appeared, that " the conceptions 
of character resemble those of Walter Scott 
and Dickens." But Mr. Thompson points out 
as the most curious fact about the whole thing 
that, despite its undoubted success (artistically) 
as a story and as a sermon, the novel presents, 
strictly speaking, no "character" at all. 

" There is," says Mr. Thompson, " one central 
figure the Son of the Forge who tells his 
own story, and tells it in fastidiously-chosen, 






"A Son of the Forge " 127 

felicitous, and fluent literary terms which 
nowise fit his self -description as an unculti- 
vated, uncouth, and naturally sullen churl. He 
calls himself 'a savage/ 'coarse and ignorant/ 
and ' a victim of brutish slavery ' ; but when 
he goes on tramp he observes that ' the cottages 
along the highway were clean and bright, with 
flowers trained over their lattices, and pigeons 
fluttering above their thatched roofs; and in 
the trim gardens before them the broad-faced 
sunflowers and flaunting hollyhocks made a 
brave show. Better to die here of hunger/ he 
thinks, this dainty boor, ' with the scented elder 
flowers above, and the daisied grass below, 
than to live for a century of brutish slavery 
in the smoke and sulphur of the chain sheds.' 

"A passing lady gives him a lily, and the 
look which accompanies the gift makes him 
feel 'ashamed to be seen/ But a few days 
later the ' coarse and ignorant * Orson perfectly 
understands the meaning of that look, and of 
its effect upon him. 'It was the light of love 
that had shone in on my dark soul from those 
great, sweet eyes. The light of the love that is 
of no sex, no nation, and no creed, of the love 
that is Christ-like in its humanity and divinity, 
the love that hopes all, believes all, pardons all, 
and glorifies all, cries the lumpish and trucu- 
lent boor, in very unchurlish ecstasy, and 'so 
I blessed the lady of the lily, and fared on! 
The reviewer who found Blatchford's charac- 



128 Robert Elatchford 

terisation like that of Dickens evidently remem- 
bered the elder novelist's habit of making his 
'creations' talk like their author. 

" The hero's accidentalness has not only been 
very damaging to his character : it has almost 
robbed him of his good name. Two admirers 
of the book, whom I asked what the hero was 
called, scratched their heads, smiled shame- 
facedly, and confessed they could not tell. 
When I put the question to the illustrious 
author himself, he puckered his eyebrows for a 
moment, then chuckled as though he had found 
a new joke, and said : ' Blest if I know ! 
Hasn't he got a name?' The fact is that 
neglect of pre-natal preparation has left 
William Homer almost as marrowless and pale 
as David Copperneld himself; but the latter 
has a notable advantage in that his name 
appears on the cover of the book and in the 
library catalogues. 

"The persons who more or less fortuitously 
tumble into the hero's life are equally vague 
and casual. Philip Joyce, ' his friend,' as the 
old dramatists would have described him, is a 
miscellaneous sort of lovesick swain, who sud- 
denly breaks out from the author's brain like 
the beamish Distinguished Person on the 
Cinematograph, and lo, behold ! in a brace of 
filmy twitters, whiz ! he is off the screen, leaving 
no trace behind except a fidgetting impression 
of wobbliness. 






"A Son of the Forge" 129 

" Conversationally, Mr. Joyce, like Mr. Homer, 
is constituted so as in many respects to resemble 
the conceptions of character of Dickens. When 
his friend asks him what there is to live for, 
he answers : ' Why, plenty of things. Doing 
your drill, and cleaning your traps, and reading 
books, and looking at the fields and flowers, 
and laughing at people, and being sorry for 
them, and helping them, and falling out with 
them, and going to bed and getting up again, 
and eating your meals, and cursing the commis- 
sariat, and falling in love, and getting married, 
and having children, and growing old, and 
being a man, in short. That's how I look at 
it.' It is my secret belief that it was Mr. Philip 
Joyce who wrote Robert Blatchford's famous 
' Not Out, 50.' " 

So much for the "curious" side of the book. 
Now let us begin to test its actual quality. 

Philip Joyce does not make his appearance 
until the iiith page of the book, and the love 
interest, only begins at 230, while the book ends 
at page 248. 

" Yet," says Mr. Thompson, "if I were 
asked what were the dominant note of the book, 
I should answer, Love. 

" It is a tale of War and Battle," says Mr. 
Thompson, in explanation of this seeming 
paradox, " . . . . but the permeating influence 
is that of Woman, and the dominant effect is 
one of feminine tenderness ! 

K 



130 Robert Elatchford 

"That is the phenomenon which makes A Son 
of the Forge a wonderful book : the visible, 
stage-monopolising Hamlet is here the shadow, 
and the transcient Ghost behind the scenes, the 
Spirit of the Eternal Feminine, is the reality 
which gives the play all its character, colour, 
and glow. 

" Except as a reflex of feminine influences, 
the hero is nothing. In the first and finest chap- 
ters of the book he is a mere lay figure used 
for the display of Alice Homer's beautiful 
sisterly love and solicitude. Though she speaks 
only one word in the whole book, and that 
word is ' yes ' though there is no other 
description of her aspect than that she had a 
homely face, big, misshapen hands, and an 
ugly frock, the rough Rembrandtesque outline 
of Alice Homer has more flesh and blood 'to' 
it than Balzac's Nanon derives from fifty well- 
fed pages of Leonardesque detail. 

" She worked as a chainmaker, and was 
thrashed by a drunken father. When her 
brother was waled with the buckle-end of the 
father's strap, she crept upstairs to take him in 
her arms and cry over him ; ' and if she could 
find a crust of bread or a cold potato, she 
would bring it to me, pressing me to eat it, 
while she whispered such words of hope as her 
simple heart could prompt.' 

" On one occasion she took off her only petti- 
coat, and sold it to buy bread for her brother's 



"A Son of the Forge" 131 



supper. To procure him warmth she walked a 
mile in the winter night to sell a basket of 
empty whisky bottles for a piece of coal. When 
he was down with low fever, she forced her 
way into the reeking taproom where her father 
sat among other brutes, and, despite his 
ruffianism, she brought home grapes and white 
bread for her fevered and starving brother. 
' And the great God, who made the west wind 
and the briar rose, never made anything more 
worthy or more sweet than she.' The portrait 
is the perfect condensed essence of reality 
idealism achieved by a few simple strokes of 
realism." 

But here again the critic finds himself con- 
fronted by a paradox. 

" There never was a story with so strong a 
' feminine interest/ and yet there never was a 
story with so little space devoted to the frocks, 
the chatter, and the personal beauty of indivi- 
dual women." 

The truth is that, as Mr. Thompson puts it, 
the characters who speak and act the story " are 
mere shadows : they are only illumined and 
warmed into life when they come under the 
glowing, but uncertain, rays of Woman's ten- 
derness." 

The critic quotes a passage from what he 
describes as " the sunniest of all the woman 
chapters," in illustration of this quality. This 
is it a delicious morsel : 



132 Robert 'Blatchford 

Carrie came and sat on a stool at my 
feet. I began to talk business. 

" Carrie," I said, " how old are you ? " 

She smiled, and rubbed her chin with her 
thimble, thoughtfully. "About eighteen," 
she said, " I think." 

" Would you ? " said I, very diffi- 
dently. " Don't you want me to go away ? " 

" God forbid," she exclaimed, looking up 
with pained anxiety. 

" Have you no friends ? " 

" Not a soul in the world but you, 
chummie." 

"Would you like to live with me?" 

She looked at me with quiet, serious direct- 
ness, and nodded. 

" Always ? " 

" Ever and ever, amen ! " She showed her 
white teeth in a smile. She smiled as frankly 
and sweetly as a child. 

" Would you like to go to America ? " 

" With you ? " 

" Certainly." 

"Yes." 

" I'm very poor, Carrie." 

"Well?" 

" We might have hard times." 

"Of course" 

" You expect that, then. But yet you'd 
come ? " 

Carrie glanced at the bed. 






"A Son of the Forge" 133 

" Nan would go with us," I said. 

Carrie held out her hand. " It's agreed," 
she said. 

" Well, Carrie," I continued, " you are 
alone, and I am alone. And you want a 
friend, and I cannot spare you. So we will 
take our chance together. If I can get the 
money, we will emigrate. If not, we will 
fight it out in England." 

Carrie nodded and smiled. "Anywhere," 
she said. " What does it matter to chums ? " 

" Then " said I, making a dash for it, 
" when shall we get married ? " 

" Married ? " 

" Yes, dear. You will marry me ? " 

" Marry ? Do you mean to many me ? 
Really ? " 

" Carrie, Carrie," I said, perfectly startled. 
" What did you think I meant ? What do 
you think I am ? " 

But Carrie did not answer my question. 
She knelt upon the floor, hid her face against 
my knee, and, gripping my hand in hers, 
began to cry. 

" Carrie ! " I said, for I was alarmed by 
this strange conduct. " What is it ? What 
do you mean ? " 

The girl clung to me, sobbing and laugh- 
ing wildly. "Marry me? Marry me? Oh, 
Willie ! Oh ! chummie ! Shall I be your 
wife ? " 



134 Robert 'Blotch ford 

I began to understand her now. I drew 
her into my arms, and kissed her. " My 
dear," I said, " you are too good for me. 
But I love you, and I will take care of you. 
Will you promise ? " 

But at that moment Nan awoke, and, start- 
ing up in bed, called out, " Carrie, what's 
the matter ? He isn't going to leave us ? 
Carrie, don't ! You frighten me." 

Poor Carrie ran to her sister, laughing and 
crying, took her in her arms, hugged her, 
kissed her, and repeated a dozen times, 
" Nan, Nan, Nannie ! We are going to 
get married. We are going to live with 
Willie. You shall be his sister, and me his 
wife." 

But although the love interest, apparently 
adventitious, dominates the whole story, there 
is more than that in the book. " R. B." never 
writes anything without betraying his hatred 
for cruelty and oppression, and Mr. Thompson 
declares that : 

" A Son of the Forge takes its place, too, 
amongst the instruments of his fierce indict- 
ment of Society. 

