m
WORKS OF PROF. H. N. OGDEN
PUBLISHED BY
JOHN WILEY & SONS
Sewer Construction.
8vo. xii + 335 pages, 192 figures. Cloth, $3.00.
Sewer Design.
12mo, xi + 234 pages, 54 figures, 5 platen. Cloth.
82.00.
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
BY
HENRY N. OGDEN, C.E.
ASSOC. MEM. AM. SO<
PROFESSOR OF SANITARY ENGINEERING, CORNELL UNIVERSITY
SPECIAL ASST. ENGINEER, N. Y. STA 1 I !
OF HEALTH
FfRST EDITION
FIRST THOUSAND
NEW YORK
JOHN WILEY & SONS
LONDON: CHAPMAN & HALL, LIMITED
1908
COPYRIGHT, 1908,
BY
HENRY N. OGDEN
Stanbope ipreea
F. H. GILSON COMPANY-
BOSTON. U.S.A.
PREFACE
THE following pages comprise, in a somewhat amplified form,
a course of lectures given in the College of Civil Kn^iiu-rring,
Cornell University.
The course is an elective one, intended for students whose- pur-
pose to enter the field of Sanitary Engineering calls for more special
and detailed work than is required of all civil engineering student-.
The illustrations of the classroom, made possible by a a
of lantern slides, a portion of which only have been repnxliu •< •«!,
are accompanied by abundant explanation brought out by qi;
tions and answers — a feature not possible to repeat in this present
volume. It is hoped, however, that sufficient detail has bt •« n
given to make clear the examples of current practice which
offered.
The course represents the second part of a year's work, of which
the book on " Sewer Design," already published, is the first part,
and it is assumed that the reader is familiar with that volume.
Wherever serious omissions from the present text have been made
on that account, references have been given so that duplication
may be avoided.
It is believed that due acknowledgment has been made to the
various books and periodicals and to the reports of the promi-
nent engineers and city officials from which this monograph has
been prepared, and it is hoped that the collection and unification
of this scattered material may not only aid the students entering
upon the investigation of sewer construction, but may also be of
some service to practicing engineers who may have occasion to
take up the matter of sewer work for the first time.
A small number of the illustrations have no references cited,
due to the fact that they were filed among the author's notes at
iv PREFACE
various times without mention of the source, and an extended
search has not been able to locate them. They have nevertheless
been included because they have proved useful in classroom
work.
Special acknowledgment is made to the volumes of Engineer-
ing News, Engineering Record, and Municipal Engineering, from
which examples of construction have been freely taken, the figures
however, having all been redrawn. Examples of costs have bivn
taken from current volumes of Engineering-Contracting, where
most valuable data on the cost of engineering work is to be found.
Thanks are due to the Eureka Machine Company of Jackson,
Mich., to the C. W. Raymond Company of Dayton, Ohio, to the
Turner, Vaughn, and Taylor Company of Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio,
and to the Carson Trench Machine Company of Boston, Mass.,
for the loan of cuts from which figures i, 2, 3, 190, and 192 have
been made. The cut of the Moore Machine was made from a
photograph kindly furnished by Mr. Thos. F. Moore, president
of the Moore Machine Company.
The comments on the clauses of the specifications and contract
in the chapter of that title are based on the exposition of parallel
phrases as set forth in Wait's " Engineering Jurisprudence," and
due acknowledgment is hereby made to the author of that valuable
treatise. This chapter has been submitted to Professor E. H.
Woodruff of the College of Law, Cornell University, and to Alec
H. Seymour, Esq., legal adviser to the New York State Department
of Health, to whom the thanks of the author are most cordially
extended.
CONTENTS
CHAPTER I. TERRA-COTTA PIPE.
Man
The manufacture and composition of sewer pipe. Commercial sizes.
Cross-sections. Standard lengths. Thickness of pipe. Double-
strength pipe. Standard and deep-and-wide sockets. Corruga-
tions 1-12
CHAPTER II. TERRA-COTTA PIPE (continued).
Strength of pipe. Early tests. Howe's experiments. Barbour's testa
and formula. Average breaking loads. Records of failures in
tivnches. Cement joints. Substitutes for cements. Other
forms of joints 13^28
CHAPTER III. BRICK SEWERS.
Kinds of brick. Invert blocks and their value. Quantity of brick-
work for different sizes. Proper thickness of sewer walls. Earth
pressures of sewer arch. Sections adopted in Washington, Ottawa,
New Orleans, Denver, Brooklyn and Rochester. Bond in sewer
work. General considerations 29~5l
CHAPTER IV. CONCRETE SEWERS.
Chenoweth and Ransome processes. Cement pipes. Arch blocks of
concrete. Examples of concrete sewers at Chicago, New York,
Victoria, Truro and Swampscott. Sections from Blaw Centering
Co 52-66
CHAPTER V. CONCRETE AND BRICK SEWERS.
The propriety of their use. Examples of construction at Medford,
Altoona, Melbourne and Boston 67-74
CHAPTER VI. REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWERS.
Examples with steel mesh at Mexico City, Providence, Wilmington and
Harrisburg. The Jackson reinforced pipe. Examples with steel
rods at Jersey City, New York, Des Moines, St. Louis, Phila-
delphia, South Bend and Cleveland 75~88
vi CONTENTS
CHAPTER VII. MANHOLES.
PAGES
The location, cross-section and size of manholes. The construction of
foundation and bottom. The proper thickness of manhole walls.
High level laterals and their connection. Frames and covers.
Locks and dirt pans. Lamp holes 89-112
CHAPTER VIII. CATCH-BASINS.
Location and use of catch-basins. Gratings and traps. Examples of
basins at Columbus, Providence, Margate, Michigan City,
Boston, Wilmington, Peoria, Burlington, Philadelphia, Washing-
ton, Louisville, Warsaw, Tarry town. Maintenance of catch-
basins 113—132
CHAPTER IX. SIPHONS.
Examples of direct siphons at Norfolk and Breslau. Bridge crossings.
Inverted siphons. Examples of their use at Roanoke, Newton,
New Orleans, Woonsocket, Springfield, New York, Ithaca, Buenos
Ayres, Los Angeles and Providence. Auxiliary devices. 133-152
CHAPTER X. SCREENS.
The function and location of screens. Proper area of screens.
Examples of screen chambers at Boston, Ithaca, Manchester,
and Providence. Mesh screens, rod screens, and plate screens.
Examples of screens at White Plains, Marlborough, Cranston,
Wayne, Newark, Providence, Pullman, Richmond and Bir-
mingham 153-169
CHAPTER XL STORM-WATER OVERFLOWS AND REGULATORS.
Proper location of storm overflows. Example at Rochester. Leap-
ing weir. Its theory with example of its use at Milwaukee.
Overflow weirs. Examples at Cleveland, Providence and
Rochester. Regulators. Examples at Boston, Worcester,
Harrisburg, Brookline and Woburn 170-184
CHAPTER XII. BELL MOUTHS.
The description of bell mouths and a discussion of their use.
amples at Philadelphia, Boston and Providence. Alternate
construction 185-194
CONTENTS vii
CHAPTER XIII. I OUNDATIO
Plank and gravel footings. Woodm platform^ and cradles. Con-
crete foundation.-. Piling. Examples of pili- foundation
Cambridge, Lynn, Troy, Boston, New York, St. Paul. Allow
ance for settlement at Boston 195-210
CHAPTER XIV. OUTFAI.I. SI-.WKRS.
Outlet through high bank. Example at Niagara Falls. OutK-t
into shallow water. Examples at Harrisburg and Bing-
hamton. Outlet into tidal waters. Examples at Philadrl-
phia, Boston, New York, and New London. ProUvtion from
erosion. Examples at Burlington and Los Angeles 211-226
CHAPTER XV. HOUSE ('<>\\i< noNS.
Y and T branches. Records of location. Size of house drain.
Connections with deep sewers. Two-story lines. In rock
trenches 227-234
CHAPTER XVI. SURVEYING.
Location of sewer line. Location of manholes. Offset line. Grade
boards. Field notes. Estimates. Records of branches 235-244
CHAPTER XVII. TREN< HINT..
Width of trenches. Sheeting. Conveying machines. Carson, Lid-
gerwood and Moore machines. Rock trenching. Drilling and
explosives 245-256
CHAPTER XVIII. ESTIMATES AND COSTS.
Earth excavation, back-filling, ramming. Rock-work. Sluvting.
Tunnel-work. Vitrified pipe. Brickwork. Conm-tr. Man
holes. Iron castings. Flush-tanks. Engineering 257-278
CHAPTER XIX. SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACTS.
Typical form of contract and specifications, with comments thereon, 270-323
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE
1. Pug mill 3
2. Roll mill . . 4
3. Pipe press
4. Pipe die 6
5. Bell and spigot pipe 9
6. Forms of sockets i a
7. Support for jointing pipe 21
8. Device for holding jointed pipe 22
9. Molds for Stanford joint 23
10. Conical Stanford joint section 27
11. Spherical Stanford joint section 27
12. Archer joint 27
13. Hassal joint 27
14. Sykes joint 28
15. Brick section in New York 30
16. Joints in brick sewer 31
17. Invert blocks of American Sewer Pipe Co 32
18. Talbot's invert block 32
19. Latham's invert block 33
20. Babcock's invert block 33
21. Equilibrium polygon in Philadelphia section 38
22. Equilibrium polygon in Philadelphia section 39
23. Equilibrium polygon for different loadings 40
24. Egg-shaped section at Washington, D.C 41
25. Egg-shaped section at Washington, D.C 42
26. 5-foot 9-inch sewer on piles 43
27. 7-foot sewer at Ottawa, Canada 43
28. 6-foot sewer at New Orleans, La 44
29. 94-inch sewer at Denver, Colo 46
30. Egg-shaped sewer at Rochester, N.Y 46
31. Basket-handle section at Rochester, N.Y 47
32. Row-lock bond for brickwork 48
33. Headers for bonding 49
34. Strap iron reinforcement 49
35. Concrete reinforcement at Washington, D.C 58
36. Concrete sewer at Chicago 59
37. Sewer along New York subway 60
38. Concrete sewer at Victoria, B.C 60
39. Brick and concrete sewer at Truro, N.S 61
40. Forms used at Truro, N.S 62
41. Concrete sewer at Swampscott, Mass
42. Sections from catalogue of Blaw Collapsible Steel Centering Co.. 64
43. Sections from catalogue of Blaw Collapsible Steel Centering Co.. . . 65
44. Brick and concrete sewer at Medford, Mass 67
ix
x LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE PAGB
45. Forms used at Medford, Mass 68
46. Brick and concrete sewer on platform 69
47. Sixty-four-inch brick and concrete sewer on firm ground 70
48. Brick and concrete sewer at Altoona, Pa 71
49. Circular section of Melbourne, Aus., outfall 71
50. Egg-shaped section of Melbourne, Aus., outfall 72
51. Section of sewer with basket-handle section 73
52. Section showing continuous wood lagging for wet soil 73
53. Section of Boston Aqueduct 74
54. Section of reinforced concrete aqueduct at Mexico 76
55. Reinforced concrete sewer at Providence, R.I 77
56. Reinforced concrete sewer at Wilmington, Del 78
57. Reinforced concrete sewer at Harrisburg, Pa 78
58. Section of reinforced concrete aqueduct at Jersey City, N.J 81
59. Reinforced concrete sewer, Borough of Queens 81
60. Section of Ingersoll Run sewer, Des Moines, la 83
61. Section of Harlem Creek sewer, St. Louis, Mo 83
62. Section of McKean St. sewer, Philadelphia 84
63. Section of sewer at South Bend, Ind 86
64. Section of intercepting sewer at Cleveland, 0 87
65. Cross-section of manhole 91
65. Cross-section of shallow manhole 92
67. Split pipe in manhole bottom 92
68. Construction of manhole floor 93
69. Drawings of junction manhole 95
70. Manhole from side of brick sewer 97
71. Detail drawing of connection 98
72. Manhole over axis of brick sewer 99
73. High level connection at -Santos, Brazil 100
74. High level connection on outside of manhole 101
75. Inclined connection from high level sewer 102
76. Deep manhole at Melbourne, Australia 103
77. Deep manhole at Cleveland, Ohio 103
78. Slips in sewer at St. Louis, Mo 103
79. Manhole cover designed for Santos, Brazil 105
80. Manhole cover built by Sessions Foundry Co 105
81. Manhole cover from Auburn contract drawings 106
82. Lock used at Ithaca, N.Y 107
83. Lock used at Salt Lake City, Utah 108
84. Dirt pail designed for deep sewers 109
85. Dirt pail designed for shallow sewers 109
86. Dirt pan as built at Ithaca, N.Y no
87. Dirt pail from Baumeister no
88. Lampholes with concrete supports 1 1 1
89. Lamphole cover 112
90. Location of inlets at street corner 114
91. Location of inlets at street corner 115
92. Location of inlets at street corner 115
93. Flat top grating made in Dayton, Ohio 116
94. Circular flat top grating 117
95. Circular dome-shaped grating 117
r/>. ! lorizontal grating with vertical opening 118
LIST OF FIGURES xi
FIGURE PAGB
97. Castings for horizontal grating with vertical opening . . nS
98. Grating for curb corner 1 1,,
99. Grating for straight curb i i(J
100. Catch-basin at Columbus, Ohio 120
101. Catch-basin at Providence, R.I 121
102. Catch-basin at Margate, Kng [99
103. Catch-basin at Michigan City, Ind 123
104. Cast-iron hood for catch- basin trap 124
105. Catch-basin at Wilmington, Del 125
106. Catch-basin at Peoria, 111 1 26
107. Catch-basin at Burlington, Iowa 126
108. Catch-basin at Philadelphia, Pa 127
109. Catch-basin at Washington, D.C 128
no. Catch-basin at Louisville, Ky 129
in. Inlet at Warsaw, N.Y 130
112. Inlet at Tarrytown, N.Y 131
113. Direct siphon at Norfolk, Va 134
114. Bridge designed for sewer crossing 136
115. Inverted siphon at Roanoke, Va 138
116. Inverted siphon at Newton, Mass 139
117. Inverted siphon at New Orleans, La 141
118. Inverted siphon at Woonsocket, R.I 143
119. Inverted siphon at Springfield, Mass 144
120. Inverted siphon under New York subway 145
121. Inverted siphon designed for Ithaca, N.Y 146
122. Inverted siphon at Buenos Ayres 147
123. Inverted siphon at Providence, R.I 149
124. Detail of inverted siphon at Ithaca, N.Y 150
125. Screen chamber for Boston sewer 155
126. Screen chamber for Ithaca sewer 155
127. Screen chamber at Manchester, Eng 158
128. Screen chamber at Providence, R.I 160
129. Rectangular mesh screen at White Plains, N.Y 160
130. Rectangular mesh screen at Marlborough, Mass 161
131. Basket mesh screen at Cranston, R.I 162
132. Horizontal mesh screen at Wayne, Pa 163
I33- Vertical iron-rod screen at Ithaca, N.Y 165
134. Wooden slat screen at Providence, R.I 166
135. Tank screen at Pullman, 111 167
136. Mechanical cleaning rake at Richmond, Va 168
137. Movable screen at Birmingham, Eng 169
138. Location of overflows, Rochester trunk sewer 171
139. Leaping weir at Milwaukee i 73>
140. Parabolic path over leaping weir
141. Overflow weir at Cleveland, Ohio i 75
142. Overflow weir at Providence, R.I i?7
143. Overflow weir at Rochester, N.Y 1 7**
144. Automatic regulator at Boston, Mass 1 79
145. Automatic regulator at Worcester, Mass 180
146. Automatic regulator at Harrisburg, Pa 181
147. Automatic regulator at Brookline, Mass 182
148. Regulating device of Coffin Valve Co 183
xii LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE PAGH
149. Automatic regulator at Woburn, Mass 184
150. Sections of bell-mouth intersection 186
151. Bell-mouth sections at Philadelphia, Pa 188
152. Bell-mouth sections at Boston, Mass 189
153. Bell-mouth sections at Boston, Mass 190
154. Photograph of Providence bell-mouth 191
155. Bell-mouth cover of | -beams with vertical walls 192
156. Perspective sketch of sewer junction at Minneapolis, Minn 193
157. Wooden cradle for brick or concrete sewer 197
158. Ten-inch pipe supported on piles 199
159. Eighteen-inch pipe supported on piles 200
160. Egg-shaped sewer on piles at Cambridge, Mass 201
161. Egg-shaped sewer on piles at Lynn, Mass 202
162. Egg-shaped sewers on piles at Troy, N.Y 203
163. Wooden barrel supported on piles 204
164. Basket-handle sections on piles at Boston, Mass 205
165. Rectangular section on piles at New York, N.Y 206
166. Rectangular section on piles at St. Paul, Minn 207
167. Cross-section of Moon Island embankment, Boston, Mass 208
1 68. Curves of settlement, Moon Island embankment, Boston, Mass. . . 209
169. Protection wall and flap valve for outlet 212
170. Submerged outlet at Binghamton, N.Y 213
171. Outlet pipe in high bank 214
172. Outlet pipe down bluff at Niagara Falls, N.Y 215
173. Section of outlet, Aramingo Canal sewer, Philadelphia 215
174. Outlet sewer, South Metropolitan District, Boston 217
175. Section of outlet, Broadway outfall sewer, New York 218
176. Outlet sewer at Spring Lake, N. J 219
177. Section of wooden outlet, New London, Conn 220
178. Photographs of construction of Ithaca wooden outlet 221
179. Bank protection at Burlington, Iowa 223
1 80. Steel outfall pipe at Toronto, Canada 225
181. V branch with | bend for house connection 228
182. Sketch to record location of V branches 229
183. T branch for connections with deep sewers 231
184. V branch for connections with deep sewers 232
185. Double V branch for connections with deep sewers : 233
1 86. Sketch snowing location of offset stakes 237
187. Sketch showing method of supporting grade boards 239
188. Sketch showing method of supporting grade boards 239
189. Sketch showing method of driving sheeting 247
190. Perspective sketch of Carson trench machine 249
191. Perspective sketch of Lidgerwood cableway 251
192. Photograph of Moore conveying machine 253
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
CHAPTER I.
SEWER PIPE.
DURING the slow development which has taken place, not only
in the design of sewers, but also in the details of their construction,
many kinds of material and many forms of cross-section have
been used, and a great difference in the care displayed in the work
itself has resulted. Stone, brick, wood, concrete, cement pipe,
terra cotta pipe, and even iron pipe have all been used. Sewers
have been made rectangular, horse-shoe shaped, triangular, oval,
egg-shaped, and circular. They have been built of rough field
stone, without mortar, and of paving brick with cement mortar.
They have been rough on the inside and smoothly plastered on
the outside, and vice versa. In the course of years, however,
engineering practice has become crystallized, and engineers have
generally adopted circular glazed terra cotta or vitrified sewer
pipe as the standard conduit for all sewers under 24 inches in
diameter. A large quantity of 30 and 36-inch pipe is also used,
but with that size the practice is not so well established. For still
larger sizes, brick or concrete is used, either separately or together,
according to the judgment of the engineer.
The chief reason for the general adoption of vitrified terra cotta
sewer pipe is probably cheapness, although it has the great addi-
tional advantage of having an impervious surface not affected by
acids or steam, and not abraded by silt in suspension. The
disadvantages are two: first, that it is impossible to prevent leak-
age through the joints; and second, that such pipe has only a
limited strength, and must, therefore, be handled carefully, and
2 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
be thoroughly bedded in place. Compared with stone or brick,
such pipe has the further advantage which comes from a smooth
interior, viz., a greater discharging capacity for the same grade,
an advantage which will be discussed* later. It is not entirely
satisfactory for the two reasons above named, and specifications
are worded to minimize, as far as possible, the inherent defects of
the material. The manufacturer, however, is only able to reach
his standard, and the specifications must be a compromise between
the wishes of the engineer and the present possibilities of the
manufacturer. To make these limitations clear, the following
description of the method of manufacture is given, followed by a
discussion of the strength of the manufactured article.1
Roughly speaking, vitrified terra cotta pipe is made like brick,
of burned clay, but the process is more intricate. The clay must
be better, that is, a purer silicate of alumina, yet with more fluxing
agents, and there must be a proper admixture of sand and loam,
or of old burned pipe, in order to give toughness and prevent
excessive and irregular shrinkage in burning. The temperature
of the kiln must be higher, and the various processes of drying,
heating, burning, and cooling must be more carefully regulated
than in the manufacture of brick. In some plants a careful pro-
portioning by weight of the various ingredients is made, while in
others the manager or foreman mixes two or more piles by barrow-
fuls in such a way as his experience dictates. The plant at
St. Louis is reported to use material as follows : Fire clay, 40 per
cent; surface soil, 40 per cent; yellow clay, 15 per cent; burnt pipes,
5 per cent. The analyses on the following page are taken from
Ries' "Clays," 1906, and show the composition of the clays from
which pipe is made in various parts of the United States.
A plant at Portland, Me., uses a clay mined in New Jcrsrv,
brought by boat to the factory and there mixed with the native
clay and a small proportion of burnt pipe, finely ground.
Probably any clay which is known to make good vitrified brick
1 Eng. News, Vol. 10, p. 329; Mun. Eng. Vol. 9, p. 280. Eng. News, Vol. 27,
p. 624; U. S. Geological Survey, i8th Ann. Rep. Pt. 5, p. 1105. Eng. News,
Vol. 28, p. 473; Brick, May i, and June i, 1899.
SEWER PIPE 3
would make pipe as well, and in fact many factories make both
pipe and brick with the same raw material.
ANALYSES OF SEWER PIPE CLAYS.
Silica
5:7 10
r- 60
6? oo
e-} 06
Alumina
21 2O
24 34.
27 C7
I ^ ?6
j / -u^
Ferric oxide
Ferrous oxide
7-31
6. II
1.87
46
7.72
3-4i
Lime
• 20
.42
44
60
•/u
60
Alagnesia
I ^ 3
77
80
Co
Potash
311
3OO
2 4O
3 66
•j 57
Soda
'2
OI
OQ
2O
v3 O/
Titanium oxide
I IO
•UJ
8^
Water
6.00
6 75
6 4S
7 73
7 27
Moisture
i .30
2 .6?
86
Sulphur trioxide
77
Phosphoric pentoxide
Total
08 87
on 74
100 47
07 06
100 67
In all cases the clay has to be worked up, that is, so spaded and
cut up as to make a mass of uniform moisture and density alone,
and then with the burned pipe or grog.
Fig. i
The most recent plants use the common pug mill (see Fig. i )*
for this purpose, wheeling or conveying the clay into the mill at
1 From Catalogue of Eureka Machine Company, Jackson, Mich.
4 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
one end and catching it at the other for another mixing in the
same or another mill. The large roll mills (see Fig. 2)1 formerly
Fig. 2
used, are mills in which the clay is deposited in a large dish or pan
about ten feet in diameter; a vertical spindle in the center carries a
horizontal bar which extends across the pan and is revolved about
the spindle by suitable bevel gearing. On the horizontal bar are
two symmetrically placed cylindrical rolls of cast iron about four
feet in diameter, weighing three tons each. The outer edge of the
pan is perforated so that the powdered clay can pass through,
while the coarser portions are being continually thrown back by
guides under the rolls. Such a mill answers admirably for break-
ing down old pipe, but clay which has been in the open air is too
wet and tenacious to be thoroughly broken up. For this reason
the pug mill is preferred. The well-ground clay with its admix-
1 From Catalogue of C. W. Raymond Company, Dayton, Ohio.
SEWER PIPE
T5To.4 Sewer Pipe Press.
Steam Cylinder 44 'x 50"
Clay Cylinder 2o"x 56"
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
ture of grog when in a proper state of moisture is brought finally
by an elevator to the top of the press which forms the pipe.
(See Fig. 3.)1
The press consists essentially of two parts : the steam cylinder,
three to four feet in diameter, and the mud cylinder underneath,
about twenty inches in dia-
meter. The pistons of the
two cylinders are direct-con-
nected usually by three piston
rods. The clay or mud is
delivered into the mud cylin-
der automatically at each up
stroke, one charge being suffi-
cient to make several pipes of
the smaller sizes. To form
the pipe, the lower end of
the mud cylinder has attached
to it the die for the particular
sized pipe to be made. (See
Fig.4-)2
The die is of cast iron,
bolted by flange joints on to
the mud cylinder, and so
shaped that the mud forced
against it takes the form of
the socket of the pipe. Above
the socket-former, or lower
end of the die, a straight
cylindrical portion serves to
shape the body or straight
part of the pipe. Inside
Die
Fig- 4
the die is a cast iron bell,
the outside of which forms the inside of the pipe bell and the
1 From Catalogue of the Turner, Vaughn & Taylor Company, Cuyahoga
Falls, Ohio.
2 From Eng. News, Vol. 27, p. 624.
SEWER PIPE 7
pipe. In operation, the mud cylinder being filled, steam is
admitted above, which forces the mud down between the bell
and the socket former, the escape of the mud being prevented by
the table on which the bell stands. This table is then lowered
slowly, the pressure being continued, and the mud, squeezed out
between the bell and the die, forms the hollow cylindrical pipe.
When of proper length the pipe is cut off and is then carefully
set away to dry. It can be readily seen that the mud must be
stiff, in order to stand up under its own weight, and it is found
that practically, even with the stiffest mud, a three-foot pipe is
the longest possible. Any irregularity in mixing or in the
moisture tends to settle the pipe on one side, giving a curve to the
pipe and detracting from its value as straight pipe. All sizes of
pipe are made in the same way, the different diameters being
obtained by using different dies.
The pipes are dried in large rooms, heated by steam, the
process requiring from 3 to 15 days, depending on the weather.
During this time the pipes are cut off to exact lengths, the edges
are rounded, the corrugations are scratched on, and the Y's, T's,
etc., are formed or molded on by hand. When the pipes are well
dried they are wheeled into the kilns, stacked on end, small pipes
inside larger ones, all resting on rings set on the floor to prevent
excessive warping at that point.
The kilns are of brick, beehive shaped, 30 to 40 feet in diameter.
The bottom is formed of firebrick about three feet deep, so placed
as to allow the passage of smoke and gases downward to the flue,
which latter runs horizontally under the bottom of the kiln to the
chimney outside. The fires are built around the outside between
the outside wall and the fire wall, which is about 18 inches inside
and rises to the springing line of the dome, about six feet up.
The hot gases in this way do not strike the pipe directly, but are
reflected from the roof downwards, giving an even heat through
the kiln. The time of burning depends on the size of the kiln,
the kind of clay, etc., but it usually takes about five days, the
increase in temperature being made very gradually, especially
at first. When the pipes have reached the point of vitrifaction,
8 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
about 2400° F., salt in shovelfuls is thrown on the fires, and the
process repeated three or four times an hour. The salt is vola-
tilized in the presence of moisture, and hydrochloric acid is disen-
gaged, which in the presence of the vitreous silicates of the clay
unites to form a double alkaline silicate or vitreous glaze on the
surface of the pipe. This glaze is a chemical union penetrating the
pipe, and is not a surface skin which can scale off. It is very hard,
an emery wheel scarcely cutting it, and while it is admirable in its
resisting power to abrasion, it is so hard and smooth that material
used for joints adheres but imperfectly. A barrelful or less of
salt is used for a kiln 20 feet in diameter and 15 feet high. Com-
mon coarse salt answers the purpose, the sweepings from packing
houses having been found to be satisfactory. The salting being
finished, the fires are banked, the kiln gradually cooled off, and in
four or five days the pipes are taken out ready for market. In
drying and burning, the pipes shrink about 10 per cent in diameter
and in length, so that each pipe is molded about five forty-eighths
inch larger for each inch of diameter, and 10 per cent longer
than is required in the final product. The exact temperature at
which the salt is applied is a matter of importance, and
while pyrometers of various sorts have been tried, dependence is,
as a rule, placed on the experience of workmen, who are guided
by the appearance of small test pieces placed in the kiln within
reach. If the pipe are overburned, they are brittle, and are
likely to have blisters formed in the glaze, especially with lime
in the clay; if the pipe are underburned, the glaze is not well
formed, and the pipe lack strength.
The usual form of sewer pipe is the so-called bell and spigot,
the spigot end being merely the end of the straight pipe, with
no rim as in cast iron pipe, and the bell formed on to the
straight length as shown in Fig. 5.1 Egg-shaped pipe have been
made in small quantities in this country; and in 1897 a pipe,
circular on the outside but with a small channel formed inside of
the thick pipe to accommodate small flows, was patented in Eng-
1 Paving, Vol. 13, p. 377. From Catalogue Monmouth Mining and Manufac-
turing Company.
SEWER PIPE 9
land.1 It is probable that attempts to change the form of the
cross-section will not be successful, since any pipe except circular
would be so warped in burning that the proportion of unsalable
pipe would be large, making the cost of the perfect ones very
high.
Many forms of bells have been made, all with the attempt to
improve the water-tightness of the joint. Pipes have been made
Fig- 5
without bells, the joint being made with rings or sleeves. It has
been claimed that better joints can be made in this way, but
their superiority has never been proved by actual experience. In
England much use has been made of a joint cast onto the
spigot and inside of the bell in such a way that a ball and socket
motion is obtained, allowing small changes in alignment to take
place without breaking the joint or the pipe. Bells much larger
than the ordinary bell are required for this. Their value will
be discussed under the head of joints.
Pipes are made throughout the country of the following com-
1 Paving, Vol. 13, p. 314.
10 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
mercial sizes, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, and 24-inch diameters,
and engineers, in designing, increase the size demanded by theory
so as to use one of the above sizes. It is possible, if a large quan-
tity of an odd size is wanted, to have special dies made, and the
pipe burned to order. Such a requirement, even if the size of the
order is such that the manufacturer is willing to meet the cost of
the die, requires at least a month for the actual manufacture, and
more, if the factory is full with orders for regular sizes. Certain
firms make and keep on hand other sizes, such as 7, 14, 16, 21,
and 22-inch diameters, but in general it is not wise to select one of
these odd sizes, since it either forces a contractor to buy from one
firm, shutting out other bidders, or else adds to the price he must
pay for the pipe, and increases the time required for putting
material on the ground. Of late, larger sizes than 24 inches have
been made, and their use substituted for brick, especially for diam-
eters of 30 and 36 inches. Their adoption is to be decided on
only after a careful study of their cost and of their probable
strength.
The standard length of a sewer pipe has been two feet until
within the past few years, but now two and a half and three-foot
lengths are generally available. Y's and T's, however, are still
made in two-foot lengths only. The advantage in the greater
length lies in the reduction of the number of joints, thus giving a
tighter line in wet ground, and no evidence is forthcoming that the
longer pipes are more likely to break when once placed in the
trench. On bad bottom, where there is danger of settlement, the
longer lengths should be more stable and a better alignment thus
preserved. The engineer is, therefore, justified, since manufac-
turers have proved their ability to make three-foot lengths, in
always specifying that dimension.
The proper thickness of sewer pipe has been much discussed,
the relation of the strength of the pipe to the thickness being
manifest. Since sewer pipe do not carry internal pressure, the
method of determining the thickness must be by the other func-
tion of a pipe, namely, to withstand external pressure — a function
to which theory does not readily lend its aid. The thickness,
SEWER PIPE
II
therefore, is practically that which the experience of manufac-
turers has found to be necessary, and in all factories, that thickness
is nearly, though not entirely, uniform for the different sizes of
pipe. In the early days of the use of sewer pipe when little was
known either of the strength or durability of the material, many
failures resulted from the injudicious haste with which pipes were
used in large quantities without any tests being made as to their
ability to withstand the strains to which they were to be subjected.
As a rule, all the early pipes were made too thin to stand the
weight of the superincumbent earth in deep cuttings, even had
they been of the good quality of the modern pipe. In Croyden,1
England, for example, where sewer pipes were first used, 1 5-inch
pipes were laid in a trench 20 feet deep, and as the pipes were
what we should call bad, and were only five-eighths inch thick,
it is not surprising that the pipe line collapsed, and that a brick
arch had to be built over the top. The thickness has been
increased since that time, however, and at present the average
thickness of standard pipe is as given in the following table.2
Manufacturers also make a thicker pipe in the larger sizes,
intended to be used under railroads, near street surfaces, and in
very deep cuttings. The thickness of this " double-strength
pipe" is also given, its value being discussed later under the head
of strength of pipe.
Size of pipe
6
8
o
IO
12
I C
18
2O
24
T.O
36
Standard
I
4
«
1
Tj
T4
I |
if
>ft
7*
Double strength
T*
T}
T*
l|
2
2\
?f
The joint is the weakest part of a sewer pipe line, because of its
lack of rigidity, and from its failure to be water-tight. In 1891,
there were inaugurated by the Portland Stoneware Company (in
1895 adopted by the Eastern Association of Pipe Manufacturers)
changes in the dimensions of the sockets, in which two classes were
recognized, Standard and Deep-and-wide sockets. The following
1 Latham's Sanitary Engineering, p. 187.
2 Catalogue of American Sewer Pipe Company.
12
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
table gives the depth of socket and the thickness of joint for the
two classes, the relative appearance being shown in Fig. 6.
Size of pipe
6
8
IO
I 2
T C
18
20
24.
Depth Standard joints
i ^
2
2
oi
"i
I*
2 J
7*
Thickness " "
:J
i
a
3
*
I
i
-> .
"$
->|
"§
•7
•J
3i
31
2
/I
Thickness " "
i
I
f
'f
'f
1
4f
Experiments have been made on the relative value of the two
kinds of sockets, and while it has been found in laboratory exper-
iments that on account of the porosity of the cement filler, a well-
made joint in a wide socket allows a greater leakage than in a
Deep and wide
Standard
Fig. 6
standard socket, yet practically the increased space for the joint
filler makes imperfect joints less likely, and really makes a tighter
line. The deep-and-wide sockets should, therefore, always be
used wherever the sewer is laid below ground water, and where
consequently there is danger of leakage into the pipe.
Another recent improvement in the socket is the introduction
of corrugations on the inside of the bell and on the outside of the
spigot, by which the cement is held firmly and cannot be driven
out by settlement or pressure. These corrugations are not added
by all firms, but they are easily scratched on the pipe and should
always be called for in specifications.
CHAPTER II.
SEWER PIPE, Continued.
UP to the year 1890, no comprehensive experiments on the
strength of pipe had been carried out, and no systematic attempts
to discover under what conditions sewer pipe could be safely
trusted to carry its given load had been made. The few tests
recorded before that time are isolated experiments by engineers
made in the course of their regular work. In 1859, Mr. Adams,
City Engineer of Brooklyn, made some crushing tests of the
material used in pipes.1 He prepared some two-inch cubes, and
obtained a pressure of 50,000 pounds, the capacity of the machine,
or 12,500 pounds per square inch, without crushing the material.
He also applied pressure along the top of some domestic and
imported pipes, and found that they broke as follows :
Length.
Diameter.
Pounds.
Pounds per
Linear Foot.
Scotch pipe
Feet.
7
Inches.
18
5542
1847
Scotch pipe
?
12
4000
1333
English pipe
•}
12
4600
1533
English pipe . ...
2
12
1672
836
In 1878, Mr. J. Herbert Shedd,2 City Engineer of Providence,
made some tests on the strength of standard sewer pipes, half-
bedded in sand, with the following results in pounds per linear
foot of pipe.
No. of Kinds.
Minimum.
Maximum.
Average.
12-inch pipes
4
14^6
1765
1601
i5-inch pipes
1 8-inch pipes . . .
4
•?
1261
1464
I765
1942
1452
1670
1 Sewers and Drains for Populous Districts, p. 92.
2 Sewers and Drains for Populous Districts, p. 93.
13
14 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
In 1890, Mr. Malverd A. Howe,1 of the Rose Polytechnic Insti-
tute, undertook to make systematic tests that would be compre-
hensive, so far as American pipes were concerned, and for this
purpose he obtained in the open market specimens of pipe from
the different factories between Wilmington, Del., and St. Louis,
Mo., fifteen different firms being represented. The pipes were
subjected to five different kinds of tests, viz., hydrostatic, drop,
concentrated load, uniform load, and joints.
The hydrostatic tests were made to find out the strength of the
pipe against internal pressure, the ends of single lengths of pipe
being closed and water pumped in until the pipe broke. The
average tensile strength of the material for the different sizes was
as follows :
4 inches 517 Ibs.
6 inches 678 Ibs.
8 inches 552 Ibs.
10 inches 702 Ibs.
12 inches 592 Ibs.
18 inches 529 Ibs.
21 inches 617 Ibs.
24 inches 856 Ibs.
The number of specimens tested for all sizes up to 1 8 inches was
25, and but two above 18 inches. From these results the experi-
menter concluded that the average tensile strength of the material
composing American vitrified sewer pipe was at least 600 pounds
per square inch.
Most of the pipes broke at an internal pressure of about 100
pounds per square inch, and the following table shows the com-
puted thickness of the various sizes, assuming an internal pressure
of 100 pounds per square inch, with a tensile strength of the
material of 600 pounds, as compared with the thicknesses now
made commercially.
Size
6
8
10
12
18
21
24
Theoretical thickness
^Manufactured "
•5°
76
.66
82
.83
no
I .00
I .OS
i-5°
i .39
i-75
J .89
2 .OO
2 .02
The table shows that the thickness of sewer pipe is such that
pipes will stand an internal pressure of 100 pounds and even more
1 Jo. Assn. Eng. So< -., Vol. 10, p. 284.
SEWER PIPE 15
with the smaller sizes before bursting, or a safe pressure of 33
pounds with a factor of safety of three.
The drop test was made to determine the resistance of the pipe
to percussive action, such as a blow from a wagon wheel. It was
made by supporting the pipe on two pieces of wood 2 inches wide,
1 6 inches apart, so arranged that a falling weight would strike the
pipe near its center, midway between the supports. The weight
was a box full of iron, weighing 18 pounds. A rounded strip of
wood on the bottom was the striking part. The length of the drop
was adjustable, but was 12 inches for the first five blows. If the
pipe was not then broken, the length of drop was made 18 inches,
then 24 inches, with 30 inches as a maximum. Twenty lengths
were broken at the first blow, and most of the pipes were broken
in four to ten blows. Mr. Howe's conclusion was that sewer pipe
as made is strong enough to sustain ordinary blows, but it is
evident that where successive blows may be expected, ample
covering of earth or similar material should be provided to dis-
tribute the shock.
The concentrated load test was made by supporting the pipe,
as just described, and then slowly applying the load through the
medium of an hydraulic piston, acting against a small block of
wood at the middle of the top of the pipe. Forty-two pipes of
various sizes were broken, and while the smaller sizes withstood
much more than 2000 pounds, it seemed a safe conclusion that
the average pipe would stand at least that amount concentrated
at the center with the supports 16 inches apart.
The uniform load test was made by bedding the pipe in sand
in a strong box and applying pressure through a sand cover.
Most of the pipe failed by splitting longitudinally at the top, bot-
tom, and sides, and after splitting and taking their new bearings,
were able to carry much heavier loads. The breaking loads,
however, were taken when the pipe cracked. The small sizes
sustained a load of about 8000 pounds per linear foot of pipe, and
the larger sizes a little over 2000 pounds, the conclusion being
that all sizes of pipe will stand a load of 2000 pounds per linear
foot before breaking.
16
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
In 1897, Mr. Barbour, then City Engineer of Brockton, Mass.,
made some experiments1 on the strength of pipe by covering it
with about a foot of earth and applying the pressures by means of
an hydraulic piston pressing down upon the earth cover. He
found that the breaking load per linear foot averaged about
2800 pounds for standard pipe, and about 4200 pounds for
double strength pipe. He also studied the relation between the
strength and thickness and concluded that the strength varied
inversely as the diameter and directly as a function of the thick-
ness, the relation being approximately expressed by the equation
A. 65
P = C—j- , where P is the pressure in pounds per linear foot,
/ is the thickness in inches, and C a constant equal to 33,000.
The table shows the relation obtained experimentally and by
the formula, and their close agreement.
Single Strength, or Standard.
Size.
Thickness.
Strength
by Exper-
iment.
Strength
by
Formula.
Thickness.
Strength
by Exper-
iment.
Strength
by
Formula.
Inches.
6
6oc
Inches.
8
•"95
822
2QO2
oUJO
208?
JO
832
•*vw^
2834
2440
12
IS
18
20
24
.024
.18
.29
•3°5
•47
3226
3207
268l
2584
2549
2862
2890
2790
2560
2598
1.26
I .405
i-54
i-74
2 .02
3916
4562
4146
4119
4334
4028
3855
3738
4113
4382
Double Strength.
Mr. Barbour concludes from his experiments that manufac-
turers should be able to produce, and that engineers should
demand, pipe which would have a breaking load of 3000 pounds
per linear foot for standard pipe, and of 4500 pounds for double
strength pipe, the thickness being so varied according to his
formula or otherwise, that this strength should be obtained in all
sizes. The thickness thus required is given below and may be
compared with the thicknesses given in the table on page 1 1 :
1 Jo. Assn. Eng. Soc., Vol. 19, p. 193.
SEWER PIPE
BARBOUR'S TABLES.
Size.
Thickness
for 3000
Pounds.
Thickness
for 4500
Pounds.
Size.
Thickness
or 3000
Pounds.
Thickness
for 4500
Pounds.
6
o 7
0 8n
I f
I 21
I £4
8 ....
0.82
I .06
I 3^
1 o^-
I 72
10
O Q4
I .21
20
I 44
I 84
12
1. 06
1-36
24
1. 60
2.08
The average breaking load for sewer pipe is unfortunately not
a fair criterion for the strength of the individual pipe. It is cus-
tomary to test pipes roughly by striking them with a hammer in
order to detect by the sound cracked and underburned pipes;
whereupon such defective pieces are thrown out. But even with
such pipes eliminated, those which are apparently perfectly sound
show great differences in strength. For example, in the case of the
1 80 pipes tested by Mr. Barbour, in each size the best pipe with-
stood a load nearly double that withstood by the poorest, the
24-inch pipe varying from 1482 pounds to 3280 pounds per linear
foot.
In Providence, in 1894, the City Engineer1 tested some pipe as
follows :
8-inch, minimum load per foot 757, maximum 2498 pounds.
12-inch, minimum load per foot 924, maximum 2816 pounds.
15-inch, minimum load per foot 1063, maximum 2666 pounds.
i8-inch, minimum load per foot 1305, maximum 2401 pounds.
This shows a great difference in the possible loading, and it also
shows the danger of pipes breaking, if loaded, even approximately,
to what an average pipe would bear.
Mr. Barbour thinks that the average pipe will stand about
2800 pounds, although from his own experiments this amount is
twice that which the poorest pipe actually withstood and 35 per
cent more than the average of the poorest pipes of the 15 different
groups tested.
The tests, moreover, are made on pipes carefully bedded or
supported. In a trench, there is continual danger of the pipes not
1 See Report of City Engineer, p. 41.
1 8 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
being supported carefully, of the dirt not being well tamped back
under the pipes, of the sheeting being withdrawn on one side, and
not on the other, etc. This makes the danger from broken pipes
still greater, and it is a matter of experience that such imperfec-
tions do frequently develop under actual conditions.
For example, Mr. Rust, City Engineer of Toronto, said in
I888,1
We had occasion to take up a short time ago a piece of i8-inch drain laid
with Scotch pipe in a newly annexed territory, when it was found that about 75
per cent of the pipe were cracked, a large majority being broken on bottom, top,
and sides.
Mr. Keating,2 in the city of Halifax, says that it is an unusual
thing to find a pipe sewer over 12 inches in diameter in a perfect
state. He cites a case in Halifax, about 1884, where a long line
of 15-inch pipe collapsed entirely a few months after being laid,
due to the back-filling being frozen and, therefore, imperfectly
tamped in under the pipe.
Mr. J. H. Parker,3 discussing failures of pipe in trench, com-
ments on the frequency of such occurrences, and shows that much
of the trouble is due to the method of draining the trench during
construction, the pumps and drains withdrawing sand and earth
from around the pipe for a distance, in some cases, of as much
as ten feet. The subsequent settlement of the pipe results in
fracture.
Mr. Hastings,4 City Engineer of Cambridge, Mass., has had
the same experience of frequent instances of broken pipe, and
concludes that in soils or under construction methods where
standard pipe would fail, double strength would also fail. He
recommends, therefore, that where the soil is uneven and uncer-
tain, the sewer pipe be surrounded or reinforced with brick or
concrete. He cites instances where lo-inch and 1 2-inch pipe in a
7-foot trench have been crushed by the passage of a steam roller
on the surface of the street above.
1 Trans. Can. Soc. C. E., Vol. 2, p. 306.
2 Trans. Can. Soc. C. E., Vol. i, p. 517.
8 W. Soc. Engineers, Vol. i, p. 517.
4 Assn. Eng. Soc., Vol. 22, p. 87.
SEWER PIPE 19
At Oberlin, Ohio,1 where the sewer after completion was tested
by passing a wooden ball through the pipes, 1300 linear feet were
found broken out of a total length of 8650 feet of 1 8-inch sewer,
continuous breaks occurring from 25 to 500 feet each. The pipe
was good pipe, carefully laid, with bell-holes, but with untamped
trenches. In relaying, shale pipe was used with careful tamping.
In a month, 150 feet of this was broken.
In the construction of the joint trunk sewer in New Jersey, Mr.
Alexander Potter was able to investigate this question with the
following results:2
On 26,303 feet of 24-inch pipe, breaks occurred aggregating 1500 feet, each
break running from 15 to 150 feet, nearly all of them being either in gravel
or rock cuttings. No breaks were found in quicksand. The depths of cuts where
breaks occurred varied from 6 to 20 feet, but more broken pipes were found at
the lesser depths.
On 8197 feet °f 22-inch standard pipe, at depths varying from 6 to 20 feet,
much of which was laid on timber foundation, and none on gravel or broken stone,
not a single cracked pipe was found.
Fourteen breaks occurred on 4382 feet of 2o-inch pipe, aggregating 500 feet
in all. All of these breaks occurred in rock cuttings where the pipe was tempo-
rarily supported on blocks until selected material was rammed solidly around and
under the pipe. A close inspection of the uncovering of the pipe revealed the fact
that at certain places sufficient spaces had not been left at the springing line of
the pipe to allow room for the proper ramming of the back-filling around the
lower half of the pipe.
On the short stretch of 1 8-inch pipe, laid on a heavy grade, the sewer col-
lapsed shortly after construction, due to the flood of water washing out the newly
filled-in material over the sewer under the macadam pavement which dropped
on the pipe and ruptured it.
Mr. Potter's conclusion is that
the larger sizes of vitrified pipe should not be used in sanitary sewer construc-
tion, say on 2O-inch and over, except on a concrete base, and the relative cost of
other material should be compared upon this assumption. On sizes smaller than
20-inch, concrete should be used under the vitrified pipe far more generally than
it is at present.
The author, however, in 1894, laid about 3000 feet of 24-inch
double strength pipe in a trench 8 to 16 feet deep, and so far as
1 Eng. News, Vol. 31, p. 205.
2 Spec. Rept. on Joint Trunk Sewer System in Valleys of Rahway and Eliza-
beth Rivers.
20 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
he can ascertain by the records of house connections, none of the
pipe has been broken.
The weight of superincumbent earth on a 24-inch pipe, assum-
ing (which is doubtful) that the full weight of the earth presses
on the pipe, would be, for a 2O-foot trench, 2 X 20 X 100, or 4000
pounds, the weight of a cubic foot of earth being taken at 100
pounds. From references given on page 17 the strength of 24-
inch standard pipe may be as low as 1482 pounds, so that break-
age under such conditions is not surprising. Mr. Barbour thinks
from his experiments that in trenches over 10 feet deep, the
pressure of the earth on the pipes is a definite ratio of the weight
of the superincumbent earth, the ratio being the difference
between the coefficient of friction for that earth and unity.
This implies a ratio running from 35 per cent for sand to 65
per cent for clay. But even with this assumption, the pressure
of the earth on the pipe for clay filling would be more than the
strength of the pipe could stand, and a failure might be reason-
ably expected.
The usual method of making cement joints in sewer pipe is
to fill the space between the bell and spigot with cement,
sometimes introducing first a strand of oakum into the bottom
of the joint. That this may give a tight joint is proved by
the fact that .cement joints are frequently used for gas pipes
without appreciable leakage. Laboratory tests where the joint
between the two sewer pipes is made in full view, well com-
pacted, and given two weeks or more to harden, show that
such a joint allows but a negligible amount of leakage. But
the fact that the number of joints in a sewer line is large, that
sewers are laid in deep trenches, frequently bedded in mud or
quicksand, between sheeting boards where room is limited, causes
cement joints in sewer pipes to be generally unsatisfactory. Mr.
Howe,1 in his series of tests made a number of cement joints,
under the most favorable conditions, with all parts of the joint
equally visible and accessible, and yet with all possible care used,
with the joints hardened from one to six weeks, and with
practically no leakage with the pipe barely full of water, some
1 Loc. cit.
SEWER PIPE
21
of the joints would allow no pressure at all, and the best of
them failed utterly under a pressure of 15 pounds per square inch.
The fact that when the pipes concerned in the joint were held
together by iron rods to prevent axial motion, they withstood much
higher pressures, shows that the failure is due probably to the
water under pressure getting behind the end of the spigot. The
laboratory tests that have been made indicate that even with
every precaution taken, and solely on account of the porosity of
the cement, a leakage of about 5000 gallons per mile per day
for 6-inch pipe must be expected as a minimum, this amount
increasing approximately as the square of the diameter for other
sizes. Under actual conditions, however, this amount may
very easily increase four or five times. A proper care in making
cement joints in sewer lines would undoubtedly diminish the
leakage through them, such care being expended on having the
cement mixed to just the right consistency, so that it may be
rammed, on having the cement thoroughly rammed into the
joint completely around the pipe, on having the trench kept free
from water until the cement has set, and on having the joints
undisturbed by careless workmen until the cement has thoroughly
hardened. It is an advantage to have two or three pipes jointed
on the bank, especially in the case of 6-inch or 8-inch pipe to be
laid below ground water level, the joints made out of the trench
Fig. 7
being better than those made in. Fig. 7 1 shows a form of sup-
port suggested by Mr. Coffin, as suitable for this purpose, and
1 Assn. Eng. Soc., Vol. 13, p. 712.
22 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Fig. 81 shows an auxiliary device for holding the lengths of
pipe, so joined, rigid while they are lowered into the trench.
Improvements in joints as they have been suggested or actually
put to test, divide themselves naturally into two classes, viz., first,
those where the ordinary bell and spigot pipe is used, but where,
Fig. 8
instead of cement, some other jointing material is substituted; and
second, where, instead of the ordinary form of pipe, a modified
form of bell or spigot, or both, is used.
In the first class several substitutes for cement have been tried,
among which sulphur and sand, with or without tar in addition,
is the most common. With tar, the proportion being about one
part of tar, four parts of sulphur, and six parts of sand, the mix-
ture is that used in the so-called Stanford joint, popular for many
years in England. The late Colonel Waring used it in Stamford,
Conn., and in Norfolk, Va.,2 though with doubtful success. Mr.
Mohun, Chief Engineer of the Sewerage Works of Victoria, B.C.,
however, was well satisfied with its use in that city.3 To prepare
the mixture, which is molded on to the pipe so that a water-tight
slip joint is obtained, the sulphur and sand are heated separately
in kettles, then mixed and the tar added, and while still hot the
mixture is poured into the molds which form the castings. The
castings are made with the pipe vertical, exposing it on all sides
for inspection. The composition cools in a few moments, and
the molds, shown in Fig. 9, are ready to be used with another
pipe. The pipes, thus molded, are laid by coating the joint with
some heavy oil or grease and simply shoving the pipes together.
The defect of this joint as first made was that the surfaces in con-
tact were conical, so that no movement of the pipe was possible
1 Eng. News, Vol. 33, p. 122. 2 Waring's Sewerage, pp. 104, 153.
8 Trans. Can. Soc. C. E., Vol. 10, p. 84.
SEWER PIPE
without destroying the joint or breaking the pipe. An English
firm, Doulton & Co.,1 casts the material so as to make a ball
Wooden
/ Lifting Bar
Enlarged view of
joint
Moulds m place
MALE MOULD
~~R~~ ~^--~~ ~~--— --o
Q ~- ^a* *T ~"~
-— - f» <>
I '
Details of cast iron moulds
Fig. 9
and socket joint, allowing a small deflection, an improvement
much appreciated by English engineers. The author has made
and tested the ordinary form of these joints, and believes that if
1 Doulton's Catalogue.
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
the space between the bell and spigot could be increased, the
joints would be very serviceable, but with the present dimensions
of American pipe there is not space enough to give a proper
thickness to the casting.
Mr. Potter,1 for pipes in wet ground in connection with the
joint trunk sewer of New Jersey, omitted the tar, and used only
the sulphur and sand mixture, pouring it as a lead joint in iron
pipe would be poured. He claims in this way to be able to get a
practically water-tight joint at a cost but little above that of the
ordinary cement joint. He used from 35 to 45 per cent of sand.
The larger portion of this sand was used when the temperature
of the air was above 35° F. His experience indicates that even
in winter, when the rapid cooling makes fine hair cracks appear,
the composition is practically water-tight, provided the mixture
fills the joint space completely. The finer the sand, the better the
results obtained, and it is possible to buy the sulphur and sand,
of the proper fineness, all mixed, from the sulphur manufacturers.
The cost of the mixture was $40 per ton, and the cost of the
joint for the 8-inch pipe was 2.5 cents. The experience of the
author indicates that it requires some little practice to regulate
the temperature of the mixture, too low a temperature reducing
the fluidity, and too high a temperature causing the mixture to
become thick and pasty, so that it will not pour. The material
and corresponding cost for different sizes of pipe are given by
Mr. Potter as follows:
Pounds
of
Cost of Joints.
Cost per Foot.
Size.
Mixture
per
. Joint.
Mixture.
Gasket.
Labor.
Total.
3 -Foot
Length.
a-Foot
Length.
24
10
•125
.02
•13
•2Q5
.10
•IS
22
9
.112
.02
•13
.282
•095
•14
2O
8
.10
.02
.12
.260
.090
•13
18
7
.087
.02
.11
•247
.08
.12
15
5-5
.069
.01
.10
.187
.065
•095
12
4-2
.052
.01
.09
.162
•°55
.08
IO
3-3
.041
.01
.08
.141
•045
.07
8
2-5
.031
.01
.07
.121
.04
.06
1 Special Report on Joint Trunk Sewer.
SEWER PIPE 25
Another mixture also used by Mr. Potter in this work was a
combination of North Carolina pine tar and cement, mixed and
kneaded until about the consistency of putty.1 This can be forced
into the joint even under water so as to completely fill the joint
space. In laboratory experiments of the author, the material
has the disadvantage of hardening so slowly that, in a horizontal
position and especially on warm days, the material settles slowly
by its own weight, leaving an open space at the top of the pipe.
Mr. Potter had the same experience, the tendency to sag offset-
ting, in his opinion, the advantages which the plasticity of the
material offered.
Asphalt has been used as a substitute for cement, the first tests
and use probably being at Frankfort-am-Main about 1896.
Mr. H. W. Lindley 2 there used ordinary sewer pipe, and a mix-
ture of Trinidad liquid asphalt with solid bitumen. This was
poured hot into the joint as in jointing iron pipe. In this country,
equal quantities of Trinidad bitumen and rock asphalt have been
used in the same way. At Steelton, Pa.,3 strips of burlap, 4 inches
wide, were soaked in hot asphalt, twisted, and calked into the
joint like oakum. It was claimed that joints thus made, when
hard, stood an internal pressure of 50 pounds per square inch,
without giving way, the time to harden being about 30 minutes.
At Oakland, Cal.,4 pipes without bells were used, and the joints
made by wrapping a wide strip of burlap around the joint. The
burlap was soaked in hot asphalt and tied on to both pipes tightly.
The engineer, Mr. Miller, reported at the time that he was able to
get a joint in this way that would stand an internal pressure of
200 pounds per square inch — a seeming impossibility.
Considerable improvement in the ordinary cement joint may
be obtained, especially in wet ground, by wrapping the joints
tightly with cloth. At Medford, Mass., Mr. Barnes used cheese-
cloth; 5 in Ithaca, N. Y., the sewer superintendent uses table oil-
Loc. cit.
Paving, Vol. 30, p. 35.
Eng. News, Vol. 41, p. 405.
Paving, Vol. 19, p. 45, and Eng. Rec., Vol. 41, p. 571.
Paving, Vol. 13, p. 306.
26 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
cloth. This latter material holds the cement up to the joint even
in water and allows it to harden without falling away from the
pipe.
Since defective joints add so largely to the expense of a sewerage
system (if ground water is to be kept out), requiring the use of
cast iron pipe or a large expense in maintenance for handling
the extra water, it would seem desirable that if a better material
than cement is to be had that it should be used to hold the leakage
down to a minimum. Instances are by no means rare in this
country of sewerage systems being practical failures through
the large amount of ground water leaking into the system, and
the importance of this subject of joint-making can hardly be over-
estimated.
In order to prevent leakage, many special forms of joints have
been made in England,1 and pipe manufacturers regularly supply
these forms to the trade. The most common of the special forms
is the Stanford joint already referred to. The pipes may be had
with the composition already cast on, and either in the conical or
spherical section, the latter being preferred. Figs. 10 and n
show the two forms of section.
The Archer joint shown in Fig. 12 demands a special form of
pipe, requiring the bell end to be changed into a double groove,
into which the tongue of the spigot end may fit. In making the
joint a band of clay or other material is placed in the groove so
that the tongue, on being driven home, is sealed at its base.
Then Portland cement grout, 3 cement to 2 water, is poured
through the hole on top so as to fill the joint. The joint is
claimed to be entirely water-tight.
The Hassal joint calls for no different form of pipe, except per-
haps a wider socket, but it requires two composition rings to be
cast on to the bell and spigot ends, exactly as if for a double Stan-
ford joint. (See Fig. 13.) Between these rings cement grout is
poured to fill the intervening space. These pipes were used
extensively in Southampton, England, where new works have
recently been constructed.
1 See Moore's Sanitary Engineering.
SEWER PIPE
Fig. 10
Fig. ii
Fig. 13
28 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Other forms, which are but variations of the above, are on the
market, but the principle is that of one of these two.
