Skip to main content

Full text of "Sex and repression in savage society"

See other formats


^, 


,=->       v" 


'^■A, 


"*)  ■'"     '*'//auAiNiii\e^ 


% 


-     '^, 


.vtJIDDAfA' 


^r 


1^  J^UI 


%  ^ 


} 


V 


Li  ir"^ 


3»  ^       S   J^'* 


International  Library  of  Psychology 
Philosophy  and  Scientific   Method 


Sex  and   Repression   in 
Savage  Society 


International  Library  of  Psychology 
Philosophy  and  Scientific   Method 

GENERAL   EDITOR:    C.    K.   OGDEN,    M.A.   {Magdalene  College,  Cambridge) 

Philosophical  Studies  .         .         .         .  .         .      by  G.  E.  Moore,  Litt.D. 

The  Misuse  of  Mind by  Karin  Stephen 

Conflict  and  Dream* 6y  W.  H.  R.  Rivers,  F.R.S. 

Tractatus  Logico-Philosophicus  .         .         .         .  .   fry  L.  Wittgenstein 

Psychological  Types* fry  C.  G.  Jung,  M.D. 

Scientific  Thought* fry  C.  D.  Broad,  Litt.D. 

The  Meaning  of  Meaning     .         .         .         .      fry  C.  K.  Ogden  and  I.  A.  Richards 
Individual  Psychology  .......        fry  Alfred  Adler 

Speculations  (Preface  by  Jacob  Epstein) fry  T.  E.  Hulme 

The  Psychology  of  Reasoning*     .....  fry  Eugenio  Rignano 

The  Philosophy  OF  "  As  If  " fry  H.  Vaihinger 

The  Nature  of  Intelligence  .         .         .         .         .  fry  L.  L.  Thurstone 

Telepathy  and  Clairvoyance fry  R.  Tischner 

The  Growth  of  the  Mind     .         .         .         .         .  .         .    fry  K.  Koffka 

The  Mentality  of  Apes         .         .         .         .         .         .  .    fry  W.  Kohler 

Psychology  of  Religious  Mysticism      .         .         .         .         .         .  fry  J.  H.  Leub." 

The  Philosophy  of  Music      .         .         .         .         .         .         .     fry  W.  Pole,  F.R.S. 

The  Psychology  of  a  Musical  Prodigy  .         .         .         .  .      fry  G.  Revesz 

Principles  of  Literary  Criticism  .  .         .         .         .        fry  I.  A.  Richards 

Metaphysical  Foundation  of  Sciences  .         .         .         .         fry  E.  A.  Burtt,  Ph.D. 

Thought  and  the  Brain*       .  .         .  '      .         .         .         .      fry  H.  Pi6ron 

Physique  and  Character*      ......         fry  Ernst  Kretschmer 

Psychology  of  Emotion <       .  fry  J.  T.  MacCurdy,  M.D. 

Problems  of  Personality       .....         in  honour  of  Morton  Prince 

The  History  of  Materialism         .         ...         .         .         .  ^  F.  A.  Lange 

Personality*        .         .  .         .         .      fry  R.  G.  Gordon,  M.D. 

Educational  Psychology       .......  fry  Charles  Fox 

Language  and  Thought  of  the  Child    ......       fry  J.  Piaget 

Sex  and  Repression  in  Savage  Society*  .         .         .    fry  B.  Malinowski,  D.Sc. 

Comparative  Philosophy       ......  fry  P.  Masson-Oursel 

SocLAL  Life  in  the  Animal  World  .         .         .         .         .         .  fry  F.  Alverdes 

How  Animals  Find  their  Way  About  .         .  .         .     fry  E.  Rabaud 

The  Social  Insects fry  W.  Morton  Wheeler 

Theoretical  Biology fry  J.  von  UexkOll 

Possibility  . .    fry  Scott  Buchanan 

The  Technique  of  Controversy fry  B.  B.  Bogoslovskv 

The  Symbolic  Process  .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .  fry  J.  F.  Markey 

Political  Pluralism fry  K.  C.  Hsiao 

History  of  Chinese  Political  Thought  .         .  .fry  Liang  Chi-Chao 

Integrative  Psychology*      .......     fry  W.  M.  Marston 

The  Analysis  of  Matter       .....       fry  Bertrand  Russell,  F.R.S. 

Plato's  Theory  of  Ethics     .         .         .         .         .         .         .  frv  R.  C.  Lodge 

Historical  Introduction  to  Modern  Psychology  .         .         .         .   fry  G.  Murphy 

Creative  Imagination   ........    fry  June  E.  Downey 

Colour  and  Colour  Theories        ....      fry  Christine  Ladd-Franklin 

Biological  Principles  .         .         .         .         .  .         .       byJ.H.  Woodger 

The  Trauma  of  Birth  .........    fry  Otto  Rank 

The  Statistical  Method  in  Economics  .         .         .         .         .       fry  P.  S.  Florence 

The  Art  of  Interrogation    .         .  .         .         .         .     fry  E.  R.  Hamilton 

The  Growth  of  Reason         .......      fry  Frank  Lorimer 

Human  Speech      ........         fry  Sir  Richard  Paget 

Foundations  of  Geometry  and  Induction      .         .         .         .         .fry  Jean  Nicod 

The  Laws  of  Feeling    .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .  fry  F.  Paulhan 

The  Mental  Development  of  the  Child         .         .         .         .         .     fry  K.  Buhler 

EiDETic  Imagery   .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         fry  E.  R.  Jaensch 

The  Concentric  Method       .         .         .         .         .         .  fry  M.  Laignel-Lavastine 

The  Foundations  of  Mathematics         .         .         .         .         .  fry  F.  P.  Ramsey 

The  Philosophy  of  the  Unconscious      .         .         .         .  fry  E.  von  H.mitmann 

Outlines  of  Greek  Philosophy fry  E.  Zeller 

The  Psychology  of  Children's  Drawings fry  Helga  Eng 

Invention  and  the  Unconscious    .  .         .         .         fry  J.  M.  Montmasson 

The  Theory  of  Legislation by  Jeremy  Bentham 

The  Social  Life  of  Monkeys fry  S.  Zuckerman 

The  Development  of  the  Sexual  Impulses      .         .         .       fry  R.  E.  Money-Kyrle 
Constitution  Types  in  Delinquency      .         .         .         .         .     fry  W.  A.  Willemse 

The  Sciences  of  Man  in  the  Making     .         .         .         .  fry  E.  A.  Kirkpatrick 

Ethical  Relativity  .         .         .         .         .         .        fry  E.  A.  Westermarck 

The  Gestalt  Theory    .......  fry  Bruno  Petermann 

The  Psychology  of  Consciousness fry  C.  Daly  King 

The  Spirit  of  Language  .         .         .         .         .  .    fry  K.  Vossler 

The  Dynamics  of  Education  .         .         .         .         .         .fry  Hilda  Taba 

The  Nature  of  Learning       ......  fry  George  Humphrey 

The  Individual  and  the  Commxjnity      .         .         .         .         -fry  Wen  Kwei  Liao 

Crime,  Law,  and  Social  Science    .         ,         .fry  Jerome  Michael  and  M.  J.  Adler 
Dynamic  Social  Research     .         .  .      fry  J.  J.  Hader  and  E.  C.  Lindeman 

Speech  Disorders fry  S.  M.  Stinchfield 

The  Nature  of  Mathematics fry  Max  Black 

The  Neural  Basis  of  Thought  fry  G.  G.  Campion  and  Sir  Grafton  Elliot  Smith 

Law  and  the  Social  Sciences         .....       fry  Huntington  Cairns 
Plato's  Theory  of  Knowledge  .         .         .         .         .    fry  F.  M.  Cornford 

Infant  Speech      .         .         .  .         .  fry  M.  M.  Lewis 

•  Asterisks  denote  that  other  books  by  the  same  author  are  included  in  the  Series. 


Sex  and  Repression 
in  Savage  Society 


By 

BRONISLAW    MALINOWSKI 


m 


LONDON 

KEGAN  PAUL,  TRENCH,  TRUBNER  &  Co.,  Ltd. 

BROADWAY  HOUSE,  68-74  CARTER  LANE,  E.C.4 


1937 


First  published  1927 
Reprinted     ...     1 937 


Made  and  Printed  in  Great  Britain  by 

PERCY    LUND,    HUMPHKIES    &    CO.    LTD. 

12  Bedford  Square,  London,  W.C.i 

and  at  Bradford 


TO 

MY   FRIEND 

PAUL  KHUNER 

New  Guinea,  1914,  Australia,  1918, 
South  Tyrol,  1922. 


PREFACE 

'T^HE  doctrine  of  psycho-analysis  has  had  within 
the  last  ten  years  a  truly  meteoric  rise  in  popular 
favour.  It  has  exercised  a  growing  influence  over 
contemporary  literature,  science,  and  art.  It  has  in 
fact  been  for  some  time  the  popular  craze  of  the  day. 
By  this  many  fools  have  been  deeply  impressed  and 
many  pedants  shocked  and  put  off.  The  present  writer 
belongs  evidently  to  the  first  category,  for  he  was  for 
a  time  unduly  influenced  by  the  theories  of  Freud  and 
Rivers,  Jung,  and  Jones.  But  pedantry  will  remain 
the  master  passion  in  the  student,  and  subsequent 
reflection  soon  chilled  the  initial  enthusiasms. 

This  process  with  all  its  ramifications  can  be 
followed  by  the  careful  reader  in  this  little  volume. 
I  do  not  want,  however,  to  raise  expectations  of  a 
dramatic  volte-face.  I  have  never  been  in  any  sense 
a  follower  of  psycho-analytic  practice,  or  an  adherent 
of  psycho-analytic  theory  ;  and  now,  while  impatient 
of  the  exorbitant  claims  of  psycho-analysis,  of  its 
chaotic  arguments  and  tangled  terminology,  I  must 
yet  acknowledge  a  deep  sense  of  indebtedness  to  it 
for  stimulation  as  well  as  for  valuable  instruction  in 
some  aspects  of  human  psychology. 


Vlll 


PREFACE 


Psycho-analysis  has  plunged  us  into  the  midst  of 
a  dynamic  theory  of  the  mind,  it  has  given  to  the  study 
of  mental  processes  a  concrete  turn,  it  has  led  us  to 
concentrate  on  child  psychology  and  the  history  of 
the  individual.  Last  but  i;iot  least,  it  has  forced 
upon  us  the  consideration  of  the  unofficial  and 
unacknowledged  sides  of  human  life. 

The  open  treatment  of  sex  and  of  various  shameful 
meanesses  and  vanities  in  man — the  very  things  for 
which  psycho-analysis  is  most  hated  and  reviled — 
is  in  my  opinion  of  the  greatest  value  to  science,  and 
should  endear  psycho-analysis,  above  all  to  the 
student  of  man  ;  that  is,  if  he  wants  to  study  his 
subject  without  irrelevant  trappings  and  even  without 
the  fig  leaf.  As  a  pupil  and  follower  of  Havelock  Ellis, 
I  for  one  shall  not  accuse  Freud  of  "  pan-sexualism  " 
— however  profoundly  I  disagree  with  his  treatment 
of  the  sex  impulse.  Nor  shall  I  accept  his  views  under 
protest,  righteously  washing  my  hands  of  the  dirt 
with  which  they  are  covered.  Man  is  an  animal,  and, 
as  such,  at  times  unclean,  and  the  honest  anthro- 
pologist has  to  face  this  fact.  The  student's  grievance 
against  psycho-analysis  is  not  that  it  has  treated  sex 
openly  and  with  due  emphasis,  but  that  it  has 
treated  it  incorrectly. 

As  to  the  chequered  history  of  the  present  volume, 
the  first  two  parts  were  written  much  earlier  than 
the  rest.     Many  ideas  laid  down  there  were  formed 


PREFACE  ix 

while  I  was  engaged  in  studying  the  Hfe  of  Melanesian 
communities  on  a  coral  archipelago.  The  instruc- 
tions sent  to  me  by  my  friend  Professor  C.  G.  Seligman, 
and  some  literature  with  which  he  kindly  supplied 
me,  stimulated  me  to  reflect  on  the  manner  in  which 
the  Oedipus  complex  and  other  manifestations  of 
the  "  unconscious  "  might  appear  in  a  community 
founded  on  mother-right.  The  actual  observations 
on  the  matrilineal  complex  among  Melanesians  are 
to  my  knowledge  the  first  application  of  psycho- 
analytic theory  to  the  study  of  savage  life,  and  as 
such  may  be  of  some  interest  to  the  student  of  man, 
of  his  mind  and  of  his  culture.  My  conclusions  are 
couched  in  a  terminology  more  psycho-analytic  than 
I  should  like  to  use  now.  Even  so  I  do  not  go  much 
beyond  such  words  as  "  complex  "  and  "  repression  ", 
using  both  in  a  perfectly  definite  and  empirical  sense. 
As  my  reading  advanced,  I  found  myself  less 
and  less  inclined  to  accept  in  a  wholesale  manner  the 
conclusions  of  Freud,  still  less  those  of  every  brand  and 
sub-brand  of  psycho-analysis.  As  an  anthropologist 
I  feel  more  especially  that  ambitious  theories  with 
regard  to  savages,  hypotheses  of  the  origin  of  human 
institutions  and  accounts  of  the  history  of  culture, 
should  be  based  on  a  sound  knowledge  of  primitive 
hfe,  as  well  as  of  the  unconscious  or  conscious  aspects 
of  the  human  mind.  After  all  neither  group-marriage 
nor   totemism,   neither   avoidance   of   mother-in-law 


X  PREFACE 

nor  magic  happen  in  the  "  unconscious  "  ;  they  are  all 
solid  sociological  and  cultural  facts,  and  to  deal  with 
them  theoretically  requires  a  type  of  experience  which 
cannot  be  acquired  in  the  consulting  room.  That  my 
misgivings  are  justified  I  have  been  able  to  convince 
myself  by  a  careful  scrutiny  of  Freud's  Totem  and 
Taboo,  of  his  Group-Psychology  and  the  Analysis  of 
the  Ego,  of  Australian  Totemism  by  Roheim  and  of 
the  anthropological  works  of  Reik,  Rank,  and  Jones. 
My  conclusions  the  reader  will  find  substantiated  in 
the  third  part  of  the  present  book. 

In  the  last  part  of  the  book  I  have  tried  to  set  forth 
my  positive  views  on  the  origins  of  culture.  I  have 
there  given  an  outline  of  the  changes  which  the  animal 
nature  of  the  human  species  must  have  undergone 
under  the  anomalous  conditions  imposed  upon  it  by 
culture.  More  especially  have  I  attempted  to  show 
that  repressions  of  sexual  instinct  and  some  sort  of 
"  complex  "  must  have  arisen  as  a  mental  by-product 
of  the  creation  of  culture. 

The  last  part  of  the  book,  on  Instinct  and  Culture, 
is  in  my  opinion  the  most  important  and  at  the  same 
time  the  most  debatable.  From  the  anthropological 
point  of  view  at  least,  it  is  a  pioneering  piece  of  work  ; 
an  attempt  at  an  exploration  of  the  "  no-specialist's- 
land  "  between  the  science  of  man  and  that  of  the 
animal.  No  doubt  most  of  my  arguments  will  have 
to  be  recast,  but  I  believe  that  they  raise  important 


PREFACE  xi 

issues  which  will  sooner  or  later  have  to  be  considered 
by  the  biologist  and  animal  psychologist,  as  well  as 
by  the  student  of  culture. 

As  regards  information  from  animal  psychology  and 
biology  I  have  had  to  rely  on  general  reading.  I  have 
used  mainly  the  works  of  Darwin  and  Havelock  Ellis  ; 
Professors  Lloyd  Morgan,  Herrick,  and  Thorndike  ; 
of  Dr.  Heape,  Dr.  Kohler  and  Mr.  Pyecroft,  and  such 
information  as  can  be  found  in  the  sociological  books 
of  Westermarck,  Hobhouse,  Espinas  and  others. 
I  have  not  given  detailed  references  in  the  text  and 
I  wish  here  to  express  my  indebtedness  to  these 
works ;  most  of  all  to  those  of  Professor  Lloyd  Morgan, 
whose  conception  of  instinct  seems  to  me  the  most 
adequate  and  whose  observations  I  have  found  most 
useful.  I  discovered  too  late  that  there  is  some 
discrepancy  between  my  use  of  the  terms  instinct  and 
habit  and  that  of  Professor  Lloyd  Morgan,  and  in  our 
respective  conceptions  of  plasticity  of  instincts.  I  do 
not  think  that  this  implies  any  serious  divergence 
of  opinion.  I  believe  also  that  culture  introduces 
a  new  dimension  in  the  plasticity  of  instincts  and 
that  here  the  animal  psychologist  can  profit  from 
becoming  acquainted  with  the  anthropologist's  con- 
tributions to  the  problem. 

I  have  received  in  the  preparation  of  this  book  much 
stimulation  and  help  in  talking  the  matter  over  with 
my   friends   Mrs.    Brenda    Z.    Seligman   of    Oxford ; 


xu 


PREFACE 


Dr.  R.  H.  Lowie  and  Professor  Kroeber  of  California 
University ;  Mr.  Firth  of  New  Zealand  ;  Dr.  W.  A. 
White  of  Washington,  and  Dr.  H.  S.  Sulhvan  of 
Baltimore  ;  Professor  Herrick  of  Chicago  University, 
and  Dr.  Ginsberg  of  the  London  School  of  Economics  ; 
Dr.  G.  V.  Hamilton  and  Dr.  S.  E.  JelUffe  of  New  York  ; 
Dr.  E.  Miller  of  Harley  Street  ;  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Jaime 
de  Angulo  of  Berkeley,  California,  and  Mr.  C.  K. 
Ogden  of  Cambridge ;  Professor  Radcliffe-Brown  of 
Cape  Town  and  Sydney,  and  Mr.  Lawrence  K.  Frank 
of  New  York  City.  The  field-work  on  which  the  book 
is  based  has  been  made  possible  by  the  munificence 
of  Mr.  Robert  Mond. 

My  friend  Mr.  Paul  Khuner  of  Vienna,  to  whom 
this  book  is  dedicated,  has  helped  me  greatly  by  his 
competent  criticism  which  cleared  my  ideas  on  the 
present  subject  as  on  many  others. 

B.  M. 
Department  of  Anthropology, 
London  School  of  Economics, 

University  of  London. 
February.  1927. 


CONTENTS 

PAGE 

Preface         ......  vii 

PART    I 
THE   FORMATION   OF   A   COMPLEX 

CHAPTER 

I.     The  Problem  .  .  .         .  i 

II.     The    Family   in   Father-right   and 

Mother-right     ....  8 

III.  The    First    Stage    of    the    Family 

Drama        .....         i8 

IV.  Fatherhood  in  Mother-right  .         25 
V.     Infantile  Sexuality       •         •         •         33 

VI.  The  Apprenticeship  to  Life  .         .  40 

VII.  The  Sexuality  of  Later  Childhood  49 

VIII.  Puberty           .....  59 

IX.  The  Complex  of  Mother-right       ,  74 

PART    II 

THE   MIRROR  OF   TRADITION 

I.  Complex  and  Myth  in  Mother-right  83 

II.  Disease  and   Perversion         .         .  85 

III.  Dreams  and  Deeds          ...  91 

IV.  Obscenity  and  Myth       .         .         .  104 


xiv  CONTENTS 

PART    III 
PSYCHO-ANALYSIS     AND     ANTHROPOLOGY 

PAGE 

I.     The  Rift  Between  Psycho-analysis 

AND  Social  Science  .         .  135 

II.     A  "  Repressed  Complex  "        .  142 

III.  "  The  Primordial  Cause  of  Culture  "  148 

IV.  The  Consequences  of  the  Parricide  154 
V.     The   Original   Parricide  Analysed  159 

VI.     Complex  or  Sentiment  ?  .  .  173 

PART    IV 

INSTINCT  AND  CULTURE 

I.     The    Transition    from   Nature    to 

Culture     .....  179 
II.     The    Family    as    the    Cradle    of 

Nascent  Culture       .         .         .  184 

III.  Rut  and  Mating  in  Animal  and  Man  193 

IV.  Marital  Relations          .         .         .  201 
V.     Parental  Love        ....  207 

VI.     The    Persistence    of    Family    Ties 

in  Man       .  .  .  ...  218 

VII.    The  Plasticity  of  Human  Instincts  225 

VIII.     From  Instinct  to  Sentiment  .         .  229 
IX.     Motherhood  and  the   Temptations 

OF  Incest  .....  243 

X.     Authority  and  Repression     .  253 

XI.     Father-right  and  Mother-right     .  263 

XII.     Culture  amd  the  Complex      .         .  274 

Index       ......  281 


"  After  ignoring  impulses  for  a  long  time  in  behalf 
of  sensations,  modern  psychology  now  tends  to  start 
out  with  an  inventory  and  description  of  instinctive 
activities.  This  is  an  undoubted  improvement.  But 
when  it  tries  to  explain  complicated  events  in  personal 
and  social  life  by  direct  reference  to  these  nature  powers 
the  explanation  becomes  hazy  and  forced  .  .  . 

"  We  need  to  know  about  the  social  conditions  which 
have  educated  original  aztivities  into  definite  and 
significant  dispositions  before  we  can  discuss  the 
psychological  element  in  society.  This  is  the  true 
meaning  of  social  psychology  .  .  .  Native  human 
nature  supplies  the  raw  materials  but  custom  furnishes 
the  machinery  and  the  designs  ...  Man  is  a  creature 
of  habit,  not  of  reason  nor  yet  of  instinct. 

"  The  treatment  of  sex  by  psycho-analysts  is  most 
instructive,  for  it  flagrantly  exhibits  both  the  consequences 
of  artificial  simplification  and  the  transformation  of 
social  results  into  psychic  causes.  Writers,  usually 
male,  hold  forth  on  the  psychology  of  woman  as  if  they 
were  dealing  with  a  Platonic  universal  entity  .  .  .  They 
treat  phenomena,  which  are  peculiarly  symptoms  of  the 
civilization  of  the  West  at  the  present  time,  as  if  they 
were  the  necessary  efforts  of  fixed  native  impulses  of 
human  nature," 

JOHN    DEWEY,  in  Human  Nature  and  Conduct 


PART    I 

THE  FORMATION   OF  A  COMPLEX 

I 

THE   PROBLEM 

pSYCHO-ANALYSIS  was  born  from  medical 
practice,  and  its  theories  are  mainly  psychological, 
but  it  stands  in  close  relation  to  two  other  branches 
of  learning — biology  and  the  science  of  society. 
It  is  perhaps  one  of  its  chief  merits  that  it  forges 
another  link  between  these  three  divisions  of  the  science 
of  man.  The  psychological  views  of  Freud — his 
theories  of  conflict,  repression,  the  unconscious,  the 
formation  of  complexes — form  the  best  elaborated  part 
of  psycho-analysis,  and  they  cover  its  proper  field. 
The  biological  doctrine — the  treatment  of  sexuality  and 
of  its  relation  to  other  instincts,  the  concept  of  the 
'  libido  '  and  its  various  transformations — is  a  part  of 
thetheory  which  is  much  less  finished,  less  free  from 
contradictions  and  lacunae,  and  which  receives  more 
criticism,  partly  spurious  and  partly  justified.  The 
sociological  aspect,  which  most  interests  us  here,  will 
deserve  more  attention.  Curiously  enough,  though 
sociology  and   anthropology  have  contributed   most 


2  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

evidence  in  favour  of  psycho-analysis,  and  though  the 
doctrine  of  the  Oedipus  complex  has  obviously  a 
sociological  aspect,  this  aspect  has  received  the  least 
attention. 

Psycho-analytic  doctrine  is  essentially  a  theory  of 
the  influence  of  family  life  on  the  human  mind.  We 
are  shown  how  the  passions,  stresses  and  conflicts 
of  the  child  in  relation  to  its  father,  mother, 
brother  and  sister  result  in  the  formation  of  certain 
permanent  mental  attitudes  or  sentiments  towards 
them,  sentiments  which,  partly  living  in  memory, 
partly  embedded  in  the  unconscious,  influence  the 
later  life  of  the  individual  in  his  relations  to 
society.  T  am  using  the  word  sentiment  in  the  technical 
sense  given  to  it  by  Mr.  A.  F.  Shand,  with  all  the 
important  implications  which  it  has  received  in 
his  theory  of  emotions  and  instincts. 

The  sociological  nature  of  this  doctrine  is  obvious — 
the  whole  Freudian  drama  is  played  out  within  a 
definite  type  of  social  organization,  in  the  narrow  circle 
of  the  family,  composed  of  father,  mother,  and 
children.  Thus  the  family  complex,  the  most  impor- 
tant psychological  fact  according  to  Freud,  is  due 
to  the  action  of  a  certain  type  of  social  grouping 
upon  the  human  mind.  Again,  the  mental  imprint 
received  by  every  individual  in  youth  exercises  further 
social  influences,  in  that  it  predisposes  him  to  the 
formation  of  certain  ties,  and  moulds  his  receptive 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX        3 

dispositions  and  his  creative  power  in  the  domains 
of  tradition,  art,  thought,  and  reUgion. 

Thus  the  sociologist  feels  that  to  the  psycho- 
logical treatment  of  the  complex  there  should  be 
added  two  sociological  chapters :  an  introduction 
with  an  account  of  the  sociological  nature  of  family 
influences,  and  an  epilogue  containing  the  analysis 
of  the  consequences  of  the  complex  for  society.  Two 
problems  therefore  emerge  for  the  sociologist. 

First  problem.  If  family  life  is  so  fateful  for  human 
mentality,  its  character  deserves  more  attention. 
For  the  fact  is  that  the  family  is  not  the  same  in  all 
human  societies.  Its  constitution  varies  greatly  with 
the  level  of  development  and  with  the  character  of 
the  civilization  of  the  people,  and  it  is  not  the  same 
in  the  different  strata  of  the  same  society.  According 
to  theories  current  even  to-day  among  anthropo- 
logists, the  family  has  changed  enormously  during 
the  development  of  humanity,  passing  from  its  first 
promiscuous  form,  based  on  sexual  and  economic 
conununism,  through  '  group-family  '  based  on  '  group- 
marriage',  'consanguineous  family',  based  on 
'  Punalua  marriage ',  through  the  Grossfamilie  and 
clan  kindred  to  its  final  form  in  our  present-day 
society — the  individual  family  based  on  monogamous 
marriage  and  the  patria  potestas.  But  apart  from  such 
anthropological  constructions  which  combine  some 
fact  with  much  hypothesis,  there  is  no  doubt  that 


4  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

from  actual  observation  among  present-day  savages 
we  can  see  great  variations  in  the  constitution  of  the 
family.  There  are  differences  depending  on  the 
distribution  of  power  which,  vested  in  a  varying 
degree  in  the  father,  give  the  several  forms  of 
patriarchy,  or  vested  in  the  mother,  the  various 
sub-divisions  of  mother-right.  There  are  considerable 
divergencies  in  the  methods  of  counting  and  regarding 
descent — matriliny  based  on  ignorance  of  fatherhood 
and  patriUny  in  spite  of  this  ignorance  ;  patriUny 
due  to  power,  and  patriliny  due  to  economic  reasons. 
Moreover,  differences  in  settlement,  housing,  sources 
of  food  supply,  division  of  labour  and  so  on,  alter 
greatly  the  constitution  of  the  human  family  among 
the  various  races  and  peoples  of  mankind. 

The  problem  therefore  emerges  :  do  the  conflicts, 
passions  and  attachments  within  the  family  vary 
with  its  constitution,  or  do  they  remain  the  same 
throughout  humanity  ?  If  they  vary,  as  in  fact 
they  do,  then  the  nuclear  complex  of  the  family 
cannot  remain  constant  in  all  human  races  and 
peoples ;  it  must  vary  with  the  constitution  of  the 
family.  The  main  task  of  psycho-analytic  theory 
is,  therefore,  to  study  the  limits  of  the  variation  ; 
to  frame  the  appropriate  formula;  and  finally,  to 
discuss  the  outstanding  types  of  family  constitution 
and  to  state  the  corresponding  forms  of  the  nuclear 
complex. 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX        5 

With  perhaps  one  exception,^  this  problem  has  not 
yet  been  raised,  at  least  not  in  an  explicit  and 
direct  manner.  The  complex  exclusively  known 
to  the  Freudian  School,  and  assumed  by  them  to  be 
universal,  I  mean  the  Oedipus  complex,  corresponds 
essentially  to  our  patrilineal  Aryan  family  with  the 
developed  patria  potestas,  buttressed  by  Roman  law 
and  Christian  morals,  and  accentuated  by  the 
modern  economic  conditions  of  the  well-to-do  bour- 
geoisie. Yet  this  complex  is  assumed  to  exist  in  every 
savage  or  barbarous  society.  This  certainly  cannot  be 
correct,  and  a  detailed  discussion  of  the  first  problem 
will  show  us  how  far  this  assumption  is  untrue. 

The  second  problem.  What  is  the  nature  of  the 
influence  of  the  family  complex  on  the  formation 
of  myth,  legend,  and  fairy  tale,  on  certain  types 
of  savage  and  barbarous  customs,  forms  of  social 
organization  and  achievements  of  material  culture  ? 
This  problem  has  been  clearly  recognized  by  the 
psycho-analytic  writers  who  have  been  applying 
their  principles  to  the  study  of  myth,  reUgion,  and 
culture.  But  the  theory  of  how  the  constitution  of  the 
family  influences  culture  and  society  through  the  forces 
of  the    family    complex    has  not  been    worked  out 

^  I  refer  to  Mr.  J.  C.  Fliigel's  The  Psycho- Analytic  Study  of  the 
Family,  which,  though  written  by  a  psychologist,  is  throughout 
orientated  in  the  sociological  direction.  The  later  chapters,  especially 
XV  and  XVII,  contain  much  which  is  an  approach  to  the  present 
problem,  although  the  writer  does  not  formulate  it  explicitly. 


6  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

correctly.  Most  of  the  views  bearing  on  this  second 
problem  need  a  thorough  revision  from  the  sociological 
point  of  view.  The  concrete  solutions,  on  the  other 
hand,  offered  by  Freud,  Rank  and  Jones  of  the  actual 
mythological  problems  are  much  sounder  than  their 
general  principle  that  the  "  myth  is  the  secular  dream 
of  the  race  ". 

Psycho-analysis,  by  emphasizing  that  the  interest 
of  primitive  man  is  centred  in  himself  and  in  the 
people  around  him,  and  is  of  a  concrete  and  dynamic 
nature,  has  given  the  right  foundation  to  primitive 
psychology,  hitherto  frequently  immeshed  in  a  false 
view  of  the  dispassionate  interest  of  man  in  nature 
and  of  his  concern  with  philosophic  speculations 
about  his  destiny.  But  by  ignoring  the  first  problem, 
and  by  making  the  tacit  assumption  that  the  Oedipus 
complex  exists  in  all  types  of  society,  certain  errors 
have  crept  into  the  anthropological  work  of  psycho- 
analysts. Thus  they  cannot  reach  correct  results 
when  they  try  to  trace  the  Oedipus  complex,  essentially 
patriarchal  in  character,  in  a  matrilineal  society ;  or 
when  they  play  about  with  the  hypotheses  of  group- 
marriage  or  promiscuity,  as  if  no  special  precautions 
were  necessary  when  approaching  conditions  so  entirely 
foreign  to  the  constitution  of  our  own  form  of 
family  as  it  is  known  to  psycho-analytic  practice. 
Involved  in  such  contradictions,  the  anthropo- 
logizing  psycho-analyst  makes  a  hypothetical  assump- 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX        7 

tion  about  some  type  of  primitive  horde,  or  about 
a  prehistoric  prototype  of  the  totemic  sacrifice,  or 
about  the  dream  character  of  the  myth,  usually 
quite  incompatible  with  the  fundamental  principles 
of  psycho-analysis  itself. 

Part  I  of  the  present  work  is  essentially  an 
attempt  based  on  facts  observed  at  first  hand  among 
savages,  to  discuss  the  first  problem — the  dependence 
of  the  nuclear  complex  upon  the  constitution  of 
the  family.  The  treatment  of  the  second  problem 
is  reserved  for  Part  II,  while  in  the  last  two  parts  the 
same  twin  subjects  are  discussed  in  a  general  manner. 


II 


THE   FAMILY    IN   FATHER-RIGHT  AND 
MOTHER-RIGHT 

'  I  ^HE  best  waj^  to  examine  this  first  problem — in 
what  manner  the  '  family  complex  '  is  influenced 
and  modified  by  the  constitution  of  the  family  in  a 
given  society — is  to  enter  concretely  into  the  matter, 
to  follow  up  the  formation  of  the  complex  in  the 
course  of  typical  family  life,  and  to  do  it  com- 
paratively in  the  case  of  different  civilizations.  I  do 
not  propose  here  to  survey  all  forms  of  human 
family,  but  shall  compare  in  detail  two  types,  known 
to  me  from  personal  observation :  the  patrilineal 
family  of  modern  civilization,  and  the  matrilineal 
family  of  certain  island  communities  in  North-Western 
Melanesia.  These  two  cases,  however,  represent 
perhaps  the  two  most  radically  different  types  of 
family  known  to  sociological  observation,  and  will 
thus  serve  our  purpose  well.  A  few  words  will  be 
necessary  to  introduce  the  Trobriand  Islanders  of 
North-Eastem  New  Guinea  (or  North-Western 
Melanesia)  who  will  form  the  other  term  of  our 
comparison,  besides  our  own  culture. 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX        9 

These  natives  are  matrilineal,  that  is,  they  Uve 
in  a  social  order  in  which  kinship  is  reckoned  through 
the  mother  only,  and  succession  and  inheritance 
descend  in  the  female  line.  This  means  that  the  boy 
or  girl  belongs  to  the  mother's  family,  clan  and  com- 
munity :  the  boy  succeeds  to  the  dignities  and  social 
position  of  the  mother's  brother,  and  it  is  not  from 
the  father  but  from  the  maternal  uncle  or  maternal 
aunt,  respectively,  that  a  child  inherits  its  possessions. 

Every  man  and  woman  in  the  Trobriands  settles 
down  eventually  to  matrimony,  after  a  period  of  sexual 
play  in  childhood,  followed  by  general  licence  in 
adolescence,  and  later  by  a  time  when  the  lovers  live 
together  in  a  more  permanent  intrigue,  sharing  with 
two  or  three  other  couples  a  communal  '  bachelor's 
house  '.  Matrimony,  which  is  usually  monogamous, 
except  with  chiefs,  who  have  several  wives,  is 
a  permanent  union,  involving  sexual  exclusiveness, 
a  common  economic  existence,  and  an  independent 
household.  At  first  glance  it  might  appear  to 
a  superficial  observer  to  be  the  exact  pattern 
of  marriage  among  ourselves.  In  reaUty,  however,  it  is 
entirely  different.  To  begin  with,  the  husband  is 
not  regarded  as  the  father  of  the  children  in  the 
sense  in  which  we  use  this  word ;  physiologically 
he  has  nothing  to  do  with  their  birth,  according 
to  the  ideas  of  the  natives,  who  are  ignorant  of 
physical  fatherhood.     Children,  in  native  belief,  are 


10  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

inserted  into  the  mother's  womb  as  tiny  spirits, 
generally  by  the  agency  of  the  spirit  of  a  deceased 
kinswoman  of  the  mother.^  Her  husband  has  then 
to  protect  and  cherish  the  children,  to  '  receive 
them  in  his  arms  '  when  they  are  bom,  but  they 
are  not  '  his  '  in  the  sense  that  he  has  had  a  share 
in  their  procreation. 

The  father  is  thus  a  beloved,  benevolent  friend, 
but  not  a  recognized  kinsman  of  the  children. 
He  is  a  stranger,  having  authority  through  his 
personal  relations  to  the  child,  but  not  through  his 
sociological  position  in  the  lineage.  Real  kinship, 
that  is  identity  of  substance,  'same  body',  exists 
only  through  the  mother.  The  authority  over  the 
children  is  vested  in  the  mother's  brother.  Now 
this  person,  owing  to  the  strict  taboo  which  prevents 
all  friendly  relations  between  brothers  and  sisters, 
can  never  be  intimate  with  the  mother,  or  therefore 
with  her  household.  She  recognizes  his  authority, 
and  bends  before  him  as  a  commoner  before  a  chief, 
but  there  can  never  be  tender  relations  between 
them.  Her  children  are,  however,  his  only  heirs 
and  successors,  and  he  wields  over  them  the  direct 
potestas.  At  his  death  his  worldly  goods  pass  into 
their  keeping,  and  during  his  lifetime  he  has  to  hand 


^  See  the  writer's  The  Father  in  Primitive  Psychology  (Psyche 
Miniatures),  1927,  and  "  Baloma,  Spirits  of  the  Dead  ",  Journ.  R. 
Anthrop.  Inst..  1916. 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      ii 

over  to  them  any  special  accomplishment  he  may 
possess — dances,  songs,  myths,  magic  and  crafts. 
He  also  it  is  who  supplies  his  sister  and  her  household 
with  food,  the  greater  part  of  his  garden  produce  going 
to  them.  To  the  father,  therefore,  the  children  look 
only  for  loving  care  and  tender  companionship. 
Their  mother's  brother  represents  the  principle  of 
discipline,  authority,  and  executive  power  within 
the  family.  1 

The  bearing  of  the  wife  towards  her  husband  is  not 
at  all  servile.  She  has  her  own  possessions  and  her 
own  sphere  of  influence,  private  and  public.  It 
never  happens  that  the  children  see  their  mother 
buUied  by  the  father.  On  the  other  hand,  the  father 
is  only  partially  the  bread-winner,  and  has  to 
work  mainly  for  his  own  sisters,  while  the  boys  know 
that  when  they  grow  up  they  in  turn  will  have  to 
work  for  their  sisters'  households. 

Marriage  is  patrilocal  :  that  is,  the  girl  goes  to  join 
her  husband  in  his  house  and  migrates  to  his  com- 
munity, if  she  comes  from  another,  which  is  in  general 
the  case.  The  children  therefore  grow  up  in  a  com- 
munity where  they  are  legally  strangers,  having  no 
right  to  the  soil,  no  lawful  pride  in  the  village  glory  ; 

^  For  an  account  of  the  strange  economic  conditions  of  these 
natives,  see  the  writer's  "  Primitive  Economics  "  in  Economic 
Journal,  1921,  and  Argonauts  of  the  Western  Pacific,  chapters  ii 
and  vi.  The  legal  side  has  been  fully  discussed  in  Crime  and  Custom 
in  Savage  Society,   1926. 


12  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

while  their  home,  their  traditional  centre  of  local 
patriotism,  their  possessions,  and  their  pride  of 
ancestorship  are  in  another  place.  Strange  combina- 
tions and  confusion  arise,  associated  with  this  dual 
influence. 

From  an  early  age  boys  and  girls  of  the  same  mother 
are  separated  in  the  family,  owing  to  the  strict  taboo 
which  enjoins  that  there  shall  be  no  intimate  relations 
between  them,  and  that  above  all  any  subject  con- 
nected with  sex  should  never  interest  them  in  common. 
It  thus  comes  about  that  though  the  brother  is  really 
the  person  in  authority  over  the  sister,  the  taboo 
forbids  him  to  use  this  authority  when  it  is  a  question 
of  her  marriage.  The  privilege  of  giving  or  withholding 
consent,  therefore,  is  left  to  the  parents,  and  the 
father — ^her  mother's  husband — is  the  person  who 
has  most  authority,  in  this  one  matter  of  his  daughter's 
marriage. 

The  great  difference  in  the  two  family  types 
which  we  are  going  to  compare  is  beginning  to  be 
clear.  In  our  own  type  of  family  we  have  the 
authoritative,  powerful  husband  and  father  backed 
up  by  society. 1    We  have  also  the  economic  arrange- 


^  I  should  like  to  mention  that  although  under  "  our  own  " 
civilization  I  am  here  speaking  about  the  European  and  American 
communities  in  general,  I  have  in  mind  primarily  the  average  type 
of  continental  family,  as  this  was  the  material  on  which  the  con- 
clusions of  psycho-analysis  were  founded.  Whether  among  the  higher 
social  strata  of  the  Western  European  or  of  the  North  American 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      i,^ 

ment  whereby  he  is  the  bread-winner,  and  can — 
nominally  at  least — ^withhold  supplies  or  be  generous 
with  them  at  his  will.  In  the  Trobriands,  on  the  other 
hand,  we  have  the  independent  mother  and  her  husband, 
who  has  nothing  to  do  with  the  procreation  of  the 
children,  and  is  not  the  bread-winner,  who  cannot 
leave  his  possessions  to  the  children,  and  has 
socially  no  estabUshed  authority  over  them.  The 
mother's  relatives  on  the  other  hand  are  endowed  with 
very  powerful  influence,  especially  her  brother,  who  is 
the  authoritative  person,  the  producer  of  supplies  for 
the  family,  and  whose  possessions  the  sons  will  inherit 
at  his  death.  Thus  the  pattern  of  social  life  and  the 
constitution  of  the  family  are  arranged  on  entirely 
different  lines  from  those  of  our  culture. 

It  might  appear  that  while  it  would  be  interesting 
to  survey  the  family  life  in  a  matrilineal  society, 
it  is  superfluous  to  dwell  on  our  own  family  Ufe,  so 
intimately  known  to  everyone  of  us  and  so  frequently 
recapitulated  in  recent  psycho-analytic  literature.  We 
might  simply  take  it  for  granted.  But  first  of  all, 
it  is  essential  in  a  strict  comparative  treatment  to  keep 
the  terms  of  the  comparison  clearly  before  our  eyes ; 

cities  we  are  now  slowly  moving  towards  a  condition  of  mother- 
right  more  akin  to  the  legal  ideas  of  Melanesia  than  to  those  of 
Roman  Law  and  of  continental  custom,  I  do  not  dare  to  prophesy. 
If  the  thesis  of  this  book  be  correct,  some  modern  developments 
in  matters  of  sex  ("  petting  parties  ",  etc.),  as  well  as  the  weakening 
of  the  patriarchal  system,  should  deeply  modify  the  configurations 
of  the  sentiments  within  the  family. 


14  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

and  then,  since  the  matriUneal  data  to  be  given  here 
have  been  collected  by  special  methods  of  anthropological 
field  work,  it  is  indispensable  to  cast  the  European 
material  into  the  same  shape,  as  if  it  had  been  observed 
by  the  same  methods  and  looked  at  from  the  anthropo- 
logical point  of  view.  I  have  not,  as  stated  already, 
found  in  any  psycho-analytic  account  any  direct 
and  consistent  reference  to  the  social  milieu,  still 
less  any  discussion  of  how  the  nuclear  complex  and 
its  causes  vary  with  the  social  stratum  in  our  society. 
Yet  it  is  obvious  that  the  infantile  conflicts  will  not 
be  the  same  in  the  lavish  nursery  of  the  wealthy 
bourgeois  as  in  the  cabin  of  the  peasant,  or  in  the  one- 
room  tenement  of  the  poor  working-man.  Now  just 
in  order  to  vindicate  the  truth  of  the  psycho-analytic 
doctrine,  it  would  be  important  to  consider  the  lower 
and  the  ruder  strata  of  society,  where  a  spade  is  called 
a  spade,  where  the  child  is  in  permanent  contact 
with  the  parents,  living  and  eating  in  the  same  room 
and  sleeping  in  the  same  bed,  where  no  '  parent  sub- 
stitute '  complicates  the  picture,  no  good  manners 
modify  the  brutality  of  the  impact,  and  where  the 
jealousies  and  petty  competitions  of  daily  life  clash 
in   hardened   though   repressed   hostility.^ 

^  My  personal  knowledge  of  the  life,  customs  and  psychology  of 
Eastern  European  peasants  has  allowed  me  to  ascertain  deep 
differences  between  the  illiterate  and  the  educated  classes  of  the 
same  society  as  regards  the  mental  attitude  of  parents  to  children 
and  vice  versa. 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      15 

It  may  be  added  that  when  we  study  the  nuclear 
complex  and  its  bed-rock  of  social  and  biological 
actuality  in  order  to  apply  it  to  the  study  of  folk-lore, 
the  need  of  not  neglecting  the  peasant  and  the 
illiterate  classes  is  still  more  urgent.  For  the  popular 
traditions  originated  in  a  condition  more  akin  to  that 
of  the  modern  Central  and  Eastern  European  peasant, 
or  of  the  poor  artisan,  than  to  that  of  the  overfed 
and  nervously  overwrought  people  of  modern  Vienna, 
London,  or  New  York. 

In  order  to  make  the  comparison  stand  out 
clearly  I  shall  divide  the  history  of  childhood 
into  periods,  and  treat  each  of  them  separately, 
describing  and  comparing  it  in  both  societies.  The 
clear  distinction  of  stages  in  the  history  of  family  life 
is  important  in  the  treatment  of  the  nuclear  complex, 
for  psycho-analysis — and  here  really  lies  one  of  its 
chief  merits — has  brought  to  light  the  stratification 
of  the  human  mind,  and  shown  its  rough  corre- 
spondence to  the  stages  in  the  child's  development. 
The  distinct  periods  of  sexuality,  the  crises,  the 
accompanying  repressions  and  amnesias  in  which 
some  memories  are  relegated  to  the  unconscious — 
all  these  imply  a  clear  division  of  the  child's  life  into 
periods.^     For  the  present  purpose  it  will  be  enough 

1  Although  in  Professor  Freud's  treatment  of  infantile  sexuality, 
the  division  into  several  distinct  stages  plays  a  fundamental  role,  yet 
in  his  most  detailed  work  on  the  subject  (Drei  Abhandlungen  zur 
Sexualtheorie,  5th   edition)  the  scheme  of  the  successive  stages  is 


i6  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

to  distinguish  four  periods  in  the  development  of  the 
child,  defined  by  biological  and  sociological  criteria. 

1.  Infancy,  in  which  the  baby  is  dependent  for  its 
nourishment  on  the  mother's  breast  and  for  safety 
on  the  protection  of  the  parent,  in  which  he  cannot 
move  independently  nor  articulate  his  wishes  and 
ideas.  We  shall  reckon  this  period  as  ranging  from 
birth  to  the  time  of  weaning.  Among  savage  peoples, 
this  period  lasts  from  about  two  to  three  years.  In 
civilized  communities  it  is  much  shorter — ^generally 
about  one  year  only.  But  it  is  better  to  take  the 
natural  landmarks  to  di\dde  the  stages  of  childhood. 
The  child  is  at  this  time  physiologically  bound  up 
with  the  family. 

2.  Babyhood,  the  time  in  which  the  offspring, 
while  attached  to  the  mother  and  unable  to  lead 
an  independent  existence,  yet  can  move,  talk,  and 
freely  play  round  about  her.  We  shall  reckon  this 
period  to  take  up  three  or  four  years,  and  thus  bring 
the  child  to  the  age  of  about  six.  This  term  of  life 
covers  the  first  gradual  severing  of  the  family  bonds. 

not  lucidly  nor  even  explicitly  drawn  up.  This  makes  the  reading 
of  this  book  somewhat  difficult  to  a  non-specialist  in  psycho- 
analysis, and  it  creates  certain  ambiguities  and  contradictions, 
real  and  apparent,  which  the  present  writer  has  not  yet  fully  solved. 
Fliigel's  otherwise  excellent  exposition  of  psycho-analysis  {op.  cit.) 
also  suffers  from  this  defect,  especially  regrettable  in  a  work  which 
sets  out  to  clear  up  and  systematize  the  doctrine.  The  word 
'  child  '  throughout  the  book  is  used  sometimes  to  mean  'baby  ', 
sometimes  '  adolescent ',  and  the  sense  as  a  rule  has  to  be  inferred 
from  the  context.  In  this  respect  I  hope  that  the  present  outline 
will  be  of  some  use. 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      17 

The  child  learns  to  move  away  from  the  family  and 
begins  to  be  self-sufficient. 

3.  Childhood,  the  attainment  of  relative  inde- 
pendence, the  epoch  of  roving  about  and  playing 
with  other  children.  This  is  the  time  also  when  in  all 
branches  of  humanity  and  in  all  classes  of  a  society  the 
child  begins  in  some  way  or  other  to  become  initiated 
into  full  membership  of  the  community.  Among 
some  savages,  the  preliminary  rites  of  initiation  begin. 
Among  others  and  among  our  own  peasants  and 
working  people,  especially  on  the  Continent,  the  child 
begins  to  be  apprenticed  to  his  future  economic  life. 
In  Western  European  and  American  communities 
children  begin  their  schooling  at  this  time.  This 
is  the  period  of  the  second  severing  from  family 
influences,  and  it  lasts  till  puberty,  which  forms  its 
natural  term. 

4.  Adolescence,  between  physiological  puberty  and 
full  social  maturity.  In  many  savage  communities, 
this  epoch  is  encompassed  by  the  principal  rites  of 
initiation,  and  in  other  tribes  it  is  the  epoch  in  which 
tribal  law  and  order  lay  their  claim  on  the  youth 
and  on  the  maiden.  In  modem  civilized  communities 
it  is  the  time  of  secondary  and  higher  schooling, 
or  else  of  the  final  apprenticeship  to  the  life  task. 
This  is  the  period  of  complete  emancipation  from 
the  family  atmosphere.  Among  savages  and  in  our 
own  lower  strata  it  normally  ends  with  marriage  and 
the  foundation  of  a  new  family. 


Ill 

THE  FIRST  STAGE  OF  THE  FAMILY  DRAMA 

TT  is  a  general  characteristic  of  the  mammals  that 
the  offspring  is  not  free  and  independent  at  birth, 
but  has  to  rely  for  its  nourishment,  safety,  warmth, 
cleanliness  and  bodily  comfort  on  the  care  of 
its  mother.  To  this  correspond  the  various  bodily 
arrangements  of  mother  and  child.  Physiologically 
there  exists  a  passionate  instinctive  interest  of  the 
mother  in  the  child,  and  a  craving  of  the  suckling 
for  the  maternal  organism,  for  the  warmth  of  her 
body,  the  support  of  her  arms  and,  above  all,  the  milk 
and  contact  of  her  breast.  At  first  the  relation  is 
determined  by  the  mother's  selective  passion — to  her 
only  her  own  offspring  is  dear,  while  the  baby  would 
be  satisfied  with  the  body  of  any  lactant  woman. 
But  soon  the  child  also  distinguishes,  and  his  attach- 
ment becomes  as  exclusive  and  individual  as  that 
of  the  mother.  Thus  birth  establishes  a  link  for 
life  between  mother  and  child. 

This  link  is  first  founded  on  the  biological  fact 
that  young  mammals  cannot  live  unaided,  and  thus 
the  species  depends  for  its  survival  on  one  of  the 
strongest    instincts,    that    of    maternal    love.     But 

18 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      19 

society  hastens  to  step  in  and  to  add  its  at  first  feeble 
decree  to  the  powerful  voice  of  nature.  In  all  human 
communities,  savage  or  civilized,  custom,  law  and 
morals,  sometimes  even  religion,  take  cognizance 
of  the  bond  between  mother  and  offspring,  usually 
at  a?  early  a  stage  as  the  beginning  of  gestation. 
The  mother,  sometimes  the  father  also,  has  to  keep 
various  taboos  and  observances,  or  perform  rites 
which  have  to  do  with  the  welfare  of  the  new  life 
within  the  womb.  Birth  is  always  an  important 
social  event,  round  which  cluster  many  traditional 
usages,  often  associated  with  religion.  Thus  even  the 
most  natural  and  most  directly  biological  tie,  that 
between  mother  and  child,  has  its  social  as  well  as 
its  physiological  determination,  and  cannot  be 
described  without  reference  to  the  influence  exercised 
by  the  tradition  and  usage  of  the  community. 

Let  us  briefly  summarize  and  characterize  these 
social  co-determinants  of  motherhood  in  our  own 
society.  Maternity  is  a  moral,  reUgious  and  even 
artistic  ideal  of  civilization,  a  pregnant  woman  is 
protected  by  law  and  custom,  and  should  be  regarded 
as  a  sacred  object,  while  she  herself  ought  to  feel  proud 
and  happy  in  her  condition.  That  this  is  an  ideal 
which  can  be  reaUzed  is  vouched  for  by  historical 
and  ethnographical  data.  Even  in  modem  Europe, 
the  orthodox  Jewish  communities  of  Poland  keep 
it   up  in   practice,   and   amongst   them   a   pregnant 


20  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

woman  is  an  object  of  real  veneration,  and  feels 
proud  of  her  condition.  In  the  Christian  Aryan 
societies,  however,  pregnancy  among  the  lower  classes 
is  made  a  burden,  and  regarded  as  a  nuisance ; 
among  the  well-to-do  people  it  is  a  source  of 
embarrassment,  discomfort,  and  temporary  ostracism 
from  ordinary  social  life.  Since  we  thus  have  to 
recognize  the  importance  of  the  mother's  pre-natal 
attitude  for  her  future  sentiment  towards  her  offspring, 
and  since  this  attitude  varies  greatly  with  the  milieu 
and  depends  on  social  values,  it  is  important  that  this 
sociological  problem  should  be  studied  more  closely. 

At  birth,  the  biological  patterns  and  the 
instinctive  impulses  of  the  mother  are  endorsed  and 
strengthened  by  society,  which,  in  many  of  its 
customs,  moral  rules  and  ideals,  makes  the  mother 
the  nurse  of  the  child,  and  this,  broadly  speaking, 
in  the  low  as  in  the  high  strata  of  almost  all  nations  of 
Europe.  Yet  even  here  in  a  relation  so  funda- 
mental, so  biologically  secured,  there  are  certain 
societies  where  custom  and  laxity  of  innate  im- 
pulses allow  of  notable  aberrations.  Thus  we  have 
the  system  of  sending  the  child  away  for  the  first 
year  or  so  of  its  life  to  a  hired  foster  mother,  a  custom 
once  highly  prevalent  in  the  middle  classes  of  France ; 
or  the  almost  equally  harmful  system  of  protecting 
the  woman's  breasts  by  hiring  a  foster  mother,  or  by 
feeding  the  child  on  artificial  food,   a   custom   once 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      21 

prevalent  among  the  wealthy  classes,  though  to-day 
generally  stigmatized  as  unnatural.  Here  again  the 
sociologist  has  to  add  his  share  in  order  to  give  the 
true  picture  of  motherhood,  as  it  varies  according  to 
national,  economic  and  moral  differences. 

Let  us  now  turn  to  consider  the  same  relation 
in  a  matrilineal  society  on  the  shores  of  the  Pacific. 
The  Melanesiai;  woman  shows  invariably  a  passionate 
craving  for  her  child,  and  the  surrounding  society 
seconds  her  feelings,  fosters  her  incUnations  and  idealizes 
them  by  custom  and  usage.  From  the  first  moments 
of  pregnancy,  the  expectant  mother  is  made  to  watch 
over  the  welfare  of  her  future  offspring  by  keeping  a 
number  of  food  taboos  and  other  observances.  The 
pregnant  woman  is  regarded  by  custom  as  an  object  of 
reverence,  an  ideal  which  is  fully  realized  by  the 
actual  behaviour  and  feelings  of  these  natives.  There 
exists  an  elaborate  ceremony  performed  at  the  first 
pregnancy,  with  an  intricate  and  somewhat  obscure 
aim,  but  emphasizing  the  importance  of  the  event 
and  conferring  on  the  pregnant  woman  distinction  and 
honour. 

After  the  birth,  mother  and  child  are  secluded  for 
about  a  month,  the  mother  constantly  tending  her 
child  and  nursing  it,  while  certain  female  relatives 
only  are  admitted  into  the  hut.  Adoption  under 
normal  circumstances  is  very  rare,  and  even  then  the 
child  is  usually  given  over  only  after  it  has  been 


22  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

weaned,  nor  is  it  ever  adopted  by  strangers,  but  by 
nearest  relatives  exclusively.  A  number  of  obser- 
vances, such  as  ritual  washing  of  mother  and 
child,  special  taboos  to  be  kept  by  the  mother,  and 
visits  of  presentation,  bind  mother  and  child  by  links 
of  custom  superimposed  upon  the  natural  ones.^ 

Thus  in  both  societies,  to  the  biological  adjustment 
of  instinct  there  are  added  the  social  forces  of  custom, 
morals  and  manners,  all  working  in  the  same  direction 
of  binding  mother  and  child  to  each  other,  of  giving 
them  full  scope  for  the  passionate  intimacy  of  mother- 
hood. This  harmony  between  social  and  biological 
forces  ensures  full  satisfaction  and  the  highest  bliss. 
Society  co-operates  with  nature  to  repeat  the  happy 
conditions  in  the  womb,  broken  by  the  trauma  of 
birth.  Dr.  Rank,  in  a  work  which  has  already 
proved  of  some  importance  for  the  development  of 
psycho-analysis, 2  has  indicated  the  significance  for 
later  Ufe  of  intra-uterine  existence  and  its  memories. 
Whatever  we  might  think  about  the  '  trauma  '  of  birth, 
there  is  no  doubt  that  the  first  months  after  birth 
reaUze,    by    the    working    of    both    biological    and 

^  An  important  form  of  the  taboo  observed  by  a  mother  after 
birth  is  the  sexual  abstinence  enjoined  upon  her.  For  a  beautiful 
expression  of  the  high  moral  view  of  natives  concerning  this  custom 
see  The  Contact  of  Races  and  Clash  of  Culture,  by  G.  Pitt-Rivers, 
1927,  chap,  viii,  sec.  3. 

*  Das  Trauma  der  Geburt  (1924).  Needless  to  say,  the  conclusions 
of  Dr.  Rank's  book  are  entirely  unacceptable  to  the  present  writer, 
who  is  not  able  to  adopt  any  of  the  recent  developments  of  psycho- 
analysis nor  even  to  understand  their  meaning. 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      23 

sociological  forces,  a  state  of  bliss  broken  by  the 
'  trauma  '  of  weaning.  The  exceptional  aberrations 
from  this  state  of  affairs  are  to  be  found  only  among 
the  higher  strata  of  civilized  communities. 

We  find  a  much  greater  difference  in  the  fatherhood 
of  the  patriarchal  and  matrilineal  family  at  this  period, 
and  it  is  rather  unexpected  to  find  that  in  a  savage 
society,  where  the  physical  bonds  of  paternity  are 
unknown,  and  where  mother  right  obtains,  the  father 
should  yet  stand  in  a  much  more  intimate  relation  to 
the  children  than  normally  happens  among  ourselves. 
For  in  our  own  society,  the  father  plays  a  very  small 
part  indeed  in  the  life  of  a  young  infant.  By  custom, 
usage,  and  manners,  the  well-to-do  father  is  kept  out 
of  the  nursery,  while  the  peasant  or  working  man 
has  to  leave  the  child  to  his  wife  for  the  greater  part 
of  the  twenty-four  hours.  He  may  perhaps  resent 
the  attention  which  the  infant  claims,  and  the  time 
which  it  takes  up,  but  as  a  rule  he  neither  helps  nor 
interferes  with  a  small  child. 

Among  the  Melanesians  '  fatherhood,'  as  we  know, is  a 
purely  social  relation .  Part  of  this  relation  consists  in  his 
duty  towards  his  wife's  children  ;  he  is  there  '  to  receive 
them  into  his  arms  ',  a  phrase  we  have  already  quoted  ; 
he  has  to  carry  them  about  when  on  the  march  the 
mother  is  tired,  and  he  has  to  assist  in  the  nursing  at 
home.  He  tends  them  in  their  natural  needs,  and  cleanses 
them,  and  there  are  many  stereotyped  expressions 


24  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

in  the  native  language  referring  to  fatherhood  and 
its  hardships,  and  to  the  duty  of  fiUal  gratitude  towards 
him.  A  typical  Trobriand  father  is  a  hard-working 
and  conscientious  nurse  and  in  this  he  obeys  the  call 
of  duty,  expressed  in  social  tradition.  The  fact  is, 
however,  that  the  father  is  always  interested  in  the 
children,  sometimes  passionately  so,  and  performs 
all  his  duties  eagerly  and  fondly. 

Thus,  if  we  compare  the  patriarchal  and  the  matriUneal 
relation  at  this  early  stage,  we  see  that  the  main  point  of 
difference  lies  with  the  father.  In  our  society,  the  father 
is  kept  weU  out  of  the  picture,  and  has  at  best  a  subordi- 
nate part.  In  the  Trobriands,  he  plays  a  much  more 
active  role,  which  is  important  above  all  because  it 
gives  him  a  far  greater  scope  for  forming  ties  of  affection 
with  his  children.  In  both  societies  there  is 
found  with  a  few  exceptions,  little  room  for  conflict, 
between  the  biological  trend  and  the  social  conditions. 


IV 

FATHERHOOD  IN  MOTHER-RIGHT 

TX  7E  have  now  reached  the  period  when  the  child 
is  already  weaned,  when  it  is  learning  to  walk 
and  begins  to  speak.  Yet  biologically  it  is  but  slowly 
gaining  its  independence  from  the  mother's  body. 
It  clings  to  her  with  undiminished,  passionate  desire 
for  her  presence,  for  the  touch  of  her  body  and  the 
tender  clasp  of  hen  arms. 

This  is  the  natural,  biological  tendency,  but  in  our 
society,  at  one  stage  or  another,  the  child's  desires  are 
crossed  and  thwarted.  Let  us  first  realize  that  the  period 
upon  which  we  now  enter  is  introduced  by  the  process  of 
weaning.  By  this  the  blissful  harmony  of  infantile  life  is 
broken,  or  at  least  modified.  Among  the  higher  classes, 
weaning  is  so  prepared,  graduated  and  adjusted 
that  it  usually  passes  without  any  shock.  But  among 
women  of  the  lower  classes,  in  our  society,  weaning 
is  often  a  painful  wrench  for  the  mother  and  certainly 
for  the  child.  Later  on,  other  obstacles  tend  to 
obtrude  upon  the  intimacy  of  the  mother  with  the  child, 
in  whom  at  that  stage  a  notable  change  is  taking  place. 
He  becomes  independent  in  his  movements,  can  feed 
himself,  express  some  of  his  feelings  and  ideas,  and 

25 


26  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

begins  to  understand  and  to  observe.  In  the  higher 
classes,  the  nursery  arrangements  separate  the  mother 
from  the  child  in  a  gradual  manner.  This  dispenses 
with  any  shock,  but  it  leaves  a  gap  in  the  child's  life, 
a  yearning  and  an  unsatisfied  need.  In  the  lower 
classes,  where  the  child  shares  the  parents'  bed,  it 
becomes  at  a  certain  time  a  source  of  embarrassment 
and  an  encumbrance,  and  suffers  a  rude  and  more 
brutal  repulsion. 

How  does  savage  motherhood  on  the  coral  islands 
of  New  Guinea  compare  at  this  stage  with  ours  ? 
First  of  all,  weaning  takes  place  much  later  in  life, 
at  a  time  when  the  child  is  already  independent,  can 
run  about,  eat  practically  everjrthing  and  foUow 
other  interests.  It  takes  place,  that  is,  at  a  moment 
when  the  child  neither  wants  nor  needs  the  mother's 
breast  any  more,  so  that  the  first  wrench  is  eliminated. 