" With the entrance of the soldiers, the tune 
changes to a swinging martial march and a 
roar; but even in the loudest blare of the 
trumpets, the indictment of Society is not for- 
gotten. 



"A Son of the Forge " 135 



" After the miseries of the workers comes the 
exposure of the agonies of war. There is no 
special pleading, no declamation, no ' fire- 
works,' no embroidery. Precision, not preci- 
osity, is the author's aim. He tells his tale in a 
strict and succinct, but always vividly pic- 
turesque, style ; and though the narrative seems 
more like a report than a story, the under- 
lying indignation attains contagiousness which 
is often missing from the violent declamations 
of the avowed humanitarian preacher. 

" There is no sign in the book that the author 
has consciously set himself any theory to prove 
or any doctrine to preach. He is too artistic 
to be didactic. He impresses his readers with 
the absolute reality of certain characters and 
certain incidents, and, without seeming to point 
a moral, he makes his very reticence stamp it 
upon the mind with the force of a sledge- 
hammer. 

"The impact of the lesson is all the greater 
because in his wide catholicity of human 
sympathy, the author actually betrays us into 
momentary admiration of the wild-beast attri- 
butes whose survival in the civilised human 
animal continues to make war possible. 

" In one of the most marvellous pieces of 
word-painting ever accomplished his stirring 
description of the march of the Highland and 
Devonshire regiments through Portsmouth- 
he makes every nerve and muscle throb respon- 



136 Robert Watch ford 

sive to that magnetism of numbers, of sound, 
and of colour which is the mainstay of mili- 
tarism. No Jingo ever made this amazing 
thrill of elementary passions more real or more 
infectious. 

" The waiting soldiers' lust of blood, their 
delirious reception of 'the tidings of great joy' 
(that they are to go out to slash and slay, and 
be slashed and slain), the madness of their 
disappointment when they learn that the 
opportunity of killing is postponed all these 
incredible brutalities and ferocities of the 
trained fighting animal Blatchford makes for 
the moment comprehensible, and almost sym- 
pathetic, to all. The reason is that he knows 
the feeling which he so convincingly describes. 
He has told us, in his articles on " Heredity " 
in the Clarion : 

" When I went soldiering, and got out into 
the skirmishing line at a field day, and when 
the smell of the powder was acrid in the air, 
and the rattle of musketry drummed on the 
brain, and the men got excited and ran and 
cheered, I was startled to find a grim change 
in rny nature. I felt like a prowling savage. 
A strong instinct took hold of me: the 
instinct to hide, to crouch, to steal forward 
stealthily, and to shoot straight, and with 
deadly intent. I did not like this feeling, 
and could not account for it. But I suppose 






"A Son of the Forge" 13? 

I got it where I got my back hair : from 
India. Or maybe it was the genius of the 
Dutch Boer. 

" That is the reason which makes the war 
fever and the blood lust so real a thing in 
A Son of the Forge. Blatchford has felt 
them himself. He has the memory of, and 
sympathy for, them. Under the influence of that 
exaltation, he himself becomes, despite his 
almost feminine tenderness, a fighter eager for 
the cut and thrust and drunkenness of battle. 

"But, like his hero, he soon becomes 'ashamed 
of it/ and then proceeds with his right business 
of exposing the emptiness, the fraud, and the 
horror of war. After tricking us into under- 
standing Philip drunk, he opens our eyes wide 
to the awful sadness of Philip's return to 
sobriety. No writer who had not sympathised 
with the first feeling could have so stirred 
us with the horror of the reality. The 
mere preacher, the doctrinaire, the deliberate 
denouncer, could never have got the effect. We 
should have ' seen him coming.' But Blatchford 
makes us partakers of the intoxication that we 
may ' feel ' for ourselves the humiliation and 
sickness and pain of the recovery. 

" He does not give us much breathing-time 
between the debauch and the beginning of the 
cure. Nor does he spare any ignoble details. 
First, the agony of the women and children. 



138 Robert 'Blotch ford 

The physical ' seediness ' of his pot-valiant 
brawlers the morning after the truculent orgie. 
Still more grimly sardonic though he writes 
it with his usual compassion the chapter of 
seasickness, where the heroes are represented 
lying ' in heaps upon the bare boards, grovel- 
ling and helpless, the sailors striding over 
them, stepping on them, kicking them, and 
cursing them for lubbery swabs and land crabs, 
and the vessel all the while rolling and pitch- 
ing horribly/ What an awakening ! what a 
disillusion ! what a satire ! This contrasting 
of nauseous impotence with bellicose vainglory 
was a masterstroke. 

" It is more effective than the picture of the 
heap of amputated legs and arms in Erckmann- 
Chatrian, or Zola's gruesome picture of the 
wounded at Sedan lying face downwards in 
pools of their own blood." 



Chap. XIV. Chapter 

and Verse 



Eus now direct our attention to that 
section of Mr. Blatchford's writings 
upon which (as I think) rests most 
securely his claim to be regarded as a great 
craftsman. I refer to the series of books which 
I have grouped under the heading of Belles 
Lettres. 

During his Sunday Chronicle days, Mr. 
B latch ford was seized with an ambition to 
" improve his shorthand." The method which 
he adopted may not be original, but it was 
carried out with a thoroughness probably un- 
paralleled. 

For two solid years he devoted all his spare 
time to reading and re-reading the following 
books : Job, Isaiah, The Psalms, The Song 
of Solomon, Pilgrim' s Progress, and White's 
Selborne. Line upon line, page after page, he 
searched these books for rare, or archaic, or 
beautiful words. These he wrote down upon 
slips of paper, and against each word he wrote 
its synonym or synonyms. Also the short- 
hand forms of both word and synonym. 
These shorthand "outlines" he subsequently 



140 Robert 'Blatchford 

compared with the shorthand dictionary. The 
primary object of all this was, as I have said, 
to improve his shorthand. Mr. Blatchford 
has no doubt that the exercises did improve his 
shorthand, which has been of little or no use 
to him since. But the exercises did more than 
this : they helped Mr. Blatchford to form and 
develop that remarkable gift for writing plain 
English, which is not only the most remark- 
able of all his gifts, but is a gift so remarkable 
in itself as to mark out its possessor from 
among all other modern writers. I can justify 
this statement by quotation and example. Be 
so kind, please, as to examine the following 
specimen of prose : 

" This fitful fever, this yoke-bearing 
drudgery under goad which all of us endure 
we call it real life. We think of it as 
actuality ! As fact ! As the practical and 
true. Sweating under our burdens, writhing 
under our affliction, we struggle on ; but we 
don't like it. The demons of pride, hate, 
greed, ambition, shame, want, and terror pinch 
and wound and revile us in our Valley of the 
Shadow, and we stumble forward amongst the 
gins and pitfalls. But we don't enjoy it. 
Always the soul struggles in its bonds, and 
turns its eyes for ever upwards. From prince 
to pauper, from infancy to senility, we hunger 
and thirst for something better, brighter, 
purer we know not what. It would seem as 



Chapter and Verse I4 1 



though we are fallen spirits cast out from 
some higher sphere, and can never wholly 
accept or reconcile ourselves to the degrada- 
tion of this world. It would seem as if the 
old Platonic notions were right that we get 
our souls from a perfect state, and with them 
an inarticulate memory of what is true or 
false, of what is base or noble. The greatest 
sinner hates and despises sin. The biggest 
rascal knows honour to be better than villainy. 
The soul of man revolts from moral iniquity; 
his nature shudders at what is base as his body 
does in the presence of impurity. Men work 
in grime and dirt. But every man loves to 
have his body clean. They live in dull and 
sordid ways, but they never lose the yearning 
for that which is beautiful and pure. Captives 
by the waters of Babylon, we thrill with rage 
and pleasure at the sound of the songs of 
Zion. Fallen, degraded, blunted, and given 
over to the service of Baal we may be; but if 
amid the din and clatter of the devil's work- 
shop one true note is sounded, our besotted 
memory stirs itself our dull wits wake to 
listen." 

Fantasias the book is called from which I 
take this cutting. I am not asking you to 
appraise the philosophy which it preaches. I 
allow people not to argue about philosophy. 
I am asking you to view the extract merely as 
a specimen of prose writing. Is it not splendid 



142 Robert Watchford 



writing ? Does it not thrill you ? Does it not 
sing to you ? And yet observe how simple are 
the words and thoughts which compose it. 

This book, Fantasias, is out of print, by 
the way. The writer of these lines only suc- 
ceeded in getting hold of a copy a few hours 
before the lines were written. He has read it 
through with delight and amazement, for it 
contains a varied assortment of the very best 
of Mr. Blatchford's imaginative writings. The 
book must certainly be reprinted. 

Amongst the pieces contained in Fantasias 
there is a character sketch of a wild-beast 
soldier, who belonged to " R. B/s " regiment. 
It is a terrible little story, related with terrible 
effect. I desire to direct the particular notice 
of the reader to this story, because it again 
offers testimony to Mr. Blatchford's remarkable 
versatility a versatility which on this occasion 
he displays not so much in his subject as in 
his treatment of that subject. Mr. Blatchford 
is not, by habit, a " realistic " writer that is to 
say, his literary tendency is to make the best 
of things, whether good or bad : to represent 
both goodness and badness with just that touch 
of exaggeration which moves the reader to 
emotion. What is called the " nervous 
restraint" of the modern school (a trick or 
manner of literary expression borrowed from 
France) is not much in " R. B.'s " line. And 
yet when he chooses as the particular sketch 



Chapter and Verse 143 






to which I refer makes evident, our war-worn 
veteran can perform grim realistics with any 
of the youngest and most nervous of his con- 
temporaries. Let me quote an illustrative 
passage : 

"That night Buffalo got out of bed after 
tattoo, climbed the down-spout of the officers' 
messhouse, walked along the eave spout to the 
barrack wall, dropped twenty feet into the 
field, went to the nearest tavern and bought a 
bottle of rum, forced a window of the artillery 
stables, wrenched off the lock of the hatch 
door, dodged the artillery sentry, and got 
back to bed. Here he drank up all the rum, 
and then disturbed the room by yelling his 
favourite ditty : 

Drunk and sober again, 

Sober and drunk again ; 
Oh, if I do live to get drunk, 

I shall live to get sober again. 