The Sykes patent joint, shown in Fig. 14, however, is a new
type, the joint being due to a screw thread formed in the pipe,
Fig. 14
a mixture like putty being first put in at the shoulder of the
thread so that an effectual seal is obtained. It is stated that
this joint has withstood an hydraulic pressure of 140 pounds per
square inch.
CHAPTER III.
BRICK SEWERS.
WHEN a sewer has a diameter greater than 36 inches, a brick
or concrete conduit must be used instead of tile pipe, and it is
not unusual for these materials to be used in sizes as small as 24
inches. Where the soil is wet and there is danger of infiltration,
pipe should be used up to the largest size made. If the ground is
dry, the cheapest construction should be followed. A further
advantage, however, belongs to the pipe, viz., its greater smooth-
ness, giving the pipe line, as compared with brick, a smaller
coefficient of roughness or a larger coefficient of flow. Compare,
for example, a mile of 36-inch pipe with a coefficient of roughness
(n, in Kutter's formula) of .on, with the same length of brick
sewer, whose coefficient is .013. The grade for the pipe to secure
a velocity of 2.5 feet per second is i in 2130, or .046 per cent. For
the brick sewer the required grade for the same velocity is i in
1444, or .07 per cent. The brick sewer would therefore be 1.27
feet deeper in the ground than the pipe sewer at the lower end,
an increase of excavation of about 600 cubic yards.
In some localities, as in Nova Scotia, where English pipe is
generally used, and in the western states of this country, trans-
portation charges may be so high as to make the use of brick or
concrete, even with the larger amount of excavation, the cheaper;
but in general, it may be said that economy will be best served by
not using brick until the size required has exceeded that of the
largest pipe made.
Brick for sewers should be smooth and especially hard burned
— smooth, in order to reduce the friction and to prevent the
arrest of floating particles, and hard, in order to reduce the wear-
ing away of the brick by the attrition of the silt in suspension.
Well-burned arch building brick are often used, but paving brick
29
30 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
of the smaller sizes offer an admirable combination of all the
needed qualities except perhaps economy. In some localities,
second-class pavers may be had at a price but little in excess of
the cost of the best building brick.
Paving brick have the advantage of
being impervious and non-absorp-
tive. Since smoothness and tough-
ness are essential only in the bottom
of the sewer, it is common to econo-
mize by building only that part of
paving brick or of the best building
Fi r brick, using for the backing, the
outer rings, and for the arch, ordi-
nary building brick. (See Fig. is.)1 The plastering is then
depended on to prevent infiltration.
Where egg-shaped brick sewers are built, the small radius of the
invert requires the joints on the outside to be excessively thick,
as shown in Fig. 16, which has been carefully drawn to scale; and
to avoid this element of constructional weakness, invert blocks
are often used, as shown in the same figure. These blocks are
made of terra cotta and replace about four rows of brick. Fig. 1 7
shows the form and dimensions of the standard blocks made by
the American Sewer Pipe Company. These are about a foot
long, have a vertical rib in the center, a plane bottom, and the top
surface conforms in curvature to the radius of the sewer in which
they are to be built. Talbot's block, shown in Fig. 18, however,2
has the top surface with a radius of three inches, in order to
increase the hydraulic radius for small flows. The sides of the
block are inclined at such an angle that they make the abutments
for the brick side walls. The use of these blocks in dry soils has
a distinct advantage, the alignment being accurately preserved, the
surface of the blocks being smoother than that of the bricks, and
the large blocks securing more rapid work. In wet soil, or in
unstable soil, their use is questionable. It is claimed that if the
1 Eng. News, Vol. 46, p. 272.
2 Paving, Vol. 16, p. 154.
BRICK SEWERS 31
blocks are set on planks that there is no settlement and that the
hollows in the blocks act as a drain to carry off the ground water,
to the great advantage of the sewer. But the joints between suc-
cessive blocks are weak, and in a large flow ground water must
surely find its way through the joints into the sewer. Latham,
the eminent English Sanitary Engineer, says that while these
blocks act as drains during construction to remove the subsoil
Fig. 16
water, they should be stopped up as soon as possible, and may
well be filled with concrete their entire length, the reason being
that particles of earth are washed from around each joint into the
drain, and a settlement fatal to the integrity of the sewer follows..
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
BRICK SEWERS
33
He gives as his preference a form of invert block, shown in Fig. 19,*
the block being solid, with grooves on sides and ends.
The block is so laid as to break joints, the jointing cement
entering the groove on all sides, thus effectually tying the whole
together. In view of Latham's experience and statement, it would
Fig. 19
seem that the hollow blocks should not be used for drainage;
instead, if subsoil drainage is necessary, it should be obtained
through a special pipe laid below the sewer grade.
An attempt is made in the invention of the Babcock Hollow-
Invert Block to remove the difficulties inherent to the use of
hollow blocks for drainage, by providing a special means for the
Fig. 20
admission of ground water. Fig. 20 shows the construction of
the blocks.2 It is claimed for these blocks that on account of
the circuitous way by which the ground water gets into the blocks
that no soil washings will occur, and further that the joints between
1 Latham's Sanitary Engineering, p. 221.
2 Redrawn from catalogue.
34
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
the separate blocks are so designed that there will be no leakage
from the blocks up into the sewer itself. This seems to the author
doubtful, and he would prefer in all cases to use separate drain pipes.
Brick sewers possess the advantage over pipe sewers that their
cross-section can be varied to suit special and local conditions, as
well as to secure more uniform flow with varying depths of flow.
For the latter purpose egg-shaped sewers are used, their advantage
having been pointed out in Chapter XVI of " Sewer Design." 1
The number of bricks used in egg-shaped sewers is slightly in excess
of circular sewers of the same capacity, and the following tables
give data as to the comparative dimensions of sewers of the same
capacity, and the number of brick necessary for different sizes.
QUANTITY OF BRICKWORK FOR CIRCULAR SEWERS.
From Wollheim's "Sewerage Engineer's Notebook."
Diameter.
Cubic Yards of Brickwork per Lineal Foot.
Ft. In.
4} In. Thick.
9 In. Thick.
13^ In. Thick.
1 8 In. Thick.
2 O
IO7.
240
7
A O
.260
6
. 12?.
.28?
Q
A «5
. I 37
o
V
3 o
• l j I
• 147
, 7,27
o
7
• x T- /
• o* i
• 347
o
6
. I7O
' OT' /
* A / w
.l80
' 3O3
40
AT.
670
w
. 2OO
A.-11
• **/**
6
2J7
460
777
9
4s)
.223
. <^. w
.480
• I o I
.770
5 o
•233
.500
.800
3
•243
.520
.830
6
.256
•543
.867
.266
n<"v*i
6 o
.277
•59°
• 930
•31
3
.287
.613
.970
•36
6
.300
•633
.00
.40
9
.310
•653
.03
-44
7 o
.320
•673
.06
.48
3
•33°
.700
. IO
•53
6
•343
.720
• X3
•57
9
•353
.740
. 16
.61
8 o
•363
.760
.19
•65
3
.376
.786
•23
.70
6
•387
.807
.26
•75
9
•397
.827
.29
•79
9 o
.407
.850
•32
•83
3
.420
•873
•36
.88
6
• 430
•893
•39
.92
9
.440
•913
.42
.96
10 0
•453
•937
.46
2.01
1 Ogden's Sewer Design, p. 192.
BRICK SEWERS
35
QUANTITY OF BRICKWORK FOR EGG-SHAPED SEWERS.
From Wollheim's " Sewerage Engineer's Notebook."
Dimensions
Ft. In. Ft. In
Area
in
Square
Feet.
Cubic Yards of Brickwork per Lineal Foot.
4i In. Thick.
9 In. Thick.
13^ In. Thick.
2 0X3 o
4.600
.127
.287
.480
2 4X3 6
6.261
•143
•323
•533
2 8X4 0
8.178
.163
.360
•59°
3 0X4 6
10.350
.180
•396
•643
3 4X5 o
12.778
.200
•433
.700
3 8X5 6
15.461
.217
.470
•753
4 0X6 o
18.400
•237
.506
.807
4 4X6 6
21.594
•2S7
•543
.867
4 8X7 o
25.044
•273
•580.
.916
5 0X7 6
28.750
•293
.617
•973
5 4X8 o
32.711
.310
•653
1.027
5 8X8 6
36.928
-.33°
.690
1.083
6 0X9 o
41.400
•347
.726
1. 136
NOTE. — The quantity of brickwork for a new egg-shaped sewer is from one to
two per cent less than that for a standard egg-shaped sewer of equal internal dimen-
sions, and for all practical purposes may therefore be taken as equal to the same.
To compare the amount of brickwork in circular sewers and
in egg-shaped sewers, Folwell says that the diameter of a
circular sewer having an equal area with an egg-shaped sewer
is 1.209 D where D is the horizontal diameter of the egg-shaped
sewer. Wollheim says that the transverse diameter of an egg-
shaped sewer, of equal discharging capacity with a circular
sewer whose diameter is unity, is 0.8388. The latter also gives
this rule to determine the relative proportions of an egg-shaped
and a circular sewer to deliver equal volumes, provided they
both flow full and have the same fall, viz.,
Diam. of circle : radius of egg-shape : : 0.300 : 0.116 or radius
of egg-shape equals diam. of circle X 0.39.
For further discussion of the mathematical elements involved,
articles may be found in Eng. News, Vol. 43, pp. 259 and 357;
also Eng. News, Vol. 44, pp. 28 and 94.
The proper thickness of a brick sewer must be determined
chiefly by experience. Up to 36 inches diameter or 2 feet 8 inches
by 4 feet o inches egg-shape, in firm and unyielding soils, a half-
brick of four and one-half inches thickness is considered sufficient.
In soft, yielding soils, however, this is not safe, and either con-
36 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
crete backing must be used under the haunches or the sewer made
9 inches thick. An example of a failure occurred during the
construction of a 2 X 3-foot brick sewer at Newton, Mass., where
in passing through quicksand the arch settled so much that the
thickness had to be increased to 9 inches, though elsewhere 4^
inches was sufficient. On the other hand, in firm, dry clay,
4j-inch walls may be used for even larger sewers, as the following
examples show:
At South Bend, Ind., the city engineer, by an experience of
many years, has become convinced that a 4-inch wall is ample,
and in 1894 he wrote:1 "We continue to construct brick
sewers up to 48 X 68 inches of a single ring, that prove per-
fectly stable in our soil." He built a single ring four-foot sewer
in a i2-foot trench, which in 1893 had lasted for 30 years.
The 48 X 68-inch sewer is in a 22-foot trench, and seems
perfectly stable.
In Springfield, 111.,2 the construction of a y-foot circular brick
4-inch thick sewer was begun in 1894, and is probably the largest
single-ring brick sewer ever built. The brick used are side-cut,
shale pavers, and they are laid in 1:2 cement mortar. The
adoption of such a doubtful construction was due entirely to a
small appropriation and to the stability of the clay soil. Mr.
Richard, the engineer, says he would not advocate the construc-
tion of all sewers of this dimension with a single ring, but that in
many localities they can be used with a great saving to the tax-
payers.
Baldwin Latham gives the following formula,3 which he says
is convenient for determining the proper thickness : / = - — , where
/ is the thickness of the brickwork in feet, d the depth of excava-
tion in feet, and r the external radius of the sewer in feet. That
this formula can be only approximate is apparent from its form,
no account being taken of the character of the soil or of the fact
1 Paving, Vol. 6, p. 10.
3 Paving, Vol. 7, p. 17; Proc. 111. Soc. C. E., 1895.
3 Latham's Sanitary Engineering, p. 226.
BRICK SEWERS 37
that the thickness may increase indefinitely with the depth of the
cutting.
Scheffle, a noted French railroad engineer, says, in speaking of
arch linings for tunnels, " I believe that in earth of average charac-
ter, the load on the arch lining of a two-track tunnel never exceeds
that due to the weight of the superincumbent earth of 30 to 40
feet depth, and that for a single-track tunnel the depth would be
considerably reduced." In the narrow sewer trench, the depth
of earth furnishing load would be still more decreased, so that
Latham's formula would be limited in its use to depths within
that limit. Mr. Barbour has made experiments on this point,
and finds that with the width of trench experimented on, from
3 to 8 feet, the percentage of the load transmitted to a buried
structure is constant for a fill of more than ten feet, and in no
case below that depth is the full weight of the superincumbent
earth carried to the arch. His experiments are the only ones,
so far as the author knows, on this subject, and his conclusions
are worth repeating here, since they bear directly on the loading
to be imposed on the sewer arch. The thickness of the arch ring
should be determined by the loading on the same, and therefore
the inquiry into the loading is pertinent.
The experiments1 were made in a trench dug for the purpose,
from 3 to 8 feet wide, 5 feet long, and 1 1 feet deep. A calibrated
hydraulic press was placed in the bottom so arranged that the
pressure could be read on the surface of the ground. On the
press a platform was built on which the filling was placed. The
filling was of loam, or sand and gravel, and the sides of the trench
were sheeted, left in earth with vertical side and with sides bat-
tered at different angles. In one experiment, the sheeting was
purposely roughened by nailing on cleats. Mr. Harbour's con-
clusions were as follows: First, that the friction of the earth
against the sides of the trench has little effect, but that the cohe-
sion of the filling material is the factor determining the net
pressure. Second, the cohesion increases rapidly to a depth of
about five feet, and from there it changes slightly up to ten feet,
1 Assn. Eng. Soc., Vol. 19, p. 193.
38 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
where it becomes almost constant. Third, in the case of two
kinds of material the per cent of the weight of the superincum-
bent earth is nearly constant above ten feet of filling, and is
practically the difference between unity and the coefficient of
friction for the material in question, viz., 31 per cent for loam and
36 per cent for gravel. Fourth, if this may be considered a law,
and extended to wet clay with a coefficient of 35, the greatest per-
Surface of Ground
Fig. 21
centage of the weight of superincumbent earth would be 65 per
cent. Fifth, the addition of concentrated loads on the filling
adds a percentage of pressure to the pipe, but the increase is in a
less ratio than that found for the filling, so that the filling ratio is
safe for any concentrated loading.
BRICK SEWERS
39
Surface of Ground
Fig. 22
40 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
For the sake of illustration, the above data may be applied to
the selection of a 24-inch pipe for an assumed trench in gravel,
15 feet of cover on the pipe, the gravel weighing 115 pounds
per cubic foot. The weight on the pipe then is 115 X 2 X 15, or
Equilibrium Polygons.
— Sewer Empty.
Vert. Press.of Earth.
Resultant of Hor. and
Vert. Thrusts of Ear.th
Fig. 23
3450 pounds per running foot, and the pressure transmitted to
the pipe is 3450 pounds X 36 per cent, or 1242 pounds.
Standard pipe should sustain a load of 3000 pounds per lineal
foot without breaking, but the pipe as made in 24-inch sizes
BRICK SEWERS 41
only average about 2000 pounds. Mr. Barbour thinks that in
order to allow for weak, cracked, or underburned pipe, a factor
of safety of 3 should be used, making the safe load on the pipe
about 700 pounds per lineal foot. The inference then is that
Fig. 24
double-strength pipe should be used, or else some concrete
reinforcement.
For sewers larger than 6 feet diameter an analysis of the
strains in the brick arch should be made, together with the
abutment reactions. If the soil on the side of the trench is
not considered firm enough to withstand the thrust of the arch,
42 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
additional brickwork or other masonry backing must be added,
the maximum amount being that necessary to act as an abut-
ment if the arch were built entirely above ground. A thorough
study of the strains in the arches of large sewers and the neces-
sary amount of masonry backing to take up those strains was
given to the intercepting sewers of the city of Philadelphia by
Mr. Rudolph Hering, and described by him in an interesting
Fig. 25
paper before the American Society of Civil Engineers.1 Figs. 21
and 22 show the lines of pressures as determined for the two
given arches with the assumed loading and the variation in
the thickness of the arch in order to keep this line within
the middle third. Fig. 23 shows an investigation of the same
1 Trans. Am. Soc. C. E., Vol. 7, p. 252.
BRICK SEWERS
43
BRICK SECTION
CONCRETE SECTION
.1
' jj 0 0 !
I;
O
t
ll
*-12*»
] I
^
1
<-12->
H
Spa<
ngof
•^S/1
Bents 3'6* c. to
\
c. of I
•"•v/^
iles
J§ub. grade
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
44
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
sort but made more complete, 4 different lines of pressures
being drawn for 4 different sorts of loading, and the thickness
Fig. 28
being determined so that the line will fall within the middle
third for all cases. The method of analysis by which the lines
of pressure are drawn may be found in Church's " Mechanics,"
BRICK SEWERS 45
Chapter X, in Howe's " Symmetrical Masonry Arches," and in
many other treatises and text-books on arches.
If the earth filling were perfectly compacted and noncom-
pressible, no thickening of the arch would be necessary, and
there would be no need of any abutment, the thickness of the
arch being carried around uniformly. Between this condition
and that where the filling cannot be depended on for any resist-
ance, there are intermediate conditions where a partial backing
must be substituted, the amount of backing being determined
altogether by the judgment of the engineer. The following
examples are given to show the actual variation in practice, the
thickness being partly a matter of the filling, and partly a matter
of the caution or boldness of the engineer.
The section shown in Fig. 24 of the Washington, D.C.,
sewer1 is used for all sizes between 2 feet 6 inches X 3 feet 9
inches and 3 feet 3 inches X 4 feet ioj inches, no single-ring
sewers being laid. If the soil is yielding, however, the invert is
made heavier, as shown in Fig. 25, one row of brick being cut
out. In these two drawings a terra cotta block is shown in
the invert, flanked on each side by six vitrified or paving brick.
The other brick shown are ordinary red building brick, the
whole surrounded with concrete.
Fig. 26 (on piles)1, in its left half shows a brick section
for a sewer 5 feet 9 inches diameter, 12 J inches, or three
brick thick, the placing of the concrete backing being more
economical.
Fig. 27 shows a section of a seven-foot brick sewer at Ottawa,
Can., in rock, and illustrates how the uneven surface of the
rock may be smoothed up with concrete in readiness for the
rings of brickwork.2
Fig. 28 shows a section of the 6-foot main sewer in New
Orleans, the uncertain and water-bearing soil requiring the
timber foundation with tongue and grooved sheeting.3
1 Report of Eng. Dep. of the Dist. of Col. for year ending June 30, 1895.
2 Engineering Record, Vol. 40, p. 600.
3 Assn. Eng. Soc., Vol. 27, p. 199.
46 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Fig. 29 shows a section of the 94-inch Delgany Street sewer in
Denver, Col. A large part of the sewer is on made ground,
Fig. 29
Concrete
Stability of. the Excava
Fig. 30
and a part of it is above ground so that the heavy section shown
was required.1
1 Eng. Nc-ws, Vol. 34, p. 430; Am. Soc. C. E., Vol. 35, p. 102.
BRICK SEWERS 47
Fig. 15, already referred to, shows a section of the sewer
masonry in open cut 40 X 60 inches in Sixtieth Street sewer
tunnel, Brooklyn. The material is firm sand, carrying con-
siderable water; it will not stand up during excavation, but is
hardly unstable enough to class as quicksand.1
Fig. 31
Fig. 30 shows a typical cross-section of an egg-shaped sewer
whose vertical diameter is from 4 to 6 feet. In a rock trench,
as shown on the right half of the drawing, concrete backing is
used in sufficient quantity only to fill up the irregularities of the
rock which is excavated to fit the outside of the sewer. In
earth excavation, enough concrete is placed to act as an abut-
ment, the amount being made to vary with the stability of the
earth. The design shown is that of the West Side Trunk sewer
in Rochester, N. Y. Fig. 31 shows a section of the same
sewer at a point where the vertical diameter is 8 feet 7 inches
and the maximum horizontal diameter is 9 feet 3 inches, the
two conditions of backing being shown as before.
1 Eng., Vol. 46, p. 272.
48 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
The brickwork of sewers is generally laid in rowlock bond, so
called (see Fig. 32); that is, the brick are laid as stretchers and
separately in the different rings, the bond being made up only by
Fig. 32
the strength of the cement between. For small sizes, the space on
the outside of the joint, even in single rings, is large, and it is often
required that pieces of slate or brick be used to chink in these
openings. English engineers have required the use of specially
molded brick shaped to the proper radius of the sewer, but in
this country this refinement has not been considered necessary.
In order to distribute the pressure in the arch ring evenly, through
the different rings of brick, some better bond than that due to the
adhesion of the cement ought to be provided. This can be done
by laying a course of brick as headers through the arch at such
intervals as the radius allows, one more brick in the outer ring
than in the inner one. In a 3 -foot sewer this is possible every
three courses, as shown by Fig. 33, originally drawn to full scale.
In large sewers, the change in length of the inner and outer cir-
cumference takes place more gradually, and the opportunity for
inserting headers comes less frequently. A block voussoir may
be built through the arch at regular intervals, and the brick of the
different courses cut to fit between the several voussoirs. These
voussoirs may be of cut stone or of brick built up in the form of
voussoirs or headers, the former practice being the better. The
question of bond should be thoroughly worked out on paper, the
drawing being of large scale, so that the bond may be specifically
BRICK SEWERS
49
Fig- 33
Fig. 34
50 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
detailed and instructions given to the masons before the work is
begun.
A cheap and useful reinforcement is afforded by the use of
strap iron laid about two feet apart around the sewer between
the rings, with one end turned up between the brick of the outer
course, and the other end turned down between the brick of the
next inner one. (See Fig. 34.)
The mortar for brick sewers is commonly made of Portland
cement mixed 1:3, the plaster coats being i : i. Cement mortar,
especially when wet, works with difficulty under the trowel. The
brick absorb the moisture, and the mortar seems to have no adhe-
sion to the brick. If the mortar is made very wet, the brick slide
out of place, and it is difficult to keep the walls to line and grade.
A small amount of slaked lime not only increases the density of
the mortar, but causes the mortar to work more easily. Probably
10 per cent of lime, based on the weight of the cement, would have
no bad effects on the strength of the mortar, but would improve it,
both in strength and density. Experienced bricklayers become
very expert at laying sewer brick, and instead of 1000 or 1500
brick, which is a fair day's work on a house wall, a good man will
lay from 2500 to 4000 brick a day in a large sewer. The mortar
is mixed thin, and the brick dropped into place much as the brick
in a street pavement are placed. The author has seen a laborer
detailed to place the mortar by the shovelful, while the mason
handled the brick only, making the joint by the dexterous shove
he gave the brick as it was put into place. Work is well done by
this method, and joints are well filled, and the* surface is left
smooth, the only requirement being a form, or cradle, in which to
place the brick.
The actual construction of a brick sewer involves little that is
unusual. The first step is the placing of the row of brick which
is to form the invert. In good soil this is laid on a bed of mor-
tar placed directly on the ground. Then next to this row, on
each side consecutively, the adjoining rows are placed, tamping
dirt underneath to bring the top edge to line. If it is a two-ring
sewer, the second ring follows three or four courses behind the
BRICK SEWERS 51
first, both stopping at the horizontal diameter, where the two
courses are brought to a plane and leveled up. This lower part
is allowed to set two or three days, when the arch centering is placed
and the brickwork of the arch is built up. If the ground is soft,
a concrete base must be placed first, on which the brick may be
supported. Or a timber cradle can be built, the ribs of 2-inch
lumber spaced about 4 feet, and 2-inch lagging nailed to the
inside, so that it has the form of the outside of the brickwork.
These cradles are best made in place, and carefully held to grade
while gravel is tamped under and around them. The brick is
then laid against these forms. The arch forms are made in
lengths of from 8 to 16 feet, so designed that they can be readily
lowered from their position against the arch, taken out, and used
again. Some examples of arch forms are shown under concrete.
CHAPTER IV.
CONCRETE SEWERS.
THE use of concrete in sewer construction is growing con-
stantly, both in connection with brickwork, either for backing
or as an integral part of the sewer ring, and also separately in
cases where brick or pipe is not easily available. For build-
ing small sewers the Chenoweth process is convenient, allowing,
as it does, a continuous mixing and placing of the concrete with-
out stopping to make or move the necessary forms. This
process was used in 1894 for building 900 feet of 24-inch pipe
and a mile of lo-inch pipe at Scarborough-on-the-Hud-
son.1 The concrete was composed of 5 parts broken stone,
2 parts sand, and i part cement, and was reported to have cost
for the larger size, 95 cents, and for the smaller, 30 cents, per
foot, for the conduit alone in place, as compared with 97 cents
and 23 cents for the corresponding sizes of vitrified tile. The
process, invented by Mr. Alexander Chenoweth, of New York
City, is described as follows: A collapsible mandrel, held apart
by wedges, is placed on grade, and a thin galvanized ribbon is
wound spirally around the mandrel. The concrete is tamped
around the mandrel to the proper thickness. The mandrels
are then loosened and drawn forward, while the ribbon is
left in place supporting the green concrete. A new piece of
ribbon is attached to that in place, and wound around the man-
drels. The trench is filled with the ribbon of steel in place, and
the ribbon is not moved for about 10 days, when it is with-
drawn from the rear through a manhole. The inventor claims
that a length of several hundred feet of pipe can be freed
1 Eng. News, Vol. 26, p. 369; Vol. 31, p. 81; Vol. 33, p. 223; Vol. 51,
p. 164.
52
CONCRETE SEWERS 53
from the ribbon in this way. An experimental piece of sewer
built after this patent in 1891 at High Bridge *, is still in good
condition.
Another invention for making concrete pipe continuously is
that of Mr. W. L. Ransome, of Chicago, which has the advan-
tage that all the concrete, even that of the invert, can be tamped
in place. The essential part of the invention is the mold,
which is cylindrical but cut off obliquely at the front.2 When
placed in position in the trench, which is trimmed properly to
grade, the prow of the mold is located at the beginning of the
sewer. A cover box or outside mold is laid on the trench
bottom at such a depth below the core mold as will give the
proper thickness to the pipe. The cover box, drawn ahead,
slowly smooths, and by its weight compresses the earth bottom.
The core mold following, with its long, oblique prow, gives the
thickness to the concrete, which is tamped from the front end.
A cover mold, also cut off obliquely, gives the thickness to the
top of the pipe. The three molds are drawn ahead at a rate
corresponding to the rate of placing the concrete, and the green
concrete is found to be self-sustaining in the smaller sizes of pipe.
When the pipe is larger than 24-inch diameter a modification
has to be made. The top part of the core mold is made with
a projecting horn, on which are strung half-rings of iron. These
rings, supported by small iron struts, are left behind at intervals
as the mold moves ahead. The struts are placed vertically and
horizontally by a boy who stays inside for this purpose.
This form of mold has been used at Oakland, Cal., where
400 feet of cable conduit were laid per day, and at Denver,
Col., where it was employed for making 7000 feet of 38-inch
water pipe. In this latter city, with a gang of 30 men, perform-
ing all their various duties systematically, the machine was
capable of making about 600 feet of pipe daily, although on
account of stoppages and delays the average daily rate did not
exceed 300 feet. The proportions used were three and three
1 Eng. News, Vol. 26, p. 369.
2 Eng. Rec., Vol. 53, p. 349.
54 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
and one-half parts of river gravel to one part of cement. The
cost of the pipe was $1.35 to $1.50 per foot, with cement at
$3.75 per barrel, gravel $1.25 per yard, and wages $1.75 to $2.00
per day. The cost of the same size vitrified pipe, if it could be
bought, would be about $3.00 per foot in place.
There has been some attempt in the past to make and use
cement pipe in the same way that sewer pipe are made, viz.,
singly in molds, afterwards to be jointed together in the trench.
Brooklyn for many years had the distinction of being the one
city which demanded cement pipe for all its sewer extensions.
Washington, D.C., uses cement in the form of concrete largely,
making the pipe in place, and generally of larger sizes than
vitrified pipe are made.
There has been a prevalent opinion that a cement pipe was
likely to be more porous and more brittle than vitrified pipe,
and therefore to be shunned. Of late years, however, several
cement sewer pipe machines have been devised and put on the
market, which will probably result in the increasing use of
cement pipe. Formerly, the high price of cement prevented
competition with clay pipe, but in the past few years this does
not hold. There seems to be no reason why well-constructed
cement sewer pipe should not last as long as vitrified pipe,
unless, indeed, subjected to acids which attack the concrete
matrix. There are good and bad grades of cement pipe,
and the pipe must be properly made and used, or the results
will prove unsatisfactory. The possibility of weak and porous
spots in cement or concrete pipe is probably the greatest fault.
One shovelful of gravel deficient in or poorly mixed with cement
makes a defect in the pipe line which cannot be remedied.
Where the cement layer is as thin as it must be in a cement pipe
to compare with a vitrified clay pipe, the danger is, of course,
greater than with concrete in thicker layers. Not for a moment
even must the vigilance of the inspector or the faithfulness of
the workmen be relaxed if good pipe are to be obtained. Even
under these conditions, some imperfections are likely to be
found in the pipe.
CONCRETE SEWERS 55
During 1904, the United States Geological Survey 1 conducted
a series of experiments on concrete pipe, reinforced with steel
rods. Seven pipes were made, each 5 feet in diameter, 20 feet
long, the concrete being 6 inches thick in all pipes. The tests
were made with the hope that the pipes would show themselves
capable of withstanding an interior pressure of at least 100 feet
without excessive leakage. The materials were carefully mixed
and placed, and every precaution taken to secure good pipes.
The results of testing the first two pipes were such that the engi-
neer in charge concluded that it was practically impossible to
make a concrete pipe non-porous without some water-proof
plaster on the inside. Without the plaster, the pipes, though six
inches thick, leaked so much that it was not possible to get any
pressure in them. The water leaked away faster than the
pumps could supply it. He found the greatest leakage where
tamping seams occurred, places where different batches of con-
crete met, and where the tamping was not sufficient for thorough
incorporation. He found it difficult to get water-tight joints with
short lengths, and insists that concrete pipe must have imperfec-
tions, many of which cannot be easily avoided. Altogether the
experiments were not favorable to concrete or cement pipe, prov-
ing without question the supreme importance of eternal vigilance,
and, even with it, the impossibility of obtaining pipe good enough
to withstand any internal pressure without good plaster coating
on the inside.
Cement pipes are made by tamping a dry mixture of sand and
cement, either i : 3 or i : 4, into a vertical mold. The molds
can be removed at once and are ready for a second pipe. Three
men can mold and set aside about 4 twenty-four inch pipes and
9 twelve-inch pipes per hour.
The following table shows the thickness of cement pipe as made
by the Miracle Company, with their estimate of quantities and
cost.2
These figures were computed for a i : 3 mixture, the pipe made
1 Water Supply Papers, No. 143.
2 Catalogue Cement Machinery Manufacturing Company, Columbus, Ohio.
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
in two-foot lengths, the sand costing 75 cents per cubic yard,
and the cement $2.00 per barrel. Twenty-four-inch pipe in three-
foot lengths, made by the author for testing purposes, a few at a
time, cost at the rate of about 50 cents per foot.
Size.
Thickness.
Cubic Feet of
Sand per Pipe.
Cost of Labor.
Total Cost
per Foot.
Inches.
Inches.
Feet.
Dollars.
Dollars.
6
o 324
o 08
o oco
8
O 4?2
o 08
o 06?
10
o 8to
O IO
O II?
12
I .100
O .10
°-I55
15
I .400
O.II
o .192
18
j
1 .840
0.13
0.237
20
1.950
0.13
°-255
24
2
2.750
o-i5
°-343
3°
a*
3.700
0.17
0-443
36
3
4.900
o .20
0-575
At Coldwater, Mich.,1 in the summer of 1901, use was made
of molded blocks for the construction of the arch of a 3J-foot
circular sewer. The invert up to the horizontal diameter was of
gravel concrete, the roughly shaped trench bottom serving as the
outside form. The blocks were molded in advance of field con-
struction, each block being solid, 24 inches long along the line of
the sewer, 5! inches on the intrados, 8 inches on the extrados, and
8 inches through, or thick. The gravel cost but little, the molds
were of wood lined with tin, and the cement cost $1.35 per barrel.
The blocks cost about 12 cents each under those conditions, or at
the rate of about $4.20 per cubic yard for the concrete in the form
of blocks. This is, of course, a low price for concrete in such
small forms, and it is possible that under other conditions the use
of brick might be cheaper. The only advantage of the blocks
over the concrete placed in mass in the arch is that the forms can
be made somewhat cheaper, and can be moved ahead as soon as
the key block is placed. Otherwise, this method has no advan-
tage over other methods.
The greatest use of concrete in sewer construction, however,
is not in the form of molded pipe, nor yet of blocks, both made
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 48, p. 101.
CONCRETE SEWERS 57
in a factory and brought on to the work, but is in its use at the
site of the work. For convenience in description its use there
may be divided into three classes:
(1) Used alone in monolithic construction.
(2 ) Used in connection with brickwork.
(3 ) Used in connection with steel.
The following examples may be cited of sewers built of con-
crete alone.
Fig. 35 shows concrete sections used at Washington, B.C.,
for 12 and 24-inch pipes. The inside lining is a if -inch plaster
coat, depended on to make the sewer impervious.
A monolithic concrete storm sewer was built in 1900 by the
Chicago Transfer and Clearing Company1 to carry off storm
water from their extensive railroad yards. (See Fig. 36.) The
mixture was in the ratio of 92 cubic yards stone, 51.5 cubic yards
sand, and 18 cubic yards cement. The bottom of the trench
was trimmed to the outside of the sewer ring. The invert con-
crete was then put in and tamped and carried up on the sides
without outside forms until the invert had an angle of about 140
degrees. Then arch forms were put in, the lagging being 3 X
2-inch stuff, edges chamfered. The lagging was loose and
merely laid in place. Where necessary, planks were used to set
out the side of the trench and keep the side concrete of the speci-
fied thickness. No outside forms were used on the arch. The
centers were easily removed by swinging about their vertical
diameter. A plaster coat of i : 3 was used to smooth up the
inside and to insure imperviousness. The 9o-inch and 84-inch
mains had a uniform thickness of wall of 12 inches; the 48-
inch main, a ring 10 inches thick; and the 42 and 36-inch mains,
rings 8 inches thick. The excavation was mostly in blue clay.
A solid concrete sewer 3 feet 6 inches X 2 feet 4 inches was
built in New York City along the subway between Fifty-fourth
and Fifty-eighth Streets.2 (See Fig. 37.) For this sewer, the
1 Assn. Engrs. Cornell University, Vol. 10, p. 47.
2 Eng. News, Vol. 47, p. 201.
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
CONCRETE SEWERS
59
concrete was placed in the bottom of the trench until its top
surface was within one-fourth inch of flow line grade. An inside
form was then set and planks used to form the outside of the
Fig. 36
spandrel. The invert concrete was 1:2:4, the stone being broken
to pass through a i-inch ring. After the invert was set and the
form withdrawn, a thin wash of cement was given the inside to
perfect the smooth interior. The arch forms were then placed,
and filling was held in place by battered side boards braced
against the sides of the trench. It was reported that these sewers
cost one-third less than brick sewers of the same dimensions,
and that no variation from the true grade was found to be as
much as .01 foot.
Fig. 38 shows the cross-sections of the concrete sewers used
as mains in Victoria, B.C., as designed by Mr. Edward Mohun.1
The concrete was made in the proportion of 2j shingle,
1 Can. Soc., Vol. 10, p. 80.
Fig. 37
m
/If
* .
Fig. 38
CONCRETE SEWERS
6l
2§ sand, and i cement, the shingle and sand being both taken
directly from the sea beach. The trenching was largely in sand,
and planks were placed inside the trenches to form the outside
of the concrete walls. The channel pipe was laid to grade and
the concrete tamped in tight. Forms for the inner surface
were then set, the invert part first, and when the concrete
was set and that part moved ahead, the arch form was
placed and the concrete filled in. It was stated that the addi-
tional cost of the concrete in this method was more than saved
by the use of unskilled labor in moving and preparing the out-
side forms, the lumber being removed and used over and over.
14-2 Bricks
Fig. 39
A storm- water sewer was constructed in Truro in 1902,* which
possesses some noteworthy features, the engineers being Lea &
Coffin, of Montreal and Boston. (See Fig. 39.)
The concrete used consisted of i part cement, 2| parts sand,
and 4^ parts gravel, passing a 2-inch screen and caught on a
sand screen. The determination of the proportions was such
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 46, p. 196.
62
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Fig. 40
Fig. 41
CONCRETE SEWERS 63
as to give a slight excess of sand and cement in the voids of the
gravel. The centering was of i-inch planed and matched
pine, nailed to ribs of 2-inch planking spaced 2 feet apart.
Along the top on each side of the centering were placed two
2 X 4-inch hard wood "stringers, between which at every second
rib was a 2 X 3 -inch removable hardwood brace. The centering
was made in 10 and 1 2-foot lengths, and in halves hooked
together at the bottom and held in place at the top, while in
use, by the hardwood braces (shown in Fig. 40). The concrete
was laid to grade in the bottom. The forms were then set, and
planks laid on edge along each side of the trench as a mold
for the outside of the concrete, held in place by iron pins
driven into the ground. The arch, of about 124 degrees, was of
brick laid on light forms.
A 20 X 30-inch concrete sewer, shown in Fig. 41, was built in
Swampscott, Mass., in 1903, partly in tunnel and partly in soft
ground.1 The concrete was 1:2:4 gravel. The foundation
concrete was first laid, then the invert was built, its outside being
braced against the sides and bottom of the tunnel or sheeting.
The concrete backing was then put in place and the arch of the
sewer put in. The lagging of i-inch boards was covered with
zinc for smoothness, the sections being 10 feet long. After the
concrete had fully set in the tunnel work, the space was filled
with gravel.
The following additional typical cross-sections are given (see
Fig. 42 and Fig. 43), taken from the catalogue of the Blaw Col-
lapsible Steel Centering Company, of Pittsburg, the thickness in
each case being that recommended by William B. Fuller, City
Engineer of Newport City, for average practice in both hard and
soft material. The same engineer gives the following directions
for determining the proper proportions of concrete, a method
which is so definite and direct, and at the same time so convinc-
ing, that it deserves the widest circulation.
On important work, where the greatest strength and water-tightness are desired
from the given cement, sand and stone, the right proportions should be obtained
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 47, p. 550.
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Sheet
vPiles
Jl + C CHin.3)
Gravel
Sheet
Fig. 42
CONCRETE SEWERS
66 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
by trial as follows: Procure a hollow cylinder, such as a piece of 12-inch pipe,
and an accurate set of weighing scales. Weigh out the proportions you think
right of cement, sand and stone, and mix thoroughly with water on an impervious
platform, such as a sheet of iron; then put all the concrete in the pipe, stood on
end, tamping it thoroughly, and measure the depth of the concrete in the pipe.
Now throw this concrete away and clean the pipe and make up another batch,
with the total weight of cement, sand and stone the same as before, but with the
proportions of the sand to the stone slightly different. Measure the depth as
before, and if the depth is less, and the concrete still looks nice and works well,
this is a better mixture than the first. Continue trying in this way until you get
the least depth in the pipe.
This simply shows to you that you are getting the same amount of material
into a smaller space, and that consequently the material is more dense, and, as
has been proved by many experiments, is both the strongest and most water-
tight material possible to obtaia from the kind of sand and stone, and the propor-
tion of cement used in the experiments.
A little trouble taken in this way will often be productive of very important
results. I have known concrete to be increased in strength fully 200 per cent by
simply changing the proportions of the sand to the stone, and not changing the
amount of cement used in the least.
CHAPTER V.
CONCRETE AND BRICK SEWERS.
THE use of concrete in connection with brick marks a transition
stage between the use of brick alone and the use of concrete alone.
It allows the use of the cheaper material, concrete, in the bottom
where the inequalities of the trench require adjusting, and assigns
the brickwork to the arch, where such work may be done more
Fig. 44
easily and expeditiously. The fact that the invert is sometimes
lined with brick goes to show that the designing engineer is still
afraid of the new material, as to its ability both to withstand
erosion and to present a smooth surface, a fear entirely unfounded.
Since concrete is intrinsically cheaper than brick, and has
67
68
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
besides the other economic advantages named, it seems almost
puerile to hesitate about its use throughout, and probably the
use of brick and concrete together will rapidly decrease.
The following examples of the use of concrete and brick may
be cited:
Fig. 44 shows a combination brick and concrete sewer as
Fig. 45
built in Medford, Mass., in 1903, and Fig. 45 shows the forms
used in construction. The material for the invert was concrete
1:3:6 bank gravel, and the arch was built of one ring of hard-
burned brick. The forms used involved some peculiar features.
They were so designed that the invert template, instead of stopping
at the springing line of the arch, extended up to planes at 30
CONCRETE AND BRICK SEWERS
69
degrees with the horizontal. This was done to save brickwork
of which the arch was built, but it resulted in the use of
unusually simplified forms. These were in two parts, invert
form and arch form, both 10 feet long. The invert forms were
made in halves, but were firmly held together by means of
malleable iron clamps, which fitted over the stringers on the inside.
The tops were held firmly and at the proper distance apart by
iron rods, with turn-buckles which allowed the forms to be most
carefully separated from the concrete. The arch forms were
made of 2-inch ribs, spaced 2 feet apart and covered with J-inch
lagging. This form was held in place at the rear by heavy wedges
on the bottom of the form behind, and the front end was held up
by a screw jack from the invert. These centers proved entirely
satisfactory, were readily set up and removed, and were handled
without the least injury to the comparatively fresh concrete.
Concrete
Fig. 46 and Fig. 47 show additional sections of sewers where
combinations of concrete and brick have been used. Fig. 46
shows a 24-inch sewer in soft ground, the concrete resting on a
timber platform and filling the entire space between sheeting
boards. The arch of one row of brick starts on a row of
70 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
headers which mark its springing line. The concrete is 12
inches thick on the sides and 6 inches thick on the bottom of the
sewers.
0^4607
Cement Mortor
^_ --75-- "»j
Fig. 47
Fig. 47 shows a 64-inch sewer in firm ground. The concrete
is brought up higher than in Fig. 39, the concrete is 12 inches
thick on both bottom and sides, and fills the trench which has
been carefully trimmed out to grade.
At Altoona, Pa.,1 a combination brick and concrete sewer
33} X 44-inch oval was built, one ring of vitrified shale
paving brick being surrounded by from 4 to 8 inches of con-
crete. Many engineers believe that paving brick resist wear
and erosion better than concrete, and hence prefer the section
shown to one all concrete, the combination being cheaper than
two-ring brick. (See Fig. 48. )
The rich plaster coat on the outside of the brick is of advantage
as tending to make the walls of the sewer less pervious.
Fig. 49 shows the outfall sewer, 15! miles long, at Mel-
bourne, Australia. This is a circular sewer built of concrete
1 Proc. Engineers' Club of Philadelphia, Vol. 14, p. 92.
CONCRETE AND BRICK SEWERS
and brick as shown. A wooden platform is built in the
bottom of the trench, and the concrete invert laid, with a
I
Stringer 12\ 4 "
V Stringer 12 'x 4'
12 "x 3"Planking
13 '0*
Fig. 49
plaster coat under the brick lining. The arch is a three-ring
brick arch, backed with concrete at the haunches. The
72 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
shaped section, shown in Fig. 50, was also used as a portion of
the main sewer.1
Fig. 50
Fig. 51 shows a section of a large storm-water outfall 12 to 14
feet wide by 8 feet high. The arch is 13 inches thick, backed
with additional rings of brickwork at the haunches. The con-
crete is 8 inches thick at the bottom and 24 inches thick on the
sides.
Fig. 52 shows a combined brick and concrete sewer built in
lagging in very wet sandy soil. The invert was first laid between
the 2-inch sheeting driven obliquely to shut off the flow of sand.
The brickwork was then carried up, the concrete backing being
placed between the brickwork and the lagging as the former
advanced.
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 44, p. 587.
CONCRETE AND BRICK SEWERS
73
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^s^ o—
Fig. 51
Portland
Concrete
2 Plank
Tongued and
Grooved
Sand
Sand
Very-Wet
74
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Fig. 53 shows a section of the basket-handled arch adopted
for the aqueduct from the Wachusett Dam on the Nashua River,
to the Sudbury River. The aqueduct, about 9 miles long, is n
feet 6 inches wide by 10 feet 5 inches high, and has a slope of i
Fig. 53
in 2500, and an estimated capacity of 300,000,000 gallons per
day. The arch has three rows of brick, cut down to one where
the concrete backing is added. The entire masonry is 3 feet
thick at the springing line and about 6 feet thick at the base.
This backing was, however, reduced in tunnel and in rock cuts.
CHAPTER VI.
REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWERS.
THE tendency of construction is towards the use of reinforced
concrete for all large sewers. It has many advantages; and
the great disadvantage, the porosity, has not been emphasized
sufficiently to act as a drawback. The saving of expense is
very great, since the additional cost of steel does not equal the
cost of the concrete saved, except for small sewers, i.e. up to
3 feet diameter. For these smaller sizes it is cheaper to increase
the amount of concrete slightly and omit the reinforcement.
The steel is supplied in two forms, either as a wire mesh
wrapped around the pipe and buried in concrete, the size of
mesh being from 3 to 6 inches, or as rods placed around the
pipe at intervals of about 12 inches with longitudinal rods
spaced twice that distance. The amount of metal needed,
empirical entirely, is about the same in the two cases, and the
more intimate association of the steel and concrete afforded by
the mesh gives that form of reinforcement a decided advantage.
As a guide to the amount of steel used, the table on the following
page, taken from the catalogue of the Jackson Reinforced Pipe
Company, is given, there being two circular bands in each two
feet, and five longitudinal rods in the circumference.
The following examples of actual construction are given,
where expanded metal has been used.
Fig. 54 shows a cross-section of the reinforced concrete
aqueduct which was built in 1906 to supply the City of Mexico
with water. This aqueduct is about 1 7 miles long, and is laid on
a grade of 3 feet in 10,000, its capacity being estimated at
about 60 cubic feet per second. The rock used was a hard
basalt, mixed in the proportion of 1:3:3, fine screenings being
75
76
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
used in place of sand. The maximum width is 6 feet 8 inches,
and the maximum height is 8 feet 5 inches. The thickness of
the crown is 7 inches and of the base 12 inches, the haunches
being thickened as shown. One layer of expanded metal was
used by way of reinforcement, and was located in the section as
shown in the drawing.
Fig. 54
A concrete sewer in Providence shown in Fig. 55 is reinforced
with expanded metal. The sewer is 36, 48, and 56-inch diameter,
and for the smaller size is but 4 inches thick at the crown.
The expanded metal is No. 14 gauge, 4-inch mesh. A piece
of the metal 18 inches wide is embedded in the invert, and then
the arch form placed. The arch reinforcement is then placed so
as to lap the invert metal about 6 inches. The concrete was
made of i cement to 9 bank gravel. A portion of the invert,
where the scour is greatest, is finished with a rich mixture and
troweled down like a sidewalk.
During the year 1903 a reinforced concrete sewer was built in
the city of Wilmington, the entire length being 7436 feet.
REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWERS
77
Of this, 1726 feet was 9 feet 3 inches in diameter, 2426 feet,
6 feet 6 inches in diameter, 1374 feet, 6 feet in diameter, 804
feet, 5 feet in diameter, and 64 feet, 4 feet 9 inches in diameter.
Fig- 55
The accompanying drawings, Fig. 56, show the cross-sections
of the different sizes. The engineer, Mr. Hatton, calls atten-
tion to the thin crown, only 8 inches for 9 feet 3 inches diameter,
and to the fact that it proved strong enough to withstand the
shock resulting from dumping a cubic yard of dirt and rock
from the cable buckets from heights of from 3 to 10 feet, and
the weight of 25 feet of loose filling, without any apparent
fracture. In construction, both inner and outer forms, and
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Fig. 56
Fig. 57
REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWERS 79
lagging, were used, the latter being movable and placed
consecutively from the invert up, as the concrete was deposited.
The concrete consisted of ij-inch stones mixed with stone dust
and cement in proportion of i cement, 2 dust, and 6 stone.
The reinforcements for the largest size consisted of expanded
steel 6 inches No. 6 gauge, lapped i inch. The other sizes were
reinforced with a woven-wire fabric, mesh 6 inches X 4 inches,
the wire being No. 8 gauge.
The Paxton Creek intercepting sewer at Harrisburg, Pa.,1 was
built in 1903 to take the sewage out of Paxton Creek and at the
same time carry creek water enough to give a self-cleaning
velocity on the necessarily small grade. The invert of this sewer
is a short arc of a circle with tangents on each side which have an
inclination of 3 to i as shown in Fig. 57. The larger section,
shown in the figure, is 5 feet high by 6 feet wide, the arch
being a parabola to the invert. The reinforcement is 3-inch
No. 10 gauge expanded metal. The concrete was 1:2^: 4^,
and the invert was finished to the lines of templates set
12 feet apart. The arch centers were 2j X z\ X J-inch steel
angle bent to proper shape, spaced 3 feet 4 inches apart,
the lagging being 2-inch pine plank 10 feet long. The thin
arch was subjected to a severe test when a coal train was derailed
on to the ground directly over the trench with only about 5 feet of
filling, but no damage resulted.
The following examples are given to show the construction
where longitudinal and transverse rods have been used.
Fig. 58 shows a section of reinforced concrete conduit used
by the Jersey City Water Supply Company.2 The construction
was of Portland cement concrete, reinforced with Ransome steel
rods. The thickness of the sections, the size of the rods and
their spacing, were modified according to the character of the
soil and the depth of the cutting. Ninety per cent of the
conduit, however, had the arch 5 inches thick, the haunches n
inches thick, and the base 6 inches thick. The reinforcement
consisted of cold twisted f-inch square steel rods bent to the
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 50, p. 444. 2 Eng. Rec., Vol. 49> P- 73-
8o
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
form shown in the drawings, spaced i foot apart, and of J-inch
longitudinal rods spaced 2 feet apart and wired to the transverse
rods. The transverse rods were made of such lengths as to
extend i foot below the bottom of the outside forms, below
which the concrete was built against the hard earth or rock sides
of the trench.
TABLE OF SIZES AND REINFORCEMENT.
Size of Pipe.
Thickness of Wall.
Size of Rods.
Size of Bands.
Inches.
24
Inches.
Inches.
IX J
Inches.
27
3
X 5
^j
X i
3°
3z
xl
;X I
36
4
xl
;X I
42
4i
X'
iXl
48
5
X:
X i
g
Si
6
X:
X
1
^Xi:
:X 2
66
6*
X
;X2
72
7
X
No. 10X2;
78
7
X
' No. 10X2:
84
7i
«
X \
No. 10X2.
9°
8
•
X:
No. 10X2;
96
»i
Xi
No. 10X3
Fig. 59 shows the cross-section of a large reinforced concrete
sewer built (1907) in the borough of Queens, New York City.
This sewer, nearly two miles long, varies in size from 2\ to 15
feet in diameter. The drawing shows the lo-foot section,
larger sizes having a double reinforcement, one row at the
extrados and one row at the intrados. In the section shown the
transverse rods are ij-inch Johnson corrugated bars spaced 12
inches center to center. The longitudinal bars are f-inch and
are spaced 18 inches center to center. The thickness of the
crown in the section shown is 12 inches, of the springing line
24 inches, and of the base 15 inches, the minimum thickness of
crown for the smallest size being 6 inches.
Fig. 60 shows a storm-water sewer, 7 feet in diameter, built in
Des Moines, Iowa, in 1906, and known as the Ingersoll Run Sewer.
In construction the trench was dug to the form of the outside of
the invert, and transverse J-inch steel bars were then placed i foot
REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWERS
81
Fig. 58
Fig. 59
82 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
apart. The template was then placed in position, and the con-
crete, a i : 2 : 4 mixture, was placed between the trench and the
template. The invert being completed, the top template was
placed upon the lower one, and the steel bars were bent over this
and wired together. Longitudinal bars, \ inch square, were laid
in the concrete as it was built up.
Fig. 6 1 shows the cross-section of the Harlem Creek sewer in
St. Louis, now (1908) under construction. The width at the
point where it empties into the Mississippi River is 29 feet and
its center height is 19 feet, making it probably the largest con-
crete sewer in this country. The thickness of the arch is 14
inches at the center and 26 inches at the springing line. The
invert in earth is 16 inches thick at the center with a lining of
one row of vitrified brick. The transverse rods are in double
rows, spaced 10 inches apart and J-inch Johnson corrugated
bars used. The longitudinal rods are also in double rows,
about 3 feet apart, and are J-inch bars.
A reinforced concrete sewer of unusual section and strength
was built in McKean Street, Philadelphia,1 in 1901. As shown
in Fig. 62, the bottom concrete, supported on piles, was very thick,
and was heavily reinforced with steel bars in both directions, while
the roof was a combination beam and slab construction. The con-
crete in the bottom and sides was 1:3:6, the stone screened to
exclude pieces of more than i J inch, and less than J inch. The roof
was mixed 1:2:5, an<^ tne granolithic coating was i : i. The
reinforcement in the bottom consisted of four longitudinal f -inch
rods, one directly over each pile, with transverse J-inch rods,
spaced 12 inches apart. The side reinforcement consisted of
vertical f-inch rods, spaced 12 inches apart. The roof of the
sewer was made up of concrete beams 2 feet apart, spanned with
slabs of concrete 5 inches thick. The beams have one ij-inch
rod in the bottom, and are 13 inches deep by 2\ inches wide.
This is unusually heavy construction, justified by the poor founda-
tion, and by the heavy loading on the surface just above the
sewer.
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 45, p. 342.
REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWERS
L,J. > L
Fig. 60
Fig. 61
84
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
b)
£
REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWERS 85
Fig. 63 shows the forms and section used in a storm-water
sewer at South Bend, Ind.,1 built during the year 1906. This
sewer was from 66 to 81 inches in diameter, the average
depth of trench being about 18 feet. The arch of the sewer
barrel is reinforced with -j3^ X i-inch steel bands placed trans-
versely 12 inches apart on centers. These bands extend by
means of a pin connection and short anchor pieces into the con-
crete of the abutment. The bottom of the trench was shaped
as nearly as possible to the grade and form of the outside
of the sewer. Braces, 3 feet apart, were cut and nailed on to the
rangers across the trench. A vertical form shown in Fig. (a) was
then set up in 1 2-foot lengths, and fastened to stakes which were
driven, one on each side at each brace to further hold the forms
in exact position. A template for the invert of the barrel was sus-
pended from the cross-braces and fastened as shown by the
diagonals. Concrete was then tamped in between the bottom of
the trench and the invert form, and between the two vertical side
forms, the concrete being left horizontal as shown in Fig. (b).
The side pieces of the reinforcement bands were then set in place,
and firmly held at points A, Fig. (b). Then two additional sec-
tions were placed, one on each side, and extending from the inside
template up to the springing line of the arch. These pieces were
held in place by a cross-brace nailed to the ribs on each side, and
by a notched brace which fitted into the lower ends of the ribs.
The concrete was then filled in between this template and the verti-
cal form until it reached the springing line, all as shown in Fig. (c).
The two sections of the arch form were then put in place, the other
pieces of reinforcement fastened on, and the forms on each side
to hold the extrados were set. The concrete for the arch was then
deposited. Two features of these forms are noteworthy; namely,
the number of sections into which the forms are divided, conducive
to easy handling and rapid work, and also the light sections of the
forms. The lagging is all f-inch; the ribs are 4 inches deep, cut
from 2-inch lumber, and are spaced 3 feet apart. Concrete in the
invert and in the bench walls of the arch is mixed in the propor-
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 53, p. 736.
86
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Fig. 63
REINFORCED CONCRETE SEWERS
Fig. 630
Fig. 64
88 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
tion of i part of cement, 3 parts sand, and 6 parts gravel, the
invert coated with J inch of i to i cement mortar. The arch
concrete is made of i part cement, 2 parts sand, and 4 parts
gravel.
The main intercepting sewer of Cleveland, extending along the
lake front for a distance of 3! miles, is built of reinforced con-
crete, under the Parmlee patent.1 Figure 64 shows the section
used, having 2 X J-inch steel bars as reinforcement 15 inches
apart, with i| X J-inch longitudinal bars. The feature of the
design and of the patent is the method of inserting anchor bars
in the invert which are bolted to the tension bars of the arch so
that the form for the arch can be put in place without difficulty.
The concrete for the arch was 1:3: 7J with i J-inch screened
broken stone, but where the voids in the stone exceeded 40 per
cent it was made 1:3:6.
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 48, p. 247.
CHAPTER VII.
MANHOLES.
MANHOLES, as the name would imply, are built to allow access
to the sewer for the purposes of inspection or cleaning. For
this reason they must be built large enough to admit cleaning
tools into the sewer; they must be near enough together to
admit of an examination of the intermediate pipe; and they
must not introduce any element of weakness in the sewer line,
either in the matter of settlement or the admission of ground
water. Their construction, for purposes of description and
estimation of cost, may be divided into three parts, — the bot-
tom, the side walls, and the cover. The cover of cast iron is
often, in contracts, separated from the rest of the manhole work
and bought at a fixed price per pound. The equity of this is
evident when it is noted that the cost of the cover is constant
for all manholes, while the cost of the side walls varies with the
depth. Manholes are usually located over the axis of the sewer
line, but with large sewers they may be eccentric, and occasion-
ally they may be built entirely separate and connected into the
side of the sewer by a horizontal tunnel or by a descending
stairway. On pipe sewers their location is governed by the
requirements of alignment and of grade. It is generally agreed
that the pipe should run in a straight line from manhole to man-
hole (both vertically and horizontally), and that all connecting
curves should be entirely in manholes. The sewer line is,
therefore, plotted, on the street plan (in chords where the
streets are curved), and the manholes located at the angles.
The changes of grade are fixed, if possible, to take place at
these points; otherwise additional manholes must be located.
Manholes are always placed at the intersections of sewers, and
89
90 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
generally at street intersections. Finally, they should not be
more than 400 feet apart, although,- to save expense on trunk
lines with good grade, this distance is often increased to 600
feet. On brick sewers, large enough for a man to enter,' man-
holes are less frequent. The depth of the sewer affecting the
cost of the manholes should be a factor in determining their
frequency. One thousand feet may be fixed as the maximum
distance under the best conditions.
