(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Open Source Books | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

Anonymous User (login or join us)Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Screen acting"

I 

California 

gional 

nlity 



SCREEN ACTING 



COPYBICHT, 1921 

PHOTO-STAR PUBLISHING CO. 
Los ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 




The Author and Daughter Mary 



SCREEN ACTING 

BY 

MAE MARSH 

OF 

"THE BIRTH OF A NATION," "INTOLERANCE," "POLLY OF THE 
CIRCUS," "THE CINDERELLA MAN," ETC. 



ILLUSTRATED 



LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 
PHOTO-STAR PUBLISHING CO. 

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BUILDING 
All Rights Reserved 



FOREWORD 

IN her travels and through her amazing 
to put it mildly correspondence, the mo- 
tion picture star finds that there is every- 
where a great curiosity about screen acting. 

What does it require? What, if any, are its 
mysteries? What system of detail is there 
that permits fifty-two hundred feet of celluloid 
ribbon to spin smoothly past the eye to make 
an interesting story ? 

I look upon this book as an answer to the 
thousands of letters I have received in the past 
several years asking as many thousands of 
questions. A motion picture star's most inti- 
mate audience, after all, is her correspondence. 

There comes to her sometimes the vague re- 
alization that in a dozen different countries 
little children, their sisters, their brothers and 
their parents may be, at one moment, viewing 
her image upon the screen in a dozen different 
plays. It is all too stupendous ; too impersonal. 
But. though she cannot be a breathing part of 
these audiences she learns often what is in the 
hearts of many. This message comes through 
the mails; that is her broad point of contact 
with her international public. 

IX 



Five years ago these letters were largely to 
request photographs and the star could tell 
something of her popularity by the number of 
pictures mailed out. But, as the screen has 
grown in importance and merit, the star's cor- 
respondence has indicated a lively curiosity in 
the art of camera-acting. So much ambition ; 
so many questions ! 

I have often thought that to make a satis- 
factory reply to the thousands of questions I 
have been asked would be to write a book, and 
well, I wrote it. I have tried to outline the 
important steps in the building of a screen 
career. In doing this I have evaded technical 
phraseology. It is not indispensable to a 
knowledge of screen technic and might tend to 
confuse. 

I believe that anyone desiring a career in 
motion pictures can profit by that which I have 
written out of my experience; that others can 
learn from it something of the work-a-day life 
of the screen actress. 

In conclusion I would take this opportunity 
to thank the tremendous number of children 
and grown-ups who have at one time or an- 
other written me. They serve always to re- 
mind me that those of us upon the screen have 
an influence and responsibility that go beyond 
a mere make-believe. 

MAE MARSH. 



Contents 

Chapter Page 

I. The Universal Impulse 15 

II. Stars and Meteors 23 

III. Seven Qualities 33 

IV. Beauty and Expression 43 

V. Story, Make-up, Costuming 51 

VI. Noses, Chins and Eyes 61 

VII. Camera-Consciousness and Such 73 

VIII. Emphasis and Repression 81 

IX. Long Shots, Intermediates and Close-ups. . 91 

X. About Atmosphere 101 

XL Mr. Griffith 109 

XII. Home Life of the Star.. , .121 



XI 



Illustrations 

Page 
The Author and Mary Frontispiece 

Lillian Gish and the late Robert Harron 27 

Charles Ray 37 

Mary Miles Minter 47 

Mary Pickford 55 

Madame Nazimova 65 

Blanche Sweet and Wallace Reid 77 

Norma Talmadge 85 

The Author and Some Beginners 95 

Gloria Swanson and Thomas Meighan 105 

Mr. Griffith 113 

The Author at Home . . . . 125 



JUII 



MAE MARSH, MOTION PICTURE ACTRESS 



'T'HE arts are old, old as the stones 

From which man carved the sphinx austere. 
Deep are the days the old arts bring: 
Ten thousand years of yesteryear. 

II 

C// is madonna in an art 

As wild and young as her sweet eyes: 
A frail dew flower from this hot lamp 
That is today's divine surprise. 

Despite raw lights and gloating mobs 
She is not seared: a picture still: 

Rare silk the fine director's hand 
May weave for magic if he will. 

When ancient films have crumbled like 

Papyrus rolls of Egypt's day, 
Let the dust speak: "Her pride was high, 

All but the artist hid away: 

"Kin to the myriad artist clan 

Since time began, whose work is dear." 
The deep new ages come with her, 
Tomorrow's years of yesteryear. 

Nicholas Vachel Lindsay. 

From "THE CHINESE NIGHTINGALE 
and other Poems" by Vachel Lindsay. 
Published by The MacMillan Company. 



XIV 



CHAPTER I 

The dilemma of a casting director A Hood of letters 
and their four objectives What every- 
one wants to know. 

WHEN MR. ADOLPH KLAUBER, former dra- 
matic critic of the New York Times, was cast- 
ing director for a big picture corporation I 
chanced to meet him one day in the Fort Lee 
Studios. 

"Read this," he said, tendering me a letter. 

It was from a young girl in Columbus, Ohio, 
as I remember, who wanted to know how she 
could get into motion pictures. It was not so 
much the letter as a small snap-shot photo- 
graph of herself which she had pinned to her 
missive that took my attention. 

The picture showed a girl in a sitting posi- 
tion, who was plump to the verge of fatness. 
She had thick legs and ankles, straight hair, 
probably brown, and dark eyes. So far as a 
front view divulged her features were fairly 
regular. It was not in any way a remarkable 
picture. Nor did it promise any particular 
animation in its subject. 

15 



16 SCREEN ACTING 

She had written to ascertain "what chance 
she would have in motion pictures." 

"What are you going to answer?" I asked 
of Mr. Klauber. 

"That's a poser," he replied. "I was about 
to write her that she didn't have any chance; 
that she probably would be happier if she re- 
mained home; certainly so until she obtained 
her parents' consent for plans of a career. 
Looking at the picture I should say she had 
one chance in a million." 

"That is probably true," I said. 

"But do you know," continued Mr. Klauber, 
"that the more I think of it the less I believe 
that I am endowed with authority to tell any- 
one that he or she has no chance in motion 
pictures. How can I know? We see about 
us every day celebrated stars who, perhaps, 
began their career with apparently no more 
chance than this little Columbus girl." 

Mr. Klauber paused. 

"For that reason I have not sent the dis- 
couraging letter which it was on the tip of my 
pen to write," he continued. "Instead I am 
going to send her a letter telling her that her 
chance of screen success is altogether proble- 
matical ; that everything depends upon circum- 
stance, hard work and the native talent that 
is developed before the camera." 

"I should like to see a copy of that letter," 
I said. 



SCREEN ACTING 17 

I never happened to see Mr. Klauber's reply 
to the girl in Columbus. But I am sure it was 
interesting. 

In the past eight years I have received hun- 
dreds of thousands of letters from motion pic- 
ture fans in every part of the world. In an- 
swer now to a question I have often heard 
asked, "Does a motion picture star immediately 
read all her mail?" I can say for myself, 
"Bless you, no." 

A single mail has brought as many as a thou- 
sand letters and I shall leave it to the reader 
to determine how one could possibly read one 
thousand letters and arrive at the studio at 
8:30 o'clock. Personally, my secretaries are 
instructed to attend to such fan letters as re- 
quest a reply which practically all of them do 
and then preserve the letters that I may read 
them in leisure moments. 

In that way I have managed I think to per- 
use at one time or another the majority of the 
letters that come to me. I find the reading of 
them a great pleasure. 

It is nice to receive pleasant compliments on 
one's hard and honest effort to do something 
worth while. I have on many occasions found 
helpful criticism in my mail. Almost anyone 
can dismiss a picture with a "I liked it" or "I 
didn't like it." There is the exceptional one 
in a thousand who will tell you he didn't like 
it and why, placing his finger upon a real de- 
fect. Often that is a help. 



18 SCREEN ACTING 

To get back to my point : The letters I re- 
ceive seem to be written with one, and some- 
times all of the following objectives 

1. To request a photograph. 

2. To request an autographed photograph. 

3. To ask for "old clothes." 

4. To find out how "I can learn to act for 
motion pictures." 

As for Numbers 1 and 2, the many of you 
who are making a "collection" know that a pic- 
ture, autographed if requested, is sent you in 
due time. Up to very recently the star has 
considered it a matter of good advertising to 
remember those friends who are kind enough 
to ask for photographs. But the demand for 
pictures has become so tremendous that some 
of the stars are now making a flat charge of 
twenty-five cents for their photographs. This 
barely covers the cost of production and post- 
age. 

It was Miss Billie Burke, I believe, who was 
first to establish a cost charge on her photo- 
graphs. She did this during the war and 
donated the receipts to charity. 

The most of us have feared to risk offending 
those picture fans who have been at the pains 
of writing us by asking them for a photo- 
graphic fee. We have spent from $10,000 to 
$25,000 a year out of our own pockets unless 
by our contracts our producers agreed to bear 
this expense and have trusted that it was 
money well expended. In the amount of pleas- 



SCREEN ACTING 19 

ure brought to the little ones I, for one, am 
sure it has been. 

But, as the demand for pictures grows 
greater and letters pour in from all parts of 
the world, the cost of materials has been stead- 
ily climbing. In 1915 I could send out three 
photographs for what it now costs to send one. 
That means something when thousands of 
photo-mailers each month are being sent to a 
dozen different countries. 

Recently a well known star, a particular 
friend of mine, declared that it was but a mat- 
ter of months before all the more popular stars 
would institute a photographic fee. 

As to Number 3, regarding old clothes, I am 
sure that while the requests emanate from 
worthy sources no star could possibly satisfy 
these many supplications. 

To begin with if the story calls for clothes 
that are actually old old enough to be consid- 
ered "costumes" they are usually supplied by 
the producer and belong to him after produc- 
tion. In the case of modern clothes meaning 
new ones most stars are very pleased to wear 
them themselves when they have finished be- 
fore the camera. 

Such is mine own case. Whenever there is 
any danger of my reaching a point of clothes 
saturation I have several growing sisters who, 
so far, have been able to handle the situation. 
After that our clothes go through certain pre- 
arranged channels of charity. 



20 SCREEN ACTING 

I make this point in the hope that many 
young ladies who have written me for my "old 
clothes" will understand that I have few or 
none, as much as I should like to accommodate 
each one of them. 

Which brings me to Number 4. 

"How can I learn to act for motion pic- 
tures?" Six years ago in "The Birth of a 
Nation" days my mail brought me many such 
inquiries. Since then, with the motion pic- 
ture steadily gaining in favor, I have been 
swamped with this universal request. 

"Do brown eyes photograph better than 
blue?" "Is it necessary to have stage training 
to act before a camera?" "Can a girl with a 
big nose succeed in the movies?" "What is 
the accepted height for a motion picture star ?" 
"Are the morals of motion pictures safe for 
the average girl?" "If I came to Hollywood 
and got work as an extra how long would it 
be before I am featured?" "Do you know any 
director who will star a small girl, of blond 
type, who has played parts in high school come- 
dies?" "Are the star salaries we hear of the 
real thing?" "Does Charlie Chaplin make 
$1,000,000 a year?" 

I have picked at random these few questions. 
I think I could go on and on, farther than Mr. 
Tennyson's charming brook, with others of the 
same kind. Sometimes I am given to the 
thought that every young girl in the United 
States wants to go into motion pictures. 



SCREEN ACTING 21 

Possibly I am right. You know as well as I. 
Receiving so many of these letters I have be- 
gun to feel as Mr. Klauber felt. I don't know 
exactly what to say. 

But since there are undoubtedly many thou- 
sands of boys and girls not only in the United 
States but in foreign countries the Japanese 
boy, for instance, is particularly keen on know- 
ing the how of motion picture acting who 
would like to get into motion pictures, I feel 
that such information as I have acquired 
through a wide experience will interest many 
and perhaps prove of value to those others 
who are destined to be our cinema stars of 
tomorrow. 

As for my qualifications I was about to say 
that I am one of the motion picture pioneers. 
Yet when I say pioneer I think of Daniel 
Boone. And Mr. Boone, had he lived, would 
have been an old, old man. 



CHAPTER II 

The myth of the "overnight" star An instance of 

success after long sustained effort 

What the beginner faces. 

To BECOME an artistic success one must as- 
suredly be in love with the art he has elected 
to follow. In business or finance a so-called 
lucky stroke may make of a man or a woman 
a success without there being those qualities 
of esteem and enthusiasm for the thing itself 
that are so essential to artistic endeavor. 

Such lucky strokes are rare in pictures. Ap- 
pearances to the contrary, notwithstanding, 
motion picture stars are not made over-night. 
Every now and then some actor or actress be- 
gins to assert his or her right to cinema star- 
dom. But if one will take the trouble to ex- 
amine the records in such cases he will usually 
find that the privilege of stardom has come 
only after a slow climb. 