" Pat Daley then rose up in bed and threw 
a canteen at Buffalo in the darkness. It 
caught him on the nose, but made no mark. 
Buffalo hurled the rum-bottle at random. The 
sergeant got up and ordered Buffalo to the 
guardroom. 

" This was too much. Buffalo went to 
prison for forty-two days. 

" He returned but little changed, except that 
having his hair and moustache close cropped 



144 Robert 'Blatchford 

made him look, if possible, more base and 
villainous than ever. He was still sullen, still 
silent, and drank with the steady perseverance 
of a man to whom stomach and conscience are 
words without meaning. 

" s You were the worse for liquor at drill 
this afternoon/ said the drill-corporal. 'Don't 
turn out like that again. You've had rough 
times, but I'll have to run you in if you don't 
keep sober.' 

"Buffalo said 'All right,' and went to the 
canteen and drank till he could hardly see. 

" ' Where's the colonel gone to ? ' asked 
Buffalo of his cot-mate. 

"'Gone on leave,' said Jack Smith; 'back 
next Monday,' and he went on reading. None 
of the men would waste words on Buffalo. 

" Buffalo said no more. He went to his 
cot and sat down. He had in his valise a new 
Belgian revolver and fifty cartridges. He had 
bought them since he returned to the regiment. 
He kept his own counsel, though he drank 
harder than ever. The colonel would be back 
on Monday. Then something was going to 
happen. 

" But something happened on Sunday night. 
A new recruit had joined while Buffalo was at 
Millbank. His name was Evan Evans ; and he 
came from the Rhondda Valley. On the 
Sunday night he strolled into F Company, 
and saw Buffalo Adams sitting on his cot, 



Chapter and Verse H5 

smoking a filthy black pipe. As he came in, 
Adams laid down the pipe, and rose up, his 
small grey eyes almost starting out of his 
head. Evans stopped half-way down the 
room. He put his arms akimbo, and looked at 
Adams in astonishment. The other men 
noticed this, and gave their attention to the 
two Welshmen. Adams spoke first He 
said : 

' You black beast. What are you doin' 
here?'" 

Any writer who has ever tried to tell a story 
will appreciate the art of that passage, with 
its grim and deadly geniality, its deliberate 
and calculated reticence. 

This same remarkable little volume of 
Fantasias contains a poem a sort of nursery 
rhyme called " The Three Baby Buntings." 

This again enables me to offer evidence of 
Mr. Blatchford's really astounding versatility. 
Here are three verses : 



There were three baby buntings, 

And a rambling they did go ; 
They toddled and they waddled, 

And they tumbled down also, 

Look ye there ! 
They toddled and they waddled, 

And the first thing caught their een 
Was a bonny yellow butterfly 

That fluttered o'er the green. 
Bert said it was a butterfly, 

But Jennie she said " Nay, 
L 



146 Robert 'Blatchford 

It's just a pansy flower that's spread 
Its wings and flown away," 
Look ye there ! 

They rattled and they prattled 

Till they heard a merry sound 
Like the chirping of a grasshopper 

From out the daisied ground, 

Look ye there ! 
Dick said it was a grasshopper, 

But Jennie laughed so blithe, 
And said a fairy mower was 

A-whetting of his scythe, 
Look ye there ! 

They toddled and they waddled, 

And the next thing they did find 
Was a bed of dainty jonquils, 

And that they left behind, 

Look ye there ! 
Dick said they were sweet Nancies, 

But Jennie said she thought 
They were little baby sisters which 

The doctor hadn't brought, 
Look ye there ! 

There are more verses of similar grace and 
prettiness which I have not room to quote; but 
here is the ninth and last verse : 

She took them in and washed them 

Cleaner than a silver pin, 
And then she told their dada 

Of the mischief they'd been in, 

Look ye there ! 
She called them naughty children, but 

Their dada answered, " Nay, 
Pinafores were made to wash, my lass, 
And lambs were made to play." 
Look ye there ! 



Chapter and Verse H7 

Superior intellects will probably tell you 
that these verses are homely. But do not 
allow that epithet to spoil your dinner. This 
is a lyric poem, you see, and all lyrics worth 
talking about are homely in sentiment. 

Revolutionary ideas have been expressed in 
lyric form before to-day ; but that is a method 
of adopting means to an end which is not 
recommended by the best authorities. Messrs. 
Thrush and Blackbird are the two models 
which all good lyrists set before them; and 
judged by the standards of these eminent per- 
formers, this little song about the Baby Bunt- 
ings really seems almost to touch perfection. 
Read it over again, and then see if bits and 
snatches of it do not keep reciting themselves 
to you all day long. This is the test of a good 
lyric. I offer that information without charge. 

While we are talking about Mr. Blatchford's 
verse we may as well talk about the Dolly 
Ballads the only book consisting entirely 
of verse which " R. B." has published. 

I have a great affection for the Dolly 
Ballads. A lady, to whose children Mr. 
B latch ford sent a copy of the book when it 
was first published, two years ago, wrote him, 
in that spirit of kindly candour which highly- 
educated people sometimes exhibit, to say that 
she had taken the book away from her children 
because the verses were written in ungrammati- 
cal language. They are written in child 



148 Robert Elatchford 

language : the language of Mr. Blatchford's 
child. This is the sort of thing to which the 
lady objected : 

I wish it didn't blow, Ma, 

Acos Ps cold as lead ; 
An I wish if you would rock me 

Before I go to bed. 

If I was on your knee, Ma, 

I fink I'd be all right, 
As then I's tell a story 

What Mary telled last night. 

Onct there was upon a time, Ma 
Let me kneel up on your knees. 

How can a robin sleep, Ma, 
When the wind shakes all his trees? 

Onct there was upon a time, Ma, 

A naughty Turkiss Jew; 
An' he lived into a comtry, 

An' his whiskums all came blue. 

My Dada's face is blue, Ma, 

Acos he s'aves, you know. 
Would my Dada have blue whiskums 

If he let his whiskums grow? 

Thus Dolly goes on to tell in her own 
language and in her own way the story of 
Blue Beard. One trusts that the children of 
that austere lady whom I have mentioned will 
grow up to talk extremely careful English and 
to part their hair exactly. 

You cannot quote effectively from the Dolly 
Ballads. The verses hang so closely together 
that any individual poem would be bound to 



Chapter and Verse 149 

come badly through the ordeal of detached 
representation. One might just as sensibly cut 
one square inch out of a picture and present 
it for judgment to the discerning critic. 

This book is not exactly written for 
children : though children, I am sure, are 
bound to like it. There is no living child 
who will not listen open-mouthed, with a 
delicious mingling of horror and happiness, to 
the highly-sensational romance of the 
" Grumblin' Grisly Bear," or to the stirring 
adventures of the " Bishump and the Crocum- 
dile." But for all that, I think that I am right 
in saying that the verses were not written for 
children; for behind the mere mechanism of 
the stories which they tell there is a flavour 
a thrill which only the grown-ups will notice, 
which only the grown-ups can enjoy. What is 
the quality of this flavour ? It is anything of 
many qualities, chief among them being a sort 
of a something which I will permit myself to 
describe as child-hunger. 

Mr. Blatchford himself thus describes the 
origin of the Dolly Ballads : " I wrote those 
ballads for the pleasure of writing them. They 
are, as nearly as possible, a true report of 
certain stories told by Dolly (" R. B.'s " 
daughter) at the age of four. I have cast them 
into verses, but have kept as closely as I could 
to the actual words of the child. The sayings 
are Dolly's sayings; the language is Dolly's 



150 Robert 'Blatchford 

language; the interpolated questions and 
irrelevances are Dolly's own. I wrote the 
ballads about twelve years ago, and I cannot 
write any more unless some good friend will 
lend me a baby. Dolly has disregarded the 
advice given to her in a letter by Mark Twain, 
and has grown up." 

My own reasons for liking the Dolly 
Ballads are these : I like them because they 
are fresh and tender and whimsical, full of 
insight into the hearts of children; full of love 
for children, full of honest fun. Also (and of 
what other similar verses published within the 
last ten years can this be said ?) they are 
wholly underivative really and truly new. 

There are other stray verses scattered 
through Mr. Blatch ford's books of which I 
should like to speak. I will say my "per- 
mitted say" in the next chapter. 



Chap. X/ 7 ". More Quotes 



A CHAPTER of quotations may as well 
begin with quotations. To begin with, 
therefore, I shall quote some verses 
from Dismal England. They appear in a 
paper called Linen and Lives, and form, as it 
were, a new "Song of the Shirt" I quote at 
random : 

A woman weak with years, 
Cowed down by sickly dread, 

In the shadow of my fears 
I slave for bitter bread. 



Spin, spin, thou cruel wheel ! 

So my sick brain doth spin ; 
Stab, stab, thou leaping steel .' 

So hunger stabs within. 



"Whir, whirr," the hoarse wheel sings, 

Like man it hath no ruth; 
Sharp, sharp, the needle stings, 

Like some damned serpent's tooth. 



A woman grey with years, 
I bow my stricken head ; 

In the shadow of my fears 
I slave for bitter bread. 



152 Robert Watchford 



God knoweth what I feel, 

Though man doth nothing heed ; 
Oh ! broken on the wheel, 

Internal tears I bleed. 

Who would, these fardels bear ? 

God knoweth what I feel, 
But I've no time for prayer 

Round goes the giddy wheel. 



Swift, swift the needle flies : 
God seeth my sad heart ; 

He bends His awful eyes 
Upon the "Labour Mart." 

Some bring fair flesh for sale, 
And others bring fair fame ; 

Some cheeks with want are pale, 
And others red with shame. 



I have no time to weep, 
God knoweth what I feel ; 

I .have no time to sleep 
Round goes the giddy wheel. 

Round goes the giddy wheel, 
I lift my palsied hand ; 

God knoweth what I feel 
I curse my native land. 