The cross-section of a manhole is generally bottle-shaped
(see Fig. 65), carried up vertically from the bottom for about
five feet, and then in the remaining distance contracted in a
reversed curve so that at the top it will be about 2 feet in diam-
eter. Generally the ends of the brick are kept horizontal,
although some engineers prefer to keep the ends normal to the
side lines, a method which the author believes to give the better
construction.
In very cold climates it is advisable to avoid vertical walls at
the top, and to bring the side walls up as the frustum of a cone.
At Brockville, Ont.,1 during a severe winter, the frost in its
expansion by holding the earth tightly against the cover cracked
the brickwork just below the cover in a manhole shaped like
Fig. 656, and the manholes were taken down and rebuilt as in
Fig. 650, in order to avoid future trouble of that sort.
In shallow trenches it is difficult to form any reversed curve,
and in such places the beds are kept perpendicular to the side
lines of the manholes, and the covers cast with the bottoms
inclined so that the covers will form a keystone of a vault.2 (See
Fig. 66.)
The bottom may be formed of either brick or concrete, and
consists of a channel for the flow of the sewage, with a platform
or floor on each side of this channel on which to stand. If the
manhole is located by the requirements of distance alone, allow-
ing access to a straight line of pipe, and there are no lateral
sewers entering, the most convenient channel is formed of a
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 27, p. 97.
2 Report on Sewerage of Santos, Brazil.
MANHOLES
bo
92 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
split pipe bedded in concrete, the smooth interior of the pipe
making a most desirable surface. (See Fig. 67.) In other cases
the channel must be formed of brick or shaped in concrete.
Fig. 66
Fig. 67
When of brick, the bottom is formed by laying the lowest course
through first on edge, the top of this course being lined in
between the ends of the pipe already in place. Other rows
MANHOLES
93
conforming to the curvature of the pipe are added on each side
up to the horizontal diameter. (See Fig. 68.) The bricks are
then laid up vertically as far as the top of the pipe. At this
level the floor is paved out horizontally far enough to make a
foundation for the side walls. When concrete is used, it is
Fig. 68
thrown in to a depth of about six inches under the invert grade
and then shaped to form the channel and the floor. Exact
forms may be used for this, but if the concrete is dry it may
readily be formed by hand into the shape required.
The size of the floor area varies, according to the size of the
pipes entering the manholes, the smallest size being that on a
94 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
straight line of 6-inch pipe. The limit is placed by the room
required for entering and working in the manhole, and this may
be fixed at an oval shape, 3 feet by 4 feet inside, the longer dimen-
sion being along the axis of the pipe. Manholes, where laterals
enter, require more room, and a circular plan, 4 feet in diameter,
may be fixed as the minimum. Rectangular sections, while more
symmetrical and capacious in appearance, have really additional
room only in the corners, where it is not useful, and since they
require more brick and are not as strong as the other forms, they
are little used. The choice between the circular and oval shape
must be made according to the special requirements of each man-
hole. As the sizes of sewers increase from a 6-inch sewer, the
size of the manholes must also be increased, a plan drawn to
scale of the pipes entering the manholes being a satisfactory way
of determining the proper size. For example, to determine the
proper size of a manhole to be built where a 24-inch sewer
turned at right angles, and at the same time was entered by a
i6-inch pipe, a sketch was made and the plans as shown adopted.
(See Fig. 69.) To secure good results in the flow, the con-
necting curves in the laterals and main should be of such
radius as to carry the flow line well into the main, allowing the
streams to mingle smoothly. Care should be taken that the
brickwork in the projecting tongue be not too sharp to be strongly
built. As small pieces of brick are easily dislodged, cut stone
may be used to advantage to give stability to the end of the
tongue.
The walls of a manhole are generally 9 inches thick, though
occasionally, where there is no frost and where the soil is firm,
4§-inch walls have been used. Where the manhole is deep, how-
ever, or where the soil is wet and unstable, 13 or ly-inch walls
should be used. The author had an experience of a 9-inch man-
hole wall broken entirely across just above the sewer and the
manhole itself moved laterally a few inches by unequal filling
around the manhole. Another experience was with a manhole
built on the edge of a stream, the manhole being 13 inches thick
to within $ feet of the top and 9 inches thick for that distance. A
MANHOLES
95
'\ <
Fig. 69
96 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
period of high water in the fall brought ice pressure to bear
against the manhole at the top, and the wall was broken just above
the point where the p-inch wall began.
In soft ground it may be necessary to provide artificial founda-
tion for the manhole, and care must be taken to have the manhole
bring the same unit loads on the ground as the pipe. For example,
a 24-inch pipe half full weighs about 700 pounds per running foot,
or has a pressure of 350 pounds per square foot on the soil. A
manhole 20 feet deep, 6 feet in diameter, weighs about 22,000
pounds, and if uniformly distributed over the bottom gives a
pressure of about 800 pounds per square foot, or more than double
the pipe load. In soft ground this would cause the manhole to
settle away from the pipe, breaking it off where it enters the man-
hole. This can be avoided only by increasing the area of the
manhole floor, either by a concrete steel foundation, or by a timber
platform. With a smaller pipe the difference is still greater,
and when the ground is soft special precautions must be taken
to equalize the pressure.
When a manhole is built into a sewer 3 feet or more in diameter,
no special foundation for the manhole is needed, but the side walls
start from the side walls of the sewer. The bonding of the lower
courses of the manhole into the brickwork of the sewer must be
carefully done, the mere setting of a manhole on top of the sewer
and a hole broken in the top of the sewer not being admissible
construction. Where the sewer is larger than 6 feet, the man-
hole has one side wall tangent to the sewer barrel, and the other
side ends on top of the sewer.1 (See Fig. 70.) For this con-
struction two rings of brick should be built in the sewer arch to
such a template that they will form the bottom of the manhole.
See Fig. 71 for drawing of such a construction as is here described.
A wooden cylinder may be set vertically at the right position pro-
jecting up through the arch, and the regular courses of brick
brought up against the rows of brick set around the cylinder.
A pattern could be made for the line of intersection of the two
cylinders, which would answer the same purpose.
1 Eng. News, Vol. 49, p. 8.
MANHOLES
97
Occasionally, engineers prefer to place the axis of the manhole
directly over the center line of the sewer, as shown in Fig. 72.*
The intersection in this case probably contributes less to the weak-
ness of the sewer arch, but the function of the manhole in giving
ready access to the sewer is much decreased in value. A portable
ladder is necessary to get to the invert, while with the side support
the steps are built in to the bottom.
5'0
CROSS SECTION
LONGITUDINAL SECTION
Fig. 70
Special forms of manholes are needed when the entering pipes
are on different levels, that is, when some special device is needed
to bring the sewage from the laterals into the main. The most
common method is to bring the sewage down through a vertical
1 Eng. News, Vol. 49, p. 8.
98
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
MANHOLES
99
pipe, and then through a go-degree bend into and in the direction
of the flow of the mainstream.1 (See Fig. 73.) This vertical pipe
may be brought down either on the inside or on the outside of the
Fig. 72
manhole, in both cases the horizontal pipe being prolonged by a
T through the manhole wall for inspection purposes. The advan-
tage of the first method, Fig. 73, is that the vertical pipe is secured
to the manhole and is supported by it so that the connection is
more stable. On the other hand, it occupies a large amount of
room in the manhole, requiring the latter to be built larger than
where no such construction exists. The advantage of the second
method, Fig. 74, is that no room in the manhole is usurped,2
1 Report on Sewerage of Santos, Brazil.
.2 Eng. News, Vol. 35, p. 338.
IOO
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
ELEVATION
Fig. 73
MANHOLES
IOI
but unless the bottom of the vertical pipe is well supported the
settlement of the pipe is different from that of the manhole, and
they break apart. In both cases
the invert of the bend should be
placed at the height of the average
surface in the main in order to pre-
vent deposits in the bend. Instead
of a vertical pipe, an inclined pipe
coming out of the lateral by a Y may
be used. Thus greater velocity on
entering the main is secured, but
this advantage is discounted by the
great difficulty of supporting the
inclined pipe (Fig. 75). To avoid
the erosion which takes place when
a free fall of water occurs, a pool
of sewage may be provided at the
bottom of the manhole into which
the fall is made, as shown in Fig.
76. This is the design adopted at
Melbourne, Victoria, and provides
a pocket, in which an accumula-
tion of water is retained.1
In some cases, as in Fig. 77, a
series of steps are provided to re-
duce the fall, the illustration show-
ing it in one of the main sewers
at St. Louis. For laterals the same
principle may be used, dropping
the grade in steps instead of by a
vertical pipe. The St. Louis steps
shown were in an 8-foot sewer,
r ig. 74
ii J feet high, with the bottom
steps on which the scour would occur, of oak. The steps them-
selves were stone.2
1 Eng. Record, Vol. 44, p. 586.
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 26, p. 345.
102
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Fig. 78 shows a manhole 65.8 feet deep, as built at Cleveland,
Ohio. To prevent the erosion that would be caused by a stream
of sewage falling freely through that distance, slabs of stone
flagging were built into the manhole in such a way that the sewage
would be checked constantly in velocity as it fell from one to
another of the stone slabs. The stone was 2 brick thick, and the
slabs were spaced 5 feet apart vertically.
; •< ' :-~::'i£.*:.+-
L__ ^_:_^ j^i-^'. \
Fig. 75
Manholes in which gates or valves are to be placed have usually
to be built with one side wall vertical, as in Fig. 73, and such
special manholes should always be carefully drawn out before
construction commences.
The frames and covers of manholes are made of cast iron,
and together weigh from 300 to 400 pounds. They have various
shapes according to the fancy of the designer, and their weight
Fig. 77
103
104 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
varies with the thickness and amount of ribbing in the cover,
and also with the height of the frame. The cover is usually
made one inch thick, is stiffened with ribs underneath, roughened
with knobs on top. It may be pierced with i-inch holes, as the
engineer believes in sewer ventilation or not. The frame for
paved streets is made deep enough to take a paving block between
its top and base, or about 8 inches for stone. For a brick or
asphalt pavement this depth might well be reduced to 4 or 5
inches, some depth being necessary to secure enough weight to
keep the frame from being displaced and to spread its base on
to the top of the brick walls. Figs. 79, 80, and 81 show three
different patterns of frame and cover.
Fig. 79, from the Report on the Sewerage of Santos, Brazil, by
E. A. Fuertes, shows the top and bottom of the cover designed for
that city. It has an elaborate system of ribbing, and a lock to
be described later.
Fig. 80 shows a Standard form of manhole made by the Sessions
Foundry Company of Bristol, Conn., known as the New York
Standard Manhole. As made, the total weight is 650 pounds,
exceptionally heavy, and massive.
Fig. 81 shows the manhole cover recently shown in contract
drawings for the construction of a part of the sewer system of
Auburn, N.Y.
Provided the freight is not excessive, it is entirely feasible to buy
frames and covers direct from large foundries, where it is cheaper
than buying from local foundries. By specifying the required
weight of cover and frame they may be made as strong as desired.
If they are designed by the engineer to be cast in local foundries,
care must be taken to so arrange the sections and surfaces that
they may be readily molded and cast; and it is wise foresight on
the part of the engineer, unless he has had special experience in
designing castings, to submit his plans to a practical foundry-
man before their formal adoption. To facilitate molding, the
stiffening ribs should not be so deep or so close together that the
sand clings and breaks off from the rest of the mold, as will be
the case unless the ribs have a good batter and are separated
MANHOLES
105
Fig. 79
II \ ^ / \ ^ ^ I \- II :^v|
I
Fig. 80
io6
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
enough to give adhesion at the bases of the projecting sand. It
may also be noted that if patterns have to be made for the covers
of special manholes of which only one or two are wanted, a large
proportion of the cost of the cover is the cost of the pattern, and by
Fig. 8 1
simplifying the latter, a noticeable saving may be effected. For
example, over screening chambers or tanks, where a large opening
may be wanted, a square cover would cost from $5.00 to $10.00
less than a round one, on account of the relative cheapness of
MANHOLES
107
the square pattern. In places, also, where heavy traffic is not
anticipated, as in fields or over filter beds, the weight of the regular
cover may be much reduced. There are occasional instances of
broken covers, but the breakage is due generally to frost, and
only occasionally to a sharp blow from a heavily loaded wagon.
There is a story of a horse breaking the cover of a large man-
hole in Washington with his hind feet, and thereby precipitating
himself backwards into the sewer; but such accidents are rare.
Fig. 82
Covers should be loose, not wedged fast in the frame, and
should be supported at three points, so that they will rest firmly
in place.
Some engineers have designed covers with simple locks, so
that mischievous men and boys may not lift them from place.
The author believes from his experience that a lock is unneces-
sary, the i5o-pound weight being ample insurance against
careless interference. Locks will rust or otherwise stick. A
cover must sometimes be removed when a key is not at hand,
and the mechanism adds to the cost. Figs. 82 and 83 show
two of the simplest forms of such locks.
io8
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Fig. 82 is the lock designed by Rudolph Hering for the manholes
at Ithaca, N.Y., the eccentric lug shown falling by its own weight
so as to engage in a hole left in the casting of the manhole frame.
Wrought; Iron
Sliding Bar
To unlock, a curved lever is inserted through an opening left for
the purpose and the lug pushed back until the cover is lifted.
Fig. 83 shows the lock used at Salt Lake City1 similar in
1 Eng. News, Vol. 31, p. 10.
MANHOLES
I09
principle, but the lock in this case is a sliding bar, working
through slots on bolts attached to the manhole cover.
Where the covers are perforated, it is customary to suspend
pans just below the cover in order to arrest the street dirt from
Fig. 84
falling into the sewer. The author doubts the necessity for
this practice, since the amount thus reaching the sewer is ordi-
narily very small, and should be carried on by the sewage with-
out causing any difficulty. If water finds its way through
Fig. 85
the covers, it fills the pans, and in overflowing carries the street
dirt with it into the sewer. Small openings in the pan about
3 inches above the bottom are of advantage in getting rid of the
water and leaving the dirt. Figs. 84 and 85 show the pans
no
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
designed for Ithaca, N.Y., for deep and shallow manholes
respectively, and Fig. 86 shows the pan as built. It is made of
galvanized iron, No. 20 gauge, and is suspended by three straps
Fig. 86
Fig. 87
resting on the top of the frame in depressions cast there for
that purpose. These pans cost about 50 cents each and have
proved satisfactory. Fig. 87 shows a more elaborate and
heavier type.1
1 Baumeister, p. 244.
MANHOLES
III
Lampholes are occasionally used to reduce the expense, but
in the opinion of the author their use is seldom justified. They
consist of a 6-inch or 8-inch pipe brought up vertically (by
Fig. 88
means of a T branch) to the surface and protected there by a
cast-iron cover. The lamphole is supposed to have two
functions, viz., to allow a lantern to be lowered into the sewer,
the light of which, seen from a manhole each side, assures the
112
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
freedom of the pipe from obstructions; and to enable fire hose to
discharge water for flushing into the sewer. For such purposes
lampholes are placed at points intermediate between manholes
where the grade or line changes and where the distance between
the manholes is so short that an intermediate manhole seems an
unnecessary expense. In the experience of the author, lamp-
holes are little used, and the economy is not proved. He
would always use manholes as being altogether more satisfac-
tory, as will readily be acknowledged should any obstruction
occur in the line in question. The additional expense of man-
holes over that of lampholes is only a very small percentage of
the total cost of the system. As temporary endings for laterals
which will later be prolonged, he believes lampholes are useful,
but elsewhere he prefers manholes. Fig. 88 l shows the con-
struction of a lamphole, and how the weight of the vertical pipe,
which might otherwise crush down the sewer pipe, is supported
by concrete. To still further save expense, the upper end of the
Fig. 89
pipe is sometimes covered with a stone and left buried a foot or
so below the street surface, the place being referenced so as to
be found readily. Otherwise a cast-iron cover must be pro-
vided, not touching the pipe, but free to settle independently, as
shown in Fig. 89.*
1 From Auburn contract drawings. J. W. Ackerman, City Engineer.
CHAPTER VIII.
CATCH-BASINS.
WHERE the system of sewers is "combined," i.e. designed to
receive both domestic sewage and storm water, or where the
system is for storm water alone, adequate means must be pro-
vided for the admission of such storm water into the sewer.
This is commonly done by making openings in the gutter so
that the water flowing there will be intercepted and led off in a
pipe to the sewer. There are a number of variations, however,
in the method by which this is done, as the following discussion
and illustrations will show:
The location of the inlet is usually at or near the street corner
in order that the rush of storm water across a street may be
avoided. For example, in Fig. 90, the grades of the street being
represented by the arrows, water coming down the gutters on
A Street would flow across B Street unless intercepted at the
points C and D. If so intercepted no inconvenience is experi-
enced by pedestrians on the crossing below, and no channel is
required across B Street, a great advantage to drivers. Simi-
larly, to avoid a rush of water across A Street from left to right
inlets should be provided at E and F. One inlet at G might
take the place of E and C, but the water would then have to be
led across or under both cross-walks.
This arrangement will be modified by the topographical con-
ditions. On the summit of a hill no inlets would be needed.
In the center of a depression 8 inlets would be needed, and
intermediate numbers would correspond to intermediate con-
ditions. The method of construction of these inlets depends
upon the use or non-use of catch-basins. Since gutter water
presumably carries large quantities of sand, gravel, leaves,
"3
114 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
sticks, manure, and other street debris, engineers in the past
have constructed, in connection with the street inlets, pits or
basins through which the gutter water should pass, and by the
reduced velocity deposit such debris. But in view of the
expense of such basins, it is desirable to eliminate their con-
struction if possible. In many cities such a basin is built in
Fig. 90
connection with each inlet, but it is manifestly possible to bring
the two inlets at each corner into one basin, as in Fig. 91, and
this economical plan would reach its logical limit by having one
basin into which all the inlets should discharge, as in Fig. 90 or
Fig. 92. Many engineers to-day believe that with sewers of
good grades, discharging freely into deep water, the basins are
unnecessary, and that any material passing through the inlet
grating will readily be carried to the outlet. Where the velocity
of the sewage is less than 2 feet per second, or where a light-
grade sewer succeeds a steep-grade gutter, so that the velocity is
CATCH-BASINS
j
1 1
1
u /'
\\ / \ /'
ililTlT
)
\\ ' / \ \ /'
\\ / / \\ ;/
\
~^i
0' 'O
?.-'•
•
/ A
\\mm\c
•z~^
// \\
O' O
^^
WM1
\
jj \
/
'/ ^
f
i i 1
i
I
1 1 i
3
1
Fig. 91
\
L
iifl-
Fig. 92
Il6 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
much diminished, or if in the same sewer itself a steep grade
precedes a light one, a catch-basin is desirable to prevent deposits
of silt in the sewer. When the inlets are from dirt or macadam
streets, catch-basins should be provided.
The size of the basin or pit is determined by the condition of
the surface drained and by the frequency of cleaning both
streets and basins. If the pavement on the street drained is
brick or asphalt, the pit need not contain more than two or three
cubic feet. If the street surface is macadam, it should be of
twice that size. It is better to have basins cleaned frequently
to avoid the accumulation of decaying organic matter, and,
therefore, too large a basin is objectionable. When the basin
is too small, on the other hand, it may fill up in the first rain,
and, if not at once cleaned out, become perfectly useless.
The author believes that basins should be avoided when
possible, but that the conditions of grades and street surface
may sometimes require them, and that old sewers, or sewers
badly designed or laid, may make the construction of basins
imperative to prevent filling up the sewer.
Gratings to hold back floating matter can generally be bought
of any local foundry, although the forms of casting will differ
materially.
Fig. 93
Fig. 93 shows a rectangular flat-top grating manufactured by a
foundry in Dayton, Ohio; 94 shows a circular flat-top grating made
by a foundry in South Bend, Ind.; and Fig. 95 a circular elevated
top; in fact, these gratings are formed of every conceivable design
CATCH-BASINS
117
or pattern. It may be safely said, however, that in spite of
the large number of these gratings on the market, such hori-
zontal openings will inevitably become clogged, since leaves,
paper, sticks, etc., which are arrested on the grating, soon form
an impenetrable coating, and the gutter water then flows over the
grating. There should, therefore, unless the inlet is in the
Fig. 94
Fig- 95
center of the street, be a vertical opening into the curb. The
horizontal grating may be retained or not. Fig. 96 shows a
horizontal grating and vertical opening, furnished by a foundry
in Cleveland. Fig. 97 shows the casting by itself. Fig. 98
shows the opening arranged for a corner inlet instead of at the
n8
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
middle of the block. Fig. 99 shows another design, for straight
curb. Frequently f-inch rods fastened into the stone curb
are used satisfactorily. About a 2-inch opening seems to
Fig. 96
Fig. 97
be the approved spacing of the grating bars. The size
of the grating varies from about 20 inches in diameter to
20 X 30 inches rectangular. The vertical opening is commonly
CATCH-BASINS 1 19
about 6 inches high, by from 12 to 24 inches wide. On steep
grades the grating may be carried into a recess in the curb, or
the opening may be depressed below the gutter to induce the
flow to enter, otherwise the velocity of the water may cause it
to shoot by.
Fig. 98
Fig. 99
Traps have been built into catch-basins with a view to avoid
the escape of gases from the sewer, but opinion is much divided
as to their necessity. Folwell, for example, holds that the inlet
to a storm sewer should be without traps, so as to assist in venti-
120
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
lating the sewer, but the test of present-day practice is that they
are generally used.
The avowed purpose of the trap is to prevent the escape of
noisome gases generated in the sewer. But such formation of
gas does not or should not occur, and the trap really remains
as an evidence of the time when sewers were elongated cess-
pools, and had to be cleaned out with shovels. The smell some-
times detected from a catch-basin is due generally to the organic
Fig- ioo
decay in the basin itself, and not to any gases rising from the
sewer. Where a proper velocity is maintained in a sewer there
is no opportunity for deposits to form nor for decomposition to
take place, and therefore, no gases being generated, the purpose
of the trap is defeated. It would be equally necessary to trap
the openings in manhole covers if traps were necessary at storm
inlets. There is, however, a function of the trap which has
value, namely, its power of holding back floating material, such
as paper, sticks, banana skins, etc. The advantage is lost,
however, in the mind of the author, by the obstruction which is
CATCH-BASINS
121
introduced into the flow of the water, the fundamental axiom to
keep everything moving in an unobstructed waterway to the
outfall, being violated. Traps are used, however, in a num-
ber of cities. Folwell found, out of 43 cities, 26 with traps on
all connections, 14 with traps on important connections, and
only 3 with no traps at all. In view of such general practice,
the elimination of the traps ought to be carefully studied in the
light of a complete examination of the sewers themselves.
Fig. 101
There are three general types of traps, viz.:
(i) A pipe trap formed by an elbow or special, in continu-
ation of the basin outlet pipe, as shown in Fig. 100, forms the
simplest trap. Here there is an elbow of the 1 2-inch pipe used,
which is built into the brick wall and cemented into the main pipe.
122
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
To remove any possible obstruction under the elbow, a work-
man must reach down under the water, or must pump out the
basin from the top, or else there must be provided an elbow,
with a clean-out, as is shown here. This represents the type
in use at Columbus, Ohio, and gives satisfaction.
Fig. 101 (Baumeister) shows a special tile trap, which is used in
Providence, R.I. There is an improvement over Fig. 100, in
that the space in the basin is not so encroached upon, but there is
no way of cleaning out the trap nor of removing the trap from
the brickwork. The section also shows in detail the method of
placing the stonework, and of forming the inlet.
Fig. 1 02 shows this type of construction carried to the extreme,
where the trap has been reduced in size until it is compressed into
Fig. 102
the thickness of the wall, forming an integral part of it. No
provision is made, whatever, for cleaning the trap, but the basin
is free from any obstruction. This is used at Margate, England.
Fig. 103 shows a basin used at Michigan City, Ind.,1 where
the trap has been removed from the basin entirely. The con-
1 Paving, Vol. 20, p. 10.
CATCH-BASINS
123
struction is ingenious — a 24-inch tile sewer on end, the 8-inch Y
forming the outlet. A concave bottom is formed in concrete
and a cast-iron cover is supported on brickwork. The chief
advantage, however, of this type, is its economy.
(2) A cast-iron hood, protecting the end of the basin outlet
pipe, so arranged that it can be removed for cleaning, is the next
type. This is the simplest and best trap if one must be built,
Fig. 103
since it leaves the entire catch-basin available for deposit, and
does not restrict the area at times of cleaning.
Fig. 104 shows the trap used in Boston as made by one of the
Boston foundries. When the hood is down, the sides form a joint
sufficiently tight to enable the trap to hold back, or at least
restrain, the escaping gases, so that they are not objectionable.
When cleaning is necessary the hood is lifted, hung on the hook
provided, and rods may be forced directly down the sewer.
124
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Fig. 105 shows the catch-basin in use at Wilmington, Del. This
is made of brick, circular in plan, 2 feet 8 inches in diameter,
and 8 feet 8 inches deep. A cast-iron hood which is hooked on
over projections left for the purpose, serves for the trap. Inside
Fig. 104
the basin is a bucket, 2 feet 5 inches in diameter, which can be
lifted out with its contents and the basin thus cleaned at one
operation. The bucket is made of heavy oak staves, very sub-
stantially, and a windlass is used to raise it to the sidewalk.
CATCH-BASINS
125
(3) A division wall in the basin built from the top down to
about 6 inches below the water level, making the trap an integral
part of the basin, constitutes the third type. This is. a clumsy
arrangement, making the basin unduly large, making cleaning
Fig. 105
difficult, and increasing the cost, both of construction and main-
tenance.
The following example may, however, be given of this form of
construction. Fig. 106 shows the elaborate basin at Peoria,1 as
designed by Mr. Parmley. This basin is 6 feet long, 2 feet wide,
1 Eng. News, Vol. 34, p. 432.
126
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Fig. 1 06
&*#2&y* . -• U U U U U LJ U..U U U U U LJ U U
'.->&;&:\h:-' '"s- -'-.-. '.. < " ' ' ' " ^11
Fig. 107
CATCH-BASINS
127
and 3 feet deep. It has two interior gratings as shown, so that
no floating or suspended matter larger than the screen space can
pass to the sewer. A clean-out is provided for the apparent
purpose of admitting the retained silt to the sewer, but a gravel
Fig. 1 08
filter allows the water to escape, after which the silt, etc., is
shoveled out.
Fig. 107 shows a similar construction used at Burlington, Iowa.
As in the preceding figure, no trap is shown because the lip of
128
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
the trap is made a grating, but the principle in each case is that
of a trap. In both of these cases, the facility with which the
Fig. 109
basins, on account of their size, can be cleaned out, is probably
not the least of their advantages.
Fig. 108 shows the old standard type used in Philadelphia.
CATCH-BASINS
129
The plan of the basin shows two intersecting cylinders, one that
part of the basin carrying the cover, and the other the trap part.
Fig. 1 10
To avoid carrying up both cylinders to the surface, the cylinder
containing the trap is arched over against the other, involving
some elaborate forms and masonry. The trap wall is a slab of
130
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
bluestone set on edge in the brick walls, and projecting about
3 inches below the water level.
Fig. 109 shows the plain and substantial catch-basin built in
Washington. It is about 4 feet long, 4 feet deep, and 2 feet wide,
containing a little more than a cubic yard. The trap is formed
by supporting one wall on a stone sill about 5 inches below the
water level. It is necessary in both these last to pump out the
basin to remove any obstruction beyond the trap.
Fig. no shows a catch-basin used at Louisville, which is a
combination of types (i) and (3). AT pipe is used, the
vertical pipe forming the trap. In addition there is a stone slab
set vertical, its lower edge flush with the bottom of the pipe. To
prevent any disturbance to the brick floor a false bottom of 2-inch
oak plank is laid down.
If no pits or traps are deemed necessary, then an inlet, so called,
is alone needed. The simplest way of accomplishing this is
' • .
•
. ,
"•« • ^Ztetifr
Fig. in
shown in Fig. in, as used in Warsaw, N.Y. The curb is of
stone, but the rest of the masonry shown is brick and concrete,
all surrounding the end of the sewer pipe and directing the flow
of the gutter into the sewer.
CATCH-BASINS
Fig. 112 shows a similar construction for Tarrytown, where a
T pipe is used at some depth below the surface of the ground.
The author believes that with a go-degree bend, substituted for
the T pipe, and then enlarged to the size necessary to fit the
Fig. 112
bottom of the inlet casting, an ideal inlet connection would be
made.
In the construction of catch-basins, brick, stone, and con-
crete have been used. Brick was used in curved forms like
those at Philadelphia on account of the ease of working, but
because of the porosity of ordinary brick and their behavior
132 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
under frost, they are not now generally considered good mate-
rial. Their porosity also permits leakage through the walls
of the basin, which is not desirable. The trap, to be effective,
requires that the water level be constantly maintained, and if
the basin leaks, this cannot be done.
In Fig. no, the drawing indicates the special requirements at
Louisville in the matter of interior layers of cement plaster. It
is generally specified that the basins shall be plastered, one-
half inch thick, inside and out, to prevent leakage, and some-
times tar or asphalt is used.
Concrete is the cheapest material of which to construct catch-
basins, and, except for the matter of perviousness, is entirely
satisfactory.
In the matter of cleaning catch-basins, each city is a law
unto itself. Folwell thinks that every catch-basin should be
cleaned after every rainfall. This may be ideal, but seems
entirely impracticable. For example, one of the New England
cities has 600 catch-basins, so that if one gang of three men and
a one-horse cart cleaned six basins a day, it would take 100
days to cover the city, or, the gang would reach each basin 3
times a year. As a matter of fact, in this city the basins were
cleaned on an average of 1.84 times per year, and that in a New
England city, where municipal housekeeping is acknowledged to
be carefully looked after. It follows that in this city, and in
others under similar conditions, the basins must soon become
filled to their capacity, and then further amounts of sediment
are carried over into the sewer, and the inference is that the
retention of a small portion only of the sediment in the basin
is not worth while. It is cheaper to dig out the sediment when
brought together to one large sedimentation basin at the outlet
if it has to be dug out, than to collect it from hundreds of small
receptacles. In severe winters trouble is had from the forma-
tion of ice on the water in the basin. A movable boiler is used
to furnish steam by which the basins are restored to usefulness.
11 below ground and untrapped, no trouble need be feared
except in extreme weather.
CHAPTER IX.
SIPHONS.
IN laying out the lines of pipe through a town, it is often
convenient, in order to avoid excessive cuttings, to arrange a
portion of the pipe line to act as a siphon. For this purpose,
the line must be air-tight, and therefore either of wrought iron or
of cast iron. Precautions must be taken to prevent the siphon
emptying itself, and so having to be primed and started fre-
quently. Some automatic device for freeing the siphon of air is
of great help in maintaining a constant flow, since the entrained
air collecting at the highest point will gradually reduce the flow
until it stops altogether. An excellent example of the use of a
true siphon is found at Norfolk, Va., the siphon having been
designed by the late Colonel Waring, and installed and operated
by the city engineer, Mr. W. T. Brooke. The illustration, Fig. 113,
shows the arrangement. The main on Brewer Street, 18 inches
in diameter, was so designed that for a distance of about half a
mile the pipe was from 16 to 19 feet deep. The soil was a
quicksand, very troublesome and expensive for such work. A
large brick building on the narrow street was additional cause
for avoiding, if possible, the deep trenching in quicksand.
Colonel Waring recommended the use of a siphon of 14-inch
cast-iron pipe, its intake at the bottom of a manhole at the
upper end, and its outlet into a manhole at the lower end. To
prevent unsealing of the siphon the lower end was provided
with a return bend which overflowed at a point 5 inches
higher than the intake end, insuring a 5-inch seal on the
siphon. The summit of the siphon is connected by a 2-inch
pipe with an air-pump so that accumulations of air may be
readily removed. It is said that this pump has to be worked a
133
134
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
SIPHONS 135
few minutes every day to remove bubbles of air, but otherwise
the success of the design is unquestionable.
About the same time that the Norfolk siphon was installed,
an engineer of Breslau, Germany, designed and built a similar
pipe line to carry the sewage from an island forming part of the
city of Breslau. The population was about 2000, and inas-
much as the channels on both sides of the island were wide and
deep, it was decided to use a direct siphon instead of the usual
submerged pipe. Use was made of a bridge, the 6-inch sewer
pipe of cast iron with flanged joints and rubber packing being
brought up to the lower chord of the bridge and so across the
river. The rise in the siphon is 10.7 feet, and the distance
between the manholes at each end of the bridge is 375 feet.
The fall or head available for working the siphon is 10 inches.
To remove the entrained air an automatic air-valve was installed
at the summit which acts as an aspirator through the agency of
a small stream of water from the city supply. It is entirely
automatic, the water being turned on by a float in the air
chamber. The usual conditions required the city water to flow
(under city pressure through an inch pipe) about two minutes
at a time and five or six times in 24 hours. It is said that the
arrangement is satisfactory and works without interruption.1
On the other hand, unless perfectly air-tight pipes are
used, continual difficulty must be expected. The Journal
of the Association of Engineering Societies, November, 1900,
describes difficulties due to air leaking through a small i-inch
iron pipe siphon used for a private water supply system, and it
was not till a continuous lead pipe was substituted that the
troubles ceased. The inference, therefore, is that while direct
siphons can be made to work, the construction must be excep-
tionally good, maintenance charges will be continuous, and their
combined cost should be compared with the cost of other
methods of construction.
For crossing gulleys and gorges a bridge may be the cheapest
and the most convenient arrangement. Fig. 114 shows a design
1 Inst. of C. E., Vol. 85, p. 464.
136
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
SIPHONS 137
of Rudolph Hering for such a structure to cross Cascadilla Gorge
in Ithaca, N.Y. This bridge was to be 120 feet long, 4 feet wide,
and 6 feet deep, of a simple Warren girder type as shown. This
was never built, the estimated cost being $1500. Instead the sewer
pipe was carried in a wooden box attached to the upper chord of
a highway bridge, which crossed the gorge at that place. To
avoid the vibration, which is the great objection to such construc-
tion, the pipe line on the bridge was made of heavy wrought-iron
pipe with screw joints. Expansion was provided for by fastening
the upper end firmly in masonry, and arranging a slip joint in the
masonry of the lower end. This has been working satisfactorily
for ten years without any repairs or special attention.
Other devices for crossing a ravine will readily suggest them-
selves. For example, a light wooden pony truss may be built,
on which the pipe may rest. The sewer pipe itself, if of iron,
may serve as the compression member of a truss to which struts
and diagonals may be attached. Since, however, it is customary
to box in the sewer pipe on account of frost, this last method
would answer only in the south. Finally, the sides of the box,
which would naturally be of 2-inch plank, may be made the
upper chord of a truss, the floor of the box being laid on a plat-
form hung between the two chords. This method is undoubt-
edly the cheapest for short spans. For protection against frost,
the sewer should be surrounded with about six inches of some
non-conducting material like sawdust, tan bark, or straw.
Mineral wool is a highly desirable non-conductor, and has the
additional advantages of neither decaying nor rotting like saw-
dust, nor settling to the bottom of the box as other material is
likely to do. The sides of the box ought to be carefully pro-
tected from the weather, a J-inch tongue and grooved sheathing
on the outside of the box being a common arrangement. A tin
roof is desirable as a further protection.
If the pipe line is carried down one side of the valley, across,
and up the other side, there is formed what is known as an
"inverted siphon," though there is nothing present involving the
principle of the siphon. The pipe in the bottom of the valley is
138
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
merely working under pressure, and the flow will always take
place, provided the outlet end is lower than the inlet end. On
account of the pressure it is usual to construct the siphon of either
cast or wrought iron, although wood and concrete have been
used. Several accessories are common, viz., an overflow at the
inlet end to discharge the sewage into the stream if the siphon
becomes clogged; an inlet pipe to admit water from the stream
Inlet
Fig. 115
for flushing purposes; and a double or triple system of pipes, so
that the variations of flow may be taken care of without a serious
reduction of the velocity in the siphon. It should be noted that
since the sewer in open channel is designed to flow half full, and
since the siphon flows full, the area of the latter should be at most
only half that of the former. Also, since, at times of minimum
flow, the velocity becomes much reduced, it is necessary to have the
siphon pipe of even smaller capacity, or else deposits in the siphon
may be expected. It is advantageous, therefore, to provide either
an automatic overflow, or else a second pipe, coming into use when
the capacity of the siphon is exceeded, in order to care for the
SIPHONS
139
140 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
maximum flow, and usually both are provided. The following
examples are cited.
Fig. 115 shows the arrangement adopted at Roanoke, Va.
Two i2-inch pipes are provided, rising vertically through the
bottom of the manhole, one to a height of 6 inches and one to a
height of 14 inches above the bottom. In this way the small flows
are all taken through one pipe, and it is not until that pipe becomes
overtaxed that the sewage in the manhole rises to the level of the
higher pipe, and the second pipe begins to flow. The overflow
pipe is also shown.1
Mr. Farnham, City Engineer of Newton, Mass., referring to
the maintenance of siphons, says that in the course of operation,
lasting six years, no emergency has ever arisen which required
the opening of the siphons in that city. They have been scraped
out once in each year, but the amount removed, grease and sand,
is hardly sufficient to justify the trouble. He describes one
siphon as follows:
The sewer is brick, 24 X 30 inches, egg-shaped, up to the point
where it became necessary to carry the flow across the Charles
River. Between the manholes on the banks, 245 feet apart (see
Fig. 116), two iron pipes were laid, one 6 inches and one 8 inches,
each pipe being provided with a gate, so that either pipe, or both,
can be used at will. An overflow pipe is also provided. The
horizontal portion of the siphon is given a good grade, and the
manhole on the lower end extends to the low point, so that by
means of a special flange casting (not shown) supplied for the
purpose, access may be had to the siphon pipe for cleaning. A
T pipe is also provided, closed with a valve, but so arranged that
a vertical pipe can be screwed on above the valve. By observing
the height of water in this pipe, and comparing with the water
level of the upper manhole, an idea of the freedom from obstruc-
tion in the siphon can be obtained. A flushing pipe not shown
in the drawing was also provided.2
Fig. 117 shows a siphon used at New Orleans, by which the
sewage is carried under one of the drainage canals. Three
1 Paving, Vol. 6, p. 154. 2 Paving, Vol. 25, p. 410.
SIPHONS
141
142 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
sewers, one lo-inch, one 1 2-inch, and one 1 5-inch, meet at
the upper manhole, while a 1 5-inch sewer leads out from the lower
manhole. Two lo-inch pipes are provided under the canal, one
being 3 inches higher than the other in the upper manhole. Only
.05 foot fall is given the lower pipe in the length of the siphon
(92.45 feet), an unusually low gradient. Besides the difference
in the levels, valves are provided in the upper manhole to direct
the flow from one pipe to the other at will.1
At Woonsocket, R.I., the main sewer, just before reaching
the disposal works, passes under the Blackstone River by means
of an inverted siphon. The main sewer entering the upper
manhole is 36 inches diameter; and for the siphon pipes, use
is made of three lines of vitrified pipe buried in concrete, one
8 inches, one 12 inches, and one 18 inches diameter. Fig. 118
shows the plan, elevation, and the relative position of the three
pipes. The grade of all three pipes is 6 inches in 100 feet. The
sewage at the upper manhole on the right falls into a sump, and
there enters one or more of the siphon pipes depending on the
opening of valves. In the lower manhole the sewage rises and
overflows into the 36-inch brick sewer which is continued. A
24-inch by-pass is also provided, controlled by a valve on the
36-inch pipe just beyond the by-pass.2
Fig. 119 shows a combined storm- water and house-sewage
siphon built at Springfield, Mass., in 1900. The sewer enter-
ing the upper manhole is five feet in diameter, the dry-weather
flow occupying but a small part of the total area. To care for
this small flow two lo-inch cast-iron pipes were laid, opening
out of a sewage basin in the upper manhole. To divert the
domestic flow into this basin a depression in the large sewer
was arranged, a large flow discharging equally into that basin
and into the storm-water basin by its side. The storm-water
siphon, a low oval cross-section 5 feet wide by 2 feet i inch high
opens out of the storm-water basin. An overflow is provided.8
1 Assn. Eng. Soc., Vol. 27, p. 211, Figs. 9 and n.
2 Eng. Rec., Vol. 39, p. 251, Fig. i.
8 Eng. Rer., Vol. 43, p. 551.
SIPHONS
143
144
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
SIPHONS
145
J— i r
in
Hit-
bfl
146
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Fig. 1 20 shows the method of separating the dry-weather flow
from the storm water, in one of the siphons of the New York City
sewers.1 It was necessary to carry the sewage from a 5-foot
5-inch sewer under the subway, the domestic flow being very
small. A small curved dam was built in the upper manhole,
Fig. i2i
through which the 1 4-inch cast-iron pipe for dry- weather flow
was laid. The storm-water siphon consisted of two 42-inch
cast-iron pipes, but to reach these the flood had to overtop the
curved dam. The 1 4-inch pipe was laid between the two
1 Eng. News, Vol. 47, p. 239.
SIPHONS
147
larger ones and all three
bedded in concrete. No
valves are provided, and
there is, of course, no oppor-
tunity for an overflow.
Fig. 121 shows the device
designed for sewers in Ith-
aca, N.Y., where two 6-inch
wrought-iron pipes incased
in concrete were used to
carry a jo-inch sewer under
Cayuga Inlet. An open
cast-iron Y was used at the
upper manhole, a piece of
brass plate being cut to fit
across the branch to divert
the flow from one line to
the other. A feature of this
design is the clean -out
bucket at the bottom of
the ascending leg which
was supposed to collect
sediment. An overflow
and flushing inlet were pro-
vided, as is shown in the
figure. This design was
never carried out.
In the construction of the
sewerage system of Buenos
Ayres, it was necessary to
carry the main intercepting
sewer, 6 feet 9 inches diam-
eter, under the Riachuelo
River. The details are
shown in Fig. 122. That portion under the river consists of three
elliptical tubes of cast iron, surrounded with concrete 18 inches
148 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
thick. These pipes end in massive abutments, which also
form the end of the main sewer. Between the pipes and the
sewer are placed 6 30-inch cast-iron pipes each controlled by a
valve, the arrangement being the same at each end. The tubes
are 5 feet high by 2 feet 3 inches wide, so that they can readily
be cleaned out by hand. An interesting detail of construction
is that in the concrete between the .tubes were embedded
lattice girders computed to carry the entire weight of tubes and
concrete from one abutment to the other, a distance of 52 feet.
On account of delay in the construction of the permanent
inverted siphon at Buenos Ayres, it was found necessary to
adopt a temporary method of crossing the river. For this
purpose a direct siphon was used. Four wrought-iron pipes,
1 8 inches diameter, were carried across the river on a light
wooden bridge constructed for the purpose. A circular well,
12 feet diameter, was sunk on the northern bank of the river,
and one 7 feet diameter on the southern bank, the two ends of
the siphon dipping into these two wells. The siphon was
started by filling it with water from the city mains (by means of
temporary valves). The siphon being started, the air which
accumulated was expelled once a day through a chamber acted
on by running water from the city mains. This siphon was
368 feet in length, the head available to work the siphon being
1 8 inches. It is said to have worked well and without a single
interruption for two years.1
In the construction of the i3~mile outfall sewer, of Los
Angeles, two inverted siphons became necessary on account of
the intermediate topography. They are both built of wooden
staves, one 38 inches, one 36 inches diameter, and are each about
3 miles long. There is little that requires comment in the con-
struction. The sewers outside of the siphon are brick, 40 inches
diameter, and a sand pit is built in the manhole at the upper
end of each siphon to arrest the sand which might otherwise be
carried into the siphon and cause trouble. These were not
satisfactory in that they caught too much sand, and the engineer
1 Inst. C. E., Vol. 124, p. 37.
SIPHONS
149
has recommended that they be cut out, trusting that the sand
will be carried through the siphon and not deposited. The
most interesting feature of these siphons is the opportunity
furnished for anaerobic bacterial action, and the effect of the
gases produced thereby on the brickwork of the sewer is a matter
deserving serious consideration.
Fig. 123 shows a very simple type of siphon, as built at Provi-
dence, R.I.1 A 68-inch brick sewer passes under the Woonasqua-
Fig. 123
tucket River, changing to a 4O-inch circular pipe, and then rising
into a yo-inch sewer. No accessories of any sort are provided,
except that there is a 20-inch overflow.
Summary. It may be well to repeat the variations in design
exemplified by the figures given. There are five different methods
of managing the variations in flow.
First. As at Roanoke, Fig. 115, by having the vertical legs of
descending pipes of different lengths, so that one only will work
with a low flow.
1 City Report, 1893.
ISO
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Fie. 124
SIPHONS 151
Second. As in Ithaca, Fig. 121, by having an open Y-pipe at
the inlet so that by a low dam the sewage may be deflected into
one or the other for low flows, and may overflow the dam in times
of high flow.
Third. As in Woonsocket, Fig. 118, by providing valves at the
entrance of a number of horizontal lines so that one or more may
be brought into use as desired.
Fourth. As in Springfield, Fig. 119, by forming a depressed
channel in the main sewer, through which the minimum flow can
be led away into a small pipe, any excess continuing through a
larger siphon pipe.
Fifth. As in New York, Fig. 120, by building a dam in the
main sewer, through which a small pipe is led to care for the low
flow. The excess overflows this low dam and enters the larger
pipe or pipes.
Another point to be noted is that in some of the designs, as at
Springfield and Woonsocket, sump-holes are built, apparently
inviting sedimentation, whereas in Roanoke and in Newton, the
inlet pipes are so arranged that no sedimentation can occur.
The only advantage of the sump is that by pumping it out, access
may be had to the horizontal line of the siphon, an impossibility
in the Roanoke design.
In building the Ithaca siphon, Fig. 121, the inlet end was
modified so that the manhole was brought down to the horizontal
line of the siphon, and a clean-out provided, as shown in Fig. 124.
A similar manhole at the outlet end made it possible to run clean-
out rods directly from one side of the stream to the other, and
thoroughly brush out the pipe.
Nearly all of the designs provide for an overflow pipe, through
which the sewage can be discharged if the siphon becomes stopped
up, or if repairs are necessary, and this would seem to be a wise
precaution wherever possible.
A flushing gate is also a wise addition if the level of the water
in the stream makes it possible. It will then be easy occasionally
to run clean water through the siphon pipes, and thus wash out
any sediment which may have accumulated. The author has
152 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
seen a design, never built, where automatically such a flush of
clean water was provided whenever any one of the several pipes
making up the siphon stopped running on account of a decrease
of flow in the sewer. The idea was evidently to wash out the
matter in suspension before the stagnant sewage had an oppor-
tunity to deposit it in the horizontal part of the siphon.
CHAPTER X.
SCREENS.
SCREENS play an important part in the process of sewage purifi-
cation. Indeed, they may be said to constitute the first or
primary step in the process. Their function is to arrest and hold
back the coarse material which is naturally brought down in the
sewage flow, such as undigested paper, rags, corks, sticks, leaves,
and similar material, which is not offensive in itself, and which
may therefore be removed before the disposal plant proper is
reached. For example, on filter beds or contact beds, the forma-
tion of a surface coating is to be avoided on account of its action
as an air-tight blanket, and a preliminary screening is of great
service in this regard. Screens are also to be used wherever the
sewage has to pass through any moving machinery, such as
pumps, valves, and siphons, where coarse material would inter-
fere with the proper working of such mechanism. For example,
if the sewage is to be lifted by a piston pump, screens are essential
just in front of the pump, or the valves will be caught by bits of
wood, corks, bones, etc., and the capacity of the pumps much
reduced. Screens are also to be used in places where the admis-
sion of water to the sewer is to be provided for, as at flushing
inlets or at storm-water inlets, and where discharge is made, as
at the mouth of the outlets. In fact, the proper use of screens in
sewer construction may make the difference between a system
working satisfactorily and a system constantly needing repairs or
overhauling.
In using screens it must be remembered that the solid portion
obstructs the channel to the extent of its area, and that, besides,
a considerable loss of head is introduced by the frictional resist-
ance of the passages of the screen. For example, a rectangular
153
154 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
screen made up of f-inch bars, with f-inch clear spaces, reduces
the area of free flow in the channel by one-half; and the cross-
section of the channel, where the screen is to be placed, ought,
therefore, to be doubled, merely to compensate for the solid screen
area. The resistance to the flow on account of the loss of head
in passing through the screen is not known. Mr. Kuichling, in
a lecture at Cornell University in 1898, noted the lack of informa-
tion on this point, and mentioned his uncertainty in providing
screening area for the intake pipe for the Rochester Water Supply.
In sewage screens the resistance is greatly increased by the
accumulation on the screen of foreign matter, so that the excess
of area provided is largely a matter of maintenance; the larger
the screen area, the less labor to be expended on cleaning, and
vice versa. Probably a free area, at least 50 per cent in excess
of the area of the sewer channel, or a screen area three times the
channel area, should be provided.
The forms of screen chamber in general use are two in number.
The first and most common is to enlarge the cross-section of the
sewer into a screen chamber, in which screens are placed at
right angles to the flow. Fig. I25,1 shows the arrangement of
one of the Boston main sewers, the area of the sewer flowing
full being 28 square feet, and the total screen area being 56 square
feet. The screens are made of f-inch vertical rods with i-inch
clear space between. These screens are really eight screens,
?i X 7J feet, two pairs of double screens being provided; one
set of each pair is left in place, while the other is being hoisted
up for cleaning.
Fig. 126 shows the Ithaca screen chamber, plan and eleva-
tion, similar in design.
The screen chamber, in the latter case, is built within the pump-
ing station building, the walls of which appear in the draw-
ing. The entering sewer is 3J-feet diameter, and the screen
chamber is 9 feet wide and 30 feet long. The screens, 9 feet
wide X 8 feet high, are in duplicate as shown. They are de-
signed with hoisting apparatus, and a horizontal apron at the
1 Boston Main Drainage, p. 54.
SCREENS
155
bottom to hold and bring up material which might otherwise be
washed off. The small pipes on the right of the figure lead
directly to the pumps. Experience with these screens has
Fig. 125
shown that the design was faulty in that the sudden enlarge-
ment of section from the sewer into the chamber caused
deposits in the corners. It was necessary to build a wooden
flume in the chamber, changing the section gradually from the
sewer section to the screen section. The screens were rriade of
i56
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
an oak frame, 10 feet wide X 8 feet high, the framework being
made of 2 X 6 pieces bolted together at the corners. The
screen itself was made of round iron f inch in diameter
fastened to the frame at top and bottom and to a center
piece by staple bolts. The screen was arranged to drop into
place between two wooded strips 2X4 inches bolted to the con-
crete walls of the screen chamber. The second screen had a
horizontal extension, reaching from its top to the end wall of
the chamber, so that if the pumps shut down and the chamber
SCREENS 157
filled to a depth greater than 8 feet the horizontal screen would
prevent any solid getting in behind the vertical screen. No
trouble has been found with the screens, nor has it been neces-
sary to raise them from place in the twelve years they have
been installed. The strength of the oak frame, however, has
been found to be insufficient, since, with an accumulation of
debris on the screen, the difference of level of the sewage has
been at times as much as 3 feet. This head of water acted
against the screen as against a dam, and the timbers 2 inches
thick were bent and threatened to break. Braces have there-
fore been inserted from the screen to the back wall of the cham-
ber to counteract this unexpected water pressure.
Fig. 127 shows the elaborate screening chamber in use at
Manchester, England. The following description is taken
from a report of Dr. Fowler, and Mr. Wilkinson, superintendent
and engineer to the Manchester Corporation, in 1902.
" The plant consists of a system of screens, catchpits, and ele-
vators, which is in duplicate, one set on each side of a central
storm-relief channel. One set only is used when the flow is
at its lowest, or when repairs are necessary. Both sets of
machinery are used during the hours of heavier flow or during
storms.
" At the entrance to the screening chamber is a fixed screen
formed of bars 4! X i inch, with 6-inch space. This screen
serves to arrest all large pieces of timber, etc., which may be
carried down the sewer from where constructional work is in
progress, or any other large floating matters which might tend
to injure the finer screens. This screen is cleared by hand.
" Between this screen and the next is a cutwater of concrete
cased in iron plates for the better distribution of the sewage
over the screens and catchpits.
" The second screen extends the whole width of the screening
chamber, viz. 37 feet, but is formed in three sections, each of
which can be worked independently. It is constructed of f-inch
iron bars with i^-inch openings. This screen is mechanically
cleaned by tines attached to channel-iron bars, which are fixed
158
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
3BBBB0QQQ
BBBQBBBBE
30QBBBBBB
BBBBBBBB0
Fig. 127
SCREENS 159
to endless chains working on sprocket wheels at each end of
the section of the screen. As the chains revolve, the tines pass
between the openings in the screen. The distance between the
tined bars is such that two of them traverse the screen at the
same time. The rate of speed of the cleaning bars with tines
is ij feet per second. The floating matter arrested by the
screen is carried by the tined bars to a point above the screen-
ing-chamber floor immediately over a wrought-iron channel.
" On passing over the sprocket wheels the tines recline to a verti-
cal position, and any matters which tend to adhere to the tines
are swept off by means of a brush into the wrought-iron chan-
nel. The brush extends the whole length of the section of
screen, and is fixed on a shaft actuated by a lever and counter-
weight for reversing the motion.
" The wrought-iron channel is cleaned with a squeegee, and
its contents loaded into wagons which pass through the center
of the chamber immediately over the storm-relief channel.
" The third screen is very similar to No. 2 (described above),
with the exception that the mesh of the screen is |-inch, the
bars being of f-inch metal. The screen is divided into four
independent sections."
The other method of providing screen area is to build the screen
into the side of the sewer, the length of the screen being six or eight
times the width of the sewer, and then to build an adjoining
section or sewer to intercept the flood after passing the screen.
Fig. 128 shows the general arrangement as used at Provi-
dence: Here the sewage is subjected to a double screening.
The sewage first passes through the filth hoist cages, of which
there are four, each about 3 feet wide and 8.5 feet high.
They are semicircular in plan, and are made of f-inch steel
rods set vertically with 2 inches spac.e between the same, the
bottom being of boiler plate. These cages slide vertically in
channel irons, a gate in front being shut to deflect the flow
through the other cage when one is raised for cleaning. These
cages are intended to retain all coarse and bulky material over
two inches in diameter.
i6o
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
The screen chamber proper is 16 feet wide by 69 feet long,
the sewer entering being 8.5 feet in diameter. The screen,
standing at an angle of about 17 degrees from the vertical, runs
lengthwise about in the middle of the chamber. The screen is
Fig. 128
made of oak slats 10 inches wide, n feet 3 inches long, and i
inch in thickness, the bronze spacing pieces which separate the
slats being J inch wide. The screen is kept clean by men with
hand rakes. Behind the screens are the four inlets to the pump
wells, each 48 inches diameter.
The screens themselves may be made in one of four ways, viz. :
(i) of a rectangular mesh; (2) of perforated plates; (3) of
vertical rods; (4) of a chain or link combination which by a
suitable mechanism is kept in motion and automatically cleaned.
Fig. 129
An example of the rectangular mesh screen used at White
Plains is shown in Fig. 129.'
1 Rafter and Baker, p. 377.
SCREENS
161
Fig. 130 shows a similar screen used at Marlborough.1 Both
were of galvanized iron with selvedge edge, i-inch mesh, and
made of J-inch (or No. 8) wire. Such a screen has to be specially
made, since the standard screening is of lighter wire. The former
screen is 7 feet 6 inches X 4 feet 9 inches, strengthened by the
diagonal tie, as shown, to allow swinging on hinges for cleaning.
No.2 Galvanized Iron Wire Screen with
Selvedge Edge I'Slesh
-411
Fig. 130
The latter is 4 feet 3 inches X 2 feet 4 inches, but proved to be
of little practical value, since the screen is placed below the
precipitation tank beyond which few solids passed.
A unique form of mesh screen was used at the Cranston, R.I.,
outlet (see Fig. 13 1),2 where the wire mesh was made up in the
form of a basket with a capacity of about a bushel, the basket
1 Rafter and Baker, p. 505. 2 Rafter and Baker, p. 477.
162
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
SECTION-AB
SCREENS
163
being suspended under the end of the outlet pipe which had a
free fall. To clean the screen it was only necessary to take off
the basket and turn it upside down.
At Wayne, Pa.,1 a horizontal wire-mesh screen was used, a
loss of head being permissible. (See Fig. 132.) The screens
first used had a mesh 2 inches square, but this was found to be
LONGITUDINAL-SECTION
PLAN
Fig. 132
too coarse to properly protect the irrigation area, and a J-inch
mesh was substituted with satisfactory results. From a sewage
flow of one-fourth million gallons about two barrels of screen-
ings per day were obtained.
The effects of a mesh screen are admirable, but its disadvan-
tage is that fibrous material clings so persistently to the meshes
that it is difficult to keep such a screen clean. A rake cannot
be used, and a brush working only on the surface fails to clean
the wires properly. For this reason slat screens are preferred.
1 Rafter and Baker, p. 534.
1 64 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
The second class of screens, perforated plates, is open to the
same objection — difficulty of cleaning — and although many
examples of their use may be found in Europe, there are very
few in this country.
At the Worcester State Hospital such a screen is used at the
entrance to the receiving tank. Four brass plates, about 10
feet X 18 inches, are set into the brick side walls, each plate
perforated with 60 holes J inch in diameter. Above the walls
and over these plates is a galvanized wire screen with J-inch
mesh to intercept the overflow in times of flood.
At the outlet chamber of the Pequannock River reservoir at
Newark, N.J., a plate screen is used in connection with the
waterworks. Four wells, each 8 X 6 X 50 feet deep, are built
in the outlet chamber, two of which contain the screens. These
are built on steel frames formed of T iron, 2\ X 2\ X f, bent
to form a square 4 feet 7 inches on a side. On this frame is
riveted a sheet of No. 18 hard copper, punched with j^-inch
holes, spaced -/g inch apart. The screens slide in grooves, and
are raised to the surface for cleaning by a 4-horsepower gasoline
engine running an endless sprocket chain to which the screens
are attached.1
An English device employing plate screens may be mentioned,
which is the cylindrical screen, consisting of a hollow cylinder
of sheet metal punched full of holes and immersed across the
channel, which the screen is made to fit tightly. The screen
revolves and continually presents a clean surface to the flow
which passes across the cylinder. A brush on the top auto-
matically keeps the surface clean.