'  Matriarchate,'  the  rule  of  the  mother,  does  not  in 
any  way  entail  a  stem,  terrible  mother-virago.  The 
Trobriand  mother  carries  her  children,  fondles  them, 
and  plays  with  them  at  this  stage  quite  as  lovingly 
as  at  the  earlier  period,  and  custom  as  well  as  morals 
expects  it  from  her.  The  child  is  bound  to  her,  also, 
according  to  law,  custom  and  usage,  by  a  closer  tie 
than  is  her  husband,  whose  rights  are  subservient 
to  those  of  the  offspring.  The  psychology  of  the 
intimate  marital  relations  has  therefore  a  different 
character,  and  the  repulsion  of  the  child  from  the 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      27 

mother  by  the  father  is  certainly  not  a  typical 
occurrence,  if  it  ever  occurs  at  all.  Another  difference 
between  the  Melanesian  and  the  typical  European 
mother  is  that  the  former  is  much  more  indulgent. 
Since  there  is  little  training  of  the  child,  and  hardly 
any  moral  education ;  since  what  there  is  begins 
later  and  is  done  by  other  people,  there  is  scarcely 
room  for  severity.  This  absence  of  maternal  discipUne 
precludes  on  the  one  hand  such  aberrations  of  severity 
as  are  sometimes  found  among  us  ;  on  the  other  hand, 
however,  it  lessens  the  feeling  of  interest  on  the  part 
of  the  child,  the  desire  to  please  the  mother, 
and  to  win  her  approval.  This  desire,  it  must  be 
remembered,  is  one  of  the  strong  Unks  of  filial 
attachment  among  us,  and  one  which  holds  great 
possibilities  for  the  establishment  of  a  permanent 
relation  in  later  life. 

Turning  now  to  the  paternal  relation  we  see  that,  in 
our  society,  irrespective  of  nationality  or  social  class, 
the  father  still  enjoys  the  patriarchal  status.^  He 
is  the  head  of  the  family  and  the  relevant  link  in 
the  lineage,  and  he  is  also  the  economic  provider. 

^  Here  again  I  should  like  to  make  an  exception  with  regard 
to  the  modern  American  and  British  family.  The  father  is  in 
process  of  losing  his  patriarchal  position.  As  conditions  are  in 
flux,  however,  it  is  not  safe  to  take  them  into  consideration  here. 
Psycho-analysis  cannot  hope,  I  think,  to  preserve  its  "  Oedipus 
complex  "  for  future  generations,  who  will  only  know  a  weak  and 
henpecked  father.  For  him  the  children  will  feel  indulgent  pity 
rather  than  hatred  and  fear  ! 


28  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

As  an  absolute  ruler  of  the  family,  he  is  liable  to 
become  a  tyrant,  in  which  case  frictions  of  all  sorts 
arise  between  him  and  his  wife  and  children.  The 
details  of  these  depend  greatly  on  the  social  milieu. 
In  the  wealthy  classes  of  Western  civilization,  the 
child  is  well  separated  from  his  father  by  all  sorts 
of  nursery  arrangements.  Although  constantly  with 
the  nurse,  the  child  is  usually  attended  to  and  controlled 
by  the  mother,  who,  in  such  cases,  almost  invariably 
takes  the  dominant  place  in  the  child's  affections. 
The  father,  on  the  other  hand,  is  seldom  brought  within 
the  child's  horizon,  and  then  only  as  an  onlooker 
and  stranger,  before  whom  the  children  have  to 
behave  themselves,  show  off  and  perform.  He  is  the 
source  of  authority,  the  origin  of  punishment,  and 
therefore  becomes  a  bogey.  Usually  the  result  is 
a  mixture  ;  he  is  the  perfect  being  for  whose  benefit 
everything  has  to  be  done  ;  and,  at  the  same  time, 
he  is  the  '  ogre '  whom  the  child  has  to  fear  and 
for  whose  comfort,  as  the  child  soon  reaUzes,  the  house- 
hold is  arranged.  The  loving  and  sympathetic  father 
will  easily  assume  the  former  role  of  a  demi-god.  The 
pompous,  wooden,  or  tactless  one  will  soon  earn  the 
suspicion  and  even  hate  of  the  nursery.  In  relation 
to  the  father,  the  mother  becomes  an  intermediary 
who  is  sometimes  ready  to  denounce  the  child  to 
the  higher  authority,  but  who  at  the  same  time  can 
intercede  against  punishment. 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      29 

The  picture  is  different,  though  the  results  are  not 
dissimilar,  in  the  one-room  and  one-bed  households 
of  the  poor  peasantry  of  Central  and  Eastern  Europe, 
or  of  the  lower  working  classes.  The  father  is  brought 
into  closer  contact  with  the  child,  which  in  rare 
circumstances  allows  of  a  greater  affection,  but  usually 
gives  rise  to  much  more  acute  and  chronic  friction. 
When  a  father  returns  home  tired  from  work,  or  drunk 
from  the  inn,  he  naturally  vents  his  ill-temper  on  the 
family,  and  bullies  mother  and  children.  There  is  no 
village,  no  poor  quarter  in  a  modem  town,  where 
cases  could  not  be  found  of  sheer,  patriarchal  cruelty. 
From  my  own  memory,  I  could  quote  numerous 
cases  where  peasant  fathers  would,  on  returning  home 
drunk,  beat  the  children  for  sheer  pleasure,  or  drag 
them  out  of  bed  and  send  them  into  the  cold  night. 

Even  at  best,  when  the  working  father  returns 
home,  the  children  have  to  keep  quiet,  stop  rowdy 
games  and  repress  spontaneous,  childish  outbursts 
of  joy  and  sorrow.  The  father  is  a  supreme  source 
of  punishment  in  poor  households  also,  while  the 
mother  acts  as  intercessor,  and  often  shares  in  the 
treatment  meted  out  to  the  children.  In  the  poorer 
households,  moreover,  the  economic  role  of  provider 
and  the  social  power  of  the  father  are  more  quickly 
and  definitely  recognized,  and  act  in  the  same  direction 
as  his  personal  influence. 

The  role  of  the  Melanesian  father  at  this  stage  is 


30  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

very  different  from  that  of  the  European  patriarch. 
I  have  briefly  sketched  in  Chapter  IV  his  very  different 
social  position  as  husband  and  father,  and  the  part  he 
plays  in  the  household.  He  is  not  the  head  of  the 
family,  he  does  not  transmit  his  lineage  to  his  children, 
nor  is  he  the  main  provider  of  food.  This  entirely 
changes  his  legal  rights  and  his  personal  attitude  to 
his  wife.  A  Trobriand  man  will  seldom  quarrel  with 
his  wife,  hardly  ever  attempt  to  brutalize  her,  and  he 
will  never  be  able  to  exercise  a  permanent  tyranny. 
Even  sexual  co-habitation  is  not  regarded  by  native 
law  and  usage  as  the  wife's  duty  and  the  husband's 
privilege,  as  is  the  case  in  our  society.  The  Trobriand 
natives  take  the  view,  dictated  by  tradition,  that 
the  husband  is  indebted  to  his  wife  for  sexual  services, 
that  he  has  to  deserve  them  and  pay  for  them.  One 
of  the  ways,  the  chief  way,  in  fact,  of  acquitting 
himself  of  this  duty  is  by  performing  services  for  her 
children  and  showing  affection  to  them.  There  are 
many  native  sayings  which  embody  in  a  sort  of  loose 
folk-lore  these  principles.  In  the  child's  infancy 
the  husband  has  been  the  nurse,  tender  and  loving  ; 
later  on  in  early  childhood  he  plays  with  it,  carries  it, 
and  teaches  it  such  amusing  sports  and  occupations 
as  take  its  fancy. 

Thus  the  legal,  moral  and  customary  tradition 
of  the  tribe  and  all  the  forces  of  organization  combine 
to  give  the  man,  in  his  conjugal  and  paternal  rdle. 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      31 

an  entirely  different  attitude  from  that  of  a  patriarch. 
And  though  it  has  to  be  defined  in  an  abstract  manner, 
this  is  by  no  means  a  mere  legal  principle,  detached 
from  life.  It  expresses  itself  in  every  detail  of  daily 
existence,  permeates  all  the  relations  within  the 
family,  and  dominates  the  sentiments  found  there. 
The  children  never  see  their  mother  subjugated  or 
brutalized  or  in  abject  dependence  upon  her  husband, 
not  even  when  she  is  a  commoner  married  to  a  chief. 
They  never  feel  his  heavy  hand  on  themselves  ;  he 
is  not  their  kinsman,  nor  their  owner,  nor  their 
benefactor.  He  has  no  rights  or  prerogatives.  Yet 
he  feels,  as  does  every  normal  father  all  over  the 
world,  a  strong  affection  for  them  ;  and  this,  together 
with  his  traditional  duties,  makes  him  try  to  win  their 
love,  and  thus  to  retain  his  influence  over  them. 

Comparing  European  with  Melanesian  paternity,  it 
is  important  to  keep  in  mind  the  biological  facts  as 
well  as  the  sociological.  Biologically  there  is 
undoubtedly  in  the  average  man  a  tendency  towards 
affectionate  and  tender  feelings  for  his  children. 
But  this  tendency  seems  not  to  be  strong  enough 
to  outweigh  the  many  hardships  which  children 
entail  on  a  parent.  When,  therefore,  society  steps 
in  and  in  one  case  declares  that  the  father  is  the 
absolute  master,  and  that  the  children  should  be  there 
for  his  benefit,  pleasure  and  glory,  this  social  influence 
tilts   the    balance   against    a    happy   equilibrium    of 


32  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

natural  affection  and  natural  impatience  of  the 
nuisance.  When,  on  the  other  hand,  a  matrilineal 
society  grants  the  father  no  privileges  and  no  right 
to  his  children's  affections,  then  he  must  earn  them, 
and  when  again,  in  the  same  uncivilized  society, 
there  are  fewer  strains  on  his  nerves  and  his  ambitions 
and  his  economic  responsibilities,  he  is  freer  to  give 
himself  up  to  his  paternal  instincts.  Thus  in  our 
society  the  adjustment  between  biological  and  social 
forces,  which  was  satisfactory  in  earliest  childhood, 
begins  to  show  a  lack  of  harmony  later  on.  In  the 
Melanesian  society,  the  harmonious  relations  persist. 

Father -right,  we  have  seen,  is  to  a  great  extent 
a  source  of  family  conflict,  in  that  it  grants  to 
the  father  social  claims  and  prerogatives  not  com- 
mensurate with  his  biological  propensities,  nor  with  the 
personal  affection  which  he  can  feel  for  and  arouse 
in  his  children. 


INFANTILE    SEXUALITY 

T^RAVERSING  the  same  ground  as  Freud  and  the 
psycho-analysts,  I  have  yet  tried  to  keep  clear 
of  the  subject  of  sex,  partly  in  order  to  emphasize 
the  sociological  aspect  in  my  account,  partly  in  order 
to  avoid  moot  theoretical  distinctions  as  to  the  nature 
of  mother-and-child  attachment  or  the '  libido ' .  But  at 
this  stage,  as  the  children  begin  to  play  independently 
and  develop  an  interest  in  the  surrounding  work  and 
people,  sexuality  makes  its  first  appearance  in  forms 
accessible  to  outside  sociological  observation  and 
directly  affecting  family  life.^  A  careful  observer  of 
European  children,  and  one  who  has^not  forgotten  his 
own  childhood,  has  to  recognize  that  at  an  early  age, 
say,  between  three  and  four,  there  arises  in  them 
a  special  sort  of  interest  and  curiosity.  Besides  the 
world  of  lawful,  normal  and  '  nice  '  things,  there  opens 

^  The  reader  who  is  interested  in  infantile  sexuality  and  child 
psychology  should  also  consult  A.  Moll,  Das  Sexualleben  des  Kindes 
(1908)  ;  Havelock  Ellis's  Studies  in  the  Psychology  of  Sex  (1919  ed., 
pp.  13  seqq.,  also  vol.  i,  1910  ed.,  pp.  36  seqq.  and  235  seqq.  and 
passim).  The  books  of  Ploss-Renz,  Das  Kind  in  Brauch  und  Sitte 
der  Volker  (Leipzig,  1911-12);  Charlotte  Biihler,  Das  Seelenleben 
des  Jugendlichen  (1925) ;  and  the  works  of  William  Stern  on  Child 
Psychology  are  also  important. 

33  D 


34  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

up  a  world  of  shame-faced  desires,  clandestine  interests 
and  subterranean  impulses.  The  two  categories  of 
things,  '  decent '  and  '  indecent ',  '  pure  '  and  '  impure  ', 
begin  to  crystallize,  categories  destined  to  remain 
throughout  life.  In  some  people  the  '  indecent  ' 
becomes  completely  suppressed,  and  the  right  values  of 
decency  become  hypertrophied  into  the  virulent 
virtue  of  the  puritan,  or  the  still  more  repulsive 
hypocrisy  of  the  conventionally  moral.  Or  the  '  decent ' 
is  altogether  smothered  through  glut  in  pornographic 
satisfaction,  and  the  other  category  develops  into 
a  complete  pruriency  of  mind,  not  less  repulsive 
than  hypocritical  '  virtue  '  itself. 

In  the  second  stage  of  childhood  which  we  are  now 
considering,  that  is  according  to  my  scheme  from 
an  age  of  about  four  to  six  years,  the  '  indecent ' 
centres  round  interests  in  excretory  functions, 
exhibitionism  and  games  witii  indecent  exposure, 
often  associated  with  cruelty.  It  hardly  differentiates 
between  the  sexes,  and  is  little  interested  in  the  act 
of  reproduction.  Anyone  who  has  lived  for  a  long 
time  among  peasants  and  knows  intimately  their  child- 
hood will  recognize  that  this  state  of  affairs  exists  as  a 
thing  normal,  though  not  open.  Among  the  working 
classes  things  seem  to  be  similar.*      Among  the  higher 

^  That  conscientious  sociologist,  Zola,  has  provided  us  with  rich 
material  on  the  subject,  entirely  in  agreement  with  my  own  observa- 
tions. 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      35 

classes  '  indecencies '  are  much  more  suppressed,  but 
not  very  different.  Observations  in  these  social  strata, 
which  would  be  more  difficult  than  among  peasants, 
should,  however,  be  urgently  carried  out  for  pedagogical, 
moral  and  eugenic  reasons,  and  suitable  methods 
of  research  devised.  The  results  would,  I  think, 
confirm  to  an  extraordinary  degree  some  of  the 
assertions  of  Freud  and  his  school.^ 

How  does  the  newly  awakened  infantile  sexuaUty 
or  infantile  indecency  influence  the  relation  to  the 
family  ?  In  the  division  between  things  '  decent ' 
and  '  indecent ',  the  parents,  and  especially  the  mother, 
are  included  wholly  within  the  first  category, 
and  remain  in  the  child's  mind  absolutely  untouched 
by  the  '  indecent.'  The  feeling  that  the  mother 
might  be  aware  of  any  prurient  infantile  play  is 
extremely  distasteful  to  the  child,  and  there  is  a  strong 
disinclination  to  allude  in  her  presence  or  to  speak 
with  her  about  any  sexual  matters.  The  father, 
who  is  also  kept  strictly  outside  the  '  indecent ' 
category,  is,  moreover,  regarded  as  the  moral  authority 
whom   these   thoughts   and   pastimes   would   offend. 


^  Freud's  contentions  of  the  normal  occurrence  of  premature 
sexuality,  of  little  differentiation  between  the  sexes,  of  anal-eroticism 
and  absence  of  genital  interest  are,  according  to  my  observations, 
correct.  In  a  recent  article  (Zeitschrift  ]ur  Psycho-Analyse,  1923), 
Freud  has  somewhat  modified  his  previous  view,  and  affirms,  without 
giving  arguments,  that  children  at  this  stage  have,  after  all,  already 
a  '  genital  '  interest.    With  this  I  cannot  agree. 


36  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

For  the  '  indecent '  always  carries  with  it  a  sense  of 
guilt.i 

Freud  and  the  psycho-analjrtic  school  have  laid  great 
stress  on  the  sexual  rivalry  between  mother  and 
daughter,  father  and  son  respectively.  My  own 
opinion  is  that  the  rivalry  between  mother  and 
daughter  does  not  begin  at  this  early  stage.  At  any 
rate,  I  have  never  observed  any  traces  of  it.  The 
relations  between  father  and  son  are  more  complex. 
Although,  as  I  have  said,  the  little  boy  has  no  thoughts, 
desires  or  impulses  towards  his  mother  which  he 
himself  would  feel  belong  to  the  category  of  the 
'indecent',  there  can  be  no  doubt  that  a  young 
organism  reacts  sexually  to  close  bodily  contact 
with  the   mother.  2    A  well-known    piece    of    advice 

^  The  attitude  of  the  modern  man  and  woman  is  rapidly  changing. 
At  present  we  studiously  '  enlighten  '  our  children,  and  keep  '  sex  ' 
neatly  prepared  for  them.  In  the  first  place,  however,  we  must 
remember  that  we  are  dealing  here  with  a  minority  even  among 
the  British  and  American  "  intelligentsia  ".  In  the  second  place, 
I  am  not  at  all  certain  whether  the  bashfulness  and  awkward  attitude 
of  children  towards  their  parents  in  matters  of  sex  will  be  to  any 
great  extent  overcome  by  this  method  of  treatment.  There  seems 
to  exist  a  general  tendency  even  among  adults  to  eliminate  the 
dramatic,  upsetting,  and  mysterious  emotional  elements  out  of  any 
stable  relationship  based  on  every-day  intercourse.  Even  among 
the  essentially  '  unrepressed  '  Trobrianders  the  parent  is  never 
the  confidant  in  matters  of  sex.  It  is  remarkable  how  much  easier 
it  is  to  make  any  delicate  or  shameful  confession  to  those  friends 
and  acquaintances  who  are  not  too  intimately  connected  with  our 
daily  hfe. 

*  Since  this  was  first  written  in  1921,  I  have  changed  my  views 
on  this  subject.  The  statement  that  'a  young  organism  reacts 
sexually  to  close  bodily  contact  with  the  mother  '  appears  to   me 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      37 

given  by  old  gossips  to  young  mothers  in  peasant 
communities  is  to  the  effect  that  boys  above  the  age 
of  three  should  sleep  separately  from  the  mother. 
The  occurrence  of  infantile  erections  is  well  known 
in  these  communities,  as  is  also  the  fact  that  the  boy 
clings  to  the  mother  in  a  different  way  from  the  girl. 
That  the  father  and  the  young  male  child  have  a 
component  of  sexual  rivalry  under  such  conditions 
seems  probable,  even  to  an  outside  sociological  observer. 
The  psycho-analysts  maintain  it  categorically.  Among 
the  wealthier  classes  crude  conflicts  arise  more  seldom, 
if  ever,  but  they  arise  in  imagination  and  in  a  more 
refined  though  perhaps  not  less  insidious  form. 

It  must  be  noted  that  at  this  stage  when  the  child 
begins  to  show  a  different  character  and  temperament 
according  to  sex,  the  parents'  feelings  are  differentiated 
between  sons  and  daughters.  The  father  sees  in  the 
son  his  successor,  the  one  who  is  to  replace  him  in 
the  family  lineage  and  in  the  household.  He  becomes 
therefore  all  the  more  critical,  and  this  influences  his 
feelings  in  two  directions  :  if  the  boy  shows  signs 
of  mental  or  physical  deficiency,  if  he  is  not  up  to  the 
type  of  the  ideal  in  which  the  father  believes,  he  will 
be  a  source  of  bitter  disappointment  and  hostility. 
On  the  other    hand,   even   at  this  stage,   a  certain 

now  absurd.  I  am  glad  I  may  use  this  strong  word,  having  written 
the  absurd  statement  myself.  I  have  set  forth  what  appears  to  me 
the  adequate  analysis  of  this  phase  in  infantile  psychology  later 
on,  Part  IV,  Chapter  IX. 


38  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

amount  of  rivalry,  the  resentment  of  future  super- 
session, and  the  melancholy  of  the  waning  generation 
lead  again  to  hostility.  Repressed  in  both  cases,  this 
hostility  hardens  the  father  against  the  son  and  provokes 
by  reaction  a  response  in  hostile  feelings.  The  mother, 
on  the  other  hand,  has  no  grounds  for  negative 
sentiments,  and  has  an  additional  admiration  for  the 
son  as  a  man  to  be.  The  father's  feeling  towards  the 
daughter — a  repetition  of  himself  in  a  feminine  form — 
hardly  fails  to  evoke  a  tender  emotion,  and  perhaps 
also  to  flatter  his  vanity.  Thus  social  factors  mix 
with  biological  and  make  the  father  cUng  more  tenderly 
to  the  daughter  than  to  the  son,  while  with  the  mother 
it  is  the  reverse.  But  it  must  be  noted  that  an 
attraction  to  the  offspring  of  the  other  sex,  because  it 
is  of  the  other  sex,  is  not  necessarily  sexual  attraction. 
In  Melanesia,  we  find  an  altogether  different  type 
of  sexual  development  in  the  child.  That  the  biological 
impulses  do  not  essentially  differ,  seems  beyond 
doubt.  But  I  have  failed  to  find  any  traces  of  what 
could  be  called  infantile  indecencies,  or  of  a 
subterranean  world  in  which  children  indulge 
in  clandestine  pastimes  centring  round  excretory 
functions  or  exhibitionism.  The  subject  naturally 
presents  certain  difficulties  of  observation,  for  it  is 
hard  to  enter  into  any  personal  communication  with 
a  savage  child,  and  if  there  were  a  world  of  indecent 
things  as  amongst  ourselves,  it  would  be  as  futile 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      39 

to  inquire  about  it  from  an  average  grown-up  native 
as  from  a  conventional  mother,  father,  or  nurse  in 
our  society.  But  there  is  one  circumstance  which 
makes  matters  so  entirely  different  among  these 
natives  that  there  is  no  danger  of  making  a  mistake  : 
this  is  that  with  them  there  is  no  repression,  no 
censure,  no  moral  reprobation  of  infantile  sexuality 
of  the  genital  type  when  it  comes  to  light  at  a  somewhat 
later  stage  than  the  one  we  are  now  considering — 
at  about  the  age  of  five  or  six.  So  if  there  were  any 
earlier  indecency,  this  could  be  as  easily  observed 
as  the  later  genital  stage  of  sexual  plays. 

How  can  we  then  explain  why  among  savages 
there  is  no  period  of  what  Freud  calls  '  pre-genital', 
'  anal-erotic  '  interest  ?  We  shall  be  able  to  understand 
this  better  when  we  discuss  the  sexuality  of  the 
next  stage  in  the  child's  development,  a  sexuality 
in  which  native  Melanesian  children  differ  essentially 
from  our  own. 


VI 

APPRENTICESHIP   TO    LIFE 

TX  7E  enter  now  on  the  third  stage  of  childhood, 
commencing  between  the  ages  of  five  and  seven. 
At  this  period  a  child  begins  to  feel  independent, 
to  create  its  own  games,  to  seek  for  associates  of  the 
same  age,  with  whom  it  has  a  tendency  to  roam  about 
unencumbered  by  grown-up  people.  This  is  the  time 
when  play  begins  to  pass  into  more  definite  occupa- 
tions and  serious  life  interests. 

Let  us  follow  our  parallel  at  this  stage.  In  Europe, 
entrance  into  school  or,  among  the  uneducated  classes, 
some  sort  of  preliminary  apprenticeship  to  an  economic 
occupation  removes  the  child  from  the  influence  of 
the  family.  The  boy  or  girl  lose  to  some  extent 
their  exclusive  attachment  to  the  mother.  With  the 
boy,  there  frequently  takes  place  at  this  period  a  trans- 
ference of  sentiment  to  a  substitute  mother,  who 
for  the  time  being  is  regarded  with  some  of  the 
passionate  tenderness  felt  for  the  mother,  but  with  no 
other  feelings.  Such  transference  must  not  be  con- 
fused with  the  much  later  tendency  of  adolescent 
boys  to  fall  in  love  with  women  older  than  themselves. 
At  the  same  time,  there  arises  a  desire  for  independence 

40 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      41 

from  the  all-possessive  intimacy  of  maternal  interest, 
which  makes  the  child  withhold  its  absolute  confidence 
from  the  parent.  Among  the  peasants  and  lower 
classes,  the  process  of  emancipation  from  the  mother 
takes  place  earlier  than  in  the  higher,  but  it  is 
similar  in  all  essentials.  When  the  mother  is  deeply 
attached  to  the  child,  especially  to  the  boy,  she  is 
apt  to  feel  a  certain  amount  of  jealousy  and  resentment 
at  this  emancipation  and  to  put  obstacles  in  its 
way.  This  usually  makes  the  wrench  only  more 
painful  and  violent. 

The  children  on  the  coral  beaches  of  the  Western 
Pacific  show  a  similar  tendency.  This  appears  there 
even  more  clearly,  for  the  absence  of  compulsory 
education  and  of  any  strict  discipline  at  this  age 
allows  a  much  freer  play  to  the  natural  inclinations 
of  infantile  nature.  On  the  part  of  the  mother  there 
is  in  Melanesia,  however,  no  jealous  resentment 
or  anxiety  at  the  child's  new-found  independence, 
and  here  we  see  the  influence  of  the  lack  of  any  deep, 
educational  interest  between  mother  and  child.  At 
this  stage,  the  children  in  the  Trobriand  archipelago 
begin  to  form  a  small  juvenile  community  within 
the  community.  They  roam  about  in  bands,  play  on 
distant  beaches  or  in  secluded  parts  of  the  jungle, 
join  with  other  small  communities  of  children  from 
neighbouring  villages,  and  in  all  this,  though  they 
obey  the  commands  of  their  child-leaders,  they  are 


42  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

almost  completely  independent  of  the  elders' 
authority.  The  parents  never  try  to  keep  them  back, 
to  interfere  with  them  in  any  way  or  to  bind  them 
to  any  routine.  At  first,  of  course,  the  family  still 
retains  a  considerable  hold  over  the  child,  but  the 
process  of  emancipation  progresses  gradually  and 
constantly  in  an  untrammelled,  natural  manner. 

In  this  there  is  a  great  difference  between  European 
conditions,  where  the  child  often  passes  from  the 
intimacy  of  the  family  to  the  cold  discipline  of  the 
school  or  other  preliminary  training,  and  the  Melanesian 
state  of  affairs  where  the  process  of  emancipation 
is  gradual,  free  and  pleasailt. 

And  now  what  about  the  father  at  this  stage  ? 
In  our  society — here  again  excluding  certain  modern 
phases  of  family  life  in  Britain  and  America — 
he  still  represents  the  principle  of  authority  within 
the  family.  Outside,  at  school,  in  the  workshop, 
at  the  preliminary  manual  labour  which  the  child 
of  peasants  is  often  set  to  do,  it  is  either  the 
father  in  person  or  his  substitute  who  wields  the 
power.  In  the  higher  classes  at  this  stage,  the 
very  important  process  of  conscious  formation  of 
paternal  authority  and  of  the  father  ideal  takes 
place.  The  child  begins  now  to  comprehend 
what  it  had  guessed  and  felt  before  —  the 
father's  established  authority  as  the  head  of  the 
family,  and  his  economic  influence.     The  ideal  of  his 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      43 

infallibility,  wisdom,  justice,  and  might  is  usually 
in  varying  degrees  and  in  different  ways  inculcated 
in  the  child  by  the  mother  or  the  nurse  in  reUgious 
and  moral  teaching.  Now  the  role  of  an  ideal  is  never 
an  easy  one,  and  to  maintain  it  in  the  intimacy  of 
daily  life  is  a  very  difficult  performance  indeed, 
especially  for  one  whose  bad  tempers  and  follies  are 
not  repressed  by  any  discipline.  Thus  no  sooner  is 
the  father  ideal  formed  than  it  begins  to  decompose. 
The  child  feels  at  first  only  a  vague  malaise  at  his 
father's  bad  temper  or  weakness,  a  fear  of  his  wrath, 
a  dim  feeling  of  injustice,  perhaps  some  shame  when 
the  father  has  a  really  bad  outburst.  Soon  the  typical 
father-sentiment  is  formed,  full  of  contradictory 
emotions,  a  mixture  of  reverence,  contempt,  affection 
and  dislike,  tenderness  and  fear.  It  is  at  this  period 
of  childhood  that  the  social  influence  due  to  patriarchal 
institutions  makes  itself  felt  in  the  child's  attitude 
towards  the  male  parent.  Between  the  boy  and  his 
father  the  rivalries  of  successor  and  superseded,  and 
the  mutual  jealousies  described  in  the  previous  section, 
crystallize  more  distinctly  and  make  the  negative 
elements  of  the  father-to-son  relation  more  pre- 
dominant than  in  the  case  of  father-to-daughter. 

Among  the  lower  classes,  the  process  of  the  idealiza- 
tion of  the  father  is  cruder  but  not  less  important. 
As  I  have  already  said,  the  father  in  a  typical  peasant 
household  is  openly  a  tyrant.     The  mother  acquiesces 


44  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

in  his  supremacy  and  imparts  the  attitude  to  her 
children,  who  reverence  and  at  the  same  time  fear 
the  strong  and  brutal  force  embodied  in  their  father. 
Here  also  a  sentiment  composed  of  ambivalent  emotion 
is  formed,  with  a  distinct  preference  of  the  father 
for  his  female  children. 

What  is  the  father's  role  in  Melanesia  ?  Little  need 
be  said  about  it  at  this  stage.  He  continues  to 
befriend  the  children,  to  help  them,  to  teach  them 
what  they  like  and  as  much  as  they  like.  Children, 
it  is  true,  are  less  interested  in  him  at  this  stage  and 
prefer,  on  the  whole,  their  small  comrades.  But  the 
father  is  always  there  as  a  helpful  adviser,  half  play- 
mate, half  protector. 

Yet  at  this  period  the  principle  of  tribal  law  and 
authority,  the  submission  to  constraint  and  to  the 
prohibition  of  certain  desirable  things  enters  the  life 
of  a  young  girl  or  boy.  But  this  law  and  constraint 
are  represented  by  quite  another  person  than  the 
father,  by  the  mother's  brother,  the  male  head  of  the 
family  in  a  matriarchal  society.  He  it  is  who  actually 
wields  the  potestas  and  who  indeed  makes  ample 
use   of  it. 

His  authority,  though  closely  parallel  to  that  of 
the  father  among  ourselves,  is  not  exactly  identical 
with  it.  First  of  all  his  influence  is  introduced  into 
the  child's  life  much  later  than  that  of  the  European 
father.     Then  again,   he  never  enters  the  intimacy 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      45 

of  family  life,  but  lives  in  another  hut  and  often  in  a 
different  village,  for,  since  marriage  is  patrilocal  in  the 
Trobriands,  his  sister  and  her  children  have  their  abode 
in  the  village  of  the  husband  and  father.  Thus  his 
power  is  exercised  from  a  distance  and  it  cannot 
become  oppressive  in  those  small  matters  which  are 
most  irksome.  He  brings  into  the  life  of  the  child, 
whether  boy  or  girl,  two  elements  :  first  of  all,  that 
of  duty,  prohibition  and  constraint  :  secondly, 
especially  into  the  life  of  the  boy,  the  elements  of 
ambition,  pride  and  social  values,  half  of  that,  in  fact, 
which  makes  life  worth  living  for  the  Trobriander. 
The  constraint  comes  in,  in  so  far  as  he  begins 
to  direct  the  boy's  occupations,  to  require  certain  of 
his  services  and  to  teach  him  some  of  the  tribal  laws 
and  prohibitions.  Many  of  these  have  already  been 
inculcated  into  the  boy  by  the  parents,  but  the  kada 
(mother's  brother)  is  always  held  up  to  him  as  the 
real  authority  behind  the  rules. 

A  boy  of  six  will  be  solicited  by  his  mother's  brother 
to  come  on  an  expedition,  to  begin  some  work  in  the 
gardens,  to  assist  in  the  carrying  of  crops.  In  carrying 
out  these  activities,  in  his  maternal  uncle's  village 
and  together  with  other  members  of  his  clan,  the  boy 
learns  that  he  is  contributing  to  the  hutura  of  his 
clan  ;  he  begins  to  feel  that  this  is  his  own  village 
and  own  people  ;  to  learn  the  traditions,  myths  and 
legends  of  his  clan.     The   child   at   this   stage   also 


46  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

frequently  co-operates  with  his  father,  and  it  is 
interesting  to  note  the  difference  in  the  attitude 
he  has  toward  the  two  elders.  The  father  still 
remains  his  intimate  ;  he  likes  to  work  with  him, 
assist  him  and  learn  from  him  ;  but  he  reahzes  more 
and  more  that  such  co-operation  is  based  on  goodwill 
and  not  on  law,  and  that  the  pleasure  derived  from  it 
must  be  its  own  reward,  but  that  the  glory  of  it  goes 
to  a  clan  of  strangers.  The  child  also  sees  his  mother 
receiving  orders  from  her  brother,  accepting  favours 
from  him,  treating  him  with  the  greatest  reverence, 
crouching  before  him  like  a  commoner  to  a  chief. 
He  gradually  begins  to  understand  that  he  is  his 
maternal  uncle's  successor,  and  that  he  will  also  be 
a  master  over  his  sisters,  from  whom  at  this  time  he 
is  already  separated  by  a  social  taboo  forbidding 
any  intimacy. 

The  maternal  uncle  is,  like  the  father  among  us, 
idealized  to  the  boy,  held  up  to  him  as  the  person 
who  should  be  pleased,  and  who  must  be  made  the 
model  to  be  imitated  in  the  future.  Thus  we  see  that 
most  of  the  elements,  though  not  all,  which  make 
the  father's  r61e  so  difficult  in  our  society,  are  vested 
among  the  Melanesians  in  the  mother's  brother. 
He  has  the  power,  he  is  idealized,  to  him  the  children 
and  the  mother  are  subjected,  while  the  father  is 
entirely  reUeved  of  all  these  odious  prerogatives  and 
characteristics.     But  the  mother's  brother  introduces 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      47 

the  child  to  certain  new  elements  which  make  life 
bigger,  more  interesting,  and  of  greater  appeal — 
social  ambition,  traditional  glory,  pride  in  his  lineage 
and  kinship,  promises  of  future  wealth,  power,  and 
social  status. 

It  must  be  realized  that  at  the  time  when  our 
European  child  starts  to  find  its  way  in  our 
complex  social  relations,  the  Melanesian  girl  or  boy 
also  begins  to  grasp  the  principle  of  kinship  which 
is  the  main  foundation  of  the  social  order.  These 
principles  cut  across  the  intimacy  of  family  life  and 
rearrange  for  the  child  the  social  world  which  up 
to  now  consisted  for  him  of  the  extended  circles 
of  family,  further  family,  neighbours  and  village 
community.  The  child  now  learns  that  he  has  to 
distinguish  above  and  across  these  groups  two  main 
categories.  The  one  consists  of  his  real  kinsmen, 
his  veyola.  To  these  belong  in  the  first  place  his 
mother,  his  brothers  and  sisters,  his  maternal 
uncle  and  all  their  kinsmen.  These  are  people  who 
are  of  the  same  substance  or  the  '  same  body  '  as 
himself.  The  men  he  has  to  obey,  to  co-operate 
with  and  to  assist  in  work,  war  and  personal  quarrels. 
The  women  of  his  clan  and  of  his  kinship  are  strictly 
tabooed  sexually  for  him.  The  other  social  category 
consists  of  the  stran^gers  or  '  outsiders ',  tomakava. 
By  this  name  are  called  all  those  people  who  are  not 
related  by  matrilineal  ties,  or  who  do  not  belong  to 


48  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

the  same  clan.  But  this  group  comprises  also  the 
father  and  his  relations,  male  and  female,  and  the 
women  whom  he  may  marry  or  with  whom  he  may 
have  love  affairs.  Now  these  people,  and  especially 
the  father,  stand  to  him  in  a  very  close  personal 
relation  which,  however,  is  entirely  ignored  by  law 
and  moraUty.  Thus  we  have  on  the  one  side  the 
consciousness  of  identity  and  kinship  associated  with 
social  ambitions  and  pride,  but  also  with  constraint 
and  sexual  prohibition  ;  and  on  the  other,  in  the 
relation  to  the  father  and  his  relatives,  free  friendship 
and  natural  sentiment  as  well  as  sexual  liberty,  but 
no  personal  identity  or  traditional  bonds. 


VII 
THE     SEXUALITY     OF     LATER     CHILDHOOD 

TT  TE  pass  now  to  the  problem  of  sexual  life  in  the 
third  period — the  later  childhood,  as  we  might 
call  it,  covering  the  stage  of  free  play  and  movement, 
which  lasts  from  about  five  or  six  till  puberty.  I 
kept  the  discussion  of  sex  separate  from  that  of  the 
social  influences  when  dealing  with  the  previous 
period  of  child  life,  and  I  shall  do  the  same  here,  so 
as  to  bring  out  clearly  the  respective  contributions 
of  organism  and  society. 

In  modern  Europe,  according  to  Freud,  there  sets 
in  at  this  age  a  very  curious  phenomenon :  the 
regression  of  sexuaUty,  a  period  of  latency,  a  lull 
in  the  development  of  sexual  functions  and  impulses. 
What  makes  this  latency  period  especially  important 
in  the  Freudian  scheme  of  neuroses  is  the  amnesia 
which  is  associated  with  it,  the  curtain  of  complete 
oblivion  which  falls  at  this  period  and  which  obliterates 
the  reminiscences  of  infantile  sexuahty.  Remarkably 
enough,  this  important  and  interesting  contention 
of  Freud's  is  not  endorsed  by  other  students.  For 
instance,  Moll,  in  his  memoir  on  infantile  sexuality 

49  B 


50  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

(a  very  thorough  and  competent  contribution)/  makes 
no  mention  of  any  lull  in  sexual  development.  On  the 
contrary,  his  account  implies  a  steady  and  gradual 
increase  of  sexuality  in  the  child,  the  curve  rising 
in  a  continuous  manner  without  any  kink.  It  is 
remarkable  to  'find  that  Freud  himself  at  times  appears 
to  vacillate.  Thus  of  all  the  periods  of  childhood 
this  one  has  no  clear  and  explicit  chapter  devoted 
to  it  and  in  one  or  two  places  Freud  even  withdraws 
his  contention  about  its  existence.^  Yet,  if  I  may 
affirm  on  the  basis  of  material  derived  from  personal 
knowledge  of  well-educated  schoolboys,  the  latency 
period  invariably  sets  in  at  about  the  sixth  year 
and  lasts  from  two  to  four  years.  During  this  time 
interest  in  indecencies  flags,  the  lurid  yet  alluring 
colours  which  they  had  fade  away,  and  they  are 
repressed  and  forgotten  while  new  things  arise  to 
take  up  the  interest  and  energy. 

How  are  we  to  explain  the  divergency  in  Freud's 
own  views  as  weU  as  the  ignoring  of  the  facts  by  other 
students  of  sex  ? 

It   is   clear   that    we    do    not    deal   here   with    a 


*  A.  Moll,  Das  Sexualleben  des  Kindes,  1908. 

•  The  latency  period  is  frequently  mentioned,  for  instance,  in 
Drei  Abhandlungen,  5th  edition,  pp.  40,  44,  64  ;  Vorlesungen,  1922, 
p.  374.  But  there  is  no  special  treatment  of  it  in  any  of  these  books. 
Again,  we  read,  "  Die  Latenzzeit  kann  auch  entfallen.  Sie  braucht 
keine  Unterbrechung  der  Sexualbetatigung,  der  Sexualinteressen 
mit  sich  zu  bringen,"  Vorlesungen,  loc.  cit. 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      51 

phenomenon  deeply  rooted  in  man's  organic  nature, 
but  with  one  largely  if  not  wholly  determined  by 
social  factors.  If  we  turn  to  a  comparative  survey 
of  the  various  layers  of  society,  we  perceive  without 
difficulty  that  among  the  lower  classes,  especially 
among  peasants,  the  latency  period  is  much  less 
pronounced.  In  order  to  see  matters  clearly,  let  us 
cast  back  to  the  previous  period  of  infantile  pre- 
genital  sexuaUty  and  see  how  the  two  link  up.  We 
saw  in  Chapter  V  that  in  the  lower  as  well  as  in  the 
higher  strata  there  exists  at  an  early  age  this  strong 
interest  in  the  'indecent'.  Among  peasant  children, 
however,  it  appears  somewhat  later  and  has  a  shghtly 
different  character.  Let  us  compare  once  more  the 
sources  of  'anal-eroticism',  as  it  is  called  by  Freud, 
among  the  children  of  the  lower  and  higher  classes.^ 
In  the  nursery  of  the  weU-to-do  baby,  the  natural 
functions,  the  interest  in  excretion,  are  at  first 
encouraged,  and  then  suddenly  stopped.  The  nurse 
or  mother,  who  up  to  a  certain  point  tries  to  stimulate 
the  performance,  praises  the  prompt  execution  and 
shows  the  results,  discovers  at  a  certain  moment  that 
the  child  takes  too  much  interest  in  it  and  begins 
to  play  in  a  manner  that  to  the  grown-up  appears 
unclean,  though  to  the  child  it  is  perfectly  natural. 

^  I  would  not  now  use  the  ugly  neologism  '  anal-eroticism  ', 
but  as  long  as  a  term  is  defined  there  is  no  harm  in  borrowing  it 
from  a  dctrine  which  is  being  discussed. 


52  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

Then  the  nursery  authority  steps  in,  slaps  the  child, 
makes  it  an  offence,  and  the  interest  is  violently 
repressed.  The  child  grows  up,  the  reticences,  frowns, 
and  artificialities  begin  to  surround  the  natural 
functions  with  clandestine  interest  and  mysterious 
attraction. 

Those  who  remember  from  their  own  childhood 
how  strongly  such  a  repressive  atmosphere  of 
hints  and  sous-entendus  is  felt  and  how  well  its 
meaning  is  understood  by  the  child,  recognize  that 
the  category  of  '  indecent '  is  created  by  elders. 
From  observations  of  children,  moreover,  as  well 
as  from  memory,  it  is  easy  to  ascertain  how  quickly 
and  how  soon  the  children  catch  up  artificial  attitudes 
of  elders,  becoming  little  prigs,  moralists,  and  snobs. 
Among  peasants,  conditions  are  quite  different.  The 
children  are  instructed  in  sexual  matters  at  an  early 
age  :  they  cannot  help  seeing  sexual  performances 
of  their  parents  and  other  relatives  ;  they  listen  to 
quarrels  in  which  whole  lists  of  sexual  obscenities 
and  technicalities  are  recited.  They  have  to  deal  with 
domestic  animals,  whose  propagation  in  all  its  details 
is  a  matter  of  great  concern  to  the  whole  household 
and  is  freely  and  minutely  discussed.  Since  they 
are  deeply  steeped  in  things  natural,  they  feel  less 
incUned  to  amuse  themselves  by  doing  in  a  clandestine 
manner  that  which  in  many  ways  they  can  do  and 
enjoy  openly.     The  children  of  the  working  classes 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      53 

stand  perhaps  midway  between  the  two  extremes. 
Hardly  in  contact  with  animals,  they  receive,  on  the 
other  hand,  an  even  greater  amount  of  bedroom 
demonstration  and  public-house  instruction. 

What  is  the  result  of  these  essential  differences 
between  well-to-do  and  proletarian  children  ?  First 
of  all,  the  '  indecency '  which  among  bourgeois  children 
is  fostered  by  the  repression  of  the  natural  curiosities  is 
much  less  pronounced  in  the  lower  classes,  and  comes 
up  only  later  where  indecency  is  already  associated 
with  ideas  of  genital  sexuality.  In  the  higher  classes, 
when  the  curiosity  about  indecencies  has  played 
itself  out,  and  with  the  leaving  of  the  nursery  new 
interests  in  life  crop  up,  the  period  of  latency  now 
sets  in  and  these  new  interests  absorb  the  child, 
while  the  absence  of  knowledge  which  is  usual  among 
children  of  the  educated  prevents  the  genital  interest 
setting  in  so  early. 

In  the  lower  classes  this  knowledge  and  early 
curiosity  in  genital  matters  are  present  at  the  same 
time  and  establish  a  continuity,  a  steady  development 
from  the  early  period  to  that  of  full  sexual  puberty. 

The  nature  of  social  influences  collaborates  with  these 
facts  to  produce  a  much  greater  breach  of  continuity 
in  the  life  of  a  well-to-do  child.  While  his  whole 
life  up  to  the  age  of  six  v;as  devoted  to  amusement, 
he  has  now  suddenly  to  learn  and  to  do  school-work. 
The  peasant  child  had  already  previously  been  helping 


54  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

with  the  cooking  or  looking  after  the  younger  children, 
or  running  after  the  geese  and  sheep.  At  this  time, 
there  is  no  breach  of  continuity  in  his  Ufe. 

Thus,  while  the  early  childish  interest  in  the  indecent 
awakens  earUer  and  in  another  form  in  the  peasant 
and  proletarian  child,  it  is  less  clandestine,  less 
associated  with  guilt,  hence  less  immoral,  less  *  anal- 
erotic  '  and  more  attached  to  sex.  It  passes  more 
easily  and  with  more  continuity  into  early  sexual 
play,  and  the  period  of  latency  is  almost  completely 
absent  or,  at  any  rate,  much  less  pronounced.  This 
explains  why  psycho-analysis,  which  deals  with  neurotic 
well-to-do  people,  has  led  to  the  discovery  of  this  period, 
while  the  general  medical  observations  of  Dr.  Moll  did 
not  detect  it. 

But  if  there  could  be  any  doubt  about  the  facts 
of  this  difference  between  the  classes  and  about  its 
cause,  such  doubt  should  disappear  when  we  turn 
to  Melanesia.  Here  certainly  the  facts  are  different 
from  those  found  among  our  educated  classes.  As 
we  saw  in  Chapter  V,  the  early  sexual  indecencies, 
clandestine  games  and  interests  are  absent.  In  fact, 
it  might  be  said  that  for  these  children  the  categories 
of  decent-indecent,  pure-impure,  do  not  exist.  The 
same  reasons  which  make  this  distinction  weaker 
and  less  important  among  our  peasants  than  among 
our  bourgeois  act  even  more  strongly  and  directly 
among  the   Melanesians.     In   Melanesia  there  is  no 


THE  FORMATION  OF  A  COMPLEX   55 

taboo  on  sex  in  general ;  there  is  no  putting  of  any 
veils  on  natural  functions,  certainly  not  in  the  case  of 
a  child.  When  we  consider  that  these  children 
run  about  naked,  that  their  excretory  functions 
are  treated  openly  and  naturally,  that  there  is  no 
general  taboo  on  bodily  parts  or  on  nakedness  in 
general ;  when  we  further  consider  that  small  children 
at  the  age  of  three  and  four  are  beginning  to  be  aware 
of  the  existence  of  such  a  thing  as  genital  sexuality, 
and  of  the  fact  that  this  will  be  their  pleasure  quite 
soon  just  as  other  infantile  plays  will  be — ^we  can  see 
that  social  factors  rather  than  biological  explain  the 
difference  between  the  two  societies. 

The  stage  which  I  am  now  describing  in  Melanesia — 
that  which  corresponds  to  our  latency  period — is  the 
stage  of  infantile  independence,  where  small  boys 
and  girls  play  together  in  a  sort  of  juvenile  republic. 
Now,  one  of  the  main  interests  of  these  children 
consists  of  sexual  pastijnes.  At  an  early  age  children 
are  initiated  by  each  other,  or  sometimes  by  a  slightly 
older  companion,  into  the  practices  of  sex.  Naturally 
at  this  stage  they  are  unable  to  carry  out  the  act 
properly,  but  they  content  themselves  with  all  sorts 
of  games  in  which  they  are  left  quite  at  liberty  by  their 
elders,  and  thus  they  can  satisfy  their  curiosity  and 
their  sensuality  directly  and  without  disguise. 

There  can  be  no  doubt  that  the  dominating  interest 
of  such  games  is  what  Freud  would  call  'genital', 


56  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

that  they  are  largely  determined  by  the  desire  to 
imitate  the  acts  and  interests  of  elder  children  and 
elders,  and  that  this  period  is  one  which  is  almost 
completely  absent  from  the  life  of  better-class  children 
in  Europe,  and  which  exists  only  to  a  small  degree 
among  peasants  and  proletarians.  When  speaking 
of  these  amusements  of  the  children,  the  natives  will 
frequently  allude  to  them  as  '  copulation  amusement ' 
{mwaygini  kwayta).  Or  else  it  is  said  that  they 
are  playing  at  marriage. 

It  must  not  be  imagined  that  all  games  are  sexual. 
Many  do  not  lend  themselves  at  all  to  it.  But  there 
are  some  particular  pastimes  of  small  children  in  which 
sex  plays  the  predominant  part.  Melanesian  children 
are  fond  of  '  playing  husband  and  wife.'  A  boy 
and  girl  build  a  little  shelter  and  call  it  their  home  ; 
there  they  pretend  to  assume  the  functions  of  husband 
and  wife,  and  amongst  those  of  course  the  most 
important  one  of  sexual  intercourse.  At  other  times, 
a  group  of  children  will  go  for  a  picnic  where  the 
entertainment  consists  of  eating,  fighting,  and  making 
love.  Or  they  will  carry  out  a  mimic  ceremonial 
trade  exchange,  ending  up  with  sexual  activities. 
Crude  sensual  pleasure  alone  does  not  seem  to  satisfy 
them ;  in  such  more  elaborate  games  it  must  be 
blended  with  some  imaginative  and  romantic  interest. 

A  very  important  point  about  this  infantile  sexuality 
is  the  attitude  of  the  elder  generation  towards  it. 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      57 

As  I  have  said,  the  parents  do  not  look  upon  it  as  in 
the  least  reprehensible.  Generally  they  take  it 
entirely  for  granted.  The  most  they  will  do  is  to 
speak  jestingly  about  it  to  one  another,  discussing 
the  love  tragedies  and  comedies  of  the  child  world. 
Never  would  they  dream  of  interfering  or  frowning 
disapproval,  provided  the  children  show  a  due  amount 
of  discretion,  that  is,  do  not  perform  their  amorous 
games  in  the  house,  but  go  away  somewhere  apart 
in  the  bush. 

But  above  all  the  children  are  left  entirely  to  them- 
selves in  their  love  affairs.  Not  only  is  there  no 
parental  interference,  but  rarely,  if  ever,  does  it  come 
about  that  a  man  or  a  woman  take  a  perverse  sexual 
interest  in  children,  and  certainly  they  would  never 
be  seen  to  mix  themselves  up  in  the  games  in  this 
role.  Violation  of  children  is  imknown,  and  a 
person  who  played  sexually  with  a  child  would  be 
thought  ridiculous  and  disgusting. 

An  extremely  important  feature  in  the  sexual 
relations  of  children  is  the  brother  and  sister  taboo, 
already  mentioned.  From  an  early  age,  when  the  girl 
first  puts  on  her  grass  petticoat,  brothers  and  sisters 
of  the  same  mother  must  be  separated  from  each 
other,  in  obedience  to  the  strict  taboo  which  enjoins 
that  there  shall  be  no  intimate  relations  between  them. 
Even  earlier,  when  they  first  can  move  about  and  walk, 
they  play  in  different  groups.     Later  on  they  never 


58  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

consort  together  socially  on  a  free  footing,  and  above 
all  there  must  never  be  the  sUghtest  suspicion  of  an 
interest  of  one  of  them  in  the  love  affairs  of  the  other. 
Although  there  is  comparative  freedom  in  pla5dng 
and  language  between  children,  not  even  quite  a  small 
boy  would  associate  sex  with  his  sisters,  still  less  make 
any  sexual  allusion  or  joke  in  their  presence.  This 
continues  right  through  Hfe,  and  it  is  the  highest  degree 
of  bad  form  to  speak  to  a  brother  about  his  sister's 
love  affairs,  or  vice  versa.  The  imposition  of  this 
taboo  leads  to  an  early  breaking  up  of  family  hfe, 
since  the  boys  and  girls,  in  order  to  avoid  each  other, 
must  leave  the  parental  home  and  go  elsewhere. 
With  all  this,  we  can  perceive  the  enormous  difference 
which  obtains  in  the  juvenile  sexuality  at  this 
stage  of  later  childhood  between  ourselves  and  the 
Melanesians.  While  amongst  ourselves,  in  the  educated 
classes,  there  is  at  this  time  a  break  of  sexuality 
and  a  period  of  latency  with  amnesia,  in  Melanesia 
the  extremely  early  beginning  of  genital  interest 
leads  to  a  type  of  sexuaUty  entirely  unknown  among 
us.  From  this  time,  the  sexuality  of  the  Melanesians 
will  continuously  though  gradually  develop,  till  it 
reaches  puberty.  On  the  condition  that  one  taboo  is 
respected  in  the  strictest  and  most  complete  manner, 
society  gives  complete  free  play  to  juvenile  sexuahty. 


VIII 

PUBERTY 

A  T  an  age  varjdng  with  climate  and  race  and 
stretching  from  about  the  ninth  to  the  fifteenth 
year,  the  child  enters  upon  the  age  of  puberty.  For 
puberty  is  not  a  moment  or  a  turning  point  but  a  more 
or  less  prolonged  period  of  development  during  which 
the  sexual  apparatus,  the  whole  system  of  internal 
secretions  and  the  organism  in  general  are  entirely 
recast.  We  cannot  consider  puberty  as  a  conditio  sine 
qua  non  of  sexual  interest  or  even  of  sexual  activities, 
since  non-nubile  girls  can  copulate  and  immature  boys 
are  known  to  have  erections  and  to  practise  immissio 
penis.  But  undoubtedly  the  age  of  puberty  must  be 
regarded  as  the  most  important  landmark  in  the  sexual 
history  of  the  individual. 

Sex  is,  moreover,  so  intimately  bound  up  at  this  stage 
with  the  other  aspects  of  life  that  in  this  chapter  we 
shall  treat  sexual  and  social  matters  together  and  not 
divide  them  as  we  did  in  the  case  of  the  two  previous 
stages.  In  comparing  here  the  Trobrianders  of 
Melanesia  with  our  own  society,  it  is  important  to 
note  that  these  savages  have  no  initiation  rites  at 
puberty.     While  this  will  remove  one  item  of  extreme 

59 


6o  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

importance  from  our  discussion,  it  will  allow  us  on 
the  other  hand  to  draw  the  comparison  between 
patriliny  and  matriliny  more  clearly  and  closely, 
since  in  most  other  savage  societies  initiation 
ceremonies  completely  mask  or  modify  this  period. 

In  our  own  society,  we  have  to  speak  separately 
of  the  boy  and  of  the  girl,  for  at  this  point  the  two 
part  company  completely  in  sexual  matters.  In 
a  man's  life,  puberty  means  the  acquisition  of  full 
mental  powers  as  well  as  bodily  maturity  and  the 
final  formation  of  the  sexual  characters.  With  his 
new  manliness  his  whole  relation  to  life  in  general 
changes  as  deeply  as  his  relation  to  sexual  matters 
and  to  his  position  in  the  family.  Beginning  with  this 
last,  we  can  observe  an  extremely  interesting 
phenomenon  which  greatly  affects  his  attitude  to  his 
mother,  sister,  or  other  female  relatives.  The  typical 
adolescent  bo}''  of  our  civiHzed  communities  begins 
to  show  at  the  time  of  puberty  an  extreme  embarrass- 
ment towards  his  mother,  affects  scorn  and  a  certain 
brutality  towards  his  sisters  and  is  ashamed  before 
his  comrades  of  all  his  female  relatives.  Who  of  us 
does  not  remember  the  pangs  of  ineffable  shame 
when,  jauntily  going  along  with  our  school  fellows, 
we  met  suddenly  our  mother,  our  aunt,  our  sister, 
or  even  our  girl  cousin  and  were  obliged  to  greet 
her.  There  was  a  feeling  of  intense  guilt,  of  being 
caught  in  flagrante  delicto.     Some  boys  tried  to  ignore 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      6i 

the  embarrassing  encounter,  others  more  brave  blushed 
crimson  and  saluted,  but  everyone  felt  that  it  was  a 
shadow  on  his  social  position,  an  outrage  on  his 
manliness  and  independence.  Without  entering  into 
the  psychology  of  this  phenomenon,  we  can  see  that 
the  shame  and  confusion  felt  here  is  of  the  same  type 
as  that  associated  with  any  breach  of  good  manners. 

This  newly  acquired  manliness  affects  deeply  the 
boy's  attitude  towards  the  world,  his  whole  Weltan- 
schauung. He  begins  to  have  his  independent  opinions, 
his  personality  and  his  own  honour,  to  maintain  his 
position  towards  authority  and  intellectual  leadership. 
This  is  a  new  stage  in  the  relation  between  father 
and  son,  another  reckoning  up  and  a  new  testing 
of  the  father  ideal.  At  this  point  it  succumbs  if  the 
father  is  found  out  to  be  a  fool  or  a  '  bounder  ',  to  be 
a  hypocrite  or  an  '  old  fogey  '.  He  is  usually  disposed 
of  for  life,  and  in  any  case  loses  the  chance  of  effectively 
influencing  the  boy  even  if  in  later  life  the  two  should 
come  together  again.  If  on  the  other  hand  the  father 
can  stand  the  extremely  severe  scrutiny  of  this  epoch 
there  is  a  great  chance  of  his  surviving  as  an  ideal 
for  life.  The  reverse  is  also  true,  of  course,  for  the 
father  as  well  keenly  examines  his  son  at  this  epoch, 
and  is  equally  critical  as  to  whether  the  boy  comes  up 
to  his  own  ideal  of  what  his  future  successor  should  be. 

The  new  attitude  towards  sex,  the  recrystallization  at 
puberty,  exerts  a  great  influence  on  the  boy's  attitude 


62  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

not  only  to  his  father,  but  to  his  mother  as  well. 
The  educated  boy  only  now  fully  realizes  the  biological 
nature  of  the  bond  between  his  parents  and  himself. 
If  he  deeply  loves  and  worships  his  mother,  as  is 
usually  the  case,  and  if  he  can  continue  to  ideaUze 
his  father,  then  the  idea  of  his  bodily  origin  from  his 
parent's  sexual  intercourse,  though  at  first  making 
a  rift  in  his  mental  world,  can  be  dealt  with.  If  on 
the  other  hand  he  scorns  and  hates  his  father,  be  it 
unavowedly  as  so  often  happens,  the  idea  brings 
about  a  permanent  defilement  of  the  mother  and 
a  besmirching  of  things  most  dear  to  him. 

The  new  manhood  influences  above  all  the  boy's 
sexual  outlook.  Mentally  he  is  ready  for  knowledge, 
physiologically  ready  for  applying  it  in  Hfe.  Usually 
he  receives  his  first  lessons  in  sex  at  this  time,  and  in 
some  form  or  other  starts  sexual  activities,  not  so 
often,  probably,  in  the  normal,  regular  manner,  but 
frequently  through  masturbation  or  nocturnal 
pollutions.  This  epoch  is  in  many  respects  the 
dividing  of  the  roads  for  the  boy.  Either  the 
newly  awakened  sex  impulse,  appeaUng  to  a 
strong  temperament  and  to  easy  morals,  absorbs 
him  completely,  carries  him  off  his  feet  once  for 
ever  in  a  wave  of  over-mastering  sensuality ;  or 
else  other  interests  and  moraUty  are  strong  enough 
to  stave  it  off  partially  or  even  completely.  As 
long  as  he  preserves  an  ideal  of  chastity  and  is  able 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      63 

to  fight  for  it,  the  leverage,  is  there  for  the  lifting 
of  the  sexual  impulses  to  a  higher  level.  In  this, 
of  course,  the  temptations  are  largely  determined 
by  the  social  setting  and  the  mode  of  life  of  the  boy. 
The  racial  characteristics  of  a  commimity,  its  code  of 
morals  and  its  cultural  values  establish  great  differences 
within  European  civilization.  In  certain  classes  of 
some  countries,  it  is  usual  for  the  boy  to  succumb 
to  the  disintegrating  forces  of  easy  sexuahty.  In 
others,  he  can  take  his  chance.  In  others,  again, 
society  relieves  him  of  a  great  deal  of  responsibility 
by  la5dng  down  rules  of  stem  morality. 

In  his  relations  to  persons  of  the  other  sex,  there 
appears  at  first  something  parallel  to  his  attitude 
towards  mother  and  sister  ;  a  certain  embarrassment, 
and  polarity  of  attraction  and  repulsion.  The  woman 
who,  he  feels,  can  exercise  a  deep  influence  on  him  alarms 
him  and  fills  him  with  suspicion.  He  senses  in  her  a 
danger  to  his  awakening  independence  and  manliness. 

At  this  stage  also  the  new  fusion  of  tenderness  with 
sexuaUty  which  comes  about  towards  the  end  of 
puberty  mixes  up  infantile  memories  of  maternal 
tenderness  with  the  new  elements  of  sexuaUty. 
Imagination  and  especially  dream  fantasies  bring 
about  horrible  confusion  and  play  strange  tricks 
on  the  boy's  mind.^ 

^  This  conception  is  more  fully  elaborated  below.  Part  IV, 
Chapter  IX. 


64  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

All  this  refers  more  especially  to  the  boy  belonging 
to  the  higher,  well-to-do  classes.  If  we  compare  the 
peasant  or  proletarian  youth  with  him,  we  see  that 
the  essential  elements  are  the  same,  though  there  is 
perhaps  less  individual  variation  and  the  general 
picture  is  more  sober. 

Thus  there  is  also  a  period  of  affective  crudeness 
towards  mother  and  sister  which  is  especially  notice- 
able in  a  young  peasant.  The  quarrels  with  the 
father  crop  up  as  a  rule  with  an  increased  violence 
now  that  the  boy  realizes  his  own  forces  and  his  own 
position  as  a  successor,  now  that  he  feels  a  new  greed 
for  possession  and  a  new  ambition  for  influence. 
Often  a  regular  fight  for  supremacy  begins  at  this  time. 
In  sexual  matters  there  is  not  as  violent  a  crisis  and 
this  reacts  less  directly  on  the  parental  relation. 
But  the  main  outlines  are  the  same. 