My wrath is as a flame ; 

I curse this devil's mart : 
I curse this land of shame ' 

I curse it in my heart. 

Where legislators try 
The false and true to fit, 

And lie, and lie, and lie, 
And are well paid for it. 



More Quotes i53 

Where cultured rantipoles 

Of " ladies'" virtues tell, 
What time their sisters' souls 

Creep shuddering to hell. 



I curse this swinish rout 

God knoweth what I feel : 
Their sins shall find them cut 

Round goes the giddy wheel. 

I have quoted less than half of this fine 
poem, and some of its best verses I have, 
perforce, omitted. But the scope and purpose 
of it may be judged from these extracts. 

Now, I think that this is a very remarkable 
poem. Nothing more successful in the simple 
ballad form has been written in our language. 
The suggestion of bitterness and tragedy is 
conveyed with terrible power. You can find 
lapses, of course. "Internal tears" I do not 
like, nor such trite colloquialisms as " labour 
mart." But, taking the poem as a whole, and 
excluding Hood's " Song of the Shirt " (which 
must in part have suggested it), I will con- 
fidently challenge anybody to produce a plain 
ballad more absolutely effective in the sugges- 
tion of horror and want and injustice. Even 
Hood's great poem, I think, is no more than 
its equal. "Round goes the giddy wheel! " 
That recurrent phrase is introduced with fine 
restraint and effectiveness. 

Dismal England, the book in which this 



154 Robert 'Blotch ford 



ballad occurs, is a collection of sketches and 
impressions in which the note of cheerfulness 
is rather obviously subdued. It contains one 
comic sketch, however about a lion-tamer. 
"R. B." talked with the lion-tamer, who 
divulged the secrets of his craft and explained 
how extraordinarily simple it all was ! " There 
was really no danger," he said, stroking a 
lion's nose. 

"I am more sorry than I can say," states 
" R. B.," in conclusion, "to have to add a 
sad postscript to this article. 

" Our gentle lion-tamer was killed less than 
a year after our interview with him. He 
slipped in the cage, and, falling, was seized 
upon by the bears and hyenas, and so badly 
hurt that he died. 

" And another lion-tamer, with whom I had 
a talk some time afterwards, told me it was 
mainly our poor friend's own fault that he was 
killed. 'He was careless,' said the second 
tamer, ' and went into the cage with wet clay 
on his boots. That caused him to fall, and a 
blind bear, prowling round, came upon him, 
and naturally seized him in a hug. Then the 
hyenas and the wolves attacked him, and the 
man was helpless. But there is really no 
danger if you are careful '/ " 

It is a good book, this Dismal England, but 
I will restrain my passion for quotation. My 
favourite pieces in it are the sketches called 



More Quotes i55 



"A Gay Life," "The Poor in Ireland," and 
this lion-taming yarn. 

Now as to the books about books. There 
are two of them My Favourite Books, 
published in 1901, and A Book About Books, 
published two years later. 

" R. B." has publicly confessed that writing 
about books is his very favourite form of work. 
And the resulting essays read like it. They 
are the spontaneous, friendly discourses of a 
bookman. Take the article (from My 
Favourite Books} on " Bed Books : 

"If the reading of good books is ever sinful, 
it is at meal-times. He who reads at meal- 
times treats his meal and his digestion with 
discourtesy, and puts upon his author the 
affront of a divided allegiance. But to read 
in bed ! That is a good man's virtue, the 
innocent indulgence of the well-deserving. 
Therefore gossip about bed books will ever 
be acceptable to the just. And the wise man 
will show a nice discrimination in the choice 
of his literary nightcap. It is a case of means 
and ends. A man might write about bed 
books until he sent his readers to sleep, yet 
would get no ' forrader ' unless he followed 
some logical plan. 

" Do you want to go to sleep or to keep 
awake ? That is the question. Are you a 
reader, or only one who reads ? Do you love 
books, or would you e'en be snoring ? 



156 Robert 'Blatchford 

" A gentleman, look you, would fain go to 
sleep like a gentleman. That is leisurely, 
kindly, with a grateful smile to Goodman 
Day, his host that is, and a graceful greeting 
to Mistress Night, his hostess that is to be. 
None but a boor would turn his back upon the 
sun in churlish haste, and jump into the arms 
of Morpheus neck and crop, like a seal rolling 
off an ice-floe. Therefore, a gentleman reads 
before he goes to sleep. 

" The ideal bed book should be small, 
printed in good type, not too boisterous, not 
too sad ; an old friend. Then, with a mild, 
clear light, a pipe, and something in a tumbler, 
a man may court happiness and win her; and 
the malice of the gods and follies of the flesh 
shall fret his soul no more. 

" The best bed book I know is Spenser's 
poems. That is a book you cannot fully 
appreciate in the workaday hours. Only in the 
silence of the night can one hear the murmur 
of its song, like the regular irregularity, the 
ordered wildness, and charming cadence of a 
brook." After which, " R. B. " quotes some lines 
from the Prothalamian to uphold his claim for 
Spenser. 

It is remarkable, when you consider the 
facts of Mr. Blatchford's life and training, 
how strongly the Greeks and Latins are repre- 
sented in the counsels of his book-room. 

I have said elsewhere that " R. B.'s " real 



More Quotes 157 

interest in books began when he left the Army 
and got hold of Carlyle. He followed up 
Carlyle with Emerson, Sterne, and Rabelais. 

When he was about thirty he met with Sir 
Thomas Browne, Morte d* Arthur, Keats, 
Shelley, Montaigne, Plutarch, Whitman, The 
Conscript, Browning, Smiles 's Selp Help (for 
which book he has always entertained a serious 
veneration), and Swinburne. 

He had begun to read Shakespeare at 
twenty-six. 

"I discovered Walter Scott at forty-five," 
" R. B." once told me. He began to read the 
Greeks and Latins at forty, and they have 
formed the staple of his literary diet ever since. 
He had never happened on the Odyssey 
until about two years ago, and he was a happy 
man for weeks when he had found it. Darwin, 
who is one of " R. B.'s " great literary heroes, 
ca.me to him at forty. 

As to the authors who have most influenced 
him, he gives this list : 

Dickens, Plato, Carlyle, Darwin, Ruskin, 
Sterne, Emerson, Smiles. 

Authors who have influenced him in a lesser 
degree are 

Gilbert White, Defoe, Bunyan, Thackeray, 
Sir T. Browne, Milton, Shakespeare, Lamb, 
Leigh Hunt, "The Poets," and " The 
Greeks." 

All these friends, or nearly all of them, find 



158 Robert 'Blatchford 

a niche in the books about books, together with 
a mixed company of moderns, varying in 
character from Stevenson to Mrs. Meynell. If 
you want to gather an idea of the remarkable 
variety of Mr. Blatchford's book-lore, read 
the paper in A Book About Books called " The 
Little People." 

Here is a long quotation (yes, I must do it) 
from an essay in defence of books about books. 
It exhibits, I think, very clearly the peculiar 
charm, the grave good-humour, real learn- 
ing, and fine discrimination which Mr. Blatch- 
ford brings to this sort of writing : 

" What literary pope is responsible for the 
bull by whose authority ' books about books ' 
are excommunicated ? 

" Is the damnatory edict older than 
Montaigne? It is, at any rate, as old, for in 
his essay, 'Of Experience,' Montaigne says: 

' There is more ado to interpret interpreta- 
tions than to interpret things; and more books 
upon books than upon any other subject; we 
do nothing but comment upon one another. 
Every place swarms with commentaries; of 
authors there is great scarcity.' 

" The evil that men write lives after them. 
This, which Montaigne said in his haste, many 
a callow ready-writer repeats glibly at his 
leisure, and a commodity of yea-forsooth 
cynics, fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils, 
now scrawl flagrantly ?bove the portals of one 



More Quotes 159 

of the most tranquil and leafy by-ways of 
belles lettres the sour legend, ' Abandon hope, 
all ye who enter here.' 

" Nevertheless, fear not, gentle reader. Let 
our latter-day Zal and Rustum bluster as they 
will, but heed not thou. 

With us along the strip of herbage strown, 
That just divides the desert from the sown, 
Where name of pope and pressman is forgot, 
And peace to Montaigne on his purple throne. 

" To return to the knight of Bordeaux. 
That is a quaint distinction which he implies. 
Of commentators there are swarms; of authors 
great scarcity ! A commentator, then, is not 
an author. He who interprets placket holes, 
devil worship, the Scandinavian mythus, or 
the reasons why monks love to be in kitchens, 
is free of the literary guild; he who interprets 
books is outside benefit of clergy; even the 
hospitable Montaigne has slammed the door 
in his face, and the literary whippersnapper, 
who retails the wooden nutmegs of his 
imagination as the delectable spice of fiction, 
or ekes out a harmful unnecessary existence by 
scribbling impertinences about society big- 
wigs, has stabbed the poor outcast with the 
leathern dagger of his wit, or shot him flying 
with a paper bullet of the brain. 

" You may rip your quill to a feather over 
small-beer chronicles, write sonnets to your 
mistress's eyebrow, babble of green fields, 



160 Robert ftlatchford 

extract metaphysical moonshine from green 
cucumbers, split the ears of the groundlings 
with windy passions, wash out human nature's 
dirty linen in the market-place, or clog Fleet 
Ditch with ' the spawn of the press on the 
follies of the hour,' and be the classic of a 
season; ay, and have your foibles chronicled 
in M.A.P., and your seven ages of portraiture 
blazoned in the sixpenny magazines. But, 
though you speak in books about books with 
the tongues of men and angels, it shall avail 
you nothing. An angel you may be, but you 
shall be written down, as Shelley was by 
Matthew Arnold, as ' an ineffectual angel, 
beating in the void your luminous wings in 
vain.' Nay, is it not possible that Solomon 
in all his glory has been misreported, and that 
what he actually said was, ' Of making books 
about books there is no end ' ? 

