(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Children's Library | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload
See other formats

Full text of "As-Sayf Al-Battar (The Slicing Sword)"

Against THE one Who Forms Allegiances 
With the Disbelievers and Takes 
Them as Supporters Instead of Allah, 
^- His Messenger and the Believers" 




By the Eminent Scholar 

^Abd Allah ibn *Abd al-Bari al-Ahdal 

(Died in the year 1,271 H.) 

Forewarded by Shaykh Anwar Al-Awlaki 



At-TibvjAti FublicAtions 



jlj^t w^^-mJI 



,li^\ li\ji 



"The Slicing Sword 

Against the one Who 

Forms Allegiances With the Disbelievers 

and Takes Them as Supporters Instead of Allah, 
His Messenger and the Believers'" 

By the Eminent Scholar 
'Abd Allah ibn 'Abd al-Barial-Ahdal 

(Died in the year 1271 H.) 



At-Tibyan Publications 

Muharram, 1430 H. 



Table of Contents 



Table of Contents 6 

Shaykh Anwar al-Awlaki's Foreword 8 

Translator's Foreword 9 

Author's Introduction 11 

THE FIRST QUESTION: 13 

[Muslims Emigrating to the Lands, Which Were Seized by the Enemy, in Order to Build up its Economy 
While it Remains in their Control] 13 

THE SECOND QUESTION: 20 

[The Muslim Who Claims to be From the Community of the Christians and Identifies Himself with 
Their Flags etc.] 20 

THE THIRD QUESTION: 23 

[The Ruling Upon the Muslim Who Attributes Justice to the Christians and Approves of Their Authority 
and Scoffs at the Muslim Authority and their Leadership] 23 

THE FOURTH QUESTION: 28 

[The Ruling Upon the Muslim Who Ships Goods and Supplies to the Christian Lands and the Ruling 
Upon Another Muslim Who Kills Him for Doing That] 28 

THE FIFTH QUESTION: 30 

[The Ruling Upon the Muslims Who Remain Inside the Country, Which was Seized and Occupied by 
Foreign Invaders, and Subsequently Fall UnderTheir Rule] 30 

THE SIXTH QUESTION: 33 

[The Rulings Upon Those Who Emigrate to The Muslim Lands vs. Those Who Emigrate to the Lands of 
the Disbelievers and the Effect Upon the Wealth of Both Types of Emigration] 33 

THE SEVENTH QUESTION: 35 

[The Funeral Prayer of the One Who Claims to be from the Community of the Christians vs. the 
Funeral Prayer for the One Who Claims to Belong to the Community of the Muslim Kingdom] 35 

THE EIGHTH QUESTION: 36 

[The Ruling Upon the One Who Turns Away From the Ruling of Islam in Favour of the Ruling of the 
Christian Laws] 36 

Bibliography 42 

Also Available from At-Tibyan Publications 47 



Shaykh Anwar al-Awlaki's Foreword 

This book "The Slicing Sword" represents the answers given by Shayl<h Abd Allah Abd al Bari al Ahdal to 
questions on the topic of Hijra (migration for the sake of Allah) and al-wala and al-bara (loyality to Allah 
and disavowal of the enemies of Allah.) The importance of this book lies in the fact that the situation 
that the Shaykh was faced with is similar to our circumstances today which gives relevance to his 
answers. Aden was occupied by the British in 1837 and the author died around 1854. So his time was 
one in which the power of the Ottoman Khilafah was waning while the Western powers were on the 
rise. Therefore, this was a time when there were some Muslims who were replacing their pride in being 
Muslim and being subjects of Muslim rule with being subjects of Western occupiers and sailing under 
Western flags. 

The author belongs to the Ahdal family who are descendants of al Imam al Hussain bin AN and are a 
family steeped in Islamic scholarship. They are from the Shafi'i school and live on the Western coast of 
Yemen on the Red Sea. The same land of the companion of the Prophet Abu Musa al Ashari. 

I have studied this book under two scholars from the family of al Ahdal and I would encourage my 
brother and sisters to benefit from it. 



Translator's Foreword 

Verily, all praise is due to Allah and may His Blessings and Peace be upon our Prophet Muhammad and 
upon his family and his companions until the Last Day. 

To proceed: 

We present to the English reader this short series of Fatawa from Imam 'Abd Allah ibn 'Abd al-BarT al- 
Ahdal (d. 1271 H.), may Allah be merciful to him. The Imam belonged to one of the most prestigious 
scholarly families of Yemen in his time. And his descendants, may Allah reward and preserve them, 
remain upon his legacy of knowledge and Da'wah until today. 

The particular Fatawa in this treatise, known as "As-Sayf al-Battar" (i.e. "The Slicing Sword") specifically 
relates to the various rulings regarding the seizure and takeover of Muslim lands by an invading and 
occupying force, the rulings upon the Muslims therein and the state itself, the guidance of the SharT'ah 
and the Islamic response to occupied Muslim lands, and a strong condemnation of any allegiance or 
cooperation with that disbelieving, invading/occupying force. For obvious reasons this seemed 
particularly relevant to our period of time and the reader will likely see many parallels between the 
issues asked about by the questioner, and those answers offered by Al-lmam al-Ahdal, may Allah be 
merciful to him. 

The manuscript we used as the basis of our translation contained a few typographical and reference 
errors, which we attempted to correct within the text itself. In addition to these minor corrections, we 
also offered further detailed book references, explanations and definitions, HadTth origins with 
authenticity, as well as historical citations. We've done so in footnote form because the author's 
references were contained within the main text of the manuscript we used. Therefore, there was no 
need to differentiate our footnotes from those of the author, because this particular manuscript did not 
contain any of the author's references in footnote form. The final chapter of this essay contains our 
bibliography, with added publication and edition details to those book references we added. 

As with all of our translation projects, At-Tibyan Publications has attempted to adhere as closely as 
possible to the literal meaning of the original Arabic texts, rather than paraphrasing or summarizing 
their meaning in English. And we have chosen to add explanatory phrases within parentheses, along 
with explanatory footnotes, in order to clarify the meanings of certain ambiguous passages, while still 
remaining comprehensible to the English reader. The structure of the author's introduction is somewhat 
grandiose, due to his very colourful, commanding and descriptive style of writing. This style resulted in a 
slightly awkward English translation of his introduction, as we attempted to remain as accurate and 
literal to his text. And there are a few passages within the body of the essay where this style resurfaces. 
However, for the most part, the author defaults to a rather simpler, linear style of writing in the actual Q 
& A portion of the treatise, which brings more fluidity to the English translation of those sections. 

We have relied upon the "Interpretation of the Meanings of the Noble Qur'an" by Dr. Muhammad al- 
HilalT and Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan as the source of our Qur'anic translation. But all other HadTths, 
narrations, and scholarly quotations are our original translations. 



Certain common Islamic phrases were left in Arabic and defined and transliterated bellow for reference: 






AM- Jill ^^ 



Ta'ala 

'Azza wa Jail 

Subhanahu 

'Azza min Qa'il 

Sal Allahu 'alayh? wa Sallam 

'Alayht Salam 

radht Allahu 'anhu 

radht Allahu 'anhuma 



the Most High (i.e. Allah) 

the Most Powerful, the Most Exalted (i.e. Allah) 

Glory be to Him (i.e. Allah) 

the Most Powerful of those who Speak (i.e. Allah) 

may Allah send Blessings and Peaceupon him 

may the Peace (of Allah) be upon him 

may Allah be pleased with him 

may Allah be pleased with them both 



We would like to offer our most sincere gratitude to Shaykh Anwar al-Awlaki, may Allah preserve him, 
for his assistance in correcting and offering suggestions for our research and footnote commentary. 

We ask Allah, J^rj y-, to accept this small effort of ours, and to give those MujahidTn fighting in His path a 

clear and manifest victory, wherever they are fighting those disbelieving and occupying forces in Muslim 
lands. 

And may His Blessings and Peace be upon our Noble Prophet Muhammad and upon his family and his 
companions and upon all those who follow their way, until the Last Day. 

At-Tibyan Publications 



10 



Author's Introduction 

Fattah/ 

Praise be to Allah, the One who glorified the religion of Islam and protected it with the white swords and 
the dark spears and strengthened its pillars with the white SharT'ah; its night is like its day; ^ enlightened 
the edges of its paths with the light of its pulpits, humiliated polytheism and ruined it, severed the nose 
of transgression and declared it to be ignorant, annihilated the transgressing and conceited Taghut, ^ 
destroyed the pillars of its structures and the fabrications, demolished the matter of its false, broken- 
down vanities; 

<^jj^°l t^ ^l 0^' i^^ ^'j^ 
^And the life of this world is only a deceiving enjoyment.^ (AI-HadTd, 20) 

1 praise Him, as He rescued us from misguidance, and made us from the followers of His Prophet; the 
abrogater of the Legislations of the (past) Messengers who preceded him in the previous eras. O Allah, 
send Blessings and Peace upon this Great Prophet and Noble Messenger; the one whose religion You 
made dominant over all of the (other) religions. And it is the Soundest Religion, which is the Religion of 
Al-Malik (The King), Ad-Dayyan (The Recompenser).^ And (likewise send blessings) upon his family and 
his companions; those whom gave the enemies the taste of the cups of death. 



From the verse: 

4^Say: "Our Lord will assemble us all together (on the Day of Resurrection), then He will judge between us with 
truth. And He is AI-Fattah (The Judge, the Opener), AI-'AITm(the All-Knowing). "). (Saba', 26) 

Referring to the Hadtth of Al-'Irbadh ibn Sariyah, in which the Prophet, ^j i^ iii J^s, said, "/ have left you upon 
the whiteness; its night is like its day, no one strays from it after me except for one who is perished." - Narrated by 
Ibn Majah in his "Sunan", Vol. 1/16 (#43) and Ahmad in his "Musnad", Vol. 28/367 (#17,141), and declared "Sahih" 
by AI-AlbanT In "Sahih Ibn Majah", (#41), "Sahih al-JamI' as-Saghir", (#4,369) and "Sllsilat al-Ahadith as-Sahihah", 
(#937) 

Taghut:Generally, anything worshiped besides Allah, ji*, be It through an act of veneration, devotion, absolute 
servitude or by referring disputes for judgements etc. 

'^From the Hadtth of 'Abd Allah Ibn Unays, who reported that the Prophet, ^j ^^ ^\ ^, said: "Allah, Ji*; will raise 
the creation up, naked, uncircumcised and having nothing with them. He will then call them in a voice that those 
who are far, will hear just as those who are near will hear: I am al-Malik (the King), I am ad-Dayyan (the 
Recompenser)." - Narrated by Ibn AbT 'Asim In "KItab as-Sunnah", (#514) and this Is his phrasing. It was also 
narrated by Al-Bukhariin "Khalq Af'al al-'Ibad", Pg. 18 and 92, Ahmad in his "Musnad", Vol. 25/431-432 (#16,042), 
and others. It was declared "SahTh" by Ibn Hajar AI-HaytamTal-MakkT in "Az-Zawajlr 'An Iqtiraf al-Kaba'ir", Vol. 
2/243, and by AI-AlbanT in "Kitab as-Sunnah", (#514). 

11 



O Allah, grant victory to the Muslims and allow them to attain what Is correct. 



Fight the Enemies of Allah; Verily Paradise is Beneath the Shade of Swords^ 

And since the time (they first) unsheathed the whiteness of the swords of victory, they did not conceal 
them until guidance was established. And (likewise send blessings) upon those who followed them In 
goodness until the end of time. As for what follows... 

Numerous noble and great topics were mentioned to us from a questioner whose heart was filled with 
love for the religion and who was firmly established In Its adoration. And these questions became a 
great disaster, which some of the unwholesome groups of the Ummah (I.e. Islamic Nation) - those 
which are near to the groups of disbelief - fell Into. They divided their religion, which all goodness Is 
befitting to come from. Therefore, It Is a duty to answer these questions, purely from the Sunnah and 
the Book and to offer pure advice with the true religion, which Is the sound judgement In speech and 
decision. 



Referring to the Hadtth of 'Abd Allah ibn AbT Awfa, in which the Prophet, ^j ^^ iii J-f, said, "Do not wish to meet 

with the enemy, rather asl< Allah for pardoning. But if you do meet them, then be patient, and know that Paradise is 
beneath the shade of swords." - "Sahih al-Bukhari", (#2,818), (#2,965), and (#3,024) & "Sahih IVluslim", (#1,742) 

12 



THE FIRST QUESTION: 

[Muslims Emigrating to the Lands, Which Were Seized by the Enemy, in Order to Build up its 
Economy While it Remains in their Control] 

The questioner, may Allah preserve him and guard him, said: "What is your opinion, may Allah be 
pleased with you, regarding a country from the countries of the Muslims, which was conquered by 
Christian ^ combatants, or others besides them? What do you say about those from amongst the 
Muslims who move there and take up residence therein and become satisfied with its laws, which 
contradict the SharT'ah - in other words, the SharT'ah of Islam - while they love those countries, due to 
what they acquire through bringing supplies to it and they erect buildings therein, like they did in their 
(former)countries? So what do you say about them doing that and regarding their faith, O group of 
knowledgeable scholars? 

The Answer to the First Question: 

The Answer: This question includes numerous rulings. The first of them is the ruling of the country from 
the lands of Islam, which have been conquered by the disbelievers. And the great researcher, Ibn Hajar 
^verified in "At-Tuhfah" ^ and elsewhere, that it (i.e. that country) remains upon the ruling of Dar Islam, 
even if it is Dar Harb ^ in appearance, as it (remains) Dar Islam in the rulings, due to his, ^j a_U- iii J^, 
statement: 'Islam dominates and is not dominated.' " And due to His, s^, statement: 

^Verily, the earth belongs to Allah. He gives it as a heritage to whomever He M/;7/s.¥{AI-A'raf, 128) 



In his review of this translation, Shaykh Anwar al-Awlaki, may Allah preserve him, explained: "The Yemeni people 
used to refer to all the European people as 'Nasara' (i.e. Christians). Until this day many villagers still refer to them 
that way. This is important to note because the Shaykh is not referring to missionaries here but is referring to the 
Western colonial powers whether they were Christian, Jewish, or Secularists." 
^Referring to Shihab ad-DTn Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn 'AIT ibn Hajar al-Haytamt al-Makki (d. 974 H.) 
^Referring to the book by Ibn Hajar AI-HaytamT AI-MakkT entitled "Tuhfat al-Muhtaj bi-Sharh al-Minhaj". For this 
discussion within that book, look to Vol. 9/268-270. 

^The term "Dar Islam", or "Dar al-lslam", refers to the Islamic State whereas the term "Dar Kufr", or "Dar Harb", 
refers to the lands of disbelief which do not have any type of covenant with the Islamic State. 

This HadTth was narrated by Ad-DaraqutnT in his "Sunan", AI-BayhaqT, Ar-RuyanT in his "Musnad", and Adh-Dhiya' 
al-MaqdisT in "Al-Ahadtth al-Mukhtarah", all from 'A'ith ibn 'Amr al-Muzant. It was also narrated by At-TabaranT in 
"Al-Mu'jam as-Saghir", and AI-BayhaqT in "Dala'il an-Nubuwwah", both from 'Umar ibn al-Khattab. A third 
narration was narrated by Nahshal in "TarTkh Wasit" from Mu'ath ibn Jabal. All of these narrations are weak and 
defective, and are not strong enough to strengthen each other. There is a "Mawquf" narration from Ibn 'Abbas 
that is authentic to him, narrated by At-TahawT. All of these narrations have slight differences in wording or length 
of narration. [Look to "Irwa' al-GhalTI", Vol. 5/106, for a detailed discussion.] 

13 



And if it is Dar Islam, then it is obligatory and a duty upon the people of Islam to rescue it from the 
hands of the disbelievers by fightingthem, besieging them and putting pressure upon them, by all means 
possible. 