The  girl  of  the  educated  classes  goes  through  a 
crisis  at  her  first  menstruation  which,  while  it 
encroaches  on  liberty  and  compUcates  hfe,  adds  to 
its  mysterious  attraction  and  is  usually  eagerly  awaited. 
But  puberty  is  less  of  a  turning  point  socially  to  a  girl ; 
she  continues  to  live  at  home  or  to  carry  on  her 
education  at  a  boarding  school,  but  all  her  occupations 
and  her  training  are  in  harmony  with  ordinary  family 
life — not  taking  the  modern,  professional  girl  into 
account.  Her  aim  in  life  is  to  await  marriage.  One 
important  element  in  her  relation  to  the  family  is  the 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      65 

rivalry  between  mother  and  daughter  which  often  sets 
in  at  this  time.  How  often  it  makes  its  appearance 
in  a  decided,  undisguised  form  ^  is  hard  to  say,  but 
there  can  be  no  doubt  that  it  introduces  a  distorted 
element  into  the  typical  relations  of  the  ordinary 
family.  At  this  time,  also,  and  not  earlier,  there 
enters  a  special  tenderness  into  the  relations  between 
father  and  daughter,  which  not  infrequently  becomes 
correlated  with  the  maternal  rivalry.  This  is  the 
configuration  of  the  Electra  complex;  it  is  therefore 
of  an  entirely  different  nature  from  the  Oedipus 
complex.  Putting  on  one  side  the  greater  hysterical 
tendency  of  women,  for  here  we  are  concerned  with 
the  ground  work  of  normality,  the  Electra  complex 
is  less  frequent  and  has  less  social  importance  as  well 
as  a  smaller  influence  on  Western  culture.  On  the 
other  hand,  its  influence  makes  itself  more  frequently 
felt  and  the  father-daughter  incest  seems  to  be 
incomparably  more  frequent  in  real  occurrence  than 
that  between  mother  and  son,  for  various  reasons 
of  a  biological  and  sociological  nature.  Since,  however, 
our  interest  in  this  discussion  is  mainly  in  the  cultural 
and  social  influence  of  the  complexes,  we  cannot 
follow  the  parallel  between  the  Oedipus  and  Electra 
complexes  in  detail.  Nor  can  we  enter  into  a  com- 
parison    between     the    higher    classes,    where     the 

^  Such  as  we  find  it  so  powerfully  described  for  instance  in  the 
very  instructive  novel  of  Maupassant,  Fort  comme  la  Mort. 

r 


66  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

repressions  are  stronger,  where  there  is  more  hysteria 
but  fewer  cases  of  actual  incest  occur,  and  the  lower 
classes,  where,  since  the  girl's  sex  interest  is  frequently 
engaged  earlier  and  more  normally,  she  is  less  liable 
to  hysterical  distortions,  but  suffers  more  frequently 
from  persecution  by  the  father.^ 

Let  us  now  turn  to  the  Trobriand  Islands.  Puberty 
begins  there  earlier  than  with  us,  but  at  the  same 
time,  when  it  sets  in  boys  and  girls  have  already 
begun  their  sexual  activities.  In  the  social  life  of  the 
individual^  puberty  does  not  constitute  a  sharp 
turning  point  as  in  those  savage  communities  where 
initiation  ceremonies  exist.  Gradually,  as  he  passes 
to  manhood,  the  boy  begins  to  take  a  more  active 
part  in  economic  pursuits  and  tribal  occupations, 
he  is  considered  a  young  man  (ulatile) ,  and  by  the  end 
of  puberty  he  is  a  full  member  of  the  tribe,  ready  to 
marry  and  carry  on  all  his  duties  as  well  as  to  enjoy 
his  privileges.  The  girl,  who  at  the  beginning  of 
puberty  acquires  more  freedom  and  independence 
from  her  family,  has  also  to  do  more  work,  amuse 
herself   more   intensely,    and   carry   on   such   duties. 


^  Among  peasants,  the  attempts  of  father  on  daughter  are  very 
frequent.  This  seems  especially  to  be  the  case  among  the  Latin 
races.  I  have  been  told  that  in  Rumania  the  occurrence  of  this 
type  of  incest  is  very  common  among  peasants,  and  so  it  seems  to 
be  in  Italy.  In  the  Canary  Islands,  I  know  myself  of  a  few  cases  of 
father  and  daughter  committing  incest,  not  in  a  clandestine  manner, 
but  living  openly  in  a  shameless  menage  and  rearing  their  children. 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      67 

ceremonial,  economic,  and  legal,  as  are  entailed  by 
full  womanhood. 

But  the  most  important  change,  and  the  one  which 
interests  us  most,  is  the  partial  break-up  of  the  family 
at  the  time  when  the  adolescent  boys  and  girls  cease 
to  be  permanent  inmates  of  the  parental  home.  For 
brothers  and  sisters,  whose  avoidance  has  begun 
long  before  in  childhood,  must  now  keep  an  extremely 
strict  taboo,  so  that  any  possibility  of  contact  while 
engaged  in  sexual  pursuits  must  be  eliminated.  This 
danger  is  obviated  by  a  special  institution,  the 
bukumatula.  This  name  is  given  to  special  houses 
inhabited  by  groups  of  adolescent  boys  and  girls. 
A  boy  as  he  reaches  puberty  will  join  such  a  house, 
which  is  owned  by  some  mature  youth  or  young 
widower  and  tenanted  by  a  number  of  youths,  from 
three  to  six,  who  are  there  joined  by  their  sweethearts.^ 
Thus  the  parental  home  is  drained  completely  of  its 
adolescent  males,  though  until  the  boy's  marriage 
he  will  always  come  back  for  food,  and  will  also 
continue  to  work  for  his  household  to  some  extent. 
A  girl,  on  the  rare  nights  of  chastity  when  she  is  not 
engaged  in  one  bukumatula  or  another,  may  return 
to  sleep  at  home. 

What    is    the    attitude    towards    mother,    father, 

^  For  a  detailed  description  and  analysis  of  this  remarkable 
institution,  as  close  a  mimicry  of  group -marriage  as  we  have  on 
record,  compare  the  author's  forthcoming  Sexual  Life  of  Savages. 


68  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

sister  or  brother  into  which  the  sentiments  of  the 
Melanesian  boy  and  girl  crystalUze  at  this  important 
epoch  ?  As  with  a  modern  European  boy  and  girl, 
we  see  that  at  this  period  there  is  only  a  final  cast, 
a  consolidation  of  what  has  been  in  gradual  formation 
during  the  previous  stages  of  life.  The  mother, 
from  whom  the  child  has  been  weaned — in  the  widest 
sense  of  the  word — remains  still  the  pivotal  point 
of  all  kinship  and  relationship  for  the  rest  of  life. 
The  boy's  status  in  society,  his  duties  and  privileges, 
are  determined  with  regard  to  her  and  her  relatives. 
If  no  one  else  is  there  to  provide  for  her,  he  will  have  to 
do  it,  while  her  house  will  always  be  his  second 
home.  Affection  and  attachment,  prescribed  by  social 
obligations,  remain  also  deeply  founded  in  real  senti- 
ment, and  when  an  adult  man  dies  or  suffers  mishap, 
his  mother  will  be  the  one  to  sorrow  and  her  waihng 
will  last  longest  and  be  most  sincere.  Yet  there  is 
little  of  the  personal  friendship,  the  mutual  confidences 
and  intimacy  which  is  so  characteristic  of  the  mother- 
to-son  relationship  in  our  society.  The  detachment 
from  the  mother,  carried  out  as  we  have  seen  at  every 
stage  more  easily  and  more  thoroughly  than  with  us, 
with  fewer  premature  wrenches  and  violent 
suppressions,  is  achieved  in  a  more  complete  and 
harmonious  manner. 

The  father  at  this  time  suffers  a  temporary  eclipse. 
The  boy,  who  as  a  child  was  fairly  independent  and 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      69 

became  the  member  of  the  small,  juvenile  republic, 
gains  now  on  the  one  hand  the  additional  freedom  of 
the  hukumatula,  while  on  the  other  he  becomes  much 
more  restricted  by  his  various  duties  towards  his 
kada  (maternal  uncle).  He  has  less  time  and  less 
interest  left  for  the  father.  Later  on,  when  friction 
with  the  maternal  uncle  makes  its  appearance,  he 
turns,  as  a  rule,  to  his  father  once  more,  and  their 
life  friendship  then  becomes  settled.  At  this  stage, 
however,  when  the  adolescent  has  to  learn  his  duties, 
to  be  instructed  in  traditions  and  to  study  his  magic, 
his  arts  and  crafts,  his  interest  in  his  mother's  brother, 
who  is  his  teacher  and  tutor,  is  greatest  and  their 
relations  are  at  their  best.^ 

There  is  one  more  important  difference  between 
the  Melanesian  boy's  feeling  for  his  parents  and  that 
of  the  educated  boy  in  our  own  society.  With  us, 
when  at  puberty  and  with  social  initiation  the  new 
fiery  vision  opens  before  the  youth,  its  glare  throws 
a  strange  shadow  on  his  previous  warm  feelings  for 
mother  and  father.  His  own  sexuality  estranges 
him  from  his  progenitors,  embarrasses  their  relations 
and   creates    deep    complications.      Not    so    in    the 

^  The  relation  between  these  three,  the  young  man,  his  father  and 
his  mother's  brother,  are  in  reality  somewhat  more  complicated 
than  I  have  been  able  to  show  here,  and  present  an  interesting  picture 
of  the  play  and  clash  of  the  incompatible  principles  of  kinship  and 
authority.  This  subject  will  be  discussed  in  a  forthcoming  book 
on  kinship.     Compare  also  Crime  and  Custom,  1926. 


70  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

matrilineal  society.  The  absence  of  the  early 
indecency  period  and  of  the  first  struggles  against 
parental  authority  ;  the  gradual  and  open  taking-up 
of  sex  ever  since  it  first  began  to  stir  in  the  young 
blood  ;  above  all  the  attitude  of  benevolent  onlookers 
which  the  parents  take  towards  the  sexuality  of 
their  young  ;  the  fact  of  the  mother's  withdrawing 
completely  but  gradually  from  the  boy's  passionate 
feeUngs  ;  the  father  smiling  his  approval — all  this 
brings  about  the  fact  that  the  intensification  of 
sexuality  at  puberty  exercises  no  direct  influence 
upon  the  relation  to  the  parents. 

One  relation,  that  between  brother  and  sister, 
is,  however,  deeply  affected  by  every  increase  of 
sexuahty — especially  at  puberty.  This  taboo,  which 
extends  to  all  free  association  and  excludes  the  motive 
of  sex  completely  from  the  relations  of  the  two,  affects 
the  sexual  outlook  of  both  in  general.  For  in  the  first 
place  it  must  be  kept  in  mind  that  this  taboo  is  the 
great  sexual  barrier  in  a  man's  life,  beyond  which  it 
is  illicit  to  trespass,  and  that  it  constitutes  also 
the  most  important  general  moral  rule.  The  pro- 
hibition, moreover,  which  starts  in  childhood  with 
the  separation  of  brothers  and  sisters  and  of  which 
this  separation  always  remains  the  main  point,  extends 
also  to  all  other  females  of  the  same  clan.  Thus  the 
sexual  world  is  for  the  boy  divided  into  two  moieties  : 
one  of  these,  embracing  the  women  of  his  own  clan, 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      71 

is  prohibited  to  him  ;    the  other,  to  which  women 
of  the  remaining  three  clans  belong,  is  lawful. 

Let  us  compare  now  the  brother-sister  relation  in 
Melanesia  and  Europe.  With  us,  the  intimacy  of 
childhood  gradually  cools  off  and  changes  into  a 
somewhat  constrained  relation,  in  which  the  sister 
is  naturally  but  not  completely  divided  from  her 
brother  by  social,  psychological  and  biological  factors. 
In  Melanesia,  as  soon  as  any  intimacy  in  play  or  in 
childish  confidences  might  spring  up,  the  strict  taboo 
sets  in.  The  sister  remains  a  mysterious  being, 
always  near  yet  never  intimate,  divided  by  the 
invisible  yet  all  powerful  wall  of  traditional  command 
which  gradually  changes  into  a  moral  and  personal 
imperative.  The  sister  remains  the  only  spot  on  the 
sexual  horizon  permanently  hidden.  Any  natural 
impulses  of  infantile  tenderness  are  as  systematically 
repressed  from  the  outset  as  other  natural  impulses 
are  in  our  children,  and  the  sister  becomes  thus 
'  indecent  '  as  an  object  of  thought,  interest  and 
feeling,  just  as  the  forbidden  things  do  for  our  children. 
Later  on,  as  the  personal  experiences  in  sexuaHty 
develop,  the  veil  of  reserve  separating  the  two  thickens. 
Though  they  have  constantly  to  avoid  each  other, 
yet,  owing  to  the  fact  that  he  is  the  provider  of  her 
household,  they  must  constantly  keep  one  another 
in  thought  and  attention.  Such  artificial  and 
premature    repression    must    have    its    results.     The 


72  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

psychologists   of    the    Freudian   school   could    easily 
foretell  them.- 

In  all  this  I  have  spoken  almost  exclusively  from 
the  point  of  view  of  the  boy.  What  is  the  configura- 
tion of  the  Melanesian  girl's  attitude  to  her  family 
as  it  crystallizes  at  puberty  ?  Roughly  speaking, 
her  attitude  does  not  differ  so  much  from  that  of 
her  European  counterpart  as  is  the  case  with  the 
boy.  Just  because  of  the  brother  and  sister  taboo, 
the  Trobriand  matriarchy  touches  the  girl  less  than 
the  boy.  For,  since  her  brother  is  strictly  forbidden 
to  take  any  interest  in  her  sexual  affairs,  including 
her  marriage,  and  her  mother's  brother  has  also  to 
keep  aloof  from  these  matters,  it  is,  strangely  enough, 
her  father  who  is  her  guardian  as  regards  matrimonial 
arrangements.  So  that  between  father  and  daughter 
not  quite  an  identical,  but  a  very  similar  relation  exists 
as  with  us.  For  among  ourselves  the  friction  between 
the  female  child  and  her  father  is  normally  small, 
and  thus  the  relation  approaches  nearer  to  that 
found  in  the  Trobriands  between  father  and  child. 
There,  on  the  other  hand,  the  intimacy  between  a 
grown-up  man  and  an  adolescent  girl,  who,  be  it 
remembered,  is  not  considered  his  kinswoman,  is 
fraught  with  some  temptation.  This  is  not  lessened 
but  increased  by  the  fact  that  though  the  daughter 
is  not  actually  tabooed  by  the  laws  of  exogamy, 
yet  sexual  intercourse  between  the  two  is  considered 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      73 

in  the  highest  degree  reprehensible,  though  it  is  never 
given  the  name  of  suvasova,  which  means  breach 
of  exogamy.  The  reason  for  this  prohibition  between 
father  and  daughter  is,  of  course,  simply  that  it  is 
wrong  to  have  sexual  intercourse  with  the  daughter 
of  the  woman  with  whom  you  co-habit.  We  shall 
not  be  astonished  when  later,  as  we  trace  the  influence 
of  the  typical  attitudes  between  members  of  the 
family,  we  shall  find  that  father-daughter  incest 
happens  in  reahty,  though  it  hardly  could  be  called 
an  obsession,  nor  has  it  any  echo  in  folk-lore. 

With  regard  to  her  mother,  the  general  course  of 
the  relation  is  more  natural  than  that  in  Europe, 
though  not  essentially  different.  One  point  of 
difference  there  is  :  namely,  that  the  exodus  of  the 
girl  at  puberty  from  the  parental  home  and  her 
numerous  outside  sex  interests  normally  prevent 
the  development  of  mother-daughter  rivalries  and 
jealousies,  though  they  do  not  always  preclude  the 
occurrence  of  father-daughter  incest.  Thus,  with  the 
exception  of  her  attitude  to  the  brother,  broadly 
speaking,  sentiments  similar  to  those  in  Europe  are 
to  be  found  in  a  Melanesian  girl. 


IX 

THE    COMPLEX    OF    MOTHER-RIGHT 

T  T  7E  have  been  comparing  the  two  civilizations,  the 
European  and  the  Melanesian,  and  we  have 
seen  that  there  exist  deep  differences,  some  of  the 
forces  by  which  society  moulds  man's  biological  nature 
being  essentially  dissimilar.  Though  in  each  there 
is  a  certain  latitude  given  to  sexual  freedom,  and  a 
certain  amount  of  interference  with  and  regulation  of 
the  sex  instinct,  yet  in  each  the  incidence  of  the 
taboo  and  the  play  of  sexual  liberty  within  its 
prescribed  bounds  are  entirely  different.  There  is 
also  a  quite  dissimilar  distribution  of  authority  within 
the  family,  and  correlated  with  it  a  different  mode 
of  counting  kinship.  We  have  followed  in  both 
societies  the  growth  of  the  average  boy  or  girl 
under  these  divergent  tribal  laws  and  customs.  We 
have  found  that  at  almost  every  step  there  are  great 
differences  due  to  the  interplay  between  biological 
impulse  and  social  rule  which  sometimes  harmonize, 
sometimes  conflict,  sometimes  lead  to  a  short  bliss, 
sometimes  to  an  inequilibrium  fraught,  however, 
with  possibilities  for  a  future  development.  At  the 
final  stage  of  the  child's  life-history,  after  it  has 
reached  maturity,  we  have  seen  its  feelings  crystallize 

74 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      75 

into  a  system  of  sentiments  towards  the  mother, 
father,  brother,  sister,  and  in  the  Trobriands,  the 
maternal  uncle,  a  system  which  is  typical  of  each 
society,  and  which,  in  order  to  adapt  ourselves  to 
psycho-analytic  terminology,  we  called  the  'Family 
Complex'  or  the  'nuclear  complex'. 

Now  allow  me  to  restate  briefly  the  main  features 
of  these  two  '  complexes  '.  The  Oedipus  complex,  the 
system  of  attitudes  typical  of  our  patriarchal  society, 
is  formed  in  early  infancy,  partly  during  the  transition 
between  the  first  and  second  stages  of  childhood, 
partly  in  the  course  of  the  latter.  So  that,  towards 
its  end,  when  the  boy  is  about  five  or  six  years  old, 
his  attitudes  are  well  formed,  though  perhaps  not 
finally  settled.  And  these  attitudes  comprise  already 
a  number  of  elements  of  hate  and  suppressed  desire. 
In  this,  I  think,  our  results  do  not  differ  to  any  extent 
from  those  of  psycho-analysis.^ 

In  the  matrilineal  society  at  that  stage,  though 
the  child  has  developed  very  definite  sentiments 
towards  its  father  and  mother,  nothing  suppressed, 
nothing  negative,  no  frustrated  desire  forms  a  part  of 
them.  Whence  arises  this  difference  ?  As  we  saw,  the 
social  arrangements  of  the  Trobriand  matriliny  are  in 
almost  complete  harmony  with  the  biological  course  of 

^  I  have  come  to  realize  since  the  above  was  written  that  no 
orthodox  or  semi-orthodox  psycho-analyst  would  accept  my  state- 
ment of  the  '  complex  ',  or  of  any  aspect  of  the  doctrine. 


76  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

development,  while  the  institution  of  father -right  found 
in  our  society  crosses  and  represses  a  number  of  natural 
impulses  and  inclinations.  To  trace  it  more  in  detail, 
there  is  the  passionate  attachment  to  the  mother, 
the  bodily  desire  to  cling  close  to  her,  which  in 
patriarchal  institutions  is  in  one  way  or  another 
broken  or  interfered  with ;  the  influence  of  our 
morality,  which  condemns  sexuality  in  children; 
the  brutality  of  the  father,  especially  in  the  lower 
strata,  the  atmosphere  of  his  exclusive  right  to  mother 
and  child  acting  subtly  but  strongly  in  the  higher 
strata,  the  fear  felt  by  the  wife  of  displeasing  her 
husband — all  these  influences  force  apart  parents  and 
children.  Even  where  the  rivalry  between  father 
and  child  for  the  mother's  personal  attention  is  reduced 
to  a  minimum,  or  to  naught,  there  comes,  in  the  second 
period,  a  distinct  clash  of  social  interests  between 
father  and  child.  The  child  is  an  encumbrance 
and  an  obstacle  to  the  parental  freedom,  a  reminder 
of  age  and  decUne  and,  if  it  is  a  son,  often  the  menace 
of  a  future  social  rivalry.  Thus,  over  and  above 
the  clash  of  sensuality,  there  is  ample  room  for 
social  friction  between  father  and  child.  I  say 
advisedly  'child'  and  not  'boy',  for,  according 
to  our  results,  the  sex  difference  between  the  children 
does  not  play  any  great  part  at  this  stage,  nor  has  a 
closer  relation  between  father  and  daughter  as  yet 
made  its  appearance. 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      ^^ 

All  these  forces  and  influences  are  absent  from 
the  matrilineal  society  of  the  Trobriands.  First  of 
all — and  that  has,  hien  entendu,  nothing  to  do  with 
matriliny — there  is  no  condemnation  of  sex  or  of 
sensuality  as  such,  above  all,  no  moral  horror  at  the 
idea  of  infantile  sexuality.  The  sensuous  clinging 
of  the  child  to  his  mother  is  allowed  to  take  its  natural 
course  till  it  plays  itself  out  and  is  diverted  by  other 
bodily  interests.  The  attitude  of  the  father  to  the 
child  during  these  two  early  periods  is  that  of  a  near 
friend  and  helper.  At  the  time  when  our  father  makes 
himself  pleasant  at  best  by  his  entire  absence  from 
the  nursery,  the  Trobriand  father  is  first  a  nurse 
and  then  a  companion. 

The  development  of  pre-sexual  life  at  this  stage 
also  differs  in  Europe  and  Melanesia  ;  the  repressions 
of  the  nursery  among  us,  especially  in  the  higher 
classes,  develop  a  tendency  towards  clandestine 
inquisitions  into  indecent  things,  especially  excretory 
functions  and  organs.  Among  the  savages  we  find 
no  such  period.  Now  this  infantile  pre-genital 
indecency  establishes  distinctions  between  the  decent- 
indecent,  the  pure-impure,  and  the  indecent,  parent- 
proof  compartment  reinforces  and  gives  additional 
depth  to  the  taboo  which  is  suddenly  cast  over  certain 
relations  to  the  mother,  that  is  to  the  premature 
banishment  from  her  bed  and  bodily  embraces. 

So  that  here  also  the  complications  of  our  society 


78  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

are  not  shared  by  the  children  in  the  Trobriands. 
At  the  next  stage  of  sexuality  we  find  a  no  less  relevant 
difference.  In  Europe  there  is  a  latency  period 
more  or  less  pronounced,  which  implies  a  breach  of 
continuity  in  the  sexual  development  and,  according 
to  Freud,  serves  to  reinforce  many  of  our  repressions 
and  the  general  amnesia,  and  to  create  many  dangers 
in  the  normal  development  of  sex.  On  the  other  hand, 
it  also  represents  the  triumph  of  other  cultural  and 
social  interests  over  sexuahty.  Among  the  savages 
at  this  stage,  sex  in  an  early  genital  form — a  form 
almost  unknown  among  ourselves — establishes  itself 
foremost  among  the  child's  interests,  never  to  be 
dislodged  again.  This,  while  in  many  respects  it  is 
culturally  destructive,  helps  the  gradual  and 
harmonious  weaning  of  the  child  from  the  family 
influences. 

With  this  we  have  entered  already  into  the  second 
half  of  the  child's  development,  for  the  period  of 
sexual  latency  in  our  society  belongs  to  this  part. 
When  we  consider  these  two  later  stages  which  form 
the  second  half  of  the  development,  we  find  another 
profound  difference.  With  us  during  this  early  period 
of  puberty,  the  Oedipus  complex,  the  attitudes  of  the 
boy  towards  his  parents,  only  soUdify  and  crystallize. 
In  Melanesia,  on  the  other  hand,  it  is  mainly 
during  this  second  epoch,  in  fact  almost  exclusively 
then,  that  any  complex  is  formed.     For  only  at  this 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      79 

period  is  the  child  submitted  to  the  system  of  repressions 
and  taboos  which  begin  to  mould  his  nature.  To 
these  forces  he  responds,  partly  by  adaptation,  partly 
by  developing  more  or  less  repressed  antagonisms 
and  desires,  for  human  nature  is  not  only  malleable 
but  also  elastic. 

The  repressing  and  moulding  forces  in  Melanesia 
are  twofold — the  submission  to  matriarchal  tribal 
law,  and  the  prohibitions  of  exogamy.  The  first  is 
brought  about  by  the  influence  of  the  mother's  brother, 
who,  in  appeahng  to  the  child's  sense  of  honour, 
pride  and  ambition,  comes  to  stand  to  him  in  a  relation 
in  many  respects  analogous  to  that  of  the  father  among 
us.  On  the  other  hand,  both  the  efforts  which  he 
demands  and  the  livalry  between  successor  and 
succeeded  introduce  the  negative  elements  of  jealousy 
and  resentment.  Thus  an  'ambivalent'  attitude  is 
formed  in  which  veneration  assumes  the  acknowledged 
dominant  place,  while  a  repressed  hatred  manifests 
itself  only  indirectly. 

The  second  taboo,  the  prohibition  of  incest,  surrounds 
the  sister,  and  to  a  lesser  degree  other  female  relatives 
on  the  maternal  side,  as  well  as  clanswomen,  with  a  veil 
of  sexual  mystery.  Of  all  this  class  of  women,  the  sister 
is  the  representative  to  whom  the  taboo  applies  most 
stringently.  We  noted  that  this  severing  taboo, 
entering  the  boy's  life  in  infancy,  cuts  short  the 
incipient  tenderness  towards  his  sister  which  is   the 


8o  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

natural  impulse  of  a  child.  This  taboo  also,  since  it 
makes  even  an  accidental  contact  in  sexual 
matters  a  crime,  causes  the  thought  of  the 
sister  to  be  always  present,  as  well  as  consistently 
repressed. 

Comparing  the  two  systems  of  family  attitudes 
briefly,  we  see  that  in  a  patriarchal  society,  the  infantile 
rivalries  and  the  later  social  functions  introduce  into 
the  attitude  of  father  and  son,  besides  mutual  attach- 
ment, also  a  certain  amount  of  resentment  and  dislike. 
Petween  mother  and  son,  on  the  other  hand,  the 
premature  separation  in  infancy  leaves  a  deep, 
unsatisfied  craving  which,  later  on,  when  sexual 
interests  come  in,  is  mixed  up  in  memory  with  the 
new  bodily  longings,  and  assumes  often  an  erotic 
character  which  comes  up  in  dreams  and  other 
fantasies.  In  the  Trobriands  there  is  no  friction 
between  father  and  son,  and  all  the  infantile  craving 
of  the  child  for  its  mother  is  allowed  gradually  to 
spend  itself  in  a  natural,  spontaneous  manner.  The 
ambivalent  attitude  of  veneration  and  dislike  is  felt 
between  a  man  and  his  mother's  brother,  while  the 
repressed  sexual  attitude  of  incestuous  temptation 
can  be  formed  only  towards  his  sister.  Applying  to 
each  society  a  terse,  though  somewhat  crude  formula, 
we  might  say  that  in  the  Oedipus  complex  there  is 
the  repressed  desire  to  kill  the  father  and  marry  the 
mother,    while    in    the    matrilineal    society    of    the 


THE    FORMATION    OF    A    COMPLEX      8i 

Trobriands  the  wish  is   to  marry  the  sister  and  to 
kill  the  maternal  uncle. 

With  this,  we  have  summarized  the  results  of  our 
detailed  inquiry,  and  given  an  answer  to  the  first 
problem  set  out  at  the  beginning,  that  is,  we  have 
studied  the  variation  of  the  nuclear  complex  with 
the  constitution  of  the  family,  and  we  have  shown 
in  what  manner  the  complex  depends  upon  some  of 
the  features  of  family  life  and  sexual  morals. 

We  are  indebted  to  psycho-analysis  for  the  discovery 
that  there  exists  a  typical  configuration  of  sentiments 
in  our  society,  and  for  a  partial  explanation,  mainly 
concerned  with  sex,  as  to  why  such  a  complex  must 
exist.  In  the  foregoing  pages  we  were  able  to  give 
an  outline  of  the  nuclear  complex  of  another  society,  a 
matriUneal  one,  where  it  has  never  been  studied  before. 
We  found  that  this  complex  differs  essentially  from  the 
patriarchal  one,  and  we  have  shown  why  it  must 
differ  and  what  social  forces  bring  it  about.  We  have 
drawn  our  comparison  on  the  broadest  basis,  and, 
without  neglecting  sexual  factors,  we  have  also  system- 
atically drawn  in  the  other  elements.  The  result 
is  important,  for,  so  far,  it  has  never  been  suspected 
that  another  type  of  nuclear  complex  might  be  in 
existence.  By  my  analysis,  I  have  established  that 
Freud's  theories  not  only  roughly  correspond  to  human 
psychology,  but  that  they  follow  closely  the  modifica- 
tion  in   human   nature    brought    about    by   various 


82  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

constitutions  of  society.  In  other  words,  I  have 
established  a  deep  correlation  between  the  type  of 
society  and  the  nuclear  complex  found  there.  While 
this  is  in  a  sense  a  confirmation  of  the  main  tenet  of 
Freudian  psychology,  it  might  compel  us  to  modify 
certain  of  its  features,  or  rather  to  make  some  of  its 
formulae  more  elastic.  To  put  it  concretely,  it  appears 
necessary  to  draw  in  more  systematically  the  correla- 
tion between  biological  and  social  influences ;  not 
to  assume  the  universal  existence  of  the  Oedipus 
complex,  but  in  studying  every  type  of  civilization, 
to  establish  the  special  complex  which  pertains  to  it. 


PART    II 

THE    MIRROR    OF    TRADITION 

I 

COMPLEX  AND   MYTH   IN   MOTHER-RIGHT 

TT  now  rerpains  to  proceed  to  the  study  of  the  second 
problem  posed  in  the  first  part  of  this  volume  ;  that 
is  to  investigate  whether  the  matriHneal  complex, 
so  entirely  different  in  its  genesis  and  its  character 
from  the  Oedipus  complex,  exercises  also  a  different 
influence  on  tradition  and  social  organization  ;  and  to 
show  that  in  the  social  life,  as  well  as  in  the  folk-lore,  of 
these  natives  their  specific  repressions  manifest  them- 
selves unmistakably.  Whenever  the  passions,  kept 
normally  within  traditional  bounds  by  rigid  taboos, 
customs  and  legal  penalties,  break  through  in  crime, 
perversion,  aberration,  or  in  one  of  those  dramatic 
occurrences  which  shake  from  time  to  time  the  hum- 
drum life  of  a  savage  community — then  these  passions 
reveal  the  matriarchal  hatred  of  the  maternal  uncle 
or  the  incestuous  wishes  towards  the  sister.  The 
folk-lore  of  these  Melanesians  also  mirrors  the 
matrilineal  complex.  The  examination  of  myth, 
fairy  tales  and  legend,  as  well  as  of  magic,  will  show 

83 


84  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

that  the  repressed  hatred  of  the  maternal  uncle, 
ordinarily  masked  by  conventional  reverence  and 
solidarity,  breaks  through  in  those  narratives  con- 
structed on  the  model  of  the  day -dream  and  dictated 
by  repressed  longings. 

Especially  interesting  is  the  magic  of  love  of  these 
natives  and  the  mythology  connected  with  it.  All 
sexual  attraction,  all  power  of  seduction  is  believed 
to  reside  in  the  magic  of  love.  This  magic  again  the 
natives  regard  as  founded  in  a  dramatic  occurrence 
of  the  past,  narrated  in  a  strange  tragic  myth  of 
brother  and  sister  incest.  Thus  the  position  established 
by  the  description  of  social  relations  within  the  family, 
and  by  an  analysis  of  kinship,  can  also  be  independently 
demonstrated  by  the  study  of  the  culture  of  these 
Melanesian  natives. 


II 

DISEASE    AND    PERVERSION 

nnHE  evidence  adduced  in  this  part  of  the  essay  is 
not  quite  homogeneous.  While  on  some  points 
I  have  had  full  information,  I  shall  have  to  confess 
my  ignorance  or  only  incomplete  knowledge  in  others, 
and  there  I  shaU  indicate  the  problem  rather  than 
solve  it.  This  is  due  partly  to  my  lack  of  expert 
knowledge  of  mental  disease,  partly  to  my  having 
found  it  impossible  to  psycho-analyze  the  natives  by 
the  orthodox  technique;  partly  to  an  unavoidable 
unevenness  in  the  material,  especially  that  which 
I  collected  among  other  tribes  where  I  resided  for  a 
much  shorter  time  and  worked  under  less  favourable 
conditions  than  in  the  Trobriands, 

I  shall  start  with  the  weakest  items  in  my  repertoire. 
Here  comes  first  the  question  of  neurosis  and  mental 
disease.  We  have  seen  in  the  comparative  account  of 
the  child's  development  among  ourselves  and  in  the 
Trobriands  that  the  matrilineal  complex  is  formed 
later  in  the  life  of  a  child,  that  it  is  formed  outside 
the  intimacy  of  the  family  circle,  that  it  entails  fewer 
shocks,  if  any,  that  it  is  due  mainly  to  the  play  of 
rivalry,  while  its  erotic  thwartings  do  not  go  to  the 

85 


86  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

roots  of  infantile  sexuality.  Since  this  is  so,  the 
Freudian  theory  of  neurosis  would  lead  us  to 
expect  a  much  smaller  prevalence  of  those  neuroses 
(ilbertragungsneurosen)  due  to  the  traumas  of  child- 
hood. It  is  a  great  pity  that  a  competent  alienist 
has  not  been  able  to  examine  the  Trobrianders  under 
the  same  conditions  as  myself,  for  I  think  he  could 
throw  some  interesting  sidelights  upon  the  assumptions 
of  psycho-analysis. 

When  studying  the  Trobrianders,  it  would  be  futile 
for  an  ethnographer  to  compare  them  with  Europeans, 
for  with  us  there  are  innumerable  other  factors  which 
complicate  the  picture  and  contribute  to  the  formation 
of  mental  disease.  But  some  thirty  miles  south  of  the 
Trobriands  there  are  the  Amphlett  Islands,  inhabited 
by  people  essentially  similar  in  race,  custom,  and 
language,  but  who  differ,  however,  very  much  in  social 
organization,  have  strict  sexual  morals,  that  is,  regard 
pre-nuptial  sexual  intercourse  with  disapproval  and 
have  no  institutions  to  support  sexual  license, 
while  their  family  life  is  much  more  closely  knit. 
Though  matrilineal,  they  have  a  much  more  developed 
patriarchal  authority,  and  this,  combined  with  the 
sexual  repressiveness,  establishes  a  picture  of  child- 
hood more  similar  to  our  own.^ 


1  For  a  description  of  some  customs  and  features  of  the  culture 
of  the  natives  of  the  Amphlett  Island,  see  the  author's  Argonauts 
of  the  Western  Pacific,  chap.  xi. 


THE     MIRROR     OF     TRADITION  87 

Now  even  with  my  own  limited  knowledge  of  the 
subject,  I  received  quite  a  different  impression  of  the 
neurotic  dispositions  of  these  natives.  In  the 
Trobriands,  though  I  knew  scores  of  natives  intimately 
and  had  a  nodding  acquaintance  with  many  more,  I 
could  not  name  a  single  man  or  woman  who  was 
hysterical  or  even  neurasthenic.  Nervous  tics,  com- 
pulsory actions  or  obsessive  ideas  were  not  to  be 
found.  In  the  system  of  native  pathology,  based,  of 
course,  on  belief  in  black  magic,  but  reasonably  true  to 
the  symptoms  of  disease,  there  are  two  categories  of 
mental  disorder — nagowa,  which  corresponds  to 
cretinism,  idiocy,  and  is  also  given  to  people  who  have 
a  defect  of  speech  ;  and  gwayluwa,  which  corresponds 
roughly  to  mania,  and  comprises  those  who  from  time 
to  time  break  out  into  acts  of  violence  and  deranged 
behaviour.  The  natives  of  the  Trobriands  know  well 
and  recognize  that  in  the  neighbouring  islands  of  the 
Amphletts  and  d'Entrecasteaux  there  are  other  types 
of  black  magic  which  can  produce  effects  on  the  mind 
different  from  those  known  to  themselves,  of  which 
the  symptoms  are  according  to  their  accounts  com- 
pulsory actions,  nervous  tics  and  various  forms  of 
obsession.  And  during  my  few  months'  stay  in  the 
Amphletts,  my  first  and  strongest  impression  was 
that  this  was  a  community  of  neurasthenics.  Coming 
from  the  open,  gay,  hearty  and  accessible  Trobrianders, 
it  was  astonishing  to  find  oneself  among  a  community 


88  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

of  people  distrustful  of  the  newcomer,  impatient  in 
work,  arrogant  in  their  claims,  though  easily  cowed 
and  extremely  nervous  when  tackled  more  energetic- 
ally. The  women  ran  away  as  I  landed  in  their  villages 
and  kept  in  hiding  the  whole  of  my  stay,  with  the 
exception  of  a  few  old  hags.  Apart  from  this  general 
picture,,  I  at  once  found  a  number  of  people  affected 
with  nervousness  whom  I  could  not  use  as  informants, 
because  they  would  either  lie  in  some  sort  of  fear, 
or  else  become  excited  and  offended  over  any  more 
detailed  questioning.  It  is  characteristic  that  in  the 
Trobriands  even  the  spiritualistic  mediums  are  poseurs 
rather  than  abnormal  people.  And  while  in  the 
Trobriands  black  magic  is  practised  in  a  '  scientific  ' 
manner  by  men,  that  is  by  methods  which  present  small 
claim  to  the  supernatural,  in  the  islands  of  the  south 
there  are  '  flying  wizards '  who  practise  the  magic 
which  in  other  parts  belongs  only  to  semi-fabulous 
witches,  and  who  make  at  first  sight  a  quite  abnormal 
mpression. 

In  another  community  among  whom  I  served  my 
ethnographic  apprenticeship,  and  whom  I  therefore 
did  not  study  with  the  same  methods  or  come  to  know 
as  intimately  as  I  did  the  Trobrianders,  the  conditions 
are  even  more  repressive  than  in  the  Amphlett  Islands. 
The  Mailu,  inhabiting  a  portion  of  the  south  coast  of 
New  Guinea,  are  patriUneal,  have  a  pronounced  paternal 
authority  in  the  family,  and  a  fairly  strict  code  of 


THE     MIRROR     OF     TRADITION  89 

repressive  sexual  morals. ^  Among  these  natives,  I  had 
noted  a  number  of  people  whom  I  had  classed  as 
neurasthenics,  and  therefore  useless  as  ethnographic 
informants. 

But  aU  these  tentative  remarks,  though  they  are  not 
sheer  guesses,  are  intended  only  to  raise  the  problem, 
and  to  indicate  what  the  solution  would  most  probably 
be.  The  problem  would  therefore  be  :  to  study  a 
number  of  matrilineal  and  patriarchal  communities 
of  the  same  level  of  culture,  to  register  the  variation 
of  sexual  repression  and  of  the  family  constitution, 
and  to  note  the  correlation  between  the  amount  of 
sexual  and  family  repression  and  the  prevalence  of 
hysteria  and  compulsion  neurosis.  The  conditions  in 
Melanesia,  where  side  by  side  we  find  communities 
living  under  entirely  different  conditions,  are  like  a 
naturally  arranged  experiment  for  this  purpose. 

Another  point  which  might  be  interpreted  in  favour  of 
the  Freudian  solution  of  this  problem  is  the  correlation 
of  sexual  perversions  with  sexual  repression.  Freud  has 
shown  that  there  is  a  deep  connection  between  the  course 
of  infantile  sexuality  and  the  occurrence  of  perversion 
in  later  life.     On  the  basis  of  his  theory,  an  entirely 

^  Compare  the  writer's  monograph  on  "  The  Natives  of  Mailu  " 
in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Royal  Society  of  Australia,  vol.  39,  1915, 
No  information  on  mental  disease  is  contained  there.  'I  had  hoped 
to  return  to  the  district  and  the  essay  was  published  cis  a  preliminary 
account  in  which  I  did  not  include  all  I  knew  and  had  noted,  thinking 
of  republishing  it  in  a  fuller  form. 


90  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

lax  community  like  that  of  the  Trobrianders,  who  do 
not  interfere  with  the  free  development  of  infantile 
sexuality,  should  show  a  minimum  of  perversions. 
This  is  fully  confirmed  in  the  Trobriands.  Homo- 
sexuality was  known  to  exist  in  other  tribes  and 
regarded  as  a  filthy  and  ridiculous  practice.  It  cropped 
up  in  the  Trobriands  only  with  the  influence  of  white 
man,  more  especially  of  white  man's  morality.  The 
boys  and  girls  on  a  Mission  Station,  penned  in  separate 
and  strictly  isolated  houses,  cooped  up  together,  had 
to  help  themselves  out  as  best  they  could,  since  that 
which  every  Trobriander  looks  upon  as  his  due  and 
right  was  denied  to  them.  According  to  very  careful 
inquiries  made  of  non-missionary  as  well  as  missionary 
natives,  homosexuality  is  the  rule  among  those 
upon  whom  white  man's  morality  has  been  forced  in 
such  an  irrational  and  unscientific  manner.  At  any 
rate,  there  were  a  few  cases  in  which  '  evil  doers  ' 
caught  in  flagrante  delicto,  were  ignominiously  banished 
from  the  face  of  God  back  into  the  villages,  where  one 
of  them  tried  to  continue  it,  but  had  to  give  up  under 
the  pressure  of  the  native  morals,  expressed  in  scorn 
and  derision.  I  have  also  reason  to  suppose  that 
perversions  are  much  more  prevalent  in  the  Amphlett 
and  d'Entrecasteaux  archipelago  in  the  south,  but 
again  I  have  to  regret  that  I  was  not  able  to  study  this 
important  subject  in  detail. 


Ill 

DREAMS  AND  DEEDS 

XTOW  we  have  to  study  how  the  integral  sentiment 

of    the    matrihneal    family    in  the   Trobriands 

expresses  itself  in  the  culture  and  social  organization 

of  the  natives.    If  we  pushed  this  problem  too  deep  it 

would  indeed  lead  us  to  a  minute  examination  from  this 

point  of  view  of  practically  every  manifestation  of  their 

tribal  life.    We  shall  have  to  make  a  selection  and  pick 

out  the  most  relevant  domains  of  fact.    These  can  be 

divided  into  two  categories  :   (i)  the  free  fantasies,  and 

(2)  the  data  of  folk-lore.   To  the  first  class  belong  those 

products  of  individual  imagination  such  as  dreams, 

day-dreams,  personal  desires  and  ideals  which,  coming 

from   the   individual's   own   life,   are   shaped   by   the 

endo-psychic  forces  of  his  personality.     In  this  class 

can  be  reckoned  not  only  the  manifestations  of  fantasies 

in  thought  and  dream,  but  also  in  deed.    For  a  crime 

Or  a  sin   or    an    act   which    outrages  pubhc  opinion 

and  decency  is  committed  when  the  repressive  forces 

of   law   and   moraUty   are   broken   by   the   repressed 

passions.     In  such  deeds  we  can  measure  both  the 

strength  of  the  ideal  and  the  depth  of  the  passion. 

We  shall  turn  now  to  this  first  class  of  dreams  and 

91 


92  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

deeds  in  which  the  individual  shakes  off  temporarily 
the  shackles  of  custom  and  reveals  the  repressed 
elements  and  the  conflict  with  the  repressing  forces. 

Dreams  and  day-dreams  are  not  an  easy  subject  for, 
study  among  the  Melanesians  of  the  Trobriand  Islands. 
It  is  a  remarkable  and  characteristic  feature  of  these 
natives,  in  which  they  seem  to  differ  from  other 
savages,  that  they  apparently  dream  little,  have  little 
interest  in  their  dreams,  seldom  relate  them  spon- 
taneously, do  not  regard  the  ordinary  dream  as  having 
any  prophetic  or  other  importance,  and  have  no  code 
of  symbolic  explanation  whatever.  When  I  tackled 
the  subject  directly,  as  I  often  did,  and  asked  my 
informants  whether  they  had  dreamt,  and,  if  so,  what 
their  dreams  had  been,  the  answer  was  usually  negative, 
with  rare  exceptions,  to  which  we  will  return.  Is  this 
absence  of  dreams,  or  rather  of  interest  in  dreams,  due 
to  the  fact  that  we  are  dealing  with  a  non-repressed 
society,  a  society  among  whom  sex  as  such  is  in  no  way 
restricted?  Is  it  so  because  their  '  complex  '  is  weak, 
appears  late,  and  has  few  infantile  elements  ?  This 
rarity  of  free  dreams  and  the  absence  of  strong  effect, 
hence  absence  of  remembrance,  point  to  the  same 
conclusion  as  the  absence  of  neurosis,  that  is,  to  the 
correctness  in  broad  outline  of  the  Freudian  theory. 
For  this  theory  affirms  that  the  main  cause  of  dreams 
is  unsatisfied  sexual  appetite,  and  especially  such 
sexual    or    quasi-sexual    impulses    as    are    repressed 


THE     MIRROR     OF     TRADITION  93 

violently  in  infancy.  To  this  question  one  could  only 
obtain  a  satisfactory  answer  by  collecting  rich  com- 
parative material  among  two  communities  of  similar 
culture  and  mode  of  living  but  with  different  repressions. 
I  have  used  so  far  the  expression  '  free  dreams ',  for 
there  is  a  class  of  dreams  which  it  is  difficult  to  range, 
whether  with  the  free  or  with  the  fixed  fantasies,  since 
they  run  on  lines  prescribed  by  tradition  and  could  be 
called  '  official  dreams  '.  Such,  for  instance,  are  dreams 
in  which  a  man  leading  an  enterprise  or  carrying  out 
some  task  is  supposed  to  dream  under  certain  circum- 
stances about  the  object  of  his  enterprise.  The  leaders 
of  fishing  excursions  dream  about  the  weather,  about 
the  place  where  the  shoals  may  appear,  about  the 
best  date  for  the  expedition,  and  they  give  their  orders 
and  instructions  accordingly.  Those  in  charge  of  the 
overseas  expeditions  called  Kula  are  often  supposed 
to  have  dreams  about  the  success  of  their  ceremonial 
trading.  Above  all  the  magicians  have  dreams  associ- 
ated with  the  performance  of  their  magic.  There  is 
also  another  form  of  typical  or  traditional  dream 
associated  with  magic,  that,  namely,  which  comes 
about  as  the  direct  result  of  a  spell  or  of  a  rite.  Thus,  in 
the  ceremonial  overseas  trading  there  is  a  certain  spell 
which  acts  directly  on  the  mind  of  the  partner,  induces 
in  him  a  dream,  and  this  dream  makes  the  partner 
desire  the  exchange.  Most  love  magic  is  supposed 
to  produce  a  dream  which  awakens  the  amorous  wish. 


94  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

Thus  these  natives,  remarkably  enough,  reverse  the 
Freudian  theory  of,  dreams,  for  to  them  the  dream  is 
the  cause  of  the  wish,^  In  reahty,  this  class  of  traditional 
dreams  is  very  much  within  the  lines  of  the  Freudian 
theory.  For  they  are  constructed  as  a  projection  on 
to  the  victim  of  the  magician's  own  desire.  The  victim 
of  love  magic  feels  in  her  dream  an  itching,  a  craving 
which  is  the  same  as  the  state  of  mind  of  the  performer 
of  the  magic.  The  Kula  partner  under  the  influence  of 
magic  is  supposed  to  dream  of  glorious  scenes  of 
exchange  which  form  the  very  vision  dominating  the 
wishes  of  the  performer. 

Nor  are  such  dreams  merely  spoken  of  and  only 
supposed  to  exist.  Very  frequently  the  magician  him- 
self would  come  and  tell  me  that  he  had  dreamt  about 
a  good  yield  in  fishing,  and  would  organize  an  expedition 
on  the  strength  of  it.  Or  a  garden  wizard  would  speak 
of  a  dream  he  had  had  about  a  long  drought,  and  there- 
fore order  certain  things  to  be  done.  During  the 
annual  ceremonial  feast  in  honour  of  dead  ancestors  I 
had  on  two  occasions  opportunities  of  noting  dreams 
of  natives.  In  both  cases  the  dream  referred  to  the 
proceedings,  and  in  one  the  dreamer  claimed  to  have 
dreamt  that  he  had  had  a  conversation  with  the  spirits, 
who  were  not  satisfied  with  things.    Another  class  of 


^  Cf.  also  my  Argonauts  of  the  Western  Pacific,  chapter  on  magic 
and  detailed  descriptions  of  the  rites  and  spells  in  the  course  of 
the  narrative. 


THE     MIRROR     OF     TRADITION  95 

typical  dream  is  concerned  with  the  birth  of  babies. 
In  these  the  future  mother  has  a  sort  of  dream  annuncia- 
tion from  one  of  her  dead  relatives.^ 

Now  one  of  the  typical  or  official  dreams  is  the  sexual 
dream,  which  interests  us  here  more  especially.  A  man 
will  dream  that  a  woman  visits  him  at  night  ;  in 
dream  he  will  have  congress  with  her,  and  he  will 
awake  finding  the  discharge  of  semen  on  the  mat. 
This  he  will  conceal  from  his  wife,  but  he  will 
try  to  follow  up  the  dream  actively  in  real  life  and 
initiate  an  intrigue  with  the  woman.  For  this  dream 
means  that  she  who  visited  him  had  performed  love 
magic  and  that  she  desires  him. 

About  such  dreams  I  had  a  number  of  personal 
confidences,  followed  by  the  story  of  the  subsequent 
efforts  of  the  man  at  establishing  an  intrigue  with  his 
dream  visitor. 

Now,  naturally,  as  soon  as  I  was  told  by  the  natives 
about  their  erotic  dreams,  I  was  at  once  keenly  on  the 
scent  of  incestuous  dreams.  To  the  question  :  "  Do 
you  ever  dream  of  your  mother  in  this  way  ?  "  the 
answer  would  be  a  calm,  unshocked  negation.  "  The 
mother  is  forbidden — only  a  tonagowa  (imbecile)  would 
dream  such  a  thing.  She  is  an  old  woman.  No  such 
thing  would  happen."  But  whenever  the  question 
would  be  put  about  the  sister,  the  answer  would  be  quite 

^  Cf,  '  Baloma  ' — article  in  the  Journal  of  the  R.  Anthrop.  Inst., 
1916. 


96  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

different,  with  a  strong  affective  reaction.  Of  course  I 
knew  enough  never  to  ask  such  a  question  directly  of 
a  man,  and  never  to  discuss  it  in  company.  But  even 
asking  in  the  form  of  whether  '  other  people  '  could 
ever  have  such  dreams,  the  reaction  would  be  that  of 
indignation  and  anger.  Sometimes  there  would  be  no 
answer  at  all ;  after  an  embarrassed  pause  another 
subject  would  be  taken  up  by  the  informant.  Some, 
again,  would  deny  it  seriously,  others  vehemently  and 
angrily.  But,  working  out  the  question  bit  by  bit  with 
my  best  informants,  the  truth  at  last  appeared,  and  I 
found  that  the  real  state  of  opinion  is  different.  It  is 
actually  well  known  that  '  other  people  '  have  such 
dreams — "  a  man  is  sometimes  sad,  ashamed,  and  ill- 
tempered.  Why  ?  Because  he  has  dreamt  that  he  had 
connection  with  his  sister."  "  This  made  me  feel 
ashamed,"  such  a  man  would  say.  I  found  that  this  is, 
in  fact,  one  of  the  typical  dreams  known  to  exist, 
occurring  frequently,  and  one  which  haunts  and 
disturbs  the  dreamer.  That  this  is  so,  we  will  find 
confirmed  by  other  data,  especially  in  myth  and  legend. 
Again,  the  brother-sister  incest  is  the  most  repre- 
hensible form  of  breach  of  the  rules  of  exogamy — 
which  institution  makes  it  illicit  to  have  connection  with 
any  woman  of  the  same  clan.  But  though  the  brother- 
sister  incest  is  regarded  with  the  utmost  horror,  a 
breach  of  clan  exogamy  is  a  thing  both  smart  and 
desirable,  owing  to  the  piquant  difficulties  in  carrying 


THE     MIRROR     OF    TRADITION  97 

it  out.  In  accordance  with  this,,  dreams  about  clan 
incest  are  very  frequent.  Thus,  comparing  the  different 
types  of  incestuous  dreams,  there  is  every  reason  to 
assume  that  the  mother  hardly  ever  appears  in  them 
and,  if  she  does,  these  dreams  leave  no  deep  impression  ; 
that  the  more  distant  female  relatives  are  dreamt  of 
frequently,  and  that  the  impression  left  is  pleasant ; 
while  incestuous  dreams  about  the  sister  occur  and 
leave  a  deep  and  painful  memory.  This  is  what  might 
have  been  expected,  for,  as  we  saw  when  following  the 
development  of  their  sexuality,  there  is  no  temptation 
in  the  case  of  the  mother,  a  violent  and  strongly 
repressed  one  towards  the  sister,  and  a  spicy,  not  very 
repressed  prohibition  about  the  clans  woman. 

Brother  and  sister  inces.t  is  regarded  with  such 
horror  by  the  natives  that  at  first  an  observer,  even  well 
acquainted  with  their  Ufe,  would  confidently  affirm 
that  it  would  never  occur,  though  a  Freudian  might 
have  his  suspicions.  And  these,  on  closer  search,  would 
be  found  fully  justified.  Incest  between  brother  and 
sister  existed  even  in  olden  days,  and  there  are  certain 
family  scandals  told  especially  about  the  ruhng  clan  of 
the  Malasi.  Nowadays,  when  the  ancient  morals  and 
institutions  break  down  under  the  influence  of  spurious 
Christian  morality  and  the  white  man's  so-called  law 
and  order  is  introduced,  the  passions  repressed  by 
tribal  tradition  break  through  even  more  violently 
and  openly.     I  have  three  or  four  cases  on  record  in 


98  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

which  public  opinion  definitely,  though  in  whispered 
undertones,  accused  a  brother  of  incestuous  relations 
with  his  sister.  One  case,  however,  stands  out,  for  it 
was  a  lasting  intrigue  famous  for  its  effrontery,  for  the 
notorious  character  of  the  hero  and  heroine,  and  for 
the  scandalous  stories  spun  around  it. 

Mokadayu,  of  Okopukopu,  was  a  famous  singer. 
Like  all  of  his  profession,  he  was  no  less  renowned  for 
his  success  with  ladies.  "  For,"  say  the  natives, 
"  the  throat  is  a  long  passage  like  the  wila  (vagina), 
and  the  two  attract  each  other."  "  A  man  who  has 
a  beautiful  voice  will  like  women  very  much  and  they 
will  like  him."  Many  stories  are  told  of  how  he  slept 
with  all  the  wives  of  the  chief  in  Olivilevi,  how  he 
seduced  this  and  that  married  woman.  For  a  time, 
Mokadayu  had  a  brilliant  and  very  lucrative  career 
as  a  spiritualistic  medium,  extraordinary  phenomena 
happening  in  his  hut,  especially  dematerializations  of 
various  valuable  objects  thus  transported  to  the  spirit 
land.  But  he  was  unmasked,  and  it  was  proved  that 
the  dematerialized  objects  had  merely  remained  in  his 
own  possession. 

Then  there  came  about  the  dramatic  incident  of  his 
incestuous  love  with  his  sister.  She  was  a  very  beautiful 
girl,  and,  being  a  Trobriander,  she  had,  of  course,  many 
lovers.  Suddenly  she  withdrew  all  her  favours  and 
became  chaste.  The  youth  of  the  village,  who  confided 
to   each   other   their   banishment   from   her   favours. 


THE     MIRROR     OF    TRADITION  99 

decided  to  find  out  what  was  the  matter.  It  soon 
appeared  that,  whoever  might  be  the  privileged  rival, 
the  scene  must  be  laid  in  her  parental  house.  One 
evening  when  both  parents  were  away,  a  hole  was  made 
in  the  thatch  and  through  it  the  discarded  lovers  saw 
a  sight  which  shocked  them  deeply  ;  brother  and  sister 
were  caught  in  flagrante  delicto.  A  dreadful  scandal 
broke  out  in  the  village,  which,  in  olden  days,  would 
certainly  have  end^ed  in  the  suicide  of  the  guilty  pair. 
Under  the  present  conditions  they  were  able  to  brave 
it  out  and  lived  in  incest  for  several  months  till  she 
married  and  left  the  village. 

Besides  the  actual  brother  and  sister  incest,  there  is, 
as  I  have  said,  a  breach  of  exogamous  rules  which  is 
called  suvasova.  A  woman  of  the  same  clan  is  for- 
bidden to  a  man  under  the  penalty  of  shame  and  an 
eruption  of  boils  all  over  the  body.  Against  this  second 
ailment  there  is  a  magic,  which,  as  many  of  my 
informants  told  me  with  a  self-satisfied  smirk,  is 
absolutely  efficacious.  The  moral  shame  of  such 
incidents  is  in  reality  small,  and  as  with  many  other 
rules  of  official  morality,  he  who  breaks  it  is  a  smart 
fellow.  A  young  man  who  is  a  read  Don  Juan,  and  who 
has  a  good  conceit  of  himself,  will  scorn  the  unmarried 
girls,  and  try  always  to  have  an  intrigue  with  a  married 
woman,  especially  a  chief's  wife,  or  else  commit  acts 
of  suvasova.  The  expression  '  suvasova  yoku ', 
"  Oh,    thou    exogamy    breaker  !  "  sounds  something 


100  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

like,  "  Oh,  you  gay  dog  !  "  and  is  a  facetious  com- 
pliment. 

To  complete  the  picture,  the  negative  evidence  may 
be  stated  here  that  not  one  single  case  of  mother-son 
incest  could  be  found,  not  even  a  suspicion  of  it,  though 
the  loudness  and  stringency  of  the  taboo  is  by  no  means 
so  great  as  in  the  brother-sister  incest.  In  the  summary 
given  above  of  the  typical  family  sentiments  among  the 
Trobrianders,  I  have  stated  that  the  relations  between 
father  and  daughter  are  the  only  ones  built  up  on  the 
same  pattern  as  in  a  patriarchal  society.  As  could  be 
expected  therefore,  father-daughter  incest  is  of  by  no 
means  rare  occurrence.  Two  or  three  cases  in  which 
there  seem  to  be  no  doubt  whatever  are  on  record. 
One  of  them  concerned  a  girl,  who,  besides  her  relations 
with  her  father,  was  the  sweetheart  of  a  local  boy  then 
in  my  service.  He  wanted  to  marry  her,  and  appealed 
to  me  for  financial  and  moral  support  in  this  enterprise  ; 
I  therefore  had  full  details  of  the  incest,  which  left  me 
in  no  doubt  whatever  about  the  relationship  and  its 
long  duration. 

So  far  we  have  spoken  about  the  sexual  taboo  and 
the  repressed  wish  to  break  it,  which  finds  expression 
in  dreams,  in  acts  of  crime  and  passion.  There  is, 
however,  another  relation  fraught  with  repressed 
criminal  desires,  that  of  a  man  towards  his  matriarch, 
the  brother  of  his  mother.  With  regard  to  dreams, 
there  is  one  interesting  fact  to  be  noted  here  :    the 


THE    MIRROR     OF    TRADITION        loi 

belief,  namely,  that  in  prophetic  dreams  of  death  it 
will  always  be  a  veyola  (real  kinsman),  usually  the 
sister's  son,  who  will  foredream  his  uncle's  death. 
Another  important  fact  belonging  to  the  sphere  of 
action  and  not  of  dreams  is  connected  with  witchcraft. 
A  man  who  has  acquired  the  black  magic  of  disease 
must  choose  his  first  victim  from  among  his  near 
maternal  relatives.  Very  often  a  man  is  said  to  choose 
his  own  mother.  So  that  when  anyone  is  known  to  be 
learning  sorcery,  his  real  kinsmen,  that  means  his 
maternal  relatives,  are  always  frightened  and  on  the 
look  out  for  personal  danger. 

In  the  chronicles  of  actual  crime,  there  are  also 
several  cases  to  be  registered,  bearing  on  our 
problem.  One  of  them  happened  in  the  village  of 
Osapola,  half  an  hour  away  from  where  I  lived  at  that 
time,  and  I  knew  the  actors  well.  There  were  three 
brothers,  the  eldest  blind.  The  youngest  one  used 
always  to  take  the  betel  nut  before  it  properly  ripened 
and  deprive  the  blind  man  of  his  share.  The  bhnd  man 
one  day  got  in  a  dreadful  fury  and,  seizing  an  axe, 
somehow  managed  to  wound  the  youngest  brother. 
The  middle  one  then  took  a  spear  and  killed  the  bhnd 
one.  He  was  sentenced  to  twelve  months'  imprison- 
ment by  the  white  resident  magistrate.  The  natives 
regarded  this  as  an  outrageous  injustice.  The  killing 
of  one  brother  by  another  is  a  purely  internal  matter, 
certainly  a  dreadful    crime    and    an    awful  tragedy, 


102  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

but  one  with  which  the  outer  world  is  in  no  way  con- 
cerned, and  it  can  only  stand  by  and  show  its  horror  and 
pity.  There  are  other  cases  of  violent  quarrels,  fights, 
and  one  or  two  more  murders  within  the  matrilineal 
family,  which  I  have  on  record. 

Of  parricide,  on  the  other  hand,  there  is  not  one  single 
case  to  be  cited.  Yet  to  the  natives,  as  I  have  said, 
parricide  would  be  no  special  tragedy,  and  would 
be  merely  a  matter  to  be  settled  with  the  father's 
own  clan. 

Apart  from  the  dramatic  events,  the  crimes  and 
tragedies  which  shake  the  tribal  order  to  its  very 
foundations,  there  are  the  small  events  which  indicate 
merely  the  boiling  of  the  passions  under  the  apparently 
firm  and  quiet  surface.  For,  as  we  saw,  society  builds 
up  its  traditional  norms  and  ideals,  and  sets  up 
trammels  and  barriers  to  safeguard  them.  Yet  these 
very  trammels  provoke  certain  emotional  reactions. 

Nothing  surprised  me  so  much  in  the  course  of  my 
sociological  researches  as  the  gradual  perception  of  an 
undercurrent  of  desire  and  inclination  running  counter 
to  the  trend  of  convention,  law  and  morals.  Mother- 
right,  the  principle  that  unity  of  kinship  exists  only 
in  the  mother  line,  and  that  this  unity  of  kinship  should 
claim  all  affection,  as  well  as  all  duties  and  loyalties, 
is  the  dictate  of  tradition.  But  in  reality  friendship  and 
affection  to  the  father,  community  of  personal  interest 
and  desires  with  him,  combined  with  the  wish  to  shake 


THE     MIRROR     OF     TRADITION         103 

off  the  exogamous  trammels  of  the  clan — these  are  the 
live  forces  which  flow  from  personal  inclination  and 
the  experiences  of  individual  life.  And  these  forces 
contribute  much  to  fan  ever-present  sparks  of  enmity 
between  brothers,  and  between  the  mother's  brother 
and  the  nephew.  So  that  in  the  real  feelings  of  the 
individual,  we  have,  so  to  speak,  a  sociological  negative 
of  the  traditional  principle  of  matriliny.^ 

^  This  point  has  been  elaborated  by  the  writer  in  Crime  and 
Custom,    1926. 