Slat screens are the most common, and, on the whole, the most
satisfactory. They may be made of round iron or of flat iron,
and are usually set vertically or inclined at a small angle. Fig. 133
shows the screen in use at Ithaca, which has proved satisfactory,
except that the rods lack stiffness. The frame of oak' is so
arranged that the entire screen may be removed from the chamber
if desired. Ordinarily, however, a rake, so made that the teeth
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 51, p. 625.
SCREENS
I65
Fig. 133
166
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
fit between the rods, is ample provision for keeping the screen
clear. The unsupported length of the f -inch rods is 4 feet, and
it has been found that in this distance the rods are so flexible that
two proximate rods may touch, and the adjacent openings in-
crease to nearly double the intended space.
c o o oj
-a- c
o o o o o
O -6 -6-6! o
o- o
Fig. 134
In the plans for the Ontario Insane Hospital, Colonel Waring
designed a screen across, an opening into one of the tanks 8.3 X 4. 5
feet, the screen to be made of wrought iron, galvanized. The
bars of the screen were to be vertical, of J-inch round iron spaced
one inch in the clear; the height of the screen, and apparently
the unsupported length of the rods, being 4.5 feet. The author,
SCREENS
I67
in view of his experience with |-inch rods, with an unsupported
length of 4 feet, believes that the Ontario construction was too
light.
Sometimes instead of iron rods, wooden slats are employed,
making a screen similar to those used in racks for waterpower.
At Providence, for example,1 a wooden screen is described which
is placed in manholes to intercept mill refuse. This same form
of screen is used on the large screen chamber shown in Fig. 119.
Fig. 134 shows the design.
At Pullman, 111., an elaborate screening tank was built, a sec-
tion of which is shown in Fig.
i35.2 The tank is boiler iron
6 feet in diameter and 24 feet
high, the bottom being set up
from the ground high enough
to allow a wagon to drive
underneath and receive the
screenings, which are allowed
to fall through a door in the
bottom of the tank. The
screen is of rectangular mesh
with J-inch openings.
In front of the wheel pits of
a power plant at Richmond,
Va., is a fixed screen, with a
mechanical cleaning device
which merits attention. The
screen is vertical, made up of
3! X f-inch steel bars spaced
if -inch centers, 18 feet wide
and 21 feet high. In front of
this screen is a movable rake,
Fig. 135
supported on shafts at the top and bottom of the screen. The
cleaning device consists of a number of pieces of angle iron,
fastened to endless chains, which are revolved by sprocket wheels
1 City Report, 1894. 2 Rafter and Baker, p. 460.
i68
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
on the shafting, through three vertical legs. Riveted to the hori-
zontal leg are projecting teeth, so spaced that they fit between
the bars, just passing the cross-bars through which the screen
bars are fastened. These teeth are of J X i-inch iron. Fig.
136 shows the general arrangement.1
SECTION
ELEVATION
Fig. 136
PLAN
The third type of screens, characterized as mechanical, are
commonly used in England, but have found little favor in this
country. Mr. John D. Watson, engineer in Birmingham, has
recently installed a mechanical screen described as follows:
The screens are perforated, flexible, endless metal belts inclined at an angle
of 30 degrees and running over a horizontal revolving drum at each end, the lower
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 49, p. 12.
SCREENS
169
end immersed in the sewage. The drums are placed transversely across the
channel through which the sewage is passed, and are operated by a Poncelet water
wheel, driven by the flow of the sewage, the speed at which they revolve and the
capacity of the screens varying with the changes in the amount of sewage flowing.
The intercepted material is lifted out of the sewage and carried around the drum,
where a rotary brush cleans it off and transfers it to a worm conveyor placed
transversely in the rear of the screens and discharging in a barrow or truck at one
end.
Fig. 137 shows dia grammatically the general arrangement.
In conclusion it may be said that the importance of screening
as the first step towards the purification of sewage is becoming
Fig. 137
more and more recognized. Before any biological process can
be successfully carried on, all coarse and unresponsive material
must be eliminated; and while grit chambers or roughing filters
may be used, engineers are appreciating more and more the
efficiency and economy of the use of screens. At Columbus,
Ohio, for example, the engineer in charge of the experimental
plant, after experimenting with various types of screens and size
of mesh, adopted two screens of diamond mesh wire cloth woven
with No. 12 wire. The first screen had a clear opening of J inch,
and the second of f inch, and the action of the screens was con-
sidered to be of great importance as a part of the entire method
of treatment.
CHAPTER XL
STORM-WATER OVERFLOWS AND REGULATORS.
IN the construction of combined sewers, that is, sewers which
carry both storm water and house drainage, there are two methods
or opportunities for reducing the expense involved in the con-
struction of large storm sewers: First, by diverting the storm
water, in excess of a certain amount, from the trunk sewer into
a convenient stream, thereby avoiding the first cost of a long and
large trunk sewer; and second, by diverting the excess storm
water before it passes through a pumping station or on to a
purification bed, thereby avoiding the continual expense of han-
dling a large amount of storm water.
To illustrate a suitable use of these storm-water overflows,
the following example is given:^
The city of Rochester has a long intercepting sewer, surround-
ing the city on three sides, as shown in Fig. 138. This sewer
collects a large part of the city sewage, both domestic and storm
water, and prevents the contamination of the small streams
shown. When this sewer has reached the point A, the diameter
is 8 feet, and the capacity is 340 cubic feet per second, although
the house-sewage flow is only 10 cubic feet per second. In order
to avoid the cost of building this large sewer further, it is reduced
to 4 feet in diameter, and capacity of 40 cubic feet per second,
and provision made by which the difference between 40 cubic
feet and 340 cubic feet can escape through a special channel into
the waters of Thomas Brook, as shown. This has worked well
for ten years, but there are indications that the overflow comes
into more frequent use than was intended, that the result is likely
to be a nuisance in Thomas Brook, and that some remedy must
soon be provided. A second overflow is also provided, at the
170
STORM-WATER OVERFLOWS AND REGULATORS 1 71
point B, under similar circumstances, also at three other con-
venient points.
The propriety, from the sanitary standpoint, of the use of
this arrangement depends on the local conditions. If the
Fig. 138
stream is small, tortuous and sluggish, with shallow ponds,
the storm overflow should not be used. But if the discharge
is to be into a large river, already organically polluted, and
thereby unfitted for drinking water, such a device is proper
and economical.
This separation of sewage from storm water is accomplished
1/2 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
in one of three ways, viz., by a so-called leaping weir, by an
overflow weir, or by a mechanical regulator.
The leaping weir has been little used in this country, although
there are many references to it in English works. It was first
used in waterworks at Bradford to allow highly discolored
waters of storms to pass by the purer water of other stages.
Baldwin Latham also used the device many years ago.
Fig. 139 shows the principle on which it works, as well as its
practical application. The construction illustrated was built
in Milwaukee, where it was necessary to divert the dry-weather
sewage flow of some twelve old outlet sewers from the Menom-
inee River into the new intercepting sewer, the storm water
being allowed to continue through the old sewer to the river.
It is said that the device works admirably and with little need
for repairs.1 In general, with small dry-weather flow, the con-
centrated sewage falls through the opening into the intercepting
sewer, which goes to the pump or to the disposal works. In
time of storm, however, the width of opening being properly
adjusted, the heavy flow leaps the opening and is discharged
directly into the river or tide water. Moore 2 assumes that the
mean velocity of the water flowing over this weir is expressed by
the equation V. = .66 \/2g H. He then computes the hori-
zontal width of the weir by assuming that a particle will pass
horizontally from A to B in / seconds, or, if the velocity is F, the
width AB must be V. t, or .66 \/2g H X /. But the vertical
velocity is that due to a free fall, so that the distance AD will be
by mechanics = J gt2. From these two equations / may be
eliminated and the depth expressed in terms of the width, as
o W2
D = - - — • This is for a definite head, H, in the sewer, fixed
10 ri
as that depth when the weir shall come into action, and will
enable the parabolic path of the overflow to be plotted, just under
which the weir may be built wherever desired. (See Fig. 140.)
However, it is safer to provide for a final adjustment by having
1 Eng. News, Vol. 30, p. 401.
8 Moore's Sanitary Engineering, p. 72, Fig. 49.
STORM-WATER OVERFLOWS AND REGULATORS 173
174
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
the stone or iron weir at the opening movable, and only fastened
permanently after the capacity has been tested.
An overflow weir, as the name indicates, provides that when
the flow of storm water has reached a certain volume, the excess
shall pass over a weir whose height has been carefully deter-
Fig. 140
mined. By such a device the quantity passing to the disposal
plant can be restricted to a certain volume, although there
must always be a certain flow, varying, however, in concen-
tration. Fig. 141 shows the overflow weir at Cleveland, Ohio.1
A large sewer 14 feet 9 inches in diameter, known as the Wai-
worth Run Sewer, drains about 3000 acres, and carries both
1 Eng. Rec.. Vol. 40, p. 60.
STORM-WATER OVERFLOWS AND REGULATORS 175
house sewage and storm water. To avoid the discharge of
the concentrated house sewage into the Cuyahoga River, an
overflow chamber was built; the small sewer at the bottom
of the figure, 5 feet in diameter, leads to the main intercept-
ing sewer, and any excess escapes over the long curved weir
176 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
into the outlet sewer, which is 13 feet 6 inches in diameter. The
short connecting sewer shown is a by-pass to be used until the
intercepting sewer is completed. The estimated maximum flow
in the i4J-foot sewer was 2500 cubic feet per second. The
domestic sewage flow was estimated at 60 cubic feet per second,
the 5-foot sewer having that capacity when nine-tenths full.
The weir then is designed to discharge 2440 cubic feet per
second without allowing the 5-foot sewer to flow under a head.
The weir sill is 4^ feet above the invert of the sewer. The
overflow sill is built of hard sandstone, and is secured in place
by anchor bolts reaching into the concrete below. The inverts
of the sewers are lined with hard shale brick, and the rest of
the arch built of softer material.
The points specially considered in arranging the different
details were:
(1) The weir must act positively to prevent internal pres-
sure in the 5-foot sewer, or to prevent any flow greater than it is
intended to carry.
(2) The effect of the full flow in the 5-foot sewer must not
reduce the hydraulic grade or the predetermined minimum
velocity in the combined sewer.
(3) The weir must not become submerged, and the flow be
thus checked.
(4) The fall over the weir must not be too abrupt, or forces
will be set in action which tend to destroy the masonry.
The article from which the figures are taken gives further
interesting details of construction.
Fig. I421 shows a similar construction used at Providence,
R.I., the diversion in this case being to relieve the overtaxing of
two 48-inch cast-iron pipes which carry the normal effluent out
into the deep-water channel. The main twin sewers shown in
the drawing are 86 X 94 inches. The lower of the two goes
directly to the storm outlet. The upper sewer, carrying the
domestic flow, ordinarily extends to the intercepting sewer (not
shown) through a pipe 70 X 76 inches, but when this becomes
1 Prov. Kept., 1891.
STORM-WATER OVERFLOWS AND REGULATORS 177
overtaxed, the excess flows over the curved weir and to the
storm-water outlet. The arch construction for the three sewers
Fig. 142
at the junction chamber is particularly interesting, the large
arch having a span of 20 feet.
Fig. 143 shows the plan and section of the overflow weir pro-
vided at point A in the Rochester East Side Trunk Sewer,
above referred to. The section on the right, 8 feet diameter, is
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
the main sewer before the reduction in size, while the section on
the left, 3 feet diameter, is the overflow pipe.
The third class of regulators are mechanical in action, valves
which work automatically opening or shutting with the rise and
fall of the sewage.
Fig. 144 l shows one in use in the Boston Metropolitan System,
by means of which the discharge into the interceptor can be kept
constant. It was desired in this case to take from the main brick
sewers, 3 feet 6 inches in diameter, a certain uniform quantity,
Fig. 143
the surplus continuing in the sewer. On account of the limited
capacity of the interceptor, a rectangular chamber 3 feet 6 inches
by 6 feet 6 inches is entered by the 1 2-inch connecting pipe, to
which is attached the regulating device. This consists of two
copper floats, connected by a cast-iron beam. Between these
floats, and attached to the beam connecting them, is a vertical
brass pipe with open mouth, which slides up and down in the
12-inch pipe. As the floats rise and fall, the brass pipe also rises
and falls, the open mouth maintaining always the same submer-
gence. By changing the relative position of the brass pipe and
the floats, a different quantity can be discharged.
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 40, p. 74.
STORM-WATER OVERFLOWS AND REGULATORS 179
ELEVATION
1 8o
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
A different type used in Worcester, Mass., is shown in Fig. 145.*
The sewage enters the manhole from which an overflow leads into
the brook. A special regulator manhole is built near by, connected
with the former by an 8-inch pipe. A catch-basin or sand pit
2\ feet deep is provided to eliminate the sand, etc., which the
combined sewer brings down. The regulator is operated by a
float resting in the water at the same level as in the main inter-
cepting sewer. As that water rises, the float rises, exerting a pull
on the strap attached to the end of the valve, which, of course,
tends to close the valve.
0
Fig. 145
Fig. 146 2 shows a regulating device used at Harrisburg, Pa.
The problem here was to admit to the intercepting sewer in dry
weather a certain amount of creek water, in order to increase
the velocity of flow. In case of rain, however, it was necessary
to shut this off. There are two sets of three 1 2-inch vitrified pipes
laid through the concrete head wall to serve as inlets for the
creek water, one set four feet higher than the other. A silt basin
20 X 8 X 12 feet deep, with a bar grate, is introduced for the
purpose of settling and screening out silt, leaves, etc. The
water then passes through a rectangular cast-iron orifice into
the regulating chamber. A galvanized iron float is so arranged
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 44, p. 395. ' Eng. Rec., Vol. 46, p. 342.
STORM-WATER OVERFLOWS AND REGULATORS 181
as to rise and fall with the level of the water in the interceptor
at a point about 10 feet down stream; connection between the
well and this point is made by means of a 4-inch pipe. As
the float rises, the bell-crank connection with the sliding valve
causes the valve to close, and vice versa. This connection arm
is fastened into the concrete wall of the chamber by means of a
short piece of angle iron, the holes for the anchor bolts being
slotted to allow of a vertical adjustment. The attachment to
182
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
the arm is made by slotted holes on the horizontal leg of the angle,
so that the adjustment for position may be exactly made. The
face of the valve and all wearing parts are made of bronze, the
rest being of cast-iron.
Fig. 147 shows the simple regulator used on the Brookline
sewers. A bent arm acts as a lever, one end forming a sliding
gate, which opens or closes the exit from the main village sewer.
The other end is attached to a float which moves up and down in
a float chamber. When the level of the sewage in the intercepting
sewer rises to a point where it overflows into the chamber, the
Fig. 147
float is lifted and the valve closes, forcing the sewage into an over-
flow pipe leading out from a manhole on the left (not shown). A
small drain pipe leads out from the chamber so that as the level
in the intercepting sewer falls, the float descends, opening the gate.
This device has worked admirably for twelve years.
Fig. 148 shows a regulating device furnished by the Coffin
Valve Company. A copper float moves up and down in its
chamber, the motion being communicated through a rocker arm
to a valve which slides across the entrance to the intercepting
sewer as the float rises. The cut apparently shows the outlet
to the outfall, which then comes into play, the inlet not being
STORM-WATER OVERFLOWS AND REGULATORS 183
visible. The side motion of this valve differs markedly from the
other valves, which are all of the flap-valve type.
Fig. 149 l shows a regulator installed at Woburn, Mass., about
twenty years ago. A large copper float rises and falls in a well,
built by the side of the manhole. The float is attached to a lever
which, working through an opening in the manhole wall, causes
Fig. 148
the flap valve to open and shut as the sewage in the well falls
and rises.
The use of overflows or regulators is a relic of the time when
storm-water sewers formed the general type of sewers, and is
really a makeshift, to adjust the undesirable conditions thus
formed to the modern necessities for purification. Except for
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 22, p. 41.
1 84
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
the need of purification, or for the construction of long, inter-
cepting sewers to relieve excessive local pollution, no such devices
would be needed. Nor would they be needed if house sewage
had been kept out of the storm sewers. It is not likely that in
LONGITUDINAL SECTION
TRANSVERSE SECTION
PLAN
Fig. 149
the future the construction of combined sewers will be permitted
by the state sanitary authorities, so that the devices here described
will be limited in their application to old sewers built on the com-
bined plan, the proportional number of which must steadily
decrease.
CHAPTER XII.
BELL MOUTHS.
WHEN sewers are over three feet in diameter it is not neces-
sary to make bends entirely within the manhole walls, since work-
men can readily enter such sewers and remove obstructions by
hand. Also the junction of two large sewers need not be made
within the manhole, but the sewer walls can be brought to an
intersection. When the angle between the axes of the intersect-
ing sewers is greater than about 30 degrees, the walls are brought
into each other, the weight of the arches, with their loadings,
being safely carrie^J down through the walls of one of the two
sewers to the foundation. For this construction a template of
the line of intersection of the inside walls should be made, and
the brickwork carefully laid up to this on the main sewer, the
other being afterward tied on along this line. When the angle
is less than about 30 degrees, the arch thrust cannot be taken up,
and a construction known as a bell mouth must be resorted to.
In this (and the same construction applies when one sewer is
brought into the other in a curve) , the side walls nearest each other
are stopped where the springing lines intersect, and a vertical
wall is built across in the triangular spaces above. Then from
the outside walls at the springing lines a large cover arch is
thrown from outside to outside, the former small arches being
omitted. This large arch is then gradually reduced in span in
the form of a trumpet until it coincides with the arch of the main
sewer below the junction. The object of this construction is to
avoid a reentrant intersection of the two arches which would be
entirely unsupported and unstable. The section on KK in
Fig. 141 shows the conditions, the intersection of the arches
evidently introducing unbalanced and unsupported vertical
185
1 86
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
forces. The dotted lines in that figure show the relative posi-
tion of the enveloping arch which would be used in a bell-mouth
construction.
The plan of the intersecting sewers should show a connect-
ing curve even if the angle between the two lines is as small as
25 or 30 degrees. An ideal intersection will bring the central
threads of the surface flow in the two sewers together tangen-
tially, so that the connecting curve is always desirable. Such
an intersection, however, makes the quoin, or wedge-shaped
BELL MOUTHS 187
masonry, forming the edge of the intersecting surfaces, too
acute to be substantially built of brickwork. It has therefore
been customary to replace the brickwork with a cut stone
quoin, ending with a flat top at the spring-line level. Theo-
retically this quoin-stone extends, wedge-shaped, from the point
where the spring lines intersect along a curve to the point where
the invert of the upper sewer intersects the inner surface of the
other sewer. The following drawing (see Fig. 150), prepared by
one of the author's students, will make this clear. The plan and
elevation of the two intersecting sewers were drawn, and hori-
zontal elements of the two surfaces at the same level (bearing
the same numbers in the figure) were produced to an intersec-
tion. The elements of the lower part of the sewers show the
line of the quoin referred to, that is, from M to AT". An eleva-
tion of this line is shown in detail, and cross-sections at a
number of points show the wedge angle. If the arch of the
smaller sewer enters the larger sewer above the springing line,
a reentrant angle referred to above is formed, and the trumpet-
shaped arch should be thrown across both sewers, i.e., from
A-i to P-R.
Fig. 151 shows1 the horizontal considerations just discussed
illustrated by a concrete example. The main sewer shown is
known as the Wingohocking sewer in Philadelphia, and the
intersection is with a lateral at the corner of Eighteenth Street
and Bellfield Avenue. Three cross-sections are shown, illus-
trating both the shape of the floor intersection and also the
arch spanning both sewers. In the longitudinal section the
heavy line shows the curve of invert intersection.
Fig. 152 shows a similar construction in the case of the basket-
handle sections used on the Metropolitan Sewerage System of
Massachusetts. The plan and two cross-sections are given to
show the gradual change in the line of division between the two
channels, and to show the unusual form of the pointed arch used
as a cover arch. The section showing the manhole, at the top
of the quoin, shows also the curvature of the quoin in a vertical
1 Eng. News, Vol. 35, p. 163.
i88
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
BELL MOUTHS
189
plane.1 The figure also shows more clearly than the preceding
one that the plan of this line is not straight. Only when the
two sewers joining are of the same size and elevation would the
plan be truly straight, although in many other cases the approxi-
mation is very great.
Fig. 153 shows another intersection, also on the Metropolitan
1 Eng. News, Vol. 31, p. 386.
190
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
BELL MOUTHS
191
system at Boston, with the same basket-handle sewers, but
with a semicircular arch instead of a pointed arch. The effect
of the flat invert and the vertical side walls on the shape of the
quoin curve may be clearly seen by comparison with Figs. 150
and 151.
Fig. 142, showing the overflow at Providence, shows also the
cross-section of the bell-mouth chamber and the large cover
arch, 20 feet in diameter. Fig. 154 shows a photograph of the
Fig. 154
same bell mouth looking up stream at the quoin, which on
account of the weir is here made vertical. One difficulty which
may arise in this construction is the lack of head room, since
the large cover arch, if made semicircular, rises above the arches
of the connecting sewers. If the arch is flattened as in Fig. 141,
heavy abutment pressures are introduced, and additional
masonry at extra cost is required. In many cases, however,
any form of cover arch would be out of the question, and a sub-
stitute must be found.
Fig. 155 shows the alternate construction as recommended by
SK\VER CONSTRUCTION
I C r- ' .° •- V^~"__.
Fig. 155
BELL MOUTHS
193
Mr. E. H. Bowser, of Louisville, Ky.1 Below the spring line the
connection is made as before described. Above the spring
line, the walls, instead of being arched across the opening, are
built straight up to the height of the intrados of the larger
sewer. On top of these walls across the bell mouth I beams are
laid about 3 feet apart, and the spaces between the beams filled
with brick arches backed with concrete, or with reinforced con-
crete slabs. Mr. Bowser says that the crowns of these small
Fig. 156
arches should not be made higher than the crown of the larger
sewer, although the reason for such a limitation is not plain to
the author. Fig. 156 shows a sketch drawing to illustrate a
junction chamber in Minneapolis, redrawn from Engineering
News.2
Care must be taken to secure good construction, even with the
bell mouth carefully designed. There is danger, otherwise, of
the arch structure failing, as at Nashville, Tenn., where the
1 Eng. News, Vol. 35, p. 163. 2 Vol. 31, p. 268.
194 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
centers were pulled after twenty-four hours, and the whole bell
mouth caved in.
A large proportion of the cost of the bell mouth is the value of
the labor employed, and as this is ever increasing it is likely that
the construction shown in Fig. 145 will be hereafter the most
common. With reinforced concrete, a flat roof of girders and
slabs can be substituted for the I beams and small brick arches,
and unless the sewers flow full, no advantage belonging to the
bell mouth is lost. If the sewer flows full, the bell mouth is
the most satisfactory method of construction, because thereby the
two flows are brought together into one stream in a manner most
free from disturbances.
CHAPTER XIII.
FOUNDATIONS.
IF the ground through which a sewer is to pass is loam, dry
clay, sand or gravel, no special foundation is needed for the
pipe, even in the case of the largest sewers. The trench is exca-
vated to subgrade, and trimmed, when possible, to conform to
the outer circumference of the pipe, special excavations being
made for the bells. But if the bottom is mud, or running sand
or silt, or a clay, which, when wet and disturbed, softens and
slides, some special preparation for the pipe is needed.
The simplest means of adding to the stability of the pipe line
is to excavate enough below the pipe to place a wide plank
underneath, butting the plank at the end joints, and nailing on
a splice piece. It is best to have this plank low enough so that
at least three inches of gravel or ashes can be placed between
the plank and the pipe to give the latter a good bed, and avoid
a bearing on the hubs alone. This is a suitable construction
when the soft material occurs in pockets, the plank aiding to
bridge the pocket without abrupt settlement. The plank should
be well below the level of the ground water, so that there may
be no decay of the plank, a condition which usually exists, how-
ever, when any artificial foundation is needed. Often the plank
can be omitted and the foundation improved by extra excavation
and refilling with gravel. The pressure per unit area on the mud
is thus reduced, and at the same time a good drainage is provided.
Whether this is an advisable method depends on the weight of
the pipe and on the bearing power of the soil. If the width of
the pressure area is increased along 45-degree lines, the bearing
area is increased by twice the thickness of the gravel bed, or a
bed one foot deep reduces the unit pressure on the natural soil to
'95
196 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
about one-third. A 15 -inch pipe weighs, when half full of water,
65 + 40 = 105 pounds per running foot, and a 24-inch pipe
weighs 170 4- 205 = 375 pounds per running foot. If the natural
soil will not hold up the loads in either case, without undue or
unequal settlement, the gravel bed will reduce these loads to 35
and 125 pounds respectively. The level of the ground water
need not be considered, and the cost is that of the extra excava-
tion and the value of the gravel for refilling.
If the sewer is brick or concrete, and the earth is soft, or the
bottom a running sand, a wooden bottom should be put in either
as a platform or as a cradle. Care must be taken to have gravel,
sand, or "ashes well tamped under and behind such wooden sup-
ports, and the wood must be below the permanent level of the
ground water.
There is not any basis for computation of sizes of timbers in
the design of such a timber platform, base, or cradle, since the
supporting power of the natural soil is quite uncertain. It is
necessary to provide ample stiffness, and it is better to err by
burying too much timber rather than not enough. For an
average platform, cross-timbers in a trench about 3 feet wide
should be about 4X4, and in a trench 8 or 10 feet wide they
should be about 6X8.
The wooden platform used under 30-inch sewers in Manila
consisted of cross-timbers 4X8 inches, laid across the bottom
of the 5-foot trench, and the floor was made of 2-inch plank,
laid longitudinally on these stringers. The planking running
longitudinally in a trench should be spiked to the cross-timbers,
the latter spaced about 5 feet apart. Great care should be taken
to pack gravel around the timbers and under the floor plank, in
order to secure good bearing.
Fig. 157 shows a wooden cradle suitable for the outside of
either brick or concrete work. Such a cradle will usually be
from 8 feet to 10 feet long, depending on the size of the sewer,
large sizes requiring shorter lengths in order to keep the weight
of the cradle within reasonable limits.
The frames are sawed from 2 X lo-inch plank, and are spaced
FOUNDATIONS
197
about 4 feet apart if 2-inch lagging is used, and about 18 inches
apart if i-inch lagging is used. These cradles, in continuous
line, are carefully set to grade, the space between their outside
and the trench sides is thoroughly filled with sand or gravel, and
Fig. 157
often the top of the frames is nailed to the bracing of the trench.
They are, of course, left in* place permanently, and, therefore,
ought to be used only under the level of ground water.
Instead of the plank in the bottom, or sometimes on the plank,
if the bottom is so soft that concrete thrown directly on to the
mud would be injured, concrete is used as a foundation. This
198 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
may be either as a part of the sewer itself, the invert being
increased in thickness, or as a separate construction. The use
of an added mass of concrete for a foundation course is generally
not to be advised, since the weight of the concrete itself adds to
the insecurity of the foundation. The lighter weight of the
timber has a decided advantage. If concrete is to be used, as
it should be in all cases above ground-water level, the thickness
should be reduced as much as possible, and the resistance to
flexure, both longitudinal and transverse, obtained by metal
reinforcement. By this means a tough, stiff, and permanent
light platform may be placed, which does not need to be below
water level, and the cost of which is but little, if any, more than
a timber one. The thickness need not be more than 6 inches,
and the various forms of wire cloth or similar metal reinforcement
are suitable.
A last resort, when the earth seems to have little or no sus-
taining power, or is so variable as to indicate that the vertical
alignment of the sewer would be quite destroyed, is to drive
piles and thus support the sewers. Colonel Waring * invented
and made use of so-called saddle piles, which were pieces
of 2-inch plank 10 to 12 inches wide sharpened at the lower
end and so driven in the bottom of the trench that the pipe
would rest in notches cut in the upper end, a pile coming just
behind the bell of each pipe. Mr. Hastings, at Cambridge,
has driven lo-inch piles 4 feet apart in the bottom of the trench,
capping them with a 4 X 1 2-inch spruce timber, and resting
the lo-inch pipe on triangular blocks spiked to the longitudinal
timbers. See Fig. 158 for drawings showing the construction
when the pipe is reinforced with a brick arch, as well as when it
is not.
Fig. 159 shows a more elaborate design intended for an
1 8-inch pipe, the piles being double in the bent, and the bents
spaced 5 feet apart.
Fig. 160 shows the design by the same engineer, Mr. Hastings,2
for an egg-shaped sewer 24 X 30 inches. The timbering in all
1 Sewerage, pp. 58 and 108. ' Assn. Eng. Soc., Vol. 22, p. 92.
FOUNDATIONS
199
these cases is about the same, — a 4-inch floor, 8-inch longitudinal
timbers, and pile bents spaced 5 feet apart.
Fig. I6I1 shows the construction adopted in the case of an egg-
shaped 26 X 39-inch sewer in Lynn, Mass. A single row of piles
were driven longitudinally, 6 feet apart, capped with 6 X 6-inch
timbers as shown, braced by 3 X 4-inch diagonals. The
X Drift-Bolt
IIIJjLXx 6 'spruce
g 4 x 8 Spruce
N 4 x 10 Spruce
Tree Nail
Piles 4 'apart
Fig. 158
stringers are 4X6 inches on the ends and 6X6 inches in the
middle, covered with a 2-inch spruce floor. The concrete foun-
dation was placed on this floor, confined between the 2-inch
sheeting shown. The piles were from 35 to 38 feet long, and
in spite of this support, filling to one side of the sewer has
crowded the sewer sideways about 4 feet for a distance of 125
feet.
Fig. 162 shows the design adopted in Troy, N.Y., some years
ago.2 The egg-shaped brick sewer, 24 X 30 inches, was to be
carried across a marsh; and a timber cradle, supported directly
on piles, was built. The frames are the same as shown in Fig.
1 Eng. News, Vol. 35, p. 103. 2 Paving, Vol. 8, p. 314.
2OO
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
bO
£
FOUNDATIONS
201
157; but instead of the parts being fastened together into one
continuous frame, the two side pieces are bolted to the piles
Fig. 1 60
and to the cross-timber, and then the lagging is nailed on as
before. This is all, of course, below ground-water level.
Fig. 163 shows the supports for a sewer, the barrel of which
is wood staves, 3X8 inches. In this case no longitudinal
stringers are necessary, and the pile bents are spaced 8 feet
202
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
apart instead of 5. This construction, also a design of Mr.
Hastings, is adapted for an outfall in shallow water, where
the bolts required may be placed, by a diver if necessary, where
the wooden barrel is under water continually, and where the
upper cross-piece keeps the sewer from being floated away.
FOUNDATIONS
203
Fig. 164 shows the construction used to support an 8 X 8J-foot
and a 9 X i3~foot sewer at Boston.1 There are 5 and 7 piles
respectively in the bents, driven closer together in the bent under
the abutments. Both sections are admirable examples of type
Fig. 162
forms of self-contained sewers, i.e., sewers built above ground,
or in such soft material that no dependence can be placed on
the soil for backing or support.
1 Eng. News, Vol. 27, p. 512.
204
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Fig. 165 shows the cross-section of a sewer at the foot of
Canal Street, New York City.1 It is 7 feet high by 16 feet wide,
and supported on pile bents, containing 8 piles, the bents being
Fig. 163
3 feet apart. The timbering on the piles was 12 X 12 caps,
floored over with 4-inch plank, and protected with a flagstone
cover of 3-inch bluestone. The side walls were large concrete
1 Trans. Am. Soc. C. E., Vol. 31, p. 569.
FOUNDATIONS
205
Fig. 164
206
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
blocks molded in forms and weighing from 4 to 10 tons each.
The roof was made of lo-inch I beams spaced 3 feet apart with
concrete arches between.
Fig. 1 66 shows a similar construction at St. Paul, Minn.,1
the sewer being 16 feet wide by 12 feet high. Here there are
9 piles to the bent, and the bents are 6 feet apart. The caps
are 12X12 and the stringers 12 X 10 on the sides and 10 X 10
in the center. The side walls are built up of coursed rubble, and
-T~ i 1 j ( !'
Fig. 165
the invert of the sewer is formed of vitrified paving brick set in
cement. The roof is formed of 20-inch I beams, spaced 5 feet
apart with 2 -ring brick arches thrown between. These latter
have a radius of 43 J inches.
In all these designs special attention should be paid to dis-
tributing the pressure among the different piles, since with the
sewer flowing only part full the pressure under the abutments
is much greater than at the center. This is taken care of
partly by the spacing of the piles in the bent, and partly by the
use of heavy transverse timbers. It is easy to see that careless-
1 Eng. News, Vol. 31, p. 268.
FOUNDATIONS
207
208
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
ness in this regard might result in a longitudinal break at the
invert and at the crown.
Sometimes it becomes necessary to deliberately allow the sewer
to settle, making due provision for the same, as was done in Boston
about iSSo.1 The outfall sewer from Squantum to Moon Island
was planned to be built in an embankment 20 feet wide on top, and
about 30 feet high (see Fig. 167), the embankment being formed
by newly made fill on the mud flats, whose elevation was about that
of low tide. It was at first supposed that the mud was underlaid
by gravel, and that no difficulty would be encountered in making
Position 1883,
tion 1890
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
Fig. 167
the embankment stable from the first. But it developed that the
gravel was only a thin stratum, and that it in its turn was under-
laid by mud. A temporary box sewer was built on piles along-
side, and the embankment was built and allowed to settle, careful
observations being made as to the rate of settlement. For this
purpose six rods were placed vertically in position in the longi-
tudinal axis of the filling, with iron plates 2 feet square at their
lower ends, which were set at the top of the embankment as
soon as it was brought up to grade. Additional rods were
screwed on where necessary, and levels read regularly from
above on each of the six rods. For nine years the fill was allowed
1 Assn. Eng. Soc., Vol. 11, p. 355.
FOUNDATIONS
209
to settle, and Fig. 168 shows the settlement from 1885 to 1890,
the total settlement in the four years prior to 1885 being as
follows :
Plate at Station 369 + o 17 .09
Plate at Station 374 ....
Plate at Station 382 + 50.. . .
Plate at Station 389 + 22.. . .
Plate at Station 396+54.. . .
Plate at Station 401 + 79. ...
3.89
30-55
1.26
J-53
i .42
1885
0.1
0.0
0.3
0.1
0.5
0.0
o Reliable Observation
•V Unreliable Observatioi
Fig. 168
The diagram shows that the curves are all gradually approach-
ing a direction parallel to the axis of the curves, and that in time
the settlement would cease. In this case the construction of the
masonry sewer was begun before the end of the settlement,
since the wooden temporary sewer was rotting away, and the
grade of the sewer was raised to provide for an estimated future
settlement.
The proper design of a foundation, and a reasonable adjustment
of the character of the foundation to the necessities of the particu-
lar case in hand, call for the best judgment of the engineer, and
should be based on experience and observation. Elaborate
210 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
foundations in soils which may not require them may indicate
the anxious conservatism of the constructing engineer, but they
are extravagantly expensive, and may expose the ignorance of
the engineer quite as much as a failure of a sewer due to insuffi-
cient foundation. A municipality before entering into any
extensive foundation work for sewer construction can well afford
to secure advice from engineers experienced in such work, rather
than follow the designs of a local engineer whose training has not
given him the special knowledge obtained in wider practice.
CHAPTER XIV.
OUTFALL SEWERS.
FREQUENTLY the term "outfall sewer" is applied to that part of
the sewer system between the point of discharge and the last
lateral, or between the point of discharge and a pumping station
or a disposal plant, in which cases no special construction is
required. On the other hand, there are definite and peculiar
forms of construction used in the building of the discharge end
of a sewer system.
In the simplest form of discharge the sewer is led in its trench
to the bank of the stream and there ended, and the only special
construction is the masonry wall, which should always be built
around the end of the pipe to protect it against blows from above,
and from erosion of the water from beneath. Fig. 169 shows the
design of Mr. Hering for such a construction.1 Frequently this
form of construction does not have the end of the pipe submerged,
and, the pipe being high out of water, the construction of the wall
is a simple affair. Proper construction, however, demands that
the outlet be submerged, or, if the sewer is a combined one, that
that portion which carries the dry-weather flow be submerged.
This may conveniently be done by taking out a smaller pipe from
the invert of the large sewer, for the dry-weather flow. This
small pipe can be carried out to deep water, or to a point where it.
is submerged in a good current, far more easily than could the
larger sewer. In Harrisburg, Pa., for example, the sewers end
at the foot of a bank, at the edge of the Susquehanna River. In
summer, there is only a foot or so of water flowing over the rocky
bed. It would be manifestly impossible to carry out a 4-foot
sewer to be submerged in a foot of water, but two lengths of
1 Ithaca, N.Y., 1892.
212
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
lo-inch pipe carry out the house sewage, and the large sewer
discharges the storm water, and both operate without producing
any nuisance.
Fig. 170 shows a design for an outfall of this sort in Bingham-
ton. The combined sewer is 4 feet in diameter, and the outfall
pipe is 12 inches. To secure a freedom from flow out of the
big sewer except in time of storm, a concrete dam is built in the
big sewer, 6 inches high, to force the sewage to drop through
Fig. 169
the opening into the smaller pipe. This dam is not usually
necessary, however, unless the grade is very high. This plan is
often adopted to avoid the necessity of building a large sewer in
a deep trench or down a steep bank.
Fig. 171 shows a conventional design recommended by
Moore, and Fig. 172 shows the actual construction of the
Niagara Falls outlet. The main trunk sewer is 38 X 48-inch
brick, and at the disposal point a shaft 5X7 feet is sunk below
the sewer to a point level with the bottom of the cliff, exposed in
the gorge a depth of about 50 feet. A sump hole allows the
OUTFALL SEWERS
213
214
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
falling water to strike without
causing damage. From the
face of the cliff a tunnel is
driven 5X6 feet in section
to the bottom of the shaft, on
a 10 per cent grade. This
tunnel is smoothed up on the
bottom with concrete and
brick into a semicircular
channel, but the arch is left
unlined. The mouth of the
tunnel is protected by a heavy
masonry arch and retaining
wall. Then down the slope
at an angle from the horizon-
tal of 38 degrees is laid a
3 -foot circular wood pipe.
This pipe is anchored at the
bottom of a mass of 70 cubic
yards of stone masonry
thoroughly tied together with
iron straps and collars. A
water cushion is provided at
the lower end of the pipe.
Figs. 173* and 174 show a
more elaborate construction at
the mouth of the Aramingo
Canal Sewer in Philadelphia,
the invert at the outfall being
three feet below low water.
Piles were driven in bents in a
trench from which the soft
mud had been dredged and
which was then refilled with gravel and cobbles. On top of the
cobbles was a cement mattress made of two sheets of burlap with
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 44, p. 614.
OUTFALL SEWERS
Fig. 172
173
OUTFALL SEWERS
a layer of cement and sand between. Then on this mattress con-
crete blocks, already formed, 6 X 11X4 feet, weighing about
1 6 tons each, were set by a derrick, two blocks forming the
entire bottom. The top of these blocks was above low water,
and concrete in situ was used for the side walls. At the extrem-
ity an end wall was carried to the bottom, 24 feet below low
water. For this, large molded concrete blocks, weighing 88
tons, were used, the third row of blocks bringing the surface
well above water.
The sewer outlet of the South Metropolitan District of
Boston l is an example of a submerged outfall of unusually
large size. (See Fig. 175. )2 From the outlet end of the main
sewer on Nut Island, five 6o-inch cast-iron pipes extend out into
the tide water to a depth of about 38 feet at high water. These
pipes are standard 1 2-inch lengths of ball and socket pipes,
weighing 12,000 pounds each, and extend out from low- water
line about one mile. The pipes were jointed in 48-foot sections,
and floated out to place under a specially designed caisson.
When at the proper point, the pipe was slowly lowered into the
trench dredged for it. The joint is a conical lead joint, and
the pipes were aligned and drawn together by divers who had
powerful ratchet jacks for that purpose. To aid in guiding
the pipe into place, short piles were driven 6 feet apart longitu-
dinally, and 5 feet apart transversely. The outer end fits into
a special 6o-inch elbow surrounded by a rectangular timber
casing resting on piles. The horizontal flange of the outlet pipe
is capped by a cut granite ring, and outside of this, resting on
piles, is heavy slab paving.
The Broadway outfall sewer of New York, discharging into
the Harlem River at iQ2d Street,3 is a twin horseshoe-shaped
sewer, the combined capacity of which is equal to that of a
1 6-foot circular sewer. This section was adopted because the
sewer grade was for long distances above the level of the ground,
and a low, flat sewer reduced the amount of filling necessary.
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 48, p. 217. 2 Report 1899, Plate 5.
8 Eng. Rec., Vol. 52, p. 550.
218
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
OUTFALL SEWERS
219
A concrete cradle is built under the invert with two layers
of brick forming the invert. At the extremity, and at inter-
mediate points, piles are freely used to support the weight of the
masonry. A large outlet chamber has been built at the end, so
arranged that the discharge openings are submerged i foot at
low tide and 7 feet at high tide. The chamber (see Fig. 176) is
trapezoidal in form, 57 feet long on its outer side, 41 feet long
c
Fig. 176
on its inner side (the width of each sewer is 15 feet), and
21.5 feet wide. The height is 22 feet, the heavy concrete roof
being carried on I beams. The inverts of the sewers are at
mean low water, but in the chamber a flight of steps brings the
sewage down and out through openings in the face.of the cham-
ber which are entirely submerged. The masonry chamber was
built in a timber caisson, floated out to place, and sunk on to the
22O
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
concrete and pile foundation, which had been previously placed
directly in the water.
New Rochelle,1 situated on an arm of Long Island Sound, has
carried its outfall sewer across Echo Bay and through tidal
flats whose surface is only a few feet above low water. The
outlet, a 30-inch cast-iron pipe with ordinary lead joints, was
laid by a diver. Four lengths of pipe were placed on planks
between two scows and the three joints made up. A chain sling
was provided for each pipe so that by attachment to overhead
cross-timbering the pipes were lifted off the plank and then
lowered into the trench. The joints between the sections were
made, by the diver, with jute and cold lead.
A small outlet discharging on to an ocean beach was installed
Fig. 177
at Spring Lake, N.J.2 (See Fig. 177.) The outlet pipe is 8-inch
wrought iron with screw connections, provided with flexible joints
at intervals of 40 and 80 feet. It is 650 feet long and ends in 20
feet of water. At the outer end is a heavy cast-iron anchor plate,
weighing f ton. The construction is simplicity itself. The joints
were made on shore, and the pipe was floated out, supported on
buoys, and sunk by cutting loose the floats. An emergency lo-inch
wrought-iron pipe is also provided, its outer end fastened to a
timber pile work at about low water level. Connection with the
city water supply is provided, so that if necessary a strong flush
of water may be had through the outlet.
A wooden pipe has been employed where the outfall is to be
carried out into deep water, as, for example, at New London in
1 Eng. Rec., Vol. 52, p. 443. a Eng. Rec., Vol. 42, p. 617.
OUTFALL SEWERS
221
1892, and at Ithaca in 1894. The advantages are that wood
pipe is, or has been, cheaper than cast iron, and that it lends
itself to launching and floating into place more readily. Fig. 178
shows a cross-section of the New London pipe. At Ithaca,
the outfall pipe extended 6000 feet into Cayuga Lake, into a
depth of water of 27 feet. The pipe was built on ways at
Fig. 178
right angles to the shore line and the forward end carried out
into the lake as fast as the pipe was built in the rear. The pipe
was loaded with railroad rails for sinking, and temporarily held
up by oil barrels, which were cast off when it had reached its
place and was ready for sinking. It was shoved forward from
behind and was lined up with temporary piles. A detached
section, 1500 feet long, was readily pulled around by a man in a
222 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
row-boat. At New London, the end of the wood pipe ended in a
heavy anchor plate, and an elbow with a conical diverter. In
Ithaca the end of the pipe was raised on a box of stones, just
high enough to give a clearance of three feet above the bottom.
The original outfall pipe at Old Orchard Beach, Me., was a
six-inch cast-iron pipe, joints leaded in ordinary fashion, and the
line of pipe $00 feet in length held together by a chain fastened
to each pipe and running from end to end. A steamer off shore,
by means of a long hawser, and the aid of small toboggans placed
underneath the bells to make the sliding easier, pulled the pipe
down the beach, where it had been put together, until the outer
end was in about 8 feet of water at low tide, and there it was left.
It is important that the outer end of the pipe be so arranged
that the flow of sewage does not cut into the beach and undermine
the pipe.
At Burlington, Iowa, for example,1 where the main trunk sewer
discharges into the Mississippi River, a stone spillway was entirely
washed away in 1898. The sewer in two parts, one 10 feet
and one 12 feet in diameter, ended about 200 feet back from the
water's edge, and about 20 feet above low-water stage. The
sewage was supposed to flow from the sewers down a specially
prepared spillway into the river. A number of piles were irregu-
larly driven into the slope, and stone filling placed between. The
piles were capped by stringers, and a wooden floor of 3 X 1 2-inch
pine planks laid on top. Then paving stones on edge were laid
on the plank, the spillway thus formed being 25 feet wide and
about ico feet long. The side walls were 4 feet thick. A
summer rainstorm gorged the sewers, and tore out the flume
completely, the estimated velocity of the sewage down the spillway
being 20 feet per second. The repairs were most thorough,
and the construction is shown in Fig. 179; 438 piles were driven
under the new spillway, with an average length of 137 feet. Rip-
rap was then placed by hand between the piles, and the voids were
filled with gravel. Above the riprap was a bed of concrete,
3 feet thick, with paving blocks for the wearing surface. Heavy
1 Paving, Vol. 19, p. 267.
OUTFALL SEWERS 223
side walls 8 feet thick were built to confine the flow, and a seg-
mental arch cover turned between, the whole carried down to
low water. The flow line was in the form of a reversed curve
instead of an inclined line, in order to deliver the flow horizon-
tally, and not cut into the bottom. Such a structure is expensive,
the published cost of this being $22,419.
At Los Angeles, the outfall was a line of 24-inch cast-iron
flanged pipe extending 600 feet into the ocean, laid on the slop-
ing beach. Rings of pure rubber f inch square were laid
between the flanges of these pipes. The pipe was put together
on timber stringers, resting on rollers, so that by capstans the
whole could be forced out into the water. No method of anchor-
ing or fastening the pipe was adopted, although it was exposed
to the full action of the Pacific Ocean. The outer end was sub-
merged in about 20 feet of water. This pipe was put in place in
November, 1893, but within two years the strong littoral currents
shifted the pipe 15 feet out of alignment, and broke it at a point
about 100 feet from shore. The sewage, coming through the
pipe at high velocity, due to the 8 per cent grade, cut out a large
basin, into which section after section of the pipe fell, finally
affecting the brick sewer on land and the very bluff itself, which
was rapidly undermined. The cutting was temporarily stopped
by driving sheet piling at the toe of the bluff, and carrying the
sewage out through a wooden trough into deep water. Within
the past few years an entirely new outlet has been laid in connec-
tion with an overhauling of the long outfall from the city to the
ocean.
Fig. 1 80 shows a riveted steel pipe 4 feet in diameter, built
in Toronto in 1892, to carry the Parliament Street sewer out
into the deep waters of Lake Ontario. The entire structure is
below water and was put together by a diver. The author
has seen similar construction used to carry sewers into Lake
Michigan.
As the summary of this chapter it may be said that there are
a number of ways of making the final discharge of sewage into
the body of water which is to receive it.
224
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
OUTFALL SEWERS
225
226 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
It may be enough to let the sewer project through a small
retaining wall on the bank of the stream.
It may be necessary to enter the invert of the main sewer
with a small pipe in order to carry the dry-weather flow out
under water.
It may be necessary to carry the sewer full size out into deep
water, supporting the sewer on piles and grillage, or laying one
or more large submerged pipes.
Submerged pipes may be jointed on shore and pulled out
into the water lengthwise, or they may be put together from
scows and sunk, or they may be jointed in sections, floated out to
place in caissons, sunk and jointed by divers.
By the use of wooden outfalls for small sewers, some advan-
tage is gained over iron pipe, since the wood pipe can be floated
in great lengths. It has to be weighted, however, to sink it.
The author remembers one large box sluice built a half-mile
long to carry sewage from the en4 of the pipe sewer to the dry-
water channel across a mud flat. It was supposed that the
box was properly fastened down, but a high tide lifted it from
its fastenings and floated it out to sea.
Finally, the sewer may end at the bank, and a pipe or a paved
incline may be built, but care must be taken or the velocity of
the flow will tear out the structure. There is also danger that
in shallow water the flow will undermine the bank and so
endanger the structure, even if a pipe line is used extending
many feet out from the water's edge.
CHAPTER XV.
HOUSE CONNECTIONS.
THE purpose of a sewer system is the removal of storm
water from the streets and the removal of domestic sewage from
the houses. For the former purpose catch-basins in the streets
as already described afford the connection. For the latter, lines
of pipes known as house drains must be built from the street
sewer to the house plumbing. The house drains are usually
of sewer pipe and connect with the sewer by means of a Y or a
T branch. The latter, while more convenient in laying, does
not permit as smooth an entrance of the house drainage into the
sewer, and Y branches are therefore always to be preferred.
To connect properly such a branch, a one-eighth-bend must be
used, and the house drain is thereby set over sideways about
fifteen inches, as shown in Fig. 181, due allowance for which
must be made in opening the house-drain trench. For this
reason it is important to record the kind of branch used,
whether Y or T, for the benefit of drain layers. The prelim-
inary location of the branches is largely a matter of estimate,
but before the contractor orders his material he must be given
the exact number. The general rule is to place a branch for
each lot on each side of the street, and for a preliminary
estimate the distance apart of the branches on each side of
the sewer may be taken as the average width of the city lots.
For exact determination the number of lots must be counted for
each line of sewers, keeping those of each block separate. In
undeveloped areas the probable future width of the lots must
be assumed. A final statement can then be prepared giving
the number of branches for each size of pipe.
For brick sewers the house connection is made by means of
227
228
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
"slants" built into the brickwork at the proper points. These
are properly located above the horizontal diameter of the
sewer, that is, in the arch, and should slant in the direction of
the flow of the sewer, so that a one-eighth-bend is also needed
here. In the brick sewers as well as in pipe, the branch should
be inclined upward slightly, both to save excavating in the house-
drain trench and to give the house drainage a good entering
velocity. In both cases the refilled earth must be well tamped
under the branch to prevent its breaking off, and if the trench is
Fig. 181
deep or the ground soft, a shovelful of concrete should be
added under the branch. The one-eighth-bend is not laid until
the house connection is made, since it extends out beyond the
sides of the trench, and the Y branch is closed with a tile cap.
These caps are cemented in, either by means of a narrow fillet
around the edge, or by filling in over the entire cap, first with a
thin layer of clay, and then with cement mortar. Where clay
is used the cap is easily removed when necessary. In wet ground
the cap should be carefully set and never omitted, since a large
amount of ground water may enter the sewer through Y's unless
they are made water-tight. Since, presumably, all the Y's will
be dug up later, their location must be exactly recorded. This
HOUSE CONNECTIONS
229
is best done by measurement from the center of the nearest
manhole up stream. It is of great service further to stand a
piece of wood edging, or a piece of 2 X 4 vertically in the
trench directly in front of the Y, the top 4 or 5 inches below
the surface. In this way the Y is located at the surface and
the strip of wood can be followed down to the Y. A piece of
wire has also been used for this purpose. On a curbed street
a mark cut in the curb opposite the Y will aid in the recovery.
Fig. 182
The record is sometimes made by noting the distance up stream
from where the side lines of a house or where a fence line pro-
duced cut the sewer line. (See Fig. 182.) The objection to
this method is that in the record the houses and their respective
side lines are apt to be confused.
The size of the house drain is determined by experience and
not by computation. Probably a 2-inch pipe would carry off
the sewage of the average house at a reasonable rate, but it has
been found that the danger of obstruction in small drains, both
from grease and from cloths, brushes, etc., is very great, and the
minimum size may therefore be taken at 4 inches. Five-inch
drains are common, that size being a compromise between a
four-inch and a six-inch pipe and also just large enough to
230 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
admit the 4-inch cast-iron soil pipe and give a good joint. Prob-
ably 6-inch pipe is most used, however, since, it is argued, if the
pipe is to be large enough to prevent obstructions, there ought
to be no half-way measure about it. The Y branches on the
sewer line must, of course, correspond to the size of house drain
adopted. In cities where plumbing regulations are in force, the
size of the house drain is a matter of law, and is determined by
the board making those regulations. The grade of the house
drain should be at least 2 per cent, or J inch, to one foot, although
the drain will work (but with constant danger of stoppage), at
half that grade. The drain should be as carefully laid as for a
sewer, true to line and grade. In England running traps at the
houses are made of terra cotta, and are provided with a clean-
out branch located in a manhole, so that rods can be run down
the drain — an admirable construction, especially on flat
grades. In this country the running trap is made of iron, and
if the drain gets stopped up, the trench must be reopened, the
pipe taken up, cleaned out, and relaid. In passing, it may be
noted that there is little or no danger of house drainage freezing
and if the house fixtures permit, and the grade of the drain
makes it desirable, the pipe may with safety come to within a foot
of the surface of the ground.
Where the street sewer is deep, i.e., 10 feet or more below the
surface, it is customary to extend the Y connections by means of
a vertical pipe up to within about 6 feet of the surface in order to
make the matter of house connections more economical. This
is done either by using T's on the main pipe, and setting one or
more lengths of vertical pipe on them (Fig. 183), or by using
vertical elbows on the Y branches (Fig. 184), which are then set
horizontally. The author prefers the former method, although,
theoretically perhaps, the latter commends itself. Where the Y
and elbow are used, the weight of the vertical pipe is eccentric to
the main sewer and tends to break away, thus letting ground water
readily enter the sewer. If the side connection is used, concrete
should be well tamped in under each Y and elbow, so that they are
firmly held in position to carry away the vertical load. Then
HOUSE CONNECTIONS
23l
again, the side connection in a trench which is sheeted will usually
extend out into the sheeting, requiring a wide trench at the start,
or else much cutting and waste of lumber to set the connection.
With T branches on the top, on the other hand, no such difficulty
occurs. Again, a T branch on top can be used for a connection
from either side of the street, and no confusion in the records can
be made by substituting a Y on one side for one on the other. A
Fig. 183
double Y may be used, as shown in Fig. 185, from plans for
Manila, P.I.
Since Y or T pipes are expensive, since the number of house
connections that will be used is uncertain, and since the vertical
pipe needed with a deep sewer adds to the cost, it is possible that
the construction of house connections at the time the main sewer
is built may involve a large and perhaps unnecessary expense.
The author has occasionally built a deep outfall sewer without
house connections, and later, when the growth of the city demanded
it, built a shallow 6-inch line, one block at a time, emptying into
the deep sewer at the manhole, and so saved money. For exam-
232
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
ELEVATION
pie, a 4-inch branch out of a 2-foot length of 24-inch sewer costs
about $5.00. A block 600 feet long, the sewer 15 feet deep,
would require
24 branches at $5.00 each $120 .00
24 elbows at 50 cents each 12 .00
24 risers, 9 feet long, at 10 cents per foot 21 .60
Concrete, J yard each at $6.00 per yard 48 .00
Extra excavation 50 .00 $251 .60
Interest for 10 years 125.80
$377 .40
Small lines, 552 feet of 6-inch pipe laid at 30 cents $165 .60
24 Y's at 50 cents 12 .00
24 elbows at 50 cents 12 .00 $189 .60
HOUSE CONNECTIONS
The author believes that in many cases
economy would be served if no connec-
tions were provided for at the time of
construction, but that a two-story line
should be built, the construction of
the upper pipe being deferred until the
development of the territory demanded
it.
Where the trench is in rock and shal-
low, so that Y branches are to be built,
it is well to put a charge of blasting
powder into the side of the trench, where
the house connection will come. Other-
wise, when the blasting for the house-
connection pipe is done, the main sewer
may be injured. If,
on the other hand, the
rock for three or four
feet from the main
sewer is all broken,
though undisturbed
otherwise, this loose
rock protects the main
sewer from future oper-
ations.
Where the street in
which the sewer is
ordered is to be paved
in the near future, the
house-connection pipes
should be laid to a
point just within the
line of the proposed
curb. This causes
Fig. 185
some loss, since not all of the connections will be used, but the
territory will be well built up if paving is contemplated; and if
234 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
the wishes of the property owners are considered, the connec-
tions will, for the most part, be adapted to immediate use. If
these cross-pipes are not laid, the pavement will have to be torn
up for each connection made, which destroys the value of the
pavement.
CHAPTER XVI.
SURVEYING.
THE methods of surveying outlined in this chapter are those
to be practiced by the constructing engineer. The chapter will,
therefore, exclude the topographical methods required to prepare
the maps from which the design is made.
The first task of the engineer, is to locate the sewer line on the
ground, guided by the paper location which has been made on
a scale of about 40 feet to an inch, such a map showing, as far
as possible, all the underground structures.* The sewer line i*f
located with due reference to other pipes, in some streets coining
between the gas and water, in others on one side, avoiding also as
far as may be the storm water drains, the electrical ducts, and any
other subsurface pipes. Under ordinary conditions, for an inter-
mediate trench, there ought to be about 8 feet between pipes
already laid, in order that the new trench may not cause caving.
If the old trenches were each 3 feet wide there would be 5 feet of
undisturbed earth between them, and a 3 -foot intermediate trench
would give on each side one foot only of stable earth. In material
like sand, which needs close sheeting under all conditions, width
enough for driving the sheeting is all that is necessary. In a
gravelly loam or hard-pan, the undisturbed solid earth will probably
stand up without sheeting, but if such material is refilled into the
side trenches, it will all cave into the intermediate trench unless a
wall of undisturbed earth intervenes.