The second (ruling): The ruling of the one who moves to this existing country, which the people of 
Thimmah" have overtaken. So he is in disobedience, a Fasiq (wicked sinner) who is committing a major 
sin from the major sins, (even) if he is dissatisfied with the disbelief and its rulings. But if he is satisfied 
with them, then he is a disbelieving apostate, upon whom the rulings of the apostates are to be 
implemented. And it must be considered that what caused this Muslim to move away from Dar al-lslam, 
which is free from disbelievers, to the land which the disbelievers have seized - while openly displaying 
their disbelief therein and subjugated those in it with their Taghut-oriented, disbelieving laws - was 
nothing more than (their) deviation and love of this worldly life, which is the head of every sin.And 
also(love for) collecting its vanities, without paying any heed to the preservation of the religion along 
with an absence of anysense of honourconcerning the humiliation of the people of TawhTd along with 
love for being near the enemies of Allah instead of being near His allies. And we seek refuge in Allah, >. 
And Allah says: 

4Then after the remembrance sit not you in the company of those people who are the 
Thalimm(oppressors).^{M-An'am, 68) 

And He says: 

4fO ^ f ^ O 0^ ^v 

4Then sit not with them, until they engage in a talk other than that; (but if you stayed witti ttiem) 
certainly in that case you would be like t/)em.^(An-Nisa', 140) 

So contemplate. His, J^rj jf-, statement: '...certainly in that case you would be like them.' And this is the 

ruling of the one who originally resided near them. So what do you think about the ruling of the one 
who made the effort of moving near to them? So how could his misguidance, and the corruption of his 
religion, be doubted? And refuge is with Allah, >% Ibn Hajar said in his"AI-Fatawa HadTthiyyah" at his, Ju? 

^j u*. ill, statement: '/ disavow myself from every Muslim who resides amongst the polytheists.' 

They said, 'Why, O Messenger of Allah?' He said, 'The two fires should not see one another.' - 'The 
Hadith was narrated by Abu Dawud, At-TirmithT, and An-Nasa'T, and before them by Abu Bakr ibn AbT 
Shaybah,"with chains to Qays ibn Hazim, the great Tabi'T^^. So from them are those who narrated it as 
Mursal". And from them are those who narrated it as Musnad." 



Thimmah: the state of non-Muslim inhabitants within Dar al-lslam, who pay the tax in order to remain within 
that land. 

""Sunan AbT Dawud", Vol. 2/52 (#2,645), "Jami' at-Tirmithi", Vol. 4/155, and "As-Sunan al-Kubra", by An-Nasa'T, 
Vol. 4/229 (#6,982) 

14 



AI-BukharT said, 'And the Mursal is more correct.'^^And the meaning of the Hadith is that it is necessary 
upon the Muslim to tal<e his residence far from the domains of the polytheists, in other words, the 
HarbTs." And he must not reside in an area where, if a fire were set there, it would glow and the fire, 
which they set in their home, would be seen. Because whenever the two fires can be seen, then he is 
considered from them. And it has been established that migration is obligatory from Dar al-Harb, (as 
long as) its conditions (are present). And the attributing of the fires seeing one another is metaphorical 
coming from their (i.e. the Arabs) expression, 'My home looks at the home of so-and-so,' in other words, 
is across from it."^^ 

And Ibn Hajar, may Allah benefit us through him, was asked, about his,(i^j "tA*- m\ J^, statement: '/ 

disavow myself from every Muslim who resides amongst the polytheists.' They said, "Why?' He said, 
'Their two fires should not see one another.'So he answered with his statement: 'This is the rationale for 
the mentioning of the sight (between the two fires) but the expression of the rationale was omitted. 
And the connecting point between the cause and the effect is that by him residing amongst them, there 
is an increase in their numbers. And likewise, if they were targeted by a raiding army, the sight of the 
Muslim's fires alongside their fires might (inadvertently) prevent them (i.e. the Muslim army). Because 
when the armies would meet, the Arabs would know its size by seeing the fires, as it took place when 
they sent (people) to see his, ^j ^ k\ J^, army at Marr ath-Thahran, "when he headed towards 

Makkah to conquer it. Since there is this great danger in the Muslims residing amongst the polytheists, 
which is the prevention of the Muslims from attacking them, or not instilling terror within them, 
disavowal was established towards the ones living amongst them, due to their being a cause for not 
waging Jihad against them." - End quote. ^° 

Thirdly, the ruling upon bringing wealth to this land, reviving it, and erecting buildings within it. So is this 
anything other than clear misguidance, great corruption and being satisfied with the deeds of the 
polytheists? (This is) because, what is obligatory, approved of, and relied upon in the Shar'a (i.e. law) - 
with the likes of these seized lands - is resistance by the people of the land (i.e. the Muslims) towards 
the disbelievers. And (likewise) upon those who are within the distance of shortening (of the prayer) 
from it (i.e. that land). And whoever is further than that (i.e. shorting distance), then it is upon him to 
unite with the people of that area, with whatever amount suffices, if its people are insufficient (in 



Tabi't: The companion of a companion of the Messenger of Allah, ^j i^ iii J-^. Some said he only needs to have 
seen him, while others stipulate he must have accompanied him and narrated from him. [Look to "Al-Ba'ith al- 
Hathith Sharh Ikhtisar 'Ulum al-Hadith", Pg. 186.] 

Mursal: That which a Tabi'T narrates from the Messenger of Allah, ^j -U* iii J-f, without mentioning the 
companion whom he heard it from. Some said it is not limited to the Tabi'Tn, and others said it is only the major 
Tabi'in; not the minor ones. [Look to "Al-Ba'ith al-Hathith Sharh Ikhtisar 'Ulum al-Hadith", Pg. 45-47.] 

Musnad: Al-Hakim said, "It is that of which the chain is connected up to the Messenger of Allah, ^j "U* iii J~.o." 
[Look to "Al-Ba'ith al-Hathith Sharh Ikhtisar 'Ulum al-Hadith", Pg. 42.] 

" This ruling from AI-BukharT can be found in "Al-Badr al-Munir", Vol. 9/163, "Al-'llal al-Kabir", Vol. Pg. 264, and 
elsewhere. 

HarbTs: Citizens of Dar al-Harb (i.e. those who are not in a state of treaty with Dar al-lslam) 
^^ Look to "Al-Fatawa al-Hadithiyyah" Pg. 205. 

Marr ath-Thahran: A well-known valley which is sixteen miles outside of Makkah in the direction of Al-Madmah. 
Today it is known as the "Valley of Fatimah". 
^°Lookto "Al-Fatawa al-Hadithiyyah" Pg. 204. 

15 



number). And whoever is less than the distance of shortening, this one takes the ruling of the person of 
that land. - (From) the phrasing of "Al-Minhaj", with its explanation: "At-Tuhfah": 

"The second from the (two possible) situations of the disbelievers, is that they enter a land of ours, (so)it 
is a great calamity. Then it is upon its people to defend (themselves and their land) using whatever is 
possible from anything they have the ability to use. So if it is possible to prepare for fighting, then 
whatever is possible becomes obligatory; even upon the poor one, the child, the slave, the indebted 
one, and a woman who has strength. But if it is not possible to fight (collectively), then whoever from us 
who is targeted must defend himself with whatever he is able to. And whoever (resides in) less than the 
distance of shortening, from within the land - even if he is not from the people of Jihad - he is like its 
people (i.e. the people of that land), in this specific obligation of fighting. And whoever (resides) at the 
aforementioned distance, or beyond it, and whoever is further than them acting in defence of them and 
rescuing them; if they find provisions, weapons or riding beasts, then it is upon them to unite with the 
amount (of support) which suffices, if its people are insufficient (in number)." - End quote. ^^ 

So if what is obligatory regarding the Muslims is to resist the aforementioned disbelievers and to rescue 
those who are in it (i.e. that land) from the Muslims, and remove them (i.e. the invading occupiers) from 
there by waging war, besieging and applying severe pressure - as Allah ordered in His Book with His, ^ j^ 
jjii, statement: 



4Then kill the Mushrik?n(polytheists) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, 
and prepare for them each and every omfeus/j.)>{At-Tawbah, 5)- the verse... 

And this (verse) is regarding the disbelievers in their own land, so what is the ruling of those who seized 
our land, crushed the essence of our (Muslim) community, and permitted our sanctities, except for that 
(i.e. killing, capturing, besieging them and ambushing them)? Rather, they are even more deserving, 
more obligatory, and more befitting for that. So whoever makes the journey, draws together the ships 
and the cargo to this state and carries provisions andfabrics and replenishes its markets with stock and 
its roads with comings-and-goings, and erects buildings within it, and builds structures therein, then he 
has contradicted the SharT'ah of Muhammad and thrown away the divine covenants and has become 
satisfied with the rulings of Jahiliyyah (pre-lslamic ignorance). 



^Do they seek other than the religion of Allah, while to Him submitted all creatures in the heavens and 
the earth, willingly or unwillingly. And to Him shall they all be returned. ^{Al-'lmran, 83) 

This, plus the outward appearancefrom the text of the Qur'an, which are the definitive evidences, is the 
absence of faith for the one who forms allegiances with the disbelievers and allies himself to them in his 
matters instead of the Muslims; those who are supporters of the religion.And he is the one who is 



"Tuhfat al-Muhtaj bi-Sharh al-Minhaj", Vol. 9/235-236. The quote is not verbatim, as it is condensed from nearly 
two pages. 

16 



accountable for that - he who left Dar al-lslam, which was free from the disbelievers and traveled to a 
state, which wasconquered by disbelief and its leaders. He, j-.-, said: 



4You will not find any people who believe in Allah and the Last Day, making friendship with those who 
oppose Allah and His Messenger, even though they were their /ot/jers...^{AI-Mujadilah, 22)- 

theverse... 

And He, >, said: 

40 you who believe! Take not My enemies and your enemies (i.e. disbelievers and polytheists, etc.) as 
Awliya' (friends, protectors, tielpers, etc.), showing affection towards them, while they have 
disbelieved in what has come to you of the truth.. .^{Al-Mumtahinah, 1)- theverse... 

And He, >, said: 

40 you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Awliya'(friends, protectors, lielpers, etc.), 
they are but Awliya' to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as Awliya', then surely he is 
one o/t/)e/n...^{AI-Ma'idah, 51)- theverse... 

And He, >, said: 

4yerily, your Wall (Protector or Helper) is Allah, His Messenger, and the fce//evers...)>{AI-Ma'idah, 55) - 

theverse... 

And He, >, said: 

4p you who believe! Take not for Awliya' (protectors and helpers) those who take your religion for a 
mockery and fun from among those who received the Scripture (Jews and Christians) before you, nor 
from among the disbelievers; and fear Allah if you indeed are true believers.^ (Al-Ma'idah, 57)- 

theverse... 

And to other than these, from the noble verses, which eloquently declare the absence of faith, and the 
wickedness of those mentioned, and the announcement to them that theyare from them (i.e. a 

17 



disbelievers), from those who love the disbelievers. And is there any clarification after the clarification of 
Allah, >, or any ruling after His ruling? He, >, said: 

^And who is better in judgement than Allah. ..^{M-Ma'idah, 50)-theverse... 

And the love of our master, Hatib ibn AbT Balta'ah, which (the Surah) Al-Mumtahinah was revealed for, 
was nothing except for (him sending) the letter, which he wrote to the people of Makkah informingthem 
of the Messenger of Allah, ^j ^ m\ Juj, heading towards (them), despite the fact that he did not do so 

out of apostasy, nor out of being satisfied with disbelief after Islam. "And he was a participant at (the 
Battle of) Badr, according to agreement (of the scholars), yet that which was heard (i.e. those verses) 
were revealed for him. And He, ^~^, based the deterrent of allegiance to them, upon the fact that they 
disbelieved in what came to us from the truth. And is there any disbelief greater than the disbelief of the 
Ifranj? " And Ibn SirTn was once asked about a man who sells his home to a Christian who takes it as a 
monastery. So he recited: 

<^^ <UlJ ^ ^fj_ j^j^ 

■^And if any amongst you takes them as Awliya', then surely he is one of them.^ (Al-Ma'idah, 51)- 

theverse... 



Al-Bukharmarrated in his "Sahih", (#4,890), From AIT, "U* iii ^j, be pleased with him, who said, 'The Messenger 
of Allah,^j "^1* ^\ J-P, sent me, Az-Zubayr and Al-Miqdad somewhere saying, 'Pmceedtill you reach Rawdhat 
Khakh. There you will find a lady with a letter. Take the letter from her.' So, we set out and our horses ran at full 
pace till we got at Ar-Rawda where we found the lady and said (to her), 'Take out the letter.' She replied, 'I have no 
letter with me.' We said, 'Either you take out the letter or else we will take off your clothes.' So, she took it out of 
her braid. We brought the letter to the Prophet, ^j i^ iii J-^, and it contained a statement from Hatib ibn AbT 
Balta'ah to some of the people of the polytheists of Makkah informing them of some of the plans of the Prophet, 
^j <a* iiii J^. So the Prophet,^j "U* iii J-f, said, 'O Hatib, what is this?' Hatib replied, 'O Messenger of Allah, do 
not rush to judgment in my case. I was a man closely connected with the Quraysh, but I did not belong to their 
tribe,while the other emigrants with you, had their relatives in Makkah who would protect their families and 
wealth in Makkah. So, I wanted to recompense for my lacking blood relation to them by doing them a favour so 
that they might protect my relatives. I did not do that, while disbelieving nor while apostating from my religion.' 

And in a narration of Muslim: "And I did not do so while disbelieving, nor while apostating, nor while being pleased 
with disbelief (Kufr) after Islam." 

So the Prophet,^j i^ ^\ J-e, said, 'Verily, he has told you the truth.' Then Umar said, O Messenger of Allah, 
permit me to strike his neck." So he (i.e. the Prophet,^j "lA* iii J-f) said, 'Verily, he participated at Badr. And what 
informs you? Perhaps Allah, J^j j*, looked upon the people of Badr and said, 'Do as you wish, for I have forgiven 
you." Amr said, 'And for him, was revealed: O you who believe! Take not My enemies and your enemies as 
friends f/i\M//#Vd'^.(AI-Mumtahinah, 1) 

Ifranj: Literally "the Franks" and this was the name given to the people of Western Europe, due to their dominant 
presence amongst the Crusaders. 

18 



So then what about the ruling of the one who forms allegiances with them by bringing provisions, stock 
and wealth, which strengthens them and cements their force against Islam? And he who becomes 
subjugated to their dominance and becomes lowly to their strength and submits to their rulings; so how 
could he be labelled with the title of faith and Islam, after that, while he has surrendered to the rulings 
of disbelief? 

^Do they seek honour, power and glory with them? Verily, then to Allah belongs all honour, power 
and glory. )i> (An-Nisa', 139) 

And there is no power, nor strength, except with Allah - al-'AIT(the High), al-'AthTm (the Great). And He, 
>-, said: 

40 you who believe! Take not as (your) Bitdnah (advisors, consultants, protectors, helpers, friends, etc.) 
those outside your religion (pagans, Jews, Christians, and hypocrites) since they will not fail to do their 
best to corrupt you. They desire to harm you severely. Hatred has already appeared from their 
mouths...^ (Ai-'lmran, 118)-theverse... 

So the advisors are those who enter upon them, and the close friends, which you trust to take as scribes, 
guards, treasurers and confidants and other than these from the categories of advisors. He, aji^v-, based 
the forbiddance of that upon the fact that they love for us to be under hardship, while the hatred has 
become evident from their mouths and that which they hide within their chests is even greater. So they 
must never be honoured, after Allah has humiliated them, and they must never be drawn near after 
Allah has distanced them, as 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, -t* in ,^j, said.^" 

Because the end result of the Qur'an is to boycott the disbelievers from every aspect and opposing them 
from every condition, so that there remains no ties between them and us whatsoever. And Allah knows 
best. 