" But, what the good year ! Are we men, or 
mice ? Shall we, being free-born British book- 
makers, writers of books about books, allow 
a dead Frenchman to come betwixt the wind 
and our nobility? Shall the excellent Sieur 
de Montaigne, who wrote of books himself, 
and, to speak brotherly of him, sometimes 
wrote of them but dully, stand, like an awful 
constable on point duty, and with the raised 
arm of authority invidiously halt our chariot 
only, under plea of regulating public traffic ? 
I say no. I will, like the eloquent counsel of 



More Quotes 161 



Mrs. Bardell, 'appeal to an enlightened, a 
high-minded, a right-feeling, a conscientious, 
a dispassionate, a sympathising, a contempla- 
tive jury of my fellow-countrymen.' 

" There can be but one sound reason for 
avoiding a book about books, and that is 
because the book is not a good one a reason 
that will serve equally well for avoiding what 
Oliver Wendell Holmes calls 'broken-winded 
novels, and spavined verses.' If Montaigne 
disliked the commentators of his time, we may 
be sure they deserved it, and it is no part of 
my case to defend every fusty pedant and 
prosy bore who may, in past times, have mis- 
used some honest author by thumping him like 
a 'drum ecclesiastic/ or have wearied an un- 
willing congregation with his tedious homilies. 
There are, I admit, amongst the higher ranks 
of English literature, several captains of 
renown whose solemn and authoritative 
utterances on books might be lost or burned 
without serious check to the gaiety of nations. 
That delightful old humbug, Fadladeen, who 
serves as comic interlude between the scenes in 
Lalla Rookh y is the very type of the literary 
bore in a full-bottomed wig who trampled with 
elephantine feet all over some poet's garden, 
measuring dimensions with his land-surveyor's 
chain, pompously declaring that Shakespeare 
was longer, Spenser broader, this more oval, 
that more square, and neither conformable to 
M 



162 Robert 'Blatchford 

the classic pattern of Horace or of Virgil. No 
reader, no writer, will trouble about the men- 
suration of these robustious, periwig-pated, 
queer old fogies. It is not the dimensions of 
the garden, but the colour and perfume of the 
flowers that we prize. And why may not you, 
or I, or he, or she, loiter awhile in some shady 
walk, or rest a little in some musky arbour, or, 
plucking a rose for our own pleasure, call to 
a friend to mark its beauty ? ' ' 

Is it not worth while to have called for an 
"encore" to that pretty piece of writing? 
There will not be anything much better to read 
in to-day's paper, 7 know. 



Chapter XVI. The 
" Thunder <Books" 



NOW let us consider, so briefly as may 
be, the thunder-books God and My 
Neighbour and Not Guilty. 
Mr. Blatchford's reputation with the outside 
public with the "Socialists? I'd like to shoot 
'em!" type of person is based almost 
entirely upon these contributions to rationalist 
and determinist literature. I knew Mr. Blatch- 
ford when he was writing the two books I have 
named I watched him writing them, you may 
say; and therefore I know with what deep 
earnestness and with how high a purpose he set 
himself to the task. But I also know that he 
did not enjoy the task not one little bit. He 
did enjoy writing the books about books and 
Tales for the Marines, and Fantasias, and the 
Dolly Ballads. These the "outside public" 
has never read. Which is a great pity, because 
you cannot properly estimate the worth of a 
man's arguments without some grasp of his 
premises. 

But it is no use arguing about it. Our 
people have no use for dulcimers, and they 
love the big drum, and that is all about it. 



164 Robert IMatchford 

In God and My 'Neighbour, " R. B." rolled 
them a roll which kept them quick marching 
atheists, priests, scientists, divines, and 
common scoffers for more than two years. 
God and My Neighbour woke them up. 

When Mr. Blatchford's first article in con- 
demnation of certain Christian dogmas 
appeared in the Clarion, many readers of the 
paper became highly agitated. When the 
second article was printed, this agitation 
turned to horror. Then came the final and 
most crushing blow. Mr. Blatchford caused 
it to be known that his little " baggage action " 
was not really a baggage action at all, being, 
in fact, a full-blown, double-breasted cam- 
paign, "to be continued'* in the paper week 
by week for an indefinite period. 

The feeling which now agitated the bosoms 
of the afflicted was one of blank dismay. 
Socialists all over England went into mourn- 
ing, and told each other that Socialism would 
die was dead; Nunquam had killed it. 

And how had Nunquam killed Socialism? 
Had he recanted aught of his opinions ? Had 
he eaten, so to speak, of swine flesh ? Had he 
joined the Liberty and Property Defence 
League, or accepted a knighthood ? Not then, 
at all events. Perhaps he had been seen to 
enter a first-class railway compartment, wear- 
ing c tall hat ? Perhaps there was truth in the 
rumour that he truckled to class prejudice by 




T THS 



TIMS. 



The " Thunder 'Books " 165 

adorning his extremities with spats? No; 
these charges were not under consideration. 
They might be true, and, if so, every earnest 
democrat would doubtless give them the 
serious attention which they merited. But 
they were not present in our minds when we 
asserted that Nunquam had killed Socialism. 
What had Nunquam done, then, to warrant 
our despair ? Friends, he had .... told the 
truth! 

Sensible people, therefore, did not allow 
themselves to be worried with fears for 
Socialism. How can the truth any sort of 
truth kill Socialism? You cannot quench 
fire with fire nor mop up water with water. You 
cannot kill truth with truth. 

But there was another and more personal 
danger in the situation which I, at any rate, 
viewed with some apprehension. This was the 
danger that Mr. Blatchford's latest frontal 
attack on the Citadel of Lies should damage 
his reputation, in the worldly sense, and inflict 
a monetary loss upon the Clarion. All adver- 
tisers are not Socialists, and all persons who 
profess Socialism are not necessarily wise and 
just. And so, while one did not fear for 
Socialism, one did fear that the fortunes of 
the Clarion, regarded as a journalistic venture, 
might be seriously affected by the courage and 
candour of its Editor. And, like many other 
people, I discussed the matter with him. It is 



166 Robert 'Blatchford 

only honest to mention that my interest in the 
Clarion's finances was not purely platonic. 
The paper then owed me three guineas. 

But we need not have worried. Before half- 
a-dozen of the articles had appeared people 
came joyfully to realise that their fears had 
been baseless. Whilst admiring Mr. Blatch- 
ford's qualities as a. thinker and a writer, one 
is sometimes apt to forget that he is also a 
journalist. He is also the possessor of a rare 
form of sensitiveness that which is sensitive 
to the sensitiveness of others. And so it 
happened that the articles were characterised 
by a wonderful restraint in the writing of them 
born of a keen sense of the journalistic fit- 
ness of things, and a most graceful and 
goodly restraint in the spirit, and form, and 
" feel " of them. The journalistic instinct 
was not responsible for that. 

God and My Neighbour is, as it were, the 
rarified extract, the chemical resultant, of 
these brilliant Clarion articles. It is, I think, 
the sanest, gentlest, most honest and con- 
vincing book on its subject which I have ever 
read. Its opposition to conventional 
Christianity is so logically founded and so 
logically expressed. 

The literary qualities of the book its 
craftsmanship must be admired even by 
Christians. These same qualities, I think, will 
also appeal strongly to those readers whose 



The " Thunder "Books " 167 

acquaintance with the literature of Agnos- 
ticism is most wide. My own reading in that 
line has been lamentably restricted; but the 
mere fact that God and My Neighbour at once 
imbued me with an unquenchable thirst for 
further knowledge on the same subject is, I 
think, a sufficient proof of its propagandist 
value. 

You see, I did not approach God and My 
Neighbour wkh any preconception of awe and 
reverence. I did not say to myself : " This is 
the Gospel according to Blatchford; let us, 
therefore, believe on it." I took the book for 
what it set out to be an exposition of the 
arguments and facts which have led Mr. 
Blatchford, together with a vast number of 
other intelligent men, to form the opinion that 
" Christianity is not true." I delivered the 
volume into the hands of all the scholarly 
and earnest Christians of my acquaintance, 
and requested them to pick holes in it. You 
may be sure that they did not fail to attempt 
this feat, but with an assurance none too 
marked. The book impressed them with a 
sense of its power. They saw that this was no 
case of the eager apostate blaspheming in his 
wrath. Here was something lucid, and 
definite, and complete, and strong. The calm, 
deliberate masterfulness of the whole perform- 
ance gave them pause. This book did not 
content itself with appealing to their reason. 



1 68 Robert Watch ford 

It appealed to their reason in terms which their 
reason could comprehend in a manner, more- 
over, so simple and direct that it offered no 
man a loophole for believing that he did not 
comprehend. This book was powerful. This 
book was interesting. This book was new. 

When you say that a book is powerful, and 
interesting, and new, you say that it is litera- 
ture. To interest and refresh and command 
the mind is the mission of literature. Mr. 
Blatchford's book does these things most 
excellently well, and that is why I say that it 
is the literary qualities of the work which 
fascinate me most. I am not referring particu- 
larly to Mr. Blatchford's style I shall have a 
word or two to say about that later. I look 
at this book as a book, and I am filled with 
admiration at the wonderful craftsmanship 
which has gone to its making. 

I say quite frankly that many of the argu- 
ments in this book, much of the science and 
philosophy, have been borrowed from other 
writers. But I will tell you what has not 
been borrowed, and that is the art which 
has set these old truths forth in such wise 
that a child might read them with under- 
standing, and a grown man with pleasure 
and profit. I will tell you of another thing 
which has not been borrowed, and that is the 
art which has pieced, and separated, and 
joined, and re-joined these truths in such wise 



The " Thunder 'Books " 169 

as to form a whole which is almost perfect in 
logic and completeness, and that arrestive 
faculty which we call "power." There are 
yet other qualities which have not been 
borrowed. These are humanity, great 
simplicity, abiding honesty; and there re- 
mains, finally, the most intangible, and yet 
the most important, feature of all the per- 
sonality, the mysterious "ego," of the thing. 
Only Mr. Blatchford might explain that 
mystery. I am quite certain that he will not, 
however, and I am not sure that he could. 

Have I made clear my meaning that this 
book fascinates one, not by reason of the 
originality of its purpose and material, but by 
virtue of its wonderful construction and per- 
fect design and its simple strength ? 