IV 

OBSCENITY  AND  MYTH 

TT  TE  now  proceed  to  the  discussion  of  folk-lore  in 
relation  to  the  typical  sentiments  of  the  matri- 
lineal  family,  and  with  this  we  enter  the  best  cultivated 
plot  on  the  boundary  of  psycho-analysis  and  anthro- 
pology. It  has  long  been  recognized  that  for  one  reason 
or  another  the  stories  related  seriously  about  ancestral 
times  and  the  narratives  told  for  amusement  correspond 
to  the  desires  of  those  among  whom  they  are  current. 
The  school  of  Freud  maintain,  moreover,  that  folk- 
lore is  especially  concerned  with  the  satisfaction  of 
repressed  wishes  by  means  of  fairy  tales  and  legends  ; 
and  that  this  is  the  case  also  \vith  proverbs,  typical 
jokes  and  sayings  and  stereotyped  modes  of  abuse. 

Let  us  begin  with  these  last.  Their  relation  to  the 
unconscious  must  not  be  interpreted  in  the  sense  that 
they  satisfy  the  repressed  cravings  of  the  person  abused, 
or  even  of  the  abuser.  For  instance,  the  expression 
widely  current  among  oriental  races  and  many  savages, 
'  eat  excrement,'  as  well  as  in  a  slightly  modified  form 
among  the  Latins,  satisfies  directly  the  wish  of  neither. 
Indirectly  it  is  only  meant  to  debase  and  disgust  the 
person  thus  addressed.     Every  form  of  abuse  or  bad 

104 


THE     MIRROR    OF    TRADITION        105 

language  contains  certain  propositions  fraught  with 
strong  emotional  possibilities.  Some  bring  into  play 
emotions  of  disgust  and  shame  ;  others  again  draw 
attention  to,  or  impute,  certain  actions  which  are 
considered  abominable  in  a  given  society,  and  thus 
wound  the  feelings  of  the  listener.  Here  belongs 
blasphemy,  which  in  European  culture  reaches  its 
zenith  of  perfection  and  complexity  in  the  innumerable 
variations  of  '  Me  cago  en  Dios ! '  pullulating  wherever 
the  sonorous  Spanish  is  spoken.  Here,  also,  belong 
all  the  various  abuses  by  reference  to  social  position, 
despised  or  degraded  occupations,  criminal  habits, 
and  the  like,  all  of  them  very  interesting  sociologically, 
for  they  indicate  what  is  considered  the  lowest  depth 
of  degradation  in  that  culture. 

The  incestuous  type  of  swearing,  in  which  the  person 
addressed  is  invited  to  have  connection  with  a  forbidden 
relative,  usually  the  mother,  is  in  Europe  the  speciahty 
of  the  Slavonic  nations,  among  whom  the  Russians 
easily  take  the  lead,  with  the  numerous  combinations 
of  '  Yob  twayu  mat  '  ('  Have  connection  viith  thy 
mother').  This  type  of  swearing  interests  us  most, 
because  of  its  subject,  and  because  it  plays  an  important 
part  in  the  Trobriands.  The  natives  there  have  three 
incestuous  expressions  :  '  Kwoy  inani' — '  Cohabit  with 
thy  mother  '  ;  '  Kwoy  lumuta  ' — '  cohabit  with  thy 
sister  '  ;  and  '  Kwoy  um  kwava  ' — '  cohabit  with  thy 
wife.'     The  combination  of  the  three  sayings  is  curious 


io6  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

in  itself,  for  we  see,  side  by  side,  the  most  lawful  and 
the  most  illicit  types  of  intercourse  used  for  the  same 
purpose  of  offending  and  hurting.  The  gradation  of 
intensity  is  still  more  remarkable.  For  while  the 
invitation  to  maternal  incest  is  but  a  mild  term  used 
in  chaff  or  as  a  joke,  as  we  might  say,  '  Oh,  go  to 
Jericho  ',  the  mention  of  sister  incest  in  abuse  is  a 
most  serious  offence,  and  one  used  only  when  real 
anger  is  aroused.  But  the  worst  insult,  one  which  I 
have  known  to  be  seriously  used  at  the  most  twice, 
and  once,  indeed,  it  was  among  the  causes  of  the 
incident  of  fratricide  described  above,  is  the  imperative 
to  have  connection  with  the  wife.  This  expression 
is  so  bad  that  I  learnt  of  its  existence  only  after  a  long 
sojourn  in  the  Trobriands,  and  no  native  would 
pronounce  it  but  in  whispers,  or  consent  to  make  any 
jokes  about  that  incongruous  mode  of  abuse. 

What  is  the  psychology  of  this  gradation  ?  It  is 
obvious  that  it  stands  in  no  distinct  relation  to  the 
enormity  or  unpleasantness  of  the  act.  The  maternal 
incest  is  absolutely  and  completely  out  of  the  question, 
yet  it  is  the  mildest  abuse.  Nor  can  the  criminality 
of  the  action  be  the  reason  for  the  various  strengths  of 
the  swearing,  for  the  least  criminal,  in  fact  the  lawful 
connection,  is  the  most  offensive  when  imputed.  The 
real  cause  is  the  plausibility  and  the  reality  of  the  act, 
and  the  feeUng  of  shame,  anger,  and  social  degradation 
at  the  barriers  of  etiquette  being  pulled  down  and  the 


THE     MIRROR     OF    TRADITION         107 

naked  reality  brought  to  light.  For  the  sexual  intimacy 
between  husband  and  wife  is  masked  by  a  most  rigid 
etiquette,  not  so  strict  of  course  as  that  between 
brother  and  sister,  but  directly  aiming  at  the  elimina- 
tion of  any  suggestive  modes  of  behaviour.  Sexual 
jokes  and  indecencies  must  not  be  pronounced  in  the 
company  of  the  two  consorts.  And  to  drag  out  the 
personal,  direct  sexuality  of  the  relation  in  coarse 
language  is  a  mortal  offence  to  the  sensitiveness  of  the 
Trobrianders.  This  psychology  is  extremely  interesting, 
just  because  it  discloses  that  one  of  the  main  forces  of 
abuse  lies  in  the  relation  between  the  reality  and 
plausibility  of  a  desire  or  action  and  its  conventional 
repressions. 

The  relation  between  the  abuse  by  mother  and  by 
sister  incest  is  made  clear  by  the  same  psychology. 
Its  strength  is  measured  mainly  by  the  likehhood  of 
reality  corresponding  to  the  imputation.  The  idea  of 
mother  incest  is  as  repugnant  to  the  native  as  sister 
incest,  probably  even  more.  But  just  because,  as  we 
saw,  the  whole  development  of  the  relationship  and  of 
sexual  life  makes  incestuous  temptations  of  the  mother 
almost  absent,  while  the  taboo  against  the  sister  is 
imposed  with  great  brutality  and  kept  up  with  rigid 
strength,  the  real  inclination  to  break  the  strong  taboo 
is  much  more  actual.  Hence  this  abuse  wounds  to  the 
quick. 

There  is  nothing  to  be  said  about  proverbs  in  the 


io8  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

Trobriands,  for  they  do  not  exist.  As  to  the  typical 
sayings  and  other  linguistic  uses,  I  shall  mention  here 
the  important  fact  of  the  word  luguta,  my  sister,  being 
used  in  magic  as  a  word  which  signifies  incompatibility 
and  mutual  repulsion. 

We  pass  now  to  myth  and  legend,  that  is,  to  the  stories 
told  with  a  serious  purpose  in  explanation  of  things, 
institutions,  and  customs.  To  make  the  survey  of  this 
very  extensive  and  rich  material  clear  yet  rapid,  we 
shall  classify  these  stories  into  three  categories : 
(i)  Myths  of  the  origin  of  man,  and  of  the  general 
order  of  society,  and  especially  totemic  divisions  and 
social  ranks  ;  (2)  Myths  of  cultural  change  and  achieve- 
ments which  contain  stories  about  heroic  deeds,  about 
the  establishment  of  customs,  cultural  features  and 
social  institutions  ;  (3)  Myths  associated  with  definite 
forms  of  magic. ^ 

The  matrilineal  character  of  the  culture  meets  us  at 
once  in  the  first  class,  that  is,  in  the  myths  about  the 
origins  of  man,  of  the  social  order,  especially  chieftain- 
ship and  totemic  divisions,  and  of  the  various  clans 
and  sub-clans.  These  myths,  which  are  numerous,  for 
every  locality  has  its  own  legends  or  variations,  form 
a  sort  of  connected  cycle.  They  all  agree  that  human 
beijUgs  have  emerged  from  underground  through  holes 
in  the  earth.     Every  sub-clan  has  its  own  place  of 

^  Cf.  the  chapter  on  Mythology  in  Argonauts  of  the  Western  Pacific, 
especially  pp.  304  sqq. 


THE     MIRROR    OF    TRADITION        109 

emergence,  and  the  events  which  happened  on  this 
momentous  occasion  determined  sometimes  the 
privileges  or  disabilities  of  the  sub-clan.  What  interests 
us  most  in  them  is  that  the  first  ancestral  groups  whose 
appearance  is  mentioned  in  the  myth  consist  always 
of  a  woman,  sometimes  accompanied  by  her  brother, 
sometimes  by  the  totemic  animal,  but  never  by  a 
husband.  In  some  of  the  myths  the  mode  of  propagating 
of  the  first  ancestress  is  explicitly  described.  She  starts 
the  line  of  her  descendants  by  imprudent  exposure  to 
the  rain  or,  lying  in  a  grotto,  is  pierced  by  the  dripping 
of  the  stalactites  ;  or  bathing  she  is  bitten  by  a  fish. 
She  is  '  opened  up  '  in  this  way,  and  a  spirit  child 
enters  her  womb  and  she  becomes  pregnant.^  Thus 
instead  of  the  creative  force  of  a  father,  the  mjrths 
reveal  the  spontaneous  procreative  powers  of  the 
ancestral  mother. 

Nor  is  there  any  other  role  in  which  the  father 
appears.  In  fact,  he  is  never  mentioned,  and  does  not 
exist  in  any  part  of  the  mythological  world.    Most  of 

^  Freudians  will  be  interested  in  the  psychology  of  symbolism 
underlying  these  myths.  It  must  be  noted  that  the  natives  have  no 
idea  whatever  of  the  fertilizing  influence  of  the  male  semen,  but  they 
know  that  a  virgin  cannot  conceive,  and  that  to  become  a  mother  a 
woman  has  to  be  '  opened  up  '  as  they  express  it.  This  in  the  every- 
day life  of  the  village  is  done  at  an  early  age  by  the  appropriate  organ. 
In  the  myth  of  the  primeval  ancestress,  where  the  husband  or  any 
sexually  eligible  male  companion  is  excluded,  some  natural  object 
is  selected,  such  as  a  fish  or  a  stalactite.  Cf.  for  further  material 
on  this  subject  my  article  in  Psyche,  Oct.,  1923,  reprinted  as  The 
Father  in  Primitive  Psychology,  1927. 


no  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

these  local  myths  have  come  down  in  very  rudimentary 
form,  some  containing  only  one  incident  or  an  affirma- 
tion of  right  and  privilege.  Those  of  them  which 
contain  a  conflict  or  a  dramatic  incident,  elements 
essential  in  ungarbled  myth,  depict  invariably  a 
matriUneal  family  and  the  drama  happening  within  it. 
There  is  a  quarrel  between  two  brothers  which  makes 
them  separate,  each  taking  his  sister.  Or,  again,  in 
another  myth,  two  sisters  set  out,  disagree,  separate 
and  found  two  different  communities. 

In  a  myth  which  might  perhaps  be  classed  in  this 
group,  and  which  accounts  for  the  loss  of  immortahty, 
or,  to  put  it  more  correctly,  of  perpetual  youth  by 
human  beings,  it  is  the  quarrel  between  grandmother 
and  granddaughter  which  brings  about  the  catastrophe. 
Matrihny — in  the  fact  that  descent  is  reckoned  by  the 
female — mother-right — in  the  great  importance  of  the 
part  played  by  women,  the  matriarchal  configuration 
of  kinship,  in  the  dissensions  of  brothers — in  short,  the 
pattern  of  the  matrihneal  family,  is  evident  in  the 
structure  of  myths  of  this  category.  There  is  not  a 
single  myth  of  origins  in  which  a  husband  or  a  father 
plays  any  part,  or  even  makes  his  appearance.  That  the 
matrihneal  nature  of  the  mythological  drama  is  closely 
associated  with  the  matrihneal  repressions  within  the 
family  should  need  no  further  argument  to  convince 
a  psycho-analyst. 

Let  us  now  turn  to  the  second  class  of  myths,  those 


THE     MIRROR     OF     TRADITION         iii 

referring  to  certain  big  cultural  achievements  brought 
about  by  heroic  deeds  and  important  adventures.  This 
class  of  myth  is  less  rudimentary,  consists  of  long  cycles, 
and  develops  pronouncedly  dramatic  incidents.  The 
most  important  cycle  of  this  category  is  the  myth  of 
Tudava,  a  hero  bom  of  a  virgin  who  was  pierced  by  the 
action  of  stalactite  water.  The  deeds  of  this  hero  are 
celebrated  in  a  number  of  myths,  which  differ  slightly 
according  to  the  district  in  which  they  are  found,  and 
which  ascribe  to  him  the  introduction  of  agriculture 
and  the  institution  of  a  number  of  customs  and  moral 
rules,  though  his  own  moral  character  is  very  weakly 
developed.  The  main  deed  of  this  hero,  however,  the 
one  known  all  over  the  district,  and  forming  the  bedrock 
of  all  the  myths,  is  the  slaying  of  an  ogre.  The  story 
runs  as  follows  : — 

Humanity  led  a  happy  existence  in  the  Trobriand 
Archipelago.  Suddenly  a  dreadful  ogre  called 
Dokonikan  made  his  appearance  in  the  eastern 
part  of  the  islands.  He  fed  on  human  flesh  and 
gradually  consumed  one  community  after  another. 
At  the  north-western  end  of  the  island  in  the  village  of 
Laba'i  there  lived  at  that  time  a  family  consisting  of 
a  sister  and  her  brothers.  When  Dokonikan  ranged 
nearer  and  nearer  to  Laba'i  the  family  decided  to  fly. 
The  sister,  however,  at  that  moment  wounded  her  foot 
and  was  unable  to  move.  She  was  therefore  abandoned 
by  her  brothers,  who  left  her  with  her  little  son  in  a 


112  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

grotto  on  the  beach  of  Laba'i,  and  sailed  away  in 
a  canoe  to  the  south-west.  The  boy  was  brought  up 
by  his  mother,  who  taught  him  first  the  choice  of  proper 
wood  for  a  strong  spear,  then  instructed  him  in  the 
Kwoygapani  magic  which  steals  away  a  man's  under- 
standing. The  hero  sallied  forth,  and  after  having 
bewitched  Dokonikan  with  the  Kwoygapani  magic, 
killed  him  and  cut  off  his  head.  After  that  he  and  his 
mother  prepared  a  taro  pudding,  in  which  they  hid 
and  baked  the  head  of  the  ogre.  With  this  gruesome 
dish  Tudava  sailed  away  in  search  of  his  mother's 
brother.  When  he  found  him  he  gave  him  the  pudding, 
in  which  the  uncle  with  horror  and  dismay  found  the 
head  of  Dokonikan.  Seized  with  fear  and  remorse,  the 
mother's  brother  offered  his  nephew  all  sorts  of  gifts 
in  atonement  for  having  abandoned  him  and  his  mother 
to  the  ogre.  The  hero  refused  ever5rthing,  and  was  only 
appeased  after  he  had  received  his  uncle's  daughter  in 
marriage.  After  that  he  set  out  again  and  performed 
a  number  of  cultural  deeds,  which  do  not  interest  us 
further  in  this  context. 

In  this  myth  there  are  two  conflicts  which  set  the 
drama  in  motion  :  first  the  cannibalistic  appetite  of 
the  ogre,  and  second  the  abandonment  of  mother  and 
son  by  the  maternal  uncle.  The  second  is  a  typical 
matrilineal  drama,  and  corresponds  distinctly  to  the 
natural  tendency,  repressed  by  tribal  morals  and 
custom,  as  we  have  found  it  in  our  analysis  of  the 


THE     MIRROR     OF    TRADITION         113 

matrilineal  family  in  the  Trobriands.  For  the  mother's 
brother  is  the  appointed  guardian  of  her  and  her  family. 
Yet  this  is  a  duty  which  both  weighs  heavily  upon  him, 
and  is  not  always  gratefully  and  pleasantly  received  by 
his  wards.  Thus  it  is  characteristic  that  the  opening 
of  the  most  important  heroic  drama  in  mythology 
should  be  associated  with  a  capital  sin  of  the 
matriarch's  neglect  of  his  duty. 

But  this  second  matriarchal  conflict  is  not  altogether 
independent  of  the  first.  When  Dokonikan  is  killed 
his  head  is  presented  in  a  dish  of  wood  to  the  maternal 
uncle.  If  it  were  only  to  frighten  him  by  the  sight  of 
the  monster,  there  would  be  no  point  in  disguising  the 
head  in  the  taro  pudding.  Moreover,  since  Dokonikan 
was  the  general  enemy  of  humanity,  the  sight  of  his 
head  should  have  filled  the  uncle  with  joy.  The  whole 
setting  of  this  incident  and  the  emotion  which  underlies 
it,  receive  meaning  only  if  we  assume  that  there  is  some 
sort  of  association  or  connivance  between  the  ogre 
and  the  uncle.  In  that  case,  to  give  one  cannibal's 
head  to  be  eaten  by  the  other  is  just  the  right  sort  of 
punishment,  and  the  story  contains  then  in  reality  one 
villain  and  one  conflict  distributed  over  two  stages  and 
duplicated  into  two  persons.  Thus  we  see  that  the 
legend  of  Tudava  contains  a  typical  matrilineal  drama 
which  forms  its  core,  and  which  is  brought  to  a  logical 
conclusion.  I  shall  remain  satisfied,  therefore,  with 
having     pointed     out     those     features     which     are 


114  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

indisputable,  and  are  clearly  contained  in  the  facts 
themselves,  and  I  shall  not  enter  in  detail  into  further 
interpretations  of  this  myth,  which  would  necessitate 
certain  historical  and  mythological  hypotheses.  But 
I  wish  to  suggest  that  the  figure  of  Dokonikan  is  not 
altogether  explained  by  his  association  with  the 
matriarch,  that  he  may  be  a  figure  handed  from  a 
patriarchal  culture  into  a;  matriarchal  one,  in  which 
case  he  might  represent  the  father  and  husband.  If 
this  be  so,  the  present  legend  would  be  extremely 
interesting  in  showing  how  the  prevalent  cast  of  a 
culture  moulds  and  transforms  persons  and  situations 
to  fit  them  into  its  own  sociological  context. 

Another  incident  in  this  myth  which  I  shall  only 
indicate  here,  is  the  marriage  at  the  end  of  the  story 
of  the  hero  to  his  maternal  cross-cousin.  This,  in  the 
present  kinship  system  of  the  natives,  is  considered 
distinctly  an  improper  thing,  though  not  actually 
incestuous. 

Passing  to  another  legendary  cycle,  we  have  the  story 
of  two  brothers  who  quarrel  over  a  garden  plot — as  so 
often  happens  in  real  life — and  in  this  quarrel  the 
elder  kills  the  younger.  The  myth  does  not  relate  any 
compunction  for  this  act.  It  describes,  instead,  in 
detail  the  culinary  anti-climax  of  the  drama  ;  the  elder 
brother  digs  a  hole  in  the  ground,  brings  stones,  leaves 
and  firewood,  and,  as  if  he  had  just  killed  a  pig  or  hauled 
out  a  big  fish,  he  proceeds  to  bake  his  brother  in  an 


THE     MIRROR     OF     TRADITION         115 

earthen  oven.  Then  he  hawks  the  baked  flesh  about 
from  one  village  to  another,  rebaking  it  from  time  to 
time  when  his  olfactory  sense  indicates  the  necessity 
of  such  a  procedure.  Those  communities  which  decline 
his  offer  remain  non-cannibalistic  ;  those  which  accept 
become  flesh-eaters  ever  afterwards.  Thus  here 
cannibaUsm  is  traced  to  a  fratricidal  act,  and  to 
preference  or  dislike  for  a  food  thus  criminally  and 
sinfully  obtained.  Needless  to  say,  this  is  the  myth  of 
the  non-cannibalistic  tribes  only.  The  same  difference 
between  cannibalism  and  its  absence  is  explained 
by  the  man-eating  natives  of  Dobu  and  the  other 
cannibalistic  districts  of  the  d'Entrecasteaux  Islands 
by  a  story  in  which  cannibalism  is  certainly  not  branded 
as  anything  unpleasant.  This  story  also,  however,  con- 
sists in  a  difference,  if  not  in  an  actual  quarrel  between 
two  brothers  and  two  sisters.^  What  mainly  interests 
us  in  these  myths  is  the  matrilineal  imprint  which 
they  possess  in  the  quarrel  between  elder  and  younger 
brother. 

The  myth  about  the  origins  of  fire,  which  also 
contains  a  brief  mention  of  the  origins  of  sun  and  moon, 
describes  dissension  between  two  sisters.  It  may  be 
added  that  fire  in  this  myth  is  described  as  originating 
in  a  woman's  sexual  organs. 


*  These  myths  have  already  been   given   in   Argonauts   of  the 
Western  Pacific.  Chapter  on  '  Mythology  ',  pp.  321-331-332. 


ii6  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

The  reader  accustomed  to  psycho-analytic  inter- 
pretations of  myth  and  to  psychological  and 
anthropological  writings  on  the  subject  in  general,  will 
find  all  my  remarks  singularly  simple  and  un- 
sophisticated. All  that  is  said  here  is  clearly  written 
on  the  surface  of  the  myth,  and  I  have  hardly  attempted 
any  complicated  or  symbolic  interpretation.  This, 
however,  I  refrained  from  doing  on  purpose.  For  the 
thesis  here  developed  that  in  a  matriarchal  society  myth 
will  contain  conflicts  of  a  specifically  matrilineal  nature 
is  better  served  if  supported  only  by  unquestionable 
argiunents.  Moreover,  if  I  am  right,  and  if  our 
sociological  point  of  view  brings  us  really  one  step 
nearer  towards  the  correct  interpretation  of  myth, 
then  it  is  clear  that  we  need  not  rely  so  much  on 
roundabout  or  symbolic  reinterpretations  of  facts, 
but  can  confidently  let  the  facts  speak  for  themselves. 
It  will  be  obvious  to  any  attentive  reader  that  many  of 
the  situations  which  we  understand  as  direct  results 
of  the  matrilineal  complex  could,  by  artificial  and 
symbolic  rehandling,  be  made  to  correspond  to  a 
patriarchal  outlook.  The  conflict  between  mother's 
brother  and  nephew,  who  should  be  natural  protectors 
and  always  keep  common  cause,  but  who  often  in 
reality  regard  each  other  as  one  ogre  might  another, 
the  fight  and  cannibaUstic  violence  between  two 
brothers,  who  in  tribal  law  form  one  body,  all  this 
corresponds  roughly  to  analogous  conflicts  within  a 


THE     MIRROR     OF     TRADITION         117 

patriarchal  family.  And  it  is  just  the  difference  in  the 
actors,  in  the  cast  of  the  play,  which  distinguishes  the 
matriarchal  from  the  patriarchal  myth.  It  is  the 
sociological  point  of  view  of  the  tragedy  which  differs. 
The  foundations  of  the  psycho-analytic  explanations  of 
myth  we  have  in  no  way  shaken.  We  have  merely 
corrected  the  sociology  of  this  interpretation.  That  this 
correction,  however,  is  of  extreme  importance,  and  even 
bears  upon  fundamental  psychological  problems,  has, 
I  trust,  been  made  sufficiently  clear. 

Let  us  pass  now  to  the  third  class  of  myth,  that 
which  we  find  at  the  basis  of  cultural  achievement 
and  magic.  Magic  plays  an  extremely  important 
part  in  everything  which  these  natives  do.  When- 
ever they  approach  any  subject  which  is  of  vital 
importance  to  them  and  in  which  they  cannot  rely 
solely  on  their  own  forces,  they  summon  magic 
to  their  aid.  To  master  wind  and  weather,  to  ward 
off  dangers  in  saihng,  to  secure  success  in  love, 
ceremonial  trading  or  dancing,  the  natives  perform 
magic.  Black  magic  and  magic  of  health  play  a  very 
great  role  in  their  social  life,  and  in  the  important 
economic  activities  and  enterprises,  such  as  gardening, 
fishing,  and  the  construction  of  canoes,  magic  enters 
as  an  intrinsic  and  important  element.  Now  between 
magic  and  myth  there  exists  an  intimate  connexion. 
Most  of  the  super-normal  power  displayed  by  the  heroes 
in  myth  is  due  to  their  knowledge  of  magic.    Present 


ii8  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

humanity  differs  from  the  great  mythical  heroes 
of  the  past  in  that  nowadays  the  most  effective 
tj^es  of  magic  have  been  lost.  Could  the  strong  spells 
and  the  powerful  rites  be  recovered,  men  could  fly 
through  the  air,  rejuvenate  and  thus  retain  their  life 
for  ever,  kill  people  and  bring  them  to  life  again,  be 
always  beautiful,  successful,  loved  and  praised. 

But  it  is  not  only  myth  which  draws  its  power  from 
magic.  Magic  is  also  dependent  upon  myth.  Almost 
every  type  of  spell  and  rite  has  its  mythological 
foundation.  The  natives  tell  a  story  of  the  past  which 
explains  how  this  magic  came  into  man's  possession, 
and  which  serves  as  a  warrant  of  its  efficiency.  In 
this  lies  perhaps  the  main  sociological  influence  of 
myth.  For  myth  Hves  in  magic,  and  since  magic  shapes 
and  maintains  many  social  institutions,  myth  exercises 
its  influence  upon  them. 

Let  us  now  pass  to  a  few  concrete  examples  of  such 
myths  of  magic.  It  will  be  best  to  discuss  the  question* 
of  one  detailed  case  first,  and  for  this  I  shall  choose  the 
myth  of  the  flying  canoe  already  published  in  extenso.^ 
This  myth  is  narrated  in  connexion  with  the  ship- 
building magic  used  by  the  natives.  A  long  story  is 
told  about  a  time  when  there  existed  magic  which, 
performed  during  the  construction  of  a  canoe,  could 
make  it  fly  through  the  air.  The  hero  of  this  story,  the 
man  who  was  the  last — and  as  it  seems  also  the  first — 

^  op.  ciL,  pp.  421  sqq. 


THE     MIRROR     OF     TRADITION         119 

to  perform  it,  is  depicted  in  his  role  of  ship-builder  and 
magician.  We  are  told  how  under  his  direction  a  canoe 
is  built ;  how,  on  an  overseas  expedition  to  the  south, 
it  outruns  all  others,  flying  through  the  air  while  they 
have  to  sail ;  how  its  owner  obtains  an  overwhelming 
success  in  the  expedition.  This  is  the  happy  beginning 
of  the  story.  Now  comes  the  tragedy.  All  the  men  in 
the  community  are  jealous  and  fuU  of  hatred  against 
the  hero.  Another  incident  occurs.  He  is  in  possession 
also  of  a  successful  garden  magic,  and  of  one  by  which 
he  can  also  damage  his  neighbours.  In  a  general 
drought  his  garden  alone  survives.  Then  all  the 
men  of  his  community  determine  that  he  must  die. 
The  younger  brother  of  the  hero  had  received  from  him 
the  canoe  magic  and  the  garden  magic.  So  no  one 
thought  that  by  IdUing  the  elder  brother  they  would 
also  lose  the  magic.  The  criminal  deed  is  performed, 
and  it  is  done  not  by  any  strangers,  but  by  the  younger 
brother  of  the  hero.  In  one  of  the  versions  he  and  the 
hero's  maternal  nephews  kiU  him  in  a  joint  attack.  In 
another  version  again,  the  story  proceeds  to  tell  how, 
after  he  has  killed  his  elder  brother,  he  then  proceeds 
to  organize  the  mortuary  festivities  for  him.  The  point 
of  the  story  remains  in  the  fact  that  after  the  deed  was 
done,  and  the  younger  brother  tried  to  apply  the 
magic  to  a  canoe,  he  found  out  with  dismay  that  he  was 
not  in  possession  of  the  full  magic,  but  only  of  its  weaker 
part.   Thus  humanity  lost  the  flying  magic  for  ever. 


120  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

In  this  myth  the  matriHneal  complex  comes  power- 
fully to  the  fore.  The  hero,  whose  duty  it  is  according 
to  tribal  law  to  share  the  magic  with  his  younger 
brother  and  maternal  nephew,  cheats  them,  to  put  it 
in  plain  terms,  by  pretending  that  he  has  handed  them 
over  all  the  spells  and  rites  while  in  reality  he  only  gave 
up  an  insignificant  fraction.  The  younger  man,  on  the 
other  hand,  whose  duty  it  would  be  to  protect  his 
brother,  to  avenge  his  death,  to  share  all  his  interests, 
we  find  at  the  head  of  the  conspiracy,  red-handed 
with  fratricidal  murder. 

If  we  compare  this  mythical  situation  with  the 
sociological  reality  we  find  a  strange  correspondence. 
It  is  the  duty  of  every  man  to  hand  over  to  his  maternal 
nephew  or  younger  brother  the  hereditary  possessions 
of  the  family,  such  as  family  myth,  family  magic  and 
family  songs ;  as  well  as  the  titles  to  certain  material 
possessions  and  economic  rites.  The  handing  over  of 
magic  has  obviously  to  be  done  during  the  life-time  of 
the  elder  man.  The  cession  of  property  rights  and 
privileges  is  also  frequently  done  before  his  death.  It 
is  interesting  that  such  lawful  acquisition  by  a  man  of 
the  goods  which  are  due  to  him  by  inheritance  from  his 
maternal  uncle  or  elder  brother  has  always  to  be  done 
against  a  type  of  payment  called  pokala,  which 
frequently  is  very  substantial  indeed.  It  is  still  more 
important  to  note  that  when  a  father  gives  certain 
properties  to  his  son  he  always  does  it  for  nothing,  out 


THE     MIRROR     OF     TRADITION         121 

of  sheer  affection.  In  actual  life,  the  mythological 
swindle  of  the  younger  by  the  elder  brother  is  also 
very  often  paralleled.  There  is  always  a  feeling  of 
uncertainty,  always  a  mutual  suspicion  between  the  two 
people  who  in  tribal  law  should  be  at  one  in  common 
interests  and  reciprocal  duties  as  well  as  in  affection. 
Ever  so  often  w^hen  obtaining  magic  from  a  man,  I 
became  aware  that  he  was  himself  doubtful  whether  he 
had  not  been  cheated  out  of  some  of  it  in  receiving  it 
from  his  uncle  or  elder  brother.  Such  a  doubt  was 
never  in  the  mind  of  a  man  who  had  received  his 
magic  as  a  gift  from  the  father.  Survepng  the  people 
now  in  possession  of  important  systems  of  magic,  I 
find  also  that  more  than  half  of  the  outstanding 
younger  magicians  have  obtained  their  powers  by 
paternal  gift  and  not  by  maternal  inheritance. 

Thus  in  real  life,  as  well  as  in  myth,  we  see  that  the 
situation  corresponds  to  a  complex,  to  a  repressed 
sentiment,  and  is  at  cross  variance  with  tribal  law  and 
conventional  tribal  ideals.  According  to  law  and  morals, 
two  brothers  or  a  maternal  uncle  and  his  nephew  are 
friends,  allies,  and  have  all  feelings  and  interests  in 
common.  In  real  life  to  a  certain  degree  and  quite 
openly  in  myth,  they  are  enemies,  cheat  each  other, 
murder  each  other,  and  suspicion  and  hostihty  obtain 
rather  than  love  and  union. 

One  more  feature  in  the  canoe  m3rth  deserves  our 
attention  :  in  an  epilogue  to  the  myth  we  are  told  that 


122  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

the  three  sisters  of  the  hero  are  angry  with  the  younger 
brother  because  he  has  killed  the  elder  one  without 
learning  the  magic.  They  had  already  learnt  it, 
however,  and,  though,  being  women,  they  could  not 
build  or  sail  flying  canoes,  they  were  able  to  fly 
through  the  air  as  flying  witches.  After  the  crime  had 
been  committed  they  flew  away,  each  of  them  settling 
in  a  different  district.  In  this  episode  we  see  the 
characteristic  matrihneal  position  of  woman,  who  learns 
magic  first  before  man  has  acquired  it.  The  sisters  also 
appear  as  moral  guardians  of  the  clan,  but  their  wrath 
is  directed  not  against  the  crime,  but  against  the 
mutilation  of  clan  property.  Had  the  younger  brother 
known  the  magic  before  kiUing  the  elder,  the  three 
sisters  would  have  lived  on  happily  with  him  for  ever 
after. 

Another  fragmentary  myth  already  published 
deserves  our  attention,^  the  myth  about  the  origins 
of  salvage  magic,  in  cases  of  shipwreck.  There  were  two 
brothers,  the  elder  a  man,  the  younger  a  dog.  One  day 
the  senior  goes  on  a  fishing  expedition,  but  he  refuses 
to  take  the  younger  one  with  him.  The  dog,  who  has 
acquired  the  magic  of  safe  swimming  from  the  mother, 
follows  the  elder  one,  diving  under  water.  In  the  fishing 
the  dog  is  more  successful.  In  retahation  for  the  ill- 
treatment  received  from  the  elder  brother,  the  dog 
changes  his  clan  and  bequeaths  the  magic  to  his  adopted 

1  op.  cit.,  pp.  262-264. 


THE     MIRROR    OF    TRADITION        123 

kinsmen.  The  drama  of  this  myth  consists  first  of  all 
in  the  favouring  by  the  mother  of  the  second  son,  a 
distinctly  matrilineal  feature,  in  that  the  mother  here 
distributes  her  favours  directly,  and  does  not  need  to 
cheat  the  father  hke  her  better-known  colleague  in 
the  Bible,  the  mother  of  Esau  and  Jacob.  There  is  also 
the  typical  matriUneal  quarrel,  the  wronging  of  the 
younger  brother  by  the  elder,  and  retaliation. 

One  more  important  story  has  to  be  given  here  : 
the  legend  about  the  origin  of  love  magic,  which  forms 
the  most  telling  piece  of  evidence  with  regard  to  the 
influence  of  the  matriUneal  complex.  Among  these 
amorous  people  the  arts  of  seduction,  of  pleasing,  of 
impressing  the  other  sex,  lead  to  the  display  of  beauty, 
of  prowess,  and  of  artistic  abihties.  The  fame  of  a  good 
dancer,  of  a  good  singer,  of  a  warrior,  has  its  sexual 
side,  and  though  ambition  has  a  powerful  sway  for 
its  own  sake,  some  of  it  is  always  sacrificed  on  the  altar 
of  love.  But  above  aU  the  other  means  of  seduction  the 
prosaic  and  crude  art  of  magic  is  extensively  used,  and 
it  commands  the  supreme  respect  of  the  natives.  The 
tribal  Don  Juan  will  boast  about  his  magic  rather  than 
any  personal  qualities.  The  less  successful  swain  will 
sigh  for  magic  :  "  If  I  only  knew  the  real  Kayroiwo  " 
is  the  burden  of  the  broken  heart.  The  natives  will 
point  to  old,  ugly,  and  crippled  men  who  yet  have 
been  always  successful  in  love  by  means  of  their  magic. 

This  magic  is  not  simple.     There  is  a  series  of  acts, 


124  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

each  consisting  of  a  special  formula  and  its  rite,  which 
have  to  be  carried  out  one  after  the  other  in  order  to 
exercise  an  increasing  charm  upon  the  desired  lover. 
It  may  be  added  at  once  that  the  magic  is  carried  out 
by  girls  to  capture  an  admirer  as  well  as  by  youths  to 
subdue  a  sweetheart. 

The  initial  formula  is  associated  with  the  ritual  bathe 
in  the  sea.  A  formula  is  uttered  over  the  spongy  leaves 
which  are  used  by  the  natives  as  a  bathing  towel  to 
dry  and  rub  the  skin.  The  bather  rubs  his  skin  with  the 
bewitched  leaves,  then  throws  them  into  the  waves; 
As  the  leaves  heave  up  and  down  so  shall  the  inside  of 
the  beloved  one  be  moved  by  passion.  Sometimes  this 
formula  is  sufficient ;  if  not,  the  spurned  lover  will 
resort  to  a  stronger  one.  The  second  formula  is  chanted 
over  betel-nut,  which  the  lover  then  chews  and  spits 
out  in  the  direction  of  his  beloved.  If  even  this  should 
prove  unavailing,  a  third  formula,  stronger  than  the 
two  preceding  ones,  is  recited  over  some  dainty,  such 
as  betel-nut  or  tobacco,  and  the  morsel  is  given  to  the 
desired  one  to  eat,  chew,  or  smoke.  An  even  more 
drastic  measure  is  to  utter  the  magic  into  the  open 
palms  and  attempt  to  press  them  against  the  bosom  of 
the  beloved. 

The  last  and  most  powerful  method  might,  with- 
out pushing  the  simile  too  far,  be  described  as 
psycho-analytic.  In  fact,  long  before  Freud  had  dis- 
covered  the  predominantly  erotic  nature  of  dreams. 


THE     MIRROR     OF     TRADITION         125 

similar  theories  were  in  vogue  among  the  brown-skinned 
savages  of  north-west  Melanesia.  According  to  their 
view,  certain  forms  of  magic  can  produce  dreams.  The 
wish  engendered  in  such  dreams  penetrates  into 
waking  life  and  thus  the  dream- wish  becomes  realized. 
This  is  Freudianism  turned  upside-down ;  but  which 
theory  is  correct  and  which  is  erroneous  I  shall  not 
try  definitely  to  settle.  As  regards  love  magic,  there  is 
a  method  of  brewing  certain  aromatic  herbs  in  coconut 
oil  and  uttering  a  formula  over  them,  which  gives  them 
a  powerful  dream-inducing  property.  If  the  magic- 
maker  be  successful  in  making  the  smeU  of  this  brew 
enter  the  nostrils  of  his  beloved,  she  will  be  sure  to 
dream  of  him.  In  this  dream  she  may  have  visions  and 
undergo  experiences  which  she  will  inevitably  attempt 
to  translate  into  deeds  in  actual  life. 

Among  the  several  forms  of  love  magic  that  of  the 
sulumwoya  is  by  far  the  most  important .  A  great  potency 
is  ascribed  to  it,  and  it  commands  a  considerable 
price  if  a  native  wants  to  purchase  the  formula  and  the 
rite,  or  if  he  wants  it  to  be  performed  on  his  behalf. 
This  magic  is  locaUzed  in  two  centres.  One  of  them  lies 
on  the  eastern  shore  of  the  main  island.  A  fine  beach 
of  clean  coral  sand  overlooks  the  open  sea  towards  the 
west,  where  beyond  the  white  breakers  on  the  fringing 
reef  there  may  be  seen  on  a  clear  day  silhouettes  of 
distant  raised  coral  rocks.  Among  them  is  the  island 
of  Iwa,  the  second  centre  of  love  magic.    The  spot  on 


126  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

the  main  island,  which  is  the  bathing  and  boating  beach 
of  the  village  of  Kumilabwaga,  is  to  the  natives  almost 
like  a  holy  shrine  of  love.  There,  in  the  white  limestone 
beyond  the  fringe  of  luxuriant  vegetation  is  the 
grotto  where  the  primeval  tragedy  was  consummated  ; 
there  on  both  sides  of  the  grotto  are  the  two  springs 
which  still  possess  the  power  of  inspiring  love  by  ritual. 

A  beautiful  myth  of  magic  and  love  connects  these 
two  spots  facing  each  other  across  the  sea.  One  of  the 
most  interesting  aspects  of  this  myth  is  that  it  accounts 
for  the  existence  of  love-magic  by  what  to  the  natives 
is  a  horrible  and  tragic  event,  an  act  of  incest  between 
brother  and  sister.  In  this  the  story  shows  some  affinity 
to  the  legends  of  Tristan  and  Isolde,  Lancelot  and 
Guinevere,  Sigmund  and  Sigelinde,  as  well  as  to  a 
number  of  similar  tales  in  savage  communities. 

There  hved  in  the  village  of  Kumilabwaga  a  woman 
of  the  Malasi  clan  who  had  a  son  and  a  daughter.  One 
day  while  the  mother  was  cutting  out  her  fibre-petticoat, 
the  son,  made  some  magic  over  herbs.  This  he  did  to 
gain  the  love  of  a  certain  woman.  He  placed  some  of  the 
pungent  kwayawaga  leaves  and  some  of  the  sweet- 
scented  sulumwoya  (mint)  into  clarified  coconut  oil 
and  boiled  the  mixture,  reciting  the  spell  over  it.  Then 
he  poured  it  into  a  receptacle  made  of  toughened 
banana-leaves  and  placed  it  in  the  thatch.  He  then 
went  to  the  sea  to  bathe.  His  sister  in  the  meantime 
had  made  ready  to  go  to  the  water  hole  to  fill  the 


THE     MIRROR     OF     TRADITION         127 

coconut  bottles  with  water.  As  she  passed  under 
the  spot  where  the  magical  oil  had  been  put, 
she  brushed  against  the  receptacle  with  her  hair 
and  some  of  the  oil  dropped  down  over  her.  She 
brushed  it  off  with  her  fingers,  and  then  sniffed  at 
them.  When  she  returned  with  the  water  she  asked  her 
mother,  "  Where  is  the  man,  where  is  my  brother  ?  " 
This  according  to  native  moral  ideas  was  a  dreadful 
thing  to  do,  for  no  girl  should  inquire  about  her  brother, 
nor  should  she  speak  of  him  as  a  man.  The  mother 
guessed  what  had  happened.  She  said  to  herself  : 
"  Alas,  my  children  have  lost  their  minds." 

The  sister  ran  after  her  brother.  She  found  him  on 
the  beach  where  he  was  bathing.  He  was  without  his 
pubic  leaf.  She  loosened  her  fibre  skirt  and  naked  she 
tried  to  approach  him.  Horrified  by  this  dreadful  sight 
the  man  ran  away  along  the  beach  tiU  he  was  barred  by 
the  precipitous  rock  which  on  the  north  cuts  off  the 
Bokaraywata  beach.  He  turned  and  ran  back  to  the 
other  rock  which  stands  up  steep  and  inaccessible  at 
the  southern  end.  Thus  they  ran  three  times  along  the 
beach  under  the  shade  of  the  big  overhanging  trees  till 
the  man,  exhausted  and  overcome,  allowed  his  sister 
to  catch  hold  of  him,  and  the  two  fell  down,  embracing 
in  the  shallow  water  of  the  caressing  waves.  Then, 
ashamed  and  remorseful,  but  with  the  fire  of  their  love 
not  quenched,  they  went  to  the  grotto  of  Bokaraywata 
where  they  remained  without  food,  without  drink,  and 


128  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

without  sleep.  There  also  they  died,  clasped  in  one 
another's  arms,  and  through  their  linked  bodies  there 
grew  the  sweet-smelling  plant  of  the  native  mint 
(sulumwoya). 

A  man  in  the  island  of  Iwa  dreamt  the  kirisala,  the 
magical  dream  of  this  tragic  event.  He  saw  the  vision 
before  him.  He  woke,  and  said  :  "  The  two  are  dead 
in  the  grotto  of  Bokaraywata  and  the  sulumwoya  is 
growing  out  of  their  bodies.  I  must  go."  He  took  his 
canoe  ;  he  sailed  across  the  sea  between  his  island  and 
that  of  Kitava.  Then  from  Kitava  he  went  to  the  main 
island,  till  he  alighted  on  the  tragic  beach.  There  he 
saw  the  reef-heron  hovering  over  the  grotto.  He  went 
in  and  he  saw  the  sulumwoya  plant  growing  out  of  the 
lovers'  chests.  He  then  went  to  the  village.  The  mother 
avowed  the  shame  which  had  fallen  on  her  family. 
She  gave  him  the  magical  formula,  which  he  learned 
by  heart.  He  took  part  of  the  spell  over  to  Iwa  and  left 
part  of  it  in  Kumilabwaga.  At  the  grotto  he  plucked 
off  some  of  the  mint,  and  took  it  with  him.  He  returned 
to  Iwa,  to  his  island.  He  said  :  "  I  have  brought  here  the 
tip  of  the  magic  ;  its  roots  remain  in  Kumilabwaga. 
There  it  will  stay,  connected  with  the  bathing  passage 
of  Kadiusawasa  and  with  the  water  of  Bokaraywata. 
In  one  spring  the  men  must  bathe,  in  the  other  the 
women."  The  man  of  Iwa  then  imposed  the  taboos  of 
the  magic,  he  prescribed  exactly  the  ritual  and  he 
stipulated  that  a  substantial  payment  should  be  made 


THE     MIRROR     OF     TRADITION         129 

to  the  people  of  Iwa  and  Kumilabwaga,  when  they 
allowed  others  to  use  their  magic  or  to  use  their  sacred 
spots.  There  is  also  a  traditional  miracle  or  at  least  an 
augury  to  those  who  perform  the  magic  on  the  beach. 
In  the  myth  this  is  represented  as  laid  down  by  the  man 
of  Iwa  ;  when  the  magic  is  performed  and  good  results 
can  be  foreseen  two  small  fish  will  be  seen  playing 
together  in  the  shallow  water  of  the  beach. 

I  have  but  summarized  here  this  last  part  of  the 
myth,  for  its  literal  form  contains  sociological  claims 
which  are  wearisome  and  degenerate  into  boastings  ; 
the  account  of  the  miraculous  element  usually  leads  into 
reminiscences  from  the  immediate  past ;  the  ritual 
details  develop  into  technicalities  and  the  Ust  of  taboos 
into  prescriptive  homilies.  But  to  the  native  narrator 
this  last  part  of  practical,  pragmatic,  and  often  of 
personal  interest,  is  perhaps  more  important  than  the 
rest,  and  the  anthropologist  has  more  to  learn  from  it 
than  from  the  preceding  dramatic  tale.  The  sociological 
claims  are  contained  in  the  myth,  since  the  magic  to 
which  it  refers  is  personal  property.  It  has  to  be  handed 
over  from  a  fully  entitled  possessor  to  one  who  lawfully 
acquires  it  from  him.  All  the  force  of  magic  consists 
in  correct  tradition.  The  fact  of  direct  filiation  by  which 
the  present  ofhciator  is  linked  to  the  original  source  is 
of  paramount  relevance.  In  certain  magical  formulae 
the  names  of  all  its  wielders  are  enumerated.  In  all 
rites  and  spells  the  conviction  that  they  are  absolutely 


130  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

in  conformity  with  the  original  pattern  is  essential. 
And  myth  figures  as  the  ultimate  source,  as  the  last 
pattern  of  this  retrogressive  series.  It  is  again  the 
charter  of  magical  succession,  the  starting-point  of  the 
pedigree. 

In  connection  with  this  a  few  words  must  be  said 
about  the  social  setting  of  magic  and  myth.  Some  forms 
of  magic  are  not  localized.  Here  belong  sorcery,  love 
magic,  beauty  niagic,  and  the  magic  of  Kula.  In 
these  forms  fihation  is  none  the  less  important,  although 
it  is  not  filiation  by  kinship.  Other  forms  of  magic  are 
associated  with  a  given  territory,  with  the  local 
industries  of  a  community,  with  certain  paramount  and 
exclusive  claims,  vested  in  a  chief  and  in  his  capital 
village.  All  garden  magic  belongs  here — the  magic 
which  must  be  born  of  the  soil,  on  which  it  can  only 
thus  be  efficacious.  Here  belongs  the  magic  of  the 
shark  and  other  fishing  of  a  local  character.  Here  also 
belong  certain  forms  of  canoe  magic,  that  of  the  red 
sheU  used  for  ornaments,  and,  above  all,  waygigi,  the 
supreme  magic  of  rain  and  sunshine,  the  exclusive 
privilege  of  the  paramount  chiefs  of  Omarakana. 

In  these  types  of  local  magic  the  esoteric  power  of 
words  is  as  much  chained  to  the  locality  as  the  group 
who  inhabit  the  village  and  wield  the  magic.  The 
magic  thus  is  not  merely  local  but  exclusive  and 
hereditary  in  a  matrilineal  kinship  group.  In  these  cases 
the  m5rth  of  magic  must  be  placed  side  by  side  with  the 


THE     MIRROR     OF     TRADITION         131 

myth  of  local  origins  as  an  essentially  sociological 
force  welding  the  group  together,  supplying  its  quota 
to  the  sentiment  of  unity,  endowing  the  group  with  a 
common  cultural  value. 

The  other  element  conspicuous  in  the  end  of  the 
above  story  and  present  also  in  most  other  magic - 
myths  is  the  enumeration  of  portents,  auguries,  and 
miracles.  It  might  be  said  that  as  the  local  myth 
establishes  the  claims  of  the  group  by  precedent,  so  the 
magical  myth  vindicates  them  by  miracle.  Magic  is 
based  upon  the  belief  in  a  specific  power,  residing  always 
in  man,  derived  always  from  tradition.^  The  efficiency 
of  this  power  is  vouched  for  by  the  myth,  but  it  has 
to  be  confirmed  also  by  the  only  thing  which  man  ever 
accepts  as  final  proof,  namely  practical  results.  "  By 
their  fruits  ye  shall  know  them."  Primitive  man  is  not 
less  eager  than  the  modem  man  of  science  to  confirm 
his  convictions  by  empirical  fact.  The  empiricism  of 
faith,  whether  savage  or  civilized,  consists  in  miracles. 
And  living  behef  will  always  generate  miracles.  There 
is  no  civilized  religion  without  its  saints  and  devils, 
without  its  illuminations  and  tokens,  without  the  spirit 
of  God  descending  upon  the  community  of  the  faithful. 
There  is  no  new-fangled  creed,  no  new  religion,  whether 
it  be  a  form  of  Spiritism,  Theosophy,  or  Christian 
Science,  which  cannot  prove  its  legitimacy  by  the  solid 

^  op.  cit.,  chapters  on  "  Magic  "  and  "  Power  of  Words  in  Magic  ", 
cf.  also  Ogden  and  Richards'  The  Meaning  of  Meaning,  chap.  ii. 


132  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

fact  of  5lipematural  manifestation.  The  savage  has 
also  his  thaumatology,  and  in  the  Trobriands,  where 
magic  dominates  all  supernaturalism,  it  is  a 
thaumatology  of  magic.  Round  each  form  of  magic 
there  is  a  continuous  trickle  of  small  miracles,  at  times 
swelling  into  bigger,  more  conspicuously  supernatural 
proofs,  then  again,  running  in  a  smaller  stream,  but 
never  absent. 

In  love  magic,  for  instance,  from  the  continuous 
boasting  about  its  success,  through  certain  remarkable 
cases  in  which  very  ugly  men  arouse  the  passion  of 
famous  beauties,  it  has  reached  the  climax  of  its 
miracle -worldng  power  in  the  recent  notorious  case  of 
incest  mentioned  above.  This  crime  is  often  accounted 
for  by  an  accident  similar  to  that  which  befell  the 
mythical  lovers,  the  brother  and  sister  of  Kumilabwaga. 
Myth  thus  forms  the  background  of  all  present-day 
miracles  ;  it  remains  their  pattern  and  standard.  I 
might  quote  from  other  stories  a  similar  relation 
between  the  original  miracle  narrated  by  myth  and  its 
repetition  in  the  current  miracles  of  living  faith.  The 
readers  of  The  Argonauts  of  the  Western  Pacific  will 
remember  how  the  mythology  of  ceremonial  trading 
casts  its  shadow  on  modem  custom  and  practice.  In 
the  magic  of  rain  and  weather,  of  gardening  and  of 
fishing,  there  is  a  strong  tendency  to  see  the  original 
miracle  repeated  in  an  attenuated  form  in  outstanding 
miraculous  confirmations  of  magical  power. 


THE     MIRROR     OF    TRADITION         133 

Finally,  the  element  of  prescriptive  injunction,  the 
laying  down  of  ritual,  taboos,  and  social  regulations 
crops  up  towards  the  end  of  most  mythical  narratives. 
When  the  myth  of  a  certain  magic  is  told  by  a  wielder 
of  the  magic,  he  naturally  will  state  his  own  functions 
as  the  outcome  of  the  story.  He  beUeves  himself  to  be 
at  one  with  the  original  founder  of  the  magic.  In  the 
love  myth,  as  we  have  seen,  the  locaUty  in  which  the 
primeval  tragedy  happened,  with  its  grotto,  its  beach, 
and  its  springs,  becomes  an  important  shrine  infused 
with  the  power  of  magic.  To  the  local  people,  who  no 
longer  have  the  exclusive  monopoly  of  magic,  certain 
prerogatives  still  associated  with  the  spot  are  of  the 
greatest  value.  That  part  of  the  ritual  which  still 
remains  bound  to  the  locality  naturally  occupies  their 
attention.  In  the  magic  of  rain  and  sunshine  of 
Omarakana,  which  is  one  of  the  comer-stones  of  the 
chief's  power,  the  myth  revolves  round  one  or  two  local 
features  which  also  figure  in  present  day  ritual. 

All  sexual  attraction,  all  power  of  seduction,  is 
believed  to  reside  in  the  magic  of  love. 

In  the  fishing  of  shark  and  of  the  kalala,  specific 
elements  of  the  locality  figure  also.  But  even  in  these 
stories  which  do  not  wed  magic  to  locality,  long 
prescriptions  of  ritual  are  either  told  as  an  integral 
part  of  the  narrative  or  else  are  put  in  the  mouth  of  one 
of  the  dramatis  personae.  The  prescriptive  character 
of  myth  shows  its  essentially  pragmatic  function,  its 


134  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

close  association  with  ritual,  with  belief,  with  living 
culture.  Myth  has  often  been  described  by  writers  of 
psycho-analysis  as  "  the  secular  dream  of  the  race  ". 
This  formula,  even  as  a  rough  approximation,  is 
incorrect  in  view  of  the  practical  and  pragmatic  nature 
of  myth  just  established.  It  has  been  necessary  barely 
to  touch  upon  this  subject  here,  for  it  is  treated  more 
fully  in  another  place. ^ 

In  this  work  I  trace  the  influence  of  a  matri- 
lineal  complex  upon  one  culture  only,  studied 
by  myself  at  first-hand  in  intensive  field  work.  But 
the  results  obtained  have  a  much  wider  application. 
For  myths  of  incest  between  brother  and  sister  are  of 
frequent  occurrence  among  matriUneal  peoples, 
especially  in  the  Pacific,  and  hatred  and  rivalry  between 
elder  and  younger  brother,  or  between  nephew  and 
maternal  uncle,  is  a  characteristic  feature  of  the  world's 
folk-lore. 

^  "  Myth  in  Primitive  Psychology,"  Psyche  Miniatures,   1926. 


PART  III 

PSYCHO-ANALYSIS  AND  ANTHROPOLOGY 

I 

THE  RIFT  BETWEEN  PSYCHO-ANALYSIS  AND 
SOCIAL  SCIENCE. 

nPHE  psycho-analytic  theory  of  the  (Edipus  complex 
was  first  framed  without  any  reference  to  the 
sociological  or  cultural  setting.  This  was  only  natural, 
for  psycho-analysis  started  as  a  technique  of  treatment 
based  on  clinical  observation.  It  was  subsequently 
expanded  into  a  general  account  of  neuroses  ;  then 
into  a  theory  of  psychological  processes  in  general ; 
finally  it  became  a  system  by  which  most  phenomena 
in  body  and  mind,  in  society  and  culture  were  to  be 
explained.  Such  claims  are  obviously  too  ambitious, 
but  even  their  partial  realization  could  have  been 
possible  only  through  intelligent  and  whole-hearted 
co-operation  between  experts  in  psycho-analysis 
and  the  various  other  specialists.  These  latter  might 
have  become  acquainted  with  psycho-analytical 
principles  and  been  led  by  these  into  new  avenues 
of  research.  In  turn,  they  might  have  placed  their 
special  knowledge  and  their  methods  at  the  disposal 
of  psycho-analysts. 

135 


136  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

Unfortunately  the  new  doctrine  was  not  accorded 
a  benevolent  and  intelligent  reception  :  on  the  contrary 
most  specialists  either  ignored  or  combated  psycho- 
analysis. As  a  consequence  we  find  a  somewhat 
rigid  and  esoteric  seclusion  on  the  psycho-analytic 
side  and  ignorance  of  what  is  without  doubt  an 
important  contribution  to  psychology  on  the  other. 

This  book  is  an  attempt  at  a  collaboration  between 
anthropology  and  psycho-analysis.  Several  similar 
attempts  have  also  been  made  from  the  psycho-analytic 
side,  as  an  example  of  which  I  shall  take  an  interesting 
article  by  Dr.  Ernest  Jones. ^  This  is  of  special  moment, 
since  it  is  a  criticism  of  the  first  part  of  this  book, 
which  appeared  as  two  preliminary  articles  in  1924.2 
Dr.  Jones's  essay  will  serve  as  a  typical  illustration 
of  certain  differences  in  the  method  of  approach  of 
anthropologists  and  of  psycho-analysts  to  the  problems 
of  primitive  society  ;  it  is  especially  suited  for  this 
since  the  author,  in  his  interpretation  of  mother-right 
among  the  Melanesians,  his  understanding  of  the 
complexity  of  their  legal  system  and  of  their  kinship 
organization,  reveals  his  grasp  of  difficult  anthropo- 
logical questions. 

It  will  be  convenient  here  to  give  a  short  summary 
of  the  views  expressed  by  Dr.  Jones.    The  purpose  of 

>  "  Mother-Right  and  the  Sexual  Ignorance  of  Savages,"  Inter- 
national Journal  of  Psycho-Analysis,  vol.  vi,  part  2,  1925,  pp.  109-30. 
*  "  Psycho-Analysis  and  Anthropology,"  Psyche,  vol.  iv. 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &     ANTHROPOLOGY     137 

his  essay  is  to  give  a  psycho-analytic  explanation 
of  the  institution  of  mother-right  and  of  the  ignorance 
of  paternity  which  obtains  among  certain  primitive 
peoples.  According  to  the  psycho-analyst  these  two 
phenomena  are  not  to  be  taken  merely  at  their  face 
value.  Thus  savages,  when  propounding  their  views 
on  procreation,  display  symbolism  of  such  an  accurate 
kind  "  as  to  indicate  at  least  an  unconscious  knowledge 
of  the  truth  ".  And  this  repressed  cognizance  of  the 
facts  of  paternity  stands  in  the  closest  relationship  to 
the  features  of  the  mother-right,  since  each  is  actuated 
by  the  same  motive — the  wish  to  deflect  the  hatred 
felt  by  the  growing  boy  towards  his  father. 

In  support  of  this  hypothesis  Dr.  Jones  draws 
to  a  considerable  extent  upon  the  material  from  the 
Trobriand  Islands,  but  differs  from  my  conclusions, 
notably  in  regard  to  the  central  theme — the  deter- 
mination of  the  form  of  the  nuclear  family  complex 
by  the  social  structure  of  the  particular  culture 
observed.  Dr.  Jones  adheres  to  Freud's  theory  of  the 
(Edipus  complex  as  a  fundamental — in  fact  primordial — 
phenomenon.  He  is  of  the  opinion  that  of  the  two 
elements  which  compose  it,  love  for  the  mother  and 
hatred  against  the  father,  the  latter  is  by  far  the  most 
important  in  leading  to  repression.  From  this  an 
avenue  of  escape  is  sought  by  simply  denying  the  act 
of  birth  from  the  father,  "  repudiation  of  the  father's 
part    in    coitus    and    procreation,    and    consequently 


138  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

softening  and  deflection  of  the  hatred  against  him  " 
(p.  122).  But  the  father  is  not  yet  disposed  of.  The 
"  attitudes  of  awe,  dread,  respect  and  suppressed 
hostihty  which  are  inseparable  from  the  idea  of  the 
father  imago ",  springing  from  "  the  obsessional 
ambivalence  of  savages  ",  have  still  to  be  dealt  with, 
so  the  maternal  uncle  is  chosen,  so  to  speak,  as  the 
scapegoat  on  whom  can  be  heaped  all  the  sins  of  the 
older  male  in  authority,  while  the  father  can  continue 
a  friendly  and  pleasant  existence  within  the  household. 
Thus  we  have  a  "  decomposition  of  the  primal  father 
into  a  kind  and  lenient  actual  father  on  the  one  hand 
and  a  stern  and  moral  uncle  on  the  other  "  (p.  125).  In 
other  words  the  combination  of  mother-right  and 
ignorance  protects  both  father  and  son  from  their 
maternal  rivalry  and  hostility.  For  Dr.  Jones,  then, 
the  (Edipus  complex  is  fundamental  ;  and  "  the 
matrilineal  system  with  its  avunculate  complex  arose, 
...  as  a  mode  of  defence  against  the  primordial 
(Edipus  tendencies  "  (p.  128). 

AU  these  views  will  strike  the  readers  of  the  first 
two  parts  of  this  book  as  not  altogether  unfamiliar, 
and  sound  in  all  the  essentials. 

I  am  not  prepared  to  endorse  unconditionally  Dr. 
Jones's  main  contention  that  both  mother-right  and 
ignorance  of  paternity  have  come  into  being  "  to 
deflect  the  hatred  towards  his  father  felt  by  the 
growing  boy  "  (p.  120).   I  think  this  statement  requires 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &     ANTHROPOLOGY     139 

a  fuller  testing  in  the  various  anthropological  provinces. 
But  this  view  seems  to  me  to  be  perfectly  well  in 
harmony  with  aU  the  facts  which  I  have  discovered 
in  Melanesia,  and  with  any  other  kinship  systems 
with  which  I  am  acquainted  through  Uterature. 
Should  Dr.  Jones's  hypothesis  become  established  by 
subsequent  research,  as  I  think  and  hope  it  will  be, 
the  value  of  my  own  contributions  will  obviously 
be  very  much  enhanced.  For  instead  of  having  drawn 
attention  to  a  mere  accidental  constellation,  I  should 
have  had  the  good  fortune  to  discover  phenomena 
of  universal  evolutionary  and  genetic  importance. 
In  a  way  it  seems  to  me  that  Dr.  Jones's  hypothesis 
is  a  daring  and  original  extension  of  my  own  con- 
clusions, that  in  mother-right  the  family  complex 
must  be  different  from  the  (Edipus  complex  ;  that  in 
the  matrilineal  conditions  the  hate  is  removed  from 
the  father  and  placed  upon  the  maternal  uncle  ;  that 
any  incestuous  temptations  are  directed  towards  the 
sister  rather  than  towards  the  mother. 