This narration from 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, "U* iii ^^j, was narrated by AI-BayhaqT in "As-Sunan al-Kubra", Vol. 
10/127 (#20,196) from 'lyadh ibn Ghanam al-Ash'ari, that Abu Musa al-Ash'art travelled to 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, 
u.^ iiii ^j, while he had a Christian scribe with him. So 'Umar was amazed by what he saw from his memorization, 
so he said, 'Tell your scribe to read a letter for us.' He said, 'He is a Christian who may not enter the Masjid.' So 
'Umar reprimanded him and caused him to be worried, and said, "Do not honour them, while Allah has disgraced 
them. And do not bring them close, while Allah has distanced them. And do not trust them while Allah, Jrj j*, has 
declared them to be treacherous." He also narrated a second longer narration, in which 'Umar, "up iiii ^j, recited 

the 51^ verse from Surat al-Ma'idah. AI-AlbanT declared the first narration "Sahth", and the second "Hasan". [Look 
to "Irwa' al-GhalTI FTTakhrTj Ahadith Manar as-Sabil", Vol. 8/255-256, (#2630)] 

19 



THE SECOND QUESTION: 

[The Muslim Who Claims to be From the Community of the Christians and Identifies Himself 
with Their Flags etc.] 

The questioner asks: "And likewise there are a people from the Muslims within the countries of Islam 
who claim that they are from the 'subjects of the Christians' ^^ and they are satisfied with that and 
happy with it. So what do you say about their faith? And in general, they place banners upon their ships 
and they are called 'flags', such as the flags of the Christians as a means for them to show that they are 
from their subjects." 

The Answer to the Second Question: 

The answer - and Allah,>j ajIjv- - is the One responsible for preserving the religion of Islam for us: 

Those people have had the love of the Christians fill their hearts and they reflect upon the greatness of 
their wealth and their strengthand they noticed the abundance of worldly things in their hands - which 
is their share from this worldly life and the hereafter - and they had their sights shortened to (merely) 
building up this worldly life and collecting it (i.e. wealth etc.) and that the Christians are more suitedto 
preserve it and safeguard it. So if those aforementioned people are ignorant ones who believe in the 
exalted nature of the religion of Islam and its highness over the rest of the religions, and that its rulings 
are the most befitting rulings, and in their hearts there is no glorification of disbelief and its leaders 
along with that, then they remain upon the rulings of Islam. However, they are sinful ones who are 
committing dangerous things, due to which they are to be punished, disciplined and given an exemplary 
form of punishment. But if they are knowledgeable regarding the rulings of Islam, yet despite that they 
performed what was previously mentioned, then they are to be given the opportunity to repent (i.e. 
return to Islam). Then if they turn back from that (action), repenting to Allah, >, (they are left 
alone),otherwise they leave (Islam). So if they believe in the glorification of disbelief, then they have 
apostated, and the rulings of the apostates are to be implemented upon them. And the outward 
appearance of the verses and the HadTth, is the absence of faith for those mentioned. He, s^, said: 

\ j^l jA ^^y^_ OjPUaJl j^AjUjI Ij^T jjOJIj j^i J\ pUihJl ja ^_f^. \}:J>\ jJOJi Jj <lU!|> 



In his review of this translation, Shaykh Anwar al-Awlaki, may Allah preserve him, explained: "Subjects of the 
Christians: This would be referring to people from Aden referring to themselves as British subjects and who would 
raise the British flag on their ships. Again 'Christians' is the term used by Yemeni's to refer to all Europeans." 



20 



4Allah is the Walt (Protector or Guardian) oftliose who believe. He brings them out from darkness into 
light. But as for those who disbelieve, their Awliya'(supporters and helpers) are Taghut [false deities 
and false leaders, etc.], they bring them out from light into dar^/7ess.)>(AI-Baqarah, 257) 

So the verse necessitates that the people are two categories; those who believed - their ally is Allah, > - 
in other words, none other than Him. So they have no Helper besides Allah and His Messenger. Allah is 
our Helper and you have no Helper!^^ And those who disbelieved - their alliesare the Taghut. Therefore, 
there is no middle (ground). So whoever takes the Taghut as an ally, instead of Allah, then he has lost, 
with a clear loss, and performed a grievous error. So there is nothing but the ally of Allah or the ally of 
the Taghut. So there is no overlapping in any point, from the points, whatsoever, as the verse 
necessitates. 

And He, js said: 

^But no, by your Lord, they can have no Faith, until they make you (0 Muhammad) judge in all 
disputes between them, and find in themselves no resistance against your decisions, and accept 
(them) with full submission.^{fi<n-N\sa', 65) 

And Allah has judged that we must never form allegiances with the disbelievers in any way. So whoever 
contradicts that which He has judged, then how could he have faith, while Allah has negated his faith, 
and affirmed the negation in the strongest terms, and swore an oath upon that? So understand that. 

And Abu Dawud narrated from Ibn 'Umar, u^ m\ ^j, "and At-TabaranT in "Al-Awsat", ^^from 

Huthayfah,'ti*' iii ^^y. 'Whoever imitates a people, then he is from them.' So the HadTth is a deterrent 

from imitating the disbelievers. (This includes) whoever raises banners and other than that, from the 
means of imitating, such as the type of clothing, walking, moving or remaining still. Because the Prophet, 
(Jl-.j aJj. ill J^, contradicted the Jews and ordered us to contradict them in everything they do. And 

likewise (to contradict) the Majus (Magians) and the Christians in their outward religious symbols, 
clothing, celebrations, fasting, and all of their descriptions, in order to be different from them and to 
dissatisfy them. And due to his, f-^^, i-^^ ^'s, statement: 'Do not be illuminated by the fire of the 
Po/yfhe/sts.'^^And the forbiddance of living with them, learning their writing, joining with them in their 
celebrations and their gathering areas, learning their gibberish and other than that, was narrated from 



Referring to the statement of the Messenger of Allah, ^j i^ iii J^, on the day the Muslims were defeated in 
the Battle of Uhud, when the polytheists shouted to them: "Al-'Uzza (i.e. an idol) is ours but you have no 'Uzza." 
And the Prophet, ^j "U* ^\ J-p, said: "Why do you not reply?' But the companions asked: "O Messenger of Allah, 
what shall we say?" He, ^j tAt k\ J^, said: "Say: 'Allah is our Helper, but you have no Helper!" - Narrated by Al- 
Bukhariin his "Sahih", (#3,039) and (#4,043), from Al-Bara' ibn 'Azib. 
""Sunan Abi Dawud", Vol. 2/441, (#4,031) 
^*"AI-Mu'jam al-Awsat", Vol. 8/179, (#8,327) 

This HadTth was narrated by Ahmad in his "Musnad" and An-Nasa'T in "As-Sunan al-Kubra", from Anas ibn Malik. 
It was declared "Dha'if" by AI-AlbanT in "Dha'Tf an-Nasa'T", (#5,224) and "Dha'Tf al-Jami' as-Saghir", (#6,227) 

21 



our master, 'Umar Ibn al-Khattab, ^^ k\ ^j. ^°So whoever imitates them, out of love for them, and 
becomes satisfied with their disbelief, then he is a disbeliever. And whoever does so, while heedless of 
this intention, then he has imitated them in their matters of Jahiliyyah, and there is a characteristic from 
their characteristics within him. (And) repentance(i.e. returning to Islam) is necessary for him along with 
the established conditions of repentance in such a situation. Ibn Taymiyyah said, "The HadTth: 'Whoever 
imitates a people, tlien lie is from tliem,' the least of its conditions is that it necessitates the forbiddance 
of imitating them even if its outward appearance necessitates the disbelief of the one imitating,as in His, 
>, statement: 

(♦^^ <*^j^~ iyjf 

^And if any amongst you takes them as Awliya', then surely he is one of t/jem.^(AI-Ma'idah, 51) 

And it is equivalent to the statement of Ibn 'Umar:^^'Whoever builds in the lands of the Polytheists, 
participates in their Nayruz (festival),^^ and their Mahrajan (festival),^^ or imitates them until he dies, 
then he will be raised up with them on the Day of Resurrection.'^^So this has beenunderstoodas 
referring to the complete imitation, as doing so necessitates disbelief and necessitates the forbiddance 
of (any)of its (individual) components. Or it could be understood (as referring to) whatever amount he 
took part in imitated them. So if it is disbelief, disobedience or an outward religious symbol, then his 
ruling is likewise (one of these three categories)." - end quote. ^^ 



From 'Umar, "U* iiii ^j, that he said, "Do not learn the gibberish of the non-Arabs. And do not enter upon the 
polytheists in their churches on the day of their celebration, as the Anger (of Allah) descends upon them." - 
Narrated by 'Abd Ar-Razzaq in "Al-Musannaf", (#1,609), and AI-BayhaqT in "As-Sunan al-Kubra", Vol. 9/234 
(#18,640). This narration was declared "Sahih" by Ibn Taymiyyah in "Iqtidha' as-Sirat al-Mustaqim", Vol. 1/511, and 
in "Majmu' al-Fatawa", Vol. 25/173-174, by "Ibn Al-Qayyim in "Ahkam Ahl ath-Thimmah", Vol. 3/1247, by Ibn 
Muflih in "Al-Adab ash-Shar'iyyah", Vol. 3/417 and by Ibn Kathir in "Musnad al-Faruq", Vol. 2/494. 

In the actual quote from Ibn Taymiyyah, it states 'Abd Allah ibn 'Amr, and elsewhere in the book, it states 'Abd 
Allah ibn 'Amr ibn al-'As. 

Nayruz: The Arabic pronunciation of Nawruz, which is a celebration of the Majus (Magians), which takes place on 
the Spring Equinox, and marks the beginning of their New Year. 

Mahrajan: The second festival of the Majus (Magians) after Nayruz. It is six days long, and it culminates on the 
sixth day of their month of "Mahr". Look to "Mu'jam al-Manahi al-Lafthiyyah", Pg. 533, by Shaykh Bakr ibn 'Abd 
Allah Abu Zayd, may Allah be merciful to him. 

On page 233, Ibn Taymiyyah mentioned this narration, with the word "A'ajim" (non-Arabs) instead of "Mushriktn 
(polytheists)". He also mentioned that it was narrated by AI-BayhaqT and authenticated its chain of narration. 
^^ Look to "Iqtidha' as-Sirat al-Mustaqim", Pg. 116. 

22 



THE THIRD QUESTION: 

[The Ruling Upon the Muslim Who Attributes Justice to the Christians and Approves of Their 
Authority and Scoffs at the Muslim Authority and their Leadership] 

The questioner asked: "And what do you say regarding those who praise them and say that they are 
people of justice who love justice and along with this, he frequently praises them in the sittings and he 
scoffs at anyone mentioning Muslims being in authority and he attributes justice to the disbelievers and 
the absence of any transgression (on their part)?" 

The Answer to the Third Question: 

The answer: As for the ruling upon the one who praises them, then he is a disobeying transgressor, who 
is committing a major sin. Repentance is obligatory upon him from that (sin) as well as regret, because 
of it. This is if his praise was only for the disbelievers themselves without mentioning the characteristic 
of disbelief, which is within them. But if he did praise them regarding the characteristic of disbelief, then 
he is a disbeliever, because it is as if he praised the disbelief (itself), which all of the legislations have 
made blameworthy. And the Messenger of Allah,(jL-ij ii* iii J^, warned against a Muslim praising 
something the individual is not aware of, as he, f^ui, »Lji ->, said when he heard a group of people praising 
an individual: 'You have severed the man's nec/c/in other words: 'destroyed him.'^^ As for (generally) 
praising justice, which would include endorsement of the one who is before a judge, or in relating his 
description (i.e. "He is a just man."), then it is permitted; furthermore, it could (even) be obligatory. But 
(generally), the Muslim praising a transgressor is a (form of) disobedience, due to the HadTth: "If the 
oppressor is praised, Allah, Jrj j*, becomes angry." So if that is regarding the minor oppression (i.e. 
cruelty etc.), then what do you think about the major oppression (i.e. disbelief and polytheism)? 

And in a HadTth, which was narrated by Abu Ya'la and AI-BayhaqT, ^^from Anas, and Ibn 'AdT ^^- from 
Buraydah: "If the transgressor is praised, the Lord becomes angry and the Throne shakes, due to that." 
And the outcome is that praising the disbelievers, due to their disbelief (itself), is (considered) apostasy 
from Islam, but praising them without this intention is a major sin; the one who commits it is to be 
disciplined with whatever would be a deterrent for him. As for the one who says that they are a people 
of justice, then if by 'justice' he means the matters of disbelief, which includes their rules of law, then he 



^^This HadTth was narrated by AI-BukharT in his "SahTh", (#2,663) and (#6,060), as well as Muslim in his "Sahih", 
(#3,001). The phrase they narrated was "You have destroyed,' - or (the narrator speculated): 'severedthe man's 
back." - Both from Abu Musa al-Ash'ari. 

^^AI-BayhaqT in "Al-Jami' li-Shu'ab al-Tman", Vol. 6/511 (#4,544). AI-AlbanT mentioned that he did not find It in 
"Musnad AbT Ya'la", and that it must be in his "Al-Musnad al-Kabir", as Ibn Hajar attributed it to there in "Al- 
Matallb al-'Aliyah", Vol. 3/3. This HadTth was declared "Munkar" by AI-AlbanT in "Silsilat al-AhadTth adh-Dha'Tfah", 
(#595) and "Mawdhu"' by him as well, (#1,399). 

^^Ibn 'AdT narrated it in "Al-Kamil Fidh-Dhu'afa'", Vol. 5/1917, but without mention of 'the Throne'. This HadTth was 
declared "Dha'Tf" by AI-AlbanT in "Dha'Tf al-Jami as-SaghTr", (#694). He also indicated this in "Silsilat al-AhadTth adh- 
Dha'Tfah", (#1,399). 

23 



has disbelieved. And Allah, j-., .^^,has reprimanded that, vilified it, called it 'tyranny', 'stubbornness', 
'transgression', 'a clear lie and sin', 'a clear loss', and 'a falsehood'. And the justice is only the SharT'ah of 
Allah, which He compiled within His Book and the Sunnah of His Prophet, as Allah orders justice. So if 
the rulings of the Christians were (considered) 'just', then they (i.e. those rulings) would have been 
commanded(to be implemented), and that would have necessitated (that Islam was) contradictory and 
in opposition (to itself) regarding its refutation of the Christians. He, >, said: 

■^^o they then seek the judgement of (the Days of) Ignorance? And who is better in judgement than 
Allah for a people who have firm fo/t/).)>{AI-Ma'idah, 50)^^ 

So the ruling of Allah,Jjrj j*, is the best justice and nothing else is. So how could it (i.e. the characteristic 

of justice) be for the rule of the Christians, because every (form of) justice is good.Therefore, the claim 
of those mentioned, becomes invalid. And He, >, said: 

4They wish to go for judgement (in their disputes) to the Taghut (false judges, etc.) while they have 
been ordered to reject them.^ (An-Nisa', 60)"^° 

So those ones labelled what Allah, >-, ordered them to disbelieve in, as 'justice', so they have exceeded 
in their misguidance. And the Shaytan wants to lead them far astray into misguidance. But if he meant 
by that (i.e. 'justice') the metaphorical justice, which is the building up of this worldly life by abandoning 
oppression, which destroys this worldly life, then disbelief is not necessitated by that. But he should be 
discouraged from that (expression), with a great deterrent. As for what is narrated from him, j»*>LJi ^U*: '/ 

was born during the reign of the just one,Anu Shirwan.' '^Hhen he, f':L^\ •ui*, meant by that, the 
metaphorical justice. Especially when the King who was mentioned, was during a time of Fatrah, "^ as is 



In our manuscript of "As-Sayf al-Battar", by 'Abd Allah al-Ahdal, the verse is referred to as Al-Ma'idah, 55 
whereas it is actually verse #50, so we changed the reference above to reflect that. 

Similarly, in our manuscript, this verse was referred to as Al-Ma'idah, 60 whereas it is actually Surat an-Nisa', 60. 
So we changed the reference above to reflect that. 