The manhole location is determined by the position of the pipe
lines of the side streets. For convenience, with the new sewer
located on the map, the distances to the curb or to the housefronts
are scaled and noted, and then, by making these measurements on
the street, stakes may be set on line. The approximate location
* See Plate II of Sewer Design.
235
236 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
of the point of intersection can be found by marking the lines in the
cross street by a couple of stones or even by pieces of sod, and lining
in these two points by eye as the engineer stands on the line of the
main sewer. A variation of a foot is not important, and the proper
location of the manhole with reference to the laterals can easily
be made to a less distance than this. A nail is driven in the street
to mark the center of the manhole thus determined, and the sewer
line is carefully chained, beginning at the lower end of the sewer and
recording the location of the manholes as + stations. After the
main sewer from end to end has been chained, then each lateral is
chained, starting at the junction manhole on the main sewer.
The nails marking the manholes should be carefully referenced
to nearby objects, so that they may be easily recovered. At least
three ties should be taken with the distances recorded to tenths of
a foot. The points of reference should be clearly denned, for
example, not merely a telegraph pole, but the center of the head
of a nail driven well into the side of the pole.
The nails at the manholes will be dug up when the trenches are
opened, and it is a waste of time to leave permanent marks on the
sewer line. Some engineers, however, line in this chaining with
a transit, leaving nails driven at the 50 or 25-foot points, and also
drive offset spikes, which are measured over from these center
line nails. The stationing of such spikes will of course not be
accurate, but no very great discrepancy should exist. A better
method, the author believes, is to have on the sewer line only the
nails marking the manhole centers, and have the intermediate
points marked altogether on the offset line. To do this, a point is
located on an offset equal to two feet more than the half width of
the trench, that is, for a 6-foot trench, the offset would be 5 feet,
always on the same side, going up grade. The transit is then set
up over the offset point and spikes lined in at 25-foot distances,
to a point measured over at right angles as near as can be estimated
from the nail at the next manhole. When the distance to that
manhole has been measured, the transit must be set over the
manhole center again, the new offset point set, the transit set up
over the point and the next block lined in. If there were no angles
SURVEYING
237
at the manholes, the chaining and stationing would not have to
be interrupted, but as there always is an angle, greater or smaller,
the offset chaining is always broken. (See Fig. 186.) It is con-
venient to have the two offset spikes, necessary at each manhole,
set when the first chaining is done,
if a transit is used then. But if no
transit is used, it must be done when
the offset lines are established. It
saves a large amount of time later,
if the trenching is soon to follow, to
protect the offset spikes and enable
them readily to be found, and if
sewer pipe has been brought onto
the ground, a pipe set vertically
around and over each nail keeps it
from being covered or injured. The
contractor may be confused in
opening the trench by working from
offset spikes, and he must be watched
until his understanding has been
made perfect.
To mark the offset point the
author has found railroad spikes
the most convenient for macadam
and asphalt, although a 4openny
wire nail will answer. In brick
and stone block pavement, a small
movement of the point in distance
may be allowed to bring the spike into a crack, although the
line must be held, since this line is used to give the sewer
line. In dirt streets a spike may not be stable enough and pins
a foot long — made of one-quarter inch iron — may be necessary.
If the road has been metalled at all, the 4o-penny nails will stay in
place when driven well into the metal.
The trench is opened from these offset spikes and the contractor
should be furnished with a profile to good scale showing the depth,
Fig. 1 86
238 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
marked in figures, to which the trench is to be dug. When the trench
is within a foot or so of bottom, grade boards should be set, but it
is not desirable to set them earlier, since they are in the way.
In a narrow and stable earth trench no sheeting may be required.
In that case the grade boards are independent of the sheeting.
There are a number of methods of placing these boards. The
simplest is to place on edge across the trench a two-inch plank
long enough so that it may have about two feet on the solid ground
on each side. These ends are then covered with dirt, or piled up
with stone to hold the boards firmly in place. Sometimes, in order
to get these planks and the grade line attached to them up out of the
way of the shovellers, the planks are set up on top of pipes which
are placed vertically, and filled with dirt in which are set 2-inch
by 4-inch sticks well down into the pipes. The planks are then
rested on the pipes and fastened to the 2 by 4-5. Sometimes a frame
is made as shown in the sketch, Fig. 187. The base of the frame
gives stability, large stones are superimposed, if necessary, and
the plank are held by pins. Sometimes, instead of the ends of
the plank being held by earth or stones, stakes are driven into the
ground, one on each side of the trench, and the plank fastened by
nails. (See Fig. 188.) An iron rod is preferable, since a stake
may disturb the ground sufficiently to cav£ the bank of the
trench. Usually the plank is allowed to rest directly on the
ground and to take its slope. But when stakes are driven on
each side, points are often marked on these stakes at the same
level, a definite and convenient integral number of feet above the
sewer invert. The plank is then nailed with its top edge on
these marks and therefore having its entire edge uniformly at
the level desired. With square iron pins a clamp screw is
used to fasten the plank to the pins, the grade having been
first marked on both pins. The plank in all cases should be
about 25 feet apart, although this may be increased to 50 feet on
a good grade. The sag of even a light line in 50 feet is quite
appreciable, and if the grade is low, one-eighth inch in 50 fcc-t,
the effect of the sag on the grade is very apparent. If offset
spikes have been driven every 25 feet and grade boards are
SURVEYING
239
placed by these spikes, the line is easily obtained by simply
measuring over with a tape from the spikes. Otherwise, a tran-
sit must be used either on the offset line to cut in intermediate
points or by setting up ahead to line in points directly on the grade
boards. Where the planks have not been set level, a vertical board
must be nailed onto the plank, one edge on line. This is readily
240
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
done by marking the line on the top edge, offsetting from the spike,
and swinging a vertical strip of wood around this point until by
a plumb bob it is vertical. The strip is then nailed fast and the
level used to mark a point on the strip, either cutting a small notch
in the corner of the strip or driving a small finishing nail in side-
ways at the right level. If the plank has been set at the right level
the vertical strip is not needed and the small nail is driven vertically
into the top of the plank, the line being found from offset measure-
ments or from direct transit alignment. The grade points being
thus established, a line is stretched from nail to nail, the invert
grade being a certain number of feet directly below.
WASHINGTON STREET,
at Center of Main St. Elevation, 16.470. Grade to Center St. 0.50.
Sta.
Surf
Elev.
B. S.
H. I.
F. S.
Sewer
Elev.
Depth
Below
Sur-
face.
Cut on
Grade
Stake.
H. I.
Rod
Set-
ting.
B. M.
2O 04
7 24
28 18
B. S.
o
23 7
4 5
16 47
7 2
8
6 17
2 64
20.94
4-25
2 ? O
4-1
1 6 505
7 7
8
27 II
2 5I<
4- 5o
24 4
16 72
7 7
8 &Q
12 3.0
+ <jc
24 Q
-7 •?
16.845
8 i
o
-jy
1-39
i 261?
I4-O
2^ 2
3. O
16 .07
8.2
9
I 14
+ 25
5
26.1
2 .1
i7-°95
9.0
9 & 10
{I QIC
M. H. + 3I
26. 5
I .7
17 .125
0 -4
IO
B. S.
0.015
4 .241?
4- so
27 2
I O
17 22
IO O
IO & 1 1
4 16
!4 15
> Ow
27.21
4 -AS
3-15
T P
27 21
3 71
3.0 02
O .07
I .
21 .27
4- 7C
27 8
31
1 7 345
IO 5
1 1
3O25
> /D
28 4
2 5
1 7 47
IO O
II & 12
!2 OO
4-25
2Q I
i .8
17 .505
II .5
12 & 13
>y
I .90
( I .775
4- 50
?o o
o o
17 72
12 3
1 1
* Q-775
o 65
• y
4-7C
2O 7
I 2
*/•/•'
I - Sic
110
I 3
o 525
M H 4-89
2O 3.
i 6
17 015
114
o>5
13 & 12
!O 455
l+O
28 4
2 5
1 7 .07
IO .4
12 & II
i-455
11 40
4- 25
27 4
7 C
18 OQ5
O 3
II & IO
•^
2 .40
{2 275
r *$
3 275
SURVEYING 241
The preceding shows a page of the author's notebook for setting
grades on Washington Street. At station o + 50, the bottom of
the rod, for an 8-foot cut has reached the top of the stake, and it
is necessary to decrease the rod reading and increase the length
of grade rod each by a foot. The cut to be used at each nail or
notch ought to be plainly marked on the stakes, especially where
two nails for two cuts are driven into the same stake. On steep
grades it is more rapid to use a transit, setting up on the sewer
line ahead of the work on solid ground, getting the elevation of the
instrument and its height above grade, and sighting on a point
down grade set at the same distance above grade. Intermediate
points are all set with the same rod reading, which is the distance
above grade less the distance desired for the grade line to be above
the invert grade.
It often happens that, using one bench mark in one block and
another in the next, some discrepancy is introduced into the grade
by the lack of agreement between bench marks, and it cannot
be too thoroughly urged that the bench marks be checked and
adjusted before any construction is begun.
Where the sewer is wide, or where bracing is used it is often
more convenient to nail the vertical grade boards to the bracing
instead of to the cross planks set for that purpose. Indeed it is
usually impossible with both sides of the trench lined with sheeting
to find any place to put the cross planks. The line on the pieces
of bracing is found just as before described, and the vertical strips
nailed on, and the grade line set — all as in the other case. The
only complication comes from the fact that the distance between
grade boards is irregular, that the bracing will settle as the
sheeting is driven, and so the grade points must be reset after
each driving. A soft bottom or caving banks will also carry
these grades out of position, and in quicksand the level must
be in constant use to revise the grades set even on the same
day.
The preparation of estimates is the remaining work to be con-
sidered in the way of surveying. Specifications generally read
that on or about the first of each month an estimate shall be made
242 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
of the work done by the contractor during the month just past.
This involves the measurement of the number of feet of pipe laid
and the number of cubic yards of excavation made both of earth
and rock, with the number of manholes, lampholes and other
appurtenances. The method of computing the excavation depends
on the specifications, but the most reasonable method is for the
specifications to prescribe the width of the trench that will be paid
for, in terms of the diameter of the pipe and of the depth of the
pipe invert. There should be room on the outside of the bell for
the workman's hands, with a small margin for alignment of the
pipe, a width of 12 inches more than the outside diameter of the
bells being a reasonable amount. The outside diameter of the
bell for a 12 -inch pipe is 17 inches, so that the trench width for a
i2-inch pipe should be 29 inches, the width to be used in estimating.
A 6-inch pipe would in the same way be estimated as 21 J inches
and a 24-inch pipe as 43 inches. These are minimum widths and
would probably be narrower than the trench would actually be
dug. This would be particularly applicable if sheeting were used,
since sheeting as ordinarily driven requires for one row 6 inches
additional on each side. Strictly, then, two feet should be added
where sheeting is to be used, and one foot where the trench is stable
without it. The specifications might therefore well differentiate
except for the opportunity of collusion with the contractor, who by
sticking up an occasional brace in the trench could secure a measure-
ment of an additional foot, the engineer being willing. It would
introduce, without collusion, an uncertainty, the contractor being
able to claim the additional foot whenever he decided sheeting
was necessary and placed, even if it were placed only for the
purpose of getting the extra measurement. It is better then,
in ground where sheeting will probably be used, to make the
additional width two feet, but where the ground is stable to
reduce this to one foot. This will hold to depths of about
10 feet. Below this two rows of sheeting would have to be driven,
so that the upper sheeting would require another foot of width,
adding three feet to the diameter of the outside of the bell. It is
probably fair also, since the cost of excavation increases with the
SURVEYING 243
depth, to assume this width to continue to the bottom of the
second row of sheeting, even though the actual width of the
trench is reduced. In rock, where no sheeting is needed, it is
simplest and at the same time is perfectly fair to assign some
width for all sizes of pipe up to 12 inches, the width varying
with the depth of the trench. In sedimentary rock this can
properly be made 3 feet for depths up to 8 or 10 feet. For
greater depths, that is 8 to 16 feet, 4^ feet and over 16 feet 6
feet are fair widths to be used in computation, irrespective of
the actual width of excavation, provided the specifications have
been so drawn. For sizes 12 to 24 inches, ij feet should be
added to the above. With the widths thus fixed by the speci-
fications, the computation of earth work consists of multiplying
this width by the length of trench excavated and by the depth.
The latter is usually taken from the profile.
Records of Y branches is another important part of the sur-
veying to be done during construction, and accuracy here is most
important. There are two methods in use. One is to measure
carefully from the nearest manhole up grade, afterwards giving
the proper station number to the Y with an R or L to indicate
which way it looks. The objection to this is that usually the
Y's are laid before the manhole is built, and the mason, in building
up the manhole, may bring the center of the cover, presumably
the center of the manhole, a foot or more out. Measurements,
therefore, taken from the assumed center before building, and the
cover center after building will not agree, and will make Y's hard
to find. A stake may be driven at the assumed center from which
measurements are made, or the offset spikes may be used to locate
the Y's, but the center of the cover, or the stake driven, must have
the correct station number determined or recorded before the
stationing of the Y's is made.
Another method of locating the Y's is by reference to side
lines of houses which are built near the Y. The record book
would then show a sketch as in Fig. 182 and to recover the Y's
the side line of the house shown is produced by eye to the middle of
the street or to a point about over the sewer pipe, and then the
244 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
proper distance measured. For greater certainty, strips of wood
such as edgings from a saw mill, or pieces of lath or pieces of
telegraph wire, are often left vertically in the trench at the Y so
that subsequent excavation may first find the upper end a few
inches below the ground surface and then follow down to the Y
with perfect certainty of finding it.
CHAPTER XVII.
TRENCHING.
ORDINARILY the methods used in laying pipe interest the
engineer only in so far as the safety of the pipe line and the water-
tightness of the joints are concerned. Since, however, it is some-
times required that the engineer act as contractor and immediately
supervise the work, some reference to this part of construction
may be made.
The variations in methods of trenching depend on the charac-
ter of the soil, on the depth of the trench, and on the amount and
depth of the ground water. The center line of the trench being
laid out, the side lines are marked with a pick, making grooves
in the surface, and the laborers are strung out to open up. The
width of the trench is determined by the diameter of the pipe, and
by the size of the sheeting, if used. The full outside width of an
8-inch sewer pipe at the hubs is 12 inches, and since room must
be left outside the hubs for making joints and for correcting the
alignment of the trench, a trench two feet wide is the least width to
be opened. If sheeting has to be used, assuming 2-inch sheeting
with 4-inch rangers, another foot is added, making a 3 -foot
opening, the narrowest where sheeting is used.
Some contractors, in order to minimize the danger of banks
caving, open the trench about 4 feet wide on top, narrowing to
1 8 inches at the bottom of an 8-foot trench, thus adding about
6 cubic feet of excavation per linear foot, or 22 cubic yards per
ico foot length, an additional cost of about $10.00. The sheeting
for 100 feet may be estimated to cost about $50.00, so that the
additional excavation is apparently justified, if the sloping banks
allow sheeting to be discarded. But practically any trench that
will stand with side slopes at such an angle will stand with ver-
245
246 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
tical sides and if sheeting is needed with the vertical trench it will
also be needed with the sloping sides. It is better, then, to have the
trench sides always truly vertical, and then, if bracing becomes
necessary, it can be put in.
In rock trenches, the width depends on the character of the
rock, on the depth of trench, and on the manner of excavation.
If the rock is granite, or igneous formation, without seams, blast-
ing will remove large irregular masses, and the width on top will
be nearly equal to the depth of the trench. In sedimentary rock,
the strata may be kept broken off so that the width is but little
more than that of an earth trench. In deep trenches, however, a
batter is gradually acquired, a trench 10 feet deep having a top
width of about 4 feet. If blasting is freely resorted to, with deep
holes and large charges, the width becomes greater than with
shallow holes and small charges, though it is possible without any
blasting, in soft sedimentary rock, to carry down a trench, with
picks, bull points, wedges, and hammers, and have a trench of about
the same width from top to bottom. If the soil is dry clay, or
dry clay loam, a trench can be carried down without any sheet-
ing, but a rain storm may flood the trench, soften the clay, and
cause the banks to fall in. A dry gravel, or sand without any clay
mixture, will need tight sheeting to hold up the banks. Wet clay,
or sand, will also need tight sheeting, and in the latter cases a con-
siderable pressure is exerted. A wet trench will always need sheet-
ing, which, in running sand, should be tongue-and-grooved, or
provided with splines.
In placing the sheeting, the trench is first excavated to a depth
of about three feet, or through the top soil and into the water-
bearing strata. Then the two rangers, usually 16 feet long, their
size dependent on the estimated pressure, and varying from 4 by
4-inch to 10 by 1 2-inch, are laid along the trench, one on each side.
Between each of these and the side of the trench are placed three
pieces of sheeting plank, vertical, one at each end and one in the
middle; the rangers are crowded back against the three planks and
cross struts, or braces, wedged in tightly and driven into place.
Then the trench sides are lined with vertical plank driven down
TRENCHING . 247
behind the rangers. When these are all in, the plank standing up
out of the trench 5 or 6 feet, they are driven down, one by one, as
fast as the trench is excavated, special care being taken to have the
sides dug vertical, and to keep the bottom ends of the plank back.
When the trench is about 7 feet deep, another set of rangers or
braces is put in to hold the bottom back, and the plank may be
driven two or three feet below these. About 12 feet is the maxi-
Fig. 189
mum depth for a trench with one row of sheeting. For a greater
depth an inner row must be driven with the first ranger of the
second sheeting holding the sheeting back against the bottom
ranger of the first sheeting. The excavation is narrowed up in
this way and the width of the top has to be increased on this
account. Figure 189 shows a perspective sketch of the sheeting
arranged as described. For ordinary sewer work 2-inch sheeting
248 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
is generally used, and for the braces patented screw posts are
frequently used. Where the driving is heavy, as in quicksand, 3
or 4-inch sheeting is often necessary, particularly if the sheeting
has to be driven ahead of the excavation. The bottoms of the
sheeting plank are usually sharpened on one corner and along
one side, so that the driving forces them sideways against the
last plank driven, and back against the bank. An iron cap is
often used to protect the ends of the plank from brooming; without
the caps, a wooden maul is essential; with the caps, particularly
when a hard wood block forms the head, an iron maul may be
used, or the plank may be driven with a small pile driver rigged
for the purpose.
In beginning excavation, it is often possible to reduce the labor
cost of the top three feet, where the width permits, by using horse
scrapers, ploughing and scraping, instead of picking and shoveling.
When the sheeting and bracing is in, hand work is necessary,
although machinery may be used for conveying the dirt. Machin-
ery used to facilitate sewer excavation is usually of the conveying
rather than of the excavating type, although rapid advances are
being made in the effectiveness of the latter. The former machines
are employed to raise loaded buckets from the bottom of a trench,
carry them the necessary distance along the trench, and dump the
contents wherever backfilling is desired. These machines are of
three types illustrated by the Carson Machine, the Lidgerwood
Machine, and the Moore (or Potter) Machine. The Carson
machine (see Figure 190) * consists of a series of "A" frames which
straddle the trench and are connected at the top by an "I" beam,
which serves as a track on which the travellers run. A hoisting
engine at one end of the track, with a return pulley at the other
end, supplies power by which the buckets attached to the travellers
can not only be moved back and forth, but also raised and lowered
from the trench. On account of the rental and maintenance
charges it is not profitable to use this machine until the trench is
over 8 feet deep, and a greater saving is effected the deeper the
trench, since the excavation costs, with the machine, very nearly the
1 From Catalogue of Carson Trench Machine Co.
bh
249
250 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
same amount per lineal foot of trench without regard to depth.
The back-filling is done without additional cost, since each load of
the machine, instead of being deposited on the bank, is carried to
the rear and dumped back into the trench. The cost of excava-
ting and refilling by these machines is, in deep trenches, much less
than the cost by hand work. The Carson catalogue gives the
following non-committal statement:
" The rate per cubic yard at which material has been handled by our machines is
a matter of much interest to contractors, and several customers have told us that they
have excavated and refilled sand, gravel, and clay trenches at rates varying from
fifteen to twenty-five cents per cubic yard. These figures, however, cannot be taken
as a basis for general estimates, as they were deduced from short observations only,
and do not include the cost of sheeting and bracing the trench, pumpage, loss and
wear on plant, tools, wastage of lumber, or miscellaneous expenses, all of which
items properly come under the head of excavation."
"Again, on the same trench there is often considerable difference in the amount
of work accomplished from day to day, and on a trench in one locality, where the
excavation was in damp sand, we have seen the "Bolt Machine " pushed to above
its rated daily capacity (three hundred cubic yards) by eight shovellers, yet on the
same trench further along, where clay was encountered, it took sixteen men, or four
to each tub, to enable the machine to handle one hundred and fifty cubic yards per
day. It may thus be seen that in one case each man shovelled nearly four yards per
hour, while in the other, less than one yard, due wholly to geological variation."
" As the ability of those using the machine to keep it in running order is another
important item, it can easily be seen that, while we can give figures as to the cost
per cubic yard on certain jobs, there is no safe general average, on account of
variation in soil and circumstances."
"We have had several contractors tell us that upon the same trench they found
that with our machine they could handle excavation at about one-third of the rate
per yard which it cost them in their experience previous to using machinery."
The Lidgerwood Cableway may be advantageously used where
the trench is too wide to span with the "A" frames of the Carson
Machine, or where for any reason the use of the frames is not
permissible. Figure igi1 shows the general arrangement. A
frame or tower at the rear carries a loose pulley and supports the
main cable, which is anchored somewhere in the rear of the frame.
The head end has its tower and anchor and has a hoisting engine
which moves the carriage back and forth with the tub. The usual
span is from 225 to 300 feet, so that the apparatus on a large sewer
does not have to be moved frequently. It is not difficult to move,
1 From Catalogue of Carson Trench Machine Co.
TRENCHING
a few hours sufficing to make the
necessary change. It is particularly
useful where blasting has to be
done, since the cable is not likely?^
' u
to be damaged, and nothing else is |
in danger. Then, too, in cities it is
possible to cover a large part of the
sewer, leaving open only that part
where excavation is being carried
on and that part where dumping is
done. It does not place any load
on the sides of the trench, either
from the excavated dirt, or from the
weight of the apparatus. There is
side motion enough so that material
can be placed on the side of the
trench, or material can be picked up
from the side and placed in the
bottom. It can even be used to
draw a plough or scraper and exca-
vate the trench without picks and
shovel. The objection to its use,
aside from the expense of installa-
tion, is that it can handle only one
thing at a time, and that it is pos-
sible, without good superintendence,
for the men filling a bucket at one
point in the trench to do a good deal
of waiting for their bucket to be
lifted. The machine is capableof mak-
ing 30 or 40 trips per hour, but without
good management it may stand idle
half the time. For wide trenches, for
rock cuts, and for excavation in quick-
sand, the cableway has manifest ad-
vantages over the Carson Machine.
252 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
The Moore Machine and the Potter Machine are similar to each
other, and partake of both of the characteristics of the machines
already described, that is, they require a rail laid on each side of
the trench to form a track as in the Carson Machine, and the opera-
tion is limited to one action at a time as in the Lidgerwood Machine.
Instead of providing an aerial cableway on which the single car
can move, a tower car, with a wheel at each corner post, is provided
to run on the track over the trench. The car is moved back and
forth by an endless rope attached to a hoisting engine at the front
end supported on wheels, and to a dead man at the rear end. The
Moore Machine has a carriage about 8 feet square and 15 feet
high, which carries a bucket man, who directs operations, and is re-
sponsible for the economical use of the time of the machine. The
velocity of motion attainable is high, a round trip of the carriage
being made in about one minute, including the time necessary to
raise the bucket from the trench and to dump its load. The
Potter Machine differs from the Moore in that the track on which
the carriage runs is elevated, requiring a more expensive track and
a less extensive carriage. They make a so-called surface track
car, which then in principle is practically the Moore Machine.
In a lawsuit between the two companies, tried before the United
States Circuit Court of Appeals, March 5, 1901, the Potter patents
were upheld, so that no danger is to be feared in using their
machines. Figure 192 shows a photograph1 of a Moore Machine
track in use at Binghamton, N.Y. The advantages of these
machines over the others is chiefly in the greater simplicity of the
machinery, most marked in the Moore Machine. The hoist is
simple and the engine so easily handled that any engineer can
operate it. These machines handle only one bucket or two
together, but they are more easily moved ahead, on account of the
lighter engines needed.
The matter of trenching in rock introduces uncertainty on
several points. The cost, the time, and the proper method of
excavation are all, in the minds of many engineers, indefinite and
uncertain. The kind of rock determines the character and fre-
1 Furnished by Thos. F. Moore, President Moore Machine Co.
TRENCHING
253
254 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
quency of the seams, which greatly affect the ease of excavation.
Limestones and shales have horizontal strata, usually with a hard
layer overlying a softer one. The vertical joints are regular and
close together, so that it is possible by the use of wedges, bars, and
picks to excavate in sedimentary rock without blasting. Igneous
rocks, on the other hand, have their joints so far apart that blasting
is necessary. For preparing the drill holes for blasting two methods
of drilling by hand are available, viz., by a churn drill, and by a
hammer drill.
The churn drill is a bar of iron about 6 feet long with steel bits
at both ends and weighted with a ball of iron in the middle. It is
a matter of some skill to start a hole with a churn drill, but once
started the drilling proceeds very rapidly. The weight of the
drill furnishes the necessary impact, and in sizes of drill rod over
three-quarters of an inch two or three men are required to lift
the weight of the rod.
Trautwine gives the following table for the rate of drilling vertical
holes .3 feet deep, one man drilling with a ij-inch bit.
Solid quartz 4 feet in 10 hours.
Tough horn blend 6 feet in 10 hours.
Granite 7.5 feet in 10 hours.
Limestone 8.5 feet in 10 hours.
Sandstone 9.5 feet in 10 hours.
In hammer drilling, one-hand drilling or two- or three-hand
drilling may be employed for holes up to 3 feet deep. One man»
with a 4§-pound hammer can usually drill small holes more cheaply
than when one man holds the drill and one or two men are striking.
In very hard rock, however, the latter may become cheaper.
Gillette says that with one man holding the drill and two men
striking, the depth of hole per man is as follows for a 6-foot hole:
( Granite 2$ feet in 10 hours.
Trap (basalt) T,\ fi-t-t in 10 hours.
Limestone 5$ fei-t in 10 hours.
In hard porphyry, the same author gives 2 feet to 3 feet per man
per day in holes 20 feet deep — one man holding and two striking;
TRENCHING 255
and in tough sandstone, one-hand drilling averaged about 6 feet
per day of 8 hours.
The spacing and depth of the holes, as well as the amount of
the charge, will depend on the methods employed and on the
specifications followed. The behavior of different kinds of rocks
is most confusing to the foreman who meets a new formation. In
soft rock and in sedimentary rock in thin layers, properly dis-
tributed blast holes will carry down a trench with regular and
smooth sides, but granite and igneous rocks are broken out in
irregular and uncertain lines, often loosening the dirt cover for
many feet on each side of the trench, if not actually filling the
trench with such dirt. Most specifications require excavation in
rock to be carried to a depth six inches below the bottom of the
pipe. In sedimentary rock, in thin layers, or when a thick layer
comes just above the excavation bottom, it is only necessary to
drill the blast holes to the bottom of the desired trench. But in
tough granites and thick, hard limestones, with strata disadvan-
tageously placed, it is frequently necessary to drill a foot below
the trench bottom in order to have every point of the bottom at
least 6 inches below the pipe. The usual practice of placing the
holes in a trench is to space them about three feet apart longitu-
dinally and transversely about the same distance. Thus, in a
trench 3 feet wide, two holes are drilled, one on each side of the
trench. In a trench 6 feet to 8 feet wide, three holes would be
used, one on each side and one in the middle. In a trench
14 feet wide, in Newark, N. J.1, five holes in each row were used,
the distance apart, longitudinally, of the rows being 4 feet. In soft
limestone the author has for trenches for 6-inch pipe not over
8 feet deep, particularly when only the bottom of the trench was
in rock, put down a single row of holes in the middle of the trench,
but a large amount of picking and hammering is always necessary
to finish up the work.
As to the depth of the hole, the necessity of avoiding accidents,
excessive noise, and rattling in nearby houses, limits the amount
of the charge. Usually the depth of the holes is made the same
1 Gillette.
256
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
as the distance between the holes, although in tough rock the depth
can with advantage be made greater than that distance. The
deeper the holes, the cheaper the work, since frequent changing of
drilling machines means loss of time. Gillette gives the follow-
ing (theoretical) table to show the effect of spacing of holes upon
the cost of excavation, tabulating the number of feet of hole
drilled per cubic yard excavated:
Distance Apart of Holes.
i
2
3
4
5
6
8
10
Cubic yards per foot
of hole
.04
.iq
.??
.CQ
.03
I 33
2 37
3 7O
Foot of hole per cubic
yard
27
6 8
30
I 7
I 08
7C
42
27
Since drilling costs from 10 cents to 50 cents per lineal foot, an
unwise or unforeseen combination of high cost drilling with shallow
holes near together, may very easily add from $1.00 to $3.00 to the
cost of a cubic yard of rock excavation. In loose seamy shale,
shallow holes near together are necessary to retain the force of the
explosion.
The kind of explosive which may be used varies from the slow
low-power black powder to the rapid high-power nitroglycerine,
the many forms of dynamite and high grade powder in use being
combinations of nitroglycerine and some absorbent. The slow
explosives are used to quarry dimension stone, to break out large
blocks, and to lift clay, hardpan, or shale. The rapid explo-
sives, on the other hand, are used in tough rock, particularly in
rock which is afterwards to be shoveled, and therefore needs to be
broken into small pieces. Rapid explosives are also used where
the rock is seamy, or cracked, when the slow-forming gases might
escape without shattering the rock. The most efficient blasting
is that in which both the depth and spacing of the holes and the
grade of the explosive are properly adjusted to the work in hand.
Further details of the methods of placing and firing the blast will
be found in the standard books on tunnelling and on rock
excavation.
CHAPTER XVIII.
ESTIMATES AND COSTS.
THE matter of making up a preliminary estimate of the cost of
sewer construction is usually most unsatisfactory for the engineer
himself, for the city officials, and for the contractors who may bid
on the work. Unless the engineer has had large experience in this
line of work and in the particular locality where the sewer system
is to be built, the estimates may vary largely from the actual cost
and from the bids, and if the cost must come within an appro-
priation, an estimate which is too small is certain to lead to future
difficulties. The variation in the estimate as a whole is caused by
the uncertainty of the estimates of the items of the work. Without
a series of borings or test pits the character of the soil and the
cost of its excavation is mere guesswork. For example, if
rock is found near the bottom of the trench, it will increase
the cost of the trench perhaps 50 cents per lineal foot. The
engineer's estimate may overlook the rock and count the
trench at perhaps 35 cents per running foot, whereas with
the rock he would estimate the cost of excavation at 80 cents
per lineal foot. Similarly, the cost of sheeting an ordinary trench
with single sheeting may be 15 cents per running foot, and while
the contractor may figure on sheeting, the engineer may omit that
cost. Again the amount of ground water to be encountered and
the consequent cost of pumping is most uncertain. The contractor
may figure that he will need a steam pump running day and night
at a daily cost (including rent of boiler and pump,) of $18.00 per
day, or an additional cost for pumping of 10 cents per lineal foot
of sewer. The estimated cost of excavation per lineal foot for a
small lateral sewer, then, may run from about 30 cents in good
ground to $1.25 in bad ground, the difference being all due to a
different opinion as to the amount of rock, amount of sheeting, and
amount of pumping.
257
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
The cost of excavation of earth in a trench is somewhat greater
than in a large open cut. The loosening must all be done by pick,
and some extra time is taken in trimming and preserving the line
and sides of the trench.
According to Gillette's figures revised to a scale of wages of $1.50
for 8 hours, the cost of loosening earth with a pick ranges from
1 1 cents per cubic yard for very easy earth to 15 cents per cubic
yard for very stiff clay or cemented gravel, and for average earth
the cost of picking may be taken at 5 cents per cubic yard. He
gives the cost of shoveling dirt which has been loosened at 13 cents
per cubic yard.
The cost of picking and shoveling, per cubic yard, then, from a
trench will be as follows, the cost of shoveling increasing also
with the kind of soil:
Picking.
Shoveling.
Total.
Easy earth, sand, and loam .
I £ CtS.
I3Cts
i4Acts.
Average earth
<T "
I< "
20 "
Tough clay
10 «
7 "
27 "
Hardpan
30 "
23 "
53 "
These figures are confirmed by data from different cities and are
generally applicable. The figures do not, however, include any
sheeting, bracing, pumping, foreman, contractor's profit, or office
expenses, and are for trenches 6 feet deep or less.
The cost of back-filling is usually, in estimates and bids, included
in the cost of excavation, and should therefore be added to the
figures given. The cheapest method of returning the dirt to a
trench is to scrape it back, the horses staying on the side of the
trench opposite the bank, the scraper having a rope attached.
In good soil, this may cost as little as ij cents per cubic yard if no
ramming is required. The cheapest hand-filling will cost without
ramming about 13 cents, or the bare cost of shoveling. A table
from the Technic,1 1896, gives the cost of back-filling clay, not
including ramming as 21 cents, 27 cents, 28 cents, and 34 cents, this
1 University of Illinois.
ESTIMATES AND COSTS 259
work apparently being very inefficient. However, if clay is dug
wet and piled, and allowed to dry, it becomes so hard that it has to
be picked or ploughed before it can be shoveled, which may
account for these high prices. The author, refilling trenches in
the fall, has found that a heavy frost adds decidedly to the cost of
refilling, in that the frozen crust has to be picked loose.
If the trench has to be consolidated by ramming or puddling,
something more has to be added to the cost. A common specifi-
cation is that there shall be one rammer to each shoveler employed
in back-filling, in which case the cost would be increased by
at least 13 cents per cubic yard. In city streets, where the con-
solidation is thorough and complete, and where the material is
clay rammed in four inch layers, the cost may be from two to
four times this amount, in fact there is no limit to the amount of
ramming that may be put into a clay back-fill. The following
summary may be given :
Excavation $o. 14^ to $0.53
Refilling ; ' oi£ to .30
Ramming, if done .13 to .60
Total $0.29 to $1.43
In gravel or sand, trenches may be well consolidated by refilling
into water. A firehose may be allowed to run as the refilling is in
progress, or the trench may be half filled before the water is turned
on. Or, again, the empty trench may be half filled with water
before the refilling is begun. It has been stated by an experi-
enced engineer that workmen will work noticeably faster in the
latter case on account of the gratification at hearing the splash
of the dirt.
In Vols. 27 and 28 of the periodical, " Engineering- Contracting/'
some complete analyses of the costs of trenching and back-filling
were given for Centerville and for Atlantic, both in the state of
Iowa. The figures were compiled by Mr. M. A. Hall, engineer in
charge, and are discussed at length in No. 20 of Vol. 27, and in
Nos. 8, 12, 16, and 24 of Vol. 28. For complete understanding of
the conditions the reader is referred to the periodical, and the
following summary is given chiefly to show how great a variation
260 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
exists in the cost of trenching and back-filling, even where the
conditions are apparently approximately uniform.
At Atlantic * on eighteen different parts of the work, the cost of
trenching per cubic yard varied from $0.131 for a lo-inch pipe in
a 6.6-foot trench to $0.347 for a 15-inch pipe in a i2.6-foot trench.
The back-filling was done chiefly by scrapers, and cost from
$0.017 for a lo-inch pipe in a p.i-foot trench to $0.066 for an
8-inch pipe in a 9.6-foot trench. The labor of pipe-laying cost
from $0.013 for a lo-inch pipe to $0.085 f°r a 1 5-inch pipe.
At Centerville 2 on thirty-six different parts of the work, the cost
of trenching per cubic yard varied from $0.239 f°r an 8-inch pipe
in a 6.6-foot trench to $0.864 f°r a 1 2-inch pipe in a 12. 2-foot
trench. The former was in yellow sand clay, easily spaded, and
the latter in dry, hard clay. The back-filling cost from $0.041 for
an 8-inch pipe in an 8.7 foot trench to $0.212 for a lo-inch pipe in
an 8.8-foot trench. The labor of pipe-laying cost from $0.017 for
an 8-inch pipe to $0.099 for a 1 2-inch pipe in a 13 -foot trench.
On thirty-nine other parts of the work at Centerville 3 the cost
of trenching per cubic yard varied from $0.173 f°r a 1 5-inch
pipe in a 5.6-foot trench to $1.04 for a 1 2-inch pipe in a 9.9-foot
trench. The former was in black loam and the latter was through
boulders in a wet ditch. The back-filling cost from $0.033 f°r
a i5-inch pipe in a 7.3-foot trench to $0.244 f°r an 8-inch pipe
in a 10. 5-foot trench, this latter being done in wet weather. The
labor of pipe-laying cost from $0.036 for a 15-inch pipe to $0.172
for a lo-inch pipe in a 1 2-foot trench.
On fifty-three other parts of the work 4 the cost of trenching
per cubic yard varied from $0.141 for a i5~inch pipe in a 7. 7-foot
trench to $0.639 for an 8-inch pipe in a 9.i-foot trench. The
former was in good easy digging and the latter was in wet
ground with some quicksand. The back-filling cost from $0.026
for a i2-inch pipe in an 8.2-foot trench to $0.187 for an 8-inch
pipe in a lo-foot trench, the latter being due to wet weather.
1 Engineering-Contracting, Vol. 27, page 218.
3 Engineering-Contracting, Vol. 28, page 114.
8 Loc. cit. page 170.
4 Loc. cit. page 223.
ESTIMATES AND COSTS 261
The labor cost of pipe-laying varied from $0.035 for a lo-inch pipe
to $0.124 f°r an 8-inch pipe in an 1 1.6-foot trench in hard clay.
The material in nearly all the above cases was clay, very
hard when dry, and very slippery when wet. The laborers worked
10 hours per day and labor is computed at the rate of 20 cents per
hour.
The excavation for the sewer work at South Bend referred to on
page 85, was done largely with a Potter Trench Machine. With
wages at 18.5 cents per hour for laborers, and 30 cents per hour
for the engineer on the machine, the cost of excavation per cubic
yard was given as follows:1
Pipe for sub-drain $0.047
Labor laying this pipe 0.050
Pumping water 0.065
Excavation and back-filling 0.400
Sheeting and shoring 0-150
Tools and general expenses 0.035
$0.747
This does not include the rent of the machine nor apparently the
cost of coal, which items would add nearly 50 per cent to the cost
given.
This same kind of machine was used for the deep trenching on
Lawrence Avenue, Chicago, where a sewer was built in 1907. 2
Here laborers were paid at the rate of 34 cents per hour and the
engineer on the machine 75 cents per hour. One-half ton of coal
was consumed each day by the machine and the rent of the machine
was given as $4.80 per day. The total daily expense was as
follows.
One engineer $ 6.00
One fireman 2.50
One carriage-man 2.50
One carriage-man 3.25
20 bottom men 55-°°
One dump-man 2.75
Foreman 3.50
Coal and rent 7.30
$8^80
1 Engineering-Contracting, Vol. 29, page 70.
2 Engineering-Contracting, Vol. 28, page 212.
262 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
On the basis that 175 cubic yards of material were excavated
each day, the cost would be about 47 cents per cubic yard, with no
allowance for sheeting.
For excavating a trench for a water pipe for the city of Greely,
Colorado, a Buckeye Traction digger was used with great success.1
The trench was 36 miles long, eight of it through a stratum of
gravel containing many stones, some of the gravel cemented
together. The material in the rest of the trench was clay, rather
hard but through which the machine dug with great ease. The
trench throughout was 30 inches wide and 4^ feet deep. The
description of the work allows $6.00 per day for repairs and
renewals, for interest and depreciation on the machine, and the
machine is said to have used on an average one ton of coal per day.
Four men were needed, the man running the machine receiving
$5 per day and the other three, $3 each. In the gravel, the machine
excavated from 600 to 1000 feet of trench; while in the clay as much
as 2500 feet was dug in one day of ten hours. The cost per cubic
yard for the work was as follows:
Engineer $0.02 1
Helpers 0.040
Coal 0.021
Plant 0.025
$0.107
The author has been informed that in excavating for water
pipes in the city of Corning, N.Y., a Chicago Sewer Excavator, of
the Chicago Municipal and Contracting Company averaged about
600 feet daily through a hard clay with many boulders, and that
the maximum distance excavated in any one day was 1200 feet, all
trenches five and a half feet deep.
If the trench is in rock, the following items are to be considered :
drilling, explosives, shoveling, and refilling. Gillette gives the
cost of hand drilling as follows: one man holding and two men
striking: granite, 83 cents; trap, 55 cents; limestone, 38 cents, per
lineal foot.
1 Engineering-Contracting, Vol. 29, page 103.
ESTIMATES AND COSTS 263
The cost of churn drilling is given by Gillette as follows: solid
quartz, 55 cents; granite, 30 cents; limestone, 26 cents; sandstone,
22 cents.
In Engineering- Contracting * are given some figures of the cost of
drilling in open cuts on the Grand Trunk Pacific Railroad. The
rock encountered was granite, trap, and diabase. Three men
drilling 10 to 14 foot holes in hornblende averaged 29 lineal feet
per day, or 23 cents per foot, labor being $2.25 per 10 hours. In
red granite, three men averaged 20 feet per day, or 34 cents per
foot. In trap and diabase, 18 feet per day was the average rate,
or the cost was 37 cents per foot. The cost of sharpening the drills
amounted to 9 cents per foot of hole drilled. The total cost there-
fore varied from 32 cents to 46 cents per foot. In shallower holes
the cost of drilling per foot increased, reaching 74 cents per foot
for shallow block holes in granite.
In the same volume2 are given similar costs for drilling in sand-
stone. Here, as before, three men constituted a gang and the
daily average varied from 12 to 17 feet per day with the different
gangs. The entire average cost of drilling per lineal foot, including
8J cents for sharpening drills, was 40.3 cents.
On page 199 are given additional values for the cost of drilling
into the mica schist in New York City. In the work referred to,
15 lineal feet was the average day's work, and the cost of drilling
alone was 40 cents per lineal foot.
If a steam drill is available these costs can be much reduced,
although the shallow depth of the holes in sewer trenches does not
bring out the full economy.
A steam drill operated by a driller and helper will drill holes as
follows : 3
In granite 45 to 50 feet in 10 hours.
In mica schist 50 to 60 feet in 10 hours.
In hard trap 40 feet in 10 hours.
In red sandstone 90 feet in 10 hours.
In limestone 70 feet in 10 hours.
1 Engineering-Contracting, Vol. 28, p. 301.
2 Engineering-Contracting, Vol. 28, p. 197.
3 Gillette.
264 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
The cost of "operation is given as follows:1
Driller and helper $4-75
Fireman 2.00
600 pounds coal .90
Water hauled 75
Hauling and sharpening bits 1.20
Repairs to drill and steam piping .75
Total for 10 hours $10.35
If more than one drill is to be run by the same boiler the cost of
fireman and coal will be distributed. But the rent or depreciation
of the boiler and drills should be added. If these are taken at
$3.00 per day the total cost would be $13.35. The cost then
will vary from 14 cents to 34 cents per lineal foot, much less than
the cost of hand drilling. In the open cut work of the Grand
Trunk Pacific Railroad above referred 'to the daily expense of
working one steam drill from a boiler, including repairs and all
incidental expenses, was $14.43, anc^ tne average number of feet
drilled daily was 30, making a cost, including sharpening, of 48
cents per foot. If two drills were run from the same boiler, the
engineer reports that this amount would be reduced by about 10
cents per foot.
The amount of explosive to be put into each hole varies with the
depth of the hole and the kind of rock. Estimates are usually
made on the basis of a certain amount per cubic yard of rock
loosened, less explosive being needed per hole the more closely
the holes are drilled. The amount of 40 per cent dynamite needed
per cubic yard for limestone varies from one-half to i\ pounds per
cubic yard, the larger amount being used in shallow holes in tough
rock. If we assume a trench 3 feet wide — holes staggered on
the center line and three feet deep — there will be 3 feet of hole
per cubic yard, costing about 75 cents for drilling. The dynamite
at 15 cents a pound will cost about 20 cents, or 95 cents for drilling
and explosive. About 5 cents more should be added for placing a
mat over the hole, or $1.00 per yard for loosening the stone. In
throwing the stone out of the trench the amount depends largely
on the size of the pieces, the large pieces taking a great deal of time,
1 Gillette.
ESTIMATES AND COSTS 265
especially if a bar has to be used to work loose any separate stones.
One man ought to throw out a cubic yard an hour, according to
Gillette, although loading stone into cars on the Chicago Drainage
Canal required an hour for three-quarters of a cubic yard. Not
less than 30 cents per cubic yard should be allowed for throwing
out and about 20 cents for refilling, making the labor cost 50 cents.
To this should be added cost of superintendence, office expenses,
and contractor's profit.
The cost of sheeting is determined by the amount of lumber
used, in the first instance and in succession, and by the cost of the
labor for placing it. It is seldom worth while to use anything
less than 2-inch material, although in gravel, when little driving
has to be done, i-inch stuff can often be used to advantage. A
trench 8 feet deep would have, if close sheeted, the following
lumber in 16 lineal feet:
Sheeting 2 inches X 8 feet X 16 feet X 2 = 648 B.M.
Rangers 4 inches X 6 inches X 16 feet X 4 = 128 B.M.
Braces 4 inches X 6 inches X 3 feet X 6 = 36 B.M.
Total for 16 feet = 812 B.M.
or 51 feet B.M. per running foot of trench.
The cost of placing lumber of this sort varies from $8.00 to
$15.00 per 1000, so that if lumber costs $30.00 per 1,000, the cost
in place will be about $40.00 and the sheeting driven would cost
20 cents per lineal foot; but the lumber would be used two or
more times so that 10 cents per lineal foot may be regarded as the
minimum cost of sheeting. Larger trenches should be estimated
in the same manner, although in wider trenches the braces must
be heavier, 10 by 12 being sometimes necessary. With care, the
rangers and braces may be used three or even four times, but
the sheeting seldom more than twice. For comparison the follow-
ing figures are given.
At Peoria, 111.,1 in a trench 13 feet wide by 45 feet deep, the
labor cost of sheeting was $3.00 per lineal foot when work was all
done by hand, and $2.08 per foot when steam power was used for
driving and pulling the sheeting.
1 Engineering News, Vol. 37, p. 50.
266 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
There were about 230 feet B.M. per lineal foot, or the cost of
placing and pulling the sheeting was about $13.00 in the first case
and about $9.00 in the second case per 1000 feet B.M.
Gillette says that small trenches 8 to 16 feet deep in sand cost
from 10 to 25 cents per lineal foot for labor of sheeting with 2 by 8
inch hemlock.
The cost of excavation in tunnels exceeds and bears but little
relation to the cost of excavation in open cut. The laborers work
at a disadvantage, the cost of spoiling the material is large, and the
cost of sheeting or timbering is heavy. The following examples
are given as a guide for estimates of this kind.
At St. Louis, Mo., for a brick sewer 30 by 42 inches, with 9
inches of brickwork, the cost per cubic yard was as follows, 1 the
material being a plastic clay which would drop out in the arch
following the shovel:
Foreman at 50 cents $0.225
Bottommen at 50 cents 571
Laborers at 30 cents 1.946
Carpenters at 50 cents 359
Labor, timbering 161
Timber at $20 381
Watchman at 1 7 J cents 079
Wasting dirt, 585 loads at $i .506
$4.228
For the same sewer 880 cubic yards were in rock tunnel and the
cost of this was given as follows:
Foreman at 50 cents $0.568
Bottommen at 50 cents J-477
Laborers at 30 cents 3-402
Engineer at 50 cents 909
Blacksmith 070
Watchman at 17$ cents 318
Dynamite at 15 cents per pound 682
Caps and fuse 030
Wasting dirt, 445 loads at $i .500
$7.956
The rock was a stratified limestone, irregular and gnarly. It
varied in hardness in some places to a flinty appearance. No
1 Engineering Contracting, Vol. 28, p. 28.
ESTIMATES AND COSTS 267
charge has been made in the above costs for plant, coal, oil or
depreciation ; nor are office expenses or insurance included.
In Syracuse, in the tunnel sewer, which was built in clay rock with
some slate, most of which was thrown down by blasting, the costs
are given as follows : * The entire cost of the tunnel in the first sec-
tion was $6.68 per cubic yard, of which $1.67 was for sheeting,
almost equally divided between labor and material. The size of
the opening was 6 feet wide by 7 feet 9 inches high. In the second
section, where the material was chiefly a gypsum rock of a flinty
nature, and where there was a large amount of water, the cost
of excavation, exclusive of sheeting, was $7.00 per cubic yard,
the additional cost of sheeting being $.66 for lumber and $.40
for labor. In the third section2 the material was clay and easily
handled. The total cost of excavation is given as $4.21 per cubic
yard, of which $1.28 was for sheeting, $.84 for labor, and $.44 for
material.
In driving a small tunnel in Colorado,3 the material being like
ordinary granite and the size of the tunnel being 7 feet high by
4.5 feet wide, the costs per cubic yard were given as follows:
Sec. i.
Sec. 2.
Machine men at $4
$0.0$
$1 .40
^Machine helpers at $3
78
Trammers at $3 . .
8
7O
Pipe and track men at $3
04
.07
Operating machines .
.87
.6<
General tramming cost
.02
.02
Explosives
i 3?
I IO
Pipe and track
27
•?r
Hoisting . ....
.48
q7
Supplies . . .
OI
OI
48
r 7
Total
%.7?
%44
The cost of pipe is determined by referring to the list price issued
by the Eastern or Western Pipe Manufacturing Association and
1 Engineering-Contracting, Vol. 26, p. 139.
2 Loc. cit., page 196.
3 Engineering-Contracting, Vol. 26, p. 6.
268
SEWER CONSTRUCTION
then deducting the proper discount. The following are the list
prices referred to:
Standard Sewer Pipe.
Double Strength Pipe.
Diameter.
Weight
per Foot.
Price per
Foot.
Diameter.
Weight
per Foot.
Price per
Foot.
6
Ibs.
1C
$0 .70
Ibs.
8
2 3
CQ
28
60
10
•7C
7C.
12
A-l
I OO
15
60
i-35
15
75
Si -35
18
85
1.70
18
118
1.70
20
IOO
2.25
20
138
2.25
24
140
3-25
24
190
3-25
3°
252
5-5°
3°
290
5-5°
36
35°
7.00
36
375
7.00
The discount (1907) is about 75 per cent for standard pipe, so
that 8-inch pipe, for example, listed at 50 cents will actually cost
I2| cents delivered. If deep and wide socket pipe are desired,
the discount is about 70 per cent, or the cost per foot is 15 cents.
If double strength pipe is wanted, the discount is about 60 per cent,
or the cost is 20 cents per foot. In estimating the cost of the pipe
laid, the cost of hauling must not be overlooked, the estimate on
this being made by the distance hauled and the weight as given in
the table. A team will walk on fairly level ground at the rate of
2j miles per hour, not including time for loading or unloading,
nor time taken for resting or hills, which in summer is frequently
extravagant. On a long hill, for example, the author has often seen
a hired team take an hour to go up a half-mile hill on a 10 per cent
grade. The cost of lowering the pipe into the trench, placing it
and packing the cement into the joint may be estimated from
figures already given on page 260. The amount of cement and
sand needed for making the joints can be determined from the
following table,1 and, knowing the cost of both, the cost of the joints
is easily obtained.
1 From Engineering News.
ESTIMATES AND COSTS
269
-iJ
Proportions Based on Prof. Baker's Table of Material
8,
&
•SI I
for One Cubic Yard of Mortar, viz. :
&
"o
£
•8
1
«
\l\
a « J
7.14
6.43
4.16 | 3.74
0.58
2.85
2.57
0.80
rt
5
«i
Ji
"o
"o.
1
s §
•S^i?
Neat Cement.
One Cement to One
Sand.
One Cement to Two
Sand.
!
.«
!S
H
a
K* 0 «
c3 ^
Bbls.
Port.
Bbls.
Ros.
Bbls.
Port.
Bbls.
Ros.
Cu.
Yds.
Sand.
Bbls.
Port.
Bbls.
Ros.
Cu.
Yds.
Sand.
Standard.
3
i
1
1
o .142
I .01
0.91
0-59
0-53
O .08
0.4
0.36
0 .11
4
i
0.174
1.24
I .1
0.7
o-7
0 .1
0-5
°-5
0 .1
5
f
o .252
1.8
1.6
I .1
0.9
O .2
°-7
0.7
0 .2
6
1
o .290
2 .1
1.9
I .2
i .1
0 .2
0.8
°-7
0 .2
8
0-437
3-i
2.8
1.8
1.6
°-3
i-3
i .1
0.4
9
Ji
j
0.514
3.7
3-3
2 .1
1.9
°-3
i-5
J-3
0.4
10
|
0.618
4.4
4.0
2.6
2-3
0.4
1.8
1.6
°-5
12
2
"|
1.056
7-5
6.8
4-4
4-o
0.6
3-0
2-7
0.9
15
af
1.487
10 .6
9.6
6.2
5-6
0.9
4-2
3-8
I .2
18
j
aj
1.912
13-7
12.3
8.0
7-2
i .1
5-5
4.9
i-5
20
af
2-399
17.1
15-4
10 .0
9.0
1-4
6.8
6.2
i .9
24
a|
3-347
23-9
21-5
13.9
12 -5
1.9
9-5
8.6
2-7
3°
2
3
5-495
39-2
35-3
22.9
20 .6
3-2
iS-7
14.1
4-4
Deep and Wide Socket.
6
1
af
f
0-585
4-2
3-8
2.4
2 .2
°-3
i-7
i-5
°-5
8
«
af
....
0.907
6-5
5-8
3.8
3-4
0-5
2.6
2-3
o-7
10
I
al
....
i -134
8.1
7-3
4.7
4.2
o-7
3-2
2-9
o-9
12
I
3
1-594
ii .4
10.3
6.6
6.0
0.9
4-5
4-i
1-3
15
if
3f
2.172
J5-5
14 .0
9.0
8.1
1-3
6.2
5-6
i-7
18
Ji
3f
....
2 .843
20.3
18.3
ii .8
10 .6
i-7
8.!
7-3
2-3
20
!§
3l
....
3.466
24.8
22.3
14.4
13-0
2 .O
9-9
8.9
2.8
24
If
4
4-797
34-3
30.8
20 .O
17.9
2.8
13-7
12.3
3-8
Double Strength.
IS
i}
a}
\
1.796
12.8
ii. 6
7-5
6-7
I .0
5-i
4-6
1-4
18
l|
af
2.499
17.8
16.1
10.4
9-4
I .5
7-i
6.4
2 .0
20
!§
3
....
3.162
22.6
20.3
13.2
ii. 8
i .8
9.0
8.1
2 .5
24
2
3i
....
4.801
34-3
3° -9
20 .0
18.0
2.8
13-7
12.3
3-8
3°
a*
4
|
9-095
64.9
58.5
37-8
34-0
5-3
25-9
23.4
7-3
B. & P. Standard.
27
aj
4
|
7.847
56.0
5°-5
32.6
29.4
4-6
22 .4
2O .2
6-3
3°
af
4
£
10.183
72.7
65-5
42.4
38.1
5-9
29 .0
26.2
8.2
33
a)
4i
I
13 -541
96.7
87.1
56.3
50 .6
7-9
38.6
34-8
10.8
36
a|
5
I
1 6 .007
174.3
102 .9
66.6
59-9
9-3
45-6
41 .1
12.8
B. & P. Double Strength.
27
af
4
J
8-333
59-5
53-6
34-7
31.2
4.8
23-8
24-4
6-7
3°
aj
4
|
11 -371
81.2
73 -1
47-3
42.5
6.6
32-4
29.2
9.1
33
aj
4i
I
14 -943
106.7
96 .1
62.2
55-9
8-7
42 .6
38.4
12 .0
36
af
5
I
'7-57I
125-5
113.0
73-i
65-7
IO .2
50.1
45-2
I4.I
2/0 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
The cost of brickwork in sewer construction must be esti-
mated from the unit prices of the material and labor, the amount
of brickwork per lineal foot of sewer having already been given
on page 34. The cost of brick runs from $8.00 to $12.00 per
thousand for ordinary building brick, and from $16.00 to $20.00
per thousand for paving brick. They must be hauled to the
sewer, 1000 brick being a load on level ground over good roads,
and 500 brick a load on average dirt roads. The added cost per
thousand, therefore, on a dirt road is about 80 cents per mile of
haul, to which should be added the time lost on each trip while
waiting for loading and unloading — or 50 cents more — if the
wait is half an hour at each end and the haul is a mile. In lay-
ing, a good sewer-brick mason will lay 2000 to 3000 brick in 8
hours, instead of about a thousand as in house-laying. Gillette
notes a case of a man laying 600 brick an hour, but this is too
many for an average or an estimate.
From three-tenths to four-tenths of a cubic yard of mortar are
needed for each cubic yard of brickwork, and the materials needed
for each yard of mortar are given in the table on page 269. 1
The cost of cement and of sand will vary in different places,
and would be locally determined in preparing an estimate as fol-
lows, the supposed sewer being 4 feet diameter, two rings thick:
Brick — 4 feet dia. 2 ring at .415 cubic yard per foot X $10.00 = $5.00
Hauling, $1.30 per 500 brick, or i cubic yard = 1.08
Mortar .17 cubic yard requires
.39 barrel cement at $2.00 $0.78
.17 cubic yard sand at $1.00 17
-95
Labor fc day of mason at $4.80 96
Labor $ day of helper at 1.75 70
1.66
Centers cost of 100 feet used ten times, $120.00, or about
12 cents per foot -15
Total cost per cubic yard = 8.84
Total cost per lineal foot = $8.84 X f&2 = 7-34
In shallow trenches two laborers may be able to supply two
masons, or three laborers may supply two masons, but it is always
wise to estimate for and expect a large number of helpers in sewer
1 See also Baker's "Masonry Construction."
ESTIMATES AND COSTS
work. The brick have to be lowered by hand and often carried
by hand in the bottom of the trench. The mortar board has to
be frequently shifted and its position is usually hard to reach, and
since the mason should not be expected to stop his work, it is
necessary to provide helpers in abundance.