There have been cases where producers have 
tried to "manufacture" stars. But, in the 
main, it hasn't worked. 

23 



24 SCREEN ACTING 

To recall one example : One of the shrewd- 
est of our producers not long ago signed a 
young, beautiful and talented vaudeville act- 
ress to a long time motion picture contract. 
Screen tests proved that she photographed 
beautifully. She had the grace of carriage to 
be expected of the professional dancer. Her 
face was expressive. That a capable director 
would find in her all the qualities necessary 
for stardom the producer never doubted. 

Thousands of dollars were spent in an ocean 
of advertising ink announcing the debut of this 
star. Her name was flashed from one end of 
the country to the other, indeed, around the 
world, in electric lights and on bill boards. 
Her photograph was published in the metro- 
politan dailies and small town papers. So far 
as the campaign was concerned it was an un- 
qualified success. By the time the little star's 
first picture was ready for release there had 
been built up about her a tremendous curiosity. 

I own I was as curious as the next. I think 
the majority of us, who had attained stardom 
only after years of rigorous training, self 
denial and hard work, were interested, even 
anxious, to know if motion picture stars could 
be developed after the formula of this pro- 
ducer. It meant something to us. 

If the magnitude of the motion picture act- 
ress was to be in proportion to the size of an 
introductory advertising campaign then our 
own position was none too secure. 



SCREEN ACTING 25 

As a star this little actress failed. Thanks 
to some natural talent her failure was not so 
disastrous as it might have been. But as a 
star, she was soon withdrawn. The fortune 
spent in exploiting her was gone, but not for- 
gotten. As a proof of the impossibility of 
"manufacturing" stars under the most favor- 
able of circumstances it probably served a pur- 
pose. 

Why did she fail ? Why would a baby, who 
had never walked, fail if she were told to run 
a foot race ? She simply didn't know how. 

All the little important things that one can 
learn by nothing save experience, things which 
mean everything to successful screen acting, 
were missing in her work. She was like one 
trying to paint without knowing color, to com- 
pose without a knowledge of counter-point, to 
write without having learned grammar school 
English. Contrary to a tradition which exists 
in some localities the best swimmers are not 
developed by throwing the child into the water 
and telling him to sink or float. 

There is another interesting point in the case 
which I have cited. When the plans to make 
this young lady an over-night star failed she 
became a featured player in a group. Sur- 
rounded by experienced, capable screen actors 
and relieved of the responsibility that stardom 
entails she has developed splendidly and is, in 
point of fact, a better actress today than she 
was when she was. advertised as a star. 



26 SCREEN ACTING 

It has been simply a matter of training. If 
sometime in the future she is again starred she 
will be prepared to make a better job of it. 

I have brought up this case because it has 
been my observation that there exists a feeling 
that in motion pictures anybody can be a star 
anytime. There is talk of influence, mana- 
gerial favoritism, luck and, goodness knows, 
what not? There may be truth to some of 
these assertions. 

But the year in and year out stars Mary 
Pickford, Dorothy and Lillian Gish, William 
Hart, Mine. Nazimova, Douglas Fairbanks, 
Charles Ray ,etc. are those who stand solidly 
on the ground of genuine merit. 

And the solidity of their stance is usually 
determined by the amount of their natural tal- 
ent, plus the excellence and length of their 
training. 

I believe many people have the habit of fall- 
ing in love with an idea. The idea of becom- 
ing a motion picture star is appealing. But 
like many other general conceptions the idea 
of the star's life as gathered from a smoothly 
displayed picture drama or a magazine article 
portraying the artist's home, her automobile 
and her pets is misleading. 

Robert Louis Stevenson wept in despair over 
the composition of many of his stories. A 
great many of us have had occasion to weep 
over our own more modest efforts. We have 
found, indeed, that the most beautiful roses 




Lillian Gish and the late Robert Harron in a love scene 
from "The Greatest Question." 



SCREEN ACTING 29 

are very often those with the crudest thorns. 

It has been proved that motion picture stars 
cannot be made over-night. It is equally true 
that many promising actresses do not become 
stars in the accepted professional sense of the 
word even after long years of work. 

I suppose if I said that nobody can succeed 
in motion pictures and that the star is the ex- 
ception to the rule I should be accused of being 
a pessimist. Yet that is more nearly the truth 
than may appear on the surface. 

Consider, for instance, the thousands of act- 
ors and actresses who have appeared before a 
camera in the past decade. After you have 
done that count the number of genuine stars 
now before the public. You can name the ma- 
jority of them on the fingers and thumbs of 
four hands. 

Yet in the heart of each of the thousands, 
who have stepped before the batteries of mo- 
tion picture cameras, there was undoubtedly 
the hope that natural ability, circumstance or 
hard work would bring success. 

It is well to take this into consideration when 
one looks toward the screen for a career. 

But sometimes this law of average is de- 
feated by that exceptional person whose faith 
is undiminished, whose confidence in one's self 
is boundless and whose capacity for work 
never flags. 

Let me cite you the case of one of the best 
known young actresses on the screen who, as 



30 SCREEN ACTING 

this is written, has never enjoyed the full priv- 
ileges of stardom though she has shared most 
of its disadvantages. 

She began her screen career more than a 
half dozen years ago. She was frail, and slow 
to absorb the lessons of the screen. Even her 
dearest friends never imputed to her a great 
natural acting talent. 

But this young lady was dauntless. She 
kept everlastingly at it. By systematically ex- 
ercising she gradually built up strength and 
endurance. When she was given a part she 
read everything she had access to which would 
help her in the development of her character 
portrayal. 

She over-came any tendency toward self- 
consciousness while before the camera. She 
became adept in the matter of thinking up busi- 
ness. The fact that she did not attain star- 
dom, in its generally accepted sense, never de- 
terred her. Year after year she gave to the 
screen and to her parts the best that was in 
her. 

Her courageousness has been rewarded. It 
is my opinion that in the past two years she 
had contributed to the photographic drama two 
of its most distinguished characterizations. 
She is a motion picture star in the true sense 
of the word. Her name is Lillian Gish. 

If I seem to be gazing on the darker side of 
a screen career I assure you that it is not be- 
cause such is my habit. Quite the contrary. 



SCREEN ACTING 31 

But it appears to me that since there seems to 
be such a universal impulse to gain fame 
through the medium of the moving picture 
drama that it is as well to consider some of its 
difficulties. 

Trained actors and actresses from the 
spoken stage to their sorrow have found these 
difficulties. The established star finds some- 
times that success has seemed merely to double 
her troubles. 

The beginner will discover, therefore, that 
when he or she sets his or her face toward a 
screen career there will come moments when 
it will seem much easier to give up than go on. 
Those who give up will be those who should 
never have started. They will have wasted 
time that could have been otherwise more 
profitably spent. 

Those who go on well, there is always hope 
for such. 



I am always interested in and can sympa- 
thize with the young girl who yearns for a 
career. It seems but yesterday that I was in 
short skirts and Miss Marjorie Rambeau was 
the most talented and beautiful actress that 
was ever permitted upon the face of the earth. 
After a matinee at the old Burbank theater in 
Los Angeles a young girl friend and I often 
followed Miss Rambeau discreetly and at what 
might be called a worshipful distance. 



32 SCREEN ACTING 

Then there was Mr. Richard Bennett. 
What a masterful, handsome man was he! 
My goodness! he was one to occupy one's 
dreams; to make one wonder if somehow it 
might not be possible to grow up and become 
his leading lady. I am sure that the very par- 
agon of modern-day leading men could not 
come up to my childhood estimate of Mr. Rich- 
ard Bennett. 



CHAPTER III 

Seven qualities that indicate fitness for a screen career 
Why they are important An illus- 
tration of vitality. 

As I HAVE said, I have been asked by thous- 
ands of correspondents for the formula for 
screen success. I have never felt able to an- 
swer. I don't believe there is any such 
formula. 

Putting the proposition another way : 

If I were requested to choose from among 
ten beginners the one who would go the farth- 
est in motion pictures I should unhesitatingly 
lay my finger upon the one who possessed the 
following qualifications : 

(1) Natural talent. 

(2) Ambition. 

(3) Personality. 

(4) Sincerity. 

(5) Agreeable appearance. 

(6) Vitality and strength. 

(7) Ability to learn quickly. 

33 



34 SCREEN ACTING 

I am sure that I should not go far wrong if 
I were to place my trust in one endowed with 
these qualities. 

A natural talent for acting implies more 
than a mere desire to act. It is the art, 
usually discovered during childhood, of mim- 
icry, and the joy in that art. 

How many of us have been convulsed in our 
earlier years at some school girl friend's take- 
off of our teacher ? How many of us, indeed, 
have played the mimics ? I seem to remember 
that in my grammar school days I was called 
upon more or less to take-off one of our 
teachers. 

If not called upon I volunteered. None of 
my school chums got more enjoyment out of 
my "imitation of Miss Blank" than I did. I 
never dreamed at that time or, if I did, they 
were vague dreams that I was to become an 
actress. Since then I have come to the con- 
clusion that I was actually taking my first steps 
toward what I chose as a career. 

Natural talent, as I have called it, is no more 
than a tendency toward, or an aptitude for, 
some form of endeavor. In youth my first 
artistic loves were for mimicry and painting 
the latter of which took the form of sculptur- 
ing and both of these loves have been en- 
during. 

For that reason unless my candidate for 
screen success had previously shown some love 
for acting or mimicry I should come to the con- 



SCREEN ACTING 35 

elusion that he or she was intoxicated merely 
with the glamour of the profession, with no 
especial love for the fundamental thing itself. 

This is an important point. If its signif- 
icance were duly impressed upon the thousands 
of girls and boys, who would like to choose the 
screen for a career, perhaps, some of them 
would abandon their dreams and turn to things 
for which they have displayed some natural 
aptitude. 

Ambition must, of course, go hand in hand 
with natural talent. In any form of vocational 
training it is assumed that the student has a 
feverish desire to succeed in the particular line 
that he has elected to follow. It is the same 
on the screen. 

Possibly I might have written down enthus- 
iasm in the place of ambition. After one has 
attained stardom and thus, perhaps, achieved 
his or her ambition the ability to sustain en- 
thusiasm in one's work becomes more import- 
ant than ambition. But ambition and enthus- 
iasm are closely correlated. 

They mean that one has an ambition to gain 
the top, and that to reach that position one has 
the enthusiasm to practise all the forms of self- 
denial, discipline and study that are important 
to artistic success in any line. 

Personality is important for the reason that 
the camera has a way of registering it un- 
erringly. It is keen in detecting the weak or 
vapid. 



36 SCREEN ACTING 

In my eight years before a motion picture 
camera I have never met a person of inferior 
fibre whose inferiority was not accentuated by 
the camera. For that reason to sustain suc- 
cess on the screen I believe there is nothing 
more important than clean thoughts and clean 
living. They do register. 

It is precisely the same with sincerity. In 
any line there is probably little hope for those 
who lack this salient quality. But a motion 
picture camera seems especially to delight in 
exposing insincerity. 

I think considerable of the success of Mary 
Pickford and Charles Ray to name but two 
stars is due to their absolute and abundant 
sincerity. The camera, finding so much that 
is clean and real, has jovously reproduced it. 
It is the love that Miss Pickford radiates from 
the screen and the obvious manliness of Mr. 
Ray that are among their biggest assets. This 
is sincere love and sincere manliness, or it 
would never be so emphasized by the camera. 

My candidate for screen honors, therefore, 
must have the God-given quality of sincerity. 
Only that kind can feel deeply, think cleanlv 
and develop the sterling traits without which 
neither a camera or a public can be very long 
deceived. 

I now come to the matter of personal ap- 
pearance. This is a topic in which every man 
under 65, and every woman under 100 vears 
seem interested. I sometimes wonder if it is 




o 

as 

"a 

5 
I 

I 



e 



8 




SCREEN ACTING 39 

not the desire to see how they would look on 
the screen, rather than how they might act, 
that fills so many boys and girls and men and 
women with an ambition for a screen career. 

I have found the subject of such universal 
interest that I believe it deserves a chapter to 
itself. Therefore I shall dismiss this matter 
until the next. I may say, however, that in 
my candidate I should rank agreeable appear- 
ance and an expressive face as superior to mere 
beauty. 

To paraphrase, nothing succeeds like good 
health. Of itself it is the most valuable thing 
that we should own. Good health can be 
translated into terms of capacity for work. 
Therefore since a screen career means both 
hard and trying work I should insist that my 
candidate possess or develop the qualities of 
strength and vitality. 

I am aware that in many forms of art such 
artists as Chopin, Stevenson and Milton, have 
become famous in spite of great physical hand- 
icaps. I do not believe the same can be done 
in pictures. 

It seems to me that healthy persons like to 
see and be among well people. Motion picture 
audiences being invariably in first-class phy- 
sical shape themselves, desire that those who 
appear before them on the screen be likewise 
fortunate. It is my belief that an audience 
is usually bored to tears by a convalescing hero 
or heroine. If I were in charge of all the 



40 SCREEN ACTING 

scenarios played I should cut such episodes 
very short. They beget more impatience than 
sympathy. 