This is the Kisra the First or Khosrau the First. He was known as "Anushiravan the Just". AI-BayhaqT stated, 
referring to AI-HulaymT: "And he spoke about the falseness of that which some of the ignorant ones narrated from 
our Prophet, ^j "U* iii J-^, 'I was born in the time of the just king,' meaning, Anu Shirwan. And our Shaykh Abu 
'Abd Allah al-Hafith also spoke about the falseness of this HadTth. Then some of the righteous ones saw the 
Messenger of Allah, n-L-j 4^1* iii J.^, while sleeping, so he told him that which Abu 'Abd Allah, so he declared him 
truthful in declaring this HadTth to be a lie and to be false, and he said, 'I did not say this at all.'" [Look to "Al-Jami' 
li-Shu'ab al-Tman", Vol. 7/167.] And AI-AlbanT mentioned that it is: "False. It has no origin." [Look to "Silsilat al- 
Ahadith adh-Dha'Tfah", (#2,095)] 

Fatrah: The period of time between the passing away of one Messenger to the arrival of the next one. 

24 



well-known. Along with the fact that the aforementioned HadTth has no origin, as Ibn Hajar mentioned 
in 'An-Ni'mah al-Kubra.'"^ 

He said: "And labelling him with 'the Just One', assuming its narration (was even authentic), was to 
describe him with the title, which he was called by; not to testify to that (quality) on his behalf, as he 
used to rule by other than the rule of Allah." 

"As-SakhawT said, 'The aforementioned HadTth was fabricated, and had it been authentic, then there 
would be no problem in his labelling him with justice, as he was not a tyrannical ruler over his subjects, 
nor did he used to oppress them in the rights of this worldly life. So his 'justice' in regards to that does 
not negatehis disbelief and his oppression towards himself, through his ignorance. And Allah knows 
best."- End quote. "" 

As for the one who belittles the Sultan, then sufficient for him as an admonition and a deterrent is the 
HadTth: "Verily, the Sultan is only the shade of Allah and His spear on the Earth." - Narrated by Al- 
BayhaqT from Anas. *^And the HadTth: "The Sultan is the shade of Allah on His Earth, so whoever honours 
him, Allah will honour him. And whoever belittles him, then Allah will belittle him." - Narrated by At- 
TabaranT and AI-BayhaqT from Abu Bakrah. *^And the HadTth: "The Sultan is the shade of Allah upon the 
Earth. Every oppressed one from His slaves seeks refuge with him. So if he is just, he has the rewards and 
it is upon the subjects to be grateful. And if he is tyrannical or persecutes (others), then the burden is 
upon himself and it is upon the subjects to be patient." - Narrated by AI-HakTm and Al-Bazzar from Ibn 
'Umar. ^^And the HadTth: "The Sultan is the shade of Allah upon the Earth. The weak one seeks refuge 
with him and through him the oppressed one seeks assistance. And whoever honours the Sultan of Allah 
in this worldly life, Allah will honour him on the Day of Resurrection." - Narrated by AI-BukharT from Abu 
Hurayrah. ^^And there are others besides these from the numerous HadTth and narrations concerning 
the virtues of the Sultan, having love for him and forbidding the slandering of him. 

And entire books have been written specifically about that, so whoever belittles the Sultan and raises 
the status of disbelief and its leaders, Allah will belittle him. 



" Referring to the book "Itmam an-Ni'matul-Kubra 'Alal-Alam Bi-Mawlidi Sayyidi Waladi Adam" 

"''Look to "Al-Maqasid al-Hasanah FTBayani Kathirin Min al-Ahadith al-Mushtaharah", (#531) and (#532). 

''^Narrated by Al-Bayhaqi in "As-Sunan al-Kubra", Vol. 8/162 (#16,427), in "Al-Jami' li-Shu'ab al-Tman", Vol. 9/480 

(#6,990). It was declared "Dha'Tf" by As-SakhawT in "Al-Maqasid al-Hasanah", (#132), and AI-AlbanT in "Silsilat al- 

Ahadith adh-Dha'Tfah", (#2,504) 

"^Narrated by AI-BayhaqT in "Al-Jami' li-Shu'ab al-Tman", Vol. 9/478-479 (#6,988). Also narrated by Ibn AbT 'Asim in 

"Kitab as-Sunnah", (#1,049). It was declared "Dha'Tf" by AI-AlbanT in "Silsilat al-AhadTth adh-Dha'Tfah", (#1,662) and 

in "Dha'Tf al-Jami' as-SaghTr", (#3,350). The last sentence of the HadTth is was declared "Hasan" due to its 

strengthening factors, as was mentioned by AI-AlbanT in "Silsilat al-AhadTth as-SahThah", (#2,297) 

''^Referring to AI-HakTm at-TirmithT in "Nawadir al-Usul Min AhadTth ar-Rasul", under "The 275"" Fundamental". It 

was also narrated by Ibn 'AdT in "Al-Kamil Fidh-Dhu'afa'", Vol. 1/175, and others. It was declared rejected by Ibn 

'AdTin "Al-Kamil Fidh-Dhu'afa'", Vol. 1/175, al-BayhaqTin "al-Jami' Li-Shu'ab al-Tman", Vol. 9/475-476 (#6,984), Ibn 

al-QaysaranT in "ThakhTrat al-Huffath", Vol. 3/1492, al-Hafith al-'IraqT in his verification of "Ihya' 'Ulum ad-DTn", Vol. 

4/121, and many others. 

"^Narrated by Abu Muhammad ibn Yusuf, Vol. 1/143. It was declared "Dha'Tf" by al-AlbanT in "Silsilat al-AhadTth 

adh-Dha'Tfah", (#1,663) and in "Dha'Tf al-Jami' as-SaghTr", (#3,352). 

25 



^And whomsoever Allah disgraces, none can honour /j;m,^{AI-Hajj, 18) 

So if he belittles the Sultan, due to his (i.e. the Sultan's) preserving Islam and praises the Christians due 
to their preserving disbelief, then he disbelieves and he has become an apostate. But if he praises (them) 
due to their preservation of this worldly life,rectifying it, and protecting the subjects from wrong-doings 
and spending money to establish the worldly systems and the honour of the subjects (of their state). So 
if he attributes shortcomings to the Sultan,but to the Christians (he attributes) the establishment of all 
of that, then the one referred to as the praiser, is from those who have been overcome by the love of 
this current, worldly abode instead of the afterlife. And his heart has been filled with love of thevanities 
of this world, and his objective deviated far from holding the nature of Islam in high regard. So he has 
become deceived by his worldly life and he has been thrown into trials by his love of this current, 
worldly abode. 

^Whosoever desires (with tiis deeds) the reward of the Hereafter, We give him increase in his reward, 
and whosoever desires the reward of this world (with his deeds). We give him thereof (what is written 
for him), and he has no portion in the Hereo/^er.^(Ash-Shura, 20) 

So the aforementioned 'deceived one' did not realize - because of his ignorance, his foolishness, his 
dimness and his stupidity - that the preservation of this worldly life, which took place for the Christian 
subjects, resulted in the loss of multiple shares of his religion. Rather, it could have even taken him to 
the eradication of his entire religion. Because, due to the intermingling with the aforementioned 
disbelievers, he became blinded by their misguided temptations and personal interactions with one 
another. So he participated in usury and witnessed (the consumption of) alcohol and pork and he heard 
'the third of three' (i.e. the false belief in the Trinity of the Christians) and became negligent regarding 
the prayers in order to fit in. And he saw fornication and overheard vulgarity and he persisted in that 
until he became accustomed to it.And it reached the point where he no longer objects to it at all, and 
possibly after lengthy persistence, he would even believe in its permissibility, due to the overwhelming 
ignorance. So he was denied his religion by the way in which he achieved his worldly life (i.e. the 
benefits). This is because, this worldly life and the hereafter are (like) two co-wives who harm each 
other and don't get along with each other, and the Sultan is the shade of Allah upon His Earth. So in any 
case, he (i.e. the Sultan) is to be appreciated and left alone, and Allah, <ui;v-, will support the religion 

through him. And if he is a wicked man, then his wickedness is (limited) to himself. As for the Sultan of 
this time, then he - praise be to Allah - is a wrath against the disbelievers. May AI-IVlalik(The King, i.e. 
Allah),AI-Jabbar, (The Irresistible; The Compeller, i.e. Allah)grant him victory. 

Amin. 



26 



And in "Ar-Rawdhah an-Nawawiyyah" in the chapter of Apostasy, we find what was phrased as: "And if a 
children's teacher said, 'The Jews are better than the Muslims by far, because they fulfil the rights of 
their children's teachers,' he disbelieves." - End Quote."^ 



"^"Rawdhat at-Talibm", Vol. 7/288 



27 



THE FOURTH QUESTION: 

[The Ruling Upon the Muslim Who Ships Goods and Supplies to the Christian Lands and the 
Ruling Upon Another Muslim Who Kills Him for Doing That] 

The questioner asks: "And what is your opinion regarding the one who transports goods or food to the 
countries of the Christians and a Muslim objects or forbids him, but he does not stop? If he kills him, or 
takes his wealth, is his blood lawful and his wealth permitted, or not? And the intention of the killer is to 
destroy the states of the disbelievers and the intention of the murdered, is to revive them with what he 
sends to them. And what is the ruling of this transgressor(i.e. the one transporting the goods) if he is 
killed? Is he a martyr, or not? And what is the ruling of those who assist them in that from the 
Muslims?" 

Answer to the Fourth Question: 

The Answer: The country of the Christians cannot be except (the first scenario): it was either originally 
in their hands, such as the land of Ash-Sham, and Iraq, which was in the hands of the disbelievers during 
the time of the Prophet, ^j ^ iii J-fi. So there is no ambiguity regarding the permissibility of 

transporting goods,such as food and other than that, to them. And the permissibility of trade within 
their countries and the permissibility of interacting with them (is likewise clearly permissible),because 
that (i.e. trade etc.) is from the necessities of living and the need calls for that. So the Legislator (i.e. 
Allah) permitted that, due to the need. This is because, the Sahabah,(»^ ^\ ^), used to enter the land 
of polytheism for (the purpose of) interactions (i.e. business dealings etc.) and the Prophet, ^^ iii J-e 
(►JL-.J, entered as a (trade)speculator on behalf of (his future wife,) KhadTjah,^;* "iiii ^y So the likes of 

that are not to be condemned for the one who does so. And he must not be challenged at all, and 
whoever intercepts him along the path is a combatant, highway robber, upon whom the rulings of the 
highway (robber) are to be implemented. And the one who is killed - if he is the robber - then his 
(killing) is permissible as long as he was repelled by the least (possible means), and then the more (harsh 
means, if necessary). But if he (i.e. the one trading with the Christian lands) wasthe one travelling along 
the path, then he was the oppressed one who is martyred according to the minor (form of) martyrdom, 
due to the HadTth: '\Nhoe\ier is killed in defence of his wealth, then he is a martyr.' ^° 

Or else (the second scenario) is that it (i.e. that land which the Muslim is trading with) was Dar Islam, 
which the disbelievers conquered and it was obligatory upon us to oppose them and rescue it from their 
hands. So the one transporting goods and provisions to them is a disobeyer towards Allah and His 
Messenger, and committing a major sin, so he is to be deterred from that. But if he does not become 
deterred, then the ruler or those in charge from the Muslims, are to discipline him. Even if that takes 
place by imprisoning him or preventing him from travelling to it (i.e. that conquered Muslim land). But if 



^"Narrated by AI-BukharT in his "Sahih", (#2,480), and Muslim and his "Sahih", (#141), both from 'Abd Allah ibn 
'Amr ibn al-'As, u.^ iiii ^^^. 

28 



he does not cease, then it is allowed to send back his goods along the path, as a means to besiege the 
disbelievers, but it remains the property of its owner. And it is not allowed to kill him, rather he is 
prevented from that (trade) with what is best and does not lead to any harm. And whoever assists him 
in that (trade), then he is his partner in that sin, whether his assistance takes the form of words or 
actions, due to the HadTth: "\Nhoe\ier assists an oppressor, Allah will put him (i.e. the oppressor) in 
authority over him (i.e. the one who assists him)."^^- Narrated by Ibn 'Asakir, from Ibn Mas'ud. And the 
HadTth: "Whoever assists an oppressor, in order to deny a right through his oppression, then the 
protection of Allah, and the protection of His Messenger are disavowed from him." - Narrated by Al- 
Hakim, from Ibn 'Umar,U4* ^\ sr^J-" 



"look to "Tarikh Dimashq", Vol. 34/4. This HadTth was declared "Mawdhu' (i.e. fabricated)" by AI-AlbanT in "Silsilat 
al-AhadTth adh-Dha'Tfah", (#1,937) Vol. 4/412. The same defect was mentioned by Mulla 'AIT Al-Qari' in "Al-Asrar al- 
Marfu'ah", 316, and by Muhammad ibn Muhammad al-GhazzT in "Itqan Ma Yuhsin", 2/559, and by Ash-ShawkanT 
in "Al-Fawa'id al-Majmu'ah", 211. 

""Al-Mustadrak 'Alas-SahThayn", Vol. 4/199-200, (#7,131), with the phrase "Whoever assists a falsehood...". 
Defects were mentioned by Ath-ThahabT in his follow-up upon Al-Hakim's grading, as well as Ibn 'Asakir after 
narrating this HadTth in "TarTkh Dimashq", Vol. 15/315. The phrasing mentioned by this author was narrated by At- 
TabaranT in "Al-Mu'jam al-KabTr", Vol. (#11,216) and (#11,539) from Ibn 'Abbas, u^ iii ^j. 

29 



THE FIFTH QUESTION: 

[The Ruling Upon the Muslims Who Remain Inside the Country, Which was Seized and 
Occupied by Foreign Invaders, and Subsequently Fall Under Their Rule] 

The questioner asked: "And what is your opinion regarding an area, which the disbelievers overtook, 
while within it there are Muslims who are residing there with their wealth and their children? Is it 
allowed for them to live within this country of theirs, which has been overtaken, or not? And since they 
are not satisfied with that (situation), andthey hate those disbelievers,yet they see that their remaining 
in their country is like a necessity,are they safe from sin? And how is their faith? Is it complete, lacking, 
or fluctuating? And along with that, if fighting them(i.e. the disbelieving occupiers) is resolved upon (by 
the leadership in Dar Islam), they (i.e. the Muslim residents within that occupied state) do not see any 
need for themselves to strive (along with the advancing troops). And what is your opinion of them and 
of those who love them, and those who hate them, from those ones? And (what is the ruling upon) 
those who follow their orders, while they know that their ruling is contrary to the SharT'ah of Islam? And 
what is the ruling upon the one who resides therein, if he is ruled upon with other than the Islamic 
SharT'ah; and instead (he is ruled upon), with the law of disbelief? Should he obey, remain satisfied and 
continue to live there, or (should he) disobey and emigrate? 

The Answer to the Fifth Question: 

The Answer: The ruling of that becomes known from what we will relate to you from the words of our 
scholars, may Allah, >, be merciful to them. He (i.e. Ibn Hajar) said in "Al-Minhaj" and its explanation 
"At-Tuhfah",^^ as follows: "A Muslim lives in Dar Kufr, in other words 'Harb', and it appears (to us) that 
Dar Islam which they conquered is the same (in its ruling); if he is able to openly display his religion, and 
he is not hopeful that Islam will prevail, then emigration to Dar al-lslam becomes recommended for him, 
so that he will not increase their numbers and because they might otherwise plot against him. Yet,that is 
not obligatory, due to his ability to openly display his religion. And it (i.e. emigration) is not forbidden, 
because from the characteristics of the Muslim amongst them (i.e. the disbelievers), is dominance and 
overpowering, as opposed to inability. And from there, if he hopes for the prevailing of Islam by his 
residing there, then his residing there is better. But if he is able to resist and seclude himself and does 
not see the victory of the Muslims as likely through his emigrating, then his residing there becomes 
obligatory because his area is Dar Islam, but if he emigrates it would become Dar Harb. Then if he is able 
to fight them and invite them to Islam, it is obligatory, otherwise it isnot. And what seems apparent, is 
that it is impossible for this Dar to return to Dar Harb - in other words, 'Kufr' - even if they conquer it, 
as the authentic narration clearly stated: 'Islam dominates and is not dominated. '^"^So their saying that it 
became Dar Harb, what is meant by that is it became that way in appearance but not in ruling. ^^But if it 



"For this discussion look to "Tuhfat al-Muhtaj bi-Sharh al-Minhaj", Vol. 9/268-270. 
^ Look to footnote #8. 