My favourite chapter in this book is called 
"The Parting of the Ways." There are two 
paragraphs in it which, I think, convey the 
whole spirit and purpose of the book. In- 
cidentally, I think, also, they show us some- 
thing of the author : 

(1) ". . . . If there is a Father in Heaven, 
He is likely to be better pleased by our loving 
and serving our fellow creatures (His children) 
than by our singing and praying to Him, while 
our brothers and sisters (His children) are 
ignorant, or brutalised, or hungry, or in 
trouble. 

(2) "I speak as a father myself when I say 



170 Robert 'Blatchford 

that I should not like to think that one of my 
children would be so foolish and so unfeeling 
as to erect a marble tomb to my memory while 
the others needed a friend or a meal. And I 
speak in the same spirit when I add that to 
build a cathedral, and to spend our tears and 
pity upon a Saviour who was crucified nearly 
two thousand years ago, while women and men 
and little children are being crucified in our 
midst, without pity and without help, is cant, 
and sentimentality, and a mockery of God." 

You will observe that the second of the 
paragraphs which I quote contains more than 
one hundred words. You will also observe 
that this number includes but eight words of 
Latin origin, and four of those ("crucified," 
"cathedral," etc.) are essential to the text. 
This leaves us four words to divide among 
a hundred one Latinism to twenty-five words. 
I have not specially selected that paragraph. 
You will find the same amazing store of good 
Saxon in any other sentence or paragraph in 
the book. This feature of his writing alone is 
sufficient to single out Mr. B latch ford as a 
stylist of rare worth. But Mr. Blatchford's 
method of writing has many other virtues 
crispness, lucidity, "bite," "grip," and the 
much-worshipped and much-wooed " short 
sentence." Mr. Blatchford's style is all style. 

All that I have written about God and My 
Neighbour applies in a general sense to Not 



The\ " Thunder Books " 171 

Guilty which is, in a sense, a continuation of 
the first book. In Not Guilty the arguments upon 
which Mr. B latch ford builds up the case for 
his neighbour are carried to their logical con- 
clusion. Not Guilty is Determinism reduced 
to Anglo-Saxon. Mr. Blatchford calls his 
book "The Case for the Bottom Dog." He 
tells us things which have been familiar 
commonplaces to philosophers throughout the 
ages, but which most of us are ignorant about 
because we cannot read the language which 
philosophers will talk. In an " apology ' ' 
which prefaces Not Guilty, " R. B." states the 
whole Determinist position in two or three 
hundred words. The rest of his book is 
devoted to establishing and defending that 
position. 

"Knowing," he says, "as I do, how the 
hard-working and hard-playing public shun 
laborious thinking and serious writing, and 
how they hate to have their ease disturbed or 
their prejudices handled rudely, I still make 
bold to undertake this task, because of the 
vital nature of the problems I shall probe. 

" Much golden eloquence has been 
squandered in praise of the successful and the 
good; much stern condemnation has been 
vented upon the wicked. I venture now to 
plead for those of our poor brothers and sisters 
who are accursed of Christ and rejected of 
men. 



172 Robert Watchford 

" Hitherto all the love, all the honours, all 
the applause of this world, and all the rewards 
of heaven, have been lavished on the fortunate 
and the strong; and the portion of the un- 
friended Bottom Dog, in his adversity and 
weakness, has been curses, blows, chains, the 
gallows, and everlasting damnation. 

" I shall plead, then, for those who are 
loathed and tortured and branded as the sin- 
ful and unclean; for those who have hated us 
and wronged us, and have been wronged and 
hated by us. I shall defend them for right's 
sake, for pity's sake, and for the benefit of 
society and the race. For these also are of 
our flesh, these also have erred and gone 
astray, these also are victims of an inscrutable 
and relentless Fate. 

"If it concerns us that the religions of the 
world are childish dreams, or nightmares; if 
it concerns us that our penal laws and moral 
codes are survivals of barbarism and fear; if it 
concerns us that our most cherished and 
venerable ideas of our relations to God and 
to each other are illogical and savage, 
then the case for the Bottom Dog concerns 
us nearly. 



" Rightly or wrongly, happily or unhappily, 
but with all the sincerity of my soul, I shall 
here deny the justice and reason of every kind 



The "Thunder Books" 173 

of blame and praise, of punishment and 
reward human or divine. 

" Divine law the law made by priests and 
attributed to God consists of a code of 
rewards and punishments for acts called good 
or bad. Human law the law made by Kings 
and Parliaments consists of a code of punish- 
ments for acts called criminal, or unlawful. 

" I claim that men should not be classified 
as good and bad, but as fortunate and un- 
fortunate; that they should be pitied, and not 
blamed; helped instead of being punished. 

" I claim that since we do not hold a man 
worthy of praise for being born beautiful, nor 
of blame for being born ugly, neither should 
we hold him worthy of praise for being born 
virtuous, nor of blame for being born vicious. 

"I base this claim upon the self-evident 
and undeniable fact that man has no part in 
the creation of his own nature. 

"I shall be told this means that no man is 
answerable for his own acts. 

" That is exactly what it does mean. 

" But, it will be urged, every man has a free 
will to act as he chooses; and to deny that is 
to imperil all law and order, all morality and 
discipline. 

"I deny both these inferences, and I ask 
the reader to hear my case patiently, and to 
judge it on its merits. 

"Let us first test the justice of our laws, 



174 Robert 'Blatchford 

divine and human : the question of their use- 
fulness we will deal with later.* ' 

As for that which follows, I think that it is 
a complete and absolutely unanswerable pre- 
sentation of the Determinist case. All sorts of 
people, ranging in degrees of knowledge and 
attainment from Nonconformist ministers to 
Mr. G. K. Chesterton, took up the challenge 
and upheld the theory of free will according 
to their several abilities. But Mr. Blatchford's 
case, I think, remains unshaken. 

Don't you think it curious that Mr. Blatch- 
ford should have written Not Guilty? It 
seems so absurd and improbable a performance 
to come from a man who has written Tales for 
the Marines and the Dolly Ballads and 
articles about Dreadnoughts. Well, my friends, 
the truth of the matter is that "R. B." is an 
improbable sort of man. 

Some of "R. B.'s" actions, however, are not 
nearly so improbable as it suits his kind critics 
to pretend. Just as this book proceeds to press 
a sudden noise arises, emanating from some 
articles which "R. B?' has written "in the 
Capitalist Press." These articles relate to the 
very important question of Anglo-German 
relations and to the danger which all intelli- 
gent persons know to be actual, and which 
many people believe to be imminent, of a con- 
flict between this country and Germany. 

Most of the noise is being produced by 



The " Thunder 'Books " 175 

"critics" who share Mr. Blatchford's own 
economic views. These gentlemen, with many 
thumps on the tablecloth, are denouncing 
" R. B." as a traitor and impostor, and are 
charging him (as is their critical way) with 
having sold the movement and himself to "the 
Capitalists." 

Now, all this affretation of surprise and 
indignation is surely somewhat uncalled for. 
My friend has for years made no secret of his 
Imperialist sympathies : he has for years pro- 
claimed quite openly his deep conviction that 
aggressive designs against this country are 
cherished in Berlin. He has written on these 
matters in the Clarion for so long, at any rate, 
as I have known him. But now that he has 
chosen to say the same things to another and 
a wider audience, he is charged with incon- 
sistency, with treachery, with malice nay, 
more: with being actuated by the basest of 
motives. 

The people who do this to Mr. Blatchford 
are dishonest. He has never hesitated in the 
past to make use of " the Capitalist Press " for 
such propagandist purposes as seemed useful 
to him. When those purposes have been agree- 
able to the prejudices of Mr. Blatchford's 
" friends " it has been very well ; but when, as 
now, they happen to conflict with the placid 
beliefs of these gentlemen, my friend is accused 
of inconsistency, of worse. Why? If he 



176 Robert 'Blatchford 

may write about the obvious significance of 
German military preparations in the Clarion, 
he may write on the same subject in the Daily 
Mail. If (as he has done) he may write about 
Socialism in the Daily Mail, why is he not to 
write about militarism, or any other "ism," in 
the Daily Mail? 

The bitter opposition which these articles 
have provoked from Mr. Blatchford's erstwhile 
friends is compensated for by the appreciation 
which they have wrung from his erstwhile 
enemies. This fact again gives rise to curious 
reflections. 

When "R. B" published God and My 
Neighbour and Not Guilty, those books were 
ignored or pooh-poohed by the "respectable" 
papers. It was carefully explained to the 
readers of such journals that Mr. Blatchford 
was a "demagogue": a shallow, catch-penny 
sensationalist, whose writings were addressed 
to the vulgar and credulous mob. " Cultured " 
people were not to be troubled by them. 

But directly Mr. Blatchford concerns him- 
self with matters which do not affect the selfish 
interests of " cultured people," we learn that he 
is a deep thinker and a trenchant writer. His 
"German" articles have elicited letters of 
praise and congratulation from half the social 
and intellectual "swells" in England. From 
judges, lawyers, generals, admirals and 
savants. Yea, even from the clergy. 



The " Thunder 'Books " i77 

It is the revolutionaries, the " unrespectables," 
who now find Mr. Blatchford a demagogue 
and a sensationalist. 

Well, it is clear that a man who is capable of 
commanding applause or censure at will from 
the extremes of Society is a remarkable man. 

In my next and concluding chapter I shall 
try to tell you just what sort of man he is. 



N 



Chapter XVIL 'Per- 
sonalities 



WHEN I first set eyes on Mr. Blatchford 
only the top of him was visible. He 
stood behind a mahogany counter 
and looked me up and down with eyes which 
were very big and very black and very 
calm. He wore (and wears) a heavy black 
moustache, of the type which was once in 
fashion amongst Oriental despots. This 
ornament entirely screens his mouth, and on 
meeting him for the first time and arguing 
from the particular to the general, you 
naturally imagine that he has a despotic mouth 
to match : which is not the case. He has a 
chin, mind you, and a jaw not at all the sort 
of jaw which it is useful to fall over but his 
mouth, as may be seen in the youthful photo- 
graphs we have printed, is not terrible. 