A small brick egg-shaped sewer was built in Worcester, Mass., in
1905 1 in a trench whose average depth was 9.8 feet. The soil was
gravel, and tight sheeting was used throughout. The invert of
the sewer was 8-inch brickwork and the arch was 4-inch work,
plastered outside with a i-inch coat of cement mortar. The brick
cost $9.20 per 1000 and the cement $1.55 to $1.75 per barrel; the
masons were paid 70 cents per hour and the helpers 30 cents.
There were 57,200 brick used, and the total cost of masons and
helpers was $375.20, or $6.56 per 1000 brick, equivalent to $3.33
per cubic yard of brickwork.
At St. Louis, in 1906-1907, a 30-inch by 42-inch brick sewer
was built in I3th Street.2 The work was in tunnel and the cost of
the brickwork might be expected to be greater than at Worcester;
it was, in fact, considerably less. The thickness of the ring was
9 inches, and some additional brickwork was used to fill in the open
spaces above the arch. The brick cost $9.00 per 1000 and the
cement $1.80 per barrel; the masons were paid $1.00 per hour
and the helpers 30 cents. There were 340,000 brick used and the
total cost of masons and helpers was $1900.00, or $5.58 per 1000
brick, equivalent to $2.46 per cubic yard of brickwork. The
cost of the masonry complete was given as $7.99 per cubic
yard.
The cost of concrete in sewer work is high because it is often
difficult to place and because, in thin layers, the cost of forms
and finishing is a large proportion of the total. The cost
of materials and the labor cost of mixing are easily estimated,
the amount of each ingredient being computed separately as
follows :
Assume a i : 2 : 5 concrete — cement at $2.00 per barrel, sand
1 Engineering-Contracting, Vol. 27, p. 28.
2 Engineering-Contracting, Vol. 28, p. 28.
2/2 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
at Si. oo per cubic yard, and broken stone at $1.50 per cubic yard.
The cost per cubic yard of concrete then is :
1.3 barrels cement at $2.00 $2.60
.36 cubic yard sand at $1.00 36
.90 cubic yard stone at $1.50 1.35
Mixing the concrete by hand 75
$5.06
This is a fair price for the concrete mixed and ready to be put
in place. If gravel and sand are used, in the same combination in
which they come from the bank, the cost of sand and stone, $1.71,
may, under favorable conditions, be cut in two, reducing the cost
of the mixed concrete to $4.20. If a mixing machine is used the
cost of mixing per cubic yard may be as little as 5 cents, with
10 cents added for interest and depreciation, making the cost
of the gravel concrete, machine mixed, $3.60 per cubic yard.
The cost of carrying the concrete to the place where it is required,
the cost of ramming into place, and the costs of forms are uncertain
and difficult to estimate, although they form a large part of the
total cost of the concrete.
Shoveling l into wheelbarrows will cost 16 cents per cubic yard.
The cost of wheeling is i cent for every 25 feet + 4 cents for lost
time, or 21 cents if the haul is 25 feet and 24 cents for 100 feet.
Dumping down a chute which has to be frequently moved will
cost at least 8 cents per cubic yard, and additional shoveling of the
concrete at the foot of the chute will cost 10 cents per cubic yard,
adding to the cost given above of $5.06, 42 cents, or a total of
$5.48 for the concrete in place, a cost which may be modified in
the several items by the judgment of the engineer.
The cost of forms is largely influenced by the cleverness of the
constructor. If the ground is stable there need be no forms for
the invert, only frames for the screed boards every 8 feet. The
centers for the arch can be used over and over, and it is necessary
to build enough to last for that time during which the arch must
be supported, usually a length equal to two days' work. The
1 These estimates are taken from Gillette.
ESTIMATES AND COSTS 273
quantity of lumber needed may be computed at the local price per
1000, with about $10.00 per 1000 added for carpenter work.
At Wilmington, Del., the cost of forms for a concrete-steel
sewer, ranging from 9 feet 3 inches to 6 feet 6 inches radius, through
the 1800 lineal feet of sewer, was 8.2 cents per cubic yard of con-
crete laid, and the cost of setting the forms was 4.5 cents per cubic
yard, or a total of only 12.7 cents per cubic yard, a very small
amount.
In building a 5 -foot concrete steel conduit near Newark, N.J.,
the cost of labor in merely moving the forms is given at 60 cents
per cubic yard. If no outside forms are used on the arch, a good
deal of material is often wasted by having the thickness greater
than was intended, so that it may be cheaper to provide some
outside forms even if these are only boards held out from the sides
of the trench by stakes or props.
In the construction of the Harlem Creek sewer in St. Louis, in
I906,1 about 1600 cubic yards of concrete were used in connection
with 43 tons of steel rods. The sewer is 29 feet wide by 18.6 feet
high and the thickness of the arch ring is thirty inches. The
concrete was cement, sand, and broken limestone in the pro-
portions of i : 3 : 6 for the invert and 1:2:5 f°r tne arch.
It was machine mixed in cube mixers. The cement cost
$1.80 per barrel, the sand $0.75 per cubic yard, the broken stone
$1.00 per cubic yard, and the steel 2 cents per pound. Wages ran
from 17.5 cents for the poorest to 30 cents for the best labor per
hour. The cost of the concrete per cubic yard was as follows:
1.30 barrels cement at $1.80 $2.34
0.44 cubic yard sand at 75 cents 33
i cubic yard broken stone at $i i.oo
55 pounds steel at 2 cents i.io
Mixing and placing concrete 74
Forms, labor and material 1.25
Placing steel at 0.2 cent per pound n
Bending steel at 0.06 cent per pound 03
Moving forms 25
$7-i5
1 Engineering-Contracting, Vol. 27, p. 76.
274 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
The figures given do not include interest or depreciation on the
extensive plant which was installed nor the cost of running the
plant. The latter item was $2000 for this part of the work, or $1.25
per cubic yard if this cost is distributed over the 1600 yards. This
is not accurate, however, as the plant was used for purposes of
excavation as well as for building the masonry.
At South Bend, Ind., where a half mile of 66-inch reinforced
concrete sewer was built in 1906, already described on page 85,
the concrete was made with gravel and mixed in a Smith mixer.1
The disposition of the force of men mixing and placing concrete
and the wages were as follows:
Six wheelers at 18.5 cents per hour.
One mixer at 22.5 cents per hour.
One dumper at 18.5 cents per hour.
Four placers at 22.5 cents per hour.
The cost of the concrete per cubic yard was given as follows:
Cost of —
gravel $0.774
sand 36
cement 1.50
steel rods 84
labor, placing and mixing concrete 1.094
forms, templates, etc 589
moving forms, templates, etc 757
finishing, plastering, etc 639
tools and general expenses .841
$7-395
During the summer of 1906, Mr. O. P. Chamberlain built a
number of concrete culverts, using 4 foot concrete pipes molded
in the form of hollow cylinders with square ends. The pipes were
6 inches thick and were made of limestone screenings and crushed
limestone that had passed through a f -inch screen and was caught
on a J-inch screen. The forms were of wood, the inner form
having a wedge-shaped loose stave which could be withdrawn after
the concrete had set. The outer form was in two parts, held
together by pins which could be removed to separate the forms.2
1 Engineering-Contracting, Vol. 26, p. 49.
2 Engineering-Contracting, Vol. 27, p. 68.
ESTIMATES AND COSTS 275
Mr. Chamberlain estimates the cost of molding the four-foot pipes
as follows:
Depreciation of forms, 2 per cent of $40 • $0.80
i.i cubic yards stone and screenings at $1.85 2.04
0.8 barrel cement at $2.10 1.68
10 hours labor at 28 cents 2.80
$7-32
There were 1.05 cubic yards per length of pipe, or the cost of con-
crete molded in the form of pipe was $7.00 per cubic yard.
The cost of manholes must be estimated from the separate
parts. It takes a yard of concrete for the bottom, i.e., a barrel and
a third of cement, or usually five bags, a yard of broken stone,
and a half yard of sand, or a yard of gravel containing the proper
amount of sand. The brick side walls are laid by a mason who
ought to lay 1000 brick in a day of 8 hours, a manhole containing
about 175 brick in each vertical foot or 1000 brick for 6 feet
depth. The brick, mortar, and labor make the cost of the brick-
work in a 6-foot manhole about $16.00, and the frame and cover
will cost from if cents to 3 cents per pound, or about $8.00. The
total cost then is, for a 6-foot manhole, approximately:
Bottom $ 4.00
Sides 16.00
Cover 8.00
$28.00
For deeper manholes add $3.00 per lineal foot of depth greater
than 6 feet.
The cost of cast iron and steel is usually estimated at a certain
price per pound, the cost of shop work being added to the cost of
the raw material. Pig iron is quoted at about $20.00 per ton, and
any foundry has always to meet that cost plus the cost of the labor
put on the castings. The cost of the latter depends on the cost
of the pattern in proportion to the cost of the castings, on the size
and weight of each separate casting, and on the intricacy or sim-
plicity of the casting itself. For example, the patterns for a cast-
iron gate might easily cost, for labor alone, $25, while the gate
276 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
itself might weigh only 150 pounds and cost about $5.00. The
apparent cost of the iron involved, therefore, would be the quotient
of 25 plus 5, or 30, divided by 150, or 20 cents per pound. Patterns
for single castings, therefore, ought to be avoided in the interests
of economy, and where required the design should be very simple,
without curved lines or surfaces and the pattern adapted to rapid
carpenter work.
Then again the cost of molding per pound is less on large,
heavy castings than on small and light ones. The hand labor
involved in repeated moldings of a small casting of one pound,
making up one ton, for example, is much greater than in a single
length of water pipe which weighs a ton in one piece. Again, a
simple rectangular solid can be molded more quickly and cheaply
than a complicated assemblage of pieces requiring cores to be
made and several flasks to be used to form the required casting.
All these points, as well as the degree of finish called for, affect
the cost per pound, and the estimated cost of the finished casting
will vary between 2 cents per pound on large orders of simple cast-
ings to 10 cents, or even 20 cents per pound, on single and elaborate
castings. This does not include machine finishing, which must be
liberally allowed for in the time of the machinist at 50 cents per
hour. The ordinary price for manhole covers varies from 2 to
4 cents per pound, depending on the size of the order, the form of
the section, and the finish required.
Cast iron in the form of pipes costs about 2 cents per pound
delivered at the work. But the current price of pipe should always
be looked up (Engineering News publishes the current prices of
steel and iron regularly each month), and the cost of freight,
hauling and laying added.
Trautwine gives careful analyses of the cost of laying cast iron
pipe, as does also Gillette, to whom the reader is referred for
greater detail.
The cost of steel used in concrete reinforcement should also be
carefully investigated for each estimate. Its cost is usually not
far from 2 cents per pound delivered at the work, and the cost of
placing is to be added. Expanded metal is sold by the square
ESTIMATES AND COSTS
277
foot, and the same necessity for market quotations exists in this
case. Five cents per square foot will ordinarily pay for and place
this material.
The cost of flush tanks should be divided into the cost of the
manhole and the cost of the discharging apparatus. The cost of
the manhole has already been discussed. The cost of the Miller
Automatic Siphon, which may be taken as a fair type of discharg-
ing apparatus, is given in the following table, about 20 per cent
discount being allowed (1906).
Size and Capacity of Tanks.
Water Re-
Price f. o. b.
Diameter
of Siphon,
Inches.
of Sewer,
Inches.
Diameter,
Feet.
Discharg-
ing Depth,
Discharg-
ing Ca-
pacity,
quired to Fill
100 Lineal
Feet of Sewer,
Cubic Feet.
Chicago,
Siphons of
Standard
Length.
Cubic Feet.
3
4- 6
2
18
4-5
8.7- 20
$20 .00
5
6- 8
4
28
25
20~ 35
26 .00
6
8-10
4*
37
42
35- 55
30 .00
8
12-15
5
42
65
80-122
40 .00
The cost of a flush tank, therefore, equipped with a Miller siphon
and proper water connection, will be from $50.00 upward. If the
flush tank is fitted with a water supply faucet and a flap valve to
be operated by hand, this cost may be reduced to about $10.00
more than the cost of the manhole.
The amount of the contractor's profit should be added in making
the estimate, and also a sum for contingencies. The percentage
for profit ought to be different on material and on labor. If the
contract is a large one, involving a large amount of material, and
but little labor to place it, as, for example, where the pipe are
estimated separately, a profit of from 5 per cent to 10 per cent is
proper and ample. But when the contract is for labor alone, as
in trenching, the percentage ought to be not less than 15 per cent,
and with uncertain ground even more than this. Contingencies
are usually estimated at a certain percentage of the entire estimate,
although it is more reasonable to base the contingencies on that
part of the work only where contingencies may arise. Ten per cent
278 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
is an average percentage for the purpose, being less when the
conditions are certainly known and more when uncertainties of
soil, of water, and of weather will seriously affect the cost of the
work.
The cost of engineering is difficult to predict. About 6 per cent
of the estimated cost of the work is commonly supposed to cover
the cost of necessary surveys, design, superintendence, and con-
struction. With a sewer system costing $100,000 the $6,000, or
6 per cent, would then be divided up as follows:
Surveys and maps — 25 miles of street at $30 $ 750.00
Design, including detail plans 1500.00
General superintendence 2000.00
Inspection and office work 1750.00
$6000.00
CHAPTER XIX.
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS.
SIDE by side with the preparation of the detail plans should go
the drawing up of the specifications, which are the verbal descrip-
tion of the plans, and along with the construction of the work
must go the interpretation and application of those specifica-
tions. Much has been written on this subject, and Johnson's
"Specifications" or Wait's " Engineering Jurisprudence" or
Waddell and Wait's "Specifications and Contracts" may be
referred to for detailed discussion of the various questions which
may arise both as to the form of the contract and specification
clauses and as to their effect upon the progress of the work
which they control. There is a growing tendency to make
specification clauses more definite and to give up the time-hon-
ored phrase, so comforting to the engineer who was preparing
to direct work of the details of which he knew little or nothing,
that the work was to be done "according to the satisfaction of
the engineer." A capable engineer knows before the work
begins exactly what he wishes and how the work should be
done, and the substitution of exact definition for the former
uncertainty is certainly desirable. One exception is made when-
ever the contract is designed to allow the contractor full liberty
of method and material so long as the results desired are
gained, and then the result must be properly obtained to the
satisfaction of the engineer.
The form of contract and specification following is one that
has been used by the author for several pieces of work and
which has stood the test of dishonest contractors and of unrea-
sonable lawsuits. It is not perfect, as the author himself recog-
nizes and as he has indicated by some of the comments, but it
will serve as a guide to the inexperienced engineer who is under-
taking for the first time to prepare such a document for work
279
280 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
under his direction. It would be wise, after it has been carefully
written out, to have it submitted first to a local attorney to be
sure that it conforms to all the local legal requirements, and second
to a competent engineer experienced in municipal or sanitary
work. Each clause should be carefully scrutinized before its
incorporation to make sure that it applies to the work in hand,
that it will secure just the results desired, and that it conforms
to local usage. The specific items for the contractor's unit prices
are not given and care must be taken that none be omitted from
Section O, and the specification clauses should be carefully
compared with those items to make sure that the description of
each item is incorporated in the specifications.
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS.
FOR BUILDING SECTION OF THE SEWERAGE SYSTEM OF THE
CITY OF - — , — ,
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this
day of in the year one thousand nine hundred
and , by and between the Board of Sewer Commis-
sioners of the City of , party of the first part, and
party. ... of the second part,
WITNESSETH, That the parties to these presents, each in consider-
ation of the undertakings, promises, and agreements on the part of the
other herein contained, have undertaken, promised and agreed, and
do hereby undertake, promise and agree, the party of the first part, for
themselves, their successors and assigns, and the party. .. .of the
second part .... for and heirs, executors and
administrators as follows:
This introductory clause is the legal form which is generally
used. The "party of the first part" is conventionally applied
to the person who contracts to have performed the subject-
matter of the contract, and " the party of the second part " is
applied to the person agreeing to perform the contract. These
terms are frequently omitted and in the body of the contract
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 281
the names or titles of the parties are substituted, or reference is
made by such terms as " said contractor/7 " said city," etc.
The word " assigns " should be omitted if the contract con-
tains a clause prohibiting an assignment, or if the contract is
for special work in the successful prosecution of which the
personal skill and experience of the contractor are considered
essential.
That whenever and wherever in this agreement the word "Board"
or a pronoun in the place of it is used, the same is understood to refer
to the Board of Sewer Commissioners of the City of , and
refers to and designates the parties of the first part to this agreement.
That whenever the word "Engineer" is used in these specifications
or in this contract, it refers to the Engineer employed by the Board for
the special purpose of directing and having in charge the work, the
said Engineer acting either directly or through any assistant or
inspector in immediate charge of a portion of the work, limited by the
particular duties intrusted to him.
That whenever the word " Contractor " or a pronoun in the place
of it is used, the same shall be taken and deemed to mean and
intend the party or parties of the second part to this agreement.
These three clauses are generally inserted, it being considered
prudent to explain who is intended to be included within the
terms.
A. The Contractor shall at his own cost and expense, and in direct
conformity to the hereinafter contained specifications, furnish all the
materials as specified, and all labor necessary or proper for the pur-
poses; and in a good, substantial, and workmanlike manner, construct
Section of the Sewerage system of the City of do all
earth, rock, and lumber work, construct all masonry, build in, or in
connection with said masonry, all iron, timber and other work required
or ordered to be so built, lay all pipes and iron work, and do all work
necessary for taking care of any water that may interfere with the
operations of construction, and do all work necessary to construct the
said work in accordance with the plans in the manner and under the
conditions herein specified.
This is a general clause summarizing the work to be done.
It should clearly state what is expected of the contractor and
should indicate what material, if any, is to be furnished by the
282 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
party of the first part. The paragraph given above is unusu-
ally condensed.
B. To prevent all dispute and litigation, it is further agreed by and
between the parties to this contract that the Engineer shall in all cases
determine the amount or quality of the several kinds of work which are
to be paid for under the contract, and he shall determine all questions
in relation to said work and the construction thereof; he shall, in all
cases, determine every question which may arise relative to the fulfill-
ment of this contract on the part of said Contractor; and his estimate
and decision shall be final and conclusive upon said Contractor; and
in case any question shall arise between the parties hereto, touching
this contract, such estimate and decision shall be a condition precedent
to the right of the Contractor to receive any money under this agree-
ment.
This clause, or a similar one, is invariably found in engineer-
ing contracts, although, of late years particularly, much oppo-
sition to the clause has been expressed.1 The courts are not
fully agreed upon what ground to support it, and in some
exceptional cases whether to support it at all. The clause does
not prevent the contractor from applying to the courts for relief
if he believes that the engineer has acted dishonestly or has
been guilty of gross mistakes. The courts are inclined to require
the engineer's estimate and certificate before taking up the
question of his accuracy and honesty, and the United States
courts have held that slight errors in an engineer's estimates
are not sufficient to imply fraud or bad faith, and that his esti-
mate is conclusive upon questions of count, measurement, or
distance, provided he has exercised an honest judgment. In
spite of the apparently one-sided character of this clause, making
the agent of one party the umpire for both, the clause,
through the sense of fair dealing which most engineers have,
seldom works harm; occasionally there is an instance of
outrageous wrong under its authority.
C. And it is further agreed by the parties to this agreement that
whenever the Engineer aforesaid shall be unable to act, in consequence
1 Trans. Am. Soc. C. E., Vol. 58, p. 345 et seq., p. 380.
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 283
of absence or other cause, then such other Engineer or assistant as the
Board of Sewer Commissioners shall designate, shall perform all the
duties and be vested with all the power herein given to said Engineer.
There are certain duties which the engineer of a company
cannot delegate, especially if the work is of considerable impor-
tance and magnitude and the engineer has been selected with
special reference to his personal skill, judgment, or discretion.
Such work as drafting, setting grade stakes, or other mechanical
work may properly be assigned to assistants, custom permitting
it and no special judgment being exercised, but the higher
engineering functions, properly called judicial acts, cannot be
delegated.
D. It is expressly understood and mutually agreed by the parties
hereto that the quantities of the various classes of work to be done and
materials to be furnished under this agreement, which have been
estimated as stated in the proposal of this work, are approximate,
and only for the purposes of comparing on a uniform basis the bids
offered for the work; and the Contractor further agrees that neither
the City nor the Board is to be held responsible that any of the said
estimated quantities be found even approximately correct in the con-
struction of the work; and that the said Contractor will make no
claim for anticipated profits, or for loss of profit, because of difference
between the quantities of the various classes of work actually done, or
of materials actually delivered, and the quantities stated in the bids,
and the Contractor hereby undertakes and agrees that he will complete
the entire work to the satisfaction of the Board and in accordance
with the specifications and plans herein mentioned at the prices
herein agreed upon and fixed therefor.
When an erroneous preliminary estimate has been made by
an engineer, and when the contractor has based his proposal
on such an estimate, thereby being put to additional expense,
it would seem in justice as if the company represented by the
engineer should bear the additional expense. To avoid this,
however, the clause given is inserted, under which the con-
tractor must be assumed to take all risk of the quantities turning
out larger than the engineer had represented. When payment
is made on a unit price basis, and where the bids on the separate
284 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
items represent fair values for the work, the interpretation of
this clause is not often questioned. Statements of quality are
more uncertain, and an engineer always hesitates to make any
statements about the quality of earth supposed in a trench, lest,
for example, other material be found and he be asked for
extra compensation because of his misstatement. A sub-
stantial change in the quantities, in spite of this clause, might
operate to extinguish the contract, or the contractor might
recover for the additional work at the unit prices named in
the contract. The most equitable proceeding is certainly for
the engineer to prepare a careful and complete statement of
quantities and of conditions and then to make additional
compensation if changes are made.
E. And it is further expressly agreed that all the work, labor and
materials to be done and furnished under this contract shall be done
and furnished strictly pursuant and in conformity to the following
specifications and to the direction of the Engineer as given from time
to time during the progress of the work under the terms of the contract
and specifications, which said specifications form part of this agree-
ment.
The plans and specifications are intended to be explanatory of each
other, but should any discrepancy appear or any misunderstanding
arise as to the import of anything contained in either, the parties hereto
further agree that the explanation and decision of the Engineer shall
be final and binding on the Contractor, and all directions and explana-
tions required, alluded to, or necessary to complete any of the provi-
sions of this contract and these specifications and give them due effect
shall be given by the Engineer. Corrections of errors or omissions
in drawings or specifications may be made by the Engineer when such
correction is necessary for the proper fulfillment of the intention of such
drawings or specifications, the effect of such correction to date from
the time that the Engineer gives due notice thereof to the Contractor.
In order that the specifications shall be equally binding with the
contract, some such clause as the above is necessary. The clauses
of the specifications are often general, applicable to the performance
of the contract rather than to the prosecution of the construction,
and no uncertainty should exist. Often the specifications and
plans are not attached to the contract, are not signed nor
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 285
described nor even referred to in the contract. In such cases
they have no bearing on the interpretation of the contract.
There is a tendency to give more weight to the written contract
than to the specifications or plans, should discrepancies occur.
Between the plans and specifications there is no room for choice.
Both are prepared presumably by the same engineer and with the
same care. Specifications being changed more easily, it is reason-
able to expect that they would more exactly represent tjie true
intentions of the two parties. Written matter in law prevails over
printed matter, and punctuation is interpreted so as to make the
instrument rational and self-consistent. Care must be taken not
to make changes in the plans or specifications after they have been
signed, without the consent or knowledge of both parties, since
such tampering with the documents may be legal forgery. Where
plans are incomplete or insufficient, the contractor in general is not
relieved from his obligation to carry out the evident intention of
the contract, but neither is the contractor liable if the work fails
or proves worthless after having been faithfully executed according
to the plans. It cannot be too strongly urged that complete
detailed plans be provided far enough in advance of the execution
of the contract so that they may be thoroughly checked and all
inconsistencies with the specifications eliminated.
F. It is further agreed that the said Engineer may make alterations
in the line, grade, plan, form, position, dimensions, or material of the
work herein contemplated or of any part thereof, either before or after
the commencement of construction and that said Board may at any
time order that any portion of the sewer shall not be built. If such
alterations diminish the quantity of work to be done they shall not
constitute a claim for damages or for anticipated profits on that por-
tion of the work dispensed with ; if they increase the amount of work
such increase shall be paid for according to the quantity actually done,
at the price established for such work under the contract.
Even with this clause, if the character of the work to be done
is so changed that the terms of the contract are not applicable,
making it impossible to say to what part of it the new work should
be applied, the contractor would be entitled to recover for the
286 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
value of all the work as if there had been no contract. A verbal
agreement to certain changes may substitute an oral agreement
for the original instrument, and the authority of this clause does
not allow the engineer to arbitrarily annul the contract. The
contractor, to an extent, loses his rights to claims for extra com-
pensation by proceeding to execute alterations without protest, and
his right to recovery often depends upon his having given notice to
the company that he considers his rights invaded. Where extra
work is the result of the engineer's mistakes in lines and levels,
and the contractor is required to follow those lines, the company
which employs the engineer should pay for it, and the contractor is
not limited to any rate fixed by the contract. Care must be taken
in making changes that they are not of such a character as to
release the surety bond which guarantees the performance of an
express contract under certain definite circumstances.
SPECIFICATIONS.
G. (i) The Contractor shall make all requisite excavation for
construction of foundation walls, screening chambers, pump wells,
sewer and drain pipes and all appertaining structures; do all pumping,
bailing and draining; all sheeting and shoring; all fencing, lighting and
watching; furnish and drive all piles required and as directed; put in
place all masonry and concrete; construct the brick sewer as shown
on the drawings; erect, in entire conformity to the plans and specifica-
tions, the brick and wooden building to be used as a pumping station ;
furnish and put in place the cast iron force mains; furnish and put in
place the wrought iron air pipes; furnish and put in place the ejector
chamber; furnish and put in place the ejector complete; furnish and
put in place the flushing and overflow pipes from the pumping station
to the creek; construct the chimney complete, as specified; refill all
trenches and excavation, as directed; clear away all rubbish and
surplus material, unless claimed by the Board, and bring all excavated
material, not used for refilling, to a smooth, even grade; and furnish
all materials, tools, implements and labor required for the complete
construction and operation of Section. . . .of the Sewerage system of
the City of with all its appurtenances.
This is an introductory and general clause of the specifications,
rehearsing the general obligation of the contractor.
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 287
(2) All necessary lines, levels and grades will be given by the
proper marks, and the Contractor shall provide, at his own expense,
such forms, stakes, plank and such assistance at all times as may be
required by the Engineer for giving the same. Material ready for
immediate use in setting grades shall be at hand when required by the
Engineer or his assistants; otherwise they may pass on to other parts
of the work and the Contractor shall make no claim for damages from
consequent delay. If the Contractor, through wilfulness or careless-
ness, removes or causes the removal of said marks before the prosecu-
tion of the work requires it, the replacing of the same shall be at the
expense of the Contractor.
This requirement that the contractor shall provide the engineer
with stakes, etc., is customary. The second sentence of the clause
is for the purpose of expediting the work of a level party with many
duties. In the experience of the author it has been very useful.
Thg third sentence is useful rather to act as a restraint than to cause
expense to the contractor, and it is rarely operative as it reads.
(3) All work during its progress shall conform truly to the lines and
levels given by the Engineer and shall be built in accordance with the
plans and directions given from time to time by him, subject to such
modifications and additions as shall be deemed necessary by him
during its execution, and in no case shall work in excess of the plans
and specifications be paid for unless ordered in writing by him.
This clause is often made a part of the clause just preceding,
except for the last phrase. Section H of the contract deals with
extra work more specifically.
(4) The Contractor shall not (except after consent from the proper
parties) enter or occupy with men, tools, or materials, any land except
that belonging to or taken by the city. The Contractor shall, when-
ever so required by the Engineer, erect fences along the roadways and
around the ground occupied by him and of such a character as will be
sufficient for the protection of the adjoining property.
This clause is really included in clause Q, since a violation
involves a suit for trespass, for which among others clause H is
provided. The party of the first part should be sure that rights
of way are secured before the contractor begins work; otherwise
the contractor may recover for the inevitable delay. Without this
288 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
clause, the contractor is personally liable for trespass if he deposits
earth or rubbish on an adjoining lot, and the party of the first
part is liable only when the work done according to the specifica-
tions becomes a nuisance or a permanent injury to such estates.
(5) Whenever it is necessary to interfere with roads or railroads the
Contractor shall, at his own expense, provide suitable and safe bridges
or other sufficient accommodation for the travel on said roads and
shall maintain the same in good and safe condition until the roads
shall be restored, when he shall remove all bridges and other temporary
expedients and restore said road to conditions suitable for use, all to be
satisfactory to the Engineer.
This clause, while apparently placing the burden of maintaining
traffic on the contractor and relieving the city of its natural obliga-
tion to keep its streets in a safe condition for travel, has been
variously interpreted by the courts on the ground that any accident
may be the result of the work itself and not of its unskillful per-
formance. The courts have held that the city is liable if injuries
occur on account of neglect of proper precautions. This does not,
however, relieve the contractor of liability if he or his servants have
been negligent or careless in the performance of his contract.
The Contractor shall give reasonable notice to the owners of rail-
roads and private ways before interfering with them. He shall provide
watchmen, red lights, and fences, at his own expense, and take such
other precautions as may be necessary to protect life and property,
and shall be liable for all damages occasioned in any way by his act
or neglect or that of his agents, employees, or workmen.
This second part of the clause is probably unnecessary. The
liability for accidents or damages is referred to in clause Q of
the contract, and carelessness or negligence would make him liable
in the eyes of the law, without such a clause.
EXCAVATION.
(6) Trenches for sewers and appurtenances shall be excavated in
all cases in such manner and to such depths and widths as will give
proper and sufficient room for building the structures they are to con-
tain and for sheeting, pumping, draining, or placing any artificial
foundation for the structure.
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 289
It is questionable if this is necessary. The contractor ought to
be allowed to open and dig his trenches as he thinks best, provided
the structures they contain are not interfered with.
Trenches shall be opened in accordance with the lines and grades
given for the work, on such locations, at such times, and only so far
in advance of the work as may be required by the Engineer. But no
trench shall be at any time open for a length greater than three hun-
dred feet from the point where the back filling is complete to the solid
ground at the end of the trench, without the written permission of the
Engineer.
Here again it is questionable whether the engineer ought to be
allowed to dictate to the contractor how the work shall be prose-
cuted, in what order, or in what length of trench. The author,
however, had great trouble with one contractor, who paid sub-
contractors for trenching and pipe-laying and filled in the trenches
himself at his convenience. This resulted at times in an unneces-
sary interference with travel throughout the city, and this clause
has been used with good effect to prevent such a recurrence. In
streets with heavy traffic the open trench distance might properly
be reduced to one hundred or even fifty feet.
All excavations shall be open cut from the surface and no tunneling
will be allowed except permission be previously obtained from the
Engineer.
This clause is intended to preserve the integrity of the street.
In some soils it saves the cost of sheeting to dig an open trench
about eight feet long, then pass by four feet and dig again, tunneling
through the four feet of solid earth, which acts as a brace to keep
the trench from caving. The objection is that the tunnel is not
refilled solidly and may afterwards settle. If it does not settle,
it gives a different surface from the trench part, making the street
uneven.
(7) All surfacing materials from excavations, including pavement,
paving, gravel, road-metal, soil, turf, etc., shall be carefully removed
and kept separate, to be used in repairing or resurfacing the streets,
road, or ground.
This clause requires the contractor to throw out on one side of
the trench the surface material, whether that be loam or street
290 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
surface, so that it may be used separately when the trench is
refilled. It usually costs the contractor nothing but a little fore-
sight.
(8) The materials excavated and those used in construction shall
be so placed as not to endanger the work, and so that free access may
be had at any time to all parts of the trench and to all hydrants and
gates in the vicinity. They shall be neatly piled and trimmed so as
to inconvenience as little as possible the public travel or the adjoining
residents. All streets, roads, railroads, and private ways shall be kept
open for the usual travel, and the materials excavated shall be so
handled and placed as not to unnecessarily interfere therewith.
This clause has to do with the convenience and aesthetic feelings
of the public rather than with actual dangers. Sometimes the
contractor is obliged by this clause or by one similar to place
boards or canvas on a lawn before excavation is begun. Ready
access to hydrants and water gates is imperative, although without
oversight laborers will bury a hydrant completely if placed suit-
ably. The private ways are usually driveways into private property
which may be blocked by a pile of dirt.
(9) The bottom of the trench, when the nature of the earth permits,
shall be excavated to the exact form and size of the pipe to be laid
therein. Additional excavation shall be made at the joints of pipe
sewers so that the pipes shall have a continuous and even bearing
and the pressure from above be distributed through them equally
and evenly.
The provisions of this clause ought to be carried out, but in the
case of pipe sewers it is rarely done. With brick and concrete
sewers, it is for the interest of the contractor to have a solid bearing
for the masonry, and the excavation is made as desired. But it is
an exception even with this clause to have any other than a flat
bottom for the trench and satisfactory bell holes are equally rare.
Nevertheless they should be required.
(10) Should excavation below grade line be considered necessary
for foundation by the Engineer, such extra excavation shall be done by
the Contractor, for which he shall be paid as provided in Article O,
item — .
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 291
Other material shall be deposited in place of that removed, as pro-
vided in Article G, item — .
It is manifestly unfair to require a contractor to bind himself to
excavate an unknown amount of soft material from the bottom of
a trench at the bidding of the engineer. This clause provides that
he shall do such excavation if required, that he shall be paid for
it at a definite prearranged rate, and that material shall be sub-
stituted for that removed, also at a definite price.
(n) When rock is encountered it shall be uncovered and after it has
been measured, shall be taken out so to be at no point at a depth less
than six (6) inches below the grade of the sewer.
This is a common requirement. It is supposed to give a better
bearing for pipe than if the pipe were allowed to rest at one point
upon rock and at another on earth. There should be no ambiguity
possible, however, as to the amount of rock excavation which is
to be paid for nor as to the cost of furnishing and placing the
dirt necessary for the six inches of refill, neither of which is
here mentioned.
(12) All excavation will be measured or estimated either as earth or
rock, the latter to include all boulders of one-half (J) cubic yard or
more in volume. All other materials found in excavation, however
hard, stiff and compact, including soft and disintegrated rock, which
can be removed with a pick, will be estimated and paid for as earth.
In some cases where a contract for excavation of earth at a fixed
rate per cubic yard has been made and where it has been shown
by contractors and engineers that the material excavated was
"hardpan," a material known and recognized as entirely distinct
from common earth, and that it is customary for contractors to
receive extra compensation for excavating it, the courts have
allowed the contractor to recover what it is reasonably worth to
excavate it.
(13) All excavation of rock, and of earth over rock, will be esti-
mated and paid for as three (3) feet in width for all sizes of pipe.
No allowances will be made for additional width at manholes or else-
where.
292 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
This width should vary with the size of the pipe to be laid and
with the depth of the trench. In shallow trenches for 6-inch pipe
2\ feet width may be more equitable. For 24-inch pipe in a
lo-foot trench, 4 feet would be nearer the width actually dug.
It is self-adjusting, however, since the contractor will have a larger
price per cubic yard if he thinks the width given is not as wide as
he will excavate. The kind of rock also affects the width to be
allowed, the sedimentary rocks allowing a narrower trench than
the igneous rocks.
(14) The prices of earth excavation shall include the cost of
removal, of delay from or damage occasioned by any timber or
masonry structures, logs, trees or other obstacles, except rock as
hereinbefore specified.
This clause makes (12) more specific, although it is not likely
that a contractor would attempt to secure extra compensation
because of buried logs. An old corduroy road a few feet below
the surface, however, would be a great temptation to a contractor
for a claim for "extras" except for this clause.
(15) Blasts shall be covered with mats and heavy timber, chained
together, and other necessary precautions shall be taken for the protec-
tion of the works, buildings, and travel; caps or other exploders shall
in no case be kept in the same place in which dynamite or other
explosives are stored; and, in general, the precautions against accident
from blasting shall be entirely satisfactory to the Engineer. No
blasting shall be done within thirty (30) feet of the finished sewer.
The courts have held that an owner cannot perform any act
on his own premises which is intrinsically dangerous and where
the damage would be a necessary, probable or natural consequence.
On the other hand, they have held that injury occasioned by
negligent blasting of rocks by a contractor did not make the city
liable. Probably under ordinary conditions the contractor would
be liable for damages due to blasting without this clause, and it is
wrong in principle for the engineer to direct the work of the con-
tractor. The last sentence is due to the one instance of the fracture
of a lot of pipe already laid, by the concussion of air in a deep
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 293
trench due to a heavy blast. A good many blasts are fired, how-
ever, within five feet of a finished sewer, the end being covered,
without injury to the sewer.
(16) The Contractor shall be liable for all damages to persons or
property caused by blast or explosives, or from neglect in properly
guarding the trenches, and no compensation to said Contractor will,
under any circumstances, be allowed for losses thus incurred.
The comment on the preceding clause applies also here. The
clause is a good one in that it places definitely the responsibility.
The author remembers a case of a gas main ignorantly broken,
just before work stopped for the night, and how the claim of the
contractor that it was inevitable on account of the location and
that the large bill of the gas company should be paid by the city,
was effectually resisted by reference to this clause.
(17) The Contractor shall at his own expense furnish, put in place,
and maintain such sheeting, bracing, etc., as may be required to
support the sides of all excavation (whether above or below the sewer
grade) and to prevent any movement which could in any way diminish
the width necessary for proper drainage or otherwise injure or delay
the work ; all slides and caves shall be at his cost.
Custom and usage would probably require a contractor who
agreed to excavate a trench at a certain price per cubic yard to
furnish the labor and material for sheeting without this clause.
However, it is useful as making the sheeting a definite part of the
contractor's work.
(18) If it is necessary to interfere in any manner with any water
or gas pipes, drains, catch-basins, culverts, or other similar structures,
public or private, the Contractor shall, at his own expense, sling, shore
up, and secure and maintain a continual flow in said structures, and
shall repair any damages done to any of said structures and keep them
in repair until the final acceptance of the completed work, leaving
them in as good condition as they were previous to this interference,
and the said Contractor shall be liable for all damages or claims
against the city arising from neglect or carelessness, or in any way
arising from any interference with said pipes. While it is supposed
that the location and size of pipes, drains, etc., are accurately shown
294 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
on the maps in the Engineer's office, it is not so guaranteed, and no
claim shall be made by the Contractor on account of any pipe being
found not in the position shown on the map.
The larger the city in which the work is to be done the more
important does this clause become. In connection with the work
on the New York subway, for example, the cost of keeping water
pipes, gas pipes, sewers, etc., all properly working was no small
item, and there should be no question as to the responsibility
therefor.
(19) Care shall be taken not to move without the consent of the
proper parties any water or gas pipes, culverts, telegraph, telephone,
and electric poles or wires, buildings or other structures; and in
crossing these, or in running parallel with, or near them, they shall be
sustained securely in place until the work is complete and shall then be
so treated as to render their condition as safe and permanent as before.
If so directed by the Engineer, the location of any existing work shall
be changed to meet the requirements of the sewer and appurtenances
and new work shall be added, when necessary, to leave all in good
working order. All the cost of such changes will be paid for as extra
work solely on the valuation of the Engineer and depending on his
decision as to whether the work is or is not incurred under this
contract in the work required of the Contractor.
The clause discriminates between ordinary care of structures
referred to in (18) and the work necessary to move any structure
into a new location for the better construction or maintenance of
the new work. It gives opportunity for an engineer to materially
assist the contractor. For example, if a water pipe line is curved,
bringing a part of it into the sewer trench where it must be sup-
ported, the engineer might direct the contractor to relay the water
pipe in a straight line, taking it away from the sewer. In such a
case the cost would be paid for as extra work. Otherwise the
contractor would not only have the cost of slinging the pipe in his
trench, but of the excavation in his trench, at a higher rate on
account of the obstruction of the water pipe.
(20) The Contractor shall furnish sufficient pumping plant, and
provide and maintain drainage in the trench satisfactory to the Kngi-
neer. In wet gravel or at such places as the Engineer may direct,
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 295
drain tile, to be furnished by the city, shall be laid by the Contractor
along a graded bottom, the laying to be paid for according to Article
O, item Water shall not be allowed to rise on any masonry until
the mortar has set at least twenty-four (24) hours, and no stream of
water shall flow through newly laid pipes or over masonry until such
time as the Engineer may direct. Sufficient pumping in the immedi-
ate vicinity of the new pipe joints shall be at all times maintained so
that no joint shall be laid in water or have water on or around it until
the cement shall have received its initial set.
The more the risk to the contractor can be eliminated, the
nearer the proposals and the contract prices will be to the actual
cost. The contractor should not be required to furnish an
unknown number of feet of drain tile without special compensation
therefor. It is unfortunate, however, that the clause as it stands
gives opportunity for collusion between the engineer and con-
tractor. If the former orders drain tile, the trench drainage costs
the contractor nothing. If the engineer refuses to order drain tile,
the drainage must be done by pumps at the expense of the con-
tractor. It is to be hoped that in a clause of some future specifi-
cations the cost of pumping will be allowed the contractor at so
much per thousand gallons, so that there may be no inducement to
the engineer to require pumping or drain tile other than the effect
on the quality of the work.
(21) All water from the sewer trench, and from any sewers, drains,
water courses, etc., which may be interfered with, shall be conveyed to
a suitable place of discharge in a manner satisfactory to the Engineer.
This requirement might seem unnecessary except that a con-
tractor pumping water from a trench is not usually particular as to
what becomes of that water. The clause authorizes the engineer
to exercise supervision.
CEMENT.
(22) American hydraulic or Portland cement, as directed, will be
furnished to the Contractor for use in the work.
This clause assumes that the city will furnish the cement. If the
contractor is to furnish the cement, proper specifications may be
found in Baker's " Masonry and Foundations " or in Engineering
296 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
Record for June 25, 1904, page 791, where the standard specifica-
tions proposed by the American Society for Testing Materials are
given. Excellent specifications for the care and control of cement
on work are given in Engineering Record, Vol. 50, p. 243, being
those used on a concrete arch bridge in the city of Hartford, Conn.
(23) The Contractor shall keep all cement delivered to him raised
above the ground several inches by blocking or otherwise, and properly
and tightly covered from exposure to the weather and dampness.
The Contractor will be held responsible for any loss or damage to the
cement after its delivery to him at the railroad, steamboat or store-
house, as the Sewer Board may select, and all haulage from station,
wharf or storehouse shall be at the expense of the Contractor.
This clause is essential if the contractor does not furnish the
cement, since otherwise he will not properly care for it after it has
been brought on the work.
«
SAND.
(24) The sand for use in the mixture of cement mortar shall be
furnished by the contractor. It shall be clean, screened, sharp sand,
free from loam, vegetable matter or other foreign substances, and
satisfactory to the Engineer.
There is a growing tendency to make this clause more definite
by naming the per cent of foreign matter allowable in the sand,
thus taking from the engineer the absolute power given by the
clause as it stands. Five per cent of clay has been named as a
suitable maximum amount.
MORTAR.
(25) The sand and cement used to make mortar shall be thor-
oughly mixed, dry, and unless otherwise directed by the Engineer,
in the following proportions: for sewer pipe joints, one part by meas-
ure of cement to one part of sand; for covering pipe joints, one part by
measure of cement to three parts of sand; and for all other purposes
one part by measure of cement and two parts of sand. A moderate
amount of water shall afterwards be added to produce a paste of
proper consistency, and the whole shall be thoroughly worked with
hoes or other tools. A fair compensation, as determined by the
Engineer, will be made to the Contractor for variations of the above
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 297
proportions. The Contractor shall at his own expense furnish the
water for mixing mortar and for all other purposes. The mortar shall
be freshly mixed when used, that is, shall be made only in sufficient
quantity for the work in hand in proper boxes made for the purpose.
No mortar shall be used that has begun to set or become hard. All
such mortar shall be thrown away and not used in any capacity on the
work.
It is far better to have the proportions fixed beforehand than
to name one mixture in the specifications and then use another
on the work, the engineer deciding what extra compensation the
contractor is entitled to because of the change. See also comment
on (22).
CONCRETE.
(26) Concrete shall be used in the foundations, around pipes, and
for other purposes wherever required by the Engineer. All material
necessary to make the concrete, except cement, shall be furnished by
the Contractor.
Since this contract assumed a unit price for the concrete it was
important to specify where the concrete would be used, since its
cost would vary with the location. In some kinds of work there
should be a number of items in the contract, each giving the price
of concrete for a different place.
(27) The concrete shall consist of pebbles or broken stones of
various sizes; and shall be mixed in the following proportions: five (5)
parts by measure of broken stone to two (2) parts of sand and one (i)
part of cement. The broken stone shall be firm and sound and free
from clay and other objectionable material. No piece shall be greater
than two (2) inches or less than one-quarter (|) inch in diameter.
The above proportion shall be varied, if so desired by the Engineer,
and a fair compensation given the Contractor for said change, as
determined by the Engineer.
This again allows the engineer to vary the proportions and to be
the sole judge of the compensation, if any, to be granted the con-
tractor— a bad principle. This is not a complete specification, no
distinction being made between gravel and broken stone and no
statement being made as to whether the cement is to be measured
in the original package or loose.
298 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
(28) The mixing shall be done in proper boxes, in a manner satis-
factory to the Engineer, and after the materials are wet the work must
proceed rapidly until the concrete is in place and so thoroughly
rammed that water flushes to the surface and all the interstices
between the stones are entirely filled with mortar. Should voids be
discovered, when the forms or molds are removed, the defective
work shall be removed and the space refilled with suitable material,
satisfactory to the Engineer. It shall be allowed to set for a sufficient
time, to be determined by the Engineer, before walking over or work ing
upon it will be permitted. Where forms are required to hold the
concrete in place they shall be set true to the line and shall be securely
fastened so that they will not get out of place while the concrete is
being laid.
This clause is entirely inadequate for any large work. The
method of mixing, or some test for its thoroughness, should be
specified.
(29) The quantity of concrete to be paid for will be determined by
measurements of the number of cubic yards of concrete deposited in
place, in conformity with the plans and directionsof the Engineer. An
account shall be kept of the number of barrels of cement used, mixed
as above specified, and the Contractor will not be allowed for the con-
crete at a greater rate than twenty-one cubic feet of concrete per
barrel of cement used.
This clause is inconsistent with itself. It was so written because
it was expected that a large part of the concrete would be used in
and around sewer pipes where exact measurements of the volume
of concrete in place would be impossible, but it was not satisfactory.
It would be better to have the amount used actually measured in
a box if place measurement is not feasible.
BRICKWORK.
(30) All brick shall be of good quality, hard burned, common red
brick. The brick shall be thoroughly wet just before laying, every
brick being completely bedded in mortar on its bottom, sides, and
top, at one operation. The joints shall not exceed f inch.
The outside of all walls or sides of all arches, foundations, or man-
hole walls, or where directed by the Engineer, shall be plastered with
Portland cement mortar, at least if inch thick. All internal joints
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 299
shall be raked in and thoroughly smoothed with mortar. All brick
courses shall be kept level, bonded, and laid to line, either plumb or
to the batter required by the drawing.
This clause was intended for manhole brickwork and is inade-
quate for the brickwork of a large sewer. The quality of the brick
ought to be more specific. The thickness of joints named is not
possible on the outside of a manhole wall, much less of a small
brick sewer. The surfaces to be plastered ought not to be named
by the engineer, but should be all named in the contract.
IRON.
(31) The cast iron used for manhole covers shall be tough and
have a tensile strength of not less than 18,000 pounds per square inch,
with a light gray fracture. The castings shall be free from cracks,
blow-holes or other imperfections, straight, true to pattern, and have a
workmanlike finish. The castings shall be thoroughly cleaned and
coated with asphalt varnish, of approved composition, and shall be of
the weight, shape and dimensions shown on the drawings.
This is a customary clause but poor in many respects. No
provision is made for test pieces and therefore it is not likely that
the tensile strength of the iron will ever be examined. The
strength as a whole might well be tested by dropping a weight of
specified amount on the center of the cover as it rests in place on
the frame. The possible variation in weight or dimensions from
those shown on the drawings should be stated so that no question
of the proper rejection of light-weight castings can arise.
SEWER PIPE.
(32) The main sewer shall be constructed of the best quality of
salt-glazed, vitrified, stoneware sewer pipe, and all special pieces or
specials which may be required in the work shall be of the same
description and quality. The pipes and specials must be submitted to
a careful inspection and must conform to the following conditions,
viz.:
(33) All hubs or sockets must be of sufficient diameter to receive
for their full depth the spigot end of the next following pipe or special
without any chipping whatever of either, and also to leave a space of
300 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
not less than f inch in width all around for the cement mortar joint.
Pipes and specials which cannot be thus freely fitted into each other
will be rejected.
(34) All pipe shall be in sections not less than two and one-half
(2$) feet in length, and preference will be given to sections three (3)
feet in length. The sockets for six (6) and eight (8) inch pipe shall be
at least two and one-half inches deep, and no divergence from a truly
circular cross section will be allowed.
(35) Any pipe or special which exhibits fire cracks of a size calcu-
lated, in the opinion of the Engineer, to injure the pipe, will cause
said pipe to be rejected.
(36) Any pipe or special which is found to be cracked through its
whole thickness from any other cause except the process of burning in
the kiln shall be rejected at once, regardless of the extent of such
crack. This refers particularly to damage done by transportation, by
cooling, or by frost.
(37) Irregular lumps or unbroken blisters on the interior surface
of a pipe or special, of sufficient size and number to form an appreci-
able obstruction to the free flow of the sewage, will be cause for rejec-
tion. Small broken blisters placed at the top of the pipe will not be
cause for rejection, but large broken blisters, even if the pipe be so laid
as to bring such blisters on the top of the sewer, shall be cause for
rejection.
(38) Any pipe or special which betrays in any manner a want of
thorough vitrification or fusion, or the use of improper materials and
methods in its manufacture, shall be rejected.
(39) All pipe and specials which are designed to be straight shall
not exhibit any material deviation from a straight line and shall not
vary more than three-eighths (f ) inch from a straight line in a length
of two and a half (2^) feet. Special curves and bends shall substan-
tially conform to the degree of curvature and general dimensions that
may be required.
(40) If a piece be broken out of the rim forming the hub or socket
of a pipe or special without injuring the body of such pipe, the latter
shall be rejected if the length of said broken piece, or the gap left
thereby, is greater than one-tenth of the circumference of said hub.
In case a defect of this nature and within the limits just defined occurs
in a pipe or special, the latter shall also be rejected unless it can be so
fitted in the sewer as to bring said defect on the upper part thereof.
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 301
(41) Pipe to be used in the work shall be inspected when being laid,
and the Contractor may not require inspection at any other time or
place nor shall an inspection at any other time relieve the Contractor
from his responsibility to use only pipe as specified.
In Johnson's " Specifications " may be found details of the per-
missible size of fire cracks and of blisters, the original specifications
having been formulated by Emil Kuichling of Rochester. (35)
and (37) would by his specifications be perfectly definite and not
subject to the opinion of an individual. If the clauses above
given are used, the Kuichling detailed definitions might well be given
to the inspectors to guide them in knowing, for example, what are
"large blisters." (41) is inserted because the contractor, to get
his rebate on pipe broken in transit, often wishes the pipe inspected
as they are taken out of the freight car. Then he demurs if pipe
accepted then are afterwards rejected, although transportation by
wagon from car to trench cracks and breaks many pipe.
PIPE LAYING.
(42) The pipes and specials shall be so laid in the trench that after
the sewer is completed the invert shall conform accurately to the
grades and alignments fixed and given by the Engineer.
This is a poor clause. The pipe is continually tested as it is
being laid by the inspector or engineer's assistant, and the contrac-
tor might very well say, if in some way it should be found that the
pipe after being laid was not true to grade, that he had exercised
no control and therefore could not be held responsible. Again, if
settlement occurs, the contractor, under the specifications, should
not be held responsible, since the engineer, not he, is charged with
pronouncing on the character of the foundation. This question
led to an interesting lawsuit in New Orleans (1907) in which the
opinion of the contractor was upheld by the courts.
(43) All pipes and specials shall be laid to the grade given by the
Engineer and in such manner as he directs, with joints close and even,
butting all around, special care being taken that there is no sagging of
the spigot end in the hub, and that a true, even surface is given to the
invert throughout the entire length of the sewer. A narrow gasket
of jute shall be provided by the Contractor, to be well soaked in neat
302 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
cement grout and introduced between the hub and spigot, and well
and properly rammed. It shall in all cases be driven to the bottom of
the hub to leave room for the mortar as specified. The space between
the spigot and hub shall then be entirely filled with mortar thoroughly
pressed in on the bottom, sides, and top, and every precaution taken
to secure a water-tight joint. The mortar shall be applied with a
rubber mitten and rammed or compacted with a wooden calking tool.
The joint shall be finished with a neat and generous bevel made with
the mitten. After the joint is thus made, a covering of cement mortar
(one to three) shall be placed around and under the joint, said covering
to be at least two inches in thickness from the bell entirely around the
pipe. The interior of each joint shall be scraped clean of all pro-
jecting mortar, and, when the size of pipe permits, pointed. No
length of pipe shall be laid until the previous length laid has had suffi-
cient fine earth filled and tamped around it to securely hold it in place
so as to prevent any movement or disturbance. If, in making any
joints, previous lengths are moved or disturbed so as to break joints
made and covered, the pipe and joints shall be uncovered and the
joints remade.
For pipe sewers, this is the most important clause in the specifi-
cations. The value of the sewer system depends on the tightness
of the joints. Yet contractors usually assume that so long as
the pipe are placed in the trench and a little cement wiped over
the top of the joint, the engineer ought to be satisfied. If only the
mortar were made barely plastic and then rammed into the joint
with a wooden stick until the joint space was filled, a tight joint
might be expected. Similarly, the provision that pipes newly
laid shall not be disturbed is rarely observed, although freedom
from disturbance is essential if the joints, once made, shall set
without cracks or breaks.
(44) When necessary, in order to facilitate the work and prevent
disturbance of pipe already laid, pipes and specials shall first be
properly fitted together in the order in which they are to be used, and
marked before being lowered into the trench.
This is seldom done, although if two pipes were fitted together
on the bank and cemented together, and after the joints had set,
lowered into the trench as pieces six feet long, the number of poor
joints would be much reduced.
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 303
(45) The drainage of the trench shall be so effected as not to allow
a stream of water to run through the newly laid pipe, washing the
mortar out of the joints.
This clause prohibits what is a very common practice with con-
tractors. The clause should be strictly enforced.
(46) The price for laying sewer pipe shall include the placing and
laying and properly plugging with stoppers of all branches or other
specials in the manner and at the points required by the Engineer.
In wet ground a large amount of leakage comes from poorly
plugged Y's. Special care should be taken to see that every Y
and T is plugged and that not any are overlooked.
(47) Before leaving the work at any time the sewer shall be securely
closed at its open end, and after the work is completed the pipe shall
be carefully and thoroughly cleaned of all refuse, earth, stones and
rubbish.
To this clause might properly be added the requirement that a
cleaner of some definite description be kept in the pipe and dragged
ahead as the work progresses.
(48) The length of pipe to be paid for will be determined by
measurements of the number of lineal feet actually laid, except that no
deduction will be made for pipe left out at manholes.
This is incomplete in two respects. It does not say whether the
measurements are to be made horizontal or on the grade of the
sewer, the latter being proper, nor does it say whether the lengths
of Y's and T's are to be included. In section O the price for Y's
is stated to be "in addition to the cost of straight pipe," but a
statement to that effect should properly be included here.
(49) The right is reserved to connect any lateral sewer or sewers
with the sewers herein specified or to grant permits to any person or
persons to make house connections therewith at any time before the
final completion of the work, and said Contractor shall not interfere
with or place obstruction in the way of such persons as may be
employed in building such sewer or sewers or in making such
connections.
Such a practice as is suggested by this clause is a mistake because
it gives the contractor ground for claiming that his work has been
304 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
accepted when connections are made to it, and because it may
allow the contractor to claim damages or avoid his own obligations,
in the case, for example, of a connection bringing a deposit of mud
into a sewer line which has itself not been properly cleaned out.
(50) Manholes of hard brick laid in cement mortar shall be
constructed at such points as may be designated, by and according to
directions and plans given. The brick shall have a crushing strength
of at least 5,000 pounds per square inch and shall be laid with lines and
templates to agree with the drawings provided by the Engineer. The
manholes will generally be four (4) feet in diameter at the bottom in
the clear and diminish to two (2) feet in diameter at the top of the
masonry, which shall be eight (8) inches below the grade of the street,
and they shall be fitted with a cast-iron head and cover, and such other
metal work shall be used as may be directed. The Contractor shall
furnish the iron and metal work as provided in Section 31
according to the drawings of the Engineer, the manhole covers to be
paid for according to section O, item — .
Some of this is included in section 30, and except that it is desir-
able to have a section specifying the use of manholes, this whole
clause might be omitted. The first and last sentences are the
important ones.
(51) The Contractor shall build into each manhole, at points as
directed, one or two lengths of eight (8) inch pipe for future connec-
tions with the lateral sewers, to be closed with a stoneware cap set in
cement. The cost of such pipes and caps and all the labor connected
therewith shall be included in the cost of the manhole and no addi-
tional compensation will be allowed therefor.
This clause applies to trunk sewers where the connecting laterals
are not to be built at the same time. The matter of steps should
be included in this clause or in the one preceding.
(52) The floor and invert shall be built of concrete or brick, as
directed by the Engineer, the invert having a cross section of the exact
shape of the inverts of the sewers which it connects; changes in size
shall be made evenly and gradually, and shall in all ways conform to
the drawings furnished.
It might be desirable to specify whether the contractor would
be allowed to form the inverts by hand or whether the engineer
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 305
would require the use of forms. The use of split pipe might also
be included.
(53) The brickwork in the walls shall be eight (8) inches thick
throughout, unless otherwise ordered by the Engineer, and shall be
smoothly plastered on the outside with a three-eighths (f) inch
coating of Portland Cement mortar.