But it is not only because good health rad- 
iates from the screen that it is important. In 
point of nervous and muscular strain, and the 
often long studio hours that are necessary 
when production has begun, good health is 
essential. 

To illustrate : While we were filming "Polly 
of The Circus" in Fort Lee one morning I re- 
ported at the studio at nine o'clock. We were 
working on some interior scenes that were 
vital to the success of the story. My director 
at that time was Mr. Charles Horan. Mr. 
Vernon Steele was playing the male lead. 

That day we became so engrossed in playing 
some rather delicate scenes that before we 
knew it or at least before I could realize it 
it was six o'clock, and we weren't half done. 

"What do you say to continuing?" asked 
Mr. Horan. 

"Good; we're right in the spirit of it," I 
replied. 

We had a bite to eat and worked on until 
midnight. In spite of our hard and earnest 
efforts there were several scenes with which 
we were dissatisfied. 

"Well," said Mr. Horan ruefully. "Tomor- 
row will be another day." 

As he spoke it dawned upon me how one of 



SCREEN ACTING 41 

the scenes on which we felt we had failed could 
be done with probable success. 

"Why tomorrow?" I replied. "Let's make 
a night of it if necessary. We simply have to 
get that scene." 

Mr. Horan grinned. That had been his 
wish. But he had feared breaking the camel's 
back. 

We worked until four o'clock that morning. 
Things went swimmingly. It was broad day- 
light when I ferried across the Hudson but if 
I was very tired I was equally happy. 

Several times during "Polly of the Circus" 
we had experiences which, in the number of 
hours put in, were similar to that which I have 
related. But in the end it was worth while. 
We had a picture. 

At that time I was feeling in the best of 
health but, even so, the long hours had been a 
severe drain upon my none too great vitality. 
For anyone lacking strength and vitality such 
hours would have been impossible. 

It is not my intention to write a booklet on 
health. But all of us should be very careful 
of our most precious possession. I know of so 
many young girls in motion pictures who have 
let their health get away from them. And 
some of the cases are so pitiful. . . . 

My candidate, then, will have strength and 
vitality and, equally important, he or she will 
cling to both, whatever social sacrifices may 
have to be made to preserve them. 



42 SCREEN ACTING 

The ability to learn quickly will save anyone 
going into screen work so much trouble and 
possible humiliation that it may well be listed 
as an essential qualification. 

The screen is no place for the mental lag- 
gard. The beginner, particularly, must be 
alive to learn the new lessons that each day 
will bring, and learning them he must remem- 
ber. 

During the course of production in a studio 
things are at high tension. Time is money. 
Each of us constitutes a more or less impor- 
tant cog in a great machine. Those cogs that 
inexcusably forget to function are eliminated. 



CHAPTER IV 

Beauty and the measure of looks upon the screen 

Expression most important Tragedies of 

doll-faces Photographic "angles." 

WHAT FOLLOWS happened during the Na- 
tional Convention of Motion Picture Pro- 
ducers in 1917 at Chicago. The convention 
was held at the Coliseum. There were jazz 
bands, gay and costly decorations, and motion 
picture celebrities from both Coasts. The car- 
nival spirit ran high and thousands of motion 
picture fans squeezed into that huge old build- 
ing. 

The opening was called "Mae Marsh Day." 
I shall not soon forget it. That night as our 
party entered the Coliseum through the mana- 
ger's private office I espied in the center of the 
building a newly erected platform draped with 
bunting and decorated with flowers. 

"You will make a little speech," the manager 
said. 

I gasped. I think I almost fainted. I had 
never made a formal speech. The idea of it 

43 



44 SCREEN ACTING 

was as foreign to me as becoming Queen of 
the South Sea Islands. 

"All right," I gurgled weakly. 

My voice has never been strong. As I 
walked to the platform the Coliseum was a 
bedlam of sound. I was introduced with diffi- 
culty. With sinking knees I stepped forward. 

"Ladies and gentlemen I am sure I am 
pleased to " 

A jazz band, which seemed to be located 
somewhere immediately beneath my feet, began 
to loudly play. I didn't know whether to dance 
or sing. It was a medley in which "The Star- 
Spangled Banner" was predominant. I blessed 
the band. I doubly blessed our national an- 
them. Looking about me I saw a small Amer- 
ican flag. I grasped it and stood waving it to 
the strains of our national air. The conven- 
tion was duly opened. 

Afterward, when I stood upon a small table 
giving away carnations until my wrist ached 
smiling like a chorus girl meantime a wom- 
an informed my mother that she wished to see 
me on an important matter. In the press of 
those thousands of children and grown-ups I 
was virtually trapped. 

"Tell her," I suggested, "to call at the Black- 
stone Hotel tomorrow morning." 

She came. She was a plain woman with an 
honest eye. She brought along two small 



SCREEN ACTING 45 

daughters aged, respectively, ten and twelve, 
I afterward ascertained. 

"Miss Marsh," she declared, leaning for- 
ward expectantly in her chair, "I think my two 
daughters should succeed in motion pictures. 
One of them is very beautiful, and the other 
looks like you." 

I told this honest lady, with as straight a 
face as I could command, that while her 
daughters were still too young to think of play- 
ing in motion pictures that some day, perhaps, 
I could do something for them, particularly the 
one that looked like me. 

In approaching the matter of screen faces I 
am strongly reminded of that Chicago lady. I 
believe her logic was essentially sound. There 
is no measure of looks for the motion picture 
screen. If there is a yardstick it applies to ex- 
pression, or animation, and not looks. 

No one admires a beautiful face upon the 
screen more than I. If it so happens that this 
beauty is allied with ability then I am often 
given to the thought that they are not a con- 
genial combination. For beauty, ever a queenly 
quality, is diverting and manages in this way 
and that to steal some of the thunder that 
rightfully belongs to ability. 

If, as sometimes happens, I see mere beauty 
being exploited on the screen with no sem- 
blance of acting talent, I am ready to give up 
my seat to the next one along about the third 
reel. Nothing palls upon one more quickly. 



46 SCREEN ACTING 

Therefore, I am at odds with those who be- 
lieve that beauty is necessary for the screen be- 
ginner. Say for beauty that it has the merit of 
more quickly attracting attention to the one 
who possesses it and you have done it full jus- 
tice. But even then, if it is unaccompanied by 
ability, it is just another tragedy of a doll-face. 

Acting is primarily the ability to express 
something. If the face that conveys that feel- 
ing is not disagreeable then it becomes a matter 
of not how much beauty is in the face but how 
much expression. That was certainly the case 
with Mme. Sarah Bernhardt. All of us know 
plain appearing persons whose faces, when 
they have something to say, become interesting 
and expressive. 

They impress us as individuals whose beauty 
is inside or spiritual. That is a lovely quality 
for the screen. On the other hand we know, 
all of us, persons who are generally considered 
beautiful whose faces, under any circum- 
stances, have no more animation than a mask 
These people strike us as spiritually barren, 
lacking in humor, or something. 

If my candidate for screen honors has sim- 
ply an agreeable appearance and good eyes 
which I consider most important of all facial 
features I shall be satisfied provided his or 
her face, and particularly the eyes, are expres- 
sive. 

It has been my observation that while beauty 
or good looks is largely a matter of opinion 




A beautiful young star and her director, Mary Miles 
Minter and Chester Franklin, 



SCREEN ACTING 49 

which has furnished many lively debates the 
quality of expression or animation is seldom 
denied those who possess it. For that reason 
my candidate, if he or she has an expressive 
face, will have a more valuable and certain 
stock-in-trade than mere good looks. 

In spite of this logic most of us stars go on 
wishing to be thought beautiful, or to have it 
thought that we could be beautiful if we 
wanted to be. I recollect that it took time and 
courage for some of us to brave our publics in 
other than our pet make-ups. 

There are, for instance, two stars who had 
always regarded their curls as indispensable. 
After many years of stardom one of them de- 
cided to take what she thought was a desperate 
chance. She skinned her hair back and played 
the part of a little English slavey. The result 
was that she turned out one of the most suc- 
cessful pictures in her career. 

Another, a dear friend of mine, we used to 
call "The Primper." She never appeared upon 
the set without her curls just so. I think at 
that time she thought they were the most im- 
portant part of her career. 

She has reformed. As her art developed she 
became less particular about her hair dress. 
One night in a little theater in Jamaica, Long 
Island, I dropped in to see one of her photo- 
plays. It was an excellent picture. Her hair 
was drawn back tightly over her head into a 
knot. That night I wired her congratulations. 



50 SCREEN ACTING 

No ; eurls, Grecian noses, up-tilted chins and 
rose-tinted cheeks are not the measure of suc- 
cess upon the screen. It is something that 
goes deeper than that. 

It is something that goes deep enough to 
over-ride facial defects. There is one excel- 
lent little star, for example, who, because of 
a nose unfortunately large, must always work 
full face when near the camera. I think she 
is charming. Another, for an odd reason, per- 
mits only a one-way profile to be taken. There 
are many such cases. 

Indeed, the majority of us have our "an- 
gles." By "angles" I mean the full, three- 
quarters, one-quarter or profile views in which 
we think we appear at our best. Each star has 
studied that point out for his or herself. And, 
since we are taking largely our own opinion for 
it, it is possible we are mistaken. But our 
vanity upholds us. 

In my own case I was hauled into motion 
pictures while sitting rather forlornly on a 
soapbox waiting for my sister Marguerite. 
Since at that time I was without curls, having 
never had any before or since, and looked as I 
look, so to speak, it has never been necessary 
for me to expend any great amount of time in 
make-up. That has been satisfactory to me. 



CHAPTER V 

The story, make-up and costuming Rouge riots and 

their disadvantages The blond 

and the "back spot." 

IN ANY ART or profession the ability to seize 
opportunity when it presents itself is impor- 
tant. This is especially true in motion pictures. 
Things move very fast there. It is like a game 
where the knack of doing the right thing at the 
right time determines one's value. 

After the beginner has done his extra work, 
or small bits, if he is of the right stuff, he will 
some day be given a part. He may be unaware 
of it, but that will be the biggest moment of his 
screen career. 

When doing extra work or small bits the 
critics, the public, and the profession have paid 
little attention to the beginner. But once the 
beginner secures a part he comes instantly into 
the eye of everyone interested in the screen. 
We are all diverted by new faces. 

Thus the impression that the beginner will 
make in his first part is one that will for a long 
time endure. It comes very near making or 

51 



52 SCREEN ACTING 

breaking him. This may seem hard. Often 
it is unjust a beginner may have a part forced 
upon him for which he is unfitted. But it is 
true. And we have to deal with conditions on 
the screen as we find them. 

For that reason when the big moment comes, 
and the part is secured, the beginner must do 
everything within his or her power to be as 
well prepared as possible. 

There are in this respect three important 
mechanical details that must be looked after. I 
should list them as follows : 

( 1 ) Studying the story. 

(2) Studying make-up. 

(3) Studying costuming. 

The beginner will be given the story or 
script typewritten in continuity form. Con- 
tinuity means t he scene by scene action 
through which the story is told. Ordinarily 
there will be some three hundred scenes or 
"shots" to the average photoplay. 

The beginner will first look to the plot and 
theme of the story. We want to know what 
the author is telling and how he is trying to tell 
it. We find the big situations and the action 
that precedes them. More important, we lo- 
cate the why of it. 

When I have established the idea of the play 
I immediately go over the script again with an 
eye alert for business. By business I mean the 
tricks, mannerisms, and the apparent unex- 



SCREEN ACTING 53 

pected or involuntary moves that help to sus- 
tain action. 

The value of good business cannot be over- 
rated. It goes a long way toward making up 
for the lack of voice. Without clever business 
any photoplay would drag. The two-reel com- 
edy, which I have observed is popular with 
audiences of all ages, is usually but a sequence 
of business. 

If the business that is planned upon seems 
natural to the character the wiggling of a 
foot when excited, the inability to control the 
hands, the apparent unconscious raising of an 
eyebrow, etc. I am sure there can be no real 
objection to it. The audience, who are the final 
critics, love it. 

Just the other night I saw Mr. Douglas Fair- 
banks in a play the final scene of which de- 
picted him in the act of making love to his in- 
tended. That there might be some privacy to 
the undertaking they were screening them- 
selves from the view of the guests and the 
audience! with a large silken handkerchief. 

The girl might have stood still. If she had 
there could have no criticism. Neither would 
there have been much of anything else, as her 
face was hidden from view. She laid her hands 
over a balustrade and wiggled her fingers. The 
audience roared. 

These are the things which keep a photoplay 
from dragging. They give the action a piq- 
uancy and charm. 