I stood, as it were, on the safe side of the 
counter, and returned the gaze. I tried to tell 
myself that I did not falter; that boldly and 
deliberately, according to the arrangement 
which I had come to with myself, I scrutinised 
this man and took his measure in guineas. You 



i8o Robert 'Blatchford 

must understand that at this time I knew but 
this much of " R. B." : that he was "one of 
these Socialist beggars," and had written me a 
letter respecting a book which I had published, 
and offering to print some of my stories in the 
Clarion. Therefore did it behove me to view 
him with a bold and mathematical eye; but 
when he actually appeared and faced me, like 
that, with those eyes, his shoulders square, and 
his fist on the counter, I do not believe that I 
thought about guineas at all. 

Suddenly the man's jaw dropped, after a 
manner peculiarly its own, and the noble 
moustachio cocked itself sideways and 
behold ! the man behind the counter was 
smiling. He also spoke. 

*' So you wrote so-and-so," he said. " Ha ! >: 

I also said " Ha ! " It seemed to be the 
jolly and appropriate thing to say. Then 
"R. B." said: "Let's go out and have a 
drink." 

We went out, and stopped out, and talked 
about Karl Marx and Love and Rudyard 
Kipling, and the pianola, and marriage, and 
tobacco, and Sir Thomas Browne, and Mr. 
Chamberlain. We walked about Fleet Street 
and beheld the aristocracy of intellect, and 
wondered what it felt like to wear that sort of 
tie. When Mr. Blatchford had missed a 
respectable number of trains, we separated. I 
saw him off by the train which he did not miss, 



Personalities 181 

and as it drew out of the station he put his 
head through the window-opening and called 
out : 

" By the way forgot to mention it send us 
in some stories; don't forget." 

That, I think, is a full and verbatim report 
of the business portion of our conversation 
that afternoon. 

You may suppose that I thought a good deal 
about " R. B." that evening, and so far as I am 
now able to remember, the personal feature 
which most impressed me was his remarkable 
gift of phraseology. (I had been touched, of 
course, by the kindness and sympathy which 
he had shown to me that day. But that is the 
sort of reminiscence which one does not put 
into books.) I had been invigorated by his 
rich and spontaneous humour, and I had not 
failed to observe how honest, determined, and 
altogether definite a person he was. But the 
characteristic which, as I say, most impressed 
itself upon my youthful fancy was " R. B.'s " 
remarkable way of talking. 

Men who write well do not always talk well. 
Good writing is normally the result of infinite 
care and labour, and, therefore, produces 
itself slowly. But in conversation it is not 
possible, or at any rate desirable, to make long 
pauses between words while you look about 
for exactitudes of expression. The writer 
has been trained to work in this leisurely 



182 Robert Blatchford 

fashion, and his verbal utterances, therefore, 
are often either halting or imperfect. But 
" R. B." alone among all the authors I have 
ever known talks exactly as he writes plain, 
Saxon words, which exactly convey his mean- 
ing, and which he forms without effort into 
perfectly-modelled sentences. I have never 
heard him tell a story or utter an opinion 
which was not expressed naturally and without 
effort in what is called literary form. To 
speak of " R. B." as a "born writer," then, is 
to utter more than an empty phrase; for 
"R. B.'s " literary gifts are to a remarkable 
degree instinctive. 

Mr. B latch ford is obviously a desirable com- 
panion. He is a man of very wide and 
genuine culture, and he is "very noticing/* as 
they say of the children. His sincerity and 
earnestness, his hatred of sham, his strong 
logical faculty, his irrepressible humour, com- 
bine to make him an irresistible " talker ' ' even 
from the academic standpoint. But he shines 
forth even more brilliantly as a gossip and 
playfellow. No subject is too simple or 
ordinary too beastly human for " R. B.'s " 
consideration; no pastime too useless for his 
amusement. I have sat for hours by his side 
on the sea-shore shying stones at a bottle (and 
hitting it once to his twenties, be it said); I 
have lain on my chest throughout a summer's 
day and shot at postcards and clay pipes with 



Personalities 183 



an air-gun in strenuous competition with the 
author of Not Guilty. I have helped to dress 
and burnt-cork that gentleman for the delecta- 
tion of his trembling family into a terrible 
representation of the Terrible Turk. I have 
taught him how to play word-diamonds. On 
the other hand, I have discussed with him not 
merely Free Trade, Free Love, the Nebular 
theory, and Progressive Revelation, but also 
sea-sickness, Bath buns, the Tam-o'-Shanter 
Girl, and Surrey versus Yorkshire. 

It is a curious fact and one which gives rise 
to all sorts of considerations respecting the 
nuances of friendship that " R. B." entertains 
one more, if anything, during his occasional 
fits of depression and boredom than when he is 
well and wicked. This is not because it 
amuses one to see " R. B." unhappy, but 
because he takes his unhappiness so happily. 
His humour is never so keen, so whimsical, 
and, withal, so wistful as upon those occasions 
when he is out of conceit with the universe. 
When Mr. Blatchford "humps himself," as 
he calls it, his hair turns two degrees more 
grey a temporary phenomenon his counten- 
ance assumes a vivid blueness; he sits very 
close to the fire, with rounded shoulders, and 
he maketh sport. I remember finding him 
in the fender, as it were, on one of his 
moody 'days two years ago. He looked 
up as I entered the room, nodded grimly, 



184 Robert 'Blatchford 

pulled at his pipe, and resumed his close 
inspection of the hob. After some moments 
of silent meditation he spoke. "How long 
is it to April ? " he inquired, with extreme 
gravity. 

"Nine weeks/* I answered, after rapid 
calculation. 

" Oh ! " said " R. B." " I shall go out for a 
short walk in April." 

I do not want anybody to suppose that Mr. 
Blatchford is in any way a "nervous subject." 
He is a very healthy and vital person of 
middle age. But he has fallen into an un- 
fortunate habit of catching the influenza. You 
know what that means. We have suggested 
to him that he should ask permission from the 
democracy to spend his winters in Italy or 
Egypt ; but he scorns our suggestions. He has 
never condescended to support this attitude by 
argument, but it is generally supposed 
amongst his convives that the snow-capped 
hills and tinkling bells of Norwood have 
captured his heart. My God, how they tinkle, 
those bells ! There is a half -minute tram 
service in constant operation exactly opposite 
the editorial front door, and the bells thereof 
form a subject of constant editorial profanity. 
But the Old Man will not leave them. 
Thus are we the creatures of our environ- 
ment. 

Although he cannot be persuaded to seek 



Personalities 185 



relief from bells and bacteria upon the shores 
of the Mediterranean, that ocean is, neverthe- 
less, the constant subject of Mr. Blatchford's 
dreams. Water-colour painting is a favourite 
pastime of his solitudes, and when the hump is 
at its worst and the bells most loud and fre- 
quent and the beauties of Norwood most 
evident, he sends to the office for vast supplies 
of cobalt blue, and you may imagine him, as I 
have seen him, seated at his desk with tubes 
of colour and stacks of brushes upon his either 
flank, and Mediterraneans in various stages of 
preparation opposing him. These paintings, 
by the way, are characteristic of the man. I 
have observed that all writers play at making 
pictures just (I suppose) as artists play at 
making poems. I have observed, also, that a 
writer's pictures, even though they be crude or 
merely grotesque, reflect in some queer, in- 
definable way the literary qualities of him who 
has produced them. Now, " R. B.'s " paint- 
ings are not crude. I am more than usually 
ignorant where pictures are concerned, and 
therefore speak with diffidence; but, having 
expressed that reservation, I make bold to say 
that " R. B.'s " seascapes are pretty and grace- 
ful and accomplished, and that they exhibit a 
rich sense of colour. But whatever their 
technical merits may be, there can, I think, be 
no doubt that they possess qualities exactly 
similar to those which distinguish his best 



186 Robert 'Blatchford 

literary work extreme simplicity and rigid 
economy. All his pictures contain simply sea 
and sky, and sometimes very rarely a sail. 
You can take it or leave it at that. If you are 
lucky, you take it. 

I suppose, now, that it is up to one to write 
about " R. B.'s " political temperament. 

I have said somewhere that, in my view, he 
is essentially that is to say, spiritually a 
Tory. I stand by that declaration even at the 
risk of having to convince Mr. Blatchford him- 
self, by banging a table, of the truth of it. 

It has always seemed to me that Toryism is 
not so much a political condition of mind as 
it is an emotional state. There is always this 
difference between the Tory and the so-called 
Liberal : the Tory is a spiritualist, seeking, 
sometimes consciously, sometimes as the result 
of sheer instinct, to defend and preserve those 
things which are familiar to him and which he 
reveres by virtue of association, tradition, and 
sentiment. Your "Liberal/* upon the other 
hand, trades in flour, and cannot for the life 
of him understand why sentiment should be 
mixed up with questions of business i.e., 
government. That those beliefs and customs 
which the emotional Tory bleeds for at the 
ballot-box are often barbarous and disgusting 
is outside the scope of this inquiry, as is also 
the fact that flour-dealers are often in the right 
about water rates. The important thing is 



Personalities 187 

that one deals in sentiment and the other in 
flour. 

It is pure sentiment class sentiment which 
inspires the squire of my parish (a retiring, 
gentlemanly, ignorant man) to stand up in 
schoolrooms and get very red and awkward in 
defence of Christianity, the rights of property, 
beer, etc. And I contend that it is an exactly 
similar sentiment which is voiced by Mr. 
Blatchford. The two men think along identi- 
cal lines to opposite ends with the difference, 
of course, that Mr. Blatchford thinks briskly 
and definitely, whilst the squire's little brain 
can scarcely hobble. Both men are passion- 
ately in earnest; both men are sentimentalists, 
devotedly attached to the traditions of their 
class. Both men, as it were, are fighting about 
poems. One man's poem is Tennyson's 
Princess; the other man stands for The 
Cottar's Saturday Night. There is persistent 
divergence about the poems, but none at all 
concerning poetry. Neither man cares tup- 
pence for the flour trade. 