Dr.  Jones  takes,  however,  not  only  a  more  compre- 
hensive point  of  view,  in  which  I  am  prepared  to 
follow  him ;  he  places,  besides,  a  certain  causal 
or  metaphysical  stress  in  that  he  regards  the  complex 
as  the  cause,  and  the  whole  sociological  structure  as 
the  effect.  In  Dr.  Jones's  essay,  as  in  most  psycho- 
analytic interpretations  of  folk-lore,  custom  and  institu- 
tions, the  universal  occurrence  of  the  (Edipus  complex 


140  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

is  being  assumed,  as  if  it  existed  independently  of  the 
type  of  culture,  of  the  social  organization  and  of  the 
concomitant  ideas.  Wherever  we  find  in  folk-lore 
hatred  between  two  males,  one  of  them  is  interpreted 
as  s5nTibolizing  the  father,  the  other  the  son,  irrespec- 
tive of  whether  in  that  society  there  are  any  oppor- 
tunities for  a  father  and  son  to  conflict.  Again,  all 
repressed  or  illicit  passion  which  we  find  so  often 
in  mythological  tragedies  is  due  to  the  incestuous 
love  between  mother  and  son,  even  though  such 
temptations  could  be  shown  to  have  been  eliminated  by 
the  type  of  organization  prevalent  in  that  community. 
Consequently  Dr.  Jones  in  the  article  quoted  above 
maintains  that  while  my  results  may  be  correct  "  on 
the  purely  descriptive  plane  ",  the  correlation  between 
sociology  and  psychology  on  which  I  insist  is 
"extremely  doubtful"  (p.  127).  And  again  that  "if 
attention  is  concentrated  on  the  sociological  aspects 
of  the  data  "  my  view  might  "  appear  a  very  ingenuous 
and  perhaps  even  plausible  suggestion  ",  but  that  it 
was  only  my  "  imperfect  attention  to  the  genetic 
aspects  of  the  problem  "  which  "  has  led  to  a  lack  of  .  .  . 
a  dimensional  perspective,  i.e.  a  sense  of  value  based 
on  intimate  knowledge  of  the  unconscious"  (p.  128). 
Dr.  Jones  arrives  at  the  conclusion,  somewhat  crushing 
to  me,  "  that  the  opposite  of  Malinowski's  conception 
is  nearer  the  truth  "  (ibid). 
The  radical  discrepancy  between  psycho-analytical 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &     ANTHROPOLOGY     141 

doctrine  and  empirical  anthropology  or  sociology 
implied  in  these  quotations  does  not  seem  to  me  to 
exist.  I  should  not  like  to  see  psycho-analysis  divorced 
from  the  empirical  science  of  culture,  nor  the  descriptive 
work  in  anthropology  deprived  of  the  assistance  of 
psycho-analytical  theory.  I  cannot  myself  plead 
guilty  of  overemphasizing  the  sociological  elements 
either.  I  have  tried  to  introduce  these  factors  into 
the  formula  of  the  nuclear  complex,  but  I  have  in  no 
way  minimized  the  importance  of  biological,  psycho- 
logical, or  unconscious  factors. 


II 

A    "  REPRESSED    COMPLEX  " 

iy  yf  Y  main  contention  is  concisely  and  adequately 
summed  up  by  Dr.  Jones  himself  as  "  the  view 
that  the  nuclear  family  complex  varies  according  to  the 
particular  family  structure  existing  in  any  community. 
According  to  him  (i.e.  to  Malinowski)  a  matrilineal 
family  system  arises,  for  unknown  social  and  economic 
reasons,  and  then  the  repressed  nuclear  complex 
consists  of  brother  and  sister  attraction,  with  nephew 
and  uncle  hatred  ;  when  this  system  is  replaced  by  a 
patrilineal  one,  the  nuclear  complex  becomes  the 
familiar  CEdipus  one"  (pp.  127  and  128).  All  this  is 
a  perfectly  correct  interpretation  of  my  views,  though 
Dr.  Jones  has  gone  beyond  the  scope  of  my  previously 
published  conclusions.  As  a  field-worker  I  have 
remained  throughout  my  essay  on  the  "  purely  descrip- 
tive plane",  but  in  this  Part  I  shall  presently  take  the 
opportunity  of  setting  forth  my  genetic  views. 

As  has  been  already  mentioned,  the  crux  of  the 
difficulty  lies  in  the  fact  that  to  Dr.  Jones  and  other 
psycho-analysts  the  (Edipus  complex  is  something 
absolute,  the  primordial  source,  in  his  own  words  the 
Ions  el  origo  of  everything.     To  me  on  the  other  hand 

142 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &    ANTHROPOLOGY     143 

the  nuclear  family  complex  is  a  functional  formation 
dependent  upon  the  structure  and  upon  the  culture 
of  a  society.  It  is  necessarily  determined  by  the  manner 
in  which  sexual  restrictions  are  moulded  in  a  community 
and  by  the  manner  in  which  authority  is  apportioned. 
I  cannot  conceive  of  the  complex  as  the  first  cause  of 
everything,  as  the  unique  source  of  culture,  of  organiza- 
tion and  belief  ;  as  the  metaphysical  entity,  creative, 
but  not  created,  prior  to  all  things  and  not  caused  by 
anything  else. 

Let  me  quote  some  more  significant  passages  from 
Dr.  Jones's  article  in  order  to  indicate  the  obscurities 
and  contradictions  to  which  I  have  alluded.  They 
illustrate  the  type  of  argument  which  we  meet  in  the 
orthodox  psycho-analytic  discussions  of  savage 
custom. 

Even  where  they  admittedly  cannot  be  found  in  actual 
existence,  as  in  the  matrilineal  societies  of  Melanesia, 
the  "  primordial  (Edipus  tendencies  "  are  still  lurking 
behind :  "  The  forbidden  and  unconsciously  loved 
sister  is  only  a  substitute  for  the  mother,  as  the  uncle 
plainly  is  for  the  father"  (p.  128).  In  other  words  the 
(Edipus  complex  is  merely  screened  by  another  one, 
or  painted  over  by  the  other  complex,  in  slightly 
different  colours.  As  a  matter  of  fact.  Dr.  Jones 
uses  an  even  stronger  terminology  and  speaks  about 
the  "  repression  of  the  complex  "  and  about  "  the 
various  complicated  devices  whereby  this  repression 


144  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

is  brought  about  and  maintained"  (p.  120).  And  here 
comes  the  first  obscurity.  I  have  always  understood  that 
a  complex  is  an  actual  configuration  of  attitudes  and 
sentiments  partly  overt,  partly  repressed,  but  actually 
existing  in  the  unconscious.  Such  a  complex  can  always 
be  empirically  reached  by  the  practical  methods  of 
psycho-analysis,  by  the  study  of  mythology,  folk-lore 
and  other  cultural  manifestations  of  the  unconscious. 
If,  however,  as  Dr.  Jones  seems  fully  to  admit,  the 
attitudes  typical  of  the  (Edipus  complex  cannot  be 
found  either  in  the  conscious  or  unconscious  ;  if,  as 
has  been  proved,  there  are  no  traces  of  it  either  in 
Trobriand  folk-lore  or  in  dreams  and  visions,  or  in  any 
other  symptoms  ;  if  in  all  these  manifestations  we 
find  instead  the  other  complex — where  is  then  the 
repressed  (Edipus  complex  to  be  found  ?  Is  there  a 
sub-unconscious  below  the  actual  unconscious  and 
what  does  the  concept  of  a  repressed  repression  mean  ? 
Surely  all  this  goes  beyond  the  ordinary  psycho-analytic 
doctrine  and  leads  us  into  some  unknown  fields; ;  I 
suspect  moreover  that  they  are  the  fields  of  meta- 
physics ! 

Let  us  turn  to  the  devices  by  which  the  repression 
of  the  complex  is  brought  about.  According  to  Dr. 
Jones  they  consist  in  a  tendency  to  divorce  relation- 
ship and  social  kinship  in  the  various  customary 
denials  of  actual  birth,  in  the  enactment  of  a  ritual 
birth,   in   the   affectation   of   ignorance   of   paternity 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &     ANTHROPOLOGY     145 

and  so  on.  I  would  like  to  state  here  at  once  that  in 
this  I  am  very  much  in  agreement  with  Dr.  Jones's 
point  of  view,  though  I  might  differ  in  certain  details. 
Thus  I  am  not  quite  sure  whether  I  would  speak  of 
a  "  tendentious  denial  of  physical  paternity  "  since 
I  am  firmly  convinced  that  the  ignorance  of  these 
complicated  physiological  processes  is  as  natural  and 
direct  as  is  the  ignorance  of  the  processes  of  digestion, 
secretion,  of  the  gradual  bodily  decay,  in  short,  of 
all  that  happens  in  the  human  body.  I  do  not  know 
why  we  should  assume  that  people  on  a  very  low  level 
of  culture  have  received  their  early  revelation  about 
certain  aspects  of  embrj^ology  while  in  all  other  aspects 
of  natural  science  they  know  next  to  nothing  a$  to  the 
causal  connections  of  phenomena.  That,  however, 
the  divorce  or  at  least  the  partial  autonomy  of 
biological  and  social  relations  under  culture  is 
of  the  greatest  importance  in  primitive  society 
I  shall  try  to  demonstrate  presently  at  some 
length. 

In  the  matter  of  ignorance  of  paternity,  however, 
there  seems  to  me  a  slight  discrepancy  in  Dr.  Jones's 
views.  In  one  place  we  are  told  "  there  is  the  closest 
collateral  relationship  between  ignorance  about  paternal 
procreation  on  the  one  hand  and  the  institution  of 
mother-right  on  the  other.  My  view  is  that  both  these 
phenomena  are  brought  about  by  the  same  motive  ; 
in  what  chronological  relation  they  stand  to  each  other 


146  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

is  another  question  altogether,  which  will  be  considered 
later.  The  motive,  according  to  this  view,  in  both 
cases  is  to  deflect  the  hatred  towards  his  father  felt  by 
the  growing  boy  "  (p.  120).  The  point  is  crucial  and  yet 
Dr.  Jones  does  not  himself  feel  quite  certain  about  it. 
For  in  another  place  he  tells  us  that  there  is  no  "  reason 
to  suppose  that  the  savage  ignorance,  or  rather 
repression,  of  the  facts  of  paternal  procreation  is  a 
necessary  accompaniment  of  mother-right,  though 
it  is  evident  that  it  must  be  a  valuable  support  to  the 
motives  discussed  above  which  led  to  the  instituting 
of  mother-right  "  (p.  130).  The  relation  between  the 
two  sentences  quoted  is  not  quite  clear,  and  while  the 
latter  is  not  quite  correct  the  former  would  be  more 
lucid  if  we  were  told  what  the  author  means  by  the 
"  closest  collateral  relationship  ".  Does  that  mean 
that  both  ignorance  and  mother-right  are  necessary 
effects  of  the  principal  cause,  i.e.,  the  (Edipus  complex, 
or  are  they  both  loosely  connected  with  it  ?  If  so  what 
are  the  conditions  under  which  the  necessity  to  mask 
the  (Edipus  complex  leads  to  mother-right  and 
ignorance,  and  what  are  the  conditions  in  which  it 
does  not  lead  to  these  effects  ?  Without  such  concrete 
data  Dr.  Jones's  theory  is  not  much  more  than  a  vague 
suggestion. 

Having  examined  the  devices,  let  us  have  a  look 
at  the  "  primordial  cause  ".  This,  as  we  know,  is  the 
(Edipus    complex    conceived     in     an     absolute    and 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &    ANTHROPOLOGY     147 

genetically  transcendental  manner.  Going  beyond 
Dr.  Jones's  essay  to  the  anthropological  contributions 
of  psycho-analysts  in  general,  we  learn  how  the  CEdipus 
complex  is  supposed  to  have  originally  come  into 
being.  It  originated  by  the  famous  totemic  crime 
in  the  primeval  horde. 


Ill 

"THE    PRIMORDIAL    CAUSE    OF    CULTURE" 

T^REUD'S  theory  of  the  dramatic  beginnings  of 
totemism  and  taboo,  of  exogamy  and  sacrifice,  is 
of  great  importance  in  all  psycho-analytic  writings 
on  anthropology.  It  cannot  be  passed  over  in  any  essay 
like  the  present  one,  which  tries  to  bring  psycho- 
analytic views  into  line  with  anthropological  findings. 
We  shall  therefore  take  this  opportunity  of  entering 
into  a  detailed  critical  analysis  of  the  theory. 

In  his  book  on  Totem  and  Taboo  Freud  shows  how 
the  OEdipus  complex  can  serve  to  explain  totemism 
and  the  avoidance  of  the  mother-in-law,  ancestor 
worship  and  the  prohibitions  of  incest,  the  identifica- 
tion of  man  with  his  totemic  animal  and  the  idea  of 
the  God  Father.*  In  fact  the  (Edipus  complex,  as  we 
know,  has  to  be  regarded  by  psycho-analysts  as  the 
source  of  culture,  as  having  occurred  before  the 
beginnings  of  culture,  and  in  his  book  Freud  gives  us 
precisely  the  hypothesis  describing  how  it  actually 
came  into  being. 

In  this  Freud  takes  the  cue  from  two  illustrious 
predecessors,   Darwin  and  Robertson   Smith.     From 

^  S.  Freud,  Totem  and  Taboo,  New  York,  1918.  The  quotations 
in  the  text  refer  to  the  American  Edition . 

148 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &     ANTHROPOLOGY     149 

Darwin  he  borrows  the  idea  of  "  primal  horde  "  or  as  it 
was  renamed  by  Atkinson  "  the  Cyclopean  family  ". 
According  to  this  view  the  earUest  form  of  family 
or  social  life  consisted  of  small  groups  led  and  dominated 
by  a  mature  male  who  kept  in  subjection  a  number  of 
females  and  children.  From  another  great  student, 
Robertson  Smith,  Freud  received  the  suggestion 
about  the  importance  of  the  totemic  sacrament. 
Robertson  Smith  considers  that  the  earliest  act  of 
religion  consisted  of  a  common  meal  in  which  the 
totemic  animal  was  ceremonially  eaten  by  the  members 
of  the  clan.  In  later  development  sacrifice,  the  almost 
universal  and  certainly  the  most  important  rehgious  act, 
emerged  from  the  totemic  meal.  The  taboo  forbidding 
the  eating  of  totemic  species  at  ordinary  times 
constitutes  the  negative  side  of  the  ritual  communion. 
To  these  two  hypotheses  Freud  added  one  of  his  own  : 
the  identification  of  man  with  the  totem  is  a  trait  of 
the  mentality  common  to  children,  primitives  and 
neurotics,  based  upon  the  tendency  to  identify  the 
father  with  some  unpleasant  animal. 

In  this  context  we  are  primarily  interested  in  the 
sociological  side  of  the  theory  and  I  shaU  quote  in 
full  the  passage  of  Darwin's  upon  which  is  built  Freud's 
theory.  Says  Darwin  :  "  We  may  indeed  conclude 
from  what  we  know  of  the  jealousy  of  all  male 
quadrupeds,  armed,  as  many  of  them  are,  with  special 
weapons  for  battling  with  their  rivals,  that  promiscuous 


150  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

intercourse  in  a  state  of  nature  is  extremely  improbable. 
...  If  we  therefore  look  back  far  enough  into  the 
stream  of  time  and  judging  from  the  social  habits 
of  man  as  he  now  exists,  the  most  probable  view  is 
that  he  originally  lived  in  small  communities,  each  with 
a  single  wife,  or  if  powerful  with  several,  whom  he 
jealously  defended  against  all  other  men.  Or  he  may 
not  have  been  a  social  animal  and  yet  have  lived  with 
several  wives,  like  the  gorilla  ;  for  all  the  natives  agree 
that  only  the  adult  male  is  seen  in  a  band  ;  when  the 
young  male  grows  up  a  contest  takes  place  for  mastery 
and  the  strongest,  by  killing  and  driving  out  the  others, 
establishes  himself  as  the  head  of  the  community 
(Dr.  Savage  in  the  Boston  Journal  of  Natural  History, 
vol.  V,  1845-47).  The  younger  males  thus  being 
driven  out  and  wandering  about  would  also,  when  at 
last  successful  in  finding  a  partner,  prevent  too  close 
inbreeding  within  the  limits  of  the  same  family."  * 
I  may  at  once  point  out  that  in  this  passage  Darwin 
speaks  about  man  and  gorillas  indiscriminately. 
Nor  is  there  any  reason  why  we  as  anthropologists 
should  blame  him  for  this  confusion — the  least  our 
science  can  do  is  to  deprive  us  of  any  vanities  with 
regard  to  our  anthropoid  brethren  !  But  if  philo- 
sophically the  difference  between  a  man  and  a  monkey 
is  insignificant,  the  distinction  between  family  as  we 

*  S.   Freud,   Totem  and  Taboo,    1918,  pp.  207-208,  quoted   from 
Darwin,  "  The  Descent  of  Man,"  vol.  ii,  chapter  20,  pp.  603-604. 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &     ANTHROPOLOGY     151 

find  it  among  the  anthropoid  apes  and  the  organized 
human  family  is  of  extreme  importance  for  the 
sociologist.  He  has  to  discriminate  clearly  between 
animal  life  in  the  state  of  nature  and  human  life  under 
culture.  To  Darwin,  who  was  developing  a  biological 
argument  against  the  hypothesis  of  promiscuity, 
the  distinction  was  irrelevant.  Had  he  been  dealing 
with  the  origins  of  culture,  had  he  tried  to  define  the 
moment  of  its  birth,  the  line  of  distinction  between 
nature  and  culture  would  have  been  all-important. 
Freud  who,  as  we  shall  see,  actually  does  attempt  to 
grasp  and  to  render  the  "  great  event  with  which 
culture  began  ",  fails  completely  in  his  task  in  that 
he  loses  sight  of  this  line  of  division  and  places  culture 
in  conditions  in  which,  ex  hypothesi,  it  cannot  exist. 
Darwin  speaks,  moreover,  only  about  the  wives  of 
the  leader  of  the  herd,  and  not  of  any  other  females. 
He  also  states  that  the  excommunicated  young  males 
succeed  finally  in  finding  a  partner  and  do  not  trouble 
any  more  about  their  parental  family.  On  both  these 
points  Freud  substantially  modifies  the  Darwinian 
hypothesis. 

Let  me  quote  the  words  of  the  master  of  psycho- 
analysis in  full  so  as  to  substantiate  my  criticism. 
Says  Freud  :  "  The  Darwinian  conception  of  the  primal 
horde  does  not,  of  course,  allow  for  the  beginnings  of 
totemism.  There  is  only  a  violent,  jealous  father 
who  keeps  all  the  females  for  himself  and  drives  away 


152  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

the  growing  sons  "  (p.  233).  As  we  see,  the  old  male  is 
made  to  keep  all  the  females  for  himself  while  the 
expelled  sons  remain  somewhere  in  the  neighbour- 
hood, banded  together,  in  order  to  be  ready  for  the 
hypothetical  event.  And  indeed  a  crime  is  conjured 
up  before  our  eyes  as  bloodcurdling  as  it  is  hypothetical, 
yet  of  the  greatest  importance  in  the  history  of  Psycho- 
analysis, if  not  of  Humanity  !  For  according  to  Freud 
it  is  destined  to  give  birth  to  all  future  civilization. 
It  is  "  the  great  event  with  which  culture  began  and 
which  ever  since  has  not  let  mankind  come  to  rest  "  ; 
it  is  the  "  deed  that  was  in  the  beginning  "  ;  it  is  the 
"  memorable,  criminal  act  with  which  .  .  .  began 
social  organization,  moral  restrictions  and  religion  " 
(pp.  234,  239,  265).  Let  us  hear  the  story  of  this 
primordial  cause  of  all  culture. 

"  One  day  the  expelled  brothers  joined  forces, 
slew  and  ate  the  father,  and  thus  put  an  end  to  the 
father  horde.  Together  they  dared  and  accomplished 
what  would  have  remained  impossible  for  them  singly. 
Perhaps  some  advance  in  culture,  like  the  use  of  a  new 
weapon,  had  given  them  the  feeling  of  superiority. 
Of  course  these  cannibalistic  savages  ate  their  victim. 
This  violent  primal  father  had  surely  been  the  envied 
and  feared  model  for  each  of  the  brothers.  Now  they 
accomplished  their  identification  with  him  by  devouring 
him  and  each  acquired  a  part  of  his  strength.  The 
totem  feast,  which  is  perhaps  mankind's  first  celebra- 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &     ANTHROPOLOGY     153 

tion,    would   be   the   repetition    and    commemoration 
of  this  memorable  .  .  .  act  .  .   .  "  (p.  234). 

This  is  the  original  act  of  human  culture  and  yet 
in  the  middle  of  the  description  the  author 
speaks  about  "  some  advance  in  culture ",  about 
"  the  use  of  a  new  weapon  ",  and  thus  equips  his 
pre-cultural  animals  with  a  substantial  store  of 
cultural  goods  and  implements.  No  material  culture 
is  imaginable  without  the  concomitant  existence  of 
organization,  morality,  and  religion.  As  I  shall 
show  presently,  this  is  not  a  mere  quibble  but  it  goes 
to  the  very  heart  of  the  matter.  We  shall  see  that  the 
theory  of  Freud  and  Jones  tries  to  explain  the  origins 
of  culture  by  a  process  which  implies  the  previous 
existence  of  culture  and  hence  involves  a  circular 
argument.  A  criticism  of  this  position  will  in  fact 
naturally  lead  us  right  into  the  analysis  of  cultural 
process  and  of  its  foundations  in  biology. 


IV 

THE     CONSEQUENCES    OF    THE     PARRICIDE 

T3  EFORE  we  pass  a  detailed  criticism  on  this  theory, 
however,  let  us  patiently  hear  all  that  Freud 
has  to  tell  us  in  this  matter — it  is  always  worth  while 
listening  to  him.  "...  the  group  of  brothers  banded 
together  were  dominated  by  the  same  contradictory 
feelings  towards  the  father  which  we  can  demonstrate 
as  the  content  of  ambivalence  of  the  father  complex 
in  all  our  children  and  in  neurotics.  They  hated  their 
father  who  stood  so  powerfully  in  the  way  of  their 
sexual  demands  and  their  desire  for  power,  but  they 
also  loved  and  admired  him.  After  they  had  satisfied 
their  hate  by  his  removal  and  had  carried  out  their 
wish  for  identification  with  him,  the  suppressed  tender 
impulses  had  to  assert  themselves.  This  took  place 
in  the  form  of  remorse,  a  sense  of  guilt  was  formed 
which  coincided  here  with  the  remorse  generally  felt. 
The  dead  now  became  stronger  than  the  living  had 
been,  even  as  we  observe  it  to-day  in  the  destinies 
of  men.  What  the  father's  presence  had  formerly 
prevented  they  themselves  now  prohibited  in  the 
psychic  situation  of  '  subsequent  obedience  '  which  we 
know  so  weU  from  psycho-analysis.    They  undid  their 

154 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &    ANTHROPOLOGY     155 

deed  by  declaring  that  the  killing  of  the  father 
substitute,  the  totem,  was  not  allowed,  and  renounced 
the  fruits  of  their  deed  by  denying  themselves  the 
liberated  women.  Thus  they  created  the  two  funda- 
mental taboos  of  totemism  out  of  the  sense  of  guilt 
of  the  son,  and  for  this  very  reason  these  had  to 
correspond  with  the  two  repressed  wishes  of  the 
(Edipus  complex.  Whoever  disobeyed  became  guilty 
of  the  two  only  crimes  which  troubled  primitive 
society"  (pp.  235-236). 

We  see  thus  the  parricidal  sons  immediately  after 
the  act  of  murder  engaged  in  laying  down  laws  and 
religious  taboos,  instituting  forms  of  social  organiza- 
tion, in  brief  moulding  cultural  forms  which  will  be 
handed  on  far  down  the  history  of  mankind.  And 
here  again  we  are  faced  by  the  dilemma  :  did  the 
raw  material  of  culture  exist  already — in  which  case 
the  "  great  event  "  could  not  have  created  culture 
as  it  is  supposed  by  Freud  to  have  done,  or  was  culture 
at  the  time  of  the  deed  not  yet  in  existence — in  which 
case  the  sons  could  not  have  instituted  sacraments, 
established  laws  and  handed  on  customs. 

Freud  does  not  completely  ignore  this  point,  though 
he  hardly  seems  to  have  recognized  its  crucial 
importance.  He  anticipates  the  question  as  to  the 
possibilities  of  a  lasting  influence  of  the  primeval 
crime  and  of  its  enduring  action  across  successive 
generations  of  man.     To  meet  any  possible  objections 


156  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

Freud  summons  to  his  aid  another  hypothesis  :  "  .  .  .  it 
can  hardly  have  escaped  anyone  that  we  base  every- 
thing upon  the  assumption  of  a  psyche  of  the  mass 
in  which  psychic  processes  occur  as  in  the  psychic 
hfe  of  the  individual  "  (p.  259).  But  this  assumption 
of  a  collective  soul  is  not  sufficient.  We  have  to 
endow  this  comprehensive  entity  also  with  an  almost 
unhmited  memory.  "...  we  let  the  sense  of  guilt 
for  a  deed  survive  for  thousands  of  years,  remaining 
effective  in  generations  which  could  not  have  known 
anything  of  this  deed.  We  allow  an  emotional  process 
such  as  might  have  arisen  among  generations  of  sons 
that  had  been  ill-treated  by  their  fathers,  to  continue 
to  new  generations  which  had  escaped  such  treatment 
by  the  very  removal  of  the  father  "  (p.  259). 

Freud  is  somewhat  uneasy  about  the  validity  of 
this  assumption  but  an  argumentum  ad  hominem  is 
ready  at  hand.  Freud  assures  us  that  however  daring 
his  hypothesis  "  .  .  .  we  ourselves  do  not  have  to 
carry  the  whole  responsibility  for  such  daring " 
(p.  260).  Not  only  that  :  the  writer  lays  down  a 
universal  rule  for  anthropologists  and  sociologists. 
"  Without  the  assumption  of  a  mass  psyche,  or  a 
continuity  in  the  emotional  life  of  mankind  which 
permits  us  to  disregard  the  interruptions  of  psychic 
acts  through  the  transgression  of  individuals,  social 
psychology  could  not  exist  at  all.  If  psychic  processes 
of  one  generation  did  not  continue  in  the  next,  if  each 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &     ANTHROPOLOGY     157 

had  to  acquire  its  attitude  towards  life  afresh,  there 
would  be  no  progress  in  this  field  and  almost  no 
development  "  (p.  260).  And  here  we  touch  on  a  very 
important  point  :  the  methodological  necessity  of  the 
figment  of  a  collective  soul.  As  a  point  of  fact 
no  competent  anthropologist  now  makes  any  such 
assumption  of  "  mass  psyche  ",  of  the  inheritance  of 
acquired  "  psychic  dispositions  ",  or  of  any  "  psychic 
continuity"  transcending  the  limits  of  the  individual 
soul.^  On  the  other  hand  anthropologists  can  clearly 
indicate  what  the  medium  is  in  which  the  experiences 
of  each  generation  are  deposited  and  stored  up  for 
successive  generations.  This  medium  is  that  body 
of  material  objects,  traditions,  and  stereotyped  mental 
processes  which  we  call  culture.  It  is  super-individual 
but  not  psychological.  It  is  moulded  by  man  and 
moulds  him  in  turn.  It  is  the  only  medium  in 
which  man  can  express  any  creative  impulse  and 
thus    add    his     share     to     the    common     stock    of 

^  All  the  anthropological  authorities,  for  instance,  upon  whom 
Freud  bases  his  work,  Lang,  Crawley,  Marett,  never  once  in  their 
analysis  of  custom,  belief,  and  institution  have  employed  such  or  a 
similar  concept.  Frazer  above  all  rules  this  conception  consciously 
and  methodically  out  of  his  work  (personal  communication). 
Durkheim,  who  verges  upon  this  metaphysical  fallacy,  has  been 
criticized  on  this  point  by  most  modem  anthropologists.  Leading 
sociologists  such  as  Hobhouse,  Westermarck,  Dewey,  and  social 
anthropologists  such  as  Lowie,  Kroeber,  Boas,  have  consistently 
avoided  the  introduction  of  "  the  collective  sensorium  ".  For 
a  searching  and  destructive  criticism  of  certain  attempts  at  a 
sociological  use  of  "  mass  psyche  "  compare  M.  Ginsberg,  "  The 
Psychology  of  Society  "  (1921). 


158  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

human  values.  It  is  the  only  reservoir  from  which 
the  individual  can  draw  when  he  wants  to  utilize 
the  experiences  of  others  for  his  personal  benefit. 
A  fuller  analysis  of  culture  to  which  we  shall  presently 
pass  will  reveal  to  us  the  mechanism  by  which  it  is 
created,  maintained,  and  transmitted.  This  analysis 
will  also  show  us  that  the  complex  is  the  natural 
by-product  of  the  coming  into  existence  of  culture. 

It  will  be  obvious  to  any  reader  of  Dr.  Jones's 
article  that  he  fully  adopts  Freud's  hypothesis  about 
the  origins  of  human  civilization.  From  the  passages 
previously  quoted  it  is  clear  that  to  him  the  (Edipus 
complex  is  the  origin  of  everything.  Hence  it  must 
be  a  pre-cultural  formation.  Dr.  Jones  even  more 
explicitly  commits  himself  to  Freud's  theory  in  the 
following  passages  :  "  Far  from  being  led  by  considera- 
tion of  the  subject,  as  Malinowski  was,  to  abandon  or 
revise  Freud's  conception  of  the  '  primal  horde ' 
(Atkinson's  '  cyclopean  family '),  it  seems  to  me, 
on  the  contrary,  that  this  conception  furnishes  the 
most  satisfactory  explanation  of  the  complicated 
problems  which  we  have  been  discussing  "  (p.  130).  Dr. 
Jones  also  is  in  full  agreement  with  the  racial  memory 
of  the  original  crime,  for  he  speaks  about  the 
"  inheritance  of  impulses  dating  from  the  primal 
horde  "  (p.  121). 


V 

THE  ORIGINAL  PARRICIDE  ANALYZED 

T  ET  us  examine  now  point  by  point  the  hypotheses 
of  Freud  and  Jones.  The  hypothesis  of  the 
"primeval  horde  "has  in  itself  nothing  objectionable 
to  the  anthropologist.  We  know  that  the  earliest  form 
of  human  and  pre-human  kinship  was  the  family 
based  on  marriage  with  one  or  more  females.  In 
accepting  the  Darwinian  view  of  kinship,  psycho- 
analysis has  discarded  the  hypotheses  of  primitive 
promiscuity,  group  marriage  and  sexual  communism, 
and  in  this  it  has  the  full  support  of  competent 
anthropologists.  But  as  we  have  seen,  Darwin  made 
no  exphcit  distinction  between  the  animal  and  the 
human  status,  and  Freud  in  his  reconstruction  of 
Darwin's  argument  obliterated  whatever  distinction  was 
implied  in  the  great  naturalist's  account.  We  have  to 
enquire  therefore  into  the  constitution  of  the  family 
at  the  anthropoid  end  of  the  human  level  of  develop- 
ment. We  have  to  ask  the  question  :  What  are  the 
bonds  of  union  within  the  family,  before  it  became 
human  and  after  ?  What  is  the  difference  between 
animal  and  human  kinship  ;  between  the  anthropoid 
family  in  the  state  of  nature  and  the  earliest  type  of 
human  family  under  conditions  of  culture  ? 

The  pre-human  anthropoid  family  was  united  by 

159 


i6o  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

instinctive  or  innate  bonds,  modified  by  individual 
experience  but  not  influenced  by  tradition,  for  animals 
have  no  language,  no  laws,  no  institutions.  In  the  state 
of  nature  the  male  and  female  mate,  driven  by  the 
selective  sexual  impulse  operating  at  the  time  of  rut 
and  at  that  time  only.  After  the  impregnation  of 
the  female,  a  new  impulse  leads  to  the  establishment 
of  common  life,  the  male  acting  as  protector  and 
guarding  over  the  process  of  pregnancy.  With  the 
act  of  birth,  the  maternal  impulses  of  suckling,  tending, 
and  caring  for  the  offspring  appear  in  the  female, 
while  the  male  responds  to  the  new  situation  by 
providing  food,  keeping  watch,  and  if  need  be  engaging 
in  dangerous  combats  in  the  defence  of  the  family. 
Considering  the  protracted  growth  and  slow  ripening 
of  the  individual  among  the  anthropoid  apes,  it  is 
indispensable  for  the  species  that  parental  love  should 
arise  in  both  male  and  female  and  last  for  some  time 
after  birth  until  the  new  individual  is  ready  to  look 
after  himself.  As  soon  as  he  is  mature  there  is  no 
biological  need  to  keep  the  family  together.  As  we 
shall  see,  this  need  arises  in  culture,  where  for  the  sake 
of  co-operation  the  members  of  the  family  must  remain 
united  ;  while  for  the  sake  of  handing  on  tradition 
the  new  generation  must  remain  in  contact  with  the 
previous  one.  But  in  the  pre-human  Cyclopean  family 
as  soon  as  the  male  or  female  children  became 
independent  they  would  naturally  leave  the  horde. 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &     ANTHROPOLOGY     i6i 

This  is  what  we  find  empirically  in  every  simian 
species.  This  subserves  the  interests  of  the  species 
and  has  therefore  to  be  assumed  on  general  principles. 
It  also  tallies  with  all  which  we  can  infer  from  our 
general  knowledge  of  animal  instincts.  We  find  also 
in  most  higher  mammals  that  the  old  male  leaves 
the  herd  as  soon  as  he  is  past  full  vigour  and  thus 
makes  room  for  a  younger  guardian.  This  is  service- 
able for  a  species,  for  as  with  man  temper  in  animals 
does  not  improve  with  age,  and  an  old  leader  is 
less  useful  and  more  liable  to  create  conflict.  In  all 
this  we  see  that  the  working  of  instincts  in  the 
condition  of  nature  leaves  no  room  for  special  complica- 
tions, inner  conflicts,  suspended  emotions  or  tragical 
events. 

Family  life  in  the  highest  animal  species  is  thus 
cemented  and  governed  by  innate  emotional  attitudes. 
Where  the  biological  need  arises  there  also  appear 
the  appropriate  mental  responses.  When  the  need 
ceases  the  emotional  attitude  disappears.  If  we 
define  instinct  as  a  pattern  of  behaviour  in  direct 
response  to  a  situation,  a  response  accompanied  by 
pleasurable  feelings — then  we  can  say  that  animal 
family  life  is  determined  by  a  chain  of  linked  instincts  : 
courtship,  mating,  common  life,  tenderness  towards 
infants  and  mutual  help  of  the  parents.  Each  of  these 
links  follows  the  other,  releasing  it  completely,  for 
it  is  characteristic  of  such  concatenations  of  instinctive 


i62  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

responses  that  each  new  situation  requires  a  new  type 
of  behaviour  and  a  new  emotional  attitude.  Psycho- 
logically it  is  very  important  to  realize  that  each  new 
response  replaces  and  obliterates  the  old  emotional 
attitude ;  that  no  traces  of  the  previous  emotion 
are  carried  over  into  the  new  one.  While  governed 
by  a  new  instinct  the  animal  is  no  more  in  the  throes 
of  a  previous  one.  Remorse,  mental  conflict, 
ambivalent  emotion — these  are  cultural,  that  is  human, 
and  not  animal  responses.  The  working  of  instincts, 
the  unrolling  of  instinctive  sequences,  may  be  more  or 
less  successful,  accompanied  by  more  or  less  friction, 
but  it  does  not  leave  any  room  for  "  endopsychic 
tragedies  ". 

What  is  the  importance  of  all  this  in  respect  to  the 
hypothesis  of  primeval  crime  ?  I  have  pointed  out 
repeatedly  that  the  Great  Tragedy  has  been  placed 
by  Freud  at  the  threshold  of  culture  and  as  its 
inaugural  act.  Putting  aside  the  several  direct  quota- 
tions from  Freud  and  Jones — and  these  could  be  easily 
multiplied — it  is  important  to  realize  that  this  is  an 
assumption  indispensable  to  their  theories  :  all  their 
hypotheses  would  collapse  if  we  do  not  make  culture 
begin  with  the  Totemic  Parricide.  To  the  psycho- 
analyst the  (Edipus  complex  is,  as  we  know,  the 
foundation  of  all  culture.  This  must  mean  to  them 
not  only  that  the  complex  governs  all  cultural 
phenomena    but    also    that    it    preceded    them    all 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &     ANTHROPOLOGY     163 

temporarily.  The  complex  is  the  fons  et  origo  out  of 
which  there  has  grown  the  totemic  order,  the  first 
elements  of  law,  the  beginnings  of  ritual,  the  institution 
of  mother-right,  everything  in  fact  which  to  the  general 
anthropologist  and  to  the  psycho-analyst  counts  as 
the  first  elements  of  culture.  Dr.  Jones  objects, 
moreover,  to  my  attempt  at  tracing  any  cultural 
causes  of  the  (Edipus  complex  just  because  this  complex 
antedates  all  culture.  But  it  is  obvious  that  if  the 
complex  has  preceded  all  cultural  phenomena,  then 
a  fortiori  the  totemic  crime,  which  is  the  cause  of 
the  complex,  must  be  placed  still  further  back. 

After  having  thus  established  that  the  event  must 
have  happened  before  culture,  we  are  faced  with  the 
other  alternative  of  our  dilemma  :  could  that  totemic 
crime  have  happened  in  the  state  of  nature  ?  Could 
it  have  left  traces  in  tradition  and  culture,  which 
ex  hypothesi  did  not  exist  at  that  time  ?  As  indicated 
above,  we  would  have  to  assume  that  by  one  act 
of  collective  parricide  the  Ape  had  attained  culture 
and  become  Man.  Or  again,  that  by  the  same  act 
they  acquired  the  so-called  racial  memory,  a  new 
super-animal  endowment. 

Let  us  analyze  this  now  in  more  detail.  In  the 
family  life  of  a  pre-human  anthropoid  species  each 
link  in  the  chain  of  instincts  is  released  as  soon  as 
it  ceases  to  be  serviceable.  Past  instinctive  attitudes 
leave  no  active  traces,  and  neither  conflict  nor  complex 


i64  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

attitudes  are  possible.  These  assertions  should,  I 
submit,  be  further  tested  by  the  student  of  animal 
psychology,  but  they  embody  all  that  we  know  about 
the  subject.  If  this  be  so,  however,  we  have  to  challenge 
the  premises  of  Freud's  Cyclopean  h5^otheses.  Why 
should  the  father  have  to  expel  the  sons  if  they 
naturally  and  instinctively  are  inclined  to  leave  the 
the  family  as  soon  as  they  have  no  more  need  of 
parental  protection  ?  Why  should  they  lack  females, 
if  from  other  groups,  as  well  as  from  their  own,  adult 
children  of  the  other  sex  have  also  to  come  out  ? 
Why  should  the  young  males  remain  hanging  around 
the  parental  horde,  why  should  they  hate  the  father 
and  desire  his  death  ?  As  we  know  they  are  glad  to 
be  free  and  they  have  no  wish  to  return  to  the  parental 
horde.  Why  should  they  finally  even  attempt  or 
accomplish  the  cumbersome  and  unpleasant  act  of 
killing  the  old  male,  while  by  merely  waiting  for  his 
retirement  they  might  gain  a  free  access  to  the  horde 
should  they  so  desire  ? 

Each  of  these  questions  challenges  one  of  the  un- 
warranted assumptions  implied  in  Freud's  h5^othesis. 
Freud  in  fact  burdens  his  Cyclopean  family  with  a 
number  of  tendencies,  habits,  and  mental  attitudes 
which  would  constitute  a  lethal  endowment  for  any 
animal  species.  It  is  clear  that  such  a  view  is  untenable 
on  biological  grounds.  We  cannot  assume  the 
existence   in   the   state   of  nature   of   an   anthropoid 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &     ANTHROPOLOGY     165 

species  in  which  the  most  important  business  of 
propagation  is  regulated  by  a  system  of  instincts 
hostile  to  every  interest  of  the  species.  It  is 
easy  to  perceive  that  the  primeval  horde  has  been 
equipped  with  all  the  bias,  maladjustments  and  ill- 
tempers  of  a  middle-class  European  family,  and  then 
let  loose  in  a  prehistoric  jungle  to  run  riot  in  a  most 
attractive  but  fantastic  hypothesis. 

Let  us  5aeld,  however,  to  the  temptation  of  Freud's 
inspiring  speculations  and  admit  for  the  sake  of  the 
argument  that  the  primeval  crime  had  been  committed. 
Even  then  we  are  faced  by  insurmountable  difficulties 
in  accepting  the  consequences.  As  we  saw,  we  are 
asked  to  beUeve  that  the  totemic  crime  produces 
remorse  which  is  expressed  in  the  sacrament  of  endo- 
cannibalistic  totemic  feast,  and  in  the  institution 
of  sexual  taboo.  This  impUes  that  the  parricidal 
sons  had  a  conscience.  But  conscience  is  a  most 
unnatural  mental  trait  imposed  upon  man  by  culture. 
It  also  impUes  that  they  had  the  possibilities  of 
legislating,  of  establishing  moral  values,  religious 
ceremonies  and  social  bonds.  All  of  which  again  it  is 
impossible  to  assume  or  imagine,  for  the  simple  reason 
that  ex  hypothesi  the  events  are  happening  in 
pre-cultural  milieu,  and  culture,  we  must  remember, 
cannot  be  created  in  one  moment  and  by  one  act. 

The  actual  transition  from  the  state  of  nature  into  that 
of  culture  was  not  done  by  one  leap,  it  was  not  a  rapid 


i66  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

process,  certainly  not  a  sharp  transition.  We  have 
to  imagine  the  early  developments  of  the  first  elements 
of  culture — speech,  tradition,  material  inventions, 
conceptual  thought — as  a  very  laborious  and  very  slow 
process  achieved  in  a  cumulative  manner  by  infinitely 
many,  infinitely  small  steps  integrated  over  enormous 
stretches  of  time.  This  process  we  cannot  try  to 
reconstruct  in  detail,  but  we  can  state  the  relevant 
factors  of  the  change,  we  can  analyze  the  situation  of 
early  human  culture  and  indicate  within  certain  limits 
the  mechanism  by  which  it  came  about. 

To  sum  up  our  critical  analysis  :  we  have  found  that 
the  totemic  crime  must  have  been  placed  at  the  very 
origins  of  culture  ;  that  it  must  be  made  the  first  cause 
of  culture  if  it  is  to  have  any  sense  at  all.  This  means 
that  we  have  to  assume  the  crime  and  its  consequences 
as  happening  still  in  the  state  of  nature,  but  such  an 
assumption  involves  us  in  a  number  of  contradictions. 
We  find  that  there  is  in  reality  a  complete  absence 
of  motive  for  a  parricidal  crime,  since  the  working  of 
instincts  is  in  animal  conditions  well  adjusted  to  the 
situation  ;  since  it  leads  to  conflicts  but  not  to  repressed 
mental  states  ;  since  concretely  the  sons  have  no  reason 
for  hefting  their  father  after  they  have  left  the  horde. 
In  the  second  place  we  have  seen  that  in  the  state  of 
nature  there  is  also  a  complete  absence  of  any  means 
by  which  the  consequences  of  the  totemic  crime  could 
have  been  fixed  into  the  cultural  institutions.    There 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &     ANTHROPOLOGY     167 

is  a  complete  absence  of  any  cultural  medium  in 
which  ritual,  laws,  and  morals  could  have  been 
embodied. 

Both  objections  could  be  summarized  in  the  verdict 
that  it  is  impossible  to  assume  origins  of  culture 
as  one  creative  act  by  which  culture,  fully  armed, 
springs  into  being  out  of  one  crime,  cataclysm  or 
rebellion. 

In  our  criticism  we  have  concentrated  our  attention 
on  what  appears  to  be  the  most  fundamental 
objection  to  Freud's  hypothesis,  an  objection 
connected  with  the  very  nature  of  culture  and  of 
cultural  process.  Several  other  objections  of  detail 
could  be  registered  against  this  hypothesis  but  they 
have  been  already  set  forth  in  an  excellent  article 
of  Professor  Kroeber's  in  which  the  anthropological 
as  well  as  the  psycho-analytical  inconsistencies  of  the 
hypothesis  are  lucidly  and  convincingly  listed.^ 

There  is,  however,  one  more  capital  difficulty  in  which 
psycho-analysis  involves  itself  by  its  speculations  on 
totemic  origins.  If  the  real  cause  of  the  CEdipus 
complex  and  of  culture  into  the  bargain  is  to  be 
sought  in  that  traumatic  act  of  birth  by  parricide  ; 
if  the  complex  merely  survived  in  the  "  race  memory 
of  mankind  " — then  the  complex  ought  obviously 
to  wear  out  with  time.    On  Freud's  theory  the  CEdipus 

^  "  Totem  and  Taboo,  an  Ethnologic  Psychoanalysis,"  American 
Anthropologist,   1920,  pp.  48  seqq. 


i68  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

complex  should  have  been  a  dreadful  reality  at  first, 
a  haunting  memory  later,  but  in  the  highest  culture 
it  should  tend  to  disappear. 

This  corrollary  seems  inescapable,  but  there  is  no 
need  of  driving  it  home  dialectically,  for  Dr.  Jones  gives 
it  a  full  and  lucid  expression  in  his  article.  According 
to  him  patriarchy,  the  social  organization  of  the  highest 
cultures,  marks  indeed  the  happy  solution  of  all  the 
difficulties  due  to  the  primeval  crime. 

"  The  patriarchal  system,  as  we  know  it,  betokens 
acknowledging  the  supremacy  of  the  father  and  yet 
the  ability  to  accept  this  even  with  affection,  without 
having  recourse  to  a  system  either  of  mother-right  or 
of  complicated  taboos.  It  means  the  taming  of  man, 
the  gradual  assimilation  of  the  (Edipus  complex. 
At  last  man  could  face  his  real  father  and  live  with 
him.  Well  might  Freud  say  that  the  recognition  of 
the  father's  place  in  the  family  signified  the  most 
important  progress  in  cultural  development."  ^ 

Thus  Dr.  Jones,  and  on  his  authority  Freud  himself, 
has  drawn  the  inevitable  consequence.  They  admit 
that  within  their  scheme  patriarchal  culture — the  one 
most  distant  from  the  original  course  of  the  complex — 
is  also  the  one  where  the  gradual  assimilation  of  the 
"  (Edipus  complex "  has  been  achieved.  This  fits 
perfectly  well  into  the  scheme  of  Totem  and  Taboo. 
But   how   does    it  fit    into   the    general    scheme    of 

^  Jones,  loc  cit.,  p.  130. 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &     ANTHROPOLOGY     169 

psycho-analysis    and   how  does  it  bear  the  hght    of 
anthropology  ? 

As  to  the  first  question,  was  not  the  existence  of  the 
(Edipus  complex  discovered  in  one  of  our  modem 
patriarchal  societies  ?  Is  this  complex  not  day  by  day 
being  re-discovered  in  the  countless  individual  psycho- 
analyses carried  on  all  over  the  modem  patriarchal 
world  ?  A  psycho-analyst  should  no  doubt  be  the  last 
to  answer  these  questions  in  the  negative.  The  (Edipus 
complex  does  not  seem  to  have  been  so  well  "  assimi- 
lated "  after  all.  Even  if  it  be  admitted  that  a  great 
deal  of  exaggeration  exists  in  psycho-analytic  findings 
we  have  ordinary  sociological  observation  to  vindicate 
the  claim  of  psycho-analysis  on  this  point.  But  the 
psycho-analyst  cannot  have  it  both  ways.  He  cannot 
try  to  cure  most  ills  of  the  individual  mind  and  of 
society  by  dragging  their  family  maladjustments  out 
of  the  sub-conscious,  while  at  the  same  time  he  cheer- 
fully assures  us  that  "  the  supremacy  of  the  father 
is  fully  acknowledged  in  our  society  "  and  that  it  is 
accepted  "  even  with  affection  ".  Indeed,  extreme 
patriarchal  institutions  in  which  patria  potestas  is 
carried  to  its  bitter  end  are  the  very  soil  for  typical 
family  maladjustments.  The  psycho-analysts  have 
been  busy  proving  that  to  us  from  Shakespeare  and 
the  Bible,  from  Roman  history  and  from  Greek 
mythology.  Did  not  the  very  eponjmious  hero 
of  the  complex — if  such  an  extension  of  the  term  be 


170  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

allowed — live  in  a  society  pronouncedly  patriarchal  ? 
And  was  not  his  tragedy  based  on  the  father's  jealousy 
and  superstitious  fear — motives  which,  by  the  way,  are 
typically  sociological  ?  Could  the  myth  or  the  tragedy 
unfold  before  us  with  the  same  powerful  and  fatal 
effect,  unless  we  felt  the  puppets  moved  by  a 
patriarchal  destiny  ? 

Most  modem  neuroses,  the  dreams  of  patients,  the 
myths  of  Indo-Germanic  peoples,  our  literatures  and 
our  patriarchal  creeds  have  been  interpreted  in  terms 
of  the  CEpidus  complex — i.e.  under  the  assumption 
that  in  pronounced  father-right  the  son  never  recognizes 
"  the  father's  place  in  the  family  ";  that  he  does  not 
like  to  "  face  his  real  father  ";  that  he  is  unable  to 
"  live  with  him  "  in  peace.  Surely  psycho-analysis 
as  theory  and  as  practice  stands  and  falls  with  the 
truth  of  the  contention  that  our  modem  culture 
suffers  from  the  maladjustments  covered  by  the  term 
(Edipus  complex. 

What  has  anthropology  to  say  about  the  optimistic 
view  expressed  in  the  passage  quoted  above  ?  If 
the  patriarchal  regime  means  the  happy  solution  of 
the  (Edipus  complex,  the  stage  when  man  could  face 
his  father,  and  so  on — then  where  on  earth  does  the 
complex  exist  in  an  unassimilated  form  ?  That  it  is 
"  deflected "  under  mother-right  has  been  proved 
in  the  first  two  parts  of  this  book  and  it  has  been 
independently   re-vindicated   by    Dr.    Jones   himself. 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &    ANTHROPOLOGY     171 

Whether  the  CEdipus  complex  in  its  full  splendour  does 
exist  in  a  culture  never  studied  empirically  from  this 
point  of  view  is  an  idle  question.  The  object  of  the 
present  work  has  been  partly  to  stimulate  field  workers 
to  further  research.  What  such  an  empirical  study 
might  or  might  not  reveal  I  for  one  shall  not  try  to  fore- 
tell. But  it  seems  to  me  that  to  deny  the  problem,  to 
cover  it  up  with  an  obviously  inadequate  assumption, 
and  to  obliterate  as  much  as  has  been  already  done 
towards  its  solution,  is  not  to  render  a  service  either 
to  anthropology  or  to  psycho-analysis. 

I  have  pointed  out  a  series  of  contradictions  and 
obscurities  in  the  psycho-analytic  approach  to  this 
question,  taking  Dr.  Jones's  interesting  contribution 
as  my  main  text.  Such  inconsistencies  are  :  the  idea 
of  a  "  repressed  complex "  ;  the  assertion  that 
mother-right  and  ignorance  of  paternity  are  corre- 
lated and  yet  independent ;  the  view  that  patriarchy 
is  a  happy  solution  of  the  (Edipus  complex  as 
well  as  its  cause.  All  these  discrepancies  centre  in 
my  opinion  round  the  doctrine  that  the  (Edipus 
complex  is  the  vera  causa  of  social  and  cultural 
phenomena  instead  of  being  the  result ;  that  it  originated 
in  the  primeval  crime  ;  that  it  continued  in  racial 
memory  as  a  system  of  inherited,  collective  tendencies. 
I  would  like  to  indicate  just  one  more  point.  Taken 
as  a  real  historical  fact,  that  is  one  which  has  to  be 
placed  in  space  and  time  and  concrete  circumstance, 


172  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

how  is  the  primitive  parricide  to  be  imagined  ?  Have 
we  to  assume  that  once  upon  a  time,  in  one  super- 
horde,  at  one  spot,  one  crime  had  been  committed  ? 
That  this  crime  then  created  culture  and  that  this 
culture  spread  all  over  the  world  by  primeval  diffusion, 
changing  apes  into  men  wherever  it  reached  ?  This 
assumption  falls  to  the  ground  as  soon  as  formulated. 
The  alternative  is  equally  difficult  to  imagine  :  it  is 
a  sort  of  epidemic  of  minor  parricides  occurring  all 
over  the  world,  each  horde  going  on  with  its  Cyclopean 
tyranny  and  then  breaking  into  crime  and  thus  into 
culture.  The  more  we  look  at  the  hypothesis  concretely, 
the  more  we  try  to  elaborate  it,  the  less  do  we  feel 
inclined  to  treat  it  as  anything  but  a  "  Just-so  story  ", 
as  Professor  Kroeber  has  called  it,  an  appellation  not 
resented  by  Freud  himself.^ 

*  Compare  Freud's  Group  Psychology  and  the  Analysis  of  the  Ego, 
Sign.  Freud,  1922,  p.  90.  The  name  of  Professor  Kroeber  is  mis- 
spelled into  "  Kroeger  "  right  through  all  the  successive  editions. 
One  might  inquire  what  is  the  psycho-analytic  cause  of  this  lapse 
on  the  principle  developed  in  The  Psych '^pathology  of  Everyday  Life, 
that  no  mistake  is  without  its  motive.  It  is  almost  unpardonable 
that  this  misprint  of  the  name  of  a  leading  American  scholar  has 
been  carried  over  into  the  American  translation  of  Freud's  book  ! 


VI 

COMPLEX    OR    SENTIMENT? 

T  HAVE,  up  to  now,  used  the  word  "  complex  "  to 
denote  the  typical  attitudes  towards  members 
of  the  family.  I  have  even  retrimmed  it  into  a  new 
expression,  the  Nuclear  Family  Complex,  which  is 
intended  to  be  a  generalization,  applicable  to  various 
cultures,  of  the  term  CEdipus  complex,  whose  applica- 
bility, I  maintain,  is  restricted  to  the  Aryan,  patriarchal 
society.  But,  in  the  interests  of  scientific  nomenclature, 
I  shall  have  to  sacrifice  this  new  compound,  Nuclear 
Family  Complex,  for  not  only  is  it  advisable  never  to 
introduce  new  terms,  but  it  is  always  a  laudable  act 
to  expurgate  science  of  any  terminological  intruder, 
if  it  can  be  proved  that  it  is  jumping  the  claim  of 
one  already  established.  I  believe  that  the  word 
"  complex "  carries  with  it  certain  implications 
which  make  it  altogether  unsuitable,  except  as  a 
scientific  colloquialism — what  the  Germans  call  Schlag- 
wort.  At  the  least  we  must  make  clear  what  we 
mean  by  it. 

The  word  "  complex  "  dates  from  a  certain  phase 
of  psycho-analysis  when  this  was  still  in  close  associa- 
tion with  therapy,  when  it  was  in  fact  not  much  more 
than   a   method   of   treating   neurosis.      "  Complex  " 

173 


174  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

meant  the  pathogenous,  repressed  emotional  attitude 
of  the  patient.  But  it  has  now  become  questionable 
whether  in  general  psychology  one  can  sever  and  isolate 
the  repressed  part  of  a  man's  attitude  towards  a 
person,  and  treat  it  separately  from  the  non-repressed 
elements.  In  our  study,  we  have  found  that  the  various 
emotions  which  constitute  the  attitude  towards  a- 
person  are  so  closely  connected  and  intertwined  that 
they  form  a  closely  knit  organic  insoluble  system. 
Thus,  in  relation  to  the  father,  the  feelings  which  make 
up  veneration  and  idealization  are  essentially  bound 
up  with  the  dislike,  hatred  or  scorn  which  are  their 
reflections.  These  negative  feelings  are  in  fact  partly 
reactions  to  an  over-strained  exaltation  of  the  father, 
shadows  cast  into  the  unconscious  by  the  too  glaring 
idealization  of  the  non-ideal  father.  To  sever  the 
shadow  from  the  part  which  is  in  the  "  foreconscious  " 
and  that  which  is  in  the  unconscious  is  impossible; 
they  are  indissolubly  connected.  The  psycho-analyst 
in  his  consultation  room  can  perhaps  neglect  the  open, 
obvious  elements  of  the  attitude  which  contribute 
nothing  further  to  the  malady ;  he  can  isolate  the 
repressed  oijes  and  make  of  them  an  entity,  calling  it 
a  complex.  But  as  soon  as  he  leaves  his  neurotic 
patients  and  enters  the  lecture  room  with  a  general 
psychological  theory,  he  might  as  well  realize  that 
complexes  do  not  exist,  that  certainly  they  do  not  lead 
an  independent  existence  in  the  unconscious  and  that 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &     ANTHROPOLOGY     175 

they  are  only  part  of  an  organic  whole,  of  which 
the  essential  constituents  are  not  repressed  at  all. 

As  a  sociologist  I  am  not  here  concerned  with  the 
pathological  results,  but  with  their  normal,  ordinary 
foundations.  And,  although  it  was  better  to  leave 
this  theoretical  analysis  till  now,  when  we  can  sub- 
stantiate it  by  fact,  yet  throughout  our  account  of 
family  influences,  I  have  clearly  indicated  the  "  fore- 
conscious  "  as  well  as  the  unconscious  elements. 
Psycho-analysis  has  the  great  merit  of  having  shown 
that  the  typical  sentiments  towards  father  and  mother 
include  negative  as  well  as  positive  elements  ;  that 
they  have  a  repressed  portion,  as  well  as  one  above  the 
surface  of  consciousness.  But  this  must  not  make  us 
forget  that  both  portions  are  equally  important. 

Since  we  see  that  the  conception  of  an  isolated 
repressed  attitude  is  useless  in  sociology,  we  must  try 
to  gain  a  clear  vision  of  how  we  can  generalize  it 
and  with  what  psychological  doctrines  we  should  link 
up  our  conception  of  what  we  had  hitherto  called 
"  nuclear  family  complex  ",  and  which  includes  besides 
"  unconscious  "  also  overt  elements.  I  have  indicated 
clearly  that  certain  new  tendencies  of  modern 
psychology  have  a  special  affinity  to  psycho-analysis. 
I  meant,  of  course,  the  very  important  advance  of 
knowledge  about  our  emotional  life,  inaugurated  by 
Mr.  A.  F.  Shand  in  his  theory  of  sentiments  and 
developed  later  by  Stout,  Westermarck,  McDougall, 


176  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

and  a  few  others.  Mr.  Shand  was  the  first  to  reahze 
that  emotiorts  cannot  be  treated  as  loose  elements, 
unconnected  and  unorganized,  floating  in  our  mental 
medium  to  make  now  and  then  an  isolated  and 
accidental  appearance.  His  theory,  as  well  as  all 
the  newer  work  on  emotions,  is  based  on  the  principle 
first  enunciated  by  himself :  .  namely,  that  our 
emotional  life  is  definitely  co-ordinated  with  the 
environment ;  that  a  number  of  things  and  persons 
claim  our  emotional  responses.  Round  each 
person  or  object  the  emotions  are  organized  into  a 
definite  system — the  love  or  hate  or  devotion  we 
feel  for  a  parent,  a  country  or  a  life-pursuit.  Such 
a  system  of  organized  emotions  Mr.  Shand  calls  a 
sentiment.  The  ties  which  bind  us  to  the  various 
members  of  our  family,  patriotism,  ideals  of  truth, 
righteousness,  devotion  to  science — all  these  are 
sentiments.  And  the  life  of  every  man  is  dominated  by 
a  limited  number  of  these  sentiments.  The  theory  of 
sentiments  was  first  outlined  by  Mr.  Shand  in  one  or  two 
short  essays  which  must  be  regarded  as  epoch-making, 
and  which  later  were  expanded  into  a  large  volume.^ 
In  his  book,  Mr.  Shand  assumes  an  innate  predisposition 
for  a  few  systems  such  as  love  and  hate,  into  each  of 
which  there  enter  a  number  of  emotions.  Every 
emotion  again  is  to  Mr.   Shand  a   complex  type  of 

*  "  Character  and  the  Emotions  ",  in  Mind,  new  series,  vol.  i,  and 
The  Foundations  of  Character,  1st  edn.,  1917. 


PSYCHO-ANALYSIS    &    ANTHROPOLOGY     177 

mental  response  to  a  definite  type  of  situation,  so  that 
every  emotion  has  at  its  command  a  number  of 
instinctive  reactions.  Mr.  Shand's  theory  of  senti- 
ments will  always  remain  of  paramount  importance 
for  the  sociologist,  since  social  bonds  as  well  as  cultural 
values  are  sentiments  standardized  under  the  influence 
of  tradition  and  culture.  In  the  study  of  family  life, 
as  it  develops  in  two  different  civilizations,  we  have 
given  a  concrete  application  of  the  Shandian  principles, 
the  theory  of  sentiments  with  reference  to  a  definite 
social  problem.  We  have  seen  how  the  child's  attitude 
towards  the  most  important  items  in  his  environment  is 
gradually  formed,  and  we  have  examined  the  influences 
which  contribute  towards  its  formation.  The  correction 
and  addition  which  psycho-analysis  has  allowed  us  to 
make  to  Mr.  Shand's  theory  is  the  consideration  of  the 
repressed  elements  of  a  sentiment.  But  these  repressed 
elements  cannot  be  isolated  into  a  water-tight  con- 
partment,  and  they  cannot  as  a  "  complex  "  be  regarded 
as  something  different  and  distinguishable  from  the 
"  sentiment  ".  We  see,  therefore,  that  the  theory 
to  which  we  must  attach  our  results  in  order  to  put  them 
on  a  sound  theoretical  basis  is  Shand's  theory  of  the 
sentiments,  and  that  instead  of  speaking  of  a  "  nuclear 
complex  "  we  should  have  to  speak  of  the  family 
sentiments,  of  kinship  ties,  typical  of  a  given  society. 

The  attitudes  or  sentiments  towards  father,  mother, 
sister  and  brother  do  not  grow  up  isolated,  detached 


178  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

from  one  another.  The  organic,  indissoluble  unity 
of  the  family  welds  also  the  psychological  sentiments 
towards  its  members  into  one  connected  system.  This 
is  shown  very  clearly  by  our  results.  Thus  the 
expression  "  nuclear  family  complex  "  is  equivalent 
to  the  conception  of  a  correlated  system  of  sentiments, 
or,  shortly,  of  a  configuration  of  sentiments,  typical 
in  a  patriarchal  or  a  matriarchal  society. 


PART    IV 

INSTINCT   AND   CULTURE 

I 

THE  TRANSITION  FROM  NATURE  TO  CULTURE 

TN  the  foregoing  part  of  this  book,  in  which  we  have 
been  mainly  concerned  with  the  discussion  of 
certain  psycho-analytic  views,  our  results  have  been 
mainly  critical :  we  have  tried  to  establish  the  principle 
that  in  a  pre-cultural  condition  there  is  no  medium 
in  which  social  institutions,  morals,  and  religion  could 
be  moulded  ;  that  there  is  no  memory  mechanism  by 
which  to  maintain  and  to  transmit  the  institutions 
after  they  have  been  established.  The  position  reached 
is  perhaps  unassailable  to  those  who  really  under- 
stand the  crucial  fact  that  culture  cannot  be  created 
by  one  act  or  in  one  moment  and  that  institutions, 
morals,  and  religion  could  not  be  conjured  up,  even 
by  the  greatest  cataclysm,  among  animals  who  have 
not  yet  emerged  from  the  state  of  nature.  But  naturally 
we  are  not  satisfied  merely  with  denying  but  also 
want  to  affirm.  We  do  not  merely  wish  to  point  out 
mistakes,  but  we  want  to  throw  light  on  the  actual 
process.  To  this  end  we  have  to  analyze  the 
relation  between  cultural  and  natural  processes. 