54 SCREEN ACTING 

Now while the audience may believe that 
these things are done on the spur of the mo- 
ment the facts are very contrary. These bits 
of business must be planned in advance and it 
is only an evidence that they have been well 
planned when they appear to be done uncon- 
sciously. 

While it is true that we have all discovered 
very telling bits of business during the actual 
photographing of a scene, we can count this as 
nothing but good fortune. To leave the matter 
of business until the director called "Camera !" 
would be fatal. 

Thus in going over a script I look for busi- 
ness. I think of all the business I can, knowing 
that much of it will prove impracticable and 
will have to be discarded. Nor is that all. 
When the scenic sets upon which we are to 
work are erected at the studio or on location, 
I look them over very carefully in the hope that 
some article of furniture, etc., will suggest 
some attractive piece of business. An odd fan, 
a pillow, a door, in fact, anything may prove 
valuable. 

I should suggest to my candidate that he 
or she be just as alert for good business as the 
star is. The good director is always open to 
suggestion. Business may make all the differ- 
ence between a colorless and a vivid portrayal 
of a part. Thus for the beginner who, in ob- 
taining a part, has reached the most vital mo- 
ment of his career, the value of keeping an eye 



SCREEN ACTING 57 

open to the possibilities of business is apparent. 

Make-up, like much of everything else on the 
screen, is a personal matter. There are, how- 
ever, some general rules that can be followed 
to advantage. 

I should instruct my candidate not to make 
up too much. It seems to me that I have ob- 
served a tendency in this direction recently. 

Some actresses have laid on lip rouge so 
thickly that their lips seem to run liquid. Rouge 
photographs black. The result has been that 
this riot of lip paint has given them the appear- 
ance of having no teeth. Others have used too 
much and too dark make-up about the eyes. 
Nothing more quickly ruins expression. Such 
eyes have the look of holes burned in a blanket 
and for dramatic purposes are only slightly 
more useful. 

Since my candidate will have youth, good 
health and vitality he or she will not have to 
resort to tricks of make-up. There are many 
such. I recall the case of one actress who is 
considered a beauty on the spoken stage. On 
the screen she discovered that the motion pic- 
ture camera is not very kind to some people. 
The lines and flabbiness which were in her face 
were accurately reproduced. She thought, of 
course, they were exaggerated. 

She was in despair until she found that by 
laying heavy strips of adhesive tape over her 
ears and behind her neck she wore a wig 
these lines and flabbiness were overcome. The 



58 SCREEN ACTING 

tape pulled her face into shape! But, I am 
sure it must have been painful. 

Another actress, it is an open secret, under- 
goes periodic operations for the removal of the 
flabby flesh underneath her chin. Others af- 
flicted with the hated "double chin" rouge the 
guilty member heavily with more or less suc- 
cess. Still others wear collars and necklaces to 
thwart flabbiness. 

None of us need laugh ; that is if we are in 
motion pictures. If we stay there long enough 
we mav be driven to similar measures. 

m 

In make-up, to begin at the top, is to consider 
the hair. Let me say, first of all, that this 
should always be kept very clean. The camera 
has a way of treating us unpleasantly if it 
isn't. 

Some actresses have set styles of hair dress 
which they seldom vary. I think of Madge 
Kennedy's "band of hair," Dorothy Gish's 
black wig and the Pickford Curls. 

Dorothy Gish had tried many styles of hair 
dress and found none of them to her liking. 
She experimented with a black wig and was 
delighted with the result. It contributed some- 
thing to her expression brought it out, as it 
were which she felt had been lacking. Since 
"Hearts of the World" she has never stepped 
before a camera without her trusty B. W. 

But while most of us have a favorite style 
of wearing our hair most of us are forced often 
to lay aside that style to suit the character we 



SCREEN ACTING 59 

are playing. Playing a child we let our hair 
hang. The length or abundance doesn't seem 
to particularly matter. 

If enacting the daughter of a well-to-do 
business man then we may have our hair plain 
or marceled to suit our fancy. Plain hair 
seems to suggest sweetness. If playing a saucy 
character we must contrive some dress that 
will convey the desired effect. 

Blonds, in motion pictures, are traditionally 
fluffy-haired. There is a very good reason for 
this, by the way. Some years ago Mr. Griffith 
who usually does everything first discov- 
ered that by leveling a back spotlight on 
Blanche Sweet's fluffy, blond hair it gave the 
appearance of sunlight showing through. 

On the screen it was beautiful. Since that 
time the "back spot" has been worked to death. 
In spite of the fact that it is an old trick it is 
one that is still very much respected by the 
actress or us blond actresses, as it were. 

The back light shining through the hair has 
a tendency to take away all the hard lines of 
the face. It leaves it smooth and free from 
worry. How often in a motion picture have I 
heard the involuntary expression, "How beau- 
tiful !" when such a shot usually a close-up 
is shown. 

Many of you may have wondered why a 
blond seems to have dark hair in many interior 
scenes and blond hair out of doors. Here is 
one fault, at least, that we can shift to other 



60 SCREEN ACTING 

shoulders. If a blond's hair is dark indoors it 
is because the cameraman has failed in his 
lighting arrangement. 

But even with the most expert manipulation 
of lights there is no rival in motion pictures for 
the sun. For blonds and brunettes alike he is 
Allah. 

And now since this matter of make-up re- 
quires more space and this chapter is growing 
long we shall skip to the next. 



CHAPTER VI 

More about noses and chins Costumes as important 

to the star as a story to the director 

Rags and riches. 

IN THE MATTER of face and make-up we sel- 
dom think of the forehead. Yet I personally 
admire a pretty forehead very much and think 
it is as important as a good mouth or nose, if 
secondary to the eyes. Comprising as it does 
or should one-third of the face it is noth- 
ing if not conspicuous. 

If to be deep and learned is to have an ex- 
tremely high forehead then to be deep and 
learned on the screen is to labor under one defi- 
nite handicap. For the girl with a too high 
forehead cannot skin her hair back without ap- 
pearing ugly. 

Those of us with medium foreheads are 
more fortunate. Whatever may be said for 
our mental capacity we can, at any rate, skin 
our hair back and thereby add very much to 
our expression. 

The girl with the high forehead compro- 
mises by trying to keep some of it covered but 

61 



62 SCREEN ACTING 

it never gives quite the effect of hair drawn 
tightly back. 

I should particularly admonish my screen 
beginner against too much make-up about the 
eyes. For blue or gray eyes, a light gray make- 
up is used; for brown or black eyes, a light 
brown make-up. 

We frequently hear it said that brown eyes 
photograph best for the screen, but I have 
never heard anyone whom I would accept as 
an authority say that. I believe that all colors 
are equally good. It is far more important 
that a screen actress's eyes be expressive than 
it is that they be either brown or blue. 

Thus if we have expressive eyes and evade 
the error of making them up so heavily as to 
create the "burnt hole" aspect we shall have 
nothing to worry about. Generally speaking 
the more prominent the eyes and eyebrows the 
less of make-up should be used. There are ex- 
ceptions. 

A nose is something we can do nothing 
about. We either have or haven't a good nose. 
If the nose is so badly out of symmetry with 
the face as to be unsightly its possessor will 
probably have to confine himself, or herself, 
to character parts. There are some who have 
attained stardom, even with ill-shaped noses, 
but I think of very few. These by devious 
practices conceal the defect as well as possible. 

Make-up for the nose is usually for charac- 
ter and not star parts. A spot of rouge at the 



- SCREEN ACTING 63 

tip of the nose will give it a turned up or pug 
appearance. When playing a mulatto in "The 
Birth of a Nation" Miss Mary Alden inserted 
within her nostrils two plugs that permitted 
her to breathe and yet had the effect of greatly 
widening her nostrils. The late and beloved 
"Bobby" Harron broadened his nose with 
putty in the same play in one of the scenes in 
which he doubled as a negro. The screen lost 
one of its sweetest and most lovable characters 
when "Bobby" Harron died. 

But these cases were characterizations. For 
star purposes a nose is a nose. The pity is 
that sometimes even well-shaped noses seem to 
lose something or gain too much when they are 
reproduced on the screen. 

The lips and chin require a light make-up 
for the very good reason, again, that to overdo 
in this respect is to stifle expression. It is my 
opinion that those who are becoming addicted 
to an extremely heavy make-up of lips are mak- 
ing a mistake. It is unreal. It is not art. Such 
thick, sensuous, liquid lips as I have beheld on 
the screen during the past year have never 
been seen on land or sea. 

The chin is a good deal like the nose. Very 
little can be done about it. If it protrudes too 
much, or is abruptly receding, its possessor 
will probably find himself chosen for character 
parts. Here what are otherwise considered 
facial defects will be no handicap at all. On 
the contrary they may be a decided help. 



64 SCREEN ACTING 

As in the case of the ill-shaped nose there 
are stars who have succeeded in spite of an 
absence, or too great presence, of chin. They 
have learned the photographic angles at which 
they appear to the best advantage. In one way 
or another, when working close to the camera, 
they keep always within these angles. Thus 
they prove that there can be an exception to 
any rule. 

If in the matter of make-up I can convince 
my candidate that he or she will be better off 
by using as little as possible of it, I shall be 
willing to pass on to the next topic. 

Hands, too, must be kept clean and are 
usually made up with white chalk. 

I often think that costumes are to the star 
as important as the story is to the director. 

Whatever may be the case in everyday life 
clothes do make the man, or the woman, in 
motion pictures. They establish character even 
more swiftly than action or expression. No 
where so much as in motion pictures does the 
general public accept people at their clothes 
value. There are the over-dress of vulgarity, 
the shoddiness of poverty, the conservatism of 
decency and so on, each of them speaking as 
plainly as words of the person so attired. 

Now if mere over-dress, shoddiness, con- 
servatism, and so on, were all that were neces- 
sary the process would be quite simple. But 
the art of costuming is more subtle than that. 




Madame Nazimova, one of the few dramatic stars who quickly 
mastered the art of the screen. 



SCREEN ACTING 67 

In each costume there must be something 
original and personal. In other words, some- 
thing that is peculiarly suited to the precise 
character that is being portrayed. There must 
be also a color contrast or harmony that will be 
favorable to good motion picture photography. 

In addition, the costume in a broader sense 
should harmonize with the scenic setting. The 
costume, more than anything else, will estab- 
lish the fiction of age. To appear very young 
or middle-aged is to dress young or middle- 
aged. 

In addition to its value in suggesting char- 
acter the costume has attained a new impor- 
tance in that the screen has become a sort of 
fashion magazine. The thousands of young 
ladies who live outside of New York, London 
or Paris have come to look more and more to 
the screen for the latest fashions, and are ac- 
cordingly influenced. 

With this phase of costuming my candidate 
need not particularly interest herself beyond 
remembering that women love to see pretty 
clothes and that those who give them the op- 
portunity occupy an especial niche in their af- 
fections. 

The beginner who learns the knack of dress- 
ing for the screen in a manner that is sharply 
expressive of the character being played, and, 
in a way to bring out what the actress herself 
has come to regard as her strong point, will 
find her pains rewarded. 



68 SCREEN ACTING 

Mr. Griffith has always been extremely 
painstaking about screen clothes. Even in the 
early days of the old Biograph two-reelers we 
had screen tests for costumes. It was no un- 
usual thing to hear him say, after one of us 
had been at much pains to select a costume 
which we thought did justice to both our part 
and ourselves, "No, that won't do!" Possibly 
we were trying to do too much justice to our- 
selves. 

Anyhow we often had as many as four cos- 
tumes made before Mr. Griffith was suited. 
Then he invariably suggested a ribbon, a fan, 
a bit of old lace, etc., the effect of which upon 
the screen was always pleasing. 

I have been told that one of the sweetest and, 
at the same time, most pathetic scenes done in 
motion pictures occurred in "The Birth of a 
Nation" where I, as Flora Cameron, the little 
sister of the Confederate soldier, trimmed my 
cheap, home-made dress in preparing to wel- 
come home my big brother. 

It was Mr. Henry Walthall, himself a south- 
erner by birth, who suggested this bit of busi- 
ness. 

You will remember the situation. The Cam- 
erons, an old and distinguished Southern fam- 
ily, had been impoverished by the war. They 
were preparing for the return of the big 
brother played capitally by Mr. Walthall 
with the mixture of emotion to be expected 
under the circumstances. I, as the youngest 



SCREEN ACTING 69 

member of the family, was least affected by 
our cruel poverty. The joy of being about to 
see my big brother again overcame any other 
feeling. 

I begin to dress. The sadness of my stricken 
family cannot affect my holiday spirit. I have 
but one dress. It is of sack cloth. I find that 
its pitiful plainness is not in keeping with my 
happiness or the importance of the event. 
Looking about for something with which to 
trim that dress I find some strips of cotton 
"southern ermine," as it was called. With these 
I trim that homely old dress, spotting the "er- 
mine" with soot from the fireplace, in a man- 
ner that I think will be pleasing to my big 
brother. 