If manhole walls thicker than 8 inches are to be used with deep
manholes, it ought to be specified and not left to the engineer,
who by this clause might require the contractor to build them all
with 12-inch walls, although the contractor's price was based on
8-inch walls.
(54) Each manhole, on its completion, shall be thoroughly cleansed
of all refuse or rubbish and shall be so kept until the final acceptance
of the completed work.
This is to prevent the dirt being gradually washed into the sewer
pipe where it may lie undiscovered.
BACK FILLING.
(55) The trench and other excavations shall be refilled with such
excavated material, and in such order, as may be from time to time
directed by the Engineer. In covering the sewers and filling around
manholes, the earth shall be brought up evenly on both sides of the
sewers and around manholes so that no unbalanced pressure is brought
to bear upon the masonry or pipe. The filling about all pipes, and
for a depth of two (2) feet over them, shall be made of earth, free from
stones, thoroughly and carefully rammed, in layers not exceeding four
(4) inches, and special care shall be taken in filling, about and under
as well as over all pipe, that the earth is thoroughly compacted to the
full width of the trench, and no voids or pockets of soft, compressible
material left under or about the sewer. Back filling shall be spread
in layers not exceeding one (i) foot in thickness, unless otherwise
specified, and shall be well watered and rammed. Or, when an
abundance of water can be obtained and the Engineer so directs, the
filling shall be thrown into the trench and allowed to settle into
place through a suitable depth of water. A careful and thorough
settling of the earth back into the trench, by ramming or otherwise,
will be insisted upon, and the amount of surplus dirt over the refilled
trench shall not be such at any time as to offer any obstruction to
306 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
driving or to such a complete use of the street as was had before the
excavation. No stones larger than one foot in diameter shall be used
in back filling, and all stones used in filling must be separately sur-
rounded with earth filling. No frozen earth shall be used for filling.
This clause is not entirely satisfactory but neither is any other
on this subject. Some engineers specify the number of rammers
to be employed; others require all the dirt excavated or a certain
part of it to be replaced ; and others require the contractor to keep
the surface in good order for a long period. It is impossible in a
rock trench to have the stones used in filling separately surrounded
with earth, though it is a proper requirement for boulders found
in clay loam. The last sentence also has to be often violated,
although, when the lumps thaw out, the trench generally settles.
(56) That portion of the sheeting extending below the top of the
pipe must be withdrawn, unless otherwise ordered by the Engineer,
and before the back filling has been carried more than one foot above
the top of the pipe. As the trench is being refilled, the sheeting, etc.
shall be so removed as to avoid the caving in of the trench. The
vacancies left by the sheeting shall be carefully refilled by ramming
with tools especially adapted for the purpose, and by watering or
otherwise as may be directed.
This clause is intended to prevent holes being left on one side
of the pipe so that by unbalanced pressure the pipe might be
crowded out of line. If the sheeting is not withdrawn before the
filling has progressed very far, the holes left will not be well filled.
In a recent case which came to the attention of the author, the
contractor was allowed to leave about $4000 worth of sheeting in
a trench, where this clause might have been enforced and that
amount saved.
(57) When the Engineer decides that the sheeting or bracing cannot
be removed without injury to the work, it shall be left in place and
the Contractor will be paid for the same as provided in Article O, item
13. But no sheeting will be paid for unless a bill for the same accom-
panied by the written order of the Engineer be presented within one
month from the time that the sheeting is placed in the trench.
The question of extra work, to which this clause pertains, is
taken up under Section H. A contractor will leave sheeting in
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 307
place rather than draw it if he has hopes that the engineer may
approve his bill for it. The engineer on construction ought to
make it very clear whether he means to indorse such a claim, since
silence is often taken by the courts to mean assent.
(58) In case sufficient suitable material for the refilling is not
furnished by the excavation of the trenches, that which is suitable will
be provided by the city and shall be hauled and placed by the Con-
tractor. If the haulage of such material exceeds a distance of five
hundred feet an allowance of three-quarters of a cent per cubic yard
will be made for-each one hundred feet of haul over and above five
hundred feet.
This clause is a logical necessity if the provisions of (55) and (n)
requiring the pipe to be bedded in earth even in rock trenches where
excavation has been carried six inches below the pipe are to be
carried out. Practically it is seldom enforced. If frozen clay
should be objected to for back filling, this clause might be used to
have the filling made with sand or gravel.
(59) All surplus earth or other material shall be removed by the
Contractor unless claimed by the city. If such extra material be
claimed by the city, it shall be hauled and deposited at such points as
the Engineer may direct, within a distance of five hundred (500) feet,
without extra compensation to the Contractor. If the length of such
haulage exceeds five hundred (500) feet, an allowance of three-
quarters (f ) of a cent per cubic yard will be made for each one hundred
feet of haul over and above the five hundred (500) feet. If excavated
rock or sand be removed by the city, making a deficiency of back
filling at those particular points, such deficiency of back filling will be
made good by the city.
As a matter of law, any extra material excavated by the contractor
is the property of the abutters if their title extends to the center of
the street, and this clause would hold only by the waiver of the
abutter's rights. If the contractor, for example, should dig up a
lot of sand or gravel to use on other parts of the work, the abutters
could appropriate it, pile it up on their lots, and defy both the
city and the contractor to touch it.
308 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
(60) The surface of the ground in streets and elsewhere shall in all
cases be left in as good condition as it was before the commencement
of the work, and except by written permission of the Engineer, the
street surface in a given block shall not be disturbed for a longer time
than six days, and no new trench in any part of the work called for in
this contract shall be opened without special direction from the
Engineer, should the surface of the street within said block be
disturbed for more than the specified period of six days. When the
surface is of gravel or broken stone, it shall be well rolled with a heavy
roller; the whole work of refilling and resurfacing, of relaying brick
or other pavement with their foundations, shall be done in a manner
to prevent, as far as possible, after-settlement. The Contractor shall
keep the street service over and along the trench and other excavations
in a safe and satisfactory condition, and shall be responsible for any
accident that may occur on account of any defective condition of said
surface. All fences and other structures in the vicinity shall be
repaired or replaced. All trees in the vicinity shall be protected.
This requirement that work shall be completed within six days
in one block cannot be strictly adhered to and therefore perhaps
should not be included. But it is of great service in the case of a
contractor who finds one part of the work difficult and therefore
wishes to let it drag while he pushes other and more profitable
parts of the work to completion.
(61) Whenever the sewer is laid under a brick pavement which is
required to be taken up and relaid, an allowance to the Contractor of
eight (8) cents will be made for each linear foot of pavement relaid.
It was expected that eight cents would be a fair compensation for
relaying the pavement, but it was too low. Probably twelve cents
would be a better estimate of its cost.
(62) As the work progresses, all rubbish and refuse and all unused
material and tools shall be removed at once from the ground. When-
ever this cleaning of rubbish from the street, or the repairing of the
street surfaces, fences, or other damages is neglected, the Engineer will
give notice to that effect to the Contractor, and if such rubbish is not
removed, or if said repairs are not done within two days thereafter, or
if the said Contractor does not at once take the necessary precautions
to ensure the safety of travel, the Engineer may employ other parties
to do such work and the expense thus incurred will be deducted from
any money due or that may become due the Contractor.
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 309
The process of cleaning up is one which seems generally obnox-
ious to a contractor. The clause gives to the engineer power to
remedy dangerous conditions, but he should be slow to do anything
not immediately needed. Otherwise the contractor may claim
excessive cost or undue refinement in the work, and it is a tempta-
tion sometimes for the engineer to make the street surface even
better than at the beginning at the expense of the contractor.
(63) When for any reason the work is left unfinished, all trenches
and excavations shall be filled and the roadway and sidewalks be
left unobstructed and with the surface in a safe and satisfactory
condition.
If this happens on account of a change of plans or is the fault
of the city or its engineer, the city should pay for it. Nothing is
said in the clause about who is to pay for the refilling.
GENERAL.
(64) The Contractor shall use such appliances for the performance
of all the operations connected with the work embraced in this
contract as will secure a satisfactory quality of work and maintain a
rate of progress which, in the opinion of the Engineer, will secure the
completion of the work within the time herein specified. If at any
time before the commencement or during the progress of the work
such appliances appear to the Engineer to be inefficient or inappro-
priate for securing the quality of work required, or the said rate of
progress, he may order the Contractor to increase their efficiency or to
improve their character and the Contractor must conform to such
order. But the failure of the Engineer to demand such increase of
efficiency or improvement shall not relieve the Contractor from his
obligation to secure the quality of work and the rate of progress
established in these specifications.
This clause is a warning clause of which section P is the logical
sequence if no improvement is secured. It is a useful club, although
of itself it probably would have but little weight.
(65) Whenever the Contractor is not present on any part of the
work where it may be necessary to give directions, orders will be given • .
by the Engineer to, and will be received by, the superintendent,
overseer, or foreman of the Contractor who may have charge of the
particular work in relation to which the orders are given.
310 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
In spite of this clause, directions should always be given to the
contractor rather than to his employees. Responsibility for the
work hinges upon its control, and if the contractor is to be held
responsible he must not be unwisely interfered with, nor orders
given to his employees differing from those he has already given
except by virtue of pressing necessity.
(66) Any unfaithful or imperfect work that may be discovered
before the final acceptance of the work shall be corrected immediately
on the requirement of the Engineer, notwithstanding that it may have
been overlooked or approved by the proper inspector.
(67) The inspection of the work shall not relieve the Contractor of
any of his obligations to perform sound and reliable work as herein
described. And all the work, of whatever kind, which during its
progress and before it is finally accepted may become damaged for any
cause, shall be properly taken up or removed, so much of it as may
be objectionable, and be replaced by good and sound work satisfac-
tory to the Engineer.
The courts have held that if the inspectors are clothed with the
authority usually bestowed upon engineers in construction contracts
and the work has been accepted and no fraud has been practiced
by the contractor, the city cannot recover for defective work or
materials afterwards discovered. But the failure of an inspector
to note defects, or the monthly certificates of the engineer, do not
constitute a waiver of defects in quality.
(68) And it is further agreed that if the work, or any part thereof,
or any material found or brought on the ground for use in the work,
shall be condemned by the Engineer as unsuitable or not in conformity
with the specifications, the Contractor shall forthwith remove such
materials from the work, and rebuild or otherwise remedy such work
as may be directed by the Engineer.
In order to make this clause effective, there must be definite
specifications as to the quality required. If the materials or work-
manship meet the spirit of the specifications, the engineer cannot
order changes when he finds that the results are not as good as he
wished.
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 311
(69) The Contractor shall neither bring nor allow others to bring
any spirituous or fermented liquor or other intoxicants upon the
ground occupied for the prosecution of the work. Neither shall he
furnish or allow others to furnish liquor or other intoxicants to the
workmen in his employ or to any person or persons in the vicinity.
This clause is probably not usually justifiable. The police
power of a city can deal with drunkenness, and the engineer needs
this clause only when the employment of a drunkard endangers
the quality of the work.
(70) Any workman, in the employ of the Contractor, who shall be,
in the opinion of the Engineer, either detrimental to the good of the
work by willful disobedience or careless disregard of orders, or who
shall be persistently offensive to the community where work is being
carried on, in his language or habits, shall be dismissed by the
Contractor and not again be employed.
" If the party of the first part retains the power to select and
discharge the workmen and can control them in the discharge of
their duties, it may justly be regarded as responsible for their
misconduct and negligence" and this in spite of clauses to the
contrary. The results of the work may properly be specified, and
the engineer may give directions from time to time if necessary to
secure such results, but the engineer should not retain present
control of the mode, manner, or means of doing the work. This
principle should be well established in mind before advantage is
taken of this clause. Work badly done is justification for com-
plaint by the engineer, and if the bad work is due to incompetent
workmen, the clause may be properly enforced. It is questionable
if it would be wise to insist upon the clause against profane work-
men who did their work well, but recourse should be had to city
ordinances bearing on profanity, indecent language, etc.
(71) Necessary conveniences, properly secluded from public obser-
vation, shall be constructed on the work wherever needed for the use
of the laborers.
With some contractors this is not necessary; with others it has
to be rigidly enforced by the engineer.
312 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
H. No claim for extra work shall be considered or allowed unless
the same is approved and ordered by the Engineer and the Board shall
authorize in writing such extra work. All claims for extra work done
in any month shall be made to the Engineer, in writing, before the i5th
day of the following month, or if a specific claim is not then possible, a
written notice shall be made that extra work has been done for which a
claim will be made as soon as is practicable.
And the said Contractor further agrees that if he and the said Board
are unable to agree on the value of such extra work, the said Con-
tractor will not in any way interfere with or molest such other person
or persons as the said Board may employ to do such work ; and that
the said Contractor will suspend such part of the work herein speci-
fied, or will carry on the same in such manner as may be ordered by
the said Engineer, so as to afford all reasonable facilities for doing
such extra work; and no other damages or claim by the said Con-
tractor will be allowed therefor, other than an extension of the time
specified in this contract for the performance of said suspended
work as much as the same may have been, in the opinion of the
Engineer (to be certified in writing), delayed by reason of the per-
formance of such extra work.
In spite of this clause, the courts have held that this agreement
may be rescinded by mutual consent and a new oral agreement
entered into as to changes or extras. This parol agreement to
rescind may even be inferred from the acts and declarations of the
parties. The mere fact of assenting to extra work does not
necessarily render the party of the first part liable to extra charges,
but if it has been informed or must necessarily have known from
the nature of the work that the alterations would increase the
expense, silent assent may be assumed to be an agreement to
the waiver of this clause. The request of the party of the first
part for the extra work is, however, essential. In the matter of the
second part of the clause, it is not generally wise to employ work-
men who may come in contact with, or affect in any way the work
of, the contractor or his workmen. See comment on (49). If
extra work is done under the direction of the engineer, it ought to
be entirely separate and distinct and away from the work under
contract.
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 313
I. And the said Contractor hereby further agrees to give personal
attention to the faithful prosecution of the work, and that he will not
assign or sublet the work, or any part thereof, without the previous
written consent of the Board endorsed on this agreement, but will keep
the same under his personal control, and will not assign, by power of
attorney, or otherwise, any of the moneys payable under the agree-
ment, unless by and with the like consent of the Board signified in like
manner; that no right under this contract, nor to any moneys due or to
become due hereunder, shall be asserted against the Board, or any
person acting under them, or against the city of or any represent-
ative of said city, by reason of any so-called assignment in law, or
equity, of this contract, or any part thereof, unless such assignment
shall have been authorized by the written consent of the said Board,
endorsed on this agreement; that no person, other than the party
signing this agreement as the party of the second part hereto, now has
any claim hereunder; that no claim shall be made, excepting under a
specific clause of this agreement, by any person whatever; and that
the said Contractor will punctually pay the workmen who shall be
employed on the work.
This clause is commonly inserted and almost as commonly
neglected. It has been held by the courts that if it can be proved
that the engineer knew that subcontractors were at work, and had
given estimates involving their work, a waiver of this clause was
shown. An installment of money not yet due may be assigned to
material men, for example, with due notice to the party of the
first part, and subsequent creditors of the contractor can receive
no advantage therefrom, in spite of this clause. The subject of
mechanics' liens is pertinent in this relation and an engineer
should have a general understanding of the subject. See legal
books on liens.
J. The Board reserves the right of suspending the whole or any
part of the work herein contracted to be done, if they shall deem it for
the best interests of the city of so to do, without compensation to
the Contractor for such suspension other than extending the time for
completing the work as much as it may have been delayed by such
suspension.
The courts have held that even with this clause the party of the
first part may be liable for any injury which the contractor suffers
by reason of the suspension of the work. The contractor by
3 14 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
promptly protesting against an order to suspend work puts him-
self in a better position to be awarded damages. It is manifestly
unfair, when once a contractor has put in place an expensive plant
and perhaps done a small amount of work, to suspend operations
causing direct loss to the contractor, and an arbitrary suspension
may be regarded as a breach of contract under which the con-
tractor would be entitled to recover the cost of the work actually
done with any prospective profits.
K. And the said Contractor further agrees to employ only compe-
tent, skillful men to do the work, giving preference, when other condi-
tions are equal, to the employment of residents of the city of ... .
And that whenever the Engineer shall inform said Contractor, in
writing, that any man on the work is, in his opinion, incompetent, or
unfaithful, or disorderly, such man shall be discharged from the work
and shall not again be employed on it.
See also comment on (70) of Section G.
The contractor is in any case bound by all laws and statutes of
the state and by all ordinances of the city in which the work is to
be done. Such clauses as those relating to the employment of
citizens only, to the length of a day, to payment for extra time, etc.,
he must observe without specific clauses in the contract.
L. And the said Contractor further agrees that he will commence
the work herein contracted to be done, within twenty days from the
date of this contract; that the rate of progress shall be such and that
he will so conduct the said work that on or before
the whole work covered by this contract and specifi-
cations will be entirely completed.
And if said work is not completed on said date (or within such further
time as may be allowed by the Board for such performance and
completion) the Contractor will pay to the city the cost of all engi-
neering, and all inspection and superintendence, that the Engineer
may have found it necessary to incur after the time fixed for the com-
pletion of the work, as aforesaid, all of which shall be determined by
the Engineer, and certified by him in writing, and such certificate,
when made, shall be conclusive upon the Contractor, and the Board
shall be and they are hereby authorized to deduct and retain the
amount so certified, out of the monthly approximate estimate for work
done, and out of the final estimate for the work when completed.
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 315
There is no doubt but that such a clause as this, the date being
clearly expressed, is binding on the contractor. A specified sum
as liquidated damages is usually regarded as a penalty by the courts
and will seldom be upheld. The courts prefer to inquire into the
actual value of the damages incurred, which, except for the reasons
given in this clause, are often visionary and unsatisfactory.
M. In case the said Contractor shall fail to fully and entirely, and
in conformity with the provisions and conditions of this agreement,
perform and complete the said work, and each and every part and
appurtenance thereof, within the time hereinbefore specified for such
completion, or within such further time as may be allowed by the
Board for such performance and completion, the said Contractor
shall and will pay to the city the sum of ten dollars ($10) for each and
every day that the said Contractor shall be in default, in addition to
the sum agreed to be paid for additional cost of inspection and super-
intendence, as provided in clause L hereof, which said sum of ten
dollars per day is hereby agreed upon, fixed and determined by the
parties hereto as the damages (over and above the additional cost of .
engineering, inspectors, and superintendence) which the city will
suffer by reason of such default and not by way of penalty. And the
said Board may deduct and retain said sum of ten dollars per day out
of any moneys that may be due or become due under this agreement.
If an amount stipulated as damages be so exorbitant that to
enforce its payment would be to inflict a penalty on the party in
default, instead of making good the injury sustained by reason of
the breach, it will not be enforced. If an additional compensa-
tion is allowed by the contract for completion before a certain
date, then a reduction for non-completion is proper and will hold
in law.
Waddell (" Specifications and Contracts," page 71) says that a
clause such as this is seldom enforced owing mainly to the charac-
teristic good nature of engineers and to the aversion of courts and
juries to its enforcement. The engineer objects to taking advan-
tage of a contractor who has worked faithfully but has been
unfortunate.
N. But neither an extension of time, for any reason, beyond that
fixed herein for the completion of the work, nor the doing and accept-
ance of any part of the work called for by this contract, shall be deemed
316 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
to be a waiver, by the said Board, of the right to abrogate this contract
for abandonment or delay, in the manner provided in the paragraph
marked P in this agreement.
This clause is intended to take away from the contractor the
possibility of the claim that, because he had been granted an
extension of time, or because a part of the work had been com-
pleted and accepted, therefore it was tacitly agreed that his work
was satisfactory and any operation of clause P would be without
reason. It is a delicate matter at best to legally enforce clause P
without giving the contractor a good basis for a claim for damages,
and this clause makes the operation of P more safe.
O. And the Board hereby agrees to pay or cause to be paid, and
the Contractor hereby agrees to receive the following prices, in full com-
pensation for furnishing all the materials and labor, and for com-
pleting all the work which is necessary or proper to be furnished or
performed in order to complete the entire work in the contract as
described and specified and in said specifications and plans as
described and shown, to-wit:
For about cubic yards of rock excavation in trenches
from the surface to a depth not exceeding six (6) feet, including
the disposal of the material by removal or otherwise as may be
required and all work incidental thereto, the sum of
($ )
per cubic yard.
For furnishing and laying about lineal feet of 6" cast iron
pipe, including all excavation and refilling and the disposal of all
surplus material; all handling and laying of all pipe, furnishing all
lead, yarn and other material needed for making proper joints; all
pumping or bailing or otherwise disposing of water; all protection
of water and gas pipes, bridges, culverts, drains, etc. ; all resurfacing
and repaving of streets, and all other incidental work, the sum of
(S )
per lineal foot.
For laying complete about feet of six (6) inch pipe in
trench from the surface to a depth not exceeding six (6) feet, including
excavation for manholes and other structures appertaining to the
sewers or drains and the disposal of the material by removal, or the
refilling of the trenches (rolling, ramming and watering where
required), including sheeting and shoring, bridging and fencing,
and removal of same; all pumping or bailing or otherwise disposing of
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 317
water; all protection and restoration of buildings, bridges, fences,
cisterns, culverts, drains, water and gas pipes, house drains, etc.; all
resurfacing and repaying of streets, accommodation of travel and all
other incidental work; including the furnishing of the corresponding
number of lineal feet of first quality, salt-glazed, vitrified sewer pipe
of size and quality specified, six (6) inches internal diameter, including
all haulage and storage necessary before putting pipe in trench;
including the laying of the corresponding number of lineal feet of pipe
sewer including branches or inlets, gasket and tile stoppers (cement
to be furnished by the Board), furnishing all tools, labor, and materials
except cement, the sum of
(i ,
per lineal foot.
For excavation below the sewer grade for the purpose of placing
timber, concrete or gravel foundations under the pipe to a depth not
greater than one foot below said sewer grade, the sum of
($ )
per cubic yard.
For about pounds of iron castings for manhole covers and
frames, as per detail drawings, including the furnishing all patterns
or molds necessary, the sum of
($ )
per pound.
This clause must not be omitted, since it expresses the obligation
of the party of the first part and without it there would be no
contract. Five items only are given, but there should be an
item for every unit price asked for in the work, such as each
size of pipe, excavation at different depths, concrete for different
purposes, etc.
P. The said Contractor further agrees that if the work to be done
under this agreement shall be abandoned, or if the conditions as to the
rate of progress hereinbefore specified are not fulfilled, or if this con-
tract shall be assigned by the Contractor otherwise than is hereinbefore
specified, or if at any time the Engineer shall be of the opinion, and
shall so certify in writing to the Board, that the said work or any part
thereof is unnecessarily or unreasonably delayed, or that the said Con-
tractor is violating any of the conditions or covenants of this Contract,
or executing said contract in bad faith, or if the work be not fully and
entirely completed within the time herein stipulated for its completion,
31 8 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
the said Board shall have power to notify the aforesaid Contractor to
discontinue all work or any part thereof, as said Board may designate;
and the said Board shall thereupon have the power to place such and
so many persons, and obtain by purchase, or hire, such materials,
animals, carts, wagons, implements and tools, by contract or otherwise,
as the said Board may deem necessary to complete the work herein
described, or such part thereof; and to charge the expense of said labor
and materials, animals, carts, wagons, implements and tools, to the
aforesaid Contractor. And the expense so charged shall be deducted
and paid by the city out of such moneys as either may be due, or may
at any time thereafter be due to said Contractor, under and by virtue
of this agreement, and in case such expense is less than the sum which
would have been payable under this contract if the same had been
completed by said Contractor, the Contractor shall forfeit all claim to
the difference, and in case such expense shall exceed the first sum,
then the said Contractor will pay the amount of said excess to the city
on notice of said Board of the excess so due.
Wait says that the procedure contemplated by this clause should
be used only as a last resort. Arguments, persuasion, coaxing,
and threats and almost every expedient should be used to bring
the contractor into line with the terms of his contract before this
final step is taken. It practically amounts to the annullment of
the contract by the party of the first part, which may be to the great
advantage of the contractor. Haste in the matter is certain to be
regretted, and every legitimate means should be employed to keep
the contract whole. Otherwise expensive litigation and trouble
even with the protection of this clause is almost certain to follow.
Q. And the said Contractor agrees, during the performance of the
work, to take all necessary precautions and to place proper guards for
the prevention of accidents, and to put and keep at night suitable and
sufficient lights, and to indemnify and save harmless the said parties
of the first part from all damages and costs to which they may be put
by reason of injury to the person or property of another resulting from
negligence or carelessness in the performance of the work, or on
guarding the same, or from any improper materials used in its con-
struction, or by or on account of any act or omission of the said
Contractor or the agents thereof, and the Contractor hereby agrees
that the whole or so much of the money due him under the agreement
as may be considered necessary by the Board may be retained by the
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 319
city until all suits or claims for damages, as aforesaid, have been
settled and evidence to that effect furnished, to the satisfaction of the
Board.
Even with this clause, the party of the first part cannot entirely
absolve itself from liability for injuries that ordinarily result from
the work itself. The liabilities assumed by a contractor are
usually those which can be avoided by the skillful, careful, and
prompt performance of the contract or by the foresight, experi-
ence, and knowledge which a contractor is supposed to possess.
If damages result from the performance of the work in the
manner required by the contract, and not from any negligence
on the part of the contractor, he would probably not be held
liable by the courts, even with this clause.
R. And it is further agreed by the Contractor that he will furnish
the Board with satisfactory evidence that all persons who have done
work or furnished materials under this agreement, and who may have
given written notice to the Board before or within 20 days after the final
completion and acceptance of the whole work under this contract,
that any balance for such work and materials is due and unpaid, have
been fully paid or satisfactorily secured. And in case such evidence
is not furnished, as aforesaid, such amounts as may be necessary to
meet the claims of the persons aforesaid may be retained from the
money due the Contractor until the liabilities aforesaid shall be fully
discharged or such notice withdrawn.
This clause is required by ordinance to be inserted in New York
City contracts. The right of a municipality to interpose between
employers and the persons with whom they deal for the purpose
of compelling the performance of contract obligations which the
employers and the employees have assumed has been questioned.
But there can be no doubt of the popularity of this clause in the
case of an out-of-town contractor who is inclined to neglect to pay
his local workmen and material men. See also comment on "I."
S. The said Contractor hereby further agrees that the said Board
is hereby authorized to retain, out of the moneys payable to the said
Contractor under this agreement, the sum of five per cent on the
amount of the contract, and to expend the same as provided in
320 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
clause T in making such repairs on the line of said work as the
Engineer may deem expedient.
The amount here given should vary with the character of the
work. If there is competent inspection and no opportunity for
hidden defects to show themselves there is no object in arbitrarily
retaining money which the contractor has earned. But if trenches
may settle, if a test of the work can only be had by actual trial
under working conditions, then enough money to repair possible
defects may properly be retained.
T. The said Contractor further agrees that if, at any period within
six months from the first day of or from the date of the
final completion of the work contemplated in this contract, if such final
completion be delayed beyond that date, any part of said work shall,
in the opinion of the said Engineer, require repairing, and the said
Engineer shall notify the said Contractor in person, or by mail, to
make the repairs so required, and if the said Contractor shall neglect
to make such repairs to the satisfaction of the Engineer, within five
days from the date of giving or mailing of such notice to the said
Contractor, his agent or attorney, then the said Engineer shall have
the right to employ such other persons as he may deem proper to
make the same, and the said Board shall pay the expenses thereof out
of the sum retained by it for that purpose as above mentioned. And
the said Board further agrees that, upon the expiration of the said
period of six months, provided the work at the time shall be in good
order, the Contractor shall at that time receive the whole or such
part of the sum last aforesaid as may remain after the expense of
making the said repairs, in the manner aforesaid, shall have been
paid therefrom.
Care must be taken to have the repairs under the meaning of
this clause such repairs only as are due to negligence of the con-
tractor. It would not be allowable, after a practical acceptance
of a line of sewer pipe, with no previous objection to the character
of the work, to re-excavate the trench for the purpose of improving
the joints of the pipe. The repairs needed must be obvious and
reasonable. The period of six months is a proper one for sewer
work, since it generally allows the lapse of the winter between the
final completion of the work and the final acceptance. On other
work it might be either too long or too short.
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 321
U. In order to enable the Contractor to prosecute the work advan-
tageously, the Engineer shall once a month, on or about the last day
of each month, make an estimate in writing, of the amount of work
done, and materials delivered, and of the value thereof, according
to the items of this contract. The first such estimate shall be of the
amount or quantity and value of the work done and materials delivered
since the Contractor commenced the performance of this contract on
his part. And every subsequent estimate except the final one shall
be of the amount and value of the work done since the last preceding
estimate was made. And such estimate shall not be required to be
made by strict measurements or with exactness, but this shall be
considered as approximate only. Upon such estimate being made,
the Board will thereupon pay to the Contractor eighty per cent of such
estimated value. And whenever the Contractor shall have, in the
opinion of the Engineer, completely performed this contract on his
part, the said Engineer shall so certify, in writing, to the Board and
in his certificate shall state from actual and exact measurements
the whole amount of work done by the said Contractor, and also the
value of this work according to the terms of the contract. And on the
expiration of thirty-one days after the acceptance by the Board of the
work herein agreed to be done by the Contractor, the said Board will
pay to said Contractor the amount remaining after deducting from
the amount or value named in the last mentioned certificate all such
sums as shall previously have been paid to said Contractor under any
of the provisions of the contract, and also such sums of money as by
the terms they are authorized to reserve or retain, provided that
nothing herein contained shall be construed to affect the right hereby
reserved by said Board to reject the whole or any portion of the
aforesaid work, should the said certificate be found or known to be
inconsistent with the terms of this agreement, or otherwise improperly
given.
The percentage to be paid each month should depend on the
work, whether it can be accurately measured, whether of itself it
is of value, or whether, except as a part of the completed work, it is
preparatory and incomplete in nature. A higher percentage may
be paid for material than for labor. The engineer should not
yield to importunities of the contractor for a large estimate on any
occasion, since retribution for such partiality is sure to follow. It
is especially unfortunate to have allowed the estimates to overrun
if the work should be suspended or the contract broken.
322 SEWER CONSTRUCTION
V. The said Contractor further agrees not to demand or be
entitled to receive payment for the aforesaid work or materials except
in entire accordance with the manner set forth in the agreement, nor
unless each and every one of the promises, agreements, specifications,
forms and conditions herein set forth to be observed by said Contractor
have been so far kept, observed and fulfilled; and the said Engineer
shall have given his certificate to that effect, and the Board shall have
accepted his work.
This is in effect saying that the contractor agrees to be bound
by the terms of his contract, an entirely unnecessary statement.
The clause is apparently superfluous, but is a proper legal provi-
sion to secure a prior performance on the part of the contractor,
and to absolve the party of the first part from any obligation
until after the performance by the party of the second part.
W. It is further expressly understood and agreed by and between
the parties hereto, that the action of the Engineer by which the said
Contractor is to be bound and concluded according to the contract
shall be that evidenced by this final certificate; all prior payments
being made merely upon estimates subject to the correction of such
final certificate; which final certificate may be made without notice to
the Contractor thereof, or by the measurements upon which the same
is based.
Wait says that however much doubt there may be that a con-
tractor can agree to abide the decision of an engineer, and that his
decision shall be final, it is fully settled that he can make the
payment for his work dependent upon the occurrence of some
event; and a person may covenant that no right to payment shall
accrue to the contractor and no liability attach to the company
until a third person (engineer) has decided the amount due. If
the contractor believes the certificate to be withheld by fraud,
impossibility of performance, hindrance by the city, inducements
to the engineer, or a refusal to act on the part of the engineer, he
may appeal to the courts and if his belief is substantiated, recover
at law.
X. And it is hereby expressly agreed and understood by and
between the parties hereto, that the said Board shall not, nor shall any
department or office of the city of , be precluded or estopped
CONTRACT AND SPECIFICATIONS 323
by any return or certificate made, or given, by any Engineer, inspector,
or other officer, agent or appointee of said Board, or said party of the
first part, under or in pursuance of anything in this agreement
contained, from at any time showing the true and correct amount and
character of the work which shall have been done, and materials
which shall have been furnished by the said Contractor or by any
other person or persons under this agreement.
This clause is hardly necessary, since if the party of the first
part can show that the certificate of the engineer has been fraudu-
lently given they would not be bound in any case. Otherwise
the engineer's certificate, made honestly, though inexactly, has been
held to be equally conclusive upon both parties. If for example his
certificate includes extra work it is binding and conclusive, although
the extra work may not have been ordered in writing as required
by the contract. Since the engineer's certificate is in the nature
of an arbitrator's award, it is generally held that he cannot revise
it. If a mistake is found, a court of equity on application of the
engineer or by suit may recommit the award to the engineer, or
both parties may agree to abandon the award and resubmit the
questions to the decision of another engineer. If there is no fault
on the part of the engineer and a mistake is one arising from error
in judgment, the certificate cannot be recalled.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said city of , by its Board of
Sewer Commissioners duly authorized, has caused these presents to be
signed, and has hereunto set its corporate seal as party of the first
part, and the said part of the second part ha also
hereunto set hand.. and seal.., and said city of ...., and
part hereto of the second part, have executed this agreement in
triplicate; one part of which is to remain with said Board, one other
to be filed with the Clerk of the city of . . . • , and the third to be
delivered to said party of the second part; the day and year herein
first written.
Board of Sewer Commissioners.
Contractor.
Signed and sealed in the presence of
Witnesses.
INDEX
PAGE
Adams, tests of pipe 13
Advantages of terra-cotta sewer pipe 2
three-foot pipe lengths 10
Altoona, brick and concrete sewer at 70
Analyses of sewer pipe clay. . 3
Archer joint 26
Area of screens 1 53
Asphalt joints 25
Auburn, cover for lamphole 112
manhole at 104
Babcock's invert block 33
Ball and socket joints 23
Barbour's experiments on earth pressure 37
strength of pipe 16
Bell mouths 185
alternate construction for 193
at Philadelphia 187
at Providence 191
near Boston 187
Binghamton, outlet sewer at 212
Birmingham, screen at 168
Blaw sections of concrete sewers 63
Bond for brick sewers 48
Boston, automatic regulator at 178
bell mouth near 187
catch-basin at 123
pile foundation at 203
screen chamber at 154
sewer outlet at 217
Bottoms of manholes 90
Bowser, alternate construction for bell mouths 193
Boxing in pipe against frost 137
Branches for house drains 227
Breslau, direct siphon at 135
Brick and concrete aqueduct at Boston 74
sewer at Altoona 70
sewer at Medford 68
sewer at Melbourne 70
325
326 INDEX
PAGE
Brick and concrete sewer on platform 69
Brick for brick sewers 29
sewers 29
Bricks required for sewers 34
Brickwork, cost of 270
Bridge for crossing gully 135
Brockville, failure of manhole at 90
Brookline, automatic regulator at 182
Brooklyn, section of brick sewer at 47
Buenos Ayres, direct siphon at 148
inverted siphon at 147
Burlington, catch-basin at 127
sewer outlet at 222
Cambridge, pile foundation at 198
Caps for Y connections 228
Carson trenching machine 248
Castings for manhole covers 104
Catch-basins 113
at Boston 1 23
at Burlington 127
at Columbus 121
at Louisville 130
at Michigan city 122
at Peoria 125
at Philadelphia 128
at Providence 122
at Washington 130
at Wilmington 124
cleaning of 132
gratings for inlets to 116
size of 116
traps in 119
Cement joints in sewer pipe 20
sewer pipes 54
Chenoweth process for concrete sewers 52
Chicago section of concrete sewer 57
Cleaning of catch-basins 132
Cleveland, deep manhole at 102
overflow weir at 174
reinforced concrete sewer at 88
Cloth used with cement joints 26
Coffin's support for pipe joints 21
Coffin Valve Company, automatic regulator of 182
Coldwater, arch blocks for sewer at 56
Columbus, catch-basin at 121
screens at 169
INDEX 327
PAGE
Composition of sewer pipe 2
Concentrated load test on sewer pipe 15
Concrete and brick sewers 67
Concrete, cost of 271
for sewer foundation 197
Y branches 228
pipe, porosity of 55
sewers 52
sewer section at Chicago 57
New York 57
Swampscott 63
Truro 61
Victoria 59
Washington 57
sewer sections of Blaw Collapsible Steel Centering Co '. . . . 63
Concrete steel, see Reinforced concrete.
Construction of brick sewer 50
Contract and specifications 279
Contractor's profit 277
Corrugations on sewer pipe 7, 12
Cost of brickwork 270
cement pipe 56
concrete 271
earthwork 258
engineering 278
flush tanks 277
manholes 275
mortar 270
rock excavation 262
sewer pipe 267
sheeting 265
tunnel excavation 266
Cover for lamphole 112
Covers for manholes 102
Cradle for brick sewer 51
sewer foundations 196
Cranston, screen at 161
Cross-section of manholes 90
Croyden, Eng., failure of pipes at n
Deep sewers, house connections with 230
Density of concrete for sewers 63
Denver section of brick sewer 46
Depth of drill holes 255
Des Moines, reinforced concrete sewer at Si
Die for sewer pipe 6
Dirt pans under manhole covers 109
328 INDEX
PAGE
Drilling in rock 254
Drop tests on sewer pipe 15
Earth pressure on sewer arch 37
Egg-shaped pipe 8
Engineering, cost of 278
Estimates and costs 257
Estimates, preparation of 241
Excavation, cost of 258
estimate of 242
Experiments on strength of pipe 13
Explosives 256
Failure of bell mouth at Nashville 193
manhole at Brockville 90
walls 94
pipe at Cambridge 18
Halifax 18
Oberlin 19
Toronto 18
Floor area of manholes 93
Flush tanks, cost of 277
Form of notes 240
Forms for concrete sewer at Medford 68
New York 59
South Bend 85
sewers at Chicago 57
Swampscott 63
Truro 63
Victoria 61
of steel ribbon 52
Formula for the thickness of pipe 16
Foundation for manhole 06
Foundations 195
Frames and covers for manholes 102
Frost, to protect pipes against 137
Fuertes, manhole cover designed by 1 04
Glaze on sewer pipe 8
Grade boards for sewer construction 238
Grade of house drains 230
Gratings for storm water inlets 1 16
Gravel for pipe foundations 105
Harrisburg, automatic regulator at 180
reinforced concrete sewer at 79
Hassal joint 26
INDEX 329
PAGE
Hastings on failure of pipes ......................... jg
Hering, bridge for crossing gully, designed by .......................... 137
lock for manhole, designed by ........................ IO8
House connections ................................................... 22y
drains, grade of .......................................... 230
size of ................................................ 229
traps on ............................................... 230
Howe, tests of sewer pipe ............................................ ^
Hydrostatic tests of pipe ........................................... !^
Inlets for catch-basins ............................................... j ! •?
Inlet to storm sewer at Warsaw ....................................... 130
Tarrytown ..................................... 131
Intersection of manhole and sewer ..................................... 06
sewers ................................................ 185
Invert blocks ....................................................... 30
Ithaca, dirt pans at ................................................. 109
inverted siphon at .............................. ............ 147, 151
lock for manhole at ........................................... 108
outfall sewer at .............................................. 220
rod screen at ................................................. 164
screen chamber at. . . ......................................... 154
Jackson Reinforced Pipe Company .................................... 75
Jersey City reinforced concrete aqueduct ............................... 79
Joints made on bank ................................................ 21
of asphalt .................................................... 25
pine tar .................................................... 25
sulphur and sand ........................................... 22, 24
Junction chamber at Minneapolis ..................................... 193
Keating on failure of pipe ............................................ 18
Kilns for sewer pipe manufacture ..................................... 7
Lampholes ......................................................... in
Latham's formula for thickness ....................................... 36
invert block ............................................... 31
Leakage through cement joints ........... ............................. 21 .
concrete pipes ....................................... 55
Leaping weir at Milwaukee ........................................... 172
Leaping weir, theory of .............................................. 172
Length of sewer pipe ................................................ 10
Lidgerwood cableway ........................................... ..... 250
Location of manholes ............................................... 89, 236
storm water inlets ........................................ 113
Y branches .............................................. 229
330 INDEX
PAGE
Locks for manhole covers 107
at Ithaca 108
Salt Lake City 109
Los Angeles, inverted siphon at 148
sewer outlet at 223
Louisville, catch-basin at 130
Lynn, pile foundation at 199
Manchester, screen chamber at 157
Manhole cover at Auburn 104
Manholes 89
Manhole at Cleveland 102
Melbourne 101
bottoms of 90
cost of 275
cover at Santos 104
cross-sections of 90
dirt pans under covers 109
failure of walls of 94
floor area of 93
for sewers on different levels 97
shallow sewers 90
foundation for 9^
frames and covers 102
location on sewer line 235
locks for covers i°7
on large brick sewers 96
Sessions Iron Foundry cover 104
thickness of walls of 94
Manilla, timber foundation for sewer at 196
Map for sewer location 235
Marlborough, screen at 160
Maximum and minimum strength of pipe 17
Medford, brick and concrete sewer at 68
Melbourne, brick and concrete sewer at 7°
deep manhole at I01
Mesh for screens l63
Mexico, reinforced concrete aqueduct at 75
Michigan City, catch-basin at I22
Milwaukee, leaping weir at 1 ~2
Minneapolis, junction chamber at J93
Moore machine 252
Moore's design for outfall sewer 212
theory of leaping weir J72
Mortar, cost of 27°
Mortar for brick sewers 5°
INDEX 331
PAGE
Nashville, failure of bell mouth at 193
Newark, plate screen at 164
New London, sewer outlet at 220
New Orleans, inverted siphon at 140
section of brick sewer 45
New Rochelle, sewer outlet at 220
Newton, failure of sewer at 36
inverted siphon at 140
New York, inverted siphon at 146
pile foundation at 204
reinforced concrete sewer at 80
section of concrete sewer 57
sewer outlet at 217
Niagara Falls, outfall sewer at 212
Norfolk, direct siphon at 133
Notes for sewer construction 240
Number of bricks in sewers 34
house connections 227
Oakland, concrete conduits at 53
Offset line to sewer 237
Old Orchard Beach, outfall sewer at 222
Ontario Insane Hospital, screen at 166
Ottawa section of brick sewer 45
Outfall sewers 211
at Binghamton 212
at Boston 217
at Burlington 222
at Ithaca 221
at Los Angeles 223
at New London 220
at New Rochelle 220
at Niagara Falls 212
at New York 217
at Old Orchard Beach 222
at Philadelphia 214
at Spring Lake 220
at Toronto 223
designed by Moore 212
Overflows for storm water 17°
Overflow weir at Cleveland i?4
at Providence 176
at Rochester 170, *77
Parker on failure of pipe 18
Paving brick for invert 30
332 INDEX
PAGE
Peoria, catch-basin at 125
Philadelphia, bell-mouth at 187
catch-basin at 1 28
reinforced concrete sewer at 82
sewer outlet at 214
sections of masonry 38
Pile foundation at Boston 203
Cambridge 198
Lynn 199
New York 204
St. Paul 206
Troy 199
Piles for sewer foundation 198
Pine tar joints 25
Pipes, cost of 267
Pipes for sewers, see Sewer pipe.
Plank for pipe foundations 195
Plates, perforated for screens 164
Platform for sewer foundation 196
foundation at Manilla 196
Providence, bell-mouth at 171
catch-basin at 122
inverted siphon at 149
overflow weir *at 176
reinforced concrete sewer at 76
screen chamber at 1 59
wooden screen at 167
Portland, Me., sewer pipe plant at 2
Potter machine 252
on failure of pipe 19
Press for sewer pipe 6
Profit of contractor 277
Pug mill for pipe manufacture 3
Pullman, screen at 167
Ramsome process for concrete sewers
Richmond, screen at 167
Records of house connections 229
Y branches
Regulator at Boston 1 78
Brookline 182
Harrisburg 180
Worcester 180
of Coffin Valve Company 182
Reinforced concrete sewers 75
at Cleveland 88
aqueduct at Jersey City 79
INDEX 333
PAGE
Reinforced concrete aqueduct, Mexico 75
sewer at Des Moines 81
sewer at Harrisburg 79
sewer at New York 80
sewer at Philadelphia 82
sewer at Providence 76
sewer at St. Louis 82
sewer at South Bend 85
sewer at Wilmington 76
Roanoke, inverted siphon at 140
Rochester, overflow weir at 170, 177
sections of brick sewers 47
Rock excavation, cost of 262
Rock trenches, house connections in 233
Rock trenching 252
Rods for screens 164
Roll mill for pipe manufacture 4
Rowlock bond for brick sewers 48
Rust on failure of pipe 18
Saddle piles 198
St. Louis, manufacture of sewer pipe at 2
reinforced concrete sewer at 82
steps in sewer at 101
St. Paul, pile foundation at 206
Salt, used in pipe kilns 8
Salt Lake City, lock for manhole at 109
Santos, manhole cover at 104
Screens 153
at Birmingham 168
at Columbus 169
at Cranston 161
at Ithaca 164
at Marlborough 161
at Newark 164
at Ontario Insane Hospital 166
at Providence 167
at Pullman 167
at Richmond ' 167
at Wayne 163
at White Plains 160
at Worcester State Hospital 164
Screen chambers 154
at Boston 154
at Ithaca 154
at Manchester 157
at Providence 159
334 INDEX
PAGE
Sections of Philadelphia sewers 38
Sessions Foundry Co., manhole cover of 104
Settlement of sewer embankment 208
Sewer pipe, advantages of 2
analysis of material for 3
composition of 2
length of 10
sizes of 10
thickness of 10
Shedd, tests of pipe 13
Sheeting, cost of 265
Sheeting for trenches 246
Shrinking of pipes in burning 8
Siphons 133
at Breslau 135
at Buenos Ayres 147
at Ithaca 147
at Los Angeles 148
at New Orleans 140
at Newton 140
at New York 146
at Norfolk 133
at Providence 149
at Roanoke 140
at Springfield 142
at Woonsocket 142
Size of catch-basins 1 16
Size of house drains 229
Sizes of pipe 10
Slants for house connections 228
Sockets, sizes of 1 1
South Bend, reinforced concrete sewer at 85
thickness of sewer at 36
Specifications, forms of 286
Spikes to mark offset line 237
Springfield, inverted siphon at 142
thickness of sewer at 36
Spring Lake, sewer outlet at 220
Stanford joints 22
Steel outfall sewer at Toronto 223
Steps in sewer at manhole 101
Storm water overflows i?°
Strap iron bond for brick sewers 5°
Strength of double strength pipe 16
Strength of standard pipe 16
Sudbury river aqueduct . . . 74
Sulphur and sand joints 22, 24
INDEX 335
PAGE
Surveying 235
Swampscott section of concrete sewer 63
Sykes joint 26
Table of reinforcement for cement pipes 76
Table of socket space 12
Table of thickness of pipe n
Talbot's invert block 30
Tarrytown, storm water inlet at 131
Temperature of pipe kilns 8
Tensile strength of vitrified clay 14
Thickness of brick sewers 35
Thickness of cement pipe 56
Thickness of manhole walls 94
Thickness of sewer pipe 10
Toronto, steel outfall sewer at 223
Trap in catch-basin at Columbus 121
for catch-basins 119
on house drain 230
Trenching 245
Troy, pile foundation at 199
Truro section of concrete sewer 61
Tunnel excavation, cost of 266
Uniform load tests on sewer pipe 15
U. S. G. S. experiments on concrete pipe 55
Victoria section of concrete sewer 59
Warsaw, storm water inlet at 130
Washington, catch-basin at 130
Washington sections of brick sewers 45
Washington sections of concrete sewers 57
Wayne, screen at 163
White Plains, screen at 160
Width of trench 245
Wilmington, catch-basin at 124
reinforced concrete sewer at 76
Woburn, automatic regulator at 185
Wooden pipes for outfall sewer 220
Woonsocket, inverted siphon at 142
Worcester, automatic regulator 180
Worcester State Hospital, screen at 164
Y branches, records of 243
SHORT-TITLE CATALOGUE
OF THE
PUBLICATIONS
OF
JOHN WILEY & SONS,
NEW YORK,
LONDON: CHAPMAN & HALL, LIMITED.
ARRANGED UNDER SUBJECTS.
Descriptive circulars sent on application. Books marked with an asterisk (*) are sold
at net prices only. All books are bound in cloth unless otherwise stated.
AGRICULTURE— HORTICULTURE— FORESTRY.
Armsby's Manual of Cattle-feeding 121110, Si 75
Principles of Animal Nutrition 8vo, 4 oo
Budd and Hansen's American Horticultural Manual:
Part I. Propagation, Culture, and Improvement. i2mo, i 50
Part II. Systematic Pomology t 121110, i 50
Elliott's Engineering for Land Drainage i2mo, i 50
Practical Farm Drainage i2mo. i oo
Graves's Forest Mensuration 8vo, 4 oo
Green's Principles of American Forestry i2mo, i 50
Grotenfelt's Principles of Modern Dairy Practice. (WolL) I2mo, 2 oo
* Herrick's Denatured or Industrial Alcohol 8vo, 400
Kemp and Waugh's Landscape Gardening. (New Edition, Rewritten. In
Preparation).
* McKay and Larsen's Principles and Practice of Butter-making 8vo. i 50
Maynard's Landscape Gardening as Applied to Home Decoration i2mo, i 50
Quaintance and Scott's Insects and Diseases of Fruits. (In Preparation).
Sanderson's Insects Injurious to Staple Crops I2mo, i 50
*Schwarz's Longleaf Pine in Virgin Forests iztno, i 25
Stockbridge's Rocks and Soils 8vo, 2 50
Winton's Microscopy of Vegetable Foods 8vo, 7 50
WolTs Handbook for Farmers and Dairymen i6mo, i 50
ARCHITECTURE.
Baldwin's Steam Heating for Buildings I2mo, 2 50
Berg's Buildings and Structures of American Railroads 4to, 5 oo
Birkmire's Architectural Iron and Steel 8vo, 3 50
Compound Riveted Girders as Applied in Buildings 8vo, 2 oo
Planning and Construction of American Theatres 8vo, 3 oo
Planning and Construction of High Office Buildings 8vo, 3 50
Skeleton Construction in Buildings 8vo, 3 oo
Briggs's Modern American School Buildings 8vo, 4 oo
Byrne's Inspection of Material and Wormanship Employed in Construction.
i6mo, 3 oo
Carpenter's Heating and Ventilating of Buildings 8vo, 4 oo
Freitag's Architectural Engineering. . . 8vo 3 50
Fireproofmg of Steel Buildings 8vo, 50
French and Ives's Stereotomy 8vo, 50
Gerhard's Guide to Sanitary House-Inspection i6mo,
*
Modern Baths and Bath Houses 8vo,
Sanitation of Public Buildings i2mo>
Theatre Fires and Panics i2mo,
Holley and Ladd's Analysis of Mixed Paints, Color Pigments, and Varnishes
Large 12 mo, 2 5o
Johnson's Statics by Algebraic and Graphic Methods 8vo, 2 oo
Kellaway's How to Lay Out Suburban Home Grounds 8vo, 2 oo
Kidder's Architects' and Builders' Pocket-book i6mo, mor. 5 oo
Maire's Modern Pigments and their Vehicles i2mo, 2 oo
Merrill's Non-metallic Minerals: Their Occurrence and Uses 8vo, 4 oo
Stones for Building and Decoration 8vo, 5 oo
Monckton's Stair-building 4to, 4 oo
Patton's Practical Treatise on Foundations 8vo, 5 oo
Peabody's Naval Architecture 8vo, 7 50
Rice's Concrete-block Manufacture 8vo, 2 oo
Richey's Handbook for Superintendents of Construction i6mo, mor. 4 oo
* Building Mechanics' Ready Reference Book:
* Building Foreman's Pocket Book and Ready Reference. (In
Press.)
* Carpenters' and Woodworkers' Edition i6mo, mor.
* Cement Workers and Plasterer's Edition i6mo, mor.
* Plumbers', Steam-Filters', and Tinners' Edition .... i6mo, mor.
* Stone- and Brick-masons' Edition i6mo, mor.
Sabin's House Painting 12 mo,
Industrial and Artistic Technology of Paints and Varnish 8vo, 3 oo
Siebert and Biggin's Modern Stone-cutting and Masonry 8vo, i 50
Snow's Principal Species of Wood 8vo, 3 50
Towne's Locks and Builders' Hardware iSmo, mor, 3 oo
Wait's Engineering and Architectural Jurisprudence 8vo, 6 oo
Sheep, 6 50
Law of Contracts 8vo, 3 oo
Law of Operations Preliminary to Construction in Engineering and Archi-
tecture. 8vo, 5 oo
Sheep, 5 SO
Wilson's Air Conditioning i2mo, i 50
Worcester and Atkinson's Small Hospitals, Establishment and Maintenance,
Suggestions for Hospital Architecture, with Plans for a Small Hospital
1 2 mo, i 25
ARMY AND NAVY.
Seniadou's Smokeless Powder, Nitro-cellulose, and the Theory of the Cellulose
Molecule I2mo, 2 50
Chase's Art of Pattern Making i2mo, 2 50
Screw Propellers and Marine Propulsion 8vo, 3 oo
* Cloke's Enlisted Specialist's Examiner 8vo, 2 oo
Gunner's Examiner 8vo, i 50
Craig's Azimuth 4to, 3 50
Crehore and Squier's Polarizing Photo-chronograph 8vo, 3 oo
* Davis's Elements of Law 8vo, 2 50
* Treatise on the Military Law of United States 8vo, 7 oo
Sheep 7 50
De Brack's Cavalry Outpost Duties. (Carr) 24mo, mor. 2 oo
* Dudley's Military Law and the Procedure of Courts-martial.. . Large i2mo, 2 50
Durand's Resistance and Propulsion of Ships 8vo, 5 oo
* Dyer's Handbook of Light Artillery i2mo, 3 oo
Eissler's Modern High Explosives 8vo, 4 oo
* Fiebeger's Text-book on Field Fortification Large i2mo, 2 oo
Hamilton and Bond's The Gunner's Catechism i8mo, i oo
* Hoff 's Elementary Naval Tactics 8vo, r 50
Ingalls's Handbook of Problems in Direct Fire. 8vo, 4 oo
* Lissak's Ordnance and Gunnery 8vo, 6 oo
* Ludlow's Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables 8vo, i oo
* Lyons's Treatise on Electromagnetic Phenomena. Vols. I. and II.. 8vo, each, 6 oo
* Mahan's Permanent Fortifications. (Mercur) 8vo, half mor. 7 50
Manual for Courts-martial i6mo, mor. i 50
* Mercur's Attack of Fortified Places I2mo, 2 oo
* Elements of the Art of War 8vo, 4 oo
Metcalf's Cost of Manufactures — And the Administration of Workshops. .8vo, 5 oo
Nixon's Adjutants' Manual 24mo, i oo
Peabody's Naval Architecture 8vo, 7 50
* Phelps's Practical Marine Surveying 8vo, 2 50
Putnam's Nautical Charts 8vo, 2 oo
Sharpe's Art of Subsisting Armies in War , i8mo, mor. i 50
* Tupes and Poole's Manual of Bayonet Exercises and Musketry Fencing.
24010, leather, 50
* Weaver's Military Explosives 8vo, 3 oo
Woodhull's Notes on Military Hygiene. i6mo, x 50
ASSAYING.
Betts's Lead Refining by Electrolysis 8vo, 4 oo
Fletcher's Practical Instructions in Quantitative Assaying with the Blowpipe.
1 6 mo, mor. i 50
Furman's Manual of Practical Assaying v 8vo, 3 oo
Lodge's Notes on Assaying and Metallurgical Laboratory Experiments .... 8vo, 3 oo
Low's Technical Methods of Ore Analysis 8vo, 3 oo
Miller's Cyanide Process i2mo, i oo
Manual of Assaying I2mo, i oo
Minet's Production of Aluminum and its Industrial Use. (Waldo) i2mo, 2 50
O'Driscoll's Notes on the Treatment of Gold Ores 8vo, 2 oo
Ricketts and Miller's Notes on Assaying 8vo, 3 oo
Robine and Lenglen's Cyanide Industry. (Le Clerc) 8vo, 4 oo
Ulke's Modern Electrolytic Copper Refining , 8vo, 3 oo
Wilson's Chlorination Process i2mo, i 50
Cyanide Processes I2mo r 50
ASTRONOMY.
Comstock's Field Astronomy for Engineers 8vo, 2 50
Craig's Azimuth 4to, 3 50
Crandall's Text-book on Geodesy and Least Squares 8vo, 3 oo
Doolittle's Treatise on Practical Astronomy 8vo, 4 oo
Gore's Elements of Geodesy 8vo, 2 50
Hayford's Text-book of Geodetic Astronomy 8vo, 3 oo
Merriman's Elements of Precise Surveying and Geodesy. 8vo, 2 50
* Michie and Harlow's Practical Astronomy 8vo, 3 oo
Rust's Ex-meridian Altitude, Azimuth and Star- Finding Tables 8vo, 5 oo
* White's Elements of Theoretical and Descriptive Astronomy i2mo, 2 oo
CHEMISTRY.
* Abderhalden's Physiological Chemistry in Thirty Lectures. (Hall and Defren)
8vo, 5 oo
* Abegg's Theory of Electrolytic Dissociation, (von Ende) izmo, i 25
Alexeyeff's General Principles of Organic Syntheses. (Matthews) 8vo, 3 oo
Allen's Tables for Iron Analysis 8vo, 3 oo
Arnold's Compendium of Chemistry. (Mandel 1 Large i2mo, 3 50
Association of State and National Food and Dairy Departments, Hartford,
Meeting, 1906 8vo, 3 oo
Jamestown Meeting, 1907 8vo, 3 oo
Austen's Notes for Chemical Students i2mo, i 50
Baskerville's Chemical Elements. (In Preparation.)
Bernadou's Smokeless Powder. — Nitro-cellulose, and Theory of the Cellulose
Molecule i2mo- 2 50
Biltz's Chemical Preparations. (Hall and Blanchard). (In Press.)