179 


i8o  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

The  type  of  behaviour  under  culture  differs 
essentially  from  animal  behaviour  in  the  state  of  nature. 
Man,  however  simple  his  culture,  disposes  of  a  material 
outfit  of  implements,  weapons,  domestic  chattels ; 
he  moves  within  a  social  milieu  which  gives  him  help 
and  controls  him  in  turn  ;  he  communicates  by  speech 
and  thus  develops  concepts  of  a  rational  religious  and 
magical  character.  Thus  man  disposes  of  a  body  of 
material  possessions,  lives  within  a  type  of  social 
organization,  communicates  by  language,  and  is  moved 
by  systems  of  spiritual  values.  These  are  perhaps  the 
four  main  headings  under  which  we  usually  classify 
the  body  of  man's  cultural  achievements.  Thus  culture 
appears  to  us  when  we  meet  it  as  a  fact  already  accom- 
plished. And  let  us  clearly  and  explicitly  recognize 
that  we  never  can  observe  it  in  statu  nascendi.  Nor 
is  it  at  all  profitable  to  manufacture  hypotheses  about 
the  "  original  events  of  cultural  birth  ".  What  can 
we  do  then  in  trying  to  reflect  upon  the  beginnings  of 
human  culture,  that  is  if  we  want  to  do  it  without 
having  recourse  to  any  extravagant  hypotheses  or 
unwarrantable  assumptions  ?  There  is  one  important 
thing  to  do,  namely,  to  indicate  what  part  various 
factors  of  cultural  development  have  played  in  the 
process  ;  what  they  imply  in  psychological  modification 
of  man's  endowment,  and  in  what  way  non- 
psychological  elements  can  influence  this  endowment. 
For  the  factors  of  cultural  development  are  intertwined 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  i8i 

and  essentially  dependent  upon  each  other,  and  while 
we  have  no  knowledge  and  no  indications  about 
sequences  in  development,  while  in  all  speculations 
about  beginnings  the  element  of  time  entirely  escapes 
our  intellectual  control,  we  can  yet  study  the  correlations 
of  the  factors  and  thus  gain  a  great  deal  of  information. 
We  have  to  study  these  correlations  in  full  cultural 
development,  but  we  can  trace  them  back  into  more  and 
more  primitive  forms.  If  we  thus  arrive  at  a  fixed 
scheme  of  dependence,  if  certain  lines  of  correlation 
appear  in  all  cultural  phenomena,  we  can  say  that 
any  hypothesis  which  violates  these  laws  must  be 
considered  void.  More  than  this  :  if  the  laws  of  all 
cultural  process  disclose  to  us  the  paramount  influence 
of  certain  factors,  we  must  assume  that  these  factors 
have  also  been  controlling  the  origins  of  culture.  In 
this  sense  the  concept  of  origins  does  not  imply  priority 
in  time  or  causal  effectiveness,  but  merely  indicates 
the  universal  presence  of  certain  active  factors  at 
all  stages  of  development,  hence  also  at  the  beginning. 
Let  us  start  with  the  recognition  that  the  main 
categories  of  culture  must  from  the  very  outset  have 
been  intertwined  and  simultaneously  at  work.  They 
could  not  have  originated  one  after  the  other,  and  they 
cannot  be  placed  in  any  scheme  of  temporal  sequence. 
Material  culture,  for  instance,  could  not  have  come  into 
being  before  man  was  able  to  use  his  implements  in 
traditional  technique  which,  as  we  know,  implies  the 


i82  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

existence  of  knowledge.  Knowledge  again  and  tradition 
are  impossible  without  conceptual  thought  and 
language.  Language,  thought,  and  material  culture  are 
thus  correlated,  and  must  have  been  so  at  any  stage 
of  development,  hence  also  at  the  beginnings  of  culture. 
The  material  arrangements  of  living,  again,  such  as 
housing,  household  implements,  means  of  carrying  on 
daily  life,  are  essential  correlates  and  prerequisites  of 
social  organization.  The  hearth  and  the  threshold 
not  only  symbolically  stand  for  family  life,  but  are 
real  social  factors  in  the  formation  of  kinship  bonds. 
Morals,  again,  constitute  a  force  without  which  man 
could  not  battle  against  his  impulses  or  even  go  beyond 
his  instinctive  endowment,  and  that  he  has  to  do 
constantly  under  culture  even  in  his  simplest  technical 
activities.  It  is  the  changes  in  instinctive  endowment 
which  interest  us  most  in  this  context,  for  here  we  touch 
the  question  of  repressed  drives,  of  modified  impulsive 
tendencies,  that  is,  the  domain  of  the  "  unconscious  ". 
I  shall  try  to  show  that  the  neglect  to  study  what 
happens  to  human  instincts  under  culture  is  responsible 
for  the  fantastic  hypothesis  advanced  to  account 
for  the  (Edipus  complex.  It  will  be  my  aim  to  show  that 
the  beginning  of  culture  implies  the  repression  of 
instincts,  and  that  all  the  essentials  of  the  (Edipus 
complex  or  any  other  "  complex  "  are  necessary  by- 
products in  the  process  of  the  gradual  formation  of 
culture. 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  183 

To  this  end  I  shall  try  to  show  that  between  the 
human  parent  and  child  under  conditions  of  culture 
there  must  arise  incestuous  temptations  which  are  not 
likely  to  occur  in  animal  families  governed  by  true 
instincts.  I  shall  also  estabhsh  that  these  temptations 
have  to  be  met  and  ruthlessly  repressed  in  mankind, 
since  incest  and  organized  family  life  are  incompatible. 
Again,  culture  implies  an  education  which  cannot 
be  carried  on  without  coercive  authority.  This 
authority  in  human  society  is  supplied  within  the 
family  by  the  father,  and  the  attitude  between  father 
and  son  gives  rise  to  suppressed  hatred  and  other 
elements  of  the  complex. 


II 

THE  FAMILY  AS  THE  CRADLE  OF  NASCENT 
CULTURE 

npHE  fundamental  change  in  the  mechanism  of 
instinctive  responses  has  to  be  studied  upon  the  very 
subject  matter  of  our  present  inquiry  :  the  early  forms 
of  family  life  and  the  transition  between  animal  and 
human  family.  Upon  the  human  family  are  focussed 
all  psycho-analytic  interests  and  the  family  is,  in  the 
opinion  of  an  anthropological  school  to  which  the 
writer  belongs,  the  most  important  group  in  primitive 
societies.!  The  following  comparison  of  courtship, 
mating,  matrimonial  relations  and  parental  cares  in 

^  It  is  clear  that  in  this  statement,  as  throughout  the  book,  I  imply 
that  the  tj^ical  form  of  the  human  family  is  based  on  monogamous 
marriage.  The  wide  prevalence  of  monogamy  in  all  human  societies 
is  also  assumed  by  Dr.  Lowie  in  his  Primitive  Society  (see  especially 
chapter  iii).  A  very  interesting  and  important  contribution  to  the 
problem  is  to  be  found  in  Capt.  Pitt-Rivers's  Contact  of  Races 
and  Clash  of  Culture,  1927  (see  especially  chapters  viii,  sees.  1,  2,  3, 
and  xi,  sec.  1).  Capt.  Pitt- Rivers  urges  the  biological  and  socio- 
logical importance  of  polygyny  at  the  lower  levels  of  culture. 
Without  fully  accepting  his  view,  I  admit  that  the  problem  will 
have  to  be  rediscussed  from  the  point  of  view  advanced  by  him. 
I  still  maintain,  however,  that  the  importance  of  polygyny  is  to 
be  found  in  the  role  which  it  plays  in  differentiating  the  higher  from 
the  lower  classes  in  a  society  ;  the  plurality  of  wives  allows  a  chief 
to  obtain  economic  and  political  advantages  and  thus  provides  a 
basis  for  distinctions  of  rank. 

184 


INSTINCT  AND  CULTURE  185 

animal  and  human  societies  respectively,  will  show 
in  what  sense  the  family  must  be  considered  as  the  cell 
of  society,  as  the  starting  point  of  all  human 
organization. 

There  is  one  point  which  must  be  settled  before  we 
can  conveniently  proceed  with  our  argument.  Very 
often  it  is  assumed  by  anthropologists  that  humanity 
developed  from  a  gregarious  simian  species  and  that 
man  inherited  from  his  animal  ancestors  the  so-called 
"  herd  instincts  ".  Now  this  hypothesis  is  entirely 
incompatible  with  the  view  here  taken  that  common 
sociability  develops  by  extension  of  the  family  bonds 
and  from  no  other  sources.  Until  it  has  been  shown  that 
the  assumption  of  pre-cultural  gregariousness  is  entirely 
unfounded  ;  until  a  radical  difference  in  nature  is 
shown  between  human  sociability,  which  is  a  cultural 
achievement,  and  animal  gregariousness,  which  is  an 
innate  endowment,  it  is  futile  to  show  how  social 
organization  develops  out  of  early  kinship  groups. 
Instead  of  having  to  face  the  "  herd  instinct  "  at  every 
turn  of  our  argument  and  show  its  inadequacy  then 
and  there,  it  is  best  to  deal  with  this  mistaken  point  of 
view  from  the  outset. 

It  is  idle,  I  believe,  to  consider  the  purely  zoo- 
logical question  whether  our  pre-human  ancestors 
lived  in  big  herds  and  were  endowed  with  the 
necessary  innate  tendencies  which  allow  animals  to 
cb-operate  in  herds,  or  whether  they  lived  in  single 


i86  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

families.  The  question  we  have  to  answer  is  whether 
any  forms  of  human  organization  can  be  derived  from 
any  animal  types  of  herding  ;  that  is  whether  organized 
behaviour  can  be  traced  back  to  any  forms  of  animal 
gregariousness  or  "  herd-instinct  " 

Let  us  first  consider  animal  gregariousness.  It  is  a 
fact  that  a  number  of  animal  species  are  so  constituted 
that  they  have  to  lead  their  life  in  more  or  less  numerous 
groups,  and  that  they  solve  the  main  problems  of  their 
existence  by  innate  forms  of  co-operation.  Can  we  say 
with  regard  to  such  animal  species  that  they  possess  a 
specific  '  herd  '  or  '  gregarious  '  instinct  ?  All  competent 
definitions  of  instinct  agree  that  it  must  mean  a 
fixed  pattern  of  behaviour,  associated  with  certain 
anatomical  mechanisms  correlated  to  organic  needs 
and  showing  a  general  uniformity  throughout  the 
species.  The  various  specific  methods  by  which  animals 
carry  on  the  process  of  search  for  food,  of  nutrition  ; 
the  series  of  instincts  which  constitute  mating,  the 
rearing  and  education  of  offspring  ;  the  working  of  the 
various  locomotive  arrangements  ;  the  functioning  of 
primitive  defensive  and  offensive  mechanisms, — these 
constitute  instincts.  In  each  we  can  correlate  the 
instinct  with  an  anatomical  apparatus,  with  a 
physiological  mechanism  and  a  specific  aim  in  the  vast 
biological  process  of  individual  and  racial  existence. 
Throughout  the  species  each  individual  will  behave 
in  an  identical  manner,  provided  that  the  conditions 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  187 

of  its  organism  and  the  external  circumstances  are 
present  to  release  the  instinct. 

What  about  gregariousness  ?  It  is  interesting  to 
note  that  we  find  the  division  of  functions,  the 
co-ordination  of  activities,  and  the  general  integration 
of  collective  life  most  pronounced  among  relatively  low 
forms  of  animal  life  such  as  the  insects,  and  also, 
perhaps,  coral  colonies.  (Compare  the  writer's  article 
on  "  Instincts  and  Culture  "  in  Niture,  July  19,  1924.) 
But  neither  with  the  social  insects  nor  with  gregarious 
mammals  do  we  find  a  specific  anatomical  outfit 
subserving  any  specific  act  of  "  herding  ".  The 
collective  behaviour  of  animals  subserves  all  processes, 
it  envelops  all  instincts,  but  it  is  not  a  specific  instinct. 
It  might  be  called  an  innate  component,  a  general 
modification  of  all  instincts  which  makes  the  animals 
of  the  species  co-operate  in  most  vital  affairs.  It  is 
important  to  note  that  in  all  the  collective  behaviour 
of  animals  co-operation  is  governed  by  innate 
adaptations  and  not  by  anything  which  could  be  called 
social  organization  in  the  sense  in  which  we  apply  this 
word  to  humanity.  This  I  have  established  more  fully 
in  the  article  mentioned  above. 

Thus  man  could  not  have  inherited  a  gregarious 
instinct,  which  no  animal  possesses,  but  only  a  diffused 
'  gregariousness  '.  This  would  obviously  mean  that 
man  has  a  general  tendency  to  carry  out  certain 
adaptations    by    collective    rather    than    individual 


i88  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

behaviour,  an  assumption  which  would  not  help  us 
very  much  in  any  concrete  anthropological  problem. 
Yet  even  the  assumption  of  a  tendency  towards 
gregariousness  can  be  shown  to  be  completely 
erroneous.  For  is  there  any  tendency  in  man  to  carry 
out  all  important  acts  in  common ;  or  even  any  well- 
defined  type  of  activity  '  gregariously  '  ?  He  is 
capable  indeed  of  developing  his  powers  of  co-operation 
indefinitely,  of  harnessing  increasing  numbers  of  his 
fellow  creatures  to  one  cultural  task.  But  whatever 
type  of  activity  be  considered,  man  is  also  capable  of 
carrying  on  his  work  in  isolation  if  the  conditions  and 
the  type  of  culture  demand  it.  In  the  processes  con- 
nected with  nutrition  and  the  satisfaction  of  bodily 
wants  we  can  find  every  activity  :  food  gathering, 
fishing,  agriculture,  performed  either  in  groups  or 
alone,  by  collective  labour  as  well  as  by  individual 
effort.  In  carrying  out  the  propagation  of  the  race 
man  is  capable  of  developing  collective  forms  of  sexual 
competition,  of  group  licence  side  by  side  with  strictly 
individual  forms  of  courtship.  The  collective  tending  of 
offspring,  found  at  least  among  insects,  has  no  parallel 
in  human  societies,  where  we  see  individual  parenthood 
devoted  to  the  care  of  individual  children.  Again, 
while  many  ceremonies  of  religion  and  magic  are  per- 
formed in  common,  individual  initiation  rites,  solitary 
experiences  and  personal  revelation  play  as  great  a 
part  in  religion   as   do  collective  forms  of  worship. 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  189 

There  is  no  more  trace  of  gregarious  tendencies  in  the 
domain  of  the  sacred  than  in  any  other  type  of  human 
culture.^  Thus  scrutiny  of  cultural  activities  would 
reveal  no  gregarious  tendencies  of  any  sort.  As  a  matter 
of  fact,  the  further  we  go  back  the  more  the  individual 
character  predominates,  at  least  in  economic  work. 
It  never  becomes  quite  solitary,  however,  and  the 
stage  of  "  individual  search  for  food "  postulated 
by  certain  economists  seems  to  me  to  be  a  fiction  : 
even  at  low  levels  organized  activities  run  always 
side  by  side  with  individual  effort.  But  there 
is  no  doubt  that  as  culture  advances  individual 
activities  gradually  disappear  from  the  economic 
field  and  are  replaced  by  collective  production  on  an 
enormous  scale.  We  would  have  then  a  case  of  an 
'  instinct  '  increasing  with  culture,  which,  as  can  be 
easily  seen,  is  a  reductio  ad  ahsurdum  ! 

Another  way  of  approaching  the  question  of  the 
so-called  '  herd  instinct  '  would  be  to  examine  the 
nature  of  the  bonds  which  unite  men  into  social 
groups.  These  bonds,  whether  political,  legal,  linguistic, 
or  customary  are  one  and  all  of  an  acquired  character  ; 
in  fact,  it  can  be  easily  seen  that  there  is  no  innate 
element  in  them  at  all.  Take  the  bonds  of  speech  which 
unite  groups  of  people  at  all  levels  of  culture   and 

*  This  has  been  worked  out  in  detail  by  myself  in  another 
publication,  "  Magic,  Religion  and  Science  "  in  Science,  Religion 
and  Reality,  Collected  Essays  by  Various  Authors,  edited  by 
J.  Needham,  1925. 


igo  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

sharply  distinguish  them  from  those  with  whom 
it  is  impossible  to  communicate  by  word  of  mouth. 
Language  is  an  entirely  acquired  bodily  habit.  It  is 
not  based  on  any  innate  apparatus,  it  is  completely 
dependent  upon  the  culture  and  the  tradition  of  a 
tribe,  that  is  upon  elements  which  vary  within  the  same 
species,  and  so  cannot  be  specifically  innate.  It  is 
clear,  moreover,  that  no  "  language  instinct  "  could 
have  been  inherited  from  our  animal  ancestors, 
who  never  communicated  by  a  symbolic  con- 
ventional code. 

Whatever  form  of  organized  co-operation  we  take, 
we  see  after  a  brief  scnitiny  that  it  is  based  on  cultural 
artefacts  and  governed  by  conventional  norms.  In 
the  economic  activities,  man  uses  tools  and  proceeds 
according  to  traditional  methods.  The  social  bonds 
which  unite  economic  co-operative  groups  are  therefore 
based  upon  a  completely  cultural  framework.  The  same 
refers  to  an  organization  for  purposes  of  war,  of  religious 
ceremonial,  of  the  enforcement  of  justice.  Nature  could 
not  have  endowed  human  beings  with  specific  responses 
towards  artefacts,  traditional  codes,  symbolic  sounds, 
for  the  simple  reason  that  aU  these  objects  lie  outside 
the  domain  of  nature.  The  forms  and  forces  of  social 
organization  are  imposed  upon  a  human  community 
by  culture  and  not  by  nature.  There  cannot  be  any 
innate  tendency  to  run  a  locomotive  or  to  use  a  machine 
gun,  simply  because  these  implements  cannot  have  been 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  191 

anticipated  by  the  natural  conditions  under  which  the 
human  species  has  been  biologically  fashioned. 

In  all  his  organized  behaviour  man  is  always 
governed  by  those  elements  which  are  outside  any 
natural       endowment.  Psychologically,       human 

organization  is  based  upon  sentiments,  that  is  complex 
built-up  attitudes  and  not  innate  tendencies. 
Technically,  human  association  is  always  correlated 
with  artefacts,  with  tools,  implements,  weapons, 
material  contrivances  all  of  which  extend  beyond  man's 
natural  anatomical  equipment.  Human  sociality  is 
always  a  combination,  a  dove-tailing  of  legal,  political, 
and  cultural  functions.  It  is  not  a  mere  identity  of 
the  emotional  impulse,  not  a  similarity  of  response  to 
the  same  stimulus,  but  an  acquired  habit  dependent 
upon  the  existence  of  an  artificial  set  of  conditions.  All 
this  will  become  clearer  after  our  subsequent  discussion 
of  the  formation  of  social  bonds  out  of  innate 
tendencies  within  the  family. 

To  sum  up,  we  can  say  that  man  obviously  has  to 
behave  in  common  and  that  his  organized  behaviour 
is  one  of  the  comer-stones  of  culture.  But  while 
collective  behaviour  in  animals  is  due  to  innate  equip- 
ment, in  man  it  is  always  a  gradually  built-up  habit. 
Human  sociality  increases  with  culture,  while  if  it  had 
been  mere  gregarious ness  it  should  decrease  or,  at  least, 
remain  constant.  The  fact  is  that  the  essential 
foundation  of  culture  lies  in  a  deep  modification  of 


192  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

innate  endowment  in  which  most  instincts  disappear, 
and  are  replaced  by  plastic  though  directed  tendencies 
which  can  be  moulded  into  cultural  responses.  The 
social  integration  of  these  responses  is  an  important 
part  of  the  process,  but  this  integration  is  possible 
through  the  general  plasticity  of  instincts  and  not 
through  any  specific  gregarious  tendency  ! 

We  may  thus  conclude  that  no  type  of  human 
organization  can  be  traced  back  to  gregarious 
tendencies,  still  less  to  a  specific  '  herd  instinct  '.  We 
shall  be  able  to  show  that  the  necessary  correlate  of 
this  principle  is  that  the  family  is  the  only  type  of 
grouping  which  man  takes  over  from  the  animal.  In 
the  process  of  transmission,  however,  this  unit  changes 
fundamentally  with  regard  to  its  nature  and  con- 
stitution, though  its  form  remains  remarkably  unaltered. 
The  group  of  parents  and  children,  the  permanence  of 
the  maternal  tie,  the  relation  of  father  to  his  offspring, 
show  remarkable  analogies  throughout  human  culture 
and  in  the  world  of  higher  animals.  But  as  the  family 
passes  under  the  control  of  cultural  elements,  the 
instincts  which  have  exclusively  regulated  it  among 
pre-human  apes  become  transformed  into  something 
which  did  not  exist  before  man  :  I  mean  the  cultural 
bonds  of  social  organization.  We  have  now  to 
enquire  into  this  transformation  of  instinctive  responses 
into  cultural  behaviour. 


Ill 

RUT  AND    MATING    IN    ANIMAL    AND    MAN 

T  ET  us  compare  the  chain  of  linked  instinctive 
responses  which  in  animals  constitute  courtship, 
marriage  and  family  with  the  corresponding  human 
institutions.  Let  us,  point  after  point,  go  over  each 
link  in  the  love-making  and  family  life  of  anthropoid 
apes  and  ascertain  what  in  human  beings  corresponds 
to  each. 

Among  apes  the  courtship  begins  with  a  change  in 
the  female  organism,  determined  by  physiological 
factors  and  automatically  releasing  the  sexual  response 
in  the  male.^  The  male  then  proceeds  to  court  according 
to  the  selective  type  of  wooing  which  prevails  in  a 
given  species.  In  this  all  the  individuals  who  are  within 
the  range  of  influence  take  part,  because  they  are 
irresistibly  attracted  by  the  condition  of  the  female. 

1  In  this  context  I  should  like  to  refer  the  reader  to  Havelock 
ElUs's  Studies  in  the  Psychology  of  Scat  (six  vols.).  In  that  work  the 
biological  nature  of  the  regulation  of  the  sexual  instinct  under 
culture  is  never  lost  sight  of,  and  the  parallel  between  animal  and 
human  societies  is  used  as  an  important  principle  of  explanation. 
For  an  interesting  comment  upon  Darwin's  Theory  of  Sexual  Selec- 
tion, see  vol.  iii,  p.  22  seqq.  (1919  ed.).  In  this  volume  the  reader 
will  also  find  a  general  criticism  of  the  various  theories  of  the  sex 
impulse.  In  volume  iv.  Sexual  Selection  in  man  is  discussed  ; 
volume  vi  deals  with  the  sociological  aspect  of  the  problem. 

193  o 


194  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

Rut  provides  opportunities  for  display  on  the  part  of 
the  males  and  for  selection  on  the  part  of  the  female. 
All  the  factors  which  define  animal  behaviour  at  this 
stage  are  common  to  all  individuals  of  the  species. 
They  work  with  such  uniformity  that  for  each  animal 
species  one  set  of  data  and  only  one  has  to  be  given  by 
the  zoologist,  while,  on  the  other  hand,  they  vary 
considerably  from  one  species  to  another,  so  that  for 
each  species  a  new  description  is  necessary.  But 
within  the  species  the  variations,  whether  individual 
or  otherwise,  are  so  small  and  irrelevant  that  the 
zoologist  ignores  them  and  is  fully  justified  in  doing  so. 

Could  an  anthropologist  provide  such  a  formula 
for  the  mechanism  of  courtship  and  mating  in  the 
human  species  ?  Obviously  not.  It  is  sufficient  to 
open  any  book  referring  to  the  sexual  life  of  humanity, 
whether  it  be  the  classical  works  of  Havelock  Ellis, 
Westermarck,  and  Frazer  or  the  excellent  descriptions 
in  Crawley's  Mystic  Rose,  to  find  that  there  are 
innumerable  forms  of  courtship  and  marriage,  that 
seasons  of  love-making  are  different,  that  types  of 
wooing  and  winning  vary  with  each  culture.  To  the 
zoologist  the  species  is  the  unit,  to  the  anthropologist 
the  unit  is  the  culture.  In  other  words,  the  zoologist 
deals  with  specific  instinctive  behaviour,  the 
anthropologist  with  a  culturally  fashioned  habit- 
response. 

Let  us  examine  this  in  greater  detail.  In  the  first  place 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  195 

we  see  that  in  man  there  is  no  season  of  rut,  which 
means  that  man  is  ready  to  make  love  at  any  time 
and  woman  to  respond  to  him — a  condition  which, 
as  we  all  know,  does  not  simplify  human  intercourse. 
There  is  nothing  in  man  which  acts  with  the  same  sharp 
determination  as  does  the  onset  of  ovulation  in  any 
mammalian  female.  Does  this  mean,  however,  that 
there  is  anything  approaching  indiscriminate  mating 
in  any  human  society  ?  We  know  that  even  in  the 
most  licentious  cultures  nothing  like  '  promiscuity  ' 
exists  or  could  ever  have  existed.  In  every  human 
culture  we  find,  first  of  all,  systems  of  well-defined 
taboos  which  rigidly  separate  a  number  of  people  of 
opposite  sexes  and  exclude  whole  categories  of 
potential  partners.  The  most  important  of  these  taboos 
completely  excludes  from  mating  those  people  who  are 
normally  and  naturally  in  contact,  that  is,  the  members 
of  the  same  family,  parents  from  children,  and  brothers 
from  sisters.  As  an  extension  of  this,  we  find  in  a 
number  of  primitive  societies  a  wider  prohibition  of 
sex  intercourse  which  debars  whole  groups  of  people 
from  any  sex  relations.  This  is  the  law  of  exogamy. 
Next  in  importance  to  the  taboo  of  incest  is  the 
prohibition  of  adultery.  While  the  first  serves  to  guard 
the  family,  the  second  serves  for  the  protection  of 
marriage. 

But  culture  does  not  exercise  a  merely  negative 
influence  upon  the  sexual  impulse.      In  each  com- 


196  SEX    AND  ,  REPRESSION 

munity  we  find  also  inducements  to  courtship  and  to 
amorous  interest  besides  the  prohibitions  and 
exclusions.  The  various  festive  seasons,  times  of 
dancing  and  personal  display,  periods  when  food  is 
lavishly  consumed  and  stimulants  used,  are  as  a  rule 
also  the  signal  for  erotic  pursuits.  At  such  seasons  large 
numbers  of  men  and  women  congregate  and  young 
men  are  brought  in  contact  with  girls  from  beyond  the 
circle  of  the  family  and  of  the  local  group.  Very  often 
some  of  the  usual  restraints  are  lifted  and  boys  and 
girls  are  allowed  to  meet  unhampered  and  uncontrolled. 
Indeed,  such  seasons  naturally  encourage  courtship  by 
means  of  the  stimulants,  the  artistic  pursuits,  and  the 
festive  mood.^ 

Thus  the  signal  for  courtship,  the  release  of 
the  process  of  mating,  is  given  not  by  a  mere  bodily 
change  but  by  a  combination  of  cultural  influences. 
In  the  last  instance  these  influences  obviously  act 
upon  the  human  body  and  stimulate  innate  reactions 
in  that  they  provide  physical  proximity,  mental 
atmosphere,  and  appropriate  suggestions ;  unless  the 
organism  were  ready  to  respond  sexually  no  cultural 
influences  could  make  man  mate.  But,  instead  of  an 
automatic  physiological  mechanism,  we  have  a  com- 
plicated  arrangement   into   which   artificial   elements 

^  Havelock  Ellis  has  given  a  wealth  of  data  on  the  seasonal 
mating  in  animal  and  man  in  the  essay  on  Sexual  Periodicity, 
vol.  i  (1910  ed.),  especially  see  pp.  122  seqq.  Compare  also  Wester- 
marck's  History  of  Human  Marriage,  vol.  i,  ch.  ii. 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  197 

have  been  largely  introduced.  Two  points,  therefore, 
must  be  noted  :  there  is  no  purely  biological  release 
mechanism  in  man,  but  instead  there  is  a  combined 
psychological  and  physiological  process  determined 
in  its  temporal,  spatial,  and  formal  nature  by  cultural 
tradition ;  associated  with  it  and  supplementing  it 
is  a  system  of  cultural  taboos  which  limit  considerably 
the  working  of  the  sexual  impulse. 

Let  us  inquire  now  what  is  the  biological  value  of 
rut  for  an  animal  species  and  what  are  the  consequences 
for  man  of  its  absence.  In  all  animal  species  mating 
has  to  be  selective,  i.e.  there  must  be  opportunities 
for  comparison  and  for  choice  with  either  sex.  Both 
male  and  female  must  have  a  chance  to  display  his  or 
her  charms,  to  exercise  attractions,  to  compete  for  the 
chosen  one.  Colour,  voice,  physical  strength,  cunning 
and  agility  in  combat — each  a  symptom  of  bodily 
vigour  and  organic  perfection — determine  the  choice. 
Mating  by  choice,  again,  is  an  indispensable  counter- 
part of  natural  selection,  for  without  some  arrangement 
for  selective  mating  the  species  would  degenerate. 
This  necessity  increases  as  we  ascend  the  scale  of  organic 
evolution  ;  in  the  lowest  animals  there  is  not  even  the 
need  for  pairing.  It  is  clear,  therefore,  that  in  the 
highest  animal,  man,  the  need  for  selective  mating 
cannot  have  disappeared.  In  fact,  the  opposite 
assumption,  that  it  is  most  stringent,  is  more  likely  to 
be  true. 


igS  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

Rut,  however,  supplies  the  animal  not  only  with  the 
opportunities  for  selection.  It  also  definitely  circum- 
scribes and  delimits  sexual  interest.  Outside  the  rutting 
season  the  sexual  interest  is  in  abeyance  and  the  com- 
petition and  strife  as  well  as  the  overpowering 
absorption  in  sex  are  eliminated  from  the  ordinary 
life  of  an  animal  species.  Considering  the  great  danger 
from  outside  enemies  and  the  disruptive  forces  within, 
which  are  associated  with  courtship,  the  elimination 
of  the  sex  interest  from  normal  times  and  its 
concentration  on  a  definite  short  period  is  of  great 
importance  for  the  survival  of  animal  species. 

In  the  light  of  all  this,  what  does  the  absence  of 
rut  in  man  really  signify  ?  The  sexual  impulse  is  not 
confined  to  any  season,  not  conditioned  by  any  bodily 
process,  and  as  far  as  mere  physiological  forces  are 
concerned,  it  is  there  to  affect  at  any  moment  the  life 
of  man  and  woman.  It  is  ready  to  upset  all  other 
interests  at  all  times  ;  left  to  itself  it  tends  constantly 
to  work  upon  and  loosen  all  existing  bonds.  This 
impulse,  absorbing  and  pervading  as  it  is,  would  thus 
interfere  with  all  normal  occupations  of  man,  would 
destroy  any  budding  form  of  association,  would  create 
chaos  from  within  and  would  invite  dangers  from 
without.  As  we  know,  this  is  not  a  mere  phantasy  ; 
the  sex  impulse  has  been  the  source  of  most  trouble 
from  Adam  and  Eve  onwards.  It  is  the  cause  of  most 
tragedies,    whether   we   meet    them   in   present   day 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  199 

actualities,  in  past  history,  in  myth  or  in  hterary 
production.  And  yet  the  very  fact  of  conflict  shows 
that  there  exist  some  forces  which  control  the  sexual 
impulse  ;  it  proves  that  man  does  not  surrender  to 
his  insatiable  appetites  ;  that  he  creates  barriers  and 
imposes  taboos  which  become  as  powerful  as  the  very 
forces  of  destiny. 

It  is  important  to  note  that  these  barriers  and 
mechanisms  which  regulate  sex  under  culture  are 
different  from  the  animal  safeguards  in  the  state  of 
nature.  With  the  animal  instinctive  endowment  and 
physiological  change  throw  male  and  female  into  a 
situation  out  of  which  they  have  to  extricate  them- 
selves by  the  simple  play  of  natural  impulses.  With 
man  the  control  comes,  as  we  know,  from  culture  and 
tradition.  In  each  society  we  find  rules  which  make  it 
impossible  for  men  and  women  to  yield  freely  to  the 
impulse.  How  these  taboos  arise,  by  what  forces  they 
work,  we  shall  see  presently.  For  the  moment  it  is 
enough  to  realize  clearly  that  a  social  taboo  does  not 
derive  its  force  from  instinct,  but  that  instead  it  always 
has  to  work  against  some  innate  impulse.  In  this  we  see 
plainly  the  difference  between  human  endowment  and 
animal  instinct.  While  man  is  ready  to  respond  sexually 
at  any  moment,  he  also  submits  to  an  artificially 
imposed  check  upon  this  response.  Again,  while  there 
is  no  natural  bodily  process  which  definitely  releases 
active  sexual  interest  between  male  and  female,     a 


200  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

number  of  inducements  towards  courtship  guide  and 
bring  out  the  impulse. 

We  can  now  formulate  more  precisely  what  we  mean 
by  the  plasticity  of  instincts.  The  modes  of  behaviour 
associated  with  sex  interest  are  determined  in  man 
only  as  regards  their  ends ;  man  must  mate  selectively, 
he  cannot  mate  promiscuously.  On  the  other  hand, 
the  release  of  the  impulse,  the  inducement  to  courtship, 
the  motives  for  a  definite  selection  are  dictated  by 
cultural  arrangements.  These  arrangements  have  to 
follow  certain  lines  parallel  to  the  hnes  of  natural 
endowment  in  the  animal.  There  must  be  an  element 
of  selection,  there  must  be  safeguards  for  exclusive- 
ness,  above  all  therfe  must  be  taboos  which  prevent 
sex  from  constantly  interfering  in  ordinary  life. 

The  plasticity  of  instincts  in  man  is  defined  by  the 
absence  of  physiological  changes,  of  automatic  release 
of  a  biologically  determined  cause  of  courtship.  It  is 
associated  with  the  effective  determination  of  sexual 
behaviour  by  cultural  elements.  Man  is  endowed  with 
sexual  tendencies  but  these  have  to  be  moulded  in 
addition  by  systems  of  cultural  rules  which  vary  from 
one  society  to  another.  We  shall  be  able  to  see  with 
greater  precision  in  the  course  of  our  present  inquiry 
how  far  these  norms  can  differ  from  each  other  and 
diverge  from  the  fundamental  animal  pattern. 


IV 

MARITAL   RELATIONS 

T  ET  us  follow  the  universal  romance  of  life  and  look 
into  its  next  stage.  And  let  us  examine  the  bonds 
of  marriage  into  which  lead  the  two  parallel  paths  of 
man  and  animal,  of  eolithic  cave-dweller  and  of  super- 
simian  ape.  Of  what  does  marriage  really  consist  in 
animals,  especially  in  apes  ?  Mating  occurs  as  the 
culminating  act  of  courtship  and  with  this  the  female 
conceives.  With  impregnation  the  rut  is  over  and  with 
its  end  there  ceases  the  sexual  attractiveness  of  the 
female  to  other  males.  But  this  is  not  the  case  with  the 
male  who  has  won  her,  whom  she  has  chosen  and  to 
whom  she  has  surrendered.  It  is  difficult  to  affirm 
from  the  data  at  our  disposal  whether  in  the  state  of 
nature  the  higher  apes  still  continue  to  mate  sexually 
after  impregnation.  The  fact,  however,  that  the  female 
ceases  to  be  attractive  to  other  males  while  her  mate 
remains  attached  to  her  constitutes  the  bond  of 
animal  marriage.  The  specific  response  of  both  male 
and  female  to  the  new  situation  ;  their  mutual  attach- 
ment ;  the  tendency  of  the  male  to  remain  with  his 
consort,  to  guard  her,  to  assist  her,  and  to  protect  and 
nourish  her — these  are  the  innate  elements  of  which 
animal  marriage  is  made  up.     The  new  phase  of  life 

201 


202  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

therefore  consists  of  a  new  type  of  behaviour  ;  it  is 
dominated  by  a  new  hnk  in  the  chain  of  instincts. 
This  new  link  might  appropriately  be  called  the 
matrimonial  response  in  contrast  to  the  sexual  impulse. 
The  animal  union  is  based  neither  upon  the  un- 
controllable passion  of  rut  nor  on  the  sexual  jealousy 
of  the  male  nor  on  any  claims  of  general  appropriation 
on  the  part  of  the  male.  It  is  based  on  a  special  innate 
tendency. 

When  we  pass  to  human  society  the  nature  of 
matrimonial  bonds  is  found  to  be  entirely  different. 
The  act  of  sexual  union,  in  the  first  place,  does  not 
constitute  marriage.  A  special  form  of  ceremonial 
sanction  is  necessary  and  this  type  of  social  act  differs 
from  the  taboos  and  inducements  of  which  we  spoke 
in  the  previous  chapter.  We  have  here  a  special  creative 
act  of  culture,  a  sanction  or  hallmark  which  establishes 
a  new  relation  between  two  individuals.  This  relation- 
ship possesses  a  force  derived  not  from  instincts  but 
from  sociological  pressure.  The  new  tie  is  something 
over  and  above  the  biological  bond.  As  long  as  this 
creative  act  has  not  been  performed,  as  long  as  marriage 
has  not  been  concluded  in  its  cultural  forms,  a  man  and 
a  woman  can  mate  and  cohabit  as  long  and  as  often  as 
they  like,  and  their  relation  remains  something 
essentially  different  from  a  socially  sanctioned  marriage. 
Their  tie,  since  there  is  no  innate  matrimonial  arrange- 
ment in  man,  is  not  biologically  safeguarded.    Nor  is 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  203 

it,  since  society  has  not  established  it,  enforced  by 
cultural  sanction.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  in  every  human 
society  a  man  and  a  woman  who  attempt  to  behave  as 
if  they  were  married  without  obtaining  the  appropriate 
social  sanction  are  made  to  suffer  more  or  less  severe 
penalties. 

A  new  force,  therefore,  a  new  element,  comes  into 
play  supplementing  the  mere  instinctive  regulation  of 
animals  :  the  actual  interference  of  society.  And  it 
need  hardly  be  added  that  once  this  sanction  has  been 
obtained,  once  two  people  have  been  married,  they 
not  only  may  but  must  fulfill  the  numerous  obligations, 
physiological,  economic,  religious,  and  domestic  which 
are  involved  in  this  human  relationship.  As  we  have 
seen,  the  conclusion  of  a  human  marriage  is  not  the 
consequence  of  a  mere  instinctive  drive  but  of  complex 
cultural  inducements.  But  after  matrimony  has  been 
sociologically  sealed  and  hall-marked,  a  number  of 
duties,  ties,  and  reciprocities  are  imposed,  backed  up 
by  legal,  religious,  and  moral  sanctions.  In  human 
societies  such  a  relationship  can  usually  be  dissolved 
and  re-entered  with  another  partner  but  this  process 
is  never  easy  to  carry  out,  and  in  some  cultures  the 
price  of  divorce  makes  it  almost  prohibitive. 

Here  we  see  clearly  the  difference  between  instinctive 
regulation  on  the  one  hand  and  cultural  determinism 
on  the  other.  While  in  animals  marriage  is  induced 
by  selective  courtship,  concluded  by  the  mere  act  of 


204  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

impregnation,  and  maintained  by  the  forces  of  the 
innate  matrimonial  attachment,  in  man  it  is  induced 
by  cultural  elements,  concluded  by  sociological 
sanction  and  maintained  by  the  various  systems  of 
social  pressure.  And  yet  here  again  it  is  not  difficult 
to  perceive  that  the  cultural  apparatus  works  very 
much  in  the  same  direction  as  natural  instincts  and 
that  it  attains  the  same  ends  though  the  mechanism 
entirely  differs.  In  the  higher  animals  marriage 
is  necessary  because  the  longer  the  pregnancy, 
the  more  helpless  the  pregnant  female  and  the 
new-born  infant  and  the  more  necessary  it  is 
for  them  to  have  the  protection  of  the  male.  The 
innately  determined  bond  of  matrimonial  affection 
by  which  the  male  responds  to  the  pregnancy  of  his 
chosen  mate  fulfills  this  need  of  the  species,  and  is, 
in  fact,  indispensable  for  its  continuity. 

In  man  this  need  for  an  affectionate  and  interested 
protector  of  pregnancy  still  remains.  That  the  innate 
mechanism  has  disappeared  we  know  from  the  fact 
that  in  most  societies  on  a  low  as  well  as  on  a  high 
level  of  culture  the  male  refuses  to  take  any 
responsibility  for  his  offspring  unless  compelled  to  do 
so  by  society,  which  enforces  the  contract  of  marriage. 
But  each  culture  develops  certain  forces  and  there 
exist  certain  arrangements  which  play  the  same  part 
as  the  instinctive  drives  do  in  an  animal  species.  The 
institution    of    marriage    in    its    fundamental    moral. 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  205 

legal  and  religious  aspects  must  thus  be  regarded  not 
as  the  direct  outgrowth  of  the  matrimonial  tendency 
in  animals  but  as  its  cultural  substitute.  This 
institution  imposes  upon  man  and  woman  a  type  of 
behaviour  which  corresponds  as  closely  to  the  needs  of 
the  human  species  as  the  innate  tendencies  in  animals 
correspond  to  theirs. 

As  we  shall  see,  the  most  powerful  means  by  which 
culture  binds  husband  and  wife  to  each  other  consists 
in  the  moulding  and  organizing  of  their  emotions  and 
in  the  shaping  of  their  personal  attitudes.  This  process 
we  shall  have  opportunity  to  study  more  fully,  and  in 
it  we  shall  find  the  essential  differences  between  animal 
and  human  bonds.  While  in  animals  we  find  a  chain 
of  linked  instincts  succeeding  each  other  and  replacing 
each  other,  human  behaviour  is  defined  by  a  fuUy 
organized  emotional  attitude,  a  sentiment,  as  it  is 
technically  called  in  psychology.  While  in  the  animal 
we  have  a  series  of  physiological  moments,  events 
happening  within  the  organism,  each  of  which 
determines  an  innate  response,  in  man  we  have  a 
continuously  developing  system  of  emotions.  From  the 
first  meeting  of  the  two  prospective  lovers,  through 
gradual  infatuation  and  the  growth  of  associated 
interests  and  affections,  we  can  follow  a  developing 
and  increasingly  richer  system  of  emotions  in  which 
continuity  and  consistency  are  the  condition  of  a  happy 
and    harmonious    relationship.       Into    this    complex 


206  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

attitude  there  enter,  besides  innate  responses,  social 
elements,  such  as  moral  rules,  economic  expecta- 
tions and  spiritual  interests.  The  latter  stages  of 
matrimonial  affection  are  powerfully  determined  by 
the  course  of  courtship.  On  the  other  hand,  courtship 
and  the  personal  interest  of  two  prospective  lovers  is 
coloured  by  the  possibilities  of  future  matrimony  and 
by  its  advantages.  In  the  anticipatory  elements,  in 
which  the  future  responses  are  brought  to  bear  upon 
present  arrangements  ;  in  the  influence  of  memories 
and  experiences  ;  in  the  constant  adjustment  of  past, 
present,  and  future,  we  see  why  human  relationship 
presents  a  continuous  and  homogeneous  growth  instead 
of  the  series  of  clearly  differentiated  stages  which  we 
find  in  the  animal. 

In  all  this,  again,  we  meet  the  same  plasticity  of 
instincts  already  noticed  in  the  earlier  stages,  and  we 
see  that  though  the  mechanisms  under  culture  differ 
considerably  from  physiological  arrangements,  the 
general  forms  into  which  society  moulds  human 
matrimonial  rules  follow  clearly  the  lines  dictated  by 
natural  selection  to  animal  species. 


V 

PARENTAL    LOVE 

/COURTSHIP,  mating,  and  pregnancy  lead  in  animal 
and  man  to  the  same  end  :  the  birth  of  the  off- 
spring. To  this  event  there  is  also  a  similar  mental  re- 
sponse in  pre-human  species  as  well  as  in  woman  and 
man  under  culture.  In  fact  at  first  sight  the  act  of 
birth  might  be  quoted  as  the  one  organic  event  in  which 
man  does  not  differ  at  all  from  the  animal.  Maternity, 
indeed,  is  usually  regarded  as  the  one  relationship  which 
is  bodily  carried  over  from  the  simian  to  the  human 
status  ;  which  is  defined  biologically  and  not  culturally. 
This  view,  however,  is  not  correct.  Human  maternity 
is  a  relationship  determined  to  a  considerable  degree 
by  cultural  factors.  Human  paternity,  on  the  other 
hand,  which  appears  at  first  as  almost  completely 
lacking  in  biological  foundation,  can  be  shown  to  be 
deeply  rooted  in  natural  endowment  and  organic 
need.  Thus  here  again  we  are  forced  to  compare 
minutely  the  animal  with  the  human  family,  to  state 
the  similarities  as  well  as  the  differences. 

With  the  animal,  birth  changes  the  relationship 
between  the  two  mates.  A  new  member  has  arrived 
into  the  family.  The  mother  responds  to  it  immediately. 

207 


2o8  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

She  licks  the  offspring,  watches  it  constantly,  warms 
it  with  her  body,  and  feeds  it  with  her  breasts.  The 
early  maternal  cares  imply  certain  anatomical  arrange- 
ments such  as  the  pouches  in  the  marsupials  and  the 
milk-glands  in  the  mammals.  There  comes  a  response 
in  the  mother  to  the  appearance  of  the  offspring. 
There  is  also  a  response  in  the  young — it  is,  in  fact, 
perhaps  the  most  unquestionable  type  of  instinctive 
activity. 

The  human  mother  is  endowed  with  similar 
anatomical  equipment  and,  in  her  body,  conception, 
pregnancy,  and  childbirth  entail  a  series  of  changes 
analogous  to  the  gestation  of  any  other  mammal. 
When  the  child  is  born  the  bodily  status  which  con- 
stitutes animal  motherhood  is  to  be  found  also  in  the 
human  mother.  Her  breasts  swollen  with  milk  invite 
the  child  to  suck  with  an  impulse  as  elementary 
and  powerful  as  the  infant's  hunger  and  thirst.  The 
needs  of  the  child  for  a  warm,  comfortable,  and  safe 
place  dovetail  into  the  extremely  strong,  passionate 
desire  of  the  mother  to  clasp  the  infant.  They  are 
correlated  to  her  tenderness  and  solicitude  for  the 
child's  welfare. 

Yet  in  no  human  society,  however  high  or  low  it 
might  be  in  culture,  is  maternity  simply  a  matter  of 
biological  endowment  or  of  innate  impulses.  Cultural 
influences  analogous  to  those  we  found  determining 
relations    between   lovers    and    imposing    obligations 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  209 

between  consorts,  are  at  work  even  in  moulding  the 
relation  of  the  mother  to  the  child.  From  the  moment 
of  conception  this  relation  becomes  a  concern  of  the 
community.  The  mother  has  to  observe  taboos,  she 
follows  certain  customs  and  submits  to  ritual  pro- 
ceedings. In  higher  societies  these  are  largely  but  not 
completely  replaced  by  hygienic  and  moral  rules ; 
in  lower  they  belong  to  the  domain  of  magic  and 
religion.  But  all  such  customs  and  precepts  aim  at 
the  welfare  of  the  unborn  child.  For  its  sake  the  mother 
has  to  undergo  ceremonial  treatment,  suffer  privations 
and  discomforts.  Thus  an  obligation  is  imposed  upon 
the  prospective  mother  in  anticipation  of  her  future 
instinctive  response.  Her  duties  run  ahead  of  her 
feelings,  culture  dictates  and  prepares  her  future 
attitude. 

After  birth  the  scheme  of  traditional  relations  is  not 
less  powerful  and  active.  Ceremonies  of  purification, 
rules  which  isolate  the  mother  and  child  from  the  rest 
of  the  community,  baptismal  rites  and  rites  of  the 
reception  of  the  newborn  infant  into  the  tribe,  create 
one  and  all  a  special  bond  between  the  two.  Such 
customs  exist  both  in  patrilineal  and  matrUineal 
societies.  In  these  latter  there  are,  as  a  rule,  even  more 
elaborate  arrangements  and  the  mother  is  brought  into 
yet  closer  contact  with  the  child,  not  onl}^  at  the  outset 
but  also  at  a  later  period. 

Thus  it  can  be  said  without  exaggeration  that  culture 


210  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

in  its  traditional  bidding  duplicates  the  instinctive  drive. 
More  precisely  it  anticipates  its  rulings.  At  the  same 
time,  all  cultural  influences  simply  endorse,  amplify, 
and  specialize  the  natural  tendencies,  those  which  bid 
the  mother  tenderly  to  suckle,  to  protect,  and  to  care 
for  her  offspring. 

If  we  try  to  draw  the  parallel  between  the  relation 
of  father  to  child  in  animal  and  human  societies,  we 
find  that  it  is  easy  to  discover  the  cultural  elements 
in  humanity  but  difficult  to  find  out  what  instinctive 
endowment  could  exist.  As  a  matter  of  fact,  in  higher 
cultures  at  least  the  necessity  for  imposing  the  bond  of 
marriage  is  practically  and  theoretically  due  to  the  fact 
that  a  father  has  to  be  made  to  look  after  his  children. 
An  illegitimate  child  has,  as  a  rule,  no  chance  of 
receiving  the  same  care  from  its  natural  father  as  a 
legitimate  one  and  the  latter  is  cared  for  to  a  large 
extent  because  it  is  the  father's  duty.  Does  that  mean 
that  there  are  no  innate  paternal  tendencies  in  man  ? 
It  will  be  possible  for  us  to  show  that  the  human 
father  is,  on  the  contrary,  endowed  with  definite 
impulses — not  sufficient  to  establish  natural  paternity, 
but  powerful  enough  to  serve  as  the  raw  material  out 
of  which  custom  is  fashioned. 

Let  us  first  look  at  paternity  among  the  higher 
mammals.  We  know  that  the  male  is  indispensable 
there,  because,  owing  to  long  pregnancy,  lactation, 
and  education  of  the  young,  the  female  and  her  offspring 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  211 

need  a  strong  and  interested  protector.  Correlated 
with  this  need  we  find  what  has  been  called  in  the 
previous  chapter  the  matrimonial  response.  This 
response,  which  induces  the  male  to  look  after  the 
pregnant  female,  is  not  weakened  by  the  act  of  birth, 
but,  on  the  contrary,  it  becomes  stronger  and  develops 
into  a  tendency  on  the  part  of  the  male  to  protect  the 
whole  family.  The  matrimonial  attachment  between 
the  two  partners  has  to  be  regarded  biologically  as  an 
intermediate  stage  leading  up  to  paternal  attachment. 

Turning  now  to  human  societies,  we  see  that  the 
need,  far  from  abating,  becomes  even  stronger.  The 
pregnant  and  lactant  woman  is  not  less  but  more 
helpless  than  her  simian  sister,  and  this  helplessness 
increases  with  culture.  The  children  again  need  not 
only  the  ordinary  cares  of  animal  infancy,  not  merely 
suckling  and  tending,  as  well  as  the  education  of 
certain  innate  tendencies,  but  also  such  instruction  in 
language,  tradition,  and  handicraft  as  is  indispensable 
even  in  the  simplest  human  societies. 

Can  we  therefore  imagine  that  as  humanity  was 
passing  from  a  state  of  nature  into  culture  the 
fundamental  tendency  in  the  male,  which  under  the 
new  conditions  was  even  more  imperative,  should 
be  gradually  lessened  or  be  led  to  disappear  ?  Such  a 
state  of  affairs  would  run  counter  to  all  biological 
laws.  It  is,  in  fact,  completely  denied  by  all  the  facts 
observed  in  human  societies.   For,  once  a  man  is  made 


212  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

to  remain  with  his  wife  to  guard  her  pregnancy,  to 
observe  the  various  duties  which  he  usually  has  to 
fulfill  at  birth,  there  can  be  not  the  slightest  doubt  that 
his  response  to  the  offspring  is  that  of  impulsive  interest 
and  tender  attachment. 

Thus  we  see  an  interesting  difference  between  the 
working  of  cultural  and  natural  endowment.  Culture — 
in  the  form  of  law,  morals,  and  custom — forces  the  male 
into  the  position  in  which  he  has  to  submit  to  the 
natural  situation,  that  is,  he  has  to  keep  guard  over 
the  pregnant  woman.  It  forces  him  also,  through 
various  means,  to  share  in  her  anticipatory  interest  in 
the  child.  But  once  forced  into  this  position,  the  male 
responds  invariably  with  strong  interests  and  positive 
feelings  for  the  offspring. 

And  this  brings  us  to  a  very  interesting  point.  In 
all  human  societies — ^however  they  might  differ  in  the 
patterns  of  sexual  morality,  in  the  knowledge  of 
embryology,  and  in  their  types  of  courtship — there  is 
universally  found  what  might  be  called  the  rule  of 
legitimacy.  By  this  I  mean  that  in  all  human  societies 
a  girl  is  bidden  to  be  married  before  she  becomes 
pregnant.  Pregnancy  and  childbirth  on  the  part  of  an 
unmarried  young  woman  are  invariably  regarded  as 
a  disgrace.^     Such  is  the  case  in  the  very  free  com- 

^  Wester marck  in  the  History  of  Human  Marriage,  1921,  vol.  i, 
pp.  138-157,  cites  approximately  100  cases  of  primitive  peoples 
who  are  characterized  by  their  pre-nuptial  chastity.     But  many  of 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  213 

munities  of  Melanesia  described  in  this  essay.  Such  is 
the  case  in  all  human  societies  concerning  which  we 
have  any  information.  I  know  of  no  single  instance  in 
anthropological  Hterature  of  a  community  where 
illegitimate  children,  that  is  children  of  unmarried 
girls,  would  enjoy  the  same  social  treatment  and  have 
the  same  social  status  as  legitimate  ones. 

The  universal  postulate  of  legitimacy  has  a  great 
sociological  significance,  which  is  not  yet  sufficiently 
acknowledged.  It  means  that  in  all  human  societies 
moral  tradition  and  law  decree  that  the  group  con- 
sisting of  a  woman  and  her  offspring  is  not  a 
sociologically  complete  unit.  The  ruUng  of  culture 
runs  here  again  on  entirely  the  same  lines  as  natural 
endowment ;  it  declares  that  the  human  family  must 
consist  of  the  male  as  well  as  the  female. 

And  in  this  culture  finds  a  ready  response  in  the 

the  statements  quoted  do  not  afford  very  definite  evidence  of  this 
fact.  Thus  to  say  of  certain  tribes  that  "  chastity  is  prized  in  man 
or  woman  "  or  that  "  a  good  deal  of  value  is  laid  upon  the  virginity 
of  the  bride  "  is  not  to  give  proof  of  lack  of  pre-marital  intercourse. 
What,  however,  is  of  extreme  importance  in  this  computation  of 
evidence  from  our  point  of  view  is  that  the  only  thing  it  definitely 
indicates  is  the  universality  of  the  postulate  of  legitimacy.  Thus 
twenty-five  of  the  cases  quoted  refer,  not  to  chastity,  but  to  the 
prohibition  of  an  unmarried  girl  being  with  child.  Further,  more 
than  a  score  of  others  indicate,  not  the  absence  of  illicit  sexual 
relations,  but  that  when  they  occur,  censure,  or  punishment,  or 
a  fine,  or  compulsion  of  the  two  parties  to  marry,  according  to  the 
tribe,  follows  discovery.  In  fact  though  the  total  evidence  is  not 
conclusive  as  regards  chastity  it  does  prove  that  the  postulate 
of  legitimacy  is  of  extremely  wide  prevalence.  The  two  problems 
should  be  kept  distinct,  from  the  point  of  view  of  our  argument. 


214  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

emotional  attitudes  of  the  male.  The  father  at  all 
stages  of  culture  is  interested  in  his  children,  and  this 
interest,  no  matter  how  it  might  be  rationalized  in 
certain  patrilineal  societies,  is  exactly  the  same  in 
matrilineal  societies  where  the  child  is  neither  an  heir 
nor  successor  to  his  father  nor  even  usually  regarded 
as  the  offspring  of  his  body.^  And  even  when,  as  in  a 
polyandrous  society,  there  is  no  possibility  at  all  for 
any  knowledge  and  interest  in  the  matter  of  who  might 
be  the  begetter,  the  one  who  is  selected  to  act  as  the 
father  responds  emotionally  to  this  call. 

It  would  be  interesting  to  inquire  in  what  way  we 
could  imagine  the  working  of  the  instinctive  tendency 
of  fatherhood.  With  the  mother  the  response  is  plainly 
determined  by  the  bodily  facts.  It  is  the  child  whom 
she  has  created  in  her  womb  that  she  is  going  to  love 
and  be  interested  in.  With  the  man  there  can  be  no 
such  correlation  between  the  seminal  cell  which 
fertilizes  the  female  ovum  on  the  one  hand  and  the 
sentimental  attitude  on  the  other.  It  seems  to  me  that 
the  only  factors  which  determine  the  sentimental 
attitude  in  the  male  parent  are  connected  with  the 
life  led  together  with  the  mother  during  her  pregnancy. 
If  this  is  correct,  we  see  how  the  dictates  of  culture  are 
necessary  in  order  to  stimulate  and  organize  emotional 
attitudes  in  man  and  how  innate  endowment  is  indis- 


^  Compare   the   writer's    The   Father    in    Primitive    Psychology, 
"Psyche  Miniatures,"  1927. 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  215 

pensable  to  culture.  Social  forces  alone  could  not 
impose  so  many  duties  on  the  male,  nor  without  a 
strong  biological  endowment  could  he  carry  them  out 
with  such  spontaneous  emotional  response. 

The  cultural  elements  which  enter  into  the  father- 
to-child  relationship  are  closely  parallel  to  those  which 
determine  maternity.  The  father  usually  has  a  share 
in  the  mother's  taboos,  or,  at  least,  he  has  to  maintain 
some  others  side  by  side  with  her,  A  special  type  of 
prohibition  which  is  definitely  associated  with  the 
welfare  of  the  child  is  the  taboo  on  sexual  intercourse 
with  a  pregnant  wife.  At  birth  there  are  again  duties 
for  the  father  to  perform.  The  most  famous  of  these  is 
the  couvade,  a  custom  in  which  the  husband  has  to 
take  over  the  symptoms  of  post-natal  illness  and 
disability  while  the  wife  goes  about  the  ordinary 
business  of  life.  But  though  this  is  the  most  extreme 
form  of  affirmation  of  paternity,  some  analogous 
arrangement,  by  which  the  man  shares  in  certain 
post-natal  burdens  of  his  wife,  or,  at  least,  has  to  carry 
on  actions  in  sympathy  with  her,  exist  in  all  societies. 
It  is  not  difficult  to  place  this  type  of  custom  in  our 
scheme.  Even  the  apparently  absurd  idea  of  the 
couvade  presents  to  us  a  deep  meaning  and  a  necessary 
function.  If  it  is  of  high  biological  value  for  the  human 
family  to  consist  of  both  father  and  mother ;  if 
traditional  customs  and  rules  are  there  to  establish 
a  social  situation  of  close  moral  proximity  between 


2i6  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

father  and  child  ;  if  all  such  customs  aim  at  drawing 
the  man's  attention  to  his  offspring,  then  the  couvade 
which  makes  man  simulate  the  birth-pangs  and  the 
illness  of  maternity  is  of  great  value  and  provides  the 
necessary  stimulus  and  expression  for  paternal 
tendencies.  The  couvade  and  all  the  customs  of  its 
type  serve  to  accentuate  the  principle  of  legitimacy, 
the  child's  need  of  a  father. 

In  all  this  we  have  again  the  two  sides  of  the  question. 
Instincts  alone  never  determine  human  behaviour. 
Rigid  instincts  which  would  prevent  man's  adaptation 
to  any  new  set  of  conditions  are  useless  to  the  human 
species.  The  plasticity  of  instinctive  tendencies  is  the 
condition  of  cultural  advance.  But  the  tendencies  are 
there  and  cannot  be  developed  arbitrarily.  Although 
the  character  of  the  maternal  relation  is  determined 
by  culture  ;  although  the  obligations  are  imposed  from 
outside  by  tradition,  they  all  correspond  to  the  natural 
tendency,  for  they  all  emphasize  the  closeness  of  the 
bond  between  father  and  child,  they  isolate  them  and 
mdke  them  dependent  upon  each  other.  It  is  important 
to  note  that  many  of  these  social  relations  are 
anticipatory  :  they  prepare  the  father  for  his  future 
feelings,  they  dictate  to  him  beforehand  certain 
responses,  which  he  will  later  develop. 

Paternity  we  have  seen  cannot  be  regarded  as  a 
merely  social  arrangement.  Social  elements  simply 
place  man  into  a  situation  in  which  he  can  respond 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  217 

emotionally,  and  they  dictate  to  him  a  series  of  actions 
by  which  the  paternal  tendencies  can  find  their 
expression.  Thus,  while  we  find  that  maternity  is 
social  as  well  as  biological,  we  must  affirm  that 
paternity  is  determined  also  by  biological  elements, 
that  therefore  in  its  make-up  it  is  closely  analogous  to 
the  maternal  bond.  In  all  this  culture  emphasizes 
rather  than  overrides  the  natural  tendencies.  It 
re-makes,  with  other  elements,  the  family  into  the 
same  pattern  as  we  find  in  nature.  Culture  refuses 
to  run  riot. 


VI 

THE  PERSISTENCE  OF  FAMILY  TIES  IN  MAN 

nnHE  family  life  of  mammals  always  lasts  beyond  the 
birth  of  the  offspring  and  the  higher  the  species 
the  longer  both  parents  have  to  look  after  their  progeny. 
The  gradual  ripening  of  the  child  needs  more  protracted 
care  and  training  on  the  part  of  both  father  and  mother, 
and  these  have  to  remain  united  to  look  after  the  little 
ones.  But  in  no  animal  species  does  the  family  last  for 
life.  As  soon  as  the  children  are  independent  they  leave 
the  parents.  This  is  in  keeping  with  the  essential 
needs  of  the  species,  for  any  association,  with  its 
corresponding  ties  becomes  a  burden  to  animals 
unless  it  has  some  specific  function  to  fulfill. 