Mr. Walthall suggested the "southern er- 
mine" and it was Mr. Griffith, always kindly 
in the matter of accepting a suggestion, who 
built the drama about it. I have had many 
women, from the North as well as the South, 
tell me that to them this scene is the most af- 
fecting they ever have seen in the picture 
drama. I know I have played few, if any, in 
which I have felt more deeply the spirit of 
the action. 

In "The Birth of a Nation," by the way, all 
of us were forced to do a great deal of research 
work upon our costumes. This is a good thing. 
It gets one quickly into the spirit of the drama 
that is to be played. 



70 SCREEN ACTING 

As I say, I have always appreciated the ad- 
vantages of modish dress upon the screen even 
though I have had in my eight years of acting 
only one "clothes" part. By clothes part I 
mean one in which the star dresses in modern 
garments in every scene. I began my career 
as a screen waif with the result that the liter- 
ary men who have to do with the stories picked 
for me, have kept me at this style of part. 

There is never a story written in which a 
poor, little heroine conquers against great odds 
usually after much suffering and not a few 
beatings but that many friends rush to tell 
me that so and so is "a regular Mae Marsh 
part." Such is the power of association. 

Yet I very much enjoyed my one dressed-up 
part. That was "The Cinderella Man." I un- 
derstand that there was great doubt expressed 
by the scenario department that I should be 
able to play such a role for, since the heroine 
was the daughter of a wealthy man, there was 
no occasion for her appearing in rags. 

Miss Margaret Mayo, the well-known dra- 
matist, who wrote "Polly of the Circus," 
"Baby Mine," etc., was here my stanch advo- 
cate. Both she and Mr. George Loane Tucker, 
one of our greatest directors, insisted that I 
could do the part. It was decided to make the 
trial. 

"Go to Lucille," suggested Miss Mayo, "ex- 
plain the story to the designer and let her show 
you the kind of costumes she would suggest." 



SCREEN ACTING 71 

Expense was to be no object. Mr. Tucker 
and I met one afternoon on Fifty-seventh 
street and, entering Lucille's, we went into a 
clothes conference with a designer. The result 
was a mild orgy of beautiful gowns. 

It was decided that Lucille should make two 
dresses of a particular design, one green and 
one gray, as the gown which I was to wear in 
a great many of the scenes. 

Showing that cost does not indicate fitness 
I remember that the gray dress which was 
$100 cheaper than the green was the one 
which we decided to use. My costume bill for 
"The Cinderella Man" exceeded $2,000. There 
are many actresses who spend far more than 
that for clothes on every picture. But com- 
pared with the amount that I had been spend- 
ing in my "poor girl" roles that $2,000 was as 
a mountain to a sand dune. 

"The Cinderella Man" was a great success 
and we were happy; particularly Miss Mayo 
and Mr. Tucker, who had never doubted that 
I could do a dressed-up part. 

The matter of costumes, then, is one of the 
important things that the beginner must con- 
sider. On the screen clothes may be said to 
talk ; even to act. The male artists, I am sure, 
also realize this. But the actress, particularly, 
must always dress in a manner to get the maxi- 
mum of benefit from her clothes whether they 
be cheap or expensive. 



72 SCREEN ACTING 

In "The Birth of a Nation" during the fa- 
mous cliff scene I experimented with a half 
dozen dresses until I hit upon one whose plain- 
ness was a guarantee that it would not divert 
from my expression in that which was a very 
vital moment. 



CHAPTER VII 

Camera- consciousness and a way to cure it Why it is 

fatal to imitate Some scenes 

in "Intolerance." 

THE SEVERAL qualities most likely to succeed 
upon the screen having been discussed, and the 
importance of knowing the story, make-up and 
costuming having been established, my candi- 
date is now ready to go before the camera. 

All that has been done before is but to build 
up to this vital moment. The camera tells at 
once and usually in no uncertain terms whether 
one is possessed of star possibilities. 

It is a sort of court from which there is no 
appeal. For that reason everv exoression, 
every movement, every feeling and, I verily be- 
lieve, every thought are important once the 
camera has begun to turn. 

Now the actress or actor is standing entirely 
upon her or his own feet. Previously they 
have had the benefit of all the advice and help 
that the many departments of a studio could 
proffer. In a word they have been able to 

73 



74 SCREEN ACTING 

lean upon someone else and to correct mis- 
takes at leisure. 

It is different before the camera. The be- 
ginner will at once feel very much alone and 
terribly conspicuous. This tends toward self- 
consciousness, or camera-consciousness, which 
must be immediately overcome or success is 
impossible. Camera-consciousness is the bane 
of the beginner. I think most of us have suf- 
fered more or less from it. I have known 
actresses who possessed it to such a degree 
that, finding they could not rid themselves of 
it, they left the screen. By extreme good for- 
tune this never happened to be one of my trou- 
bles. 

Self-consciousness on the screen is much the 
same thing as stage fright in the spoken drama 
and proceeds, I suppose, from the same source, 
which is the inability to forget one's self. 

When a dear friend of mine first began play- 
ing small parts she found that she suffered 
from it. She also saw that it would certainly 
be fatal if she didn't cure it. 

"For that reason," she said to herself, "the 
best thing to do is to think so hard about the 
part that I am playing that I won't have time 
to think of anything else." 

She gave herself good advice. Anyhow it 
worked and I am sure it will be successful in 
the case of the average beginner. If so, then 
camera-consciousness will really be a blessing 
in disguise, for it will have taught the actress 



SCREEN ACTING 75 

concentration upon her part and concentration, 
in every fiber of one's being, I believe, is the big 
secret of screen success. 

I remember the case of one young actress 
who came to me in tears saying that when she 
rehearsed her part in the privacy of her own 
home, or dressing room, she felt every inch of 
it, but once under the gaze of the director, the 
assistant director, the cameraman, possibly the 
author and perhaps a number of privileged 
persons about the studio, she seemed to wilt. 

"Look at it this way," I advised. "When 
you are acting the director has his work to do 
and is doing it. So has the assistant director. 
Likewise the cameraman and the assistant cam- 
eraman have their work to do and are doing it. 
So are the other actors. As for the lookers-on, 
request that they leave. Then imagine you are 
in a big schoolroom where everyone is busy at 
his or her lessons. You have your lesson to 
get which is concentrating upon your part. Go 
ahead with it." 

It helped the girl in question. She has be- 
come a very excellent and charming star and 
while she still prefers to work upon a secluded 
stage she does not find it positively necessary, 
as do some actresses. In any event there is no 
trace of camera-consciousness in her acting. 

Camera-consciousness having been elimi- 
nated the beginner can now throw himself or 
herself entirely into the part being played. By 
throwing one's self into the part I do not mean 



76 SCREEN ACTING 

forcing it. Nothing is quite so bad as that. I 
mean feeling it. If you do not feel the particu- 
lar action being played then the result will cer- 
tainly be a lack of sincerity. We have already 
decided that that is fatal. 

Let me illustrate : 

While we were playing "Intolerance," one 
cycle of which is still being released as "The 
Mother and the Law," I had to do a scene 
where, in the big city's slums, my father dies. 

The night before I did this scene I went to 
the theater something, by the way, I seldom 
do when working to see Marjorie Rambeau 
in "Kindling." 

To my surprise and gratification she had to 
do a scene in this play that was somewhat simi- 
lar to the one that I was scheduled to play in 
"Intolerance." It made a deep impression 
upon me. 

As a consequence, the next day before the 
camera in the scene depicting my sorrow and 
misery at the death of my father, I began to 
cry with the memory of Marjorie Rambeau's 
part uppermost in my mind. I thought, how- 
ever, that it had been done quite well and was 
anxious to see it on the screen. 

I was in for very much of a surprise. A 
few of us gathered in the projection room and 
the camera began humming. I saw myself 
enter with a fair semblance of misery. But 
there was something about it that was not con- 
vincing. 




."S 



I 






SCREEN ACTING 79 

Mr. Griffith, who was closely studying the 
action, finally turned in his seat and said : 

"I don't know what you were thinking about 
when you did that, but it is evident that it was 
not about the death of your father." 

"That is true," I said. I did not admit what 
I was thinking about. 

We began immediately upon the scene again. 
This time I thought of the death of my own 
father and the big tragedy to our little home, 
then in Texas. I could recall the deep sorrow 
of my mother, my sisters, my brother and my- 
self. 

This scene is said to be one of the most ef- 
fective in "The Mother and the Law." 

The beginner may learn from that that it 
never pays to imitate anyone else's interpre- 
tation of any emotion. Each of us when we 
are pleased, injured, or affected in any way 
have our own way of showing our feelings. 
This is one thing that is our very own. 

When before the camera, therefore, we 
must remember that when we feel great sorrow 
the audience wants to see our own sorrow and 
not an imitation of Miss Blanche Sweet's or 
Mme. Nazimova's. We must feel our own 
part and take heed of my favorite screen 
maxim, which is that thoughts do register. 

It is true that we have good and bad days 
before the camera. There are times when to 
feel and to act are the easiest things imaginable 
and other occasions when it seems impossible 



80 SCREEN ACTING 

to catch the spirit that we know is necessary. 
In this we are more fortunate than our broth- 
ers upon the spoken stage, for we can do it 
over again. 

It is also very often true that even when we 
are entirely in the spirit of our part, and be- 
lieve we have done a good day's work, that 
there will be some mechanical defect in the 
scenes taken which makes it necessary to do 
them over, possibly when we feel least like 
so doing. 

In this event it is a good thing to remem- 
ber that it doesn't pay to cry over spilt milk. 
We must learn to take the bitter with the 
sweet. Fortunately the mechanics of picture 
taking are constantly improving. 

The hardest dramatic work I ever did was 
in the courtroom scenes in "Intolerance." We 
retook these scenes on four different occa- 
sions. Each time I gave to the limit of my 
vitality and ability. I put everything into my 
portrayal that was in me. It certainly paid. 
Parts of each of the four takes some of them 
done at two weeks' intervals were assembled 
to make up those scenes which you, as the audi- 
ence, finally beheld upon the screen. 

Therefore, when first going before a camera 
it is well to resolve to put as much into one's 
performance as possible. We cannot too 
greatly concentrate upon our parts. If we do 
not feel them we can be very sure they will not 
convince our audiences. 



CHAPTER VIII 

Over-acting and a horrible example the value of 

repression and emphasis How we 

act with the body. 

GOOD SCREEN acting consists of the ability to 
accurately portray a state of mind. 

That sounds simple, yet how often upon the 
screen have you seen an important part played 
in a manner that made you, yourself, feel that 
you were passing through the experiences be- 
ing unfolded in the plot. I imagine not often. 

If a part is under-played or, worse, over- 
played for there is nothing so depressing as 
a screen actress run amuck in a flood of sundry 
emotions it exerts a definite influence upon 
you, the audience. 

You begin to lose sympathy with the char- 
acter itself. You are interested or irritated by 
the mannerisms often hardly less than gym- 
nastics of the actor or actress. You never 
identify such an actor or actress with the part 
they are playing for the very good reason that 
they are not playing the part. They are play- 
ing their idea of acting at a part. 

81 



82 SCREEN ACTING 

In any event your interest in the story crum- 
bles. What the author intended as a subtle 
character development flattens out. An inge- 
nious plot is ruined by its treatment. You in- 
dex that particular evening as among those 
wasted. I know. I have done the same. 

For those who would like to take up the 
screen as a career, however, such an evening 
may prove very profitable. For it is the learn- 
ing what not to do that is important. There 
never was a character portrayal done upon the 
screen that could not have been spoiled without 
this knowledge. 

I have in mind a photodrama of 1920 that 
because of the excellence of its plot gained 
quite a success. But for me it was ruined by 
the ridiculous overacting of the heroine. 

She had beautiful dark eyes and seemed to 
think it was a melodrama that the proper 
way to display screen talent was to dilate and 
roll those eyes as though she were constantly 
in terror. 

She had added to that trick one of dropping 
her jaw which I understood to be her idea of 
the way to register astonishment. I cannot 
begin to describe the effect upon me of those 
horrified eyes and open mouth. At the end of 
six reels I felt like screaming. There was no 
time when I should have been surprised had 
she wiggled her ears. 

Either she was unfortunate in her choice of 
a director or he, poor fellow, was powerless to 



SCREEN ACTING 83 

stop her once she had decided upon her pro- 
gram of mouth and eyes. 

One of the first things that a screen actress 
must learn is the value of emphasis. In the 
case that I have cited above the actress threw 
herself emotionally (?) so far beyond the 
mark in little moments that when a big situa- 
tion in the development of the plot occurred 
she had nothing left. The impression conse- 
quently was one of a strained sameness. Than 
that there is no quicker way to wear out one's 
audience. It is like shouting at one who has 
sat down for a quiet chat. The shout should 
be used at no distance less than a city block. 