* Blanchard's Synthetic Inorganic Chemistry i2mo, i oo
* Browning's Introduction to the Rarer Elements 8vo, i 50
Brush and Penfield's Manual of Determinative Mineralogy 8vo, 4 oo
* Claassen's Beet-sugar Manufacture. (Hall and Rolfe) 8vo, 3 oo
Classen's Quantitative Chemical Analysis by Electrolysis. (Boltwood).. .8vo, 3 oo
Cohn's Indicators and Test-papers i2mo, 2 oo
Tests and Reagents 8vo, 3 oo
* Danneel's Electrochemistry. (Merriam) i2mo, i 25
Dannerth's Methods of Textile Chemistry i2mo, 2 oo
Duhem's Thermodynamics and Chemistry. (Burgess) 8vo, 4 oo
Eakle's Mineral Tables for the Determination of Minerals by their Physical
Properties 8vo, i 25
Eissler's Modern High Explosives 8vo, 4 oo
Effront's Enzymes and their Applications. (Prescott) 8vo, 3 oo
Erdmann's Introduction to Chemical Preparations. (Dunlap) i2mo, i 25
* Fischer's Physiology of Alimentation Large i2mo, 2 oo
Fletcher's Practical Instructions in Quantitative Assaying with the Blowpipe.
I2mo, mor. i 50
Fowler's Sewage Works Analyses i2mo, 2 oo
Fresenius's Manual of Qualitative Chemical Analysis. (Wells). 8vo, 5 oo
Manual of Qualitative Chemical Analysis. Part I. Descriptive. (Wells) 8vo, 3 oo
Quantitative Chemical Analysis. (Cohn) 2 vols 8vo, 12 50
When Sold Separately, Vol. I, $6. Vol. II, $8.
Fuertes's Water and Public Health I2mo, i 50
Furman's Manual of Practical Assaying 8vo, 3 oo
* Getman's Exercises in Physical Chemistry i2mo, 2 oo
Gill's Gas and Fuel Analysis for Engineers i2mo, i 25
* Gooch and Browning's Outlines of Qualitative Chemical Analysis.
Large i2mo, i 25
Grotenfelt's Principles of Modern Dairy Practice. (Woll) i2mo, 2 oo
Groth's Introduction to Chenrcal Crystallography (Marshall) i2mo, i 25
Hammarsten's Text-book of Physiological Chemistry. (Mandel) 8vo, 4 oo
Hanausek's Microscopy of Technical Products. (Winton) 8vo, 5 oo
* Haskins and Macleod's Organic Chemistry izmo, 2 oo
Helm's Principles of Mathematical Chemistry. (Morgan) i2mo, i 50
Bering's Ready Reference Tables (Conversion Factors) i6mo, mor. 2 50
* Herrick's Denatured or Industrial Alcohol 8vo, 4 oo
Hinds's Inorganic Chemistry 8vo, 3 oo
* Laboratory Manual for Students I2mo, i oo
* Holleman's Laboratory Manual of Organic Chemistry for Beginners.
(Walker) 12m°. x °°
Text-book of Inorganic Chemistry. (Cooper) 8vo, 2 50
Text-book of Organic Chemistry. (Walker and Mott) 8vo, 2 50
4
olley and Ladd's Analysis of Mixed Paints, Color Pigments, and Varnishes.
Large 12 mo, 2 50
Hopkins's Oil-chemists' Handbook 8vo, 3 oo
Iddings's Rock Minerals 8yo, 5 oo
Jackson's Directions for Laboratory Work in Physiological Chemistry. .8vo, I 25
Johannsen's Determination of Rock-forming Minerals in Thin Sections. . .8vo, 4 oo
Johnson's Chemical Analysis of Special Steel. Steel-making. (Alloys and
Graphite.) (In Press.)
Keep's Cast Iron 8vo, 2 50
Ladd's Manual of Quantitative Chemical Analysis I2mo, i oo
i,andauer's Spectrum Analysis. (Tingle) 8vo, 3 oo
* ^angworthy and Austen's Occurrence of Aluminium in Vegetable Prod-
ucts, Animal Products, and Natural Waters 8vo, 2 oo
Lassar-Cohn's Application of Some General Reactions to Investigations in
Organic Chemistry. (Tingle) i2mo, i oo
Leach's Inspection and Analysis of Food with Special Reference to State
Control 8vo, 7 50
Lob's Electrochemistry of Organic Compounds. (Lorenz) 8vo, 3 oo
Lodge's Notes on Assaying and Metallurgical Laboratory Experiments. .. .8vo, 3 oo
Low's Technical Method of Ore Analysis 8vo, 3 oo
Lunge's Techno-chemical Analysis. (Cohn) i2mo, i oo
* McKay and Larsen's Principles and Practice of Butter-making 8vo, i 50
Maire's Modern Pigments and their Vehicles i2mo, 2 oo
Mandel's Handbook for Bio-chemical Laboratory i2mo. i 50
* Martin's Laboratory Guide to Qualitative Analysis with the Blowpipe . . i2mo, 60
Mason's Examination of Water. (Chemical and Bacteriological.) .. . i2mo, i 25
Water-supply. (Considered Principally from a Sanitary Standpoint.
8vo, 4 oo
Mathewson's Chemical Theory for First Year College Students. (In Press).
Matthews's Textile Fibres. 2d Edition, Rewritten 8vo, 4 oo
* Meyer's Determination of Radicle? in Carbon Compounds. (Tingle). . i2mo, 25
Miller's Cyanide Process : I2mo, oo
Manual of Assaying i2mo, oo
Minet's Production of Aluminum and its Industrial Use. (Waldo) i2mo, 50
Mixter's Elementary Text-book of Chemistry I2mo, 50
Morgan's Elements of Physical Chemistry I2mo, oo
Outline of the Theory of Solutions and its Results I2mo, oo
* Physical Chemistry for Electrical Engineers i2mo, 50
Morse's Calculations used in Cane-sugar Factories i6mo, mor. 50
* Muir's History of Chemical Theories and Laws 8vo, 4 oo
Mulliken's General Method for the Identification of Pure Organic Compounds.
Vol. I Large 8vo, 5 oo
O'Driscoll's Notes on the Treatment of Gold Ores 8vo, 2 oo
Ostwald's Conversations on Chemistry. Part One. (Ramsey) I2mo, i 50
Part Two. (TurnbuU) i2mo, 2 oo
* Palmer's Practical Test Book of Chemistry i2mo, i oo
* Pauli's Physical Chemistry in the Service of Medicine. (Fischer") I2mo, i 25
* Penfield's Notes on Determinative Mineralogy and Record of Mineral Tests.
8vo, paper, 50
Tables of Minerals, Including the Use of Minerals and Statistics of
Domestic Production 8vo, i oo
Pictet's Alkaloids and their Chemical Constitution. (Biddle). . 8vo, 5 oo
Poole's Calorific Power of Fuels 8vo, 3 oo
Prescott and Winslow's Elements of Water Bacteriology, with Special Refer-
ence to Sanitary Water Analysis i2mo, i 50
* Reisig's Guide to Piece-dyeing 8vo, 25 oo
Richards and Woodman's Air, Water, and Food from a Sanitary Standpoint.. 8 vo, 2 oo
Ricketts and Miller's Notes on Assaying 8vo, 3 oo
Rideal's Disinfection and the Preservation of Food 8vo, 4 oo
Sewage and the Bacterial Purification of Sewage 8vo, 4 oo
5
Riggs's Elementary Manual for the Chemical Laboratory 8vo, i 25
Robine and Lenglen's Cyanide Industry. (Le Clerc) 8vo, 4 oo
Ruddiman's Incompatibilities in Prescriptions 8vo, 2 oo
Whys in Pharmacy J2mo, i oo
Ruer's Elements of Metallography. (Mathewson) (In Preparation.)
Sabin's Industrial and Artistic Technology of Paints and Varnish 8vo, 3 oo
Salkowski's Physiological and Pathological Chemistry. (Orndorff) Svo, 2 50
Schimpf's Essentials of Volumetric Analysis i2mo, i 25
* Qualitative Chemical Analysis Svo, i 25
Text-book of Volumetric Analysis I2mo, 2 50
Smith's Lecture Notes on Chemistry for Dental Students 8vo, 2 50
Spencer's Handbook for Cane Sugar Manufacturers i6mo, mor. 3 oo
Handbook for Chemists of Beet-sugar Houses i6mo, mor. 3 oo
Stockbridge's Rocks and Soils 8vo, 2 50
* Tillman's Descriptive General Chemistry 8vo, 3 oo
* Elementary Lessons in Heat 8vo, i 50
Treadwell's Qualitative Analysis. (Hall) f 8vo, 3 oo
Quantitative Analysis. (Hall) 8vo, 4 oo
Turneaure and Russell's Public Water-supplies 8vo, 5 oo
Van Deventer's Physical Chemistry for Beginners. (Boltwood) i2mo, i 50
Venable's Methods and Devices for Bacterial Treatment of Sewage Svo, 3 oo
Ward and Whipple's Freshwater Biology. (In Press.)
Ware's Beet-sugar Manufacture and Refining. Vol. I Small Svo, 4 oo
Vol.11 Small8vo, 5 co
Washington's Manual of the Chemical Analysis of Rocks 8vo, 2 oo
* Weaver's Military Explosives Svo, 3 oo
Wells's Laboratory Guide in Qualitative Chemical Analysis Svo, i 50
Short Course in Inorganic Qualitative Chemical Analysis for Engineering
Students i2mo, i 50
Text-book of Chemical Arithmetic i2mo, i 25
Whipple's Microscopy of Drinking-water Svo, 3 50
Wilson's Chlorination Process I2mo, i 53
Cyanide Processes i2mo, i 50
Winton's Microscopy of Vegetable Foods Svo, 7 50
CIVIL ENGINEERING.
BRIDGES AND ROOFS. HYDRAULICS. MATERIALS OF ENGINEER-
ING. RAILWAY ENGINEERING.
Baker's Engineers* Surveying Instruments 12010, 3 oo
Bixby's Graphical Computing Table Paper 19^X24! inches. 25
Breed and Hosmer's Principles and Practice or Surveying. 2 Volumes.
Vol. I. Elementary Surveying Svo, 3 oo
Vol. II. Higher Surveying Svo, 2 50
* Burr's Ancient and Modern Engineering and the Isthmian Canal .... Svo, 3 50
Comstock's Field Astronomy for Engineers Svo, 2 50
* Corthell's Allowable Pressures on Deep Foundations i2mo, i 25
Crandall's Text-book on Geodesy and Least Squares Svo, 3 oo
Davis's Elevation and Stadia Tables Svo, i oo
Elliott's Engineering for Land Drainage i2mo, i 50
Practical Farm Drainage lamo, i oo
*Fiebeger's Treatise on Civil Engineering Svo, 5 oo
Flemer's Phototopographic Methods and Instruments Svo, 5 oo
Folwell's Sewerage. (Designing and Maintenance.) Svo, 3 oo
Freitag's Architectural Engineering Svo, 3 50
French and Ives's Stereotomy Svo, 2 50
Goodhue's Municipal Improvements I2mo, i 50
Gore's Elements of Geodesy Svo, 2 50
* Hauch's and Rice's Tables of Quantities for Preliminary Estimates . .izmo, i 25
6
Hayford's Text-book of Geodetic Astronomy 8vo, 3 oo
Bering's Ready Reference Tables. (Conversion Factors) i6mo, mor. 2 50
Howe's Retaining Walls for Earth I2mo, i 25
* Ives's Adjustments of the Engineer's Transit and Level v . . . i6mo, Bds. 25
Ives and Hilts's Problems in Surveying i6mo, mor. i 50
Johnson's (J. B.) Theory and Practice of Surveying Small 8vo, 4 oo
Johnson's (L. J.) Statics by Algebraic and Graphic Methods 8vo, 2 oo
Kinnicutt, Winslow and Pratt's Purification of Sewage. (In Preparation.)
Laplace's Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. (Truscott and Emory)
I2mo, 2 OO
Mahan's Descriptive Geometry 8vo, i 50
Treatise on Civil Engineering. (1873.) (Wood) 8vo, 5 oo
Merriman's Elements of Precise Surveying and Geodesy 8vo, 2 50
Merriman and Brooks's Handbook for Surveyors i6mo, mor. 2 oo
Nugent's Plane Surveying 8vo, 3 50
Ogden's Sewer Construction 8vo, 3 oo
Sewer Design i2mo, 2 oo
Parsons's Disposal of Municipal Refuse 8vo, 2 oo
Patton's Treatise on Civil Engineering 8vo, half leather, 7 50
Reed's Topographical Drawing and Sketching 4to, 5 oo
Rideal's Sewage and the Bacterial Purification of Sewage 8vo, 4 oo
Riemer's Shaft-sinking under Difficult Conditions. (Corning and Peele). . .8vo, 3 oo
Siebert and Biggin's Modern Stone-cutting and Masonry 8vo, i 50
Smith's Manual of Topographical Drawing. (McMillan) 8vo, 2 50
Soper's Air and Ventilation of Subways Large i2mo, 2 50
Tracy's Plane Surveying i6mo, mor. 3 oo
'* Trautwine's Civil Engineer's Pocket-book i6mo, mor. 5 oo
Venable's Garbage Crematories in America 8vo, 2 oo
Methods and Devices for Bacterial Treatment of Sewage 8vo, 3 oo
Wait's Engineering and Architectural Jurisprudence 8vo, 6 oo
Sheep, 6 50
Law of Contracts 8vo, 3 oo
Law of Operations Preliminary to Construction in Engineering and Archi-
tecture 8vo, 5 oo
Sheep, 5 50
Warren's Stereotomy — Problems in Stone-cutting 8vo, 2 50
* Waterbury's Vest-Pocket Hand-book of Mathematics for Engineers.
ajXsl inches, mor. i oo
Wtbb's Problems in the Use and Adjustment of Engineering Instruments.
i6mo, mor. i 25
Wilson's (H. N.) Topographic Surveying 8vo, 3 50
Wilson's (W. L.) Elements of Railroad Track and Construction i2mo, 2 oo
BRIDGES AND ROOFS.
Boiler's Practical Treatise on the Construction of Iron Highway Bridges. .8vo, 2 oo
Burr and Falk's Design and Construction of Metallic Bridges 8vc. 5 oo
Influence Lines for Bridge and Roof Computations 8vo, 3 oo
Du Bois's Mechanics of Engineering. VoL II Sirall 4to, 10 oo
Foster's Treatise on Wooden Trestle Bridges 4to, 5 oo
Fowler's Ordinary Foundations 8vo, 3 50
French and Ives's Stereotomy .... 8vo, 2 50
Greene's Arches in Wood, Iron, and Stone 8vo, 2 50
Bridge Trusses 8vo, 2 50
Roof Trusses 8vo, i 25
Grimm's Secondary Stresses in Bridge Trusses 8vo, 2 *o
Heller's Stresses in Structures and the Accompanying Deformations 8vo, 3 oo
Howe's Design of Simple Roof-trusses in Wood and Steel 8vo, 2 oo
Symmetrical Masonry Arches 8vo, 2 50
Treatise on Arches. 8vo, 4 oo
Johnson, Bryan, and Turneaure's Theory and Practice in the Designing of
Modern Framed Structures Small 4to, 10 oo
Merriraan and Jacoby's Text-book on Roofs and Bridges:
Part I. Stresses in Simple Trusses 8vo, 2 50
Part II. Graphic Statics 8vo, 2 50
Part III. Bridge Design 8vo , 2 50
Part IV. Higher Structures 8vo, 2 50
Morison's Memphis Bridge Oblong 4to, 10 oo
Sondericker's Graphic Statics, with Applications to Trusses, Beams, and Arches.
8vo, 2 oo
WaddelTs De Pontibus, Pocket-book for Bridge Engineers i6mo. mor, 2 oo
* Specifications for Steel Bridges I2mo, 50
Waddell and Harrington's Bridge Engineering. (In Preparation.)
Wright's Designing of Draw-spans. Two parts in one volume 8vo, 3 50
HYDRAULICS.
Barnes's Ice Formation 8vo, 3 oo
Bazin's Experiments upon the Contraction of the Liquid Vein Issuing from
an Orifice. (Trautwine) 8vo, 2 oo
Bovey's Treatise on Hydraulics 8vo, 5 oo
Church's Diagrams of Mean Velocity of Water in Open Channels.
Oblong 4to. paper, i 50
Hydraulic Motors * 8vo, 2 oo
Mechanics of Engineering 8vo, 6 oo
Coffin's Graphical Solution of Hydraulic Problems i6mo, mor. 2 50
Flather's Dynamometers, and the Measurement of Power i2mo, 3 oo
Folwell's Water-supply Engineering 8vo, 4 oo
Frizell's Water-power 8vo, 5 oo
Fuertes's Water and Public Health I2mo, i 50
Water-filtration Works i2mo, 2 50
Ganguillet and Kutter's General Formula for the Uniform Flow of Water in
Rivers and Other Channels. (Bering and Trautwine j 8vo, 4 oo
Hazen's Clean Water and How to Get It Large ismo, i 50
Filtration of Public Water-supplies 8vo, 3 oo
Hazlehurst's Towers and Tanks for Water-works 8vo, 2 50
Herschel's 115 Experiments on the Carrying Capacity of Large, Riveted, Metal
Conduits 8vo, 2 oo
Hoyt and Grover's River Discharge.. 8vo, 2 oo
Hubbard and Kiersted's Water- works Management and Maintenance 8vo, 4 oo
* Lyndon's Development and Electrical Distribution of Water Power. . . .8vo, 3 oo
Mason's Water-supply. (Considered Principally from a Sanitary Standpoint.)
8vo, 4 oo
Merriman's Treatise on Hydraulics 8vo, 5 oo
* Michie's Elements of Analytical Mechanics 8vo. 4 oo
* Molitor's Hydraulics of Rivers. Weirs and Sluices 8vo, 2 oo
Richards's Laboratory Notes on Industrial Water Analysis. (In Press).
Schuyler's Reservoirs for Irrigation, Water-power, and Domestic Water-
supply. ... Large 8vo, 5 oo
* Thoma- and Watt's Improvement of Rivers 4to, 6 oo
Turneaure and Russell's Public Water-supplies 8vo. 5 oo
Wegmann's Design and Construction of Dams. 5th Ed., enlarged 4to, 6 oo
Water-supply of the City of New York from 1658 to 1895 4to, 10 oo
Whipple's Value of Pure Water Large I2mo, i oo
Williams and Hazen's Hydraulic Tables 8vo. i 50
Wilson's Irrigation Engineering Small 8vo, 4 oo
Wolff's Windmill as a Prime Mover 8vo, 3 oo
Wood's Elements of Analytical Mechanics 8vo, 3 oo
Turbines. 8vo, 2 50
8
MATERIALS OF ENGINEERING.
Baker's Roads and Pavements 8vo, 5 oo
Treatise on Masonry Construction 8vo, 5 oo
Birkmire's Architectural Iron and SteeL 8vo, 3 50
Compound Riveted Girders as Applied in Buildings 8vo, 2 oo
Black's United States Public Works Oblong 4to. 5 oo
Bleininger's Manufacture of Hydraulic Cement. (In Preparation.)
* Bovey's Strength of Materials and Theory of Structures 8vo, 7 50
Burr's Elasticity and Resistance of the Materials of Engineering 8vo, 7 50
Byrne's Highway Construction 8vo, 5 oo
Inspection of the Materials and Workmanship Employed in Construction.
i6mo, 3 oo
Church's Mechanics of Engineering 8vo. 6 oo
Du Bois's Mechanics of Engineering.
Vol. I. Kinematics, Statics, Kinetics Small 4to, 7 50
Vol. II. The Stresses in Framed Structures, Strength of Materials and
Theory of Flexures. Small 4to, 10 oo
*Eckel's Cements, Limes, and Plasters 8vo, 6 oo
Stone and Clay Products used in Engineering. (In Preparation.)
Fowler's Ordinary Foundations 8vo, 3 50
Graves's Forest Mensuration 8vo, 4 oo
Green's Principles of American Forestry i2mo, i 50
* Greene's Structural Mechanics 8vo, 2 50
Holly and Ladd's Analysis of Mixed Paints, Color Pigments and Varnishes
Large 12010, 2 50
Johnson's (C. M.) Chemical Analysis of Special Steels. (In Preparation.)
Johnson's (J. B.) Materials of Construction Large 8vo, 6 oo
Keep's Cast Iron 8vo, 2 50
Kidder's Architects and Builders' Pocket-book i6mo, 5 oo
Lanza's Applied Mechanics 8vo, 7 50
Maire's Modern Pigments and their Vehicles . i2mo, 2 oo
Martens's Handbook on Testing Materials. (Henning) 2 vols 8vo, 7 50
Meurer's Technical Mechanics 8vo, 4 oo
Merrill's Stones for Building and Decoration 8vo, 5 oo
Merriman's Mechanics of Materials 8vo, 5 oo
* Strength of Materials izmo, i oo
Metcalf's Steel. A Manual for Steel-users. I2mo, 2 oo
Morrison's Highway Engineering 8vo, 2 50
Patton's Practical Treatise on Foundations 8vo, 5 oo
Rice's Concrete Block Manufacture 8vo, 2 oo
Richardson's Modern Asphalt Pavements 8vo, 3 oo
Richey's Handbook for Superintendents of Construction i6mo, mor. 4 oo
* Ries's Clays: Their Occurrence, Properties, and Uses 8vo, 5 oo
Sabin's Industrial and Artistic Technology of Paints ard Varnish 8vo, 3 oo
*Schwarz'sLon^leafP5nein Virgin Forest "mo, 125
Snow's Principal Species of Wood 8vo, 3 50
Spalding's Hydraulic Cement "mo, 2 oo
Text-book on Roads and Pavements I2mo, 2 oo
Taylor and Thompson's Treatise on Concrete, Plain and Reinforced 8vo, 5 oo
Thurston's Materials of Engineering. In Three Parts 8vo, 8 oo
Part I. Non-metallic Materials of Engineering and Metallurgy 8vo, 2 oo
Partn. Iron and Steel 8v<>. 3 5O
Part III. A Treatise on Brasses, Bronzes, and Other Alloys and their
Constituents 8vo« 2 SO
Tillson's Street Pavements and Paving Materials 8vo, 4 oo
Turneaure and Maurer's Principles of Reinforced Concrete Construction.. .8vo, 3 oo
Waterbury's Cement Laboratory Manual 12010, i oo
0
RAILWAY ENGINEERING.
Andrews's Handbook for Street Railway Engineers 3x5 inches, mor. i 25
Berg's Buildings and Structures of American Railroads 4to, 5 oo
Brooks's Handbook of Street Railroad Location i6mo, mor.
Butt's Civil Engineer's Field-book i6mo, mor.
Crandall's Railway and Other Earthwork Tables . 8vo,
Transition Curve i6mo, mor.
* Crockett's Methods for Earthwork Computations 8vo,
Dawson's "Engineering" and Electric Traction Pocket-book i6mo. mor. 5 oo
Dredge's History of the Pennsylvania Railroad: (1879) Paper, 5 oo
Fisher's Table of Cubic Yards Cardboard, 25
Godwin's Railroad Engineers' Field-book and Explorers' Guide. . . i6mo, mor. 2 50
Hudson's Tables for Calculating the Cubic Contents of Excavations and Em-
bankment* 8vo, I oo
Ives and Hilts'c Problems in Surveying, Railroad Surveying and Geodesy
i6mo, mor. i 50
Molitor and Beard's Manual for Resident Engineers i6mo, i oo
Nagle's Field Manual for Railroad Engineers i6mo, mor. 3 oo
Philbrick's Field Manual for Engineers i6mo, mor. 3 oo
Raymond's Railroad Engineering. 3 volumes.
Vol. I. Railroad Field Geometry. (In Preparation.)
Vol. II. Elements of Railroad Engineering 8vo, 3 50
Vol. III. Railroad Engineer's Field Book. (In Preparation.)
Searles's Field Engineering i6mo, mor. 3 oo
Railroad Spiral i6mo, mor. i 50
Taylor's Prismoidal Formulae and Earthwork 8vo, i 50
*Trautwine's Fie'd Practice of Laying Out Circular Curves for Railroads.
1 2 mo. mor, 2 50
* Method of Calculating the Cubic Contents of Excavations and Embank-
ments by the Aid of Diagrams 8vo, 2 oo
Webb's Economics of Railroad Construction Large i2mo, 2 50
Railroad Construction r6mo, mor. 5 oo
Wellington's Economic Theory of the Location of Railways Small 8vo, 5 oo
DRAWING.
Barr's Kinematics of Machinery 8vo, 2 50
* Bartlett's Mechanical Drawing 8vo, 3 oo
* " " " Abridged Ed 8vo, 150
Coolidge's Manual of Drawing 8vo, paper, i oo
Coolidge and Freeman's Elements of General Drafting for Mechanical Engi-
neers Oblong 4:0, 2 50
Durley's Kinematics of Machines 8vo, 4 oo
Emch's Introduction to Projective Geometry and its Applications 8vo, 2 50
Hill's Text-book on Shades and Shadows, and Perspective 8vo, 2 oo
Jamison's Advanced Mechanical Drawing 8vo, 2 oo
Elements of Mechanical Drawing 8vo, 2 50
Jones's Machine Design:
Part I. Kinematics of Machinery 8vo, i 50
Part n. Form, Strength, and Proportions of Parts 8vo, 3 oo
MacCord's Elements of Descriptive Geometry 8vo, 3 o«
Kinematics; or, Practical Mechanism 8vo, 5 oo
Mechanical Drawing 4to, 4 oo
Velocity Diagrams 8vo, i 50
McLeod's Descriptive Geometry Large i2mo, i 50
* Mahan's Descriptive Geometry and Stone-cutting 8vo, i 50
Industrial Drawing. (Thompson.) 8vo, 3 50
10
McLeod's Descriptive Geometry Large i2mo, i 50
* Mahan's Descriptive Geometry and Stone-cutting 8vo, i so
Industrial Drawing. (Thompson ) "... ...... 8vo, 3 50
Moyer's Descriptive Geometry for Students of Engineering 8vo, 2 oo
Reed's Topographical Drawing and Sketching 4to, 5 oo
Reid's Course in Mechanical Drawing 8vo, 2 oo
Text-book of Mechanical Drawing and Elementary Machine Design. 8vo, 3 oo
Robinson's Principles of Mechanism 8vo, 3 oo
Schwamb and Merrill's Elements of Mechanism 8vo. 3 oo
Smith's (R. S.) Manual of Topographical Drawing. (McMillan) 8vo, 2 50
Smith (A. W.) and Marx's Machine Design 8vo, 3 oo
* Titsworth's Elements of Mechanical Drawing Oblong 8vo, i 25
Warren's Drafting Instruments and Operations i2mo, i 25
Elements of Descriptive Geometry, Shadows, and Perspective 8vo, 3 50
Elements of Machine Construction and Drawing 8vo, 7 50
Elements of Plane and Solid Free-hand Geometrical Drawing i2mo, i oo
General Problems of Shades and Shadows 8vo, 3 oo
Manual of Elementary Problems in the Linear Perspective of Form and
Shadow i2mo, i oo
Manual of Elementary Projection Drawing I2mo. i 50
Plane Problems in Elementary Geometry I2mo, i 25
Problems, Theorems, and Examples in Descriptive Geometry 8vo, 2 50
Weisbach's Kinematics and Power of Transmission. (Hermann and
Klein) 8vo, 5 oo
Wilson's (H. M.) Topographic Surveying 8vo, 3 50
Wilson's (V. T.) Free-hand Lettering 8vo, i oo
Free-hand Perspective 8vo, 2 50
Woolf 's Elementary Course in Descriptive Geometry*. Large 8vo. 3 oo
ELECTRICITY AND PHYSICS.
* Abegg's Theory of Electrolytic Dissociation, (von Ende). . . i2mo. i 25
Andrews's Hand-Book for Street Railway Engineering 3X5 inches, mor. i 25
Anthony and Brackett's Text-book of Physics. (Magie) Large i2mo, 3 oo
Anthony's Theory of Electrical Measurements. (Ball) i2mo, i oo
Benjamin's History of Electricity 8vo, 3 oo
Voltaic Cell. . 8vo, 3 oo
Betts's Lead Refining and Electrolysis 8vo, 4 oo
Classen's Quantitative Chemical Analysis by Electrolysis. (Boltwood). .8vo, 3 oo
* Collins's Manual of Wireless Telegraphy I2mo, i 50
Mor. 2 oo
Crehore and Squier's Polarizing Photo-chronograph 8vo, 3 oo
* Danneel's Electrochemistry. (Merriam) i2mo, i 25
Dawson's "Engineering" and Electric Traction Pocket-book . . . .i6mo, mor. 5 oo
Dolezalek's Theory of the Lead Accumulator (Storage Battery), (von Ende)
I2mo, 2 50
Duhem's Thermodynamics and Chemistry. (Burgess) 8vo, 4 oo
Flather's Dynamometers, and the Measurement of Power i2mo, 3 oo
Gilbert's De Magnete. (Mottelay) 8vo, 2 50
* Hanchett's Alternating Currents i2mo, i oo
Bering's Ready Reference Tables (Conversion Factors) i6mo, mor. 2 50
* Hobart and Ellis's High-speed Dynamo Electric Machinery 8vo, 6 oo
Holman's Precision of Measurements 8vo, 2 oo
Telescopic Mirror-scale Method, Adjustments, and Tests .... Large 8vc , 75
* Karapetoff's Experimental Electrical Engineering 8vo, 6 oo
Kinzbrunner's Testing of Continuous-current Machines. 8vo, 2 oo
Landauer's Spectrum Analysis. (Tingle) 8vo, 3 oo
Le Chatelier's High-temperature Measurements. (Boudouard— Burgess).. i2mo, 3 oo
Lob's Electrochemistry of Organic Compounds. (Lorenz) . . 8vo, j oo
* London's Development and Electrical Distribution of Water Power 8vo, 3 oo
11
* Lyons's Treatise on Electromagnetic Phenomena. Vols. I. and II. 8vo, each 6 oo
* Michie's Elements of V/ave Motion Relating to Sound and Light 8vo, 4 oo
Morgan's Outline of the Theory of Solution and its Results i2mo, i oo
* Physical Chemistry for Electrical Engineers i2mo, i 50
Niaudet's Elementary Treatise on Electric Batteries. (Fishback) izmo, 2 50
* Norris's Introduction to the Study of Electrical Engineering 8vo, 2 50
* Parshall and Hobart's Electric Machine Design 4to, half mor. 12 50
Reagan's Locomotives: Simple, Compound, and Electric. New Edition.
Large 12 mo, 3 50
* Rosenberg's Electrical Engineering. (HaldaneGee — Kinzbrunner) . . .8vo, 2 oo
Ryan, Norris, and Hozie's Electrical Machinery. Vol. I 8vo, 2 50
Schapper's Laboratory Guide for Students in Physical Chemistry I2mo, i oo
* Tillman's Elementary Lessons in Heat 8vo, i 50
Tory and Pitcher's Manual of Laboratory Physics Large i2mo, 2 oo
Ulke's Modern Electrolytic Copper Refining 8vo, 3 oo
LAW.
Brennan's Handbook: A Compendium of Useful Legal Information for
Business Men i6mo, mor. 5 oo
* Davis's Elements of Law 8vo, 2 50
* Treatise on the Military Law of United States 8vo, 7 oo
Sheep, 7 50
* Dudley's Military Law and the Procedure of Courts-martial . . .Large i2mo, 2 50
Manual for Courts-martial i6mo, mor. i 50
Wait's Engineering and Architectural Jurisprudence 8vo, 6 oo
Sheep, 6 50
Law of Contracts 8vo, 3 oo
Law of Operations Preliminary to Construction in Engineering and Archi-
tecture 8 vo, 5 oo
Sheep, 5 50
MATHEMATICS.
Baker's Elliptic Functions 8vo, 50
Briggs's Elements of Plane Analytic Geometry. (Bocher) i2mo, oo
* Buchanan's Plane and Spherical Trigonometry 8vo, oo
Byerley's Harmonic Functions 8vo, oo
Chandler's Elements of the Infinitesimal Calculus 12 mo, oo
Coffin's Vector Analysis. (In Press.)
Compton's Manual of Logarithmic Computations i2mo, 50
* Dickson's College Algebra Large i2mo, 50
* Introduction to the Theory of Algebraic Equations Large 12 mo, 25
Emch's Introduction to Projective Geometry and its Applications 8vo, 50
Fiske's Functions of a Complex Variable 8vo, co
Halsted's Elementary Synthetic Geometry 8vo, 50
Elements of Geometry 8vo, 75
* Rational Geometry i2mo, 50
Hyde's Grassmann's Space Analysis 8vo, oo
* Johnson's (J. B.) Three-place Logarithmic Tables: Vest-pocket size, paper, 15
100 copies, 5 oo
Mounted on heavy cardboard, 8 X 10 inches, 25
10 copies, a oo
Johnson's (W. W.) Abridged Editions of Differential and Integral Calculus
Large 12010, i vol. 2 50
Curve Tracing in Cartesian Co-ordinates 12 mo, i oo
Differential Equations 8vo, i oo
Elementary Treatise on Differential Calculus Large 12100, i 50
Elementary Treatise on the Integral Calculus Large 12 mo, i 50
Theoretical Mechanics i2mo, 3 oo
Theory of Errors and the Method of Least Squares 12 mo, i 50
Treatise on Differential Calculus Large 12 mo, 3 oo
12
Johnson's Treatise on the Integral Calculus Large i2mo, 3 oo
Treatise on Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations. Large i2mo, 3 50
Karapetoff's Engineering Applications of Higher Mathematics. (In Pre-
paration.)
Laplace's Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. (Truscott and Emory). .i2mo, 2 oo
* Ludlow and Bass's Elements of Trigonometry and Logarithmic and Other
Tables 8vo, j oo
Trigonometry and Tables published separately Each, 2 oo
* Ludlow's Logarithmic and Trigonometric Tables 8vo, i oo
Macfarlane's Vector Analysis and Quaternions 8vo, i oo
McManon's Hyperbolic Functions 8vo, i oo
Manning's Irrational Numbers and their Representation by Sequences and
Series i2mo, i 25
Mathematical Monographs. Edited by Mansfield Merriman and Robert
S. Woodward Octavo, each i oo
No. i. History of Modern Mathematics, by David Eugene Smith.
No. 2. Synthetic Projective Geometry, by George Bruce Halsted.
No. 3. Determinants, by Laenas Gifford Weld. No. 4. Hyper-
bolic Functions, by James McMahon. No. S- Harmonic Func-
tions, by William E. Byerly. No. 6. Grassmann's Space Analysis,
by Edward W. Hyde. No. 7. Probability and Theory of Errors,
ty Robert S. Woodward. No. 8. Vector Analysis and Quaternions,
by Alexander Macfarlane. No. 9. Differential Equations, by
William Woolsey Johnson. No. 10. The Solution of Equations,
by Mansfield Merriman. No. u. Functions of a Complex Variable,
by Thomas S. Fiske.
Maurer's Technical Mechanics 8vo, 4 oo
Merriman's Mefhofl of Least Squares 8vo, 2 oo
Solution of Equations 8vo, I oo
Rice and Johnson's Differential and Integral Calculus. 2 vols. in one.
I^arge i2mo, i 50
Elementary Treatise on the Differential Calculus Large I2mo, 3 oo
Smith's History of Modern Mathematics 8vo, i oo
* Veblen and Lennes's Introduction to the Real Infinitesimal Analysis of One
Variable 8vo, 2 oo
* Waterbury's Vest Pocket Hand-Book of Mathematics for Engine' rs.
aJXsl inches, mor. i oo
Weld's Determinations 8vo, i co
Wood's Elements of Co-ordinate Geometry 8vo, 2 oo
Woodward's Probability aid Theory of Errors 8vo, I oo
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING.
MATERIALS OF ENGINEERING, STEAM-ENGINES AND BOILERS.
Bacon's forge Practice I2mo, i 50
Baldwin's Steam Heating for Buildings I2mo, 2 50
Bair's Kinematics of Machinery 8vo, 2 50
* Bartlett's Mechanical Drawing 8vo, 3 oo
* " " " Abridged Ed 8vo, 150
Benjamin's Wrinkles and Recipes i2mo, 2 oo
* Burr's Ar cient and Modern Engineering and the Isthmian Canal 8vo, 3 50
Carpenter's Experimental Engineering 8vo, 6 oo
Heating and Ventilating Buildings 8vo, 4 oo
Clerk's Gas and Oil Engine Large i2mo, 4 oo
Compton's First Lessons in Metal Working I2mo, i 50
Compton and De Groodt's Speed Lathe i2mo, i 50
Coolidge's Manual of Drawing 8vo, paper, i oo
Coolidge and Freeman's Elements of General Drafting for Mechanical En-
gineers Oblong 410, 2 50
13
50
00
00
00
25
00
Cromwell's Treatise on Belts and Pulleys izmo, i 50
Treatise on Toothed Gearing I2mo,
Durley's Kinematics of Machines 8vo,
Flather's Dynamometers and the Measurement of Power izmo,
Rope Driving I2mo,
Gill's Gas and Fuel Analysis for Engineers I2mo,
Goss s Locomotive Sparks 8vo,
Greene's Pumping Machinery. (In Preparation.)
Bering's Ready Reference Tables (Conversion Factors) i6mo, mor. 2 50
* Hobart and Ellis's High Speed Dynamo Electric Machinery 8vo, 6 oo
Button's Gas Engine 8vof 5 oo
Jamison's Advanced Mechanical Drawing 8vo, 2 oo
Elements of Mechanical Drawing 8vo, 2 50
Jones's Gas Engine. (In Press.)
Machine Design:
Part I. Kinematics of Machinery 8vo, i 50
Part II. Form, Strength, and Proportions of Parts 8vo, 3 oo
Kent's Mechanical Engineers' Pocket-book i6mo, mor. 5 oo
Kerr's Power and Power Transmission 8vo, 2 oo
Leonard's Machine Shop Tools and Methods 8vo, 4 oo
* Lorenz's Modern Refrigerating Machinery. (Pope, Haven, and Dean) . . . 8vo, 4 oo
MacCord's Kinematics; or, Practical Mechanism 8vo, 5 oo
Mechanical Drawing 4to, 4 oo
Velocity Diagrams 8vo, i 50
MacFarland's Standard Reduction Factors for Gases 8vo, i 50
Mahan's Industrial Drawing. (Thompson) 8vo, 3 50
Oberg's Screw Thread Systems, Taps, Dies, Cutters, and Reamers. (In
Press.)
* Parshall and Hobart's Electric Machine Design Small 4to, half leather, 12 50
Peele's Compressed Air Plant for Mines 8vo, 3 oo
Poole's Calorific Power of Fuels 8vo, 3 oo
* Porter's Engineering Reminiscences, 1855 to 1882 8vo, 3 oo
Reid's Course in Mechanical Drawing 8vo, 2 oo
Text-book of Mechanical Drawing and Elementary Machine Design. 8vo, 3 oo
Richard's Compressed Air i2mo, i 50
Robinson's Principles of Mechanism 8vo, 3 oo
Schwamb and Merrill's Elements of Mechanism 8vo, 3 oo
Smith's (O.) Press-working of Metals 8vo, 3 oo
Smith (A. W.) and Marx's Machine Design . .8vo, 3 oo
Sorel ' s Carbureting and Combustion in Alcohol Engines . (Woodward and Preston) .
Large 12 mo, 3 oo
Thurston's Animal as a Machine and Prime Motor, and the Laws of Energetics.
12010, z oo
Treatise on Friction and Lost Work in Machinery and Mill Work... 8vo, 3 oo
Tillson's Complete Automobile Instructor i6mo, i 50
mor. a oo
Titsworth's Elements of Mechanical Drawing Oblong 8vo, i 25
Warren's Elements of Machine Construction and Drawing 8vo, 7 50
* Waterbury's Vest Pocket Band Book of Mathematics for Engineers.
2}X5« inches, mor. i oo
Weisbach's Kinematics and the Power of Transmission. (Berrmann —
Klein) 8vo, 500
Machinery of Transmission and Governors. (Berrmann— Klein).. .8vo, 5 oo
Wood's Turbines 8vo, 2 50
MATERIALS OF ENGINEERING
* Bovey's Strength of Materials and Theory of Structures 8vo, 7 50
Burr's Elasticity and Resistance of the Materials of Engineering 8vo, 7 50
Church's Mechanics of Engineering 8vo, 6 oo
* Greene's Structural Mechanics 8vo, 2 50
14
Holley and Ladd's Analysis of Mixed Paints, Color Pigments, and Varnishes.
Large i2mo, 2 50
Johnson's Materials of Construction 8vo, 6 oo
Keep's Cast Iron. 8vo, 2 50
Lanza's Applied Mechanics 8vo, 7 50
Maire's Modern Pigments and their Vehicles I2mo, 2 oo
Martens's Handbook on Testing Materials. (Henning) 8vo, 7 50
Maurer's Technical Mechanics 8vo, 4 oo
Merriman's Mechanics of Materials 8vo, 5 oo
* Strength of Materials I2mo, i oo
Metcalf's Steel. A Manual for Steel-users i2mo, 2 oo
Sabin's Industrial and Artistic Technology of Paints and Varnish. 8vo, 3 oo
Smith's Materials of Machines I2mo, I oo
Thurston's Materials of Engineering 3 vols., 8vo, 8 oo
Part I. Non-metallic Materials of Engineering and Metallurgy. . .8vo, 2 oo
Part II. Iron and Steel 8vo, 3 50
Part HI. A Treatise on Brasses, Bronzes, and Other Alloys and their
Constituents 8vo, 2 50
Wood's (De V.) Elements of Analytical Mechanics 8vo, 3 oo
Treatise on the Resistance of Materials and an Appendix on the
Preservation of Timber 8vo, a oo
Wood's (M. P.) Rustless Coatings: Corrosion and Electrolysis of Iron and
Steel 8vo, 4 oo
STEAM-ENGINES AND BOILERS.
Berry's Temperature-entropy Diagram 1 2mo, i 25
Carnot's Reflections on the Motive Power of Heat. (Thurston) I2mo, i 50
Chase's Art of Pattern Making i2mo, 2 50
Creighton's Steam-engine and other Heat-motors 8vo, 500
Dawson's "Engineering" and Electric Traction Pocket-book i6mo, mor. 5 oo
Ford's Boiler Making for Boiler Makers i8mo, i oo
*Gebhardt's Steam Power Plant Engineering 8vo, 6 oo
Goss's Locomotive Performance 8vo, 5 oo
Heraenway's Indicator Practice and Steam-engine Economy i2mo, 2 oo
Button's Heat and Heat-engines 8vo. 5 oo
Mechanical Engineering of Power Plants 8vo, 5 oo
Kent's Steam boiler Economy 8vo, 4 oo
Kneass's Practice and Theory of the Injector 8vo, i 50
MacCord's Slide-valves 8vo, 2 oo
Meyer's Modern Locomotive Construction 4to, 10 oo
Meyer's Steam Turbines. (In Press.)
Peabody's Manual of the Steam-engine Indicator i2mo. i 50
Tables of the Properties of Saturated Steam and Other Vapors 8vo, i oo
Thermodynamics of the Steam-engine and Other Heat-engines 8vo, 5 oo
Valve-gears for Steam-engines 8vo, 2 50
Peabody and Miller's Steam-boilers 8vo, 4 oo
Pray's Twenty Years with the Indicator Large 8vo, 2 50
Pupin's Thermodynamics of Reversible Cycles in Gases and Saturated Vapors.
(Osterberg). i2mo, i 25
Reagan's Locomotives. Simple, Compound, and Electric. New Edition.
Large i2mo, 3 50
Sinclair's Locomotive Engine Running and Management i2mo, 2 oo
Smart's Handbook of Engineering Laboratory Practice i2mo, 2 50
Snow's Steam-boiler Practice 8vo, 3 oo
Spangler's Notes on Thermodynamics i2mo, i oo
Valve-gears 8vo, 2 50
Spangler, Greene, and Marshall's Elements of Steam-engineering 8vo, 3 oo
Thomas's Steam-turbines 8vo, 4 oo
15
Thurston's Handbook of Engine and Boiler Trials, and the Use of the Indi-
cator and the Prony Brake 8vo, 5 oo
Handy Tables 8vo, i 50
Manual of Steam-boilers, their resigns, Construction, and Operation..8vo, 5 oo
Thurston's Manual of the Steam-engine 2 vols., 8vo, 10 oo
Part I. History, Structure, and Theory SVD, 6 oo
Part II. Design, Construction, and Operation 8vo, 6 oo
Steam-boiler Explosions in Theory and in Practice 12 mo, i 50
Wehrenfenning's Analysis and Softening of Boiler Feed-water (Patterson) 8vo, 4 oo
Weisbach's Heat, Steam, and Steam-engines. (Du Bois) 8vo, 5 oo
T/hitham's Steam-engine Design 8vo, 5 oo
Wood's Thermodynamics, Heat Motors, and Refrigerating Machines. . .8vo, 4 oo
MECHANICS PURE AND APPLIED.
Church's Mechanics of Engineering 8vo, 6 oo
Notes and Examples in Mechanics 8vo, 2 oo
Dana's Text-book of Elementary Mechanics for Colleges and Schools. .i2mo, i 50
Du Bois's Elementary Principles of Mechanics:
VoL I. Kinematics 8vo, 3 50
VoL II. Statics 8vo, 4 oo
Mechanics of Engineering. Vol. I Small 4to, 7 50
VoL II. Small 4to, 10 oo
* Greene's Structural Mechanics 8vo, 2 50
James's Kinematics of a Point and the Rational Mechanics of a Particle.
Large 12 mo, 2 oo
* Johnson's (W. W.) Theoretical Mechanics I2mo. 3 oo
Lanza's Applied Mechanics 8vo, 7 50
* Martin's Text Book on Mechanics, VoL I, Statics i2mo, i 25
* Vol. 2, Kinematics and Kinetics . . lamo, 1 50
Maurer's Technical Mechanics 8vo, 4 oo
* Merriman's Elements of Mechanics I2mo, I oo
Mechanics of Materials 8vo, 5 oo
* Michie's Elements of Analytical Mechanics 8vo, 4 oo
Robinson's Principles of Mechanism 8vo, 3 oo
Sanborn's Mechanics Problems Large i2mo, i 50
Schwamb and Merrill's Elements of Mechanism 8vo, 3 oo
Wood's Elements of Analytical Mechanics Cvo, 3 oo
Principles of Elementary Mechanics i2mo, i 25
MEDICAL.
* Abderhalden's Physiological Chemistry in Thirty Lectures. (Hall and Defren)
8vo. 5 oo
von Behring's Suppression of Tuberculosis. (Bolduan) i2mo, i oo
* Bolduan's Immune Sera i2mo, i 50
Borders Contribution to Immunity. (Gay). (In Preparation.)
Davenport's Statistical Methods with Special Reference to Biological Varia-
tions * 6mo, mor. i 50
Ehrlich's Collected Studies on Immunity. (Bolduan) 8vo, 6 oo
* Fischer's Physiology of Alimentation Large i2mo, cloth, 2 oo
de Fursac's Manual of Psychiatry. (Rosanoff and Collins) Large i2mo, 2 50
Hammarsten's Text-book on Physiological Chemistry. (Mandel) 8vo, 4 oo
Jackson's Directions for Laboratory Work in Physiological Chemistry. ..8vo, i 25
Lassar-Cohn's Practical Urinary Analys's. fLorenz) lamo, i oo
Mandel's Hand Book for the Bi -Chemical Laboratory. .. . . 12 mo, i 50
* Pauli's Physical Chemistry in the Service of Medicine. (Fischer) I2mo, i 25
* Pozzi-Escot's Toxins and Venoms and their Antibodies. (Cohn) I2mo. i oo
Rostoski's Serum Diagnosis. (Bolduan \ . izmo, i oo
Ruddiman's Incompatibilities in Prescriptions 8vo. 2 oo
Whys in Pharmacy 12mo- x °°
16
Salkowski's Physiological and Pathological Chemistry. (Orndorff) 8vo, 2 50
* Satterlee's Outlines of Human Embryology .' i2mo i 25
Smith's Lecture Notes on Chemistry for Dental Students 8vo, 2 50
Steel's Treatise on the Diseases of the Dog 8vo, 3 50
* Whipple's Typhoid Fever Large i2mo, 3 oo
Woodhull's Notes on Military Hygiene i6mo, I 50
* Personal Hygiene . . i2mo, I oo
Worcester and Atkinson's Small Hospitals Establishment and Maintenance,
and S ggestions for Hospital Architecture, with Plans for a Small
Hospital i2mo, i 25
METALLURGY.
Betts's Lead Refining by Electrolysis 8vo, 4 oo
Holland's Encyclopedia of Founding and Dictionary of Foundry Terms Used
in the Practice of Moulding 12 mo, 3 oo
Iron Founder 1 2mo, 2 50
" " Supplement 1 2mo, 2 50
Douglas's Untechnical Addresses on Technical Subjects i2mo, i oo
Goesel's Minerals and Metals: A Reference Book i6mo, mor. 3 oc
* Iles's Lead-smelting i2mo, 2 50
Keep's Cast Iron 8vo, 2 50
LeChatelier's High-temperature Measurements. (Boudouard — Burgess) i2mo, 3 oo
Metcalfs Steel. A Manual for Steel-users i2mo, 2 oo
Miller's Cyanide Process i2mo, i oo
Minet's Production of Aluminium and its Industrial Use. (Waldo) . . . i2mo, 2 50
Robine and Lenglen's Cyanide Industry. (Le Clerc) 8vo, 4 oo
Ruer's Elements of Metallography. (Mathewson (In Press.)
Smith's Materials of Machines i2mo, i oo
Tate and Stone's Foundry Practice. (In Press. >
Thurston's Materials of Engineering. In Three Parts . 8vo, 8 oo
Part I. Non-metallic Materials of Engineering and Metallurgy . . . 8vo, 2 oo
Part n. Iron and Steel 8vo, 3 50
Part HI. A Treatise on Brasses, Bronzes, and Other Alloys and their
Constituents 8vo, 2 50
Ulke's Modern Electrolytic Copper Refining 8vo, 3 oo
West's American Foundry Practice i2mo, 2 50
Moulder's Text Book 12010, 2 50
Wilson's Chlorination Process i2mo, i 50
Cyanide Processes I2mo, i 50
MINERALOGY.
Barfinger's Description of Minerals of Commercial Va'ue Oblong, mor. 2 50
Boyd's Resources of Southwest Virginia 8vo, 3 oo
Boyd's Map of Southwest Virginia. Pocket-book form. 2 oo
* Browning's Introduction to the Rarer Elements 8vo, i 50
Brush's Manual of Determinative Mineralogy. (Penfield) 8vo, 4 oo
Butler's Pocket Hand-Book of Minerals i6mo, mor. 3 oo
Chester's Catalogue of Minerals 8vo, paper, i oo
Cloth, i 25
* Crane's Gold and Silver 8vo, 5 oo
Dana's First Appendix to Dana's New " System of Mineralogy. ." . Large 8vo, i oo
Manual of Mineralogy and Petrography i2mo 2 oo
Minerals and How to Study Them . I2mo, I 50
System of Mineralogy Large 8vo, half leather, 12 50
Text-book of Mineralogy 8vo, 4 oo
Douglas's Untechnical Address.es on Technical Subjects i2mo, i oo
Eakle's Mineral Tables . . -8vo, i 25
Stone and Clay Products Used in Engineering. ( In Preparation. )
17
Egleston's Catalogue of Minerals and Synonyms 8vo, 2 50
Goesel's Minerals and Metals : A Reference Book i6mo mor. 3 oo
Groth's Introduction to Chemical Crystallography (Marshall) 12 mo, i 25
* Iddings's Rock Minerals 8vo, 5 oo
Johannsen's Determination of Rock-forming Minerals in Thin Sections 8vo, 4 oo
* Martin's Laboratory Guide to Qualitative Analysis with the Blowpipe, istno, 60
Merrill's Non-metallic Minerals: Their Occurrence and Uses 8vo, 4 oo
Stones for Building and Decoration . . 8vo, 5 oo
* Penfield's Notes on Determinative Mineralogy and Record of Mineral Tests.
8vo, paper, 50
Tables of Minerals, Including the Use of Minerals and Statistics of
Domestic Production 8vo, i oo
* Pirsson's Rocks and Rock Minerals izmo, 2 50
* Richards's Synopsis of Mineral Characters I2mo, mor. i 25
* Ries's Clays: Their Occurrence, Properties, and Uses 8vo, 5 oo
* TiUman's Text-book of Important Minerals and Rocks 8vo, 2 oo
MINING.
* Beard's Mine Gases and Explosions Large i2mo, 3 oo
Boyd's Map of Southwest Virginia Pocket-book rorm, 2 oo
Resources of Southwest Virginia 8vo, 3 oo
* Crane's Gold and Silver 8vo, 5 oo
Douglas's Untechnical Addresses on Technical Subjects I2mo i oo
Eissler's Modern High Explosives 8vo, 4 oo
Goesel's Minerals and Metals : A Reference Book 1 6mo, mor. 3 oo
Ir.lseng's Manual of Mining 8vo, 5 oo
* Iles's Lead-smelting I2mo, 2 50
Miller's Cyanide Process i2mo, i oo
O'Driscoll's Notes on the Treatment of Gold Ores Svo, 2 oo
Peele's Compressed Air Plant for Mines 8vo, 3 oo
Riemer's Shaft Sinking Under Difficult Conditions. (Corning and Peele) ... Svo, 3 oo
Robine and Lenglen's Cyanide Industry. (Le Clerc) Svo, 4 oo
* Weaver's Military Explosives Svo, 3 oo
Wilson's Chlorination Process nmo, i 50
Cyanide Processes i2mo, i 50
Hydraulic and Placer Mining. 2d edition, rewritten 12010, 2 50
Treatise on Practical and Theoretical Mine Ventilation 12 mo, i 25
SANITARY SCIENCE.
Association of State and National Food and Dairy Departments, Hartford Meeting,
1906 Svo, 3 oo
Jamestown Meeting, 1907 Svo, 3 oo
* Bashore's Outlines of Practical Sanitation I2mo, I 25
Sanitation of a Country House I2mo, i co
Sanitation of Recreation Camps and Parks i2mo, i oo
Folwell's Sewerage. (Designing, Construction, and Maintenance) Svo, 3 oo
Water-supply Engineering Svo, 4 oo
Fowler's Sewage Works Analyses i2mo, 2 oo
Fuertes's Water-filtration Works I2mo, 2 50
Water and Public Health i2mo, i 50
Gerhard's Guide to Sanitary House-inspection i6mo, i oo
* Modern Baths and Bath Houses Svo, 3 oo
Sanitation of Public Buildings tamo, i 50
Hazen's Clean Water and How to Get It Large i2mo, i 50
Filtration of Public Water-supplies Svo. 3 oo
Kinnlcut, Winslow and Pratt's Purification of Sewage. (In Press.)
Leach's Inspection and Analysis of Food with Special Reference to State
Control Svo. 7 oo
18
Mason's Examination of Water. (Chemical and Bacteriological) I2mo, 125
Water-supply. ( Considered Principally from a Sanitary Standpoint) . . 8vo, 4 oo
* Merriman's Elements of Sanitary Engineering 8vo, 2 oo
Ogden's Sewer Design I2mo, 2 oo
Parsons's Disposal of Municipal Refuse 8vo, 2 oo
Prescott and Winslow's Elements of Water Bacteriology, with Special Refer-
ence to Sanitary Water Analysis I2mo, i 50
* Price's Handbook on Sanitation I2mo, i 50
Richards's Cost of Cleanness. A Twentieth Century Problem i2mo, i oo
Cost of Food. A Study in Dietaries i2mo, i oo
Cost of Living as Modified by Sanitary Science. i2mo, i oo
Cost of Shelter. A Study in Economics i2mo, I oo
* Richards and WilHams's Dietary Computer 8vo, i 50
Richards and Woodman's Air, Water, and Food from a Sanitary Stand-
point 8vo, 2 oo
Rideal's Disinfection and the Preservation of Food. 8vo, 400
Sewage and Bacterial Purification of Sewage 8vo, 4 oo
Soper's Air and Ventilation of Subways Large i2mo, 2 50
Turneaure and Russell's Public Water-supplies 8vo, 5 oo
Venable's Garbage Crematories in America 8vo, 2 oo
Method and Devices for Bacterial Treatment of Sewage 8vo, 3 oo
Ward and Whipple's Freshwater Biology i2tno, 2 50
Whipple's Microscopy of Drinking-water 8vo, 3 50
* Typhod Fever Large i2mo, 3 oo
Value of Pure Water Large 12010, i oo
Winslow's Bacterial Classification 1 2mo, 2 50
Winton's Microscopy of Vegetable Foods. 8vo, 7 50
MISCELLANEOUS.
Emmons's Geological Guide-book of the Rocky Mountain Excursion of the
International Congress of Geologists Large 8vo, i 50
Ferrel's Popular Treatise on the Winds 8vo, 4 oo
Fitzgerald's Boston Machinist i8mo, i oo
Gannett's Statistical Abstract of the World «4mo, 75
Haines's American Railway Management i2mo, 2 50
* Hanusek's The Microscopy of Technical Products. (Winton) 8vo, 5 oo
Owen's The Dyeing and Cleaning of Textile Fabrics. (Standage). (In Press.)
Ricketts's History of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 1824-1894.
Large i2mo, 3 oo
Rotherham's Emphasized New Testament r Large 8vo, 2 oo
standage's Decoration of Wood, Glass, Metal, etc 12 mo, 2 oo
Thome's Structural and Physiological Botany. (Bennett) i6mo, 2 25
Westermaier's Compendium of General Botany. (Schneider) 8vo, 2 oo
Winslow's Elements of Applied Microscopy I2tno, i 50
HEBREW AND CHALDEE TEXT-BOOKS.
Green's Elementary Hebrew Grammar I2mo, i 25
Gesenius's Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon to the Old Testament Scriptures.
(Tregelles) Small 4*0, half mor. 5 oo
10
to
co
en
(I) O
Q) ^
<D
• S'
Q) Q)
'd to
siqj tuojj
9AOUI9J
JOU OQ
OINOHOI JO AlISaSAINn