With  man,  however,  new  elements  enter.  Apart 
from  the  tender  cares  dictated  by  nature  and  endorsed 
by  custom  and  tradition,  there  enters  the  element  of 
cultural  education.  Not  only  is  there  a  need  of  training 
instincts  into  full  development,  as  in  the  animal 
instruction  in  food-gathering  and  specific  movements, 
there  is  also  the  necessity  of  developing  a  number  of 
cultural  habits  as  indispensable  to  man  as  instincts  are 
to  animals.  Man  has  to  teach  his  children  manual 
skill  and  knowledge  in  arts  and  crafts  ;   language  and 

218 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  219 

the  traditions  of  moral  culture  ;  the  manners  and 
customs  which  make  up  social  organization. 

In  all  this  there  is  the  need  of  special  co-operation 
between  the  two  generations,  the  older  which  hands  on 
and  the  younger  which  takes  over  tradition.  And  here 
we  see  the  family  again  as  the  very  workshop  of  cultural 
development,  for  continuity  of  tradition,  especially 
at  the  lowest  levels  of  development,  is  the  most  vital 
condition  of  human  culture  and  this  continuity  depends 
upon  the  organization  of  the  family.  It  is  important 
to  insist  that  with  the  human  family  this  function,  the 
maintenance  of  the  continuity  of  tradition,  is  as 
important  as  the  propagation  of  the  race.  For  man 
could  no  more  survive  if  he  were  deprived  of  culture 
than  culture  could  survive  without  the  human  race  to 
carry  it  on.  Newer  psychology  teaches  us,  moreover, 
that  the  earliest  steps  of  human  training,  those  which 
happen  within  the  family,  are  of  an  educational 
importance  which  has  been  completely  overlooked  by 
earlier  students.  But  if  the  influence  of  the  family  is 
enormous  at  present,  it  must  have  been  even  greater 
at  the  beginnings  of  culture,  where  this  institution  was 
the  only  school  of  man  and  the  education  received  was 
simple  but  had  to  be  given  with  a  vigour  of  outline 
and  a  strength  of  imperative  not  necessary  at  higher 
levels. 

In  this  process  of  parental  education  by  which  the 
continuity  of  culture  is  maintained  we  see  the  most 


220  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

important  form  of  division  of  functions  in  human 
society  :  that  between  giving  the  lead  and  taking  it, 
between  cultural  superiority  and  inferiority.  Teaching 
— the  process  of  imparting  technical  information  and 
moral  values — requires  a  special  form  of  co-operation. 
Not  only  must  the  parent  have  an  interest  in  instructing 
the  child,  and  the  child  an  interest  in  being  taught, 
but  a  special  emotional  setting  is  also  necessary.  There 
must  be  reverence,  submission,  and  confidence  on  the 
one  hand,  tenderness,  feeling  of  authority,  and  desire 
to  guide  on  the  other.  Training  cannot  be  done  without 
some  authority  and  prestige.  The  truths  revealed, 
the  examples  given,  the  orders  imposed  will  not  reach 
their  aim  or  command  obedience  unless  they  are  backed 
up  by  those  specific  attitudes  of  tender  subordination 
and  loving  authority  which  are  characteristic  of  all 
sound  parental  relations  to  the  child.  These  correlated 
attitudes  are  most  difficult  and  most  important  in  the 
relation  between  the  son  and  the  father.  Owing  to  the 
vigour  and  initiative  of  the  young  and  the  conservative 
authority  of  the  old  male,  there  is  a  certain  difficulty 
in  the  establishment  of  a  permanent  reverent  attitude. 
The  mother,  as  the  nearest  guardian  and  the  most 
affectionate  helpmate,  usually  finds  no  difficulties  in 
the  earlier  stages  of  relation  to  children.  In  the 
relation  between  son  and  mother,  however,  which,  if  it 
is  to  continue  harmonious,  should  remain  one  of 
submission,  reverence,  and  subordination,  there  enter 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  221 

other  disturbing  elements  at  a  later  stage  of  life.  To 
these,  already  known  from  the  previous  parts  of  this 
book,  we  shall  presently  have  once  more  to  return. 

The  mature  animal  departs  naturally  from  its 
parents.  In  man  the  need  for  more  enduring  bonds  is 
indisputable.  The  education  of  the  children,  first  of 
all,  binds  them  to  the  family  for  a  long  period  beyond 
their  maturity.  But  even  the  end  of  cultural  education 
is  not  the  final  signal  for  dissolution.  The  contacts 
established  for  cultural  training  last  longer,  and 
they  serve  for  the  establishment  of  further  social 
organization. 

Even  after  a  grown-up  individual  has  left  his  parents 
and  established  a  new  household  his  relation  to  them 
remains  active.  In  all  primitive  societies,  without 
exception,  the  local  community,  the  clan  or  the  tribe, 
is  organized  by  a  gradual  extension  of  family  ties.  The 
social  nature  of  secret  societies,  totemic  units  and 
tribal  groups  is  invariably  based  on  courtship  ideas, 
associated  with  local  habitation  by  the  principle  of 
authority  and  rank,  but  with  all  this  it  is  still  definitely 
linked  with  the  original  family  bond.^ 

It  is  in  this  actual  and  empirical  relationship  between 
all  wider  social  groupings  on  the  one  hand  and  the 
family  on   the   other   that   we  have  to   register  the 

1  I  cannot  document  this  point  of  view  more  extensively  here.  It 
will  be  developed  in  a  work  on  The  Psychology  of  Kinship,  in 
preparation  for  the  International  Library  of  Psychology. 


222  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

fundamental  importance  of  the  latter.  In  primitive 
societies  the  individual  does  build  up  all  his  social 
ties  upon  the  pattern  of  his  relation  to  father  and 
mother,  to  brother  and  sister.  In  this,  again,  anthro- 
pologists, psycho-analysts  and  psychologists  are  fuUy 
in  agreement,  putting  on  one  side  the  fantastic  theories 
of  Morgan  and  some  of  his  followers.  Thus  the 
endurance  of  family  ties  beyond  maturity  is  the 
pattern  of  all  social  organization,  and  the  condition 
of  co-operation  in  all  economic,  religious,  and  magical 
matters.  This  conclusion  we  reached  in  a  previous 
chapter,  where  we  examined  the  alleged  gregarious 
instinct  and  found  that  there  is  neither  an  instinct 
nor  a  tendency  towards  "  herding  ".  But  if  social 
bonds  cannot  be  reduced  to  pre-human  gregariousness, 
they  must  have  been  derived  from  the  development  of 
the  only  relationship  which  man  has  taken  over  from 
his  animal  ancestors :  the  relationship  between  husband 
and  wife,  between  parents  and  children,  between 
brothers  and  sisters,  in  short  the  relationship  of  the 
undivided  family. 

This  being  so,  we  see  that  the  endurance  of  family 
bonds  and  the  corresponding  biological  and  cultural 
attitude  is  indispensable  not  only  for  the  sake  of 
the  continuity  of  tradition  but  also  for  the  sake 
of  cultural  co-operation.  And  in  this  fact  we 
have  to  register  what  is  perhaps  the  deepest 
change     in    the    instinctive    endowment    of    animal 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  223 

and  man,  for  in  human  society  the  extension  of 
family  bonds  beyond  maturity  does  not  follow  the 
instinctive  pattern  to  be  found  among  animals.  We 
can  no  longer  speak  of  plastic  innate  tendencies,  for, 
since  the  family  bonds  extended  beyond  maturity  do 
not  exist  in  animals,  they  cannot  be  innate.  Moreover 
the  utility  and  function  of  life-long  family  bonds  are 
conditioned  by  culture  and  not  by  biological  needs. 
Parallel  to  this,  we  see  that  in  animals  there  is  no 
tendency  to  maintain  the  family  beyond  the  stage 
of  biological  serviceability.  In  man,  culture  creates 
a  new  need,  the  need  to  continue  close  relations  between 
parents  and  children  for  the  whole  life.  On  the  one 
hand  this  need  is  conditioned  by  the  transmission  of 
culture  from  one  generation  to  another  ;  on  the  other 
by  the  need  of  life-long  endurance  of  bonds  which 
form  the  pattern  and  starting-point  for  all  social 
organization.  The  family  is  the  biological  grouping  to 
which  all  kinship  is  invariably  referred  and  which 
determines  by  rules  of  descent  and  inheritance  the  social 
status  of  the  offspring.  As  can  be  seen,  this  relation 
never  becomes  irrelevant  to  a  man  and  has  constantly 
to  be  kept  alive.  Culture,  then,  creates  a  new  type  of 
human  bond  for  which  there  is  no  prototype  in  the 
animal  kingdom.  And  as  we  shall  see,  in  this  very 
creative  act,  where  culture  steps  beyond  instinctive 
endowment  and  natural  precedent,  it  also  creates 
serious  dangers  for  man.    Two  powerful  temptations. 


224  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

the  temptation  of  sex  and  that  of  rebeUion,  arise  at 
the  very  moment  of  cultural  emancipation  from  nature. 
Within  the  group  which  is  responsible  for  the  first 
steps  in  human  progress  there  arise  the  two  main 
perils  of  humanity  :  the  tendency  to  incest  and  the 
revolt  against  authority. 


VII 

THE   PLASTICITY    OF   HUIVIAN    INSTINCTS 

TXT'E  shall  proceed  presently  to  discuss  at  some 
length  the  two  perils  of  incest  and  revolt,  but  first 
let  us  rapidly  survey  the  gist  of  the  last  few  chapters 
in  which  the  family  among  man  and  animals  has  been 
compared.  We  found  that  in  both  the  general  course 
of  behaviour  is  paralleled  in  its  external  form.  Thus 
there  exists  a  circumscribed  courtship,  usually  limited 
in  time,  and  defined  in  its  form  both  in  human  com- 
munities and  in  animal  species.  Again,  selective  mating 
leads  to  an  exclusive  matrimonial  life  of  which  the 
monogamous  marriage  is  a  prevalent  type.  Finally 
in  animal  and  in  man  we  found  parenthood,  implying 
the  same  kind  of  cares  and  obligations.  In  short,  the 
forms  of  behaviour  and  their  functions  are  similar. 
The  preservation  of  species  through  selective  mating, 
conjugal  exclusiveness,  and  parental  care  is  the  main 
aim  of  human  institutions  as  well  as  of  animal 
instinctive  arrangements. 

Side  by  side  with  similarities  we  found  conspicuous 
differences.  These  were  not  in  the  ends  but  in  the  means 
by  which  the  ends  were  reached.  The  mechanism  by 
which  the  selection  of  mating  is  carried  on,  by  which 
matrimo-nial   relations   are   maintained   and   parental 

225  Q 


226  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

cares  established,  is  in  the  animal  entirely  innate  and 
based  on  anatomical  endowment,  physiological  change, 
and  instinctive  response.  The  whole  series  shows  the 
same  pattern  for  all  animals  of  the  species.  In  man  the 
mechanism  is  different.  While  there  exists  a  general 
tendency  to  court,  to  mate,  and  to  care  for  the  offspring 
and  while  this  tendency  is  as  strong  in  man  as  in  the 
animal,  it  is  no  longer  clearly  defined  once  and  for  all 
throughout  the  species.  The  landmark  has  disappeared 
and  has  been  replaced  by  cultural  limitations.  The 
sexual  impulse  is  permanently  active,  there  is  no  rut 
nor  any  automatic  disappearance  of  female  attraction 
afterwards.  There  is  no  natural  paternity,  and  even 
the  maternal  relations  are  not  exclusively  defined  by 
innate  responses.  Instead  of  the  precise  instinctive 
determinants  we  have  cultural  elements  which  shape 
the  innate  tendencies.  All  this  implies  a  deep  change 
in  the  relation  between  instinct  and  physiological 
process  and  the  modification  of  which  they  are  capable. 
This  change  we  have  termed  the  "  plasticity  of 
instincts  ".  The  expression  covers  the  set  of  facts 
described  above  in  detail.  They  aU  show  that  in  man 
the  various  physiological  elements  which  release  instinct 
have  disappeared,  while  at  the  same  time  there  appears 
a  traditional  training  of  the  innate  tendencies  into 
cultural  habit  responses.  These  cultural  mechanisms 
were  analyzed  concretely.  They  are  the  taboos  which 
forbid   incest   and   adultery ;    they   are   the   cultural 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  227 

releases  of  the  mating  instinct ;  they  are  the  moral 
and  ideal  norms  as  well  as  the  practical  inducements 
which  keep  husband  and  wife  together — the  legal 
sanction  of  the  marriage  tie  ;  the  dictates  which  shape 
and  express  parental  tendencies.  As  we  know,  all  these 
cultural  co-determinants  closely  follow  the  general 
course  imposed  by  nature  on  animal  behaviour.  In 
detail,  however,  the  concrete  forms  of  courtship, 
matrimony  and  parenthood  vary  with  the  culture  and 
the  forces  by  which  they  shape  human  behaviour 
are  no  longer  mere  instincts  but  habits  into  which 
man  has  been  educated  by  tradition.  The  social 
sanction  of  law,  the  pressure  of  public  opinion,  the 
psychological  sanction  of  religion  and  the  direct  induce- 
ments of  reciprocity  replace  the  automatic  drives  of 
the  instincts. 

Thus  culture  does  not  lead  man  into  any  direction 
divergent  from  the  courses  of  nature.  Man  still  has 
to  court  his  prospective  mate  and  she  still  has  to  choose 
and  to  yield  to  him.  The  two  still  have  to  keep  to  one 
another  and  be  ready  to  receive  the  offspring  and  watch 
over  them.  The  woman  still  has  to  bear  and  the  man 
to  remain  with  her  as  her  guardian.  Parents  still  have 
to  tend  and  educate  their  children,  and  under  culture 
they  are  as  attached  to  them  as  under  nature  animals 
are  to  their  offspring.  But  in  all  this  an  astounding 
variety  of  patterns  replaces  in  human  societies  the 
one  fixed  type  imposed  by  instinctive  endowment  upon 


228  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

all  the  individuals  of  a  single  animal  species.  The  direct 
response  of  instinct  is  replaced  by  traditional  norms. 
Custom,  law,  moral  rule,  ritual,  and  religious  value 
enter  into  all  the  stages  of  love-making  and  parenthood. 
But  the  main  line  of  their  action  invariably  runs  parallel 
to  that  of  animal  instincts.  The  chain  of  responses 
which  regulate  animal  mating  constitute  a  prototype 
of  the  gradual  unfolding  and  ripening  of  man's  cultural 
attitude.  We  must  pass  now  to  a  more  detailed  com- 
parison of  the  processes  of  animal  instincts  and  human 
sentiments. 


VIII 

FROM   INSTINCT  TO   SENTIMENT 

TN  the  last  chapter  we  summarized  the  salient  points 
of  our  comparison  between  the  constitution  of  the 
animal  and  the  human  family.  Through  the  dis- 
appearance of  the  definite  physiological  landmarks, 
through  the  increasing  cultural  control  in  man  there 
arises  a  complexity  in  the  human  response,  a  variety 
which  at  first  seems  to  introduce  nothing  but  chaos  and 
disorder.  This,  however,  is  not  really  the  case.  In  the 
frst  place  we  can  see  that  the  varying  emotional 
adjustments  of  mating  in  the  human  family  are 
simplified  in  one  direction.  The  human  bonds  culminate 
on  their  sexual  side  in  marriage,  on  their  parental  side 
in  a  life-long  enduring  family.  In  both  cases  the 
emotions  centre  around  one  definite  object,  whether 
this  be  the  consort,  the  child,  or  the  parent.  Thus  the 
exclusive  dominance  of  one  individual  appears  as  the 
first  characteristic  in  the  growth  of  human  emotional 
attitudes. 

As  a  matter  of  fact  we  can  see  this  tendency  even  as 
we  ascend  in  the  animal  kingdom  from  the  lower  to 
the  higher  species.  Among  the  lower  animals  the  male 
seed  is  often  scattered  broadcast  and  the  fertilizing  of 

229 


230  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

the  female  egg  is  left  entirely  to  physical  agencies. 
The  personal  equation,  selection  and  adjustment 
develop  gradually  and  attain  their  fullest  development 
among  the  highest  animals. 

In  man,  however,  this  tendency  is  translated  and 
enforced  by  definite  institutions.  Mating,  for  instance, 
is  defined  by  a  number  of  sociological  factors  some  of 
which  exclude  a  number  of  females,  while  others 
indicate  the  suitable  partners  or  stipulate  definite 
unions.  In  certain  forms  of  marriage  the  individual 
bond  is  completely  established  by  social  elements, 
such  as  infant  betrothal  or  socially  prearranged 
marriages.  In  any  case,  right  through  courtship, 
matrimonial  relations  and  the  care  of  the  children, 
the  two  individuals  gradually  establish  an  exclusive 
personal  tie.  A  number  of  interests  of  economic,  sexual, 
legal  and  religious  nature  are  for  each  partner  dominated 
by  the  personality  of  the  other.  The  legal  and  the 
religious  sanction  of  marriage  establishes,  as  we  know, 
a  lifelong,  socially  enforceable  bond  between  the  two. 
Thus  in  human  relations  the  emotional  adjustments 
are  dominated  by  one  object  rather  than  by  the 
situation  of  the  moment.  Within  the  same  relationship 
the  emotions  and  the  type  of  drives  and  interests 
vary  :  they  are  usually  one-sided  and  disconnected 
at  the  beginning  of  the  courtship,  they  gradually  ripen 
into  a  personal  affection  during  that  period,  they  are 
immensely  enriched  and  complicated  by  the  common 


INSTINCT  AND  CULTURE  231 

life  in  marriage,  even  more  so  by  the  arrival  of  children. 
Yet  throughout  this  variety  of  emotional  adjustments 
the  permanence  of  the  object,  its  deep  hold  on  the  other 
indivi<;iuars  life  constantly  increases.  The  bond  cannot 
be  broken  easily  and  the  resistances  are  usually  both 
psychological  and  social.  Divorce  in  savage  and  civilized 
communities,  for  instance,  or  a  rupture  between  parent 
and  child  is  both  a  personal  tragedy  and  a  sociological 
mishap. 

But  though  the  emotions  which  enter  into  the  human 
family  bond  are  constantly  changing — though  they 
depend  upon  circumstances — matrimonial  love,  for 
instance,  entailing  love  and  sorrow  as  well  as  joy,  fear, 
and  passionate  inclinations — though  they  are  always 
complex  and  never  exclusively  dominated  by  an 
instinct,  yet  they  are  by  no  means  chaotic  or  dis- 
organized, in  fact  they  are  arranged  into  definite 
systems.  The  general  attitude  of  one  consort  to  the 
other,  of  a  parent  to  a  child  and  vice  versa  is  not  in 
any  way  accidental.  Each  type  of  relationship  must 
dispose  of  a  number  of  emotional  attitudes  which 
subserve  certain  sociological  ends,  and  each  attitude 
gradually  grows  up  according  to  a  definite  scheme 
through  which  the  emotions  are  organized.  Thus  in 
the  relations  between  the  two  consorts  the  sentiment 
begins  with  the  gradual  awakening  of  sexual  passion. 
In  culture,  this,  as  we  know,  is  never  a  merely  instinctive 
moment.       Various    factors,     such    as    self-interest. 


232  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

economic  attraction,  social  advancement,  modify  the 
charm  of  a  girl  for  a  man  or  vice  versa,  in  low  levels 
of  culture  as  well  as  in  more  highly  developed 
civilizations.  This  interest  once  aroused,  the  passionate 
attitude  has  to  be  gradually  built  up  by  the  tradi- 
tional, customary  course  of  courtship  prevailing  in 
a  given  society.  No  sooner  has  this  attachment 
been  built  up,  than  the  decision  to  enter  marriage 
introduces  a  first  contract,  establishes  a  more  or  less 
sociologically  defined  relationship.  Through  this  period 
a  preparation  for  matrimonial  ties  takes  place.  The 
legal  bond  of  marriage  as  a  rule  changes  the  relation- 
ship in  which  the  sexual  elements  are  still  predominant 
mto  one  of  common  life,  and  here  the  emotional 
attitudes  have  to  become  reorganized.  It  is  important 
to  note  that  the  change  from  courtship  to  matrimony, 
which  in  all  societies  is  the  subject  of  proverbs  and  jokes, 
entails  a  definite  and  difficult  readjustment  of  attitudes  : 
while  in  the  human  relationship  the  sexual  elements 
are  not  eliminated  nor  the  memories  of  courtship 
effaced,  entirely  new  interests  and  new  emotions  have 
to  be  incorporated.  The  new  attitudes  are  built  upon 
the  foundation  of  the  old  and  personal  tolerance  and 
patience  in  trying  situations  have  to  be  formed  at 
the  expense  of  sexual  attractiveness.  The  initial 
charms  and  the  gratitude  for  the  erotic  pleasure 
of  earlier  life  have  a  definite  psychological  value 
and    form    an    integral    part    of    the    later    feelings. 


INSTINXT  AND  CULTURE  233 

We    find    in   this   an    important    element    of    human 
sentiments  :    the  carrying  over  of  previous  memories 
into    later   stages.     We    shall   presently   analyze   the 
relation    of   mother    to    child    and     father    to    son, 
and    show   there   that   the    same    system   of    gradual 
ripening   and    organizing   the    emotions   takes   place. 
There    is    always    a    dominant    emotional    attitude 
associated  with  the  bodily  relation.    Between  husband 
and  wife  sexual  desire  is  indispensable,  as  well  as  an 
associated  bond  of  personal  attractiveness  and  com- 
patibility of  character.     The  sentimental  elements  of 
courtship,   the  passionate  feelings  of  first  possession 
must  be  incorporated  into  the  calmer  affection,  allow- 
ing husband  and  wife  to  enjoy  each  other's  company 
throughout  the  best  part  of  their  days.   These  elements 
must  also  be  harmonized  with  the  community  of  work 
and  community  of  interest  which  unite  the  two  into 
the  joint  managers  of  the  household.  It  is  a  well-known 
fact  that  each  transition  between  courtship  and  sexual 
cohabitation,  between  that  stage  and  the  fuller  common 
life   of   later   matrimony,    between    married   life   and 
parental  life,   constitutes  a  crisis  full  of  difficulties, 
dangers  and  maladjustments.     These  are  the  points 
at  which  the  attitude  undergoes  a  special  phase  of 
reorganization. 

The  mechanism  which  we  see  at  work  in  this  process 
is  based  on  a  reaction  between  innate  drives,  human 
emotions  and  social  factors.     As  we  have  seen,  the 


234  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

organization  of  a  society  has  economic,  social,  and 
religious  ideals  to  impress  upon  the  sexual  inclination 
of  men  and  women.  These  exclude  certain  mates  by 
rules  of  exogamy,  of  caste  division,  or  of  mental 
training.  They  surround  others  by  a  spurious  halo  of 
economic  attractiveness,  of  high  rank,  or  superior 
social  status.  In  the  relation  between  parents  and 
children  also  tradition  dictates  certain  attitudes 
which  even  anticipate  the  appearance  of  the  objects 
to  which  they  pertain.  The  action  of  the  sociological 
mechanisms  is  specially  important  when  we  see  it  at 
work  in  the  growing  mentality  of  the  young.  Educa- 
tion, especially  in  simpler  societies,  does  not  take 
place  by  the  explicit  inculcation  of  sociological,  moral 
and  intellectual  principles,  but  rather  by  the  influence 
of  the  surrounding  cultural  environment  on  the 
ripening  mind.  Thus  the  child  learns  the  principles 
of  caste,  rank  or  clan  division  by  the  concrete  avoid- 
ances, preferences  and  submissions  into  which  he  is 
being  trained  by  practical  measures.  A  certain  ideal 
is  thus  impressed  upon  the  mind  and  by  the  time  the 
sexual  interest  begins  to  act  the  taboos  and  the 
inducements,  the  forms  of  correct  courtship,  the  ideals 
of  desirable  matrimony  are  framed  in  his  mind.  It  is 
imperative  to  realize  that  this  moulding  and  gradual 
inculcation  of  ideals  is  not  done  by  any  mysterious 
atmosphere,  but  by  a  number  of  well-defined,  concrete 
influences.      If  we  cast  back  to  the  previous  ideas  of 


INSTINCT  AND  CULTURE  235 

this  book  and  follow  the  hfe  of  an  individual  in 
peasant  Europe  or  savage  Melanesia  we  can  see 
how  the  child  within  the  parental  home  is  educated 
by  the  rebuke  of  the  parents,  by  the  public 
opinion  of  the  elder  men,  by  the  feeling  of  shame 
and  discomfort  aroused  by  the  reactions  of  them  to 
certain  types  of  his  conduct.  Thus  the  categories 
of  decent  and  indecent  are  created,  the  avoidance 
of  forbidden  relationships,  the  encouragement  towards 
certain  other  groups  and  the  subtler  tones  of  feeling 
toward  the  mother,  father,  maternal  uncle,  sister 
and  brother.  As  a  final  and  most  powerful  framework 
of  such  a  system  of  cultural  values,  we  have  to  note 
the  material  arrangements  of  habitation,  settlement, 
and  household  chattels.  Thus  in  Melanesia  the 
individual  family  house,  the  bachelors'  quarters,  the 
arrangements  of  patrilocal  marriage  and  of  matrilineal 
rights  are  all  associated,  on  the  one  hand  with  the 
structure  of  villages,  houses,  and  the  nature  of  territorial 
divisions,  and  on  the  other  with  injunctions,  taboos, 
moral  laws,  and  various  shades  of  feeling.  From  this 
we  can  see  that  man  gradually  expresses  his  emotional 
attitudes  in  legal,  social,  and  material  arrangements 
and  that  these  again  react  upon  his  conduct  by  mould- 
ing the  development  of  his  behaviour  and  outlook. 
Man  shapes  his  surroundings  according  to  his  cultural 
attitudes,  and  his  secondary  environment  again  produces 
the  typical  cultural  sentiments. 


236  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

And  this  brings  us  to  a  very  important  point  which 
will  allow  us  to  see  why  in  humanity  instinct  had  to 
become  plastic  and  innate  responses  have  to  be  trans- 
formed into  attitudes  or  sentiments. 

Culture  depends  directly  upon  the  degree  to  which 
the  human  emotions  can  be  trained,  adjusted,  and 
organized  into  complex  and  plastic  systems.  In  its 
ultimate  efficiency  culture  gives  man  mastery  over  his 
surroundings  by  the  development  of  mechanical  things, 
weapons,  means  of  transportation  and  measures  for 
protection  against  weather  and  climate.  These, 
however,  can  only  be  used  if  side  by  side  with  the 
apparatus  there  is  also  transmitted  the  traditional 
knowledge  and  art  of  using  it.  The  human  adjustments 
to  the  material  outfit  have  to  be  learned  anew  by  each 
generation.  Now  this  learning,  the  tradition  of  know- 
ledge, is  not  a  process  which  can  be  carried  on  by 
sheer  reason  nor  by  mere  instinctive  endowment. 
The  transmission  of  knowledge  from  one  generation 
to  another  entails  hardships,  efforts  and  an  inexhaustible 
fund  of  patience  and  love  felt  by  the  older  generation 
for  the  younger.  This  emotional  outfit,  again,  is 
only  partly  based  on  the  endowment,  for  all  the 
cultural  actions  which  it  dominates  are  artificial,  non- 
specific, and  therefore  not  provided  with  innate  drives. 
The  continuity  of  social  tradition,  in  other  words, 
entails  a  personal  emotional  relation  in  which  a  number 
of  responses  have  to  be  trained  and  developed  into 


INSTINCT  AND  CULTURE  237 

complex  attitudes.  The  extent  to  which  parents  can 
be  taxed  with  burdens  of  cultural  education  depends 
upon  the  capacity  of  the  human  character  for  adapta- 
tion to  cultural  and  social  responses.  Thus  in  one  of  its 
aspects  culture  is  directly  dependent  upon  the  plasticity 
of  innate  endowment. 

But  the  relation  of  man  to  culture  consists  not  only 
in  transmission  of  tradition  from  one  individual  to 
another  ;  culture  even  in  its  simplest  forms  cannot 
be  handled  except  by  co-operation.  As  we  have  seen, 
it  is  the  lengthening  of  the  ties  within  the  family 
beyond  strict  biological  maturity  which  allows  on  the 
one  hand  of  cultural  education  and  on  the  other  of 
work  in  common,  that  is,  co-operation.  The  animal 
family  of  course  has  also  a  rudimentary  division  of 
functions,  consisting  mainly  in  the  provision  of  food 
by  the  male  during  certain  stages  of  maternal  care  and 
later  on  in  the  protection  and  nutrition  afforded  by 
father  and  mother.  In  animal  species,  however,  both 
the  nutritive  adjustment  to  environment  and  the 
scheme  of  economic  division  of  functions  are  rigid 
Man  is  allowed  through  culture  to  adapt  himself  to  a 
very  wide  range  of  economic  environment  and  this 
he  controls,  not  by  rigid  instincts,  but  by  the  capacity 
for  developing  special  technique,  special  economic 
organization,  and  adjusting  himself  to  a  special  form 
of  diet.  But  side  by  side  with  this  merely  technical 
aspect  there  must  also  go  an  appropriate  division  of 


238  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

function  and  a  suitable  type  of  co-operation.  This 
obviously  entails  various  emotional  adjustments  under 
various  environmental  conditions.  The  economic 
duties  of  husband  and  wife  differ.  Thus  in  an  arctic 
environment  the  main  burden  of  providing  food  falls 
on  the  man  ;  among  the  more  primitive  agricultural 
peoples  the  woman  has  the  greater  share  of  providing 
for  the  household.  With  the  economic  division  of 
functions  there  are  associated  religious,  legal  and  moral 
distinctions  which  dovetail  into  economic  work.  The 
charm  of  social  prestige,  the  value  of  the  consort  as 
practical  helpmate,  the  ideal  of  moral  or  religious 
nature,  all  these  considerably  colour  the  relationship. 
It  is  its  variety  and  the  possibility  of  adjusting  such 
relations  as  the  conjugal  one  and  the  parental  one  which 
aUow  the  family  to  adapt  itself  to  varying  conditions 
of  practical  co-operation  and  this  latter  to  become 
adapted  to  the  material  outfit  of  culture  and  the 
natural  environment.  How  far  we  can  trace  concretely 
these  dependencies  and  correlations  is  beside  the  point 
in  our  present  argument.  I  wish  to  emphasize  here  the 
fact  that  only  plastic  social  ties  and  adjustable  systems 
of  emotion  can  function  in  an  animal  species  which  is 
capable  of  developing  a  secondary  environment  and 
thus  adjusting  itself  to  the  difficult  outer  conditions 
of  life. 

Through  all  this  we  can  see  that  although  the  basis 
of  human  family  relations  is  instinctive,  yet  the  more 


INSTINCT  AND  CULTURE  239 

they  can  be  moulded  by  experience  and  by  education, 
the  more  cultural  and  traditional  elements  these  ties 
can  accept,  the  more  suitable  will  they  be  for  a  varied 
and  complex  division  of  functions. 

What  has  been  said  here  with  reference  to  the  family 
refers  obviously  also  to  other  social  ties.  But  in  these, 
contrary  to  what  is  the  case  with  the  bonds  of  the 
family,  the  instinctive  element  is  almost  negligible.  The 
great  theoretical  importance  of  marriage  and  of  the 
family  runs  parallel  with  the  great  practical  importance 
of  these  institutions  for  humanity.  Not  only  is  the 
family  the  link  between  biological  cohesion  and  social 
cohesion,  it  is  also  the  pattern  on  which  all  wider 
relations  are  based.  The  further  sociologists  and 
anthropologists  can  work  out  the  theory  of  senti- 
ments, of  their  formation  under  cultural  conditions  and 
of  their  correlation  with  social  organization,  the  nearer 
shall  we  move  towards  a  correct  understanding  of 
primitive  sociology.  Incidentally  I  think  that  an 
exhaustive  description  of  primitive  family  life,  primitive 
courtship  customs  and  clan  organization  will  rule 
out  from  sociology  such  words  as  "  group  instinct  ", 
"  consciousness  of  kind  ",  "  group  mind  ",  and 
similar  sociological  verbal  panaceas. 

To  those  acquainted  with  modern  psychology  it 
must  have  become  clear  that  in  working  out  a  theory 
of  primitive  sociology  we  had  to  reconstruct  an 
important  theory  of  human  emotions,  developed  by 


240  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

one  who  unquestionably  deserves  to  be  ranked  as  one 
of  the  greatest  psychologists  of  our  time.  Mr.  A.  F. 
Shand  was  the  first  to  point  out  that  in  the  classifica- 
tion of  human  feelings,  in  the  construction  of  the 
laws  of  emotional  life,  we  can  reach  tangible  results 
only  when  we  realize  that  human  emotions  do  not  float 
in  an  empty  space,  but  are  all  grouped  around  a  number 
of  objects.  Around  these  objects  human  emotions 
are  organized  into  definite  systems.  Furthermore, 
Shand,  in  his  book  on  The  Foundations  of  Character, 
has  laid  down  a  number  of  laws  whicji  govern  the 
organization  of  emotions  into  sentiments.  He  has 
shown  that  the  moral  problems  of  human  character 
can  be  solved  only  by  a  study  of  the  organization  of  the 
emotions.  In  our  present  argument,  it  has  been  possible 
to  apply  Shand's  theory  of  sentiments  to  a  sociological 
problem,  and  to  show  that  a  correct  analysis  of  the 
change  from  animal  to  cultural  responses  vindicates 
his  views  to  the  full.  The  salient  points  which  dis- 
tinguish human  attachments  from  animal  instincts 
are  the  dominance  of  the  object  over  the  situation  ; 
the  organization  of  emotional  attitudes  ;  the  continuity 
of  the  building  up  of  such  attitudes  and  their  crystalliza- 
tion into  permanent  adjustable  systems.  Our  additions 
to  Shand's  theory  consist  only  in  showing  how  the 
formation  of  sentiments  is  associated  with  social 
organization  and  with  the  wielding  of  material  culture 
by  man. 


INSTINCT  AND  CULTURE  241 

An  important  point  which  Shand  has  brought  out 
in  his  study  of  human  sentiment  is  that  the  leading 
emotions  which  enter  into  them  are  not  independent 
of  each  other,  but  that  they  show  certain  tendencies 
towards  exclusion  and  repression.  In  the  analysis 
which  follows  we  shall  have  to  elaborate  on  the  two 
typical  relations  between  mother  and  child  on  the  one 
hand  and  the  father  and  child  on  the  other.  This  will 
also  help  to  reveal  the  processes  of  gradual  clearing  off 
and  of  repression  by  which  certain  elements  have  to 
be  eliminated  from  a  sentiment  as  it  develops. 

And  here  we  should  like  to  add  that  Shand 's  theory 
of  sentiments  stands  really  in  a  very  close  relation  to 
psycho-analysis.  Both  of  them  deal  with  the  concrete 
emotional  processes  in  the  life  history  of  the  individual. 
Both  of  them  have  independently  recognized  that  it 
is  only  by  the  study  of  the  actual  configurations  of 
human  feelings  that  we  can  arrive  at  satisfactory  results. 
Had  the  founders  of  psycho-analysis  known  Shand's 
contribution,  they  might  have  avoided  a  number  of 
metaphysical  pitfalls,  realized  that  instinct  is  a  part 
of  human  sentiments  and  not  a  metaphysical  entity, 
and  given  us  a  much  less  mystical  and  more  concrete 
psychology  of  the  unconscious.  On  the  other  hand, 
Freud  has  supplemented  the  theory  of  sentiments  on 
two  capital  points.  He  was  the  first  to  state  clearly 
that  the  family  was  the  locus  of  sentiment  formation. 
He  also  has  shown  that  in  the  formation  of  senti- 


242  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

ments  the  process  of  elimination,  of  clearing  away,  is  of 
paramount  importance  and  that  in  this  process  the 
mechanism  of  repression  is  the  source  of  conspicuous 
dangers.  The  forces  of  repression,  assigned  by  psycho- 
analysts to  the  mysterious  endo-psychic  censor  can, 
however,  be  placed  by  the  present  analysis  into  a 
more  definite  and  concrete  setting.  The  forces  of 
repression  are  the  forces  of  the  sentiment  itself.  They 
come  from  the  principle  of  consistency  which  every 
sentiment  requires  in  order  to  be  useful  in  social 
behaviour.  The  negative  emotions  of  hate  and  anger 
are  incompatible  with  the  submission  to  parental 
authority  and  the  reverence  and  trust  in  cultural 
guidance.  Sensual  elements  cannot  enter  into  the 
relation  of  mother  and  son  if  this  relation  is  to  remain 
in  harmony  with  the  natural  division  of  functions 
obtaining  within  the  household.  To  these  questions 
we  pass  in  the  following  chapter. 


IX 

MOTHERHOOD   AND   THE   TEMPTATIONS    OF 
INCEST 

'  I  'HE  subject  of  the  "  origins  "  of  incest  prohibitions 
is  one  of  the  most  discussed  and  vexed  questions 
of  anthropology.  It  is  associated  with  the  problem  of 
exogamy  or  of  primitive  forms  of  marriage,  with 
hypotheses  of  former  promiscuity  and  so  on.  There  is 
not  the  slightest  doubt  that  exogamy  is  correlated  with 
the  prohibition  of  incest,  that  it  is  merely  an  extension 
of  this  taboo,  exactly  as  the  institution  of  the  clan  with 
its  classificatory  terms  of  relationship  is  simply  an 
extension  of  the  family  and  its  mode  of  kinship 
nomenclature.  We  shall  not  enter  into  this  problem, 
especially  because  in  this  we  are  in  agreement  with 
such  anthropologists  as  Westermarck  and  Lowie.^ 

To  clear  the  ground  it  will  be  well  to  remember  that 
biologists  are  in  agreement  on  the  point  that  there  is 
no  detrimental  effect  produced  upon  the  species  by 
incestuous  unions. ^     Whether  incest  in  the  state  of 

^  Compare  Westermarck's  History  of  Human  Marriage  and 
Lowie's  Primitive  Society.  Some  additional  arguments  will 
be  contributed  by  the  present  writer  in  the  forthcoming  book  on 
Kinship. 

*  For  a  discussion  of  the  biological  nature  of  inbreeding,  cf. 
Pitt-Rivers,   The  Contact  of  Races  and  the  Clash  of  Culture,   1927. 

243 


244  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

nature  might  be  detrimental  if  it  occurred  regularly 
is  an  academic  question.  In  the  state  of  nature  the 
young  animals  leave  the  parental  group  at  maturity 
and  mate  at  random  with  any  females  encountered 
during  rut.  Incest  at  best  can  be  but  a  sporadic 
occurrence.  In  animal  incest,  then,  there  is  no  bio- 
logical harm  nor  obviously  is  there  any  moral  harm. 
Moreover,  there  is  no  reason  to  suppose  that  in 
animals  there  is  any  special  temptation. 

While  with  the  animal  then  there  is  neither  bio- 
logical danger  nor  temptation  and  in  consequence  no 
instinctive  barriers  against  incest,  with  man,  on  the 
contrary,  we  find  in  all  societies  that  the  strongest 
barrier  and  the  most  fundamental  prohibition  are 
those  against  incest.  This  we  shall  try  to  explain, 
not  by  any  hypotheses  about  a  primitive  act  of 
legislation  nor  by  any  assumptions  of  special  aversion 
to  sexual  intercourse  with  inmates  of  the  same  house- 
hold, but  as  the  result  of  two  phenomena  which 
spring  up  under  culture.  In  the  first  place,  under  the 
mechanisms  which  constitute  the  human  family  serious 
temptations  to  incest  arise.  In  the  second  place, 
side  by  side  with  the  sex  temptations,  specific  perils 
come  into  being  for  the  human  family,  due  to  the 
existence  of  the  incestuous  tendencies.  On  the  first 
point,  therefore,  we  have  to  agree  with  Freud  and 
disagree  with  the  well-known  theory  of  Westermarck, 
who  assumes  innate  disinclination  to  mate  between 


INSTINCT  AND  CULTURE  245 

members  of  the  same  household.  In  assuming,  how- 
ever, a  temptation  to  incest  under  culture,  we  do 
not  follow  the  psycho-analytic  theory  which  regards 
the  infantile  attachment  to  the  mother  as  essentially 
sexual. 

This  is  perhaps  the  main  thesis  which  Freud  has 
attempted  to  establish  in  his  three  contributions  to 
sexual  theory.  He  tries  to  prove  that  the  relations 
between  a  smaU  child  and  its  mother,  above  all  in  the 
act  of  suckling,  are  essentially  sexual.  From  this 
it  results  that  the  first  sexual  attachment  of  a  male 
towards  the  mother  is,  in  other  words,  normally  an 
incestuous  attachment.  "  This  fixation  of  libido,"  to 
use  a  psycho-analytic  phrase,  remains  throughout  life, 
and  it  is  the  source  of  the  constant  incestuous  tempta- 
tions which  have  to  be  repressed  and  as  such  form  one 
of  the  two  components  of  the  CEdipus  complex. 

This  theory  it  is  impossible  to  adopt.  The  relation 
between  an  infant  and  its  mother  is  essentially  different 
from  a  sexual  attitude.  Instincts  must  be  defined  not 
simply  by  introspective  methods,  not  merely  by  analysis 
of  the  feeling  tones  such  as  pain  and  pleasure,  but  above 
all  by  their  function.  An  instinct  is  a  more  or  less 
definite  innate  mechanism  by  which  the  individual 
responds  to  a  specific  situation  by  a  definite  form  of 
behaviour  in  satisfaction  of  definite  organic  wants. 
The  relation  of  the  suckling  to  its  mother  is  first  of 
all  induced  by  the  desire  for  nutrition.     The  bodily 


246  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

clinging  of  a  child  to  its  mother  again  satisfies  its 
bodily  wants  of  warmth,  protection  and  guidance. 
The  child  is  not  fit  to  cope  with  the  environment  by 
its  own  forces  alone,  and  as  the  only  medium  through 
which  it  can  act  is  the  maternal  organism  it  clings 
instinctively  to  the  mother.  In  sexual  relations  the 
aim  of  bodily  attraction  and  cUnging  is  that  union 
which  leads  to  impregnation.  Each  of  these  two  innate 
tendencies — the  mother-to-child  behaviour  and  the 
process  of  mating — cover  a  big  range  of  preparatory 
and  consummatory  actions  which  present  certain 
similarities.  The  line  of  division,  however,  is  clear, 
because  one  set  of  acts,  tendencies  and  feelings  serves 
to  complete  the  infant's  unripe  organism,  to  nourish, 
to  protect  and  warm  it ;  the  other  set  of  acts  sub- 
serves the  union  of  sexual  organs  and  the  production 
of  a  new  individual. 

We  cannot  therefore  accept  the  simple  solution  that 
the  temptation  of  incest  is  due  to  sexual  relation  between 
the  infant  and  mother.  The  sensuous  pleasure  which  is 
common  to  both  relations  is  a  component  of  every 
successful  instinctive  behaviour.  The  pleasure  index 
cannot  serve  to  differentiate  instincts,  since  it  is  a 
general  character  of  them  all.  But  although  we  have 
to  postulate  different  instincts  for  each  emotional 
attitude  yet  there  is  one  element  common  to  them  both. 
It  is  not  merely  that  they  are  endowed  with  the  general 
pleasure  tone  of  all  instincts,  but  there  is  also  a  sensuous 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  247 

pleasure  derived  from  bodily  contact.  The  active 
exercise  of  the  drive  which  a  child  feels  towards  its 
mother's  organism  consists  in  the  permanent  clinging 
to  the  mother's  body  in  the  fullest  possible  epidermic 
contact,  above  all  in  the  contact  of  the  child's  hps 
with  the  mother's  nipple.  The  analogy  between  the 
preparatory  actions  of  the  sexual  drive  and  the  com- 
summatory  actions  of  the  infantile  impulse  are  remark- 
able. The  two  are  to  be  distinguished  mainly  by  their 
function  and  by  the  essential  difference  between  the 
consummatory  actions  in  each  case. 

What  is  the  result  of  this  partial  similarity  ?  We  can 
borrow  from  psycho-analysis  the  principle  which 
has  now  become  generally  accepted  in  psychology 
that  there  are  no  experiences  in  later  life  which  would 
not  stir  up  analogous  memories  from  infancy.  Again, 
from  Shand's  theory  of  sentiments  we  know  that  the 
sentimental  attitudes  in  human  Ufe  entail  a  gradual 
organization  of  emotions.  To  these  we  found  it 
necessary  to  add  that  the  continuity  of  emotional 
memories  and  the  gradual  building  of  one  attitude  on 
the  pattern  of  another  form  the  main  principle  of 
sociological  bonds. 

If  we  apply  this  to  the  formation  of  the  sexual 
attitude  between  lovers  we  can  see  that  the 
bodily  contact  in  sexual  relations  must  have  a  very 
disturbing  retrospective  effect  upon  the  relation 
between  mother  and  son.  The  caresses  of  lovers  employ 


248  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

not  only  the  same  medium — epidermis  ;  not  only  the 
same  situation — embraces,  cuddling,  the  maximum 
of  personal  approach  ;  but  they  entail  also  the  same 
type  of  sensuous  feelings.  When  therefore  this  new 
type  of  drive  enters  it  must  invariably  awaken  the 
memories  of  earlier  similar  experiences.  But  these 
memories  are  associated  with  a  definite  object  which 
remains  in  the  foreground  of  an  individual's  emotional 
interests  throughout  life.  This  object  is  the  person  of 
the  mother.  With  regard  to  this  person  the  erotic  life 
introduces  disturbing  memories  which  stand  in  direct 
contradiction  to  the  attitude  of  reverence,  submission 
and  cultural  dependence  which  in  the  growing  boy 
has  already  completely  repressed  the  early  infantile 
sentimental  attachment.  The  new  type  of  erotic 
sensuality  and  the  new  sexual  attitude  blend  disturb- 
ingly with  the  memories  of  early  life  and  threaten  to 
break  up  the  organized  system  of  emotions  which  has 
been  built  up  around  the  mother.  This  attitude,  for 
purposes  of  cultural  education,  has  become  less  and 
less  sensual,  more  and  more  coloured  by  mental  and 
moral  dependence,  by  interest  in  practical  matters, 
by  social  sentiments  associated  with  the  mother  as  the 
centre  of  the  household.  We  have  seen  already  in  the 
previous  chapters  of  this  book  how  at  this  stage  the 
relation  between  the  boy  and  his  mother  is  clouded 
over  and  how  a  reorganization  of  the  sentiments  has 
to  take  place.    It  is  at  this  time  that  strong  resistances 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  249 

arise  in  the  individual's  mind,  that  all  sensuality 
felt  towards  the  mother  becomes  repressed,  and  that 
the  subconscious  temptation  of  incest  arises  from  the 
blending  of  early  memories  with  new  experiences. 

The  difference  between  this  explanation  and  that  of 
psycho-analysis  consists  in  the  fact  that  Freud  assumes 
a  continuous  persistence  from  infancy  of  the  same 
attitude  towards  the  mother.  In  our  argument  we  try 
to  show  that  there  is  only  a  partial  identity  between  the 
early  and  the  later  drives,  that  this  identity  is  due 
essentially  to  the  mechanism  of  sentiment  formation  ; 
that  this  explains  the  non-existence  of  temptations 
among  animals  ;  and  that  the  retrospective  power  of 
new  sentiments  in  man  is  the  cause  of  incestuous 
temptations. 

We  have  now  to  ask  why  this  temptation  is  really 
dangerous  to  man  although  it  is  innocuous  to  animals. 
We  have  seen  that  in  man  the  development  of  emotions 
into  organized  sentiments  is  the  very  essence  of  social 
bonds  and  of  cultural  progress.  As  Mr.  Shand  has 
convincingly  proved,  such  systems  are  subject  to 
definite  laws  :  they  must  be  harmonious,  i.e.,  emotions 
consistent  with  one  another,  and  the  sentiments  so 
organized  that  they  will  allow  of  co-operation,  con- 
tinuity of  blending.  Now  within  the  family  the 
sentiment  between  mother  and  child  begins  with  the 
early  sensuous  attachment  which  binds  the  two  with 
a  deep  innate  interest.  Later  on,  however,  this  attitude 


250  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

has  to  change.  The  mother's  function  consists  in  educat- 
ing, guiding  and  exercising  cultural  influence  and 
domestic  authority.  As  the  son  grows  up  he  has  to 
respond  to  this  by  the  attitude  of  submission  and 
reverence.  During  childhood,  that  is  during  this 
extremely  long  period  in  psychological  reckoning  which 
occurs  after  weaning  and  before  maturity,  emotions  of 
reverence,  dependence,  respect,  as  well  as  strong  attach- 
ment must  give  the  leading  tone  to  the  boy's  relation 
to  his  mother.  At  that  time  also  a  process  of  emancipa- 
tion, of  severing  all  bodily  contacts  must  proceed 
and  become  completed.  The  family  at  this  stage  is 
essentially  a  cultural  and  not  a  biological  workshop. 
The  father  and  the  mother  are  training  the  child  into 
independence  and  into  cultural  maturity ;  their 
physiological  role  is  already  over. 

Now  into  such  a  situation  the  inclination  towards 
incest  would  enter  as  a  destructive  element.  Any 
approach  of  the  mother  with  sensual  or  erotic 
temptations  would  involve  the  disruption  of  the 
relationship  so  laboriously  constructed.  Mating  with 
her  would  have  to  be,  as  all  mating  must  be,  preceded 
by  courtship  and  a  type  of  behaviour  completely 
incompatible  with  submission,  independence  and 
reverence.  The  mother,  moreover,  is  not  alone.  She 
is  married  to  another  male.  Any  sensual  temptation 
would  not  only  upset  completely  the  relation  between 
son   and  mother  but   also,  indirectly,   that  between 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  251 

son  and  father.  Active  hostile  rivalry  would 
replace  the  harmonious  relationship  which  is  the 
type  of  complete  dependence  and  thorough  sub- 
mission to  leadership.  If,  therefore,  we  agree  with  the 
psycho-analysts  that  incest  must  be  a  universal 
temptation,  we  see  that  its  dangers  are  not  merely 
psychological  nor  can  they  be  explained  by  any  such 
hypotheses  as  that  of  Freud's  primeval  crime.  Incest 
must  be  forbidden  because,  if  our  analysis  of  the 
family  and  its  role  in  the  formation  of  culture  be 
correct,  incest  is  incompatible  with  the  estabUsh- 
ment  of  the  first  foundations  of  culture.  In  any  type 
of  civilization  in  which  custom,  morals,  and  law  would 
allow  incest,  the  family  could  not  continue  to  exist. 
At  maturity  we  would  witness  the  breaking  up  of  the 
family,  hence  complete  social  chaos  and  an  impossi- 
bility of  continuing  cultural  tradition.  Incest  would 
mean  the  upsetting  of  age  distinctions,  the  mixing  up 
of  generations,  the  disorganization  of  sentiments  and 
a  violent  exchange  of  roles  at  a  time  when  the  family 
is  the  most  important  educational  medium.  No  society 
could  exist  under  such  conditions.  The  alternative 
type  of  culture  under  which  incest  is  excluded,  is  the 
only  one  consistent  with  the  existence  of  social 
organization  and  culture. 

Our  type  of  explanation  agrees  essentially  with  the 
view  of  Atkinson  and  Lang,  which  makes  the  pro- 
hibition of  incest  the  primal  law,  although  our  argu- 


252  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

ment  differs  from  their  hypothesis.  We  differ  also  from 
Freud  in  that  we  cannot  accept  incest  as  due  to  the 
innate  behaviour  of  the  infant.  From  Westermarck 
we  differ  in  so  far  as  the  aversion  to  incest  does  not 
appear  to  us  as  the  natural  impulse,  a  simple  tendency 
not  to  cohabit  with  persons  living  in  the  same  house 
from  infancy,  but  rather  as  a  complex  scheme  of  cultural 
reactions.  We  have  been  able  to  deduce  the  necessity 
of  the  incest  taboo  from  the  change  in  instinctive 
endowment  which  must  run  parallel  with  social 
organization  and  culture.  Incest,  as  a  normal  mode  of 
behaviour,  cannot  exist  in  humanity,  because  it  is 
incompatible  with  family  life  and  would  disorganize 
its  very  foundations.  The  fundamental  pattern  of  aU 
social  bonds,  the  normal  relation  of  the  child  to  the 
mother  and  the  father,  would  be  destroyed.  From 
the  composition  of  each  of  these  sentiments  the 
instinct  of  sex  must  be  eliminated.  This  instinct  is 
the  most  difficult  to  control,  the  least  compatible  with 
others.  The  temptation  to  incest,  therefore,  has 
been  introduced  by  culture,  by  the  necessity  of 
establishing  -permanent  organized  attitudes.  It  is 
therefore,  in  a  sense,  the  original  sin  of  man.  This 
must  be  atoned  for  in  all  human  societies  by  one  of 
the  most  important  and  universal  rules.  Even  then 
the  taboo  of  incest  haunts  man  throughout  life,  as 
psycho-analysis  has  revealed  to  us. 


X 

AUTHORITY   AND   REPRESSION 

TN  the  previous  chapter  we  have  been  mainly 
interested  in  the  relation  between  the  mother  and 
the  son  ;  here  we  shall  discuss  that  between  the  father 
and  the  son.  In  this  discussion  the  daughter  recdves 
but  Uttle  of  our  attention.  On  the  one  hand,  as  results 
from  all  that  has  been  said  above  in  Chap.  IX,  incest 
between  father  and  daughter  is  less  important,  while 
on  the  other,  the  conflicts  between  the  mother  and  the 
daughter  are  not  so  conspicuous.  In  any  case  what  is 
said  about  mother  and  son  and  father  and  son  can 
refer  with  Uttle  modification  and  on  a  less  pronounced 
scale  to  the  other  set  of  relations.  The  cast  of  the 
Freudian  (Edipus  tragedy,  therefore,  in  which  the  son 
again  figures  in  relation  to  both  parents,  is  anthro- 
pologically quite  correct.  Freud  has  refused  even  to 
place  Electra  side  by  side  with  (Edipus,  and  we  have 
to  countersign  this  act  of  ostracism. 

In  discussing  previously  the  relation  between  father 
and  son  we  have  definitely  affirmed  the  instinctive 
basis  of  this  relationship.  The  human  family  is  in  need 
of  a  male,  as  definitely  as  the  animal  family,  and  in  all 
human  societies  this  biological  need  is  expressed  in  the 

253 


254  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

principle  of  legitimacy  which  demands  a  male  as  the 
guardian,  protector,  and  regent  of  the  family. 

It  would  be  useless  to  speculate  upon  the  role  of  the 
animal  father  as  a  source  of  authority  within  the 
family.  It  seems  unlikely  that  he  should  ever  develop 
into  a  t3a'ant,  because  as  long  as  he  is  indispensable 
to  his  children  he  presumably  possesses  a  fund  of  natural 
tenderness  and  forbearance.  When  he  ceases  to  be 
useful  to  the  offspring  they  leave  him. 

Under  conditions  of  culture  the  father's  authority, 
however,  is  indispensable,  because  at  the  later  stages, 
when  the  parents  and  children  have  to  remain  together 
for  the  purpose  of  cultural  training,  there  is  need 
for  some  authority  to  enforce  order  within  the  family, 
as  indeed  within  any  other  form  of  human  grouping. 
Such  grouping,  based  on  cultural  and  not  on  biological 
needs,  lacks  perfect  instinctive  adjustment,  implies 
friction  and  difficulties  and  needs  the  legal  sanction 
of  some  sort  of  force. 

But  though  the  father  or  some  other  male  must 
become  invested  with  authority  at  later  stages,  his 
role  in  the  earlier  periods  is  entirely  different.  As 
in  the  earliest  stages  of  animal  family,  where  the  male 
is  present  to  protect  the  pregnant  and  lactant  femcde, 
so  also  in  the  earlier  stages  of  the  human  family  the 
father  is  a  guard  and  a  nurse  rather  than  the  male  in 
authority.  When  he  shares  the  taboos  of  pregnancy 
with  his  wife,  and  watches  over  her  welfare  at  that 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  255 

time,  when  he  becomes  confined  during  his  wife's 
pregnancy,  when  he  nurses  the  babies,  his  bodily  force, 
his  moral  authority,  his  reUgious  prerogative  and  his 
legal  power  do  not  come  into  play  at  all.  In  the  first 
place,  what  he  has  to  do  at  those  stages  is  regarded 
as  a  duty  and  not  as  a  prerogative.  In  many  of  those 
intimate  functions  a  man  has  to  play  the  part  of  a 
woman — often  in  a  somewhat  undignified  manner — 
or  he  has  to  assist  her  in  certain  tasks.  Yet  at  the  same 
time  he  is  often  excluded  and  submitted  to  ridiculous 
and  humiliating  attitudes — sometimes  even  regarded 
by  the  community  as  such — while  his  wife  performs 
the  important  affairs  of  life.  In  all  this,  as  we  have 
repeatedly  emphasized,  the  father  acts  in  a  meek  and 
willing  manner  ;  he  is  usually  very  happy  in  per- 
forming his  duties,  interested  in  his  wife's  welfare, 
and  delighted  with  the  small  infant. 

The  whole  series  of  customs,  ideas  and  social 
patterns  imposed  on  the  man  by  his  culture  is  clearly 
correlated  with  his  value  to  the  family,  with  his 
utility  to  the  species  at  that  time.  The  father  is  made 
to  behave  like  a  loving,  kind,  and  solicitous  person,  he 
is  made  to  subordinate  himself  to  his  wife's  organic 
activities,  because  at  this  stage  his  protection,  his  love, 
and  his  tender  emotions  make  him  into  an  efficient 
guardian  of  his  wife  and  children.  Thus  here  again 
the  end  of  cultural  behaviour  among  human  beings 
is  the  same   as   that  of    innate    endowment    among 


256  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

animal  species  :  this  end  is  to  shape  an  attitude  of 
protective  tenderness  on  the  part  of  the  male  towards 
his  pregnant  mate  and  her  offspring.  But  under 
conditions  of  culture  the  protective  attitude  has  to 
last  much  longer — beyond  the  biological  maturity  of 
the  young — while  again,  a  much  greater  burden  is 
placed  upon  the  initial  instalment  of  emotional  tender- 
ness. And  here  we  find  the  essential  difference  between 
the  animal  and  the  human  family,  for  while  the  animal 
family  dissolves  with  the  cessation  of  the  biological 
need  for  parental  care,  the  human  family  has  to  endure. 
After  that  moment  the  family  under  culture  has  to  start 
on  a  process  of  education  in  which  parental  tenderness, 
love  and  care  are  no  longer  sufficient.  Cultural  training 
is  not  merely  the  gradual  development  of  innate 
faculties.  Besides  an  instruction  in  arts  and  knowledge, 
this  training  also  implies  the  building  up  of  sentimental 
attitudes,  the  inculcation  of  laws  and  customs,  the 
development  of  morality.  And  all  this  implies  one 
element  which  we  have  found  already  in  the  relation 
between  child  and  mother,  the  element  of  taboo, 
repression,  of  negative  imperatives.  Education  consists 
in  the  last  instance  in  the  building  up  of  complex  and 
artificial  habit  responses,  of  the  organization  of 
emotions  into  sentiments. 

As  we  know,  this  building  up  takes  place  through 
the  various  manifestations  of  public  opinion  and  of 
moral  feeUng,  by  the  constant  influence  of  the  moral 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  257 

pressure  to  which  the  growing  child  is  exposed.  Above 
all  it  is  determined  by  the  influence  of  that  framework 
of  tribal  life  which  is  made  up  of  material  elements 
and  within  which  the  child  gradually  grows  up,  to 
have  its  impulses  moulded  into  a  number  of  senti- 
ment patterns.  This  process,  however,  requires  a 
background  of  effective  personal  authority,  and  here 
again  the  child  comes  to  distinguish  between  the 
female  side  of  social  life  and  the  male  side.  The  women 
who  look  after  him  represent  the  nearer  and  more 
familiar  influence,  domestic  tenderness,  the  help,  the 
rest  and  the  solace  to  which  the  child  can  always 
turn.  The  male  aspect  becomes  gradually  the  principle 
of  force,  of  distance,  of  pursuit  of  ambition  and  of 
authority.  This  distinction  obviously  develops  only 
after  the  earlier  period  of  infancy,  in  which,  as  we  have 
seen,  the  father  and  the  mother  play  a  similar  part. 
Later  on,  though  the  mother,  side  by  side  with  the 
father,  has  to  train  and  teach  the  child,  she  still 
continues  the  tradition  of  tenderness,  while  the  father 
in  most  cases  has  to  supply  at  least  a  minimum  of 
authority  within  the  family. 

At  a  certain  age,  however,  there  comes  the  time  at 
which  the  male  child  becomes  detached  from  the 
family  and  launches  into  the  world.  In  communities 
where  there  are  initiation  ceremonies  this  is  done  by 
an  elaborate  and  special  institution,  in  which  the  new 
order  of  law  and  morality  is  expounded  to  the  novice. 


258  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

the  existence  of  authority  displayed,  tribal  conditions 
taught  and  very  often  hammered  into  the  body  by  a 
system  of  privations  and  ordeals.  From  the  socio- 
logical point  of  view,  the  initiations  consist  in  the 
weaning  of  the  boy  from  the  domestic  shelter  and  sub- 
mitting him  to  tribal  authority.  In  cultures  where  there 
is  no  initiation  the  process  is  gradual  and  diffused,  but 
its  elements  are  never  absent.  The  boy  is  gradually 
allowed  or  encouraged  to  leave  the  house  or  to  work 
himself  loose  from  the  household  influences,  he  is 
instructed  in  tribal  tradition  and  submitted  to  male 
authority. 