No screen actress makes a shrewder use of 
emphasis than Norma Talmadge. She seems 
invariablv to hold much in reserve with the re- 

* 

suit that when she does let go in a big emo- 
tional scene the effect is brought home to the 
audience with telling force. There are other 
actresses who play with reserve. But it is im- 
portant that with Miss Talmadge her repres- 
sion seems ever illuminated by the fires of po- 
tential emotion. 

The student of the screen will do well to 
study these matters of emphasis and repres- 
sion. They are all important. Our manner 
of life itself is an accepted repression, outlined 
by laws for the streets and conventions for the 
drawing room. From the screen viewpoint re- 
pression is a vital thing, if for no other reason 
than the fact that it gives the audience a 



84 SCREEN ACTING 

breathing spell. After a breathing spell it is 
the better disposed to appreciate emphasis. 

Whenever I study a scenario or story it is 
with an eyev for the contrast of moods and the 
situations that call for emotional emphasis. I 
plan in advance of the actual camera work the 
pace at which I will play various stages in the 
development of the story. By shutting my eyes 
I can almost see how the part will look upon 
the screen. If there is a sufficient contrast of 
moods and opportunity for emphasis I feel that 
I shall, at least, be able to do all within my 
power to make the story a success. 

The physical strain before a camera is a pe- 
culiar thing. At no time is the motion picture 
actress or actor called upon for a sustained 
performance such as is true on the spoken 
stage. For that reason we should theoreti- 
cally be in condition to put forth our very best 
efforts on each of the short scenes or "shots" 
averaging not over two minutes in photo- 
graphing that we are called upon to do. The 
ordinary director is well satisfied if he aver- 
ages twenty "shots" a day during production. 

But here, I should say, appearances are de- 
ceiving. Genius has been described as the 
ability to resume a mood. In the case of mo- 
tion pictures it is necessary that a mood be re- 
sumed not once or twice, but possibly twenty 
times during a day. 

This is no less important than it is at first 
difficult. There may be an hour or two hours' 




Nortna Talmadge whose acting is notable for its 
admirable repression. 



SCREEN ACTING 87 

interval between scenes often longer than 
that and picking up the thread of the story 
where it was dropped, the actress must resume 
the mood of her characterization. 

I can suggest no better aid to this undertak- 
ing than retiring to one's dressing room and re- 
maining quiet. Absolute quiet is an excellent 
thing for the actress during the working day. 
It gives her a rest from the turmoil of the 
studio set. It provides her a chance to do a 
little mental bookkeeping on the part she is 
playing. I have found it a great help. 

This ability to resume a mood, however, 
soon becomes something that is subconsciously 
accomplished and for that reason need not be 
too much worried over by the beginner. 

There is one quality on the screen that the 
audience always likes. That is vivacity, and 
by vivacity I mean both of the face and the 
body. 

Vivacity in this respect is a lively and likable 
sort of animation which goes a long way 
toward establishing that mercurial quality 
which is known as "screen personality." 

I have never heard anyone give a very good 
definition of "screen personality." The most 
that can be said is that some seem to have it 
and some don't. Certain it is that it is valuable 
quality, for it will not stay hidden. 

In the news weeklies that are so popular on 
the screen I can, in a group of men or women, 



88 SCREEN ACTING 

almost instantly pick those persons who have 
screen personality. It makes them stand out 
sharply in contrast to their companions. Ex- 
President Wilson, for instance, has screen per- 
sonality while President Harding, I am cer- 
tain, will make a better President than he 
would an actor. 

The movement of the body contributes to 
this sought after animation. The body is al- 
most the equal of the face in expression and 
the way to talk and use the hands and feet are 
things that must be sedulously studied. 

Many stage directors have advised famous 
actresses to "learn how to walk" and before a 
camera one not only has to learn how to walk 
but how to walk in many different ways. 

We would not, for example, expect a little 
girl on New York's East Side to employ the 
same body carriage as a society girl walking 
down Fifth avenue. There seem to be so many 
schools of walking! 

Thus in going over a part it is of the utmost 
importance that we decide upon the way our 
heroine is going to carry herself and then 
throw our body, as well as our thoughts and 
expression, into our role. I have often used 
this matter of walking I was about to say art 
of walking to very good effect. I should ad- 
vise the beginner to observe the many different 



SCREEN ACTING 89 

ways in which various persons accomplish ex- 
pression through the movement of the body. 

It was in the early days. It was in Yonkers. 
We were making "The Escape." It was a 
street scene and we were working with a con- 
cealed camera. Mr. Donald Crisp was playing 
the brutal husband. He drew back his fist to 
strike me. I was the forlorn wife. 

"If yu' touch that lady I'll knock yer block 
off," said a threatening voice. 

It was a young Yonkers bravo. Absorbed 
in the scene he had forgotten that it was acting, 
particularly with the camera concealed. 

I often think of that incident when at a pic- 
ture play I hear someone say: "People don't 
act like that in real life." 



90 SCREEN ACTING 



If I were a director there is nothing I should 
rank as more important than rehearsals. I do 
not mean merely running over the scene before 
it is filmed. All directors do that. The ideal 
rehearsal is one which calls together the lead- 
ing parts perhaps a week before production 
and meticulously works out every vital scene 
in the story. 

No director of the spoken stage would 
think of producing a play without doing this. 
Yet in motion pictures a production that may 
cost twenty times as much as the average 
spoken drama is often put on with twenty 
times less of care in rehearsal. It is illogical 
and costly. 

Working with the director of the type who 
leaves everything until the last minute the 
actor or actress feels a strain that takes away 
from the performance rendered. On the other 
hand where painstaking rehearsal is practiced 
the actor acquires a poise and deftness of 
touch that justify the preliminary prepara- 
tion, say nothing of the labor spared in editing. 



CHAPTER IX 

Long shots, intermediates and close-ups "Hogging 

the camera" and ingenious leading men 

Keeping one's poise under fire. 

WHILE THE actress will exert herself in 
every "shot" or "take" as the separate ex- 
posures of a scene are called she comes to 
know that the result of her acting upon the 
screen is greatly influenced by the distance 
from the camera that she has worked. 

There are, for our present purposes, three 
different distances which we work from the 
camera. There is the long shot, the interme- 
diate and the close-up or insert. With the gra- 
dations of these we need not now concern our- 
selves. 

The long shot is usually taken to establish 
the atmosphere and setting of a scene. In this 
the actress finds herself ordinarily so far from 
the camera that her facial expression registers 
indifferently. For that reason the body move- 
ment, with which she is playing a character, 
substitutes for facial expression. She is known 

91 



92 SCREEN ACTING 

to the audience by her costume and carriage 
and makes her appeal largely through these. 

Most of the dramatic action is now played 
at three-quarters length ; that is from the face 
to the knees. As we weave in and out of a 
scene, very often the entire body is shown and 
the feet have their opportunity for expression 
they assuredly act ! but the majority of the 
intermediate shots through which the dramatic 
action is conducted cut off the lower part of 
the body. 

Here, in brief, is the combination of facial 
expression and bodily movement that estab- 
lishes the actress. It will be through the inter- 
mediate shots that my candidate will make or 
break. All our preparation for a part and our 
fitness for it are here brought to the test. 

An important item in this phase of screen 
acting is the effect that those playing opposite 
will exert upon one. The good actor or actress 
helps one. Things seem to swim along. Work 
becomes a pleasure! 

But very often the actress will find that she 
is forced to work opposite other actresses or 
actors whose style is disagreeable. If they are 
too loud or too full of antics it has the effect 
of taking your mind off your work if you let 
it! In such a case very often the director 
will observe the difficulty and a word of cau- 
tion spoken in private to the offending actor or 
actress will improve conditions. 



SCREEN ACTING 93 

But sometimes the director is not observing 
and you are forced to make the best of condi- 
tions. I recall one rather well-known actor 
who, to use a frank expression, "spits as he 
talks." If I should ever be compelled to play 
opposite him again I should prepare myself 
either with an umbrella or a bathing suit. I 
think it was only his total unconsciousness of 
this habit that made it possible for me to con- 
tinue. 

We women are told that we are very vain. 
Perhaps we are. But if my experience with 
male actors may be taken as a criterion I should 
say that vanity has been pretty well distributed 
throughout the world. 

With a few notable exceptions, I make bold 
to affirm that the leading man counts that day 
lost when he has not stolen the camera from 
the star (poor girl!) not once but several times. 
In the profession we call this "hogging the 
camera." 

The tricks that some of these amiable gen- 
tlemen will play to keep themselves in the im- 
mediate center of the foreground deserve 
nothing less than a volume. This leads to many 
amusing experiences. 

I remember one leading man who had a habit 
of falling back from the camera during the 
progress of a scene. The result of this, of 
course, was to turn me toward him, leaving 
my back exposed to the camera. He was very 



94 SCREEN ACTING 

ingenuous. I thought, at first, the habit was 
unintentional. 

But as work upon our play progressed he 
repeated this maneuver often enough to con- 
vince me that I was dealing with a rather 
clever artist in his way. I began to anticipate 
him. When he started to drop away from the 
camera, instead of turning toward him, as I 
had previously done, I stood still and practiced 
talking over my shoulder. 

This had the value, at least, of showing my 
face and not my back to the audience. In addi- 
tion it gave me an unequal prominence in the 
picture, since he was standing three or four 
feet behind me. Realizing his disadvantage he 
quickly resumed a position beside me and 
thereafter abandoned his little trick. 

Since that time, however, I have seen him 
in other plays and he is quite as original as 
ever. 

I might go on indefinitely with such in- 
stances. Enough that the artist must be on 
her guard for it seems to be acting-nature to 
want to "hog the camera." But as the stars 
and directors are aware of this tendency its 
accomplishment has become more difficult. 

It is particularly trying, too, to play opposite 
one of your own sex who insists upon over- 
acting. This is a common case. This kind of 
actress generally realizes that she has but a 
few important moments before the camera and 
is determined to make the best of them even if 




Q 

tt: 



"2 
5 



SCREEN ACTING 97 

she has to "act the star off the set." I have 
actually felt sometimes as though I were being 
pushed from the stage by some actress, who, 
without any particular reason, has come in like 
a whirlwind. 

The beginner will find himself best off if he 
does not let the style of those playing opposite 
him affect him too much. If the style is good 
take advantage of it. It will be real help. If 
it is bad one should the more concentrate upon 
his part and thus maintain his own poise under 
diffculties. 

If in these important intermediate shots 
where the most of the dramatic action is sus- 
tained we remember the various points that we 
have discussed we should come off acceptably. 

The silent drama is silent only in its com- 
pleted product. Before the camera lines are 
spoken and it is of utmost importance that 
they be pronounced clearly and with feeling. 

In spoken sub-titles that are expressively 
mouthed and well-timed in the cutting, the sub- 
title seems to blend in with the voice though 
it be unheard of the speaker, particularly so 
to the spectator who is clever at lip-reading. 

While it is not necessary to memorize a great 
number of lines, as on the spoken stage, it is 
necessary that those lines which are read be 
given with the correct shade of feeling, just as 
they should be on the dramatic stage. 

Lines are particularly important to many 
persons who show a maximum of expression 



98 SCREEN ACTING 

while speaking. Here the silent voice is a gen- 
uine asset. 

Most close-ups, or inserts, as we call them, 
are of the face alone. Sometimes there may 
be a close-up of a hand, a foot, etc., but the 
most acceptable style of direction these days 
seems to be not to overdo in this respect. 

In the close-up the face of the actress is 
usually about 24 inches from the camera. 
Every line of her face, every thought, indeed, 
her very soul, will now be more or less regis- 
tered. Nothing, in the whole range of screen 
acting, is more effective than the close-up. 

The insert is always to depict a particular 
emotion. In a single scene, in the intermediate 
shots, we have perhaps expressed several de- 
grees of feeling but in the insert it is a matter 
of one emotion at a time. 

Here we are not aided by the action or ex- 
pression of any brother artist. It is entirely 
a matter of imagination or feeling. The lens 
of the camera, like the eye of a Cyclops, is 
staring sheerly at us and it is not necessary to 
feel its breath to believe that it is a living thing. 

When called upon for an insert we know 
precisely the emotion that we are supposed to 
express and will bend every effort to concen- 
trate upon it. 

To begin with there are two important 
things to remember in the insert. One is that 
the make up should be very much lighter than 



SCREEN ACTING 99 

in the long or intermediate shots; the other, 
that the action will be slower. 

The reasons are fairly obvious. If the same 
make up that is used in the dramatic action is 
continued it becomes immediately too con- 
spicuous. Slower action is necessary because 
at the distance of two feet the camera is lim- 
ited in the speed of movement that it can faith- 
fully record. 

In the insert we are ever reminded of the 
value of repression. The mere expression of 
the eyes may be all that is necessary to convey 
to the audience the emotion of the player. The 
truth is that the effectiveness of the close-up 
seems to be in inverse proportion to the amount 
of facial action in it. 

When we behold an insert in which there is 
much grimacing and contortion of the face we 
realize that there is no real depth of feeling. 
It is playing at feeling. 