The topic of the ruling upon the state itself and when Dar al-lslam reverts to Dar al-Kufr or Harb is a subject 
wherein there are differences of opinion on the conditions that classify a state as Dar Harb or Dar Islam. The 
majority of the scholars have stated that Dar al-lslam can only be considered such when the rulings of the Islamic 

30 



is not possible for him to openly display his religion, or he fears tribulations regarding his religion, 
emigration becomes obligatory if he is able, and he would be sinful by remaining. But if he is unable to 
(emigrate), then he is excused, due to His, j^., statement: 

^Verily! As for those whom the angels take (in death) while they are wronging themselves (as they 
stayed among the disbelievers even though emigration was obligatory for them).^(An-N'\sa' , 97) - the 
verse. 

And due to the authentic narration: 'Hijrah, does not cease so long as the disbelievers are fought."^^ — 
End quote. 



SharT'ah are implemented therein and if those rulings are replaced with anything else, then that state is considered 
Dar al-Kufr or Harb. Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah be merciful to him, stated, "The majority have stated that Dar 
al-lslam is that which the Muslims have arrived in and in which the rulings of Islam have been implemented. And 
that upon which the rulings of Islam have not been implemented is not Dar Al-lslam, even if it is attached to it,as 
At-Ta'if was very close to Makkah, yet it did not become Dar al-lslam with the Conquest of Makkah." "Ahkam Ahl 
ath-Thimmah", by Ibn Al-Qayyim, Vol. 1/366, Pub. "Dar Al-'llm Lil-Malaym", 1983 [Also look to "Bada'i' As-Sana'i'", 
by AI-KasanT, Vol. 9/4375, "AI-MughnT", by Ibn Qudamah, Vol. 12/283-284 and "Al-Mabsut" by As-SarkhasT, Vol. 
10/114] 

Abu Hantfah, may Allah be merciful to him, differed in what would make a state Dar al-Kufr or Harb, as it was 
narrated from him by Imam Ibn Qudamah al-HanbalT, who said: "And Abu HanTfah said, 'It does not become Dar 
Harbunless three things are combined therein: (1) It must neighbor Dar al-Harbwhere there is nothing between it 
and Dar al-lslam. (2) The second: That there is no Muslim, nor ThimmT (non-Muslim tribute payer) who is safe 
within it. (3) The third: That their rulings are implemented within it." - "AI-MughnT", Vol. 12/284, and look to "Al- 
Mabsut" by As-SarkhasT, Vol. 10/114 

And while discussing the city of Mardtn, which was not ruled with the SharT'ah, yet the vast majority of its 
population was Muslim, Shaykh al-lslam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah be merciful to him, said: "As to whether it 
(Mardtn) is Dar Harb or (a land of) peace, then it is a composite in which both characteristics are present. It is not 
at the level of the state of peace upon which the rulings of Islam are implemented, where its soldiers are Muslims, 
nor is it at the level of Dar al-Harb whose population are disbelievers. Rather it is a third category, wherein the 
Muslim is to be interacted with according to his rights, and the one who leaves from the SharT'ah of Islam is to be 
fought, according to those rights." - "Majmu' al-Fatawa", by Ibn Taymiyyah, Vol. 28/135. 

But what is apparent is that the first view of the jurists and scholars is the more popularly held opinion. And Allah 
knows best. 

"Narrated by An-Nasa'T, Vol. 5/216 (#8,708) and Vol. 5/217 (#8,710), from 'Abd Allah as-Sa'di, then from 
Muhammad ibn HabTb al-Misrt, respectively, and the second is a mistake. It was declared "SahTh" by Abu Zur'ah, as 
mentioned in "Tarikh Dimashq", Vol. 31/305 and AI-AlbanT in "SahTh an-Nasa'T", (#4,183) and (#4,184), and "SahTh 
al-Jami' as-SaghTr", (#5,218). A similar phrasing with "...enemy..." in place of "...disbelievers..." was narrated by 
Ahmad in his "Musnad", Vol. 37/10 (#22,324) and declared "SahTh" by Ibn Hibban, as mentioned in "Bulugh Al- 
Maram", (#383). A third similar phrasing was narrated by Ahmad in his "Musnad", Vol. 3/206 (#1,671) and 
declared "SahTh" by Ahmad Shakir in his checking of Musnad Ahmad", Vol. 2/312, and "Hasan" by AI-AlbanT in 
"Irwa' al-GhalTI", Vol. 5/33 

31 



So it becomes confirmed that if the people of the aforementioned country are able to openly display 
their religion and they are safe from tribulation, but they do not see the victory of the Muslims as likely, 
then it is recommended upon them to emigrate. And if it is possible for them to seclude themselves, 
openly display their religion, and defend themselves, then it is obligatory upon them to remain. But if 
they are unable to openly display their religion, or they fear they will be put into tribulation regarding 
their religion, emigration becomes obligatory upon them, so long as they are able to do so. And this is 
the summary of the discussion regarding the people of the aforementioned country. And from this, it 
becomes known that if emigration was obligated upon him, he is sinful by remaining. And whoever it 
(i.e. emigration) is not obligatory upon, there is no sin upon him by remaining. And whoever has no sin 
upon him, then his faith is complete as long as he fulfills the articles of faith. And whoever is sinful by 
remaining, then his faith is lacking, even if he fulfills the articles of faith. And from that, it becomes 
known that the variations in level, is well-known, in accordance to the (amount) of love (of Allah) and 
hate (of disbelief) in one's heart. And the one who obeys their order without compulsion or weakness is 
in (a state of) disobedience. And whoever complies, out of compulsion, while his heart hates it, then he 
is not sinful. (This is because) the ruling of compulsion in matters, which are less than disbelief, are the 
same rulings as compulsion in disbelief. Yes, whoever is compelled while he was able to emigrate, then 
he has disobeyed, because he was the one who assisted them by living amongst them. And Allah knows 
best. 

And whoever is ruled upon with other than the SharT'ah of Muhammad; if it necessitates him to permit 
what is unlawful or make unlawful what is permitted in the (Islamic) law, then it is not allowed for him 
to accept it nor obey it. And it is upon him to reject that and to hate it unless he is compelled upon that 
(action) with what is labelled as (genuine) compulsion, according to the (Islamic) law. "And if he is ruled 
upon with what complies with the SharT'ah of Muhammad, then it must be accepted, and it is not upon 
him to degradehimself by subjecting himself to their rulings, while he is able to emigrate. Otherwise, 
there would bea degradationof the religion by that. And Allah says: 

4And never will Allah grant to the disbelievers a way (to triumph) over the 6e/;ei/ers.)>{An-Nisa', 141) 



For a discussion on the definitions of compulsion, refer to "Al-Muhalla bil-Athar", Vol. 5/330, by Ibn Hazm, "Kashf 
al-Asrar", Vol. 4/538, by 'Ala' ad-DTn al-Bukhari, and "Hashiyat ash-SharqawT 'Ala Tuhfat at-Tullab", Vol. 2/390 by 
Ash-SharqawT. And for a discussion on the conditions for genuine compulsion, look to "Al-Mabsut", Vol. 7/119, by 
as-SarkhasT, and "Fat'h al-Bari", Vol. 12/390-393, by Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani. 



32 



THE SIXTH QUESTION: 

[The Rulings Upon Those Who Emigrate to The Muslim Lands vs. Those Who Emigrate to the 
Lands of the Disbelievers and the Effect Upon the Wealth of Both Types of Emigration] 

The questioner asked: "And what is your opinion regarding two groups who heard that emigration to 
the Muslim countries and living therein has a disastrous financial affect, but that living in the countries 
of the disbelievers does not have this disastrous financial affect, rather it only destroys the religion? 
Then one of the two chose to travel to the Muslim countries and chose the destruction of wealth in 
order to ensure the preservation of his religion, while the second travelled to the countries of the 
disbelievers and chose the destruction of the religion over wealth. What is your opinion regarding the 
faith of these two and in what state is their faith? And is a person sinful if he labels the one who 
travelled to the countries of disbelief as a 'hypocrite'?" 

Answer to the Sixth Question: 

The answer: He, >, said: 

^Whoever wishes for the quick-passing (transitory enjoyment of this world). We readily grant him what 

We will for whom We like. Then, afterwards. We have appointed for him Hell, he will burn therein 
disgraced and rejected.And whoever desires the Hereafter and strives for it, with the necessary effort 
due for it while he is a believer, then such are the ones whose striving shall be appreciated, thanked 
and rewarded Cfay/A//o/7J.)>(AI-lsra', 18-19) 

So what a difference between the one who chose the life of this world and its adornments then reaches 
to the country of disbelief in order to gather its vanities and raise its flags,versus the one who chose the 
everlasting hereafter. So he was patient upon its afflictions and its hardships. Allah, J^rj j*, said: 

4And among mankind is he who worships Allah as it were, upon the very edge (i. e. in doubt); if good 
befalls him, he is content therewith; but if a trial befalls him, he turns back on his face (i.e. reverts back 
to disbelief). He loses both this world and the Hereafter. That is the evident /oss.)>(AI-Hajj, 11) 

This was revealed regarding people from the Bedouins who would enter Islam and then come to the 
land of emigration, AI-MadTnah al-Munawwarah. Then if it coincided with a year of strong rain, and their 
horses had given birth and their wives gave birth to a male, he would say: 'This is a righteous religion, 

33 



otherwise he would turn back on his heels and say: 'This is an evil religion.' AI-BukharT ^^narrated in his 
"Sahih" saying: 'A Bedouin entered Islam and emigrated to AI-MadTnah. Then soon after he became 
feverish so he said, 'O Muhammad, release me from my pledge of allegiance,' but he refused. Then he, 
^j iAt- ill ijw>, said: 'Verily, Al-Madtnah is lil<e a smelting furnace; it expels its impurities." - End Quote. 

So whoever resides in the land of Islam, then he has done the right thing. But whoever emigrates to the 
land of disbelief, then he has earned Allah's anger (due to that),because of the forbiddance of him 
emigrating there, as well as the corruption of his heart with thisvile belief,which resembles the (words 
of)past disbelievers: 

^They said: "For us, we see an evil omen from you. "^(Ya-STn, 18) 

<UJ1 wUP «JS jUs UjJ i\ AAA j<oj J— .ij^ \^jJaj_ AL^ » ^t^/^"* '-'!j# 

^And if evil afflicted them, they ascribed it to evil omens connected with Musa and those with him. Be 
informed! Verily, their evil omens are with Allah.^{M-A'raf, 131) 

And labelling the one mentioned as a hypocrite; if what is meant by that is the hypocrisy of action, with 
the intent of deterring and being harsh, then there is nothing wrong with that. As 'Umar ibn al-Khattab 
said regarding Hatib, U^ ^\ ^^y. "Verily, he is a hypocrite! He has betrayed Allah and His 

IVlessenger."^^But if what was meant by it was the hypocrisy in belief, then it is forbidden because no 
one sees it except Allah, >. So that would be forbidden, because; did the one who said so tear open his 
heart? ^°And Allah knows best." 



^^"Sahih al-Bukhari", (#1,883), (#7,209), (#7,211), (#7,216), (#7,322), and "Sahih Muslim", (#1,381) and (#1,383), all 
from Jabir ibn 'Abdillah, u.^ iii ^j, all with similar phrasings; some with the full story and some with only the final 
sentence. All but one narration states: "It expels its impurities and decontaminates its purities." 

This is actually a combination of two narrations of the story of Hatib ibn AbT Balta'ah, "upiin ^j. The first mentions 
'Umar saying, "Leave me to strike the neck of this Munafiq (Hypocrite)." This was narrated by AI-BukharT in his 
"Sahih", (#3,007), (#4,274) and Muslim in his "Sahih", (#2,494). The second narration mentions 'Umar saying, "He 
has betrayed Allah, His Messenger and the Believers, so leave me to strike his neck." And was narrated by AI- 
BukharT in his "Sahih", (#6,259), (#6,939) and (#3,983). 

Referring to the commendation of the Messenger of Allah, ^j i^ iii J^, who said to Usamah ibn Zayd,u,^iiii ^„ 
when the later killed a polytheist after he had apparently declared the testimony of faith in order to spare himself 
from Usamah's sword: "Did tie say/La llaha Ilia Allah',yet you killed him?' Usamah said, 'O Messenger of Allah, he 
only said it out of fear of the weapons.' The Prophet, ^j "U* iii J-f, replied: 'Did you tear open his heart in order to 
know if it said it or not7 - Narrated by Muslim in his "Sahth", (#96) on the authority of Usamah ibn Zayd, u^^iii^,. 

And it appears from this discussion by Imam al-Ahdal, may Allah be merciful to him, that he held this statement 
of 'Umar towards Hatib, i^iii ^,, in his accusation of hypocrisy, to be a minor form of hypocrisy in action only, based 
on the fact that major hypocrisy of the heart cannot be seen. However, it is noteworthy that other scholars held 
this statement of 'Umar towards Hatib, w^iii ^„ as being a form of TakfTr, which would only be made in the case of 
major hypocrisy. And although 'Umar was mistaken in that judgement towards Hatib specifically, his judgement 

34 



THE SEVENTH QUESTION: 

[The Funeral Prayer of the One Who Claims to be from the Community of the Christians vs. 
the Funeral Prayer for the One Who Claims to Belong to the Community of the Muslim 
Kingdom] 

The questioner asked: "And what do you say if two funerals took place where one of them was a funeral 
for a man who claims that he was from the 'subjects of the Christians'while the other one was from the 
'subjects of the Islamic Kingdom', and both of them are Muslim? Which of these two do you give 
preference to in praying upon?" 

The Answer to the Seventh Question: 

The Answer: The prayer upon the subject of the Islamic Kingdom is given preference over prayer of the 
subject of the Kingdom of disbelief. This is because the former is superior and more just, which is well- 
known. And he is given preference over the subject of the Christians, even if he was a jurist, whereas the 
subject of Islam was not a jurist, because his comprehension did not guide him to the truth. And 
whoever increases in knowledge, but does not increase in piety, then he has not increased except in 
distance away from Allah. However, assuming that the subject of the disbelievers was compelled and 
weak and was unable to emigrate, then he is equal to the subject of the Muslims, and that is apparent. 
And Allah knows best. 



upon betraying Allah and His Messenger, being a major form of hypocrisy would be correct. As Ibn Taymiyyah, may 
Allah be merciful to him, said: 

"And the permissibility of executing of the Zindtq, hypocrite without being given the opportunity to repent is 
indicated by what was narrated in the two SahThs, in the story of Hatib ibn AbT Balta'ah. He said: 'So 'Umar said: 'O 
Messenger of Allah, allow me to strike the neck of this hypocrite.' So the Messenger of Allah, ^j t^ ^\ J-f, said: 
'Verily, he participated in Badr. And what would tell you? Perhaps Allah looked at the people of Badr and said: 'Do 
whatever you wish, as I have forgiven you.' So it indicates that the striking of the neck of the hypocrite without 
being given the opportunity to repent is legislated, as the Prophet did not condemn 'Umar in permitted the striking 
of the neck of the hypocrite. Rather, he replied by saying that he was not a hypocrite, and that instead, he (i.e. 
Hatib) was from the people of Badr, who had been forgiven. So if hypocrisy, in which there is no doubt that it is 
(truly) hypocrisy) becomes seen, then it permits the blood." [Look to "As-Sarim al-Maslul 'Ala Shatim ar-Rasul", by 
Shaykh al-lslam Ibn Taymiyyah, Vol. 3/663-664] 



35 



THE EIGHTH QUESTION: 

[The Ruling Upon the One Who Turns Away From the Ruling of Islam in Favour of the Ruling 
of the Christian Laws] 

The questioner asked: "And what is your opinion regarding the one who had a dispute and he seeks the 
ruling of the SharT'ah, and the judgment of the SharT'ah is applied to him, but the other one says, 'I am 
from the 'subjects of the Christians' and I want the ruling of the Christians.' Then what do you say? Is his 
wealth permitted and is he an apostate, or not?' 