But  the  male  authority  is  not  necessarily  that  of 
the  father.  In  the  earlier  part  of  this  book  it  is  shown 
how  such  submission  of  the  boy  to  paternal  authority 
works  and  what  it  means.  We  reformulate  it  here 
in  the  terminology  of  our  present  argument.  In 
societies  where  the  authority  is  placed  in  the  hands 
of  the  maternal  uncle  the  father  can  remain  the 
domestic  helpmate  and  friend  of  his  sons.  The  father 
to  son  sentiment  can  develop  simply  and  directly. 
The  early  infantile  attitudes  gradually  and  continually 
ripen  with  the  interests  of  boyhood  and  maturity. 
The  father  in  later  life  plays  a  role  not  entirely  dissimilar 
to  that  at  the  threshold  of  existence.  Authority,  tribal 
ambition,  repressive  elements  and  coercive  measures 
are  associated  with  another  sentiment,  centring 
round  the  person  of  the  maternal  uncle  and  building 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  259 

up  along  entirely  different  lines.  In  the  light  of  the 
psychology  of  sentiment  formation,  and  here  I  must 
refer  to  Shand's  account,  it  is  obvious  that  such  a 
growth  of  two  sentiments,  each  simply  and  internally 
harmonious,  would  be  infinitely  easier  than  the 
building  up  of  the  paternal  relation  under  father-right. 
Under  father-right  the  paternal  role  is  associated 
with  two  elements  each  of  which  creates  considerable 
difficulty  in  the  building  up  of  the  sentiment.  Where 
this  mode  of  reckoning  of  descent  is  associated  with 
some  pronounced  form  of  patria  potestas  the  father  has 
to  adopt  the  position  of  the  final  arbiter  in  force  and 
authority.  He  has  gradually  to  cast  off  the  role  of 
tender  and  protective  friend,  and  to  adopt  the  position 
of  strict  judge,  and  hard  executor  of  law.  This  change 
involves  the  incorporation  within  the  sentiment  of 
attitudes  which  are  as  diametrically  opposed  to  one 
another  as  the  attitude  of  sensuous  desire  and  reverence 
within  the  maternal  sentiment.  There  is  no  need, 
perhaps,  to  develop  this  point,  to  show  how  difficult 
it  is  to  link  up  confidence  with  repressive  powers, 
tenderness  with  authority,  and  friendship  with  rule, 
for  on  all  these  we  have  dwelt  exhaustively  in  the 
earher  parts  of  the  book.  There  also  we  have  spoken 
of  the  other  aspect  which  is  always  associated  with 
father-right,  even  where  this  does  not  imply  a  definite 
paternal  authority,  for  the  father  has  always  to  be 
dispossessed  and  replaced  by  the  son.     Even  though 


26o  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

his  powers  might  be  Hmited  he  is  yet  the  principal 
male  of  the  older  generation,  represents  law,  tribal 
duties  and  repressive  taboos.  He  stands  for  coercion, 
for  morality,  and  for  the  limiting  social  forces.  Here 
also  the  building  up  of  the  relationship  upon  the  initial 
foundation  of  tenderness  and  effective  response  into 
an  attitude  of  repression  is  not  easy.  All  this  we  know. 
Here,  however,  it  is  important  to  place  this 
knowledge  into  our  present  argument  :  in  the  develop- 
ment of  the  human  family  the  relation  of  father  to 
offspring,  instead  of  being  based  on  an  innate  response 
which  is  closed  by  the  departure  of  the  mature  child, 
has  to  be  developed  into  a  sentiment.  The  foundations 
of  the  sentiment  lie  in  the  biologically  conditioned 
tenderness  of  paternal  responses,  but  upon  these  founda- 
tions a  relation  of  exacting,  stem,  coercive  repression 
has  to  be  built  up.  The  father  has  to  coerce,  he  has  to 
represent  the  source  of  repressive  forces,  he  becomes  the 
lawgiver  within  the  family  and  the  enforcing  agent  of 
the  tribal  rules.  Patria  potestas  converts  him  from  a 
tender  and  loving  guardian  of  infancy  into  a  powerful 
and  often  dreaded  autocrat.  The  constitution  of  the 
sentiment  into  which  such  contradictory  emotions 
enter  must  therefore  he  difficult.  And  yet  it  is  just 
this  contradictory  combination  of  elements  which  is 
indispensable  for  human  culture.  For  the  father  is  at 
the  earlier  stages  the  biologically  indispensable  member 
of  the  family,  his  function  is  to  protect  the  offspring. 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  261 

This  natural  endowment  of  tenderness  is  the  capital 
upon  which  the  family  can  draw  in  order  to  keep  him 
interested  and  attached  to  it.  But  here,  again,  culture 
has  to  make  use  of  this  emotional  attitude,  in  imposing 
functions  of  an  entirely  different  type  upon  him  as  the 
eldest  male  within  the  family.  For  as  the  children, 
especially  the  sons,  grow  up,  education,  cohesion 
within  the  family,  and  co-operation  demand  the 
existence  of  a  personal  authority  which  stands  for  the 
enforcement  of  order  within  the  family  and  for  the 
conformation  to  tribal  law  outside.  The  difficult 
position  of  the  father  is,  as  we  can  see,  not  the  result 
merely  of  male  jealousy,  of  the  ill-tempers  of  an  older 
man  and  of  his  sexual  envy,  as  seems  to  be  implied  in 
most  psycho-analytic  writings ;  it  is  a  deep  and 
essential  character  of  the  human  family  which  has  to 
undertake  two  tasks  :  it  has  to  carry  on  propagation 
of  the  species  and  it  has  to  insure  the  continuity  of 
culture.  The  paternal  sentiment  with  its  two  phases, 
the  first  protective,  the  other  coercive,  is  the  inevit- 
able correlate  of  the  dual  function  in  the  human 
family.  The  essential  attitudes  within  the  (Edipus 
complex,  the  ambivalent  tenderness  and  repulsion 
between  son  and  father,  are  directly  founded  in  the 
growth  of  the  family  from  nature  into  culture.  There 
is  no  need  for  an  ad  hoc  hypothesis  in  order  to  explain 
these  features.  We  can  see  them  emerging  from  the 
very  constitution  of  the  human  family. 


262  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

There  is  only  one  way  of  avoiding  the  dangers 
which  surround  the  paternal  relation  and  this  is  to 
associate  the  typical  elements  which  enter  into  the 
paternal  relation  with  two  different  people.  This  is  the 
configuration  which  we  find  under  mother-right. 


XI 

FATHER-RIGHT  AND   MOTHER-RIGHT 

TT  TE  are  now  in  a  position  to  approach  the  vexed 
problem  of  paternal  and  maternal  descent,  or,  as 
it  is  more  crisply  but  less  precisely  called,  father-right 
and  mother-right; 

Once  we  explicitly  state  that  the  expressions 
"  mother-right  "  and  "  father-right  "  do  not  imply  the 
existence  of  authority  or  power,  we  can  use  them 
without  danger  as  being  more  elegant  than  matriliny 
and  patrihny,  to  which  terms  they  are  equivalent 
The  questions  usually  asked  with  regard  to  these  two 
principles  are:  which  of  them  is  more  "primitive", 
what  are  the  "  origins  "  of  either,  were  there  definite 
"  stages  "  of  matriliny  and  patrihny  ? — and  so  on. 
Most  theories  of  matriliny  aimed  at  associating  this 
institution  with  the  early  existence  of  promiscuity, 
the  resulting  uncertainty  of  fatherhood  and  thus  with 
the  need  of  counting  kinship  through  females. ^  The 
variations  on  the  theme  pater  semper  incertus  fill 
many  volumes  on  primitive  morality,  kinship,  and 
mother-right. 

^  See  e.g.  E.  S.  Hartland,  Primitive  Society,  1921,  pp.  2,  32,  and 
passim. 

263 


264  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

As  often  happens,  the  criticism  which  has  to  be 
directed  against  most  theories  and  hypotheses  must 
start  with  a  definition  of  the  concept  and  the  formula- 
tion of  the  problem.  Most  theories  imply  that  father- 
right  and  mother-right  are  mutually  exclusive  alter- 
natives. Most  hypotheses  place  one  of  these  alternatives 
at  the  beginning,  the  other  at  a  later  stage  of  culture. 
Mr.  S.  Hartland,  for  instance,  one  of  the  greatest 
anthropological  authorities  on  primitive  sociology, 
speaks  of  "  the  mother  as  the  sole  foundation  of 
society "  {op.  cit.,  p.  2)  and  affirms  that  under 
mother-right  "  descent  and  therefore  kinship  are 
traced  exclusively  through  the  mother ".  This 
conception  runs  throughout  the  work  of  this 
eminent  anthropologist.  In  it  we  see  mother-right 
as  a  self-contained  social  system,  embracing  and 
controlling  all  aspects  of  organization.  The  task 
which  this  writer  has  put  before  himself  is  to  prove 
"  that  the  earliest  ascertainable  systematic  method  of 
deriving  human  kinship  is  through  the  woman  only, 
and  that  patrilineal  reckoning  is  a  subsequent  develop- 
ment "  (p.  10).  Remarkably  enough,  however,  right 
through  Mr.  Hartland's  work,  in  which  he  tries  to 
prove  the  priority  of  matrilineal  over  patrilineal  descent, 
we  encounter  invariably  one  statement  :  there  is 
always  a  mixture  of  mother-right  and  father-right.  In 
a  summarizing  statement  indeed,  Mr.  Hartland  says 
that : — "  Patriarchal  rule  and  patrilineal  kinship  have 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  265 

made  perpetual  inroads  upon  mother-right  all  over  the 
world  ;  consequently  matrilineal  institutions  are  found 
in  almost  all  stages  of  transition  to  a  state  of  society  in 
which  the  fMher  is  the  centre  of  kinship  and  govern- 
ment "  (p.  34).  As  a  matter  of  fact,  the  correct 
statement  would  be  that  in  all  parts  of  the  world  we 
find  maternal  kinship  side  by  side  with  institutions 
of  paternal  authority,  and  we  find  the  two  modes  of 
linking  descent  inextricably  mingled. 

The  question  arises  whether  it  is  at  aU  necessary 
to  invent  any  hypotheses  about  "  first  origins  "  and 
"  successive  stages  "  in  the  counting  of  descent  and 
then  to  have  to  maintain  that  from  the  lowest  to  the 
highest  types  of  society  humanity  lives  in  a  transitional 
state.  It  seems  that  the  empirical  conclusion  would 
rather  be  that  motherhood  and  fatherhood  are  never 
found  independent  of  each  other.  The  logical  line  of 
inquiry  indicated  by  the  facts  would  be  first  of  all  to 
ask  the  question  whether  there  is  such  a  thing  as 
matriliny  independent  of  paternal  reckoning  and 
whether  perhaps  the  two  types  of  counting  descent 
are  not  complementary  to  each  other  rather  than 
antithetic.  E.  B.  Tylor  and  W.  H.  R.  Rivers  had  already 
seen  this  line  of  approach  and  Rivers,  for  instance, 
splits  up  mother-right  and  father-right  into  three  in- 
dependent principles  of  counting  :  descent,  inheritance 
and  succession.  The  best  treatment  of  the  subject, 
however,  we  owe  to  Dr.  Lowie,  who  has  brought  order 


266  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

into  the  problem  and  has  also  introduced  the  very 
efficient  terminology  of  bilateral  and  unilateral  kinship. 
The  organization  of  the  family  is  placed  on  the  bilateral 
principle.  The  organization  of  a  clan  is  associated  with 
the  unilateral  kinship  reckoning.  Lowie  ^  very  clearly 
shows  that,  since  the  family  is  a  universal  unit  and  since 
genealogies  are  universally  counted  equally  far  on 
both  sides,  it  is  nothing  short  of  preposterous  to  speak 
about  the  purely  matrilineal  or  patrilineal  society. 
This  position  is  entirely  unassailable.  Equally  importan  t 
is  Lowie's  theory  of  the  clan.  He  has  shown  that  in  a 
society  where  in  certain  respects  the  one  side  of  kinship 
is  emphasized  there  will  arise  groups  of  extended  kindred 
corresponding  to  one  or  other  of  the  sib  or  clan  organiza- 
tions of  mankind. 

It  will  be  well  perhaps  to  supplement  Lowie's 
argument  and  to  explain  why  unilateral  emphasis 
has  to  be  placed  on  the  counting  of  certain  human 
relations,  in  what  respects  this  is  done,  and  what  are 
the  mechanisms  of  unilateral  kinship  reckoning. 

We  have  seen  that  in  all  the  matters  in  which  the 
father  and  the  mother  are  vitally  essential  to  the 
child,  kinship  has  to  be  counted  on  both  sides.  The 
very  institution  of  the  family,  involving  always 
both  parents,  binding  the  child  with  a  two-fold 
tie,    is     the     starting     point     of     bilateral     kinship 

^  R.  H.  Lowie,  Primitive  Society,  chapters  on  the  "  Family  ", 
"  Kinship  ",  and  the  "  Sib  ". 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  267 

reckoning.  If  we  distinguish  for  a  moment  between 
the  sociological  reality  of  native  life  and  the  doctrines 
of  kinship  reckoning  entered  into  by  the  natives,  we 
can  see  that  kinship  is  counted  on  both  sides  at  the 
earhest  stages  of  the  individual's  life.  Even  there, 
however,  though  both  parents  are  relevant,  their 
roles  are  neither  identical  nor  symmetrical.  As  life 
advances,  the  relation  between  the  child  and  his 
parents  changes  and  conditions  arise  which  make 
an  explicit  sociological  counting  of  kinship  im- 
perative— ^which,  in  other  words,  force  society  to 
frame  its  own  doctrine  of  kinship.  The  latter  stages 
of  education,  as  we  have  seen,  consist  in  the  handing 
over  of  material  possessions  and  of  the  tradition 
of  knowledge  and  art  associated  with  them.  They 
consist  also  in  the  teaching  of  social  attitudes,  obliga- 
tions and  prerogatives,  which  are  associated  with 
succession  to  dignity  and  rank.  The  transmission  of 
material  goods,  moral  values,  and  personal  prerogatives 
has  two  sides  ;  it  is  a  burden  on  the  parent  who 
always  has  to  teach,  to  exert  himself,  to  work  patiently 
upon  the  novice  ;  it  is  also  a  surrender  on  the  parents' 
side  of  valuables,  possessions  and  exclusive  rights. 
Thus,  for  both  reasons,  the  lineal  transmission  of 
culture  from  one  generation  to  another  has  to  be 
based  upon  a  strong  emotional  foundation.  It  must 
take  place  between  individuals  united  by  strong  senti- 
ments of  love  and  affection.    As  we  know,  society  can 


268  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

draw  upon  only  one  source  for  such  sentiments — the 
biological  endowment  of  parental  tendencies.  Hence, 
transmission  of  culture  in  all  these  aspects  is  invariably 
associated  with  the  biological  relation  of  parent  to 
child,  it  always  takes  place  within  the  family.  This  is 
not  enough,  however.  There  are  still  the  possibilities 
of  paternal  transmission,  maternal  transmission,  or 
else  transmission  in  both  lines.  This  latter  can  be  shown 
to  be  the  least  satisfactory  :  it  would  introduce  into 
a  process  which  in  itself  is  surrounded  with  perils, 
complications,  and  psychological  dangers,  an  element 
of  ambiguity  and  confusion.  The  individual  would 
always  have  the  choice  of  belonging  to  two  groups ;  he 
could  always  claim  possessions  from  two  sources ;  he 
would  always  have  two  alternatives  and  a  double  status. 
Reciprocally,  a  man  could  always  leave  his  position 
and  his  social  identity  to  one  of  two  claimants.  This 
type  of  society  would  introduce  a  perpetual  source  of 
strife,  of  difficulty,  of  conflict,  and  as  must  be  clear 
at  first  sight,  it  would  create  an  intolerable  situation. 
Indeed,  we  find  our  conclusion  fully  confirmed  that 
in  no  human  society  are  descent,  succession  and 
inheritance  left  undetermined.  Even  in  such  com- 
munities as  those  of  Polynesia,  where  an  individual 
can  follow  his  maternal  or  paternal  line  alternatively, 
he  must  make  his  choice  early  in  life.  Thus  unilateral 
kinship  is  not  an  accidental  principle.  It  cannot  be 
"  explained  "  as  due  to  ideas  of  paternity,  or  to  this 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  269 

or  that  feature  of  primitive  psychology  or  social 
organization.  It  is  the  onl}'^  possible  way  of  deahng 
with  the  problems  of  transmission  of  possessions, 
dignities,  and  social  privileges.  As  we  shall  see, 
however,  this  does  not  preclude  a  number  of  complica- 
tions, supplementary  phenomena  and  secondary 
reactions.  There  is  still  the  choice  between  mother- 
right  and  father-right. 

Let  us  have  a  closer  look  at  the  working  of  the 
principle  of  maternal  and  paternal  kinship.  As  we  know, 
the  organization  of  emotions  within  the  sentiment 
is  closely  correlated  with  the  organization  of  society. 
In  the  formation  of  the  maternal  sentiment,  as  we 
followed  it  in  detail  in  the  first  part  of  the  book  and 
as  we  summarized  it  in  one  of  the  last  chapters,  we  are 
not  able  to  see  any  deep  disturbance  by  the  change 
from  the  early  tenderness  to  the  exercise  of  authority. 
Under  mother-right  it  is  not  the  mother  who  wields 
coercive  powers  but  her  brother,  and  succession  does 
not  introduce  any  antagonisms  and  jealousies  between 
the  mother  and  her  son,  for  here  again  he  inherits 
only  from  her  brother.  At  the  same  time  the  bond  of 
personal  affection  and  tenderness  between  the  mother 
and  the  child  is,  in  spite  of  all  cultural  and  social 
influences  to  the  contrary,  stronger  than  between 
the  father  and  the  child.  Nor  is  there  any  reason  to 
deny  that  the  obvious  physical  nature  of  motherhood 
may  have  greatly  contributed  towards  the  emphasis 


270  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

of  the  bodily  identity  between  offspring  and  mother. 
Thus,  while  in  the  maternal  tie  the  ideas  about  pro- 
creation, the  tender  feelings  of  infancy,  the  stronger 
emotional  ties  between  mother  and  child  would  lead  to 
a  more  powerful  sentiment,  this  sentiment  is  in  no  way 
disturbed  by  the  burden  of  legal  and  economic  trans- 
mission which  it  entails.  In  other  words,  under  mother- 
right  the  social  decree  that  the  son  has  to  inherit  from 
the  mother's  brother  in  no  way  spoils  the  relation 
to  the  mother  and  on  the  whole  it  expresses  the  fact 
that  this  relation  is  empirically  more  obvious  and 
emotionally  stronger.  As  we  have  seen  in  the  detailed 
discussion  of  the  institutions  of  one  matrilineal  society, 
the  mother's  brother,  who  represents  stern  authority, 
social  ideals  and  ambitions,  is  very  suitably  kept  at 
a  distance  outside  the  family  circle. 

Father-right,  on  the  other  hand,  entails,  as  we  have 
seen  in  detail  in  the  last  chapter,  a  definite  break  within 
the  formation  of  the  sentiment.  In  the  patrilineal 
society  the  father  has  to  incorporate  in  himself  the  two 
aspects,  that  of  tender  friend  and  rigid  guardian  of  law 
This  creates  both  a  disharmony  within  the  sentiment, 
and  social  difficulties  within  the  family  by  disturbing 
co-operation  and  by  creating  jealousies  and  rivalries 
at  its  very  heart. 

One  more  point  may  be  mentioned.  Even  more  in 
primitive  communities  than  in  civilized  societies,  kin- 
ship  dominates   the   regulation   of   sexual   attitudes. 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  271 

The  extension  of  kinship  beyond  the  family  implies 
in  many  societies  the  formation  of  exogamy  side  by 
side  with  the  formation  of  clans.  Under  mother-right, 
the  prohibition  of  incest  within  the  family  is  in  a  simple 
manner  extended  into  the  prohibition  of  sexual  inter- 
course within  the  clan.  In  a  matrilineal  society, 
therefore,  the  building  up  of  the  general  sexual 
attitude  towards  all  women  of  the  community  is  a 
continuously  harmonious  and  simple  process.  In  a 
patriarchal  society,  on  the  other  hand,  the  rules  of 
incest  which  apply  to  the  members  of  the  family  are 
not  simply  extended  to  the  clan  but  a  new  scheme  of 
ideas  of  the  sexually  licit  and  illicit  has  to  be  built  up. 
Patrilineal  exogamj'^  does  not  include  the  one  person 
with  whom  incest  should  be  most  rigorously  avoided, 
that  is  the  mother.  In  all  this  we  see  a  series  of  reasons 
why  mother-right  might  be  considered  a  more  useful 
principle  of  social  organization  than  father-right. 
The  utility  is  obviously  associated  with  that  level  of 
human  organization  where  kinship  plays  a  paramount 
sociological  part  in  its  narrower  as  well  as  in  its 
classificatory  form. 

It  is  clearly  important  to  realize  that  father-right 
also  presents  considerable  advantages.  Under  mother- 
right  there  is  always  a  double  authority  over  the 
child  and  the  family  itself  is  cleft.  There  develops  that 
complex  cross-system  of  relationship  which  in  primitive 
societies  increases  the  strength  of  social  texture  but 


272  SEX    AND    REPRESSION 

which  in  higher  societies  would  introduce  innumerable 
complications.  As  culture  advances,  as  the  institutions 
of  clan  and  classificatory  kinship  disappear,  as  the 
organization  of  the  local  community  of  tribe,  city,  and 
state  has  to  become  simpler,  the  principle  of  father- 
right  naturally  becomes  dominant.  But  this  brings 
us  out  of  our  special  line  of  inquiry. 

To  sum  up,  we  have  seen  that  the  relative  advantages 
of  mother-right  and  father-right  are  well  balanced 
and  that  it  would  probably  be  impossible  to  assign 
to  either  of  them  a  general  priority  or  a  wider 
occurrence.  The  advantage  of  the  unilateral  as  against 
the  bilateral  principle  of  kinship  counting  in  legal, 
economic  and  social  matters,  however,  is  beyond  any 
doubt  and  cavil. 

The  most  important  point  is  to  realize  that  neither 
mother-right  nor  father-right  can  ever  be  an  exclusive 
rule  of  counting  kinship  or  descent.  It  is  only  in  the 
transmission  of  tangible  values  of  a  material,  moral  or 
social  nature  that  one  of  the  two  principles  becomes 
legally  emphasized.  As  I  have  tried  to  show  on  other 
occasions,^  such  a  legal  emphasis  brings  with  it  certain 
customary  traditional  reactions  which  tend  to  a  certain 
extent  to  obliterate  its  one-sided  working. 

Returning  once  more  to  our  starting-point,  that  of 
the  criticism  expressed  by  Dr.  Jones  on  the  conclusions 

^  Crime  and  Custom  in  Savage  Society,  1926  ;  Nature,  supplement 
of  6th  February,  1926  ;    and  article  of   15th  August.  1925. 


[NSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  273 

reached  in  the  previous  parts  of  the  book,  it  can  now 
be  seen  that  the  appearance  of  mother-right  is  not  a 
mysterious  phenomenon  brought  about  by  "  unknown 
social  and  economic  reasons  ".  Mother-right  is  one 
of  the  two  alternatives  of  counting  kinship,  both  of 
which  shows  certain  advantages.  Those  of  mother- 
right  are  perhaps  on  the  whole  greater  than  those  of 
father-right.  And  among  them  unquestionably  we 
have  to  mention  the  central  point  which  has  been 
brought  out  in  this  chapter  :  the  value  which  it  has 
in  eliminating  the  strong  repressions  in  the  paternal 
sentiment  and  in  placing  the  mother  in  a  more  con- 
sistent and  better  adapted  position  within  the  scheme 
of  sexual  prohibitions  in  the  community. 


XII 

CULTURE   AND   THE   "COMPLEX" 

T  T  7E  have  now  covered  the  field  of  our  subject :  the 
change  in  instinctive  endowment  correlated  with 
the  transition  from  nature  to  culture.  We  can  briefly 
indicate  the  course  of  our  argument  and  summarize 
our  results.  We  started  with  psycho-analytic  views  on 
the  origins  and  history  of  the  complex.  In  this  we 
came  upon  a  number  of  obscurities  and  inconsistencies. 
The  concept  of  the  repression  of  already  repressed 
elements  ;  the  theory  that  ignorance  and  matriliny  were 
devised  as  means  of  deflecting  hatred ;  the  idea  that 
father-right  is  a  happy  solution  of  most  difficulties  in 
the  family  ;  were  all  difficult  to  reconcile  with  the 
general  doctrine  of  psycho-analysis  as  well  as  with 
fundamental  anthropological  facts  and  principles.  It 
was  found  also  that  all  these  inconsistencies  result 
from  the  view  that  the  CEdipus  complex  is  the  primal 
cause  of  culture,  that  it  is  something  which  preceded 
and  produced  most  human  institutions,  ideas,  and 
beliefs.  In  attempting  to  find  in  what  concrete  form 
this  primordial  CEdipus  complex  has  originated  accord- 
ing to  psycho-analytic  theory,  we  came  upon  Freud's 
hypothesis  of  the  "  primeval  crime  ".    Freud  regards 

274 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  275 

culture  as  a  spontaneously  generated  reaction  to  the 
crime  and  he  assumes  that  the  memory  of  the  crime, 
the  repentance  and  the  ambivalent  attitude  have 
survived  in  a  '  Collective  Unconscious  '. 

Our  utter  incapacity  to  accept  this  hypothesis 
forced  us  to  examine  it  more  closely.  We  found  that 
the  totemic  crime  must  be  imagined  as  a  dividing 
event  between  nature  and  culture  ;  as  the  moment  of 
cultural  beginning.  Without  this  assumption  the 
hypothesis  has  no  meaning.  With  it  the  hypothesis 
falls  to  pieces  because  of  the  inconsistencies  involved. 
Having  found  that  in  Freud's  hypothesis  as  in  all 
other  speculations  on  the  early  form  of  the  family, 
the  capital  mistake  is  made  of  ignoring  the  difference 
between  instinct  and  habit,  between  the  biologically 
defined  reaction  and  the  cultural  adjustment,  it 
became  our  task  to  study  the  transformation  of  family 
ties  due  to  the  passage  from  nature  to  culture. 

We  attempted  to  ascertain  the  essential  modification 
in  innate  endowment  and  to  show  what  were  the 
consequences  of  it  to  human  mentality.  In  the  course 
of  this  we  naturally  came  upon  the  most  important 
psycho-analytic  problems,  and  we  were  able  to  offer  a 
theory  of  the  natural  formation  of  the  family  complex. 
We  found  the  complex  as  an  inevitable  by-product  of 
culture,  which  arises  as  the  family  develops  from  a 
group  bound  by  instincts  into  one  which  is  connected 
by  cultural  ties.    Psychologically  speaking,  this  change 


276  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

means  that  a  cohesion  by  a  chain  of  Unked  drives  is 
transformed  into  a  system  of  organized  sentiments. 
The  building  up  of  sentiments  obeys  a  number  of 
psychological  laws  which  guide  the  mental  ripening 
so  as  to  eliminate  a  number  of  attitudes,  adjustments, 
and  instincts  from  a  given  sentiment.  The  mechanism 
of  it  we  found  in  the  influence  of  the  social  environment, 
working  through  the  cultural  framework  and  through 
direct  personal  contacts. 

The  process  of  elimination  of  certain  attitudes 
and  impulses  from  the  relation  between  father  and 
child  and  mother  and  child  present  a  considerable 
range  of  possibilities.  The  systematic  organization  of 
impulses  and  emotions  may  be  carried  out  by  a  gradual 
drawing  off  and  waning  from  certain  attitudes,  by 
dramatic  shocks,  by  organized  ideals,  as  in  the  cere- 
monials, by  ridicule,  and  public  opinion.  By  such 
mechanisms  we  find,  for  instance,  that  sensuality  is 
gradually  eliminated  from  the  child's  relation  to  its 
mother,  while  often  tenderness  between  father  and 
child  is  replaced  by  a  stern  and  coercive  relation.  The 
way  in  which  these  mechanisms  operate  does  not 
lead  to  exactly  the  same  results.  And  many  maladjust- 
ments within  the  mind  and  in  society  can  be  traced 
back  to  the  faulty  cultural  mechanism  by  which 
sexuality  is  suppressed  and  regulated  or  by  which 
authority  is  imposed.  This  we  have  presented  with 
great  detail  in  a  small  number  of  concrete  cases  in 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  277 

the  first  two  parts  of  the  book.    This  again  has  been 
theoretically  justified  in  this  last  part. 

Thus  the  building  up  of  the  sentiments,  the  conflicts 
and  maladjustments  which  this  impHes,  depend  largely 
upon  the  sociological  mechanism  which  works  in  a  given 
society.  The  main  aspects  of  this  mechanism  are  the 
regulation  of  infantile  sexuality,  the  incest  taboos, 
exogamy,  the  apportionment  of  authority  and  the 
type  of  household  organization.  In  this  perhaps  lies 
the  main  contribution  of  the  present  memoir.  We  have 
been  able  to  indicate  the  relation  between  biological, 
psychological  and  sociological  factors.  We  have 
developed  a  theory  of  the  plasticity  of  instincts  under 
culture  and  of  the  transformation  of  instinctive 
response  into  cultural  adjustment.  On  its  psycho- 
logical side  our  theory  suggests  a  line  of  approach 
which,  while  giving  fuU  due  to  the  influence  of  social 
factors,  does  away  with  the  hypotheses  of  "group 
mind  ",  the  "  collective  unconscious  ",  "  gregarious 
instinct  ",  and  similar  metaphysical  conceptions. 

In  all  this  we  are  constantly  dealing  with  the  central 
problems  of  psj^cho-analysis,  the  problems  of  incest, 
of  paternal  authority,  of  the  sexual  taboo  and  of  the 
ripening  of  the  instinct.  In  fact  the  results  of  my 
argument  confirm  the  general  teachings  of  psycho- 
analysts on  several  points,  though  they  imply  the 
need  of  serious  revision  on  others.  Even  on  the  concrete 
question    of   the   influence    of   mother-right    and   its 


278  SEX    AND     REPRESSION 

function,  the  results  which  I  have  pubHshed  previously 
and  the  conclusions  of  this  book  are  not  entirely  sub- 
versive of  psycho-analytic  doctrine.  Mother-right,  as  has 
been  remarked,  possesses  an  additional  advantage  over 
father-right  in  that  it  "  splits  the  (Edipus  complex  ", 
dividing  the  authority  between  two  males,  while  on 
the  other  hand  it  introduces  a  consistent  scheme  of 
incest  prohibition  in  which  exogamy  follows  directly 
from  the  sexual  taboo  within  the  household.  We  had 
to  recognize,  however,  that  mother-right  is  not 
altogether  dependent  upon  the  complex,  that  it  is  a 
wider  phenomenon  determined  by  a  variety  of  causes. 
These  I  have  tried  to  state  concretely  in  order  to  meet 
Dr.  Jones's  objection  that  I  assume  this  appearance 
for  unknown  sociological  and  economic  reasons.  I  have 
tried  to  show  that  mother-right  can  be  made  intelligible 
as  the  more  useful  of  the  two  alternative  forms  of 
reckoning  kinship.  The  real  point,  as  we  saw,  is  that 
the  unilateral  mode  of  counting  relationship  is  adopted 
in  almost  all  cultures  but  that  among  peoples  of  low 
cultural  level  the  maternal  line  shows  distinct  advantage 
over  the  paternal  one.  Among  these  signal  characteristic 
advantages  of  mother-right  we  find  its  power  to  modify 
and  split  the  "  complex  ". 

I  should  add  that  from  the  point  of  view  of 
psycho-analytic  theory  it  is  difficult  to  explain  why 
the  complex  as  such  should  be  harmful.  After 
all,    to   a   psycho-analyst,    the    (Edipus    complex   is 


INSTINCT     AND     CULTURE  279 

the  fons  et  origo  of  culture,  the  beginning  of 
rehgion,  law,  and  morality.  Why  should  there  be 
any  need  to  remove  it  ?  Why  should  humanity 
or  the  "  collective  mind "  have  "  devised "  any 
means  to  break  it  up  ?  To  us,  however,  the  complex 
is  not  a  cause  but  a  by-product,  not  a  creative  principle 
but  a  maladjustment.  This  maladjustment  assumes 
a  less  harmful  form  under  mother-right  than  under 
father-right. 

These  conclusions  were  first  set  forth  in  two  articles 
which  appeared  separately  a  few  years  ago  and  are  now 
reprinted  as  Part  One  and  Two  of  this  volume.  Here 
again  in  dealing  with  the  general  problem,  we  have 
found  certain  confirmations  of  psycho-analytic  theory, 
if  this  be  taken  as  an  inspiration  and  a  working 
hypothesis  and  not  as  a  system  of  dogmatic  tenets. 

Scientific  research  consists  in  collaboration,  in  a 
give  and  take  between  various  specialists.  The 
anthropologist  has  received  some  help  from  the  psycho- 
analytic school  and  it  would  be  a  great  pity  if  the 
exponents  of  this  latter  refused  to  collaborate,  to 
accept  what  is  offered  in  good  faith  from  a  field  where, 
after  all,  they  cannot  be  at  home.  The  advancement  of 
science  is  never  a  matter  of  simple  progress  in  a  direct 
line.  In  the  conquest  of  a  new  domain,  claims  are  often 
pegged  out  on  which  the  barren  soil  will  never  yield  a 
return.  It  is  as  important  for  a  student  or  for  a 
school    to    be   able  to  withdraw  from  an   untenable 


28o  SEX     AND     REPRESSION 

position  as  to  pioneer  ahead  into  new  fields  of  discovery. 
And,  after  all,  it  should  ever  be  remembered  that  in 
scientific  prospecting  the  few  grains  of  golden  truth 
can  only  be  won  by  the  patient  washing  out  and 
rejection  of  a  mass  of  useless  pebbles  and  sand. 


INDEX 


Adolescence  :    17 

Adoption  :    rare  in  Trobriands, 

21 
Affection  :      maternal,     18,     26, 

207-8,   269  ;     paternal,   31-2, 

211-12,  214-16,  254-6 
Ambivalence  :   79,  80,  154,  261  ; 

of  savages,   138 
Amphlett   Islanders  :     neurotic, 

86-88  ;    perversions,  90 
Anal-eroticism  :  35  n.,  39,  51,  54 
Animal  life — v.  Family 
Atkinson,  J.  J.  :    149,  251 
Authority  :  in  family — v.  Father, 

Mother's  brother 

Babyhood  :    16.  18 

Birth:     18-19,    207,   209.  215; 

trauma  of.  22  ;   dream  of,  95 
Boas.  F.  :    157  n. 
Brother:      murder    of,     101-2; 

—in  myth,    114-15,    119-20; 

relations     between     brothers, 

120-1 
Buhler,  Charlotte  :   33  n. 
Bukumatula      (young     people's 

house)  :    67 
Butura  (fame)  :    45 

Cannibalism  :      mythical    origin 

in  Trobriands,  115 
Childhood  :    Pt.  i,  ch.  vi  and  vii  ; 

periods     of,      15-17 — v.     also 

Games,  Sexuality,  etc. 
Children's     communities  :       41, 

55-6 
Clan  :     45-8,   271,   212— v.   also 

Exogamy 
Co-habitation  —  v.     Sexual    re- 
lations 
Complex  :    —  of  family,  2,  183  ; 

—  and  myth,  5,  Pt.  ii.  ch.  i  ; 

matrilineal.  80-1,  83,  85,  120, 


123.  134  ;  —  and  social 
structure,  139,  143,  158; 
nature  of,  144,  279  ;  —  and 
sentiment,  173-8,  275-9— u. 
also  Nuclear  complex.  Qidipus 
complex.  Repression 
Co-operation:  219-20,237-8 
Courtship  :      in    animals,     193  ; 

in  man.  196-7,  225,  227 
Couvade :    215-16 
Crawley.  E.  :    157  n..  194 
Crime:    91.    100-2 
Cross-cousin  marriage:     114 
Culture  :     '  origin  '   of,    148-58  ; 
nature  of,  157-8,  165-7,236-9; 
behaviour  in,    180,   227-8 — v. 
also  Emotion,  Instinct,  Senti- 
ment, Family 

Darwin.  Charles  :    148-151,159. 

193  n, 
'  Decent  '  :       and      '  indecent  ', 

33-6,  38-9,  77,  235 
D'Entrecasteaux  Islanders  ;    87. 

90.  115 
Descent     —     v.      Father-right. 

Mother -right.  Family.  Kinship 
Dewey,  J.  :    157  n. 
Discipline  :      absence     in     Tro- 
briands, 27,  41 
Divorce  :    231 
Dokonikan — v.  Tudava 
Dream      fantasies  :        91  ;       at 

puberty,  63,  80 
Dreams  :      92-7,     144  ;      —    of 

death,    101  ;     —   and    magic, 

125 — V.  also  Kirisala 
Durkheim.  E.  :     157  n. 

Economics  of  marriage  :    238 
Education   in   family:     218-21, 

234-5.  256,  267-8 
Electra  complex  :    65.  252 


281 


282 


INDEX 


Ellis,  Havelock  :  33  n.,  193  n.. 
194,    196  n. 

Embarrassment  at  puberty  : 
60-1,  63 

Emotions  and  culture  :  236-7, 
276-7  ;  organization  in 
marriage,  230-3 — v.  also  Senti- 
ment 

Endopsychic  censor  :    242 

Excrement,  cursing  by  :    104 

Excretion,  interest  in  :  34,  38, 
51-2.  77 

Exogamy  :  79,  96,  195;  234, 
242,  271,  277-8;  breach  of, 
— V.  Suvasova 

Family  :  in  psycho-analysis,  2-7; 
comparison  of  savage  and 
civilized,  8-14,  19-32,  75-8. 
80  ;  —  complex,  2,  8,  15, 
74-82  ;  Cyclopean,  149,  158, 
160,  164  ;  among  anthropoids, 
150-1,  159-62,  163  ;  among 
man  as  compared  with 
animals,  summary,  225-8  ; 
fundamental  constitution  of, 
192  ;  importance  in  culture, 
184-5,  221-3,  239;  —  ties, 
218-24,  238-9—  t;.  also 
Emotions,  Fatherhood, 
Instinct,  Marriage,  Sentiment 

Father:  in  Trobriands,  9-11; 
in  Europe,  27-9  ;  compared, 
12-13, 23-4, 29-32, 42-4,  76-7; 
—  and  daughter,  12,  38,  43, 
65-6,  72-3,  76  ;  —  and  son, 
37-8,  43,  61.  68-9,  80,  253-62  ; 
gifts,  120-1  ;  authoritv,  42-4, 
183,  220,  224,  254,  257-62  ; 
absent  in  Trobriand  myth 
109-10— y.  also  Affection, 
Family 

Fatherhood  :  social  nature  of, 
23,  214-17  ;  ignorance  of 
physiological,  9,  109,  145, 
137-46,  171 

Father-right  and  mother-right  : 
262-73 

Fire,  myth  of  :    115 

Fliigel,  J.  C.  :    5  n.,  16  n. 

Folk-lore  and  psycho-analysis  : 
104— v.  also  Myth 


Frazer,  Sir  J.  G.  :  157  n.,  194 
Freud,  S.:  1,  6,  15  n.,  35,  157  n., 
172,  241-2  ;  modification  of 
his  theory  of  complex,  81-2  ; 
sex  latency  period,  49-51,  78  ; 
theory  of  neurosis,  86,  89-90  ; 
of  dreams,  92^,  124  ;  of 
folk-lore,  104  ;  Totem  and 
Taboo,  148,  168  ;  Cyclopean 
family,  149-152,  158-60,  164  ; 
totemism  and  beginnings  of 
culture,  149-59,  162,  167,  274  ; 
critique  of,  155-172  ;  on 
incest,  244-6,  249,  252 

Games,  sexual,  of  children  :    9, 

55-7 
Genital,     interest  :      35  n.,     39, 

55-6 
Ginsberg,  M.  :    157.n. 
Gregariousness — v.  Herd  Instinct 
Gwayluwa  (mania)  :    87 

Hartland,  E.  S.  :    263  n.,  264 
Herd  instinct,  disproved  :    185- 

92, 222 
Hobhouse,   L.   T.  :     157  n. 
Homosexuality — v.    Perversion 

Incest  :  father-daughter,  65-6, 
73,  100  ;  brother-sister,  84, 
96-9,  132  ;  mother-son,  245- 
52,  271,  277  ;  last  absent  in 
Trobriands,  100  ;  incestous 
dreams.  95-7  ;  incestous 
temptations,  80,  83,  139,  183, 
224,  Pt.  iv,  ch.  ix  ;  in  myth, 
126-9,  134  ;  biology  of 
incestous  unions,  243-4 

'  Indecent  '  :  33-6,  38-9,  51-5, 
71,  77  ;  category  created  by 
elders,  52 — v.  also  '  Decent  ' 

Infancy  :  period  of  development, 
16 

Infantile  sexuality — v.  Sexuality 
of  children 

Initiation  :  17,  257-8  ;  none 
in  Trobriands,  59-60 

Instinct  :  defined,  161,  186,  245  ; 
—  and  custom.  22  ;  —  modi- 
fied under  culture.  182,  184, 
192,    199-200,   203-6,   225-8; 


INDEX 


283 


strengthened  bv  culture,  210, 
212,  214-15,  216-17—1;.  also 
Herd  instinct,  Sentiment 

Jealousy :     uncle    and    nephew, 

79,  83,  103 
Jones,  Ernest  :    6,  136-47,    153, 

158,  162-3.  272-3,  278 

Kada — v.  Mother's  brother 
Kayro'iwo — v.  Magic  of  love 
Kinship:     47,    69  n.,    159;    bi- 
lateral and  unilateral,  266-9, 
272,     278— t;.     also     Father, 
Mother,  etc. 
Kinsmen:    47-8,  101 
Kirisala  :  magical  dream,  128 
Kroeber,  A.  L.  :    157  n.,  167,  172 
Kula  :     dreams,   93-4  ;     magic, 

130 
Kwoygapani  :    magic,  112 

Lang,  Andrew:     157  n.,  251 
Language :    180,  182,  189-90 
Legitimacy,  postulate  of :  212-14 
'  Libido  '  :    1,  33,  245 
Lowie,    R.    H.  :     157  n.,    184  n., 

243  n.,  265-6 
Lugiita  (sister)  :    108 

Magic:     93,    108,    117;     black, 

87-8,  101  ;  love,  84,  93,  123-9. 

130,     132-3  ;      suvasova,    99  ; 

shipwreck,  122  ;  —  and  myth, 

117-134;      magical    filiation, 

129-131 — V.  also  Kwoygapani, 

Waygxgi 
Mailu  :   neurasthenics  in,  88-9 
Malasi  :    clan,  and  incest,  97 
Marett,  R.  R.  :  157  n. 
Marriage  :    in  Trobriands,  9-12, 

45;       animal,     201-2.     204; 

human,  202-6,  225-8,  230 
'  Mass  psyclie  '  :    156-8 
Material  culture  :    180-2,  190-1 
Maternal  instinct  :     18,   20,   22, 

160,  207-8— y.  also  Affection 
Mating  :    197,  225,  228,  230 
Matrihny :      4,    9,     75-6,     103  ; 

—    and     myth,      108-17— w. 

also  Mother-right 
Matrimonial  response  :    202,  211 
McDougall,  W.  :    175 


Medium  (spiritualistic)  :    88,  98 

Miracle  :    131-2 

Missions  :  and  native  morality, 
90 

Mokadayu,  story  of  :   98 

Moll,  A.  :   33  n.,  49 

Morals  :    182,  256-7 

Morgan,  L.  H.  :  222 

Mother  :  and  son,  36,  38,  62, 
80,  220,  245-52,  269-70  [v. 
also  Incest)  ;  —  and  daughter, 
36,  65 

Motherhood  :  in  savage  and 
civilized  society  compared, 
19-23,  25-7 

Mother-right  :  102  ;  '  origin  ', 
137-140,  145-7.  171.  278; 
and  father-right,  Pt.  iv,  ch. 
xi — V.  also  Matriliny 

Mother's  brother  :  9-10,  13, 
44-7,  69,  79,  100,  113,  116, 
120-1,  258-9 — V.  also  Tudava 

Myth :  6,  108-34  ;  classifica- 
tion of,  108  ;  interpretation 
of,  116;  —  of  flying  canoe, 
118-22  ;  —  of  salvage  magic, 
122-3  ;  —  of  love  magic. 
126-9  ;  and  ritual,  133 — v. 
also  Fire,  Magic,  Tudava 

Nagowa  (mental  disorder)  :  87 

Nakedness :  no  taboo  in 
Melanesia,   55 

Neurosis :  among  Melanesians, 
85-90  ;   interpretation  of,  170 

'  Nuclear  complex  '  :  4.  75,  137, 
173-8  ;  varies  with  social 
strata,  14-15  ;  with  constitu- 
tion of  family,  81-2,  142  ; 
Jones's  view  of.  137 — v.  also 
Complex 

Nursing  of  child:  20-21.  23, 
208,  245-7 

Obscenity :     104-7 

CEdipus  complex  :  2,  5,  6,  65, 
78,  80,  83,  135,  182,  245,  252. 
261,  274,  278-9  ;  product  of  a 
patriarchal  society,  5,  75, 
167-70,  173  ;  assimilation 
of,  168-9  ;  assumed  univer- 
sality, 137-48,  158,  162-3,  171 


284 


INDEX 


Parental  love  :  among  animals, 
IW»,  207-8  ;    —  in  man,  208 

Parricide  :  102  ;  primeval,  152, 
Pt.  iii,  ch.  iv  and  v  ;  critique 
of.  172,  251,  274 

Paternity:  biological  foundation 
of,  207,  210-15;  cultural  rein- 
forcement of,  215-17 — V.  also 
F~atherhood 

Patria  postestas  — r.  Father, 
authority 

Patriarchy  :    168-70 

Peasant  family  :  14.  17,  29, 
34,;J7,  41,43,  51-4,  64 

Perversions  :  rare  in  Trobriands, 
57,  90 

Physiological  fatherhood  —  v. 
Fatherhood 

Pitt-Rivers,  G.  :  22  n.,  184  n., 
243  n. 

Plasticity  of  instincts  :  200,  206, 
216,  223,  236-7,  277,  Pt.  iv, 
ch.  vii — V.  also  Instinct 

Ploss-Renz  :    33  n. 

Pokala  (pavment)  :    120 

Pregnancy':  19-21,  204,  208-9, 
210-12,  214— j;.  also  Taboo 

Primal  horde — v.  Family,  Cyclo- 
pean 

Property  :  in  magic,  120-1,  125, 
128-9 

Psycho-analysis  :  relation  to 
biology  and  sociology,  1,  135  ; 
to  anthropology,  6-7,  116,  136, 
140-1,279-80;  —and  family, 
2,  75,  81  ;  —  and  myth,  134  ; 
— and  theory  of  A.  F.  Shand, 
241-2 

Puberty  :  59-73  ;  of  civilized 
boy,  60-4  ;  of  civilized  girl, 
64-6  ;   in  Trobriands,  66-73 

Rank,  Dr  O.  :    6,  22 

Repression  :  38-9,  71-2,  80-3, 
241-2,  273  ;  —  and  neurosis, 
89  ;  —  and  dreams,  91-3  ; 
—  and  abuse,  104-7  ;  —  and 
myth,  110  ;  —  of  knowledge 
of  paternity,  137-8,  144-7  ; 
-  and  the  complex,  143-6, 
171.   174-5 

Rivers,  W.  H.  R.  :    265 


Robertson  Smith,  \V.  :     148-9 
Rut  :    194   5.  197-8.  201 

Selective  mating — v.  Mating 
Sentiment  :     2,   75,    176-8,    191, 

205,    240-2,    248-50,    260-1, 

Pt.iv,  ch.viii — v.  also  Instinct, 

Complex 
Sex  confidences :    36  n. 
Sex  latency  period  :    49-55,  58, 

78 
Sexuality    of    children  :     9,    33, 

35,  49-50,  55-8,  77,  86,  277— 

V.  also  Games 
Sexual  desire  :    in  marriage,  233 
Sexual  dreams  :    95-7 
Sexual  impulse  :   193-8;  control 

of,    199-200 
Sexual    relations :      30,     195-6, 

200-6,    230-4  ;     and    mother, 

246-8 
Sexual  rivalry  :    36-7 
Shand,  A.  F.  :    2,  175-8,  240-2, 

247,  249,  259 
Sister— v.      Incest,      Obscenity, 

etc.  ;     substitute  for  mother, 

143 
Social  organization  :    221-3 — v. 

also  Family,  Clan 
Speech — v.   Language 
Stern,  W.  :    33  n. 
Stout,  G.  F.  :    175 
Succession  :   268-9 — v.  also  Kin- 
ship 
Suckling  :    245-7 
Sidumwoya  (love  magic)  :  125-8 
Suvasova  (breach  of  exogamy)  : 

73,  96,  99-100 

Taboo  :  79,  83,  128,  133,  2561; 
brother  and  sister,  12,  46, 
57_8,  70-2,  79  ;— of  birth,  19, 
22  ;  —  of  pregnancv,  21,  209, 
215,  254  ;  sex,  47^  77,  100, 
165,  195,  199,  200.  226  ; 
exogamv,  79  ;  incest,  79,  252. 
277  ;   origin  of,  148,  155 

Tomakava   (stranger)  :     47-8 

Totemism  :  148,  155.  162-3, 
Pt.  iii,  ch.  iii-iv  ;  totemic 
sacrament,  149,  152,  165 

Tradition  :    219,   227,  236 


INDEX 


285 


Tudava,   myth  of  :     111-14 
Tylor.  E.  li.  :    265 

Vlatile  (younp  man)  :    66 

Uncle  :     maternal — v.    Mother's 

brother;  substitute  for  father, 

143 
Unconscious  clement  in  complex 

174-5.   182 


Veyola-  ~v .    Kmsnirn 

Wayi^igi,     magic     of     rain     and 

sunshine  :     130,    133 
Weaning  :    23,  25-6 
Westerniarck,    E.  :     157  11.,    175. 

194,  196  n.,  212  n..  243  n  .244. 

252 
Witches,  flying  ;    122 


^K 


The 


International  Library 


OF 


PSYCHOLOGY,  PHILOSOPHY 
AND  SCIENTIFIC  METHOD 


¥ 


Edited  by 
C.  K.  OGDEN,  M.A. 

Magdalene  College,  Cambridge 


The  International  Library,  of  which  over  one  hundred  and  thirty 
volumes  have  now  been  published,  is  both  in  quality  and  quantity  a 
unique  achievement  in  this  department  of  publishing.  Its  purpose 
is  to  give  expression,  in  a  convenient  form  and  at  a  moderate  price, 
to  the  remarkable  developments  which  have  recently  occurred  in 
Psychology  and  its  allied  sciences.  The  older  philosophers  were 
preoccupied  by  metaphysical  interests  which  for  the  most  part  have 
ceased  to  attract  the  younger  investigators,  and  their  forbidding 
terminology  too  often  acted  as  a  deterrent  for  the  general  reader. 
The  attempt  to  deal  in  clear  language  with  current  tendencies 
whether  in  England  and  America  or  on  the  Continent  has  met  with 
a  very  encouraging  reception,  and  not  only  have  accepted  authorities 
been  invited  to  explain  the  newer  theories,  but  it  has  been  found 
possible  to  include  a  number  of  original  contributions  of  high  merit. 


^ 


^ 


Published  by 
KEG  AN  PAUL,  TRENCH,  TRUBNER  &  Co.,  Ltd. 

BROADWAY  HOUSE:    68-74  CARTER  LANE,  LONDON,  E.G. 

1944 


•®w^w^w^w^w^w^w^w^w^w^w^w^\ 


PHILOSOPHY  AND  PSYCHOLOGY 

INTERNATIONAL   LIBRARY   OF   PSYCHOLOGY, 
PHILOSOPHY   AND   SCIENTIFIC  METHOD 


A.     PSYCHOLOGY 

GENERAL  AND  DESCRIPTIVE 

The  Mind  and  its  Place  in  Nature.     By  C.  D.  Broad,  Litt.D.     20s. 

Thought  and  the  Brain.     By  Prof.  Henri  Pieron.    Translated  by  C.  K. 
Ogden,  M.A.     15s. 

Principles  of  Experimental  Psychology.     By  Prof.  H.  Pieron.     12s.  6d. 

The  Nature  of  Laughter.     By  J.  C.  Gregory.     12s.  6d. 

The  Psychology  of  Time.     By  Mary  Sturt,  M.A.     9s.  6d. 

Telepathy  and  Clairvoyance.     By  Rudolf  Tischner.    Introduction  by 
E.  J.  Dingwall.    With  nineteen  illustrations.    12s.  6d. 

The    Psychology    of   Philosophers.     By    Alexander    Herzberg,    Ph.D. 
12s.  6d. 

The  Mind  and  its  Body:   the  Foundations  of  Psychology.     By  Charles 
Fox.     12s.  6d. 

The  Gestalt  Theory   and  the  Problem  of  Configuration.     By  Bruno 

Petermann.    Illustrated.     17s.  6d. 

Invention  and  the  Unconscious.     By  J.  M.  Montmasson.     Preface  by 
Dr.  H.  Stafford  Hatfield.     17s.  6d. 

Neural  Basis  of  Thought.     By  G.  G.  Campion  and  Sir  G.  Elliot  Smith, 
F.R.S.     12s.  6d. 

EMOTION 

Integrative  Psychology:    a  Study  of  Unit  Response.      By  William  M. 
Marston,  C.  Daly  King,  and  E.  H.  Marston.     24s. 

Emotion  and  Insanity.     By  Dr.  S.  Thalbitzer.     Preface  by  Prof.  H. 
H5fifding.     9s.  6d. 


The  Measurement  of  Emotion.     By  W.  Whately  Smith,  M.A.     With 
Introduction  by  William  Brown,  M.D.,  D.Sc.     12s.  6d. 

The  Laws  of  Feelhig.     By  F.  Paulhan.     Translated  by  C.  K.  Ogden, 
M.A.     12s.  6d. 

The  Concentric  Method  in  the  Diagnosis  of  Psychoneurotics.     By  M. 

Laignel-Lavastine.     With  eight  illustrations.     12s.  6d. 

The  Psychology  of  Consciousness.     By  C.  Daly  King.     Introduction  by 
Prof.  W.  M.  Marston.     15s. 


PERSONALITY 

The  Neurotic  Personality.     By  R.  G.  Gordon,  M.D.,  D.Sc.     12s.  6d. 

Physique  and  Character  :  of  the  Nature  of  Constitution  and  the  Theory 
Temperament.  By  E.  Kretschmer.  Second  Edition  (revised). 
With  32  plates.     17s.  6d. 

The  Psychology  of  Men  of  Genius.  By  E.  Kretschmer.  With  80 
portraits.     17s.  6d. 

The  Psychology  of  Character.     By  Dr.  A.  A.  Roback.    24s. 

Problems  of  Personality  :  a  Volume  of  Essays  in  honour  of  Morton 
Prince.     Edited  by  Dr.  A.  A.  Roback.     21s. 

Constitution-Types  in  Delinquency  :  Practical  Applications  and  Bio- 
physiological  Foundations  of  Kretschmer's  Types.  By  W.  A. 
Willemse.     With  32  plates  and  19  diagrams.     17s.  6d. 

Conscious  Orientation.  Studies  of  Personality  Types  in  Relation  to 
Neurosis  and  Psychosis  by  Dr.  J.  H.  Van  der  Hoop.     17s.  6d. 


ANALYSIS 

The  Practice  and  Theory  of  Individual  Psychology.     By  Dr.  Alfred  Adler. 
(Vienna.)    21s. 

Psychological  Types.     By  C.  G.  Jung,  M.D.,  LL.D.    Translated  with  a 
Foreword  by  H.  Godwin  Baynes,  M.B.     Sixth  edition,  28s. 

Contributions  to  Analytical  Psychology.     By  C.  G.  Jung,  M.D.,  LL.D. 
Translated  by  H,  Godwin  Baynes,  M.B.     21s. 


Theoretical  Biology.     By  J.  von  Uexklill.    21s. 

Biological  Principles.     By  J.  H.  Woodger,  B.Sc,     24s. 

Biological  Memory.  By  Prof.  Eugenio  Rignano.  Translated,  with  an 
Introduction,  by  Prof.  E.  W.  MacBride,  F.R.S.     12s.  6d. 

ANTHROPOLOGY,  SOCIOLOGY,   RELIGION,   ETC. 

Psychology  and  Ethnology.  By  W.  H.  R.  Rivers,  M.D.,  F.R.S.  Preface 
by  Professor  G.  Elliot  Smith,  F.R.S.     17s.  6d. 

Medicine,  Magic  and  Religion.  By  W.  H.  R.  Rivers,  M.D.,  F.R.S. 
Preface  by  Professor  G.  ElUot  Smith,  F.R.S.  (Temporarily  out  of 
print.) 

Psychology  and  Politics,  and  Other  Essays.  By  W.  H.  R.  Rivers,  M.D., 
F.R.S.  Preface  by  Prof.  G.  Elliot  Smith.  Appreciation  of  Author 
by  C.  S.  Myers,  F.R.S.     15s. 

Political  Pluralism  :  A  Study  in  Modern  Political  Theory.  By  Kung 
Chuan  Hsiao.     12s.  6d. 

History  of  Chinese  Political  Thought,  during  the  Early  Tsin  Period. 
By  Liang  Chi-Chao.     With  two  portraits.     12s.  6d. 

The  Individual  and  the  Community  :  a  Historical  Analysis  of  the 
Motivating  Factors  of  Social  Conduct.  By  Wen  Kwei  Liao,  M.A., 
Ph.D.     17s.  6d. 

Crime  and  Custom  in  Savage  Society.  By  Professor  B.  Malinowski. 
8s.  6d. 

Sex  and  Repression  in  Savage  Society.  By  Prof.  B.  Mahnowski. 
12s.  6d. 

The  Primitive  Mind  and  Modern  Civilization.  By  Charles  Roberts 
Aldrich.  Introduction  by  B.  Malinowski.  Foreword  by  C.  G. 
Jung.     15s. 

Religious  Conversion.     By  Prof.  Sante  de  Sanctis.     15s. 

The  Theory  of  Legislation.  By  Jeremy  Bentham.  Edited,  with  an 
Introduction  and  Notes,  by  C.  K.  Ogden.  (Temporarily  out  of 
print.) 

Crime,  Law,  and  Social  Science.  Edited  by  J.  Michael  and  Mortimer  J. 
Adler.     17s.  6d. 

Law  and  the  Social  Sciences.     By  Huntingdon  Cairns.     15s. 

B.  PfflLOSOPHY 

The  Philosophy  of  *'  As  If  "  :  a  System  of  the  Theoretical,  Practical, 
and  Religious  Fictions  of  Mankind.  By  H.  Vaihinger.  Translated 
by  C.  K.  Ogden.    28s. 


The  Misuse  of  Mind  :  a  Study  of  Bergson's  Attack  on  Intellectualism. 
By  Karin  Stephen.     With  Preface  by  Henri  Bergson.     8s.  6d. 

Tractatus  Logico-Philosophicus.  By  L.  Wittgenstein.  German  text, 
with  an  English  Translation  en  regard,  and  an  Introduction  by 
Bertrand  Russell,  F.R.S.     12s.  6d. 

Five  Types  of  Ethical  Theory.     By  C.  D.  Broad,  Litt.D.     17s.  6d. 

Speculations  :  Essays  on  Humanism  and  the  Philosophy  of  Art.  By 
T.  E.  Hulme.  Edited  by  Herbert  Read.  With  a  frontispiece  and 
Foreword  by  Jacob  Epstein.     12s.  6d. 

The  Metaphysical  Foundations  of  Modern  Science,  with  special  reference 
to  Man's  Relation  to  Nature.     By  Edwin  A.  Burtt,  Ph.D.     17s.  6d. 

Possibility.     By  Scott  Buchanan.     12s.  6d. 

The  Nature  of  Life.     By  Prof.  R.  Rignano.     9s.  6d. 

The  Foundations  of  Mathematics,  and  other  Logical  Essays.  By  F.  P. 
Ramsey,  M.A.  Edited  by  R.  B.  Braithv/aite.  Preface  by  G.  E. 
Moore.     17s.  6d. 

The  Theory  of  Fictions.  By  Jeremy  Bentham.  Edited  with  an  Intro- 
duction and  Notes  by  C.  K.  Ogden.     With  three  plates.     15s. 

Ethical  Relativity.     By  Professor  E.  Westermarck.     15s. 

The  Nature  of  Mathematics  :  a  Critical  Survey.  By  Max  Black. 
12s.  6d. 

Ideology  and  Utopia  :  an  Introduction  to  the  Sociology  of  Knowledge. 
By  Karl  Mannheim.     17s.  6d. 

Logical  Syntax  of  Language.     By  Prof.  Rudolf  Carnap.    28s. 

An  Examination  of  Logical  Positivism.     By  Dr.  Julius  Weinberg.     15s. 

Charles  Peirce's  Empiricism.     By  Justus  Biichler,  Ph.D.     15s. 

The  Philosophy  of  Peirce.  Selected  Writings.  Edited  by  Justus 
Biichler.     17s.  6d. 


C.    SCIENTIFIC  METHOD 

METHODOLOGY 

Scientific  Thought  :  a  Philosophical  Analysis  of  some  of  its  Funda- 
mental Concepts  in  the  Ught  of  Recent  Physical  Developments. 
By  C.  D.  Broad,  Litt.D.     (Temporarily  out  of  print.) 

The  Statistical  Method  in  Economics  and  Political  Science.  By  Prof. 
P.  Sargant  Florence,  M.A.,  Ph.D.    28s. 

Dynamic  Social  Research.  By  John  T.  Hader  and  Eduard  C.  Lindeman. 
15s. 


The  Sciences  of  Man  in  the  Making  :  an  Orientation  Book.     By  E.  A. 

Kirkpatrick.     17s.  6d. 

The  Doctrine  of  Signatures.  A  Defence  of  Theory  in  Medicine.  By 
Scott  Buchanan.    9s.  6d. 

HISTORY,   ETC. 

A  Historical  Introduction  to  Modern  Psychology.  By  Gardner  Murphy, 
Ph.D.  With  a  Supplement  by  H.  Kluver,  Ph.D.  Fifth  edition, 
24s. 

Comparative  Philosophy.  By  Paul  Masson-Oursel.  Introduction  by 
F.  G.  Crookshank,  M.D.,  F.R.C.P.     12s.  6d. 

Philosophy  of  the  Unconscious.     By  E.  von  Hartmann.     17s.  6d. 

Psyche  :  the  Cult  of  Souls  and  the  Belief  in  Immortality  among  the 
Greeks.     By  Erwin  Rohde.     28s. 

Plato's  Theory  of  Ethics  :  The  Moral  Criterion  and  the  Highest  Good. 
By  R.  C.  Lodge.    24s. 

Outlines  of  the  History  of  Greek  Philosophy.  By  E.  Zeller.  New 
edition,  re-written  by  Dr.  Wilhelm  Nestle  and  translated  by  L.  R. 
Palmer.     17s.  6d. 

Plato's  Theory  of  Knowledge  :  The  Theaetetus  and  the  Sophist  of  Plato. 
Translated  with  a  Running  Commentary,  by  F.  M.  Cornford. 
17s.  6d. 

Plato's  Cosmology  :  The  Timaeus  of  Plato.  Translated  with  a  Running 
Commentary,  by  F.  M.  Cornford.     20s. 

Plato  and  Parmenides.  Parmenides'  "  Way  of  Truth  "  and  Plato's 
"  Parmenides  ".  Translated  with  an  Introduction  and  running 
commentary  by  Francis  M.  Cornford.     15s. 


BBADLEY    BROTHERS,    lOg    KIN08WAV,    LONDON,    W.C.3  :      AND    ASHFORD      KENT 


i'? 

■% 

5^ 

t-n 

% 

University  of  California  Library 
Los  Angeles 

This  book  is  DUE  on  the  last  date  stamped  below. 


'^'/jiijAiNr.-; 


\  i 


\0  % 


Of  C  0  7  im 


UCLA  COL  LIB  ,■■-,*. 


I    A    p  r  i I     III, 


^.        ^^OFCAIIFO 


^^ 

^*n' 

'4 

^•lOSANCflfjy. 

o  ,- 

rS 

v>:lOSMFlfj> 

^.OF-C 

> 

•<< 

W^ 


^4r 


f^ 


L  008  967  220  8 


■^., 


%