Between these men there stand two other 
men the flour-dealer, already introduced to 
your notice, and the Revolutionary, the 
rebel : he who has revolted with sword and 
Blue Book ; he whose quarrel is not with a class 
or with a system, but with all classes and all 
systems; he whose mission is not so much to 
despoil the squire and exalt that gentleman's 



i88 Robert Elatchford 

shepherd as to gently eliminate all squires and 
all shepherds, and set gods in their places. 

It is not for me (thank you) to judge 
between these men and the impulses which 
they represent. I desire merely to present 
them as I see them, and incidentally to present 
my reasons for calling " R. B." a "Tory." 

But it is for me to point out that sentiment 
is a far stronger thing than reason. When 
Mr. Blatchford and the squire have arrived 
at the respective ends of their single line, there 
will be nothing for either gentleman to do but 
walk back till he bumps the other unless you 
conceive the line as being centrally pivoted, in 
which case the voyager who first gets home 
and I am putting my money on " R. B." will 
only have to hold on tight till the other comes 
after him by force, as it were, of natural 
attrition. Whatever happens, there will be 
either a sudden collision or gradual fusion of 
all impulses collected on the line of sentiment. 

The revolutionary and the flour-dealer will 
have to do gymnastics on their own line. But 
it is a short line, and carries a light weight 
as compared to the other. It seems to me 
that "R. B." and the squire, when they do 
join up and have agreed to sing in a common 
metre, will have it all their own way. 

I leave my friend with confidence at his end 
of the line. I wish him continued power, 
determination, and endurance. 



Personalities 189 



I can wish him nothing else; for he has 
already all things which are worth the wishing 
of mortals. He has a woman and children of 
his own; he has his sticks of cobalt blue; he 
has the respect of all thinking men and the 
affection of all gentlemen; he has the love of 
all his friends; he has his piano and his tram 
bells and his John Sebastien Bach. He has 
the confidence and fellowship of a hundred 
thousand disciples, and the songs of the 
thrushes which he feeds each morning in his 
garden. 



THE END. 



BOOKS BY THE CLARION PRESS, 

44, WORSHIP STREET, LONDON, B.C. 

By ROBERT BLATCHFORD. 

MERRIE ENGLAND. By ROBERT BLATCHFORD. A New Edition. 
Paper cover, 3d. ; by post 4d. Cloth, i/- ; by post 1/2. 

" Metric England " first appeared as a series of articles in the CLARION in 
1892-3. These articles, with some revisions and additions, were afterwards 
produced in volume form at a shilling. The book met with immediate success, 
some 25,000 copies being sold. 

Iii October, 1894, the CLARION published the same book, uniform in size and 
type with the shilling edition, at the low price of ONE PENNY. As the book 
contained 206 pages, and was printed by trade-union labour, and on British-made 
paper, it could only be produced at a loss. This loss was borne by the proprietors 
of the CLARION. 

The sale of the penny edition outran all expectations. No one supposed that 
more than 100,000 would be called for, but in a few months over 700,000 had been 
sold, without a penny being spent in advertisement, and in face of the tremendous 
opposition excited by Socialistic publications in those days. 

Later on an edition was published at 3d., and the total sale reached nearly a 
million copies. 

BRITAIN FOR THE BRITISH. A further exposition of Socialism. 
Price 2/6 net ; by post, 2/9. Paper cover, 3d. ; by post, 4jd. 

This book was written to take the place of " Merrie England," and has had a 
sale of 300,000 copies. It deals with the problem of Socialism from a practical, 
present day standpoint. 

THE SORCERY SHOP: AN IMPOSSIBLE ROMANCE. Cloth, 
1/6 net. ; by post, 1/9. Paper cover, 6d. net ; by post, 8d. 

A BOOK ABOUT BOOKS. Cloth and gold, /6 net ; by post, 2/9. 
MY FAVOURITE BOOKS. Cloth and gold, 2/6 net ; by post, 2/9. 
DISMAL ENGLAND. Price, cloth and gold, 2/6 net ; by post, 2/9. 

Vivid sketches of the life of the people at work and at play. Contains articles 
on The Chemical Workers, The Chain Makers, The Song of the Shirt, Life on the 
Canals, The Police Court, The Signalman, The Lion Tamer, etc., etc. 

TOMMY ATKINS. A Military Novel. Price, cloth, 1/6 net ; post 
free, 1/9. Paper, I/- net ; by post, 1/3. 

Robert Blatchford served seven years in the Army, and rose to the rank ot 
Sergeant. This experience furnished him with the material for a budget of soldier 
stories, which are, by good judges, reckoned to be the best pictures of soldier life 
yet drawn. "Sir Evelyn Wood sat up all night to read 'Tommy Atkins,' and 
praised it highly." 

TALES FOR THE MARINES. A New Book of Soldier Stories. 
Price, cloth, 2/6 net ; by post, 2/9. Paper, I/- net ; by post, 1/2. 

JULIE A Study of a Girl by a Man. A Story of Slum Life. Price, 
cloth, 2/6 net ; by post, 2/9. 

A SON OF THE FORGE. Price, cloth, 1/6 net ; by post, 1/8. 
Paper, i/- net ; by post, 1/2. 

Robert Blatchford's Crimean War Story. Some of the earlier incidents are 
based on the author's own experiences. 

GOD AND MY NEIGHBOUR. Price 2/6 cloth, net ; by post, 2/9. 
Paper, 3d. ; by post, 4$d. 

This is an examination of the claims of Christianity to be the one true religion. 
It has created more controversy in the religious world than any book published 
the last ten years. The author considers it still unanswered. 



NOT GUILTY. A Defence of the Bottom Dog. Price, cloth, 2/6 

net ; by post, 2/9. Paper covers, 6d. ; by post, 7id. 
A BOHEMIAN GIRL. An Up-to-Date Love Story. Cloth and 

gold, 2/6 net ; by post, 2/9. 

DOLLY BALLADS. With 280 Illustrations by the late Frank 
Chesworth. Price, cloth, 3/6 ; by post, 3/10. 

By R. B. SUTHERS. 

COMMON OBJECTIONS TO SOCIALISM ANSWERED. Price, 
cloth, i/- net ; by post, 1/2. Paper, 3d. ; by post, 4id. 
This deals with the common arguments met with in the press and on the plat- 
form, e.g., That Socialism is based on the fallacy that Labour is the only source 
of Wealth, That Socialism means Confiscation, That Socialism would destroy 
Home Life, etc., etc. Full of facts, figures, and arguments. An invaluable hand- 
book for students and speakers. 

MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS. The Case for Municipal Manage- 
ment. Price, cloth, i/- net ; by post, 1/2. Paper covers, 6d. ; 
by post, 7d. 

Answers the arguments against municipal trading, explains why municipal 
debt is not a burden, and proves the advantages of municipalisation. The 
municipal reformer's text-book. 

MY RIGHT TO WORK. Price, cloth, I/- ; by post, 1/2. Paper 
cover, 6d. ; by post, 7id. 

Explains the causes of unemployment, and shows why good trade can never 
solve the problem, and demolishes the arguments in favour of the Free Trade and 
Tariff Reform remedies. 

A MAN, A WOMAN, AND A DOG. Paper cover, 6d. net. ; by 
post, 7id. 

Domestic adventures of a newly-married couple. Described as one of the 
funniest books ever written. 
JACK'S WIFE. Price, cloth, 2/6 net ; by post, 2/9. 

The further domestic adventures of Jack and Minnie. 

THE CLARION BIRTHDAY BOOK. Compiled by R. B. SUTHERS 
AND H. BESWICK from the writings of the CLARION Staff. 
Wit and Wisdom for Every Day in the Year. Price, cloth 
and gold, 2/6 net ; by post, 2/9. 

By SMITH ADAMS. 

POLITICAL ECONOMY FOR PLAIN PEOPLE. Cloth, I/- net ; 
by post, 1/3 ; paper, 6d ; by post, 8d. 

By EDWARD FRANCIS FAY. 

UNSENTIMENTAL JOURNEYS. With Illustrations by FRANK 
CHESWORTH. Price, cloth, 5/- ; by post, 5/4. 

The strange adventures of "Tlie Bounder" on his tours in the Eastern 
Counties and other parts of England and France. Wherever Mr. Fay went he 
met tramps and other queer human fish, and in this book he relates his experi- 
ences with that rare gusto and whimsicality so admired by his readers in the 
CLARION. 

By J. H. GORING. 

THE BALLAD OF LAKE LALOO, AND OTHER RHYMES. 
With 122 Illustrations by E. BENT WALKER. Price, 3/6 net ; 
by post, 3/io. 

THE CLARION SONG BOOK. Ten Parts in One Volume, price 
2/-, post free. Separate Parts in Old Notation or Tonic Sol-fa, 
price 2d. each, by post, 2|d. Book of Words only, 2d. ; by 
post, 2|d. Price to Societies, I2/- per 100, carriage paid. 



J^AVE YOU SEEN 

Women Folk 



(Edited by W1N1FRID BLATCHFORD) 
AND 



The Clarion 



(Edited by ROBERT BLATCHFORD)? 



11 T T TOMEN FOLK" is the only woman's 
\\ paper which assumes that its 
readers are not dolls or drudges, 
but WOMEN. It contains bright and 
helpful articles for all classes of women 
workers ; a record of the week's news 
specially affecting women's interests ; 
stories and sketches, etc., etc. You will 
like it, even if you are only a man. Send 
for a specimen copy to the Utopia Press, 
44, Worship Street, London, E.G. 

THE " CLARION " is the leading Labour 
and Socialist Organ. It has a cir- 
culation of over 70,000 weekly. 
More than any other influence it has 
been instrumental in bringing the ques- 
tion of Socialism so prominently before 
the public. Order from your newsagent 
or send for a specimen. 



The CLARION PRESS, 44, Worship Street, E.C. 



THE UTOPIA PRESS, Printers, 44, Worship Street, E.G. 



n . 




University of Toronto 
Library 



DO NOT 

REMOVE 

THE 

CARD 

FROM 

THIS 

POCKET