The Answer to the Eighth Question: 

The Answer: If the (Muslim) subject of the Christians said that, while hating the ruling of the SharT'ah 
and permitted the ruling of the Christians, then he has disbelieved and has become an apostate, upon 
whom the rulings of apostasy, which have been approved in their place, are to be implemented. But if 
he said that without any intention, nor making it permissible, then he is a Fasiq (wicked sinner) who is to 
be disciplined with whatever the ruling of the pure SharT'ah sees fit. "And His, J^rj j*, statement was 
held upon the first category: 



The rule: "Permitting What is Forbidden is Disbelief" is correct and relevant only in matters where the action, 
statement or belief under discussion is a sin, which is less than disbelief, in-and-of-itself. So for instance, when it 
comes to drinking alcohol, committing fornication/adultery or theft - if the accused holds those sins to be 
permissible, then in addition to being guilty of the actual sin itself, he has disbelieved (due to his view that this sin 
was permissible). However, if the accused does not hold the sin to be permissible, then he is only guilty of the sin 
itself. However, in matters where the action, statement or belief under discussion is disbelief in-and-of-itself, then 
the one guilty of committing it has disbelieved, regardless of his opinion regarding its permissibility. So for 
instance, forming allegiance with the disbelievers against the Muslims, belittling Islam in some way, or seeking 
judgements and rulings other than those of the Islamic SharT'ah - these are examples, which are disbelief in-and- 
of-themselves. And therefore the opinion of the one guilty of committing such things, regarding their permissibility 
becomes irrelevant because he has already committed disbelief. 

The jurists have disagreed upon the rulings of certain actions and whether or not these actions are considered to 
be disbelief in-and-of-themselves. One typical example is the abandonment of prayer. There are some who held 
the abandonment or prayer itself to be disbelief and there are others who held that abandoning prayer only 
reaches disbelief if the accused does so, due to his opinion that it was permissible for him to abandon the prayer 
(or that the prayer was not obligatory). And even though the evidence of the SharT'ah points to the abandonment 
of prayer as an action of disbelief on its own, it is not unusual to find statements of the jurists where they add the 
condition of permissibility to this sin in order to label it as disbelief. And this is what Shaykh 'Abd Allah al-Ahdal, 
may Allah be merciful to him, did above in his discussion of seeking rulings other than those of the Islamic SharT'ah, 
as he has made the disbelief of this action to be conditional upon the opinion of permissibility by the one who 
commits it. 

However, the correct opinion is that seeking judgments and rulings from other than the SharT'ah is an action of 
disbelief in-and-of-itself, regardless whether the one who does so believes that non-Islamic ruling to be better, 
equal to, or merely allowed to seek instead of the Islamic SharT'ah. And the reality is that even the evidences 

36 



^But no, hy your Lord, they can have no Faith, until they mal<e you (0 Muhammad) judge in all 
disputes between them, and find in themselves no resistance against your decisions, and accept 
(them) with full submission.^{An-N\sa', 65) 

Ibn Abi Hatim ^^and Ibn Mardawayh narrated from the path of Ibn LahT'ah from Abul-Aswad, who said: 
"Two men took their dispute to the Messenger of Allah, ^j ^ k\ J^, so he judged between them. 



brought forth by the Shaykh in this answer indicate this. This is because the action itself is disbelief, and so the 
condition of permissibility is irrelevant to this action, which is disbelief in-and-of-itself. And due to this, most of the 
scholars described the action itself as disbelief, without adding the condition of permissibility upon that action. (In 
fact, in an upcoming paragraph, the Shaykh quotes his ancestor who himself refers to this action itself as a form of 
major disbelief, and he did not mention any condition of permissibility.) For instance. Imam 'Abd al-Lattf ibn 'Abd 
ar-Rahman, may Allah be merciful to him, was asked, about that which the people of old-fashioned customs - from 
the Bedouins and others - judge with, from the customs of their fathers and their grandfathers. Are they labelled 
with disbelief after they have been made aware?" So he answered, "Whoever seeks a judgment from other than 
the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of His Messenger, n-L-j 4^1* iii J-^, after it has been made known to him, then he is 
a disbeliever. Allah, Ji«j, said: 

And whosoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed, such are the Kafirun. 

And He, Ji«i', said: 

Do they seek other than the religion of Allah..." - the verse. 

And He, Jioj-, said: 

Have you seen those (hyprocrites) who claim that they believe in that which has been sent down to you, and 
that which was sent down before you, and they wish to go for judgement (in their disputes) to the Taghut (false 
judges, etc.) while they have been ordered to reject them..." - the verse. 

And He, Jioj-, said: 

And verily. We have sent among every Ummah (community, nation) a IVIessenger (proclaiming): "Worship Allah 

(Alone), and avoid (or keep away from) Taghut..." - the verse. And the verses which carry this meaning are many." 

- Look to "Ad-Durar as-Saniyyah Fil-Ajwibah an-Najdiyyah", Vol. 10/426. This was also explained by Ibn Kathtr, may 
Allah be merciful to him, in "Al-Bidayah wan-Nihayah", Vol. 17/162-163, and others. The issue of ruling with and 
seeking judgments from other than the SharT'ah being disbelief regardless of the opinion of the one doing so, was 
discussed in detail by Shaykh 'Abd al-KarTm ash-ShathilT, may Allah free him, in his book "FasI al-Maqal FT Anna Man 
Takakama ilat-Taghut Minal-Hukkam Kafir Min Ghayri Juhud Wa La Istihial". 
""TafsTr Ibn AbT Hatim", Vol. 3/994, (#5,560) 

37 



Then the one who was judged against said: 'Let us return to 'Umar ibn al-Khattab.' So the Messenger of 
Allah, (iJl-j <lJi*. ill Juj, said: 'Yes, go 'Umar.' So when they came to 'Umar, the man said: 'O Ibn al-Khattab, 
the Messenger of Allah, (►i-j iJi*- k\ J^, judged against this person, so he said: 'Let us return to 'Umar', so 

we returned to you.' So he (i.e. 'Umar) asked: 'Is this so?' He said, 'Yes.' So 'Umar said: 'Remain in your 
places until I come out to you. Then I will judge between you.' So he came out to them holding his 
sword, then he struck the one who said: 'Let us return to 'Umar,' killing him thereby. And the other one 
fled to the Messenger of Allah, ^j ^ iii Ju?, and said: 'O Messenger of Allah, 'Umar killed my 

companion, and I had not evaded (him), then he would have killed me.' So the Messenger of Allah, Ju? 

(Jl-.j -a*, ill, said, '/ did not assume that 'Umar would dare kill the believers.' So Allah, J^rj j*, revealed: 

^But no, by your Lord, they can have no fo/t/i.. .^{An-Nisa', 65)- the verse... 

So the blood of that man became permitted and 'Umar was freed from (any blame regarding) his blood.' 
- End quote.^* 

And it has strengthening narrations, ^^which were narrated by Zuhaym ^^in his TafsTr and Al-Hakim at- 
Tirmithi, in his "Nawadir". " 

And He, >, said: 

01 (jyf Iwj py^lkJl J\ \yS^. of OjOjjJ dip jA Jjjl U} dillj Jjjf Ittj \yj>'\ °Jf\ O^jj 'jiJ}i\ J\ ') °S\h 

^Have you seen those (hypocrites) who claim that they believe in that which has been sent down to 

you, and that which was sent down before you, and they wish to go for judgement (in their disputes) 
to the Taghut (false judges, etc.) while they have been ordered to reject them. But Shaytan wishes to 
lead them far ostray. )>(An-Nisa', 60) 



This narration was rejected by Az-Zayla'T in "TakhrTj Al-Kashaf" , Vol. 1/330 and by Ibn KathTr in "TafsTr al-Qur'an 
al-'Athim", Vol. 1/146. 

Some of the narrations are as the Shaykh mentioned, and some of them mention going to Abu Bakr as-SiddTq 
before going to 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, Uf;* iii ^^j. Ibn KathTr mentioned in "Musnad al-Faruq", Vol. 2/576, that the 
two chains strengthen each other. This was also mentioned by Ibn Taymiyyah in "As-Sarim al-Maslul 'Ala Shatim ar- 
Rasul", Vol. 2/83. 

In our copy of the manuscript, it says "Zuhaym". We assume this is a typographical error, and what was meant as 
"Duhaym", referring to Abu Is'haq IbrahTm ibn 'Abd Ar-Rahman ibn IbrahTm ibn Duhaym. This narration was 
attributed to him in his TafsTr by Ibn KathTr in "TafsTr al-Qur'an al-'AthTm", Vol. 1/146, and As-SuyutT in "Ad-Durr al- 
Manthur", Vol. 2/322. 

"Nawadir al-Usul FT AhadTth ar-Rasul", under Fundamental #43 

38 



Ibn Abi Hatim and At-TabaranT ^^ narrated, with an authentic chain, from Ibn 'Abbas, who said: "Abu 
Burdah ^^ al-AslamT was a soothsayer. So he would judge between the Jews regarding that which they 
would dispute. Then some people from the Muslims took a dispute to him, so Allah, J^rj j*, revealed: 

4^Have you seen those (hypocrites) who claim.. .^- the verse... 

And Ibn Is'haq, Ibn al-Munthir and Ibn AbT Hatim ^° narrated from Ibn 'Abbas that Al-Julas ibn as-Samit - 
prior to his repentance - as well as Mu'attib ibn Qushayr, Rafi' ibn Zayd and BashTr, used to claim Islam, 
and then some men from their people called them to the Messenger of Allah, ^j *-i^ iii Ju?. So they (i.e. 
those named) called them (i.e. their people) to the soothsayers who were the judges in the pre-lslamic 
period of ignorance, so Allah, J^rj y-, revealed this verse. 

And these HadTths have strengthening narrations, which were narrated by Ibn JarTr, 'Abd ibn Humayd, 
Ibn AbT Hatim, and Ath-Tha'labT from Ibn 'Abbas, which As-SuyutT - may Allah, >, be merciful to him — 
collected in "Ad-Durr al-Manthur". ^^ I say: And there is no doubt that the one who said, "I want the 
ruling of the Christians," has deviated and opened himself up to criticism and resembled the hypocrites, 
whom Allah said regarding them: 

^And when it is said to them: "Come to what Allah has sent down and to the Messenger," you see the 
hypocrites turn away from you with oi/ers/o/7.^{An-Nisa', 61) 

'Abd ibn Humayd, Ibn JarTr, Ibn al-Munthir and Ibn AbT Hatim ^^narrated from Mujahid regarding this 
verse, that he said: "A man from the hypocrites and a man from the Jews disputed, so the hypocrite 
said, 'Let us go to Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf.' And the Jew said, 'Let us go to Muhammad, ^j aJj. m\ Jus." So 
Allah revealed this verse. And Ibn JarTr narrated from Ar-RabT' ibn Anas that he said: "Two men from the 
companions of the Prophet, ^j ^ m\ J^, had a dispute between themselves. One of them was a 

believer and the other was a hypocrite. So the believer called him to the Prophet, ^j ^ iii Ju?, and the 
hypocrite called him to Ka'b ibn al-Ashraf. So Allah, J^rj y-, revealed: 



^^"TafsTr Ibn AbT Hatim", Vol. 3/991 (#5,548) "Al-Mu'jam al-KabTr", (#12,045). Its chain of narration was declared 
"Jayyid" by Ibn Hajar in "Al-lsabah FTTamyTz as-Sahabah", Vol. 7/38. 

In our copy of the manuscript, it stated "Burzah", but the correct name is Burdah. [Look to "Al-lsabah FTTamyTz 
as-Sahabah", Vol. 6/434 and 7/37-38] 

'°lbn Is'haq, Vol. 1/526, "TafsTr al-Qur'an" by Ibn al-Munthir, (#1,944) and (#1,947), from the statement of Ibn 
Is'haq. 

^'"Ad-Durr al-Manthur fit-TafsTr bil-Ma'thur", Vol. 4/515-517. 

'^"Jami' al-Bayan FT Ta'wTI Ay al-Qur'an" by Ibn JarTr, 7/193-194, "TafsTr al-Qur'an" by Ibn Al-Munthir, (#1,943), 
"TafsTr Ibn AbT Hatim", Vol. 3/991, (#5,548) 

39 



^And when it is said to them: "Come to what Allah has sent down and to the Messenger," you see the 
hypocrites turn away from you with oi/ers/on.^(An-Nisa', 61) 

So the noble verse judged that the one who turns away, in other words, the one who averts from the 
SharT'ah of Muhammad, is deserving of the label of Hypocrisy, and to be labelled as such, due to him 
committing what contradicts the believing Muslims from following and submitting to the ruling of Allah 
and His Messenger, ^j ^ k\ Ju», in all of that which his seal (of Prophethood) came with. May Allah 

cause our end (i.e. death) to be upon faith, through His favour. His generosity and His Open- 
Handedness. 

Amin. 

In the Fatawa of the Sayyid (leader/master), ^^ the eminent scholar, the best of the great researchers 
until his era, (the best of) those with understanding of the Truth and those who have the best Islamic 
manners, from ZabTd, '"' 'Abd ar-Rahman ibn Sulayman Maqbul al-Ahdal, may Allah, >, be merciful to 
him, has come the following phrase: 

"Know that what some of the tribes in the area of Al-Hijaz follow from the customs, which contradict the 
(Islamic) law, and likewise which other tribes than theirs follow; the Imams of Islam and the guiders of 
the people have spoken about them. And a question regarding that was raised to the MuftT of his era in 
the Yemeni states, the Wall (Ally of Allah), the eminent scholar, Yusuf ibn Yusuf al-Muqri' and the one 
who initiated it, was the eminent scholar, Taqiyyud-DTn al-FatT, the MuftT of Ar-Rawdh. And he, along 
with a large group of scholars from ZabTd declared the aforementioned answer of Al-Muqri' to be 
correct. From them was Al-Fakhr al-NashirT, Al-Jamal al-Qimat and Al-Jamal az-Zayla'T. And from the 
scholars of the mountains, Al-Jamal an-NaharT, the author of "Al-Kifayah", and others." 

"And the summary of the answer is that the customs of the tribes, which are well-known amongst them, 
and which they label with names that they have made up, along with inventions which they have 
fabricated and which oppose the SharT'ah, and whoever judges with them or holds them (upon someone 
else), then he is outside of the religion; cornered in Hell-fire along with the misguided ones. ^^ And 
whoever believes in the validity of that, then he is a disbeliever without doubt, whose blood is permitted 
with its conditions. And it is not allowed for anyone from the people of the religion to remain silent 
about that. Rather, it is obligatory to object to whomever participates in that, or speaks (in favour) of it. 
And it is not allowed to take judgements to it (i.e. those customs) and Allah is more knowledgeable 
regarding what is good for His slaves. And that was only given (to people) by the disbelievers and the 



In his review of this translation, Shaykh Anwar al-AwlakI, may Allah preserve him, explained: "In Tihamah (the 
land of the Shaykh) 'Sayyid' is the title given to the scholars who are from the descendants of the household of the 
Prophet, ^j i^ ^\ J-f. 'FaqTh' is the title given to scholars who do not belong to Ahl al-Bayt." 
ZabTd: A city on Yemen's Western coastal plain. 

And here is the statement of the author's ancestor, may Allah be merciful to them both, which was referred to in 
an earlier footnote, where he did not place any condition of permissibility upon the major disbelief of ruling by 
other than the SharT'ah of Allah or seeking rulings other than those of Allah's etc. 