On the other hand I have seen vital emotion 
so delicately expressed in the insert that its 
effect was haunting and beautiful. Observe 
in "Broken Blossoms" and "Way Down East" 
the close-ups of Lillian Gish. 

Much as the good old "back spot" is popular 
among the fluffy bonds, so is the insert wel- 
comed by all screen actresses. We believe that 
it shows us off at our best and brings us nearer, 
as it were, to our audiences. 

Yet there are some actresses favored over 
others by the insert. One whose features are 



100 SCREEN ACTING 

naturally coarse, or hard, loses something 
when in close contact with the camera. Others, 
like myself, who have small features, and be- 
lieve, therefore, that we are often at a disad- 
vantage in the long and intermediate shots, are 
only too glad of the opportunity to prepare for 
an insert. 

Indeed, our directors sometimes make a jest 
of saying that we seem to want a drama of 
inserts. But it is never quite so bad as that. 



CHAPTER X 

Atmosphere and studio morale Where best work is 

done Importance of story Value of 

'Observation Tours." 

THE BEGINNER has learned that he or she 
must at all times stand solidly before the cam- 
era upon his or her own feet. I mean this in 
a metaphorical sense. So much depends upon 
courage and self-reliance. 

If it is well not to let the style of supporting 
artists affect one, it is equally well to steel one's 
self against the conditions under which one 
must sometimes work. 

The motion picture, after all, is a commercial 
proposition. It is very much so to the pro- 
ducer. For that reason the beginner will find 
that different studios create and maintain their 
own atmosphere. Here one will discover a 
wide range. But since we may consider our- 
selves called upon to work now in New York, 
again in California, and sometimes in Florida, 
passing from studio to studio, we shall win a 
big battle if at the outset we will determine to 

101 



102 SCREEN ACTING 

let conditions and studio atmosphere affect us 
as little as possible. 

It is here, again, a case of taking advantage 
of conditions if they are good, and trying to 
ignore them if they are distasteful. 

I know from experience that this will be a 
hard thing to do. If the actress finds, in the 
very air of which she breathes, unpleasantness 
and intrigue, she will be normally inclined to 
resent it hotly. Yet such resentment only 
takes away from her acting, for it diverts her 
mind, and she will be the greater loser as be- 
tween herself and her producer. 

I have worked under such profound systems 
as considered studio spies and time charts upon 
make up, etc., as necessary to production. I 
will leave it to the reader to decide how much 
morale one will find in this sort of studio. 

Fortunately such a studio and such a morale 
are the exception. But, if encountered in the 
many vicissitudes that an actress will face, it 
will be well to make the best of it ; to steel one's 
nervous system against odds. Self-reliance in 
such a case is no less than golden. 

But in the majority of studios the manufac- 
ture of motion pictures is not put upon the 
same level as the making of gloves or brooms, 
and the beginner will find a kindly and friendly 
atmosphere both charming and helpful. 

In those studios that glow with a warm, 
friendly atmosphere there is always a good- 
natured rivalry and spirit of fellowship which 



SCREEN ACTING 103 

is certain to reflect itself in the finished pic- 
ture. For that reason it is a genuine asset. 
Here hours are buoyant minutes and the actors 
and directors find their reward in the excel- 
lence of their endeavor, as well as somewhere 
in Heaven. 

Another point that the beginner must re- 
member is that it is much harder to make good 
in pictures now than it was when I started. 
That, of course, is because of the greater com- 
petition. 

Where ten years ago there was one boy or 
girl ambitious for a screen career there are 
now a thousand. I often think that the screen 
has been very kind to those who had faith in 
it in its babyhood. It has brought to so many 
of these fame and fortune. 

And sometimes, when I observe some fairly 
competent actress or actor thwarted in an at- 
tempt to reach stardom, I wonder if the screen, 
after its own fashion, is not asserting itself for 
this lack of faith in those early days. 

At any rate those who got in first secured a 
big advantage over those who wondered if a 
multiple-reel picture could be a success and 
doubted it for, as some said, "It would be too 
great a strain upon the eye." 

But if there are more aspirants now there 
are assuredly more opportunities and my can- 
didate need have no fear. Sooner or later 
merit may be counted upon to assert itself. All 



104 _ SCREEN ACTING 

about us in motion pictures we every day per- 
ceive the truth of this. 

It is also true that the screen is in a state of 
constant change. The methods of acting 
change ; the methods of direction ; the methods 
of presentation ; the methods of story selection 
all is continually in flux. 

No one knows what another five years will 
bring. But we do know that some of our 
prized pictures of five or more years ago would 
be instantly pointed out as old-fashioned by 
the average theater-goer. That is because 
there is no fundamental point about them that 
has not been somehow affected by time. 

Yet no pictures I ever will make will be 
dearer to me than my "The Sands of Dee," 
"Apple Pie Mary," "The Little Liar," "The 
Escape," "Hoodoo Ann," "The Wharf Rat," 
etc. 

This constant evolution is a matter to be 
reckoned with. To stand still is to be lost. We 
must always be pushing ahead. For that reason 
the beginner and the star will find it greatly to 
their advantage to follow everything that is 
done on the screen. 

In unexpected places we discover new devel- 
opment. Some unheard-of player in a boister- 
ous two-reel comedy may disclose some little 
trick, or expression, or bit of business, that 
can be easily interpolated in the more serious 
drama with good effect. And so on. 




A pair excellent in its screenic balance Gloria Swanson 
and Thomas Meighan. 



SCREEN ACTING 107 

We must read widely. Try as they may, 
we can be mortally certain that no scenario 
editors can always supply the vehicle which we 
feel is suitable for us to play. There will come 
a time when the actress will be thrown upon 
her own resources, either in the matter of re- 
jection or selection of a story. She must be 
able to put her finger on what she considers a 
vital defect in some narrative that appeals to 
the editor, or discover for him good points in 
some other story against which he is preju- 
diced. 

In any event it will be extremely hazardous 
not to participate as much as possible in the 
business of deciding upon the play. 

Nothing is so vital as a good story. Even 
when poorly acted it will be of greater appeal 
than a well played scenario of no merit. Mo- 
tion picture actresses prosper almost in exact 
ratio to the inherent worth of their scenarios. 

At first this story matter will not greatly 
concern the tyro. But as the beginner finds 
himself or herself slowly crawling up the lad- 
der to stardom he or she will do well to think 
often upon the type of story to be preferred if 
given a chance to star. 

By this process the beginner will be visual- 
izing himself in a role. Of a certain his most 
pleasant visualization will be the role in which 
he feels that he would be at his best. In such 
a way, when the chance comes, the star may 



108 SCREEN ACTING 

know exactly the story he or she will fit per- 
fectly. 

Once the story is decided upon there are 
many ways to bring to it genuine color. In 
several of my early plays Mr. Griffith sent me 
down into the New York slums on an "observa- 
tion tour." We all made such tours. In "In- 
tolerance" I visited sick and stricken mothers 
in baby hospitals. We spent a half-day once 
in a jail observing the characters therein. 

It is always important in acting to show a 
thing as it is, not as we think it ought to be, 
and for that reason these "observation tours" 
are of great benefit. 



CHAPTER XI 

Mr. Griffith and some of his methods of direction 

What everyone associated with the screen 

owes to him About patience. 



I HAVE planned all along to dedicate this 
chapter to Mr. David Wark Griffith, and now 
that I have arrived at it, I find that my pen is 
unequal to the task. No mere chapter, nor 
book, could undertake to tell Mr. Griffith's im- 
portance to motion pictures. The things that 
he has accomplished in the past ten years, in- 
variably in the face of great odds, almost pass 
belief. 

For Mr. Griffith I have the strong and mixed 
feeling that the child has for its benefactor, or 
the student for a beloved preceptor. At an 
age now where I can more appreciate the many 
trials that he endured I look back fondly to 
those days when Mary Pickford, Blanche 
Sweet, Lillian and Dorothy Gish, Robert Har- 
ron, and myself were beginning our careers 
and at the same time founding what has come 
to be known as the Griffith school. 

109 



110 SCREEN ACTING 

Nor were we all. If the list of actresses, 
actors and directors who spent the formulative 
days of their screen careers with Mr. Griffith 
were compiled I believe it would be found to 
include many of those who have reached the 
heights. Mr. George Loane Tucker, Mr. 
Thomas Ince, Mr. Marshall Neilan and Mr. 
Raoul Walsh, to name but four, were directors 
that he started on the road to success. 

Those were the days of the old Biograph. I 
am sure they were of the happiest that any of 
us ever have spent. We made two-reelers then. 
But we made good two-reelers. And the guid- 
ing genius of the organization was Mr. Griffith, 
tireless in his quest for something new, some- 
thing big, something that would expand and 
elevate this new art to which he had pledged 
his very soul. 

His energy in those days, just as it is now, 
was astounding. Traveling from New York 
to Los Angeles not long ago, I happened to 
meet aboard the train Mr. Griffith's private 
secretary. 

"He seems never so unhappy," she said, "as 
when he is taking a day off. He mopes around 
the studio, hands in his pockets, with an air 
almost comical. It is as though he were 
silently resenting such foolishness as days off." 

With this energy I remember those early 
days best for Mr. Griffith's infinite patience. 
I can truly say that he had the patience to make 
us succeed. He never despaired no matter how 



SCREEN ACTING 111 

backward we might be. He kept at us con- 
stantly to bring out the best that was in us. 
And even on those extraordinary occasions 
when he seemed to lose patience usually when 
we had worn his nerves to a frazzle we al- 
ways had that wonderful feeling that he was 
intensely loyal to all of us. 

Those were the days when in addition to 
schooling us to pictures Mr. Griffith was con- 
stantly experimenting with such things as 
close-ups, fade-outs, etc., that were to revolu- 
tionize the entire picture drama and lift it 
above the atmosphere of the nickelodeon. 

For he did lift it. And he is still lifting it. 

Not only those privileged few of us who con- 
sider ourselves of the Griffith school are in- 
debted to his genius. Every actress, or actor, 
or director, on the screen today, who has a 
weekly salary that runs into three figures, can 
thank Mr. Griffith for making motion pictures 
big and prosperous enough to so recompense 
them. 

It is not the money that Mr. Griffith has 
made possible, but the dignity that he put into 
this new art for which we are most beholden 
to him. Motion pictures were lightly held until 
"The Birth of a Nation" shook an entire con- 
tinent and showed the deep significance and 
possibilities of the screen art. 

It took the courage of the born fighter and 
worlds of confidence to put on such a picture as 
"The Birth of a Nation." For here at one step 



112 SCREEN ACTING 

he was doing the unheard of thing, the thing 
almost everyone in the profession said was im- 
possible. But it wasn't impossible to Mr. 
Griffith. He did it. 

He has continued to do things just as fine. 
And if there is one fault to which the most of 
us are addicted it is that we have come to ex- 
pect more than is humanly possible of this 
patient, humble genius. 

In my correspondence I am often asked 
many questions regarding Mr. Griffith's man- 
ner of directing. Wherein is it different from 
other directors ? Wherein does it excel ? How 
is it possible to become associated with him? 
Can he make anyone a star? And so on. 

These questions are, in a way, difficult to 
answer. So far as I know Mr. Griffith pos- 
sesses no magic lamp by which he makes a star 
out of anyone. It is not any one quality 
unless it be patience but a combination of 
many that make him the foremost of our 
directors. 

Mr. Griffith is extremely human. There is 
no unnecessary flourish, or blowing of trum- 
pets, about his manner of direction. That has 
the simplicity of true greatness. He never 
lords it over his players as I have seen some 
directors do. He is kindly, sympathetic and 
understanding. 

Perhaps we are about to do a very vital 
scene. Mr. Griffith tilts back in his chair he 




Mr. Griffith, at the left, directing a scene in 
"Intolerance." 



SCREEN ACTING 115 

has a manner of directing while seated and 
may say to the actress : 

"You understand this situation. Now let us 
see what you would do with it." 

Here is a direct challenge. The actress is 
put upon her metal. After giving the matter 
careful consideration she plays the scene after 
her own idea. If she does it well no one is 
quicker in his praise than Mr. Griffith. If 
otherwise, no one is more kindly in pointing 
out the flaws. 

In other words, Mr. Griffith gives the actress 
a chance. How different from other directors 
I have seen. They might say under the same 
circumstances : 

"You understand this situation. Now here 
is the way to do it. Follow me closelly." 

With that the director will proceed to act 
out a scene according to his notion of how a 
woman would conduct herself under given cir- 
cumstances. The flaw in this is obviously that 
a man and woman have a way of acting differ- 
ently in the same situation and Mr. Griffith, by 
letting the actress show what she would do, is 
shrewd enough to profit by Nature. Our self- 
sufficient director, on the other hand, wants us 
to act only as a man would think a woman 
ought to act in a given situation. 