40 



ignorant ones from the heretics. And they threw that to their devils, in order to lead them to their 
destruction and they claim that they by doing so, they seek to rectify the matters and to repel any 
tribulations and evil. So with that, they (those who invented those customary rulings) expel them (the 
followers of those judgments) from their religion, just as the Shaytan expelled the people of polytheism 
(out of the religion) through worshiping idols by making images of their Prophets and later on, 
worshiping them. ~'^ So we ask Allah for safety, as Allah has originated the creation and legislated for 
them certain responsibilities in which there are the benefits for their religion, their worldly life and their 
hereafter. So what is obligatory upon the Muslim rulers, upon the active scholars, and upon the general 
public who follow the religion of the leader of the Messengers (i.e. the Prophet, ^^ ^ h,\ J^), is to 

reject that (fabricated law), to remove it, and to deter them away from it. And it is not allowed for 
anyone who has the ability (to publicly condemn that) to remain silent about that, or to be tolerant of it, 
because it is from the greatest of objectionable matters." - End quote. 

So if that were regarding the customs, which the people of Islam innovated, then what do you think 
about the laws of the transgressing disbelievers? 

And with the praise of Allah, >, what I wanted to convey regarding these questions is complete. And all 
praise is due to Allah, foremost and lastly, inwardly and outwardly. And may Allah send blessings and 
peace upon our master, Muhammad and upon his family and companions. And there is no power nor 
might except through Allah, AI-'AIT (the High), AI-'Athim (the Great). 

And on the day in which I completed the explained answer, during the night, while sleeping, I saw the 
Prophet, (|Jl-j aJj. iii J^, while myself and my brother, the Sayyid (leader/master) Hasan were in front of 
the Messenger and the questioner was upon the right of the Messenger, swaying back and forth, like 
the branch of a tree. And the appearance of the clothing of the Prophet,(iJL-j *J^ iii Ju?, resembled 
Kurdish clothing. So that indicated the acceptance of the answer and the question. ^^ 

O Allah, give victory to the Muslims and grant them success in what is correct. 



Referring to the Hadtth narrated by AI-BukharT (#4,920) from Ibn 'Abbas, i^iii ^„ who said: "The statues which 
were amongst the people of Nuh, ended up with the Arabs." - until he said: "They were names of righteous men of 
the people of Nuh, then when they died, the Shaytan revealed to their people that they should erect structures 
upon the places where they used to sit and call them by their names. So they did that, but they were not 
worshipped. Then when those ones passed away and the knowledge was removed, they were worshipped." 

In his review of this translation, Shaykh Anwar al-Awlaki, may Allah preserve him, explained: "The fact that the 
questioner was on the right of the Prophet, ^j "^l* iii J.^, is a good sign of the virtue of the questioner. And the 
Imam and his brother in front of the Prophet, ^j iJs- iiii J^, is a sign of following the Sunnah of the Prophet, iii J~^ 
ifJ_oj <a*, (The opposite is true: If someone sees the back of Rasul Allah, ^j i^ iii J-o, or has his back turned 
towards Rasul Allah, ^j "U* iii J~^, then that is a sign of going against the Sunnah) 

The clothes of the Kurds: Apparently Muslim soldiers in the time of the author used to wear uniforms similar to the 
dress of the Kurds. If this is true it would be a sign of approval of their efforts to see the Prophet wearing the same 
clothes as theirs." 

41 



Bibliography 

1. "Al-Asrar al-Marfu'ah Fil-Akhbar al-Mawdhu'ah", by 'AIT ibn Sultan AI-QarT, publication of "Al- 
Maktab al-lslami"; Beirut, 2"^ Edition, 1406 H. 

2. "Al-Adab ash-Shar'iyyah", by Ibn Muflih al-HanbalT, publication of "Mu'assasat ar-Risalah"; 
Beirut, 1'' Edition, 1416 H. 

3. "Ahkam Ahl ath-Thimmah", by Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah, publication of "Dar al-'llm lil-MalayTn", 
1983 G. 

4. "Ahkam Ahl ath-Thimmah", by Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah, publication of "RamadT lin-Nashr", 1^' 
Edition, 1418 H. 

5. "Al-Bidayah wan-Nihayah", by 'Imad ad-DTn ibn KathTr, publication of "HajY lit-Tiba'ah wan-Nashr 
wat-TawzT' wal-l'lan"; JTzah, 1'' Edition, 1419 H. 

6. "Bada'i' As-Sana'i'", by 'Ala' ad-DTn al-KasanT, publication of Zakariyya 'AITYusuf 

7. "Al-Badr al-MunTr fTTakhrTj al-AhadTth wal-Akhbar al-Waqi'ah fish-Sharh al-KabTr", by 'Umar ibn 
'AIT ibn al-Mulaqqin, publication of "Dar al-Hijrah", 1'' Edition, 1425 H. 

8. "Bulugh Al-Maram Min Adillatil-Ahkam", by Ahmad ibn Hajar al-'AsqalanT, publication of "Dar al- 
Fayha'", l""^ Edition, 1417 H. 

9. "Al-Ba'ith al-HathTth Sharh Ikhtisar 'Ulum al-HadTth", by Ahmad Shakir, publication of "Dar al- 
Kutub al-'llmiyyah"; Beirut, l" Edition 

10. "Dha'Tf Sunan an-Nasa'T", by Muhammad Nasir ad-DTn al-AlbanT, publication of "Al-Maktab al- 
IslamT"; Beirut, 1'' Edition, 1411 H. 

11. "Dha'Tf al-Jami' as-SaghTr wa Ziyadatuh", by Muhammad Nasir ad-DTn al-AlbanT, publication of 
"Al-Maktab al-lslamT"; Beirut, 2"'^ Edition, 1408 H. 

12. "Ad-Durar as-Saniyyah Fil-Ajwibah an-Najdiyyah", compiled by 'Abd ar-Rahman ibn Muhammad 
ibn Qasim, 5'^ Edition, 1416 H. 

13. "Ad-Durr al-Manthur fit-TafsTr bil-Ma'thur", by Jalal ad-DTn as-SuyutT, verification by Dr. 'Abd 
Allah ibn 'Abd al-Muhsin at-TurkT, publication of "Dar HajY"; Cairo, l" Edition, 1424 H. 

14. "FasI al-Maqal FT Anna Man Takakama ilat-Taghut Minal-Hukkam Kafir Min Ghayri Juhud Wa La 
Istihial" by Shaykh Shaykh 'Abd al-KarTm ash-ShathilT, 1'' Edition, 1422 H. 

15. "Fat'h al-BarT", by Ibn Hajar al-'AsqalanT,publication of "Maktabat Dar as-Salam"; Riyadh and 
"Maktabat Dar al-Fayha'"; Damascus, 1'' Edition, 1418 H. 

42 



16. "Al-Fatawa al-HadTthiyyah", by Ahmad ibn Hajar al-HaytamT al-MakkT, publication of "Dar al- 
Fil<r"; Beirut 

17. "Al-Fawa'id al-Majmu'ah Lil-Ahadith al-Mawdhu'ah", by Muhammad ibn 'AIT ash-Shawkani, 1'* 
Edition, 1380 H. 

18. "Hashiyat ash-SharqawT 'Ala Tuhfat at-Tullab", by Ash-SharqawT 

19. "Al-'llal al-Kabir", by Abu 'Tsa Muhammad at-TirmithT, verification by SubhT as-Samara'T, Abul- 
Ma'atian-Nuriand Mahmud Muhammad KhalTI as-Sa'TdT, publication of "'Alam al-Kutub"; Beirut, 
and "Maktabat an-Nahdhah al-'Arabiyyah", 1'' Edition, 1409 H. 

20. "Irwa' al-GhalTI FT TakhrTj AhadTth Manar as-SabTI", by Muhammad Nasir ad-DTn al-AlbanT, 
publication of "Al-Maktab al-lslami"; Beirut, 1'' Edition 1399 

21. "Itqan Ma Yuhsin Min al-Akhbar ad-Da'irah 'Alal-Alsun", by Muhammad ibn Muhammad al- 
GhazzT, publication of "Al-Faruq lit-Tiba'ah wan-Nashr"; Cairo, 1'' Edition ,1415 H. 

22. "Al-lsabah FT TamyTz as-Sahabah", by Ahmad ibn Hajar al-'AsqalanT, publication of "Dar 
Nahdhah"; Cairo, 1392 H. 

23. "Iqtidha' as-Sirat al-MustaqTm li-Mukhalafati Ahl al-JahTm", by Ahmad ibn Taymiyyah, 
publication of "Maktabat ar-Rushd", 8'*' Edition, 1421 H. 

24. "Iqtidha' as-Sirat al-MustaqTm li-Mukhalafati Ahl al-JahTm", by Ahmad ibn Taymiyyah, 
verification by Khalid 'Abd al-LatTf as-Saba' al-'AlamT, publication of "Dar al-Kitab al-'ArabT"; 
Beirut, 2"'^ Edition, 1418 H. 

25. "Jami' at-TirmithT", by Abu 'Tsa Muhammad at-TirmithT, verification by Ahmad Muhammad 
Shakir and others, publication of "Dar Ihya' at-Turath al-'ArabT"; Beirut 

26. "Al-Jami' li-Shu'ab al-Tman", by Ahmad ibn al-Husayn al-BayhaqT, verification under supervision 
by Mukhtar Ahmad an-NadawT, publication of "Maktabat ar-Rushd"; Riyadh, 1'' Edition, 1423 H. 

27. "Jami' al-Bayan 'An Ta'wTI Ay al-Qur'an" by Muhammad ibn JarTr at-TabarT, verification by Dr. 
'Abd Allah ibn 'Abd al-Muhsin at-TurkT, publication of "Dar Hajr"; Cairo, 1'' Edition, 1422 H. 

28. "Kashf al-Asrar", by 'Ala' ad-DTn al-BukharT, publication of "Dar al-Kutub al-'llmiyyah"; Beirut, 
1418 H. 

29. "Khalq Af'al al-'Ibad", by Muhammad ibn Isma'TI al-BukharT, publication of "Muassasat ar- 
Rislalah"; Beirut, 3"^ Edition, 1411 H. 

30. "Al-Kamil FT Dhu'afa' ar-Rijal",by 'Abd Allah ibn 'AdT, publication of "Dar al-Kutub al-'llmiyyah", 
1'' Edition, 1418 H. 



43 



31. "Mu'jam al-Manahi al-Lafthiyyah", by Shaykh Bakr ibn 'Abd Allah Abu Zayd, publication of "Dar 
al-'Asimah"; Riyadh, S"* Edition, 1417 H. 

32. Al-Muhalla bil-Athar", by Ibn Hazm, publication of "Dar al-Fikr", compiled by "At-Tiba'ah al- 
Munirah" 

33. "Musnad Ahmad", by Ahmad ibn Hanbal ash-ShaybanT, verification and explanation of Ahmad 
Muhammad Shakir and Hamzah Ahmad az-Zayn, publication of "Dar al-HadTth"; Cairo, 1^' 
Edition, 1416 H. 

34. "AI-MughnT", by Abu Muhammad 'Abd Allah ibn Qudamah al-HanbalT, verification by 'Abd Allah 
ibn 'Abd al-Muhsin at-TurkT and 'Abd al-Fattah Muhhammad al-Hilu, publication of "Dar 'Alam 
al-Kutub"; Riyadh, 3'=^ Edition, 1417 H. 

35. "Al-Mabsut", by Abu Bakr Muhammad as-SarkhasT, publication of "Dar al-Ma'rifah"; Beirut, 2"'' 
Edition 

36. "Majmu' al-Fatawa", by Ahmad ibn Taymiyyah, verification by 'Amir al-Jazzar and Anwar al-Baz, 
publication of "Dar al-Wafa'; Al-Mansurah, 3'"'^ Edition, 1426 H. 

37. "Al-Mu'jam al-KabTr", by Sulayman ibn Ahmad at-TabaranT, verification by HamdT ibn 'Abd al- 
MajTd as-Salafi, publication of "Maktabat al-'Ulum wal-Hikam"; Mosul, 2"'^ Edition, 1404 H. 

38. "Al-Mustadrak 'Alas-Sahihayn", by Abu 'Abd Allah al-Hakim an-Naysaburi, including the 
criticisms by Ath-ThahabT, verification by Muqbil ibn Had! al-Wadi'T, "Dar al-Haramayn"; Cairo, 1^' 
Edition, 1417 H. 

39. "Al-Mu'jam al-Awsat", by Sulayman ibn Ahmad at-TabaranT verification byTariq ibn 'Awdh Allah 
ibn Muhammad and 'Abd al-Muhsin ibn Ibrahim al-HusaynT, publication of "Dar al-Haramayn"; 
Cairo, 1415 H. 

40. "Musnad al-Faruq wa Aqwaluhu 'Ala Abwab al-'llm", by Isma'TI ibn KathTr, verification by Dr. 
'Abd al-Mu'ti Qal'abT, publication of "Dar al-Wafa'"; Egypt, l" Edition, 1411 H. 

41. "Al-Maqasid al-Hasanah FT Bayan Kathirin Min al-Ahadith al-Mushtaharah", by Muhammad ibn 
'Abd ar-Rahman as-SakhawT, publication of "Dar al-Kutub al-'Arabi", 2"'^ Edition, 1414 H. 

42. "Al-Musannaf", by Abu Bakr 'Abd ar-Razzaq as-San'anT, verification by HabTb ar-Rahman al- 
A'thamT, publication of "Manshurat al-Majlis al-'llmT" 

43. "Musnad Ahmad", by Ahmad ibn Hanbal ash-ShaybanT, verification by Shu'ayb al-Arna'ut and 
'Adil Murshid, publication "Mu'assasat ar-Risalah"; Beirut, l" Edition, 1419 H. 

44. "Mu'jam al-ManahT al-Lafthiyyah", by Shaykh Bakr ibn 'Abd Allah Abu Zayd, publication of "Dar 
al-'Asimah", Riyadh 3''' Edition, 1417 H. 



44 



45. "TakhrTj Ihya' 'Ulum ad-DTn", the title of which is "AI-MughnT 'An HamI al-Asfar fi TakhrTj Ma fi 
al-lhya' minal-AI<hbar" (Tal<hnj Ihya' 'Ulum ad-DTn), by 'Abd ar-RahTm al-'IraqT, publication of 
"Dar Sadir", 1'' Edition, 1414 H. 

46. "Rawdhat at-Talibm", by Abu Zakariyya Yahya an-NawawT, verification by 'Adil Ahmad 'Abd al- 
Mawjud and 'AIT Muhammad Mu'awwadh, publication of "Dar 'Alam al-Kutub"; and "Dar al- 
Kutub al-'llmiyyah"; Beirut, Special Edition, 1423 H. 

47. "As-Sarim al-Maslul 'Ala Shatim ar-Rasul", by Shaykh al-lslam Ibn Taymiyyah, with the 
verification of Muhammad 'Abd Allah 'Umar al-HilwanT and Muhammad KabTr Ahmad ShudrT, 
publication of "Dar Ibn Hazm"; Beirut, 1'* Edition, 1417 H. 

48. SahTh al-BukharT, the title of which is "Al-Jami' as-SahTh al-Musnad al-Mukhtasar Min Umuri 
Rasul Allah Sail Allahu 'Alayhi wa Sallam wa Sunanihi wa Ayyamihi", by Muhammad ibn Isma'TI 
al-BukharT, publication of "Al-Maktabah as-Salafiyyah", l" Edition, 1400 H. 

49. "SahTh Muslim", the title of which is "Al-Musnad as-SahTh al-Mukhtasar bi-NaqI al-'AdI 'An al-'AdI 
'An Rasul Allah Sail Allahu 'Alayhi wa Sallam" by Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj an-NaysaburT, publication 
of 'Tsa al-BabT al-HalabT, 1'* Edition, 1374 H. 

50. "SahTh Ibn Majah", by Muhammad Nasir ad-DTn al-AlbanT, publication of "Maktabat at-Tarbiyah 
al-'ArabTli-Duwal al-KhalTj", 1'* Edition, 1407 H. 

51. "Silsilat al-AhadTth as-SahThah Wa Shayun Min Fiqhiha Wa Fawa'idiha"", by Muhammad Nasir 
ad-DTn al-AlbanT, publication of "Maktabat al-Ma'arif"; Riyadh 

52. "SahTh al-Jami' as-SaghTr Wa Ziyadatih", by Muhammad Nasir ad-DTn al-AlbanT, publication of 
"Al-Maktab al-lslamT"; Beirut, 3"^ Edition, 1408 H. 

53. "Sunan Ibn Majah", by Muhammad ibn YazTd al-QizwTnT, verification by Muhammad Fu'ad 'Abd 
al-BaqT, publication of "Dar al-Fikr"; Beirut 

54. "Sunan AbT Dawud", by Sulayman ibn al-Ash'ath as-SajastanT, verification by Muhammad 
Muhyid-DTn 'Abd al-MajTd, publication of "Dar al-Fikr"; Beirut 

55. "Sunan an-Nasa'T al-Kubra", by Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb an-Nasa'T, verification by Dr. 'Abd al-Ghaffar 
Sulayman al-BandarT and Sayyid KisrawT Hasan, publication of "Dar al-Kutub al-'llmiyyah"; Beirut, 
1'' Edition, 1411 H. 

56. "As-Sunan al-Kubra", by Ahmad ibn al-Husayn al-BayhaqT, verification by Muhammad 'Abd al- 
Qadir 'Ata, publication of "Maktabat Dar al-Baz"; Makkah al-Mukarramah, 1414 H. 

57. "Silsilat al-AhadTth adh-Dha'Tfah Wa athariha as-Sayyi' fil-Ummah", by Muhammad Nasir ad-DTn 
al-AlbanT, publication of "Maktabat al-Ma'arif"; Riyadh, 1'' New Edition, 1412 H. 



45 



58. "As-Sarim al-Maslul 'Ala Shatim ar-Rasul", by Ahmad ibn Taymiyyah, publication of "RamadT lin- 
Nashr", 1'' Edition, 1417 H. 

59. "Thilal al-Jannah ft TakhrTj as-Sunnah li-lbn AbT 'Asim", by Muhammad Nasir ad-DTn al-AlbanT, 
publication of "Al-Maktab al-lslami"; Beirut, 1'' Edition, 1400 H. 

60. "Tuhfat al-Muhtaj bi-Sharh al-Minhaj", by Ahmad ibn Hajar al-HaytamT al-MakkT, publication of 
"Matba'at Mustafa Muhammad", with the notes of Ash-SharwanT and AI-'UbadT 

61. "Thakhirat al-Huffath al-Mukharriju 'Alal-Hurufi wal-Alfath", by Muhammad ibn Tahir al- 
QaysaranT, publication of "Dar as-Salaf", 1'' Edition, 1416 H. 

62. "Tarikh MadTnati Dimashq", by 'AIT ibn al-Hasan ash-Shafi'T, verification by 'Umar al-'AmrawT, 
publication of "Dar al-Fikr"; Beirut, 1416 H. 

63. "TafsTr Ibn AbT Hatim", by 'Abd ar-Rahman ibn AbT Hatim ar-RazT, verification by As'ad 
Muhammad at-Tayyib, publication of "Al-Maktabah al-'Asriyyah", Saida 

64. "TafsTr al-Qur'an" by Ibn al-Munthir, publication of "Dar al-Ma'athir", al-MadTnah an- 
Nabawiyyah, 1423 H. 

65. "TakhrTj al-Kashaf", the title of which is "TakhrTj al-AhadTth wal-Athar al-Waqi'ah fT TafsTr al- 
Kashaf liz-ZamakhsharT", by 'Abd Allah ibn Yusuf az-Zayla'T, publication of "Dar Ibn Khuzaymah", 
1'* Edition, 1414 H. 

66. "TafsTr al-Qur'an al-'AthTm" by Isma'TI ibn KathTr, publication of "Mu'assasat Qurtubah"; JTzah, 1'' 
Edition, 1421 H. 

67. "Az-Zawajir 'An Iqtiraf al-Kaba'ir", by Ahmad ibn Hajar al-HaytamT al-MakkT, publication of "Dar 
al-Ma'rifah" 



46 



Also Available From At-Tibyan Publications 

The Doubts Concerning Bay'ah and Imarah 
Shaykh 'Abdul-Qadir Ibn 'Abdil-'AzTz 

Series: Breezes, From the Gardens of Fird a ws 

The TawhTd of Action by Shayi<h 'Abdullah 'Azzam; The Path to the Land of the Battle by 
Shayiih Yusuf Ibn Salih AI-'UyayrT; Advice for the Seel<er of Knowledge hy Shaykh Sultan 
AI-'UtaybT; "And Sell Not the Covenant of Allah For A Small Gain" by Shaykh Marwan 
Ha did 

The Rulings Regarding the Muslim Prisoner 
Dr. Mur'i Ibn 'Abdillah Ibn Mur'i 

Series: Delighting the Eyes of the Ones Who Lie in Wait at Every Area 
Advice Regarding 'Ubudiyyah by Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT, The Islamic Ruling 
on the Permissibility of Self-Sacrificial Operations by Shaykh Yusuf Ibn Salih AI-'UyayrT, Abu 
Qutaybah Ash-Sham'\, The Ruling Regarding Killing One's Self To Protect Information Al- 
Mukhtar FTHukm Al-lntihdr Khawf If sha' Al-Asrar' -.Shaykh Abdul-'AzTz Al-Jarbu', Shifa' 
Sudur Al-Mu'minln: Dr. Ayman Ath-ThawahirT 

Ad-Da Id'il FiHukm MuwaldtAhl Al-lshrdk 

Imam Sulayman Ibn 'Abdillah Ibn Muhammad Ibn 'Abdil-Wahhab 

Millat Ibrahim 

Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT 

Series: Advices on Security and Precaution 

Precaution, Secrecy, and Concealment: Balancing Between Negligence and Paranoia 

Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT 



47 



The Du'a is the Weapon of the Believer 
At-Tibyan Publications 

The People Of The Ditch 
Shaykh Rifa'TSurur 

Regarding Al-Wala' and Al-Bara' 
Abu Mus'ab Az-ZarqawT 

The Doubts Regarding the Ruling of Democracy In Islam 
At-Tibyan Publications 

The Exposition Regarding the Disbelief of the One Who Assists the Americans 
Shaykh Nasir Ibn Hamad Al-Fahd 

Can Makkah become Ddr Al-Harb? 

Imam Hamad Ibn 'AtTq An-NajdT and Shaykh Abu BasTr At-TartusT 

Essay Regarding the Basic Rule of the Blood, Wealth and Honour of the Disbelievers 
At-Tibyan Publications 

We Are Ignorant Deviants! 
Shaykh Husayn Ibn Mahmud 

In Pursuit of Freedom 
Shaykh Husayn Ibn Mahmud 

A Letter from the Imprisoned Shaykh Nasir Al-Fahd 
Shaykh Nasir Al-Fahd 

Fundamental Concepts Regarding Al-Jihdd 
Imam 'Abdul-Qadir Ibn 'Abdil-'AzTz 

48 



The Clarification of Wiiat Occurred in America 
Imam Hamud Ibn 'Uqla' Ash-Shu'aybT 

A Decisive Refutation of Salaff Publications 
At-Tibyan Publications 

Verdict Regarding the Permissibility of Martyrdom 
Al-Hdfith Sulayman Ibn Nasir Al-'Ulwan 

Verily, The Victory of Allah Is Near 
Al-Hdfith Sulayman Ibn Nasir Al-'Ulwan 

Between the Permissible and What is Better 
Shaykh Abu Muhannnnad AI-MaqdisT 

Between Fighting for Injury and Fighting for Consolidation 
Shaykh Abu Muhannnnad AI-MaqdisT 

The Verdict Regarding the One Who Defensively Argues on Behalf of the Tdghut 
Shaykh 'AIT ibn Khudhayr Al-Khudhayr 

Advice to the Brethren Going to Pakistan 
Shaykh Abu Qatadah AI-FilistmT 

39 Ways to Serve and Participate in Jihad 
Shaykh 'Tsa AI-'Awshin 

Public Addresses on the Da'wah and Jihad: Between Laxity and Extremism 
Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT 

What is Your Opinion Regarding Shaykh Usdmah Ibn Lad in? 
Shaykh 'AIT Ibn Khudhayr Al-Khudhayr 

49 



When the Jihad is for the Sal<e of America 
Shayl<h Nasir Al-Fahd 

Shaylih AI-AlbanTon the Obligation of Jihad 
Shayich Muhammad Nassiriddm AI-AlbanT 

Description of Paradise 
Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim 

YES, I AM WAHHABJ I 
Shaykh Abu BasTr At-TartusT 

Debate: The Sword Vs. The Pen 
Abu Jandal AI-AzdT 

Captivity, Imprisonment and Trials 
Shaykh Abu Qatadah AI-FilistinT 

Life of the Mujahid Ahmad An-Ni'ml Al-Qurashl 
Katum As-SalafF 

The Importance of the Word 
WasTm Fat'hullah 

A Misunderstanding of the Hadlth of As-Sa'b Ibn Jath'thamah 
Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT 

The Ruling on the One Who Insults the Prophet of Allah 
At-Tibydn Publications 

Let the Expert Sharpen the Bow 
Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT 

50 



"And He Made You os Few in Their Eyes." 
Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT 

And So Tliat tlie Way oftlie Sinners May Become Manifest 
Shaykh Abu Muhammad Al-MaqdisT 

Tribalism and the Dangers of Depending on It 
Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT 

By Allah, it Has Not Lost Its Value, For Even the Bankrupt to Purchase It 
Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT 

Uhud Ar-Rass 

Shaykh Husayn Ibn Mahmud 

Act Gently With the Women 
Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT 

The Methodology & Stages Of The Messenger In Giving Da'wah 
Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT 

Abu Anas Ash-Shaml 

Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT 

As'hab Ar-Rass 

Shaykh 'Abdullah Ibn Nasir Ar-RashTd 

Regarding I'tizal and Mukhdiatah 

Shaykh 'Abdur-Rahman Ibn Hasan Al Ash-Shaykh 

When Does Hijrah Become Obligatory: The Reality of Displaying The Dm 
Shaykh 'Abdul-'AzTz Al-Jarbu' 

51 



The Torching of Ar-Rass 
Sawt Al-Jihad 

Jihad An-Nafs: Striving Against the Soul 
Shayl<h Hasan Ayyub 

"And if They Had Intended to March Out..." 
Brother AI-MaqdisT 

Mourning Over a Knightess: A Muslimah 
LuwTs 'Atiyyatullah 

Was Prophet Sulaymdn a Terrorist? 
Shaykh Dr. Muhammad Ibn Tarhunl 

The Five Ground Rules for the Achievement of the Tradition of Victory or Its Absence 
Shaykh Abdul-Qadir Ibn Abdil-AzTz 

The Obligation of Holding Steadfast to the Our'an and Sunnah 
Shaykh Abdul-Qadir Ibn Abdil-AzTz 

Are the Taliban from Ahl As-Sunnah? 
At-Tibydn Publications 

The HadTth of Slaughter: Laqad Ji'tukum Bith-Thabh 
At-Tibydn Publications 

"And Incite the Believers" 

Shaykh 'Abdullah Ibn Muhammad Ar-Rashud 

"Such Are the Messengers Tested, and Then the Outcome Will Be In Their Favor" 
Abu Mus'ab Az-ZarqawT 

52 



The Expedition ofSliayl<li 'Umar Hadid 
Al-Qa'idah In 'Iraq 

Al-lmam Ahmad Ibn NasrAI-Khuzd'T, A Leader of Scholars, A Leader of Martyrs 
Al-Hafith Ibn KathTr, Commentary by S/?o)//f/? Abul-Munthir As-Sa'idTOf /4/-Jo/77o'o/?/4/- 
Isldmiyyah Al-IVIuqdtilah (Libya) 

"So Give the Bay'ah for Death" 
Words Regarding the IVIanhaj 
Abu Jandal AI-AzdT 

The Abandonment of IVIasdjid Adh-Dhirdr 

Shaykh Abu Qatadah AI-FilistmTwith commentary from S/7oy/ch Abu BasTr At-TartusT 

AI-iHaqq Wal-Yaqm FT 'Addwat At-TOghat Wal-IVIurtaddm 
Shoy/ch Sultan AI-'UtaybT 

Declaration to the Egyptian Nation in Particular and to the Arab and Muslim Nations in 

General 

Shaykh Ahmad Shakir 

The Game of the Pharaohs 
Shaykh Paris Az-Zahranl 

The Giant Man 

Shaykh Husayn Ibn Mahmud 

Evaluation of the Islamic, JihddT Movements of Palestine 
Abu Jandal AI-AzdT 

Islam Is Our Citizenship! 
Al-Qa'idah in 'Iraq 

53 



Say No to the Oppressor 
Shaykh 'Umar Abdur-Rahman 

Farewell O Abdullah! RashOd! 
SayfuddTn AI-KinanT 

Interview With the Commander Abdul AzTz Al-Muqrin 
Sawt Al-Jihdd Magazine 

Rearguards - You Are On Good! 
Salih Ibn Sa'd Al-Hasan 

Explanation of the Hadith: "The strong believer is better..." 
At-Tibyan Publications 

Letter To Mulld Muhammad 'Umar From The Scholars 

Shaykh Sulayman Ibn Nasir Al-'Ulwan, Shaykh Hamud Ibn 'Abdillah Ash-Shu'aybT, 

Shaykh 'AIT ibn Khudhayr Al-Khudhayr 

The Islamic Awakening 
Shaykh Husayn Ibn Mahmud 

From the Rulings of Ahl Ath-Thimmah 
Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim 

Strangle the last Arab tyrant... with the entrails of the last palace scholar! 
LuwTs 'Atiyyatullah 

This is Our 'AqJdah 

Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT 



54 



Condemnation of the Democratic Process, Voting, and tiie Islamic Stances on These Issues 
Shaykh Abu Qatadah AI-FilistTnT 

A Message To Every Youth 
Shaykh Abdullah 'Azzam 

The Greatest Blessing 

Shaykh Abdullah Ibn Muhammad Ar-Rashud 

A Call to Migrate from the Lands of the Disbelievers to the Lands of the Muslims 
Shaykh Abdul-AzTz Al-Jarbu' 

The Role of the Women in Fighting the Enemies 
Shaykh Yusuf Ibn Salih AI-'UyayrT 

A Day in My Life - And the Truth About a Commander 
Muhibb As-Sunnah AI-'IraqT 

Advice on the New Book Allegedly by Shaykh 'Abdul-Qddir Ibn 'Abdil-'AzJz 
Shaykh Husayn Ibn Mahmud 

Jihad and the Effects of Intention Upon It 
Shaykh 'Abdul-Qadir Ibn 'Abdil-'AzTz 

Series: Ahkdm Ad-Diydr 

Shaykh 'Abdul-Qadir Ibn 'Abdil-'AzTz 

Escape From Bagram - Parts 1 and 2 
Labbayk Media 

Witness Some of the Miracles of the Mujdhidln in Kuwait 
Unknown Author 

55 



The Most Important Differences Between Jihad At-Talab and Jihad Ad-Daf 
Shayiih Husayn Ibn Mahmud 

The Jaza' of Allah VS The Jaza' of the Taghut 
Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT 

Balancing Between Jihad And Seeking Knowledge 
Shaykh Abu Yahya AI-LTbT 

The Invalidity of Making Takfir Based on the Dar 
Shaykh Abu Muhammad AI-MaqdisT 

Characteristics of the Victorious Party In the Foundation of the State of the Believers (The Land 

of Ash-Sham) 

Shaykh Abu Qatadah AI-FilistmT 

To the One Who Falls Into Imprisonment: Messages of Advice 
Abu Usamah AI-HazTn 

Prepare An Answer For The Question! 
Shaykh 'Abdullah Ibn Muhammad Ar-Rashud 

How Similar Is Today to Yesterday! 

(Full Translation of the Audio Khutbah "Baghdad Between Two Falls") 

Dr. Raghib As-SirjanT 

The Scholars of the Najdf Da'wah on the Differentiation Between Establishing the Hujjah (Proof) 
and Understanding the Hujjah (Proof) 

At-Tibyan Publications 

A Proclamation to the People Over the Events in Palestine 
A group of scholars and callers in Egypt 

56