In this way Mr. Griffith draws out the best 
that is in his players, and, by seeming to de- 
pend upon them to stand upon their own feet, 
maintains an enthusiasm among his players 



116 SCREEN ACTING 

a sort of big family spirit that I never have 
seen equalled in any other studio. 

I hope no one understands me to say that the 
actress, under Mr. Griffith, has the say of how 
she shall act. Quite the contrary ! No one has 
a way of bringing a player more abruptly to 
his or her senses when he or she is unquali- 
fiedly in the wrong. 

And no matter how well we think we have 
outlined a scene Mr. Griffith may entirely 
change it. When he does change it we know 
it is for a reason other than a fondness for 
showing authority. In other words, he has 
built up among his artists a great and abiding 
faith in his ability to do the right thing at the 
right time, or, as importantly, have it done. 

For another thing, Mr. Griffith is big enough 
not to be small about receiving suggestions. 
His people know that, with the result that they 
are always thinking up something to put into 
a scene that has not been written there. He 
listens attentively to these suggestions, even 
though he knows in advance that he probably 
cannot use one in a hundred of them. Yet that 
one may be important enough to balance the 
patience expended in listening to the other 
ninety-nine. 

To illustrate: 

In "The Birth of a Nation," when the Cam- 
eron house was being mobbed by frenzied 
negroes and the family had barricaded itself 
in the cellar it was a matter of some moment 



SCREEN ACTING 117 

how the little sister, which part I was for- 
tunate enough to play, would be affected. 

I can hear your average director : 

"Roll your eyes," he would say. "Cry! Drop 
to your knees in terror." 

In other words, it would be the same old 
stuff. It is this same old stuff that makes so 
many pictures positively deadly. The least 
that can be said about this conventional style 
of doing things is that, if it cannot be criticized, 
neither can it be applauded. 

Mr. Griffith, when we came to the cellar 
scene, asked me if there had ever been a time 
in my life when I had been filled with terror. 

"Yes," I said. 

"What did you do?" he inquired. 

"I laughed," I answered. 

He saw the point immediately. 

"Good," he said. "Let's try it." 

It was the hysterical laugh of the little girl 
in the cellar, with the drunken mob raging 
above, that was, I am sure, far more effective 
than rolling the eyes or weeping would have 
been. 

Mr. Griffith is quick to appreciate the invol- 
untary action of one of his actresses while a 
scene is being played or rehearsed. As for 
instance, in the court room scene in "Intoler- 
ance" ("The Mother and the Law") when I 
began unconsciously to wring my handkerchief 
and press it to my face. 

"Good," he said, "keep it up!" 



118 SCREEN ACTING 

We are gratified when Mr. Griffith accepts 
any suggestion for business, etc., for we know 
he has a fine sense of distinction and, for every 
idea we give him, he returns a hundred. 

This system of suggestion extends beyond 
the players to the mechanical department with 
the result that camera men and assistants, as 
well as assistant directors, are always on the 
alert for something new. They know their 
suggestion will be given due consideration. 
And for that reason to Mr. Griffith and his 
staff we owe credit for most of the new inven- 
tions of telling a story by pictures. This di- 
rector is as expert in the mechanics of his art 
as he is bold in story conception. 

We are familiar with that smoky, hazy, 
beautiful close-up that Mr. "Billy" Bitzer in- 
vented by using gauze or placing the camera 
slightly out of focus. In some recent pictures 
bearing the "D. G." stamp I have seen some 
beautiful blue values that I have not elsewhere 
observed. 

I find the space allotted to this chapter begin- 
ning to dwindle with a sense of having left 
unsaid so many important and interesting 
things about this wonderful director and his 
methods. But someday someone will set down 
the true estimate of the man who has done so 
much for the picture drama. And Time will 
write it even larger. 

Many of us are deeply indebted to Mr. 
Griffith and none of us owe that which can be 



SCREEN ACTING 119 

repaid. For he gave us of his genius and per- 
sonality and for these there is no return coin. 
Other directors I have had of many experi- 
ences and varied training. Sometimes we have 
succeeded and sometimes we have failed, and 
success is made only the more sweet by taste of 
failure. But whether we failed or succeeded 
we know, all of us, that we did our level best. 
That is something. 



In the matter of public acknowledgement 
the stage has never been so kind to its directors 
as the screen. We think of Belasco, Hopkins, 
Cohan, not forgetting Mr. Oliver Morosco, 
and are almost done. 

But on the screen, to name a few of many, 
there are the De Milles, with their uncanniness 
in seeming to make the screen talk; Tucker, 
with his painstaking thoroughness and ability 
to limn the separate values of a story ; Neilan, 
with his quality of gay, unexpectedness ; Tour- 
neur, with his grand manner of picturization ; 
Dwan, with his workman-like comprehension; 
Fitzmaurice, with his ability to make every 
scene beautiful as a painting; Walsh, with his 
all-around cleverness all these are famous, 
and there are more. 

No medium has equalled the screen in its 
kindness to those who do creditable work. 
Witness, for instance, our camera aristocracy. 



While I have ridden faster than seventy 



120 SCREEN ACTING 

miles an hour in an automobile, have been 
"ducked" in lakes, rivers, and oceans two of 
them have braved the wintry blasts of New 
England until I thought I was frozen, and 
done scenes with tigers, bears and lions, I have 
never feared greatly for my personal safety 
nor need the beginner. 

In really dangerous scenes "doubles" acro- 
bats, trick jumpers, bareback riders, animal 
trainers, etc. dress in feminine garb to re- 
semble the star, assume the role being played 
and risk death or danger for so many dollars 
a day. The star's services are too valuable to 
the producer for him to allow her to take any 
unnecessary chances. 



CHAPTER XII 

Opportunity for home life of motion picture actress 

Los Angeles and New York as production 

centers Screen morals and such. 

IN THIS final chapter I shall try to say some- 
thing about the home life of the motion picture 
actress. In general actresses are of two 
classes: those who act both on and off the 
screen, and those who confine their efforts 
merely to the studio. 

The first class is not particularly open to 
censure. For, unless I am mistaken, the public 
desires to see its actresses act on an average of 
sixteen out of twenty-four hours. One friend 
of mine, a star, stoutly maintains that she 
would not go to the theater in anything except 
the most up-to-date garb and a conspicuous 
car! Why? Because otherwise there would 
be sure to be many who would be disappointed 
in her! If there is anything funny about this 
it is that it is somewhat true. 

Actresses, as public favorites, maintain a 
peculiar position, as Gil Bias points out, some- 
where between royalty and the citizen without 

121 



122 SCREEN ACTING 

being of either. The public seems to feel some- 
thing of pride when it points out some glitter- 
ing dreadnaught of an automobile, conspicuous 
for color or equipment, and says, "There goes 
Dolly Twinkletoes!" 

Personally I have never had this inclination 
to act both "off and on." I am afraid, having 
been of a large family, I should have found it 
extremely difficult even had I the inclination. 
A number of sisters, and a brother or two, are 
a fine cure for any tendency to undue im- 
portance. 

And now that I have an especially charm- 
ing daughter, and am happily married, I must 
really be set down as a conservative. That 
baby of mine! Being detained beyond hours 
at the studio one night I hurried home to see 
her before she was tucked in bed, having no 
time to take off my make up. She gazed at 
me as though she were beholding a ghost or a 
total stranger! 

A Chicago picture critic once gave me such 
advice as I think fit to pass on to those who 
think of the screen as a career. "Save the pen- 
nies," she said, "they can always be spent if 
you have them." 

Yet how many, with a splendid opportunity, 
do not save ! Then some day they wake up and 
find their golden chance gone. As an old 
philosopher has pointed out, we, who find 
money so easy at times, must guard against in- 
temperance and folly. 



SCREEN ACTING 123 

But this is not a sermon. We live up in the 
beautiful California mountains. There, in a 
colonial house on a small acreage, with flower 
and vegetable gardens, Airedales, chickens, a 
car, a cow, and a cat, I have a feeling of sub- 
stantial worth-while happiness and that is the 
kind that counts. 

Indeed, one of the best things about motion 
pictures is that it permits of a home life. The 
actress in vaudeville or on tour, or even on 
Broadway with the uncertainty of the length 
of runs, never has any surety where she will 
be on the morrow. We, in motion pictures, 
are fortunate enough to sign contracts that 
usually call for a year or more work in one city 
and that New York or Los Angeles. This, I 
should say, is one of the most advantageous 
things about the screen as contrasted with the 
spoken drama. There are many others. 

Since Los Angeles and New York are the 
two centers of the motion picture industry each 
has its staunch advocates as to suitability, etc. 
In any group of actresses and actors this will 
usually be the topic of a lively discussion. Per- 
sonally I like Los Angeles. At a dinner that I 
attended some time ago the head of a big dis- 
tributing company, who is interesting for his 
shrewd observations, said there had never been 
a really great picture done in New York City. 
"For the entire atmosphere of life there," he 
continued, "is too superficial." 

I agree with him. Los Angeles is friendly 



124 SCREEN ACTING 

and natural. Its climate is only one of its 
many virtues. 

The screen actress will be called upon to 
meet the people of the press. Interviews are 
important. She will find that the number of 
them will usually be determined by the degree 
of success of her newest screen play. As for 
screen writers, one will discover them, in the 
majority, keen, sympathetic and altogether de- 
lightful. No one need have the dread of com- 
ing in contact with them that I originally had ; 
nor resort to the subterfuges to evade them. 
I was very young then. 

Public appearance is another factor the 
screen has to deal with and sometimes I think 
this is rather overdone. During the separate 
campaigns for the sale of Liberty Bonds all of 
us tried to do our share. While I never hope 
to be able to make a speech, I find that the 
anticipation of being expected to do so fills me 
with greater terror than actually being called 
upon. 

I believe it is a good idea for the actress to 
cultivate some companion art. In between 
productions, or during an enforced vacation, 
she will have something then as an ofT-set to 
mere indolence. I have been interested in 
sculpture for many years, and I have an ambi- 
tion to do something in it that will be of real 
value. If I don't, the ambition will have been 
of real value, for it has assisted in providing 




I 



J 

* 

5: 



SCREEN ACTING 127 

me with many happy and instructive hours. 
That is the main thing. 

The study of another art is interesting, too, 
because we immediately perceive in its form 
and substance the truth of the saying that all 
arts are one. Sculpture is a matter of repres- 
sion and emphasis just as acting is. And when 
I am doing the figure of my baby, or modeling 
from life, I am startled to find that my errors, 
in their way, are akin to the errors of the be- 
ginning actress. 

There may have existed at one time a silly 
idea that actresses shouldn't marry; that it 
hurt their box-office value, destroyed an illu- 
sion, etc. As though actresses were not 
women ! Most of my actress friends are mar- 
ried and glad of it. Almost without exception 
those who have gone highest in the profession 
are married. The public has invariably been 
pleased about it. 

I should recommend any young actress to a 
suitable husband. It will give her a better and 
deeper insight into life and broaden her sym- 
pathy. There is something a little pitiable, 
something that doesn't ring quite true, about 
the actress too ready to boast of her star- 
spangled freedom. 

I have often been asked about the morals of 
motion pictures. Will someone tell me why 
we, all of us, are so deeply concerned with our 
neighbor's morals? And when we find them 
not all that could be desired are we filled with 



128 SCREEN ACTING 

sorrow and the wish to effect an honest reform, 
or with a sort of unholy joy and a desire to 
spread scandal? 

It has been my observation that in motion 
pictures a girl can be as good as she wants to 
be. In that way our profession is identical 
with others. It is true that the glamour of the 
screen has attracted people who would be unde- 
sirable in any business or profession. But we 
should recognize them as such and never mis- 
take them as representing the entire profes- 
sion. 

The majority of those who succeed in motion 
pictures do so by honest work. That means 
long hours and application. I doubt if the av- 
erage successful business man puts in as much 
time or as high-tension effort as the picture 
actress, actor or director who gets somewhere. 
My friends are of that kind. They are too 
busy to worry unnecessarily over what the pub- 
lic may think of motion picture morals. They 
assume only to regulate their own conduct. 

I have enjoyed doing this book. From time 
to time I have been forced to drop my work 
upon the urgent appeal of my eighteen-months' 
old daughter. She has gorgeous blue eyes with 
lashes long as twilight shadows. Her cheeks 
are exquisitely pink and her little mouth is like 
a rose-bud in spring. Her name is Mary. She 
has brought me worlds of undreamed of hap- 
piness. 



SCREEN ACTING 129 

Someday Mary may want to go upon the 
screen. Even now she acts before the long 
mirror. If she can, in any way, secure her 
mother's hat she gives a complete performance. 
My blessed baby! 

When the time has arrived for her to start 
upon her career I shall place my little book in 
her hands and say : 

"There is the most and the best that I knew 
about the screen back in those old-fashioned 
days of 1921." 



University of California 

SOUTHERN REGIONAL LIBRARY FACILITY 

405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90024-1388 

Return this material to the library 

from which it was borrowed.